HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-27-1999 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1999, 7:00 P.M.
ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA
C") Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council
under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the
Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet.
ROLL CALL
CONSENT AGENDA
1.Approve/Amend
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 2 1 1999
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
*2. Regular Council Meeting of September 13, 1999
CITY OF OhUivu
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Susan Wilson, Representative
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - Lili McMillan, Representative
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Bill Stoddard, Representative
PUBUC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
7^ #2492 Rick and Gail Luzaich, 2490 Old Beach Road - Variances and Conditional Use Permit -
Resolution
■V 4. #2510 Douglas and Claudia Whiteley/David and Heidi Hust, 60 Orono Orchard Road South and
45 Smith Avenue - Class I Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Resolution
#2516 Jeff Martineau, 1420 Shoreline Drive - Variances and Request for Sewer Unit - Resolution
6.#2519 Matthew and Robin Staloch, 4705 Watertown Road - Variance - Resolution
#2520 Tom Berthiaume, 3035 Casco Point Road - \ ariances - Resolution
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT
ENGINEER REPORT
^8.Revised Assessment for Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer - Resolution
4^ 9.Revised Assessment for Edgewood Hills Sanitaiy Sewer - Resolution
-X 10 Award Contract for Stubbs Bay Cul-de-Sac Projea - Resolution
11.Saga Hill Park Access Road
^12 Change Order #3 and Request for Final Pavn.ent • Navarre Water Plant Rehabilitation
CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
13.Fee Schedule Amendment - Ordinance
14.Hiring of Part-Time Community SerN-ice Officer
^15. Approve Purchase of Video Cameras for Police Squad Cars
A
r
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1999, 7:00 P.M.
ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
* 16. LICENSES
* 17. BILLS
UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS
;y,. . . ) •
1999
09/23 - Council/Planning Commission Work Session 7;30 a m.
09/27 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m.
10/04 - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m.
10/11 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m.
10/18 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m.
10/25 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m.
Public A ttendance
Meeting Date (/
/
d C ouncil
Planning Commission
Park C ommission Please fill out the information
REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.
□ Other
c;
•
NAME (please print)ADDRESS
PRESENT FOR (from agenda)
NAME OR NUMBER
2.
3. /;//:• I'
4. n-E-^rt/r
5. (yuliv^■? JT U P6a a < j*
6.- r4c>v:f(V / ^ve 1 rt o h/
7..
8..
9.
10..
11..
n..
13..
14.
15.
XMITS\WfWINfirJ^TDOCyJOR5IS\Pt'IUC.\TT
1999 Lake Minnetonka
Shoreline Storage Count
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 2 7 1999
CITY OF QhO jvO
INTRODUCTION
The Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka, adopted in December of 1991, has
established Lake Use Objectives for the lake. Beginning in 1992, and every other year
thereafter, one of these objectives is to measure watercraft density and the distribution
of beached and rafting watercraft on Lake Minnetonka. At the August 12, 1998 Regular
Board Meeting, the Board reviewed the 1998 data presented to them. Because the
1998 Shoreline Storage Count revealed a 22% decrease in the number of watercraft
stored on Lake Minnetonka compared to 1996, the Board directed staff to conduct
another survey in 1999 to verify the 1998 data.
Three primary objectives were established for the 1999 Shoreline Storage Count. They
include:
1. Establish the total number of watercraft stored in 1999.
2. Outline dnta collected from historical Shoreline Storage Counts.
3. Identify any observable conclusions and trends from the Shoreline Storage
data collected.
METHODOLOGY
To ensure consistency and accuracy in the 1999 Shoreline Storage Count, LMCD staff
established parameters in which the storage inventory was to be conducted. Detailed
below is a summary of these parame rs.
1. Survey all 125 miles of lakeshore frontage on Mondays through Thursdays,
between the hours of 7:30 AM and 12:00 PM. This time has been selected to
best represent when observers could count the maximum number of
Watercraft stored on Lake Minnetonka. Friday was established to be an
alternative day when weather conditions were not favorable.
2. The count was to be conducted during the month of June with a completion
date of July 4
3. The watercraft count was to be conducted by LMCD staff from the 18 foot
runabout owned by the District.
4. A shoreline storage count worksheet was created to assist in conducting
the shoreline storage inventory. Ten classifications of watercraft were
established on this worksnee. to categorize each watercraft type These
watercraft classifications include, runabout, cruiser, sailboat, pontoon,
houseboat, charter boat, fishing boat, personal watercraft, aircraft, and
miscellaneous watercraft. Further definition of these watercraft classifications
are outlined in Appendix A.
5 Residences that had docks with 3 boats, 4 boats, and empty slips were also
identified in 1999, In this Report, a slip was defined as either a docking
structure with three dearly defined sides or a boat lift. This data was not
collected in 1998.
1
SUMMARY OF THE 19»9 SHORELINE STORAGE COUNT
The total number of watercraft stored, boached or rafting on Lake Minnetonka for 1999
was 8,797. Appendix B highlights this figure and provides a breakdown, by watercraft
classification and bay. Further analysis indicate that 5,499 watercraft were stored at
riparian residences and that 3,298 watercraft were stored at multiple dock facilities.
Results indicate that over 51 % of the watercraft counted on Lake Minnetonka were
either found in the runabout or cruiser classification. The lowest percent of watercraft
stored on the lake were classified in the houseboat, charter boat and aircraft
classifications with less than 1 %.
Appandix B highlights the 5,499 watercraft stored at riparian residences in 1999.
Approximately 65% of the watercraft stored on riparian shoreline were found to be in
either the runabout cr cruiser classification. Further breakdown of this figure indicates
that 47% of the watercraft inventoried were runabouts and that 18% were cruisers. The
lowest percent of watercraft stored at riparian residences were found to be in the house
boat, cnarter boat, and aircraft classifications, which total less than 1 %. These
percentages are slightly skewed because District staff was unable to distinguish the
watercraft cour ted, by classification, at riparian residences because of the Mound
Commons Docking Program. Further details of this drawback are discussed later in the
text.
Appendix C highlights the 3,298 watercraft stored at multiple docks in 1999.
Approximately 56% of watercraft stored at multiple docks were found to be in either the
runabout and cruiser classification. Further breakdown of this figure indicates that 38%
of the watercraft were runabouts and that 18% were cruisers. The lowest percentage of
watercraft stored at multiple docks were houseboat, charter boat, and aircraft
classifications, which total less than 1 %. Again, these percentages are slightly skewed
because District staff was unable to distinguish the watercraft counted, by classification,
at multiple dock facilitieo because of the Mound Commons Docking Program.
The City of Mound indicated to District staff that 538 watercraft, on eight bays, were
located at the Mound Commons Docks in 1999. These bays are highlighted by an (*) in
Appendix B and C. Further breakdown of these watercraft are detailed below:
Cooks Bay 96
Phelps Bay 115
Black Lake 67
Emerald Lake 4
Seton Lake 25
Harrisons Bay 154
Jennings Bay 39
West Arm 38m
Because this documentation was provided by the City of Mound, the Report is accurate
with regards to total riparian and multiple do(^ watercraft inventoried in 1999 The
drawback is that these 530 watercraft were not broken down by watercraft classification
by the City of Mound. The end result is that these 638 watercraft are documented in the
riparian storage ciassification count rather than the multipie dock storage classification
count.
Appendix D highlights residences that had docks with 3 boats, 4 boats, and empty slips.
In 1999, there were 279 residences that had 3 boats stored at the dock, there were 168
residences that had 4 boats stored at the dock, and there were 409 empty slips. At the
residences with 3 and 4 boats, there was no distinction between restricted and
unrestricted watercraft.
SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL SHORELINE COUNTS
Appendix E highlights historical shoreline storage counts from 1971 to 1999. Watercraft
identified in these historical counts ranged from a low of 5,245 in 1971 to a high of
10,475 in 1996.
CONCLUSIONS /TRENDS
Based on LMCD staff review of the data collected from the 1999 shoreline survey, the
following conclusionsArends have been observed;
• The data collected in 1999 appears to corroborate the data collected in 1998.
• There apperrs to be a leveling off of personal watercraft (PWC) stored on
Lake Minnetonka. The figure of 644 in 1998 compares to 639 in 1999.
• There appears to be a decrease in cruisers stored on the lake. The figure of
1,917 in 1998 has decreased to 1,692 in 1999, a 17 % decrease. This could
be attributed to the difficulty, at times, in distinguishing between a cruiser and
a runabout. This appears to be substantiated with a 14 % increase in 1999
from 1998 in the storage of runabouts. There were 3,269 runabouts
inventoried in 1998 compared to 3,788 in 1999.
• There appears to be a leveling off of sailboats stored on Lake Minnetonka.
The figure of 720 in 1998 compares to 719 in 1999.
• There appears to be a slight increase in fishing boats stored on Lake
Minnetonka. In 1998 there were 732 and In 1999 there were 785, a 7%
iiicrease.
• There were several residences on Lake Minnetonka that had 3 and 4 boats
stored at their docks, 447. Future inventories should distinguish between
restricted and unrestricted watercraft at these residences.
• There were several residences that had empty slips identified at their docks,
409. Although empty slips have not been factored in past Reports on the total
number of boats stored on Lake Minnetonka, it might be valid to include them
in future Reports.
Watercraft Classification Definitions
Appendix A
• Runabout- single hull-pointed bow, tri-huil-blunt bow, hull may be partially covered,
windshield often visible. These boats are usually over 16 feet in length, and
powered by a 10 horse power motor or more.
Cruiser- super structure, flying bridge, two windshields usually visible, hull mostly
covered. This craft usually has sleeping accommodations.
• Sailboat- sails often visible, single hull-long slender shape, catamaran-twin hulls
visible.
• Pontoon- rectangular shape, outboard motor, pontoons extend beyond the platform.
These boats are often seen with a colorful canvas top.
• House Boat- relatively large, rectangular shape with blunt rounded bow. This
superstructure is sometimes present.
• Charter Boat- excursion or party boats that are licensed by LMCD.
• Fishing Boat- any boat 14 feet or longer, used for fishing. This craft is usually out-
rigged with special fishing equipment.
Personal Watercraft (PWCi- Is a watercraft less than 14 feet in length, which uses
a motor powering a water jet pump. This water jet pump is Its primary source of
motive power. This craft is designed to be operated by a person in the sitting,
standing or kneeling position, rather than in the conventional manner such as sitting
or standing inside the wateraaft.
Aircraft- any contrivance invented or designed for navigation or flight in the air. The
term includes aircraft equipped with floats or skis.
Miscellaneous- This designation of watercraft includes any craft other than
rowboats, 16 feet or less in length. Miscellaneous watercraft are usually
unmotorized, or sometimes equipped with motors of 10 hp or less. Some examples
of this miscellaneous watercraft are canoes, wet sailboards and paddleboats.
Historical Shoreline Storage Count Data (Appendix E)
1 - Ywr Runabout Cruisor Sailboat Pontoon Houseboat charter Fishing a pwc r Aircraft ^MiSC.Total
1999 3788 1592 719 477 31 26 785 639
2 738 8797
1993 3269 1917 720 461 32 20 732 644 4 809 8608
1996 2907 3117 1021 413 48 26 1135 796 4 1008 10475
1994 2629 2812 874 439 47 26 1202 448 8 875 9404
1993 3056 2016 839 381 40 24 1263 318 6 912 8883
1992 2836 2117 840 386 35 25 1245 273 0V/881 8647
1991 1 3258 1350 890 349 37 25 1210 243 8 700 8070
1990 1606 2206 784 304 44 0 824 157 4 720 6649
1989 1653 2568 748 260 62 0 806 0 7 707 6811
1988 1983 2876 966 236 70 0 816 0 5 567 7519
1987 2134 2771 1064 239 61 0 1009 0 5 723 8006
1986 2512 2816 1238 286 99 0 1047 0 3 795 8796
1985 2882 2186 1056 271 104 0 1022 0 3
644 8168
1984 2638 2153 1182 321 94 0 1075 0 4 724 8191
1983 2930 1958 1207 326 89 0 906 0 5 416 7837
1982 2607 1699 1294 351 91 0 1106 0 5 297 7450
1981 2519 1765 1512 342 105 0 848 0 4 681 7776
1980 2632 1630 1135 394 118 0 511 0 5 483 6908
1979 2694 1549 1372 391 113 0 995 0 5 543 7662
1975 3259 1074 1648 448 156 0 1621 n 0 0 917 9123
1974 3309 872 1288 557 147 0 1850 (*)0 0 903 9352
j 1973 1543 528 984 506 101 0 1543 (*)0 0 609 8711
1971 1620 320 535 364 91 0 1326 (*)0 0 255 5245
*
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
18338 Minnetonka Blvd.
Deephaven, MN 55391
745-0789
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NEWSLETTER
Gregory S. Nybeck
August 11| 1999
Exotics Management: This project commenced on 6/14/99 and is planned through 8/13/99.
To date, harvesting has been done in Phelps Bay, S. Upper Lake, W. Upper Lake, Cooks
Bay, Emerald Lake, Seton Lake, Black Lake, Carman Bay, Old Channel Bay, Lafayette Bay,
Echo Bay, Gideon Bay, Excelsior Bay, S. Lower Lake, N. Lower Lake, Wayzata Bay, Grays
Bay, Browns Bay, Smiths Bay, Crystal Bay, Maxwell Bay, and North Arm. Second cuts have
been done in Grays Bay, St. Albans Bay, Gideon Bay, Carman Bay, and Old Channel Bay.
Harvesting is planned to conclude in Phelps Bay and Spring Park ^y.
Consistent with past years, harvesting priorities have been based upon impediment to public
boat navigation on the open water. Although there are areas of the lake with significant
milfoil growth, we are not harvesting them unless they are impeding public boat navigation.
Feel free to have your office staff or residents call the office if we can be of assistance.
At its :/9/99 meeting, the LMCD Board authorized approximately $30,000 worth of funds to
work with Carmichael Lynch in launching a public awareness plan for 1999. Elements of the
public awareness plan include the production costs and space rental of four billboards on an
eight-week cycle, the production costs of two print ads that could be displayed in locd
newspapers and other sources, and the production of a stencil that could used at public and
private accesses around the lake. These expenditures, which will be funded from both the
Zebra Mussel and Save the T^ake budgets, should assist in creating public awareness in
preventing the spread of zebra mussels from infested waters.
^opose^ nrHinanrp fhunge relating to boat storage density and multiple dock facilities^
The LMCD Board conducted a public hearing at its 7/14/99 meeting to discuss an ordinance
that would amend existing Code relating to boat storage density and multiple dock facilities
for new developments and re-developments on Lake Minnetonka. Three areas of the existing
Code are being addressed in this draft Code amendment. They include! 1) to minimize the
impact of multiple dock facilities, that utilize an outlet, on nearby properties, 2) to change the
mechanism for measuring the amount of shoreline to credit when it is a meandering line, and
3) to change the General Rule from 1:50’ to 1:100’. The Board continued the public hearing
to its 7/28/99 meeting, in which continued public testimony was received. We will keep you
informed on the status of this proposed ordinance amendment.
Charter Boat Rules: At its 6/23/99 meeting, the LMCD Board updated its rules and
regulations relating charter boat activity and liquor licenses on Lake Minnetonka. A memo
summarizing the changes in the rules and regulations was previously sent by District staff on
7/23/99. These rule changes, in addition to the mandatory annual training sessions for charter
boat owners that was implemented this past spring, should be of great assistance in ensuring
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NEWSLETTER, 8/11/99, PAGE 2
that operations and activities on charter boats are being conducted as not to interfere with the
peaceful enjoyment of Lake Minnetonka and of surrounding properties by riparian owners and
by the public. Feel free to call the office if you have questions.
* 15>99 Lake Minnetonka Shoreline Count: Staff has conducted the field work for a shoreline
storage count of watercraft for 1999. This management plan project, which was conducted in
1998, is to be completed every two years. When the Report was presented last summer, staff
was directed to conduct the project in 1999 to validate the results of the 1998 Lake
Minnetonka Shoreline Count. Further details of this project will be provided when available.
* 2000 LMCD Budget: The 2000 LMCD budget was certified by the Board at its 6/9/99
meeting and forwarded to it member cities on 6/25/99 in accordance with state enabling
legislation. Minnesota State Statutes 103B.635 states the Board must on or before July 1 of
each year prepare and submit a detailed budget of the District’s needs, for the next calendar
year, to the governing body of each municipality in the District with a statement of the
proportion of the budget to be provided by each municipality. The approved budget has
forwarded a total levy of $190,679 to the 14 member communities. It is anticipated that
reserve fund accounts for Administration and EWM/Exolics will meet agreed upon policy
levels by 12/31/99.
The City of Spring Park has requested a public hearing be scheduled to allow cities to
comment on the adopted 2000 LMCD Budget A public hearing iias been scheduled for the
8/11/99 Board meeting. Any changes to the approved budget based on this pubhe hearing wili
be forwarded in a timely manner.
* On«£oing Licenscs/Permits; Staff has completed the processing of all new and renewal
without change applications for licensed multiple doclu, charter boats, associated liquor
licenses, and special event permits for Lake Minnetonka. Staff has also generally completed
all multiple dock license inspections for 1999. Feel free to call the office if you have
questions or concerns regarding a specific license/permit or a multiple dock license inspection.
* BU Hawks Boathouse: The civil lawsuit filed by Mr. Hawks against the LMCD challenging
LMCD Code Section 2.12, Subd. 2 was dismiss^ in Hennepin County District court on
5/26/98. Also, the Court ruled favorably for the countersuit filed by the LMCD seeking an
injunction requiring the storage boat to be removed from Lake Minnetonka. Mr. Hawks was
directed to cither remove the storage boat from Lake Minnetonka or to convert it into a
houseboat. Mr. Hawks appealed the 5/26/98 Hennepin County District court ruling and the
case was heard by t.he Court of Appeals on 12/16/98. The Court of Appeals upheld the ruling
of the 5/26/98 Hennepin County District court Mr. Hawks petitioned the Minnesota State
Supreme Court to review the decision of the Court of Appeals. The Minnesota State Supreme
Court denied the petition from Mr. Hawks.
WebPage; The LMCD WebPage address is: http.7/www.wimemet.com/"lmcd/
09-17-1999 12:55 612 4710532 LMCO P.Ol
tord Fletchers
t 14 I A »• ►Mill M ► I «> »«► A
Septembers, 1999
To: LMCD Board of Director*irectog^
or three times each summer.
Over the pest few years, these parties have changed dramatically, incorporaupg a more
rowdy and intoxicated element. These people find their way to our establishment.
Despite our efforts of increased security, management, and regulations, we are unable to
control the entrance of n.s>iy of these individuals.
Lord Fletcher’s strives to stat alcohol responsibly to our guests. In order to ac^mplish
uus while these events occur, we have done a few things including not ^
certain drinks with high alcohol content, and even have closed our opwalion as much as
two hours early. Clearly you can see that we are sacrificing guest satisfaction an
revenue in order to avoid dreadful situations that occur as a result of these party goers.
It has truly become a stressful situation to which Lord Fletcher’s management no longer
cares to subject our associates and non-part>’ going guests.
f
We want to be very clear that we do realize that not everyone coming from
causes Lord Fletcher’s concern. Many of our boating guests are very respectful of our
staff and facility. Those guests who do cause problems, however, cause us much
concern.
We would be very happy to assist the LMCD in any way that we might find a solution to
this challenge.
Sincerely,
Mike J. Tewey
General Manager
litl 0 n 44^ SPRING PARK.
Mil 4fl 111® KAXi itl 4fl RR3F MNII**4«044i TttbinONK All •
r ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13, 1999
5EP 2 7 '1799ROLL
CITY OF OHONCf
The Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present; Mayor
Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Charles Kelley, Richard Flint, Bob Sansevere, and Barbara
Peterson. Representing Staff were City Admiivstrator Ron Moorse, Public Services Director
Greg Gappa, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, City
Engineer Tom Kellogg, Zonirig Administrator/Planner Paul Weinberger and Recorder Lanette
Wolf. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7;00 p m.
(#1) RECOGNITION OF MIKE BYRNES, RESOLUTION NO. 4342
Moorse read a resolution of appreciation to Mike Byrnes for his efl'orts in support of the
community and the Orono Police Department.
Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to adopt Resolution No. 4342, a Resolution
of Appreciation to Mike Byrnes for his Support of Public Safety Activities in the
Community. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Jabbour presented a framed copy of the resolution to Mr Bynies and thanked him for his
support of public safety activities in the community
(#2) CONSENT AGENDA
Item 3 was removed from the Consent Agenda and items 5, \ 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,
18, and 20 were added to the Consent Agenda.
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as
amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
(#3) REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 23. 1999
Flint referred to the Mayor/Council Report on page 12 of the minutes He said that the firs
sentence of the second paragraph should read as follows:
“Jabbour reported that he and Mr. Flint met with Hennepin Parks; Peter Johnson, a resident of
Mound; and A1 Vogal, Director of Waterways, Freight and Railroads for Mn/DOT, to ^?din a
better understanding of what might happen with the railroad ”
Flint moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council
meeting of August 23,1999, as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Page 1
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MLNUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Jay Nygard, Representative
None
PUBUC COMMENTS
John Winston, 144 Wear Lane North, and Jim Renckens, 3C20 Watertown Road were
present. Winston said he and Mr. Renckens wanted to express their concern with the
relocation of the railroad and Highway 12 and the apparent decision of the State not to place a
berm or some type of sound/noise/light barrier between their neighborhood and the relocated
railroad and highway. It is their understanding that the State has made a decision that their
neighborhood is not impacted to such an extent that any kind of barrier will be installed. They
are concerned about the adverse impact this will cause to their property value. He said he does
not feel it will do any good for him and Mr. Renckens to plead their case with Mn/DOT unless
the City of Orono expresses a concern. He requested that the City Council express these
concerns before the Design Review Committee.
Renckens said he spoke with Tom O’Keefe from Mn/DOT who confirmed that because of
cost considerations and their properties do not immediately abut the roadway, Mn/DOT does
not feel it is warranted to protect their neighborhood. Mr. O’Keefe told him that the only way
to overturn that decision at this time is by the political process.
Jabbour briefed Winston and O’Keefe on the fact that the City’s position has always been that
Mn/DOT shall protect all the property, including present and future homes, along the road.
The Design Review Committee was formed so that each neighborhood could decide what
would be appropriate for them, but Mn/DOT has very strict guidelines. There must be at least
three homes within a specific distance before Mn/DOT will put in a barrier or protection.
Many places in Orono do not meet the guidelines because of the two-acre zoning. Mn/DOT
replied that they would not discuss it until the guidelines were met. Jabbour said that there
was a recent subdivision ihat created five additional homes and it was submitted to Mn/DOT.
He said the City’s strategy has been to work closely with Mr. O’Keefe. He suggested that
perhaps some of the other lots in their neighborhood would have to be subdivided to meet
Mn/DOT ’s guidelines.
Kelley said that the lots belonging to Alan Carlson are almost landlocked and may need to be
subdivided.
Winston said he wants it on the record that they requested that the environmental impacts to
their neighborhood be minimized.
Jabbour said their concerns have been conveyed to Mn/DOT in the past. He said that their
concerns will be brought up again and he encouraged Winston and Renckens to voice their
opinions to Mn/DOT.
Page 2
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
PUBLIC COMMENTS- Continued
Renckens said he doesn’t feel it should be as controversial for Mn/DOT as it apparently is to
provide protection for their neighborhood. He asked if the Mayor and the Council would be
willing to meet with them and Tom O’Keefe to discuss this issue.
Jabbour said he would be willing to meet with them, but it would be easier if more homes will
be affected.
Moorse said that funding for the right-of-way acquisition needed for the berms is an obstacle
for Mn/DOT.
Jabbour said he was told at ihe last meeting with Mn/DOT that this will be a difficult
acquisition because the right-of-way is very expensive and may take an additional year to
obtain.
Flint said that the latest communication from Mn/DOT states: “Mn/DOT will employ all
reasonably available noise mitigation measures. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is in
the process of rewriting rules including the noise standards. Mn/DOT will construct noise
walls up to a height of 20 feet in an effort to obtain noise standards as defined by the MPCA if
the construction is a cost effective means of obtaining noise standards. We cannot guarantee
that noise levels will not be increased. Mn/DOT is committed to continue working with the
cities and neighborhoods to design the project in such a way as to minimize noise and visual
impacts to the greatest extent possible.” He said that, in a general way, Mn/DOT expresse.s
full support for Mr. Winston ’s and Mr. Rencken ’s concerns. The Design Review Committee
has to keep pressing Mn/DOT on the specifics of the design.
Jabbour suggested that Mr. Winston and Mr. Renckens open a dialogue with Mr. Carlson
regarding his property because it is immediately adjacent to the highway.
John Mayer, Mayer Distributing, said he will be required to relocate his business due to the
Highway 12 project. He is having a problem finding property for his bulk plant storage facility
for gasoline and diesel fuels He asked if the Council would consider amending the industrial
zoning code to permit a bulk petroleum storage plant. Mayer said that he has found a piece of
property that would be suitable, but he does not want to purchase the property if appropriate
zoning caimot be obtained Mayer said that there are new rules that apply to bulk plants which
improve the safety. He said his company has a good track record for safety.
Jabbour said the Council would need to determine if the use is appropriate and that should be
addressed through an application.
Moorse said this is a first step to let the Council know w hat Mr Mayer would like to do.
Page 3
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Susan Wilson
Susan Wilson said the Park Commission has been discussing working with the Crystal Bay
residents on an ice rink. She suggested that the Council consider incorporating a piece of City
property in the park before final plans are made for the park in Crystal Bay and she asked
whether the road between the park property and the City propeny is still needed.
Jabbour asked about the progress on the environmental upgrade of the site.
Gappa said that everything is complete except the monitoring wells must be pulled out.
Jabbour said that the Council would look into incorporating the City property in the park.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
(#4) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - VARIANCES
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Barrett reported the applicant's attorney requested that this matter be tabled.
Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, a motion to table Item #2492, 2490 Old Beach
Road, based upon the applicant’s request. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(•#5) #2511 DOUGLAS AND CLAUDIA WHITELY, 60 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD
SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4343
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4343, Granting a
Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 10, File
#2411,60 Orono Orchard Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#6) #2512 DAVID EROTAS ON BEHALF OF ALAN AND MARILYN RICHIE,
905 TONKAWA ROAD - PRELLMINARY PLAT - RESOLUTION NO. 4344
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4344 Granting Preliminary
Approval of a Class 111 Subdivision Located at 905 Tonkawa Road for Alan and
Marilyn Richie, File No. 2512. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#7) #2526 PETER ANDREA CO., 555 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH - FINAL
PLAT OF JACOBS MILL - RESOLUTION NO. 4345
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4345 Approving the Plat of
Jacobs Mill, File No. 2526. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Page 4
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT
Jabbour said that the impact of the activities on Big Island has been extremely negative to
Spring Park. He received letters of concern from the City of Spring Park, Lord Fletcher’s and
the Minnetonka Mist.
Jabbour reported that Rail America will cease operations on the Dakota Line on October
15th. Mn/DOT has decided that the track will stay in public ownership because it is identified
as a transportation corridor for light rail transit and other items. The Couucil is working
diligently with Mn/DOT and adjacent communities to make it a trail. Jabbour said that as Rail
America ceases to use and plow the track, it will become an automatic attraction for
snowmobile riders.
Kelley asked if Rail America would ®ve the City permission to put up fences at certain
locations.
Jabbour said he would like the City Administrator and ihe Chief of Police to communicate the
Council’s concern to the other cities and to work with Rail America to get their pemussion to
put up snow fences across the track bed. He does not feel that motorized vehicle traffic on the
track would be appropriate in Orono.
Jabbour stated that the City continues to work with Mr. Larson to acquire his land in Navarre
for a park. He said the City has also obtained the right-of-way for Saga Hill.
Gappa said the easement for the right-of-way will be recorded shortly.
Kelley suggested that the Council should think about design standards for buildings located in
the Highway 12 corridor. He said that other cities have design continuity from building to
building.
Sansevere and Flint agreed with Kelley.
Peterson raised a concern regarding the canopy at Orono Self Service. She does not feel the
existing lighting conforms to the conditions approved by the Council.
Jabbour said he understood that there would be down-focused lighting, no lighted canopy and
no spill over beyond the perimeter of the canopy.
Kelley said, in his opinion, the lighting does not meet those requirements.
Peterson said she does not believe those requirements were met.
Moorse said he understood that the lighting was to be focused down and it is not.
Page 5
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT- Continued
Jabbour said that if the City has not issued a certificate of occupancy. City staff should talk to
them about meeting the light requirements. If a certificate of occupancy has been issued, staff
should review the meeting minutes regarding this item and talk to them about it.
Sansevere said there is an interest on the part of the people involved in the Ice Arena to
acquire some park dedication fees in some way. He asked if park dedication fees could be
used to fund improvements at the Ice Arena.
Barrett said there is a provision in the Minnesota State Statutes that says that park dedication
fees can be used for certain kinds of projects including ice arenas, but it requires an ownership
position by the City. The City does not have an ownership position in the Ice Arena.
Flint said the Council has concluded that the park dedication fees should be used for land
acquisition, not capital improvements.
Jabbour said the City does not want to have an ownership interest in the Ice Arena. He feels
that if the City makes it a policy to contribute to sports activities, there should be criteria
under which the groups would qualify for funding. He said that all sports should have equal
right to compete for fiinds if there is a budget for sports activities.
Flint referred to Mark Engebretson’s comments that the Ice Arena is doing fine from an
operational standpoint, but they are having problems with the capital costs. He feels the City
should continue its position that these activities be funded privately.
ENGINEER REPORT
(#8) RECONSIDERATION OF “NO PARKING” SIGNS ON SHADYWOOD
ROAD
Gappa presented the staff report. He said the Council passed a resolution on the consent
agenda on June 28th to install “No Parking” signs along Shadywood Road north of the
Narrows Channel Bridge. Since Hennepin County installed the signs, staff has received several
letters from owners of Pheasant Lawn Dock Lots with concerns about the impact of no
parking restrictions on their lots. Gappa said he has studied this issue further and developed a
modified No Parking scenario for Council consideration The first solution to post the entire
wide shoulder area for No Parking was a conservative approach. He said the revised proposal
would keep No Parking restrictions in place for the entire northbound side of Shadywood
Road This is necessary to provide a deceleration lane for vehicles entering the driveways
along this side of Shadywood Road. He stat'id that on the southbound side, the beginning of
the No Parking area could be moved 100 feet south to provide space for parking of five cars
in the dock lot area. This would provide 120 feet of space to be used as a deceleration lane for
vehicles turning into the driveway. This should provide adequate stopping distance for a
vehicle speed of 30 mph when entering the deceleration lane Gappa reviewed the distances
Page 6
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
(»8) RECONSWERATFON OF **NO PARKING*^ SIGNS ONSHADYWOOD ROAD -
Continued
required for drivers traveling at certain speeds to recognize a hazard in the road and safely
stop a vehicle. The site distance for vehicles coming over the bridge is limited, which provides
insufficient time for traffic to react to vehicles attempting to pass turning vehicles. He said the
Council’s options include talcing no action, remove the No Parking signs, or move the
beginning of the No Parking area 100 feet south.
Jabbour asked why only the bridge area is a concern because the same situation applies to the
rest of County Road 19.
Gappa said that cars should not be parked on the rest of County Road 19 because the
shoulder is too narrow and no one has reported a parking problem in other areas. He said that
mos: of the County Roads near the lake are signed No Parking. He said there is no parking
allowed on any of the roads from 2;00 a.m. to 6:00 a m.
Dick Ogle, 2771 Shadywood Road, said he has been in contact with Don Lundstrom of
Hennepin County Traffic. Mr. Lundstrom told him that Hennepin County’s position is that
they do not want parking on county roads. He said that Tonka Bay, Minnetonka Beach,
Wayzata, Mound, and Orono have no parking on county roads. This is an extremely
dangerous road because it is a link of the Hennepin County Bicycle Trail. He said that Mr.
Rawlings, who was instiumental in the design and layout of the bridge when it was built, told
him that the bridge is wide so it can accommodate deceleration and turning lanes. He said that
on the Tonka Bay side, the road is posted No Parking and turn lanes are designated. Ogle said
the parking problem has developed in the last few years because some of the dock lots are no
longer owned by neighboring residents. He said that a condition of the resolution granting a
conditional use permit for the dock lots was that parking would be allowed for one car. When
the lots were owned by local residents, they would unload their boat and drive to an area
where there is public parking to pick up their passengers He feels there has been a lack of
communication regarding the parking requirements between the former owners and the new
non-resident owners.
Ogle said there was a problem in the spring with people fishing from the docks and parking on
the road. This encouraged more people to park on the road Ogle said bicycle riders will not
ride next to parked cars because there is a possibility of someone opening a car door and
causing serious injury to a bicycle rider. He said that Hennepin County is willing to post the
road with No Parking signs, but they leave it up to the cities to police it. Ogle said the
residents do not want parking allowed along County Road 19.
Sansevere asked if Mr. Ogle supports the amendment recommended by Mr. Gappa.
Ogle said he does not support the amendment because he feels it is not sate to have any
parking along County Road 19.
Page 7
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
(98) RECONSIDERATION OF **NO PARKING** SIGNS ON SHAD YWOOD ROAD -
Continued
Jabbour said this is a bad situation and it is non-conforming to Orono ’s standards. In Orono, if
you don’t have a primary structure, you cannot have a secondary structure. The dock lots
were developed prior to the establishment of Orono ’s standards. He asked where these people
can park if parking is prohibited. He would like everyone to work together to solve the
problem.
Jim Zimmerman, 2745 Shadywood Road, said he knows the owners of the dock lots have the
right to park one car. He said the local homeowners have allowed the dock lot owners ingress
and egress over their properties. He said this is a residential area, not a marina. He does not
feel that additional parking should be allowed.
Sansevere asked if each dock lot has a parking space.
Zimmerman said they can clearly parallel park one car with room for a car to pass. He said
that is what was agreed to by the City.
Jabbour said that at that time they could park on County Road 19.
Zimmerman said he thought it was agreed that there would be no parking along the County
Road, they would be allowed one off-street parking spot and that if there were other people to
come, they were to pick them up somewhere else where there was parking such as the public
docks in Spring Park. He said that all the rest of the roads around the lake are “No Parking ”.
He said safety is an issue and parking should not be allowed on County Road 19.
Jabbour asked if Zimmerman would approve enlarging the shoulder of the road to
accommodate parallel parking.
Zimmerman said he did not know if it would be appropriate to basically create a parking lot
along County Road 19 in a residential neighborhood.
Jabbour said he thinks people will park on the grass if they can ’t park on the road.
Zimmerman said there may be room along the service road to open up some space for
parking.
Sansevere asked if it would be possible to make room for parking along the service road.
Gappa said it would be difficult because of the topography.
Jabbour said that if it is resolved with parking along the service road, the Council should think
about allowing additional hardcover and grading.
Page 8
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
(#S) RECONSIDERATION OF **NO PARKING*' SIGNS ONSHADYWOOD ROAD -
Continued
Gappa said it would require a retaining wall to widen the hill.
Jabbour said it would also require a curb cut to allow ingress and egress.
Zimmerman asked if there is a reason to void what was a logical solution at the time the lots
transferred from residents of the neighborhoods to nonresidents. He thinks there was a logical,
well thought out solution to say this is a neighborhood, it is not a marina, there should not be
cars parked all over, we will allow one car to be parked to try and maintain the character and
integrity of the neighborhood. He said he is hearing now that there is some feeling that w'e
must allow for more parking and that the original agreement is no longer valid. He said that
one of the docks is rental property and it is rented out to one or two boats at a time. He feels
thu: perhaps the parking restrictions were not communicated to the renters. He feels the “No
Parking” works fine. He asked that the Council review the original minutes concerning the
dock lots
George Olson, 2775 Shadywood, said he lives in the neighborhood and owns one of the dock
lots. He explained that the first three lots are owned by neighbors so there is rarely a car
parked by those docks. He said the parking problem is by the lots on the far end. He said they
have access through the service road. He said they come over the curb on the other side. He
said one of owners has put gravel on his lot and last weekend there were six cars parked there.
He said there is no parking allowed on the other county roads and he asked why all of County
Road 19 isn’t consistent with the other roads He feels there should be no parking ail along
County Road 19.
Jabbour said that up until two or three years ago, parking was permitted on all of the county
roads. He described all the areas where parking is allowed on county roads.
Olson asked why County Road 15 is all No Parking.
Jabbour said County Road 15 is very substandard
Olson said the only spot where parking is allowed is this stretch of County Road 19.
Kelley said the Mayor has pointed out other areas where parking is allowed along county
roads.
Olson said that Hennepin County’s position is to have no parking along county roads, but they
have no way to enforce it and they look to the villages and cities where the county roads go
through to enforce the parking.
Kelley said he is not in favor of more regulation by government and he is only willing to look
at areas where there is a safety issue. He feels a safety issue does e.xist in this area.
Page 9
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
(ff8) RECOmTDERATION^OF^*NOPARKING**SIGNS ONSHADYWOOD ROAD -
Continued
Sansevere asked how many of the dock lots are owned by property owners from the
neighborhood.
Olson replied that there are eight lots and four are owned by local residents.
Richard Gay, 2735 Shadywood, said his primary concern is the safety issue for bicyclists. He
feels the dock lot owners have a right to some parking, but he does not feel they should be
allowed to park on the road. He said the cars are parking within one foot of a fire hydrant and
that is a problem. He said the cars could park off the shoulder of the road and a retaining wall
put in.
Sansevere asked Gay if Gappa’s proposal would work.
Gay said it might be possible to get two cars parked off of the road, but he does not feel there
should be any parking on the road. He said there should be off-road parking for the lots that
are not owned by neighborhood residents.
Donald Miegel, 683 Sullivan Drive, Columbia Heights, said he owns one of the lots. He said
they started parking on County Road 19 because some of the neighbors said they didn’t like
him driving on the slip road. He said it is difficult to drive down by the slip because the road is
grass and dirt. He rarely has more than one car there. He said the grass is mowed by the slips
on the north end, but not the south end and the slip road is barely wide enough for a car. He
would like to park by his slip, but if they bring two cars, there isn’t enough room. He said if
they bring a lot of people out, he picks them up someplace else.
Sansevere asked if the City could widen the road for their access.
Jabbour said it is private property. He said that use of the land is different based on people’s
life styles. He said there is no obligation on the City’s part to see that everyone’s life style is
accommodated. Just because someone has two cars does not mean the City has to provide
parking for two cars.
Kelley said his understanding is that there is a covenant in place that allows whoever owns the
lots to do whatever they want on this piece of property. They are allowed to park one car and
there should be no parking on County Road 19. He feels the City Council is caught between
the neighbors and the users of the docks
Sansevere agreed with Kelley. He said the first priority should be safety. He said if restricting
parking on County Road 19 would prohibit the dock lot owners from getting to their boats, he
would be fighting harder to find another option, but they do have access and he is comfortable
with the resolution the way it stands
Page 10
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
(»S) RECONSIDERATION OF "NO PARKING** SIGNS ON SHADYWOOD ROAD -
Continued
Peterson and Flint agreed with Sansevere.
Tom Huber, 2650 Shadywood Road, said he carmot get his vehicle by the cars that park there.
He said he drives up over the hill. He said they try to keep the property clean. He said in the
past Jeanne Mabusth told him that parking would always be allowed on County Road 19. He
said someone has actually put orange traffic cones down there to prevent cars from driving
through.
Jabbour said he feels the dock lot owners have to work together to figure out how to get in
and out of the property.
Zimmerman said it sounds like the issue is there is concern on their part that the access be
clear. He would be comfortable making sure that it is clear. He said he hasn’t seen anyone try
to bar access to the property.
Jabbour said there has to be an ingress and egress and that the owners should work on it
together.
Sansevere asked what brought this matter up again.
Gappa said the non-resident owners were concerned about having adequate parking and
contacted him about it. He said the conservative approach is not to allow any parking on
County Road 19.
Sansevere suggested that the non-resident and residents owners work together to co-exist.
No action was taken on this item.
Break 9:15 - 9:22 p.m.
(•#9) REVISE ASSESSMENT ROLL ON NAVARRE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
UPGRADE
A. DECLARE COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDER PREPARATION OF
REVISED ASSESSMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 4346
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4346 Declaring Cost to be
Assessed and Order Preparation of Revised Proposed Assessment for Navarre Water
Treatment Plant Rehabilitation. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Page 11
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
(*U9) REVISE ASSESSMENT ROLL ON NA VARRE WA TER TREA TMENT PLANT
UPGRADE - Continued
B. SCHEDULE ASSESSMENT HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 4347
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4347 for Hearing on
Revised Proposed Assessment Navarre Water Treatment Plan Rehabilitation Project.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#10) CHANGE ORDER #1 AND REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT - LIFT
STATION #13 REHABILITATION
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Change Order #1, to GHT Construction
for increased costs for site restoration in the amo.'int of $1,391.00. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays
0.
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Request for Final Payment, to GHT
Construction in the amount of $5,504.00. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#11) APPROVE PROPOSAL FOR COUNTY ROAD 15/51 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
WARRANT STUDY
Moorse said this item is a follow-up to the County Road 1 5 traffic study, which suggested a
semaphore at the 1 5 and 51 intersection. Detailed traffic counts must be completed and a
signal justification report completed before a traffic signal can be installed. This is a proposal
from Bonestroo for completion of a signal justification report.
Jabbour said this will be a very emotional issue. He said this is one of many, many issues from
the traffic study for the County Road 15 corridor.
Sansevere said one resident called him and asked that the Council place a moratorium on this
issue until after Highway 12 is done to see if there is a need for a light at that time.
Flint said he talked with the same resident, Fred Puzak, who lives in that area. He said getting
onto 15 in the morning is not a problem because there is a pulse in the traffic caused by the
light in Navarre His concern is coming back in the evening because the traffic is solid and just
crawls along.
Kelley said that recently in the evenings, 15 has been backed up all the way to 394. He feels a
light will probably make it worse.
Jabbour said he told Mr Puzak that the City Council is very aware of the intensity of traffic
and the limitations of County Road 15. As a result, the Council is trying to provide alternative
routes to County Road 15 in every segment of its planning, including the Highway 12 design.
Page 12
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
(UII) APPROVE PROPOSAL FOR COUNTY ROAD I S/ST TRAFFIC SIGNAL
WARRANT STUD Y - Continued
Jabbour asked about the traffic counts on County Roads 19 and 15.
Gappa said at the County Road 15/19 intersection, the traffic count on County Road 15 is
17,000 vehicles per day and 13,000 vehicles per day on 19.
Jabbour indicated there are 24,500 vehicles per day on County Road 15 at Orono Orchard
Road, so there is an increase of about 7,000 vehicles per day between County Road 19 and
Orono Orchard Road.
Moorse said that what the engineer said in the study is that even though there is a stop light at
15 and 19 that stops traffic, when you get a half mile away from that and there is traffic
coming on all the way, whatever gap that is created at that stop light a half mile away has
disappeared by the time you get to the County Road 15/51 mtersection.
Kelley said he is not in favor of completing the signal justification report.
Peterson agreed with Kelley.
Flint said there are questions in his mind as to whether the report is necessary.
Kelley said there has been enough work done on County Road 15 recently and the Council
should wait and see how it goes.
No action was taken on this item
(*#12) JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH METRO TRANSIT
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Joint Powers Agreement between the
Metropolitan Council and the City of Orono for the installation, replacement and
maintenance of bus stop signs. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#I3) REQUEST PERMISSION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR WELL #1
REPAIR
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to authorize preparation of plans and specifications
and advertising for bids for the repair of well number one for the Navarre water system.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Page 13
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
(•#14) ADOPT 2000 TAX LEVY AND BUDGET - RESOLUTION NO. 4348 and 4349
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4348 Adopting the
Proposed 1999 Tax Levy Collectible in 2000. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4349 Approving the
Proposed 2000 Budget. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#15) SET DATE FOR TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to set the initial Truth in Taxation public hearing for
7:00 p.m., Monday, December 6,1999 at the Orono Council Chambers, and to set the
continuation hearing, if required, for 7:00 p.m., Monday, December 13,1999 at the
Orono Council Chambers. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#16) SET DATE FOR TAX RATE HEARING
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to schedule a public hearing regarding the City’s tax
rate for 7:00 p.m. on Monday, October 11,1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#17) RESIGNATION OF KRISTINE JENSON FROM THE ASSISTANT ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR POSITION
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to accept the resignation of Kristine Jenson from the
position of Assistant Zoning Administrator effective September 10, 1999. VOTE: Ayes
5, Nays 0.
(*#18) APPOINTMENT OF WENDY BOTTENBERG TO ASSISTANT ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR POSITION
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to appoint Wendy Bottenberg to the position of
Assistant Zoning Administrator at the Level 6, Step 1 salary of S30,851, effective
September 14, 1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#19) PUBLIC WORKS LAND ACQUISITION OPTIONS
Moorse said that the City has a need for additional land for Public Works-related activities,
particularly a brush disposal site and a leaf composting site. The Council recently directed staff
to obtain an appraisal on a 12-acre portion of the property located just east of the City’s
Public Works facility. The cost of the 12 acres was substantially higher than the Council was
willing to spend. He said that staff has now developed a set of options for consideration by the
Council Moorse revie wed the options which are to purchase a 3 4 acre parcel of land to the
east of the Public Works facility, purchase land from the Orono School District to the north
Page 14
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
(U19) PUBLIC WORKS LAND A CQUISITION OPTIONS - Continued
and east of the City Public Works facilities, fill the existing wetland that is just west of the
Public Works yard area, or use City-owned land adjacent to McCulley Road for a brush
disposal site and leaf compost site. He said that Staff recommends pursuing the options that
are adjacent to the City’s current facilities rather than having a satellite facility on McCulley
Road. It would be difficult to maintain the security of that property and the site would have to
be at least partially fenced and gated. Staff would like to explore purchasing the land to the
east of the Public Works facility and the school property. He said the property to the east is
difficult for the current property owners to use because they can’t get access to it because of
wetlands. It is guided for medium density residential and the homes could be located directly
adjacent to the existing Public Works site. If the City purchases the property, it would provide
a buffer for the neighbors from the busier existing Public Works facility and give the City an
opportunity to expand its site.
Sansevere asked if Moorse knows the asking price of the land.
Moorse said staff knows what the owner is asking for the 12-acre portion, but not the smaller
area.
Sansevere asked if the City-owned wetland area, was not wet, would it be sufficient room for
the site.
Moorse said it yes, it would be sufficient room for a brush site and a compost site, but once
that land is used, there is no other City property available.
Kelley said he is in favor of trying to acquire additional property.
Peterson, Sansevere, and Flint agreed.
Moorse asked if that included approaching the school district.
Kelley said no. He feels the school district has other projects to consider right now.
Jabbour told Moorse to pursue option 1 and keep option 2 on stand by.
Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to direct staff to further pursue Option 1, keeping
Option 2 on standby, and to report staffs findings to the Council. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays
0.
(*#20) MATCHING OF PRIVATE DONATIONS FOR POLICE SQUAD VIDEO
CAMERAS
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to authorize the use of General Fund surplus funds
for the purchase of in-squad video cameras. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Page 15
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
Moorse reminded the Council members that there will be a housing workshop on Thursday,
September 23, 7:30 a.m., at the Shorewood Senior Community Center.
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
None.
(*#21) UCENSES
ONE DAY GAMBLING - RESOLUTION NO. 4350
Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc.
Sunday, January 23,2000
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4350 Approving the
Application of Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc. for a One Day Off-Site Gambling Permit.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT RENEWAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4351
Minnesota Multiple Sclerosis Society
Jimmies Lounge
3380 Shoreline Drive
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve a Resolution No. 4351 Granting Renewal
of Gambling Premises Permit for Jimmies Lounge Located at 3380 Shoreline Drive.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, a motion to approve the following licenses:
HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE
Allstar Electric (Electric)
Ben Meinhardt
3585 Sixth Avenue North
Long Lake, MN 55356
Guardsman Wood Pro (Furniture Repair)
Bruce Mathison
5 Brown Road South
Long Lake, MN 55356
Page 16
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13,1999
(*92I) LICENSES - Continued
L^. Pilgram, D.C. (Chiropractic Office)
LeRoy A. Pilgram, D.C.
1795 Shadywood Road
Navarre, MN 55392
VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#22) BILLS
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT
Jabbour moved, Sansevere seconded, a motion to adjourn the meeting at 9:50 p.m.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Na>s 0.
ATTEST;
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Page 17
^ .
Application Date:
Completion Date:
Deadline Date:
April 21,1999
April 21,1999
October 18,1999
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 2 7 1999
CITY OF OHOrwU
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: 9/23/99
ITEM NO.: 3
Department Approval:
Name Paul Weinberger
Title Zoning Administrator/Planner
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2492 Rick and Gail Luzaich
2490 Old Beach Road
Variances and Conditional Use Permit
Zoning District: LR-IB
Lot Area:55,215
One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre)
square feet (1,27 acre)_______________________
Attachments
A Resolution
B City Forestry Consultant Recommendation - Peter Bedker PhD. (August 19, 1999)
C Revised Restoration Plan - (August 19, 1999)
D1-D4 Hardcover Calculation Worksheets
E Bedker PhD. Site Analysis Report - (June 16, 1999)
F Bedker PhD. - (July 15, 1999)
G Bedker PhD. - (July 25, 1999)
H Tree Removal Survey
1 Previous Restoration Plan (July 21,1999) Review by Council
J Planning Commission Minutes (May 17, 1999)
K Planning Commission Minutes (June 21, 1999)
L City Council Minutes (July 12, 1999)
Summar}’: A revised restoration plan (please refer to Exhibit C), dated August 19,1999, has been
reviewed by Peter Bedker, PhD. In his comments (Exhibit B), dated August 19, 1999, he has
recommended the restoration plan be adopted by the City. The plan has removed two trees that were
located near the far property lines and relocated them closer to the center of the property. This plan
has not eliminated any trees that did appear on a previous plan, however it has increased the spacing
and will achieve 90% canopy coverage within the 25 year restoration period as recommended by Dr.
Bedker.
2" average diameter trees will be planted in the locations indicated on the most revised restoration
plan. Dr. Bedker has indicated this size tree will likely be successfol in achieving stability within
two years of planting. Restoration of the site shall begin no later than Spring, 2000. The City
Attorney has recommended executing a contract or Restoration Agreement with the property owners
giving the City rights to inspect the property following restoration planting and annual site
inspections for a period of 6-8 years. The purpose of the site inspections is to ensure a successful
restoration program and ensure the bluff is not subject to any erosion problems.
Hardcover and Shoreland Land Alteration
The original landscaping plan submitted by the applicants had indicated a series of retaining walls
and extensive land alteration. Based on recommendations by the City Engineer and Planning
Commission the retaining walls and land alteration were mostly eliminated from the plan. The only
hardcover and grading would occur at the base of the proposed stairway. However it would be
located within 75' of the lakeshore requiring a variance for hardcover and a conditional use permit
for grading. The amount of hardcover and grading is minimal and only enough to stabilize the base
of the stairway.
A summary of the existing and proposed hardcover on the lot are attached to this memo as Exhibits
D1-D4. The additional hardcover within 75' of the lake are a result of 50 s.f for the retaining walls.
The Shoreland Ordinance allows stairways as a preferred alternative to major topographic alterations
for achieving access up and down bluffs and steep slopes to shore areas. The applicants have
proposed a stairway 5' wide, however the Ordinance only allows stairways 4' in width. Staff is
recommending the proposed stairway be reduced V to comply with the oidinance and decrease
potential hardcover on the property.
This application requires the following variances:
1. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover and
Land Alteration Regulations: Within 75 feet of the shoreline (929.4') there shall be no
e.xcavating, filling, hardcover, temporary or permanent structures. Within 75 to 250 feet of
the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. Within 250 to 500 feet of the
shoreline there shall be no greater than 30% hardcover. The proposed plan would increase
the amount of hardcover in the 0-75' setback from 60 s.f. (0.5%) to 200 s.t. (1.5%) to allow
a series of retain walls along the bluff. The amount of hardcover would also slightly increase
within the 75-250 ’ setback. No variance is required as the total hardcover would be 24.4%.
This application requires the follow ing Conditional Use Permit:
1.Section 10.03, Subdivision 19: A Conditional Use Permit is required to allow the grading
and placement of retaining walls within the lakeshore setback. Vegetation must be made
available to adequately screen structures, including buildings and retaining walls, from public
waters. The proposal would slightly modify the natural grade within the 75' lakeshore
setback, requiring a Conditional Use Permit.
Pertinent Ordinances
1.
2.
Section 10.22, Subdivision 3 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (1) (1): Tree Removal
Regulations: No live tree within 75 feet of the shoreline with a diameter of six inches or
more shall be removed without first obtaining a permit jfrom the City. Such permits shall be
issued by the City staff provided that at least a like number of replacement trees of a size and
nature found acceptable to the staff are planted, any question involving the number of trees
to be replaced will require approval.
Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(1) (2): Intensive Vegetation Clearing: Intensive vegetation
clearing within 75 feet of the shoreline and on steep slopes within the Shoreland Overlay
District is prohibited. Limited clearing of shrubs and trees less than 6 inches in diameter and
cutting, pruning and trimming of trees of any size is allowed to provide a view to the water
from the principal dwelling site and to accommodate the placement of permitted stairways
and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted
lock boxes, provided that the screening of structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed
from the water, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions, is not substantially reduced.
Issues fonDiscussion
1.
2.
The vegetation proposed is consistent with the types that were removed without obtaining
a permit and are compatible with the vegetation on surrounding properties. The Code
states no live tree within 75 feet of the shoreline with a diameter of six inches or more
shall be removed without first obtaining a permit from the City. A requirement of the
permit is at least a like number of replacement trees of a size and nature found acceptable
to the Staff, Planning Commission and City Council be planted.
The landscape plan has addressed tree replacement criteria as described in the attached
recommendations by Dr. Bedker.
3.
4.
The majority of the plantings within the slope are smaller shrub style plantings. A few
mature trees have been placed near the center of the property to screen the residence from
public water view.
The applicants have provided revised hardcover calculations for the 75-250' lakeshore
setback and the 250-500' lakeshore setback that denionstrate no variances are required
within the two setback zones.
Staff Recommendation
To approve variances and a conditional use permit based on the following conditions:
1.Properly owners and City of Orono enter into a Restoration Agreement allowing Staff to
enter the property and conduct an initial inspection following restoration planting and
additional aimual inspections for six consecutive years following restoration. The
purpose of the site inspections is to ensure a successful restoration program and ensure
the bluff is not subject to any erosion problems.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Property owners apply for a land alteration permit and building permit for the
construction of the stairway, retaining walls and grading on the property.
Any amendments to the restoration plan may require further Planning Commission and
City Council review.
The trees shall be planted to the size and types indicated on the most revised site plan,
dated August 19, 1999.
Tree restoration shall be complete no later than June 15,2000.
Erosion control measures shall remain in place until restoration is complete and Staff
authorizes removal.
The Agreement shall continue with the property upon any future sale while subject to the
Restoration Agreement.
8. The applicant reduces the width of the proposed stairv- ay from 5' to 4',
A
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES PER
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2
AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (1) AND
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19
FILE NO. 2492
WHEREAS, Rick and Gail Luzaich (hereinafter the "applicants") are owners of
a property located at 2490 Old Beach Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City"); and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning
Commission held public hearings on May 17, 1999 and June 21, 1999, at which times all persons
desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit a
retaining wall to stabilize a stairway located on a steep slope for the purposes of lake access within
the 0-75' lakeshore setback to allow 210 s.f. (1.5%) hardcover where 60 s.f. (0.5%) exists and
none (0%) is allowed; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a conditional use permit to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to allow grading and construction of a
retaining wall within 75’ of the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of Lake Minnetonka.
Minnesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
FINDINGS
1.
2.
This application was »■€ viewed as Zoning File ^2492.
The Comprehensive Plan addresses the issue of maintaining a natural appearance
along lakeshore properties. The Plan states minimum green belts will be provided
with prohibitations against clearcutting or e.xcessive thinning of vegetation. Natural
Page I of 7
5.
vegetation will be preserved on slopes. Retaining walls will be discouraged except
when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened
with natural vegetation.
The City of Orono Staff was notified extensive tree removal had occurred on the
property without obtaining a permit, and a stop work order was issued to the
property owners.
A total of approximately 17 trees of greater than 6" in diameter had been removed
from the property within the 75' lakeshore setback area and on a steep slope. The
Orono Zoning Code slates I'O live tree within 75 feet of the shoreline with a diameter
of six inches or more shall be icmoved without first obtaining a permit from the City.
Such permits shall be issued by the City staff provided that at least a like number of
replacement trees of a size and nature found acceptable to the staff are planted, any
question involving the number of trees to be replaced will require approval.
Intensive vegetation clearing within 75 feet of the shoreline and on steep slopes
within the Shoreland Overlay District is prohibited. Limited clearing of shrubs and
trees less than 6 inches in diameter and cutting, pruning and trimming of trees of any
size is allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling site and to
accommodate the placement of permitted stairways and landings, picnic areas, access
paths, beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted lock boxes, provided that the
screening of structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed from the water,
assuming summer, leaf-on conditions, is not substantially reduced.
The property was clearcut leaving no natural appearance to the shoreland area and
it is the position of the Council the conditions on the property resulted in the visual
appearance of the property had been more than substantially reduced.
The City of Orono retained Peter Bedker, PhD., a coiv;iUiing forester, to review
the property and recommend parameters for restoratio:: of the site. His
recommendations were:
A. The value of the trees removed is estimated at $48,100 using standardized
appraisal methods.
Page 2 of 7
B
C.
D.
29 trees of 2-inch caliper (maples and lindens with a few red oaks) on a 25'
average spacing would repla(.e the 14,450 s.f. lost canopy in a period of 20-
25 years. Spacing should be staggered to provide a natural appearance.
Larger trees could be placed at the top of the slope to soften and obscure
the roofline of the existing residence as viewed from the lake.
The majority of the existing stumps and root systems should remain in place
to stabilize the slope.
8.
9.
E. Planting with the slopes must be done in a manner to avoid soil disturbance.
A small amount of grading will occur at the base of the stairway to stabilize the
retaining walls and stairway.
Stairways are permitted within the shore setback zone to allow easier access to the
lakeshore along steep slopes and bluffs. The proposed stairway as shown in the
plan is 5 feet in width, however the maximum width allowed by code is 4 feet. No
hardship has been demonstrated that would allow a stairway to exceed 4 feet in
width.
10. The property owners and City will enter into a Restoration Agreement that will
ensure successful vegetation restoration to the property and protect the slope from
erosion.
11 . The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and
do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the
variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire
hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship
or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant;
and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
12. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow a retaining
Page 3 of 7
13.
wall and grading within the 75’ lakeshore setback will not be detrimental to the
health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air
nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will its use
depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the
property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by
the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56,
Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit a retaining wall to stabilize a stairway located on a steep slope
for the purposes of lake access within the 0-75' lakeshore setback to allow 210 s.f. (1.5%)
hardcover where 60 s.f. (0.5%) exists and none (0%) is allowed and grants a conditional use
permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to allow grading and
construction of a retaining wall within 75' of the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of Lake
Minnetonka. Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1.
2.
3.
Property owners and City of Orono enter into a Restoration Agreement as drafted by
the City Attorney and agreed to by the property owners allowing Staff to enter the
propeny and conduct an initial inspection following restoration planting and
additional annual inspections for six consecutive years following restoration. The
purpose of the site inspections is to ensure a successful restoration program and
ensure the bluff is not subject to any erosion problems.
Property owners apply for a land alteration permit and building permit for the
construction of the stairway, retaining walls and grading on the property.
Any amendments to the restoration plan may require further Planning Commission
and City Council review.
Page 4 of 7
4.
5.
6.
7.
9.
10.
The trees shall hr planted to the size and types indicated on the most revised site
plan, dated August 19. 1999.
Tree restoration shall be complete no later than June 15,2000.
Erosion control measures shall remain in place until restoration is complete and Staff
authorizes removal.
The Agreement shall continue with the property upon any future sale while subject
to the Restoration Agreement.
8. The applicant reduces the width of the proposed stairway from 5' to 4'.
Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but
are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit
within one year of the date of Council's approval, or the special conditions of this
resolution will expire on that date (September 27, 2(XX)).
Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conaitk’fis ji this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
11. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of
this resolution and on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to
the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Page 5 o: 7
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Property Owners
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of
September, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 6 of 7
SEP 10 1999 14:21 FR HIHSHfiU CULBERTSON S12 334 8SS3 TO 9-2494616 75i0_4 P.05/10
ORMt City of Orono
Document Form
Revised 11/94
CITY OF ORONO
HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA
RESTORATION AGREEMENT FOR
Gail Luziach
Need address; legal description.
(Site Location)
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of
by and between the City of Orono, a municipal corporation organized under the
laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter called "City"), and _
their heirs, successors and assigns (hereinafter called "Owners").
WITNESSETH;
WHEREAS, Owner caused certain trees and shrubs to be removed from the lake side
of their property; and
WHEREAS, Owner has applied for a conditional use permit from the City for the
purpose of restoring the property in a way which is mutually acceptable to the City and
Ow'ner; and
WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the Plan and consulted the City Forester;and
WHEREAS, as one of the Conditions of the Conditional Use Permit, the City will
require that this Restoration Agreement be filed against the title to the property;
032/22131912 9/10/99
Page 1 of 6
Initials of Owners
Initials of City Clerk
SEP 10 1999 14:21 FR HINSHPU CULEERTSOM 612 334 SSSS TO 9-2494616-732031 P.06/10 ‘
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Property Description:
2. Improvements: In accordance with the policies and ordinances of the City, the private
improvements (hereinafter collectively called the "Improvements") shall be constructed
and installed on the terms and conditions hereinafter contained: Such improvements
arc attached hereto as Exhibit A.
3. Installation of Improvements:
A. Commencement Date - The installation of Improvements shall begin no later
than____________________________________.
B. Completion Date - All Improvements shall be completed no later than
4.
C. Contractors - Owner shall select, retain and supervise the Contractor(s)
responsible for Improvement installation. The City reserves the right to require
satisfactory proof of successful experience and adequate financial stams of any
such contractor. Where required by City ordinance, the contractor shall first
obtain a license from the City.
D. Pre Installation Conference - Prior to the start of any installation, the Owner
and the Owner’s Contractor shall meet with the responsible City official to
review installation plans and schedules.
E. Permits - Prior to the start of any installation, the Owners’ Contractor shall
apply for and receive all necessary permits from the City and/or government
agencies having jurisdiction.
F. Installation - The installation and materials shall be in accordance with the
plans and specifications approved by the city.
G. Insurcjice - The Owners will cause each person who installs any Improvement
to maintain complete insurance coverage including Workmens’ Compensation,
Liability and Property Damage.
Entry and Inspection: Owner agrees to allow the City to inspect the property once a
year in order to determine that restoration plan set out in Exhibit A has been carried
out, and in order to determine whether any the vegetation required by the restoration
plan needs to be replaced because it has died or failed to thrive.
0«2/221819l2 9/10/-99
Page 2 of 6 Initials of Owners
Initials of City Clerk
SEP 10 1999 145 21 FR HIMSHhI.1 CULEERTSOM bl2 334 8SS3 'j 9-2494818-752031 P.07/10
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Term of Inspection and Enforcement: City may continue to notice and cany out an
inspection of the property until each of the trees planted pursuant to the restoration
plan have reached six inches in diameter at a distance of three feet from the ground.
Agreement to Replace: Owner agrees to replace at Owner’s sole expense any
vegetation required by the restoration plan, which the City reasonably determines has
died or failed to thrive.
Agreement Regarding Enforcement; Owner agrees that the City may seek injunctive
relief for the enforcement of this order from the District Court. Owner further agrees
that it will be liable for the City’s reasonable attorneys fees and costs in litigation
brought to enforce this agreement, if the City prevails in any such litigation.
Fees and Expenses: The Owners agree to pay all Ciw fees required per the current
City Fee Schedule and funher agree to completely reimburse the City for all the
variable additional expenses it incurs in regard to the review and approval of the
Improvements including, but not limited to, direct Cit>' payroll and overhead, costs and
fees paid to consultants and other professionals.
Resolutions of Citv: The Owners agree to be bound by the provisions set forth in all
resolutions of the City Council in relation to the Improvements.
Binding Effect: The terms and provi.sions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto
and shall be binding deemed covenants running with the land. References herein to
Ow'ners, if there be more than one, shall mean each ar.d all of them. This agreement
to be executed by the Owners, shall be placed of record so as to give notice hereof to
subsequent purchasers and encumbrancers of all or any part of the subdivision and all
recording fees, if any, shall be paid by the Owner.
Notices: ^Tienever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or
demand be given or served by party to this agreement to or on the other party,
such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States
certified mail (return receipt requested) to the address set forth below. Such notice or
demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in
the mail in accordance with the above.
Notice to the Citv
City or Orono
Clerk/Administrator
PO Box 66
Ciystal Bay. MN 55323
Notice to the Developer
032/'22l81912 9/I0i''99
Pzgi 3 of 6 Initials of Owners
Initials of City Clerk
SEP 10 1999 14S21 FP HINSHh U CLILBERTSOM 612 334 S3S3 TO 9-24?4t>16 7T20jl P.03-'10
12. Tneomoraticn bv Reference; All plans, special provisions, proposals, specifications
and contracts for the Improvements furnished and lot pursuant to this agreement shall
be and hereby are made a part of this agreement by reference as fully as if set out
herein in full.
13. Disclaimer bv Citv: It is understood and agreed that the City, the City Council aaid
the agents and employees of the City shall not be personally liable or responsible in
any manner to the Owner or Owners’ contractors, subcontractors, materialmen,
laborers or any other person, furm or corporation, for any debt, claim, demand,
damages, actions or causes of action of any kind or character, arising out of or by
reason of the execution of this agreement or the performance and completion of the
Improvements.
14. Hold Harmless and Indemnification: The Owners shall indemnify and hold harmless
the City, the City Council and the agents and employees of the City from and against
all claims, damages, losses or expenses, including attorney fees, which the City, City
Council and agents and employees of the City may suffer or for which it may be held
liable, arising out of or resulting from the a.ssertion against them of any claims, debts
or obligations in consequence of the performance of this agreement by the Owners,
their employees, agents or subcontractors, whether or not caused in part by a party
indemnified hereunder.
15. Remedy for Default: Default by tlic Owners of any of the terms of this agreement
shall automatically result in the suspension or withholding of all permits, licenses,
occupancy cert Ticates or other authorizations issued by the City in connection with the
property.
A. The Owners hereby grant to the City, its agents and its employees, the right to
enter on the property for the specific purpose of completing any and all of the
agreed upon Improvements should the Owners not complete those
Improvements by the date specified in Section 3-B.
B. The remedies afforded to the City under this Section shall be in addition to any
other remedies to which the City' may be entitled by law or other agreement.
IN V-TTNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Owners have caused this agreement to be
duly c.xecuted on the day and year first above written;
CITY OF ORONO
By;By:
(Mayor)(City Clerk)
0?2/22:8WU
Page 4 of 6
Initials of Owners
Initials of City Clerk
SEP 10 1993 14:22 FR HINSHhU CULBERTSON S12 334 S888 TO 9-2494616-752031 P.09/10
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me on this
__________________, 19 ___, by --------------------------------------
day of
and
___________________ __ Mayor and City Qerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
OWNERS
By; ____And:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) 5S.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of .. 19.before me a Notary' Public
_____ knownwithin and for said county, personally appeared
to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of_19 ___, before me a Notary Public
_____________________knownwithin and for said county, personally appeared ______________________________
to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
082.';21819I2 9/10/99
Pege 3 of 6
SEP 10 1999 14:22 FR HINSHAU CULBERTSOtl 612 334 S3SS TO 9-2494616-752031 P.10/10
• • t
Notary Public
Reviewed for Administration:
Date:By:
(City Official)
This document has been drafted by:
Hinshaw & Culbertson
Suite 3100
Piper Jaffray Tower
222 South Ninth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
08xa2I8I9I2 9/10/99
Page 6 of 6
*♦ total FmGE. 10 *■*
From Peter J Bedker To Paul Weinberger Date 8/19/99 Time 10 07 38 AM Page 2 of 2
Treescapes
("oM.iminit • I'nn-sti’y Consultants
121-I Th;!il \\L'niiL‘\E
Qutl.ilo MiimcsoU) S>3 1 3
B
(612) 682-9362
Voice A Fax
August 19.1999
Paul Weinberger
City of Orono
2750 Kelly Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
RE: Review of Revised (8/1^i99) Planting Plan for R. Luiaich Residence
2490 Old Beach Road, Orono, MN
Application #2492
Dear Mr. Weinberger;
Yesterday Mr. fvlueller and l bad a phone conversation regarding changes needed to Ills planting plan for
the R. Luzaich residence at 2490 Old Beach Road for it to represent a full restoration plan under the
guidelines that outlined m my report to you of June 16,1999 and my letter to Mr, Mueller of July 15,1999. I
told him that the only femaining concern that I had was that his proposed plan with trees in their currant
locations only would restoie 82% of the estimated tree canopy that was removed within the 25 year
restoration period.
In addition, I suggested that by taking rwo trees that were largely redundant in the proposed plan because
the contributed very litt'e additional canopy cover and move them out toward the center of the property that
approximately 90% canopy restoration could be achieved. This morning Mr. Mueller faxed me a revised
planting plan wita tfese suggested changes.
As a result 1 am willing to recommend to you without hesitation, that this planting plan be adopted as a full
restoration plan under the guide nes that 1 set forth in the above referenced letters to you and Mr. Mueller.
Please give me a call if you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance.
Consulting Community Forester
cc: Gary Mueller
Plain Hcallh C arc ijcv V.maL’eincni i’lar,';i ret Iii\cnu>i:tN Ka/2Tvl Tree Aisetxsnienu
(y
O
9
Cu»
X
Ioz
fl
<nc:o
Arn
mo
c
9
>r
Ti
>
r
«»n
n
>
K>
o
I
I
(A
>
o
<An
o
u>
H
>
0
1o
z
(A
Cc
►o
oo
B
>
O
>z
H
(A
cr
<C
>n
i>
M
nos
D
►
S
O
>z
CP
ri
JO
JO
<
¥-•
CP
C
>0z(
>45<P o o*(P P
►(A -■*T >A 41
<ro I IP T >1'IPcCP>o f'IP C>O
JO CP o 1 H r >0 )»n CP z rp O <£;o f"<o o >>o o r ><0
TJr
c.r $Qr
rp
o o z >u
f
rprvztAO>CP (P r‘
*0 w*ri (P r ►IP
rt rp ►(A
3D <O lA
>7\o 41 om(P ►orpo(P QJIB1;«<
jp-<H
>
fl
H
>
Q
ri
$
X
H
ft
JOo
T
O
O
<
oz
z
>
<
IB
“0r
>z
H
tP
O
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Rick and Gail Luzaich Property
2490 Old Beach Road
Orono, Minnesota 55391
Revised August 19,1999
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Dl
0’ - 75'
A Concrete Masomy Unit Stainvay 1.5 Ftx40 Ft 60 Sq Ft
A Total Hardcover in Zone Computer Measured 60 Sq Ft
B Total Property in Zone Computer Measured 13,690 Sq Ft
Percent 0.5
Percent Desired 0
Set Back Zone ..........................................................75’ - 250'
A Concrete Masonry Unit Stairway 1.5 Ft X 40 Ft 60 Sq Ft
A House/ Garage Computer Measured 4,795 Sq Ft
A Concrete Walk/Porch Computer Measured 400 Sq Ft
A Concrete Patio Computer Measured 655 Sq Ft
A Concrete Driveway/Curb Computer Measured 2,130 Sq Ft
A Rock Mulch Planting Beds Computer Measured 1 2,415 Sq Ft]
A Total Hardcover in Zone Computer Measured 10,455 Sq Ft
B Total Property in Zone Computer Measured 33,510 Sq Ft
Percent 31
Percent Desired 25 Maximum
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Rick and Gail Luzaich Property
2490 Old Beach Road
Orono, Minnesota 55391
Revised August 19,1999
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Page 2 of 2
Ca# t ................ 250' - 500'E
A Sport Court/Retaining Walls 35 Ftx65 Ft Court 2,415 Sq Ft.
A Concrete Driveway/Curb Computer Measured 2,565 Sq Ft
A Rock Mulch Planting Beds Computer Measured 1,000 Sq Ft
A Total Hardcover in Zone Computer Measured 5,980 Sq Ft
B Total Property in Zone Computer Measured 39,385 Sq Ft
Percent
Percent Desired
15
30 Maximum
PZ
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Rick and Gail Luzaich Property
2490 Old Beach Road
Orono, Minnesota 55391
Revised August 19,1999
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Page 2 of2
Set Back Zone..................................................... 250’ - 500 ’
A Sport Court/Retaining Walls 35 Ft X 65 Ft Court 2,415 Sq Ft
A Concrete Driveway/Curb Computer Measured 2,565 Sq Ft
A Rock Mulch Planting Beds Computer Measured 1,000 Sq Ft
A Total Hardcover in Zone Computer Measured 5,980 Sq Ft
B Total Property in Zone Computer Measured 39,385 Sq Ft
Percent 15
Percent Desired 30 Maximum
1 »
03
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Rick and Gail Luzaich Property
2490 Old Beach Road
Orono, Minnesota 55391
Revised August 19,1999
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
Co# Rdplr 7nno ................................................................................................................................................................___0' - 75 ’
A Concrete Stairway 5Flx40 Ft 200 Sq Ft
A CMU Retaining Wall 50 Lin Ft 50 Sq Ft
A Total Hardcover in Zone Computer Measured 250 Sq Ft
B Total Property in Zone Computer Measured 13,690 Sq Ft
Percent 2
Percent Change 1.5 Increase
Co# Xaha
•
... 75 ’ - 250’
A Concrete Stairway 5 Ft X 40 Ft 200 Sq Ft
A House/ Garage Computer Measured 4,795 Sq Ft
A Concrete Walk/Porch Computer Measured 400 Sq Ft
A Concrete Patio Computer Measured 655 Sq Ft
A Concrete Driveway/Curb Computer Measured 2,130 Sq Ft
A Rock Mulch Planting Beds Computer Measured (2.415 So Ftl
A Total Hardcover in Zone Computer Measured 10,595 Sq Ft
B Total Property in Zone Computer Measured 33,510 Sq Ft
Percent
Percent Change 1.0 Increase
D5
75'
Ft
Ft
iFt
iFt
2
ase
9:
n
50'
iFt
I Ft
iFt
iFt
iFt
na
,Fi
q Ft
tzse
ER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
:k and Gail Luzaich Property
2490 Old Beach Road
Orono, Minnesota 55391
Revised August 19,1999
ROPOSED CONDITIONS
Page 2 of 2
................................................ 250’ - 500'
35 Ft X 65 Ft Court 2,415 Sq Ft
Computer Measured
•
2,565 Sq Ft
Computer Measured 1,000 Sq Ft
Computer Measured 5,980 Sq Ft
Computer Measured 39,385 Sq Ft
Percent 15
Percent Change 0
From Peter J Bedker To Mike Gaffron Date 6/17/99 Time 11 23 CC i.M
Treescapes
'C^ummuful^ f^oreei^ ConsulLAnls
•214 Tlurd Avenue NE
Buflalo, Minnesota S5313
Page 2 of 5
B
(612)682-4562
Voice & ^u^
DATE:
TO;
FROM:
RE:
June 16,1999
Paul Weinberger
Assistant Zoning Administrator
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066
Peter J. Bedker.-Ph.D.
Consulting Community Forester
Luzaich Restoration Plan Parameters
2490 Old Beach Road
Application #2492
The following are parameters that should be used to design and evaluate restoration plans for the Luzaich
residence at 2490 Old Beach Road. They were prepared to meet your stated desire objectives to restore
the lakeshore to wooded, natural appearing landscape in as short of time as oossible. These parameters
were developed at your request and are based on on-site observations and measurements made June 9,
1999 and June 14,1999.
Observations and Background
The April 19,1999 survey {Coffin & Gronberg. Inc) of the property identified a total of 16 trees with stump
diameters of 12 inches or greater that were removed from the rear (lake side) of the residence On-site
investigations identified an American linden stump (21 inch diameter) located 32.5 feet northeast of the
northeast corner of the Luzaich residence that was not indicated on the survey Species composition of
canopy trees was as follows: 47% sugar mapie (Acer saccharum). 47% Anrierican linden (Tillia americana)
and 6% northern red oak (Quercus rubra) Understory trees included sapling and seedlings of these
species as well as ironwood (Osfrya virginiana) and American elm (Ulmus americana).
The trees removed v;erc ^ remnant of a mature sugar maple - basswood forest The height of remaining
trees on adjacent properties to the are 80 to 85 feet
Tree diameters at 4 5 feet above the ground (DBH) were estimated based oi measurements of stump
height and diameters. An estimated 6,950 in^ of cross-sectional area of trees were removed. The total
value of the trees removed was estimated to be $48,100 using methods es'^atlished by the Council of
Landscape Appraisers (1992) and the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture Plant Appraisal Committee
Plant Healtli Care Mariiigemem ■ Trei? Maragement Plans Tree bnemones Ho7x-d Tree AiS^ytssrrxnls
From Peter J Bedker To Wike Gaffiron Dale 6/17/99 Time 11 23 00 AM Page 3 of <
Mr. Weinberger • June 16, 1999
Page 2
(Simons 1996, Simons 1999). Since the trees were missing, average values (70%) were used for
condition contribution and placement with the exception of Tree 14. This tree had extensive decay In the
stump therefore the tree had no value. Table 1 presents species, stump height, stump diameter, estimated
DBH and estimated value for each of the significant canopy trees
The total area of canopy removed is estimated to be 14.450 ff. This estimate is based on the following
averaqe crown diameters:
American linden
Red oak
Sugar maple
50 feet
50 feet
40 feet
This area represents the union of crowns with the ? jove diameters centered over their stump locations.
The trees were located on a northeastern slope facing the lake. The steepest part of the slope represents
an 18 foot verticed change of grade and ranges from 27 percent to 60 percent from west to east. In a few
locations, equipment ruts were left during tree removal and the ruts have begun to erode. This slope also
creates issues of access and limits the type of equipment that may be used on site. In addition, the access
from the front yard to the back is only 10 feet wide.
Comments
1. It is my opinion that the circumstances of the unauthorized removal of trees dictates that the restoration
plan be consistent with the "Reasonable and Practical Replacement Cost" method of plant appraisal
(Council of Landscape Appraisers 1992). This method establishes the appraised damages are the
'cost to replace the number, size and species of trees destroyed to the extent that; 1) replacement
serves to substantially restore the character and quality of the property and 2) the cost of
replace.Tient is not greatly disproportionate to the resulting restoration..
2. It is not reasonable or practical to transplant large trees as part of this restoration. The alternative is to
establish a approximate time franne for the restoration and to plant trees that with anticipated growth
will largely restore the quality and character of the site within that established time frame. A reasonable
time frame is 20 to 25 years.
3. With growth, 2 0 inch caliper trees planted on average with a 25 foot spacing would reach crown
closure in this restoration time franrie. Twenty-nine trees planted at this 25 foot spacing would be
requires to completely replace the 14,450 ft’ of canopy removed
4. The kinds of trees planted should be consistent with the those that were removed (i.e. largely sugar
maple and American linden with a few red oaks mixed in) These trees are readily available in 2 0 inch
caliper
From’ Peter J Bedker To Mike Gaffron Date 6/17/99 Time 11 23 :o AM Paje 4 of 5
Mr. Weinberger - June 16,1999
Page 3
5. The above spacing should be staggered somewhat to provide for a more natural look
6. At the top of the slope and towards both sides, larger 4.0 to 4 5 inch ca ’iper trees should be planted
These trees by established standards should have an average height of 16 to 18 feet and 18 feet and
greater, respectively (ANSI Z60.1-1990). These trees should provide sufficient to begin to soften and
obscure the roof line of the Lusaich residence from the lake as soon as they are planted. The peak of
the east gable is 18 feet above grade and the peak of the gable end in the center of the house Is 26
feet above grade
7. Existing stumps and root systems should be left in place They v;ill continue to stabilize the slope and
prevent erosion. Any engineered solution would replace the natural character of the site. The
exception to tnis are three stumps located in the center of the house at the top of the slope, these may
be removed with ?. minimum of concern.
8. Planting within the slope should be done by hand with a minimum of soil disturbance.
The above parameters should provide sufficient guidance for developing a landscape restoration plan for
the L'jzaich residence. Unfortunately, it will still take time for the landscape to recover.
Please call me if you have any questions, or if I may be of further assistance.
■ Sirtceoely,
Peter j Bedker, Ph.D.
Consultng Community Forester
From Peter J Bedker To Mjke Gaffron Cate 6/17/59 T.me 11 23 00 AM Page 5 of 3
Mr. Weinberger • June 16, 1999
Page 4
Tibl61. List of siQDlficant trees renioved frorti the Luadch residence, 2490 Old Beach Road.
Stump Stump Diameter Estimated Estimated
Trae xSpecies Height (ft)(In)OBH (in)Value
1 Sugar mapip 45 15.7 15.7 $1,600
2 American linden 3.5 20 4 195 $2,200
3 Sugar maple 21 21.0 18.8 52,200
4 American linden 0.8 162 23 3 53,200
(five stems)08 13.2
0.8 132
0.8 126
0 8 144
5 Sugar maple 15 18.0 13.6 $1,300
6 Sugar maple 0.7 15.6 11.7 $1,100
7 Sugar maple 0.7 19?28. Ii'K400
(two stems)07 31 2
S Sugar maple 10 26 5 20.3 $2,500
9 Arnwrican Iind0r>0 7 33 0 25 5 S3,500
10 Northern red oak 4.5 CO30.6 55,100
11 Sugar maoie 1 0 25 C 192 $2,200
12 Arr.fei lean linden 1.6 20 4 41.2-$7 700
(five stems)1.6 22 8
2.8 22?
20 12.0
24 21.6
13 Sugar maple 1 5 10 2 14.5 $1,400
U American linden 0.7 24 0 18.4 $0
15 American linden 1.5 24.5 188 52 000
16 American linden 08 450 55 0 $6,100
17 Am.erican linden 0.5 210 16 0 $1 600
Total $43,100
Diameter of multiple stemmed trees is equivalent to the a ereter cf a single stem wth the combined cross-sectional
a ea of tne combined s.le.'TT.
I w r'"
Treescapes
^ Community Forestry Consultants
I
f
1214 Third Avenue NE
Buffalo, Mi'mesota 55313
(612) 682-9562
Voice &. Fax
July 15,1999
« t
Gary Mueller
Landplan Associates
9311 Rich Valley Blvd.
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077
RE: Review of Revised Planting Plan for R. Luzaich Residence
2490 Old Beach Road, Orono, MN
Application #2492
Dear Mr. Mueller:
This letter represents a review of your revised planting plan and outlines the parameters that would make it
'minimally acceptable" in my judgement as a restoration plan. This is as per your request during our phone
conversation on Tuesday, June 13,1999.
I have spent some time reviewing your revised planting plan and feel you and Mr. Luzaich have taken my
previous comments seriously and have made a significant effort to incorporate them into your plan. The
“minimally acceptable' parameters incorporated into this plan include the following:
1. The plan calls for stumps to be cut and removed flush with existing grade. This will leave root
systems intact and minimize the risk of soil erosion during establishment of the new plantings.
2. The shrubs you have proposed for planting on the slope have fibrous root systems, largely spread
by suckering and are well equipped to stabilize the slope and prevent erosion upon establishment.
3. You have reduced the length of the retaining wall to make it an architectural feature at the base of
the stairs. You have not provided proposed elevations for the top of the walls, but I assume they
are in the neighborhood of three to four feet above existing grade.
4. The large maturing tree species is appropriate and more diverse than what was there previously.
This adds interest to the property.
In my report to the City of Orono of June 16.1999,1 stated that a reasonable restoration time frame would
be 20 to 25 years. For the proposed species. 2.5 inch caliper trees would have crown diameters of 25 to
n Plant HcalUi Core Management ■ I rce Management Plans Irec Inventories Hazard Tree Assessments
Mr. Mueller-July 15. 1999
Page 2
30 feet after 20 to 25 years. Using these estimates your revised planting plan would result in 6,235 to
8,110 fP of tree canopy. This represents 43 to 56 percent of the estimated total removed. However, a
significant portion of this tree canopy will be over the adjacent properties to the northwest and the
southeast (see attached figure).
In my opinion, although this revised planting plan makes some significant strides forward, it dees yet
represent an adequate restoration plan. Needed revisions to make this plan “minimally acceptable* include
the following;
1.Proposed planting locations of canopy trees along each side of the property need to be moved
toward the center of the property by 10 feet.
2. The plan must propose to restore a minimum of 90% of the estimated 14,450 fP of tree canopy that
was removed at 25 years after planting.
This area can be achieved by increasing the spacing between proposed trees slightly and planting an
additional six to eight trees with a minimum spacing of 25 feet The current spacing of canopy trees is
approximately 19 feet on average. Three of these trees should be planted at or above the 950 foot
contour with one of these three pianted at or above the 956 foot contour.
I hope this helps to clarify the criteria that I will use to evaluate your proposed restoration plan. Please
don’t hesitate to give me a call if you have any questions.
4C-
Peter J. Bedker, Ph.D.
Consulting Community Forester
Enclosure
cc:Rick Luzaich
Paul Weinberger, City of Orono
CavN.op^ Covev
25 'ycao pWvcViv^^
E.V.-.*WJ +*^-' = -fi^
HJTo 4-oVb.l vei^oveA
«\CC I ■'. i3'
From Peter J Bedker To. Paul Weinberger Date 7/25/99 Time 11 40 16 AM * Page 2 of 2
6
Treescapes
Ootnmunity Fnreatry OonaultAnta
1214 Third Avenue NE
Buffalo. Minnesota 55313
(612) 682-9562
Voice & Fax
July2S, 1999
Paul Weinberger
City of Orono
2750 Kelly Parkway
Orono. MN 55356
RE: Review of Revised (7/21/99) Planting Plan for R. Luzaich Residence
2490 Old Beach Road, Orono, MN
Application #2492
Dear Mr. Weinberger:
I have had a chance to review the revised planting plan for the R. Luzaich residence at 2490
Old Beach Road. They made the modifications that I requested in my letter to Mr Mueller of
July 13. 1999.
With these modifications they propose to plant 24 canopy trees in addition to many shrubs and
small trees. The average spacing of the canopy trees still a little tight. On average the trees
aro proposed to be planted 18 7 ft on center. Using the same analysis that I have used
previously the proposed planting plan will restore approximately 83% o* the estimated existing
canopy cover in the 25 year restoration period.
I am prepared to recommend adopt! >n of this plan with only slight reservatioris. By increasing
the space between proposed trees they could increase the canopy cover to over 90% and I
would have no reservations whatsoever.
I hope this is of help. Unfortunately, I am out of the office for the next three days and won't be
abiQJo answer any further questions.
incerwy
Peter J. B^Ker, Ph.D.
Consulting Community Forester
PIoMt Hcnilh Cnrc M/iiiAgcincut ■ 1 lec Moiiagenietit Plait} B Tree Invenicries Ha^aId Tree Assessments
M
#n
• • * - •. .V
»*• .
••#• '
4
- •**'v* \
# .
*C
•* 7
V •'
/ •*>£>
L
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 7
#2485 ALEX AND CATHY JOHNSTON. CONTINUED
Alex Johnston was present.
Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to aliow a "guest tiouse”.
This property is located in the RR-1B. One Family Rural Residential District, which is a two acre
zoning district, and is comprised of 5.11 acres dry and 4.55 acres dry contiguous. A bam exists
on the southeast portion of the property that the Applicant is remodeling to instaii a guest
apartment. The bam is classified as an oversized accessory structure as it exceeds 1,000 square
feet.
Weinberger commented that as a condition of approval the property owner will be required to file a
restrictive covenant on the property that states, in part, that no future subdivision will be approved
that places the structure within a lot that has no principal structure, and if the property is subdivided,
the oversize accessory stmcture and principai structure wili be located together within a lot that
meets that minimum lot area requirement for Uie given size of accessory buiiding.
Weinberger stated that the property does not have a conforming septic system. The Applicants
have submitted a septic design that has been approved by the City, but a condition of approval
shall be that a final plumbing inspection be held until the septic system has been Installed and
approved by the City.
City Staff is recommending approval of this application based on the existing structure meets all
the yard requirements established by City Code for a guest house conditional use permit subject
to the conditions that a restrictive covenant is filed on the property for an oversized accessory
structure and that a final plumbing inspection be held until a septic system has been installed and
approved by the City.
Alex Johnston had no comment on his application.
Hawn commented that there does not appear to be any areas of contention with this application.
There were no public comments.
Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2485,
940 Brown Road South, to allow a guest house conditional use permit subject to the
structure meeting the yard requirements established by the Municipal Code for a guest
house conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: The property owner
files a restrictive covenant on the property for an oversized accessory structure as outlined on
Page 1, Items A, B, and C, of the May 10,1999 Zoning Administrator's Report, and that
a final plumbing inspection be held until a septic system has been installed and approved
by the City. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
Item #7 follows Item #10.
(#8) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - VARIANCE AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 7:23 p.m. • 8:17 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Rick and Gail Luzaich were present.
Page?
I:
• I
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NflNUTES FOR MAY 17,1999
#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED
Phil Reznick, Attomey-at-Law, was present.
Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting variance and conditional use permit approvals for
lakeshore land alteration, including grading and construction of retaining walls within 75 ’ of the
lakeshore and within a bluff Impact zone; and further request an after-the-fact approval, including
approval of a restoration plan, for intensive vegetative removal within 75 feet of the shoreline and
within a bluff impact zone. No restoration at this time has been completed.
Weinberger noted that the members of the Planning Commission have had an opportunity to
look at the property. Staff has concerns regarding the removal of the trees within 75 feet of the
shoreline due to possible erosion into the lake.
The Applicant Is proposing to construct a four foot retaining wall to extend along the slope. Staff
has issues regarding the proposed landscaping plan as it does not contain any provisions for
replace ■^;ent of the trees that have been removed. Staff is requesting that reforestation be required
as part of this application. Wally Case, Landscape Architect, has had an opportunity to review
the landscaping plan and is recommending that this property be reviewed by a forester to determine
what trees would be best for this type of soil.
City Staff Is recommending denial of the proposed landscape plan and requests that the Applicant
submit revised plans. Currently the stumps have not been removed. Staff would also like to have
the opportunity to review this application overtime to insure that proper restoration of this area Is
achieved with similar trees.
Reznick Inquired whether the City was requiring a replanting of mature trees approximately the
same size removed or if the Applicant could replace this type of trees with a smaller size tree.
Weinberger stated that the City is requesting that the Applicant replace the trees with fairly mature
trees, noting that It Is not possible to replace some of the larger trees.
Reznick expressed a concern regarding the cost of replacing the trees a.id suggested that the City
look at what Is right for the property rather than punishing the property owners. Reznick noted that
the Applicant has been charged with a misdemeanor. The Applicants are willing to cooperate with
the City to accomplish the restoration, but they would like to keep this property in line with the
other surrounding properties.
Reznick presented photographs to the Planning Commission and noted that the other properties
do not have the lake hidden from their view. Reznick requested that the Planning Commission
address the house plan, noting that the Applicants would like to start work on this property In the
near future. Reznick Indicated that they would like to remove the stumps and replace with some
shrubbing, and expressed a concern that the equipment that would be needed to replace the
trees could cause the soil to be disturbed further.
Hawn Indicated that she would like to see this property restored as quickly as possible to prevent
erosion. Hawn noted that the City has allowed rift-raft in cases where erosion has occurred, but
that the retaining walls are probably not going to be looked upon favorably by the Planning
Commission. Hawn staled that the Applicants will need to get together with the City foresters to
determine what is most feasible for this property.
Luzaich staled that he is fine with restoring the property, noting ‘hat he has spent money trimming
and pruning the other trees on his property and had merely removed what he thought was old
Page 8
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999
(#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED
unhealthy trees.
Stoddard remarked that the Planning Commission has to act on what is before it tonight, noting
that the Planning Commission is merely a recommending body and that any plans would need to
be approved by the City Council. Stoddard commented that the Applicant sho- Id work with City
Staff on the reforestation, noting that he would like to see some mature trees planted to screen
the neighbors ’ view as well as the proposed hardcover reduced.
Luzaich stated they had proposed the retaining walls in an effort to save the hill.
Weinberger commented that the stumps could possibly be removed but that the roots should
remain to help hold the dirt In place with new plants and trees planted.
Reznick inquired whether anything could be agreed to tonight.
Eric Paulson, Old Beach Road, stated that he has lived in this area for the past 21 years and
belongs to the Lafayette Bay Association which has been proactive In trying to preserve the natural
beauty of Lafayette Bay. Paulson remarked that the property owners were perhaps ignorant of the
laws regarding removal of trees by the lakeshore.
Gaffron remarked that the City of Orono did not and would not issue a permit to allow this type of
tragedy to occur, noting that the City was not notified of this until a week after the work had already
been completed. Gaffron stated that the City of Orono is adamant in its position that this *ype of
land alteration not occur near the lakeshore and that it is impossible to get back what has been
lost.
Weinberger stated that Wally Case is recommending that this property be reviewed by a forester
who will review the file and look at the types of soils and determine what types of trees could be
planted. Weinberger stated that they would like to have this process started sometime this week.
Hawn inquired whether the Applicant's landscape planner could meet with the forester.
Gary Mueller, Landscape Architect, stated he would be able to meet with the forester, noting that
they are willing to discuss this property and the recommendations that they have. Mueller
requested that the Planning Commission provide some guidance as to what t^ey feel should be
provided for this area.
Hawn stated that retaining walls are not the answer.
Stoddard staled that hardcover should be reduced and that he would like to see some larger trees
planted.
Lindquist remarked that the Comprehensive Plan is clear and that everything possible should be
done to restore what was lost. Lindquist stated that they should meet with the City’s forester as
soon as possible to resolve this issue. Lindquist commented that this application will need to be
tabled since the proposal Is not acceptable as presented tonight.
Berg commented that she is in agreement with the other members of the Planning Commission and
would like to see some larger trees planted In this area to help restore what was lost.
Luzaich inquired whether the stairway down to the lakeshore was okay.
Pages
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999
#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED
Stoddard stated that he should woric with City Staff to determine the appropriate width cf the
stairway, noting that the Planning Commission Is not attempting to deny access to the lake by the
Applicant.
Mueller stated that they would like to remove the stumps, grind them down to the point where they
are no longer protruding, which will require some minor grading of the slope. Mueller stated that
they would also like to eradicate the poison ivy and other nuisances that occur on the bank.
Mueller inquired whether they could commence work on the retaining wail as a means to prevent
erosion, noting that they will have a civil engineer out to inspect the site to insure that the wail will
stay in place. Mueller commented that they would like to have a better understanding of what type
of trees and size of trees the City would like to see for this area, noting that it is impossible to
replace some of the larger trees.
Hawn stated that they would like to see as large cf trees planted as possible that have a good
change for survival, and that perhaps the forester would be in a better position to address that.
Mueller inquired whether this application could proceed to the City Council on the condition that
agreement is reached with City Staff on a level of treatment that is appropriate for this area.
Stoddard stated the Planning Commission can vote on this application or table the application,
noting that the Applicant will not be able to do any grading or retaining walls.
Mueller inquired whether the stumps could be removed.
Lindquist stated that in his opinion no work should be done given the history of this application until
it has been approved. Lindquist remarked that he would not be comf'* '’able approving any work on
this property until City Staff and the Cit/s forester has had an opportunity to look at this situation,
and that in his opinion this application should be tabled.
Stoddard indicated they could spray the poison ivy.
Mueller inquired whether alt the weeds could be sprayed.
Stoddard stated that only the poison ivy may be sprayed.
Hawn commented that the weeds nay be cut. Hawn indicated that this application will probably be
denied if voted on tonight.
Weinberger indicated that this application requires variances and a conditional use permit that
needs to be acted upon regardless of the landscape plan. City Staff is willing to work with the
Applicant on this matter.
Luzaich requested that his application be tabled.
Hawn inquired whether the 60 day time limit needs to be extended.
Weinberger inquired whether the Appiicant would be willing to waive the 60 day limitation.
Luzaich indicated he would be willing to waive the 60 day time period.
Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to table Application #2492,2490 Old Beach Road,
Page 10
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999
#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED
with the understanding that the Applicant will work with City Staff and the City's forester
on an appropriate plan of action for restoration of the lakeshore and bluff area, and
that the 60 day time period is waived. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
(#9) #2493 KATHERINE TAYLOR HOMES, 692 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCES, 8:18 p.m. -
8:47 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Katherine Taylor was present.
3arb Hugh, property owner, was present.
Weinberg yr stated the Applicant is requesting several variances to construct a two car garage where
a one car garage exists and to attach a deck to the second garage on the property. The property
is served with two garages, the first Is a one stall detached located on Tonkawa Road and the
second Is a two car garage attached to ihe house. This property Is located In the LR-1B, One Family
Lakeshore Residential District, which has a minimum of one acres, and this property consists of
.36 acre.
The Applicant Is proposing to construct a deck off the back portion of the two car garage w4th a spiral
stsircase located next to It, which would allow access to that arp*>. Currently there are building
permits issued to this property for the remodeling of an office area above the existing garage. The
deck becomes an issue because it is new hardcover located over existing hardcover, and any time
that structural coverage Is placed over non-structural hardcover, it requires a hardcover variance.
The a.dition of the deck would not increase the hardcover on this property, nor would it Increase the
amount of structural coverage allowed on the property. The deck would bring the structural
coverage to 15 percent.
The Applicant has proposed iv/o options for the garage. Option A would move the garage back to the
required 30 foot distance for a garage loading space of a right-of-way. However, the setback In this
area is 35 feet, so it would still require a variance to the street yard setback. This option increases
structural coverage to 16.4 percent, exceeding the 15 percent allowed. This option also allows the
occupants of the property easier access In and out of the garage during the winter months when the
steep driveway approach prevents safe access Into the property. Hardcover would also Increase In
the 250-500' setback. Currently hardcover Is at 42.5 percent. Only a small portion of the residence
Is located within the 75-250' setback. The Applicant is proposing hardcover in the amount of 70.2
percent in the 250-500* setback.
Weinberger stated Option B would utilize the existing location of the one stall garage. The Applicant
would construct a second stall to the existing one stall garage. This maintains the garage within the
required setbacks on the property, but still would require hardcover and structurai coverage
variances. This option would not increase the hardcover as substantially as Option A. This option
simply places an addition on the existing garage, which is located approximately two tc three feet off
the property line. The new garage proposed in Option A would meet the 10 foot setback.
City Staff has reviewed this plan and have determined that the Applicant could construct a two stall
garage that would be located 10 feet from the street property line and 10 feet from the side property
line if the doors are faced away from the street. However, this option probably cannot be done since
City Code requires a distance of 30 feet from the garage doors to the street. Tonkawa Road Is a
Page 11
. ——- -
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JUNE 21,1999 K
(#2496 PATRICK AND JEANNE OTLANAGAN, CONTINUED)
small lot size.
Stoddard commented that that is a bigger issue than what is before the Planning Commission
tonight.
Hawn stated that the Planning Commission is routinely asked to approve variances for small lots
and that this Issue should perhaps be addressed.
Smith noted that the total structural coverage is under the allowable limits and that the Applicant
is not able to place the garage in a different location.
Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2496,
to allow for the location of an existing detached garage and two decks on the property
located at 3895 North Shore Drive, and to permit a crowding principal structure variance
to allow a six foot wide deck to be constructed between the existing residence and the
proposed detached garage where ten feet is required, to permit a side yard variance
to allow the accessory structure (detached garage) to be located six feet where ten feet
is required from the side lot line, to pemiit a rear yard variance to allow construction of
the proposed 8 by 18 foot deck on the south side of the residence 24 feet from the rear
lot line where 30 feet is required, subject to inspection by the City Building Inspector of
the footings or slab on grade for the garage. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
OLD BUSINESS
(#2) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD, AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Rick Luzaich, Applicant, was present, along with Phil Reznick, Attomey-at-Law, and Gary Mueller.
Landscape Architect.
Gaffron stated this application was reviewed at the May 17th Planning Commission wherein the
Planning Commission advised the Applicant that the proposed restoration plan was not appropriate
and the Applicant was directed to submit a revised plan after consultation vrith Staff and the City's
consulting forester.
Gaffron stated that the Applicant submitted a revised plan prior to meeting with the City's consulting
forester, which incorporates a single retaining wall at the base of the slope along with replacement
of a small number of trees along the sides of the property. The Applicant's landscape architect and
the City's consulting forester discussed the proposal, and concluded that their individual strategies
for restoration of this property are quite different. Gaffron noted that it is the City's goal to have the
lakeshore restored to a wooded, natural appearance as quickly as possible, and while the Applicant's
plan is a good landscape plan, it is not a restoration plan.
Gaffron reviewed the City's consulting forester's comments and recommendations regarding the
restoration of this properly, noting that a total of 17 trees with a stump diameter 12 inches or
greater were removed from the lake side of the residence, with the value of the removed trees being
estimated at $48,000. it would generally be unreasonable to expect restoration costs to excc<^ this
amount. Bedker is recommending that 29 trees of two Inch caliper on a 25 inch average spacing
would be needed to eventually replace the 14,450 square feet of lost canopy, with la^er 4.0 to 4.5
inch caliper trees being placed at the top of the slope to soften and obscure the roofline of the
Page 3
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JUNE 21,1999
(#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH. CONTINUED)
existing residence as viewed from the lake. Bedker is also recommending that the majority of the
existing stumps and root systems remain in place to stabilize the slope, as well as hand planting of
the trees to avoid disturbing tt.e soil. Bedker has indicated that the retaining wall at the base of the
slope is not necessary for stabilization of the slope.
Gaffron stated the Applicant is proposing four birch clumps at the base of the slope and a half-dozen
maples along the two sides of the site, along with other proposed shrubbery along the edges of the
lot or on the lake side of the retaining wall.
Gaffron noted that the Applicant's revised proposal makes no attempt to, over time, restore the site
to its original appearance in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code which
states: Lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas
will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff ar:d soil
ere iion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clearculting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave
action erosion, natural stone rip-rap shoreline protection will be encouraged. In addition, retention
of natural vegetation will limit the impact of urbanization as visible from the lake. Building heights
will be limited to less than the typical tree height. Minimum green belts will be provided with
prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be
preserved on slopes. Retaining walls will be discouraged except when absolutely necessary to
prevent erosion, In which case they will be screened with natural vegetation.
Gaffron suggested the Planning Commission has the option of denying this application, and sending
it on to Council, noting that the revised landscape plan does not meet the restoration goals of the
City; or this matter could be tabled to allow the Applicant time to submit a revised plan in accordance
with the City forester's recommendations.
Reznick commented that the Applicant's revised plan was submitted in May but that the City's
forester was not provided with the necessary information until this past Friday. The Applicant's
landscape architect was not able to meet with the City's forester due to the short time period
before tonight's meeting.
Reznick stated that the four inch diameter trees are too large to bring in to be planted, ar.d that
the Applicant should not be penalized by having to plan trees in excess of $48,100.
Stoddard remarked that the Applicant is not being requested to plant trees in excess of $48,100,
noting that the forester states that it would be unreasonable to expect restoration costs to exceed
that amount.
Reznick stated in his opinion the value of the trees removed should not have a bearing on what is
being proposed for restoration and is irrelevant.
Nygard stated that the number of the trees cut down is completeiy relevant, noting that it is against
City's regulations regarding clearcutting of property.
Reznick stated the issue before the Planning Commission is what to do with the property now and
that the Appiicant should not be requested to plant more trees than what was removed. Reznick
commented that a majority of the trees to be replanted are located within the site line from the
house to the lake and that the property owner does have a right to tnm the trees located within the
sight iine. Reznick stated that the trees removed were removed to provide a view to the lake.
Luzaich commented that their revised plan is a compromise by providing reforestation as weli as
Page 4
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JUNE 21,1999
(#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED)
providing a view of the lake. Luzaich stated that the amount of trees recommended by the City’s
forester to be planted are excessive and that the trees will need to be trimmed to provide a view of
the lake. Luzaich remarked that he would also like to plant vegetation along the slope rather than
let weeds grow.
Smith stated that the forester is recommending natural vegetation on the slope and that some
reconciliation of the two plans needs to be accomplished.
Mueller stated that the revised plan was submitted shortly afte.* the last Planning Commission
meeting and attempts were made to follow the directions of the Planning Commission ar far as
replanting of the trees, noting that the trees and shrubs that were selected are intended to blend in
and look like they belong along the lakeshore, which was one of the objectives that the Planning
Commission had stated at the last meeting.
Mueller stated that the property owner should have the right to have a view of the lake, noting that
the forester's plan does not allow that view and would create more of a wall of vegetation.
Mueller remarked that he made numerous attempts to contact Paul Weinberger in an effort to
obtain the name of the City's forester and was not able to reach him until June 7th. Mueller stated
he was not able to contact the forester until June 1 1th and was informed that he just received the
Information regarding this application the other day. During the conversation with the forester H was
apparent that the forester was not provided with the revised landscape plan by the Applicant. The
forester's plan was not received until the 14th, which did not allow time for the Applicant to meet
with the forester and to develop a revised plan based upon his recommendations.
Mueller remarked that there are discrepancies in the number of trees and the size of the trees
that were purportedly removed, and that these issues will need to be worked out before another plan
is revised. Mueller commented that the Applicant's landscape plan was designed to meet the
spirit of what the Planning Commission had recommended at the last meeting.
Stoddard commented that the Planning Commission wanted the Applicant's landscape architect
to meet vrith the City's forester in order to develop a plan that would be agreeable to all parties and
is in compliance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Stoddard stated he would like Mueller to
meet with the City's forester in order to address some of these issues.
Hawn stated that there are some deficiencies In the Applicant's landscape plan vmich need to be
addressed, and suggested that Mueller meet vrith the City’s forester to discuss these issues.
Hawn noted that the Comprehensive Plan calls for restoration of the canopy that was removed.
Lindquist stated that it was clear at the last Planning Commission meeting that the City was looking
for restoration of this area, which is still the City's goal for this property.
Luzaich remarked that in his opinion this landscape plan does meet that objective.
Reznick stated that the revised landscape plan does include vegetation and trees that are
Indigenous to the area as was specified by the Planning Commission at the prior meeting. Reznick
inquired where the term reforestation is used in the Code, and what is the City's authority to
require restoration.
Hawn stated that the City’s goal is to re-establish what was removed, which Is something that the
Page 6
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JUNE 21,1999
(#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED)
City has required in the past in similar circumstances. Hawn stated that the Comprehensive Plan
is merely a suggested code of property conduct and not a criminal code.
Stoddard stated that some of these issues should be handled by the City Attorney and City Council.
Smith commented that the City has applied the same restoration concept to other similar
situations in the past.
Gaffron stated that this happens approximately once a year and that it has been the City's practice
to require reforestation of the area that has been cleared Gaffron commented that it is not realistic
to expect the property owner to replace the larger trees with similar trees of the same size.
There were no public comments.
Reznick distributed photographs of the neighboring properties to the members of the Planning
Commission.
Smith inquired who was responsible for the costs of the forester.
Gaffron stated that his fees would be charged to the Applicant.
Berg commented that she has lived in that area for approximately 20 years with the area existing
as depicted in the photographs for that entire time.
Stoddard stated the Planning Commission can either vote on what Is before us tonight or table the
matter to allow the Applicant time to meet with the City's forester.
Luzaich stated he would like to negotiate a plan that would be acceptable to all parties.
Hawn remarked that it Is difficult to negotiate a plan that would be acceptable without the Cit/s
forester being present. Hawn stated in light of the disputed facts, it would be best If the Applicant's
landscape architect met with the City's forester. Hawn noted she v/as not In favor of the Applicant's
proposed landscape plan.
Stoddard commented that the forester's recommendations should be followed.
Smith stated she cannot approve this landscape plan as presented.
Hawn inquired whether the Applicant would like the Planning Commission to act on this plan tonight
or to table the matter, noting that if the application proceeds to the City Council and is denied, the
application would come back before the Planning Commission.
Reznick requested that this item be tabled temporarily to allow the Applicant time to discuss his
options.
(This item was tabled at 7:46 p.m. and follows Item #4)
NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS, CONTINUED
Page 6
ORONO PLANNING C0M>nSS10N
MONDAY, JUNE 21,1999
(#2497 GAIL BRINER, CONTINUED)
Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2497,1760
Shadywood Road, to allow the Applicant to rebuild an existing rotting deck, and to
grant a lakeshore setback variance to allow the proposed deck to be located within
75* of the lakeshore and to grant a hardcover variance to allow 673 square feet of hardcover
in the 0-75* lakeshore setback area to permit the construction of the proposed deck, subject
to the rock and plastic underlayment being removed under the deck and plastic removed
from under the rock that is not under the deck. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
OLD BUSINESS. CONTINUED
(#2) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZIAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT
VARIANCE
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Reznick stated that they would like the Planning Commission to vote on this application tonight.
Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend denial of Application #2492,2490 Old
Beach Road, for an after-the-fact variance and conditional use permit for a retaining wall,
and recommend to the City Council that the Applicant and the Applicant's Landscape
Architect meet with the City's Forester in order to revise a new landscape plan for
consideration by the City Council which la more In accordance with the recommendations of
the City Forester in order to allow this item to be expedited. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 2,
Smith and Berg Opposed.
Smith staled she was opposed to this application due to the lack of direction being given by the
Planning Commission to the City Council on the revised landscape plan that is to be submitted.
Berg stated that the Planning Commission should vote on the plan that is to be presented to the
City Council.
NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS. CONTINUED
#5) #2499 THOMAS AND MARILYN SWANSON, 1740 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES,
8:03 p.m. -8:16 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Thomas and Marilyn Swanson. Applicants, were present.
Gaffron stated the Applicants are proposing to assemble a temporary screen enclosure. 19' by 17*
on an existing deck. The screen enclosure will be assembled in the early spring and taken down
in the late fall. The screen enclosure and existing deck are located within the 0-75' lakeshore
setback. The structural coverage would increase with the screen porch, however, the hardcover
amount does not change.
Gaffron stated that a lakeshore setback variance is required to allow a 10' by 17' screen porch on
an existing deck to be located within 75' of the lakeshore and a hardcover variance to allow 1,973
square feet, or 21.5 percent, in the 0-75' lakeshore setback area where zero percent is allowed.
Page 8
ORONO CTTV COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 12,1999
L
(»4) U2488 GREGG AND THERESA KLOHN, 4455 NORTH SHORE DRIVE •
VARIANCE- Continued
Peterson moved, Kelley seconded to amend the motion to approve a 5* side yard
variance, a 15* street setback, allow a 10 x 18* structure, and require the removal of the
cement slab. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 (Flint abstained).
Jabbour commented that if the Council wants everyone to have the chance to have a two-car
garage, the ordinance should mandate in the hardcover calculation that an area for a two-car
garage will be subtracted on new construction.
(»S) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - VARIANCE
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Rick Luzaich, Applicant, was present.
Weinberger stated that this past Spring, the City was made aware of tree removal occurring
on the property located at 2490 Old Beach Road. The tree removal included trees located
within the 75’ setback of the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka and along a steep
slope. He displayed a diagram showing where the clear cutting occurred. The City did issue a
stop work order, but it was after the trees had been removed. The stop work order occurred
prior to the removal of any of the stumps and any regrading that was proposed to occur.
Weinberger reviewed the ordinances covering tree removal. Part of the code addresses
intensive vegetation clearing and does not allow intensive vegetation clearing within 75’ of the
shoreline or on steep slopes within the shoreland area. Tree removal within 75’ of the
lakeshore requires a permit fi’om the City. Nearly the entire area is within 75’ of the shoreline
or on a steep slope.
Shortly after the stop work order was issued, staff met with a landscaper hired by Mr. Luzaich
to discuss the proposed landscape plan. Weinberger displayed a plan reviewed by the Planning
Commission in May 1999. The plan consisted of a series of retaining walls on the slope and
would have requir^ major grading along the entire steep slope. The Planning Commission
tabled the application and recommended that the applicant work with staff to develop a plan
that didn’t require grading or retaining walls. The Plamung Commission also wanted to see
the plan demonstrate restoration of the types of vegetation removed, not what appeared on
the landscape plan. The plan did not reflect what was removed from the site and did not show
any mature trees being replaced.
The City then retained Dr. Peter Bedker, a consulting forester, to complete a site analysis of
the property and make recommendations for staff and for the property owners. He looked at
the site to determine the types of soils, the slope and the types of trees that had existed on the
property. Dr. Bedker compiled a list of recommendations and estimated the value of the
removed trees at 548,000. He recommended that an adequate replacement would be 29 trees
of 2” caliper to be spaced 25’ apart. He also recommended 4” to 4 1/2” cahper trees at the top
Page 10
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 12,1999
(#5) U2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PER\HT- Continued
- VARIANCE AND
of the hill. Dr. Bedker did state it might be counter productive to put a 16 ” tree back for a 16 ”
tree as the tree may or may not survive. A smaller tree may survive better and surpass the
growth of a more mature tree.
The Planning Commission reviewed a revised plan at their June meeting. The plan had one
large retaining wall running from one side of the property to the other. The plan implemented
some grading and there were a few hardwood trees included. It was a good plan, but h did not
reflect the City ’s goals as enumerated in the Comprehensive Plan. The goal of the City is to
have a shoreline maintained that breaks up the height of the buildings and breaks up the
appearance of a built environment around the lake. A larger canopy of trees would help
prevent erosion problems. Weinberger said the Planning Commission voted, by a vote of 4-2,
to deny the application in order to expedite the process and move a plan forward to the City
Council because the land is laying dormant and some types of erosion control will have to be
implemented in order to protect the shoreline.
Weinberger reported that Gary Mueller, Mr. Luzaich ’s landscape architect, met with Dr.
Bedker to discuss some of the issues and Dr. Bedker’s recommendations. Weinberger said the
plan brought in some of Dr. Bedker’s recommendations, but it does not address all of them.
There is still a large amount of grading being proposed on the hill side and not the
recommended type of trees. He said that a new plan was received from Mr. Mueller on Friday,
July 9,1999. This plan implemented some of Dr. Bedker’s recommendations and it is closer to
the goal of restoration along the lakeshore. The amount of grading on this plan would be very
minimal. Two areas of retaining wall would be used to support the existing stairwell. The
types of trees have increased, but they are all located along the property lines and they are not
in areas that allow for a more natural appearance from the lake. In the middle of the plan there
is a series of perennial plantings which would be adequate for erosion control. They are
natural and would not require high levels of maintenance. It was noted in Dr. Bedker’s
recommendations that there be 25 ’ spacing between trees. The plan does not address the issue
of the 29 tree replacement. There is a concern about the center of the property and the trees
being located completely on the sides of the property and not in front of the house or along
the shoreline. He displayed photographs of the property. Dr. Bedker communicated to
Weinberger that most of his recommendations are answered by this plan with the exception of
the spacmg between the trees and location of some trees in the front of the house and near the
shoreline.
Jabbour asked Weinberger to elaborate on the vote by the Planning Commission.
Weinberger responded that the two votes that were opposed to the recommendation of denial
by the Planning Commission were because the Planning Commission thought it was
appropriate to review another plan. They were not necessarily in support of the plan that was
in front of them, but they felt that they should present a plan to the City Council that they had
Pa^e 11
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 12,1999
(#5) U2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - VARIANCE AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ~ Continued
reviewed. The other members of the Planning Commission felt it was important to expedite
the process.
Sansevere asked if Weinberger had any idea from Dr. Bedker how many trees he wanted to
see in the middle of the property and along the shoreline.
Weinberger said that according to the appraisal value, the plan is approximately 10 trees short;
however. Dr. Bedker felt the goals could be accomplished by fewer trees, three or four at the
top of the hill and a couple of trees toward the bottom of the hill.
Luzaich stated his reasons for removing the trees. He said the trees were storm damaged and
there was dead fall. He said he should have applied for a permit, but he did not. He feels this
plan is appropriate and fits the neighborhood.
Jabbour said the plan does not fit the Comprehensive Plan for a natural-looking environment.
Luzaich said he objects to paying for retaining Dr. Bedker. He said this is the third plan he has
submitted and he has tried to work with the City staff. He pointed out that in front of the
residence there are another two acres of land containing approximately 1,100 trees.
Jabbour said he concurs with the City forester’s recommendations. Jabbour said he feels that
4-6 ” trees could be planted. He would like the neighbors consulted so their view of the lake is
not cut off. He said his primary concern is to revegetate the hill and bring it back as much as
possible.
Sansevere asked if Luzaich would object to putting trees in the middle of the property and
along the lakeshore.
Luzaich said he does not want to put trees in the middle of the property and along the
lakeshore because he would not be able to see the lake.
Sansevere pointed out that the photographs of the neighboring properties show trees in the
middle of the property and along the lakeshore.
Kelley referred to the memo from Dr. Bedker, page 2, comment 2, which states that it is not
reasonable or practical to transplant large trees as part of this restoratiorL Kelley asked why
Dr. Bedker came to that conclusion and if it was because of money.
Weinberger said the main reason is that Dr. Bedker is dealing with the $48,000 for
restoration, but he also felt that often smaller trees will survive better and surpass the growth
of larger trees.
Page 12
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 12,1999
(»5) U2492 RICK AND GAIL LVZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Continued
- VARIANCE AND
Kelley said he does not want him to be constrained by dollars and he doesn’t care if it costs
Luzaich $100,000 to replace the trees. He would like to get an opinion from the forester that
money is not an issue in reforestation of this property.
Weinberger said that Dr. Bedker told him they are essentially estimates on what they figure
the value of the tree is. He said it is usually a formula that could be used for insurance or
apprmsal purposes, but h is not exact. He said the size of the trees can be negotiated.
Jabbour said Kelley is trying to find out what the practical size of a tree is and what is the
biggest tree that could be planted without starting to impair growth by its size.
Flint said the risk is greater the larger the tree.
Gaflfron said that Dr. Bedker told him you can assume that a 2 ” tree will not thrive for 2 years,
a 3 ” tree will not thrive for three years and so on. It will take longer for a larger diameter tree
to start to grow again. There will be better and quicker growth and a greater chance of
survival wth smaller trees.
Jabbour said he would like to see staff develop a revegetation plan, he would like to see the
neighbors approve it, a staff recommendation for an assurance on longevity, right of entry,
and a letter of credit. He said the trees should be scattered similarly to how they were located
before they were cut down.
Kelley said he wants protection for the future that the trees will be maint^ed.
Kelley moved to refer the matter to the consultant for a restoration plan. There was no
second to the motion.
Jabbour asked how long a waiver the City has from the applicant.
Weinberger said the applicant signed a waiver form where there is no deadline date.
Kelley asked Barrett if that was okay.
Barrett said yes.
Jabbour asked Barrett if there is any action the City must take to protect its interests.
Barrett said the Council can take action on the application for the conditional use permit
unless they wish to have the restoration plan included with the conditional use permit. He said
the City does not need to depend for the reforestation plan on some application made by the
r13
ORONO CITY COUNCIL NIEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 12,1999
(»5) U2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - VARIANCE AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Continued
applicant. He said the City has an independent legal basis to compel the landowner to reforest
and restore the property which has been altered illegally.
Jabbour asked the applicant what he would like the Council to do.
Luzaich said he wants the Council to approve the plan.
Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to deny the restoration plan for Application #2492,
Rick and Gail Luzaich, 2490 Old Beach Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Luzuch said this is the third plan he has submitted. He said from what he can tell, the City
wants him to let the weeds on the hill grow wild and plant a mass of trees so he can’t see the
lake. He asked if that is what the Council wants him to do.
Jabbour said no. He asked Weinberger to display the plan the City is proposing. Jabbour said
Mr. Luzaich ’s position was self-imposed. The City is the victim in this situation, not Mr.
Luzaich.
Weinberger stud that Dr. Bedker was asked to make recommendations, not design a specific
plan.
Jabbour stud that the quantity of trees should be as recommended by Dr. Bedker and they
should be in the immediate vicinity of what was cut down. If the landscape architect believes h
would be more advantageous to move some of them towards the lake front, so be it. Dr.
Bedker and the landscape architect should work it out. He asked if there could be a new plan
by the next Council meeting.
Luzaich said he would consult with his landscape architect. He said he doesn ’t like being told
he has to plant specific trees in specific places.
Kelley said he would direct staff to have the City ’s consultant and the applicant’s landscape
architect work together on a plan that the City ’s consultant will approve. Kelley said he will
not approve a plan that the City ’s consultant has not approved.
Sansevere feels the applicant’s plan would be detrimental to the applicant when the trees are
mature.
Luzaich said the property is so wide that he would still have a good view.
Weinberger said that Mr. Mueller and Dr. Bedker did meet to discuss the plan. He said that
when he spoke to Dr. Bedker about the plan that was submitted on Friday, Dr. Bedker stated
Page 14
/
/ •
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 12,1999
(#5) U2492 RICK AND GALL LUZAICB, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Continued
-VARIANCE AND
that most of his recommendations were implemented and the only issue he had was the
spacing of the trees.
Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to table Application #2492, Rick and Gail Luzaich,
2490 Old Beach Road, for After the Fact Variances and Conditional Use Permit
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(•#6) #2496 PATRICK O’FLANAGAN, 3895 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES
- RESOLUTION NO. 4318
Kelley moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4318 Granting Variances to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivbions 12 ands 15(F) and Section 10.25,
Subdivbion 6(B), Application #2496. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(•#7) #2499 THOMAS AND MARILYN SWANSON, 1740 SHADYWOOD ROAD -
VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4319
Kelley moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4319 Granting Variances to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1(A) and 2 and Section 10.56,
Subdivbion 16(L)(1), FUe #2499. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#8) #2500 ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278,685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD
NORTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4320
Kelley moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4320 Granting a Conditional
Use Permit for a Media Center Addition to the Orono High School at 795 Old Ciystal
Bay Road North for Orono School Dbtrict #278 per Municipal Zoning Code Section
10.28, Subdivbion 3, File #2500. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT
Kelley asked Gappa for a status report on the road projects.
Gappa said that progress is good on Femdale Road and the project is on schedule. On Coimty
Road 15, they are cutting back to where the finald road edge will be on the north ade.
Kelley asked about the road in Saga Hill.
Jabbour said the City has a purchase agreement. The City is waiting to fulfill its part of the
purchase agreement which b vacating the easement in the alley.
Page 15
I
'A, .aiimB V h.ftkA-a fm M V «• I t ft ■
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 2 7 W99
CUY OF ORONO
DATE: 9/23/99
ITEM NO.:
Department Approval:
Name Paul Weinberger
Title Zoning Administrator/Planner
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description:#2510 Douglas and Claudia Whiteley David and Heidi Hust
60 Orono Orchard Road/45 Smith Avenue
Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement — Class I Subdivision
Zoning District:RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre)
Lot Area: (Existing)60 Orono Orchard Road
45 Smith Avenue
55,862.6 s.f.
52,350.2 s.f.
Attachments
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
Resolution
Application
Location Map
Section Map
Plat Map
Reduced Survey
Site Topography
Sewer Project Map
Property Owners List
Summary of Request:
The applicants are owmers of two properties located at 60 Orono Orchard Road 45 Smith Avenue.
They have proposed a Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement between the lots that results in two
substandard lots. It is the intent of the applicants to gain an additional 17' of frontage along Orono
Orchard Road to allow for an addition of living space to the home. The lot line rearrangement would
involve a land swap of approximately 2,500 s.f of land from each property to the other. Please refer
to the enclosed survey illustrating the existing and proposed lot arrangement.
Both properties are part of the Orono Orchard sewer expansion this year. Septic testing and setbacks
are not an issue for either property.
Lot Eitisriny Lot Size FrOPOStd Lot Sfeg
60 Orono Orchard Road 55,862.6 s.f. 55,807.3 s.f.
45 Smith Avenue 52,350.2 s.f. 52,405.5 s.f.
Both lots would remain approximately the same size and each lot would have increased frontage
along the front lot line.
Pertinent Ordinance
Section 10.28 RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District
Lot Lot Front Side Rear
Area Width Yard Yard lad
2 acres 200 feet 50 feet 30 feet 50 feet
Lot Area and Yards
60 Orono Orchard Road
Exbtipg
Lot Size 55,862.6 s.f
Lot Width (front) 210 feet
Lot Width (rear) 182 feet
Structure Setback (side) 28.5 feet
Proposed
Lot Size 55,807.3 s.f
Lot Width (front) 227 feet
Lot Width (rear) 164 feet
Structure Setback (side) 43 feet
4S Smith Avenue
Eicwting
Lot Size 52,350.2 s.f
Lot Width (front) 161.0 feet
Lot Width (rear) 191.5 feet
Structure Setback (side) 58.7 feet
Proposed
Lot Size 52405.5 s.f
Lot Width (front) 178.0 feet
Lot Width (rear) 174.5 feet
Structure Setback (side) 75.5 feet
Lots in the RR-IB district are required to be 200' wide at the front yard setback. Each lot would
increase 17' in width should the subdivision be approved. The impact on the rear property width
would be minimal with each lot only losing 17' in width at the rear.
staff Recommendation
Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rearrangement as proposed based on the following
conditions:
1.
2.
Applicant shall dedicate drainage and utility easement along interior property lines.
Applicant shall provide to the City any documentation relating to easements on both
properties.
Planning Commission Recommendation
On a vote of 6 to 0 to approve the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement based on the conditions
noted above in the Staff Recommendation.
Council Action Requested
To adopt or amend the attached resolution.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION
OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR PROPERTIES
LOCATED AT 60 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH
AND 45 SMITH AVENUE
FILE NO. 2465
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal coq)oration organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council '/
has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within
the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of
a lot line rearrangement by Douglas Whiteley and Claudia Whiteley and David Hust and Heidi
Hust (hereinafter "the subdividers") of properties legally described as:
Lots 57. 58, 77, 78, Orono Orchards, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
and
Lots 59, 60, 75, 76, Orono Orchards, according to the recorded plat thereof, EXCEPT the
southeasterly 35.00 feet of said Lot 75, as measured at a right angle to the southeasterly line of
said Lot 75, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
To be rearranged by transfer of property within the above described properties to as follows:
Exhibit "A"
WHEREAS, After due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota
Stanites 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning
Commission held a public hearing on August 16, 1999 at which time all persons desiring to be
heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of the City for a
subdivision to rearrange the property lines between 60 Orono Orchard Road South and 45 Smith
Avenue.
Page 1 of 7
WHEREAS, At their regular meeting held on September 27,1999, the Orono City
Council considered the subdivision application of Douglas and Claudia Whiteley; and David and
Heidi Hust, noting the following fmdings of fact:
1.The property is located within the RR>1B, Single Family Rural Residential District
requiring a minimum of 2 acres lot area. The existing lots are as follows:
60 Orono Orchard Road 55,862.6 s.f.
45 Smith Avenue 52,350.2 s.f.
2.Both lots are scheduled for sanitary sewer installation. The rearrangement will not
require drainfield sites on each lot.
3.
4.
Drainage and utility easements have been dedicated along interior property lines.
Lots in the RR-IB district are required to be 200 ’ wide at the front yard setback.
Each lot increases 17' in width. The impact on the rear property width would be
minimal with each lot only losing 17' in width at the rear.
5. The code defmes subject lots as through lots.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Orono
hereby approves the lot line rearrangement of the above referenced property by the subdividers
as shown on the certificate of survey by David E. Crook, a licensed surveyor, dated July 21, 1999
and revised September 20,1999, attached Exhibit "B". The approval is subject to the following
conditions:
1.TTie new legal description for Parcels A and B, as shown on the survey sited above,
shall read as follows:
Exhibit "A
2. New drainage and utility easements as follows:
Exhibit "C
Page 2 of 7
3. The aforesaid division shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by
the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office or Registrar
of Titles Office on or before March 27,1999 together with a certified original copy
of this resolution.
4.The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the division has not been
filed by the date specified above. In that event, a new application shall be required
for the City of Orono review.
LEGAL DOCUMENTS required:
a) Title Opinions addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with
property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by
such interest.
b) The subdivider must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently
affecting the property.
Copies of Certificate of Survey for filing with Hennepin County.
Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota this 27th day of September,
1999.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Cleric Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Page 3 of 7
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
> ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of September,
1999, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a
Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 7
Exhibit A
la/s ^9^ /S', 7S ^a/' 77/y//p^
S^4//C&S^s/^!r/y ^ 0/70^ /7^^
/ia//Ae Sff^/i^^s/9<r/y >^>7^
/?^0//S O^S///f^/?S. S'J/CSi^T^ //^a/y7atr/a/’s^/^
^7 4vA/d*A //^s ypdAA^n^dsTar^//
i//A^ a^ / 7 SS/dd/sdc//Ad^s/a^yy ypdii^/Ai^d^sAy7y
//7^d /Aa^ddj7. so SXOS/^r' y<^d SO<yy9tfOOS/4esr/y SSOO
/da/ a/* So/o' /a/ 7S^ os /77aos^<rd£/ o7a ^
/Aa s^^/Aaos/sy*/y /Ae a/7so/o^/a/ 7S. /aasA ^SSdo/s s^.^d)
/a/s S7,^^, 77j 7Sot?o^ /Ao/y^^/aA /a/S9
///A^ ^^/-/Ah^as/dT’/y d/“ a//Aa a^^^'/o/
^00^ /7aa /ia/ sacz/Asos/s/^yy a/ //a /Po/TA^as/sr/y
//A a /Aoraa/^j oeo//a AecM4pe/?s. s’ros/^r /Ao/
Ao/^/ O// so/{7 /a/ 77 /^A/cA //ss sao/Aoas/air/y
^ ^Aa ,Aoro//a/ sv/A? stoA / 7aa /aa /zoadA/yasA/^/y
a A A^a So<//aaas/ff/“/y AAd ^ dpy/os.s
\
1
j
Exhibit C
A driiiuige and utility easement over, under and across, those parts of Lot 58 and 77,
ORONO ORCHARDS, wtuch lie within a 10.00 foot strip of property, the centerline of
which is described as foDowi:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the southwesterly line of said Lot 77. and
a line drawn paraltd with and 1 7.00 feet northwesterly of the southeasterly of said
Lot 77; thence northeasterly, along said parallel line, to it’s intersection with the
northeasterly line of said Lot 77; thence southeasterly, along said northeasterly line
to the most easterly comer of said Lot 77, and there terminating.
A drainage and utility easement over, under and across, those parts of Lot 59 and 76,
ORONO ORCHARDS, which He within a 10.00 foot strip of property, the centerline of
which is described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the northeasterly line of said Lot 59. and
a line drawn paralld with and 1 7 00 feet southeasterly of the northwesterly line of
said Lot 59, thence southwesterly, along said parallel line, to it’s intersection with
the southwesterly line of said Lot 59; thence orthwesterly. along said
southwesterly line to the most westerly comer of said Lot 59, and there
terminating.
B
Application #2S/0
Date Received n A* w *^*/^^*^
Amount Paid ^ 3.*7^
CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ fPROPERTY LOCATION C ^ ^
Site address S***»'y** /fw's*/‘>ys , --------
Property Identification Number (PID) a ?->/<g^-//g: ::i3
Please check one - Property ^ abstract or____torrens? ^ ^
Attach legal description to applicatiorL
- 2.2
APPUCANT r ,
Name * £i.nrc^6*A h/M^rxn.^
Address
City
Phone (home) */v 3 - j’/j? <r
Zip £«^ Phone (work)
—OWNERttf different than applicant)
Name ^ ••
Address V'^f
City
Phone (home)
(attach list if more than one)
Zip 39/Phone (work)
EXISTING LAND USE
Number of Tax Parcels
Development Size
Present use (check)
Present Zoning District
Acres Dry Land
Acres Wet Land
Acres Total, all parcels
Residential; no. of units
Other (specify)_____
PROPOSAL
_____ Division for Tax Purposes
___ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites)
Subdivision for New Building Sites
_________Existing Units
________New Units
Total Units
LO
Number of Building Sites
&
Proposed Gross Density
Mir^um Lot Size
Proposed Use (check)
Units per___Acres
Sq. Ft. Dry Biuldable Land
Residential
5ft:;
Other (specify)
- .G>-> 5^807. 5 9u/iJ^ ifiO
0
2—> 5-?yos--5'
«# MAI*
W3C OS
OR
1CHAHD KAo
6IUN0 AVI
■IASCA
A^IOO
LAKERO
p
COLIN V
* ‘ ■ * »»V» »5
600 A
Olf
:iR Biking
V '/■■•■' 1 ^ ^ #,
Ir !5-:i
•
R®Gf
VAY
DNG
\
)
WOOD
HILL
AVE
'«•?:<•* .s’*
r*' ' ■r •____
Oil!Clib/
^ pir:30ij*
s ^ ^UJ S mJ J^j
$ ^ ui ui ^liXS
DCKEItOA S M
srasanr.-
Sim
\
ai^Lie
fMI
f*.--V ■’ii-'-' J r *t*. -i
i. .'-j "A
GREENTlf^^;
- X.V.v-i/.'.rjs.
f/'
I •* > ».* f ;• - ‘
/ ■ •••. :'?.v-t ‘''r-v ‘*v.v' .
SEE MAP 76
♦\II«MS
Horse:
7. i>:
I \ox
cn
3S-l/(-<a3-3^
<^)
rt\€a
Cp^
V nJ?'N.X X
\C«-
o'iL?
V'ft
M Ch
'^::j:::.ccc;7s
VVJ aCSAXD^Vy^^ 62
(32) ' /^.i5 (31) w
712!?.^^-
V X / 63
73 >< (*6Jfc>
(22)^X\j,
■■•••.(
■9.
. (I7j“..
\ • ^
ONO
^ 6A-//7-A3-«a^
GOLF COURSE
(UNPLATTED)
• •••
.**•• ’*• • . *. .*
• *.*•* •. .* .• *. •
'(18)
0/^ , .-r
c
)
iff
»•
f
.
jM¥ir janiMimf S‘S€^r
l■in» <>#
y#/^. 4^94
^1 i>i<■><>■<> 0^0 Am^a rnmyrnm
r4€€Arm0^
AmmAr^y
^0A90 ^mAAimmm^ifmA04mA»m
0/mtAmSm00^\0m^J
C/TYOFORONO
Am00A0 0 4bb,^f^
00A^ A00m^. H0f0^ 0f A000
^0»0 1^ Omm00 um0 M to#. C4^e^ 0/C00^
**0Ak 0 00100, A^mr^ 0m00»*Ato 0mr0t^
gjtwAm 40004 Ofmtm^mg'
uf '5** «^e-.4ii^ «
IV.00 !••« Ol ••!« t0K n, •• •••♦“'•^ •• jLll?5lJll*iA^
10 IHa *v*»» !*•••«»» If *••• •*• •••^ 1». 4l0m0 it0t4000
%\W
\
Iktnfei <4ftH^ lid IMi Mffoik olM 9
•ipaH »M OMMNi to M Of MiM «f
•m M m Oiii itoo I «• 0 to|^
’•2C?
wm^SLSL
0tft0» 4- 00- 00
tt44€
,4,^ jt^rA0^4fi4tt0ii
• /V*/7.'/^•‘••- A-tf ' A^’^*
#.v^^ \ 0 fr:0\>
'n
*.*« «.«••
ORONO, MINNESOTA
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
cma. 139101
RUN DATE *7/21/99
■ATCH S*1
PROr ADOR
ONNER NANE
TAKPAVER
NANE/AODR
PROP ADDR
OMNER NANE
TARPAVER
NANE/AODR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NANE
TARPAVER <
NANE/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NANE
TARPAVER
NANE/AODR
SR R2-117-2S 21 *0*2
99R9* SHITH AVE
T E A J N -HITCH
THONAS E t JOANNE H HITCH
99 SNXTH AVE
WAVZATA NN 55S91
SR R2-117-2S 21 0016
0*115 SHXTH AVE
CRAIG HERTZENBERO ETAl.
CRAXe HERTZEHBERG
IIS SNXTH AVE
WAVZATA NN S5S91
S* R2-117-2S 21 R02S
***** ORONO ORCHARD RD S
DOUGLAS E WHXTELEV ET AL
DOUGLAS E WHXTELEV R
CLAUDXA NVERS'WHXTELEV
6* ORONO ORCHARD RO
WAVZATA NN 55S91
S* 02-117-2S 21 R0S2
*01*0 ORONO ORCHARD RO
P S GOSHGARXAN ET AL
PETER S GOSHGARXAN
Am GOSHGARXAN
X** ORONO ORCHARD RD S
WAVZATA NN S5S91
HENNEPIN COUNTV PROPERTV XNFORHATXm SVSTEN
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
S* 02-117-23 21 *0*3
***60 SNXTH AVE
VIOLET H OLANPE TRUSTEE
VIOLET N GLAHPE
6* SNXTH AVE
WAVZATA NN 55S91
38 02-117-23 21 0017
0*125 SNXTH AVE
D J A P J HORNER
BRADLEY J A PANELA J HORNER
125 SNXTH AVE
WAVZATA NN 55391
SB 02-117-23 21 *026
*011* SHXTH AVE
J A FISK A J K FISK
JANES A A JENNIFER K FISK
11* SHXTH AVE
WAVZATA NN 55391
SB *2-117-23 21 *033
*012* ORONO ORCHARD RD S
LOUIS G HERCHANT A WIFE
LOUIS G HERCHANT
12* ORONO ORCHARD RD S
WAVZATA NN 55391
REPORT NO. PX9S56*!
PAGE 1
SB *2-117-23 21 ***4
***** SHXTH AVE
JANET A HCNXLLAN
JANET A NCNXLLAN
1274 TEALHOOD AVE
LONG LAKE NN 55356
3B 02-117-23 21 0*22
0*11* ORONO ORCHARD RD S
J L WVFFELS A H J WVFFELS
JANES L A HAUDC J WVFFELS
11* ORONO ORCHARD Ml S
WAVZATA NN 55391
SB *2-117-23 21 **S1
***95 SNXTH AVE
J A D AHLBERO
JANES H A DIANNE R AHLBERO
95 SNXTH AVE
WAVZATA NN 55391
SB *2-117-23 22 **•!
*•*3* ADDRESS UNASSIONED
STATE OF HXNN
STATE OF HXNN <DNR)
ILUCE LINE TRAXLI
PROP ADDR
OWNER NANE
TAXPAYER
NANE/AODR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NANE
TAXPAYER
NANE/AODR
SB *2-117-23 22 ***2
***15 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
P L SCHERER 800 SCHERER
PETER L A GERX 0 SCHERER
19*** 31ST PL N
PLVNOUTH NN
3B *2-117-23 22 0**5
0*265 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
VILLAGE OF ORONO
CITY OF ORONO
P 0 BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY NN 55323
SB *2-117-23 22 «**3
*•*3* ADDRESS UNASSXGNED
CARGILL NAC HILLAN JR ETAL
L0NCRXD6E ASSOCIATES
P 0 BOX 930* DEPT 28
HPLS NN 5544*
3* 02-117-23 22 0008
0**45 SNXTH AVE
D W A H R HUST
DAVID W A HEIDI R HUST
45 SHXTH AVE
WAVZATA NN 55391
38 *2-117-23 22 ***4
0**3* ADDRESS UNASSXGtSO
STATE OF NXNN
SnTE OF NXNN (DNRl
ILL*fZ LINE TRAXLI
SB 35-118-23 33 *0*4
0**25 ORONO ORCHARD RD N
K J A T B SPENCER
KEITH J A THERESA B SPENCER
25 ORONO ORCHARD RD N
LONG LAKE NN 55356
H
MM SATE «7/21/9«
BATCH SSI
HENNEEXN COUNTY PROPERTY XNPORHATXON SYSTEH
PROPERTY ONNERS LIST
REPORT NO. PXASMAl
PACE 2
PROP AOOR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NANE/AODR
SO SA-1 « 2S SS RMS
•■•SO paORESS UNASSI6NED
STATE .. NXNN
STATE OP NXNN IDNRl
ILUCE LINE TRAIL)
30 S5-110*2S S3 ••••
•••2S ORONO ORCHARD RD N
OLD ORCHARD FARH LLC
OLD ORCHARD FARH LLC
SO ORONO ORCHARD RD
WAYZATA HN 5SS9I
SO SS-110-2S SS ••!■
•••SR ORONO ORCHARD RD N
J L NURPHY OSS SHXTH
JANES NURPHY 0 SANDRA SHXTH
SR ORONO ORCHARD RD N
MAYZATA NN BSS9X
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/AOOR
SO S5-110-2S SO RROZ
•••SO ADDRESS UNASSXGNED
STATE OF NXNN
STATE OF NXNN (DNR)
ILUCE LINE TRAIL)
tH
TOTAL BATCH SRI •••22
X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF XNFORNATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST
OF NY KNOWLEDCE AND BELIEF
DATE IS*
H
COUNCIL MEETING
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
SEP 2 7 1999
CITY OF OHONU
DATE: 9/23/99
ITEM NO.: 5^
Department Approval:
Name Paul Weinberger
Title Zoning Administrator/Planner
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2516 Jeff Martineau
1420 Shoreline Drive
Variances and Request for sewer unit for lot not within the MUSA
Zoning District: LR-1 A One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre)
Lot Area:approximately 2.0 acres
Summary of Request:
In 1997 the residence was removed from the property. All that remains on the lot is a detached
garage and driveway. The applicant has applied to the City for variances to allow the lot to be
redeveloped as a residential site and to permit the detached garage on the property to remain. The
Code would not allow an accessory building to remain after the principal building has been removed
without the Council granting a variance. Applicant also requests variances from bluff setback to
permit a new residence to be constructed within the 30' bluff setback.
The property owners have also requested sewer serv ice to the property. The lot could not sustain two
suitable drainfield sites due to disturbed soils and steep slopes. The lot is adjacent to property served
by sanitary sewer. The Comprehensive Plan, to be adopted later this year, has proposed this lot as
one that will be within the MUSA. This is one of only a handful of Lake Minnetonka lots not yet
within the MUSA. Please refer to tlie attached MUSA maps indicating the location of the property
and its proximity to other MUS.A areas. The property owners have made the request to allow the
property to be redeveloped with sewer resulting from no drainfield sites being present on the lot.
Exhibits
A
B
C
D
Resolution
MUSA Map
Sewer Map
Staff Report
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On a vote of 4 to 2 the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the attached resolution
approving a bluff setback variance and average lakeshore setback variances to permit residential
construction on the property and to deny variances to allow an existing garage to remain within the
0-75' lakeshore setback. It is recommended the garage be relocated to the 75' setback allowed for
structure and hardcover.
The Planning Commission did have concerns regarding the location of the proposed residence within
the 30' top of bluff setback.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
To adopt or amend the attached resolution and to allow the property owners to use one of the fifty
sewer units provided to the City from the Met Council to provide service to a future residence.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution.
A
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C) (2), SECTION 10.22,
SUBDIVISION 1(B) AND TO DENY VARIANCES TO SECTION 10.09,
SUBDIVISION 9 (A); SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS
1 (A) AND 1 (B); AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (1)
AND TO PERMIT SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION TO
THE PROPERTY
FILE NO. #2516
WHEREAS, David Sill and Amanda Sill (hereinafter "the applicants") are
owners of the property located at 1420 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter
"the City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 2, Block 1, Dragonfly Hill, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter
"property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Plaiming Codes, the Orono Planning
Commission held a public hearing on September 20, 1999, at which times all persons
desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon;
and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (2) to permit construction of a new residence
on the lot encroaching 20' into the top of bluff setback. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to
permit the garage and residence to encroach into the average lakeshore setback; Section 10.09,
Subdivision 9 (A) to permit an accessory structure to remain on the lot without principal
structure. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) to permit a garage to remain within 75' of the
lakeshore. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit
1,236 s.f (4.01%) hardcover to permit the existing garage and driveway to remain in the 0-75'
lakeshore setback, where no hardcover is allowed; and
WHEREAS, the applicants have requested connection of sanitary sewer to the
property for a lot not within the MUSA boundary; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
Page 1 of 5
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2516.
2. The property is located in the LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning
District.
3.
4.
D.
The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 20,
1999 and recommended approval on a vote of 4 to 2 for a variance for bluff
setback and to deny variances based upon the following findings:
A. A previous residence was located on the property until 1997 following
voluntary removal by the property owner.
B. The property is narrow with a limited building pad. The proposed house
location best utilizes the existing building pad and area of disturbed soil.
C. A house located behind the bluff setback would encroach into the
required 50' rear yard setback from County Road 15.
Existing soils and extreme slopes will not support two drainfield sites on
the property. Property owners have requested the City of Orono jq)prove
extending sanitary sewer to the site.
E. A garage is located within 75 ’ of the lakeshore. The building was
required to be removed following removal of the principal structure. The
Planning Commission has recommended the garage be relocated behind
the 75' lakeshore setback.
F. The garage and residence are proposed to be located on the lot well
screened by topography and natural vegetation not impacting lake views
for the marina or other residential properties.
The City Council finds the property is not within the MUSA, however it is
located immediately adjacent to sewered property within the MUSA. The
Comprehensive Plan recognizes Lake Minnetonka lakeshore properties as a
priority for providing sewer service. The proposed Comprehensive Plan indicates
Page 2 of 5
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
the subject lot is scheduled to be in the Urban Service Area following adoption.
Provision of sanitary sewer requires the City provide one sewer unit to the lot
located outside of the MUSA.
Following adoption of the Comprehensive Plan the sewer unit will not be
required to provide service to the lot.
The lot is 2.0 acres in size and is located in the LR-IA zoning district requiring
2 acres per building lot. Subdivision would not be allowed on this property
unless the lot would be rezoned. The Comprehensive Plan has guided the lot
for two acre density.
Due to slope and disturbed soils the lot can not demonstrate two suitable
drainfield sites.
The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety
and welfare of the community.
Page 3 of 5
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (2) to permit
construction of a new residence on the lot encroaching 20' into the top of bluff setback. Section
10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit the garage and residence to encroach into the average
lakeshore setback; and denies variances to Section 10.09, Subdivision 9 (A) to permit an
accessory structure to remain on the lot without principal structure. Section 10.22, Subdivision
1 (A) to permit a garage to remain within 75' of the lakeshore. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1
(B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit 1,236 s.f. (4.01%) hardcover to permit
the existing garage and driveway to remain in the 0-75' lakeshore setback, where no hardcover
is allowed based on the following conditions:
1.
3.
4.
5.
A compliant sewage disposal system is located on the property or property is
allowed to connect to sanitary sewer prior to building permit being issued for
principal residence.
Garage is removed or placed behind the 75' lakeshore setback.
Sanitary sewer plans are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and
Director of Public Services prior to building permit.
Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a
building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance
will expire on that date (September 27, 2000).
Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
Page 4 of 5
I
3. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and
assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title
of the property.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular
meeting held on the 27th day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Property Owner (s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of
September, 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
Notary Public
Page 5 of 5
I I JI__II
z ^artX>PartXXn"'
I______
Part XXV
Part XXIV,
Part XVII
r~\
Part VI
?v\v;$A
Part XXVn/ T^i^nage,
Lake.
?artXII CPartVm
p^vn
J
1
I
I
WD5A •SuBjecT
Lot j^. OacKes^
W V
Part XXVI
Part XVm
Part XXVIII
c?I [73
p
F
P
P
P
P
P
P.
P;
gl
8|"0 „v
I’-
1^ 131;^%Msil!!l ■■
z>I 5?- IK W
--------------------------------------------
iHtaggi ■
....—
Siria
.riiiP
TA^sVyi Ml tasjz 09^
lilS
PI
li/JBltV^
5 J
! <
i«is
W2!^wm%TA4i«
1 I r
sliS
^ I
7
» —
:S^a=
■ a fiM|ilB a
■ S IIIIMI Hill m■ ■ rilia mmma P S .J
C>
' S"&»
•N
\
/ »
If
a ?,
J i:-'
B
o
o
55????????????? . . . .|gag|PS§|ga><s|SS<3B = -
?SB?P?255595Iff II .1 P'3 r ° '
5l
I ‘iiit,*
*TJ ^O. S E
> .
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner
September 9,1999
#2516 Jeff Martineau
1420 Shoreline Drive
Variances —Public Hearing
Zoning District: LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre)
Lot Area:approximately 2.0 acres
Last month the Planning Commission tabled Zoning Application #2416 for Jeff Martineau without
discussion. Mr. Martineau arrived shortly after the meeting had adjourned.
Summary of Request:
In 1997 the residence was removed from the property. All that remains on the lot is a detached
garage and driveway. The applicant has applied to the City for variances to allow the lot to be
redeveloped as a residential site and to permit the detached garage on the property to remain. The
Code wo'ild not allow an accessor>' building to remain after the principal building has been removed
without the Council granting a variance. Applicant also requests variances from bluff setback to
permit a new residence to be constructed within the 30' bluff setback.
Lot History:
The lot was 2.9 acres in size prior to 1983 when .9 acres was divided off and joined with an adjacent
property leaving the existing 2.0 acre parcel. Previous property owners have inquired about
extension of sewer to the property. This is one of the few lakeshore lots in the City that is not within
the MUSA area to allow for the provision of sanitar>' sewer. There is interest in connecting this
property to sewer. Sewer connection would require the property demonstrate it is not suitable for
a primary and alternate septic site, or apply for a MUSA expansion which would require approval
of the City and Metropolitan Council.
92516 JeffSfurttneau
1420 Shoreline Drhe
yartancts
8/l6^V9
?Q& 1
Lakeshore Setback
Tanager Lake is located on the west side of the property and Brown's Bay of Lake Minnetonka is on
the east side of the property across Shoreline Drive. The lot has two 0-75' lakeshore setback zones.
There is a small portion of the driveway within the setback along the east side of the property.
Obviously this amount of hardcover (120 s.f.) is required for driveway access to the property from
Shoreline Drive.
A garage and small portion of driveway is located within Uie 75' lakeshore setback on the northwest
comer of the property. This building was required to be removed whcu 'he p^ncipal residence was
removed from the property. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 prohibits acLCSsury buildings on lots
absent a principal structure. It could be assumed the garage would not require a hardcover variance
at this time because it is a legally existing non-conforming building, however it may be appropriate
to grant the variance for hardcover if the Planning Commission and Council determines the building
can remain on the lot.
Bluff Setback
A bluff rises from the Tanager Lake shoreline to approximately to the 960' contoui . The Shoreland
Ordinance requires a minimum setback of 30' to the top of bluff for a structure. Refer to the attached
survey/site plan (Exhibit D) the plan indicates a limited building pad on the property outside of
required setbacks and allowing for a 30' top of bluff setback. Surveyor has depicted on the survey
a proposed house layout over the high point on the property that could not meet the bluff setback.
The residence however would be within the actual building pad on the property as defined by the
typical yard setbacks (absent the bluff setback).
A variance may be appropriate in this case to allow building within 30' of the top of bluff setback
due to the limited building pad on the 2.0 acre property. The proposed location of the residence
would take advantage of the previous building pad and not require the removal of trees necessary
for protection of the property between the proposed house and Shoreline Drive. Building in the
proposed location would also allow a future property owner to take advantage of building over the
highest portion of the property.
If a house were built further to the north on the lot the existing drive would be required to be
realigned and result in removal of mature trees and some extensive regrading.
Septic
It is unknown if the property could sustain two conforming septic sites. The steep grades and
lakeshore setbacks may require the property owners to request sewer extension from the City
Council. The property is outside of the MUSA area, but to its benefit it is adjacent to other sewered
properties and is a lakeshore lot.
1^2516 Jeff Martineau
1 420 Shoreline Drive
Vartances
8/16^99
Page!
a.M'U'wnt V ^'ikl t
Hardcover
Mark Gronberg has completed proposed hardcover calculations and has demonstrated the property
could sustain and house and garage combination close to 5,000 s.f. without requesting any variances.
The existing drive would meet City requirements and require only a small amount of grading on the
property.
Distance
from
Shoreline
Total Area in
Setback
Existing
Hardcover
Allowed
Hardcover
Proposed
Hardcover
Variance Requested
0'-75'
Tanager
Lake
1,236 s.f 1,236 ^.f
(4.0%)
none
(0%)
1,236 s.f
(4.0%)
All hardcover in this
setback is existing and
is not scheduled for
removal
0'-75'
Brown's
Bay
4,800 s.f 120 s.f
(2.5%)
none
(0%)
120 s.f
(2.5%)
Hardcover is required
for existing driveway
75’-250'
Proposed
48,400 s.f
r
approx.
12%
12,100 s.f
(25%)
11,205 s.f
(23.15%)
No variance would be
requested for hardcover
within the 75'-250'
lakeshore setback
Issues for Discussion
1.The property has a limited building pad for a two acre lot due to the increased impact of the
top of bluff setback. The applicant has requested a variance to allow an encroachment into
the 30' setback.
40-
3.
4.
A garage structure is located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback. The building by Code
should have been removed at the time the property owner voluntarily removed the residence
in 1997. The applicant intends to maintain the building at its present site.
The lot is subject to two 75' lakeshore setback zones.
The variance from bluff setback would allow the property to be developed over the area
already graded by the existing hou.se. The area is clear of trees and driveway alignment is
established.
^2516 Jeff Martmeau
1420 Shoreline Drive
yariances
8/16^99
Page I
• I
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the variances to permit encroachment into the top of bluff
setback to permit a new residence to be constructed on the site over the previous building site
based on the following hardships:
1.The proposed location of the residence would take advantage of the previous building pad
and not require the removal of trees necessary for protection of the property between the
proposed house and Shoreline Drive. Building in the proposed location would also allow a
future property owner to take advantage of building over the highest portion of the property.
If a house were built further to the north on the lot the existing drive would be required to
be realigned and result in removal of mature trees and some extensive regrading.
Attachments
- all ararf*-
Wi *s
A
B
C
D
E
G
H
I
Application
Applicant's Statement of Hardship
Survey
Location Map
Topographic Map
Hardcover Worksheets
Plat Map
Property Owners List
Permit Record
5^1^
^2516 Jejf Kfartineau
1420 Shoreline Dnve
Variances
8/l6m
Page 4
f
AppUeation # ^ V
Date ReceivedF ’7/z.iMt
Amount Paid t
CITY OF ORONO - Vi^IANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee C$250.Q^
(S50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $150.00
(no change from ori^al application)
Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Site Address /^20 ____/--------------------------------------
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)_____^^---------------------------------
Attach legal description to^pUcati^^^not included on required survey. ( th/ )
liiDate Property Acquired______
I (dd) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
Present use of property: readendal ___other (specify).
Zoning District; ^ 1A________________________
APPLICANT
Name
Address: J7
Phone (horne d
____ Phone (work)_^[7_2iZ££.£_^
City: _______Zip:
Phone (horne d *^7^3 S
Address t-fDOlf^Qo TCAH City: fAtn Zip:xr..~
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $,
Describe request in detail; . c Buiff- 'TO
A,»(.,A1 rrMLI,C« A't fX/fTM/g
(attach additional sheets if necessary)itnf‘L. .V C./
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area
Setback:
___Lot Width
Front Side
Hardcover
Rear ‘
Lot Covera
Averap<* Lakeshore
Other (specify) BiCiff
HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventmg
compliance with Zoning Code requirements:
PPtr yf'/^/Uck ' or Acgfr ffr/ACk
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
JEFF MARTINEAU
OF LOT 2. BLOCK 1. DRAGONFLY HILL
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
. . ---------------
Mal DCSCfff»TCN or
Thol port of Lot 2 NorIhwfslertjr of t^f Sootf'roiieftjf
37 03 foot Ihoroof. ®o<k I. Orogonfly Kl
Oooolft iron rnorhtr
thown oro bo»«J upon or« Oot*^
TNt intondt to t^o» lh« Pou^»«* of Iho obovt o«»cf6e<J prop««'t)f.
ttio locotion of on gorogo thoroon. II doo* not p^rperl to lf»o«r
ony othor lmpro»o#wti or orKroocHmonl*
HARDCOVTRIIA: RCA L&U L^cri o^n Avc /rksheet 7 -Zf-9 i
)•: -250'SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) (0-75;)
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ^^rr^'CAXf MTHa)
A House ____________ >; _________1
250-500'500-1000'
Length
N
\
\
B. Garage
C. Driveway X
\
D. Sidewalk X
X
E. Patio/Deck X
X
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
X
X
X
G. Other
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A ___ - D
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A House _____________
Length
X
X
X
B. Garage
C. Driveway X
X
b. Sidewalk X
X
E. Patio/Dcck X
X
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
0. Other
W;dlh
X 100
U'id!)l
a
s
a
TOTAL HARDCOVER 11’. ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
- U X 100
13
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
/2 0 S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
SJ.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
i
/to S.F. A
^POO SI. B
2, SO %
rr^- -;
•i..
A fc
,!
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.a
S.F.
S.F. A
S.F. B
%
/■//ihr/AyC/n^f (S/cl)
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
75-250’ 250-500'SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) Co-7<D U/( S r
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
500-1000'
A House \
Length
Not4j( r. z
B. Garage
C. Driveway
7a. V
N
\
D. Sidewalk \
\
E. Patio/Deck \
\
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
X
\
X
G. Other
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONT
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A - fl
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A House X
Length
\
S
X
B. Garage
C. Driveway \
X
D. Sidewalk X
a •
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
G. Othc
Width
V.^
n
s
7 0.2.
X 100
Widtli
ss
a
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A - 13 X ICO
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
2.2. .S.F.
S.F.<f/y
600 S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
ST.
S.F.
/ 2.P6 S.F.
30.J?oo S.F.
__V.o/ Vo
S.F.
ST.
S.F.
■ST.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
ST.
ST.
»/o
1
A
B
pi
S.F. J-
• Ir;
f‘ ■*
/• . ' •/ , *
A
B
A/A/'^! (JyLtJ
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* (55^2^ 250.500’500-1000’
A Hou^ic \=S.F.j
Length
V
Wid’Jl
S.F.
1
!
\=S.F.
\=S.F.
B. Garase \S.F.!
f
C. Driveway \
_S.F.t
- • i
\a S.F.
I
I
D. Sidewalk \a S.F.1
\=5 S.F.\
\
E. Patio/Deck S.F.
\=S.F.1
F. Landscape \mm S.F.
Underlain \=S.F.
Bv Plastic \=S.F.
Or Fabric
G. Other \»S.F.
• • •
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE •S.F.A
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •S.F.B
A - H X100 »%
•
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A House ^ 2.V =S.F.y 1
Lcn^
X mm /2 0 0 S.F.J [
\=SJ.
• ^ • *X =■S.F.
B. Garaw 3 2.\2V --7^«P S.F.
C. Driveway X SJ*iO S.F.
=S.F.m
D. Sidewalk S.F.toX=S.F.
E. PaUd?6^ / ^\//_/cs SJ.. .}
2 o \/y =l9 c ST 1" i
F. Landscape X a S.F.
Underlain X a S.F.■ "x
By Plastic X =S.F.
Or Fabric 1V
G. Other X =S.F.‘ \ T
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZOM;
•
•
//, Z 05 Sf.
*/S. S.F.
A - l»X100 =/5 Vo L.
ta
13
. certificate of survey for
J£fF MARTINEAU
OF LOT 2. BLOCK 1. DRAGONFLY HILL
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
S sow 00" E 151.92
O'-'x
y.''x>^Vx
/ -V N \
\ ^ ^S
\ * \ 1 I . ^ »
1 ! X V^< \OR ainacc Ii '\ *AVio '
E A S C M t Hh/ ^ 0> .
D'A'-'V
" 8 ___________________\
APPROX14ATE
NCMMAL
'-V+'
1'. 'Ife'AWv,
fete
om-Ofic ^ ______;____
V - SETBACK ^ ^ I
' |\ I !
-1
tx
y
;\\ LINE\
legal d£scr »^tk)n or pr^EMises
Thot port of Lot 2 lying Northwesterly of the Southeosterly
37.03 feet thereof. Block 1. Dro^jonfly HiU.
------4s#----------t^fff cw^t^ul MiA>« if4 iCv(L OAr«MM
denotes iron morker
Btorir>gs shown ore bosed upon on assumed datum
ThJS survey inter>ds to show the bourKjories of the obove described property
ond the locotion of on esisting goroge thereon. It does not purport to show
ony other improverr>ents or erKroochments
I'
I trt
ft\
s.
/
lU I
lOi
/
I.; /\ Ittn —I-
L/' A'/'L"'?S'
\
6l*
mmcRT u€ or^lot t won I
mJN DATE 17/19/99
MTCN 511
HENNEfIN COUNTY fItOPEIITY INFORNATION SYSTEM
PfrOPEETY OWNEES LIST
PEOP ADDE
OUrnE NAME
TANPAYEE
NANE/ADOE
PEOP ADDE
ONNEE NAME
TAKPAYEE
NANE/ADDE
PEOP ADDE
ONNEE NAME
TAKPAYEE
NANE/ADDE
PEOP ADOE
OUNCE NAME
TAKPAYEE
NANE/ADDE
S8 82-117-23 33 0018
01910 SNOEELXNE DE
A HAEEISON OIL KAEEISON
ALFEED 8 INGEID L HAEEISON
1910 SHOEELINE DE
HAYZATA NN 55391
30 11-117-23 22 0009
01990 SHOEELINE DE
JANES P EXVEES ETAL
JANES P EIVEES
1999 SHOEELINE DE
KAYZATA NN 55391
30 11-117-23 22 0007
00030 AOOEESS UNASSIONCD
J P t N A EIVEES
JANES P t NAEY A EIVEES
1999 SHOEELINE DE
HAYZATA NN 55391
30 11-117-23 22 0019
01932 SHOEELINE DE
L E 1 J L OOEN TEUSTEES
LAUEEN E 0 JOYCE L OOEN
1932 SHOEELINE DE
HAYZATA NN 55391
30 02-117-23 33 0012
00030 ADDEESS UNASSIGNED
THE CITY OF OEONO
CITY OF OEONO
P 0 OOK 00
CEYSTAL DAY NN 55323
30 11-117-23 22 0005
01992 SHOEELINE DE
JANES P EIVEES ETAL
JANES P EIVEES
1999 SHOEELINE DE
HAYZATA NN 55391
30 11-117-23 22 0010
00030 ADDEESS UNASSIGNEO
J P 0 N A EIVEES
JANES P I NAEY A EIVEES
1999 SHOEFLINE DE
HAYZATA NN 55391
30 11-117-23 22 0015
01920 SHOEELINE DE
S 0 8 A D SILL
STEVEN 0 8 ANANDA D SILL
1920 SHOEELINE DE
HAYZATA NN 55391
EEPOET NO. PI935901
PAGE 93
30 11-117-23 21 0001
00030 ADDEESS PENDING
6ENHAE INDUSTEIES INC
KINGS COVE BOAT SALES INC
ATTN STEVE BATES
9 STATE HHY NO 61
HASTINGS NN 55033
30 11-117-23 22 0006 *
01999 SHOEELINE DE
J P 8 N A EIVEES
JANES P 8 NAEY A EIVEES
1999 SHOEELINE DE
HAYZATA NN 55591
30 11-117-23 22 0013
00030 ADDEESS UNASSIGNED
THE CITY OF OEONO
CITY OF OEONO
P 0 BOX 66
CEYSTAL BAY NN 55323
TOTAL BATCH 511 00011
I CEETIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AID) TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORNATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE EECOEDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPAETNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST
OF NY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF.
DATE
' j
If
-
0*
H
nJ
'I
I ;
PERMIT RECORD
IH^O
«♦. !
Permit No.Date Type of Permit
/06V /90G/T/dAJ
S'-S-tS’ScLui^r-tf'
603 .../i -«6'S:3
___//'jV'?*?OJjO
- (.Q(b ---------Q^Uba^ _'"^4^os: __..1-3-9^
__ /-3.5:'Vo •'Tlte^
3 \^tk SuJ^/Uk^^
7' fA &L ^
3
W(p<j6 /7- <7-47
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
••
•
Application Date:
Completion Date:
60 Day Deadline:
8/23/99
8/25/99
10/24/99
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 11 1999
CITY OF OHONU
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: 9/22/99
ITEM NO.: I
Department Approval:
Name Kris Jenson
Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda SectL >n:
Item Description: t^2519 Matthew & Robin Staloch
4705 Watertown Road
Vari''atce--Public Hearing
Zoning District: <Jl-1A One Family Rural Residential District (5 Acres)
Lot Area:5.6 Acres
Application: The applicant has proposed to construct a horse bam between the principal
structure and the street. This lot is approximately 350' wide and 700' deep, and the house sits at the
rear of the property, only 61.8' from the rear property line. The west property line is Painters Creek
Due to the house location and the creek, the only feasible plac'' to locate the bam is along the
driveway in the center of the lot. The area between the bam/driveway area and the east property line
will serve as the pasture ar^a for the horse. The proposed building is 28' x 40', and meets all other
setback standards for oversized stmctures. This site, even with the proposed horse bam, is at 0%
hardcover within the 0'-75' zone, falls under 10% hardcover within the 75'-250' zone, and 19%
within the 250'-500' zone.
This application requires the following vainance approval:
1.Variance from Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D): To permit constmction of a 28' x 40'
accessory structure between the pr i .ipal building and the street.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommended by 6 to 0 vote to;
Approve the application as presented.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To approve th» enclosed resolution.
COUNCU. ACTION REQUESTED
To adc p or amend the enclosed resolution.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
VARIANCES TO
MUNICIPA!. ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 9 (D)
FILE #2519
WHEREAS, Matthew A. Staloch and Robin J. Staloch (hereinafter "the
applicants") are owners of the property' located at 4705 Watertown Road within the City ot
Orono (hereinafter "City") and leg^ly described as follows;
Exhibit A attached, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning
Commission held a public hearing on September 20, 1999, at which times all persons desiring
to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to permit construction of a 28'x40 ’ accessory
structure between the principal building and the street where no accessory structures are to be
allowed.
Minnesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2519.
2. The property is located in the RR-IA Zoning District, where 5 acres or 217,800
s.f. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of 5.6 acres or 245,000 s.f.
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 20, 1999 and
recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0.
Page 1 of 7
4, The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact:
5.
6.
A. The bam meets all required setbacks for a building with animal uses.
B.The lot is within the setback for Painter's Creek. The bam is outside the
100 foot setback required for structures from the creek.
C.Oversized accessory structures require a resuictive covenant be placed on
the chain of title alerting future propert>* owners of conditions on the
property.
D. Horses are a permitted use in the RR-IA Zoning District.
E.Location of the house wculd not allow a building location for a bam
without a variance.
The City Council finds that the conditions e.xisting on this property arc peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety
and welfare of the community.
Page 2 of 7
CONCLUSIONS, ORDEK AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to permit
construction of an accessory structure between the principal building and the street. Approval
was subject to the following conditions:
1.Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached
to this resolution as Exhibit B. Any amendments to the site plan may require
further Planning Commission and City Council review.
3.
4.
5.
Property owaiers file a restrictive covenant on the lot for an oversized accessory
structure.
Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and musi be exercised by application for a
building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance
will expire on that date (September 27, 2000;.
Violation of or non-complian#; with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and
assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of
the property.
Page 3 of 7
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Property Owner(s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknow'lcdged before me on this 27th day of
September, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 7
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199 _before me a Notary Public within
and for said county, personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instniment.and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as His (their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within
and for said county, personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instniment.and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBUC
Page 5 of 7
N
if*
44- O K it s-
^1 <r%•ft?
to
€fl
toa
m«
iitw
TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commissioners
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Kris Jenson, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner
September 7,1999
#2519 Matthew & Robin Staloch, 4705 Watertown Road
Variance-Public Hearing
(S)
Zoning:RR-IA, 5 Acre District
Application: To allow a horse bam to be constructed between the principal residence and the street.
STAFF SUMMARY
The applicants have requested a variance to permit the construction of a horse bam between
the principal structure and the street. This lot is approximately 350' wide and 700' deep, and the
house sits at the rear of the property, only 61.8' from the rear property line. The west property line
is Painters Creek. Due to the house location and the creek, the only feasible place to locate the bam
is along the driveway in the center of the lot. The area between the bam/driveway area and the east
property line will ser\’e as the pasture area for the horse. The proposed building is 28' x 40', and
meets all other setback standards for oversized stmctures. This stmcture will be located more than
75' from the nearest property line, and over 150' from the applicant's home, as well as the
neighboring homes at 4765 Watertown Road and 630 Deborah Drive. The North lot line of this
property is Painters Creek, and therefore the property falls unders Shoreland Regulations and
hardcover requirements. This site, even with the prop>osed horse bam, is at 0% hardcover within the
0'-75' zone, falls under 10% hardcover within the 75'-250' zone, and 19% within the 250'-300' zone.
Pertinent Ordinance
Section 10.03 General Provisions, Subd. 9, Accessory Buildings (C) Area Restrictions, (3)(a): No
such accessory structure shall be located within a required yard area (principal structure setbacks
must be met). Further, no such structure shall be nearer the front lot line than the front lot line of
the principal residence on the property, md no such accessory structure shall be located less than 30'
from the side or rear lot line regardless whether less strict principal structure setbacks apply.
^2519 Matihew A Robin Staloch 4705 H'atertown Road
Variance
September 7, 1999
page-1
I iirtiMiiiti I II I irmm
' I
t
ANALYSIS
RR-1A District Requirements
Lot Area lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard
5 acres 300'100'100'50'
Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard
Acres 300'580' to house,
200+' to bam
61.8*68', 165'
This lot conforms to required lot width, lot area, front and side yard requirements.
Issues
1.The applicant's are in the process of identifying the secondary septic site on the property. A
mound system was put in a 3'ear ago when the applicant's moved into the property, however
a secondary site was not indicated in our records. Staff wants to ensure that the secondary
site is not located within the bam or pasture area, in order to maintain the integrity of the site.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the variance to allow construction of a 28' x 40' accessory
structure between the principal building and the street.
Exhibits:
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Application
Location Map
Plat Map
Survey
Elevation Drawings
Neighboring Property Owners List
Hardcover Calculations
§2519 Mattfww d Robin Staloch 4705 IVaiertown Road
yarianc1^
September 7, 1999
page-2
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $250.00
($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $150.00
(no change from ori^al application)
Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00
Afrer-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Site Address HlO^
Application#
Date Recehed^EUlHS
Amount Paid '^*'2^:0 .^
UAC •
icnn‘\’
Property Identification Number fP.I.D.I Ztll ______
Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
Date Property Acquired,Q8 (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
Present use of property: readenfial ___pother (specify)
Zoning District: L _______________________
APPLICANT ^
Name ncb.S-TdJorin
Phone (home ) > V ?(/:-• iCt • - : - ?
Phone (work )
Address: U !( '<=- i>JrvWv-4T>,. ^ (? r) City: o K ca Jq Zip:
OWNER (if different than applicant)
Name < /i \
Phone (home).
Phone (work).
. __J
Address:City:Zip:.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost
Describe request in detail: ~Tn do.nstv-o^,V
' - > Of
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
VAKIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width
Setback: Front Side
Hardcover
Rear
Lot Coverage
Average Lakeshore
Other (specify)
HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing
compliance wth Zoning Code requirements:
<' O I'L . -L* ;'»■»“*-» ^ P ^
(^) s
^ooc w» !
ftmesB I
■53133
-------------2jr.«3
X
2
5'
NeQ*4«*»*W 343 ?1
^ s#. X
<
•^N>»
^/. hS.A3-^3l
fK
;i
inz
^ - /;:<;:;:r<-::;:;V::::x:;:x:::x
/;x:v;:;;:::;;>:;v;::x|;::!:!;::;
av
I I •
::::::::::::::>x:v::>;::x:x::i:;
«••••■•••••«•■•*• 5
Va7
::x:::x:;:x:::x:x:;:x>xJ
• • • «•••«■•••••••••* <
•••••••••«•«•€••• >J
..................
24 32 .^ ^21.06
v-s B-32S
V.
.0}
/
"'•1
44V05
T9* >2
1
/i
aw-14
I*.
1
U O ■ "
7T
fl
M n«i
•N •
ou)
\
X
V.
\
5 ^oH
ibirrM
y
IT
: I
i U-
r. J
\
X
01 X
5tfc *
vl
i\\
' • i 1
A / >* r "
1
1
<L
.1
*
-I
« « «•
vulr\ci#ul
.1 • -1
t
i~
I.-
I —^
5A6T
rr:-
• 1
1
1 "
i»*» • ^ (
;
* -
.
.-i—.
r-|
i
^ •
—. -,
r-
c
___
• «
-tV
RUN DATE aa/17/M
BATCH 506
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
REPORT NO. PIOS5601
PAGE 20
PROP AODR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADDR
S8 S1-116-2S 22 0002
00705 WATERTOWN RD
DENNIS GENE ESTERLY
DENNIS GENE ESTERLY
0705 WATERTOWN RD
HAPLE PLAIN HN 55559
56 51-116-25 22 0005
00705 WATERTOWN RD
H A STALOCH 0 R J STALOCH
HATTHEW A I ROBIN J STALOCH
0705 WATERTOWN RD
HAPLE PLAIN HN 55559 .
56 51-116-25 22 0005
00720 WATERTOWN RD
ROBERT L PIERCE ETAL
ROBERT L PIERCE
0720 WATERTOWN RD
HAPLE PLAIN HN 55559
PROP AODR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADDR
56 51-116-25 22 0006
00660 WATERTOWN RD
H W 0 S E LURTON
H W LURTON I S E LURTON
5155 JAHESTOWN RD
LONG LAKE HN 55556
58 51-118-25 22 0008
00650 DEBORAH DR
G T KARLEN t H J KARLEN
GREGORY T KARLEN
650 DEBORAH DR
HAPLE PLAIN HN 55559
56 51-118-25 25 0005
00560 DEBORAH DR
W G LUTH 8 J HARCOUX LUTH
W G LUTH I J HARCOUX LUTH
560 DEBORAH DR
HAPLE PLAIN HN 55559
•. i
) ,
PROP ADOR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADDR
0007
6
70 56-118-26 11
06825 CO RD NO
BARBARA J LEPKY
BARBARA J LEFKY
6625 CO RD NO 6
HAPLE PLAIN HN 55559
70 56-118-26 16 0002
00070 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
W G LUTH 0 J HARCOUX LUTH
W 6 LUTH 0 J HARCOUX LUTH
560 DEBORAH DR
HAPLE PLAIN HN 55559
TOTAL BATCH 506 00006
' :■I
■ i
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AH ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHEHT OF PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST
OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
DATE
#25
• i
T\
r.
haedcover calculation worksheet
SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ (" 75-250’ 250-500’500-1000’
f.YTSTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House ______________ X
Length
X
X
X
B. Garage
C. Driveway X
X
D. Sidewalk X
X
E. Paiio/Deck X
X
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
X
X
X
G. Other
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A ___________ B .
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House
Leagth
*-//
X
X
X
B. Garage
C. Driveway rUr.L' /
D. Sidewalk X
X
E. Patio/Dcck X
X
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
X
X
X
G. Other
Width
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A_ _ _ _ __ ® -
10
xlOO .
Width
1/)’
6
6/i
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
9icCO S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
r
r i
S.F. A
S.F. B
%
S.F.
W2L
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
XlOO 0)
S.F.
%
• •• •:u •
SETBACK ZO?«:; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’
f YTjrriNG HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House ___________■ X
hardcover calculation WORRSHEEET^
75-250’ <^250-500;^500-1000’
(hr
(Sifei
Leofex Widi
B. Gaxase
* •
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landses^e
Uaderlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
G. Other
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A B xlOO
PROPOSED HARDCOVl^ IN ZONE
A. House
Leogtfi
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Dcck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or Fabric
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.•
S.F.
S.F.
c.
I- C c
ms
G. Ocher
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A_ _ _ _ _ __ S .
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
%
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
¥
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.»
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
XlOO
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
5S
Application Date:
Completion Date:
60 Day Deadline:
8/18/99
8/18/99
10/17/99
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 2 7 1999
CITY OF onono
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: 9/22/99
ITEM NO.7
Department Approval:
Name Kris Jenson
Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Item Description: #2520 Tom B. Berthiaume
3035 Casco Point Road
Variance-Public Hearing
Zoning District: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 Acre)
Lot Area:24,130 s.f.
Application: The applicant has proposed to extend the eaves on one side of the home to
extend over a sidewalk alongside the house. The extension would be supported by posts, and be 30'
in length. It would not extend the full length of the house on that side, only long enough to cover
the sidewalk to the side entrance. The proposed remodeling would move the sidewalk up against
the house and under the extended eaves, and then using the remainder of the area for
landscaping/grass. The applicant seeks approval of a variance for side yard setback and for
hardcover coverage in the 75'-250' (reduced from existing) lakeshore setback area.
This application requires the following variance approval:
1.Variance from Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) : To permit a sideyard setback variance to
allow an additional 2' of root overhang to cover a sidewalk.
2.Variance from Section 10.22. Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2): To
permit a hardcover variance to allow 6,221 s.f. (57.6%) in the 75’-250' lakeshore setback area
where 2,700 s.f (25%) is allowed.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to:
Approve the application as presented.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To approve the enclosed resolution.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
VARIANCES TO
MUNICn>AL ZONLNG CODE
SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B);
SECTION 10.22, SUBDFVISION 2; AND
SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L)(2)
FILE #2520
WHEREAS, Tom B. Berthiaume (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the
property located at 3035 Casco Point 7:oad within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and
legally described as follows;
All of Tract A, Registered Lard Survey No. 394 except that part lying Northerly of the
following described line: Beginning at the Southeasterly comer of Tract B in said
Registered Land Survey; thence Southwesterly along a line drawn through a point on
the base line as shown on said Registered Land Survey, 80 feet Northwesterly from its
intersection with the Southeasterly line of said Tract A, to the shore of Lake
Minnetonka, and there terminating, files of Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County,
Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning
Commission held a public hearing on September 20, 1999, at which times all persons desiring
to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit extension of eaves located on one side
of the house, per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) to
allow 6,221 s.f (57.6%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback area where 6,293 s.f
(58 27%) exists and 2,700 s.f (25%) is allowed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota;
Page 1 of 6
1.
2.
3.
FINDINGS
This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2520.
The property is located in the LR-IC, Zoning District where .5 acres or 21,780
s.f. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of .56 acres or 24,130
s.f.
The Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 20, 1999 and
recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0.
4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact
The roof line would be extended approximately 2 feet.
B The sidewalk is currently located under the roof line and creates a
hazardous situation when roof runoff occurs.
C. All landscape plastic will be removed upon completion of the addition.
The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety
and welfare of the community.
Page 2 of 6
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit
extension of eaves located on one side of house and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and
Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to allow 6,221 s.f (57.6%) hardcover in the 75-250'
lakeshore setback area. Approval was subject to the following conditions:
1.
3.
Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant attached
to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan and/or
hardcover may require further Planning Commission and City Council review.
2. Underlain plastic shall be completely removed from the property.
Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant,
but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building
permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will
expire on that date (September 27, 2000).
Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
5.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the
property.
Page 3 of 6
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of September, 1999,
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Property Owner(s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of
September, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 6
STATE OF ?VflNNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199 before me’a Notary Public within
and for said county, personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199 _before me a Notary Public within
and for said county, personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBUC
Page 5 of 6
■ ■■if ■irm
0)
OQ
O
»-h
l£GAl DESCaiPTIOli Of P»£M!SES SURVEYED;
All Of Tract A, Rt9lsttrrd land 5urv.»y do. 3f4 exctpi inat
part lying Northtrly of iht following dascrlptd lint:
Beginning at tht Vouthtasttrly corner of Trect B In said
Registered land Survey; thence Southwesterly along a line
drawn through a point on the base line as shown on said
Registered land Survey. 80 feet Northwesterly froai Its Inter
section with the Southeasterly line of said Tract A, to the
shore of lake HInnetonka. and there terminating, files of
Registrar of Titles. County of Hennepin.
This survey Intends to sli*)w the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of an ealsilng house.
.Li
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
PHONE:(612)249-4600 FAX:(612)249-4616
ZONING FILE #2520
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: September 22, 1999
TO:Tom Berthiaume
3035 Casco Point Road
Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
COPIES TO:
TYPE OF APPLICATION:Variance
DATE OF MEETING: September 20, 1999 VOTE:6 FOR 0 AGAINST
Planning Commission recommends the following:
Approval as submitted.
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as.
City Council September 27, 1999, meeting starts at 7:00 p.m.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from
the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
X:\APPS\WPWIN60\WPDOCS'vCAROLEW:ACnON‘i520
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commissioners
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
Kris Jenson, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner
September 7,1999
#2520 Tom Berthiaume 3035 Casco Point Road
Variance-Pablic Hearing
Zoning:LR-IC, 1/2 Acre District
Application: To allow a roof overhang to encroach on the sideyard setback.
STAFF SUMMARY
The applicant has requested a variance to permit an extension of the eaves on one side of the
home to extend over a sidewalk alongside the house. The extension would be supported by posts,
and be 30' in length. It would not extend the full length of the house on that side, only long enough
to cover the sidewalk to the side entrance. Currently there is 4 ’ wide rock and plastic area, a 4 ’
sidewalk, and then 2’ of grass to the property line, where a fence is located. The proposed
remodeling would move the sidewalk up against the house and under the extended eaves, and then
using the remainder of the area for landscaping/grass.
The eaves currently on the house are 3 feet deep, and the proposed addition would make the
eaves 5' in depth. The eaves would be supported by 4 posts. The stairs to the side door would be
shifted to be located entirely under the proposed eaves. A diagram submitted by the applicant is
included to show a before & after situation. This site, with the addition, will have a structural
coverage of approximately 12%.
The applicant received a variance in 1993 to permit the construction of a 2-story addition,
as well as an addition to the existing deck. Hardcover approved at that time allowed for 6,293 s.f
(58.27%) in the 75-250’ zone, which is what the applicant is currently at. The proposed additions
and changes will reduce the hardcover to 6,221 s.f. (57.6%).
Pertinent Ordinance
► Section 10.25 One Family Lakeshore Residential District, Subd. 6, Area, Height, Lot Width
and Yard Requirements (B) Lots, Side yard setback shall be 10 feet.
► Section 10.56 Shoreland Management, Subd. 16 Shoreland Overlay District Standards, (L)
Hardcover Limitations (2) Between 75 feet and 250 feet of the OHWL there shall be no
greater than 25% hardcover.
^2320 Tom Berttaume 3035 Casco Point Hoad
I ariance
September 7. J999
page-l
Lot Area and Yards
ANALYSIS
LR-IC
(1/2 acre)
Loi Area Lot Width Lakeside Yard Side Yard Street Yard
Required 21,780 s.f 100'75’10'30’
Proposed 24,130 s.f 80', 73’ at 75’
setback line
75'9.3', 7.1’310’+
Hardcover
Distance
from
Shoreline
Total Area
in Setback
Existing
Hardcover
Allowed
Hardcover
Proposed
Hardcover
Variance Requested
0-75'5,620 s.f 73.6 s.f
(1.3%)
none
(0%)
73.6 s.f
(1.3%)
none
75-250'10,800 s.f 6,293 s.f
(58.27%)
2,700 s.f
(25%)
6,221 s.f
(57.6%)
Permit more hardcover
than allowed (reduced
from existing)
250-500'7,710 s.f 3,039 s.f
(39.4%)
2,313 s.f
(30%)
3,039 s.f
(39.4%)
none
This lot conforms to required lot area, rear, and lakeshore yard requirements.
Issues
1.The applicant received a variance in 1993 for a two-story addition to the home, as well as an
addition to the deck. The approval required the removal of all plastic underlay within
landscaping areas, which the survey indicates was to be done in several areas. The diagram
submitted by the applicant indicates that rock and plastic is located between the existing
sidewalk and the house.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of a sideyard setback variance to permit the additional 2 ’ of roof
overhang to cover a sidewalk as well as to permit 6,221 s.f of hardcover (57.6%) in the 75'-
250' zone.
U2520 Tom Berttaume 3035 Casco Point Road
I’arujnce
SfptembeF 7, 1 999
page--2
Exhibits:
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Application
Location Map
Plat Map
Survey
Hardcover Calculations
Diagrams of proposed area by applicant (2)
Photos of area
Neighboring Property Owners List
.
:
f^2520 Tom Berttaume 3035 Casco Point Road
Variance
September 7, 1999
pagt-5
/Q
Application # ^ SjiP_____
Date Received
Amount Paid ^•2-S'O
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $250.00
($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $150.00
(no change from original application)
Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Site Address ------------------
Property Identification Number fPJ.D.) (1"^ ~~ —ClCi)------------------
Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
Date ProperijcAcquired___________________________________________^(month/year)
I (do) ^ton^)also own the adjacent parcels of land.
Present use of property: resident!^ ___pother (specify).
Zoning District:,3^\Ll
APPLICANT
Name Utn^U
Address: PT f^O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone (home*) Cf /t-
_____ Phone (work^ Co r2^ - ? *9 T
City: Zip:
OWNER (if different than applicant)
Name____________________
Phone (home).
Phone (work)_
‘v.
Address:City:,Zip:,.
:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ y^60
Describe request in detail: Roo/' ^ jJT ^
^iO£r^e^/yr/)c ^A^£r/r^crD
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
VARIANCES REQUIRED .
Lot Area 2_r*Lot Width
Setback:Front
Hardcover
Side __Rear
Lot Coverage
Average Lakeshore
Other (specify)
HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or pre>^^mg
^ m^y #
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
\ Maxwell
\ ORONO =
\ Arm
1 //.
Shudp9oufi Puint
DEFRiNO
ISLAND^ MOO
^ J.u/,___:___;r—irT^ n spRiMctsi'r;"’! \ ^
#^.Uj :3^"Si'r"13J
iUk
/
in^
QS^i
cr:w«-/-
fidV
Sj
I
V•.
• •
V «
H
ORONO
X
lOllW
ffi'narJt Pain SHOREV/OOD
3
WAw^rnKA
ISLAND
OMU
voofi«i 00 v~(«I
A*F
* lOfI
is
2 u s
■
I
\ 7
tfc
CERTinCMTE OF SURVEY FOR
THOMAS B. BERTHIAUME
LtGAl OESCHIPTIOH OF PBEMISES SURVEYED;
dr««n througn • point on tna 0«t# lino os shown on *J'®
RogIstored und Survoy, 80 foot Rorthwostorly
soctlon with tho Southoostorly lino of sold Troct A. k®
shoro of Lako HInnotonka. and thoro torolnatlng, files of
Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin.
This survey Intends to slow the boundaries ®f *‘»®)[®.. descrlbod proptrty, ind tht locitlon of so txisting noiiste
shtd, and other visible hardcover thereon. It does not pur-
port to show any other l■proveRent$ or encroachaents.
0 Iron Marker ^ ^ .Bearings shown are based upon an assueed datuM.
y
> rni-FIN k r.RONBERC, INC.I lim*h Cffiilv Ihji Ihii sur\r\ w*\ prrpimJ in me i»f umkt my JimI
vmon. Jiid Uui I MB a duly ^ * rtlpnrri 4fnl Und Survryuf under
. • •
.• V •HAMJCOVER CALCXJWHCCI-HPRKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCtEONE) MS' 7i-234L-> 250-500'
B 1
500-1000'
V VTSTIMG HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House
Leosth Wddi
X
X
X
B. Garage
C. Dtivewy
VW U p'‘4-
X
X
D. Sidewalk X
X
E. Patio/Deck X
X
F. Landsca^
Uaderlain
By Plastic
Or FAtic
iriVLii tlniiarr>
G. Other
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A _ _IL_ _ _ _ _**■ ® -xlOO
PROPOSED FfrTtTlCQVER IN ZONE
A. House
Leo|<h • Width
X
X
X
B. Garage
C. Driveway X
X
D. SVlewalk X
X
E. PatioTJeeV;X
X
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
Or FAric
X
X
X
G. Other
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A_ _ _ _ _ _ _®-xlQO
j
■S.F.
•
S.F. •
S.F.
S.F.
S.F. •
•
•
S.F.
nji-S.F.••
S.F.
•S.F.
no S.F.
_ -S.F.
SJB.
S.F.
SJ.
0^S.F.
/rOfVl f S.F.
10. ^jCC S.F.
%
IfbN. ?-S.F.
S.F.
-------------------^S.F.
* ^S.F.
•r S.F.
S.F.
•'L S.F.
QS=(:B ■;__S.F.
• • ••
2.10 S.F.
'^uFT'S.F.
S.F.
_ S.F.
S.F.
____S.F
binjc ■.Ir S.F
'i r ' • 1 ;1 i 1 •
1
1
—r 1I
f ! !
•
1
1 ;____
!
• .1 r—1 !
I t _J------C
1
1
1
1
1 ■—]—
1
1 1 i 1 i _i_L_J_J-J___/,./ -v..f .
1
i1
1 -------^-------!
1 i ;1
------
1
J U/Aj
—1 —-1 JIL n t *
\ %'ll \1 1 '
j 1 I J f. i >♦ * •
3\i !
----^
1 1 i
—I
L_J__
u^l
, t
■i*P^ f
1
1
1
t
! .
1—
i j t
1
I t
i
1 " 1f 1 r
11 t
i
—i—:—'
I 1
1
i
!1
' ■ -^
i
1 « .
1 *
. !
i 1 i
1 •
;
1
1
I
1
1
1 1
1
1 1
. 1 1 ) ' ' 1 1 ! 1
1
f t
t 1
1i ' 1 !» i 1
1 i
1 !
■
!
: ! 1
1 ; 1
i 1 i 1 ! :_! ! i 1 1 • •
: 1 * ‘ I ; •
i ' ' i1 1
i
1 ’
1
1 1 i 7 . 1
1
I
---i ^ ----- •
i 1 1
t 1
f I :»i j
T CL\ies
7 :
J 1JTT ! : i i i 1 1 1
_]___:___
\
i
---------’PtI
i i ' ! • 1 1
11 1 '' i • •
1
<
1
1 i : i i »
1
-------!------iW 1’1 :
1 1
U-----U-
* ' i 1
1 rw 1 1 tU-! 1
♦
. -A-----
1 1 i ! • :
t I
! ! *.1 !' Vi !1
1 1 11 ; : 1
' 1
: : V ^ ' 1 1
i 1
i 1 1 1 f . 1 !
1 i
1
i 'ft 'M* ! t i i 1 “1 i 1 j
i
1
■ : 1 1
1
r ,1 t '-i_i !' 1 1
1 1 . ! 1
1 !
'
1 'Vf ! i i i i 1
1
1 i ' ^
1
1 1 T 'tW'T ii i
1 ■• 1
i WH t X-.1 1 ! , V
I
1
:d
t 1 1
1\
H
1
n -«■_LV-
i
1«i : i 1 N 1
I
r
!.—i—'—i^i
« 1
j
1
1 ! j 't 1
1 7H i.
1 >
\
1
i 1 1 i 1 1 1
• ! !
1
1 •
•
1 1 i r
1 ;
} ' *i
!
\
9
1 j 1
1
1»
1
!
t
-----^
/
1
\i
i
i 1
1 i
1
i
Ly_
1 (
; .i 1 1 /
/
1
1
i
1
i
\ !
-----T"
! !
i 11 ■• i i___I—1 —
1
j
•I
!
\
, '1
• ! •
- 4 ' *> ( •
1
t(
1 \-•
/
1 1 i
i
1
•i :n K£
' 1
1•
1 1 I
: i 't • ‘
1
♦
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
f
—1 —r
1 >■ i i T|
----------------J—
i ;1
1
• *
1 1 1 i i i 1 11II t 1
■ ■ -» ......—
1•«
1 rr 1 . '
!
.! ■!_
•
■ !/ 1 u
1
^ \
1 i --------
II 1 1 I>U—i rr^. f 1 1 ; i II t -
' /! 1 i ! v^i
i ■ -
i 1. i ! !>^J
I •'.
i I X--.^
(□Be-
•‘r-’
N
i •> ' )
A-..
. /
'••......V*'
■ ■ /
I
. N
. V
\ s
•
u^.-,w
-^1 r^ :.V' -"JB 1
7 ‘'
\ N
■V » . «r\% M
•
*«/i « . . ^ -*
* • * *
,'ff
f^
I? »\
S ; ■)
r .»
<.4.--
■ \ ^ f ? V <
'V !
«•' ‘••A# • . \
< ;• ;
•..' ,/
••
• * »••
T
f ’ ■< -V v/
A?I
(i^
MM DATE M/ll/fT MENNEfIN COUNTY MOfEETY INFORHATXON SYSTEN
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
REPORT NO. PXASMtl
PACE 2R I “
•ATCH SIC
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NANE/AOOR
PROP AOOR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NANE/ADDR
PROP AOOR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NANE/AOOR
PROP AOOR
OWNER NAHE
TAXPAYER
NANE/AOOR
PROP AOOR
OWNER WANE
TAXPAYER
NANE/AOOR
50 20-117-25 54 0001
05055 CASCO POINT RD
T BERTHIAUHE/C KACHENHEISTER
THOHAS • BERTNXAUNE
5055 CASCO POINT ROAD
WAYZATA NN 55501
58 20-117-25 54 0002
05025 CASCO POINT RD
T R EDIN OJA EDXN
THEODORE 8 JUDITH EDXN
5025 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA NN 55501
58 20-117-25 54 0005
05015 CASCO POINT RD
R 0 LAURIE ETAL
R 0 LAURIE
5015 CASCO PT RO
WAYZATA NN 55501
50 20-117-25 54 0011
05045 CASCO POINT RD
R J JEROEE 8 J P JEROEE
ROBERT D 8 JEANNE JEROEE
5045 CASCO POINT ROAD
WAYZATA NN 55501
50 20-117-25 54 0012
05045 CASCO POINT RO
R A HASTENS 8 B C HASTENS
RICHARD A/BARBARA C HASTENS
5045 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA NN 55501
58 20-117-25 54 0017
05041 CASCO POINT RO
DORIS NOLITOR-WATERS
TOOD WATERS
5041 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA NN 55501
58 20-117-25 54 0010
05055 CASCO POINT RO
JOHN P DENNIS ETAL
JOHN P 8 EVY C DENNIS
5055 CASCO POINT RO
WAYZATA NN 55501
58 20-117-25 54 0024
05005 CASCO POINT RD
JANES R 8 CATHERINE HARTZELL
JANES R 8 CATHERINE HARTZELL
2087 CASCO PT RD
WAYZATA NN 55501
58 20-117-25 54 0025
05020 CASCO POINT RD
E LINOOREN JR 8 B LINOOREN
E LINOOREN JR 8 B LINOOREN
5020 CASCO POINT RD
ORmO NN 55501
58 20-117-25 54 0024
05024 CASCO POINT RO
TRACEY L NORROW
TRACEY L NORROW
5024 CASCO POINT RO
WAYZATA NN 55501
58 20-117-25 45 0055
05040 CASCO POINT RD
J H HOGAN ETAL
JOHN 8 SUSAN N06AN
4452 EHERSON AVE S
NPLS HH 55400
58 20-117-25 45 0052
05050 CASCO POINT RO
K N PORSS 8 A V R0NNIN6EN
A RONNXNOEN 8 K PORSS
5050 CASCO POINT RO
NN 55501
TOTAL BATCH 504 00012
. ^
#2590
-tz
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 2 7 1999
CITY OF
DATE: September Tl, 1999
ITEM NO.
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappa
Title Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Engineer's Report
Item Description: Revised Assessment Roll for Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Project
The original assessment roll for this project was adopted in April 1999, before the bond sale was
completed. An 8.(X)% interest rate was used with the intention to reduce this rate after completion
of the bond sale. The interest rate received on the bonds is 5.001%. This compares to an interest
rate of 4.997%, on the 1997 bonds. An interest rate of 6.25% was used for the 1997 sewer
projects. The 1998 Shoreline/Heritage sewer project was assessed last year at an interest rate of
6.25%. The costs for this project were included in this bond sale. We are recommending that
the 1999 projects in the Orono Orchards and Edgewood Hills areas be assessed at a 6.25%
interest rate.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve resolution revising the Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Project assessment roll
to reflect a 6.25% interest rate.
A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE
INTEREST RATE AND DATE APPLIED TO THE
SHORELINE DRIVE, HERITAGE DRIVE AND
ORONO ORCHARDS AREA SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENT
ROLL, AS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 4262
WHEREAS, the City Council of Orono, Minnesota established the interest rate at
8.00%, and the effective interest date as April 12,1999, on the assessments for the improvement of
sanitary sewer in the Orono Orchards area by passage of Resolution No. 4262; and
WHEREAS, the City Council intends to amend said interest rate based on the 5.00%
interest rate of the bonds sold for the project
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
1. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments e.\tending over a
period of 15 years, the first of the installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in
January 1999, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.25% per annum from October 1,1999.
To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October 1,1999
until December 31,2000. To each subsequent installment when due shall be dded interest
for one year on all unpaid installments.
2. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole assessment on such property, with interest
charged to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days of September 27,1999, and he may,
at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December ? 1 of the year in which such payment
is made. Such payment must be made before November 30 in 1999, or before November 15
in a subsequent year, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding
year.
Page 1 of 2
3 . Partial prepayment is allowed in accordance with Ordinance No. 160, Second Series, adopted
May 12,1997.
4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this asse.«iment to the
County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments
shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting
held September 27,1999.
Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
Page 2 of2
Assessment Roll for ORONO ORCHARD . j
24Sep-99
Municipality: ORONO
Levy Number:
Total Project Assessment: S368,000
Municipal Code: 38
Project Number: 99-1
Levy Description: Orono Orchards Area Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Interest Rate: 6.25% Number of Years Payable: 15
I
PID#Addition
Code
Total Lot
Principal
Block Name Street
n
Property Address Mailing Street Address
Mailing City Address
Units
02-117-23 21 0005 16.000.00 CPAUL* RAF. 11 PFSFK 1235 LYMAN AVE 1235 LYMAN AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 21 0027 16.000.00 IIOWARD&ELIZABETi:
MCMILLAN
1275 LYMAN AVE 1275 LYMAN AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
I
02-117-23 21 0001 16.000.00 MARGARE i' S FOX 1290 LYMAN AVE 1290 LYMAN AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 21 0023 16,000.00 D WllITFLFY&C
MYERS-WHITELEY
60 ORONO ORCl IARD RD S 60 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 21 0032 16,000.00 PETER & AMY
GOSIIGARIAN
100 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 100 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 21 0022 16,000.00 JAMES & MAUDE
WYFFELS
110 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 110 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 21 0033 16,000.00 LOUIS MERCHANT 120 ORONO ORCHARD RDS 120 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 21 0010 16,000.00 JOSEPH ROKKE 180 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 180 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-02 32 0009 16,000.00 REED LARSON 190 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 190 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
PID#Addition
Code
Total Lot
Principal
Block Name Street Property Address Mailing Street Address
Mailing City Address
Units
02-117-23 24 0003 16,000.00 VICTORIA RAICIIE 280 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 280 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 21 0002 16,000.00 THOMAS & JOANNE
HITCH
40 SMITH AVE 40 SMITH AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 22 0008 16,000.00 DAVID & HEIDI HUST 45 SMITH AVE 45 SMITH AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 21 0003 16,000.00 VIOLET GLAMPE 60 SMITH AVE 60 SMITH AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 21 0004 16,000.00 JANET MCMILLAN 80 SMITH AVE 80 SMITH AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 21 0031 16,000.00 JAMES & DIANNE
AHLBERG
95 SMITH AVE 95 SMITH AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
I
02-117-23 21 0026 16,000.00 JAMES & JENNIFER FISK no SMITH AVE no SMITH AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 21 0016 16,000.00 CRAIG HERTZENBERG 115 SMITH AVE 115 SMITH AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
I
02-117-23 21 0017 16,000.00 BRADLEY & PAMELA
HORNER
125 SMITH AVE 125 SMITH AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 21 0028 16,000.00 THOMAS HUNT 140 SMITH AVE 140 SMITH AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
I
02-117-23 21 0019 16,000.00 BETH ANN CAMPBELL 145 SMITH AVE 145 SMITH AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
I
02-117-23 210029 16,000.uO MA ITHEW & MARY
NICOLL
160 SMITH AVE 160 SMITH AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
PID«Addition Total Lot Block Name
Code Principal
street Property Address
U
Mailing Street Address
Mailing City Address
Units
02-117-23 21 0007 16.000.00 JUDY & MICHAEL WCX)D 1230 WOODIIILLAVE I230WOODHILL AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
02-117-23 24 0001 16,000.00 JANE DELANEY 1315 WOODHILLAVE 1315 WOODHILL AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
$368,000.00
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Council meeting
SEP 2 7 1999
CITY OH
DATE: September 27, 1999
ITEM NO.;
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappa
Thie Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Engineer's Report
Item Description: Revised Assessment Roll for Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Project
The original assessment roll for this project was adopted in April 1999, before the bond sale was
completed. An 8.00% interest rate was used with the intention to reduce this rate after completion
of the bond sale. The interest rate received on the bonds is 5.001 %. This compares to an interest
rate of 4.997%, on the 1997 bonds. An interest rate of 6.25% was used for the 1997 sewer
projects. The 1998 Shoreline/Heritage sewer project was assessed last year at an interest rate of
6.25%. The costs for this project were included in this bond sale. We are recommending that the
1999 projects in the Orono Orchards and Edgewood Hills areas be assessed at a 6.25% inC'^rest
rate.
The estimated project assessment in the original assessment roll, approved after the assessment
hearing, was $27,325 per unit. The project has been completed and the revised assessment will
be $27,250 per unit. We are recommending approval of the attached resolution reflecting a 6.25%
interest rate and a $27,250 per unit assessment.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve resolutici ..mg the Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Project assessment roll
to reflect a 6.25% interest rate and a $27,250 per unit assessment.
A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE
INTEREST RATE AND DATE APPLIED TO THE
EDGEWOOD HILLS AREA SANITARY SEWER
ASSESSMENT ROLL, AS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 4301
WHEREAS, the City Council of Orono, Minnesota established the interest rate at
8.00%, and the effective interest date as June 14,1999, on the assessments for the improvement of
sanitary sewer in the Edgewood Hills area by passage of Resolution No. 4301; and
WHEREAS, the City Council intends to amend said interest rate based on the 5.00%
interest rate of the bonds sold for the project
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
1. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a
period of 15 years, the first of the installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in
January 2000, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.25% per annum from October 1, 1999.
To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October 1,1999
until December 31, 2000. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest
for one year on all unpaid installments.
2. The owner of any property so assessed may. at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole assessment on such property, with interest
charged to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days of September 27, 1999, and he may,
at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 3 1 of the year in which such payment
is rfiade. Such payment must be made before November 30 in 1999, or before November 15
in a subsequent year, or interest will be charged through December 3 1 of the next succeeding
year.
3. Partial prepayment is allowed in accordance with Ordinance No. 160, Second Series,
adopted May 12, 1997.
Page 1 of2
4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessment*?
shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting
heM September 27, 1999.
Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
Page 2 of2
Assessment Roll for Edgewood Hills
24-Seo-99
Municipality: ORONO
Levy Number:
Total Project Assessment: $218,000.00
Municipal Code: 38
Project Number: 99*2 EdgewtMKl Hill
Levy Description:
Interest Rate: 6.2S% Number of Years Payable: IS
PID#Addition
Code
Total
Principal
Lot Block Name Street
ft
Property Address Mailing Street Address
Mailing City Address
Units
02-117-23 13 0003 43137 27,250.00 11 mm VARTKES EIIRAMJIAN 1050 EDGEWOOD HILLS
ROAD
1050 EDGEWOOD HILL ROAD
WAYZATA MN 55391
I
02-117-23 13 0005 01373 27,2.50.00 2 1 G J PAUl.UCCI 320 WOODHILL ROAD 320 WOODHILL RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
I
02-117-23 14 0001 43137 27,250.00 n —THOMAS CUSICK 965 EDGEWOOD HILLS
ROAD
965 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 41 0002 43137 27.250.00 c -MARY JEANNE
BOWEN
985 EDGEWOOD HILLS
ROAD
3301 RUM ROW
NAPLES FL 34102
1
02-117-23 41 0003 43137 27,250.00 D mm FREDA KEITH 1045 EDGEWOOD HILLS
ROAD
1045 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD
WAYZATA MN 55391
I
02-117-23 42 0002 43137 27,250.00
E -D E & K K JACKSON III 1055 EDGEWOOD HILLS
ROAD
1055 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 42 0003 ,43137 27,250.00 F m m CECILIA ROSENBERG 450 WOODHILL ROAD 450 WOODHILL ROAD
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
02-117-23 42 0004 43137 27,250.00 G —ANNE LARSEN
SIMONSON
1065 EDGEWOOD HILLS
ROAD
1065 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD
WAYZATA MN 55391
1
218,000.00
t
0
8
•i
STire
COUNCIL MEETING
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ ^
CITY OH Ohoi^v.;
DATE: September 26, 1999
ITEM NO.: /Q
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappa
TUIe Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Engineer's Report
Item Description Award Contract for Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-Sac Project
Bids have been received for this project, and a bid tabulation is attached. Buffalo Bituminous is
the lowest responsible bidder at $121,074.75. Per the Cooperative Agreement, MNDOT will pay
for construction costs plus 8% of the construction cost amount for construction inspection and
engineering services, up to a maximum cost of $132,000. Based on the project bid received the
estimated construction and engineering costs are $130,760.
We are recommending approval of the attached resolution awarding the construction contract to
Buffalo Bituminous for 121,074.75.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve resolution awarding the construction contract for the Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-
Sac project to Buffalo Bituminous Inc., Buffalo Minnesota for $121,074.75
ililF
A RESOLUTION AWARDING
THE CONTRACT FOR THE
STUBBS BAY ROAD CUL-DE-SAC
ORONO/MNDOT COOPERATIVE AGREE>->ENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-
Sac project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law; and
WHEREAS, it appears that Buffalo Butimioous Inc, Buffalo, Minnesota is the lowest
responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
1.The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a construction
contract with Buffalo Butiminous Inc, Buffalo, Minnesota, in the name of the City
of Orono for the construction of the Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-Sac project according
to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in
the office of the City Clerk in the amount of $121,074.75.
2.The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and
the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adcp»ed by the Orono City Council at a regular Council meeting held on September
27,1999.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Page 1 of 1
^ i Bonestroo
Rosene
■ Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
September 22,1999
Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderlik and Associates. IrK. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer
Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. PE. • Joseph C Anderlik. PE. • Marvin L. Sorvala. PE. •
Glenn R. Cook. PE. • Robert G Schunichi. PE • Jerry A. Bourdon. PE •
Robert W Rosene. PE.. Richard E Tbrner. PE. and Susan M. Eberlin. C PA.. Senior Consultants
Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PE. • Keith A. Gordon, PE. • Robert R. Pfefferle, PE. •
Richard W Foster. PE • David O Loskota. PE • Robert C. Russek. AI A. • Mark A. Hanson. PE •
Michael T Rautmann. PE • Ted K Field. PE • Kenneth P. Anderson. PE. • Mark R Rolfs, PE •
Sidney P. Williamson. PE.. LS. • Robert F. Kotsmith • Agnes M. Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE
Offices St. Paul. Rochester. Willmar and St. Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl
Website WWW bonestroo com
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Orono
2750 Kelly Pkwy
PO Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
nf Prono ____
T.H. 12 and Stubbs Bay Road Access Ch.sur(
BRA File No. 139-99-103
Honorable Mayor an ouncil:
Bids were opened for the project stated above on September 21, 1999. Transmitted herewith are ten (10)
copies of the bid tabulation for your information and file. Copies will also be distributed to each bidder.
There were a total of 4 bids. The following summarizes the results.
Contractor Bid Amount
Low Buffalo Bituminous Inc.$121,074.75
#2 Midwest Asphalt Corporation $143,340.13
#3 Northwest Asphalt Inc.$144,431.00
#4 Hardrives Inc.$145,144.46
The low bidder on the project was Buffalo Bituminous Inc. with a base bid of $121,074.75. This
compares to the engineers estimate of $131,000.00. These bids have been reviewed and found in order.
Therefore, we recommend that the project be awarded to Buffalo Bituminous Inc, for the base bid
amount of SI21.074.7S.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. My direct dial phone number is (651) 604-
4863
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Thomas P Kellogg
Enclosures
TPK:lac
11QOC 1 nr ifirfitinncVliiritKWtriMfr
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. MN 55113 • 651-636 4600 • Fax: 651636-1311
^\i Bonestroo
^2 Roscne
nAnderOk&
|\J| Associates
CnfHitcf 14 Afiliitccis
ProjecI Ndine. T H 12 aod Stubbs Bay Road Access Closure
Pfojecl No.;______________________________________
Bid Ooenlno Seotembef 21.1999 at 1:00 pm. C D ST.
File No.:
Owner
139 99.103
thereby certify that this is an exact
reproduction of bids received.
City o( Orono
Thomas P. KeOfigg.
Registration No. 26917
Bidder No. 1
Buffalo Bituminous Inc
Bidder No. 2
Midwest Asphalt
Item
Num Item Units
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
10
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
20
MobUizalion
Cleaflng and orubblno
3 Puvoniont imirKIng ruifuivul • fKimwinunl
Remove pipe culvert
5 Remove sign. Type C
6 Sawing bituminous pavement (full depth)
7 Salvage bituminous pavement
6 Common excavation (P)
0 Topsoil borrow (CV)
10 Ag^gate base, Class 5 mod
Aggregate shouldering. Class 2
Type 41 vveark^g course mixture
’’’ypo 31 base course mixture
Bituminous pavement reclamation
BitumiTKXis material for tack coat
Coarse Filter Aggregate Mod (CV)
Permanent Barricades
Traffic control
4* solid line wliito-epoxy
Sign panels. Type C
Bale check
Silt fence. Typo self supporting
Seeding
Mulch malertal Type 1
Disk anchoring
Commercial fertilizer analysis 22-5-10
Seed Mixture 60A
Colorado Blue Spruce, 6 n. high. B&B
Sugar Maple real. B&B
LS
LS
LF
LF
EA
LF
SY
CY
CY
TN
TN
TN
TN
SY
GAL
CY
LF
LS
LF
SF
EA
LF
ACRE
TN
ACRE
LB
LBS
EA
EA
1000
160
12
130
010
680
150
500
100
820
1100
8310
500
400
8
1
1300
16.25
8
700
4
6
4
1800
180
10
10
Total Base Bid:
Contractor Name and Address
Phono
Fax
Signed By
Title
Bxl Security
Addurvia AckiKiwIcdgod
Unit Price Total
$2,000.00
$1,000.00
$1.50
$5 50
$15.00
$3.50
$2.50
$000
$1750
$12.00
$16.75
$28.50
$26.50
$1.60
$1.00
$27.00
$35 00
$2,500.00
$250
$25.00
$16.50
$1.75
$275.00
$125.00
$110.00
$0.70
$3.60
$250 00
$300.00
$2.000 00
$1.000 00
$1.500 00
$880 00
$180.00
$455 00
$2.27500
$6,120 00
$2.625 00
$6,000.00
$3,18250
$23,370.00
$20.150 00
$13,296.00
$500 00
$10.800 00
$280 00
$2,500.00
$3,250.00
$406.25
$132.00
$1.225 00
$1,100 00
$1.000 00
$440.00
$1.260 00
$648.00
$2.500 00
$3.000 00
$121,074.75
Buffalo Bituminous Inc
2852 County Road 12 N
Buffalo. MN 55313
(612)682 1271
(612) 682 6522
Gregory A. Hicks
Presidont
Bid Bond
1.2.3
Bidder No. 3
Northwest Asphalt Inc
Bidder No. 4
Hardrives Inc
Unit Price Total
$15.000 00
$1.200 00
$0 00
$1000
$27.30
$4 50
$250
$9.70
$1500
$12.00
$1500
$28.50
$26.50
$1.45
$1.75
$20.00
$33 80
$4,500.00
$4.20
$27.30
$70.00
$2.70
$355.00
$190 00
$82.00
$0.35
$550
$430.00
$430 00
$15.000 00
$1.200 00
$600 00
$1.600 00
$327.60
$585.00
$2,275.00
$6.596 00
$2.250 00
$6,400.00
$2,850.00
$23,370.00
$29.150 00
$12,049.50
$875.00
$11,600.00
$27040
$4,500.00
$5,460.00
$443.63
$560 00
$1,890.00
$1,420 00
$1.520 00
$328.00
$630 00
$990.00
$4,300.00
$4,300.00
$143,340.13
Midwest Asprralt Corporation
6350 Industrial Dr
Eden Prairie. MN 55346
(612)937-8033
(612) 937-6910
Neil McLouth
Estimator
Bid BoiKf
1.2.3
Unit Price Total
$9.500 00
$1.500 00
$1.50
$12.00
$1300
$3 50
$3 00
$1500
$1900
$14.00
$22.00
$31.00
$29 00
$1.25
$1.50
$30.00
$35 00
$4,500.00
$4 00
$26.00
$60.00
$250
$400.00
$150.00
$100.00
$0.50
^2.50
$230 00
$250 00
$9,500.00
$1,500 00
$1,500.00
$1,020.00
$156.00
$455 00
$2,730.00
$10,200.00
$2.850 00
$7,000.00
$4,180.00
$25.420 00
$31,000.00
$10,387.50
$750.00
$12.000 00
$280.00
$4,500.00
$5,200.00
$422.50
$480.00
$1,750.00
$1,600.00
$1,200.00
$400.00
$900 00
$450.00
$2,300.00
$2,500.00
$144,431.00
Northwest Asphalt Inc
1451 Stagecoach Rd
SfiaKopce. MN 55370
(G12) 445-1003
(612) 445-1050
Michael B. Pfeiffer
President
Bid Bond
1.2.3
Unit Price Total
$8.660 00
$2.000 00
11.38
$10.00
$1320
$4 00
$2.70
$1600
$1500
$14.60
$20 00
$30.50
$28 50
$1 30
$1.00
$30.00
$33.00
$3,000.00
$250
$25.65
$70.00
$3 00
$750.00
$100.00
$140.00
$0.35
$3.60
$435 00
$435.00
$8.660 00
$2,000.00
$1,380 00
$1,600 00
$158.40
$520 00
$2,457.00
$11,424.00
$2,250.00
$7,300.00
$3.800 00
$25,01000
$31,350.00
$10,803.00
$500.00
$12,000.00
$264.00
$3,000.00
$3,250.00
$420.06
$560.00
$2.100 00
$3,000.00
$800.00
$560.00
$630.00
$648.00
$4,350.00
$4,350.00
$145,144.46
Hardrives Inc
14475 Quiram Dr
Rogers. MN 55374-9461
(612)428-8886
(612)426-8866
OonaldRHal
Vice Presidont
Bid Bond
1.2,3
139D0103bl no 2 BT-1
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 2 1 1999
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: September 27, 1999
ITEM NO.:II
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappa
Title Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Engineer's Report
Item Description: Saga Hill Park Access Road
Plans have been completed for an access road and parking lot to serve the Saga Hill Park. A ten-
vehicle parking lot will be built now with a possible future expansion to twenty cars, shown on
the plans. The amount of grading to complete this construction will be minor and could be
completed by City Public Works staff. The largest cost will be the crushed rock base material.
The City has an annual bid price for this material. The estimated cost for the materials to complete
this work is $7,iIII
We are recommending that a contractor be used for the tree clearing and grubbing as the City does
not have adequate sized equipment to complete this work. We have obtained quotations from two
contractors to complete this work. We have discussed the possibility of moving some of the trees
with both tree contractors. Both contractors think there are not any trees worth moving. The trees
average four to six inches in diameter and are very close together with no branches near the
bottom or canopy. In discussions with Peter Beaker, consultant forester, he also said that closely
spaced wooded trees are not very suitable for moving. One of the contractors grows trees for
transplanting, and they are all widely spaced and groomed for transplanting.
Green Acres Tree Service, Maple Plain $3,000.
Amberwood Tree Service, Mound $3,900.
We are recommending acceptance of the quotation from Green Acres Tree Service.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to accept quotation from Green Acres Tree Service for $3,000 for site clearing.
Motion to authorize construction of the Saga Hill Park access road and parking lot by Orono
Public Works staff with an estimated cost of $7,000 materials.
COUNCIL MEETING
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION SEP 2 7 1999
CITY OF O hui '
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. G:^>pa
Title Director of Public Services
W/ii T ur UHUivu
DATE: September 27. 19W
ITEM NO.: / ^
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Engineer's Report
Item Description: Request for Payment Final, Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation
We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend
approval of Change Order Number 3. This change order for $3,915 is for various small items
tljroughout the project.
We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend
approval of this Request for Final Payment.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve Change Order Number 3 in the amount of $3915.
Motion to approve Request for Final Payment, to Shank Constructors, Brooklyn Park MN in the
amount of $23,770.
w 09/21/99 14:15 0 :06/11- NO:253
Due Sept. IS. 1999City of Orono, 2750 Kelly Parkway, PO Box 66. Crystal Bay, MN SS32 ______________
^i^^^ot^tractor: Shank Constructors. Inc. 3501 85 th Ave N, Brooklyn Park, MN 55445
‘75ISIi^.^**Bond Co. W A Lang, 2100 Lasalle Plaza, 800 Lasallc Ave> Minneapolis, MN 55402
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
NAVARRE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY RENOVATION
FILE 13997
Description of Work
This change order consists of items which were added to the scope of
construction work. These items are described below.
1 The plant backwash waste sump discharges to the sanitary sewer. During start>up
and testing of the filters, it was found that the waste sump discharge capacity is
just sufficient for normal filter operation, but is inadequate to provide significant
protection against building flooding. In order to provide increase flood protection,
three concrete blocks were removed from the bottom course of blocks in the filter
room, a steel lintel was installed, and an 8" x 48" louvered backdiaft damper was
installed, which will normally keep drafts out of the building but would allow water
to escape in the event of a building flood.
The new control system for the water plant monitors approximately 50 functions and
operating parameters for possible malfimctioos. If a critical malfimctiOD is detected, an
automatic alarm dialer contacts City personnel. It is possible that the alarm dialer or
telephone lines could malfimction. Therefore, the alarm system was configured and
wiring was installed to activate the exterior alarm light when a critical malfunction is detected.
The existing chlorine booster pump was new in 199"^ and therefore was not planned to
be replaced. Shortly after plant start-up. the booster pump failed. The water plant
contractor provided labor and materials to mount and plumb the new booster pump.
4 As an added precaution, the control sequence for the filter backwash was modified
to reduce the possibility of filter media loss in the event of a control system malfunction.
5 Minor repairs to an interior block wall were completed.
6 Latch guards for the three exterior doors were not specified but were added for
improved security.
7 Miscellaneous small diameter plumbing additions.
The total negotiated price for these items is $3.91f above the contract price.
K.M39M J9»a09rwVORO\CHNGeOH3 WB2
09/21/99 14:15 l3 :07/11 NO:253
Original Contract Amount
Previous Change Orders
This Change Order
Revised Contract Amount (including this change order)
$636,600.00
$13,138.00
$3,915.00
$653,653.00
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8t ASSOCIATES, INC.
date:
iTy/z. I
Approved by Owner:
cc: Owner
Contractor
Bonding Company
Bonestroo & Assoc.
*. t
K.M 399d09TWVO«D^CHNOCOR3.W52
3
w 09/21/99 14:15 B :02/11 ^0:253
5?**-®**iOwner: City of Orono. 2750 Kelly Pkwv. Orono. MN 33323-0066Bonne
Vn ^For Period: June 4.1 999 to September 3.1 999^^Anooater
Dale: September 13. 199
Reouest No: 9 A Finel
ow«wUA>«iM>wtiConcracior: Shank Consmictore. tnc.. 3301 85th Ave K, Brooklyn Pifk, MN 33443
REt^UEST FOR PAYMENT
NAVARRE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY RENOVATION
BRA FILE NO. 13997
SUMMARY
1 Original Contract Amount
2 Change Order > Addition
Change Order • Deduction
Revised Contract Amount
Value Completed to Date
Material on Hand
Amount Earned
8 Less Retainage 0%
9 Subtotal
10 Less Amount Paid Previously
11 amount due this request for payment no .
3
4
3
6
7
S
S
17.053.00
9 St Final
S.
s
s
s
s
f
s
s
Recommeaded for Approval by:
BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK A ASSOOATES, INC.
Approved by Coatractoi.
SHANK CONSTRUCTORS, INC
Approved by Owner:
CITY OP ORONO
Specified Contract Completion Date:
5-13-99 Date:
K.\'.3QU3S9a7«n\yORC.REQU£wT9.We2
636^600
653.653
653,653
0.00
653,653
0.00
653,653
629,883
23,770
1
09/21/99 14:15 0 :03/11 NO:253
^'0 Itttn
Contract
Unit Qanotlty
Total price for the renovation of the Navarre Water Treatment
Facility, includinj demolition, process c<juipir»nt (by base bid
manufacturers, as described in Part III of this Proposal) plumbing,
HVAC. electrical work, controls and instrumentatien, process
piping, painting, and all other items shown, specified, or
implied to place the facility into lUII operation for
the LUMP SUM of: t-S
Unit Quantity Current
Prke to Date Quantity
Amount
to Date
636.600.00
Breakdown of above:
1 Mobili2ation & Div. I
2 Demo • Lab.
3 Dento - Mat.
4 Concrete Bottom • Lab.
5 Concrete Bottom ♦ Mat.
6 Div. 5 - Ub.
7 Div. 5 • Mat.
8 Div 8 - Lab.
9 Div 8 • Mat.
1 0 Softening Equip • Ext.
1 1 Softening Equip • Int.
12 Filter Equip • Ext.
13 Filter Equip • Int.
14 Piping & Valves
15 Intenor
16 Filtc * Equip • Lab.
17 Filter Equip • Mat.
1 8 Softening Equip • Lab.
19 Softening Equip • Mat.
20 Filter Media* Lab.
21 Filter Media • Mat.
22 Softening Media - Lab.
23 Softening Media • Mat.
24 Chemical Feed • Lab.
25 Chemical Feed • Mat.
26 Pumps • Lab
27 Pumps • Mat
28 Blower ■ Lab.
29 Blower • Mat.
30 Piping & Valves - Lab.
31 Piping A Valves • Mat
37,894 00 100V»37.894
12,944.00 100%12,944
Il.tSO.OO 100%11,850
10,121.00 100%10.121 ,
10.360.00 100%10,360
493.00 100%493
1,173.00 100%1,173
1,190.00 lOOS 1.190.00
4,989.00 100%4,989.00
S.200.00 100%5,200
9,000.00 100%9,000
13,300.00 100%13,500
31.000.00 100%31,000
100%13,600
6.600.00 100%15%6,600
13,692.00 100%15,692
53,793.00 100%53.793
2,352.00 100%2,352
17,038.00 1005^17,038
4,20)0.00 lOOSi 4,200
28,373.00 100*/«28.375
S63.00 too*/.563
18,954.00 1005i 18,554
7J52.00 1005^7,352
8,393.00 100%8.393
7.500.00 100%7.500
16,827.00 100%16,827
3,987.00 100%5.987
6.757.00 10C%6.757
26,922.00 I0C7.26.922
87,181.00 IOCS 87,181
K.\139M3»9«09AWORD«eQUlST*.W92
•
09/21 /99 14:15 g :04/11 ^JO:
32 Hvac 16400.00 100%16,200
33 Electrical 134.000.00 100%3%134.000
34 Steel :400.uo 100%42%1.200
35 Welding 5400.00 100%14%5,500
36 Grinding 2400.00 100%8%2,300
37 Paint Ceiling (change order no. 1)S,300.00 100%10%S.S00
38 Consolidation Grouting (change order no. 2)7,638.00 100%7,638
39 Items added to scope of construction work (change order no. 3)
TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE
3,915.00 100%100%3.915
653,683
I
I*
ft\1»^139StOa7\WORDM«£QUlST» W«2
PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS
Owner ^ CITY OF ORONO
Projtct Noe
File No.
Cootroclor SHANK CONSTRUCTORS. INC
CHANCE ORDERS
DcKrtpdoo
PAYMENT SUMMARY
Matciiil on Hand 0.00
K;\139U 3»»«09TWO«^O'R^ Qyt#T0 WB2
09/21/99 14:15 0 :05/11 NO:253
Amount
1 03/04/99Refer to Change Order No. 1 5.500.00
2 04/07/99 Refer to Change Order No 2 7.638.00
3 09/13/99Refer to Change Order No. 3 3.915.00
Total Change Orders S17.05300
• ^ wv
1 Start 10/31/98 79.313 4.174 58.969
2 10/31/98 12/01/98 19.149 5.182 103.644
3 11'0W98 01/05/99 86.430 9.731 146.770
4 01/05/99 01/28/99 165,139 18,423 368.453
5 01/28'99 03/05/99 59.759 21.568 431J57
6 03/05'99 04/02/99 135.657 28.708 574.154
.7 04/01'99 04/30/99
56.244 31.668 633.358
8 0430-99 06.04/99 28.193 12.855 642.738
9 06/04-99 09/03/99 23.770 0.00 653.653
$653,653 Orifftral Contract $636,600.00
Retainase. Payment No. 9&nnil 0.00 Change Orders 17.053.00
Total Amount Earned $653,653 Revised Contract $653,653.00
••• I
» 4
■ f
.1
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 2 7 1999
CITY OF ORONO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: September 24,1999
Item No.: / 3
Department Approval:Administrator Approval:
Name: Michael P. Gaflron
Title: Senior Planning Coordinator
Agenda Section:
City Administrator's Report
Item Description: Fee Schedule Amendment - Ordinance:
Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation Connection Charge
Attached is an Ordinance to amend the 1999 Fee Schedule by establishing a $350.00 Navarre Water
Treatment Plant Rehabilitation connection charge for properties which were not assessed for that
project or which were not fully assessed for the number of units being connected. This is equivalent
to the $350.00 special assessment placed on those properties with existing structures. The
connection charge would be collected at the time of building permit or connection permit issuance.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to adopt the attached Ordinance amending the 1999 Fee Schedule.
Proposed Motion: Moved by__, seconded by__, to adopt Ordinance Number_, Second
Series to establish a 1999 Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation connection charge.
ORDINANCE NUMBER__, SECOND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 181, SECOND SERIES ADOPTED
DECEMBER 14, 1998 AND ENTITLED ”AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1999 FEE
SCHEDU1.E.”
The City Council of Orono ordains:
Ordinance Number 181, Second Series adopted December 14,1998 and entitled "An
Ordinance Adopting the 1999 Fee Schedule" is amended by adding the fell wing language to the
section entitled "Water Projects" to read as follows:
1999 Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation Connection Charge
All properties within the Navarre Municipal Water District (the area served with municipal
water service via the Navarre Water Treatment Plant) which were either not assessed or
not fully assessed via special assessment 9ar the 1999 Navarre Water Treatment Plant
Rehabilitation Project shall pay a connection charge of $350,00 per unit upon connection to
the municipal water system. Such charge shall be collected at the time a building permit is
issued for new construction, or at the time a connection permit is issued for existing
structures.
This ordinance amendment shall be published in the Laker and Pioneer newspapers
and shall be effective upon publication.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota on this 27th day of
September, 1999.
Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee. City Clerk
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 2 1 1999
cityofohomu
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: September 23,1999
Item No: /^
Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:
Name:
Title:
Gary Cheswick^;,^^^^.
Chief of Police
Agenda Section:
Item Description: Hiring of Part-Time Community Service Officer
Exhibits:None
DISCUSSION
With tl'^ resignation of Jason Koczur, a replacement for the part-time Community
Service Officer was needed. Applications were received with sever^ people interviewed.
Candidate Chris Jensen, a local resident, was selected and has a desire to work as a Community
Service Officer for the City of Orono.
COUNCn. ACTION REQUESTED
Request Chris Jensen be hi. ^d as a part-time Community Service Officer at the pay rate
of $10.00 per hour with no benefits or PERA membership based on the $5100 maximum
earnings stipulation, effective 9/27/99.
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 2 7 W99
CITY OF OHOimO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: September 24,1999
Item No: / ^
Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Name:
Title:
Gary Cheswick
Chief of Police
Item Description: In-Car Video Cameras
Exhibits:None
DISCUSSION
On September 13,1999, Council approved expenditures from the general fund to match
the cost of private donations for purchase of two additional video cameras to be placed in squad
cars.
The console cameras with "in-car" mike kits along with shipping, handling and tax, cost
$9,990.00 total if we purchase prior to October 5, 1999. This is a savings of $100 per camera
from the original price.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
I request an amendment to the police budget to reflect expenditure and permission to
purchase two (2) '<ustom Signal HVTL console in-car cameras for a cost of $9,990.00.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
COUNaL MEETING
SEP '11 1999
CJTY OF OflONO
DATE: September 23,1999
hITEM NO:
Department Approval:
Name Lin Vee
THIe City Clerk
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Licenses
Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval
HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE
1.Kezar Photography
(Photography)
Mitch Kezar
3050 Sixth Avenue North
Long Lake MN 55356
2.Russell A. Norum
(Law Office)
Russell A. Norum
3264 North Shore Drive
Wayzata,MN 55391
3.Small Parts Manufacturing, Inc.
(Machine Shop)
Charles O. Anderson
1295 Loma Linda Avenue
Orono, MN 55364
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses.
. ..i jT y -iD
APPLICATION FOR ANNUAL HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE
CITY OF ORONO
2750 KELLEY PARKWAY, P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
S * J’0 I 3 \m
O.I ( Or OnGi‘,0
NAME: fhjctCln______ b6Ajk:0ZAfc.'fh&a
ADDRESS:
BUSINESS NAME:
S335^
)gS>
Number of Employees Within Operation: f (Provide names of employees on ba^l^ application)
Check One: Initial Review Fee $50.00____Annual Review Fee $30.00
License may be revoked if any violation occurs. City staff shall have five (5) business days in which to
investigate and make a recommendation pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.02 & 5.03. If a site
inspection is required by City staff, the review time will be extended to ten (10) business days. The license
application with staff recommendation will be scheduled before the CouncU at the next regularly scheduled
meeting held on the second and fourth Monday of each month.
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON HOME OCCUPATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 4 (C)
Prohibited Home Occupation Practices
1 . It is unlawful for any business operating as a home occupation to engage in operation without
proper licenses.
2. All persons engaged in the business must reside in the dwelling.
3. No commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in the residentii
nil pwiauua Wll5a5VV* ill —-------------------
No commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in the residential zone.
No excessive stock in trade may be stored on the premises.
5. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed.
6. Entrance to the home occupation must be gained from within the structure.
The undersigned hereby agr&
additional conditions the Cir^
Signature of Applicant:
FOR CITY USE ONLY
the conditions qupted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any
y require.
Date:
[Y USE ONLY; AftcLife^ftw of application, staff recommends the following:
Approval of applL^tion'V _______Deiual of application
Signature of Zoning Official
Signature of Building Official;
Application Date;_______
Date:_ll^Vlll
Date:_5Li#ili51
U
Date License Approved:Date License Expired:
USTING OF EMPLOYEES:
NAME: C.J)Ob .NAME:
ADDRESS: 'YSSO ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:mss^/u CTTY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:DATE OF BIRTH:
•
NAME:
•
•
NAME:
ADDRESS:ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:CITY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:DATE OF BIRTH:
• *
NAME:NAME:
ADDRESS:ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:•cmr&ziP:
DATE OF BIRTH:DATE OF BIRTH:•
NAME:NAME:
ADDRESS:•ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:CTTY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:DATE OF BIRTH:.
1
APPLICATION FOR ANNUAL HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE
CITY OF ORONO ^ 1999
2750 KELLEY PARKWAY, P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 Cl»'
NAME:4. ^aruit\PHONE:
ADDRESS: AJ Slin^ br-_____h ^ L
street
BUSINESS NAME:^\Ai<Cf Arar\At^
city/state
TYPE OF BUSINESS TO BE OPERATED:
Number of Employ jes Within Operation:^
Check One: Initial Review Fee $50.00 _
L aXjlj gfWcC
(Provide names of employees on back of application)
Annual Review Fee $30.00
License may be revoked if any violation occurs. City staff shall have five (5) business days in which to
investigate and make a recommendation pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.02 & 5.03. If a site
inspection is required by City staff, the review time will be extended to ten (10) business days. The license
application with staff recommendation will be scheduled before the Council at the next regularly scheduled
meeting held on the second and fourth Monday of each month.
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON HOME OCCUPATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 4 (C)
Prohibited Home Occupation Practices
1. It is unlawful for any business operating as a home occupation to engage in operation without
proper licenses.
2. .Ml persons engaged in the business must reside in the dwelling.
3. No commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in the residential zone.
4. No excessive stock in trade may be stored on the premises.
5. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed.
6. Entrance to the home occupation must be gained from within the structure.
Tne undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any
additional conditions the City may require.
S ignature of Appl icant :Date:
FOR CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends the following:
yC. Approval of application _________Denial of application
______Date: __Signature of Zoning Official:
Signature of Building Official:
Application Date:
/
Jbk
Date License Approved:Date License Expired:
USTING OF EMPLOYEES:
NAME:'~1^&^i<2 '^triLcTC^ NAME: \ L yUiAjCflX
ADDRESS:^(^y '^J. ADDRESs To iAgflTr? ^ (X^
CITY & zipIU:( (J IkY^ll. ciTY&zip]W^/i?VIh / Vi
DATE OF BIRTH: ^. . . DATE OF BIRTO
NAME:NAME:
ADDRESS:ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:CITY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:NAME:
ADDRESS ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:CITY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:DATE OF BIRTH:
APPLICATION FOR ANNUAL HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE oo
■ .*»
• j
CITY OF ORONO
2750 KELLEY PARKWAY, P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
city Or
1999
'’C
NAME:______________ PHONE:
ADDRESS: ^ t?yLcvU>. ____________r^2£l^
street city/state zip
BUSINESS NAME: //, _____________________________
TYPE OF BUSINESS TO BE OPERATED: ^^Ao
Number of Employees Within Operation: / (Provide names of employees on back of application)
Check One: Initial Review Fee $50.00___ Annual Review Fee $30.00 _
License may be revoked if any violation occurs. City staff shall have fiv. (5) business days in which to
investigate and make a recommendation pursuant to Orono Municipal Coi-i Section 5.02 & 5.03. If a site
inspection is required by City staff, the review time will be extendi to ten (10) business days. The license
application with staff recommendation will be scheduled before the Council at the next regularly scheduled
meeting held on the second and fourth Monday of each month.
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON HOME OCCUPATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 4 (C)
Prohibited Home Occupation Practices
1. It is unlawful for any business operating as a home occupation to engage in operation without
proper licenses.
2. All persons engaged in the business must reside in the dwelling.
3. No commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in the residential zone.
4. No excessive stock in trade may be stored on the premises.
5. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed.
6. Entrance to the home occupation must be gained from within the structure.
The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any
additional conditions the Ciw may require.
SignattireofApplicantiC^ ^ ___________Date:_ illa
FOR CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends the following:
____pc^ Approval of application _________Denial of application
Signature of Zoning Official: ^^Date: ^Signature of Building Official:
Application Date:________^Date License Approved:________Date License Expired:
LISTING OF EMPLOYEES:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP: /P/iOajO, /'
DATE OF BIRTH: ^
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
21 Sep 1999
Tue 10:38 AH
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046558
046558 JOHNSON* MARY ANN
Totals Check Number 046558
Check Number 046559
046559 BERRY. HEIDI N.
Totals Check Number 046559
Check Number 046560
046560 HASEMAN* CAROLE A.
Totals Check Number 046560
Check Number 046561
046561 MOORSE* RONALD J.
Totals Check Number 046561
Check Number 046562
046562 VZZ* LINDA S.
Totals Check Number 04C562
Checic Number 046563
046563 KUEHN. THOMAS M.
Totals Check Number 046563
Check Number 046564
046564 OLSON. RONALD J.
Totals Check Number 046564
Check Number 046565
046565 PETTIT* SANDRA K.
Totals Check Number 046565
Check Humber 046566
Check
Date
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
Page 1
Check
Amount
599.22
599.22
658.82
658.82
680.95
680.95
1*591.00
1*591.08
1*073.72
1*073.72
1*019.22
1*019.22
28.53
28.53
784.65
784.65
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 2 7 1999
CliYUHOHONO
4
I
21 Sep 1999
Tue 10:38 AM
Check
Number Emnloyee Name
Check Number 046566
046566 ANDERSON* BRUCE L.
Totals Check Number 046566
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 2
Check
Date
22-Sep-95
Check
Amount
323.07
323.07
Check Number 046567
046567 BOBZIEN* SUE A.
Totals Check Number 046567
22-Sep-99 657.24
657.24
Check Number 046568
046568 BORIS* SCOTT W.
Totals Check Number 046568
22-Sep-99 1*121.46
1*121.46
Check Number 046569
046569 CARLSON* MICHAEL B.
Totals Check Number 046569
22-Sep-99 444.58
444.58
Check Number 046570
046570 CHESWICK* GARY B.22-Sep-99 1*519.16
Totals Check Number 046570 1*519.16
Check Number 046571
046571 CORNICK* JAMES L.22-Sep-99 1*751.48
Totals Check Number 046571 1*751.48
Check Number 046572
046572 DEMBOUSKI* JAY C.22-Sep-99 1*265.65
Totals Check Number 046572 1*265.65
Check Number 046573
046573 ERICKSON* KURT R 22-Sep-99 1*275.96
Totals Check Number 046573 1*275.96
Check Number 046574
046574 FARNIOK* CORREY L 22-Sep-99 1*382.67
21 Sep 1999
Tue 10:38 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046574
Totals Check Number 046574
Check Number 046575
046575 PISCHENICH. DAN T.
Totals Check Number 046575
Check Number 046576
046576 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K.
Totals Check Number 046576
Check Number 046577
046577 JOHNSON, JEFFREY
Totals Check Number 046577
Check Number 046578
046578 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P.
Totals Check Number 046578
Check Number 046579
046579 MADSON, ADRIENNE M.
Totals Check Number 046579
Check Number 046580
046580 MCNALLY, STEVEN A.
Totals Check Number 046580
Check Number 046581
046581 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L.
Totals Check Number 046581
Check Number 046582
046582 MOROWCZYNSRl, JAMES
Check
Date
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
Page 3
Check
Amount
1,382.67
1,151.21
1,151.21
1,012.78
1,012.78
455.88
455.88
1,212.26
1,212.26
486.33
486.33
1,058.50
1,058.50
591.78
591.78
1,594.34
21 Sep 1999
Tue 10:38 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046582
Totals Check Number 046582
Check Number 046583
046S83 PERSELL, WILLIAM R.
Totals Check Number 046583
Check Number 046584
046584 SCHOENHOFP, JOHN B.
Totals Check Number 046584
Check Number 046585
046585 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F.
Totals Check Number 046585
Check Number 046586
046586 TOMCZYK, MARK W.
Totals Check Number 046586
Check Number 046587
046587 WITTKE, ANTHONY A.
lotals Check Number 046587
Check Number 046588
046588 HOECHST, ROBYN A.
Totals Check Number 046588
Check Number 046589
046589 KOCZUR, JASON R.
Totals Check Number 046589
Check Number 046590
046590 BOTTENBERG, WENDY C.
Totals Check Number 046590
Check
Date
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
Page 4
Check
Amount
1,594.34
373.75
373.75
1,292.41
1,292.41
449.64
449.64
1.284.62
1.294.62
595.99
595.98
572.24
572.24
280.07
280.07
747.36
747.36
21 Sep 1999
Tue 10:38 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046590
Check Number 046591
046591 DAVIS, MARK L.
Totals Check Number 046591
Check Number 046592
046592 GAFFRON, MICHAEL P.
Totals Check Number 046592
Check Number 046593
046593 GAPPA, GREGORY A.
Totals Check Number 046593
Check Number 046594
046594 JENSON, KRISTINE K.
Totals Check Number 046594
Check Number 046595
046595 MEYER, WILLIAM C.
Totals Check Number 046595
Check Number 046596
046596 OMAN, LYLE E.
Totals Check Number 046596
Check Number 046597
046597 PENCE, CHRISTOPHER M.
Totals Check Number 046597
Check Number 04659B
046598 WEINBERGER, PAUL E.
Totals Check Number 046598
Check
Date
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
Page 5
Check
Amount
1,030.60
1,030.60
1,170.62
1,170.62
1,575.69
1,575.69
513.47
513.47
1,110.22
1,110.22
349.38
349.38
842.71
842.71
1,065.26
1,065.26
21 Sep 1999
Tue 10:38 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046599
046599 BRINKHAUS, JOHN F.
Totals Check Number 046599
Check Number 046600
046600 DEBAERE, DONALD L.
Totals Check Number 046600
Check Number 046601
046601 GREGORY, JAMES D.
Totals Check Number 046601
Check Number 046602
046602 HANSEN, STEVEN C.
Totals Check Number 046602
Check Number 046603
046603 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G.
Totals Check Number 046603
Check Number 046604
046604 OBRIFN, RANDY L.
Totals Check Number 046604
Check Number 046605
Q46605 PALMER, GREGORY A.
Totals Check Number 046605
Check Number 046606
046606 RATHBUN, BARRY J.
Totals Check Number 046606
Check Number 046607
046607 SKREEN, DALE S
Check
Date
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Scp-99
Page 6
Check
Amount
1,123.02
1,123.02
887.35
887.35
591.57
591.57
516.49
516.49
620.63
620.63
225.99
225.99
712.24
712.24
1,056.81
1,056.81
802.96
1
21 Sep 1999
Tue 10s38 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 048607
Totals Check Number 046607
ChecK Number 046608
046608 ABRAHAMSON. FRED W.
Totals Check Number 046608
Check Number 046609
046609 BLAIR, JANIS A.
Totals Check Number 046609
Check Number 046610
046610 DOCKEN, THOMAS W.
Totals Check Number 046610
Check Number 046611
046611 JOHNSON, JOSHUA E.
Totals Check Number 046611
Check Number 046612
046612 MCINTYRE, WILLIAM E
Totals Check Number 046612
Check Number 046613
046613 OAS, DANIEL 0.
Totals Check Number 046613
Check Number 046614
046614 PETERSON, JACK W.
Totals Check Number 046614
Check Number 04661S
046615 RAICHE, VICTORIA H.
Check
Date
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22>Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
Page 7
Check
Amount
802.96
187.96
187.96
135.32
135.32
489.28
489.28
141.36
141.36
161.73
161.73
43.84
43.84
199.01
199.01
115.90
21 Sep 1999
Tue 10:38 AM
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046615
Totals Check Number 046615
Check Number 046616
046616 ROSS, JOHN A.
Totals Check Number 046616
Check Number 046617
046617 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD E.
Totals Check Number 046617
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 8
Check
Date
Check
Amount
115.90
22-Sep-99 158.59
158.59
22-Sep-99
Grand Total
1,097.20
1,097.20
46,261.81
21 Sep 1999
Tue 11:22 AM
Check
Number
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
Transaction
Amount
Page 1
Comments
Check Number
59804
59804 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
22-Sep-99 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
Totals Check Number 59804 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
6,589.00
6,589.00
SAVINGS W/H k TRANSFERRED
Check Number
59805
59805
59805
59805 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
59805 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
3,680.47
3,680.47
8,311.51
15,672.45
PICA k MEDICARE W/H
FICA,MEDCR CITY SHARE
FEDERAL WITHHOLDING
Check Number
59806
59806 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
22-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
59006 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
Check Number
59807
59807 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
22-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
59807 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
Check Number
59808
59808 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT
22-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT
59800 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT
Check Number
59816
59016 MN DEPT OF REVENUE
22-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
59816 MN DEPT OF REVENUE
Check Number
59017
59017
59817
59817 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST
ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST
ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST
59817 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST
Check Number
59818
59018 PEBSCO/OBRA
22-Sep-99 PEBSCO/OBRA
275.00
275.00
462.00
462.00
179.51
179.51
3,236.59
3,236.59
931.68
703.00
327.00
1,961.68
184.04
DEFERRED COMP W/H
UNION DUES WH
SKRFJ2f 80010755723
STATE TAX W/H
DEFCOMP-98995-01
DEF COMP
DEF COMP
D180
OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H
21 S9P 1999
Tue 11:22 AM
Check
Humber
Cheek Register
City of Orono
Date Name
Check Humber 59818 PEBSCO/OBRA
Totals Check Number 59818 PEBSCO/OBRA
Check Number 59819 PBBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS
59819 22-Sep-99 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS
Totals Check Number 59819 PEBSCO/US CONF OP MAYORS
Check Number 59820 PERA
59820
59820
22-Sep-99
22-Sep-99
PERA
PERA
Totals Check Number 59820 PERA
Check Number 59821 UNITED HAY
59821 22-Sep-99 UNITED WAY
Totals Check Number 59821 UNITED NAY
Transaction
Amount
184.04
2,221.70
2,221.70
4,104.39
5,334.24
9,438.83
31.00
31.00
Page 2
Comments
USCM DEFERRED COMP W/H
PERA EMPLOYEE W/H
PERA CITY SHARE
CHARITY DONATIONS W/H
23 Sep 1999
Thu 3:24 PM
Check Regiscer
City of Orono
Page 1
Check Transaction
Number Date Name Amount Comments
Check Nur.ter 59024 APACHE GROUP
59824 27-Sep-99 APACHE GROUP 466.47 C-FOLD TOWELS
Totals Check Number 59624 APACHE GROUP 466.47
Check Number 59825 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF
59825 27-Sep-99 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 50.76 HAMB,H0TDOGS
Totals Check Number 59825 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 50.76
Check Number 59826 BIFFS INC.
59826 27-Sep-99 BIFFS INC.133.52 HACKBERY PARK
59826 27-Sep-99 BIFFS INC.133.52 SUMMIT BEACH
59826 27-Sep-99 BIFFS INC.133.52 BIDERWOOD
59826 27-Sep-99 BIFFS INC.66.76 GOLF COURSE
Totals Check Number 59826 BIFFS INC.467.32
Check Number 59827 BOBZIENe SUE
59827 27-Sep-99 BOBZIEN, SUE 36.00 UNIFORM PANTS
Totals Check Number 59827 BOBZIEN, SUE 36.00
Check Number 59829 BONESTROO ROSENE li ASSOC.
59829 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.50.00 JULY COUNCIL MTGS
59829 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSE.NE k ASSOC.147.00 BELLSOUTH ANTENNA
59829 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.395.75 DICKEY PARK/PARKING LOT
59829 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.440.32 ENG/JULY APPLICATIONS
59829 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO
ROSENE k ASSOC.2,356.25 POTENTIAL EXPANSION SITE
59829 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.702.18 NAV WTR PLANT REHAB 7/99
59829 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.5,990.77 EDGEHOOD HOLLS SWR 7/99
59829 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,629.17 EDGEMOOD HILLS RFPIl
59829 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.128.42 HERITAGE DR SWR RFPI4
59829 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.8,831.34 ORONO ORCHARD SNR 7/99
S9B29 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.2,434.23 ORONO ORCHARD SHR RFPIl
59829 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENS k ASSOC.624.75 LSI13 REHAB JULY 99
59829 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.446.26 I/I CASCO FERNDALE AREA
59029 27-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.650.56 TH12/STUBBS BAY RD CLOSUR
Totals Check Number 59029 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.24,643.00
Check Number 59030 BUDGET PRINTING
59830 27-Sep-99 BUDGET PRINTING 16.72 CONSOLID,.TION MTG 9/9/99
23 Sep 1999
Thu 3:24 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 2
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number 59830 BUDGET PRINTING
Totals Check Number 59830 BUDGET PRINTING
Check Number 59831 CARGILL SALT
59831 27-Sep-99 CARGILL SALT
Totals Check Number 59831 CARGILL SALT
Cneck Number 59832 CATCO PARTS & SERVICE
59832
59832
59832
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
CATCO PARTS & SERVICE
CATCO PARTS k SERVICE
CATCO PARTS k SERVICE
Totals Check Number 59832 CATCO PARTS k SERVICE
Check Number 59833 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
Check Number 59834 CITYVIEW PLUMBING k HEATING
59834 27-Sep-99 CITYVIEW PLUMBING k HEATING
Totals Chech Number 59834 CITYVIEW PLUMBING k HEATING
Check Number 59835 CLEAR VIEW
59835 27-Sep-99 CLEAR VIEW
Totals Check Number 59035 CLEAR VIEW
Check Number 59836 COFFEE MILL
59836 27-Sep-99 COFFEE MILL
Transaction
Amount Comments
16.72
1«446.66
1^46.66
BULK SALT
30.61
105.49
99.29
SEAL k GASKET
DRUM-REFLECTOR
SHOP SUPPLIES
235.39
59833 27-Sep-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 62.50 lite bar motor 8186
59833 27-Sep-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 47.76 oil ante bulbs 8185
59833 27-Sep-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 13.50 repair tire 8180
59833 27-Sep-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 199.08 lube,oilafilter 8179
59833 27-Sep-9S CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 193.59 pwr switch,oil chang8178
59833 27-Sep-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 43.75 repair connection 8179
59833 27-Sep-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
110.66 oil change-hub caps 8184
59833 27-Sep-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 50.00 front shock 8101
59833 27-Sep-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 56.95 mount abalance 8182
59833 27-Sep-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 90.09 oil changabalance 8103
59833 27-Sep-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 46.64 add oil k tire repair8167
59833 27-Sep-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 44.95 align front end 8184
Totals Check Number 59833 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
959.47
125.56
125.56
RESTROOM REPAIRS
1,011.75 WINDOW CLEANING
1,011.75
152.00 SUPPLIES
23 Sep 1999
Thu 3:24 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number 59036 COFFEE MILL
Totals Check Number 59836 coffee mill
Check Number 59037 CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA GRP
59837 27-Sep-99 CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA GRP
locals Check Number 59037 CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA GRP
Check Number 59838 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW k UBAN
59838
59838
59838
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
DAHLGREN SHARDLOW k UBAN
DAHLGREN SHARDLOW k UBAN
DAHLGREN SHARDLOW k UBAN
Totals Check Number 59838 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW k UBAN
Check Number 59039 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
59839 27-Sep-99 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
Totals Check Number 59839 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
Check Number 59040 DCA
59040 27-Sep-99 DCA
Totals Check Number 59840 DCA
Check Number 59841 DCA - WIRE ONLY
59841 27-Sep-99 DCA - WIRE ONLY
Totals Check Number 59041 DCA - WIRE ONLY
Check Number 59842 DEPT OP ADMINISTRATION
59842 27-Sep-99 DEPT OP ADMINISTRATION
Totals Check Number 59842 DEPT OP ADMINISTRATION
Check Number 59843 EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC.
59843 27-Sep-99 EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC
Totals Check Number 59043 EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC
Check Number 59844 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
59844 27-Sep-99 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
Transaction
Amount
152.00
203.00
203.00
22.50
427.50
476.56
926.56
31.00
31.00
60.50
60.50
269.79
269.79
195.10
195.10
276.51
276.51
77.50
Page 3
Comments
STUBB BAY PROJECT
AGREEMENT W/HENN COUNTY
MTKA WOOD PROJECTS23O0
GIS DATABASE DESIGN
RESALE ITEMS
COBRA ADM P/AUG 99
FLEX SPD - WIRE 9/21/99
LONG DIST PHONE
STREET SIGNS
BEER
23 Sep 1999
Thu 3:24 PM
Check
Number Date Name
Check Register
City of Orono
Transaction
Amount
Page 4
Comment-
Check Number 59844 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
Totals Check Number 59844 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 77.50
Check Number 59845 EKLUND TREE RECYCLING
59845 27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
EKLUND TREE RECYCLING
59845 EKLUND TREE RECYCLING
90.00
90.00
BRUSH DISPOSAL FOR 8/99
Check Number 59846 ELMER J. PETERSON CO.
59846 27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
ELMER J. PETERSON CO
59846 ELMER J. PETERSON CO
747.50
747.50
PUMPED 980 FERNDALE
Check Number
59847
59847 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS
59647 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS
Check Number
59848
59848
59646 ESS BROTHERS 6 SONS
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
ESS BROTHERS & SONS
ESS BROTHERS & SONS
59848 ESS BROTHERS k SONS
Check Number
59849
59849 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO. INC.
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO. INC
59849 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO. INC
Check Number
59850
59850 FORTIS BENEFITS
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
FORTIS BENEFITS
59850 FORTIS BENEFITS
Check Number
59852
59652
59652
59852
59652 G & K SERVICES
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
G a K SERVICES
G a K SERVICES
G a K SERVICES
G a K SERVICES
16.29
16.29
1,168.31
1,168.31
2,336.62
127.80
127.80
756.49
756.49
8.52
107.27
14.02
107.27
PRINTS
MANHOLE RINGS
UTILITY SUPPLIES
MATERIALS
DENTAL INS/OCT
UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS
23 Sep 1999 Check Register
Thu 3:24 PM City of Orono
Check Transaction
Number Date Name Amount Comments
Check Number 59852 G k K SERVICES
59852 27-Sep-99 G A K SERVICES 14.02 UNIFORMS
59852 27-Sep-99 G & K SERVICES 8.52 UNIFORMS
59852 27-Sep-99 G 6 K SERVICES 42.01 UNIFORMSfirRUGS
59852 27-Sep-99 G & K SERVICES 42.01 UNIFORMSfirRUGS
59852 27-Sep-99 G k K SERVICES 74.66 UNIFORMSfirRUGS
59852 27-Sep-99 G k K SERVICES 14.02 UNIFORMSfirRUGS
59852 27-Sep-99 G k K SERVICES 86.44 UNIFORMSfirRUGS
59852 27-Sep-99 G fit K SERVICES 55.11 UNIFORMSfirRUGS
59852 27-Sep-99 G k K SERVICES 74.66 UNIFORMSfirRUGS
59852 27-Sep-99 G k K SERVICES 8.52 UNIFORMSfirRUGS
59852 27-Sep-99 G fir K SERVICES 14.02 UNIFORMSfirRUGS
Totals Check Number 59052 G fir K SERVICES 671.07
Check Number 59053 GARY *S DIESEL SERVICE INC.
59853 27-Sep-99 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE INC.117.60 BRAKE ADJUSTER
Totals Check Number 59053 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE INC.117.68
Check Number S985S GENUINE PARTS CO.
59855 27.Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.8.50 VEHICLE PARTS
59855 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.-1.51 AIR FILTER
59^55 27-Sep-P9 GENUINE PARTS CO.9.57 SUPPLIES
59 IS 27-oep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.27.50 SUPPLIES
59855 27 Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.6.38 SUPPLIES
59855 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.10.31 SUPPLIES
59855 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.61.77 SUPPLIES
59855 27-Scp-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.16.15 SUPPLIES
59855 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.72.71 SUPPLIES
59855 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.5.68 SUPPLIES
59855 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.20.21 SUPPLIES
59855 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.14.47 SUPPLIES
59855 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.2.00 SUPPLIES
590S5 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.1.20 SUPPLIES
59855 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.13.01 SUPPLIES
59855 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.63.25 SUPPLIES
59655 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.12.66 SUPPLIES
59855 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.4.03 SUPPLIES
59055 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.2.78 SUPPLIES
59655 27-Sep-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.19.84 SUPPLIES
Totals Check Number 59955 GENUINE PARTS CO.370.51
Check Number 59056 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC.
Page 5
59856 27-Sep-99 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 12.69 LOCATES
21 Sep 1999
Thu 3:24 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
59856
Check Register
City o£ Orono
Page 6
Date Name
59856 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC.
27-Sep-99 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC
Totals Check Number 59856 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC.
Check Number 59857 HAGEN, MATTHEW
59857 27-Sep-99 HAGEN. MATTHEW
Totals Check Number 59857 HAGEN. MATTHEW
Check Number 59858 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER
59858 27-Sep-99 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER
Totals Check Number 59858 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER
Check Number 59859 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
59859 27-Sep-99 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
Totals Check Number 59859 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
Check Number 59860 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF
Check Number
59863
59863 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON
27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON
Transaction
Amount
38.06
50.75
17.20
17.20
31.95
31.95
334.54
334.54
Comments
LOCATES
DONUTS CORN DAYS
MATERIAL
CHEMICALS
59860 27-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 170.50 SQUAD CAR RADIO INSTALL
Totals Check Number 59860 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 170.50
sek Number 59661 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.
59861 27-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.664.43 07-117-23-23-0020
59861 27-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.664.43 07-117-23-23-0021
59861 27-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.664.43 07-117-23-23-0022
59861 27-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.664.43 07-117-23-23-0023
59861 27-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.991.62 07-117-23-24-0031
59861 27-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.334.93 07-117-23-24-0033
59861 27-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.334.93 07-117-23-24-0034
59861 27-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.334.93 07-117-23-24-0035
59861 27-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.283.39 07-117-23-22-0008
59861 27-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.283.39 07-117-23-23-0019
59861 27-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.283.39 07-117-23-22-0007
Totals Check Number 59861 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.5,504.30
4,394.10 APPLIC MAY LEGALS
23 Sep 1999 Check Register Pa<
Thu 3:24 PM City of Orono
Check Transaction
Number Date Name Amount Comments
Check Number 59863 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON
59863 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 788.00 GORDON NELSON MATTER
59663 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 691.84 EDGEWOOD HILLS SWR
59663 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 109.00 SAGA HILLS PARK
59663 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 264.00 HOYT RETAINING WALL
59663 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 286.00 BIG ISLAND LOT LINE
59863 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 440.00 TOWN LINE RD/HWy 12
59863 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 55.00 CLEAR CUT TREES/N2492
59863 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 110.00 GORDON NELSON MATTER
59863 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 691.00 STUBBS BAY RD/CULDESAC
59863 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 55.00 FOX RIDGE SWR
598':3 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1.102.16 LEGAL SERVICE F/JULY
59863 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 143.54 DIGITAL MAPPING/HENN CO
59863 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 143.54 DIGITAL MAPPING/HENN CO
59663 27-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 12.26 WOODHILL CC/ROAD MATTER
Totals Check Number 59863 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 9,265.44
Check Number 59864 HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE
59664 27-Sep-99 HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE
Totals Check Number 59864 HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE
Check Number 59865 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY
59865 27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY
59865 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY
Check Number 59866 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS
59866
59866
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS
LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS
Totals Check Number 59866 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS
Check Number 59867 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
59867
59867
59867
59867
59867
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
Totals Check Number S9B67 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
Check Number 59868 MCCOLLISTER k CO
59868 27-Sep-99 MCCOLLISTER k CO
21.92
21.92
30.12
30.12
1.16
13.24
14.40
4.28
24.64
25.69
8.95
16.49
80.05
294.62
RUG EXCHANGE
REGISTER ROLL
BULB
LAMP LITE
1
1* ADAPTOR
SHOP SUPPLIES
1- ADAPTOR
SCREEN
PARTS
GREASE li OIL
23 Sep 1999
Thu 3:24 PM
Check
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 8
Check Number
59871
59071
59871 MIDWEST ASPHALT
27-Scp-99
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
MIDWEST ASPHALT
MIDWEST ASPHALT
59071 MIDWEST ASPHALT
Check Number
59072
59072 MIDWEST TURF SPECIALIST
Transaction
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
MIDWEST TURF SPECIALIST
59072 MIDWEST TURF SPECIALIST
Check Number
59073
59073 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
59873 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
Number Date Name Amount Comments
Check Number 59868 MCCOLLISTER & CO
59860 27-Sep-99 MCCOLLISTER & CO -50.00 CR 55 GAL DRUM
Totals Check Number 59068 MCCOLLISTER & CO 234.62
Check Number 59070 MEDICA CHOICE
59070 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 357.11 HEALTH INS
59870 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 357.11 HEALTH INS
59870 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 2,856.86 HEALTH INS
59870 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 2,424.16 HEALTH INS
59070 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 178.55 HEALTH INS
59870 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 1,249.86 HEALTH INS
59070 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 178.56 HEALTH INS
59870 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 178.55 HEALTH INS
59070 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE -3,759.25 MEDICA HEALTH
59870 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 1,379.57 MEDICA HEALTH
59070 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 7,159.00 MEDICA HEALTH
59070 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 170.55 MEDICA HEALTH
59070 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 357.11 MEDICA HEALTH
59070 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 178.56 MEDICA HEALTH
59070 27-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 603.52 MEDICA HEALTH
Totals Check Number 59870 MEDICA CHOICE 13,077.02
7,343.40
374.93
7,710.33
63.90
63.90
27.00
27.00
ASPHALT
ST MATERIAL
MOWING (03329 CRYSTAL BAY
OXYGEN
Check Number 59074 MORCWCZYNSKI, JIM
59074 27-Sep-99 MOROWCZYNSKI, JIM 63.02
Totals Check Number 59874 MOROWCZYNSKI, JIM 63.02
EXPENSE REPORT
23 Sep 1999
Thu 3:24 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
59075
59075 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE
27-Sep-99 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE
Totals Check Number 59075 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE
Check Number 59076 MTI DIST CO.
59076
59076
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
MTI DIST CO
MTI DIST CO
Totals Check Number 59876 MTI DIST CO
Check Number 59077 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC
59077 27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC
59877 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC
Transaction
Amount
99.00
99.00
0.44
42.20
50.64
115.00
115.00
Page ?
Comments
COFFEE F/RESALE
SPACER
SPACER
MEMBERSHIP/OMAN-10/31/0C
Check Number 59800 NAVARRE HARDWARE
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 5.31 WHT MARK PAINT
59080 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 5.09 KEY
59080 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 34.25 MOTOR OIL
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 31.93 GRAY STAIN
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 7.09 PAINT SUPPLIES
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 13.46 PARTS
59080 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 15.84 HOSE CONNECTORS
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE hardware 3.10 CLEANER
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 66.67 PAINT SUPPLIES
59800 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE hardware 6.37 BATTERIES
59800 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 13.83 LEVEL
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 5.30 GRASS SEED
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 3.18 HOOK
59800 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 34.06 STAIN
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 19.13 SUPPLIES
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 5.35 FITTINGS, k OIL
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 27.74 SHOP SUPPLIES
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 2.71 SHOP SUPPLIES
59080 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 0.36 SHOP SUPPLIES
59080 27.Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 36.19 SHOP SUPPLIES
59080 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 10.95 SHOP SUPPLIES
59800 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 14.94 KEY- SPRAY PAINT
59800 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 1.66 WASHERS-BOLTS
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 3.18 GLOVES
59800 27.Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 8.51 HAND SOAP
59800 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 16.81 BATTERIES
59800 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 0.34 CPLS 3
23 Sep 1999
Thu 3x24 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 10
Check Transaction
Number Date Name Amount Comments
Check Number 59880 NAVARRE HARDWARE
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 9.24 HOSE CLAMPS, & FTGS
59880 27-Sep-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 3.50 SPRAY PAINT
Totals Check Number 59880 NAVARRE HARDWARE 414.17
Check Number 59881 NSP
59881 27-Sep-99 NSP 57.42 LIFT STATION
Totals Check Number 59881 NSP 57.42
Check Number 59884 OFFICE DEPOT
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 8.76 COLORED PAPER
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 7.18 COLORED PAPER
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 67.32 MISC SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 55.09 MISC SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 60.33 MISC SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 144.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 176.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT -82.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT -67.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 36.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 30.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 140.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 115.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES
S9884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT lOt.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 133.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 110.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 117.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 118.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 95.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 146.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 120.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 40.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 10.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 8.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 14.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 12.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT 10.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT -42.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT -34.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES
59884 27-Sep-99 OFFICE DEPOT -55.35 RETURN KEYBOARD TRAY
Totals Check Number 59804 OFFICE DEPOT 1,608.15
Check Number 59885 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.
59885 27-Sep-99 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.12.60 CHIPS
23 Sep 1999
Thu 3:24 PM
Check
Number Date
Check Register
City of Orono
Name
Transaction
Amount Comments
Page 11
Check Number 59085 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.
Totals Check Number 59885 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.12.60
Check Number
59886
59006 OLSON, RON
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
OLSON, RON
59886 OLSON, RON
Check Number
59887
59007 OMAN, LYLE
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
OMAN, LYLE
59807 OMAN, LYLE
Check Number
59888
59008 PERFORMANCE DRIVING INC
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
PERFORMANCE DRIVING INC
59888 PERFORMANCE DRIVING INC
Check Number
59089
59889
59889
59809 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR
PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR
PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR
59889 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR
Check Number
59890
59890
59890
59890
59890 PIONEER
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27.Sep-99
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
Totals Check Number 59890 PIONEER
Check Number
59891
59091 POCKET FULL OF POSIES
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
POCKET FULL OF POSIES
69091 POCKET FULL OF POSIES
39.37
39.37
35.64
35.64
880.00
880.00
64.97
30.89
47.25
143.11
62.92
23.37
25.17
55.73
167.19
293.00
293.00
REIM PATCH CARDS
MILEAGE REIMS
DRIVERS TRAINING
TOW/OLDS
TOW/SQUAD 8170
WELD WHEEL MOUNT
AD FOR BID-WELL81
ADV APP82514
ADV APP82522
LAND USE APPLICATIONS
LANDSCAPE MATERIAL
Check Number
59092
59092 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC.
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC
59992 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC
1,693.35
1,693.35
CLEANING SERVICE
23 Sep 1999
Thu 3:24 PM
Check
Number Date Name
Check Register
City of Orono
Transaction
Amount
Page 12
Comments
Check Number 59892 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC.
Check Number 59093 PRAIRIE OFFSET
59893
59893
59893
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
PRAIRIE OFFSET
PRAIRIE OFFSET
PRAIRIE OFFSET
59893 PRAIRIE OFFSET
260.59
455.36
488.91
1«204.86
4500 WHITE ENVELOPES
INSPECTION FORM&SEPTIC
BUSINESS CARDS
Check Number 59894 REED VENDING
59894 27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
REED VENDING
59094 REED VENDING
32.70 CANDY RESALE
Check Number 59095 RYAN FORD
59895
59895
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
RYAN FORD
RYAN FORD
59895 RYAN FORD
69.12
22.80
91.92
HUB CAPS
EQUIP PARTS
Check Number 59896 STATE OF MINNESOTA
59896 27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
STATE OF MINNESOTA
59096 STATE OF MINNESOTA
20.00
20.00
INSP FEE F/AIR TANKS
Check Number 59097 STREICHERS
59097
59097
59097
59097
59897
59897
59897
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27.SCP-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
STREICHERS
STREICHERS
STREICHERS
STREICHERS
STREICHERS
STREICHERS
STREICHERS
59897 STREICHERS
213.74
127.69
9.85
103.75
50.47
08.89
23.30
625 .
uniform
35MM CAMERAS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
FLASHLITE HOLDRaBELT
STROBE TUBE REPLACEMENT
MOUNT KIT
Check Number 59898 SUBURBAN TIRE INC.
59090 : -Sep-99 SUBURBAN TIRE INC 290.59 TIV.E F/BiiZ PICKUP
Totals Check ; •59890 SUBURBAN TIRE INC 290.59
Check Number 59099 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO
59099 27-Sep-99 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 432.00 TEMP HELP/WK OF 9/12/99
23 Sep 1999
Thu 3:24 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
59899
Date Name
Check Register
City of Crtao
59899 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO
27-Sep-99 TEMPORARIES TO-GO
Totals Check Number 59899 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO
Check Number
Transaction
Amount
526.50
958.50
Page 13
Comments
TEMP HELP/WK OF 9/19/99
59900 THE SIGN AGE
59900 27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
THE SIGN AGE
59900 THE SIGN AGE
Check Number
59901
59901 THORPE DIST CO.
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
THORPE DIST CO,
59901 THORPE DIST CO,
Check Number
59902
59902
59902
59902 TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY
TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY
TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY
59902 TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY
132.24
132.24
48.60
48.60
54.36
5.69
44.12
104.37
TRK8427 SIGNAGE
BEER RESALE
LINER KIT,SLIP NOZZLE
CYLINDER RENTAL
ST CHEMICALS
Check Number 59903 TRI STATE PUMP
59903 27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
TRI STATE PUMP
59903 TRI STATE PUMP
Check Number 59904 TRUE VALUE HARDWARE
1,120.46
1,120.46
MOTOR REPAIRS
59904 27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
TRUE VALUE HARDWARE
59904 TRUE VALUE HARDWARE
19.18
19.18
CART FUSE
Check Number
59905
59905 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO.
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO.
59905 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO.
Check Number
59906
59906 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
27-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
59906 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
97.07
97.07
78.25
78.25
ADJUST GARAGE DOOR
PD/UNIFORM CLOTHES
23 Sep 1999
Thu 3:24 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
59907
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 14
Date Name
59907 UNIV OF MINNESOTA
27-Sep-99 UNIV OF MINNESOTA
Totals Check Number 59907 UNIV OP MINNESOTA
Check Number 59908 WARNING LITES OF MN
59908 27-Sep-99 WARNING LITES OF MN
Totals Check Number 59908 WARNING LITES OF MI4
Check Number 59909 WIDMER INC
59909
59909
27-Sep-99
27-Sep-99
WIDMER INC
WIDMER INC
Totals Check Number 59909 WIDMER INC
Check Number 59910 WILDER RESEARCH CENTER
59910 27-Sep-99 WILDER RESEARCH CENTER
Totals Check Number 59910 WILDER RESEARCH CENTER
Check Number 59911 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE
59911 27-Sep-99 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE
Totals Check Number 59911 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE
Check Number 59912 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES
Transaction
Amount
330.00
330 0
108.95
100.95
384.00
640.00
1,024.00
600.00
600.00
1,300.00
1,300.00
Comments
SEPTIC SEMINARS-PENCE
BARRICADES
MAIN BREAK/NARROWS 2RIDGE
FORCEMAIN/9980 FERNDALS
BOUNDARY ANALYSIS
MOWING FOR AUGUST
59912 27-Sep-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 552.50 INS AGUNT FEF CR
59912 27-Sep-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 907.50 INS AGENT FEE QR
59912 27-Sep-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 80.00 INS AGENT FEE QR
59912 27-Sep-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 182.50 INS AGENT FEB QR
59912 27-Sep-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 77.50 INS AGENT FEE QR
Totals Check Number 59912 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 1,800.00
Grand Total 90,206.98
INFORMATION
ITEMS
^OOf^ciL meeting
SEP 2 1 1999
Cl I y OH OHO/VO
COUNCIL MEETING
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 2 7 I!\9§W%
Crrv OF ORONO
OF
C ouncil meetinq
SEP 2 7 IW9
CITY OH OHOJVu
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16.1999
ROLL
The Orono Planning Commission met cn the above date with the following members present:
Acting Chair Sandra Smith, Commissioners Daniel Kluth, William Stoddard, Dale Lindquist, and
Jay Nygard. Commissioners Elizabeth Hawn and Janice Berg were absent. The following
represented City Staff: Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Kris Jenson, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Jabbour was present.
Acting Chair Smith called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS
(#1) TODD KIMMIS. 2102 SUGARWOOD DRIVE-REVIEW FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION
WITHIN SUGAR WOODS PLAT. 6:31 p.m. - 6:44 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Todd Kimmis, Applicant, was present.
Weinberger stated due to the special review procedure established for requests that do not meet the
covenants and special zoning requirements within Sugar Woods, the Planning Commission
assumes the sole responsibility for the review and final recommendations regarding requests for
special consideration. The Applicant In this case is requesting a driveway ten feet from the side
property line where 30 feet is required. Under this special review procedure, the Applicant does
have the right to appeal the Planni..g Commission decision to the City Council at their next available
meeting.
Weinberger stated the special conditions placed on the development requires that any improvements
that occur on the property must do so within the required building setbacks. Setback requirements
for this lot are front 50 feet, rear 50 feet, and side 30 feet. The proposed driveway is a hardcover
improvement and would be required to meet the 30 foot side yard setback. The Applicant is
proposing to construct a side loaded garage. In an effort to preserve some mature trees that exist
on the property, the property owner has requested the house be built near the front of the property,
thus requiring the garage to be located closer to the side lot line than would be necessary if the
house were built further from the street.
Weinberger remarked that the adjoining property owner has submitted a letter In support of this
application.
City Staff is recommending approval of this application.
Kimmis stated that he is requesting the setback variance in order to construct a side loaded garage
at the proposed location in an effort to save some mature trees that exist on his property.
Chair Smith inquired whether the proposed house and garage are outside of the tree root system.
Kimmis stated that they are staying outside the drip line of the trees, which is assumed as the edge
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16,1999
(Todd Kimmis, Continued)
of the root system. Kimmis commented that he purchased the lot due to the large number of trees
on the property, and in his opinion this is the best location for the house and garage.
There were no public comments.
Lindquist indicated he has no problem with this application.
Nygard indicated he was in agreement with Lindquist.
Stoddard inquired whether any other driveways have needed variances in this development.
Kimmis stated that a majority of the driveways in this development have required variances. Kimmis
remarked that the proposed hardcover is at 13.21 percent.
Weinberger stated only a couple properties in this development have requested special
consideration due to efforts to preserve the trees on their properties. Weinberger stated that the
Applicant is under the hardcover and structural coverage limits for this property.
Kimmis stated due to aesthetic reasons, he is proposing a side loading garage.
Stoddard moved, Kluth seconded, to recomman approval of the Application for Todd
Kimmis, 2102 Sugarwood Drive, to allow a driveway to encroach 20 feet into the required 30
feet side yard setback. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#2) #2511 DOUGLAS WHITELEY, 60 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT, 6:45 p.m. - 6:50 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Douglas Whiteley, Applicant, was present.
Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for an accessory building on
a through lot. They are proposing to remove the existing garage located on the lot and build a new
garage located closer to the center of the lot. A Conditional Use Permit is required for through lots to
ensure the development is consistent with the surrounding properties and that an accessory building
is not located in an area that may obstruct the neighbors' views or in areas considered to be front
yard areas.
Weinberger stated the proposed location of the accessory building does not appear to detract from
adjacent properties and would be located further from Orono Orchard Road. The Applicants are not
proposing to change the access to the property with the new structure.
Whiteley stated his property is very hilly and wooded where the proposed garage will be located, and
they are attempting to preserve as many of the larger mature trees as possible. Whiteley
commented he is proposing to construct a garage which keeps with the character of the house.
Smith inquired whether the Applicant is intending to continue to use the garage attached to the
house.
Whiteley stated the detached two car garage will be used mainly for storage, with the existing garage
Page 2
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16,1999
(#2511 Douglas Whiteley, Continued)
used to store his vehicles.
Kluth noted that the existing garage is proposed to be removed.
Whiteley stated that there is a single car detached garage which will be removed.
Weinberger stated if this was not a through lot, there would be no need for an application.
There were no public comments.
Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2511,60 Orono
Orchard Road South, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the Applicants to construct a
detached garage on a through lot based on the location shown on the site survey submitted
by the Applicant and the existing one-stall garage will be removed upon completion of
the new building. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nay.' 0.
Items 3,4, and 5 follow Item No. 6.
CONTINUED NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS
(#6) #2508 JAMES ERLER, 3448 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE, 6:51 p.m. • 6:59 p.m
James Erler, Applicant, was present.
Jenson stated the Applicant is requesting a variance to the sideyard setback in order to add a
second story to the existing residence 2.4 feet from the side yard property line where 10 feet is
required, resuiting in a variance of 7.6 feet. The addition will not result in any changes to the
building structure and does not require a height variance.
Erler stated this application is a result of some storm damage that the residence suffered.
Kluth inquired whether the location of the house was grandfathered in.
Jenson stated that the residence was constructed approximately 50 years ago.
Weinberger stated the residence was constructed before the City adopted the ordinances
regulating setbacks.
Lindquist commented he does not have a problem with this application in that is is not adding
anything to the existing foundation. Lindquist commented he does have a concern about adding
more structure to a relatively small lot, but that legally there is nothing that prevents the Applicant
from doing so.
There were no public comments.
Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2508,
3448 North Shore Drive, to allow construction of a second story addition to the existing
residence with a sideyard variance of 7.6 feet.
Page 3
I
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16,1999
(#2508 James Erler, Continued)
Smith inquired whether the stipulation should be added that no new hardcover will be allowed on
this property, noting that the property is currently over hardcover limits in the 75-250’ setback and
the 250-500' setback.
Lindquist amended his motion, Stoddard seconded, to include the stipulation that any new
request for additional hardcover on this propeity will not be looked upon favorably by the
Planning Commission. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS
(#3) #2510 DOUGLAS WHITELEY, HEIDI HUST AND DAVID HUST, 600 ORONO ORCHARD
ROAD SOUTH AND 45 SMITH AVENUE • CLASS I SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE
REARRANGEMENT, 7:00 p.m. - 7:09 p.m.
Douglas Whiteley, Heidi Must and David Must, Applicants, were present.
Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement between
the lots that results in two substandard lots. The intent of this lot line rearrangement is to gain an
additional 17 feet of frontage along Orono Orchard Road to allow for an addition of living space to
the home. The lot line rearrangement would involve a land swap of approximately 2,500 square feet
of land from each property to the other. The impact on the rear property width would be minimal,
with each lot only losing 17 feet in width at the rear.
Weinberger stated both properties are part of the Orono Orchard sewer expansion project this
year and that this tot line rearrangement would not substantially change the size of each lot but
would increase the frontage along the front lot line.
City Staff is recommending approval of this application based on the three conditions outlined in
the Planner's report.
Whiteley commented that he would like to continue to reside in his house, noting that his
neighbors are accommodating his desire to add on to the existing building.
The Husts had no comment.
There were no public comments.
Weinberger stated there is a possibility that there are no current draiange and utility easements
on this property, noting that the survey does not indicate any easements. The Applicant is
required to dedicate drainage and utility easements aiung the new property lines and vacate any old
drainage and utility easements along the old property line. The Applicant is also required to provide
to the City proper documentation relating to the easements on both properties.
Lindquist inquired whether there is sufficient room along the new property lines for the easements.
Weinberger stated that there should be sufficient room for the easements.
Smith inquired whether the Applicants were comfortable with the conditions proposed.
Whiteley indicated he will comply with the conditions.
Page 4
I
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16,1999
(#2510 Douglas Whiteley, Cpntinued)
Kluth noted that the lot line rearrangement results in two substandard lots.
Weinberger stated that this area is currently zoned two acres, with both lots currently being
substandard. Weinberger stated the lot line rearrangement will not substantially change the size of
the lot.
Lindquist moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2510,60 Orono
Orchard .oad South and 45 Smith Avenue, for a lot line rearrangement as proposed
subject to the three conditions outlined in the August 16,1999 Planner's Report.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
CONTINUED NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS
(#5) #2506 EDWARD H. HAMM, 485 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH • CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT, 7:10 p.m. - 7:17 p.m.
Edward Hamm, Applicant, was present.
Weinberger stated the City Council had previously approve:? extension of the sanitary sewer to the
principal residence and two existing guest houses on the H.'>mm property. A condition of approval
was to formally permit the two existing guest houses legal by requiring the properly owner to submit
an application to the City for a guest house conditional use permit. The conditional use permit
would allow the continued use of the property as a principal dwelling and two secondary guest
houses. The number of dwellings is limited to three on the properly for the three sewer units that
have been provided on the site.
City Staff is recommending approval of this application based on the fact that the guest houses
meet the minimum principal building setbacks and is subject to the conditions outlined in the
August 10,1999 Planner's Report and the conditions outlined in Resolution No. 4271.
Smith inquired whether the correct address of the residence is 485 Orono Orchard Road South or
940 South Brown Road.
Weinberger stated that the 485 Orono Orchard Road South is the correct address for this residence.
Hamm stated that he is attempting to comply with the conditions required by the City Council.
There were no public comments.
Lindquist inquired if the property is subdivided in the future, whether the guest houses would be
allowed to remain.
Weinberger stated the guest houses in their current locations would need to be removed because
they would not meet the required setbacks If the property is subdivided, the property would need
to meet the building requirements at that time.
Hamm commented that the majority of the 18 acres is composed of wetland.
Lindquist commented that he does not want to see the guest houses grandfathered
Page 5
I I
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16,1999
(#2506 Edward Hamm, Continued)
Kluth inquired when the guest houses were constructed.
Hamm stated they were constructed over 50 years ago.
Stoddard moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2506,
485 Orono Orchard Road South, for a guest house conditional use permit based on the
structure meets the yard requirements established by the Municipal Code for a guest
house conditional use permit subject to City StafTs Recommendations One and Two
contained in the August 10,1999 Planner's Report. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#4) #2512 ALAN RICHIE AND MARILYN RICHIE, 905 TONKAWA ROAD • CLASS III
SUBDIVISION, 7:18 p.m. -7:29 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
David Erotas, Erotas Builders Corporation, was present on behalf of the Applicants.
Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting a three lot subdivision of a 6.3 acre lot. The lot
is currently developed as a single residential site with a tennis court, driveway and paved walk to
the lake. The Applicant has indicated that all existing structures and hardcover will be removed
from the property prior to final plat based on subdivision approval, with a new residence being
constructed on Lot 2 and Lots 1 and 3 being available for purchase.
Weinberger stated that a previous applicant had requested a subdivision for this property
previously but had withdrawn his request prior to City Council approval of the final plat. The time
limit has expired on that previous application.
Weinberger remarked that all lots within the LR-1B zoning district are required to meet a minimum
of one acre dry buildable and 140 feet of width at the lakeshore. Each proposed lot in this
subdivision does exceed the minimum standards for lot width and size and appears to demonstrate
suitable building sites. The surrounding properties are also zoned LR-1B. The proposed
subdivision is consistent with the Tonkawa area, and access is proposed off of Tonkawa Road.
Weinberger stated that the property was assessed for three sanitary sewer units In 1976, and all
assessments have been paid. Sanitary sewer to Lots 1 and 2 should be provided from Tonkawa
Road, with the existing sewer on Tonkawa Road east of Lot 1 being extended to the south
approximately 100 to 200 feet to serve Lot 2. Sewer connection for Lot 3 should be extended over
the southwestern portion of the property.
This property is subject to a bluff impact zone, with the bluff line being depicted on the survey.
The existing topography is very steep extending to the lake, and all structures are required to meet
a 30 feet top of bluff setback. No land alteration or construction is allowed within the bluff impact
zone.
Staff is requesting the standard drainage and utility easements along the property line prior to
final plat.
Weinberger staled the newly created lots will need to meet all the zoning district requirements
for developments in the LR-1B zoning district, and is recommending approval of this application
based on the conditions outlined in the August 9,1999 Planner's Report. The Applicant will
need to submit a grading and erosion plan for the entire site subject to review and approval by the
I
Page 6
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
^^NUTES FOR AUGUST 16,1999
(#2512 Alan Richie, Continued)
City Engineer as well as obtain a permit from Hennepin County Department of Transportation for
the new curb cut and access to Lots 1,2, and 3. The Applicant is further required to submit plans
for e)dension of the sanitary sewer service for review and approval by the City Engineer and Public
Works Director.
Erotas stated they have the understanding that this property was previously approved for a three lot
subdivision before the onginal residence was constructed.
Weinberger stated it was originally subdivided into three lots and then combined into one lot for
tax purposes.
There were no public comments.
Smith inquired whether the applicants have any concerns regarding the conditions outlined in the
Planner's Report.
Erotas stated they are in the process of complying with the conditions.
Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2512,
905 Tonkawa Road, for a three lot lakeshore residential subdivision of a 6.3 acre lot,
with the understanding that the Applicants must comply with all the conditions outlined in
the Augusts, 1999 Planner's Report. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
CONTINUED NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS
(#7) #2509 ANDREW RONNINGEN, 3030 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCE, 7:30 p.m. -
7:56 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Andrew Ronningen, Applicant, was present.
Jenson stated the Applicant is requesting variances to construct a iwo story, 22' by 24* addition
to the existing home. Variances are required to tne average lakeshore setback, as well as
hardcover within the 75-250' zone. The Applicanv h?s proposed to remove 18 patio blocks as part
of this project; however. Staff feels that in there is ? large amount of landscaping with plastic
underlayment that could be removed in order to alk w for the addition and stay under the 25 percent
hardcover allowed. Structural coverage limits will n«.t be exceeded with this addition. With the
reduction of 320 square feet of landscaping, the hard over would be reduced to 24.2 percent.
Ronningen stated they would like to construct Ihe addition onto their house to accommodate their
growing family.
Lindquist stated that the Planning Commission does not count plastic as hardcover anymore, but
that removal of the plastic will be a condition of approval. Lindquist inquired whether removal of the
patio blocks would be sufficient to bring the hardcover under the oercent limit.
Jenson stated removal of the patio blocks would account for approximately 180 square feet, but
would need to remove approximately 320 square feet of hardcover else.^here in order to bring the
hardcover below the 25 percent limit.
Page 7
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16,1999
(#2509 Andrew Ronningen, Continued)
Lindquist inquired whether 320 square feet of hardcover could be removed outside of the plastic
undertayment.
Ronningen commented the driveway is gravel with grass down the middle.
Smith stated that the entire gravel driveway would count as hardcover. Smith inquired if the
plastic undertayment is removed, what the hardcover would be reduced to.
Jenson stated there is approximately 436 square feet of landscaping with plastic undertayment
currently, and the size of the addition is 520 square feet, which would result in a hardcover figure
under 25 percent. Jenson noted that removal of the patio blocks is already calculated into the
hardcover figures.
Stoddard inquired whether the neighbors have expressed any concerns regarding this application.
Jenson stated the property is heavily wooded and would not impact the neighbors’ property.
There were no public comments.
Smith stated in her view the plastic undertayment will need to be removed as a condition of
approval.
Jenson stated if all the plastic undertayment is removed, hardcover would be approximately 24.5
percent. Jenson stated a minimum of 350 square feet of hardcover would need to be removed in
order to meet the 25 percent hardcover limit.
Stoddard moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2509,
3030 Casco Point Road, for a variance to the average lakeshore setback to construct a
two story, 22 ’ by 24' addition to their existing home, subject to the removal of approximately
436 square feet of landscaping/plastic undertayment within the 75-250* zone.
Smith inquired whether this would be another property that should be notified that no new
applications for hardcover will be locked upon favorably by the Planning Commission.
Stoddard stated that with removal of the plastic undertayment and landscaping, the hardcover would
be under the 25 percent limit, so in his view that stipulation is not warranted on this property at this
time. Stoddard commented his motion will remain as originally stated.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#8) #2513 CONNIE PIEPHO, 540 NORTH ARM DRIVE • VARIANCES, 7:57 p.m. • 8:01 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Connie Piepho, Applicant, was present.
Jenson stated the Applicant is requesting a variance to the average lakeshore setback to permit
construction of an inground pool, which is 830 square feet. The pool is large enough to be classified
as an oversized structure, which requires 15 feet from the property line. The pool itself is currently
proposed at 13 feet from the side property line. Staff is recommending that the pool be relocated
Page 8
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16,1999
(#2513 Connie Piepho, Continued)
two feet over to comply with the 15 foot setback.
Jenson stated upon further review of this application, Staff has discovered that the secondary
septic site is located between the home and the current septic system site. The Septic Code
requires all structures to be located at least 20 feet from the septic site. The pool in its proposed
location does not meet the required 20 feet and would need approval from the City's septic
inspector. Staff is not in favor of a reduced setback for the septic, but would be in favor of the
Applicants identifying a secondary septic site that meets the required setbacks elsewhere on the
lot.
Piepho stated they are attempting to comply with the City Codes as much as possible.
Kluth inquired whether an alternate septic site could be located on the property.
Piepho stated that there is a possible area in the front and that they would be willing to relocate the
pool two feet further from the property line.
Jenson suggested that approval be subject to submitt.^1 of documentation verifying an alternative
septic site.
Lindquist stated he would be willing to approve the average lakeshore setback but no other
variance?.
There were no public comments.
Smith commented that the pool should not encroach on any easements or secondary septic site.
Weinberger inquired whether the Applicant was planning to erect a fence around the pool, noting
that Orono only allows fences three and a half feet within the average lakeshore setback.
Piepho stated that a fence will not be constructed.
Stoddard noted that Orono does not require fences to be erected around pools.
Kluth moved, Stoddard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2513,
540 North Arm Drive, for an average lakeshore setba .* to permit construction of an
Inground pool subject to submittal of documentation verifying the location of a suitable
secondary septic site, with the understanding that no other variances should be required
on this application. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#9) #2515 TOM AND MAUREEN PALM, 1685 CONCORDIA STREET • VARIANCES, 8:02 p.m.
8:12 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Tom Palm, Applicant, was present.
Jenson stated the Applicants are proposing to construct a new 30’ by 30* garage in a different
location than the existing 24 ’ by 26' garage, as it is located partially over an existing sewer
easeinent. The existing garage is located 98 feet from the rear property line, with the proposed
Page 9
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16,1999
(#2515 Tom and Maureen Palm, Continued)
garage being located 48 feet from the same property line. Because the structure is considered to
be oversized, the sideyard setbacks are required to be 15 feet rather than the district 10 foot
standard. Staff is recommending that the garage be reduced by five feet in depth, which would
aHow the Applicants to maintain a three car garage and still meet the 10 foot setback
requirements.
Jenson stated a 750 square foot garaijS would reduce the existing hardcover to 28.9 percent in the
75-250' setback, with the current hard x)ver being calculated at 34 percent.
Palm indicated he would be in favor of reducing th« ^.‘^e of the garage to 25’ by 30 ’. Palm noted the
City has received two letters from his adjoining ne.^f«h <rsdicating support of this project.
Jenson stated the letters are included in the Planning Commission's packet.
Palm commented In his opinion this situation benefits everyone by reducing the existing hardcover
on the property and relocating the garage off the sewer easement.
Tom Trainor, 1675 Concordia Street, indicated that he was in support of the project.
John Gehring, 1687 Concordia Street, commented he also was in favor of the project.
Palm indicated he would be willing to reduce the size of the garage to 750 square feet.
Lindquist moved, Nygard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2515,
1685 Concordia Street, to permit construction of a 750 square foot garage and driveway as
depicted on the survey, with the understanding that the existing garage will be removed.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Item No. 10 follows Item 15
(#11) #2517 SCOTT AND LISA BITTMAN, 25 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCES, 8:15 p.m. •
8:22 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Scott Bittman, Applicant, was present.
Jenson stated the Applicants are requesting a front yard variance to add a second story to the
existing home, which was constructed 42.7 feet from the right-of-way to Brown Road South. Jenson
commented the lot is heavily wooded and the house is not visible from the road.
Jenson stated the addition was started without a building permit, with the rooi having been removed
by the time Staff had discovered the work. Staff allowed the work to continue with the understanding
that the variance would be applied for to make the addition legal.
Bittman had no comment.
There were no public comments.
Stoddard inquired why the work was commenced without a building permit.
Page 10
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16,1999
(#2517 Scott and Lisa Bittman, Continued)
Bittman stated that there was a previous second story to this residence, with the roof being removed
in an effort to determine the extent of the work needed. Bittman stated that a building permit had
been applied for prior to the work being commenced but the process took over two months for the
permit to be issued.
Jenson stated that an application for a building permit was submitted. Jenson commented that the
entire second story of the residence is being replaced.
Bittman stated they are replacing the second story due to the deteriorated state of the residence.
Kluth commented that he does not want to encourage people to commence work on their residences
without the appropriate building permits, noting that sometimes the improvements are required to be
tom down if the work is completed without the appropriate building permits.
Lindquist stated that normally a building permit is obtained within two weeks.
Bittman stated that' survey was required, which took two months to obtain
Weinberger stated the building inspector had given the approval for the work to continue due to
concerns regarding the present damage to the house.
Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2517,
25 Brown Road South, to allow a front yard variance to add a second story to the existing
home within the 50 foot setback to Brown Road South. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
(#13) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION
Mayor Jabbour stated the Planning Commission and City Council needs some continuity regarding
the issue of plastic underlayment and whether it should be considered as hardcover or legally
non-conforming. Jabbour stated he has a concern that people are trading in non-conforming
St jctures or hardcover in an effort to make their properties more legally conforming and that
perhaps the City Council and Planning Commission should take the view that the non-conforming
structures or hardcover should be immediately removed.
Kluth commented that it would be nice if the Planning Commission could be provided with copies
of all previous variance requests on a property whenever a new application is submitted.
Mayor Jabbour commented that perhaps the issue dealing with hardcover should be explained prior
to the application reaching the Planning Commission.
Smith suggested that the Applicants be given examples of what is allowed and not allowed for
hardcover as part of their application, especially if the property owner is new to the application
process.
Page 11
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16,1999
(#12) REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING COUNCIL
MEETINGS ON JULY 26.1999 AND AUGUST 9.1999
Smith stated she attended the July 26,1999 City Council meeting, where the Mayor had
complimented the Planning Commission for their fine efforts on the Peter Boynton application.
Mayor Jabbour stated in his opinion the demonstration of hardship as defined by statutes was good.
Smith stated the Bancor Group's request was heard at the meeting as well regarding rezoning and
the request for a PRD.
Mayor Jabbour commented that the City Council basically followed the recommendations of the
Planning Commission, noting that two of the City Council members were initially opposed to rezoning
of this property, with one of the members changing his mind at the end regarding one acre zoning.
Smith commented that there is a City Council workshop on August 26 regarding housing options.
Smith stated she has requested that Mike Gaffron inform the Planning Commission members
whenever comprehensive plan issues will be discussed.
Mayor Jabbour stated that the members of the Planning Commission are invited to attend the
workshop on the 26th.
Lindquist commented that he would like to get more advanced notice of some of these workshops,
noting in the past he has not always gotten much notice.
Stoddard stated that City Staff could utilize voice mail or fax to notify them of an upcoming
workshop.
Elizabeth Hawn attended the August 9,1999 City Council meeting but was not present at tonight's
meeting.
Weinberger stated that the Luzaichs' attorney is working with the City Attorney in an effort to
arrive at a mutual agreement regarding access by the City to the property to ensure reforestation.
(#14) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999
Smith stated she was present at this meeting, noting that her name is not mentioned in the roll.
Smith requested that corrections be made on Page 12 to reflect housing in the $350,000 to
$600,000 range as well as holding ponds are not to be turned into private beaches.
Lindquist moved. Kiuth seconded, to approve the Planning Commission Minutes for
July 19,1999, as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5 Nays 0.
(#15) SELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ON
AUGUST 23,1999 AND SEPTEMBER 13.1999
August 23 - Lindquist September 13 - Nygard
Page 12
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 16,1999
(#10) #2516 JEFF MARTtNEAU, 1420 SHORELINE DRIVE - VARIANCES
Jeff Martineau, Applicant, was not present.
Lindquist moved, Nygard seconded, to table Application #2516,1420 Shoreline Drive,
due to the absence of the Applicant. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned was 8:42 p.m.
Sandra Smith, Acting Chair
Page 13
REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1
DATE OF RUN 09/01/99
PERMIT TYPE
Building
SGL FAMILY-NEW
DUPLEX-NEW
SF-ADD/REMODEL
SF-ACC STRUCTURE
DEMO/PRINCIPAL
COMMERCIAL-rEW
COM-ADD/REMOOEL
COM-ACC STRUCTUR
DEMO
INST-ADD/REMODEL
DEMO-ACCESSORY
ACC/QARAGES
Sub-total
Mechanical
HEATING SYSTEMS
AIR CONDITIONING
WOOD STOVE/FLUE
FIREPLACE
VENTILATION
FUEL STORAGE
GAS LINE INSPECT
DUCT WORK ONLY
REMOVE OIL TANK
Sub-total
Plumbing
FIXTURES
SPRINKLER
WATER METER
VACUUM BREAKER
UNDEFINED
Sub-total
Sewer & Water
QTY
23
1
205
27
14
1
6
0
0
2
5
4
288*
81
17
2
43
7
1
14
6
5
176*
109
1
8
3
0
121*
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 7 1999 ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT
CITY OF ORONO
guy Ob UMOWO
. . . . . . CURRENT RANGE -
01/01/99 - 08/31/99
BASE FEE VALUATION
65,611
1,637
63,135
4,348
880
3,099
1,763
0
0
963
150
1,174
142,763
10,402
839
72
1,961
302
312
530
268
2,567
17,256
.20
.25
.95
.25
.00
.75
.00
.00
.00
.50
.00
.75
.65*
.08
.13
.50
.89
.50
.50
.00
.75
.55
. 90*
11,309,
250,
5,946,
261,
550,
131,
88,
93,
18,630,
661.55
000.00
572.24
110.00
0.00
000.00
375.00
0.00
0.00
000.00
0.00
425.00
143.79*
9,580.35
93.75
1,520.00
105.00
0.00
11,299.10*
817,492.90
55,885.50
4,200.00
116,483.85
14.440.00
25,000.00
14.150.00
12.750.00
200,583.79
1,260,986.04*
657,190.36
7,500.00
0.00
550.00
0.00
665,240.36*
SEWER CONNECTION 13 455.00 0.00
WATER CONNECTION 1 35.00 0.00
NEW SEPTIC SYSTE 18 1,670.00 0.00
:-.iNPLD t/OR TANK 1 50.00 0 00
'^AC ONLY 9 11,550.00 0.00
SEPTIC CONNECTIN 0 0.00 0.00
SEWER DISCONNECT 2 105.00 0.00
SEWER REPAIR 3 105.00 0.00
SEWER (• WATER 4 280.00 0.00
UNDEFINED 0 0.00 0.00
Sub-total 51*14,250.00*0.00*
Sign
PERMANENT/POSTED 1 48.50 1.500.00
PLAN REVIEW
42,647
1,064
29,213
2,695
0
2,014
810
0
0
0
0
763
79,209
.25
.21
.27
.71
.00
.84
.23
.00
.00
.00
.00
.59
.10*
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0.00
0.00*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00*
* * * * *
YEAR-TO-DATE PAGE: 1
REQUESTER: CAROLE
-- PREVIOUS RANGE -
01/01/98 - 08/31/98
QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW
23 61,753.50 11,404,331.44 40,139.73
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
250 58,849.75 5,102,963.26 25,251.05
27 7,984.00 802,240.00 5,094.72
12 630.00 0.00 0.00
1 6,365.25 1,492,000.00 4,137.41
5 1,784.00 191,875.00 941.36
5 1,462.25 110,000.00 105.46
1 50.00 0.00 0.00
3 902.25 122,480.00 0.00
6 180.00 0.00 0.00
19 4,237.25 291,715.20 2,731.73
352*144,198.25*19,517,604.90*78,404.46*
80 11,987.90 946,918.44 0.00
21 1,031.10 71,105.52 0.00
2 70.00 3,000.00 0.00
52 2,295.19 134,723.00 0.00
5 175.00 7,400.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 245.00 7,459.00 0.00
14 506.25 22,983.00 0.00
7 245.00 5,213.75 0.00
188*16,555.44*1,198,802.71*0.00*
125 10,284.41 708,703.38 0.00
1 82.75 6,620.00 0.00
9 1,635.00 1,225.00 0.00
9 315.00 2,450.00 0.00
1 35.00 600.00 0.00
145*12,352.16*719,598.38*0.00*
27 945.00 0.00 0.00
1 35.00 0.00 0.00
21 2,050.00 0.00 0.00
2 100.00 0.00 0.00
25 23,250.00 0.00 0.00
1 50.00 0.00 0.00
1 35.00 0.00 0.00
1 35.00 750.00 0.00
1 70.00 0.00 0.00
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
01*26,570.00*750.00*0.00*
0.00 137.25 7,800.00 0.00
YEAR-TO-DATE
REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1
DATE OF RUN 09/01/99
*«**•PERMIT ISSUED REPORT
CITY OF ORONO
PAGE! 2
REQUESTER; CAROLE
PERMIT TYPE
PER./FREE STANDG
TEMPORARY
Sub-total
Fire
FIRE SPRINKLER
FIRE SPRINKLER
Sub-total
User Detined
LAND ALTERATION
DOCKS
LAWN SPRINKLER
Sub-total
Grand-total
01/01/99 -
RANGE . . . .
08/31/99 01/01/98 -
RANGE . . . .
08/31/98
QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW
1 21.00 450.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 35.00 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 0.00 0.00
4*104.50*1,950.00*0.00*3*207.25*7,800.00*0.00*
1 297.50 23,800.00 0.00 0 O.CO 0.00 0.00
3 1,698.88 135,550.00 0.00 1 3,650.00 292,000.00 0.00
4*1,996.38*159,350.00*0.00*1*3,650.00*292,000.00*0.00*
12 580.00 0.00 0.00 27 1,450.00 500.00 0.00
1 30.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
9 315.00 0.00 0.00 23 805.00 0.00 0.00
22*925.00*0.00*0.00*50*2,255.00*500.00*0.00*
188,595.53** 20 ,717,670.19**79,209.10**820**205,788.10** 21 ,737,055.99**78,404.46**
m
m
YEAR-TO-DATE
REFORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1
DATE OP RUN 09/01/99
***** permit fee REPORT *****
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 01/01/99 TO 08/31/99
BUILDING MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER & WATER USER
BASE PEE 142.763.65 17.256.90 11.299.10 14.250.00 925.00
PLAN REVIEW 79.209.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 9.261.89 634.38 340.78 21.00 4.50
Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SAC 6.300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
INVESTIGATION 4.523.75 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00
DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAIL IN
MAIL IN
MAIL IN FEE
MAIL-IN FEE
145.12
1.50
18.49
4.50
53.98
4.50
4.50
1.50
ESCROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 242,058.39 18.060.89 11,698.36 14,371.00 1,035.50
REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1
DATE OP RUN 09/01/99
REPORT TOTAL
***** permit FEE REPORT *****
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 01/01/99 TO 08/31/99
BASE PEE 188,595.53
PLAN REVIEW 79,209.10
SURCHARGE 10,343.18
Lie. SEARCH PEE 0.00
SAC 6,300.00
INVESTIGATION 4,723.75
DEPOSIT 0.00
MAIL IN
MAIL IN
MAIL IN FEB
MAIL-IN PEE
209.60
1.50
24.49
4.50
ESCROW 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 289,411.65
PAOB: 1
RBQUBSTBR: CAROLE
SIGN
104.50
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.50
FIRE
1.996.38
0.00
79.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.50
0.00
106.75
0.00
2.080.76
PAGE: 2
REQUESTER: CAROLE
i
REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1
DATE OF RUN 09/01/99
***■■ ' PERMIT ISSUED REPORT
CITY OF ORONO
YEAR-TO-DATE
*****PAGE: 1
REQUESTER: CAROLE
-- CURRENT rang: -
01/01/99 - 08/31/99
-- PREVIOUS RANGE -
01/01/98 - 08/31/98
PERMIT TYPE
User Defined
SUBDIVISION
VARIANCE
CUP
SKETCH PLAN
VARIANCE/CUP
VACATION
REZONING
RQST SIMILAR USE
ZONING CODE AMEN
Sub-total
Grand-total
QTY BASE FEE VALUATION ?hPd< UEVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW
13 7,400.00 0.00 0.00 11 5,737.50 0.00 0.00
29 7,250.00 0.00 0.00 49
12,560.00 0.00 0.00
9 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 14 2,200.00 0.00 0.00
7 1,750.00 0.00 0.00 2 500.00 0.00 0.00
3 800.00 0.00 0.00 7 1,900.00 0.00 0.00
1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 300.00 0.00 0.00
1 350.00 0.00 0.00 1 350.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 250.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
65*19,550.00*0.00*0.00*87*23,797.50*0.00*0.00*
65**19,550.00**0.00**0.00**87**23,797.50**0.00**0.00**
REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1
DATE OF RUN 09/01/99
** PERMIT FEE REPORT
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 01/01/99 TO 08/31/99
*****
USER REPORT TOTAL
BASE FEE 19,550.00 19,550.00
PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00
Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00
SAC 0.00 0.00
INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00
DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00
ESCROW 0.00 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 19,550 00 19,550.00
PAGE: 1
REQUESTER: CAROLE
1999 RECAP OF CONTRACT CITIES
January February Narch April May June July August September October November December YTD Totals
Spring Park
Plan Review 40.46 274.14 0.00 2,760.22 2,063.10 1,576.90 3,095.31 1,389.54 11,199.67
Inspections 120.00 45.00 195.00 135.00 135.00 180.00 150.00 360.00 1,165.00
Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
200.00
TOTAL 185.46 344.14 220.00 2,920.22
2,223.10 1,781.90 3.2/ • 31 1,774.54 12,719.67
No. Plan Reviews 1 1 0 4 4 4 5 3 22
No. Inspections 8 3 13 9 9 12 10 24 88
Minnetonka Beach
Plan Review 568.59 0.00 72.96 326.79 787.80 739.21 4,565.86 1,636.86 8,698.07
Inspections 60.00 45.00 150.00 135.00 60.00 180.00 300.00 435.00 1,365.00
Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.no 25.00 25.00 200.00
TOTAL 653.59 70.00 247.96 486.79 872.80 944.21 4,690.86 2,096.86 10,263.07
No. Plan Reviews 1 0 1 1 2 1 7 3 16
No. Inspections 4 3 10 9 4 12 20 29 91
839.v:.414.14 467.96 3,407.01 3,095.90 2,726.11 8,161,17 3,871.40 22,962.74
DATE OP RUN
PERMIT TYPE
Building
SGL FAMILY-NEW
SF-AOD/REMODEL
SF-ACC STRUCTURE
DEMO/PRINCIPAL
DEMO
INST-ADD/REMODEL
DEMO-ACCESSORY
ACC/GARAGES
Sub-total
Mechanical
5S-1
'99
cm INCIL MEETINQ
SEP 2 7 1999
*****
range _ _ _
PERMIT ISSUED REPORT
CITY OF ORONO
AUGUST
*****
1999
no c•x/Tr^Tlc?
PAGE:
REQUESTER: CAROLE
QTY
AtCItY -
BASE FEE
08/31/99
VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY
08/01/98 -
BASE FEE
------
08/31/98
VALUATION PLAN REVIEW
2 5,332.00 820,000.00 3,465.80 4 12,236.25 2 ,488,355.44 7,954.86
31 13,515.20 1 ,401,420.00 6,767.82 32 7,684.00 601,733.01 3,475.224697.00 37,700.00 453.04 4 895.25 77,560.00 568.27
1 50.00 0.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.0000.00 0.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.0000.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.0000.00 0.00 0.00 2 60.00 0.00 0.001167.25 9,000.00 108.71 5 984.75 62,933.20 640.1039*19,761.45*2,268,120.00*10,795.37*50*21,962.25*3,230,581.65*12,638.45*
HEATING SYSTEMS 9 1,481.10 118,487.00 0.00 25 3,844.71 304,120.00 0.00AIR CONDITIONING 5 365.00 25,650.00 0.00 8 334.28 19,842.00 0.00FIREPLACE5237.50 15,500.00 0.00 6 282.50 17,700.00 0.00GAS LINE INSPECT 3 105.00 750.00 0.00 2 70.00 1,800.00 0.00DUCT WORK ONLY 2 70.00 2,750.00 0.00 2 72.50 4,000.00 0.00REMOVE OIL TANK 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,475.00 0.00Sub-total 24*2,258.60*163,137.00*0.00*44*4,638.99*348,937.00*0.00*
Plumbing
FIXTURES 12 744.88 46,893 36 0.00 14 1,027.00 66,187.00 0.00WATER METER 2 360.00 0.00 0.00 3 209.00 1,225.00 0.00VACUUM BREAKER 2 70.00 450.00 0.00 2 70.00 700.00 0.00UNDEFINED00.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 600.00 0.00Sub-total 16*1,174.88*47,348.36*0.00*20*1,341.00*68,712.00*0.00*
Sewer & Water
SEWER CONNECTION 5 175.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00WATER CONNECTION 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00NEW SEPTIC SYSTE 3 300.00 0.00 0.00 1 100.00 0.00 0.00SAC ONLY 5 5,250.00 0.00 0.00 1 1,000.00 0.00 0.00SEWER 6 WATER 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-total 15*5,830.00*0.00*0.00*2*1,100.00*0.00*0.00*
Sign
PERMANENT/POSTED 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 137.25 7,800.00 0.00TEMPORARY00.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00Sub-total 0*0.00*0.00*0.00*2*172.25*7,800.00*0.00*
User Defined
LAND ALTERATION 2 100.00 0.00 0.00 10 600.00 0.00 0 00
LAWN SPRINKLER 3 1 . j.OO 0.00 0.00 4 140.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-total 5*205.00*0.00*0.00*14*740.00*0.00*0.00*
Grand-total 99**29,229.93**2,478,605.36**10,795.37**332**29,954.49**3,656,030.65**12,638.45**
AUGUST 1999
REPORT NBR. BFBERPTl-1
DATE OF RUN 09/01/99
** PERMIT FEE REPORT *****
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 00/01/99 TO 08/31/99
USER
PERMIT NIMBER
ADDRESS:
USER
BASE FEE
PLAN REVIEW
SURCHARGE
Lie. SEARCH FEE
SAC
INVESTIGATION
DEPOSIT
MAIL IN FEE
MAIL-IN FEE
MAIL IN
ESCROW
205.00
0.00
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.50
1.50
0.00
ono «;n
REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1
DATE OP RUN 09/01/99
«»*** permit fee
CITY OF
FROM 08/01/99
REPORT
ORONO
TO 00/31/99
PAGE:
REQUESTER: CAROLE
BUILDING MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER & WATER USER SIGN FIRE
BASE FEE 19,761.45 2,250.60 1,174.00 5,030.00 205.00 0.00 0.00
PLAN REVIEW 10,795.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 1,134.57 82.74 25.65 5.00 1.50 0.00 0.00
Lie. SEARCH FEB 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SAC 1,050.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
INVESTIGATION 209.2%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAIL IN PEE
MAIL-IN FEE
MAIL IN
18.49
4.50
4.50 1.50
1.50
ESCROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 32,950.64 2,364.33 1,205.03 5,035.00 209.50 0.00 0.00
PAGE: 31
REQUESTER: CAROLE
WED, SEP 1, xi)99, 1:25 PM
PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 1999
PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY
PAGE 1
39C
ME
01
01
02
02
02
02
02
02
02
04
05
05
05
0€
06
06
09
09
10
*.l
11
11
11
11
11
15
16
18
24
24
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
33
39C
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
02
1130 LOMA MNDA AVE
2102 SUGARWOOD DR
1020 FOX ST
1070 TONKAWA RD
2745 ETHEL AVE
3030 CASCO POINT RD
480 DEBORAH DR
1406 BOHNS PT RD
1375 PARK DR
2300 BAYVIEW PL
3045 BAYSIDE RD
4225 WATERTOWN RD
1331 NORTH ARM DR
1337 REST PT RD
80 TRUFFULA TR
2703 WALTERS PORT LA
650 BROWN RD N
1830 LAKEVIEW TER
3399 CRYSTAL BAY RD
2413 CARMAN ST
2328 OLIVE AVE
500 NORTH ARM DR
1720 SHADYWOOD RD
3229B CASCO CIR
175 LANDMARK DR
1130 NORTH SHORE DR W
450 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
1130 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD
680 ORCHARD PK RD
1670 SHADYWOOD RD
2074 CASCO POINT RD
100 FERNDALE GREEN
2684 LYDIARD AVE
400 OXFORD RD
4735 TONKAVIEW LA
2775 COUNTRYSIDE DR W
60 CRYSTAL CREEK RD
4745 NORTH SHORE DK
2601 WEST LAFAYETTE RD
1800 CONCORDIA ST
2050 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY
2515 KELLY AVE
140 CRYSTAL CREEK RD
1100 MILLSTON RD
4140 NORTH SHORE OR
2515 KELLY AVE
500 NORTH ARM DR
3580 BAYSIDE RD
3485 CHRISTINE DR
2200 SHADYWOOD RD
4465 FOREST LAKE UVNDING
2695 CASCO POINT RD
99/08/17 OR-
99/08/24 OR-
99/08/03 OR-
99/00/10 OR-
99/08/24 OR-
99/08/27 OR-
99/08/26 OR-
99/00/30 OR-
99/00/31 OR-
99/00/25 OR-
99/08/03 OR-
99/08/09 OR-
99/08/12 OR-
99/08/20 OR-
99/00/09 OR-
99/08/23 OR-
99/00/13 OR-
99/08/26 OR-
99/08/03 OR-
99/00/06 OR-
99/08/18 OR-
99/00/19 OR-
99/08/19 OR-
99/00/25 OR-
99/00/25 OR-
99/08/09 OR-
99/08/04 OR-
99/00/05 OR-
99/08/30 OR-
99/08/30 OR-
99/00/30 OR-
99/00/26 OR-
99/08/09 OR-
99/08/20 OR-
99/08/11 OR-
99/00/18 OR-
99/08/25 OR-
99/08/23 OR-
99/08/26 OR-
011728
011772
011708
011758
011779
011795
011796
011797
011805
011792
011649
011726
011747
011711
011729
011777
011752
011774
011717
011731
011764
011766
011768
011793
011794
011735
011721
011725
011732
011771
011313
011417
011502
011712
011730
011757
011773
011787
011802
99/08/03 OR-
99/00/11 OR-
99/00/11 OR-
99/08/16 OR-
99/00/16 OR-
99/00/17 OR-
99/00/17 OR-
99/00/20 OR-
99/08/24 OR-
99/00/04 OR-
99/08/05 OR-
99/08/09 OR-
99/08'10 OR-
011714
011745
011746
011753
011754
011T61
011763
011770
011790
011719
011723
011738
011739
15992525
19449499
19289262
14754902
14746976
14710532
19740004
18882225
12211823
00000000
00000000
17509476
00000000
00000000
15530394
00000000
19333010
19332255
17842646
14719065
00000000
15410304
15935325
15410304
15410304
00000000
14040600
14445353
15024777
15024777
15024777
14753330
00000000
14710532
00000000
15223181
00000000
00000000
19419018
35531445
39396767
36332561
34283677
39203800
34727360
39414211
37575040
36332561
33386606
35378491
34451900
34791600
STRATFORD PROPERTIES INC
LECY CONST INC
AULIK & LULOFF
PILLAR HOMES
SJ FISHER CONSTRUCTION
DANBERRY COMPANY
KEITH WATERS & ASSOC
PLEKKENPOL BUILDERS INC
VISION CONTRACTING
DZURIK CONST INC
NEW IMAGE CONSTR INC
PETERSON POOLS
CUSTOM POOLS INC
CUSTOM REMODLERS INC
INCLINE ENTERRISES
WESTURN CEDAR SUPPLY
ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC
WESTURN CEDAR SUPPLY
WESTURN CEDAR SUPPLY
JYLAND DEVELOPMENT
YERIGAN CONSTRUCTION CO
RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN
RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN
RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN
LAUER HOMES, INC.
DANBERRY COMPANY
KLOSTER KUSTOM DESIGN INC
JLM LANDSCAPE
GUYERS BUILDERS EXPRESS
VOGT FRED & CO
FIRESIDE CORNER
HEATING & COOLING TWO
CRONSTROMS HTG V AC INC
TRIPLE D FURNACE
KLEVE DTG & AC
DEPENDABLE HTG & AC
FIRESIDE CORNER
WOODLAND STOVES&FIRFPLACES
SUPERIOR CONTR INC
ADVANTAGF. /.Ik
COUNTRYSIDE IITG A/C
OWNER LAST NM VALUATION
170,000.00
K1.'^*TS 650,000.00
MACMILLAN 690,000.00
PETRILLO 47,200.00
JENSEN 36,500.00
RONNINGEN 80,000.00
HOFFmN 150,000.00
CHAPMAN 11,900.00
MURPHY 65,000.00
BELCOURT 9,000.00
THIESSE 6,500.00
PADDON 11,100.00
BEUTLER 2,200.00
ZAUN 1,200.00
MAHERSWARI 6,000.00
REESE 10,000.00
GARRETT 13,700.00
OWINGS 18,000.00
SOBIENIAK 15,000.00
LAUER 1,300.00
JACOBSON 2,500.00
15,310.00
PEMBERTON 8,380.00
SWENSON 24,239.00
HARREN 14,061.00
HOLZER 3,000.00
GARRETT .00
COLWELL 6,000.00
WINTERS 3,495.00
KIELLEY 4,335.00
SAIKI 5,000.00
LAUER 50.000.00
L'ALLIER 1,200.00
CARTER 10,000.00
WHITMAN 1,000.00
BURKE 32,000.00
50,000.00
CRAWFORD 40,000.00
OLSON 3,000.03
DANBERRY 1,000.00
18,000.00
MAUES 3,300.00
12,000.00
BURWELL 2,000.00
KALLERUP 7,000.00
HARDTEN 54,450.00
JOHNSON 950.00
1,100.00
HAGDERG 4,700.00
YOUNG 1,500.00
BIJVCKSTONE 1,800.00
STANDA 5,852.00
PAGE 2
WED, SEP 1, 1999, 1:25 PM
PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF
PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET
AUGUST 1999
ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY --_ _. . . . . . . . . . .
ME
16C
SW
15C
UD
02
02
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
29
24C
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
14
24
24
29
29
16C
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
19
29
15C
01
01
01
01
01
5C
2430
405
3125
2760
4448
4045
420
2709
1520
2775
265
2659
4135
1405
4685
2280
2114
3510
781
4465
420
405
1233
2740
1070
1740
100
1555
865
965
965
1045
1045
1055
320
320
250
825
985
985
865
1740
3222
525
2500
2280
135
THOROUGHBRED LA.
WILLOW DR S
FOX ST
WHITE OAK CIR
NORTH SHORE DR
BAYSIDE RD
TONKAWA RD
WALTERS PORT LA
FOX ST
COUNTRYSIDE DP W
HOLLANDER RD
CASCO POINT RD
DAYSICS RD
REST PT RD
TONKAVIEW LA
SHADOWOOD DR
SUGARWOOD DR
BAYSIDE RD
FERNDALE RD W
FOREST LAKE LANDING
TONKAWA RD
WILLOW DR S
BRIAR ST
CAROLINE AVE
TONKAWA RD
CONCORDIA ST
FERNDALE GRFEN
ORONO OAKS DR
FERNDALE RD N
EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
WOODHILL RD
WOODHILL RD
OLD CRYSTAI P.aY RD
BROWN RD r.
EDGEWOOD • *LLS RD
EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
FERHDALF RD N
concord:.- ST
NORTH SHORE DP
HUNTER PASS
6TH AVE N
SHADOWOOD DR
CRYSTAL CREEK RD
99/08/17
99/08/24
99/08/02
99/08/03
99/08/05
99/08/05
99/00/09
99/08/10
99/08/24
99/08/26
99/08/20
99/08/04
99/08/10
99/08/11
99/08/11
99/00/13
99/08/19
99/08/23
99/08/24
99/00/09
99/00/09
99/00/19
99/OP '10
99/00/17
99/08/30
99/08/03
99/08/26
99/00/05
99/08/16
99/00/23
99/08/23
99/08/23
99/08/23
99/08/23
99/00/23
99/08/23
99/08/25
99/08/25
99/00/31
99/08/31
99/08/16
99/08/03
OR-011762
OR-011709
OR-011707
OR-011718
OR-011722
OR-011724
OR-011734
OR-011742
OR-011788
OR-011801
OR-011769
OR-
OR-
OR-
OR-
OR
OR-
OR
CR
OR
OR
OR
OR
3R
OR
OR
OR
011720
011741
011743
011744
011751
011767
011775
011791
011733
011736
•011765
■0 1737
-011760
■011007
■0117x6
■011003
OR-011727
OR-011755
OR-011780
OR-011701
OR-011782
OR-011783
OR-011704
O” -011785
OR-011786
OR-011799
OR-011900
OR-011008
OR-011809
OR-011756
OR-011715
99/08/30 OR-011709
99/08/02 OR-011710
99/00/02 OR-011713
99/00/13 OR-011750
99/00/25 OR-011790
39414211
25432727
39414211
39414211
34732267
35421166
34283677
38819000
37576200
35429839
34789550
28017974
29332836
29337200
29337200
29335636
24598180
24340445
24340445
28017974
24738793
25432727
24490147
27539244
25334357
24720805
29337717
54425855
OGOOOOOG
00000000
54709579
00000000
54709579
54789579
00000000
54709579
54791762
54791762
00000000
54709579
54270109
24720805
00000000
89411138
00000000
89333999
09411138
KLFVE HTG & AC
CROW RIVER PLBG/HTG
KLEVE HTG & AC
KLEVE HTG & AC
SABRE HEATING & AIR CONDIT
FLARE HTG & AC
HEATING & COOLING TWO
SEDGWICK HTG U AC CO
BLAINE HTG AC & ELEC INC
UNITED HEATING A/c INC.
DITTER INC
PLUMBING PLUS
DOUGS PLUMBING
CULLIGAN
CULLIGAN
DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SERV.
FIVE STAR PLUMBING INC
CLEARWATER SYSTEMS
CLEARWATER SYSTEMS
PLUMBING PLUS
CITYVIEW PLBC & HTG
CROW RIVER PLBG/HTG
CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC.
SHILOAH WATER COMPANY, INC
PLYMOUTH PLUMBING
ALS MASTER PLUMBING
THOMPSON PLBG
SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES
G L CONTRACTING
G L CONTRACTING
G L CONTRACTING
G L CONTRACTING
HAYES EXCAVATING
HAYES EXCAVATING
G L CONTRACTING
PERKINS CONTRACTING
ALS MASTLk '’LUMBINO
AQUA ENGINEERING, INC.
MASTER SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
AQUA ENGINEERING, INC.
50.00
PRIEDEMAN 3,150.00
CARLSON 5,400.00
SHANNON 2150.00
SENN 6,100.00
BOON 2,000.00
GAGE 6,500.00
DUNKLEY 16,235.00
PARKER C,200.00
BURKE 200.CO
DOEPKE 500.00
STANDA 2,000.00
HAYSSEN 300.00
OLSON 208.50
MEYER 204.86
COLEMAN 150.00
.00
1,300.00
3,000.00
BLACKSTONE 2,000.00
GAGE 14,000.00
PRIEDEMAN 1,792.00
FRANK 600.00
ROSSTEDT 600.00
9,290.00
BELAWSKI .00
10,900.00
HAUSER .00
.00
CUSICK .00
CUSIK .00
KEITH .00
KEITH .00
JACKSON .00
PAULUCCI .00
PAULUCCI .00
STICKNEY .00
BOHL .00
BOWEN .00
BOWEN .00
.00
BELAWSKI .00
ANDERSON .00
STROBEL .00
ERICKSEN .00
COLEMAN .00
GOODWALD .00
99C 2,478,605.36’'-
WED. SEP 1, .^99,
NUMERICAL LISTING
1:24 PM PAGE 1
AUGUST 1999
PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION
SAIKI 5,000.00
LAUER 50,000.00
L'ALLIER 1,200.00
THIESSE 6,500.00
CARLSON 5,400.00
MACMILLAN 690,000.00
ANDERSON .00
STROBEL .00
ZAUN 1,200.00
CARTER 10,000.00
ERICKSEN .00
DANBERRY 1,000.00
BELAWSKI .00
BELAWSKI .00
SOBIENI\*.15,000.00
SHANNON 2,150.00
HAGBERG 4,700.00
STANDA 2,000.CO
GARREIT .01)
SENN 6,100.00
YOU14G 1,500.00
BOON 2,000.00
COLWELL '',000.0c
PADDON 11,100.00
HAUSER .00
BOCKMANN 170,000.00
MAHERSWARI 6,000.00
WHITMAN 1,000.00
LAUER 1,300.00
WINTERS 3,495.00
BIACKSTONE 2,000.00
GAGE 8,500.00
HOLZER 3,000.00
GAGE 14,000.00
FRANK 600.00
BLACKSTONE 1,800.00
STANDA 5,852.00
IIAYSSEN 300.00
DUNKLEY 16,235.00
OLSON 208.50
MEYER 204.86
18,000.00
MAUES 3,300.00
BEUTLER 2,200.00
COLEMAN .00
COLEMAN 150.00
GARRETT 13,700.00
12,000.00
BURWELL 2,000.00
.00
.00
BURKE 32,000.00
PETRILLO 47,200.00
ROSSTEDT 600.00
OR-011313
OR-011417
OR-011S02
OR-011649
OR-011707
OR-011708
OR-011709
OR-011710
OR-011711
OR-011712
OR-011713
OR-011714
OR-011715
OR-011716
OR-011717
OR-011718
OR-011719
OR-011720
OR-011721
OR-011722
OR-011723
OR-011724
OR-011725
OR-011726
OR-011727
OR-011728
OR-011729
OR-011730
OR-011731
OR-011732
OR-011733
OR-011734
OR-011735
OR-011736
OR-011737
OR-011738
OR-011739
OR-011741
OR-011742
OR-011743
OR-011744
OR-011745
OR-011746
OR-011747
OR-011750
OR-011751
OR-011752
OR-011753
OR-011754
OR-011755
OR-011756
OR-011757
OR-011758
OR-011760
99/08/30 N
99/08/26 N
99/08/09 N
99/08/03 N
99/08/02 N
99/08/03 N
99/08/30 N
99/08/02 N
99/08/20 N
99/08/20 N
99/08/02 N
99/08/03 N
99/08/03 N
99/08/03 N
99/08/03 N
99/08/03 N
99/08/04 N
99/08/04 N
99/08/04 N
99/08/05 N
99/08/05 N
91'v«l/05 N
08/05 N
99/08/09 N
99/08/05 N
99/08/17 N
99/08/09 N
99/08/11 N
99/08/06 N
99/08/30 N
99/08/09 N
99/08/09 N
99/08/09 N
99/00/09 N
99/08/10 N
99/08/09 N
99/08/10 N
99/00/10 N
99/08/10 N
99/08/11 N
99/08/11 N
99/08/11 N
99/08/11 N
99/08/12 N
99/08/13 N
99/08/13 N
99/08/13 N
99/08/16 N
99/08/16 N
99/08/16 N
99/08/16 N
99/08/18 N
99/08/18 II
99/0n/l7 N
2874
100
2684
3845
3125
1820
3222
525
1337
400
2500
1800
1740
1740
3399
2760
3485
2659
450
4448
2200
4045
1130
4225
1555
1130
80
4735
2413
680
4465
420
1130
420
1233
4465
2695
4135
2709
1405
4685
2850
2515
1331
2280
2280
650
140
1100
865
865
2775
1070
2740
CASCO POINT RD
FERNDALE GREEN
LYDIARD AVE
BAYSIDE RD
FOX ST
FOX ST
NORTH SHORE DR
HUNTER PASS
REST PT RD
OXFORD RD
6TH AVE N
CONCORDIA ST
CONCORDIA ST
CONCORDIA ST
CRYSTAL BAY RD
WHITE OAK CIR
CHRISTINE DR
CASCO POINT RD
ORONO ORCHARD RD S
NORTH SHORE DR
SHADYWOOD RD
BAYSIDE RD
OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S
WATERTOWN RD
ORONO OAKS DR
LOMA LINDA AVE
TRUFFULA TR
TONKAVIEW LA
CARMAN ST
ORCHARD PK RD
FOREST LAKE LANDING
TONKAWA RD
NORTH SHORE DR W
TONKAWA RD
BRIAR ST
FOREST LAKE LANDING
CASCO POINT RD
BAYSIDE RD
WALTERS PORT LA
REST PT RD
TONKAVIEW LA
LITTLE ORCHARD WAY
KELLY AVE
NORTH ARM Dk
SHADOWOOD DR
SHADOWOOD DR
BROWN RD N
CRYSTAL CREEK RD
MILLSTON RD
FERNDALE RD N
FERNDALE RD N
COUNTRYSIDE DR W
TONKAWA RD
CAROLINE AVE
29 15024777
29 14753330
29 00000000
05 00000000
24 39414211
02 19289262
01 00000000
01 89411138
06 00000000
29 14710532
01 00000000
01 35531445
29 24720805
29 24720805
10 17842646
24 39414211
02 33386606
01 28017974
16 14040600
24 34732267
02 35378491
24 35421166
18 14445353
05 17509476
01 54425855
01 15992525
06 15530394
29 00000000
11 14719065
24 15024777
02 28017974
24 34283677
15 00000000
02 24738793
14 24490147
02 34451900
02 3479x600
01 29332836
24 38819000
01 29337200
01 29337200
01 39296767
01 36332561
05 00000000
01 89333999
01 29335636
09 19333010
01 34283677
01 39203800
01 00000000
19 54270109
29 15223181
02 14754902
24 27539244
RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN
LAUE? HOMES, INC.
KLEVE HTG & AC
AULIK & LULOFF
AQUA ENGINEERING, INC.
DANBERRY COMPANY
GUYERS BUILDERS EXPRESS
ALS MASTER PLUMBING
ALS MASTER PLUMBING
CUSTOM REMODLERS INC
KLEVE HTG & AC
WOODLAND STOVES&FIREPLACES
PLUMBING PLUS
JYLAND DEVELOPMENT
SABRE HEATING & AIR CONDIT
SUPERIOR CONTR INC
FLARE HTG U AC
YERIGAN CONSTRUCTION CO
DZURIK CONST INC
SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES
STRATFORD PROPERTIES INC
NEW IMAGE CONSTR INC
INCLINE ENTERRISES
RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN
PLUMBING PLUS
HEATING & COOLING TWO
CITYVIEW PLHG fii HTG
CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC.
ADVANTAGE AIR
COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C
DOUGS PLUMBING
SEDGWICK HTG & AC CO
CULLIGAN
CULLIGAN
VOGT FRED CO
FIRESIDE CORNER
MASTER SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SERV.
PETERSON POOLS
HEATING & COOLING TWO
CRONSTROMS HTG k AC INC
PERKINS CONTRACTING
KLOSTER KUSTOM DESIGN INC
PILLAR HOMES
WED, SEP 1, 1999, 1:24 PM
NUMERICAL LISTING
PiiGB 2
AUGUST 1999
PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION
KALLERUP
SKOGLUND 50.00
HARDTEN 54,450.00
JACOBSON 2,500.00
PRIEDEMAN 2,795.00
15,310.00
.00
PEMBERTON 8,380.00
DOEPKE 500.00
JOHNSON 950.00
KIELLEY 4,335.00
KIMMIS 650,000.00
50,000.00
OWINGS 18,000.00
1,300.00
REESE 10,000.00
JENSEN 36,500.00
CUSICK .00
CUSIK .00
KEITH ;00
KEITH .00
JACKSON .00
PAULUCCI .00
PAULUCCI .00
CRAWFORD 40,000.00
PARKER 5,200.00
PRIEDEMAN 3.150.00
1.100.00
3,000.00
BELCOURT 9,000.00
SWENSON 24,239.00
HARREN 14,061.00
RONNINGEN 80,000.00
HOFFMAN 150,000.00
CHAPMAN 11,900.00
GOODWALD .00
STICKNEY .00
BOHL .00
BURKE 200.00
OLSON 3,000.00
10,900.00
MURPHY 65,000.00
9,290.00
BOWEN .00
BOWEN .00
OR-011761
OR-011762
OR-011763
OR-011764
OR-011765
OR-011766
OR-011767
OR-011760
OR-011769
OR-011770
OR-011771
OR-011772
OR-011773
OR-011774
OR-011775
OR-011777
OR-011779
OR-011780
OR-011701
OR-011702
OR-011703
OR-011704
OR-011705
OR-011706
OR-011707
OR-011700
OR-011709
OR-011790
OR-011791
OR-011792
OR-011793
OR-011794
OR-011795
OR-011796
OR-011797
OR-011790
OR-011799
OR-011000
OR-011001
OR-011002
OR-011003
OR-011005
OR-011007
OR-011000
OR-011009
99C
99/00/17 N
99/00/17 N
99/00/17 N
99/00/10 N
99/00/19 N
99/00/19 N
99/00/19 N
99/00/19 N
99/00/20 N
99/08/20 N
99/08/30 N
99/00/24 N
99/08/25 N
99/00/26 N
99/00/23 N
99/0^/23 N
99/00/24 N
99/00/23 N
99/00/23 N
99/08/23 N
99/00/23 N
99/00/23 N
99/00/23 N
99/00/23 N
99/00/23 N
99/08/24 N
99/00/24 N
99/00/24 N
99/00/24 N
99/00/25 N
99/08/25 N
99/08/25 N
99/08/27 N
99/08/26 N
99/08/30 N
99/08/25 N
99/00/25 N
99/00/25 N
99/08/26 N
99/08/26 N
99/00/26 N
99/08/31 N
99/00/30 N
99/00/31 N
99/00/31 N
4140 NORTH SHORE DR
2430 THOROUGHBRED LA
2515 KELLY AVE
2328 OLIVE AVE
405 WILLOW DR S
580 NORTH ARM DR
2114 SUGARWOOD DR
1720 SHADYWOOD RD
265 HOLLANDER RD
580 NORTH ARM DR
1670 SHADYWOOD RD
2102 SUGARWOOD DR
60 CRYSTAL CREEK RD
1830 LAKEVIEW TER
3510 BAYSIDE RD
2703 WALTERS PORT LA
2745 ETHEL AVE
965 EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
965 EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
1045 EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
1045 EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
1055 EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
320 WOODHILL RD
320 WOODHILL RD
4745 NORTH SHORE DR
1520 FOX ST
405 WILLOW DR S
3580 BAYSIDE RD
701 FERNDALE RD W
2300 BAYVIEW PL
3229B CASCO CIR
175 LANDMARK DR
3030 CASCO POINT RD
480 DEBORAH DR
1406 BOHNS PT RD
135 CRYSTAL CREEK RD
250 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD
025 BROWN RD S
2775 COUNTRYSIDE DR W
2601 WEST LAFAYETTE RD
100 FERNDALE GREEN
1375 PARK DR
1070 TONKAWA RD
985 EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
985 EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
01 34727360
02 39414211
01 39414211
11 00000000
02 25432727
11 15410304
01 24598180
11 15935325
29 34789558
01 37575040
24 15024777
01 19449499
29 00000000
09 19332255
01 24340445
06 00000000
02 14746976
01 00000000
01 54799579
01 00000000
01 54789579
01 54789579
01 00000000
01 54789579
29 00000000
24 37576200
02 25432727
01 36332561
01 24340445
04 00000000
11 15410304
11 15410304
02 14710532
02 19740004
02 18882225
01 09411138
01 54791762
01 54791762
24 35429839
33 19419018
29 29337717
02 12211823
24 25334357
01 00000000
01 54709579
TRIPLE D FURNACE
KLEVE HTG & AC
KLEVE HTG & AC
CROW RIVER PLBG/HTG
WESTORN CEDAR SUPPLY
FIVE STAR PLUMBING INC
ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC
DITTER INC
DEPENDABLE HTG & AC
RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN
LECY CONST INC
CUSTOM POOLS INC
CLEARWATER SYSTEMS
SJ FISHER CONSTRUCTION
G L CONTRACTING
G L CONTRACTING
G L CONTRACTING
G L CONTRACTING
BLAINE HTG AC & ELEC INC
CROW RIVER PLBG/HTG
FIRESIDE CORNER
CLEARWATER SYSTEMS
WESTURN CEDAR SUPPLY
WESTURN CEDAR SUPPLY
DANBERRY COMPANY
KEITH WATERS & ASSOC
PLEKKENPOL BUILDERS INC
AQUA ENGINEERING, INC.
HAYES EXCAVATING
HAYES EXCAVATING
UNITED HEATING A/C INC.
JLM LANDSCAPE
THOMPSON PLBG
VISION CONTRACTING
PLYMOUTH PLUMBING
G L CONTRACTING
01 Residence 24 Replacing Existing
02 Addition 25 Lifting Principal Residence
03 Garage/Attached 26 Well Abandonment
04 Garage/Detached ■.27 Foundation Only
05 Porch 28 Temporary Trailer
06 Deck 29 Renovate/Remodel
07 Fence 30 Accessory Structure
08 Gazebo 31 Stairway to Lake
09 Pool 32 Retaining Wall
10 Re-side 33 Entrance Monuments
11 Re-roof 34 Tree Removal
12 Tennis Court
13 Sign
e
14 Dock •
15 Shed
16 Demo-Principal Structure
17 Demo-Accessory Structure
18 Move
19 Commercial
20 Institutional
21 Storm Damage Repair
22 1-100 Cubic Yards
23 101 Cubic Yards or More •
99 Undefined
9999
LOCAL CODES
Undefined
REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1
DATE OF RUN 09/01/99
• PERMIT ISSUED REPORT
CITY OF ORONO
*****AUGUST 1999 PAGE: 1
REQUESTER: CAROLE
00/01/99 -
RANGE . . . .
08/31/99 08/01/98 -
RANGE. . . .
08/31/98
PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW
User Defined
SUBDIVISION
VARIANCE
CUP
VARIANCB/CUP
REZONING
Sub-total
0
0
0
0
0
0*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00*
1
5
1
2
1
10*
200. C'.
1,000.00
250.00
600.00
350.00
2,400.00*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00*
Grand-total 0**0.00**0.00**0.00**10**2,400.00**0.00**0.00**
REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1
DATE OF RUN 09/01/99
***** permit FEE REPORT **
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 08/01/95 TO 08/31/99
PAGE: 1
REQUESTER: CAROLE
USER REPORT TOTAL
BASE FEE 0.00 0.00
PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00
Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00
SAC 0.00 0.00
INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00
DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00
ESCROW 0.00 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 0.00 0.00
COi
SEP 2 7 \999
C.lOrOHONO
* 'I r •. • ^
S25 Ferndale Road North
Wayzata, Minnesota S5391
^ L
r.
Cin-r . '''
September 18,1999
Mayor Gabriel Jabbour
OroQO City Offices
2750 Kelly Paricway
Orono, Mimiesota S53S6
Re: Construction Ferndale Road
Dear Mayor,
We would like to thank the entire crew that worked this past summer on the
rebuilding of Ferndale Road North. They did a superb job to make our road
both attractive and safe.
They worked under intense heat, humidity and other adverse conditions and
were always courteous and industrious. A special thanks to Leo Pawelsky,
construction chiefs who was always open to listening and to keeping us
informed of the progress.
They are all to be commended and we are proud of the job that *'iey have done!
Sincerely,
Peggy and Jim Ogland
9/18/99 'MCIL MEETING
SEP Z 7 1999
City of Orono
Attn.: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour
and Council Members
Cl nr ui- OHOoio
Re: William W. Wear
Orono Shopping Center
I have recently learned there is some confusion among some council
members regarding the lights that were installed in our new canopy and
if they meet the definition of recess lighting. The lights of the canopy are
suppose to be recessed based on the statement made to the council
members by the representative of Griffin Petroleum Ser.ices, Inc. John
Zadurski.
Until we applied for the sign permit we were not aware that there was a
problem regarding this issue among the council members. It has now
been brought to our attention and we will work with the council to
resolve this issue. A staff member has told us the recess light means the
light is recess. We do not want the lights on our canopy to become an
issue with the council over our request for the sign permit.
It was my understanding based on the last meeting with Zoning
Administrator, Paul Weinberger and Suburban Lighting to do the sign
work and proceed with the sign as proposed, which we have. Only, to
now learn we must reapply for a variance permit and start all over, and
we may have to do the sign all over again.
William W. Wear
Orono Shopping Center
2160 W. Wayzata Blvd.
Long Lake, MN 55356
i
COI'NCILMEETING
xy SEP 2 7 1999
UnturoHC^CITYofORONO
MunkiiMl Oflkcs
'\v StTMt MdriSS:
2750 Kellty Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
MalliRf Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066
September 17, 1999
William E. Bruning
315 Silver Meadow Drive
Orono, MN 55356
Dear Mr. Bruning;
I am writing, on behalf of Mayor Jabbour and the Orono City Council, in response to your recent
letter regarding the Highway 12 project. Your letter lists a number of concerns, including the
decision process used to select the corridor and the handling of the area between your property and
the proposed corridor.
The majority of the land in the City of Orono was held hostage for almost 10 years by the various
corridor alternatives proposed for the upgrade of Highway 12. The decision to use the Burlington
Northern Railroad corridor was not a decision arrived at easily or quickly. It was a solution
developed after years of study and a difficult process by the cities of Long Lake arid Orono and
Mn/DOT to find a solution that would be acceptable to all parties.
The City Council is very c.onscious of, and concerned about, the impact of the Highway on the City's
residents and business owners. The City is working diligently to do everything it can, within the
limits of both the legal process and the political process, to limit the impact of the highway. The
picture is always changing; what may not have been possible in the past, may be possible in the
future. When circumstances change to create a new opportunity to respond to resident concerns and
needs, the City takes advantage of the opportunity.
At the meeting held at Clint Miller’s home, you indicated a strong desire for an earthen berm
between your property and the railroad/highway. At that time, Clint Miller expressed a desire to
remain in his home This situation has now changed, as Mr Miller has indicated he wants his
property to be totally acquired by Mn/DOT. The City has worked with Mn/DOT to change the
preliminary design plan so that Mr. Miller’s property will be totally acquired, and a berm will be
constructed on the Miller property.
Telephone (612) 249-4600 • Fax (612) 249-4616
A k\\ I •> ^
COi IKICIL MEETING
SEP 2 7 t999
Gl IY Ul- UHUNU
Strett Addrm:
2750 Kelley Parimay
Orono, MN 55356
GlTYof ORONO
Munkipal Offices
MaHiai Addrtsa:
P.O. Box 66
Ciystal Bay. MN 55323-0066
September 20,1999
Attn: Shop Committee
c/o WSI Industries
2605 West Wayzata Boulevard
Long Lake, MN 55356
Dear Shop Committee:
This letter is in response to your letter of September 9, 1999 advising the City of the impending
closure of WSI Industries, and requesting the City’s assistance regarding keeping the WSI plant
open. The City received a letter from WSI Industries, on the same day your letter was received,
advising the City that the management of WSI Industries, Inc. has determined to close the WSI
facility. It is very unfortunate for the WSI employees and for the City of Orono that this decision
has been made. The City has considered WSI an asset to the City, as a low-impact industrial facility
providing a large number of well-paying jobs. The City reinforced this to WSI earlier this year
when City officials toured the facility.
The notification regarding the closure came as an unwelcome surprise to the City. However, the
letter made it clear that the decision regarding closure and plans for the closure have already been
made. It does not appear the City could have an impact on the decision at this point.
Sincerely,
Ronald J. Moorse
City Administrator
RJM/lsv
Telephone (612) 249-4600 • Fax (612) 249-4616