The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-28-1999 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 28,1999,6:30 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items arc considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL 1.6:30 P.M. - Presentation Regarding Potential Westonka Area Community Center 2.6:50 P.M. - Award Sale of General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Scries 1999 - Resolution 3.7:00 P.M. - Public Hearing - Webber Hills Sewer Project A,Order Plans and Specifications for Webber Hills Sanitary Sewer Project • Resolution CONSENT AGENDA 4.Approve/Amend APPROVAL OF MINUTES *5. Regular Council Meeting of June 14, 1999 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sherokee Use, Representati \ e LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - Lili McMillan, Repre.sentative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sandy Smith, Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT #2372 Barry & Janiece llaglund, 4590 North Arm Drive West - Final Plat Approval - Resolution 7.#2439 Service 800, 2190 Way/ata Boulevard - Request for Access Revision 8.#2474 Susan Wilson, 325 Brown Road Soutli/2510 Abingdon Way, Lot Line Reairangemcnt - Resolution 9.#2477 George W. Stickney, 250/340 Old Crystal Bay Road South - Preliminary Plat Approval - Resolution 10.#2497 Gail S. Briner, 1760 Shadvwood Road - variance - Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 11.Mooney Lake Outlet 12.Spring Hill Golf Course Trail Agreement 13.No Parking County Road 19 Narrows Bridge - Resolution 14.Purchase of Water from Spring Park for Navarre Water Plant Rehabilitation 14a. Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Change Order #1 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 15.Bell South Antenna Approval 16.Resignation of Bruce Vang, Building Inspector ---- AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 28,1999,6:30 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT ♦ 17. LICENSES * 18. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 1999 06/28 - Council Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 07/05 - HOLIDAY - July 4 Observance 07/06 - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 07/07 - Highway 12 Design Review Committee Meeting, 5:30 p.m. 07/12 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 07/19 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 07/26 - Council Meeting. 7:00 p.m. 08/02 - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 08/04 - Highway 12 Design Review Committee Meeting, 5:30 p.m, 08/09 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 08/16 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 08/23 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. Public A ttendance Meeting Date □□ C ouncil Planning C ommission Park C ommission Other msmmsmmsms ||R|2p^;;:BEI^W •jFOR^^ NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER k \ .% 3. l-^iLU RrsiDZAfp . 'X ? S ’ /^/C2 S i) <-4iO ^ 'I ^ c i^ ^ / J lc(i r<7 / (j AJ.')/L„.Si. ■7- ^ S' s- — TTTt-M \o‘^a l/t-'^a,/. Lv H /1 h aM. U j:4 '< ir {B ^ ^ti2Ai,AYfr-U ^o-7S 1 c *} V i^{ <v /»/it ^ !fh!Ii /• ,*>{i } K HB [2cx< Public A ttendance Meeting Date (/’- S- 7^1 □□□□ Council Planning Commission Park Commission O ther teiraUESto CITY RECORDS.' NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 1 \)iTj.' Ji/. fd^luJ’U /^ih ■ L^\ hP r /( _ hr: A L 7i 7?^ ■-"a.^tA.' L t k; r>ej v'ft /'r/Ay^U • ------fT'/S ^ Ia Cl c £() 7. ysi__ Q la r r- r . r Jfi/r//LS. ,y!g.|7>^K ^ */i r T 6 ^ ^ Pj ( f -- —f f ‘ ^ f o / 0.■ -2/^- q py /:___________— J 1A y-y _______________________ _________li« ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JL-6.____________________ 11 1**.--------------------------------—------------------------------------------— 15. ______________________________—------------------------------—----------------------------------- miHA COUNCIL MEETING JUN 2 8 1999 CVl Y ut- UMO/MO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 25, 1999 ITEM NO: / Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Admia'strator’s Report Item Description: Citizens' Group Presentation Regarding Potential Westonka Community Center Members of a citizens' group in support of a community center to serve the Westonka area have requested an opportunity to make a presentation to the City Council. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: No action required. Lake Minnetonka Rec Center Togedier we can make it happen!ij I Grand Opening Goal September 2001 J li/.v IpM- The History Community members identified a lack of adequate gymnasium space for youth Additional discussions revealed larger needs of the broader communities Small group was formed to explore depth of interest in a NEW facility Site visits to Chanhassen, Lindbergh, Glencoe, and Chaska community centers Ovenwhelming community attendance at public meeting confirms need to move forward 6/25/99 L_____ Large community group evaluates needs and wants, which included; □ Four gymnasiums □ Senior Citizen / Youth Center □ Fitness Center □ Walking / running track □ Swim Area / Water Park □ Concession Area □ Theatre □ ice Arena □ Wrestling room □ Racquetball Court □ Meeting rooms Formed Three Subcommittees - Design / Construction - Finance - Communications Meetings - Bi-monthly large group meetings - next scheduled - June 17 - Sub-committees as scheduled Scheduled Presentations: - June 1 City of Mound - June 7 ISD # 277 School Board - June 14 City of Minnetrista - June City of Orono - Others to be determined 1* •^1 ■ Created Project Time Line 6/25/99 ■ . ' I,' t > ’ '.iA Design & Construction ■ Evaluated and refined needs / wants list TABULATION OF AREAS AREA USAGE APPROXIMATE SQUARE FOOTAGE 2-1,600 SQ FT. MEETING ROOMS 3,200 2-400 SQ. FT. MEETING ROOMS 800 KITCHEN 900 LOADING 900 SENIORA'OUTH CENTER 4,000 2-400 SQ FT OFFICES 800 DAYCARE CENTER 3,000 SWIMMING AREA 13,000 FITNESS CENTER 5,400 WRESTLING 4,000 HANDBALL 800 LOCKER AREA 5,000 ARCADE, CONCESSIONS. FOYER. ENTRY 4,500 CIRCULATION/HALLWAYS @ 20% of above 9,300 2-8.000 SQ. FT. GYMNASIUMS 16,000 2-6,000 SQ FT. GYMNASIUMS 12,000 ICE ARENA 40,000 THEATER 24,000 TOTAL APPROXIMATE AREA 147,600 147,600 Approx. Sq. Ft. x $110.00 per Sq. Ft. = $ 16.2 Mil 6/25/99 ^ 1\ The Conceptual Floor Plan 6/2S/99 THfAfER 24.000 50 n ICC ARENA 40,000 so FT. MTG 400 C tc . 400 SO n meet.nc 1.600 SO FI. meeting 1,600 SO n LOAONC 900 so FT KITCHEN 900 so n scniors /youth center 4.000 so r WICE 400 SO FT OfFiCC 400 S#.MMiNG AREA T 3.000 SO FI locker area MANO 5.000 8AU so FT 800 iso FI ARCAOC CONCESSIONS FOYER ENTRY 4.S00 SO n fitness center 5.400 so rr r RESTUN'3 4.000 so FI. STOP I • t I ' ^ \ \ STOP DAYCARE CENTER 3.0:*' so n j''" . ___% ' 1 ^ ^ * 0Y f 1 • GYMNASIUM ; 8.0GO • so FI. .1 . \ ' \ V» * \ X 1 C>^NAStUM 1 6.000 1 SO FT. ; ( 1 1• 1 1 1 1 f 5 /—BLEACHERS 1» 1» 1ft 1 1 1 ' GYMNASIUM GYMNASIUM' ' 8.000 8.000 1 i so ri.SO FI. ; , ! • j /— RUNNING / t m § / track W 9/ / ; / ABOVE » •• •• ✓ “ V PROPOSED AREA layout §2 i 9 I !l o Q “ 5 u 2 9u<< ^2 8SS Finance Possible Options: - HUD - Bonds / Capital Improvements - Cities - Bonds / Capital Improvements • Evaluations by Home Value - Westonka School District - Bonds / Lease Agreement • Evaluations by Home Value - Non-Profit / For-Profit combinations 6/25/99 Joint ownership Business Partners Grant Programs Corporate Sponsorships Donations - Individuals / Civic Groups Any other suggested sources? mm,i >’. 'f'Communications Getting The Word Out - Area residents - City Days Parade - Buttons - Newspapers - Flyers/Posters - Yard Signs - Various City Governments - School District Officials - State Officials - Civic Organizations - Private Businesses h 6/25/99 ii 4 Some of the Next Steps ■ Continue to Build Support - From Area Residents - From Various Cities - From School District - From State Officials ■ Site Requirements Defined ■ Start Envisioning the Possibilities ■ Financial Feasibility Defined ■ Your Comments and Advice 6/25/99 m' -r-:i Lake Minnetonka Rec Center: i Together we can make it happenl mm. 6/25/99 nter: pen! COUNCIL MEETING JUN 2 8 W99 CITY OHUNO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 25.1999 ITEM NO; 2^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Award Sale of General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999 - Resolution At its May 24,1999 meeting, the City Council called for the sale of General Obligation Improvement Bonds to fund sanitary sewer projects for three neighborhoods, which include Shoreline/Heritage Lane, Orono Orchards and Edgewood Hills. Ehlers Associates, the City's bond consultant h^ coordinated a competitive bid process for the sale of the bonds. The results of the sale wll be presented to the Council by Carolyn Drude of Ehlers Associates. The Council will then consider the award of the sale of the bonds. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt a resolution awarding the sale of General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999 in the amount of $1,190,000. JUN. 25. 1999 8:39AM EHIERS USSOC.NO. 4700 D C • ' • W Member introduced the following written resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AWARDING SALE OF $1,190,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1999, FIXING THE FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS THEREOF, PROVIDING FOR THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY, AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, as follows; 1. The proposal of (the “Purchaser”) to purchase the $1,190,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999 of the City at a price of $ _______plus accrued interest is hereby found and determined to be the best proposal received pursuant to the Ternis of Proposal, and shall be and is hereby accepted, said offer being to purchase Bonds bearing interest according to year of maturity as follows: Maturity Interest Maturity ('February 1)Edis tFebruarv n 2001 %2009 2002 2010 2003 2011 2004 2012 2005 2013 2006 2014 2007 2015 2008 Interest Rate % 1998/ 2. To provide funds for the City’s 1999 Improvement Projects as described in paragraph 3 (the "Improvements"), the City hereby determ’mes that it is necessary and expedient to issue pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, its negotiable General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999 (the “Bonds ) in the aggregate principal amount of $1,190,000, dated July 1,1999. which Bonds shall bear interest at the rates above set forth, computed on the basis of a 360-day year of nvclve 30-day months, payable Fcbruar>' 1,2000 and semiannually thereafter on February I and August 1 in each year, and shall mature serially on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: •JUN. 25. 1 999 S:39AM EHLERS UiSOC.NO. 4700 . 4 Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Amount $60,000 60,000 65,000 65.000 70.000 70,000 75.000 75,000 Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Amount $80,000 85,000 90.000 95.000 95,000 100,000 105,000 All Bonds mauiring on or after February 1, 2009. are subject to redemption prior payment in whole or in part in such order as the City may determine and by lot within a maturity at the option of the City on February 1, 2008, and any date thereafter at ^ and accrued interest. In the event of redemption by lot of Bonds of like matunty, the Bond Recistrar shall assign to each Bond of such maturity then outstanding a distinctive number ^ for each $5,000 of the principal amount of such Bonds and shall select by lot in the rnamier it determines the order of numbers, at $5,000 for each number, for all outstanding BoncU of like mamrity. The order of selection of Bonds to be redeemed shall be the Bonds to which were assigned numbers so selected, but only so much of the principal amount of each Bond of a denomination of more than $5,000 shall be redeemed as shall equal $5,000 tor each number assigned to it and so selected. The Bonds shall be numbered R-1 upwards m order of issuance or in such other order as the Regisuar may determine and shall be m the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof not exceeding the amount maturing in any year. 3 The Bonds are being issued to provide financing of estimated costs in the minimum amount of $________. including contract price, constmetion interest and legal fiscal and miscellaneous costs for certain local impros emems of the City piquant to the authority of Chapter 429, Minnesota Statutes, referred to as Shoreline Dnve/Hentage Lane, Orono Orchards and Edgewood Hills, and also to provide additiona mteresun the amount of S in the form of obligations as authonzed m Section 475.56, Minnesota Statutes. cotJsisting of bonds maturing in 2001 . The City Council has made all necessary investigation and hereby finds and determines as follows: a. The City Council has held a public hearing after due notice regarding each such improvement and has ordered in each such improvement b. Contract for the construction of each such improvement will be entered into within the time prescribed by law. -3- •JUN. 2- :9'^9 5:40AM EHLESS M550C.NO. A?00 P. 5 ' c. Each such improvement will be a special benefit to property in the City and that the total cost of such improvements is at least the amount set forth above. d. Special assessments for each such improvement may and will be levied on the benefited property in an amount equal to at least 20% of the cost thereof. 4. The Bonds, the Registrar’s Authentication Certificate and the form of assignment shall be in substantially the following form: -4- L •JUN. 25. 1999 8:40AM EHLERS i ASSOC.';0.4700 c f. UNITED STATES OF AMERJiCA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO No. GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BOND, SERIES 1999 Interest Rate Maturity Date of Original Issue July 1,1999 CUSIP Registered Owner: Principal Amount: The City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner specified above, or registered assigns, the Principal Amount specified above on the maturity date specified above, upon the presentation ^d surrender hereof, and to pay to the Registered Owner hereof interest on such Pnncipal Amount at the Interest Rate specified above from July 1,1999, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for as specified below, on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing Fcbmary 1,2000, until sa.d principal amount is paid. Principal is payable in lawful money of the United States of A^en« at the office of Firstar Bank of Minnesota, N.A., in Minneapolis, Minnesota, ^ Bond Regis.rar or of its successor as Bond Registrar designated by the City upon 60 (toys' registered owners at their registered addresses. Interest shall be paid on each February 1 and August 1 interest payment date by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name *is Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day of the month preceding each interest payment date (whether or not a business day) at said person’s address set lorth on me registrar books maintained by the Bond Registrar, .^y such interest not or provided for will cease to be payable to the owner of record as of suiih regular record dates and such defaulted interest may be paid to the person in w'hose name this Bond ^ registered at the close of business on a special record date for the payment of such defaulted interest established by the Bond Registrar. The Bonds of this scries maturing on or after February 1,2009, arc subject to bank where me Bonds are payable and to the registered owners in the manner pro\ ided by -5- JU*J. 25. 1999 S:4(:AV EHieRS M$>OC.NO. 4700 F. 1 Chapter 475, Minnesota Statutes. Any defect in mailing notice of redemption shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for redemption. Any Bond called for redemption, and for the payment of which moneys are set aside by the City on the redemption date, shall not bear interest after the redemption date, regardless of any delay in its presentation. During such time as this Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), the method of payment, notice of redemption and cenain other matters are subject to the terms of a Blanket Letter ot Representations executed by the City and DTC prior to the date of issuance of the Bonds as such Blanket Letter of Representations may be amended from time to time. This Bond is one of an issue of Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of SI 190 000 all of like date and tenor except as to maturity, interest rate and redemption privilege, issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constimtion and Laws of the State of Minnesota, including Chapter 429, Minnesota Statutes, for the purpose of providing funds for various sewer and water improvements identified in the Resolution described below- and this Bond is payable primarily from taxes levied and special assessments levied or to be levied from its Improvement Bonds of 1999 Fund, but this Bond constitutes a general obligation of the City and to provide moneys for the prompt and full payment of said principal and interest as the same become due the full faith and credit of the City is hereby irrevocably pledged, and the Citv will levy additional ad valorem taxes on all taxable propeny in the City, if required for such purpose, without limitation as to rate or amount. This Bond is transferable, as provided by the Resolution of the City Council authorizing the issuance of the Bonds of this series adopted June 28,1999 (the ‘'Resolution') onlv upon books of the City kept at the office of the Bond Registrar by the Registered Ovmer hereof in person or by the Registered 0^vner’s duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Bond for transfer at the office of the Bond Registrar, duly endorsed by, or accompanied by a v^Titten instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Bond Registrar duly executed by the Registered Owner hereof or the Registered Outer’s duly authorized attorney, and, upon payment of any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer, one or more fully registered Bonds of the series of the same pnncipal amount, maturity and interest rate will be issued to the designated transferee or tt^sferees. The Registered Owner of this Bond may be treated as the absolute owner hereof for a purposes. The Bonds of this series are issuable only as fully registered bonds without coupons in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof not exceeding the principal amount maturing in any one year. As provided in the Resolution ^d su jec o cenain limitations therein set forth, the Bonds of this series are exchangeable for a like aggregate principal amount of Bonds of this scries of a different authorized denomination, as 6- ■JUN. 25. 1999 8:41AM EHLERS USSOC.m. 4700 P. 6 requested by the Registered Owner or the owner’s duly authorized attorney uport surrender thereof to the Bond Registrar. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have been done, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form, time and manner as required by law and that this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the City outstanding on the date of its issuance, does not exceed any constitutional or statutory' limitation of indebtedness. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose until the Certificate of Authentication and Registration hereon shall have been signed by the Bond Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Orono, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be cxecutc^d in its behaif by the facsimile sipiature of the Mayor and by the facsimile signature of the City Clerk, all as of the Date of Original Issue specitied above. Dated: (Facsimile Signature) Mayor ^Tacsimile Signature! City Clerk Bond Registrar’s Certificate of Authentication and Registration -7- •JUN. 25. 1 999 8:41AM EHLERS & ASSOC.\0.4700 P. 9 This is one of the Bonds described in the within mentioned Resolution and this Bond has been registered as to principal and interest in the name of the Registered Owner identified above on the registration books of the City of Orono, Minnesota. FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA, N.A. Bond Registrar Authorized Signature -8- . MUN. 25. 1 999 8:41 AM EHLERS ^ ASSOC.^0. <i/00 0 ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto (Please Prim or Typewrite Name and Address of Transferee) the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints ______________attome>’ to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, vvith full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Please Insert Social Security Number or Other Identifying appears Number of Assignee Assignee Signature Guaranteed: Signatures must be guaranteed by a national bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having membership in one of the major stock exchanges. Notice: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it on the face of this Bond in every’ particular, without alteration or any change whatever. 5. The Bonds shall be payable upon presentation at die office of Firstar Bank of Minnesota, N.A., in Minneapolis, Minnesota, as Registrar and Paying Agent, or at the offices of such other successor agents as the City may hereafter designate upon 60 days' mailed notice to the registered owners at their registered addresses. Interest shall be paid by check or draft of the Registrar mailed to the registered owners at their addresses shown on the registration books on each interest payment date unless other arrangements satisfactory' to the Bond Registrar the City and the registered owners of Bonds are made. The City shall deposit funds with the Bond Registrar at the time and in the manner necessary to provide for the full and prompt payment of such principal and interest. 6. The Bonds shall be prepared in typewritten or printed form under the direction of the City Clerk and when so prepared shall be e.xecutcd on bchalt of the City by the facsimile signature of the Mayor and by the facsimile signature of the City Clerk. The Bonds -9- JU\. 25. 1999 Si'iiAV EHi ESS USSOC.NO. ^700 rr. shall not be valid for any purpose until authenticated by the Bond Registrar. The Bond Registrar is authorized and directed to register the Bonds initially issued hereunder in such names as the purchaser may direct. The Bonds initially issued hereunder shall be registered as of July 1, 1999, and all Bonds issued in e.xchange therefor shall be registered as of such date, or, if issued after the first payment date, as of the most recent interest payment date on which interest was paid or duly provided for. When the Bonds shall have been so prepared and executed, they shall be delivered by the Finance Director in e,\change for the purchase price and upon receipt of the signed legal opinion of Faegre Si Benson LLP, as Bond Counsel, and the purchaser shall not be required to see to the proper application of the proceeds. 7. (a) For purposes of this paragraph 7, the following terms shall have the following meanings: “Beneficial Ow'ner” shall mean, whenever used with respect to a Bond, the person recorded as the beneficial o\%Tier of such Bond by a Participant on the records of such Participant, or such person ’s subrogee. “Cede & Co." shall mean Cede & Co., the no.Tiinee of DTC, and any successor nominee of DTC with respect to the Bonds. “DTC" shall mean Depository' Trust Company, New York, New York “Panicipants ’ shall mean those broker-dealers, banks and other financial institutions for w'hich DTC holds Bonds as securities depository. “Representation Letter" shall mean the Blanket Letter of Representations from the City to DTC, with respect to obligations issued from time to time by the City, substantially in the form on file in the office of tlie City Clerk. (b) The Bonds shall be Initially issued as separate authenticated fully registered bonds, and one Bond shall be issued in the principal amount of each stated maturity of the Bonds. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of such Bonds shall be registered in the bond register of the City kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. The Registrar and the City may treat DTC (or its nominee) as the sole and e.xclusive owner of the Bonds registered in its name for the purposes of payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, selecting the Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed, giving any notice permitted or required to be given to registered owmers of Bonds under this Resolution, registering the transfer of Bonds, and tor all other purposes w'hatsoever; and neither the Registrar nor the City shall be affected by any notice to the contrary’. Neither the Registrar nor the City shall have any responsibility or obligation to any Participant, any person claiming a beneficial ownership interest in the Bonds under or through DTC or anj Participant, or any other person which is not showTi on the registration books of the Registrar -10- .‘JuN. 25. 1 999 8:41Afy1 EKLER: AS>OC.^iO. 4700 f. 12 35 being a registered owner of any Bonds, with respect to the accuracy of any records maintained by DTC or any Participant, w'ith respect to the payment by DTC or any Participant of any amount with respect to the principal of or interest on the Bonds, with respect to any notice which is permitted or required to be given to owners of Bonds under this Resolution, with respect to the selection by DTC or any Participant of any person to receive payment in the event of a partial redemption of the Bonds, or with respect to any consent given or other action taken by DTC as registered owner of the Bonds. The Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on the Bonds only to Cede & Co. in accordance with the Representation Letter, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal of and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond for each separate staled maturity evidencing the obligation of the City to make payments of principal and interest. Upon delivery by DTC to the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the Bonds will be transferable to such new nominee in accordance with subparagraph (f) hereof. (c) In the event the City determines tliat it is in the best interest of the Beneficial Owners that they be able to obtain Bond certificates, the City may notify DTC and the Registrar, whereupon DTC shall notify the Participants, of the availability through DTC of Bond certificates. In such event, the Bonds will be transferable in accordance with subparagraph (0 hereof. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and the Registrar and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event the Bonds will be transferable in accordance with subparagraph (f) hereof. (d) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution apparently to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the nsune of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, all payments with respect to the principal of and interest on such Bond and all notices with respect to such Bond shall be made and given, respectively, to DTC as provided in the Representation Letter. (e) The Representation Letter to DTC is hereby confirmed and expressly made applicable to the Bonds. The Representation Letter sets forth certain matters with respect to, among other things, notices, consents and approvals by registered owners of the Bonds and Beneficial Owners and payments on the Bonds. The Registrar shall have the same rights with respect to its actions thereunder as it has with respect to its actions under this Resolution. (f) In the event that any transfer or exchange of Bonds is permitted under subparagraph (b) or (c) hereof, such transfer or exchange shall be accomplished upon receipt by the Registrar from the registered owners thereof ot the Bonds to be transferred or -11- o\. 25. 1 999 8:<12AV EHIERS 4 AiSOC.\CU7i)i) F. 13 ■ exchanged and appropriate instruments of transfer to the permitted transferee in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 8 hereof. 8. As long as any of the Bonds issued hereunder shall remain outstanding, the City shall maintain and keep at the office of the Bond Registrar an office or agency for the payment of the principal of and interest on such Bonds, as in this Resolution provided, and for the registration and transfer of such Bonds, and shall also keep at said office of the Bond Registrar books for such registration and transfer. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond at the office of the Bond Registrar with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner ’s duly authorized attorney, and upon payment of any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer, the City shall execute and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more fully registered Bonds of the same series, of any authorized denominations and of a like aggregate principil amount, interest rate and maturity. The Bonds, upon surrender thereof at the office of the Bond Registrar, may, at the option of the registered owner thereof, be exchanged for an equal aggregate principal amount of Bonds of the same maturity and interest rate of any authorized denominations. In all cases in which the privilege of exchanging Bonds or transferring fiilly registered Bonds is exercised, the City shall execute and the Bond Registrar shall deliver Bonds in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. For ever>’ such exchange or transfer of Bonds, whether temporarj ’ or definitive, the City or the Bond Registrar may make a charge sufficient to reimburse it for any tax, fee or oihcr governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such e.xchange or transfer, which sum or sums shall be paid by the person requesting such exchange or treuisfer as a condition precedent to the exercise of the privilege of making such exchange or transfer. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution, the cost of preparing each new Bond upon each exchange or transfer, and any other expenses of the City or the Bond Registrar incurred in connection therewith (except any applicable tax, fee or other governmental charge) shall be paid by the City. The City and the Bond Registrar shall not be obligated to make any such exchange or transfer of Bonds during the fifteen (15) days next preceding the date of redemption in the case of a proposed redemption of Bonds or to make any transfer during the fifteen (15) days ne.xt preceding any February 1 or August 1 interest payment date. 9. Interest on any Bond which is payable, and is punctually paid or duly provided for, on any interest payment date shall be paid to the person in whose name that Bond (or ane or more Bonds for which such Bond was exchanged) is registered at the close of business on the 15th day of the month preceding such interest payment date. Any interest on any Bond which is payable, but is not punctually paid or duly provided for, on any interest payment date shall fortliwith cease to be payable to the registered holder on the relevant regular record date solely by virtue of such holder having been such holder; and such defaulted interest may be paid by the City in any lawful manner, if, after notice given by the City to the Bond Registrar of the proposed pa>Tnent pursuant to iliis paragraph, such payment shall be -12- *JUN. 25. 1999 8:42AV EHLERS MSSOC.fiO. 4/1)0 P. 14 deemed practicable by the Bond Registrar. Subject to the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, each Bond delivered under this Resolution upon transfer of or in e.xchange for or in lieu of any other Bond shall carry all the rights to interest accrued and unpaid, and to accrue, which were carried by such other Bond and each such Bond shall bear interest from such date that neither gain nor loss in interest shall result from such transfer, exchange or substitution. 10. As to any Bond, the City and the Bond Registrar and their respective successors, each in its discretion, may deem and treat the person in whose name the same for the time being shall be registered as the absolute owner thereof for all purposes and neither the City nor the Bond Regisirai* nor their respective successors shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Payment of or on account of the principal of any such Bond shall be made only to or upon the order of the registered owner thereof, but such registration may be changed as above provided. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. 11. There is hereby created a special fund, to be known as the Improvement Bonds of 1999 Fund, for purpose of paying principal and interest on the Bonds, and in the event the principal of and interest upon the said Bonds shall become due and payable and there are insufficient moneys in said fund to pay such principal and interest, the City Treasurer is authorized and directed to pay said principal and interest from the general fund and thereafter to reimburse said general fund from collections of taxes levied pursuant hereto and special assessments for the Improvements. The proceeds of the Bonds herein authorized shall be deposited in a separate construction fund to be used solely for the payment of expenses of such Improvements. Any remaining proceeds may be used for any lawful purpose. All future collections of special assessments for the Improvements are hereby irrevocably appropriated and pledged to the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds herein authorized, and the moneys and investments in the Improvement Bonds of 1999 Fund shall be used for no other purpose than to pay principal and interest on the Bonds until such principal and interest shall have been paid in full; provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall prevent the issuance and sale of additional bonds payable from the proceeds of such assessments to provide additional funds to pay the balance of the cost of said Improvements. The City is hereby authorized to levy assessments for said Improvements for which special assessments have not heretofore been levied. The City Treasurer may create separate accounts within the Improvement Bonds of 1999 Fund for any capitalized interest and for assessment prepa>Tnents. 12. There is hereby levied upon all the taxable property in the City a direct annual ad valorem tax which shall be spread upon the tax rolls and collected as part of other general ad valorem taxes of the City in the years and amounts as follows; -13- JUN. 25. 1999 8:43AM EHLERS ASSOC.\0.4700 P. 15 ' Levy Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Collection Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20U 2014 Amount Said levy shall be irrepealable and the taxes so levied are irrevocably appropriated to the debt service fund, but the City reserves the right to reduce said lcv>* in the manner and to the extent permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. It is hereby found and determined that the foregoing taxes, if collected in full, will, together with the estimated collection of pledged special assessments, produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the payments of principal and interest on the Bonds; but the Bonds are general obligations of the City to which the full faith, credit and unlimited taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby pledged; and the City Council shall levy general ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City, if necessary, to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due. 13. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Bonds, certified copies of all proceedings and records relating to the issuance of said General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999 and to the right, power and authority of the City and its officers to issue the same, and said certified copies and certificates shall be deemed the representations of the City as to all matters stated therein. 14. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, on file with the Clerk and presented to this meeting, is hereby approved and its designation as a “near final” Official Statement for purposes of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the furnishing thereof to prospective purchasers of the Bonds are hereby ratified and contirmed, insofar as the .‘?ame relates to the Bonds and the sale thereof. The Continuing Disclosure Certificate included in the Official Statement is hereby approved and shall be executed and -14- ‘JUN. 25. 1999 8:43AM EHLERS 4 ASSOC.NO. 47(11) F. 16 delivered in connection with the deliver^' of the Bonds. The Continuing Disclosure Certificate constitutes a contractual obligation in accordance with its terms. 15. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Secretary of the Treasury a statement meeting the information reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”)> by the 15th day of the second calendar month after the close of the calendar quarter in which the Bonds are issued. 16. The City shall not take or permit any action that would cause the Bonds to be “private activity bonds*’ within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code. The City shall comply with the rebate requirements imposed under Section 148(1) of the Code and regulations thereunder, including (if applicable) the requirement to make periodic calculations of the amount subject to rebate thereunder and the requirement to make all required rebates to the United States. The Finance Director of the City is hereby authorized to make on behalf of the City all elections that he may deem necessaiy and expedient under Section 148 of the Code. In addition, the City shall make no investment of funds that would cause the Bonds to be “arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and regulations thereunder. All terms used in this paragraph 16 shall have the meanings provided in the Code and regulations thereunder. 17. The Bonds are hereby designated “qualified tax exempt obligations” for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. IS. The City Clerk shall furnish a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, and obtain the County Auditor’s certificate as required by law. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Nlember__________________upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -15- JUN. 251999 8:43AM EHLERS 4 ASSOC ^0.4700 P. 17 ' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF ORONO ) SS. ) ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Orono, Minnesota, hereby cenify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held June 28,1999 with the original thereof on file and of record in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to the issuance and sale of $1,190,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Scries 1999 of said City. WITNESS My hand officially and the seal of the City this June, 1999. City Clerk City of Orono, Minnesota (Seal) MI:SII743.01 -16- COUNCIL MEETING JUN 2 8 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 28. 1999 Cl IY Of Oh UNO ITEM NO.: 3 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer ’s Report Item Description: Public Hearing for Weber Hills Sanitary Sewer Project Public Hearing Format We are recommending the following format for the public hearing. 1. Staff present an overview of the project background and proposed plan. 2. Council questions of staff 3. Questions from the public 4.Comments from the public 5. Council consideration and decision Background Information A feasibility study has been completed and two neighborhood meetings were held to discuss this project. At the first meeting, a gravity sewer system with a municipal lift station was discussed at an estimated cost of approximately $29,000 per unit. The residents objected to the high costs for this project and the major disruption to the neighborhood resulting from project construction. In response to the resident concerns, costs for a grinder pump system were developed. Each resident would be required to purchase, install and maintain their own grinder pump for this system. The estimated cost for a grinder pump system is $16,500 per unit. This cost estimate also includes a $5,000 per unit allowance for property owners to purchase their own grinder pump station. A second neighborhood meeting was held and the residents favored the grinder system option. A neighborhood survey was conducted, by several project area residents, and our understanding is that approximately 75% of the residents favor a grinder pump sewer system. There are thiny- seven properties in the project area. Twenty-six properties have nonconforming septic systems. 1 ■ i Six properties have newer confomiing mound systems, and two properties have older conforming trench systems. Sewer and Septic System Issues On the attached map, I have sketched in 100’ x 50' rectangles to show the approximate space needed for a mound system. These locations are for illustrative purposes only, and site topography and soil conditions will control actual system locations. A review of the attached map shows that some lots are shown with only one new site, or no sites, because of the lot sizes and that the existing systems have already disturbed part of tlie lot. The fact that some lots may only have one available septic site is a concern. Without a replacement site, property owners will be in trouble if there are future problems with the new mound system. It is also possible that some properties may not have any septic sites available. To verify that conforming septic sites are available for all properties, soil borings and detailed site investigations would need to be completed for all of the properties in the project. Another issue for consideration is future requests for variances from the septic regulations to allow installation of mound systems on sites that do not meet all of the code requirements. The granting of variances could result in the installation of septic systems with a higher potential for failure. The installation of new mound systems will also result in the removal of trees and will use a large area of the property. The proposed pressure sewer system will require that the property owners operate and maintain their own grinder pump. This concern is offset by the fact that mound septic systems will also require operation and maintenance of pumps to pump waste water into the mound. Several residents are questioning the need for and benefit of moving away from septic systems to sanitary sewer. Letters outlining their concerns are attached. Staff Recommendation We realize that neighborhood residents are divided over this issue, and that the ultimate decision on sewer or septic for Weber Hills will be made by the project area residents, as they will be assessed for the project costs. Our staff recommendation is that the installation of sewer to serve this neighborhood is the best long term solution, and a decision to rely on septic systems would be shortsighted and result in future problems. We also believe that a decision on sewer versus septic needs to be made now. Today, there only a few properties with new septic systems, but as more residents install new septic systems it will be more difficult to gain neighborhood approval for a sewer project. If nothing is done now, this issue may become very controversial in several years when the City is forced to order the upgrading of non compliant septic systems. After new mound systems are installed, residents may find the results from tree loss and other property impacts undesirable; but by this time it may be too late to gain approval of a sewer project. It is also possible that some properties may not have septic sites available which will result in major hardships and loss of property value. In summary, we believe that the installation of sewer is the best long terra solution for the Weber Hills neighborhood; and the decision made now will have a long term effect. A resolution ordering preparation of plans and specifications is attached for Council consideration. If a decision to proceed with the project is made, the proposed schedule would be for project design this year and construction in 2i mil The intent is to sell bonds in 2000 to finance this project. The recommendation of our bonding consultant, to meet Federa’ tax law requirements, is that if preparation of plans and specifications is ordered that the motion also include a statement regarding the proposed construction and bonding schedule for this project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve resolution ordering the preparation of plans and specifications for the Weber Hills Sanitary Sewer Project with project construction and bonding to be completed in 2l III r^' SfU/giL (|ji^ ADPP.ES5 WUM&» ----w nn cifi-cu j\XOU * 0)Kl F^?lU\AV4tJ • SEPT^C SySTEN\ f-SCALi I 1—I-----1 0 lao zdi E»i Wi•;ept\<: S V i’T f/vi lOfl SOOixSQ-llLol Mu-m S ITE ^TyP) Lot tiSq,(A\)i^s- AM^MnIALA^aw A ?/TE TyP\c/iU f^mKKO s ^ p<jww C'MFon. tu.Msin-jn\^nvi o'uLyy ■ox ,:-5jynrer OM \» X\oo Xo*\o •XOf)o 7^ 2,10.HiT Hkjl Ms ISO .1-16- w ^0<^Q lNA(toi4\? los^ 7J>\ • • A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WEBBER HILLS AREA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared a feasibility study to determine the feasibility of serving the Webber Hills neighborhood with sanitary sewer; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 1999 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4287 receiving the feasibility report and calling for a public hearing for Webber Hills sanitary sewer improvements; and WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 28th day of June, 1999, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for the installation of sanitary sewer for the Webber Hills neighborhood. Adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on June 28, 1999 by a vote of____ayes and_____nays. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: L.ndd S. Vee, City Clerk ' ^ 6//09 'T2> iUMiJ l4ovu • WjMuiWd^hxAZ'yti L Qi^AjO^<yuA, O'^ /'LO'U^UZ. COn^^bMAi/ui-d^ci Jfi/iAlUtSLy C^ jUlkt Uw^;u^w^- a.. 'TM t 3,,Xw€ <s- Ju^ozi, ^ &JUi(Uy- Q2UA^cf^;t&7Vi^?u-> y ----------—<l/lA^ „J:^ jEd^iaimd . S iB^^ mddJ>^ ckaJ^t^ ^ .ow>zm M:&yyi ^ 7„. A.XtM’ ' '<Kf/)mvonzL JC/2. ilioon tmi ;fri^ $£/rri£<iti^ to^h^JhoA. (krnd lu^ Cffyyi /ym%i 4mns. uc^. CMdu ^JM^^i/)U V’^075 lvjM(il7i^ (^jjx)wwM^^^f>H(i7jm^ 195'^ . » Dear Webber Hills Area Residents, June 14, 1999 I am writing this letter in regard to the hearing about our sewer/septic issues at the upcoming City Council meeting on the 28th of this month at 7:00 P.M. This is a City Council Meeting. A decision will more than likely be made regarding the future of our sewer/septic issue, so regardless of your position on the subject, I think everj’one should attend. I believe we have all received the 2 letters sent recently, the one dated May 1st from an area resident(s), as well as the one from Greg Gappa at Orono about assessment charges for a potential grinder pump system After reading both letters, and especially the resident one, it raised some questions in my mind about how completely the issues were dealt with, and simply about what system might be best based on cost and practicality. The city had initially proposed a gravity flow system, which I think has been universally rejected. The May 1st letter I think it is fair to say praised the grinder pump system and criticized mound systems. My personal opinion is that the trench/mound private septic s>'stem has merit too. In the past few days I have made a number of calls to people who know waste treatment issues well (certainly better than myself), and have included the attached supporting documents and names and phone numbers where appropriate. I currently have a compliant, conforming mound system that has been trouble free for the 3 years I have lived in Webber HSlls. When we bought here it was for the schools and location. Having never had private well/septic system I knew nothing about them, only that the quality of the well water far outweighed any septic system concerns I had. Personally it would have made little difference had there been city sewer in making the house attractive to buy, and even less of a monetary difference. I don’t want to spend over $20, 000 for a system I don’t need (see below). My mound is 13 years old, probably the first one placed here, and may need to be replaced in 7 years(I’ll probably live here for 20). I’d rather have the mound re-graded or re-sighted than go the grinder pump route for the reasons listed below. You can see from the attached bona-fide bids for mound systems that both came in under $10,000 . Both compames are relatively close by, and are state licensed septic pumpers. However, realistically I think the cost would be at least $12,000 after engineering plans and other incidental costs are considered. Listed below are a few things that I found out recently about the issues: Costs Following are the approximate costs for the grinder pump system This is from both written (we all recewed) and verbal communication from Greg Gappa at Orono. • Basic Assessment: $ 12,000.00 (Puts main sewer pipe in yard along road plus (6.4.99 letter) connectioL stub on each property) • Grinder Pump Allowance $ 4,500.00 (City will allow you to finance the cost of the _______ grinder pump, a good one runs around $4000) A ssessment from Orono $16,500.00 The following are costs over and above the $16,500 city assessment that each property owner must pay. They come directly from the letter dated 6-10-98 by Greg. • Sewer AvaUability Charge S 1050.00 (This is a 1999 figure, one time charge) • Cost to hook up individual sewer lines to street main, abandon old septic. S 2-3,000.00 (I would bet on $3,000 plus) • City permit for connection S 35.00 Total Approximate Cost to Put in Giinder Pumps Initially is About S 20,0001, Annual sewer charges are also about $ 310 per year. Other non -monetary considerations are as follows: Since the letter of May 1st dealt with concerns about mound systems, I have some concerns about a grinder pump system. With a Grinder s>'stem, the force main will be in someone’s front yard on one side of Shevlin and Webber Hills, 3-5 yards off the curb. I would guess that some pretty heavy equipment is used for dredging and placing a pipe of that size below the frost line, and that would not be kind to our front yards, not to mention the impact on our two streets.What about the pipe that nms from the grinder to the street? Most grinder pumps will be installed in one of the 2 or 3 existing septic tanks, which is in everyone’s back yard. Again, imagine digging a trench below the frost line all the way from the back yard to the front. I would bet that there are some trees or landscaping that would be in the way. You could re-route your sewer out the front of the house, but I wouldn’t even guess at the cost of that. Plus then you would have a grinder pump to go along with your well head sitting in the front yard. • What about the grinder pump itself? How much would it cost to repair/replace if it jams or breaks (based on a new, good pump @ $4000)? On the oAer hand a septic pump distributes gray waste water that has gone through 2 or 3 settling tanks, and is not nearly as complicated. A private septic s>'stem in general is low-tech. » Everyone in the area will be ultimately assessed for the cost of the grinder pump system if it goes through. It is true that you can opt out if you have a compliant/conforming septic system (33% in Webber Hills do). However, whenever you decide to: A) sell your house B) refinance your house, (I confirmed A and B with Harry Buseth at Bell.Mortgage) or C) voluntarily hook up, you will be assessed the cost of the new sewer. Furthermore, every year you don’t coimect, the cost ofthe assessment goes up reflective of inflation and interest on the bond money. I confirmed the principle, not the costs with Greg Gappa at Orono. Last Summer the rate on the bonds to be issued was approximate ^ **• ‘ 25 ^ !: you assume therefore that fee inflation and debt service cost 8%/year, v fao decides not to hook up until 10 yearsfi'omnowcouldpay $35,000 instead ofthe initial $20,000 ($16,500 x 8% X 10 plus the $5,000 to hook up to the street). • No one will force us to hook up to city sewer if compliant/coiiformmg private septic systems are kept. The people that know will tell you that an ISTS (Individual Septic Treatment System) does a better job of treating household waste than does a municipal sewage treatment plant, period. Treatment plants do the best they can with high volumes of waste, then flush what ’s left where they can. It is true that the MUSA line was expanded to include Orono in the mid 90 ’s, but only to afford the opportunity to hook up if needed to municipal sewer. There have been Developments (Le., Orono Orchards and North Long Lake) where lot sizes were simply too small ( 1/4 to 1/2 acre) to properly support private septic ( we are around an acre). They are now on city sewer. However, Both the MetropoUtan Council and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency take no position officially on whether city sewer or private septic is better for individual homeowners. You can talk to either Jack Frost at the Met Council @ 651-602-1078 or Lori Frekot at the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency @ 651-296-8762 to verify this. Alternatives For those households that cannot install mounds( le. would need holding tanks) or don ’t want to, I have attached material from Jim Anderson at the U of M. I believe this is the information people wanted at the pubhc hearings last Stimmer, and the final design and regulatory criteria will be finalized in 2000. My imderstanding is that these systems can be used in an add-on fashion without necessarily creating an entire new septic system (The costs hsted in the table are for entire new systems). Again, the issue in Webber Hills and Orono in general is the high water table and the need for a reasonable separation between waste water and groimd water. However, I feel the need to make the same offer that the letter dated 5-1 did. If you carmot attend the meeting, and would like me to represent your position on keeping private septic systems, please fill in the space below and return to me. Thanks for taking the time to read this. Sincerely, Please represent me at the hearing in favor of private septic systems, I will not be attending: Name, Address, Date Return to: Dave Williams 2055 Webber Hills Road 476-1093 SWEDLUNO PROPOSAL Swedlund Septic — Service PBOPOSAU suBunreo to Dave WilliamssTRser 2055 Webber Hills Road CJTV,STAT£. ZIP Orono. MM Wo horoby submit cpocificattons and ostlmatos for; PHONE Ineta Lystem aooor<^ltLq tn the> ■agpr^ved Bl^ ------------- ^t.«r iElE ,, Wifl.d In rhn ^rpMo ,, ^istricai vtrs and ronTifrl-ion at r.h. -^imUnr lint no^. .. .k, t----Mound vn i .be graded . on o isgp^ic SY>iAam desiianpj fpr a fnnr bedmr,,. h—) '= n-««ial ,nd lab,,, comp.,,, i„ .«o,d.n« wi», ,bo« ,p.dnc=.io„s, ,^n, of: -------HLadted End Mo^lOO ____________________________,, g .nn Payment to bo made as follows: Any dovlatlon from the work outlined in this preposal may result in additional charges. This proposal may be vvj Authorized Signature if not led with 30 A cceptance of Proposal —The above prices, specifications niTc «r Ar^c and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are ptancs . authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.SiCHATURC Swedlund Septic Service • fr520 Lrj<ecown Road » Cha.ska. MN’. 442-5855 5^ ' State c erti ft Eb' • ELMER J. PETERSON COMPANY 5921 DAGUE AVE. S.E. DELANO, MINNESOTA 55328 AL & JIM 6RAEGELMANN (612) 471*^i5l • (612) 972*2420 June 9, 1999 Dave Williams 2055 Webber Hills Road Orono, MN. 55391 FAX# 476-1093 Average cost for a 3 - 4 bedroom hornet Install mound system on open site $8/000t00 *• $10^000#00t This price does NOT include the percolation test and design. No tree or brush removal, no site clearingt WE PROPOSE to fwrnfsh l3bor end material — complete !rt accordance with above specifications, and subject to conditions found on both sides of this agreement, for the sum of: dollars ($,_________)• Payment to be made as follows:________ mm • ACCirrto. m I&4V* P"cil. ip«€mMHoni •"'*/“"'J"'®''* ”o,l ,, tor, ti>a sr$ f.titi/ tiuetti. You •'« VlWt) Atsptctfull/ tubfflidid. Da!* of Accepfpnc* By — ELMER J. PETE^N COMPANY By. . NoirTMi P'ep4iil mty t» mitna/t„n b/utu «o! *ec«?t»* dty jterccT'J^tMj9iil/ACCePTANC£ r;Ai» vf’z:: University of Minnesota Februaiy I I, 1999 ?VIr. Jack Frost Metropolitan Council MearS Park Center 230 E Fifth St St Paul MN 55101 :;'rr :C::c r.xc.3:c:;:::‘: ? \^'ttlcr Rn^utircus Center ( oj Siifnml Hi iouri tv #»/ A Jinx, idiitrui f'ut.d. Envtronmtf^Uti 5< (srf?r r» Untvfr^ttv /.'/Mtm:r\$»ui Vii/^c m /.■^/.t Clrv^fanef A vfnfte Nonh St. Paul MsM %M()H 6()0r 6f2‘6U V;.V7 if1 2-625-22^2 rat. 612-625-1262 Dear Jack: Enclosed is a copy of the cost tables that we have prepared for alternative sewage treatment systems. This completes the infonnation for the alternative system white paper. As you arc aware this by no means ends the revision and evaluation of treatment system costs. We will update you on any changes or additiotis that we make in the future. This information w'ill also be presented to the ISTS Advisory Committee and at other meetings in the future. If you have any questions or would like additional information let me kjjow. I can be reached at 612-625-8209.1 would like to thank you for your considerable patience and help as we worked our way through this exercise. S^erely, • •,. James L. Anderson Co-Director Water Resources Center • • Attachments: WRS Report Alternative Systems Costs CC: Tom Wegner Ken Olson Dave Gustafson FROM KCZS-. • • • ^ I • V - / , • • • » A • • • • X • • « * '*- *. .. ..*••• **v;.^ ^• • • Alternative Sewage Treatment System Installation, Operation, and Maintenance Costs J.L. Anderson, D. Gustafson, and K. Olson University of Minnesota Extension Service Excessively high construction costs and lack of federal subsidies for building regional wastewater treatment plants has refocused many public officials and leaders on the question of how to provide affordable wastewater treatment alternatives to rural residents. Individual or on-site sewage treatment systems may be part of tlie answer. There are a variety of technologies, that are being used or evaluated to provide on-sitc treatment. These can be matched to fit each unique set of circumstances encountered by communities, technologies, or individuals. All onsite sewage treatment system for an individual residence typically consists of the house jewer, the sewage tank (septic or aerobic), the outlet sewer and distribution lines, a senes of drain field trenches, a seepage bed or a sewage treatment mound. As local government units evaluate their wastewater treatment needs, they need to assess not only the use of these standard or t3^ical systems, but also the suitability of technologies where wastewater (sewage tank effluent or raw wastewater) is collected from a group or cluster of residences and delivered to a single location for final treatment and dispersal. In most cases this leads to the use of some of alternative technologies in combination with more typical treatment units. Alternatives include, aerobic tanks or package plants, constructed wetlands, sand or peat filters and alternative means of soil dispersal such as drip irrigation. A typical sequence for the individual residence then becomes, bouse sewer, sewage tank (usually septic tank), outlet to collector sewer, common soil treatment (dispersal) area. ... Construction (or installation) costs of these different types of on-site technologies is one major question that local governments need sound objective answers. In addition, they need to know the long term management costs of the alternatives and combinations to decide if they are an affordable option. Individuals also need information on what it costs to install and maintain these systems. Installation costs can vary from less than S2,000 to well over $10,000 per residence depending on site conditions and the land of system needed. Having cost informarion available allows individuals to choose the most cost effective system within the limitations imposed by the site conditions and required by ordinance^ In this section we attempt to document both the construction (installation) and operation and maintenance costs. This information is compiled and summarized from several sources including tire current Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources Alternative Sewage Ttealmcnt System Project, the Metropolitan Councils, Alternative Sewage Treatiuent Demonstration Project, a 1993 National Small Flows Clearinghouse survey, and a report from North Carolina presented at the 1996 National On-site Wastewater Recycling Association (NOWRA) Conference. In Table 1, typical ranges in costs are provided for sewage treatment options that assumes the use of a septic tank and then cither direct dispersal through sewage Ucatmc.r. -cnchcs or mound or into an alternative soil dispersal option. Annual operation and maintenance costs were determined with a base cost of cleaning a 1500 gallon septic tank every two years. Increases from this base cost were on the estimated needs for each additional component. These costs are representative for estimated flows between 450-1000 gallons per day. The total cost over a 20 year estimated system life is calculated using the mid-point of the ranges provided in the first two columns a- ’ multiplying the annual cost by 20 years. L r.^OM MCES • : !I • V*# , .«# ^ • • *.“• N S * • • VQ • • «#• • • • Table 1: Individual Sewage Treatment System Costs Sewage Treatment Options: Typical Costl (per residence) Annual Operation/ Septic Systems:Design and Installation Main ten ancc/Rcpair Total Costs Septic lank with trench S3000 to S5000 $30 to $200 $6,300 Septic tank with mound $4000 to $10,000 $80 to S500 $12,800 Septic tank with Alternative Treatment System: Constructed wetland (subsurface discharge)$5000 to 110,000 $50 to $550 $13,500 Const! ucted wetland (surface discharge)$4000 to $10,000 $1000 to $1500 $32,000 Sand or peat filter (subsurface discharge)$6000 to S8000 S500 to $1000 $22,000 Drip irrigation S7000 to $10,000 $600 to .$1700 $31,500 Aerobic tank (package plant)2 $4000 to $7500 $600 to $1700 $28,750 Holding rank (strict water use)52000 new fixtures $800 to $1500 525,000 Holding lank (normal water use)$2000 to $3000 $2000 to S5000 $70,000 Municipals '$4000 to $10,000+$200 to $400 $13,000 J '* r>plc8l" cosi figures arc shov>-Ti only to help homeowners and local govemmcnl oflicials realize potential invesonent cosu. Initial investment as well as annual operation, maintenance, replacement, and repair costs imist all be considered in making syttem choices. Actual costs may vary beyond these ranges depending on individual sites and situations. • • 2 In addition to these costs, the wastewater must be discharged to a final soil dispersal area. 3 Average Twin Cities metropolitan area cost is S167/bouschoId/year, rtngc; S88-S408; national avenge Is $212. ?RCM MCE?*:vli •w* • • • • A A A • • • • •r iC:-5 ?T. 1E:-5 NC. : Clustered Collector Systems If on*sitc options arc used with clustered development the cost pictiire changes. In this situation the individual residents share in the costs of collectmg and delivering the raw sewage or septic tank effluent to a central area for final treatment and dispersal. In the current LCNIR Alternative Sewage Treatment Systems Project two cluster systems were built, one using sewage treatment trenches and the other using a constructed wetland system. The per household cost for the installation of the collector sewer, individual septic tanks and controls to deliver the effluent to the final treatment system were $4,100 for the Lake Washington site and $6,300 for Grand Lake. In both cases the actual costs exceeded initial estimates of $3,000 to S3,500 for this part of the project. When retrofitting it should be assumed that there will be problems of tlie types encountered at these locations. A reasonable range in estimated costs for this type oi clustering activity would be 53.000 to 57,000 per household. In terms of the cost of on-site alterratives for the final treatment systems there arc some economies of scale to be gained in terms of treatment unit sizing and operation, maintenance and monitoring costs. The total cost per household at the Lake Washington and Grand Lake were 58.235 and SI I, 377 respectively. For clustered systems that serve JO-20 residences and estimated flows up to 15.000 gpd a reasonable estimate of per household costs would be to add the collector sewer coste to tlie low end to middle of the alternative treatment unit costs (lablc 2). Total costs w'cre determined by adding the average collector sewer cost to the midpoint of the installation cost to the midpoint of tlie annual operation cost multiplied by 20 years. Tabic 2. Clustered on-site sewage Treatment costs per residence Collector Sewer with on-site Treatment option Annual Operation/ Total Costs 1 Design and Installation Ma in tena nce/Repa ir Soil 7 rcatmcni Trenches $7,000 to S8,000 5200 to $400 $18,500 Soil Treatment Mounds Alternative On-Site $10,000 to $14,000 5300 to S500 525,000 Constructed Wetland (subsurface discharge)S8.000 to $16,000 $300 to 5500 $25,000 Constructed W'ctland (surface discharge)$7,000 to $16,000 51,000 to $1500 $41,500 Sand or Peat filter (subsurface discharge)$10,000 to 516,000 5500 to 51,000 $33,000 Drip Irrigation 511,000 to $16,000 $500 to $1,000 $33,500 Spray Irrigation Si 1,000 to 518,000 51,000 to SI,500 $44,500 Aerobic Tank (package plant)58,000 to $14,000 51250 to 53000 $58,500 Above nows of 15,000 to 20,000 Ballons per day sand filters and spray itiigation bejin to have sipiCcant cost advantages over the other on-silc alternatives and eontpete well with costs associated with waste stab.hzation ponds. : A* •• «.»>i) .C. *. • ?? i .*““: X• A • • • A • Currently, the jno^t trouble-&ee collector systems we iliosc where eflch residence has an adequately sized septic tank. There arc many collector systems being installed and more being planned. They can be a technically sound and economic alternative for sewage treatment. Collector systems for small groups of houses can usually solve sewage treatment problems on small lots Vrithout the large expense of municipal sanitary sewer. However, to make this determination will require a continual evaluation of both installation and operation costs as these teclmologies arc adopted and improved. . ;J1-J j; j ^ HeUo AgaiE, J'"'' ’ ^ ’^59 June 16.1999 cu Y Or c?;oi\'oI received today the letter written by the Cashmores (copy attached) and I think it brings up a lot of good points. Since it references my letter of earlier this week, I will do the best I canto better explain some of the points I made. I can understand their concerns, since they are some of the same concerns I had about the 5/1 letter, where there was little mention made of where their facts and figures came from. I will address the Cashmores letter hem by item. 1) Msntion %vas made of each property being uu.qiie. I couldn t agree more. Its a moot point anyway as far as Webber Hills and the sewer issue is concerned. Everyone will either have private septic or city sewer ultimately. The thing that I don ’t see happening is someone saying “Lets buy that house in Orono Orchards because it has city sewer and Webber Hills has private septic” 2) Construction costs should be challenged. Absolutely. I have included the fist of con^anies I received in the Summer of ‘97 on my septic inspection report (I received this even though I am compliant) for septic contractors. I chose the compames as follows. First, I wanted a bid from someone who was a State Licensed Septic Pumper ( 2 stars). T figured these people probably knew what they were doing. Second, I wanted people who had worked in Webber Hills before and were reasonably close by. By all means call and get additional info, I stopped at two bids because both were in the same ballpark. Construction costs for the grinder pump were taken directly from the city letters we have received. 3) Mound systems fail more in cold climates. Very possible. However, I vvould think that this is taken into account in the engineering phase. In any event, who said this, what is their qualification, and exactly why do mounds in cold weather fail more? Az)Smaller tractors can be used to did trenches. I agree. My point was not about the footprint left by tractors in the yard. Its about the trench dug. The cheapest and least likely to clog pipe connection from house to force main would be the shortest, least^ bending, most direct route. Its just that that direct route may go through someone ’s tree (or tree roots), flower bed, sidewalk, or drh'eway. And it only makes sense that the pipe would be below the frost line (3 or 4 feet?). h)Common trenches could be shared. Very Possibly. However, what happens when you sell either house? What do you think loan companies and prospective buyers would think of that? What if it breaks and then who would pay for it? What if one house has 4 occupants and the other 2, the larger household plugging the s>'stem? ^ One of the nice things about a private septic is that what ’s yours is yours and what s theirs is theirs. Everybody keeps their own problems. 5) Many trees could be destroyed. True. Fortunately trees are a renewable resource. They don ’t grow very fast, but I bet you could get a pretty nice sapling for SI00. All the trees in my back yard look the same and I keep cutting them down to try and carve a back yard out. I’d like to get a nice Oak or Maple back there instead of whatever small weed trees are there now. In any event, we could get a couple more storms this Summer and lose some anyway. 6)Moiind systems in front yards. Again, I refer you to the attached drav/ing provided by the city showing possible mound sites. Not one is in anyone ’s front yard.. lyPreserve environment with grinder system. I think the answer here is no. In the conversations I had with Bob Volkenant(Septic Contractor), Lori Freykot(Minnesota Pollution Control Agency), and Jack Frost(Metropolitan Council), They all said that trench(not an option for us) and Mound systems were state of the art private septic systems. I don ’t believe the public officials can go on record as saying that septic is better, (Bob did) but common sense would dictate that private systems spread waste distribution out to production sights, rather than a giant waste treatment plant flushing efiOuent as best they can treat it at one point. 8)Cost of keeping mound system compliant. I don ’t think the Cashmores realized that it is cheaper to keep a mound system compliant than to pay annual city sewer costs. They said that the cost to keep a mound con^liant ranges from $185-$300 every 2 years (assuming their costs reflect pumping and inspection fees). City Sewer annual costs were $307.40 in Greg Gappa’s letter of last Summer. So for 2 years they would be $614.80. This means you would save anywhere from $315 to $430 every 2 years with a mound system! Also, I noticed that the last time my septic was pumped was 1994, yet I continue to get a condition 5 on my report (no pumping of tanks needed). I think this is due to the 3rd tank they added to my mound system which promotes additional settling. In Summary, I think thd best thing the Cashmores said was for everyone to come to the June 28th meeting at 7:00, and I truly hope everyone does. I have also included the survey from last Fall done by Peter Lytle and Rob ?. I think they are both to be commended for the work they have put in on the project so far. 2055 Webber Hills 476-1093 Met Council @ 651-602-1078 or Lori Frekot at the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency @ 651-296-8762 to verify this. • Alternatives For those households that cannot install mounds( i.e. would need holding tanks) or don ’t want to, I have attached material from Jim Anderson at the U of M. I believe this is the information people wanted at the public hearings last Summer, and the final design and regulatory criteria will be finalized in 2000. My imderstanding is that these systems can be used in an add-on fashion without necessarily creating an entire new septic system (The costs listed in the table are for entire new systems). Agam, the issue in Webber Hills md Orono in general is the high water table and the need for a reasonable separation between waste water and ground water. I hope i have made some valid points above. I did the best 1 could to get all the facts pertaining to the issues at hand (feels a little like the school bond referendum, doesn t it 1) However, I feel the need to make the same offer that the letter dated 5-1 did. If you cannot attend the meeting, and would like me to represent your position on keeping private septic ^sterns, please fill in tbe space below and return to me. Thanks for taking the time to read this. Sincerely, Please represent me at the hearing in favor of private septic systems, I wiU not be attending: Name, Address, Dale T* . . Return to: Dave Williams 2055 Webber Hills Roac.476-1093 (SSuC. ^ lo4 V ?.7 PROi IKi Neighborhood Questionnaire S(A {LU EY IZ^SO L~I$ This information will be provided to the City of Orono per request of the city officials at the last infonnadon meeting. This information is confidential at this time, it may become public once it is provide to the City. Offices; . ■ ^ • • . ■ ••• -• • •• • , . . Septic System or Sewer? S£°/ N S vts . . '7------r !• Are you interested in the option of a traditional gravity sewer syrfem (higher impact, . ^ So [a requires extensive digging and the city estimates $26,000 plus coimection f9r each home, ^ no power require, low maintenance) being added to the neighborhood?. ^”1^^ j Q I ^0 Would you like more information about this kind of system? \Q fj[^ / 0 ^ — • ^ ' 2. Would you like to see a lower impact sewer system us^ in the neighborhood \/yrc tl> (requires a grinder and power for pumps, but requires less disruption of the streets and O' S _ lawns, costs are yet to be determined, cost considered less than traditional sewers)? ^ 6S/^. Would you like more information on this system?. ^ ^ fjO ^ '? %sV 0% «• 1 q'tS 7. I 8. Would like to look at alternative septic systems (not mound systems, these would be systems Aat could be approved for special sites, cost are suggested to be typical of other septic systems)?, y ^ S _LL- M() 3- ^ -D ^ 4. Would you like more information on these alternative systems? ^ f^O ^? 4 Would you prefer to stay with a septic system for you home and not have sewer ’ y/s a- 1^0 ± 1 ^ Would you prefer sewer for you home and have no concerns about the type of sewer systemitis? a 2 When would you like to see a decision made? If sewer is selected, is there a date you would like to see the project begin? \ SFMM6 lU 7-^ Have you installed a septic systenyecently? , >i If what year Comments (use the back for more comments): Kitf JviSWkit 1 Return to: Peter Lytle (neighborhood volunteer), 2065 Webber Hills Rd. Wayzata, Mn. 55391 Phone:473-8012 (return by 6/15/98) July 29, 1997 nmm Bauer Trucking 17751 63rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55311 559-2721 Bud Gleason 19300 63rd Avenue North Hamel, MN 55340 478-6926 Clover Hill Company, Inc. P.O. Box 354 Loretto, MN 55357 479-2297 Dasen Contracting Co, Inc. P.O. Box 169 New Market, MN 55054 461-2100 DKH Excavating, Inc.** 7700 Highway 101 Shakopee, MN 55379 445-8440 Don's Backhoe & Excavating** 110th Street Cologne, MN 55322 466-5959 Elmer J. Peterson Company** 5921 Dague Avenue Southeast Delano, MN 55328 471-8151 Hayes Excavating 263 82nd Street Southeast Montrose, MN 55363 479-1762 Ingleside Engineering 4920 Highway 55 Loretto, MN 55357 479-1869 JB Diggers , 6957 West Highway 10 Anoka, MN 55303 753-6468 Larry's Onsite Septic 4980 County Road 10 East Chaska, MN 55318 448-2176 Marty Excavating** 7185 Rutz Lake Road Mayer, MN 55360 657-2548 Patnode Brothers 23200 109th Avenue North Rogers, MN 55374 428-7393 Ritter Excavating 7120 Vernon Street Rockford, Mn 55373 477-5649 Sullivan's Services, Inc.** 3660 Highway 101 South Wayzata, MN 55391 473-4300 Swedlund Septic** 9520 Laketown Road Chaska, MN 55318 V Volkenant & Sons, Inc.** 1030 County Road 83 Maple Plain, MN 55359 479-1547 Widmer Brothers, Inc.' P.O. Box 219 St. Bonifacius, MN 55375 446-1495 ♦♦State Licensed Septic Pumpers < MENTER AND ASSOCIATES 8707 WOOD CLIFF ROAD BLOOMINGTON. MN 55438 612-944-3562 June 28, 1999 Re:Webber Hills Subdivision, Orono Mn Sanitary Sewer System Resident Questions and Conerns BACKGROUND: The Cl,y of Orono has previously identified Webbe, lowing is a brief synopsis of the history of the sewer proposals from the City of Orono. 1» In the fall of 1993 the City of Orono indicated that they were planning to Inicioa sewer system in the Webber Hills Subdivision. The City Engineer stated that a ™mes"wo“d be forced to build mound systems unless we agreed to mv,te the Oty to bu.ld a sewer system. 2) in 1994, a conceptual study was prepared by the retained engineering firm of the City of Orono, "Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik" with costs placed f‘The hnmp for th© msin lin© only. Th© syst©m conc©pt W3S for © 9 V CM In 1 qqv "Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik" issued a revised cost estimate fo. the same system as rotld fnTSr f cost-im«^^ cos. ,, I^feachTomeLTer'woUd'exceed $34,000.00. This proposal did not even include mstalla- tion of water service. 4) Based on concerns with the costs above, of tTI'reTidemI in" the residents of Webber Hills during T7”w F ow Svstem ' This concept was then ex- • • WEBBER HILLS SANITARY SEWER QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS Page 2 of 3 June 28. 1999 estimate was provided by the same engineering firm that was in error by approximately 2 to 1 in costs on the previous gravity type system which they proposed. Again the additional costs of construction from the individual homes to the main would be paid by homeowners. No discussion of contribution to costs by the City was undertaken. CURRENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS: The residents have not seen a copy of the feasibility study for this project. The residents need this study for the following reasons: The residents need to understand the details of the design of this system, including routing, pipe sizes, depths, location and design of any lift stations, etc.; The residents need to be apprised of the costs of this system and what specifically is included in these costs. For example, are individual grinder pumps a cost of the project or a cost of hookup and therefore, a resident cost? What financing alternatives were evaluated for this project and what is the anticipated contributicn by each resident? - Additionally, what evaluation was conducted to determine the effect these improve ments would have on property values? - What is the estimated cost of installing individual services? What other residents could potentially benefit from extending this sewer system to Webber Hills? If any, are these residents sharing in the cost of the project? If homes which are not included in the project at this time decide to hook-up later will the capital costs for this system and common elements such as lift stations and force mains be offset and paid down by future additions to the system with costs returned to the original paying homeowners. Does the low flow system require a fcce main to connect with existing systems down Shevlin, as the first gravity based system proposed by Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik. 5) 6) What are the estimated monthly service costs of this system? Why is the City not proposing to install water main at the same time? RECOMMENDATIONS: Table consideration of this project until residents have an opportunity to fully understand the design and cost of the project. Retain an engineering firm with e.^perierce in the design and implementation of low flow systems. J I • • WEBBER HILLS SANITARY SEWER QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS Page 3 of 3 June 28, 1999 Provide a detailed feasibility study with routing drawings and details for the grinder pump systems to be provided at each home. Provide drawings of required construction from individual homes to the main line at the street so that homeowners can get accurate costs for individual hookup to the City system. Can existing septic tanks be used for the grinder pump system required at each home. This would reduce the cost to homeowners. Obtain an accurate cost for con*-truction of the Low Flow system and provide this to all homeowners. Due to the significant increases in estimated costs in the past, the residents do not have a great deal of comfort with the current engineering firms cost estimates. CONTROL PANEl PUMP CA8LC ANO CHAIN BRAC<CT5 AT TOP SLAB ----- 1 1/2* SCH. 40 CALV. STEEL PIPE GUIDE RAILS 'NH.'ieMT hub VE».lPr L0CAT*0N WITH ENGINEER — 4* PVC rNRUENT (ffr OTHERS) 24"0tA. MIN. FlBERCLASS/POLYnKYLENE BASIN 1 1/4* ball check VALVC 1 1/4* npt gate valve 1 1/4" npt Discharge COUPLING k REDUCER I 1/2" HOPE 50R11 FORCE MA*N PLAN PUMP NOTE: 1. inlet hubs ANO FORCE MAIN ORIENTATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FiELO. 2. contractor to field verify elevations of all homeowner sewer UNES ANO COORDINATE WITH THE city prior to OROERINC THE UH STATION PACKAGES. 3. LIFT station is a CLASS 1. 0<VISX)N 2 LOCATION. support BRACKH float SWITCH CABLE k WEIGHT VALVE STEM EXTENSION 1 1/2* SCH. 40 C^LV. STEEL PIPE GUIDE RAILS 24’D A. MIN. FiBERCLASS/POLYETHYLENE BASIN STEM SUPPORT BRACKET GUIDE rail support BRACKET PUMP UFTlNG CHAIN POWER cable 1 1/A* BALL CHECK VALVE 1 1/4* NPT GATE VALVE I 1/4* npt CXSCHARGE coupling k REDUCER 1 1/2* HOPE SDR11 rORCC liAIN HYDRAULIC SEAUNG FIANCE 1 1/4* SCM 40 CALV. STEEL PIPE PUMP ANCHOR PUMP BASE BASE SLAB ANCHOR WEBBER HILLS scale in FEET m ORONO, MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS \139102\139102LS.DWG 6/30/98 FIGURE 3 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik d Associates Engineers & Architects COMM. 139102 WEBBER HILLS ORONO. MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FIGURE 2 Bonaatroo Rosena AndarKk A Aaaodataa COI IMnil. meeting JUN 2 8 1999 5" ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 The Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Charles Kelley, Richard Flint, Bob Sansevere, and Barbara Peterson. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gafifron, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Public Services Director Greg Gappa, Steve Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager, and Recorder Lanette Wolf. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (#1) ASSESSMENT HEARING - EDGEWOOD HILLS SEWER PROJECT A. ADOPT EDGEWOOD HILLS SEWER ASSESSMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 4301 Tom Kellogg gave an overview of the Edgewood Hills Sewer Project. The gravity sewer system will be aligned behind the homes and is acceptable to the residents. He said there will be some loss of trees. Gappa said the proposed assessment is $27,325 per unit and it will be a 100% assessed project. There are eight properties in the project. He said staff has had many discussions and meetings with the property owners. Mayor Jabbour opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. There were no public comments and the public hearing was closed. Gappa said tonight is the deadline for any homeowner to submit a written intent to file an appeal. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to approve Resolution No. 4301 Adopting the Edgewood Hills Area Sanitaiy Sewer Assessment Roll. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. B.AWARD CONTRACT FOR EDGEWOOD HELLS SEWER - RESOLUTION NO. 4302 Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to approve Resolution No. 4302 Awarding the Contract for the Installation of Sanitary Sewer Improvements in the Edgewood Hills Area. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#2) MAPLE PLAIN FIRE DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION - 1998 REPORT Dave Eisinger, Maple Plain Fire Chief, Troy Denneson, Assistant Chief, and Eugene Souser, Assistant Chief, were present. Denneson reviewed the Maple Plain Fire Department 1998 Report. He stated that approximately 10% of their calls for 1998 were in the Orono area. He said that calls for 1999 are approximately 15% higher than they were at this time in 1998. Page 1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (»2) MAPLE PI AIN FIRE DEPARTMENT PRESENTA TION - 1998 REPORT- Continued Souser stated that a new tanker truck will arrive this week. The cost of this truck was reduced by buying a used chassis. Eisinger said that at the end of 1999 or beginning of 2000, a committee will be working on the specifications for a new pumper to replace their 1973 FMC. They may have to include a ladder for the pumper due to the height of new homes in their service area. Jabbour asked if there is anything the City can do to help the Fire Department. Eisinger said the roof height at the edge of the roof should be limited to 25 feet. Some houses have a roof edge at 25 feet with the peak being at 35 to 40 feet. He said the longest ladder they have right now is 22 feet long. The new tanker will have a tandem axle. The present tanker is on a single axle, but it is fairly long. He said that because many of the driveways wind around through the trees, it is very difficult to access the houses with the single axle truck. The average house in their coverage area takes a minimum cf 1,200 gallons of water per minute to fight a fire and that requires a large size truck. Kelley asked the Chief for Ws recommendations on width of the roads and the dimensions of cul-de-sacs. Eisinger said the radius of the cul-de-sac should be no less than 45 to 50 feet. He said the road wddth should be a minimum of 20 to 25 feet. Jabbour said the length of driveways can also be a problem, Eisinger agreed and said that is one reason they carry large diameter hose. They have 1,200 feet of large diameter hose on each of their pumpers, 800 feet on the present tanker and there will be 800 feet on the new tanker. Kelley asked if they charge people for false fire alarms and how many false alarms they receive. Eisinger sfud they do not charge for false alarms in Maple Plain and Independence. He knows there is a false alarm ordinance in Orono, but he does not believe false alarms are a problem. Jabbour said he appreciates being kept informed. He would like to have a wo''k session with representatives of the three fire departments that serve Orono. He said the Council needs to be proactive and understand the needs of the fire departments to fight fires in the large structures that are being built in Orono. Sansevere asked how long it will take to get a new pumper. Page 2 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14, 1999 (#2) MAPLE PLAIN FIRE DEPARTMENT PRESENTA TION -1998 REPORT - Continued Eisinger said the process takes about two years. Sansevere asked if the current pumper can be outfitted with the type of ladder they need. Eifinger said the current pumper cannot be refurbished in that way because it is a single axle. It would require a double axle and a difierent type of chassis. Jabbour said he understood there was an ordinance prohibiting anytliing over 30 feet, but there are buildings over that. Eisinger said that Mound and Wayzata both have aerial units and they have mutual aid agreements with those cities. Kelley said that cooperation between the fire departments for the purchase of special equipment has to be looked at. Eisinger said that an aerial truck is very expensive and there are on-going expenses because it must be inspected frequently. Kelley asked Eisinger what kind of increases there have been in the operating budget. Eisinger said the operating budget will increase significantly because they are looking at increasing the hourly rate for the fire personnel. They will also need to replace some hand equipment such as hoses and nozzles. He said the 1999 operating budget is $119,000. He does not know how much it will go up for 2000. Sansevere asked what types of equipment could be donated to the department. Eisinger said that four of their gumby suits will need to be replaced. They also need nozzles. Jabbour asked if they could use an infrared camera. Eisinger said they would like a hand-held unit. He said they would like to obtain a Suburban type vehicle for in-house medical emergencies and for use as a secondary crash truck. Jabbour asked what the affect will be on their service to Orono if Townline Road is closed. Eisinger stated that for a couple of homes, response time will increase from approximately three or four minutes to eight or ten minutes. Jabbour asked if a fire hydrant would help. Page 3 \ ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (#2) MAPLE PLAIN FIRE DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION - 1998 REPORT- Continued Eisinger said the fire hydrant would have to be within 1,200 feet to be useful. He asked if the Council would like to continue having informal meetings with the Fire Department. Kelley said two informal meetings per year would be adequate. (#3) CONSENT AGENDA Items 7, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,26, 27, 28, 29, 31 and 32 were added to the Consent Agenda. Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (*#4) REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 24,1999 Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of May 24,1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS No comments. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS William Stoddard, Planning Commission Representative, had no comment. PUBLIC COMMENTS Jean Mork Bredeson said she is the contact person for the project at 2190 West Wayzata Boulevard. She said she is available to answer questions She thanked the Council for their help with the State of Miimesota. Page 4 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#5) KURT SCHMID, 160 GOLDEN VIEW ROAD - APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION Kurt Schmid was present. Mike Gaffron stated that City staff has denied Mr. Schmid’s request to relocate his driveway within five feet of the five-bedroom drainfield area. Septic System Inspector SteveWeckman displayed a map showing the location of the proposed house, driveway and septic system area. He said the request was denied for the following reasons; 1) the expansion area of the primary drainfield site would be destroyed in order to achieve proper drsdnage around the driveway, 2) no valid hardship exists, 3) approval of the request would limit the future potential of the property, and 4) approval would set a bad prec^ent. The City requires a five-bedroom septic site for any subdivision. Jabbour asked if Schmid wants to limit the house to four bedrooms. Schmid said it is currently a three-bedroom house with a potential fourth bedroom in the basement. He said there is no room to add a fifth bedroom. He wants to put in a turn-around driveway in fi"ont of the house that would come within approximately ten feet of the expansion area of the septic site. Jabbour said the 20-foot setbacks are unique to Orono. He thinks there should be a five- bedroom septic site set aside because it is a reasonable future use of the land, but he also thinks some of the setliiidc and septic system location requirements are extremely restrictive for people to be able to utilize a lot. Jabbour would rather grant a setback variance than abolish the future expansion area. Schmid said he is comfortable leaving the expansion area if he can change the setback to get a turnaround put in. He said there were only two possible building pads on this two-acre site and there wasn’t much he could do with the driv sway. Jabbour said he feels the City is pushing citizens to make the wrong decisions to get what they want. Weckman said that sometimes you can get proper drainage within ten feet, and sometimes you can’t. In this particular situation, it will be difficult to get proper drainage in the ten feet between the driveway and the septic site. Jabbour asked if the septic site could be moved closer to the lot line. Weckman said that the grade does not allow for movement of the septic site. Weckman said this was a difihcult site to develop because of the topography. Pages ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (#S) KURT SCHMID, 160 GOLDEN VIEW ROAD - APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION- Continued Schmid said he is okay with the 20-foot setback from the driveway to the comer, but he wants to put the turnaround driveway in front of the house and he can’t maintain a 20-foot setback in that area. Weckman asked if he could put the turnaround on the other side of the driveway. Schmid said he wants the turnaround in front of the house. If he puts it on the other side of the driveway, the topography drops off into a low area and he would have to bring in a lot of fiU. Wecknuin said the problem is that in the middle of the driveway, the level of the driveway and the level of the natural grade are about equal and there would be a point where it would be difiBcult to maintain the drainage away from the septic site. Gafifron asked if Schmid could install a curb that would direct the drainage from the driveway away from the system. Schmid said he could put in a curb on that side. Jabbour asked if staff would be comfortable if the applicant presented a plan where absolutely no additional drainage would come off the driveway and get into the setback. Sansevere asked how far the setback would be if the turnaround is in front of the house. Schmid said it is approxunately ten feet. Jabbour again asked if staff would be comfortable with that. Weckman said he would be comfortable with ten feet if there isn’t too much of an elevation difference. Jabbour said it would be helpful if staff would make decisions on administrative decisions without coming to the Council. Weckman said the best way to do that would be to change the code so uiat standards are applicable. He said the code has to be revised within the next sue months anyway. Kelley said this is unique because it is a brand new house and the applicant should have known that he wanted a circle driveway and that he needed a 20-foot setback from the septic site. Jabbour agreed with Kelley and said he is very un^mpathetic with the applicant, but he feels this ordinance was created when there wasn’t enough data and it should changed. He feels Pate6 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (»5) KURT SCHMID, 160 GOLDEN VIEW ROAD - APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION - Continued the applicant will do irreparable damage by limiting the lot to a four-bedroom house, but it would be okay if staff is comfortable with it and could work it out with the applicant. Weckman said the main reason this item is before the Council is that it is a new house and the applicant wants to place the driveway in the required setback. He does not feel staff has the authority to approve ten feet for one person and 20 feet for another person. The City Code requires a 20-foot setback and he feels that standard should be maintained. If the Council chooses to change the rules, that ’s fine, but he believes it sets a bad precedent to issue this type of variance for a new house without any hardship. Jabbour said the code should be changed because the consequences of the code are negative to the ultimate goal. Weckman said the code needs to be revised because of recent changes to the septic code by the State of Minnesota. Peterson asked if there is a hardship in this case. Jabbour s.’^id no. Schmid said he wanted a circular driveway from the beginning, but the surveyor couldn’t put it on the plan because of the setback requirements. Jabbour said he agrees with staff that it would be a bad precedent for the Council to grant the variance with the lack of a hardship, but the Council should review the code if it no longer makes sense. Peterson moved, Jabbour seconded, a motion to support staff's decision regarding the septic site requirement at 160 Golden View Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (•#6) #132 ORONO SCHOOLS, 800 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH - EXTINGUISH CITY EASEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 4303 Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve Resolution No. 4303 authorizing the appropriate City representatives to jign the documents extinguishing the City ’s easement rights over Outlot A, Orono School Expansion per the terms of the Developers Agreement dated November 28,1998. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Pi^e7 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (*#7) #2169 MICHAEL RENARD, 1185 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4304 Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve Resolution No. 4304 Granting Variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) at 1185 Tonkawa Road, Application #2169. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#8) #2447 KIRT WOODHOUSE, 885 FERNDALE ROAD WEST - VARIANCE Kirt Woodhouse and Bruce Knudson were present. Knudson said that a variance was granted in January of 1999 for remodeling of the house at 885 Femdale Road. After the bidding process for the remodeling, it was recommended that the entire house be removed because of the structural changes that are necessary. He said the existing foundation is adequate to construct a new structure. They would like to remove the house down to the foundation and rebuild it so it can meet code. Gaffron said approximately 50% of the foundation of the house is crawl space or slab on grade. The building inspectors will not be able to determine if the existing foundation is useful until it is excavated. The entire house is located within the 75’ setback. Jabbour asked if the applicant is proceeding under the assumption that the existing foundation is adequate to support the new house. Knudson said that part of the house has a full basement, which is exposed, and another portion of the house has a crawl space. A third portion of the house is slab on grade. It will not be possible to determine the condition of the foundation until the house has been removed. Woodhouse said that the portion of the house located on the slab on grade was propo. to be removed under the original variance. Jabbour asked if they are confident about the foundation up to the slab on grade. Knudson said yes. Knudson said the staff report states the foundation will not be modified. It will be modified because it will go from a slab on grade to wood beam-support floor. They will have to remove the top two courses of die foundation. Gaffron asked the age of the house where they will keep the existing foundation. Schmid said the house was built in 1940, Gaffron said that then the foundation is approximately 60 years old. Pages i ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (U8) 82447KIRT WOODHOVSE, 885 FERNDALEROAD WEST- VARIANCE- Continued Jabbour asked if the applicant would feel comfortable if the Council considered approving the application based on the former approval providing that if they remove more than three courses of the foundation, the applicant would have to submit a new application. Knudson asked if the Mayor means that if they remove the house and have to lemove more than three courses of the foundation for some reason, that they would have to relocate the house. Jabbour said that is correct. Woodhouse said that the amount of hardcover is being reduced from what was granted in the original variance. Gaffron asked the applicant if he would build a different house if he had to start all over. Woodhouse said that because of the topography, if the house is moved back on the lot, he would have to build a very large house to be able see the lake. He said the original variance was granted because everyone, including his next door neighbor, thought it was best to keep the house right where it is. In the original variance, he was trying to save the center portion of the house which he can still do, but now that he has done more research, it has become apparent that that portion of the house has enough flaws that it would not make sense to save it. He said he will do that if that is the only alternative, but he would have less insulation than he would like and the whole building envelope would not be what it should be. Woodhouse said that the hardcover will be reduced with this proposal. Sansevere asked Woodhouse how much of the foundation is inadequate. Woodhouse said he thinks it is all adequate. He said that his design team feels the vast majority of the foundation is adequate to build on. He does not want to get into a situation where he would have to relocate the whole house if he has to go lower than three courses of block in one area. Kelley said he feels the house should be relocated because the project meets the substantial takedown requirement and it is located right on the lot line on the east side. Woodhouse said he is moving the house off the property line. Kelley said this is the time to clean up this piece of property. He sud he is not suggesting that the whole house be moved back inside the building envelope. Jabbour asked if Kelley feels the side setback should be improved. Page 9 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (»8) U2447KIRT WOODHOVSE, 885 FERNDALEROAD WEST- VARIANCE- Continued Kelley said the lakeshore setback could also be improved. Peterson agreed with Kelley, but she said that the topography prohibits moving the house. Woodhouse said that moving the house would take three mature trees. Sansevere asked if the reason Woodhouse didn ’t want to move the house was to save the three tree,s. Woodhouse said if he moved the house back, he would have to build a house that would be much taller in order to capture the views. He said the only buildable area on the lot is where the house is situated. His neighbor ’s house is equally close. Sansevere said he agrees with Mayor Jabbour that they must use most of the existing foundation. Woodhouse said as far as he knows it is all usable. Jabbour said if the Council decides to gram the variance, there must be strong direction for staff. He said he is in favor of allowing the house to be tom down with the understanding that if it requires replacement of more than three courses of foundation for structural purposes, Woodhouse must file a new application with the City. Knudson said the proposal is to move part of the iiouse back and remove part of the hardcover. He said tills restriction will not allow them to do that. Jabbour asked if they were planning to move the house back. Knudson displayed a drawing that showed the house plan. He said that right now, there is a straight facade on the lake side ai.d by eliminating some square footage in the house and sliding the house back, they eliminate hardcover and pull the house away from the lake. Woodhouse explained the areas of hardcover on the plan that were approved in the original variance that now be eliminated. Knudson explained which parts of the foundation they would use. Jabbour asked about the height of the roof. Knudson explained the elevation of the house. Page 10 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (#8) 82447 KIRT WOODHOVSE, 885 FERNDALEROAD WEST- VARIANCE- Continued Woodhouse said this plan results in less mass for the house. Gaffron asked for specific direction on the number of courses of foundation the applicant will be allowed to remove before they will be ordered to stop work. Jabbour said if he has to remove more than three courses for structural purposes, not for lowering the building, other than the area that he is totally eliminating, he will have to make a new application. He said the mass and height of the building must not exceed what is being proposed because this is different than the original application. Flint said this proposal is better than the previous proposal. Kelley asked what the definition is of a substantial taking of a house. He thinks more than 80% of the value of the home is being replaced. He feels that a substantial taking is anything over the majority and that's what this is. Gafifon said there is no threshold defined for when it changes from a remodel to replacement. Kelley said there is substantial haiUship because of the topography of the lot. He just doesn't want to see applicants ask for multiple variances. Jabbour moved, Sansevere seconded, a motion, based on the present proposal, that complete removal of the house meets the intent of the approval grant^ in the resolution adopted by the Council on January 15,1999 with the understanding that if more than three courses of foundation, except for the area where the applicant wishes to set the house further away from the lake, are replaced for structural purposes, that the applicant will file a new Land Use Application to relocate the house and the Building Inspector will not allow any further work. Kelley asked what happens if it is the footings that cannot support the weight and must be replaced, but not the wall. Jabbour said they would have to make a new application. He pointed out to the applicant that he is taking a risk by proceeding based on the Council's action. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1. (Kelley objected.) Page 11 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (#9) #2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH -FmAL PLAT APPROVAL Thomas Crosby was present. Gaflfron said that Spring Hill Golf Club is requesting final plat approval. He said this plat was primarily for the purpose of creating easements over the wetlands and drainage ways of the property. It also resulted in the creation of two outlots. He said the outlots contain mostly wetland areas which have now been delineated and are shown on the plat. Regarding the trail issue, he asked for direction fi-om the Council in reviewing the language of the preliminary plat resolution that has been revised. He asked the Council to review the wording of items 1,2 and 8 on page 4 of 6. He noted that the final plat resolution states that all requirements of the trail agreement must be completed. Crosby said that the land south of the plat will be subjected to the conservation easement. He asked if Gaflfron has seen the wetland delineation on that portion of the land. Gafiron said he has not seen it. Crosby said that the City will need the wetland delineation on the separation parcel to attach to the conservation easement. Gafifron said the City would need the description of it. Crosby said the trail has been constructed along Spring Hill. It goes across Co. Rd. 6 and then north on Tamarack where it has been constructed from the intersection to the maintenance shed. It then goes to wetland #12 and it has not been construct^ north of the wetland where Spring Hill would give the City a ten-foot easement. Crosby said that he had hoped that for the portions of the trail that had been constructed and accepted, that the en^e tr^ would have been delineated as a two-foot strip either side of the center line. He said he is concerned about the legal description of the trail because it says everything south of the northerly element of the shaded area is for use for a trail. He said that if the ten feet is not all bemg used, a number of years fi^om now someone could try to move the trail. He ^d that when this project was started, they said they would create a tr^ mutually agreeable within the ten feet next to the right-of-way. He said the trail agreement is a separate document, not on the plat. The way the trail agreement has been drafted is that the legal descripUon of the trail is an exhibit, so that the language of the trail agreement is really t^g the agreement they used at the time of the conditional use permit, throwing out the portions that are no longer relevant and putting it into an easement. He said it is the legal essentials out of a broader, pnor agreement. Barrett said that is the document Crosby provided. Page 12 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (»9) U2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH A VENUE NORTH -FINAL PLA T APPROVAL - Continued Crosby said he would prefer to have a legal description for the trail as it presently exists. He said he has provided language for the difficult portion of the trail south of the maintenance shed and they would give the City ten feet north of the wetland. Jabbour complimented Mr. Crosby on the project. He said there is really only one outstanding issue and that is the trail. He said the trail is not finished and there are other issues with the trail. He said that the area on the north side of Co. Rd. 6 is a very difficult area to build a trail, but that is what was presented by the project manager. He said that the Council members went on a tour of the trail and there is work that must be done to the trail. Flint said then j are substantial problems with the trail and he is frustrated that nothing is getting done. He itemized the following issues: 1. On the south end, there is supposed to be a gate to get to the trail that has not been installed. 2. There is a point on the trail where it falls off to the side and it is very dangerous. It needs to be built up on one side or cut down on the other side. 3. Up towards Co. Rd. 6, there was an agreement to move the fence over because it is too close to a tree and that has not been done. 4. At the intersection of Co. Rd. 6 and 4, Spring Hill wanted the trail as close as possible to the intersection. Tim Johnson had suggested building a terrace so that it would not be necessary to build the trail at the top of the hill, but part way down. The terrace has not been built and now Spring Hill’s position is that it ^1 be very expensive to build the trail at that point and that it should be built on the County rigjit-of-way, but then it’s the City’s problem to get the County’s approval. 5. Where the trail heads north on Tamarack, nothing has been completed. 6. The trail was supposed to be built to the south of wetland U12, which Tim Johnson agreed to, and it has not been built. Flint said he would prefer to stay with the old trail agreement until all the issues are resolved and the trail is completed. He recommended that this matter be tabled for two weeks to try to get the work done. The prior agreement was that the trail would be built and open at the same time as the golf course. Crosby asked if Tim Johnson was the individual that most of the discussions were with. Flint said Johnson was at each of the field inspections. Crosby said they are very conscious that the trail should open at the same time as the golf course. He said the course is scheduled to open on June 25. He asked if the City wants the area on 6th Avenue North built out. Flint said yes. Past 13 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (U9) #2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH-FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - Continued Jabbour said at the time Spring Hill made its application, he had suggested that if Spring Hill did not want to give the City the trail, he would vote for the application without the trail. Now, there is a legal document between the City and Spring Hill and it is his fiduciary responsibility to the City to see that the terms of the agreement are met. He said the original idea was to use Spring Hill’s tunnel to cross Co. Rd. 6. That idea has been abandoned so the crossing must be on Co. Rd. 6. He suggested that representatives from the Council, City staff and the golf course meet at the site and review the issues so that Spring Hill knows what needs to be done. Flint said he doesn’t think knowing what needs to be done is the issue. He believes Tim Johnson knows exactly what needs to be done and that he could finish it in two weeks. He said the difficult issue is building the trail in the County right-of-way. Crosby said he understands that the County will not allow the trail to be built on their right-of- way because of the dangerous crossing. Gappa said he met with the County and they refused to discuss building the trail on their right- of-way. Flint said there are two ways to deal with that issue. One way is to build the trail on Spring Hill’s property, but that leaves a segment with the question of how you get across the County property. The oti.er way is to do it the long way, by getting the County to approve it. Crosby said that Spring Hill could post a bond where the City has discretion to go forward if it’s not done on an acceptable basis within a period of time. He agreed that there should be a meeting with the golf course management where Crosby is present. He does not want to build something that is unsightly or dangerous if there is a possibility of the County giving permission to build the tr^ on its right-of-way. Sansevere asked if Spring Hill could revisit using a part of the cart path to cross Co. Rd. 6. Crosby said Spring Hill objects to using the tunnel to cross Co. Rd. 6 because it is not constructed for use in the winter and in the summer, it would ’./2 right in the middle of the golf course. Jabbour said it is too late to use the tunnel because the tunnel is already built and the size of the tunnel does not lend itself to being divided for public and private use. Crosby would like to arrange a meeting. He said that Spring Hill has announced to its membership that they are going to open in late June. He would like to see if through bonding or some other means they could preserve the opening date. He thinks most of the work can be Page 14 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (U9) U2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH-FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - Continued completed quickly. He questioned the request to put the trail in up to the wetland. He understood that it was to be completed up to the maintenance facility. Flint said the contract provides that the trail will be put in up to the wetland. Crosby agreed, but he thought that subsequent discussions had it only going to the driveway. Flint said that is Tim Johnson’s side of the discussion, but the City said no, build it to the wetland. He said that on the description of the easement, he wants it left as a ten-foot easement. He said the agreement provides for a four-foot trail. If the easement is defined as the middle of the four-foot trail, it would be virtually impossible for anyone to maintain the trail because you need room on either side. Crosby said he would not have a problem with saying two feet, together with the maintenance. He said the issue is for a subsequent Council that looks at this thinking they have all this space and then want to reroute the trail. Flint said the trail has already been moved because the original plan for the trail that the City had was to go on the golf course side of the wetland in the area of East Long Lake Road and Spring Hill Road. There was great concern about that by the golf course because of safety reasons. The City backed off to the point of taking the ten-foot easement along the edge and having a little flexibility for the trail. He wants to stay with the original agreement. Barrett asked if there should be two descriptions, one of the easement and one of the trail. Flint thought the agreement contemplated that the easement would be ten feet except where the trail actually goes further. Crosby said that is what the legal description says. Jabbour said the original agreement was for a ten-foot easement to run parallel to the property line. When the City staff and the golf course staff visited the site, they could see that there was a natural direction for the trail that would preserve trees which was beyond the ten feet. He asked if they were saying that in that area, they do not want the City to have the ten feet that they are not using plus all the area beyond the ten feet because at some places it could be as wide as 30 feet. He asked if Crosby would rather describe the easement based on the existing trail plus two feet on each side it. Crosby said that in the area where the trail has not been constructed, he would describe the center line, give two feet on each side of the center line and some additional area for maintenance rights. He said the reason for that is to avoid someone coming in at a later date Page 15 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (#9) #2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SDCTH AVENUE NORTH-FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - Continued and saying the tr^ has been in one spot for ten years, now let’s move it in five feet within the ten-foot easement. Jabbour suggested that they try to figure out if the Council could work something out so the golf course could meet their deadline for opening and that the trail issues need to be resolved outside of the Council meeting. Crosby suggested that they try to get as much as possible done by June 25 and to the extent there are open issues, get a bond from Spring Hill. Sansevere asked if there are other issues that need to be addressed to get the course open on time. Ct ojby said no. Jabbout said they cannot open without a certificate of occupancy and the City cannot issue the certificate. Sansevere asked staff, with the current condition of the trail, what would be a realistic amount of time to expect it to be completed to the Council’s satisfaction. Crosby said the only part that would be difficult to complete is the part on the north side of Co. Rd. 6. Kelley asked if it would have to be bonded, would the City Engineer spec out what it would cost if the City had to complete the project. Jabbour said yes and the City would ask for 150% of the costs. He said the Council should consider not building some of the trail in lieu of the City having the right to build it in the future and the funds be deposited with the Park Commission. Flint wants to stay wth the existing trail agreement. Crosby said that the existing trail agreement is not a document that can be filed. It doesn’t have legal descriptions or notarizations and it has provisions that have fallen by the wayside. He said it was not his intention to change the agreement, only to take out language that isn’t necessary. Crosby he wants the language regarding an opaque fence from the existing Conditional Use Permit to be used in the trail agreement. Flint said he would agree if the fence will allow the free movement of animals. Page 16 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (U9) #2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH A VENUE NORTH -FINAL PLA T APPROVAL - Continued Crosby said he will leave that language in. Crosby brought up the issue of liability. He asked if the City has indemnified land owners from responsibility for trails granted. Flint said the City has not indemnified land owners for any liability that might occur. The City has told land owners that if it would give them comfort, the City would accept the fee interest in the land rather than an easement. The choice has been left up to the land owner. Crosby said that was his understanding, but if the City has indemnified them in other cases, he would ask for it. Crosby said he understands that all issues have been resolved except for the trail. Crosby asked if, assuming the City and the golf course do reach agreement and assuming there is an acceptable bonding arrangement to the extent needed, does the City Council have the resolutions needed to permit the opening to go forward. Jabbour said they would ask the City Administrator to poll the Council based on the language agreed to and they could probably accept that. Crosby said he doesn’t want to get into a position where someone thinks of something later on and there is a legal impediment to opening the course. Barrett said there is an occupancy certificate needed for the buildings only. Gaftron said he talked with the building inspectors today and neither one of them had authorized issuance of the occupancy certificate. There has been a final inspection and there is a short punch list of things to do. Barrett said that the Conditional Use Permit itself requires that the applicant shall work with the City in establishing trails to be dedicated as described in Exhibit D. He said the Council talked about the bonding situation being acceptable to the City as a resolution of that, and then the CUP is met. The final question is whether or not the plat must be filed first. Crosby said there is a mechanical problem with filing the plat because Medina has to sign off on the plat. Jabbour said he believes Spring Hill has done everything they said they would do except complete the trail. He said if a legal mechanism can be found under which the City is assured of the completion of the trail, the Council would agree to issuing the certificate of occupancy. He asked if the other Council members agreed. They said yes. He said that assuming the building inspector and other City staff give their permission, the Council is willing to delay that part of the agreement which gives the City the right for the trail to be constructed prior to issuance of the occupancy certificate with the understanding we are going to get it and the due diligence that we have to do to make sure we are going to get it. So the minute my Paget? ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (»9) U2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CL UB, 725 SIXTH A VENUE NORTH -FINAL PLA T APPROVAL - Continued understanding that the Council is comfortable, the minute we have that in hand, that you, from our point of view, could be issued a certificate of occupancy and a conditional use permit. His feeling is that there should be a meeting and Crosby could prepare some modification to the document based on tonight’s discussion. Crosby asked if there were any other specific concerns. Jabbour asked if the light on the equipment shed had been fixed. Gappa said there was some concern about the light spillage from the maintenance shed. Crosby reviewed the issues with the trail. Flint moved, Kelly seconded, a motion to table the Plat of Spring Hill Golf Club File No. 2480. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#10) #2484 WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WOODHILL ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4305 Kelley removed himself for this item. Jabbour said a revised resolution has been drafted for the Conditional Use Permit. The resolution must be reviewed to see if it reflects the understanding reached on May 24. Bruce Malkerson, 901 Marquette, referred to page 6 of the revised resolution, paragraph 7. He asked that the words “and they shall be completed before opening of the access” be added to the first sentence. Under 7.B., the 10 MPH speed limit signs should also be on Woodhill Avenue. Under 7.D,. he said they understood there would be two sets of speed bumps on Woodhill Avenue. The way the language is drafted, speed bumps do not have to be installed. Under 7.C., they want uniform traffic signs for the ‘Do Not Enter ” sign on the public right-of- way. Jabbour said he did not understand that there would be speed bumps on Woodhill Avenue. Sansevere said it was his understanding that speed bumps would be put on Woodhill Avenue. Jabbour said the whole thing is Woodhill Avenue, but he understood the only place they were going to put speed bumps is in the area they are building, not in the existing street. Malkerson said that was not his understanding. Page 18 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (niO) #2484 WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WOODHILL ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Continued Jabbour said that speed bumps prohibit snow removal and he does not believe the Public Services Director is in favor of them. Jim McCarthy, representing Woodhill Golf Course, said he talked about a grammatical change to paragraph 12 with Barrett and Gaflfron. He distributed a copy of the change. His understanding of the 10 MPH speed limit was that it would be on the access area from the stop sign up to the maintenance building. It was not his understanding that the speed limit would be changed on the public street. He said they would leave the location of the speed bumps up to the Public Service Director. He agrees with placing the “Do Not Enter” sign on the street. He said that with the slight modification of a couple of words on paragraph 12, the items can be worked through with staff and Mr. Barrett. Jabbour asked if Mr. Malkerson had a chance to look at the modification to paragraph 12. Malkerson said he just received it Barrett said he would not recommend that the City at this point or in its previous hearing found as a fact that the acceptance of this was not a waiver or without prejudice. He said the City was going to do this vnthout reference to it’s legal impact. He believes the Council could accept the language provided that it reads “the applicant asserts that its agreement to the conditions is met.” Jabbour stud this is a two-fold issue. This is our resolution, this is what we were going to do whether or not there was a lawsuit. He said hopefially Woodhill will find the wisdom to drop the lawsuit, but if they don’t want to drop the lawsuit, that is their privilege. He believes the Council is acting reasonably and within its authority. He asked if this document has to be a settlement of the lawsuit because he never proceeded that way. Barrett said it does not, it simply states that they wish to reserve, they assert that they are by accepting it still preserving their position and it states that the City would, if they wish, dismiss without prejudice which is what he understood to be the intent of the Council from the hearing four weeks ago. Jabbour asked if Barrett had a problem with the change. Barrett said he would accept the proposal, but adding the word “asserts”. Jabbour asked if Jackson would agree to using the word “asserts”. Jackson said he agreed. Pi^e 19 I ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (#10) #2484 WOODHUL COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WOODHILL ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Continued Moorse said that the issue of Woodhili Avenue having a 10 MPH speed limit is different from what he had understood. Sansevere said that wasn ’t his understanding either. Moorse said he does not know if the City has the authority to change the speed limit on the street. Gappa said the City does not have the authority to change the speed limit from 30 MPH. Jabbour explained that the City would have to ask the State for permission to lower the speed limit. The State would conduct a speed survey and change the speed limit accordingly. If the majority of the vehicles are traveling faster than 30 MPH, there is a possibility the State would raise the speed limit, not lower it. Sansevere said the speed bumps will keep the speed closer to 10 MPH. Jabbour asked if Malkerson wants the City to ask the State to lower the speed limit. Malkerson asked if there will be speed bumps. Sansevere, Peterson and Flint said it was their understanding there would be speed bumps on Woodhili Avenue. Malkerson said they would not request the 10 MPH speed limit if there are two speed bumps on Woodhili Avenue. Moorse asked for clarification of the speed bumps. Jabbour said there should be two speed bumps on the existing paved road. Barrett said these items, including the speed bumps, shall be completed before the road is opened. Gappa asked for clarification of who will pay for and maintmn the speed bumps. Jabbour said the Club will pay for them. Gappa said they will need to put warning signs up at each one and have them painted and maintained with yellow paint. Page 20 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (#10) #2484 WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB, 200 fVOODHJLL ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Continued Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4305 Granting a Conditional Use Permit to Woodhill Country Club for a Driveway Access to Woodhill Avenue, File No. 28484, as amended. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (5 Minute Recess) (*#11) EXTEND ADULT USE MORATORIUM - ORDINANCE NO. 189,2nd Series Peterson moved, Kelley seconded a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 189, Second Series, Extending an Interim Moratorium on the Granting of Building Permits, Land Subdivisions, Rezoning Applications, Conditional or Special Use Permits, Variances, or Other Authority Relating to Adult Uses in All Commercial and Industrial Districts in the City of Orono. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#12) EXTEND SERVICE 800 ACCESS AGREEMENT DEADLINES - ACCESS DISCUSSION Peterson moved, Kelley seconded a motion to approve extending the deadline for Mn/DOT reconveyance approval to July 31,1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Jabbour said the Council had been mislead to think they had anything to say about the closing of Townline Road. He said it became apparent during a recent meeting with the other cities and Mn/DOT that Orono’s suggestions would not be considered by Mn/DOT. Jabbour said he asked Tom 0*Keefe if he would advocate Orono’s position and O’Keefe said he would not. Mn/DOT is going to close the road. He said the only way to keep Townline Road open is to petition for County Road 19 to move to Townline Road. Jabbour said he would still like to have a joint meeting with Independence and asked Moorse to contact them. If Independence does not want to meet, staff should send a letter to the residents of Orono and Independence telling them what happened. Orono has three options; 1) petition to move County Road 19 to Townline Road, 2) cul-de-sac the road on Orono’s side, or 3) close it. Jabbour said that the City Administrator has given the Fairview Covenant Church until tomorrow to come up with a signed purchase agreement. The City Administrator is planning to start the 90 day quick-take process on Wednesday morning if the signed purchase agreement is not received. The City will vacate the alley. At the Park tour, the Council decided that they are going to direct staff not to spend the money on trees at Seven Nations Park. Kelley moved, Sansevere seconded, a motion to reconsider spending money for trees at Seven Nations Park. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1. (Flint objected) Page 21 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT- Continued Kelley asked staff for an update on Femdale Road North. Kellogg said that the utilities will be done in a few days. He said that by the end of this week they ^\dll start subcutting the road and put the base in for the street. They will start on the south end by the bridge and work north a little bit at a time. The completion date is in September. Kelley asked about the width of County Road 15. Gappa said the north side will be cut back. Kelley asked if the storm sewers go into the wetland with no filtering. Gappa said that some of them do and that's why they did the payment in lieu of the ponding. He said the drainage has always gone off the road into the wetland. Kelley asked if the wetlands will be restored. Gappa said they will have to restore the wetlands. Kelley asked about the time frame for the project. Gappa said it is supposed to be finished by the end of the season. He said they have had major problems with the surcharging and settling. Kelley asked staff to check the intersection of County Road 6 and McCully because it is very poorly signed and reflected. He said it is very difficult to drive in that area at night. Gappa said that the residents in that area have complained and asked for street lights. Sansevere asked if it would be feasible to look into the City putting a tunnel under Co. Rd. 6 for the trail. Jabbour suggested taking money in lieu of doing the trail on the other side of Co. Rd. 6. Jabbour said he has had complaints from citizens that things aren't getting done. He said there is a lack of staff, but he doesn't want situations to drag on for months. He believes the Council must deal with citizens in a straight forward manner and not negotiate matters indefinitely. Flint asked about the City of Medina's request for Orono input regarding additional sewered development in the Medina Momingside area. He likes staff*s suggestion regarding a buffer strip. Page 22 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT- Continued Jabbour said he does not want to act on this request until the outcome of Townline Road is known. He asked that a letter be sent to Medina informing them that the City will not be able to make a determination about the availability of additional sewer units until the plans for the replacement of the current sewer trunk line as part of the Highway 12 upgrade project are completed. ENGINEER REPORT (#13) SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING FOR FOX RIDGE SANITARY SEWER PROJECT A. ORDER PREPARATION OF REPORT FOR FOX RIDGE SEWER - RESOLUTION NO. 4306 Kelley asked if the sewer will be located underneath the bridge at the Luce Line. Gappa said it will go underground under the Luce Line with directional boring. Kellogg said it is a small diameter pipe. Kelley said staff should not be shortsighted and put in too small a pipe. He said staff should considot whether the pipe should be run all the way down Brown Road in the future. Kelley asked about the Webber Hills project. Kellogg said the Webber Hills project will be independent of the Fox Ridge project. Kelley said he just wants to make sure the right size pipes are used in the right spots to allow f or future expansion. Jabbour said it would be helpful for staff to present a grid showing how areas will be sewered and also showing a 25 or SO year grid showing the size of the pipe. He said that the Long Lake and Orono sewer systems should be looked at to see if they could be integrated. Moorse said staff has been working with Long Lake*s consultant engineer to put together a scope of services to see if there are some efficiencies that can be put in place. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, a motion approving Resolution No. 4306 Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Report for the Installation of Municipal Sanitary Sewer to Serve the Fox Ridge Area. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. B. RECEIVE REPORT AND SCHEDULE HEARING FOR FOX RIDGE SEWER, RESOLUTION NO. 4307 Page 23 r- ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (#13) SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING FOR FOX RIDGE SANITARY SEWER PROJECT - Continued Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, a motion approving Resolution No. 4307 Receiving Report and Calling Hearing on Fox Ridge Sanitary Sewer Improvement. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#14) APPROVE PURCHASE OF LAWN MOWERS FOR GOLF COURSE Flint said he is concerned because there are requests for equipment from the golf course and there are separate requests for equipment from the City. Gappa said the park mowing has been contracted out for several years and the golf course is a separate operation and do their own mowing. The City maintenance people do roadside mowing. Flint would like all the City public works coordinated. Gappa said a different type of mower is necessary for the fairways at the golf course. Flint moved, Peterson seconded, a motion approving the purchase of a TORO Groundmaster 223-D rough mower from MTI Distributing, Plymouth MN for $15,921.00. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Flint moved, Peterson seconded, a motion approving the purchase of a TORO Reelmaster 5200 fairway mower from MTI Distributing, Plymouth MN for $22,960.34. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Flint moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to amend the 1999 Golf Coune Capital Outlay Budget to delete the maintenance shed addition and approve the purchase of a rough mower and a faiiway mower. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#15) APPROVE PURCHASE OF PUBLIC WORKS TRUCK Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the purchase of Public Works replacement dump/plow truck from Boyer Ford with accessories from J-Crafit at a total cost of $73,415.00 to be funded from the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund budget with a budget adjustment of $73,415.00. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#16) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #3 - LIFT STATION #13 REHABILITATION Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve Request for Payment #3, to GHT construction, Delano, MN in the amount of $4,037.88. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 24 ii '4 ♦ ’J ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (*#17) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #8 - NAVARRE WATER TREATMENT PLANT REHABILITATION Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve Request for Payment #8, to Shank Constructors, Brooklyn Park, MN in the amount of $28,193.00. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#18) APPROVE PURCHASE OF FUEL SYSTEM Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to award the bid for the fuel dispensing system to Griggs Contracting, Shoreview, MN in the amount of $5,620.00, including sales tax; to be funded from the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund and to amend the budget by $5,620.00. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (*#19) TAX FORFEIT PARCEL, 1025 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - RESOLUTION NO. 4308 Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve Resolution No. 4308 to Release Tax Forfeited Land at 1025 Brown Road South for Private Sale to Adjacent Owners. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#20) SUBREGIONAL HOUSING EFFORTS Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion indicating the City’s support for, and participation on, a lake area housing subcommittee to determine how cooperative efforts can best be used to address lake area housing needs. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#21) FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENT - ORDINANCE NO. 190,2ND SERIES Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve Ordinance No. 190,2nd Series, Amending Ordinance No. 181,2nd Series, an Ordinance Adopting the 195^ Fee Schedule. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#22) RESIGNATION OF CAROL HANSING, PART-TIME CLERICAL - POLICE DEPARTMENT Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve Carol Hansing ’s resignation from her position as a part-time police clerk. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 25 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (*#23) RESIGNATION OF STEVE WECKMAN, ON-SITE SYSTEMS MANAGER - RESOLUTION NO. 4309 Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the resignation of Steve Weckman from his position as On-Site Septic Manager effective June 18,1999, and to adopt Resolution No. 4309 recognizing Steve for hb 9 years of dedicated service to the City. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#24) APPOINTMENT OF DON PALMETEER TO TEMPORARY BUILDING INSPECTOR POSITION Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the appointment of Don Palmateer, Jr. to the temporary Building Inspector position at the Level 7, Step 1 pay rate of S16.00 per hour effective June 15,1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#25) APPOINTMENT OF KRISTINE JENSON TO ASSISTANT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR POSITION Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the appointment of Kristine Jenson to the position of Assbtant Zoning Adminbtrator/Planner at the Level 6, Step 2 salary of $32,629.00, effective June 15,1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#26) APPOINTMENT OF ADRIENNE MADSON TO PART-TIME POLICE RECORDS CLERK POSITION Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the appointment of Adrienne Madson to the position of Part-Time Police Records Clerk at a pay rate of $10.54 per hour, in the Level 3 part-time position pay range, effective June 7,1999; and to authorize the payment of the $1,000 fee to the temporary employment agency. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#27) APPOINTMENT OF WENDY BOTTENBERG TO ZONING INTERN POSITION Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the appointment of Wendy Bottenberg to a six-month Zoning Intern position at a rate of $10.00 per hour. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#28) PROMOTION OF PAUL WEINBERGER TO ZONING ADMINISTRATOR/PLANNER lU POSITION Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the promotion of Paul Weinberger to the position of Zoning Administrator/Planner ED, at the Level 9, Step 2 pay rate of $40,920.00, effective June 14,1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 26 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (*#29) ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ENABLE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS TO REMEDY HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUES ON PROPERTY - ORDINANCE NO. 191, 2ND SERIES Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve Ordinance No. 191, Second Series, an Ordinance Amending Orono Municipal Code Section 9.55 Maintenance of Private Property to Include Provisions to Allow the use of Special Assessments to Recover Costs Relating to the Correction of Violations to this Code Section. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#30) DNR INTEREST IN TAX FORFEIT PARCEL ADJACENT TO WOOD-RILL SNA Kelley said he is in favor of releasing the parcel to the DNR. Moorse said the DNR plans to restore the parcel to presettlement conditions. He asked if the Council wanted to put any conditions on releasing the parcel. He said that staff considered a condition of not allowng an access of from Highway 12. Barrett said that the City may not be able to put :uiy conditions on it. Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, a motion to direct the City Administrator to prepare a resolution releasing a tax forfeit parcel adjacent to the Wood-Rill SNA to the DNR. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#31) AMENDMENT TO COMPENSATION POLICY Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve an amendment to Section 318. Severance of the City's Administrative Policy to provide that all regular employees with a minimum of three years of service who resign in good standing shall receive payment of accrued vacation to a maximum of 240 hours, and one-third of their accumulated sick leave as severance pay. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#32) REQUEST FOR REPLACEMENT OF MICROFICHE READER/PRINTER Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the purchase of a Bell and Howell ABR 2000 Bond Reader/Printer at a cost of $2,913.00, and to amend the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund budget to reflect the expenditure. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT Page 27 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 (*#33) UCENSES Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the following licenses: Garbage & Refuse Collector's License: Frank Blackowiak Blackowiak & Son Sanitation & Rolloff Service 1155 Sunnyfield Road North Mound, MN 55364 VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0, (*#34) BILLS Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Jabbour said that there are some residents from Mound that want to talk to the Council regarding a community center. They wiU be included on a work session agenda. Moorse told the Council that the June 16 work session has been cancelled and there will be a tour of townhouses in Plymouth, Wayzata, Minnetonka, and Tonka Bay on June 24th. ADJOURNMENT Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to adjourn the meeting at 11:00 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 28 TO; FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator 7 June 25,1999 COUNCIL MEETING JUN 2 6 1999 Cn Y SUBJECT; LMCD Year 2000 Budget and Levy As part of her monthly LMCD report, Lili McMillan will review the LMCD's Year 2000 budget and levy. The City of Orono's share of the levy for the Year 2000 is $32,998.54. This is a $6,537.14 or 24.7% increase over the 1999 levy. The main reason for this increase is that in 1999 the LMCD used $15,000 of Administrative Fund reserves and $30,000 of Exotics Management Fund reserves to reduce the levy. For the Year 2000, there are no reserves being used from the Administrative Fund and $10,000 of reserves being used from the Exotics Management Fund. DRAFT f I' 'f LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2000 BUDGET AND LEVY (draft) .•fiPiillll sm City OEEPHAVEN EXCELSIOR GREENWOOD MINNETONKA MTKA BEACH MINNETRiSTA MOUND ORONO 8HOREWOOD SPRING PARK TONKA BAY VICTORIA WAYZATA WOODLAND 1997 Population EsSmates Taxable Market Value Net Tax % of Total Net Share of Capacity Tax Capacity Admin Budget 3,695 416,540,300 2,335 130,528,100 703 90,192,500 52,176 4.092,052,500 574 95,350,000 4,000 415,321,500 9,742 475,201,300 7,671 930,521.400 5,917 621,954,800 1,831 78,266,800 1,466 182,796,700 3,616 274,998,400 4,099 543,695,000 498 106,544,900 6,652,357 2,379,874 1,443,769 69,561,756 1,549,246 6,417,375 7,312,222 14,878,853 9,489,865 1,496,620 2,883,627 4,121,663 8,414,970 1,740,406 4.8% 1.7% 1.0% 20% 1.1% 4.6% 5.3% 10.6% 6.9% 1.1% Z1% 3.0% 6.1% 1.3% 9,956.47 3,561.92 2.160.87 25,735.80 2,318.73 9,604.76 10,944.08 22,266.94 14,203.33 2,239.97 4.315.88 6,168.86 12,594.55 2,604.84 Share of Exotics Budget 4,797.22 1.716.20 1,041.15 12,400.00 1.117.21 4,627.77 5,273.07 10,729.60 6,843.43 1.079.26 2,079.47 2.972.27 6,068.29 1,255.06 Mankmim Levy Pw MN sMula 103B.635 (T«W Taiobto Maitot Vahia * JX»42«) 98,345 8,455,964,200 138,342,623 69.7% 3204,634.33 5126,679.00 |62,l Share of Total Budget In 2000 14,753.89 5.278.12 3,202.01 38,135.80 3,435.94 14,232.55 18,217.15 32,998.54 21,048.76 3,319.23 8,395J5 9.141.13 18,882J4 3,859.90 $190,879.00 Share Of Total Budget hi 1999 11.340.60 4,233.62 2,419.33 30.241.60 2,721.74 11.189.39 13,003.89 26.461.40 16,935.30 2,721.74 5,141.07 6.653.15 15,120.80 3.024.16 $151,207.99 Par MN iMuta 103B.631 , no cRy may pay moro than 20% o( ttw Mai lovy. Tho City of Minriatonia would pay a constant 20% of any amounb to bo loviod. Romaining dlios toctor for dotormining lovy amounts is computed as: (CRy Not 1 ax Capacity / (Total Not Tax Capacity - Minnotenka Not Tax CapacRy)) * 80% ToM Nat Tax CapacRy loas Minnolonka Nat Tax CapacRy Not Tax CapacRy for ramaMng IScRios 138,342,623 (69,561,756) 68,780.867 .» • . 1. • • 4*r>a*»arv^ r^ IV* A88 n^r-im 1 n#3 w mr IHf Budget itn 1BH Budget ,^^1, 1. Adminlstratiori a) LMCOCofTvnunltfMAdmnLivy b) Raaaiva Fund ConMbubon c) Court Rnas ^ Uoanaas a) Boat and WatarSafaty Education I) imarast,RiMe Fundi d OtharIneomaO 80^4 48^ 40.000 66.000 80.^4 0 43.173 106.103 108.840 0 40XXX) 100.000 8.000 1.000 11.398 3.687 8.000 2.000 n 842.068 WM raealvad from tha Frashwifiir CanAar in 1989 lor 8w ofRoa lalocaOon which oecunad bi 1096 259.640 109440 0 40491 105.871 2.240 5.716 15424 109406 15400 40400 100.000 2.100 10400 2400 92460 0 11499 85473 210 3462 49.111 SUB-TOTAL ADMNISTRATION 263424 243.885 2* ExoBca Managamant 67400 67401 b) OOwrPubOe Agencies 24400 23454 e) Prtwele SeOdMion 1.000 0 ReeMveFundAOocBlion 12.000 0 •) Intorest 12.000 8.021 SUB-TOTAL EXOTICS MANAGEMEI^117.000 09,378 TOTAL REVENUES 380.624 343,281 Total Levy 148,024 148.038 Raaarva Fund Altocatlona 80.000 0 279.462 278406 181496 64400 24400 1400 5400 12400 107400 64400 23454 0 5400 10462 104416 «400 24400 0 30.000 8400 104.000 12.«4 0 0 0 3479 16433 366440 389.666 362408 188428 174,140 5400 174.140 5400 161408 45400 mm AOMtMSTRATtON 1. 2000 Budget revWenjda 6/2A99 9.tMAM injm • 40^ 106^ 2,000 0,000 2,000 200,070 02,000 0 lOjOOO 0,000 lOOJTt 100J70 1(• • I a) SaMaa(!ncludaaM8fdlralalad8liir0ma)111.418 01464 95,480 96.161 102400 24478 196400b) Plannlna/SDaclal Prolacti Inlam 0 3469 0 0 0c) Employac Danallt ConbfbuOona 18.646 15477 16418 19473 18468 4478 19470SUB-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 130.064 107461 112498 119.403 121.166 29453 128470 2. Contractual Sarvicaa:• a) OfllcaLaaaaiSlanga 17.160 16472 17452 22451 16400 6442 11490b) Proiaaalenal Sandoaa 10400 10488 10400 10.823 10400 2482 11400 SUB-TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27.160 29460 27452 33474 26400 8424 »4i0 3. OfRca S Admlnlatotlon: a) Oflioa. Ganarat Suppliai 4.500 3.035 5.000 2.426 4400 1468 4400 b) Talaphona 2.000 4.006 4,140 3481 4.440 1,495 4440 c) Postaoa 5.000 3.175 4400 3421 4450 1,496 4400 2400 2.187 2400 657 2400 0 4400 a) Maintenanca. Oflioa Equipmant 2.000 2.470 2,000 1.655 2400 76 2400 f) SubteripOom. Mambanhlps 300 1.034 450 1.130 450 99 1400 Inauranea. Bondt 7,000 6.705 6.000 6.706 7400 0 7400*--------------------I------------■ n>-A«---------nj f'uiMc aaoniiaDon. Layai noooaa 2.000 2499 2.000 695 2400 114 2400 ^bif bfiipB 1 1.500 1480 1400 1471 1400 458 2400 4 Boat and Watar Safaty Education 794 1494 2.100 09 2400 k)WlnlamaC 274 300 75 300 0 W#bPaga/iman>atMalntanancai/Safvko 1.143 1.000 0 1400 SUB-TOTAL OFFICE & ADMOdSTRATION 26.600 26.765 28.090 24.755 32«640 5420 33g740 Pag«2«f3 i" ^ \ ■ I Si h:L. 4. CapHaiOiittay: •) Fumihm, Equipm«it b) CoflipulirM(bnra4haitfwwf: SUB-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY ■) LasalSMVicM b) Pw«cubon Sfxlow c) H«m.CounbrRooin4Boafd ^ RtoodMcflion/ZoninQ SUB-TOTAL LEGAL S. Contract SwvicM/StudiM: a) MgmIPtanImplomwiUtion b) BBilifEd.PMotPiogtiin c) RocordArcMval 4 Aocwa/Cbanncl Signago SUB-TOTAL CONTRACT SERVICESSTUOIES 7. Conbngoney TOTAL ADMINISTRATION ■XOnCS MANAOEMENT 1. WaodHafvaalingOparalional ■) SaMaaSEmptoyorTaiiaa/lnsuranoa b) Tnicfclng Conbact ^ Admlniataltva Oporalkmal Suppllaa •) Contract Satvtoaa 0 HaavyOmrlh Season Extanalon SUB-TOTAL WEED HARVESTINO OP. E 2-WaadMaivattlng Equlb. Doprodalian SUB-TOTAL WEED HARVESTING S. ZabtaMuaaelOparatlonal TOTAL EXOTICS MANAOEMENENT TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS • 17 1997 1996 1998 1999 19H 2008 !•«Actual Budget Actual Budget YTO1301)Budget 1.000 262 1.000 12 383 4,000 10.000 2.279 2.500 1.071 2.000 0 3400 11.000 2.541 3.500 1.063 3.000 383 7400 20.000 15.268 20.000 25499 20400 4.610 20400 28.000 31.028 30.000 49.497 32,000 14,171 40400 3.000 3.180 3.000 2488 4.000 1470 4400 0 7.500 0 7400 0 0 51.000 49.476 60.500 77.784 63400 20451 84400 5.000 6.050 10.200 10.071 0 4.171 18400' 5.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.S00 0 10.000 0 0 0 0 20.000 0 0 17^00 6.050 20.200 10.071 20,000 4,171 16400 10.853 6.000 24476 10400 900 10400 283^24 232,328 268,340 290.948 278,308 89,702 286,879 36.000 22.034 32.000 25.351 30.000 0 28,008 21.000 12.804 15.000 14.484 15,000 0 18,000 1.000 1.530 1.000 1.873 1,000 4 2400 22.000 14.641 20.000 22.061 15400 90 18,000 16.000 18.420 19.000 83.706 20400 843 20400 7.000 0 8.000 5463 8400 0 8,000 102.000 69.438 95,000 152447 88400 697 89400 36.000 35.000 12.000 12.000 35400 0 10.000 137.000 104.438 107.000 164.847 124.000 897 09400 15.000 989 12.000 4464 15.000 0 6400 182,000 106427 119,000 189.111 13t^897 104.000 416.624 337.783 377440 480,067 417.30S 70,m 389479 JtmMkmtngSmfthuLakmtlnmwUdatakpiwUtdfoehhimatlonalpurpo amonlf. Sav« the taka Program Incomt: a) Privala Oonattona b) (Xharlnooma c) Irrlimt 8UB-TOTAL SAVE THE LAKE MCOME 1M7 Budgtl 1M7 Actual 1S98 Budget 1998 Actual 1999 Budget 1999 YTO(MI) Save the Lalie Program Expefiaea: a) AdminUafive b) Program SUB-TOTAL SAVE WE LAKE EXPEf^ES 27.000 33.873 30.000 30.000 25.000 4,045 1.000 3441 1,800 1,800 1.000 864 4.000 7.020 7,000 7.000 5.000 2488 32,000 44.834 38.800 38,800 31400 7475 3,700 2,723 3,700 2.353 2400 489 28.300 18419 35,100 16.796 28400 3482 32.000 21.042 38,800 19,149 31,000 4,451 2000 Budgit rtvbion 6/2/99 9.06 AM • ^ • (rvri ACvWA- PagoSoTS APPENDIX A DRAFT 2000 LMCD BUDGET NOTES ADMINISTRATION • $105,500 has been budgeted for Salaries for three full-time employees and one part-time employee at current salaries and hourly rate (Im® item la). Salary adjustments for these employees have been budgeted as part of Contingency (line item 7). • $18,960, a 5% increase from 1999, has been budgeted for Office Lease & Storage (line item 2a). It is projected that Office Lease & Storage expenses for 2000 will cost the District approximately $25,000. The balance of these expenses will be off-set by funds received from the Freshwater Foundation in the Fall of 1998 move. • $11,000 has been budgeted for Professional Services (line item 2b). This includes funds for the 1999 LMCD Audit and for the District Bookkeeper. • $4,000 has been budgeted for Printing, Publications, & Advertising (line item 3d). This includes for the re-printing of Summer Rules and other District literature. • Boat and Water Safety Education (BWSE) expenses (line item 3j) generally offset revenues received (line item le) for this twice a year course for boaters who get BWI’s on Lake Minnetonka. • The purchase or lease of a new or used copy machine is planned for Furniture & Equipment (line item 4a). • $3,5000 has been budgeted for Computer Software & Hardware expenses (line item 4b). This includes operating systems and word processing software upgrades, and the replacement of one desktop computer. • $40,000 has been budgeted for Prosecution Services (line item 5b). This 25 % increase from 1999 can be attributed to the change in BWI legislation in 1998 and the recent challenges of authority of Special D^uties of the Hennepin County SherifFs Water Patrol. • $15,000 has been budgeted for Management Plan Implementation (line item 6a). Consistent with the Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka, a Boat Density Study and a User Attitude Survey are planned. • No reserve fund contribution has been budgeted for 20(X). With a projected Administrative reserve fund balance of $118,530 by 12/31/99, the District should attain the agreed upon six- month reserve for the Administrative Budget by year-end of 1999. EWM/EXOTICS MANAGEMENT • It is anticipated that the MN DNR will fund the District with a grant of approximately $24,000 to assist in the management of Eurasian Watermilfoil. $5,000 has been budgeted for Zebra Mussel expenses (line item 2). These funds will be spent on related operating expenses for the ^raydown program. A reserve fund contribution of $10,OCX) has been budgeted. With a projected EWM reserve fund balance of $95,191 by 12/31/99, this would reduce the reserve fund balance for EWM to $85,191. By the year-end 2(XX), the District should attain the agreed upon 12 month reserve for the EWM program. A transfer of $10,(XK) is budgeted to the Equipment Replacement reserve fund for equipment dq>reciation. Trends in Boat Numbers on Lake Minnetonka and Other Twin Cities Lakes and Rivers Since the Mid 1980s* XTEI^ 3.Q Twin Cities Trends (excluding Lake Minnetonka) Between 1984 and 1996 there was little overall change in boat numbers on Twin Cities area lakes at peak boating times on weekend/holiday afternoons (see leftmost set of columns on Figure 1). This same lack of change is evident for all the boat ing lake-resource classes, except those that received a public access between 1984 and 1996 (see other sets of columns on Figure 1). The St. Croix River downstream of Taylors Falls has experienced ups and downs in boat numbers at peak boating times on weekend/holiday afternoons since 1983, but no trend in boat numbers is apparent (Figure 2). The St. Croix is the major boating resource of the east side of the metro area, much like h4innetonka is the major boating resource of the west side of the metro area. It is used as intensively for boating as Minnetonka. Together the St. Croix and Minnetonka support 43 percent of all summer boating on metro waters (St. Croix 16% and Minnetonka 27%). Lake Minnetonka Trends Lake Minnetonka may have followed the same pattern as other metro area lakes and the St. Croix River; namely, since 1984 no evident trend in boat numbers at peak times on weekend/holiday afternoons. However, in the 1990s, excepting 1994, average boat numbers have been lower than in the 1980s (Figure 3a). The reason for these lower averages is a few “marginal ” boating days, days when the weather was rainy, windy and raw and when the number of boats on the water was excep tionally low. Such marginal boating days were not encountered in the boat counts of the 1980s. If these few exceptionally low days (the four days identified on Fig ure 4) aie eliminated from the averages, the “fair weather” averages in the 1990s look very similar to those in the 1980s (Figure 3b). TTie “fair weather” trend dis played on Figure 3b is probably a more accurate depiction of Lake Minnetonka trends than the “all counts” trend displayed on Figure 3a. T^is was a cooperative research effort of MN DNR and LMCD. (2) 1997 St. Croix Iwat co^ts from: 1997 Recreational Boating Study of the Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway and the Mississippi river from the Twin Cities to Lock and Dimi 10. Minnesota-Wisconsin Boundaiy Area Commission. 1998. (3) 1998 L^e Minnetonka boat counts fr^: 1998 Lake Minnetonka Boat Use Study. Conducted by Schocll & Madson, Inc. under contract with LMCD and MN DNR, 1998. Tim Kelly, MN DNR, May 1999 • Figure 1 ^ Twin Cities Seven-County Metro Area: 1964 to 1996 Comparison of Weekend/Holiday Boating Intensities by Boating Resource Class Lowir InlentJly Acres per Boat Higher Intensity □ 1984 study ■ 1996 Study ilitii iV. •‘-'i Alt Study Lekee eioept Mlnnelenks LsrgeBost- IngLskee sHtfiPubOe Access In boSistucSes BuiKHipArea BuOt-upAres Rural Ares Rural Area Lakes wISi Lakes witi Lakes wfth Lakes with PubficAccess PuMcAccesa PubOcAcoess PubUcAcceu In both skidlas In 1996 but Inbothatutfea In 1996 but DQlInlbae fifl|ln19S4 Figure 2 Lower St. Croix River Weekend/Hoiiday Afternoon Aeriai Boat Counts* (Tayion Fall* to Mouth) Number of Boats 2500 « • 1500 1000- 500 • 8 M -5“ I 1 • 1983 1985 (N-9 (NO boatoounti) 8 ■ Average 8 1 □ Maximum 8 ne» ! 8 1967 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 (N-5) <N»5) (NO (NO (NO (NO Year Tim Kelly, MN DNR, May 1999 Figure 3a & b Lake Minnetonka a. Based on all counts: Lake Minnetonka Weekend/Holiday Afternoon Aerial Boat Counts 2SOO Number of Boats (N m smm § ? 6 .1 } a 1M4 IBM IBM 1B87 IBM IBM 1BB0 1BB1 IBB* IBM IBM 1B98 1BBB 19B7 1BBB (N>e (N-5) (N-6) (N*13) (N-12) (N«14) Year boBtoountB) b Based on “fair weather" counts only (excludes 4 of 69 counts): Lake Minnetonka WeekencWoliday Aflernoon Aerial Boat Counts 2S00 2000 Number of Boats tsoo -y 1000 500 - 9S 3 ■Average D Maximum 99s ? I I a IBM 1ISS IBB* 1BB7 1*** !**• 1»« 1*B* 1**» (NM (N-5)(N^) in-13) (N-11) (N-12) Year boat count!) i \ Tun KeUy, MN DNR, May 1999 LMCD sets public hearing for reducing storage on lake Ordinance could change so only 1 boat Is allowed per 100 feet ' of sfioreline By Anne Wilbur Sun Newspapers Environment The number of boats developments and re-developments may store on the lake is about to change. A public meeting will be held to discuss a proposed change to an ordinance for the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) relating to boat storage, density and mul tiple dock facilities on Lake Minnetonka. The meeting is set for 7 p.m. July 14 at Tbnka Bay City Hall. The LMCD tabled the ordinance and established a meeting date at its regular meeting on June 8. The LMCD ordinance now allows for one boat for every 50 feet of shoreline, said Elxecutive Director Greg Nybeck. The pro posed amendment would allow one for every 100 feet of shoreline for new devel opment and re-development Other changes to the ordinance include how the leng^ of the shoreline is mea sured, he said. One amendment would only give credit for the distance between ea<^ side of the property without taking into account the natur^ meandering of the shoreline. For outlots with clusters of docks the LMCD will be discussing a requirement for large setbacks from adjacent side yards, Nybeck said. It is also considering amendments requiring the placement of the clustered do^ toward the center of the property. *^e LMCD is considering changing the *ohe per 50” amendment because shore line for new development is becoming more marginal and boats are getting big ger, he said. In other news, the LMCD reviewed the draft' of the 20(X) LMCD budget which is set to be adopted at its meeting on June 23 and sent to member cities on July 1. Future LMCD meetings: 7 p.m. June 23. o >Ha * PA 00 r-C oo o> Cv^ sgilss§llli§ • Pi' V 1 ^ • III I ◄ 9' I 9c R c « c .C £c c c: -1 meeting JUN 2 1999. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION cut wr unUNO 4 Date: June 24,1999 . Item No.: Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaf&on^ljfl^^^ Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: # 2372 Barry & Janiece Haglund, 4590 North Arm Drive West - Final Subdivision Approval - Resolution Zoning District: LR-1 A, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 2 acre, unsewered Application:2-lot plat of 5.5 acre parcel to create one new building site. List of Exhibits A - Final Plat Drawings B - Final Plat Approval Resolution C - Preliminary Plat Approval Resolution No. 4096 D - Preliminary Plat Approval Extension Resolution No. 4290 E - Background on North Arm Lane Agreements with Armstrong Family F - MCWD Permit The Haglund's have substantially completed the conditions of preliminary plat approval. An agreement has been reached with regards to City acquisition of North Arm Lane as a public road, subject to final execution of the various obligations of the agreement (see below). The applicants are requesting final plat approval, which staff recommends granting subject to a number of conditions as outlined in the attached Resolution, Exhibit A. Stormwater Pond Pursuant to the City's requirement that this site be provided with a stormwater pond, and based on the applicant's willingness to provide one as an amenity, a small stormwater pond will be constructed near the southeast comer of Lot 1 . The MCWD granted a variance to their Rule B standards then in effect (June 1998) and did not require a stormwater pond nor monetary contribution. The Resolution is written to require a Developers Agreement and security for construction of this pond. If Council so chooses, this condition could be changed to require the pond be constructed at the time a building permit is issued as part of the site grading for a new residence on Lot 1, avoiding the need for a letter of credit for what is a ^’ery minor grading project... #2372 - Haglund - Final Plat Approval June 24, 1999 Page 2 Park Dedication Fee The City Assessor in July 1998 established a valuation for Lot 1 at $64,000, which at 8% would yield a Park Dedication Fee of $5,120. However, this exceeds the maximum allowed park fee. Therefore, the park fee to be charged will be the maximum allowed by ordinance, $4900. North Arm Lane Acquisition At the time of preliminary plat approval in June 1998, Council established that the applicant need merely acquire an easement from the Armstrong's (who are fee owners of the 33' x 854.5' corridor in which North Arm Lane exists) from Lot 1 to the traveled and maintained portion of North Arm Lane. Council subsequently directed staff to pursue the acquisition of the entire 33' North Arm Lane corridor. In April 1999 after some months of discussion, an agreement was reached with the Armstrong family members, as follows: 1.The City will agree to pay $2,500 to the Armstrong family and the purchaser of the new Haglund lot, Dave Supprell, will pay an additional $2,500 plus Armstrong's legal fees incurred. 2.The City will agree to continue plowing the road all the way to the existing farmhouse without cost to the Armstrongs as it has in the past. i.The City will agree to dedicate (declare) the road as a public roadway. North Arm Lane will continue to be maintained by the City as a public road. No charges will be assessed against the Armstrong property for normal road maintenance or repair. In the event of -^^ecial assessment for improvements to North Arm Lane, the City would ds^ . a .^seisment on the Armstrong homestead property until such time as the property is subaivided or sold. 4. The City will accept deeds of conveyance from the Haglunds, Smiths and Sladeks for road access to North Arm Drive. The Haglund dedication will appear on the formal plat as a public road dedication. This agreement was brought to the Council's attention as an information item in the April 12 agenda packet, and should be formally ratified by Council action. The City Anomey has been working with the Armstrong’s attorney to formalize documents to complete this agreement. r ♦ #2372 - Haglund - Final Plat Approval June 24,1999 Page 3 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the final plat resolution with conditions as attached, and further recommends that Council take formal action to accept the agreement for acquisition of North Arm Lane as a public road. Staff recommends that the Developer’s Agreement be required for stormwater pond construction as noted in the resolution. Upon adoption of the resolution, release of the fmal plat for filing will be contingent on completion of all remaining documents and conditions. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Take formal action to accept the North Arm Lane acquisition agreement subject to City Attorney acceptance of all necessary documents. Adopt or amend the attached final plat approval resolution. i i i c:R.DoaNo. !Y THESE PRESEHTS mND^ a aa NORTH yM Mid didteili to toa piMc tef day of L, HKbnd *«d jMto*. 1 *- dfly ofand mM Ci*«tw HortBag* pnaantt *** olBef« Ifda • Janitca R. Haglund CORPORATION, a corporidoii organtoad and axlaling undac ttia la i«M of Iha CocnmomMoaHh of Virginia iSOCIATION NO. a nadonal banking ______aka ____________________ ladon *___________ Tha forasoing Mnmm* «m "*IM_ by Barry L. Magluod and Janlaca a Magtond, buahand and adla. day of Notary PubSc,County, My conwnlBslon axpiraa Tha loiagoing htlnanaM <»a aetawaladgod bafoia «• and by day of of Craatar Mortgaga iS^^;;^rtwaawla«Wln9yi5a>»ala<«aof»aCanaiwii«iaa W<ofVlf9lnla.onbaha»ofttwcofporaflon. NolafTPuMc,County, % commiaalon oxpiraa , Tha loragoing toa buwa nt was ack noadadga d batera ma tfiia , ha ________________ and by.________________________, Ha day of of US Bank. Nadonal vtal banking aaaocladon, on bahalf of ttia aaaoclatlon. Notary Pubic.County, My convnlaaion aapiraa . ava aurvayad and platlad lha proparty daacrfbad on IfUa plat as NORTH ARM OVERLOOK; that this plat b a corract aurvay; ttiat al dlatancaa ara corra^ shown In faat and hundradtha of a foot; that an monumanta hava baan I ground as shown; that tha outsida boundary Hnas ara corractly dasignatad on said plat; and that thara ara no MS 508.02. Subd.1 to ba dasignatad on said plat Mark S. Gronbarg. Land Survayor and Enginaar Mbinaaota Ucansa Numbar 12755 N) Tha foragolng Inatrximant was ackr>owladgad bafora ma this Land Survayor and Enginaar. day of, Notary Pubic.County. Minnasota My commission axplras \AM OVERLOOK was approved and accaptad by lha City Councl of tha City of Orono, Mfonasota. at a ragutor d Ihis ______________ day of _________________, 1W___K spplcabla, tha wrinan commants and□ mis - WT « • -------- — lha CofTwniiBiontf of Transportation and tha County Mlghv^y EngW>aar hava boan racalvad by lha City, or tha rfod has alapsad without racalpt of such commants and racommandatfons. as provldad by Mtortaseta Statutas, 2.emr couNcn. of the ctty of orono , Minnesota Mayor ..Cla'fk S DIVISION, Hannapin County, Mbinasota aaas payabis In 1SS and prior years hava bsan paid for land dascribad on this plat Dated tote ____,m_ 3R. HENNEPIN COUNFY AUDITOR Deputy annapki County, Mbmasola AT. Sac. 5138418 (1H8) this plat has baan approved tote .day of, «NNEPIN COUNTY SURVEYOR L Hsnnapki County. Mbutasola „ : toe witobi plat of NORTH ARM OVERLOOK was fliad for record In tote office tote I____ St___________o’clock ___^JL day of «. NENNEPM COUNTY RECORDER 1 Deputy I SIRVEYORSL PlAWi A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF NORTH ARM OVERLOOK FILE NO. 2372 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a two-lot plat by Barry and Janiece Haglund (hereinafter "the subdividers"); and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the LR-1 A, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that would allow its use for a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed or has agreed to complete all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1.Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 4096, the resolution granting preliminary approval of the Class III subdivision. 2. Dedication on the plat of standard perimeter drainage and utility easements. 3. 4. Provision of drainage calculations for pre- and post-development stormwater quantity and quality conditions, and design of stormwater and drainage improvements and facilities. Designation and dedication of drainage easements over the stormwater pond within the plat. Page 1 of4 r 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Provision of evidence of stormwater management plan approval from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Dedication to the City of public roadway for North Arm Lane and Nordi Arm Drive West. Granting of a partial temporaiy cul-de-sac easement over the northeasterly portion of Lot 1. Creation of covenants for Lot 1 for protection of drainfield sites, including protective language for alternate septic sites along with site plans locating both primary and alternative sites, and alerting future property owners of the need to protect sites on adjacent properties. Execution of a Subdivider's Agreement providing for the installation of drainage and stormwater facilities required as a condition of subdivision approval, and posting of security to ensure that these required improvements are completed to the City's satisfaction, the design of said improvements subject to approval of the City Engineer. 10. Payment to the City for the final plat review fee and fee for legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $400.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of North Arm Overlook, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions; 1.Prior to release of the plat for filing, applicant shall provide to the City evidence of an access easement in favor of applicant's property over the 33* privately owned corridor adjacent to the east side of the property; except that at such time that a road and utility easement over (or fee title to) the 33' corridor is obtained by the City, this condition shall become null and void. Page 2 of 4 J 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Lot 2 shall continue to access to North Arm Drive West via the existing private driveway. Lot 1 shall directly access North Arm Lane via a private driveway as shown on the preliminary plat drawings. All identified primary and alternate sewage system drainfield sites v^thin Lot 1 shall be fenced off prior to any land alterations, and such fencing shall remain in place until such time that Lot 1 is developed. Payment of Park Dedication Fee for Lot 1 in the amount of $4,900. Subdivider shall construct stormwater management improvements generally as shown on the Preliminary Plat Drawing dated April 22,1998, revised June 17,1998 subject to any revisions of said plan as may be required by the City Engineer. Erosion control shall be maintained over all disturbed areas until natural groundcover is restored, adhering to guidelines found in 'Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas'. The stormwater improvements shall be constructed to City requirements, subject to a Developers Agreement executed between the City and the developer. Drainage and stormwater improvement construction can begin as soon as the final plans have been formally approved by the City Engineer and the Developers Agreement has been executed. No building permit will be issued for I.ot 1 until the stormwater management improvements have been completed by the developer and approved by the City. Prior to City release of the plat for filing, applicant shall provide evidence of fee ownership of the property in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, and applicant shall meet any other title requirements as may be required by the City Attorney. Applicant shall provide all documents noted in this resolution in a format acceptable to the City Attorney prior to release of the plat for filing, anJ ..hall complete all conditions to the satisfaction of City staff, prior to release of the plat for filing. Page 3 of 4 10. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder ’s Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before December 28, 1999 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements, deeds and covenants noted above. The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application >vith the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 28th day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA .) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 28th day of June, 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 I C CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL . NO. 4 0 9 6 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY approval of a SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4590 NORTH ARM DRIVE WEST - FILE NO. 2372 WHEREAS, Bany and Janiece Haglund (hereinafter the "subdividers") on April 22, 1998, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two lot residential plat of property legally described as: The South 854.50 feet of the West 280.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5di Principal Meridian; Hennepin County, Minnesota. (hereinafter "the property"); and • WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono ’s Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18, 1998, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportumty to speak thereon, and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on June 8, 1998 the Orono City Council considered the subdmsion application of the subdivider noting the following fmdings of fact: 1. The property is located within the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable • land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of approximately 5.41 acres of land exclusive of right-of-way of North Arm Drive West. Page 1 of 7 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 0 9 6 j. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. There are no City-protected wetlands located on the property. A wetland delineation shall be completed for the small depressional area at the southeast comer of Lot 1 to determine whether that area qualifies as a protected wetland under WCA regulations. The proposed plat consists of two residential lots each meeting the minimum lot standard requirements of the LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District, each meeting the minimum 2.0 acre lot area requirement and each meeting the minimum 200' lot width requirement as measured at the rear of the defined front yard. Both lots will be served by private wells and individual onsite sewage treatment systems. Septic system site evaluation and design information has been submitted coiifirming that each lot contains suitable primary and alternate drainfield sites to serve the existing and proposed residences. Lot 2 contains an existing residence structure and detached garage, both of which will continue to meet the required setbacks from existing and proposed lot lines. The detached garage will remain nearer the front lot line than the residence structure as allowed via variances granted by the City in 1991. The City expects that in the future North Arm Lane will be upgraded to be more in conformity with public road design standards than the existing narrow gravel roadway. In order to accommodate such future upgrade the City will require the dedication of additional right-of-way from this subdivision including 8.5' along Page 2 of? Lot 2 will continue to access directly south to North Arm Drive West via the existing private driveway. Lot 1 will access directly east onto North Arm Lane, a gravel public road maintained by the City. North Arm Lane exists mostly within a 33' wide, privately owned parcel abutting the applicant's property and . . owned by the adjacent property owner to the north. The City claims a prescriptive easement right to the entire width of the maintained road and shoulders, but may not have rights to the entire 33' corridor. For this reason, applicant shall obtain an access easement from the owner of the 33' corridor to allow applicant the right to access the City road from applicant's property. . CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4 09 6NO. the east boundary and additional area near the intersection of North Arm Lane ^ and North Arm Drive West, as shown in the sketch attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Additionally, to potentially accommodate a future cul-de-sac at the current terminus of North Arm Lane, applicant will be required to grant a road and utility easement for a portion of a cul-de-sac within the northeast comer of Lot 1, such easement subject to potential vacation or extinguishment should a cul-de-sac at some future date no longer be required due to the northward extension of North Arm Lane or other factors, at the discretion of the City. 9.Applicant will be required to provide drainage calculations to determine whether stormwater management facilities will be required. Applicant will also be required to obtain the approprite permits from the Mirmehaha Creek Watershed District. 9.The Orono Park Commission has recommended that no additional right-of-w'ay or trail cjisements are required from this developer since any fliture trail needs can be accommodated within the existing right of way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of Barry and Janiece Haglund per preliminary plat drawings by Mark S. Gronberg, a licensed surveyor of Coffin & Gronberg, Inc, dated April 22, 1998, subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicant shall dedicate on the plat 33* of public right-of-way for North Arm Drive West per the above-referenced preliminary plat drawing. Additionally, applicant shall dedicate public right-of-way. for North Ann Lane on the plat as depicted in Exhibit A attached. 2. Applicant shall provide to the City evidence of an access easement in favor of applicant's property over the 33' privately owned corridor adjacent to the east side of the property. 3. Lot 2 shall continue to access to North Arm Drive West via the existing private driveway. Lot 1 shall directly access North Arm Lane \da a private driveway as Page 3 of 7 j CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 0 9 6 r 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. on the preliminary plat drawings. approval the applicant shall provide drainage calculations for fjn> an‘-5 ^j«it-deveiopment stormwater quantity and quality conditions and if Vt'i* ,:;&!ted or if required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, shall cchstruc) 3s:*.it3<)le stormwater ponds or vegetative buffers as the case may be, .1'.bjec'?: a Uevelopers Agreement to be executed between the City and the •'^•'.’elopei. Dninage casements shall be designated over all drainage ways and to TOH'aler pond:' within the plat. /o 'final plat approval applicant shall provide a wetland delineation report Pr operty and if any WCA protected wetlands are found they shall be io covenants advising future property owners of the limitations on j^^ftt'iidons of said w'etlands. S^i'bdivider is hereby advised that the City will not grant final plat approval imtil MCWD has approved all grading and drainage improvements on the |V£operty. All identified primary and alternate sewage system drainfield sites within the subdivision shall be fenced off prior to any land alterations, and such fencing shall remain in place until such time that each Lot is developed. Subdivider shall develop covenants for each lot for protection of drainfield sites within each Lot. Covenants shall include protective language for alternate septic sites along with site plans locating both primary and alternative sites. Applicant shall include language alerting future property owners of need to protect sites on adjacent properties. Payment of standard Park Dedication Fee for Lot 1 Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire within one year of the date of Council approval, June 8, 1999. Should the subdivider fail to complete thr filing of the final plat application within the year deadline, it shall oe necessu.r>. for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. Page 4 of?K 1 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 40-^6.:----- Final Plat Submittals: The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1..Tecord plat c.. .vings in the form of ; (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: a. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. dated April 22, 1998, except as modified below. b. Dedication on the plat of additional right-of-way for North Arm Lane per Exhibit A attached. c.Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10' wide along the exterior boundaries of property and 5' along the internal lot lines. d. Designation and dedication of drainage easements over detention ponds and drainageways as may be required. e. Naming of the plat. 2. Legal documents required: a.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat'and all other documents affected by such interest. b.The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c.Signed and executed Developer's Agreement and letter of credit for site drainage improvements if required. d.Signed and execiUed Drainage Easements to be taken over drainageway and detention areas within plat. Page 5 of 7 1 CITY of ORONO m'h'RESOLUTION OF JHECIXY COUNCIL NO. _ e.Signed and executed Road, Drainage and Utilities Easement over the portion of cul-de-sac within Lot 1 as shown in Exhibit A. 3.Fees to be paid: Total due: $400.00* Final plat fee = $200.00a. b.Legal review and filing fees for subdivision and associated documents $200.00 c.♦Park Dedication Fee: amount shall be determined as soon as City Assessor has placed a fair market value on the undeveloped land at the time of preliminary plat approval. The subdivider shall be advised as soon as Assessor's report has been filed with City. Per City ordinance, if the fair market value of Lot 1 exceeds $61,250 the required park dedication fee shall not exceed $4,900. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 8th day of June, 1998. STATE OF MD4NESOTA' ‘) • )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of June, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Mirmesota murucipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. CAROLE A HASEMAN j| ( /7. NOTARY PUBUOMINNESOIA fi Nntarv Public '' vxi" *.7 HENNEPIN COUNTY S Notary rUDllC ; My Ccn;tnis$lcn Expires Jsn. 31.2000 « Page 6 of? vmrir.'X'Hn'.r. . .Hsa (T^ PR CERTIFI —BAf- THE SE. .1/4 • HENNF.F 77?B6pebiCA-nEtiSVt/AC>LUivn5 “T'? iOF CMLS>& V-"* i •»’'7-'/■•' •'» J /T“ Ce^ns>^^f~ 53* i (^s ^biws eyjir/fG ^Ci )|^x i* /PO* CjQ” CCVCKD • • 4CVOON OATC MscK^rc*! 0M«M COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC, p CITYof ORONO a I r 7 rm RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 42 9 0NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR A PLAT PROPOSED AT 4590 NORTH ARM DRIVE WEST -FILE NO. 2372 WHEREAS, on June 8, 1998 the City Council of the City of Orono adopted Resolution No. 409o granting preliminary plat appro^'al of a plat proposed by applicants Barry and Janiece Haglund involving the property located at 4590 North Arm Drive West; and WHEREAS, the effective period of preliminary plat approval expires on June 8, 1999; and * WHEREAS, the applicants have advised the Council that they are unable to complete the conditions of preliminary plat approval because the City is still in the process of formalizing the acquisition of the North Arm Lane corridor as a public roadway which will provide the applicants v.ith legal access to the property; and WHEREAS, the City, has reached an agreement with the owners of the North Arm Lane corridor which is expected to result in the City’s acquisition of said corridor in a short time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono that the effective period of preliminary plat approval for Barry and Janiece Haglund's proposed plat of property located at 4590 North Arm Drive West as originally approved per the conditions of Resolution No. 4096, adopted on June 8, 1998 is hereby extended to December 8, 1999. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 24th day of May, 1999. ATTEST: t /yn Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 1 of2 . i (• •I « I I a-1 t GlTYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley ParKway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 March 31,1999 Joel A. '^eltz, Attorney At Law Southdale Office Center 6600 France Avenue South - Suite 425 Miruieapolis, MN 55435 VIA FACSIMILE & U.S. MAIL Re: North Arm Lane Dear Mr. Seitz: Thank you for your letter of March 12 proposing a resolution of the North Arm Lane issue. I think we are close to an agreement, with a few minor points to resolve, as follows: 1.The City \sill agree to pay $2,500 of the $5,000 sum, and the purchaser of the new Haglund lot, Dave Supprell, has verbally indicated he will pay the remaining $2,500. 2. The City will agree to continue plowing the road all the way to the existing farmhouse without cost to the Armstrongs as it has in the past. 3.The City will agree to dedicate (declare) the road as a public roadway. North Arm Lane will continue to be maintained by the City as a public road. No charges will be assessed against the Armstrong property for normal road maintenance or repair. Joel, we are struggling with the issue of future road upgrades not being assessed to the Armstrong property as a benefitting property. While the City at this time has no plan to upgrade North Arm Lane to a paved status, nor to do other improvements for drainage or what have you, and while there is no hue and cry from the neighborhood to upgrade it, the City would have to respond if the neighborhood wanted it upgraded and petitioned for such an upgrade. If such an upgrade was costly enough to warrant a special assessment project, then we would normally assess all benefitting abutting properties, which would logically include the Armstrong property. To not assess the Armstrongs for such a project, when the rest of the benefitting neighbors would be assessed, would be difficult to justify to the rest of the neighbors. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 Joel Seitz March 31,1999 Page 2 Your letter suggests that the Armstrongs would agree to such assessments at such time the homestead property is developed. Perhaps a middle ground could be reached, as follows: In the event of a special assessment for improvements to North Arm Lane, the City would defer the assessment on the Armstrong homestead property until such time as the property is subdivided or sold. 4.The City will accept deeds of conveyance from the Haglunds, Smiths and Sladeks for road access to North Arm Drive. The Haglund dedication would appear on the formal plat as a public road dedication. The deferral proposal has not been presented to the City Council, but if your clients find it to be an acceptable alternative, we would propose this solution to Council at their April 12 meeting. The Council has been made aware of the otht. facets of your proposal and has not indicated any problems with them. Please call me if you have any questions (249-4600). I hope your clients find this proposal acceptable. Michael P. Gaffron Senior Planning Coordinator cc:Carol Pass by facsimile 722-5509 Barry Haglund by facsimile 472-5714 Ron Moorse, City Administrator Tom Barrett, City Attorney Greg Gappa, Public Services Director SELTZ & SELTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW SOUTHDALE OFFICE CENTRE 6600 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH-SUITE 425 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55435 GEORGE O. SELTZ JOEL A. SELTZ TELEPHONE: (612) 925-4147 FAX; (612) 925-1926 ELAINE WHEELER LEGAL ASSISTANT April 23,1999 ► ' APR Ho Cl f Y u m? Michael P. Gaffron Senior Planning Coordinator City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Re: Armstrong (North Arm Lane) Our File J5034 Dear Mr. Gaffron: After discussing the matter with my clients, they are in full agreement with the proposal as presented in your letter of March 31,1999 including your counter proposal specified in paragraph 3. However, the final settlement is contingent upon my attorney fees being paid by other than my clients. I have contemporaneously with this letter informed the Haglunds that my clients will proceed under the terms specified in your letter of March 31,1999 if they pay my attorney fees. I trust this will be amicably settled and I thank you for your professional assistance. Sincerely, SELTZ & A Professioi] taited lAbilih' Partnership JAS/ew cc: Carol Pass (F/J(: 722-5509) I From : BIBLE LIT INT B HAGLUND PHONE No. : 614 436 6733 Apr. 27 1999 10:40AM P01 April 26. 1999 m ••• • Mr. Joel A. Sell?. Allomcy At 1 .aw SouthHflte Office Center 6600 iM uncc Ave. So. Suite 425 Minneapolis, MN. 55435 Dear Mr. Seitz Re: Nonh Ami Liino Armstrong/Haglund We received your correspondence doted April 23''* by fax last Fi iday. This outlines your client ’s conditionol uuccptuncc jf the terms of the City of Orono letter dated March 31,1909 pending .lanieco and I poying the cost of your ntloi ncy fees. We agree to be responsible Ibr these fees which, per your letter, amount to St030. 1 have advised Mr. GafFron at the City of Orono of our acceptance He is anticipating a call from you at once to handle the next steps and logistics of title transfer. Please contact me today at 472-.^714 if you have any questions. Thank-you. Sincerely, cc: Carol Pass (Fax: 722-5509) iariy Haglund Janiece Haglund hPR.27.1999 5:31PM • • MO.731 P.l 4.11. SELTZ & SELTZ ATTORKE YS AT LAW SOUTHDALE OFFICE CENTRE $600 FRANCE AVENUE SOOTH-SUITE 425 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55435 & GEORGE 0. SELTZ JOEL A. SELTZ ELAINE WHia-LER LEGAL ASSISTANT TELEPHONE; (612) 92S.AI47 FAX: (612)925-1926 April 27, 1999 f™? rACSIMlLE 473-0510 ADO U.S. MAILMxchael p, Gaffron Senior Planning Coordinator City of Orono P»0» Box 66 Crystal Bay, mn 55323-0066 . r- Re:Our Client; Armstrong Property: North Arm Lane PIN # 06-117-23-24 0003 Our File No. J5034 Dear Mr. Gaffron: our a iGttsr from Mr. Haglund agreeing to the terme of JAS/we Minnehaha Greek Watershed District F Improving Quality ofWater, Quality ofLife Gray Freshwater Center Hwys. t5 & 19, Navarre Man: 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MN 55331-9578 Phone:(612)471-0590 Fax:(612)471-0682 Email: adminOminnehahacreek.org Web Site: www.minnehahacreek.org Board of Managers Pamela G. Blixt James Calkins Lance Fisher Monica Gross Thomas W.LaBounty Thomas Maple, Jr. Malcolm Reid District Office: Diane P. Lynch Oistnct Administrator MrM on (tcydid pl^ ceAltilinS aiM«30%pO«canium*> noSi. July 10,1998 Mr. Barry Haglund 4590 North Arm Drive Orono.MN 55364 I .! RE: MCWD Permit Application No. 98-97 Dear Mr. Haglund: The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers reviewed the above mentioned permit application at their Board meeting on July 9, 1998. It was the action of the Board to approve this application and grant a variance concerning the MCWD R::le B requirement for a stormwater retention pond. Therefore neither a stormwater pond nor a contribution m lieu of a pond will be required for this project. This action was based on the fact that this project involves single family residences, total impervious surface is minimal, and the potential for infiltration of stormwater runoff is high. The followinc conditions apply: ® • Reimbursement of mailing costs in the amount of $26.05 • Payment of Rule J fees in the amount of $79.25. Due to the size and complexity of certain projects, the Board, by Rule J, requires that site inspections be conducted. In these cases, the applicant is required to pay to the District, a fee equal to the actual costs of analysis of the project, field inspection, engineering services, legal services, and any subsequent monitoring of the work. These costs are referred to as Rule J fees. Once the above conditions have been met staff will issue the permit. You are reminded that work on the project cannot begin until the permit has been issued. Please call me at 471-0590 with any questions. Sincerely, Hafner District Technician c:Mark Gronberg, Coffin & Gronberg Liz Van Zomeren, City of Orono Steve Schmunk, Wenck Associates COUMCIL MEETING JUN 2 ft W99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: June 24,1999 11 Ul- UHONO ■ Item No = 7 Department Approval: A4minlstrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaf&or Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Admiis Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2439 - Service 800 - 2190 Wayzata Boulevard - Review MnDOT Permit Proposal for the Brimhall Access List of Exhibits A - 3-leg and 4-Leg Intersection "Potential Conflicts" Diagram B - Road Schematic of Site and Area C - June 11 Staff Memo Cliff Otten applied to MnDOT for reconveyance of the 'Brimhall triangle' property in April, and has applied for an access permit on behalf of Service 800. MnDOT has indicated, as noted in the June 11 staff memo, that they will agree to issue a permit for an access that incorporates all possible turning movements except for a left-turn out (eastbound from the site). However, in a meeting called by MnDOT on June 22, staff learned that MnDOT is SvronBly HUrnnra^^ng the eastbound left-turn in to the site, although they will permit it if the City is adamant. Further, they wish to issue this permit for Service 800 only , and any future use by Otten or conversion to a City road would require a new MhiDOT permit. MnDOTs concern, as expressed by Tom O’Keefe, is that allowing eastbound left-turns into the site adds to the safety concerns of this intersection. The existing 3-leg Brimhall intersection as it has functioned for many years, has 5 "potential intersection conflict points" (see diagram). Turning this into a 4-leg, all-option intersection as the City originally anticipated, would have a total of 16 conflict points. Eliminating the left turn exit from Service 800 (per June 11 staff memo)would reduce this to n rnnflict points. Council accepted this plan without comment. Additionally eliminating the left turn entrance to Service 800 (as Service 800 now proposes and as MnDOT now suggests) reduces this further to 9 conflict points. With both left-turn exit and entrance possibilities eliminated, MnDOT would also make this a right-in/right-out only configuration, which would eliminate straight crossing movements and reduce the intersection to just 5 conflict points, i.e. relatively as safe as it is today. #2439 - Service 800 Access Issue June 24,1999 Page 2 Cliff Otten has indicated he wishes more than merely a right-in/right-out at this location for his liiture use, since he already has adequate right-in access along 12. For his future use and for future City use, a full intersection would provide greater flexibility. While the eastbound left-tum lane could be constructed at a future date, the City chose to link development of the Service 800 site as a trigger for the Brimhall access to occur, with Service 800 bearing the costs of creating the eastbound left-tum lane. Service 800 has agreed to constmct the left-tum lane if it is required. If the City concludes the left-tum lane is not required now but might be at some future date, an option might be an agreement with Service 800 and MnDOT, to include financial security for future turn lane constmction. The 1988 Highway 12 Comp Plan Amendment contemplated a rear service road between Willow Drive and Brown Road with an optional mid-point access to Hwy 12 across from Brimhall, to eliminate other business driveway accesses directly to 12. The Comp Plan did not strictly specify whether this should be a full turning movement access. The proposals to not allow full left-tum movements again brings up the issue of forcing users of the Service 800 site, and eventually Otten's site, to make U-tums along Highway 12, which is what the City was attempting to avoid by having a full-tuming-movement intersection. Eastbound traffic vdshing to access Service 800 will be forced to use Bill Wear's shopping center (or some other site further east) to turn around. Wear's site should not have to be used in this marner. By the same token, people exiting Service 800 wanting to travel east, will have to make U-tums at Willow. This is probably a relatively safe movement, but inconvenient. Currently, the properties on the south side of Highway 12 have full turning movements at the Brimhall intersecticii Mn/DOT initially indicated it would prefer that the left hand turning movements on both the north and south side of the intersection be limited to left turns in and that left turns out not be allowed. This would be problematic for the existing businesses on the south side of Highway 12 who currently have the left-tum-out and left-tum-in access. Long Lake has indicated they will oppose any action that reduces these options. Frontage Road Revisited The concerns expressed by Mn/DOT regarding the safety of turning movements at the unsignalized Brimhall intersection, and the need expressed by Cliff Otten for full turning movements at this intersection in the future, return us to the frontage road option. Staff strongly believes the best solution to the access issues in this area of Highway 12 is a frontage road. During discussions of the Townline Road intersection and access to the expanding retail area in Maple Plain, the Council has advocated for limiting accesses to Highway 12 through a frontage road system. The same concept applies to the provision of access to the developing commercial area along Highway 12 in Orono. • : #2439 - Service 800 Access Issue June 24,1999 Pages Staff Recommendatioo While the MnDOT safety diagrams are illustrative of potential safety concerns, they don't address the safety aspects of U-tums which would be forced to occur. Staff is still recommending that the eastbound left-turn lane be constructed and that left-tum-in movements be allowed by MnDOT. Tom O'Keefe has been asked to attend the June 28 meeting to better define MnDOPs position on this matter. COUNOL ACTION REQUESTED Determine whether City should accept a right-in/right-out only access for Service 800 across from Brimhall Avenue. i- I; r f Y • •••••* • • • • •• • • • 3-Leg Intersection Through'Flow Crossing 0 t Through-Flow Crossing 5 Number of Conflicts 4 - Leg Intersection • 0 i I'Z- Through - Flow Crossing 4 Turning - Flow Crossing 12 Number of Conflicts: Trunk Highway 7 (ftk\-----smupv w i^e^\J\ce g.oo V ? O (T etnnrrn- MrilRP nrnnrl !>7n‘ •• fob'll ^ 71/AO Soo 5 Y ^ UOC:S<r Potential Intersection #% •% i**i t.. • • 4 - Leg Intersection • $ h 4 Wi^Y/2- Through - Flow Crossing 4 Q Turning - Flow Crossing 12 Number of Conflicts: ^d^ice' So o • /)0 L£f^V/AKi e?<lT i)oo ^ C^PUcT'j4v>U73 ‘ Ai * I \ 1^1 tr^rt nfn •« fnoci .. ___ Potential Intcrsectfon .. c request for council action Date: June 11,1999 Item No Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Name: MichaelP. Gaf&on Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: . • Zoning Item Description: #2439 - Service 800 Road Agreement - 2nd Amendment of Deadline List of Exhibits A - Second Amendment to Road Agreement & B - Transmittal Letter C - First Amendment to Road Agreement D - May 17 Letter from Hugh Maynard Cliff Otten appUed to MnDOT for reconveyance of the 'Brimhall triangle' proper^ in April, but the MnDOT revfewprocess is taking longer than anticipated. As of this mormng, we beheve the process should be completed by the end of July. The deadlines in the Road Agreement were estabUshed to keep the proc«s mo^g towmd completion. Staff has no problem recommending the extension of the May 31 deadhne foi MnD^OTs reconveyance approval, for an additional two mon*s to July 31 (the attached document extends it only to June 30 - we wiU have a corrected version for Monday s meetmg). Safety Concerns Regarding Full Turning Movements concerns about the safety of providing full turning movements at the Brmihall location. They anticipate that, given the level of traffic on Highway 12, full left tummg movements may create siety problems at the intersection. If this occurs, Mn/DOT would have the authonty to eliminate some of the left turn movements. Currently, the properties on the south side of Highway 12 have Ml ^g movements at tte Brimhall intersection. MnffJOT initially indicated it would movements on both the north and south side of the mtersect.on be limited to left turns m left turns out not be allowed. Although this would ht preferred by Service 800 out only access, it would be problematic for the existmg busmesses on the south side of Highway 12 who currently have the left turn out access. j #2439 - Service 800 Road Agreement June 11,1999 Page 2 t After further review, Mh/DOT has agreed to authorize left-tum-in access for Service 800 while ’ maintmning the full turning movements on the south side of the intersection. Staff believes this is a reasonable balance between safety concerns and providing reasonable access to Service 800. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Approve extending the deadline for MnDOT reconveyance approval to July 31,1999. * \ \ COUNCIL MEETING JUN 2 d 1999 CU Y Uf UhONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: June 24,1999 Item No.: Department Approval: ^ Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron [/ Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2474 - C. Steven & Susan Wilson , 325 Brown Rd. S72150 Abingdon Way Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Certificate of Survey C - Planning Commission Minutes 4-19-99 D - Standard Drainage & Utility Easement E - Staff Memo and Exhibits of 4-9-99 Applicants own both properties involved in this lot line rearrangement. The Abingdon Way lot is the last vacant lot in Abingdon Glen, and is about 5 acres, half of which is wetland protected under an existing Flowage and Conservation Easement. Applicants' residence is on Brown Road South. The two parcels are separated by Long Lake Creek. Applicants ’ goal is to gain access to the Luce Line from their residence lot by creating a corridor from the easterly 60’ of the Abingdon Way lot; a second goal is to protect a row of trees along the east line of the Abingdon Way lot. The critical conditions identified by staff and Planning Commission as necessary for approval include: 1. Confirmation that the Abingdon Way lot ends up with at least 2.0 acres of contiguous dry buildable land per the RR-IB Zoning District standards. 2. Confirmation that the Abingdon Way lot will retain its two tested drainfield sites meeting the required setbacks from the new lot line. 3. Confirmation that the Abingdon Way lot will still have a viable building site. 4. Creation of a new drainage and utility easement along the new lot line. Planning Commission Recommendation On April 19 Planning Commision voted 6-0 to recommend approval subject to the 4 above conditions, finding no variances would be required and each lot would be conforming eifter the proposed lot line rearrangement is completed. Staff Recommendation Applicants ’ surveyor has confirmed that the Abingdon Way lot will meet the 2.0 acre minimum dry 1 #2474 - Wilson June 24, 1999 Page 2 buildable standard, with the new lot line being 60.00 feet west of the existing lot line. A review of the original septic testing information provided when Abingdon Glen was platted, indicates the septic sites will still meet the required 20' lot line setback. The potential buildable envelope for this lot will be slightly smaller than before the lot line rearrangement, but will still provide for two potential house sites. Staff recommends approval of the lot line rearrangement subject to applicants granting the required 10' drainage and utility easement adjacent to the new lot line. The old 10’ easement will remain in place (no vacation was requested). COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED . Adopt or amend the attached resolution granting final approval for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for C. Steven and Susan Wilson at 325 Brown Road South/2150 Abingdon Way. 1 i' i \ A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 325 BROWN ROAD SOUTH AND 2150 ABINGDON WAY FILE NO. 2474 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the aj^lication for a Class I subdivision of a lot line rearrangement by C. Steven Wilson and Susan Wilson (hereinafter "the applicants") involving properties legally described as follows: Lot 5, Block 1, Abingdon Glen, Hennepin County, Minnesota and The south 900.00 feet of the east 700.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota; (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have completed all requirements of the City for a Class I subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for division and combination purposes, in order to separate the easterly 60 feet of Lot 5, Block 1, Abingdon Glen from said Lot 5 for combination with the aforesaid south 900.00 feet of the east 700.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3; and Page 1 of3 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed division will result in lots which remain conforming to the lot standards of the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the Class I subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for the applicants as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Edward J. Otto of Otto Associates Engineers and Land Surveyors, Inc. dated March 2, 1999 and attached to this resolution, subject to the following conditions: 1.Upon the approval of this division by the City Council, the applicants shall legally combine the east 60 feet of Lot 5, Block 1, Abingdon Glen witii the south 900.00 feet of the east 700.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 117, Range 23. 2.The applicants shall grant to the City a 10’ drainage and utility easement along the west side of the new dividing line within Lot 5, Block 1, Abingdon Glen, such easement to be executed prior to release of this subdivision for filing by the City Attorney. 3.Applicants shall provide confirmation of legal ownership of the property via title opinion or other form satisfactory to the City Attorney before the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement will be released for filing. 4.The aforesaid division shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before December 28,1999 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. 5.The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Page 2 of 3 1 i Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota this 28th day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 28th day of June, 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 3 0) > CO H- O (b COo H 4- •H +J L- 0) O «»t s I so s It % « 0} % 0U' ^ f *^S iC t/t M N ;o r/l ‘3S *vi /o i OO OOff 9frt *0W •H*V*S*0 ~r OOTfo. — ?.L w <I tl ^ I >* ‘a ^ ^ o 8 § > .8 fi S I 5! CQ XJ I I I I I 2* t I I _________________________________________________________J_________________ 000.-5 ViJTvor 'r V /o i M 'i r#5 /V r/l «A* rwi r/; J J iC !♦## OD/ ry?/ a* -. U C^Q^SiXaOON \ o7 :t • mmm 9 I 1 “ > 5m vi<« I r9 m.usaooN « .1 Jv w i I 1^ linv.# I M vj *. /1 11C V i 4-» M m ® %r 1«" -.i •^11 1 * * ••• c cc» o % •c:>c> CO r*«. Jl •H 4* ** O ^ iX .H .••"X m •cr c CJ 4 O CO U O) CO -S3CO CO & 2 CQ O -C . K* Car. C 4- C 3 C O E c o oc 4/ c»o M <U O a O *0 -q: Ssn a»c *1^ o £t O tfl 4* Oc 4^ X? o Jd u> 0/ c o o 0 uw 4> Cl 1 o c 4» XJ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 19,1999 (#247r13eorge Stlckney, continued) Stickney commented that it was their goal with this sutxiivision to preserve th^atural features of the property as n^^ as possible, noting that they will require a covenant that ai^ trees removed as part of the development will need to be replaced. Hawn inquired whe^r there were any public comments regarding this^piication. Pat Dougherty, Old C^y^al Bay Road, stated he has no particular ^culties with this proposed subdivision, but expresses concern over the amount of land d^loped to the north and the Increased water runoff proNems they have been experiencing ^ce that time. Dougherty requested that that issue be addressed? Stickney commented that he woi to correct the problem. be willing to review th/drainage to see if steps could be taken Weinberger stated City Staff would likelo see morewater runoff to the drainage pond. Stickney remarked that there will not be a effect with this subdivision. irse Moused on Lot 2 due to a covenant that will be in Lindquist commented that the Applicant sh^ld be aware that City Staff is recommending a ten foot easement in addition to the park dedication fee foNhis subdivision. Hawn noted that the City is not in pos^ssion of the smtic reports for this subdivision. Stickney stated that the septic ins^ctor has been out to ttte property and has not found any major Issues involving the septic. Sticimey remarked that it was n|s understanding that the reports had been submitted to the City and>ras not sure why the City do^ not have them at this time. Hawn inquired how frequent)/variances are given to lots that d^ot meet the 200 foot setback at the street. Weinberger stated that /ariances to street width are typically granted^n a cul-de-sac due to the fadt that if the lots we^required to meet the 200 foot street width, thah(he lots would not function well with the other lojs and would have an unusual configuration. Stoddard inqulred^^helher this was a subdivision or preliminary plat appro^l. Stickney statep it was a preliminary plat application. Stoddard inoved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Applicati^ #2477, 250 and^O Old Crystal Bay Road South, Class 111 Preliminary Plat Subdlvlsk to penm variances to the 200 foot street width for Lots 3,4, and 5, subject to condi^ons outlined In the April 19,1999 Planner's Report and the April 5,1999 CUy Engineer's report, and further subject to the incorporation of any recommendations by theONR and Hennepin County regarding the drainage into the final plat application. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 6. #2474 SUSAN WILSON, 325 BROWN ROAD SOUTH/251 0 ABINGDON WAY, LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT Page 5 \ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 19,1999 (#2474 Susan Wilson, continued) The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Steven and Susan Wilson, Applicants, were present.. Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting a lot line rearrangernerit to change the lot line 60 fep* to the west to have the trees located along the east property line on the 325 South Brown Road property, which would allow that lot to have platted access to the Luce Line Trail. The property located at 2150 Abingdon Way will continue to have two suitable septic sites that can meet the 20 foot setback requirement from the east property line. The rearranged lot line will not make either lot non-confoimlng for lot area or setbacks or change the existing building pads. City Stsff recommends epprovel of this sppllcetion subject to the property owner provIdlnQ d new 10 foot drainage easement along the new east property line for 2150 Abingdon Way as well as the other conditions outlined in the April 19,1999 Planner's Report. Mrs. Wilson commented that the land might be sold and they wanted to insure that the trees in that area will not be cut down. Smith noted that this was an unusual sltus'<on, but questioned whether the City would be running the risk of having other property owners construct alleys to other desirable locations. Weinberger stated the City has seen proposals similar to this requesting walkways down to Lake Minnetonka, but this Is the first application requesting a walkway to the Luce Line. Weinberger remarked that another alternative to preserving the trees would be to grant a conservation easement, but noted this lot line rearrangement Is really not creating a flag lot. There were no public comments. Lindquist commented he does not have a problem with this application. Schroeder inquired whether any variances were necessary with this application. Weinberger stated It was simply a lot line rearrangement and would not require any variances. 4 Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2474,325 Brown Road South/2510 Abingdon Way, Lot Line Rearrangement, with the understanding that a new 10 foot drainage easement along the new east property line for 2150 Abingdon Way will be required. VOTE; Ayes 6, Nays 0. Mr. Wilson Inquired whether they would be able to be put on the May 10th City Council agenda. Weinberger stated they would need to submit the existing and proposed legal descriptions, along with the new easements shown on the survey, by the end of next week Wednesday. Mr. Wilson requested that this Item be set on the May 24th City Council agenda. 7. #2479 Peter Andrea Co 7:41 p.m.-8:19 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affi Mark Gronberg, ArchUeeCwas present. DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this day of ^ 19_by and between hereinafter referred to as "Grantor(s)”, and the City of Orono, a municipal corporation, its employees, interests and assigns, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee”. WITNESS, THAT Grantor(s), in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration given by Grantee, the receipt of which is acknowledged by Grantor(s), do(es) hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement for drainage and utility purposes, including the right to construct and maintain the same, together with the right of the public for access over, above, under and across the land located in the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, legally described as follows: The east 10 feet of the following described property: That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Abingdon Glen, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota that lies west of the east 60.00 feet thereof In addition to any other remedy the Grantee may have, the covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. Grantor(s) covenant that they are in fee title to the above property, have a lawful right and authority to convey and grant this easement, and that the land is free from all encumbrances except: Grantor(s) have executed this document the day and year set forth above. GRANTOR(S) Page 1 of 2 1 r ■>: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______________. 19 ___, by________________ day of NOTARY PUBLIC State Deed Tax Due Hereon: This instrument was drafted by: City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Page 2 of 2 1 TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Staff April 9,1999 #2474 Steven and Susan Wilson 325 South Brown Road and 2150 Abingdon Way Lot Line Rearrangement—Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Lots Existing Proposed 325 South Brown Road 14.46 acres 15.32 acres 2150 Abingdon Way 4.98 acres total 2.25 acres wet 2.73 acres dry 2.55 acres dry contiguous 4.19 acres 2.02 acres wet 2.17 acres dry Exhibits:A B C D E F G Application Plat map Property Owner's list Topo Map Plat of Abingdon Glen Proposed Lot Line Rearrangement Consent Form Application: The applicant owns both lots and would like to change the lot line 60 ’ to the west to have the trees located along the east property line on the 325 South Brown Road property. This lot line will allow the South Brown Road lot to have platted access to the Luce Line Trail. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (B) RR-IB Standards & Chapter 11 (Subdivision Ordinance) # ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards ]^-lB District Standards Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard 2 acres 200'50’50'30' Subject Property Lot Area and Yards The rearranged lot line will not make either lot non-conforming for lot area or setbacks. The smaller lot, 2150 Abingdon Way, will continue to have two suitable septic sites that can meet the 20' setback requirement from the east property line. STAFF RECOMMENDATION To approve the lot line rearrangement, subject to the property owner providing the following information for filing with Hennepin County: 1. A new 1 O' drainage easement along the new east property line for 2150 Abingdon Way 2. A consent form for both properties if a mortgage is held on either property 3. A certificate of survey showing the new drainage easement with a signature block with the property owner's signature 4. It would also be helpful if the surveyor would put the following information on the certificate of survey for filing: total lot area total dry acres total wet acres total dry contiguous areas 5. A reduced copy at 1 "=200' for amending the City's section maps #2474 Steve and Susan Wilson 2150 Abingdon Way/525 South Brown Road Lot Line Rearrangement PC~April 19. 1999 page~2 ft Application # Date Received O— Amount Paid 350^^ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Amcm mi ^ V \ AT%TT^V\ ^ - I I - OUC auuicdd_____l ---------------------------- Property Identification Number (PID) 03"^ OCOQ Please check one - Property ____abstract or torrens?rlease cnecK one - rropeny_____auiuaci r luntua: Attach legal description to application. fy^l^ j ^ //§//U<S APPLICANT Name ^ (x)//S/>^y/t^ Address"S- City /jfAJ> C3 • h. 1^)1 k,A-^ Phone (home) OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ___________ Zip 5<^r<^Phone (work) nsiEicr Address City Zip (attach list if more than one) Phone (home) Phone (work) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units__I Other (specify)_________ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Vi ____ Division for Tax Purposes X Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) ____ Subdivision for New Building Sites ____/ Existing Units n New Units / ___Total Units <yr^x.'i Number of Building Sites q 3 •. * "y} Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per ___Acres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Pajinent of fees (refer to "application fees" listed below. 2. Completed application form. 3. Preliminary plat information on Certificate of Survey. 4. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350’ (v ou must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Gov^ Centei^348-327n:) 5. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Zoning Official’s Signature ________________________________________ Date_________________________________ MINIMUM ^UTER1AL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FINAL APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (refer to Preliminary Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Zoning Official’s Signature ________________________________________ Date__________________________________ I. APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check pC] those which apply) A. Application Base Fees: Totals Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) S250.00 _______ X Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $350.00 _____ Subdivision Application (Class I & II) $350.00 ______ _____ Preliminary Subdivision Application $375.00 + S25.00/lot (Class III & all non-residential) _______ _____ Final Plat Application (Class III) $200.00 ___ _____ Legal Review and Filing; ______Subdivision only $75.00 ______ _____Subdivision w/easements and covenants min. $200.00 ______ _____ Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) ______ _____ Legal and Engineering Review Fees (as incurred) ______ _____ Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change from original application) ______ _____ Renewal of Class 111, Preliminary Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change from original application) ______ _____ Renewal of Final Class III Subdivision Application $ 150.00 (No change from original application) ______ B. Special Improvement Fees: _____ Proposed Private Roads $600.00+ $.50/lineal ft.;_____lin. ft. x .50 = $______ ______ _____ Proposed Public Roads $900.00+ $. 50/lineal ft.;______lin. ft. x.50 = $______ ______ _____ Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $900.00 ______ _____ Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.00 + $25/stub ______ _____ Proposed Watermain Extension $250.00 + $25/stub ______ _____ Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) $200.00 _______ _____ On-Site System, Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $50.00/pcr lot X_____new lots ______ C. Flexible Application Fees/Misc. Fees _____ Variance $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) _______ _____ Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision $ 100.00 ______ _____ PRD Application with Subdivision $30.00/Dwclling Unit ---------- The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, Cit>- Engineer, Cit>' Attorney, luncil nccessan’ to process Owner’s Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the Cit>' Office 25 days before the Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Mondav of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Plaruiing Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arraigemcnts to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meetmg oS'n7-z>-2.'*- I (17) (16) (18) TO.OI % 4S.O iU9KI6VIEt!9 (8) ?4T5S (15) I3I.T4 a 9 (13) rn.fi (COLIM OR) ! 29.01 19. M I Otft.cf 8 ^WTIJT A P (18) « (19) ^ » H* S0»*44*4«'*0 (12) ^ (17) SW*44*4r*>*o^ 40 0? 141.77 V' ?r* n«.2S 4/^*^ 1^ • k ■ to ^ji kv*«««tok«to»kk««k^«*Jiifilililvv4S%\V4>%y6^vv'.*4'.\v.%*«■•■«««•« iOO tLMM. m fl « k « « «_• •• • • • ■ w m • c to^ir• v • k^» • to• «•»«««« • V ^XunOO* ■*kktok««tf 4 4^k k k • to K * w 'MjrKjf v^kkktokkkk• ■ to «••«*#« ^ 4mm9*999» • m »*•*«*• m^0 •*• «••«■»#•• • • • # • • • # 9 *• • « • ^ •% • *to*•*k*"*«*p*«* • **4*#*4'«*»'*p"»*«***k*0"*^»*«***« •*:k«k>4afl0««*400»Pk««kkk»***« «•«»«•■*• • • ••^J4««p««»«to«*ka' _ _. .. aktokkAkkaaktotokakakAkkakakk^ ^ to -_f aA*kkkrPkP4toP0a00kPk»«04*am jIU^^C • fltokPPtoakk^PktoPPaaPktfaak • •««■«» to to toto«»p*toto %!j****V"to*»*«*«"»"*^* ''^<:iy:'X'X- fe » 4 • • • M • • » * • * ••«•••••• ••tokk^totoktoaktaaaafl**a a a a r a afa • w 0 9 • aaaaaa^aa catoaaatkkaraaAaaasaa. a ^«ak«aPto«a4ak4*k«akatoN •'/.•.ycivTv.y.’.v’a a « k ^4 “ a «toaca.a_a«aaaa • atoaltotoatoaaaaatotoaaaaa .•.•.•.•V.'.’.V/.'.'.'rV.'.’.'.*.*. • • * • <• ' • ’^'WWW.W* • • • • « a a a • a a a a j a p a. to a a a a a a a:x->:a a a a a a a a • to k a a a a • to to a aa a a a * .’.V.\* :\-:x a toto’aaato actototoa 0 a a a a to a" ^to^^* *a* «*a*to*a*« to*a*a'^a* to*a^to^r^ t'.'.'4'.*.y.*.’.*X*r*^/X'X*!-Ia a « • a ar • aaaaaavaaatoaa k • • a a toaakatoatototototoato to a a a jr a aiatoaatoatoaaatoto ktoaatoA'^toto**^*^******* to a to ajto to a to .to a to a a to • a a a a "to* »fa i*a*a*to*a*a"to*a"to*a"to*a*to*to*a*-^a* a a aaatotoaatoatovaatoa* ‘ * * vX*X*a a a a to a to a to a to a to to r a to a a% a to a to to to a to • • a a a a a a — an a • o5-n7-«-i3 TQto 11 3tol 13 *♦. . T U \ __________________f 9? ^toa'^'ira ^33 * a (10) %n ]( 3 *00 9BI as 0 ** P 4«2 ounr • «; 5> I loT C59*w\e<MT' (S) dHD I '”• j ► ^ -------- j- \. • *141 u >#*»J itt-s 4t :«)!} : *1 H^ M ni i Vti:rt noi /■’ i'N £C:5:£D v;^ I? •♦ Cf I’.fC-VATICN \Tt. ro s:aT£ RUN DATE 03/16/99 lATCN 507 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI4S5401 PAGE 28 PROP ADDR miNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR owner NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER WANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 03-117-23 13 0001 00350 BROWN RD S W F FARLEY I K 0 FARLEY WXLLIAN t KATHLEEN FARLEY 350 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0002 00300 BROWN RD S JOHN C DOUTHIT ETAL JOHN C DOUTHIT 300 S BROWN RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0003 00038 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED LONGRXDGE ASSOCIATES L0N6RXDGE ASSOCIATES 15407 NCGINTY RD W WAYZATA NN 55391 38 03-117-23 13 0005 01995 FOX RIDGE RD R ft B HACK RAYMOND N HACK 1995 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0010 01950 FOX RIDGE RD D S PHELPS ft E D PHELPS DAVID S ft ELLEN D PHELPS 1950 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 03-117-23 13 0011 01960 FOX RIDGE RD LUCIA T NORISON LUCIA T NORISON 1960 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 03-117-23 21 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE OF MINN STATE OF NINN fDNRI (LUCE LINE TRAIL) 38 03-117-23 21 0010 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED WILLIAM F HARTFIEL JR ET AL WILLIAM F ft HELEN C HARTFIEL 2225 DEVIN LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 21 0012 02225 DEVIN LA W F HARTFIEL ft H C HARTFIEL WILLIAM F ft HELEN C HARTFIEL 2225 DEVIN LA LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 03-117-23 21 0021 00185 BROWN RD S C ft J KR06NESS CHARLES ft JEAN KR06NESS 185 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 03-117-23 21 0022 00195 BROWN RD S J E ft B A ELDER JANES E ft BARBARA A ELDER 195 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 03-117-23 22 0008 02250 LONGVIEW CIR N F ft N V F TORRISON NORMAN F TORRISON 2250 LONGVIEW CIRCLE LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 03-117-23 23 0008 02255 ABINGDON WAY F ft C STINCHFIELD FREDERICK/CHERYL STINCHFIELD 3058 MINNEHAHA CT WAYZATA NN 55391 38 03-117-23 23 0009 02240 ABINGDON WAY M F SWXONTKOWSKI ET AL NARC F SWINOTKOWSKI ft BETH E SWXONTKOWSKI 2240 ABINGDON WAY LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 ?3 0013 00038 ADORES . JfUSSlGNED ABINGDON GLL ..>0 ABINGDON GLEL ASSN C/0 RESIDENT C 2340 ABINGDON WAY LONG LAKE NN 55356 ) \ 38 03-117-23 24 0003 00325 BROWN RD S C S ft S D WILSON C STEVEN ft SUSAN 0 WILSON 325 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 03-117-23 24 0004 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C S ft S D WILSON C STEVEN ft SUSAN D WILSON 325 BROWN RD S Lom LAKE NN 55356 38 03-117-23 24 0005 02205 ABINGDON WAY R B BRUCE ft C K BRUCE R B BRUCE ft C K BRUCE 2205 ABINGOm WAY LONG LAKE NN 55356 •deceived M4R P 2 OUYVh OftOiVO RUN DATE 03/16/«9 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATION SYSTEH PROPERTY ONNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 29 MTCN 507 PROP A1 ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 03-117-23 24 0094 02150 ABINGDON WAY C S 8 S D WILSON C STEVEN I SUSAN D WILSON 325 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55354 38 03-117-23 24 0007 02180 ABINGDON WAY T C DEVRIES 8 6 W DEVIRES TINOTHY C 8 GAYLE W DEVRIES 2180 ABINGDON WAY LONG LAKE NN 55354 38 03-117-23 24 0008 00255 BROWN RD S NAR6ARET P COST HAR6ARET P COST 255 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55354 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 03-117-23 24 0009 00245 BROWN RD S A 8 P KEARNEY III ET AL ADRIAN A 8 PANELA H KEARNEY 245 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55354 TOTAL BATCH 507 00022 ■'4 CM X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REFRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AM) TRUE REFRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS XT AFPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEFARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO TNE BEST OF NY KN0WLED6E AND BELIEF. ^ : 5 '^1* » 1 o • 163.7 962.2 9S0 960 9^0 .'X . .♦. > 'L > ’^ \' h 960 71. 983.9 / \933.8 X K 35.3 ^\\ \ / ScAk r - Y 3i Q\VV:V.‘Ji'* \ 24.57 f\€.Vi lof D»L) 4)0'xMOO' {t> j>^ 32X 5. lA t c. C'‘. i 0-* C *i‘ i T? - - »' ««> f r c T FROM POFKA.M HAIK ET AL (MON) ll. 25’ 96 I2:ll/ST. I2:l0.4i0. 'iUWii'il'l F 2 CONSENT Gr The undersigned ("Mortgagee") having an interest as mortgagee in the property described in the foregoing ____• (the "_______*’)» pursuant to that certain Mortgage dated ■ '' . 19_^, filed_________• 19 _vrith the County Rccordcr/Registrar of Titles In and for Hennepin County. Minnesota as Document No.. ■ (the "Mortgage ”), hereby consents to the subordinate to the __ and further agrees that the Mortgage is subject and granted in the IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Consent to be executed effective as of _________________» 1996. I Mortgagee STATE OF COUNTY OF ) ) ) ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on____ the ____________________of .. 199.. by under the laws of . on behalf of the Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: ApplicftiAV Acfldj -piwidc •ftfIK U « r»^oi4^ay ok Cl|or»3 wi4K a Opinion addifesx^ *4lu CiKi The of •lha M lil»e 5V100U alsa include267/22126353 11/20/56 blocK* new C|ve«i(i4i<|c/plil*Vu €Asgtnguls. r • Application Date: Completion Date: 120-day Limit: 3/17/99 3/17/99 7/17/99 COUNCIL MEETING JUN 2 fi 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cu Y Uf UHUNU DATE: June 25, 1999 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Michael P. GafTron Title Senior Planning Coordinator I / ^ Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2477 George W. Stickney, 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South - Preliminary Plat Approval - 8 Lot Subdivision - Resolution Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) Application: The applicant has proposed an 8 lot subdivision of this 20.21 acre property located at 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road. The subdivision includes two existing residential sites located north of the Luce Line Trail and east of Old Crystal Bay Road. List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Preliminary Plat Drawing C - Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan D - May 28,1999 City Engineer Comments E - May 10,1999 Council Minutes F - DNR letters of 4-15-99 and 6-18-99 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission on April 19 recommended on a 6-0 vote to approve the preliminary plat subject to a number of conditions which are contained in the resolution attached for your review. May 9 Council Action On May 9, at the request of staff. Council tabled this item pending review of the revisd plans which were received shortly prior to that meeting. Staff had a number of concerns relating primarily to stormwater management and the extent of City-designated wetlands on the plat. #2477 - George Stickney June 25, 1999 Page 2 Review of Various Topics Stormwater Pond on Lot 2 A stormwater pond will be established on Lot 2 behind the existing residence. This pond will treat a majority of the added runoff caused by the new private road. Due to topography of the site, runoff from most of the new residences cannot be collecetd in a single pond on site, hence vegetated buffer strips will be preserved within each lot for stormwater quality enhancement. Stormwater Ponding in Wetland Adjacent to Luce Line A 1.6 acre wetland in Lots 5 and 6 adjacent to the Luce Line, is the receiving body for most runoff from the site. This wetland outlets under the Luce Line via an old 36" culvert. The draft Orono Stormwater Plan indicates this should be reduced to 18" diameter to protect downstream properties. Applicant has agreed to do this and has submitted a preliminary design plan, subject to DNR approval. This plan will result in a slight increase in the wetland elevation at times, and this is a concern of the DNR as it could inundate the horse trail next to the Luce Line. Applicant proposes to raise the horse trail with fill, which has received a conceptual approval from DNR subject to acceptable design details. DNR also requests that the City be responsible for maintenance of the drainage structures, even though we may require the homeowners association to maintain them. This is an item for discussion. The 18" culvert will raise the 100-year flood elevation to just above 966', which could have a minor temporary impact on two septic sites unless a low berm or other measures are established. This will have to be detailed prior to final plat approval. Wetland Designation The City has received a wetland delineation report and has concluded that all wetlands delineated along the Luce Line by applicant's consultant, are part of the designated City wetland and will not be creditable as dry buildable. This has resulted in some adjustments of the road location and a few lot lines, but has not impacted drainfield sites. However, filling the horse trail will likely result in filling of a small portion of the wetland adjacent to the trail, as will the establishment of the new outlet structure. Staff recommends that a variance be granted for this minor filling of wetland, subject to approval of the appropriate agencies. Rnad I.avout As a result of the wetland designations, the road layout has shifted slightly northward in a somewhat tighter curve than code allows. Staff is recommending a variance to allow curve radii of 225' at the west end and 200' near the mid point of the road where 275' would normally be required for a 30 mph design private road. This variance is justified because this is a short cul-de-sac serving only 8 homes, with no future potential to be a through road. r #2477 - George Stickney June 25,1999 Page 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plat subject to the conditions in the resolution. It appears to staff that all remaining issues to be resolved prior to final plat approval will not impact the lot layout. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED After discussion of any outstanding issues, including any concerns raised by the DNR, adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. A Rev6-25-99 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A CLASS III SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 250 AND 340 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH CRYSTAL BAY PRESERVE FILE NO. 2477 WHEREAS, George W. Stickney (hereinafter the ''subdivider") on March 17,1999, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of an eight (8) lot residential plat of property legally described as: Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 229, Hennepin County, Minnesota, And that part of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 229, lying southerly of a line drawn parallel with and 240 feet southerly, as measured at right angles to the North line of said Lot 1, and lying westerly of a line drawn parallel with, and 1070 feet easterly as measured at right angles, to the West line of said Lot 1 (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance vsrith Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the Municipal Code of Ordinances, Chapter 10 (Zoning Code) and Chapter 11 (Subdivision), the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 19,1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council initially reviewed this application on May 10, 1999 and again at their regular meeting held on June 28, 1999 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application, noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the RR-IB One Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The subdivision is located over two existing residential sites located at 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South. The entire site is approximately 20.21 acres, with 1.64 acres as designated wetland and 18.57 acres dry buildable. Page 1 of 9 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. The proposed plat consists of eight residential lots each meeting or exceeding the two acre minimum ••equirement for the zoning district. Lots 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8 meet all lot standards for lot width and lot area, and have demonstrated adequate building sites. Lots 3, 4 and 5 front on the proposed cul-de-sac and do not meet the defined minimum 200' lot width requirement as measured at the rear line of the defined front yard. Lot 3 has a defined lot width of 130', Lot 4 has a defined lot width of 115' and Lot 5 has a defined lot width of 130'. However, the granting of a lot width variance for each lot is justified by the fact Lots 3, 4 and 5 contain suitable building sites meeting all requirements without the need for further variances. Lot 1 The front lot line for each lot is the common boundary with Outlot A, the private road outlot. Lots 1 and 8 are located adjacent to Old Crystal Bay Road South. The side yard adjacent to the street for Lots 1 and 8 has an established setback of 50'. These two lots shall not have any direct access to Old Crystal Bay Road. All eight lots shall be served by a private road designated on the plat as Outlot A. Proposed lot 2 contains an existing residence that is intended to remain on the site. A bam and storage building are located to the east of the residence. The storage building is located within the required yard setbacks or over the property line. The bam and storage building shall be removed upon completion of the plat. The subdivider intends to remove both buildings. The property located at 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South contains a residence, garage and a storage building, all of which shall be removed from Lots 7 and 8. The proposed private road to be constructed in Outlot A is 700' in length length is allowed for roads ending in a cul-de-sac. The platted Outlot A cul-o^-..uC (100') and road (50') meet established standards for width in the Subdivision Ordinance. The minimum required horizontal radius for private roads in Orono is Page 2 of9 12. 14. 15. 16. 275'. The proposed road in Outlot A will have two radii of 200' and 225' respectively, which requires a variance from the Subdivision Code. This variance is justified by the fact this is a relatively short cul-de-sac road with no future 'through street' possibility. The variance is required based on the location of the existing house which will remain on Lot 2. Private residential streets serving eight units are required minimum paved width of 28' and the cul-de-sac is to be paved with a 40' radius. Construction standards are established in the Subdivision Ordinance in Section 11.33, Subdivision 4. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along all right-of-ways and along all perimeter lot lines. 13. The proposed location of the intersection with Old Crystal Bay Road South directly across from Deer Run Trail has been approved by the Director of Public Services. Two septic sites have been identified on each lot. The soil testing and plam> completed by DH Excavating, dated March 31,1999, has been reviewed by Staff and conditionally approved, subject to applicant providing some additional information as specified in the Septic Review report dated May 6, 1999. The large parcel located to the east of the subdivision is owned by the Department of Natural Resources. The DNR has not stated they would be requesting any aecess to the property over the private road. No access is necessary to the south for connection to the Luce Line Trail. The property to the north has been developed into single family homes. No future connections to the north are required for the Crystal Bay Preserve subdivision. A stormwater management NURP pond is proposed to be located on Lot 2. Lot 2 is 2.9 acres in area. The area containing the pond shall not be included in the dry buildable area for the lot. The final plat should designate the pond as a drainage easement and adjust the lot area if necessary to accommodate the NURP pond. 17. A large Orono wetland is located over Lots 5,6 and 7. A Flowage and Conservation Easement is necessary to protect the wetland from future development and to preserve existing vegetation. Page 3 of 9 18. a) The applicant has proposed a stonnwater management plan which will include stormwater ponding on Lot 5 to provide for stormwater detention and treatment. The City Engineer has recommended reducing the size of the outlet pipe located under the Luce Line Trail. Reducing the size of the outlet pipe will reduce the rate of storm water downstream but will increase the temporary high water level of the wetland during storm events. b) Part of this plan will involve raising the elevation of the horse trail portion of the Luce Line, located just north of the main Trail, and may involve filling a small portion of designated wetland within the plat and within the Luce Line Trail. Such filling will require additional detailed review prior to final plat approval; it would be approoriate to grant a variance for this minor wetland filling. The City Engineer, DNR, and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District shall review the Final Plans prior to final plat approval. c) The City Engineer has also recommended the establishment of vegetated buffer strips on each lot to provide additional runoff filtration, since not all runoff from development of the site will be treated by the stormwater pond. 19. The Park Commission reviewed the application on April 5,1999 and recommended the applicant dedicate additional land to move the existing bike trail further from Old Crystal Bay Road. When the trail was built an easement was not granted resulting in the trail being located next to the road. Therefore, a 10 foot trail easement should be dedicated along the west edge of the property. This trail easement should be located over the 10* drainage and utility easement, and therefore shall not reduce the creditable lot area for Lots 1 and 8. 21. The Planning Commission reviewed the application on April 19, 1999 and recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0 to approve the eight lot subdivision of Crystal Bay Preserve. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat of Crystal Bay Preserve for George W. Stickney at 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South per preliminary plat drawings by Mark S. Gronberg, a licensed surveyor of Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. dated March 17, Page 4 of 9 1999, revised June 22, 1999 subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. A variance will be granted for width of Lots 3,4 and 5 which do not meet the 200' width requirement for the RR-IB zoning district. All Lots shall access to the private road in Outlot A. No direct access to Old Crystal Bay Road shall be allowed for any Lot. All existing accesses to Old Crystal Bay Road shall be removed prior to City final approval of the private road construction. The private road in Outlot A shall be constructed to City private road requirements, subject to a Developers Agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Private road construction can begin as soon as the engineerii'g plans for the road as well as stormwater management plans have been approved by the City and the Developers Agreement has been executed. A variance will be granted for the two radii of the private road at 200' and 225'. Private road access shall be from Old Crystal Bay Road subject fo conditions for such access to be approved by the Director of Public Services. The private road shall be privately owned and maintained per the appropriate access easement/maintenance documents to be executed by the developer. The developer shall create a homeowners association for such ownership and maintenance. No building permits will be issued until the private road is completed and all stormwater management improvements have been completed by the developer and approved by the City. The developer shall grant to the City an underlying Road and Utilities Easement for Outlot A. 8. The developer shall grant Drainage and Utility easements 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along all right-of-ways and along perimeter lot lines. Page 5 of 9 9. 10. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. The bam and storage building located on Lot 2 shall be removed prior to issuance of any building permits in the subdivision. The existing buildings located on Lot 7 shall be removed prior to issuance of any building permits within the subdivision. 11. Subdivider shall plant boulevard trees along the private road per the requirements of Section 11.60, Subdivision 2. Subdivider shall construct stormwater management improvements to be shown on the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan to be submitted with the final plat application. A final Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan must be approved by the City Engineer prior to final plat approval. Subdivider shall grant drainage easements over all drainageways and stormwater ponds with the plat. Subdivider shall provide supportive drainage calculations and deEne vegetated buffer strips within each lot, such strips intended to provide additional filtration of runoff prior its leaving the site, and such strips to be maintained with grasses in an unmowed state. A variance will be granted for the minor wetland filling which will occur in order to raise the horse trail and establish a new wetland outlet. Subdivider is hereby advised that the City will not grant final plat approval until the MC^T) has approved all grading and drainage improvements for the property. All identified primary and alternate sewage system drainfield sites within the subdivision shall be fenced prior to any land alterations, and such fencing shall remain inplace until such time that each Lot is developed. Subdivider shall develop covenants for each lot for protection of drainfield sites within each Lot. Covenants shall include protection for alternate septic sites along with site plans locating both primary and alternative sites. The covenant shall alert future property owners of the need to protect identified sites. Applicant shall submit additional testing on soils found to have a seasonal water table at less than one foot due to eroded topsoil. Complete designs for the primary drainfield sites on each lot must be submitted and approved prior to final plat approval. Each drainfield site must be located on the survey to assure setbacks to property lines, wetlands and the NURP pond. A berm or other protective measure Page 6 of 9 shall be designed into the sites which may be affected by the 100-year flood. 17. The applicant shall abandon the existing septic site located on the 340 Old Crystal Bay Road property with application for demolition permit for the existing residence. 18. Payment of Park Dedication Fee for Lots 1 and 3 thru 7 per City Ordinance. Lots 2 and 8 are considered to contain existing residences and are not subject to the Park Dedication Fee. 19. Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire one year from the date of Council preliminary plat approval. Should the subdivider fail to file a final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals shall be submitted to the City two (2) weeks prior to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting: 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"=200'. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines per survey by Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. dated March 17,1999. B. Designation on the plat of all drainage easements, drainage and utility easements, and wetland boundaries. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: A. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B. The applicant shall provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. Page 7 of9 i 3. C. Signed and executed Drainage Easement over all drainageways, and Conservation and Flowage Easement over all designated wetlands. D. Signed and executed Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit. E. Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over Outlot A. F.Signed and executed covenants defining responsibility for construction and maintenance for Outlot A, defining future fmancial obligations. G. H. Completed application for private road name. Signed and executed covenants for protection of drainfieid sites, including a map defining the location of the drainfieid sites. I. J. Vegetated buffer drainage easement including a map defining said easements. Signed and executed Trail Easement over the west 10' of Lots 1,8, and Outlot A. FEES TO BE PAID: A. Final plat fee: $200.00. B. Legal review and filing fee: $200.00. C. Park Dedication Fee 6 new lots x $4,900 = $29,400. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 28th day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 8 of 9 i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 28th day of June 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 9 of 9 V) ^ipi ^lioi IpOJOUBl 30> W01“CM(«^ PUDI tjaMiietg |uuo)mm n nijjoo **5St L d«-Zl-rC lo^ro^dl SfSaSSM nM M> >1 At oitfvtfiiM tv«CaIv^>M >»ru UUIVMt iUIMO Atw ■myi.-txrmjt '.'■•i&i jfJWKiWtC «» t«t • < I a w a ^ — 1. 8 w nti ii&!4 -58 III • I ?il \\ \\ m Si ; f «eres9^ ^ 1°° %I I \~V.'. ^W^'V, ....lu I \ 1 .4 X // /’i\ ••■/.■•'lA / • )IS' \] %•. * • III I—^ '• . J • \ .i!*" /'" iV ' */.L'.''___— • • • . \ • ----tm-n ••., \ lllj \ i: I; 9SCSS SJWUDU *0NI .Ua *. - w»> -3, mA I: !, •OM •l6-9« [Q^rodid JJJ77 vimtn imxnm MUSMSL IMt'VIl fi O >- O'-!2£^S| N_ ^ ^ ^ m .^. w 8. z O X o 3* 2 K § Z< _J o < ^ I— liJ LU P-, >“ Z — 8 o •■— Ir if.p 4 i'i I 1If !| fUiff ’, ll; ilJ3-* H in i »3r|5S2 tJ5 £i b 6 8 1-^ rresj 3 ^oo.oo.oo s io :• • • • • •5 « ^ • • •-♦«l \-.W rvodx)i^i 3-00 .60.00SVv ; I ;\ r-----. ‘aL V * I M %•««»•• •• MM •• I <•'' / • '■ ! 'V.y-«'' ■‘ '#'■ V . • / ,' . /y ' \ HWiSji: vt/.* Vr i\ V. '* S"M / 4 •/; / IS' c, i ~ I ? I • ■ it 9t t *9^ I *. .-V V \*' I * ''\ •. ’.\ \ V/ ■• V-. \\ . -.A .1 • ' \... » . V. \ I ../•:. M .-r' : .; « - ' i--—___ •—.r.***: -'•» I $ •* . . •»• % ^ I Bonestroo l^osene mn ■ Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Arch.itects May 28,1999 Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderlik find Associates, tnc. Is an Affirmative Action/Bquat Opportunity Bmptoyer Principals: Otto G Bonestroo. PE. • Joseph C Anderlik. PE. • Marvin L Sorvala. P£. • Glenn R. Cook. PE. • Robert G Schunicht. PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. • Robert W. Rosene. PE. Richard E Turner, PE. and Susan M Eberlin. C PA.. Senior Consultants Associate Principals. Howard A. Sanford. PE • Keith A Gordon. PE • Robert R Pfefferle. PE • Richard W. Foster. PE. • David O Loskota. PE • Robert C. Russek. A.I.A. • Mark A. Hansoa PE. • Michael T. Rautmann. PE. • Ted K Field. PE. • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolfs. PE. • Sidney P. Williamson. PE. I S. • Robert F. Kotsmith • Agnes M Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE. Offices: Si. Paul. Rochester. Willmar and St. CIcud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl Website: www bonestroo com Mr. Paul Weinberger Assistant Zoning Adminisu^ator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 •Pill u ~ Re:Crystal Bay Preserve File No. 139-2477 E)ear Paul: We have reviewed the preliminary grading and drainage plan for the proposed Crystal Bay Preserve eight- lot subdivision. The site is located east of Old Crystal Bay Road and north of the Luce Line Trail in the in the northeast quarter of Section 23. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. The proposed NURP pond location and calculations appear acceptable. We recommend the pond have a rip rapped emergency overflow at an elevation of 983. The overflow should be located near the propos^ pond outlet. The proposed NURP pond will only treat runoff from most of Lot 2 and the roadway. Stormwater from the remaining Lots will flow overland to the existing ditches and wetland. We recommend installing a vegetated buffer strip along the backside of all Lots. The buffer strips should be sized to provide water quality for runoff prior to flows reaching the existing ditches and wetland. Our 4/5/99 comments incorrectly recmnmended reducing the existing wetland outlet from 36-inches to 27-inches. The City ’s draft Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) recommends this outlet be restricted to an 18-inch diameter outlet rather than 27-indies. The corresponding 10 and 100-year water levels in the wetland would be 963.4 and 966.3 respectively. The MnDNR has indicated that revised wetland water levels may conflict with the Luce Line Trail elevations just south of the site. Plans should be submitted to the DNR for their review. Some berming may be required between the wetland and the septic sites on Lot 6 to protect tliese sites. • Erosion conuoi uteasurcs should be sliovm ou the plans to protcv. ail wetlands and drainugeways erosion control should be in place prior to any gra^g and until vegetatitxi has been established. A ASW Please contact me at 651-604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MINI 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 ■ Fax; 651-636-1311 I: ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 10,1999 (#3 James'i^nckeDS, continued) Jabbour said he abstain if the matter is re-opened. . Flint explained his opihiDn that access to the property should b^om Crystal Creek Roid. • Kelley said there should norhe any discussion on this^ the neighbors have not been notified. (tter if it will be re-opened because Flint moved, Kelley seconded, a lotion t^i4-open #2466 for James Renckens and John Winston, 3020 Watertown Road - Pi'elimmaiy Plat Application and table the matter for itti/ tffWA^a Jabbour asked if the applicants^^d object WvAe matter being tabled for two weeks. Winston said they have iMfwth staff and they areV^g to continue to work with staff. They are willing to po^^one it for two weeks and works^vith staff in the interim. They would like to have it re-opeiied. Sansevere said^t^t Renckens told him that at the April 12th m^t|^, the Council received misinform^m and there were some inaccurate comments made tMts^ight that might have affected^e way the Council members voted. voir?* Ay« 3, Nays 0. (Jabbour and Peteraon^lj&tamejL)------------------------------- (#4) #2477 GEORGE W. STICKNEY, 250 AND 340 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - PRELIMINARY PLAT George Stickney, applicant, and Mark Gronberg were present. Weinberger presented the staff report. He said the applicant has proposed an ei^t lot subdivision on the east side of Crystal Bay Road just north of the Luce Line Trail. The property is located in the RR-IB, single family residential district, two-acre minimum lot size. He said staff was presented a new plan today regarding the NURP pond in relation to the wedand delineadon report The NURP pond was to be located on Lot 5. It is proposed to be moved to Lot 2. Staff is concerned that a NURP pond in that area will not handle the drainage from the entire site which is the intent of the NURP pond. Since staff just received the proposal, there has not been time for the City Engineer to review the plan and drainage calculadons have not been delivered to the City. Weinberger said that Ae City Engineer should have an opportunity to review the plan, especially since it will involve proposed culverts and other ways of piping the water into the wedand. Weinberger said there is also an issue regarding whether the entire wetland area should be considered against lot area because the Type 1 and 2 wedands are an extension of the Orono wedands. Weinberger said that the Page 4 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 10,1999 (#4 George W. Stickney, continiied) DNR also needs time to review the new plan. Another issue is the request for a 10-foot easement for a bike trail. • • ' * • . . . .*** * • * . ' . . • *• . Kelley asked where the culvert underneath the Luce Line is located. f • Weinberger showed the location of the culvert Kelley said he finds it hard to believe that the culvert is not located in the wetland. He said that water flow is a major issue for this property. Gronberg said that the wetland delineator went back to the property after the growing season started and marked off the wetlands. He said there is the same situation on the Old Crystal Bay addition to the north where there are two different types of wetlands. He said in Ae.past, tiie policy has been to place an easement over the Orono wetlands, drainage easements over drcunage ways and then write additional easements to cover the other wetlands, but they are filed as a separate document. Jabbour said that staff would like to have additional time to figure out if the proposal will adequately handle the surface water drainage. Jabbour asked why staff just received this information. Weinberger said that the City just received the report from the wetland delineator. Stickney said that John Anderson had done the wetlands off from the best aerial photos and wetland maps that are available to the City. His report now says that most of the wetlands are Type 1 and 2 which are walkable wetlands. Jabbour said that staff is having a problem determining if the drainage is adequate and the City Engineer has not had a chance to look at it. He asked if the applicants would object to tabling &e matter for two weeks. Elizabeth Hawn, Planning Commission Representative, said she is concerned about the City taking an easement instead of fee title for the bike trail because the property owner may be . liable if there is an accident on the bike trail. City Attorney Barrett said he feels the property owner would not be liable because it is a City casement and a City constructed trail, but he can look at it further and give the Council an opinion. Page 5 ORONO cmr council meeting MINUTES FOR MAY 10,1999 (#4 George W. Stickney, continued) Sansevere said that his property extends into the road in front of his property. He said that maybe the Council needs to have a. clear understanding that any homeowners with trails or roads on their property will not have any liability. Gronberg said that on the property to the north, the City has an easement for the bike trail. Jabbour sdd that staff wants to make sure the water moves. Kelley said the water should move at the same rate that it moves now and it should not increase the flowage to the pipe underneath the Luce Line. Gaf&on said he wants to make sure the City is consistent on the issue of how much of the wetlands is usable as dry buildable credit. He said there is no question that wetland delineators have found individual basms that have been noted as a covenant and given the owner credit for area, but he is not sure it is appropriate when the City’s maps show wetland areas that are larger than the ones delineated that he has deleted on the City’s 1975 inventory maps, to make those smaller and then have Types 1 and 2 around it. Gaffron’s impression is that the City would expand the boundary of the regulated wetland to encompass the entire areas of Types 1, 2 ^d 7. Kelley would like the City Engineer to review the plan before the Council takes any action. Gaffron said that two weeks should be sufficient to review the issues. Stickney said he feels the subdivision is very well designed, Jabbour asked the City Attorney to review the issue. Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to table #2477 for George Stickney, 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South, PreUminary Plat for Crystal Bay Preserve, for hvo weeks. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 6 Flint stated the Council should not spend a lot of time worrying about the easement versus fee title on the trail. He feels the City’s position should be that the property owner can do it either way. He said that typically the property owner wants the easement so he can count the property towards the minimum lot size. He said there are many casements for roads and trails . . in the City, but the City cannot cover the risk by their insurance. 4 ' • i(ni UJ 'O, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Region 6A Trails & Waterways, 9925 Valley View Road, ' I |v'•') Eden Prairie, MN 55344. Office (612) 826-6764; (Fax) 826-6767, j . June 18,1999 City of Orono Paul Weinberger PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Weinberger, This letter addresses concerns regarding George Stickney’s application to the City of Orono Planning Commission for a Class 111 subdivision for property located at 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South. Please include this letter in the project file documenting the state’s concerns. The State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources, Trails & Waterways Unit manages the Luce Line State Trail on the south side and the Wakefield-Conry Rest Area on the east side of the Stickney property. The main concern is that the proposed development does not adversely effect the water drainage along the state trail or adjoining state property. There are several specific concerns regarding the Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan dated June 9, 1999. This plan proposes extending an 18" culvert from the existing 36" culvert under the Luce Line Trail to the Stickney property and constructing a catch basin on the private property. The developer has been made aware that the existing 36" culvert under the main treadway of the Luce Line Trail is original to the railroad construction. This culvert will need to be replaced by the developer. The DNR will continue to own and maintain all culverts on state property. The proposed elevation of the rim of the catch basin is to be at 966.3 fi, which is the calculated 100 year flood level. Currently, the elevation of the horse trail treadway of the Luce Line Trail ranges from 960.5 to 964 on the southern border of the development. The developer has agreed to raise the horse trail treadway to an elevation of 967 ft. Detailed plans of the grading, slopes, treadway dimensions, and type of material proposed for the horse trail will need to be submitted to the DNR, Trails & Waterways Unit, for final project review and approval. DNR Information: 612-296-61.S7. l-800-766-6(KK) • TTY: 6l2-2y6-.S4S4, I ■SOO-6.S7-3929 An Equal Opponuniiy Employer Who Valuer Diversity 0% Primed ‘m Recycled Paper Containing a Min ilium ol IlFi Pu\t-Consumer Wj^te • i I r The developer has indicated that the invert elevation of the existing 36” culvert is 956.7 ft. The invert of the upstream end of the new 18” culvert shall be at the same elevation as the invert of the existing 36" culvert. This invert elevation should be confirmed in writing and not allowed to be changed in the fiituie without input and approval of the DNR, Trails & Waterways Unit. Written documentation will also be required to identify the party or parties responsible for maintaining the proposed water drainage structures. We request that the agreement for the maintenance of the drainage structures be between the DNR and the City of Orono, even if the City of Orono requires the homeowners association to maintain the structure. DNR, Trails & Waterways Unit requires inspection authority on the drainage structures and horse trail treadway construction. A minimum of two week advance notice of construction dates will be necessary to alert trail users of trail construction activity. The developer will be responsible for signing and taking precautions to protect the trail users from harm during construction of the drainage structures and horse trail treadway and all restoration work along the trail. Response in writing to these concerns will be needed before the DN'R, Trails & Waterways Unit will support the proposed development as it may negatively impact the Luce Line State Trail, Please keep us informed of future plans for this de'/elopment. Thank you, Suzann Willhite Metro Trails & Waterways Specialist cc; Martha Reger % 4 Ojm1"0' ‘5 m4 112 'o Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Region 6A Trails & Waterways, 9925 Valley View Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344. Office (612) 826-6764; (Fax) 826-6767. April 15,1999 City of Orono Paul Weinberger PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Weinberger, This letter addresses concerns regarding application #2477 submitted by George Stickney to the City of Orono Planning Commission for a Class III subdivision for property located at 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South Please include this letter in the project file documenting the state’s concerns. The proposed subdivision will create 8 building sites on 20.5 acres. The State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources, Trails & Waterways Unit manages the Luce Line State Trail on the south side and the Wakefield-Conry Rest Area on the east side of the Stickney property. There are several major concerns regarding this application. One, that the proposed development dc -s not adversely effect the water drainage along the state trail or adjoining state property. In the letter dated April 5,1999, firom Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers referring to this project, it is noted that “The SWMP [Storm Water Management Plan) indicates that water quantity may be a problem downstream firom this site and recommends restricting this outlet to 27 inches in diameter. Reducing the size of the wetland ou*let pipe will reduce the rate of storm water downstream but will increase the high water level (HWL) of the wetland to an elevation of approximately 966.” The outlet referred to in this letter is the pipe currently under the state trail. The existing elevation at this site is not given. There is the potential for a higher water level along the trail. Currently there aie no requests made to our office for permission to change this outlet. A second concern is that the standard setbacks be adhered to in planning for this development. This would apply to septic systems, retention ponds, and buildings. This includes outbuilding as well, and should be clearly disclosed to future landowners. DNR Information: 612-296-6157. 1-800-766-6000 • TTY: 612-296-5484. 1-800-657-3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer Values Divefsiiy Printed on Revycled Paper Containing a Minimum of HKr Po%t*ConNumer Waste . 1 i The third concern is that the developer and future landowners be aware of property boundaries and not damage the landscape or remove vegetation on state property. This has been a problem in the past when adjacent landowners create private access trails to state land. Please address these concerns in the project review and keep us informed of future plans for this development. More information is needed to determine the impact of the changes in water drainage on the adjacent state property. Thank you, Suzann Willhite Metro Trails & Waterways Specialist cc: Martha Reger • i i Application Date: Completion Date: 60 Day Deadline: 5/19/99 5/19/99 7/18/99 C ouncil meeting JUN 2 6 1999 Cl I y Ul- UHUDIUREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 6/23/99 ITEM NO.: /Q Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Planning Intern Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2497 GailBriner 1760 Shadywood Road Variance-Public Hearing Zoning District:LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 Acre) Lot Area:10,700 s.f. Application: The applicant has proposed to rebuild an existing rotting deck. The proposed deck will be in the same location and the same size as the existing deck. This application requires the following variance approval: 1 . Structure in the 0'-75' lakshore setback area. The applicants are requesting to rebuild an existing deck within the 0’-75' lakeshore setback area. 2. Hardcover in the 0'-75’ lakeshore setback. The applicants are requesting 573 s.f. (11.94%) where 0 s.f. (0%) is allowed. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: • approve the variance for 0'-75' lakeshore setback area. approve the variance for hardcover within O'-75' of the lakeshore. applicant is required to remove plastic from all rock beds on the property, and remove plastic and rock from area under deck. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: I’o adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. h CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN SS323 PHONE: (612)249-4600 FAX: (612)249-4616 ZONING FILE #2497 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE; June 24.1999 TO;Gail Briner 1760 Shadywood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO: Jeff McCall 3410 The Mall Minnetonka, MN 55345 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Variance DATE OF MEETING: June 21, 1999 VOTE:6 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS; Applicant is required to remove plastic from all rock beds on the property, and remove plastic and rock from area under deck. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council June 28,1999, meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. X:\-\PPS\WPWIN60\WPDOCS'OAROLE«*CACnONU497 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (A) AND 2; AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (1) FILE #2497 WHEREAS, Gail Briner (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 1760 Shadywood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 17, Shady Wood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Plarming Commission held a public hearing on June 21, 1999, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) to permit construction of a deck replacing an existing deck that is located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback area and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to allow 573 s.f. (11.94%) hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback area where 573 s.f. (11.94%) exists and 0 s.f. (0%) is allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2497. The property is located in the LR-IC, Zoning District, where 1/2 acre or 21,780 s.f. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of .49 acres or 10,700 s.f. Page 1 of 5 i i 4 3.The Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 21, 1999 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: The deck is currently located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback area, B. The proposed deck will be the same size, location, and dimensions as the pre-existing deck it replaces. C. Hardcover amount of 11.94% exceeds allowed amount of 0% in 0-75' lakeshore setback. D.The property contains excess hardcover generally, contained within a number of decorative rockbeds lined with plastic sheeting, and it would be appropriate to convert these rockbeds to non-hardcover. Ihe City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty, is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (A) and 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit construction of a deck to replace an existing Page 2 of 5 deck which is located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback area and to allow 573 s.f. (11.94%) hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback area per the approved plan attached as Exhibit A. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. The applicant shall remove plastic from all rockbeds on the property within 90 days of receiving a building permit. The {^)plicant shall remove all plastic and rock from area under deck within 90 days of receiving a building permit, or prior to final inspection, whichever is earlier. The applicant is advised that the hardcover items and percentages approved with this resolution are approved only in conjunction with the approved plan, and this approval does not intend to grant approval for any other future plan that may be proposed in the future at the same hardcover percentage. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 28, 2000). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 28th day of June, 1999 ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 28th day of June, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instniment was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page ^ of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) On this day of . 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) On this day of .199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 f m m • • m • • • .9 ••• • • • m • I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ; GAIL BRINER OF LOT 17, SHADY WOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA •• • # 1m UCAL ocsc»»noN Of Ul 17. Shody Wood TMt ou>€)r shows lh« bou^dofles of Iho cbovt doscrlbod prcccrty. ond Iho locolioA of on osioUng houst. gorogo. ond ol otho/ ««s^ **hordcovor** Ihortoa It doos not pufpoei to Wiow ony othor irr^ovt- monts or oncroochmonU. o : ^on morliir BoorVigt Ohown oro bottd upon on ossunod dotun m • ^ #2497 n'MOi •Aft SClOMtO* OTam I $• 19154 COF^ k GRONBERG. INC HdCMIlM OCMBIA UlO BinCm VI flOICB 40 lAlMUOt AYlKJt UK2 V9L Ui SaJM • 12-479-4141 IKSKB* CBvtrr iNAt iM vceruroi m *CF«ar •AS SI0A40 rr lo OS U09 m soca am owt I m 1 ear icdoo womsc 4 ooooi a *o um I tMO M U*1 r K Oa « O 0**t -1 f u* ix*7oc P> KMX i"-5< OATC 9/19/91 jot Na 99164 . \ 1 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Planning Intern DATE:June 7,1999 SUBJECT: #2497 GailBriner 1760 Shadywood Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1C One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 acre) Lot Area:10,700 s.f.(.49 acre) Municipal sewer and water Application: The applicant has proposed to rebuild an existing rotting deck. The existing deck has been removed. The new proposed deck will be in the same location and the same size. The deck area lies within the 0'-75' lakeshore setback area. The hardcover amount for the lot will not increase with the new deck. The applicant seeks approval of a variance for lakeshore setback and hardcover. This application requires the following variances: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (A): To permit a lakeshore setback variance to allow the proposed deck to be located within 75' of the lakeshore. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(l): To permit a hardcover variance to allow 573 s.f. (11.94%) of hardcover in the 0 ’-75' lakeshore setback area to permit the construction of the proposed deck. The amount of hardcover allowed in this area is 0 s.f. (0%). The hardcover will not increase because the proposed deck is to be the same size as the one removed. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.22, Subd. 1(A): Lakeshore Setback Regulations Section 10.22, Subd. 2: Allowed Hardcover Section 10.56 Subd. 16 (L)(l): Allowed Hardcover H2497 Gail Briner 1760 Shadywood Road Variances 6/7/99 Page I 1t ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards: LR-IC (1/2 acre) Lot Area Lot Width Lakeshore Setback Required 21,780 s.f.100’75' Existing 10,700 s.f.61'60’ Proposed 10,00 s.f.61’60’ Hardcover : Distance from Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Shoreline Setback Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover 0'-75'4,800 s.f.0 s.f.573 s.f.573 s.f. 0%11.94%11.94% 75'-250’5,900 s.f.1,475 s.f.3,105 s.f.3,105 s.f 25%52.63% 52.63% Structuial Coverage : U2497 Gail Briner 1760 Shadpvood Road Variances 6/7/99 Page 2 Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 10,700 s.f Allowed: 1,605 s.f 15% Existing: 2,115 s.f.19% Proposed: 2,115 s.f 19% Statement of Hardship: The applicant has included her statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicant should also be asked for her testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1. Replacing an existing deck, hardcover amount will not increase. 2. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the variances. Attachments A Application B Site Plan/Survey C New Deck Plan D Plat Map E Location Map F Site Topography G Hardcover Calculations H Property Owner ’s List I Permit Record U2497 Gail Briner 1760 Shadywood Road Variances 6T7/99 Page 3 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Application# ^ ^ ^ ^ Date Received" Amount Paid i PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) l*~7 " 002J2-_____________ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired___________________________________^(month/year) I (do) ifdon^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: V residential ___pother (specify) Zoning District: nruiniq:ia( ^.uer/ lCoJe^ APPLICANT . , ^ f A O ' Fhone^nomer . ______, ^ Namer^4^lV\g.^AVl * CoP>>\ Phone(work)P^ » li% Phoneniomef*'* .---3?. Address:p too jtCity: o <5 Zip:. OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Address: 1 “7 6<o *^Koq.t>,,oo Phone (home) 4-^/ - ^>3^3» ____ Phone (work)______________ City:_____uTorsi o Zip: ^ 1H '•i. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: L stimated Construction Cost $ *3 (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width '><' Hardcover Lot Coverage y Setback: Front X_Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSEnP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing ^ compliance vrith Zoning Code requirements: Kih'.gL vaj.H»<n ^ -------------- J (attach additional sheets if necessary) • • • * • I • • CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR • GAIL BRINER OF LOT 17. SHADY WOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA { A LCCAL OCSCJIPnON Of PHOMSIS, Lot 17, Shotfy Wood This tunroy thomt Ui« of Iho c6ovt dttcr^td properly, ond tho locolion of on ositUng Keuto. dorogt. ond ol oU mt «ft«0io "hordeovtf** Iho/oon. It do«t not puport to any othor i»r\pfovf- m«ntt or onciooclwncnls. o yon nxrtior Boortngt tho«n or« bosed pen on oootjviod doti^ #2497 Mioo ifW [33 ■3«■■■■CSOHIHHi ■pnB ■M 5 ss COF^ k GRONBERG. INC .uo«arn«tfiifUMCM 40 CMMfIMX AlOiC LM U0. Mi MJM • l2-47>-4U1 I »cm« a**rr rH^i tm vterotoi «■ •voit »as noMB rr «« Ol CKX« mr onut onououi mo »or I Ml A OAT Ignore reount ooooi mo imo •MOIOI MBI M VMS O M Oa O O OMWA KMX r-5tf ""VTt" 3/13/9f AM Ma 99104 fe 4 4C0 ^■QO CHIPPEWA U ORONO WEAH cm [egppiii. VK« Dl QPOHi cm 0 HIGH 400 V •. G)urs& • • mo i' SCHRtSnNE OR EILEEN $T 5 f ist. . ' ■ r* ._• BATS I W’StubbsM'^::-n \ ^ # •*•• • * ^ " V * * ••**\- f. •; •;V-.Ar v;.vv •: < tPja *•. • • • , /• t**; y q WATERTOWN •• wJ COj, "“OTMIIOI "''r- •—■- ?/ot^ ; SOMERSET ^ctwoo^ «ehi3^ BATSDERO FOX Une WHITE ir-^- . Forest m-Nortb Vv “-\ t: • OAHLRO^; ,, bbanowewu \ave 3AV _ tWURRT I i ■\ ; vvv>-.V-V 4 ORONO Arm >>r®i u'i3 ' BOHNS POINT \U o ISLAND Fagerness Feint _ •*' • '••'-• * • ' i*- •« ' r --v-X ^ >• • - .. •'-. *-• »v r • ♦«• .* --J ' ,• .-i . ,<r~ '. \ , Crystal jf: Crystal Bay •»- • X A^W V«l •« •it.t r / HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET A 6 SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) (^0^75^ 75-250’ 250-500’ 500-1000 ’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ^ A. House ______________ X ______________ . = / /g_____S.F. ____ = S.F. ____ = S.F. ____ = S.F. Length Width X X X I B. Garage X C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X E Palio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other L/^.X PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE' A. House Length X X X B. Garage * X C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X G. Other X total hardcover in zone TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A - - B 33 Z3/ t-Z Z3 // TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A S73 ^ B 4300 S73 X 100 Width Z8 C3 X 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.- S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. _S.F. _SF. // .<34 % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Cor/7, A B ?1 f p-r.*- ' ■ » r*w • • 'i:.4 S.F. A S.F. B % 7^ HARDCOVER CALCULA HON WORKSHEET y-/ 7-?^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (TS-ISO^ 250-500' 500-1000* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE X ■ /423 SF.A. House Length X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X Sidewalk .X X E. Patio/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain Bv Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other U ZG LP TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 3f05 - D PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X Length X X X B. Garage X C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A - 3 Width 2 90 Z/2. 3.9 B! 7.2 57c:> / 2.3 // 3/05 B 9oo \ 100 5900 Width B G- S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _S.F. _S.F. SZ.03 % A B S.F. S.F. S.F S.Ff (1 S.F. G' A ■r. -J r* • S.r S.F. 1 aS.F. S.F. *. .1 SF. X 100 S.F. A S.F. B' % I i4 3:RUN DATE 05/17/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATXON SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST BATCH 507 PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR SO 17-117-23 ?1 0002 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXI»1ED A 0 D FXNKELSTEXN ARTHUR 0 DOROTHY FXNKELSTEXN 993S lOATH AVE N NAPLE DROVE HN 55309 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO 17-117-23 21 0007 00050 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED HENNEPXH FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 40 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55523 PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR SO 17-117-25 21 0021 01750 SHAOYWOOD RO ORETCHEN S SHAW ORETCHEN S SHAH 1750 SNAOYHOOD RO NAYZATA HN 55591 PROP AMR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 30 17-117-25 21 0020 01700 SHAOYWOOD RO DARYL R CARLSON DARYL R CARLSON 1700 SHAOYWOOD RO WAYZATA HN 55591 REPORT NO. PXO3!M01 PACE 32 30 17-117-23 21 0003 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXCNEO AID FXNKELSTEXN ARTHUR I DOROTHY FXNKELSTEXN 9933 lOOTH AVE N HAPLE GROVE HN 55309 SO 17-117-23 21 0004 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 00 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55525 r.. i 38 17-117-23 21 0008 01795 SHADYHOOD RD LID PZLGRAH LEROY I DELPHZE PZL6RAM BOX 81 NAVARRE NN 55392 38 17-117-23 21 0020 01790 SHADYNOOD RO T 8 I H L SWANSON THONAS 8 I NARZLYN L SWAN!;ON 1740 SHADYNOOD RD NAYZATA HN 55391 • •A 30 17-117-25 21 0022 01700 SHADYWOOO RD GAIL S BRXNER GAIL S BRXNER 1700 SHADYWOOD RD NAYZATA HN 55591 30 17-117-23 21 0025 01770 SHAOYWOOD RD B J t T J PETERSON BRADLEY I TRACI PETERSON 1770 SHAOYWOOD RD NAYZATA HN 55591 I • 30 17-117-25 21 0025 01790 SHADYWOOD RD DONALD J URBAN DONALD J URBAN 1790 SHADYWOOD RD NAYZATA HN 55591 • « TOTAL BATCH 507 00011 • '■ i I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATXON AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEWIEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION/ TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DAT ■l • 0 Permit No c9 PVV7 «3l £1^1 (/>&SI a'■m± PERMIT RECORD Date ;>• 3- Cf" nis'f,^ P- 3 b8 'fJS'70 i'll'TO )hth - <? t/ o’-g-‘?y n-<S'9<l_ // - 3k/- ^ 7 c/ Tg: / I Type of Permit seu^R ^4 MotrtOT^ g LuATtTn IfOte cJ/n oviCA3 .r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COf JNJCIL meeting JUN 2 Q 1999 Ui IY onuivu DATE: June 28, 1999 ITEM NO.: // Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer’s Report Item Description: Mooney Lake Outlet Mooney Lake is located in the far northea«;tem part of Orono with portions of the lake in the Cities of Plymouth and Medina. The lake is 118 acres in size and does not have a natural outlet. A pumping station would be required to provide an outlet to the lake. Because the lake does not have an outlet, there is a concern about rising water levels in the lake. Residents from the three Cities have been working for the last several years to find a solution to the rising water levels. The only Orono resident on Mooney Lake is Doug Dayton. On May 1,1998, the City Council approved a resolution petitioning the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to complete a feasibility study for this project. The feasibility study has been completed by Bonestroo Engineers. Study Results In 1976 the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources assigned an Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of988.0 to the lake. The lowest water elevation of record was 983.1 in 1961. 'fhe highest recorded level was 989.37 recorded on May 26, 1996. Over the past twenty years, the lake has been expieriencing relatively high water levels. High water elevations have been causing damage to trees, yards and landscaping. According to a citizen's report in 1996, over 115 six-inch diameter trees are now under water and are either dying or dead. Over 65 twelve-inch diameter trees and ten 24-36 inch diameter trees are now under water. Flood risk to residential structures is low. The walkout elevation for the lowest structure next to the lake on the north side was 992.85 or 3.48 feet above the highest historical water surface elevation recorded for the lake. The entire drainage district is almost fully developed so great increases in future water levels are not likely. The watershed area of the lake is relatively small compared to the surface area of the lake and infiltration and evaporation appear to limit lake level rises. The feasibility study identified four options. City staff preferred Option 1. This option includes a pumping station on Doug Da>lon's property with piping south and east to the County Road 6/North Femdale Road intersection. A connection would then be made to the new storm sewer system in umm Pfifra •Mm •lira ninr#[•JTR [•■ra r«fnT^ :mi9\5ijT«nira njwira rtvniTi BJljwn I RT5?n ml5 giiifmiswsTnriir^niTiT^ rtlTiT^ ninrii Mijfra i> i» Request for Council Action continued Page 3 June 10,1999 Mooney Lake Outlet water bodies within the district. There are no public access points on this lake, so benefits to the general public are limited. The MC WD Board is seeking direction from the Cities on this issue. My understanding is that this is a unique project for the MCWD. If an option to allocate costs to the Cities is used, the question of how each City fimds these costs needs to be addressed. The assessment of the costs to all of the properties in the drainage area is one option. While this option does levy costs on those properties contributing to the problem, this can be difficult to assess. The non-lakeshore property owiicrs will probably not want to pay an assessment. To sustain assessment appeals, a benefit to these non-lakeshore properties must be proven and this will be very difficult. The second option could be to assess only the lakeshore property owners who would be receiving the benefits of tree preservation and shoreline protection. Another City cost allocation method could be general tax revenue. The difficulty with this method is proving a City-wide benefit from this project. Summary The MCWD is interested in obtaining input from the three Cities on the feasibility of this project and recommendations for possible funding options. The first question is the overall feasibility of this project. The estimated project costs are $180,000 to $220,000. At this time, the risk to house flooding is minimal. The lowest house elevation is 3.48 feet above the highest recorded water level. Damage to approximately 200 shoreline trees has occurred because of high water levels. Are the benefits received from this project greater than the costs? If the project is determined to be feasible, funding options need to be considered. Costs could be allocated to Cities or the project could be funded through the MCWD capital improvement program. COUNOL ACTION REQUESTED: Consideration of the feasibility study tor this project and recommendations to the MCWD on the feasibility of this project and possible funding methods for project completion. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Improving Quality ofWater, Qttality of Life Gray Freshwater Center Hwys. 15 & 19, Navarre Mail: 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MN 55331-9576 Phone:(612)471-0590 Fax:(612)471-0682 Email: adminO minnehahacreek.org Web Site: www.minnehahacreek.org Board of Managers Pamela G. Blixt James Calkins Lance Fisher Monica Gross Thomas W.LaBounty Thomas Maple, Jr. Malcolm 0PiNid on ftcydid pl^ al Itiil 30% eoniufnir wiiii April 23,1999 Mr. Greg Gappa Orono City Hall P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 2 (t Re: Proposed Mooney Lake Outlet Dear Greg: Enclosed is the final draft report of the Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study prepared by Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates. This report describes four alternatives for providing an outlet for the lake. As we discussed at our April 2,1999 meeting, I am requesting that you review it and return any comments to me for incorporation into the final report. Copies of the draft report have also been sent to Ms. Terry Ankeny of the Mooney Lake Association and Mr. Douglas Dayton, a resident of Orono whose property would be afifected by Option 1 at their request. We are particularly interested in your city’s comments related to the need for the outlet project and opinions for how the project, if it goes forward, should be funded. You J note that four options for funding are Usted on page 8 of the report. We look forward to your response. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 471-6285. Sincerely, MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Peter Cangialo^P.E. District Engineer C:Fred Moore Loren Kohnen Teny Schwalbe L. Eric Evenson, MCWD Ismael Mardnez-Ortiz, Bonestroo \ Draft Report for Feasibility Study Mooney Lake Outlet Minnehaha Creek Watershed District April, 1999 File No. 633-99-100 1/I Bonestroo Rosene /Vnderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects I ^ f. * : *. Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study Table of Contents Introduction Background Figure 1 - Mooney Lake Drainage Area Evaluation of Options a. Route and Cost Analysis Figure 2 - Mooney Lake Outlet Options b. Hydraulic Considerations c. Other Considerations d. City Staff Input Recommendations Figure 3 - Proposed Outlet, Lift Station, And Stormsewer Alignment Cost-Sharing Considerations Page Nos. 1 1 4 6 6 8 r! Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study (Draft) I.Introduction The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) directed that an Engineer’s Report in conformance with Minnesota Statutes 103D.71 1, Subd. 2 be prepared to evaluate the cost and feasibility of installing an outlet for Mooney Lake (State protected water 27- 1 34P). The MCWD directive was issued in response to petitions requesting such a study from the cities of Orono and Plymouth. The study is to include the following elements: • The preferred route and configuration for the outlet • The estimated cost of the project • The impact of outlet operation on the downstream conveyance system • The benefits of the project II. Background Mooney Lake is a shallow lake (maximum depth of less than 15 feet) with a surface area of approximately 118 acres. The lake has no naniral surface outlet. Portions of the lake lie within the communities of Plymouth, Medina, and Orono. The lake’s current watershed is approximately 481 acres, with 279 acres (58%) lying within Plymouth, 136 acres (28%) within Medina, and 66 acres (14%) within Orono (Figure 1). Land use in those portions of the watershed within the cities of Medina and Orono is dominated by large lot residential development while Plymouth ’s portion of the watershed is primarily medium density residential. In 1976, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) assigned an ordinary high water level (OHW) of 988.0 to the lake. Water levels in Mooney Lake fluctuate in response to the annual balance between water lost through evaporation and infiltration and water gauied from watershed runoff and direct precipitation on the lake surface. Records for water levels in the lake indicate the highest recorded level was 989.37 on May 26,1996 while the lowest recorded level was 983.1 in 1961. Over the past 20+ years, the lake has been experiencing relatively high water levels. These high water elevations have been causing damage to trees, yards, and landscaping. Flood risk to residential structures adjacent to the lake is low. The City of Plymouth has surveyed the walkout elevations for the lowest residences adjacent to the lake (located on the lake’s north side). The elevation of the lowest walkout was 992.85 or 3.48 feet above the highest historical water surface elevation recorded for the lake. MOONEY LAKE DRAINAGE AREA m MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MOONEY LAKE OUTLET FEASIBILITY STUDY \633\63399100\CAD\DWG\63399100W01 .DWG 4/16/99 FIGURE 1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engin»0f3 i ArcMtcts COMM. . ni. Evaluation of Options a. Route and Cost Analysis Providing an outlet for Mooney Lake will require a lift station and pipe to convey discharge water to an existing drainage system where the water can flow by gravity to Lake Minnetonka. Six possible outlet route options were identified as a result of discussions with city staff from adjacent communities and a review of conditions in the field. Two of the route options were eliminated after further field investigations and discussions with city staff indicated they were not feasible. The approximate locations for the remaining four options are shown in Figure 2. A brief discussion of each option is presented below: Option 1 Description: The outlet route would be south along the Orono-Plymouth boundary from the south central shoreline of Mooney Lake. The outlet conveyance system would be a combination of force main and gravity pipe approximately 1,500 feet in length. The pipe would connect to a future storm sewer located in Femdale Road at the intersection with County Road 6. The Femdale Road street and storm sewer improvements project are scheduled for constmetion in 1999. The discharge would travel through several stormwater management wetlands southeast of Hadley Lake in Plymouth before reaching the City of Wayzata’s conveyance system. Advantages: Discharge would be conveyed to a new storm sewer system capable of handling the additional flow and for which easements are already secured. No or minimal easement costs. Owner of the land across which the route traverses has indicated his willingness to grant an easement free of charge. The lift station could be placed in a secluded area away from residences and high traffic areas. Tree loss would be minimal, since the route is mainly through open areas. No access road required. Property owner will allow use of his driveway for maintenance purposes. Disadvantages: The elevation change is large (more than 40 feet), which requires a larger, more expensive lift station. Three-phase power will be necessary for operation of the larger pump. Will require a new line from County Road 6 to the lift station (approximately 800 feet). Pipe will have to be jacked under County Road 6 • •‘A--* , ; * •y- - ' -r^\ *// - : OspS*fo* ‘. *.>'“v^ r * V*' • • ri^ •" *.;>..;- ■. // •• ; I o I:; • t .' =■'': r';s«- \ fe g s^- .cnv >g^„ \ Nl EBmX --.=• : Ipgl “—77 r/7. ' \Wo 9- O-J .:•-',.V;;-.- ■ it . on e RSaonc: It MOONEY LAKE OUTLET OPTIONS m MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MOONEY LAKE OUTLET FEASIBILITY STUDY \633\63399100\CAD\DWG\63399100W02 .DWG FIGURE 2 M Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Englrmors S Architects 4/16/99 COMM. . Estimated Cost:$180,000-$220,000 Option 2 Description: This route is located approximately parallel to and several hundred feet east of the route for Option 1. The pipe would again be a combination of force main and gravity pipe about 1,300 feet in length with a north-south alignment from the south shoreline of Mooney Lake. The discharge point would be a small wetland on the north side of County Road 6 just east of Femdale Road. The discharge would then be carried in existing drainage swales and pipes to Hadley Lake. Advantages: May not need to install a pipe under County Road 6, since a corrugated metal pipe imder the road from the small wetland already exists. Disadvantages: The elevation change between the lake and the wetland is large, which will require a large, more expensive lift station. Easement costs are likely to be very high Tree loss would be moderate to significant, since the route between the lake and County Road 6 is wooded. The Mooney Lake discharge could exacerbate existing problems with erosion along the open channel portion of the conveyance system south of County Road 6 There are currently no drainage easements covering a portion of the route south of County Road 6. Estimated Cost:$210,000-$250,000 Option 3 Description: This proposal would involve withdrawing water from the southeast bay of Mooney Lake and carrying the water in a combination of force main and gravity pipe for approximately 1,300 feet in an easterly direction to an existing catch basin at 18* Avenue and Ranier Lane in Plymouth. Advantages: Connects directly to an existing in-place storm sewer, so there would be no erosion problem at the outlet of the pipe from the lake. Approximately 50% of the length of the route lies within City-owned park property and existing easements, so easement costs could be reduced. The small elevation change (about 15 feet) would result in a smaller, lower cost lift station requiring only single phase power. L. Disadvantages: Density of residential development is somewhat higher than for Options 1 and 2; lift station would be in higher traffic area and providing access road may be more difficult, since Troy Lane is a private road. West end of the route is wooded, so some tree loss is unavoidable. Pipe could be installed by directional boring to minimize tree loss, but this construction technique is more expensive than open cut. Would disturb about 300 feet of 18 “* Avenue in Plymouth along with an adjacent concrete sidewalk. Easement costs are likely to be very high. Estimated Cost:$180,000-$200,000 Option 4 Description: This proposal involves withdrawing water fi^om the southern tip of the southeast bay of Mooney Lake. The water would be carried south under County Road 6, then east along the south ditch adjacent to County Road 6. The withdrawn water would be discharged to Pinetree Pond (State protected water 27-822w). This option would involve installation of approximately 1,900 feet of force main and gravity pipe. Advantages: Easements costs are likely to be lower because most of the route is within existing Hennepin County right-of-way. There is little elevation change, which will minimize the size and cost of the lift station. Disadvantages: The density of residential development is somewhat higher than for Options 1 and 2; lift station would be in higher traffic area and providing an access driveway may be difficult. The route from the lake to County Road 6 is wooded and very steep at the lake. The pipe will have to be jacked under County Road 6, which is expensive. Easement costs are likely to be very high. Estimated Cost:$210,000-5225,000 ^1 b. Hydraulic Considerations Water discharged from Mooney Lake will travel south through existing conveyance systems in the City of Wayzata before it is eventually discharged to Lake Minnetonka. One concern with the discharge of this pumped water is overburdening downstream conveyance systems. This potential is Wghest if the discharge occurs when the downstream s^'stem is already being used to carry runoff from local drainages. To minimize the potential for overburdening downstream conveyance systems with the Mooney Lake discharge, pumping from the lake could be confined to off-peak conditions. For example, pumping could take place in early spring after snowmelt or in late fall when downstream facilities are at normal water level. In addition, a low pumping rate of I cubic foot per second (cfs) could be used to minimize short term fluctuations in downstream water bodies as well as minimize the cost of the project. Water elevation records collected for Mooney Lake since 1995, observations of shoreline condition around the lake, and discussions with watershed district and city staff suggest that the water level in the lake could be set to fluctuate freely between elevation 987 and 988. We estimate that if pumping is conducted beginning at elevation 988, pumping would be necessary every 3-5 years. The infrequent rate of pumping is in part a function of the relatively small watershed of the lake compared to its surface area and the role that infiltration and evaporation appear to play in limiting lake level rises. A hydraulic modeling analysis was performed using HydroCAD (Version 5.01). The main objective of the analysis was to estimate lake level response to different pumping scenarios for a critical runoff event. The results of that analysis are as follows: • The runoff generated by a critical 10-day 100-year precipitation event (10.8 inches of rainfall over a 10-day period) will increase storage in the lake by about 374 acre-feet. This increase in storage will raise the elevation of the lake by about three feet to an elevation of 990.9 from a starting elevation of 988. • At a pumping rate of 1 cfs, 60-70 days of pump operation would be required to lower the lake elevation by 1 foot. • Pumping from the lake at a rate of 1 cfs during the 10-day 100-year critical event reduces the peak high water level of Mooney Lake by just 0.1 feet. As a result of the above information, we conclude the following with regard to operation of a lift station: 1 The water level in Mooney Lake can be set to fluctuate freely between the elevations of 887 and 888. Pumping from the lake should be considered when the elevation of the lake reaches an elevation of 888. A pumping rate of 1 cfs is recommended to minimize impacts to downstream water bodies as well as to minimize the cost of the project. * • • Pumping should be conducted during off-peak periods between runoff events (such as after spring snowmelt or in the late fall), since pumping during a large runoff event vrill not appreciably reduce the peak water level in Mooney Lake. Pumping during off-peak conditions will reduce impacts on downstream conveyance systems. • Pumping will likely be needed only every 3-5 years. c. Other Considerations The installation of an outlet in Mooney Lake will require a permit from the Mn Department of Natural Resources. MnDNR area hyi-ologist Ceil Strauss was contacted in March, 1999 to discuss permitting considerations. She outlined the following requirements: • The final control elevation for Me •''ney Lake can be no lower than 1.5 feet below the OHW of 988. Setting the control water level at a higher elevation will be governed by flood risk considerations. • MnDNR’s main concern will be to assure that the discharges from Mooney Lake will not cause flooding problems downstream. Dry weather pumping is a good strategy to avoid potential problems, but MnDNR will require an operating plan that specifies when and how the lift station would be operated, when pumping would cease, etc. • MnDNR has no records of eurasian milfoil infestations in Mooney Lake, so screening of the intake would not be required. d. City Staff Input ■ \ On April 2,1999, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District staff and BRA staff met with city representatives from Plymouth, Medina, Orono, and Wayzata to review the information presented above. The purpose of the meeting was to solicit input from city staff in selecting a recommended outlet option for Mooney Lake. Meeting attendees generally supported Option 1. Staff from the City of Wayzata stated that they will need to be shown how the additional water from Mooney Lake will be routed safely through Wayzata. IV. Recommendations The following recommendations are made for the proposed Mooney Lake outlet: 2. 3. Route. The route outlined in Option 1 is preferred and is shown in Figure 3. This route could be modified slightly depending on the desires of the owner of the property between Mooney Lake and County Road 6. Operation. A pumping rate of 1 cfs is recommended for the lift station. The normal water level for Mooney Lake would be allowed to fluctuate between 987 and 988, with the expected high water level for the 10-day 100-year event at 990.9. Pumping would be considered at a water elevation of 988 and would be conducted during off-peak conditions in early spring or late fall. An operating plan which ties operation of the pump to the elevation of downstream water bodies in sensitive areas would be developed. The plan would also address who would operate the system. Costs. Preliminary cost estimates for this option are as follows: Construction: Lift station Pipe, manholes Access Easements Power Restoration Contingency $70,000-580,000 $40,000-550,000 0 0 520,000-525,000 $10,000-515,000 $40,000-550,000 TOTAL 5180,000-5220,000 Annual Operation and Maintenance: Electricity (60 days of pumping) $ 1,000 Maintenance, inspection $750 Parts, etc. $250 TOTAL $2,000/yr. y* y \ ^ • . V **w- ' •.N • ^<■' • ’•' ^ \ ■ --^ ’i ■• . •.. w•.’■•■•-A!'•■2| \\:: V: f 1 r * ' 1 * • » .' • .•••■■'•■- -" ■ :. cn v QirAtvu:wU-.T.^: ‘^ ■'"■ • . •'* • • /• * ■ 7:1 Jf:• •/ rv ■• ' - ' Vf/^/ • * ; •, .• V- i *7* ^ • • ' '.-Sdo ) PRIVATE-^ ‘ DRIVEWAY. ACCESS JO, ^ §!fei u.o __ c? l.l . 1 i • I ♦ f . 1/ f ?7'V-V; A a V.... . f.S ' *\*Sc*'- '‘'V *'*•‘'-ii •■ ’•jV- i L/V-~ .V" • VI n a/v-c — 1 1^7 “ ' •“I^Woane^y /. > ? -— INLET PIPE • .. • ^ *•«. y . * -•Ti.» *4 • f N. iV <:p •-t. I ^ m^oi^e ^.,;] >r^ .'Y -Ltdri /: '■■>'■' •:■ •/ s\ \ ?h r •'P^RQ^Alk ’JACK.4*NE^^ r ** " • y t ^••w • • * «• \?4- ui_ -j . .• .•*/ / V ,■•• ■/ t • ^•* 1* .**- y Scale i(v feet L'KI:' • •! y ’ ■*»'“■■ i y" Connect, to '): :f^p;f>pSEP CA'TGH ;i/ ___ PROPOSED OUTLET. LIFTSTATION. AND STORMSEWER ALIGNMENT MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MOONEY LAKE OUTLET FEASIBILITY STUDY \633\633991 00\CA0\0WG\63399 1 00W03.DWG 4/16/99 FIGURE 3 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene Andsriik & |\J| Associates Engineers S Architects COMM. t •• ; % • • * • -v \ .“:■ \ 's i « • ■, ' , V • , •' :^'V 1 •:-•.• _tnv f' i,- ; -i .v>.'. .;. , I V-V-'■ • I'^K life \of * t . I; ll. i Slog -j^yoone-^ ^ .' 5 INLET PIPE • ’' A* / ■i ^ . : • .jiW- . ••• Vf-'•/ -‘.yyyj * •jT .• . • » • ri' *••*V^>S6 PRIVATE DRIVEWAY. ACCESS JO , IF^STAll* £ fc'A '■•'.ASf/- / \ 11/ y.tTSTAJlQH ’- •; ♦ ,> • 1 ’ : f • iK // • .-I’ ■ •• • : - I/’ EXTFfin :n^ '-. VM> i i- .*••** *« **. **tiN*^ -.•* •* • ■ ^^Ct^NdEfe " "*”** *VW,i»^ .• * / ^ •'V ^ " ■ »•■.-•/ / ‘‘ '* •' / V% 'v .* • y r 0m •• , 0 VCATCH . .7/ 'Jr *RCP^-in; 199.9 i. • • - . • • •-..•• ,m. . 0 m « . . . *.7 .« * • • .. . . PROPOSED OUTLET. LIFTSTATION, AND STORMSEWER ALIGNMENT MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MOONEY LAKE OUTLET FEASIBILITY STUDY \633\63399100\CAD\DWG\63399100W03.0WG 4/16/99 FIGURE 3 ^ I Bonestroo Rosene mr^ Anderlik & |\)| Associates Engineers S Architects COMM. V. Cost-Sharing Considerations If an outlet for Mooney Lake is constructed, an appropriate financial strategy to fund the construction, operation, and maintenance of the outlet facility will be needed. At the ■ April 2,1999 meeting with city staff &om the affected communities, several options for allocating costs for the project were discussed. Each is described briefly below. 1. 2. 3. 4. Watershed area. All or a portion of the cost of the project could be assigned to the three communities that share the lake based on the proportion of the total watershed area that lies within each community. Equivalent runoff. Another option to allocate funding responsibility among the three cities is based on the proportionate amount of nmofif each community contributes to the lake for a standard runoff condition. The proportions are a function of both the size of the watershed and the runoff characteristics of the land use for the watershed within each community. Assessed valuation. This option would base the funding responsibility for the communities on the assessed value of the land within each city’s portion of the watershed. Watershed district funding. Under this scenario, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District would fund all or a portion of the project. More detailed analysis of these and possibly other funding options will be completed if there is sufficient interest in pursuing the construction of the project. 8 I COMMort mpETINQ JUN 2 a 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cl It Uf UhUNU DATE: June 28,1999 ITEM NO.: Department Approral: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: Spring Hill Golf Course Trail Agreement Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Attached you will find a copy of the Spring Hill Golf Course Trail Agreement for your review and consideration. This agreement is the result of a meeting that was held to review and discuss the trail on Monday, June 21st. Myself, Mayor Gabriel Jabbour and Council member Dick Flint, and representatives from Spring Hill Golf Club were in attendance at this meeting. The trail is basically constructed with the exception of a few minor items which are noted on the attached punch list with the agreement. The main item of concern is the trail on the north side of County Road 6. Spring Hill has constructed a trail within the Hennepin County Right of Way. There is some uncertainty about the long term availability of the easement in this area. Another concern is the trail along Tamarack Drive, from the maintenance building driveway north to the wetland. This portion of the trail has not been constructed yet because it would be a dead end trail at the wetland. The conceptual agreement reached at this meeting was that Spring Hill Golf Club would agree to trail construction along County Road 6 or along Tamarack Drive when requested by the City. In the event trail construction was not completed, when requested by the City, Spring Hill Golf Club would agree to be assessed for any costs associated with completion of the trail construction. Work on this finalizing this agreement has been ongoing all week between the two parties. The Council will need to review and discuss the attached agreement. The City attorney ’s opinion on this agreement will also be needed. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Consideration/Approval of the Spring Hill Golf Course Trail Agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney. FROM (FRII 6. 25'99 15:47/ST. 15:45/KO. 3700000072 P 2 Faegrh & Benson LLI K orvi'est v,,KNrKU. Sourii ’irvtvm STnr.j.'r MlN>.TAi'OLl'>, MiNNESOlA >541J2-'5')0I Tn.H’HONC «ia-33« A?lc.)f.> • ACMMItr «l2-33<i-JC2C June 25, 1999 A nii'»VAS M. Cxosnv, Ja Tv!Trt«hy»j'.!#cgfC cotn 6I2/11A-1127 Thomas J. Barrett Hinshaw & Culbertson 222 S. Ninth Sl.,Stc3200 Minneapolis. MN 55402 Re: Spring Hill Golf (^Inb Dear Tom; Enclosed are three executed copies of the Spring Hill Trail Easement Agreement which reflects yesterday afternoon’s and this morning’s discussions. The legal description attached to the Trail Easement w'as prepared by me and modiTied slightly by Dick Flint. We understand that, subject to discussions with the surveyor, the legal description might be changed slightly to accommodate legal concerns. I believe wc have agreement on the real estate subject to the easement. Also enclosed are signed copies of the punch list letter and the wetland mitigation letter. Sincerely, 1 srvv7 Thomas M. Crosby, Jr. TMCikoecf Enclosures cc: Mike OafTron Greg Oappa Andrew M. Hunter III M1:S1 1970.01 MiMneapoiis i>e»ver Dts Moinu London trunkfurt FROM IFRI) 6. 25’99 15:47/ST. 15:45/NO. S700000072 P r j June 23. 1999 City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Re: Sorintt Hill Golf Club Oentkmen and Ladies: Based upon our on-site inq)ection of the trail conducted on the morning of June 21,1999, we agreed to complete on or before July 22,1999 the following construction items on the trail: 1. At the point where the trail going north on Tamarack meets the maintenance road of the golf club, we will grade the slope to provide for a level incline down to the maintenance road.' 2. We will move the present comer of the split-rail fence approximately three feet to the northeast where it turns north from northwesterly near the west end of Spring Hill Road in order to round the comer and to create a four-foot trail space between the fence and the existing trees. 3. We will place a plastic pipe of a size reasonably acceptable to the City beneath the trail surface at the e2»terly end of the interior trail where it crosses the ditch on the north side of Spring Hill Road. This letter constitutes our undertaking to perform the above tedeg which we view in the nature of a "punch-list” with respect to the completion of the trail. Agreement. Other items we discussed will be contained in the body of the Trail Easement Very truly yours. HILL OOLF CLUB Its: TMC/cfk MI:S1M».02 FROM (FRI) 6. 25’99 13:47/ST. 15:45/NO. 3700000072 ? 4 June 24, 1999 City of Orono PO Box 00 Crystal Bay, MN S5323-0066 Spring Hill nnifriiih CcDtlemcit and I^ulics: D to die Conditional Use Pennit granted toSprung Hill Oolf Club by the City of Orooo in June of 1997. reqnired^opentlSirtSrC^lS^'^ 1. ^transfer to the City of Orono two-thirdi of the excess wetland mitigation credjte reciting from the eonstractioa of the golf course which credits will be utilized by the City for the trail system and, to the extent any remain, be available to the City.remain, be available to the City *“ Spring Hill Golf Club die remaining mitigation credits for possible fiiture modifieatioas of the golf course, subject to appUcable laws and aovenunent anmovals 3. subject to applicable laws and goverament ^iprovals, Not to sell Of otherwise transfor su^ retained credits from the golf course she. •II ^ *?“** calculations of the excess wetland mitigation credits and the fonnal transferwill take place promptly. Very truly yours. Its; TMC/efk MIJIITSZM IL FROM (FRI) 6.25 ’99 15:43/ST. 15:45A'0. 3700000072 P 6/24/99 TRAIL easement AGREEMENT This agreement is made and entered into this ^ dav of June 1999 bv <md between Spring Hill Golf Club, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (“Spring Hill"), and ^ ntunicipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesoia (the L.iiy ). Spring Hill is the owner of real estate described a$ follows; Lot 1 Block 1 an Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Hill Golf Club, in accordance with the plat filed in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Spring Hill Properly"). As a part of Conditional Use Permits gi antcd to Spring Hill for the construction and operation of a golf course. Spring Hill has agreed to grant to the City a trail easement. ^ Accordingly, in consideration of One Dollar, tlic mutual covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sutflclencv of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. Spring Hill hereby grants by quit claim to the City a non-exclusive easement for a pedestrian and cross-country' ski trail purposes (the “Trail") and for no other purpose over and across the property' described on Exhibit A attached hereto The clearing on me easement granted by Spring Hill will be approximately four feet wide and the travclc surface will be woodchips. Trail along Spring Hill Road and along Tamarack Dnye from the intersection with County Highw ay 6 North to the maintenance driveway for Sonnet Hill Wak. it:ii________________• t • • .Spring Hill h;^ been constructed by Spring Hill except as provided in Paragraph 4 hereof by^tlw^ity^” “punch list” letter which is dated conicmpcrancously herewith and accepted 3- The Trail on Tamarack Drive north of the maintenance driveway for Spimg Hill up to Wetland No. 12 is subject to tuturc design and construction. Spring Hill will, at its expense, construct the Trail north of the maintenance drivew'ay to Wetland No. 12 upon the request of the City provided that the location of the Trail to the extent that it is lo<^ within the easement granted by Spring Hiii shaii be reasonabiy acceptabie to Spring Hill and the City md further provided that Spring Hill shall ha've no. responsibility for any construction within Wetland No. 12 or North thereof.. FROM (FRI) 6.25 99 15:43/ST. 15:45/NO. 5700000072 P 6 vo.->LMicm K>r LOLimy 11 eh wav No fi if cn/sh mostly witiim the richt of w-tv rc,uc« of .he City, fspriny hIh wffl'nove a. hTernt'T the preceding sentence within the cnsem<^nf I ^ portion of the Trail described in ma. .he a.y obtain all that, when such construction occurs, the Trail hcict further provided west to coordinate with the intersection IrfS^^ng H U RoS^i-nng mil Road and County Highway No. 6. secions 3 md 4 above" t'h’e CrmaC4s”Jh “w “ndertaitinb, se. )b„h i„ expenses ofperfonning such work. SDrinu I ill hf r ” ^ 'he costs and assessments by the Citv for the work as Dcrmj?f<*ri diat it will not object to acknow'ledfies and aomI--c eUoe eu.___.. Agreement. Snrino h;h grant to the ^bnve, and .ha o.hav “;ro"„';tid“;r r“"en will conlnbute up ,o $20,000 towards .rail eo.ur.ruction in go^^^ rail or similar rural-chara’w fbachiK®rad's*be used*w"he" as split demarcation between ihc trail rad the aolf «here needed to indicate a reasons, in which case a rustic, opaque*fra« mev "*7' Of separation IM allowed for the maintenance facility if appHcrat deems'n?*'^'’' that security fencing shall IS screened from off-site view SDrinB^Hiii chin^i ^ " necessary, but only if said fencinir for bicycles or snowm^IlL^^^^ easement gi anted pursuant to this document will not be used shall restrict only the portioTof on ^Ts^Drino Agreement not restrict the City’s trail system on other nrni! ® Hill Property granted herein and will limitation, the rights-of-way adjoining^prhig nght-of-way including, without 11- TTie duration of the casement created herein shall be perpetual. -2- 6 FROM (FRI) 6. 25 ’99 15:49/ST. l5:45/i\0. S700000072 P 7 r«p«.ivc paJi: The parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be clul> executed on the day and year first above written. SPUII^ HILL GOLF CLUB ■Ui(^ Us: CITY OF ORONO Its: And by; Its: STATE OF Minnesota ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. T , non u fo^^going instmment was ackjiowlcdged before me this ^ Y day of ff-____rfSpringWllGolf Club, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, on 4;’ ;f rh*i corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) > ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ..............................................................................................................I THOMAS M. CROSBY JR. I N0TARVPU8UC MINKISOTA HrMMimaabsvnju.it mo . The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this June, 1999, by ________ . the the and by day of Minnesota municipai corporation, on behalf of the corporation' of City of Orono, a -3- FROM (FRI) 6. 25’99 15:49/31. 15:45/NO. 3700000072 P 9 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Trail Easement 1 . That pan of Lot 1, Block Spring Hill Golf Club which i.q ten feet north of the existing right of way along the north side of Spring Hill Road from the center of the Fast I .ong Lake Road rlghl-of-way to County Road No. 6. 2. That portion ol Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Hill Golf Clul), which lie.<? .<;ouiherlv and southwesterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly comer of said Lot 1; thence on an assumed bearing of South 46 degrees 22 minutes 53 seconds East, along the southwesterly line of .said Lot 1, a distance oft 83.52 feet: thence southeasterly a distance of 87.90 feet along said southwesterly line, being a nontangential cur\'c, concave to the southwest, having a central angle of 5 degrees 05 minutes 52 seconds, a radius of 987.93 feet, and a chord bearing of South 53 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds East; thcncc South 50 degrees 49 minutes 53 seconds East, tangent to said curve and along said southwesterly line, a distance of 323.65 feet to the point of beginning of the tine to be described; thence .South 81 dcgiees 29 minutes 44 seconds bast a distance of 44.48 feet; thence South 50 degrees 22 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 87.31 feet; thence South 57 degrees 17 minutes 39 seconds East a distance of 63.21 feet; thence South 48 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds Hast a distance of 174.24 feet; thence South 75 degrees 03 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 27.25 feet; thence South 51 degrees 40 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 66.69 feet; thence South 65 degree.^ 42 minutes 13 seconds East a distance of 102.32 feet; (hence South 88 degrees 29 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 48.32 feet; thence South 49 degrees 38 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 26.75 feet; thence South 69 degrees 46 minutes 06 seconds East a distance of 207.72 feet; thence South 75 degrees 02 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 64.57 feet; thence South 68 degrees 03 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 66.77 feet; thence South 30 degrees 22 minutes 34 seconds East a distance of 100.00 feet and said line there terminating. P 9 FROM (FRI) 6. 25’99 15 :49/ST. 15 ;45/NO. 3700000072 P 10 Orono Which mlT ’’ '““'ed in Ulc Cily of a. b. the Norih side of Countj Road Ko. 6 Ironi a point due north of (he easterly boundarv of Co.!my roaZ-fd: a^'r’’® ■''' ’ TarnSrek Drive*'" "*'’* All located in Hennepin Couniv, Miiuiesoia. Mi 510477 02 n^PfrriNG REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JUN 2 6 1999 DATE: June 28. 1999 cn Y oi- uttoj^u ITEM NO.: /3 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer’s Report Item Description: No Parking Signs on Shadywood Road North of Narrows Bridge Attached you will find a letter from a resident on Shadywood Road, County Road 19, north of the Lake Minnetonka Narrows Bridge requesting the installation of "No Parking" signs. Cars parking in the right turning lanes in this area are creating a traffic safety hazard. Residents have stated in phone conversations that most of the problem is from users of the Pheasant Lawn Joint Dock complex. Dock users are parking along County Road 19. There is only one parking space available per dock, with the extra cars parking along the highway. Historically parking has not been a problem, but over the past several years has become a problem with cars parked along both sides of County Road 19. We have reviewed this situation and support the resident's concerns. The Orono Police Chief also supports the installation of no parking signs in this area. This issue has also been discussed with Hennepin County. The County also recognizes that a safety hazard exists and will install "No Parking" signs if requested by the City. We are recommending approval of the attached resolution requesting that Hennepin County install "No Parking" signs on County Road 19, north of the Lake Minnetonka Narrows Bridge. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve resolution requesting that Hennepin County install "No Parking" signs on County Road 19, north of the Lake Minnetonka Narrows Bridge. A RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON SHADYWOOD ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 19) as ShadywoodZd!^''®’ County Road 19, also known r«..co^ u the "City" and Hennepin County have concern regarding traffic safety StsBridge"^^^^^^ Minnetonka ♦h«t R THEMFORE, it is thereby resolved, that the "City" requests that Hennepin County mstaU and maintain "No Parking" signs on both sides of County Road 19 ri^t tur^g^Mes’ Minnetonka Narrows Bridge in the vicinity of the 28,1999.Adopted by the City CouncU of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held June ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk t • * June 22,1999 P.iEC'SiV’SD jun 2 3 1959 ^>VV4 '«>?’ Mr. Greg Gappa City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Greg: I am following up on your conversation with Dick Ogle regarding the parking and safety situation on the stretch of County Road 19/Shadywood Road, just north of the Narrows Bridge in Orono. I am writing on behalf of a group of Orono neighbors that live in the immediate area. There is currently a very significant safety risk on County Road 19, in the area indicated on the attached map. Unless something is done, we believe its just a matter of time before a very serious accident will happen in this area. As background, many years ago when the last major work was done on County Road 19, one of the residents in our area. General Rawlings, worked with the city and/or county to widen the road on both sides of County Road 19 on the northern side of the Narrows. The objective was to provide a deceleration lane so cars turning into the driveways on either side of 19 could get out of traffic, pull over safely, slow down and exit safely without disrupting traffic flow on 19. This was necessary because the approach to 19 is a hill and you can see cars for less than 100 yards from the entrance to the driveways. The deceleration lanes work well since they give people plenty of time to pull over and slow down without disrupting traffic flow on County Road 19. Early on, parking on 19 was not a problem, but over the past few years parking has become a problem in the deceleration lanes on both sides of the road. There are frequently cars parked along both sides of 19 and sometimes overnight or all weekend. When cars are parked along County Road 19 we are not able to safely get over and slow down to make a turn. Cars are forced to either stop on 19 before turning or slow down primarily on County Road 19 before turning. In either case, generally the cars behind pull across the center lane to get around the car turning, leaving less than 100 yards of clear visibility before the Narrows bridge. Cars coming north on County Road 19 are generally accelerating coming over the Narrows Bridge because they know the speed limit goes up to 40 on the north side of the bridge. This creates a situation where cars are speeding up coming over the bridge going towards cars that are speeding up to pass cars turning off County Road 19. Cars are accelerating towards each other with limited visibility in essentially the same lane! As residents of the area, we see how well the deceleration lanes work when they are clear and usable. We have also seen the extreme danger created when cars are parked in the deceleration lane, forcing us to turn directly off of 19. We have all witnessed “near misses” and do not want to see a serious accident or worse resulting from the parking problem. Parking was never intended for this section of County Road 19 and we would like to respectfully ask that the city permanently and officially designate the area as no parking. That designation will eliminate a major safety problem and provide peace of mind to the homeowners in the immediate area. Thank you very much for your prompt attention to this matter. Respectfully submitted. // JiixvZimnIimmerman (2745 Shadywood Rd.) on behalf of the homeowners on the north side of the ^ ^Tmows Bridge '*"*«*=J -------------------------------- ^ ^/A Olf ^ \ TWJTfx- V. qt//» PA9hrru^ €oAfp Aof^ *■ ~ 57 tr 7 ~-7CgnN» ^A>jg___ f J7<<* V ^7«#0 k \ /\e€A_/?cqu^^Tec> rtjft.^jJopAnX\hi0 ^jQttS A/Ai^Ae^e CTaOfJly ----------------^ I »x • *. * •••> I* . . J* ‘ • ’ »t f f . , • «•!* • f t ••'♦.• . ;•!•• *H |%1 . r I <»• ■ • . t-^,v %.-» jT )) 'WU COUMCIL MEETING JUN 2 s 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 28, 1999 Cl I Y uriU/\c ITEM NO Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer’s Report Item Description: Purchase of Water from Spring Park for Navarre Water Plant Rehabilitation During the Navarre Water Plant Rehabilitation, water for the Navarre system was supplied by the City of Spring Park. Because all of the pumps, piping, wiring and control systems in the plant were removed and replaced, it would have been ver}’ difficult to supply water through the treatment plant. With temporary piping configurations, we could have only supplied unfiltered water. This would have increased the project construction costs and time for completion. Also, the plant is small for the amount of filtering and softening equipment inplace, and working around a temporary piping system would have been extra difficult. Spring Park provides Iron and Manganese removal filtration for their water, so our users were provided with filtered water. Our temporary water would have been unfiltered and the high concentrations of Iron and Manganese in the water would have resulted in water quality problems and complaints. Even though the Spring Park water was filtered, we still received numerous complaints about the unsoitened water. The water sharing agreement between Orono and Spring Park contains a provision that any water sold between the Cities will be billed at the average of the two City s' rates. The average of the two Citys' rates is $1.93/1,000 Gallons. We used 38,599,892 gallons of water from October 1998 to May 1999 for a total cost of $74,523.07. Part of this cost is offset by the savings in operating costs such as electricity and chemicals from not pumping and treating the water. We are recommending payment of this bill to the City of Spring Park for purchase of water during the Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve payment of invoice from the City of Spring Park in the amount $74,523.07 for purchase of water during the Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation project with payment to be made from the Water Operating Fund, Line Item 601-49400-387 (Intergovernmental Services) with a budget adjustment completed to reflect this expendimre. 1 :iD •JU’i I 4 i9>9 Cn Y Or c.'.i'r.--. PMIM On Lakfi MlnnePonkfi Mayor Jerome R Rockvam 471-9515 June 10, 1999 Councilmembers Wm. D. Weeks 471-7285 Billed To; City of Orono Richard Oiea 47 1-7799 Water pumped 10-5-98 thru 5-18-99 i-j *^ Wldmer '4'^ ( 38,599,892 Gallons Thorr .Scanion 471-7 Extra DNR fee for over allocated water 74,496.07 27.00 Total Due $74,523.07 n\Vi8. ■fov' vvic etj'v'.flU AipY-rpy 2.3>0 5Q\\o«>r,5| ccimectiP' This is KP<7)So>^aU«^ 10 0 5ft^\£i'AS f •'L3]7pPp\p o V\ cy\^.yi ' 1. ^3 p 9^^hons, vt ’\\V pAok IS" To -Wit r<^^f hfAwP-fn •TNof Wo CiTvs "^oT WaOo'Tff IS I'U i h^:'0C \s \3\<V| 1, 00o^oS\^<^ Cit(f of Spring ?arK P.O.BOX 452,SPRING PARK,MINNESOTA 55384-0452 • Phone:471-9051 • Fax:471-9160 WILL NEED AN AGENDA REVISION TO ADD THIS TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 28, 1999 ITEM NO.: tA Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Change Order #1, Hamm Sewer Service Attached you will find Change Order Number 1 to the Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer project to install sewer to serve the Hamm property along Orono Orchard Road. This property is located just south of the Orono Orchards sewer project and this is the quickest and most cost effective method to complete this work. We are recommending Council approval of this change order. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Change Order Number 1. Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer project in the amount of $50,678.50 to Widmer Inc. for installation of the Hamm Sanitary Sewer service BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK ©6516361311 06/28/99 15:29 g :02/04 NO:930 Bonestroo Rosen* Amler lik A AssocJMes 4 AKhlitcii Oxtmer City ofOrono, 2750 KcHy PlcvfcV. PO Bo>t 66Crvitjd Bay. MN.Dat* Jiina P. I999 Contracior Widmer Inc, 42$0 Creekvicw Circle, PO Box 219 St Bonifa>;iu-<. MN, 5537S Bond- Ameneaiv CasimUv Company of Raadmi ■ PA. 222 S 9ih S». Mpla. MN. »440 Bund No i9Q 544914 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 ORONO ORCHARD SANITARY SEWER BRA File No. 139.98.101 Dctcription of Work Provide sewer service lo the Hamm propertj' Contract Unit Totnl No.Item Unit Quantity Price Amaunt Part 1 - Sanitary Sawar 1 8* PVC sanitary sewer. SDR 35.9-V deep LF 230 S36.00 S8.2I0.00 2 B' PVC sanitary sewer. SDR 33. B'-IO* deep LF 120 S36.00 S4.320.00 3 8' PVC sanitaiy sewer, SOR 35, lO’.IIdeep LF 135 S36.00 S4.I60.00 4 8' PVC sanitary sawer, SDR 33,12-I4 ’ deep LF IS a S36.00 SS40.00 S 4' diameter |anitary MH, t deep, includin| R*I642*B caaiins BA 4 si.soo.oo S6.000 00 6 MH depth greater than B‘ deep LF 6 SIOOOO S600 00 7 8' % 4' PVC or HDPE compatibU KrTioe wye bnneh 9 EA 3 rsoo S233.00 1 4 PVC aarvica pipe in place, SDR 26 LF 60 S8.00 S48Q.Q0 9 Improved pipe foundation in 6" increment depth LF 200 S2.00 1400.00 10 Mechanical trench compaction LF 500 S0.25 SI2S.Q0 11 Closed circuit TV inspection LF 500 SOSO S250 00 12 Connect to manhole EA 1 SI.300 00 SI.SOO.OO Total Part 1 • Santlaiy Sewar S3T.5iO.OO A BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK ©6516361311 06/28/99 15:29 0 :03/04 N0:930 C1«aipOriift ^ COUlMcl Unit Tm*I No.ItoM Uail Quantity Pries AaMMint f Part 2 - Rtitorttien 13 Remove bituminous povement SY 950 S075 $712.50 14 Common excavation (EV)CY 400 17.50 S3.000.QO 13 Aggregait base, Claai S, 100V« cruahtd TN 6 SO SIU.OO 16.300.00 16 Type 31 bituminous bast course TN i20 S30 00 $3,600.00 17 Type 41 A bituminous wearinf count TN 90 $31 00 12,790.00 18 Oeolcxtile Filler SY 1050 SI.OO $1,050.00 i9 Bituminous material for tack coat OL 100 SO 01 SI.OO 20 Bitominous driveway reatoration SY 90 SI050 $945 00 21 Soddipg, incl 4” topsoil SY 1300 $3 00 $3,900.00 22 Erosion control fence LF 300 $2 00 $600.00 Total Part 2 ^Restoration i * t2$.0M.5O Tout Part 1 • Sanitary Sowar t27,StOOO Total Port 2 • Restoration $2$.09t.S0 Total Bom Bid $$0,67190 1 BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK ® 6516361311 06/28/99 15:29 (3 :04/04 NO:930 BUNtiiTRO ROSENE ANDERWIK uo/o/yy uq: 19 u» .gc/wc ng.c.*H« brigmil Contncl Amount I'rcMoui Chwit* Ordtrt I hit Ch«nge Order Re\ lied Contract Amount (iacludiBg thii ohengo order) 1424.7 D.SO SO.OO $50,671.50 M75.105.00 Kc\*ommendcd for Approvel by: BONRSTROC. ROgCNE, ANDIRUK 4 ARlOClATtS, INC Approved by Contractor: WIOMCR. INC. .« l>wA«r C'enuecior HendlRi Coapiey I <|M zoa seo'QN Approved by Owom: CITY OF ORONO ncTSCfice sni tOAtn eeiae COuwcn k ^retinq JUN 2 fl 1999 Gl I » ui- UrtU/vu REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 25,1999 ITEM NO: /5" Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Conceptual Approval of Antenna on Navarre Water Tov/er The City has received a request from Bell South for the installation of a whip antenna for paging services on the City's Navarre water tower. There is sufficient space on the tower, and the antenna is compatible with the antennas already in place on the tower. The City will charge an annual fee of $5,700 for the space on the tower, and additional space on the ground for a control cabinet. Bell South has requested conceptual approval of the antenna installation prior to moving to the next step, which is finalizing the lease agreement. The lease agreement will be brought back to the Council for final approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the installation of a whip antenna for paging services on the City's Navarre water tower by Bell South, subject to working out a lease agreement acceptable to the City and Bell South. 1 COIlMcii JUN 2 6 ^999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 25,1999 QH ur unuiMO ITEM NO: /(^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Resignation of Bruce Vang from His Building Inspector Position Bruce Vang has resigned from his position as Building Inspector with the City, effective June 14, 1999. Bruce is taking time away from City employment to complete a number of construction projects. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; Motion to accept the resignation of Bruce ^'ang from his position as Building Inspector, effective June 14,1999. 1 • i COUNCIL MEETING JUN 2 fl 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; June 24,1999 Cl IY UhUni(j ITEM NO:1 Department Approval: Name Lin Vee ^ Title City Clerk/ Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval Agenda Section : Licenses CIGARETTE LICENSE 1.Spring Hill Golf Course Timothy Ivory 725 Sixth A/enue North COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. 1. 2. 3. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. Id4, Second Series - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to; City of Orono Mailing address; ’ P.O. Box 66 , Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31)C - 7-9^ DATE A^licant'u Full Name _________________ FIRST ! K. MIDDLE LAST f Applicant's Home Addres s 3to DAt frAauC. PI. HOUSE NUWER OsJ.MaL STREET HOME PHONE CITY STATE Applicant's Business &>IS Clufi ___ TYPE OF BUSINESS hbll Ay/'f Cl(^8 BUSINESS NAME '7<35^^644.A4y H4_(^____ All AnnprcQ f (s(3 - H2I=J^o6 BUSINESS PHONE fil (o STREET ADDRESS MfjyOb MAILING ADDRESS Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place. Pxe^nBei _QA4^eyui_^ I HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO, TOBACCO PRODUCTS OR DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAm^^ ordinances OF THE CITY OF ORONO. . Signature ~C.tuA Date 77>e issuance of a Bcensa tmder this ordinance shall be considared a prMlaga and not a^bsolula right of the applicant and shall not enb'tle the holder to an automatic renewal of the Ocense. 1211ST.3 14 Jun 1999 Mon 12:02 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Humber Employee Name Check Humber 046103 046103 PETERSON, BARBARA A. Totals Check Number 046103 Check Humber 046104 046104 MOORSE, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046104 Check Number 046105 046105 FLINT, RICHARD Totals Check Number 046105 Check Number 046106 046106 JABBODR, GABRIEL E. Totals Check Number 046106 Check Number 046107 046107 KELLEY, CHARLES Totals Check Number 046107 Check Number 046108 046108 SANSBVBRE, ROBERT K. Totals Check Number 046108 Grand Total Check Date 14-JUA-99 14-Jun-99 14-Jun-99 14 -Jun-99 14-Jun-99 14-Jun-99 Page 1 Check Amount 269.36 269.36 164.70 184.70 269.36 269.36 323.22 323.22 269.36 269.36 269.36 269.36 1,585.36 meeting JUH 2 8 1999 i ll .1 r 16 Jun 1999 Ned 10t07 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Pate Name Check Number 59152 59152 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 16-Jun-99 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Totals Check Number 59152 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Number 59153 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 59153 59153 59153 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OP LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OP LAKES Totals Check Number 59153 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Check Number 59154 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. 59154 16-Jun-99 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. Totals Check Number 59154 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO Check Number 59155 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 59155 16-Jun-99 ICMA RETIRO®IT TRUST - 457 Totals Check Number 59155 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Chech Number 59156 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 59156 16-Jun-99 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Totals Check Number 59156 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Check Number 59157 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT 59157 16-Jun-99 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Totals Check Number 59157 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Check Number 59150 MN DEPT OP REVENUE 59158 16-Jun-99 MN DEPT OP REVQIUE Totals Check Number 59158 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Check Number 59159 MN MUTUAL LIFE 59159 16-Jun-99 MN MUTUAL LIFE Totals Check Number 59159 MN MUTUAL LIFE Check Number 59160 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP 59160 16-Jun-99 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP Totals Check Number 59160 WN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP Transaction Amount 7,339.00 7,339.00 3,474.09 3,474.09 8,185.32 15,133.50 800.68 800.68 275.00 275.00 462.00 462.00 179.51 179.51 3,464.83 3,464.83 703.00 703.00 227.00 227.00 Page l Comments SAVINGS W/H a TRANSFERRED PICA 6 MEDICARE W/H FICA,MEDCR CITY SHARD FEDERAL WITHHOLDING DEFERRED COMP W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H UNION DUES WH SKREEN 80*010755723 STATE TAX W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H Check Register City of Orono r* * 16 Jun 1999 Ked 10t07 AM Check Number Date Name 59160 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP 59161 PEBSCO/OBRA 16-Jun-9 9 PEBSCO/OBRA Totals Check Number 59161 *?EBSCO/OBRA Check Number 59162 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 59162 16-Jun-99 PEBSCO/OS CONF OF MAYORS Totals Check Number 59162 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS Check Number 59163 pera Page 2 Check Number Check Number 59161 59163 59163 16-JUn-99 16-Jun-99 PERA pera Totals Check Number 59163 PERA Check Number 59164 UNITED WAY 59164 16-Jun-99 UNITED WAY Totals Check Number 59164 UNITED WAY Qrand Total ■ I Transaction Amount 256.93 256.93 2,421.50 2,421.50 4.436.00 5.872.00 10,308.80 31.00 31.00 41,602.75 Comments OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/K USCM DEFERRED COMP W/H PERA EMPLOYEE W/H PERA CITY SHARE CHARITY DONATIONS W/H 16 JUn 1999 Hed 8:20 AM Check Register City of Orono Check ' >er Employee Nrjne Check Number 046112 046112 JOHNSON, MARY ANN Totals Check Number 046112 Check Number 046113 046113 KASEMAN, CAROLE A. Totals Check Nuinber 046113 Qieck Number 046114 046114 MOORSE, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046114 Check Nufld>ei 046115 046115 VBB, LINDA S. Totals Check Number 046115 Check Numbez 046116 046116 ICUBHN, THOMAS M. Totals Check Number 046116 Check Number 046117 046117 OLSON. RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046117 Check Number 046218 046118 PaTVlT. SANDRA K. Totals Check Number 046118 Check Number 046119 046119 ANDERSON. BRUCF L. Totals Check Number 046119 Check Number 046120 046120 BOBZIEN. SUE A. Totals Check Number 046120 Check Date 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 l5.jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jan-99 16-Jun-99 Page 1 Check Amount 599.88 599.88 791.65 791.65 1.578.85 1.578.85 1.092.29 1.092.29 1.005.84 1.005.84 34.66 34.66 772.71 772.71 500.39 500.39 839 82 839.82 16 Jun 1999 Med 8:30 AM Check Register City of Orono 1. Employee Name Check Number 046121 046121 BORIS. SCOTT N Totals Check Number 046121 Check Number 046122 046122 CARLSON. MICHAEL B. Totals Check Number 046122 Check Number 046123 046123 CHESNICK. GARY B. Totals Check Number 046123 Check Number 046124 046124 CORNICK. JAMBS L. Totals Check Number 046124 Check Number 046125 046125 DBMBOUSKI. JAY C. Totals Check Number 046125 Check Number 046126 046126 ERlCrPr^. KURT R Totals Check Number 046126 Check Number 046127 046127 PARNIOK. CORRBY L. Totals Check Number 046127 Check Number 046128 046128 PISCHBNICH. DAN T. Totals Check Number 046128 Check Number 046129 046129 FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K. Totals Check Number 046129 f* ck Number 046130 Check Date 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-JUa-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 Page 2 Check Amount 1.109.94 1.109.94 270.35 270.35 1.484.73 1.484.73 1,392.78 1,392.78 1,514.51 1,514.51 1.248.91 1.248.91 1,322.78 1,322.78 1,222.93 1,222.93 965.94 965.94 16 Jun 1999 iced 8}20 AM Check Register City of Orono u* .«Der Employee Name Check Number 04613C 046130 HANSINO, CAROL J. Totals Check Number 046130 Check Number 046131 046131 JOHNSON, JEFFREY Totals Qieck Number 046131 Check Number 046132 046132 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 046132 Check Number 046133 046133 MAD60M, ADRIENNE M. Totals Check Number 046133 Check Number 046134 046134 MCNALLY, STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 046134 Check Number 046135 046135 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L. Totals Check Number 046135 Check Number 046136 046136 M0R0NCZYN8KI, JAMES Totals Check Number 046136 Check Number 046137 046137 PERSELL, WILLIAM R. Totals Check Number 046137 Check Number 046138 046138 SCHOBNHOFP, JOHN B. Totals Check Number 046138 r -!k NUnd^r 046139 Check Date 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 Page 3 Check Amount 1,598.05 1,598.05 685.93 685.93 1.311.88 1.311.88 147.72 147.72 478.92 478.92 706.20 706.20 1,510.37 1,510.37 288.60 288.60 1,274.65 1,274.65 16 Jun 1999 Med 8:20 AM Check Register City of Orono •!k I. .^r Employee Name Check Number 046139 046139 TOMCHECK, LAMRENCE F. Totals Check Number 046139 Check Number 046140 046140 TOMCZYK, MARK H. Totals Check Number 046140 Check Number 046141 046141 NITTKE, ANTHONY A. Totals Check Number 046141 Check Number 046142 046142 HOBCHST, ROBYN A. Totals Check Number 046142 Check Number 046143 046143 KOCZUR, JASON R. Totals Check Number 046143 Check Number 046144 046144 BOTTBNBBRQ* MENDY C. Totals Check Number 046144 Oieck Number 046145 046145 OAFFRON, MICKABL P. Totals Check Number 046145 Check Number 046146 046146 OAPPA, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 046146 Check Number 046147 046147 OMAN, LYLE B. Totals Check NUmber 046147 r* rk Number 046148 Check Date 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-JUn-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-JUn-99 Page 4 Check Amount 260.31 260.31 1,258.74 1,258.74 494.82 494.82 570.09 570.09 297.69 297.69 650.04 650.04 1,161.19 1,161.19 1,565.93 1,565.93 248.55 24S.S5 16 Jun 199$ Hed 8:20 AM Check Register City of Orono ' -.k 4 jDer Employee Name Check Number 046148 046148 VANG, BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 046148 Check Number 046149 046149 HECKMAN* STEPHEN J. Tc cals Check Number 046149 Check Number 046150 046150 WEINBERGER* PAUL E. Totals Check Number 046150 Check NUnO-ar 046151 046151 BRINXKAUS* JOHN P. Totals Check Number 046151 Check Number 046152 046152 rSBAERE* DONALD L. Totals Check Number 046152 Check Number 046153 046153 GREGORY* JAMES D. Totals Check Number 046153 Check Number 046154 046154 HANSEN* STEVEN C. Totals Oieck Number 046154 Check Number 04t155 046155 OBBRAIGNBR* SCOTT G. Totals Check Number 046155 ChecK Number 046156 046156 OBRIEN* RANDY L. Totals Check Number 046156 r* *ck Number 046157 Check Date 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 Page 5 Check Amount 993.71 993.71 70.19 70.19 680.23 660 23 1*115.06 1*115.06 882.91 882.91 785.71 735.71 649.78 649.78 782.39 782.39 221.20 221.20 J 16 JUn 1999 Wed 8:20 AM ' » Bnployee Namd Qieck Number 046157 046157 PALMER, GREGOR! A. Totals Check Nu*nber 046157 Check Register City of orono Page 6 Check Date lC-Jun-99 Check Amount 642.41 642.41 Check Number 046158 046158 RATHBUN, BARRY J. Totala Check Number 046158 Check Number 046159 046159 8KREEN, DALE S. Totals Check Number 046159 i6-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 1,074.11 1,074.11 639.59 639.59 Check Number C46160 046160 ABRAHAMSON, FRED H. Totals Check Number 046160 Check Number 046161 046161 BLAIR, JANIS A. Totals Check Number 046161 Check Number 046162 046162 DCC1CEN, THOMAS H. Totals Check Number 046162 Check Humber 046163 046163 MCINTYRE, WILLIAM E. Totals Check Number 046163 Check Number 046164 046164 OAS, DANIEL O. Totals Check Number 046164 Check Number 046165 046165 PETERSON, JACK W. Totals Check Number 046165 t* *ck Number 046166 16-Jun-99 16-JUn-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun-99 16-Jun>99 146.41 146.41 125.42 125.42 410.44 410.44 168.33 168.33 260.62 260.62 396.72 396.72 -.f 16 Jun 1909 Hed 8:20 AM Oieck Register City of Orono Page 7 t%. .uoer Employee Name Check Date Check Amount Check Number 046166 046166 RAICHB, VICTORIA H.16-Jun-99 79.31 .1 ’ k 3S Jun 1999 Check Register Page Fri 3:06 PM City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 59166 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS 59166 24-Jun-99 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS 79.88 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE Totals Check Number 59166 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS 79.88 Check Number 59167 AT 6t T WIRELESS SERVICES 59167 24-Jun-99 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 32.93 CELL PHONE SERVICE 59167 25-Jun-99 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 10.68 CELL PHONE SERVICE 59167 25-Jun-99 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 10.68 CELL PHONE SERVICE 59167 25-Jun-99 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 140.52 CELL PHONE SERVICE Totals Check Number 59167 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 202.81 Check Number 59160 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 59168 24-Jun-99 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 66.64 HOT DOGS, CHEESEBGR 59168 25-Jun-99 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 51.84 HOT DOGS, CHSBRGRS Totals Check Number 59168 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 110.48 Check Number 59169 BANYON DATA SYSTEMS 59169 24-Jun-99 BANYON DATA SYSTEMS 223.75 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT 59169 24-Jun-99 BANYON DATA SYSTEMS 671.25 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT 59169 24-Jun-99 BANYON DATA SYSTEMS 2,427.64 ANNUAL SOFTWARii SUPPORT Totals Check Number 59169 ..ANYON DATA SYSTEMS 3,322.64 Check Number 59170 BCA/TRAIMINC; (. DEVELOPMENT 59170 24-Jun-99 BCA/TRAININU h DEVELOPMENT 40.00 LGL ASPCTS LAW ENF-DEIffiOU 59170 24-Jun-99 BCA/TRAINING k DEVELOPMENT 40.00 LGL APCTS-MOROWCZYNSKI Totals Check Number S9170 BCA/TRAINING k DEVELOPMENT 80.00 Check Number 59171 BIFFS INC. 59171 25-Jun-99 BIFFS INC.66.76 PORTABLE - GC 39171 25-Jun-99 BTFFS INC.133.52 PORTABLE • HACKBSRRY 59171 25-Jun-99 BIFFS INC.133.52 PORTABLE • BIDERWOOD 59171 25-Jun-S9 BIFFS INC.133.52 PORTABLE • SUMMIT BEACH Totals Check Number 59171 BIFFS INC.467.32 Check Nunber 59172 BLACKOWIAK k SON 59172 24-Jun-99 BLACKOWIAK a SON 157.80 SOLID WST SRV-LAXE 59172 24-Jun-99 BLACKOWIAK a SON 158.98 SOLID WST SRV-BEDERWOOD 59172 24-Jun-99 BLACKOWIAK a SON 72.33 SOLID WST SRV-GOLF COURSE 59172 24-Jun-99 BLACKOWIAK a SON 105.45 SOLID WST SRV-CH t I’ 25 Jun 1999 Fri 3:06 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59172 59172 BLACKOHIAK L SON 24-Jun-99 BLACKOWIAK k SON Totals Check Number 59172 BLACKOWIAK k SON Check Number 59173 BOBZIEN, SUE 59173 24-Jun-99 BOBZIEN, SUE Totals Check Number 59173 riOBZIEN, SUE Check Number 59174 BOIIESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC. 59174 25-Jun-99 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC. Totals Check Number 59174 BONESTROO ROSENE & ASSOC. Check Number 59175 BUDGET PRINTING 59175 24-Jun-99 BUDGET PRINTING Totals Check Number 59175 BUDGET PRINTING Check Number 59176 CITY OF MOUND 59176 24-Jun-99 CITY OF MOUND Totals Check Number 59176 CITY OF MOUND Check Number 59177 CITY OF SPRING PARK 59177 25-Jun-99 CITY OF SPRING PARK Totals Check Number 59177 CITY OF SPRING PARK Check Number 59178 CULLIGAN 59178 24-Jun-99 CULLIGAN Totals Check Number 59178 CULLIGAN Check Number 59179 DCA 59179 24-Jun-99 DCA Totals Check Number 59179 DCA Check Number 59180 DCA - HIRE ONLY 59180 24-Jun-99 DCA - WIRE ONLY Totals Check Number 59180 OCA - HIRE ONLY Check Number 59181 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE-NOTRN Transaction Amount 86.27 580.83 34.99 34.99 129.00 129.00 211.63 211.63 24,873.00 24,873.00 74,523.07 74,523.07 6.00 6.00 77.00 77.00 120.49 120.49 Page 2 Comments SOLID HST SRV-PD UNIFORM PANTS SAGA HILL PARK ACCESS REPORT COVERS k TABS 3RD QTR FIRE SERVICES PURCH WTR - NVR SYSTSf SOFTENER SERVICE COBRA ADM FEES SPENDING ACCOUNTS 6/13/99 25 Jun 1999 Frl 3:06 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Transaction Check Namber 59102 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP 59102 24-Jun-99 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP Totals Check Number 59182 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP Check Number 59183 DOYLE INC. 59183 59163 25-Jun-99 25-Jun-99 DOYLE INC. DOYLE INC. Totals Check Number 59183 DOYLE INC. Check Number 59184 EARL F. ANDERSON 6 ASSOC. 59184 24-Jun-99 EARL F. ANDERSON & ASSOC, Totals Check Nundjer 59184 earl f. anderson a assoc Check Number 59185 ERLUND TREE RECYCLING 59185 59185 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 erlund tree recycling ERLUND TREE RECYCLING Totals Check Number 59185 ERLUND TREE RECYCLING Check Number 59186 ELDREDGE TRADING, INC 59186 59186 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 ELDREDGE TRADING, INC ELDREDGE TRADING, INC Totals Check Number 59186 ELDREDGE TRADING, INC Check Number 59187 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS 59187 24-Jun-99 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS Totals Cheek Number 59187 embedded systefs Check Number 59180 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 59188 24-Jun-99 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC totals Check Number 59188 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 59189 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMSCheck Number 141.40 141.40 95.65 -53.99 41.66 239.96 239.96 304.00 55.11 359.11 267.45 596.75 864.20 210.00 210.00 88.72 88.72 Page 3 ‘Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 59181 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE-NOTRN 59181 24-Jun-99 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE-NOTRN 40.00 NOTARY COMMISSION FEB 59101 24-Jun-99 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE-NOTRN 40.00 NOTARY COMMISSION FEB 59181 24-Jun-99 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE-NOTRN 40.00 NOTARY COMMISSION FEE 59181 24-Jun-9S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE-NOTRN 40.00 NOTARY COMMISSION FEE Totals Check Number 59101 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE-NOTRT;160.00 PHONE SERVICE 4/3/99 FLAIL BLADES, CLEVIS FLAIL BLADES RETURN SIGN POSTS BRUSH DISPOSAL MATS - PD STAFF SHIRTS SHIRTS FOR RESALE ANNUAL SIREN MAINT REPAIRS SQD 185 25 Jun 1999 Fri 3:05 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 4 Check Number Date Name Check Number 59169 59189 59189 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS 24- Jun-99 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS 25- Jun-99 ENGINEERING RJPRO SYSTEMS Totals Check Number 59189 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS Check Number 59190 EXPRESS MESSENGER 59190 24-Jun-99 EXPRESS MESSENGER Totals Check Number 59190 EXPRESS MESSENGER Check Number 59191 FEDEX 59191 24-Jun-99 FEDEX Totals Check Number 59191 FEDEX Check Number 59192 FORTIS BENEFITS 59192 59192 25-Jun-99 25-Jvn-99 FORTIS BEFITS FORTIS BENEFITS Totals Check Number 59192 FORTIS BENEFITS Check Number 59193 G (. K SERVICES 59193 59193 59193 59193 59193 59193 59193 59193 59193 59193 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 24- Jun-99 25- Jun-99 G a K SERVICES Q L K SERVICES G C. X SERVICES O a K SERVICES G a X SERVICES Q a X SERVICES G a X SERVICES G a X SERVICES G a X SERVICES G a X SERVICES Totals Check Number 59193 G a X SERVICES Check Number 59194 GALL'S INC. 59194 24-Jun-99 GALL'S INC. Totals Check Number 59194 GALL'S INC. Cheek Number 59195 genuine parts co. 59195 24-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO. Totals Check Number 59195 GENUINE PARTS CO. Check Number 59196 59196 GREGORY* JAMES 25-Jun-99 GREGORY* JAMES Transaction Amount 9.59 13.42 23.01 14.47 14.47 5.50 5.50 39.49 724.25 763.74 Comments REPRODUCTION SCAN TO PLOT DELIVERY TO EDINA REALTY DEL TO POLICE CARS UNLMTD DISABILITY INSURANCE DISABILITY INSURANCE 8.52 UN IFOM - STEFFENHAGEN 14.02 UNIFORM-RATHBUN 6.52 UNIFORM-STEFFENHAGEN 86.36 UNIFORMS 29.34 SHOP TOWELS 112.15 UNIFORMS 14.02 UNIFORM-RATHBUN 42.01 MATS - ADM 42.01 MATS - CNCL 55.11 MATS - PD 412.08 70.97 SHIRTS -C31ESWICX 70.97 • 17.56 PLIERS 17.56 88.00 SOD 25 Jun 1999 Fri 3:06 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59196 GREGORY, JAMES Totals Check Number 59196 GREGORY, JAMES Check Number 59197 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER 59197 59197 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER HAMEL BUILDING CENTER Totals Check Number 59197 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER Check Number 59198 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP 59190 25-Jun-99 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP Totals Check Number 59199 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP Check Number 59199 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. 59199 59199 25-Jun-99 25-Jun-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS Totals Check Number 59199 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS Check Number 59200 IMAGINALITY 59200 25 Jun-99 IMAGINALITY Totals Check Number 59200 IMAGINALITY Check Number 59201 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY 59201 24-Jun-99 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY Totals Check Number 59201 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY Check Number 59202 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS 59202 24-Jun-99 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS Totals Check Number 59202 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS Check Number 59203 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT 59203 24-Jun-99 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 59203 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT Check Number 59204 LOGIS 59204 25-Jun-99 LOGIS Totals Check Number 59204 LOGIS Transaction Amount 88.00 260.02 548.13 808.15 70.04 70.04 150.00 150.00 300.00 708.23 708.23 29.36 29.36 97.00 97.00 60.39 60.39 958.38 958.38 Page 5 Comments WOOD FOR DOCKS REPAIRS-CRYSTAL BAY PLGND HYDROFLUOSILICIC ACID LABELS - FERNDALE RD LABELS - FERNDALE RO REPLACE TEE SIGN FOLDER, ADD MACH TAPE EMP hDV - ADM SUPPORT SEAL, GASKETS PIMS APPLIC APRIL 25 Jun 1999 Fri 3:06 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 6 Check Number Date Name Check Number 59205 59205 59205 LONG LAKE BIO A AUTO PARTS 24-Jun-99 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 24-Jun-99 LONG LAKE BIO A AUTO PARTS Totals Check Number 59205 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS Check Number 59206 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT 59206 25-Jun-99 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 59206 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT Check Number 59207 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 59207 24-Jun-99 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 59207 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Check Number 59208 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 59200 24-Jun-99 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 59200 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT Check Number 59209 MASUNE COMPANY 59209 25-Jun-99 MASUNE COMPANY Totals Check Number 59209 MASUNE COMPANY Check Number 59210 MAVO SYSTEMS 59210 24-Jun-99 MAVO SYSTEMS Totals Check Number 59210 MAVO SYSTEMS Check Number 59211 MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING 59211 24-Jun-99 MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING Totals Check Number 59211 MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING Check Number 59213 HEDICA CHOICE 59213 25-Jun-99 MEDICA CHOICE 59213 25-Jun-99 MEDICA CHOICE 59213 25-Jun*99 MEDICA CHOICE 59213 25-Jun-99 MEDICA CHOICE 59213 2S-Jun-99 MEDICA CHOICE 59213 2S-Jun-99 MEDICA CHOICE 59213 2S-Jun-99 MEDICA CHOICE 59213 2S-Jun-99 MEDICA CHOICE Transaction Amount 14.02 16.53 30.55 10.59 10.59 53.25 53.25 52.73 52.73 93.15 93.15 600.00 600.00 60.02 60.02 Comments FILTER, CLEVIS PIN MISC VEH SUPPLIES FULE CAP EQUIP RNTL-TREE PLNTG SEAL KIT - SWEEPER BANDAGES, WIPES ASBSTOS FLR TILE REMOVAL DIRECTORY ADVERTISING 170.55 HEALTH INS 7/99 357.11 HEALTH INS 7/99 178.56 HEALTH INS 7/99 603.52 HEALTH INS 7/99 357.11 HEALTH INS 7/99 357.11 HEALTH INS 7/99 3.035.40 HEALTH INS 7/99 714.22 HEALTH INS 7/99 • 35 Jun 1999 Prl 3s06 PM • Check Number Date Check Number 59213 MEDICA 59213 25-Jun-99 59213 25-Jun-99 59213 25-Jun-99 59213 25-Jun-99 59213 25-Jun-99 59213 25-Jun-99 Check Register City of Orono Name MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE Totals Check Number 59213 MEDICA CHOICE Check Number 59214 MGCSA 59214 24-Jun-99 MGCSA Totals Check Number 59214 MGCSA Check Number 59215 MIDNEST ASPHALT 59215 59215 59215 59215 24-Jun-99 24- Jun-99 25- Jun-99 25-Jun-99 MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT Totals Check Number 59215 midwest asphalt Check Number 59216 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 59216 59216 74-Jun-99 25-Jun-99 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Totals Check Number 59216 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Number 59217 MINNEAPOLIS COM k TECH COLLEGE 59217 59217 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 MINNEAPOLIS COM k TECH COLLEGE MINNEAPOLIS COM k TECH COLLEGE Totals Check Number 59217 MINNEAPOLIS COM k TECH COLLEGE Check Number 59218 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 59218 24-Jun-99 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Totals Check Number 59218 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Check Number 59219 MINNESOTA CRIME ALERT NETWORK 59219 24-Jun-99 MINNESOTA CRIME ALERT NETWORK Totals Check Number 54219 MINNESOTA CRIME ALERT NETWORK Check Number 59220 MINNESOTA DEPT. OF REVENUE 59220 25-Jun-99 MINNESOTA DEPT. OF REVENUE Transaction Amount 20.00 20.00 374.94 576.39 104.76 1,137.80 2,193.89 787.55 331.45 1,119.00 285.00 285.00 570.00 27.00 27.00 12.00 12.00 Page 7 Comments 170.55 HEALTH INS 7/99 1,249.86 HEALTH INS 7/99 178.56 HEALTH INS 7/99 178.55 HEALTH INS 7/99 915.23 HEALTH INS 7/99 8,495.24 HEALTH INS 7/99 16,977.57 STEFFENHAGEN 6/7 MEETING HAND PATCH HAND PATCH HAND PATCH HAND PATCH SOFT DRINKS SOFT DRINKS FIELD TRNING-DEMBOUSKI FIELD TRNING-FARNIOK ACETLYENE, OXYGEN ANNUAL MBRSHIP FEE 19.00 SALES TAX 25 Jun 1999 Fri 3:06 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59220 59220 MINNESOTA DEPT. OF REVENUE 25-Jun-99 MINNESOTA DEPT. OF REVENUE Totals Check Number 59220 MINNESOTA DEPT. OF REVENUE Check Number 59221 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 59221 59221 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 MN DEPT OF HEALTH MN DEPT OF HEALTH Totals Check Number 59221 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Check Number 59222 MR augies coffee service 59222 24-Jun-99 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE Totals Check Number 59222 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE Check Number 59223 MTI DIST CO. 59223 59223 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 MTI DIST CO MTI DIST CO Totals Check Number 59223 MTI DIST CO. 59225 25-Jun-99 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS Totals Check Number 59225 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS Check Number 59226 NEOPOST 59226 24-Jun-99 NEOPOST Totals Check Number 59226 NEOPOST Check Number 59227 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE 59227 24-Jun-99 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE Totals Check Number 59227 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE Transaction Amount 7.00 26.00 23.00 23.00 46.00 49.50 49.50 178.92 48.89 227.81 108.00 108.00 1,159.79 1,159.79 735.00 735.00 Page 8 Comments SALES TAX OPERATOR'S LIC-BRINKHAUS OPERATOR'S LIC-HANSEN COFFEE BALL WASHER, BASKET CAN COVERS, DECALS Check Number 59224 NAVARRE HARDWARE 59224 24-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 9.10 TAPE, ENAMEL 59224 24-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 4.24 CLR BOTTLE 59224 24-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 26.61 SCALE 59224 25-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 12.65 WTR METER SHLF 59224 25-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 21.29 DRAIN SPADE 59224 25-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 29.31 LOCATES - 5/99 59224 25-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 87.94 LOCATES - 5/99 Totals Check Number 59224 NAVARRE HARDWARE 191.14 Check Number 59225 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS - CITY HAL PERA LIFE 7/99 METER RENTAL 6/29/99-00 PTAC-OSHA TRAINING 25 Jim 1999 Fri 3:06 PN Check Number Check Number 59228 Date Name Check Register City of Orono 59220 NORTH STAR TURF 25-Jun-99 NORTH STAR TURF Totals Check Number 59220 NORTH STAR TURF Transaction Amount 68.42 68.42 Page 9 Comments SWITCH ASSEMBLY Check Number 59229 59229 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC. 25-Jun-99 Totals Check Number OLD DUTCH FOODS INC. 59229 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC. Check Number 5923(1 59230 PIONEER 24-Jun-99 PIONEER Totals Check Number 59230 PIONEER 20.16 20.16 52.14 52.14 CHIPS PRINT ADVERTISING Check Number 59231 PROLAWNS 59231 59231 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 Totals Check Number PROLAWNS PROLAWNS 59231 PROLAWNS 205.00 1.105.00 1.310.00 FERTILIZE 6 WEED CONTRL FERTILIZE k WEED CONTRL Check Number 59232 PROTECTION ONE 59232 25-Jun-99 Totals Check Number PROTECTION ONE 59232 PROTECTION ONE Check Number 59233 RC IDENTIFICATIONS 168.99 168.99 3RD QUARTER MONITORING 59233 25-Jun-99 Totals Check Number RC IDENTIFICATIONS 59233 RC IDENTIFICATIONS 9.59 9.59 EMP ID CARDS Check Number 59234 REED VENDING 59234 59234 59234 25-Jun-99 25-Jun-99 25-Jun-99 Totals Check Number REED VENDING REED VENDING REED VENDING 59234 REED VENDING Check Number 59235 59235 RICKS SUPERVALUE 24-Jun-99 Totals Check Number RICKS SUPERV.ILUE 59235 RICKS SUPERVi LUE Check Number 59236 59236 SCHARBER li SONS 24-Jun-99 Totals Check Number SCHARBER k SONS 59236 SCHARBER k SONS 68.60 70.40 113.20 252.20 6.41 6.41 16.06 16.06 CANDY, ROLLS CANDY, ROLLS CANDY, ROLLS PLANTS TOGGLE 5WTCH 25 Jun 1999 Fri 3:06 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name 59236 SCHARBER & SONS 59237 SCHOENHOFF. JOHN 24-Jun-99 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN Totals Check Number 59237 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN Check Number 59238 SNYDER DRUG STORES Check Number .. Check Number 59237 Check Number 59239 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC. 59239 24-Jun-99 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC. Totals Check Number 59239 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC. Check N^*mber 5924 0 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH 59240 24-Jun-99 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH Totals Check Number 59240 STA-SAFE locksmith Check Number 59241 STAR TRIBUNE 59241 24-Jun-99 STAR TP.tqUNE Totals Clieck Humber 59241 STAR TRIBUNE Check Number 59242 STATE OF MN CPV PROGRAM 59242 25-Jun-99 STATE OF MN CPV PROGRAM Totals Check Number 59242 STATE OF MN CPV PROGRAM Check Number 59243 SUN NEWSPAPERS 59243 59243 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 SUN NEWSPAPERS SUN NEWSPAPERS Totals Check Number 59243 SUN newspapers Check Humber 59244 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 59244 24-Jun-99 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO Transaction Amount 105.00 105.00 195.00 195.00 65.00 65.00 937.50 937.50 350.00 350.00 231.20 81.60 312.80 350.00 1 Page 10 Comments UNIFORM SHOES 59238 24-Jun-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 2.44 FIL*M DEVLPNG 59238 24-Jun-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 20.96 SUPPLIES 59238 24-Jun-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 34.58 FILM, DEVELOPING . 59238 24-Jun-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 7.90 FILM DEVELOPING 59238 24-Jun-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 3.14 CARD 59238 24-Jun-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 53.83 BATTERIES 59238 24-Jun-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 23.41 FILM 59238 24-Jun-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES 14.75 COLD PAKS Totals Check Number 59238 SNYDER DRUG STORES 161.01 TH 12 RELOCATION-PHASE 2 i LOCK REPAIR-NORTH WTR PLT BMP ADV - SEPTIC INSP CPV MEMBERSHIP 7/1/99-00 ADV FOR EMPLOyMEMT-ADM BMP ADV - PT CLERK TEMP HELP-GALLUS 6/13/99 25 Jun 1999 Fri 3:06 PM Check Number C^eck Register City of Orono Date Name Transaction /^ount Page ll Comments Check Number 59244 59244 59244 59244 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 2 5-Jun-9 9 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 25-Jun-99 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 25-Jun-99 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO Totals Check Number 59244 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 523.13 396.88 1,000.00 2,270.01 TEMP HELP-WK END 6/20/99 TEMP HELP-WK END 6/20/99 EMP CONVERSION FEE Check Number 59245 THOMTON, MARK 59245 25-Jun-99 Totals Check Number THOMTON, MARK 59245 THOMTON, MARK 100.00 100.00 FIN EXCTION OF RLSE AGREE Check Number 59246 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 59246 59246 24- Jun-99 25- Jun-99 Totals Check Number TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 59246 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 5.89 51.39 57.28 MONTHLY CYLINDER RENTAL TORCH ATTACHMENT Check Number 59247 59247 59247 59247 TRACY TRIPP FUELS 24-Jun-99 24- Jun-99 25- Jun-99 Totals Check Number TRACY TRIPP FUELS TRACY TRIPP FUELS TRACY TRIPP FUELS 59247 TRACY TRIPP FUELS 130.62 55.11 2,609.26 2,794.99 UNLEADED & DIESEL HOSE & NOZZLE 2804 UNLEADED Check Number 59248 59248 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 24-Jun-99 Totals Check Number TREADWAY GRAPHICS 59248 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 72.56 72.56 BOTTLES, MUGS - DARE Check Number 59250 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 5.60 LIFE INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 4.20 LIFE INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 25.20 LIFE INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 4.20 LIFE INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 1.40 LIFE INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 11.20 LIFE INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 2.80 LIFE INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 1.40 LIFE INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 10.80 LIFE INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 349.70 LIFE INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 1.20 AD&D INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 0.90 AD&D INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 5.40 ADfitD INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 0.90 ADfcD INSURANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 0.30 AD 6 D INSORANCE 7/99 59250 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE -LIFE 2.40 AD &D INSURANCE 7/99 25 Jun 1999 Fri 3:06 PM Check Number Check Number 59250 59250 59250 59250 Check Register City cr Orono Page 12 Date Name 59250 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 25-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE Transaction Amount 0.60 0.30 6.60 79.50 Totals Check Number 59250 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 514.60 Comments AD a D INSURANCE 7/99 AD a D INSURANCE 7/99 AD a D INSURANCE 7/99 AD a D INSURANCE 7/99 Check Number 59251 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 59251 59251 59251 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 Totals Check Number US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 59251 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 932.47 31.08 72.52 1,036.07 PHONE SERVICE 6/99 PHONE SERVICE 6/99 PHONE SERVICE 6/99 Check Number 59252 VILLAGE CHEVROLET 59252 2S-Jun-99 Totals Check Number VILLAGE CHEVROLFT 59252 VILLAGE CHEVROLET 31.26 31.26 HOSE ASSEMBLY Check Number 59253 W.W. GRAINGER INC. 59253 59253 59253 59253 59253 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 Totals Check Number W.W. GRAINGER INC. W.W. GRAINGER INC. W.W. GRAINGER INC. W.W. GRAINGER INC. W.W. GRAINGER INC. 59253 W.W. GRAINGER INC. 118.04 54.32 11.05 25.11 46.48 255.00 BUBBLER-NVR WTR PLNT CUTOFF WHEEL EXHAUST FAN MOTOR COMPRESSOR OIL AIR FLTR, COMPRESSOR OIL Check Number 59254 WARNING LITES OP MN 59254 59254 24-Jun-99 24-Jun-99 Totals Check Number WARNING LITES OF MN WARNING LITES OF MN 59254 WARNING LITES OF 108.95 82.93 191.88 BARRICADES RD UNDER WTR SIGNS Check Number 59255 WIDMER INC 59255 25-Jun-99 Totals Check Number WIDMER INC 59255 WIDMER INC 1,028.00 1,028.00 RPR SWR HOOKUP 2540 CASCO Check Number 59256 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE 59256 24-Jun-99 Totals Check Number WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE 59256 WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE 1,300.00 1,300.00 PARK MOWING Check Number 59257 WOLF, LANETTE 59257 25-Jun-99 WOLF, LANETTE 200.00 COUNCIL MINUTES 6/14 25 Jun 1999 Fri 3:06 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59257 WOLF, LANETTE Totals Check Number ‘59257 WOLF, LANETTE Check Number 59258 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 59258 59258 25-JUX1-99 25-Jun-99 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Totals Check Number 59258 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Check Number 59259 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES Grand Total Transaction Amount 200.00 19.74 9.00 28.74 151,432.73 Page 13 Comments ELECTRICAL SERVICE ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59259 25-Jun-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 552.50 3RD QUARTER COMMERCIAL 59259 25-Jun-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 907.50 3RD QUARTER COMMERCIAL 59259 25-Jun-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 80.00 3RD QUARTER COMMERCIAL 59259 25-Jun-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 182.50 3RD QUARTER COMMERCIAL 59259 25-Jun-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 77.50 3RD QUARTER COMMERCIAL Totals Check Humber 59259 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 1,800.00 Summary of Council Work Session/Townhome Tour ** Held on Thursday, June 24,1999 JUN 2 6 )999 Cl I r ur Onuivu The City Council toured townhouse developments in Plymouth, Minnetonka, Shorewood and Tonka Bay on Thursday, June 24, 1999. The tour included a wide range of costs, designs and densities. A summary of the discussion during the tour is as follows: 1.It is important the quality of building materials and the quality of construction are high to enable the development to continue to be an asset over the long-term 2.A combination of face-brick and other quality exterior materials is desirable for the long-term viability and appearance of a townhouse development. 3.After seeing an older development with mature landscaping vs. new development with minimum landscaping, the Council agreed the City needs to incorporate strong landscaping requirements into its medium-density zoning regulations. 4. The Council liked the nanower streets serving the townhouse developments. 5.The Council did not like the rowhouse-type design with a continuous line of garage doors being the most prominent feature, and rear of the buildings looking like an apartment building. It was suggested that designs with side loading garages would be preferable. It was also suggested that if the City limited buildings to two units there would be much more flexibility in terms of building design and layout. The Council agreed it is important that the medium-density zoning district include detailed performance standards such as the following: 1.Height restrictions or design standards that provide for flatter vs. steeper roof lines for a lower building profile. 2. Winding roads vs. straight roads. 3.Narrower streets. 4. Side loading garages. It was suggested that the City may want to contract with a planner/designer to develop a townhouse layout that reflects the elements the Council has identified as important to enabling a townhouse development to be a long-term asset to the City. GlTYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parimay Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Mr. Tom O’Keefe Mn/DOT Metro Waters Edge Pre-Design 3 South 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 COUMcu meeting JUN 2 8 1999 Cl I Y \jf Dear Tom; As I indicated to you after the June 10 meeting in Medina, the Orono City Council has reconsidered its position regarding retaining walls versus slopes and berms along the south side of the Highway 12 corridor, particularly between Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow Drive. The City has supported the retaining wall option based on limiting the width of the right-of-way as much as possible. Recent discussion of this issue, within the context of right-of-way acquisition and hardship acquisition, has resulted in support for the slope and berm option on the Clint Miller property and the former Trautman property. The City also requests that Mn/DOT analyze the slope and berm option versus retaining wrfl for other locations where there is sufficient space for a slope and berm without taking existing homes or where the property owner would prefer a total take. One area about which there has been little discussion regarding noise mitigation is the area west of Old Crystal Bay Road, particularly where the railroad and highway are at or near grade. This area is mostly undeveloped at this time. However, the City is currently reviewmg a subdivision application for the property west of Stubbs Bay Road. Due to the rural character of this area, it would be prefer-ible to accomplish noise mitigation using berms rather than noise walls. The opportunity to obtwn the right-of-way necessary to accomplish this is available now due to the lack of development in this area. The City requests that Mn/DOT consider berming for noise mitigation on both the north and south sides of the corridor in this area, and that Mn/DOT determine the extent of right-of-way needed to accommodate the berms. If you have any questions, please call me. Thanks for your help. / Ronald J. l^oose City Administrator RJM/ch Telephone (612) 249-4600 • Fax (612) 249-4616 Edmund W. F. Rydell 135 Orono Orchard Road N. Minneapolis, MN 55356 (612) 473 0218 June 18, 1999 COUfyjniL MEETING JUN 2 6 1999 Sandra Smith, Vice Chair, Orono Planning Commission 30 Orono Orchard Road North Wayzala, MN 55391 I T Ur UfiUiVu Dear Sandra, I live across from the old sewer property on Orono Orchard Road. I am veiy distressed over what is happening there lately. They are building a huge, ugly berm right up to the edge of the street which is an repulsive eyesore. It is far worse to look at than any of the other offenses which go on at this property, and is bound to have a detrimental effect on our neighborhood and the value of the nearby properties. Onono and Long Lake have long been making an illegal use of this property. This land is zoned residential, and has been plotted into lots. At that time the neighbors were appraised of the proposed lot sizes, and we agreed to accept the lot sizes which were finally proposed. Since then we have received no notification of or chance to react to the illegal uses, which have included the storage of great piles of dirt, road building materials, brush piles, and vast piles of chipped wood. The noise, smell and dirt of the chippers, trucks and traffic have been an irritant which we should not have to put up with. If any of us tried to conduct any of these activities on our residential properties, you would put us out of business very quickly. Yet the cities seem to consider them selves immune to the same laws which govern the rest of us. The truth is, the cities have no right to conduct these kinds of operations on residential land. The berm which they are constructing bears no resemblance to a landscaping berm. It is a straight, flat, monolithic slab. Landscaping berms are not as high as this, and are sculptured and undulating to relieve the monotony so that when they are attractively planted with evergreens and plants, they are not an eyesore. All we can see from our property of that formerly pleasant meadow is this ugly bank, looming up higher than a one-story building. It is an afiront. It should not be difficult to rent or buy space in some remote comer of Orono to conduct these kinds of operations. It certainly should not be done in a residential area, among some of the nicer homes in the city The berms should be removed, the dumping, storing, and brush chipping operations should be terminated, and the land restored to its pastoral quality so that it can be sold into lots as originally approved. An immediate hold should be placed upon any further work until the matter can be properly deliberated. Respectfully, f •' I I I I.'Vyy vJn' r crCv:o;.v•wV,QProjea Update ^ ™ .iUN O ^ ^PETINQ JUN p 6 1999 Project Overview Femdale Road is being reconstructed to a two lane roadway with concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer improvements and an 8*foot wide bituminous trail on the east side of Femdale Road from the Luce Line Trail to County Road 6. A concrete sidewalk is also being constructed within the City of Wayzata from the Highway 12 bridge to the Luce Line Trail. Constmction is scheduled to be completed by September 15, 1999. The road contractor for the Femdale Road project is S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc. of Jordan, MN. What Has Been Done 12 bridge. This work consists of removing the existing roadway materials down to approximately 2-feet below the new surface of the proposed roadway. The excavated material will be tmcked off-site and traffic delays can be expected. As the contractor continues noiiherly, sand will be placed in the roadbed and capped with a rock surface. This operation will continue up to County Road 6. Roadway excavation is expected to take four to five weeks to complete. The next step will be to place new concrete curb and gutter, retaining walls, a 3- inch bituminous surface between the concrete curb and gutter and paving of the trail. Finally, the boulevard areas will be restored with seed and sod followed by the final layer of blacktop on the roadway. Since the May 18 letter mailed to residents in the Femdale Road project area, the contractor has completed all of the storm sewer pipe work and installed sanitary sewer north of n*** Avenue to serve the St. Edwards Episcopal Church within the City of Orono. Watermain connections also have been completed to ser/c St. Edwards Episcopal Church and the Femdale Place development north of 12'*' Avenue. Minnegasco also has installed some new gas main. U.S. West has been Installing some new telephone lines which needed to be relocated because of the new storm sewer. Caution Please do not drive through the areas still under construction if at all possible. For residents in the Femdale North area, please use Brockton Lane to get to either County Road 6 or Wayzata Boulevard. If it is necessary to drive through an area where work is in progress, please use extreme caution and watch for workers and engineering personnel. Also, please explain to your children that for their own safety they should keep away from the construction area and the large, heavy equipment. What Needs To Be Done Project Hotline Tentatively beginning Tuesday, June 15, the contractor will be starting roadway excavations at the south end of Femdale Road near the Highway The City of Plymouth has initiated a telephone hotline for people who want daily updates. For a llOJCCnT\40CAC«MdlH>»^^>^ J r-' recorded message giving the most up-to-date access information as provided by City’s Field Inspector, call 509-5514. The hotline will tell you where the road may be closed and what is the best access route to and from neighborhoods adjacent to Femdale Road. Questions If you have any questions, please call: • ^y^uth Si^u^^eetog^chnin /Dan O^mpbeU atNg/5522 \/ lan. Tom Kellogg, Project Engineer with Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Assoc., Inc. at (651) 636- 4600 Ga|ppa c)-( Pai\\c S^<'\J\Us 2.4^ -4611 • Leo Pawelsky, Projea Inspector with Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc, at (651) 6044804 Thank You Road construction is a headache for everyone traveling in the area, but it is particularly frustrating for those who Uye in the project area. The City of Plymouth thanks you for your, patience and cooperation. W'VWWI Uf4itjMt.IO.9MM MEETING JUN 2 6 1999 I r OHU/vg MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON MAY 24, 1999 The regular meeting of the Board of Education of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, May 24, 1999. Present; Jack Veach Peg Swanson Dick Lewis Martha Van de Ven Dave McKown Thomas Mich Neal Lawson Board Chair John Maresh arrived while the meeting was in progress; therefore Board Vice Chair Jack Veach opened the meeting. UPON MOTION by Martha Van de Ven, seconded by Dick Lewis the consent agenda was approved as follows: approved the minutes of the May 10, 1999 regular meeting; accepted the resignation of Delores Nelson, Orono High School teacher, effective at the end of the 1998-99 school year; agreed to the request and agreement related to the continuation of the probationary period for four(4)consecutive years with respect to a given teacher and authorized the Chair and the Clerk of the Board to sign said agreement; approved the adoption of the following proposed science texts for grades 5 and 6: Publisher: Sunburst Communications The Voyage of the Mimi Student Book Publisher: Prentice Hall From Bacteria To Plants Cells and Heredity Inside Earth Earth's Water Weather and Climate Human Biology and Health Chemical Building Blocks Chemical Interactions approved football $75; Electricity & Magnetism Motion, Forces & Energy the high school athletic fees for hockey and at $95 and all other athletic activities at approved the following lunch prices for the 1999-2000 school year; Elementary (1-4) Middle School (5-8) High School (9-12) Adults: called for bids for "New" Single $1.65 Single $1.75 Single $1.90 Single $2.55; middle school steel; called for bids for student deslcs; contributed $550.00 to the Orono Education Association to offset costs of the recognition/retirement breaJcfast held at the end of the school year; approved an extended field trip as per the attached information: ON FILE IN DISTRICT OFFICE called for bids for high school auditorium roof repair - approved the bills as covered by vouchers 109849 through 110059. Motion carried. Board member Maresh absent. Dr. Mich stated that the groundbreaking for the new middle school will be held on Wednesday, May 26, and he provided information on the process that will be followed that day; that he wanted to congratulate Dr. Mary Endorf, Orono Primary School Principal, on being named Elementary School Principal of the Year for Minnesota; that he wanted to congratulate the 10th grade students for their good work on the basic skills writing test which was above the State average; that on May 17 the Orono High School Annual Awards Night was held and he distributed a list of the students who were awarded scholarships; that on May 27 the Orono Education Fund will hold a reception for the 1998-99 scholarship recipients; that he wanted to thank the following people whose terms of office are expiring on the Curriculum Council: Michele Kunz, Phyllis Charlton, Dr. Kevin Meyer, Mary Nicoll, Susan Major, Glenn Jeffrey, student representative Andy Brantingham, and District representative Kathy Pommerening; that Heidi Foley, Ernie Stachowski and he would be teaching a summer curriculum course June 22 - 25; that there are over 1,600 registrations for summer school; that graduation will be held on June 8; that June 10 is the last day of school; that June 11 is the Retirement/Recognition Brunch at the Lafayette Club; that the Administrative Cabinet will be meeting with Phil LeBeau from North Central Accreditation regarding the District's accreditation process and information will be brought back to the Board; that the Orono School District is one of 64 Minnesota school districts who received SchoolMatch's annual "What Parents Want" award and a letter of congratulations was received from Christine Jax, Commissioner of Education; that an incident had taken place with regard to "older" bleachers and he described the process that is being followed to remedy this situation; that this evening Attorney Tom Crosby, Fagre Benson, will be representing the District at the Orono City Council meeting to petition for the removal of the road easement that was required when the land was purchased given the District use of the land; that the Facilities Committee met last week regarding use of/development of playing fields, sketches will be drawn up and reviewed by the Facilities Committee and the Board will be updated at that time. At this time Dr. Mich called on Dolores Peterson, Orono Middle School Secretary who spoke on behalf of all of the employees of the School District in honoring the members of the Board of Education. Ms. Peterson expressed appreciation to the Board for the many hours of unpaid work that they do for our schools, for their involvement in our communities. She stated that the staff is greatly appreciative of their visibility as well as their approachability. At this time Dawn Mooney, Schumann Elementary Paraprofessional, and Ron Nelson, Orono Primary School Teacher, presented each Board member with a plaque which stated: "A hundred years from now it will not matter what my bank account was, the sort of house I live in, or the kind of car I drove...but the world may be different because I was important in the life of a child." Many staff members, family members, and community members were present to show appreciation to the Board for their dedication/service to our School District. The meeting was recessed following the presentation and a reception was held for the Board members. Vice chair Jack Veach reconvened the Board meeting following the reception. Dr. Mich updated the Board regarding the 1999 legislative session and brought to the Board's attention, the Association of Metropolitan School Districts Preliminary Summary of the K-12 Omnibus Education Bill which they had received in their packets. Discussion ensued and consensus was that, although interpretation of the bill is still in process, they are pleased with the outcome of the legislative session. Martha Van de Ven stated that she would like thank you letters sent to those who were leaders for education including the Governor. Dr. Mich will consult with AMSD regarding this and provide information at the next Board meeting. UPON MOTION by Martha Van de Ven, seconded by Dave McKown, the Board of Education approved the 1998-99 Final Budget in the amount of $22,097,800 and the 1999-2000 Preliminary Budget in the amount of $38,408,101. Discussion ensued with Board members inquiring as to the distribution of the increase in funding resulting from the K-12 Omnibus Education Bill. Dr. Mich explained that while projections are still taking place and the fact remains that in the past there hasn't been adequate funding, this will probably allow for "catchup" towards making the budget whole. Dr. Mich responded to other questions for clarification purposes. Motion carried. Board member Maresh absent. UPON MOTION by Dave McKown, seconded by Martha Van de Ven, the Board of Education adopted the 1999-2000 year school calendar as follows: • •1999 - 2000 ORONO SCHOOL CALENDAR AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 2 3 4 5 6 D 2 3 1 9 10 11 12 13 □7 8 9 10 4 5 6 7 8 16 17 18 19 20 13 14 15 16 17 U 12 13 14 15 23 24 25 26*27*20 21 22 !23 24 18 19 20 n □27 28 29 30 □26 27 28 29 JANUARY 24 31 11 18 25 5 12 19 26 6 13 20 27 7 14 21 28 FEBRUARY 7 14 1 8 15 22 29 2 9 16 23 3 10 17 24 4 11 18 25 MARCH 12 3 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 27 28 29 30 31 JUNE 1 2 5 6 7 8 9a13141516 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 Professional Day No School School not in acHion New Teachers only Opening and closing of student attendance date..................ACTIVITY August 26, 27.................New Staff Workshop* Aug. 30 - Sept. 1...........All Teachers Workshop September 2 .......................First Day of School September 6..............................................Labor Day October 21, 22 ...................................MFT/MEA October 26 ............................Professional Day November 25, 26..............Thanksgiving Break December 23- January 4.............Winter Break January 17..Semester Break/Professional Day February 21 ......................................Presidents Day March 20 - 24 ...............................Spring Break April 21 ..................................Good Friday April 24 ...........................................Professional Day May 29 ................................................Memorial Day June 9 ..................................Last Day of School June 12 ...........................................Professional Day By way of explanation, Dr. Mich stated that the calendar approved earlier by the Board was contingent upon legislative action rescinding the additional three instructional days to the school calendar. As this did not happen, the tentatively adopted calendar must be altered to add two additional instructional days which provides for 184 faculty days as required by the Master Agreement and for 177 student instructional days. Peg Swanson stated that having to change the calendar is unfortunate because the loss is in staff development days which are so necessary for staff. She stated that she regrets that she cannot support this calendar because of the reduction in staff development days and that she sees this as more a legislative issue that the District literally can do nothing about and she feels compelled to cast a negative vote. The Board expressed frustration regarding the development of school calendars and legislative requirements. The question was called. Lewis, Van de Ven, Veach and McKown voted in favor. Swanson voted against. Maresh absent. Motion carried. Neal Lawson provided information to the Board on the bids for site work at the new middle school and at the high school. He stated that the bids, with the exclusion of the fencing, are below the budget estimates and he reviewed the bids/rejections. He then called on Gary Benson and Rich Jacobson, Kraus-Anderson Construction Company - Midwest Division who answered questions from the Board for clarification purposes. UPON MOTION by Dave McKown, seconded by Peg Swanson, the Board of Education awarded Orono Middle School and High School Site Development to the following: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Gradiny/Earthwork to F.M. Frattalone in the amount of $439,400; Site utilities to Veit & Company in the amount of $241,418; Concrete curbs/walks to Crosstown Masonry Co. in the amount of $178,000; Asphalt Paving to EWJ Corporation in the amount of $289,824; Fencing/backstops - reject all bids; Landscaping/irrigation to Arteka corporation in the amount of $129,785 base bid and $27,387 Alternate No. 1; as the lowest possible bidders. Maresh absent. Motion carried. Board member r Mr. Neal Lawson provided background information on the health and safety management plan and in doing so expressed appreciation to Bruce Frahm who started the process and presented information to the Board in February, 1996. Mr. Lawson introduced John Ostlund, Supervisor of Building and Grounds, who is now continuing the work in this area. Mr. Ostlund provided an overview of the process/procedures informing the Board that the document they have received will continue to change and grow in order to remain in compliance with health and safety regulations/standards. Mr. Ostlund answered questions from the Board for clarification purposes. UPON MOTION by Dick Lewis, seconded by Dave McKown, the Board of Education endorsed the Health and Safety Management Plan as the procedures for the required compliance with all applicable regulations and building operational standards. Motion carried. Dr. Mich requested that the Board set July 1, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. for the annual reorganization meeting. He informed the Board that because Board elections will now take place in November, the reorganizational meeting would then be scheduled for January, 2000. He recommended that the Board consider extension of terms of office, etc. to January, 2000. The consensus of the Board was to establish a date/time but that the meeting would be canceled if there could be a continuation of business/offices until January, 2000. UPON MOTION by Jack Veach, seconded by Dave McKown, the Board of Education set July 1, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. for the annual reorganization meeting. Motion carried. At 9:20 p.m. Dick Lewis MOVED, Dave McKown SECONDED, that the Board meeting be closed and that the Board adjourn into Executive Session to discuss educational data of a private nature. Motion carried. UPON MOTION by Jack Veach, seconded by Dick Lewis the Board meeting reconvened at 10:10 p.m. Motion carried. UPON MOTION by Dave McKown, seconded by Peg Swanson, the Board of Education adopted the resolution agreed upon in Executive Session regarding a matter that dealt with private educational data. Motion carried. UPON MOTION by Martha Van de Ven, seconded by Peg Swanson, the meeting was adjourned. Motion carried. CITY OF EXCELSIOR r June 23, 1999 ■'i/:'! 2 5 I9J5 CiT(' C.- V,., 339 THIRD STREET EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 65331 TELE: 612-474-5233 To Public Officials, News Media Organizations, Neighboring Cities: On June 21, 1999, the Excelsior City Council unanimously adopted a resolution which states principles that should be used when considering public financial support for sports stadiums that would be constructed primarily for the use by professional sports. As stated in the resolution, the Exc'*lsior Council: Calls for taxpayers to be consulted, preferably through a referendum, before levying any kind of local tax as a general obligation to which they would be subject, including a one-half percent sales tax. Opposes taxing Hennepin County taxpayers to support, in any way, professional sports without a referendum to support such expenditures. Opposes otherwise any public spending for private ventures in professional sports. The City Council also encourages the city councils of all other cities in Hennepin County to join Excelsior in adopting these principles. A copy of this resolution has been enclosed. If you have questions or would like further Information, please contact me at 612.474,5233. Sincerely, Crat*;; V/.^lawson Cit> Mi^ger City of Excelsior Hennepin County RESOLUTION NO. 99-21 A RESOLUTION OPPOSING TAXATION WITHOUT PUBLIC CONSENT FOR A NEW BASEBALL STADIUM IN HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, The Minnesota Legislature has rejected tax support for, and/or government ownership or participation in professional, major league baseball; and WHEREAS, Residents of the City of Minneapolis approved a city charter amendment which would limited property-tax supported expenditures for single capital projects to $10 million; and WHEREAS, The mayor of the City of Saint Paul has proposed a referendum in that city to determine the public’s willingness to support public funding for a professional baseball stadium; and WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Excelsior believes that taxpayers should be consulted, preferably through a referendum, before levying any kind of local (i.e., county-wide) tax as a general obligation to which they would be subject, including a one-half percent sales tax, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Excelsior that: • It opposes taxing Hennepin County taxpayers to support, in any way, professional sports without a referendum to support such expenditures. • It opposes otherwise any public spending for private ventures in professional sports. • It encourages city councils of all other cities in Hennepin County to join with Excelsior in adopting this statement of principles. ATTEST: Adopted by the City Council ?n June 21,1999 Jam« R. Olds, City Clerk/Treasurer Jti. ^2jL^ Jonn E. Anderson, Mayor awrson. City Manager CITY OF EXCELSIOR 339 THIRD STREET EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 TELE: 612-474-5233 June 23, 1999 TO:Whom It May Concern FROM: Charlie Thomson, Excelsior City Council Member Thank you for reading the resolution regarding stadium financing that was adopted by the Excelsior City Council on June 21,1999. There was one additional point that I would have added to the resolution, and it was agreed to by all but one of the councilmembers. It was not included m the resolution, however, as we sought unanimity. This point was as follows: "The Excelsior City Council suggests that professional sports get their fiscal houses in order, including the establishment of such measures as revenue sharing, within their leagues." fhis idea has been suggested by the Governor and the Mayor of Minneapolis; and Joe Soucheray and Pat Reusse, of KSTP-AM fame. They all seem to agree that a new stadium won’t forestall money problems for the Twins. iI