Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-10-1999 Council Packet
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MAY 10,1999,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. COUNCIL MEETING 6:30 P.M. RECONVENED BC VRD OF REVIEW MAY 1 0 1999 ClTYOl^HOlig______ 6:45 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION CANDIDATE INTERVIEWS ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA 1.Approve/Amend APPROVAL OF MINUTES ♦2. RegularCouncilMeetingof April 26, 1999 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Van Erickson, Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 3.#2466 James Renckens, 3020 Watertown Road - Request for Reconsideration of Subdivision Application 4.#2477 George W. Stickney, 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road - Preliminary Plat - Resolution 5.#2480 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Preliminary Plat - Resolution 6.#2481 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixti: Avenue North - Rezoning - Ordinance 7.#2482 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - CUP for Guest House - Resolution 8.#2495 Steven Bohl, Bohland Development, 1025 Brown Road South - Final Plat - Resolution 9.Expiration of Moratorium on LR-lC-1 Density Credit - Ordinance MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT ENGINEER REPORT 10.Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Project A.Resolution Declaring Cost to be Assessed, and to Order Preparation of Proposed Assessment B.Resolution to Schedule Hearing on Proposed Assessment 11.Webber Hills Sanitary Sewer Project A.Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Report B.Resolution Receiving Feasibility Report and Calling Hearing on Improvement 12.Authorize Advertisement for Bids - Stubbs Bay Road Project 13.Request for Payment #7 - Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation 14.Reject Bid for Head Sanitary Sewer Project AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MAY 10,1999,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 15. Appointment of Planning Commission Vice Chair 16. Amend Program for Deferment of Special Assessments for Persons 65 Years of Age or Older Resolution 17. Part-Time Police Officer Jeffrey D. Johnson - PERA Resolution 1 8. Authorization to Hire Part-Time Police Clerk 18a. Hiring of Part-Time Community Service Officer CITY ATTORNE'V'’S REPORT ! i * 19. LICENSE: * 20. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS im 05/08 - Spring Cleanup Day-Construction Debris Only, 8:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. 05/10 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 05/11 - Special Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 05/17 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 05/20 - Lake Area Housing Workshop, Shorewood Senior Center, 7:30 a.m. 05/20 - Comprehensive Plan Informational Open House, Gray Freshwater Center, 7:00 p.m. 05/24 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 05/31 - HOLIDAY - Memorial Day Observance 06/02 - Highway 12 Design Review Committee Meeting, 5:30 p.m. 06/07 - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 06/14 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 06/21 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 06/28 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 7^ Public A ttendance Meeting D ate It 7 u□□□ C ouncil Planning C ommission Park C ommission Other V.-X - ■ U- k A Please fill out the information ^ REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CFTY RECORDS . •• • - • Xy.;. ■ . ■ V. Lvy V-. •••• NAME (pK^ print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 5.. 6.. 7. 8.. 9. 10.. 11. 12.. 13. 15. mtmA i • r it t r TO:Mayor and City Council I FROM: DATE: Ron Moorse, City Administrator May 7,1999 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 1 0 1999 t! SUBJECT: Planning Commission Candidate Interviews CITY OF U huw O The City received applications from four candidates to fill two positions on the City's Planning Commission. The candidates are Jay Nygard, Darnel KJuth, Jim Bull and Martin Woody. Copies of their applications are attached. Candidate interviews have been scheduled to begin at 6:45 p.m. on Monday, May 10. • < 4 .4. APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION t. . T> •» » . iL»/ APR 0 9 1999 GlTYof ORONO Municipal OfTIccs GiiY Or oHCfitrgjt Mdress. 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 553S6 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Commission Applying For: t □ Parks Commission pQ Planning Commissionng ror: lj rarKS v^ommission riannmg v«ommi------- ^ Community Task Force (Name) Name Address HA-l- 9^ Post Office & Zip Code Telephone (H) ^^(W) Resident of Orono m 7"5 years. xperience: 1Z. jjn/ifv iMllI IZ^f ^ tyifC^Ct^!tt.1 Cir/-} 1Z,f . Innh'-ij /yinUrurJ ■04 (^Je^ prenirfff / ^</r\-£(Sr- t i/s /i^AyJ Education: ' fi T 9 /^hnPApif f - dfjir^c M ^ __________ 1\ljiWr PMr QMo^I______________. ” ^ ^ - ^/'4r/' Lf\ko / Civic ahd Volunteer Activities (past.and pr;^sent): , . i / / j>;yf ^ Qi^lS rVTfuU^ / '■ ivic and Volunteer Activities (past and pre: LifU Ua^t f^igcly a/'Je mxhxut i- cltM'r hitxk /khvi^^ uSl ^(Z( ^ f1'4 Iklff^ l'o/v/>f«r T^^one (612) 47J-7357 * FAX 47M51# i Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. [Please be as specific as possible. Use additional sheet if necessary.) / ^ c iJAiAtff. OfrSo^chl^C h hfivL hi^Li 4^ n vCftW__^ Lpiat: ^ iv Dc&ao H'i (r\rc^ ^tuhfn What is^our vijw of the rde of the Cy^missio^ ^y*ii/ e>^ prone L>^ Lt^jct ^ feJunJf.^j- ier\/U^S. Other Comments: [Use this space to include any further information you wouid iike the City Councii to consider, or that you feei is reievant to the appointment you are seeking. You may aiso attach other materiais you wouid iike the Council to consider.) I understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting ••NOTE: Signature Voiunteer commission member's name, address and phone number will become pubiic information. 040US.2 Jay T. Nygard 1386 Rest Point Road Orono, Minnesota 65364 1/98 to 3/98 8/96 to 12/97 5/94 to 7/96 10/87 to 8/92 9/84 to 8/87 ^672; 472-2842 EXPERIENCE CGI, Inc., Reverse engineering through product destruction. 15161 Technology Drive Eden Prairie, MN (612) 937-2005 Design Mechanical Engineer • Hedesign scanner assembly for high speed digital camera. • Design and fabricate the following prototypes: illuminator, precision mounts for linear encoder, compact air knife, mounting and housing for assembly. • Vendor identification and selection. Honeywell, Inc., Sensor and Guidance Products DivisionHoneywell, me., bensor ana uuiaanc 2600 Ridgeway Parkway Minneapolis, MN (612) 951 -1000 Design/Production Mechanical Engineer • Redesign vibration isolation system for Inertial Measurement Unit including; design and documentation, testing and verification, design and implementation of production tooling, writing production processes, training production personnel. • Work in groups containing; Designers, Electrical Engineers. Software Engineers, Mechanical Engineers and assorted management jersonnel. • Design or improve production tooling and processes. • Perform Failure analysis of existing product. Datacard Corporation, Plastic card manipulation machines. Hopkins. Minnesota (612)931-1223 Mechanical Engineer (Intern) • Design and build machines for plastic card manipulation from concept through finished product • 'A'ork i!% groups containing; Designers. Drafters, Electrical Engineers, Software Engineers, Mechanical Engineers and assorted management personnel. • Analyze machine reliability and serviceability through Failure Mode and Effect /Vialysis. • Perform ‘destructive testing ’ of printhead to determine operational limits and failure modes. • Redesign machines to eliminate complications. Industrial Steel /T-N-T Machinino Steel Distributors/Manufacturers/Machine Shop. Columbia Heights, Minnesota (612) 781 -3292 Operate a blanchard grinder, mill, and forklift. Program and operate a Burgmaster. Various office duties induding competitive research.-prerviding estimates and accepting customer orders. United States Navy, U.S.S. Enterprise • Operations, repair and maintenance of a nudear powered steam room. Performance of casualty actions on a nuclear power plant. Nygard •page 2 EDUCATION University of Minnesota, Mechanical Enoineering, Spring 1991 to Summer 1996 Graduated with 3.1/4.0. Minneapoiis Community Coilege, Spring 1988 to Winter 1991 Navy Nuciear Power Training Unit, Idaho Falls, Idaho 6/85 to 11 /85 Prototype - Controlled experience working with nuclear reactors. Graduated in upper half of class. Navy Nuciear Power Schooi, Orlando, Florida, 10/84 to 5/85 Nuclear and Electrical Theory. Chemistry Applications, Ships Propulsion Applications. Graduated in upper half of class with a 3.28 grade point average. Navy Machinist Mate “A” School, Great Lakes, Illinois, 6/84 to 10/84 Diesel, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Hydraulics, Boiler Mechanics, Turbine Theory, Basic Plumbing Skills. Graduated with honors and a 93% average. Navy Fire Fighting School. Great Lakes, IL. 5/84 and Treasure Island, CA. 12/86. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT, INTERESTS AND ACTIVITIES Referee for Boys and Girls Basketball (3rd and 4th grades). Little League coach. Antique and classic boat enthusiast. Professional References Available Bv Request 1 APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION J IjbLJ4 *1. -•<«? -.••4 APR a 8 1999 CITY of ORONO CiTY v;r OnO.NJO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 0066 j-y Commission Applying For: G Parks Commission Jl^ Planning Commission □ Community Task Force (Name)__________________________ Name 1____ Address Fnx PostOffice &Zip Code L o n\oi / MAJ Telephone (H) Resident of Orono____^_______ iw) /a.i2.--2>lZ-C?a¥ years Work Experience: <p ^ A pf>r - S oS€ifi //M K) ^3^ /??3 — MercLci^'h 4 Pr^S^tn't ^ciluJgCi R/lQe> i.t/nclLcr*\ ( ^ ^ (jSoeSS^r 4Education: *~~' CJyViiA. o'f~ (aJ I W A -‘A^a^i&o*\ Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): ______I^lV^ <Z jAcsJ.i/tC/^r' l/isl Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 4734)510 . j-i r :*-^*^«-*^^*^>-»^**»--*»**^**g*- Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. {Please be as specific as possible. Use additional sheet if necessary.) 5s '"fflZclAerf What is your view of the role pf the Commission?of thf role o' Other Comments: {Use this space to include any further information you would like the City Council to consider, or that you fee! is relevant to the appointment you are seeking. You may also attach other materials you would like the Council to consider.) _______S>^c/l ______________________________—------------- I understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting, ••NOTE; Volunteer commission member's name, address and phone number will become public Information. 040ttt.2 Reasons for wanting to ser>'c on the Orono Planning Commission: Last year I spent time before both the Planning Commission rnd the City Council to get permission to put a small bathroom in our Game Building, which is a separate structure from our home. I workca with the city employees and some members of the Planning Commission to fashion a new ordinance which would allow plumbing in accessory structures imder certain circumstances. I also sat through many Planning Commission meetings and working sessions and obser\ ed their work on issues unrelated to my own. I gained quite a bit of knowledge on the work of the Planning Commission through those experiences. I believe the Planning Commission could use my legal and engineering experience in evaluating difficult and complex issues. I have had extensive training and experience in both engineering and the law wiiich I am willing to offer as a volunteer to the City of Orono. I am also a licensed Professional Engineer in the area of electrical engineering (Minnesota State Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying and Landscape Architecture, License No. 16531, 1984 - present). My view of the role of the Commission: The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Orono embodies the vision that the citizens of Orono see as the future of their city. The elected members of the City Council are charged with making decisions which are in concert with the overall goals of the Comprehensive Plan and to revise the Comprehensive Plan as the citizens may demand. The City Council enacts ordinances for ensuring compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and seeks input from the Planning Commission and the city planning engineers on the enactment of such ordinances. In this role, the Planning Commission acts as an advisor to the City Council. The Planning Commission also works with the city planning engineers to ensure that individual building projects follow' the ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan. Of course, the Comprehensive Plan can’t possibly be drafted in such a way as to predict every question which may arise. As such, the Planning Commission gives the citizens a forum to present their building plans to the Commission when their individual projects fail to pass muster under the Addendum to the application of Daniel J. Kluth to the City of Orono for the Planning Commission L V ^ >rr« fWI a Comprehensive Plan and the city ordinances. In that case, the citizens have a right to present their case for exceptions and variances. In the case of such requests, the Planning Commission hears the citizens’ cases and makes a recommendation to the City Council. That recommendation must be a careful and thoughtful review of each situation to save the City Council from the burden of rehearing every case. In this role, the Planning Commission members act as administrative judges making recommendations on individual cases. The Planning Commission must also work in an effective and well-informed manner with neighboring communities and other government agencies to assist the City Council and the Mayor in reviewing and implementing inter-community projects. Again, the requests and demands of other government authorities need careful and thoughtful review. The Planning Commission must also act as a source of creative ideas in the event that proposed actions of the other agencies do not meet with the approval of our City Council members. In this role, the Plaiming Commission acts as a diplomatic liaison to other governments entities. Other Comments: I believe I can contribute to the well-planned growth of our city as a member of the Orono City Planning Commission. 1 believe that attendance at the Planning Commission Meetings and working sessions should be a high priority for all members. My job is flexible enough to allow me to attend meetings at a variety of times and places. My experience with technology and the law provide me with unique skills which are needed on the Planning Commission. Addendum to the application of Daniel J. Kluth to the City of Orono for the Planning Commission APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION V.? ; i Pno5;viD APft I j 1999m . •*. -.‘i: GlTYof ORONO Municipal Offices Ci \ Y Ur CnOiVo street Address: Mailing Address: 2750 Kelley ParVway Orono, MN 55356 P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Commission Applying For: D Parks Commission ^ Planning Commission □ Community Task Force (Name)__________________________ Name -> oL H ^ T:^ ) Address 111 o >/><■./ fl AC e Post Office & Zip Code OU.K cl Telephone (H)(W) Resident of Orono years. Work Experience: 4<?.ve, lofpn /H ^Li. u'f'^r -C't K e Masi ~fA <> la-hcr Lal^ o-P 4-k,\ CA/eeA g p zi i Con^iJJ u) • fL ^gL>e/g| j/ezirs* C?i qt^i 1 t^xcl ^ ka\/e tJoA^eJ -Cat' /^o^s onJ ^ Education: /nus M i-u 6"f /111'a) Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): ^ i /> A 11 es</I ^A^^all-f-e^ '^Q.uCePSj J MAC l/f l/<sjp f^«Ve t//1/4fy T)f«^gg.4^>^ 4kJ Vtce. Pl^(><ilJ(2A'^j AU/cr/(?ti ~^H4. S CluL^, ^4)j I^A>\(\^e^Hen^ /?-55. s/t7MC e. l^a^ck er(- X>»**v«y Cofc* ^^)ka.4oa , y*f^lsy ilA^) /^tfo/'<4nAtt4oo Paih4-f^"TK»»i. MfJ ^ ^ ' Telephone «12) 473-7357 • FAX 4734)510 ^ ’ Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. [Please be as specific as possibie. Use additionai sheet if necessary.) l!k« 4-a 4-ha. flanAtHj ^o*nMiSSi/in flS g>>*\ / rn/t C.C r i,i Okl" ct-i^ . 9- ■1-0 kc\p Oct|^ Ca (3»*n plauPr -i~ka4 ^ koii> '^o ^/»a J!gC<g/a» CltiJ 5^^ jcl ^6*lP What Is your view of the role of the Commission? V1 tf..)e'f- i'ki' jl/a.iA ’^ ^f-o<A.p '^lial~ ayipL e s ■\rk^ (2a»i^'i'ruC^s Cglf f**. eu.t Icm^-Aan^i plan ~^o 'i'L.f h 0^ 0iaj^ »i«vht4*(/» ite. Pl/it*Mii\^ duiMIssiAn ^ r f C6 »mK tO<-v ^06^1/O « y/* <?uA ct'i'o ^ouiaC^I.f Other Comments: [Use this space to inciude any further information you wouidiike the City Councii to consider, or that you feei is reievant to the appointment you are seeking. You may aiso attach other materiais you wouidiike the Councii to consider.) ^ n.^ -l-L S i;eUA4ggr ^g>y.|/oM __Mj& (Zs r MOO «iuc ~kit »V\g.9-I »^y . CiiA.d /4rcs^ 'f'o I r' a M u tA. I <t-f I I V.J 0 M. t I I II a h k u ‘^k m c J;n 1/; hf ^i*Of % (/CK It"’ tOg/glO«n^ 'tk et ^ L on e cg(//- I understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting V /20 •NOTE: ^^fgnature Voiunteer commission member's name, address and phone number will become public Information. 040896.2 •• • APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION 'i'Jt.-.V T. \V y •> GITYof ORONO p""—*.Z-. j l:7) •-'!C Municipal Ofllccs U 7 1999 \\ ‘street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Malting Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 Commission Applying For: □ Parks Commission '^J’lanning Commission □ Community Task Force (Name)__________________________ Name Address Post Office & Zip Code [JOPH IA tA, M)v( Telephone (H)n (W)4-S-o4^^' Resident of Orono years. Work Experience: ’R2es>iDg>JT -f- , ivVMTiKj WqcQ^' AA-Ai't^CTS, IKA. , (M/J ■__________________ Education: , {\AOhJi7>rtJA rWTUA . \\'M )/vmLtie dP Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. {Please be as specific as possible. Use additional sheet if necessaty.) _ rjoKr\%\h^ U 1MIA^ 4' mPo9X^iJ[' 'V) -Tvh^. O'ri o(Lcn ^ M What is your view of the role of the Commission? va ^ 4 -p) n \Pk-T5 n/v) ^AtI IWD/0 iptAr U ^EaA^6<? iAs^-TT) r^A.<ML-tv)iW V lA^i^ . Other Comments: {Use this space to include any further information you would like the City Council to consider, or that you feet is relevant to the appointment you are seeking. You may also attach other materials you would tike the Council to c^sider.) , T 1-l-A'V.^i^ ft^} K)01 \ /PT^ f/vl A VA-^r^£y fx O0.AAA.A.Pr'?/:i/Vw hrs, As ia^LL A-S (-AJD 4>-?No iPiM-feKT' TAsr fS AtJl^ AomtC-i AiJ TAjVJfv!!^)A- 1 understand this appointment mey he discussed at a public meeting 4--Vh-<X\ Signatvire Data **NOTE: Volunteer commission member's name, address and phone number will become public information. 040896.2 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26.1999 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 1 0 1999 CITY UH UMUJ^O ROLL The Council met on the above mentioned date \Mith the following members present; Mayor Gabriel Jabbour. Council Members Charles Kelley, Richard Flint, Bob Sansevere, and Barbara Peterson. Representing staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Pubic Works Director Greg Gappa, and Recorder Jackie Young. Representing the Parks Commission were Chair Andrew McDermott, Irene Silber and Susan Wilson Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 1. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION TO PARK VOLUNTEERS Andrew McDermott, Parks Commission, thanked the volunteers who attended the Park Volunteer Recognition Reception for their fine efforts at helping to maintain the Orono Park System. McDermott stated the Orono City Council is committed to improving the local parks and that the Navarre Park is the next park on the Parks Commission's list for improvements. Mayor Jabbour presented certificates of appreciation to the following park volunteers for their outstanding efforts in helping to maintain the Orono Park System; Bruce and Lisa Skjerping and Family. Richard and Amelia Kroeger, Larry Elsen, Eleanor Fairbanks accepted on behalf of Jim Mulvanny. James and Nancy Mittlestaedt, and Gale R. Landberg. 2. Presentation of Golf Course Painting to City Artist Jon Wright presented the City of Orono with a painting of the 5th hole at the Orono Golf Course in recognition of the 75th anniversary of the golf course. Wright stated that prints are available at the Golf Course for $25.00 each for anyone interested in purchasing one. Mayor Jabbour thanked Mr. Wright for his fine contribution to the City. (#3) CONSENT AGENDA Items 6, 7,8, 9.10,12,13,15, and 19 were added to the Consent Agenda. Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *(#4) REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 12,1999 Page 1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26.1999 (#4, Minutes of April 12,1999, continued) Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of April 12,1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#5) TOWNLINE ROAD INFORMATIONAL MEETING OF APRIL 12,1999 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Townline Road Informational meeting of April 12,1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS McDermott stated that he has met with the City's park planning consultant at Navarre Park and the consultant will be submitting preliminary proposals for redesigning/upgrading the park and the parking lot located across the street. McDermott commented that he and Mr. Meyers have attended a meeting for the Dakota Rail to Trail and would like to schedule a meeting with Council Member Flint and Mayor Jabbour to discuss this issue. Mayor Jabbour commented he would be in favor of a joint meeting to discuss the direction the City would like this committee to take on this project. Jabbour noted that the City would like to acquire more land in Navarre to add to the existing park system in that community. Mayor Jabbour stated that the Fairview Covenant Church has delayed a decision on the access to Saga Hill until after the Easter Holiday, but that the City hopes to have a final decision from the church on this issue by the end of the month. McDermott stated the Parks Commission will be looking at the access and what they would like to see happen with the access and the park. Kelley inquired what steps have been taken regarding the Seven Nations Natural Area Park. McDermott stated that cleanup of the site has been started, the buckthorn has been removed, and Bonestroo has commenced work on a preliminary design of the parking lot. The Parks Commission would like to have the trails laid out and mowed this year, with a limited amount of landscaping being planted this year. McDermott reminded the City Council members of the March for Parks event scheduled for this Sunday, May 2,1999, from 12:00 to 3:00 p.m., and encouraged the members of the City Council and general public to attend this fine event. Kelley inquired what plans the Parks Commission had regarding the bike trail along Old Crystal Bay Road. McDermott stated they would like to see the trail straightened out in front of the Thompson property. Gappa noted that the City is asking for a ten foot trail easement. Kelley recommended that the urban curb be taken out if the trail is relocated. Page 2 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26,1999 (Park Commission Comments, continued) Flint commented that he attended the Parks Commission when this item was discussed and it was his understanding that the Parks Commission is asking for the easement at this time but that work on the bike traii will not be commencing for a period of time. McDermott stated that they would like to have the trail paved at the time the roads for the subdivision are put in. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Lili McMillan, Representative, stated that the LMCD would like to utilize Mike Gaffron’s services to help conduct a seminar among the 14 cities involved in the LMCD to help formulate a clear plan on how to handle developments and outlets around Lake Minnetonka. McMillan noted that the workshop is scheduled for Wednesday, May 5, at 8:00 a.m., and encouraged at least one City Council member to attend this workshop as well as the City Administrator. Kelley inquired what the LMCD would do if a parcel does not have dock rights on an island. McMillan stated she does not know the answer to that question at this time. Mayor Jabbour remarked that he has received calls from residents who have expressed frustration with the process that is required by the LMCD, noting that he would be interested to see what the other cities would do if that land is developed. McMillan stated that there has been a change in the philosophy surrounding Lake Minnetonka and people are becoming more environmentally conscious. Kelley inquired when the last time was that the LMCD reviewed their comprehensive plan. McMillan stated that the LMCD code was reviewed in 1991. Mayor Jabbour stated that the Management Plan should be a guide to the LMCD, and that there is a need in this area for boats and drivers to be licensed and insured. Jabbour expressed a concern that the LMCD was not following the Management Plan that has been established. McMillan stated she is chairman of Save the Lake and one of her goals is to set up boating classes for young teens, and that the LMCD could be approached about supporting that project. Kelley stated he was In favor of Gaffron attending this workshop. Gaffron commented that he is planning to attend the workshop. McMillan stated that she is in the early stages of looking at the budget for the LMCD. noting that the monies in the Eurasian Milfoil fund are derived from private donations. Mayor Jabbour noted that the amount spent on Eurasian Milfoil comes in below what is budgeted every year and that perhaps the LMCD should look at reducing that amount. McMillan stated that the LMCD is just starting the budget process, with the auditor giving a presentation on Wednesday. McMillan remarked that she has been informed that there needs to be 12 months of operating expenses in the budget for Eurasian Milfoil. Page 3 11 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26.1999 (Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, continued) Kelley suggested that the LMCD look at reducing their surplus and at the same time review how they can lower their expenses. McMillan thanked Ron Moorse, City Administrator, for inciuding an articie in the City newsletter regarding proper lawn care and spring cleanup for land located around Lake Minnetonka. McMillan noted that phosphorus-free fertilizers are available for lawns. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Dale Lindquist, Planning Commission Representative, had no comment. PUBLIC COMMENTS None ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT M#6) #2444 BRIAN AND SUSAN SCHEBLER, 1354 REST POINT CIRCLE - VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. 4272 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2444, Brian and Susan Schebler, 1364 Rest Point Circle, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4272, a Resolution Granting After-the-Fact Variances to Permit a Detached, Ground Level Deck Located on the Lakeside of the Residence. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#7) #2457 PAULA AND DAVID LINDBERG, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD - VARIANCES/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT • RESOLUTION NO. 4273 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2457, Paula and David LIndberg, 1392 Baldur Park Road, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4273, a Resolution Granting Variances to Hardcover and Structural Coverage to Allow Construction of a New Residence. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. *(#8) #2468 BRUCE AND BETSY NUSBAUM, 3480 NORTH SHORE DRIVE > VARIANCES • RESOLUTION NO. 4274 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2468, Bruce and Betsy Nusbaum, 3480 North Shore Drive, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4274, a Resolution Granting Variances to Hardcover and Structural Coverage to Allow Construction of a New Residence. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#9) #2472 SANDRA S. LARSON. 540 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD • VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4275 Page 4 1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26.1999 {U9 Sandra Larson, continued) Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2472, Sandra Larson, 640 Orono Orchard Road, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4275, a Resolution Granting Variances to Setbacks to Allow the Construction of a Covered Porch and an Enclosed Deck. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. •(#10) #2473 MATTHEW B. HERMAN, 3825 CHERRY AVENUE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4276 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2473, Matthew Herman, 3825 Cherry Avenue, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4276, a Resolution Granting Variances to Allow the Construction of a Catwalk Structure Across an Undeveloped City Right-of-Way and a Wetland. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#11) #2475 RONALD P. ZELINSKY, JR., 320 TURNHAM ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4277 Ronald Zelinsky, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to construct an 18 ’ by 36' swimming pool and a 12’ by 16’ pool house at 320 Tumham Road, which is zoned RR-1A and has a five acre minimum. This lot originally consisted of two lots which were legally combined and consists of 2.8 acres. Weinberger remarked that the Applicant was recently informed that he would not be able to have a pool house with plumbing installed since City Code requires that all accessory structures with plumbing be located in such a manner as to meet all yard setbacks. City Staff is recommending that the portion of the application dealing with the pool house be denied at this time. Weinberger noted that there is a garage located on the property with living quarters above it. This structure does contain plumbing and was used for a home occupation by a previous owner. The Applicant is proposing to place a swimming pool on the Chippewa Lane side of the property, which will require setback variances to the front lot line and side yard adjacent to street lot line. The Planning Commission did review the portion of the application dealing with the poot house, and recommended denial of the variances for an accessory building since the proposed pool house did not meet the required setbacks as City Code mandates. The Applicant did indicate that he would not construct the pool house without the plumbing. The Applicant is also proposing to construct a berm with landscaping in an effort to screen the pool from the neighbor to the south and to act as a buffer in an effort to reduce the noise level. Weinberger stated the affected neighborhing property owner has indicated that she would be in favor of this application with the understanding that a six foot berm will be constructed and adequate landscaping be planted to screen the pool. The Planning Commission did recommend approval of the portion of the application dealing with construction of the pool subject to the Applicant constructing a six foot high berm, planting adequate landscaping, submittal of a survey showing the existing and proposed topography of the property, and the Applicant obtaining a land alteration permit. Weinberger noted the Applicant will need to Page 5 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26.1999 (#11 #2475 Ronald Zelinsky, continued) apply for a conditional use permit if the project requires more than 600 cubic yards of fill to be moved. City Staff is recommending denial of the pool house and approval of the swimming pool. Zelinsky commented that he was initially told that he would be able to have the pool house with plumbing and was later informed that it would not be allowed. Zelinsky indicated that he would not be constructing the pool house at this time. There were no public comments. Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Application #2475, Ronald P. Zelinsky, Jr., 320 Turnham Road, and approve RESOLUTION NO. 4277, a Resolution Granting Variances to Sideyard Setback and Front Lot Line Setback to Allow the Construction of a Swimming Pool. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#12) JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE - VICTORIA ESTATES - RESOLUTION NO. 4278 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4278, a Resolution Directing Staff to Issue a Joint Use Dock License to Victoria Estates Homeowners Association Subject to Conditions Noted Herein for the Period of January 1, 1999 to December 31,1999 and Retroactively for the Period of January 1,1997 to December 31,1998. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#13) KELLY COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION - JOINT USE DOCK APPROVAL - RESOLUTION NOS. 4279 AND 4280 Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4279, a Resolution Approving Creation of a Joint Use Docking Area Adjacent to Outlot A, Kelly Cove to Serve the Kelly Cove Homeowners Association. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4280, a Resolution Directing Staff to Issue a Joint Use Dock License to Kelly Cove Homeowners Association, subject to the conditions noted therein for the period of April 16,1999, to December 31,1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#14) ABOVE-GROUND STORAGE TANKS - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 186, 2ND SERIES Gaffron stated at the April 12 meeting the City Council members had indicated general support for the use of above-ground fuel storage tanks in the B-2 Lakeshore Business District, and an ordinance amending that section of the code is before the City Council tonight for your review. Approval of this ordinance requires only a 3/5 majority vote, as it is not a zoning ordinance. City Staff has not had an opportunity to explore the ramiHcations this ordinance would have on the City's marinas, but it is likely that it will result in some requests for variances to hardcover as well as property line and lakeshore setback. Page 6 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26,1999 (#14 Above Ground Storage Tanks, continued) City Staff would like the Fire Marshall to review the City’s current ordinances to determine whether it may be appropriate to make further revisions to this section of the code. The Minnesota Uniform Fire Code does provide strict regulations concerning the location, design, and use of fuel dispensing systems. Gaffron indicated he was not familiar enough vrith the Fire Code to address these issues. Gaffron stated at this time Staff is aware of two potential marinas who may pursue an application to install above-ground fuel tanks in the B-2 District. Kelley indicated that he is aware that Bill Stubbs has had above-ground tanks on his property for a number of years, and inquired whether those would be considered legal or illegal. Gaffron remarked that they are allowed in the RR-1B District. Gaffron commented that he is not aware whether those tanks meet the current codes. Kelley inquired what the B-2 District consists of. Gaffron stated the B-2 District only includes the marinas. Kelley suggested that City Staff become informed about what the marinas are currently doing as far as fuel tanks. Gaffron stated it is his understanding Sailor's World and North Shore are the only two marinas pumping gas at this time. Kelley inquired if the size of the tanks would be limited by this ordinance. Gaffron stated that typically tanks are either 2.000.4.000. or 6,000 gallon tanks. Kelley indicated that he would like to view the marinas to see what system they are presently using as well as to get an idea of the size of the tanks. Kelley inquired whether there were any safety issues that also needed to be addressed with the above-ground fuel tanks. Mayor Jabbour stated in his opinion above ground tanks are environmentally safer. Gaffron commented that the Fire Code does have very strict regulations concerning the fuel tanks. Kelley indicated that he would be in favor of looking at this ordinance further, noting that he would prefer to see the tanks removed from the ground since other properties have experienced soil contamination due to corrosion of the underground fuel storage tanks. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the marina trucking gas has been informed that It is illegal to do so. Gaffron commented that he would like the Fire Marshall to approach the marina to address these concerns due to his unfamilarity with the Fire Code. Kelley suggested that the Fire Marshall review this ordinance as well. Sansevere stated he would be in favor of this ordinance but would like to see adequate protection for the tanks. Mayor Jabbour noted that the tanks vrill take up room and some parking space or other green space will be lost. Page 7 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26, 1999 (#14 Above Ground Storage Tanks, continued) There were no public comments. Mayor Jabbour noted that the Golf Course does have above-ground tanks as well. Kelley moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 186, Second Series Amending Orono Municipal Code Section 9.34 by Allowing Aboveground Fuel Storage Tanks In the B-2 Zoning District. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Kelley stated that one major issue that the City Council should address in the near future is the need for a new fire station and the costs associated with it. Kelley commented that during the crappie fishing contest held recently he noticed two policemen issuing tickets for expired trailer licenses, noting that most of the trailers were parked legally during the event. ENGINEER REPORT *(#15) RENEWAL OF SAFE-ASSURE CONTRACT Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the proposal from Safe Assure Consultants for Conducting Safety Training and Preparation of the Related Written Programs and Documentation at an Annual Cost of $2,826.00. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (#16) LONG LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURES Moorse remarked that, at the Long Lake Fire Commission meeting, a 15 year capital equipment replacement plan was introduced along with a request for 1999 capital expenditures. Moorse stated that the Long Lake Fire Department is requesting the purchase and installation of foam systems on the two main fire engines and the repainting of one engine. Moorse indicated that the totai cost for these 1999 capital expenditures requests is $38,000, with Omno's share being $26,600. Moorse noted that Long Lake, Orono, and Medina will be sharing in this expenditure. Moorse indicated that a new fire station will need to be constructed due to the Highway 12 Improvements, and that he is unaware at this time what portion of the costs for the fire station will be reimbursed by MnDot. Kelley noted that Orono is assuming 70 percent of the costs for this expenditure. Kelley commented it was his impression the Fire Department has already determined the new site for the fire station, noting that the Orono City Council has not had any input at this time into where the fire station should be located. Page 8 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26.1999 (#16 Long Lake Fire Department, continued) Kelley stated that he has recently toured the local fire departments in the area, and suggested that Orono get together with the neighboring communities to see if a joint agreement could be reached to mutually share some of the fire equipment. Kelley commented in his opinion the submitted list does only contain items that are necessary, noting that one of the top pnorities of the City is adequate public protection. Peterson commented that the life of the equipment also needs to be taken Into consideration. Kelley suggested that a joint meeiing between Long Lake, the Fire Department, and Orono to discuss the new Fire station should be scheduled. Moorse stated that a site review and building design need to be completed for the fire station. Kelley noted that the City only has two years in which to complete construction of the new fire department and that action on this issue needs to be taken soon. Moorse noted that the Highway 12 upgrade project is scheduled to begin in the year 2002. Mayor Jabbour remarked that the City of Orono is grateful to the Fire Department for their contributions to the City. Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the Long Lake Fire Department Capital Outlay request for 1999, of which the City of Orono's share is $26,600, and to authorize a budget adjustment to reflect the $26,600 expenditure from the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#17) LAKE AREA HOUSING WORKSHOP Moorse Indicated that a housing study has been conducted of Orono and the other communities. Moorse stated that a Housing Workshop is scheduled for Thursday, May 20, to discuss the housing study, and the goals and directions that the various cities would like to take regarding future housing needs in this area. Moorse stated that they would like as many members as possible from the City Council and Planning Commission as possible to attend this Housing Workshop. Flint noted that he will not be able to attend this workshop. (#18) APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR Mayor Jabbour inquired of Dale Lindquist whether he would be interested in serving as vice chair of the Planning Commission. Lindquist stated he has already served in that position previously, and suggested that William Stoddard be considered for the position. Mayor Jabbour remarked that Sandra Smith would also make a good candidate, and that perhaps Page 9 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26,1999 (#18 Appointment of Planning Commission, continued) a good policy to follow would be to have the former chair serve as the vice chair the following year. The City Council directed City Staff to contact Sandra Smith to see if she would be willing to accept the position as Vice Chair of the Planning Commission. (#19) OTHER ISSUES Moorse indicated he was approached by City Council Member Kelley and was asked whether the City of Orono was prepared for a situation similar to what happened out in Colorado. Moorse indicated the City and Police Department, as well as the surrounding communities, do have policies and procedures in place for dealing with those types of situations. Moorse stated that there are also procedures in place to be followed at the school In the event of such an emergency. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT None *(#20) LICENSES Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the following licenses. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Pro Events International, Inc. 1999 Tour DeLake Minnetonka Bike Tour Around Lake Minnetonka May 23,1999, 8:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Gear West Run Bike Run Duathlon Starting at Orono Middle School May 23,1999, 6:00 a.m. to Noon *(#21) BILLS Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0 ADJOURNMENT Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 8:38 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 10 ■ i ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26.1999 ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 11 Date of Application: 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60-day limit: 4/17/99 120-day subdivision limit: 6/17/99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING MAY 1 0 1999 CITY OF UHUISIO Date: May 7,1999 Item No.: Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. GafTron Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2466 James Renckens and John Winston, 3020 Watertown Road - Preliminary Plat Aphcation - Request for Reconsideration of Council Action of April 12 List of Exhibits A - Council Minutes 4-12-99 B - Letters submitted by Applicants On April 12 Council voted 2-1 to approve this preliminary plat application subject to requiring platting of the 50’ road outlet along Ae north boundary of the property, but granting a variance to the 'back lot' ordinance standards by allowing the creation of a flag lot (i.e. Council chose to not require the 30' driveway corridor to Watertown to be platted as an outlet, which then allows applicants area credit for that corridor). Staff was implicitly directed to draft a preliminary plat resolution for adoption. Applicants have since submitted a number of letters outlining their position regarding the northerly Road Outlet requirement, and are requesting that Council move to reconsider the action of April 12. One of the two Council members who voted in the majority (Kelley, Flint) may move to re-open. Staff met with the applicants on May 6 and concluded tiiat there are issues presented which deserve additional staff research and consideration. Staff recommends that the applicants be allowed to briefly state their reasons for the reconsideration, that the issue be re-opened, and that further action be tabled for two weeks to allow for 1) staff review and 2) renotification of interested parties that this will be reconsidered on May 24. Failure to re-open will result in staff drafting a Preliminary Plat Approval Resolution per the April 12 action for your May 24 meeting, in order to maintain the integrity of the 120-day subdivision review process. #2466 - Renckens &Winston - Prelim. Plat May?, 1999 Page 2 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to reconsider application #2466, and table to May 24. Mayor Jabbour unseated himself for this item. John Winston said his property abuts the northeastern part of the parcel. He and driveway corridor at the southwesterly comer of the parcel. He would like “> F«erv« the character of this property that blends with the neighborhoods to the east and the w«t-He there is property to the north that could possibly be developed. He does not feel that Mr. Renckens should have to provide access to that property by creating Outlot B. Sansevere asked staff why the outlets were made a contingency of approval. Page 9 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 12,1999 (U9) #2466 James Renckens, having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road ~ Continued reason for platting the 50* wide outlot to the north would be for a future access point for the lots to the north and for this property if it were to be divided since the lot area does exist. Sansevere asked why the outlot should be across Mr. Renckens’ property instead of the property above it. Weinberger stated that at the time the Crystal Creek subdivision was approved the outlot was platted from one side to the other. Part of the reason the outlot exists is there were some septic sites and some other issues with lot area and topography of the lots to the north. Lot 7 does not have access. There is a temporary driveway easement across Lot 6 from the temporary cul-de-sac on Crystal Creek to serve Lot 7. That was written in until the time a road is developed to gain access to Lot 7. At that time the driveway easement would be eliminated. Future planning is why the City staff and the Planning Commission have recommended the platting of an outlot. Sansevere asked if the outlot requirement was brou^t to Mr. Renckens* attention by the previous owner. Renckens said he has not talked with Mrs. Stubbs. He said he was aware of the interest the City had in the outlot, but it did not appear in his due diligence to be a serious interest because the outlot didn’t seem to serve any particular benefit. He said there is access to Lot 7 and there is a potential for Mr. Carlson to acquire property to the east to gain access to his property. He said there is opposition to the outlot from the Rolling Meadows subdivision as well as the Crystal Creek subdivision. Winston explained the reduction from three lots to two lots should eliminate the need for the outlot. Renckens said 22,000 square feet of trees would have to be removed to pul in a cul-de-sac or roadway across the northern portion of the property. Alan Carlson gave historical information regarding the long-range plan for the 50’ outlot. The long-range plan was to extend Crystal Creek Road to Wear Lane to fonn a loop and provide access to the north. He owns 30 acres to the north that would be accessed by the outlot. He reviewed previous City actions that refer to the 50’ outlot. He wants the 50’ outlot for access to his 30 acres. Flint asked how Mr. Renckens plans to gain access to the back of the lot. Renckens said he has access from Watertown Road via a 30’ strip that runs on the west side of the property. He has approached the Crystal Creek developers about gaining access from the private road, but he has not reached an agreement with them. Page 10 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 12,1999 (U9) §2466 James Renckens, having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road - Continued Flint asked how the developers could prevent him from gaining access from the road since it abuts his property. Renckens said they oah prevent it because it’s a private road. Flint asked how the City would accomplish the long-range plan if it’s a private road, Renckens said the City would have to acquire the road from the Crystal Creek Development, pay for the cost of installing the road across the northern part of his property and would have to acquire additional land if the road were to continue to the east and pay for the cost o ^ constructing that additional road until it connects with a public road. Renckens said previous applications for subdivision of this parcel had different intent for the prope^ than he does His intended use of the property is to build a home on the northern part of the property so it is secluded. Kelley said he was involved in the Crystal Creek subdivision and there is City Council and the Planning Commission always viewed that Crystal Creek Road and Wear T would connect. He said another issue involved is the property to the east and north thatLane would connect will someday be developed. Sansevere also questioned how the City would connect with a private road, Barrett said it is a private road. When the road was developed, the City took a public easement so that if the developers refuse access, the City can open the road for the public. Flint asked if the City could assure Mr. Renckers access to the back of his property through Crystal Creek. Barrett said that by declaring the public easement open, the City could grant access to the public over that road to the northern end of the property. Flint said that Crystal Creek is the logical access to the back of the property and he is not convinced that Mr. Renckens should have to provide the access to the east and north. Barrett said that vdth this applicaUon, the City has a strong right to the outlot. Flint said that there are a number of people with common interests and if they could work something out, perhaps the City wouldn’t have to take the 50 outlot. Carlson said he does not own Lots 6 and 7. Page 11 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 12,1999 (#9) #2466 James Renckens, having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road • Continued away from him so he could develop the lots, he gained economic benefit from that and now he wants additional benefit from the 50’ outlot. He said that the subdivision for Crystal Creek states that the subdivider is responsible for providing legal access to the property to the north. Renckens said he does not want to lose the septic sites in the northeast comer of the property that are within the 50’ outlot area because he would not be able to put his home in the northern part of the property. Kelley said that the City ’s long-term vision at the time of the Crystal Creek subdivision was to link Crystal Creek Road with Wear lane. Sansevere asked if the expectation was to make the link across Mr. Renckens ’ property or go into the property above it. Kelley said the intention was to take it from what is the Stubbs property. Flint said that the City has also been supportive of people that want to keep cul-de-sacs. Kelley said that is true, but the roads are usually platted to go all the way through new subdivisions. Flint said the City has the legal right to put the roads in, but the City hasn’t because the homeowners on both sides prefer the cul-de-sacs. Kelley said that is true, but the easements are there so that if the City gets pressure from the neighbors, the roads can be made public. He said that it is good public policy to take the 50’ outlot. Sansevere asked if Mr. Renckens was aware of the 50’ outlot when he looked into acquiring the property and if he was hoping the City would override it Renckens said he was aware of the issue with the 50’ outlot, but he didn’t think it applied in his situation. Winston said that when they reduced the subdivision from three lots to two lots, it would be a reasonable basis to eliminate the 50’ outlot. He distributed information regarding cul-de-sacs in the immediate neighborhood of the property that are not connected. Kelley reviewed the list and stated the reasons why the cul-de-sacs are not connected. Winston said the point is that there are a number of cul-de-sacs in the area that are not connected. He said cul-de-sacs are part of the character of the neighborhood and they are trying to preserve that character. Page 12 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 12,1999 (U9) #2466 JamesRenckens, having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road- Continued Renckens said this parcel has a lot of appeal. He is concerned about the future development of the area if the outlot is made into a road. He does not want to be in a busy area. Sansevere asked about the septic alternatives if the 50’ outlot is created. Renckens said the septic site is in the northeast comer of the site. He said the alternative is to remove the trees in the middle of the site. The only other septic site is near the wetland. The wetland has to be extended with a ponding area which will eliminate that septic site. Kelley asked staff how access would be gained to Watertown Road if the property was subdivided further. Weinberger stated that only two residences are allowed on a shared private driveway. Access for the northerly lot would have to be via the cul-de-sac on Crystal Creek Road. Mike Hilbelink stated that none of the property owners in the area are in favor of the 50’ outlot except for Mr. Carlson. He said the City didn’t take the outlot at the time of the Crystal Creek Subdivision and it appears to him that the reason was to preserve septic sites and two lots for Mr. Carlson. Mr. Hilbelink feels Mr. Carlson will benefit from the outlot and the burden is being put on the person developing this parcel. He said if this parcel had already been developed at the time of the Crystal Creek Subdivision, the outlot would have had to go to tlie north and Mr. Carlson would have lost two lots. Carlson stated that the road was put where City staff wanted it put. He was promised a 50’ outlot across the top of the Stubbs property and he wants it. Flint asked about Mr. Carlson creating his own problem when he sold off Lots 6 and 7 since that is what isolated his northern property. Carlson said Lots 6 and 7 were part of the entire plat and there weren’t any problems with septic sites. He again stated tliat he put the road where the City wanted it and he does not want to be denied access to his 30 acres. Hilbelink said this parcel could be sold and not subdivided. If that happened, the outlot could not be crta-.t J. Kelley asked if ' sffron was involved in the Crystal Creek subdivision. Gaffron said he had some involvement in the subdivision. Kelley asked what the staffs position was from a long-term planning point of view. Page 13 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING minutes for APRIL 12,1999 (§9) U2466 James Renckens, having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road - Continued Gaffron said he concurred with Kelley that the long-term view was for an outlot across the northern part of the Stubbs property to connect with Wear Lane. Flint asked how Carlson would gain access to his 30 acres if this 50 ’ outlot is not available. Gaffron said Carlson would have to provide access. The clear intent of the City back i: 991 was to continue a 50 ’ corridor across the top the Stubbs property. Steve Koehler, 35 Crystal Creek Road, said the Crystal Creek Homeowners Association objects to extending Crystal Creek Road because of increased traffic. He said there are drainage concerns as to how the water will drain into the Association’s property. He favors the flag lot concept. Sansevere asked if 50 ’ is the minimum that can be taken. Gaffron said 50 ’ is the standard for a road serving this number of homes. Sansevere asked if today was the first Renckens heard that if the subdivision was two lots instead of three, the City would still take the 50 ’ outlot. Renckens said yes, that he had heard City staff didn’t like the length of Crystal Creek Road, that they liked the fact he was proposing to buy the property and not put in a road. He also understood that the 30 ’ outlot was only taken in the case of lakeshore pr perty. Flint asked if staff s position is that the City should have both the 50 ’ and the 30 ’ outlots. Gaffron said the 30 ’ outlot is driven by the idea that there is going to be access through or adjacent to a front lot and a back lot is being created by having the access there. City code does not allow the creation of a flag lot which is by definition a lot that is continuous all the way down through that narrow corridor. The code states that a flag lot caruiot be created, you have to create a back lot with an outlot corridor. Flint asked if the 30 ’ outlot is necessar)' if access to the back lot is through Crystal Creek. Gaffron said if the access is to the rear, the 30 ’ outlot would not be necessary. He said that in every subdivision where there is potential to connect to adjacent properties, the City would have them continue the road through their property to the next one. Kelley said that if the applicant has access from Crystal Creek, he can eliminate the 30 ’ outlot, move the lot line further south and make Lot 1 bigger so it could be subdivided in the future. . Renckens said he could not subdivide Lot 1 to meet the subdivision code. Page 14 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING minutes for APRIL 12,1999 (#9) 92466 James Reackens, haviag an Merest in 3020 Watertown Road- Continued KeUey said Renckens would not be subject to the back lot requirements if the City allows him access off Crystal Creek Road. Renckens said he would not want to have his house in the no^em part of the property and. have a driveway come through that accesses the center part of the property. Kelley suggested the applicant be allowed access from Ciystal Creek Road so the outlot on Lot 2 would not be required. Kelley asked for the Council’s opinion on the 50 ’ outlot. Sansevere said he is in favor of Mr. Renckens’ proposal. Flint said he is inclined to approve the Planning Commission's recommendation for the 50' outlot. Kelley said he concurs with Flint. He asked if the applicant still wants the access to I^t 1 to te from Watertown Road if the Council approves the 50' outlot across the northern part of the property. Winston said he believes they have to have the access to Watertown Road because they can't foist themselves on the Crystal Creek Homeowners Association. Kelley said the City Attorney could give an opinion to the Association as to what he believes the City’s position would be. Winston said he does not believe the City wants to make Crystal Creek Road a public street. Barrett said the City may not want to. but it is an option that would be available. Renckens said he can't build a home on Lot 1 if the 50' outlot is created. Winston asked about the number of votes necessary for action on this item. Barrett said It requires a majority vote. Kelley asked for the CouncU members' opinion on the 30' outlot. Sansevere said he can approve the 30 outlot. Flint said he would be willing to grant a variance to the requirement for the 30' outlot. Page 15 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 12,1999 / (#9) §2466 James Renckens, having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road - Continued Flint asked for Barrett’s opinion on amending the outlet requirements and grant a variance for a flag lot. Barrett said the Council can amend the resolution, create a flag lot and grant a Variance. He said the variance would require two votes out of three. Flint moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve Application §2466,3020 Watertown Road, without the 30’ outlot on the southwest comer and granting a variance to allow access to Lot 1 without the 30’ outlot. VOTE; Ayes 2, Nays 1. Sansevere opposed. Jabbour abstained. (#ip)^4623ohfand^evelo; nen^avifi^nlnterest in U)25'Bro^ Road South - 6 Lo^^^limhaary SuJWivision - Resolutions 42^/hnd 4268 ^ .......... 'Steve Bohl, applwant; was present. . Weinberg^r^sentedlfi?S5^enort. He said the applican^l^roposing to.su^ide the propertylocated aLHi25 South pfown Road into six residential lots. Five'of the lots would be served by d'cul^sac and oneTlot would ^^served off from Brown Road. The applicant is requesting piiuminary plat-^proval^d"aConditional l^Permit to allow grading within five feet'df a lot line for a'Srivcwa/for Lot 1. The neij^bors have agreed to the shared z drivetvay for Lot 1. Wfemberger said this is a 45-awd^site located in the two-acre nual residential zoning d>^cf.''Approximately 50V^the site is wetlahd. One backjot would be ’created with accessby an outlot. Lots 2 throp^ 6 would haVe access throu^ Carnage Lane. A NURP pond^^lfbe constructed less Aan 20’ from'a lot line. Staff does not object to this- ^ since the adj,a6mt properties are servejmt^anit^>ewer. Suitable gc^ic sites have been found on ali six lots. The City Engip^r has reviewed the grading^d drainage plans and they are acceptarfe. Staff recommen^ipHhe City'place drainsr.e a^onservationwsements over the^^d and the wetlands, rl^aid the ap . • ias,fa.,;veJto the easemehts. Steve ^hl said he KaTsj^mitted an application tp^tfie Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for ^ir revi^.'ile asl^ it he would be^ablp-tdinclude the 501-oci00’ tax-forfeited parcel next to South Brown^oad. He has a buj^or-^hat parcel. ' J^boui^ked staff if a vacation he£h^ wouldpe necessary. LB^ett said the/arcel would have to be give/back to Hennepin County, o^effed to other ^ public entitics^nd then Mr. Bohl could purchase the^property. ^ ^ Kelley sai^e would be in favor of the ^licwt obtaining the tax-fo^ited property.^/ Scott W^ton stated he is the possibleJhil^r of the tax-forfeited pr^prty. He ask^about the process'^ obtaining the tax-forfeited parcel. Page 16 :« • • James R. R enckens 4680 Forestview Lane Plymouth, Minnesota 55442 (612)559-2380 Elizabeth Van Zomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator Orono City Hall 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Re: James R. Renckens Class ni Preliminary Plat Subdivision Zoning File No. 2466 April 2,1999 Dear Ms. Van Zomeren; On March 15, 1999, the Orono Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminar>' plat proposed by my wife and me. The Commission's approval was made subject to three conditions. Those conditions, and our responses to each, are as follows. 1, Provide 50* Outlot across north property line. We have chosen not to incorporate the recommended change into the preliminary plat that will be proposed to the City Co'oncil on April 12. We have a mmber of reasons for objecting to the 50' Outlot requirement. Please bear with us as we try to explain. First, creating a 50' Outlot along the entire Northerly property line makes it much that a street will be constructed within the Outlot area. The construction of a street along the North property line would deprive our property of the privacy it now enjoys, and, for that reason alone, the property is less desirable and thus less valuable. Apart from value considerations, there are issues of safety and security. These considerations are adversely affected by the creation of a city street, which, in addition to providing ^jesired access to our property, would serve as its primary purpose to mrke other properties sitimted to me North and East more accessible. With that increase in accessibility also comes more traffic and me resulting loss of privacy, safety and security. Creation of the 50' Outlot also raises issues with respect to fair :ss and the public interest. The neighbors to our East in the Wear Lane neighborhood, as well as our neighbors to the West m the Crystal Creek neighborhood, are strongly opposed to the creation of such an access street. \Vi respect to providing access to the North, the City could not have been clearer in stating its'vritten condition to the developer of the Cr^'stal Creek subdivision when it declared in ResolutionNo.3896 dated May 12,1997 approving the Crystal Creek subdivision; Ms. Elizabeth Van Zomeren April 2,1999 Page 2.. 7. Outlet B may be residentially developed in the future___The subdivider shall be responsible for providing legal access to the property---- . • ‘ The subdivider, in accepting the City's plat approval, also accepted the above-stated condition, and is reasonably and legally bound to honor it now. Fui^ermore, there remains ample opportunity for the subdivider to acquire land to the East, and thereby obtain access to his property &om Old Crystal Bay Road. That task is his responsibility, as stated in Resolution No. 3896, not the City’s, and certainl y not ours. If land is to be taken from any property to serve the subdivider’s Outlot B, it should be taken from the subdivider’s own subdivision, which, in this case, would be Lots 6 and 7 of Block 1, Crystal Creek. That would be eminently more fair than taking the land from us, especially since the subdivider profited from the creation of those Lots 6 and 7. The subdivider has caused his own problem, and should be responsible for its solution. Please do not make us solve it. Our next objection is based on the loss of acreage that we would suffer from the taking of the Outlot. The creation of a 50’ Outlot across the Northerly boundary of our property results in a loss of 22,752.5 square feet of land, or somewhat more than one-half acre. That loss of acreage, not to mention the loss of acreage resulting from other Planning Commission suggestions, makes it much less likely that the Norfrierly lot could be subdivided into two lots in the future, especially in view of the City's 150% requirem‘ents for back lots. Zoning District RR-IB standards require two acres of dry buildable area. Therefore, the rriinimum area for each such lot would need to be 150% of that acreage, or three dry acres. With the taking of the Outlot, there is barely enough land to accommodate two lots of three acres each, and this situation is exacerbated because we cannot divide the property on an equal 50/50 basis because of the topography and existing natural conditions. This is truly a significant problem for us. When we purchased the propertv* we expected, and we think reasonably so, that we would have several subdivision alternatives for it m view of the acreage. However, after consulting with different surveyors, a land planner, the septic designer, as well as our architect and builder, we have concluded that, as a result of terrain and wetlands, there are just two building sites in the Northern part of the property. All other ^tematives vvould require the removal of the precious stand of pine trees, as well as substantial clearing and considerable, and expensive, alteration of the natural amenities. Another significant reason for our opposition to the 50' Outlot is that its creation takes away critical septic sites in the Northeast comer of the property. While Aese septic sites are not shown on our proposed subdivision, they are shown on an earlier application proposed by John Vogt and Mike Hilbelink. The City's taking of the 50' Outlot and the septic sites located there prevents us from situating our house in that area, which is our first and best choice for the location of our home. A further reason we oppose the Outlot is that there does not seem to be any good reason to require it in the first place, except, as 1 have heard, and to quote one of the members of the Planing Commission, "it would be nice to have". To quote another member of the Planning Coinmission, "if we don't take this opportuniw to get the Outlot, we may never have another opportunity." • • • i / • Ms. Elizabeth Van Zomeren April 2,-199^ Page 3 The taking of the Outlet, or the imposition of the Outlet requirement on this plat, is apparently based on that part of the City's Ordinances found in Section 11.32, Subdivision 2.B.6., where the following language is found; ... proposed roadways shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be subdivided,... However, the foregoing language is qualified by t\vo exceptionsj one exception applying where topography or other physical conditions mitigate against the extension of the roadway, and another exception allowing the City to make a judgment call that the extension is not "necess^ or desirable for the coordination of the layout of the subdivision...." Both exceptions are applicable in this instance. Tne e.xtension of the roadway is in fact prevented by physical conditions, in this case bees and topography, and the layout is not necessary or desirable for the coordination of the layout of this subdivision with adjoining subdivisions. Moreover, no roadway whatsoever is proposed with respect to this subdivision. While a driveway could be located off of Crystal Creek Road, and while a driveway location is proposed from Watertown Road next to ^e proposed Lot 2, no “roadway is proposed. That being the case, paragraph 6 of the Ordinance is not applicable. Instead, paragraph 4 of the same Subdivision 2 is applicable, which reads as follows. Roadways shall be laid out to conform as much as possible to the topography, to discourage use bv throueh traffic, to permit efficient drainage and utility systems, and to require the minimum number of roadwavs necessai}' to provide convenient and safe access to property. (Emphasis added.) In view of our objections to the Outlot, and since both the Wear Lane and Crystal Creek neiehborhoods also oppose creation of the Outlot, the City Council's focus should be on the lan^age of ^e above-quoted paragraph 4, and particularly the words "to discourage use by through traific . Our final reason for opposing the creation of the Outlot is that the Citj-’s taking of this Outlot acreage amounts to a condemnation thereof because the taking is unrelated to the two-lot subdi\nsion of the tract. While the taking may accommodate future public works with respect to properties to the West, North and East, and while the property to the North would surely benefit from and be enriched by access over the Outlot, none of that is related to the tw'o-lot subdivision that we propose. In view of the taking of the Outlot, and because no compensation for the taking is propo^, the constitutionality of the Planning Commission ’s recommendation must be challenged. TO sanctitN' of private property is w'ell recognized under our law's. While private property ma\ be en for a governmental purpose, just compensation must be paid. The only justifiable reason that tos property is being taken is for perceived municipal uses at some future date, which mumcipal uses have nothing whatsoever to do with the two-lot subdivision proposed by us at this time Accordingly, our final reason for opposing the taking of the Outlot is that it would b unconstitutional to do so. Ms. Elizabeth Van Zotneren April 2.1999 Page 4 * • 2. Provide 30* access Outlot for back lot instead of "flag lot" design. • • * ' We also oppose the 30' Outlot suggested by the Planning Commission for reasons similar to those noted in our opposition to the Northerly Outlot. We oppose the creation of this Outlot because it removes critical acreage that could be credited to a subsequent division of Lot 1 to the North. The loss of area that results from the creation of this Outlot would be 10,680 square feet, or approximately one-quarter acre. Notwith^^ding the size of the lot, in the event of a further subdivision we run up against the three-acre minim^ and site limitations previously mentioned. Thus, we need every square foot we can muster to satisfy the required acreage minimums. Another reason we oppose the creation of this Outlot is that there does not appear to be good reason to require it. Our understanding from conversations with City Staff is that historically this type of flag lot was opposed only when lakeshore was involved. However, that is not the case here. Further, with the potential for access to Lot 1 at its Northwest comer by way of an easement over Crystal Creek Road, there was even some question in Staffs mind, as expressed at the Planning Commi*ssion hearing, as to whether an Outlot should be recommended in this situation. Therefore, because the historic reason for opposing a flag lot is not present here, because there does not appear to be clear direction from Staff requiring the establishment of an Outlot, and because creation of an Outlot adversely affects subsequent acreage computations with respect to a possible subdivision of the rear lot, the creation of this meaningless Outlot at the front is opposed. 3. City Staff to grant administrative variances for septic location, if appropriate. This requirement of the Planning Commission is not opposed ^ The requirement is advantaseous to us, and is accepted. We will work with Staff to address this matter. Thank you for this additional opportunity to address these matters. Sincerely, Jim and Debra Renckens JRR/ldd WINSTON LAW OFFICE April 14,1999 Richard N. Flint Gray Plant Mooty Mooty & Bennett, PA ‘ ‘ 33 South Sixth Street, #3400 Minneapolis, MN 55402-3796 RE: James R. Renckens Subdivision Application Dear Dick: Jim Renckens and 1 wish to thank you for giwng us a sympathetic ear^ on Monday evening. While you ultimately voted against us on ^e rear outlet issue, it was clear to us that you were making every effort to understand and be sympathetic •with our position. We believe, rightly or wrongly, that, had Charlie Kelly not spoken so adamantly against us, we would have been able to proceed without the outlot. Now, with the rear outlot requirement imposed, I am not sure that Jim Renckens will buy the property, and I would hate to lose him as a neighbor and resident of the City of Orono. I hope to talk to Charlie Kelly in the near future. I have known Charlie for a number of years and he is a friend.* 1 was somewhat taken aback that he spoke so adamantly against us. In any event, thank you for gi\ing us a fair hearing on Monday night. I am sorry your vote supported the imposition of the outlot. In view of the outcome, I have some concern that I did not effeaively advocate my client's position, a position which I support, being a resident of the same neighborhood myself. We are not opposed to working cooperatively wth the City where public works are for the benefit of the community or the particular neighborhood in question. Here, we feel strongly that the creation of a street 'vvould be of great detriment to the neighborhood and of no real benefit to the City. The creation of the outlot along the Northerly edge of the Stubbs/Renckens property devalues the same, and has immediate adverse impaas on the Crystal Creek neighborhood, and particularly Lots 6 and 7. The thought that this outlot might at some future date be linked to the street in front of my house, and that the street in front of my house might be linked to a street serving properties to my West and North is of such ^l^^m and concern to me that I have been distressed ever since I walked out of City Hall Monday night. This has not been a good week. I am deeply concerned that Mr. Renckens ■will now not purchase the property, and I wanted to have him as a neighbor and as a resident of the City of Orono. I am as distressed about the possible future loss of safety, security and privacy with the possible linkage c t vVear Lane to other roads to 4420 IDS Center, SO SoulK 8tk Street, Minneapolis. MN 55402 Tel: 5l2;-341.9800 Fa.x: 612/338-6351 April T4, 1999 Page 2 my North and West. With three small children at home who use the cul-de-sac in front of our home as a playground, I am already alarmed by the driving of the son of one of my neighbors. I see that many times compounded should other lots and the teenage sons of their owners have sirrdlar access to the road in front of my house. These are real concerns, as I try to flag down the offending driver, and yell at him to slow down. My concents have nothing to do with snow removal concerns or "good dty plarming", but they are a great deal more important to me and my farruly than convenience to a snow plow operator. I have gone on too long, and I have made this more a personal diatribe than I had wanted. Accordingly, I close by again thanking you for hearing us out Monday night. Sincerely, JBW/krm cc: James R. Renckens Mayor Gabriel Jabbour Charles Kelly Robert Sansevere John B. Winstori WINSTON LAW OFFICE April 14, 1999 iiiL^ B' Council Member Robert Sansevere Orono City Hall 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: James R. Renckens Subdivision Application Dear Bob: Thardc. you for hearing us out the other night and reacting favorably to our subdivision proposal. Both Jim Renckens and I are appreciative of your effort to listen to and understand our arguments against the outlots recommended by the Planning Commission. It was dear to us from your questions that you cared about our position and were willing to vote in favor of it, notwithstanding Charlie Kelly's strong support of the rear outlot. In that regard, I have known Charlie for many years and he is a friend. I was surprised that he spoke so adamantly against us. My intention is to address a letter to him as well, and to invite a meeting at which I or Jim Renckens and I can further express our concern, not only with respect to the ouUot required by the Council at Monday evening's hearing, but also the possible connection to Wear Lane. My neighbors and I strongly oppose that connection, and do not see how City interests are advanced when the residents of the community most affected by the road connection are all opposed to the same. It seems to me that whenever possible the "City’s interests" should be adapted and adjusted to fit the interests of the Cit/s residents. It was clear to me and Jim that you were sympathetic to that position, and we most appreciate your speaking out on Monday evening in our favor. Keep up the good work. We are happy to see you on the Orono City Council. Sincerely, John B. Winsto JBW/krm cc: James R. Renckens Mayor Gabriel Jabbour Charles Kelly Richard Flint 4420 IDS Center, 80 Soutk 8lK Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel: 612/341-9800 Fax: 612/338-6351 WINSTON LAW OFFICE April 14,1999 Charles Kelly . Compass Capital Management. 706 Second Avenue South, #400 Mirmeapolis, MN 55402 RE: James R. Renckens Subdivision Application Dear Charlie: I am writing to you, as you might have anticipated, to discuss with you further the James R. Renckens Subdivision Application and the outlot requirement imposed Monday night. The Council's decision has been troubling to my client and me ever since the vote went against us on the 50-foot oudot at the rear of the property. \Vhile I have appeared before the Orono City Council enough times to know the process, and while I have participated in the process, I always come away dissatisfied that a City Council hearing is not a good place to engage in a meaningful dialog with respect to the issues that the Council may face on any partiodar evening. I would much rather sit down with Council members in a less formal envirorunent with proponents and opponents alike and try to talk things out around a conference room table. That setting was not afforded us Monday night by reason of the process, and I understand the legal requirements that you are up against. Thus, let me take this opportunity to commence a less formal dialog. The rear outl t is a disaster for the property. You have heard our expressions of concern Mth resj. ect to privacy, safety and security. You will also see copies of my letters to the other Council members, and partiailarly my letter to Mr. Flint where I again state my concern as a neighbor of the property. Further concerns involve our now having to leave the rear 50 feet untouched, as this area is to be a separate outlot, and cannot be developed. That situation is exacerbated by our having to compute setbacks from the Southerly line of the outlot. Further, with this being a rear lot, my understanding is that the setback becomes 150% of the normal setback, and that, in this case, that would amount to 75 feet. In effect, the City’s taking of the 50 feet for oudot purposes creates a 125-foot wide no man’s land at the rear of the subject property. But it is not just the loss of 125 feet or the resulting loss of use of the acreage involved. What I would like you to do is to go back to Mr. Renckens' letter that is part of the City’s record. Jim’s April 2 letter, copied herewith, well sets forth the arguments against the oudot. 1 would like you to focus on those aspects of the letter 4420 IDS Center, 80 SoutK 8tK Street, Minneapolii, MN 55402 Tel: 6l2.341.9800 Fax: 612.338.6351 April i4, 1999 Page 2 and on those aspeas of our position which emphasize the commuruty*s oppositiori to the outlot requirement imposed by the City Council. ‘ I would like to believe that the interests of the community affected are consistent with the interests of the City, and, should the community be opposed to the imposition of the outlot, the City should conform its position to that of the community. When none of us wants a through street, and when none of us sees any benefit in a through street, I would hope that the City could see it within its power and discretion to avoid the through sueet. Charlie, I know you are sincere in your belief, and I know that you work hard for the City. My hope is that there is stiU some way that your sincerity and hard work and my own can coincide with respea to this issue. Thaidc you for further considering this matter. I will try to reach you by telephone to raise these matters again, but I wanted you to have this introduction in advance. Sincerely, John B. Winston JBW/krm Enclosure cc: James R. Renckens Mayor Gabriel Jabbour Richard N. Flint Robert Sansevere James R. R enckens B 4680 Forestview Lane Pl)'mouth, Minnesota 55442 (612) 559-2380 % ii..* V - -a-'April 23, 1999 Ron Moorse Orono City Adnunistrator Orono City Hall 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 APR 2 6 1999 QVn Or OaC.\'0 Re: James K. Renckens Class III Preliminary Plat Subdivision Application Zoning File No. 2466 Dear Mr. Moorse: On April 12, 1999, the Orono City Council recommended approval of the preliminary plat proposed by my wife and me with respect to the property at 3020 Watertown Road. The Council ’s approval, however, was made subject to the condition that an Outlot be platted along the northerly boundary of our property. After much reevaluation, we have determined that such condition presents overwhelming problems for us. We respectfully request, therefore, that the Council ’s hearing on our application for preliminary subdivision be reopened. Our request is made due to the foregoing reason, because certain material information presented at the April 12* meeting was factually incorrect, and because the full City Council did not have the opportunity to hear the matter. We also have new information to present Council that may be helpful in its deliberations. Further. I can confirm that we are now the fee owners of the property having closed on the purchase from the Stubbs family as we comrmtted. We request that this matter be addressed by the City Council at its meeting on Monday, May 10,1999. In so doing, we understand that at least one member of the Council who voted on this matter the evening of April 12* must move to reopen the hearing. Therefore, we will contact Council members Kelly, Flint and Sansevere in advance of that date to discuss our request. Thank you for placing this item on the Counc.l agenda for further consideration. Sincerely, Jim and Debra Renckens JRR/ldd Application Date: Completion Date: 3/17/99 3/17/99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING MAY 1 0 1999 Cl IY UH OnoivO DATE: 5/6/99 ITEM NO,L Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2477 George W. Stickney 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South Preliminary Plat for Cry stal Bay Preserve 8 Lot Subdivision Zoning District:RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) Lot Area:20.21 acres Application: The applicant has proposed an 8 lot subdivision for property located at 250 and 340 Old Crystal Road. The subdivision includes two existing residential .sites located north of the Luce Line Trail and east of Old Ciy'stal Bay Road. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: Approve the preliminary plat subject to the conditions in the draft resolution attached for your review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plat subject to the conditions in the resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A CLASS III SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 250 AND 340 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH CRYSTAL BAY PRESERVE FILE NO. 2477 WHEREAS, George W. Stickney (hereinafter the "subdivider") on March 17, 1999, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of an eight (8) lot residential plat of property legally described as: Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 229, Hennepin County, Minnesota, And that part of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 229, lying southerly of a line dravm parallel \vith and 240 feet southerly, as measured at right angles to the North line of said Lot 1, and lying westerly of a line drawn parallel with, and 1070 feet easterly as measured at right angles, to the West line of said Lot 1 (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the Municipal Code of Ordinances, Chapter 10 (Zoning Code) and Chapter 11 (Subdivision), the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 19,1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on May 10,1999 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the RR-IB One Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2.The subdivision is located over two existing residential sites located at 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South. The entire site is 20.21 acres, with 1.17 acres as designated wetland and 19.04 acres dry buildable. 3.The proposed plat consists of eight residential lots each meeting or exceeding the two acre minimum requirement for the zoning district. Page 1 of 8 ------ 4. Lots 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8 meet all lot standards for lot width, lot size and have demonstrated adequate building sites. 5. Lots 3, 4 and 5 frc t on the proposed cul-de-sac and do not meet the defined minimum 200' lot width requirement as measured at the rear line of the defined front yard. Lot 3 has a defined lot width of 130’, Lot 4 has a defined lot width of 115' and Lot 5 has a defined lot width of 170'. However, the granting of a lot width variance for each lot is justified by the fact Lots 3, 4 and 5 contain suitable building sites meeting all requirements without the need for further variances. 6. The front lot line for each lot is proposed Outlot A, to serve as a private road. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Lots 1 and 8 are located adjacent to Old Crystal Bay Road South. The side yard adjacent to the street have recognized setbacks of 50 ’. The lots are not to have any access to Old Crystal Bay Road. All eight lots shall be served by a private road designated on the plat as Outlot A. Proposed lot 2 contains an existing residence that is intended to remain on the site. A bam and storage building are located to the east of the residence. The building is located within the required yard setbacks or over the property line. The bam and storage building shall be removed upon completion of the plat. The subdivider intends to remove both buildings. The property located at 340 Orono Orchard Road South contains a residence, garage and a storage building that shall be removed from Lots 7 and 8. The proposed private road to be constructed in Outlot A is 700' in length. This length is allowed for roads ending in a cul-de-sac. The platted Outlot A cul-de-sac (100') and road (50') meet established standards for width in the Subdivision Ordinance. Private residential streets serving eight units are required minimum paved width of 28' and the cul-de-sac is to be paved with a 40' radius. Construction standards are established in the Subdivision Ordinance in Section 11.33, Subdivision 4. Page 2 of 8 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. The proposed location of the intersection with Old Cty.stal Bay Road South and Deer Run Trail is to be approved by the Director of Public Services. The large parcel located to the east of the subdivision is held by the Department of Natural Resources. The DNR has not stated they would be requesting any access to the property over the private road. No access is necessary to the south for connection to the Luce Line Trail. The property to the north has been developed into single family homes. No future connections to the north are located adjacent to the Crystal Bay Preserve subdivision. A stormwater management pond is located on proposed Lot 5. However no detail has been provided for construction of the pond. Lot 5 is 2.9 acres in size with 2.5 acres being contiguous dry buildable. The area containing the pond shall not be included in the dry buildable area for the lot. The plat should designate the pond and adjust the lot area to accommodate the NURP pond. A large Orono wetland is located over Lots 5,6 and 7. A Wetland and Conservation easement is necessary' to protect the wetland from future development and to preserv'e existing vegetation. Two septic sites have been identified on each lot. The soil testing and plans completed by DH Excavating, dated March 31,1999, has been reviewed by Staff and conditionally approved, subject to applicant providing some additional information as specified in the Septic Review report dated May 6, 1999. A ten foot trail easement she aid be dedicated along the west edge of the property. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide alo.»>g the right-of-ways. The applicant has proposed a stomiwater management plan which will include stormwater ponding on Lot 5 to provide for stormwater treatment. The City Engineer has recommended reducing the size of the outlet pipe located under the Luce Line Trail. Reducing the size of the outlet pipe will reduce the rate of storm water downstream but will increase the high water level of the wetland. The City Engineer, DNR, and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District shall review the Final Plans. Page 3 of 8 20. The Park Commission reviewed the application on April 5, 1999 and recommended the applicant dedicate additional land to move the existing bike trail further from Old Crystal Bay Road. When the trail was built an easement was not granted resulting in the trail being located next to the road. 21. The Planning Commission reviewed the application on April 19, 1999 and recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0 to approve the eight lot subdivision of Crystal Bay Preserve. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That based upon one or more of the finding noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat of Crystal Bay Preserve for George W. Stickney at 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South per preliminary plat drawings by Mark S. Gronberg, a licensed surveyor of Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. dated March 17, 1999 subject to the following conditions: 1.A variance will be granted for width of Lots 3,4 and 5 which do not meet the 200' width requirement for the RR-IB zoning district. 2.All Lots shall access to the private road in Outlot A. No direct access to Old Crystal Bay Road shall be allowed for any Lot. All existing accesses to Old Crystal Bay Road shall be removed prior to City final approval of the private road construction. 3.The private road in Outlot A shall be constructed to City private road requirements, subject to a Developers Agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Private road construction can begin as soon as the engineering plans for the road as well as stormwater management plans have been approved by the City and the Developers Agreement has been executed. 4.Private road access shall be from Old Crystal Bay Road subject to condition- for such access to be approved by the Director of Public Services. 5.The private road shall be privately owned and maintained per the appropriate access easement/maintenance documents to be executed by the developer. The developer shall create a homeowners association for such ownership and maintenance. Page 4 of 8 r 6. 7. No building permits will be issued until the private road is completed and all stormwater management improvements have been completed by the developer and approved by the City. The developer shall grant to the City an underlying Road and Utilities Easement for Outlot A. 8. The developer shall grant Drainage and utility easements 5 feet along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along the right-of-ways. 9. The bam and storage building located on Lot 2 shall be removed. 10. The existing buildings located on Lot 7 shall be removed. 11. Subflivider shall plant boulevard trees along the private road per the requirements of Section 11.60, Subdivision 2. 12. Subdivider shall construct stormwater management improvemei.ts to be shown on the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan to be submitted with the final plat application. A final Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan must be approved by the City Engineer prior to final plat approval. Subdivider shall grant drainage easements over all drainageways and stormwater ponds with the plat. 13. Subdivider is hereby advised that the City will not grant final plat approval until the MCWD has approved all grading and drainage improvements on the property. 14. All identified primary and alternate sewage system drainfield sites within the subdivision shall be fenced prior to any land alterations, and such fencing shall remain inplace until such time that each Lot is developed. 15. Subdivider shall develop covenants for each lot for protection of drainfield sites within each Lot. Covenants shall include protection for alternate septic sites along with site plans locating both primary and alternative sites. The covenant shall alert future property owners of the need to protect identified sites. Page 5 of 8 16. Applicant shall submit additional testing on soils found to have a seasonal water table at less than one foot due to eroded topsoil. Complete designs for the primary dn infield sites on each lot must be submitted and approved. Each drainfield site must be located on tlie survey to assure setbacks to property lines, wetlands and the NURP pond. 17. Subdivider shall supply to the City complete wetland delineation reports prior to application for final plat. 18. The applicant shall abandon the existing septic site located on the 340 Old Crystal Bay Road property with application for demolition permit for the existing residence. 19. Payment of Park Dedication Fee or Land Dedication per City Ordinance. 20. Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire one year from the date of Council preliminary plat approval. Should the subdivider fail to the filing of the final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application wiiii the City. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals shall be submitted to the City two (2) weeks prior to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting: 1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1'-200'. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines per survey by Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. dated March 17, 1999. B. Dedication of all drainage, utility, conservation and flowage easements. C. Dedication of trail easement along Old Crystal Bay Road. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: A. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. Page 6 of8 3. B.The applicant shall provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C. D. E. Signed and executed drainage, conservation and flowage easements. Signed and executed Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit. Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over Outlot A. F.Signed and executed covenants defining responsibility for construction and maintenance for Outlot A, defining future financial obligations. G. Completed application for private road name. FEES TO BE PAID: A. Final plat fee: $200.00. B. Legal review and filing fee: $200.00. C. Park Dedication Fee 6 new lots x $4,900 = $29,400. Page 7 of 8 i li • L Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of May, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss ) Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of May 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 8 of 8 TO:Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator FROM:Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager DATE:May 6, 1999 SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2477, George Stickney - Preliminary Plat The proposed eight lot subdivision includes septic system testing for two drainfields on each lot. The soil testing and site plan completed by DH Excavating and dated March 31, 1999 has been conditionally approved. The Plat includes an existing residence which has a septic system that has been confirmed by the City to be non-compliant will current State Rules. Two drainfield sites have been identified on this lot. The new lots have also been tested to confirm the presence of two drainfield sites. These drainfield sites appear to meet all City and State Regulations. Staff review of the soil testing and septic system design revealed that some additional information would be necessary prior to final plat. Some additional soil testing will be required to avoid soils found to have a seasonal water table at less than one foot due to eroded topsoil. Also, complete designs for the primary drainfield sites on each lot must be submitted and approved. In addition, each drainfield site must be accurately located on the surv'ey to assure setbacks to property lines, wetlands and the NURP pond. All drainfield sites must then be fenced off prior to any grading or land alteration on the property. Based on the above information, staff would recommend approval of the application. TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Staff RE:#2477 George W. Stickney/Mid US Properties Limited Partnership, having an interest in 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road Class 111 Preliminary Plat Subdivision —Public Hearing Exhibits: A B C D E F G H Zoning: Application Plat map Property Owner's list Topo Map Proposed Survey City Engineer's letter Assessor's calculation Summ; of Park Commission's comments RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Rural Service/Rural ResidentialComprehensive Plan: Application: The applicant is proposing to purchase the two properties located at 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road to subdivide them into 8 lots. The existing residence at 250 Old Crystal Bay Road would be retained and located on proposed Lot 2. The residence at 340 Old Crystal Bay Road would be removed. U2477 Stickney 250 & 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision PC-4/1 9/99 page-1 PARCEL INFORMATION Property Identification: The subdivision includes the following parcels: 250 Old Crystal Bay Road 04-117-23 24 0004 340 Old Crystal Bay Road 04-117-23 13 0001 The property at 250 Old Crystal Bay Road is owned by Joan Thompson. The property at 340 Old Crystal Bay Road is owned by Rodney Lee Minnick. Both properties have single family residences with out buildings. DESCRIPTION OF AREA The proposed subdivision is bordered by Old Ciy'stal Bay Road on the east, a developed residential neighborhood to the north, Department of Natural Resources (DNR) land to the east, and the Luce Line Trail to the south. TOPOGRAPHY The site slopes upward from Old Crystal Bay Road to the existing residence at 250 Old Crystal Bay Road, approximately 10 feet. The parcel slopes away from the residence at the south and east to a wetland along the Luce Line trail. There are two wetlands on the site near the Luce Line Trail. The National Wetland Inventory map indicates that the westerly wetland is "PEMC" which is a palustrine, emergent wetland which is seasonally flooded. The easterly wetland is "PUBF” which is palustrine, with a unconsolidated bottom. The wetlands total 1.3 acres. #2477 Stickney 250 & 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South SubdtvUhyi PC-4/19/99 page-2 i LOT INFORMATION The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 20.2 acres into 8 (eight) new single family residential lots. TTie proposed lots are: Lot Number Dry Acres Total Acres Lot 1 2.05 2.05 Lot 2 3.05 3.05 Lot 3 2.24 2.24 Lot 4 2.00 2.00 Lot 5 2.50 2.90 Lot 6 2.0 2.62 Lot?2.05 2.20 Lot 8 2.20 2.20 Outlot A (proposed road).95 .95 The total lot area is 20.2 acres where 18.9 acres is dry buildable and 1.3 acres is wetland. The proposed density is 1 dwelling unit per 2.36 dry acres and 1 dwelling unit per 2.5 total acres. The proposed lots meet the minimum lot area requirements. The proposed building pads provide adequate area for construction of new single family homes. Lots 3,4, and 5 on the cul-de-sac do not me^^i ;hc minimum lot width of 200' at the 50' setback. Loti Lot 1 is proposed at 2.05 acres along Old Crystal Bay Road. This lot will have frontage on the private road. The property line along Old Crystal Bay Road will be considered the side yard adjacent to street for setback purposes. No access shall be provided from Old Crystal Bay Road. #2477 Stickney 250 & 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-3 ■ Lot 2 Lot 2 is the largest proposed lot with 3.05 acres. The existing residvitce at 250 Old Crystal Bay Road will be located on this site. This property has an existing bam and other out buildings. The bam is proposed to be removed. The bam cannot remain on the property because the reduced size of the lot would no longer be conforming for the size of the bam. The new front yard for this lot will be along the new private road even though the house faces Old Crystal Bay Road. The rear yard will be the shortest, most northerly property line. Lots Lot 3 is proposed to be 2.24 acres. The front yard will be located on the cul-de-sac. This lot will have three side yards and a rear yard as shown on the survey. The proposed building site is located in the forested area near the rear of the lot. The lot will be served from a driveway from the cul-de- sac. Lot 4 Lot 4 is proposed to be 2 acres located on the cul-de-sac. The rear back half of this lot is forested. The proposed building site is located near the center of the lot. The lot will be served from a driveway from the cul-de-sac. Lots The second largest lot is Lot 5. It is proposed to be 2.9 acres with 2.5 acres dry buildable. The lot is next to the Luce Line trail and contains a wetland. The stormwater management pond is proposed to be located on this site north of the wetland. The site will be served by a driveway from the cul-de- sac. Lot 6 Lot 6 is proposed to be 2.62 acres total with 2.0 acres dry buildable. This site is also adjacent to the Luce Line trail and contains a wetland. The lot will be served by a driveway from the private road. Lot 7 Lot 7 is proposed to be 2.20 acres total with 2.05 dry acres. This lot also contains wetlands and is adjacent to the Luce Line trail. This site contains existing out buildings serving the residence at 340 Old Crystal Bay Road. The buildings will need to be removed. This lot will have access by a #2477 Stickney 250 A 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page~4 i driveway from the private road. Lots Lot 8 will have frontage along Old Crystal Bay Road. It is also adjacent to the Luce Line trail. The existing house on the lot is proposed to be removed. This lot will have a new front yard on the private road. The lot line adjacent to Old Crystal Bay Road will be considered a side yard adjacent to street for setback purposes. No access shall be provided from Old Crystal Bay Road. The existing curb cut will need to be closed. ZONING The parcel is zoned RR-IB, Rural Residential District. The minimum lot area requirement is two (2) acres. The minimum setback requirements are noted below: Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Adjacent to Street f 2 acres, dry buildable 200’50'50'30'50’ IVetland Setback No building, excavation, grading or filling is allowed in or within 26' of the wetlands. The wetland setback will apply to lots 5-7. Septic Setbacks The minimum setback requirements for septic systems is 75' from wetlands, water supply wells and stormwater ponds. All 8 (eight) lots will be served by septic and wells. Septic sites are to be located 20' from hardcover surfaces, property lines, buildings, and buried pipes. The proposed septic sites meet the setback requirements from wetlands and property lines. Future well sites have not been identified. Proposed building sites can be served by driveways without encroaching on the 20' setback requirement. No septic reports have been received as of the writing of this staff report. The subdivider's septic %2477 Stickney 250 & 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-5 \ site designer has been in contact with the City's On-Site Septic Systems Manager, Steve Weckman. Staff will attach a septic report as an Exhibit to this report when it is available. ACCESS The preliminary plat has been reviewed by the City Engineer. The proposed location for the private road appears acceptable. It has been sent to Hennepin County for review. The proposed street section will need to be 28* to meet city standards because the number of units to be served exceeds 7. Water from the private road shall ^ diverted from Old Crystal Bay Road (County Road 84). GRADING There is an existing ditch on this parcel which serves as a drainage way for a pond. A driveway for proposed Lot 3 may cross this ditch. If so, it should not impede flows through the existing ditch. The final plan needs to identify all structures to be removed. A grading and erosion control plan should be submitted for the entire site for review. Erosion controls should be in place before any grading to protect the wetland. Erosion control measures will be required during construction of the houses emd septic sites. DRAINAGE The site is located within the French Lake Drainage district. The site drains southerly to an existing wetland along the south edge of the site. Storm water drains to the wetland from the north to the south. The flow from the north is routed through an existing ditch. Ditch stabilization may be required if the flow will continue to route through it. An alternative would be to install storm sewer to convey flows from north of the site to the stormwater management pond. The pond would need to be sized if this is the proposed drainage method. There is a 36" pipe for a southerly outlet of the existing wetland. The city's proposed stormwater management plan states that water quantity may be a problem downstream and recommends restricting the size of the pipe to 27". Reducing the outlet pipe would result in a reduction of the rate of stormwater downstream but would increase the high water level of the wetland to 966. The City Engineer will need to review the wetland outlet sizing after a drainage area map, storm sewer, and ponding calculations are provided. The calculations should be based on the total drainage area that flows into the wetland. The plans will need to be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). EASEMENTS The City Engineer has recommended that a 10 ’ trail easement be dedicated along the west property line adjacent to Old Crystal Bay Road. Internal and perimeter drainage and utility easements shall be provided 5' along all interior lot lines and 10' along perimeter lines. Drainage easements shall be #2477 Stickney 250 & 340 Old Crystal Day Road South Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page~6 provided across all wetlands, drainageways, and ponding areas. PARK DEDICATION FEE The County Assessor has reviewed the proposed subdivision and has determined that the value of the six new sites is approximately $600,000 for the raw land. The park dedication fee for six new lots would be $4,900 for each lot for a total of $29,400. The Park Commission has reviewed the proposed subdivision and has requested land dedication for the trail. Dedication of land would reduce the park dedication fee. A trail easement would accomplish the same goal. Staff recommends a 10' trail easement dedication rather than the City accepting land. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval subject to the subdivider addressing the City Engineer’s issues, including the dedication of a 10' trail easement, and a staff review of the final septic site design. Any comments for the DNR regarding drainage and from Hennepin County should be reviewed and included as exhibits to this report (not available at the time of writing). #2477 Stickney 250 &. 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-7 r A Application # ^ H 77 Date Received 3-17-^^ Amount Paid 1^0 CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ^ t a ^ I I /? /f J Cl Site address____^5*^ ? Olei CrySircjl f}c£Kcn -^ •__________, Property Identification Number (PIP') ^‘/7/7ZJ /J oo<f^ ^ ay W? z.3 fj ou<J f Please check one - Property ____abstract or_____torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Name_ Address City __ Coi/^y^TiL Dr^ Phone (home) 7 '/"a 6 Zip ^5^^Phone(work) OWNER (if dififerent than ^licant) - / } Name CJ o 6 (X oJa ' ^9-^/]'a ^>c < Address O id Chrfo! (laQf/c-jsS^J Phone (home) gr,^* Zip Phone (work)City (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size /.3 ~^zo7ZZ Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Present use (check) - Acres Total, all parcels _ vX Residential; no. of units ^ Present Zoning District Other (specify) /?/? i-n PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes _____Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) Subdivision for New Bitilding Sites _ Existing Units _ New Units Total Units id**.::.; Number of Building Sites ’’ 5 n Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) •c. ^c. __Units per'^<^'^ Acres __Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land 'yC Residential %{ }iA Other (specify)3^ M i MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION -' ly/Pajment of fees (refer to "application fees" listed below. Completed application form. ^3: Preliminary plat information on Certificate of Survey. 4. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list fi'om Hennepin County Department of Finance A»603 Govt. Center 348-3271). 5. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Zoning Ofificial's Signature ______________________________________ Date ____ MINIMUM MATERUL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FINAL APPLICATION 1 . Pajment of fees (refer to Preliminary Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, covenants, etc. Date J- / ^ 7 I APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check [X] those which apply) AiciLoplication Base Fees: Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & IIO $250.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $350.00 Subdivision Application (Class I & II) $350.00 Preliminary Subdivision Application $375.00 + $25.00/lot (Class III & all non-residential) Final Plat Application (Class III) $200.00 Legal Review and Filing: _____Subdivision only $75.00 Subdivision w/easements and covenants min. $200.00 Totals Park Fees (to be determined per Section 1 1 .62) _____ Legal and Engineering Review Fees (as incurred) _____ Renew al of Class I and II Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change from original application) _____ Renewal of Class III, Preliminary Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change fix)m original application) _____ Renewal of Final Class III Subdivision Application $150.00 (No change from original application) B. Special Impro.'cment Fees: _____ Proposed Private Roads $600.00 + $.50Aincal ft.;_____lin. ft. x .50 = $______ _____ Proposed Public Roads $900.00 + $.50/lineal ft.; lin. ft. x .50 = $ Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $900.00 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.00 + $25/stub Proposed Watermain Extension $250.00 + $25/stub Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) $200.(X) On-Site System, Site Evaluation Rev iew (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $50.00/per lot x *7 new lots 3s0 C. Flexible Application Fees/Misc. Fees _____ Variance $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) _____ Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision $100.00 _____ PRD Application with Subdivision $30.00/DweIling Unit The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Plaiuiing Conunission and Council necessary ^oyjprocess this application and ftirther agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner’s Signature on ana council necessary lOyiprocess this application and hirther agrees to pay all addiUoi Applicant must have-all submittals into the City Office 2>day»’before the Planning Commission meeting. Planning Conunission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this,qhanfe prior to the meeting. SooX^'r- ^ICT;'Cf. 'fSTAL en V Kescn ul •o ♦ ^ H Me. • til A b £ III I 1^ <o HI C/I e e ^ o bJ 3£ Kl c7l iH > K) U X CM ^ O J ® HK .1 Z^ o z M < iS X * S U U M i!;;. X X u Hi I ♦ X •• o X tu SJS® o o X X X HI •i ■• M M > Z M M X Z SSI! 4f- O•wv-. •-» M Vi mi »uy7:‘ £ V ••.7^ OlU SM H O o .1 -i X X X pC _X H ^ U X O X e Hi X X X e HI M M X X o <o o u Q X e o Z Z Q X o ZM M m M X 5 H X Z Hi X CM X *) *1 Hi X X rl >o mO Q H X o 5 .1^ ____ ^ C/l I/I w M I/I Hi < K) HI Z Z X CM X Z Z H f-4 < Z Ife Ik Mo oI O CD Hi X Hi W H H O CO S H K ^ to X I/I C/I M M»ss pM I U U U «J e in C/I CD ID in ^ «J «l ID CD CM « _ M O Q O CM .J ID X . HI ^X X in < o to X in uj in CD X o Hi M X Z CD 2l£i ^7if > < ID CM I N iH pH I CD > Xu 2;ii! ®s <H o S Q a** «/>! CO ID > X s»s IS! K O < < Z X O u U X-pM e Hi X X X X o ^ o o ^Cktn o «J M z Z X XX XX pM I--^goog CM X X X K X M X X X CM Z > Z CM X • 5 M M X Z • ZP 1- P e 5 I •7 X Ui %omIDmm i" S3 P lU iH CD X pm m i* ~ < ID bJe in •• S<3Si CD CM < X O ^ e z X CM .J C •I 1 •D U CM X ^ ID Z I O V > S K ^ M M X ^ ^ H ^o in Fj d ^ o o o 'e X X g m e u u ? ^ ID O > < tt e < ^ ID CM > X •D U CM I O I X X> m < IDm min ij X X m X X HI HI H _ Hi HI X > >• U Hi ““o3 HI > V £MM UJ 4 t- f ’ r • UJ "TT ■j^^jiji__S_-I mrotdd 777?•ssrscrsT"*?^^ y» // TT^ ’ p<TB <9 ^lirajox* *yx ■« i**m *4*»0 *<i i«^__r*« *4 MX "ointqA'Cr < (T H- I UJo r.x'-33 3 1 rrr '- ■•■ . .: I'-I-. ;S .< ^ i Bonestroo ^osene ^i| Anderlik & ivl 1 Associates Engineers & Architects Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderlik ^nd Associates. Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Principals: Otto G Bonestroo, PE • Joseph C. Anderlik. PE • Marvin L Sorvala. PE • Richard E. Turner. PE. • Glenn R. Cook. PE • Robert G Schunicht. PE • Jerry A. Bourdon. Pc • Robert W. Rosene. PE. and Susan M. Eberlin. C PA.. Senior Consultants Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PE. • Keith A. Gordon. P.E. • Robert R. Pfefferle. PE • Richard W Foster. PE • David O Loskota PE. • Robert C Russek. A I A. • Mark A. Hanson. PE • Michael T. Rautmann. PE • Ted K.Fiefd. PE. • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolfs. PE. • Sidney P. W.lisamson. PE.. LS • Robert F. Koisnrmh • Agnes M. Ring • Michael P. Rau. P.£. • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE. Offices St. Paul. Rochester. Wlllmar and Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl Website: www bonestroo com April 5. 1999 Elizabeth VanZomCTen City Planner/Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 4P.Q 0 6 (999 CiTY V.,.. Re: Crystal Bay PresCTve File No. 139-2477 Dear Liz: We have reviewed thv preliminary plat for the proposed Crystal Bay Preserve eight-lot subdivision. The site is located east of Old Crystal Bay Road and north of the Luce Line Trail in the in the northeast quarter of Section 23. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1. Access: Tl 'C proposed access location off from Old Crystal Bay Road appears acceptable. Plans shoulu be subiuilted to Hennepin County for their review. The proposed street section for the roadway will need to be 28 feet in width to meet City standards for a private street serving 7 or more units. The street should be designed so that water from the private road is diverted away from C.R. 84. Final plans should include geotechnical recommendations and street design including horizontal and vertical curve information. 2. Grading: A grading and erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review. It appears that the driveway to serve Lot 3 will need to cross the existing ditch. The ditch serves as a drainage way for an existing pond located north of this site. Driveway construction to serve this lot should not impede flows through the existing ditch. It is assumed but not stated that the existing buildings in the southwest corner of the site will be removed. Final plans should identify all structures to be removed. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any grading, particulrjly along the wetland. Additional aosion control will be needed during construction of the houses and septic systems. 3. Drainage: The draft version of the City’s’ Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shows that the site lies within the French Lake drainage district. The site drains southerly to an existing wetland located along the south edge of <lie property. Storm water from north of this site also drains to this wetland. These flows from the north are currently routed to the wetland through the existing ditch located along the eastern edge of the propertj The ditch section should be evaluated relative to erosion potential. If flows will continue to be routed through the ditch, some type of ditch stabilization may be required to prevent excessive scouring and additional erosion. An alternative to ditch stabilization would be t<’ install storm sewer to convey flows from north of the site to the proposed NURP pond. Theic flows should be included when sizing the NURP pond. Our records indicate that the southerly outlet for the existing wetland is a 36-inch diameter pipe under the Luce Line Trail. F 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 The SWMP indicates that water quantity may be a problem downstream from this site and recommends restricting this outlet to 27 inches in diameter. Reducing the size of the wetland outlet pipe will reduce the rate of storm water downstream but will increase the high water level (HWL) of the wetland to an elevation of approximately 966. We can review the wetland outlet sizing once a drainage area map, storm sewer and ponding calculations are provided. These calculations should be based on the total drainage area reaching the wetland. Final plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District fen’ their review. 4. Easements: A 10-foot trail easement should be dedicated along the west edge of the property. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of -ways. Drainage easements should be provided across all wetlands, drainage ways and pond areas. 5. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we will prq>are an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. Please contact me at 651-604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, RCSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSCXTIATES, INC. A Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono ■; I ■i prelmnary plat roRW V M AUO sue NO 229 ari i ■“l 1 HCNNEPW county. MWNESOTA • \i (j) .!«■ mt .». I M •> M« iW * «••• < j f. /• 37 T/' f'i.’ 0 m h*□ a J o Application M ^ V 77 Date Received 3-17- ^ ^ Amount Paid ItiO^ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ^ t a ^ t ! /? /f 1 Site address ____d/<sf (rySTrcil u^y —__________, Property Identification Number fPID') <?‘/7/72J /J 6o<>^ ^ ay \n 1.3 U / Please check one - Property ____abstract or____torrens? Attach legal description to application. 2. APPLICANT Name_ Address City__ o ^ Dt^ Phone (home) C/')5-2.'7S5 ^ Zip -S"5^Phone (work) Co Pr^ 'rn/t^A n OWNER (if different than app licant) _____~t^» Address C>lcf Cc,Tt^l Name City ^co^Kt r^yoL 22Vi>'~<^ 6 3^0 O^ C^al (jo., Phone (home) __Zip Phone (work)Oc"9^y (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District /T.9 /.3 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels S, n Residential; no. of units ^ 2 _______ Other (specify)_________ KBJLi5 PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes _____ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) ' Subdivision for New Building Sites *Z Existing Units ^ New Units ^ Total Units ^ 5 Number of Building Sites Proposed Gross Dcr.sitv Minimun*. Lo: 5!ze Proposed Use (check) cr Units ^ Acres 5q. ti. Liv LuUdeb’.e Lar.d Residential Other (specify) X 'J KO -4 ■4#: / 9 4^. COMMeMTS I ■: go*; coo f o'cc f - too, coo/f/rc^ A '' \/1^0 (A oF ^ /‘j(Tu/ $trC> 3T^ /fA/Ao;ri.^,!7CtY$(^^C>,0O0 i./try 1 coM^4l%^o^) n _____LL i DlX.&i: ____,(?AE4 'plF Pi^ls o'^\]\vi I s5]ou VcnSiY) 10 L/)Mb KMC3l^fW...^^>^^. ru 51] c \c A'i£.y_...Sir/i.b.\,l/ ...QLh> Ch^/S’)PL 8/)V Ux/^yUT lA)^'tx(/?L L^K/.W T/; /MAI/l daI-SHM^ Blb£ th-//lt_fUh\]jf,)L UZ-UIAL^TM _n-u^JL BujlT J\1J: OUyjjph^ LVA//i; ^0T ghiUT ^l/Li...fOsVt^SUT.^d ru£ 7li^Vt. U//^j: J ■% ate. ^ . t -fk. LLL lM— hi. k/l\\)A'o\(()^](h % CoaL\p DlrM^iAsV t])h s^hf\y _ Application Date: 3>25-99 Application Complete Date: 4-1-99 60-Day Action Deadline Date: 6-1-99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING MAY 1 0 1999 Cl I V Ut* Ofioivo Date: May?, 1999 Item No.: ^ Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2480 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Preliminary Plat Easement Vacation - Resolution LLt of Exhibits A - Resolution B - 4-29-99 Letter from Hennepin County Transportation Dept. C - Tom Crosby memo re: County right-of-way request. D - Submitted Draft Plat Drawings E - Trail Agreement F - Memo and Exhibits of April 15,1999 Easement Dedication Primary Reason for Plat Spring Hill Golf Club was issued a CUP in May 1997. One of the conditions of approval was that Spring Hill would formally grant Conservation and Flowage Easements to the City over the various wetlands and drainageways on the property. It was determined that this could be most effectively done after the approved wetland alterations and drainageway reroutings were completed, to ensure accurate legal descriptions. Due to the sheer number of wetlands and drainageways, and the complexity of their descriptions, Spring Hill has chosen to dedicate these easement areas on a plat, which staff agrees is superior to multiple pages of lengthy legal descriptions. The request also includes the vacation of two pre-existing conser%'ation and flowage easements which will be replaced by larger easements. The two being vacated are just north of Spring Hill Road and slightly west of the intersection of Spring Hill and East Long Lake Road (see Exhibit G of April 15 memo). #2480 - Spring Hill - Prelim. Plat May 7,1999 Page 2 Two Outlots Proposed At the time the application was submitted it was determined that the original preliminary plat drawings did not include a portion of the property located south of Spring Hill Road west of East Long Lake Road. This portion is part of a tax parcel located north of Spring Hill Road, and therefore will become part of the plat. This area and one other portion of the site that is north of County Road 6 and just west of Hunter Drive, will be platted as outlots. The submitted plat drawings incorporate Outlot B; however, the wetland in Outlot B has not been shown, and must be shown on the final plat drawings. As outlots, these disconnected parcels will be assigned separate PINS numbers, and it will then be possible for the Club to sell them to adjacent property owners should the Club choose to do so. Neither outlot is buildable, and the preliminary and final plat approval resolution will clearly identify this fact. Portion of Lot 1, Block 1 in Medina The northern half of Lot 1, Block 1, is in Medina. The applicant is advised to contact Medina to determine whether separate plat approval action by the Medina City Council is required. Right-of-Way Widths County Road 6 Because the property abuts County Road 6, Hennepin County was advised of this application and was requested to comment on it. In his letter of April 29 (Exhibit B) Thomas D. Johnson of the Hennepin County Transportation Dept, requests that Spring Hill dedicate additional right-of-way along County Road 6 to yield a 100' corridor. This request is to "accommodate any future roadway upgrading plus paths, utilities, snow storage, signage, etc." For a majority of the Spring Hill frontage on County Road 6, the existing right-of-way is 80'. This stretch of County Road 6 is designated on the Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan as a "Bikeway", which under the County plan would require a total of 100' of right-of-way where only 80' now exists. Orono's 1980 Comprehensive Plan defines County Road 6 as a 'minor arterial' roadway requiring a minimum right-of-way width of 80'. City policy prior to approximately 1980 was to honor such requests, as evidenced by a number of plats that occurred in the 1970's. However, during the 1980's and 1990's the City generally only approved the County's additional right-of-way requests when they were in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan minimums, or where planned County Road improvements were pending that #2480 - Spring Hill - Prelim. Plat May 7, 1999 Page 3 required added right-of-way. The City’s apparent policy was to not burden our property owners with uncompensated loss of land to right-of-ways that weren't clearly needed. The 1997 Hennepin County Bikeway Plan established a policy that requires 100% City funding of right-of-way acquisitions when the right-of-way initially requested by the County during plat review was declined by the City. Otherwise, the right-of-way funding formula is 50% City, 50% County. Orono Subdivision Code Section 11.40 Subd. 2 states: "...when the Comprehensive Municipal Plan or some other agency indicates plans for realignment or widening a road that would require use of some of the land in the subdivision, the subdivider shall be required to improve and dedicate at his expense such areas for widening or realignment of such roads...." Whether added right-of-way for future bikeways falls within the definition of " realignment or widening a road" is unclear. It is also unclear whether "future roadway upgrading" as noted by the County, rises to the level of "plans for realignment or widening" the road. What is clear is that Spring Hill is not adding new homes which would contribute to the need for a bike trail, and it is therefore also questionable whether Spring Hill is creating the need for added road right-of-way. Lacking such a connection, and lacking the 'rough proportionality' required for the dedication, it is questionable whether the taking would be legal (see Crosby's memo of April 19). The City Council may wish to review its right-of-way policy regarding subdivisions abutting a designated County bikeway route. For now, for the Spring Hill plat, staff is recommending that the request of Hennepin County for added right-of-way, be denied. City Roads The plat drawings submitted do not show the actual paved/traveled surface of Spring Hill Road, but the earlier site plans reviewed during the CUP process suggested that the road is more or less centered within its 66'+ right-of-way. The dedications for Spring Hill Road, Tamarack Drive and Hunter Drive have been reviewed by the Public Services Director and appear to be appropriate. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this pioposed plat and easement vacation/rededication at their April 19 meeting and voted 5-0 to recommend approval subject to the conditiions recommended by staff. #2480 - Spring Hill - Prelim. Plat May?, 1999 Page 4 Trail Easement The Trail Agreement (Exhibit E) in Item 1 indicates that Spring Hill will grant to the City an expansion of right-of-way for the trail along Spring Hill Road and Tamarack Drive, These dedications are not shown on the plat, eind unless shown as expanded right-of-way, would not be accepted by the County on the plat drawings. The County normally does not allow easements to appear on plats except for right-of-ways or for drainage/wetlands/utilities. Assuming that the City will ultimately come to a final conclusion on the trail locations, the easement for the portions of such trail within Spring Hill's boundaries can be created by either of 2 options: 1 . Dedication as additional road right-of-way on the plat; or 2. Granted by metes and bounds description in a separate trail easement document. The attached resolution assumes that option 2 will prevail. If Council wishes to have the right-of- ways of Tamarack and Spring Hill widened within this plat, then the language of the attached preliminary plat approval resolution will have to be revised. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed plat subject to: 1. 3. 4. 5. Creation of Outlots A and B as unbuildable property outside the intended Club boundaries; ownership of such outlots may be transferred only to an owner of adjacent land and only when legally combined with tliat adjacent land. 2. Dedication of rights-of-way for Spring Hill Road, Tamarack Drive and Hunter Drive as shown. Council to provide direction regarding County request for dedication of additional right-of- way along County Fvoad 6 portions of the plat. Staff recommends no additio nal dedication. On final plat, show the wetland on Outlot B. Execution of a conservation and flowage easement over all wetlands shown on the plat, and vacation of the existing easements at the south end of the site. #2480 - Spring Hill - Prelim. Plat May 7,1999 Page 5 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Reach a conclusion as to whether the County request for added right-of-way will be honored; and Reach a conclusion on whether the proposed trails along Tamarack and Spring Hill Road should be incorporated in this platting as widened right-of-ways or accepted by metes and bounds descriptions in a separate easement document. Adopt the attached Preliminary Plat Approval resolution per staff recommendation; direct staff to revise the resolution if the County right-of-way request is approved or if the widened right-of-way method for trail easement is chosen. i A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR THE PLATTING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - FILE NO. 2480 WHEREAS, Spring Hill Golf Club (hereinafter the "applicants" or the "Club") on March 25,1999, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a plat and for vacation and rededication of drainage easements for property legally described as: EXHIBIT A (Attached) (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono's Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 19, 1999 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportumty to speak ftiereon; and WHEREAS, after due consideration the Planning Commission on April 19, 1999 voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the proposed plat; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on May 10, 1999 the Orono City Council considered the plat and easement vacation application of the applicants and noted the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the RR-IB and RR-lB-1 Single Family Rural Residential Zoning Districts requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2.The property contains a total of approximately 200 acres of land, including a number of natural wetlands, drainageways and ponding areas. 3. The proposed plat is intended to accomplish the following purposes: Page 1 of 6 a.To result in the dedication of easements over wetlands, drainageways and stormwater management facilities on the property. b. To result in the dedication of public roads and drives. c. To create separate taxable outlets from two small unbuildable parcels of land which are currently separated from the main Club property by roads but which are not necessarily intended to remain as part of the Club property. The Outlet status will allow these two unbuildable parcels to be transferred to an adjacent property owner should the Cluj choose to do so. 4. The northerly portion of Lot 1, Block 1 is within the City of Medina, and therefore City of Medina approval will also be required for this plat. 5. Outlet A is a triangular strip of land north of County Road 6 and west of Hunter Drive, being approximately 0.8 acre in area but being approximately 880' in length adjacent to County Road 6 and averaging less than 40' in width, and therefore is not separately buildable under the standards of the RR-IB Zoning District in which Outlot A is located. 6. Outlot B is a triangular strip of land south of Spring Hill Road and west of East Long Lake Road, being approximately 3.2 acres in area, of which the approximately 90% is wetland, and therefore is not separately buildable under the standards of the LR-IA Zoning District in which Outlot B is located. 7. Lot 1 contains the Club property north of County Road 6; Lot 2 contains the Club property south of County Road 6. 8. Thomas D. Johnson, P.E., of Hennepin County Public Works Department has in his letter of April 29, 1999 requested that the applicant's grant and dedicate additional right-of-way for future use for upgrading of County Road 6 and ancillary activities. The Orono Comprehensive Plan defines County Road 6 as a 'minor arterial' roadway requiring a minimum right-of-way width of 80', which already exists. This area of County Road 6 is shown as a bikeway corridor on Page 2 of 6 the Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan. The Council is aware of Hennepin County policies regarding the sharing of right-of-way acquisition costs in relation to County requests for right-of-way innconjunction with plats. However, the Council has concluded that the mere platting of the Club property absent the creation of any hew residential lots which would generate users of such a trail, does not appear to meet the nexus and rough proportionality tests for exaction of a dedication from the developer for trail purposes. The City has chosen to not require a Park Dedication Fee of this developer for this very reason. Further, the request for added right-of-way is not accompanied by a defined County plan for an upgrade of the road. Therefore, the Council concludes that the Hennepin County request for additional right-of-way for County Road 6 must be denied. 9. The property conatins a significant number of natural wetlands and drainageways, as well as a number of wetland areas, drainageways, stormwater ponds and similar facilities that have been created or modified as a result of construction of the Spring Hill Golf Course as approved via CUP Resolution No. 3902. All such features are being shown on the plat, and Drainage Easements or Flowage and Conservation Easements as deemed appropriate will be granted bt the applicants over all said features. 10. An existing Flowage and Conservation Easement within tax parcel 26-118-23 44 0003 is no longer necessary because a new and expanded easement will be dedicated over it. Therefore, the existing easement within said tax parcel should be vacated per the applicants' request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of Spring Hill Golf Club at 725 Sixth Avenue North per plat drawings by Theodore D. Kemna, a licensed surveyor of Schoell and Madson, Inc, dated April 29, 1999 subject to the following conditions: 1.Outlot A is platted as a separate parcel north of County Road 6, and may be retained by the Club or may at the Club's discretion be sold to an adjoining property owner for legal combination with the adjoining property. Page 3 of 6 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. Outlet B is platted as a separate parcel south of Spring Hill Road, and may be retained by the Club or may at the Club's discretion be sold to an adjoining property owner for legal combination with the adjoining property. On the final plat drawings, the wetlands within Outlet B shall be shown. Applicants shall grant Flowage and Conservation Easements and Drainage Easements as appropriate over the wetlands, pionds, drainageways and stormwater facilities shown on the plat, as required in Resolution No. 3902. The existing Flowage and Conservation Easement within tax parcel 26-118-23 44 0003 will be vacated as part of the final plat approval resolution. 5. No additional right-of-way for County Road 6 shall be required by the City. The completion of the platting process is subject to approval of the City of Medina. No Park Dedication Fee is required in conjunction with this plat because no new residential building sites are being created. An easement for trail purposes along Spring Hill Road as outlined in the Trail Agreement (Exhibit D of Resolution No. 3902) shall be granted to the City as a requirement of plat approval but shall not be required to app>ear on this plat. Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire within one year of the date of Council approval. May 10, 2000. Should the subdivider fail to complete the filing of the final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. Page 4 of 6 Final Plat Submittals: The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: a. Lot lines platted per plat drawings by Theodore D. Kemna, a licensed surveyor of Schoell and Madson, Inc, dated April 29, 1999. b.Wetlands within Outlot B. c.Dedication of drainage and uiility easements 10' wide along the exterior boundaries of property and 5' along the internal lot lines. d.Designation and dedication of drainage easements over wetlands, detention ponds, drainageways, etc. as shown on the plat drawdngs. 2. Legal documents required: a.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b.The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c.Signed and executed Flowage and Conservation Easements to be taken over wetlands, drainageways and detention ponding areas within plat. 3. Fees to be paid: Total due: $200.00 a.Legal review and filing fees for subdivision and associated documents $200.00 Page 5 of 6 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of May, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this lOdi day of May, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 6 of 6 felv:Hennepin County A An Equal OppordinllT Emplcrfer v B April 29,1999 Mike Gaffron City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 APPi j 0 \yyi Gtry'-^•-c.ij.,0 Re: Proposed Plat - Spring Hill Golft'roposei CSAH6 Section 25,26, Township 118, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 2492 Review and Recommendations Dear Mr. Gaffron: Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require county review of proposed plats abutting county roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: • The developer should dedicate enough right of way to create a 100 foot corridor from and along the centerline of CSAH 6. This action will accommodate any future roadway upgrading plus paths, utilities, snow storage, signage, etc. The existing field road entrances must be removed and the ditches/slopes restored with seed or sod, as noted in Entrance Permit no. 4103. This reouirement is particularly important to enhance the easterly sight-distance at the Tamarack Drive/CSAH 6 intersection. All proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit appropriate permit forms. • The developer must restore all areas, within the county right of way, disturbed during construction. Please direct any response to Dave Zetterstrom at 745-7643. As a matter of procedure, we request that the City Clerk inform us of the City Council's action on the right of way and access provisions. Sincerely, Thomas IXTohnson, P.£. Transportation Planning Engineer TDJ:DKZ:jrh cc: PeteTulkki Brad Moe Tnuisportatlon Department 1600 Piairie Drive Medina. MN 55340-5421 (612)745-7500 FAX: (612) 478-4000 TDD: (612) 852-6760 RteycltdPaptr FROM FAECRE i BENSON [MON] 4.19'99 12:S5 ST. 12:51/NO. 4362053S43 F 5 c2 FAEGRE & BENSON LLP Minneapolis MEMORANDUM To: From : Mike Gaftron - City of Orono Thomas M. Crosby, Jr. DATE: Subject : April 19. 1999 Hennepin County Bikeway Path Last week you mentioned Hennepin County’s desire to have a bikeway County Road 6 adjacent to the Spring Hill Golf Club. A desci^iption of Hennepin County s desires is contained in your staff report of April 15 on the preliminary p a I would like to advance three theories as to why, at this time, requiring the dedication of 10 feet by Spring Hill is inappropriate. Springm p^;?Sng w^^^^ right-of-way comes up at this time. Fairness- After the conditional use permit was issued in the summer of 1997, the golf course'Wdisigned and constructed. Numerous changes were made m design of the golf course as a result of the permitting process. 1 do not want to imply that the changes are to the detriment of the golf course because I members of the golf club and the City officials are pleasirf with *e end based upon the plans as approved, much activity occuned immediately Road 6. particularly on the east end of the project Berming. /'“V"* and fencing have all occurred. All of these activities were done County right-of-way. Were the County right of-way extended to the “*‘- substantial modifications to the golf course would be required, impacting msttl Lprovements as well as. arguably, the safety of individuals using such a '^c^ pa*, in short, *e golf course relied upon the permits it received md has t^en actions which would be adversely affected now by having to give up 10 feet to *e County. lecalitv: The county’s request may not be enforceable as it runs ^oul of *e U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding land-use regulation set forth in T7o an v. City. 9i I FROM FAEGRE k BEN30N (MON) 4. IQ’09 12:33/ST. 12:31/NO. 4362053343 E 4 Memorandum to Mi]» GaHron April 19, 1999 Page 2 Tigard. 512 U.S. 374,114 S.Ct 2309 (1994), a case since cited approvingly and followed by Minnesota courts in three separate published decisions. The controversy in I^ojan , coincidentally, involved a city requiring a landowner as a condition of obtaining a building permit to dedicate a portion of her property for use as a pedestrian/bicycle pathway. The Court required the city to demonstrate a “rough proportion^ ity” between the condiUons and the contemplated development project - f.e., that the conditions imposed by the city must be related both in nature and extent to the impact of the proposed development. If, for instance. Spring Hill were seeking a permit for a densely populated residential development, a bikeway might indeed bear a reasonable relationship to the proposed use. Under the circumstances, however, a golf club is unlikely to have a significant impact, if any, on the volume of pedestrian and bicycle traffic along County Road 6. While the burden on Spring hill of making substantial modifications to the landscaping already constructed on its property would be significant, the benefit of the bikeway right-of-way bears no r^nable relationship to the project, and thus runs afoul of the “rough proportionality ” analysis adopted by the Supreme Court in polan . In summary, the request of the County is significant 1 do not want to make more of it thain is necessary but do believe it will cause problems for Spring Hill. cc:Tim Johnson Andrew Hunter TMC/nlj Ml:4tt207.01 8 9 m jrmf ,------------ ••• T ^ 3:^ *to ^ V j^ cew .,•7. !'\ ■'V ' / ItI / ;.' V ^ 3 O '* S' ^ 311“ ^ ^/V jp^ ^ VT^V-^. ' iO u»\\ ^ 3 OP61U - gTY»/ ^ ^ ^ JO JS 3m Jm JO uii Oft JPiiJO 3M1 iSM -J w jsufNmiaJ A ^, v-W \\ ■m\^ m' \' »\ JO t/t iSlO Mi JO JfOl jSL \ v\----------- \ ' irtuA \___ ^ ^ ^ ^--------------------- .. St# y. / t\V- V V V \ M «o tsm »u JO Ml Sa^V \' \ \ Aow 0 \ •\ __ / \ \ \/ \ \ J / Am a J .-'J / i7 . 1 •tMMJsn *uw . "^j, ' --------- /I 3 M -*»•/«-. — ■A 3 0VM\m-w-. ------^¥/#/------ \A • § ?! «• * M jOS.Ot^ S ---- •—9l'6l9g-------- y:? K s t /» K / ► -- »#• ♦ >*< / DOCDOC300• h- •on 1 1 200•(r.•o • 1 1 \ 1 o < S ujc:a A ^ 1 -<• 3 c'?8I Ts’s* r" 5 ?.ss Ulo o (0 llJ 1x1 in o UIq (/) t . / . UiXto ■Ji 4 1i ••V ^ “ ' ■fv" SI N •% I Q I :8 CD 3 O IL oo o ^ I flC CL 0) 8 1 8 I I - 5 ^ L c2i5—I h-- 5I.e1 . I si #«»7 ^ ovV CKW Uiv/7CJ^^1 -‘••ttr/--------------- \.f ,9| ^ ^ M ^SM Mi J0 JW, HUH» ■ , 8ses$ } i JSP,9ojn s / ^ se“ Z ^ *2^ 5 Nti i^ :■■'<< a^siSa I \ ^ --IT y WDlK ( X/ / -----y •’\5 '■ \ FROM -FAEORE k BENOON (MON) 4. 19’00 12:35 ST. 12:31. NO. 4S62o5So4o P 5 srrD luesoLtmON no . 3902 •’TRAIL AGREEMENT CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into thia day o f — . 1997, by and between the City of Orono , a municipal coiporation organized unde^^i^laws of the State of Minnesota (hcielnaftcr uJled Xity") and Spring HiU Golf Club, a Minnesota nonprofit eerpemdoa, its heizs, suoeesaors end assigna, (hereinafter called ’•Spring Hill”) 'WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Spring HUl has made application to the City Council for approval of the construction and operation of a golf course; and WHEREAS, (be City Council has granted approval for such development on the condition that Spring 1^ av UI pro^de certain easements and construction activities and centralize certain costs for the City's trail system on the perimeter of the Spring Hill property. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, «nd of one dollar and other good and valuable consideration, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Spring RBU will deed to die City for nominal consideration an easamcDt to extend die City's right-of-wny ^iproximately ten feet north ’>s cxi** right-of-way along Spring HUl Road ftom East Long Lalce Road to County Road ^ Mi feet east of the iight*of^way of Tamarack Drive fiom County Road 6 to the City line. In some eases, more than ten feet will be required. The precise esqjanrion of the right-of way will vary depenefing on the topography and may in some cases exceed or be leas then ten feet. Any modificadon of die ten feet easement refhrred to in this paragraph is subject to mutual agraameot of the City and Spring Hill. 2. Orono will design a trail system within the City right-of-way, as expanded, which trail system to the extent It b on the right-of-way donated by Spring Hill will be subject to the reasonable approval of Spring Hill. It is the intent of the parties that the proposed trail provide a scenic bff*road pedestrian and cross-countiy ski trail with minimum impact upon Golf Club and without hazardous conditions for the trail users. Page 1 of 3 1 FROM FAEGRE k EENOON (MON) 4. 19'99 12:S4-0T. 12:5l^NO. 4362(>5ci34o P . 6 3. Spring Hill will, At its constnict m tnul along Spring HUl Road west of Bast Long Lake Road and nords on Tamarack to Wetland Number 12, with the following characteristics: (a) The trail will be for pedestrian and cross-country aiding use and will not be designed for bicycles or snowmobiles. (b) The trail clearing will be approximately four feet wide. (c) Wood chips, ifrequested by die City» will be provided as the traveled surface. 4. Ihe trail on Tamanck Drive coinmencing at Wetland Number 12 and north will be suldect to ftituie design and construction. 5. In addition to the construction undertaking above. Spring Hill will contribute up to $20,000 towards trail construction in die vicinity of the golf course. 6. .. City staffand engineers will participate in the layout and engineering ofthe trail, at the. City's expense. City will be responsible for obtuning all permits required for the trail. 7. Spring Hili agrees to tnmsfer to the City two-diirds of die excess weUand mitigadon credits resulting ftom constniction of the golf course in Orono. The credits will be for trail system and, to the extent any remain, will be available to the City of Orono. The remaining one- third will be retained by Spring Hill for possible future modificatioas of the golf course, subject to applicablt laws government approvals. Spring Hill agreca not to sell or otherwise tzanafer these credits from die golf course site. 8. Spring HUiinay construct a! its expense, a rustic ^lit rail fence between the IraD and the golf course on those locadons where, for safety and sqporatlon reasons, planting and berming is not foarible. Spring Hill will not construct any fence which will prevent the free movement of wild life in the area of the golf course. 9. The City will have le^nsibility for maintenance and repair of the trail after initial eonstfuetion. e 10. Spring Hill will not be obligated to complete construction ofthe trail until completion of the golf course. The parties agllcipate that the trail will be ready for use concurrently with the opening of the golf course. The flnal design of the trail system will be determined after the final grading plans have been determined and after the rough grading for the golf course has been ooixqrleted. 11. The restrictions on the Orono Trail set forth herein shall restruict only that portion of die trail on the right-of-way donated by Spring HUl and shall not restrict the City's trail on its Page 2 of3 r FROM .FAEGRE k BENSON I (MON) 4.19*99 12:34/ST. 12:3l/NO. 4362053343 P 7 other pippetties or B^it9-of*'wey. ineludmg, without lisaititioa. tiie rights-of-wiy adjoinii^ Spziag Hill*. IN WnrtlBSS WHEREOF* tfusagreemeot has bea executed by the duly authorued ofificen of eadi of the foiegoiog. Attest Attest CITY OF ORONO SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB Its r ineS^jcL • • • Pege3on f Application Date: 3-25-99 Application Complete Date: 4-1-99 60-Day Action Deadline Date: 6-1-99 To: From: Date: Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members Michael P, Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator April 15, 1999 Subject: #2480 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Preliminary Plat List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Preliminary Plat Drawings E - Excerpt from CUP Resolution No. 3902 F - Subdivision Code Section 11.40 - Road Dedication and Reservations G - C & F Easement Vacation Sketch ^ “ ,1^Easement Dedication Primary Reason for Plat Spring Hill Golf Club was issued a CUP in May 1997. One of the conditions of approval was that Spring Hill would formally grant Conservation and Flowage Easements to the City over the various wetlands and drainageways on the property. It was determined that this could be most effectively done after the approved wetland alterations and drainageway reroutings were completed, to ensure accurate legal descriptions. Due to the sheer number of wetlands and drainageways, and the complexity of their descriptions. Spring Hill has chosen to dedicate these easement areas on a plat, which staff agrees is superior to multiple pages of lengthy legal descriptions. The request also includes the vacation of two pre-existing conservation and flowage easements which will be replaced by larger easements. The two being vacated are just north of Spring Hill Road and slightly west of the intersection of Spring Hill and East Long Lake Road (see Exhibit G). Two Outlets Proposed At the time the application was submitted it was determined that the original preliminary plat drawings did not include a portion of the property located south of Spring Hill Road west of East Long Lake Road. This portion is part of a tax parcel located north of Spring Hill Road, and therefore will become part of the plat. This area and one other portion of the site that is north of County Road 6 and just west of Hunter Drive, will be platted as outlots. The revised preliminary plat drawings incorporate Outlot B (see Exhibit D). #2480 - Spring Hill - Prelim. Plat April 15, 1999 Page 2 As outlets, these disconnected parcels will be assigned separate PINS numbers, and it will then be possible for the Club to sell them to adjacent property owners should the Club choose to do so. Neither outlet is buildable, and the final plat approval resolution will clearly identify this fact. Portion of Lot 1, Block 1 in Medina The northern half of Lot 1, Block 1, is in Medina. The applicant is advised to contact Medina to determine whether separate plat approval action by the Medina City Council is required. Right-Of-Way Widths Coujitv Road 6 Because the property abuts County Road 6, Hennepin County has been advised of this application and has been requested to comment on it. Staff anticipates a County request for additional right-of way. This stretch of County Road 6 is designated on the Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan as a "Bikeway", which under the County plan could require a total of 100' of right-of-way where only 80' now exists. Orono's 1980 Comprehensive Plan defines County Road 6 as a 'minor arterial' roadway requiring a minimum right-of-way width of 80 ’. Dave Zetterstrom of Hennepin County has verbally indicated the County will formally request an additional 10' on either side of County Road 6. City policy prior to approximately 1980 was to honor such requests, as evidenced by a number of plats that occurred in the 1970's. However, during the 1980's and 1990's the City generally only approved the County's additional right-of-way requests when they were in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan minimums, or where planned County Road improvements were pending that required added right-of-way. The City's apparent policy was to not burden our property owners %vith uncompensated loss of land to right-of-ways that weren’t clearly needed. The 1997 Hennepin County Bikeway Plan established a policy that requires 100% City funding of right-of-way acquisitions when the right-of-way initially requested by the County during plat review was declined by the City. Otherwise, the right-of-way funding formula is 50% City, 50% County. Orono Subdivision Code Section 11.40 Subd. 2 states: "...when the Comprehensive Municipal Plan or some other agency indicates plans for realignment or widening a road that would require use of some of the land in the subdivision, the subdivider shall be required to improve and dedicate at his expense such areas for widening or realignment of such roads...." #2480 - Spring Hill - Prelim. Plat April 15, 1999 Page 3 Whether added right-of-way for future bikeways falls within the definition of "widening or realignment of roads" is unclear. The City should review its right-of-way policy regarding subdivisions abutting a designated County bikeway route. City Roads The plat drawings submitted do not show the actual paved/traveled surface of Spring Hill Road, but the earlier site plans reviewed during the CUP process suggested that the road is more or less centered within its 66'+ right-of-way. The dedications for Spring Hill Road, Tamarack Drive and Hunter Drive appear to be appopriate subject to final acceptance by the Public Services Director and City Engineer. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed plat subject to: 1.Creation of Outlots A and B as unbuildable property outside the intended Club boundaries; ownership of such outlots may be transferred only to an owner of adjacent land and only when legally combined with that adjacent land. 2.Dedication of rights-of-way for Spring Hill Road, Tamarack Drive and Hunter Drive as shown, subject to confirmation by Public Services Director and City Engineer that no other City right-of-ways are needed to accomodate existing City roads. 3.Submittal of a revised plat drawing prior to Council review, showing the wetland on Outlot B (wetland boundary scheduled to be surveyed April 20). 4.Request Council direction as to County request for additional right-of-way along County Road 6 portions of the plat. 5.Execution of a conservation and flowage easement over all wetlands shown on the plat, and vacation of the existing easements at the south end of the site. Options for Action 1. 2. 3. 4. Reconunend approval per staff recommendation. Table for further information (specify). Recommend denial (state reasons). Other. 1 • A Application If 0 Date Received _ Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address __________ Property Identification Number (PIP) ^ Please check one - Property ____abstract or ____torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT _ Name Address OOkIT^ IZoP^ C City^g^tiO__________________ Phone (home)/oiz-4675"* ZipSSST/ Phone (work) OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Address City__Zip Phone (home) Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total.. »11 parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______ PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes _________ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) _________ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites _________Existing Units _________New Units Total Units ■AJ Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per ___Acres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) 4 MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Pqonent of fees (refer to "application fees” listed below. 2. Completed application form. 3. Preliminary plat information on Certificate of Survey. 4. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350 ’ (you must obtain this list fiom Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 5. As an addendum to this application, please attach a ^arate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Zoning OfBcial's Signature______________________________________Date MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FINAL APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (refer to Preluninaiy Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. . . ' 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit Zoning Ofhcial's Signature______________________________________Date______ L APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check [X] those which apply) A. Application Base Fees: _____ Sketch Plan Review (Class I, n & ni) $250.(X) ' • • ’ Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement S350.00 Subdivision Applicadon (Class I & II) S3S0.00 Preluninaiy Subdivision Application $375.00 + S25.00/lot (Class III & all non-residential) Final Plat ^plication (Class m) S200.00 Legal Review and Filing: _____Subdivision only S7S.(X) _____Subdivision w/easements and covenants min. $200.00 Isials _____ Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) _____ I.^gal and Engineering Review Fees (as mcuned) _____ Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application $200.(X) (No change firom original application) _____ Renewal of Class HI, Preliminary Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change fi'om original application) _____ Renewal of Final Class III Subdivision Application $I 50.00 (No change firom original application) B. Special Improvement Fees: Proposed Private Roads $600.00 + $.S0/lineal ft;_____lin. ft. x .50 = $_____ Proposed Public Roads $900.00 + $.50/lineal ft;_____lin. ft. x .50 « $_____ Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $900.00 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.(X) + $25/stub Proposed Watermain Extension $250.00 + $25/stub Prc^x)sed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) $200.00 On-Site S3rstem, Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rvual subu. «ision applications) $50.00/per lot x _____new lots C. Flexible Application Fees/Misc. Fees _____ Variance $220.(X) ($50.(X) per each additional variance) _____ Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision $100.00 _____ PRD Application with Subdivision $30.(X)/Dwelling Unit The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Coi^i)^^^^aiy to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. ^plicant's Signature _____ ______ Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City Ofihee 25 days before the Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Ofihee of this change prior to the meeting. A t •• M Cl\ tj ' a 15 L » 1 • ' ^i C*u. -_—'-irtjjggfl *i •H 1 -- -0-. « 1 M __ _ _ ]Lr-'-TT ■— • 0 t 9 9 0 • 9 9 0^9 9 0 • 9 9 9 9 0 » 9 •• 9 9 9 9 ^ • 9 9 9 § 9 9 9 • ••«••«•• ^tefessa. <vX1 a a a a a a a a * • •a**as» aaaa*B*a,v.*.*.v.va B a • a a a a ■ a a a • a a a a a a • a a •a a a * • a a a 9 9 0 9 0 0 0 . a a a a a a •x-ya B a » a a < ■ • • a a a < •.•.w *a*a*a*a* aaaaaa**a«aBaa#a aaaa*aaa m999»M00 09909999aaaaaaat 0000009 y::x;- 1 a a a a * a a a a a a a a X-ya a*Byy.‘ 0 < 0 ■ ^ • • • x-xv» a a a a a a • a 1»:-x 9 W 9 9 t ■ a a a a » a a a a a a a a 1 :W::x¥i> aaaaaaaa ■ a a a a a a • 4 9 9 9 9 9 0 9 * 09999099 • 9 0 9 9 * 9 9 9 9 0 0 9 0 0 90900990 aa***aaa 09000909 'wV.'-'.-X > a a a a a * a a a a a a * » a a a a a a \ m 9 9 :<•:< ■ 0 0 9 « a a 4 •>X'*.- 9 9 9 0 0 9 9 0 9 0 9 9 0 0 9 0 9 9m m m m m 0090009* 09099999 090*9990 00090099 aaaaaa* a ^^^^^^0 • 0 ( 9 9 •*B^»***a*«*» X'XXX-:- • •••«•■•••••••• 0999B99990*9m m m M m m r — — — — ■ - ' ■ ■ • • ■ • • • • • • • :■:■>: a***^*****^^**9^9^^^ mm»m99999990 ^_\Jfm^^9 9 0 0 9 0 0 9 B B • • a » ^ ^ • A a a B • B a B b b b a a a • ■::*::::vxx-x-x-;• ••BbBBB a a ^ • a a a a a aaa*a«B«aa«Ba« a^aa«aBaaaa*a aaaaaaaa*««aaa ia«aaaaBaiaaa*a « > aaBBaaBBaaBa aBBaaaaa*taaaa«a iaaa«aaBBaa«aB.a«aaBaaaaaaBaaa<BaBBBB9aB*«aB« ^B^B^B BBBBaBtfBBa^a »«MBas«BBB«BBB rV^ « BBBrass«BBBB< 90m999099mmm9 9999099'999999 *9 B B •BBBBBaaaaaa»a«aaa«aaBi aBBB%BaBB«BBB AaaB*aBBBBa«B »bbb a b B b b B ^a a B a BB«aBBaflBaB#< aaBBBBBBBBBBa aaaaaaBBaa kaVBaB«aBBBaa* ataaBBa«aa a a a a a a a Ml 9 9 9 B a a a 9mm a a a a.*.v. aBaaaaa.aaBaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aBBvaaBavaBBBasaa B B fe B ■ « ■■aaaBBaaBB a* *a*a a*a*^a*B*a*a"a*a*a*a*a* 9 9 9- 999999 9^ 999999 99999999999999999 "a"B"«*B*B*B^^ b*B%"b"b^ a"B*a*B*B BBPaBBBB BBBBSaaa aaaaBaarBBBBBaaaB aaaaaBB%aaaaaBaa% BBBaaaaaaaa«aaBaB aaaBaaaaaBBBaBBatf a#*a*»*a*«aaaaa t_• • 4.* * * * • * • ^ i •••••••aaaaaa#-a*a#a*#a Baa%> aaBBtaBaa aH 9 m * 9 mm aaBa«aaaaa« laaaaBaaaaaaaaaBaBaBaaaa. 999909999099909 ~a a < a a 0BBaaavaaaaaaB«8ajiaaaaaaBa«BBaBaBM Lb a a a a^ a B a a w m 0 0 9 9 9 i a^ aaBBaBaaBsaB \ 9 0 9 a a aaa«raaaBBBB«aiaaX aa« taBaaaav»a»aa« a a a aaaaaa #aaaa« aaaaBaaBBaBaaaaBaaaaaa^ > • .a%*»*a»Ba«*a»a*«**t «««aa« iaaaaBaa«a%a»%»***»a** w^i ■ aaaaaaaaaa«<«#a**> ^taaaaaa^aaaaaaaaaaatfaa^tak* aaBaaaaaaaaa i%aaa«aaaaaaaaa faaaaBaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa • aBa8BaaaaBa< aaaaaaaBaaaaaB< •aaaaaa«aaa«aaaaaaaa 1 1 aa«BaaaB«a aaBaBBaaBaBaa^a laaaaaaaaaaaBBaBBaaaB aaBBa*«.ai aBaaaaaaaaaaafl« aaBaaBBB«BaBaaa.B«BtfB — ■ 9 9 9 • a at 090999999099009 09m999999mm0994^*9999k LZ!^^i^Mgr^^,a-_B a • a^ I a«aaa8aBaaaaaa«^aaaaaBa#r«aaaBBBaaa7 a4a^aaaaaaB«aaaaa*paaaBaaaaB8aaaaBaaBa/ ■:•:•:• a a a a^ a a a a a « a ,a a a ■ ■ . i ■, aaaaaaaaaaBaaaa#Ba8* W m a I i ^aaaaaaaaaas • a aaaaaa m^w a la a a a a - * J- aaaaaBaaaaBaaaaaaaaaaaafaaaaaaaBaaaa • • 0 % ' aa«aaaaaaaaaa«aaa « aaaa.BB.«^**»a*«**a*•.•.•.v.v.y.V,'. aaaaaaacaaaaaaaaaa 99999%\9909999999 aaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaa*aaaaaaaaaaa t* a a* a'a^a*#* a*a*a * a* a* a*a*a*B*-B* «*a*a* a* a * a^a * a* _a%aaaaaaaaaaa 009 ^•aaaaaaa • J9 9r-r*,- a-r^a-r; ^ a a a a.svv a a a a>xx-a a a a a a a • 2f*«00^ 9 9 0 9 9 9 0 a a 9 9 • 0 9 0 % 9 9 • a«aa a aaaaaa* • aaaaar aaaaaataaaa 00009 *aaaa<aaaaa«aa«aro:-x<-yx*:-x-x \ ^ a a a • a a a a a a a*a*a^a^a^a*a a C : aaaaaaaaaaaaa '.•••a-.-a*a\VaW-Vaaaaai aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaa LaaaaaaaBaaaaaaaaaa09990y^m00090999m9990099 aaaaaa ^aaaaaaaaaaaaBBaaaa. aaa%»« aa»a%««a b « 999*099 mj 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 a % « • a B « 999*099 9.aaaa«a#aaaaaaaa/ aaaaaaaa ■_•_•_« • • aaaaaaaaa • 000 99 a a a •H=^: • N ^0 V»-«' r »».aa«<wa«a-.4--a s Ki r\j Ma. • ui § < CKe Sil V KI X SJ ps iH Ml ti §s (/Iss M M O Q Ui UJ KI UI lA UI • S»sjS5n«s»K)S s o a. UI UI r-4 </| Ife U. H in 0.H ^ in UI UI KI < ^ M H S Ki H KI UI P KI X S P _ UI P isiH I 3 m p ~ X < So u S p > SS p SS^S^ nsM CM KI CM — ^ P X H5 UI iH ______HP"idgi^a KI UI H P HvgSS** S5®“SSH X*2^ M iH KI UI e ^ Ik O < M ri KI m KI P P ^ t t ^ UI UI H 2~a:ii§i• n n H -J ■M i flL POP X P UI X H P « > P P «l P < P M x BS x V&liSoc « M X •H p P W M X r xs£2{ S P P X p _ o p o«S*iSSi p e X X H .j P o o Q pis p CM S“ !:S X p » p p i H P < XExiis • - ^•H H F- Cl r< I P X CM P P X P X P X X X P H -I P P P H «i § III M X PH M iH P O X X H X P o X X “SS-^ p if S 8 » p o 8 P X P CM P X M I"I P P o PM P i -'oS* CM M P ^ M » X O H O M S M P P I ~Sss UPOM O* PM XX P P ^ P -I P P O O ^ PJ5S»»«• s s **s< asgi*»5 slaS M HI si jg^«•-I o I “9 UI X 8 < X oS*5«5 . 5 5r > SS83SS K X III s M • UJsg s III lAJ 3 ss mi -Ju u o S </) !j !j i2 8 8 K> in lA ^ X X M CM s!S!S»S o £ C o <o Si U) N S M ^ M S K CM M n I ae « Q. A. iH (/) <Lg -> O IH K 9^m lA •J lA lO lA 9^ S3 r S < < A. H ^ 1-4 > isSss 0 2 U U O M 5 K 9 H Ik I&. 9) r4 lA ^ ^ «J lA ^ Q Q -J ^8lg®®g 1 O «J ^ CO O «J ^ P z ^ < M M z z H Z Z M 91 M M N O Z Z tt» >c e 0. a. e < 9) o p p z MI M K P P O lA O Z ^ O < UJ Ul lA e Z Ui P 9> N S ae u) -8,8“ iVJil ^iissi « • n P r-l -J z iH Q Z »A _ CM «l I mi iH Z H *1si|i|s ii,..a* anhPN a"-______<UI UI H z IS p p 3M H H P M Is isZ UI si g Z 3 M CM P Z Z SS32 3 M p p s sp R 3 3 p o z z z z p H p ^ p• guugs; CM U. Z Pc p ^ ^ *i mc^ 6 S CA P UI P P H CM Z X I H •H I ss|i p p p £ 2 sS££S$ P P P P K Z Z P M Z >> Z Z P P Z H Z sSgiss -I.JPZ PZZM MHZZ MPZ Z X XM H mui _ oLU t9 P g g P Z U U Q M 5 Z 9 P Z Z P P P ^ .J aJ P P P Q ^ P P Z P P M CM Z X I C3 mi mJ m a mi mi OXa^ggg* zz M M CM P SS p p «l u p z 8 8 ^«85! Z Z P u -i P p CM I i ~sSI*5S 1 mi mJ<< P Z Z H ^ CM CM < <Z X X CM P 1 P CM PZaEcas P P P K X aiS^iSsi o z z o >Jgu P P ^p p22SS?8S e B g « g V V ^ ^ o ^ P P P P N X ••ggS3 Z P S^ggl* csss X Mzz iz r9 V P X P s P a < ~3is:S P P Z Z 1-4 < P P Z Z 1-1 Z S 1Z 8K%1 III oz 3 Mssss o < ^ «J •S'^“8g CM Z Z P P P ^ *4 «J P _PQp.JP P Z P P M CM Z X * Q mi mi p S «j ^ p z M < M M Z X P X X M «a*8 “i a:SS Q Z Z < 5 > V Hi s o Ss*as p ^ p 8 p iESSs, M P < Z M X •H X Z U P z < M P h* Z H U 9 M -I P Z Z «l 9> M P P “a ,~5 O Q I-I X CM H P ^ •-4 Z > Z £ O Q < Z O Q X Z < 3 ► X III P z ss P aJ U U P M M z 9 P X Z Z Phm“ m ^ mi mi ox M P H M Z X H X X Mz <P P P z z '"55S*‘a P Z Z P > R 8 8i p N X §a z o z < > Xz P Z H- iaS o. M X Z Z 9 CM Z 5 P as “|g I Z P X S»S82* i in in 15s: H M oe |l*^2 »gS5 Z Z K X Z «i« > Xz II e z P Q P r4 P CM I s: * E — CCC!3 P 1-4 Z P O P P P P P «J P Hr t P O Z H CM CM Z Z Sz 3 > X M • III S < £Ul r iSi M OB ^ U ^CM < ^ Ul U « S ^ 3 2ntn*a ^ X S•z2 h ^n S5S25i K CM O g^ «“S isisiSlO CM .J Ul III I -J Ui UJ ^ _ SS-'-^Si ^ hh5 h CM m X x ^ < Ul Ul m N K >aiSSr4 X HI X S UJ < i “FoP X «JI X X X S W X iS Ul X is gg X X X in U Ul o X m ^ o to X CM < I r X H iH I CM m 2:11 »<|3i X X X H .J CM to XI tt: X into e® »»|| pM p4 X X Ul H <ij X pM O 5 X o X X n *S p4 ^ isi X in to m X in to X i { X •M H -0 -t pM i HI 10 N ^ X X to X X X Ci p4 U un X os Ul V N, r1o m ro Ooo CM CM O CO C3^ Z u t- 2 CO CM Q z a: CO o m -j I— -J in »-4 o CO —I 3: UJ z •-< mi 2 o H cx) ooo :x z f-H z o z z o •—I H-< a: cc a: o. H- UJ CO <x •—I O M 0^3: UJ tn >- 00 uo q: VO CO r^u. u. 3 QCO VO Q- h- CO CO CO 5S5P u o H Z Mss**- sc*-Ul Ik ■I 4. 11. 111. CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL no._8902_ attached hereto as Exhibit B-12. Use of Best Management Practices for erosion control during construction, including but not limited to use of silt fencing and erosion control blankets where slopes exceed 3:1. Any retaining w'alls exceeding 4' in height must have an engineered design, which shall be approved prior to issuance of the site grading permit. 11. C. WETLAND ALTERATIONS. Wetland alterations are approved as shown in attached Exhibits B6 through B-12, subject to the required buffer widths as shown in said Exhibit, and subject to the following conditions: i. Use of Best Management Practices for erosion control during construction. . Wetland mitigation is subject to approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as Orono's LGU for administration of the Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland alterations are also subject to Corps of Engineers Section 404 Clean Watei Act requirements. Conservation and Flowage Easements shall be granted to the City over all City-protected wetlands (as modified). Applicant shall grant to the City a Conservation and Flowage Easement over the wetland portion of the Club-owned property on the south side of Spring Hill Road west_ofEastjLongjLjke^oa^ # 4 111. IV. V. FOREST IMPACT MINIMIZATION. Minimization of impacts to the Big Woods portion of the property, as well as to other forested areas of the property, shall adhere to the following general requirements: • • A. Wetland buffers shall be maximized to the greatest extent possible in forest areas to protect the wildlife habitat value of the site and maintain the cormectivity between the wetland and forest conununities. B. Runoff or accidental application of fertilizers to forest and wetland areas shall be avoided. Final landscaping and grading plans shall be designed subject to City approval, where not limited by topography of the site, to divert runoff from these areas to the Page 9 of 17 S 11.40 SEC. 11.40. ROAD DEDICATION AND RESERVATIONS Subd. 1. New Perimeter Streets. Street systems in new subdivisions shall be laid out so as to eliminate or avoid new perimeter half-streets. Where an existing half-street is adjacent to a new subdivision, the other half of the street shall be improved and dedicated by the subdivider. The City may authorize a new perimeter street where the subdivider improves and dedicates the entlLe required street right-of-way width within his own subdivision boundaries. Subd. r. Widening and Realignment of Existing Roads. Where a subdivision borders an existing narrow road or when the Comprehensive Municipal Plan or some other agency indicates plans for realignment or widening a road that would require use of some of the land in the subdivision, the subdivider shall be required to improve and dedicate at his expense such areas for widening or realignment of such roads. Such frontage roads and streets shall be improved and dedicated by the subdivider at his own expense to the full width as required by this Chapter. Subd. 3. Land reserved for any road purposes may not be counted in satisfying yard or area requirements of the Zoning Chapter whether the land is to be dedicated to the City in fee simple or an easement is granted to the City. i I mmrn • <s V2.(£-\6>fiil- f < i<^S .. ► ov.v?.v^t.%- GOVT LOT 3 0^s -MriMr -- <-*r Application Date: 3-25-99 Application Complete Date: 4-1-99 60-Day Action Deadline Date: 6-1-99 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 1 0 1999 Cl 11 Ohunujvu REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: April 20,1999 Item No.: ^ Department Approval:Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gatfron Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2481 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Rezoning - Ordinance Adoption List of Exhibits A - Ordinance for Adoption L - Memo and Exhibits of April 14,1999 Background The site of the Spring Hill Golf Club was first zoned in 1950 for single family residential (SFR) use as part of the North Orono Zoning District. In 1955 this was superceded by establishjnent of the Northeast Orono District, an SFR district requiring 1-acre minimum lot area. This area was rezoned in 1967 to R-IA SFR requiring 2-acre minimum lot area. In 1975 the 2-acre zoning district designation was revised to RR-IB Rural Residential and the portion of this site in Section 25 was rezoned RR-lB-1, an RR-IB subdistrict that allows non-profit "study and research centers" as an additional permitted use. There are no other properties in Orono zoned RR-1B-1. Because the portion of property zoned RR-lB-1 will no longer contain facilities for a "study and research center". Council required in Condition 1 of Resolution No. 3902, that Spring Hill Golf Club 'ipply for rezoning of this property back to the underlying RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential District, thereby eliminating the future possibility of a "study and research center" use. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 19,1999. No public comments were forthcoming. Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the rezoning. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning from RR-lB-1 to RR-IB. • i Spring Hill Golf Club - Rezoning April 20, Page 2 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached zoning ordinance to rezone a portion of the Spring Hill Golf Club from RR-1B-1 to RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential District. ■ Vfc ) i ORDINANCE NO.___, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORONO BY LISTING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN THE CITY AS REZONED FROM RR-lB-1 TO RR-IB 'ihe City Council of the City of Orono ordains: SECTION 1. The Municipal Code of Orono is hereby amended by amending the official zoning map and zoning use district boundaries for property legally described as follows: TTie following property in the South 1/2 of Section 25, Township 118, Range 23: Bounded on the North by 6th Avenue North, on the East and South by Spring Hill Road and Hunter Drive extended, and on the West by the West line of Section 25, Township 118, Range 23. Said property is hereby rezoned from RR-lB-1, One Family Rural Residential Subdistrict to RR-IB, One Family Rural Residential District. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be published in THE LAKER/PIONEER newspaper and shall be effective upon publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at its regular meeting held the 10th day of May, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 1 of 1 . t 4 Application Date: 3-25-99 Application Complete Date: 4-1-99 60-Day Action Deadiine Date: 6-1-99 To: From: Date: Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator April 14, 1999 Subject: #2481 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Rezoning List of Exhibits A - Application & Letter of Request B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Zoning Map E - Legal Description of Area to be Rezoned F - RR-lB-1 Zoning District Standards Background The site of the proposed Spring Hill Golf Club was first zoned in 1950 for single family residential (SFR) use as part of the North Orono Zoning District. In 1955 this was superceded by establishment of the Northeast Orono District, an SFR district requiring 1-acre minimum lot area. This area was rezoned in 1967 to R-1A SFR requiring 2-acre minimum lot area. In 1975 the 2-acre zoning district designation was revised to RR-IB Rural Residential and the portion of tliis site in Section 25 was rezoned RR-lB-1, an RR-IB subdistrict that allows non-profit "study and research centers" as an additional permitted use. There are no other properties in orono zoned RR-1B-1. Because the portion of property zoned RR-1 B-1 will no longer contain facilities for a "study and research center". Council requir^ in Condition 1 of Resolution No. 3902, that Spring Hill Golf Club apply for rezoning of this property back to the underlying RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential District, thereby eliminating the future possibility of a "study and research center" use. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning from RR-1 B-1 to RR-IB. Options for Action 1. 2. 3. 4. Recommend approval Table for further information Deny (state reasons) Other /I AppUcation # Date Received~V/^ ~ Amount Paid f'h^Oey CITV OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address "7ZS* K-| Type of Application to be Filed Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) APPLICi^T |4iU^ Name^ JTwv^ \oVVi-^^goM__________ Address Phone (home) 4^7^ _____ Phone (work) 1 7^— OT>74- City _______Zip OWNER 0^ different than applicant) Name ______________ Phone (home). Phone (work). Address City Zip. Date Property Acquired I "9*7 (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _____$ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application >C $175.00 Residential Accessory Use $250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ____$200,00 Duplex Credit/Bldg ____$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use ____$250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining wdls within 75' of lakeshore r*':rii PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee ' 7-\ i . / '0 OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision /?■ ^ $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ___$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ___$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule i REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form. __Describe request in detail. __Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350', labels and plat mjip (you must obtain this list, labels and map fi-om Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). __Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. __ Attach legal description to application if not included oh required survey. __Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). • . __List of the legal names (include maiital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would iriclude name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). __Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). • As' an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. * • • • .. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCTJMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11 ” X 17 ” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applic^i and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:__________' Date A. .2. X 4. • • 5. •6. ' 7. 8. 9. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and co.-^ect to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City stafl^ consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commis.«'on Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Builtling & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. SPRING HILL GOLF CLLIK March 25, 1999 CityofOrono Miice Gaffron 2750 Kelly Parkway Crystal Bay. MN 55323 E)earMike, The enclosed is an application to rezone the Spring Hill property from RR-lB-1 to RR-IB so as to fulfill our Conditional Use Permit, resolution #3902. All required submittals arc enclosed or have alreach’ been submitted during the permitting process or in the replatting process. In addition to the rezoning, Spiing Hill has been instructed to amend our conditional use permit for a misunderstanding that the existing cottage as shown on plan will be used as a securit>/caretaker cottage. Spring Hill Golf Club had always planned to reuse the cottage is some manner. Ho\ve\ er, Orono Staff assumed the building was going to be removed with all other demolition processes on site. This building will house employees of the Golf Club for securit}’ purposes as well as Clubhouse duties. There w ill be no changes to the building other than new paint and a permitted connection to the clubhouse septic s>stem. Let me know if I can provide any other information for you. Sincerelv / Johnson roject Manager r ..-y ‘ » •A " .1 ) 700 Spring Hill Road - Wayzata, MN 55391 iU I • i I ' I. 'I •I ri .• • ,.n C‘cr-f' - • -»/i f i •• ' 1~ tifl Vi* A’.V.- v’.*X‘‘ /.V.*., « a » ■ , pi ’.V.V;*v.;. k a a « « P:^ a a • a « a a a •:W! t .V,*.*<aaB«aa«*aa a a a • a «• tavavsa laaa^aai aaa 09»00Mm90j099^» •990 >aa«aa4^ ««aaaa aaa ■y.<y.->^‘: ;v;-:-x-;;-:-^aaaaavav a 1 a a a a T* ■ • • aaaaaaaaaaAaa^aaaa*a^aaaa^a • v • a a immM::im f*««aa<««aa<a««aa 0 9 9 9 9 9 0 aaaaaa<a«| *v^ a a • a M a « a^ • a a r a a a C aWaaa%aa<"aaa< «vaaaaaa^aa* aa^aaa«€a«a< AVVSVV.SV.*- ' •••9900009900- • 9 m • 0 9 -*V ■ aaaa«« •aaa* «a>a^a* aaaa**aaaa« *aaaaaa« a«a«aa««aaaa • aataVavaaaa tSiy^x-;- > v#r •: y -T-a • >•««» * * » • ■ « ■ « » .aaaaaaa*#>aaa >aaa • a r < a 9 m • a a^^T* aJ 0999^ 9 9 99 0 im tui • «••• • 9 r 0 w • # a »•• a^aaavaaaaaaa aaa aaa**tfaaaa a a a • a a c a ^ . - . iip?gs:g a a ^ a a V a *J^a aaa* |A a a * a a a *, - _ - ^ I ‘ aaa a a • a a a a a a a a a • a j * / a a a C i a a "n '"^ 1 • a a a a a a a ^■r a a a « a • • ^/• a • aN a a I i II ' ^ « - a • • a ■ a c • a a a afaavaaaaa a T a , ^ a a * a a a a a a a f» 4 m 9 a a a a «_•_• • • * * • • a • /•\ M.% r « • ■* 1 'o .-J ;•* ^ ■ Sm, 1) . *1 .. :) M o toro H H o >T in 10 N Ha. • ui S UJoe If S '!rr 'C 1 i . t . / / I u*. %• ' »• «\ rl ■ or.v:JCA O O t/l (/) ggM M 0^ DC OC O Q UJ UJ ?|g2 sig; I M S s r-i O' K)mm •J in UJ Ui ro _ H lO O o m o ^ in > •o < m ^ a: UJuzUJa. </) UJ Z H ^ > UI UJ M<OH to z G z CM H Z <I X in z CO MH in in •• I M> CM in c« lO _ _ fH Z in CO om o UI UJ i a in z »o m •J m a s* M UJ „3 Si Z ^ Q0 O ^ *§ f-l z^ g fO o CM ^ 1 «J « M iH Z rH I nD CM in rM CO r-i W O Z UJo UJ Dz X X z a ^ Z Z 9^ UJ < X K) (9 in Q in UJ b o in D in z Z CQ^-iz X U -J z ** S in J5 u u > M iH < Z Z »H Z K- 52in sHI Hisa. oz s iii yjo <a. a iH CM u. u. Hi « I/I «j «j ^ I/I Q P -MAin ui o O M CM ae a* a« c I/I I/I z s§ Hi Ik U. Kl ^ i/i -j .j ^ in in Q p ^ m m lij 5 o M CM oc X I Q «J .J _ « a ^ .j p 2 iH < M M X S »H X X M ^ ^ P P ^ H*"855*" ;5 e X X o >• in e Si I/I ? X ^LLff $ . V3 7 > ■ • • ; ct^.a s\ •V., V S§ sSss e < .j «j0 g u U iH Ik Ik iH I/I ^ ^moolO UJ o p CM X 1 o ^ ^ CO o -I ^ r-l < M M r-l XX in p p •O P X X K) M M e X X « o X X 10 o I/I m a i-i X O' Kl «j m -I in M M X X I/I o N. > < X iH a o Xo Hi SSiiiS X H K o m • • • • RR-lB-1 SINGLE FAMILY 2 ACRE UNSEWERED The following property in the South 1/2 of Section 25/ Township 118, Range 23: Bounded on the North by 6th Avenue • North, on the East and South by Spring Hill Road and Hunter Drive extended, and on the West by the West line of Section 25, Township 118, Range 23.. ‘ . . • •• • • •• •• #• •■p § 10.29 SEC. 10.29. RR-lB-1 ONE FAMILY RURAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT. Subd. 1. Permitted Uses, Conditional Uses, Accessory Uses. Any use as regulated in the "RR-IB" District. Subd. 2. Additional Permitted Use. Study and research centers owned or operated by one or more non-profit charitable, scientific or educational organizations, provided that no building other than a residence shall be located within 100 feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District. Subd. 3. Open Space. Not more than 15% of land devoted to use as a study and research center shall be occupied by structures or buildings without a conditional use permit allowing a greater percentage of such land use. Any application for zoning of land as an "RR-IB-I" One Family Rural Residential Subdistrict shall be accompanied by a map or plan showing the portion of land within the district that may be occupied by structures or buildings shall become a part of the conditions upon which such zoning is approved, and no structure or building may be located outside of such portion without a conditional use permit allowing the same. Subd. 4. Height. No structure or building in a study and research center shall exceed thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. Subd. 5. Temporary or Permanent Residents. No study and research center shall at any time serve as a temporary or permanent residence for a number of persons in excess of that determined by multiplying by 2-1/2 the number of acres of land devoted to use as such study and research center without a special permit allowing a greater number of persons in such number and for such periods of time as the Council may deem appropriate, due consideration being given to the interests of health, safety and public welfare. Subd. 6. Use. No study and research center shall at any time permit more than 300 persons to be present by invitation upon its property, without a special permit allowing a greater number of persons in such number and for such periods of time as the Council may deem appropriate, due consideration being given to the interests of health, safety and public welfare. Subd. 7. Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements. (See Section 10.28, Subdivision 5.) ORONO CC 290-1 (4-1-84) Application Date: 3-25-99 Application Complete Date: 4-1-99 60-Day Action Deadline Date: 6-1-99REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval:Administrator Approval: rdlnator COUNCIL MEETINGMAY 1 0 1999 Date: May?, 1999 Item No.: Agenda Section: Zoning Name: Michael P. Gaffron Title: Senior Planning Coord Item Description: #2482 - Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Guest House CUP Resolution List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Draft Planning Commission Minutes 4-19-99 C - Memo and Exhibits of April 14, 1999 Background At the time of CUP application for the Golf Club, plans showed the existing Spring Hill caretaker house (the old farmhouse overlooking Spring Hill Road, and just southwest of the new clubhouse) likely to be removed, since it appeared to conflict with the 5th tee. It also was shown on those drawings in dashed lines, suggesting it was to be removed. As a result. Resolution No. 3902 listed all accessory buildings approved for the property and did not include the caretaker house or its two associated outbuildings (see Exhibit F of April 14 memo). In January 1998 the Club requested and was granted approval to construct an entirely new clubhouse rather than remodeling the old conference center. The location of the clubhouse did not change, and the new site plan did not extend westward far enough to inkle to staff that the caretaker house was intended to remain. In summer 1998 the Club was allowed to connect the caretaker house to the clubhouse septic system, the Building Department staff being unaware that it was not an 'approved' building. This came to my attention this winter when Club Manager Tim Ivory requested a separate address for the caretaker house. Condition 3 of Resolution No. 3902 requires an amendment of the CUP if additional accessory buildings are proposed. Because it will act as a 'guest house', the caretaker house also requires a Guest House CUP. Kifin rtHTIll rtinc^ nira raiiin •rniiTUtli [tinmoili ^itnniiiiiitMsi •Jilt] STOHlfTC Mii»f m\Ti MililHi r» K'va I t«f r« I LtlfirtliRlIIil raiM mm MilfJiMACtSnira mmm [WVt4 mum •■k*s r«iMtmr^f :W / Caretaker House CUP•r^rtinn ttliRTiltC mum SlllDKlm use as a "guest house" for members and non-paying guests. Considering that T the Club House had included a small number of rental suites for members to draw disfavor, ^ which were later dropped from the plan, staff is not )le use of the caretaker house as a guest unit for members and guests, and will determine whether future review should be required prior to conversion from it house use. pproval of the requested Guest House Cup on the condition that the caretaker mted out, nnd shall be occupied only by employee(s) of the Club, members approval being justified by the site security aspects of said occupancy. • include approval of an amendment to the original CUP to allow ' e caretaker ted outbuildings (2) to remain on the site. mary for Orono to not assign separate addresses for guest houses, there are a ;s in the City. Staff will assign an address of 735 Sixth Avenue North for the ieparate address is still preferred by Spring Hill, with the stipulation that both will be posted together at the entrance to the property, to avoid any possible :ncy vehicles. N REQUESTED attached resolution granting approval for caretaker house / guest house use of n the Spring Hill Golf Club property, and amending Resolution No. 3902 to and associated outbuildings to remain as accesssory structures on the Club A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 (G) AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 3902 -FILE #2482 WHEREAS, Spring Hill Golf Club (hereinafter "the applicant" or "the Club") is the owner of the property located at 725 Sixth Avenue North within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City ) and legally described as: Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 19, 1999, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G) to permit the use of an existing farmhouse on the property as a caretaker and guest house, and further to amend the CUP approval of Resolution No. 3902 to allow said structure and adjacent outbuildings to be retained on the Club property. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2482. 2. The property is located in the RR-lB-1 Zoning District, where 2 acres is the minimum lot area. The property consists of approximately 200 acres. Page 1 of 4 3.The Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 19, 1999 and recommended approval on a vote of 4-1. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The location of the proposed caretaker/guest house and the size of the property would allow a ftiture subdivision of the property to place the caretaker/guest house on a fully conforming lot, although that is neither proposed nor intended at this time. B. The caretaker/guest house will be used for the sole use of the employees, members and non-paying guests of Spring Hill Golf Club. C. The caretaker house aspect of the request provides a measure of security for the Club property by potentially housing an overnight person who is responsible for the site. D. Resolution No. 3902 should be amended to allow the farmhouse and its associated detached garage and adjacent shed to remain on the Club property in their current locations. E. The proposed use, whether it be for a caretaker or for members and non paying guests of the Club, will have no negative impacts on the surrounding neighborhood, and the small size of the building inherently limits the use as a residential dwelling unit to a level that is not inconsistent with the City's overall CUP approval for the Club. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the existing farmhouse to be used as a caretaker house/guest house will not be detrimental to 'he health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 4 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicants and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G) to permit the use of an existing farmhouse on the property as a caretaker and guest house, and further to amend the CUP approval of Resolution No. 3902 to allow said structure and adjacent outbuildings to be retained on the Club property, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. Resolution No. 3902, Condition 3 on Page 8 of 17, is hereby amended by allowing the farmhouse, detached garage and shed to remain on the Club property as allowed accessory structures. Use of the caretaker house/guest house as a dwelling unit shall be limited to Club employees, members and non-paying guests. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 4 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of May, 1999, ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of May, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 r ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 19,1999 (#2481 Spring Hill Golf Club, continued) ^ / I .fr/v* comm^d apiStoddard moved, Berg se'conded, to recommend abproval of Application #248(H, Spring H II Golf Club, 7; 15 Sixth Avenue North\ for tile rezoning oMhe portio^putUned In the A^ril 14,1999 Planner's Report from RR-1^1 to RR-4B,^ubject to the conditions contained in'the April 14, l’^1>lanher^s Report. \/pTE: Ayes 5,'Nays 0. ■J 14. #2482 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 8:43 p.m. - 8:57 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Tim Johnson, Spring Hill Golf Club Representative, was present. Gaffron stated at the time of the conditional use permit for the Golf Club, plans showed an existing Spring Hill caretaker house, which at the time was thought to be likely to be removed. The conditional use permit did not contain the appropriate language to allow the caretaker house to be retained. Condition three of Resolution No. 3902 requires an amendment to the conditional use permit If additional accessory buildings are proposed. Because it will act as a "guest house", the caretaker house also requires a Guest House Conditional Use Permit. Gaffron stated the property does meet the required setbacks and lot size requirements to allow the caretaker house to remain on the property. The Golf Club is proposing to utilize the caretaker house as a residence for one or more employees of the Club, which would appear to be covered under the dennition of a "guest House" In Section 10.20 Subdivision 3(G) as an accessory separate dwelling for the sole use of the occupants of the primary dwelling, including their domestic employees or their non-paying guests. City Staff is recommending approval of this application. Johnson stated this was an oversight on the part of the Golf Course and it has been their intent all along to retain the caretaker house. There were no public comments. Smith commented that to her understanding the caretaker house was to be removed after a period of time. Johnson stated there was a farmhouse originally on the property which was removed. The Golf Club does not Intend the caretaker house to be used overnight by its guests but will be occupied at this time by a caretaker. Gaffron stated that City Staff is recommending that the caretaker house not be rented out and shall be occupied only by employees of the Club. Stoddard commented that In his view the guest house only allows the structure to be occupied by family members or owners of the property. Gaffron remarked that the code reads non-paying guests. The City has provided for caretaker units at marina areas for security In the past, and City Staff is viewing this as the same situation. Smith commented she does not want to see this caretaker house be utilized as a hotel for Page 12 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 19,1999 (#2482 Spring Hilt Golf Club, continued) overnight guests of the golf club, Stoddard remarked that the City would not be in a position to regulate the use of the structure unless complaints are received. Schroeder stated the use of the structure is governed under Section 10.20, Subd. 3(G), which allows for domestic employees or their non-paying guests. Schroeder noted that this was a small structure and would not be able to house many occupants. Lindquist commented he does not have a problem with this application. Smith inquired whether the Planning Commission wanted to establish this structure as a guest house in the event that the golf course experiences more growth over the years. Johnson stated the Golf Club has provisions in its by-laws regulating the growth of the club, and that they are interested in providing some lodging for a caretaker. Smith stated she would like this issue to be revisited If the use of the caretaker house should change in the future. Gaffron stated the conditional use permit does give the City control over the use of the structure and requires the Applicant to come back if the use of the structure changes. Hawn commented from the audience that this house will not accommodate many guests. Stoddard stated in his view the standard language would be sufficient in this situation and that further restrictions are not necessary. Schroeder moved, Stoddard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2482, Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North, allowing a Guest House Conditional Use Permit as defined in Section 10.20, Subdivision 3(G), and further subject to the other conditions outlined in the April 14,1999 Planner's Report. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Smith Opposed. Smith stated she was opposed to this application because she would like to see the provision included which would require the Planning Commission to review the conditional use permit before the use of the structure is changed. (Hawn returns to the Planning Commission at 8:58 p.m.) * • 9. #2473 MATTHEW B. HERMAN, 3825 CHERRY AVENUE - VARIANCES, 9:00 p.m. - 9:08 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidvait of Publcation were noted. Matthew Herman. Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a variance to permit the construction of of 263* by 4' boardwalk across an undeveloped City right-of-way to connect a landlocked piece of property to his property, which is legally combined, with lakeshore rights. The proposed walkway would connect from the residence across a platted right-of-way, which will not be developed because it Paae 13 Application Date: 3-25-99 Application Complete Date: 4-1-99 60-Day Action Deadline Date: 6-1-99 To: From: Date: Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members Michael P. GafFron, Senior Planning Coordinator April 14, 1999 Subject: #2482 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Guest House CUP List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Ovviiers List D - Site Plans (Original and Proposed) E - Letter of Request F - Excerpt from Resolution No. 3902 Background At the time of CUP application for the Golf Club, plans showed the existing Spring Hill caretaker house (the old farmhouse overlooking Spring Hill Road, and just southwest of the new clubhouse) likely to be removed, since it appeared to conflict with the 5th tee. It also was shown on those drawings in dashed lines, suggesting it was to be removed. As a result, the language of Resolution No. 3902 listed all accessory buildings approved for the property and did not include the caretaker house or its two associated outbuildings (see Exhibit F). In January 1998 the Club requested and was granted approval to construct an entirely new clubhouse rather than remodeling the old conference center. The location of the clubhouse did not change, and the new site plan did not extend westward far enough to inkle to statf that the caretaker house was intended to remain. In summer 1998 the Club was allowed to connect the caretaker house to the clubhouse septic system, the Building Department staff being unaw are that it was not an 'approved' building. This came to my attention this winter when Club Manager Tim Ivory requested a separate address for the caretaker house. Condition 3 of Resolution No. 3902 requires an amendment of the CUP if additional accessory buildings are proposed. Because it will act as a 'guest house', the caretaker house also requires a Guest House CUP. #2482 - Spring Hill Caretaker House CUP April 14,1999 Page 2 Guest House CUP Standards Met The proposed use of the caretaker house as a residence for one or more employees of the Club would appear to be covered under the definition of a 'guest house' in Section 10.20 Subd. 3(G) as "an accessor}’ separate dwelling constructed on an existing undivided lot for the sole use of the occupants (of the primary dwelling), including their domestic employees or their non-paving guests". The standards established by code for such use are merely that "all regular lot requirements shall be met by the guest house". The City has in all past guest house applications defined this to mean that there must be adequate lot area and setbacks for the guest house to be split off as a separate conforming lot in the future. This is required to avoid a future need for variances as well as to limit the density of housing in our neighborhoods. The caretaker house and 2 small outbuildings are more than 100' from the clubhouse, so in the unlikely event that the property was further subdivided, the caretaker house could be on a separate lot. Note that the septic system serving the clubhouse and caretaker house is more than capable of handling the combined flows from both uses. Staff Recommendation In staffs opinion the establishment of a caretaker house for the Spring Hill Country Club is a positive measure from the standpoint of site security. The location of the caretaker house near the clubhouse is a suitable location and does not require new driveway access points nor does it detract from the long-established rural character of the site. Staff recommends approval of the requested Guest House Cup on the condition that the caretaker house may not be rented out, and shall be occupied only by employee(s) of the Club, approval being justified by the site security aspects of said occupancy. Any recommendation for approval should also include approval of an amendment to the original CUP to allow the caretaker house and its associated outbuildings (2) to remain on the site. Although it is customary for Orono to not assign separate addresses for guest houses, there are a number of precedents in the City. Staff will assign an address of 735 Sixth Avenue North for the caretaker house if a separate address is still preferred by Spring Hill, with the stipulation that both addresses (725-735) will be posted together at the entrance to the property, to avoid any possible confusion by emergency vehicles. #2482 - Spring Hill Caretaker House CUP April 14,1999 Page 3 Options for Action 1. Recommend approval per staff recommendation or with revised conditions. 2. Table for further information (specify). 3. Recommend denial (state reasons). 4. Other. 4 Application # Date Received . Amount Paid ck f/75 CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Type of Application to be Filed Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) - 7J?> APPLICANT Name^j7vA, ___________ Phone (home ) ~ 4^ 7^ _____ Phone (work) ^ 1 7^- City t?z£>hJir) ________Zip OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home). Phone (work) Address City Zip. Date Property Acquired (n~ 1~9"7 (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application SI75.00 Residential Accessory Use _____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _____$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use _____$250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore _____PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule _____$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) _____After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____S2O0.00 Easement Vacation _____$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _ $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule // ••1 ; f . - • J . 3 ■*». REQUIRED SUBMITTALS /I. 2. X 4. 5. 6. ■ 7. 8. 9. Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin C<^nty Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As' an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBM? TTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff: Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City stafl^ consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City oSices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 'r «« O in K) K) M Ob / ^ ■>;>/'* ' •.7*.r'*/» 4r •A Ho •o e <(. ‘^% • > • . 9 II o ' ■/ V \ l\ 1 \ / > / / // / ’ / . ^/ \ A A 1 1 ^ \ N. >RACT1CE GREI V \I *.K, \ \ / ^<2; A \ bb/\ I / ' \ \ / FREES ^VED # / )RIVING^ « \ PRACncE A Vs V / j,N. / / / \ V V 93bk / V >x-' &- % <C\ \ \ \ \\\\\v\^-|Mm A\\s»iai 2fvi f >”4 r%% \ ^B)\ N \ . V 'V Vs Vs / TREES' ^AVEB^ 'y y ^4mmm\ irBmavvBXBMM ^^^■lAr.BiuB.vaBMV.VJMBoraunM m^Krn^^MWdwmniu^fiLwmmmmmWaaSmKKflHBKBfiBLiBaanaKaaiJNVBKflnC P^ftjiriBi]BariBy0«af2rB0Arjnv]ingD ^<aiiaaa(jaBaaariaaaciRB»einAran ■PIVB IlfBBttBBnillVBB'BIliilBVkim^n\cm§M^m%nmmmmmMi§mwmmmmmwM'9|KBi:f iiflBJiinvBiriBBriiiBfliiABniBj v>: .^v::niiniiiiMiiiiiiByifinB0B ’i&i I^Vr1UULI7BaBI liar.8B9ILVBBBI m^Vlf BA.MWBBIliriBBBniniiBB^ ■BJltHIKBBBUiUflB MMflHBHIBBBt^BBli; xvA ii HBHIBBBw^BBKA UilBBB^DBBB^ llNI|l.lliJIAl.^K>j \fmwjI r y t!y y y ^y y y y\^ y^y y y ^ 'k^\/A iZ A [CBi I ) J % ^ F CITY of ORONO mi RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3902 _NO. weflands- and a varianca to Section 10.56 Subds. 16® & W to allovy "nt of fill Widun a bluff itnpact zone; and a Subds 19-21 to allow land alterations involving movement of ^PProxim ^ * through of material witlun the site; per the plans and specifications attached hereto as Exhibits B through B-16, subject to the following conditions; 1. 2. 3. Subdistrict from RR-lB-1 to RR-IB, One Family Rural Residential District. i LEGAL COMBINATION. Prior to January 1,1998, applic^t shall parcels comprising the property have been legally combine or execute and the County will not allow such combination for whatever reason, applicant shall ^ S^mey shall file on the chain of title a "Special Lot Combmation document ^ to said parcels shall remain in common ownership and may not be City approval. As an alternative to legal combination, applicant may plat the p p rty, may allow for a more efficient granting of easements. ______________ VARIANCES. A. OVERSIZE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, pe “riX accessed' struemre approved herein is the “'"“/““‘ICfromSt “cS^" “.-m tT* .te •'!=' u...d. .h.Mi»- 11. • • • 111. iv. Open storage bins located at the maintenance facility. Concession stand and rest station located near the tunnel. Any future additional acc^o^taildings proposed shall be subjecUo an am. Conditional Use Permit. — an amendment of this B. LAND* VEGETATION ALTERATIONS IN BLUp IMPACT ZONE. AU I areas 1. Page 8 of 17 € SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB March 25. 1999 City of Orono Mike Galfron 2750 Kelly Parkw-ay Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mike, The enclosed is an application to rezonc the Spring Hill property from RR-lB-1 to RR-IB so as to fulfill our Conditional Use Permit, resolution #3902. All required submittals are enclosed or ha\*e already been submitted during the permitting process or in the replatting process. In addition to the rezoning, Spring Hill has been instructed to amend our conditional use permit for a misunderstanding that the e.xisting cottage as shown on plan will be used as a secxuit>’/caretaker cottage. Spring Hill Golf Club had always planned to reuse the cottage is some maimer. How ever, Orono Staff assumed the building was going to be removed with all other demolition processes on site. This building will house employees of the Golf Club for securiw purposes as well as Clubhouse duties. There will be no changes to the building other than new paint and a permitted connection to the clubhouse septic s>stem. Let me know if I can provide any other information for you. Sincere!! im Johnson >ject Manager .J V •** • \ // P ------^' J ^ £j i. 00 Spring Hill Road - Wayzata, MN 55391 Application Date: 4/26/99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING MAY 1 0 1999 Cl rv OF UHoivu DATE: 5/7/99 ITEM NO.:g' Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2495 Bohland Development, Steven Bohl Final Plat of a Class III Subdivision Carriage Hill_________________ Zoning:RR-IB Comprehensive Plan: One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres, unsevvered) Rural Residential Application: Bohland Development has applied to the City for Final Subdivision approval of a six lot plat of "Carriage Hill" located between Brown Road South and Willow Drive South. The property to be subdivided is approximately 45 acres in size, much of which is designated wetland. The City Council reviewed, and approved the preliminary plat on April 12, 1999. Please see attached Resolution No. 4267. The subdivider is requesting the Council approve the name for Outlot C (Private Road) to be "Carriage Lane". STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the Final Plat of "Carriage Hill" subject to the conditions noted in the Final Plat Resolution. The applicant is advised the final plat shall not be filed until all the conditions in the final plat are met by the subdivider. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF CARRIAGE HILL FILE NO. 2495 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of the land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a six lot plat by Steven R. Bohl, Bohland Development, Inc. hereinafter ("the subdivider"); and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet the intent of the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District, finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed by granting lot vvidtli variances to Lots 3 and 4, where 200' is the minimum lot width requirement; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 4267. 2. 3. 4. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. Dedication to the City of flowage and conservation easements providing for limitations on the use of the wetlands described therein as shown on the plat as "drainage easement." Dedication to the City of right-of-way for Willow Drive South and Brown Road South. 5. Payment to the City of a park dedication fee of $29,400. 6. Payment to the City for the final plat legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $400.00. Page 1 of 4 7. The MCWD shall approve the Grading, Drainage and Street Construction Plans. 8. Conditional Use Permit granted for grading along the property line per Resolution No. 4268. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of , Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Submitted Letter of Credit for 150% of the site improvements based on the City Engineer's estimate. Only Lot 1 shall not have access to Outlot C, Carriage Lane. Lots 2,3,4,5 and 6 shall have access to Outlot C, Carriage Lane. Lots 2,3,4,5 and 6 shall not have access to Willow Drive or Bro\Mi Road South. A lot width variance is granted for Lots 3 and 4 which front on a cul-de-sac and which do not meet the required 200' width at the 50' setback. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Titles on or before November 10, 1999 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. The private Outlot C shall henceforth be known as Carriage Lane. The private road shall be privately owned and maintained per the appropriate access easement/maintenance documents to be executed by the subdivider. The subdividcr has created a homeowners association which shall be responsible for maintenance of Carriage Lane located in Outlot C. Outlot B shall be owned and maintained by the owner of Lot 2. The Outlot B shall serve as a private driveway for Lot 2. No other lots shall use said Outlot B for access. Page 2 of 4 9.Subdivider shall concurrent \vith road construction, construct stormwater management improvements generally as shown on the Preliminary Grading, Drainage and Street Construction Plan dated April 21, 1999 subject to any revisions of said plan as may be required by the City Engineer. TheTinal Grading, Drainage and Street Construction Plan must be approved by the City Engineer prior to release of Final Plat for filing. 10. The private road in Outlot C and required drainage and stormwater improvements shall be constructed to City requirements, subject to a Developers Agreement executed between the City and the developer, and subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 11 . No building permits will be issued until the private road base work, all improvements and septic sites protected by fencing material have been completed by the developer and approved by the City. 1 *> i Subdivider shall plant boulevard trees along the private road per the requirements of Section 1 1.60, Subdivision 2 and are subject to review by the City's landscaping consultant. 13. All identified primary and alternate sewage system drainfield sites within the subdivision shall be fenced off prior to any land alterations, and such fencing shall remain in place until such time that each Lot is developed. 14. The subdivider has proposed easements for monument signs located on Lots 5 and 6 adjacent to Outlot C. The subdividcr is advised a monument sign plan must be provided to the City and approved by the City Council. 15. Prior to City release of the plat for filing the subdivider shall provide title opinions acceptable to the City Attorney, and applicant shall meet any other title requirements as may be required by the City Attorney. Page 3 of 4 The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event it will be nec -ary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 10th day of May, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 1 0th day of May, 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said inst» :ment was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^ ^ ^ A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 1025 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - FILE NO. 2467 WHEREAS, Steve BoW on behalf of Bohland Development (hereinafter the "developer") on February 17, 1999, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a six (6) lot residential plat of property legally described as: Exhibit A attached, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property'); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with NIinnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the Municipal Code of Ordinances, Chapter 10 (Zoning Code) and Chapter 11 (Subdivision), the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 15, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on April 12, 1999, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Steve Bohl/Bohland Development, noting the following findings of fact: 1. The property is located in the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two (2) acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. 3. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as "Rural P.esidential." The site data is: Acres Sq. Ft. Site Area 45.1 1,965,764.6 Wetlands 23.0 992,224.8 Pond 0.4 17,037.0 Net Area 22.0 956,502.2 The wetland is a Type 2 and Type 3 marsh, designated "PEMC" for palustrine, emergent on the National Wetland Inventory Map. Page 1 of 8 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4 6 nNO. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The site will drain west under Willow Drive South into the wetland surrounding French Lake. The lot area data is: Total Lot Acres So. Ft.Drv Acres Sq. Ft. 1 20.8 903,071.4 6.0 260,180.5 2 9.3 406,070.3 3.6 157,146.2 3 4.4 190,102.3 2.0 87,219.5 4 2.3 101,430.4 2.0 88,536.3 5 2.4 106,800.0 2.0 87,762.5 6 2.0 87,134.8 2.0 87,134.8 Each lot meets the minimum lot area requirement. Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 are subject to a 26' wetland setback. Lot 1 is proposed to have a driveway in King Street, a public street, to be shared with the adjacent property located at 775 Brown Road South. Lot 1 will have an address on Brown Road South. Part of Lot 1 is located within 1,000 feet cf Long Lake Creek as noted on Sheet 5 of 8 dated 2-19-99, most revised 3-26-99 by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. A conditional use permit is required for grading the driveway for Lot 1 wthin of ..ic property line. Lot 2 is proposed to have access from Outlot B, a 30' outlot from the cul-de-sac for proposed Carriage Lane. The front yard for Lot 2 will be along the extension of the outlot as shown in Sheet 4 of 8 dated 2-18-99, most revised 3- 26-99. The lot line adjacent to Willow Drive South will be considered a side yard adjacent to street. Lot 2 will not have access to Willow Drive South and will not be considered a through lot. Part of the lot is located within the 1,000 feet setback from French Lake. Lot 3 is proposed to have access from the proposed cul-de-sac for Carriage Lane. Part of Lot 3 contains a wetland. Page 2 of8 i CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4 2 6VNO. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Lot 4 is proposed to have access from the proposed cul-de-sac for Carnage Lane. Lot 4 will not be considered a through lot and will not have access from Brovm Road South. Lot 5 is proposed to have access from proposed Outlot C, "Carnage Lane. No access will be provided from Willow Drive South. The property line along Willow Drive South shall be considered a side yard adjacent to street. Lot 5 is nroposed to have a stormwater management pond (NURP Pond). Lot 6 is proposed to have access from Outlot C, "Carnage Lane." No access will be provided from Willow Drive South. The property line adjacent to Willow Drive South ^vill be considered the side yard adjacent to street. Outlot B shall serve Lot 2. The outlot shall be in the ownership of Lot 2. Outlot C, "Carriage Lane," will serve Lots 3, 4, 5 and 6. Lot 2 will have acceis to Outlot C, "Carriage Lane," via Outlot B. The subdivider shall be required to execute covenants to define responsibility for construction and maintenance of Outlot C, and to define future financial obligation for repair and maintenance by a homeowner ’s association. Right-of-way will be dedicated for 33' for Brown Road South and 66 for Willow Drive South. Outlot A may be deeded to the adjacent property owner at 845 Willow Drive South. The exception. Lot 10, Block 6, Minnetonka View (vacated), which was ta,x- forfeited in 1982 and conveyed to the City of Orono may be sold to the developer for inclusion in Lot 4. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided. The property is not located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Lots 1-6 contain suitable septic sites for primary and alternate drainfields to serve single family residences. Septic sites shall be located 75 from water : pply wells and wetlands. Also septic sites shall be located 20 from impervious surfaces and property lines. Page 3 of 8 ■ilMitiii CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL .4^67NO. 18.Single family residences can be constructed on Lots 1-6 without further variances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for Bohland Development at 1025 Brown Road South per the plan set, Sheets 1-8, as prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. dated 2-18-99 as revised, subject to the followdng conditions: 1.Outlot B shall be owned by the owner of Lot 2. No access shall be provided from Outlot B to Lot 3 or Lot 6. Outlot B shall be landscaped to provide adequate screening from traffic on behalf of Lots 3 and 6. Lot 1 shall have access to Brown Road South via a driveway in King Street. Lots 2-6 shall have access to Willow Drive South via Carriage Lane. 2.Outlot C, "Carriage Lane" shall be platted at 50 ’ right-of-way. The minimum paved width shall be 24' rural section subdivision. The subdivider shall provide an underlying road and utility easement over Outlot C to the City. 3.Standard perimeter, drainage and utility easements shall be granted over the entire plat (5' along interior lot lines, 10' along exterior). 4.Drainage and grading improvements to the property shall be constructed per the drainage and grading plan approved by the City Engineer, subject to a Developer's Agreement. 5.The subdivider shall grant conservation, drainage, and flowage easements over the wetland and stormwater management pond. 6.Subdivider shall protect drainfield sites via fencing prior to construction of driveways and drainage improvements and it shall remain in place until construction is completed. 7.Subdivider shall dedicate 33' of right-of-way for Brown Road South and 66 ’ of right-of-way for Willow Drive South. Page 4 of8 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4267 8. Outlet A to be deeded to the adjacent property owner, 845 Willow Drive South. 9. Subdivider to pay the park dedication fee, as deternuned by the County Assessor, per Section 11.62. 10. No building permits shall be issued until the construction of driveway and drainage improvements is completed. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. The subdivider shall obtain appropriate permits from Hennepin County and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ^CWD). All areas within the county right-of-way disturbed during construction shall be restored. Trees shall be planted along Carriage Lane and Willow Drive South per the plan. Sheet 8 of 8 dated 3-24-99. Subdivider to provide a letter of credit for 150% of the site improvements based on the City Engineer's estimate. The City shall grant a conditional use permit for grading within 5' of the property line for Lot 1 per Resolution # 4268 The subdivider is hereby advised that the preliminary subdmsion approval will expire within one year of the date of Council approval, April 12, 2000. The subdivider is hereby advised that the City cannot grant final plat approval until a permit from the MCWD has been approved for all grading and drainage improvements. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals shall be submitted to the City two (2) weeks prior to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting: 1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"=200'. Drawing to include; Page 5 of8 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.42 A. Lot lines per survey by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., Sheet 4 of 8, dated 2-18-95, most revised 3-26-99. B. Dedication of all drainage, utility, conservation and flowage easements. C. Dedication of 33 ’ for Brown Road South and 66' for Willow Drive South. D. Naming of plat. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: A. B. C. D. E. F. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. The applicant shall provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. Signed and executed drainage, conservation and flowage easements. Signed and executed Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit. Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over Outlot C. Signed and executed covenants defining responsibility for construction and maintenance for Outlot C, defining future financial obligations. G. Completed application for private road name. 3. FEES TO BE PAID: A. Final plat fee: $200.00. B. Legal review and filing fee: $200.00. C. Park Dedication Fee 6 new lots x $4,900 = $29,400. Page 6 of 8 km ; Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 12th day of April, 1999, ATTEST: CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. __4S 3? Linda S. Vee, City Clerk GabrieKJabbour, Mayoi^ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of April, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S, Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. NOTAfiYFUBUC-Jvr.!_?EOTA•’ NOTABY •• y/ Ccrr.rr.^^s1cn 2• • ___________ - ;c*' I y Notary Public Page 7 of 8 CITY of ORONO resolution of the city council NO. ^ ^ “ EXHIBIT A prcposj :o legal description Thct por\ of ihc Nofthecsl Ouorler of Ihe Norlhwcsl Qucrtec ond Governme.^l Lol 6 Tn Section 10, Tow.nship 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesoto, described as follows: • • Commencing ol the northeast comer of sold Government Lot 6; -thence South 00 degrees • 04 minutes 55 seconds West, ossumed beoring, olong the cost line of sold Government Lot 6, o dislonce of 61.43 feet to the octuol point of beginning; thence North 00 degrcM 04 minutes 55 seconds Eost, otong the east line of sold Government Lot 6 end sold Northeost Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 1336.12 feet to the coslerly extension of the south line of King Street, os dedicoted on the plot of MINNCTONKA ViEW, according to the recorded plot thereof; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 50 seconds West, olong soid south line ond sold easterly extension,'a distance of 173.00 feel; thence'North 00 degrees 04 minutes 55 f ;onds Eost, porollel with said eost line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northyrest Quarter, o distonce of 33.00 feet to the north line soid Northeast Quorter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 50 seconds West, olong sold north lino o distance of 1154.93 feet to the northwest comer of soid Northeost Quorter of the Northwest Quorter; thence South 00 degrMS 08 minutes 30 seconds West, olong the west line of said Northeost Quarter of the Northwest Quorter, o distance of 622.71 feet to the north line of JOHNSTON'S FRENCH LAKE SECOND ADOITION. occording to the recorded plat thereof; thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes 52 seconds East, olong soid north line, o distance of 37.26 feet to the northeost comer of said JOHNSTON'S FRENCH LAKE SECOND ADDITION; thence South 02 degrees 05 minutes 38 seconds Eost, along the eost line of sold JOHNSTON’S FRENCH LAKE SECOND ADDITION, o distance of 224.10 feet; thence southerly, continuing along soid east line, olong o tongeniio curve, concove to the east, having o central ongle of 26 degrees 30 minutes 01 seconds, o radius of 669.62 feet, for on ore distance of 309.71 feet; thence South 54 degrees 43 minutes 18 seconds Eost, continuing along said east line, not tongent to the lost des^ioc curve, o. distonce of 83.06 feet; thence South 35 degrees 36 minutes 55 seconds East, continuing olong sold eost line, o distonce of 96.43 feet to the most easterly comer oi soi JOHNSTON'S FRENCH LAKE SECOND ADDITION; thence North 53 degrees 30 minutes 36 seconds Eost; o distonce of 243.02 feet; thence South 44 degrees 51 minutes 12 «conds East, o distance of 248.84 feet; thence South 47 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, o distance of 284.00 feet to the center line of Willow Drive; thence South 35 degrees 40 /minutes 44 seconds Eost, olong soid centerline o distonce of 630.17 feel lo^ o line that beers' South 41 degrees 04 minutes 55 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence North 41 degrees 04 minutes 55 seconds East, o distance of 833.84 feet to the point o beginning. Except .thcrcircm Loi 1C. Block 6, soid MINNETONKA VIEW Paee 8 of 8 o Q QC 0 CD5 2 -- ■ I •»1 i ^1 s X ^ I V V____— »'\ :i 5S V ^ J. »|i ij I li‘: Kf Ssi I \ 3 Uc: S c. § (io Q 0; (i (35 QC 2 o JC o •c ^ . s o « S O 0:5s| o .!?11^ S ji a 18? £S u■o-s^-. ^ 5s t) Q. 8^ SS £ >s5x> i? S 8 ^8e« S> o u 5£8§ 5 V, ^ v» O Q O JU •C «^.c •». o ^ 0 w i' o ^ 6 ^ o^ c o O c <3 V VI r «> >s‘ a5 8 l -9'S «^ f: to x: u c I o § § I O o §8 c5II £ o Sr- ItI* Si* Ot) S^ tt.*^ o S I? 3 Uj ^f b<| 0} to Is•• to I o «A to ‘I "tJ C C\| °§ S| tl s'.i 5; I I V- to *^8 — to o § lo:^ X3 .5 § to to to.oV. -nJ 1^ o j: «88*^ S^ k C J r%to C ^ 5; •§ ^ V o>Ki c S 8 c 8 § o|"l 0 g 0 >.>x: 0 8 |5^S Sc 12 0 o\ c ^19 i f n lii>"-d -VT^ -8=^8 S cto &§ o ^•l d.5 tiO too a . tt (I c>. o 55 <J, X* to£5, ?*• §S Sf-. I-I «o o1^3-"I2 c Oitr^i” -9 Q. to VI to 1^“'- la- 3 & to to O (S' S b 2:S I II totj \ V 8 C^ 90 01 to to £ ^£0 § o' I f'SS £^'« ^ b o Ss _ «>•? ^•■§S5 8 S b-o ~ _ o U 5 o« jj s bJS s S “ 5 ^8 <SeS^8 •a* w. *•^ -C V, O .s!“ O' ?ss Ol 00 ^ to ^ O -c o d to ^ 9 6to £ VI C O ^ to Jto to» O I to to > to "O '*gS»82U. b>«« tot3 *J<N ® «2 bV, to to w g 5 bo.^ 8 ''"osl'’.:‘:;og5a°>:^ii8o§ ^'’®5 8b5„g ^ to o x: »>■ 8 b « « o s^p|^S to "C; to .. to 3 5 ^S 0 .9 o •So S ,totooX;S ..^”tovin|,to X)^£ li:ii:«li£Jili:§rB'? |i^ sts VI i^ 6^2 VI ^ <to o «J to^;9<.*cS4C'K^-”^'"C xrOjQ8'^l'*5 ‘=S8l.,?.-Ss 8 io 8 ‘ £2«S^x: V to ^ ^ to -S to 5 £ o ^ v>to V» to = ^N ,C V. E« ‘ to to ___to Vl£ 0£^ d 8 b§ b 8<s« toS£b''0;r§^?£:;: 08 ‘"il-:8i O^o•^^.os;'^‘o£.'» ^ p* p^«So - o S ° ^ c i! '' 5 6 O *-• s ^ 8e - 8 2 £ *> 8 5 Q U”" I 3 2 8 2; •6 ■^-*2 ’^to|jtoJ^v»^ Oi 5 to ^ to ls« to o y^-s *> 9 “ o § 80j«o«oH 8 “ 3 I-* 9^ 8 8 o VI *5 p «£• to o < to t- OII ^oS-sotS-SS’c Opi*- P'"^ W Oi 2~ ^ tl^ 0-g S to to 5 u o b g||§8|.s"S|'8|8g^ c «toi<£otOb^5-9o « ^ to,. ^'SOtoc^j.to.. S > Oib to S ;„»0) j, to^ |tO o ^ V, ^ O to to to ® to^ to 5 to "S ^11^ to to X)tO ^ 3 to X x: o - c '0.3 tj .r to Yi to b^ to g o oi P s* i o cOtoxc'*to^ to to Co ^ g-l 8 E "S S p o piSS ®!2°cS8! co >-| .1 8 o’“2-?i ^ oo?-i^ig|g'’l£ilj.5 5 I .“g oto :s.s8& VI 't S »0* £«N« ^ Si ^g<1 I V. N-o •- r i - fe to o t ‘■"^<35^8 S°t r »S|5 8 8 |:5~o|Si2-.';i5b<8-'^b-?'-^''i-"S 5 O 1*^ ««^£ > £ o ^ ^ ir — to I g 5 2' |fo8|-J3 ^i3|8>| c O^ _ - o*^ tors to to VI to £ o o to to oto o ^ s ? -Qb VI 'to 3 &O :g too. sto X) I? to x:s to Ktoi to ^toto g .c ^ ^1 i; to c 3 tS Oi .C - o & S8> to "to £ 3 c <: I Ia VI to Q £ c 3 tj .9 & Cs5: %to ^•|£^ I x^ O to V o 8^ bC.ao ^o OQ. 25 i-S •» 5 toX) 8 9 •R a to M O - §s vi 8 Q. “1II to VIto O to O sII t)to VI 3 O O VIo x: -b * •O § s' b{ s II s; g>S .9o 0 1 o ^ ,^1 ^b Vu if£ V. So Itr S 3^1 to to ^ to • v>V ?-5S£ l| I” to 5 x: a b to O to 8 .!3x: I 8 I S to X^ O•c o Q. .*3 •c O) «o b) o ^ ^ to o tn o to S 3 5 X ^ l'«J{ 30» •I 2"g-'O C O I o 8 CIS'c: !s; ll So it V) ."t: i Uj Q CO' I V. to I .C & cs3: 3: k Vl U I I .5 £ to O .gx: 5I b ooto I* I Vl tj k O ^ o 5 VI 0:toQ: 9 U ^ S- >s° c o ^.9 .S £ &'5 c ^5 £ a: s'l it- Ui (^ Vi It I ^ I o b -Q to £ o ■8 X) -I ,Vi o •3 to £ toc 3 t I b VJ(? is c .9 & c I oca 3io .*5 :£ o VI to c 9 5 |5ii ^ Ifo IUj jf £1 S Ol m 6i VIto •V: I' ^160 tog 95 to O b Si-*r o '•a O'O 'S I?c o to9 Oi Westwood Professional Services, Inc. April 26, 1999 LEGAL DESCRIPTION - Proposed Monument Easements 104 Mirty Drivi Suite 3 BuHata MN SS313 Phone: (12-682-25(7 Fai: 612-682-2639 To:i Free: 1-888-682-2587 Email: wpsCwesiwoodpi.com That part of Lot 5, Block 1, CARRIAGE HILL, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described tis follows: Beginning at the most westerly comer of said Lot 5; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 5 a distance of25 00 feet; thence southeasterly angle left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 25.00 feet; thence southwesterly angle left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 25.00 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 5; thence northwesterly, along said southwesterly line, a distance of 25.00 feet to the point of beginning. ALSO That part of Lot 6, Block I, CARRIAGE HILL, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County. Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the most southerly corner of said Lot 6; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of said Lot 6 a distance of 25.00 feet; thence northwesterly angle right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 25.00 feet: thence southwesterly angle right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 25.00 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 6; thence southeasterly , along said southwesterly line, a distance of 25.00 feet to the point of beginning. Dfsignmg the Future CARRIAGE HILL % 20'40 ’60 ’ / / / \ / z' \rl ''V Z ' \k^ ,\ / / / 90® 90®> 90® X \ N54°19 16 25.00 ».1 /- »' r- -^,90® \ / oA / .--o' rP' N54°19 16 25.00 V' A 90® I \ '' X/N54°19'16 ”E /X 25.00 -X ' ».. rN »> ,x> ‘p- / „»VV\ \i //'\oX X X X A' / /■ Ap«^-09-99 03:14P Control No. CITY OF OKONO PRIVATE ROAtMAY REQUEST A.The euhjsct oT this rotjusst l8i an existing private roadway. a propoaed private roadway which is to be created aa a ^ condition of pending subdivision approval. B.The owner(s) of this Private Roadway and/or all abutting property will be (are) the owner(s) of the following described property: C.The above owner(s) hereby request that this Private Roadway be known by the following name: Choice No. 1 [Choice No. 2 Choice No. 3 (Hat three choices in order of preference. The City Council will approve a name provided no conflict exists with existing names or naming policy. If all names have a conflict, you will be asked to make new choices. The approved name will be used for all mailing address and official identification purposes.) 0.The above owner(s) hereby request the City of Orono to install the following standard street and traffic signs and said owner(s) hereby agree to reimburse the City for all costs of said in8t<^llation. (Such signing may be required as part of a separate Developer's Agreement and/or subdivision request.) standard city street name 8ign(s) - number required / . _ / _ _ _ _ _ _ _standard "STOP" sign(s) - number required atandard traffic slgn(s) described below: - pufflber required The above owner(s) do hereby acknowledge the (future) existence of said private road, and that the City of Orono has no obligation to maintain or service said private road, and that the City of Orono does not intend to acquire or open said private road as a public roadway. Signacure(s) of owner^): (^6Qgvi « Date Da tc I P.03 .A Ilk Hennepin County •V" • “ JL Aa EqujI Opporlttnil^TjmploTer___________S/_ fmm tv-- •v*>» -v^'i V ViiiD April 12,1999 APR 1 5 1999 Cil Y w, - o. lUiVG Ms. Liz Van Zomeren City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Proposed Plat - Carriage Hill CSAH 146, NW quad of Willow Drive Section 10, Township 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 2491 Review and Recommendations Dear Ms. Van Zomeren: Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surv-eys, require county review of proposed plats abutting county roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: • The developer should dedicate 40 feet of right of way from and along the centerline of CSAH 146, South Brown Road. Tills action will accommodate any future upgrading as well as utilities, snow storage, etc. • Enhancing the King Street entrance as a shared private driveway is acceptable. >io other direct access to CSAH 146 will be permitted. • All proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to access, drainage^d utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 745-7601 for the appropriate permit forms. • The developer must restore all areas, within the county right of way, disturbed during construction. Please direct any response to Dave Zetierstrom at 745-7643. As a matter of procedure, we request that the City Clerk inform us of the City Council's action on the right of way and access provisions. Sincerely, ------------------------- Thomas D. Sfohnson, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer TDJ:DKZ:jrh cc: PeteTulkki Brad Moe Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340-5421 (612)745-7500 FAX: (612) 478-4000 TDD: (612) 852-6760 Recyeltd Paper ROAD, DRAINAGE /VND UTILITIES EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made and entered into tliis ilay oT , 19 by and between BohLand Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation hereinafter referred to as "Grantur(s)" and the City of Oiono, a municipal corporation, its employees, interests and assigns, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee". WIINESS, THAT Grantor(s), in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other go‘:d and valuable consideration given by Grantee, (lie receipt of which is acknowledged by Grantor(s), do(es) hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement for public ingress, egress, access, road, drainage and utility purposes, over, under, above and across the land located in the Stale of Mirmesota, County of Hennepin, legally described as follows: Outlet C, Carriage Hill including, but not by way of limitation, a full and free right and authority to enter upon said land to conslnjct, install, maintain, operate, repair and rcconslriicl a sanitary sewer interceptor, lift station, main or line, a water main or line, gravel or paved road and any aiK. .ill appurtenance^, including drainage control structures and drainageways, incidental and related thereto, (such arc hereafter collectively referred to as the Improvements), and the Grantee shall have the right to make such use of said land as is reasonably necessary and advisable to the construction installation, inainlcnancc, operation and repair of the Improvements. In addition to any other remedy the Grantee may have, the covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. Grantor(s) covenant that they are in fee title to the above property, have a lawful right and authority to convey and grant this easement, and that the land is free from all encumbrances except: Grantors have execut^.d this document the day and year set forth above. Page I of 2 GRANTOR BohLand Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation By:91O.(2.0>jX^ Steven R. Bohl Its: President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of » 19 <\c^ by Steven R. Bohl, the President of BohLand Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation on behalf of the corporation. MlCHAatHOEKSTRA N01AnrPUeU(>MINNESOTA My Coontoioa Eivim Jn 31,2000 This instrument was drafted by: POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN, LTD. 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 333-4800 Page 2 of 2 FLOWAGE AINU CONSERVATION EASEMENT AGREEMENT AND WAIVER OF DAMAGES 11 US INDEN i URJC, tnncle niid eiilerecl into this__clay of -.19____by and between BoliLand Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation jjg i,drs, assigns, and successors |hereinafler collectively rereried to as the Giantor(s)] and the City of Orono, its successors and assigns, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hetcinafier referred to as llie Grantee.) WI i NESSE1I I, Gianlor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($ 1,00) and other valuable consideration, hereby covenant, grant, gift, cpiit claim and convey to grantee tlie riglit to restiicl and grantor(s) agree to limit and preclude the use, improvement and development, under the conditions and covenants herein contained, the following described Land in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota: over the wetland and stormwater management pond as depicted on the plat of CARRIAGE Hill ns follows: 1. Granlor(s) hereby covenant(s) and agree A.No structures shall be constructed, elected, or placed upon, above, or bcncatli the Land including without limitation, fences, firciilaccs, steps, docks, piers, haidcovcr or roads of any nature whatsoever, or any other structure or improvement inconsistent with the natural state of the land. D.No trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be destroyed, cut or removed from the Land e.xcept as authorized by written consent of Grantee. C.No earth, loam, jicat, gravel, soil or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from the Land and there shall l»c no dredging or c.xcavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the topography of the Land without the written consent of Grantee, D.No soil, sand, grav;;! or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land and no waste, trash or gaibage shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Land. Page 1 of3 I ]1. 2. 3. F, No use shall be made of the Laud except uses, if any, wliich will not change or alter the natural condition of the Land, and no use which would tend to change Uie drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, fish and wildlife habitat characteristics shall be made of the Land or the water situated thereon. Grantee may enter upon the Land for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the Land without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substances, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the Land. Grantor(s) hereby grant, gift, quit claim and convey to Grantee, a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Land. Grantor(s) iicrein do hereby remiss, release, acquit and forever discharge, forever, the Grantee and any and all of its officers and employees of and from any and all claims, demand or causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever wliich may arise or accrue by virtue of any flowage or trespass with water within terms of tliese agreements. In addition to any other remedy the grantee may have, the covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. Grantor(s) do not intend that the public should have any interest in the above land by virtue of this indenture or otherwise, except as hereinabove set forth. The Grantor(s) herein certify that the land herein described are free and clear of all encimibrances except: All provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, representatives, grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. BohLand Development, Inc., a Minnesota -oorpor*at-fen- en R. BohlBy: Steven Its: President Page 2 of 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 1 his insliuinciil was acknowlodged before me tliis day of , 19 by Steven R. Bohl, the President of BohLand Development, Inc., a corporation under the laws of Minnesota on behalf or the corporation. ^ -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -’ STATE DEED TAX DUE HEUEON This inslrumeiil is dialled by: Cily of Oiono P.O. Box 06 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 OTARY PUBLIC m My Commission Expires Jan. 31.2000 Page 3 of 3 Date of Application: 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60 day Hnut: 4/1V/99 COUNCIL MEETING APR 1 2 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY wnuivu DATE: ITEM NO.: /O Department Approval: Name Liz Van Zomeren Title City Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:/5^2467 Steve Bohl/Bohland Developin' nt i025 Brown Road South Class m Preliminary Plat-6 lot subdivision Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Lot Area:45.13 acres • • # Application: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property located at 1025 South Brown Road into six (6) residential lots. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Rural Residential. It is located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The properties to the south are sewered and a sewer project is planned for the properties directly to the north. There are several issues with the application as follows: The dedication of right-of-way for South Brown Road and Willow Drive South, 2. The 50' x 200' tax-forfeited parcel next to South Brown Road. 3. The parcel to be identified as Outlot A across Willow Drive South to be deeded to the adjacent property owner. 4. The grading for a driveway witiin 5' of the property line for Lot 1 re''nires a conditional use permit. The applicant has worked with staff to incorporate the City Engineer’s, Landscape ArcWtect s and Planning Commission ’s comments. The blueprints that are included in the City Council's packets include the latest revisions. Dtlc of Application: 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60 day limit: 4/17/99 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Comniission recommended approval, subject to incorporation of the conditions in the staff report. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To discuss the tax-forfeited parcel for inclusion in Lot 4 and provide direction to staff. To review the two resolutions, one for the preliminary plat, and one for the conditional use permit for grading the driveway for Lot 1 and amend or adopt the resolutions. Attachments RESOLUTIONS A B C D E F Letter from applicant Notice of PC action Staff drawing of Planning Commission's comments Memo from Landscape Architect Memo from Westwood Engineering reiWetland delineation Staff report to PC dated March 15, 1999 (see staff report for list of exhibits) Development, Inc. A City of Orono Liz Van Zomeren City Planner 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, Minnesota 55323 March 31,1999 1 RECEIVED MAR ^ 1 1999 CtfV 0R0i\’0 Thank you for the acceptance of our Preliminaryl ’lat application and the commits we received following the Planning Commission Meeting. We are submitting revised plans for the City Council Meeting. The changes should address the comments made by City of Orono staff, the engineer and landscapers. There are two areas that 1 would like to have you consider in reference to the planners and landscapers comments. The planner suggested that we include a street design and construction with “urban” specifications. This alternative, in my opinion, is not necessary and is inconsistent with previous developments, and does not fulfill the characteristics of a more rurol/ acreage smaller subdivision. I am requesting that the most commonly used street design and stormwater management practices be implemented. Carriage Hill is the name of the development and is characteristic of the topography, history and feel for the neighborhood. TTie homes will be built on acreage homesites with a country or rural feel. This is what the market accepts and is desiring. Three of the homesites are already under contract for sale pending development approval, all three of the potential homeowners prefer a 24’ street with grade ditches which is more typical for the setting. They prefer the landscaping comments regarding trees along Willow Drive and up along Carriage Lane. Our application shows the design with surface storm water management allowing flow to a NLIRP pond and eventually into French Lake. This plan has also been submitted to Jim Hafner at Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. After conversations with Jim, he commented that in this situation, continuing to allow water to surface drain, combined with the permeable sandy soil is a beneficial BMP that allows for an increased ability to improve water quality. This is in contrast to dumping all of the water off the roofs, drives and street into catch basins and into the pond without having the opportunity to increase water quality with the surface flow eind on-site absorption. The more impervious the surface reduces the opportunity to improve water quality especially with the sandy soils. 420 Upland Lane North • Plymouth, MN 55447 • Phone (612) 476*4459 • FAX (612) 476*4459 The pond may need to be increased for additional water quantity if a sub-surface storm sZ Zrr Zangemen, lre1l4TStorm sewer systems also require maintenance compared to surface stormwatermanagement. and maybe the only smaller Pniar manageLnl and curbs.Pillar Homes a homebuilding company that I own is currently building in this nei^borhood. The curbing easily becomes damaged. The site needed fhis type of storm urbM ZeteZ"' '•''™ately reduces the character of a “mpleling a twenty-lot subdivision in the City of Independeiice that provides surface storm water management and is an important charactenstic to feel of the neighborhood and improves water quality. non- ZScvro* tJr'' i" purchasing in Carriage Hill, comments f of anon-urban streetscape lamrequesting that we approve the application that we have submitted. includes adding trees along Willow Drive and Carriage Lane. The exception to the landscapers comments would be to eliminate the additional \ adjoining BroNvn Road. This request comes form the purchaser of this lot. He is requesting that additional trees not be added because of the many mature trees that are already in place and keep as much remaining sunlight as possible in his backyard. The other exception would be not to add any trees around the the landscape plan for the individual homeowners and will approve all landscape pl^s Homeowners Association By Laws. Any trees on these portions of the lots will probably be destroyed during construction. darted Mamh 16^ [999°"^® additional recommendations from the Planning Commission ^ ‘ I CUP land alteration application and paid the appropriate fees for lot 1 The tree inventory inside the grading limits for lot 1 will be completed for the final application. A larger scale grading plan has been submitted showing the 6’ edition to the existing driveway and the proposed grading detail for lot 1. The dnveways for lots 5 and 6 will have access from Carriage Lane Landscape (see above) Lot 2 yards ai^ setbacks shown as determined by str.ff and Planning Commission. ex^ained^Sove according to suggestions with the exceptions as 0 3. 4. 5. 6. We also discussed the possibility of the City of Orono deeding the “exception piece” along Brown Road to include with this plat. The buyer for lot 4 is interested in this' becoming part of Ws lot. Outlot A as shown on the plan could be deeded to the ovyners of the adjoining property. I would like to suggest that the City of Orono deed without cost the exception piece” and in turn BohLand Development deed outlot A to the adjoining property owner at no cost. This proposal would make this a cleaner plat and resolve any further issues between property owners. Please note that the property lines for the exception piece (Richardson’s property) along Willow Drive have been altered. We found that the Richardson’s, and our property, had discrepancies between the two legal descriptions. BohLand development and the Richardson s are exchanging the north and easterly property boundaries to resolve the discrepancy. This will be resolved along with the filing of the plat. Please consider these options and forward to the City Council for review. Sincerely, Ji(2.t^Q>oSU2. Steven Bohl BohLand Development 13 crrv OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, IVIN 55323 PHONE:(612)249-4600 FAX:(612)249-4616 TO: Steve Bohl 420 Upland Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 TYPE OF APPLICATION: DATE OF MEETING: 3/15/99 ZONING FILE #2467 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: March 16, 1999 COPIES TO: Subdivision VOTE:5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below: 1.Need conditional use permit for grading driveway for Lot 1. (Need more detail at larger scale.) 2. Need to have access for Lots 5 and 6 from Carriage Lane, not the cul-de-sac. 3.Incorporate landscape architect's recommendations for screening on lots and right-of- way. 4. Lot 2 yards and setbacks as identified. 5. Incorporate City Engineer's comments. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of the above information. Deadline for the April 12th meeting is April 1. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. X;\APPS\\VPV\TX60\\VTDOCS'.CAROLE\PCACnONU467 IL 03/14/99 13:49 FAX 812 337 6601 DSU, INC.@001 4' 'vj rr;. • k DAI-ILGREN SHARDLOW AND UBAN IHCOHrOKATID CONSULTING PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH SUITE 210 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55401 (512-339-3300 PHONE 6I2 337-5601 FAX T> ■ ' ■ To fLj From Prone* • •• DATE: TO: FROM: 14 March 1999 Elizabeth Van Zomeren Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Fax 612-249*4616 Wallace L. Case, ASLA Landscape Architect/Planner XL Oif RE:Review of Preliminary Plat Submission Drawings Class 111 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Bohland Development 1026 Brown Road S. Application # 2467 In response to your request, we have visited the site, reviewed the Preliminary Plat Submission Drawings for the proposed Carriage Hill Development and have the following comments. % I nT 1 ISSUES The proposed development of Lot 1 raises several Issues that need to be addressed. Access: The developer proposes providing access to Lot 1 from Brown Road S by widening an existing driveway that serves an existing home to the nort . 1.Existing access at this location Is provided by a very obscure, narrow cut through a 8 to 12 feet high embankment. The existing narrow cut and a high concrete retaining wall Immediately along the north side of the existing drive limits visibility into and out of the drive. The proposed plans for accessing Lot 1 call for a O:\JOBSM 601\CARHt.999\999CARHL.MeM 03/14/99 13:49 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU, INC.[^002 2. 3. Tree removal: widened and combined drive which will increase the visual ’ prominence of the drive, and improve visibility to and from the drive. However, the sight distance to the north needs to be reviewed. The building site for Lot 1 is iocated on a wooded island surrounded almost entirely by wetland. The prof.’osed driveway for this location is approximately 480 feet long. It is west facing, has a maximum grade of 10 percent, and requires approximately 100 feet retaining wall {approximately 5 high) along each side where it crosses between the wetland edges. Depending on the height of this wall, it may require a railing along the top for safety and to meet code. The proposed grading for the drive would result In a diversion of surfaca runoff onto the adjacent northern property. Appropriate drainage rights must be secured from the owner of that property. 1. 2. This driveway in combination with the building site and septic field will require the removal of approximately .95 acres of woods. The developer should provide mo»’e detailed Information about the size and type of trees that will be removed or affected by the development of this lot and drive. Several large maple/basswood trees located along Brown Road S just south of the proposed access point would be removed or affected by the proposed access design. If possible large/significant trees should be preserved and incorporated into the grading design of the Lot 1 and the access point. The Subdivision Regulations indicate that trees shown as retained must be protected and preserved. The root zones of trees and woods to remain are to be fenced and maintained as off limits to construction activities. Any damage to trees to be preserved is to be treated by trained arborist. Wetlands Encroachment; The nature and source of the wetland boundary shown on the plans was not identified. A field wetland delineation and survey should be provided where the drive cresses or where septic fields are proposed at the minimum 75 feet setback from the wetlands. The grading plan shows a -2- 03/14/99 13:50 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU, INC.®003 possible grading encroachment into the 26 feet wetland buffer at the Lot 1 crossing area. I AMDSCAPING; In accordance with Section 11.60, Subd. 2 of the Orono Subdivision Regulations, as a requirement of subdivision approval, the City Council may require that the subdivider plant shade trees on the property along the project roads or abutting roads. The requirement calls for planting one shade tree {2 inch caliper) per every forty feet of frontage and identifies that the trees planted shall be long-lived shade trees. 1. The entire southern part of the site is currently an open field with volunteer trees at the fence line along the existing roads. After development, the view from the adjacent streets will be of the rear yards and private spaces of the new homes. The visual appearance of the project as viewed from the public streets and adjacent properties would be improved by the addition of shade trees along the southern 650 feet of Willow Drive, the rear yard of Lot 4 along Brown Road S, and both sides of Carriage Lane. We recommend the City require the developer to plant deciduous shade trees at 50 feet spacing along the right-of-way of Carriage Lane and southern 650 feet of Willow Drive. We also recommend that the City require the developer to plant an evergreen or ornamental tree buffer in the rear yard of Lot 4, and groups of ornamental/overstory trees around the prooosed drainage basin in the southwest corner of the site. 2. Lot 2 functions as a flag lot and it will require approximately 150 feet of driveway between the side yards of Lots 3 and 6. The City should require the developer to provide an adequate landscape buffer along the sides of this drive. mm DING ENCROACHMENT The plans shown an apparent encroachment of two existing buildings onto Lot 4. This encroachment should be verified and appropriately resolved with the adjacent land owner. RFPTir. SYSTEM SETBACK The minimum septic field setback from existing wetlands and water bodies is 75 feet. Upo'’. completion, the proposed drainage pond in the southwestern part of the site will act as a small pond or wetland and will drain to the southwest under Willow Drive. The septic field for Lot 6 is setback approximately BO feet from the NWL elevation of this basin. 03/14/99 13:50 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU, INC.@004 The septic field locations must be fenced off and protected from construction ‘ activities. PRORIQN CONTROL The developer must ensure that erosion control be provided, monitored and maintained wherever needed until the vegetative cover in the disturbed areas of each lot has been fully and finally restored. If you have questions regarding these comments, or If I can be of further assistance, please call me at 339-3300. DAHLQREN, SHARDLOW, and UBAN, INC. Wallace L. Case, ASIA Landscape Architect/Planner .4- 03/15/99 17:04 FAX 6129375822 WESTWOOD PROF. SERVICES 12)002 Westwood Pfofesjicna) Services, Inc.iT E March 15,1999 Mr. Steve Dohl Bohland Development, Inc. 420 Upland Lane N. Plymoutli, MN 55447 , •7593 An*sttn Ofiw tl«n Piiitle. MN 55344 Phon«;<12-9]7S1SO fjK 6I2-937-5S2} Toll Fi««; U8S-937-S;53 ClM<l. npiSvieUACC^pCCcn Ref: 98795 Re: Wetland review process for Carriage Hill Reiildentlal Development, Orono, WIN Dear Steve: This letter is to summarize the wetland review process wc initiated last fall for the Carriage Hill Residential Development and identify the actions we will take to complete the wetland review process prior to final approval of tlie proposed development. Westwood Professional Services reviewed the property in tlie field in November, 1998 to identify existing wetland boundaries and assess the extent to which wetlands constrained site development. The development area includes part of DNR Protected Wetland 27-864W, which we understand will be avoided. A partial wetland delineation was eompleted in November to identify wetland boundary locations in selected areas and allow concept planning to advance. Because wc understood that each residential lot must include a minimum of two acres of upland, wc mapped the wetland boundaries that were not delineated. Upland acreage was then calculated for each future residential lot Wetland boundary mapping was completed in AutoCAD and was based on a combination of field observation of existing conditions, aerial photograph interpretation, and topographic mapping. It will be necessary to complete the wetland review process with the City of Orono and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District before final approvals are obtained. The wetland boundary delineation will bo completed using the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987) and we will request confirmation from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District that the wetland boundaries arc acceptable for local administration of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, as amended. Wetland boundary flags will be located by Land Surveyors and the approved wetland delineation will be used to confirm that all proposed residential lots include at least two acres of upland. The Site Plan will be reviewed to ensure it complies with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and City of Orono requirements for wetland buffers and setbacks, respectively. Any concerns tliat arise at that time will be resolved in coordination with the watershed, city, or other agencies, as appropriate. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this approach. Sincerely, . WESTWOOD PROFESSION.^L SERVICES, INC. Robin P. Bouta Senior Environmental Scientist 0fsl9rlrg chi Furu'i fodii ..siAct 1972 MorcM^ PC 1 •; 0 TO; Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: RE: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator #2467 Bohland Development, having an interest in 1025 Browm Road South (PID# 10-117-23-24-0001) Class III Preliminary Plat Subdivision-Public Hearing Exhibits: A B C D E F Application Plat map Owner's list Zoning map Section Map City Engineer's report (BLUEPRINTS) G H I J K L Water Quality review Septic Report Topo Map MUSA map Webber Hills project map Preliminary Plat drawings Zoning:RR-IB Comprehensive Plan: One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres, unsewered) Rural Residential Application: The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 45.1 acre parcel lying between Willow Drive South and Brown Road South into 6 parcels for single family residential development. Tlie parcel is located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (I/fUSA) and is planned for rural residential development at 2 acres, according to the Comprehensive Plan. The subdivision will require a conditional use permit for grading within 5' of the property line to create a driveway for Lot 1 and may also require a variance to grade/fill within 26' of the wetland. The septic sites for Lot 5 may require a variance from the 75' setback from the NURP pond. This application will also require the dedication of right-of-way for Brown Road South and Willow Drive South. The subdivision is also subject to drainage, flowage and conservation easements for the wetlands. A park dedication fee wll also be - required. U2467 Bohland Development Class III Subdivision PC-3/15/99 page-1 DESCRIPTION OF AREA The proposed subdivision is bordered by Willow Drive South and Brown Road South. The parcel is 45.1 acres with 23 acres of wetland in the middle of the site. The parcel is located partially within 1000' of Long Lake Creek and within 1000' of French Lake. The surrounding area is fully developed with single family homes that were constructed during the 1900's through the 1950's. TOPOGRAPHY 1 ne wetland area in the middle section of the parcel has an elevation below 932. The area north of the wetland rises from 932 to 959.2 at its highest elevation. The southern portion of the parcel rises from the 932 elevation to a high point of 967.2. Both the north and south areas drtiin into the wetland. The southern portion of the parcel has been used for agricultural purposes and is characteristic of a field. The northern portion of the parcel is heavily wooded. ZONING The parcel is zoned RR-IB, Rural Residential District. The minimum lot area requirement is 2 acres. The minimum setback requirements are noted in the table below. Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Adjacent to Street 2 acres, dry buildable 200'50'50'30'50' Wetland Setback No building, excavation or grading or filling is allowed in or within 26' of the wetlands. The proposed grading for the driveway to Lot 1 appears to encroach into this required setback. Septic Setback The minimum setback requirements for septic systems is 75' from wetlands and water supply wells. Septic systems shall be a minimum of 20' from hardcover surfaces, property lines, buildings and buried pipes. The proposed septic sites for Lot 5 are too close to the NURP pond. The septic sites should be 75' from the NURP pond. U2467 Bohland Development Class III Subdivision PC-3/15/99 page-2 PARCEL INFORMATIONProperty Identification:The subdivision includes the following parcels:' » * •38 10-117-23 21 0001 38 10-117-23 21 0007 39-10-117-23 24 0001 The above parcels are under the ownership of E.S. Borman and J.E. Corwin. Julius Hendel is listed as the taxp: yer. The tax data indicates that it has been previously taxed as vacant residential land. Exception: A 50' by 200' strip of wetland is shown as an exception along the east property line of the propdsed subdivision. This parcel of land was tax-forfeited in 1982 to the State of Miimesota. It was conveyed to the City of Orono for drainage purposes. Greg Gappa, Public Services Director, has indicated that it is not needed by the City. If Ae City made this parcel available to the applicant, the entire wetland area west of Brown Road South could be included in a conservation and flowage easement agreement. Proposed Lots: LOT INFORMATION Lot Total Dry 1 20.8 acres 5.7 acres 2 9.3 acres 3.6 acres 3 4.4 acres 2 acres 4 2.3 acres 2 acres 5 2.4 acres 2 acres 6 2 acres 2 acres #2467 Bohland Development Class III Subdivision PC-3/15/99 page-3 Lot Area:Wetlands:NURP:Net Dry Buildable Area:45.1 acres 23.4 acres .4 acres 21.3 acresThe proposed subdivision creates six lots that meet the minimuin lot area requirements of 2 acres of dry buildable land.Loti Lot 1 is the largest parcel with 20.8 acres total with 5.7 acres dry buildable. Due to the configuration of Lot 1 and access from King Street, Lot 1 may not be further subdivided. A portion of Lot 1 is located within 1000' of Long Lake Creek. This part of the lot is subject to hardcover requirements. No more than 35% of the lot area in this setback from Long Lake Creek may be hardcover. Access to Lot 1 is proposed by constructing a private driveway in King Street. The City Engineer questions whether two separate driveways should be allowed next to each other instead of a shared driveway. The amount of grading to install a driveway also requires review by MCWD because there may be an impact on the wetland. Construction easements and retaining walls may also be necessary. Because this is not ordinary and customary grading next to a property line, a conditional use permit in addition to a land alteration permit will be necessary. Lot 2 Lot 2 is a 9.3 acre parcel with 3.6 acres dry buildable. The proposed lot could not be further subdivided. The lot will have frontage on Willow Drive, however, access shall not be allowed via Willow Drive. Therefore, the setback from Willow Drive should be considered a side yard adjacent to street. The proposed subdivision indicates that this lot will be served by an outlot (148' x 30') from the cul-de-sac. TTie City Engineer recommends that the City discuss whether this is acceptable. The odd shaped lot creates a problem for determining how to define the yards and corresponding setbacks. Should this lot be considered a backlot because it is behind the existing residence on Willow Drive and served via an outlot froi.i the cul-de-sac? Septic sites on this lot will need to be at least 75' from the wetland. Lot 3 Lot 3 is 4.4 acres with 2 acres dry buildable. This lot cannot be further subdivided. It is proposed to be served by the cul-de-sac. The septic sites need to be 20' from the property lines and 75' from the wetland. The outlot that provides access to Lot 2 will require that a 50' setback be provided next to the outlot. U2467 Bohland Development Class III Subdivision PC-3/15/99 page—4 Lot 4 Lot 4 is an odd-shaped lot that w technically considered a through lot because it has potential access from Brown Road. This lot also surrounds the exception that should be sold to the developer and included in the lot. Lot 4 is proposed to be served by the cul-de-sac. The final resolution should state that no access will be allowed from Brown Road. Lot 5 Lot 5 is proposed to be 2.4 acres with 2 acres dry buildable. This lot is proposed to have the NURP pond. It is also proposed to be served by the cul-de-sac even though it has potential access from both Willow Drive and the private road, "Carriage Lane*'. Access shall be prohibited from Willow Drive and the driveway for this lot shall be from Carriage Lane, not the cul-de-sac. Lot 6 Lot 6 is proposed to be 2 acres of dry buildable land. This lot has frontage on Willow Drive and Carriage Lane. The driveway is proposed from the cul-de-sac. The driveway shall be installed from Carnage Lane and access from Willow Drive shall be prohibited. This lot will be subject to two side yard adjacent to street setbacks, from Willow Drive and the outlot/cul-de-sac. The septic sites need to be at least 20' from the property lines. ACCESS The subdivider proposes access for Lot 1 to be provided via a driveway in King Street. King Street is platted as a dead end street. Currently there is a driveway in King Street that serves 775 Brown Road South (Simpson residence). The subdivider is proposing to construct a driveway next to the existing driveway. The City Engineer has raised concerns about this proposal. (See Exhibit F). The other five lots are proposed to be served by a private road, "Carriage I lill Lane", from Willow Drive South. Lots 2,5, and 6 have frontage on Willow Drive, however, access shall not be allowed from these lots directly to Willow Drive. Lots 1 and 4 also have possible access to Brown Road. Access to Lot 1 shall be from King Street and Lot 4 shall not be allowed to have a driveway curb cut on Brown Road. The subdivider has shown Lots 3,4, 5, and 6 as having driveways from the cul-de-sac. Lots 5 and 6 should be served from Carriage Hill Lane. Lot 2 is proposed to have access from an outlet platted at 148' in length and 30' in width. The City Engineer has concerns about an outlot being platted from the cul-de-sac. #2467 Bohtand Development Class HI Subdivision PC-3/15/99 page-5 Carriage Hill Lane shall be platted at a 50' right-of-way with a payed width of 24'. The length of the private road is approximately 350' from Willow Drive South to the center of the cul-de-sac in conformance with the subdivision requirements. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The subdivider has proposed a NURP pond in the comer of Lot 5. The proposed location of the NURP pond is too close to the property line. It should be at least 55' from the property line so that a septic site on the adjacent property could be located 20' from the property line without requiring a variance. Allowing the NURP pond to be located on or adjacent to the property line impacts the adjacent property's ability to locate a septic site in the future. The NURP pond is also too close to the septic sites for Lot 5 and does not have an adequate bench of 10:1. Septic sites are required to be at least 75' from a wetland or pond. The City Engineer has recommended that the storm sewer be constructed to route storm flows from the street to the pond. All storm pipes are recommended to be reinforced concrete pipes instead of corrugated metal pipes. The pond needs to have an outlet structure that provides 1' of skimming to remove floatables and debris. Permanent erosion control should be installed downstream from the pond to prevent sedimentation into French Lake. SEPTIC SYSTEMS The parcel is not within the MUSA line. The Crystal Bay sewer project is to the south of the proposed subdivision. The Webber Hills sanitary sewer project is proposed for the area to the north of this subdivision. On-site septic systems are proposed for this development. The septic sites are required to be 75' from the wetlands and NURP pond and at least 20' from property lines and hardcover. Staff has not been able to verify the septic information because the ground is still frozen. Fhis preliminary plat shall not move forward until Steve Weckman, On-Site Septic Systems Manager, has been able to approve each proposed primary and secondary site. Any site that does not meet the City's requirements may require that the preliminary plat and proposed lots lines and ponding area be revised. • • DEDICATIONS The subdivider shall be required to dedicate 33' of right-of-way for Brown Road (County Road 146) and 66' of right-of-way for Willow Drive. This will leave Outlot A separated from the proposed #2467 Bohland Development Class 111 Subdivision PC-3/15/99 page—6 subdivision. Outlot A should be made available to the abuttting property at 845 Willow Drive South for legal access. EASEMENTfr The subdivider shall provide standard drainage and utility easements along interior and exterior property lines (5* interior and 10' exterior). The subdivider shall also provide drainage, conservation and flowage easements across the wetland. Road and utility easements and maintenance agreements will be required for the private road. Carriage Hill Lane. VEGETATION MAP The subdivision ordinance provides in Section 11.60 for the preservation of natural features and amenities. The subdivider shall provide a vegetation map that shows the number and location of existing trees on site to be preserved. The ordinance provides that the City may require the subdivider to provide shade trees along the perimeter of the subdivision; one shade tree may be planted every 40 feet. The proposed preliminary plat has been sent to Wally Case, DSU landscape architect for review. His comments will be provided at the Planning Commission meeting. The Park Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary plat at their March meeting and requested land for a buffer strip along Willow Drive to plant trees for screening of the houses from the road. However, staff does not recommend that the City accept land for tree planting. Staff prefers to wait for the landscape architect's recommendation for screening and buffering in accordance with the subdivision ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION To review and discuss: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. King Street and proposed driveway, grading, filling and conditional use permit Lot configuration and setbacks Proposed access, driveways and outlot Septic sites and setbacks from NURP pond Design and setback for NURP pond Vegetation and landscaping Outlot A and exception area #2467 Bohland Development Class III Subdivision PC^3/15/99 page-7 A Application # _ Date Received 3 - (7-?*? Amount Paid 6-^ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION • • PROPERTY LOCATION __ Site address /QP-S ^ • Property Identification Number (PID)_______ Please check one - Property y abstract or Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Name_I^^ Address City_____ torrens? 00<^7 (q (( 7 C<iCi (17 P3 I Q^ i^ /N1 / 5 V V^c>^i oA,-.cl ' ,_Phone(h ^------ S^^v-7 Phone (home) Phone (work) ^/7~3 ‘ kS i I OWNER (if difierent than applicant) Name___£,<*«’ y4T+’-v4^ Address City Zip Phone (home) _ Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) existing land use Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District PROPOSAL <Jci C-»^V Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels . \ Residential; no. of units____ Other (specify)_________ Division for Tax Purposes __ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites O _ Existing Units C, New Units C>r Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) / Units per *7 Acres ^ «.cr^ -Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land tC Residential Other (specify) _________ MINIiVIUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Paj-ment of fees (refer to "application fees" listed below. 2. Completed application form. 3. Preliminaiy plat information on Certificate of Survqr. 4. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Go\t. Center 348-3271). 5. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Zoning Official ’s Signature ______________________|_________________Date MINIMUM MATERIALREQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FINAL APPLICATION ' • 1. Payment of fees (refer to Preliminary Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit Zoning Official's Signature _________________________________ Date !• APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check pC] those which apply) A. Application Base Fees: _____ Sketch Plan Review (Class I, n&in)S250.00 ____ Subdivision ofa Lot Line Rearrangement $350.00 I Subdivision Application (Class I & II) $350.00 _____ Preliminary Subdivision ApplicaUon $375.00 + $25.00/Iot (Class fil & all non-residential) _____ Final Plat Application (Class III) $200.00 _____Legal Review and Filing: _____Subdivision only $75.00 _____Subdivision w/easements and covenants mur $200.00 _____ Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) « Legal and Engineering Review Fees (as incurred) _____ Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change from original application) _____ Renewal of Class III, Preliminary Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change from original application) Renewal of Fmal Class III Subdivision Application $150.00 (No change from original application) Totals .SSOr B. Special Improvement Fees: _____ Proposed Private Roads $600.00 + $.50/lineal ft; _____ Proposed Public Roads $900.00 + $.50/lineal ft; . lia ft X .50 >= $. lin. ft X .50 ® $ f 30o Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $900.00 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.00 + $25/stub Proposed Watermain Extension $250.00 + $25/stub Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) $200.00 On-Site System, Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $50.00/per lot x ^ new lots C. Flexible Application Fees/Mbe. Fees Variance $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) _____ _____ Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision $ 100.00 _____ PRD Application with Subdivbion $30.00/Dwelling Unit _______ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Adnunistrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Platming Commission and Courj^il njc^ssaty.^0 i^^es^<4fiS\application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature ___Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City Office 25 days before the Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meefings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. REC£iVSD MAR 2 3 '599 C\T'^ OK0t\O Application# (L.U»P. Date Received. Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address S Type of Application to be Filed Cor<^. P!>g Ag-^vet Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)4-4~»eCv ^ ( APPLICANT Name Address M>o Opl«^€>( c.^ OWNER C*f different than applicant) Name Phone (horned ^7C ______ P!;one (work) C JP ^ City Zip •{ 'y Phone (home). Phone (wprk). Address City Date Property Acquired _j________________________________ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _____$ 75.00 For each variance request vnth CUP application _____$175.00 Residential Accessory Use _____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest Hous^Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use « . i $250.00 Land Alteration ■? of p-ope-rfy (noet ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining wadis within 75' of lakeshore _____PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule _____$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) _____After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation _____$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule Zip. (month/year) c'Sjn 4*.'^ ' « ** 5 * Kb % REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350', labels and plat map (you must obtain tMs list, labels and map fi-om Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of aoplicant(s) if not current owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff* for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wsh notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff* will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff*:._____ Date APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff* time not covered by ori^al fee payment) and/or unusiial expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her foiowledge. Applicant's signature Date ■/>?-/? > OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the Ci^ offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Plaiming Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning OfiSce of this change prior to the meeting. H os fO lO ^ iH H flL • Ulo o*2 &oa. UJoc CNJ o a UJz 0 M </) C/11 o 5 •J to CNJ 10m 10 r-l CM W to M CM DC I Oo (H < I o r-l CO to e CO o to o o UJ ►- M b. O Z OS Z O O > u. K >0 < o %o ca M U. X -J0. o o < UJ O h- cOo > UJ M 0£u a. u •M c V iH o a o CM CM to CM IN (t4 rH I o •H CO to za O UJ UJ^ a a ^ a a M < <z u. u. H to CO to to z Q CO CO CO M M -J ^ z z M *;5 HO O to > M O tM to >CNJ U < to > CM <A CM 5 Z CM < « Z to O .J U CM Z • • ^0 o o o rC CM CO M Zzss UJ C9 to CM •iz U M 2tJrv z •H U. Z iH UJ • *J S to S O' M r-l CO CO CM to O M 10 M M M Z Zz < UJ z •J X o z M < CO t- M Z Z O UJ z o < z z < to CM tototo > N < >0 CQ X Uo < to H O > z z u CMI*"** ZOO CM O CO CO CM Z Z Z tU UJ to O O O CM ^ Z I »J < < N. M •H Z UJ I < O Z •H to Ci UJ« n iO < *J CO o Mto o o u ri O' to Z to Q to M • < to > ^ < CO Z o UJ r-i O o 6 Ot;; CM CM CO t1 to UJ CM Z I O N O rC < 1-4 I o •-4 CO to o CO e to o g ® - ^ O' Q to Z Z to < to O UJ •i «J z u < *1 Z UJ < . UJ Z M «• 0 U. >- o < Z z r4 z zUl o o CO Sj z z < UJ UJ to N O CQ « > O O o < Z Z ri Z < M ^ O O U CM Z M CO CO Z to Z HO CM Z Z < Z I O Z H Z Cf f-4 n «i I tu < o r4 to to r-l CO H to O Q Ho» to to to z < H:ss3 r-l < r4 Z o o CO O « a CM z CM S I o H Z 1-4 A r4 I r4 to O r4 A H to O Ul CO CO to HZ to CO UJ o. MHZ Z lO ^ ^ cSSiac o•J u z < A H >• > < Z Z A N Z Z O > UJ UJ H < T1 H Z Oo €l Ozz z a UJ < > X Z < UJ UJ Z z o z z Az o UJ "< <zz Z Ul Si Z O H c •/ .. r<O lA fn ^ ^ H Ma. • tu o o fiCoa. UJ o Vi N>To o o i/i a q:o HV) UJ NfH O UJ H M U) UJ oc CK Z S S O O O (A V)9 •J tu 90 O CM *J I mJ M •H H I UJ Mo: A CA Q «to O f iH O O 10 . . O O H ^ f-l O O H < “ H H rl Z i > o U) X u <ta o H TtaVi > Vi § p u CO su CO UJ UJu. Hz OS •i oo < H £ A A H O UJ e A M o «J H •J H rH o A O H H A A Z e > o So < O u H A e A H O ^A £ O'A O'Z A O' Z X > A A O' A 'T O £A A a A A ^ Q <A Z A eg < A A A CJ < < A A A A H A z u •J A A ^ ^Z A A A A MAX A Z A A A A O A O A O A A Q A O Q> X H SB K O UJ ea < “-P001 o: CL UJ 0. > o H QC Z flu 3 O . U OJ -J - _ .i.ri*“gsH S U •• U £ H CO .J I UJ A H < O M Z H•-4 e O < ^ H e N H A > ^ > Ir^rH r4 I A A O •J A A -J A 10 e Q < H < a H X rH O' e A iHro o g<gM A A e«o o O C9 •-« <N > < _ _ _ _ _ _ _tu I A 3 Z M < < > iH «J A M UJ •H A 4>rH O «J «J eg O O eg 3 9 A rH O O lO e Q O O N eg > eg < iH X eg *j I H •H Z rH I e #H 10 10 o A fH Hi O < A *J . A M < -,“*5 MAN A «J A > A O < Q a iH A UJ UJ mJX p UJ . ac A Ul A UJ X > UJ A h- £ CJ A UJ A A M A O O XM A UJ UJ X O' O' N 'To A Ul eg rH O A O A<r o eg I •H A A A eg o mJ o A M UJ UJ U U N M rH X rH UJ Ul A U A M fH O' A A A A A O ArH O A A A O A M S A a eg Aeg A A A A A A A A O eg -I < o •j -j M fH A O < K A A rH O A A Ao o fH >s A O eg u N M_ _ _ _ _ _ •H X A A *J £iH UJ UJ «J I A A M <o :x H iH A A UJ < ^ ^ A A N r-l ^ H <r A fH iu UJ fH < A o n A fH A O A A A < UA O H A eg U U O I .J «J O N M H fH A A M ^ £ > O UJ iH O Q •! A A fH A IH AH X A O A A A O H -J e A A > H A H U UJ H < O o A § A 5 A Ul A A £ Q Q < A O a £ UJ << > N, A < Ui A UJ A £ O Z X < A A < Z A O h- Ul A £ a < A AAA Aa Q < Ntu 5 .. c Ho ro CM e H H A. • lUo o 0 A. Ul 01 m H O O AC O K1 M CM I N rH H I Kl o o H CO CM fO O UJ C/> Mz z Ul UJ M > UJ f-4 fO OC lA Q lA M M (/) Z A. UJ M Hz z UJ BL CO O Z K S X 4A < H o M > CM Z CO CM UJ UJ O Z S Z < < M X to z to UJ CM 0 I 0 r* UJ •H Z fH I to « “a e 0 CM to o U U 0 0 sso o -J «io o > > -J n UJ UJ •H 0 O' •J to ^ Ul M 0 !Si 0 Ul < ut e CM CM e IIee 0) 0 0 0 Ul CM Q n H •HZ UJ U *1 0 Z O CM Z 0 U K Z O 0 S“?0 I z < o H -J •H O 0 O CM X O* “5 U 0 O M 0 C S! 00 O 0z »- t-o •I 0 •H o o O 0 0 <2 0o CM 0 oz 0 > 0 O H U •H Z h- M U. O Z _ 0 Z 0 H z g CM Z 0 < O Z1 O < Z _ 0 K Z < •H 0 < 0 O 0 •H Z H I Z < 0 e O 0 •H o 0 0 M O 0 fH 0 e < X 0 0 iH _ 0 0 X 0 0-11^0 zo H 0 Z O 0 0 Q H Z.2 0 0 0 O 0 0 CM ^ O 0 O O • V Ij z rl 0 0 3 H M H H e e 0 Z 0 Z 0 ^ 0 O NZ 0 z o > 0 e 0 0^0 0 O Z Z U N Z O O 0 0 . Z 0 K 0 0 O H H O Z O 0 CM Z 10 0 0 N X H 0 0 0 H O O I Z Z 0 0 0 O 0 Z Z A* iH Z Z 0 CM 0 O Z Z o H rH O' to Z 0 O 0 zM •H 0 CM Z az h- CM 0 e 0 0 M 'J* X to z 0 0 CM A 1 A h* 0 •H •H I 0 O 0 0 o A CM 0 O Z ^X 0 O' 0 u 0 M 0 0 0 ^ Z M 0 •J 0 X M O Z Z Z ?si X Z 0 0 MO 0 M 0 N Z > 0 >- 0 O < O O CM Z iH e o O 0 CM O #H Z 0 ZCM S 1 O K Z •H A •H I e •H e 0 A CO o 0 O 0z M 0 0 M M 0 0 z z 0 0 X S 1-4 O O' 0 0 0 O 0 0 oz _ o oM M 55o a Sfj 0 0 A Z o o 0 CM O fH Z ^1 I O f'. z iH A H Ie iH O 'O O' A O 0 O On 0 *M O' Z 0 0 0 Z X 0 0 '‘Sou z _ S Z X S S 0 O^ Z z 0 CA V. 'ff*o %3 a t?| 0 «J »iS 0 H 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 Z CM Z Z I A O f'* O Z ^ — •H Z I H 0 Z O A 0 0 Z o _ A O 0 0 O X to CM 0 0 0 O Z O > Z A 0 O 0 A Z X 0 >_0 M Z U Z U o 0 u h- 0 A Z A 5 zozz 0 z r A < Z A Z 0 Z 0 UJ Z X X 0 A o o O Z A 0 Z M 0 0 CM > I 0 N X •H 0 H I 0 O 0 0 •H A CM 0 O z O 0 0 3 Z A 0 0 A 3 2^ 0 n X o A Z 0 n n 0 iH > O' M 0 Z 0 A 0 H 0 Z < 0 tsl 0 >- •H 0 CM X 0 Z Z X A A 0 Z A A Z 0 0 O H 0 Z 0 Z X o Z X < Z X 0 z Z O H O' •H O Z A tn z M 0 0 CM > I 0 O 0 Z Z 0 O 0 0 Z X 0 z 0 X zM ■’iA 0 O' 0 Z 0 A 0 h* Z Z 0 z fH 0 A A > X rC 0 0 1 Z O X 0 0 0 0 H O O 0 ^ <A Z e tM fH O 0 A > A CM 0 O Z z z fH CM 0 Z Z X A A < Z A A Z 0 < 0 > V Z 0 0 Z 0 z O Z X Z O H 0*0 M* AA 132 A Z C^ N 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 M H X 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 CvJ A 3 I A Z h* 0 r4 H I A 0 Z O 0 0 M X o u A CM M 0 O Z soz fH 0 O' 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 Z Z « ^ A 0 0 S 0 S as5 Z CM X CM e o o fH fH 0 CM A 0 X E|M 0 0 0 0 0 Z M 0 Z o 0z 0 0 0 0 I A > ^ 9 C•H 0 X fH U I e A •H A O 0 0 e 0 A e u 0 o M X 0 o Z00 0 0 M ►- A X O 0 U ^ial z 0 A Z X Z A A 0 z 0 <A Z 0 > V>0 > 0 0 Z 0 Z X Z 0 z X 0 S S X Z X 0 H *z o H Z A A 0 V 0 X 0 0 e 0 ® <0 0 H ^ 0 O' CM A 0 r4 Z X X _ 0 IH M A 0 0 Z 0 0 0 CM X X X O 1 O H H Z h. Z 0 0 _ Z •H A Z Z Z X fH z z 5 I O 0O o o s t:•HO A 0 0 > >• N O' z z e > A O 0 0 0 0 0 o o O O' X “5 z A A 0 Z A A Z 0 0 0 >• V Z 0 0 z 0 Z X Z O H 20 Nl IKI 6r Offjcia City of R*1A On* R*1B One LR*1A on* 26SS.42 «C$ ---- ■" ^«'» 2 * t- ••'•l? ?;.. - (i«) A ¥f' S (I) Nts sncn icn oroi u tMiCAro tfi lavtiCv »*cr m \ IS a I ------laj—_j Bo^ > (0 tf [ liVJ^nar rjjif (Bwcyo«c»c to lor ). &c I. ifti#€io«u vm fius vACArn siom yc m.ict •d Cor^siiA riJt fb»7»>tfA ♦'Conwc* THAT fUf 10 U1 M, a.C 0. M1CA«. »»CATto stfm Aun \ Iz) t <o " *^1 If > 1 s *^ m *(»)lM .n "q .n hrg^1 f • a:S '*•irj jff ;^V> ; a . .'t « 06) 07) lAO 1* ;q 0 c 2lo noU 06) (20) ^ m Bonestroo Rosene itrn Anderlik& |\J I Associates Engineers & Architects March 9.1999 Elizabeth VanZomcrcn * City Planncr/Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Carriage Hill Subdivision File No. 139-2467 Bonestroo. Rosene. AnderUk AssocUtes. Inc. is in Affirmitive ActlQr\/£qusl Opportunity fmpteyer Prlnclptfs: Otto a Bonestroo. PE. • Josepti C AnderUk. P.E. • Miryin L Sorvala. PB • Richard E. Turner PE. • GJerrn R. Cook. PE • Robert G. Schunicht. PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. • Robert W. Rosene. P.E. and Susan M. Eberlin. CPA.. Senior Consultants Associice Prirtefpi/s: Howifd A. Sanford. PE. • Keith A. Gordon. PE. • Robert R. Pfefferle. PE. • Richard W. Foster. PC • David O. Loskota. PE. • Robert C Russek, A.I.A. • Mark A. Hanson. PC • Michael T. Rauimann. PC • Ted K.Flcrd. PE. • Kenneth R Arrderson. PC • Mark R. Rolfs. PC • Sidney P Wllllamioa PX. LS. • Robert F. Kotsmiih • Agnes M. Ring • Michael P. Rau. PC • Allan Rick Schmidt. PC Officer. St. Paul. Rochester. Wllimar and St. Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl Website: wwwi)onestfQo.com Dear Liz: We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed six lot Carriage Hill subdivision. The site is located west of Brown Road South (C.R. 146), east of Willow Drive and south of the Webber Hills neighborhood in the northwest quarter of Section 10. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1. Access: Tlie proposed access location for Carriage Lane appears acceptable. We recommend that Carnage L^e be constructed to a 24-foot paved width in accordance with City standards for a private street serving 3 to 6 units. We also recommend that Carriage Lane be an urban street section with concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer. The City should review and determine whether the 150-foot driveway across Outlot B to Lot 2 is acceptable. Final plans should include a typical street section for both Carriage Lane and the driveway to Lot 1. Access to Lot 1 along King Street is adjacent to an existing dnveway serving the property to the north. Does it make sense to have two separate driveways side by side or would a combined access be more appropriate? The proposed plan for the access to Lot 1 appears to require some extensive grading. Construction easements or retaining walls may be required to construct this access. It also appears that the construction of this access will impact the wetland and wetland buffer. Plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) for their review. Geotechnical recommendations and street design should be provided for our review. 2. Grading; A grading and erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any grading, particularly along the wetland and ponding area. Additional erosion control will be needed during construction of the houses and septic systems. 3. Drainage: As stated in # I above, we recommend that storm sewer should be consuucted to route storm flows from CHP - the street to the pond. Based on the drainage calculations submitted, it appears that the existing 12-inch CMP under CDTVUAttfeJ Willow Drive will remain in place. The CMP will act in conjunction with the proposed 15-inch CMP. We pip^ recommend that all storm pipes be RCP rather than CMP. We recommend that the pond have an outlet structure that provides 1-foot of sldmming to remove floatables and debris. Some Type of permanent erosion control measures should be installed downstream from the pond to prevent sedimentation in French Lake. We have attached 'ilVl'forCftdl additional comments from our water resources department regarding water quantity and quality. 4. Utilities: City sewer exists just south of the site on Willow Drive. The City should review and determine whether they intend to ever provide sewer service to this area. 5. Easements: Final platting should include 33 feet of dedicated right-of-way for C.R. 146 and 66 feet of dedicated right-of-way for Willow Drive. Does Outlot A have any impact on access to the lot south of Willow Drive? The drainage and utility easements shown appear to be acceptable. Additional easements may be required if sanitary sewer is provided. 6. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we will prepare an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. 2335 West Highway 36 - St. Paul, MIM 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 - Fax; 651-636-1311 Please contact me at 651-6044863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, . BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Attachments Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono Memo ^ 1 Bonestnoo ^gSltosene Anderilk& |\|| Associates Enyinctrt 4 AitMt«<tt Project Name: Carriage Hill Development To: Tom Kellogg From: Heather A. Olson Client: CityofOrono File No: 139gen - #2467 Date: March 3, 1999 Re: Stormwater quantity and quality review Remarks: General This review concerns the Carriage Hill development as detailed in the plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services Inc. dated 2/19/99. This site is located east of Willow Drive In the northwest quarter of section 10. The site consists of six 2+ acre lots located on approximately 45 acres. The site will drain west under Willow Drive into the wetland surrounding French LaKe. Water Quality The proximity of this development to both French Lake and the adjacent wetlands, increases the irnportance of erosion* control and treatment for the runoff from this site. We offer the following recommendations. 1. Heavy-duty silt fencing should be installed on each lot along the construction limits. All silt fencing shall remain intact until there is vegetation established on the entire site. 2. The rear yard drainage from lots 1,2,3 and 4 drain into the adjacent wetland without being treated. A 26’ wetland buffer has been indicated on the plan, please submit a typical section and description for City staff to review. 3. There is some concern for the drainfield/seplic system located on Lot 5 block 1. It appears to encroach upon the proposed water quality ponding. It is recommended that the ordinance for the 75 ’ offset be enforced for this ponding area. The discharge from this drainfield will impact the nutrient loading within the proposed pond which outlets into French Lake. The soil borings should also be submitted for city staff to review. t Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Assoclates ___________________________ _____ 2335 West Highway 36 # St. Paul, MN 55113# Phone:651-636-4600# Fax:651-636-1311 Memo 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene VH AnderiOc& |\j| Associates 4. Excavation of temporary sedimentation ponds and the use of BMPs should be In place during each lot construction to reduce the erosion to the adjacent wetland. * . t . Water Quantity The topography of this site prevents the entire site to drain to a single ponding area. We offer the following recommendations: 1. It is recommended that the impervious surfaces, (house, driveway, and yard) and any land disturbed during construction be routed to drain Into the street and into the proposed ponding area. This will reduce the amount of untreated runoff draining directly to the adjacent wetland. 2. The 100-year HWL for the proposed pond does not seem to provide sufficient freeboard for Willow Road. The elevation of the low point on Willow Road should be established and submitted to city staff. 3. The cover for the outlet structure under Willow Road should be evaluated. 4. It Is difficult to determine from the grading plan whether a maintenance bench above the pond NWL Is being provided. At a minimum there should be one provided around inlets, outlets, and at any point where dredging operations might occur. 5. The ponding area should also have a 10:1 aquatic bench at the ponds NWL. The ponding area Illustrated on the plans does not appear to have this feature. 6. The Installation of an Emergency Over Flow (E.O.F.) Is recommended for this pond. The E.O.F. should provide overland drainage for the pond during storms that exceed the 100-year event, and or when the outlet structure becomes obstructed. The EOF should protect adjacent homes and roadways. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderllk and Associates 2335 West Highway 36 # St. Paul, MN 55113# Phone:651-636-4600# Fax:651-636-1311 TO; FROM; DATE; Liz Veui Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager March 4,1999 SUBJECT; Septic Review for Application #2467,Carriage Hill - Subdivision The proposed six lot subdivision requires the use of on-site sewage treatment systems. Site evaluation/design has been completed for primary and alternate drainfield sites on each lot. Due to frozen gound conditions, steiff can ’t verify the accuracy of the soil borings or recommend approval of the subdivision at this time. The information submitted by Westwood Professional Services identifies two drainfield sites on each property meeting all City and State standards. Staff approval of the septic plan will be granted once the City can verify the soil information and complete system design information is submitted by Westwood. The stormwater drainage pond on the southwest comer of the property must be i designed to meet a 55 foot setback from the property line to the highwater mark. The setback is required to eliminate future setback conflicts when septic system upgrades are required on adjoining properties. Based on the above information, staff recommends approval of the application on the condition that the soil information is verified by Staff and all final septic system design infonnation is provided. The city requires the drainfield sites to be fenced off prior to any grading or land alteration. .* . City ofOrono Minnesota J iSirtY / PirtXIV MUSA BOUNDARY CURRENT MUSA Plltl NavairaTcitst Lakan ’onlawa (lUaaLfins 4-144(0 Fait 11 OroM ScMaMmrfal Fade (RoaoLiinS 4-1449) PiftlU Kackacn/(RnoLfinS 4-14-10) Fait IV llcnkkaitia (IUioLfll35 4-1440) FaitV CheryChaMfFwtUkOtttn (lUaoLfills 4-1440) Fait VI . Mda. BtallaAiMM Ua^. Fcmdala . (lUaoLilllF 11-2141) FartVn . CovBVllMdlSIbtedMa •(RaoLflll? 11-2141) FartVni •CnMBa/- (lUaoLilllt 2-2147) Fart DC Fttlaao Fropert/(Raolfllll T4147) FartX Ki|k«ni7l2CociUorWcft (IUaoLi207 54141) FMtXl HiMn/llConldarCail (IUaoLf2417 54141) FartXn HocdiSbaa^ScaltkFlM aUMLf]2ll 54441) Fart XIII 650BfmXaadNortk (PUMLi32ll 544-fl) • Fart XIV Falfwi/HUlsAddldoa (IUmL flail 54441) F«tXV UagLak^FImkifTiin*(RaaoL flail 544-fl) Part XVI SttHtBa/ *(lUaolfllll 1-1042) F«ixvn OroooSawarFlaolFrapcrt/(RaoLflMI 104541) FartXVXa Hanks FaapcdF (KaooLflMI 104541) FartXZX HortkUogLaka iRcMLfim 1041-M) Fart XX Loaf Laka CoiM/Oak (RaaoL flTfl 1041-N) F«tXXX EartLeafLikf (RaaoL flTfl n04l-ff) FartXXn OomOS cImHs (RaaoL fITfl 1041-94) FartXXin roiXMit (RaaoL flTfl 104144) Fart XXIV Webber HiUs (ReaoL flTfl 10-21-94) Fart XXV EdgcmdHBb (RaaoL flTfl 1041-94) Fart XXVI OiockettiFikl (RaaoL flTfl 1041-94) Fvtxxvn FoBhat (RaaoL flTfl 1041-94) FartXXVm BajrddiadfartwDod (RaaoLflTfl 1041-94) ' pmxxdc OreooScboMlocki/Arf&a .•(RaaoLfITfl 1041-94} FvtXXX DtOaMnFrafNdF OlaaoLflTfl 1041-94) ' rrtpttcd MUSA AddUUa rutXXXi *AnK]t(d lo at/ of Lm| Likt (hadlN) I ■I Dy\HLGRE^ SHARDLGW ANOXTBAJ^T: ORONO. MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Oonosiroo Hosono Andorllk d Asiodafes REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING MAY \ 0 1999 CITY Uh UnuiNU__________ Date: May 7,1999 Item No.: Department Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaf!ron;^V Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Extend LR-lC-1 Moratorium or Allow to Expire Ordinance #175, 2nd Series, adopted May 11, 1998 established a 190-day moratorium on the granting of applications which would make use of the LR-lC-1 50% increase in dwelling unit density. That moratorium was extended on November 9, 1998 and will expire May 15, 1999 unless Council renews it on May 10. The moratorium can be extended an additional 180 days, which would yield a total moratorium length of 18 months, the maximum allowed by statute. Earlier this year Council reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation and information supplied by staff, and concluded that the impact of the proposed LR-lC-1 50% density credit elimination was minimal due to the number of properties affected. Council at that time chose to take no action on the amendment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt a 6-month extension to the moratorium established in Ordinance #180, 2nd Series per the attached Ordinance, or choose to let the current moratorium expire. ORDINANCE U , 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING AN INTERIM MORATORIUM ON THE GRANTING OF CREDITS ALLOWING A 50% INCREASE IN DWELLING UNIT DENSITY IN THE LR-lC-1 DISTRICT The City Council of Orono does ordain: SECTION 1. Statement of Policy. The purpose of Orono Municipal Code Chapter 10 is to provide for the orderly development of residential properties so as not to unreasonably conflict with the current residential character of the City. The City is concerned that its current regulations in Section 10.26, Subd. 3 related to a credit allowing a 50% increase in dwelling unit density and the LR-lC-1 zoning district are not adequate to ensure this. The City Council determined that time was needed to conduct a study to determine whether new regulations are needed; and, if so, to develop and adopt new regulations. SECTION 2. Extension of Interim Moratorium. To allow' time for the study defined in Section 1 the City Council imposed a 190 day moratorium pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 469.355, Subdivision 4, on the granting of applications pursuant to Section 10.26, Subd. 3 in the LR-lC-1 District. The initial moratorium w'as set to expire on Tuesday, November 17,1998. Because the City had not yet completed the study which may result in ordinance revisions, it was necessary to extend the moratorium 'o May 15, 1999, which was done via Ordinance No. 180 Second Series on November 9,1998. Because the City has not yet completed the study which may result in ordinance revisions, it is necessary to additionally extend the moratorium to November 11, 1999. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon publication. Adopted by the City Council of Orono on this 10th day of May, 1999, by a vote of aves and navs. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATl'EST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk COUNCIL MEETINQ MAY 1 0 1999 CU Y Ol* UHUJMU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 10, 1999 ITEM NO.: J ^ Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Schedule Assessment Hearing for Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Project The third bid opening for this project was recently held and only one bid was received. The first two times the project was bid were for a directionally bored gravity flow sewer system. These bids were higher than expected and were both rejected. This third bid included both a gravity flow system and grinder pump system option. The gravity system bid was very high, and the -ost savings from a grinder pump system were not great enough for the residents to justify having an individual grinder pump to maintain. The bid for a gravity flow system was $252,962.00, and the bid for the grinder pump system was $161,987.80. The residents would like to have a gravity flow sewer system. The contractor suggested that if the sewer could be installed in the yards behind the houses the project could be completed at a lower cost. An option to install the sewer in the back yards was considered in the original feasibility study, but was rejected because of concerns about tree loss. The residents said that they are now interested in having the sewer installed in the back yard and will accept the loss of some trees. A site meeting was held with the contractor and most of the residents. A revised pipe alignment through the back yards was laid oui and is acceptable to the residents. This revised alignment, located directly behind the houses, will be a combination of open cut installation and directional boring and will be shorter than the original feasibility study alignment. The contractor, GL Construction of Medina, is the same contractor that constructed the Heritage/Shoreline project last year. This is a very good contractor and was excellent in working with the neighborhood residents. We are very satisfied with the quality of their work. GL Construction was also the only bidder the last two times that Edgewood Hills was bid. The contract specifications reference a MNDOT provision for "value engineering" for this project. This concept allows the contractor to propose alternate methods for project construction that are more cost effective. The revised sewer alignment developed by the contractor and neighborhood residents is a better and more cost-effective solution for this project. Also, the residents are comfortable with the contractor and are supportive of the revised alignment. We have obtained a value engineering proposal from GL Construction for the revised alignment. We have compared this proposal to other bid prices we have received and believe the proposal is a fair and reasonable price for the project. The construction cost for the revised gravity flow system was $158,620. This project has also been discussed with the City Attorney and is acceptable to him. We are recommending that, after the assessment hearing is held, that the contract for this project be awarded to GL Construction with a value engineering change order to construct the revised sewer alignment through the back yards. We are recommending approval of the attached resolutions to schedule the assessment hearing for the regularity scheduled Council meeting on June 14th for this project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve resolution declaring cost to be assessed and ordering preparation of proposed assessment for Edgewood Hills Area Sanitary sewer Motion to approve resolution scheduling hearing for June 14, 1999 on proposed assessment for Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer. A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARA . ION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR EDGEWOOD HILLS AREA SANITARY SEWER WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the improvement of sanitary sewer in the Edgewood Hills area and the estimated contract price for such improvement is $158,620 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $59,980 so that the total estimated cost of the improvement will be $218,600, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO, MINNESOTA; 1. 2. 3. 4. The total cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $218,600. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2000, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum fi-om the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the clerk's office for public inspection. The Clerk shall upon completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held May 10, 1999. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT EDGEWOOD HILLS AREA SANITARY SEWER WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on May 10, 1999, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the Orono Orchards area sanitary sewer, and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in the Clerk's office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 14th day of June, 1999 in the Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement v.ill be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City, except that no interest may be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at anytime thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with the interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged througli December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted.by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held May 10, 1999. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk COUNCIL meetinq REQ west for council action MAY 1 0 1999 C\VY Oh' UliOlMO DATE: May 10, 1999 ITEM NO.: ) Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Schedule Public Hearing for Weber Hills Sanitary Sewer Project A feasibility study has been completed and two neighborhood meetings were held to discuss this project. At the first meeting, a gravity sewer system with a municipal lift station was discussed at an estimated cost of approximately $29,000 per unit. The residents objected to the high costs for this project and the major disruption to the neighborhood resulting from project construction. In response to the resident concerns, costs for a grinder pump system were developed. Each resident would be required to purchase, install and maintain their own grinder pump for this system. The estimated cost for a grinder pump system is $16,500 per unit. This cost estimate also includes a $5,000 per unit allowance for property owners to purchase their own grinder pump stations. A second neighborhood meeting was held and the residents favored the grinder system option. A neighborhood survey was conducted and approximately 75% of the residents favored a grinder pump sewer system. Several residents were gone for the winter and did not respond to the survey. There are 37 properties in the project area. Twenty-six properties have nonconforming septic systems. Replacement options are limited, with many properties having only one conforming site available, and no future replacement site in case of failure of the new mound system Six properties have newer conforming mound systems, and two properties have older conforming trench systems. Several of the property owners, with conforming septic systems, have expressed possible interest in being excluded from the project. The neighborhood residents have requested that the City begin the formal public hearing process for a year 2000 sewer project. This will be a fully assessed project. Conducting the public hearing this summer will allow for project surveying and design this year, for an early year 2000 bid opening. We are recommending approval of the attached resolutions ordering and accepting the feasibility study, and scheduling a public hearing at the regularly scheduled June 28th City Council meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve resolution ordering the preparation of a feasibility study for the Weber Hills Sanitary Sewer Project. FOX ^jLt'er \ » XT0O \A/m\l 1A1LL5 5fU/£t PlLoTfcT (j2ji!^ /^j?pn.Ess njum W w/ ny^ cIP-CL^ A MPM • 6?M fp|U\AVM<J • SEPT^C $ysTtN\ r SC/iLE ' 1--------------1c; iocf zdo \oo Mu-n\) siT£ 'ayP) '.E’^acH Lot nS(iOi\i[L^s AM ^MIIIAl A<MW A ftEpL/iCfiuT ?|7E nyPK-OL Mi7UKA^S)T^5 , SA^WfviP'M SPfvvE Cop, \ Fon luU(ASM^M\iJU C'KhLJ^j c•<r tMi E PT\c ^YSl li\n 3ll .E5S f lliO 000 /~s 7.0 6o'V 119..n^ .03^> T\i(7 lOiS: Lott o::i(?<VO 0-l«V( ^ns / MfU/ 4 fvt(;tiluo “ U>S^ U>1 ) ^ ^ Cofe y m^diSUtX m SSBS^ Feasibility Report Webber ffills Sanitary Sewer Improvements Orono, Minnesota April, 1999 File No. 139102 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene ^5 Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects April 30. 1999 Bonestroo. Rosene. Andertik and Associates, tnc. Is an Affirmative Action/Equat Opportunity Employer Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. RE. • Joseph C. Anderlik. PE • Marvin L Sorvata. PE • Glenn R. Cook. P.E. • Robert G. Schunlchi. RE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. • Robert W. Rosene. P.E.. Richard E. Turner. RE. and Susan M. Eberlin. CP.A.. Senior Consultants Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PE. • Keith A. Gordon. PE. • Robert R. Pfefferle. PE. • Richard W Foster, PE. • David O Loskota. PE. • Robert C. Russek. A I.A. • Mark A. Hanson. PE. • Michael T. Rautmann. RE. • Ted iCFleld. P£. • Kenneth P. Anderson. P£. • Mark R. Rolfs. PJL • Sidney P. WtUiamson. RE.. LS. • Robert F. Kotsmith • Agnes M Ring • Allan Rick Schnildt. P£. Offices' St. Paul. Rochester. Wltimar and St. Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl Website: wwwbonestroo com Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Re: Feasibility Report Webber HUls Sanitary Sewer Extension OurFUeNo. 139102 Dear Mayor and Council: Enclosed, for your review is our preliminary report on the Sanitary Sewer Extension for the Webber Hills area in Orono. This development is located west of South Brown Road, east of Willow Drive and south of Fox Street. This report describes the sanitary sewer improvements necessary to provide municipal sanHary sewer service to this area. Cost estimates for the proposed improvements are presented in the Appendices. We would be pleased to discuss this report further with the City Council or City staff at any mutually convenient time. Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Tom P. Kellogg TPK:kf I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Ml... :fa /f/U. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Date: April 3.1998 Reg. No. 9451 2335 West Highway 36 - St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651-636*4600 ■ Fax: 651-636 1311 Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents I. Introduction Figure 1 - Location Plan n. Summary and Recommendations m.Sanitary Sewer Figure 2 -Webber Hills-Gravity Option Figure 3 -Webber Hills-Grinder Option IV. Cost Analysis Table 1- Cost Summary V. Project Schedule Appendix A -Webber Hills Cost Estimates, Gravity and Grinder Options Webber Hills Sanitary Sewer Improvements Page No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 9. 10. I. Introduction City staff has requested this report to determine the feasibility of constructing sanitary sewer improvements for the Webber Hills area, as shown on Figure 1. A portion of the neighborhood is located within the shore'“ind area making it difficult for some property owners to meet the 3-foct separation between the seasonal water table and their septic system. Alternate septic sites are not available on some properties due to lot size and existing topography. The City of Orono conducted a study in 1994 to determine if there were neighborhoods in Orono which should be provided with municipal sewer rather than have the neighborhoods upgrade their existing septic systems. Based on the results of that study, the City of Orono r ,uested approval from the Metropolitan Council to extend sewer to ten Orono neighborhoods. The Webber Hills area was one of the ten neighborhoods recently included in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary expansion. The proximity to she reland, lot size and topography are the primary factors suggesting municipal sewer service is preferable to long term septic system usage. It is estimated that 35% of the existin septic systems in the Webber Hills neighborhood are either failing or non-conforming. Oo Over the past two summers the City has completed sewer projects to serve five of the ten neighborhoods. Webber Hills is one of the next areas on the City ’s priority list for sanitary sewer. This report describes the sanitary improvements required to completely serve the Webber Hills neighborhood. The proposed sanitary sewer improvements are presented on Figures 2 and 3. The costs of the proposed improvements are presented in the appendices and a cost summary is presented in the Cost Analysis section. Webber Hills Sanitary Sewer Improvements Bonestroo ORONO. MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS \139102\133102R01.DWC 1/2/S3 FIGURE 1 Rosene Anderlik & |\|| Associates Engineers & ArchHects COMM. 139102 Ei;. II. Summary and Recommendations The construction of sanitary sewer to serve the Webber Hills area is feasible from an engineering standpoint. The project is necessary because of the relatively small lot sizes and potential pollution problems. The capital cost as well as operation and maintenance costs have been considered in determining that the project is cost effective. The cost of these improvements are interrelated and should be assigned equitably between all properties. The following reconunei dations are presented for consideration by the Orono City Council: 1. 2. 3. That this Report be adopted as the guide for installation of saiiitary sewer in the Webber Hills area. That the City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the proposed project prior to the public hearing. That a public hearing be held on the proposed improvements. The total estimated project cost of $610,000 should be incorporated in the public notice. There are 37 units proposed to be assessed for the trunk and lateral improvements. Webber Hills Sanitary Sewer Improvements III. Sanitary Sewer The proposed sanitary sewer for the Webber Hills area i'.. ith.-v/n on F» t, 2 rc ’icw of the project site indicates the routes shown on the figures are a-. ** < * < standpoint. Figure 2 shows a gravity sewer system. The proposed gravity sewer tvould be const: j: • a. -.,v in the roadway on Webber Hills Road and Shevlin Drive using ih-: traditional open ct‘ Sewer installation along Willow Drive will also be installed using the open cut method r.:.d V \ of the road as much as possible. The sewer segments across Lots 3,4, 10,1 a and Lots 1 and 'I is shown on Figure 2 will be directionally bored to minimize restoration to residential propertie: >iil flows will be directed to a lift station located near the intersection of W»l; ;w and Shevlin Drives. The lift station would pump flows southerly along Willow Drive to an exis..ug gravity manhole located approximately 2400 feet south of Shevlin Drive. Mainline pipe will be 8-inches in diameter and either HDPE or PVC depending on the method of installation. Sewer services to each home will be 4-inches in diameter. Services will be extended to the property line. The actual connection between the home and the sewer stub will be the property owner's responsibility. The construction of a gravity sewer will require complete reconstruction of Shevlin Drive, Webber Hills Road and portions of Willow Drive. Disturbed street areas will be restored to the original width with 1 V2 inches of bitununous wear course, 2 inches of bituminous base course, 10 inches of aggregate base and geotextile stabilization fabric. All driveways will be restored to match existing surfacing. Disturbed boulevard areas will be sodded or reseeded. A pressure sewer system (Figure 3) was considered as an alternative to the gravity sewer design. The pressure system would utilize a common forcemain installed along the edge of the existing roads. The pressure system would outlet at the same existing manhole as the proposed gravity system. Sewer services would be extended to each property, terminating with a curb stop (shut ofO at the property line. A residential grinder station that would pump flows from the home to the forcemain along the street would serve each property. Each resident would be responsible for all costs associated with the installation, maintenance and operation of the grinder station. The residents would also bear the cost for the installation of the service line between the grinder station and the Webber Hills Sanitary Sewer Improvements sewer stub at the property line. Restoration of driveways and boulevards would be completed as previously described for the gravity sewer system. The installation of the pressure sewer system would be less intrusive than the gravity system. The common forcemain would not be as deep as the gravity system and would therefore minimize street reconstruction costs. Residential access could b- maintained on all roads during construction. The overall project costs would be substantially Ic ver if the pressure system is installed. The City has indicated that a majority of Webber Hills re.^ .dents favor the pressure sewer system over the gravity sewer system. The project will be constructed on pubb ; and private property. The alignments selected and shown on Figure 2 will require permanent Jid temporai7 easements to allow for construction. The alignments shown on Figure 3 would require temporary construction easements. Detailed cost estimates for both of the sanitary sewer improvement options are presented in the Appendices. Webber Hills Sanitary Sewer Improvements IV. Cost Analysis Detailed cost estimates for the proposed improvements are presented in the appendices. These costs include a 5 percent contingency, a 20 percent allowance for design, inspection, legal, and administration costs, and a 5 percent allowance for capitalized interest and bonding costs during construction. The estimated costs shown in this report are based on 1999 unit prices and can be related to the ENR Construction Cost Index for March, 1999 of 5,986. A summary of the estimated costs for the proposed improvements is presented in Table 1. Table 1. Summary Area # of Services Figure #Estimated Cost Assessment Webber Hills Gravity Sewer 37 2 $1,068,000 $28,900 Webber Hiils-Pressure Sewer 37 3 $610,000 $16,500 The cost estimates do not include easement costs that could be incurred on the project. It is recommended that the sewer construction costs be assessed uniformly over the area to be served, based on the number of services to each property. The assessments shown above reflect this recommendation. Webber Hills Sanitary Sewer Improvements V. Project Schedule Date To be determined To be determined To be determined January, 2 IM January, 2 •III February, 2 nil March, 2 ilili April, 2 III May, 2 III September, 2 •III Event Publish and mail notice of public hearing Public hearing Order preparation of plans and specifications Plans and specifications complete Advertise for bids Open bids Assessment hearing Award construction contract Begin construction Complete construction Webber Hilts Sanitary Sewer Improvements APPENDICES Webber Hills Sanitary Sewer Improvements WEBBER HILLS SANITARY SEWER-GRAVITY OPTION PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 1999______________ ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE EST. QUANTITY EST. cost; 8" DIP sanitary sewer 8" PVC, SDR 35,0’-8’ deep 8‘ PVC, SDR 35,8'-10’ deep 8“ PVC, SDR 35,10’-12* deep 8" PVC, SDR 35,12'-14’ deep 8* PVC, SDR 35,14’-16' deep 8’ PVC, SDR 26,16’-18’ deep 8“ PVC, SDR 26,18’-20’ deep 8’ PVC, SDR 26, 20’-22’ deep 8* PVC, SDR 26. 22’-24’ deep 8* PVC, SDR 26, 24’-26' deep 8' PVC, SDR 26,26*-28’ deep 8* PVC, SDR 26, 28’-30' deep 8* PVC. SDR 28. 30’-32’ deep Directional bore 8* HDPE Standard 4’ dia. MH MH overdepth Outside drop for MH 8’’ X 4* wye 4' PVC service riser pipe 4‘ PVC service pipe Improved pipe foundation Televise sewer Mechanical trench compaction Submersible pump lift station 4' HDPE forcemaln Connect to existing manhole Clear and grub Mobilization Silt fence Bituminous surface removal Common excavation Geotextile fabric Class 5 aggregate base, 100% crushed Type 31 bituminous base course Type 41 bituminous wear course Bituminous material for tack ccat Repair driveways Sod with 4" topsoil Seeding v topsoil, mulch, and fertilizer Bituminous street patching __________ LF 30.00 LF 26.00 LF 28.00 LF 30.00 LF 32.00 LF 34.00 LF 36.00 LF 38.00 LF 43.00 LF 46.00 LF 50.00 LF 55.00 LF 60.00 LF 65.00 LF 50.00 EA 1,700.00 LF 100.00 LF 100.00 EA 75.00 LF 18.00 LF 18.00 LF 1.00 LF 1.00 LF .1.00 EA 70,000.00 LF 20.00 EA 500.00 LS 3,000.00 LS 5,000.00 LF 3.00 SY 2.00 CY 7.00 SY 1.50 TN 13.00 TN 32.00 TN 35.00 GL 1.50 EA 750.00 SY 2.50 AC 3,000.00 SY 10.00 30 400 2,100 410 380 310 255 245 205 80 140 110 40 40 1,150 25 160 20 37 200 1,100 10,000 5.895 9,395 1 2,400 1 1 1 2.500 14,300 5,000 15,200 9.300 1,725 1.300 750 37 3.500 1 50 $900 10,400 58.800 12,300 12,160 10,540 9,180 9,310 8,815 3,680 7.000 6,050 2,400 2,600 57.500 42.500 16,000 2.000 2,775 3,600 19.800 10,000 5,895 9,395 70.000 48.000 500 3.000 5.000 7,500 28,600 35.000 22.800 120,900 55,200 45.500 1,125 27,750 8,750 3.000 500 Estimated Construction Cost +5% Contingencies +20% Legal, Engineering and Administration +5% Capitalized Interest and Bonding Total Estimated Cost $806,725 40,336 $847,061 169,412 $1,016,474 50,824 $1,067,297 WEBBER HILLS SANITARY SEWER - RESIDENTIAL GRINDER OPTION PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 1999 ITEM • • ■ .i • • UNIT • *- ; UNIT • EST. V^: PRIc'E ' QUANTlify EST.’ cost! 1 1/2’ HOPE service pipe 1 1/2" HOPE service pipe-directional bore 3* HOPE forcemain 6" HOPE forcemain HOPE service tee Curb stop Cleanout manhole Repair driveways Bituminous street patching Connect to existing manhole Erosion control fence Mobilization Bituminous surface removal Sod with 4 “ topsoil Seeding w/topsoil, mulch, and fertilizer Residential grinder station___________ LF LF LF LF EA EA EA EA SY EA LF LS SY SY AC EA 10.00 20.00 14.00 2200 50.00 200 00 3.000. 00 750.00 10.00 1.000. 00 2.50 5,000 00 2.00 2.50 3.000. 00 5.000. 00 600 1.300 3.300 3,600 37 37 14 19 600 1 4,000 1 600 10,000 1.5 37 $6,000 26,000 46.200 79.200 1,850 7,400 42.000 14,250 6,000 1,000 10.000 5,000 1,200 25,000 4,500 185,000 Estimated Construction Cost +5% Contingencies +20% Legal, Engineering and Administration +5% Capitalized Interest and Bonding Total Estimated Cost $460,600 2J.030 $483,630 96,726 $580,356 29,018 $609,374 A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF MUNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER TO SERVE THE WEBBER HILLS AREA WHEREAS, the project area was included in the recent MUSA expansion for sanitary sewer services, a neighborhood informational meeting was held to discuss the project, and project area residents have submitted a letter indicating interest in obtaining sanitary sewer; and WHEREAS, the City En^eer has provided preliminary cost estimates for a sanitary sewer extension; however, additional information is needed in order to establish the feasibility of such a project; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that municipal sanitary sewer trunks and/or laterals be constructed to serve the Orono Orchards area and that the benefitted property(s) be assessed for all of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota that the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study, and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a pr Jiminaiy way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective, and feasible and whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 10th day of May, 1999. ATTEST;Gavtiel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk A RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON WEBBER HILLS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No.of the Council adopted May 10, 1999, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer in reference to the Webber Hills sanitary sewer improvement, and this report was received by the Council on May 10, 1999, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counal of Orono, The Council will consider the installation of such sanitary sewer improvement in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $610,000. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 28th day of June, 1999 in the Council Chambers, 2750 Kelley Parkway, at 7:00 p.m. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of iMay, 1999. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk ♦ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING MAY 1 0 1999 Cl I y OH OHO/VC DATE: May 10. 1999 ITEM NO.= /X Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer’s Report Item Description: Advertise for Bids Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-Sac Plans and specifications have been completed for the MNDOT Cooperative Agreement project for the closure of the TH12/Stubbs Bay Road intersection. We are requesting Council authorization to advertise for bids for this project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to authorize advertising for bids for the MNDOT Cooperative Agreement project for the closure of the TH12/Smbbs Bay Road intersection. COUNCIL MEET«»Jl®ST FOR COtJNCIL ACTION MAY 1 0 1999 DATE: May 10, 1999 CITY OF UhUi>JO ITEM NO •= 13 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Keviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Request for Payment #7, Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation We have reviewed the information submitted by the City’s engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL /XV. 1 ION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Payment ffl, to Shank Constructors, Brooklyn Park MN in the amount of $56,244.00. • BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK ©6516361311 05/05/99 15:18 B :02/05 N0:193 SonestroQ RoMne Owner: City of Qrono. 2750 Kelly Pkwy. Qrono. MN SS323^Q6fi iffjrttfu^cfutftMContTactor: Shank Constructors. Inc., 3501 8Sth Ave N. Brooklyn Park. MN 55445 Anderfiki Ajsodatef Date: May 5. 1999 For Period: April 2. 1999 to April 30.1999 Request No; REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NAVARRE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY RENOVATION BRA FILE NO. 13997 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order • Addition 3 Change Order • Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 5% 9 Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. S S 13,138.00 S s s $ s s s s 636,600 649,738 633.3S8 0.00 633.338 31,668 601,690 345.446 36^244 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved by Contractor: SHANK CONSTRUCTORS, INC. Approved by Owner: CITY OF ORONO Specified Contract Completion Date: 5.15.99 Date: K.\139\1399AW0R0\REQUEST7.WB2 BONESTROO ROSENE ANOERLIK © 6516361311 05/05/99 15:18 0 :03/05 MO:193 No. Item CoDtract Unit Quantity Total pnce for the renovation of the Navanc Water Treatment Facility, including demolition, process equipment (by base bid manufacturers, as described in Pan III of this Proposal) plumbing. HV.AC, electrical work, controls and instrumentation, process piping, painting, and all other items shown, specified, or imp'ied to place the facility into full operation for the LUMP SUM of: LS Breakdown of above: Mobilization & Div. 1 Demo • Lab. Demo - Mat. Concrete Bottom • Lab. Concrete Bottom • Mat. Div. 5 - Lab. Div. 5 • Mat Div 8 • Lab. Div. 8 - Mat. Softening Equip • Ext. Softening Equip • Int. Filter Equip • Ext. Filter E-^rp- Int Piping & Valves Interior Filter Equip - Lab Filter Equip - Mat. Softening Equip - Lab. Softening Equip • Mat. Filter Media • Lab. Filter Media • Mat. Softening Media • Lab. 23 Softening Media • Mat. 24 Chemical Feed - Lab 25 Chemical Feed - Mat. 26 Pumps • Lab. 27 Pumps - Mat. 28 Blower - Lab. 29 Blower - Mai 30 Piping 8l Valves • Lab. 31 Piping Sc Valves • Mat. I n •0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 IS 19 20 21 **■) Unit Quantity Current Price to Date Quantity Amount to Data 636,600.00 37.894.00 100%37,894 12,944.00 100*/o 12,944 11,850.00 100%11,850 10.121.00 100%10,121 10,360.00 100%10,360 493.00 100%493 1,173 00 100%1,173 1,190.00 100%100%1,190.00 4,9Sf'00 100%100%4,989.00 5,200 00 100%6054 5.200 9,000.00 100%9,000 13,500 00 100%6054 13.500 31,000.00 100%31,000 13,600 00 100%75%13,600 6,600.00 85%85%5,610 15,692.00 100%15,692 53,793.00 100%53,793 2,352.00 100%2,352 17,038 00 100%17,038 4,200.00 100%4,200 28.375.00 100%28,375 563.00 100*/.563 18.554.00 10054 18.554 7,352.00 100%40%7,352 8,393.00 100%8,393 7,500.00 100%7,500 16,827.00 100%16,827 5.987.00 10054 3,987 6,75700 10054 6.757 26,922.00 100%26,922 87,181.00 100%87.181 K A139M 3997\WOROIREQUEST7.WB2 •BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK © 6516361311 05/05/99 15:18 0 :04/05 NO:193 32 Hvac 33 Electrical 34 Steel 35 Welding 36 Crinding 37 Paint Ceiling 3S Consolidation Grouting Total Work Completed To Date 16,200.00 100%16,200 134.000 00 90%'9%120,600 1.200.00 60%700 5,500.00 86%4,751 2,300.00 91.7%2,109 5,500.00 90%61%4.950 7,638.00 100%100%7.638 <33^SI KA13»\139«7\WORD\REQUESn. WB2 BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK © 6516361311 05/05/99 15:18 0 :05/05 PJ0:193 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS Owner CITY OF ORONO Project No. FUe No. Contractor SHANK CONSTRUCTORS. INC. CHANGE ORDERS No.Date OeaciiDtloB Amount 1 03/04/99 Refer to Change Order No. 1 5,500.00 2 04/07/99 Refer to Change Order No. 2 7.63800 3 Totil ChiDse Orders $13,138.00 PAYMENT SUMMARY 1 Start I0/'31/98 79.3(3 4,174 58.969 10/31/98 12/01/98 19.149 5,182 103.644 3 12/01/98 01/05/99 86.430 9.731 146,770 4 01'U5/99 01'28-99 165,139 18,423 368.453 5 01/28/99 03/05/99 59.759 21,568 431,357 6 03/05/99 0402/99 135.657 28.708 574.154 7 8 9 10 Material on Hand 0.00 Total PavTTienl to Date $545,446 Original Co.itract $636,600 00 Rciainage. Payment No. 7 $31,668 Change Orders 5.500.00 Total Amount Earned S577.I14 Revised Contract $642,100.00 KA139M 399r\WORCnREQUEST7 WB2 COUNCIL MEETING may 1 0 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; May 10, 1999 CITY OF OhONO ITEM NO.: Department Approyal: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Repon Item Description: Reject Bid for Head Sanitary Sewer Project Only one bid was received for this project and Uiis bid exceeded the estimated cost for this project. We have contacted the property owners and they have decided to rebid the project with a completion date of next summer to allow the contractors a longer time for project installation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to reject bid from M&P Inc. for Head Sanitary Sewer project CITY of ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address; 2750 Kelley Pai[kway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Douglas and Martha Head 1616 W 22nd St. Minneapolis MN 55405 Dear Mr, & Mrs. Head; On March 17, we opened bids for the sewer forcemain project to serve your Lake Minnetonka property. The only bid received was from M & P Utilities of Hamel Minnesota and is for $43,789.50. This bid does not include the $5,000 allowance for tht; grinder station that was included in the original cost estimate. With this bid, plus the $5,000 grinder station credit and the other associated costs, the total estimated project cost would be $64,780. The contractor stated that they were extremely busy this year because of the large amount of directional boring work for utility companijs. They also had some co.ncems about boat traffic in the channel interfering with their ability to monitor the boring progress from their boat. The contractor suggested that being able to complete this work early in the spring when they could get out on the ice may be easier. We have discussed »his issue and suggest that rebidding this project with two alternates may result in more contractor interest and favorable bid prices. Alternate 1 would be to rebid this project for completion this summer, to see if more contractors will submit bids. Alternate 2 would be to allow the contractors until next year to complete the project. This would allow completion of the project when there is ice on the channel and monitoring of the boring may be easier. This may result in lower bid prices as the contractors would have more flexibility- in their scheduling, and may also be interested in securing work for next year. Please review this information and provide us direction on how you would like us to proceed with this project. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please contact myself at 612-249-4621, or Tom Kellogg, Bonestroo Engineers at 651-604-4863 should you have any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, Greg Gappa Director of Public Services Copy Tom Kellogg, Bonestroo Engineers Telephone (612) 47y‘13S7 • FAX 473-0510 )6e 0. ring ilitv ^ m Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & |\|| AssociatesEngineers & ArchitectsApril 28, 1999Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Orono 2750 Kelly Pkwy PO Box 66 Ciystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Citj' of Orono Head Sewer Service BRA File No. 139-98-806 Honorable Mayor and City Council: Bonettroo. Rosene. AnderUk end Associates. Inc. Is an Affirmance Action/equal Opportunity EmployerOtto G. Bonejtroo. P.E. . Joseph C. Anderlik. PE • Marvin L. Sorvala. PE. .Glenn R. Cook. PE. • Robert G. Schunlcnt. PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. • 0Robert W. Rosene. PE.. Richard E, Turner. PE and SusartM. Eberlin. C.P.A.. Senior ConsultantsCordon. PE. . Robert R. Pfefferle. PE. .Ml h T D • Bobert C. Russek. A.I.A. • Mark A. Hanson. PE. •Sidn/*pVn'^*"’*""oe^’ * P Anderson. PE. . Mark R. Rolfs. PE. •Sidney P Williamson. PE.. t.S.. Robert P Kotsmith • Ajnes lA. Ring . Allan Rick Schrfirdt. PE.Offices: St. Paul. Rochester. Wilimar and St. Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. WlVC'e&s/fr www.bonestfoo comMrk j 0 |,?J9 S/i * 4 i* • , • * • • ' « There were a total of 1 bid. The following summarizes the results of the 1 bid received. Contractor Low M & P Utilities. Inc.Bid Amount $43,795.00 The low bidder on the project wns M & P Utilities. Inc. with a base bid of $43 795 00 M & P Utilities ZVrt W * cost nlrrMr. yrojer, ^ """"" ">‘ Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. My direct dial phone number is (65 1 ) 604- Yours veiy truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. /O'tH Tom Kellogg Enclosures TPK:jms Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 - 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1311 Item Units Qty MAP, Inc Unit Prlc3 Total Base Bid 4* HOPE. SDR 11, directional bore LF 1150.00 S26.09 $30,003.50rHOPE. SOR11 LF 1150.00 58.50 $7,475.00Connect forcemaln to existing manhole EA 1.00 $600.00 $800.00 Remove existing bituminous surface SY 60.00 $9.50 $570.00 Bituminous street patch SY 6C.00 $45.00 $2,700.00Sod with 4* topsoil SY 500.00 $3.00 $1,500.00 Erosion control fence LF 300.00 $2.50 $750.00Total Base Bid $43,798.50 Contractor Name and Address:M & P, Inc Department Approval:Administrator Revie^ved:Agenda Section:Name Ron Moorse City Adminisntitor’sTitle City Administrator ReportItem Description: Appointment of Planning Commission Vice Chair REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING MAY 1 0 1999 rv UF UHUNU DATE: Mays, 1999 ITEM NO: /U Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:m Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Resolution Amending the Program for Deferment of Special Assessments for Persons 65 Years of Age or Older Attachment: Proposed Resolution The City has established a program for deferment of special assessments for persons 65 years of age or older. At this time, the income guidelines for deferment have been updated to conform with 1999 Section 8 Income Limits. The Applicatiop for Deferral of Special Assessments is also being updated to reflect the correct income guidelines. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution amending the program for deferment of special assessments for persons 65 years of age or older, and approve the updating of the deferral application. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PROGRAM FOR DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono is the official governing body of the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute Section 435.193 through Section 425.195 authorizes the City of Orono, upon proper application, to defer the payment of special assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older on January 1 of the payment year and for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments; and WHEREAS, Section 425.194 authorizes the municipality to establish an interest rate to be added to the deferred assessment which shall be payable in addition to the deferred assessment; and that Orono had adopted such a program under Ordinance 2.62 (1984 recodified). Resolution 1093 (dated November 13, 1979), Resolution 1779 (dated June 10, 1985), Resolution 2864 (dated August 27, 1990) and Resolution No. 3894 (dated April 28, 1997). WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the deferral of assessments should be granted to any person otherwise qualified who makes proper application to the City of Orono on forms prescribed by the County Assessor of Hennepin County and by the Orono City Council and for whom the City Council determines that it would be a hardship to make the payments, based upon the following criteria: NUMBER OF PERSONS MAXIMUM INCOME IN HOUSEHOLD 1 Person $33,450 2 Person $38,250 3 Person $43,000 4 Person $47,800 5 Person $51,600 6 Person $55,450 7 Person $59,250 8 Person $63,100 Page 1 of2 Assets not including homesteaded property of $25,000, income and assets as defined in Hennepin County's Utility Connection Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO IN A REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older and for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments, be deferred for a period of time not to exceed five years subject to the aforementioned financial criteria, upon submission of an appropriate application signed by the qualified person, and which may upon expiration of initial or any subsequent renewal deferments may be reapplied for, and subject to the applicant meeting all the necessary criteria upon reapplication be deferred for an additional period not to exceed 5 years; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the right of deferment is automatically terminated under Section 435.195 if: 1. 2. 3. 4. The owner dies and the spouse is not otherwise eligible; The property or any part thereof is sold, transferred or subdivided; The property should lose its homestead status; or If for any reason the City determines that there would be no hardship to require immediate or partial payment. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held May 10, 1999. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 2 of 2 COUNCIL MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MAY 1 0 1999 DATE; CITY OH OHO j^U ITEM NO = n Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name Tom Kuehn Title Finance Director Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Part-Time Police Officer Jeffrey D. Johnson - PERA Resolution Attachment; Resolution declaring that the part-time position held by Jeffrey D. Johnson is that of a police officer. On March 22, 1999, Council authorized the police chief to change the position of Jeffrey D. Johnson from a full-time CSO to a part-time police officer, starting at an hourly rate of $12.62. The change was to be effective when the new full-time CSO was trained, which has been accomplished. The starting date for Jeff as a part-time officer is April 19, 1999. As the City intends that its part-time officers be included in the police and fire fund of PERA we are required to adopt a resolution to that effect. 1 have included a copy of the standard resolution for your review. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to appoint Jeffrey D. Johnson to the position of part-time police officer, effective April 19, 1999, at a starting rate of $12.62 per hour, and to adopt the attached resolution establishing his eligibility for coverage in the PERA Police and Fire Fund. A RESOLUTION TO DECLARE THAT THE PART-TIME POSITION HELD BY JEFFREY D. JOHNSON IS THAT OF A POLICE OFFICER WHEREAS, that Public Employees Retirement Association Police and Fire Fund excludes part-time police officers unless a resolution is adopted by the governing body to establish eligibility for coverage in the Police and Fire Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota that effective April 19,1999, the position Jeffrey D. Johnson holds is that of a police officer as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 353.64, Subdivision 2, pursuant to which said employee shall become a member of the Public Employees Retirement Association Police and Fire Fund. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held May 10,1999. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vce, City Clerk COUNCIL m \ 0 W99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ClTY OF OHUwU DATE: May 7, 1999 ITEM NO: / % Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Authorization to Hire a Part-Time Police Clerk The Police Department's full-time Police Records Specialist/Secretary is currently on leave due to a work-related injury (inflammation in her forearm) that prevents her from performing the duties of her position. She has been on leave since March 25. It is not clear when she will be able to return. This leaves one full-time and one part-time office support staff person. The part-time staff person is not able to change her work schedule to work additional hours. Because the summer season is the Police Department's busiest period, it is necessary to provide additional staffing on a schedule of 16 hours per week. Ideally, the additional person would have some police office background. The Police Department will contact other departments in the area to determine if they have part-time office staff who would be interested in working additional hours for the Orono Police Department. The Department will also check with temp agencies to find a person with some police office background. If neither of these options is successful, we will need to advertise for a part-time clerical position. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to authorize staff to hire a part-time police clerk. 1 I L. COUNCIL MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MAY 1 0 1999 CITY OF Uhuivu Date: May 7,1999 Item No: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title:Chief of Police Item Description: HIRING OF PART-TIME COMMUNITY SERVICE OFHCER Exhibits:None DISCUSSION The position for a part-time Community Service Officer has become available with Matt Hagen's resignation. Hillary Lebowitz, who is a law enforcement student, has submitted an application for the position and is available for the needed time period. Because of her interest, and a need to have this position filled, I am recommending Hillary Lebowitz be hired as a part- time Community Service Officer. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Request Hillary Lebowitz be hired as a part-time Community Service Officer at the pay rate of $8.53 per hour with no benefits or PERA membership based on the $5100 maximum earnings stipulation, effective May 11, 1999. i COUNCIL MEETING MAY 1 0 1999 CITY OF UHuiYJU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; May 7,1999 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Title City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval There are no licenses. 26 Apr 1999 Check Register Mon 10:37 AM City of Orono Check Check Check Number Employee Name Date Amount Check Number 045922 045922 JOHNSON, JEFFREY 22-Apr-99 600.49 Totals Check Number 045922 600.49 Grand Total 600.49 Page 1 COUNCIL MEETING MAY 1 0 1999 Cl 1Y Ut-' U^iU^y^u 5 May 1999 Wed 10:30 AM Check Number Employee Name Check Number 045924 045924 JOHNSON. MARY ANN Totals Check Number 045924 Check Number 045925 045925 HASEMAN, CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 045925 Check Register City of Orono Page 1 Check Number 045926 045926 MOCRSC. RONALD J. Totals Check Number 045926 Check Number 045927 045927 VEC. LINDA S. Totals Check Number 045927 Check Numloer 045928 045928 KUEHN, THOMAS M. Totals Check Number 045928 Check Number 045929 045929 OLSON. RONALD J. Totals Check Number 045929 Check Number 045930 045930 PETTIT. SANDRA K. Totals Check Number 045930 Check Number 045931 045931 ANDERSON. BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 045931 Check Number 045932 045932 BOBZIEN. SUE A. Totals Check Number 045932 Check Date 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 Check Amount 669.47 669.47 730.61 730.61 1.578.85 1.578.85 1.092.29 1.092.29 1.005.84 1.005.84 4.36 4.36 737.15 737.15 818.06 818.06 725.09 725.09 5 May 1999 Wed 10:30 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 045933 045933 BORIS, SCOTT W Totals Check Nun±er 045933 Check Number 045934 045934 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. Totals Check Number 045934 Check Number 045935 045935 CHESWICK. GARY B. Totals Check Number 045935 Check Number 045936 045936 CORNICK, JAMES L. Totals Check Number 045936 Check Number 045937 045937 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C. Totals Check Number 045937 Check Number 045938 045938 ERICKSON. KURT R Totals Check Number 045938 Check Number 045939 045939 PARNIOK, CORREY L. Totals Check Number 045939 Check Number 045940 045940 FISCHENICH. DAN T. Totals Check Number 045940 Check Number 045941 045941 FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K Totals Check Number 045941 Check Number 045942 Check Date 05-May-99 OS-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05«May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 ppriA O Check Amount 1.156.76 1.156.76 688.42 688.42 1.484.73 1.484.73 1,598.22 1,598.22 1,224.24 1,224.24 1,316.36 1,316.36 1,362.32 1,362.32 1,176.83 1,176.83 1.206.31 1.206.31 5 Kay 1999 Wed 10:30 AM Check !«umber Employee Name Check Number 045951 045951 TOMCZYK, MARK W. Totals Chec< Number 045951 Check Register City of Orono Page 4 Check Number 045952 045952 WITTKE. ANTHONY A. Totals Check Nurnier 045952 Check Number 045953 C45953 HAGEN. MATTr.CW D. Totals Check N\:rber 045953 Check Number 045954 045954 HOECHST, ROBYN A. Totals Check Number 045954 Check Number 045955 045955 BOTTENBBRG, WENDY C. Totals Check Number 045955 Qieck Number 045956 045956 GAFFRON. MICHAEL P. Totals Check Number 045956 Check Number 045957 045957 GAPPA. GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 045957 Check Number 045958 Check Date 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 Check Amount 1.258.74 1.258.74 343.16 343.16 113.56 113.56 570.09 570.09 369.40 369.40 1.161.19 1.161.19 1.565.93 1.565.93 045958 OMAN. LYLE E. Totals Check Nu.mber 045958 05-May-99 248.55 248.55 Check Number 045959 045959 VANG. BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 045959 05-May-99 993.71 993.71 Check Number 045960 5 May 1999 Wed 10:30 AM Check Number Employee Name Check Number 045960 045960 HECKMAN^ STEPHEN J. Totals Check Number 045960 Check Number 045961 045961 WEINBERGER. PAUL E. Totals Check Number 045961 Check Register City of Orono Page 5 Check Number 045962 045962 BRINKHAUS. JOiCI F. Totals Check Number 045962 Check Humber 045963 04F963 OEBAERE. DONALD L. Totals Check Number 045963 Check Number 045964 045964 GREGORY. JAMES D. Totals CheCM. Number 045964 Check Number 045965 045965 HANSEN. STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 045965 Check Number 045966 045966 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G. Totals Check Number 045966 Check Number 045967 045967 OBRIEN. RANDY L. Totals Check Number 045967 Check Number 045968 045968 PALMER. GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 045968 Check Nun^r 045969 Check Date 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 Check Amount 70.19 70.19 802.42 802.42 1.115.06 1.115.06 907.35 907.35 704.28 704.28 941.07 941.07 733.53 733.53 450.96 450.96 642.41 642.41 5 May 1999 Wed 10:30 M Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 045969 045969 RATHBUN, BARRY J. Totals Check Number 045969 Check Number 045970 045970 SKREEN, DALE S. Totals Check Number 045970 Check Number 045971 045971 ABRAHAMSON, FRED W. Totals Check Number 045971 Check Number 045972 C45972 ALLEN, MICHAEL J. Totals Check Number 045972 Check Number 045973 C45973 BLAIR, JANIS A. Totals Check Number 045973 Check Number 045974 045974 MCINTYRE, WILLIAM E. Totals Check Hunger 045974 Check Number 045975 045975 OAS, DANIEL 0. Totals Check Number 045975 Check Number 045976 045976 PETERSON, JACK W. Totals Check Number 045976 Check Number 045977 045977 ROSS, JOHN A. Totals Check Number 045977 Check Number 045970 Check Date 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 05-May-99 Page 6 Check Amount 907.95 907.95 742.45 742.45 236.54 236.54 54.18 54.18 125.42 125.42 85.81 85.81 315.07 315.07 517.11 517.11 75.72 75.72 [J 5 May 1999 ffed 10:30 AM Check Number Employee Name Check Regiater City of Orono Page 7 Check Date Check Amount Check Number 04S978 045978 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD E. Totals Check Number 045978 05-May-99 1.094.11 1.094.11 Grand Total 43.273.75 5 May 1999 Hed 10:30 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 8 Payroll User Initials vi.'dnesday S Msy 1999 10:30 AM Start 10:30 AM Finish Buffer Name Check Reg Records Read Records Selected Number of Pages 55 55 e Selected by Check Date Equal To 05-May-99 Sorted by Check Number Totals No Page Breaks 5 May 1999 Wed 11x46 AN Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 58810 58810 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 05-May-99 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Totals Check Number 58810 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Number 58811 FIRST national BANK OF LAKES 58811 58811 58811 05-May-99 05-May-99 OS-May-99 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Totals Check Number 58811 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Check Number 58812 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. 58812 05-May-99 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. Totals Check Number 58812 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. Check Number 58813 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 58813 05-May-99 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Totals Check Number 58813 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Check Number 58814 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 58814 05-May-99 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Totals Check Number 58814 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Check Number 58815 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT 58815 05-May-99 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Totals Check Number 58815 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Check Number 58816 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 58816 05-May-99 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Totals Check Number 58816 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Check Number 58817 MN MUTUAL LIFE 58817 05-May-99 MN MUTUAL LIFE Totals Check Number 58817 MN MUTUAL LIFE Check Number 58818 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP 58818 05-May-99 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP Totals Check Number 58818 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP Transaction Amount 7,339.00 7,339.00 3.376.90 3.378.90 8,288.25 15,046.05 800.68 800.68 275.00 275.00 0.00 0.00 179.51 179.51 3,523.92 3,523.92 703.00 703.00 227.00 227.00 Page 1 Comments SAVINGS W/H a TRANSFERRED FICA 6 MEDICARE W/H FICA,MEDCR CITY SHARE FEDERAL WITHHOLDING DEFERRED COMP W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H UNION DUES WH SKREEN #0010755723 STATE TAX W/K DEFERRED COMP W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H I 5 May 1999 Wed 11:46 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 58818 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP Check Number 58819 PEBSCO/OBRA S8819 05-May-99 PEBSCO/OBRA Totals Check Number 58819 PEBSCO/OBRA Check Number 58820 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 58820 05-May-99 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS Totals Check Number 58820 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS Check Number 58821 PERA 58821 58821 05-May-99 05-May-99 PERA PERA Totals Check Number 58821 PERA Check Number 58822 UNITED WAY 58822 05-May-99 UNITED WAY Totals Check Number 58822 UNITED WAY Grand Total Transaction Amount 227.12 227.12 2,421.50 2,421.50 4,606.65 6,129.30 10,735.95 31.00 31.00 41,509.73 Page 2 Comments OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H USCM DEFERRED COMP W/H PERA EMPLOYEE W/H PERA CITY SHARE CHARITY DONATIONS W/H i i » 6 May 1999 Thu 9:37 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 045900 045980 PETERSON, BARBARA A. Totals Check Number 045980 Check Number 045981 045981 MOORSE, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 045981 Check Number 045982 045982 FLINT. RICHARD Totals Check Number 045982 Check Number 045983 045983 JABBOUR. GABRIEL B. Totals Check Number 045983 Check Number 045984 045984 KELLEY. CHARLES Totals Check Number 045984 Check Number 045985 045985 SANSEVERE. ROBERT K. Totals Check Number 045985 Grand Total Check Date lO-May-99 lO-May-99 lO-May-99 lO-May-99 lO-May-99 lO-May-99 Page 1 Check Amount 269.36 269.36 184.70 184.70 269.36 269.36 323.22 323.22 269.36 269.36 269.36 269.36 1.585.36 M 7 May 1999 Fri 12:33 PM Check Number Check Number 58824 58824 58824 Check Register City of Orono Page 1 Date Name 58824 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 05-May-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 05-May-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE lO-May-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/PSLLEVUE Totals Check Number 58824 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE Check Number 56825 allegra print & imaging ChecK Number 58S30 CHEMSEARCH 58830 07-May-99 CHEMSEARCH Totals Check Number 58830 CHEMSEARCH Check Number 58832 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58832 lO-May-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Transaction Amount 17.04 17.04 451.70 485.78 111.02 111.02 Comments ON CALL PHONE - WS ON CALL PHONE - WS PHONE CHARGES 58825 lO-May-99 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 134.19 BUSINESS CARDS Totals Check Number 58825 ALLEGRA PRINT k IMAGING 134.19 Check Number 58826 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ 58826 07-May-99 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ 33.23 PHONE - WECKM\N 58826 07-May-99 AT t T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ 138.99 WIRLESS PHONE SERVICE 58626 07-May-99 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ 15.46 WIRLESS PHONE SERVICE 58826 07-May-99 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ 15.46 WIRLESS PHONE SERVICE Totals Check Number 58826 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ 203.14 Check Number 58827 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 58827 05-May-99 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 34.72 HOT DOGS. CHEESBURGER 58827 lO-May-99 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 36.48 HAMB, CHUCKWAGENS Totals Check Number 58827 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 71.20 Check Number 58826 BUDGET PRINTING 58628 07-May-99 BUDGET PRINTING 25.88 ENGRAVED SIGN 58828 07-May-99 BUDGET PRINTING 49.92 GC RESERVATION BOOKS 58828 07-May-99 BUDGET PRINTING 90.53 PLAQUE 58826 07-May-99 BUDGET PRINTING 75.17 DOG VIOLATION HANGERS 58828 07-May-9?BUDGET PRINTING 5.17 SKIPPING CHRGS Totals Check Number 58828 BUDGET PRINTING 246.67 Check Number 58829 BUSINESS FORMS & ACCOUNTING 58829 lO-May-99 BUSINESS FORMS k ACCOUNTING 182.64 W/METBR BOOK FORMS Totals Check Number 58829 BUSINESS FORMS k ACCOUNTING 182.64 URINAL SCREENS 1,962.56 11179 CAR MAINT ? May 1999 Frl 12:33 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Check Number Qieck Number Date Name 58832 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Check Number 58834 CITYVIBW PLUMBING & HEATING 58834 05-May-99 CITYVIEW PLUMBING & HEATINS Totals Check Number 58834 CITYVIEW PLUMBING k HEATING Check Number 58835 CLASSIFIEDS 58835 lO-May-99 CLASSIFIEDS Totals Check Number 58835 CLASSIFIEDS Check Number 58836 CRAGUN'S RESORT AND CONF CENTR 58836 07-May-99 CRAGUN'S RESORT AND CONF CENTR Totals Check Number 58836 CRAGUN'S RESORT AND CONF CENTR Check Number 58837 CUSHMAN MOTOR COMPANY INC. 58837 07-May-99 CUSHMAN MOTOR COMPANY INC. Totals Check Number • 58837 CUSHMAN MOTOR COMPANY INC. Check Number 58338 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 58838 05-May-99 DAf DISTRIBUTING CO. Totals aicck Number 58838 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Check Number 58839 DCA 58839 lO-May-99 DCA Transaction Amount 79.50 79.50 78.90 78.90 337.22 337.22 12.78 12.78 110.00 110.00 Comments 58832 lO-May-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 38.03 O O CAR MAINT 58832 lO-May-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORB AUTO 1,045.47 0177 CAR MAINT 58832 lC-M.ay-99 CHTJNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 70.66 0180 CA.7 VAINT 58832 lO-May-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORB AUTO 230.25 #181 CAR MAINT 58832 10-May-99 CHUIiKS LA.KESHORE AUTO 56.20 #176 CAR MAINT 58832 lO-May-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 114.08 #181 CAR MAINT 58832 lO-May-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 307.01 #178 CAR MAINT 58832 lO-May-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 67.83 #181 CAR MAINT 58832 lO-May-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 76.01 #179 CAR MAINT 58832 lO-May-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 24.95 #175 CAR MAINT 58832 lO-May-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 55.55 #183 CAR MAINT 58832 lO-May-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 62.45 #170 CAR MAI!T Totals Check Number 58832 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 4,111.05 Check Number 58833 CITY OF WAYZATA 58833 07-May-99 CITY 01? WAYZATA 9,735.00 FIRE PROTECT10^ Totals Check Number 58833 CITY 01? WAYZATA 9,735.00 REPAIRS - TOX ALERT SECRETARY AD 4/10/99 MCMA CONFERENCE-MOORSB CONNECTOR BEER FOR RESALE •t 488.99 FLEX SPD-MAY-2-99 7 May 1999 Fri 12:33 PM Check Number Check Number 58047 Dace Name Check Register City of Orono 50847 FARNIOK, CORREY lO-May-99 FARNIOK, CORREY Totals Check Number 58847 FARNIOK, CORREY Transaction Amount 21.51 21.51 Page 4 Comments RESERVE MARATHON Check Number 58048 FAST SIGNS 58840 07-May-99 Totals Check Nuffl>er FAST SIGNS 58840 FAST SIGNS 310.98 310.98 DIRECTION SIGNS Check Number 58849 58849 FISCHER, CHRIS 05-May-99 Totals Check Number FISCHER, CHRIS 58849 FISCHER, CHRIS Check Number 58850 FORTIS BENEFITS 40.00 40.00 MEALS - VERBAL JUDO TRNG 58850 58850 lO-May-99 lO-May-99 Totals Check Number FORTIS BENEFITS FORTIS BENEFITS 50850 FORTIS BENEFITS 35.69 728.05 763.74 LIFE INS/CR LIFE INS Check Number 58051 FRONTIER ELECTRIC COMPANY 58851 07-May-99 Totals Check Number FRONTIER ELECTRIC COMPANY 58851 FRONTIER ELECTRIC CCMP^JJY 495.00 495.00 REP BALLASTS-LRKNQ LOT LQ Check Number 58852 G fc K SERVICES 58852 07-May-99 Totals Check Number G i K SERVICES 58852 G & K SERVICES 55.11 55.11 MAT SERVICE Check Number 58053 GALL'S INC. 58853 58853 05-May-99 07-May-99 Totals Check Number GALL'S INC, GALL'S INC, 5885.1 GALL'S INC 121.97 63.96 185.93 RAINCOAT, CAP TRAFFIC BACKER, BULBS Check Number 58854 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN 58854 07-May-99 Totals Check Number GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN 58054 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN 130.00 130.00 MEMBERSHIP KUEKN Check Number 58855 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN 58855 05-May-99 Totals Check Number HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN 58855 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN 549.75 549.75 JAIL CHARGES 7 May 1939 Fri 12:33 FM Check Numcer Check Numher 58356 Check Register City of Orono Date Name 58856 J H LARSON COMPANY 05-yay-99 J H LARSON COMPANY Totals Check Number 58856 J H LARSON CCMPATiY Cl-.eck Number 58857 58857 JON WRIGHT 07-May-99 Totals Check Number JON WRIGHT 58857 JON WRIGHT Check Number 58858 58858 KELLER, GREGORY LAW OFFICE lO-May-99 Totals Check Number KELLER, GREGORY LAW OFFICE 58068 KELLER. GREGORY LAW OFFICE Check Number 58859 58359 58859 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA 07-May-99 O'* ‘lay-99 Totals Check Number KENNETH N. POTTS, PA KENNETH N. POTTS, PA 58859 KEN!;ETH N. POTTS, PA Zheck Number 58860 58860 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 07-May-99 Totals Check Number KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 58860 KTiSTOM SIGNALS INC Check Number 58861 58861 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS lO-May-99 Totals Check Number LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS 58861 LAK-ESHORE WEEKLY NEWS Check Number 58862 58862 MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING 07-May-99 Totals Check Number MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING 58862 nCLEOD USA PUBLISHING Check Number 58863 58863 58863 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER 07-May-99 07-May-99 Totals Check Number MET COL7JCIL ErJVIROrJME.TrAL SER MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENl'AL SER 58863 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER Check Number 58864 58864 MINI^EAPOLIS COM k TECH COLLEGE 07-May-99 MINNEAPOLIS COM k TECH COLLEGE Transaction Amount 93.41 93.41 133.13 133.13 50.00 50.00 105.00 2.291.66 2.396.66 85.50 85.50 104.00 104.00 6.66 6.66 3,150.00 -31.50 3,118.50 150.00 Page 5 Comments FLOURECSENT BULBS PRINT FRAMING REVIEW TOWING AGREEMNT 1989 BLAZER FORFIBTURE PROSECUTION SERVICES SIREN REPAIR GOLF COURSE AD DIRECTORY ADV MARCH SAC CHGES MARCH SAC ADM FEE HOBBLE RESTRAINT-TOMCHECK 7 May 1999 Fri 12:33 PM Check Number Check Register City of Orono Date Name Transaction Amount Page 6 Convnents Check Number 58864 58864 MINNEAPOLIS COM 6 TECH COLLEGE 07-May-99 MINNEAPOLIS COM fc TECH COLLEGE Totals Check Number 58864 MINNEAPOLIS COM k TECH COLLEGE 200.00 350.00 DATA PRACTICES-ANDERSON Check Number 58865 MINNEGASCO 58865 f8865 58865 58865 58865 07-May-99 07-May-99 07-May-99 07-May-99 07-May-99 Totals Check Number MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO 58865 MINNEGASCO 152.79 13.57 198.28 162.22 286.31 813.17 GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE Qieck Number 58866 MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASSN 58866 07-May-99 MN CHir? OF POLICE ASSN 50.00 SHIRTS - OIESWICK Totals Check Number 58866 MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASSN 50.00 Check Number 58867 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 58867 07-May-99 Totals Check Number MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 58867 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 240.00 240.00 SAN SWR PMT APPL-HAW Check Number 58868 MN STATE TREASURER 58868 58868 07-May-99 07-May-99 Totals Check Number MN STATE TREASURER MN STATE TREASURER 50868 MN STATE TREASURER 2,780.45 -111.22 2,669.23 SURCHARGE-FIRST QTR SURCHARGE-AMD FEE Check Number 58869 58869 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE 05-May-99 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE i9.50 COFFEE FOR RESALE Totals Check Number 58869 MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE • 1 a: Check Number 58870 MTI DIST CO. 58870 07-May-99 Totals Check Number MTI DIST CO 58870 MTI DIST CO 233.50 233.50 SERVICE - IRRIGATION SYS Check Number 50971 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 58871 05-May-99 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 108.00 MAY PERA LIFE Totals Check Number 58871 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 3.78.00 Check Number 58872 NSP 58872 lO-May-99 NSP 136.15 HVTY 12 SIGNAL LITES 7 May 1999 Check Register Page Fri 12:33 PM City of Orono Oieck Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 58372 NSP 58872 lO-May-99 NSP 1,194.25 ST LITES 4/1/99-5/1/99 58872 lO-May-99 NSP 1,097.76 CENTRAL SERVICES 58872 lO-May-99 NSP 455.08 POLICE ELEC 58872 lO-May-99 NSP 79.49 CD ELEC 58872 lO-May-99 NSP 254.59 STREETS ELEC 588*’2 lO-May-99 NSP 23.28 PARKS ELEC 58872 10-May-99 NSP 368.37 WATER ELEC 58c72 lO-Kay-99 NSP 1,545.55 SEWER ELEC 58872 lO-May-99 NSP 187.69 GOLF ELEC Totals Check Number 58872 NSP *5,342.21 Check Number 58873 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC. 58873 lO-May-99 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.16.38 ClPS FOR RESALE Totals Check ^rurnber 58873 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.16.38 Check Number 58874 OMAN, LYLE 58874 lO-May-99 OMAN, LYLE 36.30 MILEAGE 4/12-4/20/99 58874 lO-May-99 OMAN, LYLE 97.35 MILEAGE 4/21-4/28/99 Totals Check Number 58874 OMAN, LYLE 133.65 Check Number 58875 OWL ENGINEERING. INC 58875 07-May-99 OWL ENGINEERING,INC 325.00 INTERMOD STUDY/BBLL SOUTH Totals Check Number 58875 OWL ENGINEERING,INC 325.00 Check Number 58876 PIONEER 58876 07-May-99 PIONEER 50.33 LAND USE APPLICATIONS 58876 07-May-99 PIONEER 21.57 APPL 82479 58876 07-May-99 PIONEER 21.57 APPL 82474 58876 07-May-99 PIONEER 21.57 APPL 82477 58876 07-May-99 PIONEER 28.76 APPL 82480 5887S 07-May-99 PIONEER 35.95 APPL SPRING HILL 58876 07-May-99 PIONEER 23.37 BOARD OF REVIEW NOTICE Totals Check Number 58876 PIONEER 203.12 Check Number 58877 POST BOARD 58877 07-May-99 POST BOARD 90.00 LICENSE-B JOHNSON 58877 07-May-99 POST BOARD 90.00 LICENSB-MCNALLY 58877 07-May-99 POST BOARD 90.00 LICENSB-MCNICHOLS 58877 07-May-99 POST BOARD 90.00 LICENSE-MOROWCZYNSKI Totals Check Number 58877 POST BOARD 360.00 Check Number 5S878 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC 7 May 1999 Fri 12:33 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Humber E^te Hame Check Humber 56878 58878 POWERCLEAH COMPAHY IHC. 07-May-99 POWERCLEAH COMPAHY IHC. Totals Check Humber 58876 POWERCLEAH COMPAHY IHC. Check Humber 58879 PRAIRIE OFFSET 58879 05-May-99 PRAIRIE OFFSET Totals Check Humber 58879 PRAIRIE OFFSET Check Humber 58880 PRAIRIE RESTORATIOHS INC. 58860 07-May-99 PRAIRIE RESTORATIOHS IHC. Totals Check Humber 58880 PRAIRIE RESTORATIOHS IHC, Qieck Humber 58881 PRECISIOH TURF 58881 58881 07-May-99 07-May-99 PRECISIOH TURF PRECISIOH TURF Totals Check Humber 58881 PRECISIOH TURF Check Humber 58882 RATHBUH« BARRY 58882 07-May-99 RATHBUH. BARRY Totals Check Humber 58902 RATIEBUH, BARRY Check Humber 58883 RICKS SUPERVALUS 58683 58883 07-May-99 07-May-99 RICKS SUPERVALUE RICKS SUPERVALUE Totals Check HUmber 58883 RICKS SUPERVALUE Check Humber 58885 SEHIOR COMMUHITY SERVICES 58885 07-May-99 SEHIOR COMMUHITY SERVICtJ Totals Check Humber 58885 SEHIOR COMMUHITY SERVICES Check Humber 58886 SHAHK CONSTRUCTORS Transaction Amount 1,524.45 1,524.45 139.27 139.27 505.68 505.88 926.55 467.32 1,393.87 72.99 72.99 13.27 48.81 62.08 3,507.00 3,507.00 Page 8 Comments CARPET/TILE CLEANING BUSINESS CARDS SRING BURH-FRHCH CRK PRK FERTILIZER FUNGICIDE SAFETY SHOES BAKERY ITEMS - PD CONDIMENTS Check Number 58884 ROAD RESCUE 58884 05-May-99 ROAD RESCUE 210.00 SQUAD TEAR DOWN 58884 05-May-99 ROAD RESCUE 1,164.68 SQUAD SET UP 8183 58884 05-May-99 ROAD RESCUE 1,763.88 SQUAD SET UP 8184 58884 07-May-99 ROAD RESCUE 1,317.10 SOD SETUP - 8185 58884 07-May-99 ROAD RESCUE 692.00 SQD TEAR DOWN - 177 Totals Check Number 58884 ROAD RESCUE 5,147.66 2ND QTR SENIOR SERVICES 7 May 1999 Fri 12:33 FM Check Number Check Number S8686 Date Check Register City of Orono Name 58886 SHANK CONSTRUCTORS 07-May-99 SHANK CONSTRUCTORS Totals Check Number 58886 SHANK CONSTRUCTORS Check Number Transaction Amount 56.244.00 56.244.00 Page 9 Comments RFP »7-NAV WTR REHAB 58887 SRF CONSULTING GROUP TNC. 58387 lO-May-99 Totals Check Number SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC. 58887 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC. 791.16 791.16 T.H.12 RELOCATION-PH 2 Check Number 58888 STAR TRIBUNE 58888 58888 58888 S8888 05-May-99 05-May-99 07-May-99 07-May-99 Totals Check Number STAR TRIBUNE STAR TRIBUNE STAR TRIBUJ.-E STAR TRIBUNE 58888 STAR TRIBUNE 425.00 225.00 338.40 104.00 1.092.40 ADV FOR ASSIST ZONING ADV FOR CSO CSO ADVERTISEMENT NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION Check Number 58889 STREICHERS 58889 58889 58889 58839 58869 58889 58889 lO-May-99 lO-May-99 lO-May-99 lO-May-99 lO-Nay-99 lO-May-99 lO-May-99 Totals Check Number STREICHERS STREICHERS STREICHERS STREICHERS STREICHERS STREICHERS STREICHERS 58889 STREIOIERS 36.90 350.00 39.30 33.90 56.87 63.69 26.57 607.23 CLIPBOARDS 14 GIFT CERTIFICATES CLIPBOARDS KEY.RADIO HOLDERS ASSESSORIES UNIFORM ASSESSORIES UNIFORM ASSESSORIES Check Number 58890 TEE'S PLUS 58890 07-May-99 Totals Check Number TEE'S PLUS 58890 TEE'S PLUS 18.95 18.95 DARE SHIRTS Check Number 58891 TEMPORARIBS-TO-GO 58891 58891 lO-May-99 07-May-99 Totals Check Number TEMPORARIES-TO-GO TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 58891 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 162.50 228.13 390.63 TE.MP HELP-WEEK END 4/25 TEMP HELP - ADM Check Number 58892 THE HOKE DEPOT 58892 58892 07-May-99 07-May-99 Totals Check Number THE HOME DEPOT THE HOME DEPOT 58892 THE HOME DEPOT 31.95 -17.36 14.59 POLICE SHOOTING SUPPLIES CREDIT ON ACCOUNT Check Number 58893 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 58893 lO-May-99 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 1.081.20 DARE T-SHIRTS 7 May 1999 Fri 12:33 PM Check Number Date Name Check NunOE>er 58893 TREADWAY GRAPHICS Totals Check Number 58893 TREADWAY GRAPHICS Check Number 58894 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Check Register City of Orono Transaction Amount 1,081.20 Comments Page 10 58894 lO-May-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 54.83 PHONE CHARGES 58894 lO-May-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 44.26 PHONE CHARGES 58894 lO-May-99 US WEST COfWUNICATIONS 853.84 PHONE CHARGES 58894 lO-May-99 US WEST CO^WUNICATIONS 28.46 PHONE CHARGES 58894 lO-May-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 66.41 PHONE CHARGES 58894 lO-May-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 107.72 PHONE CHARGES 58894 lO-May-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 263.52 PHONE CHARGES 58894 lO-May-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 54.83 PHCNE CHARGES Totals Check Number 58894 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 1,473.87 Check Nundber 58895 WOLF,LANETTE 58695 05-May-99 WOLF, LANETTE 250.00 APRIL COUITCIL MINUTES Total* Check Number S6895 MOLF. LAHETTE 25C.00 Check Number 58896 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 58896 07.May-99 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 8.00 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 58896 07-May-99 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 23.55 ELECTRICAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 50896 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 31.55 Check Number 58897 YOCUM OIL CO INC. 58897 lO-May-99 YOCUM OIL CO INC.624.78 DIESEL FUEL Totals Check Number 58897 YOCUM OIL CO INC.624.78 Check Number 58898 YOUNG,JACKIE 58898 lO-May-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 150.00 PARK MINUTES 58898 lO-May-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 200.00 PLAN MINUTES 58898 lO-May-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 150.00 COUNCIL MINUTES 4/26 58898 lO-May-99 YOUNG,JACKIE 150.00 BOARD OP REVIEW 4/28 Totals Check Number 59898 YOUNG,JACKIE 650.00 Grand Total 120,061.39 7 May 1999 Pri 12:33 PM Check Register City of Orono Finance User Initials RJO Friday 7 May 1999 12:32 PM Start 12:33 PM Finish Buffer Name History Records Read 1235 Records Selected 160 Number of Pages 11 Selected by Check/receipt Date Equal To lO-May-99 And Check Number Greater Than 0 Sorted by Check Number Totals No Page Breaks Page 11 i 1 i . 1 INFORMATION COUNCIL MEETING MAY I 0 1999 CITY O^OMOiVu ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL MEETING MAY 1 0 1999 CITY OF UHUNO \• I * ; ^ \o VX \y \ I« i ' f u <a a: Cx3 H if)u D O Cx]o: ON o>o> Qu H CJ oo c/3 U Cx3 tui Q U3 tD C/3 to M CO H M § U3 H O 0< O CO zo: o Q O CO D Ci4 if) o CO M H M M U X q: COa CO D O ►H > COa:a GO o\ iH O fOo ti SuiS o o ^ o CO COa u CO < OQ H O cd § CQ Ctza H o ao u a H a < cd o aa H M aa 0%VOOOOOOOrHVD OrHOOOOOOC^CTk • •••»••••• OmOOOOOOVDON fH 0\ GO GO (J\ LH rH VO ^ <N C^ oooooooo oooooooo • ••••••• oooooooo ♦«♦ o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o VO o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o as • •• •• • • • •• •• • • •• o o 00o o o o o o o o o o o 7,6899 1 *♦*«M 1 z oooooooooo oooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o 1 o oooooooooo oooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o 1 M • • •• • • •• • •• • • • • • • •• • • •• • • • •• • 1 00 H ^POOOOOOOOP*ooaooooa a o o a o o o o o o o <n <rH m o o o ^O O VO O VO cv as a'x D VO rH o o o (TV CA CM a a CJ »H a %^ ^ ^to ^ Z m <OS n o as o fH VO O P^a a a s ^>o> a CM fO CM m O iH CM M*fH rH a m fH P-CM CM fH rH o % «o o o o • • o o *o o o o • • o o ♦oirjooominomo 004000(Nt^OCNJlO ^ooooor*irior*(N in ov in CO go m m ro <N ^ Oi o in in OJ • • m VD rH ro VO iH VO m o\ VO O O O O VO o o o o a o o o in r>in o o t>* in o o m • • • • o o ^ ^ CM in cr» iH ^ o o o o o o o o o o o • • • • • in o o o in o o o o rH iH O CM « o o o o • • in in m ro « o o o o • • o o * o o o o• • m in m rH * * oo• o iH n as o ♦ m VO VO ro VO CM CM CM CM O iH O rH rH O rH ♦ O m O rH O O O O rH fH ♦ rH CM CM VO O rH CM CO m iH m o « rH rH ♦ o o ♦ iH rH •*1 <11 as r* •H iH 5^ o VO o • • • • rH C\ Oin rr cv in 00 rr o o o o o 00 O O o o • ••••• ^ o o o o o oooooooo oooooooo• ••••••• oooooooo o o o o o o o o • • • • o o o o o o o o o o o o o o• • • • • o o o o o o o o o • • o o c o o o • • o o * o o o o • • o o fH o fH in 4t. « o as• o rH m iH CM IS 14c c r Vi < V P < > tr o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o • ••••* o o o o o in oooooooo oooooooo o o o o o o o o I* ^' r* VD iH o o o in in o VD m m oooaoooom VO O O VO 5T CA o o a CA rH O fH O CM O O CM a m a OD %« X X ^ oo 00 fH a fH m GO P-a VO (M o a H CM o o o o o o o o o o• • • • • o o o o o « o o o o • • o o 0 O0 c a * c c• • c’4 r} • (M K X ♦ ♦ O O o o o o Jo <'5 ■< Jl *•»♦•ii a ooooaooooa aooooooa . o a o a o o o o o o o o o o o a a oaoor^oooocM cooooaoon o o p^o o o o o o o o o o o n a ■ •••••••••• • • • * • • •• • • •• • • • •• •• •• ••BASE ]mP'OOOCAOOOOGO p* o o 00 (A m as anno n - «• « » CM a n *H rH vooaacMoocA rH P^ n fH p- O rl iH n P^ CM CM o n o n ^ CA n 00 ov o o o o o P* C^ o o 1,4091,409o o 16,520rH 1 X rlHnr-lfHOOfH 1 <A 1 H ^ rH if) as 1a^ » M a 1 H oS'x. O a aa ^a a D 04 O •z a D 3ZaH^a a a H red a Q u a VO CM o o iH in iH rH CM o as H * CM iH o m H fH o o o rH rH * o o ♦ CM CM « o o « fHVO I o D M I s pi a a ^•ZcdoaEaHaaac2HZ4:oiaaOrH C7^ *H o: c/3 M M \ CJ (d C Od O Q O CJ c^ ij•H<QuacdQU4:4: o 'oaau'^a<< • < o 2 ' • »•Hji ISSSZZCJJQDoaaaoooau 7) aaaaQUUUQ<a o H a z CJ2 ►H a >• a z a aHO a az a M z o z o rH >< H o < M raa*HaH-ic« idrH u QUHoaaoj •HCJZi^<HZOiJczoaaaM^ o rd M CJ a M a jj X H ana h •u^ftciioizacnu^ Q^a»HMaD<o p 5;a<a>aoQa oda od H »H cna a a rd c; a a 2 •H o: :»d o a p z o: u E H >H a » :3 X cii Ha rH >H a ^a a a 5 a z a o H M if) »H H0) o a a a rd z uZ 2 M o H CJ a a a a z ou a: if) o o: ua; a a • 0) a a < a d if) if) if) if) if) o:a H <Z »H <d >< rH §5a o o iJ c: a I cn2 a •Had ana a zoaM a TJ Ha0) ft rHzc a rd M fH •H a »H XJ a rd 44 H rd 0 Of xJ 0) a XJ XJ a 0 Q < 0 1 XJ XJ T3 0) a I u o •C H a j:3 0) Z JO rd •H M d (0 < da a a D a a CJ VO in CM ca 4l •* olo: Hcn a S oHcn oo <5< “> ( 1 .•« oo oo oo oo om oo M* CO • •d*m oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo Cx3 04 COHcn COs10co Cx] zoMs oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo OOVDOfHOOOOCOOOoor^oooooomoo oomoc>ioo\ininc\oin omcoooinvoH^r^r^ O f>l C7\ (M r-l «H ^ iH oooocooooooooooooooooooo OOOOOOOOOCMOJO o ITJ in iH in r* o\ rH 04 CM o ^in in VO m iH ^ o rH 51 • •o o o • o 00 VO 0 01 ooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooo o ,,«•••••••••••••••• • inoooinr>ooooooooooooo o cNooovocooooooooooomoo o <7\inr-IOOOOiHinOinHIOinOOOD^040iH iHC0O4VOfMC%%rCNVOfHCN04in H O rH 04 fH rH f-4 rO iH iH § a\ C\a\ a\ H a: 04 < zi ON ON ON r’ § o:CO Cl4o XHzoz COXH 0!io CX4 QCODcncn M cn M cuzou DJ CO CQ Q M a Xz HM COcu cn M 2F*3JSUFi2H02W eso{wJOWi-'<JO«w ^O<<Qf0iSCdOMDQ 0o<s2au2QMXcabtf 33 = =‘ H CO >• CO CO H CO >* CO s§g CO iJ X X OJ O Qxzu M O M Cl4 X Cl4 M H M XXX X O X X X> z > M M Q U Q >oz X X C3z M X Q O C3zz __ _ X Mo X X H X X Q Z O H X O X X O X Z X X X X X M ogd3g^3 M 2s X O O X s M X X X X ♦J X X M Xzxox M Z X X p S Xz£z< X Xo u HCJ ?H 2 z Z Z X M2 X s ,X X X H Z X Q X Ho X i5 z X u Q X O Z Z > CJ O HO < X U X oz ox X DM >< H X Z X o ca Q M 2 o H »J O Z M 2 X M O X X z D < Z X X OX z X 3 u X z X iJ 3 X Eh X < M X X X CJ X X X < ox Q Z Eh 2 5X 5 z X x^ 2 X X X X o X O X X X o > O C^ Z O D X ^ 3 < D X Q X U X Eh X uz M zo M nmmoxxvDXOXOmovmoxvo^^H^o 0JV0CNJOV0OO04HOO 0«Ht^OHX®0*0®0 OOCTkOOrHrOOJCNJfOO Oir^040XC^CN|®HOIO ov^xox^xroxxo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 04 VO r» O VO O rH O O O' o ® O 04 04 ® O fH 04 iH ® O ® O X 04 o X O' a\ O fH H rH H o 04 r* ON O a\ a\\o 00 ^ ^ ® X H m ^ iH iH fH 0^000 0X000 o ® o o o o o o o o 0^000 o m o o o 0X000 O fH O O O Hr*XfHX5rHOfH040N004 ®fHONCNJCN4XXr^0'0'r'0NX 04CN4H04040404040404040404 fHHfHfHfHfHfHfHfHrHfHiHfH HfHfHfHfHfHfHfHfHrHfHfHfHooooooooo f004^XX»®®OfHXXX X®®®C^^®C^®®^V004 04(NI04 04CN4 04 04 04 04 04 04 04CN rHiHfHfHfHrHrHrHfHfHiHfHfH HHH -IrHHfHfHHHtHHrH OOOOOOOOOO I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I * * Ixxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxoooooooooooooooooooooooooo t^X®X®r4VDn4C4^fHXCN4XrNr**X®CN4XC>4®rO^OX HCN404CN4fHOfHCN4(N4r4rnr4O(N4OrHOrHOOCN4fHCN4CN4fnO mronmrnxrornrNxmxxroromroxxfOroxmfHmrooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ^ONONCyNONONCTNONCTNCN^ONONCNONONONONONCTNONONONONCNON aNCTNC7NCNON®ON®ONCNONXCNONXCNONONCrNONCNXONONXON < Z Q Z X Q § Xoz Eh M Oj XQ QZ QQ QX OC O DX< Q Q QQ Q& XXX 3 XXXX X>XXX WXXX X Q UiJM xqxcj- ^ XXOZZXUMXXXo zz> xxo»HOEh <doo<q><o o XZXXEhXHEh <XDCd_,. Z^XSX4;m>h2CJ>< ►a<<XXXEHEHOQpX .. mQHPEh2>QEhZQXEhXmXXHXZX|hU Eh >4><dj <xz><2xx2<<Eh>4QHH»h>h5o <SSoxao2xox2xM<>^<4;zp:px.. fflQXZXXEHfflXZXXQQZQZZXCJOEHiJ Q X Xo M X Q0QQZCUQ0<Q <OXOOX QXi40 30X0Z m20X QX < Q X tH u tH •JOIH2 s s X X X X z z o OMce U X X H Eh O O X X X X X X X X M M X X >* Z X X H X z Q X O X rH ro fH ® fH ^ m ^ fH ® m X ro yo ® ® C^ ® n4 C>4 •H fH fH fH o o I I X Xoo ON fH CN rn m o o X X X X Q 52 a u < 2 >H VO Z OXOOX X X ® C^ X X XOXOX O O O X VD oXHX^®xx®XfH5j*xx®x(N4x® or*xxx®vo r*n®tHxxr*cN4xo(>4®5j»®fH®r ‘Oxr^x^®H5j«® ^fMfH^C>4®^CMHXCN4fHXfMC4C4CN4nXHCN4(N4(N4nrOH HCMMCNlOiHfHfHfHfHrHXXr^XXXXXXXXXXXOVD OOOOrHfHrHiHtHHfHiHHiHHCMC4CMCM04C>4C4r4CN4CSXfN4 2 Eh Mz X Xo X o M X oz zo >H X Z X M X Q X Q M X Ctf X zz X Z X O Q X z X O X oo u < ou Q X 5 H Z X Z D S 2 X a O H q3 XQXOO o< 0>h0X0 CJ X 2 X Z X X Xz Xu M ij M X X o X X X U M 2 X Eh C20ZZ a X X X ZUO^^JEh i4J2 OU a U ZU CJi45U_ til Q 2 O X X XXXmHZXXCJ XOQXU Z XQ< X 2 M X M X P P <MX zxxazxx EhXEhCJH>2mXX Q<XOQEhXZ2XX xxmoxmjox2x>xq2o4;xx X Xo X X Xz z XXX X U X O Eh Eh X Eh a 2 X X Z X X >< >» X Of vlf X X Ou < CJ H O P P Eh H M H < < X O Z O 2 U U Q cn M M M X X X X H Eh X 2>X>bCJX 2 X > X a ^M J M X M z X X 2 04 04 X Lnr^fHr-0®fHOrHrHr^OfHiHONrHVD®rH fHr^®VOOXiHO®®ONOONiHONfHr4(NVO O* ,OXr‘OXCN4<Nr^XC^OfHr4fHC>4®®X ®rnrs4®®ON^®®(NfOOX^CN4^CN4CN4C4 r'®rOXfH®fHXC^mXOOH«^fH®®rO r^r*4roc>4®r^^r^xm'ii*o®^x^(>4r'4cn rNmfHmmmrofnmnmomnromrorom 53»ino®r^o(N4m^®ro®r^o®fHf^xx CNlCNCNr4fN4O4CNfN4C4C>4<N4CNfH04CN4CNCN4CMi4 HfHfHfHHHHHfHfHHHHHHHfHHfH HHHfHHHHHHfHHrHHHHHHHH ooooooooooooooooooo I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO rHfHmXXXXXXC^®XC>4fHX®CN4XX OOOOOOOOOfHHO rnmmfommmrHmmmmrommromnro oooooooooooo XX®XXXXCT»®ONXXC3NXONCTNON XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ^ X Xo QX X X X Q XXX X X X Q X H X CJ U X O ^ o Q H Z< MJZXw3 Q X X Q H X z X Q X Q X X O , CJ ZEh < 3 X X CU o Q X X X Q _ 2 X Z X CJ < o QZH o o o o in in in fH O CM fH ON CM ro VO c^ r*in n C^ CM CM H CM m Tf ON ON CJ fH fH fH fH fH rH fH CM o o o O O o in o O fO fH iH fH X M Iu M > m m o CM ® C>4 C4 C4 H H O I Xo •H o \ roo ON ON P 2 U CN4 M CJ X CM Xz in in CM m ® o o o iH m^fMrn^coroovo rooin^cMinin^^r^r' •HcHfHCMC7N^n»^0VON<nON u ON fH X < Q X 2c-« X o CM H O P X O <cu X 04 a\ yr a\ o\ o\ iH occu < § X U4o Q Cz] D W W M w H M CO cu z 0 M1 § o: CO ON ON ON A cd CO Q M o: CQ2 H M CO 04 CO CO M oooooooooooo oooooooooooo 0\0^'000000000 o«Hc. ooooooinoin incMuiooooomminvo fH H c>i a> CM iH iH fH cd bl CO o: X s COw u2 o 2> HX M < D M Cu ^ X bli CO Zob<:oo X »4 CO CJ O < .J M X N O Z az M U Z CO CO X O cu QXX o ox mXmOi^OuXOSZO ^OW^OXQX XQMH XOX mXX PDPXCKIX UXUXXHiJXP oovooxvoc^inmr^or^ OOOOX^HfHXXOO^ ocMrocMLOVDC^ininor^fH or^mr-ocMr'rHOOiHo omcMrOfH^mmHCMrncTN or>r*rox<MroroXfMfO^ oo\^c7Nm*^^(rkmino>o^ OCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM rO^C^XVDt^^XHVDa-v# ^xvoxxxx^5f^aoc^ CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCN OOOOOOOOOOOO I I I I I I I I I I I I oooooooooooo fHOOVDXONONHnH^(T\X OOiHCMCMCMrOOOOCMH mmmmmrommmmrim OOOOOOOOOOOO o • o o q CP (7\(J\XO\O\X0\XON<7^C7NO> ON<7NC\ONO>ON<y\0\<T\0\(y\<7> C Oi Q X X Q X Q Q > O Q Q X Q ZXXXQXXQ^iJUX 3w<j:S2«<ta8<M^ (0O2r-IMHQ3 ><|J MMHt;X*-3<M>iXXWO x2 >NXQHXXmo>«zxw>i><2xwox M<OOX<<XOXX>< XXHCuXXXXZCJXi-^ oominooor^o^o o\oo^r*x\ooc^oxx cnvwMXtHHr'Xfo^ovo CMmr-liHCMCM^CMi-*HCMm tH H O O U r-IrHf—l»Hr-40NT3»^^Cr\r0 OOOOOrHCMCMCMCMiH •4 40v9 ^ r 4 \ f I 1 c \ V ) u fO H r UJXXX XXI f # QXH M 00 VD CM X CM X CM c^ CM iH H O I Xo cy\ H o o\ o\ it Q > X <H < CQ < oo\ •H CM ON U »H fH uX U H X H \0 uo < 04 ONo^ ON o <1! g CO a\ a\ o\ H pi: Si i zo M S D .J < > C-* o: Cdzzo ou 0^ Cd CQ Q M cdo Z 00000000 00000000 00000 00000 00000 ^ ^ ^ ^ « LHiHOLnC^ CNJ r-l LO CNJ CM lA O O O O O O 0\ iH ooooooooooooocooooooooooo 0000000000000000000000000 • ••■•••■••••••••••••••••• oooinooooooooovDOomootooooooooocrioininooooooHooujoocooooooin^mminmcMooi-tooocMocoGocDiniH^rinoinrH 000000 000000 • ••••• 000000 000000 ON tn i-i in o o 000000 000000 o o o hQ o o in ON o o VX> CM^ iH CO in CM (N O O O iHVDCMfHCMONm^CNVOfH H ^ H O r-l O rH ^ H VO iH m m in CM rH SO* 000000000 000000000 • •••••••• ooocooovooo 000f00c0^*00uncMinovovoinoo H VO ^ r-in o (M CM H CO ON fH iH o: Cd M z M Cd Z HOz zSZZCdM Dcd<5: Cd CO cu Ou H iJ cx: 2 o CO O Cd P j Z Cd Q O Cd o HZ > O ^d2o w ..4 z o z H M H < CQ O Q M H ►JQS O M O CO CO 4! D Z Cd Z CQ Q Z Cd Z Z Scdidcou 54 Cd < Mo z < cd CO z z Cd Z O 2 id Hz z z u z J o O ►“* M s < m z > Ci4 CO Cdos cu B Cd iJ z z a M .4 O Cd< z z CM CO O H Z i4 M 2 CO § § •^2 Z CO Z 4 5 z Z M Cd •JZWHZQWS Dcd>OZZ43z2<oo<>»< C0Z4 z2ZO4O4 z Z Cd O Q CO Z i4 Cd O Z z Q Cd Z H W Z Z Cd Z Z Cd H *4 Z Cd Cd O 04 D O S CO > O Z Q 00 O W Z < O »-* Z Z Q CO O O Z Z z M z CO Cd D Z CO < M O M O Q Z CO Z Ci4 O O H O CO Z Z O M 0 4: CQ ^ d5 h CO i4 Z O Z O- M H W W Z H 2 ^ W 8 3 i4> Z Z D Z Z 4: 4 Z O ZZ2Z O Mz o z c8 M 4 M O O O M 4 Z z c:) z z z S3 z u 2 Z 4 Z M < Z H Z O Cd Z Cd M Z Z Z Z Z Z H < O W Z Z O 2 4 W O O 4; Z Z Z UZ2Q_ M 25 M H M Z Z 0 4 Z 4 q<44!OZZ4 Z Z 4 Z Z MM 4ZDZM4ZZ ^3 4 O < Z o z M Cdo o M z z z z 4:4: o z 2 zz z o 5 z 0Z40 O di O M Z O M p Cd O Z Mn o z > z z dt dfoz o o z M H H 2 z Z X Z Z Q Z Q P Mz z z S z zmj>>2mz H Cd Z Z Z Z M 4 4 O MQ 2 z z O Q Z M M Z Z< z z 4 Z Z . _ Z D M z o 4: Z Z Z Z oz M zo M D Z H Z Zoo oz • M 25 O Q O Z O Z M M Z Z M CO H Z M O Z Z «dl Z Z X Z O HO H z Z g dJ Z Z M Z Z H Z Z H Z Z Z O 2 H Z 2 DDZH, O Z 4 CD Z < H X O Z M Z Z z32Z^qS Z Z O Z Z Z Z Z H Z Z H X Z Z Z Q Z M H 2 M D M 4 Z O X Z O 2 O P Z Izz oz M 4z 4 Z Z^ OH M Z z Z H CD OOP Z Z 4 Z Z O CD dJ 2 Z Z Q QmSZZ Z Z O M M Q Z Z Z Z 0 H M , Z Z Z H Z O O Q O Z Z M O 4 2 H Z 4 Z Z4ZZ>4 O Z Z M p Z Z Z O Z Q O 2 3^ fH r- CM VO m o o ON VO O rH O ON fH C^ O O GO O ON Z ^ CM (N 00 O CO O CM iH rH CO O 00 CDOCOZCMOr-z ON o ^ Z rH rH rH r-l O rH ON ON CJN ON ON VO Z M CM H CM CM rH CM f—I rH CM fH 4* ON Z Z inzo H Zz z o z o o o XT O o CM o CO o ZC^t^VOZZfHCMOZOVOr^OZOCOrHiHOHfHVOVOrH CM CM O H r- Z CM VO Z VO o z o Z Z O CM z C^ Z CM Z H C^ CM CM CM r* ^ Z M* M* z m CM ro H HVOOOZOCMVOOZOZiHrHOZVO^OVO ZZZOCMfMZr-OHOZCMCMCMr*ZOZZ H(MM*Or^r^CMVOZCMOZ^5fZZCMZZCM ZZZOZZZZHM«OZiHMZr*ZZCMZ ZZt^OCMZCMCMZZOt^f^^fC^ZZCMC^Z ZZM*OZZ^ZZC^05?ZZZM*ZZM*VO CMZHOfHCMZZZZOZZmZZZfHCMZ o o O M* o o z o 0^0 O rH O o z o o o O fH O zzo zz rH r*zr*zz zz ^^fHiHrHfHM*ZfHZiHZOrHrHZrHiHM*CMr-lM*rHiHcHZ CMCMOOOOCMCMHHOCMZOOCMOOfMOOfMOOOCM rHrHrHZZZZrt HOOfHCMCMCMO C^ZfHZVOOOZZZZOZ 5j«ZfHVOM*OrHM*ZZZOZ rHVOfH(NCMOHOZ5l»CMCMZ OfHZZC^OOZrH^t^r^O ZOrHCMCMOCMZOZZZrH ^ZZM^ZOfHCMC^ZCMZZ ^ZZZZOZZM^VOZZZ CMiHZCMHOHHHZHCMCM ZOZZHZfHrHCMZCMrHiH CMMHHHCMHiHOHOOO Q Cd Q X Q id 0X0 Cd Q Cd X q Cd X X Q XX U 4 X O Q 0 2 Df X O O H , c3 4 CD 5 O Z 4 X Q Q X g * Q Q Q Cd X > X X X M 4 OOXZZX ^ 2 S ^XHHHCO^^ C0X2>^D&224JC^QQ^Q 4Pp jf<H5H>XpX tHMHwwUfHZHw 4zxxhq 2zhzz 2zh x^-gz 2w22x^XQHHH2MXXXCDCU>iWOCdaW><Z>^:H2>4tx:^XDXHX2HZZP 0>-2<23200HM2XXXa2xxW22020>aX0X00200X 2 4 X :? 3: 4 Z X Z U X 2 O O H X Z Cii O X X X H X Z M u Q O O O X X X X X O X b] ti] <! U (/) a g QQ«c Q 0^0 ao:>3 QSQfCdbixo: x O QHOXU Oi^^ot QMcaXXUQZfflO* ‘ w = ^22.,>ho rf.<ou;j;» XDUU 3>HU B o[^QX§XH& _________________________OXM4>-XH<a XHX0C x4HXHHHZ0H404Zvd XX id X X Q X H X Xo ^ X 4 <0^§2^8 X Qo XX X XQO poo > X X 4 X X Q X Q o8z*^ .QCD O 44:OQZH Z M M xz4:hx 4 H M N q > X > >< a X X OX2XOX CjOiZQZZXZ CMZooz zr*o o 00 00 000 ozzr^ o ot/*ozo zooozoz ozzzc^zoozz CM CM z Z Z Z Z M* o tH O O Z z O CM O Z Z Z O H Z M* Z Z O r4 Z Z O Zt^ZZZZZZZZZZrHHZZ^^(MZfHC^O^ZZzr^ZZt^M*M*ZZr*C^ZC^Zr-ZZZM*O^ZM'fOr*t^CMOZZM'ZZZZCMH(MHZOrOfnZZtH ZCMCMCMZZZrHfHCMCMCMiHrHCMZCMCMHHM*ZZZM*ZrH^iHHZr4CM^rH<«iHCMCMCMCMmCMC^CMCMZfHfnCMCMtHfHCM 22ZZ2:ZZaaZZa2a222Z2aZ2Z2a22ZaZaZ2Z2Z2Z2~Z2Z222;2222Z2ZZ CMC^ZZZCMCMrHrHHHrHfH^^CMCMZZZZC^ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZr^Z'.MZZ CMrHOOrHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOfHOOOOOOOOOOOOrH^fHCM zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzpooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ZZZZZCMM*CM4*Z^ZZZ fH fH rH rH ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ[2 000000000 zzzzzzzz^.zzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzoz C^ZC^fHZZ5rOrHCMZ^ZZr^ZZOtHCMZM»ZZr'ZZOHCMZM*l/'Zr^ZZOrHfMZM*ZZr ‘ZZOrHCMfnM»ZZ ZZiHCMCM(MZ^M*M'M*^^4»4*M*M*ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZr^r'C^r^r'r^r^t^C^C^®®®CDZZZ HHCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCVCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM^^r^ fHrHfHfHfHrHfHrHfHfHrHrHrHfHfHrHrHfHfHfHrHfHfHfHHrHrHrHfHfHrHfHrHfHrHrHrHfHrHfHfHrHrHfHrHrHfHrHrHfHfHfHfH^ fHrHfHfHfHiHrHiHfHrHrHfHf-lrHrHrHr-lfHrHrHrHrHfHfHrHrHfHrHfHrHfHfHfHrHfHfHrHrHrHr-IMrHfHrHfHrlrHrHHMHH(HM OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC^OOO ooooooooooooooooooooooooooococoooooooooooooooooooooooo Cz]o < o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o in o cN o o o o o o a)oc (U •Htn 0) tjy C rH •H nJ 4-* 4J 0) •H X M (U U U 0) H 4J 0) Ocue >ir-l •H 0) H -H 'O D O e C Id O M O Id H pSc c o M e -p ■HO 0) cn H ro C « ^ Ot P4 C O >i\ . z.c «J-HP<UP>iCO •H tpja nJ 4J O «J 'H o UC«<n)Mnlu^C «J*H »00>WM*H H4JHCOiO<U-HrtP OiU-ih :3 e CO rt-P-P <U«H0)OO<l)O-P4)C u •p C 0)6 p d H o Id > o B <u C C k ; Id (D (U V4 / -^invor^ooo%OfHcMco’^ ncvicscsdcsmmmmm M Q O O (U W U » c O cu -H 3: ^ 4J •H -H cn 0) T3 0)x: o u Id Id 4J 4J 0) d < a o 'v.x, 0) 0) tp tn X Id Id o JXu u u o (d Id o 0) « < U O P4 Q o d) O 0) C N 0) Id Pm O d) •H H w O I o d) M-4o 0 u 1 d) 0)d) M d 4J -Po oau0 M 4J -Pcn cn H >1 Id u cu o •H O d •H M CO (0 d)uu to Qa < •rl I .1c d nD g 2c cn o d) 6 e ____^d)*HOjdd)d) Pi«pSE^a3PWQQ 0)uos H Id •H U P d) O B > B o o s u H Id do •H 4J d •ri -P CO d H u •H Id CO CUT3 d) P CO « Id H3X d) tPO cd-H BXX td d Po p IdX O 03 H d) Q CJ .Q d d •H o U M-i o d) OrH rH 4J I o d CQ rH rH Sd g 'O<u d •H IP d) no d D as SS SS 5S S3 3)5 S33SSS RS c\ o a\ a\ <a ck:uHcnuDa Cda 0 Ms1 o o o o o o o o o o• • • • • o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o • • • • • o o o o o « oo Ci3 < •• a a u H CO CO Do COa ON ON ON 5Co « ♦ ♦ Ho:oa Q DCO O CO 2M o oc H O M H I o\ COco^ M in H o CO COa CO CO <m XHO a 1 a 1 H 1 2 M 1 O♦ u 1 M *1 C\Ha\< ♦a*^D♦O H a 2 ro > HO ♦ o o o o o o o o o o • • • • • in o o o in n CT\ o H VO 00 m CO H O fH O 04 H rH O O O O O O O O O O • • • • • o o o o o ♦o o o o oo o o o o• • • • • o o o o o « «o o • in H GO m m « OJ H •K * O O >*1 « « Haoa COa cn o\ rH m ro O OH •> <n oo CO o> CO o CJVa O H H a o M ^ r ^a a o a o a ♦ M a♦ o a a o o o o o «oao o o o o oa• • • • •• a o o o o o o o a a oa1HO <N m an ^ a ro ^ O H 00 CD a o a a 0) 2 2 Ha 5 a c o 2 cd a a •H M a rH jj a H 44 a a 0) H CJ a rd 14 0 14 HO H Q>2 a o 1aMM <CJ JJ o a s V4 Q M H •0 a H a <aa sgg a a 4^) pad (d InI a Q a D a >U ar a O iH I cn rg o a in a o Ua o a a D a a ^a H Oao a aa < a o oH Haoaaa aaaD oo• oxnm o o oo o o oo o o oo oo oo• o a m o o• o in ro oo o o oo oo oo o o o o o o• o inm aaa a a u rH U <a 2O MH < 0MHaa 1 *-« HMaoaaa Xoauaa & [-• HM 2jiaaa H < O Io H Q W Ha •-3 oa COuu Q UJ tDto C/D M to H M UD Oi Cl]a <cu Cl] H CO Cl] DO Cl] Ce^ DO ♦ •» ♦ ♦ Ho:oou o Cl] zo: o OtC Q O Cl] D Ci- CO O CO H M M O Cl] Di ♦ « ♦ Hi UJ 2 jj o 2r)oo 3e Dr 3 •JL 3 >- iH I CO o^co\ M in H o § cu CQ o oi § CO o: HO o: O Cl] cu Cl] < o: Q g • Cl] c\ ct <r\ B3 O >*HO Z CO M > CO o: I ij cu Cl] Cl] Ci« CO 52 CQ HO CO CU H M CO Oi rnC^tHOOOOOOf-(OJ ^rninoooooor^o • •••••••••• CMO^OOOOOOVD'^ 0\ fH 00 (>J rH CO iH 0\ iH iH GO H CM CS ooooooooo ooooooooooooo oooo• •••••••• •••• ooooooooo oooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o • •••••• o o o o o o o •tl o o o o • • o o « o o o o • • o o ® 10 m ^ in O H f-r H N fH c^CNiHvomomc^o (N CJ VO CM GO GO ^ 0> O O O O fH cMinm jooinc ooooo • •••••••••• ovooo^rmooooi/D m o 03 H o CM r-l m O fO r-i ooooooooo OOOOOOOOO • •••••••• ooooooooo CM in rH inoooooooooinooooooooo o CM m in or'. oooooooocM ^ ^ o o o o o\ VD o a\ o VO 5f in rH o\ VO in fH 00 O CM 1/1 in in r I r- o o o o • • ^ o n o r> t • m o o o o o o o o o o o o o o • •••••• o in o o o o ov ^ o o o CO O O O GO CO VO in CO (M CM o ooinoinoomooinininr-or^inoc^oor* ov o iH rH foooinmooon HOOCMCMinOOH o (71 OI o ^ o o in VOOOHVOCMinOH VO 01 r- H H H fO CM H H o n O VO H 00 VO H m CM H • m VO m '^^^VOfHCMOrHHOCM VO ov o o m CO m rH in O VD H VO Oi iJ oi D Cl]D»^3:cuHq> H 3 M Q O O OGCO COzaucuzoDSO I ODM I socwcncn HXoiUijaHcjicnco JC0HZ<Ciicn'^C0OrH cn»H a: cn M M ^— q u < <0 cs^ ojoqcjqu ^aj .Hl3QCJ04DiQU5<3 o 'OCI4QU'V*COJ<<| lO/J rH < < O g • • H O'^ • •Hji izgzgtnzcjxj DOCi-CiuCOOOOZCOU 3 tacncncoQOOCjMQCco o CO Z CO SS3 H O Cl- CO H \ rH >• H CO m CO M > CO O QOUHOCOCdd •h C3ZH<<HZO xJ czoco3Jcomz o rrJ M CJ CU M jj X H Q CO H iJ COu<otsoo:zco 0>C0mO»hC0D<^D 3 zz<zcx->ci4aQco ♦ ^ O ^ 00 ^ TT 00 m o o •n O GO iH * iH iH oooo oooo • • • • oooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o • •••••• o o o o o o o o o o o • • o o oooo oooo • • • • O r/ O O m o m CM in r- CM 01 in in CM CM o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o • • o o in in o o CM O O • • • • VO m o o 53* C31 m C^ VO H GO o o o o o o o o o o o o o o • •••••• in o o in in o in m m rn m M* VO HO H 5T * O O O O • • o o VOn H H CO n H m H H H CM o\o o Cl] >U ZCi] OH M CO u CU U^>i z o: Cl] CO Z 03 O CO zua Z CD Z O Oi xJ Cd O M H O < H Ci]d Z O o < < M Ou X rH 0- H rH Z 2S M w a Z r^ cnco Cl] Cl] C Cl] Z •H o:«^ p z ci: E H H Cl] (0 XJ 0 iJ 1 :3 X o: H JQ IH M cu < :3 o« Cu cn z CO U1O04iJQ0::v8U Cl] Z O cuce:coocE^o:oE:iJ 0) Cl] Cx] Cl] Ci] I o):i]Ci]<cx]aci] :3 cocozcococococo * o o o o o o • • o o § ^ c > (> c a VX VO c CM cu C ) € > Hi o o 0 o • • 01 OI o o fH iH •» CM CM DC Cl] ij Xz M #H Oi CU XJ CO O iJ 0) Cl] Iuaja •H H 3 Cu Cu CO o o o o • • o o ■ 1 «« «* 1 z ooooooooooo ooooooooo OOOO O O O O O O O o o O O o o 1 o ooooooooooo ooooooooo OOOO O o o o o o o o o o o o o 1 M • • • •• • • •• • •• • • • •• • • •• • • •• ••••••• •• •• • 1 GO H ^rcooooooooocM inooinooinoin <71 O O Cl O O O O O O O O O o o o o Cl <C"- CM o O O 00 O 00 in o o VO in o M*VD VO Ci]'-^D r'* (M ro O O TJ*o r-CM Cl O GO H CD CM CM O H « ^ «« « «« « ^ ^^ ^ % Z cn <(M GO O <71 (71 O VO Cl ^ CM VO in H CM CM >in o H CM rn H CM 00 H in H GO CM CM S m GO GO M*H m m m o CO CM H U1 M GO oi H Cl]ooinoommoomo 5T in O H •n o o o in in 5T O O M*o o o o o o o « o o o o o o cu o Cl]OinCMOOCMC^OOCMO CM o m o o o r-VO O O VO o o o o o o o o o o o o o Cu • •# •• • • • •• • • •• ••••••• •• •• • 1 H mHCTioor^inoor^M’VO in m in o m CO O CM VO o o o o o o o in in o o in in 1 o Cl]r* m <71 o 00 vo co h CM CO m in o o m VO in po CO GO o O OO m m CM m 1 1 1 1 cs rOCIGOCM CMM* CMin » » • r* CM 01 H rl r> Cl H o rH H H CM VO VO m 01 CM 5T in (M m o in VO VO H CM H O O O O • • o o o o o o • • o o o o o o • • o o in HO oe: M Cl] 'd H .J c 2 z •H Cl] M 44 H 1) I-] CU Q < CO Cu Q Z ^55S33 (/> UJ o uu O UJoc (0 4-» o uo Q O O O O Q CNJ >000^ (VI • • • • rJStCSro m N- tn o o in (NJ N>in o o in *-• • • ••- in in »- in N»•O rsJ O “3 (0 c.a< •sc- S V L. (Q 3 U o o o o o o o o o • • • t o in in o o rvj (vj (VI o o o o >oo o o o ^ •- o o •- • • • • in in ^ N» (VJ OJ lO fO o inin (\J vy•- rsj o o o o o o o o o • • • • o in in o >j- (VI o o o ^ o o o o in in (\j (VI oo oin s o o o o in • • • o in Ki ^ (\j m >0 li> •— U O 4^(0 oe u ^ g •- Q. L.ain s & Ss t:^ oc •- l/> ll M *> 6 o g^ca. — o o o o (0o CO ttl > a 01 ^ QCco c 4-» (0 o u % 8. (0 Q. ^ oc O (/)c> o oc 4^ u c 8. <0 (A— c Q. « o o o z z ino o8 COUNCIL MEETING M4r 1 0 1999 Cll Y Uh UhO/VU MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON APRIL 5, 1999 The regular meeting of the Board of Education of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, J^ril 5, 1999. Present: John Maresh Jack Veach Absent: Dave McKown Peg Swanson Martha Van de Ven Thomas Mich Neal Lawson Board member Dick Lewis arrived while the meeting was in progress. UPON MOTION by Martha Van de Ven, seconded by Jack Veach the consent agenda was approved as follows: approved the minutes of the February 8, 1999 regular meeting; approved '*he minutes of the February 22, 1999 regular meeting; - approved the request of Dennis B. Lebakken, Orono High School teacher, for a three year leave of absence beginning with the 1999-2000 school year; - accepted the resignation of Bob Doetsch, Schumann Elementary teacher, effective at the end of the 1998-99 school year; - approved the appointment of Garry Fries as a custodian at Orono Middle School effective March 29, 1999; - approved the appointment of Shawn Glover as a part-time custodian at Orono High School effective March 29, 1999; - approved the Treasurer's Reports for October, November and December, 1998; - approved an extended field trip to Madrid, Spain, June 11 - 20, 1999; - approved the bills as covered by vouchers 108737 through 109160 and office checks as covered by vouchers 6490 through 6527. Motion carried. Board member Lewis absent. Dr. Mich directed the attention of the Board to the PARTNERS IN EDUCATION publication and the article on Paige Lewis, daughter of Board member Dick Lewis; to the FOCUS '99 puolication - an informational newsletter distributed to all staff. Dr. Mich stated that the professional day held on April 3 was a success and he extended an invitation from Intermediate District 287 to visit one or more of their sites on any of the following dates - 4/26, 27, 28 or 30. Dr. Mich provided a brief update on the facilities planning/construction informing the Board that on April 12 the Orono City Council would be considering the conditional use permit and that on April 29 an informational meeting wil] be held for the public. He stated that at the April 29 meeting the architects would present the design drawings for the new middle school and that groundbreaking is anticipated the last week of May or the first week of June. Dr. Mich updated the Board on the activities of the legislature. He brought to their attention a bill authorized by Senator Olson which would make the receiving district of open enrollment responsible for tuition costs, such a bill would serve to provide a financial penalty to the receiving district. Discussion ensued regarding the impact/effect that such a bill would have on our District and other districts as well. UPON MOTION by Martha Van de Ven, seconaed by Dick Lewis, the Board directed administration to send a letter to Senator Olson stating that District 278 is opposed to Senate file 2019 as it focuses on children in need of special instruction and discriminates with respect to how educational costs for these children will be paid. Motion carried. Dr. Mich, Dr. Shutts and Ms. Heidi Foley provided infonriation for the Board on the Graduation Rule. Dr. Mich updated the Board with respect to the status of legislative action, action that probably will not reach resolution until May. Ms. Foley reviewed the curriculum identification documents inclusive of criteria, timelines, terminology, etc. Dr. Shutts presented the performance package information and stated that if parents have concerns, they should contact the building principal for that specific performance package. The Board was also informed that performance packages are available for review by parents at the District Office and each of the school buildings or they may be purchased at a nominal cost. The Board expressed appreciated to the administration and staff for their diligent work in this area. Dr. Mich stated that even if the Graduation Rule would be abolished by the legislature, our will have gained and benefited because of all of the curriculum work that has been done. Dr. Mich presented the 1999-2000 school year calendar to the Board of Education. UPON MOTION by Martha Van de Yen, seconded by Jack Veach, the Board of Education adopted the 1999-2000 year calendar as follows: 1999 - 2000 ORONO SCHOOL CALENDAR AUGUST 2 9 16 23 D 3 10 17 24 4 U 18 25 5 6 12 13 19 20 27* NOVEMBER 1 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 U 12 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 j 29 30 FEBRUARY 7 8 9 10 14 16 16 17 Q |i*i 23 24 28 29 4 U 18 25 MAY 1 8 2 9 16 23 30 3 10 17 24 31 4 11 18 25 6 12 19 26 i i SEPTEMBER OCTOBER i 1 13 20 27 7 14 21 28 D 8 15 22 29 9 16 23 30 3 10 17 24 I ! I 4 11 18 5 12 19 26 6 13 20 27 7 14 1 8 15 28 29 ••••••••• DECEMBER JANUARY I • 24 31 11 18 26 5 12 19 26 6 13 20 27 7 14 21 28 MARCH APRIL 6 13 1 2 7 8 9 14 16 16 3 10 17 3 10 17 4 11 18 26 6 12 19 26 6 13 20 27 7 14 27 28 29 30 31 JUNE 5n 19 26 6 13 20 27 7 14 21 28 1 8 15 22 29 : i 9 Professional Day No School Schocd not in session I • 16 23 30 New Teachers only Opening and dosing of student attendance •••«•■••#*••«•#»••«••••• date..................ACTIVITY August 26, 27 .................New Staff Workshop* Aug. 30 - Sept. 1...........All Teachers Workshop September 2........................First Day of School September 6.............................................Labor Day October 21, 22...................................MFT/MEA October 25 ............................Professional Day November 25, 26..............Thanksgiving Break December 23* January 4.............Winter Break January 17..Semester Break/Professional Day February 21......................................Presidents Day February 22....................................Professional Day March 20 - 24...............................Spring Break April 21........................................Good Friday April 24...........................................Professional Day May 15.............................................Professional Day May 29 .................................................Memorial Day June 9 ..................................Last Day of School June 12...........................................Professional Day CONFERENCE SCHEDULE (all schools) • WW* TUu.A ^ i?n Dr. Mich stated that the Board should be aware that the calendar is based on the premise that the legislation requiring three instructional days beyond that which occurred in the 1996-97 school year will be repealed and in the event that the legislation is not repealed or other changes are made by virtue of legislative action, an amended calendar will be proposed to the Board of Education at that time. Dr. Mich also informed the Board that the calendar complies with the 184 teacher work days as per contract and our practice of having 175 student days. Dr. Mich answered questions from the Board as well as the audience for clarification purposes. Motion carried. Dr. Mich presented the 2000 Series Policies/Procedures (Organization of the School District) and the 4000 Series Policies/Procedures (Personnel) for first readings. He stated that the review/revisions for both series have been completed by Vice Chairman Jack Veach, Mr. Neal Lawson and Ms. Evy Zacher. The 2000 and 4000 series will be returned for approval at the J^ril 19, 1999 Board meeting and should Board members have questions regarding revisions to the either of these series, they should contact Neal Lawson or Evy Zacher prior to the next meeting. UPON MOTION by Martha Van de Ven, seconded by Jack Veach, the meeting was adjourned. Motion carried. The Board held a workshop session on long-range planning following the Board meet=’ig. Maresh, Chair a WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER 1011 First street South, Suite 200, Hopkins, MN 55343 (612) 933^)005 Fax: (612) 933>6046 April 27. IW CniiMrn M;i>t)raiKl C'ilv (,'ouncil C’ily oTOrono PO Hox 0(} Crystal Day. MN 55.^2.^0066 tPR 2 8 1999 MAY 1 0 1999 Q\l'< V./I" VjriOi'iO Cl I Y Ot OHOWU Dear Mayor and City Council: The West Suburban Mediation Center handled 144 new eases during the Hist quarter of 1990, There was one case involving Orono residents, city slaiTor businesses: I lousing (\>urt. mediated with signed agreement Mandatory hicdiation at Conciliation C'ourt will begin May 5"'. The three community mediatiitn programs in I lennepin County will provide volunteer mediators Tor Iwi) e«uiiirooms in the nmrning and two courtrooms in the anernoon. two days a week. Susan A. Ne!s«»n |{\eeutive Director 1 ifi-iirMtiiBTf.rjm'tratrwro COUNCIL MEETING I I O MAr 1 0 1999 O V\ ii Vx A ' X/ ) Js//.. . ¥W\\ ^ // CITY OF OHONO GlTYofORONO Municipal Offices April 27, 1999 Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Re: Joint Orono/Plymouth Ferndale Road North Improvements County Road 6 to Trunk Highway 12 Dear Resident: On April 6, the Plymouth City Council awarded a contract for the reconstruction of Ferndale Road North from County Road 6 to Trunk Highway 12 to S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. On April 20, a preconstruction conference was held with the contractor. City representatives, and the utility companies to coordinate the construction activity including any necessary utility relocation. Work is scheduled to begin the week of May 3, 1999. Construction will commence with minor clearing and grubbing of trees that will need to be removed within the construction limits of the project. Storm sewer installation will then begin near the Trunk Highway 12 bridge and proceed northerly. Street excavation, base preparation, curb and gutter, paving, trail construction and restoration will follow. The scheduled completion date for the project is September 15, 1999, depending on "normal" weather conditions. During construction of the street and storm sewer, there will be traffic delays. The contractor intends to reconstruct the east and west halves of the roadway independently of each other. This will allow for a single through lane for vehicles past the construction on a limited basis as construction traffic will also be using this lane. Depending on the extent and location of the construction activity, local traffic will be routed either north to County Road 6 or south to Wayzata Boulevard during the construction day. While the roadway will be signed "No Through Traffic," it will have two lanes available for local traffic at the end of each construction day. If you have any questions, please contact the onsite Construction Inspector, Leo Pawelsky, at (651) 604-4804 or myself at (612) 249-4621. Also, please use extreme caution while traveling on Ferndale Road North while construction activity is underway and if you have childr en, please direct them to stay away from the construction area. ffincerely, !gory A. Gappa Director of Public Services GAG/ch Tdephooc (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510