Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-09-1999 Council Packet
-i Public A ttendance Meeting Date □ C ouncil Planning C ommission Park C ommission Other NAME (please print) 2.Q22£ii__QjtLki- ^ 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.. 9. 10.. 11. 12. 13._ 14.__ 15. mouA Please fill ouir^;^ m wormatow I^QUESTED BELOW FOR OUR COY RECORDS. ;fii fiv.'• V• : •.. ..■!;> -I X". •• '! .•; .••.;■..^ ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER (^1 *13 T^f. Lso/P /^ / ^ ZS^Y I AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 9,1999,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item’" on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL COP^ENT AGENDA Approve/Amend AUG 0 9 1999 APPROVAL OF MINUTES * ^ Regular Council Meeting of July 26,1999 Cn Y Ur UnUivy ^ARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Irene Silber, Representative /PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sandy Smith, Representative ^UBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) Zt^NG ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT #2410 Peter and Darsi Boynton, 1973 Fagemess Point Road - Variances and Conditional Use Permit - Resolution #2474 C. Steven and Susan Wilson, 325 Brown Road South/2150 Abingdon Way - Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement • Resolution #2479 Peter Andrea Co., 555 Stubbs Bay Road North - Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution #2492 Rick and Gail Luzaich, 2490 Old Beach Road - Variance and Conditional Use Permit - Extension of 60 Day Application Deadline ^-7^ #2501 City of Orono, 3601 Bayside Road - Variances and Conditional Use Permit - Resolution ^/^^#2504 Warren and Tana Garrett, 650 Brown Road North - Variances - Resolution .,. , #2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Willow Drive/Sixth Avenue North - Sketch Plan Review DNR Conveyance of Luce Line Parcel to Long Ridge Associates MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT >Tl. Request for Street Light - Old Beach Road Cul-de-Sac ^9 T2. Award Bid for Golf Course Mower * 15^ Request for Payment #1 - Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Project 14. Request for Payment#!-Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Project St. Edwards Church Request for Water Service CrrY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT -r Budget Adjustment to Reflect Acquisition of Saga Hill Park Area Access Easements 17. Schedule Work Session Regarding Housing Options AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 9,1999,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT ♦ 18. LICENSES * 19. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS im 08/02 08/04 08/05 08/09 08/16 08/19 08/23 08/26 09/01 09/02 09/06 09/07 09/13 09/20 09/27 Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. Highway 12 Design Review Committee Meeting, 5:30 p.m. Council Work Session, 7:30 a.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. Council Work Session, 7:30 a.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. Council Work Session, 7:30 a.m. Highway 12 Design Review Committee Meeting, 5:30 p.m. Council Work Session, 7:30 a.m. HOLIDAY, LABOR DAY Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. .. I COliwrii Micr^-vn ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 AUG 0 9 CM Y \jnKMMO ROLL The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Bob Sansevere, Richard Flint, Charles Kelley, and Barbara Peterson. Representing Staff were City Attorney Thomas Barrett, City Administrator Ron Moorse, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator Kris Jenson, Director of Public Services Greg Gappa, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA (#1) APPROVE/AMEND Items 9,11,12,13,15,16,17, and 18 were added to the Consent Agenda. Kelley moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *(#2) Regular Meeting of July 12,1999 Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the minutes of the July 12,1999 Regular City Council meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PRESENTATION OF THE CITY'S 1998 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Tom Kuehn, Finance Director, was present, and Ken Malloy of Malloy, Montague, Kamowski, Radosevich & Co., Independent Auditor, was present. Malloy briefly reviewed the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Year Ending December 31, 1998, noting that the audit was done in compliance with State taws and regulations. 1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 (1998 Financial Report, Continued) Kelley noted that the maximum property value increase for tax calculations was reduced from 10 percent to 8.5 percent. Kelley inquired what the City of Orono could do to reinstate the sales tax exemption. Malloy stated that the League of MN Cities has been attempting to get the sales tax exemption reinstated, and that the City of Orono could join with other municipalities in an attempt to get the exemption reinstated. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the reporting manner of the City was appropriate. Malloy stated that the City of Orono is well run and carries an appropriate amount of reserves to handle any unforeseen expenses. Malloy stated that he would prefer to present this report sooner in the year rather than in July, noting that there have been various issues that have delayed the report for the last several years. Malloy commented that the City of Orono might want to address this issue so the presentation can be given in April or May. Mayor Jabbour commented that staff turnover has played a factor this year. Malloy stated that the City of Orono generates slightly less revenue per capita than similar cities, which generally means that the City is spending less than other cities. Malloy commented that most of the City's revenues are generated through taxes and other fees rather than through government aid. Malloy noted that the spending trend of the City has remained fairly constant through the past several years. Flint inquired why the City of Orono receives less state aid than most other cities. Malloy remarked that most cities receive government aid in the form of LGA, with tlie City of Orono receiving none based on the aid formula. The City of Orono's tax base has also remained fairly constant over the past several years. Malloy stated that the City of Orono does reflect a high level of public safety services due to the fact that this service is provided by Orono to other cities. Malloy noted that the City of Orono does receive approximately $50,000 to $60,000 in net income from the public golf course. Malloy stated overall the City of Orono is in a good financial condition. Mayor Jabbour stated that in his view the City of Orono should attempt to have this report presented earlier in the year. Malloy commented that the report was delayed somewhat due to the need for some additional information. Mayor Jabbour thanked Kuehn and Malloy for all their efforts regarding this audit. iI c; ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Andrew McDermott, Representative McDermott stated that the Parks Commission is attempting to initiate improvements to the City's local parks now rather than delay them. McDermott commented that a letter was sent to a number of Navarre residents notifying them of an information meeting regarding improvements to the Navarre park. McDermott stated that next month hopefully the survey regarding Saga Hill Park will be ready. Mayor Jabbour noted that City Staff has been directed to construct a road and parking lot for Saga Hill Park. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - Lili McMillan, Representative Lili McMillan stated that the LMCD debated at their last meeting over whether the ordinance regulating multi-dock licenses should be changed. McMillan commented in her opinion the the LMCD is attempting to control what is normally a City land use issue through this ordinance and that the City should have the authority to regulate the number of docks. A public hearing regarding this issue is scheduled for Wednesday. Mayor Jabbour commented that the City of Orono does not allow a property owner to have a dock on Lake Minnetonka unless a primaiy structure exists on the property. McMillan commented that the LMCD is also proposing to change the measurement of the shoreline to more of a straight line rather than meandering along the lakeshore as part of this ordinance. Sansev€~e inquired what the impetus of changing the ordinance is. McMillan stated that the LMCD is concerned that townhomes lucy be constiucted along the lakeshore and that this is an effort to cut down ihe number of boats on the lake. McMillan commented that the harvesting of the eurasian milfoil has commenced, with no milfoil noted in any new areas. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Liz Hawn, Representative Hawn stated she would be available at tonight's meeting for any questions. 4 ■ ♦ ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26, 1999PUBLIC COMMENTSNone ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#3) #2308 BROOK PARK REALTY, 3760 SHORELINE DRIVE - LAKE MINNETONKA WOODS - REVIEW TRAIL AND UTILITY ISSUES Gaffron stated that final plat for this development is scheduled for the August 9th City Council meeting, but a few issues need to be clarified before approval. One of the conditions was that a trail be constructed down to County Road 15, which is within the boundaries of a flowage and conservation easement granted to the City in 1982. This trail is required to be paved as part of the resolution, and City Staff is recommending that the easement be revised or extinguished at this location to allow the hardcover associated with this trail. Flint stated in his view it should be a hardcover trail. The Developer stated that they were unsure whether the City Council intended that this trail be bituminous paving or whether it can be constructed of more natural materials. It was the consensus of the City Council to require bituminous paving of the trail. Gaffiron stated another issue is whether the water main should be looped rather than dead-ended to provide additional capacity for fire protection plus improved water quality. The loop could be a connection to the water main on the south side of County Road 15. City Staff is recommending looping of the water system, which would require acquisition of an additional width of easement between Lots 4 and 5, Block 3. The Developer stated a 20 foot easement currently exists and that the property owner would be willing to grant additional width to the easement. Mayor Jabbour stated the City of Orono needs to have ownership of this easement in the event that the water line needs to be repaired. Jabbour commented that the applicant needs to work with City Staff regarding placement of the water and sewer lines. Moorse inquired if the water main is placed over the sewer line whether that would be more expensive to repair. Tom Kellogg, City Engineer, stated in his view it would be more expensive, noting that this is the first time he has heard this proposal regarding the water and sewer lines. Mayor Jabbour suggested that the developer work with City Staff on this issue, noting that • % ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 (#2308 Brook Park Realty, Continued) the recommendation is to loop the water line. Kelley stated in his opinion the water line should be looped. Flint inquired what the suggested selling price for these townhomes is. The Developer stated that they are looking at approximately $140,000, which may rise due to development costs. (#4) #2488 GREGG AND THERESA KLOHN, 4455 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4322 Gregg Klohn, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated that the City Council approved variances to permit the applicant to reconstruct a 10 foot by 18 foot storage shed five feet off the side lot line and 15 feet off the street lot line. The Applicant is proposing to replace a shed that was removed following a storm. Klohn stated that he went back and measured his lot and has some reservations about having the proposed resolution approved. Klohn commented that his attorney has requested copies of any ordinances that relate to his application and has forwarded a letter to the City Attorney. Mayor Jabbour stated that the members of the City Council do not have that letter in their materials. City Attorney Barrett stated that the letter was faxed to him. Klohn commented that according to his view of the ordinance, he should be able to reconstnict the shed in the same location without the need for any variances. City Attorney Barrett stated he has reviewed the letter from Mr. Klohn's attorney and in his view the ordinance regarding non-conforming use does not apply to this situation. Mayor Jabbour commented that this is a non-conforming structure. Klohn remarked that this was the only ordinance that was forwarded to him regarding his application. Mayor Jabbour commented in his opinion he should not have voted in favor of this application rerttWiTiira •HK«l RTiliJlWUlW MlVt rtiiiinro [•TilfW ^TTiuj < r»i i 1 FI tj w w c^*CJ i M J I il»«l rtTivt M il •?• VII 111 illlJ r*nu«i •Hurt MM •lilliTU r«iMW«•)«t • r^ip«0¥:iii0ir»i¥ nriii iliVi ivmtr iSSFl^tKi ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26, 1999(#5) #2490 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - SKETCH PLAN REVEEWCharles Van Eeckhout, Applicant, was present along with Tom Loucks, Planner.Gaffron stated the Applicant is requesting City Council direction regarding potential rezoning of this site to allow higher density housing. This lot is comprised of 20 acres, with roughly 12 to 14 acres being dry buildable. This lot is located outside of the MUSA, but an issue for City Council consideration is whether this property should be developed with City sewer regardless of whether it is rezoned. A third item for consideration is whether Council believes the site should be considered for a Planned Residential Development. Gaffron stated the Applicant presented a sketch plan to the Planning Commission which called for nine sewered building sites ranging in size from 1.0 acre to 1.8 acre. The Planning Commission did not offer the Applicant much direction as they felt that the City Council should determine whether this property should be rezoned and whether City sewer should be provided. Loucks stated that this 20 acre parcel has unique characteristics, noting that the site abuts the City of Long Lake as well as the Long Lake sewer lines. The site is adjacent to some two acre developments as well as a number of one-third to one acre residential developments in Long Lake. Loucks requested that the City Council consider the possibility of a PRD for this property. Loucks stated the proposed lots range from 15,000 to 20,000 feet to l.S acres with a diversity of housing being contemplated. The Applicant will attempt to preserve as much of the natural features of tliis property as possible. Gafiffon stated that a zoning code amendment requires a 4/5's majority vote, noting that this property would not need to be rezoned in order to do a PRD if density standards are met. The number of units being proposed does exceed the number that could be accomplished through a standard two acre plat, and a PRD does not allow the City to increase the density, hence this proposal for nine lots on 12 -14 acres would require rezoning. Kelley commented that he is not in favor of rezoning, but would support a PRD with seven lots and hookup to City sewer. Mayor Jabbour thanked the Applicant for his efforts in attempting to preserve the natural characteristics of this property. Kelley remarked that he was unsure whether onsite sewer sites would be available on this site due to the topography and wetlands that exist. Flint inquired if the zoning is not changed, how a PRD would assist the Applicant. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999(#2490 Charles Van Eeckhout, Continued)Loucks stated under a PRD they would be able to have lots that are less than two J 'res as long as the density standard is not exceeded.Flint inquired what the density standard is for this lot. Loucks stated the area will need to be calculated, but in his view there is approximately 16 acres of upland. Loucks stated they are willing to work with City Staff on this matter. Sansevere stated he was in agreement with Kelley on the density. Peterson commented that she also was in agreement with Kelley regarding the density. Mayor Jabbour stated that in his view a PRD would be appropriate, noting that he is amenable to extending City sewer to this property. (#6) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD - VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Rick Luzaich, Applicant, was present, along with Phil Reznick, Attomey-at-Law. We’mberger stated that the Applicant's reforestation plan was denied at the last City Council meeting, with a re\dsed plan having been submitted by the Applicant today. The Applicant is proposing to add a number of trees, which increases the canopy cover over the entire property. The City's consulting forester is recommending a minimum spacing of 25 feet which will allow for greater canopy coverage when the trees mature. Bedker is recommending that any plan submitted by the Applicant restore a minimum of 90 percent of the estimated 14,450 square feet of tree canopy that was removed. The Applicant's plan achieves 83 percent canopy restoration over the 25 year period. Bedker is ready to recommend adoption of the plan with the recommended changes. Weinberger stated the issues for consideration by the City Council include the right to re^new the subject property by City Staff to ensure eventual full restoration on the property. St^is recommending that a letter of credit be on file with the City to ensure reforestation of this property as well. Reznick stated according to his understanding, the Applicant's landscape archite^ was to meet \^th the City's forester, which has been done, and the recommendations of the City s forester 8 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999(#2492 Rick and Gail Luzaich, Continued)have been met. Reznick stated the Applicant has concerns regarding City access to this property over the next 25 years. The Applicant is requesting that his revised plan be approved in order that work may commence on restoring this property.Mayor Jabbour stated the City of Orono is very interested in restoring this property, noting that most of the trees removed were protected by City Code. Jabbour commented that the majority of the trees proposed to be replaced are located in areas not protected by City Code and that a mutual agreement needs to be reached regarding reforestation of this property. Reznick remarked that he would be willing to draft a document containing language regarding access, but that in his opinion 25 years is too long. Mayor Jabbour commented that according to Code, six inch trees in the 0-75' setback are protected and two inch diameter trees are proposed to be planted. Reznick suggested that a time period be agreed upon rather than going by the dimension of the tree. Reznick stated in his view the Applicant is not going through this expense just to cut the trees down once they reach sbc inches. Mayor Jabbour commented that in his view it will take approximately seven to eight years for the two inch trees to reach a diameter of six inches, and that he would be agreeable to the Applicant's attorney submitting some language regarding access. Sansevere inquired whether any of the neighbors have been contacted regarding this plan and the impact on their sight lines. Weinberger stated that the neighbors have not been approached regarding this proposed site plan, and that a copy of the proposed plan could be sent to the neighbors for their comment. Luzaich commented in his opinion what was existing before was not very appealing and the proposed plan will enhance the property. Luzaich stated he did inxate both of his neighbors to attend tonight's meeting, noting that they are not in attendance. Luzaich commented that trees exist on both sides of his property which prevents the adjoining property owners from having a clear view. Kelley stated he would like the neighbors to be supplied with a copy of the proposed plan for their comment. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether this revegetation plan was acceptable to the City Council. Kelley commented that the plan appears to be fine. r ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 (#2492 Rick and Gail Luzaich, Continued) Peterson stated she is not in support of the plan in that the Applicant's proposal does not restore the shoreline back to its original state. Reznick stated the Applicant is willing to place the trees 25 feet apart, which will accomplish the 90 percent canopy cover, and that this plan will enhance the appearance of the property. Weinberger commented that the trees do fall within the bluff impact zone. Luzaich stated that a majority of the trees that were removed were rotting and split down the middle due to windstorms over the years. Reznick stated that the proposed plan will accomplish a 90 percent canopy cover, which exceeds what existed before they were removed. Mayor Jabbour noted that some of the neighbors were upset over the removal of the trees. Reznick suggested that the proposed plan be approved so work can commence on the reforestation of this property, noting that the plan has been revised in accordance with the City forester's recommendations. Mayor Jabbour stated that the City Council is not bound by any recommendations of City Staff or Planning Commission, noting that the City Council has the final say in this matter. Jabbour commented that the City has an established policy on how these properties should be handled, which needs to be complied with. Jabbour recommended that this matter be tabled. Reznick stated that they are requesting this be approved subject to the appropriate language being worked out with the City Attorney regarding access. Mayor Jabbour conunented that the City Council needs to address the reforestation of this property, and that in his opinion the access issue can be worked out with the City Attorn^, but that any recommendation of the City Attorney is not binding on this Council. Sansevere remarked that the City Council needs to consider whether approval of this application will set a precedent. Elizabeth Hawn, Planning Commission Representative, stated that the Planning Commission was reluctant to forward this application on without reviewing a revised plan, but that in the interests of time, the Planning Commission wanted this matter acted on before the end of the planting season. Reznick stated he would like the City Council to act on this revised plan, noting that the j' ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 (#2492 Rick and Gail Luzaich, Continued) recommendations of the City's forester have been complied with. Luzaich remarked that he would be willing to move some of the proposed trees away from the property line closer to the middle to create the canopy cover. Mayor Jabbour recommended that the Applicant move a few trees to the middle. Kelley stated the Applicant will need to appear before the City Council to get the language approved regarding access. Mayor Jabbour commented the neighbors will also need to be notified regarding tlus application. Luzaich stated he have his landscape architect submit a revised plan to the City's forester and City Staflf for their review. Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to table Application #2492,2490 Old Beach Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (Recess taken at 9:20 p.m. - 9:27 p.m.) (#7) #2502 ORONO SELF SERVE, 2160 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 432j Bill Wear, Applicant, was present, along with John Zadurski, Griffin Petroleum Representative. Kelley commented that the existing Highway 12 corridor will eventually become the downtown Orono corridor upon completion of the new Highway 12, and that a design review committee should have been established to review the architecture and design along Highway 12 in order to provide some uniformity as to what is being constructed in that area. Kelley stated that he has reservations and concerns regarding the lighting at the new Super America store. Kelley commented that he does not have a clear understanding of the type of lighting that is being proposed with this canopy. Mayor Jabbour inquired what color the canopy will be. Wear stated it will be a tan canopy with a red stripe around it. The lighting will be recessed and directed down. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 (#2502 Orono Self Serve, Continued) Sansevere inquired whether the height of the canopy will be similar to the height of the Super America. Wear stated the canopy is 14 feet high. Sansevere commented that the Super America is considerably higher than 14 feet. Zadurski stated that he is currently working on this project, and the proposed lighting for this canopy is what is known as Scotsdale lighting, which is designed to be recessed and to shine down rather than out. Zadurski stated the canopy itself will not be illuminated, with this type of lighting being rather restrictive. Sansevere inquired what the width of the canopy is. Zadurski stated that the canopy is 24 by 60 feet and will cover the three gas pumps. Peterson inquired whether the signage will be changed. Wear stated that he would like to change the signage. Jenson stated any changes to the signage would appear before the City Council. Wear stated that the conditions regarding signage are outlined in Resolution 2073. Weinberger remarked if the conditions are met as outlined in the Resolution, he will not need to appear before the City Council. Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4323, a Resolution Granting a Variance to Allow a Front Yard Setback and a Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Canopy to be Constructed over the Existing Gas Pumps at Orono Self Serve. Kelley inquired what the candle power of the proposed lighting will be as compared to the Super America. Zadurski stated that the lighting at Super America is an older style lighting and that this lighting is more restrictive. Jenson commented that she did review the photometric figures for these lights, which are very minimal. The City Code does not specify any certain limits, but in comparison to other lights, the light levels were concentrated under the canopy and would not have a great impact on the property lines. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 (#2502 Orono Self Serve, Continued) Mayor Jabbour commented that City Staff should perhaps look at developing some type of guidelines regulating lighting to avoid it from becoming too subjective. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Kelley Opposed. (#8) #2503 CITY OF ORONO VACATION OF ALLEY ON PLAT OF BERGQUIST & WICKLUND’S ADDITION, ADJACENT TO SAGA HILL PRESERVE - RESOLUTION NO. 4324 Flint stated he has reviewed the revised resolution and does not have any concerns regarding the vacation. Flint inquired when the road will be constructed. Mayor Jabbour commented that hopefully City Staff will be able to commence construction on the road shortly after ownership is acquired. Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4324, a Resolution Vacating an Unimproved Alley Within the Plat of "Bergquist and Wickland's Addition to Bergquist and Wickland's Park" in the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the acquisition of an alternative access to the Saga Hill Park area from the Fairview Covenant Church and Winton Palmer. Kelley inquired whether the City should vacate this alley without the other parcel being acquired. Mayor Jabbour stated that that is contained in the City's purchase agreement. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#9) EXTEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLETION DATE - RESOLUTION NO. 4325 Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4325 a Resolution Requesting Extension of the Due Date to December 31,1999, for Review of the City of Orono Comprehensive Plan for Consistency with Amended Metropolitan Council Policy Plans. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ’’1 i. J ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT (#10) PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL NIGHT OUT - RESOLUTION NO. 4326 Peterson stated she would like to encourage all of the City Council members to attend the National Night Out sponsored by the North Tonka Crime Preventation Coalition and the Orono Police Department being held at Nelson Beach in Long Lake and Rick's Super Valu on Tuesday, August 3, 1999, 6:00 to 9:00 p.m. Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4326, A Resolution Proclaiming Tuesday, August 3,1999, as National Night Out VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Mayor Jabbour stated he recently had a meeting with the Mayor of Long Lake who indicated that the Long Lake City Council reviews the minutes of the Orono City Council. Jabbour commented that Mayor Bash was questioning why Orono was discussing an intersection on Highway 12 across from the Service 800 building without involving Long Lake when half of the intersection lies within Long Lake. Jabbour indicated to Mayor Bash that the City of Orono has been very cognizant of the interests of Long lake regarding this intersection. Mayor Jabbour stated that a wrong impression may have been left after the Fox Ridge public hearing with some of Orono's residents regarding hookup to City sewer. Jabbour stated that the City needs to look at whether some of the property owners along the proposed route will be able to hook up and how the costs will be apportioned to each resident. Jabbour indicated that the City should also look at the possibility of increasing the size of the pipe to accommodate additional properties. Kelley inquired whether the Fox Ridge project will be subsidized by the City. Mayor Jabbour indicated that it will not be. Kelley commented that he does have some concerns about assessing the entire cost of this project to the residents on Fox Ridge when other residents may be able to connect up to City sewer on these other streets. Mayor Jabbour suggested that perhaps City Staff review the policy regarding assessments and how they are allocated, noting that the costs may increase for this project if the size of the pipe is increased. Jabbour suggested that a work session be scheduled to discuss this item further. Mayor Jabbour inquired why the Stubbs Bay Dock application was not before the City Council tonight. Moorse stated it was his understanding that the Planning Commission wanted to have the ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINliTES FOR JULY 26,1999 (Mayor/Council Report, Continued) application reviewed by the Parks Commission, Mayor Jabbour commented that some action should be taken to curb the number of accidents that are occurring in the area Big Island. Kelley stated Council Member Peterson and himself attended a meeting regarding the Long Lake Fire station, noting that they need to move ahead to select an arclutect so th^ can proceed with a design process. Kelley commented that the City of Long Lake has not been reimbursed by Mn/DOT for other consulting work that has been done. Moorse stated that Joe Lynch has indicated that they are not sure whether a cooperative agreement with Mn/DOT is required, which needs to be worked out. Mayor Jabbour stated he had suggested that the Fire Department look at ABC Trusses as a possible fire station. Kelley stated that the exact location for a new fire station has not been determined. Mayor Jabbour stated that the City of Orono needs to look at increasing City Staffs pay noting that the City of Orono has not kept up with other cities. ENGINEER REPORT *(#11) STUBBS BAY ROAD PROJECT - Mn/DOT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT RESOLUTION NO. 4327 Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4327, a Resolution Authorizing the City of Orono to Approve Mn/Dot Cooperative Agreement for Stubbs Bay Road Closure Project. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#12) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT - ST. EDWARD’S CHURCH SEWER AND WATER MAIN Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Request for Payment for Installation of Sewer and Water Ser/ice to St. Edward's Church in the amount of $11,911.00 to S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc., with the Church to be billed for this work. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 *(#13) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #4 - SHORELINE DRIVE/HERITAGE SANITARY SEWER PROJECT Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Request for Payment #4, Heritage/ Shoreline Sanitary Sewer Project to G.L. Contracting in the amount of $11,099.33. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#14) AMENDMENT TO THE CITY’S PAY SCHEDULE Moorse stated that an adjustment to the City's pay schedule as it relates to the building inspector was recommended to enable the pay range to more closely match the market pay level. However, in discussing this recommendation, it appears that this is not the appropriate action, and that the City should maintain the position at its current level in the pay schedule and authorize a market adjustment that enables the position to be paid at the Level 8 pay range. Moorse indicated that the City of Oronc has kept up with the cost of living, but that other cities are generally higher. Kelley inquired whether this reflects the industry standard. Moorse stated the increase is reflective of what other cities are paying. Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to authorize a market adjustment for the Building Inspector position to be paid at the Level 8 pay range. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#15) APPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT ASSISTANT Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the appointment of Heidi Berry to the position of Administrative Support Assistant at the Level 4, Step 1 pay rate of $12.79 per hour, effective July 19,1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#16) APPOINTMENT OF ON-SITE SEPTIC SYSTEM INSPECTOR Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the appointv^,ient of Christopher Pence to the position of On-Site Septic Inspector at the Level 6, Step 1 salary of $30,851.00, effective August 9,1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. « < ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 •(#17) APPOINTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTOR Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the appointment of Marc Davis to the position of Building Inspector at the Level 8, Step 2, pay rate of S18.24 per hour, effective August 2,1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. •(#18) PAYMENT REQUEST - HDR ENGINEERING, INC. - HIGHWAY 12 NOISE/ VIBRATION STUDY Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the payment of 75% or $15,000 of the total noise/vibration study cost to HDR Engineer, Inc. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#19) FIRE INSPECTION SERVICE OPTIONS Moorse stated the City of Orono would like to hire an individual to act as a fire inspector. The City has completed an RFP process and has selected William Meyer, who currently provides fire inspection services to the City of Wayzata. Moorse stated that due to some issues regarding liability insurance coverage, it was suggested that it may be easier to hire Mr. Meyer as part-time employee of the City, rather than contracting for his services through the City of Wayzata. Moorse stated that the City Council could direct that City Staff continue to work with the City of Wayzata regarding the employment of Mr. Meyer, or they could direct City Staff to proceed with hiring Mr. Meyer as a part-time employee. Mayor Jabbour commented that the City of Orono is in need of a fire inspector. Kelley inquired whether his hours would be limited in some fashion. Moorse stated that the City needs him to inspect ail the industrial buildings as well as all the marinas. This does not require substantial hours. Sansevere suggested that a report be submitted every month or two regarding the number of hours. Kelley commented that his services will be needed especially if the two cities are consolidated. Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to authorize hiring of William Meyer to a temporary part-time Fire Inspector position for a six-month period effective July 27,1999, at a pay rate of $22.00 per hour with no benefits. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 26,1999 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT None *(#20) LICENSES None *(#21) BILLS Keller moved, Peterson seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Sansevere requested that City Staff review the allocation of funds to the Anoka County Sheriffs OfiBce in the amount of $200.00. ADJOURNMENT Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 10:26 p.m. ATTEST; Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk t Application Date: 60 Day Deadline: 7/22/98 Waived COllMril AUG 0 9 \m REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CU Y or onvJivO DATE: 8/4/99 ITEM NO.3 Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2410 Peter Boynton 1973 Fagemess Point Road Conditional Use Permit for Land Alteration in the Lakeshore Setback Variances for lot area, hardcover in the 0-250’ setbacks, lakeshore setback, rear yard setback and grading within 75' of Lake Minnetonka Zoning Dbtrict: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 acre) Lot Area:10,350 sq. ft. (.237 acres) Exhibits:A B C D E F G Draft Resolution Revised Site Plan Elevation Views Floor Plans Zoning Application Worksheet Hardcover Woricsheets Staff Report Application: The applicant is proposing to remove the existing structure and construct a new residence. (Sec Enclosed Site Plan - Exhibit B). The proposed residence (Elevation Views - Exhibit C) requires multiple variances for lot area and width, hardcover in the 0'-250' setbacks, lakeshore setback, rear yard setback and a Conditional Use Permit for Land Alteration in the 75* Lakeshore Setback. Proposed change in grade within the lakeshore setback would allow for a walkout within the lower level. Total excavation of the site is 124 cubic yards of soil, all within 75' of the lakeshore. The proposed cut calculations are shown on the survey. This is a unique property as it is located with lakeshore on both sides of the property. However the lot contains only one 0-75' lakeshore setback. Fagemess Point Road separates the lot fix>m Lake Minnetonka to Ae southeast. n This application requires the following variances:Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit new residential construction on a lot 76.54’ wide where 80’ is required and 10,350 sq. ft. in lot area where 17,424 sq. ft. is required; and to permit the residence to be located 47.59’ from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka where 75’ is required and 21.01’ from the street lot line where 30’ is required. Section 10.22, Subdivision 6 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit 638 sq. ft. (11%) hardcover in the 0-75’ lakeshore setback where 1,285 sq. ft. (22%) exists and no (0%) hardcover is allowed. Section 10J2, Subdivision 2 and SecHon 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to pennit U56 sq. ft (30%) hardcover in the 75-250’ lakeshore setback where 1,496 sq.ft. (33%) and 1,122.5 sq. ft. (25 /o) is allowed. This application requires a conditional use pennit per the following section of the Zoning Code: Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to permit grading of 124 cubic yards for the purpose of creating a walkout of the lower level of the residence within 75’ of the lakeshore. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote to: Approve the variances as proposed on the most revised site plan and to deny the conditional use permit to permit regrading and excavation of 124 cubic yards of shore land. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the variances as proposed on the most revised site plan and to deny the conditional use permit to permit regrading and excavation of 124 cubic yards of shore land. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution (Exhibit A). ./■ A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2; SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6; SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (1&2) SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 AND DENY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #2410 WHEREAS, Peter Boynton and Darsi Boynton (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 1973 Fagemess Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Lot 7, Fagemess, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance vdth Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on August 17, 1998; October 19, 1998; October 16, 1998; January 19, 1999; and July 19, 1999, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and A WELEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances and a conditional use permit to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 and Section 10.22, Subdiwsion 1 to permit new residential constmction on a lot 76.54' wide where 80' is required and 10,350 sq. ft. in lot area where 17,424 sq. ft. is required; and to pennit the residence to be located 47.59' from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka where 75' is required wd 21.01' from the street lot line where 30' is required; Section 10.22, Subdivision 6 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to pennit 638 sq. ft. (11%) hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback where 1,285 sq. ft. (22%) exists and no (0%) hardcover is allowed; and Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to pennit 1,356 sq. ft. (30%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback where 1,496 sq.ft. (33%) and 1,122.5 sq. ft. (25%) is allowed, and a conditional use permit to permit grading of 124 cubic yards for the purpose of creating a walkout of the lower level of the residence within 75' of the lakeshore per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. Page 1 of 5 1 I Minnesota: 1. 2. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2410. The property is located in the LR-IC Zoning District, where 1/2 acre or 21,780 sq. ft. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of .28 acres or 10,350 sq. ft. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 19, 1999 and recommended approval of a variance on a vote of 7 to 0 to permit new residential construction per the site plan dated July 20, 1998 and revised June 10, 1999, and to deny a conditional use permit for grading within 75* of the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. 4. The Planning Commission made the following finding s of fact: The property was developed prior to the adoption of the Zoning Code. B. The total hardcover and structure on the lot will decrease upon redevelopment. C.The building envelope on the property is minimized by the lot being underazed for the Zoning District. Developing the lot without variances would not be possible. D.Adjacent properties are developed closer than 75' to the lakeshore. The new residence would not encroach the average lakeshore setback. E.The City's Comprehensive Plan and Zomng Code encourages protection of the shordand areas around natural waterways to include preserving the existing grade around Lake Nfinnetonka. The applicants have proposed grading 124 cubic yards within 75' of the lakeshore to create a w^out for the lower level of a new residence. It is the position of the City to not alter the grade within the lakeshore setback. Page 2 of 5 I * i r ‘ 1 ! I ! ; , 1 5, The City Coiindl finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby denies the conditional use permit application as described above and grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 and Section 10,22, Subdivision 1 to permit new residential construction on a lot 76.54’ wide where 80' is required and 10,350 sq. ft. in lot area where 17,424 sq. ft. is required; and to permit the residence to be located 47.59' fi-om the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka where 75' is required and 21.01' firom the street lot line where 30' is required; Section 10.22, Subdivision 6 and Section 10,56, Subdmsion 16 (L) (1) to permit 638 sq. ft. (11%) hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback where 1,285 sq. ft. (22%) exists and no (0%) hardcover is allowed; and Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to permit 1,356 sq. ft. (30%) hardcover in the 75-250’ lakeshore setback where 1,496 sq.ft. (33%) and 1,122.5 sq. ft. (25%) is allowed. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not wth the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 9, 2000). Page 3 of 5 2.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3.The undersigned iq}plicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and asagns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of August, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of August, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 1 I. •{ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of . 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) )ss. ) On this day of . 199 before me a Notary Public within and n 1 for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC 'i Page 5 of 5 r-nrr^iSfrti i u TT < tio. Mt:VN , vc niM' ....... U‘» V. v.'...;if.~ • We\0+*T ■ j/z. \aJAV l3>fc.t^t.6N 'H+E- F€v^\^ *Tl4^ Upfte-i^ uev^L- ce\U>aG A^usr BS USB/i); ... ' E)C\iTmCi G«>VCE ** “ ■* ““ •■ U««V fV«%\ ^A'/‘17 ^K^<o£. FLoo(U • •. • .* • • V« !'•••** 1 • . I . j ! -A Jn 'C ••o •V I'-O*tmmmm lO-M mmm mmmm • i •1 • • • —— ♦ —*V«l**o" • •*0 Mt. m •* 4 ^ • • . * ^ft%« te^T €vtvAfi®w rs»iT«tNMO Kr 0«^e f MT. »>-.|*.o- • ^ . 4 -O CITY OF ORONO « ZONING APPLICATION WORKSHEET BUILDING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATION Application number 1 0 Zoning Classification L | Cy * !> Lot Size Table Lot Area Lot Width Lakeside Yard Side Yard Street Yard Required 2\,1S0 ico'15 'to'so' Proposed )0,iSD V'Hl5 \l-Sl'21.Ol Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 10,1504 ’• Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0'-75 ’6 8h>0 1 izS (1 *(/I •?«>y<-5 75'-250'qtjcfp (zs<7o) 250’-500' '-------------- • • • • • m • % •• 500'-1000' —- • Notes: HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 7S-2£0’ 2SO-500*500-1000* F /cf2 EXTSTTNC HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. Hcuse S.F. Lsat*WUi:h X X X B. Garage • • • •( C Driveway X X D. Sidewalk .^Va.yWjB —X X E. Palio/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER-IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE * B S*gtoQ X 100 pPOPOSED HARnrOVER IN ZONE A. House Leafih vm X X B. Garage C Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plasnc X X X SJF. SJ. SJr. ss. SJ. SJ. an S.F. . ' . S J. SJ. SJ. S.F. SJ. SJ. S.F. SJ. A 3j: b ,^i£_s.F. ST. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. ST. ST. ST. ST. G. Odter total KARDC0%*ER in ZONE total PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B _ _ X 100 i •i 4 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) O-Tf / i 2£0-iS0* F.?n.«mNC HARDCOVER TN ZONE A. House Las^ B. C’arags • • • • 4 C Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Pado/Dedc F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X X X X X X X X X X G. Other .‘£.6^4^-' '■ TOTAL HARDCOVER- IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B___X 100 ppnpnSFD HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Leegtli Widb B. Garage C Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Pado/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plasric G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B ____ 500-1000’ sjF. s^. Sj. SJ. ^ A*?) S J. sj. ■ .SJ. ^AA 'hafi SJ. SJ. SJ. ss. S.F. SJ. SJ. I S.F. \Ai^(o SJ. A AA30u^ B % S.F. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. Ill ST. ST. S.F. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. F 2«F2 A ST. ST. xlCO - A ^A^Q ST. B • t r / Date of Application: 7/22/98 Most Revised Date: 6/8/99 60 day limit: Wdved TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:July 15,1999 SUBJECT: #2410 Peter Bo)mton 1973 Fagemess Point Road Conditional Use Permit for Land Alteration in the Lakeshore Setback Variances for lot area, hardcover in the 0-250’ setbacks, lakeshore setback, rear yard setback and grading within 75' of Lake Minnetonka Zoning District: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 acre) Lot Area:10,350 sq. ft. (.237 acres) Exhibits:A B C C2 C3 D D1 E F G Hl-3 11-4 Application Plat map Topo Map Enlarged topo map Existing topo based on survey Previous proposal #1 Previous proposal #2 Watershed District letter City Engineer letter Permit record Historical records for 1979 variances Previous Minutes Application: #2410 Peter Boynton 1973 Fagerness Point Road PC‘-I/I9/99 pag0-l -4 i Tnfim-VYI h f !: t' < Date of Application: 7/22/98 Most Revised Date: 6/8/99 60 day limit: Waived Application: The applicant is proposing to remove the existing structure and building a new residence. (See Attached). The proposed residence requires multiple variances for lot area, hardcover in the 0-250' setbacks, average lakeshore setback, lakeshore setback, rear yard setback and a Conditional Use Permit for Land Aheration in the Lakeshore Setback The applicant is also proposing to change the grade in the lakeshore setback to allow for a walkout. (See Attached). The applicant is proposing to excavate and remove approximately 124 cubic yards of soil. The proposed cut calculation are shown on the survey. This is a unique property as it is located with lakeshore on both sides of the property. However the lot contmns only one 0-75' lakeshore setback. Fagemess Point Road separates the lot from Lake Minnetonka to ifre southeast. Pertinent Ordinances: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 5. LR-IC Standards-Section 10.25 Subd. 6. Lakeshore Setback and Average Lakeshore Setback-Section 10.22, Subd. 1 B and Section 10.56, Subd. 16. C. Structural Lot Coverage—Section 10.03, Subd. 14, C. Hardcover —Section 10.22, Subd. 1 and 2, Section 10.56, Subd. 16, L. Height-Section 10.25, Subd. 6 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16, H. Conditional use permit for land alteration-Section 10.03, Subd. 19 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16, J. »2410 Peter Boynton 1973 Fagemess Point Road PC-1/19/99 page-2 Date of Application; 7/22/98 Most Revised Date: 6/8/99 60 day limit: Waived ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IC District Standards Lot Area 1/2 acre Lot Width 100’ Street Yard 30’ Side Yard 10’ Lakeside Yard 75 ’ and ALS* ^Average Lakcshore Setback Subject Property Lot Area and Yards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside 10,350 sq. ft. (.237 acres) 76.54’21.01'to comer of proposed garage 13.52' to proposed garage 47.59 to comer of proposed house The subject lot does not meet lot area or lot width requirements. For new construction, variances are required for lot area and lot width. The proposed garage encroaches into the required 30’ setback from die street. The proposed side yards conform to the LR-IC standards. The proposed residence encroaches into the required 75 ’ lakeshore yard. The plan has been revised to avoid encroaching into the average lakeshore setback. Hfiighl The Zoning Code requires that the height for this proposed residence be measured from the garage level i^ch is proposed at 934. The allowed height from the garage side to the midpoint of the roof is the 974 elevation. Theplansthat were previously submitted exceed this height requirement The applicant has redesigned the plan to a 30' structure. No Height variance is required. U2410 Peter Boynton 1973 Fagemess Point Road PC-I/19/99 page-3 1 Date of Application: 7/22/98 Most Revised Date: 6/8/99 60 day limit: Waived Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Structural Coverage Allowed Structural Coverage Proposed Variance Requested 10,350 sq. ft (.237 acres) 1,552. 5 sq. ft. (15%) 1,498 sq. ft., (14.5%) none The origmal plan proposed by the applicant was for an additional 250' of structure. The residence and garage have been redesigned to conform to code standards for structural coverage. Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0'-75'5,860 sq. ft.1,285 sq. ft. (22%) None 638 sq. ft. (11%) 638 sq. ft. (11%) 75'-250'4,490 sq. ft.1,496 sq. ft. (33%) 1,122.5 sq. ft. (25%) 1,356 sq. ft (30%) 233.5 sq. ft. The proposed residence exceeds the allowed hardcover limits in both the 0'>7S* and 75'*-2S0' setbacks. However the total hardcover has been reduced from the original plans. Land Alt The proposed survey indicates that the applicant intends to excavate and remove a total of 124 cubic yards from the property. Excavation is proposed within the 75' lakeshore setback to create a walkout and correct some minor drainage issues. Generally, the City of Orono discourages any grading or excavation in the lakeshore setback. This proposal is not consistent with the Zoning C^e and Comprehensive Plan and may have a negative impact on the lake. mio Peter Boynton 1973 Fagerness Point Road PC-I/I9/99 page—4 Date of Application: 7/22/98 Most Revised Date: 6/8/99 60 day limit: Waived STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant has stated on the application form that the grade and existing conditions and lot size limit the property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that there is a hardship for lot area, lot width and the 75' lakeshore setback. However, the proposed plan requires additional variances. Staff finds that no hardship exists for hardcover in the 75-250' setback to allow 30% hardcover in addition to the hardcover being requested within 75' of the lake. The conditional use permit for land alteration in the 0'-75' setback is contrary to City policy and would establish a present for allowing substantial changes in lakeshore yards to create walkouts along the lakeshore. Therefore, staff cannot recommend approval of the excavation plan. Staff recommends denial of the requested variances and conditional use permit ■ : • I »24I0 Peter Boynton 1973 Fagemess Point Road PC-1/19/99 page-5 Application it 1 ^ Date Received"^ 7/2z/^fi Amount Paid ^2 gt? • ^ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION f=A/!|F=n2KESS~ 'pA/iJT 'EnAP Property Identification Number (T.I.D.^ (a - IH — 2^^ N OOOo _____________ Attach legal description to application if not mcluded on required survey. Date Property Acquired l^tO _______________^(month/year) I (do) ^ noTb also own the adjacent parcels of land.' Pi^ent use of property: ___presidential ___pother (specify)_____________________ Zoning District: LiZ ” ^ Address:____ Phone fliome"! 7*/2 City: {jtUSf\J> Phone fworic l V*7/ Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone OiomeX Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: ___ Estimated Constmction Cost $ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover I . ! Lot Coverage Setback:' . ^ Front Side Rear . . ^ Average Lakeshore « HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property .^conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: (attach additional sheets if necessary) L REQUIRED SUBMITTALS ^3. ^ All of the following information must be submitted hv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete;f p 1. Completed Application Form \ 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center. 348-327 IV ' Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'A" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views provide one (1) copy %Vi ” x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include *ndihe(s) of'applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 4. ^ 5. P6. 7. 8. The Applicarit and Properly Owner must sign this application. Please, remember that your yarlapce application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true »d correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hei'eby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of mvestigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature • • 01 «vestigation and venlK Date Applicant tnust* have* all submittals into the-City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and C9uncil. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements'to have’ an authorized agent attend m your place and to advise the Building & Zoning OJBfice of this chahge prior to the meeting.’*, 8 • ! • I I g®IFIFii'S T® SliilABraO®® > (32: fc-'tsr-'C3 >1 0 • • • • • • o U. c m 4»c/> > c. LU ^ CO • 2 4,' c a:ou. m c. o» o 11 ^t:o. " ^ LU UJ LU o c o c. O O o m Oo I m ,1? =J-^: 5 “ *tu ? SIa p • &ee o q:o .1 I !S J 000 ' (X/ C • SUBjeCr PGoPeiti^i r » -V- 3 FAC|IEM6s$ |s>tPt>. LNC& a -'ll! v!ro Or *2 s -ti ‘ t I J i «1 -...' uu I 4-4 cd > 2cu dHf S O CO O 53 ct;o 8 ■4 I <s\. fc. >/<?, cTH/* • ' 3 I OU I feapU aI m V gPu C Q- oo 0\ ON nri u« Oi K S C/3 I OOo\ OV •-» • • qS e LT f. A s . Gray Freshwater Center H'.vys. 15 419, fJa’/arre Man: 2500 Shadywood Road Exce'sior.MN 55331*9578 Phone:(612)471-0590 (612) 471*0682 EmaB: adminOffiinnehahacreek.org Web Site: wwwjninnehahacreek.org Board of Managers Pamela G.BIixt « James Calkins Lance Fisher Monica Gross Thomas W.LaBounly Thomas Maple, Jr. Malcolm Reid Nnud on ncyMpa^ eonlMig ailuit 30% poit oonwntr MStt. Minnehaha Creek "my Watershed District f Improving Quality ofWater, Quality of Life December 30, 1998 Elizabeth Van Zommeren City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 RE: Review of Proposed Projects Dear Ms. Van 2!ommeren: from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The following comments apply: activity*”* ** wetland boundary a permit will be required for that .1 ^f®sult from the planned activity. 4. #2450: This proiect will be reouired tn nmvidA px>n>*. ---------*___________ lls?^‘requirTd**'^ Srthcr qu^^ opportunity to comment. Please call me at 471 -6282 if you have Sincerely, 1 Hafher District Technician C:\FILES\cominents\OfDno_I23098.doc m Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & q vl^ Associates Engineers & Architects Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderlik itnd Associates. Inc. Is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Principals: Olio G. Bonestroo. P.E. • Joseph C. Anderilk. P.E. • Marvin L. Sorvala. RE. • Richard E. Turner. RE. • Glenn R. Cook. PE. • Robert G. Schunichi. RE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. • Robert W. Rosene. RE. and Susan M. Ebcrlin. C.P.A.. Senior Consultants Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. RE. • Keith A. Gordon. RE. • Robert R. Pfefferle. RE. • Richard W. Foster. RE. • David O. Loskota. RE. • Robert C. Russek. A.I.A. • Mark A. Hanson, RE. • Michael T. Rautmann. RE. • Ted K.FIefd. PE. • Kenneth P. Anderson. RE. • Mark R. Rolfs. RE. • Sidney P. Williamson. RE.. LS. • Robert F. Kotsmith • Agnes M. Ring • Michael P. Rau. RE. • Allan Rick Schmidt. RE. Offices: St. Paul. Rochester. Willmar and St. Cloud. MN • Mil^raukee. Wl Website: wwwbonestroo com January 5,1999 Elizabeth VanZomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Bo.x 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 •n*- 0:; ' ^‘5 • .H.; ;o Re: Peter Boynton Residence File No. 139-2410 Dear Liz: We have reviewed the preliminary grading plan for the proposed new home construction at the Peter Boynton residence. The site is located at 1973 Fagemess Point Road in the northeast quarter of Section 18. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1. Access: The drawing submitted for our review contains a lot of information and is difficult to understand at times. It is unclear whether the proposed driveway will be paved or gravel. We recommend the new driveway be bituminous or concrete to prevent sediments from washing to the lake. 2. Grading: The grading plan shows the site being lowered by approximately 4 feet near the middle of the site. The proposed plans indicate grading up to the lot lines of the neighboring properties on both sides of the Boynton property. The size of the existing lot and the amount of proposed grading may impact the neighboring properties and mi^t require easements. The grading plan shows a 944 contour tying into a 946 contour along the northeast lot line, plans should be revised and corrected. Proposed contours northeast of the garage scale 2:1. We recommend that slopes that will be nudntained not exceed 3:1. Erosion control is a big concern as the lake borders two sides of the property. An erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any grading and maintained throughout construction until vegetation is established. 3. Drainage: Impacts to the lake should be minimized. Phosphorous loadings leaving the site should be limited to a maximum of 0.28 pounds/acre/year. The site lends itself to some sort of best management practice (BMP) such as vegetated buffer strips to treat runoff leaving the site. 4. Easements: Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of -ways. « • • Please contact me at (604-4863) if you have'any questions regaitling this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Tom Kellog Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 612-636-4600 ■ Fax: 612-636-1311 asac:^ rtrV'liSf iO: /iiOM: sjATt*; Council Jeanne A. Mabusth# Zoning Adroinistfato; November 6, 1979 A. • ^1* ./UBJfcICT:®524 A. R, Bnckatrom, 1973 PagerncsQ:Point Road - ^RIAN .’.OJJiNC DISTRICT - LR-lC .;r. Backstrom requests a street setbackof 2* for ' a now ejarage 20* x 28* • to replace a kO* x 18^*^"garagc located ir-o the right of way of Pagornego Point Road, The ..cconci part of his request involves on 8* x 28* addition f.Ci the rear of the house. The proposed improvements will .euuirv a hardcover variance of 266 o.f. or 5%. The :r..provuricnts will add approximately 434 B.f. of hardcow . The addition will add 224 s.f, or 7.5%. The ..u. ejurueje (subtract existing-garage) will add 210 s.f. #r 7.14. i . I • ‘ / • vii.: i’lanning c^iaslon reeosameiMlB !aj^rovki'bt ^ for b.cK,rSSndt iiJ L»rn at AO/ax* ‘o&o Mdihon t*'9t - 7^^ 3Cpd i- ^ ,J PPlitl r--v» Wji • • • %!l •: :v % • • • #: ."..? f.iit-inj*; 1 c* :i«*i.*f'ridjd , to •i)>|jM>vc* I ho ..M-o M-qiic!it of O, K. Ki.shor, '5400 tJorfih .Shore ! v»*, |>f*r h.e P] anni ofj Crmuni ?;sion rocomjnoiulationn, foil cv./r.: 1 7ho grnvol clrivcwayfi .serving the non-conforming g/irageo nre to be rcinovccl nncl scodod ?.The new driveway should not exceed the allowod additional hardcover of 360 nq, ft. 3. ^ y 'tThe applicant toT^hb advised that patios, cement walks, ctc’arb coiilsldcrod hardcover Motion, Ayes (5) - May^ •' . •; s' t Alan Olson, City-Plannerentered Into the record the v.'irianco request of A. n. nacV.r.trom, 1973 Fagerneso Point hoad, dated Wovenber 6, 1979, wliich stalest Mr. hacV.st rom retiuostn^* n-st reet sethock variance of 33* for a new garage 20* X 28* to replace a 20* X 10* r.irage located 12* ihto the right o'f <vay of Fngcrnes.s Point -load. The second part of his request Involves .'sn h* >: 28* addition to the of d.ho house. The t./f.pOM-d )i:.provencntn wl 11 recpiiic a haT«h.*ovci: a A . ^ ^ • I .it i.\oi:e of 266 ft. or 9%. The .Ipiprovenenis will .n!d aj>pioxlnat oly 434 isq, ft, of h.»r<lcovr*r or 1^..f.li. The addition will add 22 4 r.q,‘;ft. or 7,r,9, )>e (subtract '.'xistuig u.ir/ige ) will, «dd :io ••ij, rt, cr 7,1^1, ••• I • j VAK.TANCB 1973 Fageraofis Po 4524 A. n, Hacknlrom j • • % ••• •. •» L •/;• V; - iv-t*I:-.: *V . .; ..S'::*. : •;'. • . • I*. .* -‘.•I N*v< .1 A I.. i /iCLV.iJ i. j jr>/> Subdivision, Pro! I».nInn ry j.‘ Subdlvlfllon*, IMr^l • —M------------------------ 1 *'.{/*■] JON’ Vote; ___«^ For Against Abstention HOT](»:C .. . .................... . "** . . ■iiDPxaY£d^ouc-apiaijJA«Ll<>iLJ,ox^A,jfi:Dat.y.arilj5iLtfcackJtor.ir^^ ....... 6,,nflH,g. _____fin;;jnq fl hardship,of tQPQciraphv . vvvs-'yi*-/ *. • '■ •■«■•. ojad-XhjO. j;_2.SJ&l;j_addJU!LiQ.n ____; lgA^gj5L.aQsLiixjj8J;jlJi?^JiQmQ.-con«^ : • j_________v*<<^ iiuu;jir# X JLfj[iili-nM fl 1 _____J.J 'I'vrn l ion i. bgth-9-B__Pfl>L the Plant! Ing Comnit ssjLoo_Rocoiniiionc1atlonii. _____Gr.rfioc jg to be ono story with a flat roof. ;-v •. j’. . kv. A.‘. -.0.^. V. • I. -■.* 6% *>•. —UK*' •'•'l • ♦♦ »• »*• • #*>I • »♦ —» — ■! ^ ••♦#•• ••• •.-•••I '■ • *‘**“■*■■*“—■■” .................................. ~-———— vVAv*; vVvVV. •/.•/.• y. /"I •»Vy.-»VV.yf.Vi!i''.V ! ■: w r J. 8|:%' . ... % . % fVlTi ■Vvjfe • :-.-V2'^23 V.*;.y.-.'*TJryr'A'Jri»ryf*<:yf**»V*iV*Tlr%Vyrytn^rA';rAy/AvVA';VA-vV-;;AoV.VA^vVvV,f:W?*A^^^^ Dr.APLlKK D/vTE _Novem ber 1 3|. 19R0 ___________ ■ **f»a*»—^ ___ for submittal of new infornvjtton (application \i\ny bo ^:>noidcvcd fonnally wltb(Irav.»n If Information or explnnation in not provided). •• • • —>• for Work I’ermic .'ippl Irn c J on for v.’ork t o begin ___ far v;ork to be coriipl eted V• •VV'j.'K rr^iHlTS AKT. K!T.»inHi-D - contnci lUiIldlnj; Tnf:j}<.’Ctc>r V.C’rr.rr Im-j*lonir;p. i -. : ’ \ai ii.&¥ i' ;‘; -v C .r * • •; •r-: ■ . ?• •• <v, •..’•I • •■ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR AUGUST 17,1998 (#2407 LANE MOORE, Continued) Lindquist noted the Applicants were just requesting a variance to the side yard setback and not to hardcover. the^f stated they will be removing an existing shed and share the driveway with the neighbor to. Welnbeqjer Indicated the size of the planter is 88 square feet. There were no pubiic comments. Stoddard moved. Schroeder seconded, to approve Application #2407,3438 Livingston Avenue, the granting of a variance to the side yard setback requirements to allow construction of a 16* X 22* garage located three feet from the side lot line and to permit the 88 square foot planter currently existing on the property. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#15) #2409 GEDNEY AND EMILY TUTTLE, 1225 SHORELINE DRIVE - VARIANCE, 9:58 p.ml - 10:02 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Tuttle were present. Weinberger remarked the Applicants are proposing to construct a 12* x 24* shed to provide winter storage for lawn furniture and other equipment. The property contains a wetland located at the back portion of the property which restricts the Applicants from building on that part of the lot. The house is constructed without a basement due to the high water level which leaves the residence without adequate storage on the property. Weinberger stated present hardcover in the 75*-250* :akeshore setback is 45.6 percent and this application proposes to increase hardcover to 46.4 percent. Staff recommends approval based on the existing hardship. There were no public comments. Chair Smith inquired why the Applicants didn’t add on to the existing garage. Mrs. Tuttle indicated they had the understanding they were prohibited from doing so. Stoddard moved, Hawn seconded, to approve Application #2409,1225 Shoreline Drive, granting of a variance to hardcover in the 75*-250* lakeshore setback to allow the construction of a 12* x 14* shed. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#16) #2410 PETER BOYNTON, 1973 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD - VARIANCES, 10:03 p.m. 10:22 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. Boynton was present. Page 17 ■ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR AUGUST 17,1998 (#2410 PETER BOYNTON, Continued) Van Zomeren stated the Applicants are requesting variances for street, hardcover and average lakeshore setback. A conditional use permit Is also required because the Applicant is proposing to significantly change the grade In the 0-75' setback, which was originally not requested by the Applicant nor included in the legal notification. There are multiple issues with this application that still need to be addressed before any recommendation can be made by City Staff. Boynton stated originally the house was built as a cottage back In 1920, has a hand dug basement, and needs to be torn down. The request for variances to setback are being sought because the r house cannot be built without them. Boynton requested the Planning Commission give guidance on what hardcover and setbacks would be acceptable. Schroeder inquired If the house was tom down and a new structure built, how would the application be handled. Van Zomeren stated If the house Is reconstructed, the lot would be treated as a vacant lot and would need to meet ail the requirements for that lot. Schroeder suggested the Applicant design a house that conforms to all the variances. Boynton staled In his opinion the land is unbuildable without variances. Stoddard stated he would like a footprint for the house that doesn't call for variances. Boynton commented he could possibly utilize the existing foundation, noting In 1978 an addition to the house was constructed with a good foundation, which comprises approximately one-ihird of the foundation. Gaffrc.'^ stated once a house Is tom down, any grandfather rights are forfelte'l, Chair Smith questioned whether the Planning Commission could act on this application at the present time. Van Zomeren remarked typically the Planning Commission does not approve of grading In the 0-75' setback vrith no additional structure In the 0-75* setback. Chair Smith asked for public comment on this application. Cathy Lee, 1965 Eagerness Point Road, stated she was under the impression the house has to be moved back, noting she would prefer the house on the existing footprint to keep the house In line with the rest of the houses on the road. Van Zomeren commented Staff needs more information on the adjoining properties as well as a new survey which outlines the proposed structure and hardcover. CsLindquist suggested the Applicant try to limit the house to 1,500 square feet and 25 percent total hardcover. Cathy Lee remarked the area Is on a pennisula and moving the house back v/ould not affect drainage into the lake. Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to table Application #2410,1973 Eagerness Point Road, to allow the Applicant time to submit revised plans. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 18 1 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, OCTOBER 19,1998 Z (1^2434 Carol Olson, Kid’s Art School, continued) Van Zomeren commented to the Planning Commission that a $250 fee was charged for this application, because there is not a reduced fee schedule for conditional use permit amendments. Stoddard recommended adding the condition that the City is not liable for the construction or use of the tipi since it may not be covered under the City’s Building Codes. Van Zomeren stated she will discuss the construction of the tipi with the building inspector. Hawn moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2434, 2180 North Shore Drive, amending the conditionai use permit permitting the erection of a tipi in the area designated per Staffs drawing, with the recommendation that the $250 fee be waived. Olson indicated she was fine with the motion. Van Zomeren stated the building permit is based on the value of the structure, and will discuss the fee with the building inspector. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. OLD BUSINESS: CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS (#5) #2399 MURIEL SENN, 4448 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES, 6:40 p.m. • 6:41 p.m. The Applicant was not present. Van Zomeren stated the Applicant has indicated she will be revising her drawing plans and requested the matter be tabled. Staff will send out the appropriate letter to extend the 60 day time period. Hawn moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application #2399,4448 North Shore Drive, per the Applicant's request. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#6) #2410 PETER BOYNTON, 1973 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD - VARIANCES, 6:42 p.m. -7:15 p.m. Peter Boynton was present. • • • Van Zomeren presented the Planning Commission with photographs of the existing structure. Van Zomeren stated this application was before the Planning Commission in August where it vras tabled to allow the Applicant time to submit revised plans. The Applicant is now proposing to build a new house and garage in the same lopation as the existing house and garage. The building inspector has reviewed the property and has determined that the structure is not structurally suitable for repair and remodeling. Van Zomeren commented the property is located in the LR-1C district, which has a minimum lot size of one-half acre, and is comprised of .237 acres. The Applicant is requesting a variance to the iakeshore setback, a variance to the average lakeshore setback, a side yard variance to locate the garage five feel from the west property line, a variance to the street yard setback, variances to Page 2 r ■f • ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY. OCTOBER 19,1998 (#2410 Peter Boynton, continued) hardcover In the 0-76' setback and 75-250 ’ setback, a variance to the structural lot coverage, and a height variance. A conditional use permit is also required to allow for any grading In the.0-75’ setback. Van Zomeren stated the proposed hardcover in the 0-75' setback Is 1,054 square feet or 17.9 percent where 1,258 square feet is currently existing. The revised plan is also proposing hardcover of 29.64 percent where 32.9 percent is currently existing. This application should be treated as a complete tear down and should meet all required code provisions. Van Zomeren noted the Applicant was advised at the previous meeting to limit structural coverage to 1.500 square feet and to minimize the need for setback variances, which the proposed plan does not comply with. Chair Smith inquired whether the new plan is proposing to go up with the new structure. Van Zomeren replied the proposed structure does exceed the standard height requirements. Boynton stated they are attempting to design something that will fit over the old building pad. Boynton commented the existing foundation is not suitable and the house is deteriorating. Boynton's builder stated the street is lower than the existing residence. Schroeder inquired when the property was purchased. Boynton stated they purchased the oroperty three years ago with the intention of remodeling the existing structure. Van Zomeren stated the Applicant has discussed the height of the proposed structure with Staff which requires a variance to the height requirement. Boynton staled the proposed structure Is 30 feet higher than the road without the ten feet credit for the elevation of the street. Lindquist staled he does not have a problem with the height of the structure, but noted the proposed structure should comply with the structural coverage limit. Boynton stated they are attempting to utilize the same building pad because a neighbor had expressed concerns about the house being located further back. Chair Smith inquired whether there were any public comments concerning this application. Boynton commented they are attempting to comply with the requirements as much as possible. Chair Smith stated some variances will be needed, noting the structure could be constructed to lessen some of the variances. Tom Mortenson, 1971 Fagemess Point Road, slated he has spoken with Mr. Boynton about the proposed structure. Mortenson commented he has a problem with the height of the structure, noting the Applicant Is proposing to construct a 40 foot wall six feet from the lot line which will block his view considerably. Page 3 L ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION . MONDAY, OCTOBER 19,1998 (^2410 Peter Boynton, continued) Van Zomeren stated the elevation height at the peak of the house is 985 teet. Boynton remarked if the house is built further back, it will require more excavation. Chair Smith commented if the structure is moved back, it will eliminate some of the variances for the setbacks. Mortenson staled if the house is moved further back, he will not have a problem with the height of the structure. Kathy Lee. neighbor, stated she Is not opposed to moving the stmcture further back. Van Zomeren commented she was unsure whether the present garage foundation was adequate to build on. Boynton stated he is agreeable to moving the structure back. Hawn stated she would not be in favor of granting a variance to the structural coverage. Lindquist commented the height and structural coverage of the building need to be addressed further. Stoddard stated he was in agreement that the structural coverage and height of the building should be addre^ed. Chair Smith recommended tabling the application to allow the Applicant time to submit revised plans. Schroeder stated structural coverage should be limited to the allowable limit. Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to table Application #2410,1973 Fagerness Point Road, to allow the Applicant time to submit revised plans. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Hawn thanked the adjoining property owners for attending tonight's meeting and giving their input on this application. SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS: SUBDIVISIONS (#8) #2425 REBERS CONSTRUCTION, 2190 WEST WAYZATA BOULEVARD • SUBDIVISION RENEWAL. 7:17 p.m. - 7:40 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Sidney Rebers was present. Gaffron stated this application is for renewal of approval granted in 1997 for the conversion of Outlol E, Sugar Woods, be converted to buildable lot status to enable commercial development of the property. This property was originally plaited and approved In 1989, which allowed the Rebers to postpone dedication of a specific service road corridor through Outlot F until Outlol F was further Page 4 , t III ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 16,1998 5 (IH2399 Muriel Senn, continued) Smith suggested the application be tabled to allow the Applicant time to submit a revised plan. McMillan noted that most of the residence lies within the 73*250' setback and hardcover can only be reduced by a slight amount. McMillan stated the overall structural coverage is more important In her opinion. Van Zomeren stated the Applicant needs to stay 10 feet from the lot line. Stoddard inquired whether the Applicant had considered building up on the existing residence. Senn stated she would like to have a larger garage. Senn remarked she has had the architect look at this proposal three different times, the surveyor twice, and they were of the opinion that this new plan was feasible for this property. Chair Smith indicated that the Planning Commission has tried to provide further direction for the Applicant. Schroeder stated the Planning Commission could vote on this application tonight so it could proceed on to the City Council who would then make the final decision. Senn stated she would like the application to move forward without Jeopardizing her application. Senn indicated she would like the application to go to the City Council. Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to deny Application #2399,4448 North Shore Drive, as submitted, based upon the existing excessive hardcover in the 76'>250* setback as well as the proposed increase to the structural coverage above 15 percent. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#4) #2410 PETER BOYNTON, 1973 EAGERNESS POINT ROAD, VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 8:07 p.m. - 8:09 p.m. Peter Boynton was not present. Chair Smith recommended this application be tabled. Van Zomeren stated the requested information has not been submitted, and a letter has been sent to the Applicant requesting that he waive the 60/120 day review period. There were no public cornments. Hawn moved, McMillan seconded, to table Application #2410,1973 Eagerness Point Road, to allow the Applicant time to submit the required information, and to waive the 60/120 day . review period. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#5) #2411 PAUL HANSSEN, 3195 CASCO CIRCLE. VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 8:09 p.m. • 8:28 p.m. Paul Hanssen was present. Page 8 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 ROLL: The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chair Sandra Smith, William Stoddard. Daie Lindquist. Llli McMillan, and Charles Schroeder. The following represented the City Staff: City Planner/Zoning Administrator Elizabeth Van Zomeren, Assistant Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, and Recorder Lanette Wolf. Chair Smith called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. (#1) #2410 PETER BOYNTON, 1973 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD, VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 6:30 p.m. - 6:47 p.m. The applicants were not present. Joe Dzurik, builder for the applicants, was present Van Zomeren stated this application came before the Planning Commission on August 17,1998, October 19,1998, and November 16,1998. She reviewed the site plan and stated that the applicant proposes to excavate and remove a total of 344 cubic yards from the property. Since this excavation is proposed within the 75 ’ lakeshore setback. It requires a conditional use permit. The application also needs a lot area variance because It Is new construction. It would also need a lot width variance because the lot Is less than 100’ wide at the setback. A structural coverage variance would be required because the proposal Is 17.6% where 15% Is the allowed structural coverage. Hardcover in the 75 ’ lakeshore setback is currently at 21.5%. The proposal would bring the hardcover down to 18.6% which still exceeds the requirement, which Is zero. Van Zomeren said that It Is recognized that no hardcover In the 75 ’ lakeshore setback would be difficult on this lot. She said that In the 75 ’-250 ’ setback, there Is currently 32.9% hardcover, 34.1% hardcover Is proposed and 25% Is allowed. Hardcover variances are requested in both of the setbacks from the lake. Another variance Is needed for the average lakesnore setback. The sldeyard setbacks can oe met. The proposed garage encroaches 3 feet Into the required 30 ’ setback from the street and requires a variance from the street yard setback. Van Zomeren explained that the Zoning Code requires that the height for this proposed residence be measured from the garage level which Is proposed at 934. The allowed height from the garage side to the midpoint of the roof is the 974 elevation. Van Zomeren stated that staff does not find that there is a hardship for the average lakeshore setback or the structural coverage and recommends denial of the requested variances. Smith asked for clarification of the difference between the previous proposal and the current proposal. Van Zomeren showed the difference In the plans. Van Zomeren stated that h Is not typical City policy to allow land alteration In the 0’-75 ’ setback. Joe Dzurik. builder for the applicants, stated he feels that staffs interpretation of the elevation is Incoiiect. Stoddard reviewed comments made at the previous Planning Commission meetings. The • Commission members had stated they would like to see a footprint for the house that dkJ not call for variances and the applicant should try to limit the house to 1,500 square feet and 25% total hardcover. Stoddard said he could approve variances for the lot area, lot width, lakeshore setback and street yard setback, but he could not approve the variances for structural coverage, average lakcohore setback or height. Lindquist said he feels (he project will have to be redesigned due to the site constraints. Joe Dzurik asked if the height variance would be approved. Van Zomeren said it is a design issue. Pagel ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 (m) #24i0 PETER BOYNTON, 1973 EAGERNESS POINT ROAD - Continued McMillan stated that the staff recommendation Is helpful. Dzurik stated he did not receive a copy of the staff report. Smith asked if Dzurik was prepared to represent the applicant tonight. Dzurik said yes. Smith stated that this application was tabled In November because the applicant was not present at the meeting. Lindquist stated that staff finds no hardship for an average lakeshore setback, street setback, structural coverage, hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback, or height variances. He believes that the project will have to be redesigned to fit the site. McMillan said that staff finds hardship for the lot area, lot width and lakeshore setback variances because of the size of the lot. She said staff does not see hardship in the average lakeshore setback and she agrees with staff. She feels the house could be positioned so it does not Interfere with the neighbors’ sight line. She asked staff about the setback from the street. Van Zomeren said that the setback requirement is 30 feet Van Zomeren feels it could possibly be reduced. McMillan agreed. She said she would not approve a structural coverage variance or a hardcover variance. Smith said there has been clear direction from the Planning Commission on this application. Van Zomeren stated she is concerned because she has not had any contact with the applicants regarding this application. Lindquist stated that the applicants must be at the meeting the ne)d time the application is on the agenda. The applicant should understand that the Commis^on will probably follow staffs recommendations. There were no public comments. Van Zomeren stated she knows the notices for the meeting were mailed because ^e received a cali from a concerned neighbor. Lindquist asked Dzurik if he would prefer that the Commission members vote on the application as submitted or table the matter. Dzurik stated he would like it to be tabled. Lindquist moved, McMiiian seconded a motion to tabie #2410, Peter Boynton. 1973 Fagemess Point Road, Variances and Conditional Use Permit VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Schroeder arrived at the meeting at 6:48 p.m. Page 2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AUG 0 9 1999 , • sir/nc^AfO 1I DATE; 8/4/99 ITEM NO Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2474 C. Steven and Susan Wilson 325 South Brown Road and 2150 Abingdon Way Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement—Public Hearing Exhibits A B C D Draft Resolution Property Survey Resolution No. 4313 approving lot line rearrangement Subdivision Staff Reports Summary of Request The City Council recently approved a Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement for C. Steven and Susan Wilson for properties located at 325 South Brown Road and 2150 Abingdon Way. The applicants own both properties involved. They reside at the 325 South Brown Road property, the Abingdon Way lot is vacant. Subdivision Code requires applicants dedicate drainage and utility easements along all newly created property lines. Easements have been granted by the applicants along the new property line. However the underlying drainage and utility easement along the old property line was not vacated at the time the subdivision was approved. The new property line will provide for any future utilities required. The existing drainage and utility easement should be vacated. Typically the old easements are vacated as part of the subdivision. Request to release east 60 feet of Lot 5, Block Abingdon Glen from the Private Road Maintenance Agreement for the private road Abingdon Glen Abingdon Glen is subject to a Declaration of Private Road Easement and Declaration of Covenants for Maintenance among the property owners. Applicants have requested the east 60 feet of Lot 5, which will become part of 325 Brown Road South property be released from the Private Road Easement. The covenants and easement documents within the Abingdon Homeowner’s Association require consent of the City of Orono. • J The Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend approval to vacate the drainage and utility easement underlying the previous lot line. Staffs recommends approval of the request to vacate the iO' wide drainage and utility easement along the previously existing property line between 325 South Brown Road and 2150 Abingdon Way based on the fact the easement is no longer necessary as a new drainage and utility easement has been granted along the new property line. A RESOLUTION VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN THE PLAT OF ABINGDON GLEN AND . IN THE CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FILE NO. 2474 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation orgamzed and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and wffFRF AS on March 12 1999, C. Steven Wilson and Susan D. Wilson (hereinafter Resolution No. 4313; and WHEREAS, the ten foot drainage and utility easement extstmg ^ property line was not vacated at the time of subdivision, and applicants have granted to the City OroTO I underlying drainage and utility easement along tlie new property Ime. and WHVRF AS after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held by the Orono Planninr^tmission on July 19,1999, regarding said vacation and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, properties in Abingdon Glen are subject to a Declaration of Priva Road Easement and Declaration of Covenants for Maintenance; and WHEREAS, the east 60 feet of Lot 5, Block 1, Abingdon Glen has been legally combined with property located at 325 Brown Road South; and Page 1 of2 WHEREAS, on July 19, 1999 after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the proposed vacation, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation of drainage and utility easement legally described as follows: That part of the 10.00 foot drainage and utility easement that lies westerly of, measured at right angles to and parallel with the east line of Lot 5, Block 1, ABINGDON GLEN, Hennepin Coimty Minnesota according to the record plat thereof that lies southerly of the north line of the south 900.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The drainage and utility easement vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in consideration of the following findings: 1. The vacated easement has not been utilized for utilities. 2. A new drainage and utility easement has been dedicated along the newly created property line. 3. The City does not intend to use the easement to be vacated for any public purpose 4. Utility companies have been notified of the proposed vacation and none have indicated an objection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the vacation of the drainage and utility easement legally described above is hereby granted by the Council of the City of Or<mo, Minnesota and the City of Orono consents to the release of east 60 feet of Lot 5, Block 1, Abingdon Glen from Declaration of Private Road Easement and Declaration of Covenants for Maintenance at a regular meeting held on August 9,1999. I I !ii ll !! i!i i! lii I I I { I II * CD CO H- O (D +J CO O •H M- •H +J I i I ! I { la i!|sit 11 I i 8 81812 i{ *' »K in*81 II !yi I 1II !j h !> 1 I ii't! iitg -r-. f ^/l »W *1# /• >/< IS *m __ :i >«1T 2i' cb O 8;i' i\i 9W.•ON •WVS'D MTV MMOm¥ *t VMV 18 l»T /••W 3 t f/i aw ^ >/i { «9 I < 5 09tr< I) •f I JiI k«/>or>»<iaw i«v./^vyi8iiC V 5 I o> co CO e CO CO :3 C0| 1^ § III ■: ■< ap 3: c51 S 3 ili^sN' V ^ 5? ^ wjO iiS ?lO 1?I Mf Moi S' • o • tt O.K CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ij o “NO. 4 O ______ . A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 325 BROWN ROAD SOUTH AND 2150 ABINGDON WAY FILE NO. 2474 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota: and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter ”City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the Cit>' Council has considered the application for a Class I subdivision of a lot line rearrangement by C. Steven V^son and Susan D. Wilson (hereinafter the applicants ) involving properties legally described as follows: Lot 5, Block 1, Abingdon Glen, Hennepin County, Minnesota and The south 900.00 feet of the east 700.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota; Qiereinafter "the property"); and * • . • WHEREAS, the applicants have completed all requirements of toe City for a Class I subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for division and combination purposes, in order to separate the easterly 60 feet of Lot 5, Block 1, Abingdon Glen from said Lot 5 for combination with the aforesaid south 900.00 feet of the east 700.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3; and Page 1 of 3 CITYof ORONO AHH'. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL>1 o oNO. _±±Li_£_:__ WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed division will result in lots which remain conforming to the lot standards of the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the Class I subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for the applicants as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Edward J. Otto of Otto Associates Engineers and L^d Surveyors, Inc. dated March 2, 1999 and attached to this resolution, subject to the following conditions: 1.Upon the approval of this division by the City Council, the applicants shall legally combine the east 60 feet of Lot 5, Block 1, Abingdon Glen with the south 900.00 feet of the east 700.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 117, Range 23. 2.The applicants shall grant to the City a 10' drainage and utility easement along the west side of the new dividing line within Lot 5, Block 1, Abingdon Glen, such easement to be executed prior to release of this subdivision for filing by the City Attorney. 3.Applicants shall provide confraiation of legal ownership of the property via title opinion or other form satisfactory to the City Attorney before the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement will be released for filing. 4.The aforesaid division shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be ffled by the City of Orono with either the Heimepin County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before December 28,1999 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. 5.The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Page 2 of 3 t i f j> ; CITYof ORONO ■M RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL *ffl Q r •' NO.cO A ATTEST: I/a . ■■ ■■ r'"' *" Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabri^Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) )ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 28th day of June, 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Piilblic I & MARY ANN JOHNSON N0URVPUBUC4INNeS0U lly Comiisian Beta Jn SI, ____[V Page 3 of 3 ... .. ..%#»/ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: June 24,1999 Item No.: Department Approval:Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2474 - C. Steven & Susan Wilson , 325 Brown Rd. S./2150 Abingdon Way Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Certificate of Survey C - Planning Commission Minutes 4-19-99 D - Standard Drainage & Utility Easement E - Staff Memo and Exhibits of 4-9-99 Applicants own both properties involved in this lot line rearrangement. The Abingdon Way lot is the last vacant lot in Abingdon Glen, and is about 5 acres, half of which is wetland protected under an existing Flowage and Conservation Easement. Applicants' residence is on Brown Road South. The two parcels are separated by Long Lake Creek. Applicants' goal is to gain access to the Luce Line from their residence lot by creating a corridor from the easterly 60' of the Abingdon Way lot; a second goal is to protect a row of trees along the east line of the Abingdon Way lot. The critical conditions identified by staff and Planning Commission as necessary for approval include: 1. Confirmation that the Abingdon Way lot ends up with at least 2.0 acres of contiguous dry buildable land per the RR-IB Zoning District standards. 2. Confirmation that the Abingdon Way lot will retain its two tested drainfield sites meeting the required setbacks from the new lot line. 3. Confirmation that the Abingdon Way lot will still have a viable building site. 4. Creation of a new drainage and utility easement along the new lot line. Planning Commission Recommendation On April 19 Planning Commision voted 6-0 to recommend approval subject to the 4 above conditions, finding no variances would be required and each lot would be conforming after the proposed lot line rearrangement is completed. Staff Recommendation Applicants' surveyor has confirmed that the Abingdon Way lot will meet the 2.0 acre minimum dry •t #2474 - Wilson June 24,1999 Page 2 buildable standard, with the new lot line being 60.00 feet west of the existing lot line. A review of the original septic testing information provided when Abingdon Glen was platted, indicates the septic sites will still meet the required 20’ lot line setback. The potential buildable envelope for this lot will be slightly smaller than before the lot line rearrangement, but will still provide for two potential house sites. Staff reconunends q)proval of the lot line rearrangement subject to applicants granting the required 10' drainage and utility easement adjacent to the new lot line. The old 10’ easement will remain in place (no vacation was requested). COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt or amend the attached resolution granting final approval for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for C. Steven and Susan Wilson at 325 Brown Road South/2150 Abingdon Way. ^ ' r ! N S3s ^ • iui ■li? nil’' mi lipill tAzis IJsl \ i V o % O- •t! . . o ** o =: *^ a -X 2 2 <b <t I a. P H O ?•S g >'■ J! I 01 ^ ^ O 3C ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 19,1999(#247rGeorge Stickney, continued) Stickney cemented that it was their goal with this subdivision to preserve tha/natural features of the property as mi^h as possible, noting that they wiil require a covenant that any trees removed as part pf the development wili need to be replaced. • / .. Hawn Inquired whwl\er there were any public comments regarding thls^piication. Pal Dougherty, Old Ci^al Bay Road, stated he has no particular difficulties with this proposed subdivision, but expresses concern over the amount of land dej^loped to the north and the Increased water runoff pr^^ms they have been experiencing^ce that time. Dougherty requested that that issue be addressed!^ Stickney commented that he w^ld be willing to review th^rainage to see If steps could be taken to correct the problem. Weinberger stated City Staff would llk^o see mor^ater runoff to the drainage pond. Stickney remarked that there will not be aVorse^used on Lot 2 due to a covenant that will be in effect with this subdivision. \y Lindquist commented that the Applicant should be aware that City Staff Is recommending a ten foot easement In addition to the park dedication fee fo^is subdivision. Hawn noted that the City Is not In pos^ssion of the s^ic reports for this subdivision. .M • Stickney stated that the septic inso^or has been out to uje property and has not found any major Issues involving the septic. Stlcl^ey remarked that It was h|s underetandlng that the reports had been submitted to the City andiras not sure why the City do^not have them at this time. Hawn inquired how frequently variances are given to lots that do^pot meet the 200 fool setback at the street. / Weinberger staled thatyariances to street width are typically grantecSon a cul-de-sac due to the fact that If the lots we^ required to meet the 200 foot Mreet width, thabUie lots would not function well with the other lots and would have an unusual configuration. Stoddard Inqulre^hether this was a subdivision or preliminary plat appro^l, Stickney stat^it was a preliminary plat application. Stoddard inoved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2477, 250 and no Old Crystal Bay Road South, Class III Preliminary Plat Subdivision to pemvit variances to the 200 foot street width for Lots 3,4, and 5, subject to xm condi^ns outlined In the April 19,1999 Planner’s Report and the April 5,1999 CfW Eng^eer*s report, and further subject to the incorporation of any recommendations by theONR and Hennepin County regarding the drainage into the final plat application. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 6. #2474 SUSAN WILSON, 325 BROWN ROAD SOUTH/2510 ABINGDON WAY, LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT Page 5 (#2474 Susan Wilson, continued) The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Steven and Susan Wilson, Applicants, were present.. Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting a lot line rearrangement to^ange the lot line ‘ 60 feel to the west to have the trees located along the east property line on the 325 South Brovwi Road property, which would allow that lot to have platted access to the Luce Line Trail. The property located at 2150 Abingdon Way will continue to have two salable septic sites that can meet the 20 fool setback requirement from the east property line. The rearranged lot line vnll not make either lot non-conforming for lot area or setbacks or change the existing building pads. City Staff recommends approval of this application subject to the prpperty o^ne^ Providing ^ 10 foot drainage easement along the new east property line for 2150 Abingdon Way as well as the other conditions outlined In the April 19,1999 Planner's Report. Mrs. Wilson commented that the land might be sold and they wanted to Insure that the trees in that area will not be cut down. Smith noted that this was an unusual situation, but questioned whether the City would be running the risk of having other property owners construct alleys to other desirable locations. but noted this lot line rearrangement Is really not creating a flag lot. There were no public comments. Lindquist commented he does not have a problem with this application. Schroeder inquired whether any variances were necessary with this application, Weinberger stated it was simply a lot line rearrangement and would not require any variances. Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2474,325 Brown Road South/2610 Abingdon Way, Lot Line Rearrangement, with the 'JJ* f new 10 foot drainage easement along the new east property line for 2150 Abingdon Way will be required. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Mr. Wilson Inquired whether they would be able to be put on the May 10th City Council agenda, Weinberger stated they would need to submit the existing and proposed legal dwcriptions, along with the new easements shown on the survey, by the end of next week Wednesday. Mr. WIson requested that this Item be set on the May 24th City Council agenda, I 7. #2479 Peter Andrea Corft] ny, 655 Stubbs Bay Ro^dfCl^s III Subdivision, 7:41 p.m.-8:19 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and ^davifbf P Mark Gronberg, ArchkeetT^s present Page? DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this day of ^ 19_, by and between hereinafter referred to as "Grantor(s)'', and the City of Orono, a municipal corporation, its employees, interests and assigns, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee”. WITNESS, THAT Grantor(s), in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration given by Grantee, the receipt of which is acknowledged by Grantor(s), do(es) hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement for drainage and utility purposes, including the right to construct and maintain the same, together with the right of the public for access over, above, under and across the land located in the State of Mirmesota, County of Hennepin, legally described as follows: The east 10 feet of the following described property: That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Abingdon Glen, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Heimepin County, Minnesota that lies west of the east 60.00 feet thereof. In addition to any other remedy the Grantee may have, the covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. Grantor(s) covenant that they are in fee title to the above property, have a lawful right and authority to convey and grant this easement, and that the land is free from all encumbrances except: Grantor(s) have executed this document the day and year set forth above. GRANTOR(S) Page 1 of 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this _____________19 _____, by_______________ day of NOTARY PUBLIC State Deed Tax Due Hereon: This instrument was drafted by: City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Page 2 of 2 N '1 is K V V- . V TO;FROM:DATE:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City AdministratorStaffApril 9,1999 SUBJECT; #2474 Steven and Susan Wilson 325 South Brown Road and 2150 Abingdon Way Lot Line Rearrangement--Public Hearing Tuning Dbtnct: Lot Area: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Lots 325 South Brown Road 2150 Abingdon Way Existing 14.46 acres 4.98 acres total 2.25 acres wet 2.73 acres dry 2.55 acres dry contiguous Proposed 15.32 acres 4.19 acres 2.02 acres wet 2.17 acres dry Exhibits: A Application B Plat map C Property Owner's list D Topo Map E Plat of Abingdon Glen F Proposed Lot Line Rearrangement G Consent Form The applicant owns bom lots and would Uke to change the lot «ne 60'to mr^^Tiutve me Zs mLed along me east property line on me 325 Soum Brown ^ property, this lot line wiU allow the Soum Brown Road lot to have platted access to the Luce Line Trail. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (B) RR-IB Standards & Chapter 11 (Subdivision Ordinance)I ANALYSIST nt Area and YardsRR-IBLot Area 2 acres District StandardsLot Width 200 ’ Front Yard 50* Rear Yard 50 ’ Side Yard 30 ’ Subject Property Lot Area and Yards The rearranged lot line will not make either lot non-conforming for lot area or setbacks. The smaller lot, 2150 Abingdon Way, will continue to have two suitable septic sites that can meet the 20’ setback requirement from the east property line. STAFF RECOMMENDATION To approve the lot line rearrangement, subject to the property owner providing the following information for filing with Hennepin County: 1. A new 10’ drainage easement along the new east property line for 2150 Abingdon Way 2. 3. 4. A consent form for both properties if a mortgage is held on either property A certificate of survey showing the new drainage easement with a signature block with the property owner's signature It would also be helpful if the surveyor would put thie following information on the certificate of survey for filing: total lot area total dry acres total wet acres total dry contiguous areas 5. A reduced copy at 1 ”=200’ for amending the City’s section maps #2474 Steve and Susan Wilson 2150 Abingdon Wc^/325 South Brown Road Lot Line Rearrangement PC-April 19. 1999 page-2 Application if Date Received^0^n^233 Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION IU)A1 /r O 11 —7 ^ue aaoress ---------—^----------7- Property Identification Number (PID) 03'“ 7~~ 33___ Please check one - Property____abstract or torrens? I . * lication.^^^^^ /S/y^ I, A^WGMAJ CLB/U APPLICANT / X / I-/ Name ^ —v* yLi//S^*^y^------——----- Address S . Phone (home) City /u./e.r /ii^i. Zipi£3^Phone (work) 3fc?~^y OWNER (if different than applicant) Name_______________ dfeis abiKicr Address City (attach list if more than one) Zip Phone (home) Phone (work) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units___I. Other (specify)_________ Present Zoning District a j r® X PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) _________ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites / Existing Units O New Units Total Units ( f n J}p-l -V. 5 r'-r-. V> fl ”'0 1 Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per___Acres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify)\ MINIMUM MATERUL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Pa>inent of fees (refer to "application fees" listed below. 2. Completed application form. 3. Preliminary plat information on Certificate of Survey. 4. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350’ (you must obtain this list fi'om Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Go\l. Centet^348-327n^ 5. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Zoning Ofiicial's Signature ______________________________________ Date ________________________________ MINIMUM MATERUL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FLNAL APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (refer to Preliminary Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Sur\ ey or mylar copies of formal plat 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit Zoning Official's Signature ______________________________________ Date________________________________ Totals L APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check pC] those which apply) A. Application Base Fees: Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $250.00 X Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $350.00 _____ Subdivision Application (Class I & II) $350.00 ______ _____Preliminary Subdivision Application $375.00 + $25.(X)/lot (Class III & all non-residential) _____ Final Plat Application (Class III) $200.00 • _____ Legal Review and Filing: _____Subdivision only $75.00 ______ _____Subdivision w/easements and covenants mia $200.00 ______ _____ Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) _______ ____^ Legal and Engineering Review Fees (as incurred) _______ _____Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change from original application) ______ _____Renewal of Class III, Preliminary Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change jfrom original application) ______ _____Renewal of Final Class III Subdivision Application $150.00 (No change fix>m original application) ______ B. Special Improvement Fees: _____ Proposed Private Roads $600.00 + $.50/lineal ft;_____lia ft. x .50 = $_____ ______ _____ Proposed Public Roads $900.00 + $.50/lineal ft.;_____lin. ft. x .50 ® S______ ______ _____ Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $900.00 ______ _____ Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.00 + $25/stub ______ _____ Proposed Watennain Extension $250.00 + $25/stub ______ _____ Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) $200.00 ______ _____ On-Site System, Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $50.00/per lot x_____new lots ______ C. Flexible Application Fees/Misc. Fees _____ Variance $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) ______ ____ Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision $100.00 ______ _____ PRD Application with Subdivision $30.00/Dwelling Unit ______ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Platming Commission and Council necessan to process this application and further agrees to pay all addition^established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature _________________ Date_ Kj 19/^ Owner’s Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City Office 25 day's before the Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Comimssion and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 63^(t7' tJ- H JS^ '"' l-OT I £CO=:£D v:» IT *• y !?*?:• VAT ic\ \Tt. r.D 5-ATE •:•!^ci •i RUN DATE 05/16/99 BATCH 507 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 28 PROP A1 OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP A1 OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP AODR owner name TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 05-117-23 15 0001 00350 BROWN RD S W F FARLEY I K G FARLEY WILLIAM I KATHLEEN FARLEY 550 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0002 00300 BROWN RD S JOHN C DOUTHIT ETAL JOHN C DOUTHIT 300 S BROWN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0003 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED L0NGRID6E ASSOCIATES L0N6RIDGE ASSOCIATES 15607 MCGINTY RD W WAYZATA MN 55391 ^ 1 38 05-117-23 13 0005 01995 FOX RIDGE RD ROB HACK RAYMOND H HACK 1995 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 58 05-117-23 13 0010 01950 FOX RIDGE RD D S PHELPS i E D PHELPS DAVID S t ELLEN D PHELPS 1950 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0011 01960 FOX RIDGE RD LUCIA T MORISON LUCIA T MORISON 1960 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 21 0009 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE Of MINN STATE OF MINN (DNR) CLUCE LINE TRAILI 38 03-117-23 21 0010 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED WILLIAM F HARTFIEL JR ET AL WILLIAM F I HELEN C HARTFIEL 2225 DEVIN LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-25 21 0012 02225 DEVIN LA W F HARTFIEL 8 H C HARTFIEL WILLIAM F 8 HELEN C HARTFIEL 2225 DEVIN LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 ../•f 38 05-117-23 21 0021 00185 BROWN RD S C 8 J KROGNESS CHARLES 8 JEAN KROGNESS 185 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE MN 55356 0022 S 38 03-117-23 21 00195 BROWN RD J E 8 B A ELDER JAMES E 8 BARBARA A ELDER 195 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE MN 55556 38 03-117-23 22 0008 02250 LONGVIEW CIR N F 8 M V F TORRISON NORMAN F TORRISON 2250 LONGVIEW CIRCLE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 25 0008 02255 ABINGDON WAY F 8 C STINCHFIELD FREDERICK/CHERYL STINCHFIELD 5058 MINNEHAHA CT WAYZATA MN 55591 38 03-117-23 23 0009 02260 ABINGDON WAY M F SWIONTKOWSKI ET AL MARC F SWINOTKOWSKZ 8 BETH E SWIONTKOWSKI 2260 ABINGDON WAY LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 23 0013 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ABINGDON GLEN ASSOC ABINGDON GLEN HMNRS ASSN C/0 RESIDENT OF 2205 2360 ABINGDON WAY LONG LAKE MN 55356 •I 38 03-117-23 26 0005 00525 BROWN RD S C S 8 S D WILSON C STEVEN 8 SUSAN D WILSON 325 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE MN 55556 58 03-117-23 26 0006 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C S 8 S D WILSON C STEVEN 8 SUSAN D WILSON 325 BROWN RD S LONG L6KE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 26 0005 02205 ABINGDON WAY R B BRUCE OCR BRUCE R B BRUCE 8 C K BRUCE 2205 ABINGDON WAY LONG LAKE MN 55356 1 received MAR P 2 f Cl IY Vh OftO/VO a {■ ■ {' MM DATE AS/lA/fT ■ATCH 517 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATZON SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR SO OS-117-25 24 0064 02150 ABINGDON WAY C S « S D WILSON C STEVEN I SUSAN D WILSON 525 BROWN RO S LONG LAKE NN 55554 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR SO 05-117-25 24 0009 00245 BROWN RD S A t P KEARNEY III ET AL ADRIAN A 5 PAMELA H KEARNEY 245 BROWN RO S LONG LAKE NN 55554 . REPORT NO. PX455401 PAGE 29 SO 05-117-25 24 0007 02100 ABINGDON HAY T C DEVRIES I G H DEVIRES TIMOTHY C 0 GAYLE H DEVRIES 2100 ABINGDON WAY LONG LAKE NN 55354 50 03-117-25 24 0000 00255 BROWN RD S NAR6ARET P COST MARGARET P COST 255 BROWN RO S LONG LAKE NN 55554 TOTAL BATCH 507 00022 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AMI BELIEF. DATE. tJ S 11 ^-.2 O • i 'I r^w loh E I l£(SAl Vtaf, ahih*. oi a } and /• $6U> atatk’ pom- StS^ ©/»//. 4htr> •t» 4t eati 700 900 aeoe £’n« •ft 0U.0 ' 32X S. ^ . >i.. X Ma ^ ^ a ^ v£!Li—#<fX (P 5 In I*S i' d *? i % "i: " s {? < s »$ i« A X ’• «4 £> jSs •r ■4. rs£*J fi Si U !••> “ V •• tir ? f 2 uli { .“iSSt •T. ^ .6 •< ■ ^ - V J A. ^ m Wji*» V StS Vi 3 £« %£ VX 3 ii • C n fi j-5 'i?! V ■* &A i I? H i i .^i • h - f; ' fk V* i 4. t % - Jr- V.? ?5 ^ »• 4 ?: 1*^ _ r .*: ;•• r/i f N »•*.• ,:■ .-/. s: -'-> ••• ♦*•• 5 * • -«■»• « flO OQg iW^gi.rr.COV *. . I 4 9t^i *ow 'H'V'S‘0 JCV*«. 5? -'"ir S :l^ 9_ I Vn 5?ca I I I I i ooo:s I I I 1 I I f I -t ; *.4 f ^1 %• \ *^i r/. * : ••' .•»#. . .’*•* ;-*••. — I* TTZTIwuawr cr O! (0 ^ 1 M r’ 1 •JH i!-l3 C 1 cc• 0 WJ! I 3 i • ‘icoa 1 t t • ! At 1 1 *- >1 ^ O-^ n •Sox FROM PORHAil HAIK ET AL (MON)U.25’96 t2:ll/ST. I2:l0./N0. 57600S62S2 P CONSENT Gr The undersigned ("Mortgagee") having an interest as mortgagee in the property described in the foregoing____ ____(the ”_______")»pursuant to that certain Mortgage dated 19__, filed ' _____»19 _vath the County Rccordcr/Rcgistrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota as Document No. ___ (the "Mortsage”), hereby consents to the subordinate to the __ and further agrees that the Mortgage is subject and granted in the IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Consent to be executed elective as of_________________. 1996. Mortgagee STATE OF COUNTY OF ) ) ) ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on___ _________ • the __________________of 199.. by under the laws of . on behalf of the Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: ApplicitwiV AcedLl -h -ftflK 0^ -hliw* H a ork either Q|or5 v»t^ a opmton CidAftat^ ^ *Hu CiKi I Tha of M SViooU dlto include ^267/32126335 11/20^6 bloUL 4ia^ new ^Asginfuls, » • AppUcation Date: 3/17/99 Completion Date: 3/17/99 120 Day Deadline: Extended to 9/12/99 COUNCIL meeting AUG 0 9 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY Oh OHONO DATE: 8/5/99 ITEM NO.: 3" Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2479 Peter Andrea Co. (Jim Deanovic) "555" Stubbs Bay Road North Class III Preliminary Plat Subdivision Zoning District:RR-1 A, Single Family Rural Residential, 5 Acre minimum lot size, Unsewered Comprehensive Plan:Rural Service/Rural Residential Site Area:46.75 Acres Proposal:7 Lot Rural Residential Development (Single Family - 5 Acre) Exhibits: A B C D E F G H I J K Application Plat map Property Owner's list Reduced Survey City Engineer report Assessor's calculation for park dedication January 19,1999 minutes from sketch plan Pieinning Commission Minutes - April 19,1999 Planning Commission Minutes - May 17,1999 Septic report memo April Planning Report PARCEL INFORMATION Property Identiflcation: The subdivision includes the following parcel(s): 32-118-23-24-0007 ii ’i t r' Summary of Request Peter Andrea Co. is proposing a seven lot subdivision for property located at "555" Stubbs Bay Road North. The developer has addressed most of the issues previously discussed by the Planning Commission. Access to the seven lots would be via a private road shown on the survey as Outlot A which is proposed to intersect Stubbs Bay Road to the east. The issue of the provision of future access to lots to the west is through Outlot B. Preliminary Septic Reports have been reviewed and conditionally approved by Steve Weckman. Mr. Weckman has commented additional design work shall be completed prior to final approval. Conformity to Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Standards The proposed subdivision creates a rural residential development of 5+ acre lots served by private septic systems and individual wells. The proposed development is not included in the Met Council designated service area to allow for the provision of sanitary sewer. Municipal water is not available. Surrounding Properties Property to the north, south and west is zoned RR-1A (5 acre minimum lot size). The properties to the east, across Stubbs Bay Road are zoned RR-IB (2 acre minimum lot size). The proposed subdivision is in keeping with general character of the neighborhood. Lot Layout and Lot Standards Each lot meets or exceeds the 5.0 acre minimum lot standard for the RR-1 A district. All lots also demonstrate they do meet the required lot width at the defined front yard setback. Resulting from the topography of the site and wetlands many of the lots are irregular in size and shape, however each lot appears to demonstrate a suitable building site within the required setbacks and allow for a primary and alternate septic site. The surveyor has depicted the required setbacks on the survey most revised on 7/2/99. Lot 1, Block 1 is proposed at 9.12 acres is size. Thii 'ot is subject to a future land dedication for a Highway 12/County Road 6 interchange. Current plans indicate the total "taking" will involve just under 4 acres of land. The resulting lot would be 5.16 acres Li area, still meeting the required 5.0 acre minimum lot size. It appears the lot would allow for a buildable site within the proposed setbacks with some grading. Lots 2 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 3, Block 2 are defined as comer lots which do require a 100' side yard adjacent to street setbacks. Lot 2, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 are showing setbacks of 50’ adjacent to a street. This change shall be shown on future surveys at 100'. The lots do demonstrate suitable building sites with the increased setbacks. Outlot A is intended to be a private road held by the Homeowners Association. The Homeowners Association shall be created by the subdivider. The Association will be responsible for the maintenance of the private road. The Outlot is platted at 1,100 feet in length. The Code allows a maximum of 1,000 feet for cul-de-sacs. The road is being platted with the intent to extend the road when access is required to the west. Thus, the cul-de-sac could be considered temporary. The future extension of the cul-de-sac is shown as Outlot B. Outlot B is platted providing future access to properties located to the west of the development. The Orono Subdivision Code requires property ^ing subdivided to provide for future access when determined necessary. The subdivider will only develop the road as a cul-de-sac within Outlot A. Lot 1, Block 1 will have access via a private drive through Outlot B and Outlot C. Outlot C may not be required to be platted separately, but shall have an easement dedicated to the City as a future road easement. LOT INFORMATION The subdivision is proposed as 7 lots on 46.75 acres. Block 1 Dry Acres Total Acres Lot 1 9.12 acres 9.12 acres Lot 2 5.00 acres 5.00 (non-Orono wetland) Lot 3 5.00 acres south of right-of- way 5.00 (non-Orono wetland) Lot 4 5.01 acres 5.20 acres Block 2 Loti 5.00 acres 5.38 acres Lot 2 5.08 acres 6.58 acres Lot 3 5.00 acres 7.32 acres The City Engineer shall review geotechnical recommendations and street design, including horizontal and vertical curve standards. This information shall be required before the City Council's review. Easements 1.A 27 road easement (Outlet C) is located along the west property line of proposed Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Outlot C will not developed as a street until the time access to the west becomes necessary. Outlot C will provide driveway access to Lot 1, Block 1. The driveway shall be located 5* from either property line. 2.Standard drainage and utility easements along the property lines will be required for the final plat. 3.Subdivider shall grant Conservation and Flowage easements across the wetlands located within the development. Language in the easement documents shall restrict land alteration and removal of vegetation. Park Dedication Fee Seven (7) new residential lots x $4,900 = $34,300. Drainage The City Engineer has stated in the attached Engineer's Report the draft version of the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shows that the site lies within two major drainage districts. The northerly and southerly portions of the site flow to the west and lie within the Painters Creek drainage district. Engineer's recommendation is final plans should include water quality provisions for storm water leaving the northerly and southerly portions of the site. A drainage area map, storm sewer and ponding calculations should be provided with the final plans. Issues for discussion 1.The proposed access to Lot 1, Block 1 is via Outlot B and an easement platted 27. In the future it may become necessary to develop a road for future access to the west. 2.The City Engineer has indicated this property is located within 3 separate drainage districts. The plan only indicates one stormwater pond. Is more ponding necessary? 3. Park dedication fee shall be equivalent of 8% of the value of the lot. 4. Is the proposed lot layout acceptable? uA f STAFF RECOMMENDATION All the lots meet the zoning district requirements for developments in the'RR-lA zoning district. Staff is recommending approval of the application based on the conditions noted in the attached draft resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote to: Approve the preliminary plat based on all lots meet the zoning district requirements for residential developments in the RR-1A zoning district. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the enclosed resolution. i h*/ - rf ) * L t/m r r i 'i.r=,. » ^ I- City of Own 2750 Kell^ Parkway P.O. Box 66 Cjystal Bay, MN 55323 (612) 249-4600 Fax:(612)249-4616 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Date: To: Fax: Re: Sender: N\<kvVc.QU\ J ^ '•/7'5'V‘/S5 7 ‘O’Tftf'f y P< ^tir C. <r__________________ YOU SHOULD RECEIVE ?PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVERSHEET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (612) 249-4600. r - I . - w r*. __r-mf* A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A CLASS III SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 555 STUBBS BAY ROAD FOR PETER ANDREA CO. FILE NO. 2479 WHEREAS, Peter Andrea Co. (hereinafter the "subdivider") on March 17,1999, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of an seven (7) lot residential plat of property legally described as: The Southeast Quarter of the Northwest (Quarter of Section 32, Township 118 North Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, except the South 260 feet of the East 310 feet thereof, also except that part of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter which lies northeasterly of the following described line; Commencing at the Northeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence south along the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of426 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence westerly, deflecting right 103 degrees 20 minutes a distnace of 560 feet; thence northerly to a point in the North line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 730.04 feet west of said Northeast comer as measured along said North line, and said line there ending. ALSO that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lying West of the East 730 feet thereof, and lying southerly of the southwesterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railway, (formerly the Grf*at Northern Railway), Section 32, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the Municipal Code of Ordinances, Chapter 10 (Zoning Code) and Chapter 11 (Subdivision), the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 19,1999, May 17, 1999 and July 19, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and Page 1 of 8 WHEREAS, on August 9,1999 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application, noting the following findings of fact: 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. The property is located within the RR-IA One Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of five acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. The entire site is approximately 46.75 acres, with 4.39 acres as designated wetland and 39.21 acres dry buildable, excluding land dedicated to right-of-way. The proposed plat consists of seven (7) residential lots each meeting or exceeding the five (5) acre minimum requirement for the zoning district. 4. All lots meet lot standards for lot width and lot area, and have demonstrated adequate building sites. Lot 1, Block 1 is will be accessed through a private drive noted on the plat as Outlot C. A temporary drive to serve Lot 1, Block 1 will be located in Outlot B until the private road is developed in Outlot B to ser\’e properties to the west. The front lot line for Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2 is the common boundary with Outlot A, the private road outlot Lot 4, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2 are located adjacent to Stubbs Bay Road. The side yard adjacent to the street for Lot 4, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2 has an established setback of 50'. These two lots shall not have any direct access to Stubbs Bay Road. Lots 2,3 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1,2 and 3, Block 2 shall be served by a private road designated on the plat as Outlot A. Lot 1, Block 1 is subject to a future land dedication for a Highway 12/County Road 6 interchange. Current plans indicate the total land dedication may involve just under 4 acres of land. The resulting lot would be 5.16 acres in area, still meeting the required 5.0 acre minimum lot size. It appears the lot would allow for a buildable site within the proposed setbacks with some grading. Page 2 of 8 I 10. 11. 12. 14. 15. Lots 2 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 3, Block 2 are defined as comer lots which do require a 100' side yard adjacent to street setbacks. Lot 2, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 are showing setbacks of 50' adjacent to a street. This change shall be shown on future surveys at 100’. The lots do demonstrate suitable building sites with the increased setbacks. The proposed private road to be constructed in Outlot A is 1100' in length. This length exceeds the 1000' allowed for roads ending in a cul-de-sac. A variance is granted allowing the road to exceed the 1000' allowed by code based on the cul-de- sac being developed as a temporary road. It is the intent to extend the private road when access is required to the west. The platted Outlot A cul-de-sac (100') and road (50') meet established standards for width in the Subdivision Ordinance. Private residential streets serving seven units are required minimum paved width of 28 ’ and the cul-de-sac is to be paved with a 40' radius. Construction standards are established in the Subdivision Ordinance in Section 11.33, Subdivision 4. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along all right-of-ways and along all perimeter lot lines. 13. The proposed location of the intersection with Stubbs Bay Road has been approved by the Director of Public Services. Two septic sites have been identified on each lot. The soil testing and plans completed by Swendlund Septic Services has been reviewed by Staff and conditionally approved, subject to applicant providing some additional information as specified in the Septic Review report dated August 4,1999. A stormwater management NURP pond is proposed to be located on Lot 4, Block 1. The area containing the pond shall not be included in the dry buildable area for the lot. The final plat should designate the pond as a drainage easement and adjust the lot area if necessary to accommodate the NURP pond. 16. A Orono wetlands are located over Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2. A Flowage and Conservation Easement is necessary to protect the wetlands from future development and to preserve existing vegetation. Page 3 of 8 i 4 17. The City Engineer has recommended the establishment of vegetated buffer strips on each lot to provide additional runoff filtration, since not all runoff from development of the site will be treated by the stormwater pond. 18. The Planning Commission reviewed the application on July 19, 1999 and recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0 to approve the seven lot subdivision of land located at 555 Stubbs Bay Road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for Peter Andrea Co. located at 555 Stubbs Bay Road, legally described above per preliminary plat drawings by Mark S. Gronberg, a licensed surveyor of Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. dated May 13, 1999, revised July 2, 1999 subject to the following conditions: 1.A variance will be granted for the cul-de-sac to permit a temporary cul-de-sac 1,100 feet in length where 1,000 feet is allowed. 2. Lots 2,3 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1,2 and 3, Block 2 shall access to the private road in Outlot A. No direct access to Stubbs Bay Road shall be allowed for any Lot. 3. 4. 5. 6. The private road in Outlot A shall be constructed to City private road requirements, subject to a Developers Agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Private road construction can begin as soon as the engineering plans for the road as well as stormwater management plans have been approved by the City and the Developers Agreement has been executed. Private road access shall be firom Stubbs Bay Road subject to conditions for such access to be approved by the Director of Public Services. The private road shall be privately owned and maintained per the appropriate access easement/maintenance documents to be executed by the developer. The developer shall create a homeowners association for such ownership and maintenance. The homeowners association shall also be responsible for maintenance of all stormwater facilities sen'ing the subdivision, including the pond located over Lot 4, Block 1. No building permits will be issued until the private road is completed and all stormwater management improvements have been completed by the developer and Page 4 of 8 7. 8. 9. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. approved by the City. The developer shall grant to the City an underlying Road and Utilities Easement for Outlot A. The developer shall grant Drainage and Utility easements 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along all right-of-ways and along perimeter lot lines. The subdivider shall provide screening along Outlot A and on the east side of Stubbs Bay Road to create a visual barrior to miniinize light pollution from automobiles entering Stubbs Bay Road from Outlot A. 10. Subdivider shall plant boulevard trees along the private road per the requirements of Section 11.60, Subdivision 2. Subdivider shall dedicate on the final plat west 33' for right-of-way for Stubbs Bay Road. Subdivider shall construct stormwater management improvements to be shown on the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan to be submitted with the final plat application. A final Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan must be approved by the City Engineer prior to final plat approval. Subdivider shall grant drainage easements over all drainageways and stormwater ponds with the plat. Subdivider shall provide supportive drainage calculations and define vegetated buffer strips within each lot, such strips intended to provide additional filtration of runoff prior its leaving the site, and such strips to be maintained with grasses in an unmowed state. Subdivider is hereby advised that the City will not grant final plat approval until the MCWD has approved all grading and drainage improvements for the property. All identified primary and alternate sewage system drainfield sites within the subdivision shall be fenced prior to any land alterations, and such fencing shall remain inplace until such time that each Lot is developed. Subdivider shall develop covenants for each lot for protection of drainfield sites within each Lot. Covenants shall include protection for alternate septic sites along Page 5 of 8 4 with site plans locating both primary and alternative sites. The covenant shall alert future property owners of the need to protect identified sites. 16.Applicant shall submit additional testing on soils found to have a seasonal water table at less than one foot due to eroded topsoil. Complete designs for the primary drainfield sites on each lot must be submitted and approved prior to final plat approval. Each drainfield site must be located on the survey to assure setbacks to property lines, wetlands and the NURP pond. A berm or other protective measure shall be designed into the sites which may be affected by the 100-year flood. 17. Payment of Park Dedication Fee for seven (7) new residential lots per City Ordinance. 18. Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire one year from the date of Council preliminary plat approval. Should the subdivider fail to file a final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. 1 9. Subdivider is hereby advised any changes vrith the layout of lots and/or outlots shall require further review by the City Planning Commission and City Council. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals shall be submitted to the City two ^2) weeks prior to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting: 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to l'-200'. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines per sirrvey by Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. dated May 13,1999, revised July 2,1999. B. Designation on the plat of all drainage easements, drainage and utility easements, and wetland boundaries. Page 6 of 8 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required; A. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant shall provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C. Signed and executed Drainage Easement over all drainageways, and Conservation and Flowage Easement over all designated wetlands. D. E. F. Signed and executed Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit. Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over Outlots A, B and C. Signed and executed covenants defining responsibility for construction and maintenance for Outlot A, defining future financial obligations. G. Completed application for private road name. H. Signed and executed covenants for protection of drainfield sites, including a map defining the location of the dminfield sites. I. Vegetated buffer drainage easement including a map defining said easements. 3. FEES TO BE PAID: A. Final plat fee: $200.00. B. Legal review and filing fee: $200.00. C. Park Dedication Fee 7 new lots x $4,900 = $34,300. Page 7 of8 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 9th day of August, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) )ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of August 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 8 of 8 •t, & TO:Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator FROM:Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager DATE;August 4,1999 SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2479, Peter Andrea - Final Plat The proposed seven lot subdivision includes septic system testing and design for two drainfields on each lot. The drainfield sites meet all City and State Regulations. Each new lot has been tested by Swedlund Septic Services to confirm the presence of suitable original soils adequate for two five bedroom drainfield sites. These drainfield sites are located on slopes less than 6 percent and meet all City and State Regulations. The Plat includes the identification of many non-Orono wetlands and all drainfield sites meet the required 75 feet from all type 3 wetlands. Based on the above information, staff would recommend approval of the application. The City requires that all drainfield sites be fenced off prior to any grading or land alteration on the property. I i 51 j • • Application # Date Received 3 Amount Paid gy«g). CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address Property Identification Number (PID) SZ -//p •* Z3 ~ZV.—— Please check one - Property abstract or -------torrens? Attach legal description to application. V.* e />€r€rl c^« CT//^ ---- Address "7700 E/QUiTAdLf ^lo3 _Phone (home)------- -- City_____^ ------Zip(work) OWNER (if different than applicant) rr„fu.ai‘\ Name (fifCU / 7 Address cjATfAToieJ/J AOAc--------------------__ Phone (home) ^/jj:------ City A4Aft ^ (attach list if more than one) _ Zip Phone (work) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) </2:. 9a i Acres Dry Land ?. ^Si Acres Wet Land yst Acres Total, all parcels V Residential; no. of unit.s Present Zoning District Other (specify) PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes ^ ■ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildlmg sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites _Z-----Existing Units 5* New Umts *7 Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) ^ AC Units per Acres ■Sq. Ft: Dry Buildable Land •>< Residential Other (specify) "vi MM DATE 02/11/99 BATCH 505 PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NM1C/AOOR SO 29-110>23 S3 0000 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSXCNED BURLINCTOH NORTHERN RY BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORHATIOM SVSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 30 29-110-23 33 0009 039AO SIXTH AVE N NORTHERN STATES POWER CO NSP PROPERTY TAX DEPT NICOLLET HALL MPLS HN 55401 REPORT NO. PI435401 PACE . 13 30 29-110-23 34 0000 03740 WAYZATA BLVD W CLIFFORD L OTTEN CLIFFORD L OTTEN P 0 BOX 249 LONO LAKE HN 55356 PROP'ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB 29-110-23 34 0009 03000 WAYZATA BLVD H OTTEN MANAGEMENT OTTER HANACFMENT BOX 249 LONO LAKE HN 55356 30 32-110-23 13 0002- 00530 STUBBS BAY RD N R C TAYLOR I S SKAY-TAYLOR R C TAYLOR I S SKAY-TAYLOR 530 STUBBS BAY RO N LONO LAKE HN 55356 SO 32-110-23 13 0003 . 00400 STUBBS BAY RO H TODD H 0 DONNA H CAUSE TODD t DONNA cause 400 STUBBS BAY RD LONO LAKE HN 55356 PROP AODR OWNER NATX TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER . NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB 32-110-23 13 0004 00440 STUBBS BAY RD N FREDERIC P RIEBEL FREDERIC P RIEBEL P 0 BOX 194 LONO .LAKE HN 55356 30 32-110-23 21 0006* OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSXCNED DURLXNOTON NORTHERN RY BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY SB 32-110-23 22 0003 03025 SIXTH AVE N MICHAEL A ALEXANDER 'MICHAEL A ALEXANDER 3025 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55356 30 32-110-23 23 0009 00460 ORCHARD PARK RD ROBERT J « LORRAINE E RODEN ROBERT J 0 LORRAINE.E RODEN 460 ORCHARD PARK RD LONG LAKEHN 55356 30 32-110-23 21 0003 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIONED S A CXRSPXNSKX ETAL CLIFFORD L OTTEN P 0 BOX 249 LONG LAKE HN 55356 30 32-110-23 21 0009 00030 ADDRESS PENDING STEPHEN DAVIS TOWLE STEPHEN DAVIS TOWLE 5115 PINNACLE DR OLDSMAR FL 34677 30 32-110-23 22 0004 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIONED ROBERT T HXCKELSEH ETAL JIH WHALEN 14425 30TH AVE N PLYMOUTH HN 55446 30 32-110-23 24 0003 00405 STUBBS BAY RD N R C JOCHIHS A S J JOCHIHS ROBERT I STEPHANIE JOCHIHS 405 STl/BBS BAY RD N LONO LAKE HN • 55356 SB 32-110-23 21 0005 00605 STUBBS BAY RD N SON KROONESS STEPHEN N KROONESS 60S STUBBS BAY RO N LONG LAKE HN 55356 . 30 32-110-23 22 0002 03025 SIXTH AVE N HICHAEL A ALEXANDER HXCHAEL A ALEXANDER 3025 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55356 30 32-110-23'23 0006 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXCNED STEPHEN D TOWLE STEPHEN D TOWLE 5115 PINNACLE DR OLDSHAR FL 34677 30 32-110-23 24 0006 00585 STUBBS BAY RD N K A I D K NOLHES ET AL KEVIN A 0 DIANE K HOLHES 505 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE IM 55356 t . I o MM DATE 02/11/99 BATCH SOS PROP ADOR OWNER TAXPAYER NAHC/ADOR^ PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST SB S2-11S>23 24 0007 0S9S0 WATERTOWN RD . ORCHARD PARK FARM INC ORCHARD PARK FARM INC 5980 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAIN HN S53S9 58 ‘ 52-118>25 32 0001 03940 : WATERTOWN RD JEFFREY V HELXN JEFFREY V HELXN • 3940 WATERTOWN RD MAPLE PLAXN MM 5S359 TOTAL BATCH SOS 00024 38 32-118-23 31 0001 00385 ‘ STUBBS BAY RD N PAHEU F GREGORY PAHEU FROST GREGORY C/0 HOLLYBROOK S CO . 706 2ND AVE S R400 MPLS HN 5S402 38 32-118-23 32 0005 03050 WATERTOWN RD S N S C A HARRIS STEVEN H HARRIS 385 TURHAH RD maple PLAXN HN 55359 REPORT NO. PX4S5401 PACE 14 38 32-118-23 31 0003 . 00355 STUBBS BAY RD N T R SCHUPP S J H SCHUPP TIMOTHY.R/JEANETTE H SCHUPP 355 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 32-118-23 42 0001 00400 STUBBS BAY RD N RICHARD N STUBBS RICHARD N STUBBS 400 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE HN 55356 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.lELXEF. A DATE ^ • •riioi^ . !»^ .to^t •• « i(! i« 7-/' 11 - I • 7 ' - • ♦ . I A . r / * / » . IJ______ . • /• • • * / - ■ .* */ • I . » / ♦ / /I . . I * • I . * *: ^ ‘ •I i \\ •' ^ ;C '/ ’-1 : 900IC H-M.W.««N , / t -----'*.■ •:» • V . f S ' . I- '• wttt ^TTW ' />-^/ </• /,..^M I Vi'/ /O^''4 -^.. y •¥;—,> ■ \ '■■— KVy r ^Oy.':- J;. ■■■ / /*S3^;%:iV/ .........- :■ gl'N "»\\ii/V ’/*V/n --------i'- >*7< (vZ • »- pgfCii;r.-'-~., l) ^ ^ V * • ♦\ i 8 \I ------------ ' • f, ^ ........i" . --'h J- V \\ i\# ^ % \ ' X \. ‘ N » %* V » . * ?Ni '«#€ — \ ■■ \ 7^Vv ' > I ------ > wV»'^\\ !“n vJ“ '!: ,4' jA^ h \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ •' V—•-. ;^'p:.r=^i'\\ " n '. ^ 1 VK "••'•••1 " V i ' 1 1 !n ^-..a i \. \v -^' f" y ! a I It A A N IN > N > \vVH \ \n —___N \ r •^ ^ m ^ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ ^ — — •>I - \ \V-' \ ---------- -I- C.001 ^ •. / N.'V. --V---' krA.--A--'"-C->. T> AL - \ '^;Sr " -V»--3:h- _:ia—irtlv! ^V* - — — ^1 I V \.1 V *i fl ^4 I ill M Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects m Bonestroo, tlosene, Andertik snd Assodstet, tnc. Is sn Affirmatlvt AcUon/Squd Opportunity Employer Principals: Otto C Bonestroo. RE. • Joseph C Anderlik. RE. • Mjrvin L Sorvata. PJE. • Richard E. lUrner. fJL • Glenn R. Cook. ?JL • Robert G. Schunicht. RX. • Jerry A. Bourdoa P.E. • Robert W. Rosene. PJL and Susan M. CberOa CR.A.. Senior Consultants Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PJL • Keith A. Gordon. RX • Robert R. Rfefferle. PX • Richard W. Poster. PX • David O. Leskota. PX • Robert C Russek. AJ-A. • Mark A. Hanson. PX • Michael T, Rautmartn. PX • Ted K.Pield. PX • Kenneth P. Andersort. R£ • Mark R. Rolfs. RE. • Sidney P. Williamson. P.E.. LS. • Robert P. Kotsmith • Agnes M. Ring • Michael R Rau. PX • Allan Rick Schmidt. PX Offices: Sl Paul. Rochester. Wliimar and St. Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl WeOsIte: wwwJbonesiroo.com Aprils, 1999 ... •* .*• • ■ • ^ * . . * Elizabeth VanZomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN S5323 Re: Peter Andrea Subdivision File No. 139-2479 Dear Liz: We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed seven-lot subdivision for the Peter Andrea Company. The site is located west of Stubbs Bay Road Noth and south of TH 12 in the north half of Section 32. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1. Access: The proposed access location off from Stubbs Bay Road appears accq}table. The proposed roadway will need to have a minimum paved width of 28 feet to meet City standards for a public or private street serving 7 or more units. The proposed cul-de-sac is approximately 1100 feet long where City standard allow for a maximum cul-de-sac length of 1000 feet. The plans should be reviewed for any conflicts with the future realignment of T.H. 12. The developer should be aware that the City will reconstruct Stubbs Bay Road this summer and eliminate the at grade railroad crossing and the existing access at T.H. IZ 'fhere is a need for a future east west roadway between Stubbs Bay Road and Orchard Park Road. It makes sense at this time to make provisions for a future westerly extension of the proposed roadway serving this property. City staff should research and further review possible alignments for a future westerly roadway extension prior to preliminary plat approval. It may make sense to dedicate 33 feet of right-of-way along some or all of the west boundary of the parcel. Thirty-three feet of right-of-way currently exists west of the west property boundary. Thirty-three feet of right-of-way also exists from the southwest comer of this parcel to Orchard Park Road. Final plans should include geotechnic.al recommendations and street design including horizontal and vertical curve information. 2. Grading: A grading and erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review. It appears that driveway and street construction will require some wetland filling. Driveway locatiotu. should be shown and wetland impacts identified on the final plan set. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any grading, particidarly along the wetlands. Additional erosion control will be needed during construction of the houses and septic systems. 3. Drainage: The draft version of the City ’s’ Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shows that the site lies within two major drainage districts. The northerly and southerly portions of the site flow to the west and lie within the Painters Creek drainage district. Final plans should include water quality provisions for storm water leaving the northerly and southerly portions of the site. The central portion of the site flows easterly and lies within the Lake Classen drainage district. The receiving water body for the Lake Classen portion of the site is a wetland identified as LC-C-32 in the SWMP. The wefiand is located E 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1311 • • ■f. on the east side of Stubbs Bay Road and is classified as being highly susceptible to stonn water flows. A water quality pond should be constructed on Lot 1 or Lot 7 to treat water from the site prior to discharging into weOand LC-C-32. A drainage area map, storm sewer and ponding calculations should be provided with the final plan set Final plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their review. 4. Easements: Final platting should include 33 feet of dedicated right-of-way for Stubbs Bay Road. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of -ways. Drainage easements should be provided aaoss all wetland, drainage way and pond areas. 5. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we will prepare an estimate of the total co^ for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS (#10) #2452 PETER ANDREA COMPANY, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 6XX STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH (PID #32-118-23-24-0007), 10:16 p.m. -10:40 p.m. Van Zomereh presented the staff report. She said the applicant Is proposing to subdivide a 36.47 • ' • acre.parcel Into seven lots v/ith frvo outlets for access. Each lot would contain a rninimum of 6 acres. Outlet A would be a private road ending In a cul-de-sac. She said all of the proposed building pads can meet the setback requirements. She recommended that the applicant provide additional Infonr»atIon regarding the use of the most northerly portion of the parcel and the purpose of Outlet B. Mark Gronberg and Jim Deanovlc were present. Gronbetg stated that the northern most lot line Is where Highway 12 Is proposed to run. Outlet B Is for access to the northern most lot He said there Is a platted road that runs along the west side of the property. Stoddard asked how access would be provided to the undeveloped lots to the west of the proposed subdivision. Gronberg said that the platted road that runs between the proposed subdivision and the undeveloped lots was probably intended to provide the access or they could gain access from Orchard Park Road. • Stoddard stated he Is comfortable with the plan as long as the platted road along the west side remains in the plan. Lindquist stated that he Is comfortable with the plan. McMillan said she Is also comfortable with the plan. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#11) REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETINGS ON NOVEMBER 23,1998, DECEMBER 14,1998, AND JANUARY 11,1999 Smith noted that on January 11th the Council reviewed the Rebers/Servlce 800 application and there are issues with the access. Van Zomeren stated that Mn/DOT had given preliminary approval to the access as a quick right turn, but then denied approval for that access. Mike Gaffron has been working with the project manager for that proposal and also Mn/DOT to resolve the issue. Smith r.ol’ed that there Is a published schedule of Council members who will attend the Planning Commission meetings. Smith said iliat the City has asked for an extension to provide an updated Comprehensive Plan to . the Metropolitan Council. She asked staff If the Planning Commission will be Involved in updating the Comprehensive Plan. Van Zomeren replied that Mike Gaffron will be devoting his time to completing the Comprehensive Plan. She said she Is not sure how the Planning Commission members will be Involved. Sciiroeder asked Bob Sansevere, Council Member, to what degree the Council plcns to Involve the Planning Commission In updating the Comprehensive Plan. Page 16 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 (H$) H24B1 LYLE AND GRETCHEN SHAW, 1750 SHADYWOOD ROAD • Continued Roelofs staled that the application was written as though R was for a garage. He explained the* current floor plan of the house. Stoddard asked If the desire for extra living space or the desire for garage space steered the ^ application. Roelofs said they go hand in hand. The applicants want to bring a garage to the lot and expand the house. They want to keep the house as contiguous as possible. He said the addition Is entirely behind the setback line. Roelofs reviewed the sizes of the neighboring houses. He said they would like some direction from the Planning Commission members before making further plans. Stoddard said he would like to see the hardcover scaled back. He asked what the hardcover would be if the structural coverage was brought down to 15%. McMillan said the applicants are allowed a minimum of 1,500 feel of stmclural coverage and that would automatically trigger addRional hardcover. She said that 15% structure coverage would be 1,565 square feel and the applicants are proposing 1,650 square feet She said she could approve the application if the structural coverage was reduced to 1,565 square feet. Roelofs said that would mean a reduction In building mass of 85 square feet He said they did consider maldng the garage shorter, but R doesn't reduce hardcover because the driveway would be longer. f/lcMIIlan said she believes that structural coverage Is more Important than hardcover and 1,565 iiquare feel would be very close to the allowed 1,500 square feet of structural coverage. Lindquist and SmRh agreed wRh McMillan. There were no public comments. Lindquist asked If Roelofs was comfortable with reducing the structural coverage to 15%. Roelofs said he believes they can work R out. McMillan moved, Smith seconded, a motion to approve Application #2451, Lyle and Gretchen Shaw, 1760 Shadywood Road, for a hardcover variance In the 76 ’-260* lakeshore setback with the condition that prior to the Issuance of a building permit the applicant provide a drainage plan that would be acceptable to City Staff. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 15 1 % • ORONO PLANNING COM^^SSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 19,1999 {U2A7A Susan Wilson, continued] The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Pubiication were noted. Steven and Susan Wiison, Appiicanls, were present.. Weinberger stated the Appiicanls are requesting a iot iine rearrangement to change the iot iine 60 feet to the west to have the trees located along the east property line on the 325 South Brown Road property, which would allow that lotto have platted access to the Luce Line Trail. The property located at 2150 Abingdon Way will continue to have two suitable septic sites that can meet the 20 foot setback requirement from the east property line. The rearranged lot line will not make either lot non-conforming for lot area or setbacks or change the existing building pads. City Staff recommends approval of this application subject to the property owner providing a new 10 foot drainage easement along the new east property line for 2150 Abingdon Way as well as the other conditions outlined In the April 19,1999 Planner's Report. Mrs. Wilson commented that the land might be sold and they wanted to Insure that the trees In that area will not be cut down. Sm.ith noted that this was an unusual situation, but questioned whether the City would be running the risk of having other property owners construct alleys to other desirable locations. Weinberger staled the City has seen proposals similar to this requesting walkways down to Lake Minnetonka, but this is the first application requesting a walkway to the Luce Line. Weinberger remarked that another alternative to preserving the trees would be to grant a conservation easement, but noted this lot line rearrangement Is really not creating a flag lot. There were no public comments. Lindquist commented he does not have a problem with this application. Schroeder inquired whether any variances were necessary with this application. Weinberger stated it was simply a lot line rearrangement and would not require any variances. Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2474,325 Brown Road South/2610 Abingdon Way, Lot Line Rearrangement, with the understanding that a new 10 foot drainage easement along the new east property line for 2150 Abingdon Way will be required. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Mr. Wilson Inquired whether they would be able to be put on the May 10th City Council agenda. Weinberger stated they would need to submit the existing and proposed legal descriptions, along with the new easements shown on the survey, by the end of next week Wednesday. Mr. Wilson requested that this Hem be set on the May 24th City Council agenda. 7. #2479 Peter Andrea Company, 655 Stubbs Bay Road, Class III Subdivision, 7:41 p.m.-8:19 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted, Mark Gronberg, Architect, was present. Page? ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 19,1999 (^2479 Peter Andrea Company, continued) Hawn noted that the representative for the Peter Andrea Company will not be able to attend tonight's meeting until later, and Inquired whether there was anyone In the audience that was here for this application. Several people In the audience Indicated that they would like to comment on this application. Gronberg stated that Jim Deanovic would not be able to make it until approximately 8:15 p.m. A re>ildc.nt In the audience requested that this application be held at the scheduled time and he could have the opportunity to speak when he arrives. Lindquist commented that in his view the Planning Commission should proceed with this floollcatlon. Weinberger stated the Applicant Is proposing to subdivide a 46.75 acre parcel into seven residential lots In the five .acre zoning district. The parcel is zoned RR-1A, Rural Residential District. Each of the seven lots will consist of approximately Tive acres dry buildabie. Weinberger remarked there are a number of issues that still need to be addressed before this application can be approved. The Applicant Is proposing access through a private road located off of Stubbs Bay Road ending In a cul-de-sac. City Code requires roads to be platted through in order to insure future connections to landlocked parcels, and the developer is required to pial access outlets for future road extensions to the west. However, the proposed interchange for Highway 12 and County Road 6 will make access from the north difficult if not impossible. This property also contains some wetlands which are not located In Orono. It Is City Staffs position that the wetland not be mitigated if an alternative exists for access to Lot 3. The developer will also need to incorporate a stormwater pond and conservation and drainage easements will be required over the pond. Weinberger stated the Applicant will also need to submit information on driveway access to Lot 6, a wetland delineation report, and septic reports before this application can be approved. City Staff is recommending that this application be tabled to allow the Applicant time to address the nine Issues identified on page five of the April 19,1999 Planner's Report and to give City Staff time to review the required reports. Smith Inquired why this application was being heard tonight if there were some many outstanding issues remaining to be resolved. Weinberger stated that the application was accepted by the City with notice being given to the neighbors approximately two weeks ago. City Staff was expecting submittal of this Information prior to tonight’s meeting. City Staff also had concerns that need to be addressed by the Planning Commission regarding the location of the roadways. Gronberg commented that the future roadways for this development are a concern, noting that if the land to the west Is ever developed, rezoning would be necessary, and there would be an opportunity at that time to create roads to the west. Schroeder commented that in his opinion he cannot contemplate rezoning to two acres at this time for that area. Past 8 4^ 1 )I ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 19,1999 (S2479 Peter Andrea Company, continued) Gronberg noted that there Is 33 feet of right-of-way along Orchard Park Road. * • * * • ' * • • . Weinberger stated the right-of-way had previously been dedicated from properties and City Staff is looking for right-of-way dedication for this subdivision to Insure future road connections. Schroeder Inquired what the Applicant has platted for the roadways. Weinberger stated there Is a 33 foot wide corridor along some of the properties, with a 50 foot right-of-way is needed in this area. Weinberger commented that It would be fair to both developers to have 25 feet of right-of-way on either side of the platted road. Weinberger noted that no development Is being planned at this time to the land to the west. Hawn Inquired whether there were any public comments regarding this application. Jim Whelan. 14425 - 38th Avenue, Plymouth, stated he also owns property near this subdivision, and expressed concerns that the proposed corridor for Highway 12 will landlock his property. Whelan commented he is interested in access off Stubbs Bay Road or somewhere else if possible. Whelan stated access from the south is not possible due to the low land located there. Waylon commented he has written a letter to MnDot regarding his access. Kevin Holmes, 585 Stubbs Bay, commented that he was glad to see the Planning Commission make provisions for wetlands and roads h new developments, but would like to see some information regarding the easements. Holmes stated in hls view Outlet B will not be buildable due to the Highway 12 corridor. Hawn remarked that It Is difficult to answer most of these questio.is at this time due to the lack of Information that has been provided by the developer. Hawn stated these Issues will have to be addressed at a future Planning Commission meeting and that the residents will be notified of that hearing. Donna Cause, 480 Stubbs Bay Road North, expressed concerns regarding driveway access and the need to preserve some trees in that area which act as a windbreak. Cause commented she would also like to see the drainage problems adequately addressed for this area. Weinberger stated the developer will need to submit a drainage and grading plan that Is acceptable to City Staff, which will be reviewed by the Planning Commission at the time the preliminary plat is approved. Gronberg stated they would be willing to work with the neighbors regarding some of these Issues. Gronberg noted that some of the work regartlng this development has been delayed due to the weather. Hawn Inquired whether the representative for the Applicant would be agreeable to tabling titls application in accordance with Staffs recommendation. Gronberg Indicated he would agree to tabling this Item, but would like some direction on how the roads should be platted. Lindquist slated in his view the property on the northern part will need a right-of-way or easement to access that properly from the cul-de-sac. Page 9 I £ { ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 19,1999 (#2479 Peter Andrea Company, continued) Gronberg Inquired whether he was looking at an easement for a driveway or a roadway. Lindquist commented it should be platted as a roadway.' Stoddard commented that an easement will probably need to be taken along the west side of property to prevent an 1100 foot parcel from being landlocked. Stoddard stated there may also need to be a dedicated road to the west of Outlet B. Hawn remarked that the developer may want to design this development to eliminate the backlot If possible. Weinberger stated the road will possibly end in a cul-de-sac in this area and then it would be platted through to the end of the property which would create road access to ail the tots In the subdivision. Schroeder commented that that road may be necessary to allow Waylon access to his property as well. Weinberger stated that Is one of the reasons for this road. Gronberg stated he Is willing to work with City Staff on this Issue. Hawn moved, Schroeder seconded, to table Application #2479, Peter Andrea Company, 655 Stubbs Bay Road, to allow the Applicant time to address the Issues raisedthe April 19,1999 Planner's Report and provide the necessary information. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (Recess taken from 8:20 • 8:33 p.m.) (Hawn excuses herself from the Planning Commission). 8. #2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH, CLASS II SUBDIVISION, 8:33 p.m. >8:38 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Tim Johnson. Representative for Spring Hill, was presenL Gaffron stated the Applicants are requesting approval of a preliminary plat. No new lots are being proposed with this subdivision, but as one of the conditions of approval with the Spring Hill Golf Club conditional use permit Issued in 1997 required that the golf club grant conservation and flowage easements to the City over the various wetlands and drainageways on the property. It was determined that this could be most effectively done after the wetland alterations and drainageway reroutings were completed. Gaffron stated the Applicant v4il need to contact Medina to see whether separate plat approval action is required by the Medina City Council. Gaffron stated that Hennepin County has been informed of this application, and City Staff has been Informed that Hennepin County will request an additional 10 foot right-of-way on either side of Page 10 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 I (#6) #2487 ROBERTA A. ROTH, 1251 BRIAR STREEET-VARIANCES, 6:58 p.m. -7:03 p.m, The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Roth were present. Weinberger staled the Applicants are proposing to remove an existing house and construct a new one on the existing foundation. The current foundation was replaced In 1985. This property is located in the RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential District, which has a minimum of two acres. The property Is comprised of 10,500 square feel. The Applicant applied for and received approval to construct a detached garage on the property. Variances are needed to lot area, lot width, front yard, and side yard setbacks. City Staff Is recommending approval of this application since the hardcover or overall structural coverage will not Increase. Mrs. Roth stated that the residence was not kept up and they would like to replace It with a new . structure, noting that It Is not worthwhile to make Improvements to the existing house. Hawn inquired whether the building Inspector has had an opportunity to Inspect tha foundation. Mr. Roth remarked that he has requested that Lyle and Mike from the City come out to Inspect the property but they have not done so at this time. Weinberger stated that It Is the building official ’s opinion that It will meet current codes. ... There were no public comments. Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2487, 1261 Briaf Street, to permit variances to lot area, lot width, front yard, and side yard setbacks to allow a 1,008 square foot house to be built on an existing foundation subject to the foundation being certified as to structural soundness by the City's Building inspector, and to allow the existing garage to remain on the property during the time of construction. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS (#3) #2479 PETER ANDREA COMPANY. 655 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH, CLASS HI SUBDIVISION, 7:04 p.m. -7:14 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. The Applicant was not present. Hawn noted that the Applicant was requested to submit some required Information before tonights hearing. Weinberger stated he did speak with the Applicant this afternoon regarding tonight's that the Applicant did not Indicate whether he would be present at tonight’s meeting. City Staff is recommending that this Item be tabled until next month. Hawn moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application #2479, Peter Andrea Company, Pages • \ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2469 PETER ANDREA COMPANY, CONTINUED 555 Stubbs Bay Road North, to the June 21st meeting. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Hav/n Inquired v/helher there were any ni.embers present in the audience who had wanted to speak regarding this application. S’lxto eight people indicated that they were here tonight regarding this application. Hawn commented that this application should be removed from tabling to allow the people in the audience to comment on this application. Hawn Inquired whethe*’the Applicant can be contacted to see if he would be attending tonight’s meeting. Weinberger stated he attempted to contact the Applicant prior to the meeting but was unable to reach him. Weinberger remarked that the Applicant was to have contacted him to tell hini of his plans for tonight. The Applicant indicated that he does Intend to submit revised plans. A resident in the audience commented that this was the second lime that the Applicant has not appeared. Lindquist stated that the Planning Commission does not have much choice but to table this application. Lindquist inquired whether the residents would be notified of the next hearing. Weinberger stated that the neighbors are required to receive notice of the hearings. Lindquist comrhented that the Planning Commission has no assurance that the Applicant will appear at the next hearing either, but that they will be required to reappear at the next hearing if they vrish to speak to this application. Hawn stated that the Applicant Is proposing to revise his plans, which hopefully will alleviate some of the concerns that the neighbors may have. Lindquist commented that he would like to see the neighbors involved somewhat In the planning of this subdivision, noting that ti.ere are Issues regarding access onto Stubbs Bay Road and how that will Impact the properties on the other side of the road. Hawn requested that the people who are in attendance leave their name with Mr. Weinberger. VVeinberger stated that it is the Intent to develop the street into a cul-de-sac temporarily and it is the Cit/s position that 27 feel be dedicated in the event that a road to the north is needed to serve those lots. Weinberger noted that a portion of the property will be dedicated to MnDot at the time the new Interchange is put in. Weinberger staled that City Staff is aware that one property will become landlocked once the new Highway 12 Improvements are completed. Hawn requested that her motion be reinstated to table this matter. NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS, CONTINUED (#5) #2485 ALEX AND CATHY JOHNSTON, 940 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:15 p.m. - 7:22 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Page 6 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PHONE:(612)249-4600 FAX:(612)249-4616 ZONING FILE #2479 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: May 18, 1999 TO: Jim Deanovic Peter Andrea Co. 7700 Equitable Drive #203 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 COPIES TO: Mark Gronberg Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. 482 Tamarack Avenue Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 5/17/99 VOTE:4 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The applicant has requested the application be tabled to allow additional time for septic system design and to amend the site plan. The Planning Commission has recommended the applicant contact the neighboring property owners to discuss any new proposals and access and drainage on the property. Additional information is requested, as follows: 1. Septic report for all lots. 2. Wetland delineation report. 3. Site grading and drainage plan, to include engineering and design for stormwater ponding. 4. Stormwater drainage calculations for review by the City Engineer. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the June 14, 1999 Planning Commission meeting is May 28, 1999 to submit all materials. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (249-4600). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. X:\APPS\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\CAROLE\PCACnON\2479 1 i ft • - i. -—,^.mTT7w- ^ — 4 J TO:Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator FROM:Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager DATE:June 10,1999 SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2479, Jim Deanovic - Preliminary Plat The proposed seven lot subdivision includes no septic system testing and design. Approximate drainfield sizes and site locations are identified on a topographic survey. The potential drainfield sites appear to meet City and State Regulations for slope, but more information is necessary for staff approval. The soils on some of the sites are very wet and have not been confirmed as being adequate, but it is likely that two suitable drainfield sites could be identified on each lot. Based on the above information, staff would recommend conditional approval or tabling of the application. Drainfield sites appear to be available on each property, but none of them have been tested and designed at this time. TO: Chair Smith and Oi '»no Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator i FROM:Staff RE:#2479 Peter Andrea Co. (Jim Deanovic) "555" Stubbs Bay Road North Class III Preliminary’ Plat Subdivision-Public Hearing Exhibits: A B C D E F G H I Application Plat map Property Owner's list Reduced Survey City Engineer report Assessor's calculation for park dedication January 19,1999 minutes from sketch plan Survey Septic report memo Zoning: RR*1B One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Comprehensive Plan:Rural Service/Rural Residential Application: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 46.75 acre parcel into seven (7) residential lots in the 5 acre zoning district. PARCEL INFORMATION 1^2479 Peter Andrea Co. 555 Stubbs Bay Road Subdivision PC-4/1 9/99 page-1 LOT INFORMATION The subdivision is proposed as 7 lots on 46.75 acres. Lot i Dry Acres i Total Acres 1 5.0 acres 6.36 acres 2 5.08 acres 5.08 (non-Orono wetland) 3 5.5 acres south of right-of- way 5.5 (non-Orono wetland) 4 5.19 acres 5.27 acres 5 5.50 acres 5.46 acres 6 5.0 acres 6.36 acres 7 5.0 acres 6.8 acres ZONING The parcel is zoned RR-1 A, Rural Residential District. The minimum lot area requirement is five (5) acres. The minimum setback requirements are noted below: Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Adjacent to Street 5 acres, dry buildable 300’100'100’50'100’ Wetland Setback No building, excavation, grading or filling is allowed in or within 26' of the wetlands. The wetland setback will apply to lots 5-7. »■ >4.Septic U2479 Peter Andrea Co. 555 Stubbs Bay Road Subdivision PC-4.'I9/99 page-3 The minimum setback requirements for septic systems is 75' from wetlands, water supply wells and stormwater ponds. No septic reports have been received as of the writing of this staff report. The subdivider's septic site designer has been in contact with the City's On-Site Septic Systems Manager, Steve Weckman. Staff will attach a septic report as an Exhibit to this report when it is available. The applicant has not provided septic reports to the City for review. Before we can proceed with the application Staff must determine if the septic locations as shown are acceptable. Access The proposed plat shows a private road as Ouilot A. The private road would be located off Stubbs Bay Road and end in a cul-de-sac. Our Subdivision Code requires roads to be platted through assuming it will be necessary for future connections to land locked parcels. To be consistent with the intent of the Code it is required the subdivider plat access outlots for future road extensions to the West. The proposed interchange for Highway 12 and County Road 6 will make access from the North difficult if not impossible. A wetland is located in the Northwest comer of proposed Lot 5. Staff is recommending an outlot be platted at 50' for future access to the west. The outlot would be located in Lot 5 to the south side of the wetland. Easements 1. 2. A 27' road easement is located along the west propeity line of proposed Lot 3 and part of proposed Lot 4. Standard drainage and utility easements along the property lines will be required for the final plat. 3. Subdivider shall grant Conservation and Flowage easements across Orono wetlands located over Lots 4, 5,6 and 7. Park Dedication Fee 8% of the land value, to be determined by the City Assessor, will be required for Park Dedication Fee. ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION U2479 Peter Andrea Co. 555 Stubbs Bay Road Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page~4 * -V 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. The Preliminary Plat shows Outlet A as the proposed private road, but does not provide a means for future connection through the plat to the west. The proposed Lot 3 is accessed by a 50' Outlet B for a private driveway. Private driveways are normally platted at 30' for back lots. The plat shows a proposed rear lot line for right-of- way which may be 'taken' for an interchange. Knowing this, the City should require the lot meet 150% of zoning district requirements as a back lot recognizing the location of the rear lot line after right-of-way acquisition. The lot should meet the following requirements: A. B. Lot Area = 7.5 acres Front Setback = 150' Outlot B is shown through an existing non-Orono wetland. The status of the wetland being non-Orono does not change the need to mitigate the wetland at 2:1 on site. It is the position of City Staff the wetland not be mitigated if an alternative exists for access to Lot 3. Including extending Outlot A further to the northwest. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will require on site treatment of stormwater. The plat does not show a pond being developed. Conservation and drainage easements will be required over a stormwater pond. The subdivider has not provided information on how a driveway will cross the Orono wetland over Lot 6 between Outlot A and the proposed building site. The subdivider has not provided a wetland delineation report or septic reports. It is not possible to proceed with the application until these items have been reviewed and approved. Lots 4 and 5 would require lot width variances as they do not meet the required 300' width for the RR-1A (5 acre zoning district). The location of the building pad shown on Lot 5 may be in a location to narrow. The lot requires a lot width variance at the street and the width at the building pad is only about 180' The City will require dedication of a 17' along the west property line of Lot 5 for future right- of-way. 33' had been dedicated along the parcels to the west. #2479 Peter Andrea Co. 555 Stubbs Bay Road Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-5 '1 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the application be tabled to allow additional time for the subdivider to submit septic and wetland delineation reports. The Planning Commission should also discuss the items listed on page 5 and offer recommendations based on future access to properties located to the west. The Subdivision Ordinance requires developers plat for future access through the subdivision. This plan does not provide for future access. •• k §2479 Peter Andrea Co. 555 Stubbs Bey Road Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page—6 r Application Date: April 21,1999 Completion Date: April 21,1999 Deadline Date: August 19,1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AUG 0 9 1999 cn Y Ul- UtiONO DATE: 7/21/99 ITEM NO.: (p Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2492 Rick and Gail Luzaich 2490 Old Beach Road After the Fact Variances and Conditional Use Permit Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area:55,215 square feet (1.27 acre) A revised restoration plan will not be available for review by Staff prior to the City Council meeting on Monday, August 9,1999. Staff is requesting the Council table application #2492 and continue the item to the next regular meeting of the City Council on August 23,1999. Staff extended the 60 day application deadline on Jime 9. 1999 to allow additional time for the applicants to revise the restoration plan. The 60 day extension will expire on August 19.1999 prior to the next scheduled meeting of the City Council. The Council must take action on the variances and conditional use permit on August 9th the alternative is the applicants agree to extend the application deadline an additional 60 days and continue review to August 23,1999. J i L&. O V ku .■ GlTYofORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley ParVway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 NOTIFICATION OF 60 DAY EXTENSION June 9,1999 Rick and Gail Luzaich 2490 Old Beach Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Re: Application #2492 State law requires that Cities shall decide on zoning applications within 60 days from the date an application is considered complete. The review period may be extended by notification to the applicant. Your application date is, April 21.1999. The 60 day review period expires on Jvmc20».122S. The Planning Commission tabled your application at their May meeting to allow you to revise the plan. The City is extending your application an additional 60 days to allow time for Planning Commission and City Council review. The new expiration date is August 19.1222- The earliest potential date that the City Council could take action on this application is July 12,1999. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions. Sincerely, Paul Weinberger Assistant Zoning Administrator Telephone (612) 249-4600 • Fax (612) 249-4616 1 COUKirn k«t=et\ng AU6 0 9 t999 CITY or OHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 8/4/99 ITEM NO.: "7 Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2501 CityofOrono 3601 Bayside Road Conditional Use Permit and Variance Zoning District: LR> 1A One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre) Exhibits A B C D E F G Application Survey Plat Map 1950s Air Photo Location Map Hardcover Calculations Property Owners List Application: The City of Orono has maintained a municipal dock and walking path for many years on the north end of Stubbs Bay. A recent survey on an adjacent property has determined the dock and path leading to the dock are not located on City owned property, but rather on the adjacent property to the east. The City of Orono has a 30' wide platted right-of-way leading from Bayside Road to Stubbs Bay 'Oak Street' of the Bay View Park addition. Relocating the dock and walking path within the undeveloped Oak Street (Please refer to Exhibit C) will require filling a small amount of wetland for the path. The dock has been relocated and will remain in its existing location. A small amount of fill is necessary to provide better access to the dock. The fill would occur in a non-Orono designated wetland at the base of the dock. The purpose is to provide a better public access similar to what had existed prior to the dock's relocation this spring. The enclosed air photo showing the City dock and walkway is from the 1950s. Orono has maintained the dock for public use since it was originally constructed on the Stubbs Bay site. Until recently the City was unaware the dock was not located on public property. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 1 vote to:. ^ ♦ t i\r T Approve the variance and conditional use permit as submitted. The Planning Commission had concerns regarding the fill of a wetland, and the precedence this may have on future proposals. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the variance and conditional use permit subject to review and approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for the wetland fill. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the enclosed resolution. L : ■ 1 -■ 'iS ^■1I This application requires the following: 1. Conditional Use Permit to permit greater than 10 cubic yards of fill within 75’ of the OH WL of Stubbs Bay. 2. Variance to allow 180 s.f. (15.0%) of hardcover where no hardcover is allowed. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.03, Subdivision 19: Filling of more than 10 cubic yeirds within the shoreland area of Lake Minnetonka requires the City Council grant a conditional use permit. The total fill for the project is 21.11 cubic yards of fill. The fill would create a base to accommodate a walking path to access the dock. The proposed walking path will be consistent with the existing path located on the site. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1): To permit 180 s.f (15.0%) hardcover within the 75' setback from the (OHWL) where no hardcover is allowed under normal conditions. Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0’-75 ’1,200 s.f.Os.f.Os.f.180 s.f:To permit a 180 s.f. walk path. Permit Request from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District The proposed project requires a permit to be granted by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for filling of the wetland. Jim Hafiier, of the Watershed District, has stated the Wetland Coi^ervation Act (WCA) allows filling of wetlands up to 400 cubic feet if the City demonstrates the project has no other alternatives to avoid filling of a wetland and the project minimizes the amount of fill required for the project. Prior to any work within the wetland the Watershed District must issue a permit for the project. • i Surrounding Properties The dock is located south of Bayside Road on Stubbs Bay. There are no residences located immediately adjacent to the dock. The adjacent properties located north of Bayside Road are zoned LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential (2 acre minimum lot size). The immediately adjacent lot to the dock site is owned by the property owner to the north side of Bayside Road. The lots shown on the enclosed plat map below the OHWL of Lake Miimetonka remain on record, however all are tax forfeited properties. Issues for Discussion 1.The dock is owned and maintained by the City of Orono. It has been provided as a public dock for many years for use by the public. 2.Relocating the dock will require filling a small portion of wetland for access to the lake. The amount of fill requires the City issue a Conditional Use Permit. 3.The dock is for pedestrian use only, not for boat storage. No overnight parking is allowed along Bayside Road. 4.There is no increased impact to adjacent property owners. The dock and walkway will replace what has existed for many years. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit and variance request to relocate an existing dock based on the following: 1. The dock has existed as a public structure for many years. 2.The dock will be located on public property and continue to serve as a public access to Lake Minnetonka. 3.The amount of fill required for the project will not exceed what is necessary to provide adequate public access to the dock. % . f* •** If - V4» »• *: : A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (1) AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE NO. 2501 WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter the "applicant") is owner of a public dock and landing located at 3601 Bayside Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono 2^ning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on June 21, 1999 and July 19, 1999, at which times aU persons Hpjgiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to pennit an access trail within the 0-75’ lakeshore setback to provide public access to an existing City dock located on the North end of Stubbs Bay. The trail requires 180 sq. ft. of hardcover in the 0-75’ lakeshore where no hardcover is normally allowed; and WHEREAS, the applicant has tq>plied to the City for a conditional use pennit to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to allow filling of 180 square feet of a non-Orono protected wetland; grading within the 0-75’ lakeshore setback and within 5’ of a property line; and placement of 12 cubic yards of fill material within the 0-75’ lakeshore setback; to permit access to an existing City dock located on the North end of Stubbs Bay. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zomng File ^501. 2. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 19, 1999, and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 1. Page 1 of 4 J 3. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The municipal dock has been located south of the Stubbs Bay Road and Bay side Road intersection for many years. B. The dock has been used as a public dock for many years. Historical air photos indicate the dock has been located in this area since before 1955. C. The dock has provided public access via a narrow path of crushed rock from the street side to the dock. D. A recent survey on an adjacent property revealed the dock was located on private property and not public land. The City has a platted 30* wide corridor to &e lake from Bayside Road, known on the plat as Oak Street, where it has been thought Ae dock was located. E. Oak Street was platted on the south side of Bayside Road as part of the Bay View Park Addition. F. Upon discovering the dock was not on public property, it was relocated to the present site, within the "Oak Street." G. The access path to the relocated dock requires a variance to exceed allowed hardcover on the site and a conditional use permit to allow filling of 180 square feet of a non-Orono protected wetlaixl; grading within the 0-75’ lakeshore setback and within 5 ’ of a property line; and placement of 12 cubic yards of fill material within the 0-75’ lakeshore setback; to permit access to an existing City dock located on the North end of Stubbs Bay. The fill is required within a non-Orono protected wetland to provide easy access and handicapped accessibility. The grade is uneven providing difficult access. H. Wetland fill shall be minimal so not to affect the treatment of water entering Stubbs Bay. Page 2 of 4 4. 5. 6. I.The site has historically been used as a snowmobile access to Stubbs Bay. The Luce Line Trail located north of the bay is open for snowmobile use west of Stubbs Bay Road. The access is ^e link between Lake Minnetonka, the Luce Line and Stubbs Bay Road. The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fne hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The CiQr Council fmds that granting a conditional use permit to allow an access trail to provide public access to the City dock will not be detrimental to the health, safeQ^ or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above fmdings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit an access trail within the 0-75 ’ lakeshore setback to provide public access to the City dock located on the North end of Stubbs Bay and grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to allow less than 400 cubic feet of wetland to permit an access to the public dock, subject to the following conditions: Page 3 of 4 1.The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District shall issue a permit for land alteration within the wetland area. 2.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council’s approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (August 9, 2000). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of August, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of August, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 I I f\ Application # Q I Date Reccived3^iT3333 Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 5^i/j IBS iL^Ab t>jSlC£ ACcIl5T Type of Application to be Filed_TUT Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) APPLICANT Nam e OlTon^___________^Phone (work)^/Z' ^6^ Address SPoirb/W/ay City "Dro/i^ Zip Phone (home) 6 ] I" 2 .4* ^ Of OWNER (if different than applicant) City d T __________ AddressT-T' f^Hey V^irf-WAy City OroA G Name Phone (home) 6 1 1- ^^9*" Phone (work)“^Z-" L4 7 ~‘t-6Q^ Zip Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - • $ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____$175.00 Residential Accessory Use _____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use ^ $250,00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more "7^ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore >RDy * 0 u P •Flu. > JO of V O-V iOwVSJUL k«ur<icooav* 0-*7S' *.» PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from ori^ial application^ After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commerci?! Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation _____$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule # B# 2 'A PW' i 1 oMss»)wiaisKiVMO\(no\ivoQAVinais\NKMri\fri\NJOHfl NNOD sn/tA IIVQ aiAO»M*fr ovimsio nrn NMMIO Mvn »mo AlAHnS 25K M«t 3M fimootsir f WKMV ooiusm#tr^ON OM i WMi 31VIS INI iOi tOJNQNrWNOtS^IiniM 0IVUSI91II A100 H0AMI34OS 131NN) AN MIONn HO ]fl INOrflH HO ‘NOItVSilOVfS ‘N^HH SlU IVHl AJ1H13 AHM9I I qMVPiy 1 tmvffivj $®l»possvK\lyg )fiMapuvJ^ 9U9S0)f Sra o(U)sauog|^ SS303V AV0 seams ViOS3NNm *ONOdO i z < q >- <oo oz < F? li.o < UJ o llj (/) <2 Ll. 0> 9$ oi ^ GO (/) ^ O O) oro G) O C>4 O) iSy / "i 1 r---------f d'e^4 000C6 C’626 F5F8 d'dcd TTW »»’2C6 6’ltd T5fl rm 6* ltd 7 60K6 rwi cxte IT 1 1 rife €'K6 1 1 1 r^6 ■ fl'WA—940930920iMru/ O f/ —0*5?* Scs S o o «D s; ? o CM Ll-oa:a si I § § I 5 5 8 (/)z o Ll. SC5*4C'W (CHRISTINE . I • ■ • * > Jf5> ^ 06) 53 « # > I2C. 38 y>' EILEEN ST■? . • • ••*,•* * I*''y :k 3 (!2) ■;i789 « iUTtOT 8* ' 119'> c :i^ /•IQ-,5) •4 :j\ ..............................• . . - « r-- . - Wfm •0 (:io^' A O')_________L- =C ; S i 8 r j\i •'• ,0 9 8 I 7 I 6'ts : 1 V ! ‘ • ! i • *: . *,' \ \f:. *•....• ‘ -a-vX'.■i'i ....... . • 'i. I i ‘.r i;* L ^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONeCT 0-7?^ Vrc posed ,EXlBTlNe-HARDCOVER IN ZONE HARDCOVER CALCULATION IVORKSHEET 75-250’ 250-500’500-1000* F A House S.F. Length Width X X X S.F. S.F. SE. B. Garage S.F. C. Driveway X X S.F. S.F. D. .SMewalk 30 X X 180 s:f. ST. E. Patio/Deck X X ST. ST. F. Landscape ' Underl^ By Plastic X X X ST. ST. S.F. G. Other ST. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONF /SO tso + B 6^^ O X 100 - ST. ST. % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE £"xis+ir\j 0*7_a. A. House ST. Length Width X X X ST. ST. S.F. B. Garage C. Driveway ST. X X ST. ST. D. Sidewalk ST. ST. E. Patio/Deck X X ST.. ST. F. ljuidscape Underls^ By Plastic X X X ST. ST. ST. G. Other ST. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ __ + B _ _ X 100 A B ST. A S.F. B % ■i —• ) RUN DATE 05/27/99 HEWIEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INPORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI935401 PACE 1 BATCH 002 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAtffi/AOOR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 05-117-23 12 0010 03500 BAYSIDE RO X R 0 L T OLSEN KEVIN R OLSEN 3500 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE HN 55350 SO 05-117-23 12 0011 00105 BEDERWOOD DR GEORGE S TERP GEORGE S TERP 105 BEDERWOOD DR LONG LAKE HN 55350 30 05-117-23 12 0012 00105 BEDERWOOD DR HAR6ARET H WXLLIAHS HAR6ARET H WXLLIAHS 105 BEDERWOOD DR LONG LAKE HN 55350 SB 05-117-23 13 0011 00220 BEDERWOOD DR ALISHAH S AZAD ALXSHAH S AZAD 200 BEDERWOOD DR LONG LAKE HN 55350 30 05-117-23 13 0017 03500 BAYSIDE RD KYLE FAHILY LTD PTNRSHP RICHARD 0 KATHLEEN A KYLE 1140 TONKAWA RD LONS LAKE HN 55350 30 05-117-23 13 0041 03500 BAYSIDE RD J W I J P BARTLETT JEFFREY 0 JO ANNE BARTLETT 3560 BAYSIDE ROAD LONG LAKE HN 55356 30 05-117-23 13 0047 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED KYLE FAHILY LTD PTNRSHP R KYLE OKA KYLE 1140 TONKAWA RO LONG LAKE HN 55350 30 .05-117-23 IS 0040 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED K R 8 L T OLSEN KEVIN R OLSEN 3509 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE HN 55356 30 05-117-23 13 0049 00222 BEDERWOOD DR JEFFREY D HUELLER JEFFREY D HUELLER 222 BEDERWOOD DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 30 05-117-23 21 0011 03040 BAYSIDE RD HERBERT T OLSON I WIFE HERBERT B JANE OLSON 3040 BAYSIDE RO LONG LAKE HN 55350 30 05-117-23 21 0012 03025 EILEEN ST JOHN G PIOGEON 0 WIFE JOHN t HAGDALEN PIOGEON 10912 GLEN WILDING LANE BLOOHINGTON HN 55431 30 05-117-23 24 0023 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HERBERT T OLSON A WIFE HERBERT T OLSON 3640 BAYSIDE ROAD LONG LAKE HN 55350 30 05-117-23 24 0039 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HERBERT T OLSON I WIFE HERBERT T OLSON 3040 BAYSIDE ROAD LONG LAKE HN 55356 30 05-117-23 24 0117 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 00 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 30 05-117-23 24 0110 . 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 i A \ I ( *• ^ • Io 1 • 4 TOTAL BATCH 002 00015 Mr. PaulWeinberger Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 July 19,1999 Regarding: July 19, 1999, Planning Commission Meeting Dear Mr. Weinberger, I am unable to attend this evening’s Planning Commission meeting, but would like to re^ster my opinion regarding land alteration on Stubbs Bay near the public dock. I am against the alteration for two reasons. Alteration will increase snowmobile traffic causing more pollution to an already high traffic area. Also, drainage from Stubbs Bay Road and Bayside Road will only increase directly into the bay without the benefit of the wetland filtration step. I appreciate your consideration of my viewpoint. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Madalen Pidgeon Property Owner r L_ Application Date: Completion Date: 60 Day Deadline: 6/23/99 6/23/99 8/22/99 couwrii mretinq AUG 0 9 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cn » '-'r Onoi^v.; DATE: 7/21/99 ITEM NO:8 Department Approval: Name Kris Jenson Title Asst. Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2504 Wanen and Tana Garrett 650 Brown Road North Variances Zoning District: LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre) Lot Area:3.93 Acres (Approximately 2.8 acres dry and buildable) Application: The applicants submitted an application requesting variances in order to construct a 12' X 20' home addition, an addition to the existing deck, and construction of an inground swimming pool, as well as to place a 5' high split rail fence along the south property line, from die driveway to the lakeshore (app. 800' in length), in order to keep users of the Long Lake City Park from trespassing on their dock and property. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: To unanimously approve: 1.A variance from the Average Lakeshore Setback in order to construct the home addition, the deck addition, and the inground swinuning pool with a surrounding deck. To unanimously deny : 1. Variances to allow the construction of a 5' high split-rail fence, 800' in length, from the driveway to the lakeshore. ■‘I i *' * J I :> - ■4 1 ;i ■ ^.«> CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612.249.4600 ZONING HLE # 2504 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE; July 21,1999 TO: Warren and Tana Garrett 650 Brovvn Road North Long Lake, MN 55356 COPIES:Michael Lamb 576 Brown Road North Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: July 19,1999 VOTE; 7 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval of a variance for the Average Lakeshore Setback in order to construct a 12' x 20' house addition, an addition to the existing deck, and an inground swimming pool with a deck surround. The Planning Commission voted to deny the request for a 5' high split-rail fence which would run along the soudi propoerty line approximately 800', from the driveway to the lakeshore. The request required variances for height, encroachment into the side yard, lakeshore setback, and average lakeshore setback. The applicant verbally withdrew that portion of the application which dealt with the fence at the meeting. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: August 9,1999 If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. If you have questions, please call Kris Jenson at 612.249.4600. I, A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C)(6) AND DENYING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 15 (D), SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B), AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C) (1),(5), AND (6) FILE NO. 2504 WHEREAS, Warren Garrett and Tana Garrett (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 650 Brown Road North within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 34, Township 118, Range 23 lying South of a line drawn East at right angles to the West line of said Government Lot 1 from a point thereon distant 1170.7 feet south along said West line from the Northwest comer of said Government Lot 1. Except that part lying Easterly of the Northeasterly extension of the Northwesterly line of Block 8, Town of Long Lake, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (hereinafter "the property"); and V^HEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C)(6) for an average lake, hore setback variance to allow the construction of a 12' x 20' addition to the home, an addition to the existing deck, and an inground Zoning Code Sections 10.03, Subd. 15(D), Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B), and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C)(1), (5), and (6) to construct a 5' hi^ 3-rail, split-rail fence along the South property line approximately 800', from the driveway to the lakeshore. Page 1 of 5 Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. 3, This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2504. This property is located in the LR-1A Zoning District where the minimum lot area requirement is 2 Acres. The property consists of approximately 3.9 acres. During the Public Hearing, the applicants verbally withdrew the request for variances to construct a fence. 4. 5. *rhe Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 19,1999 and recommended approval by a vote of 7-0 on the proposed variance based upon the following findings of fact: A. The neighboring residences were constructed after the applicant's home. B. C. D. E. The applicant's home is located approximately 400' firom the lakeshore of Long Lake. Mature stands of trees are located along both the North and South property lines, extending well past the average lakeshore setback line. The proposed house addition, deck addition, and inground pool will not block or interfere with the neighbors views of the lake. The construction of the house addition, deck addition, and inground pool will not exceed the allowable hardcover for the 2S0'-500' zone, and the total hardcover for this zone after the additions will be 21.9%. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 19, 1999 and recommended denial by a vote of 7-0 on the proposed variances to construct a fence, based upon the following findings of fact: Page 2 of 5 6. 7. A. The applicant's withdrew the request for variances to construct a fence. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants an average lakeshore yard variance to per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(C)(6) to permit the construction of a 12' x 20' addition to the home, a 400 sq. ft. addition to the existing deck, and the construction of an 28' x 56' inground pool surrounded by a deck, and denying variances to construct a fence. Approval was sublet f-> the ft. :’ >wing conditions: 1.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 9,2000). 2.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate and authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 5 4 Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on die 9th day of August, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss« ■ ■ COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of August, 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss« COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this___________day of __j 199. before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) fi%e act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 !( ‘ ---------•PTT*'*" STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this___________day of __j 199__, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. IT*lx Notary Public Page 5 of 5 4 'i ••4 • TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members • Ron Moorse, City Administrator . FROM:Kris Jenson, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: July?, 1999 . SUBJECT; #2504 - Warren & Tana Garrett, 650 Brown Road North Variance Request Zoning District: LR-IA Application:The applicant proposes to in«rtall a 3 rail, split-rail fence, 5' in height, along the south property line to the lakeshore as well as a home addition, a deck addition and an inground swimming pool with decking around the pool, all located between the house and the lake. STAFF SUMMARY Firstj the applicants are planning an addition to the Northeast comer of the home. The. addition is 12* x 20* and will line with the existing North wall of the home and the existing East side of the deck. Second, the aj^licants are proposing a deck addition and inground swimming pool. The total surface area of the additions, along with the eristing hardcover in the 250-500' will not exceed 30%. The proposed deck addition will be added to the souUieast comer of die' existing deck, widi die inground pool located approximately 30' east of the existing deck. The variance reqiured for diwe items is the average lakeshore setback. Since the applicant’s home is located closer to the lake than either of its neighbors, the average lakeshore setback is their existing home, or approximately 385'. Along the north and south property lines are mature stands of trees that buffer the view to either property owners to the north and south. Staff feels that the proposed location is the most lo^cal, and it >^^1 not block or interfere with the view of either nei^bor towards the lake. Finally, the applicants are proposing a 3-rail, split rail fence, no more than 5' in height, to run along the south proper line, from the driveway to the lakeshore, approximately 790 ’ in length. The applicants want a fence due to the fact that the neighboring lakeshore owner to the soudi is a Long Lake City Park, and the applicant's have had people trespass on their property and dock. The applicant's feel Aat the proposed fence will be high enough to deter trespassers, but will not block the view of the townhome owners. The President of the West Shore Townhome Association has written a letter to the City protesting any fence being erected on the applicants property. A copy of the letter is included in the exhibits. M2S04 WcoTtn & Tana CarrtU 630 Brmm Road tforih Jufy7.!999 Paget f Ii - • • In order to place a fence along the South property line, variances from several codes would be required. The Shoreland Overlay District does not allow any unsewered structures within 100' of the OHWL. Other variances include height, as in side yards no fence over 42" may be located closer to the shoreline than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residences on adjacent lots. Staff is also unsure as to the need for a fence for the entire proposed area, as a significant portion of the fence will run along the wooded area on the south property line. The only place the proposed fence could be placed without a variance is in the side and rear yard. Variances from the following ordinances: 1. Section 10.22, Regulations for "LR-IA"..., Subd. 1, Lakeshore Set Back Regulations, (B) No principal or accessory structure shall be located within 75 feet of the lakeshore nor closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence building s on adjacent lots except that this does not apply to structure allowed in subsection A above. 2. Section 10.03, General Provisions, Subd. 15, Non-Encroachments, (D) Side Yards In side yards, no fence or over 42 inches m height above original grade may be located closer to the shoreline than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent ' lots, such fences shall not be constructed within 75 feet of the shoreline, (pg 256) 3. Section 10.56, Shoreland Management, Subd. 16, Shoreland Overlay District Standards, (C) Placement of Structures bn Lots, (1) Setbacks from OHWL, (5) Fences, Docks, Retaining Walls, and (6) Average Lakeshore Setback. Number (1) states: Structure setbacks from the Ordinary Hi^ Water Level: Long Lake is classified as a Recreational Development Lake, vduch has a 100* setback for unsewered structures. Number (5) states: No fence shall be placed witiun the shore .<;etback zone. Number 6 states: No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than tile average distance fium the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lofr -... The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line coimecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on tiie immediately adjacent lakeshore lots, (pgs 376-11 & 376-12) ANALYSIS District Standards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard • Lakeside Yard 2 acres 100’50'30'75’ t2S04 H'larrtn & Tata GarrtU 630 Brown RoadUorih July?. 1999 Fogt2 •| I! '« f Subject Property Lot Area and Yards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside Yard 2+ acres •• . •• • 170’ at lake, 150' at house 355' to garage • • 30', 60’ •• 450', Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 75'-250'37,500 sq. ft 11.8% 30% ■21.9%0 • STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP • • The applicant has provided a statement of hardship on the application form (see Exhibit Al) • • ISSUfiS 1. Applicants are in a somewhat unique situation in that the lakeshore nei^bor is a public park. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends cq>proval of the variance for Average Lakeshore Setback for the purposes of putting an addition on the house, an addition on the deck, and to construct an inground swimming pool with a deck surround. Staff recommends denial of the variance of hei^t, average lakeshore setback, and encroachments in side yards, for the purpose of placing a 5' high fence along die South property line to the lakeshore. Attachments: A Application Al Applicant's Statement of Hardship A2 Sketch ofProposed Additions by Applicant • • . A3 Photos of Area Submitted by Applicant (actual photos vdll be available at the meeting) Plat Map Survey Map with Proposed Additions Hardcover Survey of Lot showing Wetlands Neighboring Property Owners List ••• • :• West Shore Townhome Association Letter B C D E F G §2504 Wamn St. Tana Garrttt 650 Brown Road North July 7.1999 PagiS ‘it A 4 . • • cmr OF ORONO - variance application • Initial Application Fee S250.00 . .. ■ ; (S50.00.per each additional variance) . ‘ ! Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from ori^al application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Application# • Date Received Amount Paid 1 • •* • • • *• PROPERTY INFORMATIQ She Address J______ ____________RA ’ Property THentifeation Number (P.I.D.) 17* — Attach legal description to appHcatipn if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired I (dp not) also own the adjacent parc^ of land. Present use of property: readential ___other (specify) Tuning iMstrict: _(montiifyear) •• • #• APPLICANT ^ 4l AddressT^57^ yf/. B iTAU ia ^EA Name Phone (horned Phone(woik1 • ^ WV\ /! • •» Pity. . • • * • OWNER Q£ different tiian applicant) Name_____/^SCi\iC----- Phone (home). Phone (worki Address:City:.Zip:, DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: cTyhmii dCp. 9 nstruction Cost $. (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ' • * Ix)t Width Hardcover.Lot Coverage . • • Setback Front Side ' Rear Average Lakeshore V Other (specify) HABDSBaP/DESCBiraON OF TOTOSOAL FROPERTV CONPmONS gns Describe undue hardship or practical difficult or unusud prMS^.^o^"* Pr®''® 8 compliance with Zoning Code requirements: (attach additional sheets if necessary) S I • • • • •• • REQUIRED SUBMIITALS • • • • * • • y^.11 of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete: . •. • • •. ••1. 2. i/ >:\ Completed Application Form ' • ’ .-V • ‘ •• . • • • • • mm y/ Certified Property Owners List of owners "Vvithiri 150', labels and plat map (you; • must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of 3. ^ Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). 4. Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. . In addition, provide one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproduction. 5. 6. 7. 8. /'/A Topographic surv^ (ejosting and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) cojy 814" x 11" for reproduction. vQ Sketches or plans of floor & devation "wows provide one (1) copy 814" x 11"). \/ List of the legal names Occlude marital status) of all persons with an intwest in .the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owher(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this applicatiorL ___ Additionkl items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that jenr Variahce^appllcation is not complete if the above infonpation has not ^een included. • • • APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to prowde all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by origjnal fee payment) and/or - consultant expenses incurred in rewew of this application, and certifies that the information supplied>is ^e and cormet to flie best of his^r knov^dge. Applicant's Sigh^turj late OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner herdjy acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City stafi; consultants, agents. Commission members, and.Qojmcil members for purposes of investiution and verification ofj^ reqi Owner's Sigilal • • Applicant must have all submittals into the City ofBces 25 days before the-PIannmg Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are hdd on the third-Monday of-each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, plepe make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. < • I r,. • *9 June 22,1999 : •.** CityofOrono Attn: Planning Commission and City' Council Members P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Re: Request for Variance We are submitting a request for variance for average lakeshore set back for a and for the following proposed plans to our house and property at 650 N. Brown Rd.: 1. 18 ’ X 36’ Inground Swimming Pool - Vinyl lined Location will be east side of house(lakeside) & 30-35 ft from house. * 2.’ 400 sq. ft. addition to eidsting deck on east and southeast corner of house. Footage is split up Into 2 levels. 3. Addition to house structure main and walkout level, NE comer -Totalsq.ft. 480. 4. Spilt rail fencing not to exceed 5’In ht. extending east along south properly line from pur driveway to lakeshore. We believe this Is the most aestheticly looking fence. See enclosed drawing and survey for further detail on ail of the abovo proposed plans, Description of hardship: a. Our properly is located on the west end of Long Lake and all Improv^ents we would like to make are located between main dewelllng and Long Lake. b. Lakeshore property owner on northside- (690 N. Brown) - home was built after ours and setback further from lake than ours c. Lakeshore property owner on southside Is Long Lake City Park - Westshore Townhomes are not lakeshore property owners, therefore, we believe not be applicable to the avg lakeshore setback variance. Note: Next possible affected lakeshore properly Is east of Long Lake City Park, d) A I • : f 1 : ' I i! •I i f • •; 6. With our property ajolned to the City of Long Lake’s park at the shoreline, we have had park patrons trespass on our property and dock. Therefore, we are requesting that we be allowed to erect a split rail fence extending all the Way to the shoreline. A 3 rail, split rail, fence is needed to help keep v/ould be trespassers from slradling over a shorter 2-raiI fence. ‘ - •• - - , . . • Pictures have been enclosed to help illustrate views from and around our property which depicts heavy vegetation between us and our neighbors to the north and south. Also, proposed structures would not Inpede on our neighbors* views of the lake. We hope this Information Is sufficient for your review and meets the criteria for approval. Sincerely. • . • Warren and Tana Garrett 650 N. Brown Rd. Orono, MN 55356 612-476-0219 .* t - % ■ • • .. • • . • .... *•, . Vv > • V • • <£> ■ 1 ■'! *1 *1 .i: .i 1 » • h*l • • • • • •• • • •mm • • • • • •«••• •••*• • *• •••• ^ t • •ap • ••• • ••• ••••• ••I •••• •»4 •# •• • »•••«•« # • •• • • • • • # ^a. a- .* • • - a. I • • • ’.«•••• • • • • • m* •m • « • • • • # • ••• • ••*•••*« • A* mmmm ^ m m m • • ••• #••• • » 9 • • • ••rnm^m • •••« • • •• • mmm^* ^ m mm m*• • m • m m m • • ••*•• mm*• nm m^m m • ••• • • ta a •. •• 'A a • •* ••• • ••• ••^ m a»«a>» •• • aa * aw «a aa • • •.• a a* >^a t ____ • • • a ^ • a* . • • ». aW* • •• • «—*a* ' • * • a •• #_________* Occl{ • • mm •• • .#• •• • • • • • mm* i":.te&::::;r.- • a ai« a a • »• a» a •a‘ • * . • »^ • • • ^ . • a* . • a* • • Qiar^j t ,, •a* • a»,*»a*»a .*a a > • • •. ‘ • a a • a »• • ••a a a • a •a a a a a a • a •a . a. . a — a / • • j.• • • ^ •••• M-'Pr: ^::« • • • •• • I a a • «B • . a a a • « * a aa • aa aw • •• • #•*- a aW • a*a««- • • •• • .a a w a • a a aaaa«* a •• a. aawa ••• .• a •• • • *••• • • .* . aa .aaaaa a . • , r •aw *• • ••* •• * a a . . .• • • • a a • a •a. a a • a • a a» a • aa a a a • aa • w»«*a« • aa*«a • •»a • a • • • • • • • • • • •• •• • m • * IT fV * 1.I .> 1 liiJLiXLclUZlr-- ■ •■ V. •y ; -i'< ■' ■ ■■;' • ■ •'. -•■•■- • '-;! ■d^i F'ici'^ - t'J n I^Ff" /fei'y f V’^^fKian ’T^O^M Tdi^f^hoyip/D ^ ^5^ . r. -V-.C. ■••-.* • • • • t * . tmim t ‘?V r '*'^ ■F ~im r^- Ivj-i-:''.:'..•, ;... /r'.-.XJ’. vi '. ,V; >•■: ::•■■ ■ ..*.■ ■ '• f^c^inj V:^U^ ■f'^o/n Shtrsl'int - 5/?<:)uj;^ \/d^hiiOn bduifM r’ '•■ ^V*^ '•V 'Vi 'V • • * ■•4r'V ‘'^'''W/ W^m% r- ,r # - f - •'-_- *. "«rf .- 't • .c**, ‘*TiT • r** N. V. . ' v! • -rjy.- - t * :'V;:,-/V \\r -•. . ....^c-.'>-4-i- ’•W- . ••• ^ • V mm rfiT.lv V.*- «» I V. k n V..X X:-/ z O . • XVlrv : .*/Vi : f > ^ ’. * r»y. ^ ^'±y>c-:":-S?y -•'■'. t-. - -4. r-.-. .1. i>'" r*. • - *r- , i -.-.-Tr.- , • "r'i-.v -^ i*—W'». , -r,'. ..............-'•... . i . i k-*'. * .■ •• - ? ■ '. i .• . * .4. \J[)5W l/[fw - • * I . «i- I M LyJ) C** rl V ^1' fitIs •V . . 0Mu/, f'-"9 t'rs' •IS ^ouih S/‘Oi^ u..'.»; ^iyfhh- \^JC& IK zw .r^r-t-.-A • . • •• /'*^ t* . • ■/ '5 - • """• ^': t- '* * -1 ^’*'* !*^;X'‘■. 1*'.^?^ -!>•' . ^ •'.■'•% * *-w *5"-“ . v< -* •..'.'■a w ■ ^ ■/ •f •■I C.*,. Nl.- ■•:*• •" • \ -• ■ .‘^v--"^ '; .^T^“'--.:..^^^.-ii" --Jr'ri'^ '•->' ■• ‘vV*;' '/.r:•' •: ■•.:--; ' . • .- • •♦-«. • ______ _- - - • •• * ■ • . t '* —. J.‘ J -» ^ • .V r •- V .I4**!. > -O.' /ydrfh F^c^'O/r-k ........./iJ^t In ^^oV/] ------- 4H 6lM 4 dvr l&s •.rX K ■tf CtrnAi li/lf§ i-Ownhoy/iS- '!'^ ‘^^ Soo f/l -^;r« '•X -i A"*/f V* V/, «•'- .TV.r __ H87M9*M*f esr.34smue (ao) (82) 1s (77)0 (79) H !i»9 1 “ 3 j_ 2_ A......-*«..i......*:HilKM\m____o (87)03- 0 (9013 a .• .V* • • • » , / .. f •’ll. *: • • ■ 0: ■ gCM K^ - ‘ i.| ^ .0 t iS ” S ‘-flC •■••JS :, S '3'--"S. I O '••;> • { « vS ? >:2E "i ■# ■• ■ftr* V 55 fe •* ^ ■ f. L<*; .o*;; ^ \rr 3- Vi• ••jpumzz U4z- t ,, m P-i|P N Q( so'' H <rv SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 HAIIDCOVER CALCmATION WO 75-250' TYTSTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ^ M mA. House 5T6' /mO-500'j 500-1000' •ZZ3S Length Width • . ; X X X • • • * B. Garage ' C. Driveway • • • '^Af<lpi\p,\ />hw. *X 7S _X X 7S M-X X zbm-X X 3A 2^ F. Landscape . Underlain By Plastic 20 X X X G.‘ Odier • • •• • • A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ^-cTiA tot ^oe ^ty ar^ m zon^ + B ________X 100 ^p^pngpn HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ------- J2.Length X X X widthm__ B. Oarage C. Driveway ZSL____X X T). Sidews^ Fyaft i E. Pati X X Zb //) + AJiu) X X 3A F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic zo X X X ^ /UeoL lb__ G. Odict /j£M)Pdol m Sk f?Ai SP. S.F. SP. •SP. . • • *r t SP. 625“SP. SP. SP. SP. ^6b SP. SP. SP. __________ SP. ■ SP. . SP. SP. % % zzso SP. , m SP. SP. SP. SP. c •■1 1 'a I l^?X SP. SP. SP. SP. - .SP.. SP. SP. SP. SP. ^j2dl _sj. SP. 'jfmsi , 4 •• » I••• t% 1 • • • .i .1 .1 ••I •• I •• f \• *.* •I •I•1 ’:>fL • - V - JUT*-’- ‘V'j» C.\ 3 ? • 9»*m / ••V •{ . 5 • O Hiff:S ;P.v- • I •• « • M IC *. • 1*1^ H»a aw • Is •f’et«B |2 . iC *•* • • 5-JH- « * '1. 8«e C h. !•*• • >f^ fl• •» . to r<« «M «• • o »• a a an. »i«a A4 Ob 0«« > a flb «• «• O •« ji JO •» # H *•H M • fl •• m* a e «« » o f( • M Q O if » !• •« «•«« ajijt o • M«« a •» Vu •• « • o m n « AKia « o «,«« Ml* M fl • M Q e • m u o o p Si n •* c •4 ft a« O «f lo a U if u 4 « • w a ^ S • I* MM • •*•• •• M • • 0 « »» •« H • 0 i* O P%a m»mm m tt m U M» ^ Ik* O U 0 •fa«O*«O*«0ifO O * U 0 fl •# A U m» m 0 «• 0 0.0 MM 0M 0 O •fW a« ■ > O o o 0^ !• toje ts ck *0 • • o e •« 0 WM O0**i*t«a o 0wr<* KO 0 a u*0 0»« 0a»x*« O 0 O «f 0 • MS 0 0 0 0 •« 0 0 O 0 •» 0 l«4l o • U Mm 0^0*«U«>- 0 aif 0 M Ck U O W M W 0 0 O tmss 0 o *f O !• •0 0M0I 0 • U •« 0M 0 0 49 0rvdl 0MO.0M 0rt 049 •• 0 M 00M*i0»J»^ 0J9 0 A.0 O ••••MU000M0 00 0O0**nw 49 m 049 »• M M O O H M *4 MMia 0aJ VI •T*c ‘•1^ J4 04- Si aV |5 *8?JJ • I f I •• • • • • k.‘ ■ •• 4 t * * %% • 0 • : , •• • < • •• I* «• !;• r •. 0 ^ • a ^ . 0,,V il* • •. -I-Xi -#?>s 'V-r-• v;io' ■ op uy e f‘H f?y 'fwu *1 n /.*•? »».'/ MA *? ® ------------------------------------------------------------------- m.M tmmt sM!. — 1' *,:■ -J ICS-' • ••. ^ —iWII— SfMS .1 a «n mCi% \ C • • >• •«• • ••v. . .• V /•I •V K *. «• • ‘K w. • •» 7,\^ ■ • • • ;• • • . .. •% • • • • • *j • ;•* .• Ill • • > • • L RUN DATE 06/21/99 • • HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM property owners UST. . BATCH 502 • . • ;prop*addr! • AtflJCD tlAMU L SB S<^-116-23 12 0004. _ _ 00650 DROHN RO M OWNER NAME TANA R SEIDOLD 1TAXPAYER TAMA R GARRETT ' NAHE/AODR 650 DROHN RD N LONG LAKE MM 55356 • • L L • :72 34-118-23 13 0002 ’ . .. o!|NER*MAHE . JEROME A*?PATRICIA DORCERT • TAXPAYER ■ JEROME A A PATRICIA DORCERT ■’ NAHE/ADOR • 570 BROHM RO M ’ LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 13 0076 pROPJUHHt' *00574 . BROWN RD N • PROP ADDR 72 34-118-23 13 0079 '00574 * BROWN RD N- OWNER MAjME . INEZ t CAITO*t taxpayer ’ NAI^ADDR 574 BROWN RD N HB LONG LAKE MM 55356 • • • t 72 34-118-23 13 0082 GERALD M t JANET A KNOXTAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 574 BROHM RD M RD LONG. LAKE KN 55356 • : PROP ADDR 72. 34-118-23 13 0085 00576 . BROWN RD N 5* OWNER NAME TERESA FORREST ’ TAXPAYER TERESA LAMB I . • . • 38 34-118*^23 21.0028 00038 ADDRESS >UNASSXGNED SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC SUGAR HOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC C/0 REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO 3525 WEBSTER AVB MPLS MM 55416 . 72 34-118-23 13 -0066 00072 ADDRESS UNASSICNED dTY. OF LONG LAKE city’ of long lake PO BOX L - 1964 PARK AVE LONG LAKE HN '55356 72 34-118-23 13 0077 00574 BROWN RD N HVAJATHURK RHONDA E WILSON 183 MEADOW LN LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 13.0080 *00574 • BROWN RD N channxng stowell hi CHANNXNG STOWELL XIX 574 BROWN RO N RC * LONG LAKE HN 55356 • • .1 72 34-118-23 13 0083 00574 ' BROWN RD N 0 H KNOX * J A KNOX GERALD M S JANET A K^ 574 BROWN RD N HD LONG LAKE HN 55356 ^4 72 34-118-23 13 6100 60672 'ADDRESS OMASSICHEO WEST SHORE TOWNHOMES ASSN C E VAN EECKKOUT 120 SOUTH DROWN RO LONG LAKE HN 55356 • • • REPORT MO. PI435401 PACE 5 38 34-118-23 24 0058 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED SIDNEY B A BARBARA REBERS SIDNEY B A BARBARA REBERS 3525 WEBSTER AVE ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 . 72 34-118-23 13 0071 01964 WAYZATA BLVD W STATE BANK OF LONG LAKE STATE DANK OF LONG UKE 1964 WAYZATA BLVD W LONG LAKE HM 55356 72 34-118-23 13 0678 00574 BROWN RO N INEZ L OANTZ INEZ L GANTZ . 574. BROWN RD N RB LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 34-118-23 13 0081 00574 DROHN RD N aiANNXNG STOWELL HI CHANNXNG STOWELL XU 574 BROWN RO N RC LONG LAKE HN 55356 ‘ 72 34-118-23 13 0084 ’ 00576 BROWN RD N * TERESA FORREST TERESA LAMB- 576 DROHN RD N RA LONG LAKE MM . 55356 D • • • • • V. • • •• •• ** • • • 38 34 118 23 12 0007 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MJ & JG CALIHAN JENNIFER & MARTIN CALIHAN 690 BROWN RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 f • • • • « * f City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55320 jijM 1 6.1S99 CITY Or CnO.XO Attention: Paul Weinberger Assistant Zoning Administrator Subiect: Protest of Proposed Fence by Warren and Tana Garrett Dear Mr. Weinberger; Mr Garrett has informed us that he intends to add a fence between jur adjoining properties extending to the shoreline of Long Lake. The West Shore Townhome AssocUtion considers this proposed fence both unnecessary and degrading to our property. Therefore, on behalf of the We;*. Shore Townhome Association, we hereby protest any issuance or approval of a permit or request for variance to Warren and Tana Garrett; 650 North Brown Road, Orono, for such a fence. Should you require.any further mformation, please contact the undersigned on 612473-5551. Your consideration of this matter would be appreciated. Sincerely Yours, Michael Lamb President West Shore Townhome Association CC: Warren and Tana Garrett j r To:Mayor Jabbour and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Re: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner August 5,1999 COUNCIL MEETING AUG 0 9 1999 cn Y ur UHONO #2505 The Bancor Group Inc. Southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North 2445 County Road 6 Sketch Plan Review 2^ning District:RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential, 2 Acre minimum lot size Site Area:58 Acres Proposal:52 Lot Subdivision - Single Family Units Exhibits: A B C D E F G H I J Application Legal Description Applicant Concept Plan — Letter dated June 23,1999 Location Map Site Plan/Survey Zoning Map Site Topography Wetland Map Section 10.20 R-1A Zoning District Standards Section 10.32 Planned Residential Development Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.20 - R-1 A Zoning District Standards 2. Section 10.32 - Planned Residential Development 3. Section 10.53 - Planned Unit Development H2505 The Bancor Group 2445 County Road 6 (County Road 6 and Willow Drive North) Subdivision — Sketch Plan 8/9/99 page-1 1 Summary of Request: The City of Orono has received a sketch plan application for a 58 acre parcel located at the southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. The applicants have submitted a proposal to subdivide the property into 52 lots, with an average density of less than 1 acre per lot. This is assuming the total property dedicated for right-of-way, ponding and wetlands will exceed 6 acres on the site. The property is zoned RR-IB requiring 2 acres per unit. The applicants request the property be rezoned to R-1A allowing 1 acre per unit density and develop the property as a Plaimed Residential Development (PRD). The purpose of a PRD is to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation of natural open spaces and to counteract the effects of urban congestion. A PRD/R-1A development would allow the property to be developed at one unit per acre allowing the lots to be less than one acre leaving the remaining land as open space by the creation of conservation outlots. The proposed site plan, dated 6/22/99, shows Outlots A and B as open space. The outlots would be held in common by the homeowner's association. The City reviewed an application on this site in 1994 for a 58 unit development. The Planning Commission advised the 58 unit density was not acceptable but would consider a plan for reduced density. The applicant revised the plan leaving the north half of the property at 2 acre density and rezoning the southern half to allow 1 unit per acre density. This plan would have created 44 lots on the 58 acre site. The applicant later requested the application be withdrawn prior to plat approval. Rezoning The proposed rezoning of the site would allow higher density development. Sewer and water are available and the capacity to handle anticipated flows. The property could not sustain a rural style development with individual septic systems due to the high water table and soil types present. Discussions regarding the property to the south have indicated possible townhome umts and limited office use along Highway 12 and Kelley Parkway. The surrounding properties to this site include the Shadowood Farm development (two acre density east of Willow Drive), low density residential (two acre north of County Road 6), Orono School Campus (Future Middle School Site to the west) and possible townhome/office use along Highway 12 and Kelley Parkway (south). It may be appropriate to utilize this property as a buffer zone between the mixed uses surrounding the proposed development. Developing as a PRD would allow for the creation of conservation outlots along County Road 6 and Willow Drive allowing for the highest concentration of lots being located within the interior of the property. #2505 The Bancor Group 2445 County Road 6 (County Road 6 and Willow Drive North) Subdivision — Sketch Plan 8/9/99 page-2 A second alternative is to develop the property as a Planned Unit Development (PUD), however PUDs often accompany mixed land uses within the development. In a PIJD the Planning Commission and Council may establish zoning and use requirements within the final resolution not necessarily by the underlying zoning. Any future changes within a PUD would require Council app-oval on an Amendment to the PUD. T Jses within a PUD are limited to those uses designated by the Comprehensive Plan. If the property is rezoned it is likely the property would develop as a PRD. Wetlands The site does contain several City protected wetlands. Any proposed alteration of a wetland will require a variance fix)m the City. Wetland alteration will also require outside agency review by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, DNR and the Corps of Engineers. The applicant shall complete a wetland delineation report prior to application for Preliminary Plat. All wetlands designated by the City of Orono are not included as lot area for the purposes of zoning. Any filling of wetlands will be mitigated on site. The previous proposal mitigated within the open space outlot to the north. Access Access would be via two curb cuts along Willow Drive. The northern curb cut should be moved further to the north even with Shadowood Drive to eliminate two intersections located within 200' of each other. No individual lots shall have direct access to Willow Drive or County Road 6. Staff would recommend a greater setback to Willow Drive of 50' for the adjacent lots to maintain a rural appearance from the Road. Easements 1. 2. Standard drainage and utility easements along the property lines will be required foi the final plat. Subdivider shall grant Conservation and Flowage easements across the wetlands and ponding areas located within the development. Language in the easement documents shall restrict land alteration and removal of vegetation. §2505 The Bancor Group 2445 County Road 6 (County Road 6 and Willow Drive North) Subdivision — Sketch Plan m/99 page~3 3.Trail easements shall be created along Willow Drive and County Road 6 for connection to regional trail systems. The survey shows a proposed trail through the property. Another trail has been proposed to connect the neighborhood to the school property to the west. Park Dedication Fee 8% of the land value, to be determined by the City Assessor, will be required for Park Dedication Fee. The City of Orono has established a minimum park dedication fee per lot of $2,900 and a maximum of $4,900 per lot. Drainage The City Engineer has stated the property v^ill require regrading throughout the site due to water table issues. Stormwater ponding will also be required. The applicants shall be advised permits may be required for grading and the construction of stormwater treatment ponds. Sanitary Sewer and Municipal Water Connection The property is located within the MUSA boundary allowing for sanitary sewer connection. The developer will be responsible for providing sewer and w'ater to the site. The sewer is located along Highway 12 and will be installed along Willow Drive to the development. Estimates are sewer and water connection to be approximately $9,250 per unit, not including the construction cost. Easements along the streets may not be required for the public utilities if the roads are developed as public streets. Issues for discussion 1. 2. 3. Rezoning the property will be required to develop at a one unit per acre density. The number of units available would be determined following a wetland delineation on the property. Further proposals shall define dry buildable vs. land dedicated to wetlands, right-of-way, ponding, trail easement and open space. Should the development density include land dedicated for purposes other than open space? Park dedication fee shall be equivalent to 8% of the value of the lot with a maximum of $4,900 per lot or a minimum of $2,900 per lot. The Code does add»’<;ss land dedication for paric space rather than a cash contribution. Trail development could potentially reduce the cash portion of the park dedication. ^^2505 The Bancor Group 2445 County Road 6 (County Road 6 and Willow Drive North) Subdivision — Sketch Plan 8/9/99 page~4 4. 5. 7. Is the proposed lot layout acceptable? It appears there are a number of lots that may not yield a buildable site once setbacks have been established from ponds and wetlands. The road ending in a cul-de-sac to the north should be extended to Willow Drive to intersect with Shadowood Drive. The development would serve as a buffer between the lower density residential development to the north and east vs. the other land use types to the south and west. Outlot A will be created as an open space/conservation outlot to maintain a rural appearance from County Road 6. Is the outlot large enough to achieve this? Applicant has proposed a plan that would result in the nearest home at approximately 225' from the traveled road. 6. Only four lots will be immediately adjacent to Willow Drive. Detailed grading and drainage plans shall be provided with application for preliminary plat. Several berms are proposed throughout the development and each lot will be regraded to create walkout style homes. 8. Standard setbacks for the R-1A (1 acre) zoning district are the following: Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Setback Side Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Side Adjacent to Street 1 acre 140 feet 35 feet 10 feet 30 feet 35 feet The Council has established less restrictive zoning standards for other PRDs, including French Creek and Sugarwoods. Application for Preliminary Plat will require the following: 1.Additional application and fees for rezoning the property and conditional use permits for grading and land alteration on the site. 2.Preliminary Plat drawing showing proposed property lines, building sites, setbacks, right-of- way, trail easements existing contours 3.Lot dimensions, total property area, area of each wetland and pond, dry-buildable area of each lot, land dedicated for right-of-way and trails and area of conservation outlots. U2505 The Bancor Group 2445 County Road 6 (County Road 6 and Willow Drive North) Subdivision - Sketch Plan mm page-5 . ■ < I T f. it 4. 5. 6. Grading plan with cut/fill calculations for the site. Preliminary engineering layout of proposed new roads (including center line profile), sewer and water lines. Stormwater Management Plan. A stormwater management plan is required for all Class III subdivision applications (two full size, to scale drawings or plans and one reduced 11 "XI7” copy. A certified professional engineer registered in the State of Minnesota shall certify all plans submitted to the City. It is recommended that applicant also file for a permit with the MCWD for the stormwater management plan. Plans submitted to the City shall include the following information: 7. Any additional items requested by Staff, Planning Commission and/or the City Council. #2505 The Bancor Group 2445 County Road 6 (County Road 6 arid Willow Drive North) Subdivision ~ Sketch Plan m/99 page~6 Cl » ■ Application H CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPUCATION ■ • • t • . * • • PROPERTY LOCATION Site address Date Received (a ^9 Amount Paid A Property Identification Number ^ID) Please check one - Property K abstract or Attach legal description to application. torrens? APPUCANIV 0 ^ _ Name x^c >AH u '. SutVt _Phone (home)________ rity Hp______________Zip 5^Phone (work) ^ v Address «i^o bJ«>r Mwv-al- •_________________Phone (home) City KaW (attach list if more than one) • i existing LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District Zip jvvoHPhone (work) *^»t4 Acres Dry Land Acres Wc,t Land Acres Tcral, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (spe^)_____ PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes ^ ^ ^ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling ntes) _________ Subdivision for New Buflding Sitw Number of Building Sites ' ________Existing Units _________New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Milium Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per___Acres Sq. Ft. Diy Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) r i' EXHIBIT A 6 That part of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 28, Township 118, North Range 23 West of the 6th Principal Meridian lying Southerly of the centerline of County Road No. 6 m recorded “ Book 70, page 3844162 in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin Coimty, Mu^sota; subject to OMement for said County Road No. 6 m recorded, and subject to that portion subject property which Ues within the boundaries of Willow Drive N., and any other easement, terms, conditions and restrictions of record. #2b 1IT li •4 ■i A THE BANCOR GROUP, INC. 7575 Golden VaHey Road SUITE 250 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 (612)546-2625 Facsimfle (612) 546-7321 c June 23,1999 Mr. Paul E. Weinberger Assistant Zoning Administrator Cily of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Weinberger: Enclosed herein for consideration by the City Council, Planning Commission ^d city st^is a proposed concept plan for the approximate 58 acre parcel located at the southwest quadrant at the intersection of Willov/ Drive and County Road 6, in Orono. Our proposal is to plat the property into 52 single family homesites which would be semced by city sewer and water. As you are aware, our company is strictly a land developer Md according y our business is to develop lots for home builders. However, while Bancor will not build any of the homes, one of the principals of our company is John Schulties of LeGr^ Homes and I would anticipate that one of the migor home builders in this community would be LeGran Homes. v\^e it is difficult to be precise at this point, we would anticipate that finished homes and lots would be in the price range of $350,000 to $600,000. In designing this community, we have attempted to be sensitive to various concerns that y^u and the rest of the city staff have made us aware of. As a result the proposed concept mcorporates the following features: 1. We have attempted to lessen any adverse impact on a^oining neighborhoo^. ®re only four lots which ubut Willow Drive with all four lots facing interior streets. Additionally these four lots are set back from Willow Drive by a trailway. We are also proposing three berms along Willow Drive. There are no lots abutting County Road 6. 2 We understand that the City wishes to maintain a rural feel when traveh^ ^ng^unty Road 6. In our proposal, the nearest home would be approximately 225 fMt^m the traveled road. We believe that a gracious setback is only part of the soluhon to mamta^g this rural feel. We are proposing to construct enhanced ponds, berms and landscapmg m this area. These enhancements in coiyunction with the large setback will lessen any adverse impact on the views when traveling on Cou -ty Road 6. 3. We will fully comply with all regulations in protecting wetlands. Since we are only at concept stage, I hesitate to get too specific untU a formal wetiand plan has been approved. However, subject to regulatory approval, we would propose enhancmg several of the wetlands by expanding and deepening them. 4. Our concept includes a trailway that follows both the east and north bord^s of tte site. These trails are outside of the current road right of wa^. Further Outlet C is a trail connecting this neighborhood with the commumty facilities to the west. 5. While we recognize that the overall density is greater than the abutting neighborhood, we •..■'ll III have also provided for extensive open spaces so that our community will provide a transition with the larger lots to the north and east. As a result our proposal provides for not less f-han 14.67 acres in open space or approximately 25% of the overall site. This open space is provided for in the following manner: - Outlet A: 8.2 acres - Outlot B: 4.5 acres - Outlot C: .07 acres - Ponds outside of outlets: 1.9 acres As you are also aware, we are proposing extremely large lots along the south border due to additional wetlands, lliese wetlands have been excluded from our calculations. I understand that our request will res\ilt in a rezoning. As a previous applicant has explained, this is on expensive site to develop. With the amenities we have proposed, the cost of developing only increases. It is for this reason that our concept incorporates 52 lots. Nevertheless our plan provides for a gross density of 1.1 acres per lot. For this reason as well as those previously referenced, we believe that our proposal would be a valuable addition to the neighborhood and community. It is roy xinderstanding that this concept will be reviewed by the Planning Commission on July 19 and the City Council on August 9. I will be unable to attend the Council Meeting on August 9th due to a previously planned family vacation. However my partner John Schulties will be in attendance. Please express my apologies to the Council. We look forward to working with the City Council, Planning Commission, staff and yourself on this proposed neighborhood. We hope it will be favorably received. ^vid P. lawman President cc: John Schulties Marty Campion 1 9 §E€. M T. //<f #.0R0H0-S3 D * IV \ •i .*• I / § 10.20 SEC. 10.20. R-1A ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Subd. 1. Puipose. The "R-1 A” One Family Residential District is intended to proyid district which will allow a combination of low density residential development and limited agricultural activity. Planned residential developments may be allowed by conditional use permit. The district shall have immediate access to highways and public sanitary sewer. Subd. 2. Pennitted Uses. Within any "R-1 A" One Family Residential District, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A. One family detached dwellings. B. Public owned parks and playgrounds. C. Municipal buildings. Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any "R-1 A" One F^ly Resident!^ District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: A Schools. Public schools and parochial or private schools which teach a curriculum similar to a public school provided no buiiding shaU be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an ”R" District and that a fence be erected fifteen feet or more ftom all sheet lot lines where the abutting use is for open play, and nursery schools providing fifty square feet of playground space per pupil. 1. Uses Accessory To A High School. The following uses are accessory to a High School use and require a separate conditional use permit: a. Indoor Ice Arenas. All such facilities and structures shall be located on the same tax parcel as the principal High School Use to wWch they are a^e^ory. No such structures shall be located less than 50 feet from any lot line of an abutting lot m an R District Such facilities shall not be separated from the principal High School use by a public road. All such facilities shall be owned and operated by the school district, or by a nori-pr^t orgamMtion under a land lease arrangement with the school district The developer of such a facili^, prior to final Conditional Use Permit approval by the City Council, shall demonstrate financirf capability to complete construction of said facility, by providing suitable documentation that at least eighty percent (80%) of the estimated project costs are in the control of the school distnct or non-profi lessee. Source: Ordinance No. 145,2nd Series Effective Date: 3-11-96 ORONO CC 279 (4-1-84) ■i § 10.20 B. Churches. Churches including those related structures located on the same site which are an integral part of the church proper, convents or homes’ for persons related to a religious function on the same site provided no building other than a residence shall be located within fifty feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District. C. Clubs, Camps, etc. Golf courses, country clubs, tennis clubs, public swimming pools serving more than one family, scout camps, YMCA camps, YWCA camps, church camps, or private non- profit parks, playgrounds and other similar uses. The principal structure for any of the above listed uses shall be 100 feet or more from any abutting lot in an "R" District, and accessory structures shall be a minimum ofiifty feet from any lot line. D. Public Service Structures. Public service structures, including but not limited to electric transmission lines, buildings such as telephone exchange stations, booster or pressure regulating stations, wells, and plumbing stations, elevated tanks, lift stations and electrical power substations, provided no building shall be located within 50' from any lot line of an abutting lot in an ”R" District. Prior to granting such permit it shall be found that the architectural design of service structures is compatible to the neighborhood in which it is to be located and thus will promote the general welfare. Public service structures as defined above that have been approved by the City at required public hearings for public improvement projects shall not require a conditional use permit but such structures shall be subject to all other appropriate standards set forth in this section; amendments to approved plans involving design and/or placement of these structures will require written notice by Ae City to all affected property owners 14 days prior to the adoption of die amended plans by the Council. Personal wireless services and commercial broadcasting antennas and towers shall not be considered public service structures. Source: Ordinance 29,2nd Series Adopted: 2-23-87 Source: Ordinance No. 161,2nd Series Effective Date: 5-27-97 E. Greenhouses. Commercial greenhouses provided all outside storage is fenced in such a manner so as to screen the stored material from view when observed from the public street or adjoining lot. Commercial greenhouse structures shall not be located in a required yard area, and are subject further to the general zoning code requirements pertaining to accessory structures. Source: Ordinance 72,2nd Series Adopted: 8-14-89 ORONO CC 280 (4-1-84) .i § 10.20 F. Recreation Areas. Private gun clubs, archery ranges, ski slides, provided the area is fenced and no part of the principal use is less than 150 feet from any lot line. Source: Ordinance 26,2nd Series Adopted: 7-14-86 G. Guest Houses & Non-rental Guest Apartments. 1) Guest Houses. A separate dwelling constructed on an existing undivided lot for the sole use of the occupants of the principal buildings, including their domestic employees or their non-paying guests. All regular lot requirements shall be met by the guest house. Source: Ordinance 29,2nd Series Adopted: 2-23-87 2) Non-rental Guest Apartments. An apartment within the principal residence structure on a lot for the sole use of the occupants of the principal residence, including their domestic employees or non-paying guests. There shall be at least one access door to the apartment from within the principal structure, and such door shall be the primary access to the apartment. Application for such a guest apartment shall address the concerns of parking, sewage treatment, entryway and interior access method. Such apartments shall not have utilities metered separately from the principal residence utilities and shall not have a separate street address. Source: Ordinance 29,2nd Series Adopted: 2-23-87 H. Planned Residential Development. Limited to detached single family dwellings only and subject to the limitations of Section 10.32. I. Duplex Credit One duplex may be located on a single lot as a condition^ use upon application therefor provided diat public samtary sewer service is available, and the lot is adjacent to a commercial or industrial district, or within (25(0 two hundred fifty feet of the B-3 District, and the duplex is constructed within 200 feet of the commercial or industrial district A duplex is defined as a two-family unit residential building. Source: Ordinance 178,2nd Series Adopted: 12-8-97 J. Apiaries. ORONO CC 280-1 (4-1-84) 1 - f ^ ( ■t i § 10.20 K. Antenna Structure. One independent-antetma atfuetere with antenna or nf imtetiBQ attflched thereto^ subordinate to and 8Cfvicinp the pnnetpalu9C-or stroetufe on the same lot and-eu3tomaril>' incidental thereto that is not attached to another structure provided the-height -of the antenna-struetttfe docs not exceed 65 feet and the-antenna strueturc is set back from any -lot line a dtatanec at-leaat equal to the total height of the antenna stnieturc: Source: Deleted via Ordinance 161,2nd Series Effective Date: 5-27-97 L. Farms (Crop and stock). Provided that the area is ten or more acres. M. Animals. The keeping of domestic animals for non-commercial purposes including horses for the use of the occupants of tlie premises. A minimum of one acre in aggregate, exclusive of one acre for the principal building, must be available for each animal umt, except as hereinafter set forth. A minimum of two acres of open pasture must be available for a single horse and one additional acre must be available for each additional horse. When the horses are kept stabled and do not require pasture for feed purposes, the minimum pasture requirement may be adjusted at the discretion of the Council. Such minimum pasture acreage shall not include low lying lands unusable for pasture or grazing. Any person keeping such animals must comply with the provisions of the City Code. N. Stables and Bams - Private. The use of an accessory building for keeping animals for non-commercial purposes provided it is for the non-commercial use of the property owner or resident and meets the available area standards outlined in Paragraph M of this subsection. Further, no such stmeture shall be located less than 150 feet from the nearest adjacent residence and no closer than 75 feet from the nearest lot line. O. Stables and Bams - Public. The use of accessory buildings or land for the storage or rearing of anunals not owned by the property owner or resident. Such must meet the requirements of Section 10.03, Subdivision 18. Further, no such structure shall be located less than 150 feet from the nearest lot line. P. Riding Academy. Any such instmetion maintained as an accessory use and conducted by the owner shall meet the requirements of Sections M, N and 0 of this subdivision and no such instruction shall occur less than 100 feet from an adjacent residence or less than 75 feet from the nearest lot line. Source: Ordinance 26,2nd Series Adopted: 7-14-86 ORONO CC 280-2 (4-1-84) § 10.20 M. Antenna Stnietufc. 0»? independent antenna otnietufc with antenna-of combination of antenna attached thereto, subordinate to and 9er\'ieir.g the prineipoHiac or structure on the flomc lot and cu3tomarily incidental thereto that is not attached to another structure provided the height of the antenna stfuctufc does not exceed bSfeet ond the antenna jtruetufe-ia set back from any lot line a distance at least equal to the total height of the antenna atnieturc. Source; Ordinance No. 177 Effcctiv e^ate^ 6-5-75 Source: Deleted via Ordinance 161,2nd Series Effective Date: 5-27-97 Q. Plumbing in Accessory Building. The provision of a toilet, bathtub or shower in an accessory building. Approval shall be conditioned on provision of municipal sanitary sewer or a conforming sewage treatment system designed to handle the anticipated flows from the building plumbing. Approval shall be granted only when the following criteria are met: 1. The Council finds that the proposed use of the accessory structure with plumbing will not be detrimental to the residential character of the neighborhood. 2. The Council finds that the plumbing fixtures proposed are in keeping with the intended use of the accessory building. 3. The property is 2.0 acres in area or larger. 4. The accessory building is conforming in location, size and height. 5. The property owner agrees to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property providing that: a. the accessory building will not be used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by City or if allowed by City code. b. the accessory building will not be used as a dwelling unless a guest house CUP is obtained. c. the accessory building will not be rented, leased or otherwise provided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances. Source: Ordinance No. 179,2nd Series Adopted: 10-12-98 ORONO CC 280-3 (4-1-84) 'i § 10.20 Subd. 4. Accessory Uses. Within any "R-1 A" One Family Residential District, no accessory structure or use of land shall be permitted except for one or more of the following uses: A. Garages. Private garages and parking space. B. Pools, etc. Private swimming pool, tennis courts, and paddocks. C. Home Occupations. Any gainful occupation meeting all of the following requirements when engaged in only by persons residing in their dwelling, when there is no employed assistant, when that occupation is conducted within the principal structure only, when evidence of the occupation is not visible from the street, no signs other than those permitted in ”R" Districts are present, no excessive stock in trade is stored on the premises, over the counter retail sales are not involved, the entrance to the home occupation is gained from within the structure, and the use does not adversely affect the character of the uses permitted in the district in which it is located. A professional person may use his residence for consultation, emergency treatment or performance of religious rites but not for general practice of his profession when such general practice will involve the need for more than three off-street parking spaces for the occupant and visitors. D. Signs. Signs as regulated in the Zoning Chapter. E. Temporary Structures. Buildings temporarily located for purposes of constructing on tiie premises for a period not to exceed time necessary for such constructing. F. Gardens, etc. Gardening and other horticultural uses including aviaries and decorative landscape features. G. Roadside Stands. One roadside stand offering for sale only farm products produced on the premises provided that such stand does not exceed 200 square feet in area and that it is located at least thirty feet back from the public right-of-way. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 H. Communication Reception/Transmission Devices. 1. Accessory Antennas. Accessory antennas shall be lumted to radio and television receiving anteimas, satellite dishes, TVRO's, and amateur short-wave radio transmitting and receiving anteimas. Accessory antennas that are accessory to the principal use of the property are permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts provided they meet the following conditions: ORONO CC 281 (4-1-84) I § 10.20 a. Height. A ground mounted accessory antenna shall not excedd twenty (20) feet in height from ground level. b. Yards. Accessory antennas shall not be located within the required front yard setback, comer side yard setback or side yard setback abutting a street. c. Roofs. If vegetation or obstmctions interfere with satellite signals at a location in any allowable placement area, the accessory antenna may be placed on the roof of any authorized stmcture on the premises. d. Accessory antennas shall not be located within a required yard or setback area or within drainage or utility easements. Antenna towers shall be set back from adjacent property lines a horizontal distance no less than the maximum height of the antenna. e. Building Permits. A building permit shall be required for the installation of any accessory antenna requiring a conditional use permit. Building permit applications shall be accompanied by a site plan and structural component data for the accessory ante nna, including details of anchoring. The Building Official must approve the plans before installation. f. Lightning Protection. Each accessory antenna shall be grounded to protect against natural lightning strikes in conformance with the National Electrical Code as adopted by the City of Orono. g. Electrical Code. Acessoiy antenna electrical equipment and connections shall be designed and installed in conformance with the National Electrical Code as adopted by the City of Orono. h. Color/Content. Accessory antennas shall be of a neutral color and shall not be used as signage. 2. Amateur Short-Wave Radio Antennas and Towers which do not meet the conditions for accessory antennas, may be allowed with a conditional use permit in all zoning districts provided they meet the following conditions: a. Height When an amateur short-wave radio antenna is mounted on an antenna tower, the total height of the antenna and tower shall not exceed 65 feet. b. Yards. Amateur short-wave radio antennas and ^wers shall not be located within a front comer side or side yard. ORONO CC 281-1 (4-1-8!) J i r«ict ^Olt T § 10.31 E. There shall be no setback exceptions permitted that reduce any required setback to less than 10 feet. F. There shall be no setback exceptions permitted for any horizontal building addition or hardcover increase of any kind within 75 feet of the shoreline or within 26 feet of any-- wetland. G. There shall be no setback exceptions permitted without a Council approved variance in cases where any existing building is being replaced by a new building, or where the proposed addition, remodeling and/or renovation work constitutes 50 percent or more of the assessor ’s fair market value for the existing building. In these situations, the new work shall conform to all required setbacks. H. The exceptions authorized by this Subdivision apply only to setback requirements and do not authorize variance of any lot area, hardcover, building height, building area or any other zoning or building code performance standard. Subd. 19. Future Amendments. The "RS" District regulations adopted by this Section represent an iimovativc attempt to solve the unique problems relating to Ustoric use and- previously platted substandard lots on the islands while at the same time assuring the prope^ owners of continued reasonable use of their property. It may be found by subsequent City Coimcils that this Section was not restrictive enough to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens and that new development potential granted to property owners by this Section may have to be modified. Therefore, no new development rights granted by this Section shall be deemed to be vested property rights but shall remain subject to future modification by the City. Source: Ordinance No. 246 Effective Date: 1-13-83 SEC. 10.32 PRD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Subd. 1 . Purpose. This plan is available to land subdividers subject to Council approval, as alternative to standard minimum lot size subdivision of land. The purpose of this plan is to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation of natural open spaces, to counteract the effects of urban congestion and monotony, to provide cohesive structure to neighborhood design, to offer recreation opportunities close to home, and to aid in improving the welfare in general of City residents. ORONO CC 330 (4-1-84) 1 \ i § 10.32 Subd. 2. Submission of Plans. Land owners may submit land subdivision plans for any "R” District without adherence to minimum lot size requirements for each building lot, provided that the total number of building lots, or dwelling units, shall not exceed the number of such lots or units permissible under the minimum lot size requirements of the zoning district or districts in which such land is situated. Subd. 3. Council Discretion. The dw-elling units permitted may be, at the discretion of the Council and subject to the conditions set forth by the Council, in detached, attached or multiple family dwelling structures; subject to the limitations provided for in each zoning district. Subd. 4. Open Space, Etc. The dedication, ownership, use and maintenance of open spaces created by the application of the Planned Residential Development shall be subject to conditions deemed necessary by the Council to assure the preservation of such open spaces for then- intended purposes. Subd. 5. Dedication of Open Space. The dedication and ownership of such open spaces may be through: (1) Homeowners Association; (2) Landlord Maintenance; (3) Special Service District; (4) Municipal Ownership; or (5) any other method deemed appropriate by the Council to accomplish the purposes of this plan. Subd. 6. Site Plan. The proposed site plan, including location, spacing and basic design of proposed buildings, street and parking plans, water and sewer (public or private) plans, and plans of open space available for park or recreational purposes, shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Coimnission and the Council. Subd. 7. Hearings. The Council may direct that a public hearing be held to review such plans. Subd. 8. Final Approval. Final approval shall not be granted until all conditions set by the Council are met; and, further the Council shall not approve any such Planned Residential Development prior to the legally binding establishment of the open space dedication, ownerehip and maintenance provisions, such provisions to be guaranteed by bonding or other means satisfactory to the Council. A Subd. 9. Subdivision Requirements. All provisions of subdivision procedure established by the City Code except as moihfied herein above, shall govern applications under this plan. Source: Municipal Code Effective Date: 9-14-67 (Sections 10.33 through 10.39, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) ORONO CC 331 (4-1-84) i r coiiwr.n ik*FET\NQ AUG 0 9 »999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: August 4,1999 CU Y ur OHONO Item No.: ( O Department Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaflroa Title: Senior Planning Coordinator AdmAdministrator Approval:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: DNR Conveyance of Luce Line Tract to Longridge Associates List of Exhibits A - Plat Map B - Sketch of Parcel to be Conveyed C - Correspondence Pending Conveyance The DNR determined that a portion of the south half of the Luce Line right-of-way west of the Orono Golf Course was in fact owned by Longridge Associates. Longridge Associates agreed to deed the trail right-of-way to DNR in exchange for conveyance to Longridge of a portion of the Trail right-of-way further east, adjacent to the Orono Orchard Road bridge. The portion to be conveyed to Longridge is now (and will continue to be) used by DNR and the public as a walking/driving access to the trail; DNR will be retaining an easement over the strip for these purposes. Longridge already owns a strip of land between the Orono Golf Course and the Luce Line (see Exhibits A and B). The conveyance gives Longridge additional frontage on Orono Orchard Road adjacent to the bridge. DNR Exempt From Subdivision Regulations DNR is claiming exemption from compliance with Orono Zoning Code requirements in this matter, and had discussed this with Liz Van Zomeren earlier this year. City Attorney Tom Barrett concurs that the City cannot require DNR to comply with our subdivision requirements. Hennepin County will eventually request confirmation of City approval of this division before their maps and tax records are changed. Therefore, staff is requesting authority to advise the County that the City will not oppose this 'lot line rearrangement subdivision'. Additionally, it is important that the County and Longridge be advised that the conveyed parcel should be legally combined with the adjacent Longridge parcel to avoid the creation of what someone might perceive as a buildable lot. f r \ I DNR/Longridge Conveyance August 4,1999 Page 2 ( I Future Use of Conveyed Parcel The conveyed parcel consists of a 20'-30' high embankment split by a steep driveway, plus flat land above it adjacent to the Trail. Due to the configuration of Orono Orchard Road and the steep banks, this is not a safe location for a driveway access that would have vehicles exiting on a regular basis. Longridge may be contemplating use of this for future access to their land west of the golf course. The City has advised Longridge in the past that this is not an acceptable access for their land west of the golf course. It is important that Ae City's position on this be strongly reinforced in relation to the conveyance. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Authorize staff to advise the County that the City will not contest the division as long as legal combination occurs. Direct staff to advise Longridge of City concerns regarding use of this parcel for vehicular access to Orono Orchard Road. ITY OF OWNO ® 6124730510 02/23/99 13:07 0:03/05 NO: S tate of Minnesota OFFICE OF THE ATTOKNEY (iENERAL MIKE HATCH UnilKlif <»!NIIUL January 22.1999 mnm 4tfWlNNUOrAITUXT arnuuMHiMM-mr nurNO»Ft(«iiiiiriiTi EliaMlMath Zontvivn 2onins AdninistMEtOK Chy ofOrono City H«ll F.O. Box Otofto, Mianesett SS323 Res State Sale of Surplit* Land DMT Ms. Van Zomeren: With regards to the above matter, the State of Minnesota, pursuant to Minn. Stal. parcel. Enclosed please find a map which shows in cross-hatch the State tract which >viU be conveyed to Longridge Associates. The legal description of the property is as fbllows: A parcal of land located in the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter. Section 2. Township 117 North. Range 23 West. Hennepin County, Mlnn^t^ described as follows; Commencing at a point on the west line of satd Sutton 2 which Is the intersection of the southerly right of way line of the Minnesota Western Railway Company and the said west line of said Section 2; thence in a norcheoscerly direction parallel with and 57 feet southeasterly from the center line of the main track of the Minnesota Westetn Railway Company meast^d at right angles therefrom for a distance of 873 feet to the point of beginning; Aence southeasterly at right angles to the previously described lino a distance of 43 feet; thence northeasterly at right angles to the last described line a distance of 180 more or less, to the center line of the Long Lake-Orono road so-called, which point is lOO feet somheasterly of the center line of the said main track measur^ at right angles therefrom; thence along the said center Jixte of the said road in a northwesterly direction to a point which is 57 feet southeasterly from ihc center line of the said main track measured at right angles therefrom; thence in a southwesterly direction parallel with the said center line of main track a distance of 170 fbet; more or less, to the point of beginning. I'j,.r.51 » 2VT-4I »v» • TTY- JVft. IJ M> • T.'tl f*v* Lmcft. «M0m t»5707J*7 « 12 «TTV* • W» x« C^W^ «rw...x-..uy Wh.. VV.UW, O.. c ____ O U 3« x r . CITY OF ORONO i 6124730510 02/23/99 13:07 0 :04/05 N j^izabeth Van Zpmeten Janiuiy 22,1999 Page2 As the State s eanveyailce is one of several transactions which will he taking place pursuant to an agreement, it is important that there are no impediments to making the conveyance and placing the same of record. The conveyance by fhc State is less dian the whole trail parcel which ia owned by the State. While there may be state and local condUions/rcstrictions on such a subdivision, it has always been the position of thia office that such controls have no application to the State of Minnesota. The purpose of this letter is to receive conflsiziation ftom you ttol neither such state nor local controls wilt affect thia conveyance. 1 would ask that you please review dte above discussion and conflim for me that the State conveyance will not be delayed for any reason associated with a transfer of less than the 0¥vner*s whole parcel. If I can answer any questions, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Thank you fbr your cooperation and urtderstanding in this regard. Very truly yours. BkUCTA. SPECKTOR Assistant Attorney Oenerol (651)296^96 Enclosure ce;Patrick M. O'Connor Charles Catpenter. Esq. Jill Crowspn, DNR/BREM •H Aa;17734t vl CITr Of ORONO f 6124730510 02/25/99 .13:07 0 : 02/05 N • 4 • S tate of Minnesot OFFICK OF THE Al’rOKNEY CKNmi. MIKK HATIH ATIDKWV liUlUHl Februaiy 18,1999 M$Mi4iKfWtrr4mnr Elizabeth Van Zomeren Zoning Adniinistmtor C'ity of Orono City Hall P.O. Box 66 Orono. MinnttMOta 55323 ,^6 / ‘f- He; State Sale of Surplus L>an4 , l.ungridge Associates Dear Ms. Von Zomeren: With regards to the «bov«;-rt?rer«nccJ t iattcr, I refer you to my correspondence of January 22. 1999. u c*>py of which is enclosed. Please advise us l*> whether or not local controls will afleet the conveyance since it is less than the owner's whc»le parcel. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yoursi BRUCE A. SPECKTOR Assistant Attorney Oeneral (651) 296-0696 BncluKurc Ari'tt<n04 vi 1 1 1 ■ |'a.%tm<l*-Ov<i>2'i7-«»»v*rrr S'm, ■•io* w l4<*o»; tW*n 65T .'7H7 i v.»uv>. tWWi *frf..tt(|jfnVi« w<*w.n« >Uitc.i»ii«k » Itqual l'«0|4**yc» W1 ”’ V,<J»H’» |V». ...1^ .m •ci^yvK'd paper ( pint v«K».Vt»Klf v’« T-29-1999 9s05AM FROM DNR SW AREA OFFICE 612 S26 676T P. 5 CITY Of ORONO f 6124730510 02/23/99 13:07 S:01/05 N0:677 1 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: ^ TIME; r.oo pfv% TO; AT; p>0|^ PHONE; ^ “7 PAX: '^<^Co-' FROM:El£ VAN 20MEREN CITY FLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF ORONO PHONE: 612-249-^29 FAX:612-249>4616 Narob*r of Page* Following Cover Sh««t;J^ NOTES: CdY'C^ (bo^p4x^ /u4?/tcr ^3&rvic^ l^r’^ecfor OwMcf tf<?M aJbocAJ- 'HniH VJe^e, qoo OM>ar^ Avoc. f Ct Wc MtMilloArt dire, surprised pa^c/U turrit rdie yeJ S-HiU Slu ^/i/^ laun^. (SK.'t ' ^ -h\^ L mla . -h^oAp ^ paxaU hi Qj^jOche^ ^rxoihex potxh -HKJr- li^ yK>6.f-^‘ hy\CJj JiA^A cutt*J hb p**^ A. dr/ve^yiay in -HCt, . ' Mc*. ou^ ^/>»7 vf f/x idsh 729/99 .14:24 FAX 651 297 4169 ATTY GENERAL/900 @001 MEMORANDUM TO FILE RE:Luce Line Trail I Longridge ]>AT£: FROM: Fcbmary 25, 195$ Brace A. Specktor On February 25, 1999,1 foUo'wed up on my letter of February 18, 1999, to lA:c Van Zomeran about the applicability of Qrono's local ordinances to the planned state conveyance to X^onsridge. Liz explained that she saw no problem and agreed that the city would not need to approve the conveyance. I advised her that I had also heard from Heimepin Coimty Taxpayer Services on this issue and that they saw no problem and would create the subdivision. She said that she would like the planning department to be aware of this matter and involved in any development of die site by Longridge. She mentioned the issue of the driveway from Orono Orchard Road and that how the city is very interested in this. I assured Liz that the state would keep the oily to- date on how this matter is proceeding and that she should continue to woric widi Martha Reger on -trail issues. pestrlf Fax Note 7S71 rrotn Co,/DBpl. prvone# •1 , T-29-1999 9*G5AM FROM DNR SW AREA OFFICE 612 S26 6T6T P. 6 r T-2Q-1QSQ 9:QSAH FROM DNR SW AREA OFFICE 612 S2S 6T6T p. a • • EXHIBIT r 0 -to -liiMvl CUI^VI yj4^Vv\ an .' . !*\ \ access, ^ ^ ■--* c»><^3'S ^vs> AUG 0 9 W99 cut or- UrtONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 9,1999 ITEM NO.: j j Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Old Beach Road Cul-dfi^Sac Streetlight Street Lighting Areas We have received a letter requesting the installation of a street light at the Old Beach Road cul-de- sac from the residents who live next to the cul-de-sac. Attached you will find a listing of street lights in the City obtained from NSP. The attached map shows the approximate locat ors of areas with street lights in the City. The two main areas with street lights are in the Cast-o Point and Navarre neighborhoods, and the Highway 12 commercial area. Several smaller densely developed neighborhoods such as Crystal Bay and Hackberry Hill also have street lights. Most of the City does not have street lights. I receive very few requests for street lights. Occasionally, I receive calls from residents in the rural areas asking about street lights. When I explain that most residents prefer the rural atmosphere, without street lights, they do not pursue the issue any further. Street Light Installation and Operation Costs The City is currently paying for the operating costs of street lights under the General Fund Public Works budget. The monthly bill from NSP for street lighting is approximately $1,200. There are 68 street lights owned by NSP. The monthly cost per light varies from $8.85 to $14.75 depending on the size. Most of the lights are 100 watts at $8.85 per month. Most of the NSP owned lights are in the Navarre residential and Casco Point areas. There are also 56 City owned lights for which we are billed for electricity. NSP replaces light bulbs in these street lights as part of the monthly electricity fee. The only light bulbs the City replaces are for the traffic signals along Highway 12. The installation dates and who paid for most of the street lights is unclear, except the newer decorative lights along Shoreline Drive in the Navarre business district. These were installed in 1990 and the costs were assessed to the property owners over a ten year period. A reasonable assumption is that there were probably older street lights in this area that were replaced by the newer decorative lights. From 1968 to 1985 there were annual assessments to property owners for street light operating costs. These assessments varied depending on the number of people served by each street light. We can not find records of any assessments for the installation of street lights besides the Navarre business district street lights. It is possible that there could be some street lights on private roads, in the rural area, which are being maintained by property owners or homeowner's associations. We do not maintain any records of street lights on private roads, but there are not many street lights in the rural areas of the City. Survey of Street Lighting Policies from Neighboring Cities Staff was unable to find any street lighting policies for the City of Orono, and have surveyed area cities regarding their street lighting policies. Twelve surveys were sent out and we have received responses from five cities; Long Lake, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Mound, and Spring Park. The surveys returned represent a good sample of different size cities. Minnetonka is the only city that returned a written street light policy with the survey form. Copies of the survey forms are attached. All of the cities pay the operating costs for standard street lights from the General Fund. Minnetonka requires neighborhood funding for decorative lights. Orono is currently paying for street light operating costs from the General Fund. NSP owns the 95% to 100% of the street lights for all of the cities, except Spring Park where NSP owns 70% of the street lights. In Orono NSP owns 55% of the street lights. City policies vary for the funding of new street light installations in existing neighborhoods In all surveyed cities, for new developments the developer pays for the street light installation. Long Lake, Mound, and Spring Park pay for the installation of new street lights in existing neighborhoods. In Long Lake if a different style light is requested, the neighborhood pays for installation. In Minnetonka, the benefitted property owners will normally be required to assume any cost over $500 for installation of a new street light. Minnetonka has a written policy regarding ciiteria for the placement of street lights. Excerpts from vieir policy are listed below. Backgrorji*d The City of Minnetonka provides street lighting of various types to promote safe travel on City streets of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The City provided street lighting is not intended for the purpose of deterring criminal activity. .Standard Street Lighting The City Engineer shall consider the authorization of placing street lights in the City only at intersections, end of cul-de>sacs, at sharp turns or steep hills along City streets, or the entrance to or within publicly-owned parking facilities, except when the strict application of such criteria would not be in the best interest of residents of the City. In such instances, an alternative location may be approved. All of the Cities notify area residents when the installation of new street light is considered. We have notified the residents in the Old Beach Road area that the installation of a street light will be discussed at this Council meeting. Old Beach Road Street Light The residents have requested a street light because of safety concerns with school buses and the public trail that connects the cul-de-sac to County Road 19. Also, there have been problems with occupied vehicles parked in this area and illegal dumping. Recommendations on Street Light Installation Staffs recommendation is that the installation of a street light is warranted in this area. The main reason for this is the presence of pedestrian and bicycle traffic on the public trail linking the cul- de-sac to County Road 19. There are entrance guardrails on this trail to prevent motorized vehicle traffic from using the trail and these could be hazardous at night. This is an urban area of the City that does have street lights at other intersections. The City of Minnetonka street light policy lists cul-de-sacs has one of the areas where street lights can be installed. Recommendations for Funding Operation and Maintenance Costs If the Council concurs that a street light is warranted, decisions on funding of this street light will be required. Currently, the City is paying the operational costs for the other street lights in the City, which is typical of the area Cities surveyed. We are recommending that the City fund the operation for this street light, the same as all of the other street lights in the City, and similar to other area Cities funding of street light operational costs. Recommendations for Funding Installation Costs The Council must also decide who will pay for the installation of this street light, the property owner or the City. The approximate cost for a street ligh' is $1,500 depending on the location installed and distance from available power. Payment of installation costs for most of the older street lights in the City is unclear except the Navarre business district new decorative street lights. Three area cities pay for installation of new street lights in existing neighborhoods. In Minnetonka, the benefitted property owners will normally be required to assume any cost over $500 for installation of a new street light. The Council may want to consider directing staff to develop a written policy similar to the City of Minnetonka's policy regarding street lighting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Consideration of the request for a street light at the Old Beach Road cul-de-sac and recommendations on funding of the installation and operational costs. Alistair and Kristin laeqnes 2585 Old Beach Road Orono, Minnesota 55391 Home Phone 471-0450 June 02,1999 .JUii U 4 1999 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 To whom it may concern. We are wondering whether a street light could be placed in the cul-de-sac at Ihe end of old Beach Road. 6ur children get on and off school buses here, and sometimes must do so in the dark. Also, the public footpath which runs from this point to highway 19 would benefit from additional illumination. And, quite often, vehicles wait and/or are parked in this area (an old dish-washer was dumped there a couple of months ago). We think improved lighting would alleviate some of these issues. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 6- VMISUCMC DEHCE TRSn V OUND 4800 4400 iS?!" MEDINA iepo> L.jo<L-4.Wu-K,> & sst?" ■ Ii I )NQ LAKE (I 1 "D «M Uit 0 mrzoA 't I // \ 4000 N 3200 2800 waL*«« 2400 LMf N»€IQ»«A T 2000 1600 / 1200 Liaoo V' rrtiTMOlJflr?•• ] 800 ■>400 •«xw • ., 6 ArfUdViM/stf ^ AUfA^ LMUPk r^Sl^ r r>f Omnn ^ Minn Aerify OLD B^ACW R.0W> CUL-Df-SAC U^Ts-ET"T;lioooii aAk fi2Sl!S9: r«-* north rrCT REPORT NOI MV275B DATEt 03/03/98 t RPLS—ROADWAY AND PROTECTIVE LIGHTING SYSTEM ^^*^^AREA^^”SlNNETONKA **^^^CONTRACT CODEi ORNO PAGEi 131 AX WN PAY L LAMP 1ST CD t CD T SIZE BR' SD UNIT NUMBER L . . . . . . .STREET INFO C AR CODE ADDRESS P INSTALL C DATE PMS NUMBER f • • •• R RT S GRP - • •* -.V • • «•> . • • • * p —. VLT M CL * ’#• ’• . • • • • * . . * • • <• -DATES-— RL MAINT A 120 W 0 96 96090* ■ A ;■120 W 0 96 96090:« ^ A 120 W 0 ,96 960912 A 120 W 0 96 960912 A 120 W .0 96 960912 A 120. W 0 96 960912 A 120 W 0 96 960912 A 120 W 0 96 960912 A 120 W 0 .96 960912 • A 120 W 0 96 960912 A ,120 W 0 96 960912 A 120 W 0 96 960912 A 120 W 0 96 960912 A 120 W 0 96.960912 • .A 120 W 0 96 960912 •A 120 W 0 96.960912 A 120 W 0 96 960912 A 120 W 0 96 960912 A 120 W 0 96 960912 • A 120 W 0 96 960831 A 120 W 0 96 960831 A 120 W 0 96 960912 A 120 W 0 96 960831 13901 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961- NSP 3961 NSP 3961 NSP 3961 NSP 3961 NSP 3961 NSP 3961 NSP 3961 NSP 3961 NSP 3961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP )3961 NSP >3961 NSP >3961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP >3961 NSP )3961 NSP )3961 NSP )3961 NSP )3961 NSP )3961 NSP )3961 NSP )3961 NSP ORNO S lOOW ORNO S lOOW ORNO S lOOW ORNO S lOOW ORNO S ORNO S ORNO S ORNO S ORNO S ORNO S ORNO S ORNO S ORNO S ORNO S ORNO S lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW ORNO S lOOW ORNO S lOOW ORNO S lOOW ORNO S lOOW ORNO S lOOW ORNO S lOOW ORNO S lOOW ORNO S lOOW ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO S S S S S S S S S S lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW lOOW )S961 NSP ORNO S lOOW AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN 6517D Y02 C 10 6510E U03 C 10 G520E N02 C 10 G520K R02 C 10 6520A C03 N 10 G520A 602 M 10 0520A LOl M 10 6520A.F04 M 10 6520A BOS M 10 6520A C07 M 10 6520G B02 C 10 6520J U06 M 10 6520J ROl C 10 G520F K03 M 10 G520F L07 C 10 G520E KOI M 10 G520E T06 M 10 G520E VOl M 10 6520D X09 C 10 6428D Y03 M 10 GA28D WOl M 10 6520J K07 M 10 6505C AOl C 10 0520A EOl M 10 G520B HOI M 10 O520B G02 M 10 G520B C02 M 10 G435C L06 M 10 GA27E X03 M 10 GA33J YOl L 10 6A33J X05 M 10 G433J XOl M 10 G517J Q02 C 10 G510D J02 M 10 554K 2345 BLAINE AVE 5884 LYRIC AVE 556K 1305 BROWN RD S 58NM SPATES AVE 5587 3721 CASCO AVE 5584 CAROLINE AVE 5587 3779 CASCO AVE 55J5 ETHEL AVE• 5588 3131 CASCO . CIR 5822 3195 CASCO CIR 5588 3227 CASCO CIR 5588 3243 CASCO CIR 5588 3287 CASCO CIR 5588 31450 CASCO CIR 558J 2474 CASCO POINT RD 55M2 FREDERICK ST 558J 2530 CASCO POINT RD 558J 2601 CASCO POINT RD 55GJ DUNWOODY AVE 558J 2665 CASCO POINT RD 558J 2745 CASCO POINT RD 5587 CASCO . AVE 558J 2845 CASCO POINT RD 558J 2927 CASCO POINT RD 558J 2990 CASCO POINT RD 558J 3125 CASCO POINT RD 5588 CASCO CIR 55CZ 797 CRYSTAL BAY RD 55CZ 800 CRYSTAL BAY RD 550J 2480 DUNWOODY . AVE ‘ 55LP 3575 FOX ST 58PX STUBBS BAY RD S 5822 3251 IVY th 5822 3466 IVY . PL . 5822 3535 IVY PL 5822 3560 IVY 550P 460 LONG LAKE RD . E 556J 1095 N BROWN . RD 58FL 371 N OLD CRYSTAL B RD 58FL 793 N OLD CRYSTAL B RD 3HJ2 521 N WILLOW DR 58C8 1120 NORTHSHORE DR 55J9 EAGERNESS POINT RD . 58C8 2285 NORTHSHORE DR P 87/08/04 P 87/08/10 P 87/07/29 P 87/07/29 P 87/07/27 P 87/07/26 P 87/07/27 P 87/07/28 P 87/07/16 P 87/07/27 P 85/02/11 P 87/07/15 P 87/07/15 P 87/07/29 P 87/07/29 P 87/07/29 P 87/07/28 P 87/07/28 P 87/07/27 P 88/11/11 P 88/11/11 P 87/07/29 P 87/07/23 P 87/07/28 P 87/07/28 P 87/07/28 P 87/07/16 P 84/10/30 P 88/11/11 P 87/07/20 P 87/07/20 P 87/07/20 P 87/08/10 .P 87/07/22 A A A A A A A A A A 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 W W W W W W W W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 96 96 96 96 97 96 96 96 96 96091: 96091: 960912 96091: 96083C 970602 970227 960O3( 961211 960912 120 W 97 97 970911 . . . < ■ . • •• * • • . % REPORT NOt MV275B DATEt 03/03/98 RPLS—ROADWAY AND- PROTECTIVE LIGHTING. SYSTEM PAGEt 132 rAX OWN t PAY L )IST CD I CD T STREET LIGHT BILLING — DETAILAREAt MINNETONKA CONTRACT CODEi ORNO % * .• . • • • • • 4 . LAMP BR SIZE SD UNIT NUMBER G508A W03 6508A JOS G508A BOA G507A K09 G507A EOA C AR CODE . STREET iNFO ADDRESS P INSTALL C • DATE PMS NUMBER R RT P- -DATES— S GRP VLT M CL RL • MAINT 13961 NSPi »3961 NSpI 13961 NSI 13961 NSPI 13961- risp 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 3961 NSP 3961 NSP 13961 NSP I396i NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP • 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP 13961 NSP • • • ORNO ORNO ORNOi ORNO ORNO S lOOW S lOOW S lOOW S lOOW S lOOW ORNO ORNO S lOOW S lOOW ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO S lOOW S.IOOW s ioow S lOOW S lOOW S lOOW S lOOW ORNO ORNO S lOOW S lOOW ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO S lOOW S lOOW S 150W S 150W ORNO ORNO S 150W S ISOW ORNO ORNO S 150W S 150W AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN C 10 58C8 3220 5556 C 10 58C8 3380 58RX C 10 58C8 3498 552M C 10 58C8 4201 NORTHSHORE BOHNS POINT NORTHSHORE TONKAWA NORTHSHORE BALDUR PARK NORTHSHORE DR RD DR RD DR RD DR C 10 G507E U09 G502J Kll M 10 C 10 58C8 4315 NORTHSHORE 58GT ' PARK 58C8 4455 NORTHSHORE 58GL 40 ORONO ORCHARD DR DR DR RD G521F MOl G517B C08 G517A QOl G521F J02 6502B G432A G431F F02 B04 C 10 C 10 C 10 C 10 C 10 C 10 58J5 58MJ 58RJ 58MJ 586H 58MJ 589D. 58MR 58VT 58V6 2799 2166 2308 2660 720 3580 PHEASANT SHADYWOOD TOGOSHADYWOOD LIVINGSTON SHADYWOOD MAPLE RIDGE SHORELINE WOODHILL*;atertown RD RD- RD. AVE RD LN DR RD . RD X03 C 10 G434F G425A T03 Y03 M 10 C 10 G517D G517D G505C G511E TT UT Q04 EOl C 10 C 10 C 10 C 10 58V6 4463 58N7 3MH2 2060 58N7 860 55JS 586H 3640 5884 5884 3655 WATERTOWN 006TH WAYZATA 006TH FERNDALE LIVINGSTON LYRIC LYRIC RD AVE BVD AVERD AVE AVE AVE N N G510E G433A T06 T04 M 10 C 10 G432G 0429D D02 ROl C 10 C 10 552Z 55GM 555T 58C8 556K55NV 588S 58SH 58PW 58SH 3382 1200 BAYSIDE RD E LAKE ST BRACKETTS POINT RD 1275 2425 3395 601 3810 NORTHSHORE BROWNHACKBERRY HILL MAPLE HWY 012 US • STUBBS BAY HWY 012 US DR RD P 88/11/11 P. 87/07/23 ** • P 87/07/07 P 87/07/07 P 87/08/07 P 87/07/10 P 87/07/23 P 87/07/22 P 84/02/21 P 81/01/11 P 87/07/22 P 87/07/23 P 88/11/11 P 87/07/20 P 86/11/11 P 88/11/11 C 90/11/26 STLTOROAAY C 90/11/26 STLTOROAAY • • ^ • P 87/07/14 P 87/07/22 87/08/06 P 87/07/20 s' P 87/07/14 P 88/11/11 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A C A A A A A •120 W 0 120. W‘ 0 120 W 0 120 W 0 120 W b 96 96 96 96 96 120 W 0 120 W 0 96 96 120 W 0 120 W 0 120 W b 120 W 0• * * 12b W 0 120 W 0 120 W 0 90 96 96 96 96 96 96 120 W 0 120 W 0 96 96 120 F 0• • ^ 120 F 0 • * •. • 120 W 0 120 W 0. 96 96 96 96 120 W 0. 120 W O 96 96 120 W.D 120 W 0 96 96 96090 96090 96090 96090 96090 96090 96091 96091: 96090: 97040: 96091: 96090' 960831 960831 960501 961213 96090* 96090* 96083( 960904 960902960B3( 96083( 96083C % REPORT MOI MV275B DATEI 03/03/98. RPLS—RbADWAY AND PROTECTIVE LIGHTING SYSTEM ; • . . • • .**.PAOEt 133 . “"contract CODE. ORMO 0 • • JWluflp FAX (m PAY )IST CD. CD L T LAMP SIZE BR SD UNIT NUMBER C AR CODE STREET INFO ADDRESS P INSTALL PMS C DATE NUMBER • . ' * • • • * *. . * ' B pT- p ---”DATES““*, S GRP VLT M CL.RL MAIM!^ D3961 NSPi ORMO S 150W 03961 NSPI ORNO S 150M 03961 MSPl ORNO S 150W 03961 NSPi ORNO S 150M 03961 NSPI ORMO S 150W 03961 NSPI ORNO S 150W 3961 NSPI ORMO S 150W 3961 MSP 1 ORMO S 150W 03961 NSP 03961 NSP ORNO S 150U ORNO S 150U AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN O510D W03 6510E VOl 6S08D ROZ 6507A Y03 O506D U03 6517A K08 6502B COS 6502D P0<i 6510B.C08 G517E S03 2224 C 10 58C8 275 584V C 10 58C0 2120 556K C 10 58C8 3768 CO 006 NORTHSHORE LAKEVIEW ^ NORTHSHORE BROWNNORTHSHORE C 10 58CB 58C2 C 10 58FM 55LP C 10 58MJ 5539 C 10 5BMR 55JT C 10 58MR 3MBC C 10 5BMR 5BNM C 10 5V8W 4005 2801 2294 820 1425 1958 2000 NORTHSHORE N ARM FOXSHADYWOOD BAYVIEW ^ SHORELINE FERNDALE SHORELINE ORONO ORCHARDS SHORELINE SPATES ^ SHORELINE RD DR P 87/07/22 • A.• • • 120 W 97 97 .97091 . AVE DR P 87/08/06 • * A • • 120 W O. 96 96091 • RD S ' DR P 87/08/07 • A , 8 120 WO 96 9609( • * • ^ • . * DR P 87/07/07 •• •■ A ■ . * • • 120 W 0 .96 9609C • DR . BAY RD P 87/07/14 ■ . A-.120 W 0 97 96082 • ST RD P 87/08/11 1 ‘ • : A ‘120 W 0 .96 9609C • * •• PL DR P 87/07/22 • ‘-A::' • * 120 W 97 97 97102 RD W . DR P 87/07/14 • •. A .120 W 0 96 96091 • • RD DR AVE DR p 87/07/23 P 87/07/10 A A 120 W 97 97 120 W 0 96 971Z0 96091 5961•NSP 5961 NSP 5961 NSP 5961 ORN< ORNO S 150W ORNO S 150W ORNO S 150M ORNO S 200W AN AN AN AN ML G50BB XBBl 0508B KBBZ G508B XBB3 SH12 3590 M 10 M 10 M 10 C 10 0»61 ORH<AoRMO S ZOOW am ml SHU S595 C 10 03961 03961 03961 03961 03961 03961 03961 03961 03961 03961 03961 03961 03961 03961 ORNOIORNO ORNOlORNO ORNOl ORNO ORNOlORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO NSP ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNOlORNO ORNO|ORNO ORNOlORNO 03961 ORNoV)RMO S 250W ZOOW ZOOW ZOOW ZOOW ZOOW 200W ZOOW ZOOW 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W OCBR OCBR W W W W W WG520J CR19 CR19 CR19 CR19 CR19 600 400 2680 2720 2800 2801 2831 2861 U02 100 105 110 115 120 M M M M M M M M M M M M M C 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 58C9 58C9 58C9 58SH 58N7 5BSH 58N7 58FL 58FM 58V7 58V7 58V7 5BV7 58V7 58V7 558J 58C8 58CB 58C8 5BCB 5BC8 3370 3370 3370 3590 3595 US US 600 400 2680 2720 2800 2801 2831 2861 2535 100 105 110 115. 120 N SHORE N SHORE N SHORE HWY 012 006TH HWY 012 006TH N OLD CRYSTAL B OLD CRYSTAL BAY W WAYZATA ; W WAYZATA W WAYZATA W WAYZATA W WAYZATA W WAYZATA CASCO POINT NORTHSHORE NORTHSHORE NORTHSHORE NORTHSHORE NORTHSHORE DR DR DR AVE N H 97/05/20 STLTOROAAY 97/05/20 STLTOROAAY 97/05/20 STLTOROAAY 0 84/08/01 C C C B 1 A 0 A 0 A 0 120 M 0 97 97 97 96 9712C 9712C 96080 0 84/08/01 B 1 120 MO 96 96080 AVE RD RD DVD BVD BVD BVD BVD BVD RD DR DR DR, DR DR 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 P 87/07/23 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 B 1 B 1 < B 1 B 1 B 1 B 1 B 1 B 1 A B 1 B 1 D 1 B 1 B 1 120 M 0 120 M 0 120 M 0 120 M 0 120 M 0 120 M 0 120 M 0 120 M O .120 W 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 96080 96080 9608C 960SC 96080 96080 960B0 96080 96091 96072 96121 96* 9612] 96 96072 96 96072 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 .96 96 96 AN ML. CR19 125 M 10 58C8 125 NORTHSHORE ’0 88/11/11 B 1 HO 96 9607J L__ ♦ - ♦ * / REPORT NOt MV^75B DATEt 03/03/98 RPLS—ROADWAY AND PROTECTIVE LIGHTING SYSTEM PAGE: 134.; STREET LIGHT BILLING — DETAIL AREAi MINNETONKA CONTRACT CODEt ORNO . .* rAX II ST OWN CD d PAY CD L T LAMP SIZE BR SD UNIT NUMBER C AR CODE STREET INFO ADDRESS P INSTALL C DATE PMS NUMBER R RT P- -DATES— S GRP VLT M CL RL MAINT 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 13961 >3961 13961 13961 )3961 13961 )3961 >3961 >3961 >3961 >3961 >3961 >3961 ORN ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNOf ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO lORNO ORNO bRNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO ORNO S S S S S S Ssssssssssssssssssssssssss V V V V V V V 25 OW 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 25 OW 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 250W 400W 400W 400W •400W 400W 400W 400W AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN AN ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML- ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML ML CR19 CR19 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 CR15 L L L L L L L 130 135 565 570 575 580 585 590 595 600 605 610 615 620 625 630 635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 695 700 705 710 3389 P 3*01 P 3403 P 3429 P 3459. P 3469 P 3471 P M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 10 58C8 10 58C8 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 58MR 58MR 58MR 58MR 58MR 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 10 58MR 58MR 58MR 58MR 58MR 58MR 58MR 58MR 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 130 135 565 570 575 580 585 590 595 600 605 610 615 620 625 630 635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 695 700 705 710 3389 3401 3403 3429 3459 3469 3471 NORTHSHORE NORTHSHORE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE SHORELINE DR DR DR DR DR DR DR DR DR DR DR DR DR DR DR DR DR 0 0 0 0 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 88/11/11 88/11/11 88/11/11 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/n/ll 0 88/:i/ll 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 0 88/11/11 D B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B 1 ■} 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 120 120 120 120 M M M M M M M M N M M M 0 0 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 96 96 98 M 98 M 98 M 98 96072 96072 98020 98 98020 98 98020 98 . 98020 98 98020 98 98020 98 98020 98 98020 98 98020 98 98020> 98 98020> 98 98020< 98 980201 N 98 98 980201 M 98 -98 980201 M 98 98 980201 98020)DR 088/11/11 B 1;• • M 98 98 ..DR 0 88/11/11 B 1 M 98 98 DR 0 88/11/11 B 1 • ;m 98 98 DR 0 88/11/11 B 1 M 98 98 DR •0 88/11/11 B 1 M 98 98 ■ DR 0 88/11/11 B 1 . H 98 98 DR 0 88/11/11 B 1 .M 98 98 DR 0 88/11/11 B 1 M 98 98 DR 088/11/11.B 1 M 98 98 DR 0 88/11/11 B 1 M 98 98 DR 0 88/11/11 B 1 M 98 98 DR 0 88/11/19 B 1 M 98 98 DR 0 88/11/11 B 1 M 98 98 . DR 0 88/11/11 B 1 120 M 98 98 DR 0 86/11/11 B 1 120 M 98 98 DR 0 '86/11/11 B 1 120 M 98 98 DR 0 88/11/11 B 1 120 M 98 98 . DR 0 86/11/11 B 1 120 M 98 98 DR 0 88/11/11 B 1 120 M 98 98 DR ■0 86/11/11 B 1 120 M 98 98 DR 0 86/11/11 B 1 120 M.98 98 98020) JUL-29-1993 16:12 CITY OF hlHHETONKA 612 939 8244 P.02/03 \A vy Ki 11 <) M piAc: COUNCIL tOLlCY 1-14 ENT OF STREET LIGHTING EFFECTIVE DATE: March 1, 1986 COUNCIL PQT.TCV DM PLACEMENT OF STREET LIGHTING The purpose of this directive is to set out the policy of the Citv Council concerning the placement of street lighting in the city of ninn^uonjca • Background m The City of Minnetonka provides street lighting of various types to streets of vehicular and pedestrian City provided street lighting is not intended for the purpose of deterring criminal activity. STATEMENT OF POLICY Applicability ^is Polity is applicable to all requests for the installation of street lighting to be provided by the City. standard Street Lighting ®*^9ineer will consider the authorization of placing street lights in the city only at intersections, the end of cul-de-sacs, at steep hills along City streets, or the entrance to or within publicly-owned parking facilities, except when the strict application of such criteria would not be in the best interests of residents of the city. In such instances, an alternative location may be approved. In some cases, power may not be available to a particular location where a street light is weurranted. in these instances, the Council will consider assuming some of the additional costs of the power installation. The benefited property owners will normally be re<pired to assume any cost over $500. Payment shall be made to the City prior to the installation. Adjacent property owners are generally perceived to receive the most benefit from a street light, however, this will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. The initial action for the placement of such lights may come from City Staff who have been made aware of the need for street lights which meet such criteria or upon petition from residents who are interested in placement of a street light. The petition must, at a minimum, contain the signatures of all property owners who would be i * • JUL-29-1999 16512 CITY OF MIIOETOHJ^A 612 939 8244 P.03-03 COUNCIL POLICY 1-14 PLACEMENT OF STREET LIGHTS PAGE 2 affected by the placement of the light. This would generally include, but not be limited to, adjacent property owners and those across the ^ street or whose house would be significantly impacted because of its proximity to the proposed light. Residents inquiring Of the City about placement of street lights shall be made aware of ®^it®^ie for street light placement included in this policy. Decorative and Soeeial Lighting The developers of new residential areas may be required to install Street lighting systems as a stipulation of plat approval. Residents of residential areas may also petition the city for the placement of decorative street lighting systems in residential neighborhoods. If such installation is approved by the city Council, the property owners in the neighborhood served by such street lighting systems shall pay a separate charge established by the city to pay for the cost of the installation and operation of the street lighting systOT. Such charge shall appear separately on the quarterly utility billing to the property oimer from the City unless otherwise provided for. Payment for any additional wiring charges shall be made by the residents to the City prior to the system installation. The City Council may, from time to time, authorize the installation street lighting systems. Payment for the construction and operation of such lighting systems may be made by the City or charged benefitting property owners at the discretion of the City Council. Payment for any additional wiring charges shall be made by the property owner to the City.prior to the system installation. Adopted by Resolution No.83-7133 Meeting of February 28. 1983 Amended by Resolution No.86-8016 Meeting of.February 18. 1986 Amended by Resolution No.00-9126 Meeting of.September 24. 1990 tothl p.o: JLL-30-1999 11:25 CITY OF LOriG LAKE 612 476 9622 P.02 s* o 'V:,ciTYortMioir Muskijw) Office* r Pm\ kttnm 2750 M9t Ptrkwiy Oreno. MN SS356 MMif «Mno: P.O 6«i 66 CiyiUI »iy, MN 3$323-0066 Juiy 28. 1999 To: Lake Minnetonka Area Citic.s Public Works Direcioni L-PYI From: OtegGappa 1 am conducting a survey of street lighting policies for area cities. We do not have a dear City policy on street lights and need lu develop one for the Council for their August 9th meeting. Your assistance in an.swering the following questions would be greatly appreciated 1 . What percentage of your City has street lights? \ £) O 2. What percentage of your street lights arc City owned? NSP owned? 2.®A / 3. How is the operation and maintenance of street lights funded? /VS /V- p/3/2-T or 'Tne Pto 3. How do you handle requests for additional street lights in existing neighborhoods with street Ugbts? Who pejrs for any new street li»hU? I l<^,ejU.(oCw [t.o<r>C^ 4. How are street lights in new developments funded? per,r,o^i.. 7 ' ' ^*4 A edit 1^. Pott 5. If your entire city does not have street lights, how do you decide which areas get street lights? How do you handle requests to expand street lights to neighborhoods that are outside the street lighting area? 6. How is public involvement and notification handled? I)o you notify neighbors if a new street light will be installed? [\joitce. - JIX-29-1999 15:40 TUephooe (612) 249-4600 • Fax (612) 249-4616 6122494616 P.Ol TOThL P.02 ‘ JUL-2S-1999 16:12 CITY CF MimETOtlKA 612 939 8244 P.01/03 • —T... . * ' •••C* . V! cmrafcttONO Muaictpal Offices Stmt AMott: 2750 Kollty Peiltwiy OretM, MN 55356 ttsfUfli AMnu: P.O. Boi 66 Ciyitil liy. MW 55323^66 July 28.1999 To: Lake Minnetonka Area Cities Public Works Directors From: Greg Gappa 1 am conducting a survey of street lighting policies for area cities. We do not have a clear City policy on .street lights and need to develop one for the Council for their August 9th meeting. Your assistance in answering the following questions would be greatly appreciated 1. What percentage of your City has slreei lights? 2. What percentage of your street lights are City owned? NSP owned? A/S/> 3 5/^ Oiy Sfo 3. How is the operation and maintenance of street lights funded? G<«er#/ Pun^f - Sf^Atimref 3. How do you handle requests for additional street lights in existing neighborhoods with street lights? Copays for any new street lights? 4. How arc street lights in new developments funded? «s<< 5. If your entire city does not have street lights, how do you decide which areas get street lights? How do you handle requests to expand street lights to neighborhoods that are outside the street lighting area? Pohey 6. How is public involvement and notification handled? Do you notify neighbors if a new street light will be installed? S<< lUcphone (612) 249^4600 • Fax (612) 249*4616 08/02/1999 10:45 cm OF ORONO 6124717416 MTKABCH PAGE 01 •• ' ** /•"o NV ••A6\i, !/ CITY of ORONO Monldpal orOcM Sirut iUinui 2750 Kill*) Hdwty OnM, MN 55SS6 Mslhii P.O. Box K July 28. 1999 Tt>: l-ake MiniKtonka Area Cities Public Works Directors Fnim; Greg Oappa I aiu conducting a survey of street lighting policies for area chics. We do not have a clear C ily policy on 8tre«! lights and need to develop one for the Council for their August 9th meeting. Your assistance in answering the following questions would be greatly appreciated I. What percentage of your City has street lights? / /'o 2. percentage of your street lights arc City owned? NSP owned? 10 ^ P /OO 3. How is the operation mid nialnicnancc of street light.s funded? 3. How do you handle requ^sts for additional street lights in existing ncighlK>riioods with street light.4? Who pays for any new street lights? AJ JA‘ /COy^ 4. How arc street lights in new developments funded? /l/ J- Cx^i ^OO 5. If your entire city doe« not have street lights, how do you decide which areas get street lights? How do you handle requests to expand street lights to neighborhoods that are outside the street lighting area? 4///^ - 6. How is public involvement and nolificotion handled? Do you notify neighbors if a new street light will be installed?A - CJ^ /OO % 1Uephoo« (B12) 24#44M • Fax (412) 349^14 ITY OF ORONO ^ 6122A94616 07/29/99 15:45 Ci*:01/01 NO:827 GltY of ORONO MoDldpnl OfRcca tiTMt kUnui tm Mliy P«riMty Orem. MN $S3$fi MNMiif AMraii: f .0. eoi 66 CrytUI liy, MN 66323^66 July 28,1999 To: Lake Minnetonka Area Citicfi Public Works Directors From: Greg Qapps 1 am conducting a survey of street lighting policies for area cities. We do not have a clear City policy on street lights and need to develop one for the Council for their August 9th meeting. Your assistance in answering the following questions would be greatly appreciated 1. What percentage of your City has street lights? N/A 2. What percentage of your street lights arc City owned? NSP owned? City owns lite on County Road 110 and on County Road 15. Also xn new developments, NSP owns all others. There is a maintenance contract 3. i j^i&^%j>eration and maintenance of street tights funded? Paid by street department annual budget. 3. How do you handle requests for additional street lighU in existing neighborhoods with street lights? Who pays for any new street lights? Residents request. Out of street budget. 4. How are street lights in new developments funded? Developer pay for inital cost. It is than turned over to the City. 5. Tf your entire city does not have street lights, how do you decide which areas get street lights? How do you handle requests to expand street lights to neighborhoods that are outside the street lighting area? 6. How is public involvement and notification handled? Do you notify neighbors if a new street light will be installed? Residents request lights. lUsphoiM (612) 349-4600 • Fu (612) 24M616 ?00@ a.\'il0K JO .UID JlVJ___(DLCIIjftjft_____fijByjrjoT 1,1 1 r OF CP.ONO 612J7191S0 CITY OF SFfilKS Ff<PK © 6122494616 07/29/99 15:49 0 :01/01 no:82' /» «■ ••V ilto ^Oji^> o V. \\ ft'Ay GITYof OEONO Muf}U:ipal CfficM ■JBwiott-S^THt AiMflll: 2750 W!iy PvkMi Orano, MN $5358 Milliiil Mifrtai: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Biy, m S5323-CC66 July 28, 1999 To: Lake Minnetonka Area Cities Public Works Directors From: Oreg Gappa ^ I am conducting a survey of Street igh^ing j>.>ticies for area cities. We do not have a clciu* City policy on street lights and need to develop one for the Council for their Aug'.ist 9th meeting. Your assistance in answering the following qve.siions vvould be greatly Appreciated 1 . What percentage td' your City has street lights?Ta (007. 2. What percentage of your saeel lights sre City owned? NSP owned? AHOf- 7^ VO .1. Hovv is the operation and maintenance of street lights funded? 3. How do you handle requests for additional street lights in existing neighborhoods with street lights? WTio pays for any new* street lights? . ^ . vx- AS nr P^'/^ •4. How are street lights in new developments funded? 5. If your entire city does not have street lights, how- do you decide which areas get street lights? Kow do you handle requests to e.'ipuiid street lights to neigiiborhoods that are outside the street liglUicgarea? f^TlT/v(\J N&lQ-W^Off,I^OoD ioCrv\ 6. How is public involvcmcm and notificMon handled? Do you notify neigl^bors if a new street light will be installed? l^kohone (512) 149 4600 • Fax (tiia> 349-46(4 mcPT\NG AU8 0 9 1999 ij\ii ut UrtUNU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 9, 1999 ITEM NO.fX Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Purchase of Golf Course Fairway Mower i- On June 14th, the Council approved quotations for the purchase of new Golf Course Rough and Fairway Mowers. The plan was to delete the proposed maintenance shed addition from the Golf Course Capital Budget and purchase the two new mowers. Purchase of these mowers is necessary because of mechanical problems with the existing Steiner mower. The Steiner mower will be traded in for the new fairway mower. Quotations were received for both mowers. The approved quotation for the TORO rough mower was $15,921 from MTI distributing. This is under the $25,000 limit requirement for advertising for sealed bids. The approved quotation for the TORO Fairway Mower including the trade in allowance and sales tax was $22,960.34 However, further investigation revealed that the value of the trade in mower must be considered for the $25,000 limit. With the $3,500 value for the trade in mower value included, the total value was over the $25,000 threshold for sealed bids. Adverting for sealed bids was completed with an August 2nd bid opening. Two sealed bids were received. Total Bid Price (Includes trade in allowance and sales tax) MTI Distributing, Plymouth MN, TORO Reelmaster 5200 Fairway Mower $22,960.33 Cushman Motor Company, Minneapolis MN, kansomes 250 Fairway Mower $23,470.00 The TORO Reelmaster 5200 Fairway Mower meets the bid specification requirements and is the lowest responsible bid received. Staffs recommendation is to awaid the bid to MTI Distributing for the TORO Fairway mower with payment from the Golf Course Fund. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to award bid for purchase of a TORO Reelmaster 5200 Fairway Mower from MTI Distributing, Plymouth MN for $22,960.34. Motion to amend the 1999 Golf Course Capital Outlay Budget to delete the maintenance shed addition and approve the purchase of a Fairway Mower for $22,960.34 MPpTlNS AUG 0 9 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; August 9, 1999 CU Y ur OHONO ITEM NO.:/3 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer’s Report Item Description: Request for Payment #1 Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Project We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; Motion to approve Request for Payment #1, Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Project to G.L. Contracting Inc. in the amount of $127,179.48 rsr Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik^i ^ I Associates Englneers& Architects Owner City of Orono 2750 Kelly PkwyCrystal Bay, MN, 55323-0066 Date:August 4.1999 For Period:7/1/99 to 8.G/99 Request No:1 Contractor G L Contracting Inc 4300 Willow DrMedina, MN, 55340 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT EDGEWOOD HILLS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS BRA FILE NO. 139-98-099 SUMMARY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Original Contract Amount Change Order • Addition Change Order • Deduction Revised Contract ^imount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned Less Retainage 5% Subtotal Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $ $94,341.90 $ 5, $ $ $ $ $ Recommended for Approval by. BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Approved by Con G L CONTRACTING INC Approved by Owner CITY OF ORONO Specified Contract Completion Date: September 3,1999 Date: 252,962.00 158,620.10 133,873.14 0.00 133,873.14 6,693.66 127,179.48 0.00 127.179.48 •I .n .! ! No. Change Order Number 1 Item Part 1 • Sanitary Sewer 1 8" PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35, 0'-8* deep 2 Connect 8" PVC to existing manhole 3 4' diameter sanitary MH. 8' deep, inci R-1642-B cstg 4 Directional bore 8" HDPE SDR 11 5 Directional bore 4” HDPE SDR 11 service pipe 6 4" PVC cleanout 7 8" X 4" PVC service wye branch 8 Furnish 8" x 4" PVC wye, cut into ex. 8" PVC 9 4" PVC service pipe in place, SDR 26 10 Mechanical trench compaction 11 Insulation 12 Sanitary sewer television inspection 13 Connect 4” PVC to existing home Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer Part 2 - Restoration 14 Clear and Grub 15 Sod with 4" topson 16 Seed with topsoil, mulch and fertilizer 17 Erosion control fence 18 Furnish and plant Evergreen Tree (Blue Spruce) 6' high 19 Furnish and plant shade tree (Sugar Maple) 4" diameter 20 Remove and transplant bushes 21 Remove and transplant tree • Deciduous 22 Remove and transplant tree • Coniferous Total Part 2 > Restoration Change Order No. 1 Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer Total Part 2 - Restoration Total Work Completed To Date Unit Contract Quantity Unit Price Quantity to Date Amount to Date LF 1030 32.2 1073 $34,550.60 EA 1 2496.8 1 $2,496.80 EA 7 1779.7 7 $12,457.90 LF 60 74.8 60 $4,488.00 LF 585 48.3 707 $34,148.10 EA 7 281.1 10 $2,811.00 EA 6 40.5 6 $243.00 EA 3 1703.3 3 $5,109.90 LF 550 19 458 $8,702.00 LF 1580 0.98 1531 $1,500.38 SY 100 9.6 64 $614.40 LF 1030 1.6 $0.00 EA 8 2545.3 8 $20,362.40 $127,484.48 LS 1 3786 1.26 $4,770.36 SY 2000 3.6 370 $1,332.00 AC 1 5244.5 $0.00 LF 1050 1.8 30 $54.00 EA 20 345.9 $0.00 EA 10 345.9 $0.00 EA 10 232.3 1 $232.30 EA 10 232.3 $0.00 EA 10 232.3 $0.00 $6,388.66 $127,484.48 $6,388.66 $133,873.14 requtstxls "1 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF ORONO BRA FILE NO. 139-98-099 CONTRACTOR G L CONTRACTING INC CHANGE ORDERS No.Date Description Amount 1 6/8/99 Revised sewer allignment based on a value engineered design.-$94,341.90 Total Change Orders ($94,341.90) PAYMENT SUMMARY 1 07/01/99 08/03/99 127.179.48 6.693.66 133,873.14 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 , 9 • 10 Material on Hand Totai Payment to Date $127,179.48 Original Contract $252,962.00 Retainage Pay No. 1 6.693.66 Change Orders -$94,341.90 Totai Amount Earned •$133,873.14 Revised Contract $158,620.10 rtquMtJte COUNCIL MEETING AUG 0 9 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF OHONO DATE: August 9, 1999 ITEM NO. Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Request for Payment it\ Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Project We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Payment #1, Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Project to Widmer Inc. in the amount of $217,147.91 .• !■ rtw• V 1 ti f r* li I i '■••u.* At.’ I/I Bonestroo Rosene ■ Anderlik & Associates E/>9ine«rs ft A/chitecti Owner City of Orono 2750 Kelly Pkwy. PO Box 219. Crystal Bay, MN, 55323-0066 Date:__August 4,1999 For Period: 7/1/99 to 8/4/99_________________________________Request N.g:_______1_____ Contractor Widmer Inc 4250 Creekview Circle. PO Box 219. St Bonifaclus. MN. 55375 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT ORONO ORCHARD SANITARY SEWER BRA FILE NO. 139-98-101 SUMMARY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Original Contract Amount Change Order • Addition Change Order - Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned Less Re^nage 5% Subtotal Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $ $ $ 0.00 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. V Approved by Qpntractor. WIOMER INC w-Approved by Owt'.er CITY OF ORONO Specified Contract Completion Date: October 15,199f Date: 424.713.50 424,713.50$_______________________ $ 228.576.75 $___________0.00 $ 228.576.75 $______11.428.84 $ 217.147.91 $___________0.00 raquttUte No. i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 Item Part 1 • Sanitary Sewer 8" PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35,0'-8' deep 8" PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35, 8-10 ’ deep 8" PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35,10'-12 ’ deep 8" PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35,12’-14 ’ deep 8" PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35,14'-16' deep 8" DIP, 8‘-10' deep in place 8" DIP, 10 ’-1Z deep in place 4' diameter sanitary MH, 8’ deep, inci R-1642-B cstg MH depth greater than 8' deep Outside drop Directional bore 8" HDPE SDR 11 Directional bore 4" HDPE SDR 11 service pipe 8" X 4" PVC rr HDPE compatible service v^e branch 4” PVC senrice pipe In place, SDR 26 4" PVC, SDR 26 riser pipe improved pipe foundation in 6" increment depth Mechanicai trench compaction insuiation Closed circuit TV inspection Submersibie pump lift station Connect to e^ng force main as per MCES detail Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer Part 2 • Restoration Remove bituminous pavement Common excavation (EV) Aggregate base. Class 5,100% crushed Type 31 bituminous base course Type 41A bituminous wearing course Geotextile Filter Bituminous material for tack coat Bituminous street patching Clear and Grub Bituminous drivevray restoration Concrete driveway restoration Sodding, ind 4" topsoil Seed wi^ topsoil, mulch and fertifizer Erosion cc-'hol fence Furnish ano plant evergreen tree (blue spruce) 6’ high Furnish and plant shade tree (Sugar Maple) 4” diameter Remove and transplant bushes Remove and transplant tree - Desiduous Remove and transplant tree • Coniferous Total Part 2 - Restoration Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer Total Part 2 • Restoration Total WorK Completed To Date Contract Unit Quantity Amount Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date LF 480 36 522 $18,792.00 LF 150 36 150 $5,400.00 LF 160 36 160 $5,760.00 LF 30 36 25 $900.00 LF 310 36 297 $10,692.00 LF 60 45 35 $1,610.00 LF 20 46 $0.00 EA 15 1500 14 $21,000.00 LF 69 100 58.4 $5,840.00 LF 11.9 150 11.9 $1,785.00 LF 2550 47 2439 $114,633.00 LF 560 28 60 $1,680.00 EA 23 75 22 $1,650.00 LF 450 8 250 $2,000.00 LF 100 8 $0.00 LF 1200 2 $0.00 LF 1710 0.25 1439 $359.75 SY 100 10 $0.00 LF 3760 0.5 $0.00 LS 1 72000 0.3 $21,600.00 - LS 1 10000 $0.00 $213,701.75 SY 4000 0.75 1500 $1,125.00 CY 550 7.5 400 $3,000.00 TN 1100 10 500 $5,000.00 TN 170 30 $0.00 TN 130 31 $0.00 SY 1450 1 $0.00 GAL 100 0.01 $0.00 SY 2400 9.5 $0.00 LS 1 5000 1 $5,000.00 SY 500 10.5 $0.00 SF 100 8 $0.00 SY 13000 3 $0.00 AC 0.2 7500 $0.00 LF 2000 2 $0.00 EA 5 450 $0.00 EA 5 500 $0.00 EA 10 SO $0.00 EA 25 250 2 $500.00 EA 5 250 1 $250.00 $14,875.00 $213,701.75 $14,875.00 $228,576.75 rtquttiicit t' I PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF ORONO BRA FILE NO. 139-98-101 CONTRACTOR WIDMER INC CHANGE ORDERS t ^ • Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY From Payment Retalnage Completed 1 07/01/99 08/04/99 217.147.91 11.428.84 228.576.75 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $217,147.91 Original Contract $424,713.50 Retainaoe Pay No.1 11.428.84 Change Orders Total Amount Earned $228,576.75 Revised Contract $424,713.50 rtquMlxJs COl INCIL meeting aUG 0 9 1999 cn Y UH OHUNU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 9, 1999 ITEM NO./r Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer’s Report Item Description: Request for City Water St. Edward’s Church, 865 North Femdale Road The Couacil recently approved the connection of St. Edward’s Church to the Plymouth sanitary sewer system with the church to be billed for sewer service from the City of Plymouth. The Church has also requested approval for connection to the Plymouth water system. This is okay with Plymouth, if the Church receives approval from Orono for this connection. The billing arrangement would be the same as for sewer, with Plymouth billing the church directly for water service, St. Edward’s would like a connection to City water to provide adequate water pressure and flow for the installation of a fire sprinkler system. With the Femdale Road reconstmetion project both sanitary sewer and watermain were installed under Femdale Road to the Church’s property line. Our staff recommendation is that this is a reasonable request and will improve public safety by allowing the Church to install a fire sprinkler system. We are recommending that the Council approve the request from St. Edward’s Church to connect to the City of Plymouth water system with the church to billed for water service from the Cry of Plymouth. COLiNCn. ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of request from St. Edward’s Church, 865 North Femdale Road, to connect to the City of Plymouth sanitary sewer system. cot imcil meeting AUG 0 9 1999 cu Y OF UHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Augusts, 1999 ITEM NO; Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Budget Adjustment to Reflect the Acquisition of Saga Hill Park Access Easements The Council has authorized staff to acquire easements necessary for the construction of an access drive to the Saga Hill Park area. The easements are being acquired from the Fairview Covenant Church and from the Palmer property. The amounts to be paid for the easements are $6,504.40 for the easement on the Fairview Covenant Church property, and $6,377.90 for the easement on the Palmer property. In addition, the City \vill pay closing costs and incidental expenses inclined by the Church and the Palmers. This will bring the total cost to approximately $14,000. This amount is being funded from the Park Fund. COUPiCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to amend the Park Fund budget to reflect the expenditure of $14,000 for the acquisition of easements for the Saga Hill Park area access. rn« tMrii meeting AU6 0 9 W99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CU Y 0»^ UriUNO DATE: August 5,1999 nITEM NO: Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Scheduling of a Work Session Regarding Housing Options As part of the City's Comp Plan update process, the City Council has been reviewing housing options such as townhomes. The Council has toured a number of townhome developments. A suggested next step in the process is to meet with a developer of quality townhomes and other housing types. Ron Clark is a developer who has developed townhomes in Wayzata and Tonka Bay, as well as a number other western suburbs. Mr. Clark is willing to meet with the Council in a work session to share his insights regarding townhome development and important elements of quality development. If the Council is interested in such a work session, a date should be selected when all Council Members are available for a two hour block of time. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to set a date and time for a work session with Ron Clark to review and discuss information regarding quality housing options. }■ • 1 nn» iwr'L AUG 0 9 W99 cat Oh ortONo REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Augusts, 1999 ITEM NO: / % Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Title City Clerk_______ Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval CIGARETTE LICENSE Troy Krahenbahl Western Convenience (formerly Orono Self Service) 2160 Wayzata Boulevard SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Applicant: Event: Location: Date: Time: Rick Recker Com Days 4 Mile Road Running Foot Race Willow Drive at Hackberry Park, south to Brown Road, north to Orchard Lane, west to Holbrook Park August 15,1999 11:15 a.m. to Noon COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. 1. 2. 3. 4. ot APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND^.o^ TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES \ U :sH (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 12J0BI97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address:P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) Applicant's Full Name ^----------------------------------------FIRST MIDDLE Applicant’s Home Address L Ct In I LAST HOUSE NUMBER STREET A/J~ HOME PHONE CITY STATE Applicant's Business ^,fJ'7Y<r-OH7? TYPE OF BUSINESS BUSINESS NAME BUSINESS PHONE Po 3o)c 3^0 STREETADDRESS OntJOmMAIUNG ADDRESS Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes ------------------------------- ^ ^ =»--WiC r/ffTr I HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR UCENSE TO SELL PRODUCTS, OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. Signature The Issuance of a Bcense under this oaSnsnee shall be considered a ptMlege ai^ not ^bsolute right of the applicant andshaOnot entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the Bcense. 121197.3 I •i 2 PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PER3VIIT APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Permit #: Fee: S50.00 Date Received: Phone Number: "3"^^ Name: Address ; S. City, State. Zip; IAimn Q\Peo. VAN<5'5^MC>\ ; \K)»jLa>J SoOtmTO ii'jN {Lo tiafemTo CXJu>ifl5*jo LtA, tJESrlo l^auSCaoit- ^fvfe*L ’ t ^ Date of Event: ______■ Hours of Event: ^ A " \~V’0DP___ Location of Parade or Event: Type of Event; f^crr Insurance Company:,Amount: (Copy of insurance certificate, on which the City, its agents and employees are named as additional insured, must be submitted witn this application.) I am aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding parades and special events and will abide by same. I also agree to hold the City of Orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the parade of special event approved by the granting of this permit. I understand some events may require off-duty or reserve officers and a fee may be required for these services. _______________________t'BSA Signature Date Approved: d Denied: D By:. Remarks: ! ] ' 4*^* Date: To: August 4,1999 Lin Vee, City Clerk From: Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Subject: Com Days Foot Race I have reviewed the application from Rick Recker for the above mentioned race. I have no objection to the issuance of the permit, however, Mr. Recker will be expected to pay an additional fee of $50 as a result of needing Reserve Officers to assist with traffic, etc. . ' -r\ i f 4 Aug 1999 Wed 12:13 PM Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046358 046358 PETERSON, BARBARA A. Tocale Check Number 046358 Check Number 046359 046359 MOORSE, RONALD J. Total-1 Check Number 046359 Check Register City of Orono Check Date 09-Aug-99 09-Aug-99 Page 1 Check Amount 269.36 269.36 184.70 184.70 COUNCIL MEETINO WJG 0 9 1999 CITY OH UriUiMU Check Number 046360 046360 TLINT, RICHARD Totals Check Nun&ir 046360 Check Number 046361 09-Aug-99 269.36 269.36 046361 JABBOUR, GABRIEL E. Tocals Check Number 046361 09-Aug-99 323.22 323.22 Check Number 046362 046362 KELLEY, CHARLES Totals Check Number 046362 06-Aug-99 269.36 269.36 Check Number 046363 046363 SANSEVERE, ROBERT K. Totals Check Number 046363 09-Aug-99 269.36 269.36 Grand Total 1,585 36 28 Jul 1999 Wed 8;09 AM Check Register City of Orono ^ -:k • jer Employee Name Check Number 046298 046298 JOHNSON, MARY ANN Totals Check Number 046298 Check Number 046299 046299 BERRY, HEIDI N. Totals Check Number 046299 Check Number 046300 046300 HASEMAN, CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 046300 Check Number 046301 046301 KOORSE, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046301 Check Number 046302 046302 VEB, LINDA S. Totals Check Number 046302 Check Number 046303 046303 KUEKN, THOMAS M. Totals Check Number 046303 Check Number 046304 046304 OLSON, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046304 Check Number 0463OS 046305 PETTIT, SANDRA K. Totals Check Number 046305 Check Number 046306 Check Date 28-JU1-99 28-Jul-99 28-JU1-99 28-Jul-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 Page 1 Check Amount 661.33 661.33 348.51 348.51 680.95 680.95 1,591.08 1,591.08 1,073.72 1,073.72 1,018.58 1,018.58 28.53 28.53 391.83 391.83 •M r * ^,1 ■ i-' 28 Jul 1999 Wed 8:09 AM Check Register City of Orono ck . joer Employee Name Check Number 046306 046306 ANDERSON, BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 046306 Check Number 046307 046307 BOBZIEN, SUE A. Totals Check Number 046307 Check Number 046308 046308 BORIS, SCOTT W. Totals Check Number 046308 Check Number 046309 046309 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. Totals Check Number 046309 Check Number 046310 046310 CHESWICK, GARY B. Totals Check Number 046310 Check Number 046311 046311 CORNICE, JAMBS L. Totals Check Number 046311 Check Number 046312 046312 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C. Totals Check Number 046312 Check Number 046313 046313 ERICKSON, KURT R Totals Check Number 046313 Check Number 046314 046314 FARNIOR, CORREY L. Check Date 28-JU1-99 28-Jul-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 Page 2 Check Amount 323.07 323.07 657.24 657.24 1,217.48 1,217.48 334.76 334.76 1,519.16 1,519.16 1,416.78 1,416.78 1,701.04 1,701.04 1,275.96 1,275.96 1,363.74 - .» •» I ■MM!"r 28 Jul 1999 Wed 8:09 AM Check Register City of Orono -dc 4 «)er Employee Name Check Number 046314 Totals Check Number 046314 Check Number 046315 046315 FISCHENICH, DAN T. Totals Check Number 046315 Check Number 046316 046316 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K. Totals Check Number 046316 Check Number 046317 046317 JOHNSON, JEFFREY Totals Check Number 046317 Check Number 046318 046318 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 046318 Check Number 046319 046319 KNOLLENBERG, KRISTIN L. Totals Check Number 046319 Check Number 046320 046320 MADSON, ADRIQINE M. Totals Check Number 046320 Check Number 046321 046321 MCNALLY. STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 046321 Check Number 046322 046322 MCNICKOLS, DAVID L. Check Date 28-Jul-99 28-JU1-99 28-Jul-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-Jul-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 Page 3 Check Amount 1,363.74 1,151.21 1,151.21 1,072.06 1,072.06 548.15 548.15 1,445.59 1,445.59 423.08 423.08 445.00 445.00 1,079.48 1,079.48 795.84 28 Jul 1999 Wed 8:09 AM Check Register City of Orono r -k I ^er Employee Name Check Number 046322 Totals Check Number 046322 Check Number 046323 046323 KOROWCZYNSKI, JAMES Totals Check Number 046323 Check Number 046324 046324 PERSELL, WILLIAM R. Totals Check Number 046324 Check Number 046325 046325 SCHOENHOFP, JOHN B. Totals Check Number 046325 Check Number 046326 046326 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F. Totals Check Number 046326 Check Number 046327 046327 TOMCZYK, MARK W. Totals Check Number 046327 Check Humber 046328 046328 WITTKB« ANTHONY P. Totals Check Number 046328 Check Number 046329 046329 HOECHST« ROBYN A. Totals Check Number 046329 Check Number 046330 046330 KOCZUR, JASON R. Totals Check Number 046330 Check Date 28-Jul-99 28-Jul-99 28-Ju*-99 28-Jul-99 28-Jul-99 28-JU1-99 28-Jul-99 28-JU1-99 Page 4 Check Amount 795.84 1,791.22 1,791.22 siiMiaiiiaamaaiifliia 188.22 188.22 1,323.62 1,323.62 325.53 325 33 1,284.62 1,284.62 582.68 582.68 513.87 513.87 280.07 280.07 i ■« ! 28 Jul 1999 Wed 8:09 AM Check Register City of Orono r- -k ft jer Employee Name Check Number 046330 Check Number 046331 046331 BOTTENBERG, WENDY C. Totals Check Number 046331 Check Number 046332 046332 GAFFRON, MICHAEL P. Totals Check Number 046332 Check Number 046333 046333 GAPPA, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 046333 Check Number 046334 046334 JENSON, KRISTINE K. Totals Check Number 046334 Check Number 046335 046335 OMAN, LYLE B. Totals Check Number 046335 Check Number 046336 046336 PALMATEER,LD M. Totals Check Number 046336 Check Number 046337 046337 WEINBERGER, PAUL E. Totals Check Number 046337 Check Number 046338 046338 BRINKHAUS, JOHN P. Totals Check Number 046338 Check Date 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 Page 5 Check Amount 700.96 . 700.96 1,170.62 1,170.62 1,575.69 1,575.69 899.97 899.97 252.45 252.45 969.37 963.37 1,065.26 1,065.26 1,123.02 1,123.02 28 Jul 1999 Wed 8:09 AM Check Register City of Orono zk m -oer Employee Name Check Number 046339 046339 DEBAERE, DONALD L. Totals Check Number 046339 Check Number 046340 046340 GREGORY, JAMES D. Totals Check Number 046340 Check Number 046341 046341 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 046341 Check Number 046342 046342 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G. Totals Check Number 046342 Check Number 046343 046343 OBRIEN, RANDY L. Totals Check Number 046343 Check Number 046344 046344 PALMER, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 046344 Check Number 046345 046345 RATHBUN, BARRY J. Totals Check Number 046345 Check Number 046346 046346 SKREEN, DALE S. Totals Check Number 046346 Check Number 046347 046347 ABRAKAMSON, PRSD W. Check Date 28-Jul-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-Jul-99 20-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 Page 6 Check Amount 920.15 920.15 591.57 591.57 654.01 654.01 620.63 620.63 225.99 225.99 760.85 760.85 1,112.80 1,112.80 944.15 944.15 187.96 i 28 Jul 1999 Wed 8:09 AM Check Register City o£ Orono r -:k A jer Employee Name Check Number 046347 Totals Check Number 046347 Check Number 046348 046348 BLAIR, JANIS A. Totals Check Number 046348 Check Number 046349 046349 DOCKEN« THOMAS W. Totals Check Number 046349 Check Number 046350 046350 JOHNSON, JOSHUA E. Totals Check Number 046350 Check Number 046351 046351 MCINTYRE, WILLIAM B. Totals Check Number 046351 Check Number 046352 046352 OAS, DANIEL 0. Totals Check Number 046352 Check Number 046353 046353 PETERSON, JACK W. Totals Check Number 046353 Check Number 046354 046354 RAICHE, VICTORIA H. Totals Check Number 046354 Check Number 046355 046355 ROSS, JOHN A. Check Date 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-JU1-99 28-Jul-99 28-JU1-99 Page 7 Check Amount 187.96 138.62 138.62 489.28 489.28 177.37 177.37 240.94 240.94 191.78 191.78 346.67 346.67 122.01 122.01 75.88 : i •L 28 Jul 1999 Wed 8:09 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 8 r ck , jer Employee Name Check Date Check Amount Check Number 046355 Totals Check Number 046355 75.88 Check Number 046356 046356 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD E.28-JU1-99 Totals Check Number 046356 1,097.20 1,097.20 Grand Total 45,509.20 I L a* aiimr —‘ 5 Aug 1999 Thu 3:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 594€5 59465 59465 59465 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 05-Aug-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 05-Aug-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 05-Aug-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE Totals Check Number 59465 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE Check Number 59466 ALL STAR PRO GOLF 59466 04-Aug-99 ALL STAR PRO GOLF Totals Check Number 59466 ALL STAR PRO GOLF Check Number 59467 AT 6 T - 59467 04-Aug-99 AT & T - Totals Check Number 59467 AT & T - Check Number 59468 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES Check Number 59469 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 59469 04-Aug-99 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF Totals Check Number 59469 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF Check Number 59470 BCA/CJDN CONFERENCE 59470 04-Aug-99 BCA/CJDN CONFERENCE Totals Check Number 59470 BCA/CJDN CONFERENCE Check Number 59471 BIFFS INC. 59471 59471 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 BIFFS INC BIFFS INC Totals Check Number 59471 BIFFS INC. Check Number 59473 BONESTROO ROSENE fc ASSOC. Transaction Amount 486.05 16.67 16.67 519.39 480.42 480.42 2.98 2.98 55.44 55.44 30.00 30.00 66.76 243.20 309.96 Page 1 Comments CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE ON CALL PHONE ON CALL PHONE GOLF GLOVES ACCESS CKGS 6 TAX 59468 04-Aug-99 AT Ik T WIRELESS SERVICES 104.32 CELL PHONE SERVICE 59468 04-Aug-99 AT k T WIRELESS SERVICES 17.25 CELL PHONE SERVICE 59468 04-Aug-99 AT k T WIRELESS SERVICES 17.26 CELL PHONE SERVICE 59468 04-Aug-99 AT k T WIRELESS SERVICES 14.09 CELL PHONE SERVICE Totals Check Number 59468 AT k T WIRELESS SERVICES 152.92 HOT DOGS* HAMBURGERS CJDN CONF - BOBZIEN PORTABLE-GOLF COURSE PORTABLE-HACKBERRY •! 1 a 5 Aug 1999 Thu 3:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Check Number Date Name Check Number 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 59473 BONESTROO 05-Aug-99 05«Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 ROSENE a ASSOC. BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENS BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC, a ASSOC Totals Check Number 59473 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC Check Number 59474 BUDGET PRINTING 59474 05-Aug-99 Totals Check Number BUDGET PRINTING 59474 BUDGET PRINTING Check Number 59475 BUSINESS FORMS a ACCOUNTING 59475 59475 59475 59475 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 BUSINESS FORMS a ACCOUNTING BUSINESS FORMS a ACCOUNTING BUSINESS FORMS a ACCOUNTING BUSINESS FORMS a ACCOUNTING Totals Check Number 59475 BUSINESS FORMS a ACCOUNTING Transaction Amount 3,367.50 100.00 3.022.00 2.252.75 2,944.60 7,299.89 3,795.91 113.15 1.548.00 3,220.62 193.50 267.69 266.10 1.309.75 32.25 166.17 11,437.74 41,337.82 5.09 5.09 239.50 239.51 359.51 235.74 1,074.26 Comments DICKEY PARK - PARKING LOT MAY COUNCIL MTGS STUBBS BAY LAKE ACCESS SAGA HILLS ACCESS EASM APPLICATIONS NAV WTR PLANT REHAB 5/99 EDGEWOOD HILLS SWR 5/99 HERITAGE DR SWR 5/99 ORONO ORCHARD SWR 5/99 ORONO ORCHARD SWR 5/99 WEBER HILLS SWR 5/99 LS 813 REHAB MAY 99 1/1 CASCO FERNDALE AREA CR 15 TRAFFIC STUDY 85 HEAD SEWER MAY 99 OCB RD TR PROJ DOCUMNTATN TH12/STUBBS BY RD CLOSURE SHIPPING TO BCA UTILITY BILLS UTILITY BILLS AP CHECKS PR CHECKS Check Number 59476 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 59476 04-Aug-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 50.96 OIL CHG, ROTATE TIRE 185 59476 04-Aug-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 173.46 OIL CHG, TRANSMISSION 180 59476 04-Aug-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 93.75 OIL CHG, COOLNG FLUSH 178 59476 04-Aug-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 94.71 OIL CHG, LIGHTS 177 59476 04-Aug-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 32.21 OIL CHG 185 59476 04-Aug-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 62.50 ROAD TST, CLN RAD 180 59476 04-Aug-99.CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 280.73 OIL, TRANS, DIAGNOS 186 59476 04-Aug-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 5>.40 OIL, TRANS, HDLGHT 163 59476 04-Aug-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 45.71 OIL, TIRE RPR 184 i - ->v 5 Aug 1999 Thu 3:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59475 59476 59476 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 04-Aug-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 04-Aug-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Totals Check Number 59476 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Check Number 59477 CLASSIFIEDS 59477 04-Aug-99 CLASSIFIEDS Totals Check Number 59477 CLASSIFIEDS Check Number 59478 CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA GRP 59478 04-Aug-99 CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA GRP Totals Check Number 59478 CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA GRP Check NunU^er 59479 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 59479 04-Aug-99 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Totals Check Number 59479 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Check Number 59480 DCA 59480 05-Aug-99 DCA Totals Check Number 59480 DCA Check Number 59481 DCA - WIRE ONLY 59481 04-Aug-99 DCA - WIRE ONLY Totals Check Number 59481 DCA - WIRE ONLY Check Number 59482 DELL 59482 05-Aug-99 DELL Totals Check Number 59482 DELL Check Number 59483 DELTA DENTAL 59483 59483 59483 04-Aug-99 C4-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 DELTA DQITAL DELTA DENTAL DELTA DENTAL Transaction Amount 240.45 44.95 1«178.83 78.90 78.90 27.55 27.55 121.00 121.00 151.20 151.20 464.16 464.16 1,811.60 1,811.60 3.64 0.94 6.95 Page 3 Comments OIL, BRAKES ALIGN FRONT END 179 181 ADV FOR ADM SUPPORT ADV FOR MOWER BIDS BEER FOR RESALE 7/99 ADH FEB SPENDING ACCOUNTS 7/26/99 PHI 450 COMPUTER AUGUST 99 DENTAL AUGUST 99 DENTAL AUGUST 99 DENTAL f \* I 5 Aug 1999 Thu 3:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 4 Check Transaction Check Number 59487 ELDREDGB TRADING. INC 59487 05-Aug-99 ELDREDGE TRADING. INC Totals Check Number 59487 ELDREDGB TRADING. INC Check Number 59488 ELECTION SYSTEMS k SOFTWARE 59488 04-Aug-99 ELECTION SYSTEMS k SOFTWARE Totals Check Number 59480 ELECTION SYSTEMS k SOFTWARE Check Number 59489 FAIRVIEW CONVBNANT CHURCH, INC 59489 05-Aug-99 FAIRVIEW CONVENANT CHURCH, INC Totals Check Number 59409 FAIRVIEW CONVBNANT CHURCH, INC Check Number 59490 FORTIS BENEFITS 59490 04-Aug-99 FORTIS BENEFITS Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 59483 DELTA DENTAL 59483 04-Aug-99 DELTA DENTAL 2.82 AUGUST 99 DENTAL 59483 04-Aug-99 DELTA DENTAL 0.94 AUGUST 99 DENTAL 59403 04-Aug-99 DELTA DENTAL 5.93 AUGUST 99 DENTAL 59403 04-Aug-99 DELTA DENTAL 791.90 AUGUST 99 DENTAL 59483 04-Aug-99 DELTA DENTAL 0.94 AUGUST 99 DENTAL Totals Check Number 59483 DELTA DENTAL 814.14 Check Number 59484 B-Z RECYCLING 59484 04-Aug-99 E-Z RECYCLING 5,697.72 JULY 1999 recycl: Totals Check Number 59484 E-Z RECYCLING 5.697.72 Check Number 59485 EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC. 59485 04-Aug-99 EARL P. ANDERSON A ASSOC.793.24 STREET SIGNS 59485 04-Aug-99 EARL P. ANDERSON A ASSOC.198.09 TRAIL SIGNS Totals Check Number S948S EARL P. ANDERSON A ASSOC.991.33 Check Number 59486 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 59486 04-Aug-99 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 109.35 BEER FOR RESALE Totals Check Number 59406 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 109.35 269.50 269.50 187.05 187.05 6,504.40 6,504.40 -110.87 SHIRTS FOR RESALE MDGS FOR JUDGES EASEMENT-SAGA HILL ACCESS CREDIT - TERM EMPLOYEES 5 Aug 1999 Thu 3:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59490 59490 FORTIS BENEFITS 04-Aug-99 FORTIS BENEFITS Totals Check Number 59490 FORTIS BENEFITS Check Number 59491 G L CONTRACTING 59491 05-Aug-99 G L CONTRACTING Totals Check Number 59491 G L CONTRACTING Check Number 59492 HARRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 59492 59492 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 HARRIS INTERNATIONAL INC HARRIS INTERNATIONAL INC Totals Check Number 59492 HARRIS INTERNATIONAL INC Check Number 59493 HENN COUNTY TREAURER / 59493 05-Aug-99 HENN COUNTY TREAURER / Totals check Number 59493 HENN COUNTY TREAURER / Check Number 59494 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. 59494 04-Aug-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. Totals Check Number 59494 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. Check Number 59495 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 59495 04-Aug-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASimER Totals Check Number 59495 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Check Number 59496 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA 59496 05-Aug-99 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA Totals Check Nundder 59496 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA Check Number 55497 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 59497 05-Aug-99 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC Totals Check Number 59497 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC Check Number 59498 LAKE MANAGEMNT INC. Transaction Amount 724.25 613.38 127,197.48 127,197.48 235.79 159.90 75.89 393.75 393.75 95.52 95.52 49.34 49.34 308.00 308.00 57.93 57.93 Page 5 Comments AUGUST LTD INSURANCE RFr it? EDGWD HILL SAN SWR RENTAL CLUBS RENTAL CLUBS JAIL CHARGES 6/99 POSTAL VERIFICATIONS BASE MAPPING PARCEL DATA LEGAL-90 FORD PU-FORFEIT PRO 1000 REMOTE DUAL 5 Aug 1999 Thu 3:07 PM Chec). Register City of Orono Check Ny!Jber Date Name Check Number 59498 59498 LAKS MANAGEMNT INC. 04-Aug-99 LAKE MANAGEMNT INC, Totals Check Number 59498 LAKE MANAGEMNT INC Check Number 59499 LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 59499 05-Aug-99 LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Totals Check Number 59499 LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Check Number 59500 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT 59500 59500 59500 59500 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 59500 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT Check Number 59501 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 59501 59501 59501 59501 59501 59501 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 59501 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Check Number 59502 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 59502 04-Aug-99 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Totals Check Number 59502 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Number 59503 MINNCOMM 59503 04-Aug-99 MINNCOMM Totals Check Number 59503 MINNCOMM Check Number 59504 MINNEGASCO 59504 59504 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO Transaction Amount 698.00 698.00 30.00 30.00 19.44 39.88 5.27 -6.57 58.02 4.96 8.82 8.85 13.58 4.80 56.02 97.03 364.70 364.70 4.34 4.34 136.22 11.95 Page 6 Comments POND SPRAYING PARADE REGISTRATION LINE FOR WEED WHIP SUPPLIES-CUT OFF SAWS EAR PLUGS CREDIT ON ACCOUNT SCREWS WASHER, NUT SCREW SEAL HEX NUT FLAIR CLEVIS SODA FOR RESALE FED AND ST CHGS-PW PAGERS GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE > . 5 Aug 1999 Thu 3:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59504 59504 59504 59504 MINNEGASCO 04-Aug-99 MINNEGASCO 04-Aug-99 MINNEGASCO 04 -Aug- 99 MINNEGASCO Totals Check Number 59504 MINNEGASCO Check Number 59505 MINNESOTA DARE INC 59505 OS-Aug-99 MINNESOTA DARE INC Totals Check Number 59505 MINNESOTA DARE INC Check Number 59506 MINNESOTA UC FUND 59506 04-Aug-99 MINNESOTA UC FUND Totals Check Number 59506 MINNESOTA UC FUND Check Number 59507 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 59507 04-Aug-99 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Totals Check Number 59507 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Check Number 59508 MN STATE TREASURER 59508 59508 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 MN STATE TREASURER MN STATE TREASURER Totals Check Number 59508 MN STATS TREASURER Check Number 59509 MORONCZYNSKl« JIM 59509 04-Aug-99 MOROHCZYNSKX* JIM Totals Check Number 59509 MOROWCZYNSKI. JIM Check Number 59510 MTI DIST CO. 59510 05-Aug-99 MTI DIST CO Totals Check Nua^er 59510 MTI DIST CO Check Number 59511 NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOC. 59511 05-Aug-99 NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOC. Totals Check Number 59511 NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOC. Transaction Amount 28.22 34.49 74.03 284.91 36.00 36.00 5.85 5.85 50.00 50.00 4«581.67 -183.27 4,398.40 10.00 10.00 85.86 85.86 35.00 35.00 Page 7 Comments GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE DARE GRADUATION CAKE UNEMPLOYMENT - J ROSS DOT MANUALS STATE SURCHARGE 6/99 ADM FEE 6/99 MEALS - TRAINING FILTERS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP i i 1 5 Aug 1999 Thu 3:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number 59518 59518 PIONEER 04-Aug-99 PIONEER 665.08 Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 59512 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 59512 04-Aug-99 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 108.00 AUGUST PERA LIFE Totals Check Number 59512 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 108.00 Check Number 59513 NSP 59513 05-Aug-99 NSP 155.43 HIGHWAY 12 a WILLOW 59513 05-Aug-99 NSP 684.45 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59513 05-Aug-99 NSP 9.42 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59513 05-Aug-99 NSP 297.57 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59513 05-Aug-99 NSP 30.84 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59513 05-Aug-99 NSP 441.30 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59513 05-Aug-99 NSP 1,692.08 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59513 05-Aug-99 NSP 890.35 ELECTRICAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 59513 NSP 4,201.44 Check Number 59514 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR • 59514 05-Aug-99 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR 174.50 CAR WASH TICKETS Totals Check Number 59514 O'SULLIVANS AUTO REPAIR 174.50 Check Number 59515 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC. 59515 04-Aug-99 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.14.28 CHIPS FOR RESALE 59515 04-Aug-99 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.15.12 ailPS FOR RESALE 59515 04-Aug-99 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.19.32 CHIPS FOR RESALE Totals Check Number 59515 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.48.72 Check Number 59516 PALMER, RALPH AND LYDIA 59516 OS-Aug-99 PALMER, RALPH AND LYDIA 6,377.90 EASEMENT-SAGA HILL Totals Check Number 59516 PALMER, RALPH AND LYDIA 6,377.90 Check Number 59517 PETTIT, SANDRA K. . 59517 05-Aug-99 PETTIT, SANDRA K.40.92 MILEAGE REIM Totals Check Number 59517 PETTIT. SANDRA K.40.92 Page 8 CAFR PUBLISHING t \ ‘i 1 5 Aug 1999 Thu 3:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59510 59518 59518 59518 59518 59518 59518 59510 PIONEER 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER Totals Check Number 59518 PIONEER Check Number 59519 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. 59519 59519 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC Totals Check Number 59519 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC Check Number 59520 RAINBOW COMPUTER FORMS 59520 04-Aug-99 RAINBOW COMPUTER FORMS Totals Check Number 59520 RAINBOW COMPUTER FORMS Check Number 59521 RC IDENTIFICATIONS 59521 05-Aug-99 RC IDENTIFICATIONS Totals Check Number 59521 RC IDENTIFICATIONS Check Number 59522 REED VENDING 59522 59522 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 REED VENDING REED VENDING Totals Check Number 59522 REED VENDING Check Number 59523 RICKS SUPERVALUE 59523 04-Aug-99 RICKS SUPERVALUE Totals Check Number 59523 RICKS SUPERVALUE Check Number 59524 RYDER STUDENT TRANSPORTATION 59524 05-Aug-99 RYDER STUDENT TRANSPORTATION Totals Check Number 59524 RYDER STUDENT TRANSPORTATION Transaction Amount 21.57 50.33 16.17 28.76 25.17 25.17 57.52 889.77 931.34 762.01 1,693.35 751.45 751.45 3.73 m m m m 3.73 54.90 47.20 102.10 30.78 30.78 120.00 120.00 •» Page 9 Comments APPLICATION 2479 APPLICATIONS AD FOR BIDS - MOWER SUBDIVISION SUBDIVISION SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS JANITORIAL SRVC 6/99 JANITORIAL SRVC 6/99 PERMIT INSP FORMS ID CARD - K JENSON CANDY FOR RESALE CANDY FOR RESALE CUPS, ICE TOWNHOUSE TOUR L 5 Aug 1999 Check Register Thu 3:07 PM City of Orono Check Tramsaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 59518 PIONEER 59518 05-Aug-99 PIONEER 21.57 APPLICATION 2479 59518 05-Aug-99 PIONEER 50.33 APPLICATIONS 59518 05-Aug-99 PIONEER 16.17 AD FOR BIDS - MOWER 59518 05-Aug-99 PIONEER 28.76 SUBDIVISION 59518 05-Aug-99 PIONEER 25.17 SUBDIVISION 59518 05-Aug-99 PIONEER 25.17 SUBDIVISI'^N 59518 05-Aug-99 PIONEER 57.52 APPLICATIwNS Totals Check Number 59518 PIONEER 889.77 Check Number 59519 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC 59519 59519 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. Totals Check Number 59519 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. Check Number 59520 RAINBOW COMPUTER FORMS 59520 04-Aug-99 RAINBOW COMPUTER FORMS Totals Check Number 59520 RAINBOW COMPUTER FORMS Check Number 59521 RC IDENTIFICATIONS 59521 05-Aug-99 RC IDENTIFICATIONS Totals Check Number 59521 RC IDENTIFICATIONS Check Number 59522 REED VENDING 59522 59522 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 REED VENDING REED VENDING Totals Check Number 59522 REED VENDING Check Number 59523 RICKS SUPERVALUE 59523 04-Aug-99 RICKS SUPERVALUE Totals Check Number 59523 RICKS SUPERVALUE Check Number 59524 RYDER student TRANSPORTATION 59524 05-Aug-99 RYDER STUDENT TRANSPORTATION Totals Check Number 59524 RYDER STUDENT TRANSPORTATION 931.34 762.01 1,693.35 751.45 751.45 3.73 3.73 54.90 47.20 102.10 30.78 30.78 120.00 120.00 Page 9 JANITORIAL SRVC 6/99 JANITORIAL SRVC 6/99 PERMIT INSP FORMS ID CARD - K JENSON CANDY FOR RESALE CANDY FOR PESALE CUPS, ICE TOWNHOUSE TOUR 5 Aug 1999 Thu 3;07 PM ChecA Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59533 59533 THORPE DIST CO. 04-Aug-99 THORPE DIST CO Totals Check Number 59533 THORPE DIST CO Check Number 59534 TREESCAPES 59534 05-Aug-99 TREESCAPES Totals Check Number 59534 TREESCAPES Check Number 59535 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 59535 04-Aug-99 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 59535 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Check Number 59537 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE Check Number 59538 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 59538 59538 59538 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 05-Aug-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Transaction Amount 121.50 121.50 2,235.99 2,235.99 1,800.00 1,800.00 39.14 929.80 30.99 Page 11 Comments BEER FOR RESALE FORESTRY CONSULT-APL 2492 POSTAGE FOR METER 55537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 5.60 LIFE INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 4.20 LIFE INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 23.80 LIFE INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 4.20 LIFE INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 1.40 LIFE INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 11.20 LIFE INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 2.80 LIFE INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 1.40 LIFE INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 21.75 LIFE INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE J41.55 LIFE INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 1.20 AD&D INS 8/9? 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 0.90 AD&D INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 5.10 ADAD INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 0.90 ADAD INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 0.30 ADAD INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 2.40 AD AD INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 0.60 AD AD INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 0.30 ADAD INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 9.75 AD AD INS 8/99 59537 05-Aug-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 76.95 ADAD INS 8/99 Totals Check Number 59537 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE LIFE 516.30 PHONE SERVICE PHONE SERVICE PHONE SERVICE f ■ f 5 Aug 1999 ^ Thu 3:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 12 Check Number Date Name Check Number 59538 59538 59538 59538 59538 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 05-Aug-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 05-Aug-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 05-Aug-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 05-Aug-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Totals Check Number 59538 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Check Number 59539 WIDMER INC 59539 05-Aug-99 WIDMER INC Totals Check Nun^er 59539 WIDMER INC Check Number 59540 WOLF, LANETTB 59540 05-Aug-99 WOLF, LANETTB Totals Check Number 59540 WOLF, LANETTB Check Number 59541 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 59541 59541 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Totals Check Number 59541 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Check Number 59542 YOUNG, JACKIE 59542 59542 59542 59542 59542 59542 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 04-Aug-99 Totals Check Number Grand Total Transaction Amount Comments 72.32 68.61 202.30 45.23 PHONE SERVICE PHONE SERVICE PHONE SERVICE PHONE SERVICE 1,388.39 217,147.91 217,147.91 RFP 81 ORONO OROl SAN SWR 175.00 175.00 COUNCIL MINUTES-7/12/99 19.74 9.00 ELECTRICAL SERVICE ELECTRICAL SERVICE 28.74 YOUNG,JACKIE 150.00 PARK COMM HINOTES 7/6/99 YOUNG,JACKIE 175.00 PLAN COMM MINUTES 7/19/99 YOUNG,JACKIE 200.00 COUCIL MINUTES 7/26/99 YOUNG,JACKIE 150.00 CONSOLIDATION MIN 7/15/99 YOUNG,JACKIE 150.00 CONSOLIDATION MIN 7/29/99 YOUNG,JACKIE 125.00 SPEC WKSP NVR MIN 7/22/99 YOUNG,JACKIE 950.00 438,572.89 J 5 Aug 1999 Thu 3:07 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 13 Finance User Initials RJO Thursday 5 August 1999 3:06 PM Start 3:07 PM Finish Buffer Name History Records Read 1178 Records Selected 184 Number of Pages 13 Selected by Check/receipt Date Equal To 09-Aug-99 And Check Number Greater Than 0 Sorted by Check Number Totals No Page Breaks i 4 J INFORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING h COHMCH MPfHlNQ Aue 0 9 »99 OF cu t ur UHUNU . f f 1 TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator August 6,1999 SUBJECT : City Administrator Vacation Plans I will be taking two extended weekends of vacation time in August. The first vacation period will be Thursday, August 12 through Monday, August 16. I will return on August 17. The second period will be fi’om Thursday, August 26 through Sunday, August 29. August 9,1999 To: Orono City Council, Informational Item From: Greg Gappa ^ The Orono Golf Course will be entering a golf cart in the Com Days parade to celebrate the 75th anniversary of the golf course. They will be distributing coupons for a $1.00 discount on a round of golf valid for the remainder of the season. I I »i 1964 Park Avenue Long Lake, MN. 55356 m Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department July 17,1999 OroDO City Council Members Long Lake City Council Members Medina City Council Members Dear Sir or Madam: Greetings! Attached is a recap of the second quarter (of 1999) for the Long Lake Volunteer Fire Depvtment. As you can see, we continued our busy pace over the months of April, May and June. Some hi^lights for foe quarter include: Commanlty Night Out - On June 19, we *1tosted ” a community ni^t out We took all of our vehicles and went to different areas of foe community and simply spent time wifo our Guests. I am pleased to report foat this was a great success! We took foe time to meet our Guests and, as appropriate, we gave them reflective numbers to identify their address. In many cases, we actually put foe number on foe mailbox at foe homeowner’s direction. Because of the success we had, we plan to do this once a year. New Utility Truck - During late April, we took delivery <m foe new Utility Trade, “Utility 11 ”. The truck is equipped wifo both fire fighting and rescue equipment It carries a team of four and will be used in a variety of incidents, including car accidents and small fires. In addition, foe newly determined standard apparanis color, red, diines bristly on this vehicle! Engine 12 -Engine 12 went in for iqxlating in mid June. We expect foe truck to be back by early August. While there are many updates to foe vehicle, some essential modifications include new red paint and foe installation of foam on foe vdiicle. Thank you, in advance, for your continued partnership. Sincerely, Steve Persian Fire ChieL Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department Prevention Through Commurdty Interaction ■ I -V— Long Lake Fire Department Second Quarter 1999 Activities Mectineii Hours Traininiis Hours Other Activities Hours Lake Region 15 Accountability 66 Saturdays/Evenings: United Firefighters 6 First Responder Refresher 188 Station Clean-up 6 Medina Council 2 Big Island Firefighting 69 Compartment labeling 20 Long Lake Council 2 Firefighting with Foam 54 New truck tasks 16 Second Call 6 Fiie/Rescue Scenarios 51 Agility Test 30 Planning (Officci’s)79 State Fire School 57 Community Night Out 60 Relief Association 71 Maple Plain Exercise 28 Equipment testing 4 Relief Trustee 24 EMT Classes 64 Sound system installation 16 Business 116 Total Hours 577 Engine 12 preparation 18 Total Hours 321 Engine 12 to Luveme 31 Fire/Mrdical/Rescuc Calb Hours Long I.okc Medina Mutual Aid Orono Total Hours 275 75 no 572 1,032 Medical standby at Schuman Buckhom Days Teambuilding exercise Memorial Day Robert Benson funeral Pool FiU Wobfeld Cabin dedication Total Hours 5 95 80 56 12 12 12 The second quarter continued a very busy year for llie fire department. Members volunteered 321 hours to plan deportment operations and trainings, direct the Relief Association and plan fundraising events. The second quarter provided many exceOent training activities, including the MN Stale Fire School in St. Paul, a multi-de|wtmcnt auto accident, veliiclc fire, auto extrication and medical exercise outside Maple Plain that simulated a multi-car pfle-up on Hwy. 12 under foggy conditions. Fust Responder Refresher classes, and Accountability training. Two members have also started the Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) class. Foam training was taught by an outside instructor utilizing our new utility truck (U-11) as a training tool. Volunteer acUvities included station clean-up, compartment labeling, preparing the new utility for service, preparation and testing of the new physical ability test, equipment testing, installation of a sound system in the fire house, preparing E-12 for lank repain and painting, medical stan<% at Schumann elementary and Buckhom Days, a Teambuilding exercise at Camp Diduhapi, Memorial Day activities, Robert Benson's funeral, a pool fill and the dedication of WoIsTetd Cabin in Medina. The number of caUs were up from the first quarter, 79 calb required 1,032 hours from department members. Mutual aid was both given (to Wayzata for a fire) and received (from Hamel for a house fire). Looking to the third quarter should give the members a little break with some Monday evenings with no activity planned in order for firefighlcra to spend some time with fanrUy and friends during the Minnesota summer. The department is planning to take the Studebaker, and possibly the new utility truck (U-l I), to three parades in July; Delano's Fourth of July Parade, Hamel's Rodeo Parade and the Watertown Fire Muster Parade. These ore good opportunities for the members to enjoy some comeraderie. show olTour equipment and build relaationships with surrounding communities and their fire departments. - TO: FROM: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:August 6,1999 SUBJECT: City Administrator Vacation Plans I will be taking two extended weekends of vacation time in August. The first vacation period will be Thursday, August 12 through Monday, August 16. I will return on August 17. The second period will be from Thursday, August 26 through Sunday, August 29. I-nmnilrttlhln REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 07/01/99 PERMIT TYPE Building SGL FAMILY-NEW SF-ADD/REMODEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COM-AOD/REMODEL INST-ADD/REMODEL DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechamical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING WOOD STOVE/FLUE FIREPLACE VENTILATION GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-total Plumbing FIXTURES SPRINKLER HATER METER VACUUM BREAKER Sub-total Sewer & Hater SEWER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTB DRNFLD &/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEWER DISCONNECT SEWER fc WATER UNDEFINED Stib-total Sign TEMPORARY Sub-total Fire FIRE SPRINKLER Sub-total User Defined land alteration LAWN SPRINKLER QTY 37 4 2 1 0 1 1 52* 18 2 1 8 1 6 2 2 40* 16 0 0 0 16* 0 7 0 0 1 1 0 9* 1 1* 1 1* 3 2 COUNCIL MEETING AUG 0 9 1999 JUNE 1999 Oi l Y Uh OliUNU *****PERMIT ISSUED REPORT ***** CITY OP ORONO -- CURRENT RANGE - 06/01/99 - 06/30/99 BASE PEE 15,826.00 7,888.00 470.25 100.00 87.25 0.00 30.00 668.50 25,070.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 911.25* 0.00 700.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 70.00 0.00 840.00* 0.00 0.00* 297.50 297.50* 150.00 70.00 VALUATION PLAN REVIEW «»1001,830-. 00 10,232.73 G01,051.-5Sfe^/^ 3,438.0:'. 27,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 0.00 0.00 65,000.00 3,499,501.55* 2,549.09 202,476.90 70.00 2,840.50 35.00 1,200.00 310.00 20,650.96 35.00 990.00 210.00 5,400.00 70.00 1,300.00 121.88 8,100.00 3,400.97*242,958.36* 911.25 53,600.00 0.00 0.00 O.OC 53,600.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 23,800.00 23,800.00* 0.00 0.00 305.6*:^o.ro 56. »1 0.00 P.OO 434.53 14,467.70* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 QTY 2 45 4 2 1 1 0 1 56* 11 3 1 6 2 1 1 0 25* 20 1 1 2 24* 7 5 1 7 1 1 1 23* 0 0* 0 0* 5 7 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 06/01/98 - 06/30/98 BASE FEE 8,274 7,889 1,157 100 287 902 0 358 18,968 .50 .00 .00 .00 .25 .25 .00 .75 .75* 1,072.23 105.00 35.00 330.63 70.00 35.00 35.00 0.00 1,682.86* 1,970.51 82.75 247.00 70.00 2,370.26* 245.00 500.00 50.00 7,000.00 35.00 70.00 0.00 7,900.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 225.00 245.00 VALUATION 1,800,000 546,519 101,700 0 19,800 103,000 0 25,500 2,596,519 .00 .91 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .91* 83,178 6,131 1,000 20,450 2,250 1,000 1,300 0 115,309 .44 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .44* 134,024.38 6,620.00 0.00 300.00 140,944.38* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 5,378.42 1,941.08 752.06 0.00 186.71 0.00 0.00 233.19 8,491.46* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* JUNE 1999 REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 07/01/99 *****PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OP ORONO *****PAGE: 2 REQUESTER: CAROLE -- CURRENT RANGE - 06/01/99 - 06/30/99 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 06/01/98 - 06/30/98 PERMIT TYPE Sub-total QTY 5* BASE PEE 220.00* VALUATION 0.00* PLAN REVIEW 0.00* QTY 12* BASE PEE 470.00* VALUATION 0.00* PLAN REVIEW 0.00* Grand-total 124**30,739.72** 3,819,859.91** 14,467.70**140**31,391.87** 2,852,773.73**8,491.46** . i 4 REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 07/01/99 BUILDING BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT FAIL IN ESCROW 25,070.00 14,467.70 1,741.27 0.00 1,050.00 137.25 0.00 0.00 REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 07/01/99 REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 30,739.72 PLAN REVIEW 14,467.70 SURCHARGE 1,909.38 Lie. SEARCH FEB 0.00 SAC 1,050.00 INVESTIGATION 237.25 DEPOSIT 0.00 MAIL IN 54.00 ESCROW 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL ■r „ 48,458.05 JUNE 1999 ***** MECHANICAL 3,400.97 0.00 122.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.50 0.00 PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 06/01/99 TO 06/30/99 ***** PLUMBING SEWER & WATER 911.25 0.00 27.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 840.00 0.00 4.50 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM Oe/oi/99 TO 06/30/99 ** *** USER 220.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 PAGE: 42 REQUESTER: CAROLE SIGN FIRE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 297.50 ; 0.00 < 11.90 0.00 0.00 I 0.00 m 0.00 1.50 0.00 MM PAGE: 4 REQUESTER: CAROLE THU, JUL 1, 1999, 7:42 AM PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OP PAGE 1 JUNE 1999 WORK ADDR 01 2845 01 3260 01 3480 01 4461 01 850 02 2659 02 793 02 500 02 405 03 1425 05 4665 06 3865 06 3559 06 2500 06 2560 06 793 09 170 09 473 10 1620 ii 2585 11 125 11 960 11 2697 11 2055 11 2967 11 3565 11 1932 11 2080 11 2565 11 275 11 2040 11 2707 11 2135 11 1380 11 3625 11 3615 11 595 16 3480 16 1130 17 540 19 865 21 760 29 40 29 3577 29 2496 29 1972 29 1065 29 2496 29 3085 29 1491 30 4198 30 280 52C OWNER LAST NM VALUATION WIKNER 457,000.00 RITTER 800,000.00 NUSBAUM 190,000.00 UBAN 252,000.00 CARLSON 1,100,000.00 STANDA 60,000.00 JOYNER 80,000.00 BENNETT 40,000.00 PRIBDEMAN 160,000.00 WHITWORTH 65,000.00 STBFFENSON 6,000.00 LARSON 1,620.00 WEHRMANN 2,750.00 PAURUS 16,000.00 KUMMEL 8,000.00 JOYNER 5,800.00 PRATE 21,000.00 FRITZ 4,000.00 ERICKSON 1,715.00 OLSON 6,200.00 NELSON 1,800.00 STENROUD 7,000.00 KANE 3,000.00 ANDERSON 5,500.00 ROZBBOOM 7,500.00 DUNN 4,800.00 MARON 5,500.00 CARLSON 5,100.00 BAYSHORB 5,400.00 HANSON 2,515.32 RILEY 7,000.00 KEEGAN 7,500.00 VALITON 5,300.00 SANDBERG 4,200.00 FINE 2,850.00 CODDON 2,850.00 WAGNER 2,000.00 NUSBAUM .00 BOCKMANN .00 STICKNEY .00 3,500.00 MARTIN 18,601.23 15,000.00 BELTER 5,000.00 CARLSON 7,000.00 HOLMLUND 12,000.00 SIMONSON 20,000.00 CARLSON 50,000.00 DOTZENROTH 4,000.00 KRIER 5,000.00 JORDAN 1,500.00 PARSONS 1,000.00 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY BOHNS PT LA NORTH SHORE DR BAYSIDE RD WILLOW DR N CASCO POINT RD FERNDALE RD N HANLON AVE WILLOW OR S BAY RIDGE RD WEST BRANCH RD SHORELINE DR LIVINGSTON AVE CASCO POINT RD DUNWOODY AVE FERNDALE RD N CRYSTAL CREEK RD TONKAWA RD SHADYWOOD RD LYDIARD AVE HACKBERRY HILL PARTENWOOD RD CASCO POINT RD SPATES AVE CASCO POINT RD WATERTOWN RD EAGERNESS POINT RD SHADYWOOD RD WOODHAVEN DR CRESTVIEW AVE WEBBER HILLS RD WALTERS PORT LA 6TH AVE N NORTH ARM DR LYRIC AVE LYRIC AVE OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N NORTH SHORE DR LOMA LINDA AVE WILLOW DR S FERNDALE RD N HUNT FARM RD TRUFFULA TR LIVINGSTON AVE OLD BEACH RD SHADYWOOD RD EOGEWOOD HILLS RD OLD BEACH RD CASCO POINT RD SHORELINE DR NORTH SHORE DR BIG ISLAND 99/06/17 99/06/09 99/06/16 99/06/17 99/06/29 99/06/29 99/06/28 99/06/29 99/06/29 99/06/17 99/06/10 99/06/07 99/06/04 99/06/01 99/06/14 99/06/15 99/06/21 99/06/28 99/06/09 99/06/02 99/06/04 99/06/04 99/06/04 99/06/07 99/06/07 99/06/07 99/06/08 99/06/14 99/06/14 99/06/14 99/06/15 99/06/17 99/06/18 99/06/22 99/06/28 99/06/28 99/06/30 99/06/02 99/06/28 99/06/11 99/06/15 99/06/01 99/06/08 99/06/02 99/06/03 99/06/08 99/06/15 99/06/17 99/06/11 99/06/29 99/06/08 99/06/16 OR-011484 OR-011488 OR-011542 OR-011561 OR-011591 OR-011312 OR-011590 OR-011596 OR-011601 OR-011528 OR-011504 OR-011397 OR-011416 OR-011467 OR-011523 OR-011527 OR-011562 OR-011584 OR-011501 OR-011483 OR-011489 OR-011490 OR-011491 OR-011493 OR-011494 OR-011495 OR-011498 OR-011522 OR-011525 OR-011531 OR-011538 OR-011564 OR-011568 OR-011577 OR-011587 OR-011588 OR-011603 OR-011469 OR-011592 OR-011521 OR-011526 OR-011464 OR-011412 OR-011477 OR-011486 OR-011497 OR-011518 OR-011519 OR-011520 OR-011600 OR-011496 OR-011535 14765999 18686262 14734954 14471035 14774325 14710532 14750918 14042984 14732588 15250625 00000000 00000000 00000000 14744165 16330139 13743222 15600103 00000000 17216628 15578678 00000000 19271086 14721321 14726539 14726539 14710413 15935325 15454233 14786813 00000000 14733397 18238046 15665377 14744568 19432610 19432610 14733397 14734954 13694543 00000000 14796990 15448761 00000000 14776189 15024777 00000000 17291944 14728745 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 HUNT KYLE & PARTNERS, INC PITCH ROBERT BETZ BUILDERS INC ORCHARD BUILDERS INC. EROTAS BUILDING CORORATION DANBERRY COMPANY BRUCE BREN HOMES METRO HANDYMAN LAKEWOOD DEVELOPMENT INSIDE & OUT REMODBLORS WALDENWOOD MORR CONSTRUCTION SOS HOMECARE ATLANTIS POOLS, INC. PANELCRAFT OF MINNESOTA RIGHT WAY ROOFING J. BENSON HINCK MIKE SMITH WF ROOFING SMITH WP ROOFING SCHMIDT ALLEN ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC TOWN & COUNTRY ROOFING DESLAURIBRS & SONS INC PLYMOUTH ROOFING SELA ROOFING DONNER CONST CO SASS CONSTRUCTION DOUG MCEVERS DOUG MCEVERS PLYMOUTH ROOFING BETZ BUILDERS INC TWO BROTHERS EXCAVATING HARLAN BOB LINDSTROM CONSTRUCTION HOWARD GORDY RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN GARDNER & ASSOCIATES JOHNSON KELLY CONST 52C THU, JUL 1, 1999, 7:42 AM PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET 1999 ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER PI 19 1050 TAMARACK DR 99/06/15 OR-011532 86364680 1C 1C ME 01 3510 BAYSIDE RD 99/06/02 OR-011480 35453797 01 650 NORTH ARM DR 99/06/02 OR-011481 35453797 01 4760 BAYSIDE RD 99/06/02 OR-011482 38940376 01 2697 KELLY AVE 99/06/03 OR-011487 35712525 01 2850 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 99/06/10 OR-011507 24701208 01 2905 DEER RUN TR 99/06/10 OR-011500 35453797 01 123 CHEVY CHASE DR 99/06/10 OR-011512 35360667 01 1700 SHORELINE DR 99/06/10 OR-011515 37886577 01 3286 NORTH SHORE DR 99/06/15 OR-Oll‘?36 36332561 01 3290 NORTH SHORE DR 99/06/15 OR-011537 36332561 01 2845 WEAR CIR 99/06/16 OR-011543 34748366 01 2650 KELLY AVE 99/06/16 OR-011545 39203800 01 2315 DEVIN LA 99/06/16 OR-011548 35453797 01 485 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 99/06/16 OR-011550 39296767 01 1655 BOHNS PT RD 99/06/16 OR-011557 37846100 01 3286 NORTH SHORE DR 99/06/16 OR-011558 35421166 01 2135 6TH AVE N 99/06/18 OR-011571 35421166 01 4590 NORTH ARM DR W 99/06/21 OR-011575 35350194 01 650 NORTH ARM DR 99/06/24 OR-011586 34282826 02 3770 BAYSIDE RD 99/06/10 OR-011510 33386606 02 205 NORTHGATE RD 99/06/10 OR-011513 37575040 02 1800 CONCORDIA ST 99/06/10 OR-011514 34791600 02 3630 EILEEN ST 99/06/15 OR-011540 34282826 02 1205 SHORELINE DR 99/06/16 OR-011553 00000000 02 1400 CHERRY PL 99/06/18 OR-011555 37575040 02 3090 NORTH SHORE DR 99/06/16 OR-011556 35421166 02 3683 NORTH SHORE DR 99/06/17 OR-011560 35603349 02 1998 SHADYWOOD RD 99/06/23 OR-011500 36332561 02 1910 SHADYWOOD RD 99/06/29 OR-011597 35360667 19 2190 WAYZATA BLVD 99/06/15 OR-011559 37813358 24 2250 LONGVIEW CIR 99/06/*l OR '1-517 34283677 24 2060 NORTH SHORE DR 9 ' 'OR JX1546 39296767 24 355 WOODHILL RD Q .011549 39414211 24 1370 FRENCH CREEK DR k/R-011552 39414211 24 2054 SHORELINE DR 99/06/16 OR-011554 39414211 24 250 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 99/06/18 OR-011570 35421166 24 2850 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 99/06/18 OR-011572 39296767 24 3508 IVY PL 99/06/18 OR-011573 37575040 24 2140 6TH AVE N 99/06/28 OR-011589 34458585 29 1520 MINNIE AVE 99/06/10 OR-011511 34791600 40C 40C PL 01 40 TRUFFULA TR 99/06/02 OR-011479 24340445 01 3286 NORTH SHORE DR 99/06/04 OR-011492 26826415 01 135 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 99/06/14 OR-011529 29337200 01 1800 CONCORDIA ST 99/06/14 OR-011530 28017974 01 2845 WEAR CIR 99/06/15 OR-011533 24730655 02 2850 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 99/06/10 OR-011506 24701208 02 2135 6TH AVE N 99/06/15 OR-011539 24701208 19 2160 WAYZATA BLVD 99/06/09 OR-011500 24738403 24 1910 SHADYWOOD RD 99/06/01 OR-011476 29337717 PAGE 2 OWNER LAST NM VALUATION 23,800.00 FIREPLACE CENTER FIREPLACE CENTER R & S HEATING AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO STEINKRAUS PLBG INC FIREPLACE CENTER MARSH HEATING & AIR COND RYBAK EXCAVATING & CONTRAC FIRESIDE CORNER FIRESIDE CORNER ABEL/B & C INC CRONSTROMS HTG & AC INC FIREPLACE CENTER VOGT FRED & CO SUBURBAN AIR CONDITIONING FLARE HTG & AC FLARE HTG & AC DEAN'S TANK OIL PRACTICAL SYSTEMS WOODLAND STOVES&FIREPLACES DEPENDABLE HTG & AC COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C PRACTICAL SYSTEMS DEPENDABLE HTG & AC FLARE HTG & AC DELMAR FURNACE EXCHANGE FIRESIDE CORNER MARSH HEATING & AIR COND MODERN HTG 6 AC, INC HEATING & COOLING TWO VOGT FRED & CO KLEVE HTG & AC KLEVB HTG & AC KLEVE HTG & AC FLARE HTG & AC VOGT FRED 6 CO DEPENDABLE HTG & AC RON'S MECH INC COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C CLEARWATER SYSTEMS D & M MECHANICAL CULLIGAN PLUMBING PLUS TIMS QUALITY PLUMBING STEINKRAUS PLBG INC STEINKRAUS PLBG INC DAY EARL W & SONS THOMPSON PLBG SOTOONOVER BARNUM CARPENTER SCHWARY STRAUMAN JACOBS YOUNG HOOK PORTMAN HAMM NEWMAN WAADE HAGLUND SCHOONOVER STEPHENS MORRISON HANSEN ILSE DEHOFF, JR ZULK RESSLER SOLTAU NASIEDLAK TORRISON GODFREY MCNELLIS HASSELQUIST OLSON WILSON PHILLIPS JENSEN POST WAADE GOODWALD HANSEN YOUNG CARPENTER VALITON WEAR MCMANUS 1,000.00 2,000.00 14.550.00 2,150.96 700.00 1,200.00 7.900.00 6.950.00 4.400.00 2.200.00 8,000.00 5.000. 00 3.000. 00 39.900.00 40.460.00 20,000.00 800.00 1.150.00 300.00 3.400.00 1,340.50 500.00 2.200.00 1.000. 00 4,316.90 200.00 1,000.00 2,500.00 990.00 25,000.00 5,000.00 2.650.00 3.400.00 4.200.00 3,800.00 1.500.00 6.100.00 3.900.00 1.500.00 6.800.00 1,100.00 22,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 7.400.00 500.00 1.900.00 769.00 3.200.00 THU, JUL 1, ^999, 7:42 AM PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OP JUNE PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET 1999 ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM PAGE 3 VALUATION PL 24 2080 SPATES AVE 99/06/02 OR-011478 24738793 CITYVIEW PLBG & HTG MORRIS 3,000.00 24 2250 LONGVIEW CIR 99/06/09 OR-011499 24490147 CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC.TORRISON 500.00 24 3820 NORTH SHORE DR 99/06/10 OR-011505 28274033 NORBLOM PLUMBING CO HAAS 1,000.00 24 1100 HERITAGE LA 99/06/16 OR-011544 28274033 NORBLOM PLUMBING CO RETZLER 400.00 24 1406 BOHNS PT RD 99/06/22 OR-011579 28828681 WELTER & BLAYLOCK INC CHAPMAN 2,800.00 24 1153 ELMWOOD AVE 99/06/23 OR-011581 27539244 SHILOAH WATER COMPANY, INC HEIT 600.00 24 2496 OLD BEACH RD 99/06/24 OR-011585 29335669 CHERRY PLBG & HTG CARLSON 6,500.00 16C 16C SI 19 2160 WAYZATA BLVD 99/06/02 OR-011470 00000000 WEAR .00 1C 1C sw 01 123 CHEVY CHASE DR 99/06/01 OR-011475 24724959 WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS .00 01 45 CRISTOFORI CIR 99/06/14 OR-011516 54673439 DH EXCAVATING INC .00 01 40 TRUFFULA TR 99/06/14 OR-011524 54612100 DASEN CONTRACTING CO INC POST .00 01 4375 BAYSIDE RD 99/06/17 OR-011563 54425855 SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES WHITE .00 01 60 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 99/06/18 OR-011565 54791762 HAYES EXCAVATING .00 01 140 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 99/06/18 OR-011566 54791762 HAYES EXCAVATING .00 01 940 BROWN RD S 99/06/18 OR-011567 54791762 HAYES EXCAVATING JOHNSTON .00 01 4760 BAYSIDE RD 99/06/18 OR-011569 54791762 HAYES EXCAVATING BARNUM .00 01 2683 CASCO POINT RD 99/06/24 OR-011582 24724959 WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS ERICKSON .00 9C 9C UD 01 320 TURNHAM RD 99/06/15 OR-011534 15290710 IMPACT DESIGNS ZELINSKY .00 01 650 BROWN RD N 99/06/28 OR-011541 00000000 GARRETT .00 01 170 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 99/06/18 OR-011574 84792585 GENERAL SERVICE FRATE .00 01 40 TRUFFULA TR 99/06/22 OR-011576 86840222 HOME SERSVICE IRRIGATION POST .00 01 1135 NORTH ARM DR 99/06/24 OR-011583 00000000 WEILER .00 5C 5C 124C 3,819,859.91* 4 THU, JUL 1," 1999, 7:40 AM NUMERICAL LISTING PAGE 1 JUNE 1999 PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION OR-011312 OR-011397 OR-011412 OR-011416 OR-011464 OR-011467 OR-011469 OR-011470 OR-011475 OR-011476 OR-011477 OR-011478 OR-011479 OR-011480 OR-011481 OR-011482 OR-011483 OR-011484 OR-011486 OR-011487 OR-011488 OR-011489 OR-011490 OR-011491 OR-011492 OR-011493 OR-011494 OR-011495 OR-011496 OR-011497 OR-011498 OR-011499 OR-011500 OR-011501 OR-011504 OR-011505 OR-011506 OR-011507 OR-011508 OR-011510 OR-011511 OR-011512 OR-011513 OR-011514 OR-011515 OR-011516 OR-011517 OR-011518 OR-011519 OR-011520 OR-011521 OR-011522 OR-011523 OR-011524 99/06/29 N 2659 99/06/07 N 3865 99/06/08 N 40 99/06/04 N 3559 99/06/01 N 760 99/06/01 N 2500 99/06/02 N 3480 99/06/02 N 2160 99/06/01 N 123 99/06/01 N 1910 99/06/02 N 3577 99/06/02 N 2080 99/06/02 N 40 99/06/02 N 3510 99/06/02 N 650 99/06/02 N 4760 99/06/02 N 2585 99/06/17 N 2845 99/06/03 N 2496 99/06/03 N 2697 99/06/09 N 3260 99/06/04 N 125 99/06/04 N 960 99/06/04 N 2697 99/06/04 N 3286 99/06/07 N 2055 99/06/07 N 2967 99/06/07 N 3565 99/06/08 N 4198 99/06/08 N 1972 99/06/08 N 1932 99/06/09 N 2250 99/06/09 N 2160 99/06/09 N 1620 99/06/10 N 4665 99/06/10 N 3820 99/06/10 N 2850 99/06/10 N 2850 99/06/10 N 2905 99/06/10 N 3770 99/06/10 N 1520 99/06/10 N 123 99/06/10 N 205 99/06/10 N 1800 99/06/10 N 1700 99/06/14 N 45 99/06/11 N 2250 99/06/15 N 1065 99/06/17 N 24 96 99/06/11 N 3085 99/06/11 N 540 99/06/14 N 2080 99/06/14 N 2560 99/06/14 N 40 CASCO POINT RD SHORELINE DR TRUPFULA TR LIVINGSTON AVE HUNT FARM RD CASCO POINT RD NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA BLVD CHEVY CHASE DR SHADYWOOD RD LIVINGSTON AVE SPATES AVE TRUPFULA TR BAYSIDE RD NORTH ARM DR BAYSIDE RD LYDIARD AVE LITTLE ORCHARD WAY OLD BEACH RD KELLY AVE BOHNS PT LA HACKBERRY HILL PARTENWOOD RD CASCO POINT RD NORTH SHORE DR SPATES AVE CASCO POINT RD WATERTOWN RD NORTH SHORE DR SHADYWOOD RD EAGERNESS POINT RD LONGVIEW CIR WAYZATA BLVD SHADYWOOD RD WEST BRANCH RT NORTH SHORE DR LITTLE ORCHARD WAY LITTLE ORCHARD WAY DEER RUN TR BAYSIDE RD MINNIE AVE CHEVY CHASE DR NORTHGATE RD CONCORDIA ST SHORELINE DR CRISTOFORI CIR LONGVIEW CIR EDGEWOOD HILLS RD OLD BEACH RD CASCO POINT RD WILLOW DR S SHADYWOOD RD DUNWOODY AVE TRUPFULA TR 02 06 29 06 21 06 16 19 01 24 29 24 01 01 01 01 11 01 29 01 01 11 11 11 01 11 11 11 30 29 11 24 19 10 05 24 02 01 01 02 29 01 02 02 01 01 24 29 29 29 17 11 06 01 14710532 00000000 00000000 00000000 15448761 14744165 14734954 00000000 24724959 29337717 14776189 24738793 24340445 35453797 35453797 38940376 15578678 14765999 15024777 35712525 18686262 00000000 19271086 14721321 26826415 14726539 14726539 14710413 00000000 00000000 15935325 24490147 24738403 17216628 00000000 28274033 24701208 24701208 35453797 33386606 34791600 35360667 37575040 34791600 37886577 54673439 34283677 17291944 14728745 00000000 00000000 15454233 16330139 54612100 DANBERRY COMPANY STANDA LARSON LINDSTROM CONSTRUCTION WALDENWOOD BETZ BUILDERS INC WEHRMANN MARTIN PAURUS NUSBAUM WEAR WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS THCMPSON PLBG HOWARD GORDY CITYVIEW PLBG & HTG CLEARWATER SYSTEMS FIREPLACE CENTER FIREPLACE CENTER R & S HEATING RIGHT WAY ROOFING HUNT KYLE & PARTNERS, RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO FITCH ROBERT INC MCMANUS BELTER MORRIS POST CRAIG SCHOONOVER BARNUM OLSON WIKNER CARLSON J. BENSON HINCK MIKE D & M MECHANICAL SMITH WP ROOFING SMITH WP ROOFING SCHMIDT ALLEN ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC. DAY EARL W & SONS PANELCRAFT OP MINNESOTA NORBLCM PLUMBING CO STEINKRAUS PLBG INC STEINKRAUS PLBG INC FIREPLACE CENTER WOODLAND STOVES&FIREPLACES COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C MARSH HEATING & AIR COND DEPENDABLE HTG & AC COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C RYBAK EXCAVATING & CONTRAC DH EXCAVATING INC HEATING & COOLING TWO GARDNER & ASSOCIATES JOHNSON KELLY CONST RITTER NELSON STENROUD KANE WAADE ANDERSON ROZEBOOM DUNN JORDAN HOLMLUND MARON TORRISON WEAR ERICKSON STBFPENSON HAAS CARPENTER CARPENTER SCHWARY STEPHENS JENSEN STRAUMAN MORRISON HANSEN JACOBS TOWN & COUNTRY ROOFING MORR CONSTRUCTION DASEN CONTRACTING CO INC TORRISON SIMONSON CARLSON DOTZENROTH STICKNEY CARLSON KUMMBL POST 60,000.00 1,620.00 15.000. 00 2.750.00 18,601.23 16.000. 00 .00 .00 .00 3.200.00 5.000. 00 3.000. 00 1.100.00 1.000. 00 2,000.00 14,550.00 6,200.00 457.000. 00 7,000.00 2,150.96 800.000. 00 1,800.00 7.000. 00 3.000. 00 22,000.00 5.500.00 7.500.00 4.800.00 1.500.00 12,000.00 5.500.00 500.00 700.00 1.715.00 6.000. 00 1,000.00 500.00 700.00 1.200.00 3.400.00 6.800.00 7.900.00 1,340.50 500.00 6.950.00 .00 5.000. 00 20,000.00 50,000.00 4.000. 00 .00 5.100.00 8.000. 00 .00 THU, JUL 1, 1999, 7:40 AM NUMERICAL LISTING JUNE 1999 PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 2 WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION OR-011525 OR-011526 OR-011527 OR-011528 OR-011529 OR-011530 OR-011531 OR-011532 OR-011533 OR-011534 OR-011535 OR-011536 OR-011537 OR-O11536 OR-011539 OR>011540 OR-011541 OR>011542 OR-011543 OR-011544 OR-011545 OR-011546 OR-011548 OR-011549 OR-011550 OR-011552 OR-011553 OR-011554 OR-011555 OR-0.11558 OR-011557 OR-011558 OR-011559 OR-011560 OR-011561 OR-011562 OR-011563 OR-011564 OR-011585 OR-011566 OR-011567 OR-011568 OR-011569 OR-011570 OR-011571 OR-011572 OR-011573 OR-011574 OR-011575 OR-011576 OR-011577 OR-011579 OR-011580 OR-011581 99/06/14 N 99/06/15 N 99/06/15 N 99/06/17 N 99/06/14 N 99/06/14 N 99/06/14 N 99/06/15 N 99/06/15 N 99/06/15 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/15 N 99/06/15 N 99/06/15 N 99/06/15 N 99/06/15 N 99/06/28 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/18 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/16 N 99/06/15 N 99/06/17 N 99/06/17 N 99/06/21 N 99/06/17 N 99/06/17 N 99/06/18 N 99/06/18 N 99/06/18 N 99/06/18 N 99/06/18 N 99/06/18 N 99/06/18 N 99/06/18 N 99/06/18 N 99/06/18 N 99/06/21 N 99/06/22 N 99/06/22 N 99/06/22 N 99/06/23 N '06/23 N 2565 WOODHAVEN DR 865 FERNDALE RD N 793 FERNDALE RD N 1425 BAY RIDGE RD 135 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 1800 CONCORDIA ST 275 CRESTVIEW AVB 1050 TAMARACK DR 2845 WEAR CIR 320 TURNHAM RD 280 DIG ISLAND 3286 NORTH SHORE DR 3290 NORTH SHORE DR 2040 WEBBER HILLS RD 2135 6TH AVE N 3630 EILEEN ST 650 DROWN RD N 3480 NORTH SHORE DR zR45 WEAR CIR 1100 HERITAGE LA 2650 KELLY AVB 2060 NORTH SHORE DR 2315 DEVIN LA 355 WOODHILL RD 485 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 1370 FRENCH CREEK DR 1205 SHORELINE DR 2054 SHORELINE DR 1400 CHERRY PL 3090 NORTH SHORE DR 1655 BOHNS PT RD 3286 NORTH SHORE DR 2190 WAYZATA BLVD 3683 NORTH SHORE DR 4461 BAYSIDE RD 170 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 4375 BAYSIDE RD 2707 WALTERS PORT LA 80 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 140 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 940 DROWN RD S 2135 6TH AVE N 4760 BAYSIDE RD 250 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD 2135 6TH AVE N 2850 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 3508 IVY PL 170 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 4590 NORTH ARM DR W 40 TRUFFULA TR 1380 NORTH ARM DR 1406 BOHNS PT RD 1998 SHADYWOOD RD 1153 ELMWOOD AVE 11 14786813 19 14796990 06 13743222 03 15250625 01 29337200 01 28017974 11 00000000 19 86364680 01 24730655 01 15290710 30 00000000 01 36332561 01 36332561 11 14733397 02 24701208 02 34282826 01 00000000 01 14734954 01 34748366 24 28274033 01 39203800 24 39296767 01 35453797 24 39414211 01 39296767 24 39414211 02 00000000 24 39414211 02 37575040 02 35421166 01 37846100 01 35421166 19 37813358 02 35603349 01 14471035 09 15600103 01 54425855 11 18238046 01 54791762 01 54791762 01 54791762 11 15665377 01 54791762 24 35421166 01 35421166 24 39296767 24 37575040 01 84792585 01 35350194 01 86840222 11 14744568 24 28828681 02 36332561 24 275"’‘>244 DESLAURIBRS & SONS INC HARLAN BOB SOS HOMECARE INSIDE & OUT REMODELORS CULLIGAN PLUMBING PLUS VIKING AUTOMATIC TIMS QUALITY PLUMBING IMPACT DESIGNS FIRESIDE CORNER FIRESIDE CORNER PLYMOUTH ROOFING STBINKRAUS PLBG INC PRACTICAL SYSTEMS BETZ BUILDERS INC ABEL/B & C INC NORBLOM PLUMBING CO CRONSTROMS HTG & AC INC VOGT FRED & CO FIREPLACE CENTER KLEVE HTG & AC VOGT FRED & CO KLEVE HTG & AC KLEVE HTG & AC DEPENDABLE HTG 6 AC FLARE HTG & AC SUBURBAN AIR CONDITIONING FLARE HTG & AC MODERN HTG & AC, INC DEU4AR FURNACE EXCHANGE ORCHARD BUILDERS INC. ATLANTIS POOLS, INC. SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICES SBLA ROOFING HAYES EXCAVATING HAYES EXCAVATING HAYES EXCAVATING DONNER CONST CO HAYES EXCAVATING FLARE HTG 6 AC FLARE HTG & AC VOGT FRED & CO DEPENDABLE HTG & AC GENERAL SERVICE DEAN'S TANK OIL HOME SERSVICE IRRIGATION SASS CONSTRUCTION WELTER & BLAYLOCK INC FIRESIDE CORNER SHILOAH WATER COMPANY, INC BAYSHORB 5.400.00 3.500.00 JOYNER 5,800.00 WHITWORTH 65,000.00 GOODWALD 1,000.00 HANSEN 1,000.00 HANSON 2,515.32 23,800.00 YOUNG 7,400.00 ZELINSKY .00 PARSONS 1,000.00 4.400.00 2.200.00 RILEY 7,000.00 VALITON 1,900.00 ILSB 2,200.00 GARRETT .00 NUSBAUM .190,000.00 YOUNG 8,000.00 RBTZLER 400.00 HOOK 5.000.00 GODFREY 2,650.00 PORTMAN 3,000.00 MCNBLLIS 3,400.00 HAMM 39,900.00 HASSELQUIST 4,200.00 DEHOFF, JR 1,000.00 OLSON 3,800.00 ZULK 4,316.90 200.00 NEWMAN 40,460.00 WAADE 20,000.00 25,000.00 RESSLER 1,000.00 UBAN 252,000.00 FRATE 21,000.00 WHITF .00 KEEGAN 7,500.00 .00 .00 JOHNSTON .00 VALITON 5.300.00 BARNUM .00 1.500.00 800.00 6.100.00 WILSON 3.900.00 FRATE .00 HAGLUND 1,150.00 POST .00 SANDBERG 4,200.00 CHAPMAN 2,800.00 SOLTAU 2,500.00 HEIT 600.00• THU, JUL' 1,* x999, 7:40 AM NUMERICAL PERMIT NBR LISTING ISSUED CANCEL ADDR JUNE 1999 NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER OR-011582 99/06/24 N 2683 CASCO POINT RD 01 24724959 OR-011583 99/06/24 N 1135 NORTH ARM DR 01 00000000 OR-011584 99/06/28 N 473 TONKAWA RD 09 00000000 OR-011585 99/06/24 N 2496 OLD BEACH RD 24 29335669 OR-011586 99/06/24 N 650 NORTH ARM DR 01 34282826 OR-011587 99/06/28 N 3625 LYRIC AVE 11 19432610 OR-011588 99/06/28 N 3615 LYRIC AVE 11 19432610 OR-011589 99/06/28 N 2140 6TH AVE N 24 34458585 OR-011590 99/06/28 N 793 PERNDALE RD N 02 14750918 OR-011591 99/06/29 N 850 WILLOW DR N 01 14774325 OR-011592 99/06/28 N 1130 LOMA LINDA AVE 16 13694543 OR-011596 99/06/29 N 500 HANLON AVE 02 14042984 OR-011597 99/06/29 N 1910 SHADYWOOD RD 02 35360667 OR-011600 99/06/29 N 1491 SHORELINE DR 29 00000000 OR-011601 99/06/29 N 405 WILLOW DR S 02 14732588 OR-011603 99/06/30 N 595 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 11 14733397 OWNER LAST NM PAGE 3 VALUATION ERICKSON .00 WEILER .00 FRITZ 4,000.00 CARLSON 6,500.00 SCHOONOVER 300.00 FINE 2,850.00 CODDON 2,850.00 PHILLIPS 1,500.00 JOYNER 80,000.00 CARLSON 1,100,000.00 BOCKMANN .00 BENNETT 40,000.00 NASIEDLAK 990.00 KRIER 5,000.00 PRIEDEMAN 160,000.00 WAGNER 2,000.00 124C WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS CHERRY PLBG & HTG PRACTICAL SYSTEMS DOUG MCEVERS DOUG MCEVERS RON'S MECH INC BRUCE BREN HOMES EROTAS BUILDING CORORATION TWO BROTHERS EXCAVATING METRO HANDYMAN MARSH HEATING & AIR COND LAKEWOOD DEVELOPMENT PLYMOUTH ROOFING *-4'' ^ •» ■ •, r 01 Residence 24 02 Addition 25 03 Gara'ge/A tt a ched 2604Garage/Detached .27 05 Porch 2806Deck29 07 Fence 30 08 Gazebo 31 09 Pool 3210Re-side 33 11 Re-roof 3412Tennis Court 13 Sign 14 Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accessory Structure 18 Move 19 Commercial 20 Institutional 21 Storm Damage Repair221-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined 9999 Replacing Existing Lifting Principal Residence Well Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renovate/Remodel Accessory Structure Stairway to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monuments Tree Removal . LOCAL DSB CODES Undefined • • • REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 07/01/99 PERMIT TYPE User Defined VARIANCE CUP VARIANCE/CUP VACATION Sub-total Grand-total REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 07/01/99 JUNE 1999 ***** permit ISSUED REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE 06/01/99 - RANGE . . . . 06/30/99 06/01/98 - RANGE . . . . 06/30/90 ‘Y BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 2,050.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 175.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 225.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 300.00 0.00 0.00 0*0.00*0.00*0.00*13*2,750.00*0.00*0.00* 0**0.00**0.00**0.00**13#*2,750.00**0.00**0.00** ***** permit FEE REPORT ***** CITY OP ORONO PROM 06/01/99 TO 06/30/99 USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEB 0.00 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 0.00 0.00 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE REPORT NBR. DATE OP RUN BPRMTISS-1 07/01/99 PERMIT TYPE Building SQL FAMILY-NEW DUPLEX-NEW SP-AOD/REMODEL SP-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COMMERCIAL-NEW COM-ADD/REMODBL COM-ACC STRUCTUR INST-ADD/RBMODEL DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITICMING WOOD STOVE/PLUE FIREPLACE VENTILATION FUEL STORAGE GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK S\ib-total Plumbing FIXTURES SPRINKLER WATER METER VACUUM BREAKER Stib-total Sewer & Water SEWER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE DRNFLD fc/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEPTIC CONNECTIN SEWER DISCONNECT SEWER REPAIR SEWER & WATER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sign PBRMANENT/POSTBD PER./FREE STANDG TEMPORARY Sub-total QTY 19 1 144 16 11 1 5 0 1 3 2 203* 61 3 2 35 6 1 11 4 4 127* 78 1 4 0 83* 5 13 0 2 0 2 3 3 0 28* 1 1 2 4* COUNCIL MEETING AUG 0 9 1999 YEAR-TO-DATE ***** CITY OF OhOiyO - - - - CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/99 - 06/30/99 PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO BASE FEB 47,430 1,637 38,265 2,205 670 3,099 1,321 0 74 90 868 95,662 .50 .25 .25 .50 .00 .75 .25 .00 .75 .00 .25 .50* 7,885 105 72 1,619 267 312 425 198 2,532 13,419 .85 .00 .50 .39 .50 .50 .00 .75 .55 .04* 7,057.16 93.75 680.00 0.00 7,830.91* 175 1,170 0 2,100 0 105 105 210 0 3,865 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00* 48.50 21.00 35.00 104.50* VALUATION 8,209,361 250.000 3,420,162 136,410 0 550.000 101,400 0 3,000 0 77,600 12,747,933 .55 .00 .24 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .79* 616, 4. 4, 96, 13, 25, 13, 10, 199, 982, 195.90 340.50 200.00 346.96 690.00 000.00 400.00 000.00 583.79 757.15* 483,698.00 7,500.00 0.00 0.00 491,198.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 1,500.00 450.00 0.00 1,950.00* PLAN REVIEW 30,775 1,064 16,458 1,328 0 2,014 810 0 0 0 • 564 53,015 .68 .21 .36 .13 .00 .84 .23 .00 .00 .00 .37 .82* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* *****PAGE: 1 REQUESTER7 CAROLE -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/98 - 06/30/98 QTY BASE FEE VALUATION 16 40,516.00 7,280,976.00 0 0.00 0.00 178 44,304.00 3,961,720.75 17 5,961.50 649,680.00 10 530.00 0.00 1 6,365.25 1,492,000.00 4 646.75 41,875.00 4 1,427.50 109,000.00 2 902.25 122,480.00 3 90.00 0.00 9 2,116.75 149,832.00 244^102,860.00*13,807,563.75* 47 7,060.61 556,193.44 10 591.82 44,276.52 2 70.00 3,000.00 43 1,907.69 111,715.00 5 175.00 7,400.00 0 0.00 0.00 5 175.00 5,659.00 11 398.75 17,133.00 3 105.00 1,750.00 126*10,483.87*747,126.96* 95 8,211.22 573,853.38 1 82.75 6,620.00 5 1,179.00 0.00 3 105.00 450.00 104*9,577.97*580,923.38* 23 805.00 0.00 19 1,850.00 0.00 2 100.00 0.00 20 18,250.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 1 35.00 750.00 1 70.00 0.00 *1 0.00 0.00 69^21,195.00*750.00* 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 35.00*0.00* PLAN REVIEW 26,335 0 19,228 3,807 0 4,137 202 105 0 0 1,356 55,172 .36 .00 .80 .39 .00 .41 .15 .46 .00 .00 .38 .95* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* YEAR-TO-DATE REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUM 07/01/99 ***** permit issued report CITY OP ORONO *****PAGE: 2 REQUESTER: CAROLE 4 PERMIT TYPE Pire PIRE SPRINKLER PIRE SPRINKLER Sub-total User Defined LAND ALTERATION DOCKS LAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total Grand-total _ _ _— _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _PBEVTOUS RANGE —-- - -- 01/01/99 - KAHUe - - - - - 06/30/99 01/01/98 - 06/30/98 QTY BASE PEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY‘BASE PEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 1 3 4* 297.50 1,698.88 1,996.38* 23,800.00 135,550.00 159,350.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 1 1* 0.00 3,650.00 3,650.00* 0.00 292.000. 00 292.000. 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 8 1 5 14* 380.00 30.00 175.00 585.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 12 0 10 22* 600.00 0.00 350.00 950.00* 500.00 0.00 0.00 500.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 463**123,463.33** 14,,383,188.94**53,015.82**567**148,751.84**15,428,864.09**55 ,172.95** i REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 07/01/99 BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL BUILDING 95,662.50 53,015.82 6,346.68 0.00 5,250.00 4,314.50 0.00 0.00 164,589.50 REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 07/01/99 REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 123,463.33 PLAN REVIEW 53,015.82 SURCHARGE 7,187.56 Lie. SEARCH PEE 0.00 SAC 5,250.00 INVESTIGATION 4,464.50 DEPOSIT 0.00 m,.aL in 174.62 ESCROW 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 193,555.03 YEAR-TO-DATE ***** PERMIT FEE REPORT ***** CITY OP ORONO FROM 01/01/99 TO 06/30/99 MECHANICAL 13,419.04 0.00 493.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122.62 0.00 14,035.62 PLUMBING 7,830.91 0.00 250.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.00 0.00 8,124.70 SEWER & WATER 3,865.00 0.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 3,978.00 *****PERMIT FEE REPORT ***** CITY OP ORONO FROM 01/01/99 TO 06/30/99 USER 585.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 640.50 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE SIGN 104.50 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 106.75 FIRE 1,996.38 0.00 79.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 0.00 2,080.76 PAGE: 2 REQUESTER: CAROLE •-;r- REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 07/01/99 *****PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO YEAR-TO-DATE *****PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE -- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/99 - 06/30/99 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/98 - 06/30/98 PERMIT TYPE User Defined LAND ALTERATION nocKQ LAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total Gramd-total QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 8 380.00 0.00 0.00 12 600.00 500.00 0.00 1 30.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 175.00 0.00 0.00 10 350.00 0.00 0.00 14*585.00*0.00^0.00*22*950.00*500.00*0.00* 14**585.00**O.OO**0.00**22**950.00**500.00**0.00** . / REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 07/01/99 ***** permit fee report ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/99 TO 06/30/99 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 15,300.00 15,300.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PBIWIT TOTAL 15,300.00 15,300.00 \719 RECAP OF CORTRACT CITIES January February Marrh April May June July August September October November Deceirber YTD Totals Spring Park Plan Review 40.46 274.14 b 00 2,760.22 2,063.10 1,576.90 6,714.82 Inspections 120.00 45.00 195..TO 135.00 135.00 180.00 655.00 Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 150.00 TOTAL 1S5.46 344.14 220.00 2,920.22 2,223.10 1,781.90 7,674.82 No. Plan Reviews 1 1 0 4 4 4 14 No. Inspections 8 3 13 9 9 12 54 Minnetonka Beach Plan Review 568.59 0.00 72.96 326.79 787.80 739.21 2,495.35 Inspections 60.00 45.00 150.00 135.00 60.00 180.00 630.00 Retaifier 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 150.00 TOTAL 653.59 70.00 247.96 486.79 872.80 944.21 3,275.35 No. Plan Reviews 1 0 1 1 2 1 6 No. Inspections 4 3 10 9 4 12 42 839.05 414.14 467.96 3,407.01 3,095.90 2,726.11 10,950.17 i 1 • August 9,1999 To: Orono City Council, Informational Item From: Greg Gappa ^ (.U6 0 9 «99 The Oro**o Golf Course will be entering a golf cart in the Com Days parade to celebrate the 75th anniversary of the golf course. They will be distributing coupons for a $1.00 discount on a round of golf valid for the remainder of the season. ! • i 1964 Park Avenue LengLake, MN. 55356 Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department July 17.1999 Orono City Council Members I,ong Lake City Council Members Medina City Council Members COUNCIL MEETING AUG 0 9 1999 CITY OF OHONO Dear Sir or Madam: Greetings! Attadied is a recap of the second quarter (of 1999) for die Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department. As you can see, we continued our busy pace over the months of April, May and June. Some highli^ts for the quarter include: Commanity Night Out - On June 19, we “hosted ” a conummity night out We took all of our vehicles and went to different areas of the community and simply spent time with our Guests. I am pleased to report that this was a great success! We took the time to meet our Guests and, as appropriate, we gave them reflective numbers to identify their undress. In many cases, we actually put the number on the mailbox at the homeowner ’s direction. Because of the success we had, we plan io do this once a year. New Utility Truck - During L'»ie April, we took delivery on the new Utility Truck, “Lftility 11”. The truck is equipped with both fire fighting and rescue equipment It carries a icum of four and will be used in a variety of incidents, including car accidents and small fires. In addition, the newly determined standard apparatus color, red, shines brightly on this vehicle! Engine 12 - Engine 12 went m for updating in mid June. We expect foe truck to be back by early August While there are many updates to foe vdiicle, some essential modifications include new red paint and foe installation of foam on foe vehicle. Thank you, in advance, for your continued partnership. Sincerely, Steve Persian Fire Cbiefi Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department Prevention Through Community biteraction Long Loke Fire Department Second Quarter 1999 Activities Meetings __________ Hours Lake Region 13 United rucfighlers 6 Medina Council 2 Long Lake Council 2 Second Call 6 Planning (Officer’s) 79 Relief Association 71 RclicfTrustees 24 Business 116 Total Hours 321 Trainings Hours Accountability 66 First Responder Refresher 188 Big Island Firefighting 69 Firefighting with Foam 54 Hre/Rescue Scenarios SI State Fire School 37 Maple PWn Exercise 28 EMT Classes 64 Total Hours 577 Other Activities Saturdays/Evenings: Station Clean-up Comportment labeling New truck tasks Agility Test Community Night Out Equipment testing Sound system installation Engine 12 preparation Engine 12 to Luveme Medical standby at Schuman Duckhora Days Teambuilding erorcise Memorial Day Robert Benson funeral Pool Fill Wolsfeld Cabin dedication Hours 6 20 16 30 60 4 16 18 31 5 95 80 56 12 12 12 Fire/Medical/Rtscue Calb Hours Long l^e 275 Medina 75 Mutual Aid 110 Orono 372 Total Hours 1.032 Total Hours The quarts continued a very busy year for the fire deportment. Members volunteered 321 hours to plan deportment operations and tr^ings, direct the ReUef Association and plan fundraising events. The second quarter provided many exceUent training activities, including the MN Slate Fire School in St. Paul, a multi-dci^ent auto accident, vehicle fire, auto extrication and medical exercise outside Maple Plain that simulated a multi-car pile-up on Hrvy. 12 under foggy conditions, Fu« Responder Refiresher and Accountability training. Two members have also started the Emagency Medical Technician (EMT) class. Foam training was taught by an outside instnictor utilizing our new utility truck (U-11) as a training tool. Volunteer activities included station clean-up, comportment labeling, preparing the new utility for service, preparation and testing of the new physical ability test, equipment testing, installation of a sound system in the fire house, preparing E-12 for tank repairs and painting, medical standby at Schumann elementary and Buckhom Days, a Teambuilding exercise at Camp Diduhapi, Memorial Day activities, Robert Benson's funeral, a pool fill and the dedication of Wolsfeld Cabin in Medina. The number of colls were up from the fust quarter, 79 caUs required 1,(132 hours from deportment members. Mutual aid was both given (to Woyzato for a fire) and received (from Hamel for a house fire). Looking nbrnd to the third quarter should give (he members a little break with some Monday evenings with no activity planned in order for firefighters to spend some time with family and friends during the Minnesota summer. The department is plonning to take the Studebaker, and possibly the new utiUty truck (U-11), to three parades in July; Delano's Fourth of July Parade, Hamel's Rodeo Parade and the Watertown Fire Muster Parade. Tlicse are good opportunities for the members to enjoy some comeraderie, show off our equipment and build rclaationships with sunotmding conmmnities and their fire departmen'.s. TO:Mayor Jabbour and Orono City Council Members FROM:Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:August 4. 1999 COUNCIL MEETING AUQ 0 9 1999 Cl I Y UH OmU/VO SUBJECT: Orono Golf Course to have a Unit in the Corn Days Parade Ron Steffenhagen, the Golf Course Superintendent, has arranged to have a unit in the Com Days Parade to commemorate the Orono Golf Coiirse 75 th anniversary. The unit will be a golf cart with signs indicating the 75th anniversary of the Orono Golf Course. >1 "r; 'V-, ■4“ Cni iMniL meeting July 29.1999 AUG 0 9 1999 Cl IY Ut- UttUNU Ron Moorse City Administrator City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 i»» • Dear Mr. Moorse; Enclosed is our proposal to the City of Orono for year 2000 funding for Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners in the amount of $2000. We have detailed for you the progress made in 1998 and the first half of 1999 through the efforts of lOCP. Goods and services provided to Orono residents have been quantified along with the corresponding budgetary implications. Please note that lOCP spent $7,539 on goods and services assisting residents of Orono in 1998. We continue to work with families and individuals to address multiple barriers as they strive to achieve self- sufficiency. Our holistic approach to assistance is based on the understanding that all issues and barriers must be addressed simultaneously to enable families to achieve stability and financial independence. While Orono residents make up a small percentage of lOCP clients, please note that both the quantity of services sought and the lOCP financial commitment for Orono residents tripled in 1998, over 1997. We are asking each of the cities in our service area to consider providing support for lOCP services for its residents. We have been fortunate to receive past and current financial support from the Cities of Plymouth and Medina, utilized by lOCP to provide goods and services for their citizens. Our commitment and assistance lo the citizens of Orono continues to grow. We hope that the City of Orono will consider joining in support of the efforts of lOCP. I would be happy to meet with you and/or members of the Orono City Council to discuss ways in which lOCP can be of even greater assistance to you in your efforts to maintain a high quality of life for all Orono citizens. Thank you for giving our proposal your kind consideration. Sincerely, LaDonna Hoy, Executive Director INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS 110 Grand Avenue South, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391-1872 612/473-2436 Fax 612/473-4337 i To: From: City of Orono Interfaith Outreach & Community Partners 110 Grand Ave. S. Wayzata,MN 55391 Contact Person: LaDonna Hoy, Executive Director 473-2436 Re:Request for Funding for the Year 2000 Interfaith Outreach & Community Partners (lOCP) requests a grant of $5,000 from the City of Orono to help subsidize its services for Orono residents in the year 2000. lOCP’s service continuum available for Orono residents includes but is not limited to: Emergency Services - information, referral, advocacy, food, clothing, shelter, financial assistance with housing, transportation, medical and other life needs. Family Services Program - intensive and extended advocacy, support and subsidy for families pursuing employment upgrade and other long term goals. Welfare to Work Services - customized case management support and services for MFIP-S clients in pursuit of transition goals. Job Services - onsite and offsite job services for unemployed and underemployed families and individuals. Homebuyer Assistance - information, counsel, referral, advocacy, and financial assistance with homebuyer opportunities. Transportation - rides to critical services, such as medical, educational, employment, counseling, court, legal, etc. Independence Day - a program which makes used cars available for residents \^o need a car to find and keep a job. financial assistance with car maintenance and repairs. Holiday Help - help with holidays and notal events - Piaster, Thanksgiving and Christmas, birthdays, new baby layette fumiture/equipment. Children’s Programs - help with back-to-school needs, camp scholarships, linkages with recreational and enrichment opportunities, Cargill/IOCP bookshelf. 1 Medical - financial assistance for prescriptions/glasses and other medical needs; assistance with application for Minnesota Care/Medicare/Medicaid; referrals to the Caring Clinic. Professional Services - pro bono tax preparation, legal assistance, budget counseling, and dental care, as well as low-cost mental health counseling. lOCP SERVICES TO ORONOLONG LAKE RESIDENTS From January 1 through June 30.1999, residents of Orono have made 24 visits to lOCP and have received services totaling S2,995.47. Funds and services allocated to Orono households from January 1. to December 31 of 1998* were applied as follow;,: Service Food Number of Assists Dollars Applied Transportation Housing Utilities Medical Other 5 11 7 3 3 S 453.70 $ 4,635.88 $ 1,382.80 $ 417.00 $ 650.00 TOTAL $ 7^93S * These figures do not include the value of in-kind goods and services, (i.e., food/clothing/rides/information/referral/advocacy) and costs associated with special programs funded outside of our general operating budget (i.e. the Housing Endowment Fund, the Independence Day Car Fund, the BeFriender Project etc.) lOCP COLLABORATION lOCP networks with a broad variety of social service providers, school districts, churc hes, child care, health and mental health providers, employment service providers, coun*’', city and public safety professionals, recreation resources, community service provioers and civic groups, foundations, businesses, and corporations in the development and delivery of services to Orono residents. r I The Vision for the Viliage Initiative, launched at lOCP’s 1997 Annual Meeting, set in motion a communitywide action plan to remove the key barriers to self sufficiency-lack of affordable housing, lack of affordable child care, transportation barriers, job skills that lag behind a changing job market, and lack of connection with the resources and opportunities of our community. Community leaders were convened around a proposed structure for implementing this initiative. Housing, Child Care, Employment, Transportation, and Valuing Families and Children Task Forces were formed Community leaders and volunteers from all sectors signed on - some as task force participants, others as bridge builders, still others as recruiters of people, funds, in-kind gi^ and services, champions in the community, etc. Early and continued heartening results of these efforts include but are not limited to: Development and staffing of the Community Housing Coalition. Expansion of the lOCP Housing Endowment Fund (a renewable resource to fund, and leverage frmding for, long term affordable housing solutions) to $500,000+ and development of a 2-year plan for use of the fund. Development of the Kid ’s Kare Konnection, a nonprofit Child Care Center at Messiah United Methodist Church in Plymouth, which will open in January/2000 and which will provide 60 new affordable child care slots. A west suburban legislative advocacy campaign for full funding of the Basic Sliding Fee Child Care Program; an August, 1999 campaign for donations to Kids ’ Kare Konnection from August tax rebates. Enhancement of the Independence Day Project ~ recruitment of 3 car dealer partners who sell good used cars to lOCP at discounted rates, discounted car repair by participating repair shops, and development of the Independence Day Car Fund (used to buy used cars from participating dealers.) Upgrade of our services to MFIP-S clients through creative lOCP staffing and collaboration with the West Hennepin Employment Partnership. Expansion of our partnership with Employment Action Center -16 hr/wk Job specialist now on site at lOCP. The October 1998 launch of the Caring Clinic, a primary health care pilot providing free care for the uninsured at two of HealthSystem Minnesota ’s subuii}an clinics — Wayzata Internal Medicine and Creekside in St. Louis Park. Expansion of CONECT to the Shenandoah Apartment Homes, Willow Woods townhomes, and Kimberly Meadov's. Expansion of the lOCP/Interchurch BeFriender Project which provides lay pastoral care for persons in difficult life transitions. I ■ ■ : lOCP partners with Community Action for Suburban Hennepin County (CASH), Hennepin County, the Employment Action Center, our west suburban counterparts: STEP, WeCan, and Hopkins Resource Center, and Family to Family Ties, on WHEP (West Hennepin Employment Partnership). This initiative, one of seven regional Welfare to Work initiatives funded by McKnight Foundation, provides funding for transportation and mentors for our MFIP-S clients. lOCP is represented on the CASH Board, the Communities in Collaboration Council, the Board of the Foundation HealthSystem Minnesota, District #284 Lifelong Education for Adults and Families committee, the Orono Healthy Families, Healthy Youth Collaborative, the Kids’Kare Kcnnection Board, the Local Collaborative Time Study Advisory Board, and the Hennepin County Homelessness Task Force. lOCP is also a member of the Wayzata, Plymouth and Minnetonka Rotary and the Wayzata and Twin West Chambers of Commerce. In 1998, lOCP became a United Way-fiuided agency. lOCP serves as partner and fiscal manager of the CONECT Project. Vision 2000, lOCP’s 1999-2001 Strategic Plan also focuses lOCP on the internal operations and infrastructure needed to sustain and grow these efforts - namely fundraising, administration and staffing, communications, information systems development, space, volunteerism, and heightened collaboration. Standing Board Committees ~ Development, Operations, Public Relations, Finance, Strategic Plarming ~ attend to these issues. We have upgraded our fund development staffing and our information systems software and hardware and have begun to develop the tools and systems needed for tracking and measuring outcomes. Space has become a key issue at lOCP. We have outgrown our current space and are researching space options. Two examples of the creative expansion of recent fund development include: • Spread Your Hlngs, lOCP’s April 17,1999, fundraiser celebration of its 20th anniversary was not only an extremely successful first-time fundraiser (net - $84,515) and community builder but an exquisite witness of the heart and resolve of our community to do whatever it takes to remove the internal and external barriers that keep our families and children from their dreams. • lOCP became a United Way-funded agency in 1998. United Way funding is prescripted for building capacity for service accessibility and delivery in lOCP’s outer service area - Long Lake, Orono, Hamel, Medina, Corcoran. The lOCP Development Committee is responsible for fundraising from all of the constituencies that support lOCP. In 1998,35% of lOCP funding came from individuals, 14% from area churches, 21% from Foundations, 8% from Corporations, 5% from local small businesses, 7% from various units of government, 4% from other organizations, 3% from United Way and Community Solutions Fund, and 3% from interest. As these initiatives build momentum they place heightened demand on the time, energy, and resources. We exceeded our 1998 general operating revenue goal ($725,000). However, our 4/1/99-3/31/00 revenue goal ($825,000) represents a 12.1% increase. Support for special projects funded outside of our general operating budget such as CONECT (serving exclusively Plymouth residents), the Housing Endowment Fund, the Community Housing Coalition, the Independence Day Project, and the BeFriender Project present an added funding challenge. VOLUNl £ERISM AT lOCP lOCP continues to engage the wisdom, time, energy and expertise of more than 600 community volunteers (who in 1998 contributed 28.000 hours of volunteer service) and an ever-growing list of partners. It is because of this extraordinary community support and collaboration that we and our partners are able to deliver an amazing level of service to our community and keep administrative costs at 18.3%. ATTACHMENTS lOCP Board of Directors lOCP Brochure lOCP 1999 Budget (2000 Budget not yet available) 501 (cX3) letter of determination Please note: lOCP Audit is available upon request INTERFAITH OUTREACH & COMMUNITY PARTNERS BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1999 - 2000 Chair Greg Rye Owner, Arnold & Rye, INK (475-2363) Vice Chair Bill Dittmore Associate Director of Community Affairs and Volunteerism for General Mills (473-0959) Secretary Belle Davenport Realtor, Edina Realty (476-4390) Treasurer Dane Swenson President, Alpine Capital (249-9079) Mary Bildsoe Realtor, Re-Max (591-6054) Margaret Blazek Community Volunteer (472-3278) Steve Bohl Owner, Bohland Development/Pillar Homes (473-6851) Mary Kay Burfeind Small Business Owner (473-6162) Pat Gharrity Sales Manager, Endurant Business Solutions (473-5843) Bonnie Johnson Community Volunteer (473-8004) Patricia MacDonald Free Lance Writer, Lakeshore Weekly N^ws (475-2693) Joe McCarthy President, Northstar Counselors, IncJ Pinnacle Worldwide (473-1690) Gary Obermiller President, Deltak, EEC (557-7445) Bob Pajor Retired Corporate Executive (473-6157) Christopher Pierson Attorney, Pierson & Pierson (473-1400) Colleen Simpson Director, Community Services and Operations, The Foundation HealthSystem Minnesota (993-5021) Ex Officio: The Rev. Mr. Joseph Wierschem Deacon, Retired Corporate Executive (475-9139) l‘ 1 if lOCP 4/1/1999 • 3/31/2000 General Operating Budget Desifi nated Funds Grand Expense Direct Sorv Ind Day Volunteer Family Serv Holiday Gen Admin Total Main United Way CONECT BeFriender Housing I Berg Hsg Indep.Day Des.Total Tout Budget UtiliUes 21,000.00 4,000.00 26,000.00 0.00 26.000.00 Housing 140.000.00 24,000.00 164,000.00 82,766.00 82,766.00 246.788.00 Transport 55,000.00 10,000.00 20.000.00 85,000.00 30.000.00 30,000.00 116,000.00 Medical 10.000.00 2.000.00 12,000.00 0.00 12,000.00 Child Care 9,250.00 7,750.00 17,000.00 0.00 17.000.00 Education 1,000.00 3,750 00 4.750.00 aoo 4.760.00 Food 10.500.00 6.500.00 17,000.00 0.00 17.000.00 Foodshelf 10,500 00 11,000 00 21,500.00 0.00 21.600.00 Job Service 10,000.00 10,000.00 2,605.32 2.608.32 12,606.32 MIsc 800.00 800.00 1.453.00 3,384.00 4,837.00 8,637.00 Other Liv Exp 12,450.00 5.450.00 17,900.00 0.00 17,900.00 BTS Stvpiies 2.000.00 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 Baby Layette 800.00 800.00 0.00 100.00 Rerreshments 4.000.00 1,000.00 5,000.00 4,530.00 350.00 4,880.00 9,880.00 Mater/SuppRes 9,000.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 5.500.00 18,500.00 500.00 2.200.00 1,220.00 800.00 4,720.00 23,220.00 Event Supp & CC 0.00 3,250.00 3,260.00 3J60.00 Training 1.500.00 1,200.00 2,700.00 175.00 400.00 3.610.00 4,186.00 8,886.00 Postage 2,400.00 750.00 6,850.00 10,000.00 750.00 450.00 250.00 500.00 1,050.00 11,060.00 PuMcRel 3,500.00 14,000.00 17,500.00 500.00 250.00 760.00 10,260.00 Mleage 350.00 753.82 107.00 1,210.82 2.283.00 2,500.00 200.00 300.00 6,283.00 6,493.82 Van 800.00 800.00 1,518.00 1,618.00 2.318.00 insVan/Volun 1,300.00 200.00 1,500.00 1.244.00 1,244.00 2,744.00 Salaries 113.967.00 5,087.00 29,347.00 22,587.00 6,256.00 67,219.00 246,463.00 20.598.00 74,059.00 20.800.00 33.072.00 148,629.00 394,992.00 SSMerficara 8,718.48 389.16 2,245.05 1,727.91 631.58 5,142.25 18,854.42 1,575.74 5,665.51 1.591.20 2,530.00 11.382.46 30,216.87 SEP 1,139.67 50.07 293.47 225.87 82.56 672.19 2.464.63 205.98 620.00 208.00 330.72 1.364.70 3,829.33 UlflitJes Bldg 8,524.91 8,624.91 600.00 600.00 9,124.91 Telephone 12,000.00 12,000.00 750.00 2,500.00 800.00 4,050.00 18.060.00 InsBidg 1,100.66 1,100.66 150.00 160.00 1.260.86 Bldg Maim & Equip 6,000.00 6,000.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 8.400.00 Computer Software 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 2.000.00 BraaMast 7,250.00 7,250.00 0.00 7.260.00 Audit 6,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 6.000.00 FR Events 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 6.000.00 Misc - Office 4,500.00 4,500.00 0.00 4,600.00 SPWEvem 21,905.00 21,905.00 0.00 21,906.00 Worirers'Comp 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 UnemComp 4,500.00 4,500.00 0.00 4,600.00 Empllns •17,476.56 17,476.56 7,000.00 2.467.00 9,467.00 26.943.66 Rent-CONECT 0.00 5.640.00 6,640.00 6,840.00 Capitai 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 10.000.00 Total 423.675.15 15.527.03 39,339.34 97.990.78 24,520.14 208,947.57 810,000.00 29,443.04 115,226.51 30,732.20 39,999.72 86,150.00 30,000.00 331,561.47 1,141,661.47 p:Madonna\budgt992.xls 5/12/1999 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR P 0 BOX A-3290 DPN 22-2 CHICAGO* IL 60690 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Date:MAY 0 11991 INTERrAITH OUTREACH AND COMHUNITV PARTNERS 630 E HAYZATA BLVD HAYZATA* MN 55391 Employer Identification Number: 36-3'l82724 Contact Person: MS. A. MCKINLEY Contact Telephone Number: (312) 086-0301 Our Letter Dated: July 30 1907 Addendem Applies: t NO Dear AppI leant: This modifies our letter of the above date In iihich iie stated that you Mould be treated as an organIratIon Mhich Is not a private foundation until the expiration of your advance ruling period. Your exempt status under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code as an organization described In section 501(c)(3) Is still In effect. Based on the Information you submitted! Jie have determined that you are not a private foundation Mithin the meaning of section 509(a) of the code because you are an organization of the type described In section 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vl). Grantors and contributors may rely on this determination unless the Internal Revenue Service publishes notice to the contrary. Hoiiever* If you lose your section 509(a)(1) status* a grantor or contributor may not rely on this determlnation If he or she nas in part responsible for* or Mas anare ofi the act or failure to act* or the substantial or material change on the part of the organization that resulted in your loss of such status* or If he or she acquired knoHledge that the Internal Revenue Service had given notice that Mould no longer be classified as a section 609(a)(1) organization. If Me have Indicated In the heading of this letter that an addendum applies* the addendum enclosed is an Integral part of this letter. Because this letter could help resolve any questions about your private foundation status* please keep it In your perman.int records. If you have any questions* please contact the person Hhose name and telephone number are shoMn above. Sincerely yours* Jk, B. Wintrode* Jr. * District Director Letter 1050(D0/CG) lOCP SERVICES ^ Emergency Services: • Information, referral, advocacy • Food and clothing help • Financial assistance with shelter, housing, transportation, utilities and medical needs V Family Services: • Support and subsidy for families working on self-sufficiency goals Help with welfare-to-work transition ^ Job Services: • Assistance with job search, resume writing, training resources ^ Transportation: • Rides to educational classes, medical and other appointments • Monday - Friday appointments • 48 hour advance notice required ^ CONECT Project: • Community collaborative developed to create nurturing neighborhoods within multi-unit apartment complexes • Link low-income families and children who live in these complexes with resources of the community ^ St Mary's Health Clinic: • Free primary care for the uninsured located at the Wayzata Medical Building • Call 690-7029 for appointments ^ Special Programs: • Back-to-Schooll, Holiday, Birthday and Welcome Home, Baby! • Tax preparation for low-income households Foodshelf and "'Clothes to You" Hours: Monday 4 p.m. - 6 p.m. Wednesday 9 a.m. - Nixm 4 p.m. - 6 p.m. Friday 9 a.m. - Noon Clothing Donations Welcomed: Tuesday & Thursday: 10 a.m. - 4 p.m. First Saturday of month: 9 a.m. - Noon COMMUNITIES SERVED • Plymouth’^ • Long Lake • Hamel • Medina • Wayzata • Medicine Lake*^ • Minnetonka Beach • Orono ^Portions of these municipalities 1997 ASSISTS lOCP served 723 unduplicated households dur ing 1997. The type and number of assists to those familes were as follows: Clothing............................4,960 Food ....................................7,152 * Housing................................529 Utilities............................. 189 Medical ..................................96 Job Services.............................99 Transportation/Auto Maintenance and Repairs... 906 Rides Given .......................2,107 St. Mary's Clinic Visits.......235 *252,365 pounds of food were distributed. INTERFAITH VOLUNTEERS - provide the beat to lOCP's services from the heart. f*qp^heir generous and faithful I service keeps us responsive JLm to community needs year 'round and allows us to direct a significant portion of every dollar contributed toward helping people- 1997 Volunteer Hours... Over 28,IIU lOCP is a place where broken drmmWdhrokm i ■ ■ hearts are mended. It is a safe fidven full of love and -r'- hope and respect. :1 4 -V : Renee Levin, Voluntwr I. -r * ■' 'if.'- • ; .,:v 1997 CONTRIBUTIONS & SERVICES Where Ihe Money Comes From Interest Organizelions and Schools \ Butines V o|^ Qovamment Where the Money Goes Client Related Services* L |m;-.uU ' ij L cn. M j .]«><” (J Tr.r*>pcMclt id Care Food eic iPcMdfian J eic M *In addition, lOCP ended 1997 with an increase of fund balances in the Berg Housing Fund, General Fund, Food Fund and Program Fund totaling $301,256. 1997 IN-KIND GIFTS lOCP was also the grateful recipient of in-kind donations of food, clothing, household items and rides to medical and education appointments valued at over $368,000!! Thank you for your support! Ihe mission of Interfaith Outreach & Community Partners is to identify and respond to the unmet basic human needs of people who live in our community by serving them in times of crisis and assisting them in moving toward self-sufficiency through the creative action of an inclusive partnership of communities of faith, schools, government, businesses, community groups, foundations and individuals. 110 Grand Avenue South Wayzata, MN 55391-1872 473-2436 Fax: 473-4337 Office Hours Monday - Friday 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. C>ii£tieMk4^ 'J^ecfpU lAnlimg to HeipJ^oopLo Communities In Collaboration Council "Families First" Uniting Communities of Business Education Health Faith Families Government Neighborhoods Social Services located in: Corcoran Maple Grove Medicine Lake Medina Minnetonka Orono P*vmout!i Wayzata COUNCIL MEETING ♦ • 4 AU6 0 9 1999 CU Y Ul* UHUNCJ Mr. Ronald Moorse City Administrator City of Orono 2750 Kelly Parkway Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Moorse: Enclosed is the Communities in Collaboration Council’s request to the Orono City Council for funding of $200.00 for the year 2000. The CICC is dedicated to building healthy communities and healthy youth through asset development. This is a true collaborative effort among the schools, families, government, businesses, faith communities, social service organizations and community groups within our service area. We are grateful for your consideration of our request for support. Please contact me if you have questions or would like additional information. Sincerely, Carol Bergenstai Coordinator, Communities in Collaboration Council Wayzala Medical Building • 250 North Central Avenue • Suite LL1 • Wayzata, MN 55391 Phone: 612.993.8224 • Fax: 612.993.8313 • E-mail: bergerm@hsmnet.com COMMUNITES IN COLLABORATION COUNCIL Overview: The Communities in Collaboration Council (CICC) was established in 1993 to help build a healthy, nurturing community for the children and youth who live in the eight municipalities within the geographic boundaries of the Wayzata School District, including the City of Orono. Our mission is to promote collaborative planning and development among all aspects of the community in order to build assets for our families and youth. The CICC’s mission to promote the development of assets in families and youth is based upon the 40 developmental assets established by the Search Institute of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Search Institute’s research has demonstrated a strong correlation between the presence of assets in youth (i.e., a family life that provides high levels of love and support, schools that provide a caring encouraging environment, young people who are given useful roles in the community) and the decrease in high-risk behaviors (i.e., use of alcohol or drugs, early se.xual activity, possession or use of a weapon). Pkase refer to addendum #1 for a list of the speciHc goals of the CICC for 1999- 2000. The CICC brings together key community players (the schools, government, community organizations, social service organizations, business and communities of faith) to focus on specific goals. By working collaboratively, the CICC eliminates duplicative efforts and combines resources to address the issues affecting families in our community. There is one part-time staff person who is responsible for coordinating the planning and projects of the CICC. All CICC initiatives (such as the Parenting with Vision series) are marketed widely to the families within the Wayzata School District, including Orono, Wayzata, Plymouth, Maple Grove, Medina, Corcoran, Minnetonka and Medicine Lake. All information is publicized in the Community Education brochure, .‘school (public and private) newsletters, church bulletins, local newspapers, cable TV, etc. In addition, the CICC publishes a monthly newsletter. Families First, that is distributed to 8,000 families within our service area, including Orono. Finally, this year the CICC has been awarded a $20,000 grant from the Local Collaborative Time Study monies. This grant will be used to host a “Train the Trainer” conference. Attendees (including repre5(<*ntati''es from Orono) will be educated about asset development and equipped with specitjc ideas and methods to increase assets among the youth with whom they work or relate. Each attendee will then be expected to conduct at least one asset building training session for the community or organization he/she represents. This will, in turn, further impact the broader Orono community. * Measuring Effectiveness: An assessment of the developmental assets present in the Wayzata School District student population (including students from Orono) is determined through Search Institute Surveys and the Minnesota Survey which are administered to students on a regular basis. These surveys identify an increase or decrease in the presence of assets in the youth of our conununity and an increase or decrease in high-risk behavior. In addition, the United Way is developing indicators (statistics on youth attempted suicides, crime rates, youth reporting feeling safe in the neighborhood, youth reporting they can talk to their mother or father about problems) which will be available to the CICC as assessment tools for our programming. Please refer to addendum #6 for a list of CICC initiatives. Budget: The CICC has been funded by a state grant that has been decreasing over the past two years and will come to end in 2000. The CICC has established a funding plan which is outlined below. It is calculated on a per citizen basis for municipalities, total student enrollment for District 284 and nominal rates for social service agencies and faith communities. It is representative of the current census of the municipalities within the defined service area. The basic funding from the local partners will sustain the CICC organization and administration. Additional funding from the county and corporate foundations will be pursued to support current and future collaboration efforts initiated by the CICC. The Wayzata School District is the fiscal agent for the CICC. See addendum # 2 for detaUs of ClCC^s income and expenses. CICC 1999-2000 REVENUE: SOURCE AMOUNT SECURED OR AISITICIPATED State Grant ISD #284* Cities within CICC service area*: Plymouth Wayzata Minnetonka Medina Medicine Lake Orono Maple Grove Corcoran Other supporting Members, organizations and grants: Previous year balance $10,000 $ 6,337 Secured Secured $5,421 $ 578 $ 826 $ 295 $ 200 S 200 $ 200 $ 200 Anticipated Anticipated Anticipated Anticipated Anticipated Anticipated Anticipated Anticipated $6,000 $1.086 Anticipated TOTAL $31^3** * School district and city contributions are based on the following formula calculated by population: Wayzata School District Population 48,753 X 13 cents = $6,337.00 Plymouth 36,143 X 15 cents = $5,421.00 Wayzata 3,858 X 15 cents = $ 578.00 Minnetonka 5,507 X 15 cents = $ 826.00 Corcoran 290 X 20 cents 200 00^ Maple Grove 901 X 20 cents = $ 200.00^ Orono 398 X 20 cents = $ 200.00» Medina 1,296 X 20 cents = $ 295.00 Medicine Lake 360 X 20 cents = $ 200.00» *A minimum of $200 is requested. ** Please note that this figure reflects the operational costs of the CICC. The CICC brings $200,000 in federal grant monies into the communities served by the CICC. This grant money cannot be used for CICC operational support. The grant money is distributed to numerous community, school and soci^ service organizations serving all of the citizens of the municipalities within the CICC service area, including Orono. In addition, separate funding is secured by the CICC through grants from community organizations and foundations for specific CICC initiatives including the Parenting Forum and the Families First newsletter. !: t h 1 Project Support: The CICC has received the following project support for 1999-2000: • $20,000 from the Local Collaborative Time Study Grant for a ‘Train the Trainer” conference that will educate participants in asset development and enable them, in turn, to train other community members. • $800 from Lutheran Brotherhood for the Parenting with Vision education series. • $2,200 from the Wayzata PTA/0 Liaison Council for the Parenting Forum. In addition, we are seeking a grant of $16,000 for publication of the Families First newsletter. In-Kind Support: The Wayzata School District serves as fiscal agent to the CICC. This service is valued at $5,000 per year. Office space for the CICC at the Wayzata Medical Building is provided free of charge by HealthSystem Minnesota valued at $2,006 per year. Telephone provided free of charge by HealthSystem Minnesota valued at $200 per year. Use of Volunteers: The CICC is an organization primarily composed of volunteers. All community representatives who sit on the Council are volunteers. (The part-time coordinator is the only paid staff.) All of the programs initiated by the CICC depend heavily upon volunteer support. For examples, over 75 volunteers help with the planning, coordination and set-up of the annual Parenting Forum. Without volunteers, CICC would not function. The donation of their time and expertise greatly expands the impact of the CICC and enhances our capabilities many times over. The Need in Orono: The need for the CICC to bring its collaborative approach to focus on the development of assets in the youth of our community is clearly demonstrated through the results of the most recent Minnesota Survey and Search Institute Survey of the Wayzata School District students. 398 of the residents of the Wayzata School Dutrict live in Orono. The 1998 Minnesota Survey indicates that 20% of 6* graders, 54% of 9* graders and 70% of 12 graders used alcohol in the past 12 months. 21% of 9^ graders and 33% of 12* graders used marijuana in the past 12 months. 8% of 9^ grade girls and 31 % of 12* grade girls, 19% of 9* grade boys and 31% of 12* grade boys have had sexual intercourse. These high-risk behaviors are evidence of the need for increased asset development among our youth. I lUi The citizens of Orono benefit from the CICC by: a. ) Becoming aware of the importance of developmental assets in the prevention of high- risk behavior among the youth in our community. b. ) Accessing funding (the Local Collaborative Time Study grant) brought into this community because of the existence of the CICC. c. ) Ultimately reducing the level of high-risk behavior among our youth and thus creating a community where children feel safe, valued and connected. The CICC is the coordinating force behind this community’s efforts to promote developmental assets among our youth. WTiile the schools, government, business, faith communities, community organizations and social service agencies have all developed an increased focus on asset development over the past several years, it is the CICC who can coordinate these efforts and provide an all-encompassing approach to the process. There is general agreement that all aspects of the community must work together in order to fundamentally improve the lives of families and children. All of us — teachers, government officials, counselors, business people, religious leaders, coaches, and parents — must be speaking the same language. A broadly focused effort on asset development requires community collaboration. No single organization or group (parents, schools, faith communities, etc.) can accomplish this alone. The CICC is the conduit to make that happen. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION: 1. CICC’s 1999 - 2000 Goals. See addendum #1 2. CICC Budget. See addendum #2 3. Results of the Minnesota Survey and the Search Institute Survey of ISD #284 students substantiating the need for asset development in our community, including Orono. See addendum #3 4. List of current CICC Council Members. See addendum #4 5. Job description and resume of key personnel. See addendum #5 6. Overview of CICC Initiatives. See addendum #6 7. 40 Developmental Assets as described by Search Institute. See addendum #7 8. Copy of CICC’s newsletter. Families First. See addendum #8 Signature ^/Date Coordinator of the Communities in Collaboration Council Title COMMUNITIES IN COLLABORATION COUNCIL 1999-2000 GOALS MISSION: Promote collaborative planning and development among all ^pects of the community to build assets* for our youth and families. * Assets are defined as the 40 developmental assets established by the Search Institute of Minneapoiis, activity, possession or use of a weapon). Goal ClCC will solicit applicants for Local Collaborative Time Study grants, review grant proposals and approve dissemination of remaining "rant money. Asset Focus All 40 assets ClCC will sponsor a Train the Trainer conference to: 1. ) Provide community members with information about asset development and 2. ) equip them with specific id^ and methods to increase the assets among the youth with whom they work or relate. All 40 assets Action A minimum of 5 community groups or organizations wnll submit grant proposals which focus on Learning & Family Support Systems. Physical & Mental Health Services, Violence Prevention/Community Safety or Asset Building in Youth. 1. ) ISO people representing all areas of the community (schools, faith communities, parents, businesses, government, etc.) will attend the conference. 2. ) Each attendee of the conference will, in turn, conduct at least one asset building training session for the community or organization that he/she represents._____ Outcome After one year, each grantee demonstrates specific outcomes that show progress towards their stated goal. There is a increased knowledge base for asset development within the community measured by the actual number of conference participants and by the number of community residents they, in turn, train in asset development. ClCC will cosponsor the Parenting Forum and the Parenting with Vision series that will address a wide variety of parenting issues. All 40 assets SOO parents from the Wayzata School District will attend the Saturday morning Parenting Forum and an average of 200 parents will attend each single*speaker lecture in the Parenting with Vision series. Parents are equipped with specific models to decrease high-risk behavior patterns and an increase the assets of the youth in the Wayzata School district ClCC wiU publish a ncwslctter/events calendar focused on community activities for families 8 times in 1999-2000 school year. ClCC will secure funding for $13,920 (from cities, other supporting members and grants) for general operating support and approx. $20,000 for special program support (newsletter, F--renting with Vision and Parenting Forum) Asset #7: Young people perceive that community adults value youth. Asset #8; Young people are given useful roles in the community. Asset #9; Young person serves in the community 1 hr or more per week. All 40 assets 8.000 families within the ClCC service area will receive the newsletter. Participation in fiunily- related community activities increases. ClCC will submit grant requests to each city and organization represented by ClCC for general operating support. ClCC will submit grant proposals to specific funders for program support. ClCC’s initiatives result in the decrease of high-risk behavior among the youth of the Wayzata School District as shown through the results of the Minnesota Survey and Search Institute Survey. Addendum #2 CICC BUDGET 98-99 99-00 EXPENSES: actual budget Contracted Services $2,500.00 $400.00 Postage $1,161.78 $643.00 General Supplies $1.823.73 $824.00 Advertisements $95.20 $100.00 Printing $2,218.62 $1,600.00 Duplication $1.311.20 $150.00 Food $876.10 $500.00 Tech Equip $279.97 Prof Dev/Fuel $890.44 $1,317.00 Subtotal $11,167.04 $5,634.00 Salary $21,335.01 $21,000.00 Benefits $2,737.23 $3,570.00 Subtotal $24,072.24 $24,570.00 TOTAL EXPENSES $35,229.28 $30,104.00 INCOME: Grant $20,000.00 $10,000.00 Cities $3,205.00 $7,920.00 ISD«284 Other Members. $3,168.00 $6,337.00 Misc. & Interest $3,903.00 $6,000.00 Prev. Year Balance $5,949.00 $1,086.00 TOTAL INCOME $36,315.00 $31,343.00 NOTE: Publication of Families First is funded through special project grants. Addendum #3 Results of 1998 Minnesota Survey of ISD #284 Students 1998 Participants 6“' Grade 9'" Grade '12^ Grade Boys 315 253 133 Girls 273 264 130 Heavy Cigarette Smoking In Past 30 Days (1/2 pack or more a day): Grade 6: .9% Grade 9: 6% Grade 12: 10% (down from 20% in 1995) Any Alcohol Use in the Past 12 Months: Grade 6: 15% Grade 9 47% (up from 39% in 1995) Grade 12 65% (down from 71% in 1995) Has 5 Or More Drinks on Typical Occasion: Grade 6: 1.4% Grade 9: 9% (up from 7% in 1995) Grade 12: 21% (down from 34% in 1995) Any Marijuana Use in Past 12 Months: Grade 6: 2.7% Grade 9: 21% (up from 20% in 1995) Grade 12; 33% (down from 39% in 1995) Any Drug Use (Other Than Marijuana) in Past 12 Months; Grade 9: Grade 12: 10% (down from 11% in 1995) 16% (down from 25% in 1995) E^er Had Sexual Intercourse; Grade 9 Girls: 8% (down from 12% in 1995) Grade 12 Girls: 31% (down from 42% in 1995) Grade 9 Boys: 19% (down from 25% in 1995) Grade 12 Boys; 31% (down from 49% in 1995) i 1994 Search Institute Survev of Wavzata Students Rgure G Percentages of Youth with At-risk Indicators: Comparisons by Grade* AT-RISK DOMAIN AT-RISK INDICATORS GRADE ALCOHOL TOBACCO Fr»qu«nt alcohol usa last 30 days) Bings dnnidng (1*. last 2 wssks ) Daily dgarstts uss Frequent chewing tobacco use (20*. lifetime) lliicrr ORUQS Frequent use of illldt drugs (6*. last year) Sexually active (2*)SEXUAUTY oi9ftess»Nf sucoe AMTI-SOCtAL BEHAVIOR SCHOOL Non-use of contraceptives Depression Attempted suidde Vandalism (2*. last year) Group fighting {2+. last year) Police trouble (2*. last year) Theft (2+. last year) Weapon use (2*. last year) School absenteeism (2* days, last month) Desire to drop out Your Youth Youth NsaonsUy Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nadon»Uy Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nationally Your Youth Youth Nationally 1 2 69 61 11 14 6 8 (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) 3 3 2 5 4 9 12 13 5 12 13 27 16 IS 3S 59 15 46 24 40 54 12 16 IS 36 12 17 8 9 11 16 6 6 IS 10 16 11 18 11 8 8 6 7 17 20 16 27 46 11 17 17 11 6 11 14 1 ■ . s.. sexually active youth who do not aiways use ccntraceotives Searcr. Institute. *392 (%) IS 22 30 39 22 18 8£ 27 14 43 60 33 47 12 15 12 IS 13 10 6 10 10 10 11 11 12 14 835 Addendum #4 Communities in Collaboration Council Members Thursday, July 22. 1999 Last Name First Name me Organization Name Ambrose Bob Member Wayzata City Council Arxjerson Karen Mayor City of Minnetonka Af)der8on Patricia Community Health Department BarghinI Chartana Coordinator Wayzata Community Education Beilfuss Paul Superintendent Wayzata Public Schools BrancN Jim Director Wayzata Community Education Dettloff John Community at Large Dreyman Wayne Reverend SL Phillip the Deacon Guenthner Ken Mayor Corcoran City Council Hoy LaOonna Executive Director lOCP Hubbard Brian Director RidgedaleYMCA Johnson Mick President The Foundation HSM Johnson Dwight City Manager City of Plymouth Johnson Judy Council Member Plymouth City Council Johnson Jamas Member Medina City Council KoUIck Unda Member Minnetonka City Council Korsmo Kris Coordinator CONECT Collaborative LaCanne Theresa Member City of Maple Grove UWe Mandy Member Orono City Council Paiks Karen Clerk Wayzata School Board Post Joan City of Minnetonka Saadman Ramona Community at Large Tiamay Joy Mayor City of Plymouth Tumar Ali Ubrartan Henn^)in Couny Ltt>rary-Plymo VannaU Carol Director Early CNIdhood Family Young Mary Anne Member Medicine Lake City Counca Page 1 of 1 'A Addendum §5 Job Description and Resume of ClCC Coordinator The CICC coordinator facilitates the collaboration of numerous community groups — education, business, faith communities, social service agencies and community members — for the purpose of building assets for families and children in accordance with the CICC by-laws. The coordinator: ■ provides leadership to the Collaboration Council, ■ motivates community members to work collaboratively, ■ designs and maintains an effective public relations program, ■ manages the budget, ■ writes grants, ■ facilitates and trains Council and community members in asset building. Carol Bergenstal was hired as Coordinator of the Communities in Collaboration Council in June 1999. She comes to the CICC from her most recent position as development director for the non-profit social service agency. Interfaith Outreach & Community Partners. Ms. Bergenstal has a long history of community involvement with the school and faith communities. She is a member of the Wayzata Rotary. Ms. Bergenstal has a BA in Political Science from the University of Florida. Addendum U6 COMMUNITIES IN COLLABORATION COUNCIL The mission of the CICC is to promote collaborative planning and development among all aspects of the community in order to build assets for our youth and families. The CICC’s mission to promote the development of assets in youth and families is based upon the 40 developmental assets established by the Search Institute of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Search Institute ’s research has demonstrated a strong correlation between the presence of assets in youth (i.e., a family life that provides high levels of love and support, schools that provide a caring encouraging environment, young people who are given useful roles in the community) and the decrease in high-risk behaviors (i.e., use of alcohol or drugs, early sexual activity, possession or use of a weapon). In 1998 - 1999 the CICC collaboratively accomplished the following: INITIATIVE CICC COLLABORATORS #’s TOUCHED IN CICC SERVICE AREA PareiKing with Vision (parenting series) Support received from the PTA/PTO Liaison Council, HealthSystem Minnesota, Lutheran Brotherhood, Community Education, Wayzata Public Schools Average attendance: 200 parents at each of five seminars ('onwiHuily Directory (directory of community resources) Information provided by numerous community organizations including Hennepin Library, Ridgedale YMCA, Plymouth Park and Recreation, Plymouth Westside Players, etc. 475 parents Parenting Those Wonderful df Crazy Kids (parenting forum) Workshops led by experts who volunteered their time from the Wayzata Public Schools, local counseling services. Park Nicollet Clinic, Groves Academy, etc. 475 parents CONICCT Collaborative Dinner CICC Council Members 70 families from multi-unit apartment buildings in Plymouth Pamily Life P' (community action group) Cross-section of community representatives led by Dr. William Doherty, Director of Marriage and Family Therapy at the U. of Minnesota 30 community representatives Intergenerational Dialogue (community response to the Columbine Tragedy) Cross-section of community representatives led by Dr. James V. Gambone, Points of View, Inc. 300 community residents from all 5 living generations Families First Newsletter (calendar of family-oriented events) Information provided by faith communities, schools, Plymouth Park and Rec, local dance and theater groups, Hennepin Library, local businesses, etc. Distribution: 8,000 per issue INITIATIVE CICC COLLABORATORS rs TOUCHED IN CICC SERVICE AREA OakwtHxi Elementary Action Team (focused on welcoming families to the community and mentoring children) Oakwood administration, faculty, PTA, CONHCT Collaborative, Interfaith Outreach & Community Partners, faith communities 350 families at Oakwood school Wayzata Partners (informal group of community representatives who meet monthly to share plans, ideas and concerns) Representatives from 15 community organizations (Wayzata Lions, Wayzata Public Schools, Pyramid Counseling, Minnetonka Center for the Arts, Hammer Residences, etc.) Entire community Future CICC Visions: Second Annual Parenting with Vision Series Fourth Annual Parenting Forum Train the Trainer Conference Expanded Families First Newsletter Community Initiatives from the Family Life P'Group and Intergenerational Dialogues CICC Membership Provides Access to: Local Collaborative Time Study grant opportunities Search Institute's National Initiative Alliance for Families and Children - County initiative Regional “We Love Our Kids!” Committee School Superintendent and Asset Builder Committee at HealthSystem Minnesota - ■4 40 Developmenta§ Assets ISSTIUM Addendum U1 “1 ASKTTYR ■gainm miT t. Fttaily support 1 Pocitivi fifflfly eoouBuakau'oA 3. OdMriduUrtUbooships 4. Carifl] e«shbort)eod 5. :«hco] di3u:i3 C. PatuH iavolvtatsot ia schcolinj Family lift providts high t«v«ls of )ev« aad wppon Partna and child eommunkaw poddvoly; child ia willing to lock pamnu advict and counaof Child recaivcs support from ihm or tnoro Boo*pamfl( idultt Child aipcfkncq eahnj aeighbcn Schod provide! a ca/ioj. cnccungjog cflviroomcni PsTMO SD actively iovolvod ia helping child suacod ia school tfOWBMCNT lOnAltQancmm 7. Ceaoutaity valua youth I. Youch givea ocaeAil roka 9. ComauftHy tcrvka 10. Safety Child perceives that community adults value youth Youth am given usehd roka in community life Child gives OTM hour or more pa week lo serving ia one's community Child feeb ufe in heme, school and neighborhood 11. Amily bouadoiee 11 School bouadarks 11 Keigbborhoed bouodaries 14. Aduh tele aodeb 13. Foaidim pea iaflueaeo 10. Kgb eapKtstioos Family has clear niks and consequences; snd moaiion wherubouts School provide s cka niks aad eonsequcoces NcighbM would report undcsinbk b^vkr to family PircMfs) aad etha adults owdel prosocial behavior Child's best friends model responsibk behavkr Both pereats and icnehcn press child to achievt lorauiurnmon m cutHfcmaQ BIMemn 17. 11 Youth pregms 19. Religious eocnmuaity 30i TlmeatbooM otganiiaiione as school andkr in comaraaity organiutions lavol^ one or more bouts pa week wkb Mends "with nothing special to do,* two or 21. & School cngagcacnc 34. Bondbig ID school 21 Rea&g for pknsurt ChQd is motivasad to do wcO in school ChOd is actively engaged ia kmiag Chflditpons enter mem hours of home wort pa day Quid carts about ho/his school Child reads fa pleasure three a more hours pa week 31 Coiat 27. BqnB^ 21 baifriiy 29. Uaneny sot RcaponibiBsy 3 Be Child plaecs Mpi vahm on belpiag otha paopla Child placns higli veliM on preme^ equality and reducing bMfW ttid po^vtjf Child action convicrions. stands up fa hg able beliefs responsibility Child believes it is impertam na to be seiaally active a to uac akahol a otha drugs 32. Planning and dndsioo»maidag 33. 34. Culoni coBBpetenen 39. Reeie tanea skflli 31 NneeAd conflkt reeohnion Child ha skill to plea ahead and make cfaoica Child ha empathy, sensitivity, and fricadshtp skills Child ha knowledge of and comfort with peepk of Child saeks lo resolve conOkt aon*violeatly 37. 31 Self 39. SenaefpyraoM 41 Child feels ih^ ha control ova '^hiap dtai happen to Child reports high eelf^ieem famioiie. 700 South 3rd Stiocv Minneapolis. Mh 95419.413-3764995 Community Action Community Strviccs Emergency Assistance Homeless Family Support Transitional Housing Volunteef Services Energy Assistance Tenant Hotfine Center for Homeownership Home Buyer Education Homeowner Counseling Home Rehab Counseing Welfare-to-Wbrfc 33-l0th Avenue S. Suite 150 Hopkins. MN 55343 Business (612)933-9639 Tenant Hotline 933-0017 Energy Assist. 930-3541 Fax 933-8016 TOO 935-4011 Investing In People, Building Community for Suburban Hennepin V* T > *• : II July 6,1999 Co* meeting AUG 0 9 I999 Dear Friends,Uinr ur unojvy Community Action for Suburban Hennepin is pleased to announce the successful spin-off of its HOME Line tenant services to independent status. Effective July 1, after six years as a program of CASH, HOME Line began operation as a separately incorporated nonprofit at its own location. HOME Line’s new address is 7462 Oxford St. St. Louis Park, MN 55426 The tenant hotline (and general office telephone number for HOME Line) remains 612-933-0017. HOME Line will operate the tenant hotline on behalf of CASH, continue the popular high school education program, perform policy-related research activities and will focus its tenant organizing efforts both in suburban Hennepin county and in state-wide efforts concerning critical rental housing issues. HOME Line will also provide policy advocacy on issues affecting tenants, focusing on the preservation of federally assisted housing. The establishment of an independent HOME Line has been made possible by the commitment of significant funding for up to two years from CASH and the Family Housing Fund. CASH and HOME Line anticipate a cooperative and mutually beneficial working partnership. Very truly yours, Sharon A. Jo(jfnson Executive Director CASH Charlie Warner Executive Director HOME Line P.S. Enclosed is a card with phone numbers and e-mail addresses for each HOME Line staff member. •OUM.I