HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-13-1999 Council Packetn
Public A ttendance
Meeting Date 7-/i //
1^ C ouncil
~ Planning C ommission
Park C ommission Please hll out the information
REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.
Other
NAME (please print)ADDRESS
PRESENT FOR (from agenda)
NAME OR NUMBER
iJ^(^Vr/\ V/vyv^ithv\\^lK| ^
/ vL<c'
3./cr-M-t ri^rr-^€=:yyf
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MON^AV. SEPTEMBER 13,1999,7:00 P.M.
ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA
(*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one niotion by the City Council
under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the
Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet.
ROLL CALL
RECOGNITION OF MIKE BYRNES
\/ 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Mike Byrnes
CONSENT AGENDA
2. Approve/Amend
AAPPROVAL OF MINUTES
3. Regular Council Meeting of August 23, 1999
'^PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - James V^Tiite, Representative
^PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Jay Nygard, Representative
JPUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
y/" 4. #2492 Rick and Gail Luzaich, 2490 Old Beach Road - Variances and Conditional Use Permit -
Resolution
/ 5. #2511 Douglas and Claudia Whiteley, 60 Orono Orchard Road South - Conditional Use Permit -
Resolution
'f 6. #2512 David Erotas on behalf of Alan and Marilyn Richie, 905 Tonkawa Road - Preliminary Plat -
Resolution
y 7. #2526 Peter Andrea Co., 555 Stubbs Bay Road North - Final Plat of Jacobs Mill - Resolution
J MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT
E^INEER REPORT
Reconsideration of "No Parking" Signs on Shrdywood Road - Resolution
y9. Revise Assessment Roll on Navarre Water Treatment Plant Upgrade
' A. Declare Cost to be Assessed and Order Preparation of Revised Assessment - Resolution
B. Schedule Assessment Hearing - Resolution
)^\0. Change Order #1 and Request for Final Payment - Lift Station #13 Rehabilitation
11. Approve Proposal for County Road 15/51 Traffic Signal Warrant Study
ij#. 12. Joint Powers Agreement with Metro Transit
yj 3. Request Permission to Advertise for Bids for Well #I Repair
:»
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13,1999, 7:00 P.M.
ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA
CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
y 14. Adopt 2000 Tax ’-evy and Budget - Resolutions
Y15. Set Date for Truth in Taxation Hearing
y-16. Set Date for Tax Rate Hearing
^17. Resignation of Kristine Jenson, Assistant Zoning Administrator
•)H8. Appointment of Wendy Bottenberg to Assistant Zoning Administrator Position
19. Public Works Land Acquisition Options
jf20. Patching of Private Donations for Police Squad Mdeo Cameras
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
* 21. LICENSES
* 22. BILLS
0 rcnc f/oc ^
l-h'ple ^c)^rzs‘s _ k'esc/uVcr^
UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS
1999
09/07
09/13
09/20
09/27
10/04
10/11
10/18
10/25
Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m.
Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m.
Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m
Council Meeting, 7.00 p.m.
Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m.
Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m.
Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m.
Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m.
MEETING
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^
ctvohommvq
DATE: September 8, 1999
ITEM NO:/
Department Approval:
Name RonMoorse
Title City Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:
M
Agenda Section:
City Administrator’s
Rqjort
Item Description: Resolution Recognizing Mike Byrnes for his Efforts in Support of the
Community and the Orono Police Department
Mike Byrnes has been a great asset to the community and to the Orono Police Department through
his involvement on the North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition and other community
organizations, and through his position with the State Bank of Long Lake. Attached is a resolution
recognizing Mike Byrnes for his efforts in support of the community and the Orono Police
Department.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to adopt a resolution recognizing Mike Byrnes for his efforts in support of the community
and the Orono Police Department.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO
MIKE BYRNES
FOR ms SUPPORT
OF PUBLIC SAFETY ACTIVITIES
IN THE COMMUNITY
WHEREAS, Mike Byrnes, having been a charter member of the North Tonka Crime
Prevention Coalition since April of 1990, has served as Treasurer from its beginning; and
WHEREAS, Mike has taken an active role in working with crime prevention
through community awareness efforts; and
WHEREAS, the State Bank of Long Lake, through Mike, has provided donations
toward the Safety Camp for Children, National Night Out, and Neighborhood Crime Watch;
and
WHEREAS, Mike was instrumental in obtaining donations for the Orono Police to
make it possible o purchase several defibrillators for emergency treatment of heart attack
victims, "Stop Stix" (tire deflating spikes used in high speed pursuits), as well as officer
ballistic vests; and
WHEREAS, the Long Lake State Bank, through Mike, has provided financial
assistance to the Orono Police Department to aid police officers in furthering their education;
and
WHEREAS, Mike has been a strong advocate for public safety within the
community and has been a great asset to the Orono Police Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orono City Council does
hereby recognize Mike Byrnes for his support of public safety activities in the community,
and does hereby express its appreciation to Mike for his exemplary efforts :n support of the
community and the Orono Police Department.
Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 13 th
day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING^
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999 MEETING
3
ROLL SEP 1 3 1999
CITY U^ Onuivy
The Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor
Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Charles Kelley, Richard Flint, Bob Sansevere, and Barbara
Peterson. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom
Barrett, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Zoning
Administrator/Planner Paul Weinberger and Recorder Lanette Wolf. Mayor Jabbour called the
meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
(#1) CONSENT AGENDA
Items 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, and 13 were added to the Consent Agenda.
Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as
amended. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PRESENTATION BY MARK ENGEBRETSON REGARDING ORONO ICE ARENA
OPERATIONS
Mark Encebretson, representing the Orono Ice Arena Board, stated that the Orono Ice Arena
Association provides an annual report to the School District regarding the operation of the ice
arena. He said the Ice Arena Board would like to provide the Orono City Council with an
annual report. The rink is owned by a Minn.sota non-profit corporation called Orono Ice
Arena, Inc. It is a separate corporation from the youth hockey program. The non-profit
corporation owns and operates the rink. He told the Council that the Ice Arena Board consists
of five members and the City is entitled to appoint a board member, which the City has not
yet done. He urged the Council to exercise its right to have a repre.'entative on the Ice Arena
Board.
Engebretson said the rink has been paid for with private donations. The total project cost will
be approximat !y $3 000,000 and they still need to raise approximately $450,000. On June 1
they kicked off a $475,000 campaign and they have raised $25,000 against it.
Engebretson said the rink is successful from an operating standpoint. They are able to use
some excess operating funds to keep improving the rink.
Engebretson reported that there is an issue with the landscaping. He ap>ologized on behalf of
the rink for the state of the landscaping. He said the rink is located on a difficult site because
it has a variety of topography. It is also a difficult site legally because there is a city-owned
ditch on the Old Crvstal Bay right-of-way, there is an official wetland on the site, and a
detention pond where they are not sure if they can cut the vegetation. He stated that their
landscape engineers recommended planting a prairie mix of wildflowers, but it has not been
successful and it looks like weeds. They have also had some trees die in the area where the
dehumidification units are located. He asked if it would be appropriate for the Council to
Page 1
4
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
PRESENTATION BY MARK ENGEBRETSON REGARDING ORONO ICE ARENA
OPERATIONS • Continued
direct City staff to work with the Ice Arena Board to come up with a landscape plan. He said
there are funds available for landscaping.
Jabbour said the Council is grateful for the ice arena and they would like to help them reach
their financial goal. He asked the Public Services Director to assist the Ice Arena Board to
develop a landscaping plan.
Engebretson said they need help determining which areas they are entitled to cut.
Jabbour asked if the Council members approved of City staff working with the Ice Arena
Board to develop a plan to solve the landscaping problems.
Sansevere, Flint and Peterson said they would support staff working with the Ice Arena
Board.
Flint complimented Mr. Engebretson on his positive attitude regarding the problem. He said
the issue with the grasses is difficult because Orono encourages that type of landscaping.
Eng**bretson said they have concluded that it just didn’t work.
Jabbour suggested they consult the DNR for guidance on the wildflowers.
Kelley said there is a potential problem with a new pond that has been built by the School
District. He does not understand how the new pond works in conjunction with the ditch and
the Ice Arena’s pond. He feels the ponding needs to be reviewed by staff.
Kellogg said he would review the plans for the ponding.
Kelley asked if »he school is planning to sod all the way to the pond.
Kellogg said he believes it was all sod around the perimeter of the pond. He said the cattails
in the pond should not be cut because they provide a safety buffer.
Jabbour said that City staff will work with the Ice Arena Board to provide guidance on the
landscaping issues.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
(*#2) REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 9, 1999
Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council
meeting of August 9, 1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Page 2
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Jim White, Representative
White said that the Orono School District recently notified 140 families, mostly in Navarre,
that their kids will be dropped off the school bus in the parking lot across from the park in
Navarre. There will also be a group dropped off at North Arm Park, He said this is a good
opportunity for the City to do something that would coincide with National Childhood Injury
Prevention Week. He suggested the City put a bike rack at the Navarre park because children
will he biking from all over Navarre.
Kelley asked if children will be crossing County Road 15 at rush hour.
\Miite said they will be crossing County Roads 15 and 19. He said the School District told the
parents that if they came up with $38,000, the School District would add a bus.
Sansevere eisked why the bus was eliminated.
White said these are out-of-district kids and the school is $160,000 short of funds to pay the
busing costs.
Kelley said there has not been very much family involvement with planning of the Navarre
Park. He is not in favor of spending funds on a park where there is no resident participation.
White said the park will be used if it is improved.
Kelley asked if the Park Commission is planning to hold neighborhood meetings regarding the
park.
White said the Park Commission will present the plans to neighborhood residents.
Jabbour said the Council should approve the bike rack.
Sansevere said the Council should try to think of some alternatives beyond that because it will
be dangerous for children to cross County Road 15. He feels it is irresponsible of the School
Board to subject children to potential disaster.
Kelley said the Police Department should be involved with the crossing.
Jabbour said the City cannot absorb the cost that the School District is saving by cutting a
bus. He said that perhaps the Saga Hill children could be dropped off at Fairview Covenant
Church.
White said there are better drop off points than what the School District decided on. He said
the bus company figured it out to their convenience, not the convenience of the children.
Page 3
- - ■
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Continued
Jabbour agreed that this is a public safety issue.
Kelley said that the kids will be wandering through Navane after they are dropped off.
White said that parents made suggestions to the School District for better drop off points, but
the School District said it had already been decided.
Jabbour said that perhaps the Orono and Mound-Westonka school districts should be merged.
Sansevere asked how much time it would take for the bus to drop the kids off the way they
were in the past.
White said ten minutes, five minutes down to Casco Poin* and five minutes back.
White said the Park Commission needs two new members.
Jabbour asked if the Park Commission needs to have seven members or if there could be five
members instead.
White agreed that five members would be adequate.
Jabbour said the City will advertise for volunteers. He stated that there was a very good
meeting with Mn/DOT and Hennepin Parks regarding the Dakota Rail Line. He believes that
the rail line will cease operations on October 15th. He also stated that the City has a tentative
agreement to buy a piece of land from Mr. Larson in Navarre.
Flint said there was a discussion at the Council’s last work session about where the park
dedication fees should go and there was a strong consensus among the City Council members
that the fees should be used for land acquisition and not for capital equipment.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
None
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
Page 4
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
(#3) #2308 BROOK PARK REALTY, 3760 SHORELINE DRIVE - LAKE
MINNETONKA WOODS - FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4333
Bill Gleason, representing Brook Park Realty, was present.
Gaffron presented the staff report. He said this is a request for final plat approval for the Lake
Minnetonka Woods Townhome Development in Navarre which is a 29-unit townhome
development. The DNR has indicated to staff that they will be following up on the potential
restoration of an area that has been filled in over the past 15 or 20 years. The develojjers have
agreed in principle to do whatever restoration work is required. The existing driveway serving
the adjacent Sohns’ property will be partially relocated back onto the Sohns’ site as part of
this development.
Jabbour asked if the developer will grant Sohns an easement for the portion of the driveway
that will not be relocated back onto the Sohns site.
Gieason said yes.
Gaffron said it is a temporary easement that will disappear when the Sohns interest in the
property is eliminated.
Jabbour asked if the DNR would mandate that the driveway be moved in order to restore the
wetland.
Gaffron said if the DNR mandates that the driveway be moved, there will be a question of
how Sohns will gain access to the propert>'.
Jabbour questioned the construction of the road connection to the west.
Gaffron replied that Outlet B is for future road extension to the west and it will not be
developed without Council approval. Funds will be escrowed for the future construction of the
road connection.
Jabbour asked if the cul-de-sac will be needed.
Gaffron said the cul-de-sac would not be needed if it becomes a through-road.
Kelley asked if the landscape plan includes screening if the railroad bed becomes a trail.
Gaffron explained the landscape screening.
Kelley questioned the types of trees that will be used.
Page 5
i
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
(It3) 02308 BROOK PARK REALTY, 3760 SHORELINE DRIVE - ConHnued
Gaffron replied that there will be deciduous trees planted.
Jabbour requested that the applicant inform potential buyers that there may be a trail located
next to the property.
Gleason said there is quite a bit of vegetation along the railroad, but they are not adverse to
adding conifers for additional screening.
Gaffron said that the applicant has requested that building permits be issued prior to road
completion for the two buildings at the northeast comer of the site, one on each side of
Livingston Avenue. These two buildings will be located approximately 75’ from the existing
end of Livingston Avenue, so emergency access should not be an issue. He said staff
recommends approval of the issuance of the permits for these two buildings.
Kelley questioned the need for mud and dust control on Livingston Avenue,
Gaffron said that staff will monitor the situation throughout the project.
Jabbour asked if there could be a temporary easement through the Sohns’ property for access
to the site during constmetion.
Gleason said he would talk'to Sohns about an easement and the mud and dust control will be
discussed with the contractors at a preconstmetion meeting.
Kelley said the applicant may need to rent a street sweeper to keep the street clean.
Gleason said that keeping the street clean is part of the contractors’ bids.
Gaffron said the applicant has suggested he would like to start the site grading. He said staff
would not object to that pending approval by the City Council and receipt of the letter of
credit. He reviewed the punchlist of items that are still pending. The draft title policy was
received tonight about 6:00 p.m. and needs to be reviewed by Mr. Barrett, but it appears to
meet the requirements.
Flint said he did not see a reference for the easement that goes north/south down to County
Road 15 for the trail.
Gaffron said he was not aware there was a requirement for that to be a public trail.
Flint said that in prior discussions, the Council was asked whether it was to be a public trail
and they said yes.
Page 6
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
(»3) M2308 BROOK PARK REALTY^ 3760 SHORELINE DRIVE - Continued
Gaffron said if it is the Council ’s intent that it be a public trail and the developer does not
object, the easement could be incorporated.
Gleason said he did not object.
Gaffron said the subdivider’s bank will not have the letter of credit ready for another week
and the City has not received payment of the required fees for final plat, legal review/filing,
park dedication, or sewer & water. He recommended that any approval granted tonight should
be conditioned on not filing the plat until the City Attorney is satisfied with the title policy
and all other conditions are met.
Jabbour questioned the $53,162 fee for sewer and water.
Gaffron said this property was assessed 30 years ago for sewer and 20 years ago for water as
commercial property. They paid a premium price then and never goi eny of that money back
so they receive a credit. They are being assessed the difference between what they paid for a
number of units in the past and the current number of units under the current ordinance.
Jabbour asked if the City is assessing the developer for the water treatment plant assessment.
Gaffron said he would review the matter because he was not sure if that assessment was
applied to this property because vacant properties were not assessed.
Jabbour explained that an assessment of $350 per home was made for rehabilitation of the
water treatment plant.
Gleason asked if it could be tied to the building permit or if it had to be assessed to the
property.
Gaffron said he believes it was assessed to properties that had a residence structure on them
and was not assessed to vacant properties.
Gleason said he would prefer to pay the fee up front.
Flint referred to the last three paragraphs on page 4 of the prior resolution regarding the
lawsuit and said they should be included in the final approval resolution in case anyone else
tries to use this as a precedent.
Gaffron 'lid he initially put the paragraphs in the draft, but after discussions with the City
Attorney, he look them out.
Jabbour asked Mr. Barrett whether the paragraphs should be included.
Page 7
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
(m m08 BROOK PARK REALTY, 3760 SHORELINE DRIVE - Continued
Barrett said that Flint’s position suggesting that they may be more effective in preventing
arguments from precedent is a good one.
Flint said the purpose is so that if others come to the Council and want a development this
intensive, that the Council can talk about the reasons why this was done the way it was. He
suggested the paragraphs be added.
Gaffron asked if all three paragraphs should be included.
Barrett said the last paragraph is moot.
Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4333 Approving a
Conditional Use Permit for Planned Residential Development and Approving the Plat of
Lake Minnetonka Woods, File No. 2308, subject to the addition of the two whereas
paragraphs that were in the preliminary plat approval, the addition of the public
easement for the north/south trail to County Road 15, the S350 per unit assessment for
the rehabilitation of the water treatment plan, receipt of the letter of credit, payment of
all fees and approval of the title policy by the City Attorney. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Gaffron asked if the Council would authorize staff to issue building permits for the two
buildings nearest existing Livingston Avenue prior to completion of road and utility
improvements, and to likewise authorize commencement of site grading prior to recording of
the plat.
Jabbour said he did not have a problem with it. He asked if staff had a problem with it.
Gaffron said staff did not have a problem with it because both of the buildings are closest to
Livingston Avenue for emergency exit.
Jabbour said if the applicant is willing to work with the City on resolving some of the issues,
the City would work with the applicant. The other Council members agreed.
(#4) #2518 GEORGE W. STICKNEY - MID-US PROPERTIES LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, 250/340 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH - FINAL PLAT
APPROVAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4334
George Stickney, Applicant, was present.
Weinberger presented the staff report. He said the main issue that arose with this subdivision
at the time of preliminary plat approval was some of the concerns for the development just
north of the Luce Line Trail which is owned and operated by the DNR. The City’s storm
water management plan had indicated there should be a change in the culvert size. There is an
existing 36 ” culvert located just north of the Luce Line Trail. The culvert runs underneath the
Page 8
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
(#4) 42518 GEORGE W. STICKNEY - MID-US PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
250/340 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH - Continued
Luce Line Trail, eventually draining downstream through some residential properties located
to the south. The stormwater management plan indicated that this culvert shall be restricted to
an 18 ” drainage control structure. In order for the drainage on the property to work, it
requires some grading along the Luce Line Trail. Restricting the flows from a 36 ” drainage
sti licture to 18 ” would actually raise the water level located within the wetland just north of
the Luce Line. The developer has agreed to do some regrading and do some filling along the
horse trail to raise the horse trail above what would be the flood level in that area.
Weinberger said that another issue that came up at the time of preliminary plat was
responsibility regarding the maintenance and eventual construction of the new drainage
structure. Mr. Stickney, as the subdivider, is responsible for the replacement of the drainage
str .‘lure and the replacement of the culvert underneath the Luce Line Trail. The overall and
long-term maintenance of the portion of the culvert located within the Crystal Bay Preserve
and drainage structure will be handled by the homeowners association of Crystal Bay
Preserve. The DNR will maintain the portion of the culvert that runs underneath the Luce
Line Trail.
Weinberger said that another issue was the grading on the property. The grading for the road
was begun, but was stopped because the grading permit was not received from the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District. The Watershed District discussed the application at their meeting on
August 12th and it will be on their agenda for final approval on August 26th. Mr. Hafner with
the Watershed District has indicated the application wilt receive a favorable recommendation
from the Watershed District, but it is a condition of the plat that the City will not release the
subdivision for filing until the permit has been received from the Watershed District.
Kelley said he does not understand the drainage system because of the size and depth of the
pond.
Stickney said it is not finish graded at this point.
Kellogg said the pond was designed to meet NURP standards.
Jabbour asked who designed the pond.
Stickney replied that Mark Gronberg, the DNR, the Watershed District and Tom Kellogg have
reviewed the plans for the pond. He said it has been engineered to take care of a lot of
problems downstream for years to come.
Kellogg stated the purpose of the pond is to treat the drainage coming off the hardcover.
Kelley said that the way the road is currently graded, the water will not drain into the pond.
Page 9
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
(tf4) ff2518 GEORGE W. STICKNEY - MID-US PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
250/340 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH - Continued
Stickney replied that he had to stop the grading before it was completed.
Kellogg said the depth of the pond would be eight feet.
Flint asked how safety is handled in the pond.
Stickney said the pond will have a gradual slope.
Kellogg said there should be a 3 to 1 slope outside the ponding area. There should be a 10 to
1 bench, which means for every 10 feet horizontally, it falls 1 foot vertically around the
perimeter of the pond. This bench keeps the water shallow, promotes the growth of aquatic
vegetation and provides a natural barrier to the water.
Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4334, Approving the Plat of
Crystal Bay Preserve, File No. 2518, and to approve the naming of the private road to
be developed within Outlot A as Deer Run Trail East.
Jabbour asked if staff wanted to include any conditions of approval.
Weinberger replied that the conditions are listed in the resolution.
Kelley questioned the location of the building envelope for Lot 3. He asked if the Watershed
District would allow a driveway to cross the drainage area.
Stickney said they will allow it if he keeps a 36 ” culvert there.
VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#5) #2506 EDWARD H. HAMM, 485 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4335
Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4335 Granting a
Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3(G), File
#2506, 485 Orono Orchard Road South. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#6) #2508 JAMES ERLER, 3448 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE -
RESOLUTION NO. 4336
Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4336 Granting a Variance
to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) File No. 2508, 3448 North
Shore Drive. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Page 10
i
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
(*#7) #2509 ANDREW RONNINGEN, 3030 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES -
RESOLUTION NO. 4337
Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4337 Granting a Variance
to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B), File No. 2509, 3030 Casco
Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#8) #2515 TOM AND MAUREEN PALM, 1685 CONCORDIA STREET -
VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4338
Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4338 Granting Variances
to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.03, Subdivision
14(C), File No. 2515, 1685 Concordia Street. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#9) #2517 SCOTT AND LISA BITTMAN, 25 BROWN ROAD SOUTH • VARIANCES
- RESOLUTION NO. 4339
Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4339 Grantiug a Variance
to Municipal Zoning Code, Section 10.28, Subdivision 5(B), File No. 2517, 25 Brown
Road South. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#14) EXTENSION OF SEWER SERVICE TO 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE -
RESOLUTION NO. 4341
Martha Head, Applicant, was present.
Head stated the only issue she has is ♦hat the ownership of the property is actually in her
husband’s and his sister’s names.
Moorse stated that a revised resolution was prepared correcting the first Whereas clause to
show that the property is owned by Douglas Head and Sally Bosanko. He said there is also
an Exhibit A which is a legal description of the property.
Barrett requested that if the Council adopts the resolution, that number 1 in the resolution be
amended to read that the deed covenant be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. He
asked if Mrs. Head had any objection to that.
Mrs. Head replied that she had no objection.
Peterson moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4341 Regarding the
Extension of Municipal Sanitary Sewer Service to the Head Property at 2090 Shoreline
Drive with the correction to the legal name of the owners of the land, the deed covenant
will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, and the legal description of the land
will be part of the resolution. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Page II
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
(ffI4) EXTENSION OF SEWER SERVICE TO 2090 SHORELINE DRIVE - ConHnued
Jabbour stated the Heads made the request to extend sewer service to their property. There are
four other houses between them and the lift station that do not intend to connect to the City’s
sewer service. Based on the discussion regarding the Fox Ridge sewer service, there was a
potential change in the City’s assessment policy. If the line will potentially service other
homes, funds could be banked for future connections to reduce the per-unit costs. Jabbour said
he is not in favor of changing the policy at this time, but if the policy is changed, the amount
charged the Heads should be reviewed.
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT
Jabbour stated that he and Jim Murphy met with Tom O'Keefe, the preliminary design
engineer for the Highway 12 project. There may be a new design engineer for the final design
phase. They suggested to Mr. O’Keefe that the design engineer for the final design phase |
should work with him now so he becomes familiar with the people and issues involved in the |
project. Mr. O’Keefe agreed this would be a good idea. The preliminary design has been i
presented to the City. ^ '
Jabbour reported that he and Mr. Flint met with Hennepin Parks and Peter Johnson of
Mn/DOT to gain a better understanding of what might happen with the railroad. They tried to
make sure that the City’s and Mn/DOT’s objectives are the same.
Flint said that Mn/DOT would prefer to keep the railroad going. If they can’t keep the
railroad going, their preference is to preserve the right-of-way. The establishment of a trail is
one of the well-accepted ways of preserving right-of-way. They also indicated they will
require a lot of safety features if the railroad track is upgraded.
Jabbour recognized Mike Byrnes from the Long Lake State Bank for his contribution to
public safety. Jabbour said he received a call from Warren Bielke who said he wanted to
make sure that all of the police cars have defibrillators and all the officers have updated bullet
proof vests. Jabbour talked with the Chief of Police who said there is a need for a video
camera to be used in the squad cars. Mayor Jabbour indicated that he will be donating one
camera and Mr. Bielke will donate a second one.
Jabbour said that Van Erickson told him that the Girls Softball Association has been allocated
a field in the school district. The school district will pick up 80-85% of the cost and they are
looking for a contribution from the City. He told Mr. Erickson that the City’s policy has been
to not make this type of contribution, but he would bring it up to the Council.
Sansevere said he is planning a fund raiser for the hockey team in September.
Jabbour said if the Council ever decides to make this type contribution, there must be a
budget, people should compete for the funds with criteria to be met and other cities should
Page 12
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ~ Continued
match the funds. He said there should be a fund set up and the public should be able to
contribute to it.
Sansevere stated that on behalf of the Orono residents in Navarre and Saga Hill, a letter
should be sent to the school board formally asking them to reconsider their decision to reduce
their bus service for the open enrollment children.
Flint said he feels it is a safety issue and he would like input from the Police Department.
Jabbour said there are more cars on County Road 15 than on Highway 12 and that this is a
safety issue. He thinks the Police Department should be briefed on the school’s plans.
Jabbour suggested that this matter be added to the agenda for the Council’s Thursday meeting.
Kelley referred to a matter considered at the last Council meeting where the Council gave
approval to a project at 6th Avenue North and Willow. He objects to the action taken by the
Council and he wants the rezoning and the site plan handled separately with the rezoning
considered first. He doesn’t feel that the citizens have had adequate notice and a chance for
input.
Flint disagreed, saying he wants to see the site plan along with the rezoning application.
He would not vote to rezone the property without seeing what would be going on the
property.
Jabbour indicated the he agrees the Council’s decision processes need to be open. Any
rezoning application will require a public hearing. Jabbour asked Gaffron if there would be a
sign posted informing the public that the property will be considered for rezoning.
Gaffron said that a sign will be posted and property owners within 350 feet will be notified.
Jabbour asked if a rezoning requires a four/fifths vote.
Gaffron agreed that it would require a four/fifths vote.
Jabbour said this is a result of the Council’s delay in amending the comprehensive plan. He
agreed that the Council should not be application driven.
Peterson said she was in favor of looking at it, not that she was in favor of rezoning the
property.
Page 13
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
ENGINEER REPORT
(#10) RECEIVE REPORT AND SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING RE: FULLERTON
SUBDIVISION SEWER
Flint asked if there are units available for this sewer project.
Kellogg said yes and no.
Jabbour talked about a number of projects where there may be a request to connect to the
sewer system. He feels the City should revisit its policy on allowing homes to connect to the
sewer system and whether the City should subsidize petition projects.
Flint said this petition has been signed by four of the seven property owners. He feels the
City should wait until more of the property owners want to connect to the sewer system.
Moorse said staff has not been sure what percentage of property owners the Council would
like to have on the petition. He said they have been banking units in various projects.
Jabbour said this project would be 50%.
Kellogg said one of the property owners has a new system, so the best they could do would
be six out of seven property owners.
Flint said that he is not in favor of this project until there are more than four out of seven of
the property owners that will sign the petition.
(#11) STUBBS BAY CUL-DE-SAC REJECT BIDS AND AUTHORIZE
READVERTISING FOR BIDS
Flint said he is bothered because the bids are out and everyone has seen everyone else’s bid.
Now, the project is being rebid. He thought in the past the City had negotiated with the low
bidder when there is something that will increase the cost.
Kellogg said that this is a State Aid job funded by the State. There are special provisions that
are required in the specifications above and beyond what the City normally does for a sewer
project. In this case, the specifications were put together and the prevailing wages comments
were put into the text form of the specifications, but the State also requires you to insert the
current actual rates in the specifications. In this case, they were not included. There has been
that discussion with the contractor, but the response from the contractor was that he did not
include that in his bid so there would have to be negotiations for more money. The State
ordered that all the bids be rejected, so the project has to be rebid.
Flint asked if the project can be completed this year if it is rebid.
Page 14
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
(ttll) STUBBS BAY CUL-DE-SAC REJECT BIDS AND AUTHORIZE READVERTISING
FOR BIDS - Continued
JCellogg said it can be completed this year if the Council gives its approval to rebid the
project tonight.
Flint moved, Kelley seconded, to reject bids for the Mn/DOT Cooperative Agreement
project for the closure of the TH12/Stubbs Bay Road intersection. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays
0.
Flint moved, Kelley seconded, to authorize advertising for bids for the Mn/DOT
Cooperative Agreement project for the closure of the TH12/Stubbs Bay Road
intersection. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(#11 A) APPROVE EASEMENTS STUBBS BAY ROAD CUL-DE-SAC
Moorse stated that two easements are required to construct the Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-Sac.
Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to authorize payment of $1,200 to Kevin & Diane
Holmes for an easement to construct the Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-Sac.
Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to authorize payment of $1,050 to Robert & Summer
Taylor for an easement to construct the Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-Sac.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
(*#12) ADVERTISE FOR VACANCY ON PARK COMMISSION
Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to authorize staff to place a news release in the local
newspapers announcing the Park Commission vacancy. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#13) RECONVEYANCE OF TAX FORFEIT PARCEL - RESOLUTION NO. 4340
Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4340 reconveying the tax
forfeit parcel with PID #35-118-23 41 0010 to the State of Minnesota for acquisition by
the DNR. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Page 15
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR AUGUST 23, 1999
(*#15) LICENSES
Sansevere moved, Kelley secocded, a motion to approve the following licenses:
Special Event Permit
Applicant: Richard Carlson
Parade of Homes in Minnetonka Beach
Operate a shuttle service at Navarre Parking Lot
September 11, 1999 to October 3, 1999
12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Event:
Location:
Date:
Time:
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#16) BILLS
Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
None.
ADJOURNMENT
Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:55 p.m.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Page 16
* sig-s■S £■g I OJ S IS^clci s||,li|g§i^ (2 o: Q ce:Q ri 85ll.*2 o ^ S 8 «*? O o>O oi 044^ ri t-VJ Vi/ll.i si. ^11 o ^^ W Qm o ^ |2 tliSblil ^ H *2 8 I |H « Sc h 6 J5 s i »Oi- g ^ <8■g>> Src*2cd:> SiSo^gg-g^JoaoSaJOc^ 5 " " — *-v-«aJ3S>^Cco — ri fo ^1.--oc,9^”*7aSioC3 c ^ -2i 5b JC ^ o c t> *3 o .aSI Hills I#yCjJ 00O^«i _P5 o .J2 5 i; *-• yjjju> ^9*5cr J5y^o2<cQU<»8^ 5C! Up U.So S <s g-QQ< C/J V)«A» VO■H _■ r—• 1 —4 o olS’5-1s ^_ o C» !2 O o C5 cnag•2 4? Q :5 -o SJU-. o ^O *a to ^S 6-c OIt? I55 0.2 « 0-2 J2 o: < £ :Sr^ 00 O' o •a 0.5 d- B 0.5* d.isgslsgsr** •§ f^ t^ ‘go ^ 8 gji'l ^ilililii^ 1 *i 1 ^ 1 i 1'Sjli'SiliOiUp«UfluU£o• ••••III^fnor*5p-*oo«n?CCJC!5CcrC!SZjS^aS^oooo
L _A MIt •*-* \
Application Date:
Completion Date:
Deadline Date:
MEETING
SfP I 5 1999
April 21« 1999
April 21,1999
October 18,1999
CITY u^ unuivu
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: 9/9/99
ITEM NO , V
Department Approval:
Name Paul Weinberger
Title Zoning Administrator/Planner
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2492 Rick and Gail Luzaich
2490 Old Beach Road
Variances and Conditional Use Permit
Zoning District: LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre)
Lot Area:55,215 square feet (1.27 acre)
Attachments
A Resolution
B City Forestry Consultant Recommendation - Peter Bedker PhD. (August 19,1999)
C Revised Restoration Plan - (August 19,1999)
D1-D4 Hardcover Calculation Worksheets
E Bedker PhD. Site Analysis Report - (June 16,1999)
BedkerPhD.-(July 15,1999)
Bedker PhD. - (July 25,1999)
Tree Removal Survey
Previous Restoration Plan (July 21,1999) Review by Council
Planning Commission Minutes (May 17,1999)
Planning Commission Minutes (June 21,1999)
City Council Minutes (July 12,1999)
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
Summary: A revised restoration plan (please refer to Exhibit C), dated August 19,1999, has been
reviewed by Peter Bedker, PhD. In his comments (Exhibit B), dated August 19, 1999, he has
recommended the restoration plan be adopted by the City. The plan has removed two trees that were
located near the far property lines and relocated them closer to the center of the property. This plan
has not eliminated any trees that did sqipear on a previous plan, however it has increased the spacing
and will achieve 90% canopy coverage within the 25 year restoration period as recommended by Dr.
Bedker.
J
2" average diameter trees will be planted in the locations indicated on the most revised restoration
plan. Dr. Bedker has indicated this size tree will likely be successful in achieving stability within
two years of planting. Restoration of the site shall begin no later than Spring, 2000. The City
Attorney has recommended executing a contract or Restoration Agreement with the property owners
giving the City rights to inspect the property following restoration planting and annual site
inspections for a period of 6-8 years. The purpose of the site inspections is to ensure a successful
restoration program and ensure the bluff is not subject to any erosion problems.
Hardcover and Shoreland Land Alteration
The original landscaping plan submitted by the applicants had indicated a series of retaining walls
and extensive land alteration. Based on recommendations by the City Engineer and Planning
Commission the retaining walls and land alteration were mostly eliminated from the plan. The only
hardcover and grading would occur at the base of the proposed stairway. However it would be
located within 75' of the lakeshore requiring a variance for hardcover and a conditional use permit
for grading. The amount of hardcover and grading is minimal and only enough to stabilize the base
of the stairway.
A summary of the existing and proposed hardcover on the lot are attached to this memo as Exhibits
D1-D4. The additional hardcover within 75 ’ of the lake are a result of 50 s.f for the retaining walls.
The Shoreland Ordinance allows stairways as a preferred alternative to major topographic alterations
for achieving access up and down bluffs and steep slopes to shore areas. The applicants have
proposed a stairway 5' wide, however the Ordinance only allows stairways 4' in width. Staff is
recommending the proposed stairway be reduced 1' to comply with the ordinance and decrease
potential hardcover on the property.
This application requires the following variances:
1.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. i6 (L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover and
Land Alteration Regulations: Within 75 feet of the shoreline (929.4') there shall be no
excavating, filling, hardcover, temporary or permanent structures. Within 75 to 250 feet of
the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. Within 250 to 500 feet of the
shoreline there shall be no greater than 30% hardcover. The proposed plan would increase
the amount of hardcover in the 0-75' setback from 60 s.f. (0.5%) to 200 s.f. (1.5%) to allow
a series of retain walls along the bluff. The amount of hardcover would also slightly increase
within the 75-250' setback. No variance is required as the total hardcover would be 24.4%.
This application requires the following Conditional Use Permit:
1.Section 10.03, Subdivision 19: A Conditional Use Permit is required to allow the grading
and placement of retaining walls within the lakeshore setback. Vegetation must be made
available to adequately screen structures, including buildings and retaining walls, from public
waters. The proposal would slightly modify the natural grade within the 75' lakeshore
setback, requiring a Conditional Use Permit.
Pertinent Ordinances
1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 3 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (I) (1): Tree Removal
Regulations: No live tree within 75 feet of the shoreline with a diameter of six inches or
more shall be removed without first obtaining a permit from the City. Such permits shall be
issued by the City staff provided that at least a like number of replacement trees of a size and
naUire found acceptable to the staff are planted, any question involving the number of trees
to be replaced will require approval.
2.Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (I) (2): Intensive Vegetation Clearing: Intensive vegetation
clearing within 75 feet of the shoreline and on steep slopes within the Shoreland Overlay
District is prohibited. Limited clearing of shrubs and trees less than 6 inches in diameter and
cutting, pruning and trimming of trees of any size is allowed to provide a view to the water
from the principal dwelling site and to accommodate the placement of permitted stairways
and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraft acces.' areas, and permitted
lock boxes, provided that the screening of structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed
from the water, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions, is not substantially reduced.
Issues for Discussion
1.The vegetation proposed is consistent with the types that were removed without obtaining
a permit and are compatible with the vegetation on surrounding properties. The Code
states no live tree within 75 feet of the shoreline with a diameter of six inches or more
shall be removed without first obtaining a permit from the City. A requirement of the
permit is at least a like number of replacement trees of a size and nature found acceptable
to the Staff, Planning Commission and City Council be planted.
2.The landscape plan has addressed tree replacement criteria as described in the attached
recommendations by Dr. Bedker.
3.The majority of the plantings within the slope are smaller shrub style plantings. A few
mature trees have been placed near the center of the property to screen the residence firom
public water view.
4.The applicants have provided revised hardcover calculations for the 75-250' lakeshore
setback and the 250-500' lakeshore setback that demonstrate no variances are required
within the two setback zones.
Staff Recommendation
To approve variances and a conditional use permit based on the following conditions:
1.Property owners and City of Orono enter into a Restoration Agreement allowing Staff to
enter the property and conduct an initial inspection following restoration planting and
additional annual inspections for six consecutive years following restoration. The
purpose of the site inspections is to ensure a successful restoration program and ensure
the bluff is not subject to any erosion problems.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Property owners apply for a land aUeration permit and building permit for the
construction of the stairway, retaining walls and grading on the property.
Any amendments to the restoration plan may require further Planning Commission and
City Council review.
The trees shall be planted to the size and types indicated on the most revised site plan,
dated August 19, 1999.
Tree restoration shall be complete no later than June 15,2000.
Erosion control measures shall remain in place until restoration is complete and Staff
authorizes removal.
The Agreement shall continue with the property upon any future sale while subject to the
Restoration Agreement.
8. The applicant reduces the width of the proposed stairway jfrom 5' to 4'.
A
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES PER
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2
AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (D AND
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19
FILE NO. 2492
WHEREAS, Rick and Gail Luzaich (hereinafter the "applicants") are owners of
a property located at 2490 Old Beach Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City"); and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Miimesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning
Commission held public hearings on May 17, 1999 and June 21, 1999, at which times all persons
desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit a
retaining wall to stabilize a stairway located on a steep slope for the purposes of lake access within
the 0-75' lakeshore setback to allow 210 s.f. (1.5%) hardcover where 60 s.f. (0.5%) exists and
none (0%) is allowed; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a conditional use permit to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to allow grading and construction of a
retaining wall within 75' of the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of Lake Minnetonka.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2492.
2.The Comprehensive Plan addresses the issue of maintaining a natural appearance
along lakeshore properties. The Plan states minimum green belts will be provided
with prohibitations against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural
Page 1 of 7
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
vegetation will be preserved on slopes. Retaining walls will be discouraged except
when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened
with natural vegetation.
The City of Orono Staff was notified of extensive tree removal had occurred on the
property without obtaining a permit, and a stop work order was issued to the
property owners.
A total of approximately 17 trees of greater than 6" in diameter had been removed
from the property within the 75' lakeshore setback area and on a steep slope. The
Orono Zoning Code stales no live tree within 75 feet of the shoreline with a diameter
of six inches or more shall be removed without first obtaining a permit from the City.
Such permits shall be issued by the City staff provided that at least a like number of
replacement trees of a size and nature found acceptable to the staff are planted, any
question involving the number of trees to be replaced will require approval.
Intensive vegetation clearing within 75 feet of the shoreline and on steep slopes
within the Shoreland Overlay District is prohibited. Limited clearing of shrubs and
trees less than 6 inches in diameter and cutting, pruning and trimming of trees of any
size is allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling site and to
Hi commodate the placement of permitted stairways and landings, picnic areas, access
paths, beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted lock boxes, provided that the
screening of structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed from the water,
assuming summer, leaf-on conditions, is not substantially reduced.
The property was clearcut leaving no natural appearance to the shoreland area and
it is the position of the Council the conditions on the property resulted in the visual
appearance of the property had been more than substantially reduced.
The City of Orono retained Peter Bedker, PhD., a consulting forester, to review
the property and recommend parameters for restoration of the site. His
reconunendations were:
A. The value of the trees removed is estimated at $48,100 using standardized
appraisal methods.
Page 2 of 7
L
8.
9.
10.
11.
B 29 trees of 2-inch caliper (maples and lindens with a few red oaks) on a 25'
average spacing would replace the 14,450 s.f. lost canopy in a period of 20-
25 years. Spacing should be staggered to provide a natural appearance.
C.Larger trees could be placed at the top of tlie slope to soften and obscure
the roofline of the existing residence as viewed from the lake.
D.The majority of the existing stumps and root systems should remain in place
to stabilize the slope.
E. Planting with the slopes must be done in a manner to avoid soil disturbance
A small amount of grading will occur at the base of the stairway to stabilize the
retaining walls and stairway.
Stairways are permitted within the shore setback zone to allow easier access to the
lakeshore along steep slopes and bluffs. The proposed stairway as shown in the
plan is 5 feet in width, however the maximum width allowed by code is 4 feet. No
hardship has been demonstrated that would allow a stairway to exceed 4 feel in
width.
The property owners and City will enter into a Restoration Agreement that will
ensure successful vegetation restoration to the property and protect the slope from
erosion.
The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and
do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the
variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire
hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship
or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant;
and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
12. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow a retaining
Page 3 of 7
wall and grading within the 75' lakeshore setback will not be detrimental to the
health, safety or genera! welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air
nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will its use
depreciate surrounding prop>erty values and that the proposed level of use of the
property will be in keeping w ith the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
13. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by
the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56,
Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit a retaining wall to stabilize a stairway located on a steep slope
for the purposes of lake access within the 0-75' lakeshore setback to allow 210 s.f. (1.5%)
hardcover where 60 s.f. (0.5%) exists and none (0%) is allowed and grants a conditional use
permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to allow grading and
construction of a retaining wall within 75' of the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of Lake
Minnetonka. Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1.Property owners and City of Orono enter into a Restoration Agreement as drafted by
the City Attorney and agreed to by the property owners allowing Staff to enter the
property and conduct an initial inspection following restoration planting and
additional annual inspections for six consecutive years following restoration. The
purpose of the site inspections is to ensure a successful restoration program and
ensure the bluff is not subject to any erosion problems.
Property owners apply for a land alteration permit and building permit for the
construction of the stairway, retaining walls and grading on the property.
3.Any amendments to the restoration plan may require further Planning Commission
and City Council review.
Page 4 of 7
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The trees shall be planted to the size and types indicated on the most revised site
plan, dated August 19,1999.
Tree restoration shall be complete no later than June 15,2000.
Erosion control measures shall remain in place until restoration is complete and Staff
authorizes removal.
The Agreement shall continue with the property upon any future sale while subject
to the Restoration Agreement.
The applicant reduces the width of the proposed stairway from 5' to 4'.
Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but
are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit
within one year of the date of Council's approval, or the special conditions of this
resolution will expire on that date (September 13, 2(XX)).
10. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
11. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of
this resolution and on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to
the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Page 5 of 7
• I
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Property Owners
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of
September, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 6 of 7
• From* Peter J Bedker To Paul Weinberger Date 8/19/99 Time 10 07 38 AM Page 2 of
Treescapesm(^■numutnr- l'iin‘>;ti«y ConsultaiitH
12 M TI)!!«1 \\cinu' \E
Butililo MinnctiotJ >>313
(612) 682-9362
Voice ft Ftx
August 19.1999
Paul Weinberger
City of Orono
2750 Kelly Parkway
Orono. MN 55356
RE: Review of Revised (8/1^/99) Planting Plan for R. Luzaich Residence
2490 Old Beach Road, Orono, MN
Application #2492
Dear Mr. Weinberger:
Yesterday Mr. Mueller ana l had a phore conversation regarding changes needed to his plariting plan for
the R. Luzaich residence at 2490 Old Beach Road for it to represent a full restoration plan under the
guidelines that outlined in my report to you of June 16.1999 and my letter to Mr. Mueller of July 15,1999. I
told him that the only remaining concern that I had was that his proposed plan with trees in their current
locations only would restore 82% of the estimated tree canopy that was removed within the 25 year
restoration period
In addition. I suggested that by taking r.vo trees that were largely redundant in the proposed plan because
the contributed very little additional carcpy cover and move them out toward the center of the property that
approximately 90% canopy restoration could be achieved. This morning Mr. Mueller faxed me a revised
planting plan with tflese suggested changes.
As a result I am willing to recommend to you without hesitation, that this planting plan be adopted as a full
restoration plan under the guidemes that I set forth in the above referenced letters to you and Mr. Mueller.
Please give me a call if you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance.
S\i y.
Peter J. BWker. Pn D
Consulting Community Forester
CC: Gary Mueller
Plant Heullh C ure \l.ir.;ii.vii.o;'l:cv V.iiuii!en'<cnt I'lai.s B I ree Imcntones Hazard Tree Assessments
«ffO-CCi ({1*1
HU ’fllMOiaM SAOHO MaANI
OA*IQ Aa'f'lVA M3UI UC0
fvaNNv'td aii€ / «i3aiiM3irv adv?«a>4vi
S31VI00SSV NVldONVl
r««uui^/^ •icyt SMI JO
lMO| OMi^OPUT^|9»|it(0JV
•dooobwoq pojoioiSoj
A|np o ujo I logi puo
uoi«iAjodn« loojip
Auj jopun JO oui Xq
pojodojd «OM uo|d «igi
lOUi XjiiJoa Xqojog i
• vf %ii !GOV / '"ivY|
66nO//i| tiO £N!Niy-j*. Ji-aTaci
i
1
!F<aisAS
i6/0C/5j r<s asviibai aianaoj
•lOQ Ag ‘•5uolio I ON
VUOiPjAP^
fix
Xq uMOJO
66 9C'«
•lOQ
oaooos aa “hvhs 'oaHOinh ion svadv ONUNvid ONiMonoa
oaooadHs hum oaMDinw aa nvHS svadv ONiiNvid inv
Noiivdadadd oag ONUNvnd dOd iNaioiddns ^dOMHidva
aovdo ONiisixa hum Hsmd oaAowad onv mo aa ox sdiNfus tiv
NOiiondiSNOD aii6 dOd aiNa^adinoad nvoon hum xidv^oo nnvHS
GdlVlS ONV Sdaie dOd SNOlSNair^lQ SlINn XdNOSVIN .aNoiGxax. dO
oaiondiSNOO aa iivhs iNaisxs xvMdivis oaeodOdd
Dl
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Rick and Gail Luzaich Property
2490 Old Beach Road
Orono, Minnesota 55391
Revised August 19,1999
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Set Back Zone...................................
A Concrete Masonry Unit Stairway
0’ - 75’
1.5 Ftx40 Ft 60 Sq Ft
A
B
Total Hardcover in Zone
Total Property in Zone
Computer Measured
Computer Measured
60 Sq Ft
13,690 Sq Ft
Percent
Percent Desired
0^
0
Set Back Zone....................................................................................................... 75* - 250 ’
A Concrete Masonry Unit Stairway 1.5 Ftx40 Ft
A House/ Garage Computer Measured
A Concrete Walk/Porch Computer Measured
A Concrete Patio Computer Measured
A Concrete Driveway/Curb Computer Measured
A Rock Mulch Planting Beds Computer Measured
A Total Hardcover in Zone Computer Measured
B Total Property in Zone Computer Measured
Percent
Percent Desired
60 Sq Ft
4,795 Sq Ft
400 Sq Ft
655 Sq Ft
2,130 Sq Ft
\ 2,415 Sq Ft]
10,455 SqFt
33,510 Sq Ft
31 2*19*
25 Maximum
r~
0
Pa
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Rick and Gail Luzaich Property
2490 Old Beach Road
Orono, Minnesota 55391
Revised Augxist 19,1999
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Set Back Zone .................................
Page 2 of 2
A Sport Court/Retaining Walls 35 Ft X 65 Ft Court 2,415 Sq Ft
A Concrete Driveway/Curb Computer Measured 2,565 Sq Ft
A Rock Mulch Planting Beds Computer Measured 1,000 Sq Ft
A Total Hardcover in Zone Computer Measured 5,980 Sq Ft
B Total Property in Zone Computer Measured 39,385 Sq Ft
Percent
Percent Desired
15
30 Maximum
\ ‘
03
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Rick and Gail Luzaich Property
2490 Old Beach Road
Orono, Minnesota 55391
Revised August 19,1999
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
0’ - 75’
A Concrete Stairway 5 Ft X 40 Ft 200 Sq Ft
A CMU Retaining Wall 50 Lin Ft 50 Sq Ft
A Total Hardcover in Zone Computer Measured 250 Sq Ft
B Total Property in Zone Computer Measured 13,690 Sq Ft
Percent 2
r
Percent Change 1.5 Increase
Raok 7.AffiP _ ________ _____________
•
... 75’-250*
A Concrete Stairway 5Ftx40Ft 200 Sq Ft
A House/ Garage Computer Measured 4,795 Sq Ft
A Concrete Walk/Porch Computer Measured 400 Sq Ft
A Concrete Patio Computer Measured 655 Sq Ft
A Concrete Driveway/Curb Computer Measured 2,130 Sq Ft
A Rock Mulch Planting Beds Computer Measured (^^ssalsl
A Total Hardcover in Zone Computer Measured 10,595 Sq Ft
B Total Property in Zone Computer Measured 33,510 Sq Ft
Percent
Percent Change 1.0 Increase
i
i
J
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Rick and Gail Luzaich Property
2490 Old Beach Road
Orono, Minnesota 55391
Revised August 19,1999
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
•Page 2 of2
C a# _ _ ______________...............250' - 500'
A Sport Court/Retaining Walls 35 Ftx65 Ft Court 2,415 Sq Ft
A Concrete Driveway/Curb Computer Measured
%
2,565 Sq Ft
A Rock Mulch Planting Beds Computer Measured 1,000 Sq Ft
A Total Hardcover in Zone Computer Measured 5,980 Sq Ft
B Total Property in Zone Computer Measured 39,385 Sq Ft
Percent 15
Percent Change 0
I
1
r
• From- Pater J Beaker To' Mike Gaffron Date 6/17/dd Time 1123 00 AM Page 2 of 5
TREliSCAPES
Ooituimmty Foreetry CZoneuiUints
1214 Tliird Avenue NE
Buflalo, Minnesota 35313
(6l2)6S2-y562
Voice & la\
DATE:
TO:
June 16,1999
Paul Weinberger
Assistant Zoning Administrator
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
FROM Peter J. Bedker.Ph.D.
Consulting Community Forester
RE:Luzaich Restoration Plan Parameters
2490 Old Beach Road
Application #2492
The following are parameters that should be used to design and evaluate restoration plans for the Luzaich
residence at 2490 Old Beach Road. They were prepared to maet your stated desire objectives to restore
the lakeshore to wooded, natural appearing landscape in as short of time as possible. These parameters
were developed at your request and are based on on-site observations and measurements made June 9,
1999 and June 14,1999.
Observations and Background
The April 19.1999 survey (Coffin & Gronberg. Inc) of the property identified a total of 16 trees with stump
diameters of 12 inches or greater that were renxived from the rear (lake side) of the residence On-site
investigations identified an American linden stump (21 inch diameter) located 32.5 feet northeast of the
northeast corner of the Luzaich residence that was not indicated on the survey. Species composition of
canopy trees was as follows; 47% sugar maple {Acer saccharum), 47% American linden (77///a americana)
and 6% northern red oak {Ouercus rubra). Understory trees included sapling and seedlings of these
species as well as ironwood (Ostrya wrginiana) and American elm [Ulmus americana).
The trees removed were a remnant of a mature sugar maple • basswood forest The height of remaining
' trees on adjacent properties to the are 80 to 85 feet
Tree diameters at 4.5 feet above the ground (DBH) were estimated based on measurements of stump
height and diameters. An estimated 6,950 in’ of cross-sectional area of trees were removed. The total
value of the trees removed was estimated to be $48,100 using methods established by the Council of
Landscape Appraisers (1992) and the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture Plant Appraisal Committee
Plant Hca UI i Care Manugemetu ■ Tree Management Plans ■ Tree Inventories ■ Hazard Tree Assessments
i.
From Peter J Bedker To Mike Gaffron Date 6/17/99 Time 11 23 00 AM P.age 3 of 5
Mr. Weinberger - June 16,1999
Page 2
(Simons 1996, Simons 1999). Since the trees were missing, average values (70%) were used for
condition, contiibution and placement with the exception of Tree 14. This tree had extensive decay in the
stump therefore the tree had no value. Table 1 presents species, stump height, sturrp diameter, estimated
DBH and estimated value for each of the significant canopy trees.
The total area of canopy removed is estimated to be 14,450 ft^. This estimate is based on the following
average crown diameters;
American linden
Red oak
Sugar maple
50 feet
50 feet
40 feet
This area represents the union of crowns with the above diameters centered over their stump locations.
The trees were located on a northeastern slope facing the lake. The steepest part of the slope represents
an 18 foot vertical change of grade and ranges from 27 percent to 60 percent from west to east. In a few
locations, equipment ruts were left during tree removal and the ruts have begun to erode. This slope also
creates issues of access and limits the type of equipment that may be used on site. In addition, the access
from the front yard to the back is only 10 feet wide.
Comments
1. It is my opinion that ttie circumstances of the unauthorized removal of trees dictates that the restoration
plan be consistent with the ‘Reasonable and Practical Replacement Cosr method of plant appraisal
(Council of Landscape Appra<sers 1992). This method establishes the appraised damages are the
‘cost to replace the number, size and species of trees destroyed to the extent that: 1) replacement
serves to substantially restore the cnaracior and quality of the property ... and 2) the cost of
replacement is not greatly disproportionate to the resulting restoration...’
2. It is not reasonable or practical to transplant large trees as part of this restoration. The alternative is to
establish a approximate time frame for the restoration and to plant trees that with anticipated growth
will largely restore the quality and character of the site within that established time frame. A reasonable
time frame is 20 to 25 years.
3. With growth, 2.0 inch caliper trees planted on average with a 25 foot spacing would reach crown
closure in this restoration time frame. Twenty-nine trees planted at this 25 foot spacing would be
requires to completely replace the 14,450 fP of canopy removed.
4. The kinds of trees planted should be consistent with the those that were removed (i.e. largely sugar
maple and American linden with a few red oaks mixed in). These trees are readily available in 2.0 inch
caliper
From Peter J Bedker To Mike Gaffron Date: 6/17/99 Time 11 23 00 AM
Mr. Weinberger - June 16,1999
Paged
5. The above spacing should be staggered somewhat to provide for a more natural look
6.At the top of the slope and towards both sides, larger 4.0 to 4.5 inch caliper trees should be planted.
These trees by established standards should have an average height of 16 to 18 feet and 18 feet and
greater, respectively (ANSI Z60.M990). These trees should provide sufficient to begin to soften and
obscure the roof line of the Lusaich residence from the lake as soon as they are planted. The peak of
the east gable is 18 feet above grade and the peak of the gable end in the center of the house is 26
feet above grade
7. Existing stumps and root systems should be left in place They will continue to stabilize the slope and
prevent erosion. Any engineered solution would replace the natural character of the site. The
exception to this are three stumps located in the center of the house at the top of the slope, these may
be removed with a minimum of concern.
8. Planting within the slope should be done by hand with a minimum of soil disturbance.
The above parameters should provide sufficient guidance for developing a landscape restoration plan for
the Luzaich residence. Unfortunately, it will still take time for the landscape to recover.
Please call me if you have any questions, or if I may be of further assistance.
Consulting Community Forester
Page 4 of 5
V-
I
tfi niafl'fir rtl I r
From Peter J Bedker To Mike Gaffron Date 6/17/99 Time 11 23 CO Afvl Page 5 of 5
Mr. Weinberger • June 16, 1999
Page 4
Tabic 1. List of significant trees removed from ttie Luadch residence, 2490 Old Beach Road.
Tree Species
Stump
Height (ft)
Stump Diameter
(In)
Estimated
OBH (in)
Estimated
Value
1 Sugar maple 45 15.7 15.7 $1,600
2 American linden 3.5 204 195 $2,200
3 Sugar maple 21 21.0 18.8 S2.200
4 American linden 0.8 162 23.3 S3,200
(five stems)00 13.2
0.8 13.2
0.8 12.6
0.8 14.4
5 Sugar maple 1.5 18.0 13.6 $1,300
6 Sugar maple 0.7 15.6 11.7 $1,100
7 Sugar maple 0.7 19.?28.1i'$4,400
(tA/o stems)07 31.2
8 Sugar maple 1.0 265 20.3 $2,500
9 American linden 0.7 33.0 25.5 S3,500
10 Norihern red oak 4.5 30.6 30.6 S5.100
11 Sugar maple 1.0 250 19.2 $2,200
12 American linden 1.6 20.4 41.2 $7,700
(five stems)1.6 228
2.8 22.2
2.0 12.0
2.4 21.6
13 Sugar maple 15 10 2 14.5 $1,400
14 American linden 0.7 24 0 18.4 $0
15 American linden 1.5 24.6 18.8 S2.000
16 American linden 08 45.0 35.0 $6,100
17 American linden 0.5 21.0 16.0 $1,600
Total $48,100
J Diarneter of multiple-stemmed trees is equivalent to the diameter of a single stem ’jvith the combined cross-sectional
area of the coinbined stems
9 mmw r'"'''
Treescapes
Community Forestry Consultants
1214 Third Avenue NE
Buffalo, Minnesota 55313
F
(612) 682-9562
Voice & Fax
July 15.1999
Gary Mueller
Landplan Associates
9311 Rich Valley Blvd.
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077
'
RE: Review of Revised Planting Plan for R. Luzaich Residence
2490 Old Beach Road, Orono, MN
Application #2492
Dear Mr. Muellen
This letter represents a review of your revised planting plan and outlines the parameters that would make it
'minimally acceptable* in my judgement as a restoration plan. This is as per your request during our phone
conversation on Tuesday, June 13,1999.
i have spent some time reviewing your revised planting plan and feel you and Mr. Luzaich have taken my
previous comments seriously and have made a significant effort to incorporate them into your plan. The
‘minimally acceptable” parameters incorporated into this plan include the following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The plan calls for stumps to be cut and removed flush with existing grade. This will leave root
systems intact and minimize the risk of soil erosion during establishment of the new plantings.
The shrubs you have proposed for planting on the slope have fibrous root systems, largely spread
by suckering and are well equipped to stabilize the slope and prevent erosion upon establishment
You have reduced the length of the retaining wall to make it an architectural feature at the base of
the stairs. You have not provided proposed elevations for me top of the walls, but I assume they
are in the neighborhood of three to four feet above existing grade.
The large maturing tree species is appropriate and more diverse than what was there previously.
This adds interest to the property.
In my report to the City of Orono of June 16.1999,1 stats^i a reasonable restoration time frame would
be 20 to 25 years. For the proposed species, 2.5 inch j>'es would have crown diameters of 25 to
Plant Health Care Management ■ Tree Management Plans ■ Tree Inventories ■ Hazard Tree Assessments
Mr. Mueller-July 15,1999
Page 2
30 feet after 20 to 25 years. Using these estimates your revised planting plan would result in 6.235 to
8,110 fP of tree canopy. This represents 43 to 56 percent of the estimated total removed. However, a
significant portion of this tree canopy will be over the adjacent properties to the northwest and the
southeast (see attached figure).
In my opinion, although this revised planting plan makes some significant strides forward, it does yet
represent an adequate restoration plan. Needed revisions to make this plan “minimally acceptable ’ include
the following:
1.Proposed planting locations of canopy trees along each side of the property need to be moved
toward the center of the property by 10 feet
2.The plan must propose to restore a minimum of 90% of the estimated 14,450 ft^ of tree canopy that
was removed at 25 years after planting.
This area can be achieved by increasing the spacing between proposed trees slightly and planting an
additional six to eight trees with a minimum spacing of 25 feet The current spacing of canopy trees is
approximately 19 feet on average. Three of these trees should be planted at or above the 950 foot
contour with one of these three planted at or above the 956 foot contour.
I hope this helps to clarify the criteria that I will use to evaluate your proposed restoration plan. Please
don't hesitate to give me a call if you have any questions.
VIC-
Peter J. Bedker, Ph.D.
Consulting Community Forester
Enclosure
cc; Rick Luzaich
Paul Weinberger, City of Orono
I
L
h iw
C.<XVvftpy Covftv
25 'yeo^o p^a.vA'iv*-^
E*Viv^«^^«i +6^*^N * (i»255 A
4*pV®»\ vemo>>*^
\
Frorrf Peter J. Bedker To; Paul Weinberger Date 7/25/99 Time; 11 40 16 Page 2 of 2
Treescapes
Oommunity Foreafrr OonaultAnts
1214 Third Avenue NE
Buffalo. Minnesota 55313
(612) 682-9562
Voice 6t Fax
July 25. 1999
Paul Weinberger
City 6f Orono
2750 Kelly Parkway
Orono. MN 55356
RE: Review of Revised (7/21/99) Pianting Plan for R. Luzaich Residence
2490 Old Beach Road, Orono, MN
Application #2492
Dear Mr. Weinberger:
I have had a chance to review the revised planting plan for the R. Luzaich residence at 2490
Old Beach Road. They made the modifications that i requested in my letter to Mr Mueller of
July 13. 1999.
With these modifications they propose to plant 24 canopy trees in addition to many shrubs and
small trees. The average spacing of the canopy trees still a little tight. On average the trees
are proposed to be planted 18 7 ft on center. Using the seme analysis that I have used
previously the proposed planting plan will restore approximately 63% of the estimated existing
canopy cover in the 25 year restoration period.
I am prepared to recommend adoption of this plan with only slight reservations. By increasing
the space between proposed trees they could increase the canopy cover to over 90% and I
would have no reservations whatsoever.
I hope this is of help. Unfortunately, I am out of the office for the next three days and won’t be
ableip answer any further questions.
incerwy
Peter J. B^ker. Ph.D.
Consulting Community Forester
Plant Honlih Cnre KUinAgcinctU ■ Irce Managemeut Pious ■ Treclnveiuories ■ Hazard Tree Assessments
M
Vi .
# I"’?tr
..n
/K -•
*:*•*\ r 1
•.V.y «
> ' _
i-<sJ
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 T
#2485 ALEX AND CATHY JOHNSTON, CONTINUED
Aiex Johnston was present.
Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow a "guest house".
This property is located In the RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential District, which is a two acre
zoning district, and Is comprised of 5.1 acres dry and 4.55 acres dry contiguous. A bam exists
on the southeast portion of the property that the Applicant Is remodeling to install a guest
apartment. The bam is classified as an oversized accessory structure as it exceeds 1,000 square
feet.
Weinberger commented that as a condition of approval the property owner will be required to file a
restrictive covenant on the property that states, in part, that no future subdivision will be approved
thPt places the str- :re .vithin a lot that has no principal structure, and if the property Is subdivided,
the oversize accessory structure and principal structure will be located together within a lot that
meets that minimum lot area requirement for the given size of accessory building.
Weinberger stated that the property does not have a conforming septic system. The Applicants
have submitted a septic design that has been approved by the City, but a condition of approval
shall be that a final plumbing inspection be held until the septic system has been installed and
approved by the City.
City Staff is recommending approval of thi application based on the existing structure meets ail
the yard requirements established by City Code for a guest house conditional use permit subject
to the conditions that a restrictive covenant is filed on the property for an oversized accessory
structure and that a final plumbing inspection be held until a septic system has been installed and
approved by the City.
Alex Johnston had no comment on his application.
Hawn commented that there does not appear to be any areas of contention with this application.
There were no public comments.
Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2485,
940 Brown Road South, to allow a guest house conditional use permit subject to the
structure meeting the yard requirements established by the Municipal Code for a guest
house conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: The property owner
files a restrictive covenant on the property for an oversized accesso'y structure as outlined on
Page 1, Items A, B. and C, of the May 10,1999 Zoning Administrator’s Report, and that
a final plumbing inspection be heid until a septic system has been installed and approved
b> ine City. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
Item #7 follows Item #10.
(#8) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - VARIANCE AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:23 p.m. - 8:17 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Rick and Gail Luzalch were present.
Page?
r
i
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NDNUTES FOR MAY 17,1999
#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED
Phil Reznick, Attomey-at-Law, was present.
Weinberger staled the Applicants are requesting variance and conditional use permit approvals for
lakeshore land afteration. including grading and construction of retaining walls within 75' of the
lakeshore and within a bluff impact zone; and further request an after-the-fact approval, Including
approval of a restoration plan, for intensive vegetative removal within 75 feet of the shoreline and
within a bluff impact zone. No restoration at this time has been completed.
Weinberger noted that the members of the Planning Commission have had an opportunity to
look at the property. Staff has concerns regarding the removal of the trees within 75 feet of the
shoreline due to possible erosion into the lake.
The Applicant is proposing to construct a four foot retaining wall to extend along the slope. Staff
has Issues regarding the proposed landscaping plan as it does not contain any provisions for
replacement of the trees that have been removed. Staff is requesting that reforestation be required
as part of this application. Wally Case. Landscape Architect, has had an opportunit> to review
the landscaping plan and is recommending that this property be reviewed by a forester to determine
what trees would be best for this type of soil.
City Staff is recommending denial of the proposed landscape plan and requests that the Applicant
submit revised plans. Currently the stumps have not been removed. Staff would also like to have
the opportunity to review this application over time to Insure that proper restoration of this area is
achieved with similar trees.
Reznick inquired whether the City was requiring a replanting of mature trees approximately the
same size removed or if the Applicant could replace this type of trees writh a smaller size tree.
Weinberger stated that the City is requesting that the Applicant replace the trees with fairly mature
trees, noting that it is not possible to replace sorr.e of the larger trees.
Reznick expressed a concern regarding the cost of replacing the trees and suggested that the City
look at what is right for the property rather than punishing the property owners. Reznick noted that
the Applicant has been charged with a misdemeanor. The Applicants are veiling to cooperate with
the City to accomplish the restoration, but they would like to keep this property in line with the
other surrounding properties.
Reznick presented photographs to the Planning Commission and noted that the other properties
do not have the lake hidden from their view. Reznick requested that the Planning Commission
address the house plan, noting that the Applicants would like to start work on this property in the
near future. Reznick indicated that they would like to remove the stumps and replace wrth some
shrubbing, and expressed a concern that the equipment that would be needed to replace the
trees could cause the soil to be disturbed further.
Hawn indicated that she would like to see this property restored as quickly as possible to prevent
erosion. Hawn noted that the City has allowed rift-raft in cases where erosion has occun-ed, but
that the retaining walls are probably not going to be looked upon favorably by the Planning
Commission. Hawn stated that the Applicants will need to get together with the City foresters to
determine what is mosi feasible for this property.
Luzalch stated that he is fine with restoring the property, noting that he has spent money trimming
and pruning me other trees on his property and had merely removed what he thought was old
Pago 8
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999
(#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED
unhealthy trees.
St: idard remarked that the Planning Commission hdS to act on what Is before it tonight, noting
that the Planning Commission is merely a recommending bc<iy and that any plans would need to
be approved by the City Council. Stoddard commented that the Applicant should work with City
Staff on the reforestation, noting that he would like to see some mature trees planted to screen
the neighbors' view as well as the proposed hardcover reduced.
Luzaich stated they had proposed the retaining walls in an effort to save the hill.
Weinberger commented that the stumps could possibly be removed but that the roots should
remain to help hold the dirt in place with new plants and trees planted.
Reznick Inquired whether anything could be agreed to tonight.
Eric Paulson, Old Beach Road, stated that he has lived in this area for the past 21 years and
belongs to the Lafayette Bay Association which has been proactive In trying to preserve the natural
beauty of Lafayette Bay. Paulson remarked that the property owners were perhaps ignorant of the
laws regarding removal of trees by the lakeshore.
Gaffron remarked that the City of Orono did not and would not issue a permit to allow this type of
tragedy to occur, noting that the City was not notified of this until a week after the work had already
been completed. Gaffron stated that the City of Orono Is adamant in its position that this type of
land alteration not occur near the lakeshore and that it is impossible to get back what has been
lost.
Weinberger stated that Wally Case is recommending that this property be reviewed by a forester
who will review the Tile and look at the types of soils and determine what types of trees could be
planted. Weinberger stated that they would like to have this process started sometime this week.
Hawn Inquired whether the Applicant ’s landscape planner could meet with the forester.
Gary Mueller, Landscape Architect, stated he would be able to meet with the forester, noting that
they are willing to discuss this property and the recommendations that they have. Mueller
requested that the Planning Commission provide some guidance as to what they feel should be
provided for this area.
Hawn stated that retaining walls are not the answer.
Stoddard stated that ha>^ • over should be reduced and that he would like to see some larger trees
planted.
Lindquist remarked that the Comprehensive Plan is clear and that everything possible should be
done to restore what was lost. Lindquist stated that they should meet with the City's forester as
soon as possible to resolve this issue. Lindquist commented that this application will need to be
tabled since the proposal is not acceptable as presented tonight.
Berg commented that she is in agreement with the other members of the Planning Commission and
would like to see some larger trees planted in this area to help restore what was lost.
Luzaich inquired whether the stairway down to the lakeshore was okay.
Page 9
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999
#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED
Stoddard stated that he should work with City Staff to determine the appropriate width of the
stairway, noting that the Planning Commission is not attempti ng to deny access to the lake by the
Applicant.
Mueller stated that they would like to remove the stumps, grind them down to the point where they
are no longer protruding, which will require some minor grading of the slope. Mueller stated that
they would also like to eradicate the poison ivy and other nuisances that occur on the bank.
Muelier inquired whether they could commence work on the retaining wall as a means to prevent
erosion, noting that they will have a civil engineer out to inspect the site to insure that the wali wiii
stay in place. Mueller commented that they would like to have a better understanding of what type
of trees and size of trees the City would like to see for this area, noting that it is impossible to
replace some of the larger trees.
Hawn stated that they would like to see as large of trees planted as possible that have a good
chance for survival, end that perhaps the forester would be in a better position to address that.
Mueiier inquired whether this application could proceed to the City Council on the condition that
agreement is reached with City Staff on a level of treatment that is appropriate for this area.
Stoddard stated the Pianning Commission can vote on this appiication or table the application,
noting that the Applicant will not be able to do any grading or retaining walls.
Mueller inquired whether the stumps could be removed.
Lindquist stated that in his opinion no work shouid be done given the history of this application until
it has been approved. Lindquist remarked that he would not be comfortable approving any work on
this property until City Staff and the City's forester has had an opportunity to look at this situation,
and that in his opinion this application should be tabled.
Stoddard indicated they could spray the poison ivy.
Mueller inquired whether all the weeds could be sprayed.
Stoddard stated that only the poison ivy may be sprayed.
Hawn commented that the weeds may be cut. Hawn indicated that this appiication will probably be
denied if voted on tonight.
Weinberger indicated that this application requires variances and a conditional use permit that
needs to be acted upon regardless of the tr.idscape plan. City Staff is willing to work with the
Applicant on this matter.
Luzaich requested that his application be tabled.
Hawn inquired whether the 60 day time limit needs to be extended.
Weinberger inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to waive the 60 day limitation.
Luzaich indicated he wouid be willing to waive the 60 day time period.
Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to table Application #2492, 2490 Old Beach Road,
Page 10
t
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NHNUTES FOR MAY 17,1999
#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED
with the understanding that the Applicant will work with City Staff and the City’s forester
on an appropriate plan of action for restoration of the lakeshore and bluff area, and
that the 60 day time period is waived. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
(#9) #2493 KATHERINE TAYLOR HOMES, 692 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCES, 8:18 p.m. -
8:47 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Katherine Taylor was present.
Barb Hugh, property owner, was present.
Weinberger stated the A ppllcant is requesting several variances to construct a two car garage where
a one car garage exists and to attach a deck to the second garage on the property. The property
is served with two garages, the first is a one stall detached located on Tonkawa Road and the
second Is a two car garage attached to the house. This property is located in the LR-1B, One Family
Lakeshore Residential District, which has a minimum of one acres, and this property consists of
.36 acre.
The Applicf .U is proposing to construct a deck off the back portion of the two car garage with a spiral
staircase I jcated next to it, which would allow access to that area. Currently there are building
permits 5 jsued to this property for the remodeling of an office area above the existing garage. The
deck becomes an issue because It is new hardcover located over existing hardcover, and any time
that structural coverage is placed over non-structural hardcover, it requires a hardcover variance.
The addition of the deck would net increase the hardcover on this property, nor would it increase the
amount of structural coverage allowed on the property. The deck would bring the structural
coverage to 15 percent.
The Applicant has proposed two options for the garage. Option A would move the garage back to the
required 30 foot distance for a garage loading space of a right-of-way. However, the setback In this
area is 35 feet, so it would still require a variance to the street yard setback. This option increases
structural coverage to 16.4 percent, exceeding the 15 percent allowed. This option also allows the
occupants of the property easier access in and out of the garage during the winter months when the
steep driveway approach prevents safe access into the property. Hardcover would also increase In
the 250-500 ’ setback. Currently hardcover is at 42.5 percent. Only a small portion of the residence
is located within the 75-250 ’ setback. The Applicant is proposing hardcover In the amount of 70.2
percent in the 250-500* setback.
Weinberger stated Option B would utilize the existing location of the one stall garage. The Applicant
would construct a second stall to the existing one stall garage. This maintains the garage within the
required setbacks on the property, but still would require hardcover and structural coverage
variances This option would not Increase the hardcover as substantially as Option A. This option
simply places an addition on the existing garage, which Is located approximately two to three feet off
the property line. The new garage proposed in Option A would meet the 10 foot setback.
City Staff has reviewed this plan and have determined that the Applicant could construct a two stall
garage that would be located 10 feet from the street property line and 10 feet from the side property
line if the doors are faced away from the street. However, this option probably cannot be done since
City Code requires a distance of 30 feet from the garage doors to the street. Tonkawa Road Is a
Page 11
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JUNE 21,1999 K
(#2496 PATRICK AND JEANNE O'FLANAGAN. CONTINUED)
small lot size.
Stoddard commented that that is a bigger Issue than what is before the Planning Commission
tonight.
Hawn stated that the Planning Commission is routinely asked to approve variances for small lots
and that this issue should perhaps be addressed.
Smith noted that the total structural coverage is under the allowable limits and that the Applicant
is not able to place the garage in a different location.
Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2496,
to allow for the location of an existing detached garage and two decks on the property
located at 3895 North Shore Drive, and to permit a crowding principal structure variance
to allow a six foot wide deck to be constructed between the existing residence and the
proposed detached garage where ten feet is required, to permit a side yard variance
to allow the accessory structure (detached garage) to be located six feet where ten feet
is required from the side lot line, to permit a rear yard variance to allow construction of
the proposed 8 by 18 foot deck on the south side of the residence 24 feet from the rear
lot line where 30 feet is required, subject to inspection by the City Building Inspector of
the footings or slab on grade for the garage. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
OLD BUSINESS
(#2) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD, AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Rick Luzaich, Applicant, was present, along with Phil Reznick, Attomey-at-Law, and Gary Mueller,
Landscape Architect.
Gaffron stated this application was reviewed at the May 17th Planning Commission wherein the
Planning Commission advised the Applicant that the proposed restoration plan was not appropriate
and the Applicant was directed to submit a revised plan after consultation with Staff and the City's
consulting forester.
Gaffron stated that the Applicant submitted a revised plan prior to meeting with the City’s consulting
forester, which incorporates a single retaining wall at the base of the slope along with replacement
of a small number of trees along the sides of the property. The Applicant’s landscape architect and
the City’s consulting forester discussed the proposal, and concluded that their individual strategies
for restoration of this property are quite different. Gaffron noted that it is the City’s goal to have the^
lakeshore restored to a \,ooded. natural appearance as quickly as possible, and while the Applicant’s
plan is a good landscape plan, it is not a restoration plan.
Gaffron reviewed the City’s consulting forester's comments and recommendations regarding the
restoration of this property, noting that a total of 17 trees with a stump diameter 12 inches or
greater were removed from the lake side of the residence, with the value of the removed trees being
estimated at $48,000. It would generally be unreasonable to expect restoration costs to exceed this
amcunt, Bedker Is recommending that 29 trees of two inch caliper on a 25 inch average spacing
would be needed to eventually replace the 14,450 square feet of lost canopy, with larger 4.0 to 4.5
inch caliper trees being placed at the top of the slope to soften and obscure the roofline of the
Page 3
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JUNE 21,1999
(#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED)
existing residence as viewed from the lake. Bedker is also recommending that the majority of the
existing stumps and root systems remain in place to stabilize the slope, as well as hand planting of
the trees to avoid disturbing the soil. Bedker has indicated that the retaining wail at the base of the
slope Is not necessary for stabilization of the slope.
Gaffron stated the Applicant is proposing four birch clumps at the base of the slope and a half-dozen
maples along the two sides of the site, along with other proposed shrubbery along the edges of the
lot or on the lake side of the retaining wall.
Gaffron noted that the Applicant's revised proposal makes no attempt to, over time, restore the site
to its original appearance in compliance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code which
states: Lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas
will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff and soil
erosion, and to utiiize excess nutrients. Clearcutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave
action erosion, natural stone rip-rap shoreline protection will be encouraged. In addition, retention
of natural vegetation will limit the l.mpact of urbanization as visible from the lake. Building heights
will be limited to less than the typical tree height. Minimum green belts will be provided with
prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be
preserved on slopes. Retaining walls will be discouraged except when absolutely necessary to
prevent erosion, in which case they wiil be screened with natural vegetation.
Gaffron suggested the Planning Commission has the option of denying this application, and sending
it on to Council, noting that the revised landscape plan does not meet the restoration goals of the
City: or this matter could be tabled to allow the Applicant time to submit a revised plan in accordance
with the Ci*y forester's recommendations.
Reznick commented that the Applicant’s revised plan was submitted in May but that the City’s
forester was not provided with the necessary information until this past Friday. The Applicant's
landscape architect was not able to meet with the City’s forester due to the short time period
before tonight’s meeting.
Reznick stated that the four inch diameter trees are too large to bring in to be planted, and that
the Applicant should not be penalized by having to plan trees in excess of $48,100.
Stoddard remarked that the Applicant is not being requested to plant trees in excess of $48,100,
noting that the forester states that it would be unreasonable to expect restoration costs to exceed
that amount.
Reznick stated in his opinion the value of the trees removed should not have a bearing on what is
being proposed for restoration and is irrelevant.
Nygard stated that the number of the trees cut down Is completely relevant, noting that it is against
City’s regulations regarding clearcutting of property.
Reznick stated the issue before the Planning Commission is what to do with the property now and
that the Applicant should not be requested to plant more trees than what was removed. Reznick
commented that a majority of the trees to be replanted are located within the site line from the
house to the take and that the property owner does have a right to trim the trees located within the
sight line. Reznick stated that the trees removed were removed to provide a view to the lake.
Luzaich commented that their revised plan Is a compromise by providing reforestation as well as
Page 4
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JUNE 21,1999
(#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH. CONTINUED)
providing a view of the lake. Luzalch stated that the amount of trees recommended by the City's
forester to be planted are excessive and that the trees will need to be trimmed to provide a view of
the lake. Luzaich remarked that he would also like to plant vegetation along the slope rather than
let weeds grow.
Smith stated that the forester is recommending natural vegetation on the slope and that some
reconciliation of the two plans needs to be accomplished.
Mueller stated that the revised plan was submitted shortly after the last Planning Commission
meeting and attempts were made to follow the directions of the Planning Commission as far as
replanting of the trees, noting that the trees and shrubs that were selected are intended to blend in
and look like they belong aiong the lakeshore, which was one of the objectives th'^t the Planning
Commission had stated at the last meeting.
Mueller stated that the property owner should have the right to have a view of the lake, noting that
the forester's plan does not allow that view and would create more of a wall of vegetation.
Mueller remarked that he made numerous attempts to contact Paul Weinberger in an effort to
t btain the name of the City's forester and was not able to reach him until June 7th. Mueller stated
he was not able to contact the forester until June 11th and was informed that he Just received the
information regarding this application the other day. During the conversation with the forester H was
apparent that the forester was not provided with the revised landscape plan by the Applicant. The
forester's plan was not received until the 14th, which did not allow time for the Applicant to meet
wit;-! the forester and to develop a revised plan based upon his recommendations.
Mueiler remarked that there are discrepancies in the number of trees and the size of the trees
that were purportedly removed, and that these issues will need to be worked out before another plan
is revised. Mueller commented that the Applicant's landscape plan was designed to meet the
spirit of what the Planning Commission had recommended at the last meeting.
Stoddard commented that the Planning Commission wanted the Applicant's landscape architect
to meet with the City's forester in order to develop a plan that would be agreeable to all parties and
is in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Stoddard stated he would like Mueller to
meet with the City's forester in order to address some of these issues.
Hawn stated that there are some deficiencies in the Applicant's landscape plan which need to be
addressed, and suggested that Mueller meet with the City's forester to discuss these issues.
Hawn noted that the Comprehensive Plan calls for restoration of the canopy that was removed.
Lindquist stated that it was clear at the last Planning Commission meeting that the City was looking
for restoration of this area, which is still the City's goal for this property.
Luzaich remarked that in his opinion this landscape plan does meet that objective.
Reznick stated that the revised landscape plan does include vegetation and trees that are
indigenous to the area as was specified by the Pi« ning Commission at the prior meeting. Reznick
inquired where the term reforestation is used in the Code, and what is the City's authority to
require restoration.
Hawn stated that the City's goal is to re-establish what was removed, which is something that the
Pages
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JUNE 21,1999
(#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED)
City has required in the past in similar circumstances. Hawn stated that the Comprehensive Plan
is merely a suggested code of property conduct and not a criminal code.
Stoddard stated that some of these issues should be handled by the City Attorney and City Council.
Smith commented that the City has applied the same restoration concept to other similar
situations in the past.
Gaffron stated that this happens approximately once a year and that rt has been the City's practice
to require reforestation of the area that has been cleared. Gaffron commented that it is not realistic
to expect the property owner to replace the larger trees with similar trees of the same size.
There were no public comments.
Reznick distributed photographs of the neighboring properties to the members of the Planning
Commission.
Smith inquired who was responsible for the costs of the forester.
Gaffron stated that his fees would be charged to the Applicant.
Berg commented that she has lived in that area for approximately 20 years with the area existing
as depicted in the photographs for that entire time.
Stoddard stated the Planning Commission can either vote on what is before us tonight or table the
matter to allow the Applicant time to meet with the City's forester.
Luzaich stated he would like to negotiate a plan that would be acceptable to all parties.
Hawn remarked that it is difficult to negotiate a plan that would be acceptable without the Cit/s
forester being present. Hawn stated in light of the disputed facts, it would be best if the Applicant ’s
landscape architect met with the City's forester. Hawn noted she was not in favor of the Applicant's
proposed landscape plan.
Stoddard commented that the forester's recommendations should be followed.
Smith stated she cannot approve this landscape plan as presented.
Hawn inquired whether the Applicant would like the Planning Commission to act on this plan tonight
or to table the matter, noting that if the application proceeds to the City Council and is denied, the
application would come back before the Planning Commission.
Reznick requested that this item be tabled temporarily to allow the Applicant time to discuss his
options.
(This item was tabled at 7:46 p.m. and follows Item #4)
NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS, CONTINUED
%Page 6
----------
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JUNE 21,1999
(#2497 GAIL BRINER, CONTINUED)
Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2497,1760
Shadywood Road, to allow the Applicant to rebuild an existing rotting deck, and to
grant a lakeshore setback variance to allow the proposed deck to be located within
75* of the lakeshore and to grant a hardcover variance to allow 573 square feet of hardcover
in the 0-75* lakeshore setback area to permit the construction of the proposed deck, subject
to the rock and plastic underlayment being removed under the deck and plastic removed
from under the rock that is not under the deck. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
OLD BUSINESS, CONTINUED
(#2) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT
VARIANCE
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Reznick stated that they would like the Planning Commission to vote on this application tonight
Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend denial of Application #2492, 2490 Old
Beach Road, for an after-the-fact variance and conditional use permit for a retaining wall,
and recommend to the City Council that the Applicant and the Applicant's Landscape
Architect meet with the City’s Forester in order to revise a new iandscape plan for
consideration by the City Council which is more in accordance with the recommendations of
the City Forester in order to allow this item to be expedited. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 2,
Smith and Berg Opposed.
Smith stated she was opposed to this application due to the lack of direction being given by the
Planning Commission to the City Council on the revised landscape plan that is to be submitted.
Berg stated that the Planning Commission should vole on the plan that is to be presented to the
City Council.
NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS. CONTINUED
#5) #2499 THOMAS AND MARILYN SWANSON, 1740 SHADYVi/OOD ROAD - VARIANCES,
8:03 p.m. -8:16 p.m.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Thomas and Marilyn Swanson. Applicants, were present.
Gaffron staled the Applicants are proposing to assemble a temporary screen enclosure, 10* by 17*
on an existing deck. The screen enclosure will be assembled in the early spring and taken down
in the late fall. The screen enclosure and existing deck are located within the 0-75 ’ lakeshore
setback. The structural coverage would increase with the screen porch, however, the hardcover
amount does not change.
Gaffron stated that a lakeshore setback variance Is required to allow a 10’ by 17 ’ screen porch on
an existing deck to be located within 75 ’ of the lakeshore and a hardcover variance to allow 1,973
square feet, or 21.5 percent. In the 0-75 ’ lakeshore setback area where zero percent is allowed.
Page 8
i
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 12,1999
L
(»4) #2488 GREGG AND THERESA KLOHN, 4455 NORTH SHORE DRIVE-
VARIANCE - Continued
Peterson moved, Kelley seconded to amend the motion to approve a 5* side yard
variance, a street setback, allow a 10 x 18 ’ structure, and require the removal of the
cement slab. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0 (Flint abstained).
Jabbour commented that if the Council wants everyone to have the chance to have a two-car
garage, the ordinance should mandate in the hardcover calculation that an area for a two-car
garage will be subtracted on new construction.
(#5) #2492 RICK AND GAEL LUZAiCH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - VARIANCE
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Rick Luzaich, Applicant, was present.
Weinberger stated that this past Spring, the City was made aware of tree removal occurring
on the property located at 2490 Old Beach Road. The tree removal included trees located
within the 75’ setback of the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka and along a steep
slope. He displayed a diagram showing where the clear cutting occurred. The City did issue a
stop work order, but it was after the trees had been removed. The stop work order occurred
prior to the removal of any of the stumps and any regrading that was proposed to occur.
Weinberger reviewed the ordinances covering tree removal. Part of the code addresses
intensive vegetation clearing and does not allow intensive vegetation clearing within 75’ of the
shoreline or on steep slopes within the shoreland area. Tree removal with. "’ of the
lakeshore requires a permit from the City. Nearly the entire area is within 75’ of the shoreline
or on a steep slope.
Shortly after the stop work order was issued, staff met witii a landscaper hired by Mr. Luzaich
to discuss the proposed landscape plan. Weinberger displayed a plan re\dewed by the Planning
Commission in May 1999. The plan consisted of a series of retaining walls on the slope and
would have required major grading along the entire steep slope. The Planning Commission
tabled the application and recommended tl)-" t the applicant work wth staff to develop a plan
that didn’t require grading or retaining wrJls. The Planning Commission also wanted to sec
the plan demonstrate restoration of the tjpes of vegetation removed, not what appeared on
the landscape plan. The plan did not reflect what was removed from the site and did not show
any mature trees being replf*ced.
The City then retained Dr. Peter Bedker, a consulting forester, to complete a site analysis of
the property and make recommendations for staff and for the property owners. He looked at
the site to determine the types of soils, the slope and the types of trees that had exi;>ted on the
property. Dr. Bedker compiled a list of recommendations and estimated the value of the
removed trees at $48,000. He recommended that an adequate replacement would be 29 trees
of 2” caliper to be spaced 25’ apart. He also recommended 4' to 4 1/2” caliper trees at the top
Page 10
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 12,1999
(#5) H2492 RJCKAND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Continued
- VARIANCE AND
of the hill. Dr. Bedker did state it might be counter productive to put a 16” tree back for a 16’
tree as the tree may or may not survive. A smaller tree may survive better and surpass the
growth of a more mature tree.
The Planning Commission reviewed a revised plan at their June meeting. The plan had one
large retaining wall running from one side of the property to the other. The plan implemented
some grading and there were a few hardwood trees included. It was a good plan, but it did not
reflect the City ’s goals as enumerated in the Comprehensive Plan. The goal of the City is to
have a shoreline maintained that breaks up the height of the buildings and breaks up the
appearance of a built environment around the lake. A larger canopy of trees would help
prevent erosion problems. Weinberger said the Planning Commission voted, by a vote of ^2,
to deny the application in order to expedite the process and move a plan forward to the City
Council because the land is laying dormant and some types of erosion control will have to be
implemented in order to protect the shoreline.
Weinberger reported that Gary Mueller, Mr. Luzaich ’s landscape architect, met with Dr.
BedJier to discuss some Df the issues and Dr. Bedker’s recommendations. Weinberger said the
plan brought in some of Dr. Bedker’s recommendations, but it does not address all of them.
There is still a large amount of grading be'mg proposed on the hill side and not the
recommended type of trees. He said that a new plan was received from Mr. Mueller on Friday,
July 9,1999. This plan implemented some of Dr. Bedker’s recommendations and it is closer to
the goal of restoration along the lakeshore. The amount of grading on this plan would be very
minimal. Two areas of retaining wall would be used to support the existing stairwell. The
types of trees have increased, but they are all located along the property lines and they art not
in areas that allow for a more natural appearance from the lake. In the middle of the plan th^re
is a series of perennial plan tings which would be adequate for erosion control. They are
naturrl and would not require high levels of maintenance. It was noted in Dr. Bedker s
recommendations that there be 25’ spacing between trees. The plan does not address the issue
of the 29 tree replacement. There is a concern about the center of the property and the trees
being located completely on the sides of the property and not in front of the house or along
the shoreline. He displayed photon . aphs of the property. Dr. Bedker communicated to
Weinberger that most of his recommendations are answered by this plan with the exception of
the spacing between the trees and location of some trees in thf front of the house and near the
shoreline.
Jabbour asked Weinberger to ekborate on the vote by the Planning Commission.
Weinberger responded that the two votes that were opposed to the recommendation of denial
by the Planning Commission were because the Planning Commission thought it was
aperopriate to review another plan. They were not necessarily in suppoit of the plan that was
in front of Uiem, but they felt that they should present a plan to the City Council that they had
Page 11
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 12,1999
(U5) U2492 RICK AND GAEL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Continued
- VARIANCE AND
reviewed. The other members of the Planning Commission felt it was important to expedite
the process.
Sansevere asked if Weinberger had any idea from Dr. Bedker how many trees he wanted to
see in the middle of the property and ^ong the shoreline.
Weinberger said that according to the appraisal value, the plan is approximately 10 trees short;
however. Dr. Bedker felt the goals could be accomplished by fewer trees, three or four at the
top of the hill and a couple of trees toward the bottom of the hill.
Luzaich stated his reasons for removing the trees. He said the trees were storm damaged and
there was dead fall. He said he should have applied for a permit, but he did not. He feels this
plan is appropriate and fits the neighborhood.
Jabbour said the plan does not fit the Comprehensive Plan for a natural-looking environment.
Luzaich said he objects to paying for retaining Dr. Bedker. He said this is the third plan he has
submitted and he has tried to work wth the City staff. He pointed out that in front of the
residence there are another two acres of land containing approximately 1,100 trees.
Jabbour said he concurs with the City forester’s recommendations. Jabbour said he feels that
4-6 ” trees could be planted. He would like the neighbors consulted so their view of the lake is
not cut off. He said his primary concern is to revegetate the hill and bring it back as much as
possible.
Sansevere asked if Luzaich would object to putting trees in the imddle of the property and
along the lakeshore.
Luzaich said he does not want to put trees in the middle of the property and along the
lakeshore because he would not be able to see the lake.
Sansevere pointed out that the photographs of the neighboring properties show trees in the
middle of the property and along the lakeshore.
Kelley referred to the memo from Dr. Bedker, page 2, comment 2, which states that it is not
reasonable or practical to transplant large trees as part of this restorafiort Kelley asked why
Dr. Bedker came to that conclusion and if it was because of money.
Weinberger said the main reason is that Dr. Bedker is dealing with the $48,000 for
restoration, but he also felt that often smaller trees will survive better and surpass the growth
of larger trees.
Page 12
tL-i
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 12,1999
(US) U2492 RICK AND GAR. LVZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Continued
- VARIANCE AND
Kelley said he does not want him to be constrained by dollars and he doesn’t care if it costs
Luzaich $100,000 to replace the trees. He would like to get an opinion from the forester that
money is not an issue in reforestation of this property
Weinberger said that Dr. Bedker told him they arc essentially estimates on what they figure
the value of the tree is. He said it b usually a formula that could be used for insurance or
appraisal purposes, but it is not exact. He said the size of the trees can be negotiated.
Jabbour said Kelley is trying to find out what the practical size of a tree is and what is the
biggest tree that could be planted without starting to impair growth by its size.
Flint said the risk is greater the larger the tree.
Gaflfron said that Dr. Bedker told him you can assume that a 2” tree will not thrive for 2 years,
a 3 ” tree will not thrive for three years and so on. It will take longer for a larger diameter tree
to start to grow again. There will be better and quicker growth and a greater chance of
survival with smaller trees.
Jabbour said he would like to see staff develop a revegetation plan, he would like to see the
neighbors approve it, a staff recommendation for an assurance on longevity, right of entry,
and a letter of credit. He said the trees should be scattered similarly to how they were located
before they were cut down.
Kelley said he wants protection for the future that the trees will be maintained.
KeUey moved to refer the matter to the consultant for a restoration plan. There was no
second to the motion.
Jabbour asked how long a waiver the City has from the applicant.
Weinberger said the applicant signed a waiver form where there is no deadline date.
Kelley asked Barrett if that was okay.
Barrett said yes.
Jabbour asked Barrett if there is any action the City must take to protect its interests.
Barrett said the CouncU can take action on the application for the coiiditional use permit
unless they wish to have the restoration plan included with the conditional use per mit. He said
the City does not need to depend for the reforestation plan on some application made by the
Page 13
%
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 12,1999
(»5) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD
CONDITIONAL VSEPERMIT- Continued
-VARIANCE AND
applicant. He said the City has an independent legal basis to compel the landowner to reforest
and restore the property which has been altered illegally.
Jabbour asked the applicant what he would like the Council to do.
Luzaich said he wants the Council to approve the plan.
Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to deny the restoration plan for Application #2492,
Rick and Gail Luzaich, 2490 Old Beach Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Luzaich said tlus is the third plan he has submitted. He said from what he can tell, the City
wants him to let the weeds on the hill grow wild and plant a mass of trees so he can't see the
lake. He asked if that is what the Council wants him to do.
Jabbour said no. He asked Weinberger to display the plan the City is propo^g. Jabbour said
Luzaich's position was self-imposed. The City is the victim in this situation, not Mr.
Luzaich.
Weinberger said that Dr. Bedker was asked to make recommendations, not design a specific
plan.
Jabbour said that the quantity of trees should be as recommended by Dr. Bedker and they
should be in the immediate vicinity of what was cut down. If the landscape architect believes it
would be more advantageous to move some of th,:m towards the lake front, so be it. Dr.
Bedker and the landscape architect should work it out. He asked if there could be a new plan
by the next Council meeting.
Luzaich said he would consult with his landscape architect. He said he doesn't like being told
he has to plant specific trees in specific places.
Kelley said he would direct staff to have the City's consultant and the applicant's landscape
architect work together on a plan that the City’s consultant will approve. Kelley said he will
not approve a plan that the City's consultant has not approved.
Sansevere feels the applicant's plan would be detrimental to the applicant when the trees are
mature.
Luzaich said the property is so wide that he would still have a good view.
Weinberger said that Mr. Mueller and Dr. Bedker did meet to discuss the plan. He said that
when he spoke to Dr. Bedker about the plan that was submitted on Friday, Dr. Bedker stated
Pa^el4
V \
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR JULY 12,1999
(U5) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Continued
• VARIANCE AND
that most of his recommendations were implemented and the only issue he had was the
spacing of the trees.
Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to table Application #2492, Rick and Gail Luzaich,
2490 Old Beach Road, for After the Fact Variances and Conditional Use Permit
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
{*#€) #2496 PATRICK O’FLANAGAN, 3895 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES
- RESOLUTION NO. 4318
Kelley moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4318 Granting Variances to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 12 ands 15(F) and Section 10.25,
Subdivision 6(B), .\pplication #2496. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(•#7) #2499 THOMAS AND MARILYN SWANSON, 1740 SHADlc-WOOD ROAD -
VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4319
Kelley moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4319 Granting Variances to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdiv isions 1(A) and 2 and Section 10.56,
Subdivbion 16(L)(1), File #2499. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
(*#8) #2500 ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278,685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD
NORTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4320
Kelley moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4320 Granting a Conditional
Use Permit for a Media Center Addition to the Orono High School at 795 Old Crystal
Bay Road North for Orono School District #278 per Municipal Zoning Code Section
10.28, Subdivision 3, FUe #2500. VOIE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
MAYOR/COUNCDL REPORT
Kelley asked Gappa for a status report on the road projects.
Gappa said that progress is good on Fcmdale Road and the project is on schedule. On County
Road 15, they are cutting back to where the 5nald road edge will be on the north side.
Kelley asked about the road in Saga Hill
» %
Jabbour said the City has a purchase agreement. The City is wadting to fulfill hs part of the
purchase agreement which is vacating the easement in the alley.
Page IS
i
Con.
MpETINQ
SEPREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION / 5
ciTy (jf..
. Q/Q/QQDATE: 9/9/99 »vu
ITEM NO * ^
Department Approval:
Name Paul Weinberger
Title Zoning Administrator/Planner
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2511 Douglas and Claudia Whiteiey
60 Orono Orchard Road
Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Building on a through lot
Zoning District:RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre)
Lot Area: (Existing)60 Orono Orchard Road 55.862.6 s.f.
Exhibits
A
B
Resolution
Staff Report
Summary of Request
TTie Whiteley's have applied to the City for a '^''nditional Use Permit for an accessory building on
a through lot (Please refer to Exhibit D within the Staff Report). They intend to remove the existing
detached garage located on the lot and build a new garage located nearer to the center of the lot.
CUPs are required for through lots to ensure the development is consistant with the sunounding
properties and an accessor}- building is not located to detract from areas that may be assumed as front
yard areas, or having the building located in an area that may obstruct views.
The proposed location of the accessory building is would not appear to detract from adjacent
properties. As a matter of fact the garage would be located further from Orono Orchard Road. The
Whiteley’s do not intend to change access to the property with the new structure. The applicants
have not submitted elevation views of the garage, but it is assumed the building would not require
a height variance. If a height variance is needed the applicants are advised the application would be
required to be amended.
4
J
C”' * f »'
I 'lA-
Pertinent Ordinances
Section 10.02 - Definition (42) Lot-Through (A lot which has a pair of opposite lot lines abutting
two substantially parallel streets, and which is not a comer lot. On a through lot, both street lines
shall be firont lot lines for applying the Zoning Chapter.)
Section 10.28 — One Family Rural Residential Zoning District
Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 ~ All accessory buildings on through lots located in "R" Districts shall
require a conditional use permit.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission has recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0 to grant a conditional use
permit to allow the applicants to construct a detached garage on a through lot based on the location
shown on the site survey submitted by the applicant and the existing garage will be removed upon
completion of the new building.
Staff Recommendation
To adopt the resolution approving a conditional use permit for an accessory structure on a through
lot.
-r’i
A
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 10
FILE #2511
WHEREAS, Douglas Whiteley and Claudia Whiteley(hereinafter "the applicants")
are owners of the property located at 60 Orono Orchard Road within the City of Orono
(hereinafter "City") and legally described as:
Lots 59, 60, 75 and 76, Orono Orchards, according to the recorded plat of thereof,
EXCEPT the southeasterly 35.00 feet of said Lot 75, as measured at a right angle to the
southeasterly line of said Lot 75, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property");
and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning
Commission held a public hearing on August 16, 1999, at which times all persons desiring to be
heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use
permit to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 to permit the construction of an
accessory structure on a through lot.
Minnesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2511.
2. The property is located in the RR-IB, One Family Rural Residential Zoning
District.
Page 1 of 4
1I
3.
5.
6.
The Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 16, 1999 and
recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0.
4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact:
A.The accessory structure meets all required setbacks for the RR-IB Zoning
District.
B.The applicants will remove the existing detached garage located nearest to
Orono Orchard Road.
C.Access to the property will not change, any change in access to the property
will require approval of the Director of Public Services.
The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the
construction of a garage on the through lot is not detrimental to the health, safety
or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a
fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate
surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will
be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive
Plan of the City.
The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Conunission, reports by staff and comments of
the applicants and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare
of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council
hereby grants a conditional use permit to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 10
to permit the construction of a garage on the through lot located at 1365 Rest Point Road, subject
to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall construct the garage in substantial conformance with the
survey dated July 21 , 1999 on file with the Department of Building and Zoning.
Page 2 of 4
2.Authorities granted by this resolution are permissive only and must be exercised
by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval
or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (September 13, 2CKX)).
3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
4.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of
this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby
agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of September, 1999
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Property Owner(s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of September,
1999, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a
Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 3 of 4
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199 _before me a Notary Public within
and for said county, personally appeared
known to me to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
r ^
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within
and for said county, personally appeared
known to me to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 4
i
TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission
■ Ron Moorse, City Administrator
6
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner
August 11,1999
#2511 Douglas and Claudia Whiteley
60 Orono Orchard Road
Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Building on a through lot
Zoning District:RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre)
Tot Area: CExisting)60 Orono Orchard Road 55,862.6 s.f.
Exhibits
A
B
C
D
• E
Application
London Map
Plat Map
Reduced Survey
Property Owners List
Percent Ordinances
Section 10.02 - Definition (42) Lot-Through (A lot which has a pair of opposite lot lines abi^g
two substantially parallel streets, and which b not a comer lot. On a through lot, both street Imes
fhaW be front lot lines for applying the Zoning Chapter.)
Section 10.28 — One Family Rural Residential Zoning District
Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 - All accessory bmldings on through lots located in "R" Districts shall
• •require a conditional use permit.
Summary of Request
Hie WhheWs have appUed to the City for a Conditional Use Pennit for an accessory o“
a through lot They intend to remove the existing detached garage located on the lot and build a nw
garage located nearer to the center of the lot CUPs are required for through Jots
d^opment is consistant with tiie surrounding properties and an accesso^ is not to^
to detract from areas that may be assumed as front yard areas, or having the buildmg located m an
area that may obstmet views.
§2SU WhUalty
CoHdUtensI Vu Ptrmlt
Pagtl'
The proposed location of the accessory building is vrould not appear to detract from adjacent
properties. As a matter of&ct the garage would be located further ^mOrono Orchard Road. The
Whiteley's do not intend to change access to the property with the new structure. The applicants
have not submitted elevation views of the garage, but it is assumed the building would not require
a height variance. If a height variance is needed the applicants are advised the application would be
required to be amended.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the conditional use permit to allow the applicants to
construct a detached garage on a through lot based on the location shown on the site survey
submitted by the applicant and the existing garage will be removed upon completion of the
new building.
» •
r ^
• • •
§2511 WhUtUy
ComBtictial
tntm
rtti
jii
• *.. A
- t >'
Application # ^
Date Received"
Amount Paid v?
. !
• * • ;*
CITY, pp ORONO. - GENERAL LAI® USE APPLICATION
• PROPERTY LOCATION ^
Site Address
Type of Application to be Ffled
• ■ •.
lypc \Jk ------------------------------------------------------
Property Identification Number (P.ID.)
applicant
me A<Name
Address , City
Phone (homel C?/>7
Phone (work l B
_____Zip,
OWNER different than applicant)
Name____________________
Phone Oiome),
Phone (work).
Address City Zip,
Date Property Acquired
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
(month^ear)
• •
JFEES r bONDmONAL USE PERMITS - ,
$ 75.00 For each variance request . with CUP application
_ _ _ ___ ' m. a * ____ •
. •\ •
W W ^ ' — Mi
V $175.00 Residential Accessory Use
$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.)
$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apatoents ;
$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg
$300.00 Cominercial/Industrial Use
$250.00 Land Alteration .. ,
Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplam
____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more
Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore
H i
PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule
$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application).
Afler-the-Fact Fee - Double Current ^pUcation Fee • ‘ •
• • •* - • •'■*•**
OTHER APPLICATIONS ^ ^ \
_____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees)
______$300.00 Vacation
$200.00 Easement Vacation
$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision
$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) • •
$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _
_____^$100.00 Appeals
Other - see Fee Schedule
% ••••••
s
G
5 r; 3 Sfixi
_______w-*sr
IUXIO AVZ
jEisoa
•SJ100
LAKE no
tu
mi t 5^
iiffeiHESil
• •
\
fl/ocf
rr—*^ AvvV ’ '>
cV^»rri:i;v:\%
jmm•Course
•o5S
i. : fe?:a^^S^’^feCountiy
3 S
OCRERSON
f!0
s
PEAVEY
eBUHTIIIEfe^<)Mg;& I
FERNDALE
^\ RAMSEY
&
r
COMMUNICATIONS.MEDIA DIVISION
DOCUMENT COMMUNICATIONS
TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
DATE:
(°0
B
FROM: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner
August 11,1999
SUBJECT: #2511 Douglas and Claudia Whiteley
60 Orono Orchard Road
Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Building on a through lot
Zoning District:
Lot Area: (Existing)
Exhibits
A
B
C
D
E
RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre)
60 Orono Orchard Road 55,862.6 s.f.
Application
Location Map
Plat Map
Reduced Survey
Property Owners List
Percent Ordinances
Section 10.02 - Definition (42) Lot-Through (A lot which has a pair of opposite lot lines abutting
two substantially parallel streets, and which is not a comer lot On a through lot, both street lines
fhaW be front lot lines for applying the Zoning Chapter.)
Section 10.28 — One Family Rural Residential Zoning District
Section 10.03, Subdivision 10-All accessory buildings on throu^ lots located in "R" Districts shall
require a conditional use permit.
Summary of Request
The Whiteley-s have appUed to the City for a Conditional Use Permit for an accessory buU^g on
a through lot They intend to remove the existing detached garage located on the lot and build a nw
garage located nearer to the center of the lot. CUPs are required for through lots to ensure the
development is consistant with the surrounding properties and an accessory building is not looted
to detract from areas that may be assumed as front yard areas, or having the building located m an
area that may obstruct views.
§2311 Whiutty
ConHaencl Vst Ptrmit
?o*tr
The proposed location of the accessory building is would not appear to detract firom adjacent
prop^es. As a matter of fact the garage would be located further from Orono Orchard Road. The
Whiteley's do not intend to change access to the property with the new structure. The applicants
have not submitted elevation views of the garage, but it is assumed the building would not require
a height variance. If a height variance is needed the applicants are advised the application would be
required to be amended.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the conditional use permit to allow the applicants to
construct a detached garage on a through lot based on the location shown on the site survey
submitted by die applicant and the existing garage will be removed upon completion of the
new building.
• • • • • •• • « • • • •
§2Stt WhUtlty
CcnMonalVt* FvmU tntm
Fagil
. . I • • •• .• • .A
• •.Application # ^Sll
Date Beceived3l2Zii32J
Amount Paid v? /7«5'^^
. .. • . • • '
CTTY. OF ORONO, - GENERAL LANT) USE APPLICATION
•• * *** • '
• PROPERTY LOCATION ^
Site Address
Type of Application to be Filed
__ ^ m. ^ a ^ V * # AProperty Identification Number (PJD.) 7-3 t •
APPLICANT
meName tfV'fc-Jt/t^rurv^tsr/
Address /C^. City
Phone fbomeY:?/>7
Phone (work") >7 ~
Zip
OWNER Qf different thim applicant)
Name _____________________
Phone QiomeX
Phone (work).
Address City Zip.
Date Property Acquired
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
(monthtyear)
iXES - tONDmONAL USE PERMTIS - A .. .
S 75.00 For each variance request . with CUP application
_ _ * ^ * m m m ^ ^ V •
• * *•
• w W — — ---- ------ 9
5175.00 Residential Accessory Use
5250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.)
____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apatoents ;
____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg
____$300.00 Cominercial/Industrial Use
$250.00 Land Alteration ,
Gradmg and filling - designated wetland or floodplain
Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more
Grading, seaiwaU, retaining walls within 75' of lake&ore
EpS2^
fi 4
*;
PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule
$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change fi-om ori^al application).
After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current AppHcation Fee •' •
. • * • • •' . •
. ••
th
other applications , ., \
_____$250.00 Commerdal Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees)
^_____ $300.00 Vacation . .
$200.00 Easement Vacation
' ^ $100.00 Easement Vacation With Sub<fivision
' ” $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule)
• $350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _
_____^$100.00 Appeals •
Other - see Fee Schedule
WOOLT
£n
0
lUJi
1 -^K^WV
ID I^-A?Tr,0;
%;i-.v; V'tj; •;.
•-. • *• rf'• ^ ;
TEA 000
:aA;.’D a'h
tEi^a
SiiSESii
^la
4?:?/.
iggi^11
*S5??
• •
\
fl/OCf
)
IK
,»oOiS^ I?
* ..ikA
_____ 600
0!-^
%
i-'-'i
HILL
AVE
lv-:%^‘ t'r:
Ir. .*>:!! •■//ciiv
——'--------
ycilb/
OCXEIISON
<
. ^
ioll.Cou
^yj:GREENTL^^
0i
FERNDALE
^\ RAHSEt
vSTbd”
SJA*1
.■•,,• ,v •■'■,■.•;-■;:> ... ' v"?../d<‘
•; '■ .. • • ’=••. ’ - -• • • ." . *■’• L'. •• ' • . rv .* r- -
I ' .■ ■••■..*. . * • ■ ' ■ r t J '•tmtrr! •• ^ ^ ^ '. • ..V.................. V . !'•••-. f •• * •«.• *t .*
;v . ?. • ~ ~ I I "iv ’ • ;d^' ' ■ • •
I • • «• . • • ^ .. 'I H** . *. . •% *.•. . 1.09 . ;• ••* I,
^ •- . ■■ ••■. . .•..•■ V-; ■ ••• '•
■ ■ - df• . .- ,:• - ; \V ' r- fV«- iJ
I . -. ’•• V.• ................... ■•" •- /’ v - >■: ■. •!• "T' •• 'v-" ■ .• ■ i - .. >^^-141
• •• «•
A. ••• •• •0 •• »
• • •ft Jl k. *
* /•• •
» •
•• • •
)• •
• • *.
• * . *• * •• •.••. V-
;/.
I
• • •* •. * •
.. . .?.vj
• • •
»*
0 •
$
t* •
f •W 9
jiV;-. ; f •.
• .
•Hm
• . •
•
%•
*.* ••
• <
•. • •
• >
••
..:.0,
•• ••« ’i
• •• •7
• /.*• >••
» <
/
•• • i
•*.%• • r •• •• •
I% •/• •
•-f ••
• I •
- •*
► ^ «
0^
' •
•• • •
.* r *• • •
.* #d'
• •. • • »••
0 '
•• • •
m •
• •I
. I *'>.v
A « •
r. •«• •••
% <
'« •
\
• •
• •« \• •'• •• •
*.* * .*• •
; .
••
• t •. ,•* * •«.• . •
jO% .. ”/•
/
• t *!• *^V Ja l>
0 • •• •
• . •• I-
... ’•
? •
; •:. •.• %
• • .•
4.V
«• f •i
• • • ••
'A *•
I •* ,
••: V:
’•* /
• •.
•. t
I %• ••:• ••• •
.•• •...•'
\
* • *
.• .4• ••*. ». • •
•• •
' • • t«» • • *. •• **./ . >
* •
* •«
* •*.
.•*. II n ••
,. »• • ■ 2
. •
*• •
•- .•
• •
• «\
\ <
• •
• *
f
II-
• •
f*
V• . .
• • >'
1 .%* • •- - •
A i > • . ••
• • •
• 0
.
VI*'
* t •>
V •
fW^StKF ’'
• *.'• •*
• *
. %
• •
I.
•r .'V • f -• • -•
• •/ •i0.5
• • * • • «• •• •
• # .
• • .•A i • *1 • * .
t . •
• - v »
• i» >
* «* • • •
/ •
; «
/• 'I• * •*• . • • . •
/ *** •,
• . •• .
I m
\ .
^ •; .
O it;
0^<'.
•i
I • •
• •
• • •
• •
• . t
/'S^/
*• \
• f
.• •
•• •*
/ 0^ 0 r
^!
• *
m
! -
* •
• • •••
•. ‘'V \
!;*%« • i*
• •• •
•*i ‘ V .V
• •?* .
« •» ••
• •.< •: !;
f ••• ••
I •••
/ V ./iraI m mmt.. ^ 0 v ‘
^ V
: -
V t. •• ' ••• *.4
. I n ^ •/' •.* ,V • w
• ••.
..
t «•/ir
» /
• •
> >* • ft <rT*
I <
• •
•*. 4
;• .i- . • •
• • .•
< •
’ X-
V •I • •
I# •.
« I •
•. •
4 » •I
•5?^.
: /
• A '
f • .V *-*
... • ; •
#. ••• , > •.
• i
• *
V
* . *.•j 3
••A,
• •
. • • •
% I
'JwN..
*. . •.
•• j • •
• ■ /
!/' • '•
. 1 •
•• ^.% •••.'
i • ..
••
• ' • •
I
i
* •«•
V*»-.
» • . *. I - *
'. ‘1 .-
i*C V'«.t •
•• *.
*....
V •
N
* ** • '
<•
t
•«'• • •.••••
• .•
f •
% %V?.•v*.
"V>
• • i *1*
• • t
• •
• . •
* •t .•I
4*
• •
^ ft • A
#• •.
. •
• • •f
• «
V 4
'•^i -T • •
* *
I''.-
• •f*« •
• •
I • V V •
•rf.
i MM DATE 07/21/W IIENHEPXH COUNTY PnOPEW^^j^W^TION SYSTEH
BATCH Sftl
• •30 02-117-23 21 0002
PM^ ADDR ' 00000 SNim AVE
OMNER flWIE T E 0 J II _
TAXPAYER' .TIIOHAS E t JOANNE. II HTTCll
NANE/AODR 00 SNXTH AVE
, . NAYZATA NN B5301
PROP ADDR
OMNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADOR
30 02-117-23 21 0016
OOlis SMITH AVE
CRAIO IIERTZENBERO ETAL
CRAXO IIERTZENBERO
IIS SMITH AVE
NAYZATA MM 55301
• •
.30 02-117-23 21 0023
PROP AWlk 00060 ORONO ORCHARO RO S
OMNER NAME • OOOCLAS- E MIHTELEY ET AL
^AVIR . DOUGLAS E NIIZTELEV 0 '
SmE/AODR CLAUDIA MYERS:IIM1TEL1W
60 ORONO ORCHARO RO .
NAYZATA MM 55301
PROP ADDR
SO 02-117-23 21 0032
TAXPAYER- ■ peter S.OOSIIOARIAN
MAHE/ADDR AMY OOSIIOARIAH '
100 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
NAYZATA- MM 55391
• •
PROP AOOR
OMNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAHE/ADDR
'• • .
SB 02-117-23 22 0002
00015 ORONO ORCHARD RO S
P L SaiERER BOO SCHERER
PETER L t CERI 0 SCORER
19000 51ST PL H
PLYMOUTH MM SSA67
• •
\
- • PROP ADDR
' \ OMNER NAME
TAXPAYER
t NAME/ADDR
SO 02-117-23 22 0005
00265 ' ORONO-^ORCHARD.RD S
VILLAGE OF ORONO
.CITY OF ORONO
p O BOX 66
CRYSTAL DAY MM 55323
• •
30 02-117-23 21 0003 .
00060 SMITH AVE .
VIOLET H OLAMPE TRUSTEE
VIOLET H OLAMPE .
60 SMITH AVE ■ *
NAYZATA MH 55391
SO "02-117-23 21 0017
00125 SMITH AVE
B J 0 P J HORNER
BRADLEY J O PAMELA J HORNER
125 SMITH AVE
NAYZATA MH 55391
• •
SB 02-117-23 21 0026
00110 SMITH AVE
J -A FISK t J K FISK
JAMES A.0 JENNIFER K FISK
110 SHITN AVE
NAYZATA MH 55391
SO 02-117-23 21 0033
00120 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
LOUIS 0 MERCHANT 0 NXFE
LOUIS O MERCHANT
120 ORONO ORCHARD RO S
NAYZATA MM 55391
SO 02-117-23 22 0003
00030 • ADDRESS UNASSXCNED
CARGILL MAC HXLLAN JR ETAL
LONCRXOGE ASSOCIATES
P 0 BOX 9300 DEPT 20
MPLS MM 55690
SO 02-117-23 22 0000 .
00045 SMITH AVE
D N 1 H R MUST
DAVID N 0 HEIOX R MUST
.45 SMIlrtf AVE.
NAYZATA MM 55391
t. •
REPORT MO. PI435401
PAGE
30 02-117-23 21 0004
00000 ■ SMITH AVE
JANET A MCMILLAN
JANET A MCMILLAN
1274 TEALNOOD AVE
LONG LAKE NN 55356
30 02-117-23 21 0022 .
00110 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
J L NYFFELS 0 M J NYFFELS
JAMES L B MAUDE J NVFFEU
110 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
NAYZATA MM ' 55391
%
SB 02-117-23 21 0031 '
00095 SMITH AVE
J 0 D AHLBERO
JANES H 0 DIANNE R AHLBERO
95 SMITH AVE •
NAYZATA MM 55391
50 02-117-23 22 0001
00030 ADDRESS UNASSICNED
STATE OF MINN
STATE OF NINH IDNR)
CLUCE LINE TRAXLl
30 02-117-23 22'0004
00030 ADDRESS UNASSICNED
STATE OF HMH
STATE OP MINN CDMI)
tLUCE LINE TRAIL)
30 35-110-23 S3 OOH
00025 ORONO ORCHARD RD N
K J 0 t B SPENCER '
KEITM J 0 THERESA B SPENCER
25 ORONO ORCHARO RO N
LONO LAKE MN 55S56
• •
• * *
T
%
»•
•
i1
• •
. •
. \
‘ •I.
* *• **
. * ••
• •
• •rn
MM DATE *07/21/99
V-
IIENNEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORHATION SYSTEH
. PROPERTY OUNEKS LIST
BATCH SOI
• •
SO SS-llB-23 SS OOOS
PROP AMR 00038 . ‘ ADDRESS UNASSXCNED
OMNER NANE STATE OP HXNN •
TAXPAYER STATE OF'HXNN IDNRl.
NANE/ADDR. ILUCE LXNE TRAIL)
• • • •
38' 35-118-23 33 0009
OOOEO ORONO ORCIMRD RD N
OLD ORCHARD ‘FARH ILC
OLD ORCHARD FARH LLC
30 ORONO ORCHARD RD •
VAYZATA HH BS391 ■ ■
II
38 35-118-23 34 0002
00038 ADDRESS UNASSXCNED
OMNER .HAW STATE OF HXNN.
TAXPAYER STATE OF lONN IDNR)
CLUCE LXNE TRAIL)
PROP ADDR
WNER.NAK
TAXPAYER
NAHB/ADDR
TOTAL BATCH >501 00022
* •
9
• 9
•L.• •
L
*• •
• •
••• . •
• 1 • ••
/ •• •
C
L
*. •
REPORT NO. PX435401
PACE 2 I I
38 35-118-23 33 0010 .
00030 ORONO ORCHARD RD N
J L nURPHY 8 S S SHXTH
JANES HURPHY 8 SANDRA SHXTH
SO ORONO ORCHARD RD N
HAYZATA HH S5S91
,'f^
• \
t •
• •
L
X CERTXFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AM TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATXON AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE IH5NHEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION# TO THE BEST
OF HY KNOWLEDCE AND BELIEF.
I DATE
L
ft #. t
t
• •
• r
» •
L .* •
. . X
• L. •.
V
> •
••
• I
•
• • . ••
• »
• •-8 . .1
• 0
Oon
meeting
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: 9/8/99
5fP I J ,9yj,
ITEM NO.• \r
Department Approval:
Name Paul Weinberger
Title Zoning Administrator/Planner
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2512 Alan and Marilyn Richie
905 Tonkawa Road
Class III Preliminary Plat Subdivision-Public Hearing
Zoning District:LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 Acre minimum lot
size. Sewered
Comprehensive Plan:Urban Service/Urban Residential
Site Area:6.3 Acres
Proposal:3 Lot Lakeshore Residential Development (Single Family)
Exhibits:
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Application
Plat map
Property Owner's list
Reduced Survey
City Engineer report
Resolution No. 3317 - Vacating Sewer Easement
Sanitary Sewer Map
Summary of Request
Erotas Building Corporation (applicant) has an interest in property located at 905 Tonkawa Road,
owned by Alan and Marilyn Richie. The applicant has requested a three lot subdivision of a 6.3 acre
lot. Proposed three lots would be located on North Arm of Lake Minnetonka and have access from
Tonkawa Road.
As shown on the property survey (Attached Exhibit D) the lot is developed as a single residential site
with a tennis court, driveway and paved walk to the lake. Applicant has indicated all existing
structures and hardcover will be removed from the property. It has been several years since the
property has been used for residential purposes.
'1
Pertinent Ordinances:
Section 11.03, Definition 66(C) 2/3 - SuMivision classified as a Class III Subdivision
Section 10.24, Subdivision 5(B) - Lot Standards
Required lot area = 1 acre
Lot 1 = 1.81 acres
Lot 2 = 2.35 acres
Lot 3 = 2.14 acres
Section 10.02, Definition 43(B) - Lot width for lakeshore lots
Required = 140’
Lot 1 = 197
Lot 2 = 200'
Lot 3 = 191 ’
Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1 and 2) - Allowed
hardcover
Lot History
A previous applicant had proposed a two lot subdivision with Zoning Application #1818 and
received preliminary approval by the City Council. This plan included preserving the existing house
and associated hardcover on the lot. Following application for final plat the applicant requested the
subdivision be withdrawn. The one year time period for preliminary plat approval has expired.
PARCEL INFORMATION
Property Identification:
The subdivision includes the following parcel:
08-117-23 21 0012
Legal Description:
Lots 1,2 and 3, Block 1, Vasa Park
.!
• t
Conformity to Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Standards:
Lots within the LR-IB zoning district require a minimum of 1 acre dry buildable area and 140' of
width at the lakeshore. The proposed lots are as follows:
LOT INFORMATION
The subdivision is proposed as 3 lots on 6.3 acres.
Block 1 Dry Acres Total Acres
Loti 1.81 acres 1.81 acres
Lot 2 2.35 acres 2.35 acres
Lot 3 2.14 acres 2.14 acres
* No designated wetlands are located on the property
Each lot exceeds minimum standards for lot width and size, and appears to demonstrate suitable
building sites.
Surrounding Properties
Surrounding properties are zoned LR-IB (one acre residential). The locality is primarily lakeshore
lots that fix>nt on either Stubbs Bay, Maxwell Bay or North Arm of Lake Minnetonka. The proposed
use and development of the three lots would be consistent with the character of the Tonkawa Area.
ZONING
The parcel is zoned LR-IB, Lakeshore Residential District. The minimum lot area requirement is
one (1) acre. The minimum setback requirements are noted below:
Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Lakeshore Side Yard
1 acre 140'35'75'10'
Access
Access to the three lots would be via private driveways to Tonkawa Road. Driveway permits are
required from Hennepin County for additional curb-cuts along County right-of-way. The applicant
shall obtain necessary permits prior to final plat approval.
Sewer
Property was assessed for 3 units in 1976 as part of the 73-1 sewer project. Sanitary sewer to serve
Lots 1 and 2 should be provided sanitary service from Tonkawa Road. The existing sewer on
Tonkawa Road east of Lot 1 should be extended southerly approximately 100-200 feet to serve Lot
2. Sewer connection for Lot 3 is located over the southwestern portion of the property.
« •
Bluff Impact Zone
A bluff spans the entire lakeshore of the property. Structures are required to meet a 30’ top of bluff
setback. This setback has the greatest impact on proposed Lot 3. Permanent erosion control
measures shall be in place should the paved walk to Lake Minnetonka be removed. If the property
owners intend to regrade as a result of hardcover removal they are required to apply to the City for
a Conditional Use Permit.
Easements
Standard drainage and utility easements along the property lines shall be dedicated on the final plat
10' along the street property line and 5' along interior lot lines.
Park Dedication Fee
8% of the land value, to be determined by the City Assessor following preliminary approval, will be
required for Park Dedication Fee.
Drainage
The City Engineer has stated in his comments dated August 9,1999, the draft version of the City’s
Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan shows that the site lies within the Stubbs Bay
drainage district. The site drains to the south and the north from the high point on Lot 2. All
ultimately reach North Arm. The bluff area along the lake and the existing topography of the site
will ponding difiicult. At a minimum we would recommend creating a vegetated buffer strip
along the top of the bluff to provide some water quality benefits. Final plans should be submitted
to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their review.
Staff has submitted the preliminary plans to the Watershed District however the District has not
completed their review as of the date of this report.
IssuM for discussion
1.
2.
The property is developed as a single residential site with a tennis court, driveway and paved
walk to the lake. The applicant has stated his intention to remove all structures and
hardcover prior to final plat approval. The City Engineer has indicated erosion control
measures shall be in place immediately following removal of hardcover on the property.
All three lots have demonstrated they do meet the zoning district requirements and appear
to demonstrate suitable building sites within required setbacks.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
All the lots meet the zoning district requirements for developments in the LR-IB zoning district.
Staff is recommending preliminary plat approval of the application based on the following
conditions:
1.
2.
Site Grading and Erosion Control plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
Applicant shall obtain a permit from Hennepin County Department of Transportation for
additional curb-cuts and access to Lots 1,2 and 3.
3.Engineering plans shall be completed for the extension of sanitary sewer service to the
property by a registered engineer to the specifications set by the City Engineer and Director
of Public Services. Plans shall be approved by the City prior to final plat approval.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
To approve or amend the enclosed resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for Erotas Building
Corp.
rn,m.
I
i
i
I
A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF A CLASS III SUBDIVISION LOCATED
AT 905 TONKAWA ROAD
FOR ALAN AND MARILYN RICHIE
FILE NO. 2512
WHEREAS, Alan Richie and Marilyn Richie (hereinafter the "subdividers") on July
21, 1999, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a three (3) lot
residential plat of property legally described as:
Lots 1,2 and 3, Vasa Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the Municipal Code of Ordinances, Chapter 10 (Zoning Code) and
Chapter 11 (Subdivision), the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 16,
1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the
opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, on September 13, 1999 the Orono City Council considered the
subdivision application, noting the following findings of fact:
1.The property is located within the LR-IB One Family Rural Residential Zoning
District requiring a minimum of one acre of contiguous dry buildable land within
each newly created lot.
2.
3.
The entire site is approximately 6.3 acres.
The proposed plat consists of three (3) residential lots each meeting or exceeding the
one (1) acre minimum requirement for the zoning district.
4.All lots exceed lot standards for lot width and lot area, and have demonstrated
adequate building sites.
Page 1 of 5
8.
9.
11.
• •
5. All lots shall have direct access to Tonkawa Road (County Road No. 135).
6. All existing hardcover will be removed by the subdividers upon completion of the
final plat.
7. Setbacks for structures is 35 ’ front yard and 10' side yard.
The draft version of the City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan shows
that the site lies within the Stubbs Bay drainage district. The site drains to the south
and the north from the high point on Lot 2. All flows ultimately reach North Arm.
The bluff area along the lake and the existing topography of the site will make
ponding difficult.
A vegetated buffer strip along the top of the bluff is necessary to provide water
quality benefit's to Lake Minnetonka.
10. Hennepin County shall grant access permits for access to Tonkawa Road.
The property was assessed for 3 units in 1976 as part of the 73-1 sewer project.
Sanitary sewer to serve Lots 1 and 2 should be provided sanitary service from
Tonkawa Road. The existing sewer on Tonkawa Road east of Lot 1 should be
extended southerly approximately 100-200 feet to serve Lot 2. Sewer connection for
Lot 3 is located over the southwestern portion of the property.
12. A bluff spans the entire lakeshore of the property. Structures are required to meet a
30' top of bluff setback. This setback has the greatest impact on proposed Lot 3.
13. Any alteration within the bluff impact zone shown on the preliminary plat shall
require further Planning Commission and City Council review.
14. The Planning Commission reviewed the application on August 16, 1999 and
recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0 to approve the three lot subdivision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the
findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for
Page 2 of 5
-#
r •
'>
Alan Richie and Marilyn Richie, legally described above per preliminary plat drawings by Mark S.
Gronberg, a licensed surveyor of Coffin & Gronberg, Ii.c. dated July 15,1999, revised September
8,1999 subject to the following conditions:
1.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Subdividers submit a Grading and Erosion control plan for the entire site to be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
2. Subdivider shall obtain a permit from Hennepin County Department of
Transportation for new curb-cut and access to Lots 1,2 and 3.
Plans shall be completed for the extension of sanitary sewer service to the property
by a registered engineer to the specifications set by the City Engineer and Director
of Public Services. Development plans shall be approved by the City prior to final
plat approval.
Lots 1,2 and 3 shall each have direct private access to Tonkawa Road (County Road
135).
No building permits will be issued until the structures and hardcover is removed from
Lots 2 and 3 and erosion control measures are in place and approved by the City
Engineer.
Sanitary sewer to serve Lot 3 exists west of the existing home along the south
property line. Lots 1 and 2 should be provided sanitary service from Tonkawa Road.
The existing sewer line on Tonkawa Road east of Lot 1 shall be extended southerly
to serve Lot 2. Detailed plans shall be provided to the City for review and approval
by the City Engineer and Director of Public Services prior to final plat. Tonkawa
Road is a County Road, final plans shall be provided to Hennepin County for review.
The developer shall grant Drainage and Utility easements 5 feet wide along all
interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along the right-of-way.
Subdivider is hereby advised that the City will not grant final plat approval until the
MCWD has £q>proved all grading and drainage improvements for the property.
10. Payment of Park Dedication Fee for two (2) new residential lots per City Ordinance.
Page 3 of 5
4
11. Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval \vill expire one
year from the date of Council preliminary plat approval. Should the subdivider fail
to file a final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the
subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application vsith the City.
12. Subdivider is hereby advised any changes with the layout of lots shall require further
review by the City Planning Commission and City Council.
FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS
The following list of final submittals shall be submitted to the City two (2) weeks prior to
the regularly scheduled City Council meeting:
1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) no u.. copies and one (1) copy reduced
to r'=200'. Drawing to include:
A. Lot lines per survey by Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. dated July 15,1999 revised
September 8,1999.
B. Designation on the plat of all drainage and utility easements.
2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required:
A. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others
with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other
documents affected by such interest.
B. The applicant shall provide certified copies of all recorded easements
currently affecting the property.
C. Signed and executed Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit for sanitary
sewer extension and improvements.
D. Completed application for private road name.
E.Vegetated buffer drainage easement including a mj^ defining said easements
for the property located within the top of bluff setback.
Page 4 of 5
L
3. FEES TO BE PAID:
A. Final plat fee: $200.00.
B. Legal review and filing fee: $200.00.
C. Park Dedication Fee 2 new lots x $4,900 = $9,800.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting
held this 13th day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13 th day of September
1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 5 of 5
A
Application # ^ ^ ^
Date Received" 7/z//^ 9
Amount Paid
CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site address ____^OS ^OAc
Property Identification Number (PID) ~23
Please check one - Property ____abstract or X torrens?
Attach legal description to application.
lars
DiWT Ou/aJeIL
Name JCN/ € AtJniL*fA^——
Address HSO /JitrurtoFT AC^a
City /jJA'fZirA ^ MpJ
Phone (home) C
Zip J7J7/Phone (work)
/^OPL/CAA)-f
[ifdiflferent than applicant) jn^ssr ^ ^ ^
(^UlL-OW^ ^—
Address ST» __________Phone (home). JT=^
City Ct> >_
(attach list if more than one)
Zip 5C3T3/3 Phone (work) VT7-<^3Z ^
EXISTING LAND USE
Number of Tax Parcels
Development Size
Present use (check)
Present Zoning District
PROPOSAL
/
6.3^
AA’IA
Acres Dry Land
Acres Wet Land
Acres Total, all parcels
Residential; no. of units
Other (specify)_____
Division for Tax Purposes
Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites)
Subdivision for New Building Sites
Number of BuUding Sites / Existing Units
Z New Units
3 Total Units
Proposed Gross Density ^ • — Units per Acres
Minimum Lot Size ’ VJ. _ Sq. Ft. Dry Biddable Land
Proposed Use (check) __X-------Residential
Other (specify)
/
Hz)/
117-A3- 3 y 'm o«
j
x:
X
(3) \ /
AUO,
v,,j:
/ ^ (10)
(7)5^vr
'•Tj
F#'**®*0rr?i)i:':\/T317
**’'• '*®-«j*4---*:*
A R T I M SM Q 0
)i
!■''' ?*;•?•&-«■,is
•••••■
■'•'WO,
\
/ %>
'<sS
21? 94
d
%'.‘.V'.V
« « • « % IV»‘.v.v
(13)
'1^.
02-mY3-^L (15)
>\
1
117. n
y;»r:ri
J *** •*.•**’•* V
s*“* ■' •••■'l ^ ^ lor •
(2)
M'"
f MT V tffV r
r rupi,
" •
RUN DATE *7/15/99
DATCH SIS
PROP ADOR
OMNER NAME
.TAXPAYER
NANE/AODR
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY ONNERS LIST
36 *5-117-23 39 *013 '
**675 PARTENMOOO LA
J P 6 E K BECHOOL
JOHN P I ELIZABETH X BECHOOL
675 PARTENMOOO LA
LONG LAKE HN 5535*
36 *6-117-23 12 ****
*099* PARTENMOOO RD
BRUCE 6 MARY ENOELSNA
BRUCE I MARY ENOELSNA
99* PARTENMOOO RO
LONG LAKE NN 5535*
REPORT NO. P14S54*!
PACE 1*
36 06-117-23 21 ***1
*06*1 TONKAMA RD
E A OANZIOER t J L OANZIOER
ERIC A 6 JENNIFER L OANZIOER
6*1 TONKAMA RD
LONG LAKE MN 5535*
i '
PROP ADOR
OMNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NANE/AODR
36 *6-117-23 21 6**2 '
6*625 TONKAMA RO
J E NOORE 6 L B NOORE
JOHN E 6 LOURDES B NOORE
9551 LAKE HARRIET PKMY E
NPLS NN 559*9
36 06-117-23 21 0**3
**697 TONKAMA RD
J P SPOONER I K B SPOONER
J P SPOONER I K B SPOONER
1365 ORONO LA
MAYZATA NN 55391
38 06-117-23 21 *007
0*93* PARTENMOOO RD
NALAND C I JO ELLE L HURR
NALAND 6 JO ELLEN HURR
93* PARTENMOOO ROAD
LONG LAKE NN 5535*
J
• • . ‘
■ t.
PROP ADOR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/AOOR
PROP AODR
OMNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NANE/ADOR
36 *6-117-23 21 6*1*
6*925 PARTENMOOO RO
JIN SAFAR
JACK I NARY SAFAR
925 PARTENMOOO ROAD
LONO LAKE NN 5535* '
36 06-117-23 21 *013
00935 TONKAMA RD
MILLIAN J HCLELLAN ETAL
MILLIAN J NCLELLAN
935 TONKAMA ROAD
LONO LAKE HN 5535*
36 *6-117-23 21 *611
0*036 ADDRESS UNASSICNED
J W SAFAR I N SAFAR
JACK SAFAR
925 PARTENMOOO RO
LONG LiUCE HN 5535*
36 06-117-23 21 0*19
**955 TONKAMA RD
JAN GILBERT
JANES H 6 NARY N GILBERT
955 TONKAMA RD
LONG LAKE NN 5535*
36 *6-117-23 21 *012
*•9*5 TONKAMA RD
A P RICHIE I H A RICHIE
A P RICHIE I H A RICHIE
95* HIGHCROFT RO
MAYZATA NN 55391
36 *6-117-23 21 6*17
6*9*6 PARTENMOOO RD
GARY M B JEANNE N KRINNEL
GARY M 6 JEANNE N KRINNEL
9*6 PARTENMOOO RD
LONO LAKE NN 5535*
PROP ADOR
OMNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NANE/AODR
TOTAL BATCH 515 6**12
• • ,,
J I
o
I
'CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY AND
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR
ALAN AND MARILYN mCHE
OF LOTS 1, 2, St 3, BLOCK 1, VASA PARK
\
\
V
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
\ /
'* BUILDING___
'SETBACK-' \X P,\'>
/
I ^
I /
1/ <*'
»;««v,
V.'^a ^,A i
DC.lD«V,rN X 'v Vx \ . Vn
//
/\V-/J 1 ,'
/
N
IP- / / / / ' ^ * ^)V > '
\
j
\V
\
«
\ \
M/te".990 \
\^ \ '\ X-o^'V
A
:'VP \
\\ ;\\ ,SURVEY\ X
VW\v \ /At' ' ' ' ' line ^ y$IV\\ A \ \ \ ^'
C^\v V
V<K.y^N \
ly V X VX
\
X-
<5 existing ^'
/
✓
VV\ \ ^ _• f n -
N
\\
HOUSE ^
(TO ■ «MOVCD)
\
\
V^./4f'
s-o—y // i-s\r-k ^
'//i'////y \ (
\
y
cHi*^
^'yQy ^
\\ •• ^Qr-A*'"» A V
\
■A ' X a \
3^-\\\v-sf5r-r:—- y^- ~~ r ^
N
■>// /EXISTWC LEGAL DESCRPTION
I .
Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderhk and Associates. Inc. is an Afftrrrtauve Action/Equal Opportunity Employer
Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. PE. • Joseph C. AnderUk. P.E. • Marvin L Sor/ala. PE. •
Glenn R. Cook. PE. • Robert G. Schunicht. PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. •
Robert W Rosene. PE.. Richard E. Turner. RE and Susan M. Eberiin. C.PA.. Senior Consultants
Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PE. • Keith A. Gordon. P.£. • Robert R. Pfefferle, PE. •
Richard W. Foster. PE. • David O. Loskota. P£. • Robert C. Russek. A.I.A. • Mark A. Hanson. PE. •
Michael T. Rautmann. PE. • Ted K.Fleld. PE. • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolfs. P£. •
Sidney P. Williamson PE.. L S. • Robert F. Kotsmith • Agnes M. R:ng • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE.
Offices: St Paul. Rochester. Willmar and St Cloud, MN • M.hwaukce. Wl
Engineers & Architects
August 9,1999
WeOsite: www bonestroo.com
Mr. Paul Weinberger
Assistant Zoning Administrator
City of Orono
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Re:Richie 3-Lot Subdivision
BRA File No. 139-2512
Dear Paul:
We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed three-lot subdivision for Alan and Marilyn Richie.
The site is located on the west side of Hennepin County Road No. 135 (Tonkawa Road) just north of the
Partenwood Road intersection in the northwest quarter of Section 8. We have the following comments in
regards to engineering matters.
1. Access: Proposed access locations for Lots 1 and 2 should be shovra on the plans and submitted to
Hennepin County for their review.
2. Grading: A grading and erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review.
Removing the existing bituminous/concrete walkway to the lake on Lot 3 will create an erosion concern.
This area should be restored immediately after the hardcover removal with fiber blanket and bale checks
or equivalent. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any grading or structure removal.
3. Drainage: The draft version of the City ’s Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shows
that the site lies within the Stubbs Bay drainage district. The site drains to the south and the north from
the high point on Lot 2. All flows ultimately reach North Arm. The bluff area along the lake and the
existing topography of the site will make ponding difficult At a minimum we would recommend creating
a vegetated buffer strip along the top of the bluff to provide some water quality benefits. Final plans
should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watersh; 1 Distr* ■ f 'r their review.
4. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer to serve Lot 3 the existing home along the south property
line. Lots 1 and 2 should be provided sanitary service from Tonkawa Road. The existing sanitary on
Tonkawa Road east of Lot 1 should be extended southerly approximately 100 feet to serve Lot 2. It is
unclear why there is an existing sanitary sewer easement shown across all of Lot 1 and part of Lot 2.
Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide
along the roadway right-of -way.
5. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we can prepare an estimate of the totd cost
for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required if the City so
desires.
Please contact me at (651) 604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Tom Kellogg
Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono
E
CITY of ORONO F
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. ^ ^
A RESOLUTION VACATING
A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT WITHIN THE PLAT OF
VASA PARK, SECTION 08, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23
IN THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA
FILE NO. 1849
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
^VHEREAS, on July 21, 1993 the Estates of Barbara B. Lund and Russell T.
Lund, Jr. filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of a sanitary sewer
easement originally dedicated in the plat of Vasa Park, legally described as follows:
The sanitary sewer easement shown on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, VASA PARK,
according to the recorded plat thereof.
^^T^EREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held
before the City Planning Commission on August 16, 1993, regarding said vacation and all
interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of the proposed vacation and the Council of the City of Orono finds that
said vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in consideration of the
following findings:
1.The City has not and does not intend to develop a municipal sewer line within the
20’ easement.
2.The location of the easement within the proposed building envelope of the
undeveloped lot will present problems with the future residential development of
the site and force development closer to lake.
3. The sanitary sewer easement as it exists serves no public purpose.
Page 1 of 2
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUnON OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of the Estates of Barbara
B. Lund and Russell T. Lund, Jr. is hereby granted and that the sewer easement legally
described above is hereby vacated.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular
meeting held on August 23, 1993.
Edward J. Caliban, Jr., Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of
August, 1993 by Edward J. Call?han, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the
City of Orono, a Minnesou municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf
of the City.
J.(/>
Notary Public
I' LINDA S. VEE
NOTARY PU8UC - MINNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTYatSFl HENNEPIN COUNTY ^ My commission ixplrss ^12-08
1 _______________ - - - - --------m m m
Page 2 of 2
J
• mm
i-'o C cOr' o>^
'■ fCERTIFlCATE OF SURVEY AND
PRELWINARV PLAT FOR
ALAN AND MARILYN •RICHIE
OF LOTS 1, 2, & 3, BLOCK 1, VASA PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
O : JmStM U
____tTO_____ me ««F
iMriiRf* ir« m nr *
TH« »#»tf W«n4» !• vm --- ^ ^ ^tM •• •• fltlhtf r«fc #Ke mi ^
««•« ■ oM •• «»w •» •»»« l.v *•*"*••
amni lie MJAft W MWI
' 40 IMMMt AVOU. M UK. IM S0M
, iia-iTS-iUI
------- I lODT eonrr imf «•
COFFIN & GftONBERG. Wa
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
I J (999
city OF o
DATE: 9/8/99
ITEM NO.= 7
Department Approval:
Name Paul Weinberger
Title Zoning Administrator/Planner
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description:
Zoning District:
#2526 James Deanovic
Final Plat of Jacobs Mill
RR-1 A, Single Family Rural Residential, 5 Acre minimum lot size.
Unsewered
Comprehensive Plan:
Site Area:
Rural Service/Rural Residential
46.75 Acres
Proposal:7 Lot Rural Residential Development (Single Family - 5 Acre)
Summary of Request
Jim Deanovic has requested final plat approval for Jacobs Mill. A copy of the proposed plat has
been attached to the draft resolution for your review. The City Council tq)proved the preliminary plat
for Jim Deanovic for property located on the west side of Stubbs Bay Road. Plat will consist of 7
lots in the RR-1 A Zoning District to be served by a private road located within Outlot A to be known
as 'Jacobs Mill Road'.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
All the lots meet the zoning district requirements for developments in the RR-1 A zoning district.
Staff is recommending approval of the application based on the conditions noted in the attached
resolution.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
To approve or amend the enclosed resolution approving the final plat of Jacobs Mill and naming the
private road within Outlot A 'Jacobs Mill Road'.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
PLAT OF JACOBS VIEW
FILE NO. 2526
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision
regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; tmd
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a
seven (7) lot residential development by James P. Deanovic and Deborah W. Deanovic (hereinafter
"the subdivider"); and
WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-1 A, 5
Acre Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District finding that each lot is of a size and
configuration that would allow its use for a single family residence to be fully developed; and
WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed or has agreed to complete all requirements
of the platting regulations of the City, including:
1.Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 4330, the resolution granting
preliminary approval of the Class III subdivision.
2.
3.
Dedication on the plat of standard perimeter drainage and utility easements.
Designation and dedication of drainage easements over the stormwater pond and
designated wetlands within the plat.
5.A Homeowners Association has been developed for ownership and maintenance of
the private road to be located within Outlot A and future road(s) to be located within
Outlots B and C. The Homeowners Association shall also be responsible for
maintenance of all stormwater facilities serving the subdivision.
Page 1 of 4
4
mm
6. Subdivider has granted to the City an underlying Road and Utilities Easement for
Outlots A, B and C.
7. The City Engineer and MCWD (Permit 99-169) has approved the grading and
drainage improvements on this property.
8. Creation of covenants for ail lots for protection of drainfield sites, including
protective language for alternate septic sites along with site plans locating both
primary and alternative sites, and alerting future property owners of the need to
protect sites on adjacent properties.
9. Execution of a Subdivider's Agreement providing for the installation of drainage and
stormwater facilities required as a condition of subdivision approval, and posting of
security to ensure that these required improvements are completed to the City's
satisfaction, the design of said improvements subject to approval of the City
Engineer.
10. A drainage easement has been granted to protect wetlands and ensure BMPs for the
buffer strips located within Lots 1,2 and 3, Block 2.
11 . Payment to the City for the final plat review fee and fee for legal review and filing
of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $400.00.
12. Payment to the City for park dedication fees for the creation of six (7) new lots in the
amount of $34,300.
13. The private road within Outlot A shall be known as Jacobs Mill Road.
Page 2 of 4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono
hereby approves the plat of Jacobs Mill, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following
conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
All identified primary and alternate sewage system drainfleld sites within the
subdivision shall be fenced off prior to any land alterations, and such fencing shall
remain in place until such time the individual'lot is developed and the City Septic
Inspector athorizes removal.
The stormwater improvements shall be constructed to City requirements, subject to
the Developers Agreement executed between the City and the developer. Drainage
and stormwater improvement construction can begin as soon as the final plans have
been formally approved by the City Engineer and the Developers Agreement has
been executed.
No building permits shall be issued until the stormwater management improvements
have been completed and road is constructed by the developer and approved by the
City Engineer and Director of Public Services.
Prior to City release of the plat for filing, applicant shall provide evidence of fee
ownership of the property in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, and applicant
shall meet any other title requirements as may be required by the City Attorney.
Applicant shall provide all documents noted in this resolution in a format
acceptable to the City Attorney prior to release of the plat for filing, and shall
complete all conditions to the satisfaction of City staff, prior to release of the plat for
filing.
The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin
County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before March 13,2000
together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the
easements and covenants noted above.
Page 3 of 4
A
■ —II
mw'w
a
The £^proval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date
specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono
for subdivision review. Dated this 13th day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 1 3th day of September, 1999
by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 4
Tr-Jifi \ V
« V
*V •—-€
III / I
i
• mtm
f •it
i
t
• I
T)RAF'i
CITY OF ORONO
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
DEVELOPER ’S AGREEMENT FOR
Jacobs Mill
(Name of Development)
James P. Dcanovic and Deborah W. Deanovic
(Name of Developer)
THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of
1999 by and between the City of Orono, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the
State of Minnesota (hereinafter called "City"), md Mid-US Properties Limited Partnership its heirs,
successors and assigns, (hereinafter called "Developer").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Developer has made application to the City Council for approval
of a final plat of land within the corporate limits of the City legally described in Exhibit A attached
hereto and incoporated herein by reference (the "Subdivision"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has granted approval for such development on the
condition that the Developer enter into this agreement to provide for the installation of
improvements hereinafter described on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises
and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agree:! as follows:
Initials of Developer
Initials of City Clerk
Page 1 of 7
i
d
1, Property Description: The Property is legally described as set forth in Exhibit A, and is to be
replatted into Lots 1 through 4, Block 1 and Lots 1 through 3, Block 2,
2. Improvements: In accordance with the policies and ordinances of the City, the following
described public or private improvements (hereinafter collectively called the "Improvements") shall
be constructed and installed on the terms and conditions hereinafter contained:
A. Site grading, including all necessary erosion control procedures (hereinafter called
"site grading improvements");
B. Street grading, graveling and stabilizing (hereinafter called "street improvements")*
C. Storm sewers, including all necessary culverts, catch basins, ponds, inlets, channel
improvements, and other appurtenances thereinafter called "storm sewer improvements");
D. Permanent street surfacing (hereinafter called "permanent street improvements");
E. Standard street name signs at all newly opened intersections and such other traffic
control signs within the Subdivision to be installed only by the City (hereinafter called
"traffic signing improvements");
F. Entrance monuments, signage and landscaping including boulevard sodding, seeding,
berms, and plantings (hereinafter called "landscaping improvements");
G. Underground gas, electric, cable and telephone service to be arranged by Subdivider
with the utility companies involved (hereinafter called "utility improvements"); and
3. Constructjon Plans: The following described detailed plans and specifications for the complete
installation of the Improvements shall be submitted by the Developer for the approval of the City
prior to tii£ start of construction. The Plans and specifications shall conform to all cuirrent City
standar-^ for all applicable work.
Initials of Subdivider
Initials of City Clerk
Page 2 of 7
'4
4. Construction of Improvements:
A. Commencement Date - The constru.tion of Improvements shall begin no later than
September 30. 1999 .
B. Completion Date - All Improvements, with the exception of bituminous wearcourse shall
be completed no later than September 30. 2000 .
C. Contractors - The Developer shall select, retain and supervise the Contractor(s)
responsible for Improvement construction. The City reserves the right to require satisfactory
proof of successful experience and adequate financial status of any such contractor. Where
required by City ordinance, the contractor shall first obtain a license from the City.
D. Preconstruction Conference - Prior to the start of any construction, the Developer and
the Developer's Contractor shall meet with the responsible City official to review
construction plans and schedules.
E. Permits - Prior to the start of any construction, the Developer's Contractor shall apply
for and receive all necessary permits from the City and/or government agencies having
jurisdiction.
F. Construction - The constaiction, installation and materials shall be in accordance with
the plans and specifications approved by the City.
G. Insurance - The Developer will cause each person who constructs and installs any
Improvement to maintain complete insurance coverage including Workmen's Compensation,
Liability and Property Damage.
5. Performance Deposit: For the purposes of assuring to the City that the Improvements will
be completed according to the terms of this agreement, and that the Developer will pay all claims
for work done and materials and supplies furnished, the Developer has deposited with the City at
the time of the execution of this agreement an irrevocable letter of credit in a form satisfactory to
the City providing that the City is able to draw upon such letter of credit in its sole discretion to
complete the Improvements if the Developer fails to satisfactorily complete the work prior to the
completion date specified in Section 4 above. The amount of such deposit shall not be reduced
before substantial completion of the Improvements. The letter of credit shall expire no sooner than
September 30, 2000.
Initials of Subdivider
Initials of City Clerk
Page 3 of 7
6. Fees and Expenses: The Developer agrees to pay all City fees required per the current City
Fee Schedule and further agrees to completely reimburse the City for all the variable additional
expenses it incurs in regard to the review and approval of the Improvements including, but not
limited to, direct City payroll and overhead, costs, and fees paid to consultants and other
professionals.
7 Resolutions of Citv: Developer agrees to be bound by the provisions set forth in all
resolutions of the City Council approving the Development.
8. Rinding Effect: The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding
deemed covenants running with the land. References herein to Developer, if there be more than
one, shall mean each and all of them. This agreement to be executed by the Developer, shall be
placed of record so as to give notice hereof to subsequent purchasers and encumbrancers of all or
any part of the subdivision and all recording fees, if any, shall be paid by the Developer.
•
9. Notices: Whenever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand
be given or served by either party to this agreement to or on the other party, such notice or demand
shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States certified mail (return receipt requested) to
the addresses set forth below. Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered
personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with th.e above.
Notice to Citv
City of Orono
C lerk/Administrator
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Notice to Developer
James P. Deanovic and Deborah W. Deanovic
Peter Andrea Company
770 Equitable Drive #203
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
10. Incorporation hv Reference: All plans, special provisions, proposals, specifications and
contracts for the Improvements furnished and let pursuant to this agreeemnt shall be and hereby are
made a part of this agreement by reference as fully as if set out herein in full.
11 . Disclaimer bv Citv U is understood and agreed that the City, the City Council, and the
agents and employees of th^^. City shall not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to the
Developer or Developer's contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, laborers, or any other person,
firm or corporation, for any debt, claim, demand, damages, actions, or causes of action of any kind
or character, arising out of or by reason of the execution of this agreement or the performance and
completion of the Improvements.
Initials of Subdivider ________
Initials of City Clerk ________
Page 4 of 7
12. Hold Harmless and inHemnification: The Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the
City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City from and against all claims,
daises, losses or expenses, including attorney fees, which the City, City Council and agents and
employees of the City may suffer or for which it may be held liable, arising out of or resulting
from the assertion against them of any claims, debts or obligations in consequence of the
performance of this agreement by the Developer, its employees, agents or subcontractors, whether
or not caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder.
13, Remedy for TVfaiilt! Default by the Developer of any of the terms of this agreement shall
automatically result in the suspension or withholding of all permits, licenses, occupancy certificates
or other authorizations issued by the City in connection with the property- included in this
development.
A. The Developer hereby grants to the City, its agents and its employees, the right to enter
on the property for the specific purpose of constructing or completing any and all of the
agreed upon Improvements should the Developer not complete those Improvements by the
date specified in Section 4>B.
B. The remedies afforded to the City under this Section shall be in addition to any other
remedies to which the City may be entitled by law or other agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Subdivider have caused this agreement to
be duly executed on the day and year first above written.
CITY OF ORONO
By:.By:
(City Clerk)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
day ofThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this ____
, 19 ___by Gabrial Jabhour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk
of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on
behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Initials of Subdi\ider
Initials of City Clerk
Page 5 of 7
DEVELOPER
By:.And:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199 before me a
Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
ST/.fE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this______day of_________________, 199 _, before me a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared
__________________________________________________known to me to be the person(s)
described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed
the same as his (their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Reviewed for Administration:
Date:By:
(City Official)
Initials of Subdivider
Initials of City Clerk
Page 6 of 7
I
VH
i
"V
This document has been drafted by:
City of Orono
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323
Initials of Subdivider
Initials of City Clerk
Page 7 of 7
i
V:
.u
EXHIBIT A
The Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 118 North Range
23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, except the South 260 feet of the East 310 feet thereof,
also except that part of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter which lies
northeasterly of the following described line; Commencing at the Northeast comer of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence south along the East line of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 426 feet to the point of beginning
of the line being described; thence westerly, deflecting right 103 degrees 20 minutes a
distance of 560 feet; thence northerly to a point in the North line of said Southeast Quarter
of the Northwest Quarter distant 730.04 feet west of said Northeast comer as measured along
said North line, and said line there ending.
ALSO that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lying West of the East 730
feet thereof, and lying southerly of the southwesterly right-of-way line of the Burlington
Northern Railway, (formerly the Great Northern Railway), Section 32, Township 118 North,
Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian.
h
»r
n
“5 i
— *»fTS--------' '•
1
1 V
• *<0 ' '> «
J i‘» lOTWMPf »«J> SiJ’*'*^**^ * *2
; /f ■ FF M FJ M m7i
• fr ' *
,:l.
o >
Ilf
iNP!
f-
I
1r
I
Control No.
CITY OF ORONO
PRIVATE ROADWAY REQUEST
A.
B.
C.
D.
The subject of this request Is:
an existing private roadway.
u pro()sed private roadway which Is to be created as a
condition of pending subdivision approval..
The owner(s) of this Private Roadway and/or all abutting property
will be (are) the owner(s) of the following described property:
The above owner(s) hereby request that this Private Roadway be
known by the following name:
Choice No. ^2;;
Choice No. 3^ v/^^/55 A-OAi) •
(List three choices in order of preference. The C^.ty Council will
approve a name provided no conflict exists with existing names or
naming policy. If all names have a conflict, you will be asked to
make new choices. The approved name will be used for all mailing
address and official Identification purposes.)
The above owner(s) hereby request the CJ.ty of Orono to Install the
following standard street and traffic signs and said owner(s) hereby
agree to reimburse the City for all costs of said installation.
(Such signing may be required as part of a separate Developer's
Agreement and/or subdivision request.)
standard city street name slgn(s) - number required
standard "STOP" sign(s) - number required _ _ _ _ _
standard traffic slgn(s) described below:
number required
The above owner(s) do hereby acknowledge the (future) existence of
said private road, and that the City of Orono has no obligation to
maintain or service said private road, and that the City of Orono
does not Intend to acquire or open said private road as a public
Date
Date
'■* *
\
CITYofORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 4 3 3 0
A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELEVILNARY
APPROVAL OF A CLASS HI SUBDIVISION LOCATED
AT 555 STUBBS BAY ROAD
FOR PETER ANDREA CO.
FILE NO. 2479
WHEREAS, Peter Andrea Co. (hereinafter the "subdivider") on March 17, 1999,
filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a seven (7) lot residential plat
of property legally described as:
The Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 118 North Range
23 West of the 5 th Principal Meridian, except the South 260 feet of the East 310 feet thereof,
also except that part of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter which lies
northeasterly of the following described line; Commencing at the Northeast comer of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence south along the East line of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 426 feet to the point of beginning
of the line being described; thence westerly, deflecting right 103 degrees 20 minutes a
distance of 560 feet; thence northerly to a point in the North line of said Southeast Quarter
of the Northwest Quarter distant 730.04 feet west of said Northeast comer as measured along
said North line, and said line there ending.
ALSO that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter l>dng West of the East 730
feet thereof, and lying southerly of the southwesterly ri^t-of-way line of the Burlington
Northern Railway, (formerly the Great Northern Railway), Section 32, Township 118 North,
Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian.
(hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the Municipal Code of Ordinances, Chapter 10 (Zoning Code) and
Chapter 11 (Subdi\ision), the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 19, 1999,
May 17, 1999 and July 19, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this
application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
Page 1 of 8
4
r
111 CITYof ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 4
WHEREAS, on August 9,1999 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision
application, noting the following findings of fact:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The property is located within the RR-IA One Family Rural Residential Zoning
District requiring a minimum of five acres of contiguous dry buildable land within
each newly created lot.
The entire site is appro>dmately 46.75 acres, with 4.39 acres as designated wetland
and 39.21 acres dry buildable, excluding land dedicated to right-of-way.
The proposed plat consists of seven (7) residential lots each meeting or exceeding
the five (5) acre minimum requirement for the zoning district.
All lots meet lot standards for lot width and lot area, and have demonstrated adequate
building sites.
Lot 1, block 1 will be accessed through a private drive noted on the plat ps Outlot
C. A temporary drive to serve Lot 1, Block 1 will be located in Outlot B until the
private road is developed in Outlot B to serve properties to the west.
The front lot line for Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2 is the
common boundary with Outlot A, the private road outlot.
Lot 4, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2 are located adjacent to Stubbs Bay Road. The side
yard adjacent to the street for Lot 4, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2 has an established
setback of 50'. These two lots shall not have any direct access to Stubbs Bay Road.
Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1. 2 and 3, Block 2 shall be served by a private
road designated on the plat ar Outlot A.
Lot 1, Block 1 is subjea to a future land dedication for a Highway 12/County Road
6 interchange. Current plans indicate the total land dedication may involve just
under 4 acres of land. The resulting lot would be 5.16 acres in area, still meeting the
required 5.0 acre minimum lot size. It appears the lot would allow for a buildable
site within the proposed setbacks with some grading.
Page 2 of 8
oT o\
ll:l
CITYofORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 4S ?jO
10.
11.
12.
14.
15.
16.
Lots 2 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 3, Block 2 are defined as comer lots which do
require a 100' side yard adjacent to street setbacks. Lot 2, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block
2 are showing setbacks of 50' adjacent to a street. This change shall be shown on
future surveys at 100'. The lots do demonstrate suitable building sites with the
increased setbacks.
The proposed private road to be constructed in Outlot A is 1100' in length. This
length exceeds the 1000' allowed for roads ending in a cul-de-sac. A variance is
granted allowing the road to exceed the 1000' allowed by code based on the cul-de-
sac being developed as a temporary road. It is the intent to extend the private road
when access is required to the west. The platted Outlot A cul-de-sac (100') and road
(50') meet established standards for width in the Subdivision Ordinance.
Private residential streets serving seven units are required minimum paved width of
28* and the cul-de-sac is to be paved with a 40' radius. Construction standards are
established in the Subdivision Ordinance in Section 11.33, Subdivision 4. Drainage
and utility easements should be provided 5 feet along all interior lot lines and 10 feet
wide along all right-of-ways and along all perimeter lot lines.
13. The proposed location of the intersection with Stubbs Bay Road has been approved
by the Director of Public Services.
Two septic sites have been identified on each lot. The soil testing and plans
completed by Swedlund Septic Services has been reviewed by Staff and
conditionally approved, subject to applicant providing some additional informavion
as specified in the Septic Review report dated August 4, 1999.
A stormwater management NURP pond is proposed to be located on Lot 4, Block 1.
The area containing the pond shall not be included in the dry buildable area for the
lot. The final plat should designate the pond as a drainage easement and adjust the
lot area if necessary' to accommodate the NURP pond.
Orono designated wetiands are located over Lots 1,2 and 3, Block 2. A Flowage and
Conservation Easement is necessary to protect the wetlands from future development
and to preserve existing vegetation.
Page 3 of 8
J
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 4 8 -3 0--------
17.The City Engineer has recommended the establishment of vegetated buffer strips on
each lot to provide additional runoff filtration, since not all runoff from development
of the site will be treated by the stormwater pond.
18.The Planning Commission reviewed the application on July 19, 1999 and
recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0 to approve the seven lot subdivision of
land located at 555 Stubbs Bay Road.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the
findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat
for Peter Andrea Co. located at 555 Stubbs Bay Road, legally described above per preliminary plat
drawings by Mark S. Gronberg, a licensed surveyor of Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. dated May 13, 1999,
revised July 2, 1999 subject to the following conditions:
1 . A variance will be granted for the cul-de-sac to permit a temporary cul-de-sac 1 ,100
feet in length where 1,000 feet is allowed.
2.Lots 2,3 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2 shall access to the private road
in Outlot A. No direct access to Stubbs Bay Road shall be allowed for any Lot.
3.The private road in Outlot A shall be constructed to City private road requirements,
subject to a Developers Agreement to be executed between the City and the
developer. Private road construction can begin as soon as the engineering plans for
the road as well as stormwater management plans have been approved by the City
and the Developers Agreement has been executed.
4.Private road access shall be from Stubbs Bay Road subject to conditions for such
access to be approved by the Director of Public Services.
5.The private road shall be privately owmed and maintained per the appropriate access
easement/maintenance documents to be executed by the developer. The developer
shall create a homeowners association for such owmership and maintenance. The
homeowners association shall also be responsible for maintenance of all stormwater
facilities serving the subdivision, including the pond located over Lot 4, Block 1.
No building permits will be issued until the private road is completed and all
stormw'ater management improvements have been completed by the developer and
approved by the City.
Page 4 of8
CITYof ORONO
^ES»0%
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 4 3 3 0
7.
8.
9.
10.
12.
13.
14.
15.
The developer shall grant to the City an underlying Road and Utilities Easement for
Outlot A.
The developer shall grant Drainage and Utility easements 5 feet wide along all
interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along all right-of-ways and a'or.g perimeter lot
lines.
The subdivider shall provide screening along Outlot A and on the east side of Stubbs
Bay Road to create a visual barrier to minimize light pollution from automobiles
entering Stubbs Bay Road from Outlot A.
Subdivider shall plant boulevard trees along the private road per the requirements of
Section 11.60, Subdivision 2.
Subdivider shall dedicate on the final plat west 33' for right-of-way for Stubbs Bay
Road.
Subdivider shall construct stormwater management improvements to be shown on
the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan to be submitted with the final plat
application. A final Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan must be approved
by the City Engineer prior to final plat approval. Subdivider shall grant drainage
easements over all drainageways and stormwater ponds with the plat. Subdivider
shall provide supportive drainage calculations and define vegetated buffer strips
within each lot, such strips intended to provide additional filtration of runoff prior
to its leaving the site, and such strips to be maintained with grasses in an unmovved
state.
Subdivider is hereby advised that the City will not grant final plat approval until the
MCWD has approved all grading and drainage improvements for the property.
All identified primary and alternate sewage system drainfield sites within the
subdivision sh.all be fenced prior to any land alterations, and such fencing shall
remain in place until such time that each Lot is developed.
Subdivider shall develop covenants for each lot for protection of drainfield sites
within each Lot. Covenants shall include protection for alternate septic sites along
with site plans locating both primary and alternative sites. The covenant shall alert
future property owners of the need to protect identified sites.
Page 5 of 8
A hjj
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. _______________
16.Applicant shall submit additional testing on soils found to have a seasonal water table
at less than one foot due to eroded topsoil. Complete designs for the primary
drainfield sites on each lot must be submitted and approved prior to final plat
approval. Each drainfield site must be located on the survey to assure setbacks to
property lines, wetlands and the NURP pond. A berm or other protective measure
shall be designed into the sites which may be affected by the 100-year flood.
17. Payment of Park Dedication Fee for seven (7) new residential lots per City
OrdincUice.
18.Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire one
year from the date of Council preliminary plat approval. Should the subdivider fail
to file a final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the
subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City.
19.Subdivider is hereby advised any changes with the layout of lots and/or outlots shall
require frirther review by the City Planning Commission and City Council.
20.MnDot shall review the proposed plat relating to the ftiture right-of-way acquisition
for a Highway 12/County Road 6 interchange located on the north side of Lot 1,
Block 1.
FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS
The following list of final submittals shall be submitted to the City two (2) weeks prior to
the regularly scheduled City Council meeting:
1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced
to 1"=200'. Drawing to include:
A.Lot lines per survey by Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. dated May 13,1999, revised
July 2,1999.
B.Designation on the plat of all drainage easements, drainage and utility
easements, and wetland boundaries.
Page 6 of8
i
CITYof ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CIT^ COUNCIL
NO. 4 0______
2. LEGAL DOCUMEPO'S required:
A. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others
with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all oiner
documents affected by such interest.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
The applicant shall puvide certified copies of all recorded easements
currently affecting the property.
Signed and executed Drainage Easement over all drainageways, and
Conservation and Flowage Easement over all designated wetlands.
Signed and executed Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit.
Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over Outlets A, B and C
Signed and executed covenants defining responsibility for construction and
maintenance for Outlet A, defining future financial obligations.
G. Completed application for private road name,
H.Signed and executed covenants for protection of drainfield sites, inchiding a
map defining the location of the drainfield sites.
I. Vegetated buffer drainage easement including a map defining said easements,
3. FEES TO BE PAID:
A. Final plat fee: $200.00.
B. Legal review and filing fee: $200.00.
C. Park Dedication Fee 7 new lots x $4,900 = $34,300.
Page 7 of 8
O
j'i >;rt
CITYof ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 4 g 0
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting
held this 9th day of August, 1999.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabi^Jabbour, MayofS^
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
)
) ss,
)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of August
1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
a r ^
Notary Public
Page 8 of 8
Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderlik And Associates. Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equai Opportunity Employer
Principals: Otto G Bonestroo. PE • Joseph C Anderlik. PE • Marvin L Sorvala. PE •
Glenn R Cook PE • Robert G Schunicht, PE • Jerry A Bourdon. PE •
Robert W Rosene, PE . Richard E Turner. PE and Susan M Eberim. C PA . Senior Consultants
Associate PrirKtpals Howard A Sanford. PE • Keith A Gordon. PE. • Robert R Pfcfferie. PE. •
Richard W Foster. PE • David O Loskota. PE • Robert C Russek. A IA • Mark A Hanson. PE •
Michael T Rautmann. PE • Ted K Field. PE • Kenneth P Anderson. PE • Mark R Rolfs. PE •
Sidney P Williamson. PE. L S • Robert F. Koismiih • Agnes M Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE.
Offices: Si Paul. Rochester. Willmar and St Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl
WeOfite WWW bonestroo com
Septembers, 1999
Mr. Paul Weinberger
Assistant Zoning Administrator
City of Orono
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
I.’CO
Ui; 1
. . • •
■
Re: Peter Andrea Subdivision
File No. 139-2479
Dear Paul:
We have reviewed the preliminary grading and drainage plan, revised 7/2/99, for the proposed
seven-lot subdivision for the Peter Andrea Company. The site is located west of Stubbs Bay
Road North and south of TH 12 in the north half of Section 32. We have the following
comments in regards to engineering rnatters.
1. Access: The typical street section shown on the plans provides for a 24-foot wide paved
bituminous road. The proposed roadway will need to have a minimum paved width of 28
feet to meet City standards for a public or private street serving 7 or more units. Final plans
should provide street design including horizontal and vertical curve information.
Geotechnical recommendations should be provided to verify the proposed street section.
2. Grading: The grading plan should show silt fence around the proposed grading for the
buildi-.ig pads «. n Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 and Lot I, Block 2. All erosion control measures
should be in place prior to any grading. Additional erosion control will be needed during
construction of the houses and septic systems.
3. Drainage: The proposed outlet to the pond should include an outlet structure that provides 1
foot of skimming to remove floatables and debris. An outlet structure detail should be
provided with the final plans. The pond should have a rip rapped emergency overflow shown
at an elevation of 979.0. The pond should be graded so that flows are directed through the
overflow if the pond reaches 979.0. Vegetated buffer strips and corresponding easements
should be defined on the final plan set. Supporting drainage calculations for the buffer strips
should be provided for review. Final plans should be .submitted to the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District for their review.
4. Easements: Final platting should include 33 feet of dedicated right-of-way for Stubbs Bay
Road. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet wide along all interior lot
lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of -ways. Drainage easements should be
provided across all wetland, vegetated buffer strips, drainage ways and pond areas.
2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651*636-4600 ■ Fax; 651*636*1311
5. Financial Guarantee: We have estimated the final cost of site improvements at $121,650.
The cost estimate is attached for your review. A financial guarantee of 150 percent of this
estimate or $182,475 should be provided to the City.
Please contact me at (651) 604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, EMC.
Tom Kellogg
Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono
• *«
CITY OF ORONO
PETER ANDREA SUBDIVISION
RESIDENTIAL SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAT FILE NO. 2479
SITE IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE
ITEM UNIT
EST. UNIT
QUANTITY PRICE
EST.
COST
Mobilization LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000
Site grading, demolition and removal LS 1 20,000.00 20,000
Common Excavation CY 1500 6.00 9,000
Aggregate base. Cl. 5,100% crushed TN 2200 12.00 26,400
Geotextile fabric SY 4500 1.00 4,500
Type 41 bit. wear course TN 900 36.00 32,400
Bituminous tack GL 300 2.00 600
Pond excavation LS 1 5,000.00 5,000
RCP storm sewer LF 100 30.00 3,000
RCP apron w/trashguard EA 3 600.00 1,800
Outlet control structure EA 1 2,000.00 2,0Cw
Rip rap. Cl. 3 CY 20 50.00 1,000
Silt fence LF 1500 3.00 4,500
Seeding with 4” topsoil AC 4.3 1.500.00
6,450
Estimated Construction Cost
+50% Security Deposit
Total Security Deposit Required
2479PETER ANDREA.xls
$121,650
60.825
$182,475
SEP-03-1999 09:57 MlhttEHAHA CREEK IJATEPSHED 6124710332 =. 02.06
MCWD PERMIT APPLICATION: 99-169 REPORT DATE:
Applicant: Peter Andrea Co,Repre.senfative: Coffin & Gronbere
7700 Equitable Dr. #203 482 Tamarack Ave.
l^den Pfairic. MN 55344 Long Lake, MN 55356
Location: 555 Stubbs Bav Rd.. Orono Subwatershed: U-10
PID: 32-118-23 SubSubwatershed:
Annlicnhle Rules: Rule B. Erosion Control Rule N, Stormwater Manaecruent
Rule D. Wetland Protection
Exhibits Received: Site clans Runoff calculations
Preliminarv citv apDroval
Applicarion Received: Auuusl 5. 1999 Application Complete: August 27. 1999
Kotiein^ Requirements: Mailed to residents w7in 600 ’ of project on: August 30.1999
Wetland Conservation Act Notice mailed on: __
Reviewed by: Andrevv SjTcrson, Jim Hafner
Project Review’ Status by Other Governnieiitfll Units:
DNR General Permit:
Rc\iew & Summary: This project proposes 7 family residential units on about 45 acres in
the City of Orono. An access road ending in a cul de sac will be constructed. Water qudit>- criteria
for the site will be met partially through a wet retention pond sized for the total hard surface of the
site and constructed to meet NURP standards. The pond v\ill pick up drainage from about 85 to
90% of tlic road and runoff IVom the front yards and driveways of four of the houses. The rrrrainder
of the road drains in the opposite direction from the pond and a rain garden is proposed to provide
treatment in addition to the grassv’ area over which the runoff will drain. Rale control is net for the
development, A pond maintenance agreement has been provided. No phosphorous fcrti.izers will
be used on the site and will be a condition of the restrictive covenants.
Wetlands are present on the site but the proposed development will not impact any of them. The
required wetland biitfcrs are provided and are called out on the site plans.
Appropriate erosion control measures will be implemented as detailed on the site plans.
Recommendations: Approve
SEP-08-1999 09:53 Mlh^MEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED 61247106SI P.OZ^CS
Rule .TFees'**: Staff S 50.00
Etigrs S S2.20
Legal
Mailing costs: S 33.14
Total to date: S13S.34
* Rule J fees cannnt he collected from public agencies. Fees listed in tliis rqaort mav not be the
final total incurred for the application.
'.‘2
Application Date:
Completion Date:
120 Day Deadline:
3/17/99
3/17/99
Extended to 9/12/99
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: 8/5/99
ITEM NO.
Department Approval:
Name Paul Weinberger
Title Zoning Administrator/Planner
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: ##2479 Peter Andrea Co. (Jim Deanovic)
"555" Stubbs Bay Road North
Class III Preliminary Plat Subdivision
Zoning District:
Comprehensive Plan:
Site Area:
Proposal:
RR-1 A, Single Family Rural Residential, 5 Acre minimum lot size,
Unsewered
Rural Service/Rural Residential
46.75 Acres
7 Lot Rural Residential Development (Single Family - 5 Acre)
Exhibits:
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
Application
Plat map
Property Owner’s list
Reduced Survey
City Engineer report
Assessor's calculation for park dedication
January 19,1999 minutes from sketch plan
Planning Commission Minutes - April 19, 1999
Planning Commission Minutes - May 17, 1999
Septic report memo
April Planning Report
PARCEL INFORMATION
Property Identiflcation:
The subdivision includes the following parcel(s):
32-118-23-24-0007
Summary of Request
Peter Andrea Co. is proposing a seven lot subdivision for property located at "555" Stubbs Bay Road
North. The developer has addressed most of the issues previously discussed by the Planning
Commission. Access to the seven lots would be via a private road shown on the survey as Outlot
A which is proposed to intersect Stubbs Bay Road to the east. The issue of the provision of future
access to lots to the west is through Outlot B. Preliminary Septic Reports have been reviewed and
conditionally approved by Steve Weckman. Mr. Weckman has commented additional design work
shall be completed prior to final approval.
Conformity to Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Standards
The proposed subdivision creates a rural residential development ol 5+ acre lots serv'ed by private
septic systems and individual wells. The proposed development is not included in the Met Council
designated service area to allow for the provision of sanitary sewer. Municipal water is not
available.
Surrounding Properties
Property to the north, south and west is zoned RR-1A (5 acre minimum lot size). The properties to
the east, across Stubbs Bay Road are zoned RR-IB (2 acre minimum lot size). The proposed
subdivision is in keeping w ith general character of the neighborhood.
Lot Layout and Lot Standards
Each lot meets or exceeds the 5.0 acre minimum lot standard for the RR-1 A district. All lots also
demonstrate they do meet the required lot width at the defined front yard setback.
Resulting from the topography of the site and wetlands many of the lots are irregular in size and
shape, however each lot appears to demonstrate a suitable building site within the required setbacks
and allow for a primary and alternate septic site. The suneyor has depicted the required setbacks
On the survey most revised on 7/2/99.
Lot 1, Block 1 is proposed at 9.12 acres is size. This lot is subject to a future land dedication for a
Highway 12/County Road 6 interchange. Current plans indicate the total "taking" will involve just
under 4 acres of land. The resulting lot would be 5.16 acres in area, still meeting the required 5.0
acre minimum lot size. It appears the lot would allow for a buildable site within the proposed
setbacks with some grading.
Lots 2 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 3, Block 2 are defined as comer lots which do require a 100 ’
side yard adjacent to street setbacks. Lot 2, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 are showing setbacks of 50'
adjacent to a street. This change shall be shown on future surv'cys at 100'. The lots do demonstrate
suitable building sites with the increased setbacks.
Outlot A is intended to be a private road held by the Homeowners Association. The Homeowners
Association shall be created by the subdivider. The Association will be responsible for the
maintenance of the private road. The Outlot is platted at 1,100 feet in length. The Code allows a
maximum of 1,000 feet for cul-de-sacs. The road is being platted with the intent to extend the road
when access is required to the west. Thus, the cul-de-sac could be considered temporary.
The future extension of the cul-de-sac is shown as Outlot B. Outlot B is platted providing future
access to properties located to the west of the development. The Orono Subdivision Code requires
property ^ing subdivided to provide for future access when determined necessary. The subdivider
will only develop the road as a cul-de-sac within Outlot A. Lot 1, Block 1 will have access via a
private drive through Outlot B and Outlot C. Outlot C may not be required to be platted separately,
but shall have an easement dedicated to the City as a future road easement.
LOT INFORMATION
The subdivision is proposed as 7 lots on 46.75 acres,
Block 1 Dry Acres Total Acres
Lot 1 9.12 acres 9.12 acres
Lot 2 5.00 acres 5.00 (non-Orono wetland)
Lot 3 5.00 acres south of right-of-
way
5.00 (non-Orono wetland)
Lot 4 5.01 acres 5.20 acres
Block 2
Lot 1 5.00 acres 5.38 acres
Lot 2 5.08 acres 6.58 acres
Lots 5.00 acres 7.32 acres
ZONING
The parcel is zoned RR-1 A, Rural Residential District. The minimum lot area requirement is five
(5) acres. The minimum setback requirements are noted below;
Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side
Adjacent to
Street
5 acres, dry
buildable
300’100'100'50'100’
Wetland Setback Tree Planting
No building, excavation, grading or filling is allowed in or within 26' of the wetlands. The wetland
setback will apply to Lots 1,2 and 3, Block 2.
The Subdivision Code requires trees to be planted along the private road. The locations of those
trees shall be shown on the final landscaping plan.
Septic
The minimum setback requirements for septic systems is 75' from wetlands, water supply wells and
stormwater ponds.
The sites have been c6fiditionally approved by Steve Weckman. Some additional data regarding the
system design and location of soil borings will be required prior to Council approval.
Access
The proposed plat shows a private road as Outlot A. The private road would be located off Stubbs
Bay Road and end in a cul-de-sac. Our Subdivision Code requires roads to be platted through
assuming it will be necessary for future connections to land locked parcels. To be consistent with
the intent of the Code it is required the subdivider plat access outlets for future road extensions to
the West. The proposed interchange for Highway 12 and County Road 6 will make access from the
North difficult if not impossible.
An adjacent property owner was concerned about the impact of the private road in relation to her
property to the east. The concern was headlights from vehicles entering Stubbs Bay Road projecting
light onto the property. There is a stand of evergreens between the residence and the road. ITie
subdivider shall work with the property owner to develop a suitable plan to eliminate this concern.
The proposed roadway will need to have a minimum paved width of 28' to meet City standards for
a private street serving 7 or more units. The proposed temporary cul-de-sac will exceed the 1000'
standard. The plan shows the road at approximately 1100’. The road shall be platted as a through
street and developed as such in the future for access to the west.
The City Engineer shall review geotechnical recommendations and street design, including
horizontd and vertical curve standards. This information shall be required before the City Council's
review.
Easements
1.
2.
3.
A 27' road easement (Outlot C) is located along the west property line of proposed Lots 1 and
2, Block 1. Outlot C will not developed as a street until the time access to the west becomes
necessary. Outlot C will provide driveway access to Lot 1, Block 1. The driveway shall be
located 5' from either property line.
Standard drainage and utility easements along the property lines will be required for the final
plat.
Subdivider shall grant Conservation and Flowage easements across the wetlands located
within the development. Language in the easement documents shall restrict land alteration
and removal of vegetation.
Park Dedication Fee
Seven (7) new residential lots x $4,900 = $34,300.
Drainage
The City Engineer has stated in the attached Engineer's Report the draft version of the City's
Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shows that the site lies within two major
drainage districts. The northerly and southerly portions of the site flow to the west and lie within
the Painters Creek drainage district. Engineer's recommendation is final plans should include water
quality provisions for storm water leaving the northerly and southerly portions of the site. A
drainage area map, storm sewer and ponding calculations should be provided with the final plans.
Issues for discussion
1.
2.
3.
4.
The proposed access to Lot 1, Block 1 is via Outlot B and an easement platted 27'. In the
future it may become necessary to develop a road for future access to the west.
The City Engineer has indicated this property is located within 3 separate drainage districts.
The plan only indicates one stormwater pond. Is more ponding necessary?
Park dedication fee shall be equivalent of 8% of the value of the lot.
Is the proposed lot layout acceptable?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
All the lots meet the zoning district requirements for developments in the RR-IA zoning district.
Suiffis recommending approval of the application based on the conditions noted in the attached draft
resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote to:
Approve the preliminary plat based on all lots meet the zoning district requirements for residential
developments in the RR-1A zoning district.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
To approve or amend the enclosed resolution.
1
TO;Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator
FROM: Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager
DATE:August 4, 1999
SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2479, Peter Andrea - Final Plat
The proposed seven lot subdivision includes septic system testing and design for two drainfields on
each lot. The drainfield sites meet all City and State Regulations.
Each new lot has been tested by Swedlund Septic Ser\ices to confirm the presence of suitable
original soils adequate for two five bedroom drainfield sites. These drainfield sites are located on
slopes less than 6 percent and meet all City and State Regulations. The Plat includes the
identification of many non-Orono wetlands and all drainfield sites meet the required 75 feet from
all type 3 wetlands.
Based on the above information, staff would recommend approval of the application. The City
requires that all drainfield sites be fenced off prior to any grading or land alteration on the property.
^^Ncii Meeting
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION •5fP / J
DATE; Septemfe'^r^vA8P9
ITEM NO.: 2
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappa
Title Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Engineer’s Report
Item Description: No Parking Signs on Shadywood Road North of Narrows Bridge
Introduction
This issue was previously discussed at the June 28th Council meeting, and the Council passed a
resolution to install "No Parking" signs along Shadywood Road north of the Narrows channel
Bridge. Since Hennepin County installed the signs, we have received several letters from owners
of Pheasant Lawn Dock Lots with concerns about the impact of no parking restrictions on their
lots. At the August 23rd Council meeting, staff was directed to notify the area residents and bring
this issue to the Council for additional consideration.
Summary of Issue
Attached you will find a letter from a resident on Shadywood Road, north of the Lake Minnetonka
Narrows Bridge, requesting the installation of "No Parking" signs. Cars parking along the wide
shoulder in this area are creating a traffic safety hazard. Residents have also stated that most of
the problems are from users of the Pheasant Lawn Joint Dock complex as dock users are parking
along County Road 19. The dock lots are 20 wide lakeshore lots, without a house, that contain
a dock. These lots were originally created in the 1950’s.
The dock lots are non-conforming to current City zoning regulations that prohibit accessory
structures on lots that do not contain a principal structure. These lots were created in the 1950's.
Over the years there have been many discussions concerning these dock lots. In the early 1980’s,
the Council went through a process to formalize the existence of these dock lots by issuing
Conditional Use Permits. I have attached a resolution for one of these lots for your review. The
resolutions provided one parking spot per dock on small lots between the dock lots and the County
Highway. The access to these parking areas is difficult and there is limited room for moving past
parked cars. Because of the limited off road parking, the dock lot owners have been parking
along Shadywood Road. There is only one parking space available per dock, with the extra cars
parking along the highway. Over the past several years this has become a problem, as more cars
from the dock users are parking along County Road 19.
We reviewed this situation and agreed that there are safety concerns with vehicles parked along
the road, I have attached a copy of the letter received describing the safety concerns. The main
problem is that the residents of the area use the shoulder of the road as a deceleration lane when
they enter their driveways. Without being able to use the shoulder as a decelj ration lane, the
turning vehicles slow down on the highway causing a safety concern as other veh' les attempt to
pass the turning vehicles. This is a problem because of the limited sight distance for vehicles
crossing the Narrows Channel bridge.
Previous Council Action
The previous staff recommendation was for the installation of No Parking signs for the entire wide
shoulder area of north of the bridge. This was a conservative approach to provide for increased
traffic safety. The Orono Police Chief supported the installation of No Parking signs in this area.
This issue was discussed with Hennepin County The County also recognized that a safety hazard
exists and would install "No Parking" signs if requested by the City. A copy of the resolution
approved by the Council on June 28th is attached.
Options for Council Consideration
The first option is for the Council to not take any action and the previous resolution ordering the
installation of No Parking signs in the entire wide shoulder area north of the Narrows Channel
bride will remain in effect.
We have studied this issue further and developed a modified No Parking scenario for Council
consideration. The first solution to post the entire wide shoulder area for No Parking was a
conservative approach. This revised proposal would still keep No Parking restrictions inplace for
I the entire northbound side of Shadywood Road. This is necessary to provide a deceleration lane
for vehicles entering the driveways along this side of Shadywood Road.
On the southbound side, the beginning of the No Parking area could be moved 100 feet south to
( provide space for parking of five cars in the dock lot area. This would provide 120 feet of space
to used as a deceleration lane for vehicles turning into the driveway. This should provide adequate
stopping distance for a vehicle speed of 30 mph when entering the deceleration lane.
The attached map also shows the MNDOT recommended "Stopping Sight Distance" (SSD)
required. This is the distance required for driver traveling at a certain speed to recognize a hazard
in the road and safely stop the vehicle. The SSD contains two components - the distance the
vehicle travels during the drivers perception and reaction time, and the braking distance required
to safely stop the vehicle. Based on the results of many studies, 2.5 seconds is used for the driver ’s
perception/reaction time between when a hazard is spotted and the brakes are applied. The speed
limit is 40 mph. At 40 mph the recommended SSD is 315 feet. Also shown is the SSD for 50 mph
to account for vehicles that may be exceeding the posted speed limit. The site distance for vehicles
coming over the bridge is limited, which provides insufficient time for traffic to react to vehicles
attempting to pass turning vehicles.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Consideration of options for the No Parking restrictions along Shadywood Road, County Road 19,
in the area north of the Narrows Channel Bridge.
\
V«lir
929.6
"^^ti;istp iiixLihac-m^diiytM
*•.
X 998.2
^0' LAME F 12.5
50 MflA S\dm
\ tt\iikiic£
X 948.5 1^1
\
951 ..1
C
Exul'Mo nesoDj
is fOR Kid PARXili^
»M IMlIMAREk
i
100
C««l0«r l«ltf *•! 2'
NWl/4 SEC. 2
T117N.R23W
HENNEPIN COUN
FOR
STOfPIUd £I£HT
DiS\ KUL^49,500 tt
OroAO#* Minncdo
0*tt «f PK«t0fr«»Hf* 11*1'
HC‘>IZONS. If^
AERIAL flAPPlNC PROFESSION
i«»i4 C*«v. to t/fOt*JlS« • It0ttj«-
oouia iti«s • itiiiti
HORIZOMS* FILE 3-F2C
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.4 -^ ■.
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO
PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON
SHADYWOOD ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 19)
TEDS RESOLUTION, passed this 28th day of June, 1999^ by the City of Orono in
Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City ,
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has jurisdiction over County Road 19, also known
as Shadywood Road; and
WHEREAS the "City" and Hennepin County have concern regarding traffic safety
caused by vehicles parking in turning lanes on County Road 19 north of the Lake Minnetonka
Narrows Bridge; and
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED, that the * City requests
that Hennepin Coun^ install and mamtain "No Parking" signs on both sides of County Road 19
Shadywood Road, on the north side of the Lake Minnetonka Narrows Bndge m the vtcmity of the
right turning lanes.
Adopted by the City Councd of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a tegular meeting held June
28,1999.
Gabrrcl Jabbour,
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee. City Clerk
j'ldA-
A REVISED RESOLUTION RELATING TO
PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON
SHADYWOOD ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 19)
THIS RESOLUTION, passed this 13th day of September, 1999, by the City of
Orono in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the
"City", WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has jurisdiction over County Road 19, also known
as Shadywood Road; and
WHEREAS, the "City" and Hennepin County have concerns regarding traffic safety
caused by vehicles parking in wide shoulder/tuming lanes on County Road 19 north of the Lake
Minnetonka Narrows Bridge; and
r
WHEREAS, on June 28, 1999 the City Council approved resolution No. 4316
requesting that Hennepin County install and maintain "No Parking signs on both sides of County'
Road 19, Shadywood Road, on the north side of the Lake Minnetonka Narrows Bridge for the entire
length of the wide shoulder/tuming lanes.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED, that the "City" requests
that Hennepin County revise the "No Parking" signs that have been installed on both sides of County
Road 19, Shadywood Road, on the north side of Lake Minnetonka Narrows Bridge. The "No
Parking" signs along the northbound side of the road will remain in place to restrict parking along
the entire wide shoulder/tuming lane. The "No Parking" signs along the southbound side of the road
will be revised to begin the "No Parking" area 100 feet south of the beginning of the wide
shoulder/tuming lanes to provide for parking along the first 100 feet of this area.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held
September 13, 1999.
Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
• 0*1
r*r:-.'p'VC2 j
City of OR'M imi
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.1846 - B
TVV\C()l P-!,s. p^\L\:\Kii(
A RESMjrPION GRANTING
A CONDITIofiMi USE PERMIT PER
mdni ^^al zoning code
SECTION i0.03, SPBpJCyiSION 5
PILE (|970J
tO\L OWE CAt
WHEREAS, Paul R. Nutt (hereinafter "the applicant") is
an owner of one of the properties located at 2739 Shadywood Road
within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally des
cribed as Tracts 0 s P, Registered Land Survey No. 415 (herein
after "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a
conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03,
Subdivision 5 A through J to permit the continued use of the
oroperty as a legal non-conforming use and, specifically, per
Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (J) seelcs a variance to Section
10.24, Subdivision 4 (A) to allow an accessory structure (dock)
on a property that is unable to sustain a principal structure.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Orono, Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #941.
2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family
Lakeshore Residential Zoning District.
3. On August 19, 1985 the Orono Planning Commission re
viewed this application as proposed and recommended approval
based on the following findings:
A) Per Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 (J):
"Where, however, such a situation existed legally under
the prior applicable law, the Council will not
unreasonably require strict compliance an wi
generally look with favor on granting of a variance...
The substandard tracts were created prior
municipal zoning and controls in February of 1955.
B) The Orono Council minutes of 1958 and a newspaper
article published in the Minnetonka Harold in t^^t same
year confirm that f.City was aware of the existence
and use of accessory docks by non-adjacent owners.
Page 1 of 4
cuy of o||»
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COlMO
NO.1846 - B
C) The propertj^7»afe ‘^5ubdivid in the mid 50*s without
the benefit of^'•^l'’o§^tfco^.trols, is a unique situation
requiring spec^^lS^sideration.
D) The limited Tile of these tracts as proposed by the
City will not create hazards to the public safety.
E) The property/ because of physical constraints^
cannot be put to any other reasonable residential use
but for limited dock use.
4. The City Council has considered this application
including the findings and recommendations of the Planning
Commission, reports by staff and comments by the applicant
and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use
permit to allow continued use of the property as a riparian
lot with an accessory dock r.ot to be detrimental to the
health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not
adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other
danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate
surrounding property values ar.d that the proposed level of
use of the property will be ir. keeping with the intent and
objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono
City Council hereby grants a conditional use perit per Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 5 to permit the continued
use of an accessory dock on a property that cannot sustain a
principal structure thereby establishing a legal non-conforming
use of the property, subject to the follov^ing conditions:
1. Applicant/owner is limited to the mooring of one boat at
zero lot line dock.
2. Tract P shall be used for the parking of one car by
applicant/owner.
3. The existing dock at Tract O measures 42 feet in length
and 3 feet in width. The applicant must file a conditional
use permit with the City if a.", increase in the length of tue
dock is considered at some future date.
Page 2 of 4
___J-/
City of OROI^q^i HIS BEEH
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
NO. 1846 - B
m
4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of
the zoning code/ shall*automatically terminate any authority
granted herein/ and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
5. The undersigned applicant has read/ understood and here
by agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of
himself/ his heirs/ successors and assigns/ hereby agrees to
the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of
the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of
CtiRV)\<\
Page ? of 4
• -1- •
Juae 22.1999 ju;i 2 3 1599
r Cr.'Of iOOWV
Mr. Greg Gappa
City of Oroao
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Greg:
I am following up on your conversation with Dick Ogle regarding the parking and safety
situation on the stretch of County Road 19/Shadywood Road, just north of the Narrows Bridge in
Orono. I am writing on behalf of a group of Orono neighbors that live in the immediate area.
There is currently a very significant safety risk on County Road 19, in the area indicated on the
attached map. Unless something is done, we believe its just a matter of time before a very
serious accident will happen in this area.
As background, many years ago when the last major work was done on County Road 19, one of
the residents in our area, General Rawlings, worked with the city and/or county to widen the road
on both sides of County Road 19 on the northern side of the Narrows. The objective was to
provide a deceleration lane so cars turning into the driveways on either side of 19 could get out
of traffic, pull over safely, slow down and exit safely without disrupting traffic flow on 19. This
was necessary because the approach to 19 is a hill and you can see cars for less than 100 yards
from the entrance to the driveways.
The deceleration lanes work well since they give people plenty of time to pull over and slow
down without disrupting traffic flow on County Road 19. Early on, parking on 19 was not a
problem, but over the past few years parking has become a problem in the deceleration lanes on
both sides of the road. There are frequendy cars parked along both sides of 19 and sometimes
overnight or all weekend.
When cars are parked along County Road 19 we are not able to safely get over and slow down to
make a turn. Cars are forced to either stop on 19 before turning or slow down primanly on
County Road 19 before turning. In either case, generally the cars behind pull across the center
lane to get around the car turning, leaving less than 100 yards of clear visibility before the
Narrows bridge. Cars coming north on County Road 19 are generally accelerating comirig over
the Narrows Bridge because they know the speed lirrit goes up to 40 on the north side of the
t . idge. This creates a situadon where cars are speeding up coming over the bridge going
towards cars that arc speeding up to pass cars turning off County Road 19. Cars are accelerating
towards each other with limited visibility in essendally the same lane!
A__
• • • •
As residents of the area, we see how well the deceleration lanes work when they are clear and
usable. We have also seen the extreme danger created when cars are parked in the deceleration
lane, forcing us to turn directly off of 19. We have all witnessed “near misses” and do not want
to see a serious accident or worse resulting from the parking problem.
Parking was never intended for this section of County Road 19 and we would like to respectfully
ask that the city permanently and officially designate the area as no parking. That designation
will eliminate a major safety problem and provide peace of mind to the homeowners in the
immediate area.
Thank you very much for your prompt attention to this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
immerman (2745 Shadywood Rd.) on behalf of the homeowners on the north side of the
arrows Bridge
r
I
Donald R. Miegel
683 Sullivan Drive
Colxnnbia Heights, MN 55421
R2cr;:3D
AUG 1 7 1999
C\TY Or CnOI>iO
August 15,1999
City Council City Of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
RE: Resolution 4316
Dear Council
I petition the Council to reconsider its action as to resolution 4316 on
6/28/99 no parking on Shadywood Road North of the Narrows Bridge. As the
property owner of tracks Q & RI feel you have created a hardship for me.
I’m limited to one car on my property by the conditional use permit while
other property in the area is not. I believe there to be adequate room for
parking and right turn lanes in the area.
I started parking bn the street per the request of a few of the property
owners on the south end, as they felt I was damaging the slip road by driving
on it, even through I ha ve the ri^t to do so. Your reconsideration in this
matter would be very helpful in restoring my faith in the theory of Due
Process.
Sincerely;
Donald R. Miegel
Orono/ County Road 19
No Parking Restrictions in the Narrows Bridge Vicinity
We the residents in the Narrows Bridge vicinity of County Road 19 strongly urge the
Orono City Council to maintain the No-Parking signage and restrictions currently in
place. It is a vital issue of safety. When parking was allowed, we witnessed and experi
enced a number of near miss accidents between cars as well as cars and bicyclists.
The major points that support the No-Parking restrictions are as follows:
1. The widened shoulders on both sides of the Narrows Bridge were intended as deceler
ation and turn lanes so residents could safely pull over and slow down to turn into drive
ways and service roads. A former resident (General Rawlings) worked with the county
to have the turn lanes added to the road plan. See attached pictures of turn lanes on the
Tonka Bay side of Narrows Bridge. The width and space allocated on both sides of the
bridge is equal. The new construction on Highway 15 in Orono also clearly provides
turn lanes and No-Parking restrictions in a situation very similar to ours.
2. Turn lanes are critical because there is a very short distance on both sides of the
Narrows Bridge from driveways and service roads to the bridge. Cars coming in both
directions can’t see over the bridge. Also the speed limit increases from 35 on the Tonka
Bay side to 40 on the Orono side, therefore, cars coming over the bridge into Orono are
accelerating as they come up and over the bridge.
3. County Road 19 is also designated as a Bike Trail, meaning that adequate space needs
to be provided for bikes to safely travel on the shoulder. The bike trail is heavily used
with frequent large groups of cyclists and bike racers (who often travel at a relatively
good rate of speed).
4. Cars parked on the shoulder of County Road 19 create a subs'iantial risk for car acci
dents and car/bicycle accidents. When cars are parked in the tun: lanes (see attached
photos), residents turning into driveways must brake hard from 40 miles per hour to turn
into driveways. This creates substantial potential to get rear ended from cars traveling
behind. Cars also frequently pull out into the other lane of traffic to get around cars
turning into driveways. There is only roughly 30 yards of visibility to the top of the
bridge creating a substantial risk of head on collision from cars coming the other way,
particularly since they’re accelerating because of the 40 mile per hour speed limit on the
Orono side of the bridge.
5. With cars parked on the shoulder there is not adequate space for bikes to travel with
out riding in the traffic lanes. Also, with cars parked on the shoulder it is difficult, if not
impossible, to see bicycles coming when you are pulling out of the driveways.
Particularly with the frequent bicycle racers that travel in groups of 5-20 or more there is
a serious problem. Cars parked on the shoulder block the view of cars turning onto
County Road 19 form the driveway where cyclists have to stay close to the parked cars
allowing them to be seen only at the last minute requiring split second decisions. There
have been numerous close calls where bicyclists have had to swerve well out into traffic
lanes at the last second to avoid being hit by cars pulling out of the driveway that could
n’t see them. Had there been a car in the traffic lane, it’s likely one or the other of the
cars would have hit the cyclist.
6. It’s our understanding that virtually all county roads in the area are No-Parking.
County Road 19 is No-Parking from Hwy 7 to the Narrows Bridge and County Road 15
is No-Parking from County Road 19 to Hwy 394. For consistency sake we believe our
section of County Road should be treated exactly the same as others in the area. They’re
No-Parking for safety’s sake and we have at least equal the safety needs on our stretch of
County Road 19.
7. Lastly, there is no need for parking on County Road 19. There is a service road that
runs in front of the boat slips along County Road 19. There is room to park one car in
front of each boat slip. When the issue came up when non-residents purchased some of
the boat slips, the issue was addressed at an Orono City Council Meeting. It was decid
ed that non-resident slip owners would have the right to park one car on the service road
If they had guests that came in other cars they were to park in areas such as Excelsior
Spring Park where public parking was available. It was decided that no cars were to be
allowed to park on County Road 19. Jean Maybeth worked on this resolution for the
city.
We feel that the facts, common sense and the need for safety clearly support the need to
maintain the current No-Parking, and we respectfully ask that the city keep the parking
ban in place.
m
■ 'W . *
.IV- L- il' -''
jt;;-.v>,’>:,.'-.vi:.?--
•t^!
h^jSrV :>-. ■-.'»V*'..fc\l?^-l-.?.S.s-;>'KljLj-
^ r. .
■ <
• ‘'I • ' • < ‘'. - «'
. ‘ r»' ■ ^
fc ■** % *’
• * • •• >
■^ - « •
i - V ’
m f
A*-;:..
V. ,
•.’ ■ i i
‘ •* > »' • V
* ' i‘ ' •"*'
. r.
t’jkty
;•
■■■>^
I.If
L -'-J-
■^■-
rc.?
L:-‘^ T>'-
«»«>■. I!r
■■V.vi
•
.»»
■ '>•
. • i
■" *» ^
• »
(Pimm I n 2 ct 4) r^arkiny on County Road 19 n\ikc> it \er> dan:,*'
below were taken on 7/31 99 and are typical of summer weeke":
parked tor 2 days or loniier
.s to safely exit and enter mad Pictures
arkine levels. Cars are also frequently
:. ^'1
?r-r't:r''.‘, '. Y
3sa»3f^*'
. ** •
" '
t * •
,V*-t “. r,. .. ^ •iv ; -. . '.
■ V-r;T^
•• * ■
‘ -H - - -:.v?
•1
'•** ^ *>r **i •*•. iT-C '**»' • '
•i.v-i:-^iii ,.r ,. ■ • ^v '•■ . 't .-
Lm&J
W^V‘ - :•-
wfr-V^v •
K'^r—
i - ' ■ ' ''
f-' ■'*'• •* 'V^ •;.J «..'r.,^i-; .
r-^«YiT-tc=>
-^-.nl .
1
i- ■■
--;i
*.-•.':' ’ "."’■;’y
}, i-r-'j r, r _Jt'- ■ :■‘; ' ' :•A a -
• -V •' .'
• /V' ■" ■'■
•i-. •*■‘•‘'1
_____
^ • t 4Vj
Y' . • «rC»"^
zsik
‘t;:V3fk:
3) Providing a 5-foot bike zone with
parked cars puts cyclists well out into
traffic per picture 1. Also, parked cars
prevent cyclists from being seen until
the last minute for cars pulling out
from driveways.
PM mm-".
- i -
*• *
I . ‘ .
r"
Ui^iuy>.c
g%'ii .•^?•;
■^'BB . -
WwM
.......
K.'S>:
*'•. s.
■• *- ■ ,r
mm^m w^.
fca^‘
. * —
,\ •
r
.•^'-. ■
•^Mku 7• . •*
-........ -
. • - • * •'T -yv^’
• % -'iT-:.- ':5^a&:-t;
• *•’ .'.. ■/ .
rv' - - ‘ . -■■• ■ -
. .-. - i •. • . »V.
. * , ■ *V.
■ V-
■A%^
V
1.
-\
' ■ V /
t' ‘
■ ' r.C ■-• ■..‘"'^'Ui
—• - --^ :vi:A.-r:-3^
.'■•••ir!'.~-vr...
F’hotos
3^’.*> ««> /• •• 7 *
W iJcr.cJ .-\reas o\ RiuJ on both sides ot Narro\NS Bridge intended a> deeeleraiior. and turr
are ot T nka Ba\ side ot Narrovvs Bridge
. .e>
5>':
9'.
* J" ^ ‘ »‘ i
•-?>v i;7' ••,M--» .
-iT?! *":,.• ► .•■.
'>"7f
xi-fj ■•ivrtv
■i* •* • ‘iSS^^i ■ '4^'
si; fr -T^X.
Lj . , ^ .
l^liS
Td:ag^A x\N' TX/
• y .' .i?C'Xi:i o.\-y
•'r'ST^i..-
0M• ■ ■ ‘-T-^T >'
1^
EEGIN j hgr
iPvMnf 4 C'^nrmucJ I ^pccJ htv. * :nvTC.i''CN from 35 ir. Tonka Ba> fo 4i» m (Jr. iv Kn '.^ir.^* (hiN. driv
ers aww*elcra:e *in ihj. . :ve up and -er the Narro\^'^ Bridee creatmi^ a nuuh I’re.iter rj>k a.\:!Jent>.
t
O O \'^ • -
•y -»C IC'-QQ
onu^^wo ClTYofORONO
Municipal Offices
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Paricway
Orono, MN 55356
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066
August 30, 1999
Subject; No Parking Regulations County Road 19, Narrows Bridge Area
Dear Property Owner:
The City Council recently passed an ordinance directing Hennepin County to place "No Parking"
signs along both sides of County Road 19 in the area north of the Narrows Bridge.
The parking restriction were enacted for traffic safety reasons. Since this time, several property
owners have contacted the City regarding this issue. At their August 23rd meeting, the Council
decided to discuss this issue again at the September 13th meeting. This item will be discussed at
8:00 p.m. or later at the Council meeting.
All interested property owners are invited to attend this Council meeting. The council will be
receiving public comments on this issue. Written comments may also be submitted. V ?, deadline
for receipt of written comments is Wednesday September 8th.
Thank you for your interest in this matter.
Sincerely,
C\,
Gregory A. Gappa
Director of Public Serv ices
GAG/hb
If there are no existing County or State Laws prohibiting parking on a County Road,
I would allow parking North of the last two driveways before the Narrows bridge.
I would not allow parking on the bridge or during the snow plow season. Thanks fer
allowing the input.
Walt Wittmer
2780 Shadywood Rd.
Excelsior, MN 55331
Telephone (612) 249-4600 • Fax (612) 249-4616
•i
A
^OUnOIL MEETING
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION / J
DATE:
ITEM NO ?
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappa
Title Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Engineer’s Repon
Item Description: Schedule Assessment Hearing for Navarre Treatment Plant
Rehabilitation Revised Assessment Roll
We have discovered several properties missed in the preparation of the original assessment roll
for this project. The original assessment roll contained approximately 800 properties. Sixteen
properties were missed and will need to be included in a revised assessment roll. These properties
will be assessed $350 at 6.5% interest over five years the same terms as the other properties in
the project area
An assessment hearing will need to be held at the regularly scheduled Council meeting on October
11th. We are recommending approval of the attached resolutions ordering preparation of the
revised assessment roll and scheduling the assessment hearing.
COUNCIL ACTION RTOIESTED:
Approve resoluuv.,« aruering preparation of a revised assessment roll for the Navarre Water
Treatment Plant Rehabilitation Project
Approve resolution scheduling an assessment hearing for October 11th at 7:00 p.m.
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF REVISED PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
FOR NAVARRE WATER TREATMENT PLANT REHABILATION
WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the improvement of the Navarre Water Treatment
Plant and the estimated contract price for such improvement is $636,600.00 and the expenses incurred or to
be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $127,400.00 so that the total estimated cost of the
improvement will be $764,000.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO,
MINNESOTA:
1.
2.
The total cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $5,600.00.
Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period
of 5 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday
in January, 2000, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.5 per cent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3.The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper
amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against ever>' assessable lot, piece or
parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law,
and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the Clerk's office for public inspection.
4.The Clerk shall upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the Council
thereof.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held September 13,
1999.
Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
1
1
Assessment
27-Scptcmber-99
Municipality: ORONO
Total Project Assessment: S4,550.00
Municipal Code: 38
Project Number: 98-3
Levy Description: Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation
Interest Rate: 6.5% Number of Years Payable: 5
17-117-23 22 0017 $350.00 David Molstc 1765 Concordia St
PIDI^Addition
Code
Total Lot
Principal
Block Name Street
ft
Property Address Mailing Street Address
Mailing City Address
Units
20-117-23 12 0060 $350.00 Thomas Lind 2470 Carman St 2470 Carman St
Wayzata, MN 55391
1
20-117-23 31 0003 $350.00 Micliael Sullivan 3730 Casco Ave 3730 Casco Ave
Wayzata, MN 55391
1
20-117-23 31 0071 $350.00 Marti Bochmer 3750 Casco Ave 3750 Casco Ave
Wayzata, MN 55391
1
20-117-23 43 0019 $350.00 Charles Plain 3227 Casco Cir 3227 Casco Cir
Wayzata, MN 55391
1
20-117-23 23 0007 $350.00 Dave Breitner 2755 Casco Point Rd 2755 Casco Point Rd
Wayzata. MN 55391
I
20-117-23 43 0036 $350.00 Donald Kavanagh 3038 Casco Point Rd 3038 Casco Point Rd
Wayzata, MN 55391
I
17-117-23 22 0040 $350.00 Howard Alton III 1635 Concordia St 1635 Concordia St
Wayzata, MN 55391
1
Wiiy/tHii, MN 55391
Page I
PIDlf Addition Total Lot Block
Code Trincipal
Name Street
H
Property Address Mailing Street Address
Mailing City Address
Units
20-117-23 24 0046 $350.00 Michael Revicr 2691 Ethel Ave 2691 Ethel Ave
Wayzata, MN 55391
I
17-117-23 22 0029 $350.00 Paul Bozonie 1755 Fagemess Point Rd 1755 Fagemess Point Rd
Wayzata, MN 55391
1
20-117-23 42 0023 $350.00 Stephen Wilson 3510 Ivy PI 3510 Ivy PI
Wayzata, MN 55391
1
20-117-23 42 0022 $350.00 James & Sherry White 3516 Ivy PI 3516 Ivy PI
Wayzata, MN 55391
1
20-117-23 42 0019 $350.00 Ted & Nancy Capra 3534 Ivy PI 3534 Ivy PI
Wayzata, MN 55391
I
08-117-23 34 0054 $350.00 Glen Upton 3685 North Shore Dr 3685 North Shore Dr
Wayzata, MN 55391
I
17-117-23 21 0011 $350.00 Kristina Ericson 1620 Shadywood Rd 1620 Shadywood Rd
Wayzata, MN 55391
I
17-117-23 31 0047 $350.00 Robin Leighton 3640 Togo Rd 3640 Togo Rd I
$5,600.00
Wayzata, MN 55391
Page 2
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON REVISED PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
NAVARRE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
REHABILITATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Cit>- Council on September 13, 1999, the City Clerk
was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the Navarre Water Treatment Plant rehabilitation
project; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been
completed and filed in the Clerk’s office for public inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO,
MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 11th day of October, 1999 in the Orono Council Chambers, 2780
Kelley Parkway, at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons
owTiiiig property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such
assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to
be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice
the total cost of the improvement. The clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each
parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment
to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the City, except that no interest may be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from
the adoption of the assessment. He may at anytime thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with the interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such
payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding
year.
Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held September 13, 1999.
Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City^ Clerk
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MCCTifjg
SfP I 3 (999
DATE: September 13, 1999
ITEM NO.: 10
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappa
Title Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Engineer’s Report
Item Description:Change Order #1 and Request for Final Payment, Lift Station
Number 13 Rehabilitation
We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend
approval of Change Order Number 1 and the Request for Final Payment. The change order is for
increased costs for site restoration. Additional sodding, and street and driveway repair was
required for project completion.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve Change Order /^l, to GHT Construction for increased costs for site restoration
in the amount of $1,391.00.
Motion to approve Request for Final Payment, to GHT Construction in the amount of $5,504.00,
w 09/07/99 11:35 & :02/02 NO:919
M Bonestroo
Rosene
n Anderiik&
Aisoaates
lAjlntertl Archiitcu
Ow-Tier; City ofOrono, 2750 Kelly Parkwiy.PO Box 66/Crysul Bay. N(N 35323-X66 Date: September 7,1999
Contractor GHT Construction, 2750 I02nd St. SE, Delano, MN 55328
Bond Co. Misehke - Borrell & Amocs. Inc., 1000 Shelard Parkway #250, Minneapolis, MN 55126
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
LIFT STATION NO. 13 RENOVATION
BRA FILE NO. 139-98-800
Description of Work
This change order is to reconcile the unit price site restoration bid quantities with the actual
quantities required. Overail, somewhat more site restoration was required than origL-uIly estimated.
Quantity
No.Item
5
6
7
8
Seeding
Sod
Class S Aggregate Base
Bituminous Paving
Unit
Bid
Quantity
Actual
Quantity
lo crease
(Decrease)
Bid
Price
Cost
DilTerence
SY 30 0 (30.0C)S4.00 (SI 20.00)
SY 10 75 65 00 S8.00 S520.00
TON 17 22.65 5.65 S40.00 S226.00
TON 8 16.5 8.50 $90.00 S765.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 SU91.00
Original Contract Amount
Previous Change Orders
This Change Order
Revised Contract Amount (including this change order)5109,291.00
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
date:
Approved by Contractor:Approved by Owner
cc: Owfner
Contractor
Bonding Company
Bonestroo & Assoc.
change order 1 V
• i
..J
$107,900.00
$0.00 .
$1,391.00
.. f
1
. 4
!l
w 09/08/99 09:01 0 :02/04 NO:958
Borwitroo
Rosene
Owner; ritv of Orono. 2730 Kelly Parlwav. PO Box 66. Crystal Bay. MN 55323-00- Date: September 8. 1999
*iFor Period. July 23.1999 to August 18.1999 Associate^
Request No: 4 & Final Revised
bWttAitfwniContractor: GMT Construction. Inc.. 2750 102nd Street SE, Delano. NTN 55328
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
LIFT STATION NO. 13 REHABILITATION
BRA FILE NO. 139-9M00
SUMMARY
I Original Contract Amount
Change Order - Addition
Change Order - Deduction
Revised Contract Amount
Value Completed to Date
Material on Hand
Amount Earned
8 Less Retainage OVo
9 Subtotal
10 Less Amount Paid Previously
II AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.
S
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
S
U91.00
4 & Final Revised
S,
S
s
s
$
s
s
$
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCLATES, INC.
Approved by Owner:
CITY OF ORONO
Specified Contract Completion Date:
MAY 31,1999 _________________
Date:
K:\139\l399a80U\WORD\REQUEST4WB2
107.900.00
109,291.00
109,291.00
0.00
109,291.00
0.00
109,291.00
103.787.00
5.504.00
>• «
w
No. Item
Approved Alternate No. 1
1 Temporary controls, pumps and piping for
interim conveyance
Lift station demoiition or new valve vault
New pumps, piping, valves, wet well, top
hatch, and slab
New control panel, base slab, and
miscellaneous electrical
Seeding with 4 inch topsoil
Sod with 4 inch topsoil
8 inch Class 5 aggregate base
8 3 inch thick bituminous driveway
TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE
Change Order No. 1
9 Seeding
10 Sod
11 Class 5 Aggregate Base
12 Bituminous Paving
Total Change Order No. 1
TON
TON
•- i
17
8
09/08/99 09:01 B :03/04 NO:958
Unit
Contract
Quantity
Unit
Price
Quantity
to Date
Current
Quantity
Amount
to Date
LS 1 5,500.00 1.00 3,500.00
LS 1 6,800.00 1.00 6,800.00
LS 1 74,000.00 1.00 74,000.00
LS 1 20,000.00 1.00 20.000.00
SY 30 4.00
SY 10 8.00 75.00 75.00 600 00
TN 17 40.00 22.65 906.00
TN 8 90.00 16.50 16.50 1.485.00
109491.00
SY 30 4.00 0 (120.00)
SY 10 8.00 75 520.00
40.00
90.00
22.65
16.30
226.00
765.00
1,391.00
■■ i
.• j
• 1
• -i
K;V138\1399M00\WOR0\REQUEST4.WB2
w
PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS
Owner City of Orono
Project No.
File No. 139-98-800
Contractor GHt Constr. Inc.
CHANGE ORDERS
PAYMENT SU^LMARY
No. Period Retaloate
Material on Hand
K.\l3a'l3WMCC'WCftD'REQUEST4.WB2
09/08/99 09:01 B :04/04 NO:95f
AmountINO.
1
uaie
09/07/99 Seedina. sod. Class 5 aasreaate. bituminous paving 1.391.00
2
Total Chanee Orden -------------------------Sl.391.00
Completed
Tnfal PavrncnC tO D3tc SI 09.291.88 Original Contract SI 07.900.00
0.00 Change Orders 1.391.00
Total Amount Earned________SI09.29I.88 Revised Connact _____S109.291.00
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
^^UNcii MEETING
15 m9
DATE:
ITEM NO
//
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappa
Title Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Engineer's Report
Item Description: Traffic Signal Justification Report for County Road 15/51 Intersection
Bonestroo Engineers recently completed a traffic study for the County Road 15 corridor in eastern
Orono. This study has been discussed by the Council at a work session meeting. One of the
recommendations of this study was to further investigate the installation of a traffic signal at the
County Road 15/51 intersection to provide for safer access onto County Road 15 from County
Road 51. This is especially important during the morning rush hour when it is difficult to make
a left mm onto County 15 because of the heavy eastbound traffic. Preliminary traffic counts
showed this intersection most likely will meet the required warrants for the installation of a traffic
signal. Per Minnesota State Starnes detailed traffic counts must be completed and a signal
justification report completed before a traffic signal can be installed. Twelve to sixteen hours of
traffic counts must be completed.
We have obtained a pronosal from Bonestroo Engineers for completion of a signal Justification
report for this project. The estimated cost for this smdy is $2,200. After completion, this smdy
will be submitted to Hennepin County for review and approval. If signal warrants are met,
additional discussions with the County will be required to discuss a project schedule and funding
options. We are recommending Council acceptance of this proposal.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to accept proposal from Bonestroo Engineers for preparation of a Traffic Signal
Justification Report for the County Road 15/51 intersection at an estimated cost of $2,200.
2
1/1 Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
floneifroo. Rosene. Anaeriu end Associates, tnc. is an Affirmative Actton/Eqt^al Opportunity Employer
Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. PE. • Joseph C Andcrltk. PE. • Marvin L Sorvala. PE •
Glenn R. Cook. PE. • Robert G. Schunicht. PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. •
Robert W. Rosene. PE.. Richard E Turner. PE and Susan M. Eberlm. C PA.. Senior Consultants
Associate Principals: Howard A Sanford. PE • Keith A Gordon. PE. • Robert R Pfefferle. PE. •
Richard W Foster. PE. • David O Loskota. PE • Robert C Russck. A IA • Mark A. Hanson. PE. •
Michael T. Rautmann. PE. • Ted K.FIeld. PE. • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolfs. P.£ •
Sidney P Williamson. PE. LS. • Robert F. Kotsmith • Agnes M Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE.
Offices: St. Paul. Rochester. Wiilmar and St. Cloud. MN • Milwaukee, Wl
Weosite wwwisonestroo com
September 3, 1999
Mr. Greg Gappa
Director of Public Works
City of Orono
2750 Kelly Parkway
Orono. MM 55356
Re: Proposal for Signal Justification Report for
Intersection of CSAH 15 and 51
Our File No. 139-Gen
Dear Mr. Gappa:
Pursuant to your request, we are pleased to provide this proposal for purposes of preparing a
signal justification report (SIR) for the intersection of CSAH 15 and 51 in Orono. The SIR will
be prepared to meet required elements of Hennepin County for such documents. Our proposed
scope of ser\ices follows.
Scope of Services
Task 1 - Conduct Intersection Traffic Counts - Intersection turning movement traffic counts will
be conducted per County requirements. These counts will be a minimum of 12 hours and a
ma.\imum of 16 hours in duration. Delay counts will not be conducted.
Task 2 - Collect Data - Accident information and geometric data will be collected. We have this
data as a result of our CSAH 15 study.
Task 3 - Review Signal Warrants - The count and accident data will be reviewed with respect to
traffic signal warrants contained in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MMUTCD).
Task 4 - Prepare SJR - A draft of the SJR will be prepared for your review. Following receipt
of your comments, the final will be prepared and submitted to Hennepin County for their review
and action.
We will be available to meet, as necessary, to discuss the SJR. We have budgeted for two (2)
meetings.
2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 65I-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-I3II
Cost Estimate
We can prepare this SJR for a cost of $2,200. The cost can be reduced if you have a staff person
who is available to conduct the 12-16 hour turning movement counts. We can discuss that if you
desire that option.
We are prepared to initiate this work and would anticipate having a draft SJR to you in three
weeks following authorization to proceed.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-604-4839.
Sincerely,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Sheldon J. Johnson
Transportation Group Leader
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: September 13, 1999
ITEM NO.: /jL.
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappri
Title Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Engineer's Report
Item Description: Joint Powers Agreement with Metro Transit for Bus Route Signing
The Meu-oplolition Council is asking for the City’s consideration of a program for the installation,
replacement, and maintenance of bus stop signs. This is a reimbursement program in which Met
Council furnishes all of the materials, and the City is reimbursed for the work completed. Many
Cities are already in this program. Met Council has proposed this program as a cost-efft. tive
method for sign maintenance because they do not have adequate staff to complete this work. Cities
have staff available that can cost effectively complete this work as travel costs are minimal. The
initial phase will require replacing all of the existing signs with new signs on the same post. After
this is completed, the work will consist of repairing damaged signs and the occasional installation
of a new sign. There are approximately 120 bus signs in the City of Orono. The estimated project
cost for the initial replacement of the signs is about $8,500. The amount of work required for this
program should be minimal and can be handled by the public works personnel.
We are reconunending Council approval of this Joint Powers Agreement with the Met Council
for the installation, maintenance, and repair of bus stop signs.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve Joint Powers Agreement between the Metropolitan Council and the City of
Orono for the installation, replacement and maintenance of bus stop signs.
O MetroTransit R2CSIV5D
AUG 1 8 1999
ClTYOFCnO.Vo
Augiist 16,1999
Mr. Greg Gappa
City of Orono
PO Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Mr. Greg Gappa,
Metro Transit is requesting that the City of Orono participate in a bus stop sign
installation, replacement and maintenance program. I have contacted cities, served by
Metro Transit, and breifly explained the features of the requested program. For your
review and your City’s review, I have attached the following documents:
A Joint Powers Agreement between the Metropolitan Council and the City of
Orono (2 copies)
A Field List for pyample only. At time of construction a district supervisor will
work with your crew and supply them with a completed field list as to the exact location
of each bus stop sign.
Metro Transit has no sign crew to install, replace or maintain bus stop signs. The
attached Joint Powers Agreement sets forth the terms and reimbursement of a bus stop
sign installation, replacement and maintenance program that would be performed by the
City and reimbursed by Metro Transit (Metropolitan Council). Key provisions of the
agreement are listed below:
1. The Joint Powers Agreement - sets forth terms and conditions of the work
2. Exhibit A - lists each sign location and specifies the sign replacement
conditions
3. Exhibit B - summarizes the total number of signs estimating the quantities
required
4. Exhibit C - calculates the estimated value of the contract, subject to actual field
conditions
5. Exhibit D - a form the city would use to obtain reimbursement from the
Metropolitan Council
6. Exhibit E - Federal lobbying restriction due to ftmding source
Note that the final reimbursement is determined by the actual work required and the
quantities used are simply an estimate based on replacement experience. Also note that
any maintenance required is reunbursed on a labor, equipment and material basis. There
is not an absolute schedule for this project, but we do want to get most of the signs
installed as soon as possible. We understand that your efficiency in installation is a
function of the time fimne available and we plan to be as flexible as possible.
A service of the Metropolitan Council
'i
*1
560 Sixth Avenue North
hnpy/www.metrotransit o^g
M nneapolis. Minnesota 55411*43^8 (612) 349-7400 Transit Info 373-3333 TTY341-0U0
An Equal Oppctunity Employe^
If you review the attached douments and have questions or if you want to meet with me
or a representative form Metro Transit, please contact me at (612) 349-7678, FAX (612)
349-7548.
Sincerely,
'Xmx^
Tracey Jackson
Public Facilities Administrator
Council Contract No. 98-01S-64
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND
THE CITY OF ORONO
FOR INSTALLATION, REPLACEMENT, AND
MAINTENANCE OF BUS STOP SIGNAGE
day of . 19___, between theTHIS AGREEMENT is made this_____
Metropolitan Council (“the Council ”), a Minnesota political subdivision, and the City of Orono(“the
City ”), a Minnesota municipal corporation.
WHEREAS, the Council is authorized by Minnesota Statutes section 473.405 to construct, equip, and
operate transit and paratransit systems in the seven-county metropolitan area; and
WHEREAS, the Council has begun Capital Improvement Project Number 3291, for providing new bus
stop signs at all its bus stops, and route number and destination holders at selected bus stops; and
WHEREAS, new and existing bus stop signs and related signs require ongoing maintenance and
replacement, and Council route changes may necessitate moving the location of bus stops and bus zones;
and
r
WHEREAS, the City possesses the authority, skill, and expertise to install, remove, maintain, and
retrofit traffic signs and sign-mounting structures within its jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the Council and the City desire jointly and cooperatively to provide for installation,
replacement, and maintenance of signage, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 471.59, to serve the
needs of residents and visitors who use transit.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained in this agreement, the parties
agree as follows:
L DEFINITIONS
1.01 Circle-T Signs. “Circle-T Signs” mean- the old bus stop signs removed by the City,
bearing the logo of a white “T’ within a white circle on a red background.
1.02 Holders. “Holders ” mean units for displaying route number, destination and other
transit service information at bus stops.
1.03 Holder Components. “Holder Components ” means the holder units; mounting screws,
nuts, washers, and bearing plates; and tamperproof clamps and screws with necessary keying tools.
1.04 Sign Components. “Sign Components ” means the new bus stop signs and nylon
washers.
-1
n.LOCATION OF BUS STOPS
2.01 Council Selection. The Council is responsible for selecting locations for bus stops and
bus stop signage, and for providing the criteria for placement of bus stop signage. The Council will
notify Ae City of the locations selected by the Council for bus stops and bus stop signage. If the City has
concerns regarding a proposed location, the City will notify the Council in writing within ninety (90)
days of the City’s receipt of Council notice of the proposed location. The Council will consider the
City’s input in making the final determination whether to implement the proposed location.
2.02 Access for People with Disabilities. The City and the Council will coordinate and
consult regarding development of a plan for providing access to new bus stops in accordance with the
applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the regulations implementing
the Act at 49 C J.R. part 37, Appendix A, section 10.2.
in. INSTALLATION OF NEW BUS STOP SIGNS; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
3.01 Location Lists. With this agreement, the Council shall provide to the City a preliminary
bus stops list designating locations at which bus stop signage is required and designating the locations at
which Holders will be installed. Prior to commencement of the work, the Council will provide to the
City a detailed, updated bus stop sign inventory with specific information on the signage required at each
bus stop location. A sample inventory is attached to this agreement as Exhibit A.
3.02 Delivery of Bus Stop Signs and Holders. The Council will furnish to the City Sign
Components, consisting of bus stop signs and nylon washers for protecting the reflective front face of the
bus stop signs, to be used by the City for installation of the signs. The Council will furnish to the City
Holder Components, consisting of complete holder units and mounting screws, nuts, washers, and
bearing plates; and tamperproof clamps for pipe installations and tamperproof screws for channel
installations, including necessary keying tools. The Council will provide the City with a schedule for
delivery of Sign and Holder Components. The Council will deliver Sign and Holder Components in
substantial cartons with each sign and Holder protected to minimize the possibility of damage. The City
shall notify the Council of signs or Holders found to be defective within a reasonable time after receipt of
a delivery. The Council shall replace quantities of defective Sign or Holder Components to the extent
permitted by its reserve supply. The City shall not install defective Sign or Holder Components.
3.03 Storage and Handling of Bus Stop Signs and Holders. The City shall inventory the
Sign and Holder Components received and maintain the mventory showing Components installed and in
storage. The City shall use due care in handling the Components and shall store the Components in a
secure and dry location, stacking them on pallets or using otner storage means that provide for air
circulation between the floor surface and the cartons. The City shall not store the signs or Holders
stacked flat. The City is responsible for loss of or damage to the Sign and Holder Components while in
the City’s storage. The City shall not install damaged Sign or Holder Components.
3.04 Installation. "Tie City shall be responsible for all work related to installing bus stop
signs and Holders at locations in the City as designated by the Council in the bus stops list or bus stop
sign inventory. This includes removal, recycling or disposing of materials, and repairs where necessary.
The City shall provide all equipment, tools, and supplies necessary for installation, other than the Sign
and Holder Components provided by the Council. The City shall be responsible for placement of the
signs at the bus stops in a manner in compliance with the sign placement criteria furnished to the City by
the Council. All hardware and other materials furnished and installed by the City shall be corrosion
resistant, for exterior use, and of a quality at least equal to those used by the City for similar work. All
hardware and other materials furnished and installed by the City shall be new and fine from defects upon
-.2-
completion of the work. The City shall use the nylon protective washers furnished by the Council under
the City’s own metal washers used in mounting the bus stop signs. The City shall install the protective
nylon washers directly against the reflective sheeting of the front face of t>ie bus stop signs. The City
shall be responsible for recycling existing Circle-T Signs removed under this agreement
3.05 Holder Installation. In installing Holders, the City shall use either Council-fiunished
safety, tamper-proof hardware, or tamper-proof hardware selected by and acquired at the City’s own
expense. The City shall install Holders in a manner so as to maximize pedestrian safety and minimize
vulnerability to vandalism. The City shall perform the installation of each Holder by (1) removing the
top (or bottom) end cap and glass window, (2) mounting the Holder to the sign-mounting structure
approximately 5 feet, 10 inches (70 inches) from grade to the top of the Holder, and (3) replacing the
glass window and refastening the top (or bottom) end cap to the Holder body.
The City shall mount the Holder as labeled: “INSTALL HOLDER THIS END UP” to help insure that
the bottom end cap (with its pre-fitted neoprene setting blocks for receiving the glass window) is at the
bottom of the installed Holder. The Council shall be responsible for the installation of its own
informational inserts in the Holder.
IV. COMPENSATION FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
4.01 Initial Worksheet and Proposal Sheet. The Council has prepared an initial Worksheet
and an initial Proposal Sheet for the City’s work related to Capital Improvement Project Number 3291.
The initial Worksheet and the initial Proposal Sheet are attached to and incorporated in this agreement as
Exhibit B and Exhibit C, respectively. The initial Worksheet and the initial Proposal Sheet display initial
database quantities, application factors, projected quantities, and proposed compensation for the work to
be performed.
4.02 Payment The Council shall reimburse the City based on unit prices per task multiplied
by quantities of tasks performed.
4.03 Compensation. The Council ’s estimate of reimbursement to the City is shown tu the
initial Proposal Sheet (Exhibit C).
a. Quantities entered on Exhibit C are from March 1995 or a more current update of the
Council ’s Allstops database.
b.Unit costs entered on Exhibit C are the Council ’s estimate of fair and equitable
compensation for the work to be performed.
4.04 Invoice Requirements. Progress payments and cumulative total compensation to the
City shall be in accordance with an approved Cost Tabulation Sheet in the format in Exhibit D attached
to and incorporated in this agreement. The Cost Tabulation Sheet shall be completed by the City and
submitte ’ to the Council for payment as follows:
a.
b.
Quantities entered on the Cost Tabulation Sheet shall be invoice quantities of actual
work performed.
Quantities entered on the Cost Tabulation Sheet shall not exceed quantities shown on
Exhibit C unless so amended by prior written notification and mutual acceptance by
authorized representatives of the Council and the City.
-3-
V.
c. Unit costs entered on the Cost Tabulation Sheet shall be identical to the unit costs shown
on Exhibit C unless otherwise approved in writing by an authorized representative of the
Council.
d. Payment under this agreement is subject to the following requirements:
(i) Billings shall be submitted not more hequently than once per month. However,
the Council encourages the City to submit one billing upon completion of the
work or progress billings at regular semi-annual or quarterly intervals.
(ii) Invoices must include the Council contract number.
ROUTINE REPLACEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING BUS STOP
SIGNAGE
5.01 Services. The City shall be responsible for installing, maintaining, relocating, and
moving existing bus step signs and new bus stop signs installed after the date of this agreement at bus
stop locations designated by the Council. The Council shall provide the signs. The City shall supply the
signposts, hardware, and labor and equipment required for routine replacement and maintenance of bus
stop signs.
5.02 Compensation. The Council will reimburse the City for the reasonable costs meurred in
connection with routine maintenance and replacement of signs. The City shall submit invoices to the
Council not more frequently than once per month for the City’s routine bus stop sign replacement and
maintenance activities. Each invoice must contain the Council contract number and be supplemented by
an accompanying and separate detailed description of the work involved; the labor and equipment used
in the performance of the work; and the parts and materials furmshed by the City.
VI. TERM AND TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
6.01 Term. This agreement shall commence on the date of execution of this agreement and
shall continue in force and effect until terminated in accordance with paragraph 6.02.
6.02 Termination of Agreement Once the City has completed its responsibilities for
Capital Improvement Project number 3251, or if the Council notifies the City that funds for Capital
Improvement Project Number 3291 have been depleted or withdrawn, the portions of this agreement
providing for the performance of and pavuicnt for w ork for Capital Improvement Project number 3291
shall terminate. This agreement may also be terminated by either party without cause upon sbety (60)
days’ written notice to the other party.
Vn. ACCOUNTING, RECORD, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
7.01 Separate Accounts. The City agrees to establish and maintain separate accounts for the
work undertaken pursuant to article III and article V. The Cit>- will maintain accurate and complete
records and accounts relating to the receipt and expenditure of any and all funds paid by the Council
under this agreement. The City must maintain adequate records to document all invoices submitted to
the Council. All accounts and records shall be kept and maintained for a period of at least six (6) years
following the termination of this agreement
-4-
7.02 Audit As required by Minnesota Statutes section 16C.0S, subd. S, the records, books,
documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the City and of any subcontrai. or relating to
work performed pursuant to this agreement shall be subject to audit and examination b} Council and the
Legislative Auditor and State Auditor. The City shall permit the Council or its designee to inspect and
copy all accounts, records and business documents, including those of any subcontractor, at any time
during regular business hours as necessary to audit this agreement. Within thirty (30) days after
completion, the City shall deliver to the Council a copy of any financial or operational audit of the work
performed by the City done by the City or at its request or at the direction of any governmental agency or
department The Council shall have the right in its discretion to monitor, examine, and investigate all
elements of the work performed pursuant to this agreement.
Vm. GENERAL PROVISIONS
8.01 Amendments. The terms of this agreement may be changed by mutual agreement of the
parties. Changes shall be effective only upon execution of written amendment(s) signed by authorized
representatives of the Council and the City.
8.02 Compliance with Law. In performing the work provided for in this agreement, the City
agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. In particular, the City will be
responsible for performing installation of bus stop signs and holders in compliance with the applicable
provisions of:
a. MINNESOTA MANUAL FOR UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS, current edition and as amended.
b. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, current edition and as amended.
c. MINNESOTA STATUTES CHAPTER 2I6D regarding e.xcavation, location of
underground facilities, notification of Gopher State One Calling System and precautions
to avoid damage.
Specific provisions in this article include, in part, certain standard terms and conditions required by the
Department of Transportation (“DOT’), whether or not expressly set forth in the preceding provisions.
All contractual provisions required by DOT to be passed to the City, as set forth in FTA Circular
4220.ID, dated April 15, 1996, are hereby incorporated by reference. Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this agreement, all Federal Transit Administration (“FTA”) mandated terms shall be deemed
to control in the event of a conflict with other provisions contained in this agreement. The City shall not
perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any Council requests which would
cause the Council to be in violation of the FTA terms and conditions. However, no reference to DOT or
FTA shall be construed to make DOT or FTA a party to this agreement
8.03 Project Management Responsibility. The City shall be responsible to furnish or
secure, administer, and manage all labor, material, equipment and support for the accomplishment of the
work, except as expressly stipulated to be furnished by or as the responsibility of the Council. Under the
terms of this agreement, the City has and retains full control iid supervision of the services and full
control over the employment, direct compensation and discharge of all persons assisting in the
performance of its services under this agreement. The City agrees to be solely responsible for all matters
relating to payment of employees, including compliance with social security, payroll taxes and
withholdings, unemployment compensation, and all other regulations governing such matters. The City
agrees that any and all of its employees and all other persons employed by it in the performance of any
-5-
work or services required or provided under this agreement, shall not be considered employees of the
Council and that any and all claims that may arise under the Worker ’s Compensation Act of Minnesota
on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third parties as a
consequence of a*»y act or omission on the part of the City’s or any subcontractor ’s employees or other
persons while so engaged on any of the work or services to be rendered shall not be the obligation or
responsibility of the Council.
8.04 Contact Persons. Upon entering this agreement, the Council and the City will each
notify the other of the name(s) and telephone numbeif^s) of contact persons for their respective duties
under this agreement. The Council and the City shall each notify the other as soon as possible of any
changes in the contact persons. If there are no changes in contact persons, by January 1 of each year this
agreement is in effect, the City and the Council will confirm to the other that the information regarding
the identified contact person remains valid.
8.05 Liability. Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its owti acts and the results
thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the
results thereof. The City’s and the Council ’s liability shall be governed by the Minnesota Municipal Tort
Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes chapter 466, and other applicable law.
8.06 No Waiver. Nothing in this agreement shall be interpreted as a waiver or release of
either the Council ’s or the City’s authority under Minnesota Statutes section 473.411, subdivision 5,
pertaining to Council use of highways and other public roadways and roadway appurtenances. The
Council reserves its rights to have Council staff or contractors install temporary or permanent signs
where necessitated by route changes or weather detours, or as required to conduct its public transit and
paratransit operations.
8.07 Equal Employment Opportunity; Non-Discrimination. In conjunction with the
execution of its obligations, the City agrees that it and any subcontractors shall not discriminate against
any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, natural origin, sex,
sexual orientation, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, age, membership or
activity in a local civil rights commission, or political affiliation, and shall take affirmative actions to
ensure applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race,
color, creca, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, status with regard to public
assistance, disability, age, membership or activity in a local civil rights commission, or political
affiliation, in all matters, including employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer, reemitment or
recruitment advertising; layoff, return from layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of
compensation; and selection for training or apprenticeship.
The City agrees that it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PL 88-352) and all
requirements imposed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, to the end that, in accordance with Title
\T of the Act, no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, sex or national origin, be
excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination
under any program or activity funded by this agreement
The City further agrees that it, and any subcontractors under this agreement, shall not discriminate
against any qualified disabled person who is an employee or applicant for employment and shall take
affirmative action to ensure that such qualified individuals are treated without regard to their disability in
regard to job application procedures; hiring, advancement or discharge of employees; compensation; job
training; and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment, pursuant *o the Americans with
Disabilities Act.
-6-
In addition, the City agrees to abide by the requirements of 49 C.F.R, Part 23, regarding minority
(disadvantaged) business enterprises in DO T programs Failure to carry out the requirements set forth in
49 C.F.R. section 23.43(a) shall constitute a breach of this agreement and, after the notification of the
DOT, may result in termination of this agreement by the Council or such remedy as the Council deems
appropriate.
8.08 Permits, Bonds, and Approvals. The City is responsible for obtaining all applicable local
and state licenses, permits, bonds, and authorizations necessary for performing the work in this
agreement.
8.09 Federal Requirements. The City acknowledges that this agreement is subject to FTA
requirements for third party procurement. The City acknowledges that, if the City subcontracts the work
provided for in this agreement, the City will conduct any subcontractor solicitation and require
performance of subcontracted portions of this agreement in compliance with applicable FTA
requirements, including requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act, the Seismic Safety requirements of 42
U.S.C. §7701, the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, and the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act.
The City shall seek assisuace from the Council in determining the applicability of these Federal
requirements for any subcontracted work to be done under this agreement.
8.10 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility, and Voluntary
Exclusion. If this agreement is in a total amount exceeding $100,000.00, by signing this agreement, the
City certifies that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment,
declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this agreement by any Federal
department or agency. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which the Council
relies in entering this agreement. If it is later determined that the City knowingly rendered an erroneous
certification, in addition to other remedies available to tlie Federal Government, the department or
agency with which this transaction originated may pursue availdblc remedies, including suspension
and/or debarment. The City shall provide to the Council imn ediate written notice if it any time the City
learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or h.xs become erroneous by reason of changed
circumstances. The City further certifies that it will comply wi h the requirements of 49 C.F.R. section
29.510 and obtain the required certifications before entering inU^ any subcontracts over $100,000 using
funds provided through this agreement, and submit copies of the subcontractors* certifications to the
Council.
8.11 Certification of Restrictions on Lobbying; Disclosure. If this agreement is in a total
amount exceeding $100,000, the City certifies that no federal appropriated funds have been paid or will
be paid by or on behalf of the City for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of
any federal agency, a member <' f Congress, an office^ oi employee of Congress, or an employee of a
member of Congress in connection with the awarding of arv federal contract, the making of any f deral
grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension,
continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement. A certification of this compliance is attached to and made a part of this agreement as Exhibit
E. The City further certifies that, if any funds omer than federal appropriated funds have been paid or
will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any
federal agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member
of Congress in connection with the projects funded by the funds allocated to the City in this agreement,
the City shall complete and submit to the Council, Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying .” in accordance with its instructions.
The City certifies that it will require the language of this certification be included in the award
documents for any subcontracts in excess of $100,000.00 under this agreement, and that all
-7-
subcontractors shall certify and disclose accordingly to the City. The certifications referred to in diis
article and attached and made a part of this agreement are material representations of fact upon which the
Council relies when this agreement is made.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly-
authorized representatives.
CITY OF ORONO
By____________
Its ____
Date
Approved as to form:
Lynn M. Belgea
Associate General Counsel r
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
By_____________________
James J. Solem, Regional Administrator
Date ______________
8/16/99 2:01 PM PROPOSAL Page1
r
liMCSIGL- Yds i ! 1 Orono
117 MC SIGN NONE i TOTAL RECORDS =
118 check sum with total records
1.00 accuracy ^ctor 1
1
i
1 1
MC SIGN YES U-postlO-pIpe iUght Power Signal |SQ& Other
FRONT 01 0 o: . 0 1
% factors =1 1.00 O.OOi ! O.OOjcorrAinad i 1.00
BACK 1
J
1 i !
mm BOTH
OTHER 1
1 TOTAL PLUS "BOTH"0!—retrofits!1
1
117 MC SIGN NONE
1
AVAILABLE STRUCTURES | |
YES, CITY FRONT NO PRKG 16 1 1
101 (x % light power signal other) 1 0.00 0 1
1
TOTAL NEW SIGNS ON EXISTING STRUCTURES 16
i I
NO AVAILABLE STRUCTURES __________^__________1 I
101 (x % U's X % concrete)1.00 0.12! (CONCRETE) U-POSTS 12
101 (x % U's X % non-concrete)1.00 i 0.88 1 (NON-CONCRETE) U-POSTS 89
101 (X % O's X % concrete)0.00 0.12 ! (CON CRETE) O-PIPES 0
101 (X % O’s X % non-concrete)0.00 0.88 (NON-CONCRETE) O-PIPES 0
1.00 1
i
j
calculations for "NO AVAILABLE STRUCTURES" 1
NO, CITY FRONT NO PRKG 1 % factors =
BUS STOP SURFACE
concrete i 0.12
bituminous
1 gravel
sodded h*----> ^!1
unimproved 1 1
other i 1
non-concrete 1 96 0.88
i 109 1.00
i 1 1
"calculations" accuracy range of 01 101 109 TOTAL MC SIGNS 118
minus "BOTH", above (0)
1 ITOTAL STOPS 1 118 |
interagency Agreenient, Capital EXHIBITS
8/16/99 2:00 PM PROPOSAL Page1
Metro Transit Contract No. 98-015-64 1
with the City of Orono ;
NO.DESCRIPTION
Quantity
Estimating
Factor
QTY.UNIT
PRICE TOTALS
11.0! RETROFIT/INSTALL: NEW SIGN ON EXISTING SIGN MOUNTING STRUCTURE.
I 11.11 Retrofit existing sign with new sign. i ! 1 x $20 —20 1
1.2| Install new sign on existing structure.! > 16 X $20 =320!
1.2.1 Lengthen existing pipe or post 50% of 1.2! 8i X $20 160
1.3 Install holder.: ! X!$30 =0
'1.4 Soecial 1.4: i I x • i =0
i 1 1.0 Sub-total $500
!!
2.0 REMOVE: EXISTING STRUCTURE WHERE EXISTING BUS SIGN & STOP ARE VACATED/RELOCATED. |
2.1 Remove and patch, soil/blacktop.50% of 1.1 0! X $20 =1
!2.2 Remove and patch, concrete.50% of 1.1 01 xl $20 =1
1 2.0 Sub-total =$2
1
;i0 INSTALL: NEW SIGN MOUNTING STRUCTURE AND SIGN.
3.1 U-post (concrete).12|X $80 =964
3.2 U-post (non-concrete).89 X $70 s 6,2271
13.3!Round pipe (concrete).0 X $100 —01
1 ! 3.4 Round pipe (non-concrete).! 0 X $1201 =Oi
1 ! 13.0 Sub-total = ! $7,1901 |
------1—
1 1 i 1
U.O OTHER.1r~r^Special 4.1: 1 X =0
1 4.2 Soecial 4.2: !X 1=1 01 1
i4.0 Sub-total =$0
1 1
GRAND TOTAL s $7,692
Contingency: 10%NOT TO EXCEED s $8,462
•
CHECK HERE TO SELECT (unit prices) PAYMENT OPTION IN0.1
ChlECK HERE TO SELECT (time & material) PAYMENT OPTION [NO. 2
1 1 i
Estimated % of work by City's own resources.%
Estimated % of work by City's sub-contracts.%
lEsKmated % of work bv CitVs aareement wtth Citv of %
1
1 1 1
1
Record of revisions: bv on : bv on ; by on : bv on
/Citv or MCTOi: of : of : of ; of
Date received by MCTO:
Version 1
v1 Payment Option and Esdmated % of work entered by Date:
11 1 i ‘ i 1 1
Interagency Agreement, Capital EXHIBIT C
8/16/99 2:00 PM Cost Tabulation Sheet City enter actual quantities.
Metro Transit Contract No. 98-015-64
with the City of Orono
NO.DESCRIPTION QTY.UNIT
PRICE
♦i
TOTALS
I
1.0 RETROFIT/INSTALL: NEW SIGN ON EXISTING SIGN MOUNTING STRUCTURE.
1.1 Retrofit existing sign with new sign.X mm $
1.2 Install new sign on existing structure.11 X =$
1.2.1 Lengthen existing pipe or post X =$ 1
1.3 Install holder.X =$
1.4 Soecial 1.4:i=$
1.0 Sub-:otal i = i$ ~|
1 i 1
2.0 REMOVE: EXISTING STRUCTURE WHERE EXISTING BUS SIGN & STOP ARE VACATED/RELOCATED.
2.1 Remove and patch, soil/blacktop.X !=i$
2.2 Remove and patch, concrete.!X i=i$
2.0 Sub-total 1 = 1$
t 1 :
3.0 INSTALL: NEW SIGN MOUNTING STRUCTURE AND SIGN.1 1 i
1
3.1 U-post (concrete).i xi I='$
3.2 U-post (non-concrete).{X' 1=!$
3.3 Round pipe (concrete).i X! i=i$
3.4IRound pipe (non-concrete).1 xl !=•$
13.0 Sub-total i=l$
i 1 ' !
4.0 OTHER.1 i i
4.1 Special 4.1: i x i=!$
4.2 Soecial 4.2:xi ='$
4.0 Sub-total =1$
1 i
GRAND TOTAi=!$ |
! i
Agreement (unit prices) PAYMENT OPTION N0.1
1 Agreement (time & material) PAYMENT OPTION NO. 2 I
i
Approx. % of work done by City's own resources.%I
Aoorox. % of work done bv Citv’s sub-contracts.%!
Aoorox. % of work done bv City's aqreement with Citv of 1 %l (
!Totals| = i %! :
i 1
Recoru of revisions; bv on : bv . on _: by on : bv on
KCitv or M.T.): Of : of : of : of
Version 1 1
V Checked by Metro Transit Public Facilities Dept, bv Date:
1 Date received by Metro Transit
V 'Quantities of work Derfbrmed and approx. % of work entered bv Date:
Page 1 Interagency Agreement, CnpiuJi EXHIBIT D
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
^UNnil. MCCTIN3
SEP I 3 ,99,
DATE: Sepfiffi66i<-iami3g^
ITEM NO /?
Department Approval:
Name Gregory A. Gappa
Title Director of Public Services
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Fngineer ’s Report
Item Description: Repair of Well Number 1, Navarre Water System
We have been experiencing water quality and operational problems with well number one, the
main well for the Navarre water system. Well number two is currently being used. This well was
repaired and upgraded in 1997 to provide enough capacity to supply the system. After the weP
one pump shuts off, water and air bubble out from cracks in the floor around the pump base. Th j
indicates mechanical problems with the top of the well, pump, or casing vent. Removal cf the
pump will be necessary to determine the nature of the problem.
The last major work on this well was completed ten years ago. Wells typically operate 7 to 10
years between major repairs and lehabilitation. A report from Bonestroo Engineers describing
the problems and estimated costs for repair is attached. The exact costs for repair cannot be
determined until after the pump is removed. The estimated cost range for the repairs is $25,000
to $50,000. This will require advertising for sealed bids for completion of this work.
This work should be completed this fall and winter, so we are not dependant on only one well
next spring and summer during higher water demand months. The well is located inside the
treatment plant building, so winter work is not a problem.
The 1999 water operating budget includes a $13,000 line item for equipment maintenance and
repair. Completion of a budget adjustment will be required after this project is completed.
We are requesting Council authorization to prepare plans and specifications and advertise for bids
for completion of this work. After bids are received. Council approval will be required to award
a contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to authorize pieparation of plans and specifications and advertising for bids for the repair
of well number one for the Navarre water system.
Il»
1/1 Bonestroo
Rosene
^5 Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
Boneitroo, Bosene. Anderhk Associates, foe ts An AffirmMi^e Action/iqujt Opportunity Bmptoyer
Principals. Otto G Bonestroo. ?t • Joseph C Anderlik. PE • Marvin L. Sorvaia. P£. •
Glenn R. Cook. PC • Robert G Schumchf. PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. P£ •
Robert W Rosene. PE. Richard E Turner. PE and Susan M Cberiin. C PA . Senior Consultants
Associate Principals Howard A. Sanford. PE • Ke»th A. Gordon. PE- • Robert R. Pfefferle. PE. •
Richard W Foster. PE • David O Loskota. PE. • Robert C Russek. A I.A. • Mark A. Hanson. PE. •
Michael r. Rautmann. PE • Ted K Field. PE. • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolfs. PC. •
Sidney P Williamson. PE. L S • Robert F Kotsmith • Agnes M Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE.
Offices: St. Paul. Rochester. Wiiimar and St Cloud. MN • Wiiw.iukee. wi
WeOsite WWW bonestroo com
August 17, 1999
Mr. Jack Brinkhaus
Public Works Superv isor
City of Oronc
PO Bo.x 66
2750 Kelly Parkway
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Re: Well No. 1 Rehabilitation
BRA File No. 139-98-000
Dear Jack:
As requested, we have reviewed the construction and maintenance records for Well No. 1. Well No. 1 is
the larger of the two wells that supply the Navarre system. The pump was last inspected and repaired 10
years ago. Well pumps are typically inspected and repaired every 7 to 10 years.
.At this time. Well No. 1 is used for standby due to poor water quality and unusual operation. Well No. 2
was rehabilitated and redeveloped in 1997. Well No. 2 is meeting the water demands in the Navarre
System. The present operation of Well No. 1 can be summarized as follows:
The well capacity has not declined and is at approximately 1,200 gpm. The well is normally throttled to
1,000 gpm.
Water quality has appeared to decline in the last year, based on subjective observations of taste, color,
and odor. These problems may have worsened while the well was out of service during the water
treatment facility renovation. Although Well No. 1 had significant run time during the plant start-up,
water quality did not noticeably improve.
After the pump shuts off, water and air bubble out from cracks in the floor around the pump base. This
indicates mechanical problems with the top of the well, pump, or casing vent. The pump would need to
be pulled to determine the nature of the problem. At diis time, the inner casing is believed to be vented.
Due to the unusual construction of the well, a vent may also be needed on the outer casing to eliminate
this problem.
Maintenance History
The well and pump were new in 1971. The pump was repaired in 1978 and 1989. The 1989 pump repairs
consisted of:
Replacement of the pump bowl assembly and tailpipe.
Replacement of most of the 10-foot column pipes. Nineteen of the twenty-eight column pipes were
replaced.
Replacement of one stainless steel IQ-foot lineshaft. The remaining lineshafts are non-sleeved stainless
steel and were flipped end-for-end to obtain a fresh wear surface at the bearing locations.
2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651-636*4600 ■ Fax: 651*636*1311
1
1
• Replacement of the rubber lineshaft bearings. The bearing retainers may also have been replaced.
• A quick cleaning of the well by airlifting.
• The 1989 pump repairs had a construction cost of $17,200, and did not include any significant well
inspection, maintenance, or motor repairs.
Well Construction
A copy of the well construction diagram is attached for your reference. Well No. 1 was drilled in 1971 and
is finished in the Jordan Sandstone Formation, which is the most widely used aquifer in the Twin Cities
area. There are several unusual features about Well No. 1.
Most Jordan wells terminate with an open hole or a developed cavity in the Jordan Sandstone, which is
overlain by a thick limestone formation in most areas. The limestone acts as a ceiling and prevents the
collapse of surface materials into the well cavity. At Well No. 1, the overlying limestone formation is
absent. Therefore, Well No. I was finished with a screen and gravel pack out of necessity.
Screened wells require occasional maintenance to clean build-up and deposits fi-om the screen and gravel
pack. Such deposits can contribute to water quality problems. Based on the available records, only
minimal cleaning has been required since the well was drilled. A cleaning of the screen and gravel pack
should be performed if inspection of the screen indicates excessive deposits.
Well No. 1 has a 24-inch outer casing to a depth of 273 feet and a 12-inch casing to a depth of 315 feet
The screen extends down to 385 feet. The annular space outside of the screen and between the casings is
filled with a gravel pack to the surface. By today’s standards, gravel packs must extend no more than 10
feet above the screen, and annular spaces between casings must be completely filled with grout to provide a
good seal into the aquifer. In addition, grouted wells usually have longer service lives.
Due to the construction of the well, Well No. 1 could become susceptible to contamination firom shallow
groundwater if the outer well casing deteriorates. When the pump is running, the water level is drawn
down approximately 200 feet. If the outer casing were deteriorated, the higher external pressure of shallow
groundwater would cause the shallow groundwater to leak into the gravel pack. If the outer casing is not
vented, a vacuum would be created in the gravel pack, which would increase the leakage rate.
Due to '.he age and construction of the well, the condition of the inner casing and screen should be
determi.ied by a downhole video camera inspection. Unfortunately, there is no practical way to determine
the condition of the outer well casing. At some fumre time, it may be possible to remove the gravel pack
and fully grout the space between casings. This would be a difficult and expensive project. Such a project
would be warranted if surficial contaminants show up in significant quantities in the well. We are not
aware of any such contamination at this time.
Well No. 2
There are several factors about Well No. 2 that relate to Well No. 1:
• Well No. 2 is 270 feet deep, and pumps from sand and gravel deposits just above the Jordan Sandstone.
Therefore, a difference in water quality between Well No. 1 and Well No. 2 is not surprising.
• Well No. 2 has a single casing and is not grouted. The televising performed in 1997 showed that the
casing is in generally good condition. Therefore, the Well No. I outer casing should be in generally
good condition since the casings penetrate the same soils, subsurface materials, and are of the same age.
Well and Pump Maintenance
2.
3.
The following well and pump maintenance program is recommended:
I. Remove and inspect the pump components, including the motor. Replace or rebuild components as
necessary.
Inspect the well by downhole camera.
Based on the initial inspection, the following well maintenance measures may be appropriate:
a. Repair suspected mechanical problems near the top of the w'ell and / or add a vent to the
outer casing.
b. Clean the casing by wire brushing. A stiff brush made of steel cable ends and heavy
weights is worked up and down in intervals by a drill rig to clean well casings.
c. Clean the screen and gravel pack by methods s"''!i as iugh velocity water jetting, air lifting,
and chemical treatment.
The well should be re-televised after casing and screen cleaning.
Re-installation of the pump and motor.
Pump to waste until the water clears.
Water quality testing as appropriate.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Buslgst
The construction cost of well and pump maintenance is expected to be in the range of $25,000 to $50,000.
Costs can be better defined after the pump has been removed and the pump components and well are
inspected. For budget purposes, we have assumed that the casing and screen are in ge -ally sound
condition. Due to the anticipated project costs, procurement should follow standard City bidding
procedures. Engineering and inspection costs of $7,000 are estimated. At this time, an overall budget of
$55,000 is recommended. For reference, the total project cost of the Well No. 2 rehabilitation was $36,000.
Schedule
This project could proceed as follows:
August 1999: Prepare plans and specifications
September 21,1999:
October 1,1999:
November 15,1999:
Open construction bids
Begin construction
Project completion
Please feel free to call me at (651) 604-4797 with any questions you may have on this submittal.
Sincerely,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLDC & ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Hemming \J
cc: Greg Gappa - City of Orono
Barry Rathbun - City of Orono
i
• «
WELL NO. 1 .
ORONO, MINNESOTA
LAYNE MINNESOTA COMPA^
j.*
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: September 8, 1999
ITEM NO:
Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Name RonMoorse h/iL City Administrator's
Title City Administrator m____Rqjort
Item Description: Proposed 2000 Budget and Tax Levy - Resolutions
Attachments:1. Tax Levies - Actual 1999 vs. Proposed 2000
2. Tax Capacity, Local Levy, and Tax Capacity Rates
3 . Effect of 2000 Tax Levy and Budget on Homes
4. Resolution Adopting the Proposed 1999 Tax Levy Collectible in 2000
5. Resolution to Adopt the Proposed 2000 Budget
Proposed 2000 Budget
The proposed 2000 budget addresses a number of increased service needs, particularly in the public
safety area, while holding the tax levy to a moderate increase.
Tax Levy, Tax Capacity Rate, and Impact on Property Owners
The total tax levy required to fund the proposed 2000 budget is $2,363,560. This is an increase of
$71,680 or 3.13% over the 1999 levy. The proposed levy amount is at the City's levy limit. The
estimated tax capacity for taxes payable in the year 2000 is $15,750,937. This is an increase of
$1,035,895 or 7.04% over the 1999 tax capacity.
Based on the City's tax capacity and the proposed tax levy, the proposed tax capacity rate is 14.637.
This is a 3.55% reduction from the 1999 tax capacity rate. Based on the reduction in the City's tax
capacity rate, and assuming no change in property value, the City's share of the property tax bill on
a home valued at $ 100,000 would decrease by $9.19 or 5.1%. For a home valued at $400,000, the
City's share of the property tax bill would decrease by $59.09 or 6.1%.
General Fund Budget Expenditures
General Fund expenditures are highlighted as part of the proposed budget information because they
have the greatest impact on the tax levy. The proposed 2000 General Fund budget expenditures are
$4,053,480. This is an increase of $203,480 or 5 28% over the 1999 budget. The main items
causing the expenditure increase are as follows:
A.Annual compensation adjustments
(based on a 3% pay increase)
$76,470
Request for Council Action continued
Page 2
September 8, 1999
Proposed 2000 Budget and Tax Levy - Resolutions
B New expenditures related to the hiring of an
additional police officer
$52,000
C.Market-based pay adjustments to bring
the City's pay levels in line with those of
comparable cities
$30,000
The costs of hiring a new police chief by
October 1,2000 to provide a 3-month overlap
period prior to the current chiefs retirement
$20,000
E Increased operating costs related to upgrading
to the LOGIS police records system
$14,500
F. Increased funding for fire vehicle/equipment
replacement
$10,000
The additional police officer is proposed in response to increasing police service demands. The
Police Department is experiencing increased demand from the public for greater police visibility,
increased traffic enforcement, and narcotics enforcement. The Department is also receiving requests
for greater involvement in community-oriented policing activities and domestic abuse prevention
activities. Also, the State continues to increase the amount cf training required for police officers,
which reduces the amount of time they are on the street. It is anticipated increased development in
Orono and adjacent cities, increased use of the Lake Minnetonka area for recreational purposes, and
the reconstruction of Highway 12 will cause continued increasing demand for police services.
Sewer and Water Fee Increases
As called for by the City's plan for funding long-term repair and replacement of the City’s water and
sewer infrastructure, the proposed budget reflects a 2.7% increase in water rates and a 3.2% increase
in sewer rates.
Adoption of Proposed Budget and Tax Levy
The City is required to adopt a budget and tax levy so that the levy can be certified to the County
by September 15, and so that a summary of the budget can be published along with the notice of the
Tmth in Taxation hearing in November After adoption, the proposed tax levy cannot be increased,
but can be reduced prior to final budget adoption following the Truth in Taxation hearing in
December. The proposed budget can also be changed prior to final adoption in December.
Resolutions adopting the preliminary 2000 budget and proposed tax levy are attached for Council
adoption.
Request for Council Action continued
Page 3
September 8, 1999
Proposed 2000 Budget and Tax Levy - Resolutions
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Motion to adopt a resolution approving the proposed tax levy to fund the 2000 budget,
2. Motion to adopt a resolution approving the proposed 2000 budget.
*
1
CITY OF ORONO
TAX LEVIES
ACTUAL 1999 vs PROPOSED 2(
TAX LEVIES
TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE
1999 2000
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
TAX LEVY SUBJECT TO LEVY LI _U5M80
SEWER & WATER BONDS
1995 Refunding 1985
1995 Refunding 89 Wir Rev
1992
1997
1999
BUILDING BONDS-HRA 1991
TAX LEVY FOR BONDED DEBT
TOTAL TAX LEVIES
(a) Levy amounts in levy limit
Levy Limit available for use
Actual levy ovcr/(undcr) limit
1,943,860 86,980
PERCENT
CHANGE
GENERAL $1,771,430 (a)$1,858,410 (a)$86,980 4.91%
INFRASTRUCTURE (PIR)80,450(a)80,450 (a)0 0.00%
PARK LAND ACQ AND DEVEL 5,000(a)5,000 (a)0 0.00%
30,000 15,000 (15,000)-50.00%
100,000 75,000 (25,000)-25.00%
45,000 45,000 0 0.00%
10,000 15,000 5,000 50.00%
0 19,700 19,700 —
250,000 250,000 0 0.00%
435,000 419,700 (15,300)•3.52%
_ $2,291,880__$2,363,5^$71,680 3.13%
“increase PERCENT
1999 2000 (DECREASE)CHANGE
1,856,880 1,943,860 86,980 4.68%
1.904.142 1.94.1.866 39,724 2.09%
(47.262J 47.2.56 0
I
City of Orono
Tax Capacity, Local Levy, & Tax Capacity Rates
2000 Over (Under) 1999
Actual Estimated
TAX CAPACITY 1999 2000 Amount Percent
Real Estate .$14,71-5,042 $15,750,937 $1,035,895 7.04%
Personal Property 163,936 165,000 1,064 0.65%
Deduct Tax Increments 0 0 0 0.00%
Deduct Contrib Fiscal Disp (261,649)(270,000)(8,351)3.19%
Net Tax Capacity (To calculate rate)$14,617,329 $15,645,937 $1,028,608 7.04%
LOCAL LEVY
Gross Levy $2,527,810 $2,673,111 $145,301 5.75%
Deduct HACA (302,528)(309,551)(7,023)2.32%
TOTAL LEVY NET OF HACA $2,225,282 $2,363,560 $138,278 6.21%
Deduct Fiscal Disparities (41,806)(42,000)(194)0.46%
Net Local Levy $2,183,476 $2,321,560 $138,084 6.32%
TAX CAPACITY RATES
General Revenue 11.887%11.667%-0.220%-1.85%
PIR Infrastucture-Storm Sewer 0.302%0.283%-0.020%-6.47%
PIR Infrastructure-Roads 0.238% 0.223% -0.015% -6.49%
Parks - Land Acquisition & Development 0.034%0.031% -0.003%—
Debt Service 1.241%1.065%-0.176%-14.15%
HRA Building Bonds 1.678%1.569%-0.109%-6.47%
Total Local Tax Capacity Rate 15.380%14.838%____ _ -0.542%-3.52%
TAX CAPACII'Y • The real estate and personal propcny tax capacity amounts arc reduced by any tax increments and the contribution amount to the
fiscal disparities to arrive at the total value of tax capacity used for calculating the tax capacity rate.
LOCAL LEVY • The amount of gross tax is reduced by the state paid I lACA (I lomcstcad and Agricultural Credit Aid), and by the Fiscal Disparities
distributed through the county.
TAX CAPACITY RA'IT, - The net local levy amount is divided by the tax capacity to arrive at a percentage or tax capacity rate.
i
i
City of Orono
Effect of 2000 Tax Levy & Budget on Homes
Market Value for 1999 Taxes SI 00.000 $200,000
1999 2000 2000
0% incr 5% incr
1999 2000
Estimated Market Value
For 1999 Taxes
Tax Capacity (Net) •
Tax Capacity Rate
Net Tax
SI 00.000
1,175
1 5.380%
SI 80.72
S$ Increase (Decrease) from 1999
$100.000
1,1.56
14.838%
$171.53
($9.19)
$105,000
!■;
$200,000
1.239;
14.838%
$183.77!
2,875
15.380%
$442.18
I ^
$3.05
% Increase (Decrease) from 1999 -5.1%1.7%
$200.000
2,806
14.838%
$416.35
($25.82)
..4
♦ 1999 Tax Capacity (net) = 1 % of first $75,000 market value, plus 1.70% of all value over $75,000
2000 Tax Capacity (net) = 1% of first $76,000 market value, plus 1.65% of all value over $76,000
i i
2000 '•i
0% incr 5% incr i
1
$210.000 I
•t
2,971
14.838% [ .
$440.84 i
\ 5(S1.34).
I
-5.8% -0.3%
1999
$400.000
6,275
15.380%
$965.10
$400,000
2000
$400.000
6,106
14.838%
$906.01
($59.09)
-6.1%
2000
0% incr 5% incr
$420.000
6,436
14.838%
$954.97
($10.12)
-1.0%
i
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED 1999
TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2000
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin,
Minnesota, that the following sums; as reduced by HACA, be levied for the current year, collectible
in 2000 upon the taxable property in the City of Orono, for the following purposes:
General Fund - Operating
PIR Fund - Infrastructure Replacement (Storm Sewer)
PIR Fund - Infrastructure Replacement (Road)
Park Fund - Land Acquisition and Development
G.O. Sewer Improvement Bond 1992
G.O. Improvement Bond 1997
G.O. Refunding Bond 1995 - (Debt Fund)
G.O. Refunding Bond 1995 - (Operating Funds)
Public Facilities Revenue Bond 1991 - HRA
G.O. Improvement Bond 1999
TOTAL ALL LEVIES
$1,858,410
45,000
35,450
5,000
45.000
15.000
15.000
75.000
250,000
19,700
S2.363.560
The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the
County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held
September 13,1999.
ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
LIN\BUDGETM9WROLEVY RES
' /
A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE PROPOSED 2000 BUDGET
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota that the
proposed 2000 governmental funds budgets are determined to be as follows:
Fund
Special Debt Capital
General Revenue Service Projects
ESTIMATED REVENUES
Taxes - General SI,8S8,4I0 S5,000 $344,700 $80,450
Special Assessments --314,590 12,450
Licenses and Permits 264,000 ———
Intergovernmental 563,780 ——200,000
Charges for Services 1,108,390 mm mm —
Fines and Forfeits 84,000 ———
Interest Income 100,000 162,690 81,890 30,000
Miscellaneous 29,900 62,660 ——
Transfers From Other Funds 105,000 130,000 -
Total Revenues and
Other Financing Sources $4,008,480 $335,350 $871,180 $322,900
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
General Government $847,430 ———
Public Safety 2,170,560 —-—
Street Maintenance 519,040 mm -—
Parks and Recreation 65,820 ——
Recycling Program 79,580 ---
Engineering • Unallocated 9,150 —-—
Reimbursable Expenditures 56,050 —--
Special Projects and Contingency 92,000 ---
Debt Service - Principal —-$525,000 —
Interest and Fiscal Charges mm —393,925 mm
Capital Outlay 108,850 $166,050 -$270,450
Transfers To Other Funds 105,000 130,000 --
Total Expenditures and
Other Financing Uses $4,053,480 $296,050 $918,925 $270,450
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held September 13,1999.
ATTEST:
Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Linda S. Vce, City Clerk
TOMJlfiSMrBD
-tinq
SEP I
REQVEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITVo.
^ 1999
I.
DATE: Septembers, 1999
ITEM NO:/S
Department Approval:
Name Ron Moorse
Title Cit\’ Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
Cit>' Administrator's
Report
Item Description: Establishment of Dates for the Truth in Taxation Hearings
Attachment: Calendar of Dates A\-ailable for Truth in Taxation Hearings
The City is required to select dates for an initial Truth in Taxation hearing, and for a continuation
hearing. On the basis of the available dates, it is staffs recommendation to set the initial public
hearing for 7;00 p.m. on Monday, December 6, 1999 at the City Council Chambers, and to set the
continuation hearing for 7:00 p.m. on Monday, December 13, 1999 at the City Council Chambers.
If a continuation hearing is not required, the final tax levy and budget may be adopted at subsequent
hearing which can be held at 7:00 p.m on Monday. December 13, 1999, prior to the regular Council
meeting. (In this case, the Council would announce the time and place for the subsequent hearing
to officially adopt the final tax levy and budget at the initial Truth in Taxation hearing.)
If a continuation hearing is required, the Council will then decide on a subsequent hearing date ^d
time to officially adopt the final tax levy and budget, and must announce it at the continuation
hearing. (The hearing to officially adopt the tax levy and budget may be held immediately following
the continuation hearing.)
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to set the initial Truth in Taxation public hearing for 7:00 p.m., Monday, December 6,19999
at the Orono Council Chambers, and to set the continuation hearing, if required, for 7:00 p.m.,
Monday, December 13, 1999 at the Orono Council Chambers.
1
C'"'* f*'•^^ETINQ
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
■ScP I 3 1999
c'^oFoncjNo
DATE: September 8, 1999
I6ITEM NO:
Department Approval:
Name RonMoorsc
Title City Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator's
Report
Item Description: Establishment of Date for Tax Rate Hearing
A new law passed in the 1999 State legislative session requires that all cities over 500 population
and all counties must hold a public hearing and pass a resolution if the levy for the upcoming year
increases such that, in the absence of an increase in tax capacity, the tax capacity rate would need
to be increased. Very simply, what this means is that generally if a city is increasing its tax levy,
it needs to hold this public hearing
This requirement was passed due to a concern that cities and counties were claiming they were
freezing taxes; when in fact the les'y was increasing but the tax rate was frozen due to tax base
growth. Under the law, the local government calculates what its tax rate would be in the coming
year if the levy was held constant. Essentially, a baseline tax rate is calculated based on the prior
year’s levy and the current year tax base. If the levy will result in an increase in the tax rate over the
baseline tax rate, the City Council must adopt a resolution at a public hearing to approve the tax rate.
The resolution must be filed with the County Auditor by October 20 of each year The information
necessary to calculate the baseline tax rate will not be provided by the County Auditor until October
1. Based on this timeline, staff recommends holding the public hearing and adopting a resolution
at the October 11 Council meeting.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to schedule a public hearing regarding the City's tax rate for 7:00 p.m. on Monday, October
11, 1999.
1
¥
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
't- MfiETINQ
'3*
‘'"•0«OiVo
DATE: September 8, 1999
ITEM NO: /
Department Approval:
Name RonMoorse
Title City Administrator
Admin..'trator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator's
Rqjort
Item Description: Resignation of Kristine Jenson from the Assistant Zoning Administrator Position
Kristine Jenson has submitted her resignation from the Assistant Zoning Administrator position
effective September 10, 1999 to take a position with the City of Hastings' Planning Department.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to accept the resignation of Kristme Jenson from the position of Assistant Zoning
Administrator effective September 10, 1999.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING
5EP I 3
DATE: September^EfT?
ITEM NO:/S
Department Approval:
Name RonMoorse
Title City Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator’s
Rqjort
Item Description; Appointment of Wendy Bottenberg to the Position of Assistant Zoning
Administrator
Wendy Bottenberg has served as a Planning Intern for the City since the spring of 1999. During this
time, she has assisted the full-time Planning staff in many areas, including the review of variance
applications. She has presented staff reports on variance applications to the Planning Commission.
She has not had an opportunity to present to the Council, as the variance applications have been
placed on the Council's consent agenda. Wendy was also heavily involved in preparing the handout
materials for the City's Comprehensive Plan Update Open Houses. Wendy's intern experiences have
provided her with the knowledge and experience she needs to move into the Assistant Zoning
Administrator position.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to appoint Wendy Bottenberg to the position of Assistant Zoning Administrator at the Level
6, Step 1 salary of $30,851, effective September 14, 1999.
MEETING
StP I 3 1999
Cii I ur OftO/vo
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: September 8, 1999
ITEM NO: / 7
Department Approval:
Name RonMoorse
THk City Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator's
Rq)Ort
Item Description: Public Works Land Expansion Options
The City has a need for additional land for Public Works-related activities, particularly a brush
disposal site and a leaf composting site. These activities require approximately 2 additional acres
of land. The Council recently directed staff to obtain an appraisal on a 12-acre portion of the
property located just east of the City's Public Works facility. The 12 acres would have provided
suflBcient space for the brush and leaf sites, and would have provided substantial additional land for
future needs. The cost of the 12 acres, based on an appraisal conducted by the County Assessor ’s
Office, was substantially higher than the Council was willing to spend. Staff has now developed a
set of Public Works land expansion options for consideration by the Council. These options are as
follows:
1 . Purchase 3.4 acres of land to the east of the Public Works facility, rather than the 12
acres.
Advantag es:
A. The site is adjacent to the existing Public Works yard area, making it
convenient and efficient to use.
B The site can be easily secured from vehicular access, as the only vehicular
entrance would be through the gate to the Public Works yard.
C. This option would provide approximately 2 acres of dry land for Public
Works activities.
Activities on this site could be screened from adjacent properties.
The acquisition of this land would eliminate the possibility of residential use
directly adjacent to the more active Public Works yard area, which could
create conflicts.
Disadvantag es:
The cost of acquisition is higher than the other alternatives.
v1. ,
Request for Council Action continued
Page 2
September 8, 1999
Public Works Land Expansion Options
2.
3.
B Because the property is wooded, tree removal would be required to create an
open work area.
C. To provide a contiguous work area could require some wetland filling and
mitigation.
Purchase land fi’om the Orono School District to the north and east of the City Public
Works facilities.
Advantages:
The site is adjacent to the existing Public Works yard area.
B The site would be secure for vehicular access.
C. The site could provide 2 acres of land for Public Works activities.
D. Activities could be screened fi’om adjacent properties.
E. The cost of acquisition should be lower than Option 1.
Disadvantages:
A.The site would be closer to both the Middle School and potential residential
development to the east than would Option 1.
B. Use of the site would require tree removal.
C.The School District may want to lease the land rather than sell it, in which
case this option would not necessarily be a permanent solution.
There has been interest expressed in this land by youth athletic associations
regarding using it for athletic fields.
Fill the existing wetland that is just west of the Public Works yard area. (The
wetland filling would be mitigated by the creation of new wetlands on land owned
by the City adjacent to McCuUey Road.)
Advantages:
The site is adjacent to the existing Public Works yard area.
9-» *
Request for Council Action continued
Page 3
September 8, 1999
Public Works Land Expansion Options
B Secure vehicular access.
C.
D
E.
This option would provide an additional 2 acres of useable yard area that
would enable a brush site and a compost site.
Activities would be screened from adjacent properties.
There would be no cost for land acquisition.
Disadvantages:
I
B
This option would require the filling of wetlands. The wetland filling would
need to be mitigated by the creation of new wetlands on land owned by the
City.
This option would not provide land for future Public Works needs beyond the
brush site and compost site.
Use City-owned land adjacent to McCulley Road for a brush disposal site and leaf
compost site.
Advantages:
A. No land acquisition costs.
B. Provides sufficient land for a brush site and leaf compost site.
Disadvantages:
A. This site would be remote from the current Public Works facility, making it
less convenient and less efficient to use.
B It would be difficult to maintain the security of the property. The site would
have to be at least partially fenced and gated. The City would have to
provide a staff person to monitor the site whenever the gate was open. Even
with a fenced area, the site would likely experience unlawful dumping.
Request for Council Action continued
Page 4
September 8, 1999
Public Works Land Expansion Options i
Funding
On a short-term basis, the funding for the acquisition of additional Public Works land could be
provided from the General Fund reserves or from the Building Fund. On a medium-term basis, the
short-term funding source could be reimbursed at the time the City sells the 2-acre parcel at the
comer of Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road.
StafT Recommendation
Staffs recommended options in order of preference are as follows:
1 . Purchase the 3.4 acres from the Orono Plaza Partnership,
2.Purchase land from the School District.
3. Fill the existing wetland adjacent to the Public Works yard.
Staff recommends pursuing both Options 1 and 2 by contacting the property owners to determine
the potential acquisition costs, and to determine whether the property owners would consider selling
the land to the City.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to direct staff to further pursue Options 1 and 2, and to report staffs findings to the Council.i
iM£ni tfj,
t • «' .mmmm■> *■• '-•W'T-* •?
m
'41^-^
.'A^.-,-.- “c-a
.1
^ r- f*
■ M ..'*• -J «4f)P-«**.*
IIPI^
W., '• '-' >'
''; ■ ■ ^'r'«
■ ■ ;j»- ■■V Pj
KW'-
Sfer/'''-'’'"-"'^’*
XlrnSmS9. k';:- ".
m
;''^A^'aVL:
r,Lii^i»>.*:‘.*A't''-‘ ^m: ■
w-»rv
'••f i
P1«*' J
*4.
5C'■ U ~r 4
♦«( '-<•
• V-
^ .f;’?*V'
. J V
.t
xy "
■J^ .
"^.r
'r. ’V 5%-
as*
»Jv * * 41 . ’
J I- ■>
' ■‘ j/'•'''"if'‘' '•
*•.'-'‘J,'-
m
NtWORONd^
v/:-""/-’d^ L
^ • i*-i
'%r T ”
M 1
» »
* ft ^ ^ i-
'f:N •f!'
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
COUNCIL MEETINQ
SEP I 3 1999
DATE: September 10,1999
ITEM NO: 0
1
Department Approval:
Name RonMoorse
THIe City Administrator
Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:
City Administrator's
Rq>ort
Item Description: Matching of Private Donations for the Purchase of Police Squad Video Cameras
The North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition has recently received donations in the amount of
$10,000 for the purchase of two in-squad video cameras for the Police Department. Chief Cheswick
has indicated these are high priority items, but are beyond the level of funding provided in the
normal budget process.
The video cameras are activated when the officer makes a traffic stop or other contact. The cameras
record the officer's interaction with the person(s) during the contact. As such, they are useful in
providing evidence in cases such as a DWl arrest. The existence of this evidence often discourages
the person from appealing the arrest in court. The cameras are also useful in disproving false
allegations of improper conduct by police officers.
The Council has discussed using the General Fund year-end surplus for special projects or
expenditures such as this. If the amount of the donation was matched with General Fund surplus
funds, an additional two cameras could be purchased. This would provide a video camera in each
of the Department's 24 hour squads. An additional $5,000 would provide a fifth video camera for
the power car, which is a 40 hour per week squad.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion regarding the authorization of the use of General Fund surplus funds for the purchase of in
squad video cameras.
\
1
?•
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
COUNCIL MEETING
SEP 1 3 1999.
CITY Ut- Unut4Q
DATE: September 9, 1999
ITEM NO; ^ /
Department Approval:
Name Lin Vee
THIe City Clerk
Administrator Reviewed:
Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval
Agenda Section:
Licenses
ONE DAY GAMBLING - RESOLUTION
I. Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc.
Sunday, January 23, 2000
GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT RENEWAL - RESOLUTION
1, Minnesota Multiple Sclerosis Society
Jimmies Lounge
3380 Shoreline Drive
HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE
1 Allstar Electric
(Electric)
Ben Meinhardt
3585 Sixth Avenue North
Long Lake, MN 55356
2.Guardsman Wood Pro
(Furniture Repair)
Bruce Mathison
5 Brown Road South
Long Lake, MN 55356
■1
3.L A. Pilgram, D C.
(Chiropractic Office)
LeRoy A. Pilgram, D C,
1795 Shadywood Road
Navarre, MN 55392
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses,
UaSUHM
i- V
1' t
Date:September 9, 1999
To:Lin Vee, City Clerk
From: Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police ^
Subject: Application for Gambling Permit
I have reviewed the application submitted by the Orono Hockey Boosters for a one
day gambling permit on January 23,2000.
1 have no objection to the issuance of the permit.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF
ORONO HOCKEY BOOSTERS, INC. FOR
A ONE DAY OFF-SITE GAMBLING PERMIT
WHEREAS, the Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc. are licensed to conduct lawful
gambling activities; and
WHEREAS, the Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc. proposed to conduct a one day oflf-site
gambling activity (raffle) as part of its annual pancake breakfast at the Orono High School on
January 23, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc. is required to obtain approval of the
oflf-site gambling activity from the city in which the activity will occur.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Orono City Council does hereby
approve the application of the Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc. to conduct a one day oflf-site gambling
activity (raffle) at the Orono High School on January 23, 2000.
1999
Adopted at a regular meeting of the Orono City Council this 13 th day of September,
ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
RESOORDUnCKEYMJUES Page 1 of 1
Date:September 9,1999
To:Lin Vee, City Clerk
From: Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police
Subject: Gambling Permit Application
I have reviewed the application submitted by the Multiple Sclerosis Society for
gambling at Jimmies Lounge, 3380 Shoreline Drive, Orono.
I have no objection to the issuance of a permit.
i
J
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
RENEWAL OF GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT
FOR JIMMIES LOUNGE
LOCATED AT 3380 SHORELINE DRIVE
4,
U
BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Orono agrees to approve the renewal gambling
permit application for the Minnesota Multiple Sclerosis Society for operations at Jimmies Lounge,
3380 Shoreline Drive.
The above lisied resolution was moved by
and duly seconded by ________________________
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting
held on the 13th day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
APPLICATION FOR ANNUAL HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE ____
CITY OF ORONO "
2750 KELLEY PARKWAY, P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
^» Y Or CROiVo
•);P 21999
NAME:
ADDRESS:
street
P1K)NE: b^^'S^S‘7
city/s^^^/
BUSINESS NAME: ______________
TYPE OF BUSINESS TO BE OPERATED: _________
Number of Employees Within Operation: / (Provide names of employees on bac^of application)
Check One: Initial Review Fee $50.00____Annual Review Fee $30.00 ^
License may be revoked if any violation occurs. City staff shall have five (5) business days in which to
investigate and maVe a recommendation pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.02 & 5.03. If a site
inspection is required by City staff, the review time wUl be extended to ten (10) business days. The license
application with staff recommendation will be scheduled before the Council at the next regularly scheduled
meeting held on the second and fourth Monday of each month.
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON HOME OCCUPATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 4 (C)
Prohibited Home Occupation Practices
1. It is unlawful for any business operating as a home occupation to engage in operation without
proper licenses.
2. All persons engaged in the business must reside in the dwelling.
3. No commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in the residential zone.
4. No excessive stock in trade may be stored on the premises.
5. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed.
6. Entrance to the home occupation must be gained from within the structure.
The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any
additional conditions the City may require.
Signature of Applicant: --------Date:
FOR CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends the following: T
_____Approval of application ______________Denial of application
Signature of Zoning Official: ----*
Signature of Building Official:
Applicatiou Date:Date License Approved:,
________Date: Z -^9
Date License Expired:____
‘ »
i'
USTING OF EMPLOYEES:
NAME: "
ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
cmr&ziP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CTTY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CTTYAZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CrrY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
i.
APPLICATION FOR ANNUAL HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE
CITY OF ORONO
2750 KELLEY PARKWAY, P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
NAME: "?) y C. |SQ
ADDRESS: CT
___________ PHONE:
BUSINESS NAME: GvAt^vCj^QO^V/0
city/state
TYPE OF BUSINESS TO BE OPERATED: Nrv»Vt^\V\/‘>Vv^ \ 'f A
Number of Employees Within Operation:_)__ (Provide names of employees on back of application) ^
Check One: Initial Review Fee $50.00 __ Annual Review Fee $30.00 v ^
License may^be revoked if any violation occurs. City staff shall have five (5) business days in which to
investigate and "laV# a recommendation pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.02 & 5.03. If a site
inspection is required by City staff, the review time will be extended to ten (10) business days. The license
^plication with staff recommendation will be scheduled before the Council at the next regularly scheduled
meeting held on the second and fourth Monday of each month.
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON HOME OCCUPATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 4 (C)
Prohibited Home Occupation Practices
1. It is unlawful for any business operating as a home occupation to engage m operation without
proper licenses.
2. All persons engaged in the business must reside in the dwelling.
3. No commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in the residential zone.
4. No excessive stock in trade may be stored on the premises.
5. Over the coimter retail sales is not allowed.
6. Entrance to the home occupation must be gained from within the structure.
The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any
additional conditions the: City may require.
JOu Da«:Signature of Applicant:;
FOR CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommen^ the following:
______^ Approval of application ________Denial of application
Signature of Zoning Official
Signature of Building Official:• ^7
Application Date:Date License Approved:Date License Expired:
—*^-**^
USTING OF EMPLOYEES:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY & ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY&ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
cmr&ziP:
DATE OF BIRTH:
APPLICATION FOR ANNUAL HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE^^^'’ ^ ^ 1999
CITY OF ORONO CITY Or
2750 KELLEY PARKWAY, P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
NAME: LcP^t/ ___
^ I 'j lf<r ud/^£K/_A
PHON^: H 7/
I ' street
S NAME:
city/state zip
TYPE OF BUSINESS TO BE OPERATED: O f N^ T ^____________—-----:—:—
Number of Employees Within Operation: -^-^rovi^ names of employees on back of application)
Check One: Initial Review Fee $50.00____Annual Review Fee $30.00 r
License may be revoked if any violation occurs. City staff shall have five (5) business days in which to
investigate and make a recommendation pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.02 & 5.03. If a site
inspection is required by City staff, the review time will be extended to ten (10) business days. The bceme
application with staff recommendation will be scheduled before the CouncU at the next regularly scheduled
meeting held on the second and fourth Monday of each month.
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON HOME OCCUPATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 4 (C)
Prohibited Home Occupation Practices
1 . It is unlawful for any business operating as a home occupation to engage m operation witnout
proper licenses.
2. All persons engaged in the business must reside in the dwelling.
3! No commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in the residential zone.
4. No excessive stock in trade may be stored on the premises.
5. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed.
6. Entrance to the home occupation must be gained from within the structure.
The undersigned hereby..agf«es4aili^onditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any
additional conditions l^e City may rcquil
SignatureofApplici Date:
FOR CITY USE ONLY: After reviei^f application, staff recommen^ the following:
____Approval of application ________ Denial of application
Signature of Zoning Official:——d----------------------
Signature of Building Official:
Application Date:________Date License Approved:Date License Expired:
8 Sep 1999
Wed 8:31 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046491
046491 JOHNSON, MARY ANN
Totals Check Number 046491
Check Number 046492
C46492 BERRY« HEIDI N.
Totals Check Number 046492
Check Number 046493
046493 HASEMAN, CAROLE A.
Totals Check Number 046493
Check Number 046494
046494 MOORSE, RONALD J.
Totals Check Number 046494
Check Number 046495
046495 VBE, LINDA S.
Totals Check Number 046495
Check Number 046496
046496 KUEHN, THOMAS M.
Totals Check Number 046496
Check Number 046497
046497 OLSON, RONALD J.
Totals Check Number 046497
Check Number 046498
046498 PETTIT, SANDRA K.
Totals Check Number 046496
Check Number 046499
Check
rate
O0-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
O0-Sep“99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
Page 1
Check
Amount
512.45
512.45
658.82
658.82
719.30
719.30
1,591.00
1,591.00
1,073.72
1,073.72
1,018.58
1,018.58
28.53
28.53
651.12
651.12
MFPTINa
5fP ( 3 1999
8 Sep 1999
Wed 8:31 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check ^
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046499
046499 ANDERSON* BRUCE L.
Totals Check Number 046499
Check Number 046500
046500 BOBZIEN, SUE A.
Totals Check Number 046500
Check Number 046501
046501 BORIS* SCOTT W.
Totals Check Number 04650X
Check Number 046502
046502 CARbSON* MICHAEL B.
Totals Check Number 046502
Check Number 046503
046503 CHESWICK* GARY B.
Totals Check Number 046503
Check Number 046504
046504 CORNICK* JAMES L.
Totals Check Number 046504
Check Number 046505
046505 DEMBOUSKI* JAY C.
Totals Check Number 046505
Check Numoer 046506
046506 ERICKSON, KURT R
Totals Check Number 046506
Check Number 046507
- 046507 PARNIOK* CORREY L.
Check
Date
08-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
Page 2
Check
Amount
523.34
523.34
657.24
657.24
1*121.46
1*121.46
400.33
400.33
1*519.16
1,519.16
1*449.52
1*449.52
1*481.97
1*481.97
1,275.96
1,275.96
1,392.12
1
1
i
I ^1 r
8 Sep 1999
Wed 8:31 AM
Check Register
City o£ Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046507
Totals Check Number 046507
Check Number 046508
046508 FISCHENICH, DAN T.
Totals Check Number 046508
Check Number 046509
046509 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K
Totals Check Number 046509
Check Number 046510
046510 JOHNSON, JEFFREY
Totals Check Number 046510
Check Number 046511
046511 JOICISON, BRADLEY P.
Totals Check Number 046511
Check Number 046512
046512 MADSON, ADRIENNE M.
Totals Check Number 046512
Check Number 046513
046513 MCNALLY, STEVEN A.
Totals Check Number 046513
Check Number 046514
046514 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L.
Totals Check Number 046514
Check Number 046515
046515 MOROWCZYNSKI, JAMES
Check
Date
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
Page 3
Check
Amount
1,392.12
1,151.21
1,151.21
1,133.93
1 133.93
395.89
395.89
1,354.85
1,354.85
416.73
416.73
1,058.50
1,058.50
735.82
735.82
1,566.22
A
• II
♦ O
8 Sep 1999
Wed 8:31 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046515
Totals Check Number 046515
Check Number 046516
046516 SCHOENWOFF, JOHN B.
Totals Check Number 046516
Check Number 046517
046517 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F.
Totals Check Number 046517
Check Number 046518
046510 TOMCZYK, MARK W.
Totals Check Number 046510
Check Number 046519
046519 WITTKE, ANTHONY A.
Totals Check Number 046519
Check Number 046520
046520 H0ECHST« ROBYN A.
Totals Check Number 046520
Check Number 046521
046521 KOCZUR, JASON R.
Totals Check Number 046521
Check Number 046522
046522 BOTTENBERG, WENDY C.
Totals Check Number 046522
Check Number 046523
046523 DAVIS« MARK L.
Totals Check Number 046523
Check
Date
O0-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
Page 4
Check
Amount
1,566.22
1,324.42
1,324.42
449.65
449.65
1,284.62
1,284.62
230.90
230.98
586.79
506.79
273.92
273.92
715.33
715.33
1,030.60
1,030.60
8 Sep 1999
Wed 8:31 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046523
Check Number 046524
046524 GAFFRON, MICHAEL P.
Totals Check Number 046524
Check Number 046525
C46525 GAPPA, GREGORY A.
Totals Check Number 046525
Check Number 046526
: 346526 JENSON, KRISTINE K.
Totals Check Number 046526
Check Number 046527
046527 OMAN, LYLE E.
Totals Check Number 046527
Check Number 046528
046528 PENCE, CHRISTOPHER M.
Totals Check Number 046528
Check Number 046529
046529 WEINBERGER, PAUL E.
Totals Check Number 046529
Check Number C-.6tjT
04653C BRINKHAUS, JOHN P.
Tcttals Check Number 046530
:hec«*. Number 046531
046531 DEBAZRE, DONALD L.
Totals Check Number 046531
Check
Date
08-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
Page 5
Check
Amount
1,170.62
1,170.62
1,575.69
1,575.69
938.46
938.46
315.34
315.34
042.71
042.71
1,065.26
1,065.26
1,123.02
1,123.02
920.15
920.15
' -p
1
•j
8 Sep 1999
Wed 8:31 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046532
046532 GREGORY, JAMES D.
Totals Check Number 046532
Check Number 046533
046533 HANSEN, STEVEN C.
Totals Check Number 046533
Check Number 046534
046534 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G.
Totals Check Number 046534
Check Number 046535
046535 OBRIEN, RANDY L.
Totals Check Number 046535
Check Number 046536
046536 PALMER, GREGORY A.
Totals Check Number 046536
Check Number 046537
046537 RATHBUN, BARRY J.
Totals Check Number 046537
Check Number 046538
046538 SKREEN, DALE S.
Totals Check Number 046538
Check Number 046539
046539 ABRAHANSON, FRED W.
Totals Check Number 046539
Check Number 046540
046540 BLAIR, JANIS A
Check
Date
O0-Sep-99
08-Sep*99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08>Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
Page 6
Check
Amount
591.57
591.57
654.01
654.01
620.63
620.63
402.20
402.20
872.66
872.86
888.32
888.32
642.99
642.99
164.71
164.71
125.42
.
a Sep 1999
Wed 8:31 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Humber Employee Name
Check Number 046540
Totals Check Number 046540
Check Number 046541
046541 DOCKEN, THOMAS W.
Totals Check Number 046541
Check Number 046542
046542 JOHNSON, JOSHUA E.
Totals Check Number 046542
Check Number 046543
046543 MCINTYRE, WILLIAM E.
Totals Check Number 046543
Check Number 046544
046544 OAS, DANIEL 0.
Totals Check Number 046544
Check Number 046545
046545 PETERSON, JACK W.
Totals Check Number 046545
Check Number 046546
046546 RAICHE, VICTORIA H.
r
Totals Check Number 046546
Check Number 046547
046547 ROSS, JOHN A.
Totals Check Number 046547
Check Number 046548
046548 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD E
Check
Date
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
Page 7
Check
Amount
125.42
489.28
489.28
205.69
205.69
260.75
260.75
98.63
98.63
295.31
295.31
100.66
100.66
111.55
111.55
1,097.20
8 Sep 1999
Wed 8:31 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 8
Check
Number Employee Name
Check
Date
Check
Amount
Check Number 046548
Totals Check Number 046548 1*097.20
Grand Total 45,437.27
24 Aug 1999
Tue 4til PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046427
046427 JOHNSON, MARY ANI4
Totals Check Number 046427
Check Number 046428
046428 BERRY, HEIDI N.
Totals Check Number 046428
Check Number 046429
046429 HASEMAN, CAROLE A.
Totals Check Number 046429
Check Number 046430
046430 MOORSE, RONALD J.
Totals Check Number 046430
Check Number 046431
046431 VEE, LINDA S.
Totals Check Number 046431
Check Number 046432
046432 EUEHN, THOMAS M.
Totals Check Number 046432
Check Number 046433
046433 OLSON, RONALD J.
Totals Check Number 046433
Check Number 046434
046434 PETTIT, SANDRA K.
Totals Check Number 046434
Check Number 046435
Check
Date
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
2S-Aug-99
Page 1
Check
Amount
530.83
530.83
694.21
694.21
742.42
742.42
1,591.08
1,591.08
1,073.72
1,073.72
1,018.58
1,018.58
28.53
28.53
377.44
377.44
24 Aug 1999
Tue 4:11 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Chf?k
!;umber Employee Name
Check Number 046435
046435 ANDERSON^ BRUCE L.
Totals Check Number 046435
Check Number 046436
046436 BOBZIEN, SUE A.
Totals Check Number 046436
Check Number 046437
046437 BORIS, SCOTT H.
Totals Check Number 046437
Check Number 046438
046438 CARLSON, MICHAEL B.
Totals Check Number 046438
Check Number 046439
046439 CHESWICK, GARY B.
Totals Check Number 046439
Check Number 046440
046440 CORNICK, JAMES L.
Totals Check Number 046440
Check Number 046441
046441 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C.
Totals Check Number 046441
Check Number 046442
046442 ERICKSON, KURT R
Totals Check Number 046442
Check Number 046443
- 046443 FARNIOR, CORREY L.
Check
Date
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
Page 2
Check
Amount
842.15
842.15
657.24
657.24
1,121.46
1,121.46
474.34
474.34
1,519.16
1,519.16
1,467.71
1,467.71
1,286.59
1,286.59
1,275.96
1,275.96
1,515.16
( 4
1
L
24 Aug 1999
Tue 4:11 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046443
Totals Check Number 046443
Check Number 046444
046444 PISCHENICH* DAN T.
Totals Check Number 046444
Check Number 046445
046445 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K
Totals Check Number 046445
Check Number 046446
046446 JOHNSON, JEFFREY
Totals Check Number 046446
Check Number 046447
046447 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P.
Totals Check Number 046447
Check Number 046448
046448 KNOLLENBERG, KRISTIN L.
Totals Check Number 046448
Check Number 046449
046449 MADSOH, ADRIENNE M.
Totals Check Number 046449
Check Number 046450
046450 MCNALLY, STEVEN A.
Totals Check Number 046450
Check Number 046451
04645X MCNICHOLS. DAVID L
Check
Date
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug*99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
Page 3
Check
Amount
1,515.16
1,202.93
1,202.93
1,090.11
1,090.11
668.12
668.12
1,704.90
1,704.90
149.06
149.06
380.86
380.86
1,128.45
1,128.45
855.8S
m
V
rj
M
24 Aug 1999
Tue 4til PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046451
Totals Check Number 046451
Check Numb-^r 046452
046452 MOROWCZYNSKI, JAMES
Totals Check Number 046452
Check Number 046453
046453 PERSELI WITMAM R.
Totals Chec^ Number 046453
Check Number 046454
C46454 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B.
Totals Check Number 046454
Check Number 046455
046455 TOMCHECK, LAVTRENCE F.
Totals Check Number 046455
Check Number 046456
046456 tONCZYK* MARK W.
Totals Check Number 046456
Check Number 046457
046457 WITTKE, ANTHONY A.
Totals Check Number 046457
Check Number 046458
046458 HOECHST, ROBYN A.
Totals Check Number 046458
check Number 046459
046459 KOCZUR. JASON R.
Totals Check Number 046459
Check
Date
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
Page 4
Check
Amount
855.85
1,706.84
1,706.84
352.55
352.55
1,292.41
1,292.41
366.31
366.91
1,284.62
1,284.62
558.58
558.58
572.24
572.24
295.45
295.45
i
't
24 Aug 1999
Tue 4:11 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number 046459
Check Number 046460
046460 BOTTENBERG, WENDY C.
Totals Check Number 046460
Check Number 046461
046461 DAVIS, MARK L.
Totals Check Number 046461
Check Number 046462
046462 GAFFRON, MICHAEL P.
Totals Check Number 046462
Check Number 046463
046463 GAPPA, GREGORY A.
Totals Check Number 046463
Check Number 046464
046464 JENSON, KRISTINE K.
Totals Check Number 046464
Check Number 046465
046465 OMAN, LYLE E.
Totals Check Number 046465
Check Number 046466
046466 PALMATEBR, DONALD M.
Totals Check Number 046466
Check Number 046467
046467 PENCE, CHRISTOPHER M.
Totals Chech Number 046467
Check
Date
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug -'9
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-9S
25*Aug-99
Page 5
Check
Amount
636.30
636.30
1,030.60
1,030.60
1,170.62
1,170.62
1,575.69
1,575.69
938.46
938.46
297.37
297.37
575.44
575.44
808.75
8C8.75
i
1
F
24 Aug 1999
Tue 4:11 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Number Q46466
046468 HECKMAN, STEPHEN J.
Totals Check Number 046468
Check Number 046469
046469 WEINBERGER, PAUL E.
Totals Check Number 046469
Check Number 046470
046470 BRINKHAUS, JOim P.
Totals Check Number 046470
Check Number 046471
046471 DEBAERE, DONALD L.
Totals Check Number 046471
Check Number 046472
046472 GREGORY, JAMES D.
Totals Check Number 046472
Check Number 046473
046473 HANSEN, STEVEN C.
Totals Check Number 046473
Check Number 046474
046474 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G.
Totals Check ’‘-.mber 046474
Check Number 046475
046475 OBRIEN, RANDY L.
Totals Check Nurrher 046475
Check Number 046476
« 046476 PALMER, GREGORY A.
Check
Date
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
2S-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25 Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
Page 6
Check
Amount
161.91
161.91
1,065.26
1,065.26
1,123.02
1,123.02
887.35
887.35
591.57
591.57
848.15
848.15
751.82
751.82
225.99
225.99
646.63
24 Aug 1999
Tue 4:11 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Employee Name
Check Nurjber 046476
Totals Check Number 046476
Check Number 046477
046477 RATHBUN, BARRY J.
Totals Check Number 046477
Check Number 046478
046478 SKREEN« DALE S.
Totals Check Number 046478
Check Number 046479
046479 ABRAHAMSON, FRED W.
Totals Check Number 046479
Check Number 046480
046480 DOCKEN* THOMAS N.
Totals Check Number 046480
Check Number 046491
046481 JOHNSON, JOSHUA B.
Totals Check Number 046481
Check Number 046482
046482 MCINTYRE, NILLIAM B.
Totals Check Number 046482
Check Number 046483
046483 OAS, DANIEL 0.
Totals Check Number 046483
Check Number 046484
046484 PETERSON, JACK W
%
Check
Date
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
2S-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
25-Aug-99
Page 7
Check
Amount
646.63
888.32
888.32
642.99
642.99
134.20
134.20
489.28
489.28
95.26
95.26
396.06
396.06
178.09
178.09
301.73
i
i
24 Aug 1999
Tue 4:11 PM
Check
Number Bmployee Name
Check Number 046484
Totals Check Number 046484
Check Number 04648S
046485 RAICHS, VICTORIA H.
Totals Check Number 046485
Check Number 046486
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 8
Check
Date
Check
Amount
301.73
25-Aug-99 67.10
67.10
M
8 Sep 1999
^fed 8:58 AM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
59662
59662 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
08-Sep-99 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
Totals Check Number 59662 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
Check Number 59663 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
59663
59663
59663
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
Totals Check Number 59663 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES
Check Number 59664 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
59664 08-Sep-99 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
Totals Check Number 59664 I04A RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
Check Number 59665 LAM ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
59665 08-Sep-99 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
Totals Check Number 59665 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE
Check Number 59666 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT
59666 08-Sep-99 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT
Totals Check Number 59666 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT
Check Number 59667 KN DEPT OP REVENUE
Check Number 596^9 PEBSCO/OBRA
59669 08-Sep-99 PEBSCO/OBRA
Transaction
Amount
6,589.00
6,589.00
3.476.57
3.476.57
8,217.06
15.170.20
275.00
275.00
0.00
0.00
179.51
179.51
59667 08-Sep-99 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 3,204.09
Totals Check Number 59667 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 3,204.09
Check Number 59668 ORCHARD TRUST CO.TRUSTEE/CUST
59668 08-Sep-99 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 932.68
59668 08-Sep-99 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 703.00
59668 08-Sep-99 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 327.00
Totals Check Number 59668 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 1,962.68
217.65
Page 1
Comments
SAVINGS W/H & TRANSFERRED
FICA k MEDICARE M/H
FICA.MEDCR CITY SHARE
FEDERAL WITHHOLDING
DEFERRED CCMP W/H
UNION DUES WH
SKREEN 80010755723
STATE TAX W/H
DEFCOMP-98995-01 D180
DEF COMP
DEi 'JOMP
OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H
1
8 Sep 1999
Hed 8:56
Check
Number
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 2
Date Hame
Check Number 59669 PEBSCO/OBRA
Totals Check Number 59669 PEBSCO/OBRA
Check Number 59670 PEBSCO/US CCNF OP MAYORS
59670 08-Sep-99 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS
Totals Check Number 59670 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS
Check Number 59671 PERA
59671
59671
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
PERA
PERA
Totals Check Number 59671 PERA
Check Number 59672 UNITED HAY
59672 08-Sep-99 UNITED HAY
Totals Check Number 59672 UNITED WAY
Transaction
Amount
217.65
Comments
2,221.70
2,221.70
USCM DEFERRED CCMP W/H
4,040.08
5,255.16
9,295 24
PERA EMPLOYEE W/H
PERA CITY SHARE
31.00
31.00
CHARITY DONATIONS W/H
10 Sep 1999
Fri 1:50 PM
Check
Number
•
Date Name
Check Register
City of Orono
Transaction
Amount Comments
Check Number
59674
59674 AIRTOUCH
Oa-Sep-99
CELLOLAR/BELLEVUE
AIRTOnCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 12.34 ON CALL PHONE
59674 08-Sep-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 12.35 ON CALL PHONE
59674 09-Sep-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 217.79 CELL PHONE SERVICE
59674 09-Scp-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 442.96 CELL PHONES
59674 OS-Sep-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 400.94 CELL PHONE SERVICE
Totals Check Number 59674 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 1,086.38
Page l
Check Number 59675 ANCHOR PAPER
59675 09-Sep>99 ANCHOR PAPER
Total* Check Number 59675 ANCHOR PAPER
Check Number 59676 ASLET
59676 lO-Sep-99 ASLET
Totals Check Number 59676 ASLET
Check Number 59677 AT fc T -
59677
59677
59677
08- Sep-99
09- Sep-99
09-Sep-99
AT a T
AT a T
AT a T
Totals Check Nunyber 59677 AT a T -
Check Number 59678 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES
59678
59678
59678
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES
AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES
AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES
Totals Check Number 59678 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES
Check Number 59679 AOQIES MOBILE CHEF
59679 08-Sep-99 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF
Totals Check Number 59679 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF
Check Number 59680 BANYON DATA SYSTEMS
59680 08-Sep-99 BANYON DATA SYSTEMS
Totals Check Number 59680 BANYOv DATA SYSTEMS
515.46
515.46
50.00
50.00
55.59
14.48
28.31
98.38
106.93
10.14
10.15
127.22
51.84
51.84
75.00
75.00
COPY PAPER
MBRSHP RENEWAL-TOMZCYK
CELL PHONE-SEPTIC INSP
LONG DISTANCE CHARGES
TAX AND ACCESS CHARGES
CELL PHONE SERVICE
CELL PHONE SERVICE
CELL PHONE SERVICE
HOT DOG, CHEESBURGER
WINDOWS SEMINAR-OLSON
10 Sep 1999
Fri 1:50 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 2
Check Transaction
Number Date Name Amount Comments
Check Number 59681 BEACK, SCOTT
59681 09-Sep-99 BEACK, SCOTT 210.00 GOLF BALLS
Totals Check Number 59681 BEACK, SCOTT 210.00
Check Number 59682 BELL & HOVfELL
59682 09-Sep-99 BELL a HOWELL 387.00 MAINT AGREE-ABR 2000
Totals Check Number 59682 BELL a HOWELL 387.00
Check Number 59683 BERGERSON-CASWELL INC.
59683 08-Sep-99 BERGERSON-CASWELL INC.2,022.50 INSTALLATION OF WTR METER
Totals Check Number 59663 BERGERSON-CASWELL INC.2,022.50
Check Number 59684 BIFFS INC.»
59684 09-Sep-99 BIFFS INC.133.52 PORTABLE - BIDERWOOD
59684 09-Sep-99 BIFFS INC.133.52 PORTABLE - SUMMIT BEACH
59684 09-Sep-99 BIFFS INC.133.52 PORTABLE - HACKBERRY
59684 09-Sep-99 BIFFS INC.66.76 PORTABLE - HACKBERRY
Totals Check Number 59684 BIFFS INC.467.32
Check Number 59685 BLACKOWIAK & SON
59685 lO-Sep-99 BLACKOWIAK a SON 157.80 WAST SERVICE - BEDERWOOD
59685 lO-Sep-99 BLACKOWIAK a SON 72.33 WASTE SERVICE - GC
59685 lO-Sep-99 BLACKOWIAK a SON 157.80 WASTE SERVICE - LAKE
59685 lO-Sep-99 BLACKOWIAK a SON 191.72 WASTE SERVICE - CH
Totals Check Number 59685 BLACKOWIAK a SON 579.65
Check Number 59686 BLUE LINE LEARNING GROUP
59686 08-Sep-99 BLUE LINE LEARNING GROUP 100.00 BLOBORNB PATH - CD RON
Totals Check Number 59686 BLUE LINE LEARNING GROUP 100.00
Check Number 59688 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.24,709.80 WTR PLANT REHAB-NAVARRE
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.100.00 JUNE COUNCIL MINUTES
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.269.00 DICKEY PARK-PARKING LOT
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC.64.50 DRAINAGE-N ARM DR/SUMMIT
i
10 Sep 1999 Check Register Page 3
Fri 1:50 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
Date
59688 BONESTROO
Name
ROSENE k ASSOC.
City of Orono
Transaction
Amount Comments
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.104.00 ORONO BASE MAP UPDATE
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.170.20 MISC EXPENSE JUNE
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.322.50 FOX RIDGE FEASIBILITY R?T
59608 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.694.25 GOLF CLUBHOUSE DECK
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,534.25 PLAT REVEWS
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.2,225.51 NAV WTR REHAB 6/99
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.6,547.31 EDGEWOOD KILLS SWR 6/99
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,212.12 HERITAGE DR SWR 6/99
59608 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.4,877.64 ORONO ORCHARD SWR 6/99
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.137.28 WEBBER HILLS SWR 6/99
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.69.81 LS 813 REHAB 6/99
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.676.00 I/I CASCO FERNDALE AREA
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.552.52 I/I NAVARRE AREA
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.172.05 HEAD SEWER 6/99
59688 lO-Sep-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.261.60 TH12/STUBBS BY RD CLOSURE
Totals Check Number 59688 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.44,700.34
Check Number 59689 BOTTENBERG, WENDY
59689 09-Sep-99 BOTTENBERG. WENDY
Totals Check Number 59609 BOTTENBERG, WENDY
Check Number 59690 BUDGET PRINTING
59690
59690
59690
08- Sep-99
09- Sep-99
09-Sep-99
BUDGET PRINTING
BUDGET PRINTING
BUDGET PRINTING
Totals Check Number 59690 budget printing
Check Number 59691 BUG BUSTERS« INC
59691 08-Sep-99 BUG BUSTERS, INC
Totals Check Number 59691 BUG BUSTERS, INC
Check Number 59692 BURTON EQUIPMENT
59692 08-Sep-99 BURTON EQUIPMENT
Totals Check Number 59692 BURTON EQUIPMENT
Check Number 59693 CHILDREN FAMILIES k LEARNING
59693 CHILDREN FAMILIES 6 LEARNING08-Sep-99
Totals Check Number 59693 CHILDREN FAMILIES & LEARNING
54.83
54.83
21.64
6.09
763.27
791.00
139.00
639.00
354.85
354.85
25.00
25.00
MILEAGE, PARKING
PARKING FLYERS
SHIPPING CHARGES
FLYERS - CONSOLIDATION
BAT EXCLUSION-CLUB HOUSE
CABINET-NVR WTR PLNT
CFSP TRNING-SCHOENHOFF
• 'i- '!•
10 Sep 1999
Fri 1.50 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number 59693 CHILDREN FAMILIES & ^EARNING
Check Number 59695 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
59695
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep>99
09-Sep-99
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
CHUNKS
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKFSHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
LAKESHORE
AUTO
AUTO
AUTO
AUl'O
AUTO
AUTO
AUTO
AUTO
AUTO
AUTO
AUTO
AUTO
AUTO
AUTO
AUTO
AUTO
AUTO
Totals Check Number 59695 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO
Check Number 59696 CITYVIEW PLUMBING & HEATING
59696
59696
O0-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
CITYVIEW PLUMBING & HEATING
CITYVIEW PLUMBING & HEATING
Totals Check Number 59696 CITYVIEW PLUMBING & HEATING
Check Number 59697 COFFEE MILL
59697
59697
59697
08- Sep<99
09- Sep-99
09-Sep-99
COFFEE MILL
COFFEE MILL
:E MILL
Totals Check Number 59697 COFFEE MILL
Check Number 59698 CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA GRP
59698 09-Sep-99 CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA GRP
Totals ChecK. Number 59698 CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA GRP
Check Number 59699 CROWIHER, DOUG
59699 08-Sep-99
Totals Check N-.aODer
CROWTHER, DOUG
59699 CROWTHER, DOUG
Transaction
Amount
346.84
127.00
156.00
131.00
414.00
171.10
171.10
71.87
91.87
Page 4
Comments
47.05 OIL CHG, LUBE 8181
32.21 OIL CHG, LUBE #185
24.95 MNT k BALANCE TIRES #184
230.78 OIL CHG, TURNSIGNAL #182
192.31 TURNSIGNAL SWTCH #179
75.49 RPLACE SIREN SPKR #185
97.14 OIL CHG, PWR SUPPLY #184
448.22 BALL JOINTS, U JOINT #186
39.38 CK COOLING SYS PRES #178
100.66 CK WIG WAGS #177
32.21 OIL CHNG #183
42.75 MNT & BALANCE TIRES #185
18.75 REPLACE BULB #184
45.12 MNT TIRE, RPL HDLGHT #150
70.88 OIL CHNG RPL BULB #180
245.29 SIREN, LGHT BAR #186
32.21 OIL CHNG #185
1,775.40
338.41 REPAIR URINAL
8.43 PVC COUPLING
COFFEE
COFFEE, SUGAR, CREAM
COF'J'EE, CREAM
ADV FOR BIDS-HEAD SWR
REIMBBURSB TOW CHARGES
10 Sep 1999
Fri 1:S0 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 5
Check
Number
Check Number
Check Number
Date Name
59699 CROWTHER, DOUG
59700 CUMMINS ALLISON
Transaction
Amount Comments
59700 08-Sep-99 CUMMINS ALLISON 126.47 BAGS FOR SHREDDER
Totals Check Number 59700 CUMMINS ALLISON 126.47
Check Number 59701 CYS UNIFORMS
59701 09-Sep-99 CYS UNIFORMS 339.45 UNIFORMS - TOMCHECK
59701 09-Sep-99 CYS UNIFORMS 148.9C UNIFORM - J JOHNSON
59701 09-Sep-99 CYS UNIFORMS 210.80 BELT, SHCZS, PANT-MCNICHOLS
59701 09-Sep-99 CYS UNIFORMS 300.56 UNIFORMS - TOMCHECK
Totals Check Number 59701 CYS UNIFORMS 999.71
Check Number 59702 DAY'S INN
59702 08-Sep-99 DAY'S INN 93.93 LODGING-MALEFI CONFERENCE
Totals Check Number 59702 DAY'S INN 93.93
Check Number 59703 DCA
597C3 08-Sep-99 DCA 159.60 ACCT ADMIN 8/99
59703 09-Sep-?9 DCA 78.50 COBRA ATMIN FEE 7/99
Totals Check Number 59703 DCA 238.10
Check Number 59704 DCA - WIRE ONLY
59704 09-Sep-99 DCA - WIRE ONLY 1,056.54 FLEX SPEIt-DING WIRE-8/24
597C4 09-Sep*99 DCA - WIRE ONLY 262.60 FLEX SP2JDING 9/13/99
Totals Check Number 59704 DCA - WIRE ONLY 1,319.14
Check Number S9705 OB BAERS. DON
59705 08-Sep-99 DE BA£R£« DON 30.00 MILEAGE-SVR SCHOOL
Totals Check Number 59705 DB BAERE, DON 30.00
Check Number 59706 DICKS AUTO DETAILING
59706 08-Sep-99 DICKS AUTO DETAILING 79.50 CLEAN I.NTZRIER 8186
A
Totals Check Hunybar 59706 DICKS AUTO DETAILING 79.50
10 Sep 1999
Fri 1:50 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
59707
59707 E-2 RECYCLING
09-Sep-99 E-Z RECYCLING
Totals Check Number 59707 E-Z RECYCLING
Check Number 59708 EARL P. ANDERSON k ASSOC.
59700
59708
08- Sep-99
09- Sep-99
EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC
EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC
Totals Check Number 59708 EARL P. ANDERSON k ASSOC
Check Number 59709 ELECTRIC PUMP
59709 08-Sep-99 ELECTRIC PUMP
Totals Check Number 59709 ELECTRIC PUMP
Check Number 59710 ELMER J. PETERSON CO.
59710 09-Sep-99 ELMER J. PETERSON CO.
Totalu Check Number 59710 ELMER J. PETERSON CO.
Check Number 59711 ENCHANTED GARDEN FLORAL
59711 09-Sep-99 ENCHANTED GARDEN FLORAL
Totals Check Number 59711 ENC:UNTED GARDEN FLORAL
Check Number 59712 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS
59712 O0-Sep-99 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS
Totals Check Number 59712 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS
Check Number 59713 EXPRESS MESSENGER
59713
59713
59713
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
EXPRESS MESSENGER
EXPRESS ^ffiSSENGER
EXPRESS MESSENGER
Totals Check Number 59713 EXPRESS MESSENGER
Check Number 59714 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY
59714 09-Sep-99 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY
Transaction
Amount
5,697.72
5,697.72
1,667.79
161.10
1,828.89
6,948.82
6,948.82
1,530.00
1,530.00
53.25
53.25
20.35
20.35
137.20
39.30
13.65
190.15
750.00
Page 6
Comments
RECYCLING - AUGUST 1999
POSTS
SIGNS
ANNUAL SWR PUMP INSP
PUMPED LS - SWR HOOK UP
FLOWERS - BENSEN
SCAN TO PLOT/2056 SHORLNE
DELIVERY TO N CHADWICK
DEL TO LMCIT
DEL TO HINSHAW
FISCAL AGENT FEE-HRA REF
4[
*
Totals Check Number 59714 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY
Check Number 59715 FORTIS BENEFITS
59715 08-Sep-99 FORTIS BENEFITS
Totals Check Number 59715 FORTIS BENEFITS
Check Number 59716 G & K SERVICES
59716
59716
59716
59716
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
G & K SERVICES
G & R SERVICES
G li K SERVICES
G & K SERVICES
Totals Check Number 59716 G A R SERVICES
Check Number 59717 GALL'S INC.
59717 09-Sep-99 GALL'S'iNC.
Totals Check Number 59717 GALL'S INC.
Check Number 59718 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
59718 09-Sep-99 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
Totals Check Humber 59718 GLENWOOD Inglewood
Check Number 59719 GOLF CAR MIDWEST
59719 03-Sep-99 GOLF CAR MIDWEST
Totals Check Number 59719 GOLF CAR MIDWEST
Check Number 59720 GRAFIX SHOPPE
59720
59720
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
GRAFIX SHOPPE
GRAFIX SHOPPE
Totals Check Number 59720 GRAFIX SHOPPE
2^230.14
744.73
744.73
8.52
76.39
32.06
14.02
130.99
107.98
107.98
62.26
62.26
1,400.00
1,400.00
313.00
26.30
339.30
10 Sep 1999 Check Register
Fri 1:50 PM City of Or-
Check Transaction
Number Date Name Amount Comments
Check Number 59714 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY
59714 09-Sep-99 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY 1,068.38 FISCAL AGENT FEB
59714 09-Sep-99 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY 218.38 FISCAL AGENT FEB
59714 09-Sep-99 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY 36.43 FISCAL AGENT FEE
59714 09-Sep-99 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY 79.40 FISCAL AGENT FEE
59714 09-Sep-99 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY 77.55 FISCAL AGENT FEB
Page 7
SEPTEMBER LTD PREMIUMS
UNIFORM-STEFFENHAGEN
UNIFORMS
SHOP TOWELS
UNIFORM - RATHBUN
SPEAKER 8186
WATER
AUG 99 GOLF LEASE
GRAPHICS #186
PLATES #186
' I
10 Sep 1999
Fri 1:50 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 8
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
59721
59721
59721 HANKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
09-Sep-99 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
09-Sep-99 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
Totals Check Number 59721 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
Check Number 59722 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN
59722 08-Sep-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN
Totals Check Number 59722 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN
Check Number 59724 HUBCAP WAREHOUSE
59724 08-Sep-99 HUBCAP WAREHOUSE
Totals Check Number 59724 HUBCAP WAREHOUSE
Check Number 59725 ICMA PRODUCT FULFILLMENT CTR
59725 09-Sep-99 ICMA PRODUCT FULFILLMENT CTR
Totals Check Number 59725 IQU PRODUCT FULFILLMENT CTR
Check Number 59726 INFRATECH
59726 08-Sep-99 INFRATECH
Totals Check Number 59726 INFRATECH
Check Number
59727
59727 INTERSTATE BATTERIES
09-Sep-99 INTERSTATE BATTERIES
Transaction
Amoui't
527.18
1,331.25
1,858.43
1,043.75
1,043.75
63.90
63.90
41.00
41.00
1,080.60
1,080.60
67.04
Comments
FLOURIDE PUMP-NAV WTR
CHLORINE PUMP k LINE NVR
RM AND BRD - 7/99
Check Number 59723 HINSHAW 6 CULBERTSON
59723 lO-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 3,185.00 LEGAL APPLIC JUNE
59723 lO-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 70.00 GORDON NELSON MATTER
59723 lO-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 70.00 THOMTON MATTER
59723 lO-Sep-99 HINSHAW CULBERTSON 1,100.00 LEGAL SERVICE JUNE
59723 lO-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 190.76 EDGEWOOD HILLS SWR
59723 lO-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1,408.00 WOODHILL CC-ROAD MATTER
59723 lO-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1,208.00 SAGA HILL LAND ACQ
59723 10-i»ep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 143.00 HOYT RETAINING WALL
59723 lO-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 73.00 ORONO ORCHARD EASEMENT
59723 10-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 319.00 SLAUGHTER-CARRIAGE RD
59723 lO-Sep-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 88.00 GENERAL LAND USE REVIEW
Totals Check Numler 59723 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 7,854.76
HUBCAPS
SEL A POLICE CHF HANDBOOK
GROUTING OF GS 84
BATTERY - BCiZ TRUCK
10 Sep 1999
Pri 1:50 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 9
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number 59727 INTERSTATE BATTERIES
Totals Check Number 59727 INTERSTATE BATTERIES
Check Number 59728 J-CRAFT INC.
Check Number
59735
59735 LHCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN
09-Sep-99 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN
Transaction
Amount Comments
€7.04
59728 09-Sep-99 J-CRAFT INC.22,382.91 DUMP BOX, BLADE 99 TRUCK
Totals Check Number 59728 J-CRAFT INC.22,382.91
Check Number 59729 JOHN BABLER AUTOBODY
59729 09-Sep-99 JOHN BABLER AUTOBODY 112.00 REFINISH REAR BUMPER 8179
59729 09-Sep-99 JOHN BABLER AUTOBODY 910.00 PAINT 8186
59729 09-Sep-99 JOHN BABLER AUTOBODY 278.82 KEPLAICE TAILGATE 8186
Totals Check Number 59729 JOHN BABLER AUTOBODY 1,320 82
Check Number 59730 KATH FUEL OIL
59730 09-Sep-99 KATH FUEL OIL 19.79 15W 40 OIL
Totals Check Number 59730 KATH FUEL OIL 19.79
Check Number 59731 KENNETH N . POTTS, PA
59731 09-Sep-99 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA 2,291.66 PROSECUTIONS 8/99
Totals Check Number 59731 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA 2,291.66
Check Nund^er 55T32 KEVIN DULIN
59732 09-SCP-99 KEVIN DULIN 85.55 REIM TOWING CHARGES
Totals Check Number 59732 KEVIN DULIN 85.55
Check Number 59733 KOEHNEN'S AMOCO
59733 09-Sep-99 KOEHNQI'S AMOCO 15.90 HALOGEN BULB
Totals Check Number 59733 KOEHNEN'S AMOCO 15.90
Check Number 59734 LMCIT
59734 09-Sep-99 LMCIT 1,000.00 BROOK PARK REALTY DEFENSE
Totals Check Number 59734 LMCIT 1,000.00
18,851.75 COMP MUNIC COVERAGE PAY 4
• 1
r
■4
10 Sep 1^99
Frt 1:50 PM
Check Register
City of Orcno
Page 10
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number 59735 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN
Totals Check Number 59735 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN
Check Number 59736 LCX3IS
59736
59736
59736
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
u9-Sep-99
LOQIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
Totals Check Number 59736 LOGIS
Check Number 59737 LONG LAKE GLASS INC.
59737 09-Sep-99 LONG LAKE GLASS INC
Totals Check Number 59737 LONG LAKE GLASS INC
Check Number 59738 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
59738
59738
59738
59738
59738
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-'*9
09-Sep-i9
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
Totals Check Number 59738 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
Check Number 59739 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT
59739 09-Sep-99 LONG LAKE Tl TOR EQUIPMENT
Totals Check Number 59739 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT
Check Number 59742 MEDICA CHOICE
59742
59742
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
MEDICA CHOICE
MEDICA CHOICE
Transaction
Amount
18,851.75
958.38
958.38
958 41
2,875.17
105.45
105.45
50.29
38.02
4.97
10.61
31.86
135.75
76.07
76.07
178.55
357.11
Comments
PIMS APPLIC MAY
PIMS APPLIC JUNE
PIMS APPLIC JULY
SWEEPER WINDOW
LAMINATION
OIL TANK
SPARK PLUG, MISC
REPAIR KIT
CHAIN
PART FOR 427
Check NUif^er 59740 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI k CO
59740 lO-Sep-99 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI k CO 2,500.00 AUDIT PYMNT »4 - F
59740 lO-Sep-99 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI k CO 545.00 AUDIT EXPENSE
59740 lO-Sep-99 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI k CO 520.00 BOND STATEMENT EXP
59740 lO-Sep-99 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI k CO 93.00 AUDIT EXPENSE
Totals Check Number 59740 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI k CO 3,655.00
HEALTH INS 9/99
HEALTH INS 9/99
10 Sep 1999 Check Register
Totals Check Number 59744 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER
Check Number S9745 MIDWEST ASPIUkLT
59745 09-Sep-99 MIDWEST ASPHALT
Totals Check Number 59745 MIDWEST ASPHALT
Check Number 59746 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
59746 09-SCP-9? MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
Totals Check Nvimber '9746 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
Check Number 59747 MINNCOMM
59747
59747
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
MINNCOMM
MINNCOMM
Totals Check Number 59747 MINNCOMM
Check Number 5974B MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
59748 09-Sep-99 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
1,039.50
1,386.23
1,386.23
627.15
627.15
3.96
3.96
7.92
13.50
rage 11
Frl liSO PM City of Orono
Check Transaction
Number Date Name Amount Comments
Check Number 59742 MEDICA CHOICE
59742 09-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 603.52 HEALTH INS 9/5?
59742 09-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 357.11 HEALTH INS 9/55
59742 09-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 357.11 HEALTH INS 9/r?
59742 09-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 3,035.42 HEALTH INS 9/5?
59,42 09-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 747.45 HEALTH INS 9/55
59742 73-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 178.55 HEALTH INS 9/5;
59742 09-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 1,249.86 HEALTH INS 9/5?
59742 09-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 178.56 HEALTH INS 9/55
59742 09-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 178.55 HEALTH INS 9/5?
59742 09-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 1,965.05 HEALTH INS 9/5?
59742 09-Sep-99 MEDICA CHOICE 6,813.24 HEALTH INS 9/5?
Totals Check Number 59742 MEDICA CHOICE 16,200.08
Check i.'umber 59743 MEDTOX LABORATORIES
59743 09-Sep-99 MEDTOX Lu-ORATORIES 106.00 DRUG TESTING
Totals Check Number 59743 MEDTOX LABORATORIES 106.00
Check Number 59744 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER
59744 08-Sep-99 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER 1,050.00 JULY 1999 15AC CHARGES
59744 08-Sep-99 fffiT COUNCIL EN'/IRCNMENTAL SER -10.50 JULY 1999 SAC CHARGES
HAND PATCH
SODA FOR RESAIZ
FED TXS - PAGi?-S
FED TXS - PAGIaS
OXYGEN
10 Sep 1999
Pri 1:50 PM
Check
Number
Check Number
Check Register
City of Orono
Date Name
59748 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
Totals Check Number 59740 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
Check Number
59749
59749
59749
59749
59749
59749 MINNEGASCO
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
Totals Check Number 59749 MINNEGASCO
Check Number 59750 DEPT OF HEALTH
Check Number 59752 MORONCZYNSKI, JIM
59752 08-Sep-99 MOROWCZYNSKI, JIM
Totals Check Number 59752 >OROWCZYNSKI« JIM
Check Number 59753 MPLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
59753
59753
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
MPLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
MPLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Totals Check Number 59753 MPLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Check Number 59754 MPWA
59754 08-Sep-99 MPWA
Totals Check Number 59754 MPWA
Transaction
Amount
13.50
17.00
17.00
60.00
60.00
120.00
40.00
40.00
Page 12
Comments
90.38 GAS SERVICE
11.08 GAS SERVICE
28.67 GAS SERVICE
35.04 GAS SERVICE
69.71 GAS SERVICE
234.88
59750 09-Sep-99 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 1,086.00 WATER TEST FEE
Totals Check Number 59750 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 1,086.00
Check Number 59751 MOORSE, RON
59753 09-SCP-99 MOORSE,RON 31.00 MISC MEETINGS
59751 09-Sep-99 MOORSE,RON 19.50 PARKING EXPENSES
59751 09-Sep-99 MOORSE,RON 80.36 WORK SESSIONS
59751 09-Sep-99 MOORSE«RON 51.19 WELCOMING RECEPTIONS
59751 09-Sep-99 MOORSB,RON 6.50 CONSOLIDATION COM
59751 09-Sep-99 MOORSE«RON 19.55 HIGHWAY 12
Totals Check Number 59751 MOORSE«RON 208.10
MILEAGE/MEALS-EM MGT TRN
DATA PRIV UPDATE-MADSON
DATA PRIV UPDATE-BOBZIEN
RDWY MAINT 21ST CENTURY
10 Sep 1999
Fri is50 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
59755
59755
59755 MTI DIST CO.
O0-Sep-99 MTI DIST CO
09-Sep-99 MTI DIST CO
Totals Check Number 59755 mti dist co.
Check Number 59756 NAVARRE AMOCO
59756 09-Sep-99 NAVARRE AMOCO
Totals Check Number 59756 NAVARRE AMOCO
Check Number 59757 NAVARRE HARDWARE
59757 09>Sep*99 NAVARRE HARDWARE
Totals Check Number 59757 NAVARRE HARDWARE
Check Number 59758 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS
59758 08-Sep-99 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS
Totals Check Number 59758 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS
Check Number 59759 NORTH STAR TURF
59759
59759
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
NORTH STAR TURF
NORTH STAR TURF
Totals Check Number 59759 NORTH STAR TURF
Check Number 59760 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP
59760 09-Sep-99 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP
Totals Check Number 59760 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP
Check Number 59761 NSP
Transaction
Amount
22,960.34
69.91
23,030.25
7.00
7.00
29.79
29.79
108.00
108.00
23.77
205.08
228.85
191 ^6
191.96
Page 13
Comments
REELMASTER FAIRWAY MOWER
BLADE
TIRE REPAIR
BRUSH, STAIN
PERA LIFE 9/99
BELT
ROLLER FOR GREENSMOffER
BEE SPRAY, DEODERIZER
59761 08-Sep-99 NSP 1,204.71 STREET LIGHTING 8/99
59761 09-Sep-99 NSP 1,542.02 ELECTRICAL SERVICE
59761 09-Sep-99 NSP 664.09 ELECTRICAL SERVICE
59761 09-SCP-99 NSP 9.42 ELECTRICAL SERVICE
59761 09-Sep-99 NSP 268.38 ELECTRICAL SERVICE
59761 09-Sep-99 NSP 23.28 ELECTRICAL SERVICE
59761 09-Sep-99 NSP 3,768.94 ELECTRICAL SERVICE
59761 09-Sep-99 NSP 1,335.00 ELECTRICAL SERVICE
I
10 Sep 1999
rrl 1:S0 PM
Check
Nunber Date Name
Check Register
City zt Orono
Transaction
Amount
Page 14
Comments
Check Number
59761
59761
59761 NSP
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
NSP
NSP
59761 NSP
778.93
138.52
9.733.29
ELECTRICAL SERVICE
HWY 12 SIGNAL LITES
Check Number
597S2
51r762 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT
08-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
OBERAIGNER, SCOTT
59762 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT
Check Number
59763
59763 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.
08-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
OLD DUTCH FOODS INC
59763 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC,
Check Number
59764
59764 OLD REPUBLIC
09-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
OLD REPUBLIC
59764 OLD REPUBLIC
Check Number
59765
59765
59765 OMAN, LYLE
09-Scp-99
09-Sep-99
OMAN, LYLE
OMAN, LYLE
Totals Check Number 59765 OMAN, LYLE
Check Nunber
59766
59766 PAUL LARSON
09-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
PAUL LARSON
59766 PAUL LARSON
Check Number
59767
59767
59767
59767 PERRY'S SANDBLASTING
08-Sep*99
08-Sep-99
08-Sep-99
Totals Check Number
PERRY'S SANDBLASTING
PERRY'S SANDBLASTING
PERRY'S SANDBLASTING
59767 PERRY'S SANDBLASTING
Check Number
59768
59768 PIONEER
09-Sep-99 PIONEER
30.00
30.00
14.28
14.28
635.00
635.00
31.35
23.76
55.11
1,000.00
1,000.00
471.13
1.970.27
670.00
3,111.40
53.92
MILEAGC'SEWER SCHOOL
CHIPS FOR RESALE
EASEMENT-FAIRVIEW CHRCH
MILEAGE REIMBURSMENT
MILEAGE REIMBURSMENT
EARNEST MONEY-3790 SHRELN
RST REM k PAINT 8422
RST REM k PAINT 8710
RST REM k PAINT 8431
ADV FOR BIDS-STBS BAY ACC
►
10 Sep 1999
Fri 1:50 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
59760
59768 PIONEER
09-Sep-99 PIONEER
Totals Check Number 59768 PIONEER
Check Number 59769 PORTLAND MARIOTT
59769 09-Sep-99 PORTLAND MARIOTT
Totals Check Number 59769 PORTLAND MARIOTT
Check Number 59770 RC IDENTIFICATIONS
59770 08-Sep-99 RC IDENTIFICATIONS
Totals Check Number 59770 RC IDENTIFICATIONS
Check Number 59771 REED VENDING
59771
59771
59771
59771
O0-Sep-99
O0-Sep-99
08- Sep-99
09- Sep-99
REED VENDING
REED VENDING
REED VENDING
REED VENDING
Totals Check Number 59771 REED VENDING
Check Number 59772 RICKS SUPERVALUE
59772
59772
lO-Sep-99
lO-Sep-99
RICKS SUPERVALUE
RICKS SUPERVALUE
Totals Check Number 59772 RICKS SUPERVALUE
Check Number 59773 RITZ CAMERA
59773 09-Sep-99 RITZ CAMERA
Totals Check Number 59773 RITZ CAMERA
Check Number 59774 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
59774 09-Sep-99 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
Totals Check Number 59774 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
Check Number 59775 SNYDER DRUG STORES
59775 09-Sep-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES
Transaction
Amount
46.73
100.65
693.24
693.24
6.39
6.39
48.50
48.50
74.50
77.00
249.30
12.59
115.32
127.91
12.45
11.45
3,507.00
3,507.00
4.21
Page 15
Comments
ADV FOR BIDS-HEAD SWR
LODGING-ICMA CONF-MOORSB
ID CARDS, PENCE, DAVIS
CANDY FOR RESALE
CONCESSIONS FOR RESALE
CONCESSIONS FOR RESALE
SNACKS FOR RESALE
BAKERY, OJ - EMER MGMT MT
MEAT FOR EMPLOYEE PICNIC
1 HOUR PROCESSING
3RD QTR 99 CONTRIBUTION
GREETING CARD
r
10 Sep 1999
Pri 1:50 PH
Check Register
City of Orono
Check
Number Date Name
Check Number
59775
59775
59775
59775
59775 SNYDER DRUG STORES
09-Sep-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES
09-Sep-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES
09-Sep-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES
09-Sep-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES
Totals Check Number 59775 SNYDER DRUG STORES
Check Number 59776 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
59776 08-Sep-99 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
Totals Check Number 59776 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
Check Number 59777 STAT-MEDICAL
59777 09-Sep-99 STAT-MEDICAL
Totals Check Hunger 59777 STAT-MEDICAL
Check Number 59770 STATE TREASURER
59778
59778
08- Sep-99
09- Sep-99
STATE TREASURER
STATE TREASURER
Totals Check Number 59770 STATE TREASURER
Check Number 59779 TEMACA LAWN SPRINKLERS, INC
» ly 09-Sep-99 TEMACA LAWN SPRINKLERS, INC
Totals Check Number 59779 TEMACA LAWN SPRINKLERS, ^NC
Check Number 59700 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO
59780
59780
59780
59780
08-Sep-99
08- Sep-99
09- Sep-99
09-Sep-99
TEMPORARIES-TO-GO
TEMPORARIES-TO-GO
TEMPORARIES-TO-GO
TEMPORARIES-TO-GO
Totals Check Number 59780 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO
Check Number 59781 THE HOUSE DOCTOR
59781 09-Sep-99 THE HOUSE DOCTOR
Totals Check Number 59781 THE HOUSE DOCTOR
Check Number 59782 THE SIGN AGE
Transaction
Amount
12.77
16.10
4.68
2.39
40.15
30.71
38.71
24.54
24.54
30.00
30.00
60.00
222.92
222.92
533.25
540.00
68.75
351.00
1,493.00
75.00
75.00
Page 16
Comments
LITH BATTERY
PHOTO PROC, IBUPROFEN
BATTERYS
PHOTO PROCESSING
UNLEADED GASOLINE
TOWELETTES
99 FALL CODE SEM-DAVIS
FALL CODE SEM - OMAN
REPAIRS TO SPRINK SYST
TEMP HELP WK 8/29/99
TEMP HELP-WK OP 8/22/99
TEMP HELP-EMP PICNIC
TEMP HELP-WK END 9/5/99
UNPLUG FAUCETS-MAIN BRK
i
10 Sep 1999
Fri 1:50 PM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 17
Check
Humber Date Name
Check Number
59782
59782 THE SIGN AGE
09-Sep-99 THE SIGN AGE
Totals Check Number 59782 THE SIGN AGE
Check Number 59703 THORPE DIST CO.
59783 09-Sep-99 THORPE DIST CO.
Totals Check Number 59703 THORPE DIST CO.
Check Number 59704 TONKA SIGNCRAFTERS
59784 09-Sep-99 TONKA SIGNCRAFTERS
Totals Check Number 59784 TONKA SIGNCRAFTERS
Check Number 59785 TRACY TRIPP FUELS
59785 08-Sep-99 TRACY TRIPP FUELS
Totals Check Number 59785 TRACY TRIPP FUELS
Check Number 59786 TRUXSTOR
59786 09-Sep-99 TRUXSTOR
Totals Check Number 59786 TRUXSTOR
Check Number 59787 united states postal service
59787 09-Sep-99 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Totals Check Number 59787 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Check Number 59789 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE
Transaction
Amount
21.30
21.30
109.35
109.35
308.85
308.85
3,423.52
3,423.52
335.00
335.00
1,800.00
1,800.00
Comments
DECAL FOR LS
BEER FOR RESALE
SIGN-SEVEN NATIONS PARK
3200 GALLONS UNLEADED
TOPPER FOR 186
POSTAGE FOR METER
59789 lO-Sep-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 5.60 9/99 LIFE PREMIUT!
59789 lO-Sep-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 4.20 9/99 LIFE PREMIOH
59789 lO-Scp-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 23.80 9/99 LIFE PREMIUM
59789 lO-Sep-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 5.60 9/99 LIFE PREMIUM
59789 lO-Sep-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 1.40 9/99 LIFE PREMIUM
59789 lO-Sep-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 11.20 9/99 LIFE PREMIUM
59789 lO-Sep-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 2.80 9/99 LIFE PREMIUM
59789 lO-Sep-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 1.40 9/99 LIFE PREMIUM
59789 lO-Sep-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 21.75 9/99 LITE PREMIUM
59789 lO-Sep-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 343.55 9/99 LIFE PREMIUM
Check Register
City of Orono
Page 18 »age 19
Date Name
59709 UNUM
lO-Sep-99
lO-Sep-99
lO-Sep-99
lO-Sep-99
lO-Sep-99
lO-Sep-99
lO-Sep-99
lO-Sep-99
lO-Sep-99
lO-Sep-99
LIFE INSURANCE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
UNUM LIFE
Uii^UM LIFE
- LIFE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
LIFE
•ck Number 59709 UNTJM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE
59790 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-SCP-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
09-Sep-99
US WEST
US WEST
US WEST
US WEST
US WEST
US WEST
US WEST
US WEST
US WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
eck Number
eck Number
leck Number
59790 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
59791 VINCENT E. JOHNSON, P.A.
09-Sep-99 VINCENT E. JOHNSON, P.A.
59791 VINCENT E. JOHNSON, P.A.
59792 W.W. GRAINGER INC.
08-Sep-99 W.W. GRAINGER INC.
59792 W.W. GRAINGER INC.
59793 WARNING LITES OF MN
I O0-Sep-99 WARNING LITES OF MN
leck Number 59793 warning LITES of MN
r 5979i WEILAND, JOHN k CAROL
4 O0-Sep-99 WEILAND, JOHN k CAROL
Transaction
Amount
500.00
500.00
96.06
96.06
100.95
108.95
100.00
Comments
1.20 9/99 AD&D PREMIUM
0.90 9/99 AD&D PREMIUM
5.10 9/99 AD&D PREMIUM
1.20 9/99 AD&D PREMIUM
0.30 9/99 AD&D PREMIUM
2.40 9/99 AD&D PREMIUM
0.60 9/99 ADaiD PREMIUM
0.30 9/99 AD&D PREMIUM
9.75 9/99 AD&D PREMIUM
70.45 9/99 AD&D PREMIUM
521.50
54.05 PHONE SERVICE
45.06 PHONE SERVICE
906.23 PHONE SERVICE
30.21 PHONE SERVICE
70.48 PHONE SERVICE
65.03 PHONE SERVICE
202.30 DIR ADV
77.12 PHONE SERVICE
45.94 PHONE SERVICE
1,496.42
EASEMENT-FAIRVIEW CHRCH
'99
1/99
MIDGET FUSES
BARRICADES
PARTIAL REF APPL 2507
BMn.rfi.ij
Af\\ •'
3
TO;
FROM:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Ron Moorse, City Admimstrator
September 9,1999
m ^^'3,999
•a‘
SUBJECT: WSI to Move Its Operations Out of Orono
It was recently published that WSI^ one of the City's largest employers, will be moving its operations
out of the City. WSI will consolidate its operations at an existing facility in anoUier city.
Apparently, the Orono facility is substantially larger than is necessary for the operations currently
housed in the facility.
The C'ty has already begim to receive inquiries regarding new industrial uses on the site.
IPMK
Oh LaKe AAlmetOHkfl
Mayor
Jerome R Rockvam
471-9515
Counciimembers
Wm. D. Weeks
471-7285
Richard Diea
471-7799
Joanna tWidmer
471-9429
Thomas J. Scanlon
471-7563
September 2,1999
City of Orono Police Departmeut
P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55323
Re: Big Island
Dear Chief Cheswick,
The Spring Park City Council wished to express gratitude and
their appreciation in your efforts to maintain a high quality of
pride in our community.
There is concern for the health, safety, and welfare of the
community when illegal activities on Big Island continue to
exist. The City Council supports your department, the
Hennepin County Sheriffs Water Patrol, and the Minnesota
DNR.
The City Council also supports your appeal to the LMCD for
more control of events to be held.
Sincerely,
Patricia Higus,
Adnunistrator/Clerk/Treasurer
cc: Water Patrol
DNR
NG
^ J
Ciry
/Si ^
CiU/ Of Sp.'iHj
P.O.BOX 452.SPRING PARK.MINNESOTA 55384-0452 • Phone:471-9051 • Fax:471-9160
REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1
DATE OF RUN 06/03/99
YEAR-TO-DATE
***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT
CITY OP ORONO
-- CURRENT RANGE -
01/01/99 - 07/31/99
MiETINQ
SEP 1 3 1999 PAGE: 1
REQUESTER: CAROLE
-- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
01/01/98 - 07/31/98
PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEB VALUATION PLAN REVIEW
Building
SGL FAMILY-NEW 21 60,279.20 10,489,661.55 39,181.45 19 49,515.25 8,915,976.00 32,184.87
DUPLEX-NEW 1 1,637.25 250,000.00 1,064.21 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
SF-ADD/REMODEL 174 49,620.75 4,545,152.24 22,445.45 218 51,165.75 4,501,230.25 21,775.83
SF-ACC STRUCTURE 24 3,681.25 223,410.00 2,242.67 23 7,088.75 724,680.00 4,526.45
DEMO/PRINCIPAL 13 830.00 0.00 0.00 11 580.00 0.00 0.00
COMMERCIAL-NEW 1 3,099.75 550,000.00 2,014.84 1 6,365.25 1,492,000.00 4,137.41
COM-ADD/REMODEL 6 1,763.00 131,375.00 810.23 5 1,784.00 191,875.00 941.36
COM-ACC STRUCTUR 0 0.00 0.00 •0.00 5 1,462.25 110,000.00 105.46
INST-ADD/RBMODEL 2 963.50 88,000.00 0.00 2 902.25 122,480.00 0.00
DEMO-ACCESSORY 4 120.00 0.00 0.00 4 120.00 0.00 0.00
ACC/GARAGES 3 1,007.50 84,425.00 654.88 14 3,252.50 228,782.00 2,094.63
Sub-total 249*123,002.20*16,362,023.79*68,413.73*302*122,236.00*16,287,023.25*65,766.01*
Mechanical
HEATING SYSTEMS 72 8,920.98 699,005.90 0.00 55 8,143.19 642,798.44 O.Ou
AIR CONDITIONING 12 474.13 30,235.50 0.00 13 696.82 51,263.52 0.00
WOOD STOVE/FLUE 2 72,50 4,200.00 0.00 2 70.00 3,000.00 0.00
FIREPLACE 38 1,724.39 100,983.85 0.00 46 2,012.69 117,023.00 0.00
VENTILATION 7 302.50 14,440.00 0.00 5 175.00 7,400.00 0.00
FUEL STORAGE 1 312.50 25,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
GAS LINE INSPECT 11 425.00 13,400.00 0.00 5 175.00 5,659.00 0.00
DUCT WORK ONLY 4 198.75 10,000.00 0.00 12 433.75 18,983.00 0.00
REMOVE OIL TANK 5 2,567.55 200,583.79 0.00 6 210.00 3,738.75 0.00
Sub-total 152*14,998.30*1,097,849.04*0.00*144*11,916.45*849,865.71*0.00*
Plumbing
FIXTURES 97 8,835.47 610,292.00 0.00 111 9,257.41 642,516.38 0.00
SPRINKLER 1 93.75 7,500.00 , 0.00 1 82.75 6,620.00 0.00
WATER METER 6 1,160.00 0.00 0.00 6 1,426.00 0.00 0.00
VACUUM BREAKER 1 35.00 100.00 0.00 7 245.00 1,750.00 0.00
Sub-total 105*10,124.22*617,892.00*0.00*125*11,011.16*650,886.38*0.00*
Sewer fc Water
SEWER CONNECTION 8 280.00 0.00 0.00 27 945.00 0.00 0.00
WATER CONNECTION 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00
NEW SEPTIC SYSTE 15 1,370.00 0.00 0.00 20 1,950.00 0.00 0.00
DRNFLD a/OR TANK 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 2 100.00 0.00 0.00
SAC ONLY 4 6,300.00 0.00 0.00 24 22,250.00 0.00 0.00
SEPTIC CONNECTIN 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00
SEWER DISCONNECT 2 105.00 0.00 0.00
1 35.00 0.00 0.00
SEWER REPAIR 3 105.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 750.00 0.00
SEWER a WATER 3 210.00 0.00 0.00 1 70.00 0.00 0.00
UNDEFINED 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-total 36*8,420.00*0.00*0.00*79*25,470.00*750.00*0.00*
Sign
PERMANENT/POSTED 1 48.50 1,500.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
PER./FREE STANDS 1 21.00 450.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
TEMPORARY 2 35.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00
REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1
DATE OF RUN 08/03/99
«****PERMIT ISSUED REPORT
CITY OF ORONO
YEAR-TO-DATE
*****PAGE: ^
REQUESTER: CAROLE
-- CURRENT RANGE -
01/01/99 - 07/31/99
-- PREVIOUS RANGE -
01/01/98 - 07/31/98
PERMIT TYPE QTY
BASE FEB VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE PEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW j
Sub-total 4*104.50*1,950.00*0.00*1*35.00*0.00*0.00* ^
Fire
FIRE SPRINKLER 1 297.50 23,800.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1
FIRE SPRINKLER 3 1,698.88 135,550.00 0.00 1 3,650.00 292,000.00 0.00
Sub-total 4*1,996.38*159,350.00*•0.00*1*3,650.00*292,000.00*0.00*
User Defined
LAND ALTERATION 10 480.00 0.00 0.00 17 850.00 500.00 0.00 '
DOCKS 1 30.00 0.00 .0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
LAV«N SPRINKLER 6 210.00 0.00 ^jO.OO 19 665.00 0.00 0.00 <
Sub-total 17*720.00*0.00*0.00*36*1,515.00*500.00*0.00*
Grand-total 567**159,365.60**10,239,064.83**68,413.73**688**175,833.61**18,081,025.34**65,766.01**
■; ■
YEAR-TO-DATE
REPORT NBR. BPEERPT2-1
DATE OP RUN 08/03/99
***** permit FEE REPORT *****
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 01/01/99 TO 07/31/99
BUILDING MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER & WATER USER
BASE PEE 123,002.20 14,998.30 10,124.22 8,420.00 720.00
PLAN REVIEW 68.413.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 8,127.32 551.64 315.13 16.00 3.00
Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SAC 5,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
INVESTIGATION 4,314.50 0.00 0.00
•
100.00 100.00
DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 o.od’0.00 0.00
MAIL IN
MAIL IN
145.12
1.50
53.98 3.00
ESCROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 209,107.75 15,696.56 10,493.33 8,536.00 826.00
REPORT NBR. BPEBRPT2-1
DATE OF RUN 08/03/99
***** PERMIT FEE REPORT *****
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 01/01/99 TO 07/31/99
REPORT TOTAL 1
•
BASE PEE 159,365.60
PLAN REVIEW 68,413.73
SURCHARGE 9,093.72
Lie. SEARCH PEE 0.00
SAC 5,250.00
INVESTIGATION 4,514.50
DEPOSIT 0.00
•
MAIL IN
MAIL IN
208.10
1.50
ESCROW 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 246,847.15
PAGE: 1
REQUESTER: CAROLE
SIGN
104.50
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.50
0.00
106.75
FIRE
1.996.38
0.00
79.88
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.50
0.00
2.080.76
PAGE: 2
REQUESTER: CAROLE
YEAR-TO-DATE
REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1
DATE OF RUN 08/03/99
***** permit ISSUED REPORT *****
CITY OF ORONO
D&Mr;i? _ _ __ _nOC'T/T'^MC
REQUESTER:
PAGE: 1
CAROLE
01/01/99 -07/"*31/99 01/01/98 -07/31/98
PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW
User Defined A
SUBDIVISION 13 7,400.00 0.00 0.00 10 5,537.50 0.00 0.00VARIANCE297,250.00 0.00 0.00 44 11,560.00 0.00 0.00CUP92,000.00 0.00 0.00 1?1,950.00 0.00 0.00SKETCH PLAN 7 1,750.00 0.00 0.00 2 500.00 0.00 0.00VARIANCE/CUP 3 800.00 0.00 0.00 5 1,300.00 0.00 0.00VACATION10.00 0.00 0.00 1 300.00 0.00 0.00REZONING1350.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 O.QG 0.00RQST SIMILAR USE 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 250.00 0.00 0.00ZONING CODE AMEN 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00Sub-total 65*19,550.00*0.00*0.00*77*21,397.50*0.00*0.00*
Grand-total 65**19,550.00**0.00**0.00**77**21,397.50**0.00*^0.00**
I-'' v :,.‘J
REPORT NBR. BPEERPT2-1
DATE OF RUN 06/03/99
***** PERMIT FEE REPORT *****
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 01/01/99 TO 07/31/99
PAGE: 1
REQUESTER: CAROLE
USER REPORT TOTAL
BASS FEE 19,550.00 19,550.00
PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00
Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00
SAC 0.00 0.00
INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00
DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00
ESCROW
m
0.00 0.30
PERMIT TOTAL 19,550.00 19,550.30
."i
1999 RECAP OF CONTRACT CITIES
r
January February March April May June July August Septeinber October Noveinber December YfO Totals
Spring Park
Plan RevleM 40.46 274.14 0.00 2,760.22 2,063.10 1,576.90 3,095.31 9,810.13
Inspections 120.00 45.00 195.00 135.00 135.00 180.00 150.00 805.00
Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 175.00
TOTAL 185.46 344.14 220.00 2,920.22 2,223.10 1,781.90 3,270.31 10,945.13
No. Plan Reviews 1 1 0 4 4 4 5 19
No. Inspections 8 3 13 9 9 12 10 64
Minnetonka Beach
Plan Review 568.59 0.00 72.96 326.79 787.80 739.21 4,565.86 7,061.21
Inspections 60.00 45.00 150.00 135.00 60.00 180.00 300.00 930.00
Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 175.00
TOTAL 653.59 70.00 247.96 486.79 872.80 944.21 4,890.86 8,166.21
No. Plan Reviews 1 0 1 1 2 1 7 13
No. Inspections 4 3 10 9 4 12 20 62
839.05 414.14 467.96 3,407.01 3,095.90 2,726.11 8,161.17 W,111.34
REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1
DATE OF RUN 08/03/99
PERMIT TYPE
Building
SOL FAMILY-NEW
SF-ADD/REMODEL
8F-ACC STRUCTURE
DEMO/PRINCIPAL
COM-AOD/REMOOBL
COM-ACC STRUCTUR
INST-ADD/REMODBL
DEMO-ACCESSORY
ACC/GARAOES
Sub-total
Mechanical
QTY
3
29
8
2
1
0
1
1
1
46*
JULY 1999
***** permit ISSUED REPORT *****
CITY OF ORONO
COUNC\tW PAGE:
-- CURRENT RANGE -
07/01/99 - 07/31/99
\ 5 REQUESTER: CAROLE
rs IPrS^R)US rang
BASE FEE
12,931
11,853
1,475
160
441
0
888
30
139
27,920
.95
.25
.75
.00
.75
.00
.75
.00
.25
.70*
VALUATION
2.283.150.00
1.217.140.00
87.000. 00
0.00
29,975.00
0.00
85.000. 00
0.00
6,825.00
3,709,090.00*
PLAN REVIEW
8,405.77
6,364.74
914.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
90.51
15,775.56*
QTY
3
40
6
1
1
1
0
1
5
58*
BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW
8,999.25 1,635,000.00 5,849.51
6,861.75 539,509.50 2,547.03
1,127.25 75,000.00 719.06
50.00 0.00 0.00
1,137.25 150,000.00 739.21
34.75 1,000.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
30.00 0.00 0.00
1,135.75 78,950.00 738.25
19,376.00*2,479,459.50*10,593.06*
HEATING SYSTEMS 11 1,035.13 82,810.00 0.00 8 1,082.58 86,605.00 0.00
AIR CONDITIONING 9 369.13 25,895.00 0.00 3 105.00 6,987.00 0.00
FIREPLACE 3 105.00 4,636.89 0.00 3 105.00 5,308.00 0.00
VENTILATION 1 35.00 750.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
DUCT WORK ONLY 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,850.00 0.00
REMOVE OIL TANK 1 35.00 1,000.00 0.00 3 105.00 1,988.75 0.00
Sub-total 25*1,579.26*115,091.89*0.00*18*1,432.58*102,738.75*0.00*
Plumbing
FIXTURES 19 1,778.31 126,594.00 0.00 16 1,046.19 68,663.00 0.00
WATER METER 2 460.00 0.00 0.00 1 247.00 0.00 0.00
VACUUM BREAKSr 1 35.00 100.00 0.00 4 140.00 1,300.00 0.00
Sub-total 22*2,293.31*126,694.00*0.00*21*1,433.19*69,963.00*0.00*
Sewer fc Water
SEWER CONNECTION 3 105.00 0.00 0.00 4 140.00 0.00 0.00
WATER CONNECTION 0 0.00 0.00 ^ 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00
NEW SEPTIC SYSTE 2 200.00 0.00 • 0.00 1 100.00 0.00 0.00
DRNFLD 6/OR TANK 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
SAC CXILY 2 4,200.00 0.00 0.00 4 4,000.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-total 0*4,555.00*0.00*0.00*10*4,275.00*0.00*0.00*
User Defined
LAND ALTERATION 2 100.00 0.00 0.00 5 250.00 0.00 0.00
LAWN SPRINKLER 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 9 315.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-total 3*135.00*0.00*0.00*14*565.00*0.00*0.00*
Grauid-total 104**36,483.27**3,950,875.89**15,775.56**121**27,081.77**2,652,161.25**10,593.06**
REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1
DATE OP RON 08/03/99
BUILDING
BASE FEE 27,920.70
PLAN REVIEW 15,775.56
SURCHARGE 1,828.14
Lie. SEARCH PEE 0.00
SAC 0.00
INVESTIGATION 0.00
DEPOSIT 0.00
MAIL IN
KAIL IN
ESCROW 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 45,524.40
REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-l
DATE OF RUN 08/03/99
REPORT TOTAL
BASE PEE 36,483.27
PLAN REVIEW 15,775.56
SURCHARGE 1,953.66
Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00
SAC 0.00
INVESTIGATION 50.00
DEPOSIT 0.00
MAIL IN 33.48
MAIL IN 1.50
ESCROW 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 54,297.47
JULY 1999
***** permit fee report *****
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 07/01/99 TO 07/31/99
MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER & WATER
1,579.26
0.00
57.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
22.50
1.50
2,293.31
0.00
64.34
0.00
0.00
0.00'i*
0.00
10.98
4,555.00
0.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,660.94
0.00
2,368.63
0.00
4,558.00
*****PERMIT FEE REPORT
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 07/01/99 TO 07/31/99
*****
USER
135.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
0.00
185.50
PAGE: 37
REQUESTER: CAROLE
SIGN FIRE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PAGE: 38
REQUESTER: CAROLE
'' ' ‘X
* * ‘‘ » f ^ ♦
• '*■#
TUB, AUG 3, 1999, 5:09 PM
PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OP JULY 1999
PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM
4feC
m
01 1725 BOHNS PT RD
01 825 BROWN RD S
01 185 CRYSTAL CREEK RD
02 680 BROWN RD S
•72 1575 LONG LAKE BLVD
02 405 WILLOW DR S
02 420 TONKAWA RD
02 4423 NORTH SHORE DR
02 4465 FOREST LAKE LANDING
02 4448 NORTH SHORE DR
02 2430 NORTH SHORE DR
06 1350 REST PT CIR
06 1760 SHADYWOOD RD
06 970 WAYZATA BLVD
06 3675 TOGO RD
09 2695 COUNTRYSIDE DR W
09 4135 BAYSIDB RD
09 2985 WATERTOWN RD
09 4760 BAYSIDB RD
11 1462 PARK DR
11 3596 SHORELINE DR
11 2617 CASCO POINT RD
11 1900 SHORELINE DR
11 3554 LYRIC AVB
11 1905 HERITAGE DR
11 720 BIG ISLAND
11 1485 LONG LAKE BLVD
11 1790 SHADYWOOD RD
11 3229A CASCO CIR
11 2927 FARVIEW LA
11 1550 NORTH ARM DR
11 1725 EAGERNESS POINT RD
15 1185 TONKAWA RD
16 340 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S
16 845 OLD LONG LAKE RD
17 960 BROWN RD N
17 250 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S
18 50 WEAR LA
20 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N
24 425 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N
29 3625 LYRIC AVB
29 4455 WEST BRANCH RD
29 1740 SHADYWOOD RD
29 3125 FOX ST
30 2850 SOMERSET LA
30 170 CRYSTAL CREEK RD
46C
01 4355 BAYSIDB RD
01 3290 NORTH SHORE DR
01 3292 NORTH SHORE DR
01 4355 BAYSIDB RD
01 2064 SHADYWOOD RD
01 3145 JAMESTOWN RD
99/07/09 OR-
99/07/15 OR-
99/07/28 OR-
99/07/07 OR-
99/07/06 OR-
99/07/12 OR-
99/07/01 OR-
99/07/08 OR-
99/07/14 OR-
99/07/22 OR-
99/07/27 OR-
99/07/01 OR-
99/07/02 OR-
99/07/27 OR-
99/07/26 OR-
99/07/09 OR-
99/07/19 OR-
99/07/19 OR-
99/07/22 OR-
99/07/08 OR-
99/07/09 OR-
99/07/09 OR-
99/07/12 OR-
99/07/13 OR-
99/07/14 OR-
99/07/15 OR-
99/07/15 OR-
99/07/19 OR-
99/07/27 OR-
99/07/27 OR-
99/07/27 OR-
99/07/28 OR-
99/07/12 OR-
99/07/13 OR-
99/07/26 OR-
99/07/19 OR-
99/07/13 OR-
99/07/14 OR-
99/07/29 OR-
99/07/20 OR-
99/07/07 OR-
99/07/21 OR-
99/07/27 OR-
99/07/27 OR-
99/07/19 OR-
99/07/08 OR
011156
011650
011678
011598
011599
011601
011602
011627
011628
011670
011682
011604
011612
011679
011680
011624
-011651
-011658
-011659
-011625
-011629
-011632
-011633
-011644
-011647
-011652
-011653
-011660
-011676
-011684
-011694
-011696
-011595
-011636
-011681
-011503
-011638
-011635
-011702
-009573
-011621
-011669
-011673
-011683
-011466
-011618
99/07/07 OR
99/07/01 OR
99/07/01 OR
99/07/06 OR
99/07/07 OR
99/07/09 OR
011547
011609
011610
011617
011623
01163:'
17313153
14754902
14754902
14796777
14769252
14732588
14731231
16431344
14751160
14750918
00000000
00000000
1718,4345
00000000
00000000
18905600
14761153
14761153
15429000
00000000
18238046
00000000
14726539
00000000
14539177
18818232
14733397
18678164
14710532
15500043
15410304
14726539
00000000
24461495
17721449
00000000
24461495
00000000
17808528
00000000
19432610
17061806
15354515
13390674
14540456
14540456
34212419
35421166
35421166
28947600
34782452
35712525
CHARLES CUDD CO
PILLAR HOMES
PILLAR HOMES
BREN THOMAS HOMES INC
TERRY THOMAS J
LAKEWOOD DEVELOPMENT
LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION
TIMBBRLAND BUILDERS
TAYLOR KATHERINE
BRUCE BREN HOMES
JEFF MCCALL CONSTRUCTION
ALL-AMERICAN REC
POOL CONCEPTS
POOL CONCEPTS
DALPHIN POOL & SPA
SBLA ROOFING
SMITH WF ROOFING
ADDED VALUE EXTERIORS
SUBURBAN EXTERIORS
PLYMOUTH ROOFING
PEYEREISEN CONSTR
DANBERRY COMPANY
GATES BRUCE
WBSTURN CEDAR SUPPLY
SMITH WP ROOFING
WIDMER INC
SEMPLE EXCAVATING
WIDMER INC
M Ct S ROOFING
DOUG MCEVERS
KDS SERVICES INC
SUNSTATE CONCEPTS
MCNULTY CONSTRUCTION CO
SPORT COURT
SPORT COURT
KALMBS MECHANICAL INC
FLARE HTG & AC
FLARE HTG & AC
LAKESIDE PLBG & HTG INC
SCHERBER & SONS INC
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO
HOEFT
BOHN
OTT
CLARK
PRIBDEMAN
GAGE
MILLER
BLACKSTONE
SBNN
SCHOEN
ANFINSON
BRINER
BALES
KEMPF
KNITTED
HAYSSEN
BAURLB
BARNUM
KUTZ
MARQUARDT
NELSON
BARTBLL
SCOTT
ERICKSON
GREENLEY
URBAN
PAROPSKY
SACHSE
PBLTOLA
TATES
RENARD
TABOR
HILL
JAMES
FINE
BELL
SWANSON
CARLSON
TRANGSRUD
PRATE
16,
16,
7,
4,
4,
16,
3.
4,
4,
1,
85,
3.
5,
10,
4,
65,
14,
6,
650.00
000.00
500.00
000.00
000.00
000.00
000.00
000.00
800.00
000.00
950.00
000.00
000.00
600.00
300.00
000.00
000.00
000.00
000.00
300.00
975.00
000.00
000.00
700.00
000.00
934.00
900.00
850.00
500.00
000.00
446.00
680.00
000.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
000.00
000.00
000.00
000.00
680.00
500.00
000.00
000.00
825.00
BLBSI
WIRTJESS
14,400.00
6,500.00
6.500.00
4.800.00
1,000.00
2,077.89
TUE, AUG 3, 1999, 5:09 PM
PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF
PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET
PAGE 2
JULY 1999
ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION
25C
PL
22C
SW
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
02
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
99
25C
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
02
02
02
02
24
24
24
24
99
22C
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
8C
60
320
60
793
755
665
4375
3145
770
2650
2945
217
2118
1900
420
715
1360
1355
940
425
60
695
1425
2697
123
2515
525
539
2825
3290
4650
4455
2945
4764
793
3125
485
695
3435
2160
940
100
465
420
3290
1725
4785
160
420
CRYSTAL CREEK RD
TURNHAM RD
CRYSTAL CREEK RD
FERNDALE RD N
FERNDALE RD N
FERNDALE RD W
BAYSIDE RD
JAMESTOWN RD
BROWN RD N
LITTLE ORCHARD WAY
JAMESTOWN RD
NORTHGATB RD
SHADYWOOD RD
SHORELINE DR
BROWN RD S
FERNDALE RD N
VINE PL
VINE PL
BROWN RD S
OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N
CRYSTAL CREEK RD
FOREST ARMS LA
BAY RIDGE RD
KELLY AVE
CHEVY CHASE DR
KELLY AVE
HUNTER PASS
KEENE AVE
LITTLE ORCHARD WAY
NORTH SHORE DR
TONKAVIEW LA
WEST BRANCH RD
JAMESTOWN RD
NORTH SHORE DR
FERNDALE RD N
FOX ST
ORONO ORCHARD RD S
FOREST ARMS LA
CRYSTAL BAY RD
WAYZATA BLVD
BROWN RD S
BIO ISLAND
ORONO ORCHARD RD S
TONKAWA RD
NAVARRE LA
BOHNS PT RD
CREEKWOOD TR
GOLDEN VIEW DR
TONKAWA RD
99/07/12
99/07/14
99/07/27
99/07/27
99/07/27
99/07/29
99/07/30
99/07/14
99/07/01
99/07/02
99/07/06
99/07/09
99/07/14
99/07/20
99/07/27
99/07/28
99/07/29
99/07/29
99/07/12
99/07/20
99/07/01
99/07/06
99/07/07
99/07/12
99/07/14
99/07/16
99/07/20
99/07/20
99/07/27
99/07/27
99/07/28
99/07/28
99/07/01
99/07/23
99/07/27
99/07/28
99/07/02
99/07/06
99/07/16
99/07/29
99/07/12
99/07/08
99/07/19
99/07/19
99/07/19
99/07/22
99/07/26
99/07/26
99/07/26
OR-011639
OR-011648
OR-011685
OR-011688
OR-011691
OR-011703
OR-011706
OR-011646
OR-011608
OR-011611
OR-011614
OR-011630
OR-011645
OR-011664
OR-011687
OR-011699
OR-011704
OR-011705
OR-011642
OR'
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
009593
011606
011616
011622
011640
011643
011654
011665
011667
011690
011692
011697
011700
011605
011671
011693
011698
011613
011615
011657
011701
011641
011626
011661
011662
011668
011672
011674
011675
011677
34283677
35421166
33157500
39414211
35421166
38819000
36332561
34432819
39296767
32662510
35421166
39203800
00000000
34748366
38711491
39296767
38819000
38819000
P4796715
00000000
27844792
29337200
27863951
24796715
19693391
24233730
29335636
24724456
28251444
26826415
29337200
25884707
27844792
24720805
29383589
28663057
24340445
25510555
28274033
24738793
24796715
54270109
00000000
24731657
24724456
24282938
54791762
54791762
14731231
HEATING & COOLING TWO
FLARE HTG & AC
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO
KLEVE HTG & AC
FLARE HTG & AC
SEDGWICK HTG & AC CO
FIRESIDE CORNER
NARKIE HTG & AC INC
VOGT FRED & CO
ALLIED FIRESIDE
FLARE HTG & AC
CRONSTROMS HTG & AC INC
ABEL/B & C INC
A-ABC APPLIANCE & HEATING
VOGT FRED & CO
SEDGWICK HTG & AC CO
SEDGWICK HTG & AC CO
KINGSWAY PLUMBING
HOKANSON PLUMBING INC
CULLIGAN
GRABOW PLUMBING INC
KINGSWAY PLUMBING
ADVANCED BUILDERS
MATTHEW DANIELS INC
DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SBRV.
DONAHUE PLBG & HTG
ROBERT B. HILL COMPANY
D & M MECHANICAL
CULLIGAN
BUCHMAN PLUMBING CO., INC
HOKANSON PLUMBING INC
ALS MASTER PLUMBING
STANDARD PLBG & APPL CO
SOUTHTOWN PLBG
CLEARWATER SYSTEMS
MR ROOTER
NORBLOM PLUMBING CO
CITYVIEW PLBG & HTG
KINGSWAY PLUMBING
ZELINSKY
JOYNER
MITHUN
LINDBBRG
NELSON
HUTTER
WARREN
ACKMAN
MADEJA
NELSON
RASMUSSEN
LYMAN
NORWOOD
VENTRES
JOHNSTON
JAMES
O'BRIEN
WHITWORTH
STRAHMAN
CARLSON
CARPENTER
DOLEZAL
BELL
WAHLIG
KNUBSKY
MURPHY/JOYNER
CARLSON
HAMM
O'BRIEN
BROWN
KRAHENBUHL
JOHNSTON
PERKINS CONTRACTING
FADDEN CLIFF & SONS
DONAHUE PLBG & HTG
METRO GENERAL SERVICES
HAYES EXCAVATING
HAYES EXCAVATING
LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION GAGE
HAMM
JOHNSON
UNDERHILL
SCHMID
8.500.00
5.000. 00
1.459.00
750.00
3.000. 00
3.295.00
1.100.00
7.800.00
4.200.00
12,000.00
4.500.00
2,000.00
3.410.00
1.965.00
10,900.00
1.600.00
2,000.00
2.835.00
3.500.00
500.00
15.985.00
409.00
8,000.00
.00
.00
40.495.00
100.00
5.000. 00
1.000. 00
14.000. 00
1,000.00
2,000.00
5.785.00
1.920.00
17.000. 00
3.500.00
4.500.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
2.500.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
L„
TUE.'AOO 3, 1999, 5:09 PM
PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF
PAGE 3
JULY 1999
PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER
UD 01 1040 LOMA LINDA AVE 99/07/20 OR-011666 19728150
01 485 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 99/07/28 OR-011695 84450649
3C
104C
19
3C
200 WOODHILI. RD 99/07/09 OR-011594 00000000
OWNER LAST NM VALUATION
HAGE DESIGN/C.L.I.
ABLE SPRINKLER
KIRWIN
HAMM
.00
.00
.00
3,950,875.09*
TUB, AUG 3, 1999, 5:06 PM
NUMERICAL LISTING
PAGE 1
JULY 1999
PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION
OR-009573
OR-009593
OR-011156
OR-011466
OR-011503
OR-011S47
OR-011S94
OR-011595
OR-01159B
OR-011599
OR-011601
OR-011S02
OR-011604
OR-011605
OR-011606
OR-011608
OR-011609
OR-011610
OR-011611
OR-011612
OR-011613
OR-011414
OR-01161S
OR-011616
OR-011617
OR-011618
OR-011621
OR-011822
OR-011623
OR-011624
OR>011625
OR-011626
OR-011627
OR-011628
OR-011629
OR-011630
OR-011631
OR-011632
OR-011633
OR-011635
OR-011636
OR-011638
OR-011639
OR-011640
OR-011641
OR-011642
OR-011643
OR-011644
OR-011645
OR>011646
OR-011847
OR-011648
OR-011650
OR-011651‘
99/07/20 N
99/07/20 N
99/07/09 N
99/07/19 N
99/07/19 N
99/07/07 N
99/07/09 N
99/07/12 N
99/07/07 N
99/07/06 N
99/07/12 N
99/07/01 N
99/07/01 N
99/07/01 N
99/07/01 N
99/07/01 N
99/07/01 N
99/07/01 N
99/07/02 N
99/07/02 N
99/07/02 N
99/07/06 N
99/07/06 N
99/07/06 N
99/07/06 N
99/07/08 N
99/07/07 N
99/07/07 N
99/07/07 N
99/07/09 N
99/07/08 N
99/07/08 N
99/07/08 N
99/07/14 N
99/07/09 N
99/07/09 N
99/07/09 N
99/07/09 N
99/07/12 N
99/07/14 N
99/07/13 N
99/07/13 N
99/07/12 N
99/07/12 N
99/07/12 N
99/07/12 N
99/07/14 N
99/07/13 N
99/07/14 N
99/07/14 N
99/07/14 N
99/07/14 N
99/07/15 N
99/07/19 N
425
425
1725
2850
960
4355
200
1185
680
1575
405
420
1350
2945
60
770
3290
3292
2850
1760
485
2945
895
895
4355
170
3625
1425
2064
2695
1462
100
4423
4465
3596
217
3145
2617
1900
50
340
250
60
2697
940
940
123
3554
2118
3145
1905
320
825
4135
OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD
OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD
BOHNS PT RD
SOMERSET LA
BROWN RD N
BAYSIDE RD
WOODHILL RD
TONKAWA RD
BROWN RD S
LONG LAKE BLVD
WILLOW DR S
TONKAWA RD
REST PT CIR
JAMESTOWN RD
CRYSTAL CREEK RD
BROWN RD N
NORTH SHORE DR
NORTH SHORE DR
LITTLE ORCHARD WAY
SHADYWOOD RD
ORONO ORCHARD RD S
JAMESTOWN RD
FOREST ARMS LA
FOREST ARMS LA
BAYSIDE RD
CRYSTAL CREEK RD
LYRIC AVE
BAY RIDGE RD
SHADYWOOD RD
COUNTRYSIDE DR W
PARK DR
BIG ISLAND
NORTH SHORE DR
FOREST LAKE LANDING
SHORELINE DR
NORTHGATE RD
JAMESTOWN RD
CASCO POINT RD
SHORELINE DR
WEAR LA
OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD
OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD
CRYSTAL CREEK RD
KELLY AVE
BROWN RD S
BROWN RD S
CHEVY CHASE DR
LYRIC AVE
SHADYWOOD RD
JAMESTOWN RD
HERITAGE DR
TURNHAM RD
BROWN RD S
BAYSIDE RD
N 24 00000000
N 01 00000000
01 17313153
30 14540456
17 00000000
01 34212419
19 00000000
15 00000000
02 14796777
02 14769252
02 14732588
02 14731231
06 00000000
02 27844792
01 27844792
24 39296767
01 35421166
01 35421166
24 32662510
06 17184345
74 24340445
24 35421166
24 25510555
01 29337200
01 28947600
30 14540456
29 19432610
01 27863951
01 34782452
09 18905600
11 00000000
01 54270109
02 16431344
02 14751160
11 18238046
24 39203800
01 35712525
11 00000000
11 14726539
18 00000000
S 16 24461495
S 17 24461495
01 34283677
01 24796715
99 24796715
99 24796715
01 19693391
11 00000000
24 00000000
02 34432819
11 14539177
01 35421166
01 14754902
09 14761153
JAMES 3,000.00
JAMES 500.00
CHARLES CUDD CO HOEFT 1,285,650.00
SPORT COURT TRANGSRUD 14,000.00
TABOR .00
KALMES MECHANICAL INC 14,400.00
.00
RENARD 4,000.00
BREN THOMAS HOMES INC OTT 380,000.00
TERRY THOMAS J CLARK 110,000.00
LAKEWOOD DEVELOPMENT PRIEDEMAN 160,000.00
LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION GAGE 225,000.00
ANFINSON 4,000.00
HOKANSON PLUMBING INC WAHLIG 5,785.00
HOKANSON PLUMBING INC 15,985.00
VOGT FRED & CO HOTTER 4,200.00
FLARE HTG & AC 6,500.00
FLARE HTG & AC 6,500.00
ALLIED FIRESIDE 12,000.00
JEFF MCCALL CONSTRUCTION BRINER 4,000.00
CLEARWATER SYSTEMS HAMM 4,500.00
FLARE HTG & AC WARREN 4,500.00
MR ROOTER O'BRIEN 1,000.00
CULLIGAN O'BRIEN 409.00
LAKESIDE PLBG & HTG INC 4,800.00
SPORT COURT FRATE 6,825.00
DOUG MCBVBRS FINE 5,000.00
GRABOW PLUMBING INC WHITWORTH 8,000.00
SCHERBER & SONS INC BLESI 1,000.00
ALL-AMERICAN REC KNITTEL 30,000.00
KUTZ 2,300.00
PERKINS CONTRACTING .00
TIMBERLAND BUILDERS MILLER 15,000.00
TAYLOR KATHERINE BLACKSTONE 59,800.00
SELA ROOFING 29,975.00
CRONSTROMS HTG & AC INC ACKMAN 2,000.00
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO WIRTJESS 2,077.89
MARQUARDT 1,000.00
SMITH WF ROOFING NELSON 14,000.00
HILL 1,000.00
WIDMER INC .00
WIDMER INC .00
HEATING & COOLING TWO 8,500.00
KINGSWAY PLUMBING . 00
KINGSWAY PLUMBING JOHNSTON 2,500.00
KINGSWAY PLUMBING JOHNSTON 3,500.00
ADVANCED BUILDERS STRAHMAN .00
BARTELL 700.00
MADEJA 3,410.00
NARKIE HTG & AC INC NELSON 7,800.00
ADDED VALUE EXTERIORS SCOTT 16,000.00
FLARE HTG & AC ZELINSKY 5,000.00
PILLAR HOMES BOHN 540,000.00
POOL CONCEPTS HAYSSEN 10,000.00
TOE, AUG 3, 1999, 5:06 PM
NUMERICAL LISTING JULY 1999
PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET
PAGE 2
WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION
OR-011652
OR-011653
OR-011654
OR-011657
OR-011658
OR-011659
OR-011660
OR-011661
OR-011662
OR-011664
OR-011665
OR-011666
OR-011667
OR-011668
OR-011669
OR-011670
OR-011671
OR-011672
OR-011673
OR-011674
OR-011675
OR-011676
OR-011677
OR-011678
OK onri7*>
OR-011680
OR-011681
OR-011682
OR-011683
OR-011684
OR-011685
OR-011687
OR-011688
OR-011690
OR-011691
OR-011692
OR-011693
OR-011694
OR-011695
OR-011696
OR-011697
OR-011698
OR-011699
OR-011700
OR-011701
OR*011702
OR-011703
OR-011704
OR-011705
OR-011706
104C
99/07/15 N
99/07/15 N
99/07/16 N
99/07/16 N
99/07/19 N
99/07/22 N
99/07/19 N
99/07/19 N
99/07/19 N
99/07/20 N
99/07/20 N
99/07/20 N
99/07/20 N
99/07/19 N
99/07/21 N
99/07/22 N
99/07/23 N
99/07/22 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/26 N
99/07/26 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/26 N
99/07/28 N
•J'i/07/27 N
99/07/26 N
99/07/26 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/27 N
99/07/28 N
99/07/28 N
99/07/28 N
99/07/28 N
99/07/28 N
99/07/28 N
99/07/29 N
99/07/29 N
99/07/29 N
99/07/29 N
99/07/29 N
99/07/30 N
720 BIG ISLAND
1485 LONG LAKE BLVD
2515 KELLY AVE
3435 CRYSTAL BAY RD
2985 WATERTOWN RD
4760 BAYSIDE RD
1790 SHADYWOOD RD
465 ORONO ORCHARD RD S
420 TONKAWA RD
1900 SHORELINE DR
525 HUNTER PASS
1040 LOMA LINDA AVE
539 KEENE AVE
3290 NAVARRE LA
4455 WEST BRANCH RD
4448 NORTH SHORE DR
4784 NORTH SHORE DR
1725 BOHNS PT RD
1740 SHADYWOOD RD
4785 CREEKWOOD TR
160 GOLDEN VIEW DR
3229A CASCO CIR
420 TONKAWA RD
185 CRYSTAL CREEK RD
O/O WAY7.ATA HI.VI)
3675 TOGO UD
845 OLD LONG LAKE RD
2430 NORTH SHORE DR
3125 FOX ST
2927 FARVIEW LA
60 CRYSTAL CREEK RD
420 DROWN RD S
793 FERNDALE RD N
2825 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY
755 FERNDALE RD N
3290 NORTH SHORE DR
793 FERNDALE RD N
1550 NORTH ARM DR
485 ORONO ORCmVRD RD S
1725 EAGERNESS POINT RD
4650 TONKAVIEW LA
3125 FOX ST
715 FERNDALE RD N
4455 WEST BRANCH RD
2160 WAYZATA BLVD
685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N
865 FERNDALE RD W
1360 VINE PL
1355 VINE PL
4375 BAYSIDE RD
11 18818232
11 14733397
01 24233730
24 28274033
09 14761153
09 15429000
11 18678164
01 00000000
01 24731657
24 34748366
01 29335636
01 19728150
01 24724456
01 2472'4456
29 17061806
02 14750918
02 24720805
01 24282938
29 15354515
01 54791762
01 54791762
11 14710532
01 14731231
01 14754902
or. 00000000
00 uouooooo
16 17721449
02 00000000
29 13390674
11 15500043
01 33157500
24 38711491
01 39414211
01 28251444
01 35421166
01 26826415
02 29383589
11 15410304
01 84450649
11 14726539
01 29337200
02 28663057
24 39296767
01 25884707
24 24738793
20 17808528
01 38819000
24 38819000
24 38819000
01 36332561
SUBURBAN EXTERIORS
PLYMOUTH ROOFING
MATTHEW DANIELS INC
NORBLOM PLUMBING CO
POOL CONCEPTS
DALPHIN POOL & SPA
FEYEREISEN CONSTR
FADDEN CLIFF & SONS
ABEL/B & C INC
DUDA, LEON PLUMBING SERV.
HAGB DESIGN/C.L.I.
DONAHUE PLBG & HTG
DONAHUE PLBG & HTG
KDS SERVICES INC
BRUCE BREN HOMES
ALS MASTER PLUMBING
METRO GENERAL SERVICES
SUNSTATE CONCEPTS
HAYES EXCAVATING
HAYES EXCAVATING
DANBERRY COMPANY
LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION
PILLAR HOMES
SEMPLE EXCAVATING
MCNULTY CONSTRUCTION CO
GATES BRUCE
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO
A-ABC APPLIANCE & HEATING
KLEVB HTG & AC
ROBERT B. HILL COMPANY
FLARE HTG & AC
D & M MECHANICAL
STANDARD PLBG & APPL CO
WESTURN CEDAR SUPPLY
ABLE SPRINKLER
SMITH WF ROOFING
CULLIGAN
SOUTHTOWN PLBG
VOGT FRED 6 CO
BUCHMAN PLUMBING CO,, INC
CITYVIEW PLBG & HTG
M & S ROOFING
SEDGWICK HTG & AC CO
SEDGWICK HTG & AC CO
SEDGWICK HTG & AC CO
FIRESIDE CORNER
ERICKSON
GREENLEY
BROWN
BAURLE
BARNUM
URBAN
HAMM
NELSON
KIRWIN
CARLSON
JOHNSON
BELL
SENN
KNUBSKY
SWANSON
UNDERHILL
SCHMID
PAROPSKY
GAGE
nAt.KS
KICMl'F
SCHOEN
CARLSON
SACHSE
RASMUSSEN
JOYNER
CARPENTER
MITHUN
MURPHY/JOYNER
PELTOLA
HAMM
TATES
DOLEZAL
CARLSON
LYMAN
BELL
KRAHENBUHL
LINDBERG
NORWOOD
VENTRES
16.934.00
7.900.00
40.495.00
1,000.00
10,000.00
18,000.00
4.850.00
.00
.00
1.965.00
100.00
.00
5.000. 00
.00
10.680.00
70.000. 00
1.920.00
.00
4.500.00
.00
.00
4.500.00
.00
457,.00.00
2.600.00
1, lUU.UO
.00
4.950.00
65.000. 00
16.000. 00
1.459.00
10,900.00
750.00
1.000. 00
3.000. 00
14.000. 00
17.000. 00
3.446.00
.00
4.680.00
1.000. 00
3.500.00
1.600.00
2,000.00
1,000.00
85.000. 00
3.295.00
2,000.00
2.835.00
1.100.00
01
A O
Residence 24 Replacing ExistingU2Addition25Lifting Principal Residence03
A A
Garage/Attached 26 Well Abandonment04Garage/Detached ..27 Foundation Only05
A C
Porch 28 Temporary TrailerUd
A
Deck 29 Renovate/Remodel07
A A
Fence 30 Accessory Structure08
A A
Gazebo 31 Stairway to Lake09
1 A Pool 32 Retaining Wall10Re-slde 33 Entrance Monuments11Re-roof 34 Tree Removal12Tennis Court
13 Sign
14 Dock
15 Shed
16 Demo-Prlnclpal Structure
17 Demo-Accessory Structure
18 Move
19 Commercial
20 Institutional
21 Storm Damage Repair
22 1-100 Cubic Yards
23 101 Cubic Yards or More •
99 Undefined
9999
LOCAL USB CODES
Undefined
REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1
DATE OF RUN 08/03/99
PERMIT ISSUED REPORT
CITY OF ORONO
* * * * *
-- CURRENT RANGE -
07/01/99 - 07/31/99
PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY
User Defined
SUBDIVISION
VARIANCE
CUP
VARIANCE/CUP
Sub-total
4
7
2
0
13*
1,600.00
1,750.00
350.00
0.00
3,700.00*
Grand-total 13**3,700.00**
REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1
DATE OF RUN 08/03/99
USER REPORT TOTAL
BASE PEE 3,700.00 3,700.00
PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00
Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00
SAC 0.00 0.00
INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00
DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00
ESCROW 0.00 0.00
PERMIT TOTAL 3,700.00 3,700.00
0
0
0
0
0
00
00
00
00
00*
0
0
0
0
0
00
00
00
00
00*
2
8
1
2
13*
0.00**0.00 13**
** PERMIT FEE REPORT
CITY OF ORONO
FROM 07/01/99 TO 07/31/99
* * * * *
PAGE: 1
REQUESTER: CAROLE
-- PREVIOUS RANGE -
07/01/98 - 07/31/98
BASE FEE
700.00
2,050.00
250.00
575.00
3,575.00*
3,575.00**
VALUATION PLAN REVIEW
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00*
0.00**0.00**
PAGE: 1
REQUESTER: CAROLE
September 9,1999
Mayor Gabriel Jabbour
Orono City Hall
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
COOWCII. ^l1PFTING
SEP 1 3 1999
CITY OF OhUimo S’’D !
Ol 1 I w .*:o
Re: Closing of Long Lake Facility of WSI Industries, Inc.
Dear Mayor Jabbour:
The management of WSI Industries, Inc. has determined to close WSI’s facility at 2605 West
Wayzata Boulevard, Long Lake, MN 55356. This is a permanent plant closing and will affect
all of WSI’s shop employees and most office employees. There are no bunding rights for office
employees in connection with this plant closing, but unionized shop en^loyees may have
bumping rights, within the closing facility, according to seniority pursuant to a collective
bargaining agreement with WSI. Local 970 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters,
Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America represents WSI’s shop en^loyees. The
union’s business agent is George Behr, 3001 University Avenue S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55414.
We anticipate that the plant closing process will occur in stages, beginning on approximately
November 12, 1999, and will proce^ according to the following schedule:
Job Title Number of affected Employees Anticipated Schedule
Office Positions
Accounting/Receptionist
Production Control
Accounting Supervisor
Network Administrator
Production Supervisor
1
3
1
1
4
12-17-1999
12-17-1999
1-21-2000
1-21-2000
12-17-1999
Union Positions Anticipated Schedule starts 11-12-1999 and by seniority continues
Through 12-17-1999.
Machine Operator C
Truck Driver
Machine Operator B
Machine Operator A
Maintenance Electronic Mech.
Tool Cutter Grinder
Experimental Tool/Model Maker
12
1
5
40
2
1
2
2605 W. Wayzata Bivd. • Box 340 • Long Lake. Minnesota 55356*0340 • Phone 612/473-1271
Sq)tember 9,1999
Page 2
We expect that the entire plant closing process will be completed by December 31, 1999.
You may contact G)lleen Metcalf in WSl’s Human Resources Department at 612-476-7526 for
further information.
Sincerely,
WSl INDUSTRIES, INC.
Mich^PudU
President and CEO
T
°^^CIL Msetinq
' J 1999
•% •••
c/ryo vvo
sj: j 1 r v> VV
t Or ^ri ^,vQ
September , 19S9
Dear^rtAKt!. 1 vw>Cv*\loPt^ ! It has corAe to our attention as eAiployees
of W.S.I. industries of Long Lake,Minnesota that we could be soon to
lose our jobs. W.S.I purchased Taurus Numeric Tool Inc. of
Osseo,Minnesota as announced on February 16(1999. They also entered a
P'urchase agrreerrient for acquiring Bowffian Tool and Machining Inc. of
Rochester(Minnesota announced on June 28,1999 which they announced was
finalized on August 9,1999. On April 11,1999 W.S.I. entered a new
contract with its' employees with an expiration date of April 10,2002.
At contract negotiations there was no wiention of closing the Long Lake
plant or the purchase of Bowman Tool. On August 16,1999 W.S I. placed
a notice on the bulletin board that they may transfer all of the work
T rorA the Long Lake p'lant to the plants in Rochester and Osseo ’ hus
closing the Long Lake plant. This would affect approximately 83
P'eop‘le,ly of whom are laid off. We have efAp<loyees who have wc*rked here
from 2 years to 40 years,with active emp«loyees with at least 12 years
of service. Effective March 2,1992 all shop.employees took a 105t cut
in wages which was restored on October 11,1993 and the negotiated 2.2?t
increase due on October 11,1992,they patiently waited until October
11,1993 to receive, to aid the comp<any through a hard period. On Ap<ril
13,1992 the announcerrient was made to close the Covina, Cal if ornia
facility. On June 30,1993 W.S.I. sold Advanced Custom Molders in Texas
another company it owned. On June 27,1994 the announcement was made to
close the OwatC'nna,Minnesota facility. Through all of this the Long
Lake plant has remained op*en and it has financed all of these
purchases. We don't believe this is a good t<usiness decision to close
Long Lake and move the work to Osseo and Rochester. We have all bought
or built houses and have families in the surrounding communities of
Long Lake,Spring Park.Mound,Watertown, Maple
Plain,Plymouth,Winsted,Waverly,Wayzata,Howard Lake,Montrose,
Delano,Rock ford,Annandale and Buffalo to name some of them. We are
asking for your support to keep the Long Lake plant open and keep us
at work. We would t>e extremely greatful if you could send a response
to: Attn: Shop Committee
Care of W.S.I. Industries
2605 West Wayzata Boulevard
Long Lake,Minnesota 553S6
Thank you very much from the shop* employees of W.'S.I. Industries at
Lon*g Lake. You have our heart held thanks.
(Please see attached erApl*:*yees Bi*gnatures with riumber of years cf
service.)
____________““>^_
___m ______
...SQyyi,_______
JMy<n,_____
-?Jyirs,____
’^-
'.yxsL
.^EL_(S4J2,__
...2i
_>0^
/I
=SSifi^
yj-ifS
>
^20.ye^irS.
___ '^:}^^ p^ •PiirlQ:^ ..
.........
___50^
5Q/P.\
/5~ /I-5
-SLjSL:^fA3.
2<^j^^.
ML.
/ ‘7 l'4S .
- f
n/ 3«orcr«nMnwwi\rnw\wo\na#rw%\NrMf iXwiV ouo-M-Ari -moo
•Ml/tl/t UM
Q1^0IM#r
0M9SI0
nm MMM
nvo
•Ml *3M m«30Bv f mwmr nm MiaM^
TTwT
>10S3NNM JO UVIS JNi JO SilVl ]H1 UMNO
JS€HKOTr‘i:-:SSi
S9)Bpossy |[\l
V )H|japuyU
auasou Ss
ooDsauoePyi
Qvoa SS333V )4UVd
0V08 >mvd ST\m VOVS
V10S3NNIW ‘ONOdO
V
5|
M
COONcrL MtETINQ
SfP I 3 (999
CITYof
Municipal Offices
Strast Address:
2750 Kelley Parltway
Orono, MN 55356
Mailinf Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066
Steve White
VCI Capi al
P.O. Box 375
Long Lake, MN 55356
Dear Mr. White:
This letter is to update property owners in the City's industrial district regarding efforts by a
commercial property owner in Long Lake to convince Mn/DOT to include a frontage road,
connecting his property with Old Crystal Bay Road, as part of the Highway 12 upgrade projert. Bob
Erickson, who owns commercial property adjacent to Highway 12 and Industrial Boulevard in Long
Lake, has been lobbying Mn/DOT regarding access issues related to his property for some time. He
initially tried to gain support for an access ramp from new Highway 12 at Willow Drive. As you
may know, the Cities of Long Lake and Orono, as well as Mn/DOT, were strongly opposed to this
proposal.
Mr. Erickson nas now indicated that, as an alternative to an access ramp, he wants a frontage road
that would enable access to his property from Old Crystal Bay Road. Of course, this would require
a road\ ly crossing several properties in Orono's industrial district.
The City has, in the past, discussed a concept plan for a frontage road on the south side of current
Highway 12 that would provide a connection between Old Crystal Bay Road and either Willow
Drive or Industrial Boulevard. The concept plan involved a roadway toward the rear portion of the
industrial properties. The actual location of the roadway would be flexible, and would be
determined based on input from the affected property owners.
This concept could provide benefits in terms of traffic movement and access to future development
in the rear portions of the industrial properties. However, it also would impact the properties in
terms of the right-of-way needed, and the pattern of development that would be possible.
Telephone (612) 249-4600 • Fax (612) 249-4616
ik
. , *
Steve White
September 7,1999
Page 2
The City Council has taken the po^on that it will not support a frontage road solely to appease Mr.
Erickson. The City wants to obtain input from the industrial property owners regarding whether
the frontage road concept would be beneficial to the properties. Please call me with your questions
and comments regarding whether, or under what conations, a frontage road concept would be
beneficial to your property.
I am available to meet with you to provide information and answer questions regarding the frontage
road concept and frontage road options, if that would assist you in providing your comments to the
City. Please call me to schedule a meeting time, or to provide your comments regarding the frontage
road concept. Thanks for your help.
Sincerely,
Ronald J. Moorse
City Administrator
RJM/lsv
• - - ' . , V