Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-14-1999 Council PacketCOiiMnii meeting JUN 1 4 1999 C»TY Oh UmONO AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 14,1999,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CALL 1.7:00 P.M. - ASSESSMENT HEARING - EDGEWOOD HILLS SEWER PROJECT A.Adopt Edgewood Hills Sewer Assessment - Resolution B.Award Contract for Edgewood Hills Sewer - Resolution ^2. MAPLE PLAIN FIRE DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION - 1998 Report CONSENT AGENDA 3.App rove/Amend APPROVAL OF MINTITES *4. Regular Council Meeting of May 24,1999 /PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Susan Wilson, Representative (/Planning commission comments (/public comments - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT o.Kurt Schmid, 160 Golden yiew Road - Appeal of Admninstrative Decision *6. #1321 Orono Schools, 800 Old '^r^''rtal Bay Road North - Extinguish City Easement - Resolution ^7.#2169 Michael Renard, 1185 Toakawa Road - Variance - Resolution V-S. #2447 Kirt Woodhouse, 885 Femdale Road West - Variance /9.#2480 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Final Plat Approval - Resolution /lO. #2484 Woodhill Country Club, 200 Woodhill Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 11.Extend Adult Use Moratorium - Ordinance f 12. Extend Service 800 Access Agreement Deadlines - Access Discussion /mAYOR/COUNCBL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT \/\1. Schedule Public Hearing for Fox Ridge Sanitar>' Sewer Project A.Order Preparation of Report for Fox Ridge Sewer - Resolution B.Receive Report and Schedule Hearing for Fox Ridge Sewer - Resolution 14.Approve Purchase of Lawn Mowers for Golf Course 15.Approve Purchase ofPublic Works Truck X 16. Request for Payment #3 - Lift Station #13 Rehabilitation ^17. Request for Payment #8 - Navarre Water Treatment Rehabilitation M F. Approve Purchase of Fuel System AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 14,199? 7*00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT f^l9. Tax Forfeit Parcel, 1025 Brown Road South - Resolution 20. Subregional Housing Euoib ■ . • . 21. Fee Schedule Amendment - Ordinance 22. Resignation oi L.aroi fiansmg, t'art-iime Clerical - Police Department 23. Resignation of Steve Weckman, Or-Site Systems Manager - Resolution 24. Appointment of Don Palmeteer to Temporary Building Inspector Position 2 5. Appointment of Kristine Jensen to Assistant Zoning Administrator Position 26. Appointment of Adrienne Madson to Part-Time Police Records Clerk Position 27. Appointment of Wendy Bottenberg to Zoning Intern Position 28. .Promotion of Paul Weinberger to Zoning Administrator/Planner III Position ' Ordinance Amendment to Enable Assessment of Costs to Remedy Health and Safety Issues on _____J*roperty - Ordinance d_35^DNR Interest in Tax Forfeit Parcel Adjacent to Wood-Rill SNA j^r Sl. ^^mendment to Compensation Policy ^2. Request for Replacement of Microfiche Reader/Printer CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ♦ 33. LICENSES * 34. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND E^^ENTS im 06/10 - Council Work Session, 7:30 a.m. 06/14 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 06/17 - Council Work Session, 7:30 a.m. 06/21 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 06/28 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 07/05 - HOLIDAY - July 4 Observance 07/06 - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 07/07 - Highway 12 Design Review Committee Meeting, 5:30 p.m. 07/12 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 07/19 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 07/26 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. Public A ttendance Meeting Date COUNCIL Planning Commission Park Commission Other ||.BEQUESriTO NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER C0(/Mnii mpeting TO:Mayor and City Council iki/7 / JUN 1 4 1999 Cl 1 Y UHUNO FROM:Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE: ( May?, 1999 SUBJECT:City of Medina Request for Orono Input Regarding Development in the Medina Momingside Area Additional Sewered A number of years ago, the Cities of Orono and Long Lake allowed the City of Medina to connect to their joint sewer trunk line through a connection along Old Crystal Bay Road to solve a substantial problem with failing septic systems in the Medina Momingside area. This area is on Orono's northern border west of Willow Drive. There are approximately 15 acres of undeveloped property remaining in the Medina Momingside area tliat cannot be developed without sanitary sewer service. As part of its Comprehensive Plan update, the City of Medina is reviewing options for the development of this property. One option being considered is the subdivision of the property into 15 lots of approximately 3/4 acre to one acre each, to be served by sewer. The City of Medina is asking for Orono's input regarding this option. A letter and map from the City of Medina is attached. The property is located between an area of small lots (less than 1/2 acre) served by sewer to the north, and an area of 2+ acre lots on septic to the south in Orono, The proposed zoning is for sewered lots with a minimum area of 30,000 square feet, or 3/4 acre. It makes sense that the density of development on this property is somewhere between the existing densities to the north and south to enable a transition zone between the urban density to the north and rural density to the south. Although the 3/4 acre lots fall between the densities to the north and south, they are much closer to the urban density than to the rural density. If the lots are to be 3/4 acre, Orono may want to request a buffer strip along tlie south boundary of the property to somewhat mitigate the higher density. .# CITY OF MmiM 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN 55340 . tt >' -•! U nS99 June 4, 1999 Ron Morse City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Ron: At a joint work session between Medina's City Council and Planning Commission they discussed Medina's Comprehensive Plan. At that meeting they requested that I ask the City of Orono about an issue concerning a request for additional sewer units. A couple weeks ago we spoke about this portion of Medina's Comprehensive Plan that proposes providing sewer to the property south of the area known as Medina Morningside. Currently, the City has an agreement with the cities of Long Lake and Orono for 82 sewer units to serve this area. Medina is currently using 80 of those units. The pr<"certy owner to the south of Medina Morningside, where the sewer lift station is located, would like to develop his property. The city is willing to accommodate this request as long as it can provide for the additional sewer through the City of Orono. Medina is proposing to zone this area as Suburban Residential(as shown on the map provided). This zoning has a minimum lot size requirement of 30,000 sq. ft. This would accommodate no more the 14 units on the Keller Property(and include an additional 3 units in case the three properties to the west of the Keller property need to be bailed out in the future). It is Medina's understanding that when State Highway 12 is reconstructed the Metropolitan Council will probably build an interceptor along It. At that time Medina would like access through Orono to fulfill this request. Medina's Comprehensive Plan Is In the last stages of development. At this time we would like Orono initial impression concerning this request. ncerely, ) [obinson City Clerk-Treasurer cc; Loren Kohnen Administration • Planning and Zoning • Public Works Phone: 473-4643 • Fax: 473-9359 Public Safety Phone: 473-9209 • Fax: 473-6939 o O 0 (D 3 -JO a 3 f11 ! <X Oi O) I ub cr CQ “•'ll ‘Sii sisll iUliillf I I n oi (om n REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCM MEETING JUN 1 4 1999 Cu t OF OflONO DATE: June 8, 1999 ITEM NO.; / Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer ’s Report Item Description: Assessment Hearing for Edgewood Hills Sewer Project This project has been bid several times for a gravity sewer system in the road and a grinder pump alternate system. The costs for gravity sewer in the street were very high and the grinder pump system was not desirable. A value engineered alternative to install gravity sewer behind the homes is the best system and is acceptable to the residents (see May 10th Council memo). The proposed project assessment is $27,325 per unit for eight units and seven of the eight property owners support the project. We have had discussions with the property owner at 450 Woodhill Road regarding a possible assessment appeal. The property owner ’s objection is that because they will be served by a connection to the existing sewer along Woodhill Road, they should not have to pay the full assessment. The current and historical City policy is that all properties in the project area pay the same assessment with no consideration being given to the location of the property within the project area. This is a fair and equitable policy as all properties are receivii.^ the same benefit of obtaining sanitary sewer .service. The existing septic system on this property was recently tested before sale of the property and is non-coiTorming to the 3’ separation rule. It is also not conforming to wetland setbacks. My understanding is that there have been problems with sewer backups. There are not any replacement sites available that would conform to current standards. Based on the above factors, the value of sewer to this property is very high as septic system options are basically non ­ existent. The proposed interest rate in the attached resolution is 8%. This rate can be adjusted downward after the interest rate on the pending bond sale is known. Resolutions to revise the interest rate on this year’s assessments can be approved this fall. The residents are interested in completing this project as soon as possible, so they can complete home remodeling and landscaping projects yet this summer. We are recommending award of the contract at this meeting. The contractor is available to start work as soon as all the required documents are signed and approved. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of resolution adopting the Edgewood Hills area sanitary sewer assessment roll. Approval of resolution awarding the contract for the installation of sanitary sewer in the Edgewood Hills area. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 10, 1999 ITEM NO.: Deportment Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer’s Report Item Description: Schedule Assessment Hearing for Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Project The third bid opening for this project was recently held and only one bid was received, ihe iirst two times the project was bid were for a directionally boied gravity flow sewer system. These bids were higher than expected and were both rejected. This third bid included both a gravity flow system and grinder pump system option. The gravity system bid was very nigh, and the cost savings from a grinder pump system were not great enough for the residents to justify having an individual grinder pump to maintain. The bid for a gravity flow system was $252,962.00, and the bid for the grinder pump system was $161,987.80. The residents would like to have a gravity flow sewer system. The contractor suggested that if the sewer could be installed’ in the yards behind the houses the project could be completed at a lower cost. An option to install the sewer in the back yards was considered in the original feasibility study, but was rejected because of concerns about tree loss. The residents said that they are now interested in having the sewer installed in the back yard and will accept the loss of some trees. A site meeting was held with the contractor and most of the residents. A revised pipe alignment through the back yards was laid out and is acceptable to the residents. This revised alignment, located directly behind the houses, will be a combination of open cut installation and directional boring and will be shorter than the original feasibility study alignment. The contractor, GL Construction of Medina, is the same contractor that constmeted the Heritage/Shoreline project last year. This is a very good contractor and was excellent in working with the neighborhood residents. We are very satisfied with the quality of their work. GL Construction was also the only bidder the last two times that Edgewood Hills was bid. The contract specifications reference a MNDOT provision for "value engineering" for this project. This concept allows the contractor to propose alternate methods for project construction that are more cost effective. The revised sewer alignment developed by the contractor and neighborhood residents is a better and more cost-effective solution for this project. Also, the residents are comfortable with the contractor and are supportive of the revised alignment. We have obtained a value engineering proposal from GL Construction for the revised alignment. We have compared this proposal to other bid prices we have received and believe the proposal is a fair and reasonable price for the project. The construction cost for the revised gravity flow system was $158,620. This project has also been discussed with the City Attorney and is acceptable to him. We are recommending that, after the assessment hearing is held, that the contract for this project be awarded to GL Construction with a value engineering change order to construct the revised sewer alignment through the back yards. • • We are recommending approval of the attached resolutions to schedule the assessment hearing for the regularity scheduled Council meeting on June 14th for this project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve resolution declaring cost to be assessed and ordering preparation of proposed assessment for Edgewood Hills Area Sanitary sewer Motion to approve resolution scheduling hearing for June 14, 1999 on proposed assessment for Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer. ' r». # •• • • V/OODHILL \ * COUNTRY iI CLUB «•#! wo SLhLl ^ UAcJI KJ. \ t . A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE EDGEWOOD HILLS AREA SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of sanitary sewer in the Edgewood Hills area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City CouncU of Orono, Minnesota; 1. 2. 3. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such assessment shall be payable m equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2000 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1999. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days fi’om the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. Partial prepayment may be allowed in accordance with ordinances which are existing or which the City may choose to adopt in the future. Page 1 of 2 4.The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council of Orono this 14th day of June, 1999. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 2 of 2 4 < i li I r 1 Assessment Roll for Eilgcwood Hills 0$.Mt^99 Municipal Code: 38 / Municipality: ORONO Project Number: 99-2 Edgewood Hill Levy Numben Total Project Assessment: $218,600.00 Levy Description: Interest Rate: 8%Number of Years Payable: IS PID«t Addition Total Code Principal Lot Block Name Street Properly Address n Mailing Street Address Mailing City Address 02-117-23 13 0003 43137 27,325.00 VARTKESEHIIAMJIAN 1050 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD 1050 EDGEWOOD HILL ROAD WAYZATAMN 55391 02-117-23 13 0005 01373 27,325.00 2 1 GJPAULUCCI 320 WOODHILL ROAD 320 WOODHILL RD WAYZATA MN 55391 02-117-23 14 0001 43137 27,325.00 THOMAS CUSICK 965 EDGEWOOD HIL1.S ROAD 965 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 02-117-23 41 0002 43137 27,325.00 02-117-23 41 0003 43137 27,325.00 FREDA KEITH 02-117-23 42 0002 43137 27,325.00 DE&KK JACKSON 111 1055 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD 02-117-23 42 0003 43137 27,325.00 CECILIA ROSENBERG 450 WOODHILL ROAD 450 WOODHILL ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 02-117-23 42 0004 43137 27,325.00 ANNE LARSEN SIMONSON 1065 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD 1065 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 I • Units 1 1055 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD .• 1 WAYZATA MN 55391 218,600.00 A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN THE EDGEWOOD HILLS AREA WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the installation of sanitary sewer improvements in the Orono Orchards improvement area, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law; and WHEREAS, it appears that G. L. Contracting, Medina, Minnesota is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 1.The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a construction contract with G. L. Contracting, Medina, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Orono for the installation of sanitary sewer improvements in the Edgewood Hills area according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk in the amount of $158,620 including change order number one. 2.The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Orono City Council at a regular Council meeting held on June 14, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 1 of 1 mm Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderlik and Assoc axes. Inc. Is an Affirmative Action/Squa! Opportunity Employer Principals Otto G. Bon<:icroo. PE. ^ Joseph C. Anderlik. PE. • Marvin L. Sorvata. PE • Cler.n R. Cook. PE • Robci: G, Scf jnicht. PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. • Robert W. Rosene. PE.. Richard E Turner. PE. and Susan M. Eberlin. C.PA.. Senior Consultants Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PE. • Keith A. Gordon. PE. • Robert R. Pfcfferie. PE. • Richard W. Foster. PE. • David O. Loskota. PE. • Robert C. Russek. A.I.A. • Mark A. Hanson. PE. • Michael T. Rautmann. PE. • Ted K.Fiefd. PE. • Kenneth P. Anderson. PE • Mark R. Rolfs. PE. • Sidney P Williamsoa PE-. LS. • Robert F. Kotsmith • Agnes M. Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt PH. Offices Sr Paul. Rochester. Wilimar and St. Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. wi Engineers & Architects Website: wwwbonestroo.com May?. 1999 Honorable City Council City of Orono 2750 KeUy Pkwy PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: City of Orono Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Improvements BRA File No. 139-98-099 Honorable City Council: Bids were opened for the project stated above on March 24,1999. Transmitted herewith is a copy of the bid tabulation for your information and file. A copy will also be dishibuted to the bidder. There was a total of 1 bid. The following summarizes the results of the 1 bid received. Contractor Low G L Contracting, Inc. Baxe Bid Amount Alternate Bid Amount $252,962.00 $161,987.80 The low bidder on the project was G L Contracting, Inc. with a base bid amount of $252,962.00. The base bid included work to install a ^avity sewer system in front of the homes in Edgewood Hills Road. The alternate bid was for the installation of a pressure sewer system to serve the neighborhood. The base bid exceeded our engineers estimate of $170,000 by nearly 50%. A meefing with the residents indicated that they were not in favor of a pressure sewer system. The residents want gravity sewer but the base bid resulted in an excessive assessment per unit. As a result, we have worked with the contractor and the residents to come up with a value engineered design to provide gravity sewer to all residents. The resultant design is an alignment located behind the homes away from the roadway. The total construction cost for this value engineered design is $158,620.10, a savings of $94,341.90 from the base bid. The bid has been reviewed and found in order. Therefore, we recommend that the project be awarded to G L Contracting, Inc for the base bid amount of $252,962.00 and that a change order be approved for a total nei deduct of $94,341.90. ^ / b l-Ot \6) Should you have any questions, please feel free to contart me at (651) 604-4863. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Tom Kell6gg Enclosures TPK:jms cliefitbldubltr I. 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651*636-4600 ■ Fax; 651-636-1311 : A. , i 1 All iT 'nestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engln«eritArcWttcu Bid Opening; 3/24/99 11^00Mt Vi*-; \ 'jas^ 1 Project Name: Ed9ewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Project No.;File No. Owner. / hereby certify that this is an exact G/er:r7 R Ccck, P.E, Registration No. 9451 Item Num Item Units 27 28 29 Bid No. 1 G L Contracting Inc Unit Price Alternate Bid (Plan Sheets 1. 2,3A, and 4) Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer Construct manhole over existing sewer Air release MH Force main access manhole Cleanout manhole Total 1 Part 1 • Sanitary Sewer Constnjct manhole over existing EA 1.CC S30.240.70 S30.240.70 2 sewer Std. MH 8 ‘ dp.. 4* dia., w/R1642B EA 3.00 SI,837.40 $5,512.20 3 cstg. h*H depth greater than 8* dee?LF S131.40 S3,310.£j 4 Directional bore 8 “ HOPE SDR 17 LF 790.00 S74.70 559.013.00 5 Directional bore 4** HDPE SDR 11 LF 1300 00 $48 20 562 660 on 6 service pipe 4” PVC cleanout EA 1000 $684.60 56.846.00 7 8" X 4" PVC or HDPE compatible EA 7.00 $482.90 53.330.33 8 v/ye branch Furnish 8 ‘* x 4'* PVC wye, cut int9 EA 2.00 $1,295.80 52.591.60 9 ex. 8 * PVC 4“ PVC service pipe In place, SDR LF 20.00 $16.70 5334.00 10 Insulation SY 20.00 $9.60 SI 92.00 11 Sanitary sewer television inspection LF 790.00 $1.60 $1,264.00 12 Traffic control LS 1.00 $5,296.20 $5,296.20 13 Total Part 1 • Sanitary Sewer Pa»i2-R««to»’atlon Type 41A bituminous wearing course TN 220.00 $44.10 $181,140.60 $9,702.00 14 Bituminous material for tack coat GAL 150.00 $3.30 $495.00 15 Bituminous street patching SY * ••450.00 $30.00 513.500.00 16 Clear and Grub LS 1.00 $5,264.50 55.264.50 17 Bituminous driveway restoration SY 600.00 $21.60 513,080.00 18 Sod with 4** topsoil SY 5000.00 $3.60 $18,000.00 19 Seed >with topsoil, mulch and fertilizer AC 0.50 $2,617.50 20 Erosion control fence LF 500.00 $1.80 $900.00 21 Furnish and plant Evergreen Tree EA 4.00 $484.50 $1,938.00 22 (Blue Spruce) 6 ‘ high Furnish and plant shade tree (Sugar EA 4.00 $127.60 $510.40 23 Maple) 4’* diameter Remove and transplant bushes EA 4.00 $484.50 $1,938.00 24 Remove and transplant tree -EA 4.00 $484.50 $1,938.00 25 Desiduous Remove and transplant tree •EA 4.00 $484.50 $1,938.00 Coniferous Total Part 2 - Restoration Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer Total Part 2 • Restoration Total Base Bid • (Plan Sheets 1. 2,3, and 4) $71,821.40 $181,140.60 $71,821.40 $252,962.00 13999bt EA 1.00 530.240.70 $30,240.70 EA 1.00 52.524.50 52.524.50 EA 1.00 52.799.30 52.799.30 EA 1.00 52.299.40 $2,299.40 BT-1 133-98-099 City of Orono Bid No. 1 G L Contracting Inc Item Num_____________Item ------------------- 30 Trench or directional bore 3" HOPE SDR 11 31 Trench or directional born 2" HOPE SORll 32 Directional bore 1-1/2 ' HOPE, SDR 11 ser/ice pipe 33 Directional bore 4" HDPE SDR 11 service pipe 34 3‘*x1-1/2'* HDPE lee 35 Furnish 8" X 4" PVC wye. cut into ex. 8" PVC 36 2" X 1-1/2" HDPEtee 37 4“ PVC service pipe in place, SDR 26 38 1-1/2 ’' curb stop and box 39 Traffic control Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer Part 2 • Restoration Type 41 A bituminous wearing cours Bituminous material for tack coat GAL Bituminous street patching SY Clear and Grub LS Bituminous driveway restoration SY Sod with 4" topsoil SY Seed with topsoil, mulch and fertilizer AC Erosion contro’. fence LF Furnish and plant Evergreen Tree EA (Blue Spruce) 6' high 49 Furnish and plant shade tree (Sugar EA Maple) 4" diameter 50 Remove and transplant bushes 51 Remove and transplant tree • 52 Remcve and transplant tree - Coniferous Total Part 2 - Restoration Units Qty Unit Price Total LF 680.00 $27.80 $18,904.00 LF 170.00 $23.60 $4,012.00 LF 1000.00 $18.00 $18,000.00 LF 170.00 $46.20 $7,854.00 EA 4.00 $288.60 $1,154.40 EA 2.00 31.258 70 $2,517.40 EA 3.00 $240.00 $720.00 LF 20.00 $15.60 $312.00 EA 7.00 $179.00 $1,253.00 LS 1.00 $4,286.20 $4,286.20 $96,876.90 TN 220.00 $40.50 $8,910.0040 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 EA EA ' * 150.00 450.00 1.00 600.00 5000.00 0.20 1000.00 4.00 4.00 4.001 4.00 S2.80 $27.90 $3,244.50 $19.80 $3.60 $1.60 $454.20 $97.30 $454.20 $454.20 4.00 $454.20 Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer Total Part 2 - Restoration Total Alternate Bid (Plan Sheets 1, 2, 3A, $420.00 $12,555.00 $3,244.50 $11,880.00 $18,000.00 $845.00 $1,600.00 $1,816.80 $389.20 $1,816.80 $1,816.80 $1,816.bU $65,110.90 $96,876.90 $65,110.90 $181,987.80 Contractor Name and Address: G L Contracting Inc 4300 Willow Dr Medina. MN 55340 Phone: (612)478-9529 Fax (612) 478-9592 Signed By:|ciiff Reep Title: I Bid Security:|6id Bond Addenda Acknowledged; One 13999bt BT-2 ,1/ I Bonestroo Rosene mr* AnderlikSi Associates CngU^ter j & Architects Owner City of Orono, 2750 Kelly Pkwy, PO Box 66Crystal Bay, MN, 55323 Date Junes, 1999 Contractor. G L Contracting Inc, 4300 Willow Dr, Medina, MN, 55340 Bond; —-----------’ ‘ -------------------------------------- • -------------------- Bond No: OiANGE ORDER NO. 1 " EDGEWOOD HILLS SANITARY SEWER ‘ bra File No. 139-98-099 •• . Description of Work . ■The sewer alignment was revised based on a value engineered design. The sewer will be located behind the homes and off the street This Change Order represents the revised quantities and costs based on the value engineered design. No.Item Unit Contract Quantity Unit Price Total Amount Change Order No. 1 Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer (Deduct) 1 Construct manhole oyer existing sewer EA -1 $30,240.70 ($30,240.70) 2 4 ’ diameter sanitary MH, 8' deep, including R- 1642-B casting EA -3 $1,837.40 ($5,512.20) 3 MH depth greater than 8* deep LF -29 $131.40 ($3,810.60) 4 Directional bore 8 ‘* HDPE SDR 17 LF -790 $74.70 ($59,013.00) 5 Directional bore 4 ” HDPE SDR 11 service pipe LF -1300 $48.20 ($62,660.00) 6 4 “ PVC cleanout EA -10 $684.60 ($6,846.00) 7 8 ” X 4** PVC or HDPE compatible service w>e branch EA -7 $482.90 ($3,380.30) 8 Furnish 8" x4'“ PVC wye, cut into e.\. 8 “ PVC EA -2 $1,295.80 ($2,591.60) 9 4* PVC, SDR 26 sendee pipe LF -20 $16.70 ($334.00) 10 Insulation SY -20 $9.60 ($192.00)• 11 Sanitary sewer television inspection • LF -790 $1.60 ($1,264.00) 12 Traflic control LS -1 $5,295.20 ($5,296.20) Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer (Deduct)($181,140.60) Part 2 - Restoration peduct) 13 T>i)e 41 A bituminous wearing course TN -220 $44.10 ($9,702.00) 14 Bituminous material for tack coat GAL -150 $3.30 ($495.00) 15 Bituminous street patching SY •450 $30.00 ($13,500.00) 1$Clear and Grub LS -1 $5,264.50 ($5,264.50) GungcOrdcrlJtli •. _ . w ^ .. « ♦*. » . - *'C. :«•••». . .. Contract Unit Total 1.Item Unit Quantity -Price Amount J •Bituminous driveway restoratioa *: •. SY....... . : ;:..-600 .•- S21.80 -($13,080.00) i Sod with 4” topscil .....SY ' -5000 S3.60 ($18,000.00) . Seed with topsoil, mulch and fertilizer AC -0.5 $5,235.00 ($2,617.50) i)Erosipa control fence LF -500 SI.80 ($900.00) 1 Furnish and plant Evergreen Tree (Blue Spruce) 6' high .............EA . . -4 $484.50 ($1,938.00) t 2 Furnish and plant shade tree (Sugar Maple) 4" diameter EA -4 .$127.60 ($510.40) 3*Remove and transplant biishcs EA - --------"-4 -$484.50 •($1,938.00) :4 Remove and transplant tree - Desiduous EA -4 $484.50 ($1,938.00) »5 Remove and transplant tree - Coniferous EA -4 S484.5U ($1,938.00) Total Part 2 - Restoration (Deduct)- ($71,821.40) Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer (Deduct)($181,140.60) Total Part 2 - Restoration (Deduct)($71,821.40) . Total Deduct •• ($252,962.00) • Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer (Addition) 26 8" PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35, C-S’ deep LF 1030 $32.20 $33,166.00 27 Connect 8“ PVC to existing manhole EA 1 $2,496.80 $2,496.80 28 4* diameter sanitary MH, 8’ deep, including R- 1642-B casting EA 7 $1,779.70 $12,457.90 29 Directional bore 8" HOPE SDR 11 LF 60 $74.80 $4,488.00 30 Direcdonal bore 4* HDPE SDR 11 service pipe LF 585 $48.30 $28,255.50 31 4" PVC cleanout EA 7 $281.10 $1,967.70 32 8” X 4“ PVC service wye branch EA 6 M0.50 $243.00 33 Furnish 8* x 4" PVC wye, cut into ex. 8* PVC EA 3 $1,703.30 $5,109.90 34 4* PVC, SDR 26 service pipe LF 550 $19.00 $10,450.00 35 Mechanical trench compaction LF 1580 $0.98 $1,548.40 SY 100 $9.60 $960.00 36 Insulation 37 Sanitary sewer television inspection LF 1030 • $1.60 $1,648.00 Connect 4" PVC to existing home E/i.8 $2,545.30 $20,362.40 38 • Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer (Addition) $123,153.60 CtuJTjcOfdcTlJdi • - • ♦ *' Contract Unit Total No.Item Unit Quantity Price Amount Part 2 • Restoration (Addition) —---------------^------- • •......... 39 Clear and Grub ' “LS .$3,786.00 $3,786.00 • 40 % • . Sod with 4” topsoil SY . , ; 2000 $3.60 $7,200.00 ■51 • Seed with topsoil, mulch and t'ertilizer AC 1.$5,244.50 \:;,::4.5p . ‘ 42 Erosion control fence \y 1050 '51.80 $1,890.00 43 Furnish and plant Evergreen Tree (Blue Spruce) 6'• # high EA 20 $345.90 $6,918.00 ' 44 Furnish and plant shade tree (Sugar Maple) 4*’ • • diameter.................... -.._.EA -----------10 _____$345.90 -.....- $3,459.00----- 45 Remove and transplant bushes • EA • 10 $232.30 $2,323.00 46 Remove and transplant tree - Desiduous EA 10 $232.30 $2,323.00 47 Remove and transplant tree • Coniferous EA 10 $232.30 $2,323.00 • Total Part 2 • Restoration (Addition)•$35,466.50 • Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer (Addition)$123,153.60 • • .Total Part 2 - Restoration (Addition)$35,466.50 • Total Addition • $158,620.10 Total Deduct ($252,962.00) ' r ' f Total Addition $158,620.10 Total Change Order No. 1 • •($94,341.90) ♦ ■ i ClungcOrder 1 ^ Original Contract Amount Previous Change Ordws__^ . This Change Order ------ vt V . /t*- ■ *> ‘O v.«w . * ^ • t • • • ^ ^ ^ «a/ • • *• ' ?vC\ised Contract Amount (including this change order) '*••«• .. .. • . ... $252,962.00 __ $0.00 _v__ _ .: - ($94,341.90) i n- $158,620.10 Recommended for Approval by: ' •• • • ‘ ' * • BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Date: •\.i ‘Vi.• ■ • ty ' , • •« Approved by Owner: CITY OF ORONO t •» . cc: Owner ConUactor Bonding Company Bonestroo 8c Assoc. CtuAgeOrd^tJds REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MiETINQ JUN 1 4 1999 CITY OF UriUNO DATE: June 9,1999 ITEM NO: ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Maple Plain Fire Department Update The Maple Plain Fire Department has provided its 1998 annual report to the City. ^aveKsinge^ the Maple Plain Fire Chief, has requested a brief opportunity to update the Council onHIs Department's activities and to answer any questions the Council may have. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: No action required. t . r*. •; * • , . / . - • .* •A*. • • * •*' • • • Maple Plain Fire Debartnrieht 1998 Report . t • • • I * • - *.v * • • •<•*■ f •* M f.• I ' •J* 1998 year in review t* . * A > 271 total calls in 1998 down from 310 in 1997 ■ 7 structure fires in 1998 compared to 17 in 1997 • Grass fires down 60% from 1997 ■ . 41 car accidents in 1998 compared to 44 in 1997 ■ 115 medical calls down from 124 in 1997 ■ 27 false fire alarms :t09o " ❖Hours of service for 1998 > 6033 total hours of service paid out in 1998 • 2835 hours on calls ‘ ■ 2227,50 hours of training > Pay Roll Budget for 1998 was $9200 > Average pay for 1998 was $1.52 per hour ❖Personnel r- 27 active fire fighters ■ 1 probationary ■ 3 applicants ■ 1 retirement as of 2-21-99 > Projections ■ 7 people qualify for 20 year retirement • 12 people qualify for 10 year retirement • 9 people with less then 10 years of service Training > New recruit training ■ Firefighter training ■ First Aid training ■ State fire school 225 hours or 22 weeks 40 hours (minimum) 16 hours > Yearly training for active Fire Fighter ■ 40 hours required training per year ■ First Aid 10 (minimum) ■ SCBA • Hazardous Materials refresher * ■ V • * ’ • • 1 • * • • • :| • * . ••• ♦ * ,. •• •• • * . • • •• . . • s . •* ‘ .. >. *• AAaple Plain Fife Department V.901 Code Summary Report Type of Situation •I* • Date greater than or equal to 01-01-1998 and Date less than or equal to 12-31-1990 •. 4 / Fire/Explosion • - ' • • - • • .Structure Fire . ^7 2.5 % 'Vehicle Fire • • • , . ,10 3.6 % • * . • • • • • •Trees. Brush, Grass Fire 7 2.5 % * d Refuse Fire • - ..3 1.1 % •• •Subtotals:27 9.9 % ••Rescue Call .0 Rescue Call •41 15.1 % . i.Emergency Medical Call 115 42.4 % Search ( . . • • • ♦ 0 ■ “1 0.3 % * # • . .. . . • . • ^• ••Subtotals:157 •67.9 % Hazardous Condition . 0 • • • ^ • - * • • • • ' •Spill/Leak No Ignition -5 1.8 % • A • • • * * •Power Line Down ♦14 . 5.1 % • • 0 % •. • ^ Service Call a Subtotals: * , • 19 7.0 % . g % • ■. • • . . • ’ •Service Call • ', • • * » •1 •0.3 %* • % \ . . ;Smoke/Odor Removal 4 1.4 % Assist Police •2 0.7 % »Unauthorized Bumififl ••.2 . 0.7 % * .Service Call . ..•1 0.3 % • * • 'Subtotals:10 3.6 % ttti Good Intent Cali 0' • . •Good Intent Call • ^3 1.1 % ♦ ■ ^ ,Smoke Scare • *20 7.3 % ■, t ' . ' Controlled Burning «1 . 0.3 % « . A Vicinity Alarm 27 9.9 % * • . * • *• ^ ♦ 0 , * •Subtotals:.61 18.8 % * ; '. . •«HK False Call •* False Call 2 0.7 % •Bomb Scare, No Bomb 1 0.3 % t System Malfunction 4 1.4 % • ■Subtotals:»7 2.6 % Total Incident Count:271 \ ' X * • ^ i • • / ■ % • i Maple Plain Fire Department Departmental Activity Report 01-01-1998 to 12-31-1998 00:00 to 24:00 All Stations Fire Alarm Responses • I .• ; • * Activity Type Current Period Category Count staff Hrs Count Fire Alarm Situations• Fire/Explosion 27 403.50 44 Good Intent Call 51 452.00 43 Hazardous Condition 19 217.00 46 Other False Call 7 95.00 2 Rescue 157 1582.50 168 Service Call 10 85.00 7 • •• * $ . • Total for Type: 271 2835.00 310 •. * > *• . * . : 1998luwU • I997 Prior Year Period Staff Hrj 822.5C 390.0C 385.0C 12.0C 1764.5C 62.0C 3436.0C . I . ' V .* • • 4 .U Maple Plain Fire Departrnent * • , • • . . ' . • • Calls per City Summary ' ' Date greater than or equal to 01-01-1998 and Date less than or equal to 12-31-1998 ;.« City Count Percent • % * • * Baker Park 4 1.4 % Independence 94 34.6 % Medina 9 3.3 % Maple Plain 117 43.1 % Minnetrista 17 6.2 % Orono 25 9.2 % Out Of District 5 1.8 % Total Incident Count:271 • . t • r « f •• •'> •... •r'.. % ^ ^» I * .* »} .* > • : ,. . Maple Plain Fire Department Average Response Time by District 1. / ■ r * Date greater than or equal to 01-01-1998 and Date less than or equal to 12*31rl998 - ' ‘ .• • V v.% ; • • • . * * s’ * 'i i r •. ..•• ■ . •‘- :*;V. ^ . -V *;/• . vV*. f , . . V .. >* •. . • * • • * . i, Baker Park Independence . . Medina Maple Plain • Minnetrista Orono Out Of District • * •* • *. Average Time to District *.* / - V ' . 3 Minutes 0 « Seconds 5 Minutes • 33 Seconds 5 Minutes ■ 7 Seconds 3 Minutes 52 Seconds 7 Minutes 11 Seconds 6 Minutes 17 Seconds 11 Minutes 12 Seconds / • %. I Total Incident Count: 271 » M Overall Average Response Time 5 Minutes 3 Seconds • • i > •: . . > ' .* ./ • _ ^ .. • ; .* s. . * * • . V . Maple Plain Fire Department Years of Service as of Wed Feb 3,1999 I * Name:Rank:Hire Date:# of Years S wenspQi. XPIiY. R ErPDklJn^ James D Mey er, Roger W Couser. Euge ne A__ Walton. Jeff H_____ Eisinger, David C__ RIsengejer, A! L____ Mevissen , Mark W . ______________ Brooks. Doug__;__ iz^k, Todd J______ Henrich, John W Denneson, Rick J b'Brian, Ran dy L •^Denne son, Troy A Coyser,Jtradl^___ Grenell, Dennis H___ Lowery. Thomas R Fneriguter 02-02-1970 z.c;.u^ Firefighter ........... • • •* •• CG-G5-1972 • •• • . •.». zo.oo Firefighter 06-05-1972 26.68 Assistant Chief 02-04-1974 25.01 Firefighter 07-12-1976 "“22.58 Fire Chief 10-02-1976 22.35 Firefighter 09-12-1977 21.41 Firefighter 11-05-1979 19.26 Firefighter 09-08-1980 18.42 J_____ Firefighter 09-23-1980 18.38 Firefighter "10-02-1983 "'15.35 Firefighter 01-21-1985 14.04 President . 06-07-1985 13.67 Captain 08-22-1985 13.46 Firefighter 12-28-1987 il.11 Assistant Chief 05-10-1988 10.74 Lieutenant ’C7-1S-13SS~10.55 Firefighter 07-20-1988 ib.55 Lieutenant 08-01-1988 10.52 Swenson. Brian R Scott. Nathan J ____FirsfigM®/______ ____firefighter ______ Captain 09-01-1990 d6-l ‘o'-19'92 07-29-1992 8.43 sis 6.52 Jerde. Nathan G Secretary 07-07-1993 5.58 Justen, Jon M Firefighter 01-08-1996 3.07 Freitag, Scott A Firefighter 04-08-1996 2.82 Wojitowicz, Chris J Firefighter 08-13-1996 . 2.48 Doyle. Chris J Firefighter 02-04-1997 2.00_ Piper. Ryan Probationary 05-27-1998 0.69 Total Personnel Listed: 28 02-03-1999 05:29 Page i COUNCIL MEETING JUN 1 4 1999 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETINGCITY Oh UHUNO MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 ROLL The Orono City Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Bob Sansevere, Charles Kelley, Barbara Peterson, and Richard Flint. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Public Works Director Greg Gappa, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. Item ^1 follows Item U2. CONSENT AGENDA (#2) APPROVE/AMEND Items 8, 9, II, 12, 14, 15, 17, and 19 through 25 were added to the Consent Agenda. Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. i (#1) TOWNLINE ROAD OPTIONS City Administrator Moorse stated the Cities of Maple Plain and Medina, along with Mn/DOT, are requesting the City of Orono support their proposal to close and construct a cul-de-sac at the north end of Townline Road to enable a signalized intersection at Highway 12 and County Road 29 be constructed to solve a substantial traffic safety problem. Moorse stated Mn/DOT is requesting the closure of Townline Road because reconstruction of the existing railroad overpass at Townline Road is cost prohibitive. Moorse commented that the benefits of closing Townline Road would enable Mn/DOT to construct a signalized intersection at Highway 12 and County Road 29 which would substantially improve safety as well as eliminate through traffic on Townline Road. This intersection would also eliminate an at-grade railroad crossing and an access to Highway 12 but would provide a new access to homes east of Townline Road and south of the railroad tracks. One of the disadvantages of closing Townline Road is the elimination of the ability by Townline Road residents to use Highway 12 as an access to Maple Plain or to directly access Highway 12 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 (^1 Townline Road Options, Continued) as a route to the east and would require the residents to utilize County Road 6 as the route to the east and as the route to Maple Plain. Traffic on Broadmoor Lane may also increase as a result of people utilizing that road as a shortcut to Maple Plain. Moorse noted that emergency public safety access is eliminated to Townline Road via Highway 12, requiring access from County Road 6. Moorse recommended that the City of Orono retain the potential to reopen Townline Road in the fiiture should the City Council elect to proceed forward with Mn/DOT ’s proposal. Moorse noted that Mayor Johnson of the City of Independence has written a letter expressing his opposition to closing Townline Road. Mayor Jabbour commented that this is the third time that the City of Orono has discussed this issue, noting that the public hearing was held at the first meeting with little information being available at that time. Jabbour stated that the people in attendance at tonight ’s meeting will have an opportunity to speak regarding this matter. Mayor Jabbour stated that the railroad bridge would need to be reconstructed because it does not meet Mn/DOT ’r highway standards for a stoplight. Tom O’Keefe, Mn/DOT Representative, stated the railroad bridge has an insufficient horizontal and vertical clearance to allow Townline Road to remain open due to the safety concerns that exist at that intersection. O’Keefe noted that the accident rate at this intersection is high and that a stoplight would help alleviate the safety hazards that currently exist at that location. Mn/DOT is not proposing to reconstruct the railroad bridge due to tlie excessive cost, which is estimated to be approximately five million dollars. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the City could retain the potential to reopen Townline Road in the future should the City so desire. O’Keefe remarked that he does not see that as a possibility unless the City wanted to assume the costs involved with reconstruction of the railroad bridge. Dave Jcllison, 4750 Creekwood Trail, commented that people currently use Townline Road and requested that the road not be closed, noting that in his opinion it is doubtful that it will be reopened in the future. Mike Martin, 4912 Broadmoor, commented that in his opinion this intersection was poorly designed in the beginning and questioned whether a stoplight would improve safety in that area. O’Keefe remarked that the intersection is not working as presently designed, noting that it ranks number three on MnDOT ’s accident list. O’Keefe stated that due to substandard sight lines that exist with the railroad bridge, it is unsafe to keep Townline Road open due to the possibility that people might run a yellow light and not see oncoming traffic coming from Townline Road. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24,1999 y* • A A M •• ■ I H II U V U ^ Council Member Kelley suggested that MnDOT install a stoplight at County Road 83 and Highway 12 first and see how things progress. O’Keefe stated in his opinion the intersection at Townline Road should be addressed first. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether this intersection could be made a right-turn only. O’Keefe stated that the same safety concerns would exist with traffic southbound on Highway 29. A resident in the audience inquired whether Mn/DOT would be agreeable to constructing the stoplight at that intersection with Townline Road remaining open for one year to see whether the accident rate is reduced. Mayor Jabbour commented that in his view Mn/DOT is not proposing those options and that Mn/DOT is requesting the City of Orono to approve their proposal as presented. Jabbour stated that in his opinion something needs to be done regarding this intersection, but that the City Council really has not been given the opportunity to review their options. Doug Hickey inquired whether Mn/DOT has considered lowering the speed limit in that area. O’Keefe stated the high number of accidents in that area has raised a concern which needs to be addressed. Mayor Jabbour stated he has a concern with the easements that have been constructed in Maple Plain onto Highway 12, with no frontage road being provided. Jabbour remarked that a comprehensive plan for this area should be developed. Kelley stated that a small parcel of land exists in Medina near Townline Road with plans being proposed to construct 17 residential units in that area, which will also need access, and that that area should be rezoned to five acre density to remain consistent with the surrounding land. Flint stated he has a concern about traffic being rerouted along Broadmoor. Sansevere stated he does not support Mn/DOT ’s proposal to close Townline Road at this time. Jane Slaughter, Orono, commented she would like the City Council to support Mn/DOT ’s proposal because the closing of Townline Road world enhance the safety of Highway 12 in that area. Slaughter stated that the City of Orono established a public cartway on either side of the Orono/Medina boundaiy from Townline Road and questioned whether the City Council will recognize that as a public crossing. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24. 1999 Towiiline Road Options, Continued) Tom Barrett, City Attorney, stated he is unfamiliar with the current status of that crossing, but that the City does have the right to request a crossing across the railroad tracks. Barrett stated he would need to review this situation further. Mayor Jabboiir inquired whether she was concerned that the City of Orono was not supporting her right to access to Highway 12. Slaughter remarked that she is veiy' concerned that is the case. Mayor Jabbour stated that the City of Orono will not leave any of its residents landlocked. Jabbour commented that the City has attempted to work together with Mn/DOT on this issue but were unable to reach an agreement on what should occur. Slaughter commented that her attorney did send the City a letter regarding these issues. Mayor Jabbour noted that the letter is included in the City Council’s packet. Jim Smith, Broadmoor, stated that the cost of reconstructing the bridge will only increase in the future and that the City needs to look at alternative routes to Maple Plain. Mayor Jabbour stated in his opinion the money that would be used to reconstruct the railroad bridge could better be utilized in the construction of frontage roads and the acquisition of proper!)-. Jabbour commented he would like the City of Orono to have an opportunity to look at their options more closely before a decision is reached on this issue. O’Keefe requested that the City of Orono write a letter outlining their specific concerns and questions regarding this project and that perhaps Mn/E)OT could redesign this project. Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to authorize City Staff to draft a letter to Mn/DOT outlining the concerns of the City Council, as well as requesting Mn/DOT to look at a comprehensive plan for County Road 6 and Highway 12 west to Delano. Flint requested that Mayor Jabbour amend his motion to have Mn/DOT look at Highway 12 west through Maple Plain. Jabbour amended his motion, Peterson seconded, to authorize City Staff to draft a letter to Mn/DOT outlining the concerns of the City Council, as well as requesting Mn/DOT to look at a comprehensive plan for County Road 6 and Highway 12 west through Maple Plain. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Mayor Jabbour requested that the City Attorney review the letter from the Slaughters and outline the City ’s position with regard to their access and the options available to the City, to be completed within two months. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 APPROVAL OF IVnMJTES *(#3) Regular Council Meeting of May 10,1999 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of May 10, 1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#4) Reconvened Board of Review Meeting of May 10, 1999 severe moved, Flint seconded, to approve the minutes of the Reconvened Board of Review Meeting of May 10, 1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#5) Special Council Meeting of May 11, 1999 (Woodhill Country Club Public Hearing) Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of May 11, 1999 (Woodhill Country Club Public Hearing), as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Jim White stated the Tour of Parks is scheduled for June 7, at 5:00 p.m., and invited the members of the City Council to attend this event. White stated that the Parks Commission has received a $5,000 donation for Saga Hills, and that the March for Parks raised appro.ximately $750. White noted that the March for Parks did not have an overwhelming turnout. White commented that the Parks Commission is considering construction of a half-court basketball court at the Bederwood Park. Mayor Jabbour stated that he has met with Hennepin Parks several times as well as the Cities of Minnetonka, Minnetrista, Mound and Spring Park regarding tlie Dakota Trail to Rail project. Jabbour noted that Hennepin Parks has included this trail in their comprehensive plan. Flint commented that he has received a complaint regarding the potential fire hazard that exists along the raiirrid tracks and the poor condition of the tracks. Mayor Jabbour .siareil that this track is considered to be e.xempt from inspections regarding the condition of the tri.-:k • Kelley stated work needs to be completed at Hackberry Park regarding the two baseball diamonds and requested that the Public Works Director look into the situation. (I I II ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Lili McMillan, LMCD Representative, thanked Mike Gaffron for appearing at the work session that the LMCD sponsored recently, noting that the turnout was poor from the other participating cities. McMillan noted that turnout on the part of the Board has also been poor recently and that many of the issues have been carried over to the next meeting. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the public was getting its due process if there was not a quorum of the Board in attendance at meetings. McMillan stated the president of the Board is concerned about this issue and is looking at the options available. Mayor Jabbour commented that there should have been better turnout at this last meeting since Orono was invited to attend this meeting as LMCD’s guest and there was not a quorum. McMillan stated that LMCD’s budget will be completed by July 1st. McMillan noted that there are some issues regarding the location where charter boats should be allowed to pick up and drop on passengers, noting that some charter boats currently pick up at private residences. Mayor Jabbour thanked McMillan for her efforts on this committee. McMillan noted that the City of Orono does put forth a good effort on this committee. PLANNING CO\rvnSSTON COMMENTS Janice Berg, Planning Commissi an Representative, stated she would be available for any questions the City Council may have regarding the applications tonight. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#6) U1321 ORONO SCHOOLS, 800 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH EXTINGUISH CITY EASEMENT Tom Crosby, Orono Schools, was present. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24,1999 (^1321 Orono Schools, Continued) GafTron stated the Orono School District had previously divided a 51 acre parcel on the east side of Old Crystal Bay Road into four large lots plus a road outlot in order to facilitate purchase of the property. At that time the City had required that the private road outlot, Outlot A, be platted to provide access to Lot 2, Block 1, which would otherwise be landlocked if for some reason the entire purchase was not completed. The School District is requesting that the road easement rights be extinguished per the developer ’s agreement. Crosby stated that the new school will be constructed in the vicinity of the outlot. In 1988, the School District entered into a contract to purchase a portion of this land, noting that the northeast comer is being leased by the City. Essentially the School District is requesting that the outlot and the four lots be combined. The 1988 agreement states that the easement may be extinguished provided the City retains its 10 foot perimeter easement. The City will also retain the drainage easement located in the area of the wetlands. Crosby stated he has been working with the City Attorney on a quit claim deed whereby the School District will provide a ten foot easement on Outlot A, and the easement will continue around the entire parcel and the wetland. Essentially this is a contract matter, not a street vacation, and would not require any public hearings since this is a request under the 1988 Developer ’s Agreement. Crosby stated that the School District has drafted a resolution for approval by the City, noting that there are a few minor details that still need to be worked out. City Attorney Barrett stated that he is satisfied with the School District’s proposal. The original contract called for a lot combination, which is what is being accomplished here, and not a replatting. Barrett noted that the City does need to retain the easement around the entire parcel. Barrett requested that the City Council pass a motion approving this proposal in principal and that the final document will be prepared and presented to the City Council at its next meeting. Kelley moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve in principal the School District’s proposal to vacate the easement on Outlot A provided that the City retains a 10 foot easement around the entire parcel, and to authorize the City' Attorney to prepare a resolution for approval bv the City Council at its next City Council meeting. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#7) #2169 mCHAEL RENARD, 1185 TONKAWA ROAD - AMENDMENT OF VARIANCE Michael Rcnard was present. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 (#2169 Michael Renard, Continued) Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting approval of a variance related to revising the structural coverage amount already approved in the 75-250 ’ hardcover variance approved in 1996. The Applicant is proposing to remove an existing shed and its associated hardcover and replacing it with a larger shed. The existing shed is currently located 2.36 feet from the property line, with the new shed being located 10.36 feet from the property line, which will place it outside the side yard setback. Weinberger stated the Applicant received a hardcover variance in 1996 to allow 26.7 percent in the 75-250 ’ lakeshore setback area, and is now proposing to trade the existing structural coverage in the 75-250 ’ lakeshore setback area. The existing garage and sidewalk will be removed and replaced with a larger garage. The Planning Commission recommended denial of this application based on the fact that no hardship inherent in the land was demonstrated to build a larger accessory building. City Staff is also recommending denial of this application because hardcover on this property currently exceeds over the 25 percent allowable hardcover. Weinberger noted that the hardcover figures have been corrected to reflect that the hardcover will remain at 26.7 percent. Renard stated that the new shed will be 12’ by 21’ and the existing shed is 12’ by 14’. The hardcover in the 75-250 ’ will increase from 8.4 percent to 8.7 percent, where 15 percent is allowed. Renard commented that the new shed will be located out of the side yard setback and that this application would remove the existing shed which is located 2.63 feet from the property line. Renard stated he would like to construct the larger garage to enable him to store his personal property indoors and to be secured as well as aesthetically improve the lot. Mayor Jabbeur stated at the time the building permit was obtained in 1996, two of the City' Council members thought that the existing shed should be ved at that time. Jabbour remarked that in general the City Council tries ' .. commodating to its residents, and at the time the resolution was passed, the City Council ai-s .ipting to make this shed legally conforming. Jabbour commented that in his opinion the existing shed was not constructed with a permit but had existed for a long time. Renard stated that the shed has been in existence for at least 40 to 50 years. Mayor Jabbour stated that if this application is approved, it sends the message that it is okay to build a residcuct a..d tl.cn come bavk later with a request to build a larger garage which would exceed the allowable hardcover. Jabbour stated the Applicant could remove the existing shed and construct a new shed to the same dimensions. Renard remarked that the new shed would serv'c a good purpose by allowing him to store his personal property indoors, noting that one of his trailers is 20.5 feet and the new shed will only be 21 feet long. 8 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 (#2169 Michael Renard, Continued) Sansevere commented that the new shed would be an improvement to what currently exists. Kelley inquired whether the Applicant is proposing to grow grass up to the residence and removing all the existing sidewalk. Renard stated that the walkway will be removed as part of the project. Sansevere stated he would like the existing shed relocated away from the property line. Sansevere inquired whether there already was a garage on this property. Renard stated that a garage does exist on the property and that this shed would function as storage for his two trailers. Peterson commented that she would have requested in 1996 that the shed be removed as part of the previous application, noting that she would be in favor of allowing the Applicant to keep what he presently has but to relocate the shed to make it legally conforming. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the Applicant could obtain a building permit for the new shed if constructed to the same size without a variance application. Gaffron stated that permits could be obtained to do cosmetic improvements and some structural improvements. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the Applicant would like the City Council to pass a motion to enable him to build a new shed to the same dimensions as the existing one. Renard stated he would certainly consider that proposal by the City Council. Sansevere inquired whether an>ihing could be done to accommodate the additional six feet that the Applicant is requesting. Mayor Jabbour stated he feels the recommendation by the Planning Commission should be followed. Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Application #2169, to allow (he Applicant to remove the existing shed at his option and to replace the existing shed with a new shed to the same dimensions meeting the side yard setback requirements. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24,1999 *m) mil BARRY & JANICE HAGLUND, 4590 NORTH ARM LANE - EXTEND EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4290 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4290, a Resolution Granting an Extension of the Effective Period of Preliminary Plat Approval for a Plat Proposed at 4590 North Arm Drive West. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(«9) #2438 ^^CHAEL SLETTEN/PETER ACHEY, 4680/4720 BAYSIDE ROAD - LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - REQUEST FOR EXTENSION - RESOLUTION NO. 4291 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4291, a Resolution Granting an Extension of the Effective Period of Final Subdivision Approval for a Lot Line Rearrangement at 4680/4720 Bayside Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#10) #2466 JAMES RENCKENS/JOHN WINSTON, 3020 WATERTOWN ROAD - PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL - RECONSIDERATION (Mayor Jabbour excused himself from this matter). James Renckens and John Winston were present. Kelley stated this application appeared before the City Council at its April 12 meeting where the preliminary plat application was approved 2-1. The Applicant later requested at the May 11 Council meeting that the City Council reconsider its action of April 12. The City Council on May 11 voted 3-0 to reconsider the application. The application was then tabled to allow the interested parties to be notified. Gaffron stated the Applicants have concerns regarding the creation of a 50 foot road outlet along the north property boundary due to the impact that it will have on the property. City Staff believes this issue stems in part from a philosophical difference between the City and its residents. The City has an obligation to protect the general public health, safety and welfare of its residents by establishing a local road system that provides access to the property, is adequate to allow for the e.xpected and required levels of general and emergency services, and is efficient to maintain. The property owners’ goal is a safe, private environment for families, and to accomplish this, the typical property owner prefers dead-end roads rather than connecting roads. On the other hand, the City has to provide corridors for future connections between private roads in order to establish a system that can be easily maintained and that will provide alternate means of access in times of emergency. The City also sets minimum design standards for private roads and long driveways in order to ensure that the required access by service, maintenance and emergency vehicles is feasible. These standards are consistent with the City’s comprehensive plan. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 (^2466 James Renckens/John Winston, Continued) City Staff believes that the zoning/subdivision code supports the position that a 50 foot private road outlet be platted along the north boundaiy'. Gaffron stated that the Applicant is proposing to construct a residence on the northern portion of this property with a driveway that would connect up to Crystal Creek Road. The Applicant has concerns regarding the septic sites; however, there may be other suitable septic sites available on this property. City Staff recommends a 50 foot corridor along the north portion of the property' and would prefer to see a 30 foot outlet along the west side that maintains the integrity' of the backlot ordinance. Sansevere inquired why Outlet B was not considered for the road access. Gaffron stated one reason is that the road would need to go through the middle of the two septic sites located on that ouilot. Winston commented that they arc appearing tonight before the City Council to have the preliminary plat resolution amended. When the subdivision is completed, there will be two lots that exist, one 3.5 acres and the other 8.5 acres. The property owner is proposing the subdivision to allow him the option to sell the 3.5 acre lot in the future. Winston stated that they would prefer not to plat the 50 foot road over the northern portion of the property. Winston noted that the City' of Orono does not follow a grid system for its roadways and that the City ’s map demonstrates a vast number of cul-de-sac streets due to the topography of the area. This proposal by the Applicant is consistent with what currently exists in the City and that the safetv and privacy are top concerns of the residents of Orono. Winston stated that the majority of the neighbors do not want to be connected to Crystal Bay Road. Renckens commented that in his opinion this proposal is a much better proposal than what was previously approved, noting that access off of Crystal Creek would provide safer access and would prefer not to have the outlot. Renckens stated he does not favor the 50 foot road outlet in that :t will create increased traffic and is in conflict with good City planning. Renckens indicated he still wishes to preserve the 30 foot access corridor to Watertown Road for potential ftiture subdivision access. Flint indicated he has given this application a lot of thought, but in his view he feels that tonight’s proposal is a better proposal than what was previously approved. Flint stated that access off of Cry stal Creek is much better than what was previously approved. Flint stated that what Exhibit D-3 reflects is not good for the neighborhood and would create a shortcut. Flint noted that he does have concerns regarding access to Crystal Creek ’s Outlot B, although the property owner has acknowledged that he is responsible for providing access to that property. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24,1999 (#2466 James Rcnckens/John Winston, Continued) Kelley noted that the Applicant is not giving up his right to go down to Watertown Road. Renckens stated he is willing to give up his right to access Watertown Road if that was made a condition by the City Council. Kelley commented that the access to Outlot B is being pushed to another property owner with this proposal. Sansevere noted that Carlson agreed in 1991 to assume the responsibility to provide access to his property. Flint commented that Carlson in his view will be able to negotiate that access with Mn/DOT. Peterson stated that she was on the City Council in 1991, when this 50 foot road outlot was discussed, and will coiuiiiue lo vote in favor of die road. Alan Carlson, 3125 Fox, inquired how this matter will be voted on. Kelley stated if there is a tie, the Mayor will be asked if he wishes to vote on this matter, and if the Mayor declines to vote on this matter, the motion for reconsideration will fail and will go back to the original application. t Flint commented that the vote for reconsideration occurred at the City Council’s last meeting and that the reconsideration is before the Council at this time. Kelley stated if there is a tie and the Mayor declines to vote on this matter, then the application will be denied and a new application will need to be submitted. Flint stated that the Cit>* Council is being requested to amend the application to have the access off of Crystal Creek. Gaffron stated that the Planning Commission had recommended a 50 foot road outlot at the time they considered the original application. Kelley remarked that what is before the City Council is the original application where a 30 foot access corridor would be required on the southern part of the property and a 50 foot road outlot would be required across the northern section of the property. Winston stated that the original application was for a two lot subdivision with no outlots. The Planning Commission had recommended the establishment of a 30 foot and a 50 foot outlot. L ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 (^2466 James Rcnckens/John Winsto", Continued) vviiicii is what come ucfoic liic City Council at one of their picvluus meetings. \V''inston stated that they are not requesting any outlets with their application. The City Council had approved the application with the 50 foot outlet at the rear but did not require the 30 foot outlet. Winston stated that it is the decision of the City Council to determine what outlets, if any, are necessary with this subdivision. Kelley commented that Mr. Winston’s view is correct to his understanding. Carlson commented that he wrote a letter regarding the history of this property, noting that he inadvertently forgot to copy a portion of the letter. In 1991 it was anticipated that Crystal Creek Road would be extended across the north piece of the Stubbs property. In exchange for that road, the Stubbs property was expected to be able to access off of Crystal Creek Road. Carlson remaiked that the Resolution passed by the City Council stated that Carlson’s undeveloped land north of Crystal Creek would also hook up with the Crystal Creek Road through A. Stubbs property. Carlson stated that this was the long-range plan of the City in 1991, and would provide his property with access. Carlson remarked in his opinion Mn/DOT will not allow access off of the new Highway 12, and that this 50 foot road outlot is necessaiy'. Carlson stated in his opinion it is inappropriate for Mr. Winston to send the letters that he sent to the City Council members and was intended to intimidate and vilify Mr. Kelley. Winston stated that there are two incorrect statements that were made by Mr. Carlson; one, that any road across the northern portion of the property being a benefit to the property owner is erroneous. Currently there is no right by Mr. Renckens to access Crystal Bay Road and there is no easement that exists. Mr. Renckens will need to negotiate access off of Crystal Bay Road. Number two, Mr. Carlson does not have any right to access off of the Renekens’ property. The establishment of the 50 foot road across the northern section of the property will not benefit Mr. Carlson’s property because it is a private road. Winston stated that if an outlot is imposed by the City, that does not entitle Mr. Carlson to any rights to utilize that road absent of the City stating that this will be a public roadway. Renckens stated that in his opinion Mr. Carlson docs not have the right to tell the City Council members what he would like to see as far as traffic safety is concerned. Renckens commented that Mr. Carlson had the option to purchase the piece of land at the top of Stubbs property and that Mr. Carlson is now attempting to take his land for his own personal gain. Flint inquired if this application is denied, when a new application could be submitted. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24,1999 (^2466 James Rcnckcns/John Winston, Continued) City Attorney Barrett stated that in his opinion there is no time period on a subdivision. GafTron stated that the Applicant can submit a new application for a subdivision, but if it is denied, the Applicant needs to wait six months. Flint requested that City Staff verify whether the Applicant would be required to wait to submit a new application. (Recess taken at 9:22 p.m. - 9:27 p.m.). Kelley stated that it has been determined that the Applicants did receive a variance, which was for a 30 foot outlot, and that the City Council approved the subdivision and granted the variance by a 2-1 vote. If the application is denied tonight, the Applicant will need to wait six months to submit a new application. City Attorney Barrett concurred with Kelley’s statement. Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Application #2466, 3020 Watertown Road, without the requirement for a 50 foot outlot on Lot No. 1 and with the variance for a 30 foot outlot on Lot No. 2, with the understanding that the Applicant will negotiate access off of Crystal Creek Road with the Crystal Creek Homeowners Association. Kelley inquired whether the motion included the 30 foot outlot. Flint indicated that was included in his motion, with access being negotiated off of Crystal Creek. Kelley inquired how the City would become aware of the fact that access was granted off of Crystal Creek. Flint stated that access off of Crystal Creek would be a condition of the subdivision. Kelley commented that the Applicant will need to present a letter to the City from the Crystal Creek Homeowners Association indicating that Flint amended his motion, Sansevere seconded, to include the condition that the Applicant submit a letter showing that access will be allowed off of Crystal Creek Road from the Crystal Creek Homeowners Association before the final plat is approved on this subdivision. VOTE: Ayes 2, Nays 2, Kelley and Peterson opposed. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 (#2466 James Renckens/John Winston, Continued) City Attorney Barrett stated because the motion was unsuccessful, the application for a subdivision has been declined and that a resolution stating the reasons for the denial should be brought back before the City Council at its next meeting. The Applicant would then be required to wait six months before a new application can be submitted since this variance was denied. Mayor Jabbour indicated that he does intend to vote on the new application, noting that he abstained on this matter tonight because he has made an offer on this property for his daughter. keiiey inquired wneiner the Applicants would be required to go bac?^ before the Planning Commission. Mayor Jabbour stated a new application would need to be submitted to the Planning Commission. *(#11) #2469 STEVEN AND JO WEBSTER, 500 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4292 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4292, a Resolution Granting Variances to Setbacks to Allow a Residential and Garage Addition to the Existing Residence Located at 500 Orono Orchard Road South. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#12) #2483 TRENT REZABEK, 3200 BAYSIDE ROAD - VARIANCE RENEWAL RESOLUTION NO. 4293 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4293, a Resolution Granting Variances to Permit Construction of an 8* by 12 ’ Entryway Addition to the Existing Residence Located at 3200 Bayside Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#13) #2484 WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WOODHILL ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Mayor Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to table Application #2484 to the June 14, 1999 City Council meeting. VOTE: Ayes 4-0-1, Kelley Abstained. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 *(#14) #2485 ALEX AND CATHY JOHNSTON, 940 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE PEIUVOT - RESOLUTION NO. 4294 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4294, a Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Guest House for Property Located at 940 Brown Road South. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#15) #2487 ROBERTA A. ROTH, 1251 BRIAR STREET - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4295 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4295, a Resolution Granting Variances to Permit Removal of an Existing House and Construction of a New Residence on the Existing Foundation for Property Located at 1251 Briar Street VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#16) #2493 KATHERINE TAYLOR HOMES, 692 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4296 Katherine Taylor was present. Barbara Pugh, property owner, was present. Weinberger stated that the Applicant is requesting several variances to construct a two-car garage where a one car garage exists and attach a deck to the second garage on the property. Currently there are two garages on the property, the first is a one-stall detached located on Tonkawa Road and the second is a two-car garage attached to the house. Weinberger stated the property owner had converted a cabin into a year-round residence and that this property does contain a higher water table. Weinberger stated the one-stall garage is presently located 2.3 feet from the property line and would require variances to the side yard setback and street setback to add a second stall to the garage. The second option that is before the City Council tonight is proposing to construct a two-car detached garage which would require a variance to the existing hardcover. This garage would replace the existing one-stall garage located 10 feet from Tonkawa Road. Weinberger stated the second portion of this application is requesting a variance to construct a second story deck and spiral staircase to the existing residence. These improvements have received building permits and are currently underway. A hardcover variance is being requested to allow the deck to be located within the 75-250 ’ setback from the lake. This will be new hardcover that will not increase the amount of hardcover because the deck will be located over existing hardcover. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 (#2493 Katherine Taylor Homes, Continued) Weinberger remarked that Option A would require hardcover in the amount of 70.2 percent where currently 42.5 percent exists, and Option B is proposing hardcover in the amount of 52.9 percent where 42.5 percent currently exists. The Planning Commission recommended to approve the variance to construct a second story deck and spiral staircase to the existing residence and to deny variances to pennit a nvo stall detached garage near the street property line. City Staff is also recommending denial of the application for additional structure for the garage because it would exceed the allowable 15 percent structural coverage. Staff is recommending approval of the variance for the deck above the attached garage. Pugh stated that she will be getting married in the near future and that the additional room is needed for storage of the extra vehicle and other items. Pugh commented that in her opinion it would be better from an aesthetic point of view to store the vehicles inside rather than leaving them sit outside which creates a cluttered look, noting that she currently pays for off-site storage. Taylor commented to her understanding the hardcover numbers are not accurate. Mayor Jabbour stated that the hardcover figures should be determined by a surveyor, and if the hardcover numbers are incorrect, then the application should be sent back to the Planning Commission once the new figures are obtained. Taylor stated that she would like those numbers to be verified. Taylor commented that the property owner is requesting additional storage space on this parcel. Mayor Jabbour stated that by state law the Applicant must demonstrate a hardship that is inherit to the land in order to be granted a variance. Jabbour commented that it is highly unreasonable to have three cars on a parcel of land that consists of only one-third of an acre. Kelley remarked that the Applicant needs to verify the hardcover numbers and structural coverage before the City Council can act on this application. Weinberger stated that the actual lot area is calculated correctly, but the issue is how that hardcover is broken down between the two setbacks. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to tabic Application #2493, 692 Tonkawa Road, to allow the Applicant time to verify the hardcover numbers. NO VOTE TAKEN. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24,1999 (^2493 Katherine Taylor Homes, Continued) Taylor inquired whether both portions of the application were being tabled tonight. Mayor Jabbour stated that both portions of the application are being tabled. Kelley stated that if the garage is taken out, then he does not have a problem with the deck. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to withdraw the motion to table this application. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. The Applicant was advised to revise the survey to correct the hardcover calculations. Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4296 approving the portion of Application #2493, 692 Tonkawa Road, granting a variance to construct a second story deck and spiral staircase to the existing residence, and to amend the resolution to reflect the hardcover figures in the 75-250’ setback and in the 250-500’ setback. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#17) #2494 DAN ANDERSEN, 2885 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4297 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4297, a Resolution Granting a Variance to Permit an Oversized Accessory Building to be Relocated on the Property Absent of a Principal Structure. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#13) #2495 BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 1025 BROWN ROAD SOUTH A. Carriage Hill Final Plat Steven Bohl, on behalf of Bohland Development, was present. Weinberger stated tiiC*. some issues had arisen since approval of the plat of Carriage Hill on May 10, 1999. Tliose issues have since been resolved and a few minor changes to the plat have occurred, including revised legal descriptions and coitecting lot dimensions. However, the lot arrangement and road layout have not changed from the Preliminary Plat Approval. City Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the addition to the final plat stating that Lot 1, Block 1 will have covenants placed over them, noting that the Applicant does agree with that provision. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24,1999 (#2495 Bohland Development, Continued) B. Entrance Monuments Plan for Carriage Hill - Resolution No. 4298 Weinberger stated that the mylars have been submitted and that the recording of the easements over Lots 5 and 6 is required adjacent to Outlot C. Tlie monuments would be located in each of the comers. The resolution requiring the monuments is in the City Council’s packet, and the Applicant is proposing a concrete monument with a stone finish. The owner is responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of these monuments. City Staff is rcr minnding approval of the monument plan, which was a requirement before final plat approval. City Attorney Barrett stated that he is comfortable with this application now that the mylars have been submitted. The Applicant had no comment. Kelley moved, Sansevcrc seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4298, a Resolution Approving the Entrance Monument Plan for Carriage Hill. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor j’abbour remarked that he is concerned about the lack of attendance at the LMCD meetings and that the citizens of Orono may not be receiving the best service due to the poor attendance. Jabbour commented that Orono ’s Senior Planning Coordinator was invited to give a presentation at LMCD s last meeting, which was very' poorly attended and was, in his view, a waste of Mr. Gaffron ’s time. Jabbour stated that the LMCD should perhaps look at how they can improve that board. May'or Jabbour stated that the City Council should have clear thresholds established which should be followed by the City Council in making a determination on whether to revisit an application to avoid people coming back time and time again. Jabbour stated that the residents should be given their rights and that the City Council needs to be consistent in their decisions. Moorse indicated that this issue has been discussed at the Planning Commission level as well md that the Applicants need to conform to the conditions requested by the Planning Commission. Kelley inquired before an item is piaced on the consent agenda if the people in attendance at the meeting should be given an opportunity to speak on a specific application. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 (Mayor/Council Report, Continued) Flint noted that the general public has an opportunity to speak to an application at the Planning Commission level. Mayor Jabbour suggested that perhaps a line could be added to the Zoning Administrator's report indicating if there are any concerns by the neighbors. Kelley inquired whether the City Council should make a decision on the applicants for the Planning Commission vacancy. Moorse indicated that there was one more candidate that indicated a desire to be interviewed. Kelley noted that the candidate had two opportunities to appear and has not done so. It was the consensus of the City Council that they were in support of Daniel K:uth and Jay Nygaard. Peterson moved, Kclle} seconded, to appoint Jay Nygaard and Daniel Kluth to the Planning Commission, effective immediately, and to direct City Staff to send a letter to all the applicants thanking them for their interest. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Kelley suggested that the Uvo new appointees be invited to meet with City Staff to familiarize themselves with Orono ’s Comprehensive Plan and the City’s Ordinances. Kelley requested that the City Administrator look at the possibility of hiring a fire marshal for the City of Orono rather than contract one out. Kelley requested that he be notified of the Fire Commission meetings when the new fire station will be discussed. Peterson indicated that she would be willing to be an alternate. Flint stated that he has been contacted by Shingobee Builders who have indicated that there is a potential buyer for the church property in Navarre, but that they have concerns regarding the limited parking. Flint suggested that perhaps the municipal parking lot could be utilized on Sunday to accommodate the parking on Sunday. Flint stated that a meeting is eduled for Tuesday at 9:00 a.m., to discuss this site and questioned whether someone from City Staff could attend that meeting as well. Gaffron stated that there are building code issues that would need to be addressed before the building could be occupied. Gaffron commented that utilizing the municipal parking lot on the weekends would not pose a problem. Flint commented that in his view it would be a mistake to wait until an application is submitted before meeting with the prospective developer. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 (Mayor/Councii Report, Continued) Moorse stated that the people who would best be able to answer their questions are unable to attend Tuesday’s meeting, but that perhaps an invitation could be extended to them to meet with City Staff another time. Cappa stated that he will have someone from the Public Works Department attend the meeting but that it will be necessary to meet with the building official at a later time. Flint commended Gappa on the letter he WTOte regarding the project on Femdale. ENGINEER REPORT City Engineer Tom Kellogg had nothing to report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT *(#19) Water Meter for Golf Course Irrigation System Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve purchase of a water meter for the golf course irrigation system from Bergerson and Caswell, Inc., for $2,153.96 to be paid for from the Golf Course Fund, and to amend the 1999 Golf Course Capital Outlay Budget to include this expenditure. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#20) Adoption of 1997 Uniform Building Code with State Amendments - Ordinance No. 188, 2nd Series Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 188, Second Series, and to adopt the updated version of the Minnesota State Building Code (1997 UBC), and to direct Citv ’ Staff to prepare an amendment of the Orono Fee Schedule for Council’s action at their June 14, 1999 meeting to reflect an increase of approximately 11 percent in building permit fees. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#21) CDBo Joint Cooperative Agreement - Resolution No. 4299 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4299, a Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement Beriveen the City of Orono and Hennepin County for Participation in the Urban Hennepin Count>’ Community Development Block Grant Program in Fiscal Year 2UU0 - 2002. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 *(#22) 1999 Interfund Transfers and Loan Payment Sanscvere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the interfund operating transfers, loan payments and special assessment payments on City owned property as presented, effective April 30, 1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#23) Authorization of Temporary Full-time Work Schedule for Officer Tony Wittke Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to authorize Officer Tony Wittke to be placed into a full-time work schedule on a temporary basis effective May 18, 1999, at a pay rate of S14.13 per hour, to continue until Officer Steve McNally returns to duty. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#24) Authorization of Partial Refund of Building Permit Fee Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to authorize the partial refund of fees to Tony Eiden Company in the amount of Sl,659.81. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#25) Call Bond Sale to Fund Sewer Projects - Resolution No. 4300 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4300, a Resolution Providing f"*’ the Sale of 51,190,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT City Attorney Tom Barrett had nothing to report. *(#26) LICENSES Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the following licenses: Residential Kennel License: Eric and Kristal Wilson 2683 North Shore Drive ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24,1999 (U26 Licenses, Continued) Garbage & Refuse Collector ’s License: Craig Baldy Baldy Sanitation 5906 Henry Sti cet Maple Plain, MN 55359 Pamela Tesch BFI - Browning Ferris Industries 9813 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55437 Douglas Hawkinson Cleanway Sanitation, Inc. P.O. Box 220 Long Lake, MN 55356 Donald Rachel Veit Container Corp dba Veit Disposal Systems 14000 Veit Place Rogers, MN 55374 *(#27) BILLS I . Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to approve of the All Funds Account V'OTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 10:40 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda Vee, City Clerk I I I [ (It 0 k IS 1 o i i £ CD c § 1 < w mmC REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUhir^n MPETiNG JUN 1 4 1999 DATE: 5TITEM NO: Department Approval: {Same Stephen Weckmon Title On-Site Systems Manager Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Administrator's Report Item Description: Kurt Schmid, 160 Golden View Rd. - Appeal of Administrative Decision Attachment: Site Survey SUMMARY: We have denied Mr. Schmid's request to relocate his driveway within 5 feet of the five bedroom drainfield area. The request was denied for the following reasons: 1) the expansion area of the primary drainfield site would be destroyed in order to achieve proper drainage around the driveway 2) no valid hardship exists 3) approval of the request would limit the future potential of the property 4) approval would set a bad precedent HISTORY: The Orono Municipal Code pertaining to septic systems was revised in 1992 to require the design and protection of five bedroom drainfield sites for all new lot divisions. The rule change was made because we received many complaints from buyers of new lots who felt it very limiting that they could not built a five bedroom residence on a two acre lot. The City Council at that time agreed that allowing new properties to be limited to four bedroom residences was not in the best interest of tlie commaziity and the Municipal Code was changed to require five bedroom drainfield sites. The property owner, Mr. Schmid, is requesting permission to use the expansion area for the primary drainfield site to build a driveway for his new residence that is currently under construction. In order to provide access for the construction of the residence, a driveway has already been constructed that meets a twenty foot setback to the five bedroom drainfield site as it is shown on the survey for the proposed residence. Mr. Schmid feels that th-* rules are overly restrictive since he is only building a four bedroom residence and he does not intend to add a fifth bedroom. He wishes to build the driveway five feet from the five bedroom drainfield area which would be tw'enty feet from a four bedroom system. We have rejected Mr. Schmid's request because there is currently a suitable driveway which does not impact the future expansion area and eliminaiing lire future drainfield areas does not meet the intent of the Municipal Code and it would set a bad precedent to allow an exception without a viable hardship. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to support staffs decision regarding the septic site requirement. BEQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: ^ministrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron^l^**^^^ Title: Senior Planning Coordinator COUNCIL MEETING JUN 1 4 1999 Gl I Y Ul- OttUNO Date: June 10, 1999 Item No,’•* [p Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1321 - Orono Schools, 950 Old Crystal Bay Road North - Extinguish Road and Utility Easement in Outlot A, Orono School Expansion - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Documents provided by Attorney Tom Crosby for Adoption B - Staff Memo of 5-21-99 On May 24 Council approved in principle the termination of the Road and Utility Easement in Outlot A, Orono School Expansion, allowing the City to complete its obligations under the terms of the 1988 Developer's Agreement. A 10’ easement at the east and west ends of outlot A will be retained. Attorney Tom Crosby on behalf of the School District has provided the attached document for extinguishing the City's easement rights. These documents will be reviewed by City Attorney Tom Barrett prior to the Council meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize the appropriate City representatives to sign the documents extinguishing the City's easement rights over Outlot A, Orono School Expansion per the terms of the Developed Agreement dated November 28, 1988. COPY Faegre & Benson llp 2200 Norwest C enter , 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis . Minnesota 55402-3901 telephone 612-336-3000 FACSIMILE 612-336-3026 COPY June 9, 1999 Thomas NL C rosby , Jr . TCrotby^fiMgre com 612/336-3127 ^ ^ Thomas J. Barrett Hinshaw & Culbertson 222 S. Ninth St., Ste 3200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: ISO No. 278 City of Orono ... . 7^ iJUii I I \rj'i Or U.-iC.X’O Dear Tom: In preparation for the Council meeting on the evening of June 14* I am enclosing a revised Resolution and an Easement Agreement for your review. The Resolution is marked to show changes from the 5/24/99(2) draft. The only change is the addition is the undertaking of the School District to provide 10 foot utility easements on the easterly and westerly 10 feet of Outlot A which will give to the City a continuous perimeter easement around the entire property. I have also enclosed an Easement Agreement whereby the School District will grant the easements. Finally, 1 am enclosing the quit claim deed 1 had previously prepared whereby the City quit claims its interest i.i Outlot A. The only change from the earlier document is a specific reference in the deed to the easements rights being relinquished. I believe these three documents should be sufficient for action on Monday. I have submitted the abstract to the title company for updating. Because the abstract was most recently updated to 1991, the subsequent work should not take much time. Title work will follow. Accordingly, the City’s action should be subject to the title work. Sincerely, Thomas M. Crosby, Jr. TMC:koecf Enclosures cc: Neal Lawson Mike Gaffron Ml 506679 01 Minneapolis Denver Des Moines London Frankfurt mm9 (2^6/9/99 RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ORONO WHEREAS, the City of Orono entered into a Developer’s Agreement for the plat of Orono Sciiool Expansion dated November 2f . 1988 to facilitate the platting by Independent School District No. 278 (School District) of certain property intended for future expansion by the School District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Developer’s Agreement certain rights were given to the City of Orono with respect to Outlot A which was platted as an access road for the plat known as Orono School Expansion; and WHEREAS, no improvements have been constructed on Outlot A; and WHEREAS, the School District now intends to construct a school building on the Orono School Expansion and to consolidate into a single tax parcel all of the separate tax parcels which presently comprise the Orono School Expansion plat; and WHEREAS, Section 2.5 of the Developer’s Agreement provides that: “If neither of the contingencies set forth in Section 2 1(a) [failure to acquire title] nor (b) [development of the property] occurs, or if the Developer acquires fee simple absolute title to all of the Property within said eleven (11)- year period [ending November 28, 1999], then the City shall, upon the Developer’s petition for combination of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Lots 1 and 2, Block 2,2ind Outlot A into a single lot, provide the necessary resolutions, approvals and other reasonable documentation, all in recordable form, to grant approval of such combination, to vacate, abandon arid terminate the Easement in Outlot A, and all other such easements, except those which adjoin the outer boundary lines of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 aiid Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, and to terminate this Agreement.”, and WHEREAS, School District has, within the applicable time period requested the vacation, abandonment and termination of the easement in Outlot A zind certain other easements as described in Section 2.5 of the Developer’s Agreement; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Developer’s Agreement and as a result of the request of the School District, the City of Orono hereby terminates the easement on Outlot A and, subject to the following resolutions. relinquishes any and all other property rights to said Outlot A; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Orono hereby terminates the ten foot utility ease.nents created by the Orono School Expansion plat in all areas except with respect to (i) such 10 foot easements on the outer boundary lines of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 and (ii) the drainage easements on the Easterly portion of Lot 2, Block 2, wnich such easements as described in (i) and (ii) shall net be terminated and shall continue in full force and effect. FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Orono shall execute an deliver a quit claim deed to the School District with respect to said Outlot A, and FUR1 condition to the forei Orono. the School District shall grant ten foot utility ea<;pmpnt«; on the FagtpHv anH W p^w I FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute and deliver the quit claim deed referred to in the preceding paragraph. MMOomoatiLS -2- EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 1999, by and between Orono Independent School District No. 278 (“Orono”), an independent school district and political subdivision of the State of Minnesoia (the “School District”), and the City of Orcno, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “City”). WHEREAS, the School District is the owner of Outlot A, according to the plat of Orono School Expansion, recorded in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota (“Outlot A”). WHEREAS, the City has relinquished by quit claim deed various easement rii,Iits granted in an Easement Agreement dated December 2, 1998 recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on April 13, 1989 as Document No. 5524092. WHEREAS, the City has required that the School District grant to the City by quit claim the easement hereinafter set forth. WHEREAS, the School District desires to grant to the City such easement subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of One and no/lOOths Dollar ($1.00), the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows; ' 1. The School District hereby grants by quit clzum to the City a non­ exclusive easement for drainage and utility purposes and for no other purpose over, under and across; The West 10 feet of Outlot A; and The East 10 feet of Outlot A. 2. The duration of the easement created herein shall be perpetual. 3. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. ( I IN WITNESS WTIEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. SCHOOL DISTRICT: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL Dii,rRICT NO. 278 (ORONO) By: Its: And by: Its: CITY: CITY OF ORONO By: Its: And by: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____, 1999, by____________________, the__________ day of and , the of Independent School District No. 278 (Orono), an independent school district ard political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the school district. Notary Public -2- % • / I )1 QUIT CLAIM DEED (Corporation or Partnership to Corporation or Partnership) Based on Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978) STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date:^ 1999 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, City of Orono, a municipal corporation under the laws of Miiuiesota, Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to Orono Independent School District No. 278, Grantee, an independent school district and political subdivision of the State of Mimiesota, real property in Hennepin County, Miimesota, described as follows: All rights granted to the City of Orono in the Easement Agreement dated December 2,1988 and recorded April 13, 1989 as Document No. 5524092 in the office of the Heimepin County Recorder, all with respect to Outlet A, Orono School Expansion together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. CITY OF ORONO Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here Its Mayor Its City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this bv and day of ^ 1999. of Orono, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation. , the Mayor and City Clerk of City SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT Ta.x Statements for the real property described in this instrument should be sent to (Include name and address of Grantee) THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS): FAEGRE & BENSON LLP (TMC) 2200 Norwest Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901 Phone: 612-336-3000 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road North Long Lake, MN 55356 Phone: 612-449-8300 MMOMUOI REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: May 21,1999 Item No.: Department Approval: Actoinistrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #1321 - Orono Schools, 950 Old Crystal Bay Road North - Requesting that City Extinguish Road and Utility Easement in Outlot A, Orono School Expansion List of Exhibits A - Tom Crosby Letter 5-14-99 B - Plat Appioval Resolution No. 2544 C - Excerpt from 1988 Developer's Agreement D - Plat of Orono School Expansion In 1988 the Council adopted Resolution No. 2544 approving the plat of Orono School Expansion. This plat divided the 51 -acre tract on the east side of Old Crystal Bay Road into 4 large lots plus a road outlot, the purpose being to facilitate the School District's purchase of the entire property. The City required that the private road outlot (Outlot A) be platted to provide access to Lot 2, Block 1, which would other.risc be landlocked if for some reason the entire purchase was not consummated. The City also agreed, via i .’'eloper's Agreement, that if the School District within 11 years acquires title to all 4 lots, the _ would "upon the Developer's petition for combination of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Lots I and 2, Block 2, and Outlot A into a single lot, provide me necessary resolutions, approvals and other reasonable documentation, all in recordable form, to grant approval of such combination, to vacate, abandon and terminate the Easement in Outlot A...". Attorney Tom Crosby on benalf of the School District has submitted a letter to the City Attorney initiating such a petition and suggesting that a quit-claim deed by the City to the School District is the appropriate document for extinguishing the easement rights. Staff and the City Attorney have not yet had the opportunity to reach a conclusion as to the process for this extinguishment. It may require a a public hearing and formal vacation process, or it may require some lesser process. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize staff to commence whatever review and approval process is necessary in order for the City to complete its obligations under the terms of the 1988 Developer's Agreement. couwnii mi^etiNQ JUN 1 4 1999 Cn T Uh omono REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 6/7/99 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Planning Intern Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2169 Michael Renard 1185 Tonkawa Road Variance-Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area:32,648 s.f. or approx. .75 acres Application: On May 24,1999 the City Council approved a variance for Michael Renard (File #2169) to remove an existing shed, its associated hardcover, and replace it with a new shed of the same size. The City Council also approved the new shed to be located on Q.? property as to not be in any side yard setbacks. The applicant proposed to remove an existing shed, its associated hardcover and replace it with a larger shed. The City Council denied the enlargement of the new shed. Staff has drafted a resolution for the City Council to adopt or amend at their June 14,1999 meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L)(2) FILE ^2169 WHEREAS, Michael Renard (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 1185 Tonkawa Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and leg^ly described as follows; Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 853, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 17, 1999, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) to allow 6,144 s.f (26.7%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback area where 6,147 s.f. (26.7%) exists and 5,743 s.f (25%) is allowed to permit construction of a 12'x21' accessory building to replace an existing 12'xl4' shed on the property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2169. The property is located in the LR-IB Zoning District, where 1 acre or 43,560 s.f is the minimum lot area. The property consists of .75 acres or 32,648 s.f Page 1 of 4 .ittA 3. 5. 6. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 17, 1999 and recommended denial on a vote of 4 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: B C. No hardship had been demonstrated. Hardcover amount of 26.7% exceeds allowed amount of 25% in 75-250' lakeshore setback. A larger shed would increase the amount of structural hardcover on the lot. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) to permit 6,060 s.f (26.3%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback where 6,147 s.f (26.7%) exists and 5,743 s.f (25%) is allowed to allow the removal of the existing shed and to replace the shed with a 12'xl4 ’ structure. Approval was subject to the following conditions; 1.The applicant shall remove the concrete sidewalk adjacent to the existing shed within 90 days of receiving a building permit. Page 2 of 4 r 2. 3. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 14, 2000). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this Nth day of June, 1999. ATTEST. Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this Nth day of June, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENISEPIN ) ) ss. ) On this day of j 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) On this day of ^ 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL JUN t 4 W OF ORONO DATE: 6/9/99 ITEM NO, Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2447 Kirt Woodhouse 885 Femdale Road Variances and Conditional Use Permit Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IA 40,629 One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre) square feet (.932 acre) ___ Summary of Request: The City Council granted variances and a conditional use permit for property located at 885 Femdale Road West for remodeling of an existing house located on the property and removing the existing garage and constructing a new four stall garage. The residential portion of the house was to remain on the property and be remodeled. However it has become apparent it is necessary to remove the existing residence from the foundation and construct a new residence. The architect has indicated the existing foundation is adequate to constmet a new stmeture. Please refer to the enclosed site plan and survey which illustrate the existing house is entirely outside of the building pad on the property with much of the stmeture being within 75' of the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. The stmeture being proposed will make use of the existing foundation. It has not been determined if the foundation will require additional stmctural modifications. The applicant is requesting direction from the Council if the proposed project to raise the existing residence leaving the foundation for a new stmeture meets the intent of the approvals granted on January 25, 1999. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To determine if the complete removal of the house meets the intent of the approval granted in the Resolution adopted by the Council in January, or if the applicant shall file a new Land Use Application with the City to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and return to the City Council. Attachments The City Council approved the item on consent at the January 25,1999 meeting Planning Commission Minutes (January 19,1999) Staff Report to the City Council ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 (#7) #2447 KEITH WATERS ASSOC JKIRT WOODHOUSE. 885 FERNDALE ROAD WEST. VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 9:42 •p.m. - 9:47 p.m. Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She stated that the applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for cut and fill to construct a driveway that is located partially through a low area that Is considered to be flood plain. She stated that this is a unique situation because the entire existing residence is located completely out of the allowable building pad. The applicant is proposing to pull the garage off the property line, expand the kitchen and the current office/library. She stated that the applicant Is proposing to reduce hardcover in the 0'-75‘ setback from 17.38% to 16.6% and to reduce hardcover in the 75-250' setback from 35.4% to 30%. Variances are required for side yard setbacks to allow the kitchen addition and relocated garage to be located within the required side yard. A lakeshore setback variance is required for the addition on the west side over the patio because H is located less than 75' from the lakeshore. The proposed kitchen addition is 27' from the lakeshore and also requires a lakeshore variance. The lot Is subject to the 0'-75' setback requirement on two sides. A conditional use permit is also required to change the driveway approach to the garage. She stated that staff is recommending approvai of the application. Kirt Woodhouse and Blake Bichanich were present. Woodhouse stated that he wants to restore the original style of the house. He said they have worked very hard to modernize the house, keep the original character of the house and reduce the hardcover. Bichanich stated that all but one portion of the proposed additions will be over existing hardcover. The garage will be moved off the property line. He reviewed the hardcover that will be removed. Stoddard asked the applicant to summarize the cut and fill plan for the wetland. Bichanich stated it isnl a wetland, just a low portion of the site that Is landscaped and sodded. He said it technically falls below the 931.5 contour line so it is part of the flood plain basin. There were no public comments. Lindquist stated he is in favor of the proposal. Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, a motion to approve Application #2447 for Kirt Woodhouse, 885 Ferndale Road, for Side Yard Setback, Lakeshore Setback, Hardcover Variances and a Conditional Use Permit for CuVFili in a floodplain due to the uniqueness of the lot and the existing topography and the reduction of hardcover. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 13 I Date of Application: 12/16/98 Date Complete: 1/08/98 60 day limit: 03/08/98 Department Approval: Name Liz Van Zomercn Title City Planner REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Januar} 21,1999 ITEM NO.: ^ Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:i!^2447 Blake Bichanich, on behalf of Kirt Woodhouse 885 Feradale Road West Variances and Conditional Use Permit-Resolution Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acre) 40,629 sq. ft. (.932 acres) _____ Application: The applicant is requesting side yard setback, lakeshore setback and hardcover variances in the 0'-75' and 75' -250’ setbacks to allow an existing residence that is located entirely outside of the allowed building envelope to be remodeled. The following variances are required: 1. A side yard variance to allow the garage to be 5' from the east property line and the kitchen 8.96' from the east property line where 30’ is required. 2. A lakeshore setback variance to allow the kitchen addition to be 27' from the lakeshore where the existing house is 27' from the lakeshore and 75* is required. 3. A lakeshore setback variance to allow the office/library addition over the existing patio whic is 42' from the lakeshore where 75' is required. 4. A hardcover variance in the 0'-75' setback to iillow 16.6% hardcover where 17.38% is existing and none is allowed. A hardcover varianc in the 75'-250' setback to allow 30% where 35.4% is existing and 25% is allowed. A conditional use permit is required to change the driveway approach to the garage because 33 cubic yards of fill are required to raise the driveway through an area that is below the floodplain elevation. No net change will occur in volume. Staff Recommendation to Planning Commission: To recommend approval of the requested variances. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: On a 5-0 vote to approve the requested variances. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To amend or adopt the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6; SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (B) AND 2; SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16; AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISIONS 10 (B) AND 11 (A) AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE NO. 2447 WHEREAS, Kirt Woodhouse (hereinafter the "applicant") is owner of the property located at 885 Femdale Road West within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Par 1: Lots 105 and 106, Auditor’s Subdivision Number 184, Hemiepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County. Par 2: All that part of Lot 22, Country Club Estates, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying East of the canal, according to the recorded plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County. (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 19, 1999, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a side yard variance to allow the garage to be 5’ from the east property line and the kitchen 8.96’ from the east property line where 30 ’ is required; a lakeshore setback variance to allow the kitchen addition to be 27’ from the lakeshore where the existing house is 27’ from the lakeshore and 75’ is required; a lakeshore setback variance to allow the office/library addition over the existing patio which is 42 ’ from the lakeshore where 75’ is required; a hardcover variance in the 0-75 ’ setback to allow 16.6% hardcover where 17.38% is existing and none is allowed; and a hardcover variance in the 75-250’ setback to allow 30% where 35.4% is existing and 25% is allowed per Municipal Page 1 of 6 Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6; Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (B) and 2; Section 10.56, Subdivision 16; Section 10.55, Subdivisions 10 (B) and 11 (A) that would allow an existing residence .that is located entirely outside of the allowed building envelope to be remodeled; and a conditional use permit is required for fill in a flood plain for the relocation of a section of the driveway per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. Minnesota: 1. 2. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File ^2447. The property is located in the LR-IA Zoning District, where 2 acres is the minimum lot area. The property consists of .932 acres or 40,629 sq. ft. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 19, 1999 and recommended approval on a vote of 5 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The subject property does not meet the lot area, side yard or lakeshore setback requirements. B. The lot does meet lot width and street yard setback requirements. C. The entire residence is located outside of the allowed building area. D. There is a low area in the street yard that is considered flood plain because it is below the 931.5 elevation. E. The lot is subject to a 75 ’ lakeshore setback on the south and west side of the property. F. The land alteration will result in no net volume change to the flood plain. Page 2 of 6 4.The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for fill in a flood plain for the relocation of a section of the driveway will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a side yard variance to allow the garage to be 5’ from the east property line and the kitchen 8.96 ’ from the east property line where 30 ’ is required; a lakeshore setback variance to allow the kitchen addition to be 27’ from the lakeshore where the existing house is 27’ from the lakeshore and 75’ is required; a lakeshore setback variance to allow the office/library addition over the existing patio which is 42’ from the lakeshore where 75’ is required; a hardcover variance in the 0-75’ setback to allow 16.6% hardcover where 17.38% is existing and none is allowed; and a hardcover variance in the 75-250’ setback to allow 30% where 35.4% is existing and 25% is allowed per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6; Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (B) and 2; Section 10.56, Subdivision 16; Section 10.55, Subdivisions 10 (B) and 11 (A) that would allow an existing residence that is located entirely outside of the allowed building envelope to be remodeled as shown on plans prepared by Keith Waters and Associates in Exhibit A; and grants a conditional use permit for fill in a flood plain for the relocation of a section of the driveway per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19, subject to the following conditions: 1.Applicant to obtain the appropriate permits for filling in the floodplain from the City and Watershed District. Page 3 of 6 i. 2. 3. 4. 5. ATTEST: No additional hardcover variances in the future. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council’s approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (January 25, 2000). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 25th day of January, 1999. Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of January, 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared __________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notarv Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ss. , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared __________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 LOCATE0 ON AUGUST 8. 1998 NCWTTi WIGhT^-WAy Of FCBNfm c FE^NBALE road EF WOOD RAMP ,u^s<£^f ^ c jr / / )i X____(912) — CM surve ^S ne (9JS> C93g- / ifii \ \ Oi - n i7.65 if < / i)|iM NEW = 4,381 Page 6 of 6 980 /A r\ d\ Date of Application: 12/16/98 Completion Date: 1/08/99 60~day limit: i/08/99 TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Liz Van Zoraeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator January 11,1999 #2447 Blake Bichanich, on behalf of Kirt Woodhouse 885 Femdale Road Side Yard Setback, Lakeshore Setback, Hardcover Variances & Conditional Use Permit for Cut/Fill in a Floodplain Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential (2 acres) 40,629 sq. ft. (.932 acres) Exhibits: A Application B Applicant's statement B2 Plat map B3 Property owner's list B4 Adjacent Property Owner's Acknowledgement Form C Existing Survey D Site Plan E Topo map F Hardcover worksheets G Watershed District letter H City Engineer's letter I Cut and Fill Summary 12 Cut and Fill Survey J1 Floor plan J2 Upper Level floor plan K Lakeside elevation L Permit record 82447 Bichanich for Woodhouse 885 Ferndale Road West PC-l/19/99 page~l Date of Application: 12/16/98 Completion Date: 1/08/99 60-day limit: 3/08/99 Application:The applicant is proposing to remodel an existing house 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Raise the floor of the garage 5 ’ to be the same level as laundry/mudroom Move 2 garage bays off the property line and align with the garage 5' off of property line Use space above the garage for bedrooms Enlarge the owner's suite by expanding over the existing main level that is currently 1 story Expand the kitchen at the southeast comer Expand current office/library by 10 x 12 addition Remove bay that is a stairway that won't be needed if garage is changed Remove ramp at the rear of the garage Variances are required for side yard setback to allow the kitchen addition and relocated garage to be located within the required side yard. A lakeshore setback variance is required for the addition on the west side over the patio because it is located less than 75' from the lakeshore. The proposed kitchen addition is 27' from the lakeshore and also requires a lakeshore variance. Variances for hardcover in both the 0'-75* and 75'-250' setback is required; the proposal reduces the amount of total hardcover on the site, however, it exceeds the amount allowed because the existing stmcture is located closer than 75' to the lake where no hardcover is allowed. A conditional use permit is also required to change to driveway approach to the garage. Grading for the driveway will partially fill in the low area. A 1,480 sq. ft. area is proposed to be filled with 33 cubic yards of fill. The applicant is proposing to remove 3.6 inches of soil from the 2,957 sq. ft. area below the 931.5 elevation which will not change the volume of the floodplain. (See Exhibit I). Pertinent Ordinances: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. LR-1A Standards-Section 10.23, Subd. 6 Lakeshore Setback-Section 10.22, Subd. 1, B, & Section 10.56, Subd. 16 Hardcover—Section 10.22, Subd. 2 & Section 10.56, Subd. 16 Flood Fringe Definition—Section 10.55, Subd. A Fill in Floodplain-Section 10.55, Subd. 10, B. and Subd. 11 Land Alteration-Subd. 10.03, Subd. 19 §2447 Bichanichfor Woodhouse 885 Ferndale Road West PC-1/19/99 page-2 \ Date of Application: 12/16/98 Completion Date: 1/08/99 60-day limit: 3/08/99 ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IA District Standards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside Yard 2 acres 200'50’30’75’ and ALS* • Average Lakeshore Setback Subject Property Lot Area and Yards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside 40,629 sq. ft. (.932 acres) 200.65'80 ’ to garage Garage is on property line- proposed to be 5’ off the line 27’ The subject property does not meet the lot area, side yard, or lakeside setback requirement. The lot does meet the lot width and street yard setback requirements. The entire residence was built outside of the allowed building area to locate the house between the lake and the low point on the lot. Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0'-75'26,284 sq. ft. 4,568 sq. ft. (17.38%) None 4,365 sq. ft. (16.6%) 4,365 sq. ft. (16.6%) 75’-250'14,345 sq. ft.5,078 sq. ft. (35.4%) 3,586.25 sq. ft. (25%) 4,307 sq. ft, (30%) 4,307 sq. ft. (30%) U2447 Bichanich for Woodhouse 885 Ferndale Road West PC-1/19/99 page —3 1 i Date of Application: 12/16/98 Completion Date: 1/08/99 60-day limit: 3/08/99 The lot is subject to a greater restrictions for hardcover due to the channel on the west side of the property. A 75' lakeshore setback for hardcover location applies to both the lake and channel side of the property. The existing residence is partially located in the 75' setback from the lake. The proposed addition includes removing hardcover in both setbacks. STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The architect has provided a statement in Exhibit B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION No additions or remodeling can occur on this property without a hardcover variance because the amount of hardcover in the 75' to 250' setback exceeds the 25% limitation. The existing residence is located entirely outside of the building setback area. To locate a new building within the required setback area, the topography would have to be changed because the high point of the lot is where the house is currently located. A low lying area below the 931 elevation is also in the building setback area. Staff recommends approval of the requested variances and conditional use permit due to the uniqueness of the lot and the existing topography and the reduction of hardcover. U2447 Bichanich for Woodhouse 885 Ferndale Road iyest PC-1/19/99 page-4 Application # 0^^"^ Date Received IZ- |(p-^5i Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 Afler-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 5?.^ 5* Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)______________ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired_______________________________________(month/year) I (do) ^do not]) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use ofproperty: residential ___^other (specify)______________________ Zoning District. Qrve, FOmiltQ klfehfyg- .? APPLICANT Name kCit/ TH WArE:g.<k ^ A <>SoC^ • Address: 637^ I fz? Phone (home) Phone (work) City: ElngAJ Zip: OWNER (if ^liflferent than applicant) Name kCig,r \^JbODHbOs^ I !ione (home) Phone (work) Address:^7R-P City: Zip: Estimated Construction Cost $DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ___ Describe request in detail: AvTdXCMir^p 'h>‘^.^C£.iP'Ti!it^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback; ____Lot Width Front ^ Side ^ Hardcover Rear Ix)t Coverage •• ■ Lakesho -fry Cijjl-ffil] !DriiieUtM HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Kg'f', A]~TA///gir) (attach additional sheets if necessary) r ■¥m 12/14/98 KEITH WATERS & ASSOCIATES, Inc. DESIGNERS & BUILDERS 6216 Baker Road Suite 110 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono. MN 55323 (6l2)974-0004 fax (612) 9744)005 www.keithwaters.com License Number - 0001508 statement of Hardship for 885 Ferndale Road Hardships have been created by five existing and unalterable conditions that are unique to this site. The first condition that creates hardship is the location of the existing house on the site. Although the house was originally sited in a way that properly used the site, it does not conform to current zoning regulations. In fact the existing house lies entirely outside of the buildable area allowed by current regulations. Therefore, any modification or addition to the existing house requires a variance for sideyard and lakeshore setbacks. Since the existing home lies outside of the buildable area as defined by current codes and regulations, it creates a “broken application"; i.e. current regulations don’t address or apply to it directly. Therefore staff, planning commission members and City Council will need to apply “common sense" when ruling. Please note that the neighboring home is sited in a similar manner. The second condition that creates a hardship is the existing topography. The house was originally sited on a ridge near the lake in order to take advantage of the view and to assure that high water levels would not endanger the home. Siting the home anywhere else would have meant looking into the ridge instead of at the lake, and would have meant that a portion of the house may have been at or near the floodplain elevation. One result of siting the house on the ridge was that the garage had to be built on the low flat area below the ridge. Entrance to the house from the garage is currently through the unfinished basement. In order to provide better access to the home we intend to raise the floor of the garage by approximately 5’, thereby bringing it nearer to the level of the existing laundry/mudrciom. Part of the back wall of current garage lies on the property line. Staff suggested that we move these 2 bays of the garage off of the property line and align them with the rest of the line. We will be using the space above the garage in order to add required bedrooms to the home without adding any hardcover. Likewise, we plan to enlarge the owner’s suite by expanding over a portion of the existing main level plan that is currently only one story high. Please see the proposed plans. G:\PROJECTS\CURRENT\WOODHOUSEWARIANCE.DOC I The third condition that creates hardship is the fact that the property is surrounded on three sides by water. The result is that even though the site is nearly one acre the area that falls within the 75’ to 250’ zone is only 14,345 square feet. In fact most of the existing site falls within the 0’-75’ zone. The proposed driveway was designed to fall almost entirely with the 75 to 250’ zone, but it still exceeds the allowable 25% hardcover due to the limitations created by being surrounded by water. Please note that we have reduced the overall hardcover on the site by 974 square feet, for a total reduction of 11%. A fourth set of conditions creates functional hardships. The current kitchen is grossly inadequate for a house of this stature and unsuitable for contemporary lifestyles. It’s current location however, is perfect being adjacent to both the dining room and the laundry/mudroom. The only wav the kitchen can be expanded is to fill in the southeast comer of the home. Please note that the existing second story already extends partially into this area by as much as 4 feet . The expansion of the kitchen to the southeast does not encroach any runner on siaeyard or lakeshore setbacks than the existing structure currently does, and therefore does not worsen existing conditions. No hardcover will be added since the area is currently a paved patio. The current office/librarv is inadequately sized in that it does not allow two professional people to work simultaneously in it. We propose to add a 10x12 area onto the e^lStihg office to rerrieqy tneir condition. This expansion does create new hardcover, but we are off setting this by removing a bay of the home which is currently a stairway that will not be required once the garage is reconfigured. We will also be removing an exterior ramp at the rear of the garage. In addition to the above we feel that the historic character of both the home and Femdale Road should be considered when ruling on this application. We do not want to tear the existing home down to build a new home. Our intent is to replace some of the previous phases of remodeling which were inconsistent with original character of the home with forms and features consistent with the original home. This home has contributed to the character of Lake Minnetonka for most of this century, and has the potential to maintain it’s historical presence into the next century if we are allowed to make these needed changes. Sincerely, Blake Bichanich BB/hks O:\PROJECTS\CURRENT\WOODIIOUSE\VARIANCE.doc V d Xil ■ • U V i ^ -^4 0 RUN DATE 12/1^/96 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI^35901 PAGE 10 iATCH 504 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR ZB 02-117-2S 44 0005 000S8 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LAREY EVANS LINDBERG LAREY EVANS LINDBERG 865 FERNDALE RD W WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 44 0006 00865 FERNDALE RD W LAREY EVANS LINDBERG LAREY EVANS LINDBERG 865 FERNDALE RD W WAYZATA NN 55391 38 02-117-23 44 0007 00885 FERNDALE RD W S B I K C OLSON S B OLSON/K CIARDELLI-OLSON 885 FERNDALE RD W WAYZATA NN 55391 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 02-117-23 44 0008 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED S B I K C OLSON S B OLSON/K CIARDELLI-OLSON ^85 FERNDALE RD W kYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 44 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J C t J T BROOKS JOHN C I JOAN T BROOKS 905 FERNDALE ROAD W ORONO MN 55391 38 02-117-23 44 0010 00905 FERNDALE RD W J C 8 J T BROOKS JOHN C 8 JOAN T BROOKS 905 FERNDALE RD W WAYZATA MN 55391 » • 1 { PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR I •' 38 02-117-23 44 0014 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED S B 8 K C OLSON S B OLSON/K CIARDELLI-OLSON 885 FERNDALE RD W WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 44 0015 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 99 02-117-23 44 0023 00692 FERNDALE RD W MARIE H ANKENY ET AL TRSTES MARIE 8 DEWALT ANKENY JR C/0 SARGENT NGNT 601 2ND AVE S STE 4800 MPLS MN 55402 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 99 02-117-23 44 0024 00099 ADDRESS PENDING MARIE H ANKENY ET AL TRSTES MARIE 8 DEWALT ANKENY JR C/0 SARGENT MGMT 601 2ND AVE S STE 4800 MPLS MN 55402 TOTAL BATCH 504 00010 to 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE aj/shi, i . i .'1 Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Form I (we) }jl\RlhV r--. M - [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the located at S jo also referred to as Land Use Application No. —i2—!----• I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbors Date Property Owner Date ***♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦*♦*♦**•***♦**♦♦*♦****************** of »*<»<»<»**<»<«<»************♦♦'******** I (we) [print address][print name(s)] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located ______________• also referred to as Land Use Application No. -------------.. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor s project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. 8 . f c. *r -wp[ 93 ^ ROAD SET RON..Q 5' WOOD RAM C010 oocx V SURVEY UNE 4 10±i SET IRON 9028 A14 9AJ6 C 9AU S85^>5^i 1 i- C08 1C. WALL 18 \ FD IRON if^OSC> a A^8 / building setback / n xo> LINE .................................................... —-^T"/ —-933 t»-0.8S / / /ri STEPS [4.^ fe .WAU PROP! 8.96 \T 9 THIS IE WAa M tsn^^ »99fl Ov '■BUILDING C 44 0 2 EAST Ukp ^^/A/ai NORUt RlCHTiOF.WAy OP FERNfm c rq AO / i I (M2> SCTIRON ’bioo ?" I 5ET V ---------------- FE^N&ALE road 9 AH 48’5B^E XOB X edge or B.:^«CAP£( / 4^,.____ ' .... ^^NOSoVg c :j.. s; ’ I Flood PlC\iV\ DOCK ••••I BUII OlNG^ETBi (333){93-S) ^9J«; \ <M / SUBVE^VUe / / 141.00 S {032} / O iTEPS 22.8 oa5 107.17 sr SET IRON \ V S?3' 17V55 SI ft »- o 17.65 sf ,‘rJr ;1^'58 »||.!E II. Is grONeWALL mw ! 4,381 180 : 3,532 : 980 - (124)LAKf A 4f A a. Topo M € floodlploiin W«t«r 929.6 Wa t*r 929.6 5UBJBX PR0P6CI^I I N \ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ^15^ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE HARDCOVERJCALCULATION WORKSHEET 75-250'250-500'500-1000' A. House Length Width X X X B. C. Garage Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B _ _ B + + X 100 X 100 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______ X Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X ? E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X a a G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ + B X 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. n S.F. ■74 8 S.F. S.F. tom S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. >4 5*^36 S.F.DCS.F.------r- ------ % % ■3E38 • s.f: . S.F. • S.F. S.F. n S.F. _s:4a ..S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. S >.. s,r S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B A B .Vl"''' •'GITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 BARDCOVER ORDINANCE - In 1 975, the Orono City Council adopted an ordinance limiting the percentage of lot area that can be covered with impervious surface ("hardcover") such as roofs, driveways, sidewalks, etc. on properties located within 1,000 feet of a lake. Studies have shown that sediments, oils, and debris carried into the lake from highly urbanized areas have a detrimental impact on the quality of water in the lake. The intent of Orono’s ordinance is to ensure that rainfall run-off will be cleansed by filtering through grassed or vegetated yard areas before entering the lake. Hardcover Zones - Allowed Percentages: 0-75 0% 75-250'25% 250-500'30% 500-1000'35% Hardcover includes: - Roofs - Sidewalks - Paved or gravel driveways - Patios & decks (includes slatted decks) - Tops of retaining walls & rock walls - Decorative landscape areas underlain by plastic sheeting or fabric - Any other surface that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall into the ground INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 1 . Circle which setback zone (0-75', 75-250', etc.) the calculation is for. 2. For each item of hardcover within that zone, enter the length and vddth, and multiply to get square footage (s.f). 3. Add up all the square footages to get total square footage of hardcover. 4. Divide by the total area of property within the zone and multiply by 100 to get percentage of hardcover in the zone. 5.If changes in hardcover are proposed, you should do a "before" worksheet and "after worksheet. If either results in percentages greater than those allowed, contact City staff before proceeding with your project planning! Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 • i HARDCOVER CALCULATTQN WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (^5-25^ 250-500’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ______________ + B _____ + B X 100 » X 100 = PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE House X Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Drivevijv X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B X 100 500-1000' Q3.S.F. S.F. S.F, S.F. Z2.. S.F. 30^ ) S S.F. S.F. 142. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ^07 h S.F. SF. 3^ % % L2.1A A B s.f; . Sen s.f. a S.F.an % Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Improving Quality ofWater, Quality of Life Gray Freshwater Center Hwys.154 19, Navarre Mail; 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MN 55331-9578 Phone:(612)471-0590 Fax: (612) 471-0682 Email: admlnOminnehahacfeek.org Web Site: www.minnehahacreek.org Board of Managers Pamela G. Blixt James Calkins Lance Rsher Moraca Gross Thomas W.LaBounty Thomas Maple, Jr. Malcolm Reid » * ■ ; . . ' December 30, 1998 Elizabeth Van Zommeren City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 - • ^ RE: Review of Proposed Projects Dear Ms. Van Zommeren: h^ari'nff^'if the site plans for proposed projects in Orono which will be on public hearinp in January. Our review shows that several of these projects will need neSnitc from tho Minnehaha Creak Watershed District. The following coramenB applyf #2410. No MeWD stormwater permit is required. There appears to be no wetland Btf^AnDlV 1 '.f than 5W sq^ fe« ~an erosion control permit will be required. *n T ? s' ^ '■«tlt*'''ed around all wetlands. The width of those 71^, ,u>. buffers will de^nd on the surface area of the wetland. If any filling, draining or activity boundaiy a permit will be required for that 3. #2447: Filling or grading below elevation 931.5 will require a floodolain alteration . permit. A cut and fill summaty would be needed to determinv whether or not a net If S to provide BMP’s for stormwater management. ^ als?be'requIrTd involved an erosion control permit will furtlhe^r ques^^^^^ opportunity to comment. Please call me at 471-6282 if you have Sincerely, - ----- ^^im Hatner District Technician MM «ittydid piptr ooniaHng «tiM 3V% pM emuiw uMil. C :\FILES\commems\Orono_l 23098 doc © 6516361311 01/05/99 08:16 g :02/02 N0:520. H?nntroo ffosenr Arutcfifk itnd A$$oc>,*rr^ •/».* ic ^^t.rny*ti%r ^cron Opportunit) tmptoi Pnmiy,*>^ OUO O B'Jnt uw. TC • l»£ * Moiwinl Soi TC • P.ch.iulf Tofiief. nC • GlrnriR Cook. Tf • G ‘..hof.uhl Pf • ir/»y A Oouidon Pt • Pol>rr» W Ciifrn^. Pf .*«a M f* » '••»* ‘ **A r..r nir..r%|% MnwiM A S.mfnr.-i . K,.rn A MnM^n . Hr^r>^n u Mi«.»f.«rif n • Hirh^rrt W Pf • Il4v«firi I nuol • • wofi.'f t k Al A • A Hnnion Pf- • M.cndci I Kfc • ifOAHeid I't • Krnncinp Aivi.-rv*n Pt • p Boifs P£ • ••iflncy P wilMmuin. P# . l S • Poiwii i Ht.umim • A.|i.r\ P n.| • M.fM.iri r .vou. P^ • Aii^n Rick Si^VTildi rc Off trx Pju». Pcichrilrf W Jifi.M .vuf \t « Mm l • M U* tnkrr U l Vt^fbi/rc* w/vwbuMtfSl»uo lurn BONESTROO ROSENE ANOERLIK U J Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & f \J f Associates Engineers & Architects Janimry 5, 1999 Elizabeth VanZomereti City Planncr/Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Bon 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Woodhouse site improvements File No. 139-2447 Dear Liz: We have reviewed the preliminary grading plan for the proposed driveway iind garage improvements at the Kin Woodhouse properly. The site is located at 885 Ferndale Road in the southeast quarter of Section 2. We have the following comments with regard.s to engineering matters, • The overall plans appear acceptable from an engineering standpoint The proposed driveway location will impact the floodplain (elevation 931) located west of the existing driveway. The lirea and volume of the floodplain should be verified prior to construction. The driveway relocation should result in no net lo.ss of floodplain capacity. Wc recommend that the floodplain be mitigated on site to the area and volume that existed prior to the constniciion of the new driveway. Please contact me at (604-4863) if you have any questions fegaiding thi.s matter. ■’/ *ur.s • • .y iruly. tw VNT.XTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. MN 55113 • 612-636 4600 ■ Fax; 612-636-1371 1-8-99 'mm T KEITH WATERS & ASSOCIATES, Inc. DESIGNERS & BUILDERS 6216 Baker Road Suite 110 Eden Prairie, MN SS346 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 (612)974-0004 fax (612) 974-0005 w\\*w.kclthwatcrs.com License Number • 0001508 CUT AND FILL SUMMARY FOR 885 FERNDALE ROAD A total of 658.6 cubic yards of imported fill are required to raise the drive at 885 Ferndale Road. A 1480 square foot area currently lying between the elevations of 930.9 and 931.5 will be filled with 33 cubic yards. However, this reduction of the volume of the floodplain basin will be mitigated on site by removing 33 cubic yards from the remaining area lying below the 931.5 elevation. This will be accomplished by removing 3.6 inches of soil from the remaining 2957 square foot area that lies below the 931.5 elevation. The result is no net change in the volume of the floodplain basin below the 931.5 elevation on the site. Note that the entire area is currently highly landscaped and not part of a wetland. Please see the attached site plan. Sincerely, /ijiOU Blake Bichanich BB/hks O:\PROJECTS\CURRENT\WOODHOUSE\CUT & FILL SUMMARY l-8.99.DOC % O ZL Zil/jrTTr/jVa rA^ W»^ MAiH Lp\;&u I •s Pi > I V. ^».JU ,-. ,. f S 'V h': S t-:v- Bi ■ , -V B : lyrgjjr J; jyi^ -- ii li^ft I .Vl.:; iyt-6r rf:>: !'v.' i > » ii I ;ib^® r—^.............. • ■ •A • •■ ■ .v-r- -Ji:!{• • .. ■ i . T-i- ' 1 ’ ^1 • •'! r^’’' '’?“•'''* f? • --Mi- M KEITH WATERS & ASSOCIATES. iNC.Woodhousc Residence Remodel Designers & Builders (612) 974 0004 6216 Baker Road Suite 110 Eldcii Prairie, KIN 55344 Lkense «1 508 C Copyright 885 Fcmdale Road West Remodel Wayzata, Minnesota 16 December 1998 Permit Wo UlfUS I /♦ PERMIT RECORD Date t-5»6-7/ -y^p-7- ^ ^ f-v5-^/ - 9! n-i'<?■/ •/'JJ-<?-7 Type of Permit :s:ai M» r> \rtfV^iJ/itxt9i '-TKjtLf^ maj-^ Application Date: 3-25>99 Application Complete Date: 4-1-99 60-Day Action Deadline Date: 6-1-99 Prelim. Plat Approved: S-10-99 COUNCIL MEETING JUN 1 4 1999 Cl IY Uh UHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: June 1 1, 1^99 Item No.= 9 Department Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: Zoning Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Item Description: #2480 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Final Plat Approval & Easement Vacation - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Final Plat Approval Resolution for Adoption B - Re-worded Preliminary Plat Approval Resolution No. 4281 C - Final Plat Drawings D - 6-10-99 Crosby Letter: a) Draft Trail Easement Agreement and Survey b) Draft Flowage & Conservation Easement E - Staff Memo 5/7/99 F - Trail Agreement G - May 10 Council Minutes The preliminary plat approval resolution (Resolution No. 4281) has been revised per Council's May 10 approval. Please review the wording of i*ems 1,2 and 8 on page 4 of 6 and advise staff if this wording is different than intended by the Council. The Spring Hill final plat drawings have been revised and they now include the wetland in Outlot B. Applicants will be granting Conservation and Flowage Easements and/or Drainage Easements over all wetlands and drainageways shown on the plat. The trail i<;‘;ue is addres«;ed in the final plat approval resolution in items 8 and 9 on page 3.1 have left this language in italics pending Council review. A trail easement survey has been submitted, along with a draft Trail Easement Agreement, for Council review and discussion. i i r #2480 Spring Hill Golf Club June 11,1999 Page 2 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED 1) Review the Trail Easement Agreement and survey, and advise as to their acceptability; 2) Advise staff whether the revised language of the Preliminary Plat Approval Resolution (ExhibitB) is acceptable; and 3) Adopt or amend the Filial Plat Approval Resolution (Exhibit A) subject to completion of all pending submittals prior to release of the plat for filing by the City Attorney. r”' A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB FILE NO. 2480 under ,he laws Ze regulations owrted by SprinZuSt; ^rrl^alf 47 Rural Residen.S'Zo^^c rr. s- the City has been requested to vacate an existing Flowage and Conservation Easement which as a result of the plat will be entirely encompassed^within a larger Flowage and Conservation Easement to be granted, as noted in Resolution No. 428 1 ; ^ ^ regulations of IcSd^r^^ ‘ ■ « xr" 2. Dedication on the plat of perimeter drainage and utility easements, as well as designation on the plat of drainage v ays and wetlands which shall be the subject of Drainap Easements or Flowage and Conservation Easements providing for limitations on the use of these areas, such easements to be granted to the City 3. Creation of a two outlots on the plat, designated as Outlots A and B. Page 1 of 5 Dedication on the plat of public roads shown as Spring Hill Road, Tamarack Drive, Hunter Drive, East Long Lake Road and County Road No. 6. Granting of an easement for trail purposes along Spring Hill Road. Payment to the City for legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the uiuount of $200.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Spring Hill Golf Club, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1. That certain Flowage and Conservation Easement granted within tax parcel 26-118-23 44 0003 and memorialized in the title of said property as Document No.__________ is hereby vacated. 2. 3. 4. 5. Outlot A is platted as a separate parcel north of County Rciad 6, and may be retained by the Club or may at the Club's discretion be sold to an adjoining property owner for legal combination with the adjoining property, or may be conveyed to the City. Outlot B is platted as a separate parcel south of Spring Hill Road, and may be retained by the Club or may at the Club's discretion be sold to an adjoining property owner for legal combination with the adjoining property, or may be conveyed to the City. Flowage and Conservation Easements and Drainage Easements as appropriate shall be granted over the wetlands, ponds, drainage ways and stormwater facilities shown on the plat, as required in Resolution No. 3902. No additional right-of-way for County Road 6 shall be required by the City, because this plat creates no new building sites and creates no new needs for additional right- of-way. Page 2 of 5 9. 6. The completion of the platting process is subject to approval of the City of Medina. 7. No park dedication fee is required in conjunction with this plat because no new residential building sites are being created. 0. An eaaemenl fur trail purpu:^tis alun^ Spring Hill Road as outliitad in ilw Trail Agreement (Exhibit D of Resolution No. 39C2) shall be granted to the City as a requirement of plat approval but shilJ *»! be required to appear on this plat. The trail easement shall be W in width extending along the south and west property boundaries adjacent to Spring Hill Road. County Road 6 and Tamarack Drive from East Long Lake Road to the City border, except where said easement must be wider to accommodate a trail, in which case the easement shall be defined on a Certificate of survey ^ be supplied for Council approval final to release of the plat for filing. Prior to City release of the plat for filing, all requirements of the Trail Agreement (Exhibit D of Resolution No. 2902) shall be completed. Prior to Qty release of the plat for filing, applicant shall provide evidence of fee ownership of the property in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall provide certified copies of all existing easements affecting the property, and shall meet any other title requirements as may be required by the City Attorney. Applicant shall provide all documents noted in this resolution in a format acceptable to the City Attorney prior to release of the plat for filing. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorders Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before December 14, 1999 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the eascm«'nts, deeds and covenants noted above. The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 14th day of June. 1999. 10. 12. Page 3 of 5 tiin nvsiiTti rtBiit nv^wtiiuj MijiJiWUfW rtitTOC •Scit wiwriWtKiira OiVt rtvftm* riK^il IMTS hX^M rti %mi u •] i«hu m i ■•]^TiTiBiTiK^l rtiKt •nnriRitmRTtTi^ l•T01t [tiin»iwjiiiij[ij rnahiiTti 3. The proposed plat is intended to accomplish the following purposes: 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. a.To result in the dedication of easements over wetlands, drainageways and stormwater management facilities on the property. b. To result in tlie dedication of public roads and drives. c.To create separate taxable outlets from two small unbuildable parcels of land which are currently separated from the main Club property by roads but which are not necessarily intended to remain as part of the Club property. The Outlet status will allow these two unbuildable parcels to be transferred to an adjacent property owner should the Club choose to do so. The northerly portion of Lot 1, Block 1 is within the City of Medina, and therefore City of Medina approval will also be required for this plat. Outlet A is a triangular strip of land north of County Road 6 and west of Hunter Drive, being approximately 0.8 acre in area but being approximately 880' in length adjacent to County Road 6 and averaging less than 40' in width, and therefore is not separately buildable under the standards of the RR-IB Zoning District in which Outlot A is located. Outlet B is a triangular strip of land south of Spring Hill Road and west of East Long Lake Road, being approximately 3.2 acres in area, of wdiich approximately 90% is wetland, and therefore is not separately buildable under the standards of the LR-IA Zoning District in which Outlot B is located. Lot 1 contains the Club property north of County Road 6; Lot 2 contains the Club property south of County Road 6. Thomas D. Johnson, P.E., of Hennepin County Public Works Department has in his letter of April 29, 1999 requested that the applicant's grant and dedicate additional right-of-way for future use for upgrading of County Road 6 and ancillary activities. The Orono Comprehensive Plan defines County Road 6 as Page 2 of 6 9. 10. a 'minor arterial' roadway requiring a minimum right-of-way width of 80’, which already exists. This area of County Road 6 is shown as a bikeway corridor on the Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan. The Council is aware of Hennepin County policies regarding the sharing of right-of way acquisition costs in relation to County requests for right-of-way in conjunction with plats. However, the Council has concluded tliat tlie mere platting of the Club property absent the creation of any new residential lots which would generate users of such a trail, does not appear to meet the nexus and rough proportionality tests for exaction of a dedication from the developer for trail purposes. The City has chosen to noi require a Park Dedication Fee of this developer for this very reason. Further, the request for added right-of-way is not accompanied by a defined County plan for an upgrade of the road. Therefore, the Council concludes that the Hennepin County request for additional right-of-way for County Road 6 must be denied. The property contains a significant number of natural wetlands and drainageways, as well as a number of wetland areas, drainageways, stormwater ponds and similar facilities that have been created or modified as a result of construction of the Spring Hill Golf Course as approved via CUP Resolution No. 3902. All such features are being shown on the plat, and Drainage Easements or Flowage and Conservation Easements as deemed appropriate will be granted by the applicants over all said features. An existing Flowage and Conservation Easement within tax parcel 26-118-23 44 0003 is no longer necessary because a new and expanded easement will be dedicated over it. Therefore, the existing easement within said tax parcel should be vacated per the applicants' request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of Spring Hill Golf Club at 725 Sixth Avenue North per plat drawings by Theodore D. Kemna, a licensed surveyor of Schoell and Madson, Inc., dated April 29, 1999 subject to the following conditions: Page 3 of 6 I L 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Outlet A is platted as a separate parcel north of County Road 6, and may be retained by the Club or may at the Club's discretion be sold to an adjoining property owner for legal combination with the adjoining property, or mav be conveyed to the Citv . Outlet B is platted as a separate parcel south of Spring Hill Road, and may be retained by the Club or may at the Club's discretion be sold to an adjoining property owner for legal combination with the adjoining property, or mav be convey^ to the Citv . On the fmal plat drawings, the wetlands within Outlet B shall be shown. Applicants shall grant Flowage and Conservation Easements and Drainage E^ments as appropriate over the wetlands, ponds, drainageways and stormwater facilities shown on the plat, as required in Resolution No. 3902. The existing Flowage and Conservation Easement within tax parcel 26-118-23 44 0003 will be vacated as part of the fmal plat approval resolution. No additional right-of-way for County Road 6 shall be required by the City. The completion of the platting process is subject to approval of the City of Medina. No Park Dedication Fee is required in conjunction with this plat because no new residential building sites are being created. An easement for trail purposes along Spring Hill Road as outlined in the Trail Agreement (Exhibit D of Resolution No. 3902) shall be granted to the City as a requirement of plat approval but shall not be required to appear on this plat. The trail easement shall he 10' i.^ width extending along the south and west property hnimHaries a(jiacent to Spring '»'.ill Road. Countv Road 6 and Tamarack Drive from F.ast Long L.ake Road to the Citv border, except where said easement must be wider to accommodate a trail, in which case the easement shall be defined on a Certificate of survey to be supplied for Council approval fmal to release of the plat for filing. Page 4 of6 9.Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire within one year of the date of Council approval. May 10, 2000. Should the subdivider fail to complete the filing of the final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. Final Plat Submittals: The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: a.Lot lines platted per plat drawings by Theodore D. Kemna, a licensed surveyor of Schoell and Madson, Inc., dated April 29, 1999. b.Wetlands within Outlet B. c.Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10' wide along the exterior boundaries of property and 5' along the internal lot lines. d. Designation and dedication of drainage easements over wetlands, detention ponds, drainageways, etc. as shown on the plat drawings. Legal documents required: Q.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b.The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. Page 5 of 6 1 I c.Signed and executed Flowage and Conservation Easements to be taken over wetlands, drainageways and detention ponding areas within plat. 3. Fees to be paid: Total due: $200.00 a. Legtd review and filing fees for subdivision and associated documents = $200.00 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of May, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of May, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 6 of 6 "mjOfA p, ^ 4 .VJ \ ¥'i. V l! ^ i li l! ! p t I \ —I T . I ±J__j 1 - fill »Xl J» PO JO*pm*i^ t ,-v § 8 S • ^ •••J a N V 1 1 3 M 'tfmppoAMWp I 4 ( / \ ^■|i \ s W -"C------ / I \ \ il l I5a^- r V. ■s^n |i; V ; |w,,'S {"■■•■^-■'7. ^ ^ 1/ V I • “-I' '^y fj" ** V ’ ^ I * I \1 • ■ • * *!r•* * , i I- t^a ' •*• - • * * 5“--------- '^smt - •* — 1 O *1 iO to ^si S ^q: Ulozo <0 =>□V)*" • * Ul UJz o z=jUJ5 (/} tl •t I I L, •-1 8hf ndl I -J u.O t} UJ X (/) *'.;f ' * / f • % i I f ;s / i f'" -/.A / A*'’V ^5: *'%. •^<*' V - r- / ,‘^/Z '*<5v/ \ Z^90'9ff . 7 0/1/’ r^iHMHJsn itntn ^ //i. V 4' ' ^ #'Sl , iloze V f 3J9ZZ0MS3 J9?.0l^ S \ ^ - \\J \ I CMn L4IJO jocj-^ ^ a N V 1 .1 \3 M (m^ xa \ 9^ w t ioi hw JO 991 Hinas ^ ^ ^r\oi lm)o% V< I ^ L 991 HWOS HO 0H~ ^ I ■ v"-«8 -tfr-^ Q Tv -rfO*.v*»r>- 51M “ Z(^.3*^Z o-;^O .| *ii d •*SiSBg “8 /<? Vs,a: ‘^v* ., V- ' i ' ‘•..S • • jSjSs js8i{ \/ \. -;C - jY ' X/"---- t:w. w.'.xS IjI i \/ « « V .r ( V,v /, //7i k* I i i; ■ z: I>. I I V * . V* i-1 ii ■i .>/. / 'l^ s u jfs r j lAOO JO 9^1 Him. w JO sA n 9*1 JO pA 9*99 JO M9mOO JS u on JO pA n 99 JO ! pA JH 99 JO 9J1 HIM • I -f— ^ ^ ^ 5k \1II ,R -S vvt 2. t' 0/~ 0 N !■?!, .-“.V'A_ \ N fM 1-V b< I Ll-i fr^ 9 c 0 T'f I 9 °--1 ±1-J T~1 ® __i-----1 o ' A 7 __ _____________ If m avou jumoo mO0,Cr,lt^ 9 CN —— -- ____ _______ 4 _ _ '~y. t ' •. ' t \ :: • ^ ■ • I ‘ sr JO p/i ms JHL JO i/t jsjm jnijo Mti atnos K'699 , J .ZP.60M S I 8;? f \ t I “rfvw ----------------^ / 5/*,‘?/M» I. qJ 8 I fe®'" U OK JO PA ms 90 JO PA ms 9U JO 991 Mimom OK JO pA ms 90 JO PA mm 90 JO 991 Htnos \ \ ■yp.mm ^ KS? 8 * .» .*1. ^ 1--»Wi<X I 5»VflfW7~ a !S5 rK *> ^ I A"®.m6.?° /.' .1.^ V ■^vL'Y CA«^Ji?8 \ *j 1/sPn# V s®V«:>N'' -P 3®S*^j5' i E^r v t- \T» \ \ «P I M ^Si «a» L-- • *v; *••••• ‘.r» »•• • i • -J \ / /5r' 6^ii- ^ fjTL-V n f 'I .*^i- r-iJ' .• V*. •...^* f—fiToay IT Lm JO 901 Mt9» 8- J ' U t?=f h''P* !• • ^ ''n' S ^JHlJO J/4 *• 9u JO 9tn mnos—i k y XII F/-*c. Ti^-ifk> I i'p / ' ^JBf / 1. .fif !Slf ^ S. G-, / Ai'’"I t *'< V .If »« ^ hS* I/> I sj * WS ll I s') ” 'fv/S* I ss9y MMomn jo 901 ^uoosJ 9 wH •<* 'm :y.••** %.'.** ^ly ] A: .-t/ ry •V"' '< t ?SCM ?AEG?i 4 EENSON COPY (FED 6. ll’99 I2:24/ST. 15:2S'MO, 4$620-:S27 0 t Faegre & Benson llp 2i00 >^KW|ST CINTIK, 90 SOUTH SIVINTH StKEIT MlMM|A^OLIi» Mihkisota 95402*3901 tlllPMONf il2«9)#.9000 * FACflMILI f12.J9fO029 June 10,1999 COP Y_P"^ 'i)6Cs') THOMA3 M. CHOaiY, flL T&Mby!5r*»jrt M« Thomas J. Barrett Hinshaw & Culbertson 222 S. Ninth St, Ste 3200 Minneapolis, MN 5540? Soriria Hill Golf n..h Dear Tom: Enclosed is a draft of a trail easement agreement for Spring Hill. ^‘oJ^owed the Trail Agreement attached to the Conditional Use Permit as and. I believe, ec^pied by ftSc w much of th. constmction and other definitional t«n,, have been deleted will be a part of h» be*" prepared «rd maintenance .I..O.IU • 1 «8f*ement which will be filed of recordthe following iteme m the Trail Agreement attached to the Conditional Use Pemit: The S20,000 contribution (paragraph 5); and The wetland mitigation credit arrangement (paragraph 7), I am also enclosing a coov of a ftsmn of con^^rv^t property south of Spring Hill Road. • • •• at* *“** •••—••••**••% *W* W*i klAV Mirnmapotu D u Moimm TruJtfmit FROM FAEGRE k BENSON (FRl) 6. H’99 12:24/ST. 12:23/NO. 4862059271 P 3 Thomas J. Barrett June 10,1999 Page 2 Sincerely, Thomas M, Crosby, Jr. TMCrkoecf Enclosures cc: Michael Oaffron Tim Johnson Andy Hunter Ml;S971t7.91 "i FROM FAFCRE k EFNSON (FRI) 6. H’99 12:24/ST. I2:25/NO. 4362053271 ? 4 6/10/99 TRAIL EASEMENT AGREEMENT «nd btwccn S™g *>»____day of Jun.. 1999, by iilsSS-'riXi,v-ounty Recorder m and for Hennepin County. Minnesoe, (the “Spring Hill Property ” ;rant to the City a trail easement for a Meatrian .^I**** *>V 9uit claim to the City a non-exclusivec»wnem lor a peoestnan and cross-country ski trail Duran<u>« r»hA ^ j r i. l»»po« over and acn,„ A* property deJribSo?ESr.^\.!i^2o " Drive from the'interJSonTA crl'!l*rr^‘ “<* ®>«"8 TaniarackHill has beer.----S- *'a • Highway 6 to the maintenance driveway for SoringMvaBu Ojf opring mu and accepted by the City. * * Spring Hilt is mbieet m ** maintenance driveway for «Tfl!lS!erp?^v?d°^^^ Trail Wh7y. oHr^^‘l“mTnmtS"pTn'’^ mi FArC.RZ k S5N20N (FRI) 6 ir09 15:25yNQ. 4365053571 ? 5 free .uo.cncm 01 wildlife in the area of the golf course. * r*«v»n.iK:i:K, t agreement, the City will have the solere^nsibility for maintenance and repair of the Trail. L*. ®*^**<1 to this document will not be used *2^ 2*" motorized vehicles. Such restrictions shall restrict only an Mkar a «J2)^ °l **'® ®P''"'8 Hill Property and will not restrict the City’s trail system Mojau^perties or nght.of.way including, without limitation, the rights-of^ay^joiSng 8.The duration of the easement created herein shall be perpetual, reenM^iv* fc ?*** Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. «.d year fire, “ ** SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB By: CITY OF ORONO By: And by: Its: -2- W FAZGRE k BENSON (FRI) 6. U’99 12:25/ST. 12 :23/NO. 4362033271 ? 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) »s. June, 1999 by^* *’'**“"* wm acknowledged before me this____day of ^ ^ j the -4 Oolf Club, .Minnesota nonptifit con»mion. on bih.lfoftheeo,pomtio r h Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA > ) IS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) June 1995 * ^ *"**™*"“* *«»«'owledged b«for? me this^ y ---------------* tbe ^the and by W%*jf %4A, Minnesota municipal eoiporalion, on behalf of the coiporation. ~ “I Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Faegre A Benson LLP (TMC) 2200 Norwest Center 90 South Seventh Street Mh»n««poli8g MN 55402 Phone: (612)336-3i• III M|;M7M7.01 -3- -itOs % f 1 \ • ' N / > / ^\ / I xJ' -i' IL I /ll */ / • ''.i k' / !*• " Jy •% • ?i' *.• .. . AC ; Ar' ' * ,«• ' • f v ' 1 * * t m i 5!!’.(ill 1 »shM *r|s*«lPl.i;iPi'‘s i % 8 <1 £g:: « o » &R O 09 III O 8 R H a <0o IRooc *?l*§'il t&mfllSli S4 p i i r / •: .’*. \ ^ ¥ (. \' j. 1 4 F5CM FAEGRE 4 EENEON (FED 6. tr 99 12:55/ST. l2:55/m 4562058271 F l>-k 6/10/59 ;ssx^‘;;r-isisr“" "-“'•Fi';-xr rr «i«»M -~iM w i. fc'-c..^ .?s;rji7'sSTM“i!Sr'^“‘’ “• As follows; 1. B. C. Grantof hereby covenants and agrees: -°rhr?T 'rr"**'*<*'" p'«^ “p«^ «bov., or fence*, fireplace*, slaps piers, hardcover or roads of any nature whatsoever oV^v ^ structure or intprovem«.t inconsistent with the natural staU of thc^d No tr^s, shrubs or other vegetation shall be destroyed cut or removed from dte l«,d mtc.pt as mtthoriaed by written consem of Sr»J^ SBS? •»:stiw=sa.rsr=.";j^--" or mateHal as landfill shall be S^rhl trash or garbleshall be placed, dumped or stored upon the land. * ^ No use shall be made of the land except uses, if any which will «dt change or alter the natural condition of the land, and no use which would tend to change the drainage, flood control, water conservation *nd wildlife habitat charactenst,cs shall be mad eofihc land or the water situated thereon E « 1 FSOK FAEGEE i BENSON (FED 6. H’95 !2:55/ST. 12:23/N0.436505E271 P Am sj GMtee may enter upon the land for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be remo’^^ from the land without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substMces, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the land. 2. 1eSrantor hereby grants, gifts, quit claims and rr»nvi*y« to wy^dr^thHa^ P^vilege to trespai with water over Md upon 3. Grantor herein does hereby remiss, release, acquit and forever discharge forever the ^tee and any and alt of its officers and employees of an from any and all claims, demand or causes of action of any kind or nature Whosoever which may arise or accrue by virtue of any flowage or trespass with water within terms of these agreements. land hv in the abovewid by virtue of this indenture or otherwise, except as hereinabove set forth. all encumbranSl^e^r *'*'*'" <iescribed is free and clear of All provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the httrs, successors, representotives, grantees or assigns of the resp«:tive parties hereto. SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) 8$. June. 1999 by^* ^n^n»ng instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Oolf Club, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, on behalf of the corporal of Spring Hill ion. Notary Public Miat71440| •2- fl Application Date: 3-25-99 Application Complete Date: 4-1-99 60-Day Action Deadline Date: 6-1-99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: May 7,1999 Item No.: ^ Department Approval:Administrator Approval: Name; Michael P. Gaffiron Agenda Section: Zoning Title: Senior Pianning Coordinator Item Description: #2480 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Preliminary Plat Easement Vacation - Resolution List of Exhibits A “ Resolution B - 4-29-99 Letter from Hennepin County Transportation Dept. C - Tom Crosby memo re: County right-of-way request. D - Submitted Draft Plat Drawings E - Trail Agreement F - Memo and Exhibits of April 15,1999 i I Easement Dedication Primary Reason for Plat Spring Hill Golf Club was issued a CUP in May 1997. One of the conditions of approval was that Spring Hill would formally grant Conservation and Flowage Easements to the City over the various wetlands and drainageways on the property. It was determined that this could be most effectively done afi££ the approved wetland alterations and drainageway reroutings were completed, to ensure accurate legal descriptions. T>..„ *v>o rV.r.o- nrtfl the comolexitv of their descriotions. Spring Hill has chosen to dedicate these easement areas on a plat, which staff agrees is superior to multiple pages of lengthy legal descriptions. The request also includes the vacation of two pre-existing conservation and flowage easements which will be replaced by larger easements, ’fhe two being vacated are just north of Spring Hill Road and slightly west of the intersection of Spring Hill and East Long Lake Road (see Exhibit G of April 15 memo). • \ #2480 - Spring Hill - Prelim. Plat X ^ ^ 1 ooo i» Afc4jr t j ^ ^ ^ ^ Page 2 Two Outlets Proposed At the time the application was submitted it was determined that the original preliminary plat drawings did not include a portion of the property located south of Spring Hill Road west of East Long Lake Road. This portion is part of a tax parcel located north of Spring Hill Road, and therefore will become part of the plat. This area and one other portion of the site that is north of County Road 6 and just west of Hunter Drive, will be platted as outlots. The submitted plat drawings incorporate Outlot B; however, the wetland in Outlot B has not been shown, and must be shown on the final plat drav,ings. As outlots, these disconnected parcels will be assigned separate PINS numbers, and it will then be possible for the Club to sell them to adjacent property owners should the Club choose to do so. Neither outlot is buildable, and the preliminary and final plat approval resolution will clearly identify this fact. Portion of Lot 1, Block 1 in Medina The northern half of Lot 1, Block 1, is in Medina. The applicant is advised to contact Medina to determine whether separate plat approval action by the Medina City Council is required. Right-of-Way Widths r » . County Road 6 • Because the property abuts County Road 6, Hennepin County was advised of this application and was requested to comment on it. In his letter of April 29 (Exhibit B) Thomas D. Johnson of the Hermepin County Transportation Dept, requests that Spring Hill dedicate additional right-of-wray along County Road 6 to yield a 100 ’ corridor. This request is to "accommodate any future roadway upgrading plus paths, utilities, snow storage, signage, etc." For a majority of the Spring Hill frontage on County Road 6, the existing right-of-way is 80'. This stretch of County Road 6 is designated on the Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan as a "Bikeway", which under the County plan would require a total of 100' of right-of-way where only 80 ’ now exists. Orono ’s 1980 Comprehensive Plan defines County Road 6 as a 'minor arterial’ roadway requiring a minimum right-of-way width of 80 ’. City policy prior to approximately 1980 was to honor such requests, as evidenced by a number of plats that occurred in the 1970 ’s. However, during the 1980's and 1990 ’s the City generally only approved the County’s additional right-of-way requests when they were in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan minimums, or where planned County Road improvements were pending that #2480 - Spring Hill - Prelim. Plat May?, 1999 Page 3 required added right-of-way. The City's apparent policy was to not burden our property owners with 1__cf !?.nd to right-of-ways that weren ’t clearly needed. The 1997 Hennepin County Bikeway Plan established a policy that requires 100% City funding of right-of-way acquisitions when the right-of-way initially requested by the County during plat review was declined by *he City. Otherwise, the right-of-way funding formula is 50% City, 50% County. Orono Subdivision Code Section 11.40 Subd. 2 states: "...when the Comprehensive Municipal Plan or some other agency indicates plans for realignment or widening a road that w'ould require use of some of tne land in ihe suDdivision, the subdivider shall be required to improve and dedicate at his expense such areas for widening or realignment of such roads...." Whether added right-of-way for future bikeways falls within the definition of ” realignment or widening a road" is unclear. It is also unclear whether "future roadway upgrading" as noted by the County, rises to the level of "plans for realignment or widening" the road. What is clear is that Spring Hill is not adding new homes which would contribute to the need for a bike trail, and it is therefore also questionable whether Spring Hill is creating the need for added road right-of-way. Lacking such a connection, and lacking the 'rough proportionality’ required for the dedication, it is questionable whether the taking would be legal (see Crosby’s memo of April 19). The City Council may wish to review its right-of-way policy regarding subdivisions abutting a designated County bikeway route. For now, for the Spring Hill plat, staff is recommending that the request of Hennepin County for added right-of-way, be denied. City Roads The plat drawings submitted do not show the actual pavcd^traveled surface of Spring Hill Road, but the earlier site plans reviewed during the CUP process suggested that the road is more or less centered within its 66 ’+ right-of-way. The dedications for Spring Hill Road, Tamarack Drive and Hunter Drive have been reviewed by the Public Services Director and appear to be appropriate. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this proposed plat and easement vacation/rcdedication at their April 19 meeting and voted 5-0 to recommend approval subject to the conditiions recommended by staff. J #2480 - Spring Hill - Prelim. Plat May 7,1999 Page 4 A rail £a»ciUcut The Trail Agreement (Exhibit E) in Item 1 indicates that Spring Hill will grant to the City an expansion of right-of-way for the trail along Spring Hill Road and Tamarack Drive. These dedications are not shown on the plat, and unless shown as expanded right-of-way, would not be accepted by the County on the plat drawings. The County normally does not allow easements to appear on plats except for right-of-ways or for drainage/wetlands/utilities. Assuming that the City will ultunately come to a final conclusion on the trail locations, the easement for the portions of such trail within Spring Hill's boundaries can be created by either of 2 options: 1. Dedication as additional road right-of-way on the plat; or 2. Granted by metes and bounds description in a separate trail easement document. The attached resolution assumes that option 2 will prevail. If Council wishes to have the right-of- ways of Tamarack and Spring Hill widened within this plat, then the language of the attached preliminary plat approval resolution will have to be revised. ^ ^(frtSX" Staff Recommendation Staff reconunends approval of the proposed plat subject to: 1 l 1.Creation of Outlots A and B as unbuildable property outside the intended Club boundaries; ownership of such outlots may be transferred only to an owner of adjacent land and only when legally combined with that adjacent land. 2.Dedication of rights-of-way for Spring Hill Road, Tamarack Drive and Hunter Drive as shown. 3. Council to provide direction regarding County request for dedication of additional right-of- way along County Road 6 portions of the plat. Staff recommends no additional dedication. 4. On final plat, show the wetland on Outlot B. 5.Execution of a conservation and flowage easement over all wetlands shown on the plat, and vacation of the existing easements at the south end of the site. t %■ r I 5 . "I f- #2480 - Spring HUl - Prelim. Plat May 7,1999 Page 5 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Reach a conclusion as to whether the County request for added right-of-way will be honored; and Reach a conclusion on whether the proposed trails along Tamarack and Spring Hill Road should be incorporated in this platting as widened right-of-ways or accepted by metes and bounds descriotions in a separate easement document. Adopt the attached Preliminary Plat Approval resolution per staff recommendation; direct staff to revise the resolution if the County right-of-way request is approved or if the widened right-of-way method tor trail easement is chosen. * : FROM FAEGRE & BENSON (MON) 4.19'90 12:33/ST. 12;5l/K0.436505SS4o P 5 EXHIBITD FSSOLtrnON NO. 3902 r TRAIL AGREEMENT CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA THIS AGREEMENT, malt tni entered into Ihia day of — . 1997, by md bebmen the City of Orono, a municipal coiporatioa organized unde^h^ laws of ^ State of Minnesota Q^ereinaiter called *City*') and Spring Hill Golf Club, a Minnesota nonpro5t eorpexadon, itsheizs, auceesaors and assigns, (hereinafter called "Spring Hill") . TVITNESSEIH: WHEWAS, Spring Hill has made q)plication to the City Council for approval of the construction and operation of a golf course; and YiHER£AS»tbe City Council has granted ^iproval for such development on the condition dist Spring Ifill will pro^de easements and construction activities and centralize certain costs for the City’s trail system on the perimeter of the Spring Hill property. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and of one dollar and other good valuable consideration, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Spring!^ will deed to die City for stominal consideration an easement to extend the Cit/s right-of-way qiproximately ten feet north of its existing right-of-way along Spring ICU Road ftom East L^ lake Road to County Road 6, and ten feet east of the right-of-way of Tamaraclc Drive fiom County Road 6 to the City line. In some cases, more than ten feet will be required. The predse e)q)anrion of the right-of way will vary deperxling on the topography and may in some cases exceed of be leas than ten feet. Any modification of the ten feet easement referred to in this paragr^h is subject to mutual agreement of the City and Spring Hill. 2. Orono will design a trail system within the City right-of-way, as expanded, which trail system to the extent it b on the ri^t-of-way donated by Spring HIU will be subject to the reasonable approval of Spring Hill. It is the intent of the parties that the proposed trail provide a scenic off-Toad pedestrian and cross-country sict trail vritb minimum impact i^n Golf Club and without hazardous conditions for the trail users. Page 1 of3 FROM FAEGRE BENilON (MON) 4. 19’99 12:S4/ST. I2:3l/N0. 436205834$ P 6 • • 3. SpringHill wQl, at its construct A tndl along Spring Hill Road west of Eajrt Long Lalco Road and north on Tamarack to Wetland Number 12, with the following characteristios: (a) The trail will be for pedestrian and cross-ccvmtty skiing use and will not be designed for bicycles or snowmobiles. (b) The tmi! clearing will be approdmately four feet wide. (c) Wood chips, if requested by die City, will be provided as tlte traveled sui&ce. 4. The trail on TamarackDrive coromencing at Wetland Number iZ and north will be siibjcct to future design and construction. 5. In addition to the construction undertaking above. Spring Hill wiU contribute up to $20,000 towards trail construction in the vicinity of the golf course. d.. ... City staff and engineers will participate in the layout and engmeerjuig of the trail, at the.Ci^'s expense. City will be re^nsible for obtaining all permits required for the traU. • # 7. Spring Hill agrees to transfer to the Chy two-diirds of the excess wetland mhigatiQa credits resulting fiom construction of the golf course in Orono. The credits will be utilised for trail system and, to the.extent any lemain, will be available to the City of Orono. The rexnainiiig one- third wiU be retained by Spring Hill for possible future modiffcatioQs of the golf course, sulyect to appHcahla lav^ and government approvals. Spring KtU agreea not to sell or otherwise transfer daese cr^ts from the golf course site. 8. Spring HUi niay construct a! its expense, a rustic ^lit rail fence between the trail and the golf course on those locations where, for safety and separation reasons, planting and berming is not feasible. Spring Hill will not construct any fence which will prevent the free movement of wild life in the area of the golf course. 9. The City will have re^nsibility for maintenance and repair of the trail after initial eonstruetion. ^ a 10. Spring Hill will not ba Obligated to complete construction oftiie trail until completion of the golf course. The parties aoUcipate that the trail will be ready for use concurrently with the opening of the golf course. The final design of the trail system will be determined after the final grading plans have been deteimlned and alter the rough grading for the golf course has been complete. 11* The restrictions on the Orono Trail set forth herein shall restxwct only, that portion of die trail on the right'Of-wBy donated by Spring Hill and shall not restrict the City ’s trail on its Page 2 of 3 • FROM FAEGRE k EENSON (MON) 4.19 ’99 12:34/ST. 12:3l/NO. 4362058343 P 7 oQyet properties or rigbts-of*wty. inelucfiog« without limitition. the rights^f>wBy adjoining Spring Hm.. IN WITNESS WHEItEOF» this agreement has ben executed by the duly authorized ofiBcen of each of the foiegoing. A Attat i v<s •• I. I rrrv nt? ottovn SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB Its rneS/cUu tr ^ " • • • « •••• • • # Page 3 of3 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 10,1999 c:; (US) #2480 SPRING HELL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - PRELIMINARY PLAT - RESOLUTION NO. 4281. • * “ ♦ • * Tim Johnson and Thomas Crosby were present. ^ TJT rt J O f TJ1 H 'P 11 C 1 OVJCULllVi/li ULlW Owuxi, MA.S0 •Jh<UkV» ww*... w »• *.. ..•••. •. Conditional Use Permit in 1997 and one of the conditions of approval was that they formally grant Conservation and Flowage Easements to the City over the various wetlands and drainageways on the property. He said there were also some new wetlands that were created and some ponding areas that were created from wetlands. Due to the number of wetlands and drainageways, and the complexity of their descriptions, Spring Hill has chosen to dedicate these easement arca^ on a plat. The ic^uest also uicludcs tlio Vacation of two pre-existing conservation and flowage easements which will be replaced by larger easements. Two outlots will be created that are not buildable, but could be sold to a neighboring property. A portion of the property is in Medina and the applicant has been advised to contact Medina regarding that portion of the property. Gaffron said there is an issue regarding the width of right-of-way for County Road 6. Hennepin County has requested an expansion of the County Road 6 right- of-way. The majority of the right-of-way for County Road 6 is 80’ which is the minimum requirement in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The County is requesting that Spring Hill dedicate addiiionai righi-of-way to acconiniodalc any fuuirc roadway upgrading plus paths, utilities, snow storage, signage, etc. Hennepin County has designated this portion of County Road 6 as part of their bike^vay system. The bikeway plan indicates to Cities that when there is a subdivision or platting process, the County would like to have additional right-of-ways granted. When the City complies with that, then the County will share 50/50 for any future acquisition costs. But if, at the time of platting, the County finds that the City refuses to require the additional right-of-way, then if it’s ever needed and the County has to acquire it, they want to charge the City 100%. Gaffron said this subdivision is unique because it is not creating any new buildable lots, it’s merely platting in order to create some easements for drainage purposes. Because of tliat there is no real connection between the need for additional right-of-way and anything that is being created by this development. He thinks there is a strong case to say that there is no basis for the City to require the additional right-of-way. Spring Hill has developed their course in a manner where they would suffer by having to give up ten feet of right-of-way along County Road 6. Jabbour asked if the County is asking for right-of-way all along County Road 6. Gaffron said the County is asking for the right-of-way along the entire length of County Road 6. Jabbour asked if Gaffron’s position is the same for the whole Icugui of County Road 6. Page 7 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 10,1999 {US Spring Hill Golf Club, continued) Gaf&on said his position is that for the entire length of County Road 6, 80 feet is adequate and that is the case for Spring Hill as well as any other areas along County Road 6 that might develop under the City ’s 1980 Comprehensive Plan which says that 80’ is the standard. Gaffron said that prior to 1980, the City did honor the County’s requests. When the 1980 plan was put in place and since then, the City has refused to grant the County the added rights-of- way when they are asking for more than the City ’s Comprehensive Plan recommends. Part of the reasoning is that if the County wants additional right-of-way, they should pay the residents for It. He said that staff’s recommendation is to approve the plat as it is proposed. Gaffron said the Trail Agreement indicates that Spring Hill will grant to the City an expansion of the right-of-way for the trail along Spring Hill Road and Tamarack Drive. The trail easement is not shown on the plat. Gaffron said staff recommends approval of the plat as it is proposed subject to the conditions stated in the staff report. Crosby said he would prefer the bike trail tc* be under a separate agreement because if the City and Spring Hill decide to change an>1liing regarding the bike trail, it would be easier to change an agreement than it would be to cfrmge a plat. He thinks the issues regarding the trail have been agreed upon except for the part of the trail on the north side of County Road 6 by the maintenance facility. Jabbour said it is a difficult area for developing a trail. He asked if the agreement should be ma.'e a part of the final plat approval. Crosby said a survey needs to be done. He iaid they could give the City an agreement subject to undertaking the survey. He mentioned thst Spring Hill also owns the property south of Outlot B. It was not included in the plat because it is located in a different section. It was more difficult for the surveyors to pick it ui> because the section line is the southern line of the outlot. It will be subject to the same conservation easement as the outlot, but there will be a separate tax identification number. He sai 1 they would like to obtain final plat approval in two weeks. Jabbour said if the City grants preliminary approval, they must give final approval, so all the conditions must be stated at this time. Barrett said that the conditions the Council places on the preliminary plat approval are the only ones that can be imposed for final plat approval. Flint said he did not object to an agreement for the bike trail versus having it on the plat, but he is concerned that the location of the trail has not been determined. He suggested that in the difficult area of the trail located at intersection of Tamarack and County Road 6, the tredl be designated as 10 feet inside the boundary of the property and that would give flexibility as to whether it was located inside the boundary of the property or on the County right-of-way. Pages ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 10,1999 (#5 Spring HiU Golf Club, continued) Crosby said the problem is the County property probably goes to the base of the berm. • • • Flint said the alternative when the trail was looked at a year ago was to put the trail on top of the berm. He was advised at that time that the trail could be put on the side of the berm with a terrace, mat s the omy piace liie uaii cmi be iucaicu mucod ilio utco uiw from tlic top of the berm. Kelley wants to know where the trail will be located before final plat approval. He wants the location of the trail to be a condition of approval. Jabbour said the concern is that Spring Hill will choose to put the trail on the County property. Flint said the problem is if the trail is put on the County right-of-way, the County will not act within two weeks. Kelley asked if the City wants the trail on County right-of-way. Flint said that is why he suggested putting it on the ten feet inside the boundary of the property. Jabbour said the City will probably end up getting an easement and be guaranteed the trail will Ha Hniit nn the applicant’s property and then if the aoolicant secures a way to get the trail built on the County property, they City could accept it. Kelley suggested building the retaining wall on the berm and putting the trail ten feet into the berm. Johnson said he understands the City has agreed to look into getting the trail located on County right-of-way. Gappa said he will be meeting with the County tomorrow, but the County will probably not give him an answer immediately. Jabbour asked if Crosby had a problem with the Council approving the application with a condition that there will be an easement given to the City ten feet into the property and there will be a trail constructed and the City and the applicant will work diligently to make sure that it works on the County’s side. Page 9 I 1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 10,1999 (#5 Spring HUl Golf Club, continued) Crosby said the problem with a 10 ’ foot easement is that it would require a six to eight-foot retaining wall which >vould be very expensive, He asked if this was the only problem with Ae trail. ■ . Flint said there is one other spot where there is a problem with the slope. McDermott said that south of County Road 6 where Spring Hill and 6 meet, they talked about moving the trail a couple of feet inside the split rail fence. Flint said he thought there was spot where the trail needs a little work because it’s too steep. McDermott said that doesn’t have anything to do with the right-of-way, it has more to do with the trail design. Jabbour asked if the public has the right to go beyond the fence and walk on Spring Hill’s land. Flint said that the fence is on the City ’s right-of-way. They will leave the fence on the City ’s right-of-way, but there will be two openings in the fence for access to tlie trail. Jabbour said he doesn’t want citizens to feel like they are trespassing on Spring Hill’s property. McDermott said they talked about putting up a sign indicating this is a walking trail. He said there will be an obvious opening and there will be another fence on the golf course side so it won’t look like you can wander onto the course. Crosby asked if the mayor could appoint one of the Council members to ^^'ork wth them on a solution for the trail. He asked if it is necessary to have ten feet for the easement. Flini said the agreement says ten feet It could be more or less than ten feet. Crosby said they would like to have the ability to negotiate the ten feet because if they put in a retaining wall, it will be substantially more difficult to do ten feet than six or eight feet because of the grade. Jabbour suggested approving the application subject to those conditions and then agree on the number of feet before final approval. Crosby said he would accept a preliminary approval subject to a satisfactory trail agreement including specifically the area south of the maintenance facility. Page 10 / / ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 10,1999 QtS Spring Hill Golf Club, continued) Flint said the easement would be ten feet, not necessarily the trail. Crosby said he understands that, but if an easement is given without an understanding, the City could come back and say they want a len-foot trail. Flint said that is not the City’s intent. Flint said they should discuss who is going to pay for that portion of the trail Jabbour said he understood the applicant would provide the trail and build it. He said the only issue they were having a tough time with is how to cross the wetland. He understands there is a $20,000 gift to the City from Spring Hill that may be used in the future for pontoons or a bridge to cross the wetland. Flint said he understands that the trail is to be built by Spring Hill and the City will maintain it. Crosby said that is correct. He understands from Tim Johnson that the question was raised as to whether or not a portion of the $20,000 could be used for the Highway 6 problem. Jabbour said that was not his imderstanding. Crosby said the $20,000 came from the problem of trying to bridge me wetland. Jabbour said the City would like to reserve that for the future. McDermott asked if the City is getting an easement north of the wetland. He said he knows there is no trail at this point, but he would like to know if the City is getting an easement. Jabbour said he thought the City was getting an easement up to Medina. McDermott said that there needs to be a survey for the easement. Jabbour said the applicant is proposing to give the City a contractual agreement that is described by a surveyor for a trail up to the Medina border. Crosby said that is correct. Flint said he is inclined to agree with staff regarding the additional right-of-way for Heiuiepin County along County Road 6. He asked for the City Attorney’s opinion regarding the width of County Road 6. Page 11 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 10, 1999 (#5 Spring HUl Golf Club, continued) Barrett said this is an appUcation for subdivision in Ueu of a proper^ description gr^g e^Sln^He said there are.no lots being created for development. The on^y sees is raised in the staff report which is that the County lakes the posiUon that if C'fr refces to gilt the requested easement, then there is a 100% «* Sraty to^ all of die acquisition or upgrade costs. Barrett smd the City can tell ^ Coun^that'^tUs subdivision is different, it is a device for descnpuon and not a development project. Z'ZiZ w a U^r citing the difference in the project because the entire project could have been done without platting. Kelley said he agreed with Flint. Jabbour directed staff to send a letter to the County storing the City's position. Flint asked if that will cover the triangular piece as well as the piece in the next section it Gaffron said that is correct He explained the reasoning for not including the lot to the south in the plat. St^^ot"‘HetdTrgue “ would not agree because it was a common tax .cduuds have He- P^. squires a conservation easement on the wetlands on the property south of Spnng Hill Roa . Kelley asked if they could put in a dock. Page 12 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 10,1999 (ffS Spring HiU Golf Club, continued) GaJtiron said that the conservation and flowage easement has loiisuage that does not allovv any structures. . . Jabbour asked what the club plans to do with those two pieces of land in tlie future Crosby said the applicant does not know what it plans to do with that property. Flint asked if the applicant can convey the property away. Crosby said it could be conveyed away. Jabbour said it could only be conveyed to an adjacent property owner. Gaffron said that is correct, but it could be changed. Flint asked if there will be language that says they can convey it to the adjacent property owner or to the City. Gaffron said that language can be added. He said language should be added to item 2 on page 4 of the resolution that states the property can be transferred to the City. Flint agreed. Gaffron asked if the Council members agreed with the wording of item 8 on page 4 regarding the easement for trail purposes. Flint said the City should require a separate survey for the trail. Gaffron said language can be added that states “and as defined by a survey to be supplied prior to final plat approval.” Crosby asked how many places along the trail it would go in further than ten feet. The easement could be granted within the ten feet except to describe those portions where it goes into the golf course. Flint agreed that the area in the north is the problem area. He said it’s okay if it’s a ten-foot easement along the whole trail and only survey it in the area where the trail goes back significantly. Page 13 X ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 10,1999 (US Spring Hill Golf Club, continued) Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, a motion to approve Resolution No. 4281 Granting Preliminary Approval for the Platting of Property Located at 725 Sixth Avenue North, File No. 2480, as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#6) #2481 SPRING HELL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - REZONING - ORDINANCE NO. 187,2ND SERIES Tim Johnson and Thomas Crosby were present. Gaffron presented the staff report. He said the Spring Hill Golf Club property is zoned RR- lB-1. Since the property will no longer contain facilities for a “study and research center”, pnnnrti ronuirpH in Ponrtitinn 1 nf Rcsolutiou No. 3902. that SorinB Hill Golf Club flnniv for rezoning of this property back to RR-IB. Flint moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 187, 2nd Series, an Ordinance Amending the Municipal Code of Orono by Listing the Legal Description of Certain Properties in the City as Rezoned from RR-lB-1 to RRIB. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#7) #2482 SPRING HELL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - CUP FOR GUEST HOUSE - RESOLUTION NO. 4282. Tim Johnson and Thomas Crosby were present. Gaffron presented the staff report. He said that at the time the Conditional Use Permit application for the Golf Club was approved, it was staffs impression that the existing caretaker house wets going to be removed. The intent is to maintain the caretaker house, the garage and possibly the shed next to it for an employee and as a potential guest house. The house has been connected to a sewer system. The guest house conditional use permit standards are met. Jabbour asked if the house could be expanded. Gaffron said that since it is an existing building under a conditional use, an addition or a change would require Council approval. Crosby stated that the house is a one bedroom farm house that cannot be expanded without affecting the golf course. Page 14 Date Application Submitted: 4-14-99 Date Application Considered Substantially Complete: 4-30*99 60-Day Review Period Ends: 6-29-99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING JUN 1 4 1999 Ull Y Of UttONO Date: June 11,1999 Item No.: ^ Department Approval: i^ministrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffrol)/ Ov Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2484 Woodhill Country Club, 200 Woodhill Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Attached as Exhibit A is a revised draft resolution granting a CUP to Woodhill Country Club for driveway access to Woodhill Avenue. This revised draft incorporates a number of changes from the initial draft provided to Council prior to the May 24 meeting. The revisions are highlighted in Exhibit B in underline/strikcout format for you to compare the two drafts. The draft incorporates certain changes requested by the Club, but not necessarily all the changes requested by the Club. City Attorney Tom Barrett has assisted staff in the redrafting of this Resolution to as accurately as possible reflect the Council's intent and action at the May 11 meeting. \ . COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Review the attached resolution and either adopt or amend as Council determines is appropriate. 2484rcsJA A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB FOR A DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO WOODHILL AVENUE FILE #2484 WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning and other regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, Woodhill Country Club (hereinafter "applicant" or "the Club"), a Minnesota non-profit corporation, is owner of the property addressed as 200 Woodhill Road, a portion of which is located within the City of Orono, such portion being legally described in Exhibit A attached and referred to hereinafter as "the Property"; and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City for an amendment of its 1968 conditional use permit (CUP) per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28 Subd. 3, to: a) acknowledge certain basic rights of access to Woodhill Avenue; and b) impose certain new restrictions and conditions on Woodhill's access to Woodhill Avenue; and WHEREAS, litigation concerning the access is pending, and this application has been tendered by the applicant in an effort to resolve the litigation; and WHEREAS, on May 11,1999 after due published and mailed notice, the City Council held a public hearing on this application and received information and comments from the applicant and applicant's consultants, fi^om the City staff and the City's consultants, and from the public including residents and representatives of the Woodhill Avenue neighborhood. Page 1 of 8 1f kt NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as zoning file No. 2484. The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. Within the RR-IB zoning district, golf courses and country clubs are a permitted use via conditional use permit (CUP). Woodhill Country Club operates under a CUP granted by the City on September 13,1968. The text of the 1968 CUP does not expressly address (either by way of limitation or authorization) the use or location of any driveway on or access to the Property. Subsequent CUP approvals have been granted to Woodhill Country Club for construction of tennis courts in 1973, construction of a maintenance facility in 1988, and construction of a pumphouse in 1998. The western driveway of the Woodhill Country Club abuts the platted right-of-way of Woodhill Avenue. The Club's main entrance is on Woodhill Road. Woodhill Road serves an existing neighborhood of eleven private homes. Traffic from Woodhill Road crosses the railroad tracks and enters onto County Road 15. Development of the Woodhill Ridge subdivision occurred in the late 1980's and the Woodhill Avenue access was not used for regular vehicular use during or since that development occurred. The traffic levels on County Road 1 5 make ''ccess to the Club difficult, particularly from the west and north, due to the need to make left turns across heavy traffic onto County Road 15 and from County Road 15 to Woodhill Road. Page 2 of 8 10. The Club wishes to use Woodhill Avenue as a secondary access for vehicular traffic to the Property. The use of Woodhill Avenue as an access for regular vehicular traffic to Woodhill Country Club will be a change from the traffic pattern in place since 1980 and may change the current character of Woodhill Avenue, which has functioned as a dead-end street since 1980. 11. The City Council finds that the Club’s use of Woodhill Avenue as an access road may create certain negative impacts to the existing Woodhill Avenue neighborhood unless some limitations on the Club's use of the access are established. The City Council desires to place limitations on Woodhill Country Club's use of Woodhill Avenue as a secondary access in order to ensure that the health, safety and welfare of the existing residential neighborhoods served by Woodhill Avenue is adequately protected, and that any negative impacts which might be created by the Club's use of Woodhill Avenue are minimized or avoided. 12. The City Council finds that granting this Conditional Use Permit to allow use of Woodhill Avenue as a secondary access on the terms set forth in this permit will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air, nor pose other dangers to neighboring properties, nor will it be materially injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and that the proposed location of the use of the access will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the City Council of Orono, Mmnesota hereby grants to Woodhill Country Club an amendment to its 1968 Conditional Use Permit to allow limited access via Woodhill Avenue subject to the following conditions: 1. The right of the Club to the reasonable use of the Woodhill Avenue access is hereby acknowledged and granted, subject to the the right and authority of the City to place restrictions on the use of the access as necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare, and subject to the conditions of this permit. The City does not reserve the right to completely close the Woodhill Avenue a ccess under the CUP process. Page 3 of 8 2. 3. The Club shall pave the road (to be hereinafter referred to as "the Woodhill Avenue access") within the dedicated right-of-way of Woodhill Avenue extending from the easterly end of the currently paved portion of Woodhill Avenue, to the easterly end of the dedicated right-of- way. The Club may improve the gravel driveway within the Property to connect the Club ’s interior driveway system to the Woodhill Avenue access. An after-the-fact staff-administered land alteration permit as well as an after-tJie-fact permit from the Public Services Director for work within the right-of-way shall be issued with the CUP for such work, prior to recommencement of construction on the Woodhill Avenue access. The Club shall install a gate across its private driveway within 30 feet of the western boundary of the Property, which gate shall be locked at all times except when used as follows: A. B. C. D. E. Use of the Woodhill Avenue access by emergency vehicles (police, fire, ambulance and utility). Use of the Woodhill Avenue access for transporting Club tractors to and from Long Lake for repair. Use of the Woodhill Avenue access for general access to the Property if the Woodhill Road access to County Road 15 is temporarily blocked (subject to reasonable notification to the City and affected neighbors), but only during the period of such temporary blockage. Use of the Woodhill Avenue access under the terms of that certain Easement Agreement, dated October 5, 1987 between the City, the Club, and MSM, which benefits one residential lot if County Road 15 access is blocked. Use of the Woodhill Avenue access as an entrance only (i.e. one way, from west to east) for private passenger vehicles between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. during those days that the Club is open. Page 4 of 8 4. The following uses are not approved at this time, and would require further review and an amendment to this CUP: 5. 6. 7. A.Conversion of the Woodhill Avenue access into the main entrance to the Club on a permanent basis. B.The authorized use of the Woodhill Avenue access as an entrance or exit by delivery, taxi, service, or other commercial vehicles. C. Use of the Woodhill Avenue access as an entrance or exit by the general public. D. Use of the Woodhill Avenue access at time periods other than as provided for in Condition 3 above. E. Expansion of the Club’s westerly interior driveway betw-een the maintenance building and the Woodhill Avenue access. r A • of flCPltinn Of dirPOtlOTV^lA W AWiAV ^1* I I II I I I V t. . . . . i Vi .1 -------------- _ » ^ concerning the Club. City staff shall monitor use of the Woodhill Avenue access during its first season of operation and shall report to the Council any problems or concerns that are encountered. The City may periodically meter the amount of traffic using the Woodhill Avenue access. In addition to the review provided for in Orono Zoning Code Section 10.09, Subdivision 11, the Council reserves the right, subject to Condition 1, to review and amend the terms and conditions of this permit pursuant to Section 10.09, Subdivision 6B. The City may review and amend the conditions of this CUP after the first golf season of operation under this CUP, or if the peak daily traffic count exceeds 100 trips per day at any time. The City will not review or amend the basic right of access as set forth in Condition 1 of this Conditional Use Permit. The Club shall make or be responsible for the following improvements in conjuR'. with its construction of the Woodhill Avenue access: Page 5 of 8 ■I 8. A. Installation of eastbound and northbound stop signs at the intersection of the public portions of Woodhill Avenue and the private road serving the Woodhill Ridge development (See Exhibit B). B. Installation of eastbound "10 MPH" speed limit signs within the Woodhill Avenue access. C. Installation of westbound "Do Not Enter" signage at the Club's interior driveway near the maintenance building. D. Installation of speed bumps along Woodhill Avenue as requested by the Public Services Director. E. Paving of the Woodhill Avenue access from the eastern end of the currently paved roadway to the Club property line. F. Removal of vegetation within the right-of-way of Woodhill Avenue or Orono Orchard Road that may impede adequate sight distance, as requested by the Public Ser\ ices Director subject to notification of the property owner abutting the vegetation to be removed. G. Installation of stormwater facilities and other construction per Coffin & Gronberg engineering plan dated April 23,1999 subject to provision of any other information requested by the City Engineer per his letter dated April 30, 1999. If all access from the Club to County Road 15 is permanently blocked as a result of either County Road 15 alteration or improvement, or as a result of closure of the Woodhill Road access by the owner of the railroad right-of-way, the City recognizes the Club’s right of reasonable access, but reserves the right and authority to determine via the conditional use permit process whether such permanent access should be provided by allowing a full access to Woodhill Avenue, or via some other method or location, and what conditions must be imposed on that access to protect the health, safety and welfare of all citizens in the area and the users of the roads, including Woodhill members, guests and employees. Page 6 of 8 9. Authorities granted by this conditional use permit run with the property not with the applicant. 10. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code per Section 10,09, Subdivision 12 and Section 10.99, and may terminate any authority granted herein, after review by the Council. 11. The undersigned applicant has read and understood the terms of this resolution, hereby agrees to Conditions 1-10, and on behalf of itself, its heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the Property. 12. The applicant asserts that its acknowledgement of this Resolution and agreement to its conditions does not waive and is without prejudice to applicants claim of right to use the Woodhill Avenue access without limitation and without amendment of its 1968 CUP, a claim which the City denies. 13. The City will co: ^ent to a dismissal without prejudice of the litigation concerning the access. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk APPLICANT ACCEPTANCE: Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Authorized Representative of Woodhill Country Club Page 7 of 8 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COLTNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of June, 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) On this day of , 1999 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 8 of 8 S 2484rei.6 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB FOR A DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO WOODHILL AVENUE FILE ^2484 WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning and other regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, Woodhill Country Club (hereinafter "applicant" or "the Club"), a Minnesota non-profit corporation, is owner of the property addressed as 200 Woodhill Road, a portion of which is located within the City of Orono, such portion being legally described in Exhibit A attached and referred to hereinafter as "the pEroperty"; and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City for an amendment of its 1968 conditional use permit (CUP) per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28 Subd. 3, to: a) acknowledge certain basic rights of access to Woodhill Avenue; and b) impose certain new restrictions and conditions on Woodhill's access to Woodhill Avenue; an<:’ WHEREAS, litigation concerning the access is pending, and this application has been tendered by the applicant in an effort to resolve the litigation; and WHEREAS, on May 11,1999 after due published and mailed notice, the City Council held a public hearing on this application and received information and conunents from the applicant and applicant's consultants, from the City staff and the City's consultants, and from the public including residents and representatives of the Woodhill Avenue neighborhood. Page 1 of9 II 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 1. 9 3. 4. 6L FINDINGS This application was reviewed as zoning file No. 2484. The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. Within the RR-IB zoning dislrict, golf courses and country clubs are a permitted use via conditional use permit (CUP). Woodhill Country Club operates under a CUP granted by the City on September 13, 1968. The text of the 1968 CUP does not expressly address (either bv wav of limitation or authorization^ the use or location of anv driveway on or access to the Proper^'. The 1968 CUP does not explic itly address the use of \^^oodhill Avenue os a sccondafy access to the property, nor do any of the-subsequent CUP approvals g ranted to Woodhill Country’ Club fertile various site improvements or operation changes which have occurred since 1968. Subsequent CUP approvals have been granted to Woodhill Country Club for construction of tennis courts in 1973. construction of a maintenance facility in 1988. and construction of a pumphouse in 1998. The applicant desires to formalize its right to use Woodhill Avenue os a secondary ncccaa to the property fof the safety of its members. The western driveway of the Woodhill Country Club abuts the platted right-of-wav of Woodhill Avenue. The City Council finds that the Club's use of Woodhill Avenue as an access read may create certain negative impacts to the ex isting Woodhill Avenue neighborhood unless some limitations on the Club’s use of the access arc established; The Club's main entrance is on Woodhill Road. Woodhill Road serves an existing neighborhood of eleven private homes. Traffic from Woodhill Road crosses the the railroad tracks and enters onto Countv Road 15. Pace 2 of 9 ^fL m The City Council desires to place reosonaMc limitation»on-WoodhiU Country €^t>b^ use of Weodhill Avenue as an access in order to engurc that the4 ^eaHh, safety tmd welfare of the existing regidctrtttt! neighborhood served by Woodhill Avenue is adequately protected, and to formally establish the-Gity's rights to revie^v and place reasonable controla on any access to the property which may have an impoet on thp vnfif>iis g^dsting rcaidt?ntial neighborhoods surrounding the property Development of the Woodhill Ridge subdivision occurred in the late 1980's and the Woodhill Avenue access was not used for regular vehicular use during or since that development occurred. The traffic levels on County Road 15 make access to the Club difficult, particularly from the west and north, due to the need to make left turns across heavy traffic onto County Road 15 and from County Road 15 to Woodhill Road. The Club wishes to use of Woodhill Avenue as an a secondary access for vehicular lo ilic Fiopciiv. Tlie use of Woodlull Avenue as an access for regular vcliiculcir traffic to Woodhill Country Club will be a change from the traffic pattern in place since 1QS0 and mp.v change the current character of Woodhill Avenue, which has functioned as a dead-end street for the past 20 yeors since 1980. 4^11. The City Council finds that the Club's use of Woodhill Avenue as an access road may create certain negative impacts to the existing Woodhill Avenue neit^hborhood unless some limitations on the Club's use of the access are established. The City Council desires to place limitations on Woodhill Country Club's use of Woodhill Avenue as a secondary access in order to ensure that the health, safety and welfare of the existing residential neighborhoods served bv Woodhill Avenue is adequately protected, and that anv negative impacts which might be created by the Club’s use of Woodhill Avenue are minimized or avoided. •H-12. The City Council finds that granting this Conditional Use Permit to allow use of Woodhill Avenue as a secondary access on the terms set forth in this permit will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light- air, nor pose other dangers to neighboring properties, nor will it be materially ipiurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and that the proposed location of the use of the access will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the Citv. Page 3 of 9 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby grants to Woodhill Country Club an amendment to its 1968 Conditional Use Permit to allow limited access via Woodhill Avenue subject to the following conditions: 4-2. The right of the Club to the reasonable use of the Woodhill Avenue access is hereby acknowledged and granted, subject to the the right and authority of the City to place restrictions on the use of the access as necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare, and subject to the conditions of this permit. The City does not reserve the right to completely close the Woodhill Avenue access under the CUP process. The Club shall install a paved driveway pave the road (to be hereinafter referred to as "the Woodhill Avenue access") within the dedicated right-of-way of Woodhill Avenue extending from the easterly end of the City-maintained currently paved portion of Woodhill Avenue, to the easterly end of the dedicated right-of-way. The Club may constmet-a improve the gravel or paved private driveway within the pEroperty to connect the Club's interior driveway nr»r»r»cr . qV»oH A H OkWAiA k\J tAAW %0 ^ ^ ^ ^ , . ....................... .................~ X r m------- « «-»------------------- administered land alteration permit as well as an after-the-fact permit from the Public Services Director for work within the right-of-way shall be issued with the CUP for such work, prior to rccommencingement of construction on the Woodhill Avenue access. The Club shall install a gate across its private driveway within 30 feet of at the western boundary of the f^mpertv Property, which gate shall be locked at all times except when used as follows: A.Use of the Woodhill Avenue access by emergency vehicles (police, fire, ambulance and utility). B.Use of the Woodhill Avenue access for transporting Club tractors to and from Long Lake for repair. C.Use of the Woodhill Avenue access for general access to the proper^ Property if the Woodhill Road access to County Road 15 is temporarily blocked (subject to reasonable notification to the City and affected neighbors), but only during the period of such temporary blockage. Page 4 of9 94. D.Use of the Woodhill Avenue access under the terms of that certain Easement Agreement, dated October 5, 1987 between the City, the Club, and MSM, which benefits one residential lot if County Road 15 access is blocked. E.Use of the Woodhill Avenue access as an entrance only (i.e. one way, from west to east) for private passenger vehicles between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. during those days that the Club is open. The City reserves the right to p eriodically determine v yhethcr pr oblc ma with use of the aceesfl have occu rred, and resewes the right to mod ify this CUP o r add con ditio ns, as-allowed by Ofono Zoning Cod e Section 10.09, Subd. 6(B). - However, the City do es nai reacfve theinght p ursuant to Orono Zoning Code Sectio n-10;09, Subd. 6(B) to pe rmanently close the aecefla. The following uses ore not exp licitly-o r implicitly allowed by the 1968 CUP nor by subsequent CUP’S granted te the Club since 1%8, and are sp ecifically not approved at this time, but may be applied fo r by the Club via a CUP amendment in the-future and would require further review and an amendment to this CUP: A.Conversion of the Woodhill Avenue access into the main entrance to the Club on a t . permanent basis. B.The authorized use Use of the Woodhill Avenue access as an entrance or exit by delivery, taxi, service, or other commercial vehicles. C. Use of the Woodhill Avenue access as an entrance or exit by the general public. D.Use of the Woodhill .^^•enlle access at time periods other than tho se allmved in the Basic Rights defined in Conditi on 2 as provided for in Condition 3 above. E.Expansion or pa ving of the Club’s westerly interior driveway between the maintenance building and the Woodhill Avenue access. F.Placement on Orono Orchard Road of any identification or directional signage concerning the Club. Page 5 of 9 45. sz City staff shall monitor use of the Woodhill Avenue access during its first season of operation and shall report to the Council any problems or concerns that are encountered. ^ City reserves the right to review and amend thc CUP after the 1999 golf season, to addrcas any problems prior to the-2000 golf season. Furthcrrtihe City wtH max periodicallyrfoMm indefinite period of time; meter the amount of traffic using the Woodhill Avenue access. the peak doily traffic count cxeceda 100 trips pct^ay at any time within the first year of o peration o r in subsequent years, the City shall have the right to review and amend thio CUP? including review of the need fo r a cord access gate at the-Woodhill Avenue entrance: In addition to the review provided for in Orono Zoning Code Section 10.09. Subdivision 11. the Council reserves the right, subiect to Condition 1. to review and amend the terms and conditions of this permit pursuant to Section 10.09. Subdivision 6B. The City mav review pnd amend the conditions of this CUP after the first golf season of OPeratiou under this CUP« or if the peak daily traffic count exceeds 100 trips per dav at anv time. The City >vill not review or amend the basic right of access as set forth in condition 1 of this Conditional Use Permit. The Club shall make or be responsible for the following improvements in conjunction with its construction of the Woodhill Avenue access: A. Installation of eastbound and northbound stop signs at the intersection of the public and private portions of Woodhill Avenue and the private road serving the Woodhill Ridge development (See Exhibit B). B. Installation of eastbound " 10 MPH" speed limit signs within the Woodhill Avenue access. C. D. E. Installation of westbound "Do Not Enter" signage at the Club’s interior driveway near the maintenance building. Installation of speed bumps along the Woodhill Avenue aeeess as requested at location(3) to be approve d by the Public Services Director. Paving of the Woodhill Avenue access from the eastern end of the currently paved roadway to the Clnh property line (driveway portions within dedicated right way): Page 6 of 9 F. Remo\ al of vegetation within the right-of-way of Woodhill Avenue or Orono Orchard Road that may impede adequate sight distance, subject to approval of as requested by the Public Services Director tm^ subject to notification of the abutting property owner abutting the vegetation to be removed. G. Installation of app rop riate stormwater facilities (culverts, ditches, etc.) as may be required by the City Engineer and other construction per Coffin & Gronbere engineering plan dated April 23. 1999 subject to provision of anv other information requested bv the Citv Engineer per his letter dated April 30. 1999 . H:------Provision of a driveway design and g rading plan acceptable to the City Enginee r. ■ If all access from the Club to County Road 15 is permanently blocked as a result of either County Road 15 alteration or improvement, or as a result of closure of the Woodhill Road access by the owner of the railroad right-of-way, the City recognizes the Club’s right of reasonable access, but reserves the right and authority to determine via the conditional use permit process whether such permanent access should be provided by allowing a full access to Woodhill Avenue, or via some otlier method or location, oiid what conditions must be imposed on that access to protect the health, safety and welfare of all citizens in the area and the ubcis of the roads, including W’oodhill members, guests and employees. ^9. Authorities granted by this conditional use permit run with the property not with the applicant, but ore permissive only and must be exe rcised by application for the required land alteration pcmiit-and permit for work within the public nght “of"way withm one year of the date of Council approval, or this conditional use penwit will ex pire on-that date (May 24-j il. 2000). ^10. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code Zoning Code per Section 10.09. Subdivision 12 and Section 10.99 . shall automatically and mav terminate any authority granted herein, and shall bo punishable as a misdemeanor after review bv the Council. 911. The undersigned applicant has read; and understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution, hereby agrees to Conditions 1-10. and on behalf of hunsclf, his itself, its heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property Property. Page 7 of 9 12. The applicant asserts that its acknowledgement of this Resolution and agreement to its conditions does not waive and is without prejudice to applicants claim of right to use the Woodhill Avenue access without limitation and without amendment of its 1968 CUP, a claim which the City denies. 13. The City will consent to a dismissal without prejudice of the litigation concerning the access. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 2 4th day of May 14th day of June. 1999. A'fTEST: i Linda S. Vec, City Clerk Gabriel Jabboiir, Mayor APPLICANT ACCEPTANCE: Autliorized Representative of Woodhill Country Club Page 8 of9 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 2414th day of MftvJune. 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 1999 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed tlie foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that hc(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 9 of 8 COdNfnil MliETlNQ JUN 1 4 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cl I Y U h ONO DATE: 6/2/99 ITEM NO.: j / Department Approval: a aA Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Senior Planning Coordinator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Sectijn: Zoning Item Description: Extension of Adult Use Moratorium On May 12,1997 Council adopted a moratorium on adult uses in all commercial and industrial zones of the City. In May 1998 that moratorium was extended to September 1998. In September 1998, the City extended the moratorium on adult uses to March 1999. In February 1999 the moratorium was extended to June 15,1999 at which time the moratorium is scheduled to expire. The City has not yet put in place an ordinance related to adult uses. By State Statute a moratorium may be no longer than 30 months in length. Therefore, the current moratorium may be extended to November 12, 1999. The attached ordinance extends the moratorium on adult uses to Nnveml'‘^r 12,1999 to provide additional time to develop an ordinance related to adult uses. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the attached ordinance extending the moratorium on adult uses in all commercial and industrial zones. ORDINANCE NO., SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING AN INTERIM MORATORIUM ON THE GRANTING OF BUILDING PERMITS, LAND SUBDIVISIONS, REZONING APPLICATIONS, CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMITS, VARIANCES, OR OTHER AUTHORITV RELATING TO 4^»>oLT USES IN ALL COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS IN THE CITY OF ORONO THE CITY OF ORONO DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. Authority. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.355, Subd. 4, the City is authorized to establish interim ordinances to regulate, restrict, or prohibit any use or development in all or a part of the City while the City is considering adoption or amendments of the comprehensive plan or official zoning controls. The City declares that this ordinance is established pursuant to the aforementioned statute and City ordinance. SECTION 2. Findings and Purpose. The City of Orono is conducting a comprehensive revision of its zoning code. One of the major goals of the revision is to minimize land use conflicts near residential neighborhoods and to promote maintenance and reinvestment in commercial and industrial property. The City Council is concerned about the effects of adult uses in commercial and industrial districts near residential areas, parks, and schools. The City Council is concerned that adult uses may contribute to instability through increased nighttime noise and traffic. The City Council is concerned that adult uses are not a service to the industrial and community level commercial districts. As a result of the important land use and zoning issues cited above, the City adopted an ordinance placing an interim moratorium on the granting of building permits, land subdivision, rezoning applications, conditional or special use permits, variances or other authority relating to adult uses in all commercial and industrial districts in the City of Orono. This moratorium is scheduled to expire on June 15, 1999. SECTION 3. Extension of Moratorium. Because the City has not completed its study and consideration of possible amendments to the comprehensive plan or official zoning controls to address the issues related to the establishment or expansion of adult uses, the moratorium relating to adult uses in all commercial and industrial districts in the City of Orono is hereby extended to November 12, 1999. Page 1 of2 I. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall be published in THE PIONEER and THE LAKER and shall be effective immediately. a vote of Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on the 14th day of June, 1999, by ayes and___nays. A1 ; REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <^Ofrhrriii mpetINQ JUN 1 4 1999 CITY Uh* OhONO Date: June U, 1999 Item No * /«2^ Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffroa Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2439 - Service 800 Road Agreement - 2nd Amendment of Deadline List of Exhibits A - Second Amendment to Road Agreement & B - Transmittal Letter C - First Amendment to Road Agreement D - May 17 Letter from Hugh Maynard Cliff Otten applied to MnDOT for reconveyance of the 'Brimhall triangle' property in April, but the MnDOT review process is taking longer than anticipated. As of this morning, we believe the process should be completed by the end of July. The deadlines in the Road Agreement were established to keep the process moving toward completion. Staff has no problem recommending the extension of the May 31 deadline for MnDOTs reconveyance approval, for an additional two months to July 31 (the attached document extends it only to June 30 - we will have a corrected version for Monday's meeting). Safety Concerns Regarding Full Turning Movements As part of the approval of the Ser\'ice 800 development proposal, the City approved locating the access at Brimhdl Avenue to enable a full turning movement access vs. a right-in/right-out access. This was contingent on approval by Mn/DOT. Although the Mn/DOT permitting section indicated the plan met their requirements, when the Mn/DOT engineering section reviewed the plan the> had concerns about the safety of providing full turning movements at the Brimhall location. They anticipate that, given the level of traffic on Highway iZ, full left turning movements may create safety problems at the intersection. If this occurs, Mn/DOT would have the authority to eliminate o. ne left turn movements. Currently, the properties on the south side of Highway 12 have full turning movements at the Brimhall intersection. Mn/DOT initially indicated it would prefer that the left hand turning movements on both the north and south side of the intersection be limited to left turns in and that left turns out not be allowed. Although this would be preferred by Service 800 over right-in/right- out only access, it would be problematic for the existing businesses on the south side of Highway 12 who currently have the left turn out access. 1 Pi • , ''t • I f i #2439 - Service 800 Road Agreement June 11,1999 Page 2 After further review, Mn/DOT has agreed to authorize left-tum-in access for Service 800 while maintaining the full turning movements on the south side of the intersection. Staff believes this is a reasonable balance between safety concerns and providing reasonable access to Service 800. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Approve extending the deadline for MnDOT reconveyance approval to July 31, 1999. FROM LEONARD STREET DEINARD (WED) 6. 2’99 9:33/ST. 9:32/NO. 4261040473 P 3 A (space above reserved for recording information) SECOND AMENDMENT TO ROAD AGREEMENT , 1999 asThat certain Hoad Agreement dated February 12,1999, and filed ^ „ Hennepin County Registrar of Titles Document No. _--------------- by and among Green Valley Associates. Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Developer ”). Clifford L. Otten and Louise W^efield Otten, husband and wife (“Otten”) and the City of Orono. a Mmnesoia municipal corporation ( Uty of Orono”) is further amended a.s follows: 1 In the first sentence of paragraph 3, the deadline for Minnesota Dcpaitment of Tran^r^on pproval of the reconveyance of the Brimhall Triangle to Otten is hereby changed to June 30,a All other terms conditions of the Roadway Agreement remain in ftill force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment to Road Agreement as of June__, 1 999. CITY OF ORONO Clifford L. Otten Louise Wakefield Otten GREEN VALLEY ASSOCIATES, INC. By: Jean Mork Bredeson, President 1812396.01 printed d^2/99 8;33 AM i FROM LEONARD STREET DEINARD (WED) 6. 2’99 9:34/ST. 9:32/NO. 4261040473 P 4 y STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The forcgoinji insm:n:.:r.t ^Yas acknowledged before me this ------- day of 1999 by Clifford L. Otten and LouHe Wakefield Otten, husband and wife NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this dav of 1999 by Jean MorV Bredeson, the President of Green Valley Associates. Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation.. NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss. day ofThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this —^ 1999 by------------------ —» of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the city. NOTARY PUBLIC THIS LNSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY; Leonard, Street and Dcinard (IIMM) 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300 Minneapolis, MN 53402 inimM t- i »r FROM LEONARD STREET DEINARD (V/ED) 6. 2’99 9:33/ST. 9:32/NO. 4261040473 P 2 LEONARD; STREET AND DEINARD e FROFESSIOHAL A5SOCIATTON June 2,1999 Hu5h M. Maynard 612-335-19SI hmml 562@leonard.com Michael Gaffron City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55323 Re: Brimhall Triangle; Our File 15251 -1 Dear Mike: This letter is in furtherance of our telephone conversation this morning. Today I called Jim Kirchner at MnDoT to check on the progress of MnDoT approval of reconveyance of the Brimhall Triangle to Mr. & Mrs. Cliff Otten. He told me that he is still awaiting some responses from MnDoT people. All responses were due last week and he expects to receive the final responses any day now. I suggested to you that the Road Agreement be amended to change the MnDoT approval deadline to June 30. You saw no problem witli extending the deadline and you said you would put it on tlie Orono City Council agenda for its next meeting, which will be Monday, June 14. Enclosed is my proposed Second Amendment to Road Agreement for approval by the City Council. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD Hugh M. Maynard cc w/cncl:Stephen R. Pflaiun, Esq. (Leonard, Street and Deinard) Cliff Otten (Otter. Bros. Nursery) Jean Mork Bredeson (Service 800, Inc.) Rich Kicmen (KM Building Co.) 150 Sooth PiTTK Steut SuiTi 1300 M»*viapoiii , MiwwtiOTA 55401 TfcL 6l>*33S**5®^ pAX <ll-}35*lSsr LAW OII1CI9 IN MfKNEAPOUl, lAlNT PAVt AND MANKATO (space above reserved for recording information) FIRST AMENDMENT TO ROAD AGREEMENT That certain Road Agreement dated February 12,1999, and filed____________, 1999 as Hennepin County Registrar of Titles Document No.___________by and among Green Valley Associates, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Developer ”), Clifford L. Otten and Louise Wakefield Otten, husband and wife (“Otten”) and the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City of Orono”) is amended as follows: 1. The March 15, 1999 deadline in the first sentence of paragraph 3 is hereby changed to March 31, 1999. The parties acknowledge that the revised deadline has been met. 2. The April 30, 1999 deadline in the first sentence of paragraph 3 is hereby changed to May 31, 1999. 1 3. All other terms and conditions of the Roadway Agreement remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to Road Agreegjient as of April 12.. 1999. CITY OF ORONO Louise Wakefieln Otten GREEN VALLEY ASSOCIATES, INC. ebeson. President Bv A ’ Its it. l<i CUrIC 17936«3.0I Printed 5/4/9910:43 AM Jb Mny 17. 1999 LEONARD; STREET AND DEINARD PROfESSIONAL ASSOCIATION • • ; HAY ) P: |?90 UuV v.-. iO,\'Q Hush M. Mavnard 612-335-1981 hmm 1562@leonard.com Michael Gaffron City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55323 Re: Brimhall Triangle; Our File 15251-1 Deal Mike: This is just an update. On Friday I called Jim Kirchner at MnDoT to check on the progress of MnDoT approval of reconveyance of the Brimhall Triangle to Mr. & Mrs. Cliff Otten. Today Jim left me this voice-mail message: “The package is still circulating. I expect it back any time. Hopefully everyone is positive about the reconveyance.” It looks like we’re on schedule to meet the May 31st deadline under the Read Agreement. Very truly yours, i - LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD Hugh M. Mavr.ard / cc w/encl: Stephen R. Pflaum, Esq. Cliff Otten Jean Mork Bredeson 150 SouiH Fiith Street Suite 2300 Minneapolis , Minnesota 55402 Tel 612-335-1500 Fax 6i2-335-i6$7 LAW OFFICES IN MINNEAPOLIS. SAINT PAUL AND MANKATO cnuM/^n mpetinG JUN 1 4 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cl IY OHONO DATE: June 8, 1999 ITEM NO,= /3 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: / Asenda Section: Engineer’s Report Item Description: Schedule Public Hearing for Fox Ridge Sewer Project The Fox Ridge neighborhood adjacent to Brown Road South was included in the recent MUSA expansions for sewer hot spots. We have had a neighborhood meeting with the project area residents to discuss this project. Two options were presented to the residents. A gravity sewer option with a municipal lift station at an estimated per unit cost of $33,800. The other option presented was a pressure system in which each property would own and operate their own residential grinder station. The estimated unit cost for this option is $21,100 which includes a $4,500 allowance for residents to purchase their own grinder station. We have discussed this project with the City of Long Lake staff and Metro Council Environmental Services staff. The most cost effective solution is to pump the waste water north along Brown Road to the Long Lake sewer system at the Brown RoadAVatertown Road intersection. Both Long Lake and MCES staff are agreeable with this option. This project is planned for year 2000 construction and could be completed under one contract with the Webber Hills project. Project surveying and design can be completed this year for a winter 2000 bid opening and assessment hearing. \ . The project area residents have sifbmitted a petition requesting that the City move forward with this project. There are also several residents along Brown Road north of the project that will be adjacent to the new force main that have expressed an interest in obtaining sewer. These properties are not in the MUSA. The current City policy is to allow use of the 50 additional sewer units if the following three criteria are met: 1. Existing residential development. 2. Non-conforming septic system. 3. No replacement septic sites available. Our recommendation is for Council approval of the attached resolutions ordering the preparation and acceptance of the feasibility study and scheduling a public hearing at the regularly scheduled Council meeting on July 12th. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of resolution ordering preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of municipal sanitary sewer to serve the Fox Ridge area. Approval of resolution receiving report and calling hearing on the Fox Ridge area sanitary sewer improvement. A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF MUNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER TO SERVE THE FOX RIDGE AREA WHEREAS, the project area was included in the recent MUSA expansion for sanitary sewer services, a neighborhood informational meeting was held to discuss the project, and project area residents have submitted a letter indicating interest in obtaining sanitary sewer; and WHEREAS, the City En^eer has provided preliminary cost estimates for a sanitary sewer extension; however, additional information is needed in order to establish the feasibility of such a project; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that municipal sanitary sewer trunks and/or laterals be constructed to serve the Fox ^dge area and that the benefitted property(s) be assessed for all of the cost of the imp»'ovsments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota that the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study, and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective, and feasible and whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 14th day of June, 1999. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk • tt t A RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON FOX RIDGE SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No.of the Council adopted Junel4, 1999, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer in reference to the Fox Ridge sanitary sewer improvement, and this report was received by the Council on June 14, 1999; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 1. 2. The Council will consider the installation of such sanitary sewer improvement in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $ 190,000. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 12th day of July, 1999 in the Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, at 7:00 p.m. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of June, 1999. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk \J 1 I« • .N) ^ 1• 1 1L___n HI*.*! n\ Report For • t .Fox Ridge Sanitary Sewer Orono, Minnesota , June, 1999 File No. 139-GEN Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Engineers & Architects June 8,1999 Bonestfoo. Rosene. Anderlik Assoastes. tnc. is Afftrmativt Acdon/iqvut Opportunity Employte Prmctpsts Otto C. Boneitror. PE. • Joseph C. Anderllli. PE. • Mjrvin L Sorvjlj. PE. • Glenn R Cook. PE • Pober. G Schunicht. PE. • Jerry A. Bouroon. PE. • Robert ^ Roiene. PE.. R*:hjrd E Turner. PE. end Sufjn M Eberiia CPA.. Senior Consuicents Associate Pnncipsir Howard A. Sanford. PE • Keith A. Gordon. PE. • Robert R. Ffefferte. PE. • Richard w. Foster. PE. • David O Loskota. PE • Robert C. Russek. A I.A. • Mark A. Hanson. P£. • Michael T. Rauimann. P^ • Ted K Field. PE. • Kenneth P. Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolfs. PE. • S'cJney P. Will-'amsor' *>’ » ' ^':ibcrt F. Kotsmith • Agnes M. Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. P.E. Offices: St Paul. Ro*.n« ;er. Vfc.iimar and St. Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl \tfeOftfe' WWWbonestroo com Mr. Gieg Gappa Director of Public Services City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323-0066 Re: Fox Ridge Feasibility Report File No. 139-GEN Dear Greg: As directed by City staff, we have reviewed the existing conditions and the possible installation of sanitary sewer to serve the Fox Ridge neighborhood. The neighborhood is located on the east and west sides cf South Brown RoaH inct south of the T lire Line trail in Orono There are nine total pronerties that would benefit from sanitary sewer. City records indicate that most septic systems in the neighborhood are non-conforming or failing. Designs for both a gravity system and a grinder (pressure) system were considered as shown on Figures 1 and 2. Toe gravity ^ysiciit v^ualu ic4oire llic irulallalion of a permanent lift station in the Fox Ridge neighborhood. Gravity sewer pipe would be installed in the street and carry flows to the lift statioiL Sanitary sewer sovrices would be extended to the property lines. The grinder system option would require the installation of a common forcemain along the edge of the existing street. Services would be extended to the property lines. Each residence would be served by a residential grinder station that would pump flows into the common forcemain In both the gravity and pressure options, the sewer pipe crossings under C.R. 146 and the Luce Line trail would be jacked or directionally bored. Both systems assume flows would be pumped to an existing gravity manhole at the intersection of Brown Road and Watertown Road in Long Lake. The following is a summary of the estimated costs for each cation: Area ff of Units Est Project Cost Est Cost/Unit Fox Ridge-Grinder 9 $190,000 $21,100 Fox Ridge-Gravity 9 $304,000 $33,800 The gravity sewer option would require that the sewer be installed in the roadway and therefOTe conq>lete street reconstruction will be requir^. .Street reconstruction costs have been included in the gravity sewer estimate shown above. The grinder option assumes that the forcemain would be directionally bored along the edge of the roadways and therefore street repairs would be necessary only at manhole locations. The estimated costs are based on 1999 unit prices and can be related to the ENR Construction Cost Index for May, 1999 of 6,006. Soil investigation work has not been completed and the estimated costs arc based on typical Orono soils. I 2335 West Highway 36 - St. Paul. MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 > Fax: 651-636-1311 The City held an informal neighborhood meeting with the residents of the Fox Ridge neighborhood earlier this year. The purpose of the meeting was to answer questions about the sewer options. The iicighborhood appears to be in favor of a grinder system option based on resident input at the meeting and subsequent feedback to the City. The project would require a license agreement between the City and the Minnescta Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR) to cross the Luce Line trail. Permits will be required from Hennepin County and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The construction of the sanitary sewer to serve the Fox Ridge neighborhood is feasible from an engineering standpoint The project is necessary because of the non-conforming septic systems and potential pollution problems. The capital cost as well as operation and maintenance costs have been considered in determining that the project is cost effective. The cost of these improvements are interrelated and should be assigned equitably between all property owners. The following recommendations are presented for consideration by the Orono City Council: 1.That this Report be adopted as the guide for installation of sanitary sewer to serve the Fox Ridge neighborhood. 2. That the City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the proposed project prior to the public hearing. 3.That a public hearing be held on the proposed improvements. The total estimated project cost of $190,000 should be incorporated in the public notice. The total estimated cost of $190,000 for the grinder system includes a 5 percent contingency, a 20 percent allowance for design, inspection, legal, and administration costs, and a S percent allowance for capitalized interest and bonding costs during construction. The cost estimate does not include easement costs that could be incurred on the project. The installation, operation and maintenance of the grinder stations and the connection of the sewer between the property line and the home will be the responsibility of the property owners. Detailed cost estimates for both options are attached for your review. We would be pleased to discuss this report further with the City Council or City staff at any mutually convenient time. Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Tom Kellogg I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional En^cer under the laws of the State of Mimiesota. ^ ________________________ Glenn R. Cook, PJE. Date: June 8.1999 Reg. No. 9451 I 4" FORCEMAIN TQ AT INTERSECTION AND WATERTOWN GRAVITY MANHOLE OF SOUTH BROWN RD. ROAD. i o q: CD ESTIMATED PROw 'T ESTIMATED COST COST $304,000 i UNIT $33,800 Oin -------------FORCEMAIN GRAVITY SEWER • MANHOLE ■ LIFT STATION 200 400 FOX RIDGE Scale in feet ^ j Bonestroo ORONO, MINNESOTA GRAVITY SEWER OPTION Rosene Anderiik & FIGURE 1 Assodates \139GEN\139F0XS01 .DWG 3/9/1999 139GEN J FOX RIDGE Scote in feet ORONO. MINNESOTA RESIDENTIAL GRINDER OPTION \139CE.N\139FOXR01.0WC 3/9/1999 1/11 Bonestroo S^Rosene Anderiik & FIGURE 2 ^ I/Usodates 139CEN FOX RIDGE SANITARY SEWER - GRAVITY OPTION PREUMINARY COST ESTIMATE______________ 4 ♦. 8" PVC sanitary sewer Jack 8" PVC sewer, Incl. Casing Directional bore 4“ HOPE forcemain Standard 4’ dia. MH MH overdepth 8* X 4" wye 4“ PVC service pipe Improved pipe foundation Televise sewer Mechanical trench compaction Submersible pump lift station Connect to existing manhole Mobilization Silt fence Bituminous surface removal Common excavation Geotextile fabric Class 5 aggregate base, 100% crushed Type 31 bituminous base course Type 41 bituminous wear course Bituminous material for tack coat Repair driveways Sod with 4* topsoil Seeding wAopsoil, mulch, and fertilizer LF 28.00 625 $17,500 LF 200.00 75 15,000 LF 22.00 2,300 50,600 EA 1,500.00 5 7,500 LF 100.00 10 1,000 EA 75.00 9 675 LF 20.00 270 5,400 LF 1.00 1,075 1,075 LF 1.00 700 700 LF 1.00 895 895 EA 55,000.00 1 55,000 EA 2,000.00 1 2,000 LS 5,000.00 1 5,000 LF 2.50 1,600 4,000 SY 2.00 2,600 5,200 CY 6.00 1,000 6,000 SY 1.50 2,600 3,900 TN 10.00 1,600 16,000 TN 32.00 315 10,080 TN 35.00 235 8,225 GL 1.50 150 225 EA 750.00 9 6,750 SY 2.50 2,350 5,875 AC 3,000.00 0.3 900 Estimated Construction Cost +5% Contingencies +20% Legal, Engineering arid Administration +5% Capitalized Interest and Bonding Total Eatimated Coat $229,500 11.475 $240,975 48,195 $289,170 14,459 $303,629 FOX RIDGE SANITARY SEWER • RESIDENTIAL GRINDER OPTION PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 1 1/2* HOPE service pipe LF 10.00 100 $1,000 1 1/2" HOPE service pipe-directional bore LF 20.00 360 7,200 2" HOPE forceinain-ulrectional bore LF 20.00 2,950 59,000 HOPE service tee EA 50.00 9 450 Curb stop EA 200.00 9 1,800 Cleanout manhole EA 2,500.00 6 15,000 Repair driveways EA 750.00 3 2,250 Bituminous street patching SY 10.00 200 2,000 Connect to existing manhole EA 2,000.00 1 2,000 Erosion control fence LF 2.50 300 750 fviobiiizaiion LS 5,000.00 1 e ryr\r\ Sod with 4* topsoil SY 2.50 2,200 5,500 Seeding wAopsoil, mulch, and fertilizer AC 3,000.00 0.3 900 Residential grinder station EA 4,500.00 9 40,500 Estimated Construction Cost ■l■S% Contingencies •l■20% Legal, Engineering and Administration •fS% Capitalized Interest and Bonding Total Estimated Cost *1. $143,350 7J68 $150,518 30,104 $180,621 9,031 $189,652 ‘1 i coMMni meeting REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JUN 1 4 1999 out ui-omonu DATE: June 11,1999 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Approve Purchase of Lawn Mowers for Golf Course Additional information will be provided at the Council meeting on this item. •<4 1: 4 r: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION coi iMrji, mhETINGJUN 1 4 1999CITY OF OhUNO Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Directc. of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: DATE: June 10, 1999 ITEM NO.: Agenda Section: Engineering Item Description: Approve Purchase of Public Works Dump Truck ' The 1998 wpital outlay budget included $68,500 for the replacement of an existing dump/plow ^ck. This truck was ordered in early 1998 through the State of Minnesota Cooperative ^ch^ing Program. The truck has just arrived at the dealer because of a large backloc in obtaining the automatic transmission. Truck, Boyer Ford 6.5% MN Sales Tax Paid At Time of Licensing J-Craft, Truck Box and Snow Plow Equipment (Includes MN Sales Tax) Total Cost COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: $47,916.00 3.115.00 22.384.00 $73,415.00 Approve purchase of Public Works replacement dump/plow truck from Boyer Ford with accessones from J-Craft at a total cost of $73,415.00 to be funded from the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund budget with a budget adjustment of $73,415.00. CniiMr;H mppTINQ JUN 1 4 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION UI Y or UiiU/vO DATE: June 14, 1999 ITEM NO.; fip Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Request for Payment ^3, Lift Station ^13 Rehabilitation We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Payment H'i, to GHT Construction, Delano MN in the amount of $4,037.88. 1 . ' BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK © 6516361311 06/04/99 15:58 0 :02/04 NO:008 Bdhestfod ^Rosene fl 4 For Period Assocfatei----------- Owner_____City of Orono. 2750 Kelly Parkway. PO Box 66, Cryttol B«v. MN SS323-00 Date: June 4. \999 March 19. l999toMav31.1999 Request No: Contractor: GHT Construction. Inc.. 2750 102nd Street SE. Delano. MN 55328 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT LIFT STATION NO. 13 REHABILITATION BRA FILE NO. 139-9M00 COPY summary I Original Contract Amount Change Order • Addition Change Order - Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned 8 Lest Retainage 2V« 9 Subtoal Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 107,900.00 2 3 4 5 S 7 S S S 107.900.00 S IOS.906.00 10 II s s s s s s 0.00 I05.90d.00 2.111.12 l03.7g7.M 99.750.00 4.037.18 Recommended for Approval by: * '' BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCUTES, INC. Approved by Contractor GHT CONSTR. INC. Approved by Owner: CITY OF ORONO Specified Contract Completion Date: MAY 31.1999 ADDDAlienV If B ■ ■ W BWP TXJihi Date: (nmranR (Date) K:\139M 39-94>1\WOROVtEQUEST3WB2 I * BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK © 6516361311 06/04/99 15:58 0 :03/04 NO:008 No. Item Approved Ahemate No. t I Temporary controls, pumps and piping for Contract Unit Qnantily Unh Price Qaibttty Current to Date Quantity Amount to Date 5 6 7 interim conveyance LS 1 5,500.00 1.00 0.09 5,000.00 Lift station demolition or new valve vault LS 1 6,800.00 1.00 0.12 6,000.00 New pumps, piping, valves, wet well, top hatch, and slab LS 1 74,000.00 1.00 74,000.00 New control panel, base slab, and miscellaneous electrical LS 1 20,000.00 1.00 20.000.00 Seeding with 4 inch topsoil SY 30 4.00 Sod with 4 inch topsoil SY 10 8.00 8 inch Class 5 aggregate base TN 17 40.00 22.65 22.65 906.00 3 inch thick bituminous driveway TN 8 90.00 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE SIOS^OO K:V130M39-Oe>nWOROVREOUEST2. W82 .:! BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK © 6516361311 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS Owner City of Orono Prwjcc: No. File No. I39-98-800 Contractor GHT Constr. Inc. CHANGE ORDERS PAYMENT SUMMARY Material on Hand K At 30\ 19».Oa>1\WOROVREQUEST3 W82 06/04/99 15:58 g :04/04*NO:008 l 2 3 Total Chaase Orders 1 Start 02/25/99 63.148.67 3.323.61 45.500.00 02'25^^9 03/19/99 36.601.33 3.230.00 105.000.00 3 03/19/99 05/31/99 4.037.88 2.118.12 105.906 00 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Payment to Date S103.787.88 Orisinal Contract SI 07.900 00 Reuina^e. Payment No. 3 2.M8.I2 Chtnae Orden Total Amount Earned SI 05.906.00 Revised Contract SI 07.900.00 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION »*c«=TING JUN 1 4 1999 cu t u»* unuivu DATE: June 14, 1999 ITEM NO.: / “7 / I Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Request for Payment ^8, Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Payment ^8, to Shank Constructors, Brooklyn Park MN in the amount of $28,193.00. 1 . BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK ©6516361311 06/09/99 09:55 0 :02/05‘ N0:l46 II Boneni Ros«ne ntfr: City of Orono. 2750 Kelly Pkwy. Orono. MN 5S323-00«6 Date: June 9, 1999 1 %or Period: April 30.1999 to June 4,1999 ' Aijociate Request No: iMWwtMtAtuumtjContractor: Shank Constructors. Inc., 3S01 8Sth Ave N. Brooklyn Park. MN 55445 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NAVARRE W.*TER TREATMENT FACILITY RE VO''AT! ON BRA FILE NO. 13997 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order • Addition Change Order - Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Dale Material on Hand Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 2V« 9 Subtotal lU Less Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 3 4 5 6 7 S s 13,138.00 8 S $ s s s s s $ 1 . Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved by Contractor: SHANK CONSTRUCTORS, INC. Approved by Owner: CITY OF ORONO Specified Contract Completion Date: 5-15-99 Date: K:\139Vt3S&nW0RCKREQUEST8.WB2 8 636.600 649,738 642.738 0.00 642,738 12.853 629.883 601,690 28,193 I BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK ^ 6516361311 06/09/99 09:55 0 :03/05 NO:146 No. Item 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to |] 14 15 16 17 18 19 3M 31 Cootract Unit Qnaneity Total price for the renovation of the Navarre Water Treatment Facility, including demolition, process equipment (by base bid manufacturers, as described in Part 111 of this Proposal) plumbing, HVAC, electrical work, controls and instrumentation, process piping, painting, and all other items shown, spcciHed, or implied to place the facility into full operation for thel.UMPSUMof: LS Breakdowo of above: Mobilization & Div. I Demo • Lab Demo - Mat Concrete Bottom • Lab. Concrete Bottom • Mat. Div. 5 • Lab. Div. 5 - Mat. Div 8 - Lab. Div. g. Mat. Softening Equip - Ext. Softening Equip - Int. 12 Filter Equip - Ext. 13 Fitter Equip - Int. Piping Sc Valves Interior Filler Equip • Lab. Filter Equip • Mat. Softening Equip • Lab. Softening Equip • Mat. 2u Filter Media • Lab. 21 Filter Media . .Mai. 22 Softening Media • Lab. 23 Softening Media • Mat. 24 Chemical Feed - l.ab 25 Chemical Feed - Mai. 26 Pumps - Lab. 27 Pumps - Mai. 28 Blower • Lab. 29 Blower • Mat. Piping Sc Valves - Lab. Piping & Valves • Mat liBlt Qtiamiry Current Prke to Date Quantity Amount to Date 636.600.00 J7.R94.0n 100%37,894 12,944.00 100%12.944 11,850.00 100%11,850 10,121.00 100%10,121 10,360.00 100%10.360 493.00 100%493 1,173.00 100%1.173 1,190 00 100%1,190.00 4,989.00 100%4,989.00 5,200.00 100%5,200 9,000.00 100?'.9.000 13,500.00 100%13,500 31.000.00 100?'.31,000 13,600.00 100%13,600 6,600.00 85%5,610 15.692 00 100?'.15.692 53,79300 100%53,793 2,332.00 100%2.352 17,038.00 100%17,038 4.200.00 100%4,200 28.375.00 100*/i 28.375 563.0')100%563 18.554 00 100?'.18,554 7,352 00 100%7.352 8.393.00 100%8,393 7,500.00 100%7,500 16.827.00 100?'.16,827 5.987.00 100?'.5.987 6.757.00 I00?-i 6,757 26.922.00 100?.26,922 87,181.00 100?'.87.181 K \l39\t390AWORD\REQU6ST8 WB2 BONESTROO ROS5NE ANDERLIK ©6516361311 06/09/99 09:55 0 :04/05 R0:146 32 Hvac 16,200.00 100%16,200 33 Ficcrrical 134,000.00 97%7%129,980 34 Steel 1.200.00 58%700 35 Welding 5,300.00 86%4.731 36 Grinding 2.300 00 92%2,109 37 Paint Ceiling 5.50000 90%4.950 38 Consoltdiition Grouting 7,638.00 100%7.638 Total Work Completed To Date 642,731 K M3d\l3W7\WORI>ftEQUEST6 WB2 BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK ©6516361311 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS Owner CITYOFORONO Prniffl Nil. File No. Contractor SHANK CONSTRUCTORS. INC CHANGE ORDERS PA\TVIENT SUMM/VRY No. Period Piymcnt RcUlaatc Material on Hand 0.00 06/09/99 09:55 0:05/05 N0:146 No.Date DtscripHoD ' AmouDt 1 03/04/99 Refer to Chanae Order No. 1 .‘:.50().00 2 04/07/99 Refer Co Change Order No. 2 7,638.00 11 • Total Chanee Orden $13,138.00 Completed 1 Start 10/31/98 79.313 4.174 58.969 2 10/31'98 12/01/98 19.149 5.182 103.644 3 12/01/98 01/05/99 86.430 9,731 146.770 4 01 05 99 0128.99 165.139 18.423 368.453 01/28/99 03/05/99 59.759 21,568 431.357 6 03/05/99 04/02/99 t . 135,657 28,708 574.154 7 (U/02 90 04/30/99 56,244 31.668 6.3.3.358 s 0430 99 06,04/99 28.193 12.855 642.738 9 10 Total Payment to Date S629.884 Oriftinol Contract $636,600.00 Rciainaqe. Payment No 8 SI2.855 Chanjie Orders 13,138.00 Total Amount Earned $642,739 Revised Contract $649.738<M) 4 ICM^t3997\WOROtREQUE$T8.WB2 COUMnii meeting illN \ 4 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION t ur unoi^u DATE: June 10, 1999 ITEM NO.;n Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineering Item Description: Purchase of Fuel Dispensing System The existing TECH 21 fuel dispensing is not y2k compliant and is also not being manufactured anymore as the company is out of business. This system needs to be replaced before the end of this year. This is the only major item we have discovered in our y2k inventory of the City equipment and facilities with the exception of some of the older computers and our networking software which are scheduled to be upgraded through the normal computer upgrading program. We have selected a Petrovend Automated Fuel Management system with Phoenix Plus Software. This system is being installed by many firms that are replacing TECH 21 systems and is in use by many metro area cities. The K800 is a basic system designed for smaller facility operations and has very flexible report generating capabilities. We have obtained quotations for the purchase and installation from three metro area suppliers of this system. A summary of the quotations received is shown below. ♦Griggs Contracting, Shoreview, MN Miimesota Petroleum Service, Fridley, MN $5,620.00 $6,692.09 Pump & Meter Service, Hopkins, MN $9,160.18 Wc arc rcconm'.cnding purchase of Petrovend K800 System from Griggs Contracting for $5,620.00. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to award the bid for the fuel dispensing system to Griggs Contracting, Shoreview, MN in the amount of $5,620.00, including sales tax; to be funded from the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund and to amend the budget by $5,620.00. COilwrii fc*PGTlNG JUN 1 4 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 11 unum DATE: June 11,1999 ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Release of Tax Forfeit Parcel at 1025 Brown Road South - Resolution In 1982. the City acauired an approximately .14 acre parcel adjacent to Brown Road South through tax forfeiture. The parcel was acquired for potential drainage and utility needs. The property adjacent to this parcel has now been subdivided. The City no longer has a need for the parcel. It is recommended this parcel be released for sale to adjacent property owners, subject to the placement of a flowage and conservation easement over the entire parcel, and a drainage and utility easement along the eastern boundary of the parcel. A resolution authorizing release of the property for sale to adjacent property owners with these conditions is attached for Council consideration. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion regarding the adoption of a resolution releasing the tax forfeit property at 1025 Brown Road South for sale to adjacent property owners. # « • • M«# •«#• •••• ■ Iff—?mum mu 90 itm% nfmt Mt mutw*9-; ; ;• :• '• .:x- HOAD I500 ’>04'55’W 1JX.t2 0 % 0% • m% »jyo»_ _ __99UTM— ____ ____ ______t_______> I _____ _____ I \NO0OQ4'SS’p\ ^ \y^t~i HCi/Tr: ^ t97.44 -A 5 r ^^aajo ------ >4^ • ------ • — • -T-V fM M ^ jf -ft It ^ jW fT ^----T- y/ / ---------- I V > I, 5^;/ % \ HET 4M0 uit/nr —-Vi i y iw«f soo®0fl'jo*ir «• AWU.OW ornn I - «mW»T mm '^TT^wmakijc w^os'jaT V ' j£i ___^«./o __ ' _ LAND 7 / — j t I * ^ j vM^ ll --- M ^ . _v — *•••» mtrm f tmmr of —-r\ jeM«SfD«S nVNOf t>lf(f^ \ jreow 0omwm \ •wi mu u/Cmt ^^iut 4 fM. M tm.m c.i“?5!i MaxfMW \••riN »• ui JSmfffOUf^fpoKu imr sramo Atjoinoff S'! . y'i.^S89042'52 ’€ \/ ••• ^ uuut mu uf JOmt%fOAfS/ J/.^ V — - /joof unor arcaw f 4fl»«0f ^ mrmr ufjmmsfots rmrtOf lmC mcmm Aommm i « • / 11>**'\* *5 * . •;:. •• • r::'::^^^'•• .... A RESOLUTION TO RELEASE TAX FORFEITED LAND FOR PRIVATE SALE TO ADJACENT OWNERS WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the parcel known as PID: 10-117-23 21 0002 and legally described as; Section 10, Township 117 and Range 23 - That part of NE 1/4 of NW 1/4 corresponding to Lot 10, Block 6, Minnetonka View, now vacated including adjacent 1/2 of street and alley vacated. became the property of the State of Minnesota for non-payment of real estate taxes on July 19,1977, and was conveyed to the City of Orono by State Deed No. 161146 on February 8,1982; and WHEREAS, the City has deteraiined the public use for which the parcel was acquired is no longer necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby authorize the reconveyance of the parcel listed below to the State of Minnesota, and approves the public sale of said parcel of land to adjacent property owners; subject to the placement of a flowage and conservation easement over the entire parcel, and a drainage and utility easement over the easterly ten feet of the parcel. The parcel to be sold remains subject to applicable zoning ordinance provisions, including those regulations providing for minimum lot area and minimum lot width. Substandard parcels may be usable only in combination with other adjoining parcel(s). 'Diis property does not meet current zoning standards and is unbuildable. Parcel to be released for sale to adjacent owners only: PID:10-117-2321 0002 Legal Description: Section 10, Township 117 and Range 23 - That part of NE 1/4 of NW 1/4 corresponding to Lot 10, Block 6, Minnetonka View, now vacated including adjacent 1/2 of street and alley vacated. Page 1 of 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City Administrator be authorized and directed to sign the Reconveyance of Forfeited Lands to State of Minnesota by Governmental Subdivisions on behalf of the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of June, 1999. ATTEST; Linda S. Vcc, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 2 of 2 COf»M<^ll MCPTING JUN 1 4 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION IT ur unoriiO DATE: June 9,1999 ITEM NO: ^ 0 Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Summary of May 20,1999 Lake Area Housing Workshop Representatives of 14 cities around Lake Minnetonka attended a housing workshop on May 20,1999 to obtain information and discuss the prtential for cooperative efforts regarding the preservation and provision of affordable and life cycle housing in the lake area. The meeting began with an overview of a subregional housing study that summarized existing housing in the lake area and suggested a cooperative subregional approach to meeting the housing needs of the lake area. Next, Tom Fulton of the Family Housing Fund and Joe Errigo of Common Bond Communities provided information regarding the successful implementation of affordable housing. The meeting ended with a discussion regarding lake area housing needs, and whether the lake area cities were interested in moving toward a cooperative approach to meeting the area's housing needs. A summary of some of tlic key comments made during this discussion, from my perspective, is as follows: It was suggested that the lake area cities do not need to focus on providing the solution for meeting the metropolitan region's housing needs. Instead we need to focus on meeting the housing needs of the lake area. This involves identifying the fiill range of housing needs, both current and projected. These include housing that is affordable to, and meets the needs of, volunteer fire fighters, public works maintenance staff, as well as all other employees of the lake area cities, the employees of the lake area schools, and the employees of current and projected businesses in the lake area. The lake area also needs a range of housing types to match the needs of people at various stages of their lives. Next Step Meeting the housing needs of the lake area is a complex and difficult imdertaking that may most successfully be accomplished through cooperative efforts among the lake area cities, A recent example of the benefits of cooperation relates to the City's efforts to determine the types of townhouse developments that would work best in the City. We are drawing on the experience of neighboring cities to identify quality, successful townhouse developments and quality developers. ¥ i* • • Request for Council Action continued Page 2 June 11,1999 Summary of May 20,1999 Lake Area Housing Workshop The final element of the housing workshop was a discussion of where the cities go from here, and whether cities were interested in participatmg in a cooperative etfort to meet the housing needs oi d ; lake area. A suggested next step was that each city detemdne its willingness to participate in a housing subcommittee to address whether or how cities can work together to meet the housing needs of the lake area. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion indicating the City's support for, and participation on, a lake area housing subcommittee to determine how cooperative efforts can best be used to address lake area housing needs. I k CODNCH ^*c£TlNO JUN \ 4 1999 (^11 Y or UMONU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 9,1999 ITEM NO: ^ / Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Title City Clerk Adminbtrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Fee Schedule Amendment - Ordinance At their May 24, 1999 meeting. Council adopted Ordinance #188, 2nd Series approving the 1997 Uniform Building Code fee schedule, and directed staff to prepare an amendment of the 1999 Orono Fee Schedule to reflect an increase of approximately 11% in building permit fees from the 1994 Uniform Building Code fee schedule . Attached is the proposed ordinance reflecting the changes in permit fees related to the 1997 Uniform Building Code fee schedule. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached ordinance amending the 1999 Orono Fee Schedule to reflect an increase of approximately 11% in building permit fees per the 1997 Uniform Building Code fee schedule. ORDINANCE NO., 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 181,2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1999 FEE SCHEDULE The Citv Council of Orono ordains: Ordinance No. 181, 2nd Series adopted December 14, 1998, and entitled "An Ordinance Adopting the 1999 Fee Schedule" is amended to read: Application Type rONSTRUCTlON PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES BUILDING PERMIT Minimum Fee Normal Fee Plan Review Fee: Commercial RETAINING WALLS (in excess of 42" also multiple tiered walls that exceed 42" and not located in lakeshore protected area) DOCKS - COMMERCIAL Fee Applicable Code Section $?4 tOOS23.50 (Ord. 216) (per +994 1997 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) (per +9941222 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) $2+.06 $23.50 minimum (per 4994 1997 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) Per+994 1997 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule SIGNS Permanent Per +994 1997 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule FiRE PROTECTION Commercial Fire Alarm CONTRACTUAL IrlSPECTION SERVICE Plan Review Charge Per 1222 UBC Schedule Rnr/nnc Rg+edule Per 1997 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule This ordinance becomes effective after its passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 14th day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 1 of 1 cniiMoii Mci^iNO JUN 1 4 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION cu Y Uh OHONO DATE; June 11, 1999 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Carol Hansing Resignation from Part-Time Police Secretary Position Cnrol Hansing has resigned from her position as part-time Secretary in the Orono Police Department, after 19 years of dedicated service, effective June 11, 1999. Carol was presented with the attached Ceitificatc of Appreciation at a reception on Friday, June 11. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Carol Hansing's resignation from her position as part-time Secretary in the Orono Police Department effective June 11,1999. 1 . CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION IN RECOGNITION OF CAROL HANSING'S 19 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY OF ORONO AND THE ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Carol Hansing has served the City of Orono and the Orono Police Department for 19 years; and WHEREAS, her years of service have been marked by a commitment to service and a willingness to contribute extra time and effort when needed. The City of Orono does hereby express its sincere appreciation to Carol Hansing for COUNCIL MEETING JUN 1 4 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION v;n t ur unui^u DATE: June 11,1999 ITEM NO = Dcimrtiueut Appruval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Auiuiuistrator RevieweJ:Ageuda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Steve Weekman Resignation from the Position of On-Site Septic Manager Resolution Steve Weekman has resigned from his position as On-Site Septic Manager effective June 18,1999 to take a position with a larger city. A resolution recognizing Steve for his 9 years of dedicated service to Orono is attached for Council adoption. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the resignation of Steve Weekman from his position as On-Site Septic Manager effective June 18,1999, and to adopt the attached resolution recognizing Steve for his 9 years of dedicated service to the City. . E . i . t . i / fc. * A RESOUTION OF APPRECIATION TO STEVE WECKMAN FOR DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY OF ORONO WHEREAS, Steve Weckman has served the City of Orono as On-Site Septic Manager for nine years; and WHEREAS, his years with the City have been marked by a commitment to service and a dedication to environmental protection; and WHEREAS, Steve has earned the respect of those in his field as well as the friendship of his co-workers; and WHEREAS, Steve is leaving the City to pursue further career opportunities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL'v ’ED, that the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby express its sincere appreciation to Steve Weckman for his dedicated service to the City, and does highly commend him foi* the manner in which he has earned out his duties and responsibilities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council extends to Steve its best wishes for success in his future endeavors. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 14th day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COf iNCii MJ?ETINQ JUN 1 4 1999 CU Y Uh UHOfYO DATE: June 11,1999 ITEM NO: ^ ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Tide City Administrator Adminbtrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Appointment of Don pyrnateer, Jr. to Temporary Building Inspector Position Bruce Vang, the City’s full-time Building Inspector, has been on a leave from tlie City to deal with some personal affairs. Bruce has now indicated he will not be returning to hir- position with the City. The City has begun the process of hiring a full-time Building Inspector. However, the building inspection workload requires the City hire a temporary Building Inspector for the interim period prior to the hiring of a rull-time Building Inspector. Don Palmateer was a candidate for the Assistant Zoning Administrator position in the spring of 1998. The interview panel felt that, although he did not have the full qualifications for the Assistant Zoning Administrator position, he appeared to be a good potential candidate for a Building Inspector position. Mr. Palmateer was recently contacted to determine his interest in serving as a temporary Building Inspector for the City. He has indicated he is interested in the temporary Building Inspector position. Mr. Palmateer has an extensive construction background and has completed significant coursework related to building inspection. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the appointment of Don Palmateer, Jr. to the temporary Building Inspector position at the Level 7, Step 1 pay rate of $16.00 per hour effective June IS, 1999. C0(JMCII mpetinq REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JUN 1 4 1999 I f or unUNU DATE: June 11, 1999 ITEM NO; iiic 11, lyyy Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City AdminisUator's Report Item Description: Appointment of Kristine Jensen to the Position of Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner I Staff have completed the selection procei s to fill the position of Assistant Zoning Administrator/ Planner I. Making the appointment to this position will bring the Zoning and Planning staffing level to full strength. The top candidate for the position is Kristine Jensen. Kristine is a native of Minnesota with advanced degree coursework in Urban Planning from Mankato State University. Kristine has two years of experience as a planner in the City of Matteson, Illinois, a small community that is struggling to preserve its small-town character in the midst of booming development in surrounding suburbs. It is recommended Kristine Jensen be appointed to the position of Assistant Zoning Administrator/ Planner I at the Level 6, Step 2 salary of $32,629.00, effective Tuesday, June 15,1999. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the appointment of Kristine Jensen to the position of Assistant Zoning .A.dministrator.^lanner I at the Level 6, Step 2 salary of $32,629.00, effective Tuesday. June 15. 1999. 1 ; REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COMMr:ii meeting JUN ^ 4 1999 t ur UHONO DATE: June 9,1999 ITEM NO: ^ (b Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse City Administrator's Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Appointment of Part-Time Police Records Clerk During the leave of absence of the City's full-time Police Records Clerk, the City hired Adrienne Madson to fill in on a temporary basis through a temporary employment agency. She has done an outstanding job during this time. When Carol Hansing resigned and the part-time Police Records Clerk position became available, Adrienne was the top candidate. The City’s contract with the temporary employment agency requires that, if the City hires a person during or immediately following the placement of that person with the City, the City will pay a fee of $1,000 to the temporary agency. Given the cost of advertising for the position and the amount of staff time required to conduct a selection process, the $1,000 fee is a reasonable amount. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the appointment of Adrienne Madson to the position of Part-Time Police Records Cleric at a pay rate of $10.54 per hour, in the Level 3 part-time position pay range, effective June 7, 1999; and to authorize the payment of the $1,000 fee to the temporary employment agency. I JUN 1 A W99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION u» t unui'.u DATE: June 11,1999 ITEM NO: Department Approval: k\UkU^ iW«A Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: I ^ A Agenda Section: K . W « 4% Report Item Description: Appointment of Wendy Bottenberg to Zoning Intern Position The City Council has not taken formal action to approve the appointment of Wendy Bottenberg to the Zoning Intern position. Staff is requesting that Wendy be appointed to die Zoning Intern position for a six-month period at a rate of $10.00 per hour. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the appoinhnent of Wendy Bottenberg to a six-month Zoning Intern position at a rate of $10.00 per hour. ; Mf^GTlNQ JUN 1 4 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Mf unuriU DATE; June 9,1999 ITEM NO: ^ 8 Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Promotion of Paul Weinberger to Zoning Administrator/Planner III Position Paul Weinberger was hired in the spring of 1998 as Assistant Zoning Administrator. When the City's Planner/Zoning Administrator resigned in the spring of 1999, Paul took on the added workload and responsibility. Paul's performance over the past year, and particularly in the past two months, has been exceptional, and he has demonstrated his ability to handle higher level duties. It is recommended Paul Weinberger be promoted to the position of Zoning Administrator/Planner III and placed into the Level 9, Step 2 salary of $40,920.00, effective June 14,1999. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the promotion of Paul Weinberger to the position of Zoning Administrator/ Planner III, at the Level 9, Step 2 pay rate of $40,920.00, effective June 14,1999. -'i COUNC.ii k*«=F=TING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JUN 1 4 1999 11 ur UriUDtU DATE: June 10, 1999 ITEM NO = Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: Ordinance Revision Maintenance of Private Property Agenda Section: Administration We have experienced problems in enforcing our City code in regards to maintenance of private property. Code Section 9.55 concerning maintenance of propert}' docs not contain a provision that allows the City to complete required work such as noxious weed control, lawn mowing and dead tree removal and assess the costs to the property owner. We recently took a property owner to court to force the removal of dead trees that were a safety hazard. The City’s prosecuting attorney recommended that an easier method to complete this process would have assessment authority for these items in our City code. The court system is not very interested in dealing with these types ot mmor cases, as they waste valuable time and money. I The City already has special assessment authority in Section 9.50 of the City code. This section deals with the removal of junk cars, furniture and appliances. This section has been used many times for the removal of junk cars. This is used as a last resort after several requests to the property owner for removal of the junk cars. A local towing company is contacted to tow the car and the towing bill is asi^ssed back to the property owner as a special assessment. The City also uses special assessments to collect unpaid sewer and water bills. We are recommending that "Section 9.55 - Maintenance of Private Property" of the City code be amended to add special assessment language. This code section is not part of the zoning code so Planning Commission action or a public hearing is not required. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of the attached amendment to Section 9.55 Orono City Code to allow the use of special assessments to recover City costs related to enforcement of the provisions in this section. }' !-• ORDINANCE NO.^ SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.55 MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY TO INCLUDE PRO^TSIONS TO *XLOW THE USE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS TO RECOVER COSTS RELATING TO THE CORRECTION OF VIOLATIONS TO THIS CODE SECTION The City Council of Orono ordains as follows; Section 1. Section 9.55, Maintenance of Private Property is amended to add the following language to the section. Subdivision 3. Any violation of this section is declared to be a nuisance and public safety and welfare hazard and upon seven days written notice to the owner, as shown by the records of the office of the County Auditor, of private premises on which such material is found or any conditions in violation of this code section exist, the City may remove the same or correct any conditions in violation, and certify the cost of such removals or corrections as any other special assessment. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be published in THE LAKER/PIONEER newspaper and shall be effective upon publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at its regular meeting held the 14th day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, Deputy Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 1 of 1 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COMMOil k*PETlNG JUN 1 4 1999 DATE: June 9,1999 ITEM NO; 3 0 Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: DNR Interest in Tax Forfeit Parcel Adjacent to Wood-Rill SNA The DNR recently contacted the City regarding whether the City would be willing to release a 5.7- acre tax forfeit parcel adjacent to the Wood-Rill SNA for acquisition by the DNR. The parcel is located at the northeast comer of the intersection of the Luce Line Trail and Highway 12 (see the attached map). The parcel has 3 acres of dry land adjacent to the Luce Line Trail (and to a small portion of Highway 12) and 2.7 acres of wetland in the southwestern portion of the parcel. Staff has indicated to the DNR that if the City has an interest in releasing the parcel, it would be subject to assurance that the parcel will not be used to create an access to Wood-Rill from Highway 12. The DNR has indicated it has no intent to create an access at Highway 12, and intends to retain the parcel in its current state. The Council may have other restrictions to place on the use of the parcel if it is to be released to the DNR. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to indicate whether the Council is interested in releasing a tax forfeit parcel adjacent to the Wood-Rill SNA to the DNR, with conditions if desired. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COitMru MCETINQ JUN 1 ^ W99 cutot^ariONO DATE: June 9,1999 ITEM NO: 3 / Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: Amendment to Admini^ative Policy Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report The City's Administrative Policy provides that when a regular full-time employee with a minimum of three years of service resigns in good standing, the employee will receive payment of accrued vacation to a maximum of 240 hours and one-third of the employee’s accumulated sick leave as severance pay. The City's current Compensation Policy enables regular part-time employees to earn sick leave and vacation benefits. However, the Administrative Policy is silent as to any payout of accumulated sick leave as severance pay to regular part-time employees. It is recommended the policy be clarified to provide that all regular employees with a minimum of three years of service who resign in good standing shall receive payment of accrued vacation and one-third of their accumulated sick leave as severance pay. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve an amendment to Section 318. Severance of the City's Administrative Policy to provide that all regular employees with a minimum of three years of service who resign in good standing shall receive payment of accmed vacation to a maximum of 240 hours, and one-third of their accumulated sick leave as severance pay. COUMcn ^'EETING JUN 1 4 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION un t ur utiUNO DATE; June 11,1999 ITEM NO; 3 ^ Department Approval; Name RonMoorse Title Citv Administrator Administrator Reviewed;Agenda Section; City Administrator's Report Item Description; Request for Replacement of Microfiche Reader/Printer « 44 i kiiUW IC n fUr% r^1r»»*1r ronnr»cf;»^rr nrM-imvnl nf fhf* r^rilarprTIPnt of the microfichC UWilwLl Id cl iliW444K^ A4 W44A »**«P '•••’,/ w.-.-- * 1 A 4 reader/printer in the Administrative Department. The current reader/printer is 11 years old and cannot print adequate copies of many existing microfiche documents. Because the City makes substantial use of microfiche records, it is important an adequate microfiche reader/printer is available. It is recommended the Bell and Howell ABR 2000 Bond Reader/Printer be purchased at a cost of $2,913.00. Because this expenditure was not budgeted, a budget adjustment is necessary in the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; Motion to approve the purchase of a Bell and Howell ABR 2000 Bond Reader/Printer at a cost of $2,913.00, and to amend the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund budget to reflect the expenditure. ■i To; From: Date: Subject: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Lin Vee, City Clerk April 19, 1999 r^uiiuiu Request for Purchase of Replacement Microfiche Reader/Printer Background The maintenance agreement has expired on our Bell & Howell, Compact 4000 microfiche reader/printer and we must determine if it should be renewed. It was purchased in January of 1988 for $2,917.00, with a projected use of 10 years. Our maintenance contract is $389.00 per year for emergency service only. The prints produced from the machine have been of very poor quality in the last few years. Some of this may be attributed to poor quality in the original microfiche image. The service technician has indicated that replacing a number of parts on our existing machine will produce a better print, but was unable to guarantee that the prints would be "as good as a new machine". Until the parts are actually ordered and installed, there would be no way to determine that replacing the parts would solve the current problem of poor print quality. Although document imaging and computerized filing is the direction that the City will be moving towards in records management, it will be several years before a system is in place and microfiche files converted to computerized images. Our existing machine is 10 years old. It would be reasonable to expect a new machine to provide at least 10 years of service, while replacing parts on our existing machine would be less predictable. Replacement Machine Last December Rick Verio of Bell & Howell demonstrated an ABR-2000 Bond Reader/Printer in our oflBce. The ABR-2000 is similar to our existing machine and produced significantly better prints when compared to the same print on our existing machine. Attached are sample documents to show the difference in print quality. Exhibit A is fi'om our existing machine; Exhibit B is from the ABR- 2000. Cost Comparison Attached are quotes from two companies. Bell & Howell and Document Management Solutions. Since Bell & Howell holds the government contract, their price is significantly less than Document Management Solutions for a comparable machine. A new machine is estimated to save 3 '/a - 4 cents per copy because of improved technology. The plain paper, dry toner printing process requires fewer supplies and produces higher quality prints. Following is a summary of estimated costs. Replacement parts for our existing machine $ 800.00 Bell & Howell-ABR-2000 Bond Reader/Printer $2,913.00 Document Management Solutions-Alos Z40 Reader/Printer $4,095.00 Purchase of Replacement Microfiche Reader/Printer April 19,1999 Page 2 There is no charge for delivery from Bell & Howell, The warranty on a new machine is extended 90 day-, for a total of 180 days. A maintenance contract v.’ould then be rerivired fr»r an annual service check and any emergency repairs for a fee of $387.00, Request for Purchase I would like to request the purchase of the ABR-2000 Reader/Printer at a cost of $2,913.00. A maintenance agreement is also appropriate after the 180 day warranty expires at a cost of $387.00 per year. The maintenance agreement on our current machine should not be renewed. There is no trade-in value for our current machine. Bell & Howell would take the machine or we could keep it. We may want to consider adding it to the next police auction. s 4* # I ft u E .-ILL -rVlSlD 38-ORONO ^ vu L77-3 _______3._ JACK c .lAX^rL. *-T AL 001*UL.’. N •-£ ri.rt<..- 12cw :»•> Th _____________ K0o^U 7 ; i\»l •• i* L- , T‘.A » v sy.AL______________________lit.900 7 L?b»* caCISs TAA CR z CiJ.**.'.} ~ i' Tc.t»tir 34t400 in 7j»o «> _._...«_ >r.—. •• <« lt237«33 _______________ 325.00 35.15 .. s^.T.o.e**______________ -177-3F.R A-iC I_i ;:. C >-; i v.m_________ ‘990C5i6j ‘0203 099 COKB* F3ANCIS 0 10 ________i6f3eo ______ ••• ••.; . ^ • '.. _ 12 64. N-. y h ir.M. Ci________ MOLND 5 uzit T«^A hCmESIEAD • -1 • 4t752 T 8 5362 cGNOS AND If TcRcST SI-A 1M<- ASTCLi-l ____2.14.. 3 9_______ .. 20.3_<t?5 , -'Cr' w f >^ • »4» • • « •• • 491.69 221.27____ 13.97 263.95 54e.34**„ %T •• f A . *• •• —»• •• • • • 7-.^ *•’•»# rP3NCii G c.f. i 99CC3IL jC2C> CCMcS KA'.Cli - ltO*» Sj ’•Ih i' • G- ^'OUNC O V1 •'» T •• A 53f2 Sr A IMS' l-7^Li.-i_. ............... l^,7.H~f 54.65 ••• 3t465 ••• • •*v s M • • . O « • •*. lt386 147.49 54.65 . 202.14«* H L 0U7aIn i’*L C2160l2c5 4u0 MCFA}<0 L. lorr.l'» 1216 no -►iv» MIX/NO LOIS .4 A'.l- iJ 1.'/. •• *• • f • • * • • : 4 7 L» ^. Ai.:.A L 277-3 ^ • • 27*405 i.O«. V 2J,»2 ii»*2 I. I . jt n t '*t ' I I -w » I : T I.. i /• I :.- I • ; I ' / »*•** S4c .00 32 5.uO i 3l ».VV ! SA^TU l- lA^nDn^ii-i —■—— ‘38-ORONOt" %-„ $■ •!'"'''-^S*'¥5«siu^ — _______ ii:.- s¥'*’v- 'V' ^®»«?on *:k , peVhehmer ;..,Vv - ... -tiK -------^-Trido^—________— * ■------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . . --------------- —- - * . «* . •>%■. ., • • :. V lots 7 8 ANC 9 ’' ^?5{S!. rA^‘'CR8 .; BONOS ANO interest -1^________947,68 -.Ilf 960-------------li23t,.53 325.00 35.15 / • V*. -----------♦♦ combsm =rancis "o ■i^^^^^oBiHlARfCea ,277-3 . . £•;- 099 V- mound /: % ••• ■ r^;: •■ .,> ..s . ir •••■ • a€ _ V ft i *. •, 491.69 ^22JU27 ••t . k •. ^** • '/• *. * ‘*.X • .-£gAN(^j^ 0 C0M6S cfTAl 99005100 0205------------------ C0.MBS FRAUCIS U OR {•■^-26’3l‘‘9i::'’-.V^^^^ ?S'. • —:-5.4J.A4**-- 099 277.TJ________ 3f465 • • ...vv„.; ■•.I.'.' 'V . . s • ^ r . ; •.. .V? ••.'. ft • 147.49 54..6^. • •* •• • * « /• *S.{# ^:-.>r , 4'^ • •■ •., t *■.'*• •,* • ', *•.-■ ■ .■■•■.■•■v.% ;• • ^..... ■...■■■■ ■= • V . *• • • •*_ • '^ • . • X . . . _ .1 • * .. " • .‘./ " "T- ^^ BpfiJDS A^p fj rrn rW * £*£{" 9f 162 V ■ •> ;’*f> 'iT*’.. • • “ • •• .. • v-v: : ■■ • •** * • ;* .*.•.. J i •*. ****‘^*'i ^»*‘ ’ * - * * ^-------—y- ..; • ./;. 9^ 8 •00 * ' • . “1 • "948.00 325.00 26.93 - CnYOFORONO PLAN A Reader/Piinter <A ->An nn1 AT5T> .ortnn x>nxTn 'otr A'ntrD rotJTKrf'^o Includes: 12” X12” Screen Negative Imaging Unit ( good for 30,000 copies ) Fiche Carrier Choice of Two Lens (23.5X and 29X prism lens ) $.025 per copy print cost or les:* Orgaiuc BasiKi Drum and Supplies LESS: GOVERNMENT DISCOUNT -S 1.347.00 NET EQUIPMENT INVESTMENT $2,913.00 WARRANTY Nine^ days on all parts, labor, and adjustments and an EXTRA ninety days if maintenance contract is purchased. PRODUCT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 1 PLAN A / ABR-2000 BOND READER/PRINTER Based on zero to 15,000 Copies Includes all service calls and one scheduled inspection $^00 3?^'* SUPPLIES 1 ABR'2000 Negative Toner ( 3 cartridges per carton ) 1 ABR-2000 Negative Starter (1 bag; good for 30,000 copies) $34.65 $34.65 TEARMS Net 30 days DELIVERY Two weeks on average (No cost for delivery / savings of $125.00) \ - % I i i ! I I i *•i M I I I I I I I I iRECOMMENDED EQUIPMENT •• .*: •City of Orono Lin Vee » • 11-10-98 ♦ • Tte.ms for Quotations Quantity I Tnit Price Alos Z40 Reader/Printer To Include: Base Unit, 18x - 36x Zoom lens. Image rotation. Toner, Spare lamp $ 4,095.00 Shipping & Handling, Inst^ation & Training 1 $ 250.00 Less Trade-In Allowance: Bell & Howell Compaq 4000 Reader/Printer 1 < $ 375.00 > 4 ------—"' REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING JUN 1 4 1999 Cll t ui- unOMU DATE: June 10,1999 ITEM NO: 33 Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval Garbage & Refuse Collector's License 1.FraT>' 31'’okowiak Blackowiak & Son Sanitation & Rolloff Service 1155 Sunnyfield Road North Mound, MN 55364 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. \ , • «• • • • • *• * ♦ CITiT OP' ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bayr MN 55323 473-7357 License Year ^ Date Received Fee Paid_ __Initials garbage & REFUSE COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and herewith makes application for a license to do so. Address- - -.g^^getj- - - - -^- - - - - -(City) (State) (Zip Code) Business Phone Number A72-3398- - - - - - - - - - - - - Applicant's Name Frank Blackowiak Address 1155 Sunnyfield Rd. N.Mound (Street) Phone Number 472-2977 (City) _ uLXL-^ ^ . — — (State) (Zip Code) Check One:Individual X _ Partnership Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono —I- - - - - - - Corporation Description of Vehicles (attached list if more): Loaded Loaded . j year Mfor. Gross Wt. .Rear Axle Wt. Size/Yards_License Number (SEE ATTACHED) 0 o'^al IHTof City served All of Orono except FerndaU Schedule of Collection charges/ dates (SEE ATTACHEp2 Approximate number of customers in Orono --------------------------------- Location of dumping area Hennepin Energy^Resource _Co jInJjS ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: T^aTtheliwner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees LTSxes require/by law. The above information is correct. 4/19/99_______ — .j -i. Date.Applicant ____________________________________________ jU U / .c/ ______!—11- ^i^ur?^Jty dfiSgitt' Date 2 Jun 1999 Med 10:23 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Mumber En^loyee Name Check Number 046045 046045 JOHNSON, MARY ANN Totals Check Number 046045 Check Number 046046 046046 KASEMAN, CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 046046 Check Number 046047 046047 M00R5B, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046047 Check Number 0460«a8 046048 VBB, LINDA S. Totals Check Number 046048 Check Number 046049 046049 KUEHN, THOMAS M. Totals Check Number 046049 Check Number 046050 046050 OLSON, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046050 Check Number 046051 046051 PETTIT, SANDRA K. Totals Check Number 0^6nsi Check Number 046052 046052 ANDERSON, BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 046052 Check Number 046053 046053 BOBZIEN, SUB A. Totals Check Number 046053 Check Date 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-93 02-Jun-99: - 02-Jun-99 C2-JUH-99 02-JUX1-99 Page 1 Check Amount 656.10 656.10 707.73 707.73 1,578.85 1,578.85 1,092.29 1,092.29 1,005.84 1,005.84 21.46 21.46 772.71 772.71 648.00 648.00 772.57 772.57 3‘! »/iq^NQ .jyN 14 1999 n UF ORONO 2 JUn 1999 Ned 10:23 M Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046054 046054 BORIS, SCOTT W Totals Check Number 046054 Check Number 046055 046055 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. Totals Check Number 046055 Check Number 046056 04bU5b CKESWiCK, OAiti' B. Totals Check Number 046056 Check Number 046057 046057 CORNICE, JAMBS L. Totals Check Number 046057 Check Number 046050 046058 DBMBOOSKI, JAY C. Totals Check Number 046058 Check Number 046059 046059 ERICKSON, KURT R Totals Check Number 046059 Check Number 046060 \ 046060 PARNIOK, CORREY L. Totals Check Number 046060 Check Refister City of Orono Page 2 Check Number 046061 046061 PISCHENICH, DAN T. Totals Check Number 046061 Check Number 046062 046042 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K Totals Check Number 046062 Check Date 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-JUn-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 Check Amount 1,094.34 1,094 *>4 211.01 211.01 1,484.73 1,<84.73 1,598.22 1,598.22 1,717.39 1,717.39 1,248.91 1,248.91 1,347.26 1,347.26 1,232.81 1,232.81 1,116.36 1,116.36 Check Number 046063 2 Jun 1999 Hed 10:23 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Nunber En^loyee Name Check Number 046063 046063 KANSING, CAROL J. Totals Check Number 046063 Check Number 046064 046064 J0K:;30N« JEFFREY Totals Check Number 046064 Check Number 046065 046065 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 046065 Check Number 046066 046066 MCNALLY, STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 046066 Check Number 046067 046067 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L. Totals Check Number 046067 Check Number 046068 046068 N0R0NCZYN5KI, JAMBS Totals Check Number 046068 Check Number 046069 046069 PBRSSLL, WILLIAM R. Totals Check Number 046069 Check Number 046070 046070 SCHOBNHOFF, JOHN B. Totals Check Number 046070 Check NusdMr 046071 046071 TOMOSaC, LAWRENCE P. Totals Check Number 046071 Check Number 046072 u Check Date 02-Jun-99 02-JUH-99 02-Jun-99 02-JUn-99 02-Jun-99 \ 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-JUn-99 Page 3 Check Amount 456.84 456.84 466.97 466.97 1,184.86 1,184.86 292.28 292.28 1,051.93 1,051.93 1,578.96 1«S78.96 101.86 101.86 1,396.37 1,396.37 501.83 501.83 ■V * f 2 Jun 1999 Ned 10:21 AM Check Register City o£ Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046072 046072 TOMCZYK. MARK N. Totals Check 046072 Check Number 046073 046073 NITTKE« ANTHONY A. Totals Check Number 046073 Check Number 046074 046074 HOECHST, ROBYN A. Totals Check Number 046074 Check lAudber 046075 046075 KOCZOR« JASON R. Totals Check Number 046075 Check Number 046076 046076 BOTTENBERO, WENDY C. Totals Check Number 046076 Check Number 046077 046077 QAFFRON« MICHAEL P. Totals Qieck Number 046077 Check Number 046076 046078 QAPPA, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 043078 Check Number 046079 046079 OMAN, LYLE B. Totals Check Number 046079 Qieck Number 046060 046080 VANG, BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 046080 a^^ck Number 046081 Check Date 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-JUn-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 Page 4 Check Amount 1,258.74 1,258.74 1,034.2J 1,034.25 617.06 617.06 432.09 432.09 749.93 749.93 1,161.19 1,161.19 1,565.93 1,565.93 248.55 248.55 993.71 993.71 > 2 Jun 1999 Ned 10:23 AH Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046081 046081 NBCKMAN, STEPHEN J. Tctttlj Check 046031 Check Number 046082 046082 NE1NBBRGER« PAUL E. Totals Check Number 046082 Check Number 046083 046083 BRINKKAUS« JOHN F. Totals Check Nuinber 146083 Check Number 046084 046084 DBBABIB, DONALD L. Totals Check Number 046084 Check Number 046085 046085 GREGORY* JAMES D. Totals Check Number 046085 Check Number 046086 046086 HANSEN* STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 046086 Check Number 046087 046087 OBBRAIGNER* SCOTT G. Totals Check Number 046087 Check Number 046088 046088 OBRIEN* RANDY L. Totals Check Number 046088 Check Number 046G89 046089 PALMER* GREGORY A Totals Check Number 046080 Check Number 046090 Check Date 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 Page 5 Check Amount 70.19 7C.19 802.42 802.42 1,11**.06 1*115.06 882.91 882.91 590.30 590.30 649.78 649.78 619.56 619.56 221.20 221.20 658.70 658.70 '4 i r 2 Jun 1999 Wed 10:23 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046090 046090 RATHBUN, BARRY J. Totals Check 045090 Check Number 046091 046091 SKREEN, DALE S. Totals Check Number 046091 Check Number 046092 046092 ABRAHAMSON, FRED N. Totals Check Number 046092 Check Number 046093 046093 ALLEN, MICHAEL J. Totals Check Number 046093 Check Number 046094 046094 BLAIR, JANIS A. Totals Check Number 046094 Check Number 046095 046095 DOCKEN, THOMAS W. Totals Check Number 046095 Check Number 046096 046096 OAS, DANIEL 0. Totals Check Number 046096 Check Number 046097 046097 PETERSON, JACK W. Totals Check Number 046097 Check Number 046096 046098 RAICHS, VICTORIA H. Totals Check Number 046096 Check Number 046099 Check Date 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-JUT.-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 Page 6 Check Amount 1,121.59 1,121.59 766.15 766.19 258.64 258.64 55.08 55.06 155.13 155.13 467.83 467.83 271.94 271.94 466.72 466.72 152.77 • • m m m 152.77 i 2 aun 1999 Wed 10:23 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 7 Check Number Employee Name Check Date Check Amount Check Number 046099 046099 ROSS. JOHN A.02-Jun-99 Totals Check Number 046099 69.53 69.53 Check Number 046100 046100 STEFFBNHAGEN. RONALD E.02-Jun-99 Totals Check Number 046100 1.094.11 1.094.11 Grand Total 43.911.58 11 Jun 1999 Fri 1:57 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59006 59006 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 02-Jun-99 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Totals Check Number 59006 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Number 59007 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OP LAKES 59007 59007 59007 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Totals Check Number 59007 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Check Number 59008 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. 59C08 02-Jun-99 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO Totals Check Number 59008 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO Check Number 59009 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 59009 02-Jun-99 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Totals Check Number 59009 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Check Number 59010 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 59010 02-Jun-99 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Totals Check Number 59010 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Check Number 59011 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT 59011 02-Jun-99 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Totals Check Number 59011 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Check Number 59012 MN DEPT OP REVENUE 59012 02-Jun-99 MN DEPT OP REVENUE Totals Check Number 59012 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Check Number 59013 MN MUTUAL LIFE 59013 02-Jun-99 MN MUTUAL LIFE Totals Check Number 59013 KN MUTUAL LIFE Check Number 59014 KN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP 59014 02-Jun-99 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP Totals Check Number 59014 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP Transaction Amount 7,339.00 7,339.00 3,337.90 3,337.90 8,415.49 15,091.29 800.68 800.68 275.00 275.00 0.00 0.00 179.51 179.51 3,524.09 3,524.09 703.00 703.00 227.00 227.00 Page 1 Comments SAVINGS W/H k TRANSFERRED FICA k MEDICARE W/H FICA,MEDCR CITY SHARE FEDERAL WITHHOLDING DEFERRED COMP W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H UNION DUES WH SKREEN •0010755*'Y3 STATE TAX W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H i IX Jun 1999 Fri 1:57 PM Check Register City o£ Orono Page 2 Check Number Date Name Check Number 59014 MN STATE RBTIRtMENT-DEP COMP Check Number 59015 PEBSCO/OBRA 59015 02-Jun-99 PEBSCO/OBRA Totals Check Number 59015 PEBSCO/OBRA Check Number 59016 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 59016 02-Jun-99 PEBSCO/US CONF OP MAYORS Totals Check Nuclicr 5901C rcccco/us ccrrF of mayors Check Number 59017 PERA 59017 59017 02-Jun-99 02-Jun-99 PERA PERA Totals Check Number 59017 PERA Check Number 59010 ONITEfci WAY 59018 02-Jun-99 UNITED WAY Totals Check Number 59010 UNITED WAY Grand Total Transaction Amount Comments 290.98 290.98 OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H 2,421.50 USCM DEFERRED COMP W/H 2,421.50 4,577.09 6,095.37 PERA EMPLOYEE W/H PERA CITY SHARE 10,672.46 31.00 31.00 CHARITY DONATIONS W/H 41,555.51 11 Jun 1999 Pri 1:4S PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59020 59020 59020 59020 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUB 00-Jun-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 00-Jun-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 00-Jun-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE Totals Check Number 59020 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE Check Number 59021 ALL STAR ELECTRIC 59021 io-Jun-99 ALL STAR ELECTRIC Totals Check Number 59021 ALL STAR ELECTRIC Check Number 59022 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 59022 lO-Jun-99 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING Totals Check Number 59022 ALLEGRA PRINT k IMAGING Check NurJter 59023 ANCHOR PAPER 59023 OO-Jun-99 ANCHOR PAPER Totals Check Number 59023 ANCHOR PAPER Check Number 59024 ASFLUNDH COFFEE 59024 59024 10-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 ASPLUNDH COFFEE ASPLUNDH COFFEE Totals Check Number 59024 ASPLUNDH COFFEE Check Number 59025 AT a T - 59025 59025 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 AT a T AT a T Totals Check Number 59025 AT a T - Check Number 59026 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 59026 59026 59026 59026 O0-Jun-99 lo-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES Totals Check Number SDC26 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES Check Number 59027 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 59027 lO-Jun-99 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF Totals Check Number 59027 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF Transaction Amount 356.61 10.72 10.73 394.06 400.42 400.42 722.07 722.07 611.52 611.52 152.00 150.00 310.00 30.52 30.13 60.65 33.64 152.07 19.63 19.64 224.93 60.64 60.64 Page 1 Comments CELL PHONE SERVICES UTILITY ON CALL PHONE UTILITY ON CALL PHONE GOLF GLOVES BUSINESS CARDS PAPER COFFEE COFFEE« SUGAR LD a FED CHARGES LD a FED CHARGES CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE PHONE SERVICE PHONE SERVICE PHONE SERVICE HOT DOGS, HAMBRGERS ‘ 4 11 Jun 1999 Fri 1>46 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Check Number Date Name Check Number 59028 59026 BERETTA USA 00-Jun-99 BERETTA USA Totals Check Number 59028 BERETTA USA Check Number 59029 BLACKOWIAK & SON 59029 59029 59029 59029 08-Jun-99 08-Jun-99 O0-Jun-99 08-Jun-99 BLACKOWIAK & SON BLACKOWIAK k SON BLACKOWIAK k SON BLACKOWIAK k SON Totals Che^k Number 59029 BLACKOWIAK k SON Check Number 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59'“? ? 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59333 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC. lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 10-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 10- Jun-99 11- Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 11 Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONF9TROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTt . V BONESi‘k*A^ BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROC BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTROO BONESTRCD ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE R0SE'"9 ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENE ROSENS ROSENE ROSENE k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. r hCQfsr k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. ii ASSOC. I. ASSOC. Transaction Amount 24.00 24.00 105.45 86.27 70.90 36.17 3C6.79 2.002.65 1,050.75 201.25 2,222.23 895.93 1.014.00 1.040.00 1.870.00 4,042.54 1,751.10 971.03 1.724.68 786.43 432.23 3.267.25 1.604.00 4.032.69 1,213.34 405.15 354.75 129.00 541.20 5.310.66 51.00 563.00 1.013.25 1.032.00 100.00 64.50 1.973.00 134.67 100.00 32.25 1,713.40 1.270.00 154.25 Comments RECOIL SPRING i GARBAGE CH/PW </99 GARBAGE CH/PW 4/99 GARBAGE • PARKS 4/99 GARBAGE • GOLF 4/99 NAV WTR PLANT REHAB 2/99 EDGEWOOD HILLS SWR 2/99 HERITAGE SWR 2/99 LS »13 REHAB 2/99 I/I CASCO-PERHDALB AREA I/I vavftooi:; AREA ELECTRONIC MAPPING ELECTRONIC MAPPING NAV WTR PLANT REHAB 3/99 EOQHOOD HILLS SWR 3/99 LS 913 REHAB HAR 99 LS 913 REHAB GHT RFP lU I/I CASCO-FERNDALE I/I NAVARRE AREA CR15 TRAFFIC STIIDY 93 HEAD SWR PROJ-HAR 99 NAV WTR PLANT REHAB 4/99 EDGWOOD HILLS SWR 4/99 HERITAGE OR SWR 4/99 ORONO ORCHARD SWR 4/99 WEBBER HILLS SWR 4/99 I/I CASCO-FERNDALE AREA CRX5 TRAFFIC STUDY 94 HEAD SEWER PROJ 4/99 ELECTRONIC MAPPING ELECTRONIC NAPPING APPLICATIONS FEB 9, FEB COUNCIL HTGS WOOOHILL CC • ROAD OISPUT SAGA HILL PR - ACCESS MILEAGE FEB MARCH COUNCIL MIG8 DNR - STORM SWR GRANT HTG APPLICATIONS - MARCH SAGA HILL PK ACCESS DICKEY PARK EVALUATION L 11 Jun 1999 Fri 1x46 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 3 Check Number Date Name Check Number 59033 59033 590**3 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59033 59C33 59033 BONESTRCX) ll-Jun-99 li-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ROSENS k ASSOC. BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSENE BONESTROO ROSEITE k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. k ASSOC. r • Totals Check Number 59033 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC. Check Number 59034 BOYER FORD k TRUCK 59034 ll-Jun-99 BOYER FORD k TRUCK Totale Check Number 59034 BOYER FORD k TRUCK Transaction Amount Comments 367.00 25,743.07 100.00 96. /5 745.50 662.50 126.03 1,515.75 411.45 315.11 2,988.52 m , ^ r ^ FOX RIDGE SNR - MARCH ORONO ORCHARD SNR 33 APRIL COUNCIL MTGS TOWN LINE RD MTG BALDUR PK RD DRAINAGE STUBBS BAY RD-LAKE ACCESS MILEAGE k EXP APRIL APPLICATIONS - APRIL ANNUAL BRIDGE INSP 4/99 NLL/LLCC CLOSE-OUT FULLERTON SAN SNR APR 99 BALDUR PARK SNR APR 99 79,615.50 47,916.00 DUMP/PLOW TRUCK 47,916.00 Check Number 59035 BUDGET PRINTING 59035 lO-JUn-99 BUDGET PRINTING 8.85 SHIPPING CHGS 59035 lO-Jun-99 BUDGET PRINTING 141.84 COMP PLAN COVERS, INSERTS 59035 lO-JUn-99 BUDGET PRINTING 111.19 ENVELOPES 59035 lO-Jun-99 BUDGET PRINTING 35.15 SIGN 59035 lO-Jun-99 BUDGET PRINTING 534.21 GC TICKETS 59035 lO-Jun-99 BUDGET PRINTING 246.51 PHONE • LABELS 59035 lO-Jun-99 BUDGET POINTING 167.26 ACTIVITY LOG FORMS 59035 lO-Jun-99 BUDGET PRINTING 61.09 COLOR COPIES 59035 lO-Jun-99 BUDGET PRINTING 121.83 LBTTBRHBAD Totals Check Number S903S BUDGET PRINTING 1,427.93 Check Number 59037 CHUNKS LAKBSHORE AUTO 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORE AUTO 100.23 RED SIDE LIGHT 6179 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORE AUTO 164.10 OIL CHG, TRANS 8RV •182 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORE AUTO 53.79 CHBCK BRAKBS •181 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORE AUTO 156.96 BATTERY • 179 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORE AUTO 172.51 OIL, HITCH, TIRE • 178 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORE AUTO 62.50 RADAR PWR SUPPLY • 183 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORE AUTO 255.15 LEFT TAIL LGKT ASSEM • 179 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORE AUTO 43.05 OIL CHG • 184 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORB AUTO 62.50 lADAR PNR SUPPLY • 184 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORE AUTO 62.50 RiVDAR PNR SUPPLY • 185 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORB AUTO 173.05 riL,T ROD BND. ALGN 180 59037 06-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORB AUTO 57.58 CISCK BARKBS 181 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORB AUTO 378.17 UP SPD SSHS.SGL SITT 181 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKBSHORE AUTO 125.71 BATEERY 167 11 Jun 1999 Check Register Page Fri 1:46 PM City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 59037 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 59037 O0-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 51.01 OIL. FUSE 179 59037 08-Jun-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 32.21 OIL,103 57037 08-Ju;i-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 62.5C CHK ABS SYSTEM 13: 59037 O0-JUH-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 49.95 AC SERVICE 167 Totals Check Number 59U37 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Cfeeck Number 59030 CLASSIFIEDS 59030 O0-Jun-99 CLASSIFIEDS Totals Check Number 59030 classifieds Check Number 59039 CMI« INC. 59039 O0-Jun-99 CHI, INC. Totals Check Number 59039 CHI, INC. Check Number 59040 COFFIN k QRONBBRG INC. 59040 08-Jun-99 COFFIN fi GRONBERG INC. Totals Check Number 59040 coffin a gronberg inc. Check Number 59041 CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA GRP 59041 lO-Jun-99 CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA GRP Totals Check Number 59041 CONSTRUqriON MARKET DATA GRP Check Number 59042 CUMMINS ALLISON 59042 Oe-Jun-99 CUMMINS ALLISON Totals Check Number 59042 CUMMINS ALLISON Check Number 59043 CYS UNIFORMS 59043 59043 OB-Jun-99 O0-Jun-99 CYS UNIFORMS CYS UNIFORMS Totals Check Number 59043 CYS UNIFORMS Check Number 59044 DAKOTA CO. TECHNICAL COLLEGE 59044 S9044 O0-Jun-99 O0-Jun-99 DAKOTA CO. TECHNICAL COLLEGE DAKOTA CO. TECHNICAL COLLEGE Totals Check Number 59044 DAKOTA CO. TECHNICAL COLLEGE Check Number 59045 DCA 59045 oe-Jun-99 DCA 2«O04.27 32.00 32.00 01.00 01.00 96.00 96.00 191.40 191.40 276.85 276.85 273.35 68.70 342.05 170.00 170.00 340.00 151.20 ADV - POLICE CLERK MOUTHPIECES ELEVATIONS - FRNCH CRK ND ADV - STUBBS BAY CLSURB MAINT CONTRACT-SHREDDER JACKET - HOECHST SHIRTS - HOECHST DRIVING COURSE-FISCHENICH DRIVING COURSE-J JOHNSON .^DM FEE APRIL 99 i \ 11 Jun 1999 Pri 1:46 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number 59048 DEMBOUSKI, JAY 59048 08-Jun-99 DEMfiOUSKI, JAY Totals Check Number 59048 DBMBOOEKX« JAY Check Hunger 59049 DICKS AUTO DETAILING 5904>08-Jun-99 DICKS AUTO DETAILING Totals Check Number 59049 DICKS AUTO DETAILING Check Number 59050 E-Z RECYCLING 59050 10-Jun-99 E-Z RSCYClilNG Totals Check Number 59050 E-Z RECYCLING Check Number 59051 BCM PUBLISHERS, INC 59051 ll-Jun-99 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC Totals Check Number 59051 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC Check Number 59052 EXPRESS MESSENGER 59052 ll-Jun-99 EXPRESS MESSENGER Totals Check Number 59052 EXPRESS MESSENGER Check Number 59053 PORTIS BENEFITS lO-Jun-99 PORTIS BENEFITSS90S3 25.25 25.25 100.00 100.00 5«697.72 5,697.72 37.40 37.40 13.65 13.65 35.69 Page 5 Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 59045 DCA Totals Check I^umber 59045 DCA .20 Check Number 59046 DCA - WIRE ONLY 59046 ll-Jun-99 DCA -WIRE ONLY 394.82 SPENDING ACC Totals Check Number 59046 DCA -WIRE ONLY 394.82 Check Number 59047 DELTA DENTAL 59047 lO-Jun-99 DELTA DENTAL 3.64 JUNE DENTAL 59047 lO-Jun-99 DELTA DENTAL 2.28 JUNE DENTAL 55047 lO-Jun-99 DELTA DENTAL 6.95 JUNE DENTAL 59047 lO-Jun-99 DELTA DENTAL 2.33 JUNE DENTAL 59047 lO-Jun-99 DELTA DENTAL 0.94 JUNE DENTAL 59047 lO-Jun-99 DELTA DENTAL 5.93 JUNE DENTAL 59047 lO-Jun-99 DELTA DENTAL 822.53 JUNE DENTAL Totals Check Number 59047 DELTA DENTAL 844.60 LUNCH - TRAINING RSIOVE GRAPHICS SOD 178 RECYCLING MAY 1999 DISPLAY AL DEL TO CLIFFORD GREEN LTD INSURANCE 6/99 1 yi ^ J $ 11 Jun 1999 Fri 1:46 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 6 Check NuiQber Date Name Check Number 59053 59053 FORTIS BENEFITS lO-Jun-99 FORTIS BENEFITS Totals Check Number 59053 FORTIS BENEFITS Check Number S9055 G a K SERVICES 59055 59055 59055 59055 59055 59055 59055 59055 59055 59055 59055 59055 59055 59055 59055 59055 09-Jun-99 09-Jun-99 09-JUI1-99 09-Jun-99 09-Jun-99 09-J*m-99 09-Jun-:# 09-Jun-99 09-Jun-99 09-Jun-99 09-Jun-99 09- Jun-99 10- Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 G & G k G k G k G k Q k U k G k G k G & G k G k G k G k G k G k K SERVICES R SERVICES K SERVICES K SERVICES K SERVICES K SERVICES K dC.KViL>.d R SERVICES R SERVICES R SERVICES R SERVICES R SERVICES R SERVICES R SERVICES K SERVICES R SERVICES Totale Check Number Check Number 59055 G a R SERVICES 59057 GENUINE PARTS CO. 59058 08-Jun-99 GHT CONSTRUCTION* INC Totals Check Number 59058 GHT CONSTRUCTION* INC Check Number 59059 GOLP CAR MIDWES*^ 59059 08-Jun-99 GOLF CAR HIDNEST Totals Check Number 59059 GOLF CAR MIDWEST Transaction Amount 728.05 763.74 66.44 8.52 111.39 29.71 14.02 34.02 e<i .bb 8.52 86.44 74.66 92.02 8.52 14.02 74.95 29.71 6.52 766.12 4*037.88 4*037.88 1*400.00 1*400.00 Commer.ts LTD INSURANCE 6/99 MATS - PW UNIFORM - STEFFENHAGEN UNIFORMS SHOP TOWELS UNIFORM RATHBUN UNIFORM RATHBUN UNitUAHS UNIPORM-STEFFENHAGEN MATS - PW UNIFORMS UNIFORM UNIFORM-STEFFENHAGEN UNIFORM RATHBUN UNIFORMS SHOP TOWELS UNIFORM-STEFFENHAGEN 59057 10- Vi-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.6.38 BELTS 59057 lO-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.0.10 PC 59057 lO-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.11.02 FILTER* FLUID 59057 lO-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.2.01 TAR REMOVER 59057 lO-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.6.37 JACK OIL 59057 lO-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.8.50 PRIMER 59057 lO-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.26.14 SOLENOID* BLOWCUN 59057 lO-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.2.56 PIPES 59057 lO-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.21.36 RING* GASKETS 59057 10-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.1.17 MISC SUPPLIES 59057 lO-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.30.85 SOLENOID 59057 lO-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.0.46 SCREWS 59057 lO-Jun-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.7.97 LENS Totals Check Number 59057 GENUINE PARTS CO.134.91 Check Number 59058 GHT CONSTRUCTION*INC RFP 83 LS 113 RELAB LEASE PMT - GOLF CARTS 11 Jun 1999 Fri 1:46 PM Check Number Date Name Check Number 59059 GOLF CAR MIDWEST Check Number • 53060 GOLF CRAFT 59060 lO-Jun-99 GOLF CRAFT Check Register City of Orono Totals Check Number 59060 GOLF CRAFT Check Number 59061 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 08-Jun-99 08-Jun-99 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. Totals Check Number S9061 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. Check Number 59062 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 59062 59062 08-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Totals Check Number 59062 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Check Number 59063 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. 59063 59063 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS Totals Check Number 59063 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. Check Number 59064 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN 59064 59064 Oa-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TRBASURER-GQI HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN Totals Check Number 59064 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN Check Number 59066 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS 5S066 lO-Jun-99 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS Totals Check Number 59066 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS Transaction Amount 168.25 168.25 16.62 16.63 33.25 136.25 25.97 162.22 71.25 25.00 96.25 2,198.25 47,427.62 49,625.(7 280.24 280.24 Page 7 Comments RENTAL CLUBS APRIL 99 LOCATES APRIL 99 LOCATES BOOKING FEES 4/99 MICROPHONE REPAIR MAILING LIST-NEBER HILLS MAILING LIST-EDGENOOD JAIL CHARGES 4/99 2ND HALF ASSESSOR PYMT Check Number 59065 HINSHAW a CULBERTSON 59065 ll-Jun-99 HINSHAW a CULBERTSON 2,563.94 LEGAL APPLIC MARCH 59065 ll-Jun-99 HINSHAW a CULBERTSON 503.02 FERNDALE RD MSA 59065 ll-Jun-99 HINSHAW a CULBERTSON 1.100.00 LEGAL SERVICE MARCH 59065 ll-Jun-99 HINSHAW a CULBERTSON 16.00 GORDON NELSON HATTER 59065 ll-Jun-99 HINSHAW a CULBERTSON 1,684.02 SAGA HILL LAND ACQ 59065 ll-Jun-99 HINSHAW a CULBERTSON 330.00 HEAD SEWER PROJ 59065 ll-Jun-99 HINSHAW a CULBERTSON 165.00 NORTH ARM BASEMENT 59065 l’.-Jun-99 HINSHAW a CULBERTSON 1,106.48 BOOOR PARK REALTY 59065 ll-Jun-99 HINSHAW a CULBERTSON 673.16 WOODHILL CC-ROAD MATTER Total* Chack Rusiber S906S HINSHAW a CULBERTSON 8,141.62 LODGINQ-HASEMAN CLKS CONF ! I fi 11 Jun 1999 Fri 1:46 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Hunber Date Hame Check Number 59066 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS Che'k Number 59067 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 55067 59067 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 IKON OFFICE SOT.TTTTONS IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS Totals Check Number 59067 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS Check Number 59068 INFRATECH 59068 59068 08-Jun-99 Go *JuA-99 INFRATECH INFRATECH Totals Check Number 59068 INFRATECH Check Number 59069 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 59069 08-Jun-99 INTERSTATE BATTERIES Totals Check Number 59069 INTERSTATE BATTERIES Check Nu*rber 59070 KELLAR KENNEN ASSOCIATE 59070 ll-Jun-99 KELLAR KENNEN ASSOCIATE Totals Check Numbe 59070 KELLAR KENNEN ASSOCIATE Check Number 59071 59071 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA 08-/un-99 KQJNBTHtN. POTTS, PA Totals Check Number 59071 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA Check Number 59072 KWOM 59072 lO-Jun-99 KWOM Totals Check Number 59072 KWOM Check NU^er 59073 LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DIST. 59073 lO-Jun-99 LAKE MTKA CCNSERVATION DIST* Totals Check Number 59073 LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DIST. Check Number 59074 LARSON PUBLICATIONS S9074 lO-Jun-99 LARSON PUBLICATIONS Totals Check Number 59074 LARSON PUBLICATIONS Check Number 59075 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 59075 lO-Jun-99 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Transaction Amount 6.857.20 210.60 7,067.80 2,841.98 2,392.33 5,234.31 55.33 55.33 2,302.88 2,302.88 2.291.65 2.291.66 408.00 408.00 6,615.35 6,615.35 210.00 210.00 40.00 Page 8 Comments MAINT C0^rr7ACT•C^PTERS MAINT CONT - PD FAX TELEVISE W FRNDALE - I6I TELEVISE FRIwLE AV N-iai BATTERY - CAT GRADER SPRING NEWSLF-TER PROSEa^ION SRVCS 5/99 RADIO ADVERTISING 3RD QTR LMCD LEVY ADVERTI RENEWAL - LMC BULLETIN i r 11 Jun 1999 Pri It46 PN Check Register City of Orono Page 9 Check Number Date Name Transaction Amount Comments Check Number 59075 59075 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES lO-Jun-99 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Totals Check Number 59075 LEAGtJE OF MN CITIES Check Number 59076 lmcit-berkley admin 59076 lO-Jun-99 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN Totals Check Number 59076 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIh Check Number 59077 LOB'S OIL COMPANY 182.92 222.92 1999 DIRECTORY 18,851.75 18,851.75 COMP MUNIC COVERAGE PAY 1 Check Number 59081 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI k CO 59081 5>'^81 10-»7un-99 lO-Jun-99 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI k CO MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI k CO 1,900.00 37.00 AUDIT RFP 82 AUDIT EXP 82 Totals Creek Number 59081 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI k CO Check Numbex 59082 MCFOA 1,937.00 59082 59082 09- Jun-99 10- Jun-99 MCFOA MCFOA 30.00 30.00 MCFOA MEMBERSHIP-PETTIT MCFOA MEMBERSHIP - VIE Totals Check Number 59082 MCFOA Check Number 59083 MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING 59083 08-Jun-99 MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING 60.00 35,827.77 FINAL PKT - PHONE SYSTSf 59077 iO-Jun-99 LOE'S OIL COMPANY 32.50 OIL FILTER DISPOSAL Totals Check Number 59077 LOE'S OIL COMPANY 32.50 i Check Number 59078 LOGIS 59078 lO-Jun-99 LOGIS 958.34 PINS APPLIC - MARCH 59078 io-Jun-99 LOGIS 650.00 PIMS SYST LEVEL - 1998 59078 lO-Jun-99 LOGIS 650.00 PIMS SYST DE'^L - 1999 Totals Check Number 59078 LOGIS 2,258.34 i Check Number 59079 H k P UTILITIES INC. 59079 09-Jun-99 Map UTILITIES INC.47.50 LOCATE UNDRGRND SRVC Totals Check Number 59079 Map UTILITIES INC.47.50 ! Check Number 59080 MAGIC CLEANERS l ;1 59080 08-Jun-99 MAGIC CLEANERS 12.36 BLANKET CLEANING 59080 08-Jun-99 MAGIC CLEANERS 6.66 BLANKET CLEANING Totals Check Number 59080 MAGIC CLEANERS 19.02 I •! 11 Jun 1999 Fri 1:46 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 590B3 S9083 MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING 08-Jun-99 MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING Totals Check Nuriser USA PUBLISHING Check Number 59084 MEDTOX LABORATORIES 59084 lO-Jun-99 MEDTOX LABORATORIES Totals Check Number 59084 MEDTOX LABORATORIES Check Number 59085 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 59085 59085 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Totals Check Number 59085 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Check Number 59086 MET COLHICIL E*V/IRONMENTAL SER 59086 59086 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER Totals Check Number 59086 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER Check Number 59C27 MGCSA 59087 ll-Jun-99 MGCSA Totals Check Number 59087 MGCSA Check Number 59088 MIDWEST ASPHALT 59088 59088 59088 08-Jun-99 08-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT MIDWEST ASPHALT Totals Check Number 59088 MIDWEST ASPHALT Check Number 59089 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 59089 09-Jun-99 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Totals Check Number 59089 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Number 59090 MINN COMM 59090 08-Jun-99 MINN COMM Totals Check Number 59090 MINN COMM Check Number 59091 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 59091 08-Jun-99 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Transaction Amount 6.66 3S« b.4J 106.00 106.00 19.556.92 -1.355.00 18.203.92 2.100.00 -21.00 2.079.00 80.00 80.00 100.48 687.63 226.21 1.014.32 152.50 152.50 4.34 4.34 13.50 Page 10 Comments GTE DIRECTORY ADV DRUG TESTING SEWER SERVICE PR YR COST ALLOC SAC CHARGS 4/99 ADM FEE 4/99 1999 DUES-STBFPENHAGSN HAND PATCH HAND PATCH HAND PATCH SOFT DRINKS TA CES PW PAGERS MEDICAL OXYGEN ;k* 4 11 Jun 1999 Frl 1:46 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59091 Minneapolis oxygen company Total* Check Number 59091 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Check Number 59092 MINNEGASCO Check Number 59091 MINNESOTA CONWAY 59093 09-Jun-99 MINNESOTA COfWAY Total* Check Number MINNESOTA CONWAY Check Number 59094 MINNETONKA MIST 59094 59094 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 MINNETONKA MIST MINNETONKA MIST Total* Check Number 59094 MINNETONKA MIST Check Number 59095 MINNETONKA SOUND k LIGHTING 59095 00-Jun-99 MINNETUNKA SOUND k LIGHTING Total* Check Number 59095 MINNETONKA SOUND k LIGHTING Check Number 59096 NN DEPT OF HEALTH 59096 08-Jun-99 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Total* Check Number 59096 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Check Number 59097 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC. 59097 09-Jun-99 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC. Total* Check Number 59097 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC. Check Number 59090 MUCC 59090 09-Jun-99 MUCC Total* Check Number 59090 MUCC Check Number 59099 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 59099 ll-Jun-99 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION Total* Check Number 59099 MUNICIPAL code corporation Transaction Amount 13.50 45.84 40.84 71.45 344.47 415.92 75.00 75.00 1«081.00 1,081.00 38.34 38.34 30.00 30.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 Page 11 Comments 59092 O0-Jun-99 MINNEGASCO 120.60 GAS SERVICE 59092 O0-Jun-99 MINNEGASCO 10.64 GAS SERVICE 59092 08-Jun-99 MINNEGASCO 101.04 GAS SERVICE 59092 O0-Jun-99 MINNEGASCO 123.50 GAS SERVICE 59092 O0-Jun-99 MINNEGASCO 131.89 GAS SERVICE Total* Check Number 59092 MINNEGASCO 407.67 RECHARGE FIRE EXTINGUISHE FIRE CHIEFS LUNCHEON POL RESERVE DINNER PORTABLE PA SYSTEM WTR CONNECTION FEE 6/99 MICROPHONE 1999 CONTR SEMINAR PROOFS-CODB PUBLICATION t f 1 11 Jun 1999 Check Register Page Fri 1:46 PM City ot Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 59099 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION Check Number 59102 NAVARRE HARDWARE 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 1.96 KEY RING 59102 10-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 10,69 CHAIN, SNAPS,KEY, RING 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 9.56 WRECKING BAR 59102 10-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 15.22 NUTS, BOLTS, RUBBING CMPD 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 15.26 LIQ NAILS, CORNER GRDS 59102 10-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 12.08 SUMP PMP KIT, CLAMPS 59102 10-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 21.30 ACRYLIC SHEET 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 6.37 HEX BUSHINGS 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 0.84 SNAP - KEY RING 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 74.53 TOOLS 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 15.41 TRASH CAN, BATTERY 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 7.43 HI TORQUE CLAMP 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 20.61 BATTERY, TRSH BAGS, KEY 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 10.64 SHOVEL FOR PATCHING 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 12.41 ENAMIL, BULBS, KEY 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 0.53 COPIES 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 0.62 STRAPS 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 1.27 KEY FOR WTR PLNT 59102 lC-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 0.59 GALV NIPPLE 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 20.38 CONCRETE MIX 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 23.19 STAPLE GUN, BALLOONS 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 11.27 BUG SPRAY 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 13.39 ANT KILLER, DIAZINON 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 6.77 BALLOONS FOR SHOOT 59102 lO-JUn-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 33.99 BUG SPRAY 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE hAKDWARi.7.42 VCilrCKU 59102 lO-Jun-99 NAVARRE |1ARDWARE 8.50 YELLOW MRKING PAINT 59102 XO-Jun-99 NAVARRE HARDWARE 3.94 SCREWS, ANCHORS Totals Check Number 59102 NAVARRE HARDWARE 346.17 Check Number 59103 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 59103 lO-Jun-99 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 108.00 JUNE PERA LIFE Totals Check Number 59103 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 108.00 Check Number 59104 NEOPOST 59104 O0-Jun-99 NE9P0ST 65.70 A/VA Ml Totals Check Number S9X04 NEOPOST Check Number 59105 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE 59105 lO-Jun-99 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE Totals Check Number 59105 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE Check Number 5910S NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS 65.70 32.00 32.00 BLOOD DRAWS j 11 Jun 1999 Fri ls46 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 13 Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 59106 NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS 59106 08-Jun-99 NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS 583.15 TRACTOR PARTS Totalis Cb»~’'•’•jmber 59106 NGaTHZR:; PkuuuCTS .13 Check i^umber 59107 NSP 59107 ll-Jun-99 NSP 133.17 HWY 12 k WILLOW ELEC 59107 ll-Jun-99 NSP 1,184.32 STREET LIGHTING 59107 ll-Jun-99 NSP 1,144.87 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59107 ll-Jun-99 NSP 457.77 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59107 ll-Jun-99 NSP 9.42 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59107 ll-Jun-99 NSP 241.96 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59107 ll-Jun-99 NSP 29.15 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59107 ll-Jun-99 NSP 2,153.04 ELECTRICAL SERVICE S91Q7 ll-Jun-99 NSP 1,540.96 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 59107 ll-Jun-99 NSP 249.77 ELECTRICAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 59107 NSP 7,144.43 Check Number 5910t? DEPOT 59108 lO-Jun-99 OFFICE DEPOT 43.07 WRIST REST, KEYBOARD 59108 lO-Jun-99 OFFICE DEPOT 148.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 59108 lO-Jun-99 OFFICE DEPOT 181.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 59108 lO-Jun-99 OFFICE DEPOT 1.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 59108 lO-Jun-99 OFFICE DEPOT -60.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 59108 lO-Jun-99 OFFICE DEPOT -73.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 59108 lO-Jun-99 OFFICE DEPOT 6.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 591C2 10 Jun-99 5. ! 1 crtoer 59108 lO-Jun-99 OFFICE DEPOT 59.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 59108 lO-Jun-99 OFFICE DEPOT 72.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES 59108 lO-Jun-99 OFFICE DEPOT 5.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 59108 lO-Jun-99 OFFICE DEPOT 4.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES Totals Check Number 59108 OFFICE DEPOT 394.43 Check Number 59109 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC. 59109 09-Jun-99 ^iJD DUTCH FOODS INC.15.12 CHIPS Totals Check Number 59109 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.15.12 Check Number 59110 OLSONe RON 59110 lO-Jun-99 OLSON« RON 5.31 PHONE CORD 59110 lO-Jun-99 OLSON, RON 61.71 MILEAGE RKINUSEMENT Totals Check Number 59110 OLSON, RON 67. C2 Check Number 59111 OMAN, LYLE 59111 10-Jun-99 OMAN, LYLE 24.42 MILEAGE REIMURSmENT i IL 11 Jun 1999 Prl 1:46 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 14 Check Number Date Name Check Number 59111 59111 59111 OMAN, LYLE 10-Jun-99 OMAN, LYLE OMAN, LYLElO-Jun-99 Totals Check Number 59111 OMAN, LYLE Check Number 59112 PALMER, GREG 59112 08-Jun-99 PALMER, GREG Totals Check NundE>er 59112 PALMER, GREG Check Number 59113 PERFORMANCE DRIVING INC. 59113 lO-Jun-99 PERFORMANCE DRIVING INC. Totals Check Number 59113 PERFORMANCE DRIVING INC. Check Number 59114 PERSONNEL DECISIONS 59114 59114 08-Jun-99 lO-Jun-95 PERSONNEL DECISIONS PERScrcrzL decisions Totals Check Number 59114 PERSONNEL DECISIONS Check Number 59118 PRECISION TURF Transaction Amount Comments 51.15 35.31 MILEAGE REIMURSEMENT MILEAGE REIMURSEMENT 110.88 100.00 100.00 SAFETY SHOES 440.00 440.00 DR TRNG-WITTKE, CORNICE 60.00 80.00 BLNK QUESTIONNAIRE BOORS POSITION PROFILED 140.00 Check Number 59115 PIONEER 59115 08-Jun-99 PIONEER 43.15 PUBLICATION APP 2484 59115 08-Jun-99 PIONEER 75.50 LANDUSB APPLICATIONS 59115 08-Jun-99 PIONEER 23.37 APPLICATION 2479 59115 08-Jun-99 PIONEER ,32.36 ORDINANCE ilB6 59115 O0-Jun-99 PIONEER 7.19 ADV BIOS-NTR TANK 59115 08-Jun-99 PIONEER 35.95 ORDINANCE 1187 59115 lO-Jun-99 PIONEER 53.93 ADV FOR BIDS-ST BAY RO 59115 lO-Jun-99 PIONEER 86.28 NOTICE PRO ASSES'EOGENOOD 59115 lO-Jun-99 PIONEER 27.74 NO OF HEARING-NEBBR HILLS 59115 lO-Jun-99 PIONEER 51.14 ADVERTISMENT - GOLF COURS Totals Check Number 59115 PIONEER 436.61 Check Number 59116 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. 59116 08-Jun-99 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC.963.86 MAY JANITORIAL 59116 08-Jun-99 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC.788.62 NAY JANITORIAL Totals Check Number 59116 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC.1,752.48 Check Number S9117 PRAIRIE OFFSET • 59117 08-Jun-99 PRAIRIE OFFSET 695.41 ENVLPS, LTTRHD, RESOLUTIO Totals Check Number 59117 PRAIRIE OFFSET 695.41 ■r*. 11 Jun 1999 Pri 1:46 PM Check Number Check Number 59118 Check Register City of Orono Date Name 59118 PRECISION TURF 10-Jun-99 PRECISION TURF Totals Check Number 59118 PRECISION TURF Check Number 59119 59119 PRESTIGE FLAG ll-Jun-99 Totals Check Number PRESTIGE FLAG 59119 PRESTIGE FLAG Check Number 59120 QUARTERLY ADVERTISING, INC Totals Check Number 59120 QUARTERLY ADVERTISING, INC Check Humber 59121 59121 59121 SCHARBER 4 SONS 08-Jun-99 08-Jun-99 Totals Check Number SCHARBER k SONS SCHARBER k SONS 59121 SCHARBER k SONS Check Number 59122 59122 SCHOENHOPF, JOHN 00-Jun-99 Totals Check Number SCHOENHOPF, JOHN 59122 SCHOENHOPF, JOHN Check Number 59123 59123 SEARS 08-Jun-99 SEARS Totals Check Humber 59123 SEARS Check Humber 59124 59124 SHANK CONSTRUCTORS lO-Jun-99 Totals Check Number SHANK CONSTRUCTORS 59124 SHANK CONSTRUCTORS Check Number 59125 59125 STA-SAPE LOCKSMITH OB-Jun-99 Totals Check Nurnber STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH 59125 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH Check Number 59126 59126 59126 STAR TRIBUNE 08-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 Totals Check Number STAR TRIBUNE STAR TRIBUNE 59126 STAR TRIBUNE Transaction Amount 254.32 254.32 216.32 216.32 ^ w . w w 295.00 89.36 3.09 92.45 94.79 94.79 157.06 157.06 28,193.00 28,193.00 50.00 50.00 462.50 450.00 912.50 Page IS Comments FERTILIZER k HERBICIDE FLAGS N/LOGO A, a 4 r\\jC* rw MOWER PARTS PIN. SHAFT KEY DARE PIZZA PARTY IMPACT WRENCH, SOCKETS NAV WTR REHAB - RPr #8 REM BRKN KEY PROM LOCK ADV - ADMINXSnATXVE SPRT ADV - ADM SUPPORT 1 11 Jun 1999 Fri It46 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 16 Cheek Number Date Name Check Number 59127 59127 STEFFENHAGEN, RON lO-Jun-99 STEFFENHAGEN, RON Totals Check Number 59127 STEFFENHAGEN, RON Check Number 59128 STEPHEN FRALEY INTERPTNG SRVC Transaction Amount Comment! 39.09 39.09 PLANTS/FLOWERS 59128 08-Jun-99 STEPHEN FRALEY INTERPTNG SRVC 50.00 SP7JIISH INTERPRETING Totals Check Number 59128 STEPHEN FRALEY INTERPTNG SRVC 50.00 Check Number 59129 STREICHERS 59129 08-Jun-99 STREICHERS 12.73 BUTT PLATE 59129 08-JUU-99 STREICHERS 36.00 REPAIR AMPLIFIER 59129 08-Jun-99 STREICHERS 39.92 IRRIT/ rr, HLOER. RAIN HAT 59129 08-Jun-99 STREICHERS 122.26 BATON, IRRITANT, HLORS 59129 08-Jun-99 STREICHERS 10.60 MILITEC 4 OZ Totals Check Number 59129 STREICHERS 221.51 Check Number 59130 SUN NEWSPAPERS 59130 08'Jun-99 NEWSPAPERS 156.40 ADV FOR SECRETARY Totals Check Number 59130 SUN NEWSPAPERS 156.40 Check Nuiaber S9131 TEHPORARIES-TO-QO 59131 08-Jun-99 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 237.50 TEMP HELP • FRNT COUNTER 59131 59131 09- Jun-99 10- Jun-99 TBMPORARIES-TO-GO 108.00 TEMP HELP TO 5/30/99 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 234.38 TEMP HELP NK END 5/23/99 59131 lO-Jun-99 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 108.00 TEMP HELP vnc END 6/6/99 59131 10-Jun-99 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 175.00 TEMP HELP WK END 6/6/99 Totals Check Number 59131 TEMPORARIBS>TO-GO 662.88 Check Number 59132 THE HOME DEPOT • 59132 08-Jun-99 THE HOME DEPOT 502.48 DOCK REPAIR MATERIALS 59132 08-Jun-99 THE HOME DEPOT 59.06 SHOP LIGHTS. EXT CORDS Totals Check Number 59132 i-HE HONE DEPOT 561.54 Check Number 59333 TNB CONSULTING INC 59133 08-Jun-99 TMB CONSULTING INC 3C0.C0 SET UP NEW COMPUTER 59133 08-Jun-99 THB CONSULTING INC 75.00 SYSTEM AUDIT-COMPUTERS Totals Check Number 59133 TMB CONSULTING INC 375.00 Check Number 59134 TOLL QAS HBLOINO SUPPLY • 59134 08-Jun-99 TOLL GAS a WELDING SUPPLY 6.70 CYLINDER RENTAL 1 r 11 Jun 1999 Pri 1:46 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 59134 TOLL GAS k MELDING SUPPLY Totals Check Number 59134 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY Check Number 59135 TONY EIDEN COMPANY 59135 59135 lO-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 TONY EIDEN COMPANY TONY EIDEN COMPANY Totals Check Number 59135 TONY EIDEN COMPANY Check Number 59136 TRACY TRIPP FUELS 59136 08-Jun-99 TRACY TRIPP FUELS Totals Check Number 59136 TRACY TRIPP FUELS Check Number 59137 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 59137 10-Jun-99 TREADWAY GRAPHICS Totals Check Nuodber 59137 TREADWAY GRAPHICS Check Number 59138 TRUST-X Q.M.S. 59138 ll-Jun-99 TRUST-X Q.M.S. Totals Check Number 59138 TRUST-X Q.M.S. Check Number 59139 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 59139 59139 59139 lO-Jun-99 10-Jun-99 lO-Jun-99 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Totals Check Number 59139 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Check Number 59140 UNITED states postal SERVICE 59140 lO-Jun-99 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 59140 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Check Number 59142 59142 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS ll-Jun-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Transaction Amount 6.70 1,509.81 150.00 1,659.81 368.71 368.71 131.18 131.18 217.10 217.10 87.30 36.45 40.27 164.02 1,800.00 1,800.00 54.76 Page 17 Comments REFUND PERMIT #11195 REFUND PERMIT #11195 DIESEL, UNLEADED DARE AWARDS 16 GALLON STONE RECEPTICL TROUSERS - SCHOENROFP SHIRT - PERSBLL SHIRT - PERSELL POSTAGE FOR ISTER Check Number 59141 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 59141 ll-Jun-99 L^-JM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 376.95 fi/99 cmm LXFB 59141 ll-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 61.60 6/99 tnnm Lira 59141 ll-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 87.15 6/99 A060 Lira 59141 ll-Jun-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 13.20 6/99 ADU> Lira Totals Check Number 59141 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 538.90 PHONE SERVICE II Jun 1999 Fri 1:46 PM Check Number Check Register City of Orono Date Name Transaction Amount Page 18 Comments Check Number 59142 59142 59^42 59142 59142 59142 59142 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 li-o ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 Totals Check Number US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS ud fttaok uuf*u*iuNICAiiUi>id US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 59142 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Check Number 59143 59143 WALOOR PUMP 08-Jun-99 WALOOR PUMP WALDOR PTTMP 43.18 10.85 6 1.4.1 202.30 75.17 45.94 493.42 2.829.20 2.829.20 PHONE SERVICE PHONE SERVICE-FINAL BILL OC.KVICE - GC DIRECTROY ADV - GC PHONE SERVICE PHONE SERVICE REPAIRS - LS il6 Check Number 59144 WARNING LITES OP MN 59144 08-Jun-99 Totals Check Number WARNING LITES OF MN 59144 WARNING LITES OF MN 105.44 105.44 BARRICADES Check Number 59145 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 59145 08-Jxm-99 Totals Check Nuniber WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 59145 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 341.19 341.19 FRNT TIRES-STRT SWEEPER Check Number 59146 59146 59146 59146 WIDMER INC ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 ll-Jun-99 WIDMER INC WIDMER INC WIDMER INC Totals Check Number 59146 WIDMER INC Check Number 59147 59147 WOLF, LANETTE lO-Jun-99 Totals Check Number WOLF, LANETTE 59147 WOLF, LANETTE Check Number 5S148 59148 59148 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC lO-Jun-99 10-Jun-99 Totals Check Number WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 59148 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Check Number 59149 59149 YOCUM OIL CO INC. 08-Jun-99 Totals Check Number YOCUM OIL CO INC 59149 YOCUM OIL CO INC, 320.00 1.472.00 448.00 2.240.00 175.00 175.00 8.00 20.36 28.36 67.73 67.73 BACKHOB-1910 SHADYWOOD WTRMAIN RPR-2455 OLD BCH RPR CURB STP-1950 CONCOR MINUTES 5/10/99 ELECTRICAL SERVICE ELECTRICAL SERVICE HEATING OIL 11 Jun 1999 Fri 1:46 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 19 Check Transaction Humber Date Name Amount Conunentfl Check Number 59150 YOUNG, JACKIE • 59150 08-Jun-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 150.00 PWC COMM MINOTES 5/7/99 59150 08-Jun-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 200.00 PLN CO»M MINOTES 5/21/99 59150 08-Jun-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 175.00 COUNCIL MINUTES 5/24/99 59150•08-Jun-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 200.00 WOODHILL MINUTES 5/11/99 Totals Check Humber 59150 YOUIKS,JACKIE 725.00 Grand Total 376,103.16 i COUNCIL MEETING JUN 1 4 1999 CITY OF UHUNO e^ormation ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL MEETING JUN 1 4 1999 CtTYOFORONO OF ■| ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 COI l^rclL MRETINQ JUN 1 4 1999 CITY OF ORONO ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the foliowing members present: Chair Elizabeth Hawn, Commissioners Wiiiiam Stoddard. Date Lindquist, amd Janice Berg. Commissioner Sandra Smith was absent. The following represented City Staff: Assistant Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Senior Pianning Coordinator Mike Gaffron, and Recorder Jackie Young. Council Member Charles Kelley was present. Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:28 p.m. OLD BUSINESS (#1) #2469 STEVEN AND JO WEBSTER, 500 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCES Steven and Jo Webster were present. Weinberger stated the Applicants appeared before the Pianning Commission at their April meeting where they were directed to revise their plan to create a greater setback for the proposed garage and residential addition from Dickenson Street and the alley. The Applicants have submitted a revised plan which places the proposed garage five feet off the property line and seventeen feet from Dickenson Street. The existing house is located 19.1 feet from the side property tine. Weinberger noted that the only other user of this alley is the property to the south. The City currently owns and maintains this alley. Variances to the side yard adjacent to the street is required to permit a setback of five feet where fifty feet is required; to permit a 17 foot side yard setback where SO feet is required; and to permit a 36.8 foot front yard setback where 50 feet is required. The Zoning Code requires a 30 foot setback for garages with access served towards a street. City Staff hos determined that this revised plan is more in conformance with existing codes and that it Is impossible to place an addition on the residence except for one small section of the property without encroaching into a setback. Weinberger stated the existing garage located on the property line will be removed. Webster commented that the little room that is located between the house and the garage will be incorporated Into the house to allow for an extra five feet. Webster stated they are putting the house at an angle on the lot to try to take advantage of the southern exposure. Lindquist stated he does not have a problem with Ihe application, noting that this plan is a real improvement over the previous plan. Hawn remarked that she appreciates the efforts the Applicants have made to revise their plans. Stoddard inquired how the potential land deal is proceeding. Webster stated that they have made an offer, and inquired whether the Planning Commission could Page 1 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2469 STEVEN AND JO WEBSTER. CONTINUED recommend that this land be sold. Stoddard stated that the Planning Commission is not in a position to recommend that. Webster stated that if the Websters assumed the cost of the property line rearrangement, they probably would be In favor of that. Webster remarked that he has proposed to deed them up to 20 feet to incorporate into their own driveway if they so choose. Hawn inquired when the existing garage would be removed. Webster replied that that structure would be removed right away. There were no public comments. Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2469,500 Orono Orchard Road South, to permit variances to a side yard adjacent to the street (alley) setback of five feet where 50 feet is required; to permit a 17 foot side yard setback where 50 feet is required; and to permit a 36.8 foot front yard setback where 50 feet is required, and to allow a setback less than 30 feet for the garage with access off the alley. Approval is contingent upon removal of the present garage. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#2) #2169 MICHAEL RENARD, 1185 TONKAWA ROAD - AMENDMENT OF VARIANCE Mr. and Mrs. Michael Renard were present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting approval of a variance addition in revising the structural amount already approved in a 75-250 foot hardcover variance approved in 1996. The Applicant is proposing to remove an existing shed and its associated hardcover and replacing it with a larger shed. The existing shed is currently located 2.36 feet from the property line, with the new shed being located 10.36 feet from the property line, which would remove it from the side yard setback. Weinberger stated a hardcover variance was approved in 1996 to allow the hardcover coverage in the 75-250' area to be 26.7 percent. The Applicant is proposing to remove the shed and to construct a 12' by 21* shed. The proposed development would not increase the amount of hard cover. The existing shed is 12' by 14'. The Applicants are proposing to remove a sidewalk to help reduce hardcover. Structural coverage is not an issue on this lot. The City will benefit with moving the new shed ten feet from the property Kne and no longer in the side yard setback. City Staff recommended denial of this variance addition with the understanding that hardcover would be increased on the property. Staff also has concerns about trading concrete for structural coverage. Renard had no comments regarding his application. Lindquist inquired whether Staff would be recommending approval if the hardcover would remain at 26.7 percent. Weinberger stated they would still be recommending denial of this application because the hardcover still exceeds 25 percent and no hardship has been demonstrated. Page 2 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2169 MICHAEL RENARD, CONTINUED Hawn inquired of the Applicant what he felt the hardship was. Renard stated that they have outgrown the present shed, noting that he would like to store his two trailers inside to prevent premature deterioration of the trailers. Renard commented that he has kept the new shed at a minimum size, noting that his one trailer is 20.5 feet, and has attempted to make this new shed as conforming as possible. Hawn remarked that the topography of the land normally causes the hardship and not the needs of the Applicant. Hawn noted that there is an improvement by removing the shed within the setback. Lindquist inquired whether the Applicant would be able to reduce the hardcover to 25 percent. Renard stated that a major addition to the residence was added approximately two years ago which makes it very difncult to reduce the hardcover on the property. Stoddard suggested that perhaps the driveway could be reconfigured or reduced, noting that he would like to see the hardcover reduced somewhat. Renard commented that they have to access onto County Road 35, which makes the driveway turnaround a necessity for safety reasons. Stoddard remarked that he would not request that the turnaround be removed, but perhaps other steps could be taken to reduce the driveway somewhat. Renard expressed doubts that he would be able to reduce the hardcover any further on this property, noting that it originally was at 28 percent and he has reduced it to 26.7 percent. Renard commented that he would like to keep his trailers inside so they would be out of view from the neighbors. Lindquist commented that perhaps the condition be added that no additional hardcover will be allowed on this property. There were no public comments. Hawn stated she does not see a hardship, noting that the code requires that a hardship be demonstrated in order for the variance to be granted. Stoddard commented that he would like to give the Applicant the opportunity to review his plans to reduce the hardcover somewhat. Stoddard noted that the Planning Commission has become more conservative over the years on the amount of hardcover allowed. Stoddard remarked that this application could be acted on tonight or be tabled to give him some additional time to submit revised plans. Renard stated he would like the Planning Commission to act on his application. Renard stated in his view the amount of hardcover remains with the property and not with the property owner. Hawn remarked that the variance is granted for one year. Renard stated unless acted on by a building permit, which is stated very specifically. Renard requested that the application be voted on. Hawn moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend deniai of Appiication #2169,1185 Page 3 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2169 MICHAEL RENARD. CONTINUED Tonkawa Road, for an amendment to variance based on the fact that no hardship has been demonstrated. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Item #3 follows Item #6. NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS (#4) #2483 TRENT REZABEK, 3200 BAY8IDE ROAD • VARIANCE RENEWAL. 6:50 p.m. • 6:56 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Trent Rezabek was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a variance renewal for a front yard setback variance for the property located at 3200 Bayside Road. The previous resolution was adopted in March of 1989 and expired on March 13,1990. The property was subsequently sold and the addition never built. The Applicant is proposing to construct an 8* by 12' entryway on the south side of the existing residence. The existing residence is located entirely within the required front yard and street side setbacks, which requires a variance for any additions to the existing residence. This property is located within the LR-1A, One Family Lakeshore Residential District, v^ich has a minimum of two acres. The property is comprised of approximately 1.1 acres. City Staff is recommending approval of this application, noting that special conditions applying to this structure are peculiar to this property. Weinberger stated that it is impossible to constmct an addition without encroaching into the setback. Hawn inquired whether the addition would be constructed on a cement pad. Rezabek stated that an engineer will be out to look at the building pad to determine whether it is a floating pad. Rezabek remarked that he probably will remove the old pad and put in a new foundation. Weinberger stated that the Building Code would require a new foundation with footings. There were no public comments. Lindquist moved, Peterson seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2483, 3200 Bayside Road, to permit a front yard setback variance to allow an 8* by 12' entryway to be constructed on the south side of the house 18.4* from the front yard where 50' is required. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. item #5 follows Item #3. Page 4 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 (#6) #2487 ROBERTA A. ROTH. 1251 BRIAR STREEET - VARIANCES. 6:58 p.m. - 7:03 p.m. The Certiricate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Roth were present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are proposing to remove an existing house and construct a new one on the existing foundation. The current foundation was replaced in 1985. This property is located In the RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential District, which has a minimum of two acres. The property is comprised of 10,500 square feet. The Applicant applied for and received approval to construct a detached garage on the property. Variances are needed to lot area, lot width, front yard, and side yard setbacks. City Staff is recommending approval of this application since the hardcover or overall structural coverage will not increase. Mrs. Roth stated that the residence was not kept up and they would like to replace it with a new structure, noting that it is not worthwhile to make improvements to the existing house. Hawn inquired whether the building inspector has had an opportunity to inspect the foundation. Mr. Roth remarked that he has requested that Lyle and Mike from the City come out to inspect the property but they have not done so at this time. Weinberger stated that it is the building official's opinion that it will meet current codes. There were no public comments. Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2487, 1251 Briar Street, to permit variances to lot area, let Vvidth, front yard, and side yard setbacks to allow a 1,008 square foot house to be built on an existing foundation subject to the foundation being certified as to structural soundness by the City's Building Inspector, and to allow the existing garage to remain on the property during the time of construction. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. SCHEDULED PUBUC HEARINGS (#3) #2479 PETER ANDREA COMPANY, 555 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH. CLASS ill SUBDIVISION, 7:04 p.m. - 7:14 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. The Applicant vras not present. Hawn noted that the Applicant was requested to submit some required information before tonight's hearing. Weinberger stated he did speak with the Applicant this afternoon regarding tonight's meeting, noting that the Applicant did not indicate whether he would be present at tonight's meeting. City Staff is recommending that this item be tabled until next month. Hawn moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application #2479, Peter Andrea Company, Page 5 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2469 PETdR ANDREA COMPANY. CONTINUED 555 Stubbs Bay Road North, to the June 21st meeting. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Hawn inquired whether there were any members present in the audience who had wanted to speak regarding this application. Six to eight people indicated that they were here tonight regarding this application. Hawn commented that this application should be removed from tabling to allow the people in the audience to comment on this application. Hawn inquired whether the Applicant can be contacted to see if he would be attending tonight's meeting. Weinberger stated he attempted to contact the Applicant prior to the meeting but was unable to reach him. Weinberger remarked that the Applicant was to have contacted him to tell him of his plans for tonight. The Applicant indicated that he does intend to submit revised plans. A resident in the audience commented that this was the second time that the Applicant has not appeared. Lindquist stated that the Planning Commission does not have much choice but to table this application. Lindquist inquired whether the residents would be notified of the next hearing. Weinberger stated that the neighbors are required to receive notice of the hearings. Lindquist commented that the Planning Commission has no assurance that the Applicant will appear at the next hearing either, but that they vrill be required to reappear at the next hearing if they wish to speak to this application. Hawn stated that the Applicant is proposing to revise his plans, which hopefully will alleviate some of the concerns that the neighbors may have. Lindquist commented that he would like to see the neighbors involved somewhat in the planning of this subdivision, noting that there are issues regarding access onto Stubbs Bay Road and how that will impact the properties on the other side of the road. Hawn requested that the people who are in attendance leave their name with Mr. Weinberger. Weinberger stated that it is the intent to develop the street into a cul-de-sac temporarily and it is the City's position that 27 feet be dedicated in the event that a road to the north is needed to serve those lots. Weinberger noted that a portion of the properly wiil be dedicated to MnDot at the time the new interchange is put in. Weinberger stated that City Staff is aware that one property will become landlocked once the new Highway 12 improvements are completed. Hawn requested that her motion be reinstated to table this matter. NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS. CONTINUED (#5) #2455 ALEX AND CATHY JOHNSTON, 940 BROWN ROAD SOUTH • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:15 p.m. - 7:22 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Page 6 t; ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2485 ALEX AND CATHY JOHNSTON. CONTINUED Alex Johnston was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow a "guest house". This property is located in the RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential District, which is a two acre zoning district, and is comprised of 5.11 acres dry and 4.55 acres dry contiguous. A bam exists on the southeast portion of the property that the Applicant is remodeling to install a guest apartment. The bam is classified as an oversized accessory structure as it exceeds 1,000 square feet. Weinberger commented that as a condition of approval the property owner will be required to file a restrictive covenant on the property that states, in part, that no future subdivision will be approved that places the structure within a lot that has no principal structure, and if the property is subdivided, the oversize accessory structure and principal structure will be located together within a lot that meets that minimum lot area requirement for the given size of accessory building. Weinberger stated that the property does not have a conforming septic system. The Applicants have submitted a septic design that has been approved by the City, but a condition of approval shall be that a final plumbing inspection be held until the septic system has been installed and approved by the City. City Staff Is recommending approval of this application based on the existing structure meets all the yard requirements established by City Code for a guest house conditional use permit subject to the conditions that a restrictive covenant is filed on the property for an oversized accessory structure and that a final plumbing inspection be held until a septic system has been installed and approved by the City. Alex Johnston had no comment on his application. Hawn commented that there does not appear to be any areas of contention with this application. There weie no ptblic comments. Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2485, 940 Brown Road South, to allow a guest house conditional use permit subject to the structure meeting the yard requirements established by the Municipal Code for a guest house conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: The property owner files a restrictive covenant on the property for an oversized accessory structure as outlined on Page 1, Items A, B, and C, of the May 10,1999 Zoning Administrator's Report, and that a final plumbing inspection be held until a septic system has been installed and approved by the City. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Item #7 follows Item #10. (#8) #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, 2490 OLD BEACH ROAD • VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:23 p.m. • 8:17 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Rick and Gail Luzaich were present. Page 7 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED Phil Reznick, Attomey-al-Law, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting variance and conditional use permit approvals for lakeshore land alteration, including grading and construction of retaining walls within 75* of the lakeshore and within a bluff impact zone; and further request an after-the-fact approval, including approval of a restoration plan, for Intensive vegetative removal within 75 feet of the shoreline and within a bluff impact zone. No restoration at this time has been completed. Weinberger noted that the members of the Planning Commission have had an opportunity to look at the property. Staff has concerns regarding the removal of the trees within 75 feet of the shoreline due to possible erosion into the lake. The Applicant is proposing to construct a four foot retaining wall to extend along the slope. Staff has issues regarding the proposed landscaping plan as it does not contain any provisions for replacement of the trees that have been removed. Staff is requesting that reforestation be required as part of this application. Wally Case. Landscape Architect, has had an opportunity to review the landscaping plan and is recommending that this property be reviewed by a forester to determine what trees would be best for this type of soil. City Staff is recommending denial of the proposed landscape plan and requests that the Applicant submit revised plans. Currently the stumps have not been removed. Staff would also like to have the opportunity to review this application over time to insure that proper restoration of this area is achieved with similar trees. Reznick inquired whether the City was requiring a replanting of mature trees approximately the same size removed or if the Applicant could replace this type of trees with a smaller size tree. Weinberger stated that the City is requesting that the Applicant replace the trees with fairly mature trees, noting that it is not possible to replace some of the larger trees. Reznick expressed a concern regarding the cost of replacing the trees and suggested that the City look at what is right for the property rather than punishing the property owners. Reznick noted that the Applicant has been charged with a misdemeanor. The Applicants are willing to cooperate with the City to accomplish the restoration, but they would like to keep this property in line with the other surrounding properties. Reznick presented photographs to the Planning Commission and noted that the other properties do not have the lake hidden from their view. Reznick requested that the Planning Commission address the house plan, noting that the Applicants would like to start work on this property in the near future. Reznick indicated that they would like to remove the stumps and replace with some shrubbing, and expressed a concern that the equipment that would be needed to replace the trees could cause the soil to be disturbed further. Hawn indicated that she would like to see this property restored as quickly as possible to prevent erosion. Hawn noted that the City has allowed rift-raft in cases where erosion has occurred, but that the retaining walls are probably not going to be looked upon favorably by the Planning Commission. Hawn stated that the Applicants wiii need to get together with the City foresters to determine what is most feasible for this property. Luzaich staled that he is fine with restoring the property, noting that he has spent money trimming and pruning the other trees on his property and had merely removed what he thought was old Page 8 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 (#2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED unhealthy trees. Stoddard remarked that the Planning Commission has to act on what is before it tonight, noting that the Planning Commission is merely a recommending body and that any plans would need to be approved by the City Council. Stoddard commented that the Applicant should work with City Staff on the reforestation, noting that he would like to see some mature trees planted to screen the neighbors ’ view as well as the proposed hardcover reduced. Luzaich stated they had proposed the retaining walls in an effort to save the hill. Weinberger commented that the stumps could possibly be removed but that the roots should remain to help hold the dirt in place with new plants and trees planted. Reznick inquired whether anything could be agreed to tonight. Eric Paulson. Old Beach Road, stated that he has lived in this area for the past 21 years and belongs to the Lafayette Bay Association which has been proactive in trying to preserve the natural beauty of Lafayette Bay. Paulson remarked that the property owners were perhaps ignorant of the laws regarding removal of trees by the iakeshore. Gaffron remarked that the City of Orono did not and would not issue a permit to allow this type of tragedy to occur, noting that the City was not notified of this until a week after the work had already been completed. Gaffron stated that the City of Orono is adamant in its position that this type of land alteration not occur near the Iakeshore and that it is impossible to get back what has been lost. Weinberger stated that Wally Case is recommending that this property be reviewed by a forester who will review the file and look at the types of soils and determine what types of trees could be planted. Weinberger stated that they would like to have this process started sometime this week. Hawn inquired whether the Applicant's landscape planner could meet with the forester. Gary Mueller, Landscape Architect, stated he would be able to meet with the forester, noting that they are willing to discuss this property and the recommendations that they have. Mueller requested that the Planning Commission provide some guidance as to what they feel should be provided for this area. Hawn stated that retaining walls are not the answer. Stoddard stated that hardcover should be reduced and that he would like to see some larger trees planted. Lindquist remarked that the Comprehensive Plan is clear and that everything possible should be done to restore what was lost. Lindquist stated that they should meet with the City's forester as soon as possible to resolve this issue. Lindquist commented that this application will need to be tabled since the proposal is not acceptable as presented tonight. Berg commented that she is in agreement with the other members of the Planning Commission and would like to see some larger trees planted in this area to help restore what was lost. Luzaich inquired whether the stairway down to the Iakeshore was okay. Pages I! s .1 il li ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED Stoddard stated that he should work with City Staff to determine the appropriate width of the stairway, noting that the Planning Commission is not attempting to deny access to the lake by the Applicant. Mueller stated that they would like to remove the stumps, grind them down to the point where they are no longer protruding, which will require some minor grading of the slope. Mueller stated that they would also like to eradicate the poison ivy and other nuisances that occur on the bank. Mueller Inquired whether they could commence work on the retaining wall as a means to prevent erosion, noting that they will have a civil engineer out to inspect the site to insure that the wall will stay in place. Mueller commented that they would like to have a better understanding of what type of trees and size of trees the City would like to see for this area, noting that it is impossible to replace some of the larger trees. Hawn stated that they would like to see as large of trees planted as possible that have a good chance for survival, and that perhaps the forester would be in a better position to address that. Mueller inquired whether this application could proceed to the City Council on the condition that agreement is reached with City Staff on a level of treatment that is appropriate for this area. Stoddard stated the Planning Commission can vote on this application or table the application, noting that the Applicant will not be able to do any grading or retaining walls. Mueller inquired whether the stumps could be removed. Lindquist stated that in his opinion no work should be done given the history of this application until it has been approved. Lindquist remarked that he would not be comfortable approving any work on this property until City Staff and the City's forester has had an opportunity to look at this situation, and that in his opinion this application should be tabled. Stoddard indicated they could spray the poison ivy. Mueller inquired whether all the weeds could be sprayed. Stoddard stated that only the poison ivy may be sprayed. Hawn commented that the weeds may be cut. Hawn indicated that this application will probably be denied if voted on tonight. Weinberger indicated that this application requires variances and a conditional use permit that needs to be acted upon regardless of the landscape plan. City Staff is willing to work with the Applicant on this matter. Luzaich requested that his application be tabled. Hawn inquired whether the 60 day time limit needs to be extended. Weinberger inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to waive the 60 day limitation. Luzaich indicated he would be willing to waive the 60 day time period. Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to table Application #2492,2490 Old Beach Road, Page 10 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED with the understanding that the Applicant will work with City Staff and the City's forester on an appropriate plan of action for restoration of the lakeshore and bluff area, and that the 60 day time period is waived. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#9) #2493 KATHERINE TAYLOR HOMES, 692 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCES, 8:18 p.m. - 8:47 p.m. The Certiricate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Katherine Taylor was present. Barb Hugh, property owner, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting several variances to construct a two car garage where a one car garage exists and to attach a deck to the second garage on the property. The property is served with two garages, the first is a one stall detached located on Tonkawa Road and the second is a two car garage attached to the house. This property is located in the LR-1B, One Family Lakeshore Residential District, which has a minimum of one acres, and this property consists of .36 acre. The Applicant is proposing to construct a deck off the back portion of the two car garage with a spiral staircase located next to it, which would allow access to that area. Currently there are building permits issued to this property for the remodeling of an office area above the existing garage. The deck becomes an issue because it is new hardcover located over existing hardcover, and any time that structural coverage is placed over non-structural hardcover, it requires a hardcover variance. The addition of the deck would not increase the hardcover on this property, nor would it increase the amount of structural coverage allowed on the property. The deck would bring the structural coverage to 15 percent. The Applicant has proposed two options for the garage. Option A would move the garage back to the required 30 foot distance for a garage loading space of a right-of-way. However, the setback in this area is 35 feet, so it would still require a variance to the street yard setback. This option increases structural coverage to 16.4 percent, exceeding the 15 percent allowed. This option also allows the occupants of the property easier access in and out of the garage during the winter months when the steep driveway approach prevents safe access into the properly. Hardcover would also increase in the 250-500' setback. Currently hardcover is at 42.5 percent. Only a small portion of the residence is located within the 75-250* setback. The Applicant is proposing hardcover in the amount of 70.2 percent in the 250-500' setback. Weinberger stated Option B would utilize the existing location of the one stall garage. The Applicant would construct a second stall to the existing one stall garage. This maintains the garage within the required setbacks on the property, but still would require hardcover and structural coverage variances. This option would not increase the hardcover as substantially as Option A. This option simply places an addition on the existing garage, which is located approximately two to three feet off the property line. The new garage proposed in Option A would meet the 10 foot setback. City Staff has reviewed this plan and have determined that the Applicant could construct a two stall garage that would be located 10 feet from the street property line and 10 feet from the side property line if the doors are faced away from the street. However, this option probably cannot be done since City Code requires a distance of 30 feet from the garage doors to the street. Tonkawa Road is a Page 11 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2493 KATHERINE TAYLOR HOMES, CONTINUED fairly busy street and would present a safety Issue. A variance is needed to ailow hardcover to remain at 49.7 percent in the 75*250' lakeshore setback, and that wouid permit the addition of a 6.6 foot deck by 23.6 feet iocated directiy on the attached garage with a spirai staircase. The deck does meet the required setbacks in the zoning district. The second variance being requested would allow for the provision of a two stall detached garage located near Tonkawa, which would also require a variance to the hardcover. The Applicant is claiming a hardship on this property due to the high water table and the fact that the residence was constructed without a basement. This would allow the Applicant some additional storage space. City Staff is recommending denial of this application for additional structure for the garage. The garage would bring the structural coverage above the 15 percent allowed for this lot. City Staff Is recommending approval of the variance for the deck above the attached garage. The hardcover would not increase and the structural will meet the required ten foot side yard setback for the zoning district, and it will provide access to a sliding glass door being located on the second floor. Katherine Taylor stated that the Applicant is getting married in July and are looking at combining two households and are in need of additional storage space for vehicles. Taylor noted that the new garage would have better conformity to the required setbacks than the existing garage. Taylor stated that retaining walls exist behind the existing garage due to a steep hill. If the garage is located further back, more driveway would be needed. Hugh stated that the staircase also would serve as a fire escape. Hugh remarked that they would like to construct a new garage due to the fact that they are in need of additional space for the storage of vehicles, noting that the foundation of the garage needs to be redone. Hugh stated that more variances are required for the existing garage than would be for the new proposed garage. Hawn requested that the Planning Commission members comment on Option A first. it was the consensus of the Planning Commission that they were in favor of the deck. Hawn requested that the Planning Commission members comment on Option B. Berg commented that she understands the need for the new garage, but noted that the hardcover would be increased. Lindquist stated that unfortunately some lots have already reached the maximum on hardcover and no further improvements can be made. Taylor inquired whether the hardcover could be done differently. Hawn stated that the Planning Commission rarely approves structural coverage over 15 percent. Stoddard stated that he concurs with the 15 percent limit, noting that to reach the maximum 15 percent allowed, the Applicant could add 158 square feet of hardcover, and that he would like to see the Applicant try to reduce hardcover on this property. Page 12 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2493 KATHERINE TAYLOR HOMES, CONTINUED Hugh commented that she has reduced the size of the driveway. Hugh expressed frustration that the hardcover limit promotes outside storage of vehicles and other items. Lindquist stated that unfortunately hardcover needs to be limited somehow. Lindquist commented that a hardship needs to be imposed by the land, noting that a steep slope does exist. Hugh inquired whether she would be permitted to add 158 square feet of hardcover. Stoddard stated she would be allowed to add 158 square feet in structural coverage. Hugh inquired whether wood chips were okay. Hawn stated that wood chips are fine but that rock and plastic underiayment are considered hardcover. There were no public comments. Lindquist stated he would be in favor of the deck but not the garage. Hawn moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of the portion of Application #2493, 692 Tonkawa Road, to permit the construction of a deck above the attached garage over the existing hardcover, with an attached spiral staircase, and to grant a variance to the hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Hawn moved, Berg seconded, to recommend denial of the portion of Application #2493, 692 Tonkawa Road, to permit the construction of a two stall detached garage 30 feet from the right-of-way and 10 feet from the side lot line due to the structural coverage being in excess of 15 percent. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#10) #2494 DAN ANDERSEN, 2885 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY - VARIANCES, 8:48 p.m. - 8:58 P.lfl. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Dan Andersen was present. Lee Statman was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a variance for an undeveloped lot within the recently approved Little Orchard Addition. When the subdivision was approved, a stable remained on the lot located near the front yard setback line and encroaching into the required 30 foot side yard setback. It was the subdivider's intent that the building be removed; however, the Applicant has requested the stable be moved to a conforming location on the lot. The building would be relocated to the rear of the lot meeting all required yard setbacks. Weinberger stated a restrictive covenant would need to be placed over the lot for an oversized accessory building because it exceeds 1,000 square feet. The Applicant is also requesting that the City allow the west property line to be identified as a side Page 13 li ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2494 DAN ANDERSEN, CONTINUED lot line to allow a 30 foot setback rather than 50 feet as required for rear yards. When this subdivision was approved, the front yard was determined to be that portion of the lot adjacent to the cul-de-sac. The side yards are the south and eastern lot lines, and the lot has two identified rear lot lines, which are the west and north property lines. The Applicant is proposing to re-establish this property line as a side property line or, in essence, granting a variance to allow the 30 foot side yard setback. City Staff had a concern regarding the actual function of the lot if the westerly lot line is re-established and the house is constructed to face directly to the east and located directly on the setback line, this would then essentially serve as a rear yard. Weinberger indicated he has spoken with Dan Andersen regarding this and Mr. Andersen would like to see language included in the resolution recognizing that this is a side yard and shall function as such at the time the property is developed and a house is constructed on the lot. City Staff recommends approval of the variance to permit an accessory structure to remain on the property subject to the condition it is located as shown on the survey/site plan dated July 9,1998, and that the property owners file a covenant on the title for the oversized accessory building with the conditions noted in the Staff Report. City Staff is also recommending approval of the request to amend the Little Orchard plat to reclassify the west property line from a rear yard to a side yard based on the condition a house is constructed on the lot that will not orient a back yard to the west protecting the property to the west, and the front yard classification be extended to include the entire southern property line. Andersen stated the house will be situated to face at an angle. Andersen noted that the bam is in good condition and that is why they would like it to be relocated rather than removed. There were no public comments. Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2494, 2885 Little Orchard Way, granting a variance to permit an accessory structure to remain on the property subject to the condition it is located as shown on the survey/site plan dated July 9,1998 on file with the City of Orono, and the property owners file a covenant on the title for the oversized accessory building with the conditions noted in the May 17,1999 Staff Report, and to recommend approval of the request to amend the Little Orchard plat to reclassify the west property line from a rear yard to a side yard based on the condition a house is constructed on the lot that will not orient a back yard to the west protecting the property to the west, and the front yard classification be extended to include the entire southern property line. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (Recess taken at 8:58 p.m. • 9:01 p.m.) (#7) #2488 GREGG KLOHN, 4455 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES, 9:02 p.m. • 9:17 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Gregg Klohn was present. Page 14 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2488 GREGG KLOHN, CONTINUED Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to rebuild a garage that was damaged in the May, 1998 storm. The new garage would be constructed In the same area of the existing garage. The Applicant Is proposing to construct the new garage four feet wider and five feet longer than the existing garage, which would make it 14' by 24 ‘. Variances are required for side yard setback and rear yard setback. The existing and proposed garage is located within the 250-500' lakeshore setback. A variance was granted in 1998 for hardcover to be 35.1 percent instead of the allowed 30 percent. The Applicant then constructed an addition smaller than approved and removed a shed that was also located in this hardcover area. This reduced the hardcover to 32.8 percent. The proposed garage would increase the hardcover in this setback area to 35.3 percent. Weinberger stated that it is possible to locate the new garage in a spot that would meet the two side yard setbacks and that he would like the Applicant to respond to that possibility. The proposed side yard setback is three feet and the rear yard is 10.9 feet, which does meet the setback required. City Staff is recommending denial of the variance due to the fact that the new garage could be built on another location of the lot and be within all the setbacks. Klohn stated the existing garage was destroyed by the storm last year which has prompted his application tonight. Klohn commented that there are easements along North Shore Drive. Klohn stated that he would not need to request a variance if he replaces the existing garage, but he would like the garage door to face the street. Klohn remarked that the location proposed by Weinberger is viable but he has not considered that possibility before tonight. Klohn stated that if he constructed a garage in that location, the roof of the garage would be located close to the ground and might not look as appealing as a garage that matches the house. Klohn stated if the garage is constructed into the hill, he would like to construct a 24' by 22' garage. Klohn requested that the Planning Commission approve his application as submitted. Lindquist indicated he agreed with Staffs recommendations. Hawn indicated she also was in agreement with Staff, noting that a two car garage would exceed hardcover and possibly structural coverage. Weinberger commented that the property could handle more structural coverage, noting that this proposal would bring it up to approximately 10 percent. Klohn commented that he could perhaps construct a deck on top of the garage if it was located into the hill. Klohn stated that it would probably still require a variance to the side yard setback. Lindquist stated that it could be located ten feet from the side yard setback. Klohn remarked that in his opinion it would probably be 6.5 feet. Hawn stated that this application would probably be denied as presented, and inquired whether the Applicant would like the Planning Commission to table this application to allow him additional time to review his options. Page 15 •S ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2488 GREGG KLOHN, CONTINUED Klohn stated he would like the application to be tabled. Hawn Inquired whether he would be willing to waive the 60 day time limit. Klohn indicated that would be fine. Berg moved, Hawn seconded, to table Application #2488,4455 North Shore Drive, to allow the Applicant time to submit revised plans, and to extend the 60 day time limit to 120 days. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW (#11) #2490 CHARLES AND SUE VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH • SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Charles Van Eeckhout was present. Gaffron stated the Applicants are requesting to subdivide a 20 acre parcel to create nine sewered building sites ranging from 1.0 acre to 1.8 acres in area. This proposal would require rezoning the area from RR-1B, Single Family, 2 Acre, to R-1A, Single Family, 1 acre; extension of the sanitary sewer from the City of Long Lake; expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area; variances to the back lot ordinance; creation of a private road in a substandard corridor; variances to iot width: creation of a shared driveway crossing of Long Lake Creek; construction of a road or driveway through at least two delineated wetiands; creation of a wetland outlet for Park; and construction of an 800 foot private driveway extending from the private road to serve Lot 4. Charles Van Eeckhout stated that he has owned the property for the past 29 years. Van Eeckhout stated that he has done other subdivisions within the City of Orono and has made it a point to avoid the need for variances as much as possible. Before purchase of this property. Van Eeckhout commented that he checked with the City of Orono regarding what regulations existed regarding possible subdivision of this arec and that this proposal encompasses essentially what he was told he could do at that time. Van Eeckhout stated that in 1975, the City rezoned this area, which changed this area from a one acre density to two acre, and that rezoning should be considered as a taking of value, and that this property should be allowed to be developed under one acre standards as he was originally told. Van Eeckhout remarked that he did not receive any compensation for the taking, which in his opiniop d«K:reased the value of his property. Van Eeckhout noted that a lot of new rules and regulations have been adopted by the City over the years, and requested that the Planning Commission rezone this area bacl< what it originally was at the time of purchase. Gaffron commented that the City of Oui io would disagree with the opinion that the rezoning was a taking. Van Eeckhout stated that he has quarter acre ict.« to the north adjacent to his property, one acre lots on the northwest, and one acre lots to the south, and wetlands to the east. Van Eeckhout remarked that in essence his property was spot zoned at the time the area was rezoned. Van Eeckhout commented that this subdivision would contain one acre lots, which in his opinion are Page 16 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2490 CHARLES AND SUE VAN EECKHOUT. CONTINUED sufficient lots, noting that two acre lots would cost more, and that due to environmental concerns because of its location by Long Lake Creek, this area should be connected to City sewer. A large number of trees also exist on the property which cannot be cut down. Van Eeckhout stated that he would like to have a forester out there to review the situation to determine whether some of the trees can be cut down to help the undergrowth grow back. Van Eeckhout stated he is willing to work with City Staff on these issues. Lindquist remarked that he understands Van Eeckhout's position on the taking, but that is an issue for the City Council. Lindquist commented that in his opinion this area should remain zoned at two acres. Hawn stated she is in agreement with Lindquist and that the Planning Commission does not do rezoning. Hawn remarked that this area might be a potential site for a PRD and might lend itself to some cluster development. Van Eeckhout commented that in his opinion under this sketch plan there is sufficient spacing for the proposed residences, noting that he would not have a problem with doing a PUD on this area as he has presented it tonight. Stoddard stated that he also concurs that this is an issue for the City Council to determine, noting that the Planning Commission is a recommending body and it does not appear that the Planning Commission would recommend rezonIng of this area. Stoddard remarked that the City also needs to make a determination on whether this area should be includca in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. Hawn noted that this application is driven by whether or not the Applicant can rezone this property and that issue should be resolved first before further consideration‘s given to this sketch plan. Gaffron stated that the area south of the Luce Line is zoned two acres, noting that Fox Ridge was developed back in the 1960s. Stoddard commented that the Applicant will also need to determine the type of wetlands that exist on the properly. Van Eeckhout stated that in his opinion this area is incorrectly zoned wetland and he has farmed the wetland area on a regular basis. Van Eeckhout remarked that the wetland is six feet above the water level. Van Eeckhout commented that in his opinion this area can adequately support nine structures. Lindquist stated that in his opinion this area will probably remain zoned at two acres. Hawn noted that it has was the consensus of the Planning Commission in a meeting regarding the comprehensive plan not to extend sanitary sewer to prevent denser housing. Hawn suggested the Applicant look at a PRD. Van Eeckhout noted that a PRD would require extension of the sewer. Hawn stated that a PRD probably would require extension of the sewer. Page 17 [•iWTira# Nflil^ fl^•rtTIiTW LM*irafnw •IfV^il il3TO •low [•JM*Iin[5Fitira [triTRTi^ •IhT:•riiinm FflWfHiriiiWn Ri •iriTtWi] •]l ■•Ti1 MU?iVili iic4: M.•Iftra Wlll*TTiTO •liTltR •ra;T«tTir«nfTt^ tlftTfl •TlTlWra LMIk^iki[tH¥tnrs»fSl •MtUI •miT* •Wi#1 •urn^•iriri¥:i •hTi» um^it^nrr^ rfi«ji([«]iVfi rwira ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2491 DEBORAH SHOLL. CONTINUED It is City Staffs conclusion that the property should support additional residential lots in the future to the west if an access road is added and suitable septic sites are iocated. The concern is the use of the oversized arena and bam on a 12 acre farm rather than the existing 37 acres. Sholl stated she would like to subdivide this property, noting that the barn and arena are presently being leased and riding lessons are provided. Sholl commented that a septic report has been submitted and that she has replaced one septic system for the residence located on Orchard Park. A plan has been submitted for a second septic site for the existing main house which would be located withir: the proposed lot line. Sholl remarked that tt:e bam is able to hold 16 horses and she has some people that are interested in using the property as a horse farm. They are looking to house approximately five to sue horses at this time. They are not interested in purchasing the whole parcel. Stoddard inquired when the bam and arena were constructed. Sholl stated that the bam is approximately 75 to 80 years old and the bam was added on in approximately 1970. The arena was constructed in 1970. Lindquist inquired if the property located on Orchard Road was being rented. Sholl stated the house is being rented at this time. Lindquist inquired whether Orchard Road would be split off. Sholl remarked that it is not her intention at this time to split that parcel off. Lindquist commented that the accessory structures raise several issues with this application as well as leaving the residence on Orchai^ Road, noting that he probably would not approve it the way it is being presented. Sholl stated that building is taxed as non-homestead. Lindquist stated that he does not have a problem with the bam, arena and house, but that the use of the buildings may pose a problem. Lindquist stated the property on Orchnrri P:'sd sh:. be split into two parcels or the buildings should be removed. Hawn commented that adequate pasture land is required for the housing of horses. Stoddard suggested that the Applicant meet with City Staff to discuss these issues, noting that if the Applicant wishes to keep the guest house, she will need to make that conforming and the Applicant will also need to determine how many horses will be housed on that propeity in order to calculate the appropriate number of acres. Lindquist commented that the Applicant should meet with City Staff to help bring this sketch plan into conformance with City Codes. Sholl commented that the bam and arena have been grandfathered in to her knowledge. Gaffron stated that once the lot lines a; a changed, the buildings may need to be removed or reduced, noting that he would need to obtain the opinion of the City Attorney to verify whether these Page 19 I ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 #2491 DEBORAH SHOLL, CONTINUED buildings are grandfathered in. Weinberger stated that there have been other applications regarding this property and all have been tabled due to the issues regarding the accessory buildings as they relate to the property lines. Sholl inquired whether a condition could be imposed on this prope. 'iy that no conditional use permit would be issued. Gaffron commented that a future City Council could change that condition if they so desired. Hawn commented that the horse farm Tits in with the character of Orono and that the Applicant should consider additional acreage for the housing of horses. Charles Kelley, Council Member, stated that in the past when this bam and arena were used for horse shows, parking along Watertown Road was a problem. Kelley commented that the environmental issues regarding the disposal of the waste from the horses should also be addressed. Sholl stated that presently the waste is hauled away and is stored temporarily on the eastern side of the property. Stoddard stated that the Applicant vnll need to make a determination on whether to keep the guest house along with a determination on how many horses will be housed there. Lindquist remarked that the Applicant should meet with City Staff and review the variances required to see if any of them could be avoided. Gaffron stated that the conditional use permit was based on the entire 37 acres being considered one parcel. Sholl commented that she would like to keep the bam, arena, and house on one lot. Sholl noted that if 21 or 22 acres are needed to keep that as one lot, she may not proceed vrith the subdivision. Gaffron stated that the City ’s table regarding oversized accessory structures does not go beyond 6,000 square feet and that number will need to be calculated. Kelley stated the Applicant will need to make a determination on whether she wishes to keep the commercial use of this property, which will require more acreage, or to give up the commercial use and go with fewer acres. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Items #13 and 14 follow Item 16. (#15) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR APRIL 19.1999. Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to approve the minutes of the Regular Planning Commission meeting of April 19,1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Page 20 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 17,1999 (#16) SELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ON MAY 24,1999, AND JUNE 14.1999. May 24,1999 - Berg June 14,1999 - Stoddard (#14) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Hawn reminded the Planning Commission members of the upcoming housing seminar on Thursday. Gaffron stated that three Planning Commission members have indicated that they will be attending this seminar. Gaffron remarked that a study was conducted last year of 12 cities and has different options that the City of Orono may want to review. Berg commented that she serves on a committee that addressed affordable housing and has not seen any study. Gaffron stated that this study does not specifically address affordable housing but housing needs in general for this area. ADJOURNMENT Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 10:30 p.m. Elizabeth Hawn, Chair Person i Page 21 REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 05/03/99 PERMIT TYPE Building SOL FAMILY-NEW DUPLEX-NEW SP-ADD/REMODBL SP-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COMMERCIAL-NEW com-aod/remcdel COM-ACC STRUCTUR INST-ADD/REMODEL DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING WOOD STOVE/FLUE FIREPLACE VENTILATION FUEL STORAGE GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-total Plumbing FIXTURES SPRINKLER WATER METER VACUUM BREAKER Sub-total Sewer fc Water SEWER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE DRNPLD &/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEWER DISCONNECT SEWER REPAIR SEWER ft WATER Sub-total Sign PERMANENT/POSTED TEMPORARY Sub-total Fire FIRE SPRINKLER QTY 13 1 57 7 6 1 3 0 1 1 1 91* COUNCIL MEETIHQ YEAR-TO-DATE ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OP ORONO ***** JUN 1 4 »99 PAGE: 1 t ur UlieWUlESTER: CAROLE -- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/99 - 04/30/99 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/98 - 04/30/98 BASE FEE 24,878 1,637 17,621 1,182 360 3,099 1,134 0 74 30 199 50,217 .25 .25 .75 .00 .00 .75 .25 .00 .75 .00 .75 .75* VALUATION 4,136,949.55 250.000. 00 1,751,126.00 78.700.00 0.00 550.000. 00 92.900.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 12.600.00 6,875,275.55* PLAN REVIEW 16,050 1,064 7,423 662 0 2,014 688 0 0 0 129 28,034 .10 .21 .83 .85 .00 .84 .68 .00 .00 .00 .84 .35* QTY 10 0 94 4 6 0 3 2 1 2 4 126* BASE FEB 21,347 0 27,294 3,294 300 0 359 870 0 60 832 54,359 .50 .00 .75 .00 .00 .00 .50 .50 .00 .00 .75 .00* VALUATION 3,492,774.00 0.00 2,676,239.84 448,300.00 0.00 0.00 22.075.00 69,000.00 19.480.00 0.00 56.500.00 6,784,368.84* PLAN REVIEW 13,875.85 0.00 12,593.24 2,141.10 0.00 0.00 15.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 541.28 29,166.91* 4J 5,336.76 413,719.00 0.00 33 5,618.38 443,415.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 321.82 25,745.52 0.00 1 37.50 3,000.00 0.00 1 35.00 2,000.00 0.00 24 1,001.89 52,796.00 0.00 32 1,263.31 68,565.00 0.00 4 197.50 11,700.00 0.00 3 105.00 5,150.00 0.00 1 312.50 25,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 215.00 8,000.00 0.00 3 105.00 1,875.00 0.00 2 128.75 8,700.00 0.00 9 328.75 15,333.00 0.00 1 35.00 1,450.00 0.00 1 35.00 500.00 0.00 01*7,264.90*524,365.00*0.00*86*7,812.26*562,583.52*0.00* 49 5,019.66 351,753.00 0.00 59 5,247.14 380,744.00 0.00 1 93.75 7,500.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 440.00 0.00 0.00 4 932.00 0.00 0.00 1 240.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 54*5,793.41*359,253.00*0.00*63*6,179.14*380,744.00*. 0.00* 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 12 420.00 0.00 0.00 5 370.00 0.00 0.00 8 800.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 2 2,100.00 0.00 0.00 10 8,250.00 • 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 105.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 140.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 15*2,820.00*0.00*0.00*31*9,520.00*0.00*0.00* 1 48.50 1,500.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1* 0.00 48.50* 0.00 1,500.00* 0.00 0.00* 1 1* 35.00 35.00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00* 2 1,409.00 20,600.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 RBPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 05/03/99 YEAR-TO-DATE *****PERMIT ISSUED REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO PAGE: REQUESTER: CAROLE -- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/99 - 04/30/99 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/98 - 04/30/98 1 PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE Sxib-total 2*1,409.00*20,680.00*0.00*0*0.00* User Defined __ LAND ALTERATION 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 4 uu LANN SPRINKLER 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 Sub-total 3*120.00*0.00*• 0.00*5*260.00* Grand-total 247**67,673.56**7,781,073.55**28,034.35**312**78,165.40** VALUATION 0.00* PLAN REVIEW 0.00* 500.00 0.00 500.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 7,728,196.36** 29,166.91** ' ' * ♦ I .rWf) i YEAR-TO-DATE REPORT NBR. BFBERPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 05/03/99 BASE PEE PLAN REVIEW SURCaiARGE Lie. SEARCH PEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL BUILDING 50,217.75 28,034.35 3,422.01 0.00 4.200.00 4.090.00 0.00 0.00 89,964.11 ***** PERMIT PEE REPORT ***** CITY OP ORONO PROM 01/01/99 TO 04/30/99 MECHANICAL 7,264.90 0.00 263.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.62 0.00 7,602.99 PLUMBING 5,793.41 0.00 183.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.50 0.00 6,005.15 SEWER & HATER 2,820.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,826.50 USER 120.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 122.50 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE SIGN 48.50 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.25 FIRE 1,409.00 . • 0.00 133.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 1,543.84 REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 05/03/99 BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEB SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL REPORT TOTAL 67,673.56 28,034.35 4,010.31 0.00 4.200.00 4.090.00 0.00 106.12 0.00 108,114.34 ***** permit fee report ***** CITY OF ORONO PROM 01/01/99 TO 04/30/99 PAGE: 2 REQUESTER: CAROLE YEAR-TO-DATE i f- REPORT NBR. BPBERPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 05/03/99 REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 05/03/99 TO 13 n« MO’ ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO *****1 REQUESTER: RANGE ------------ PAGE: 1 CAROLE PERMIT TYPE QTY 01/01/99 - BASE FEE XVmVVjEi -------- 04/30/99 VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY 01/01/98 - BASE FEE 04/30/98 VALUATION PLAN • REVIEW User Defined SUBDIVISION 8 5,400.00 0.00 0.00 7 4,487.50 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE 11 2,750.00 0.00 0.00 24 6,660.00 0.00 0.00 COP 4 925.00 0.00 0.00 6 1,275.00 0.00 0.00 SKETCH PLAN 4 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 2 500.00 0.00 0.00 VARIANCE/CUP 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 500.00 0.00 0.00 REZONING 1 350.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 RQST SIMILAR USE 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 ZONING CODE AMEN 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 30*10,425.00*0.00*0.00*42*13,422.50*0.00*0.00* Grand-total 30**10,425.00**0.00**o.oo**42**13,422.50**0.00**0.00** PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OP ORONO FROM 01/01/99 TO 04/30/99 ***** USER REPORT TOTAL BASE PEE 10,425.00 10,425.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL •10,425.00 10,425.00 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE 1999 RECAP OF CONTRACT CITIES January February_Harch Apr! I June July August Septeiifeer October Hoveaber Deceatoer YTD Totals Spring Park _ __ Plan RevieM 40.46 274.14 0.00 2,760.22 Inspections 120.00 45.00 195.00 135.00 495.00 Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 100.00 TOTAL 185.46 344.14 220.00 2,920.22 3|669.82 No. Plan Reviens 1 1 0 4 6 No. Inspections 6 3 13 9 33 Minnetonka Beach _ __ Plan Review 568.59 0.00 72.96 326.79 Inspectiors 60.00 45.00 150.00 135.00 390.00 Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 100.00 TOTAL 653.59 70.00 247.96 486.79 If458.34 No. Plan Reviews 1 0 1 1 3 No. Inspections 4 3 10 9 26 839.05 414.14 467.96 3,407.01 • :.w REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 05/03/99 PERMIT TYPE Building SQL FAMILY-NEW DUPLEX-NEW SF-ADD/REMODEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COM-ADD/REMODEL COM-ACC STRUCTUR ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING WOOD STOVE/FLUE FIREPLACE VENTILATION DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-total Plumbing FIXTURES WATER METER VACUUM BREAKER Sub-total Sewer & Water SEWER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE DRNFLD &/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEWER REPAIR Sub-total Sign PERMANBNT/POSTED Sub-total User Defined LAND ALTERATION LAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total Grand-total QTY 3 1 20 3 0 1 0 1 29* 4 0 1 6 1 2 1 15* 13 2 1 16* 1 2 0 1 2 6* 1 1* 0 2 2* 69** ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO -- CURRENT RANGE - 04/01/99 - 04/30/99 BASE FEE 5,876.75 1.637.25 7.469.25 434.25 0.00 484.75 0.00 199.75 16,102.00* 520.63 0.00 37.50 370.64 71.25 128.75 35.00 1,163.77* 1,373.41 310.00 240.00 1,923.41* 35.00 200.00 0.00 1,050.00 70.00 1,355.00* 48.50 48.50* 0.00 70.00 70.00* VALUATION 942.500.00 250,000.00 885.483.00 27.000. 00 0.00 40.000. 00 0.00 12,600.00 2,157,583.00* 40.685.00 0.00 3,000.00 23.951.00 5.700.00 8.700.00 1.450.00 83,486.00* 99,523.00 0.00 0.00 99,523.00* 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 r? 00 00* 1,500.00 1,500.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 20,662.68** 2,342,092.00** PLAN REVIEW 3,819.88 1,064.21 2,317.25 282.27 0.00 315.09 0.00 129.84 7,928.54* 00 00 00 00 00 00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00* 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00* 7,928.54** ** ** * QTY 2 0 38 1 2 2 1 3 49* 6 2 0 6 0 2 117* 15 0 0 15* 4 5 1 3 0 13* 0 0* 2 0 2* 96** APRIL 1999 JUK \ 4 1999 C DlkMrSC*_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 'I PAGE: -- PREVIOUS RANGE 04/01/98 - 04/30/98 BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 3,974.50 640,000.00 2,583.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,363.25 869,011 84 3,482.87 394.75 30,000.00 256.59 100.00 0.00 0.00 72.25 2,075.00 15.44 394.75 30,000.00 0.00 545.50 36,500.00 354.57 L4,845.00*1,607,586.84*6,692.89* 693.94 54,160.00 0.00 135.57 10,845.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 11,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 3,133.00 0.00 35.00 500.00 0.00 1,144.51*80,338.52*0.00* 892.50 56,275.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 892.50*56,275.00*0.00* 140.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 2,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,940.00*0.00*0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00*0.00*0.00* 100.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00*500.00*0.00* 19,922.01**1,744,700.36**6,692.89* • REPORT NBR. BPEERPTl-1 DATE OP RUN 05/03/99 •BUILDING BASE PEE 16,102.00 PLAN REVIEW 7,928.54 SURCHARGE 1,078.90 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 SAC 1,050.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 HAIL IN ESCROW 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 26,159.44 REPORT NBR. BFEERPTl-1 DATE OP RUN 05/03/99 BASE FEE REPORT TOTAL 20,662.68 PLAN REVIEW 7,928.54 SURCHARGE 1,175.29 Lie. SEARCH FEB 0.00 SAC 1,050.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 MAIL IN 18.00 ESCROW 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 30,834.51 APRIL 1999 ***** MECHANICAL 1,163.77 0.00 41.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 1,214.53 PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 04/01/99 TO 04/30/99 ***** PLUMBING SEWER & WATER 1,923.41 0.00 50.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 1,981.29 1,355.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,357.50 ** PERMIT FEB REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 04/01/99 TO 04/30/99 ***** USER 70.00 . 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 72.50 PAOBt 31 REQUESTER: CAROLE SIGN FIRE 48.50 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.25 0.00 0.00 PAGE: 32 REQUESTER: CAROLE Ai ■ r.M6 MON, ^lAY 3, x999, 4:57 PM PAGE 1 PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 1999 PERMIT KuRK ADDR NBR STREET ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION 29C MB 15C 01 3290 NORTH SHORE DR 01 3290 NAVARRE LA 01 2845 WEAR CIR 01 140 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 04 1216 NORTH ARM DR 04 2253 BAYVIEW PL 05 1930 WEST FARM RD 06 122 CHEVY CHASE DR 06 2794 CASCO POINT RD 06 650 NORTH ARM DR 09 575 OXFORD RD 11 2620 KELLY AVE 11 1120 WILLOW DR S 11 1127 LOMA LINDA AVE 11 2650 KELLY AVE 11 200 LEAF ST 11 80 HACKBERRY HILL 11 2705 ETHEL AVE 19 1050 TAMARACK DR 29 485 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 29 4330 NORTH SHORE DR 29 3460 NORTH SHORE DR 29 1820 POX ST 29 315 TONKAWA RD 29 3877 SHORELINE DR 29 3020 NORTH SHORE DR 29 940 BROWN RD S 30 945 COX FARM RD 30 1535 BOHNS PT RD 29C 01 1535 BOHNS PT RD 01 1390 SHADYWOOD RD 01 ?-400 FOX ST 01 2697 KELLY AVE 01 1495 GREEN TREES RD 01 45 CRISTOFORI CIR 01 4465 FOREST LAKE LANDING 01 1315 TONKAWA RD 01 2845 WEAR CIR 01 2697 KELLY AVE 01 1300 SHORELINE DR 01 3568 BAYSIDE RD 01 185 CYGNET PL 02 2315 DEVIN LA 24 2205 SHADYWOOD RD 15C 01 2697 KELLY AVE 01 3510 BAYSIDE RD 01 45 CRISTOFORI CIR 01 1770 WEST FARM RD 01 123 CHEVY CHASE DR 01 800 BROWN RD S 99/04/06 OR- 99/04/16 OR- 99/04/21 OR- 99/04/30 OR- 99/04/16 OR- 99/04/28 OR- 99/04/12 OR- 99/04/16 OR- 99/04/01 OR- 99/04/21 OR- 99/04/02 OR- 99/04/08 OR- 99/04/14 OR- 99/04/14 OR- 99/04/26 OR- 99/04/26 OR- 99/04/28 OR- 99/04/29 OR- 99/04/23 OR- 99/04/02 OR- 99/04/02 OR- 99/04/08 OR- 99/04/09 OR- 99/04/29 OR- 99/04/13 OR- 99/04/19 OR- 99/04/29 OR- 99/04/21 OR- 99/04/29 OR- 011311 011331 011343 011362 011332 011360 011317 010780 011301 011335 011298 011315 011327 011328 011352 011353 011364 011365 011342 011300 011303 011306 011316 011318 011321 011333 011366 011336 011368 99/04/01 99/04/01 99/04/06 99/04/19 99/04/19 99/04/19 99/04/20 99/04/21 99/04/21 99/04/26 99/04/27 99/04/27 99/04/30 99/04/13 99/04/23 99/04/05 99/04/06 99/04/12 99/04/12 99/04/14 99/04/14 OR-011299 OR-011302 OR-011309 OR-011337 OR-011338 OR-011339 OR-011340 OR-011344 OR-011346 OR-011354 OR-011358 OR-011359 OR-011369 OR-011322 OR-011348 OR-011308 OR-011310 OR-011319 OR-011320 OR-011326 OR-011330 00000000 00000000 00000000 14754902 00000000 16450331 14791834 19203306 00000000 14742376 19332255 18948415 18238046 18530049 12702142 15410304 15935325 00000000 14893696 14445353 00000000 14725052 14445353 14750548 00000000 14961146 00000000 19341492 00000000 35453797 35421166 36332561 34347747 34432819 22346900 34282826 36332561 35453797 35712525 34775505 35350194 34477185 35421166 37816901 24796715 29296767 22346900 24340445 24248455 29337200 PILLAR HOMES SUSSEL CORPORATION NOREEN CONSTRUCTION ROOS-FRICK INC PATRICK HANILY & ASSOC INC CUSTOM POOLS INC UNITED CONSTRUCTION INC SELA ROOFING RIGHT WAY HOME EXTERIORS WESTURN CEDAR SUPPLY ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC PINEVIEW BUILDERS INC YERIGAN CONSTRUCTION CO RAYMOND BAYLOR YERIGAN CONSTRUCTION CO JENSEN HOMES IMKER CONST CLASSIC STRUCTURES INC FIREPLACE CENTER FLARE HTG & AC FIRESIDE CORNER AIR MECHAf:iCAL, INC. NARKIE HTG & AC INC B & C PLUMBING PRACTICAL SYSTEMS FIRESIDE CORNER FIREPLACE CENTER AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO K & K HEATING & PLUMBING DEAN'S TANK OIL STATEWIDE GAS SERVICES INC FLARE HTG & AC DAVES APPL HTG & AIR KINGSWAY PLUMBING NEU PLUMBING B & C PLUMBING CLEARWATER SYSTEMS MACK PLUMBING CULLIGAN WAADB 250,000.00 JOHNSON 274,000.00' YOUNG 200,000.00 •468,500.00 DURKIN 15,000.00 LEWIN 12,600.00 PETERSON 26,000.00 CARLSON 7,600.00 QUINN 800.00 BRACHLE 24,000.00 STARK 15,000.00 SCOTT 10,720.00 GRAUNKE 4,300.00 ROTH 4,057.00 HOOK 10,300.00 BELLAMY 10,677.00 MOCK 4,279.00 PILLAR 1,900.00 40,000.00 HAMM 480,000.00 LOPEZ 3,000.00 CLOUD 1,850.00 MACMILLAN 75,000.00 BENNETT 150,000.00 GREGORY 1,000.00 SWENSON 50,000.00 JOHNSTON 5,000.00 SANFORD 11,000.00 BORN 1,000.00 BORN 1,000.00 MASLOW 1,200.00 OLSON 12,000.00 4,900.00 BRASS 3,950.00 30,000.00 BLACKSTONE 1.400.00 1.100.00 YOUNG 3,000.00 •6,451.00 HOWARD 7,500.00 BARTLETT 1,450.00 EZELL 2,000.00 OSTROM 5,700.00 HULST 1,835.00 6,600.00 MORRISON 14,209.00 20,000.00 2,400.00 STRAUMAN 11,500.00 VICKERMAN 500.00% MON, MAY 3, 1999, 4:57 PM PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET 1999 ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBEI PL 01 4355 BAYSIDE RD 99/04/26 OR-011350 28947600 01 1300 SHORELINE DR 99/04/27 OR-011357 24775505 02 1890 SHADYWOOD RD 99/04/21 OR-011345 24701208 02 2315 DEVIN LA 99/04/27 OR-011363 24422618 03 2190 WAYZATA BLVD 99/04/1°^R-''11334 24242646 09 500 TONKAWA RD 99/04/i.oR-011355 24724959 24 746 TONKAWA RD 99/04/14 OR-011329 28274033 24 135 LUCE LINE RIDGE 99/04/29 OR-011367 24490147 29 3433 LIVINGSTON AVE 99/04/05 OR-011305 2'’972031 1€C 29 3100 16C RIDGEWOOD CIR 99/04/26 OR-011349 28274033 SI 1C 13 2385 1C SHADYWOOD RD 99/04/02 OR-011297 19337730 SW 01 3433 LIVINGSTON AVE 99/04/05 OR-011304 24972031 01 1655 BOHNS PT RD 99/04/08 OR-011314 24724959 01 1509 LONG LAKE BLVD 99/04/13 OR-011324 00000000 01 1509 LONG LAKE BLVD 99/04/13 OR-011325 54734300 01 2845 WEAR CIR 99/04/30 OR-011370 54793364 €C 19 1050 6C TAMARACK DR 99/04/23 OR-011347 54789529 UD 01 1205 SHORELINE DR 99/04/13 OR-011323 00000000 2C 69C 01 2265 2C NORTH SHORE DR 9f/04/23 OR'011341 86840222 PAGE 2 COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION LAKESIDE PLBG & HTG INC 14,564.00 K & K HTG & PLBG, INC HOWARD 21,000.00 STBINKRAUS PLBG INC MASLOW 1,300.00 SULLIVAN BOB PLBG PORTMANN 5,000.00 BREDAHL PLBG • .00 WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS NELSON .00 NORBLOM PLUMBING CO CALDWELL 500.00 CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC.ANDERSON 750.00 M & D PLBG & HTG INC GOSPETER .00 NORBLOM PLUMBING CO CASHIN 1,000.00 ATTRACTA SIGN INC SHIELDS 1,500.00 M & D PLBG & HTG INC GOSPWRWB .00 WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS NEWMAN .00 CASHMAN . 00 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE CASHMAN .00 INDEPENDENT SEPTIC SYSTEMS YOUNG .00 G L CONTRACTING INC .00 DEHOFP .00 HOME SERSVICE IRRIGATION MURPHEY .00 2,342<092.00* r MON, MAY 3, *999, 4:56 PM NUMERICAL LISTING APRIL 1999 PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 1 WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION OR-010780 OR-011297 OR-011298 OR-011299 OR-011300 OR-011301 OR-011302 OR-011303 OR-0113C4 OR-011305 OR-011306 OR-011308 OR-011309 OR-011310 OR-011311 OR-011314 OR-011315 OR-011316 OR-011317 OR-011318 OR-011319 OR-011320 OR-011321 OR-011322 OR-011323 OR-011324 OR-011325 OR-011326 OR-011327 OR-011328 OR-011329 OR-011330 OR-011331 OR-011332 OR-011333 OR-011334 OR-011335 OR-011336 OR-011337 OR-011338 OR-011339 OR-011340 OR-011341 (Ht-011342 OR-011343 Ok-011344 OR-011345 OR-011346 OR-011347 OR-011348 OR-011349 OR-011350 OR-011352 OR-011353 99/04/16 N 99/04/02 N 99/04/02 N 99/04/01 N 99/04/02 N 99/04/01 N 99/04/01 N 99/04/02 N 99/04/05 N 99/04/05 N 99/04/08 N 99/04/05 N 99/04/06 N 99/04/06 N 99/04/06 N 99/04/08 N 99/04/08 N 99/04/09 N 99/04/12 N 99/04/29 N 99/04/12 N 99/04/12 N 99/04/13 N 99/04/13 N 99/04/13 N 99/04/13 N 99/04/13 N 99/04/14 N 99/04/14 N 99/04/14 N 99/04/14 N 99/04/14 N 99/04/16 N 99/04/16 N 99/04/19 N 99/04/19 N 99/04/21 N 99/04/21 N 99/04/19 N 99/04/19 N 99/04/19 N 99/04/20 N 99/04/23 N 99/04/23 N 99/04/21 N 99/04/21 N 99/04/21 N 99/04/21 N 99/04/23 N 99/04/23 N 99/04/26 N 99/04/26 N 99/04/26 N 99/04/26 N 122 2385 575 1535 485 2794 1890 4330 3433 3433 34 2697 3400 3510 3290 1655 2620 1820 1930 315 45 1770 3877 2315 1205 1509 1509 123 1120 1127 746 800 3290 1216 3020 2190 650 945 2697 1495 45 4465 2265 1050 2845 1315 1890 2845 1050 2205 3100 4355 2650 200 CHEVY CHASE DR 06 SHADYWOOD RD 13 OXFORD RD 09 BOHNS PT RD 01 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 29 CASCO POINT RD 06 SHADYWOOD RD 01 NORTH SHORE DR 29 LIVINGSTON AVE 01 LIVINGSTON AVE 29 NORTH SHORE DR 29 KELLY AVE 01 FOX ST 01 BAYSIDE RD 01 NORTH SHORE DR 01 BOHNS PT RD 01 KELLY AVE H FOX ST 29 WEST FARM RD 05 TONKAWA RD 29 CRISTOFORI CIR 01 WEST FARM RD 01 SHORELINE DR 29 DEVIN LA 02 SHORELINE DR 01 LONG LAKE BLVD 01 LONG LAKE BL'/D 01 CHEVY CHASE DR 01 WILLOW DR S 11 LOMA LINDA AVE 11 TONKAWA RD 24 BROWN RD S 01 NAVARRE LA 01 NORTH ARM DR 04 NORTH SHORE DR 29 WAYZATA BLVD 03 NORTH ARM DR 06 COX FARM RD 30 KELLY AVE 01 GREEN TREES RD 01 CRISTOFORI CIR 01 FOREST LAKE LANDING 01 NORTH SHORE DR 01 TAMARACK DR 19 WEAR CIR 01 TONKAWA RD 01 SHADYWOOD RD 02 WEAR CIR 01 TAMARACK DR 19 SHADYWOOD RD 24 RIDGEWOOD CIR 29 BAYSIDE RD 01 KELLY AVE 11 LEAF ST 11 19203306 19337730 19332255 35453797 14445353 00300000 35421166 00000000 24972031 24972031 14725052 24796715 36332561 29296767 00000000 24724959 18948415 14445353 14791834 14750548 22346900 24340445 00000000 35421166 00000000 00000000 54734300 24248455 18238046 18530049 28274033 29337200ooor>Ouuooooooooo 14961146 24242646 14742376 19341492 34347747 34432819 22346900 34282826 86840222 14893696 00000000 36332561 24701208 35453797 54789529 37816901 28274033 28947600 12702142 15410304 ROOS-FRICK INC ATTRACTA SIGN INC CUSTOM POOLS INC FIREPLACE CENTER YERIGAN CONSTRUCTION CO FLARE HTG & AC M & D PLBG & HTG INC M & D PLBG & HTG INC RAYMOND BAYLOR KINGSWAY PLUMBING FIRESIDE CORNER NEU PLUMBING WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS UNITED CONSTRUCTION INC YERIGAN C-ONSTRUCTION CO NOREEN CONSTRUCTION JENSEN HOMES B & C PLUMBING CLEARWATER SYSTEMS FLARE HTG & AC SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE MACK PLUMBING SELA ROOFING RIGHT WAY NORBL(»I PLUMBING CO CULLIGAN IMKER CONST BREDAHL PLBG PATRICK HANILY & ASSOC INC CLASSIC STRUCTURES INC AIR MECHANICAL, INC. NARKIE HTG 6 AC INC B & C PLUMBING PRACTICAL SYSTEMS HOME SBRSVICE IRRIGATION PINEVIEW BUILDERS INC FIRESIDE CORNER STEINKRAUS PLBG INC FIREPLACE CENTER G L CONTRACTING INC DAVES APPL HTG & AIR NORBLOM PLUMBING CO LAKESIDE PLBG & HTG INC HOME EXTERIORS WFSTURN CEDAR SUPPLY CARLSON SHIELDS STARK BORN HAMM QUINN MASLOW LOPEZ GOSPWivWE GOSPETER CLOUD OLSON MORRISON WAADB NEWMAN SCOTT MACMILLAN PETERSON BENNETT GREGORY OSTROM DEHOFF CASHMAN CASHMAN STRAUMAN GRAUNKE ROTH CALDWELL VICKBRMAN JOHNSON DURKIN SWENSON BRACHLE SANFORD BRASS BLACKSTONB MURPHBY YOUNG MASLOW YOUNG HULST CASHIN HOOK BELLAMY 7.600.00 I, 500.00' 15.000. 00 1,000.00 480.000. 00 800.00 1.200.00 3.000. 00 .00 .00 1.850.00 6.800.00 12.000. 00 14.209.00 250.000. 00 .00 10.720.00 75.000. 00 26.000. 00 150.000. 00 20,000.00 2.400.00 1.000. 00 5.700.00 .00 .00 .00 11.500.00 4.300.00 4.057.00 500.00 500.00 274.000. 00 15.000. 00 50.000. 00 .00 24.000. 00 II, 000.00 4.900.00 3.950.00 30.000. 00 1.400.00 .00 40.000. 00 200.000. 00 1.100.00 1.300.00 3.000. 00 .00 1.835.00 1.000. 00 14.564.00 10.300.00 10.677.00 MON, MAY 3, 1999, 4:56 PM PAGE 2 NUMERICAL LISTING APRIL 1999 PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION OR-011354 OR-011355 OR-011357 OR-011358 OR-011359 OR-011360 OR-011362 OR-011363 OR-011364 OR-011365 OR-011366 OR-011367 OR-011368 OR-011369 OR-011370 69C 99/04/26 99/04/26 99/04/27 99/04/27 99/04/27 99/04/28 99/04/30 99/04/27 99/04/28 99/04/29 99/04/29 99/04/29 99/04/29 99/04/30 99/04/30 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 2697 500 1300 1300 3568 2253 140 2315 80 2705 940 135 1535 185 2845 KELLY AVE TONKAWA RD SHORELINE DR SHORELINE DR BAYSIDE RD BAYVIBW PL CRYSTAL CREEK R1 DEVIN LA HACKBERRY HILL ETHEL AVE BROWN RD S LUCE LINE RIDGE BOHNS PT RD CYGNET PL WEAR CIR 01 35712525 09 24724959 01 24775505 01 34775505 01 35350194 04 16450331 01 14754902 02 24422618 11 15935325 11 00000000 29 00000000 24 24490147 30 00000000 01 34477185 01 54793364 AUTOIATIC GARAGE DOOR CO WBSTONKA MBCH CONTRACTORS K & K HTG & PLBG, INC K & K HEATING & PLUMBING DEAN'S TANK OIL SUSSEL CORPORATION PILLAR HOMES SULLIVAN BOB PLBG ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC NELSON HOWARD HOWARD BARTLETT LEWIN CUSTOM PLUMBING, INC. STATEWIDE GAS SERVICES INC INDEPENDENT SEPTIC SYSTEMS PORTMANN MOCK PILLAR JOHNSTON ANDERSON BORN EZELL YOUNG 6.451.00 .00* 21,000.00 7.500.00 1.450.00 12,600.00 468,500.00 5,000.00 4.279.00 1.900.00 5,000.00 750.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 .00 01 Residence 24 Replacing Existing02Addition25Lifting Principal Residence03Garage/Attachftd 26 Well Abandonment04Garage/Detached ..27 Foundation Only05Porch28Temporary Trailer06Deck29Renovate/Remodel07Pence30Accessory Structure08Gazebo31Stairway to Lake09 *1 Pool 32 Retaining Wall10Re-side 33 Entrance Monuments11Re-roof 34 Tree Removal12Tennis Court 13 'Sign 14 Dock IS Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accessory Structure 18 Move 19 Commercial 20 Institutional 21 Storm Damage Repair 22 1-100 Cubic Yards 23 101 Cubic Yards or More • 99 Undefined 9999 lck :al use codes Undefined REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 05/03/99 PERMIT TYPE QTY User Defined SUBDIVISION VARIANCE COP SKETCH PLAN VARIANCE/CUP Sub-total 0 0 0 0 0 0* Grand-total 0** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 05/03/99 APRIL 1999 ***** permit issued REPORT CITY OF ORONO *****PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE -- CURRENT RANGE - 04/01/99 - 04/30/99 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 04/01/98 - 04/30/98 BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE 0.00 0.00 j.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 1 5 3 2 1 12* 425.00 1,300.00 475.00 500.00 250.00 2,950.00* 0.00**0.00**0.00**12**2,950.00** ***** permit fee REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 04/01/99 TO 04/30/99 USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 0.00 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEB 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 0.00 0.00 VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00**0.00** PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE