Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-22-1999 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY C ouncil meeting NOV 2 2 1999 NOVE^J^R22 1999, 7: VAY, oron6,^bQWesi 7:00 P.M. ESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA Approve/Amend APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Special Council Meeting of November 4,1999 * _ 3. Regular Council Meeting of November 8,1999 PARK COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEWS PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Irene Silber, Representative LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - Lili McMillan, Representative ^PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Bill Stoddard, Representative J»UBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 4. #2398 \Va> zata Country Club, 200 Wayzata Boulevard - Conditional Use Permit and Variance - Resolutions 5. ^ #2525 Larry Jacobson and Vickie O’Neill, 635 Ferndale Road North - Variance - Resolution #2530 William Wear, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard - Variance - Resolution 7. #2542 Bruce Hedblom and Carol Cline-Hedblom, 2601 Casco Point Road - Resolution 8. #2545 Lou and Marilyn Fegers, 3590 North Shore Drive - Variances - Resolution M #2546 Christine Wood, 4005 North Shore Drive - Variance Renewal - Resolution ^ "" Vi 5^/f . S If MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT . ENGINEER REPORT 10. Request for Sewer Connection - 800 Browm Road South 11. Pay Request ^^1 - Well #1 Maintenance Repairs 12. Request for Payment #3 - Orono Orchards Sanitary^ Sewer Project 13. Request for Payment #1 - Stubbs Bay Road Cul-dc-Sac Project 14. Approve Easement for Stubbs Bay Cul-de-Sac Project CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 15. 2000 Fee Schedule - Ordinance and Summary Ordinance for Publication 16. Prosecuting .Attorney Contract Renewal A AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 22,1999,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA Consolidation Study Grant Request - Resolution 0^. Park Commission Appointment Resignation of Full-Time Community Service Officer Robyn Hoechst Personnel Action - Kris Knollenberg, Police Records Clerk ^. 2000 Engineering Rates JXl- Certification of Delinquent Utilities and General Service Fees - Resolution 23. Renewal of Police Service Contracts Renewal of Animal Control Service Contracts for Year 2000 Funding of Parkland Acquisition _26. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Billing Regarding Woodhill Country' Club Litigation CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT • 27. LICENSES 2000 Liquor License Renewals Gambling Kennel * 28. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 1999 11/22 11/22 11/25 11/26 12/01 12/02 12/06 12/06 12/13 12/16 12/23 12/24 12/31 Council Work Session, 5:00 p.m. Council Meeting. 7:00 p.m HOLIDAY, THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY, THANKSGIVING Council Work Session, 5:00 p.m. Long Lake/Orono Consolidation Study Committee Meeting, 4:00 p.m. Truth in Taxation Hearing, 7:00 p.m. Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. Long Lake/Orono Consolidation Study Committee Meeting, 4:00 p.m. HOLIDAY, CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY, CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY, NEW YEAR’S Public A ttendance Meeting Date II- ,7,X V 7 0 C ouncil ^ Planning C ommission Park C ommission Other Please hll out the information REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER V:D - 2. U c) o ^ <-/ li 1 ^ u , ■ »Vi < W S\ h I," VSi-r-n tc L 7- ______Vy/"< h. i c>^ '^ j. / ri y;^c ^ *Z /wj/'i ^ t: ,>c- •< /ir c 3. U O -t/f'u‘ r'^ V' <-7^/./ ^ L ^.! \^ \ ^ V* S^ ^ ^ LX?!^ > r» 6.v5t7 ( ILA /^l UCfr C ^ /. . C i/' C' t ^ vj (j*- S . S kou 'a IU. 7. 8.. 9. 10.. 11. 12.. 13. 14. 15. x.^AmvwrwpiarwTDOcrroiiMs-TtBiic.ATT COUMCIL MEETING ORONO CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEET^Wfc ^ ^ 1999 MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 4,1999ci IY Ui- Ohono ROLL The Orono City Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Bob Sansevere, Barbara Peterson, and Richard Flint. Cruncil Member Charles Kelley was absent. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, Police Chief Gary Cheswick, and Recorder Lin Vee. James Anderst, the liquor license applicant, was also present. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:35 a.m. Mayor Jabbour stated the purpose of the special meeting was to continue the review of an application for transfer of a liquor license from the October 25 Council meeting, as the applicant has a time limit on w hich to act on the purchase of the business. Flint asked for comments from the Police Chief regarding his report. Chief Cheswick commented that there were 8 disturbances in Minnetonka Beach related to violations of a Minnetonka Beach ordinance that does not allow' construction on weekends. Flint asked if the complaints were all made by the same neighbor. Cheswick responded that some were and some were from the Minnetonka Beach City Offices. Flint did not feel the violations were a basis for denying the liquor license. Chief Cheswick felt the applicant should have addressed the complaints with the City Council. Anderst replied that the Minnetonka Beach Council had not been responsive to his concerns. He indicated that he had discussed the construction project with his neighbors, and they had no objections to him working on weekends. He stated that after he ran for City Council he began to have trouble with enforcement of the ordinance. Jabbour stated that he w'as asked to help with a weekend construction project in Minnetonka Beach, and was told it wouldn't be a problem. Sansevere asked if the Chief had concerns that the applicant may violate liquor laws in the future. Cheswick reiterated that the applicant should ha\e pursued the construction situation with the Minnetonka Beach Council, rather than continuing to violate the ordinance. Cheswick indicated he is concerned w ith an apparent pattern of ordinance violations. Flint stated that he had talked with Anderst’s attorney, Peter Jolmson. and confirmed that Anderst had waived the attomey/client privilege. Flint summarized his conversation with Mr. Johnson 1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 4,1999 stating that Anderst had visited his employee's home the morning of the event to give the employee directions for the day's work. The woman lived with the employee and said she was studying and needed a quiet place to study. Anderst said she could use his house. She arrived at his house about 4:30 p.m. dressed in a bikini. When Anderst arrived home, she was laundering his underwear. Cheswick confirmed that this information was basically what he had learned in his investigation. He stated that he was concerned over what happened in court. In the civil action, Anderst was told that if he plead guilty and signed a letter of apology, there would be no monetary compensation. He was also told that the case could go back to criminal court, which is what happened. By admitting that he lied, Anderst committed perjury and was found guilty of 5th degree criminal assault. Flint noted that when Anderst agreed to plead guilty, he agreed to cver>thing that was stated throughout two days of testimony, including some small details that may be questionable. .tabbour added that the Judge asked for a mis-trial, and the plaintiffs attorney suggested that if she got an apology, eveiylhing would stop. Cheswick stated that he based his report and recommendation on the criminal complaint and court reports. Anderst asked if the Council did not find it ironic that the case was thrown out twice in criminal court before going to civil court. Jabbour questioned why the references supplied by Anderst were not checked. Cheswick responded that the officers trained in background investigations do not typically check references because they are listed only to give positive recommendations for the applicant. Anderst had listed his accountant, attomev and friend. Jabbour stated that based on the civil settlement where there were no financial implications, it seems the applicant got trapped in the legal system. Anderst stated that he had called the Attorney General to discuss the Minnetonka Beach ordinance legarding construction on weekends and was told to contact a civil rights attorney. Sansevere asked the applicant why he agreed to plead guilty. Anderst replied that a legal, binding contract was on the table and he just wanted the case over. He had missed several days of work and money was becoming an issue. ORONO CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 4,1999 Sansevere indicated that Council had no information on the "other victims" noted in the court report. He e.xpressed his concern that there could be a pattern that involved vulnerable women. He asked Anderst if he had driven by the attorney's home to intimidate her. Anderst replied that he had not and did not know where the attorney lived. Anderst added that the attorney was aggressive and managed to have the story reported in the Star Tribune. Sansevere asked what recourse the City has if Anderst has any violations after being granted the liquor license. Chief Cheswick indicated that the violations would have to be liquor-related to have any bearing on license revocation. Peterson asked Anderst what type of establishment he was proposing. Anderst replied that he wanted to have more food, and planned to e,xpand the business to include the next 1,000 feet of the building. He stated that he had a 20-year lease on the building with an option to buy. The kitchen and dining area would be remodeled, and the bathrooms brought upstairs. He would then take over the additional space and put a bar in the center. He indicated that he would remain open for business throughout the remodeling project. Peterson asked about the capacity of the building. Anderst replied that 15 square feet is required per person. There would be a total of 3,000 square feet. Peterson expressed concern regarding parking. Anderst replied that there would be sufficient parking behind the building. Jabbour asked Anderst if he was aware of the building code requirements when upgrading a building, including handicap accessibility and sprinkler requirements. Anderst indicated he would follow-up with the requirements. Peterson asked if Anderst would be the owner and manager. Anderst confirmed that he planned to be the manager as well as owner. Sansevere asked if there would be a name change to the business. Anderst replied that he might change the name in the future, and may have a contest to select a new name. Flint questioned Anderst's comment that he would like a bar similar to Champ’s. Anderst replied that he was aware that he did not have sufficient room to have an operation like Champ's, but was referring to the food and atmosphere of a sports bar. Peterson moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the transfer of the On Sale Liquor License to James Duane .Anderst for the property located at 3380 Shoreline Drive (Jimmie's Lounge). Ayes 4, Nays 0. ORONO CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 4,1999 The meeting adjourned at 8:12 a.m. ATTEST: Linda S Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Cor jMciL MEETING NOV 2 2 1999 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETII^y MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 8,1 Wi ' OHOiVO ROLL The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Charles Kelley. Richard Flint, and Barbara Peterson. Council Member Bob Sansevere was absent. Representing staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse. City Attorney Tom Barrett. Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinbet^er. Assistant Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, City Engineer Tom Kellogg. Pubic Works Director Greg Gappa. and Recorder Jackie Young. Representing the Parks Commission was Chair Andrew McDermott. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve/Amend Items #4. 5.0.7.10.11.12.14.15. 16. 20.21. and 22 were added to the Consent Agenda Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *(#2) Regular Council Meeting of October 25,1999 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of October 25,1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS • Andrew McDermott, Representative McDermott stated that a list has been developed with the help of the Navarre residents of possible improvements they would like to see occur at this park, which has been given to the Public Works Director. McDermott thanked the City Council for acquiring the land in Navarre. Mayor Jabbour indicated that the City Council should take steps at its next meeting to appoint some new members to the Parks Commission to fill the present vacancies. Jabbour commented that Rick Meyers has been contacted about possibly assisting the City with the Dakota Rail to Trail project. Jabbour stated that he has spoken with some Individuals in Mound who have indicated a desire to see this project proceed forward. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Daniel Kluth, Representative Kluth indicated that the Planning Commission has had several lengthy discussions regarding the Page 1 li V'l ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 8,1999 (Planning Commission Comments, Continued) adult use ordinance, noting that he will be available to answer any questions that may arise during tonight's meeting. Kluth commented that the Planning Commission has also been working on Orono's Comprehensive Plan as well as uniform signage and lighting ordinances and a comprehensive look at the old Highway 12 corridor. PUBLIC COMMENTS None ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (#3) #2522 BANCOR GROUP. INC., COUNT< ROAD 6 AND WILLOW DRIVE NORTH - DENIAL OF REZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 4372 There were no representatives present from the Bancor Group at tonight's meeting. Weinberger stated that the Bancor Group has indicated that they will be submitting a new plan for this parcel of property to the Planning Commission for consideration at their next meeting requesting a subdivision, conditional use permit, and PRD for the property. Weinberger stated that before the City Council tonight is a resolution denying rezoning and the comprehensive plan amendment. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the neighbors will be notified of the upcoming meeting. Weinberger stated that the affected neighbors have been notified. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4372, a Resolution Denying Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Property Located at the Southwest Corner of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. Flint commented that Paragraph 6 should read Willow Drive North rather than Brown Road. Flint questioned whether Paragraph 8 and Paragraph D were reasons for denial and whether those paragraphs should be included in the resolution. Weinberger stated that those paragraphs were included In the resolution as findings of fact, but that the resolution may be amended if the Council so desired. Barrett stated that a brief review of the resolutions is conducted by himself, noting that he will conduct a more thorough review of a particular resolution if requested to do so by the Council. Barrett indicated that Paragraphs 5 and 7 contain a sufficient basis for denial of the request. Kelley stated that he would prefer Paragraph 8 be deleted since the City Council has not reached that decision, noting that the City Council has merely hinted that that might be appropriate. Mayor Jabbour commented that it was his understanding the City Council had reached a conclusion Page 2 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 8,1999 (#2522 Bancor Group, Continued) that a PRD would be an appropriate way to handle this property with a lower density due to the topography and soil conditions in the area. Kelley commented that he has not seen any topography maps for this area or soil reports and that th's paragraph may be premature. Kelley amended his motion, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4372, a Resolution Denying Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Property Located at the Southwest Corner of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North, with Paragraph 8 being deleted and Paragraph 6 being corrected to read Willow Drive North rather than Brown Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. •(#4) #2527 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT - PAINTER’S CREEK - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT • RESOLUTION NO. 4373 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4373, a Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to Allow Excavation, Dredging and Disposal of Materials, and Restoration of a 1,250 foot section of Painter’s Creek in Orono. VOTE: Ayes: 4, Nays 0. *(#5) #2528 DAVID AND PATRICIA YORKS, 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4374 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4374, a Resolution Granting Variance to Hardcover in the 75-250' Lakeshore Setback to permit Construction of Steps and a Covered Porch Entry to Replace Existing Steps at 2825 Casco Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#6) #2529 BRENT BENTROTT, 1453 PARK DRIVE - VARIANCE RENEWAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4375 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4375, a Rasolution Granting Renewal Variances per Resolution No. 4213 for the Property Located at 1453 Park Drive. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#7) #2532 HERMAN AND MARILYN CRAWFORD, 4745 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4376 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4376, a Resolution Granting Variances to Permit Construction of a Two-Stall Attached Garage for Property Located at 4745 North Shore Drive. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#8) #2535 RENDER DEVELOPMENT, INC., 1315,1335,1355 TONKAWA ROAD, 3430 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - CLASS III SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION NO. 4377 Due to the absence of the Applicant, this item was heard after Item 17. Page 3 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 8,1999 (#9) #2537 ADULT USE ORDINANCE - ORDINANCE NO. 192, 2ND SERIES Weinberger reviewed his November 4,1999 Planner's Report regarding the proposed adult use ordinance, noting that the City of Orono had adopted a moratorium on adult uses which is set to expire on November 12,1999. In order for the City to be prepared for any requests after the moratorium has expired, the City needs to have an adult use ordinance in place. Weinberger noted that the City Attorney has indicated that adult businesses are protected by the First Amendment as a freedom of expression. The ordinance will ensure that the City may regulate the adult oriented businesses. Weinberger stated that the first category is adult use - principal, which is a use where the sole or dominant activity involves the presentation, display, depiction, description, distribution, sale or rental of goods, services, entertainment or materials that constitute or contain an emphasis on adult uses. This type of activity would only be permitted within the industrial district. A distance of a minimum of 250 feet is required from the property line of a licensed day care center, public or private educational facility, public library, public park, on-sale liquor establishment, churches and church related facilities. A minimum of 1000 feet of separation is required between any other adult uses and any residential properties. In order for the property owner to be granted a conditional jse permit, the property must also comply with all current zoning, health and fire regulations. Weinberger stated the second category would be adult use - accessory. Accessory uses would be restricted to 10 percent of the floor area of a retail establishment and would consist mostly of the sale, or rental of goods, or materials that constitute or contain an emphasis on adult uses and would be allowed only within the Industrial District. B-1, B-3, B-4, B-5 and B-6 Business Districts where the primary use of the business is a permitted or conditional use. The same adult use - principal conditions would apply to accessory uses as well. Weinberger stated the third adult use category is defined as adult use exempt, which includes businesses that would exist as a retail business operation in any of the business districts where five square feet of their floor area, wall space, or shelf area is related to adult products. Advertising of these products would not be allowed and the product would need to be displayed in such a fashion that only the title of the product is visible. Weinberger reiterated that the adult use - principal businesses will only be allowed within the industrial district, with the industrial district comprising approximately 1.6 percent of the Orono community. The Planning Commission has reviewed the adult use ordinance, noting that they have attempted to limit the number of adult use businesses in the area Mayor Jabbour inquired what constitutes adult uses, particularly as it pertains to video rental businesses where X-rated movies are rented out. Tom Barrett. City Attorney, stated that adult uses are any sale, presentation, display or depiction involving what are called specified anatomical areas or specified sexual activities, which are further defined In Minnesota Statutes The concept of the ordinance is to restrict those entities where the dominant business is adult uses, noting that a movie rental place would probably not be classified as adult use - principal as long as it did not exceed ten percent of the total floor space or other regulations limiting the adult use Mayor Jabbour pointed out that a public hearing regarding this ordinance was held at the Planning Commission level, and inquired whether any member of the audience wished to speak to this item, Page 4 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 8.1999 (#2537 Adult Use Ordinance, Continued) There were no public comments regarding this proposed ordinance. Daniel Kluth, Planning Commission, commented that the Planning Commission has looked at other ordinances and cases involving adult uses in an effort to limit the skid-row or blight affect that these businesses can create. Kluth indicated that they have attempted to limit the concentration of these businesses to avoid the blight affect, which has been upheld by the Supreme Court. The Planning Commission has discussed this item with the City Attorney in an effort to limit the debilitating affect these businesses have on the general community. Barrett stated that the Cities are required to have some land available for these types of uses, and it would be preferable If these businesses could be located in the industrial district. Mayor Jabbour thanked the Planning Commission for their efforts regarding this ordinance, noting that this ordinance may be refined as needed. Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to approve and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 192, 2nd Series, an Ordinance of the City of Orono, Minnesota, Amending City Code Chapter 10, by Adding a New Section 62 Relating to Adult Uses. Flint commented that the members of the City Council are not enthusiastic about passing an ordinance of this type, but thanked the members of the Planning Commission for all their work regarding this ordinance. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT *(#10) PROCLAMATION OF HOUSING WEEK - RESOLUTION NO. 4378 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4378, a Resolution Proclaiming November 15-21,1999 to be Housing Week in the City of Orono. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. The Engineer Report, Items 11-16 Follows item 23. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (#17) ACCESS ALTERNATIVES FOR 4545 WAYZATA BOULEVARD Jane Slaughter, Applicant, and Bradley Beisel, Attomey-at-Law. were present. Moorse stated this item relates to the area between County Road 6 and Townline Ruad south of Highway 12 and concerns the establishment of a permanent legal access for property located at 4545 Wayzata Boulevard to a public roadway. Currently this property is accessed via a driveway that crosses a neighboring property and the Burlington Norlhem-Santa Fe Railroad tracks to get to Highway 12. At this time it is unclear as to whether this access is a permanent legal easement as it relates to the validity of a historical cartway easement. Page 5 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 8.1999 (#17, Access Alternatives for 4545 Wayzata Boulevard, Continued) Moorse stated at a previous meeting the City Council had requested the City Attorney review this matter. Moorse indicated that City Staff has been attempting to work with the property owner on this issue, but at this time the City Attorney does not have sufficient information to make a determination regarding the legal validity of the cartway easement. City Staff is recommending that access to Townline Road be obtained through two parcels located in Medina, which would eliminate an at*grade railroad crossing and a substandard access point to Highway 12. Jane Slaughter, 4545 Wayzata Boulevard, indicated that MN/Dot has offered some financial assistance for an access road. Mayor Jabbour stated it was his understanding MN/Dot would pave the road if a right-of-way is acquired Slaughter remarked that it was not her understanding that MN/Dot would pave the road but rather would help engineer and construct the road. Brad Beisel, Attorney-at-Law, stated he represents the Slaughter and Rudd families in this matter. Beisel noted that Townline Road is being permanently closed off at one end as part of the Improvements to Highway 12. As part of the proposed improvements to Highway 12, MN/Dot is considering construction of a frontage road to the south of the railroad right-of-way connecting Townline Road to the Rudd property, which would then be the new access road for the Rudds, Fraizers, Slaugfiters and Hickeys. Beisel indicated that this would be an acceptable solution to the access problem and is supported by 'tie Slaughters. Beisel stated that presently a lawsuit exists concerning another possible access route via property owned by Mr. and Mrs. Theis, with evidence having been found that the City of Orono created a public cartway in 1912 over this other access route. Beisel commented that the City of Orono may need to become involved in this litigation in order to determine whe .er there really is a public cartway over Orono property. Beisel indicated that this issue will become moot if access over the proposed new service road is established. Mayor Jabbour stated originally the City was requested to join the Slaughters in litigation to ensure that the cartway access is established, which is different from what is being requested tonight. Beisel stated that they are attempting to look at the other option available here. Mayor Jabbour commented that the Theis' have requested the City not take an adversaria) position in their lawsuit. Slaughter stated that they would like the cartway to be recognized by Orono. Kelley commented in his view the City should support the frontage road concept and that City Staff should proceed with discussions with the parties involved to try to resolve this issue. Mayor Jab>our inquired what exactly the City is prepared to do in this matter, noting that the costs incurred by the City would need to be assessed back to the property owners. Kelley stated that the neighbors will need to determine how the road will be extended, with the Page 6 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 8.1999 (#17, Access Alternatives for 4545 Wayzata Boulevard, Continued) road being built to City standards. Mayor Jabbour commented that the road would be a private road with the City having an easement over the road. Jabbour stated it was his understanding only three properties could access the road via a cul-de-sac. Gaffron stated that City Staff would be willing to work with the property owners to try to resolve this issue. Mayor Jabbour commented that this present City Council seems willing to pass a resolution in SLcport of what the Slaughters are proposing. Tom Barrett, City Attorney, stated that tonight's discussions are not binding on the City Council, noting that the Mayor has attempted to point out that there are regulations that need to be met, which is a planning process that needs to be followed through. Barrett stated that the decision regarding the final road will not be made tonight. Slaughter commented that their lease is up for renewal with the railroad and that they need to know whether the cartway is considered a public access. Barrett remarked he is unable at this time to make a determination whether the cartway is a legal access, which would be a costly process, and recommended pursuing the other option presented tonight rather than further pursuing the "cartway" option. Mayor Jabbour indicated that the City is willing to work with the parties to see if the frontage road could be constructed. Jabbour stated that the City is motivated in seeing that the three property owners obtain a safe access, with the City interested in working diligently with the parties involved to see that this option is accomplished. Jabbour noted that the costs associated with this process are normally assessed against the property owners. Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, approving endorsement by City Staff and City Council of the proposed frontage road/road to provide 4575,4555,4545, and 4300 Wayzata Boulevard with an access onto Townline Road, with the cooperation of Medina and the other parties involved, and subject to future review by the City Council, City Staff, and other appropriate agencies. Tom Barrett indicated that he was comfortable with the position of the City as stated in the motion. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#8) #2535 RENDER DEVELOPMENT, INC., 1315,1335,1355 TONKAWA ROAD. 3430 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - CLASS III SUBDIVISION • RESOLUTION NO. 4377 James Render. Applicant, was present Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing a three lot Class III subdivision - preliminary plat application. The subdivision involves four existing conforming lots being reduced to three lots. The City C ouncii had previously approved the Plat of Tonkawa Shores, which created three .5 acre parct j to be served by Outlet A. The Applicant currently owns Lots 1 .2. and 3 within the Plat of Tonkawa Shores. The proposed preliminary plat includes an existing lot located at Page 7 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 8.1999 (#2535 Render Development, Continued) 3430 North Shore Drive. The proposal would eliminate one lot and relocate the existing property lines to create larger parcels. Weinberger stated that each proposed lot meets the minimum requirements for new lots in the LR-1C zoning district. The City Council approved a variance for Outlot A permitting the road to only be platted with a 25 foot width. An eight food roadway easement is located south of the Outlot allowing a total of 33 feet dedicated for the private road. A second variance was approved for the private road allowing the road to be developed 16 feet in width where 24 feet would be required for a private road, with the property owners having the responsibility of maintaining the roadway. Weinberger stated that Outlot A originally was platted to end Five feet short of the west boundary of the property per Council's intent, such that it will be incumbent upon the City to deal with the owner of Lot 1 should the City ever wish to make the road connection to Birch Lane. The City Council at the time of the Tonkawa Shores subdivision determined that the road shall not extend to provide a future connection to Birch Lane. Weinberger stated all existing drainage and utility easements along the property lines shall be vacated, with new easements being dedicated ten feet along the exterior property lines and five feet along the interior property lines. No additional park dedication fees are required for this subdivision as they have already been paid as part of the original subdivision approval. The Planning Commission voted 6 to 1 recommending approvai of the subdivision subject to the following conditions; One, the City Engineer review and approves the drainage plan and stormwater treatment within the development; Two, Hennepin County approves the access to Tonkawa Road. Hennepin County has approved the existing lot arrangement and access for the underlying lots; Three, new drainage and utility easements are dedicated to the City of Orono; Four, underlying drainage and utility easements are vacated; and Five, final plat approval is subject to the MCWD approval of all grading and drainage improvements. Weinberger commented that this application is simply a replatting of four existing lots to create three new larger lots. City Staff is recommending approval of the application subject to the conditions outlined in the Planner's Report of November 2,1999. Render commented that Weinberger has explained the situation very well, noting that they are basically taking four lots and creating three new larger lots. Kelley stated that he would be in favor of continuing the road rather than stopping the road five feet short of the properly. Kelley moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4377, a Resolution Granting Preliminary Approval of a Class III Subdivision for Property Located at 1315,1335,1355 Tonkawa Road and 3430 North Shore Drive, with the added condition that the five feet be Included with the easements on Outlot A. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Mayor Jabbour commented that the Applicant is entitled to a partial refund on the park dedication fees already paid. Render indicated that he will not be asking for a refund on his park dedication fee. Page 8 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 8.1999 ‘(#23) CONVERSION OF DAKOTA RAIL TO RECREATIONAL TRAIL • RESOLUTION NO. 4384 Dean Patterson, Orono, commented he was unaware that this item had been approved on the Consent Agenda. Patterson stated that he was not aware of this project until recently, noting that he is opposed to the project. Mayor Jabbour stated that the City Council would be willing to listen to his comments. Jabbour commented that the City has been working on conversion of the Dakota Rail for the past year. It is the intent of the City Council tonight to pass a resolution in support of the conversion of the Dakota Rail Corridor to a regional recreational trail. Jabbour stated that the City of Orono has concerns regarding the large number of derailments that this railroad has experienced as well as the transporting of hazardous materials on this railroad line. The Dakota Railroad was requesting financial assistance as part of a project to upgrade the railroad to 50 mile an hour standards, which the City was opposed to. The City of Orono feels that it would be an asset to the community if this rai' oad line is converted to a recreational trail. Patterson commented that he became aware of this project approximately 12 hours ago, with a number of his neighbors expressing disapproval of the conversion to a recreational trail. Mayor Jabbour stated that the City has been discussing this project for the past two years, with a number of newspaper articles being published about the railroad and the possible conversion to a recreational trail. Patterson expressed a concern about people being in close proximity to his residence If the railroad track is converted to a trail. Ma.. or Jabbour indicated his willingness to meet with Mr. Patterson and his neighbors to discuss the Dakota Rail line and the trail. Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4384, a Resolution in Support of the Conversion of the Dakota Rail Roadroad Corridor to a Regional Recreational Trail. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ENGINEER REPORT *(#11) EXTENSION OF HENNEPIN COUNTY ELECTRONIC PROPERTY DATABASE AGREEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 4379 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4379, a Resolution Authorizing the City of Orono to Extend an Agreement for the Use of Hennepin County's Electronic Proprietary Data Base. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *'#12) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT - NORTH FERNDALE ROAD PROJECT Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Request for Payment, North Ferndale Road Project, to the City of Plymouth In the amount of $557,514.71. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Page 9 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 8,1999 (#13) AWARD CONTRACT FOR HEAD PROPERTY - SANITARY SEWER PROJECT - RESOLUTION NO. 4380 Tom Barrett, City Attorney, stated he would like to see the resolution be amended to be contingent upon the actual signing of the deed restrictions. Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4380, a Resolution Awarding the Contract for the Installation of Sanitary Sewer for 2090 Shoreline Drive (Head Property) to MinnCom, Nora, Minnesota, in the amount of $31,936.00, subject to the Public Works Director obtaining written documentation regarding the deed restrictions. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the "Sanitary Sewer Connection Letter of Agreement" with the City of Minnetonka Beach for sanitary sewer for the Head Property, 2090 Shoreline Drive. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#14) POLICY FOR SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve a deferred connection to sanitary sewer for 1235 Lyman Avenue as long as the existing septic system remains conforming to all requirements. Any situation that involves repairs, other than minor maintenance, or enlargement of the system, will require immediate connection to sanitary sewer. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. •(#15) ST. EDWARD’S CHURCH SANITARY SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION - RESOLUTION NO. 4381 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the "Agreement for Joint Usage of Sanitary Sewer and Water Facilities for the Cities of Orono and Plymouth". VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4381, a Resolution Adopting the St. Edward's Church Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Assessment Roil. VOTE; Ayes 4, Nays 0. •(#16) WEST FERNDALE AND HIGHWAY 12 LIFT STATIONS Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to authorize preparation of plans and specifications and advertisement for bids for the replacement and rehabilitation of the West Femdale Road sewer system lift stations and construction of the TH 12 bypass lift station. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#18) JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR WEST HENNEPIN RECYCLING COMMISSION - RESOLUTION NO. 4382 Moorse stated this item is a request for an extension of the joint powers agreement for coordinating recycling efforts. Page 10 1 a’* r *r* • ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 8.1999 (Joint Powers Agreement, Continued) Flint stated that he was not opposed to the agreement, but relayed some complaints he has received regarding a dissatisfaction with the work perfomned by the recycling company. Flint stated that this complaint has been raised with the owner of the company, but the problem still persists and that this complaint should be followed through. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4382, a Resolution Approving Extension of the Joint Powers Agreement of the West Hennepin Recycling Commission through December 31,2002. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Mayor Jabbour requested that the Public Works Director bring the complaint to the attention of the owner of the recycling company. Moorse stated that Amelia Kroeger. Recycling Coordinator, should also be informed about the complaint. (#19) COPS IN SCHOOLS GRANT Moorse stated that the City of Orono has been awarded a grant in the amount of $125,000.00 from the U.S. Department of Justice, which will provide funding for a police officer to work within the school district in order to increase the amount of time spent by the juvenile police officer in the school setting. Moorse stated the grant will enable the City to fund this police officer for the first three years, with the City needing to budget money for this purpose thereafter should they desire to continue with the program. Mayor Jabbour commented that it is difficult for the City Council to terminate a program such as this after it has been in effect for a number of years, noting that it is his personal opinion that the City does need additional police protection. Peterson stated that she Is in agreement that Orono does need more police protection. Gary Cheswick. Orono Police Chief, stated that the Juvenile Officers are generally rotated back to a patrol officer after three to five years to prevent possible burnout. Kelley commented that the hiring of an additional police officer will in all likelihood require the City to keep that officer once the grant is used up. Kelley inquired whether the escalation in wages are normal cost of living increases. Mayor Jabbour commented that he will be making his decision on whether to approve this request on the need that exists in the community for the additional police protection. Moorse indicated that the escalation in wages reflect movement through a series of pay steps. Cheswick indicated that the Scfuol District contributes $18,300 of the juvenile police officer's wages. Cheswick stated that due to the i^Lreased amount of illegal activities at the school, additional police supervision is needed. Page 11 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 8.1999 *(#20) RENEW PARTICIPATION IN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT • RESOLUTION NO. 4383 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4383, a Resolution Electing to Continue Participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program Under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#21) RECLASSIFICATION OF DEPUTY CLERK Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the reclassification of the Deputy City Clerk position from Level 4, Step 4, to Level 5, Step 4, in the City's pay schedule, and to increase the pay rate for Carole Haseman from $15.05 per hour to $16.06 per hour, effective November 1,1999. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#22) YEAR 2000 NON-UNION EMPLOYEE PAY ADJUSTMENTS AND INSURANCE CONTRIBUTIONS Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve increases to the City's non-union pay ranges of two percent, effective January 1, 2000, and one percent, effective July 1, 2000, and to approve an increase in the City's contribution to the cafeteria benefit plan of $25.00 per month to $370.00 per month for both non-union employees and the police officers. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Tom Barrett. City Attorney, had nothing to report, *(#24) LICENSES None *(#2S) BILLS Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 ADJOURNMENT Peterson moved, Jabbour seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 8:52 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST; Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 12 ‘^'^UNCIL MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ 2 I999 DATCti NovoDiiQi^^, 1999 ITEM NO; Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: ___________________________ Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Park Commission Inter\ lews There is currently one vacancy on the Park Commission. The term of the vacant position expires on December 31,2002. Two residents have indicated an interest in serving on the Park Commission. They are Theodore R. Edin and Rick Meyer. Copies of their applications are attached. The two are scheduled for interviews with the Council at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, November 22. APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION V’S' GlTYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Ka!!ey ParVway Orcno, MN 55336 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Commission Applying For: ^ Parks Commission □ Planning Commission D Community Task Force (Name)__________________________ Name "^keo <L^r C' » Address Post Office & Zip Code Z.ejTc> /Ji Telephone (H) _______ Resident of Orono______________years IW) Work Experience: ^ . Education: /rl «.■'aI <; ~C7-«^Tis A -• La 4 AB^ - JcU^o^T Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): ^ ^ ^ «-C« ^ i, \^r-C<i-i — \f i Age>iL ________________________________________ 5^f«,rc- , ^T'»AC<S4&e/'S - Telephone (612) 4iy72S7 • FAX 473-0510 Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. [Plesse be es specific as possibie. Use additional sheet if necessary.) K>o"r ^ tree Z. 6 e e <1 a I Lc/t 4* *- A^ i.fULt. Sve.'tiL.f e> ^ -'-or Boy .A r/vv.J^ 6>» Xf c«v^i ‘n r>x i e r-«c^*- •f u «-.-g>/Oe-«»v> ^S-yt ^ O^- A*.re ^ rro.K>fiL*±e^ />vJ6. t-r<;^s 4L «ra ry «- firg,a_, lUk.cir'e. X* /nc\»> /■««’* -1^ ^ ^Ca>^i^£— ^e.-A-r ro«^ o.«uy - orfUr}: h> . /tfcu>*3c What is your view of the role of the Commission?at IS your view or me roie ox xne ^/ummiaoiwn: S- /Qor Ce,.>^r,reiy u^r /H- 0* »x u#r[ (.*^ a.- -je-CiUfiT.j ^ ^ fe-i,k*W Other Comments: (f/se f/i/s space fo /nc/ur/e any /i/rf/ier information you wouid like the City Council to consider, or that you fee! is relevant to the appointment you are seeking. You may a/so attach other materials you would like the CouncU to consider.) X cc(k?«.vi g- gg(^- ^ruy^*r ^ u^,-K^r- ^r- AVeS-S «-7 \J * J..X—~ ft wcvi^ >✓>.■-v*—*• » — tifvy jg-t^ (?- /^*"j <r ^ V 60 (I I C>C“\ ^ ^ ^ I understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting 4. ^/b /? ? DateSignarjre **N0TE: Volunteer commission member's name, address and phone number will become public information. 040tS« 2 •• ^ fi CITY of OKON' iVSlVi^TK T- \v\ > ^ O// MunfcpaJ OS( . PcstO£ceBox6d Crvjul Bav, ^E-,ae50ta ££323-0066• •• TELEPE0NZ-473-ZJ57 • E4X-47MS10 ^ — APPLICATION FOP. CITIZEN ADVISOR! COMMISSIONS '^ '2' ,T I9se Coiroiission Applying For: X Parks Connission Planning Commission Community Task Force (Name) Name 'RICHARD P. MEYERS Address 2195 Bayview Place, Orono Post Office & Zip Code 55391-9546 Telephone (K)471-8288 (W)348-6589 Resident of Orono years Work Experience: Deputy Sherlff-Henneoin Countv Sheriff*s Departaent 18 years—past five years a Warrant Deputy responsible for the South & West Metro region; Previous five >ears assigned to the Water Patrol, lake Minnetonka Education • « n A. Urban Studies University of Minnesota 1976 • * M.A. Public Safety Curriculum and Instruction University of St-« Thomas 1^9— Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present) - rhaiT-man of tbp Titigens Advisorv Cons~.itte e for the Minnehaha State Pars • Project: Member of Che planning cocclctee for Cedar lake Park renovation.------ • ••• • • • nfcina to serve on this Coinmission ’please state your Ose additional sheet if please be as speci necessary.) • » lifelonz interest in conservation I_yant to he of service to my cocauni^-.- I have a xx-------s_-------^ —-- --- - - - -- «-«„«'<= mialitv of life. Par~k planning -—-— ““ ^ T want to help develop anis my avocation ana my legacy for f'"-nra aenarattons.- - - - --- -- , a • Other Comments:. Ii4° ‘"“tlno'' Son’^mly Sons°aer.) for only ^hQr;ug•n Vnovledge -------- _ • ftye years -------------------------------- ------e.-,1 -fQ^^aes. Pne ---------- ■ ■..■■■.^ '■•it*' '•hP LMCD on safety anj i, CKarlff's P'>'''‘rv rasoons ttfo f.-------^--- .i.iaS.hSSlUX'' Sharlff Deou —^ , ..............u.-fo-'n Coyncv. T a- also , T — .,, .ll n f, riatJli^-° . . ... Vnf ve ■■.nrad thftan 11 HTf I . T mc.vea <.„ca ana.■,/T-cc.,ia Hva 77 utilize your pares and . I understand this appointment may. meeting. ox g-ni ^ —= oate f- MPETINQ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION NOV 9 2 1999 DXW ■: HITEM NO, Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2398 Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata Boulevard Conditional Use Permit and Variances Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District Exhibits: A B C D Draft Resolution City Engineer Comments (November 11, 1999) Vertical Profiles Staff Report Application: The Wayzata Country Club had submitted an application to the City of Orono for reconstruction, relocation or addition of tees for each of holes #1-18. Reconstruction, relocation and or addition of bunkers along fairways and around most of the greens. The bunker reconstruction also involved installing drain tile outletting to existing ponds, and expansion of ponding areas on the property. The City approved a conditional use permit (Resolution #4146) to complete the work on the tee boxes and bunkers throughout the Country Club. However, the conditional use permit did not approve the plans for the ponds. The resolution states the applicant must return with detailed plans for pond construction. The Country' Club had intended to complete the pond alteration last winter, but due to the timing of the project the work was delayed until the winter of 1999/2000. The applicant has now received all permits from the MCWD for the pond alteration. This requires the following approvals: 1.Conditional Use Permit to permit land alteration to exceed 500 cubic yards per Municipal Code Sections 10.03, Subdivision 19-21. MPfETlNG REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION NOV P 9 1999 da ^^e/ NO.: ^ITEM NO. Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2398 Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata Boulevard Conditional Use Permit and Variances Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District Exhibits: A B C D Draft Resolution City Engineer Comments (November 11, 1999) Vertical Profiles Staff Report Application: Tlie Wayzata Country Club had submitted an application to the City of Orono for reconstruction, relocation or addition of tees for each of holes #1-18. Reconstruction, relocation and or addition of bunkers along fairways and around most of the greens. The bunker reconstruction also involved installing drain tile outletting to existing ponds, and expansion of ponding areas on the property. The City approved a conditional use permit (Resolution #4146) to complete the work on the tee boxes and bunkers throughout the Country Club. However, the conditional use permit did not approve the plans for the ponds. The resolution states the applicant must return with detailed plans for pond construction. The Country Club had intended to complete the pond alteration last winter, but due to the timing of the project the work was delayed until the winter of 1999/2000. The applicant has now received all permits from the MCWD for the pond alteration. This requires the following approvals: 1.Conditional Use Permit to permit land alteration to exceed 500 cubic yards per Municipal Code Sections 10.03, Subdivision 19-21. 2.A variance to permit alteration to the ponding area along hole #6 which is located in a City protected wetland. Hole #6 a. b. c. d. e. To expand the pond a total of 17,000 cubic yards of fill will be removed. The fill removed for the pond expansion for U6 will be placed between the fairways on holes #2 and #7. The fill will remain on the site. No fill w-ill be transported off the Wayzata Country Club property. Hole #6 is a City protected, NWl mapped pond that has been expanded once before by conditional use permit in the 1980s. The proposed plan shows it being significantly expanded, and should be a benefit to the City as it would enhance water quality as its volume would increase. The final grading plan shall show drain tile and piping as the water shall be treated on site. (Engineer Comments) Hole #12 b. c. d. e. To expand the pond a total of 5,500 cubic yards of fill will be removed. The fill removed for the pond expansion for #12 will be placed between holes #10 and #11. The fill will remain on the site. No fill will be transported off the Wayzata Country Club property. Reconstruction would expand the size of the pond. This pond is not within a City protected wetland. No variance is required. This expansion would require MCWD, DNR, and Corps of Engineer approval prior to the issuance of a land alteration permit. The final grading plan shall show drain tile and piping as the water shall be treated on site. (Engineer Comments) Cit)’ Engineer Comments Tom Kellogg, City Engineer, has reviewed the Vertical Profiles for the ponds and has indicated the plans do not show a 10:1 aquatic bench at the pond normal water level as recommended earlier. The purpose of the aquatic bench is to provide a margin of safety should any child enter into the pond. The City has permitted ponds without aquatic benches within the Spring Hill Golf Course. Mr. Kellogg has recommended approval given the pond is within a golf course and is located at 300 feet from any residential neighborhood. C & F Easement The applicant has submitted a Conservation and Flowage easement over the ponding and wetland area along hole #6 (City protected wetland). The easement will prohibit any vegetation removal outside of the normal maintenance of a golf course. Staff will not record the easement until such time the land alteration is complete to ensure a accurate legal description. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 4 to 0 vote to: Approve the Conditional Use Permits and Variance for land alteration within a City protected wetland. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the enclosed resolution A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (1) AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 19-21 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 9 FILE NO. 2389 WHEREAS, the Wayzata Country Club (hereinafter the "applicant") is owner of a property located at 200 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on February 16, 1999 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit land alteration within a City protected wetland for the expansion of a ponding area along hole #6; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for conditional use permits to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 9 to permit land alteration to permit the expansion of two ponding reas. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2389. 2. The City Council has previously approved a conditional use permit for the tee and bunker construction and reconstruction. The Master Plan included the expansion of two ponding areas. Page 1 of 5 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Council conceptually approved the expansion of the ponding areas in 1998, but required additional review and was not approved with the Master Plan for the Wayzata Country Club. The City has recommended a 10:1 aquatic bench for pond construction. Since the pond is within a golf course and not a residential neighborhood it is appropriate to approve the pond at the 3:1 bench. A 10:1 bench would encourage vegetative growth in the shallow areas of the pond which the Country Club has indicated is not appropriate for a golf course pond. The City Engineer has indicated any potential flooding would be confined to the Wayzata Country Club property. The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for land alteration will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit land alteration within a City protected wetland for the expansion of a ponding area along hole ^6; and for conditional use permits to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 9 to permit land alteration to permit the expansion of two ponding areas. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The land alteration is approved per the submitted plans, and subject to the issuance to a land alteration permit from the City of Orono. Any plan revisions would be subject to further review by the Planning Commission and City Council. Erosion control measures shall be in place prior to any land alteration activities, and shall not be removed until such time Staff authorizes removal. The fill removed from ponding areas shall be placed in the locations and to the grades as shown on the site plans on file with the City of Orono. Land Alteration Permits shall be issued annually for the remainder of the land alteration on the site as specified within Resolution No. 4146. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit and land alteration permit within one year of the date of Council’s approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (November 22, 2000). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of November, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owners STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of November, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects November 11, 1999 Mr. Paul Weinberger Zoning Administrator/Planner City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderlik €VJd AssociMes. Inc is An AthrmAUye Action '£qu€i! Opportu iity Employer Rrincip.iis Otto G Bonesfroo. PE • Joseph C Anderlik. PE • Marvin L Sorvaia. PE • Glenn R Cook. P£ • Roberj G Schunicht. PE • Jerry A Bourdon. PE • PoDcr! W Rosene. PE Ricn.ird £ furner PE and Susan VI EDcrim. C PA, Senior Consultants Associate Principals Howard A Sanford. PE • Keith A Gordon. PE • Robert R Pfefferle. PE • Richard W Foster. PE • David O Loskota, PE • Robert C Russek, Al A • Mark A Hanson. PE • Michael T Rautmann PE • Ted K F<eid PE • Kenneth P Andersen PE • Mark R Rolfs. PE • Sidney P Williamson. PE . L S • Robert F Kotsrnitn • Agnes M Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE Offices St Paul. Rochester. Willmar and St Cloud. .M.N • Milwaukee. Wl Website WWW bonestroo com Vi-' • I\\\yi v. 'i9 .0 Re: Wayzata Country Club Pond Expansion File* No. 139-2398 Dear Paul: We have reviewed the grading plan for the proposed expansion of two existing ponds on the Wayzata Country Club property. The site is located north of T.H. 12 and south of the Luce Line trail in the south half of Section 36. The ponds are located along the #6 and #12 fairways. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. • The plans do not show 10:1 aquatic bench at the pond normal water level as recommended in our 2/4/99 letter. The purpose of the aquatic bench is to provide a margin of safety should a child wander into the pond. The City has permitted the constmetion of ponds without the aquatic bench on other golf courses in the City (Spring Hill). It appears that the proposed design is acceptable given it is a private course and the ponds are at least 300-feet from any residential neighborhood. • We question whether the 4-inch outlet pipes shown for both ponds are adequate for a 50 or 100- year storm event. We cannot verify the correct outlet pipe size without drainage and ponding calculations. This may not be an issue as any flooding of the ponds and corresponding damage will be confined to the Country Club property. • The plans show a balance of cut and fill on site, we would expect that no excess material be hauled off site. • All temporary erosion control must be in place prior to the rt of construction. Please contact me at (651) 604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gappa. City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 • • • • •• • . * . *•• *•**••• •••*•#•*«#*• • «•*«*••♦* 14, t5vv«d.s %% i, r/\o'^ci- ^<su^ ^<^U <^U . /^OU)C<L A/ 5^*Vr> /o' dcc^ffcuf cc^Ut. /flESt: un^ i/JiTW-Jo //j^ tAjl^xli ^ ') PoO^^ X. <y*^SL 0^^ ^• CU'C-'-iub • cOxcn CC ;^'i. ^rrr >»' 3 TO Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM; Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:February 9,1999 SUBJECT: #2398 Wayzata Country Club Conditional Use Permit and Variance- Public Hearing Zoning Dbtrict: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre) Summary of Request: Last year the Wayzata Country applied to the City for a Conditional Use Perinii for upgrading the course to include: 1. Reconstruction, relocation or addition of tees for each of holes #1-18. 2. Reconstruction, relocation and or addition of bunkers along fairways and around most of the greens. The bunker reconstruction also involved installing drain tile outletting to existing ponds. 3. Expansion of 3 pond areas on the property. The City approved a conditional use permit (Resolution #4146) to complete the work on the tee boxes and bunkers throughout the Country Club. However, the conditional use permit did not approve the plans for the ponds. The resolution states the applicant must return with detailed plans for pond construction. Prior to issuing the land alteration permit staff is requesting the following to be filed with the City of Orono: 1. 2. 3. 4. Grading Plan showing a 10:1 aquatic bench at the normal water level. (Engineer Comments) MCWD Approval DNR Approval Corps of Engineers permit The applicant has stated he has received approval from the appropriate agencies. A copy of the permits shall be provided to the City prior to a land alteration permit being issued. §2398 Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata BM ConJiiional Uu Pirmit and Vanance 2/16.99 Fagtl The ponding area on hole #6 is in a City protected wetland and must have a variance approved to allow grading. Review of Proposed Land Alteration Hole #6 a. b. c. d. e. To expand the pond a total of 17,000 cubic yards of fill will be removed. The fill removed for the pond expansion for #6 will be placed between the fairways on holes #2 and #7. The fill will remain on the site. No fill will be transported off the Wayzata Country Club property. Hole #6 is a City protected, NWI mapped pond that has been expanded once before by conditional use permit in the 1980s. The proposed plan shows it being significantly expanded, and should be a benefit to the City as it would enhance water quality as its volume would increase. The final grading plan shall show drain tile and piping as the water shall be treated on site. (Engineer Comments) Hole #12 a b. c. d. e. To expand the pond a total of 5,500 cubic yards of fill will be removed. The fill removed for the pond expansion for #12 will be placed between holes #10 and #11. The fill will remain on the site. No fill will be transported off the Wayzata Country Club property. Reconstruction would expand the size of the pend. This pond is not within a City protected wetland. No variance is required. exj'cnsion would require MCWD, DNR, and Corps of Engineer approval prior to the issuance of a land alteration permit. The final grading plan shall show drain tile and piping as the water shall be treated on site. (Engineer Comments) DNR Comments The DNR has stated they do not have any opposition to the proposed project, but have requested any additional drainage be diverted away from the Luce Line Trail that dissects the Country Club. It is clear from the plans the total volume of the ponds will increase and drainage will not be impacted. Staff Recommendation Staff did recommend conceptual approval to the pond expansions last year. The approvals are B2393 Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata Bhd. Conditional Use Permit and Variance 2/16/99 Page! uassaou^ • » subject to the following conditions: Prior to issuing the land alteration permit staff is requesting the following to be filed with the City of Orono: 1. 2. 3. 4. Grading Plan showing a 10:1 aquatic bench at the normal water level. (Engineer Comments) MCWD Approval DNR Approval Corps of Engineers permit Staff is also recommending approval to permit a variance for grading within a City protected wetland on hole #6. Attachments A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Application Plat Map Engineer Comments - Tom Kellogg DNR Conunents ~ Suzann Willhite Drainage Plan Hole #6 Stockpile Plan Hole #6 Proposed Plan Drainage Plan Hole #12 Stockpile Plan Hole #12 Proposed Plan Survey Resolution #4146 Resolution #2592 Resolution #2118 Resolution #1977 WJ95 Country Club 200 n-ayzata Blvd Conditional Use Permit and Variance 2/16/99 Pagel sJ . CITY.OF ORONO CITY OF ORONC ^ 612A730510 07/09/98 10:58 0:06/13 NO:795 Application #______ Date Received Amount Paid 2 ^ - GENERAL LAND DSE APPLICATION PROPERTY LpC ITION Site Address _ Type of Applies ion to be Filed Property Identifi applicant TMattie Wayzat^ Country Club »Uon Number (PJD.) See attached Address 200 W OWT^XR (if different than applicant) Name______ Address 200 West Wayzata Blvd. /Vfayzata, MN Phone fhomel 473-8846 Phone (work)________ »st Wayzata Blvd. CiQf Wayzata Zip 55391 Phone (home). Phone (work). City Zip. Date Property Acquired 1956 Approximately^ I (do) (do not) ilso own the adjacent parcels of land. ‘ (month/year) FEES - CONDmpNAL USE PERMITS - ^ $ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____$175.0( Residential Accessory Use _____$250.0( Institutional (church, school, etc.) $225.0(' Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.oJ Duplex Crcdit/Bldg _____$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $2SO.o6 Land Alteration trading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain prading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more and digging ponds Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.0<) Renewal Fee (no change from original application) Afler-t le-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLIC____ATIONS $250.0) Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $300.0) Vacation $200.0p Easement Vacation SlOO.ob Easement Vacation With Subdivision $350.00 Rezonmg (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $350.o|d Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other see Fee Schedule I'ffe CITY OF ORONO © 6124730510 07/09/98 10:58 0 :07/13 WO:795 • REQUIRED SUBmiTALS 1. X Comple ed Application Form. 2. X Dcscribi request in detail. 3. X _ Certifie< Property Owners List of owners within 350 ’, labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Finance Certific^e of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey informa ___Attach X__Topogr changes X List of ion. egal description to application if not included on required survey, phic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve in elevation (grades). be legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the prop erty. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Constru :tion plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUtmON (11” X 17” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (S taff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and application is not Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your cbmplete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical S aff:Date APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant here and/or unusual e; }y agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) enses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the knowledge. Wayzata^XllbuntPs^^^ By; ----Date 7/20/98 5)(pem information suppliejd is true and correct to the best of hi Applicant’s signatur OWNER’S SIGN/.TURE The owner hercbj reasonable entry c and Council memb • Owner’s signature ^^pir^^^^’o^rhauser. Secretary acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized nto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, :rs for purposes of investigafiqp^^nd verification of this request. Wayzata^^Cm^^S^ By: ______Date 7/?n/Qfl ! Secretary Applicant must have ill subminals into jKe City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at eetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant b unable to attend a e make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Planning Commission all scheduled review rr scheduled meeting, pierBuilding tc Zoning Omce of thb change prior to the meeting. TS* . ; m \ \ ■;:-:<%-«-.5^:-x->,v::X':':<vv<Xvs-M£•:•;^••;^<<•;■^x<•^xc■x<<^v^•X'>:^^ ‘VVy-••• j _ I I riv.‘.N‘!‘!'j'.v*.s*I ‘XC^*^'€V.*.sj ‘X;.' •:W;::i:i:::;:x:l::$:>X^^ ----., -i "^TT3'^ 5' a] f':^=r-iM.LrL .L^t- I in i^rrrjy •ii - V'c> V I .1 U-' i »13 t;;U : i »?>^* ‘ 23k \ ^ \*4e 1 -Jii ^ I Bonestroo ^=jg Rosene Anderlik& f\j| Associates Engineers & Architects Bostne, AndtrUU snd Asso^istes. me. is sn Affirmsttve Aetton/tquH Oppatimity imptoyef Pr rcpsis: Octo C. lontfcroo. ^C. • JotcpH C Antfcriik. Pt. • Mjrvin L Sofvjia. PJL • tichjfd £. lUrntr. Pi. • CIcnn ff. CooH. PL • toOerc G. Scminichc. KC. • Jerry A. Bourdon, P.L • ffoccr: W. Iloscnt. ^.C. md Suun M. Cherfm. CAA^ Senior Consuicencs Aiiocfjr# Pnnctpsis: Howard A. Sanford. • Keiin A. Gordon. F.£. • ffobert E Pfefftrfe. Pi • » C^ard w foster. PE • David O Lotkota. PE • Robert C Puisek. A.i.A. • Mark A, Hanson. Pi • v.cnaei T. Raotinann. PE. • Tea K fieid. PE • kennetfi P Anderson. Pi • Mark E Rolfi. PE. • S'Crey P Wiiiiarmon. PE« LI • Robert f. Xotsmtn • Agnes M. Ring • .Micnaei P. Rau. PX • A.ian Rick Scnmidt. PE Cfftcer St Paul. Rochester, wiiimar and St Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wi *4 ’tsxife WWW bonestroo com c February 4, 1999 Mr. Paul Weinberger Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re: Wayzata Country Club Pond Expansion File No. 139-2398 Dear Paul: We have reviewed the grading plan for the proposed expansion of two existing ponds on the Wayzata Country Club property. The site is located north of T.H. 12 and south of the Luce Une trail in the south half of Section 36. The ponds are located along the #6 and #12 fairways. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. We recommend that the ponds be graded to include a 10:1 aquatic bench at the normal water level. The bench should be at least 10 feet in width to provide a vegetated safety buffer. Does either pond have an outlet? Outlet pipes pr draintile should be shown on the plans. It appears that any flooding of the ponds will be confined to the Country Club property. • The plans show a balance of cut and fill on site, we would expect that no excess material be hauled off site. • All temporary erosion control must be in place prior to the start of construction. Please contact me at 651-604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLDC & ASSOCIATES. INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gappa. City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651*636*4600 • Fax: 651*636*1311 2-11-1999 2:Q7PM FROll DNR SW AREA CFFICE 612 832 6178 P. 1 0 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Region 6A Trails & Wateru'ays, 9925 Valley View Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344. Office (612) 826-6764; (Fax) S26-6767. February 11,1999 City of Orono Paul Weinberger 2750 Kelley Parki^'ay PO Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 Dear Mr. WeinberRer, This letter addresses concerns regarding Conditional Use Permit #2398 submitted by Wayzata Country Club to the City of Orono Planning Commission. The pennit is for pond and water drainage alterations on holes number 6 and 12 of the golf course. The Stale of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources, Trails & Waterways Unit manages the Luce Line State Trail which runs through the Wayzata Country Club. Hole number 6 is adjacent to the trail to tlie north. There are ^vo major concerns rcgaiding this permit. One, that construction and future maintenance of the golf course not trespass onto the trail lighl-of-way. And two, that water drainage not be altered in any way that may adversely affect vhe trail. Please include these concem.s in the permit file for consideration. Thank you, Suzann Willhite Metro Trails & Waterways Specialist cc: Manha Reger DNR Inriirmation. <>I2-29C-0I^7. 1 •KH»-766 ftO(x> • f H; f*l2.:96o4.Sl. I Ki,n>-657..1'>> An C-unI t*np?vv.*f Whu \aluc^ Or •ii>'»! lO*. P*#sl*C(4i«uirt4*r 1 IPFF \ % Vj. i 'r L 'm'L V/. r i': ' »■li« m /• V .Mf . .1 <r • J:X‘ V/' » » »• 'aa wmmw^m.B L.’ti.’j i»liM mBm m m m PipPiilP* Ml iiw m Si‘0^ X*.‘' I *wmIP FEATUKK I I.KAK'INi* Tin Iv'riiimsil Ti;inspliiiilnl In •> C iInK l .H. I . i Ul I*. iiiilnl I'ntiiialril ». • ti\ I I'/\ 111. KViiiiiviil Nrw AliUTMKNT WAl.l l\*iu k (.kASSiNt;: lUnliyass Sod MISC.: • • ..----------- -■• “ y “:-™:'~\:':r^< * I ,.•--------------------------...-• ^------- --------------------------r"——- # • • • EATUKI U-1N*. it*f K'rtttm:il i;iii.s|il«ililril IM l> 'I »KI% l X I .iin 1‘. HiiU’il |•C•|I^MiUl•ll >%i rnitl. Vmiivnl liA% LH MKNT WAU V*4H k ASSINtV: irnl|;iiisN Siill SC.: ?ii!=fc ^4.. X 4#«4 % •/''•I il'>^ -•• ■/■ . •• • • • • ^. •-. V y:x\\ •'• * IfVfc N *. • *•• *.•. %itf ‘v. X < .#;•# % 4*«l A ^ mt •••.•• ,,^ ^ d •• • / y/ •j^yy A-'- Hyt i {■^■M'n4r n-.M.& '?« : ra /|..f- S5 .ei • •». ««Vi » • ^ • *•“H • FI? u' g /,•■ v' -'»^*‘.: '•»'*. “ *r s; • Si •{ •J H^** k»4* •>*|Wv^ 4 m « '. \\ : • I'^jj (~ I- t • •V^ »• • V rn> •• <VWi '*/.*>* • I* «’ J I :C4 X . * \ • \ #\ • \ \ ♦u» 4 < k t‘iM k k.'W « • • C/V • *•»• • •/ ••• 4« M ...[!! ■z'^ ••-V', I V.v--^. P^:.^ *'• ' ‘•• •'‘ y J .'/ '. ’.'// •«.» •kU 4 ••• •... r—^--1.^ 2.r. '. —•^•. /' ----- -----•••^'N •,().! ^ .• ■• i‘ •• - • •-5C ' iiln y ;-\\l / 1-'^ #jc:f4' ./ /., . /.. A. \ • . . V r '.44 «f4#*f « . 4 I rt»; 0 / ip K s J 4M4 •..•. ••* //'• - i / • ■ ' .•.■• y\: f / \\ ^• • .. •..' / / .■• •■. • • / 'f . - • • ■ «tM W • Y’. . . •• . ^ •• • • «Y: i c\ 'I *.....) ( ) NOTES fll'iS ....(' U'vJ - liunkcr Inlbrnuition jyi>Jy/AV v5*' tmiM % Pl|% ) I » ) \ mmm msem / sil w ?M <^. • r!?5 ■% 1 li* ^£1 •••>Ww I ft m¥ Ifi»5|jmsm, LI Me nsm>B ®Ji|..'3si^ia i • ■’' > 'r\m.•';i;V-.T' mmm )l H { Wtm ‘imw-'-,E. / V FEATU i I i.*\kiut *1 n • J • iMi*- .1 ’I tilllS|il.lt*ff I AHUTMIsN'r W ^ OTES kinkcr Inrormalion L CITYofOBONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^ X 4 b_______ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03 SUBDIVISIONS 19-21 FILE NO. 2398 • WHEREAS, Wayzata Countiy Club (hereinafter the "applicant") is ov,Tier of the property located at 2C0 West Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: EXHIBIT ’A’ ATTACHED (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application for a conditional use permit for land alterations regulated under Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21 for the purpose of constructing or reconstructing tecs and bunkers, and to permit the expansion of 3 pond areas on the propert>‘. Mirmesota: 1. 2. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2398. The property is located in the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 17, 1998 and recommended approval of the conditional use permit for the tee and bu^cr construction/reconstruction elements of the proposal based on the following findings. a. The tee and bunker plan involves reconstruction of existing tees and bunkers and/or the creation of new tecs and bunkers on each of holes #1-18. Page 1 of 6 CITYofORONO b. c. d. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CC JNCIL NO. ^ ^ ~ ^ No parts of the tee and bunker plan involve excavation within designated City wetlands or in wetlands designated by the National Wetland Inventory. Each of the many individual grading projects (which as a group comprise the tee and bunker plan) appear from the submitted grading plans to have no impact on neighboring properties, and none will result in changes in the characteristics of the watershed A majority of individual projects v.ill involve fill in amounts less than 500 cubic yards. The proposed expansion of ponds on holes #5,6 &12 will require additional detailed review as well as potentially require permits from other agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands. The ponds on #6 and #12 are NWI wetlands and that on #6 is also a City-protected wetland. e.The proposed tee and bunker construction/reconstruction program is intended by the applicant to take place over a period of years, and it would be appropriate that the City approve the entire master plan for such construction/ reconstruction and allow City staff to issue a separate land alteration permit each year to the applicant for project elements proposed for that year, without requiring additional Planning Commission or Council review. 4. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Plarming Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for the construction and/or reconstruction of tees and bunkers as proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety o'" general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 6 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 1 4 _____ CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21 to permit the construction and/or reconstruction of tees and bunkers per the Master Plan by John Fought Design dated December 5, 1997. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The tee and bunker reconstructions are approved per the submitted plans, subject to issuance of a land alteration permit to be obtained annually by Wayzata Country Club prior to commencing that specific year's projects. Any plan revisions would, at staff discretion, be subject to further Planning Commission/Council review. The submittal for each year’s plans shall include a more detailed survey for those portions of the course where grading will be near lot lines, to ensure that lot lines are staked and that grading will not encroach within 5' of those lot lines. The applicant is advised to have this concept plan revieweci oy, as a minimum, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the DNR and the City of Wayzata to establish whether any additional approvals are required for the tee or bunker program by those agencies. All grading work shall be subject to conformance with the "Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas", and proper erosion controls and immediate revegetation of all disturbed areas shall be required. The ponds to be expanded on holes #5,6, and 12 are specifically ns2l included in tWs approval. Land alteration work involved with these pond expansions will require additional engineering detail and review by other jurisdictional agencies prior to approval. Note that specifically in the case of the pond on hole if 6, the expansion of the pond requires a variance since it is a City-protected w'etland. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the o^vner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for an initial annual land alteration permit within one year of the date of Council's approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will exphe on that date (August 24,1999). Page 3 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4 14 6NO. 7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8.The imdersigned authoii2ed representative of Wayzata Country Club has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. • • Page 4 of 6 trNiiS iC'fcC^T'KSl City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2592_________ 2£/ M a^9i A RESOLDTIOH GRAHTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03f SUBDIVISION 19 PILE #1379 WHEREAS, Wayzata Country Club (hereinafter •! owner of property located at 200 Kayrata Boulevard located within the City of Orono (hereinafter *’City”) and legally described as follows. Exhibit A (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the Conditional Use Permit to permit the excavation of a removal of approximately 2,500 cubic yards of fill, Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1, This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1379. course under an existing Conditional Use Permit. 3. On February 21, 1989 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application and recommended approval as proposed, ^he proposed pond is not located in a wetland area, and water storage on the Golf Course property, thereby providing g benefit to the watershed. 4. The City Council finds that granting ^ tc allow the excavation of the proposed pond will not ® ® would not the health, safety or general welfare of dancer tc adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or ^ neighborin,. properties, nor will it depreciate surroun ^ if values and that the proposed level of use of Code anc keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Cod Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 1 of 4 Cityof OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2592_________ CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to permit the construction of a pond along the east side of Fairway #12 of the Kayzata Country Club Golf Course, subject to the following conditions: 1. Spoils shall be placed at the applicants regular fill site in the City of Wayzata. Applicant is advised to obtain whatever permits may be necessary from the City of Wayzata for the regular fill site. If that site is not used and some site in Orono is proposed, the proposed fill site will need further review by the City. 2. The property owner and his grading contractors shall take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that grading and excavation of this site does not adversely affect any other drainageways in the area due to erosion or sedimentation. The disturbed areas shall be revegetated as soon as possible. 3. The property owner shall provide a legal description and grant a conservation and flowage easement over the 1/4 acre pond to be created and the adjacent 1/2 acre pond. 4. The applicant is advised to contact the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to obtain any permit they may require for construction of this pond. 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein,, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 2 of 4 pfl w-.' J city of OROINO mm^ - I - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2592_________ 1989. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of March, AT' SST* irothy J^Hallin/ City Cler Jambs R. Crabek, Mayor ^^^erty Owner(s) ^ STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )1 :Moing instrument was acknowledged before in\Ae/'4A______________' 19M-' ?y The for bo'rothy^M^ Hallin/M*ayor^& City Clerk of ^ne Ci^ of ? ”^"of®?he. • — _ _ _ _^ J J3 4 WAR on benalr or x:neSS^JcJ^at crptiStirSSd%"ai^d^ins\%'^meSt\^%%%%^cuUd o^b^ of the UL k tWMli-K. SCHEF , ' Jn/ HeNNt? IN COUNTY ‘ Mv cemirIi:Ion t«Otrtt6»V93 So«ro4s^'i<>n^^xp tp 4 Page 3 of 4 { &jxmmm city of OFtOIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2592_________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss • COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 1989 before me a Nptary Public within and for said county, personally appeared _________________________________________________________________ known to me to be^he person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. B.tirifjtllsSiosscU ■ • CoLr.:y of Ho.i.icpiii 3 ; vr**5r/;' »«/ C0frm.n»-»c C^pi»ci J ► June •• ^ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this G^d.AApy.'- NOTARY PUBLIC 9, /9S9 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES day of 198 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _____________________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 "1 r • . EXHIBIT A Eesolutlon Mo* 2592 Legal Description: The Southeast one—quarter of the Southwest one—quarter# Section 36, Township 118, Range 23, lying Southerly of WatertoWn Road (Old Long Lake Road) and Southerly of the Luce Line right- of-way, excluding road. Also known as P.I.D. No. 36-118-23 34 0001. All in Hennepin County, Minnesota. mi <SN.Q? city of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1977 _______ o A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 (C) & SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 - PILE #935 \ WHEREAS, Wayzata Country Club (hereinafter "the applicant") i the owner of the property located at 200 West Wayzata Boulevard locate within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described a follows: The southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 36 Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian excluding roads; Also known as F.I.D. f 36-118-23-43-0001 (here inafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a Conditiona Use Permit to permit certain grading projects regulated under Zoning Cod Section 10.03 Subdivision 19 and to permit construction of a shelte building per Section 10.20 Subdivision 3. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Oronc FINDINGS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #535. The property is located in • the RR~1B Single Family Fura Residential Zoning District. On July 15, 1985, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed tl application as proposed and recommended approval of the variov projects which were deemed by City staff to be of a minor natui not requiring detailed review. The City Council reviewed this application on Janua: 27, 1986 and granted conceptual approval for two project proposed to be immediately commenced in Spring 1986, directed staff to review the various projects anticipated to commenced later in 1986 and in future years. The following projects were recommended by staff for approval • April 14, 1986: a) Extension of tee #4, filling of approximately 30 cubic yar- to be spread 6" deep on high ground. Page 1 of 4 City of OR-OIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1977_________ b) Construction of low mounds on left side of fairway §1} averaging 3-5' in height, filling of approximately 75 cubi yards . c) Fill in the existing bunker on hole #13, approximately : cubic yards of fill. d) Pond on fairway #5, 25'x75'x5* deep, 350 cubic yarc excavation. e) Rebuild bunkers at rear of hole #8, approximately 1000 cub: yards of fill, all on high ground. f) Extension of the tee #17, filling of approximately 370 cub yards, all on high ground. g) Construction of a shelter building, 12'7*'xl5'7", one sto: in height, located southeast of tee #12, locat< approximately 90' from the nearest property line, a requiring no variances to the zoning code. 6. The proposed projects are located in the upper reach of the watershed; runoff from this area travels thoughts seri of swales, ditches, and wetlands before reaching Lake Minneton an approximate distance of 1 mile away; the proposed projec are insignificant within the overall watershed and will have significant effect on the quality or quantity of runoff wat entering Lake Minnetonka. 7. The City Council has considered the application including t findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, repoi by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the communit' 8. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit allow the proposed excavation and construction projects will r be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of t public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose f " hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor wi doreciate surrounding property values and that the propoi 1 vel of use of the property will be in keeping with the in^' and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council her grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section fei! m City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1977 Subdivision 3 (C) to permit the construction of a shelter building and per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to permit certain excavation, fill and grading projects, subject to the following conditions: 1. The following excavation, grading, and filling projects are hereby approved subject to the applicant obtaining a grading permit once each year for projects to be completed in that year: a) Extension of tee #4, approximately 30 cubic yards of fill. # b) Construction of low mounds on left side of fairway #11, filling of approximately 75 cubic yards. c) Fill in the existing bunker on hole #13, approximately 2C cubic yards of fill. d) Pond on fairway #5, 350 cubic yards excavation. e) Rebuild bunkers at rear of hole #8, approximately 1000 cubic yards of fill. f) Extension of the tee #17, filling of approximately 370 cubic yards. 2. Proper plans must be submitted to the building department foi review and a building permit for the shelter building must bf obtained prior to commencement of construction. 3. 4. 5. 6. All filled, graded or excavated areas shall be protected fror causing sediment erosion into adjacent waterways by method.* deemed appropriate by the City Inspector until such time that tht areas in question are revegetated. The applicant shall notify the City 24 hours in advance o; commencement of any of the projects so that the City Inspector can be present on the site as neceessary. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms an< conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of th Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority grante herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees t the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of thi resolution in the chain of title of the property. City of ORQNO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO._JiIZ__ Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of April, allin/City Clerk MaryMarv C. Butl r. Mayor (1) Property Owner . Page 4 of 4 mm iMiim City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L •NO. 1977______ STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this 4^day of ArPiS.tL^1986 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared SLtpn fbeJjit-fM. known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) s s • COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this day of 1986, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Application Date: 9/08/99 Completion Date: 9/08/99 60 Day Deadline: 11/07/99 Review date extended to: 1/06/00 meeting NOV ? 2 1999 Cl I r \jr UfiO/vO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 11/18/99 ITEM NO Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2525 Larry Jacobson/Vickie O'Neill 635 Femdale Road North Variance Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre) Lot Area:87,410 s.f. (2.01 acres) Application: The applicants proposal to construct a detached garage on the north side of their home was tabled at the October 18,1999 Planning Commission meeting. The applicants have now' proposed to construct a two stall attached garage to the north side of their house. The proposed attached garage is 612 s.f. and located 13.9 ’ from the side property line. The property is unusual that it currently has two curb cuts that connect an U-shaped driveway. The requested variance is for: 1 . Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (B): Lot yard requirements: To permit a side yard variance to allow a two stall attached garage to be located 13.9 ’ where 30' is required from the side lot line. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote to: Approve the application as presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE #2525 WHEREAS, Larry G. Jacobson and Victoria A. OTMeill (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the propert>' located at 635 Femdale Road North within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: That part of Government Lot 3, Section 36, Township 118, Range 23 lying North of a line parallel with and 269.6 feet North, measured at right angles, from the south line of said Government Lot 3, lying Westcily of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point 675 feet South of the North line of said Lot (said North line being assumed to have a bearing of East for purposes of this description) and 830.75 feet West of the East line of said Lot; thence South 56 degrees 10 minutes West, 58.6 feet; thence South 55 degrees 29 minutes West, 50 feet; thence South 15 degrees 27 minutes West, 17.9 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence South 15 degrees 27 minutes West 32.1 feet; thence South 8 degrees 56 minutes West to said line parallel with and 269.6 feet North of, measured at right angles to the south line of said lot, and there ending; and lying Southerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at said "Point A"; thence South 69 degrees 27 minutes West, 140 feet; thence North 74 degrees West, 400 feet; thence on a bearing of West, 100 feel; thence South 30 degrees \\’est, 100 feet; thence on a bearing of West for 1000 feet; and there ending, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Plamiing Codes, the Orono Plarming Commission held a public hearing on November 15, 1999, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and Page 1 of 6 WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit a side yard setback variance to allow a 612 s.f. two stall attached garage to be located 13.9' where 30' is required from the side lot line. Minnesota: 1. 5. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS t'his application was reviewed as Zoning File #2525. The property is located in the RR-IB Zoning District, where 2 acres or 87,120 s.f. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of 2.01 acres or 87,410 s.f. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 15, 1999 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A.The construction of the garage will not exceed the allowable hardcover for the 75-250’ zone, the total hardcover for this zone after the garage addition will be 7,694 s.f. (13.4%). The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this propert)' are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preseive a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 6 i«BAk I I U.'ltCll . I • L.. U f k,UVUJ h.iAi ^ ^ 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit a side yard setback variance to allow a 612 s.f. two stall attached garage to be located 13.9' where 30' is required from the side lot line. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 22, 2000). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 6 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of November 22, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregcing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of November, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of t*"' City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR LARRY JACOBSON IN GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 36-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA < H Ha Lyciiarc/ Ro.mf t907r £«f# #*>• •f 4»» « i«# 3 *• 4.## J •Ptoin< 'A' |P#«^ :> #».• Jci lY o So COcu CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 ZONING FILE # 2525 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 11/16/99 TO: Larry Jacobson/Vickie O’Neill 635 Femdale Road North Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING 1 1/15/99 VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council on November 22,1999 at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. / TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner November 10,1999 SUBJECT: #2525 Larry Jacobson 635 N. Femdale Road Variance -- Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-1B One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre) Lot Area:93,185-5,775(easement)= 87,410 s.f.(2,01 acres) This application requires the following variance: Section 10.28, Subd. S (B): Side yard Setback Regulations: To permit a side yard setback variance to allow an attached garage to be located 13.9' where 30' is required from the side lot line. Application Summary: The applicant's proposal to construct a detached garage on the north side of his home was tabled at the October 18,1999 Planning Commission meeting. The applicant has submitted a new proposal for an attached garage on the north side of his home. The proposed attached garage is 612 s.f and located 13.9' from the side property line. The property is unusual that it currently has two curb cuts that connect a U-shaped driveway. The applicant seeks approval of a variance for side yard setback for the garage to be located 13.9' from the side yard where 30' is required. U2525 Larry Jacobson 635 N. FernJale Road Variance n/10/99 page-1 ANALYSIS Lot Area: RR-IB Lot Area Required 2 acre (87,120 s.f.) Existing 2.01 acre (87,410 s.f.) Hardcover Calculations: Distance from shoreline Total Area in Setback Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 75 ’-250'54,900 s.f.13.725 s.f. (25%)6,802 s.f. (12.4%)7,414 s.f.(13.5?/o) Statement of Hardship: The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1. The lot is heavily wooded with mature trees. The applicant wishes to leave them. 2. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the variance for side yard setback for the attached garage. tt2525 Larry Jacobson 6i5 N. Fcrndale Road Variance 11/10/99 page-2 Attachments A Application B Letter from applicant C Site Plan/Survey D Plat Map E Location Map F Hardcover Worksheet G Planning Commission minutes (10/18/99) H Property Owner's List I Permit Record J Neighbor ’s letter from previous proposal H2525 Larrv Jacobson 635 N. Ferndale Road Variance 11/10/99 page-3 A Application # c>tS3.^ Date Received *9 / $/-/*-/ Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPUCATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from ori^al application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION . , xv, ______ Site Address A/. ^VAC>^ * J Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ^^-))S^-*'2.3-)l-C>oC*^__________________ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Pro perty Acquired Ocjy ______________________________^(month/year) I (do) <Cdon^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: >( residential Other (specify). Zoning District: \ 1“^^p-hr / v.\i( i\ APPLICANT . Name I ia^________________________________ Phonelwork ) 4>I2.- Address: a/ City: ^oyz.oi'hK._______Zip:__SS2l! «.Q OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _____Ui^‘ Phone (home) Address: __Ov:^. City:_ Phone (work) 6/2.-NH^-72.'7^ Zip:_____ •sr^ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 1^,0 00 Describe request in detail: t> h cc ____________ Cl 1. • • (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback: ^ Front X Side Hardcover Rear Other (specify) PLot Coverage a |*^ Average Lakeshore HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing comnliance with Zoning Code requirements;^ __ ___ -r /year) 3-] \ .'7'^ L\ HARDSHI/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS We live on a private drive with 15 other homes. Almost all have 3+ garages. Our home has been appraised by the City of Orono for tax purposes at $370,000. We are at a hardship to sell our home for the appraised value with a two car garage. In addition, we need storage for a 19 ft. boat and a third car. The property only allows for an additional garage on the north side of the property, no other workable location exists. The south side has a high water table zuid drainage ditch, the east is close to the common road, and the west has no easy access because of the location of the septic tanks and drain fields. The temporary structure for the boat on our property is, also, not attractive to our neighbors. ’•'J )verage « ^eshore ) r renting <o CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR LARRY JACOBSON IN GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 36-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Lydiorcf rcceWoL (Vu ) •1075'Mftf frm» Um9 . %( 4#»’« 4## I i73* , f>j0rth l.mt 0^ ^0^'f L0f 3 Point M706 i ••300 -Knar^A ®!*^* ■•.••>..f^v «. : *’ ; •'^ *‘ ■ * Wayzata j}?5& I-; .Vi Country Club g • ^ • •• • • ^ NttNUlO ®# La lU a Skk M( Q IDSCWOg £50^ FERNOALf /^ / -V.. . . W'ayza/a ■ I “ " / -■ "f-.?:- .-■- Bay • ■;’: .S k- ‘.'.J ^ . • • •: r .•> •r *•: • •. •. ••\ . V. r • - • w - * * ♦ & > * fy • • X* • ;• . Lookout , Point Q ‘HbfJFiK^ ■ *v. ■ ‘- 'V''*• ■ • •• * • ^ .• X .• • • • k. • •• • yp ■ ■ ■ 7 • 4 ' • ..• ' r %. • . - :. t . tJ f ; ^L .j p / t HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ FYISTINC HARnCOVFR IN ZONE A. House 250-500' Length /3 X X X Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other ZU 22.ue X X X X X X X X X /a ^jD TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A -5- B 5¥. ncO_ xlOO PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ____________ X _______________ Length Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Dcck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other X X X c20 X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 7^/^ B 5W. XlOO 500-1000' /77L S.F. 3/2- TJL^ (cm I ^^6 LOOT. 5)-b S.F. S.F. S.F. S.'F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ^S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S^/.^CC S.F. /a. ■St % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ’S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. r A B (ciCO> nmH 6^/ ^(Ti 13 5 S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B &ou) ORONO PLANNING COM>nSSION MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 18,1999 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chair Eiizabeth Hawn, Commissioners William Stoddard, Dale Lindquist. Janice Berg, Sandra Smith, Jay Nygard, and Daniel Kluth. The following represented City Staff: Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Senior Planning Coordinator Mike Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, and Recorder Jackie Young. Council Member Charles Kelley was present. Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS (#1) #2525 LARRY JACOBSON AND VICKIE O’NEILL, 635 FERNDALE ROAD NORTH- VARIANCE, 6:31 p.m. • 6:44 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Larry Jacobson, Applicant, was present. Bottenberg stated the Applicant is proposing to construct a detached garage on the north side of his home. The detached garage will be 569 square feet and located eight feet from the property line. The property is unusual in that it currently has two curb cuts that connect an U-shaped driveway. Variances to side yard setback are required for the garage to be located eight feet from the side yard where ten feet is required and to permit a crowding principal building variance to allow a detached garage to be located eight feet where ten feet is required from the principal building. Jacobson slated he has attempted to design the location of the garage in a site which would require the minimum amount of variances, but due to their odd-shaped lot. a variance is needed to the side yard setback. Jacobson commented he does have a signed statement from the neighbor indicating that they are not opposed to the project. Hawn requested that the statement be included in the record. Jacobson indicated that in his opinion this is the best location for the garage, noting that the west side has a drainage easement and would require the removal of a number of trees. Jacobson stated they are requesting the detached garage for storage reasons. Hawn read into the record a letter from Dick and Joan Strand. 645 Ferndale Road North, indicating that they are not opposed to the project but do have a question regarding the difference between a detacned g^'age versus an attached garage. The Strands would prefer an attached garage. Jacobson stated that an attached garage would require a larger variance. Page 1 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 18,1999 (Ain) (#2525 Larry Jacobson, Continued) Lindquist inquired how far the detached garage wouid be from the residence. Jacobson stated that the garage would be located eight feet from the residence. Smith inquired whether the garage could be downsized somewhat to reduce the need for a variance. Stoddard advised the Applicant to check with City Staff to determine whether a fire wall is needed due to the closeness of the garage to the residence. Stoddard stated he would like to see the garage conform to the side lot setback if possible. Hawn stated in order for an variance to be granted, a hardship has to be demonstrated, which has not been shown In her opinion. Hawn commented personally she would not be opposed to attaching the garage to eliminate the need for a variance to the side yard setback. Kluth commented that normally a hardship is due to the topography of the land. Jacobson stated they would prefer an attached garage but it would require a greater variance. Jacobson submitted a drawing depicting an attached garage. Lindquist commented he would be in agreement with an attached garage, but that an updated survey is needed. Hawn stated that the Planning Commission has to vote on the plan that is before them tonight, but that an option would be for this application to be tabled in order to allow the Applicant time to submit a revised plan showing an attached garage. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that an attached garage would be preferred. Hawn commented that a plan for an attached garage would still need to be submitted and reviewed by the Planning Commission before it can be approved. Lindquist inquired whether the Applicant would like his application tabled tonight. Jacobson indicated that would be fine. There were no public comments. Motion by Lindquist, second by Kluth, to table Application #2525, 635 Ferndale Road North, to allow the Applicant time to submit a revised plan for an attached garage. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. (#2) #2527'MU45JEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT^EAINTER’S CREEK BETWEEN SOUTH KATRINXTWARSH^ND COUNTY ROAD>--eOT«5mONAL USE PERMIT, 6:45 p.m. 7:02 p.m. The Certificate of Mailim ffidavit of Publication led. Rodne'CWenck Associates, Consulting Engineer, and Eric Evenson/^!ireg^. Page 2 r > t RUN DATE RA/ll/T? X HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIA3SA01 PACE 50 ■ATCH SOS PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 30 3A-110-23 U 0007 00SO5 FERNOALE RD N DANIEL D DANIELSON ETAL DANIEL D DANIELSON 505 NORTH FERNOALE RO WAYZATA MN 55391 30 30-110-23 11 0009 00035 FERNOALE RD N L JACOBSON OVA O’NEILL LARRY JACOBSON VICTORIA A O’NEILL 035 FERNOALE RD N ORONO MN 55391 30 30-110-23 11 0010 00005 FERNOALE RD N RICHARD E STRAND ETAL RICHARD E 0 JOAN N STRAND 005 NO FERNOALE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 30 30-110-23 11 0011 000'«& FERNOALE RO N RICHARD E STRAND ETAL RICHARD E 0 JOAN M STRAND 005 FERNOALE RO N WAYZATA MN 55391 30 30-110-23 11 0020 00030 ADDRESS UNASS16NED KAREN BELDEN FREY WILLIAM R COBB 793 FERNOALE OR N WAYZATA MN 55391 30 30-11B-23 11 0029 00027 FERNOALE RO N BONNIE D JOHNSON BONNIE 0 JOHNSON 027 FERNOALE RD N WAYZATA 104 55391 30 30-110-23 11 0031 00029 FERNOALE RO N J R THOMAS SNA THOMAS JOSEPH R S NANCY A THOMAS 029 FERNOALE RO N WAYZATA MN 55391 SB 30-110-23 12 0002 00725 FERNOALE RD N M J SOWAOA SMB SOWADA MICHAEL J/HAR6ARET B SOWAOA 725 FERNOALE RO N WAYZATA MN 55391 30 30-110-23 12 0000 00735 FERNOALE RD N R 0 0 L VIAULT RAYMOND 0 0 LUCILLE VIAULT 735 FERNOALE RO N WAYZATA MN 55391 SB 30-110-23 IS 0001 00030 ADDRESS UNASS16NED STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES TAX SPEC BUREAU OF RE NOT BOO LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL MN S5155 TOTAL BATCH SOS 00010 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF IlffORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE I a October 17, 1999 To: Orono Planning Commission: From: Dick and Joan Strand, 645 Femdale Rd. N, We have reviewed the proposed application for Larry Jacobson/Vickie O’Neill, 635 Ferndale Rd. N, application # 2525. The side yard variance requested effects our south property line. We have no objection to the requested variance. We understand that the request includes a variance for the detached garage to be 8 Ft. versus 10 Ft. from the principle structure and for the side setback to be 8 Ft. versus 10 Ft. We do, however, question the rationale for the differences between the side yard variance for a detached garage (10 Ft.) versus an attached garage (30 Ft). In our opinion, as a neighbor, it would be preferred to have an attached structure. In conclusion, we have no objection to the proposed variance application for Jacobson/O ’Neill, #2525. Signature: Application Date: Completion Date: Application Deadline: 9/21/99 9/21/99 1/18/00 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION >MCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 1999 • y OH OHONO DATE: 11/19/99 ITEM NO. = ^ Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2530 William Wear 2160 Wayzata Boulevard Variances for Signaee Zoning District:B-1 Retail Sales Business District Exhibits A Draft Resolution B Proposed Sign Plan for Conoco Station C Staff Report Application Summary Mr. Wear has applied to the City of Orono for a variance to permit total signage of 380 s.f. on the property where 100 s.f. is permitted. The Plaiming Commission reviewed a comprehensive sign plan for the property that would permit 180 s.f. of building signage, 141 s.f. of signage for the existing twin polo pylon on the west side of the property and 59 s.f. of signage for a new' conoco logo sign on the east side of the property. The building signage includes two 2.5' x 8' conoco logos that w'ould be located on the east and west sides of tne canopy. Building Signage Each current tenant in the Orono Shopping Center would be permitted exterior signage not to exceed 30" in height to be located over the entrance. The Conoco Station would include two 2.5' x 8' = 20 s.f. signs on the canopy that would be counted toward the allowed 180 s.f. building signage. The building signage is limited to the tenant's name or logo. Conoco Pvlon The Conoco Pylon would be located on the east side of the property near the front lot line. Two poles remain on the property from a pylon that was removed. Upon issuance of a sign permit the twin poles would be required to be removed. The total signage would include a 20 s.f. conoco logo and 39 s.f. dedicated to three lines advertising gasoline prices and two lines of reader board as indicated on the plan submitted to the City of Orono. The total sign space is limited to 59 s.f. West Pvlon The west pylon was approved with variances in 1986. The sign was permitted one Logo Sign - top (Orono Shopping Center) 5' x 7.5’ = 37.S s.f. Six plaques (one plaque is allowed per tenant for advertising) 2.5' x 7.5' x 6 plaques = 112.5 s.f. Planning Commission Recommendation The applicant reduce the signage on the property to allow 380 s.f.. which the property would be allowed if the zoning matched the use of the property. The Planning Commission made the following findings: 1. 2. 3. The use of the property is more in conformance with that listed in the "B-3" Shopping Center District. If the property is zoned B-3 the lot would be allowed 380 s.f. of sign space. A variance could be justified based on the use of the property is similar to that of a property in the B-3 District. The Planning Commission noted in 1986 the applicable B-1 zoning standards are not compatible with existing shopping center use and since 1980 B-3 shopping standards were found more appropriate when considering signage needs of the property. The Conoco station, as well as many other tenants, use an exterior entrance rather than a typical interior entrance associated with other malls. It may be appropriate to approve additional signage based on this need. Highway 12 will be relocated from the existing location reducing the amount of regional traffic to local traffic. The signage along old Highway 12 should be in character with the local traffic use and pedestrian users. Staff Recommendation Staff could recommend approval of variances based on the signage proposed would be allowed under the existing Ordinance if the property would be zoned B-3. This application requires the following variance: 1. Section 10.61, Subdivision 3 (A): Within the B-1 District the aggregate square footage of sign space per lot shall not exceed the sum of one square foot for each front foot of building, plus one square foot for each front foot of lot not occupied by a building. No individual sign shall exceed 50 square feet. The property is allowed a total of 200 s.f. of signage based on frontage and building width along the front property line being 200 feet. The property owner has applied for a variances to allow 380 s.f of signage on the property, primarily for the new Conoco Station. The plan for a 59 s.f pylon is attached as Exhibit D. Two Conoco Logos (Exhibit E) are proposed to be located on the canopy (2.5' x 8' each) totaling 40 s.f The pylon encroaches into the front yard setback. Based on Resolution No. 2073, adopted by the Orono City Council on November 10. 1986, the property is allowed the following: A. Building Signage 12 individual tenant signs to be located on the building. Each sign is allowed to be 2' x 12' = 24 s.f. The total building signage was approved for 288 s.f. B. West pylon sign (Existing) Logo Sign - top {Orono Shopping Center) 5' x 7.5' = 37.5 s.f. Six plaques (one plaque is allowed per tenant for advertising) 2.5' X 7.5' X 6 plaques = 112.5 s.f. C. East pylon sign (Advertising has been removed, pylons remain on property) Logo Sign - top {time and temperature digital display) 3' x 7.5' = 22.5 s.f. Six plaques (one plaque is allowed per tenant for advertising) 2.5' X 7.5' X 6 plaques = 112.5 s.f. D. Total signage permitted on site per Resolution No. 2073 = 573 s.f. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.61, SUBDIVISION 3 (A) FILE NO. #2530 WHEREAS, William W. Wear and Mable Wear (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 2160 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: The West 200 feet of that part of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 34, Township 18, Range 23 described as commencing at the Northwest corner of said East Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence due south (assumed bearing) along the West Line of said East Half of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 1311.29 feet; thence South 87 degrees 41 minutes East, 545.87 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 87 degrees 41 minutes West, 200 feet; thence North 2 degrees 19 minutes East, 188.93 feet; thence North 87 degrees, 41 minutes West, 200 feet; thence South 2 degrees 19 minutes West, 334.96 feet to the Northerly right of way line of State Highway No. 12; thence South 69 degrees 41 minutes East along said Northerly right of way line 45.94 feet; thence Easterly 364.3 feet along said Northerly right of way line being a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 1587.28 feet to an intersection with a line bearing South 2 degrees 19 minutes West from the actual point of beginning; thence North 2 degrees 19 minutes East, 232.24 feet to actual point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning r^odes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on October 18, 1999 and November 15, 1999 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.61, Subdivision 3(A) to permit total signage on the property to be 380 Page 1 of 6 s.f. where 200 s.f. is allowed for this property in the B-1 zoning district. This signage plan requires the following variance to the B-1 zoning district standards for signage. Section 10.61, Subdivision 3 (A) - Allowed area for signage in the B-1 district. Allowed = 200 s.f. Proposed = 380 s.f. Variance = 90% Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, 1. 2. 3. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2530. The property is located in the B-1 Business District. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1998 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0 for a variance based upon the following findings: A. The use of the property is more in conformance with that listed in the ''B-3" Shopping Center District. If the property is zoned B-3 the lot would be allowed 380 s.f of sign space. A variance could be justified based on the use of the property is similar to that of a propert>' in the B- 3 District. The Planning Commission noted in 1986 the applicable B-1 zoning standards are not compatible with existing shopping center use and since 1980 B-3 shopping standards were found more appropriate when considering signage needs of the property. B. The Conoco station, as well as many other tenants, use an exterior entrance rather than a typical interior entrance associated with other malls. It may be appropriate to approve additional signage based on this need. C. Highway 12 will be relocated from the existing location reducing the Page 2 of 6 amount of regional traffic to local traffic. The signage along old Highway 12 should be in character with the local traffic use and pedestrian users. D. The Conoco pylon shall not be located closer than 10 feet to any lot line. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.61, Subdivision 3(A) to permit total signage on the property to be 380 s.f. where 200 s.f. is allowed for this property in the B-1 zoning district. This signage plan requires the following variance to the B-1 zoning district standards for signage. Section 10.61, Subdivision 3 (A) - Allowed area for signage in the B-1 district. Allowed = 200 s.f. Proposed = 380 s.f Variance - 90% 1. The signage on the property shall be limited to 180 s.f of signage for the building. a) Two 2.5' X 8' conoco logos, one each <br the east and west sides of the canopy = 40 s.f. Page 3 of 6 2. 3. 4. 5. b) 140 s.f. of signage limited to each tenant in the building's name or logo. No individual sign shall be greater than 30" in height and shall be located above the entrance(s) for each current tenant. One east pylon shall be allowed for the Conoco Station. The pylon shall be allowed one 2.5' x 8' = 20 s.f. conoco logo, one 1.5' x 6' tenant's name for the gas station = 9 s.f.. three lines identifying types of gasoline for sale and price 21 s.f. and 1.5' x 6* two line, changeable reader board = 9 s.f.. One west pylon shall be allowed six plaques 2.5' x 7.5' = 18.75 s.f x 6 plaques = 112.5 s.f one individual plaque is allowed per current tenant, limited to tenant's name or logo and one logo sign 5' x 7.5' 37.5 s.f to identify the shopping mall, not to exceed 141 s.f. as exists the date of this resoltion. All signage for the property shall be in conformance with the conditions set forth in this resolution by March 31, 2000. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be e.xercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 22, 2000V Violation of or non-compliance with any oi the lerms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 4 of 6 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of November, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owners ■ '-l;. 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of November, 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 6 of 6 ife 8 ’ xonocoj WESTERN CONVENIENCE Unleaded 1.15 ( Unleaded Plus 1.19 Premium Unleaded 1.23 2 -6" 20 sq ft r-6” 9 sq ft 3’-6” 21sqft r-6" 9sqtt r-6"59 sq ft total GO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner November 9, 1999 #2530 William Wear 2160 Wayzata Boulevard Variances for Signage _____ Zoning District:B-1 Retail Sales Business District Exhibit A B C D E F G H I J Application Plat Map Site Survey Proposed pylon sign plan Proposed canopy sign plan Site photos Sign survey completed by Suburban Lighting, Inc. Section 10.61, Subdivision 3 Resolution No. 2073 Revised sign plan (for consideration) The Planning Commission tabled the request by William Wear to locate new signage on the property not in conformance with the Resolution approving a sign plan in 1986. The applicant had proposed a 59 s.f pylon sign and two conoco, canopy signs. The monument sign has been reduced from 89 s.f. The Planning Commission reviewed the signage on the property and determined there was a substantial amount of signage that was not in conformance with the requirements of Resolution 2073. It was recommended the applicant revise the sign plan *o allow 380 s.f. which the property would be allowed if the zoning matched the ise of the property The Planning Commission made the following findings: 1.The use of the property is more in conformance with that listed in the "B-3" Shopping Center District. If the property Is zoned B-3 the lot would be allowed 380 s.f of sign space. A variance could be justified based on the use of the property is similar to that of a property in the B-3 District. The Planning Commission noted in 1986 the applicable B-1 zoning standards are not compatible with existing shopping center use and since 1980 B-3 shopping standards were found more appropriate when considering signage needs ot the property. §2530 n'llliam tt’tar 2160 H'o}~ata Bhd 11/15/99 Page I 2. The Conoco station, as well as many other tenants, use an exterior entrance rather than a typical interior entrance associated with other malls. It may be appropriate to approve additional signage based on this need. This application requires the following variances: 1. SecHon 10.61, Subdivision 3 (A): Within the B-1 District the aggregate square footage of sign space per lot shall not exceed the sum of one square foot for each front foot of building, plus one square foot for each front foot of lot not occupied by a building. No individual sign shall exceed 50 square feet. The property is allowed a total of 200 s.f. of signage based on frontage and building width along the front property line being 200 feet. The property owner has applied for a variances to allow 380 s.f of signage on the property, primarily for the new Conoco Station. The plan for a 59 s.f. pylon is attached as Exhibit D. Two Conoco Logos (Exhibit E) are proposed to be located on the canopy (2.5' x 8' each) totaling 40 s.f. The pylon encroaches into the front yard setback. Based on Resolution No. 2073, adopted by the Orono City Council on November 10, 1986, the property is allowed the following: A. Building Signage 12 individual tenant signs to be located on the building. Each sign is allowed to be 2 ’ x 12' = 24 s.f The total building signage was approved for 288.8,f, B. West pylon sign (Existing) Logo Sign - top (Orono Shopping Center) 5' x 7.5' = 37.5 s.f. Six plaques (one plaque is allowed per tenant for advertising) 2.5' X 7.5' X 6 plaques = 112.5 s.f. C. East pylon sign (Advertising has been removed, pylons remain on property) Logo Sign - top (time and temperature digital display) 3' x 7.5' = 22»5 §»£ Six plaques (one plaque is allowed per tenant for advertising) 2.5' X 7.5 ’ X 6 plaques = 112.5 s.f. D. Total signage permitted on site per Resolution No. 2073 = 573 s.f. The request is to allow a sign plan that would permit the property 180 s.f of'building' sign space. Included in the building sign space would be 40 s.f of signage on the canopy for two 2.5' x 8' = 20 s.f Conoco logos. Tenants would be allowed one building sign above entrance to each business, except businesses which are in the center of the mall or located on the south end of the mall. Each building sign would not be allowed to e,xceed 30" in height. The Planning Commission should discuss the west pylon on the property. The existing approval allows only the tenant's name or logo to appear on the sign. The Commission should consider the future of signs on the pylon that are not in conformance or allowed by variance, and if signs should be allowed to be replaced once removed as any non-conforming structure or sign may not. H25SO miliarn Wear 2160 H'ay’zata Bhd n/ism Page 2 2.Section 10.40, Subdivision 6 (C): Front Yards. The minimum front yard shall be 20 feet. The west pylon was approved 5' off the west property line and 10' from the front property line. The east pylon was approved 27' from the front property line. The east pylon was located within the front yard setback. Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.61, Subdivision 3: Signs in "B" Districts. Existing Signage Suburban Lighting Inc. had completed a sign inventor} on the property (Exhibit F). The survey indicates some signage on the building would not be pemitted under the Resolution adopted in 1986. Existing Building Signage East Side MILK (Us.f.) BREAD (16s.f.) EGGS (12s.f.) MALL (6s.f.) On page 3 of Resolution No. 2073, Paragrapli 3 states "Building signage shall be limited to current tenant's name or logo, Building signage must be brought into conformance by May 31, 1989." Orono Coin Laundry (25 s.f.) The building signage is allowed to be 2' x 12' = 24 s.f. Red Apron (35 s.f.) Rowlette & Assoc. (11 s.f.) Existing Twin Pole Sign (141 s.f.) This pylon is in conformance with the staged sign plan approved. West Side TLG Classy Canine (20 s.f.) Sunlife Tanning (16 s.f.) MALL (6 s.f.) ' Orono Coin Laundry (25 s.f.) The Variances approved allow one building sign per tenant. William Wear 2160 Wayzata Bhd It/iy99 Page 3 ANALYSIS The approvals granted in 1986 assumed the current location for Highway 12. Highway 12 will be relocated to the south parallel with the railroad tracks reducing existing Highway 12 from a major highway route to a local arterial. There has been some interest in scaling back future development of signage to accommodate a local arterial street rather than a State Highway. The concept of monument style signs can be seen along the highway at Super America and McDonald’s in Long Lake. The proposed sign is designed to be 1 O' 6" in height, in contrast to the 26’ it was approved to be under the previous development plan. The height can be compared to the Super America sign which is 13' 10" in height. It can be argued the previous proposal would allow the existing pylon to the w'est to remain as well as any building signage as permitted by Resolution No. 2073. The only change to the plan would be the replacement of a sign which does require a variance for location and allowable sign space. The most appropriate way to resolve the issue would be to approve variances for a signage plan to allow the building allotment of signage and the west pylon to remain under the previous resolution, with reduced signage for the Conoco station. Staff Recommendation Staff could recommend approval of variances based on the signage proposed would be allowed under the existing Ordinance if the property would be zoned B-3. Staff recommends the property owner show on a site plan the location of the proposed monument sign, and to design a sign and base that conforms to a smaller scale arterial street and utilizes materials used for the base of other monument signs in the locality. a2SJn n Mam Hear 2160 H'u)tafa Blvd 11/15,99 4 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 18,1999 (02529 Continued) Mot;on by Stoddard, second by KlulTOl^*®«®|j]endapproval of Application #2529, 1453 Park Drive, to permit a variance renewal lui a SIlW'yMf^i^iacenMo street setback based on the City Council's approval of Resolution #4213. VOTt?^B^*>JLNavs 0. (#8) #2530 WILLIAM WEAR, 2160 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - VARIANCES. 7:50 p.m. - 8:31 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Wi! am Wear, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant Is requesting variances to allow 129 square feet of additional signage for the new Conoco Station on the property located within the B-1 District. The B-1 zoning district allows signage based upon frontage of the property, which means that one square foot of signage is allowed per each foot of frontage on the properly, ""he property is 200 feet wide and is therefore allowed 200 feet of signage based on the frontage. The Applicant is requesting an additional 129 square feet of signage. In 1986, the City Council approved variances to permit two pylon signs, one of which has been removed except for the two support poles. The poles were approved at 26 feet in height. The proposed sign is 17 feet in height. Based on Resolution No. 2073, adopted by the Orono City Council on November 10,1986, the property Is allowed a 2' by 12* sign for each tenant of the building, for a total of 12 signs or 288 square feet. In addition, the western pylon sign was permitted with six plaques for a total of 112.5 square feel. The eastern pylon sign has been removed, but the property owner was allowed to have six plaques as well on this sign for a total of 112.5 square feel. Total signage permitted on this property per Resolution 2073 is 573 square feet. The minimum front yard setback for the pylon detached sign requires a 20 foot setback. The east pylon sign was located within the front yard setback, with the west pylon sign being approved five feet off the west property line and ten feet from the front property line. Weinberger stated that the approvals granted in 1986 assumed the current location for Highway 12. Upon relocation of Highway 12. the existing Highway 12 corridor will change from a major highway route to a local arterial The City Council has expressed some interest in reducing back future development of signage to accommodate a local arterial street rather than a state highway. One possible option to resolve this issue would te to approve variances for a signage plan to allow the building signage and the v/est pylon to remain under the previous resolution, with reduced signage for the new Conoco station. City Staff is recommending denial of the variances based on the fact the proposed signage would not be allowed under the existing Ordinance and the proposed pylon style sign would be in contrast to the character of the area. Staff is recommending that they utilize materials more in keeping with other monument signs in the area. City Staff would like to work with the owner of the Conoco station to arrive at a suitable signage plan. Weinberger slated the use of the property is more in conformance with that listed in the B-3 shopping center district If the property is zoned B-3. the lot would be allowed 380 square feet o: sign space, and a variance could be justified based on the fact the use of the property is simila' to that of a property in the B-3 district. A representative of Suburban Lighting indicated that they do have some options for reducing the Page 9 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 18,1999 («2530 William Wear. Continued) proposed sign down to 14 feet. Wear indicated that some of the existing signs could possibly be removed to reduce the total amount of signage on the property. The owner of the Conoco Station indicated that in order to compete with the other gas stations in the area, it is necessary to have as much signage as possible. Lindquist Inquired what the total square feet of signage is that exists on the building currently. Weinberger stated that cumently there is 324 square feet of signage on the property, and with the new sign being included, that would raise the total to 453 square feet. The property currently, without any variances, is allowed 200 square feet of signage. Stoddard noted that per Resolution No. 2073, the property is entitled to 573 square feet. Hawn commented that currently some of the tenants are in compliance with the signage ordinance while others are not, and that perhaps all the signs located on the property should be brought Into conformance. Wear stated that the application pertains only to the Conoco Station. Hawn stated that the Planning Commission needs to review the entire property as it pertains to the signage, and that perhaps an exception could be made in the case of the laundry tenant since they have entrances on both sides of the building. Lindquist commented that if the property were zoned B-3, they would be allowed a maximum of 383 square feet. Lindquist inquired whether there were any height restrictions on signage for this property. Weinberger stated that under City Code, they are allowed up to 22 feel on this property, with the proposed sign being 17 feet in height. Lindquist recommended that the total signage for this property be limited to 380 square feet and submit it to City Staff for their review and approval. Smith commented that the tenant signage should be consistent with the exceptioh of the laundry tenant. Hawn staled that a revised plan should be submitted giving the overall signage for the entire property, noting that the current signage is not in compliance with the previous resolution. Hawn indicated that she would be comfortable with allowing this property to have the maximum amount permitted under the B-3 zoning district. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that a revised plan should be submitted detailing the total signage for the building. Wear staled that a permit has been issued for every sign currently located on the property. Berg stated that an overall plan needs to be submitted in order to bring the entire property more in Page 10 I ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 18,1999 (#2530 William Wear, Continued) compliance. Lindquist stated he would like to table this application to allow the Applicant time to submit a revised plan, and that he would not be opposed to total signage in the amount of 380 square feet, City Council Member Kelley suggested that the Planning Commission take into consideration what they would like to see for signage along tne old Highway 12 corridor as well as the new Highway 12 corridor, along with lighting and building materials. Kelley stated that most of these guidelines were established with the understanding that Highway 12 would remain in its present location and that these issues now need to be reviewed. Motion by Lindquist, second by Smith, to table Application #2530, 2160 Wayzaia Boulevard, to allow the Applicant time to submit a revised signage plan for the entire property. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#5) wevwieiPTe APUE*ywBi»enpiwAwoe.*».»»'pwT^>it»ipt«Wiiat The Ovtificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. There were^ public comments regarding this application. Hawn stated dui^to the amount of Information involved with this revision to the ordinance. In her opinion discussionw(j^is issue would be better suited to a work session. Hawn requested that the appropriate notice^ given to the general public regarding this ordinance revision. Mel’on by Hawn, seconaih^luth, to table Application #2537, City of Orono Revision to Adult Use Ordinance to a Plahi^ing Commission work session to be scheduled this evening. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#9) #2531 ROGER AND ELIZABETH OMN, 815 PARTENWOOD ROAD - RENEWAL VARIANCES, 8:34 p.m. - 8:43 p.m. X The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of PublicatTdfi were noted. Roger Olsen. Applicant, was present. Bottenberg stated the Applicant received variances to expan^*8J^ remodel the existing residence to include a four-stall garage and additional living area. VarianciS^o lakeshore setback and hardcover were granted on October 26.1998. The Applicant is reqtt^sting that these variances be renewed. Olsen stated that he is having a difficult time retaining a contractor to do theqi^rk at a reasonable price, but that he would like to have the work completed within the next year. Smith commented that she does not see any problems with this application % There were no public comments regarding this application.X Kluth inquired whether the hardcover that was requested to be removed has in fact been X Page 11 1 AppUcation # Date ReceheT" 9/>t//yy Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial AppUcation Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORiVLmON I } ^ i / I Site Address OlLH Woil7/ia^ ^ YO. ’ Property TM^ntifiratinn'Number fP.l.D.) ~ —OOO^— Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquii‘ed_ f\//0 \/PYyiu)^ IT—1 7 ^ Quate rropeny Acquucu_______vc frwir i—^ -re------------------------------- I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Ij ^ / Present use of property: __presidential X o ther (specify) f OMtHfTO Zoning District:___ (month/year) J* •* APPLICANiT Name laivi Address:.t^bCrr iJ^Rlll t Mr Phone (home") ^I3l' ^ ~ AD30^ " ____ Phone (work ) U City: lAUf Zip:. " i* OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ^ __________ Phone (home). Phone (work). Address:City:, 'J n DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Aua Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore / Other (specify) tSt/ I (attach additional sheets if necessary) m COMd WAtIfc ""02 H t 1 »IMP. v>>CncXFOiaI 7 z (>l.^ COKIC VIALU III' I I M> /: ?»• c> Sit anti" v:i ^ n ff I* M 1-•#/ O I'* !• i7 .9 »{ < I /. 'Ii cs rn> r.o'I on /. («* .t j; r> /■) n t'l « j* >1 ..'>/-ii *y4 II ■WiTf ■C^ Pj2 cy V, /-> P- 2.5’ 2.5’ 1.5’ 2.5’ 2’ 8’ lG^n<licr! WESTERN % :i .V CONVENIENCE 3.5' ItHB. 12 HI LIQUOR >£^.. ■ •• •■ -■' - ■ ■•'. • •n*-.', •t. . ■ y.;i;t ■ ., -‘: Unleaded ^” ., . ‘ C ^ i."' » T* , . V “V* • . • ^ »Tv 't‘j ' • * • ■ ' ;» . ■ • ’. j • *r •■• *v • « . . i .* . - . ■ / •• • ' • •■ £ .*• • \ •* • :» //• . ? V. ^•• • 1v1i5 ?f.UnIea^fed'‘0:--l- ;■»,.‘-V^ .sc. i*** • H H •'Hi ■* "• • -1 ■.. 0-5lt9 i {:. *V. VtA-1 }4‘ V. ...c*;.*.''.rvi'y ■ .---"I - 1'•a A-;--?; IHHII ii i#a ‘iv^l TWO LINES OF SIX INCH COPY W-- tfn J ' • ■ ' ‘-^i >; -:S 89 so ft total 20 sq ft a- :rK."; :. '■ -ii'.'. ■■'■ T^ir - . W'‘ ®v: Wr-^ fvK';'/-'.••■• - ■ ■ T*'**' ■ " •- • ji V -■ ..-'v • ' , & :W-, 15 sq ft 21 sq ft Osq ft 9 sqft 17’ C'opoie P>iCft^ 4o «t 15 sq ft to he ^ ^ TtJO^r^^ 1^5 re i H IS SIGNAGE roENTMCATiON ^ CAPSULE SIGN PLACEMENT ON CANOPY FASCIAS Jobbers may choose from 6' and 8' single-face Conoco capsule signs to inset or surface-mount on their canopy fascia. The 6' capsule sign is to be used on vertical canopies which are 36” to 48 ” wide. The 8* is to be used on vertical canopies 48 ” and wider. Two capsule signs are permitted per canopy. While it is not mandatory at this time to mount a capsule sign on the canopy, it is recommended and will in the future become a part of the new image requirement. Canopy- mounted capsule sign cans will be painted charcoal gray. Use of the capsule sign on a mansard-style fascia is prohibited. A mansard fascia should be con­ verted to a 36” or 48 ” three- panel, two-reveal canopy giving the facility a more contemporary appearance. Jobbers should be aware that local signage codes sometimes restrict the number and size of signs by a variety of formulas to determine allowable signage. In these cases, pole-mounted cap­ sule signs take precedence over canopy or building capsule signs. Capsule Sign Placcaient on Canopy Fascia r w 6' Conoco Edge of Canopy Capsule Sign Can^are PaintedCl 2*r ------[8' 48*mmi c^onoo * '* , . O' .J . .-2 ^ k\ii 2-'-r pro ^ P £ 4 1-88 1 F /VN «. C C A-/ , ^ ^/y* u cC, »- i.I G-Cr\Y HASS' ivv; v7 vjt^' " •^i."P • . V r. V :-•>V-v aYr>7f^^ iO, t^jct u ' ■ n “f? ^ .•^r \ ■| "» pro/e>e>sc O Cot^c>(S^o <^ caJ> £ , e+- UJ . {(^ubuirban LIGHTING INC. Commercial Industrial 6077 LAKE ELMO AVE. NORTH. STILLWATER. MINN. 55082 & u) L I g AST S I O ^ ( aJo F’'. 5 l'7-oa J lip S-,. FT 12. Si). FT 11 /< —• ^r^acK - S«}<?s - O A D C otP ~ ^ S' 5^* FT fif/'OA' - -SS- S, FT u ftfYU=^ LL If^ e? u> /« H *e ^ (SS«,6^ II So FT c <.«• 5^ Ca.«oiu£ S IC> £ S u w L if ^ Tc.^>ioi«^ lfv> a LU 16. S<r »"T- - ^ 5-/ F/ % y ^ r o^> o ^olio L.aoN»^r«.{^S- Si- FT y'j * • .«\ • £,K/S Tf^<i 9(0pm Tu^l^ Po\^ - Lu, HOe Ptop^rr-^ yf7 s?. : O r M • i f.j SPECIALISTS IN LIGHTING AND SIGN MAINTENANCE. MANUFACTURING. AND INSTALLATION permitted: § 10.61 [d. 2. Signs in "R" Districts. Within "R" Districts, the following signs are SNameplates. *J>One nameplate sign tor each dwelling and such sign shall not exceed two square feet in areaperstSc^, and no sign shall be so constructed as to have more than two surfaces. 2. One namepK^ sign for each dwelling group of six or more units, and such sign shall not exceed six square feet in^ per surface and no sign shall be so constructed as to have more than two surfaces. 3. One nameplate sign for e^bli^ennined use or use by conditional permit other than residential and such sign shall not exceed tw^k(^quare feet in area per surface. B. Illumination. Symbols, statues, sculptures avHntegrated architectural features on non-residential buildings may be illuminated by flood lights pm^^d the direct source of light is not visible from the public right-of-way or adjacent residential distr^* C. Setbacks, Etc. Any sign over one-half square foot shall be setb^^ at least five feet from any property line. No sign shdl exceed eight feet m height above the avera^«.mde level. Signs may be illuminated but such lighting shall be diffused or indirect. - ^ Subd. 3. Signs in "B" and T Districts. Within the "B" and ’T’ Districts nameplate signs and business signs are permitted subject to the following regulations: Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 A. "B-l”, "B-2" and "B-4”; Size. Within the "B-1", "B-2" and ''B-4” Districts, the agcregate square footage of sign space per lot shall not exceed the sum of one square foot for each front foot of building, plus one square foot for each front foot of lot not occupied by a building. No individual sign shall exceed fifty square feet. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 B. "B-3": Size. Within the "B-3’’ District, the aggregate square footage of sign space per lot shall not exceed the sum of four square feet per front foot of building, plus one square foot per front foot of property not occupied by a building. No individual sign surface shall excee 100 square feet. ORONO CC 381 43-1-84) § 10.61 C. "I": Size. Within any "I" District, the aggregate square footage of sign space per lot shall not exceed the sum of four square feet per front foot of building, plus one square foot per front foot of property not occupied by a building. No individual sign surface shall exceed 100 square feet. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 D. "B-1", "B-2" and "B-4": Height. Within the "B-l”, "B-2" and "B-4" Districts, no sign shall extend in height more than two feet above the highest outside wall or parapet of any principal building nor shall any sign be located closer than ten feet from any property line except that any sign over ten square feet may project two feet into any required yard area from the principal building. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 E. "B-3" and "I": Height. Within any "B-3" or "I" District, no sign shall extend in height more than six feet in height above the highest outside wall or parapet of any principal building. No sign shall be located closer than ten feet from any property line except that any sign exceeding ten square feet may project only two feet into the yard area from any building. -T.. « w*. Stre^f^lcmg ^TCoadlng Requireme^nts Regufation of oi^street pa»^king and loading spaces in this Chapter is to alleviate or prevent congestion of Ae pubtH^ght-of-way and so to promote the safety and general welfare of the public by establishiitg minimuihisrequirements for off-street parking, loading and unloading from motor vehicles in accordance^^h the utilization of various parcels of lana and structures. All applications for an occupancy cemh^te in all districts shall be accompanied by a site pl^ drawn to scale^ and dimensioned indicatni|4l.e location of off-street parking and loading spaces in compliance with the following requirements: Source: Municipal Code Effective Dale: 9-14-67 A. Application of Parkiil^^les All Districts. In addition to the regulations and requirements set forth elsewhere in this Chaph\^e following regulations and requiretnents regarding off-street parking shall apply to the required ah^pon-required- off-street parking facilities in all use districts: SoThse: Ordinance No. 172 Effectr^KDate: 1-1-75 ORONO CC 382 43-1-84) no City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.2073 A RBSOLOTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.61, SUBDIVISION 3 (A) & (D), ORDINANCE 13, SECOND SERIES FILE #1000 & 1009 WBFRBAS, William Wear (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2160 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Section 34, Township 118, Range 23; Commencing at a point in Northerly line of State Highway No. 12 distance 149.05 feet Easterly as measured along said Northerly line from West line of East *s of Northwest 1/4 thence North 2 degrees, 41 minutes, 23 seconds East distance of 334.52 feet; thence South 87 degrees, 18 minutes, 37 seconds East distance 200 feet; thence South 2 degrees, 41 minutes, 23 seconds West to Northerly line of said highway; thence Westerly along said Northerly line to beginning (F.I.D.; 34-118-23 21 0002), (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.61, Subdivision 3 (A) & (D) and Ordinance 13, Second Series seeking approval of a staged comprehensive signage plan prior to the completion of the Highway 12 Planning Study requiring modifications in existing signage, allowing the installation of a second, independent pylon and limiting building signage at 288 8. . (12 tenants each allowed a 2'xl2' location sign), this signage plan requires the following variances to the B-1 Commercial Zoning District standards; Ordinance 10.61, Subdivision 3 (A) - Allowed Area For Signage Allowed = 200 s.f. Proposed = 573 s.f. Total Signage Area Proposed Variance = 373 s.f. or 187 % Ordinance 10.61, Subdivision 3 (D) Allowed = 22 feet Proposed = 26 feet Variance = 4 feet or 18% - Allowed Height For Signage Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Page 1 of 5 'CITY: '•.( OFWNO i; •;. •’ 71: ;• • ■' ■^*’ y'; City of ORO]NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2073________ FINDINGS 1. These applications have been reviewed as Zoning Files #1000 & 1009. 2. The property is located in the B-1 Commercial Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed application #1000 on December 16, 1985 and application #1009 on February 18, 1986, and recommended approval of the multiple variances sought by the applicant based upon the following findings; A) The location, h<?ight and size of the directory sign will not impair sighting at the accesses to the shopping center and poses no hazard to the safety of the general public. B) The applicable B-1 zoning standards are not compatible with existing shopping center use and since 1980 B-3 shopping standards were found more appropriate when considering signage needs of the property. C) The specific design of the structure with elongated sides and minimal building area facing the street is unique to this property requiring special signage. D) The highway is curved along the street frontage of the property and the two curb cuts at the extreme edges of the property create special signage needs. E) The majority of tenants have direct accesses from building and not via an interior mall requiring special signage needs. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 »^'l i ' 4.1 City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2073_________ CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.61, Subdivision 3 (A) & (D) and Ordinance 13, Second Series seeking area and height variances and a variance to the temporary limited development ordinance subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Council hereby approves a staged comprehensive signage plan for the property; A) Total Signage Area: Building Signage (12 x 24 s.f.) Pylon Plaques (12 x 18.75 s.f.) Logo Area (5' x 7.5') Time/Temperature Area (3' x 7.5*) TOTAL SIGNAGE AREA «= 288 s.f. ^ 225 s.f. = 37.5 s.f. = 22.5 s.f. = 573 s.f. B) The property is limited to two 26 feet high pylons described as the west "Logo" pylon and the east "Time/Temperature" pylon, the areas of each pylon are designated as follows: X 6) 1. West Logo Pylon 6 Plaques (2.5* x 7.5* = 18.75 s.f. 1 Logo Sign (5' x 7.5 *) TOTAL SIGNAGE AREA 112.5 s.f. 37,5 s.f. 150 S.f. 2. East Time/Temperature Pylon 6 Plaques (2.5* x 7.5* = 18.75 s.f. x 6) *= 1 Time/Temperature (3' x 7.5') TOTAL SIGNAGE AREA 112.5 s.f. 22.5 s.f. 135 s.f. 2. The existing west "Logo" pylon must be altered to meet approved 26 foot height by May 10, 1987. The east and west pylon must be identical and constructed of similar material. Building permits are required for the installation of the east pylon and proposed modifications of west pylon. Each tenant shall be allowed one plaque area space but in no case shall any one tenant be allowed to exceed 37.5 s.f. of single signage or the combined area of two approved plaque signs on each pylon. 3. Building signage shall be l.».'nited to current tenant's name or logo. Building signage must he brought into conformance by May 31, 1989. Page 3 of 5 City of ORONO GITY ^ONO • ^ •% ;*. \ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2073_ _ _ _ _ 4. All additional signs in front island or landscape area are to be removed. The use of temporary portable signs is discouraged until the final code and comprehensive plan amendments have been completed. The use of temporary signs is limited to 3 to 5 day periods and requires a permit from the City. 5. The City Council places the owner on notice that he (she) is solely responsible for the maintenance and implementation of this staged signage plan and that violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code# shall automaticaxly terminate any authority granted herein# and shall be punis lable as a misdemeanor. 6. Authorities granted by these variances run with the property not with the applicant# but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval# or these variances will expire on that date (November 10# 1987). 7. The undersigned applicant has read# understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself# his heirs# successors and assigns# hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of November# 1986. / ATTEST: othy fi'.j Halliri# City Clerk Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 5 ;ps City of ORONO STM RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2073________ NESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) On this__ _ day of aJ c 0-^j^ » 1986 before” me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared LOiIhciiyi) UJ^a r~ K^(lH)€ X _ _ _ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. THBM8A L. NAAB NOTARY MBUO - MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 1986, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _________________________ known to me to be the person(s ) described in and who executed the foregoinginstrum^t. and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 5 of 5 8 ’ 20 s« ft • V. •/■> -iiiai taa'iSkliillllMy r. * ;i • '/• ' 'WESTERN I :.H: ■:/: j QNVENIEN a |nl|p|e4gfe^f -fl^ I P'l'il :I;';I !^I In ft'aHnH:-;'.!.*:'-.--; ... '■•, • ', v-,. ■•■, Tilfll i| • ‘I:^9M . tL'. v' r-‘: ?jPremiMm 1 OQ 9 lyntolpf . ivNli1 ■ Z 31 <if •f ; i|l ‘.'•V V,’ ►.* • I ;•! • • « 2 LINES 6 INCH CNANCEABLE LEHERS« • • • w y.' IfY 1^. Si— •' — ”J it' • r-6" Osqft 3 ’-6” 21 SB ft r-8 ” 9 SI ft < O *% • • ot -I a* »-• Ot H- CTi r^.a» cd s H X r-6"59 sq ft total Application Date: 10/15/99 Completion Date: 10/15/99 60 Day Deadline: 12/14/99 COUMCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 1999 CITY Oh OhUrtU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 11/18/99 ITEM NO.: *7 Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Sectioc}; Zoning Item Description: #2542 Bruce Hedblom and Carol Cline-Hedblom 2601 Casco Point Road Variance Zoning District: LR-1C One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 Acre) Lot Area:18,570 s.f. (.43 acres) Application: The applicants have proposed to remove an existing second story deck (10.6' x 32.4’) and replacing it with a three season porch (10.6' x 23.4') and a wood deck (10.6' x 9'). The applicant is not increasing ‘he size of the space, but changing its use. The space will consist primarily of the three season porch and a small portion on the end will remain deck. The hardcover amount in the 75'*25U' setback area is not increasing, it will remain at 42.57%. The applicants seek approval of a hardcover variance in the 75’-250’ setback area and average lakeshore setback. The requested variances are for: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover Regulations: To allows 6,310 s.f. (42.57 %) of hardcover in the 75'-250’ setback area where 6,310 s.f. (42.57%) exists, and 4,642.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: To allow a three season porch and deck to encroach 21' into the average lakeshore setback. PLANNING COMMISSION: T he Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 1 vote to: Approve the application as presented. The Planning Commission had the following concern: 1. The screen porch increases the amount of massing along the lakeshore. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. w-TJfy..».It.-jytOJI A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (B) & 2; AND SECTION 10.56, SI BDIVISIONS 16 (C) (6) & (L) (2) FILE #2542 WHEREAS, Bruce J. Hedblom and Carol J. Cline-Hedblom (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 2601 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A Attached, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the propertv"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and tlie City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 15, 1999, at which times ail persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22. Subdivision 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6) to allow the removal of a deck and to construct a new deck and three season porch that encroaches 21' into the average lakeshore setback and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L^ (2) to allow 6,,^ 10 s.f. (42.57%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback area where 6,310 s.f. (42.57%) exists and 4,642.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. Page 1 of 7 1. 2. 3. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2542. The property is located in the LR-IC Zoning District, where .5 acre or 21,780 s.f. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of .43 acres or 18,570 s.f. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 15, 1999, and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 1. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The lot is unusually shaped and sized for the LR-IC Zoning District. B. The residence was built in 1973 prior to standards being adopted for hardcover and average lakeshore setback. 5. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessar>' to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants: and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of7 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6) to allow the removal of a deck and to construct a new deck and three season porch that encroaches 21' into the average lakeshore setback and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to allow 6,310 s.f. (42.57%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback area where 6,310 s.f. (42.57%) exists and 4,642.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The applicant shall remove plastic from all rockbeds on the property within 90 days of receiving a building permit. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution on Page 7. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 22, 2000). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property'. Page 3 of 7 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of November, 1999. ATTEST; Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foiegoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day ot November, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument w'as executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Paec 4 of 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared__________________________;—;--------------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ^ 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared______ ________________:—-------------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,an acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 7 Exhibit A That part o£ Block 1, and that part at tots 14, 15 nni. Blook 2, and that part o£ abandonad Orono Avanuo, all is "Winahip'a dubdlvlaion of Lot 1, Sprln7 Park, 2nd Division", deacribed as cominenoing at tha Northaaaterly oomer of Lot 141, Spring parki thanca Mortheaatariy along the extension of tha Bastarly line of said Lot 141 a distance of 94.S fast to tha point of beginning; thence Northwascarly, deflecting to the loft 101 degrees 13 tolautas, to the shero of Lake Minnetonka, said line heralnafter referred to as L>in« "A"» thence Northerly along said shore to t>*c dorth line of said Blook Ir thence Sast to the point of intersection of the North line of said Lot 14(wlth a Line drawn, parallel with and 30 feat Northwesterly fron the Northeaatorly extonsicfl of eho Westerly lino of Lota 14, is, 16 and 17, Block 3, "Winship'a Subdivision of Lot 1, Spring Park, 2nd Division"; thenco SoMthweaterly along said parallel line to its Intersection with tha Southeasterly oxtensioo of said Line *A"i ‘thence Morthwosterly alcng the extension of^ said Lina "A“ to the point of beginning, according to tho recorded plat thereof. Page 6 of7 (70 ’ i Z^S’09------ .'1 o •- . 5 > 4 ; r n9*? r>u^ /■•-- ■> ^ I harsby csrtliy that this plan, survey or ropon was r«par«d by m« or ur^der my dlroct supervision and that I am duly Ragistered Land Surveyor under the laws of tho State f MinnasoU.^ ^ ^ j/J ^ V >'yy/^ /AjC^^-a Un. or i.ia tot 141 . dlaiuic. of tt.S f..t to the point of fc^l^mp^aoc. twrthu.se.rly. dofloctlog to tho loft tlSnee t.ko MlnnotonWo. ootd Ueo horotnoftor roforrod « ” ^ ^ Morihorly olonu oot.t fftore to tho north line of oald aiooh I «oace M« tho point of intersection of ch« Worth of pAralUl with «nJ 3a fewt Uorchwuicarly frn _ •winihip'J 3ubdlvl«lofi (ho -I.iotorly lino of Loco U. U. U mJ 1^ ‘ •’J}® * of tot 1. Sprlr.y ro.it. 2nd olvloton*, thence Una to Us intorooculon olth tho southesitorly oetonsloo of *-J"* .itoo-r— Mmrrhwn^eurlv Mlontf th# cKtcnalon ofN SiU Lln« h to thm point O CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 ZONING FILE # 2542 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 1 1 /1 6/99 TO: Bruce Hedblom/Carol Cline-Hedblom 2601 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING 11/15/99 VOTE: 6 FOR 1 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:‘ City Council on November 22, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. 7 TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner November 10,1999 SUBJECT: #2542 Bruce Hedblom and Carol Cline-Hedblom 2601 Casco Point Road Variance — Public Hearing ___ Zoning District: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 Acre) Lot Area:18,570 s.f. (.43 acres) This application requires the following variances: Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L) (2): Lakeshore Hardcover and Land Alteration Regulations. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. To permit 6,310 s.f. (42.57%) of hardcover in the 75’-250' setback area where 6,3 10 s.f (42.57%) exists, juid 4,642.5 s.f (25%) is allowed. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C)(6): No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots. To permit a three season porch and deck to replace an existing deck that encroaches 21' into the average lakeshore setback. Application Summary: The applicants are proposing to remove an existing second story deck (10.6’ X 32.4’) and replace it with a 10.6' x 23.4' three season porch and 10.6’ x 9' wood deck. The applicant is not increasing the size of the space, but changing its use. The space will consist primarily of the three season porch and a small portion (10') on the end will remain deck. The hardcover amount in the 75’-250’ setback area is not increasing, it will remain at 42.57%. The applicant seeks approval of a hardcover variance in the 75’-250’ setback area and average lakeshore setback. »2542 2601 Casco Point Road I 'ariance 11‘10 99 Page I Lot Area :ANALYSIS LR-IC Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (.5 acre)100' Actual 18,750 s.f. (.43 acre)50’ Hardcover Calculations : Distance from shoreline Total Area in Setback Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0'-75'3,750 s.f.0 s.f (0%)237 s.f (6.32%)237 s.f (6.32%) (no changes to this area) 75’-250'14,820 s.f.3,705 s.f (25%)6,310 s.f (42.57%) 6,310 s.f (42.57%) Structural Coverage : Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 18,570 s.f Allowed: 2,785.5 s.f (25%) Existing: 2,533.9 s.f (13.6%) Proposed: 2,533.9 s.f (13.6%) age Statement of Hardship : The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. U2542 Bruce Hedhlom 2601 Casco Point Road Variance 11/10/99 page-2 Issues for Consideration: 1. Residence was constructed in 1972. It was at that time located closer to the lakeshore than neighboring homes. The lot is an unusual shape due to its location on Casco Point Road. 2. There have not been any additions or changes to the residence since it was built in 1972. 3. There are four areas that have either landscape fabric or plastic within them. 4. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation : Staff recommends denial of the variances. Exhibits A Application B Site Plan/Survey C Elevation D Plat Map E Location Map F Average Lakeshore Setback G Hardcover Worksheets H Property Owner's List I Permit Record ^2542 Bruce Hedblom 2601 Casco Point Road Variance ! 1/10/99 Page-i ft Application #ZS12. Date Received /d CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Amount Paid 2 go PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address_____260i casco point road Property Identification Number (P.I.D.),20-117-23-24-0036 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired_______N ovember , 1984__________________(month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: x residential ___other (specify). Zoning District; APPLICANT Name bru C e hedblom s carol cline -hedblom Address: 2601 casco point road _______ City:. Phone Ihome^l 6i2-47i-0242 ______ Phone fwork ^ 612-474-6177 (BRUCElN WAYZATA________Zip: 55391 _;.%. OVT'fER (if different than applicant) Name ________same _________ Phone (home). Phone (work). Address:City;.Zip:.V'*'^4.-' • jj ) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 65,700.oo_______ Describe request in detail: construct three season porch in place of existing deck .^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width V Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lake^ore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: our lot is quite narrow , a nd "pie-shaped '' DUE TO ITS LOCATION ON CASCO POINT WHERE THE POINT CURVES._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information mast be submitted by the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete: 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. H/A Completed Application Form Certified Property 0\mers List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hetmepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (e.xisting and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproductiorL Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views provide one (1) copy 814" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is"^e and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s r^-lLJlL-yUdXt __10/13/99________ OWNER’S SIGNATURE ^ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Plarming Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 2^ning Office of this change prior to the meeting. oc 7"-7 ' / 79 ./^9^ (r/- C--? ^ i SCHOBORQ 1 haroby certify that thie plan, suiWy or j'aport was prepared by me or under my direct supervision end that 1 am a duly Registered Lend Surveyor under the tawe of the State of Minnesota.<7 /) ✓ JOB* UkND SURVEYING Book - Page 4C'9Z.? INC. Data- Oc TT* ^^ Ragiatration No. 14700 dcaie M !"s30 That part ot Block and that part of Lot part of abandonad orono Avanoa# all is "Ki: Park, Snd Piviaioa*# dtaeribad at eomanei* Lot 141* apring parki thanca Northaaatorly lina of laid Loe 141 a dlatanea of 14.8 fa« Northwaaeorly* daflootlag to tha lafa 101 < Lika Minnatoaka, aald lina haralaaftar rtf« Hortharly along aaid fflora to tka iiorth lir tha point of Intaraaction of tha Worth lin' parallax with and 30 faat Northwaaearly fr tha vtaatarly lina of Lota 14* IS* 14 and I' of Lot 1* Spring Park, 2nd Diviaion*i than* lint to its Intaratction with tha SoutJitaa* thenca tiorthwaatarly along tha oatonai^a o. bao inning* according to tha racordad pi at * ft II Arm V • . ‘ Crystal O \ V is:i u arrison ^ Bay^ i Shad^ood Point PEERING • • » • • ^ M • * • • **•• / * . Fagerness Point iuooi • • bivo 2 \.. . - .•• __ ‘ ' ■ HCKSONX V /.... I RD ° E 'irTDUCMaN Spring Park TU wwgl BP ■ MOUC RO 1/ ATTia A n% Ma tcv sfni • c A7/ .—a 3^^.**4iau • • • • »4LAU0«n UMTBurtm - UDU« ID _ c^GOOSE ' "^=^7^ ISLAND SHORE LIKE - CO coii: \ - /e - /1/ ■ Carman ' wS^'«80Co\ / ^ Sa [ctfW 3«/^ • • • > ; ■ • • .• : ? *. a J>. island > . • • • eU HARDCOVER^€^CULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250’ 250-500' TESTING HARDCOVER TN ZONE A. House ____________ X “ 500-1000* Length Width B.' Gan^e ( C Driveway D. Sidewalk t. Pado/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic O. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X I7Z SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 'Z‘3 7 B SV X 100 A + B _________ X 100 PROPOSED TTARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _____________ X 23 7 SI. i.JZ s.Fy; A B % l( \ 7 Length Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Pado/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plasdc G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X SJ. SJF. SJ. • .• , • '4 TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ♦ B X 100 - .s J. •• . i.SJ- SI. '■ t. sj. sj. i SJ. Ml . SJ. • •SI. S.F. ■i SI. SI. SI. A m SJ. B 12 HARDCOVER CAL SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House 4<4.T~ CULAEBON-W( f 75-250 ’ J ORKSHEET 250-500' •ze Leofih ///^Width y X X X B. ' Garage C. Driveway SPujt< D. Sidewalk SOuK K Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic *(>■2^ ^6. r // z<r G. Other^r kj/iCL / X X X X X X X X X 3d? 2 6 ’Z'2^ A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - B 14-BZO * B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE /\/0 Aj£ A. House X. Length Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk £. Pado/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B X 100 . - X 100 - 500-1000* /z4^ %/>l 4P 3z^»r 93 r 4 Zg>0 IZ GZ :z£l JZQ C,r zz Ll/0 SJ. "ST. SJ. S.F. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. / 43ZP__ S.F. % X 100 - SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. SE. % A B V %*• A % i . p - ) •> A B r RUN DATE 10/11/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI9SM01 PAGE 5 BATCH 502 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR rWf ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 55 20-117-25 21 0051 02565 DUNWOODY AVE W L BIELKE I C H BIELKE WARREN L/CMRISTINE H BIELKE 2565 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA HN 55591 58 20-117-25 21 0052 02585 DUNWOODY AVE SYLVIA L BLANCHARD SYLVIA L BLANCHARD 2585 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA HN 55591 58 20-117-25 21 0055 02598 CASCO POINT RD P D t P Z FITZGERALD PATRICK FITZGERALD 2598 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA HN 55591 58 20-117-25 26 0051 02655 CASCO POINT RD HARILYN B THORNE ET AL HARILYN B THORNE 2655 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA HN 55591 58 20-117-25 26 0032 02625 CASCO POINT RD J 8 N STINSON JAHES L 8 NAOHI L STINSON 2625 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA HN 55591 58 20-117-25 26 0055 02617 CASCO POINT RD G L HARQUARDT/J H HAROUARDT GARY L 8 JOAN H HAROUARDT 2617 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA HN 55591 * 58 20-117-25 26 0056 02601 CASCO POINT RD BRUCE J HEDBLOH ET AL BRUCE J HEDBLOH AND CAROL J CLINE-HEDBLOH 2601 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA HN 55591 58 20-117-25 26 0038 02618 CASCO POINT RD JOYCE A TWEDT JOYCE A TWEDT 2618 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA HN 55391 58 20-117-25 26 0059 02668 CASCO POINT RD J W 8 B J ESSEN JEFFREY 8 BARBARA ESSEN 2668 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA HN 55591 38 20-117-25 26 0062 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PAUL J 8 HARY E RASTER PAUL J RASTER 2600 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA HN 555^1 TOTAL BATCH 502 00010 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DAT V 4*- ^'1 9 •- - -- ADDRESS PERMIT RECORD 2SS O?^ 0 I Permit No,Date 9-!^ ■‘rt ^vpe of Permit h Application Date: 10/19/99 Completion Date: 10/19/99 60 Day Deadline: 12/18/99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COIJMCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 1999 Cl IY Oh Onuvu DATE: 11/18/99 ITEM NO Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2545 Lou and Marilyn Fegers 3598 North Shore Drive Variance Zoning District: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 Acre) Lot Area:13,954.4 s.f. (.32 acres) Application: The applicants are proposing to construct a two stall attached garage (24 ’ x 30’) to the west side of their residence. The two stall garage will be three floors. An upstairs and a lower walk out will be for storage, the middle for parking. The property owners have purchased the lot to the west and have legally combined the two properties. The property currently does not have a garage servicing it. The attached garage will increase the hardcover in the 75 ’-250’ setback area to 2,515.9 s.f. (38.9%) where 1,662.4 s.f. (25.7%) exists and 1,613.63 s.f. (25%) is allowed. Part of the current driveway will be turned back into grass when one is constructed for the new garage. Average lakeshore setback is not an issue with this application. The requested variance is for: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover Regulations: To permit 2,515.9 s.f. (38.9%) where 1,662.4 s.f. (25.7%) exists and 1.613.6 s.f. (25%) is allowed to allow a two stall attached garage to be constructed onto the house. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote to: Approve the application as presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (2) FILE ^2545 WHEREAS, Louis Fegers and Marilyn E. Fegers (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 3590 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: All that part of Lots 8 and 9, Block 2, "Baldur Park," Hennepin County, Minnesota lying northwesterly of the northwesterly right-of-way line of County Road 51 (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 15, 1999, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to allow 2,515.9 s.f. (38.9%) of hardcover in the 75-250' setback area where 1,662.4 s.f. (25.7%) exists and 1,613.63 s.f. (25%) is allowed for construction of a two stall attached garage. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, 1. -) FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2545. The property is located in the LR-IC Zoning District, where .5 acres or 21,700 s.f. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of .32 acres or 13,954.5 s.f Page 1 of 6 3.The Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 15, 1999 and recommended approval on a vote of 7 to 0. 4. The Plaiming Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The property does not have a garage on it. B. The lot is small for the LR-IC Zoning District. 5. 6. C. This is the only location on the lot the garage can be placed. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 6 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to allow 2,515.9 s.f. (38.9%) of hardcover in the 75-250' setback area where 1,662.4 s.f. (25.7%) exists and 1,613.63 s.f. (25%) is allowed for construction of a two stall attached garage. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The applicants shall removed the storage shed on the property within 90 days of receiving the building permit or prior to final inspection, whichever is earlier. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Plaiming Commission and City Council review. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will e.xpire on that date (November 22, 2000). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 6 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of November 22, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of November, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City, Notary Public Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 6 •fit/I Exhibit A mSAj /fidAj i /^i/?f77c L L\ m / / ^ vr\ >■ / 3^ / / trr^fopo^KO ■z<^>»rt>^K Crf^^yjSA. \ /lLL T}^ft~ F/i/^r 0 F loTi 3 AuO ELocic Zs ’5AU)Ut F>eJ(''. Fe^Fefiiio CoaFjTV mit^rje.foT/^ Iv'hyj^ AjoETHioerre£Ly <7 /=• 7 H£- NOZrH UfB^TStQL •/ C. i^Hr-cf,“ (47 A» V Z//UP CAj^ COaf^Ty ^..,7 /yJO. T/ iO\\ . n -A A- (.0 \ \ \ \ \^S5^ \ \ rec'd n-n-^1 SCHOBOBG LAND SURVEYING INC. 1 herecy certify that t^is plan, survey cr report was prepared by me or under my direct sucer/isicn and t.*'.at I am a duly Registered Land Sur/eycr under tfte laws cf the State cf Minnesota. ) j JC = BccK - -2?e ■crtTz-^Sca:e 972<3321 8B87 Oy. ns. 13 SE OMno. MN SB32B 03te: . J ^ ^ Registration No. 147C0 PaoA nf A ' /=J0 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 TO: Lou and Marilyn Fegers 3598 North Shore Drive Wayzata,MN 55391 ZONING FILE # 2545 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 11/16/99 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING 11/15/99 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below: A new survey and hardcover calculations shall be provided before the November 22, 1999 City Council meeting. Deadline for the City Council meeting is Thursday November 18, 1999. If the information is not received by this date, the application will be on the agenda for the December 13,1999 City Council meeting. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. TO:FROM:DATE:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City AdministratorWendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner November 10, 1999SUBJECT: #2545 Lou and Marilyn Fegers 3590 North Shore Drive Variance ~ Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1C One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 Acre) Lot Area:13,954.5 s.f. (.32 acre) This application requires the following variance: Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover Regulations: Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. Tc permit 2,515.9 s.f (38.9%) where 1,662.4 s.f (25.7%) exists and 1,613.6 s.f (25%) is allowed. Application Summary: The applicants are proposing to construct an attached garage (24' x 30') to the west side of their residence. The two stall garage will be three floors. An upstairs and a lower walk out will be for storage, the middle for parking. The property owners have purchased the lot to the west and have legally combined the two properties. The property currently does not have a garage servicing it. The attached garage will increase the hardcover in the 75'-2'0' setback to 2,515.9 s.f (38.9%) where 1,662.4 s.f (25.7%) exists and 1,613.63 s.f (25%) is allowed. Part of the current driveway will be turned into grass when one is constructed for the new garage. Average lakeshore setback is not an issue with this application. U2545 LowMarilyn Fegers 3590 Sorth Shore Drive Variance 11/10/99 Page-1 i ANALYSISLot Area:LR-IC Lot Area Required 21,780 s.f. (.5 acre) Existing 13,954.5 s.f. (.32 acre) ons: rmit Hardcover Calculations : Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0-75'7,500 s.f.0 s.f. (0%)219.9 s.f. (2.93%) 219.9 s.f. (2.93%)-no change 75'-250'6,454.5 s.f.1,613.6 s.f. (25%) 1,662.4 s.f. (25.7%) 2,515.9 s.f. (38.9%) Structural Coverage: Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 13,954.5 s.f.Allowed: 2,093.18 s.f. (15%) Existing: 1,038.1 s.f. (7.4%) Proposed: 1,698.1 s.f. (12.1%) Statement of Hr*shi p: The applicants ihuula be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. #2545 Lou/Marilyn Fegers 3590 North Shore Drive Variance U/12'99 Page-2 Issues for Consideration: 1. The property does not have a garage. 2. The lot to the west has been combined increasing the lot size, but still smaller than required in the LR-IC district. 3. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the hardcover variance to construct a two stall garag'^ dependent upon the applicant getting a new survey and hardcover calculations to match the drawings before the City Council meeting. Exhibits A Application B Site Plan/Survey C Plat Map D Location Map E Hardcover Worksheets F Plan and Pictures G Property Owner's List H Permit Record H2545 Lou/Marilyn Fegers 3590 North Shore Dr he Variance 11/12/99 Page-3 Application # _____ Date Received JO ^ Amount Paid 2 SO ^ CITY OF ORONO - VARLANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250,00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address O ^ Propcrty Identification Number fP.I.D.'l ^8-117-23 2*/ OQ7‘'2^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey, Date Property Acquired..(month/year) I (do) (de got) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X residentid o ther (specify). Zoning District: L I_________________________ APPLICANT Name Phone (horne d \^ ( 5: Phone (work). Address: ^ SQ o (j«g.*VVt- *hVi otz Citv: V£Ja ------Zip.—^^3 ^ | . i OVT'ER (if different than applicant) Name _____________________ Phone (home). Phone (work). Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost ^ fl— .■ Describe request in detail: Vt.<> a S14yS^‘ ^ / - (}tUi V ^ P gjAn t r? c. (attach additional sheets if necessar>0 *"<^0 C VARLANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width Setback:Front Side X Hardcover Rear Cv Lot Covcragecj^ Average Lakeshore • -j Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:---------------------------------------------------- (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information mast be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 3. X 5. 6. X X X. Completed Application Form Certified Property 0\\Tiers List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Heimepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910):^ Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required In addition, provide one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy SV2" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy SYi" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wash notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant e.xpenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date / ^7 -/ 9 ^ Q- (T^ OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature^Date J O^ ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planiung Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commbsion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 6 /^u rHi^r r/iier 0F IoTs^ e /)>jo 9, ELocic Z^ r/4eJ('! hl^NhlePfio Coarjyy /71/<v//v^Noe-rHUJBZTecLy Of= THB- NO£.rh UjBtT^^L'J (4/A^V Z/A/P Coarjry ^fiO NO. T/ SCHOBORG NO SURVEYING \ \^Q5H6 rCC'yj ii-n'1'1 \ wot Qy. M. ta SE 17^3221 OMne. MN SB32S I hereoy certify mat mis plan, survey or report was. prepared by me or under my direct suceryisjcn and mat I am a duly Registered Land Sur/eyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. } ^ > □ate: i ' Registration No. 147C0 TM^S INO CM • in *. X 400 ^keviev MO OU map 61 _ _Oak< sS^ *« Jennings' Bay K' r,.CoifJ - J;;: xj.• ••.-‘;r lATS > V tOUlMtT ^ ^ *••••••••.. Bl HO Une M «« ^ VH17I Ittl ... ... ... Bl«»»****** .....................................V"-* / fToT,,.,,, iMaovicw’ *2y^':-^;vA\\ ft,ai^-j ?‘-y )■>; . . ■'s'’™. ’’;fv *4V* MMtU *^-Z^ iarrison i* SkosibergFdni 9 m \'/^ ■ 3 — ■ y * 'A . 'il-. -* JJ .,«^y~rr ;t liyo3 7 8 ^5<ronl] I ^ Lake W/f®'"' •Xn • ^ •«*iON«S fOttf iU s (fnm^ ^<>1 PRONa4 ‘ 1600 **** ;; yyj:, ««0»\ ’v^. . . ^ . • V. tMTU 'UU«U1» NJD ly^ tUU40«« > / » <irTfiifcjif* 1- ■■^.. ~. ^^NNETONKA v,, . — ♦Kri) \ .‘ ;t :*f 4 • ... ^untinston Pouu #* 'V ■#3£MS> fec'd SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ^5’ ^ EXISTING HARDCOVER TN ZONE A. House ______________ X HARDCOVER^CSLCUI-ATION WORKSHEET V i _____ ____________75-250 ’250-500'500-1000’ Leopto Width X X X B. ‘ Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. -Patla/Peck rUfh:> ^3 X X F. Landsc^e Underlain £f/. By Plastic _____________ X X X G. Other A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE * B _______ X 100 - X 100 « PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Length Width X X X B. C. Garage Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Pado/Deck X X /^7 ■5V* ^ /<r 2522, 2.* 9Z F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ♦ B __X 100 - SJ. SE. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. S.F. % SJ. S.F. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. A B SJ. SJ. SJ. A B HARDCOVER CALClILATIQ£i-3VORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ 75-250’ J 250-500’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. Hoxise _____________ X ___ Leogib / B. ' Garage C. Driveway X X X width 2 ^'.2. /o *T n D. -Sidewalk CTsor Z‘9 E. Pario/Deck ______ T /“T, 3 F.Landsc^e 12, Underlain ____^ By Plastic Dr>g<^ 3 C7oot' 2 2- z X X X X X X X •X X G. Other 5-. 4 /•> A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE Ik&L.il- - B ■Tx 100 •*. B __________X 100 - PROPOSED HARDCO\TR IN ZONE A. House . /Z.S .1, Length I£JL-X X X Width 10 B. Garage C. Driveway ^4 5^ D. Sidewalk X X X X Z6 m)Nui Orcif -2d Pario/Deck/7;>mu.<. £/ifluo^C x 5 ? X 3 , ^ ^^23^^‘ri‘ecl It,F. Landscape Underlain ____^ By Plastic 4- G. Other X X X t-iA TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 2-51 4^^ * B X 100 - 500-1000* fo^,7.'7 1 SR. SR. SR. SR. •SR. S.F. SR. bO SR. 75-SR. 5‘Z. < SR. •i SR. 2 4 SR. 19 SR. .SR.\ /0-9 SR. m 3<’ . /LC2/L S.F. m 4 4^. r S.F. -% % 657-7 SR.m «SR. SR. SR. •yzo SR. 7,00 S.F. SR. 75"SR. *SR. - - 3 2. r SR. _ SR.••SR. a tp^SR. SR. ic-i •«€ • __SR. SR. f 4- ^4-^SR. OA A B A B c?O p o .Lou - Vna.Rilu/7 35’'=? o No^Tv^SFoRe^Dr^. LucLL^t^+cA,, 1(9/N S53^( '(^ V"V ^ p C/6) 5 COOT 1 ^ 9l Ccx ^ R-eo c<a-<je ' Wf' ¥ 7!--.xrr ^ 4-' - -v-V-:- - ^S; -'v: (».'.•► i;^ So oW\j 01#1, 4^5 .■W .Gi^duhci Level r ^.. . •— » — •*“T • •♦------------— ^ • v-t ,-4- I h- 4 !"1 i i • !.A - - - - - A * 1 !. i_____ t 1 » 1 1 1 — —- L t j ; i % i » • 1 1 * 0itwm - *— ♦ - 1 1 ;1 1 1 ; • i ' r ’ j‘' 1 4—j—i- -1 I ^ _ • ■ - - - • . —— ^ ►! — ■» ■ —• , ,4..* - • -- - •• “.r - 4 -k 4 4 .-.I • I - -1 -4- i - - ;—- ► i a I — !---t—i -*t— — • i 4-— -L..■t-r- t —• • • \ I i---------: ... - 4 Do.upjn ^)}t QA ta. wA ^• * •• • ---- ^...; .^pRspasel- AttftR- a.*lX50 • - - • • • e e.men T_:SUc\<&. 35 ’‘?o SVio«ie ”\)<i. Ui. VnH 5*S3.^ I • . . .. •.'i / • ___y .....— ♦ «-> # J$c'' Ejn.1^* wc^“Doot f..I- ------- - . • - - - e - - • — ,/............. --------------------- I i — •• ^ • • —♦ i -f • BLoJi'-a.sAiJSfli_d4?jo.Ra • -* • / ^ ! / - ' ■ • , t----’■> t ■ t ^ i Am t ■ «■ —fc J ^5<XP= ----«IrttoviT •. »S«ie JA!f I-CapT. \D i a#Loujeii . Lc>a\KooX Le.ve.\ E-- t I .f • i --.— .iI•1!-----•------ —^ • »••• ».,... • •~r — •^ - »■ f” I- r » • [ w ^____:^ie!!^jkojjsLSz •* ** V.T ,0.€»>ienX Slojo. S&'^ide.rQ.o-O.R. _ . i------• — — *• .Wooo 4 ----------------4 t—.. -A---------------.# •.4 . 4' X.3CL, Ocjr?ijenT . P looR. • - < - ♦t * * - •■mm • — ’ * .• • • • - ! --4. -■f-- - t -i ^ i - I- • «• • • •• • •• -4 • • m - •—" ^ • 1 1 # •... •.• • • -•r • - * « * 4 1 .;... i„.-.4 —- 4 t • • -. . .. ... 1 4 -.— 4 • -• - # -• ■- —•----- • «• • * •-•» • ••■ -4 » • * 4 •• T. . •. 4 • 1 » • # i(9 •->. ««... 4 i \ •• •-.• • • 1 • M.* ••* 1»• mmmm m- 4 • 1 ■ • 4 I 4 It •ri~!r ■ m • ------ • ~ i- • •— « • • • ^ — . 'PRoposed . a V X50 '■ Cw»«Ut B. .. :_ Looti?)a,Q 1^1 . Fet^efs-Sr 35^o Mo»^TK €»i»oR.e.”0^ . U>> A. U N SS I 4— ; • . - * • •• ii •I i f* ~ ? I - f - t — M Y':K\\nne‘Vc»nKo^y 'C * • £ i-4- :I Ir r-|-.....;"■*- i— -------- i- - r- • I ^^Uid*ccu« CrL?■ I I i —t- -r ,-i- t i > t I ► - --I- ns' ^QleiierVv*'. • • .— ------------A. 4 . . * #- — ---------- i---\ ■ -p ^ ■io P, I -i I i •>•••<....... 1 .i. ... - i Ir"! •. — 1 ” 1 (•!1 - . J [■;■ ^ - . Li... i• •« i 1 1 t '\_1.! • •- - • ( , 1 1 ft f-1-i 1 ; « « • .^...« • - i I S> -S — > M • — ■ P 1 ~ 23 » • # • iP C> ^----- _b.;. .•o.r ' U— i I- it i • * • -•• ♦ — i ^ — . •- • — ♦-•■-1 ----------------------------------------- <' :L I !*. f •• • I —I -:. \s^ tr -L -%---*- « . • - - •- t i. i .. •«I .# I X 4; K 5’ 0 ■ ' 'L_II' i A ) • • 1 . i 11 i: I —I- ! ■ > ,i . j ... _ • • — • 1 “"1 # •- — i I t I » • • • I 1 1— 9 O’ld'Da^vt. '§ KdCs):) Ffdiu ert __________ . . - - -4. I t r ■ M •f •1i« ft .! 1 99 ! » UcuoH -i- - • • ^ • ^ ♦ 4 •• • O tS-O. :^r —-.—j—A.—t*——: —1 “~ —i • --4------- » t T' R. c mLoo V>)CLR|\»-|r73 t>~ ^ o UoR.Th, 'T)r-Ujci.\^'z.cu*Vcv , Vv/ M ss /Oolk>) yJkMi •r-r f . r , “Tair.. M >,.«• • »» \ I Ronrv V \ e vjj i.,.,.»■•- (36»' - • i____ . .<1- -. t -- -i ■•^r ; i A ------} >-'l i I9.e^s .6 4 •t—♦-----»—-‘ J' i; i' • ’ ■< •• 1 •' I. •’ i ^*7 •• ^ ^^ ♦. vr • - * » *^^0£1.K V I ^ oJ •V ',' .V // .y L' 1|PP^^ ■ ’ • .JjT-: . 1- -^Jes\ Siclf2_ V \ e uJ MJN DATE 10/d6/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIA35A01 PAGE 21 HATCH 505 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAh: TAXPAYER. NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 08-117-23 3A 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN COUNTY HENN COUNTY 38 08-117-23 3^ 0002 00038 ADDRESS UNASSI6NED HENNEPIN COUNTY HENN COUNTY 38 08-117-23 34 0011 03605 NORTH SHORE DR LAURENCE A JONES I WIFE LAWRENCE I ARDELL JONES 3605 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0019 03570 NORTH SHORE DR DONALD JEROHE LAHONT DONALD J LAHONT 3570 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0020 03580 NORTH SHORE DR WADE P DAVIS WADE P DAVIS 3580 NORTH SNORE DR WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0022 03590 NORTH SHORE DR L 8 H FEGERS LOU 8 HARILYN E FEGERS 3590 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0023 03508 NORTH SHORE DR L FEGERS 8 H E FEGERS LOUIS FEGERS/NARILYN FEGERS 3508 NORTH SHORE DR MAVZATA HN 55301 38 08-117-23 34 0025 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED REGINALD A SPINDLER R A SPINDLER SPRING FARM 8402 BURROUGHS RD H DEER PARK WA 09008 38 08-117-23 34 0034 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 it 38 08-117-23 34 0055 03550 NORTH SHORE DR T C ANDERSON AID ANDERSON T C 8 I D ANDERSON 3550 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA HN 55391 30 08-117-23 34 0056 03587 NORTH SHORE DR S R 8 J S SUNDBY STEVEN R 8 JANNA S SUNDRY 3587 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0059 01428 BALDUR PARK RD THE HELI ROTH TRUST KENT 8 LORI ROTH 1428 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HN 55391 €Q ( TOTAL BATCH 505 00012 I . 1 *./ i ! (Tv COUMCIL MEETINQ Application Date: Completion Date: 60 Day Deadline: 10/20/99 10/20/99 12/19/99 NOV 2 2 1999 CITY UF OHQ nO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 11/18/99 ITEM NO.7 Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2546 Christine L. Wood 4005 North Shore Drive Variance Renewal Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area:17,244 s.f. (.39 acres) Application: 1 he applicant is requesting to renew variances that were granted on November 12, 1991 to the previous owner, to allow construction of a detached garage and storage addition to the property located at 4005 North Shore Drive. The requested variances are for: 1. To allow construction ot a detached garage and storage addition per the plan on page 7 of the resolution where the garage/storage addition of 834 s.f. is to be located 3' from a street rear lot instead of 10' as required and 10' from the side rear lot line instead of the required 15' for a structure over 750 s.f. 2. To allow 4,817.2 s.f. (57.48%) of hardcover to be located within the 75’-250' lakeshore setback area where 2,095 s.f (25%) is allowed and 4,165.7 s.f (49.7%) exists. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to Approve the application as presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed re.solution i A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (D) AND (E), SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND AN AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE TO SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #2546 WHEREAS, Christine L. Wood (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 4005 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: See Exhibit A (hereinafter “the property ”); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 15, 1999, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) and (E) to permit a detached garage at 834 s.f. to be located 3' from a street lot line instead of 10' as required by Code and 10' from the side or rear lot line instead of the required 15' for a structure in excess of 750 s.f The applicant also seeks a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit a net increase in hardcover within the 75-250' setback area at 4.817.2 s.f or 57.48% where only 2,095 s.f. of 25% is allowed. Applicant also seeks approval for a 6'x32' section of deck installed without the benefit of a building permit resulting in a 192 s.f of hard hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: Page 1 of 7 1. 3. 4. FUNDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2546. The property is located in the LR-IB, Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 1 acre in area. The property consists of 17,244 s.f. or .39 acres. Hardcover within the 0-75' setback area = 576 s.f. or 6.49%. Existing hardcover within the 75-250' setback area = 4,165.7 s.f. or 49.7%. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 15,1999 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed variance based on the following items: A. The triangular shape of the property. B. The unique location of property on a severe “S’* curve. The property does not have a functional garage that can house cars during the extreme cold winter months nor the summer months. Over 50% of the area of this property is located in the 0-75' setback area. The property was developed before the current lakeshore development standards established in 1975. C. D. E. 5.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property aic peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district: that granting the variance would iiot adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 7 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) and (C) and Section 10,22, Subdivision 2 to permit construction of a detached garage/storage structure located 3' from the street lot line and 10' from the side or rear lot line resulting in 4,817.2 s.f or 57.48% hardcover in the 75-250' setback area where only 25% is allowed and approval of an after-the- fact variance for a 6'x32' deck constructed without the benefit of a building permit at 192 s.f. of hardcover in the 75-250' setback area, subject to the follow conditions: 1. 2. j. 4. 5. Final approved hardcover at 4,817.2 s.f. within the 75-250' setback area is approved as shown on page 7 of this resolution. All structures scheduled for removal shall be completed at the time of the footing inspection for the proposed detached garage/storage structure. The applicant shall provide detailed grading and drainage plans with building permit application for new construction. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be e.xercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will e,xpire on that date (November 22, 2000), Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title ot the property. Page 3 of7 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of November, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of November, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notarv Public Page 4 of 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared__________________________^^--------------- known to roe to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing rostrument.and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared___________________________—;--------------- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,an acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 7 Exhibit A Lot 1 except that part thereof bounded by a line beginning at the most Southerly corner of said Lot; thence North on the Easterly line of said Lot, 21 feet; thence southwesterly in a straight line to a point on the Southwesterly line of said Lot distant 20 feet Northwesterly measured along said line from the most Southerly corner of said Lot; thence Southeasterly along said Southwesterly line 20 feet to point of beginning; all of Lot 2; and all that part of Lot 3, lying easterly of a straight line drawn across said lot, which line begins at a point in the northerly line of said lot 3 feet westerly measured along said northerly line from the northeasterly corner of said lot, and runs in a straight line 235.3 feet to a point distant 21.8 feet northwesterly from and at right angles to the easterly line of said lot 3 and thence continues in the same direction to the southerly line of said lot, in Eighwood, Lake Minnetonka, according to the plat thereof on file or of recored in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said Hennepin County, Minnesota. Pace 6 of 7 -3 /f.-£’ -r, Lf I**-** I €^<49# gm0^i. y« 01 \ LSGAL DESC?I?7I0M Situated.In the County •of Hennepin a.-.d State of Minnesota to wlti v°“i ^ that part thereof bounded by a line be^lnnin? at the cast Southerly corner of said •Lot; thence North.cn the Easterly line of said .Lot, 21 feet; thence South'i/esterly in a straight to a paint on the Southwesterly line of said Lot distant 20 feet Northwesterly measured said line free the most Southerly corner •o; Said Lot; thence Southeasterly along said South-westerly, line 20 . feet to point of beglnnino- all of Lot 2; and all that part of .Lot 3? •easterly of a straight line drawn across said lot,.which line begins at a point in the northerly line of said lot 3 feet^westerly measured along ^ said northerly-line-;fron-the northeasterly corner of said lot,-.'.and • runs In a straight line .235.3 feet to a point•distant 21-8 feet northwesterly , froa rand -at right angles to the easterly, line.of said lot 3 and thence continues'-;ln.-fche saae direction to the southerly'-irhe .of said lot. In Kighwood, LaJca Mlnnetonic.-., according to the plat thereof on file or of record' In the office of the Registrar I of Titles In and .for .'said .County I* **“” ** *^ ** • * • ' 1*^* *'*•*. ' c . tA lu Arcs « • iv::.i7;'300 sq.. .ft:=0.397 -acfeV ^ . I (in'.sq. ft.)— —. as---. - , % Coverage r ‘ .0-75 Zone ‘Arear •8254 * a 75-250 . 8230 Hardcover*-Area .•456*',' I *K .4,094..*'. •• • r.."- 230-500 .. • 56.--'; . 7: O'* *; .• *..o ;CEN0TES-7IR0N - FOUND '.CENOTES-IRON.-SET .rrrDENOTES'*DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW CENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION . DENOTES'PROPOSED ELEVATION . f;•..•.- PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ' LOWEST: FLOOR »■<*# GARAGE FLOOR TOP OF FOUNDATION L4KE . MtHNETOHKA': Tof wArt4 7-C.'f/ s7:9.LI C»4«C/ePlAT • iXCt^TigH i ! •'Kl-M A. REAUME REGISTEPEO LANO SURVEYOR . £12-542-9539 4i3 HCPK NS CaC3SffCl3 . 35343 8 PROJECT NO. 9I039C, REVISIONS SHEET t KE3£3Y CERTIFY THXT THIS STEVfV. S.R REPORT WXS PREPARED ,8Y ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVIS t ON* \S0 THAT I A.M A DULY REOtSTE.RED LANO SUavE'fOR UNDER THE LA'-S OF THE STATS Cr .Mr.NNESOTA. Page7of7--^-^~^.^SFf.. \*o. 1952 2 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 ZONING FILE # 2546 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 11/16/99 TO: Christine Wood 4005 North Shore Drive Orono, MN 55364 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance Renewal DATE OF MEETING 11/15/99 VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council on November 22, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available fi’om the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner November ’0,1999 SUBJECT: #2546 Christine Wood 4005 North Shore Drive Variance Renewal -- Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area:17,244 s.f.(.39 acre) Application Summary: On November 12, 1991, owner's of this property were granted variances to construct a detached garage and storage addition of 834 s.f to be located 3' from a street rear lot instead of 10' as required and 10' from the side or rear lot line instead of the required 15' for a structure over 750 s.f Also, a variance to allow hardcover within the 75'-250' setback area at 4,817.2 s.f (57.48%), where 2,095 s.f (25%) is allowed and 4,165.7 s.f (49.7%) e.xists. The present owner would like to renew the variances on this property. Staff recommends renewing the variances. The lot is unusually shaped and does not have a functional garage on the property. A new foundation should be built and the cinder blocks put in by the previous owner be removed. Exhibits: A Application B Site Plan/Surve> C Plat Map D Location Map E Elevations F Property Owner's List G Resolution #1687 (November 21, 1991) H Planning Commission minutes (October 21, 1991) 1 City Council minutes (November 21, 1991) J Permit Record U2546 4005 North Shore Drive : ariance Renewal 11/1 0/99 Page I J Application # Date Received _/0 -20 Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250,00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) :j«rRenewal Variance Fee $150.00 ar l(rS7 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION «-------------------------JEM—____________________________________________________________________________ ' ~ ^ ----- ■ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.I Q7~II7- ZT V</ OOO*^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Pate PropertvAcquired______S&pre<\>.feE^ __________(month/year) I (do)(^don^)also own the adjacent parcels of land. Presentuse bfproperW: )C residential ___potherproperty: Zoning District: ^ - IR other (specify). APPLICANT Name d o«L, bUPo^Q Phone (home] ____ ___ _________________________ Phone (^-ork)(jr>\^ .*5l4 - Address: A qd ^ Citv: .^.e.Of40 rVlN Zip: IST-S^Johl. 0\^'NER (if different than applicant) Name _______^Anucg — Phone (home)_ Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip:. • ^ I DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ^ Estimated Construction Cost $ 13J&CO’^_____ Describe request m detail: ol*^' (PyAic^£~, g36V<>TM.^ T)e.cJC h kifcUL) . A AtTACHg-p ^ • (attach aaditional sheets if necessar>') VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback;Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) "Qgg AA4-cix3>ug-\ \ja-vv<w>^cA ILARDSHEP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: —yjo-o \ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered completer 1. 9 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. djt Completed Application Form Certified Property 0\^Tiers List of owners within 150’, labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin Count)* Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy SVi" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 814" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owncr(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vonr variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by ori^al fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/'her knowledge. .Applicant’s Signature Date / / OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature ^ate ________ ^ / Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY SliSAN BILGfR LEGAL DESCRIPTTnM situaho^ i Of Hennepin and State of Min” County Lot 1 except that oart- i-k to wit: jj^jnning at the most So5ther[y‘’ro?'*®'’ tot 21 feet, thencS siuthtlsllr,*»' =0l0 line to a point on the Southu..*5^^ ® straiqi said Lot distant 20 f«t of along said line from tho '^^*'‘'03 ter I y measurec Of said Lot; thenersi^^K Southerly corner Southwesterly Une 20 feerr^'^^T ®^°ng said oil of tot 2? ,iS .u Ew !° O' Oogionio easterly of a stralnh*.^ ^ °f Lot 3, ivino lot. Which line beglM J^a 0^?"!* ^ line Of said lot 3®feet ^0^!^rmi" said northerly line from Tk measured alona corner of said lof InS r^® northeasterly ^ 235.3 f«t to a pEinE"dilE,"’ » oi'olohE line northwesterly from and f®®t to the easterly Unn r ^ f^9^t angles thence coEtl„"Jo‘ ;%°5 ”1'* 3 and to the southerly .iihr or fa to the plat theteo? o^n; record in the office of thn d*^ O' Titles t„ ana •• • .. .eaa ^ _ , • •• I , . ,S ''••0.397 acri r*on- •• «nV <‘"-0.^ 8864 75-250 8380J * • 250-500 r f 456^ * .4,094 0 ••• I 5.1i 48.9X cy ■ ° denotes ' IRON FOUND 1* ■.denotes IRON SET ‘ Sf^ ' direction of SURFAGF Firtw •w*: denotes existing ELEVATM^^ fall) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION ■. low«i."r •: *4*'OARAGE FLOOR TOP OF FOUNDATION UK£ . MINN€r0NKA'\ 76fWATi4 T-6*f; s?f®?l 200 VaodUH4i Mml ;/♦, Forest %\':' ■MIIOVIEwLUvt' J • ^ . .. • Arm Vf. *«• son : ^ Skogsberg Point *2 . \*jyL/«®®i West ORONO/s X ^rm M e "Bay 3i;|u]«i±3pSPi 3lg miTmiijh ab S BU Point >\ ffl DEERINO [ Crystal gC 03 ISLAND ,.,{^1 Fagerness Point *• oa OTEM) AVt p» iA*lor? >£^1“** 00 S’”' BUO^ U]ll Spring Park .2-<or: ITOIAB,^ cl o ? i* \af Carman ;i?sin ""ITCjs OIOTW n Point Bay^^ kfiSkOROls U6 sej - N e-.r s^’Ac * -- • '6* C‘C. *=«2CM •^'r ----------- ««r< • rcc^i -VO TYPlCAu 12* LAP i^O* E^C^<R£ p^s^rp.*^:? OjTCf.zE FOR LAP 5ir»!Ni> 'iPArs FRONT ELEVATION z^’-^-o* woe SCA l= /4* • |•^• AU PCPTH OPTIONS 4/12 ROOF PITCN 0€ OOUBLE 6ARA66 DOOR 2 4. sR>cr 4/12 ROOF PITCH 2. 4/ iC.- #i • ?r^.r P4# 4 /y O' 4 £^3/i) ■ 2>-9 <J’r'r€ 2*to dC^-AK - ES OAF'Z^'r • o .«t A i ^ — KUN DATE lO/lA/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INfORtlATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST DATCH 501 Ptor ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER HAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR SB 07-117-25 AA 0005 0A005 NORTH SHORE DR J N B R A SODERBERG JEROHE N/ROSE ANN SODERBERG A005 NORTH SHORE OR HOUND NN 5556A 5B 07-117-25 AA 0066 OAOOO NORTH SHORE DR R J B N T NICOSKl ROBIN J B NARY T NICOSKl AOOO NORTH SHORE DR HOUND HN 5556A 5B OB-117-25 55 0075 01560 NORTH ARH DR PATRICIA H LAWLESS PATRICIA LAWLESS 1560 NORTH ARH DR HOUND HN 5556A SB 17-117-25 22 OOOA 05^^5 NORTH SHORE DR H RICHARD ZUCRNAN H RICHARD ZUCKHAN IBIA DUPONT AVE S NPLS NN 55A05 REPORT NO. PIA55401 PAGE 1 5B 07-117-25 AA OOOA OAOOO NORTH SHORE DR P S B E A LUZAICH PETER B ELIZABETH LUZAICH AOOO NORTH SHORE DR HOUND HN 5556A SB 07-117-25 AA 0005 0A017 NORTH SIRNIE DP JOHN F THEOBALD ETAL JOHN F THEOBALD A017 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND HN 5556A 3B OB-117-25 55 0060 05OB0 NORTH SHORE DR LEAH HARIE VICKERHAN LEAH N VICKERHAN 5OB0 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND HN 5556A SB 0B-117-2S 3S 0071 01570 NORTH ARH DR NARY K RICE NARY K RICE 1570 NORTH ARH DR HOUND HN 55S6A Cfi f* n • t 5B OB-117-25 55 007A 01550 NORTH ARN DR MARGARET PELTOLA MARGARET PELTOLA 1550 NORTH ARN DR HOUND NN 55S6A SB 0B-117-2S SS 0075 015A0 NORTH ARH DR EDDIE A LINDGREN EDDIE A LINDGREN 15A0 NORTH ARN DR HOUND HN 55S6A z^• i• J fV/)Vo SB 17-117-25 22 OOAO 01655 CONCORDIA ST HOWARD R ALTON III HOWARD R ALTON III 1655 CONCORDIA ST ORONO HN 55591 TOTAL BATCH 501 00011 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE «EST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE 101‘0-iw, MdlQij) & CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3038_________ A RBSOLUTIOH GRANTING . VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03* SUBDIVISION 9 (D) AND (E), SECTION 10.22* SUBDIVISION 2 AND AN AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE TO SECTION 10.22* SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #1687 WHEREAS* Robert J. Bilger (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 4005 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: See Exhibit A (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zohing Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) and (E) to permit a detached garage at 034 s.f. to be located 3' from a street lot line Instead of 10* as required by Code and 10' from the side or rear lot line instead of the required 15' for a structure in excess of 750 s.f. Applicant also seeks a variance to Sectio^n 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit a net increase in hardcover within the 75-250 setback area at 4817.2 s.f. or 57.48% where only 2*095 s.f. or 25% is allowed. Applicant also seeks approval for a 6*x32* section of installed without the benefit of a building permit resulting in a 19Z s.f. of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. NOW* THEREFORE* BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 1. 2. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1687. The property is located in the LR—IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 1 acre in area. Property consists of 17,244 s.f. or .39 acres. Hardcover within the 0-75 setback area = 576 s.f. or 6.49%. Existing hardcover within the 75-250' setback area = 4,165.7 s.f. or 49.7%. Page 1 of 6 9•#!r f i •J J ••• G i. y A /S^-siR^V' CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3038_________ 3, The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 21, 1991 .and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: a) The triangular shape of the property. b) The unique location of property on a severe "S” curve. c) The property does not have a functional garage that can house cars during the extreme cold winter months nor the summer months. d) Over 50% of the area of this property is located in the 0-75' setback area. e) The property was developed before the current lakeshore development standards established in 1975. % 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district: that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property? would not merely serve ^ convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty? is necessary o preserve a substantial property right of the applicant? and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. •5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. COHCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zonking Code Secti 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) and (E) and Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 t permit the construction of a detached garage/storage structure Page 2 of 6 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3038_________ 3‘ from the street lot line and 10' from the slde/rear lot line resulting in 4,817.2 s.f. or 57.48% hardcover in the 75-250* setback area where only 25% is allowed and approval of an after-the-fact variance for a 6'x32' deck constructed without the benefit of a building permit at 192 s.f. of hardcover in the 75-250' setback area subject to the following conditions: 1. Pinal approved hardcover at 4,817.2 s.f. within the 75-250' setback area is approved as shown on page 6 of this resolution. All structures scheduled for removal shall be completed at the time of the footing inspection for the proposed detached garage/storage structure. 2. The applicant shall provide detailed grading and drainage plans with building permit application for new construction. 3. Author.ities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 12, 1992). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 6 M. o P; y. • • j / i:rv—> CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3038__________ Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of November# 1991. ATI ST j D^othy M rYh allin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor STATE OP MINNESOTA ) ) 88. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged mSiicipal cLporation Ind said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. m.CAROLE A HASEMAN I0TMIV MUO-MMICMTA HENNEPIN COUNTY»c jl/* Notary Public Page 4 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3038__________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) S8. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of hid\J^jr\r>r 199 / before me a Rotary Public within and for said county# personally knora'to meTtobathe desirified^in'^and who executed the foregoing instrument# and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. sa,NOTARY^PUBUC - MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My oamintssion txpIrM S-IM STAffiS^ ■ MimiDOOTAr') COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this )ss. day ofun tnis /T\/T\ — ut»jf v/i. /JOj/■€.yyi 3.99^/^ before me a Notary Public within and for said county # personally appeared sln-f- Q^ri'P^— ------------^ a . i-"known to me to be the persoivls) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument# and acknowledged that he (they) executed the seune as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public L/.VDA S. VE£ NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My commission cxpiros ^12-40 Page 5 of 6 ... .*/ J . , A > z • • C w// Arc* ‘Qf.'.Paccal H 4 i^iLULi \ RESOLUTION #3038 LECM. DESCRIPTIOM situated.In the County •ot Hennepin and State of Minnesota to witi •Lot I except that part thereof bounded by a line beginning at the Dost Southerly corner of said •Lot; thence North on the Easterly line of said .Lot* 21 feet;. thence Southwesterly In a straight line to a point on the Southwesterly line of said Lot distant 20 feet Northwesterly neasured along said line fron the most Southerly corner •of said Lot; thence Southeasterly along said . Southwesterly, line, 20:. feet to point of beginning; all of Lot 2; .and all that part of Lot 3* lying easterly of a straight line drawn across said lot*.which line beglnsvat a point in the northerly line of said lot 3• feet-westerly measured along said northerly line from the northeasterly corner of said lot*-./-and ■ runs in a straight line .235.3 feet to a point, distant 21^8 feet northwesterly froa':'and- at - right angles to the easterly.llne/bf said lot 3 and thence continues'-in.-ihe same direction to the southerly'-Il'nie .of said lot, in Klghwood* Laica HinnetonXa* according to the plat thereof on file or of record .in the off ice; of the Registrar of Titles in and .for .said .County. . * .•* \ r ; , * • • .». * 0 , " *’306 sq . .ft i «0 .397 aefes -.r.v-t. ... ... . .-"I'Vi Hardcbvec/Ca'lculatlone (ini sq. ft.)-* '8one Tone Are^ .................. 8864 '^'Hardieover'Area .•<56 ,‘ • • 7S«2S0 . 8380 * 2S0>500 I ■ 56 - T. .4 094 •. j •e ’? .‘M. %• Coverage 5.1% 48.9% f ox *.o :0EN0TESriR0N . FOUND -.OENOTES-IRON.'SET 'rrrOENOTES'*DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW. : m DENOTES CXISTINO ELEVATION - ' M DENOTES' PROPOSED ELEVATION f;-*;.-. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS LOWEST FLOOR Mts OARAOE 'FLOOR TOP OF FOUNDATION UKE . MlNNET0W<f-4*’; refwATfA T-b-fl sntzi lit s#4#Tl #xccrriow H SCALE: / ".is' r. . 4 t ■ i XIM A. REAUME REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 412-542-9359 413 MOMlNS CNOSSNOaO WMheTONMA. MMMCSOTA . 9SS4S BOOK 8 PAGE 31 PROJECT NO.SHEET 9/0^90 • • * REVISIONS • I HEREBY CERTIFY THXT THIS SCEVFV. pla ;;. or report was prepared .sv me OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION A.VO THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS Of THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. OAT- 7.y-?/ BOO. BO. 195:: RESOLUTION #3038 EXHIBIT "A" s:si.:s~.Sr« .1-3 ..u s...-....rw n.. “ lorthtrlY^lJe from the northeasterly 5°|^|^^°|i®J^|eerAorthwl^?lrly continues in the same direction to plat thereof on file or of ol Titles m end for said Hennepin County# Minnesota. •/ / ♦ f .V *■> f . ^9 • m •• ^ « • • rtlllUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER/ll, 1991 ^M695 THOMAS & ALICE STUCK AND JOHN M. BAUER, 43^^/4363 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - A) y,;3DIVISI0N OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT B) VAft^NCE TO THE MORATORIUM ORDINANCE #96, ZHD SERIES PUBLIC Hfc<\RING 8:20-8:27 P.M. Thomas and Stuck were present for tKis application. It was moved by Kelley, secondecp^y Johnson, to approve the variance to the mOTK^orium Ordinao<^ #96, Second Series for Application #1695 cts. allow a ^Subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for 4345 ahd 4365SJorth Shore Drive, based on the unique characteristics of «vg/iots, no new lots being created, and this rearrangement wasySufe^sted by the Planning Commission in an earlier variance ap^J^caticS^^for the Stucks. Ayes 6, nays w • Gaffron explained th^4f this is a requesES^r subdivision of a lot line rearrangement Jfo increase the size or^t^ie Stuck property and to place the exil^ting garage within their p^si^perty boundaries. Applicants are jrtso requesting a revision in theix prior variance approval to bpi^allowed to construct the portion oP’^^ck that was previously jjienied, now that the property will incre£iV«^. in area. It wasjifoved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to rd^mmend approv^ of Application #1695 for Thomas and Alice Stuck an^v^John M. Bauer, for properties at 4345 and 4365 North Shore Drive, Tor ^Subdivision of a lot line rearrangement, and to further alia t^e deck addition of 180 s.f. additional hardcover. Ayes 6, nays 0^_ _ _ (#6) ROBERT J. BILGER, 4005 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:30-8:39 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Robert Bilger was present for this application. Mabusth explained that the applicant is requesting setback and hardcover variances to construct a detached garage. Staff has suggested moving the garage 5* to the north to allow use of a proposed backout apron. A 15’ setback is required because the garage and workshop are over 750 s.f. and the garage would be 8' from the side lot line if moved 5' to the north. She noted that the workshop is to the north of the garage. Bilger indicated that they intend to drive in and back out the entire length of the driveway and need to .’.aintain the garage at the proposed location. Mabusth stated that the garage was recommended to be moved because of the backout apron shown on the plans. 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP OCTOBER 21. 1991 #1687 - CONT. Bilger stated that would not be constructed. Mabusth noted this would reduce the hardcover percentages. Bilger also noted that he intended to remove the workshop/storage shed. Mabusth stated by removing both of these, hardcover would be reduced by 4-5%. She noted that there is also an issue of an after-the-fact deck addition which connects the front deck to the rear deck. Bilger explained that due to a car accident on his property, his wife was permanently crippled and the addition was needed for her safety. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of Application #1687 for Robert J. Bilger of 4005 North Shore Drive, to allow the construction of a detached garage requiring setback and hardcover variances, and to approve the after-the- fact addition to the existing decks connecting front to rear, the hardship being the shape of the lot, weather in Minnesota during the winter, and the effort on the part of the applicant to reduce hardcover. Ayes 6, nays 0. Vv, (^^7) #1688 JIM BURANEN, X085 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - ✓ a>ppaLS - PUBLIC HEARING 8:42-9:02 P.M. The Af noted. avit of Publication and Certificate of MpHTiing was Jim Buranen and Reineking were present. Mabusth explained that in 1990, the a^licants were granted variance approval to '^i^arge their garf^ge to house two limos. She noted that because of es;onomic jpt^ssures, all four limos are now stored on the propertys.andr questions have been raised regarding the intensificatiop^^s^f the commercial use on the property. Staff has advisa^appt'bcants that a home occupation license would be necessar^;^nd it is db<;btful all stipulations of the code could be met^,^^She has explairibd to Buranen that the limos have been kept; in the front yard anchsQot in enclosures, there is excessive^arking in the front yard oy^jersons picking up the cars, a^ per the license no one other tnJK^residents of the home cary<^ork under the license; the grey areao^ng these are not employees, but rather contract persons. She nb^^ that the limp^ are currently stored outside. The applicants^^^ve requested, as part of the home occupation license, permissior^w^ buij^ a detached garage structure to house the additional limo^ and other vehicles. t MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12« 1991 X £ (#5)r#1687 [ROBERT J. BILGER, 400S*N0RTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3038 Robert Bllger was present for this application. Moorse explained this is an application for variance approval to build a detached garage. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval. It was moved by Butler* seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3038 for Application #1687 for Robert Bllger of 4005 North Shore Drive, requesting approval of a variance for construction of a detached garage. Ayes 5, nays 0. 6) #1689 TERRY SADLER. 13Wl BALDUR PARK ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3039 Mrs. Sad1e>\and Rod Lund were present. Moorse explair^bd this is a request for a vari^rtce to construct a three season po>v^ in place of an existi/ig deck. Planning Commission voted 5-K^o recommend approval. It was moved by Butler, 'Nseconded by Jabfbour, to adopt Resolution #3039 for Application #1689 for Terry Sadler of 1396 Baldur Park Road, for variances to constNjct a Jtnree season porch in place of a deck. Callahan asked if the issue adHtional hardcover removal was brought up. Gaffron noted the Plan^ffng Commission not addressed this issue. Jabbour felt it woi^Hd only be fair to requireN^ removal of the plastic underlyipfg the rock areas on the property. Goetten stated it could*^ done next spring. It was moved^3y Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to conceptually adopt Res^ilution #3039 for Application #1689 for Terry Se^er of 1396 BaldCir Park Road, for variances to construct a three^s^son porch place of a deck, subject to the removal of the plaptic underlying the rock areas on the property in the spring of 19 Staff was directed to revise the resolution to Include c^dition, for final Council action on November 25, 1991. Ayes /S, nays 0. PERMIT RECORD Permit No.Date ^^30-70 y3V7 7-/0- 81 ■qs»-97 VOTJ ^->? -^9 ll-Jil ■ “?/ f>-n-9L o Type of Permit r )OJl iff AjMjAA^f' OJcuLP '~7?G' g,/i o REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION io<uP ADDITION TO AGENDA Date: November 22,1999 Item No.: N/A ^7^ Department Approval:Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaftron Titie: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2438 Michael Sletten & Mary K. Sletten and B. Peter Achey, 4680/4720 Bayside Road - Lot Line Rearrangement - Second Extension to Effective Period of Preliminary Approval List of Exhibits A - Extension Resolution B - Prior Extension Resolution In November 1998 Council approved Resolution No. 4205, approving a lot line rearrangement for the Slettens and B. Peter Achey to provide a site for septic system replacement for Achey. In May 1999 the applicants requested and Council approved a 6-month extension of the effective date of final plat approval (to November 23, 1999), because the applicants had been unable to obtain the necessary consents for filing from mortgagees in New Jersey who had been unresponsive. This morning I was advised by the City Attorney that while the consents had finally been received, additional documentation including a Certificate of Real Estate Value had not been provided by the applicant, and therefore filing cannot occur before the November 23 deadline. The City Attorney has requested that the effective period of subdivision approval be extended 1 additional month to December 23, 1999. Staff concurs. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED 4- Adopt the attached resolution extending the effective period of subdivision approval for Michael Sletten & Mary Kay Sletten aka Mary K. Snetsinger to December 23,1999. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SECOND EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT AT 4680/4720 BAYSIDE ROAD -FILE NO. 2438 WHEREAS, on November 23,1998 the City Council of the City of Orono adopted Resolution No. 4205 granting approval for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement proposed by applicants Michael Sletten and Mary Kay Sletten aka Mary Kay Snetsinger (herein^er "the subdividers") involving the properties located at 4680 and 4720 Bayside Road; and WHEREAS, the effective period of subdivision approval was set to expire on May 23rd, 1999; and WHEREAS, the applicants' attorney advised the Council that they were unable to complete the conditions of subdivision approval within the 6-month effective period of subdivision approval because of a lack of response from certain mortgagees of the property located in New Jersey who must consent to the subdivision, and that a 6-month extension was requested; and WHEREAS, on May 24,1999 the City Council granted the requested extension to November 23, 1999; and WHEREAS, on November 22,1999 the City Attorney requested an additional one month extension of the effective period of subdivision approval due to the lack of additional documents required for filing, which documents are expected to be delivered to the City within one week. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono that the efTective period of subdivision approval for the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement by Michael Sletten and Mar>’ Kay Sletten aka Mary K. Snetsinger of property located at 4680 and 4720 Bayside Road as originally approved per the conditions of Resolution No. 4205, adopted on November 23, 1998 is hereby extended to December 23, 1999. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 22nd day of November, 1999. Page 1 of 2 ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of November, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 2 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 42 9 A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT AT 4680/4720 BAYSIDE ROAD -FILE NO. 2438 WHEREAS, on November 23, 199S ihe City Council of the City of Orono adopted Resolution No. 4205 granting approval for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement proposed by applicants Michael Sletten and Mary Kay Sletten aka Mary Kay Snet'inger (hereinafter "the subdividers") involving the properties located at 4680 and 4720 Bayside Road; and WHEREAS, the effective period of subdivision approval was set to expire on May 23rd, 1999; and WHEREAS, the applicants' attorney has advised the Council that they are unable to complete the conditions of subdivision approval within the 6-month effect!'/? period of *=ubdivi.sion approval because of a lack of response from certain mortgagees of the property located in New Jersey who must consent to the subdivision, and that a 6-month e.xtension is requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono that the effective period of subdivision approval for the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement by Michael Sletten and Mary Kay Sletten aka Mary K, Snetsinger of property located at 4680 and 4720 Bayside Road as originally approved per the conditions of Resolution No. 4205, adopted on November 23,1998 is hereby extended to November 23,1999. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 24th day of May, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vec, City Clerk Page I of 2 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 42 9 3. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of May, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 1999 ClI Y ur UhUliU DATE: November 22, 1999 ITEM NO,ic Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: 7 Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Request for Sanitary Sewer 800 South Brown Road Introduction We have received a request from the property owner at 800 South Brown Road for connection to sanitary sewer. This property is located on the east side of North Brown Road, 400' south of the South Brown Road/Weber Hills Road intersection and is adjacent to the Weber Hills Sewer Project. As part of the Weber Hills sewer project, a pressure sewer line will be installed in Weber Hills Road ending 150 ’ west of South Brown Road. Connection of 800 South Brown Road to sewer will require extension of the Weber Hills sewer line east along Weber Hills Road and south along South Brown Road to reach this property. This property is an existing developed lot with a noncompliant septic system. The system needs to be replaced by December 31, 2002. The possibilities for septic sites are extremely limited on this property. Chris Pence, Septic Inspector, has inspected the site and there did not appear to be any suitable sites available. Recommendations We are recommending sewering this property using one of the 50 sewer units available from the 1996 MUSA expansions comprehensive plan amendment. This property qualifies for sewer because it is an existing residential developed lot adjacent to a sewer project, has an existing nonconforming septic system, and no suitable areas are available for a replacement septic system. Connection of this property will require the extension of approximately 550' of 2" forcemain from the end of the Weber Hills project. A residential grinder pump station will also be required. The estimated costs for the sewer extension, to the property line, are $23,300. On past projects a $5,000 credit for the purchase of a residential grinder station was added to the assessment if the property owners wanted to be assessed for the grinder station costs. The property owners would then be provided with a check for $5,000 for the purchase and installation of their own grinder pump. The total estimated assessment including the grinder pump allowance would be $28,300. This could be assessed over a 15 year period at an estimated interest rate of 6.5%. The annual debt service costs included on the property taxes would be approximately $3,i III Cost to Property Owner This property was not included in the original Weber Hills project. On other projects when additional properties were connected to the sewer project, a connection fee equal to the project assessment was charged. However, for these properties the sewer line was located in front of the house and the construction costs for the actual hookups were considerably less than the costs for this property. If an estimated $16,500 connection fee was charged, in addition to the sewer extension costs of $28,300, the total cost for sewer would be about $45,000. This does not appear to be a feasible or reasonable cost. Our reconunendation is that a connection fee to the Weber Hills Sewer project not be charged and the property owner be assessed for the $28,300 of costs for the extension of sewer from the end of the Weber Hills sewer project to the property line. The most cost-effective method would be for the completion of this work with the Weber Hills sewer project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve use of one sewer unit for connection of 800 South Brown Road to sanitary sewer, with the property owner assessed for 100% of the costs of the sewer extension from the end of the Weber Hills Sewer project. PartXVm IoIAL U)T Atlff ■ftaocw sf t\«l,£)MSF PB.V /MtfA \ “» so' 934. <5:^<4.n 000 iWfT ono \LAM 'V//X\ ll 7s€1 ' ! 1? October 12, 1999 - * • ^« •* * City of Orono Attn: Greg Gappa Crystal Bay, NiN 55356 Re: Property located at 800 South Brown Road in Orono, MN Septic system replacement Dear Mr. Gappa, I am the owner of the propert>- located at 800 South Brown Road in Orono. As you may be aware, my home is in need of a new septic system. The lot on which the house is situated cannot, however, easily accommodate the type and size of private system that city codes require. Therefore, I would like my property at 800 South Brown Road to be considered for inclusion in the plan to convert the Webber Hills development over to city sewer. You have my permission to proceed in whatever way is necessary to accomplish that. I am currently staying with my daughter in Fairfax, Virginia. My son (Lisle Vickerman) and his partner (Sheila Miller) are living in my house at 800 South Brown Road, however, and they have been authorized by me to act on my behalf in all matters pertaining to this city sewer issue. Thank you very much for whatever help you can provide! Sincerely, Ruth Vickerman cc: Lisle Vickerman and Sheila Miller REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COIINCIL meeting NOV 2 2 W99 out ur OrtUNU DATE: November 22,1999 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: V'} Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Request for Payment #1 Navarre Well #1 Maintenance and Pump Repairs We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and reconunend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Payment ^1, Navarre Well it\ Maintenance and Pump Repairs Project to Al^rg Water Services Inc. in the amount of $7,083.20 i( I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & ^ I Associates Engineers 4 Architect! Owner City of Orono, PO Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Date: November 11,1999 For Period: Start to November 10,1999 Request No: Contractor Alberg Water Services. 16200 Hwy 10 NW, Elk River, MN 55330-7825 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT Well No. 1 Maintenance and Pump Repairs BRA File No. 139-99-108 SUMMARY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Original Contract Amount Change Order • Addition Change Order • Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned Less Retainage 5% Subtotal Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $ $ $ 5. 5. S. $ $ $ s $ Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Approved by Owner CITY OF ORONO Specified Contract Completion Date: November 19.1999 Date: rtqutst 1 1 29,765.00 29.765.00 7.456.00 7,456.00 372.80 7,083.20 0.00 7.083.20 Contract Unit Quantity Amount No. item Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date 1 Mobilization: pump removal and reinstallation LS 1 $3,500.000.704 $2,464.00 2 Televise well EA 2 $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 3 Wire brush casing with well drilling rig LS 1 $1,780.00 $0.00 4 P & I jetting and air lifting equipment LS 1 $3,280.00 0.73 $2,392.00 5 Water jetting / air lifting HR 40 $135.00 $0.00 6 Superchlorinate well LS 1 $675.00 $0.00 7 Rebuild packing box LS 1 $100.00 $0.00 8 F & I ss. Headshaft LS 1 $200.00 $0.00 9 F & I complete set of bowl bearings LS 1 $165.00 $0.00 10 F & I new ss bowl shaft LS 1 $320.00 $0.00 Machine bowl & impeller & Install bronze wear 11 ring, per stage EA 4 $150.00 $0.00 12 Trim impeller to reduce capacity EA 4 $25.00 $0.00 13 8 ” X10* sch. 40 tail pipe LS 1 $160.00 $0.00 14 270' X 1/2“ id PVC dip line tube EA 2 $100.00 $0.00 15 8" X 10' sch. 40 column pipe EA 15 $230.00 $0.00 16 8" X 5' sch. 40 column pipe EA 1 $170.00 $0.00 17 Column coupling EA 16 $30.00 $0.00 18 1 1/2" X 10'ss line shaft EA 15 $175.00 $0.00 19 1 1/2" X 5'ss line shaft EA 1 $135.00 $0.00 20 Ss shaft coupling EA 2 $55.00 $0.00 21 rubber bearing EA 27 $15.00 $0.00 22 Bronze bearing retainer EA 27 $30.00 $0.00 23 Motor inspection, testing, and cleaning LS 1 $1,000.00 $0.00 Complete motor bearing replacement, if 24 necessa^LS 1 $500.00 $0.00 Shop time for sandblasting and inspecting pump 25 components HR 20 $40.00 20 $800.00 Field time for venting the outer casing, if 26 necessary HR 20 $40.00 20 $800.00 rtqutst 1 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF ORONO BRA File No. 139-99-108 CONTRACTOR ALBERG WATER SERVICES CHANGE ORDERS Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY No. From Payment Retainaae Completed 1 Start 11/10/99 7.083.20 372.80 7.456.00 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $7,083.20 Original Contract $29,765.00 Retainage Pay No. 1 372.80 Change Orders Total /Vnount Earned $7,456.00 Revised Contract $29,765.00 rtQuttt 1 r \ W 11/16/99 14:45 & :02/08 N0:461 Poneitreo Resene AnderilkA AiseciMcs MB 4 Afcnitaci* Owner City of Ofono 2750 Kelly Pkwv. PO Box 2tS. Cryetil Bey. MN. SS323-0066 Date November 16. 1899 For Period 10/6/99 to 11/16/89 Reoueet No Contractor Widmer Inc 4250 Creekviaw Circle PO Box 219,, St Bontfaciue. MM SS37S REQUEST FOR PAYMENT ORONO ORCHARD SANITARY SEWER BRA FILE NO 139-98-101 CLIENT PROJECT NO CLIENT CONTRACT NO. SUMMARY 1 Ori0ioal Contract Amount 2 Change Order • Addition 3 Change Order • Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date fl Material on Mend 7 Artiount Earned 8 Leea Retainage S% 0 Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Prev’ousiy 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO $_____50,678.50 S 0.00 $ s $ s $ $ $ s 424 713 50 475,392.00 368 288 30 0.00 368.288 30 18.414 42 349^87388 273.303 60 76 570.28 Recommended fo' Approval by BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Approved by Contractor WIDMER INC Approved by Owner. CITY OF ORONO Specified Ccnt'act Completion Date: Octocer IS. 1969 Date; No 3 r« w 11/16/99 14:45 0 :03/08 N0:461 No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14' 15 16 17 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 Htm Pan 1 • sanitary Sawar 6" PVC sanitary sawar, SDR 35,0'-6' dtap 6" PVC sanitary sawar. SDR 35,6'*10 ‘ dtap 8" PVC sanitary aawar. SDR 35.10'-12 ‘ daap 8'' PVC sanitary sawar. SDR 35.12'*14‘ dssp 6 ‘' PVC sanitary sawar, SDR 35.14'*16 ’ daap a- DiP. 8‘-10' daap in placa 8" DIP, 10 '12' daap in place 4' diameter sanitary MM. 8' deep, inci R-1042-S estg MH depth greater than 8‘ deep Outside drop Oiractional bora 6 ” HOPE SDR 11 Oirechonal bora 4" HOPE SDR 11 sarvica pipe 8" X 4 " PVC or HOPE eompabbla san/iea wye branch 4* PVC service pipe in place, SDR 26 4" PVC. SDR 26 riser pipe Improved pipe foundation in 6" incremant depth Mechanical trench compaction Insulation Closed circuit TV inspection Submersible pump lih station Connect to existing force main ee per MCES detail Total Part 1 • Sanitary Sewer Part 2 • Restoration Remove bituminous pavement Common excavation (EV) Aggregate base, Class 5,100% crushed Type 31 bituminoua bate eourea Type 41A bituminous wearing course Geotextiie Filter Bituminous matsrial for tack cost Bituminous street patching Clear and Grub Bituminous driveway rastoration Concrete driveway restoration Sodding, inci 4" topsoil Seed with topeoil, mulch and fertilizer Erosion control fence Purnivh and plant avargraan traa (blua apruca) 6 ‘ high Furmsn and plant shade tree (Sugar Maple) 4 ” diameter Remove and transplant bushes Remove and transplant tree • Deiiduous Remove and traneplent tree • Coniferout Total Part 2 - Raatoration Change Order Number 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Change Order No. 1 8” PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35. 0 ’»8’ deep 8' PVC sanitary sawar, SDR 35. 8‘*10* deep $■ PVC sanitary sawar. SOR ''5. 10 ‘-12‘ daap 8" PVC senite7 sewer. SDR J5, 12'*14' deep 4 ’ diameter sanitary MH. 8' deep, inci R*1642-B eatg MH depth greater than 6 ‘ deep Contract Unit Quantity Amount Unit Quantity Priea to Date to Date LF 480 36 522 $18.792 00 LF 150 36 150 $5,400.00 LF 160 36 160 $5,760 CO LF 30 36 25 $9CC 00 LF 310 36 297 $10,692 00 LF 60 45 35 $1,610 00 LF 20 46 $0 00 EA 15 1500 14 $21,000 00 LF 69 100 58.4 $5,840,00 LF 11.9 150 11.9 $1,785.00 LF 2550 47 2489 $116.983 00 LF 560 28 635 $17.78000 EA 23 75 22 $1,850.00 LF 450 8 250 $2,000.00 LF 100 6 $0.00 LF 1200 2 SO 00 LF 1710 025 1439 $359,75 SY 100 10 $0.00 LF 3760 0.5 1667 $83350 LS 1 72000 0.95 $68,400 00 LS 1 10000 0.95 $9 500.00 $289,235 25 SY 4000 075 1500 $1,125.00 CY 550 7.5 400 $3,000.00 TN 1100 10 SOO $5,000.00 TN 170 30 141.1 $4,233.00 TN 130 31 112 1 $3,475 10 SY 1450 1 1450 $1,450.00 GAL 100 0,01 25 $0 2f SY 2400 9.5 494 $4,693 Of- LS 1 5000 1 $5,000 OC SY 500 10.5 244 $2.56200 SF 100 8 $0 00 SY 13000 3 sooc AC 0.2 7500 $0 00 LF 2000 2 40 $80 00 EA 5 450 7 $3,150 00 EA 5 500 4 $2,000 00 EA 10 SO $0 00 EA 25 250 2 $500 00 EA 5 250 1 $250 00 $36,518 35 LF LF LF LF EA LF 230 120 135 15 36 36 36 36 15C 186 145 4 6 150C 100 4 42 $5.400 00 $6 696 00 $5,22000 SO 00 $8 000 00 $420 00 Atq.ttr ffO 3 W 11/16/99 14:45 S :04/08 NO No. Contraet UnR Quantity Amount Ittm Unit Quantity Prioa to Data to Data 7 3~ 4» pyQ Qf hope compatible aervtce wye branch EA 3 75 $0.00 8 4** PVC aervtce pipe in place, SOR 26 LF 60 8 $0 00 6 Improved pipe foundaben in 6 ” increment depth LF 200 2 $0 00 10 Mechanicel trench compaction LF 500 0.25 481 $12025 11 Closed circuit TV inspection LF 500 0.5 456 $228.00 12 Connect to existing manhole EA 1 1500 1 $1,500.00 13 ' Remova biluminoue pavement SY 650 0.75 700 $525 00 14 Common excavation (EV)CY 400 7.5 300 $2,250.00 15 Aggregate base, Class 5.100*^ crushed TN 650 10 300 $3,000.00 16 Type 31 bituminoue bee# course TN 120 30 142.7 $4,261.00 17 Type 41A bituminous wearing course TN 60 31 168.2 $6,144.20 16 Geotexliie Filter SY 1050 1 700 $700 00 16 Bituminous matanal for tack coat GAL 100 0.01 0 25 $0 25 20 Bituminous driveway restoration SY 60 10.5 $0 00 21 Sodding, inci 4 ” topsoil SY 1300 3 $0.00 22 Erosion control fence LF 300 2 $0.00 Total Changt Ordar No. 1 $42,484 70 Total Part 1 • Sanitary Sewer Total Part 2 • Reitoratlon Total Change Ordar No. 1 $269.28525 $36,518.35 $42,484.70 Total Work Completed To Date $368,288.30 i. i.i 1*1 .1 I I ; Rtqvifft f4o 3 lit w 11/16/99 14:45 0 :05/08 N0:461 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF ORONO CLIENT PROJECT NO BRA PILE NO 139-98-101 CONTRACTOR WIDMER INC CHANGE ORDERS No.Oat*Oaaorlption Amount 1 6/17/99 Provide eewer service to the Hamm property $50,678 50 i1 Total Chans* Ordors $50,678.50 PAYMENT SUMMARY No.From To Payment Retalnatjie Complatad 1 07/01/99 08/04/99 217.147.91 11.426.84 228.57675 2 08/05/99 10/05/99 56.155 69 14.384 40 287.688.00 3 10/06/99 11/16/99 76.57028 18.414 42 366 286 30 Malarial on Hand Total Payment to Date $349,673.88 Original Contract $424,713 50 Retainage Pay No. 3 10.414.42 Change Orders $50.678 50 Total Amount Earned $368 288 30 Revised Contract $475,392 00 !ii .1 I i RtqgtMNo .1 t• • w nil REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 W99 Cll Y OHONO DATE: November 22,1999 ITEM NO./5 €11/16/99 14:45 S :06/08 N0:461 l/]lBeiNureo ptfRoftnt nAndwM(4 |\j| AOOCtatM ingnttM 4 AntNirrn Owtw: City o> Prone 2750 Kelly Pkwv. PO Box 337. Crystal Bav. MN. SS323»00( Dtf: Novtmbtr 16.1999 Fy Period: 10/25/99 to 11/16/99 ______________________________Htquwt No:_________1_______ Contrueter: BuHftlo BHumlnoue ino 2862 Countv Road 12 N. PQ Bok 337.. Buffalo. MN. 6S313 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT STUBBS BAY ROAD CUL-DE-SAC BRA FILE NO. 139-00-103 CLIENT PROJECT NO. CUENT CONTRACT NO. SUMMARY 1 '2 3 4 5 6 7 B P 10 11 Original Contract Amount Chang# Ordar - Addition Chango Ordor • Daduction Ravlaad Contract Amount Value Complatad to Data Material on Hand Amount Earned Laaa Ratainaga 5% Subtotal Laaa Amount Paid Pravteuaty AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 121.074.75 « S 0.00 0.00 $ $ I $ $ t $ $ 121.074.75 13,215.00 0.00 13,215.00 660.75 12,554.25 0.00 12.564.21 Racommandad for Approval by: ■ONE8TROO, ROSENB, ANDERUK A ASSOCIATES. INC. Approvad by Contractor: BUFFALO BITUMINOUS INC Approved by Owner. CITY OF ORONO Spacilled Contract Completion Date: June 1.2000 Data; AgQUitT MO. 1 • I »*, • • !.i I !; 1 E No. 1 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 as 26 27 86 29 w ntm Bom Bid Mobilization Clearing and gnibblng Pavament marking ramoval • parmanant Ramova pipa eulvart Ramove sign, Type C Sawing bituminous pavamant (full dapth) Salvage bitunfilnoua pavamant Common excavation (P) Topsoil borrow (CV) Aggregate base. Class 6 mod Aggregate sbouldarlng. Class 2 Type 41 wearing oouraa mixture Type 31 base course mixture Bituminous pavamant reclamation Bituminous malarial for tack coat Coarse Ritar Aggregate Mod (CV) Permanent Barrieadas Traffic control 4" solid line white«epoxy sign panels, Type C Bale check silt fence, Type aell supporting Seeding Mulch material Type 1 Disk anchoring Commercial fertilizer analysis 22-5-10 Seed Mixture 60A Colorado Blue Spruce, 6 ft. high, BAB Sugar Maple 2* Cel. BAD Total Base Bid Total Base Bid Total Work Completed To Date 11/16/99 14:45 0 :07/08 N0:461 Cohtraet UnH Quantity Amount Unit Quantity Price leoata te Date LS 1 2000 0.5 $1,000.00 LS 1 1000 1 $1,000.00 LF 1000 1.5 1000 $1,500.00 LF 160 S.S $0.00 EA 12 15 6 $60.00 LF 130 3.6 $0.00 SY 910 2.5 010 $2,275.00 CY 660 8 400 $3,600.00 CY 150 17.5 $0.00 TN • 600 12 $0.00 TN 160 16.75 $0.00 TN 620 25.5 $0.00 TN 1100 26.5 $0.00 BY 8310 1.6 $0.00 GAL 500 1 $0.00 CY 400 27 $0.00 LF 6 36 $0.00 LS 1 2500 0.5 $1,250.00 LF 1300 2.5 1000 $2,500.00 8F 16.25 26 $0.00 EA 8 16.6 $0.00 LF 700 1.7S $0.00 ACRE 4 276 $0.00 TN 6 125 $0.00 ACRE 4 110 $0.00 LB 1800 0.7 $0.00 LBS ISO 3.6 $0.00 EA 10 260 $0.00 EA 10 300 $0.00 813,215.00 $13,215.00 $n.2is.oo i.» •ri I I, t; • 1 I I ’ tI !*• RFP-Wl r €11/16/99 14:45 0 :08/08 N0:461 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF ORONO CLIENT PROJECT NO. BRA PILE NO. 13d-e0-103 CONTRACTOR BUFFALO BITUMINOUS INC CHANGE ORDERS Total Payment to Data $12,554.25 Original Contract $121,074.76 Ratainaaa Pay No 1 650.75 Ghana# Ordara Total Amount Eamad $13,215.00 Raviaad Contract $121,074.75 MfOUCITNO. i I • t i No.Data Oatorlptlon Amount • 1 1! 6. Total Chanoa Ordara a PAYMENT SUMMARY . • 1/ •• 1,1 No.Prom To Paymant Ratalnafla Complatad r Cl____1O/2S/0O 11/16/09 12.554.25 650.75 13.215.00 f Mata rial on Hand ••1 :i ‘1 »• i! » II I, ,1 * 1. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION cr>i inc<L meet \nq NOV 2 2 W99 DATE: ITEM NO.= H Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Approve Easement Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-Sac We have obtained an easement from Stephen and Noreen Krogness, 605 Stubbs Bay Road North, to construct the Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-Sac. Payment for this easement is at $1.00 per square foot of easement area. This is the same amount per square foot that was paid to the other two property owners with easements. The property owner is agreeable to this payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize payment of $380 to Stephen & Noreen Krogness for an easement to construct the Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-Sac. Q- SO' , \00‘ <TCALE PXD 32-//S'25-2/-o<»^ lPtLr^1Ft\L-\V /.Iklg ITfio 6Jpfi^ vtx>71\' ^i4- 32./I8-Z3-2-^-o^'^K$ •^061 C0l-X)\ PZP •, <9-a./3-0002 32- ll& ^ *® (& I^t)' CUL'Dt ^ ca ,L COUNCIL MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION NOV 2 2 t999 DATE: >ft‘vemlfe?W999 ITEM NO: / Department A pproval: Name Lin Vee Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Proposed 2000 Fee Schedule Attachment: A. Proposed 1999 Fee Schedule Ordinance B. Summary Ordinance The proposed 2000 Fee Schedule Ordinance and Summary reflecting the proposed changes are attached. The proposed changes include: Increase in various fees related to zoning applications. Increase in residential park dedication fees. Increase in fees for inspections and clerical service for contract cities. Change in Fingerprint Service to limit of 2 cards with application; $13.00 charge for each additional card. lncrea.se in all sanitary sewer and water connection charges. 3.2% increase in sewer rates and 2.9% increase in water rates. Increase in bulk sale of water to Minnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge Area. Increase in golf rates. COUNCIL ACTION REQUi:STED: Motion to adopt the attached ordinance adopting the City's Fee Schedule for 2000 and Summary Ordinance for publication. SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 193 . SECOND SERIES ORDINANCE NO. 193 . SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2000 FEE SCHEDULE AND REPEALING ORDIN.ANCE NO. 181, SECOND SERIES; NO. 190, SECOND SERIES; AND 192, SECOND SERIES The following is the official summary of Ordinance Number 193 . Second Series approved by the City Council of the City of Orono on November 22, 1999. The following sections have changes, additions and/or deletions: 1999 2000 DESCRIPTION £££EEE ZONING APPLICATIONS Conditional Use Permit Commercial/Industrial Use S300.00 $325.00 PRD Application with Subd'.'hion Subdivision Fee plus $30.00 Subdivision Fee plus $35.00 per dwelling unit per dwelling unit PRD Application without Subdivision S35.CO per dwelling unit $40.00 per dwelling unit (minimum $150.00)(minimum $150.00) PID Applications $150.00 per acre $175.00 per acre (minimum $350.00)(minimum $350.00) Commercial Site Plan Review $250.00 + Consultant Fee $275.00 Consultant Fee Subdivision Sketch Plan (Class I, II. & III)$250.00 $275.00 Preliminary Review $375.00 + $25.00/lot $400.00 + $30.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III)$200.00 + Special Legal'$225.00 + Special Legal/ Engineering Charges Engineering Charges Filing Fees: a) Subdivis'^in only $75.00 $100.00 PUD Rezoning: Residential $350.00 + $40.00 $375.00 + $40.00 per dwelling unit per dwelling unit Commerc ial'lndustrial $150.00 p'^r acre $175.00 per acre ($350,00 minimum)($350.00 minimum) Request to Amend Comprehensive Plan $350.00 $375.00 { DESCRIPTION 1999 £££ 2000 £££ ZONING APPLICATIONS continued Special Improvements Proposed Private Roads $600.00 + $.50/lineal foot $650.00 + $.50/lineal foot Proposed Public Roads $900.00 + $.50/lineal foot $950.00 + $.50/lineal foot Request for City to accept existing private road $900.00 $950.00 Request for City to maintain unimproved public road $200.00 $225.00 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Mam Extension $250.00 + $25.00/stub $275.00 + $25.00/stub Proposed Watermain Extension $250.00 + $25.00/stub $275.00 + $25.00/stub Proposed Storm Sewer System (extending culverts)$200.00 $250.00 On-Site System - Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $50.00/new lot proposed for on-site $60.00/new lot proposed for on-site Surcharge for Staff Expense in Excess of Application Fees Professional Time $40.00/hour $50.00/hour Clerical Time $20.00/hour $30.00/hour Park Dedication Fees I Cash Contribution in Lieu of Land The City has established by resolution a minimum residential park fee of $2,900 per dwelling unit and a maximum of $4,900 per dwelling unit. $2,900 (minimum) $4,900 (maximum) $3,100 (minimum) $5,300 (maximum) ALL SANITARY SEWER & MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES Various charges Various charges CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES Contractual Inspection Service Inspection Charge Clerical Fee (Only charged if clerical use $ 15.00 per inspection $15.00 per hour $20.00 per inspection $20.00 per hour is excessive) LICENSES & MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Police Department Administered Fingerprinting Service S25.00/appl icat ion-Resident only (Citizenship No rhar"c) S2S.00'application*Resident only (Citizenship No Charge) fc! 2 cards-$13.00 each additional MUNICIPAL SEWER RATES by unit: 1st 2nd by flow: S 79.30 per qtr. $71.80 per qtr. $ 2.97/1000 gallon plus $ 7.50 per quarter per connection $81 .85 per quarter $74.10 per quarter $ 3.07/1000 gallon plus S 7.75 per quarter per connection DFSCRIPTION MUNICIPAL WATER RATES Navarre Area Billing & Ready to Serve Chg Water Usage Rate Unconnected Property Chg Highway 12 Area Billing & Ready to Serve Chg Water Usage Rate Chevy Chase Area Billing & Ready to Serve Chg Water Usage Rate 1999 £££ 2000 £££ $ 22.60/qtr $ 1.92/1000 gal $ 22.60/qtr S 8.30/qtr $ 2.66/1000 gal $ 8.30/qtr $ 2.12/1000 gal Bulk sale to Minnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge Area Area # 1 Rate S22.60/qtr billing charge plus SI.92/1000 gallon total flow at border meter PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Golf Course Charges - Eff<*rtive date 2000 Season Monday thru Friday (excluding Holidays) $23.20/qtr $ 1.97/1000 gal $ 23.20/qtr $ 8.50/qtr $ 2.73/1000 gal $ 8.50/qtr $ 2.18/1000 gal $23.20/qtr billing charge plus $1.97/1000 gallon total flow at border meter Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon 1st Nine Holes S 8.00 $ 8.50 2nd Nine Holes $ 5.50 $ 6.00 After 12:00 Noon and Weekend Rates 1st Nine Holes SI 0.00 $ 10.50 2nd Nine Holes S 7.50 S 8.00 2nd Nine Holes (Weekday After 12:00 Noon) $ 5.50 $ 6.00 League Rates Monday thru Friday $ 8.75 S 9.00 Senior Citizen (Over 60 years old) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon - Weekdays $ 6.001st Nine Holes $ 5.50 2nd Nine Holes $ 5.50 $ 6.00 Season Ticket (Senior Citizens Only)$140.00 $150.00 GOLF CART RENTAL .Motorized: $ 10.501st Nine Holes (After 12:00 & Weekends)SI 0.00 2nd Nine Holes S 8.00 $ 8.50 Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon 1st Nine Holes $ 7.00 S 7.50 2nd Nine Holes S 7.00 $ 7.50 1 DESCRIPTION 1999 EEE 2000 £££ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES continued Golf Course Charges STUDENT RATE (AGES 12 - 17) Begin Play Before Noon Monday - Friday, Excluding Holidays 1st Nine Holes S 5.50 2nd Nine Holes S 5.50 S 6.00 $ 6.00 FALL RATES Will begin the third Monday of September Weekend Rates: 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes Riding Cart (Per Nine Holes) $ 8.00 S 5.50 $ 7.00 $ 8.50 S 6.00 $ 7.50 Weekday Rates: 1st Nine $ 6.00 $ 7.00 A printed copy of the 2000 Fee Schedule Ordinance is available for inspection by any person at the oftlce of the City Clerk during regular office hours. This ordinance becomes efTective the week of January 3,2000. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 22nd day of November, 1999, by a vote ayes and____nays. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk ORDINANCE NUMBER 193 . SECOND SERIES SUMMARY APPROVED The Council hereby determines that the text of the summary of this ordinance marked "Official Summary of Ordinance Number 193 . Second Series," and a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The Council further determines that the publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. COUNCIL MBETINQ NOV 2 2 t999iREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF ORONO DATE; November 19,1999 ITEM NO: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse City Administrator's Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Renewal of Contract for Prosecution Services In 1997, the City conducted an RFP process to select a prosecuting attorney. Based on that process, the City selected Ken Potts to provide prosecuting attorney services, and entered into a two-year agreement with him. This agreement expires on December 31,1999. Over the past two years, Ken Potts has provided very good prosecution services at a very reasonable cost. He has indicated he is interested in continuing as prosecuting attorney for the City. In 1999, Mr. Potts provided prosecution services for a flat fee of $27,500.00. Mr. Potts has proposed an increase of $ 100.00 per month, for a total annual cost of $28,700.00 for the year 2000. TTiis is a total increase of $1,200.00 or 4.4%. Staff recommends renewal of the contract with Ken Potts for prosecution services for the year 2000 at a cost of $28,700.00. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the renewal of the contract with Ken Potts for prosecution services for the year 2000 at a cost of $28,700.00, and to authorize the City Administrator to sign the renewal agreement. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 W99 CU V ohono DATE: November 18,1999 ITEM NO: j Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Consolidation Study Grant - Resolution The State Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation has a grant program through which it will match local expenditures related to a consolidation study to a maximum of $10,000. The Long Lake/Orono Consolidation Study Committee is making use of assistance from consultants and other resource people to enable it to accomplish its purpose in an expedited manner. The costs to be incurred for this assistance are estimated at $30,000. The application for the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation grant requires a resolution from the City Council of each city involved in the consolidation study requesting funding for the consolidation study. A resolution is attached for Council consideration. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt a resolution requesting funding from the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation to assist with costs associated with the Long Lake/Orono consolidation study. A RESOLUTION REQUESTING FUNDING FROM THE BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION TO ASSIST WITH COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LONG LAKE/ORONO CONSOLIDATION STUDY WHEREAS, the Cities of Long Lake and Orono created a Consolidation Study Committee to study and report back to the City Councils on the issue of the consolidation of the cities of Long Lake and Orono; and WHEREAS, the Consolidation Committee began discussions on consolidation in April, 1999 and hired a consulting firm to assist with the consolidation study; and WHEREAS, the Cities of Long and Orono are making application for funding from the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation for a matching grant of up to $10,000 to assist with a portion of the costs associated with the consolidation study, as outlined in Minnesota Statutes 465.88, Planning aid for consolidation studies; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono agrees that the Board grant will be matched dollar for dollar by funding from the Cities of Orono and Long Lake. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Orono does hereby request aid from the Board of Government Innovation ana Cooperation to assist with the costs associated with the study of consolidating the Cities of Long Lake and Orono. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 22nd day of November, 1999. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 1 of 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEET'N® NOV 2 2 W99 DATE: ITEM NO: /% Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Adminbtrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Park Commission Appointment Two residents have indicated an interest in filling the unexpired term on the Park Commission. The two candidates are Theodore Edir and Rick Meyer. The Council may al this time appoint one of the candidates to the Park Commission. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to appoint ______________to an unexpired term on the Park Commission that expires on December 31,2002. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 2 2 ;j9p ‘"'’'‘"•o/Jo/vo Date: November 19, 1999 Item No: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: Gary Cheswick Chief of Police Item Description: Full-Time Community Service Officer Resignation Exhibits:None DISCUSSION Effective 12/1/99, Robyn Hoechst (Community Service Officer) has accepted a position with the Minneapolis Police Department within the 9-1-1 Communications Division. During Robyn’s tenure, she has provided Orono and the contract cities with a strong sense of accomplishment and purpose. Robyn's contribution will be missed. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To accept resignation of Robyn Hoechst. COUMCIL MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION NOV 2 2 1999 Ull y Uh OHQwri DATE: November 16,199^ ITEM NO: ^ C Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse City Administntor's Title Cit}’ Administrator Report Item Description: Personnel Action - Kris Knollenberg Background Kris Knollenberg has been employed by the City in an office support position with the Police Department since April of 1994. Her position involves word processing, data entr)', police records, and customer service. In March of 1999, Ms. Knollenberg reported an injury to hwr right (dominant) forearm she believed was caused by her work at her computer work station. i his injury has resulted in substantial work restrictions. An orthopedic specialist has determined that Ms. Knollenberg's condition is permanent, and ordered a functional capacities evaluation based on Ms. Knollenberg's permanent disability. The tunctional capacities evaluation indicated pemianent work restrictions, particularly a restriction to a maximum of 2 hours per day of keyboarding work. Determination Regarding Accommodation of Work Restrictions Based on the activities that need to be accomplished in the Police office, the small size of the Police office staff, and the City’s experience with Ms. Knollenberg working with keyboarding restriciions during a trial period in July; the City is unabD to accommodate her work restrictions. There is not su.Ticient work within her work restrictions to enable her to play a productive role in accomplishing the work of the Police office. Even looking beyond the Police Department to the wider City organization, the City could not providv a position that would accommodate her work restrictions. Staff Recommendation The Police Department has been functioning w ith temporiir>' and part-time staff since March of 1999. Based on the pemianent work restrictions that have been placed on Ms. Knollenberg and the lack of sufficient work within the work restrictions, staff recommends Ms. Knollenberg’s employment with the City be terminated, and that the full-time Police Records position be filled as soon as possible. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the termination of Kris Knollenberg from the I’ulice Records position effective November 22, 1999. a REQl)tST FOR COUNCIL ACTION era iMciL meeting NOV 2 2 1999 oi IT or UhONu DATE: November 19,1999 ITEM NO; Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse City Administrator's Title City Administrator Report Item Description: 2000 General Engineering Rates Attached is a letter from Bonestroo Associates setting out proposed engineering rates for the year 2000. The rates are increasing approximately 3.5%. Staff believes the requested rate increases are reasonable. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; Motion to approve the general engineering rates for the year 2000 as proposed by Bonestroo Associates. mf I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& I Associates Engineers & Architects Soneitroo. Rosene. Andv V ,ind As50C/c»:es. trc is .in Affirrvjm e Action Bqu.il Opportunity BiPployor f*nnciptil5 Otto G Bonestroo. PE • Joseph C Anderlik. PE • \UfVin L Sorv.iM, PE. • ' R Cook PE • Robert G Scrunicht. PE • Jerry A Bourdon, PE • Tv'-Oen W Rosene. PE . Rich.ud E urner PE arej Siis«in M EDfflin C PA . Senior Consuft.^nt$ Assoct€ite Principals Howiird A S.mford. PE • Ke-th A Gordon PE • Robert R Pfefferle. PE • Richard sV Foster. PE • David O Loskota. PE • Robert C Pussck, A I A • M.irk A. Hanson. PE • Michael T Rautmann. PE • Ted K Fie*d, FE. • Kenneth P. Anderson. PE • Mark R Rolfs. PE. • Sidney P Williamson. PE. L S • Robt^: t .\otsmith • Agnes M. Rifig • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE. Offices St Paul. Rochester. Willmar anc St Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl •, ‘ • I I - ♦ «• . • - - * j/ - -Webfife wwwbonesfroo com NO'/ 1 ^ 199'^ November 10, 1999 C'.'. I . City of Orono Attn: Ronald Moorse P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Re: 2000 General Engineering Rates Honorable Mayor and City Council: Serving municipalities is not only our specialty; it is our privilege and pleasure. We appreciate the trust you've shown in us as we’ve helped you plan for, set and reach your engineering and architectural goals. To help you prepare for projects in the new year, we are enclosing our revised hourly rates for general engineering services, which will be effective January 1,2000. We strive to strike a balance between keeping our hourly rates as low as possible while maintaining our commitment to keeping staff and technical capabilities innovative and efficient. If you have any questions concerning any aspect of our rates or services, please feel free to contact me at (651) 636-4600, or directly at (651) 604-4765. Again, we have appreciated our relationship with the City of Orono, and our entire staff looks forward to serving you in 2000. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIA1ES, INC. hiMjL Marvin L. Sorvala MLS: tb Enclosure(s) cc: Glenn Cook 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. MN 55113 • 651*636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 2000 Rate Schedule Classification 1999 %!nc.2000 Senior Principal $94.50 3.1%$97.50 Principal/Project Manager | Senior Scientist | Planner $84.50 3.4%$87.50 Register Engineer/Architect | Namral Resource Specialist | Software Programmer $73.50 3.3%$76.00 Project Engineer/Architect/Scientist | Senior Field Supervisor $64.50 3.7%$67.00 CIS Specialist | Senior Designer $63.50 3.1%$65.50 Graduate Engineer/Architect/Scientist | Field Supervisor $57.50 3.4%$59.50 Senior Draftsperson | Senior lnsp>ector $52.00 3.7%$54.00 Inspector j Draftsperson | Senior Technician $48.50 3.0%$50.00 Technician $34.50 2.8%$35.50 Word Processor $34.00 2.9%$35.00 Total Station Equipment $20.00 0.0%$20.00 GIS Workstation Equipment $20.00 0.0%$20.00 GPS Equipment (per half day)$50.00 0.0%$50.00 Attendance at Regular Council Meeting $50.00/Mtg. ITiese rates are adjusted annually at the first of the year in accordance with the normal review procedures of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates. Inc. Reimbursable Expenses - At Cost Reproduction, Printing, Duplicating, Mileage Out of pocket expenses such as stakes, field supplies, telephone calls, etc. City of Orono 2000 Private Developer's Rate Schedule Classification 2000 Senior Principal Principal/Project Manager | Senior Scientist | Planner Register Engineer/Architect | Natural Resource Specialist | Software Programmer Project Engineer/Architect/Scientist | Senior Field Supervisor GIS Specialist | Senior Designer Graduate Engineer/Architect/Scientist 1 Field Supervisor Senior Draftsperson | Senior Inspector Inspector | Draftsperson | Senior Technician Technician Word Processor Total Station I luipment GIS Workstation Equipment GPS Equipment (per half day) $127.00 $114.00 $99.00 $87.00 $85.00 $77.50 $70.00 $65.00 $46.00 $45.50 $20.00 $20.00 $50.00 These rates are adjusted annually at the first of the year in accordance with the normal review procedures of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates. Inc. Reimbursable Expenses - At Cost Reproduction, Printing, Duplicating, Mileage Out of pocket expenses such as stakes, field supplies, telephone calls, etc. City of Orono REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 1999 DATE: ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Tom KuehrT|^ Title v(f^ Finance Director Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Certification of Delinquent Utilities and General Service Fees Attachments: (A) Resolution providing for the collection of delinquent sewer, water, recycling program fees, septic inspection fees, and general service fees. (B) Assessment roll. Each year the city certifies to the county, all unpaid annual service charges for the septic inspection program, the unpaid recycling program fees, all delinquent sewer ai.d water accounts of $50.00 or more, and the delinquent general services for false alarm fees and developers improvement fees, to be collected with the following year's taxes. In addition to the outstanding amounts delinquent, eight percent (8%) interest is added to all accounts and an administrative fee is added to the septic accounts. At this time the total to be assessed is $ 67.037.44, including administrative fees. This amount will be decreased by any payments received up to the final payment date of November 29, 1999. A copy of the assessment roll is attached for your review. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adoption of resolution providing for the collection of delinquent charges for the 1999 sewer and water utility ser\ ices, the septic inspection program, the recycling program, the false alarms, developers improvement fees, and other general service fees. , seconded by., to adopt ResolutionPROPOSED MOTION: - Moved by,__ Number ______, providing for the collection of delinquent 1999 charges for sewer and water utility services, fees for the annual septic inspection and recycling programs, fees for false alarms, developers improvement fees, and other general service fees. Ayes___, Nays___. TO\r.M$%\ORO ( I HT^l B A RESOLUTION FOR THE COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT 1999 SEWER AND WATER UTILITY SERVICE CHARGES, RECYCLING PROGRAM FEES, ANNUAL SERVICE CHARGES FOR THE ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT (SEPTIC) INSPECTION PROGRAM, AND GENERAL SERVICE FEES Whereas, the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota has enacted certain ordinances under Minnesota Statutes, therefore pursuant to Chapter 3, Chapter 12, Chapter 9, and Chapter 10, Orono City Code pertaining to payment and collection of sewer and water charges and annual service charges for recycling and the on-site sewage treatment (septic) inspection program, and false alarm fees, and developers improvement fees; and Whereas, the charges identified in the attached list of properties are delinquent in nature; and Whereas, the City haS obtained from the Hennepin County Auditor, levy number 14738 for the delinquent accounts; and Whereas, the City hereby authorizes and directs the Hennepin County Auditor to extend upon the property tax lists of the County and further collect said assessments thereon, as provided by law; and WTiereas, the City hereby authorizes and directs tlie Hennepin County Auditor to add eight percent (8°/'o) interest, as directed, to all amounts due. Therefore, Be It Resolved, that the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota hereby authorizes and directs the County Auditor of Hemicpin County to assess properties identified in the attached list, made a part hereof, for the amounts of delinquent utilities/fees appearing along w ith such properties, plus eight percent (8%) interest added as directed. Said amounts to be collected along with property taxes collected in 2000. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on November 22, 1999. AITEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mavor R£S(K>RDDLLINQt'F RES Page 1 of 1 1999 water & sewer payable______ Levy___^ Property Addition Number Identification# Number 147^^)2-117-23-31-0014 42560 14738 ^36-118-23-41-0031 42310 14738 :17-117-23-22-0028 42060 T4738 T7-117-23-22-0025 ■ 42060 t— 14738 17-117-23-23-0017 42225 14738 *17-117-23-44-0042 43540 14738 17-117-23-44-0108 43540 14738 17-117-23-34-0024 01777 14738 17-117-23-44-0096 43540 14738 17-117-23-44-0033 ' 43540 14738 ‘20-117-23-12-0014 42720 14738 20-117-23-12-0021 42720 14738 20-117-23-31-0032 43088 14738*20-117-23-31-0055 43300* 14738 20-117-23-31-0063 00373 14738 20-117-23-43-0035 43640 14738 20-117-23-43-0022 43300 14738 20-117-23-43-0053 43300 r' h-- ► -■ r -- 14738 20-117-23-43-0043 43640 ‘14738 17-117-23-44-0022 43540 14738 17-117-23-43-0122 43620' J 4738 17-117-23-43-0011 42740 14738 ■ 17-117-23-43-0140 42740 ‘14738 *17-117-23-22-0029 42060 ‘14738 ‘17-117-23-23-0019 42510 14738 18-117-23-14-0005 42220 14738*20-117-23-24-0013 42020 14738 ■ 20-117-23-24-0040 42020 14738 20-117-23-42-0033 * 43480 14738 17-117-23-41-0004 43040 14738 * 17-117-23-41 -0028 * 42180 14738 *20-117-23-12-0054 02278 14738 20-117-23-11-0004 41390 14738 20-117-23-11-0004 41390 14738 *20-117-23-14-0026 *42420 14738 21-117-23-23-0033 43530 14738 *17-117-23-43-0064 42740 14738*17-117-23-43-0076 42740 14738 * 17-117-23-43-0074 42740 14738*17-117-23-43-0087 42740 14738*17-117-23-43-0044 42740 14738 17-117-23-43-0056 42740 14738 17-117-23-43-0051 42740 14738 17-117-23-34-0034 01777 14738 36-118-23-41-0049 00792 14738 21-117-23-22-0008 43220* 14738 21-117-23-21-0004 43220 14738 17-117-23-44-0058 43540 14738 17-117-23-44-0059 43600 14738 08-117-23-34-0050 42200 14738 17-117-23-31-0041 43620 Account# 0-30521-00-1 1-10102-00-2 1-11750-00-6 1-1T800-00-8‘ 1-11940-00-7 1-12240-00-7 0-12260-00-3 1-12265-01-1 1-12300-00-2 Certified Amount ‘340.55 ‘658.15 486.64 645*46 493.62 168.90 871.14 151.47 717J7 as of 11/17/99 Service Address 521 Hanlon Ave 1-12305-00-7 1-12447-00-8 1-12454-00-8 1-12916-00-3 1-12917-00-4 1-12965-00-7 1-13040-00-2 1-13205-0^9 1-13271-00-6 1-13277-0_0j;2 1-13405-00-3 1-13447-00-7 1-13485-00:7 1-13505-00-0 1-21755-00-4 1-21825-00-‘2 1-21981-00:3 1-22700-00-3 1-22720-00-9 1-33532-00-2 “ 1-42162-00-7 1-42180-00-1 1-42503-00-8 1-42595-00-7 1-42597-00-9 1-42625-00-3 1-42700-01-2 1-43443-00-2 1-43444-01-6 1-43472-01-3 1-43473-01-4 1-43525-00-5 1 -43536-00-9 1-43599-00-0 1 -43690-00-8 1-50233-00-1 1-52530-00-7 1-52665-00-8 1-53220-00-2 1-53320-00-9 1-53655-00-4 1-72100-00-6 102 Chevy Chase Dr 1755 Fagerness Pt 1800 Concordia St —i 1940 Concordia St 2240 Bayview PI ----_4 2260 Bayview 2265 Blaine Ave 448.62 659.42 563.64 200.53 312.78 151.12 688.77 610.61 530.00 496.61 519.48 281.37 525.06 431.54 486.64 342 87 606.37 667.61 279.16 691.15 134.16 159.88 314.49 619.79 580.57 191.57 332.16 134.16 305.66 436.42 55849 641.06 534.93 411 34 146.68 842 19 1064.95 780.94 473.14 548.82 673.89 676.67 2300 Tonkawa ^ 2305 Bayview PI 2447 Carman Rd 2454 Casco P^Rd 2916 Casco Pt Rd 2917 Casco Pt Rd 2965 Casco Pt Rd 3040 Casco R _ 3205 Casco Cir 3271 Casco Cir 3277 Casco Cir 3405 Crystal Bay Rd 3447 Crystal PI 3485 Crystal PI___ 3505 Crystal PI 1755 Fagerne ss Pt Rd 1825 Fagerness R Rd 1981 Fagerness Pt Rd 2700EtherAve___ 2720 Ethel Ave __ 3532 Ivy PI ___ 2162 Kenwood Way 2180 Kenwood Way 2503 Kelly Ave ” 2595 Lydiard Cir 2597 Lyrdiard Cir 2625 Kelly Ave 2700 Kelly Ave 3443 Livingston Ave 3444 Livingston 3472 Lyric Ave 3473 Lyric Ave 3525 Livingston Aye 3536 Lyric Ave 3599 Livingston Ave 3690 Lyric Ave ___ 233 Northgate Rd__ 2530 Old Beach^d^ 2665 Maple Ridge La 1901 Beach La __ 3320 Navarre La_ 3655 North Shor e Dr 2100 Shadywood -4 I— U- I— I-— i- I ► — — L- I f— f — I t. 01244 42940 43085 42740' 42740 42420 431JJ 42420' 42420 42^20 42420 ^1333 41900 41900 42540 42140 42520 14738 17-117-23-43-0134 43620 14738 17-i 17-23-43-0132'43620 U738 17-117-23^3-0144 *01122 “ 14738 17-117-23-43-0129 “43620 1*4738 ■ 17-117-23-43-0124 *43620 14738 17-1 i7“-23 “-43-0002‘ 42740 14738 17-117-23-44-0074' 43600“ 14738 20-117-23-11 -0031 * 14738 21-117-23-24-0003 14738 2l “-li 7-23-24-0065 14738 17-117-23-43-0098 14738 “17-117-23-43-0095 14738 17-117-23-31-0030 14738 17-117-23-31-0017 14738 17-117-23-31 -0040 ‘ 14738 ‘ 17-117-23-34-0004* 14738 20-1 17-23-22-OOOr “14738 20-1 1J-23-22-0002 147^8 33-118-23-13-0002“ 14738 05-117-23-14-0043 14738 05-1“ 17-23-14-0031*' 14738 ■ 10-117-23-31 -0072 ■ 1*4“738 “10-11*7-23-31-0022 14738 *10-117-23-31-0057' 14738 10-117-23-31-0050* 14738 08-117-23-44-0006 14738 * 08-117-23-33-0027 14738 07-117-23-12-0009 14738 26-118-23-33-0024 14738 07-117-23-12-0019 14738 02-117-23-43-0026 14738 07-117-23-41-0030 14738 05-117-23-13-0032 14738 05-117-23-13-0052 14738 05-117-23-13-0039 14738 33-118-23-44-0016 14738 07-117-23-44-0027 14733 07-117-23-44-0020 14738 07-117-23-44-0026 14738 07-117-23-44-0021 14738 04-117-23-22-0006 14738 04-117-23-22-0026 14738 04-117-23-23-0010 14738 06-117-23-41-0021 14738 08-117-23-23-0020 14738 26-118-23-33-0030 14738 27-118-23-42-0010 14738 02-117-23-31-0011 14738 06-117-23-41-0080 14738 17-117-23-14-0018 14738 17-117-23-23-0002 14738 07-117-23-14-0062 14738 07-117-23-41-0054 14738 08-117-23-33-0063 1-72199-00-2 1-72213-00-9 1-72229-00-8“ 1-72237-00-9 1-72264-00-5 42520 42005 42180 42235 42^390 42230 42760 43120 41900 41900 470.51 42210 42300 42300 42300 42300 43109 03093 41520 42620 42460 41360 42470 42560 42620 42440 41307 41307 43120 42280 1-72296-00-6 1 -72324-00-0 1-72465-00-0 1-72705-00-3* 1- 72740-00-0 “l-73412:p1j4j '1-73468-00-2 *1-73660-00-8 *1-73725-00-8 “l -73765-00j;0“ *1-73790-00-4 * 1-73925-00£2 * 1 -73935-00-5 *1-82685-00-£ *2-10300-00-4 *2-10325-00-5 ■2-11245-06^3 *2-11251-01^5 ■2-11335-01-6* *2-11395-0*0j “2-13220-0*0-6 “2-13907-00-0 2- 20805-00-7 ■ 2-20930-00-8 ■ 2-20945-00-6“ ■2-21165-00-5 2-21305-00:1 2-23405-00-6 2-23415-00-9 2-23435-00-5 *2-30051-00-5 2-34166-00-6 2-34167-00-7 2-34174-00-7 2-34175-00-8 2-40140-00-1 2-40200-00-6 2-40400-00-0 2-40480-00-4 2-41127-00-1 2-41586-00-6 2-41840-00-9 2-50570-00-1 2-50615-00-5 2-51055-00-4 2-51060-00-2 2-51160-00-9 2-51368-00-1 2-51525-00-0 129.53 212.45 337.88 4_64^29 “752.81 140*61 613.34 638.89 1253.62 586.84 i257.“32 165.07 891.63 493.62 252.47 371.90 235^26 550.63 1870.09 385.44 385.44 385.44 ‘385.44 “158 06 385.44 290;56 480 32 195.67 *137.27 385.44 385.44 385.44 195.68 385.44 385.44 385.44 385.44 385.44 385.44 385.44 29056 385.43 385.43 385.44 105 68 182.91 199 38 385.44 208.06 385.44 385.44 290.56 385.44 480.32 2199 Shadywood 2213 Shadywood 2227 Shadywood 2237 Shadywood 2264 Shadywood 2296 Shadywood Rd 2324 Shadywood Rd 2465 Shadywood 2705 Shadywood Rd 2740 Shadywood Rd 3416 Shoreline ____ 3468 Shoreline Dr 3660 Togo Rd 3725 Togo Rd ' 3765 Togo Rd 3790 Shoreline ____ 3925 Shoreline Dr 2420 Old Beach Rd 2687 Wayzata ^d 300 Crestview _ 325 Crestview Ave 1245 Arbor St 1251 Brown Rd S 1335Briarst _ 1395 Brown Rd S 3220 Bohns Pt La 3907 Cherry Ave 805 Forest Arms La 930 Dakota Ave ___ 945 Forest Arms La 1165 Ferndale Rd W 1305 Elmwood Av _ 3405 Eastlake St 3415 Eastlake St^ 3435 Eastlake St 51 Hackberry hill 4166 Highwood Rd_ 4175 Highwood W 4174 Highwood Rd 4175 HighwoodJRd 140 Leaf St “ “ 200 Leaf St 400 Leaf St 480 Linden Ave 1127 Loma Linda Av 1586 Long Lake Blvd 1840 Lakeview Ter 570 Orono Orchard Rd 615 Mtka Highlands 1055 North Arm Dr 1060 North Shore Dr W 1160 North Arm Dr 1368 North ArmJDr 1525 Minnie Ave 14738 ,08-117-23-33-0075 '42280 12-51540-00-1 '' 385.44 1540 North Arm Dr 14738 10-117-23-31-0004 41310 i 2-52080-00-7 i 385.44 1 2080 North Shore Dr t 14738 08-117-23-41-0007 141308 2-53260-00-4 i 397.82 3260 North Shor eDr 14738 08-117-23-41-0009 41308 2-53268-00-2 !! 276.32 3268 North Shore Dr t 14738 08-117-23-41-0012 41308 ! 2-53324-01-6 1148.22 3324 North Shore Dr 14738 07-117-23-44-0062 42300 : 2-54056-00-2 385.44 4056 North Shore Dr ' 14738 07-117-23-34-0003 41940 2-54425-Ob-O i 385.44 4425 North Shore Dr 14738 07-117-23-31-0001 41940 2-54445-00-6 385.44 4445 North Shore Dr 14738 07-117-23-32-0030 43080 2-61310-00-1 385.44 130 Rest Pt La 14738 07-117-23-31-0023 43080 2-62348-00-8 i 366.03 1348 Rest Pt Cir 14738 10-117-23-31-0007 41310 2-61360-00-6 'r 235.44 1360 Railroad Av i A 14738 10-117-23-31-0006 41310 2-61380-00-2 “385.44 1380 Railroad Ave 14738 "07-117-23-41-0071 '43120 2-61388-00-0 208.06 1388 Park DR 14738 07-117-23-33-0004 43360 ■ 2-61398-00-3 385.43 1387 Rest PtRd 14738 10-117-23-31-0058 42520 ’2-62195-00-5 ! 385.44 2195 Prospect Ave 14738 05-117-23-14-0039 *41900 ' 2-70340-00-4 290.56 340 Tonka Ave 1 14738 02-117-23-31-0018 42560 *2-71300-00-1 94.88 1300 Shoreline Dr 14738 ■08-117-23-42-0004 '42500 2-71365-00-4 ! 119.64 1365 Tonkawa Rd 14738 ’ 07-117-23-32-0003 *42000 ! 2-74725-00-7 1 480.32 4725 Tonkaview La 1 14738 ‘33-118-23-44-0032 *42210 2-80051-00-0 290.56 51 Willow br N 14738 05-117-23-23-0040 '42320 1 2-80309-00-4 1 385.44 309 Westlake St 147r3 ' 05-117-23-23-0024 42320 2-80341-00-8 276.32 341 Westlake St 14738 05-117-23-23-0014 42320 2-80348-00-5 r 385.44 348 Westlake St 14738 07-117-23-21-0013 42700 “2-81001-00-4 ! 195.67 1001 WildhurstTr ■ ' 14738 ‘07-117-23-31-0037 43176 ^2-81200-00-7 ■ 97.84 1200 Wildhurst Tr ^ 14738 '07-117-23-31-0038 43500 2-81261-00-6 195.68 1261 WildhurstTr 14738 04-117-23-22-0003 "41520 ! 2-83195-00-0 i 385.44 3195 Watertown Rd^ ....... --- 1 ____ .1 i : $56,799.38 1 1 ..Kl -- ■ I —f»1999 SEPTIC as of 11/17/99 > ' ' ---------- ■ 1 'Levy #PID# i Addition STREET ACCOUNT #Amount ' 14738 03-117-23-12-0010 42395 130 Brown Rd S 4-10130-01-2 83.08 i 14738 23-117-23-23-0020 42660 160 Big Island 4-10160-00-8 60.00 14738 23-117-23-32-0027 , 42660 300 Big Island 4-10300-00-4 60.00 ■ 14738 23-117-23-32-0002 42660 460 Big Island 4-10460-00-9 60.00 14738 22-117-23-31-0032 05046 620 Big Island 4-10620-00-1 60.00 ' 14738 22-117-23-24-0008 43060 700 Big Island '4-10700-00-2 60.00 ' 14738 23-117-23-22-0009 42660 750 Big Island 4-10750-00-7 60.00 ! 14738 10-117-23-24-0002 41310 1045 S. Brown Rd 4-11045-00-9 83.08 14738 04-117-23-11-0011 02550 2565 Countryside 4-12565-00-9 83.08' 14738 04-117-23-12-0016 05343 2775 Countryside DrW 4-12775-00-6 83.08 , 14738 05-117-23-12-0021 03941 3485 Christine Dr 4-13485-00-7 83.08' ' 14738 31-118-23-42-0009 42030 4325 Chippewa La 4-14325-00-1 83.08 14738 31-118-23-34-0012 02554 4440 Bayside Rd 4-14440-00-9 83.08 ' 14738'06-117-23-22 0009 05490 4645 Bayside Rd '4-14645-00-8'83.08 ! 14738 30-118-23-33-0005 04183 4680 Creekwood Tr 4-14680-00-5 8'3.08 ■ Ti4738 31-118-23-33-0007 41331 4740 Bayside Rd 4-14740-00-0 83.08 i 14738 02-117-23-33-0001 41302 1485 Fox St 4-21485-00-2 73.08 14738 03-117-23-13-0006 42270 1945 Fox Ridge Rd 4-21945-00-5 83.08 ’ : 14738 04-117-23-43-0002 41500 ' 2765 Fox St 4-22765-00-6 83.08 14738 '33-118-23-43-0024 02574 120 Golden View 4-30120-00-2 83.08 i 14738 25-118-23-44-0015 03735 ■ 200 Hollander Rd 4-30200-00-3 83.08 : 14738 31-118-23-11-0010 03194 760 Hunt Farm Rd 4-30760-00-6 83.08 ; 14738 05-117-23-12-0001 41440 ' 3445 High La 4-33445-00-1 83.08. _ _ _ ^ 14738 27-118-23-42-0015 42470 1865 Lakeview Ter 4-41865-00-0 83.08 ^ 14738 36-118-23-33-0009 '42710 10 Myrtlewood Rd 4-50010-00-8 83.08 ' 14738 36-118-23-33-0013 42710 15 Myrtlewood Rd 4-50015-00-3 83.08 '14738 35-118-23-33-0003 41335 105 Orono Orchard Rd N 4-50105-00-7 83.08' ; '14738 04-117-23-11-0009 02550 145 Manor Cir 4-50145-00-9 83.68 ! 14738 ’ 14738 33-118-23-43-0006 03369 160 Old Crystal Bay N 4-50160-00-0 83.08' 02-117-23-21-0009 42840 190 Orono Orchard Rd S 4-50190-00-9 83.08 ■ 14738 33-118-23-31-0007 41333 225 Old Crystal Bay 4-50225-00-0 ............83.08 14733 33-118-23-31-0011 02362 265 Old Crystal Bay N 4-50265-00-2 83.08 14738 02-117-23-24-0003 41640 280 Orono Orchard Rd S 4-50280-00-3 8308 14738 33-118-23-31-0005 41333 285 Old Crystal Bay Rd N 4-50285-00-8 83.08 14738 06-117-23-23-0004 ■41306 '330 North Shore Dr W 4-50330-00-5 83 08 14738 '32-118-23-23-0003 '42820 500 Orchard Park Rd 4-50500-01-3 83.08 14738 07-117-23-22-0005 41307 840 North Shore Dr W 4-50840-00-3 83;08 14738 05-117-23-12-0009 '41440 40 Stubbs Bay Rd S 4-70040-01-6 83.08 14738 02-117-23-21-0019 42840 145 Smith Ave 4-70145-00-5 83.08 14738 33-118-23-42-0005 03842 380 Silver Meadow Dr 4-70380-00-6 83:08 14738 32-118-23-21-0005 '41332 605 Stubbs Bay Rd N 4-70605-00-8 83.08 14738 25-118-23-33-0004 41325 725 Sixth Ave 4-70725-00-7 83 08 14738 26-118-23-31-0004 41326 1300 6th Ave N 4-71300-00-1 83.08 14738 05-117-23-21-0004 42273 2060 Shoreline Dr 4-72060-00-7 83.08 14738 29-118-23-44-0001 41329 ■ 3225 Sixth Ave N 4-73225-00-3 83.08 14738 29-118-23-41-0005 41329 3240 Sixth Ave N 4-73240-00-4 83.08 14738 29-118-23-41-0005 41329 ■ 3260 Sixth Ave 4-73260-00-0 83.08 14738 32-118-23-22-0003 42820 3825 6th Ave N 4-73825-00-5 83.08 14738 31-118-23-12-0011 43210 4360 Sixth Ave N 4-74360-00-6 83 08 14738 '31-118-23-12-0018 41331 4380 Sixth Ave N 4-74380-00-2 83 08 14738 t ........................- ■ . ,02-117-23-24-0001 41640 i 1315WoodhillAv 4-81315-00-2 83.08 : 14738 27-118-23-43-0015 r^390 ! 1889 West Farm Rd 4-81889-00-2 83.08 14738 03-117-23-34-0009 43570 2160 Webber Hills Rd 4-82160-00-7 83.08 14738 33-118-23-34-0004 41333 2900 Watertown Rd 4-82900-00-5 83.08 14738 33-118-23-33-0001 41333 3020 Watertown Rd 1 4-83020-00-7 1 83.08 14738 32-118-23-44-0009 41332 3405 Watertown Rd 4-83W05-00-4 1 83.08 14738 32-118-23-32-0001 i 41332 3940 Watertown Rd 4-83940-00-6 i 83.08 u31-118-2^1-0005 ! 41331 4085 Watertown Rd 4-84085-00-9 i 83.08 14738 131-118-23-24-0001 i141331 4480 Watertown Rd 1 4-84480-00-2 83.08 14738 T3-1 18-23-21-0002 41331 1 4520 Watertown Rd 14-84520-01-4 j 83.08 14738 31-118-23-21-0003 41331 ' 4560 Watertown Rd 4-84560-00-3 iI 83.08 14738 31-118-23-31-0007 04293 [4575 Wolverton PI 4-84575-01-4 i 83.08 14738 07-117-23-22-0016 03487 i4701 West Branch Rd i4-W701-00-0 i 83.08 j 1 ' 1 1 ' $5,085.56 1999 General Servicedi Levy #Property 1 Certified Address Identification#1 1 Amount ♦ 14738 03-117-23-13-0007 55.00 i 1985 Fox Ridge Rd 14738 103-117-23-12-0010 55.00 130 Brown Rd 14738 04-117-23-11-0005 1 124.00 1 2435 Countryside Dr 14738 104-117-23-4^-0021 165.001 730 Gander Rd ' 14738 105-117-23-12-0010 549.10'3580 Bayside Rd 14738 05-117-23-14-0018 ! 55.00! i 290 Crestview ! 14738 105-117-23-21-0023 1456.00 1 3750 Bayside RD 14738 108-117-23-41-0012 1430.00 i i 3324 North Shore Dr 14738 117-117-23-22-0034 • 319.50' i 1735 Fagemess Pt Rd 14738 17-117-23-41-0019 63.90 !3329 Crystal Bay rd 14738 ,32-118-23-43-0005 1 550.001 3535 Watertown Rd ;14738 134-118-23-21-0010 ! 330.00 i 2003 Sugarwood Drive COUNCIL MBETINO NOV 2 2 W99REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION cut or unONO DATE: November 18,1 999 ITEM NO: Sk 3 Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse City Administrator ’s Title Cit\' Administrator Report Item Description: Renewal of Police Service Contracts The Cities of Spring Park and Minnetonka Beach have approved the renewal of their contracts for police services for the year 2000. The City of Long Lake has approved the renewal of the police services contract for the years 2000/2001/2002. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the renewal of the police service contracts with the Cities of Spring Park and Minnetonka Beach for the year 2000, and to approve the renewal of the police service contract with the City of Long Lake for the years 2000, 2001 and 2002. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 t999 DATE: Nove,2^^yj99out ITEM NO: 5? J Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Renewal of Animal Control Service Contracts for Year 2000 The Cities of Excelsior, Tonka Bay and Shorewood have approved the renewal of the animal control services contract for the year 2000. The animal control service arrangement continues to be beneficial to both Orono and the cities served. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the renewal of the animal control contracts with the cities of Excelsior, Tonka Bay and Shorewood for the year 2000. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCfL MEETING NOV 2 2 1999 DATE: ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Funding for the Acquisition of the Property at 3790 Shoreline Drive When the Council approved the purchase of the property at 3790 Shoreline Drive for at least partial parkland use, the funding was approved from the Building Capital Outlay Fund for two reasons. 1. 2. The City may want to use a portion of the property for other than park use. There was a concern that if the purchase was funded through the Park Fund, the property could be restricted to park use only. The amount of funding available in the Park Fund was insufficient to cover the full cost of the acquisition. Although the staff recommendation was to fund the acquisition from the Building Capital Outlay Fund, the Finance Director has advised that the resolution establishing the Building Capital Outlay Fund did not make a provision for using the fund as a source of funding for the purchase of parkland. The resolution (attached) is focused only on funding for e.xpenditures related to facilities. Based on this finding, staff has identified three options to address the funding of the acquisition of the property at 3790 Shoreline Drive. 1.Amend the resolution establishing the Building Capital Outlay Fund to broaden the allowable use of the fund to inelude parkland acquisition. 2. Use General Fund reserves to fund the acquisition. 3.Use a combination of General Fund reserves and Park Fund reserves to reflect that a portion of the property will remain as parkland and a portion may be used for non ­ park use. Importance of Preserving the Building Capital Outlay Fund Although stafl'does not have a problem with amending the Building Capital Outlay Fund resolution to include funding for parkland acquisition, staff does recommend that a limitation be placed on the amount of parkland acquisition that can come from the Building Capital Outlay Fund. This fund is a very important asset to the City. It provides interim funding for capital projects; it provides funding for repairs needed to the City facilities; interest earnings from the fund are being used to pay a substantial portion of the debt service on the City facilities; and the fund is an important element in the City's credit rating. It is important this fund be used conser\atively so that it can be substantially preserved over the long term. Request for Council Action continued Page 2 November 19, 1999 Funding for the Acquisition of the Property at 3790 Shoreline Drive Staff Recommendation It is staffs recommendation that the purchase of the property be funded 50% from the General Fund and 50% from the Park Fund, and that the attached resolution be adopted to clarify that the purchase is being funded from both funds to enable a portion of the property to be used for non-park use if the Council so decides. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution clarifying the funding of the purchase of the property at 3790 Shoreline Drive, and to amend the 1999 General Fund and Park Fund budgets to reflect the expenditure of $80,000 from each fimd. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY AT 3790 SHORELINE DRIVE TO BE FUNDED PARTIALLY FROM THE GENERAL FUND AND PARTIALLY FROM THE PARK FUND WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized the purchase of the property at 3'< Shoreline Drive for the purpose of providing parkland for the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, in order to provide a public vehicular access through a portion of ; property to County Road 15, it may be preferable for the southern portion of the property t e developed for residential use; and WHEREAS, because there is a possibility that the southern portion of the pr erty may be used for a non-park use, the funding for the property is being provided partially fr n the General Fund and partially from the Park Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Coi il does hereby authorize the property at 3790 Shoreline Drive to be purchased using S80,000 « General Fund reserves and $80,000 of Park Fund reserves to preserve the flexibility to use a por m of the property for a non-park use. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regu • meeting held this 22nd day of November, 1999. Gabriel Jabbour, Mavor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 1 of 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 1999 CITY OF ORONO DATE: November 19, 1999 ITEM NO : Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:m Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Billing Regarding Woodhill Country Club Litigation Attached is a letter from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) summarizing the total costs incurred regarding the Woodhill Country Club litigation, and indicating the amount for which the City is responsible. Although there was no payment made to Woodhill Country Club regarding its claim, the LMCIT did incur defense costs in the amount of $117,315.32. The City’s share of these costs is $10,597.29. In addition, the City paid $19,854.15 to Hinshaw Culbertson for legal assistance provided by Tom Barrett. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the payment of $10,597.29 to the LMCIT for the City's share of the defense costs related to the Woodhill Country Club litigation. League of Minnesota CrVrW Citiffi promotiftif QxcoUtncQ t ' 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 Pkonc: (651) 281-1200 • (800) 925-1122 TDD (651) 281-1290 LMC Fax: (651) 281-1299 • LMCIT Fax: (651) 281-1298 Wet Site: tttp://www.lmnc.or^ November 2, 1999 Ronald Moorse, City Administrator City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 RE: Trust Member: City of Orono Claimant: Woodhill Country Club BRACFile: 11023313 Dear Mr. Moorse: As you know, this claim has come to a conclusion. The plaintiff alleged that the City illegally barricaded Woodhill Avenue and the west entrance to their property. The plaintiff alleged that the City’s actions constituted an unlawful and unconstitutional confiscation of their private property without due process of law. There was no claim payment. However, we did incur $117,3 i 5.32 in legal defense costs. Attached is our computer printout reflecting the payments. As per my letter of July 10, 1998, LMCIT handled this claim as a land use or development litigation. The coverage agreement states that LMCIT will pay 100% of the first $50,000 of defense costs and 85% of the next $200,000 of defense costs. The amount LMCIT pays for damages or defense costs for land use or development litigation is subject to the Municipal Liability Deductible shown in the Municipal Liability Declarations. That deductible is $500.00 per occurrence. In this case, the City’s responsibility is $10.5 97.29. That is based on the $500.00 deductible plus 15% of $67,315.32. Please issue a check for^l0,597.2^ayable to LMCIT and forward it to this office. .Attach a copy of this letter with your checlT ar reference our file number of 11023313 on the check. If you have any questions, feel free to c< ntact me at 651-281-1282. V ,Very' truly yours. BERKLEY RISK ADMINISTRATORS COMPANY, LLC N l^Iark Rossow Asst. Program Claims Manager AN EQUALOPPORTUNITY/AFFIBMATIVI: ACTION I MPLOVLR Print Key Output 5769881 V4R2M0 980228 BERKLEY Paqe 1 11/03/99 06:51:56 Display Device. . . . .: LMD010181 User. . . . . . . . . . . . .: MARKR Claim Inquiry - By Claim Reserve/Paysmnts Bumnary MARK 11/03/99 06:51:54 Inquire Policy CMC 18285 Insured ORONO Current Reserves Indemnity Expense 1 Expense 2 Total Payments 117,315.32 State 22 Total Incurred 117,315.32 Total 117,315.32 117,315.32 Claim 11023313 Loss Date 6/12/98 Loss Reserve Expense Reserve Paid Loss Paid Expense 117315.32 l-View Claimant Detail 2-View Claim Master F3«Exit F12»Cancel COUNCIL MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 2 2 |999 DATE: NoveWjer49,J»9S5!,^^ ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Eh Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval On Sale Liquor & Sunday Jimmie's Lounge 3380 Shoreline Drive Off Sale Liquor 12 Hi Liquor 2160 West Wayzata Boulevard Navarre Liquors Inc. 3421 Shoreline Drive Club Spring Hill Golf Club 725 Sixth Avenue North Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata Boulevard Woodhill Country Club 200 Woodhill Road Gambling Lions Mound Northwest Tonka Club - Resolution (Navarre Lanes, 3435 Shoreline Drive) Minnesota Multiple Sclerosis Society - Resolution (Jimmie's Lounge, 3380 Shoreline Drive) Note: This permit was approved at the September 13, 1999 Council meeting. Due to the change in ownership of Jimmie's Lounge, the Multiple Sclerosis Society has requested an updated resolution. Kennel Chris Tully 1355 North Arm Drive COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed liccnse(s). Minnesota Department of Public Safety ALCOHOL AND GAMBLCS'G ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 44; Cedar Sl, Suite 133, St Paul, MN 55101-5133 Fax (651)297-5259 (651)296-6979 TTY (651)282-6555 CERTIFICATION OF AN ON SALE AND/OR SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE No license wUl be approved or releaaed untU the W .j Workers Compensation Insurance Company l^c/ __________________Policy # 0 f ------------ LICENSEE'S SALES & USE TAX ID # ^ 1 To apply for sales tax number, call (651)296-6181 or 1-800-657-3777 CITY OF Or oho ISSUING AUTHORITY COUNTY OF Licensee Name (Corporation, Partnership, LLC, Individual) DOB ^\a- ZDuunt! ^hk-ef‘iT [2 Social Security #Trade Name or DBA \i I ou^u. Business License “Typ t Dn Sal^ OiTSaRT-t« License Typ e (Check one or both) ( Sunda^ Fee Paid to tiny City C> FSatTLicense Number License Period / . From Vt/a.g"»-‘ To ^ ^ II Sunday License Number *H006, CC __________ a corporation, partnersnip, LLC, state the name date ot oirth, social security »and address ol each partner or olHccr. Fee Paid to City CC Zip Code . .13-4?/ County Business Partner/Ofl'iccr Name (First, middle and last;DOB Title Address Parmer/Officcr Name (First, middle and last)DOB SSI#Title Address Partncr/Officcr Name (First, middle and las:)DOB SSI#Title Address The Licensee must have one of the following; Check one (ATTACH CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE TO THIS FORM.) Liquor Liability Insurance (Dram Shop) - 550,000 per person; 5100,000 more than one person; 510,000 Property Destruction; S50.000 and 5100,0<X) for loss of means of support. B. A bond of a surety company with rrinimum coverage as specified above in A. C. A certificate from the State Treasurer that the licensee has deposited with the State, Trust Funds having a market value of SIOO.OOO r*^c^ f\r ^^rnrift^c Yes (^N^^uring the past license year has a sumrr.ons been issued under the Liquor Civil Liability Law (Dram Shop)? If yes, attach a copy of the summons.________________________ leck those items that apply Circle one Transaction T>pcCNc^ Rcvoke'Canccl Transfer Suspension Suspcnd/Revoke-'Cancellcd From To Transfer of ownership from (Name and Address) I certifk that this license was approved in an official meeting by the governing body of the city or county. City Clerk’s Signature Date IMPORTANT NOTICE All retail liquor licensees must have a current Federal Special Occupational Stamp. This stamp U issued b> the Bureau Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. For information call (651)290-3496 __________________(PS 9011-98)_____________ TO: FROM: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Lin Vee, City Clerk November 19,1999 SUBJECT: On Sale and Sunday Liquor License for Jimmies Lounge, 3380 Shoreline Drive Per Police Chief Gary Cheswick, the background investigation conducted for the liquor license transfer which was approved at the Special Council meeting of November 4 will also apply to the new applicatioM for 2000. 5^ Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement ■U4 Cedar St.. Suite 133 St. Paul.NLN 55101-5133 6i:-296-(Si:'0 • TTY612-23:-6555 • F.AX 612-297-5259 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, OR CLUB LICENSE No licsnie uiU be approved or released ur.u! Lbe 520 Retailer ID Card fee is received by SIN Liquor Cocrot Licensee: Please verify your license informanon contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clcrk/'County .Auditor should submit this signed renev^al with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County .Auditor arc also required by M.S. 340.A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code __QE License Period Ending ID ».I n D5 Citv/Countv where license approved □ r o r. o Licensee Name 12 Hi Liquor Inc. Trade Name 12 Hi Liquor Licensed Location address 2120 L City. State. Zip Code Long Lake, Business Phone; £12) 2A3-92S3 • » errr Z I II « ^ ^ ^ LICENSE FEES: Off Sale S 150. C On Sale S Sundav S By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership or the above named licensee For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. .Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following will result in fines. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so. gr-e details on back of this application 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked tor any liquor law violation (State or local) If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or cnminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below 5 Licensee confirms that dunng the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) .MS 340.A.S02 If yes. attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license penod. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. SIOO.OOO in cash or securities or SlOO, 000 surety bond may be submitted In lieu of liquor liability. Licensee Sicnature Date (S.inature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county. Citv Clerk'Countv .Auditor Signature Date i Signarare certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/ccunty as stated above Countv Attomev Signature Date Countv Board issued licenses onlv (Sianarure certifies licensee is eligible for license).• • • Police.Shenff Sisnature Date iSignarare certifies licensee or associates have not been cued during the past five years for any statefiocal liquor law violations tcnminal/civil). Report violations on back, then sign here. Date:November 17, 1999 To:Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police. Subject: Liquor License - Off Sale I have reviewed the application submitted by William Wear on behalf of the 12-Hi Liquor. Routine background checks were conducted and no problems have been found. I have no objection to the issuance of this license. m:r Minnesota Dep:_'.ment of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 444 Ceair St.. Suite 133 St. Paul.V.N 55101-5133 612-296-6430 • TTY 6i;-;32-6555 • FAX 612-297-5259 _______RENEWAL OF LIQUOR. WINE, OR CLUB LICENSE______ No license N^ill be approved or released until the >1. Retailer ID Card tcj is received by MN Liquor Control Licensee; Please verify your license information comatr.ed below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clcrk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340.A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code Cr 5*. City/County w here license approved C r o r. g Licensee Name Navarre Liquors Inc. License Period Ending 12/31/.1.3.39 ID #—£i£Ai I Trade Name 3421 Shoreline Zr Licensed Location address Navarre, M.N City. State. Zip Code Business Phone A • Vs/ LICENSE FEES; Off Sale S O". Sale S Sunday S By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies L“.u: there has been no change in ownership or the above named licer.see. For changes in ownership, the licensee named arove. or for new licensees, lull applications should be used. See back of this application for further information necviei to complete this renewal. Ap :licant*s slanature on this renewal confirms the foll.-ming; Failure to report anv of the following will result in fincs. Licen.see confirms it has no interest whatsoever, c.reotly cr imlirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so. give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, plea.se give details cr. ;.he back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it his not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred. ple.:.>e gi\e details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licen- . e confimis that during the past five years or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations base occurrec. plea>e give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license yc_'. a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340.A.8(32. If >c>. attach a copy ■:: the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation i.-.s-.-ance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance cenificale that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securiUerocSlOO. 000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. Licensee Si riatuiy^ (Signature certifies all abovcinfCTnrrtion to b^^nVcct ar j license has been approved by city/county. Citv Clerk/Couniv .Auditor Sisinature Date J (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or clur license has been approved by the city/county as stated above. Countv Attorne' Signature Date County Board issued licenses only (Signature certifies I;..*nsee is eligible for license). Police/Sheriff Signature Date (Signature certifies licensee or associates have not beer. ;.;ed dunng the past live years for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil). Report violations on back, tret sign here.PS 9093-93 Indicate below changes of corporate officers, partners, home addresses or telephone numbers: Indicate beiow anv interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in other liquor establishments; Report below details of liquor law violations (civil or criminal) that have occurred within the last five years. (Dates. ofTenses. fines or other penalties, including Liquor Control Penalties): . * Report beloiv details involving anv license rejections or revocations: Date;November 17,1999 To:Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Subject:Liquor License - Off Sale I have reviewed the application submitted by Steven Corl on behalf of the Navarre Liquors. Routine background checks were conducted and no problems have been found. 1 have no objection to the issuance of this license. Minnesota Department of Public Safety ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 444 Cedar St. Suite 133, St Paul. MN 55101-5133 (651)296-9519 FAX (651)297-5259 TTY (651)282-6555 APPLICATION FOR CLUB ON SALE RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSE This application (PS 9016-98) shall be completed by an officer of the club seeking a license. This application and the proof of '•quor liability Insurance must be filed with the city clerk or the county auditor. To qualify for a license a club must have at least fifty members, been in continuous existence .for at least three years, have an elected governing board and limit sales to members and bona fide guests only. The annual license fee is set by statute (M.S. 340A.408). Granting of a license by the city cr county is discretionary. P i /■ Workers Compensation Insurance Company^* wh( Lo>*-p^< Licensee ’s Sales and Use Tax ID Number Policy if To apply for a sales and use tax number call (651)296-61d1or 1’■BOO-657-3777 Ccrporation Name ih/i Lcense Lcc3tion(Sueet Address) Municipality BuitCing C-vvner's Name k.'e there a-^ delinquentA:e then axes or th; property?Yes (3' iN'ame of Member of Managing Board DOB v/r/w Social Security t Club Trade Name or DBA License Period FROM/-o?/• £> O J0/J “2/'00 County IL State Business Phene Zip Code ^S-29/ Building Owner's Address Club Manager's Name •///» f Oi/ Address .j j \'ame of P/ember of Managing Board • Name of Member of Managing Board same of Member of Managing Board DOB j/yvi DOB Social Securiry U Address ^ Social Security u Address / S'^ 4'fZA iCs.^ A t/^ I 003 Social Security 0 Address The Licensee must have one of the following; CHECK ONE B. c« C. Liquor Liability Insurance(Dram Shop) - $50,000 per person: $100,000 more than one person; $10,000 property destruction: $50,000 and $100,000 for loss of means of support ATTACH "CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE" TO THIS FORM A Surety bo' d from a surety company with minimum coverage as specified above in A. A certificate from the State Treasurer that the Licensee has deposited with the State. T.njst Funds having a market Wul^_ -.1 . W W 1 W 1 W W W W w 1 1 1 C" «9 Datt cf Club Char.er fVettra.-s cr Fraternal ^ ^rganizaten Date of Incorporation /- .2/' ^ 7 Number of Years of Continuous Existence of the Club ^ Number of Years in ^ j Current Quartere ^ Number of Club Members / Will the Club be Issued a Lawful Gambling License? YES Yes Yes 1. 2. 3. Are any members, officer, agents or employees paid profits from the sale of beverages to club members? Are any employees paid salaries? Has applicant, partners, officers or employees ever had any liquor law violations in Minnesota or elsewhere? If yes, give names, dates, and final outcome:_____________________________ Yes 4.£) Yes ^^^No I certify that I have read the above questions and that the answers are true and correct of my own knowledge. 5. 6. Does any wholesaler or manufacture of alcoholic beverages ow or have any interest in furniture, fixtures or equipment for the licensed premises? If yes, give details. During the past license year, has a Summons been issued under the Liquor Civil Liability Law (Dram Shop) M.S. 340A.802? If yes, attach a copy of the Summons. £o Will you serve liquor on Sunday? Amount of Sunday License Fee S ^OO ~~_____ • Signature of A(f^licant /Date Yes No IF LICENSE ISSUED BY THE COUNTY BOARD: REPORT OF COUNTY ATTORNEY I certify that to the best of my knowledge the applicants named above are eligible to be licensed. If no, state reason. Signature County Attorney County Date REPORT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT OR SHERIFF’S OFFICE This Is to certify that the applicant, and the associates, named herein have not been convicted within the past five years for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances relating to Intoxicating Liquor, except s follows: Police Department or Sheriffs Name Title Signature LICENSE APPROVAL OR DENIAL License Granted Denied Signature City Clerk or County Auditor Date LICENSE APPROVAL OR DENIAL License Granted Denied Signature Director Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Date IMPORTANT NOTICE ALL RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSEES MUST HAVE A CURRENT FEDERAL SPECIAL OCCUPATIONAL STAMP. THIS STAMP IS ISSUED BY THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO AND FIREARMS. FOR INFORMATION CALL (651) 2S0-3496 (PS 9016-93) Date:November 17,1999 To:Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Gary Cheswick, Chief of Polic Subject: Liquor License - Club On Sale and Sunday Liquor I have reviewed the application submitted by Timothy Ivory on behalf of the Spring Hill Golf Club. Routine background checks were conducted and no problems have been found. I have no objection to the issuance of this license. V -A ■I- Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 444 Cedar St.. Suite 133 St.Paul.M.N 55101-5133 612-296-6430 • TTY 612-282-6555 • F.\X 612-297-5259 *'**' ______RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, OR CLUB LICENSE______ No license will be approved or released until the S20 Retailer ID Card tec is received by MN Liquor Control Licensee; Plea.se verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County .Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340.A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code MCLQf>I5 License Period Ending .1 S/Z1/ 13 ID #----Li City/County where license approved 0 r o n o Licensee Name Wayzata Country CI u Sd Inc Trade Name U'ayzata Country Club Licensed Location address SCO V*ayzata Blvd/Sox City, State, Zip Code Cr o n o » MN SS391 Business Phone t ol 2) A73-S2AS LICENSE FEES; Off Sale $ OnSaleS 100. CO Sundays 200.00 Bv signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership or the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. ADPlicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the.foUow.i.ng wjll re5WU in filKSi 1. Licensee confimis it has no interest what.soever. directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city /township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this rcnevsal. then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law t Dram Shop) MS 340.A.802. If yes. attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liabilitv insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in ca.^ or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted In lieu of Uquor liability. ^ . Date / /________Licensee Signature (Signature certifies all abo^* infeimati^ to-^^nrect and license has been approved by city/county. DateCity Clerk/County Auditor Signature______________________________________ (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above. Countv .Atto -tcy Signature Date County Boarc issued licenses only (Signature certifies licensee is eligible tor licensei. Police/Sheriff Signature______________________________________________ (Signature certifies licensee or associates have not been cited during the past live years tor any state/local liquor law Violations (criminal/civ il). Report violations on back, then sign here. Date PS 9093-9S Indicate below changes of corporate officers, partners, home addresses or telephone numbers: Indicate below anv interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in other liquor establishments: Report below details of liquor law violations (civil or criminal) that have occurred within the last five years. (Dates. ofTenses. fines nr other penalties, including Liquor Control Penalties): Report below details involving anv license rejections or revocations; Citv/Countv Comments: Date:November 17, 1999 To:Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Policy Subject:Liquor License - Club Liquor I have reviewed the application submitted by Kenneth R. Galloway on behalf of the Wayzata Country Club. Routine background checks were conducted and no problems have been found. I have no objection to the issuance of this license.i ' ’^i Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 444 Cedar St.. Suite 133 St. Paul. ,\IN 55101-5133 612-296-6430 • TTV 612-282-6555 • FAX 612-297-5259 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR. WINE, OR CLUB LICENSE No license will be approved or telea.sed until the S20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by MN Liquor Control % ii i I Licensee; Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any licen.se cancellation. License Code .nr’t^i License Period Ending ID #—231 City/County where license approved C r o n o LicenseeName Woodhill Country Club Inc Trade Name VJoodhill Country Club Licensed Location address CCO UucdMill RJ City, State, Zip Code Cronu, MM C5331 Business Phone t C : 2 5 473-7333 LICENSE FEES: Off Sale S On Sale S ICO.OC Sunday S By sign!’ j ihis renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership or the above named licens.'.*. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back o;‘ this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following will result in lines. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly ..i any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so. give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confir"is that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law viob.ions. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below, 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes. attach a copy the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation in>urance is in effect for the ful; nse period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the lfic‘*nse period in city/county where licease is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be »i4*r.»'Ued in lieu of liquor liability. Licenser -i,f8n.vJre , ft- _____________ Date (Si.uat .ic vciufics all above information to be correct and license has bvcn approved by city/county. City Clerk/Couiuy Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, w ine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above. Couiitv Attomev Sisnature Date County Board issued licenses only (Signature certifio licensee is eligible for license). Police/Sheriff Signature Date (Signature certifies licensee or associates have not been cited during the past five years for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civ il). Report violations on back, then sign here.PS 9093-98 Indicate below changes of corporate officers, partners, home addresses or telephone numberst D» Eldredge Jackson. Ill 473-6415 Charles M. Kelley 475-1280 Lili McMillan 476-8626 Betsy Massie 473-1493 indicate below anv interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in otlier liquor eittahlishments! Report below details of liquor >aw violations (civil or criminal) that have occurred within the last five years. (Dates, offenses, fines nr other penalties, including Liquor Control Penaltip<^; Report below details involving anv license rejections or revocations; Citv/Countv Comments: a Date;November 17,1999 To:Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police- Subject:Liquor License - Club Liquor I have reviewed the application submitted by Mark Albrecht on behalf of the Woodhill Country Club. Routine background checks were conducted and no problems have been found. I have no objection to the issuance of this license. A RESOLUTION GRANTING RENEWAL OF GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT FOR NAVARRE LANES LOCATED AT 3435 SHORELINE DRIVE BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Orono agrees to approve the renewal gambling permit application for the Lions Mound Northwest Tonka Club for operations at Navarre Lanes, 3435 Shoreline Drive. The above listed resolution was moved by and duly seconded by________________________ The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in thener^i ic Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of November, 1999. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk A RESOLUTION GRANTING RENEWAL OF GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT FOR JIMMIE'S LOUNGE LOCATED AT 3380 SHORELINE DRIVE BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Orono agrees to approve the renewal gambling permit application for the Minnesota Multiple Sclerosis Society for operations at Jimmie's Lounge, 3380 Shoreline Drive. The above listed resolution was moved by and duly seconded by________________________ The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of November, 1999. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Owner: KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Efifective January 1,19___to December 31,19 S' 1 Property Address;.kV>4V IS/vu. 0^. (mclude city and zip) Mailing Address (if different) Phone: fhome’l _(work)----- RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:_____O 5c. VM (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: ~ / /-ll. .Icy i v.^y/ / j Purpose for more than 2 dogs:_____e. Dogs normally kept: X inside____kennel structure COMMERCL\L Kennel License Fee: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business;__________________—----------- Business Activities: Normal Business Hours; After Hours Contact: (name), (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation, the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises pnor to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. Applicant Date / fnr City Use Only I / t Kennel inspected by (^) r^nhyn Recommends Approva l ^ Denial ____ Dat e ////^Z^9 KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATIONS Dogs and dog kennels are regulated by Chapter 5.36 of the Municipal Code of Ordinances. No more than two dogs over six months of age can be kept on any property unless a kennel license is obtained. All dogs kept in residential kennels must also be individually licensed by the City, Kennel licenses will not be granted unless the property is fenced or contains a proper kennel structure to prevent the dogs from running at large. Kennel structures (dog houses and/or fenced runs) must be located at least 10 feet from any abutting property line and must otherwise comply with all accessory structure zoning requirements. Kennel structures located within 30 feet of any neighboring property must be licensed even if used for only 1 or 2 dogs. Kennel licenses expire on December 31st of each year. Annual renewal applications are due on or before December 1st of each year. Kennel licenses may be denied or revoked for cause including unsanitary facilities, keeping more dogs than the license authorizes, keeping unlicensed dogs, allowing dogs to run at large or other nuisance complaints. DEFTNinONS KENNEL, COMMERCIAL. A place or premises where three or more dogs over sbc months of age are kept or housed at any one time for commercial purposes including sale, boarding, breeding, grooming, training, or medical care. KENNEL, RESIDENTIAL. An accessory residential use or place where three or more dogs over sbc months of age are kept or housed for the sole non-commercial use, benefit or enjoyment of the property owner or occupant. 19 Nov 1999 Fri 12:11 PM Check Number Check Number 58735 Date Name 58735 OLD REPUBLIC 19-NOV-99 OLD REPUBLIC Check Register City of Orono COUNCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 1999 Page l utl Y OHONU Transaction Amount Comments 635.00 EASEMZ:rr-FAIRVIEW CHURCH Totals Check Number 58735 OLD REPUBLIC 635.00 Check Number 58736 RED APRON CATERING 58736 19-NOV-99 RED APRON CATERING 50.80 BOX LCHES - 10/7/99 M7G Totals Check Number 58736 RED APRON CATERING 50.80 Check Number 58737 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 58737 58V:7 58737 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 Totals Check Number UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 58737 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE -100.00 94.90 284.70 279.60 CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 3RD Q7R UB 3RD CTR UB Check Number 58738 PASS, CAROL ANN k 58738 19-NOV-99 Totals Check Number PASS, CAROL ANN k 58738 PASS, CAROL ANN k 2,500.00 2,500.00 AQUIRE NORTH ARM LANE Check Number 58739 58739 58739 58739 58739 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 Totals Check Number MN DEPT OF REVENUE MN DEPT OF REVENUE MN DEPT OF REVENUE MN DEPT OF RE'/ENUE 58739 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 28.00 1.00 178.00 1.484.00 1.691.00 SALES TAX 9/99 SALES TAX 9/99 SALES TAX 9/99 SALES TAX 9/99 Check Number 58740 RED APRON CATERING 58740 19-NOV-99 Totals Check Number RED APRON CATERING 58740 RED APRON CATERING 101.60 101.60 HWY 12 WORK SESSION Check Number 59764 OLD REPUBLIC 59764 19-NOV-99 Totals Check Number OLD REPUBLIC 59764 OLD REPUBLIC -635.00 -635.00 VOID CK 59764 Check Number 60096 MN STATE TREASURER 60096 I9-NOV-99 MN STATE TREASURER 11.00 TITLE TRANSFER 19 Nov 1999 Fri 12:11 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Check Number Date Name Transaction Amount Comments Check Number 60096 MN STATE TREASURER Totals Check Number 60096 MN STATE TREASURER Check Number 60097 FUZZY DUCK STUDIOS 60097 19-NOV-99 FUZZY DUCK STUDIOS Totals Check Number 60097 FUZZY DUCK STUDIOS 11.00 2«001.10 2«001.10 DENIN SHIRTS 5 Nov 1999 Fri 12:59 PM Check Register City of Orono Check NunOser Employee Name Check Number 046802 046802 PETERSON* BARBARA Totals Check Number 046802 Check Number 046803 046803 MOORSE* RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046803 Check Number 046804 046804 FLINT* RICHARD Totals Check Number 046804 Check Number 046805 046805 JABBOUR* GABRIEL E. Totals Check Number 046805 Check Number 046806 046806 KELLEY* CHARLES Totals Check Number 046806 Check Number 046807 046807 SANSEVERE* ROBERT K. Totals Check Number 046807 Grand Total Check Date OO-Nov-99 08-NOV-99 08-Nov-99 08-NOV-99 08-NOV-99 08-NOV-99 Page 1 Check Amount 269.36 269.36 184.70 184.70 269.36 269.36 323.22 323.22 269.36 269.36 269.36 269.36 1*585.36 17 Nov 1999 Wed 10:31 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046809 046009 JOHNSON, MARY ANN Totals Check Number 046809 Check Number 046810 046810 BERRY, HEIDI N. Totals Check Number 046810 Check Number 046811 046811 HASEMAN, CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 046811 Check Number 046812 046012 MOORSE, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046812 Check Number 046613 046813 VEE, LINDA S. Totals Check Number 046813 Check Number 046814 046814 KUEHN, THOMAS M. Totals Check Number 046814 Check Number 046815 046015 OLSON, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046815 Check Number 046616 046816 PETTIT, SANDRA K. Totals Check Number 046616 Check Number 046617 Check Date 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-Nov-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 Page 1 Check Amount 539.20 539.20 629.74 629.74 760.56 760.56 1,567.06 1,567.06 1,072.10 1,072.10 1,019.22 1,019.22 28.53 28.53 369.66 369.66 '1 17 Nov 1999 Wed 10:33 AM Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046017 046817 ANDERSON. BRUCE L Totals Ch'.Tk Number 046817 Check Number 046813 046818 BOBZIEN, SUE A. Totals Check Number 046818 Check Number 046819 046819 BORIS, SCOTT W. Totals Check Number 046819 Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Check Number 046820 046820 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. Totals Check Number 046820 Check Number 046821 046821 JHESWICK, GAR. B. Tot .Is Check Numb r 046821 Check Number 046822 046822 CORNICK, JAMES L. Totals Check Number 046822 Check Number 046823 046823 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C. Totals Check Number 046823 Check Number 046824 Check Date 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 Check Amount 429.88 429.88 746.27 746.27 1,121.46 1,121.46 321.37 321.37 1,519.16 1,519.16 1,394.96 1,394.96 1,297.04 1,297.04 046824 ERICKSON. KURT R Totals Check Number 046824 17-NOV-99 1.290.96 1.290.96 Check Number 046825 046825 FARNIOK, CCRREY L 17-NOV-99 1.434.43 r 17 Nov 1999 Ned 10:33 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046625 Totals Check Number 046825 Check Number 046026 046826 FISCHENICH* DAN T. Totals Check Number 046826 Check Number 046827 046827 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K Totals Check Number 046627 Check Number 046028 046828 JOHNSON, JEFFREY Totals Check Number 046828 Check Number 046029 046829 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 046829 Check Number 046830 046830 MAOSON. ADRIENNE M. Totals Check Number 046830 Check Number 046031 046831 MCNALLY. STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 046831 Check Number 046832 046832 MCNICHOLS. DAVID L. Totals Check Humber 046832 Check Number 046633 046833 MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES Check Date 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 Page 3 Check Amount 1.434.43 1,151.21 1,151.21 1,136.49 1,136.49 386.68 386.68 1,367.81 1,367.81 504.27 504.27 1,117.96 1,117.96 591.78 591.78 1,538.09 t 17 Nov 1999 Wed 10:33 AM Chec)c Number Employee Name Check Number 046813 Totals Check Number 046833 Check Number 046834 046834 PERSELL, WILLIAM R. Totals Check Number 046834 Check Number 046835 046835 SCHOENHOFF* JOHN B. Totals Check Number 046835 Check Number J46836 046836 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F. Totals Check Number 046836 Check Number 046837 046837 TOMCZYE, MARK W. Totila Check Number 046837 Check Number 043838 04«838 WITTKS, ANTHONY A. Totals Check Number 046836 Check Number 046839 046839 HOECKST, ROBYN A. Totals Check Number 046839 Check Number 04634C 046840 JENSEN, CHRISTOPHER E. Totals Check Number 046640 Check Number 046841 C46841 BOTTENBERG, WENDY C. Totals Check Number 046841 Check Register City of Orono Page 4 Check Date 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17.NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 Check Amount 1,538.09 442.67 442.67 1,279.61 1,279.61 315.20 315.20 1,284.62 1,284.62 305.15 305.15 572.24 572.24 250.12 250.12 974.89 974.89 r- 17 Ncv 1999 Wed ^0:33 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046841 Check Number 046842 046842 DAVIS, MARK L. Totals Check Number 046842 Check Number 046843 046843 GAFFRON, MICHAEL P. Totals Check Number 046843 Check Number 046844 046844 GAPPA, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 046844 Check Number 046845 046045 MEYER, WILLIAM C. Totals Check Number 046845 Check Number 046846 046846 OMAN, LYLE E. Totals Check Number 046846 Check Number 046847 046847 PENCE, CHRISTOPHER M. Totals Check Number 046847 Check Number 046848 046949 WEINBERGER, PAUL E. Totals Check Number 046848 Check Number 046849 045549 BRINKHAUS, JOHN F. Totals Check Number 046849 Check Date 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 Po^e 5 Check Amount 1,068.47 1,068.47 1.158.59 1.168.59 1,569.51 1,569.51 383.44 383.44 315.34 315.34 782.02 782.02 1,064.02 1,064.02 1,121.74 1,121.74 i 17 Vov 1999 Wed 10:33 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check NuirJser 046850 0468S0 DEBAERE* DONALD L. Totals Check Number 046850 Check Number 046851 046851 GREGORY, JAMES D. Totals Check Number 046851 Check Number 046852 046852 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 0468d* Check Number 046853 046853 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G. Totals Check Number 046853 Check Number 046854 046854 OBRIEN, RANDY L. Totals Check Number 046854 Check Number 046855 046855 PALMER, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 046855 Check Numoer 046856 046856 RATHBUN, BARRY J. Totals Check Number 046856 Check Number 046857 046857 SKREEN, DALE S. Totals Check Number 046857 Check Number 046858 046658 ABRAHAMSON, FRED W Check Date 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-Nov-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 Page 6 Check Amount 887.83 887.83 591.57 591.57 848.15 848.15 620.63 610.63 224.70 224.78 645.64 645.64 1,111.05 1,111.05 642.99 642.99 278.46 i 17 Nov 1999 Wed 10:33 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046858 Totals Check Number 046858 Check Number 046859 046859 E>OCKEN, THOMAS W. Totals Check Number 046059 Check Number 046060 046860 R0SS« JOHN A. Totals Check Number 046860 Check Number 046861 046861 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD E Totals Check Number 046861 Grand Total Check Date 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 Page 7 Check Amount 278.46 217.06 217.06 129.05 129.85 1.097.20 1.097.20 43,520.73 1 4 17 Nov 1999 Wed 11:01 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Nur^ -sr 60218 60210 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 17-NOV-99 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Totals Check Number 60218 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Number 60219 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 60219 60219 60219 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Totals Check Number 60219 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Check Number 60220 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 60220 17-NOV-99 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Totals Check Number 60220 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Check Number 60221 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 60221 17-NOV-99 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Totals Check Number 60221 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Check Number 60222 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT 60222 17-NOV-99 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Totals Check Number 60222 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Check Number 60223 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Check Number 60225 60225 PEBSCO/OBRA 17-Nov-99 PEBSCO/OBRA Transaction Amount 7,039.00 7,039.00 3,605.21 3,605.21 8,160.08 15,370.50 275.00 275.00 462.00 462.00 179.51 179.51 60223 17-NOV-99 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 3,180.77 Totals Check Numoer 60223 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 3,180.77 Check Number 60224 ORCHARD TRUST CO.TRUSTEE/CUST 60224 17-NOV-99 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 931.68 60224 17-NOV-99 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 703.00 60224 17-NOV-99 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 277.00 Totals Check Number 60224 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 1,911.68 Page 1 Comments SAVINGS W/H fit TRANSFERRED FICA fit MEDICARE W/H FICA,MEDCR CITY SHARE FEDERAL WITHHOLDING DEFERRED COMP W/K UNION DUES WH SKREEN 110010755723 STATE TAX W/H DEFCOMP-98995-01 D180 DEF COMP DEF COMP 54.78 OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H 17 Nov 1999 Wed 11:01 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 6022S PEBSCO/OBRA Totals Check Number 60225 PEBSCO/OBRA Check Number 60226 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 60226 17-NOV-99 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS Totals Check Number 60226 PEUSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS Check Number 60227 PERA 60227 60227 17-NOV-99 17-NOV-99 PERA PERA Totals Check Number 60227 PERA Check Number 60228 UNITED WAY 60228 17-NOV-99 UNITED WAY Totals Check Number 60223 UNITED WAY Grand Total Transaction Amount 54.78 2,221.70 2,221.70 4,075.22 5,286.70 9,361.92 31.00 31.00 40,087.86 Page 2 Comments USCM DEFERRED COMP W/H PERA EMPLOYEE W/H PERA CITY SHARE CHARITY DONATIONS W/H d 19 Nov 1999 Pri 12:51 PM Check Number Check Number 60230 Check Register City of Orono Page 1 Date Name 60230 ALBERG WATER SERVICES 19-NOV-99 ALBERG WATER SERVICES Totals Check Number 60230 ALBERG WATER SERVICES Check Number 60231 60231 ALIMED INC IB-Nov 99 Totals Check Number ALIMED INC 60231 ALIMED INC Check Number 60232 60232 AT fii T - 19-NOV-99 AT & T - 60232 AT t T -Totals Check Number 60233 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF AUGIES MOBILE CHEF Check Number 60233 19-NOV-99 Totals Check Number 60233 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF Check Number 60235 BONESTROO ROSEHE U ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE &ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE &ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE fii ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE &ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE fie ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE fil ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE fil ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENS fil ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE fil ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE fil ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE fil ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSEN’S fil ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE fil ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE fil ASSOC. 60235 19-Nov-99 BONESTROO ROSENE fil ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC. 60235 19-NOV-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC. Totals Check Number 60235 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC. Transaction Amount 7.003.20 7.083.20 252.95 252.95 6.42 6.42 20.00 20.00 100.00 2.043.60 173.19 173.19 52.00 672.00 588.00 3.330.50 1,491.05 2,004.79 1,311.70 1.394.34 3.008.50 107.50 145.50 533.50 926.85 404.25 1.492.62 110.25 20.144.13 Comments RFP 1 - PMP RPRS-NAV WTR OFFICE CHAIR REGULATORY FEES, TAXES HOT DOG, HAMBURGER AUG COUNCIL MTGS SAGA HILLS PARK IMP UPDATE ADDRESS MAPS UPDATE ZONING MAPS UPDATE ELEC BASE MAPS FUTURE OR-LL SWR CONNECT ENG - AUG APPLIC DICKEY PK-ARCHAEOLOGICAL DRAINAGE - LL GOLF DOME NAV PARK IMP NAV WTR PLANT REHAB 0/99 EDGEWOOD HILLS SWR 0/99 ORONO ORCHARD SWR 8/99 HEAD SEWER 8/99 ELECTRONIC MAPPING 0/99 ELECTRONIC MAPPING 0/99 TH12/STUBBS BY RD CLOSURE EAST LL SAN SWR 0/99 POTENTIAL EXPANSION SITE DRAINAGE-LONG LAKE BLVD 19 Nov 1999 Fri 12:51 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60236 60236 BORIS, SCOTT 19-Nov-99 BORIS, SCOTT Totals Check Number 60236 BORIS, SCOTT Check Number 60237 BRAUN INTERTEC 60237 60237 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 BRAUN INTERTEC BRAUN INTERTEC Totals Check Number 60237 BRAUN INTERTEC Check Number 60238 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS INC. 60238 19-NOV-99 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS INC Totals Check Number 60238 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS INC Check Number 60239 CHESWICK, GARY 60239 18-Nov-99 CHESWICK, GARY Totals Check Number 60239 CHESWICK, GARY Check Number 60240 COFFEE MILL 60240 60240 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 COFFEE MILL COFFEE MILL Totals Check Number 60240 COFFEE MILL Check Number 60241 COLE PUBLICATIONS 60241 19-NOV-99 COLE PUBLICATIONS Totals Check Number 60241 COLE PUBLICATIONS Check Number 60242 DCA 60242 ie-Nov-99 DCA Totals Check Number 60242 DCA Check Number 60243 DEMBOUSKI, JAY 60243 19-NOV-99 DEMBOUSKI, JAY Totals Check Number 60243 DEMBOUSKI, JAY Transaction Amount 22.14 22.14 428.00 160.00 588.00 12,554.25 12,554.25 13.00 13.00 141.00 283.00 424.00 136.01 136.01 159.60 159.60 21.09 21.09 Page 2 Comments MEALS-TRAINING WATER TESTING WATER TESTING RFP 1-ST BY RD CUL-DE-SAC MEA:. - CHIEFS MEETING COFFEE, CREAM, SUGAR COFFEE, CREAM, SUGAR DIRECTORY SPENDING PLAN ADM 10/99 LUNCH-1ST RESPONDER TRNG 1 19 Nov 1999 Pri 12:51 PM Check Number Check Register City of Orono Date Name Transaction Amount Comments Page 3 Check Number 60244 60244 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP 10-Nov-99 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP Totals Check Number 60244 DEPT OF ACM - INTERTECH GROUP 208.79 200.79 PHONE CHARGES Check Number 60245 EARL F. ANDERSON & ASSOC. 60243 ia-Nov-99 Totals Check Number EARL F. A2IDERS0N & ASSOC 60245 EARL F. ANDERSON & ASSOC 123.84 123.84 PAINT STRIPER Check Number 60246 ELDREDGE TRADING, INC 60246 19-NOV-99 Tota.s Check Number ELDREDGE TRADING. INC 60246 ELDREDGE TRADING, INC 19.25 19.25 GOLF SHIRT Check Number 60247 ENGINEERING CONTACTS 60247 19-N0V-99 Totals Check *’amber ENGINEERING COirTACTS 60247 ENGINEERING COirPACTS 68.00 60.00 SCAN TO PLOT Check Number 60248 ENGINEERING RF.PRO SYSTEMS 602td 19-NOV-99 Totals Check Number ENGINEERING REFRO SYSTEMS 60240 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS 36.74 36.74 COPIES 24 X 36 Check Number 60249 ESS BROTHERS & SONS 60249 60249 60249 18- NOV-99 10-NOV-99 19- NOV-99 Totals Check Number ESS BROTHERS & SONS ESS BROTHERS & SONS ESS BROTHERS i SONS 60249 ESS BROTHERS i SONS 472.06 277.97 52.07 003.70 MANHOLE COVERS RINGS. GLUE LIQ LICENSES Check Number 60250 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO. INC. 60250 60250 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 Totals Check Number EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO. INC EULL'S MAIUFACTURING CO. INC 60250 EULL*S MANTI FACTOR ING CO. INC 170.76 241.33 420.09 MANHOLE RINGS - I&I MANHOLE RINGS - I6I Check Number 60251 EXPRESS MESSENGER 60251 19-NOV-99 Totals Check Number EXPRESS MESSENGER 60251 EXPRESS MESSENGER 27.30 27.3C DEL TO N CHADWICK 19 Nov 19:?9 Fri 12:51 I'M Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60252 60252 60252 GALL'S INC. 10-No\-99 GALL'S INC 18-Nov-99 GALL'S INC Totals Check Number 60252 GALL'S INC Check Number 60253 GB CAPITAL 60253 18-NOV-99 GE CAPITAL Totals Check Number 60253 GE CAPITAL Check Number 60256 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE 60256 60256 18- NOV-99 19- NOV-99 HENl.'EPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHA*NGE HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHA.NGE Totals Check Number 60256 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE Check Nurnber 60257 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 60257 18-Nov-99 HEriNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Totals Check Number 60257 HEN^NEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Check Number 60258 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SRV 60258 lB-Nov-99 HEN’NEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SRV Transaction Amount 212.98 83.94 296.92 5,474.31 5,474.31 45.74 277.65 323.39 50.00 50.00 54.00 Page 4 Comments BIKE JACKET - FARNIOK TURTLNECK, GLOVES-DEMBOUS NETWORK SERVER - HP LC3 Check Number 60255 GENUINE PARTS CO. 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.9.21 CONNECTOR 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.3.95 CONNECTOR 60255 18-NOV-99 Gt:NU:'»=‘oftKT.S GO.19.71 TEMINALS, TESTER 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.1.55 SCREWS 60255 16-NOV-99 GENUI.NE PARTS CO.1.57 TUBING 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.9.19 WIRE, CONNECTR 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARIS CO.1.45 MISC SUPPLIES 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.4.46 AIR FILTER 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.37.06 WIPER BLADE, OIL 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.16.21 SOCKET, PLUG 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.13.08 PLUG, LENS 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.71.82 BRUSH, SOAP, 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.56.2'SWITCH 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.9.59 STARTER 60255 18-NOV-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.72.84 SWITCH, STARTER, 60255 18-NOV-99 GEinJINE PARTS CO.4.99 SOAPSTON 60255 18-NOV-99 GEIiUINE PARTS CO.21.28 FOAM Totals Check Number 60255 GENUINE PARTS CO.354.23 GRASS SEED GRASS SEED PERMIT - MAIN BREAK TRAFFIC TICKETS 19 Nov 1999 Fri 12:51 PM Check Number Check Number 60258 Check Register City of Orono Page 5 Date Name 60258 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SRV 18-Nov-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SRV Totals Check Number 60258 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SRV Check Number 60260 60260 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 18-Nov-99 INTERSTATE BATTERIES Totals Check Number 60260 INTERSTATE BATTERIES Check Number 60261 J a R REFRIGERATION 60261 18-NOV-99 J B R REFRIGERATION Totals Check Number 60261 J B R REFRIGERATION Check Number 60262 KRCGNESS, STEPHEN M L NOREEN J 60262 19-NOV-99 KROGNESS, STEPHEN M k NOREEN J Totals Check Number 60262 KROGNESS, STEPHEN V k NOREEN J Check N-mter 60263 LMCIT 60233 19-NOV-99 LMCIT Totals Check Number 60263 LMCIT Check Number 60264 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 60264 19-NOV-99 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 60264 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Transaction Amount 54.00 108.00 Comments TRAFFIC TICK^ETS Check Number 60259 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 60259 19-NOV-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 4.538.32 LEGAL - SEPT APPLIC 60259 19-NOV-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 187.00 ADULT USE ORDINANCE 60259 19-NOV-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 20.00 NELSON DRIVEWAY EASEMENT 60259 19-NOV-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 228.00 KNOLLENBERG MATTER 60259 19-NOV-99 h JSHAW k CULBERTSON 73.62 SAGA HILLS PARK 60259 19-NOV-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 96.00 GOETTEN-SPECIAL LOT COMB 60259 19-NOV-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 551.10 NATIONAL GUARD DTY-BORIS 60259 19-NOV-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 310.00 ADULT USE ORDINANCE 60239 19-NOV-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1,100.00 LEGAL SERVICE SEPT Totals Check Number 60259 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 7,104.04 277.81 277.81 BATTERY GENERATORS 87.50 87.50 FURNACE REPAIRS 380.00 380.00 EASEMENT-SB BY CUL-DE-SAC 10.597.29 10.597.29 WOODriILL CC ROAD -FINAL 10.13 10.13 HITCH FOR LEAF BLOWER 19 Nov 1999 Check Register Page 6 Frl 12:51 FH City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 60265 MCLEODUSA INC 60265 19-Nov-99 MCLEODUSA INC 100.00 PHONE LINE FOR EOC Totals Check Number 60265 MCLEODUSA INC 100.00 Check Number 60266 MOS MATRX MEDICAL INC 60266 18-NOV-99 KDS MATRX MEDICAL INC 316.61 FIRST AID SUPPLIES Totals Check Number 60266 KDS MATRX MEDICAL INC 316.61 Check Number 6026S MEDICA CHOICE 60268 18-NOV-99 MEDICA CHOICE 357.11 DECEMBER HEA1.TH INS 60268 18-NOV-99 MEDICA CHOICE 257.11 DECEMBER HEALTH INS 60268 18-Nov 99 MEDICA CHOICE 2.856.86 DECEMBER HEALTH INS 60268 18-Nov-99 MEDICA CHOICE 535.68 DECEMBER HEALTH INS 60268 18-NOV-99 MEDICA CHOICE 178.55 DECEMBER HEALTH INS 60268 18-NOV-99 MEDICA CHOICE 1.249.86 DECEMBER HEALTH INS 60268 18-NOV-99 MEDICA CHOICE 178.56 DECEMBER HEALTH INS 60269 18-NOV-99 MEDICA CHOICE 178.55 DECEMBER HEALTH INS 60268 18-NOV-99 MEDICA CHOICE 720.07 DECEMBER HEALTH INS 60268 lB-Nov-99 MEDICA CHOICE 7,143.00 DECEMBER HEALTH INS 60268 19-NOV-99 MEDICA CHOICE 178.55 DECEMBER HEALTH INS 60268 19-NOV-99 MEDICA CHOICE 357.11 DECEMBER HEALTH INS 60268 19-NOV-99 MEDICA CHOICE 206.23 DECEMBER HEALTH INS 6026T 19-NOV-99 MEDICA CHOICE 1.056.16 DECEMBER HEALTH INS Totals Check Number 60268 MEDICA CHOICE 15,553.40 1 Check Number 60269 MET COUNCIL F.N^/IRONMENTAL SVCS 60269 19-NOV-99 MET COUNCIL Eir/IRONMENTAL SVCS 27,943.11 SEWER SERVICE 12/99 60269 19-NOV-99 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMErrTAL SVCS -1.355.00 PR YR COST ALLOC 12/99 Totals Check Number 6026 9 MET COUNCIL EN'/IRONMENTAL SVCS 26.588.11 Check Number 60270 MID CON SYSTEMS 60270 19-NOV-99 MID CON SYSTEMS 81.92 ANTI STATIC TOWELS Totals Check Number 60270 MID CON SYSTEMS 81.92 Check NuT±>er 60271 MIDWEST ASPHALT 60271 18-NOV-99 MIDWEST ASPHALT 174.72 MANHOLE I 6 I 60271 18-NOV-99 MIDWEST ASPHALT 133.44 SPENDING ACCT 11/5/99 19 Nov 1999 Fri 12:51 PM Check Number Check Number 60271 Date Name Check Register City of Orono 60271 MIDWEST ASPHALT 10-Nov-99 MIDWEST ASPHALT Totals Check Nurrber 60271 MIDWEST ASPHALT Transaction Amount 133.44 441.60 Page 7 Conaments SPENDING ACCT 11/19/99 Check Number 60272 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 60272 19-NOV-99 Totals Check Number MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 60272 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 27.00 27.00 ACETYLENE, OXYGEN Check Number 60273 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 60273 602-3 602^3 60273 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 l.‘-Nov-99 19-NOV-99 Totals Check Number MN DFPT OF REVENUE MN DEPT OF REVENUE MN DEPT OF REVENUE MN DEPT OF REVENUE 6C273 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 10.00 10.00 519.00 007.00 1,346.00 SALES TAX 10/99 SALES TAX 10/99 SALES TAX 10/99 SALES TAX 10/99 Check Number 60274 MN STATE POLICE EQUIPMENT 60274 10-NOV-99 Totals Check Number MN STATE POLICE EQUIPMErn* 60274 MN STATE POLICE EQUIPMENT 192.72 192.72 COLT AR15 MAGAZINES Check Number 60275 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE 60IT5 19-NOV-99 Totals Check Number MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE 60275 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE 49.50 49.50 COFFEE FOR RESALE Check Number 60276 MTI DIST CO. 60276 602*"6 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 Totals C.ieck Number MTI DIST CO. MTI DIST CO. 60276 MTI DIST CL. 420.30 127.10 292.90 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYS CREDIT FOR RETURN Check Number 60279 NAVARRE HARDWARE 60279 60279 60279 60273 60279 60279 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19 Nov-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE NAVARRE HARDWARE H.ARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE 13.94 16.04 0.00 7.51 13.02 15.73 BULK NUTS RECEPTICLE EYE BOLT BULK NUTS MOP PAINT, CAULK GUN 19 Nov 1999 Check Register Page Fri 12:51 PM City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 60279 NAVARRE HARDWARE 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 2.97 HOSE E.ND 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 7.97 MASON JAR 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 15.61 SPRK PLUGS, MTR TUNE UP 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 3.39 WD 40 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 9.30 COUPLING.BUSHING, NPL 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 7.01 COOLING SYS SEALER 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 4.57 16" HANDLE 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 6.38 BATTERIES 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 18.06 MISC SUPPLIES 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 1.25 MISC SUPPLIES 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 14.44 MORTAR MIX 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 18.89 E.NAMEL. BRUSH, DST MSK 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 6.79 PAINT MARKER 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11.36 TOILET CKN. AIR CHUCK. TP 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 2.48 COUPLING. HOSE CLAMP 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 2.65 COUPLER 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 10.62 ENAMEL. BRUSH 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 12.76 MARKING PAINT 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 27.17 SPRAY i-.*.iNT. DUCT TAPE 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 26.04 CAULK. F- M SEAL. INSULAT 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 23.06 CHISEL. Ml wR MIX 60279 19-NOV-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 15.94 FOAM SEAL Totals Check Number 60279 NAVARRE HARDWARE 317.43 Check Number 60280 NORTH STAR TURF 60280 19-NOV-99 NORTH STAR TURF 16.79 WIRE STUD Totals Check Number 60200 NORTH STAR TURF 16.79 Check Number 60281 NSP 60281 19-NOV-99 NSP 141.04 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60281 19-NOV-99 NSP 50.10 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60281 19-NOV-99 NSP 135.32 ELECTRICAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 60291 NSP 326.46 Check Number 60203 OFFICE DEPOT 60203 19-Nov-99 OFFICE DEPOT 70.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 60283 19-NOV-99 OFFICE DEPOT 05.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 60293 19-Nov-99 OFFICE DEPOT 33.01 CD-R DISKS - Y2K 60283 19-NOV-99 OFFICE DEPOT 43.60 OFFICE SUPPPLIES 60283 19-NOV-99 OFFICE DEPOT 53.30 OFFICE SUPPPLIES 19 Nov 1999 Pri 12:51 PM Ctizk Register City of Or©no Check Number Date Name Check Number 60283 60263 60283 60283 60283 60283 60263 60263 60293 60283 60283 60283 60283 OFFICE 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 19-Nov-99 DEPOT OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT Totals Check Number 60283 OFFICE DEPOT Check Number 60284 OLSON, RON 60284 18-Nov-99 OLSON, RON Totals Check Number 60284 OLSON, RON Check Number 60285 PENCE, CHRIS 60285 18-NOV-99 PENCE. CHRIS Totals Check Number 60285 PENCE, CHRIS Check Number 60266 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR 60286 60286 19-Nov-99 19-NOV-99 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIa PERRYS TRUCK REPAI- Totals Check Number 60286 PERRYS TRUCK REPAI?. Check Number 60287 PERSONNEL DECISIONS 60287 19-NOV-99 PERSONNEL DECISICN5 Totals Check Number 60287 PERSONNEL DECISIONS Check Number 60288 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. 60288 60288 19-NOV-99 19-NOV-99 POWERCLEAN COMPA.Vr IN*: POWERCLEAN COMPAV.' Totals Check Number 60288 powerclean compav' Check Number 60289 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. Transaction Amount 26.60 26.60 19.60 19.60 71.36 30.89 102.25 40.00 40.00 574.03 469.67 1.043.70 Page 9 Comments 18.45 CD-R LABELS -Y2K 5.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 9.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES -5.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES -36.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES -47.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 57.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 28.56 397.31 POSTAL VERIFICATION HEAD CLEANING TAPE MILEAGE-COURT FEE TOW-MERCURY CMF-232 TOW - SQD 184 NEW POSITION PROFILE UPHOLSTERY CLEANING UPHOLSTERY CiXANING 19 Nov 1999 Fri 12:51 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60289 60289 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 18-NOV-99 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO Totals Check Number 60289 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO Check Number 60290 RC IDENTIFICATIONS 60290 18-Nov-99 RC IDENTIFICATIONS Totals Check Number 60290 RC IDENTIFICATIONS Check Number 60291 RICKS SUPERVALUE 60291 19-NOV-99 RICKS SUPERVALUE Totals Check Number 60291 RICKS SUPERVALUE Check Number 60292 SCHWABB INC. Check Number 60294 60294 STAR TRIBUNE 19-Nov-99 STAR TRIBUNE Totals Check Number 60294 STAR TRIBUNE Check Number 60295 STEFFF.VHAGEN, RON 60295 19-Nov-99 STEFFENHAGEN, RON Totals Check Nu?5ber 6C295 STEFFENHAGEN, RON Check Number 60296 TEMACA LAWN SPRINKLERS. INC 60296 19-NOV-99 TEMACA LAWN SPRINKLERS, INC Transaction Amount 1,000.00 1,000.00 3.73 3.73 12.63 12.63 221.00 221.00 207.80 207.80 Page 10 Comments IN SQD CAMERA INSTAL ID CARD - KIRBY SUPPLIES 60292 18-NOV-99 SCHWABB INC.48.47 PRE INK STAMPS 60292 18-NOV-99 SCHWABB INC.128.69 PRE INK STAMPS 60292 18-NOV-99 SCHWABB INC.44.72 RUBBER STAMP Dll Totals Check Number 60292 SCHWABB INC.221.88 Check Number 60293 SNYDER DRUG STORES 60293 19-NOV-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 33.62 FILM, BATTERY 60293 19-NOV-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 5.11 FILM PROCESSING 60293 19-NOV-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 4.31 BAL ON ACCT 60293 19-NOV-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 4.32 MISC SUPPLIES Totals Check Number 60293 SNYDER DRUG STORES 47.36 AMP ADV - CSO JURY DUTY-MILEAGE REIM 114.41 RPR 5PRNKLRS-3480 LIVINGS 19 Nov 1999 Fri 12:51 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 11 Check Number Date Name Check Number 60296 TEMACA UtWN SPRINKLERS. INC Totals Check Number 60296 TEMACA LAWN SPRI»IKLERS. INC Check Number 60297 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO Totals Check Number 60302 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE Check NurrJDer 60303 WIDMER INC 60303 19-NOV-99 WIDMER INC Transaction Amount Comments 114.41 60297 18-NOV-99 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 432.00 TEMP HELP-V/K END 11/14/99 60297 19-NOV-99 TEM PORARIES-TO-GO 540.00 TEMP HELP-WK END 11/7/99 Totals Check Number 60297 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 972.00 Check Number 60290 TOMCHECK.LARRY 60298 19-NOV-99 TOMCHECK. LARRY 34.50 PARKING-USE OF FRCE TRNG 60298 19-NOV-99 TOMCHECK. LARRY 12.51 MEALS-UUSE OF FRCE TRNG 60298 I9-NOV-99 TOMCHECK. LARRY 110.00 TR.NG MATERAIL-USE OF FRCE Totals Check Number 60298 TOMCHECK. LARRY 157.01 Check Number 60299 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 60299 19-NOV-99 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 149.95 BOOTS - SCHOENHOFF 60299 19-NOV-99 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 80.91 SHIRTS - TOMCZYK 60299 19-NOV-99 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 32.62 SHIRT - DJ GOMAN Totals Check Numfc-r 60299 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 263.48 Check Number 60300 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 60300 19-NOV-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 114.56 MODEM LINE-LOGIS 60300 I9-NOV-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 79.00 COM LINE - WT TO PW Totals Check Number 60300 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 193.56 Check Number 60301 HARMING LITES OF HN 60301 19-NOV-99 WARNING LITES OF KN 509.07 PORT STOP SIGNS - Y2K Totals Check Number 60301 WARNING LITES OF Kll 509.07 Check Number 60302 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 60302 10-NOV-99 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 12.00 TIRE REPAIR 60302 10-NOV-99 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 12.00 TIRE REPAIR 60302 10-NOV-99 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 12.00 TIRE REPAIR 36.00 i 76.570.28 RFP 83-ORONO ORCH SAN SWR 19 Nov 1999 Fri 12:51 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 12 Check Number Name Check Number Date 60303 WIDMER INC Totals Check Number 60303 WIDMER INC Check Number 60304 WILLIAMS TOWING 60304 19-NOV-95 WILLIAMS TOWING Totals Check Number 60304 WILLIAMS TOWING Check Number 60305 YOCUM OIL CO INC. Grand Total Transaction Amount Comments 76,570.20 70.00 70.00 TOW - 89 CHEV VAN 60305 19-NOV-99 YOCUM OIL CO INC.149.23 FUEL OIL 60305 19-NOV-99 YOCUM OIL CO INC.163.i:FUEL OIL Totals Check Number 60305 YOCUM OIL CO INC.312.43 196,389.54 1 council meetinq NOV 2 2 1999 INFORMATION CIIYUKOHONQ ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING I • COl INCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 1999 CnYUfOHONU OF i i i Mediacom COl IWCIL MEETING NOV 2 2 1999 N^cduKom LLt,. y UHOlMU 1504 2nd Street S.E. -"lone: 50r> 8 Ji-J >5o Waseca. MN 56093 = \.X: '5C" 835-4 V, November 16,1999 • J •h' 1 S I9Q0 Citv of Orono Mayor Gabriel Jabbour PO Box 66 Cry stal Bay, MN 55323*0066 ••* ^ • • s3 Dear Mayor Gabriel Jabbour and City Council Members, We are writing to inform you that the sale ofTriax to Mediacom is now complete. The change is an exciting one for us as we begin our reinvestment in your cable system, assuring that we will be in a position to succeed in a grow ing competitive market. The transition to the Mediacom operation has been occurring for several months, and the change should be a smooth one for our customers. A full rollout of the Mediacom identity will begin soon as we convert some of our internal operations that will position us to continue our customer serx ’icc improvements. An immediate personnel change has occurred in the management of our Metro systems. Mr. Rick Finch will no longer be serving as Mediacom*s Manager of the Metro Area. We wish Mr.Finch continued success as his career in this industry' takes another step forward. We are currently working to identify a replacement and keep our commitment to providing strong and effective management as our Metro area properties are upgraded and new serv ices are introduced. Until the new candidate is selected, please feel free to contact Tom Bordwell, Manager of Government Rela.'ions, at 440-9680 with any concerns or questions vou mav have. Mediacom is very much committed to completing our rebuild plans for your community, and equaliy excited about continuing the process this operation has made in the area of customer service. Our employees and management are eager to prove and demonstrate the pride we have in delivering the highest level of service to our customers to be successful now and in the future. Thank you, and please feel free to call us with your questions and concerns. Ric Hanson Director of Operations Mediacom Tom Bordwell Manager of Government Relations Mediacom _J Minutes of Watercraft licensing & public safety monies task force November 17,1999,0900hours Water Patrol Headquarters ■?Z-r:\:2D :;J-; 1 9 1999 Qt I t Ur uriONO Attendees: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Woody I.ove, Chief Harlan Johnson, K'm Elverum MN DNR, Lt. Ken Schilling Hennepin Sheriff s Water Patrol. 1 . The topic of supplemental money for Lake Minnetonka public safety was discussed. The group agreed that the need exists to find additional funding to increase enforcement efforts on Lake Minnetonka for the Sheriffs Water Patrol 2. Discussions were started on how, who and where this funding would come from. Mayor Jabbour and Mayor love will obtain some financial information to bring to the next meeting for discussion. 3. The LMCD and WBLCD contracting and enforcement funding was brought up. Questions about fine money. Attorney fees. Witness fees, Save the Lake and the financial report were raised and Mayor Jabbour indicated he would seek this information for the next meeting. 4. The group agreed to seek the addition of two more members. Lili Mc.Millan Orono Representative LMCD and Tom Gilman Excelsior Representative LMCD/ Excelsior city council member. They will be invited by letter. 5. The licensing issue was discussed. Many questions were raised. Everx one agreed that this issue needs to be further addressed. What is the best approach to take? Pilot program vs. statewide. Voluntary vs. Mandatory and at what level? How would it be implemented? Grandfathering. Magic date or program similar to the current snowmobile operator licensing programs. 6. Other questions brought up included: can the licensing issue be added as an endorsement on a driver’s license similar to the snowmobile endorsement? Can boating violations appear on a D.L. or a database that can be accessed by Law Enforcement, Courts, Insurance companies, etc? Maybe a place to hit repeat violators would be insurance rates. 7. Everyone agreed that at a minimum basic information needs to be rela> ed to boat owners and operators. Even though Minnesota statistics are among the best in the nation maybe the public would be able to enjoy the boating experience more if everyone was better educated on basics of boating so they could operate properly and have more courtesy. 8. All agreed that this is a start but more discussion and meetings are needed. The next meeting will be held on Tuesday December 21,1999 at 0900 hours at Water Patrol. NOTE Please RSVP if you are unable to attend. Thank You, Lt. Ken Schilling James Ogland S2S Femdale Road N Wayzata, Minnesota SS391 COUNCIL MBETiNG NOV 2 2 1999 ClfY UHOHONU NOV 1 2 1999 Mayor Gabriel Jabbour City of Orono 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono, NW 55356 Gi I T Ur UnO(\'0 RE: Big Island dock permit request#2549 at 220 Big Island. 1 think it sets a bad precedent to issue a dock permit for private use on pubic property. In almost all situations most propert^wners, if they want lake access, are required to pur ­ chase a lake property to do so. I do reel that it is the responsiblity of the City to give them access even if the property is land-locked. It makes little difference if it is on an island, land based owners are not given this right, they must purchase their own lake shore. I know that there are previous permits issued, and they should be gra^^he^ in, but now is the time to put a stop to non-lakeshore property owners to get free access to the lake. Adjacent neighbors should not be expected to have inland owners using a fire lane for their private use. These lake accesses were not intended for this use. If you allow this, then what is next? sno^vmobile route, winter car driving off the ice. I will not be able to attend the council meeting as will be out of the state. I own the lot at 200 Big Island Sincerely, James Ogland cc: Paul Weinberger 4 BOARD MEMBERS Douglas E. Babcock Chair, Tonka Bay Bert Foster Vice Chair. Deephaven Eugene Partyka Secretary. Minnetrista Craig Nelson Treasurer, Spring Park Andrea Ahrens Mound Bob Ambrose Wayzata Kent Dahien Minnetonka Beach Craig Eggers Victoria Tom Oilman Excelsior Greg Kitchak Minrtetonka Uli McMillan Orono Robert Rascop Shorewooo Herb J. Suerth Woodland Sheldon Wert Qreertwood CnUNCJL MEETING NOV 2 2 IW LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATIOM.DieJPMCT 18338 MINNETONKA BLVO. • OEEPHAVEN. MINNESOTA 55391 • TELEPHONE 612/745 0789 • FAX 612/745-9085 Gregory S. Nybeck. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Novembers, 1999 TO: FROM: LMCD Member Cities Greg Nybeck, Executive Director SUBJECT: Update on Appointment of Board Members At the 10/13/99 Regular Board Meeting, the nominating committee for 2000 Board Officers recommended the Board change the date in which Board appointments from LMCD member cities are effective. Currently, Board appointments are effective at the second meeting in October. The nominating committee recommended they become effective sometime after the 1** of January to be more consistent with the appointment schedules of LMCD member cities. The LMCD Board decided to change the date in which Board appointments become effective to the first meeting in February. LMCD staff has prepared an attendance sheet for Board members in 1998 and 1999. You might want to circulate this attendance sheet to your city council. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this matter! Rtcycltd Contani V. Pom Ootmtrym Watt* Web Page Address: http://www.winlemel.com/-lmcd/ E-mail Address: lmcdOwintemet.com f *■ LMCD BOARD ATTENDANCE RECORD 1998 & 1! iilSIiU.X** i ' - X Andrea Ahrens Bob Ambrose Doug Babcock Kent Dahlen Craig Eggers Bert Foster Tom Gilman Gr^ Kitchak Lili McMillan Craig Nelson Gene Party ka Bob Rascop Herb Suerth Sheldon Wert 79% 53% 89% 63% 62% 89% 63% 82% 89% 74% 89% 74% 68% 63% Andrea Ahrens Bob Ambrose Doug Babcock Kent Dahlen Craig Eggers Bert Foster Tom Gilman Greg Kitchak Lili McMillan Craig Nelson Gene Partyka Bob Rascop Herb Suerth Sheldon Wert 47% 35% 88% 76% 65% 82% 76% 94% 88% 71 % 88% 65% 71 % 53% Cm -• . •mbetinq ■ ^ toco^ ^ ^ (^11 r “'■OHOto LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18338 Minnetonka Blvd. Cii v.. .0 Deephaven, MN SS391 745-0789 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NEWSLETTER Gregory S. Nybeck November 10,1999 Eyntics Management: The 1999 EWM harvesting season commenced on 6/14/99 and continued through 8/12/99. During the season, 614 acres of milfoil and other aquatic plants were harvested, which included 78.5 acres of second cuts in Carmans Bay, Phelps Bay, Grays Bay, and St. Albans Bay. Har\ ^-iting priorities, which were consistent with past y^, were based upon impediment to public u^at navigation on the open water, with higher priority given to areas of the lake that were matted. Feel free to call the office if you would like a copy of the 1999 EWM Final Harvesting Report. Staff began working with Fleet Engineer Marsh Gabriel on fall maintenance projects once the equipment w'as pulled from the lake in August. A variety of maintenance projects were completed this fall. This includes the conversion of the hydraulic fluid in the remaining two harvesters to bio-degradable, the installation of plastic liners on the storage conveyors of the remaining two harvesters, the conversion of a second harvester so that it has transporting capabilities, routine winterizing, and a variety of miscellaneous repairs. At its 9/22/99 Regular meeting, the LMCD Board established an EWM Harvesting Program Task Force to evaluate the program and to make recommendations back to the Board on possible improvements that could be made. This Task Force has met on 10/21/99 and 1 1/6/99. We will keep you informed on the recommendations of this Task Force. During tlie month of September, the LMCD worked with Carmichael Lynch on a pro bono basis to increase the public awareness in preventing the spread of zebra mussels into Lake Minnetonka. A four-week billboard campaign, targeted at various Lake Minnetonka locations, was initiated during the month. Continuation of the zebra mussel awareness campaign is planned for 2( Propose^ change relating to boat storage density and multiple dock facdltHSi This past summer, the LMCD Board considered an ordinance amendment that would amend existing Code relating to boat storage density and multiple dock facilities for new developments a.nd re-developments on Lake Minnetonka. Three areas of the exisUng Code were being addressed in this draft Code amendment. They included: 1) to minimize the impact of multiple dock facilities, that utilize an outlot, on nearby properties, 2) to change the mechanism for measuring the amount of shoreline to credit when it is a meandering line, and 3) to change the General Rule from 1:50’ to 1:100 ’. In my last Newsletter, 1 indicated I would keep you informed on the status of it. 1999 bake MiRRetoRka SkopeliRe Boat GoaRt 1999 Lake Minnetonka Shoreline Storage Count INTRODUCTION The Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka, adopted in December of 1991. has established Lake Use Objectives for the lake. Beginning in 1992, and every other year thereafter, one of these objectives is to measure watercraft density and the distribution of beached and rafting watercraft on Lake Minnetonka. At the August 12,1998 Regular Board Meeting, the Board reviewed the 1998 data presented to them. Because the 1998 Shoreline Storage Count ruvealed a 22% deaease in the number of watercraft stored on Lake Minnetonka compared to 1996, the Board directed staff to conduct another survey in 1999 to verify the 1998 data. Three primary objectives were established for the 1999 Shoreline Storage Count. They include: 1. Establish the total number of watercraft stored in 1999. 2. Outline data collected from historical Shoreline Storage Counts. 3. Identify any observable conclusions and trends from the Shoreline Storage data collected. METHODOLOGY To ensure consistency and accuracy in the 1999 Shoreline Storage Count, LMCD staff established parameters in which the storage inventory was to be conducted. Detailed below is a summary of these parameters. 1. Survey ail 125 miles of lakeshore frontage on Mondays through Thursdays, between the hours of 7:30 AM and 12:00 PM. This time has been selected to best represent when observers could count the maximum number of watercraft stored on Lake Minnetonka. Friday was established to be an alternative day when weather conditions were not favorable. 2. The count was to be conducted during the month of June with a completion date of July 4. 3. The watercraft count was to be conducted by LMCD staff from the 18 foot runabout owned by the District. 4. A shoreline storage count worksheet was created to assist in conducting the shoreline storage inventory. Ten classifications of watercraft were established on this worksheet to categorize each watercraft type. These watercraft classifications include: runabout, cruiser, sailboat, pontoon, houseboat, charter boat, fishing boat, personal watercraft, airaaft, and miscellaneous watercraft. Further definition of these watercraft classifications are outlined in Apperxiix A 5. Residences that had docks with 3 boats, 4 boats, and empty slips were also identified in 1999. In this Report, a slip was defined as either a docking structure with three clearly defin^ sides or a boat lift. This data was not collected in 1998. 1 SUMMARY OF THE 199ft SHORELINE STORAGE COUNT The total number of watercraft stored, beached or rafting on Lake Minnetonka for 1999 was 8,797. Appendix B highlights this figure and provides a breakdown, by watercraft classification and bay. Further analysis indicate that 5,499 watercraft were stored at riparian residences and that 3,298 watercraft were stored at multiple dock facilities. Results indicate that over 61 % of the wateraaft counted on Lake Minnetonka were either found In the runabout or cruiser classification. The lowest percent of watercraft stored on the lake were classified in the houseboat, charter boat and aircraft classifications with less than 1 %. Appendix B highlights the 5,499 watercraft stored at riparian residences in 1999. Approximately 65% of the wateraaft stored on riparian shoreline were found to in either the runabout or cruiser classification. Further breakdown of this figure indicates that 47% of the wateraaft inventoried were runabouts and that 18% wore cruisers. The lowest percent of wateraaft stored at riparian residences wore found to bo in the house boat, charter boat, and airaaft classifications, which total loss than 1 %. These percentages are slightly skewed because District staff was unable to distinguish the wateraaft counted, by classification, at riparian residences because of the Mound Commons Docking Program. Further details of this drawback are discussed later in the text. Appendix C highlights the 3.298 wateraaft stored at multiple docks In 1999. Approximately 56% of wateraaft stored at multiple docks wore found to be In either the runabout and cruiser classification. Further breakdown of this figure Indicates that 38% of the wateraaft wore runabouts and that 18% were cruisers. The lowest percentage of wateraaft stored at multiple docks wore houseboat, charter boat, and airaaft classifications, which total less than 1 %. Again, these percentages are slightly skewed because District staff was unable to distinguish the wateraaft counted, by classification, at multiple dock facilities because of the Mound Commons Docking Program. The City of Mound indicated to Distria staff that 538 wateraaft. on eight bays, were located at the Mound Commons Docks In 1999. These bays are highlighted by an (*) in Appendix B and C. Further breakdown of these wateraaft are detailed below: Cooks Bay 96 Phelps Bay 115 Black Lake 67 Emerald Lake 4 Seton Lake 25 Harrisons Bay 154 Jennings Bay 39 West Arm 38m Because this documentation was provided by the City of Mound, ^e Report is accurate with regards to total riparian and multiple do^ wateraaft inventoried in 1999. The drawback is that these 538 wateraaft were not broken down by wateraaft classification by the City of Mound. The end result is that these 538 watercraft are documented In the riparian storage classification count rather than the multiple dock storage classification count Appendix D highlights residences that had docks with 3 boats, 4 boats, and empty slips. In 1999, there were 279 residences that had 3 boats stored at the dock, there were 168 residences that had 4 boats stored at the dock, and there were 409 empty slips. At the residences with 3 and 4 boats, there was no distinction between restricted and unrestricted watercraft SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL SHORELINE COUNTS Appendix E highlights Nstorical shoreline storage counts from 1971 to 1999. Watercraft identified in these historical counts ranged from a low of 5,245 In 1971 to a high of 10,475 in 1996. CONCLUSIONS /TRENDS Based on LMCD staff review of the data collected from the 1999 shoreline survey, the following condusionsArends have been observed: • The data collected in 1999 appears to corroborate the data collected in 1998. • There appears to be a leveling off of personal watercraft (PWC) stored on Lake Minnetonka. The figure of 644 in 1998 compares to 639 in 1999. • There appears to be a decrease in cruisers stored on the lake. The figure of 1,917 in 1998 has decreased to 1,592 In 1999, a 17 % decrease. This could be attributed to the difficulty, at times, in distinguishing between a cruiser and a runabout. This appears to be substantiated with a 14 % increase in 1999 from 1998 In the storage of runabouts. There were 3,269 runabouts inventoried In 1998 compared to 3,788 in 1999. • There appears to be a leveling off of sailboats storcxt on Lake Minnetonka. The figure of 720 in 1998 compares to 719 in 1999. • There appears to be a slight increase in fishing boats stored on Lake Minnetonka. In 1998 there were 732 and In 1999 there were 785, a 7% increase. • There were several residenct s on Lake Minnetonka that had 3 and 4 boats stored at their docks, 447. Future inventories sh<wld distinguish between restricted and unrestricted watercraft at these residences. • There were several residences that had empty slips identified at their docks, 409. Although empty slips have not been factored in past Reports on the total number of boats stored on Lake Minnetonka, it might be valid to include them in future Reports. Watercraft Classification Definitions Appendix A • Runabout- single hull-pointed bow, tri-hull-blunt bow, hull may be partially covered, windshield often visible. These boats are usually over 16 feet in length, and powered by a 10 horse power motor or more. • Cruiser- super structure, flying bridge, two windshields usually visible, hull mostly covered. This craft usually has sleeping accommodations. Sailboat- sails often visible, single hull-long slender shape, # amaran-twin hulls visible. Pontoon- rectangular shape, outboard motor, pontoons (end beyond the platform, These boats are often seen with a colorful canvas top. v ‘ House Boat- relatively large, rectangular shape w* olunt rounded bow. This superstructure is sometimes present. Charter Boat- excursion or party boats that ar icensed by LMCD. • * Fiahino Boat- any boat 14 feet or longer, u5 J for fishing. This craft is usually out- rigged with special fishing equipment. Personal Watercraft fPWCi- is a waterc t less than 14 feet in length, which uses a motor powering a water jet pump. Thir rater jet pump is its primary source of motive power. This craft is designed to t operated by a person in the sitting, standing or kneeling position, rather th in 1^ conventional manner such as sitting or standing inside the watercraft. Aircraft- anv contrivance invented or designed for navigation or flight in the air. The term includes airaaft equipped with floats or skis. Miscellaneous- This designation of watercraft ir^udes any craft other than rowboats, 16 feet or less in length. Miscellaneous watercraft are usually unmotorized, or sometimes equipped with motors of 10 hp or less. Some examples of this miscellaneous watercraft are canoes, wet sailboards and paddleboats. IMpCiMCill ailM Runabout Cruiser Sailboat Pontoon House Boat Charter Fishing PWC AircraR Misc.Riparian Multiple Grand Total 1. Halstead Bay 112 26 2 21 1 0 19 25 1 25 232 30 262 2. Priest Bay 55 14 6 13 0 0 8 20 1 13 130 0 130 3. Cooks Bay 115 22 6 20 1 0 21 13 0 21 124 128 252 n 4. West Upper Lake 97 35 14 14 0 0 23 38 0 28 249 35 284 5. South Upper Lake 58 49 12 10 0 0 23 18 0 29 199 125 324 6. SmHhtovvn Bay 78 13 2 3 0 0 6 20 0 14 86 24 110 7. Phelps Bay 113 32 13 24 0 0 27 23 0 24 141 115 256 ri 8. East Upper Lake 91 20 8 7 0 0 14 29 0 12 181 0 181 9. Carman Bay 80 38 9 10 1 0 11 23 0 24 195 9 205 10. Old Channel Bay 31 8 3 2 0 0 3 12 0 3 62 4 . ■ 11. Spring Park Bay 66 18 13 4 2 0 5 16 0 12 136 154 12. Black Lake 75 34 1 17 1 0 17 8 0 16 102 110 212 n 13. Emerald Lake 17 10 0 1 0 0 5 5 0 3 37 5 an 14. SetonLake 44 12 0 3 2 0 12 3 0 9 60 31 91 n^ -" 15. Harrisons Bay 148 66 4 22 2 1 26 32 0 20 157 154 311 n 16. Jennings Bay 34 12 3 4 0 0 8 9 0 5 36 91 i27n 17. West Arm 232 99 13 44 3 0 29 49 0 36 467 in 18. Forest Lake 64 28 0 10 0 0 5 16 0 16 139 13 152 19. Coffee Cove 44 23 1 5 1 0 3 5 0 5 87 4 91 20. Cryct-^i Bay, West 89 47 2 11 1 0 18 16 0 25 209 0 209 21. Crystal Bay, East 33 19 1 5 0 0 10 17 0 6 91 2 93 22. North Arm 92 36 7 23 0 0 20 18 0 42 238 6 2a 23. Stubbs Bay 35 12 1 9 0 0 13 14 0 15 100 8 100 24. Maxwell Bay 29 14 2 2 0 1 0 11 20 0 4 82 157 239 25. Lafayette Bay 99 28 8 5 3 2 14 29 0 14 202 19 221 2S. Smiths Bay 5 6 3 3 0 0 6 1 0 0 24 79 103 27. TanagerLake 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 90 97 28. Browns Bay 33 11 7 1 0 0 4 9 0 12 77 97 174 29. WayaataBay 70 48 29 4 0 0 17 31 0 40 239 355 5M 30. Grays Bay 36 36 3 5 0 0 21 12 0 27 140 133 273 31. LibbsUke 75 21 0 6 0 0 8 4 0 17 131 12 ia 32. Robinsons Bay 16 3 2 0 0 0 2 5 0 9 37 13 50 33. St Louis Bay 4 7 9 1 0 0 3 2 0 7 33 1 243 276 34. Carsons Bay 44 28 27 2 0 0 21 2 0 32 156 147 303 38. St Albans Bay 87 34 1 4 1 0 16 14 0 32 189 3a 537 36. Excelsior Bay 12 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 21 50 60 37. Gideons Bay 147 35 18 18 1 0 17 27 0 33 296 114 410 38. Echo Bay 30 9 9 4 0 0 9 9 0 16 86 204 290 39. Big Island Passage 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 4 40. Veterans Bay 3 0 0 3 0 0 4 1 0 5 -6 0 16 41. Lovrer Lake South 45 14 19 2 0 0 13 7 0 20 120 0 120 42. Lower Lake North 65 31 20 4 2 0 18 18 0 22 180 0 M79 Tbiil 1999 " "TW 992 1 270 ""‘348 •1;F512;f-htA 69t i ^90 329i 8797 1999 Multiple Dock Storage Count (Appendix C) Runabout I Cruiser I Sailboat Pontoon I House Boat Charter Boat Fishing Boat PWC Aircraft Misc.Tout Multiple 1. Halstead Bay 1 12. Priest Bay 3. Cooks Bay 6 i28n 4. West Upper Lake 8 5. South Upper Lake 1 125 6. SmHhtoum Bay 1 7. Phelps Bay ii£n 8. East Upper Lake f. Carman Bay iO. Okf Channel Bay 1 11. Spring Park Bay 12. Black Lake 8 154 - ^ 110 O 13. Emerald Lake 14. SetonLake 1 1 1 310 15. Harrisons Bay 1540 16. Jennings Bay 910 17. West Arm 1 1770 18. Forest Lake 6 19. Coffee Cove 20. Crystal Bay, West 21. Crystal Bay. East 22. North Arm 23. Stubbs Bay 24. Maxwell Bay 69 1 6 157 25. Lafayette Bay 1 126. Smiths Bay 1 1 1 27. TanagerLake 28. Browns Bay 29. WayzataBay 125 149 355 30. Grays Bay 133 31. LibbsUke 32. Robinsons Bay 6 33. St. Louis Bay 66 103 243 134. Carsons Bay 86 147 35. St. Albans Bay 210 3a 136. Excelsior Bay 37. Gideons Bay Echo Bay 8 1 39. Big Isiand Passage 40. VMeransBay 114 204 41. Lower Lake South 42. Lower Lake North iJZH 1 1220 600 440 120 0 273 ?"i;"V i 3296 Docks with 3 Boats, 4 boats, ana bmpty blips (Appendix U) 4 • • i rrv iMpjL meeting ^yj LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION November 9, 1999 Cl »Y Ul- OHONO LMCD Board Big Island Task Force Members /] TO: FROM: Greg Nybeck, Executive Director SUBJECT: Update on Big Island On 10/28/99, Uie first meeting of the Big Island Task Force was held at 9;00 a.m. at the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Water Patrol office. Those in attendance, in addition to myself, included Orono Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Spring Park Mayor Jerry Rockvam, Board members McMillan and Foster, MN DNR representative Kim Elverum, Orono Police Chief Gary Cheswick, and Lt. Ken Schilling from the Water Patrol. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss activities that took place on the north side of Big Island, Cruiser’s Cove, this past summer, and to discuss wliat could be implemented to better control these activities in the future. The majority of the discussion focused on two issues. First, there was discussion on whether there is a need to establish public safety lanes in this area of the lake. Second, there was discussion on whether there is a need to establish a lakewide rafting ordinance. In theory, a rafting ordinance would restrict the number of boats that could be tied together and would require a minimal distance between the cluster of boats rafted together. After signiflcai. jiscussion amongst Task Force members, there was consensus on these two issues that should be brought to the attention of the LMCD Board. This includes: • The Task Force recommends the LMCD Board should establish public safety lanes, in Cruiser’s Cove, for the 2000 boating season so the Water Patrol would have access to both the land on Big Island and to the water that is now sometimes completely congested with anchored and rafted boats. Further details of the exact layout, the type of buoys to be used, and the wording of such an ordinance still needs to be addressed. • There was substantial discussion by the Task Force regarding adopting a lakewide rafting ordinance that would limit the number of boats that could be tied together and would require groups of rafted boats to be a minimum distance apart so the Water Patrol could access all boats that are rafted. The Task Force thinks that such a lakewide ordinance might lend some protection to other parts of the lake from developing large rafts of boats that choose to leave Cniiser’s Cove. Tlic Task Force recommends, at this time, that such an ordinance does not need to be created for the 2000 boating season. This will allow for more careful research, study, and discussion as to the right number of boats to limit, the minimum distance required between groups of lufted boats, the impact on boaters, and the need for education and acceptance by die boaters of such an ordinance. Attached are letters from the Water Patrol and the MN DNR stating their positions on these issues. BOARD ATTENDANCE RECORD 1998 & 1!r r r I Tiy.ir* h-t V')m- Andrea Ahrens Bob Ambrose Doug Babcock KentDahlen Craig Eggers (1) Bert Foster Tom Gilman Greg Kitchak (2) Lili McMillan Craig Nelson Gene Partyka BobRaacop Herb Suerth Sheldon Wert 79 % 53 % 89% 63% 62 % 89 % 63 % 82% 89% 74% 89% 74% 68% 63% Andrea Ahrens Bob Ambrose Doug Babcock Kent Dahlen Craig Eggen Bert Foster Tom Gilman Greg Kitchak LiU McMillan Craig Nelson Gene Partyka BobRaacop Herb Suerth Sheldon Wert 47 % 40% 87% 80% 73% 80% 73 % 100% 93% 67% 93% 73% 80% 33% (1) Victoria did not have a representative for six meetings. Minn^onka did not have a representative for two meetings. Two meetings were cancelled due to a lack of a quorum. • V •. : *.• • * '• * • * . .'•ww-li? tt.* James R. R enckens 4680 Forestview Lane Plymouth, MN SS442 (612) 559-2380 COUNCIL MEETING NOV z&mzD ^■'•^0^^1999 CH V v^nCiVO November 12, 1999 Mayor Gabriel Jabbour 985 Tonkawa Road Orono, MN 44323 Edward J. Callahan, Jr. Gray Plant Mooty Mooty & Bennett 33 South Sixth Street, #3400 Minneapolis, MN 55402-3796 Gentlemen: Richard N. Flint Gray Plant Mooty Mooty & Bennett 33 South Sixth Street, #3400 Minneapolis, MN 55402-3796 ^yRon Moorse ^ City Administrator Orono City Hall 2750 Kelly Parkway Long Lake, MN 55356 I would like to express my support to the appeal set forth in John Winston ’s letter to you of November 3,1999 that the City of Orono and the Design Review Committee take appropriate action to mitigate the adverse environmental impact of the Highway 12 Corridor project on our neighborhood. I was sincerely impressed by your commitment to protect our neighborhood when I appeared before you at several City Council meetings this summer. I can now only hope that your resolve to do so was serious and that it remains strong. Very truly yours, James R. Renckens Copy: John B. Winston James R. R enckens 4680 Forestview Lane Plymouth, MN 55442 (612)559-2380 November 12,1999 Tom O’Keefe, P.E. Minnesota Department of Transportation Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN SSI 13 Dear Mr. O’Keefe: I am writing to comment on your letter of September 13, 1999 to John Winston regarding the Highway 12 Corridor project. While the position you arc taking with respect to protecting our neighborhood from the adverse environmental impact of the Midway 12 project may be expedient for Mn/DOT, it remains unacceptable. Oir neighborhood deserves the same mitigation protection as the neighborhoods to our East. Further, I should tell you that I now feel insulted by Mn/DOT’s ambiguous and disingenuous responses to our inquiries this past summer. I was surely give the wrong impression in believing that Mn/DOT was sincerely concerned about protecting all neighborhoods affected by the project It has been clear all along that the only reasonable way to protect our neighb^ho<^ is to acquire sufficient right-of-way to construct an earthen berm along the open corridor. It seems to me that your position on that matter was clearly known to you all along. Therefore, I feel you leave me no alternative but to vigwously object to Mn/DOT’s proposed design at our neighborhood and will consider all available means of remedy including, if necessary, the courts. Regards, James R. Renckens Copy: Edward J. Callahan, Jr. Richard N. Flint w^on Moorse Mayor Gabriel Jabbour John B. Winston I