Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutComplete 2040 Comp Plan BookCMP Part 1. Introduction City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose 2 Title 2 Scope 2 Overview 3 Figure 1-1: The Urbanization Spiral 4 Community Management Plan Organization 5 Appendix Map 1-1: Regional Location CMP Part 1. Introduction City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 2 CMP PART 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The purpose of this plan is to document and reinforce the established goals, policies and principles of the City of Orono as a guide for orderly and economic private development and public improvement in the years ahead. Major emphasis is on the needs and involvement of people. The Plan discusses how people can manage their environment, how people have become involved with municipal decisions, how people can create and continue the lifestyle and community that we know as Orono. This Plan is a revised, expanded and updated version of Orono’s 2010-2030 Community Management Plan (CMP). It reflects the City’s long-established philosophy, goals and policies that were first introduced in the 1974 Orono Comprehensive Guide Plan and later solidified within the 1980 Orono CMP. Major policy direction remains relatively unchanged but the content has been revised and updated to reflect the changes the City and the Metropolitan Area has undergone since 2010. TITLE The title of this document is the Community Management Plan. Throughout this document, the Community Management Plan will be abbreviated as "CMP". SCOPE The scope of this Plan is intended to include almost every factor that influences investments or improvements in the City, whether by private individuals or government involvement. Each section of the Plan stands on its own merits yet is an integral part of the whole. For instance, Orono's history and natural features are explored as factors explaining and constraining contemporary decisions. The Land Use Management section becomes the primary tool for formulation of zoning regulations and development proposals. Planning of transportation, recreation and sewer services allows for coordination of capital investment with land management and regional system capacity. Relevance of the Plan is important as concepts must be current to be fully understood or implemented. Regular and ongoing reviews are to be conducted by the Planning Commission and City Council to renew this understanding in light of changing attitudes and events. Careful reading will reveal that Orono's past history and current goals have remained essentially the same. Therefore, the reader is advised that for all intents and purposes, this Plan and its impact on local development are intended to be permanent. CMP Part 1. Introduction City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 3 OVERVIEW The basic concerns and philosophies of Orono citizens have evolved through the City's history and its intimate ties with Lake Minnetonka. Map No. 1-1 locates Orono in relationship to Minneapolis and the western suburbs. More importantly, it clearly indicates the relative importance of Orono to the total watershed of Lake Minnetonka. No other city bordering the Lake has as much water area, as much shoreline, or as much watershed land area as Orono. Orono is committed to effective land use planning and permanent environmental protection in an effort to preserve the great resources of Lake Minnetonka for the benefit of all regional residents. The people of Orono, though of diverse interests, have been drawn together by a slow-paced lifestyle and quiet amenities. Their common tie is a commitment to maintain those attractions of which Lake Minnetonka is the most visible example. In the 1950's, increasing urbanization all around Lake Minnetonka threatened to environmentally "kill" the Lake by uncontrolled discharge of nutrients. Citizens became concerned. Their first reaction caused lake area municipalities to begin extending sewer systems to eliminate individual septic system discharges. This helped the situation at first, but by 1968 lake water quality was still diminishing. Citizens became alarmed. At this point the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency joined with the newly organized Lake Minnetonka Conservation District to commission a study of lake pollution. Entitled "A Program for Preserving the Quality of Lake Minnetonka", the "Harza Study" (as it will be referred to hereafter) found that this nutrient input, particularly phosphorus, was being generated from two principal sources: the seven municipal sewage treatment plants; and urban stormwater runoff coming from within the watershed. The first pollution source, nutrient rich effluent outflowing from the municipal sewage treatment plants, was systematically eliminated during the late 1970's and early 1980's by multi-million dollar construction of sewer interceptors designed to remove effluent from the watershed. But stormwater runoff is a different matter. Compared to point-source sewage pollution, the collection and treatment of non- point source stormwater runoff is relatively difficult, costly, and often impractical. Lake Minnetonka is fed by neither spring nor tributary. The sole replenishment comes from storm water runoff from the watershed, of which over one-third flows from or through Orono. Lake Minnetonka, second only to Lake Michigan in this region, has an extremely long 25-year flush-out period. This means that careful and continuous attention must be given to the quality of runoff into the Lake. The various studies conducted in the 1960's and 1970's recommended that lakeshore density be limited and that the natural system of wetlands and marshes be forever protected and preserved as the only practical, economic method of filtering nutrients from storm water runoff. Implementation of density limitations relies on breaking the "Urbanization Spiral", the development paradox that results from providing urban-level municipal services for new development. The paradox is that if municipal services are extended into rural zones, the cost of these services taxes the land to the point that higher density development is required. Particularly in the case of sewers, even if extended to CMP Part 1. Introduction City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 4 existing pockets of development "to solve a pollution problem", inflation, topography and sparse settlement combine to increase costs. Such costs can be paid only by increasing development densities, which in turn cause increasing levels of storm water nutrient pollution. This spiral results in even greater levels of pollution than the original sewage 'problem' might have been. For example, Eugene Hickock's 1973 Storm Water Impact Statement for the Metropolitan Council identified up to 10 times more phosphorus alone from urban storm water runoff than from Orono's low-density rural land use. In response to the above concerns, Orono became a nationally recognized leader in espousing environmental protection. Land use planning since the 1950's has stressed the environmental advantages of low density development. Shorelands, wetlands and natural drainage systems have been preserved by tradition and by ordinance. Comprehensive planning was underway by the mid-1960s. In 1974, the first published Plan, as approved by the Metropolitan Council, established as its foremost guiding principle the protection and preservation of Lake Minnetonka and its associated wetlands. The 1980 Community Management Plan and its subsequent 2000-2020 update reinforced these principles and have served as the basis for management of development in Orono for the past three decades. Figure 1-1: The Urbanization Spiral Illustrates the development paradox that faces Orono if municipal services are extended into rural areas. Orono has consistently made the decision to limit the extension of urban services into rural areas. The combination of low density residential development, establishment of privately owned and maintained roads, and use of septic systems and wells has provided Orono with unique and sustainable neighborhoods that are not only self-sufficient but collectively have a low environmental impact. Enforcement of the policies necessary to create and maintain these rural neighborhoods has been consistent and effective. Today, Orono still faces the same issues as other outlying communities, although Orono is no longer the 'outer ring' that it was 20-30 years ago. Development pressures continue as speculators view our remaining open spaces seeking to put them to a "highest and best use". The Metropolitan Council has recognized an CMP Part 1. Introduction City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 5 urgency to curtail "Urban Sprawl" by making more efficient use of the remaining undeveloped land within the 7-county Metro area. Yet Orono has an obligation to its residents, both those who live on the Lake and those who reside in the rural area, to preserve these two complementary lifestyles. Orono accepts its obligation to the citizens of Minnesota who treasure Lake Minnetonka as a unique and valuable natural resource and who expect it to remain in a usable condition. Orono's ongoing plan to preserve the watershed of Lake Minnetonka is sound, environmentally correct, and in step with regional planning for metropolitan needs. COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN ORGANIZATION This document has been divided into six parts in order to make it more readable and understandable to citizens and other interested parties: Part 1 forms a brief introduction and overview of planning concerns. Part 2 provides a foundation for Orono's plan - the history, community philosophy and general goals and policies that have shaped and will continue to guide Orono's planning strategy. Part 3 encompasses Orono's Land Use Plan, defining how Orono will develop in the coming two decades, and defining Orono's housing and environmental protection programs. Part 4 contains detailed plans for how Orono will provide a balanced and appropriate level of public facilities and services, addressing transportation systems, sewer and water facilities, parks and open spaces, and the broad range of community services such as public safety, education, private utility and communications systems. Part 5 contains a brief description of ordinances and programs for implementation of the Plan, and expresses the City's commitment to coordination of services and programs with surrounding municipalities as well as other governmental agencies. Isanti Co Chisago CoSherburne Co Wright Co Anoka Co Washington CoHennepin Co Ramsey Co Carver Co Dakota CoScott Co Sibley Co Goodhue Co Le Sueur Co Rice Co Nicollet Co Orono St. PaulMinneapolis Map Document: \\arcserver1\gis\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_1-1_RegionalLocation_85x11P.mxd | Date Saved: 2/20/2018 10:14:06 AM2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Regional Location Map February 2018 Legend !I 0 10MilesSource: MnGeo St. Paul & Minneapolis Metro Counties Other Counties Map 1-1 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 2 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOUNDATION Historical Background 2-1 Table 2-1: Important Dates in Orono’s History 2-4 Community Demographic Profile 2-5 Chart 2-1: Population 2-7 Table 2-2: Orono Population, Households, & Employment 2-8 Table 2-3: Population Changes in Surrounding Communities 2-8 Table 2-4: Household Trends 2-9 Table 2-5: Population by Age 2-9 Table 2-6: Households by Current Age of Householder 2-10 Table 2-7: Household Income Ranges 2-10 Community Philosophy 2-10 Community Goals and Policies 2-12 Comprehensive Planning Strategy 2-18 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 3 CMP PART 2 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOUNDATION HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Every community has a unique character arising from its location, natural resources, history and population. Orono is no exception to this rule. But Orono's plan for the future may be exceptional, because its basic premise is the maintenance and furtherance of our very own unique features. Orono's corporate history dates to 1858 when Minnesota became a state, and western Hennepin County was surveyed and divided into townships. All of Orono south of Watertown Road was located in Excelsior Township, with the area north of Watertown Road being located in Medina Township. But the citizens of Orono, few as they were, found the going difficult in having to negotiate the lake in order to transact business in far-away Excelsior. So, in 1868, the townships were realigned with everything north of the Narrows becoming part of Medina. The separate Township of Orono was created out of the southern half of Medina on April 9, 1889. The name Orono was brought to the area by Major George Brackett, a native of Orono, Maine, who first used it to designate the area now known as Brackett's Point. Orono Township once included areas now part of neighboring cities. Minnetonka Beach was incorporated out of Medina Township in 1884. Long Lake was incorporated from Orono Township in 1906. Long Lake expanded, Wayzata grew westward, and then Spring Park was incorporated in 1952. Finally, effective January 1, 1955, Orono Village was incorporated encompassing all the remaining parts of the township including the settlements of Navarre, Crystal Bay, Orono and Bederwood (Stubbs Bay). A number of minor boundary changes have occurred since then, including detachment of the tip of Three Points Peninsula to Mound in 1963; annexation of small strip from Minnetrista in 1980 for McCulley Road; detachment of the Fleming Trail Addition to Long Lake in 1993; and annexation of property along North Ferndale and West Ferndale Roads from Wayzata in 1994 in exchange for detachment of a property along Highway 12 to accommodate Wayzata's public works facilities. The history of Orono's development is one of conversions: conversion of the Lake Minnetonka shoreline from Big Woods to summer homes in the late 1800's and early 1900's, a second conversion from lakeshore summer homes to year round residences since WWII; and conversion of the off-lake woods and prairie openings into farmland in the 19th century, with a more recent conversion from farms to low-density residential homesites beginning in the 1950's. Orono's first Township zoning regulations were adopted in 1950, and grew progressively more strict through the next two decades. Several residential and commercial zones were initially established, requiring minimum lot area and width standards, and defining allowable uses. The first wetland protection ordinance was established in 1963, about the same time that municipal sewers were first provided to the Navarre area. CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 4 Perhaps the single most important event that has shaped Orono's development in the last half-century was the City-wide rezoning in 1975. Much of the City had been zoned for residential development with 1-acre lots by 1967, with most of the Navarre area around Lake Minnetonka being zoned 1/2-acre, and a few areas in northeast Orono requiring 1-1/2 or 2-acre lot sizes. The 1975 rezoning took into account two important factors. First, that creating and maintaining a low density of development in the watershed is critical to preserving Lake Minnetonka; and second, that lots must be large enough to accommodate on- site sewage treatment systems on a permanent basis, due to the high cost of sewering and the "urbanization spiral". As a result, the 1975 rezoning established a minimum lot size of 2 acres (or 5 acres in northwest Orono) for 80% of Orono's land area. This had a dramatic effect not only in slowing development, but in effect capping the City's ultimate potential population at around 10,000 rather than the 30-40,000 that had been predicted under typical suburban development scenarios. Purposely Left Blank CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 5 Table 2-1: IMPORTANT DATES IN ORONO HISTORY 1803 The Louisiana Purchase: U.S. acquires 828,000 square miles of land from France for about 3¢ an acre 1822 W. J. Snelling and Joe Brown explore the upper reaches of Minnehaha Creek and sight Lake Minnetonka 1851 Treaty of Traverse des Sioux opens lands west of Mississippi for settlement; ratified by U.S. Senate in 1852 1852 Hennepin County organized; first township surveys conducted 1853 First settlers arrive in what is now Orono: Rev. Stephen Hull at 'The Narrows'; Stephen Bean of Maine at north shore of Stubbs Bay; John Carman at Spring Park; James and Francis Maxwell on Maxwell Bay. 1855 Arrival of many settlers in the Orono and Long Lake area: David Lydiard, Eleazer Dickey and Miles Bayer, all of Nova Scotia; the Edwin Turnham and George Maxwell families settle in Medina; the French, Fox and Fogelman families bring first horses to region; John Carman filed first subdivision in Orono, "Town of Tazaska" for land lying between North Arm, Forest Lake, West Arm and Crystal Bay, on May 3, 1855 1856 First sawmill in Orono on the Watertown Road, erected by Long Lake founder George Knettle; 'Tamarack' Post Office begun at home of Henry Stubbs; first stageline extended through Orono to Irvin Shrewsbury's corner in Independence 1858 Minnesota becomes 32nd state 1860 The Governor Ramsey, built by Charles Galpin, becomes first steamboat on Lake Minnetonka; many area roads surveyed by B.F. Christlieb, including "Harrington Road" (now Ferndale Road); final year that Chief Shakopee and his band of Sisseton Dakota winter at Teepee Hill (Union Cemetery ). 1861 Union Cemetery Association formed 1863 First church in area, Presbyterian Church of Medina, formed in the Old North (Lydiard) School, near Wolsfeld Lake. 1868 Railroad reaches Long Lake; land on north shore of Lake Minnetonka annexed from Excelsior township to Medina township 1870 Joel Stubbs patents sorghum processing unit, replacing wheat as major crop for a decade 1873 First dredging and widening of 'Hull's Narrows' opens upper lake for navigation 1880 George A. Brackett purchases 'Starvation Point' from Nathan Stubbs, renames it 'Orono Point' after boyhood home in Maine; Saga Hill colony begun on north shore of North Arm 1882 James J. Hill's spur line to Minnetonka Beach opens in conjunction with grand opening of Hotel Lafayette in June, 1882, helping to make Lake Minnetonka an internationally known resort destination; development grew up around the railroad stops such as Crystal Bay and Navarre 1884 Areas of Minnetonka Beach, Navarre and Spring Park added to Medina Township 1889 Town of Orono formed from parts of Medina and Excelsior Townships 1894 Village of Minnetonka Beach formed 1898 Formation of Minnetonka Fruit Growers Association 1906 Village of Long Lake incorporated, first telephone lines begun CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 6 1906 New Orono town hall constructed in Crystal Bay 1913 New library begun at Long Lake Bank 1917 St. George Catholic Church founded 1923 Leo Feser begins building Orono Golf Course 1932 Trinity Lutheran Church formed 1930's Drought hits midwest, Lake Minnetonka level drops 6 feet 1950 First Orono Township Zoning Ordinances adopted 1951 Village of Spring Park incorporated 1955 Orono becomes an incorporated village 1963 Orono sewer plant constructed near French Lake, Navarre area provided with municipal sewers 1965 May 6 - Tornado devastates parts of Orono, Navarre hard hit 1970 Navarre municipal water system constructed 1974 Orono becomes a city; new zoning ordinances enacted to maintain low density development ca. 1973 U.S. Highway 12 freeway section extended to Orono's eastern border 1980 Orono sewer plant decommissioned, replaced by Metro interceptor transporting Orono’s wastewater to Blue Lake Treatment Plant in Shakopee 1981 McCulley Road Ring Route opens to traffic providing an alternative to County Road 15 for east-west traffic 1989 Orono commemorates its Centennial Year 1992 Orono municipal offices, police, and public works relocated to new complex on Old Crystal Bay Road North across from Orono Schools 2000 Question of proposed consolidation with City of Long Lake receives positive response from Orono voters but fails in Long Lake 2000 William and Susan Lurton donate 39 acres for Passive, natural environmental park. 2001 City Council approves Orono Woods Senior Housing, creates first Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District 2006 Orono acquires Big Island Veterans Camp 2006 Navarre Fire Station 2 added 2008 Completion of new Highway 12 “Super 2” segment from Orono’s eastern border to County Road 6 2015 Lakeview Golf Course redeveloped as residential development 2015 City expands Hackberry Park as part of a living trust with the Gleason Family 2016 Dayton property, one of the last Big Woods parcels, develops as estate residential. Sources: Excerpts from "Orono, Minnesota 1889-1989: 100 Years By the Waters of Minnetonka" edited by James R. Roehl; Excerpts from "Picturesque Minnetonka" published by Excelsior-Lake Minnetonka Historical Society, 1976; City files. CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 7 COMMUNITY DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE The population of Orono was estimated by the Met Council in 2016 as 7,691. This represents an increase of 254 people since 2010. Total number of households was estimated to be 3,037 in 2016, and increase from the 2,826 households reported in 2010. The persons per household has decreased steadily since 1970, then a high of 3.43 persons per household to 2.529 estimated now. The following Chart 2-1 illustrates Orono’s relatively rapid growth during the period 1920-1950 (averaging around 60% per decade); a decline in the rate of growth from 1950 to 1970 (slowing to 20% per decade); and relatively slow growth since 1970 (less than 5% per decade). This slow rate of growth is expected to continue for the next 20 years based on the City’s current zoning and planned land use and the amount of undeveloped property. Orono is primarily a bedroom community, with 70% of its land area guided for residential use. Annual population increases over the last 30 years have averaged less than 1% per year. Table 2-2 shows this growth in Households, Population, and Employment since 1970. Chart 2-1 Sources: U.S. Census 1920-2000; Met Council Systems Statement Forecasts 2010-2040 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 est. 2030 est. 2040 est. Population CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 8 Source: U.S. Census, Metropolitan Council Surrounding communities have undergone varied rates of population increase in recent decades, as shown in Table 2-3. Among cities that have a smaller geographic area that has been developed for many years (Long Lake, Mound, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Wayzata) the population increase over the period 1970- 2010 has been relatively small, ranging from 0%-20%, with Spring Park being the anomaly in that it grew by nearly 54%, due to the construction of many multi-family housing units. Among those cities that have a larger geographic area approaching township size, the population increase for Independence, Minnetrista, & Medina was approximately 77 to 122%, with Plymouth and Orono at opposite ends of a much wider range. While Plymouth more than quadrupled its population over 30 years, Orono’s increased by only 10%. Table 2-3: Population Change in Surrounding Communities 1960-2000 COMMUNITY 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Percentage Increase 2000- 2010 Percentage Increase 1970- 2010 Independence 1,446 1,993 2,640 2,822 3,236 3,524 9% 77% Long Lake 996 1,506 1,747 1,984 1,842 1,780 -3% 18% Medina 1,472 2,396 2,623 3,096 4,005 4,903 22% 105% Minnetonka Beach 544 586 575 573 614 522 -15% -11% Minnetrista 2,211 2,878 3,236 3,439 4,358 6,384 46% 122% Mound 5,440 7,572 9,280 9,634 9,435 9,045 -4% 19% Orono 5,643 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 -1% 10% Plymouth 9,576 18,077 31,615 50,889 65,894 70,720 7% 291% Spring Park 668 1,087 1,465 1,571 1,717 1,674 -3% 54% Tonka Bay 1,204 1,397 1,354 1,472 1,547 1,486 -4% 6% Wayzata 3,219 3,700 3,621 3,806 4,113 3,692 -10% 0% Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Population 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 8,100 8,800 9,500 Households 1,976 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,200 3,560 3,900 Persons per Household 3.43 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.47 2.44 Employment 500 809 980 951 1,562 1,700 1,780 1,800 Table 2-2: Orono Population, Households, & Employment 1970 - 2040 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 9 Table 2-4 illustrates that household sizes have been decreasing steadily since 1970, to an anticipated level of 2.44 in 2040. Table 2-4: Household Trends Year Households Percent Change in Households Household growth Household Size (persons per household) 1970 1976 ---- 3.43 1980 2291 15.94% 315 2.99 1990 2613 14.05% 322 2.79 2000 2763 5.74% 150 2.73 2010 2862 3.58% 99 2.63 2020 (Est.) 3200 11.81% 338 2.53 2030 (Est.) 3560 11.25% 360 2.47 2040 (Est.) 3900 9.55% 340 2.44 Sources: 1970-2010 US Census Data; City records; Met Council forecasts Population by Age Table 2-5 indicates the range in ages of Orono’s population in 1990, 2000, and 2010. The Table also includes the Metropolitan Area’s age breakdown in 2010. The average age in 1990 was 35 years with the median age being slightly higher at 36 years. As of the 2000 US Census, the median age had climbed substantially to 40.7 years, as compared to 34.2 years for the Twin Cities area. Table 2-5: Orono Population by Age, 1990, 2000 and 2010 Age Range 1990 Percentage 2000 Percentage 2010 Percentage Twin Cities MSA 0-4 484 6.60% 453 6.00% 344 4.63% 4.57% 5-9 549 7.50% 577 7.70% 580 7.80% 7.39% 10-14 542 7.40% 639 8.50% 664 8.93% 6.92% 15-19 487 6.70% 543 7.20% 532 7.15% 6.93% 20-24 302 4.10% 187 2.50% 181 2.43% 6.80% 25-34 978 13.40% 597 7.90% 400 5.38% 14.49% 35-44 1483 20.30% 1414 18.80% 914 12.29% 13.70% 45-54 1199 16.50% 1578 20.90% 1559 20.96% 14.66% 55-64 643 8.90% 874 11.60% 1323 17.79% 12.42% 65-74 408 5.60% 420 5.60% 587 7.89% 6.67% 75-84 162 2.20% 206 2.70% 269 3.62% 3.30% 85+ 48 0.70% 50 0.70% 84 1.13% 1.12% 7,285 7,538 7,437 Sources: 1990 & 2000 U.S. Census, Metropolitan Council CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 10 In 2010, Orono’s median household income was $111,000 compared to that of the seven county metro area ($65,200), as shown in Table 2-7. In 2016, the gap widened, $119,400 to $70,900. Table 2-7: Median Household Income Orono 7 County Region 1990 Census $ 62,900.000 $ 36,600.00 2000 Census $ 88,300.000 $ 54,300.00 ACS 2006-2010 $ 111,000.000 $ 65,200.00 ACS 2012-2016 $ 119,400.000 $ 70,900.00 Source: US Census and American Community Survey COMMUNITY PHILOSOPHY Orono's Community Management Plan is a statement by the citizens as to what we are, where we have been, and where we are going. Orono will retain its own special identity through careful growth management in the best interest of the environment, the natural resources, the watershed of Lake Minnetonka and the community of citizens, both present and future. Orono's past growth and development patterns have been greatly influenced by the extensive and varied natural features found within our borders. Map 3B-2a in the Land Use Section of this Plan indicates the pattern of land use as it exists today. It is apparent that development has been drawn by the lakes and clustered by the many bays and marshes. The most significant resource is Lake Minnetonka. The largest lake in the metropolitan Twin Cities 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ Population by Age 1990 2000 2010 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 11 area, Minnetonka has 22.4 square miles of surface area and approximately 130 miles of shoreline running along numerous bays, channels and inlets. Lake Minnetonka's watershed, including the Lake itself, encompasses 123 square miles, and approximately 1/5 of the contributing watershed lies in Orono. Orono has two distinct personalities: The historically developed lakeshore and the rural woods, fields and open spaces. Both areas are primarily residential in nature, relying upon the existing town center of Navarre and other nearby cities such as Long Lake, Spring Park, Wayzata, Mound and Maple Plain for shopping, employment, and entertainment activities. The concern of the residents is to provide for continuing maintenance and preservation of those natural resources and social amenities which attracted people to Orono in the first place. Near the lake, density of development has to be regulated in order to minimize the resultant stormwater runoff pollution which, if unrestricted, could permanently alter and destroy the ecology of this very unique resource. Away from the lake, the natural marshes and wetlands are to be protected as the primary and most practical method of storm water filtration and enhancement. Steep slopes will be protected from over-development and erosion. Woodlands will be preserved as wildlife habitat, erosion protection, noise barriers and places for personal solitude and contentment. Orono's primary goal of preserving the water quality and level of Lake Minnetonka can only be accomplished by maintaining the basic integrity of the natural watershed. Open space is to be cherished and protected. In urbanized areas, recreational needs go hand-in-hand with the necessities of light, air, and solar access. Views of the lakeshore are invaluable property rights and personal experiences. In rural areas, the open fields and pastures are witness to the rural lifestyles active in Orono, and each property owner has the ability to provide for his own varied recreational needs. Institutional and commercial needs have been met by the existing centers with no need for future expansion. The geographic relationships between the many lake area communities expand the services available to Orono residents beyond the City’s borders. The many industrial, retail-commercial and health care facilities readily accessible locally and regionally are adequate to serve the needs of Orono residents. School populations are increasing slowly, and new technologies and program demands require some expansion of existing facilities but no new centers. Orono's population growth has been historically slow, allowing for gradual service increases and fiscal security. Public facilities have been provided and will continue to be improved at a level sufficient for protection of health and safety, but unobtrusively enough to allow continued self- independence and maintenance of rural lifestyles. The basic philosophies of the CMP are to the extent possible consistent with the policies and guidelines contained in the Metropolitan Council's “2040 Regional Development Framework”. Future urban density in the urban area along the lake is to be in-fill development where existing urban services are available. Rural land use in the low-density residential lakeshore areas and in the area away from the lake, is to be free from expanded urban services except when necessary to protect the public health or to eliminate negative impacts to surface and groundwaters. In all neighborhoods, provisions are made for protection of environmental assets and for provision of open space and recreational amenities. Housing opportunities in and near Orono are available in a wide range of alternatives consistent with the availability of public services. Existing and planned sewer and transportation facilities are capable of servicing the planned density of development, and land use patterns are consistent with and complementary to those of neighboring cities. CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 12 Orono's managed growth policy means that the need to use and enjoy Lake Minnetonka will be balanced with protection of its water quality and accessibility for future generations. This policy means that the acceptance of growth and development changes will be balanced with conservation of our resources and natural amenities, and maintenance of our small town social character. Orono intends to remain two communities in one. The historically developed area around and near the Lake Minnetonka shoreline has been called "Urban" because of historic developed density with lots typically one acre in area or smaller and the availability of a limited level of urban services. The area away from the Lake has been termed "Rural" because of the lack of density, the abundance of open space and the citizens' commitment to maintain this type of development. The majority of Orono's 'Rural Area' has been zoned to require a minimum of 2 acres of dry buildable land per residential lot, with an area in the northwest corner of the City requiring at least 5 dry buildable acres. When wetlands and roads are factored in, nearly 80% of the City’s land will be developed at densities averaging from approximately 1 unit per 3 gross acres up to 1 unit per 7 gross acres, sufficient to meet the City's environmental protection goals. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area ("MUSA") was established by Metropolitan Council to define the extent of areas where urban services will be provided and urban scale development will occur. As part of its Metro 2040 Regional Growth Strategy developed in 1996, Metropolitan Council for discussion purposes suggested that all but the northwestern tip of Orono will be in the MUSA by 2020. However, the City Council in the City’s 2000-2020 CMP included a much smaller area within the MUSA to be consistent with the extent of City-planned municipal sewer extensions, and to be consistent with the development plans of our neighboring municipalities. Map 3B-1in the Land Use Chapter depicts Orono's defined “Urban” areas (where zoning density will range from 1 unit per acre to as many as 25 units per acre) and its “Rural” areas (where ultimate developed density will range from 1 unit per 5 acres to 1 unit per 2 acres). Orono’s 2010-2030 MUSA as approved by Met Council in 2008 reflect a clear intent to bring municipal sewer to lakeshore and shoreland areas where needed, as well as to existing concentrations of population where septic systems may not be suitable for the long-term. But most of all, Orono citizens have located the MUSA line and have defined the urban and rural areas to be consistent with their plans for permanent use and development of the City. COMMUNITY GOALS AND POLICIES The goals and policies of this plan have met the test of time in Orono. The basic premise of maintaining distinct urban and rural neighborhoods continues a hundred-year tradition. The commitment to environmental preservation remains uppermost in the list of priorities of Orono's residents. The inter- reliance of lake area communities for shopping and commercial needs, for housing variety and for provision of basic public services is both historic and economically practical. The following goals and policies reflect the basic philosophies of Orono. Goals and policies affecting the entire City are grouped in an "overall" category. In addition, more detailed goals and policies are separated under their appropriate "urban" or "rural" classification. Finally, each separate CMP chapter has detailed goals and policies relating to that particular subject. GENERAL GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Planning Goals CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 13 1. The foremost guiding principle and goal of Orono's planning is to protect and preserve Lake Minnetonka, and all Lakes and natural resources, its water quality, and its recreational assets. This goal continues a commitment established half a century ago. It includes preservation of the associated marshes, wetlands and natural drainageways as the primary, most practical and cost efficient method of preventing flooding and of filtering out the nutrient pollution from stormwater runoff. Maintaining a low-density rural area away from the lake, and managing the quality of runoff that flows directly to the lake, are important elements of this goal. 2. To retain the existing urban-rural land use pattern on a permanent basis. 3. To maintain our local character and identity. This local character is defined by strong neighborhoods, preponderance of wildlife, open spaces, lakes, and wetlands. 4. To protect and preserve our many natural resources including all lakes, creeks, marshes, wetlands, woodlands, groundwater and steep slopes. 5. To preserve open space, light, air, and solar access for all citizens while maintaining night sky. 6. To protect the general public health, safety and welfare through the development of ordinances, policies, and infrastructure that provides safe, efficient streets and neighborhoods, transportation alternatives, parks and opens spaces. 7. To guide investment and reinvestment in the City at densities consistent with environmental protection and the planned land use pattern. The city’s focus is in development and redevelopment is preservation of established character, rather than the creation of a new character. 8. To protect the financial stability of the City, providing an adequate level of services at efficient cost to the taxpayer. Orono's Planning Policies 1. Future development will be guided to protect and enhance the Lake Minnetonka watershed. Lake Minnetonka has local and regional significance as a vital ingredient in human experience and in the quality of life of all Orono residents. No development will be permitted that would have a detrimental effect on the Lake. 2. Urbanization will not be expanded into the existing rural areas. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan, and therefore the Urban area will not be expanded into the Rural Area. Urban services will not be expanded into the Rural Area except when necessary to protect the public health, or to avoid or eliminate negative impacts to surface and groundwaters. 3. The existing and planned Urban Area is fixed. Orono's Urban Area is fixed by the various elements of the Community Management Plan, and is shown on Map 3B-1. CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 14 4. The boundary between Orono's Urban and Rural areas is not strictly defined by the MUSA boundary. The boundary between Orono's Urban and Rural areas is defined by the density of development and level of public services intended to be provided. Orono will not define its Urban and Rural areas based merely on whether municipal sewer is provided. The MUSA boundary has been amended by the City in the past to allow for retrofitting of existing Rural Area neighborhoods with municipal sewer, to solve existing sewage treatment problems. In these areas, the zoning has not changed to allow for additional development at urban densities, and urban services other than sewer have not been provided. 5. Future expansions of the sewer system into the Rural Area to solve existing neighborhood sewage treatment problems or along the lakeshore to avoid or eliminate potential negative impacts on lake water quality will not result in a reclassification of those neighborhoods from Rural to Urban. Expansion of the sewer system into the Rural Area will not result in the provision of additional urban services, nor will it result in changes to allowed development densities. 6. Additional urban development will occur only in the designated Urban Area. Additional urban development will occur in the urbanized areas consistent with the capacities of the existing urban services and at limited densities consistent with all environmental constraints. 7. Additional rural development will occur in the designated Rural Area. Additional rural residential and quasi-agricultural development can occur in the rural areas without taxing the limited capacities of existing rural services. Rural development will occur at limited densities consistent with self-supporting on-site sewer and water services and with maintenance of natural amenities, open space and other rural community characteristics. 8. Natural features and sensitive environments will be protected by ordinances based upon extensive inventory, analysis and established environmental protection guidelines. Natural resource information will be used and evaluated in review of all significant land use developments. Ordinance provisions will be reasonably established, fairly interpreted and strictly enforced. 9. Historically significant buildings, places and settings will be identified and preserved. The character of Orono receives much of its identity from our unique pattern of development. Individual sites provide a glimpse into the past and are a valuable addition to Orono Character. These sites include the Orono Golf Course, and the Pillsbury Summer House. Programs will be established to identify and help preserve this heritage for future generations. Where necessary, special consideration will be made to encourage retention of significant public or private amenities. 10. Housing programs will be pursued to provide safe, affordable homes for all citizens. Housing opportunities will be provided for citizens of all ages and income CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 15 levels either within Orono or within the adjacent town centers of Long Lake and Spring Park where the necessary support services for a wider range of housing opportunities are readily available. Rehabilitation programs will be identified and stressed to increase the livability and energy efficiency of the existing housing stock. 11. Transportation facilities will be provided and improved consistent with local service needs and with a coordinated program of area-wide transportation priorities. Transportation planning will be sensitive to local land use and environmental concerns, and to local service needs. Through traffic adds significant traffic level through limited corridors through the lake region. The city will encourage its transportation partners to develop and implement improvements and transportation alternatives to ensure safe and efficient travel. Levels of maintenance will vary between urban and rural areas. Alternative routings and alternative transportation modes will be explored. 12. Programs and services will be coordinated between the many interrelated governmental agencies. Orono will continue to pursue coordinated services with the County, with adjacent municipalities, with the school districts and with specialized districts such as lake conservation, watershed or joint powers districts, all for the purpose of providing consistent, high quality services at affordable cost to the taxpayer. 13. Orono strives to establish a low profile governmental presence emphasizing individual citizen responsibility rather than over- inclusive governmental authority. Orono recognizes that the individual citizen often can do for himself more quickly, efficiently and at lesser cost, things that in other areas are left to government by default. It is here that the strength of the Orono citizens has its most direct benefit in maintaining our rural, small-town vitality. 14. Orono will continue to emphasize active citizen participation in policy formation and policy administration. Local meetings have always had the friendly, open-door characteristic of New England Town Meetings. Communication with the residents, both on general matters and on specific neighborhood development proposals, will continue to be a priority policy of this Plan and of this City. Education will continue to be a critical element in establishment and administration of City policies. 15. It is Orono's firm conviction that the goals, policies and programs outlined in this CMP undeniably in the best interests of all Orono citizens, both current and future. This Plan emphasizes full use of existing public services and facilities without leap-frog expansion of unnecessary services into Orono's rural areas. This Plan reinforces the national concern for energy conservation through retrofitting and rehabilitation of existing structures, through coordinated transportation planning and through emphasis on natural rather than mechanical solutions to storm water and waste water treatment. This Plan emphasizes reliance on and efficient use of natural features and existing services rather than arbitrary duplication of efforts between competing municipalities. This Plan is built on understanding and acceptance of Orono's unique location and environmental constraints. Working with these factors will improve our quality of life; ignoring them would destroy it. This plan serves future residents of CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 16 Orono through the preserve and enhancement of the uniqueness of Orono. Urban Area Goals and Policies Urban Community Goals 1. To maintain the identity and small town character of the individual neighborhoods. Urban developments will be developed to continue the architecturally diverse house pattern previously established. 2. To provide opportunities for neighborhood commerce, education and social facilities to serve Orono's urban and rural residents alike. 3. To improve the quality of life and neighborhood aesthetics while maintaining the existing diversity of housing and shopping opportunities. 4. To prevent overly dense development or any excessive demand for services which would in any way adversely affect Lake Minnetonka or its associated wetlands or drainage areas. 5. To provide municipal facilities and services at a level consistent with small town urban requirements. Urban Planning Policies 1. Future urban development will be carefully integrated into the existing neighborhoods. 2. The City will encourage commercial facilities and social centers that complement the existing available services. The city recognizes the value commercial facilities and social centers have on the quality of life for Orono residents. The City will favor those developments oriented toward local neighborhood needs, recognizing the integrated service area of all adjoining lake-area communities. 3. Private landowners and developers will be encouraged to improve the image of their neighborhoods. Programs will be pursued to encourage maintenance and upkeep of all properties and to promote the rehabilitation of older or under-used properties. Commercial areas will be encouraged to provide a coordinated approach to identity, aesthetic and neighborhood appeal. 4. Urban developments will be screened for environmental sensitivity. Most of Orono's urban neighborhoods are located very close to Lake Minnetonka; therefore any urban development has the potential for direct adverse impact on the lake. Storm water runoff control, erosion and sedimentation are particular concerns requiring careful design attention in all new urban developments. In addition, particular care will be taken to preserve open spaces, wooded areas and solar access. CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 17 5. Urban developments will be limited to the extent that they can be adequately served by the existing or planned public facilities and services. New development will not be permitted to exceed the existing or planned capacity of local roads, utilities, parks, police and fire protection. Where development within the urban area requires local extension of roads or utilities, such extension will be the full responsibility of the developer, not the general taxpayer. 6. Higher levels of public services will be provided in the urban area than in the rural area. The greater land use density and the greater number of residents combine to require more intensive levels of public services. Police, fire, and ambulance calls are more frequent. Roads, parking lots, parks, and playgrounds require more maintenance. Public sewer and water is necessary because of population density and proximity to the lake. All of these factors combine to increase the cost of government in the urban portions of the city. Rural Area Goals and Policies Rural Community Goals 1. To maintain the rural character of open spaces and closeness to the natural environment. 2. To retain the opportunity for rural commerce such as farming, orchards, greenhouses, stables and similar activities which require limited services but relatively large amounts of open space. 3. To retain the opportunity for a diversity of housing types and alternative use expectations. 4. To prevent the encroachment of urban development or any activity which would in any way adversely affect Lake Minnetonka or its associated watershed. 5. To evaluate public service requests so as to limit the financial burdens on the community and the landowners alike. Rural Planning Policies 1. Future rural developments will be guided so as to have minimal impact on the land or on the existing rural neighborhoods. Rural developments will be permitted only at rural densities and only where the land is capable of self-supporting the necessary on-site sewer and water services. Care will be exercised to ensure that no new development encroaches upon its neighbor's open space activities. 2. Rural neighborhoods will be reserved for low-density residential and quasi- agricultural land uses. Commercial services will continue to be provided in the urban areas of Orono and adjoining municipalities. No new commercial or industrial activities will be permitted in the rural service area except those quasi-agricultural uses that do not require central sewer or other urban services. CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 18 3. Rural developments will be screened for environmental sensitivity. Most of Orono's rural land includes major or minor drainageways and wetlands all intricately tied to Lake Minnetonka. Therefore, each rural development will require particular care to prevent encroachment on these vital resources and to ensure protection of the soil vegetation and drainage patterns. In addition, consideration will be given to protection of woodlands and special open vistas having general public benefit, as well as protection and enhancement of drainageways and water quality; protection and enhancement of ecological communities; reinforcement and establishment of ecological connections throughout the City; augmentation and preservation of enclosure and buffering; preservation and improvement of views; and preservation or reinterpretation of local landmarks. 4. Rural developments will be limited to the extent that they can be served by the existing or planned public facilities and services. New development will not be permitted if it requires the extension of unplanned urban services into the rural area. Privately constructed and maintained roads and recreational facilities will be favored over requirements for additional public facilities. Buildings and structures must be located and designed for rural levels of police and fire protection. 5. Special planning considerations are required for those rural areas located on Lake Minnetonka islands. It is impossible for the City to provide island residents with normal public services such as police, fire, ambulance, sanitation or transportation. Therefore, all of these needs must be met by the individual property owners who choose to develop land on the islands. Because of this combination of factors, the City has determined that private island development must be managed in a manner that allows for private individual use of recreational property only in strict compliance with enhanced development and environmental performance standards applicable specifically to the islands. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING STRATEGY PLANNING GOALS 1. To identify community characteristics, needs, issues and aspirations. 2. To formulate and maintain long-term goals for future community growth and management. 3. To formulate and maintain policies, ordinances and programs designed to implement the community goals. 4. To continue, rather than change, the direction of development and preservation established by previous Community Management Plans. PLANNING POLICIES 1. The CMP is designed as a management tool for city officials, staff and citizens in the conduct of both public and private activity within the city. 2. The CMP is designed to encourage effective and coordinated methods of implementation to CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 19 properly balance private incentives and the protection of the public interest. 3. The CMP is designed to help coordinate the various implementation tools such as regulations, ordinances, public procedures, and public expenditures. 4. The CMP is intended to be a living document to be used on a day to day basis. 5. The CMP is intended to be reviewed and updated when necessary. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 3A ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN Environmental Protection Plan 3A-2 Table 3A-1: Lake Minnetonka Physical Statistics 3A-4 Table 3A-2: Lake Sizes 3A-4 Table 3A-3: Streams 3A-5 Orono’s Natural Resources 3A-7 Figure 3A-1: Land Cover 3A-9 Orono as a Rural Oasis 3A-10 Surface Water Management Plan 3A-11 Flood plain Management 3A-14 Shoreland Management 3A-14 Solar Access Protection 3A-14 Table 3A-4: Solar Potential 3A-14 Figure 3A-2: Solar Potential 3A-15 Quality of Life Preservation 3A-17 Environmental Protection Policies 3A-17 Appendices Map 3A-1: Lake Minnetonka Map 3A-2: Wetlands and Drainageways Map 3A-3: Soil Associations Map 3A-4: MLCCS Level 1 Land Cover Map 3A-5: Flood Map Map 3A-6: Shoreland Overlay Appendix 3A-A Surface Water Management Plan CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 2 CMP PART 3(A) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN The presence and character of relatively undisturbed natural resource areas including lakes, marshes, wetlands, and woodlands is a major factor affecting the character of Orono. LAKE MINNETONKA  Lake Minnetonka is the single most significant natural feature in Orono and in the entire western part of Hennepin County. Lake Minnetonka, as shown on Map 3A-1, is actually a series of separate lakes or "bays" interconnected by narrows or channels. The outlet of Lake Minnetonka is at Gray's Bay in the City of Minnetonka, where it discharges to Minnehaha Creek which eventually flows into the Mississippi River.  Lake Minnetonka has substantial public value as a recreational asset, as an environmental resource and as a setting for private residential development.  Lake Minnetonka is dependent upon watershed runoff for all replenishment. All water is received from precipitation falling within the immediate watershed. Most of this water enters the Lake by direct runoff through a series of five major streams and their associated lakes, marshland and sub-watersheds.  Lake Minnetonka's ecology makes it easily susceptible to pollution hazards. The combination of a single-source local water supply, relatively small watershed area, many channel restrictions between separate bays, and a single outlet, have resulted in Lake Minnetonka having an extremely long 25-year flush out period for complete water change. The hazard is that once pollutants enter the Lake, they tend to remain for a long time and they are not easily diluted.  Lake Minnetonka has historically suffered from two problems which directly affect its environmental health and its value as a public amenity. One problem which has been worsening with urbanization trends is a deterioration in water quality caused by eutrophication. Eutrophication is the aging process by which natural waters are enriched with nutrients that may stimulate excessive plant growth, including floating algae, attached algae, and rooted weeds. Eutrophication may occur naturally, as sediments accumulate in lake basins over geologic time or it may be induced artificially as a result of human activities, as in Lake Minnetonka. Much of Lake Minnetonka has become more eutrophic during the past century, but sedimentation has been negligible. Instead, the accelerated eutrophication of the Lake, which is due to increased inputs of nutrient elements, particularly phosphorus and nitrogen, is evidenced by the increased growth of algae and weeds. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 3  The other problem is hydrologic instability. Because the lake level is dependent upon precipitation, wide ranges in water elevation have occurred over the years. During the 1930's, a general drought left the lake below normal level for 11 years with a maximum decline of more than 6 feet.  In recent years, however, more urbanization has increased the amounts of direct storm water runoff resulting in high water levels and in some cases flooding problems for low-lying properties. Management of runoff and protection of water quality have now become primary objectives of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Map 3A-1 illustrates Lake Minnetonka’s relationship with the city of Orono.  The problems of Lake Minnetonka were intensively studied by many agencies in the 1960's and 1970's. These agencies included the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the City of Orono. The major publications addressing Minnetonka's problems and which formed the basis for the goals and policies of Orono's 1980, 2000-2020, and 2010-2030 CMPs, and this update, are as follows: 1969 Overall Plan for Water Management; MCWD 1971 "Harza Study", A Program for Preserving the Quality of Lake Minnetonka; LMCD & Mn. PCA 1973 Shoreland Management Regulations of the Mn. DNR 1973 Stormwater Impact Investigation for the Metropolitan Council 1974 Surface Water Management Plan for the City of Orono 1979 208 Water Quality Management Plan for the Metropolitan Council  Orono's special involvement with Lake Minnetonka is based upon the real concerns of our affected citizens and our intimate and important impact on the total lake environment. While Orono's population is not as large as that of other municipalities in the Lake Minnetonka Watershed, Orono does have the largest land area and potential environmental impact of any local unit of government. Orono is the largest city totally within the Watershed. Orono has one-sixth of the total dry land in the watershed, one-eighth of the wetlands and one-third of the lake surface. Orono encompasses one-third of Lake Minnetonka's total shoreline. Over 30% of the total Watershed's surface runoff flows through or from Orono on its way to the Lake. No other community has the same potential as Orono for affecting Lake Minnetonka's water quality or water quantity, therefore, no other single community has as heavy a responsibility for careful protection of this general resource as Orono. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 4 Table 3A-1: Lake Minnetonka Physical Statistics Lake Minnetonka Portion within City of Orono % in Orono Water Surface Area 14,300 acres 4,750 acres 33% Shoreline Length 131 miles¹ 40.4 miles² 31% Watershed Area 71 sq. mi. dry land 22 sq. mi. wetlands 7 sq. mi. other water bodies 23 sq. mi. basin of Lk. Mtka 123 sq. mi. 13.4 sq. mi. 2.7 sq. mi. 0.6 sq. mi. 7.4 sq. mi. 24.1 sq. mi. 19% 12% 9% 32% 20% ¹ MCWD Water Resources Management Plan ²City calculation ORONO’S LAKES, CREEKS AND WETLANDS Other significant lakes in Orono include Long Lake, Mooney Lake, Lydiard Lake, Lake Classen and Dickey's Lake. Lydiard Lake and Dickey's Lake drain into Long Lake which flows into Long Lake Creek and eventually Tanager Lake (bay) of Lake Minnetonka. Lake Classen drains into Stubbs Bay of Lake Minnetonka and Mooney Lake drains through Plymouth and Wayzata before discharging into Wayzata Bay of Lake Minnetonka. Table 3A-2 below provides some general information on all of Orono’s lakes. Table 3A-2: Lake Sizes and Shoreland Classifications Lake Classification Total Basin Area (Acres) Basin Area in City of Orono (Acres) OHWL DNR MPCA Protected Waters Inventory Number Impaired Water Natural Environment (NE) Lake Classen 117 117 974.5' 27-162 N Dickeys Lake 20.6 20.6 974.5' 27-161 N French Lake (South Basin Only) (Includes 78 ac. wetlands) 26 26 985.5' 27-140 Y Lydiard Lake 89 89 930.0' 27-159 N (Includes 20 ac. wetlands) Lake Katrina 133 26 970.9' 27-154 N (Includes 26 ac. wetlands in Orono) Recreational Development (RD) Long Lake 320 210 944.3' 27-160 N Mooney Lake 118 10 988.0' 27-134 Y Tanager Lake (Part of Lk Mtka) -74 -74 929.4' 27-149 Y General Development (GD) Forest Lake (Part of Lk Mtka) -127 -127 929.4' 27-133 Y Lake Minnetonka 14,310 4,750 929.4' 27-133 Y Source: City Records, DNR, MPCA Impaired waters list, 2014 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 5 Lydiard Lake is the most rural of Orono's lakes, being surrounded by heavily wooded rolling hills. Dickey's Lake has become surrounded by low density residential development over the past 30 years. Lake Classen is surrounded by orchards, woods and open fields with a handful of homes overlooking its’ waters. The Orono School District maintains a nature study area and waterfowl ponds on Classen's east shore. Mooney Lake's shore is relatively undeveloped in Orono and Medina, but the lake’s watershed has received growing pressures from urbanization in Plymouth, including usage conflicts, elevation concerns due to lack of a natural outlet, and urban storm water pollution inflow. Long Lake is the second largest and 2nd most actively used lake in Orono. The east and west shores have been developed at rural residential densities. The north shore has mixed rural residential areas and one denser housing cluster dating from the 1930's. The south shore is bordered by the City of Long Lake and is urbanized to the same degree as much of Lake Minnetonka. Long Lake has experienced storm water problems as well as increased usage pressures. In recent years, the expansion of Carp and other fish have suspended solids, degrading water quality. The Cities of Medina, Long Lake, and Orono have agreed to study the issue. Orono also has identified a number of protected tributary streams which are subject to Shoreland regulations. These are shown in the following table: Source: City Records, MPCA The second most significant and most universal natural amenity in Orono is its many wetlands and marshlands comprising Lake Minnetonka's upland drainage system. Orono's nearly 1600 acres of marshland and wetlands comprise fully one-sixth of the City's land area. Map 3A-2 indicates how the marshland and drainageways are scattered throughout the City. Section Township Range Section Township Range Long Lake Creek 35 (Basin 160-P)118 23 10(Basin 141-P)117 23 N "Wolsfeld" Creek 27 (City limit)118 23 26(Basin 160-P)118 23 Y Tributary to Wolsfeld Creek from Holy Name Lake 26 (City limit)118 23 27 118 23 Dickeys Lake Creek 27 (Basin 161-P)118 23 34 (Basin 160-P)118 23 N Stubbs Bay Creek (aka Classen Creek)32 (Basin 162-P)118 23 5 (Basin 133-P)117 23 N Painter's Creek 30 (Basin 154-P)118 23 31 (City limit)118 23 Y Tributary Name From:To:Impaired Water Table 3A-3: Protected Tributary Streams CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 6 These natural ponding areas serve an integral function within the natural ecological system of Lake Minnetonka. The "Harza Study" includes quantitative data identifying how the wetland soils easily retain phosphorus, and how marsh plants take up and incorporate large amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus into their growing tissue. Thus, the marshlands are the primary pollution filters for Lake Minnetonka's surface water runoff. Since marshes and small lakes in the watershed aggregate nearly as much area as the main body of Lake Minnetonka, their potential for supplying water to the subsurface formations is appreciable. In addition, marshes provide diversity in the kinds of open space available within the region. They provide a habitat which is uniquely suited for certain birds and mammals. They can be utilized to provide storage of storm runoff with minimal disruption to their function as a habitat for wildlife and their ability to reduce the phosphorus input to the lake. Development Impacts on Wetlands. When urban development occurs, the function of the natural drainageways and filtration system is adversely affected in three ways: The speed and quantity of the storm water runoff are increased as the absorption ability of the land is eliminated with hardcover (houses, driveways, roads, etc.). This increase in the speed and quantity of storm water runoff causes the third adverse effect, which is the increase of the amount of nutrients which are contained in the storm water runoff which now has less time in the natural marsh filtration system to be purified before entering the lake. Nutrients contained in dying vegetation, lawn fertilizers, and from other urban sources are discharged into the lake faster and in greater quantities as the level of urbanization increases. (Harza Study) Orono does not rely solely on the ability of the natural filtration system of the marshes and drainageways to purify storm water so necessary for the preservation of Lake Minnetonka. Supplementary Stormwater Ponding & Alternatives. While Orono's Surface Water Management Plan adopted in 2002 places a significant emphasis on preservation of wetlands, it also provides for the establishment of supplementary stormwater management ponds to help counteract the impacts of development within the watershed. NURP (National Urban Runoff Program) pond design criteria are primarily based on the removal of suspended particles such as sand, silt, etc. Secondary design criteria enhance the capability of NURP ponds to remove other pollutants such as trace metals, hydrocarbons, nutrients (such as phosphorus) and pesticides. Phosphorus is mainly removed through biological uptake in algae and aquatic plants. When the algae die, the nutrients fall to the bottom of the pond and become part of the sediments. Ponds in the Twin Cities area designed according to NURP standards have total phosphorus removal efficiencies of 47 to 68 percent according to Walker. Possibilities for improving this include (1) increasing mean pond depth; (2) promoting infiltration; (3) promoting plug flow conditions (i.e. multiple cell ponds); (4) applying chemicals to precipitate out the ortho-phosphorus (alum treatments); (5) encouraging growth of certain aquatic plants; and (6) design of outlet structure to provide extended detention of large runoff events. Whether each of these enhancements can or should be incorporated is dependent on the desired level of control and other site specific conditions. Constructed wetlands have potential benefits as well as drawbacks. Additionally, the cost of constructing stormwater ponds and storm sewer systems is enormous compared to the cost of wetland preservation. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 7 Vegetated buffers, green strips adjacent to hard surfaces, permeable pavements that incorporate runoff treatment features, and rain gardens are just some of the additional tools available for supplementing runoff management. Nutrient management technologies such as NURP ponds or alum treatments will give Orono an added tool to manage runoff from rural densities, but Orono will not rely solely on man-made systems for preserving water quality. ORONO’S NATURAL RESOURCES Soils Orono's land forms are highly varied as the result of four separate glacial scourings. Surface features include islands, peninsulas, narrow land bridges, the lakes, bays and marshes, and a few shallow outwash basins. The highest elevations range from about 1060 feet above mean sea level in the northern part of the City down to the normal water level of Lake Minnetonka at elevation 929.4 MSL. The soils in the City of Orono (Map 3A-3) originated from drift materials deposited by meltwaters of the glaciers. Generally, the soil types consist primarily of clay and loam materials on the uplands and organic, wet materials in the lowland areas. Consequently, the ability of each soil type to adequately accommodate development varies considerably in Orono. Careful examination of each site is needed to determine the most appropriate land use for individual properties. Map 3A-3 references 7 different classes of soils. These classes are: Group A soils have a high infiltration rate and low runoff. These soils consist of deep, well drained sands or gravelly sands and have a high rate of water transmission. Group B soils have a moderate infiltration rate. This group consists chiefly of deep well drained soils with a moderately fine to moderately coarse texture and a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C soils have a slow infiltration rate. This group consists of soils with a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or fine textured soils and a slow rate of water transmission. Group D soils have a very slow infiltration rate and high runoff potential. This group is composed of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils with a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is placed in group D because of a high water table it may be assigned to a dual hydrologic group: A/D, B/D, or C/D. The first letter of the pair represents the soil’s group if drained and the D represents the natural condition. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 8 Orono's native vegetation is primarily woodland interspersed with localized areas of wet prairie marshlands. Northern Orono and many areas along Lake Minnetonka's shore contain vestiges of Minnesota's Big Woods with hardwood forests of oak, maple, elm, and basswood. Much of these have been thinned into scattered stands, as shown on Map 3A-4, but major forests remain in north central and north east Orono, especially around Lydiard Lake and in the MNDNR's Wolsfeld Woods and Wood Rill nature areas. In addition, 100 year old settlements have by now added mature stands of various evergreens and other decorative trees and shrubs. Tree Preservation Policy 1. The City finds that its trees and woodlands provide numerous benefits including: soil stabilization, reduction of storm water runoff, improvement of air quality, reduction of noise pollution, protection and increase of property values, privacy, energy conservation through natural insulation, and natural habitat for birds and other wildlife. 2. It is the City’s policy to preserve and protect significant trees, stands of trees and wooded buffer areas. 3. The City will study whether adoption of additional tree protection and replacement ordinances is necessary to accomplish these goals. 4. The eradication of exotic vegetation species such as buckthorn will be encouraged in all wooded areas. However, in Shoreland areas where complete removal of buckthorn may leave a relatively bare lakeshore, plans for revegetation may be required. Orono's Ground Water Supplies Orono enjoys the same abundant ground water resources from the Twin Cities artesian basin as does most of the metropolitan area. In addition, our generally heavy clay soil layers near the surface have protected the ground waters from surface pollution. Most areas of the City have had no difficulty obtaining potable water supplies drawn from the Jordan aquifer with wells ranging in depth from 75 to 200 feet. Only occasional wells have had to go deeper. Land Cover Summary. In 2006, Hennepin County published the Natural Resource Inventory for Orono which is included here by reference. The land cover classification encompassed the entire incorporated area of the City (approximately 15,400 acres) of which 1/3 is open water. Artificial surfaces, which include residential areas, farmsteads, commercial lands and other areas with greater than four percent impervious surfaces, accounted for an additional 20% of Orono’s total area. Forest and woodland cover combined accounted for an additional 20% of Orono, with herbaceous vegetation types (wet meadows, cattail marshes, etc.) and planted, maintained or cultivated vegetation types (agricultural crops, hayfields, pastures) each comprising 13% of the City. The figure 3A-1 below illustrates Orono’s MLCCS Level One Land Cover, as does Map 3A- 4. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 9 Natural Resource Inventory Results. The Inventory identified 358 individual natural community remnants, covering a total of 2,549 acres or approximately one-fourth of Orono’s land area. These included eight forest types, one woodland type, two shrub-land types, four herbaceous wetland types, and one upland grassland type. Each of the remnants was categorized with regards to quality as either high, good, moderate or low. Nearly half of this acreage (1,148.2 acres) is encompassed in Maple-Basswood Forest remnants ranging in size from 0.2 acres to 113.2 acres. Oak Forests comprise 369 acres, and Lowland Hardwood Forests total 157 acres. Other forest types identified include Aspen Forest (4.4 acres); Tamarack Swamps (25.4 acres); Floodplain Forests (14.5 acres); Black Ash Swamps (56.9 acres); and Mixed Hardwood Swamp (3.1 acres). Oak Woodland/Brush-land totals 38.0 acres. Shrub-lands identified in the inventory include Willow Swamp (30.4 acres) and Alder Swamp (2.8 acres). Herbaceous wetlands documented in the inventory include 568 acres of Cattail Marsh ranging from 0.1 acres to 106.1 acres in size; 11.9 acres of Wet Meadow; 2.5 acres of Poor Fen; and 74.2 acres of Mixed Emergent Marsh. Upland grasslands include Mesic Prairie totaling 29.3 acres. Aggregate Orono does not benefit from aggregate (Sand/ gravel) resources in a commercially viable scale. Consequently, there are no plans to open or allow for aggregate mining within the city of Orono. Figure 3A-1 Land cover CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 10 ORONO AS A “RURAL OASIS” In 2005, the City of Orono commissioned DSU, Inc. to quantify several goals intended to preserve the Cities Rural Oasis Identity. That study is retained as an appendix in the 2008-2030 CMP and is incorporated by reference here. The goals and guiding principles identified by that study are highlighted here: Goals Future development in Orono must achieve the following goals: Goal #1: Promote the conservation and enhancement of the quality of surface water and wetlands throughout the city, particularly Lake Minnetonka. Goal #2: Ensure the preservation and enhancement of the existing "rural character" of the city. Guiding Principles In order to guarantee that future development in Orono will achieve the above goals, these "Guiding Principles" for development shall be followed in the City of Orono: Guiding Principle #1: Promote ecologically sensitive stormwater management. Applying an ecologically-based stormwater management system will improve ecosystems by reducing both reliance on manmade infrastructure and reducing downstream runoff of contaminants. Guiding Principle #2: Establish and maintain native ecological communities. Conserving and improving natural and semi-natural areas will provide wildlife habitat and support natural ecological functions (i.e. drainage, filtering, buffering, etc). Guiding Principle #3: Establish and maintain ecological connections. Creating ecological connections will enhance stormwater collection and conveyance, promote ecological and wildlife corridors, and provide recreational opportunities for residents. Guiding Principle #4: Preserve and augment corridor enclosure. Maintaining and improving the extent of roadway corridor enclosures will promote community aesthetics associated with the city's rural character. Guiding Principle #5: Preserve views. Mitigating the visual impacts of development will also preserve the aesthetic elements of the landscape. Guiding Principle #6: Preserve and maintain landmarks and unique points of local character. Preserving distinct cultural features will maintain a familiar sense of place in the community. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 11 The city, in the review of this CMP, added a 7th guiding principal: Guiding Principle #7: Continue to work to educate property owners and residents on the effects development and use have on the environment and character of the community. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT Surface Water Management Plan Introduction The City of Orono’s 2018 Local Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) attached as Appendix 3A-A is an update of the 2011 SWMP. This Surface Water Management Plan has been developed to serve as a comprehensive planning document to guide the City of Orono in conserving, protecting, and managing its surface water resources. The SWMP provides an inventory of water resource related information including the results of assessments conducted by other governmental units, both local and state. From this inventory and assessment, Orono sets forth its goals and policies and implementation program. The SWMP also seeks consistency with the goals and policies of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and with the requirements and guidance provided in the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 Water Resources Management Policy Plan. Within this document additional information such as amendment procedures, subwatershed modeling, and other engineering details are included. Statutory Requirements This SWMP meets the requirements detailed in Minnesota Statutes 103B and Minnesota Rules 8410, administered by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. Minnesota Statute 103B.201 states that the purposes of the water management programs are to: 1. Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems; 2. Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems; 3. Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality; 4. Establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management; 5. Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems; 6. Promote groundwater recharge; 7. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; and CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 12 8. Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater. This plan is also consistent with the goals and policies of the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 Water Resources Management Policy Plan, and the goals, rules and management objectives of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) with whom Orono partners in its management activities. Though intended to serve Orono until 2028, this plan may be periodically amended to remain current with local practices and policies and to maintain Orono’s compliance with MCWD rules and State of Minnesota laws and rules. NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit Since 2003 Orono has operated its stormwater management program under a permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). This permit is called the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit and authorizes Orono to discharge stormwater to waters of the state under certain conditions. This permit is included by reference. Under its permit coverage, Orono has implemented a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to addresses the MS4 Permits six minimum control measures, as listed below: 1. Public education 2. Public involvement 3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination 4. Construction site runoff control 5. Post-construction runoff control 6. Pollution prevention in municipal operations The City’s SWPPP contains several Best Management Practices within each of the listed control measures. These were identified using a self-evaluation and input process with City staff. Many of the goals and policies discussed in the SWMP are directly related to requirements listed in the NPDES program. As a result, the implementation section of this plan references items listed in the City’s SWPPP. Goals, Policies and Strategies The City of Orono highly values the natural resources within its jurisdiction and seeks to protect surface and groundwater storage systems, effectively manage expenditures to correct flooding and water quality problems, prevent erosion into surface waters, promote groundwater recharge, enhance wildlife habitats and water recreational facilities, and improve the water quality of all water resources. Therefore, the city established the following goals. Specific policies and implementation strategies are listed in the SWMP. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 13 1. Maintain or improve the physical, chemical, biological, and aesthetic condition of surface water resources. 2. Develop and implement plans as necessary to reduce pollutant loads for waters that do not meet Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) as approved by the EPA. Coordinate City efforts with applicable Implementation Plans as approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 3. Minimize and mitigate the impacts of urban stormwater runoff on water resources. 4. Manage and protect wetlands to maximize wetland functions and improve surface water resources. 5. Manage Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems to ensure proper design, installation, operation, maintenance or replacement in order to eliminate health hazards or illicit discharges to water resources. Connect properties with SSTSs to city sanitary sewer as soon as feasible. 6. Manage and protect natural upland areas adjacent to surface water resources to mitigate degradation of surface waters and increase the quantity, quality and biological diversity of natural areas. 7. Protect the quality and quantity of groundwater resources. 8. Provide the public with the knowledge, skills, and motivation to protect and improve surface water and groundwater resources. Implementation Planning SWMP includes a plan for implementation water resource improvements. The plan identify potential projects in the following categories: 1. Stream and shoreline restoration projects. 2. Outlet control structure repair or replacement projects. 3. Localized storage, volume reduction, and water quality improvement sites. 4. Wetland restoration sites 5. Natural upland restoration sites. The projects included will be used for planning purposes and will require further development prior to inclusion in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The City of Orono partners with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District in the administration of Surface water management programs. This agreement is referenced in Section 3.21 in appendix 3A-A. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 14 FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT An element of surface water management addressed in the SWMP Goals is the management of flood plains and wetlands. The City of Orono originally adopted a Flood Plain Ordinance in 1970, which has since been revised and updated on a regular basis, most recently with Hennepin County’s mapping revision in November, 2016. The principles of flood plain regulation go hand-in-hand with those of stormwater management. The City will be best served by retention of open land uses which would locate permanent structures and artificial obstructions in a manner that would not obstruct the passage of waters nor destroy the natural public waters, marshes and wetlands within the City. The Ordinance is compliant with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program codified as 44 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 59--78, as amended, so as to maintain the community's eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. Orono’s defined flood plains are depicted on Map 3A-5. SHORELAND MANAGEMENT The City of Orono in 1992 adopted a comprehensive Shoreland Management Ordinance, pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103F, Minnesota Regulations Parts 6120.2500-6120.3900, and the planning and zoning enabling legislation in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. In 2012, this ordinance was amended to better promote the public health, safety and general welfare by providing for the wise subdivision, use and development of shorelands abutting public waters that exist within the City’s corporate boundaries. Orono’s defined Shoreland Overlay District is depicted on Map 3A-6. SOLAR ACCESS PROTECTION Minnesota Statutes 473.859 requires that local comprehensive plans include an element for the protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The City of Orono will protect such access by requiring minimum standards for lot sizes, amounts of open space, yard setbacks, and maximum height of buildings for urban and rural residents. Land uses should not preclude the possible use of solar energy systems. The Metropolitan Council has estimated the City’s solar potential as follows: Table 3A-4 Solar Potential Gross Potential Rooftop Potential Gross Generation Potential Rooftop Generation Potential (Mwh/yr) (Mwh/yr) (Mwh/yr)2 (Mwh/yr)2 14,656,623 442,509 1,465,662 44,251 Figure 3A-2 displays the City’s Solar Suitability Analysis. Protecting solar access means protecting solar CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 15 collectors (or the location of future collectors) from shading by adjacent structures or vegetation. Existing structures and buildings in the City generally do not present significant shading problems for solar energy systems and the City’s promise of open, rural spaces is intended to protect that condition. Most single family attached and detached homes are one or two stories and most multi-family, commercial, and industrial buildings are three stories or less. Solar energy systems and equipment are generally a permitted use if attached to structures. The zoning ordinance provides standards for the protection and establishment of these solar energy systems. While these ordinance standards help protect solar access, it is not possible for every part of a building or lot to obtain unobstructed solar access. Mature trees, topography, and the location of structures can limit solar access. However, on most properties the rooftop of the principal building would be free of shading by adjacent structures. Therefore, the majority of property owners in the City could utilize solar energy systems, if they so desired, as a supplement or alternative to conventional fuels. It is not desired by the City of Orono to expand solar collection at the expense of clearcutting and wholescale tree removal. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 16 Figure 3A-2 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 17 QUALITY OF LIFE PRESERVATION Orono’s primarily residential character has resulted in an environment that is relatively free from the noise pollution of major roadways, the light pollution of commercial and industrial development, and other negative impacts such as odors, vibration, toxic emissions, glare and visual clutter that are common in non-residential areas. The residents of Orono place a high value on the quality of life provided by the lack of such negative impacts. The City of Orono is committed to preserving the qualities that make Orono an attractive residential community while providing an adequate level of the necessary services, commerce and industries required to support the community. Preservation of Dark Skies A key element that adds to the quality of life in Orono is its dark night sky. The ability to view a naturally dark, star-filled sky is a precious resource as valuable as our forested landscapes and our fresh air and clean water. But this inspiring amenity can be easily lost in the presence of inappropriate and unnecessary outdoor lighting. While artificial lighting is necessary for safety and security, the quality of that lighting can have a profound effect on our night-time security and enjoyment. Night Sky Policies 1. The City finds that preservation of the night sky is an important factor in maintaining the quality of life in Orono, and that inappropriate and unnecessary outdoor lighting can lead to glare, light trespass, sky glow and other negative impacts inconsistent with dark skies. 2. Orono will encourage the use of efficient and properly designed outdoor lighting to limit the occurrence of these negative impacts while providing for the necessary levels of safety, security and visibility appropriate to the area being illuminated. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICIES The Goals and Policies of this Chapter are basic to the remaining sections of the Community Management Plan. Without environmental stability, Orono's character and vitality would be lost. With environmental care and concern, Orono citizens expect their forefather's heritage to live on for generations to come. Environmental Protection Goals 1. Preserve, conserve, and enhance the water quality of Lake Minnetonka and all other lakes in Orono. 2. Expand education of the benefits and value of environmental features in Orono. 3. Preserve, conserve, and enhance the City's marshland, wetland and natural drainage system. 4. Provide for surface water management such that the City is protected from both flooding hazards and pollution hazards. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 18 5. Protect the City's ground water resources from pollution and from depletion. 6. Protect the City from air, water and noise pollution. 7. Preserve, conserve, and enhance open space, light and air, including solar access for all properties. 8. Preserve a reasonable amount of native woodlands as an integral part of Orono's heritage. 9. Protect and preserve a reasonable amount of natural wildlife habitat in woodlands and wetlands. 10. Protect the land from soil erosion and the hazards of dust and siltation. 11. Preserve greenways and open space corridors. 12. Promote conservation and enhancement of the quality of surface water and wetlands throughout Orono, particularly Lake Minnetonka. 13. Ensure the preservation and enhancement of the existing "rural character" of the city. 14. Preserve Orono’s night skies and minimize light pollution. General Policies For Natural Resource Management 1. Orono will promote and support the formulation and implementation of environmental protection policies by other Lake Minnetonka area municipalities and responsible government agencies. 2. Environmental protection policies will continue to be utilized in the formation of all other goals and policies in this CMP. Orono's commitment to environmental quality is carried throughout each element in this comprehensive plan, coloring the goals, policies and implementation practices in every facet of municipal responsibility. 3. Development density will be limited to a level which will not overload the natural surface water drainage and filtration system. 4. Surface water runoff will be directed through the natural drainage system. Direct runoff into the lake will be avoided and will be prohibited whenever possible. 5. Natural drainageways will be favored over artificial storm sewers. Where storm sewers are needed, all efforts shall be taken to minimize their impacts on receiving waters. 6. The wetlands and marshlands of the city will be protected and preserved as wildlife habitats, as unique open spaces, and as the only economically practical method of flood protection and storm water runoff filtration. Orono’s recently updated wetland protection ordinances in concert with the additional regulatory authority of the MCWD, the MnDNR, MnBWSR and the Corps of Engineers will continue to provide an aggressive program to retain and enhance the viability of the City’s wetlands. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 19 7. Protection of the City's marshland, wetlands and drainageways shall include protection of adjoining lands and prevention of drainage, filling, dredging or wetland vegetation removal. 8. Protection of lake resources will allow reasonable access, use and enjoyment while preventing overcrowding and excessive encroachment. In conformance with MnDNR Shoreland Management regulations for Recreational Development lakes, the City will continue to prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. In conjunction with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will continue to be refined and enforced to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. 9. Lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. The establishment and preservation of vegetated buffers along lake shorelines will be promoted and encouraged. Clearcutting of the lakeshore will continue to be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, natural stone rip rap shoreline protection as well as bioengineering (plant-based) solutions for shoreline stabilization will be encouraged. The use of artificially constructed seawalls will be discouraged except where no other shoreline stabilization options are feasible. 10. Lake bed alterations will be discouraged because of adverse short-term and long-term effects on water quality. Dredging will be deemed appropriate in limited circumstances only where absolutely necessary to maintain existing natural riparian access permanently lost by something beyond the control of the landowner. Periodic low water conditions or the owner's desire for deeper draft watercraft are not sufficient reasons for disrupting sensitive lake beds. 11. Development or alteration of floodplains will be restricted. Most of the City's identified floodplains are located along the shoreline or within designated marshlands and will be protected by other provisions applicable to those areas. 12. Natural resource investigation will be required as part of all development proposals. This will include topographical information, soil analysis, drainage plans, vegetation plans, erosion control measures and similar site data related to each project, whether public or private. The extent of each such review will be determined by probable environmental impact. 13. On-site water retention facilities will be required as part of all residential, commercial or industrial development projects whenever necessary to maintain or improve the existing storm water runoff patterns as required by law and Ordinance. 14. Land use and development will not be permitted at the expense of environmental protection. 15. Erosion control plans and programs will be required in all land alteration projects. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 20 16. Erosion control Best Management Practices shall be applied to all land alteration projects. 17. Citizen efforts to protect and enhance the natural environment will be encouraged. The City will encourage individual citizens and private groups or organizations to be pro-active in the preservation of the environment in which they live. Activities such as reforestation, prairie and wetland restoration, buckthorn removal, minimizing use of phosphorus on lawns establishment of lakeshore buffer strips and rain gardens, lake and stream trash cleanup, and other citizen-driven efforts are an important element in Orono’s commitment to environmental protection. 18. Protection and preservation of greenways and open space corridors will be considered as part of the development process. The City will strive to provide connectivity between and among natural and semi- natural open spaces. Remnant natural areas will be preserved to the greatest extent possible, and will be connected where appropriate by greenways that may incorporate water resources and larger wetland systems, semi-natural communities, and restoration of degraded natural areas. 19. New development will be required to adhere to the methods of Conservation Design in order to achieve the City’s environmental protection goals. New development shall adhere to the six Guiding Principles established through the Orono Rural Oasis Study, including:  Promotion of ecologically sensitive stormwater management.  Establishment and maintenance of native ecological communities.  Establishment and maintenance of ecological connections.  Preservation and augmentation of corridor enclosures.  Preservation of views.  Preservation and maintenance of landmarks and unique points of local character. 20. Preservation of Orono’s dark night skies will be promoted by encouraging the use of appropriate outdoor lighting design. Urban Area Policies for Natural Resource Management 1. Land use standards will limit the impact of urban encroachment on Lake Minnetonka. Minimum lot widths will space out docks and structural encroachments while increasing areas of natural vegetation. The City will support the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in its ongoing efforts to limit the number of boats per property and the amount of public waters available for private docking and boat storage. 2. Retention of natural vegetation will limit the impact of urbanization as visible from the lake. Building heights will be limited to less than the typical tree height. Minimum green belts will be provided with prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be preserved on slopes. Retaining walls will be discouraged except when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened with natural vegetation. Changes to the topography of lakeshore lots with the intent of creating ‘walkout’ situations will be discouraged because such land alterations result in an unnatural lakeshore character. CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 21 3. Direct runoff into the lake will be minimized. Standards regarding the amount of impervious hardcover will continue to be aggressively enforced for residential properties within 1000 feet of the shoreline. The percentage of hardcover allowed within established lakeshore setback zones shall be limited in accordance with Orono’s hardcover ordinance which has been in effect in form since 1975. 4. All existing urban wetlands will be maintained and protected for surface water retention and filtration. 5. City maintenance practices will be designed to improve storm water quality, including salt use and snow storage policies. 6. A significant amount of natural woodlands and open space will be retained on each property. Retention of the natural environment requires careful siting and preservation of trees and open space on each urban property. 7. All developments will be designed to assure protection of light, air, and solar access for neighboring properties. Requirements for minimum lot size, amounts of open space, minimum yard setbacks, and maximum building heights will be designed to assure protection of these values for all urban residents. Rural Area Policies for Natural Resource Management 1. Land use standards will limit the pollution loading of rural marshes and drainageways. Rural densities will be low enough to ensure permanent reliance upon satisfactory on-site sewer and water systems where municipal sewer is not feasible and to ensure that rates of phosphorus and nitrogen generation will not adversely affect the water quality in the natural drainage system. 2. Rural land use densities will allow maximum retention of private woods and open space. Low rural densities will accommodate home-sites without affecting the traditional vistas of open fields and woods. The retention of these woodlands and marshlands will then assure permanent habitat for our abundant wildlife. 3. Rural wetlands and marshland will be maintained and protected for surface water retention and filtration. 4. The City will promote farming and animal management practices designed to conserve the soil and ground water and minimize pollution. 5. Land use standards will limit the impact of rural encroachment on Orono’s rural lakeshore areas. E lmCreek Lon gLake C r e e k Min n ehaha Creek MinnehahaCreekRi leyCreek PainterCreek Bass e ttCreek BluffC re ek Purgat oryCreek Lower Lake LakeMinnetonka Hennepin CountyCarver County MedicineLake Rice Lake CrystalBay-LakeMinnetonka LowerLakeMinnetonka MinnehahaCreek SixmileCreek Upper LakeMinnetonka Pioneer Creek Deephaven Eden Prairie Excelsior Greenwood Independence Long Lake MaplePlain MinnetonkaMinnetonkaBeachMinnetrista Mound Plymouth Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Wayzata Woodland Medina Chanhassen Chaska Victoria LaketownTwp. Orono Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_3A-1_LakeMinnetonka_85x11P.mxd | Date Saved: 10/30/2018 11:58:12 AM2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Lake Minnetonka November 2018 Legend !I 0 1.5MilesSource: MnGeo City Limits SurroundingCommunities County Boundary Lake Minnetonka Watershed Boundary Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams Map 3A-1 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_3A-2_Wetlands_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 10/30/2018 11:56:48 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN WetlandsNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Wetlands StormwaterPonds NationalWetlandsInventory Map 3A-2 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_3A-3_Soils_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 10/30/2018 11:56:10 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN SoilsNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Soils By Drainage Class Unclassified A A/D B B/D C C/D Map 3A-3 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_3A-4_MLCCS_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 10/30/2018 11:58:34 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Minnesota Land Cover ClassificationNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I MLCCS 11. 5-10%Impervious 12. 11-25%Impervious 13. 26-50%Impervious 14. 51-75%Impervious 15. 76-100%Impervious 21. ShortGrasses 22. AgriculturalLand 23. MaintainedTall Grass 24. TreePlantation 31. Forest 32. WetlandForest 51. Shrubland 52. WetlandShrubs 61. TallGrasses 62. WetlandEmergent Veg. 63. Dry TallGrasses 90. OpenWater 92. WetlandOpen Water Map 3A-4 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongL a k eCreekPainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrSugar woodDrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_3A-5_FEMAFloodplain_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 10/30/2018 11:55:46 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN FEMA FloodplainNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Flood Hazard Zones 100 YearFloodplain 500 YearFloodplain Floodway Map 3A-5 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongL a k eCreekPainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_3A-6_ShorelandOverlay_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 10/30/2018 11:57:52 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Shoreland Overlay DistrictNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Shoreland Overlay District DistrictBoundary LakeshoreSetback ProtectedTributaries IncludedFloodplain OverlayStreams Map 3A-6 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN CITY OF ORONO, MN November 29, 2018 Submitted by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318 P: 952-448-8838 City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan Surface Water Management Plan Orono, Minnesota I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By: Robert Bean, Jr., P.E. Registration No. 40410 Date: 11-29-2018 City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan BOLTON &MENK,INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS ORONO - SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Study Area ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Land Use Overview and Philosophy ................................................................................. 2 1.4 Land Use, Comprehensive Plan and Special Areas and Considerations .............................. 4 1.5 SWMP Structure .............................................................................................................. 6 2 Physical Environment ............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Climate ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Geology ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Topography and Soils ....................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Surface Water Resources .................................................................................................. 9 2.5 Impaired Waters ............................................................................................................. 10 2.6 Monitoring and Data Collection ...................................................................................... 11 2.7 Groundwater Resources .................................................................................................. 11 2.8 Ecological Resources ...................................................................................................... 12 2.9 Potential Pollutant Sources ............................................................................................. 14 3 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................ 15 3.1 State-Wide Regulation .................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Local Regulation ............................................................................................................ 16 3.3 City of Orono ................................................................................................................. 17 3.4 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) .............................................................. 18 3.5 Hennepin County............................................................................................................ 19 3.6 Three Rivers Park District............................................................................................... 19 3.7 Metropolitan Council ...................................................................................................... 19 3.8 State Board of Soil and Water Resources (BWSR) .......................................................... 20 3.9 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) ................................................................ 20 3.10 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) ....................................................... 20 3.11 Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) ........................................................................ 20 3.12 Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) ............................................................. 20 3.13 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) ........................................................ 21 3.14 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ................................................................ 21 3.15 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) ........................................................................ 21 3.16 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) ......................................................... 21 3.17 Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) ............................................................ 21 3.18 U.S. Geological Survey .................................................................................................. 21 3.19 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ........................................................................................ 21 3.20 Water Resource Agreements ........................................................................................... 21 4 Major Issues, Goals, and Policies.......................................................................... 23 4.1 Surface Water Management ............................................................................................ 23 City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan 4.2 Impaired Waters ............................................................................................................. 24 4.3 Urban Stormwater Management...................................................................................... 25 4.4 Wetland Management ..................................................................................................... 28 4.5 Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTSs) ............................................................. 29 4.6 Upland Natural Resources .............................................................................................. 29 4.7 Groundwater Management .............................................................................................. 30 4.8 Education ....................................................................................................................... 31 5 Water Resources Assessment and Implementation Plan ........................................ 32 5.1 General Assessment Procedures ...................................................................................... 32 5.2 Stream and Shoreline Restoration ................................................................................... 33 5.3 Outlet Control Structure Improvements ........................................................................... 33 5.4 Localized Stormwater Management Improvements ......................................................... 35 5.5 Wetland Restoration ....................................................................................................... 43 5.6 Natural Area Preservation and Restoration ...................................................................... 43 5.7 Education ....................................................................................................................... 45 5.8 Surface Water Management Costs and Funding Considerations ....................................... 46 6 Administration ..................................................................................................... 47 6.1 Review and Adoption Process ......................................................................................... 47 6.2 Collaboration with Other Entities .................................................................................... 47 6.3 Plan Amendments .......................................................................................................... 49 7 Appendices ........................................................................................................... 50 Appendix A: Figures Study Area ................................................................................................... Figure No. 1 Existing Land Use…… ................................................................................. Figure No. 2 Future Land Use ........................................................................................... Figure No. 3 Soils ............................................................................................................. Figure No. 4 Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) ............................... Figure No. 5 National Wetland Inventory and DNR Public Waters .................................... Figure No. 6 Impaired Waters ........................................................................................... Figure No. 7 Storm Sewer Map ......................................................................................... Figure No. 8 Appendix B: Subwatershed Maps: 10-yr and 100-yr Events Appendix C: Modeling Methodology Appendix D: Modeling Results Appendix E: Capital Improvement Plan City of Orono Page i Surface Water Management Plan CITY OF ORONO – SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Executive Summary This Surface Water Management Plan has been developed to serve as a comprehensive planning document to guide the City of Orono in conserving, protecting, and managing its surface water resources and comply with the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act, Minnesota Statue 103B.235, Minnesota Rule 8410, and the requirements of the local watershed management organizations. This document provides an inventory of water resource related information including the results of assessments conducted by other governmental units, both local and state. From this inventory and assessment, Orono sets forth its goals and policies and implementation program. The plan is organized as follows: 1.Section 1 offers an introduction to and purpose of the Plan, including a location map of Orono, an overview of Orono’s land use, and philosophy of ecologically based planning. 2.Section 2 of this Plan provides an inventory of land and water resources within the City including a description of the physical setting, available and pertinent water resources data, and important natural and conservation areas. 3.Section 3 includes a comprehensive documentation of the regulatory agencies influencing the management of surface water resources in Orono. 4.Section 4 outlines Orono's major issues, goals and policies, as well as implementation strategies, pertaining to water resources management. 5.Section 5 provides a current assessment of surface water management in Orono, including stormwater modeling and identification of corrective actions. 6.Section 6 outlines the continued administration of this plan with respect to plan updates and amendments, as well as annual reporting requirements to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 1 ORONO – SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 Introduction 1.1 PURPOSE This report provides the City of Orono with a Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) that will guide surface water and stormwater management activities conducted by the City over the next 10 years. This Plan meets the requirements detailed in Minnesota Statutes 103B and Minnesota Rules 8410, administered by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources.Minnesota Statute 103B.201 states that the purposes of the water management programs are to: 1. Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems; 2. Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems; 3. Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality; 4. Establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management; 5. Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems; 6. Promote groundwater recharge; 7. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; and 8. Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater. This plan is also consistent with the goals and policies of the Metropolitan Council and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). Though intended to serve Orono until 2028, this plan may be periodically amended to remain current with local practices and policies and to maintain Orono’s compliance with MCWD rules and State of Minnesota laws and rules. The Orono SWMP emphasizes a cooperative approach to surface water and stormwater management with all available partners. This approach assumes the public benefit is maximized when capital expenditures are closely coordinated between all interested parties. Listed below is the contact information for the City of Orono and MCWD: City of Orono –http://www.ci.orono.mn.us/ Adam Edwards, Public Works Director/City Engineer 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 –aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us Minnehaha Creek Watershed District –http://www.minnehahacreek.org 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 952-471-0590 1.2 STUDY AREA Orono lies in western Hennepin County and encompasses much of the northern shore of Lake Minnetonka. Lake Minnetonka is Orono’s central feature and the protection of Lake Minnetonka has guided the City’s land use planning decisions for decades.Figure 1 provides Orono’s location within the Metropolitan Area. Orono is bounded on the north by the City of Medina; on the east by Plymouth and Wayzata; on the south by Tonka Bay; and on the west by Spring Park, Mound, Minnetrista, and Independence. The City encompasses most of the southern quarter of Township 118N, Range 23W and the northern half of Township 117N, Range 23W, and lies entirely within the boundaries of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). MCWD spans a multitude of municipal boundaries; therefore, cooperation between communities within the watershed is necessary to effectively manage the watersheds’ resources. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 2 1.3 LAND USE OVERVIEW AND PHILOSOPHY Orono, located within the Central Hardwood Forest region of Minnesota, was originally covered with hardwood forest vegetation intermixed with prairie, lakes, streams and wetlands. The “Big Woods,” as this region is often called, consists primarily of maple, basswood, American elm, and oak trees. Between 1850 and 1880, the forests were extensively cleared for agricultural use. ORONO IS FORMED The City of Orono was created from parts of Medina and Excelsior townships and included a number of settlements which grew up along the railway lines such as Crystal Bay, Navarre, and Ferndale, as well as others that served the farming or summer home communities such as Tamarack (which later became the City of Long Lake) and Saga Hill. The open areas between these settlements developed in two distinct fashions: the shores of Lake Minnetonka in southern Orono became dotted with summer homes, and the areas away from the lake in central and northern Orono supported cash crop and dairy agriculture and truck farming. DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE A local/county road network was developed to serve these diverse communities, and U.S. Highway 12 provided a regional transportation link as it crossed northern Orono. To support agriculture, early development and road construction, county drainage systems were developed, including ditches that connected many of Orono’s large wetlands and marshes to the nearby creeks flowing to Lake Minnetonka. After WWII, full-year homes began to fill in much of the Lake’s shoreline, and a scattering of residential subdivisions developed in the more rural areas away from the Lake. As lakeshore development expanded, point source pollution from inadequate septic systems was recognized as not only a health risk but as a factor in the deteriorating water quality of the Lake. Municipal sewer lines were extended along Orono’s developed lakeshore starting in the 1960's. The city’s municipal sewage treatment plant was one of seven constructed to serve the cities within the Lake Minnetonka watershed. However, these plants were relatively inefficient in phosphorus removal, and each ultimately discharged back into the Lake. IMPACT ON ECOLOGY The ecology of the Lake makes it extremely susceptible to pollution. Due to its many bays (connected by restricted channels), a relatively small watershed area, and its primary source of hydrology being precipitation within the watershed, the Lake has an extremely long 25-year flush out period for a complete water change. Pollutants entering the lake remain for a long time and are not easily diluted. Lake Minnetonka has historically suffered from two problems that affect its environmental health and its value as a public amenity. The first is deterioration in water quality due to eutrophication, the natural aging process by which lakes are enriched with nutrients that stimulate excessive plant growth. This process has been artificially accelerated as a result of development in the Lake’s watershed. The second problem is hydrologic instability. With precipitation as the primary water source, water levels have fluctuated widely depending on rainfall. In more recent years, increasing urbanization of the watershed has resulted in increased amounts of stormwater runoff and, in turn, higher water levels that affect low-lying properties. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 3 THE PROBLEM WITH PHOSPHORUS Studies in the 1960s and 70s led to the conclusion that phosphorus is the key nutrient in the ecology of Lake Minnetonka. An overabundance of phosphorus results in excessive algae and weeds, reducing water clarity and making navigation more difficult. Taking steps to limit the amount of phosphorus reaching the Lake was identified as a key element in slowing its eutrophication. The discharge from the seven sewage treatment plants was identified as one of the two primary sources of phosphorus reaching the Lake. As a result, plans were developed and implemented in the late 1970s which redirected the treatment plant discharges, via interceptors, to a regional treatment plant on the Minnesota River near Shakopee. The other phosphorus source identified in the 1970's was stormwater runoff coming from within the watershed. To date this source has not effectively been controlled. At the time, various studies recommended that lakeshore density be limited, and the natural system of wetlands and marshes be forever protected and preserved as the only practical, economic method of filtering nutrients from runoff. It became clear that the problems of ever-increasing phosphorus inputs and stormwater volumes from an urbanizing watershed would become difficult and costly to solve, and should be avoided if possible. PLANNING FOR ECOLOGY The driving force behind Orono's planning has for many decades been the protection of Lake Minnetonka, perhaps the single most important surface water resource in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. One-third of the Lake's surface area and 40% of its shoreline are within Orono's corporate boundaries. Orono’s land and wetlands also comprise a significant portion of Lake Minnetonka's watershed. The studies in the early 1970s served to reinforce that future development will have significant impacts on the water quality of the Lake. Water quality in turn has a tremendous impact on the value of the lake as a regional and community resource. TAKING ACTION City leaders concluded that limiting the density and types of development within the City was necessary to preserve and protect the Lake. To this end, in 1975 city-wide rezoning, wetland, and floodplain ordinances were strengthened, and fully 80% of the City's land area was limited to residential lot sizes of no less than 2 acres. A 'hardcover' ordinance was also put into effect, limiting the percentage of impervious surface coverage for properties within 1,000 feet of the Lake. These regulatory changes closely followed recommendations from the 1974 Surface Water Management Plan. The result is a city that is primarily low-density residential in character. The majority of Orono designated as “Rural Area” is generally located in the northern and central portions of the city, and is zoned for single-family residences on lots of 2 to 5 acres. The remaining 20%, designated as the “Urban Area,” primarily includes homes on lots of ½ to 1 acre, with only 2% of the City devoted to commercial and industrial uses. The Urban Area includes the Navarre commercial area and the many lakeshore homes on smaller lots in southwestern Orono, as well as portions of the Highway 12 commercial/industrial area. Orono's 1980 Comprehensive Plan established policies that required property in the rural 2 and 5-acre zones to develop in a manner that did not require urban services. Metropolitan Council uses the Metropolitan Urban Service Area or MUSA to define those areas under its planning jurisdiction that will develop at urban density or, in unique cases, require sewer service at less than urban density. Refer to the City’s Comprehensive plan for more information regarding the MUSA. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 4 In addition to local regulations and policies, the EPA has established the Impaired Waters and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program as an important component of the Clean Water Act’s framework to restore and protect the nation’s waters.The program is comprised primarily of a two part process. First, states identify waters that are impaired or in danger of becoming impaired (threatened) and second, for these waters, states calculate and allocate pollutant reduction levels necessary to meet approved water quality standards. Several water bodies located partially or completely within the city boundary have been listed as impaired (see Figure 7), and Orono has been allocated pollutant reduction levels accordingly. The Impaired Waters and TMDL Program is discussed in more detail in subsequent chapters. 1.4 LAND USE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND SPECIAL AREAS AND CONSIDERATIONS Land use is an important factor in estimating surface water runoff, as the impervious surface associated with each land use greatly affects the amount of runoff generated.Figure 2 exhibits existing land uses in Orono and Figure 3 exhibits the projected land uses for the year 2040. It is presumed that continued development will be predominantly residential with some commercial/industrial expansion around Trunk Highway 12 and in the Navarre neighborhood. With these projections, priority areas have been identified for future water resource improvements or enhancements. Additional information regarding existing and planned land use in the area can be found in the City of Orono 2040 Comprehensive Plan. FLOODPLAIN, SHORELAND AND WETLANDS Urbanization leads to increased stormwater runoff as pervious soils are replaced by impervious pavement and roofs. When impervious area increases, runoff volume, runoff rate, and pollution also increase causing negative impacts to downstream water bodies. Stormwater management incorporates planning, designing, constructing, and maintaining facilities and providing services as part of a community-wide program in ways that avoid, minimize, and mitigate negative impacts from new construction and existing development to the maximum extent practicable. Rate control, volume control, water quality improvement, and conveyance are all elements of a constructed stormwater management system. Stormwater management is related to, but differs from, floodplain, shoreland, and wetland management programs. Floodplain management addresses federal, state, and local regulations associated with very large storm events. Floodplain regulations govern land alteration and restrict land use within areas specifically designated as flood prone. Shoreland management addresses state and local regulations associated with protecting the stability and habitats of lake and river shoreland while wetland management addresses federal, state, and local regulations that protect the hydrologic, biologic, and functional values of wetlands. Floodplain management occurs in Orono under the authority of City Code Chapter 78, Article VIII - Floodplain Management. The stipulations of this ordinance apply to officially designated floodplain as described in the most current Flood Insurance Study.Refer to the following link for more information regarding the FEMA 100-year floodplain areas around the City. https://msc.fema.gov/portal/advanceSearch# Shoreland management occurs in Orono under the authority of City Code Chapter 78, Article IX - Shoreland Management. Shoreland management classification for public water bodies are provided in Tables 1.2 and 1.3. Refer to the following link for the City Code: https://library.municode.com/mn/orono/codes/code_of_ordinances City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 5 Table 1.2: Public Waters Classification for Lakes OHWL (feet) Protected Waters Inventory I.D. # (1)Natural Environment (NE) lakes Lake Classen 974.5 162-P Dickey Lake 985.5 161-W French Lake (South Basin only)930.0 140-P Lydiard Lake 970.9 159-P Lake Katrina --154-P Wolsfeld Lake (Medina)--157-P (2)Recreational Development (RD) lakes Long Lake 944.3 160-P Mooney Lake 988.0 134-P Tanager Lake 929.4 141-P Hadley Lake (Plymouth)961.4 109-P (3)General Development (GD) lakes Forest Lake 929.4 139-P Lake Minnetonka 929.4 133-P Table 1.3: Public Waters Classification for Streams Tributary Name From To Sec.TWP R Sec.TWP R a. Long Lake Creek 35 (Basin 160P)118 23 10 (Basin 141P)117 23 b. Wolsfeld Creek 27 (City Limit)118 23 26 (Basin 160P)118 23 c.Tributary to Wolsfeld Creek from Holy Name Lake 26 (City Limit)118 23 27 118 23 d. Dickeys Lake Creek 27 (Basin 161P)118 23 34 (Basin 160P)118 23 e. Stubbs Bay Creek 32 (Basin 162P)118 23 5 (Basin 133P)117 23 f. Painters Creek 30 (Basin 154P)118 23 31 (City Limit)118 23 City Code Chapter 78, Article XI, - Wetlands Protection recognizes, preserves, and protects the unique environmental, aesthetic and hydrologic function of Orono’s wetlands by regulating the use of these wetlands. Orono’s wetland ordinance addresses the damaging effect of runoff rate and pollutant loading on wetland vegetation and wetland fauna. Through a wetland inventory based on wetland functions and values, Orono and MCWD have established functions and values based protection program that protects wetlands in proportion to their susceptibility to stormwater impacts with higher levels of protection provided for Orono’s most sensitive wetland resources. WATER QUALITY Orono's natural setting and proximity to the Twin Cities makes it a desirable location for both residential development and recreational activities. As the population of Lake Minnetonka's shoreland increased, and as recreational use grew, residents indicated a strong desire to maintain and improve the quality of Lake Minnetonka. It has been demonstrated that surface waters, as biological systems, can be negatively affected by increases in nutrients and toxic chemicals. Phosphorus is the nutrient most commonly managed because it is the limiting nutrient in the growth of algae and vegetation in lakes and wetlands. Soil erosion and sedimentation also play a significant role in poor water quality. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 6 In the 1950's increasing urbanization all around Lake Minnetonka threatened to environmentally "kill" the Lake by uncontrolled discharge of nutrients. Lake area municipalities began extending sewer systems to eliminate individual septic system discharges, but by 1968, lake water quality was still diminishing. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, together with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, commissioned a study of lake pollution. Completed in 1971, the "Harza Study" (A Program for Preserving the Quality of Lake Minnetonka) found that this nutrient input, particularly phosphorus, was being generated from two principal sources: the seven municipal sewage treatment plants within the watershed and urban stormwater runoff. The first major pollution source, nutrient-rich effluent from the sewage treatment plants, was systematically eliminated by multi-million dollar construction of regional sewer interceptors to remove effluent from the watershed. But stormwater runoff is a different matter. Compared to point-source sewage pollution, the collection and treatment of non-point source stormwater runoff is relatively difficult, costly, and often impractical. The development paradox is that if municipal services are extended into rural zones, the cost of these services taxes the land to the point that development is required. Particularly in the case of sewers, even if extended to existing pockets of development "to solve a pollution problem", inflation, topography and sparse settlement combine to send costs skyrocketing. Such costs can be paid only by increasing the level and density of new development, which in turn causes potential degradation of wetlands and increasing levels of stormwater nutrient pollution. This spiral effect results in statistically even greater levels of pollution than the original sewage "problem" might have generated. The cost of solving this problem, either filtering or rerouting the stormwater, has consistently been judged too expensive. Thus, the recommendation of many studies, as already incorporated in MPCA and MnDNR policy, is that lakeshore density be limited and that the natural system of wetlands and marshes be forever protected and preserved as the only practical, economic method of filtering nutrients from stormwater runoff. In response to the above concerns, Orono became a nationally recognized leader in the 1970’s by promoting environmental protection. Land use planning since the 1950's has stressed the environmental advantages of low density development. Long before the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) was passed, shorelands, wetlands and natural drainage systems were preserved in Orono by tradition and by ordinance. Orono's 2040 Land Use Plan will continue this tradition and commitment. 1.5 SWMP STRUCTURE The Orono Surface Water Management Plan is organized as follows: 1.Introduction: offers an introduction to and purpose of the Plan, including a location map of Orono, an overview of Orono’s land use and philosophy of ecologically based planning. 2.Physical Environment: provides an inventory of land and water resources within the City including a description of the physical setting, available and pertinent water resources data, and important natural and conservation areas. 3.Regulatory Setting: includes a comprehensive documentation of the regulatory agencies influencing the management of surface water resources in Orono. 4.Major Issues, Goals and Policies: lists the goals and policies identified to address surface water management needs in Orono. 5.Water Resources Assessment and Implementation Plan: provides an evaluation of current surface water management and stormwater resources within Orono. 6.Administration: outlines the continued administration of this plan with respect to updates and amendments, as well as annual reporting requirements to MCWD and the State. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 7 ORONO – SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 Physical Environment This section describes the physical setting within Orono and includes climate, precipitation, geology and soils information. The Minnesota statute that prompts Cities to prepare local surface water management plans requires a land and water resources inventory section. The information presented here is intended to augment information provided by the watersheds in their own plans. 2.1 CLIMATE Orono has a Humid Continental Climate, typified by considerable seasonal temperature differences, hot and humid summers, and cold to extremely cold winters, and is located in USDA Plant Hardiness Zone 4b. Native vegetation has a seven month growing season (April to October) and crops have a five month growing season (May to September). Two-thirds of the precipitation occurs during the crop growing season, with a total of almost 31 inches annually. Refer to Table 2-1 for a 30 year average of temperature and precipitation Data. Refer to Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 for estimated precipitation amounts for specific frequencies, durations, and locations at the link listed below. https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html?bkmrk=mn Table 2.1: 1981-2010 Monthly Climate Normals (MPLS Flying Cloud AP) Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Maximum Daily Temperature (°F) 23.6 29.1 40.6 57.4 69.7 78.7 83.1 80.6 71.5 58.5 41.3 27.1 55.2 Mean Daily Temperature (°F) 15.4 20.3 32.2 47.2 59.3 69.0 73.4 70.9 61.9 48.9 33.9 19.5 46.1 Minimum Daily Temperature (°F) 7.2 11.4 23.9 37.1 48.9 59.2 63.8 61.3 52.2 39.3 26.5 12.0 37.0 Average Precipitation (in.) 0.74 0.53 1.77 2.89 3.60 4.33 4.20 4.36 3.54 2.35 1.74 0.80 30.85 Source:National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2.2 GEOLOGY The geology of the region surrounding Orono is the result of two different geologic processes: ·Warm, shallow seas covered the area and created conditions for the formation of sedimentary rocks. These formations are present as bedrock in the area. ·Glacial processes have resulted in the development of surficial geology, and therefore, the current landforms. The geology of the City can be generalized characterized as over 100 feet of glacial till/drift overlying sedimentary bedrock. BEDROCK GEOLOGY The bedrock units present beneath the City are marine sedimentary rocks primarily of the Upper Cambrian to Middle Ordovician ages (450 to 500± million years old). Ranging from deeper/older bedrock to relatively shallow/younger bedrock, the geologic units present include the St. Lawrence/Franconia formation, Jordan Sandstone, the Prairie du Chien group, and St. Peter Sandstone. SURFACE GEOLOGY Glacial influence on this area began around 2.5 million years ago and continued until about 10,000 years ago. However, the landscape seen today was almost entirely influenced by activity between 30,000 and City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 8 16,000 years ago. The dominant geological feature in Orono is the remnant of the deteriorating Grantsburg sublobe of the Wisconsin glaciation, which covered the area until about 16,000 years ago. The landscape of Orono was formed by three glacial processes: ·the Lonsdale-Lerdal Till, which left mounds of glacial drift (small rocks up to boulders) that were “dropped out” of the glacier as it “stood still” for a period of time and then retreated ·the Emmons-Faribault Moraine formed hills where variably sized till was pushed to the edge of an advancing glacier ·irregularly shaped depressions, referred to as “kettles”, were formed by large blocks of ice and were filled as the ice melted After glaciation ended, the hills were “worn down” due to natural processes, resulting in the rolling landscape with filled depressions that became the many wetlands and water bodies seen in Orono today. Additional geological information can be found in the Geological Atlas of Hennepin County (Minnesota Geologic Survey, 1989). 2.3 TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS Most of Orono can be described as gently to steeply rolling with numerous depressions, many of which contain wetlands. Along the shorelines of Lake Minnetonka, the terrain includes steep slopes that sharply grade down to the shoreline, low lying areas just a few feet above lake level, or wetlands that extend away from the main body of water. Elevations generally decrease north to south, with a high elevation of about 1,060 feet above sea level in the northwestern part of the City to the surface elevation of Lake Minnetonka, 930 feet above sea level. There are three major soil associations in the City of Orono. The association in the eastern region of Orono is Lester/Peaty Muck. This association is defined as rolling and hilly medium textured and moderately fine textured soils that developed in glacial till. The western half of Orono consists of the Erin/ Kilkenny/Peaty Muck association; gently undulating to hilly, medium textured and moderately fine textured soils that developed in glacial till. Big Island in Lake Minnetonka (southeastern Orono) consists of the Hayden/Cordova/Peaty Muck association. This soil is nearly level to rolling, medium and moderately fine textured, developed in glacial till. The soils within the City of Orono have generally moderate infiltration rates and create a high to moderate susceptibility to groundwater contamination. The hydrologic soil classification map is shown in Figure 4. The four soil classifications are defined as follows: Group A – These soils have high infiltration rates even when thoroughly wetted. The infiltration rates range from 0.3 to 0.5 inches per hour. These soils consist chiefly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands and gravel. Group A soils have a high rate of water transmission, therefore resulting in a low runoff potential. Group B – These soils have moderate infiltration rates ranging from 0.15 to 0.30 inches per hour when thoroughly wetted. Group B soils consist of deep moderately well to well drained soils with moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. Group C – These soils have slow infiltration rates ranging from 0.05 to 0.15 inches per hour when thoroughly wetted. Group C have moderately fine to fine texture. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 9 Group D – These soils have very slow infiltration rates ranging from 0 to 0.05 inches per hour when thoroughly wetted. Group D soils are typically clay soils with high swelling potential, soils with high permanent water table, soils with a clay layer at or near the surface, or shallow soils over nearly impervious material. Dual Hydrologic Soil Types – These include A/D, B/D, and C/D. These soils behave like D soils when wet, and act like A, B, or C when dry. The predominance of Type B soils in upland areas indicates moderate infiltration capacity. However, the preponderance of Type D soils around wetlands and lakes indicates low infiltration capacity adjacent to many of the City’s water bodies. For planning purposes, infiltration rates listed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual should be referenced. For design purposes, actual infiltration testing of site soils should be performed to determine permeability rates. 2.4 SURFACE WATER RESOURCES LAKE MINNETONKA Surface water runoff from Orono drains to Minnehaha Creek’s upper watershed (the entire Lake Minnetonka drainage area) and flows through parts of three MCWD subwatersheds: 1.Stubbs Bay Creek 2.Painters Creek 3.Long Lake Creek Lake Minnetonka and its bays have a surface area of 22.6 square miles, and are listed as one of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Protected Waters. The lake drains an area of approximately 126 square miles, has a maximum depth of 101 feet, and has an outlet/surface elevation of approximately 930 feet. WATER COURSES There are six streams identified in Orono’s shoreland ordinance as protected waters within Orono. Five of these streams are identified on the protected waters inventory for Hennepin County: Long Lake Creek, “Wolsfeld” Creek, Tributary to “Wolsfeld” Creek, Stubbs Bay Creek and Painters Creek.Table 1.3 identifies these streams and their locations.Figure 6 provides mapping of DNR Public Waters. LAKES There are 12 lakes identified in Orono’s shoreland ordinance as protected waters within Orono.Table 1.2 identifies these lakes and their Public Classification, Ordinary High Water Level and Protected Waters Identification Number. These lakes are kettle lakes that were formed by large blocks of ice that became stationary while glacial deposits settled around them. As the ice melted, they filled the “kettles” they had formed. As a result of natural processes that have occurred since the end of glacial activity, mineral sediments and decomposing plant materials were deposited in these lakes and have created their current configuration. They vary in depth and shape, ranging from roundish to very irregular and from less than ten feet in depth to a deep spot of 88 feet in Browns Bay on Lake Minnetonka. WETLANDS As stated above, a large percentage of the wetland basins in Orono developed in the depressions created by glacial processes. Wetlands also occur in the nearly flat, sometimes extensive shoreline areas of Lake Minnetonka. These are also considered depressional wetlands. According to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District’s completed functional assessment of wetlands, the dominant wetland types within Orono are shallow emergent marshes. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 10 There is also shrub, forested, fresh meadow, and shallow open water wetlands scattered throughout the City. Generally, the USFWS Circular 39 classification of these wetlands includes Types 1 through 7. Figure 6 shows wetlands identified by the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) and those larger wetlands that fall under DNR jurisdiction. Additionally, MCWD performed a functional assessment of wetlands within the watershed greater than ¼ acre in size during 2001 – 2003. Wetlands were assigned one of four values, Preserve, or Manage 1, 2, or 3. These management classifications are used in regulating and protecting wetlands by the District. For legal purposes, wetland boundaries must be determined by on- site delineation, usually conducted when development occurs in lands adjacent to a wetland. MCWD’s Functional Assessment of Wetlands can be found at the following link: http://www.minnehahacreek.org/sites/minnehahacreek.org/files/attachments/Figure%2027%20FAW%20 by%20Classification.pdf 2.5 IMPAIRED WATERS The Federal Clean Water Act requires states to establish water quality standards, to test surface waters, and formally list those as "impaired" that do not meet the water quality standards. Subsequent sections presents more detail on the impaired waters program and its relationship to Orono's stormwater management program. A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study is the next step for an impaired water, although it can be delayed years after identification of the impairment. The TMDL study can result in very specific water quality obligations for Cities. Once the TMDL Study is accepted by the MPCA, an Implementation Plan must be developed, and MS4 Cities must develop an approach to meet the obligations identified in the TMDL Study. Currently, several water bodies located partially or entirely within the City boundary are listed as impaired, and three different TMDL Studies and Implementation Plans have been completed. The Minnesota State Mercury TMDL addresses impairment due to high levels of mercury. The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Chloride TMDL address impairment due to high levels of chlorides. The Upper Minnehaha Creek Watershed Nutrient and Bacteria TMDL address impairments due to high levels of nutrients and bacteria. Impaired waters in Orono, or those receiving discharge from Orono, are summarized in Table 2.3. Mapping of impaired waters is also depicted on Figure 7. Table 2.3: Impaired Waters** Waterbody/ Watercourse AUID#Listed Pollutant Impaired Use Year Listed Year TMDL Approved Existing Wasteload Allowable Wasteload Painter Creek 07010206- 700 E. Coli Aquatic Recreation 2010 2014 ** Forest Lake 27-0139-00 Nutrient/ Eutrophication Aquatic Recreation 2008 2014 118 lbs/yr 39 lbs/yr Long Lake 27-0160-00 Nutrient/ Eutrophication Aquatic Recreation 2010 2014 224 lbs/yr 100 lbs/yr Lake Minnetonka (Jennings Bay) 27-0133-15 Nutrient/ Eutrophication Aquatic Recreation 2008 2014 244 lbs/yr 92 lbs/yr Lake Minnetonka (Stubbs Bay) 27-0133-12 Nutrient/ Eutrophication Aquatic Recreation 2008 2014 269 lbs/yr 129 lbs/yr Lake Minnetonka (West Arm) 27-0133-14 Nutrient/ Eutrophication Aquatic Recreation 2008 2014 31 lbs/yr 3 lbs/yr City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 11 Waterbody/ Watercourse AUID#Listed Pollutant Impaired Use Year Listed Year TMDL Approved Existing Wasteload Allowable Wasteload Mooney Lake 27-0134-00 Nutrient/ Eutrophication Aquatic Recreation 2010 2014 1 lb/yr .04 lb/yr Tanager Lake 27-0141-00 Nutrient/ Eutrophication Aquatic Recreation 2010 2014 114 lbs/yr 55 lbs/yr Wolsfeld Lake 27-0157-00 Nutrient/ Eutrophication Aquatic Recreation 2010 2014 3 lb/yr 1 lb/yr *Refer to the Upper Minnehaha Creek Watershed Nutrient and Bacteria TMDL for allowable bacteria counts per various flow regimes. **Refer to the City’s SWPPP for information regarding Impaired Waters and TMDLs. 2.6 MONITORING AND DATA COLLECTION Orono does not monitor surface water resources nor is it equipped to do so. However, the City will continue to support monitoring of surface waters within the City. Data will be obtained through cooperation and coordination with other various agencies, including the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), adjacent cities, the Three Rivers Park District, the Metropolitan Council, and the Department of Natural Resources. MCWD conducts its own monitoring program, which includes surface waters within the City of Orono. The data is used to assess water bodies with the intent to identify capital improvement needs, evaluate previous capital improvements, provide calibration for its hydrologic, hydraulic, and pollutant loading model, and promote greater understanding of the overall health of the watershed. MCWD uses the Ecosystem Evaluation Assessment Program (E-Grade) to evaluate shallow and deep lakes, streams, wetlands, and uplands for biodiversity, habitat diversity, nutrient cycling, recreation, flood control, and groundwater quality to determine the overall health of the watershed. In addition to phosphorus and chlorophyll concentration and water clarity (data used previously to determine lake grades by the District), E-Grades will also include data on fish, aquatic insects, and wetland vegetation to evaluate resources. Monitoring data from the water bodies sampled by MCWD and E-Grades are available on their website at:www.minnehahacreek.org. Other water quality information can be found from the Three Rivers Park District, Metropolitan Council, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on the following websites: ·Three Rivers Park District:http://www.threeriversparks.org ·Metropolitan Council:http://www.metrocouncil.org ·Minnesota Pollution Control Agency:http://www.pca.state.mn.us 2.7 GROUNDWATER RESOURCES Water quality of surface waters can have great effect on groundwater due to the interaction via groundwater recharge and discharge. Orono relies strictly on groundwater (aquifers) for drinking water, and therefore, groundwater quality is equally as important as surface water quality. In the City of Orono, there are several sources of groundwater, or "aquifers". Of these, there are three significant aquifers from which groundwater are currently being used: 1.The quaternary (water table) aquifer, is found in glacial deposits, 2.The St. Peter aquifer, found in a layer of sandstone just below the glacial deposits, and 3.The Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer, found in adjoining dolomite-sandstone below the St. Peter formation. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 12 Most private wells, along with those of the City, draw water from the Prairie du Chien-Jordan complex. The St. Peter and quaternary aquifers are utilized primarily as domestic well sources. Well yields and water table elevations in the quaternary aquifer are dependent on local conditions. In this part of Hennepin County, groundwater flow in the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer is generally to the east/southeast. Groundwater elevations through Orono are about 900 feet (as compared to surface elevations of 930 to 1,060 feet). In the quaternary aquifer, groundwater flow is generally oriented from northeast to southwest to about the middle of Long Lake, and then generally north to south. This may vary locally due to the influence of surface water bodies, the effects of wells, and areas of high aquifer recharge. Elevations of groundwater range from about 970 feet in the northeast corner to 930 at the Lake Minnetonka shoreline. In addition to the known aquifers, areas of perched groundwater have been encountered. Perched groundwater occurs above deposits of low-permeability clay or silt. The clay or silt deposits are apparently not extensive. Perched groundwater often intersects the ground surface to create wetlands or ponds. WELLHEAD PROTECTION The Safe Drinking Water Act requires states to implement protection programs to prevent contamination of public drinking water sources. Therefore, the Minnesota Department of Health requires public water suppliers to delineate and manage Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPA) surrounding public water sources. Orono has an approved Wellhead Protection Plan and designated WHPA and Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) boundaries. Orono’s DWSMA has a very low to low vulnerability to contamination. However, the City should review potential developments within these areas to ensure incompatible industries or activities are not located where they will affect water quality of the existing wells. Incompatible activities may include infiltration Best Management Practices in close proximity. Additional information regarding groundwater resources can be found in the City’s Wellhead Protection and Water Supply Plans. Also, information regarding DNR permitting for each City well, its location, permitted volume, and number of gallons withdrawn each year can be downloaded from the DNRs website at www.dnr.state.mn.us. 2.8 ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES MLCCS AND MCBS The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System, or MLCCS, categorizes urban and built up areas in terms of land cover rather than land use. MLCCS serves as a tool for City staff to integrate land cover preservation into land planning, land use, and zoning decisions.Figure 5 provides MLCCS coverage for Orono. Natural land cover in Orono is dominated by planted and cultivated vegetation or herbaceous vegetation. Orono's planted and cultivated vegetation consists primarily of golf courses, large estate lawns and pasture, while herbaceous vegetation generally occurs in wetland and wetland fringe areas. The Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS) began in 1987 as a systematic survey of rare biological features on a county by county basis. The survey for Hennepin County is complete and the Hennepin County map is available on the DNR website. According to the County Biological Survey, a natural community is a certain assemblage of flora and fauna that have a unique set of characteristics. Examples are a "dry prairie", or in Orono, an area of "maple-basswood forest" (big woods). Areas that may not be dominated by a natural community can nonetheless be considered important areas. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 13 There may be individual occurrences of rare, threatened, or endangered species that can also be considered valuable resources yet are not identified by the survey. For Orono, the County Biological Survey map for Hennepin County lists the following important resources. 1.A small portion of maple-basswood forest and cattail marsh within Baker Park Reserve in the very northwest part of the City. 2.A maple-basswood forest referred to as Lowry Woods near the middle/western edge of the City. 3.Noerenberg Memorial Park and Garden along the northern and eastern shores of Crystal Bay and Maxwell Bay, respectively. 4.A small wet meadow and maple-basswood forest on Big Island. There are also two Element Occurrence records (EO) of state or federally listed animals, and one EO of a state or federally listed plant on Big Island. 5.An EO for a state or federally listed animal on the west shore of Carman Bay, and one on the boundary between Orono and Tonka Bay along Highway 19. 6.Two state or federally listed EOs at the channel between Crystal Bay and North Arm. 7.The Ferndale Marsh, owned by The Nature Conservancy at the eastern edge of the City, just south of Hwy 15. 8.Maple-basswood forest, wet meadow, mixed hardwood swamp, tamarack swamp, and three listed EOs in the Wood-Rill State Scientific and Natural Area (SNA) in the northeastern corner of the City. 9.Maple-basswood and lowland hardwood forests in the portion of the Wolsfeld Woods SNA in Orono along its middle/northern boundary. There may be other “remnant” natural communities, and EOs do not necessarily represent existing occurrences of plant or animal species. However, the DNR should be consulted prior to any construction activities at or near these locations. SCIENTIFIC AND NATURAL AREAS The Wolsfeld Woods and Wood-Rill Scientific and Natural Areas (SNA) are located in Orono. The MnDNR manages these and all other SNAs in Minnesota. Minnesota statute stipulates that any water within an SNA is an Outstanding Resource Value Water or ORVW. Specifically, Minnesota Rule 7050.0180 on Nondegradation for Outstanding Resource Value Waters prohibits discharge from the City’s stormwater system to Wolsfeld Woods and Wood-Rill. Additionally, Orono is not allowed any new or expanded discharges to these SNAs since the date they were established. Refer to the City’s Comprehensive Plan for more information on natural areas, open space, and regionally significant ecological areas. KEY CONSERVATION AREAS The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) has prepared a map identifying key conservation areas found throughout the District. The map identifies several areas within the City of Orono. These key conservation areas consist of wetland complexes and adjacent high priority uplands. The District's strategy in preserving these areas ranges from outright acquisition of high value resources to land owner assistance for enrolling property in conservation programs. Orono’s role is to assist MCWD in preserving these areas through municipal planning and zoning authority. The City will be able to use these mapped conservation areas, along with the MLCCS and MCBS data as a tool to integrate preservation of natural resources, including upland areas, into land planning, land use, and zoning decisions. The map of the Key Conservation Areas can be found on the districts website under their comprehensive water resource management plan at:http://www.minnehahacreek.org. Public Park and Open Space The City of Orono has a number of areas designated for park and open space within its corporate boundaries, owned and controlled by a variety of entities, including the City, Hennepin County, Three Rivers Park District, the State of Minnesota, and private owners. The typical uses at these facilities may City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 14 include recreation, walking, swimming, and passive uses. A number of these areas have been set aside in conservation easements or are designated to have minimal to limited development that will result in preservation of natural areas and provide both ecological and water quality benefits. In addition, dedication of fees to support park, recreation or conservation land acquisition are required for new development. Fees are outlined in the City’s Fee Schedule available on the City’s website. Refer to the City’s Comprehensive Plan for more information on parks. 2.9 POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES Potential environmental hazards within the City include known and potential sources of soil and groundwater contamination listed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and wells. Known and Potential Sources of Soil and Groundwater Contamination: The MPCA maintains a database of sites with known or potential soil and groundwater contamination, including Superfund candidate sites, contaminated soil treatment facilities, leak sites, petroleum brownfields, state assessment sites, and voluntary investigation and cleanup sites. The database contains sites that have already been investigated and cleaned up, sites currently enrolled in MPCA cleanup programs, and sites suspected of contamination but found to be clean after investigation. For the most current information, sources can be reviewed on the MPCA’s website at the following link: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/data/whats-my-neighborhood Wells: Wells are common place in Orono, and when properly installed, they pose no threat for potential contamination of groundwater. However, if improperly installed or abandoned, wells can provide a conduit for pollutants to enter groundwater. The DNR maintains an Index of known wells, some of which have been properly abandoned and sealed. However, those still in operation or abandoned but not properly sealed may allow for contamination of aquifers. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 15 CITY OF ORONO – SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 3 Regulatory Setting This section describes the City’s current stormwater management programs and practices and the agencies and organizations having roles in the City’s stormwater and surface water management activities. 3.1 STATE-WIDE REGULATION NPDES MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4)PERMIT Since 2003 Orono has operated its stormwater management program under a permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). This permit is called the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit and authorizes Orono to discharge stormwater to waters of the state under certain conditions. Under its permit coverage, Orono must implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to addresses the MS4 Permits six minimum control measures, as listed below: 1) Public education 4) Construction site runoff control 2) Public involvement 5) Post-construction runoff control 3) Illicit discharge detection and elimination 6) Pollution prevention in municipal operations The City’s SWPPP contains several Best Management Practices within each of the listed control measures. These were identified using a self-evaluation and input process with City staff. Many of the goals and policies discussed in this local surface water management plan are directly related to requirements listed in the NPDES program. As a result, the implementation section of this plan references items listed in the City’s SWPPP. Additional information regarding the City’s SWPPP can be found at the following location: http://www.ci.orono.mn.us/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={9F03E94A-D39F-4B40-BEFC- DDE3E263F6CF}&DE={BD839B37-D57F-4DF0-971B-7B79283E9450} IMPAIRED WATERS AND TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS The Federal Clean Water Act requires states to establish water quality standards, to test surface waters, and formally list those as "impaired" that do not meet the water quality standards. Subsequent sections presents more detail on the impaired waters program and its relationship to Orono's stormwater management program. A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study is the next step for an impaired water, although it can be delayed years after identification of the impairment. The TMDL study can result in very specific water quality obligations for Cities. Once the TMDL Study is accepted by the MPCA, an Implementation Plan must be developed, and MS4 Cities must develop an approach to meet the obligations identified in the TMDL Study. Currently, several water bodies located partially or entirely within the City boundary are listed as impaired, and three different TMDL Studies and Implementation Plans have been completed. The Minnesota State Mercury TMDL addresses impairment due to high levels of mercury. The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Chloride TMDL address impairment due to high levels of chlorides. The Upper Minnehaha Creek Watershed Nutrient and Bacteria TMDL address impairments due to high levels of nutrients and bacteria. Impaired waters in Orono, or those receiving discharge from Orono, are summarized in Table 2.3. Orono will reduce pollutant loading to address impairments outlined in TMDLs via their Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) inspection and enforcement program, by means of constructed stormwater management facilities, and through their street and storm sewer maintenance program. Additional City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 16 information regarding TMDL requirements and tracking can be found in the City’s SWPPP at the link provided above. OUTSTANDING RESOURCE VALUE WATERS Coverage under the MPCAs MS4 General Permit authorizes Orono to discharge stormwater into Minnesota’s waters through its Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). The permit does not allow new and expanded discharges to restricted waters as defined by Minnesota rules (7050.0180) unless prudent and feasible alternatives to the new and expanded discharge do not exist. The only rule- listed restricted waters that exist in Orono are the two Scientific and Natural Areas (SNA): Wolsfeld Woods and Wood Rill. NPDES CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY PERMIT In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, the MPCA issues a general NPDES permit to authorize the discharge of stormwater from construction activity. The Construction Activity Permit does not allow new or expanded discharges to Outstanding Resource Value Waters nor does it allow discharges to waters identified as impaired unless certain conditions are met. For projects that have a discharge point on the project that is within one mile of, and flows to, an impaired water, the permit requires additional water quality treatment and also requires that a portion of this treatment occur through infiltration. According to the permit, certain site conditions such as lack of separation to seasonally saturated groundwater, proximity to bedrock, poor soils, and contaminated soils can eliminate the infiltration requirement. The permit does not include language that eliminates the infiltration requirement for industrial sites and drinking water source protection areas, though the Minnesota Stormwater Manual (produced by the MPCA) supports exemptions in these two cases, as well, and the Minnesota Department of Health guidance for infiltration supports an approach that is protective of drinking water supplies. NPDES INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY STORMWATER PERMIT The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) issues a general NPDES permit that authorizes the discharge of stormwater for certain industrial activities. This permit covers a multitude of industrial facilities where the exposure of chemicals and other pollutants creates the potential for contaminated runoff to enter surface and groundwater resources. Much like the MS4 permit and the Construction Activity Permit, Industrial Stormwater Permit holders must develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, or SWPPP, that describes control measures to prevent pollutant discharges. As a means of avoiding the permit requirements, industrial facilities can certify a “No Exposure” condition, whereby all significant industrial materials and activities are protected from rain, snow, snow-melt and runoff through a storm resistant shelter. 3.2 LOCAL REGULATION Local regulation occurs through the cooperative efforts of Orono and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD).Table 3.1 describes the mechanisms by which this local regulation is applied. Table 3.1: Regulatory Mechanisms Official Control Responsibility Mechanism Erosion and Sediment Control City, MCWD ·NPDES MS4 Permit – Orono Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) ·NPDES Construction Permit ·NPDES Multi-Sector Permit ·Orono City Code: Chapter 79 – Construction Site Runoff Control. Building Permits incorporate Chapter 79 requirements. ·MCWD Erosion Control Rule City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 17 Shoreland City, MCWD ·Orono City Code: Chapter 78. Article IX – Shoreland Management ·MCWD Shoreline and Streambank Stabilization Rule Floodplain City, MCWD, DNR ·Orono City Code: Chapter 78. Article VIII – Floodplain Management ·MCWD Floodplain Alteration Rule Wetlands DNR, USACE, and Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) Members: BWSR & MCWD or HCD ·Orono City Code: Chapter 78. Article XI – Wetlands Protection ·MCWD Wetland Protection Rule ·Wetland Conservation Act – MCWD is LGU Illicit Discharge City ·Orono City Code: Chapter 14. Article III. Division 5. Subdivision 5 – Stormwater Illicit Discharge and Illicit Connection ·MS4 Permit – SWPPP Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program ·MCWD Illicit Discharge Rule Stormwater Runoff Management City, MCWD ·NPDES Construction Permit ·NPDES Multi-Sector Permit ·Orono City Code: Chapter 78. Article X. Division 6. Section 78-1579 – Drainage ·MCWD Stormwater Management Rule ·MCWD Waterbody Crossings and Structures Rule Groundwater City, MCWD, MDH ·Orono Wellhead Protection Plan ·MCWD Appropriations Rule Dredging MPCA, MCWD, DNR, USACE ·NPDES Construction Permit ·MPCA – Managing Dredge Materials and Managing Stormwater Sediments ·MCWD Dredging Rule Natural Area Preservation City ·Orono City Code: Chapter 78. Article XII – Conservation Design 3.3 CITY OF ORONO The City is in charge of all Orono’s public facilities, and the Public Works crew maintains city roads, parks, sanitary and storm sewers, and conducts periodic improvements to address water quality issues such as erosion repair and pond dredging. Refer to the City’s SWPPP for the storm drainage system mapping and inventory, illicit discharge and elimination program, enforcement response procedures, facilities operation and maintenance, pond assessments and management, inspections, and employee training. The Public Works Department, City Engineer, and City Planner coordinate with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and other outside agencies in water resource management and conservation. The Orono Planning Commission manages comprehensive planning. The City’s municipal code is available on the City’s website at http://www.ci.orono.mn.us. The City of Orono has several ordinances that regulate development, redevelopment, and aspects of surface water management. Chapter 79 provides Orono with a Construction Site Runoff Control Ordinance consistent with the NPDES Construction Activity Permit. This ordinance includes an enforcement process providing for right of entry, letter of warning, notice of violation, and emergency corrective action in an escalating series of steps leading to specific penalties. Penalties for noncompliance include stop work orders, withholding building inspections and certificates of occupancy, City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 18 revocation of permits, direct correction by the City, action against financial security, and ultimately misdemeanor charges leading to fines, imprisonment or both. The ordinance provisions pertain to projects that disturb one acre or more or involve excavation or grading of 25 cubic yards or more in non- shoreland areas and 10 cubic yards or more in shoreland areas. Orono’s Floodplain and Shoreland Ordinances, City Code Chapter 78, include provisions for the protection of these lands. Since 1975, Orono has regulated hardcover on properties within 1,000 feet of lakes through its shoreland ordinance. In 1992, hardcover regulations were added for properties within 300 feet of Painters, Long Lake, Wolsfeld, Stubbs Bay, and Dickey Lake creeks. Hardcover is any surface that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall into the ground. Limiting hardcover helps improve water quality and promotes aquifer recharge. The shoreland ordinance also stipulates setbacks and minimum lot sizes for properties within the defined shoreland overlay district. All this information is provided to project proposers through the City building permit application. Chapter 78 also provides for the protection of wetlands. However, since all wetlands within the City are within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and in an effort to avoid overlapping or conflicting regulations, the City defers jurisdiction for the regulation of wetlands to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. If application of MCWD regulations is in conflict with city regulations, the Watershed District requirements shall apply. For private storm sewer infrastructure, the City includes provisions within developer’s agreements for each project. These provisions include long term operation and maintenance requirements appropriate for the specific system. Orono constructs developer’s agreements that outline requirements for privately owned stormwater facilities. Provision for these private infrastructure maintenance agreements are part of the City’s SWPPP. MCWD is responsible for local administration of Construction Site Runoff Control, Permanent Stormwater Management, and the Wetland Conservation Act in Orono. For projects that do not meet MCWD thresholds for their rule requirements, Orono will review these projects with a philosophy of seeking phosphorus reduction through BMP implementation whenever such implementation is feasible and cost effective. At a minimum, any proposed improvements will be required to limit proposed peak stormwater runoff rates for the 2, 10, and 100 year, 24 hour events to existing peak rates for the same events and subject to the minimum criteria outlined in the NPDES MS4, Construction Activity, and Multi-Sector permits as applicable. 3.4 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT (MCWD) In 1955, the Minnesota State Legislature established the Watershed Act. This act provided the means to create watershed districts, special purpose units of local government with broad authority to regulate land use planning, flood control and conservation issues. In 1982, the legislature approved the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act, Chapter 103B of Minnesota Statutes. This act requires all metro-area local governments to address surface water management through participation in a Watershed Management Organization (WMO). A WMO can be organized as a watershed district, as a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) among municipalities, or as a function of county government. The City of Orono’s surface water flows to one watershed: the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). This agency has authority for review and approval of this Surface Water Management Plan. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 19 MCWD was formed in 1967 and covers portions of numerous cities and townships in Hennepin and Carver counties. These cities and townships include: Chanhassen, Deephaven, Excelsior, Golden Valley, Greenwood, Hopkins, Independence, Laketown Township, Long Lake, Orono, Medina, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound, Orono, Plymouth, Richfield, St. Bonifacius, St. Louis Park, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Watertown Township, Wayzata, and Victoria. MCWD covers the entire area in Orono. MCWD Water Management Plan (WMP). Through its Water Management Plan (WMP/Plan) the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD/District) has defined its role as a regional water planning agency and incorporates a subwatershed focus to address areas of significant resource needs with a level of complexity that requires sustained effort and coordination across multiple partners. Through sustained focus, the District is able to develop a thorough understanding of issues and drivers, build relationships, identify opportunities and coordinate plans and investments with its partners for maximum natural resource and community benefit. While operating on a subwatershed scale, focused within priority areas indicated in its WMP, the MCWD is remaining responsive to its communities District-wide by providing technical resources, regulatory coordination, and in some cases funding. MCWD partnership and level of response is driven by early coordination of land use planning through the implementation of the coordination plan. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District’s (MCWD) approach to water resource planning recognizes the environmental, social and economic value created when built and natural systems work in harmony. Through its WMP the MCWD emphasizes early coordination of land use and water resources planning with Cities to integrate water resources goals with other public and private goals to add this broader value and quality of life to the community. 3.5 HENNEPIN COUNTY Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services provides technical assistance to county residents, local government units, watershed organizations, and other agencies. They have assisted local governments with implementation of natural resource management plans, the Wetland Conservation Act, natural resource education, and application of sound natural resource practices. Their programs are funded through County allocation, grants, and contracts with local government units, contracts with watershed organizations, and state and federal cost share. 3.6 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT Three Rivers Park District is an independent, special park district established by the State Legislature in 1957. As a special park district, Three Rivers Park District is charged with the responsibilities of acquisition, development and maintenance of large park reserves, regional parks and regional trails for the benefit and use of the citizens of suburban Hennepin County, Scott County, the metropolitan areas, and the State of Minnesota. The Three Rivers Park District is also responsible for managing the Park District's water resources in cooperation with the surrounding communities and watershed management organizations in a way that is environmentally-responsible and that will maintain lake water quality at or above the levels experienced in 1989. Park District land within the City of Orono includes the Lake Independence and Dakota Rail Regional Trails, Noerenberg Memorial Gardens, Baker Park Reserve, and Big Island. 3.7 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Established by the Minnesota Legislature in 1967, the Metropolitan Council is the regional planning organization for the Twin Cities, seven-county area. The Council manages public transit, housing programs, wastewater collection and treatment, regional parks, and regional water resources. Council members are appointed by the Minnesota Governor. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 20 The Metropolitan Council reviews municipal comprehensive plans, including this Surface Water Management Plan. The Council adopted the Water Resources Management Policy Plan in 2015, establishing the expectations to be met in local plans. The Council’s goals focus on water quality standards and pollution control, “to reduce the effects of non-point source pollution on the region’s wetlands, lakes, streams and rivers.” 3.8 STATE BOARD OF SOIL AND WATER RESOURCES (BWSR) The BWSR works through local government agencies to implement Minnesota’s water and soil conservation policies. The BWSR is the administrative agency for soil and water conservation districts, watershed districts, watershed management organizations, and county water managers. The BWSR is responsible for implementation of the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act and the Wetland Conservation Act. Staff members are located in eight field offices throughout the state. First established in 1937 as the State Soil Conservation Committee, the agency became part of the University of Minnesota in the 1950’s, transferred to the Department of Natural Resources in 1971, and then transferred to the Department of Agriculture in 1982. In 1987, the State Legislature established the current Board of Water and Soil Resources. The Board consists of 17 members, appointed by the governor to four-year terms. Multiple state and local agencies are represented on the Board. In 1992, the BWSR adopted rules (8410), establishing the required content for Surface Water Management Plans. 3.9 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) The MPCA is the state’s lead environmental protection agency. Created by the State Legislature in 1967, the MPCA is responsible for monitoring environmental quality and enforcing environmental regulations to protect the land, air and water. The MPCA regulates Orono’s management of wastewater, stormwater, and solid waste. The MPCA is the permitting authority in Minnesota for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. 3.10 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) Originally created in 1931 as the Department of Conservation, the DNR has regulatory authority over the natural resources of the state. DNR divisions specialize in waters, forestry, fish and wildlife, parks and recreation, land and minerals, and related services. The Division of Waters administers programs in lake management, shoreland management, dam safety, floodplain management, wild and scenic rivers, the Public Waters Inventory (PWI), and permitting of development activity within public waters. 3.11 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (MDH) The MDH manages programs to protect the public health, including implementation of the Safe Drinking Water Act. The MDH has regulatory authority for monitoring water supply facilities such as water wells, surface water intakes, water treatment, and water distribution systems. The MDH also is responsible for the development and implementation of the wellhead protection program. 3.12 MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD (EQB) The EQB is comprised of five citizen members and the heads of ten state agencies that play an important role in Minnesota’s environment and development. The EQB develops policy, creates long-range plans and reviews proposed projects that may significantly influence Minnesota’s environment. 3.13 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) Within the City, MnDOT administers state highway systems. MnDOT approval is required for any construction activity within state right-of-ways. MnDOT also administers a substantial amount of City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 21 funding for transportation projects completed in the City. Anticipated activities of MnDOT are periodically published in their State Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP). 3.14 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) The EPA develops and enforces the regulations that implement environmental laws enacted by Congress; however, the MPCA bears responsibility for implementing many of the resulting programs within Minnesota. The NPDES program, the Impaired Waters List, and the Nondegradation Review are all the result of the Clean Water Act, administered by the EPA. 3.15 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE) Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, including subsequent modifications, the EPA and the USACE regulate the placement of fill into all wetlands of the U.S. In 1993, there was a modification of the definition of "discharge of dredged material” to include incidental discharges associated with excavation. This modification meant that any excavation done within a wetland required the applicant to go through Section 404 permitting procedures. In 1998, however, this decision was modified so that excavation in wetlands is now regulated by the USACE only when it is associated with a fill action. 3.16 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) FEMA manages federal disaster mitigation and relief programs, including the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). This program includes floodplain management and flood hazard mapping. FEMA published the initial Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for Orono in 2004. The Flood Insurance Study was updated in 2016. 3.17 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) is a division of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Formerly named the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), the NRCS provides technical advice and engineering design services to local conservation districts across the nation. The Soil Survey of Hennepin County Minnesota was published by the Soil Conservation Service in 1974. The SCS also developed hydrologic calculation methods that are widely used in water resources design. 3.18 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The USGS provides mapping and scientific study of the nation’s landscape and natural resources. USGS maps provide the basis for many local resource management efforts. 3.19 U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE The USFWS works to conserve and protect the nation’s fish, wildlife, plants and habitat. The USFWS developed the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) beginning in 1974, to support federal, state and local wetland management work. 3.20 WATER RESOURCE AGREEMENTS Below is a summary of formal agreements and “standard operating procedures” currently in place: ·With the Cities of Wayzata and Plymouth o North Ferndale ·With the Cities of Medina and Long Lake and with MCWD o Long Lake Creek Watershed Partnership ·With MCWD o Conditional Use Permit for CR6 detention pond o Weir on Painters Creek o WCA Representative City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 22 o Big Island Nature Park Management Plan ·Private Roads o Agreements are required to define drainage associated with private roads to be managed and maintained by the owners; if maintenance falls short, the City performs the work and then charges the owners involved. ·Subdivisions o Since 2010, most drainage easements have been written with some level of maintenance obligation in place. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 23 CITY OF ORONO – SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 4 MAJOR ISSUES, GOALS, AND POLICIES The City of Orono highly values the natural resources within its jurisdiction and seeks to protect surface and groundwater storage systems, effectively manage expenditures to correct flooding and water quality problems, prevent erosion into surface waters, promote groundwater recharge, enhance wildlife habitats and water recreational facilities, and improve the water quality of all water resources. Therefore, the following issues requiring action have been described, and each issue is followed by the City’s goal, specific policies, and implementation strategies. 4.1 Surface Water Management Issues 4.1I Poor management of surface water resources can lead to flooding and low water quality. Goal 4.1G Maintain or improve the physical, chemical, biological, and aesthetic condition of surface water resources. Policies 4.1.1P Continue to administer and maintain the Shoreland Management ordinance in accordance with state regulations. 4.1.2P Continue to administer and maintain the Floodplain Management ordinance in accordance with state regulations. 4.1.3P Evaluate and correct flooding issues on City property as necessary to protect public safety and minimize potential for property damage. 4.1.4P Provide support to landowners in evaluating and correcting localized flooding issues. 4.1.5P Prioritize restoration of eroded areas on natural streams, creeks, wetlands, and lakes on City property. 4.1.6P Promote water quality improvement, runoff volume reduction, and additional storage through wetland and stream restoration, natural area preservation, ponding, infiltration, filtration, impervious surface management, reuse, and other localized stormwater treatment. 4.1.7P Evaluate outlet control structures under City authority for performance and work with landowners, MCWD, and/or the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) to replace or repair the structures if needed. 4.1.8P Promote education regarding the benefits of proper surface water resources management. Implementation Strategies 4.1.1S The City will continue to administer the Shoreland Management ordinance in accordance with state and county requirements. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 24 4.1.2S The City will continue to administer the Floodplain Management ordinance in accordance with state and county requirements. 4.1.3S The City will continue to monitor and evaluate flooding issues on City property as necessary to protect public safety and minimize potential for property damage. Flood improvement projects identified will be prioritized based on available funds, feasibility, potential project partners, and benefits provided. Once projects are identified, this plan will be updated to list projects in Section 5.0 4.1.4S The City will provide assistance to landowners in evaluating localized flooding issues. If potential flooding will damage nearby dwellings or cause significant erosion and sedimentation, the City will partner with the landowner to correct drainage as feasible. The City’s contribution will be in the form of engineering recommendations. If a public benefit for the improvement exists, the City will consider cost participation. Approval of cost participation improvements will be by City Council. 4.1.5S Stream and shoreline restoration sites on City property will be identified and prioritized. Restorations will consider available funds, feasibility, possible project partners, benefits provided, bioengineered solutions, and TMDL Implementation Plans. Once restoration areas are identified, this plan will be updated to list the sites in Section 5.0. 4.1.6S In order to provide water quality improvement, runoff volume reduction, and additional storage, wetland and stream restoration, natural area preservation, ponding, infiltration, filtration, impervious surface management, reuse, and other localized stormwater treatment sites will be identified and prioritized. Sites will consider available funds, feasibility, possible project partners, benefits provided, bioengineered solutions, and TMDL Implementation Plans. Once sites are identified, this plan will be updated to list the sites in Section 5.0. 4.1.7S Outlet control structures under City authority will be evaluated for condition and performance and prioritized for repair or replacement. Evaluations will consider design outflows and design outlet elevations as well as available funds, feasibility, possible project partners, benefits provided, bioengineered solutions, and TMDL Implementation Plans. Once sites are identified, this plan will be updated to list the structures in Section 5.0. Structures under the authority of the City will be maintained regularly by City staff and repaired or replaced when performance is evaluated as unacceptable. For structures not under the authority of the City, the City will work with MCWD and MnDNR with the following activities: resolve conflicts between riparian landowners and/or the public, assist with modeling to determine appropriate outflow rate and outlet elevations, assist with structure design and construction, and provide support with maintenance. 4.1.8S Goals, policies and implementation strategies for Surface Water Management will be incorporated into the education programs identified in the City’s SWPPP. 4.2 Impaired Waters Issues 4.2I Currently, several water bodies located partially or entirely within the City boundary are listed as impaired. Impaired waters in Orono, or those receiving discharge from City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 25 Orono, are summarized in Table 2.3. Mapping of impaired waters is also depicted on Figure 7 Goal 4.2G Develop and implement practices as necessary to reduce pollutant loads for waters that do not meet Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) as approved by the EPA. Coordinate City efforts with applicable Implementation Plans as approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Policies 4.2.1P Reduce pollutant loading to Impaired Waters in order to restore water quality to State standards. 4.2.2P Promote education regarding the benefits of pollutant load reduction. Implementation Strategies 4.2.1S The City adopts the completed TMDLs and Implementation Plans into this plan by reference and as listed below. This plan will also be updated to incorporate any TMDLs approved in the future. -Minnesota State Mercury TMDL and Implementation Plan -Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Chloride TMDL and Implementation Plan -Upper Minnehaha Creek Watershed Nutrient and Bacteria TMDL and Implementation Plan Refer to individual TMDLs for more detailed information regarding allocations and required reductions. Management of Waste Load Allocations assigned in TMDLs will be provided through the City’s SWPPP in accordance with MS4 Permit requirements. 4.2.2S Goals, policies and implementation strategies for Impaired Waters will be incorporated into the education programs identified in the City’s SWPPP. 4.3 Urban Stormwater Management Issues 4.3I Land development substantially increases the rate and volume of surface water runoff due to the increase in impervious surfaces. Unmanaged runoff increases sedimentation, pollution, erosion, and flooding downstream and decreases groundwater recharge. Goal 4.3G Minimize and mitigate the impacts of urban stormwater runoff on water resources. Policies 4.3.1P Continue to administer and maintain the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements as they apply to the City of Orono. 4.3.2P Apply regulatory standards that help the City meet its goal for Urban Stormwater Management. 4.3.3P Prioritize potential stormwater management projects that will decrease local runoff rates and volumes and improve water quality. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 26 4.3.4P Maintain the storm drainage system using the practices described in this plan. Public Works Department would be responsible for maintaining system. 4.3.5P Maintain roads using the practices described in this plan. Public Works Department would be responsible for maintaining roads. 4.3.6P Maintain City’s database for stormwater related data, such as location and type. 4.3.7P Promote education regarding the benefits of proper urban stormwater management. Implementation Strategies 4.3.1S Any project within the City boundary that requires a NPDES CSW permit must provide a copy of the permit to the City prior to any work. Any facility required to obtain a Multi-Sector permit will be required by the City to do so in accordance with MPCA requirements. The City will continue to maintain its MS4 permit in accordance with State requirements. In addition, a maintained copy of this plan is the first step in being prepared for potential future NPDES requirements. 4.3.2S Rely on the water resource management standards set forth by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), and provide the necessary resources for the implementation of those standards and this Surface Water Management Plan. Employ staff or a consultant to perform the following tasks: A.Review Planning and Zoning Applications with regards to Water Resource Management Standards. B.Inspect BMP installations. C.Enforce BMP maintenance. The City will continue to rely on MCWD to maintain authority for reviewing and approving applications for compliance with MCWD’s rules and enforcing those rules as necessary. The City will also review all applications to ensure it is not adversely impacted by proposed improvements (i.e. infiltration over sanitary sewer, potential conflicts with future projects), and at a minimum, any proposed improvements will be required to limit proposed peak stormwater runoff rates for the 2, 10, and 100 year, 24 hour events to existing peak rates for the same events and subject to the minimum criteria outlined in the NPDES MS4, Construction Activity, and Multi-Sector permits as applicable. 4.3.3S Potential stormwater projects that decrease local runoff rates and volumes and increase water quality should be identified and prioritized. Sites should consider available funds, feasibility, possible project partners, benefits provided, bioengineered solutions, and TMDL Implementation Plans. Once projects are identified, this plan should be updated as needed to list the improvement sites in Section 5.0. 4.3.4S Maintain the storm drainage system with inclusion of the following items: A.Administer inspection program to ensure general maintenance is performed. Stormwater treatment devices should be inspected regularly, as required by the MS4 Permit. B.Maintain energy dissipaters and volume controls to prevent erosion. C.Administer pond inspection program to ensure adequate stormwater management is provided, as required by the MS4 Permit. Ponds should be cleaned when sediment has reduced the volume below the outlet to half of the design volume. D.Properly dispose of accumulated sediment collected from BMPs and any waste City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 27 generated during maintenance in accordance with state and federal regulations. 4.3.5S Maintain roads with inclusion of the following items: A.Administer inspection program and schedule to ensure general maintenance is performed. B.Maintain retaining walls and pavements to minimize cracks and leakage and prevent failure. C.Properly dispose of accumulated sediment collected from BMPs and any waste generated during maintenance in accordance with state and federal regulations. D.Use techniques such as suspended tarps, vacuums, or booms to prevent paint, solvents, and scrapings from becoming pollutants during bridge maintenance. E.Administer infrastructure safety inspection program. F.Keep drainage ditches free of debris. G.Cover salt storage piles and locate them outside the 100 year floodplain. H.Regulate the application of deicing salts to prevent over-salting of pavements. Consider using trucks with salt spreading calibration devices. I.Use alternative deicing materials, such as sand or salt substitutes. J.Prevent dumping of accumulated snow onto frozen surface waters. K.Establish vegetation on eroded or damaged areas in a timely manner. L.Restrict pesticide and fertilizer use as much as possible. M.Promote native plantings within buffer strips and ditches. N.Administer Street Sweeping program to maximize pollutant removal efficiency. O.Collect and remove road debris in a timely manner. 4.3.6S Employ staff or a consultant to maintain the City’s database of the entire storm drainage system. The database will include all facilities associated with stormwater runoff drainage, including catchbasins, storm sewer, wet stormwater ponds, bioretention basins, infiltration/filtration basins, hydrodynamic separators, sump manholes, outlet structures, and any other device used to convey runoff. The database will also include the specific characteristics for all the facilities, including locations, sizes, materials, elevations, areas, volumes, condition, and any other information deemed necessary. The database will be updated annually to include newly constructed or replaced facilities. In order to maintain this database and evaluate the condition of the City’s drainage system, the City will inspect 20% of these devices on an annual basis. This database can then be used for Implementation Strategy 4.3.3 to identify and prioritize stormwater projects. 4.3.7S Goals, policies and implementation strategies for Urban Stormwater Management will be incorporated into the education programs identified in the City’s SWPPP. The education programs will promote the following practices to the public to help reduce impacts to water resources: A.Maintain a healthy lawn. B.Plant native plants or plants with deep roots to capture more runoff. C.Preserve and maintain native vegetation areas, especially adjacent to streams and wetlands. D.Redirect downspouts to drain on pervious surfaces (grass) instead of impervious surfaces (driveways). E.Install rain gardens to capture localized runoff. F.Restore and/or stabilize shorelines. G.Capture rainwater from rooftops with a rain barrel or cistern and use for irrigation. H.Use a compost bin for leaves, lawn clippings, and other organic waste. I.Test soils for nutrients in order to apply the correct amount of fertilizer. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 28 J.Use zero phosphorus fertilizers. K.Keep leaves and lawn clippings out of streets and gutters. L.Pick up pet wastes. M.Limit the use of herbicides and pesticides. N.Wash cars on pervious surfaces to prevent soaps from running off-site. O.Do not dispose any household product into the storm sewer. P.Keep neighborhoods free from litter and debris. 4.4 Wetland Management Issues 4.4I Draining, filling, or excavating wetlands significantly impacts the water quality of downstream surface waters. The loss of existing wetlands leads to increases in sedimentation, pollution, erosion, and flooding downstream and decreases the diversity and integrity of vegetation and wildlife. Goal 4.4G Manage and protect wetlands to maximize wetland functions and improve surface water resources. Policies 4.4.1P Achieve no net loss in the quantity, quality, and diversity of existing wetlands through enforcement of Wetland Management regulations. 4.4.2P Promote wetland restoration, as a way to mitigate historical impacts to wetlands and increase the quantity and quality of wetlands locally. 4.4.3P Promote education regarding the benefits of proper wetland management. Implementation Strategies 4.4.1S The City will rely on the water resource management standards set forth by MCWD and their management of the Wetland Conservation Act in Orono. Also, the City will continue to administer City Code as it relates to wetland management and provide the necessary resources for the implementation of those standards and this Surface Water Management Plan. Staff or a consultant will be employed to perform the following tasks: A. Review and approve site improvement plans. B. Coordinate review and approval of wetland delineations, exemptions, and replacement plans with MCWD. C. Coordinate and attend TEP meetings for pre-application reviews and other WCA related items. D. Coordinate enforcement of replacement wetland monitoring requirements, review of monitoring reports, and certification of replacement wetlands with MCWD. E. Work with DNR and SWCD as necessary to identify and enforce WCA violations. 4.4.2S Potential wetland restoration projects that mitigate historical impacts and increase the quantity and quality of local wetlands will be identified and prioritized. Sites will consider available funds, feasibility, possible project partners, benefits provided, bioengineered solutions, and TMDL Implementation Plans. For planning purposes, MCWD’s Functional Assessment of Wetlands will be used to help prioritize restoration areas. Once projects are identified, this plan will be updated as necessary to list the restoration sites in Section 5.0. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 29 4.4.3S Goals, policies and implementation strategies for Wetland Management will be incorporated into the education programs identified in the City’s SWPPP. 4.5 Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTSs) Issues 4.5I Failing or improperly maintained Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTSs), more commonly referred to as septic systems, have significant potential to contaminate surface and groundwater resources with nitrates, phosphorus, harmful bacteria, viruses, and other toxic substances. Goal 4.5G Manage SSTSs to ensure proper design, installation, operation, maintenance or replacement in order to eliminate health hazards or illicit discharges to water resources. Connect properties with SSTSs to city sanitary sewer as soon as feasible. Policies 4.5.1P All SSTSs shall obtain a permit as required by City ordinance and shall be operated and managed according to City ordinance and current best management practices. 4.5.2P Promote education regarding the benefits of proper SSTS operation and management. Implementation Strategies 4.5.1S The City will continue the administration and enforcement of its City code and SSTS permitting requirements. 4.5.2S Goals, policies and implementation strategies for SSTSs will be incorporated into the education programs identified in the City’s SWPPP. 4.6 Upland Natural Resources Issues 4.6I Loss of natural upland areas can lead to a decrease in the function and quality of surface water resources. Goal 4.6G Manage and protect natural upland areas adjacent to surface water resources to mitigate degradation of surface waters and increase the quantity, quality and biological diversity of natural areas. Policies 4.6.1P Increase the quantity and quality of existing natural areas through enforcement of existing regulations and the participation of willing landowners in existing preservation and restoration programs. 4.6.2P Promote the restoration of natural upland areas, as a way to mitigate the degradation and fragmentation of natural resources and improve water quality of surface water resources. 4.6.3P Promote education regarding the benefits of proper natural upland management. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 30 Public understanding and involvement is essential in maintaining and restoring natural upland areas. Implementation Strategies 4.6.1S Employ staff or a consultant to administer City code (i.e. Shoreland Management, Conservation Design, etc.), the SWPPP as required by the MS4 Permit, and the strategies outlined in this Plan. Also, engage interested land owners in conservation and preservation of natural areas as opportunities arise. 4.6.2S Potential natural upland restoration projects that mitigate the degradation and fragmentation of natural resources and improve water quality of surface water resources will be identified and prioritized. Sites will consider available funds, feasibility, possible project partners, benefits provided, bioengineered solutions, and TMDL Implementation Plans. Once projects are identified, this plan will be updated annually to list the restoration sites in Section 5.0. 4.6.3S Goals, policies and implementation strategies for managing natural uplands will be incorporated into the education programs identified in the City’s SWPPP. 4.7 Groundwater Management Issues 4.7I Groundwater quality and availability can be significantly impacted by many different land use activities. Goal 4.7G Protect the quality and quantity of groundwater resources. Policies 4.7.1P Protect groundwater quality and groundwater supplies. 4.7.2P Promote groundwater recharge, if soil conditions allow. 4.7.3P Promote education regarding the benefits of proper groundwater management. Implementation Strategies 4.7.1S The City will provide support or assistance to the following activities: A. Work with landowners to identify and seal potential contaminate sources, such as unused, unsealed wells and failing storage tanks. B. Administer the strategies outlined in the City’s Wellhead Protection Plan. C. Support the MPCA in regulating storage tanks. D. Implement water conservation efforts, as necessary. 4.7.2S The City will provide LID recommendations to developers during the planning phase via comment and review letters and promote incorporation of LID techniques and BMPs into site designs. 4.7.3S Goals, policies and implementation strategies for managing natural uplands will be incorporated into the education programs identified in the City’s SWPPP. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 31 4.8 Education Issues 4.8I Most potential contamination threats, sources of pollution, and increases in stormwater runoff to water resources are related to human activities. Goal 4.8G Provide the public with the knowledge, skills, and motivation to protect and improve surface water and groundwater resources. Policies 4.8P Increase public awareness, understanding, and involvement in water and natural resource issues and management. Implementation Strategies 4.8.1S The City will provide support and assistance to MCWD with the District’s educational programs in the form of information sharing and help with promotion materials. The City will identify target audiences and educational needs and collaborate with MCWD to create educational opportunities to meet these needs (workshops, seminars, K-12 programs, etc.), create education tools (website, newsletter, pamphlets, fairs, etc.), and support volunteer programs. The City will meet annually with MCWD’s Education Coordinator to discuss goals and strategies each year and create short, specific annual education plans. Goals, policies and implementation strategies for education will be incorporated into the programs identified in the City’s SWPPP. 4.8.2S The City will provide MCWD with the following information and update MCWD as changes occur; -City staff contact information and information on media/methods of communicating with the public. This includes city newsletter times and distribution numbers, city fairs and expos, and any other outreach methods to the public. -Information on major issues of concern (e.g. flooding, erosion, etc.). -Provide information on topic areas where the city would like to increase citizen awareness (e.g. stormwater ponds, wetlands, water conservation) City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 32 CITY OF ORONO – SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 5 WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 5.1 General Assessment Procedures The general procedure and scope of this SWMP includes the development of a planning document to identify 1) stream and shoreline restoration sites, 2) outlet control structure repair or replacement sites, 3) localized storage, volume reduction, and water quality improvement sites, 4) wetland restoration sites, and 5) natural upland restoration sites. The sites listed here should be used for planning purposes and are intended to highlight any potential large-scale issues. The following summarizes the major activities associated with plan development: 1. The existing City utility and storm sewer mapping was researched to determine existing drainage patterns and locations of catch basins, culverts, storm sewer, outlet structures, treatment basins, and other pertinent drainage features. Additionally, existing storm water models from recent developments and the District were analyzed. 2. Lidar topographic mapping was obtained and correlated with the existing storm drainage data to determine and model the existing drainage patterns. However, the elevation contours provided with lidar mapping is only approximate and should not be considered adequate for final design of storm drainage systems. A definite margin for error in the determination of the watershed limits exists and the parameters used in estimating stormwater flows would need to be revised with more detailed localized topographic information for specific improvements. 3. Key areas of concern were identified for field inspection using topographic mapping and storm sewer data. Field inspections and surveys were then performed to identify culvert sizes and invert elevations of critical culverts in the drainage system, as well as road top elevations. 4. Each minor drainage area flowing to a collection point was identified and mapped on a master drainage area drawing. Eighteen subwatershed collection areas were identified as part of this project. 5. Drainage area maps were plotted and used to review existing drainage patterns and determine reasonable alternatives for future storm drainage improvements. Many factors were considered in this planning/design process including, flooding potential, potential water quality benefits, operation and maintenance, and cost. Surface runoff and storm drainage design is primarily dependent upon the permeability of existing surfaces, travel time and rainfall intensity. The SCS Runoff Curve Number Method, as developed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS), was used to estimate runoff. Curve Numbers were computed for each subwatershed to reasonably reflect the degree of existing industrial, commercial and residential development. The subwatershed delineations and node identifications are shown on the Subwatershed Maps provided in Appendix B. Based on the subwatershed and routing analysis, a potential future stormwater management system was developed. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 33 To estimate peak runoff rates, runoff volumes, and inundation, Sanitary and Storm Analysis (SSA) by Autodesk was used to create a watershed model capable of simulating various storm events and their impact on the City’s drainage system. The flow and inundation estimates provided by the model assisted in locating and sizing potential localized stormwater management and treatment sites. (additional information on modeling methodology is provided in Appendix C). Estimated costs were only determined for capital improvements with a High prioritization level. Improvements with a Low or Medium prioritization level are not to be implemented within the next five years, so estimated costs will not be determined for these until they are closer to implementation. As projects are completed and priorities are re-evaluated, this plan will be updated to provide estimated costs for remaining improvements listed. 5.2 Stream and Shoreline Restoration 5.2.1 Existing Streams, Creeks, and Rivers There are six streams identified in Orono’s shoreland ordinance as protected waters in Orono. Five of these streams are identified on the protected waters inventory for Hennepin County: Long Lake Creek, “Wolsfeld” Creek, Tributary to “Wolsfeld” Creek, Stubbs Bay Creek and Painters Creek.Table 1.3 identifies these streams and their locations. 5.2.2 Existing Lakes and Wetlands There are 12 lakes identified in Orono’s shoreland ordinance as protected waters in and around Orono.Table 1.2 identifies these lakes and their Public Classification, Ordinary High Water Level and Protected Waters Identification Number. 5.2.2 Proposed Stream and Shoreline Restoration Sites Restoration projects will be coordinated with and TMDL reduction managed through the City’s SWPPP. The following are restoration sites identified to help manage stormwater runoff and improve water quality. S-1. Long Lake Creek Shoreline Stabilization Collaborate with MCWD to identify and implement strategies to restore, preserve and/or stabilize the shoreline of Long Lake Creek. This project would help meet the goal of improving the physical, chemical, biological, and aesthetic condition of surface water resources, as well as improve the quality of runoff to Lake Minnetonka and Minnehaha Creek. Prioritization:Medium Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD, Private Landowners Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant Funding Timeframe: Unknown Should any additional stream restorations sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. 5.3 Outlet Control Structures Improvements 5.3.1 Proposed Outlet Control Structure Improvement Projects City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 34 Improvement projects will be coordinated with and TMDL reduction managed through the City’s SWPPP. The following are outlet control structure improvement projects identified to help manage stormwater runoff and improve water quality. O-1. Casco Point Park Outlet Casco Point Park is located in the Carman Bay (CB) Subwatershed. Runoff draining to Casco Point Park currently discharges through a 6” clay tile line that is located on the south side of the park and drains south to Lake Minnetonka. The tile is undersized for the drainage area and in poor condition. The stormwater drainage model predicts that even during smaller rain events, flooding occurs in the park with runoff overtopping the road, which agrees with local observation. In order to limit flooding potential and adequately convey runoff, an outlet control structure should be installed in the park and a new 12” pipe should be installed to Lake Minnetonka. In addition, water quality, volume reduction, and/or storage capacity improvements should be considered in this location to provide runoff rate and pollutant reduction, promote groundwater recharge, and meet TMDL goals. As such, this project should be coordinated with Section 5.4. Prioritization:High Estimated Cost: $58,066.25 Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD Timeframe: Unknown O-2. Casco Cove Outlet Runoff draining down Casco Point Road in the neighborhood of 2900 Casco Point Road drains east to a low area in the backyards between Casco Point Road, Casco Avenue, and Casco Cove. Runoff then discharges through a 12” RCP across Casco Cove to Lake Minnetonka without any treatment. The area around the backyard depression is located in tree canopy and somewhat denuded of vegetation. The outlet is undersized for the drainage area and in poor condition. The stormwater drainage model predicts that even during smaller rain events, flooding occurs in the backyards with runoff overtopping the road, which agrees with local observation. In order to limit flooding potential and adequately convey runoff, an outlet control structure should be installed in the backyards, and a new 12” pipe should be installed to Lake Minnetonka. In addition, water quality, volume reduction, and/or storage capacity improvements should be considered in this location to provide runoff rate and pollutant reduction, promote groundwater recharge, and meet TMDL goals. As such, this project should be coordinated with Section 5.4. Prioritization:High Estimated Cost: $79,145.00 Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Private Landowners Timeframe: Unknown O-3. McCulley Road Outlet Runoff from the east side of McCulley Road, from approximately Bayside Road to Watertown Road, currently drains to a submerged 24” pipe crossing just north of the Luce Line Trail crossing. Due to the submerged design and beaver activity, maintenance is difficult and flooding of the adjacent trail frequently occurs. In order to limit flooding potential and adequately convey runoff, an outlet control structure should be installed on the east side of McCulley Road. In addition, storm sewer improvements should be considered in this location to help limit flooding potential and City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 35 maintenance due to beaver activities. As such, this project should be coordinated with Section 5.4. Prioritization: Medium Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD Timeframe: Unknown Should any additional outlet control structure improvement projects be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed projects. 5.4 Localized Stormwater Management Improvements 5.4.1 Existing Stormwater Management System The areas of Orono consisting of newer developments typically contain storm sewer in good condition, stormwater treatment ponds, and filtration/bioretention basins. The older areas of town typically do not contain any treatment ponds or filtration/ bioretention basins. However, the storm sewer in the areas without treatment measures does effectively convey runoff. Because of this, these areas are not a priority for the City to reconstruct. As funding becomes available and potential stormwater management improvements align with other necessary street and utility improvements, the City will consider installing retrofit stormwater treatment measures as feasible. 5.4.2 Proposed Localized Stormwater Management Improvement Projects The City will continue to maintain the existing storm drainage system and evaluate flooding issues on City property as necessary to protect public safety and minimize potential for property damage. Additionally, the City will be available to work with MCWD and private landowners to investigate potential localized stormwater management improvement sites. Improvement projects will be coordinated with and TMDL reduction managed through the City’s SWPPP. The following are localized stormwater treatment improvement projects identified to help manage stormwater runoff and improve water quality. G-1. General Storm System Maintenance The existing storm drainage system is performing adequately to convey runoff, although, system maintenance will be required annually. Storm drainage system maintenance required includes pond assessment and cleaning, street sweeping, sewer televising, and GIS/mapping. Prioritization:High Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD, Private Landowners Funding Source(s): City, MCWD Timeframe: Unknown G-2. Annual Street and Utility Improvement Projects As street, sanitary sewer, and water main improvement projects are scheduled annually, project areas will also be reviewed for potential stormwater management and treatment improvements that were not previously identified. Potential improvements include, but are not limited to, conveyance improvements, stormwater treatment devices, bioretention basins, wet retention ponds, slope stabilizations, and native vegetation City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 36 restoration. Prioritization:High Estimated Cost: $160,000/yr Project Partner(s): MCWD, Private Landowners Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant Funding Timeframe: Unknown G-3. Stormwater Runoff Management and Treatment Measures Correct flooding issues on City property as necessary to protect public safety and minimize potential for property damage. Also, as opportunities become available, install stormwater treatment measures (i.e. rain gardens, stormwater treatment devices, etc.) throughout the City to provide additional runoff storage capacity, reduce runoff rates and volumes, and/or reduce pollutant loads. The City will evaluate public properties and collaborate as necessary with MCWD and willing private landowners for viable locations not on City land to install measures. Measures will be coordinated to treat stormwater discharge from areas with inadequate or no treatment and improve the quality of runoff reaching area surface waters. Prioritization:Low Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD, Private Landowners Funding Source(s): Stormwater Utility Fee, MCWD, Grant Funding Timeframe: Unknown Browns Bay (BB) Subwatershed Improvements BB-1. Hanlon Avenue Runoff draining to the low area north of Dickonson Street currently outlets through storm sewer along Hanlon Avenue to a wetland on the north side of Shoreline Drive, then through a submerged 30” pipe under the road to the wetland on the south side, then through 2 – 18” culverts under Ferndale Road, and finally a 12” culvert through the old road bed of Shoreline Drive to Browns Bay. In addition, no treatment is provided prior to any wetland outfalls. Due to lack of conveyance capacity and volume control, flooding is observed during larger rain events along Hanlon Avenue (and in the wetland adjacent to 1185 Ferndale Road). In order to provide water quality improvement and limit flood potential, rain gardens, sump manholes with flow baffles, new inlets, and storm sewer improvements should be considered for this area. The retrofit rain gardens and sump manholes would provide stormwater runoff treatment from a previously untreated area of Orono, improving the quality of runoff reaching Lake Minnetonka, and ultimately Minnehaha Creek. In addition, flooding potential would be minimized due to increased conveyance capacity and decreased runoff volume. Prioritization:Low Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD Timeframe: Unknown Carman Bay (CB) Subwatershed Improvements CB-1. Casco Point Park Casco Point Park is located at the south end of Casco Point Road. Runoff draining to Casco Point Park currently discharges through a 6” clay tile line that is located on the City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 37 south side of the park and drains south to Lake Minnetonka without any treatment. The tile is undersized for the drainage area and in poor condition. The stormwater drainage model predicts that even during smaller rain events, flooding occurs in the park with runoff overtopping the road, which agrees with local observation. In order to provide water quality, volume reduction, and storage capacity improvement, a bioretention basin should be considered for this location. The retrofit basin would treat stormwater runoff from a previously untreated area of Orono, improving the quality of runoff reaching Lake Minnetonka, and ultimately Minnehaha Creek. In addition, flooding potential would be minimized due to increased storage capacity and volume reduction. Outlet control structure improvements should be considered in this location, as well, to provide adequate runoff rate control and limit flooding potential. As such, this project should be coordinated with Section 5.3. Prioritization:High Estimated Cost: $54,945.00 Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown CB-2. South Casco Point Road Runoff draining down the street in the neighborhood of 3040 Casco Point Road currently drains through a number of inlets to a 12” CMP to Lake Minnetonka without any treatment. Due to the lack of inlet and conveyance capacity, flooding is observed during larger rain events. In order to provide water quality improvement and limit flood potential, a sump manhole with flow baffle, new inlets, and storm sewer improvements should be considered for this location. The retrofit sump manhole would provide stormwater runoff treatment from a previously untreated area of Orono, improving the quality of runoff reaching Lake Minnetonka, and ultimately Minnehaha Creek. In addition, flooding potential would be minimized due to increased conveyance capacity. Prioritization: High Estimated Cost: $35,653.75 Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown CB-3. Casco Cove Runoff draining down Casco Point Road in the neighborhood of 2900 Casco Point Road drains east to a low area in the backyards between Casco Point Road, Casco Avenue, and Casco Cove. Runoff then discharges through a 12” RCP across Casco Cove to Lake Minnetonka without any treatment. The area around the backyard depression is located in tree canopy and somewhat denuded of vegetation. The outlet is undersized for the drainage area and in poor condition. The stormwater drainage model predicts that even during smaller rain events, flooding occurs in the backyards with runoff overtopping the road, which agrees with local observation. In order to provide water quality, volume reduction, and storage capacity improvement, a bioretention basin and storm sewer improvements should be considered for this location. The retrofit basin would treat stormwater runoff from a previously untreated area of Orono, improving the quality of runoff reaching Lake Minnetonka, and ultimately Minnehaha Creek. In addition, flooding potential would be minimized due to improved conveyance infrastructure, increased storage capacity, and volume reduction. Outlet control structure improvements should be considered in this location, as well, to provide adequate runoff rate control and limit flooding potential. As such, this project should City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 38 be coordinated with Section 5.3. Prioritization:High Estimated Cost: $56,320.00 Project Partner(s): MCWD, Private Landowners Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown CB-4. Caroline Avenue Runoff draining down the street in the neighborhood of 2691 Caroline Avenue currently drains through a couple of inlets to a 12” pipe to Lake Minnetonka without any treatment. Due to the lack of inlet and conveyance capacity, flooding is observed during larger rain events. In order to provide water quality improvement and limit flood potential, a sump manhole with flow baffle, new inlets, and storm sewer improvements should be considered for this location. The retrofit sump manhole would provide stormwater runoff treatment from a previously untreated area of Orono, improving the quality of runoff reaching Lake Minnetonka, and ultimately Minnehaha Creek. In addition, flooding potential would be minimized due to increased conveyance capacity. Prioritization:Medium Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown CB-5. Carman Street Runoff draining down the street in the neighborhood of 2440 Carman Street currently drains through three inlets to a 12” pipe to Lake Minnetonka without any treatment. Due to the lack of inlet and conveyance capacity, flooding is observed during larger rain events. In order to provide water quality improvement and limit flood potential, a sump manhole with flow baffle, new inlets, and storm sewer improvements should be considered for this location. The retrofit sump manhole would provide stormwater runoff treatment from a previously untreated area of Orono, improving the quality of runoff reaching Lake Minnetonka, and ultimately Minnehaha Creek. In addition, flooding potential would be minimized due to increased conveyance capacity. Prioritization:Medium Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown Crystal Bay (CY) Subwatershed Improvements Currently, no localized stormwater management improvement projects have been identified for the Crystal Bay (CY) subwatershed. Should any improvement sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. Forest Lake (FL) Subwatershed Improvements Currently, no localized stormwater management improvement projects have been identified for the Forest Lake (FL) subwatershed. Should any improvement sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 39 French Lake (FL) Subwatershed Improvements Currently, no localized stormwater management improvement projects have been identified for the French Lake (FR) subwatershed. Should any improvement sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. Hadley Lake (HA) Subwatershed Improvements HA-1. Chevy Chase Drive Runoff draining along the north loop of Chevy Chase Drive flows to a low area at 132 Chevy Chase Drive, then through a 12” RCP across the road without any treatment, ultimately flowing to Hadley Lake in Plymouth, MN. Due to lack of conveyance capacity along Chevy Chase Drive, surface flooding is observed in several yards during larger rain events. In order to provide water quality, volume reduction, and storage capacity improvement, rain gardens and storm sewer improvements should be considered for this area. Retrofit rain gardens would treat stormwater runoff from a previously untreated area of Orono, improving the quality of runoff reaching Hadley Lake, and ultimately Minnehaha Creek. In addition, flooding potential would be minimized due to improved conveyance infrastructure, increased storage capacity, and volume reduction. Prioritization:High Estimated Cost: $69,148.75 Project Partner(s): MCWD, Private Landowners Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown HA-2. Ferndale Green Runoff from Ferndale Green drains along the edge of the pavement to an inlet in the low area in the northwest corner of the intersection with North Ferndale Road without any treatment, then through the storm system on Ferndale Road, and ultimately to Hadley Lake in Plymouth, MN. Due to increased precipitation and lack of conveyance, surface flooding is observed on the road during even smaller rain events. In order to provide water quality, volume reduction, and storage capacity improvement, rain gardens and storm sewer improvements should be considered for this area. Retrofit rain gardens would treat stormwater runoff from a previously untreated area of Orono, improving the quality of runoff reaching Hadley Lake, and ultimately Minnehaha Creek. In addition, flooding potential would be minimized due to improved conveyance infrastructure, increased storage capacity, and volume reduction. Prioritization:Medium Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD, Private Landowners Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown Lafayette Bay (LF) Subwatershed Improvements Currently, no localized stormwater management improvement projects have been identified for the Lafayette Bay (LF) subwatershed. Should any improvement sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 40 Lake Classen (LC) Subwatershed Improvements Currently, no localized stormwater management improvement projects have been identified for the Lake Classen (LC) subwatershed. Should any improvement sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. Long Lake (LL) Subwatershed Improvements LL-1. East Long Lake Road Due to precipitation increases, more frequent flooding is being observed on East Long Lake Road just south of Spring Hill Road. The top of the road in this area is approximately just a couple feet above the normal water level of the wetland on the east side and lake on the west side. During larger events, runoff overtops the road creating unsafe driving conditions. Street and culvert improvements and stormwater treatment should be considered for this location. Removal of a portion of the street in conjunction with trail and stormwater treatment and conveyance improvements would limit flood potential and provide stormwater quality improvement. Prioritization:High Estimated Cost: $77,000 Project Partner(s): None Funding Source(s): City Timeframe: Unknown Maxwell Bay (MB) Subwatershed Improvements MB-1. Farview Lane Runoff draining from Stormwater Pond 4-3, located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Farview Lane and Fox Street, currently flows through a 15” culvert under Fox Street, then through a section of ravine before flowing through an 18” culvert under Farview Lane, and then through a final section of ravine before outletting to Maxwell Bay of Lake Minnetonka. The culvert under Farview Lane is in extremely poor condition, and the road slope is beginning to undercut due to culvert failure on the upstream end. In addition, the ravine has eroded to a depth of a few feet, resulting in the transport of eroded sediments. Due to imminent failure of the road crossing, storm sewer improvements should be considered for this area. Due to erosion, restoration of the ravine should also be considered for the open channel segments along this flow path. As such, this project should be coordinated with Section 5.6. Prioritization:Medium Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD Timeframe: Unknown Mooney Lake(MO) Subwatershed Improvements Currently, no localized stormwater management improvement projects have been identified for the Mooney Lake (MO) subwatershed. Should any improvement sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 41 North Arm (NA) Subwatershed Improvements NA-1. Cherry Place Runoff draining in the neighborhood of 1330 Cherry Place currently drains through a ravine to Lake Minnetonka. The ravine was recently stabilized by the adjacent landowner with vegetation, erosion control blanket, and riprap. Additional improvements may have been added by local residents to improve pedestrian flow between Spruce Place and Cherry Place. The installed improvements have resulted in flooding of the adjacent sanitary lift station. Due to lack of conveyance capacity, storm sewer improvements should be considered for this location to limit flooding potential of the lift station Prioritization:High Estimated Cost: $23,100.00 Project Partner(s): None Funding Source(s): City Timeframe: Unknown Painters Creek (PC) Subwatershed Improvements PC-1. McCulley Road Runoff from the east side of McCulley Road, from approximately Bayside Road to Watertown Road, currently drains to a submerged 24” pipe crossing just north of the Luce Line Trail crossing. Due to the submerged design and beaver activity, maintenance is difficult and flooding of the adjacent trail frequently occurs. Due to maintenance difficulties and lack of conveyance capacity, storm sewer improvements should be considered for this location to limit flooding potential of the adjacent trail. In addition, beaver management should be included with improvements to limit maintenance required to maintain flow rates and normal water levels (i.e. pond leveler, culvert protector, etc.). Outlet control structure improvements should be considered in this location, as well, to provide adequate runoff rate control and limit flooding potential. As such, this project should be coordinated with Section 5.3. Prioritization:Medium Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD Timeframe: Unknown Peavey Lake (PL) Subwatershed Improvements Currently, no localized stormwater management improvement projects have been identified for the Peavey Lake (PL) subwatershed. Should any improvement sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. Smith Bay (SM) Subwatershed Improvements Currently, no localized stormwater management improvement projects have been identified for the Smith Bay (SM) subwatershed. Should any improvement sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. Stubbs Bay (SB) Subwatershed Improvements Currently, no localized stormwater management improvement projects have been City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 42 identified for the Stubbs Bay (SB) subwatershed. Should any improvement sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. Tanager Lake (TL) Subwatershed Improvements TL-1. Hackberry Park Hackberry Park is located on the west side of Willow Drive North, between Elm Lane and Maple Lane. Runoff draining to Hackberry Park currently discharges through an inlet on the north side of park into the storm sewer system and flows west to Tanager Lake without any treatment. Due to the lack of inlet and conveyance capacity, flooding is observed during larger rain events. In order to provide water quality improvement and limit flood potential, a sump manhole with flow baffle, new inlets, and storm sewer improvements should be considered for this location. The retrofit sump manhole would provide stormwater runoff treatment from a previously untreated area of Orono, improving the quality of runoff reaching Lake Minnetonka, and ultimately Minnehaha Creek. In addition, flooding potential would be minimized due to increased conveyance capacity. Prioritization:Low Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown TL-2. Orono Public Golf Course The Orono Public Golf Course is located on the west side of Orono Orchard Road South just south of the intersection with Luce Line Trail. Runoff from the east side of Orono Orchard Road drains under the road and through a wetland and pond on the east side of the Course , outletting through a 24” culvert under Luce Line Trail, and ultimately flowing to Tanager Lake. The west side of the Course drains west through wetlands and ultimately to Tanager Lake. Due to precipitation increases, more frequent flooding is being observed in a few areas of the Course. In order to limit flood potential, volume reduction, storage capacity, and storm conveyance improvements should be considered for this location. Bioretention areas and conveyance improvements would provide volume reduction, additional storage capacity, and improved flow characteristics, thus limiting flood potential. Also, these improvements would provide additional stormwater runoff treatment, improving the quality of runoff reaching Lake Minnetonka, and ultimately Minnehaha Creek Prioritization:Medium Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown West Arm (WA) Subwatershed Improvements Currently, no localized stormwater management improvement projects have been identified for the West Arm (WA) subwatershed. Should any improvement sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. Should any additional localized stormwater treatment improvement projects be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed projects. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 43 5.5 Wetland Restorations 5.5.1 Proposed Wetland Restoration Sites Restoration projects will be coordinated with and TMDL reduction managed through the City’s SWPPP. The following are wetland restoration projects identified to help manage stormwater runoff and improve water quality. W-1. Wetland Restoration Opportunities Collaborate with MCWD and private landowners to restore degraded or drained wetland areas as opportunities arise. Wetland areas will be evaluated on an individual basis for water quality treatment benefits, additional storage capacity, and educational and recreational value.In general, Orono will consider conservation, preservation, and wetland restoration when development proposals are submitted. More specifically, Orono will implement its buffer requirements per City code, and when development is proposed in key conservation areas, the City will promote low impact development techniques. These projects will help meet the goal of improving the quality and quantity of wetlands in Orono, increase flood storage, and improve the quality of runoff to Lake Minnetonka. Prioritization:Medium Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD, Private Landowners Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown Should any additional wetland restoration sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. 5.6 Natural Area Preservation and Restoration 5.6.1 Proposed Natural Area Preservation and Restoration Sites The City will be available to work with MCWD and private landowners to investigate potential natural area preservation and restoration sites. The City will also require preserving natural upland areas and creating natural upland corridors during development planning per the requirements listed in the City code. Preservation and restoration projects will be coordinated with and TMDL reduction managed through the City’s SWPPP. The following are localized stormwater treatment improvement projects identified to help manage stormwater runoff and improve water quality. N-1. North Arm Drive Ravine Stabilization Collaborate with MCWD to stabilize an existing ravine (approximately 100’) in the neighborhood of 650 North Arm Drive that has eroded to a depth of several feet. Due to excessive sediment and organic material loads from erosion, Stubbs Bay of Lake Minnetonka is being prematurely filled in and additional load is being transported downstream. This contributes to increased sediment and phosphorus loads and reduced dissolved oxygen in runoff, and is extremely detrimental to water quality. In order to reduce detrimental impacts on downstream systems, this ravine needs to be stabilized. To repair the ravine, the City will design a stable cross-section, install limestone grade control weirs with plunge pools, and plant deep rooting native vegetation. Placement of boulder toe protection will stabilize side slopes and reduce erosion, installation of City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 44 limestone weirs will assist with dissolved phosphorus removal and reduce erosion by slowing runoff flow through the ravine, and planting of native vegetation will stabilize slopes, reduce erosion, and assist in phosphorus removal. Prioritization:Medium Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown N-2. Tonkawa Road Ravine Stabilization Collaborate with MCWD to stabilize an existing ravine (approximately 400’) in the neighborhood of 420 Tonkawa Road that has eroded to a depth of several feet. Due to excessive sediment and organic material loads from erosion, North Arm Bay of Lake Minnetonka is being prematurely filled in and additional load is being transported downstream. This contributes to increased sediment and phosphorus loads and reduced dissolved oxygen in runoff, and is extremely detrimental to water quality. In order to reduce detrimental impacts on downstream systems, this ravine needs to be stabilized. To repair the ravine, the City will design a stable cross-section, install limestone grade control weirs with plunge pools, and plant deep rooting native vegetation. Placement of boulder toe protection will stabilize side slopes and reduce erosion, installation of limestone weirs will assist with dissolved phosphorus removal and reduce erosion by slowing runoff flow through the ravine, and planting of native vegetation will stabilize slopes, reduce erosion, and assist in phosphorus removal. Prioritization:Medium Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown N-3. Farview Lane Ravine Stabilization Runoff draining from Stormwater Pond 4-3, located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Farview Lane and Fox Street, currently flows through a 15” culvert under Fox Street, then through a section of ravine before flowing through an 18” culvert under Farview Lane, and then through a final section of ravine before outletting to Maxwell Bay of Lake Minnetonka. The culvert under Farview Lane is in extremely poor condition, and the road slope is beginning to undercut due to culvert failure on the upstream end. In addition, the ravine has eroded to a depth of a few feet, resulting in the transport of eroded sediments. Due to excessive sediment and organic material loads from erosion, Maxwell Bay of Lake Minnetonka is being prematurely filled in and additional load is being transported downstream. This contributes to increased sediment and phosphorus loads and reduced dissolved oxygen in runoff, and is extremely detrimental to water quality. In order to reduce detrimental impacts on downstream systems, this ravine needs to be stabilized. To repair the ravine, the City will design a stable cross-section, install limestone grade control weirs with plunge pools, and plant deep rooting native vegetation. Placement of boulder toe protection will stabilize side slopes and reduce erosion, installation of limestone weirs will assist with dissolved phosphorus removal and reduce erosion by slowing runoff flow through the ravine, and planting of native vegetation will stabilize slopes, reduce erosion, and assist in phosphorus removal. Also, due to imminent failure of the road crossing, storm sewer improvements should be considered for this area. As such, this project should be coordinated with Section 5.4. Prioritization:Medium City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 45 Estimated Cost: Unknown Project Partner(s): MCWD Funding Source(s): City, MCWD, Grant funding Timeframe: Unknown Should any additional natural area preservation or restoration sites be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. 5.7 Education 5.7.1 Proposed Education Programs and Tools The City will continue to maintain the existing storm drainage system. Additionally, the City will be available to work with MCWD to investigate the implementation of education programs and tools to inform the public about water quality issues and solutions. Education programs and tools will be coordinated with and managed through the City’s SWPPP. The following are education programs and tools identified to help inform the public regarding stormwater runoff management and methods to improve water quality. The following are only listed here as possible education strategies. The City will meet annually with MCWD’s Education Coordinator to discuss goals and strategies each year and create short, specific annual education plans. As annual plans are assembled, the City’s SWPPP will be updated to list the specific education strategies developed. 1. Education Programs and Tools for Home/Landowners ·Provide sticker “Keep Grass Clippings on the Lawn!” with brochure explaining the detrimental effect of grass clippings on water quality when transported to water bodies. The sticker could be placed on lawnmowers as a reminder. Stickers may possibly be obtained from MCWD for distribution by the City. Method of distribution would have to be determined by the City. ·Provide bookmarkers/brochures regarding a variety of water quality topics, including 1) common household pollutants, contaminants, and waste and proper disposal methods, 2) raingardens, 3) Total Maximum Daily Loads, 4) reducing water footprint, 5) stormwater ponds, and 6) phosphorus-free fertilizer. The City could collaborate with MCWD for development of bookmarkers/brochures for distribution by the City. Method of distribution would have to be determined by the City. ·Promote reduction of water footprint. The City could collaborate with MCWD to promote and provide rain barrels at a reduced cost, a mulch/compost dump site at no cost during certain times of year, and tree whips at a reduced cost in the spring. 2. Education Programs and Tools for Decision Makers ·Collaborate with MCWD to hold District Stormwater Workshops. This workshop would be intended to educate developers, city staff, and elected officials regarding stormwater Best Management Practices and new developments in stormwater research. ·Collaborate with MCWD to provide Non-point Source Education for Municipal Officials (NEMO) opportunities. NEMO is intended to educate decision makers about the relationship between land use and water quality. ·Collaborate with MCWD to offer tours of current and upcoming stormwater City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 46 management projects. Tours would help provide education necessary for policy makers to make informed decisions. 3. Education Programs and Tools for K-12 Students ·Collaborate with MCWD to participate in a variety of student education programs. The Metro Area Children’s Water Festival (CWF) held at the state fairgrounds educates metro area 4 th graders about the importance of water in the natural environment. Envirothon is an outdoor learning competition for high school students in grades 9 through 12. It is one of the state's largest environmental education initiatives. The program is coordinated by local Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs). World Water Monitoring Day (WWMD) is an event that provides teachers with a kit that students can use to test water quality of any waterbody. The results can then be entered in a large online database. In addition, MCWD offers numerous workshops and tours throughout the year. Should any additional education programs and tools be identified in the future, this plan should be updated to include proposed sites. 5.8 Surface Water Management Costs and Funding Considerations The cost and funding considerations contained in this plan are included for scoping purposes only. Prior to including projects into the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), further investigation is required into conditions meriting improvement and correction/mitigation strategies to be implemented. This plan recognizes the changing regulatory environment and evolving technologies necessary to understand prior to further developing a CIP or construction schedule. 5.8.1 Capital Improvement Plan The City manages capital expenditures for surface water management as part of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP provides long-term planning and management of infrastructure throughout the City. The CIP is a planning document that presents a 5+ year overview of scheduled capital projects to address the City’s goals for public infrastructure. The CIP includes a long-term financing plan that allows the City to allocate funds for these projects based on assigned priorities. The 5+ year horizon of the CIP provides the City with an opportunity to evaluate project priorities annually and to adjust the timing, scope and cost of projects as new information becomes available. The information contained in this plan represents an estimate of improvement costs based on present knowledge and expected conditions. Changes in community priorities, infrastructure condition and inflation rates require that adjustments be made on a routine basis. The Surface Water Management Plan CIP includes budgeting for stream and shoreline restoration, outlet control structure improvements, localized storage, volume reduction, and water quality improvements, wetland restoration, natural area preservation and restoration, education, stormwater treatment system mapping, and maintenance. Refer to Appendix E for Orono’s 5-Year Surface Water Management Plan CIP. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 47 CITY OF ORONO - SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 6 Administration 6.1 REVIEW AND ADOPTION PROCESS Review and adoption of this Surface Water Management Plan will follow the procedure outlined in Minnesota Statutes 103B.235: ·‘After consideration but before adoption by the governing body, each local government unit shall submit its water management plan to the watershed management organization[s] for review for consistency with the watershed plan. The organization[s] shall have 60 days to complete its review.’ ·‘Concurrently with its submission of its local water management plan to the watershed management organization, each local government unit shall submit its water management plan to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment. The council shall have 45 days to review and comment upon the local plan. The council’s 45-day review period shall run concurrently with the 60-day review period by the watershed management organization. The Metropolitan Council shall submit its comments to the watershed management organization and shall send a copy of its comments to the local government unit.’ ·‘After approval of the local plan by the watershed management organization[s], the local government unit shall adopt and implement its plan within 120 days, and shall amend its official controls accordingly within 180 days.’ Thereafter, Orono must annually report to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District activities it has undertaken in the previous year in implementing its plan and in progress toward meeting water quantity, water quality, and ecological integrity goals. The watershed will develop guidelines for the content of this annual report. 6.2 COLLABORATION WITH OTHER ENTITIES Although the City coordinates with numerous agencies with respect to Surface water management, the city recognizes the benefits that arise from close coordination with the MCWD. Therefore, the City and MCWD have established a coordination plan that can be implemented at a staff level. Improving coordination at the concept level planning phase between land use planning at the City and watershed planning at the MCWD will result in better projects that meet both organizations’ goals and are a more efficient use of public funds. Early coordination and collaboration between entities is the key to maximizing shared water resource goals and community goals for private redevelopment and public capital improvements. It is the intent of the City to leverage this coordination to efficiently manage water quality, natural resource threats and opportunities that arise through land use change, our shared interest in conservation, and overall maximize the asset value of the City’s natural resources in the future. Coordination Plan The following coordination plan will be adjusted and expanded as deemed appropriate by the City and MCWD during implementation. The City Administrator is the primary City contact and the District Administrator will be the District contact for the coordination plan. 1.Annual meeting – City and MCWD staff will meet during the first quarter of each year to review the following: a.National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) reports and activity from the previous year b.Draft Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) for each organization for the upcoming year. The City will focus coordination of the Streets, Stormwater and Park CIPs with MCWD. c.Opportunities for early coordination and review of land use change applications d.Regulatory coordination to identify areas of collaboration e.Operation, maintenance, and management of Big Island Nature Park f.Areas for improved coordination and process improvement. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 48 g.Public Education plans, resources and opportunities. 2.Land Use Planning and Regulatory Coordination- The City of Orono staff will continue to route requests for land use approvals, including but not limited to, subdivisions, site plan approvals, WCA applications to the District in an effort to maximize water resource benefits and streamline regulatory processes. Specific areas of regulatory coordination include the following: a.The City will continue to rely on MCWD to maintain authority for reviewing and approving applications for compliance with MCWD’s rules and enforcing those rules as necessary. The City will rely on the water resource management standards set forth by MCWD and their management of the Wetland Conservation Act in Orono. Since all wetlands within the City are within the MCWD boundaries, in an effort to avoid overlapping or conflicting regulations, the City defers jurisdiction for the regulation of wetlands to the MCWD. b.The City will require documentation of required MCWD permits in advance of issuing applicable City permits. Approved MCWD permits will be stored with other project documentation for future reference. c.Pre-application meetings and permit reviews will be coordinated with MCWD early in the planning process as necessary. d.The City will continue to collaborate with MCWD on construction site inspections and compliance. e.MCWD will keep the City appraised of water resource violations and expectations for compliance. f.Key Conservation areas- The City will assist MCWD in the preservation of those areas identified by MCWD by considering them in land use and zoning decisions. g.The primary person responsible for regulatory coordination at the City of Orono is Community Development Director and the Permitting Program Manager at MCWD h.The City and MCWD will include each other in the notification protocols for Illicit Discharges. 3.Public Infrastructure Improvements. The City of Orono staff will continue to route significant infrastructure improvements (streets, stormwater and parks in particular) to the MCWD as early in the planning as possible in order to maximize resourcing opportunities, reduce any regulatory process delays and solicit any best practice expertise/ experience. a.Infrastructure and land improvements that require MCWD permits will be coordinated early in the planning and design process so that the regulatory process may be efficient and integrated water and natural resource improvements may be explored. b.The City will brief the MCWD on the Streets, Stormwater and Parks CIPs each year at the annual meeting. The City intends to coordinate applicable projects at the concept stage of project development partner, on competitive grant programs and leverage MCWD technical resources and planning assistance. c.Big Island Nature Park Management – The city will continue to coordinate with MCWD as agreed in the Park management Plan and Associated Easements. It is the intention of the agencies to jointly review the Management Plan on a regular basis to address new and ongoing Park management issues. The primary person responsible for Big Island Nature Park activities at the City of Orono is The Public Works Director and the Project and Land Manager at MCWD 4.MCWD on public communications and education coordination and partnership. The City will provide support and assistance to MCWD with the District’s educational programs in the form of information sharing and help with promotion materials. The City will identify target audiences and educational needs and collaborate with MCWD to create educational opportunities to meet these needs. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 49 5.Long Lake Creek Subwatershed Partnership. The City will continue to join with its partners in the Long Lake Creek Subwatershed Partnership to implement shared water resource improvement efforts; align local plans and capital investment to identify opportunities where local investments intersect with natural resource goals. The City looks to MCWD, as the regional agency, to facilitate the coordination and provide technical expertise to the group. 6.3 PLAN AMENDMENTS Periodic amendments may be required to incorporate changes in local practices. In particular, changes in the MCWD Watershed Management Plan may require revisions to this plan. Plan amendments will be incorporated by following the review and adoption steps outlined above. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 50 CITY OF ORONO - SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 7 APPENDICES Appendix A: Figures Study Area ................................................................................................... Figure No. 1 Existing Land Use…… ................................................................................. Figure No. 2 Future Land Use ........................................................................................... Figure No. 3 Soils ............................................................................................................. Figure No. 4 Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) ............................... Figure No. 5 National Wetland Inventory and DNR Public Waters .................................... Figure No. 6 Impaired Waters ........................................................................................... Figure No. 7 Storm Sewer Map ......................................................................................... Figure No. 8 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o n gLake Cree k Painter Cree kCrystal Bay-LakeMinnetonkaWatershed LowerLake MinnetonkaWatershed Highland Ave TuxedoBlvd6 t h Ave N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad 19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN S h o r eline D r CountyRoad1011 8th AveN NArmDr BrownRoadN19th A v eN FerndaleRoadS8th Ave N N Shore Dr RiceStE W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Gull LnWayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad W a y z a t a B l vd WKelley Pk w yRanchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St Larchwo o dDr LakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Av e N ParkPl P a in t e rR o ad OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRi d g eview DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NFox St Old LongLa keRoa d Day PlCounty Road 83Spring HillRoadW Branch Road Game Farm R oa d E 5thA ve N Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC ygnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly A veCounty Road 90CrosbyRoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SDunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NTown Line RoadVicksburg Ln NBushawayRoadLeroy StStubbs Bay Road NSusse xDrTroy L n N Farvi ew Ln Map Document: \\arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_SW01_StudyArea_11x17.mxd | Date Saved: 6/6/2018 10:30:34 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Study AreaJune 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Figure T-6 Watershed Districts Figure 1 HUC 12WatershedBoundary )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongLa k e C reekPaint er Cree k Minneton k a B lvdWilliston RoadLake St Extension Highland Ave TuxedoBlvd6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN Tonkawood RoadS h o r eline D r CountyRoad101Interstate 494Highwoo d D r 1 8th AveN NArm D r BrownRoadNShorelineDrHighway 7 19th Av e NOaklan dRo a d FerndaleRoadSWoodhillRoadInterstate 394 8th Ave N StoneR oad Rice St E Watertown Road G l e a s o n L a k e Dr Pa i n t e r R o a d 21 s t A v e N 3rdAve N Gull LnWayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad W a y zata B lv d W Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwo o dDr Drake Dr LakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Av e N ParkPl D e v on DrParkAve OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave CarlsonPkwy9thA v e NRi d g eview DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NFox St OldLongLake Road Day Pl 23rd Ave N County Road 83Spring HillRoadTemp le Dr Ga meF a r m R o a d E Crown DrEastwoodRoad5thAve N Moline Road Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC ygnetPlW Branch Road Turner Road Kelly A ve VineHillRoadCountyRoad101CrosbyRoadHarbor LnNBartlettBlvd Highland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr LinnerRoadDunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIsla n d V iew DrNiagara Ln NTown Line RoadVicksburg Ln NWoodruffR o a d Leroy StStubbs Bay Road NTroy L n N Farvi ew Ln Map Document: \\arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_SW02_Landuse_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 2/20/2018 11:47:11 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Existing Land UseJune 2018 Legend City Limits Wetlands Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Land Use Classes Rural Preserve(1 unit / 5 acres) RuralResidential (1unit / 2 acres) IslandResidential Low DensityResidential (0.5- 2 units / acre) Medium DensityResidential (2-7units / acre) High DensityResidential (7-20 units / acre) Commercial /Office Industrial Park,Recreational,and OpenSpace Undeveloped Right-of-Way Figure 2 DickeysLake GVWX112 WayzataBlvdWWillow Dr NKelley PkwyOld Crystal Bay Road NBrownRoadNWillowView Dr Dickey L akeDrSugarwoo dDrLakeMinnetonka GVWX19 GVWX15Blaine AveS h adywoodRoad Shoreline Dr N o r t h e r n A v e Crystal Pl Lyric Av e O live A ve BayviewP lLivingston Ave D u n w o o d y A v e KellyAve Inset 1 Inset 2 Inset 1 Inset 2 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongLa k e C reekPaint er Cree k Minneton k a B lvdWilliston RoadLake St Extension Highland Ave TuxedoBlvd6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN Tonkawood RoadS h o r eline D r CountyRoad101Interstate 494Highwoo d D r 1 8th AveN NArm D r BrownRoadNShorelineDrHighway 7 19th Av e NOaklan dRo a d FerndaleRoadSWoodhillRoadInterstate 394 8th Ave N StoneR oad Rice St E Watertown Road G l e a s o n L a k e Dr Pa i n t e r R o a d 21 s t A v e N 3rdAve N Gull LnWayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad W a y zata B lv d W Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwo o dDr Drake Dr LakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Av e N ParkPl D e v on DrParkAve OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave CarlsonPkwy9thA v e NRi d g eview DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NFox St OldLongLake Road Day Pl 23rd Ave N County Road 83Spring HillRoadTemp le Dr Ga meF a r m R o a d E Crown DrEastwoodRoad5thAve N Moline Road Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC ygnetPlW Branch Road Turner Road Kelly A ve VineHillRoadCountyRoad101CrosbyRoadHarbor LnNBartlettBlvd Highland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr LinnerRoadDunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIsla n d V iew DrNiagara Ln NTown Line RoadVicksburg Ln NWoodruffR o a d Leroy StStubbs Bay Road NTroy L n N Farvi ew Ln Map Document: \\arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_SW03_FutureLandUse_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 2/20/2018 12:59:13 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Future Land UseJune 2018 Legend City Limits Wetlands Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Land Use Classes Rural Preserve(1 unit / 5 acres) RuralResidential (1unit / 2 acres) IslandResidential Urban LowDensityResidential (0.5- 2 units / acre) Urban MediumDensityResidential (3 -7 units / acre) High DensityResidential (10- 20 units / acre) Commercial /Office Industrial Park,Recreational,and OpenSpace Figure 3 DickeysLake GVWX112 WayzataBlvdWWillow Dr NKelley PkwyOld Crystal Bay Road NBrownRoadNWillowView Dr Dickey L akeDrSugarwoo dDrLakeMinnetonka GVWX19 GVWX15Blaine AveS h adywoodRoad Shoreline Dr N o r t h e r n A v e Crystal Pl Lyric Av e O live A ve BayviewP lLivingston Ave D u n w o o d y A v e KellyAve Inset 1 Inset 2 Inset 1 Inset 2 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongL a k eCreekPainterCreek Minnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave TuxedoBlvd6th Ave N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22ndA veNHighway 12 E Lynwood Blvd Commerce Blvd6thA v e N TonkawoodRoadS h o r eline D r CountyRoad101HighwoodDr 1 8th AveN NArmDr BrownRoadNShorelineDrHighway 7 19th Av e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N N Shore Dr RiceStE W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Gull LnWayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad W a y zata B lv d W Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwo o dDr LakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Av e N ParkPl Pa i n t e r R o a d D e v on DrParkAve OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRi d g eview DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NFox St OldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Spr ingHillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Game Farm R oa d E Eastw oodRoad5thA ve N Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly A ve VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101Crosby RoadBartlettBlvd Highland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIsla n d V iew DrTown Line RoadVicksburg Ln NLeroy StStubbs Bay Road NSusse xDrTroy L n N Farvi ew Ln Map Document: \\arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_SW04_Soils_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 2/20/2018 10:36:35 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN SoilsJune 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Soils By Drainage Class Unclassified A A/D B B/D C C/D Figure 4 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongL a k eCreekPainterCreek Minnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave TuxedoBlvd6th Ave N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22ndA veNHighway 12 E Lynwood Blvd Commerce Blvd6thA v e N TonkawoodRoadS h o r eline D r CountyRoad101HighwoodDr 1 8th AveN NArmDr BrownRoadNShorelineDrHighway 7 19th Av e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N N Shore Dr RiceStE W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Gull LnWayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad W a y zata B lv d W Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwo o dDr LakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Av e N ParkPl Pa i n t e r R o a d D e v on DrParkAve OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRi d g eview DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NFox St OldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Spr ingHillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Game Farm R oa d E Eastw oodRoad5thA ve N Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly A ve VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101Crosby RoadBartlettBlvd Highland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIsla n d V iew DrTown Line RoadVicksburg Ln NLeroy StStubbs Bay Road NSusse xDrTroy L n N Farvi ew Ln Map Document: \\arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_SW05_MLCCS_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 2/20/2018 10:26:31 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Minnesota Land Cover ClassificationJune 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I MLCCS 11. 5-10%Impervious 12. 11-25%Impervious 13. 26-50%Impervious 14. 51-75%Impervious 15. 76-100%Impervious 21. ShortGrasses 22. AgriculturalLand 23. MaintainedTall Grass 24. TreePlantation 31. Forest 32. WetlandForest 51. Shrubland 52. WetlandShrubs 61. TallGrasses 62. WetlandEmergent Veg. 63. Dry TallGrasses 90. OpenWater 92. WetlandOpen Water Figure 5 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongL a k eCreekPainte r Creek L o ngLakeCreek PainterCreek Minnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave TuxedoBlvd6th Ave N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22ndA veNHighway 12 E Lynwood Blvd Commerce Blvd6thA v e N TonkawoodRoadS h o r eline D r CountyRoad101HighwoodDr 1 8th AveN NArmDr BrownRoadNShorelineDrHighway 7 19th Av e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N N Shore Dr RiceStE W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Gull LnWayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad W a y zata B lv d W Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwo o dDr LakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Av e N ParkPl Pa i n t e r R o a d D e v on DrParkAve OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRi d g eview DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NFox St OldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Spr ingHillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Game Farm R oa d E Eastw oodRoad5thA ve N Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly A ve VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101Crosby RoadBartlettBlvd Highland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIsla n d V iew DrTown Line RoadVicksburg Ln NLeroy StStubbs Bay Road NSusse xDrTroy L n N Farvi ew Ln Map Document: \\arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_SW06_Wetlands_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 2/20/2018 1:44:31 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN National Wetlands Inventory & DNR Public WatersJune 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Wetlands StormwaterPonds NationalWetlandsInventory PWI - Basin PWI -Watercourse Figure 6 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Long LakeC r e ekPainterCreek MinnehahaC r e ek PainterCreek Gleason Lake ParkersLake Snyder Lake Hadley Lake MooneyLake Peavey Lake Forest Lake TanagerLake Wolsfeld Lake Long Lake Dutch Lake Langdon Lake LakeMinnetonka-Grays Bay LakeMinnetonka-Lower Lake LakeMinnetonka-Upper Lake LakeMinnetonka-Halsteds Bay LakeMinnetonka-Crystal Bay LakeMinnetonka-Maxwell Bay LakeMinnetonka-Stubbs Bay LakeMinnetonka-North Arm LakeMinnetonka-West Arm LakeMinnetonka-Jennings Bay MinnetonkaBlvd Lake St Extension Highland Av e TuxedoBlvd6th Ave N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22ndA veNLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadS h o r eline D r HighwoodDr 1 8th AveN Azure RoadBrownRoadNShorelineDr Highway 7 19th Av e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N N S horeDr RiceStE W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Gull LnWayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad McGintyRoadW W a y z ata B lvd W Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Gra ysB a yBlvdRanchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St Map lewoo d RoadSparrowRoadLarchwo o dDr LakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Av e N ParkPl Pa i n t e r R o a d D e v on DrParkAve OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave Hal st ead LnMan o rR o a d 2 0 th Ave N 9thA v e NRidge v i e wDr EOld Crystal Bay Road NFox St OldLongLake R o a dRidgewood R o a d Day PlHeritageLnCounty Road 83Rai nbowDrRinger R oa d Spring HillRoadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Game Farm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN WildhurstT rl Moline Road N Arm Dr WayzataBlvdW Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkPea vey Ln C y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90ManitouR o a dCounty Road 101S hadywood Road G leasonLakeRoadCrosbyRoadBartlettBlvd Highland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NWillow D r SLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StBrown Road SIsla n d V iew DrTown Line RoadVicksburg Ln NWoodhillRoa dLakev i e wPkwy Leroy StStubbs Bay Road NSusse xDrTroy L n N Farvi ew Ln Hi llside D rWMap Document: \\arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_SW07_ImpairedWaters_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 6/12/2018 11:15:24 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Impaired WatersJune 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Surface Water Impaired Lakes Impaired Rivers& Streams Figure 7 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongL a k eCreekPainterCreek Minnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave TuxedoBlvd6th Ave N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22ndA veNHighway 12 E Lynwood Blvd Commerce Blvd6thA v e N TonkawoodRoadS h o r eline D r CountyRoad101HighwoodDr 1 8th AveN NArmDr BrownRoadNShorelineDrHighway 7 19th Av e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N N Shore Dr RiceStE W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Gull LnWayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad W a y zata B lv d W Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwo o dDr LakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Av e N ParkPl Pa i n t e r R o a d D e v on DrParkAve OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRi d g eview DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NFox St OldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Spr ingHillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Game Farm R oa d E Eastw oodRoad5thA ve N Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly A ve VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101Crosby RoadBartlettBlvd Highland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIsla n d V iew DrTown Line RoadVicksburg Ln NLeroy StStubbs Bay Road NSusse xDrTroy L n N Farvi ew Ln Map Document: \\arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_SW08_ExistingStorm_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 6/6/2018 10:26:59 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Existing Storm Sewer SystemJune 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Storm Sewer System Storm Pipe (ByDiameter) N/A 8" 12" 15" 18" 21" 24" 27' 30" 32" Figure 8 City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 51 Appendix B: Subwatershed Maps 10-yr and 100-yr Rainfall Events A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R RR "/"/%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 )n G¡WX GsWX )n1020101010009909809701010100099098097010101000990970 10009909701010 1000 980 10 0 0 9901 0 0 0 9 9 0 970 990980 990970 10101000 1000 990980970 990980 990 980 980970980970970 960970 960 1 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 96010209 9 0 9801000 1000 1010 10009901000 1000 990970 990 970980 970 1010 1 0 0 0 1000 10001000990990990 980 970 980980 970970970970 9 7 0 990 990 970 970 970 970 970 9 6 0 SPRUCE WAY WAYZATABLVDW C reekwoodT rTOWN LINE RDPC-P01 PC-P07 Q10=13cfsQ10=75 cfsQ10=51 cfsQ 1 0 = 1 5 cfs Q10=51 cfsQ10=24 cfsQ10=64 cfsQ10=453 cfsPC-P012209.5 Ac PC-P19283.3 Ac PC-P0763.8 Ac PC-05056.3 Ac PC-05056.3 Ac PC-P02168.0 Ac PC-119524.2 Ac PC-0017.4 Ac PC-04516.0 Ac PC-O-02PC-O-01 Q o v e r =1 5 c f s 18-in18-in1 8 -i n 60-in60-in24-in72-inK a t r i n a P a i n t e r C r e e k 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B1 A2 B2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I A1 Page 1 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GeWX 10501040103010201 01010009909 80 970 102010101000990 10101000 10201010100010009901000990 9 8 0 970 10101000990 9909801010 1000 10009 9 01000990 990980101010001000990 980970 10301 0 2 0 990980100010101020 1020 1 0 1 0 9 8 0 1 0 3 01030 1020 1 0 2 0 10201 0 2 0 1010 101010101010 101010001 0 0 0 1000 10001000990990 990 980 980990990 98 0980970990 9709709 7 0 970 9 7 0 970 S I X T H A V E N J a m estown Rd HOMESTEADTRLC-P01 LC-P02 LC-P03 PC-P02 PC-P06 Q10=453cfs Q10=72cfs Q10=151 cfs Q10=110 cfs Q10=29 cfsQ10=11 cfs Q 1 0 = 1 8 cfs Q10=5 cfsQ 10=21 cfs Q10=5 cfs Q10=111 cfs LC-P038.9 Ac LC-P0211.2 Ac LC-P0112.9 Ac LC-011184.0 Ac LC-09315.4 Ac LC-00518.5 Ac LC-00340.1 Ac PC-P012209.5 Ac PC-P012209.5 Ac PC-0193.0 Ac PC-P0615.6 Ac PC-0164.0 Ac PC-11731.3 Ac PC-04290.3 Ac PC-04013.5 Ac PC-P02168.0 Ac PC-119524.2 Ac PC-O-03 Q o v er=8 cfs Qover=148 cfs Q o v e r =3 3 c f s 30- i n1 2-in 12-in 12-in 3 6 -i n 12-i n24-in 2 4-in L a k e C l a s s e n K a t r i n a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B2 A1 B1 A3 B3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I A2 Page 2 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R RRR R R "/"/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ !*" %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 GeWX 1030 102010101000990 1030 1020 1010 1000 990 980 1030 1020 1000 980 10301020101010001020100099010201000 9 9 0 103010101020 1010 10 5 0 1040 103010201 0 1 0 1000 101010 0 09 909 8 0 9601040 1 0 2 0 1010 1000 1000 990 10601050105010401020 1010 1 0 2 0101010101000 980 97 0 1050 10 4 0 1010 9 7 0960 10301 0 1 0 1010 1030 1 0 3 0 10009901020 1030 103010109 8 0 1050 10501050 1 0 5 0 1040 1050 1040 1040 1040 10401030103010301030102010301 0 2 0 10201 0 2 010101010 1 0 1 0 1010 10101010 1000101010101000 1000100099010009909 9 0 9 8 0 980 980980 9801050 1040 10 3 0 CoxFarmRdWILLOW DR NSalem Ct SIXTH AVE N ShadowoodDr OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD NWILLOW DRBROWN RD NWillowViewDrPhillips DrLL-P03 LL-P19 LL-P22 LL-P23 LL-P24LL-P25 LL-P26 PC-P18 15-in 24-in15-inQ 1 0 = 4 9 cfsQ10=3cfsQ10=4cfsQ10=26cfsQ10=12cfsQ10=2cfsQ10=7cfsQ10=5 cfs Q10=2cfsQ10=16 cfs Q10=36 cfsQ 10=81 cfs Q10=21cfsQ10=2 cfsQ 1 0 = 7 4 cfs Q10=16cfs Q10=62 cfsQ10=29 cfs Q10=7cfsQ10=2cf sQ10=64 cfsQ1 0 = 7 c f s Q10=3 cfsQ10=2 cf sQ10=56 cfsQ10=151 cfs Q 1 0 =5 3 c f s Q10=72 cfs Q10=12 cfs LL-P038.1 Ac LL-2330.6 Ac LL-P042.8 Ac LL-P195.8 Ac LL-P2214.9 Ac LL-P2310.9 Ac LL-P252.9 Ac LL-P244.3 Ac LL-0567.5 Ac LL-P21103.6 Ac LL-2181.8 Ac LL-2260.7 Ac LL-1667.8 Ac LL-1645.0 Ac LL-2233.5 Ac LL-23173.3 Ac LL-3093.4 Ac LL-3110.9 Ac SB-3188.2 Ac LL-0282.2 Ac LL-0615.8 Ac LL-3190.9 Ac LL-0596.4 Ac LL-0577.1 Ac LL-0534.9 Ac LL-P3120.8 Ac LL-3321586.6 Ac LC-00340.1 Ac PC-P012209.5 Ac PC-11413.9 Ac PC-11731.3 Ac PC-03453.0 Ac PC-04290.3 Ac PC-0363.3 Ac PC-04328.9 Ac PC-1163.5 Ac PC-11512.1 Ac PC-119524.2 Ac PC-O-04 PC-O-07 PC-O-06 LL-O-01 PC-O-08 12-in12-in12-in12-in18-in12-in12-in12-in 24-in 12-in24-in 1 2 -i n 18-in 2 4 -in 24-in15-in15-in 15-in12-in15-in 18-in 12-in15-in12-in 1 8 -i n 24-in18-i n1 2-in 12-in18-in 12-in12-in24-inQover=3 cfsQo v e r = 9 c f s Q over=3 cfs Qover=40 cfs Q o v e r=1 1 5 c fsQover=13 cfsQover=16 cfsQover=5 cfsQover=7 cfs Q ov er=64 cfs Qover=2 cfs Qo v e r = 5 5 c f sQover=141 cf sD i c k e y 's L a k e W o l s f e l d 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B3 A2 B2 A4 B4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I A3 Page 3 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9GeWX 1040103010201010102010101000990970960101010009909801 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 9 9 0 9601 0 0 0 990 9 8 0 970 1020 10101000 980 9 9 0 9 8 0 9 6 0 990980100097010201010103010201010 10201010101010009909909709 9 0 9 7 0 980970 9 9 0980970 9 9 0 9 8 0 980 960 1050 1040 101010001 0 2 0 1 0 1 010201 0 1 0 101010001 0 1 0100 0100099010009901 0 0 0 990 1 0 0 0 990990 980 9 8 0970980970970960103010201030 10201010 10001 0 0 0 99010009909909809 9 0 9 8 0 990 9809 8 0 9 7 0 970 960 970960 9709 6 0 970960 97 0 960 10309801030 97 01030960 9 5 0 1 0 0 095099 0 10301020 1000 1 0 3 0 1030 1 0 3 0 1010 1020 10201020 1020 102010101010 101010101010 10001 0 1 0 1010 1 0 0 0 100010009 9 0 990990 990 990 9 9 0 1000100010001000990 990 980 9 9 0 980990990990980980990990990990990990990 99 0990990970980 9 8 0960 960960970960 9 7 0 990 9 9 0 980970S IXTH AV E NKnollMannorR dTAMARACK DRWynd mereRd Tanglewood RdLAKEVIEWTERLL-P05 LL-P30 LL-P31 LL-P33 LL-P34 LL-P35 LL-P38 LL-P39 LL-P56 LL-P57 Q 1 0 =1 0cfs Q10=2cfs Q10=1 cfsQ10=161 cfs Q10=12cfsQ10=41cfsQ10=160 cfs Q10=78cfs Q 1 0 =1 2 c fs Q 1 0 =3 c f sQ10=1 2cfs Q10=13 cfsQ10=118 cfsQ10=26 cfs Q10=51 cfsQ10=24 cfsQ1 0 = 2 0 c f s Q 10 = 1 80 cfs Q 1 0 =1 1 7 c f s Q10=69 cfs LL-3292162.8 Ac LL-P20488.7 Ac LL-P20488.7 Ac LL-12611.5 Ac LL-P3353.5 Ac LL-3353.5 Ac LL-1278.0 Ac LL-P244.3 Ac LL-05 67.5 A c LL-0615.8 Ac LL-05 96.4 A c LL-P3120.8 Ac LL-P5773.2 Ac LL-3433.1 Ac LL-P3931.0 Ac LL-P057.8 Ac LL-P559.6 Ac LL-3411.3 Ac LL-13320.8 Ac LL-1386.8 Ac LL-1394.6 Ac LL-P3854.3 Ac LL-1368.9 Ac LL-14113.8 Ac LL-P4015.3 Ac LL-0311.7 AcLL-P304.1 Ac LL-P342.8 Ac LL-0324.3 Ac LL-P562.4 Ac LL-13511.3 Ac LL-33915.2 Ac LL-P3742.9 Ac LL-3321586.6 Ac LL-33061.1 Ac LL-O-02 Q over=13 cfsQ o v e r =3 c f s Q o v e r=2 7 c fs 15-in18-in 1 8 -i n 18-in 15-in 48-in 18-in1 2 -i n24-in24-in18-in48-inW o l s f e l d 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B4 A3 B3 A5 B5 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I A4 Page 4 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R "/ "/"/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GeWX10601 0 5 010 209 9 0 1050104010301020101010101000105010401030 1020 1010 1000990104010301020101010201010103010201 0 3 01000 10201010 10 5 0 1 0 4 010401 0 3 0 990980 98 097010501040 10501040 104010301 0 4 01030 10301020103010201 0 2 0 1010 1000 99010009901 0 1 0 10001 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 9 9 01020 980 990 10409 9 098010301030 10 2 0 9 7 0 99010601040 10401040 1040104010401 0 3 0 1030 1030103010301030 10301030 10301 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 10301020 10201 0 2 0 10201 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 100010001000 990 1000 1000990980990990990 9809701 0 0 0 990 9 8 0 HollanderRdSIXTH AVE N HunterPas s HUNTER DRMooneyLakeDrSPR IN G H ILLR D W IL L O W B R O O K DRLL-P08 LL-P11 LL-P39 LL-P40 LL-P43 LL-P44 LL-P45 LL-P46 LL-P48 LL-P58 LL-P59 MO-P01 MO-P02 MO-P03 MO-P04 MO-P05 MO-P07 MO-P08 12-in 4 8 -in Q10=5cfs Q10=7cfs Q 1 0 =12 cfsQ10=9cfsQ10=38 cfs Q 1 0 =4 7 c fs Q10=22 cfsQ10=30 cfsQ 1 0 =8 c f s Q 1 0 =3 0 c f s Q 1 0 =1 0 c fs Q10=16 cfsQ1 0 = 9 c f sQ10=1 cfsQ10=33 cfsQ1 0 =2 0 c f s VOID415.1 Ac VOID7.7 AcMO-P054.4 Ac MO-P036.5 Ac MO-P0424.5 Ac LL-3292162.8 Ac LL-3292162.8 Ac MO-P0713.7 Ac MO-06818.8 Ac LL-0176.0 Ac LL-P109.4 Ac LL-3561.8 Ac LL-P6017.5 Ac LL-P112.2 Ac LL-14526.6 Ac LL-P5773.2 Ac LL-P454.3 Ac LL-P4639.2 Ac LL-P5889.2 Ac LL-1432.2 Ac LL-P591.0 Ac LL-3572.0 Ac LL-00110.5 Ac LL-14421.0 Ac LL-3493.8 Ac LL-P3931.0 Ac LL-14113.8 Ac LL-P4015.3 Ac LL-P4420.3 Ac LL-P4812.2 Ac MO-P0114.7 Ac LL-O-03 LL-O-10 MO-O-01 MO-O-02 M o o n e yLake M o o n e y L a k e Qover=2 cfs Qover=29 cfs Qover=20 cfs Q o v e r=8 cfs Qover=3 cfs Qover=7 cfs 15-in18-in 30-in12-in 12-in 12-in12-in 1 5-in 1 8 -in 24-in15-in48-in54-in1 8 -in 2 4 -in 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B5 A4 B4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I A5 Page 5 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GeWX GeWX 1040103010201010100099098097096095010201000970 1010 990 10401030102010101000103010201010 1000 1000 970 9601010 9909809701 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1000 990 980 10009909809 9 098 01 0 0 0 9 9 0 1000 990 990 980 9 9 0 9 8 0 960 950 940970960 9 4 0 9 8 0 1 0401 0 0 0 960990 9 7 0 9701010 990 970 9709601 0 4 0 10401 0 1 0 10001 0 1 0 10101010 1000 1000 1000 1000 10001000 1000990990990990990 9 8 0 980980980 980 980 980 980 9809709 7 0 960940990 9 9 0 980 970 LUCE LINE TR TurnhamDrS IX T H A V E N MCCULLEY RDCHIPPEWA LA WolvertonPl WATERTOWNRDTOWN LINE RDKokeshFarmRdTURNHAM RDHuntFarmRd DeborahDr ORCHARD PARK RDPC-P10 PC-P11 PC-P12 PC-P13 PC-P14 PC-P15PC-P16 PC-P17 PC-P20 PC-P22 SB-P01 SB-P02 SB-P03 SB-P04 SB-P20 SB-P2112-in1 5 -in 15-in 2 4 -in Q10=40cfsQ10=13cfsQ10=75cfsQ10=47cfsQ10=7cfs Q 1 0 =1 c fs Q 1 0 = 1 5 cfs Q10=15 cfs Q10=1 cfsQ10=9 cfsQ 1 0 =2cfs Q10=1 cfs Q10=13cfs Q 1 0 = 6 4 cfs Q10=29 cfs Q 10=119 cfs Q10=127 cf sQ10=11 cfs Q10=70cfsQ10=45 cfsQ10=29 cfsQ10=57 cfsQ10=158 cfs Q10=13 cfsQ10=23 cfsQ10=8 cfsQ1 0 = 3 3 c f s Q10=35 cfsQ 10 = 3 6 cfs Q 1 0 =1 9 c f s Q1 0 = 8 2 c fs Q10=136 cfs Q10=20 cfsQ10=12 cfsQ10=44 cfsQ10=56 cfsQ10=1 cfsQ10=55 cfsQ10=24 cfs Q10=85 cfsQ 10=8 cfs Q10=55 cfsQ o v e r =1 5 c f s Qover=11 cfsSB-00311.9 Ac SB-P0130.0 Ac SB-1026.7 Ac SB-P0236.6 Ac SB-P2121.3 Ac SB-P0346.8 Ac SB-P203.9 Ac SB-P0415.1 Ac SB-08515.4 Ac SB-10639.9 AcSB-00423.9 Ac SB-020157.3 Ac PC-P19283.3 Ac PC-P169.3 Ac PC-P1050.0 Ac PC-1040.8 Ac PC-1050.6 Ac PC-1021.4 Ac PC-P1140.0 Ac PC-P1222.6 Ac PC-02712.5 Ac PC-P0763.8 Ac PC-P1415.7 Ac PC-P1510.0 Ac PC-0854.0 Ac PC-0953.3 Ac PC-07857.4 Ac PC-05056.3 Ac PC-11323.8 Ac PC-1114.7 Ac PC-1098.3 Ac PC-P02168.0 Ac PC-0017.4 Ac PC-04516.0 Ac PC-03115.3 Ac PC-0790.7 Ac PC-0922.3 Ac PC-07647.6 Ac PC-P2064.4 Ac PC-07214.1 Ac PC-05114.3 Ac PC-P139.1 Ac PC-0832.0 Ac PC-0688.5 Ac PC-P056.0 Ac PC-O-09 PC-O-11 PC-O-12 SB-O-01 P a i n t e r C r e e k Qover=25 cfsQover=13 cfsQover=7 cfsQ o v e r =11 c f s Qover=36 cfsQover=3 cfs Qover=19 cfs Qover=1 cfs Qover=4 cfsQover=33 cfsQover=10 cfsQ o v e r =2 c f s 15-i n 1 2 -in 18-in 12-in12-in1 2-in 12- i n18-in18-in12-in18-in18-in18-in1 8 -i n 1 2 -i n 27-in 1 2-in 18-in12-in18-in24-in24-in 1 8 -i n 12-i n36-in24-in15-in24-in12-in 18-in12-in12-in1 2 -in 5 4-in 15-in24-in 12-in12-in15-in1 2 -in 12-in 6-in0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, A1 A2 C1 B2 C2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I B1 Page 6 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/ !*" !*" !*" %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5!5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 )n GeWX GeWX )n 1 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 10301020 1 0 1 01000 1000 990980 9701 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 3 010 2 0 1010 10101000990980101010009801020101010009901000 990101010001000 980 102010101 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1000 990 10009909809709 9 0970 9809 7 0 1 0 0 0 990 10201000 990 1020 1020990 1000 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1010 980 1 0 0 0 990 9701 04010101000 1000 100 0 1000990990 980 990 980 980 980 980970970970 1000 990 9 8 0 9809 8 0 9 7 0 970 970 9 7 0SIXTHAVEN Lillian L n JacobsMillRd WAYZATA BLVD W WATERTOWN RD USHWYNO12 STUBBS BAY RD NLC-P04 LC-P05 LC-P06 LC-P16 PC-P03 PC-P04PC-P05 PC-P06 PC-P08 PC-P09 PC-P21 12-in6-in12-inQ10=15cfs Q10=15cfs Q10=298cfsQ10=12cfs Q10=29cfsQ10=6cfsQ10=5 cfsQ1 0 = 2 1 c f s Q10=151 cfs Q10=19 cf sQ10=19 cfsQ 1 0 =11 c f s Q10=39 cfs Q 1 0 =9 1 c fsQ10=9 cfsQ10 =2 8 cfs Q 10=56 cfs Q 10 =9 7 cf s Q10=5 cfsQ 10=16 cfs Q10=66 cfsQ10=663 cfsQ 10=219 cfsQ10=7 cfsQ10=5 cfs LL-09116.7 Ac LL-20013.6 Ac LC-034206.6 Ac LC-011184.0 Ac LC-0908.8 Ac LC-P0422.9 Ac LC-017100.5 Ac LC-02314.4 Ac LC-0825.0 Ac LC-P1621.4 Ac LC-0268.4 Ac LC-02520.1 Ac LC-0296.6 Ac LC-0327.0 Ac LC-P1115.7 Ac LC-00518.5 Ac LC-00624.6 Ac LC-00340.1 Ac SB-P1914.5 Ac SB-P2121.3 Ac SB-10639.9 Ac PC-0193.0 Ac PC-P2111.7 Ac PC-P046.2 Ac PC-P0311.2 Ac PC-P0615.6 AcPC-0164.0 Ac PC-0233.6 Ac PC-P089.8 Ac PC-P1050.0 Ac PC-P0915.8 Ac PC-P1140.0 Ac PC-P1222.6 Ac PC-P0763.8 Ac PC-P02168.0 Ac LC-P061.6 Ac SB-1044.6 Ac PC-0143.1 Ac PC-P056.0 Ac PC-O-03 LC-O-04 LC-O-01 LC-O-03 LC-O-06 LC-O-02 Q o v er=8 cfs Qover=12 cfsQ o v e r=2 0 c fs Qover=148 cfs Q o v er = 6 4 cfs Q over=26 cfs Qover=17 cfs 18-in 12-in24-in 18-in 1 2-in 1 5 -i n 15-in15-in 1 5 -in 12-in 24-in 2 7-in 36-in24-in18-in21-in24- i n12-in18-in12-in18-in36-in2 4-in 36-in18-in 21-in 36-in36-in18-in 18-in 15-in L a k e C l a s s e n 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, A1 A2 A3 C2 B1 C1 B3 C3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I B2 Page 7 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/"/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/"/"/"/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/"/"/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/"/"/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/ "/"/"/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/"/ !*" !*" %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5!5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5!5 !5 !5 !5!5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 )n )n 1 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 2 01010 9709601030 1 0 2 0 10101000 10009901 0 1 0 1000990980 970960 1 0 3 0 1020 1030102010301020101010001010 1000 10009909809701 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 103010 1 0 1010 990 10401040 102010301030 1030 1 0 3 01030 1030 1 0 2 0 1030 102010101000 1 0 1 0 10101000 9 9 0 9909 9 0 970 980 9 7 0960 9509501030 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 10 1 0 1000 Sandstone La OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD NSilverView D r WAYZATA BLVD WCobblestone Ct WoodDuckTrl Br i dgewater Dr GLENDALE DR L i l l i an LnGoldenrod WaySANDHILLDRWoodhaven Dr BROWN RD NWill o w ViewDr BoulderDrSandst o ne C tDICKEYLAKEDR Sugarwood Dr WILLOW DR NLL-P01 LL-P02 LL-P06 LL-P16 LL-P19 LL-P27 LL-P28 TL-P08TL-P51 18-in1 2-in 12-in15-in18-in12-in48-in18-in15-in 15.96-in15-in 12-in 24-in 18-in 15-in42-in 12-in 12-inQ 10 =2 cfs Q10=8 cfsQ10=11cfsQ10=7 cfsQ 1 0 =1cfs Q10=5cfs Q 1 0 =5 c fs Q 1 0 =6 5 c fs Q10=75cfs Q 10 =1 cfsQ10=24cfsQ10=19cfsQ10=27cfs Q10=1cfs Q10=30cfs Q10=29cf sQ 10 =1 6 c f s Q10=7cfsQ10=3 cfsQ10=7cfsQ 1 0 =3cfsQ10=28cfsQ10=2cfsQ10 =8cfs Q 1 0 =1 0 6 c fs Q10=62cfsQ10=21cfs Q10=12 cfsQ10=4 cfsQ10=123 cfs Q10=70 cfsQ10=109 cfsQ10=23 cfs Q10=4 cfsQ10=49 cfsQ 10=2 4 cfsQ10=7cfsQ10=104 cfsQ 10=54 cfs Q10=9cfs Q10=75 cfsQ10=35 cfsQ10=85 cfs Q 10 = 5 4 cfsQ10=24 cfs Q10=12 cfs Q10=2cf sQ10=12 cfs Q 1 0 =3 7 c f s Q 10=26 4 cfsQ 1 0 = 9 6 cfs Q10=17 cfs Q 1 0 = 3 cfs Q10=38 cfs Q10=1 cfs Q10=25 cfs Q10=1 cfs Q 1 0 = 2 1 cfs Q 1 0 = 7 cfs Q10=72 cfsQ10=70 cfsQ10=113 cfsQ10=230 cfsQ10=55 cfsQ 10=34 cfs Q10=14 cfs Q10=27 cfs Q10=106 cfs Q 10=16 cfsQ10=8 cfs Q10=12cfs Qover=15cfsQover=3cfsQover=11 cfs Qover=10cfs Qover=22cfsQover=30cfs LL-P20488.7 Ac LL-08715.1 Ac LL-08612.4 AcLL-0834.3 Ac LL-P278.9 Ac LL-08917.0 Ac LL-26720.8 Ac LL-19968.4 Ac LL-P195.8 Ac LL-1542.2 Ac LL-P21103.6 Ac LL-2703.6 Ac LL-26916.6 Ac LL-30512.7 Ac LL-3071.9 Ac LL-0909.6 Ac LL-26512.1 Ac LL-09116.7 Ac LL-20013.6 Ac LL-P0619.4 Ac LL-P2916.9 Ac LL-27226.8 Ac LL-0453.7 Ac LL-0742.0 Ac LL-0760.7 Ac LL-2094.9 Ac LL-23173.3 Ac LL-2361.8 Ac LL-2415.2 Ac LL-2446.7 Ac LL-0675.8 Ac LL-07 11.4 A c LL-2340.8 Ac LL-2204.6 Ac LL-01 43.2 A c LL-1803.7 Ac LL-1711.6 Ac LL-P167.1 Ac LL-10113.5 Ac LL-0577.1 AcLL-0534.9 Ac LL-1225.0 Ac LL-1252.6 Ac LL-1192.1 Ac LL-1133.0 Ac LL-1105.9 Ac LL-0927.0 Ac LL-1025.7 Ac SB-32123.4 Ac LL-P3120.8 Ac LL-27433.5 Ac LL-06414.0 Ac LL-0808.5 Ac LL-07816.9 Ac LL-1773.3 Ac LL-1603.3 Ac LL-1784.7 Ac LL-P2810.4 Ac LL-08217.8 Ac LL-19111.5 Ac LL-2963.2 Ac LL-2958.1 Ac LL-19612.1 Ac LL-1949.2 Ac TL-3044.6 Ac TL-3156.5 Ac LC-034206.6 Ac LC-011184.0 Ac LC-0908.8 Ac LC-017100.5 Ac LC-P1115.7 Ac LC-00624.6 Ac LC-00340.1 Ac TL-P5111.4 Ac TL-1699.6 Ac TL-17 12.9 Ac TL-1792.6 Ac TL-1800.9 Ac TL-2984.7 Ac TL-1831.9 Ac TL-1841.3 Ac TL-1923.7 Ac TL-1786.4 Ac TL-P0995.8 AcFR-08817.6 Ac PC-11731.3 Ac LL-06 92.1 A c LL-0701.4 Ac LL-0433.6 Ac LL-1763.3 Ac LL-17 21.5 A c FR-0831.9 Ac LL-O-04 LL-O-05 TL-O-01 LL-O-07 TL-O-02 LL-O-06 Q o v e r = 4 1 cfs Qover=9 cfs Qover=3 cfsQover=30 cfsQover=37 cfsQ o v e r=1 4 c fs Q o v e r = 4 2 cfs Qover=1 cfsQover=15 cfsQover=15 cfsQover=12 cfs Qover=43 cfsQover=80 cfs Qover=18 cfs Qover=23 cfs Qover=6 cfs Q over=11 cfsQover=60 cfs Qover=2 cfs Qover=6 cfs15-in12-in 36-in12-in12-in 12-in 30-in 15-in 24-in12-in3 0 -in12-in 15-in 12-in 30-in18-in15-in12-in18-in 12-in 12-in18-in 21.96-in 12-in30-in36-in27-in 15.96-in1 2 -i n 18-in18-in 12-in12-in18-in12-in15-in1 2 -in 18-in 15-in12-in 27-in12-in 24-in15-in12-in15-in24-in 24-in12-in36-in15-in12-in 12-in 1 2 -i n 30-in 1 2 -in 15-in 72-in1 8 -in 30-in 12-in 18-in12-in 27-in36-in18-in30-in 36-in15-in48-in 15-in 30-in18-in36-in12-in48-in 12-in36-in12-in 12-in 30-in 1 8 -in 48-in 12-in 18-in18-in 18- i n24-in18-in 30-in 60-in 1 2 -i n 30-in 1 8 -i n30-in42-in24-in 48-in18-in24-in 12-in1 5 -in 54-in1 5 -i n 12-in 60-in12-in42-in12-in54-in15-in 36-in 18-in 24-in21-in D i c k e y 'sLake 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, A2 A3 A4 C3 B2 C2 B4 C4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I B3 Page 8 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R "/"/"/"/ "/ "/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 !5 %9 %9 )n 1010 990 970 960 102010101000 980 970 100 09 9 09 8 0 9 7 0 9 6 0950 10101000 9809701 0 1 01000 990 960 1000 980 960 990 970 980960990980950990980 970960980 970990 980 970 960 970960970960 97095010101000970960960950960 9509 5 0 990 950 9 9 0 980 9 7 0 9501010 950 98098010001000 9 9 0 9709 5 0 950 1020100010001 0 0 0 990 10009901000 1000 9909 9 0 9 9 0990980 990 9 8 0 9 8 0 980970 9 8 0 9 8 0980 980 970970 970 9 7 0970970970 970960 960960960960 950 950950 950 950 9 5 0 9 5 0 9 9 0 970 950 950WA Y Z A T A B L V D WD A KOTA AVE WestFarm R d OLD LONG LAKE RD BROWNRDN SPRINGHILLRD USHWYNO12 EASTLONG L A K E R D LongLakeBlvd LL-P31 LL-P32 LL-P35 LL-P36 LL-P37 LL-P41 LL-P51 LL-P55 TL-P01 TL-P05 TL-P17 TL-P20 18-in Q10=51cf sQ10=199cfsQ10=5cfs Q10=14cf sQ10=20cfsQ10=41cfsQ10=5 cfs Q10=156 cfs Q10=4 c f s Q10=16 cfs Q10=123 cfs Q1 0 = 9 6 cf s Q10=42cfsQ10=4 cfsQ10=19 cfsQ10=13 cfsQ10=152 cfs Q10=24 cfsQ10=71 cfsQ10=27 cfsQ10=154 cfs Q10=264 cfsQ10=65 cfsQ 10=142 cfs Q 10=78 cfs Q10=188 cfs Q10=17 cfsQover=9cfs LL-P20488.7 Ac LL-19968.4 Ac LL-P 5061.5 Ac LL-P4939.4 Ac LL-P5124.7 Ac TL-P0545.3 Ac SB-32123.4 Ac LL-P3120.8 Ac LL-P0 57.8 Ac LL-P559.6 Ac LL-P418.9 Ac LL-14113.8 Ac TL-P2037.7 Ac TL-0472.1 Ac LL-27433.5 Ac LL-2146.3 Ac LL-0311.7 AcLL-P304.1 Ac LL-P322.9 Ac LL-3231.8 Ac LL-0324.3 Ac LL-33915.2 Ac LL-P3742.9 Ac LL-3256.3 Ac LL-06414.0 Ac TL-3063.5 AcTL-P1717.8 Ac TL-21215.8 AcTL-P1810.9 Ac TL-P018.3 Ac TL-P11115.6 Ac LL-O-08Qover=12 cfsQover=31 cfs Qover=6 cfs 24-in15-in24- i n24-in15-in48-in 24-in15-in48-in 24-in48-in72-in24-in24-in 60-in 36-in36-in27-in36-in27-in24-in72-in29.04-in27-in 15-in 24-in L o n g L a k e 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, A3 A4 A5 C4 B3 C3 B5 C5 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I B4 Page 9 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GeWX 1020101010009909701 0 6 0105 0 1 0 4 0 1040 1030102010101000990980970 1020 990 980 9 7 0 1000 960 950 1040 102010101000990 10009901 0 1 0 1 0 0 0990 980 1000990 980 1050104010101000 990 9 8 0 9909 8 0 102010101010100010009901000990980 970 9 9 0 9 7 0 98 0 970970 960980970980970960 980 97010301 0 2 0 102010101000990 980970980 970 980 9 7 0980 970 9 8 0970 9809701030980 1 0 1 0 10501030102010101 0 6 0 1 0 5 0 9 9 0990980980 9809609609 6 0103010401040 1 0 4 0 104010301030 1020 1 0 0 0 101 0 1010 101010101 0 1 0 10101010990 100010001 0 0 0 1000 1000 9 8 0 990 9 9 0 990 990990 980980 980970980 980 970980 980980970 970970 9 7 0 960970 9609 6 0 960960 950 970 9 7 0 960 PrairieViewLnRuannRdSIXTHAVEN L U CE LINE TR Hollander Rd OLDLONGLAKERD SPRINGHILLRDFERNDALE RD NWakefieldRdCHEVYCHASEDRHA-P01 LL-P07 LL-P09 LL-P10LL-P12 LL-P13 LL-P14 LL-P15 LL-P41 LL-P42 LL-P48 LL-P49 LL-P50 LL-P52 MO-P05 PL-P03 PL-P04 PL-P05 PL-P08 PL-P09 PL-P65 12-in 12-in 12-in 12-in 12-in1 2 -in 24-in 1 2 -i n 24-in 15-in12-inQ1 0=22c f s Q10=2cfs Q 1 0 = 3 cfs Q10=16cfsQ10=32 cfsQ10=3 cfsQ10=7cfsQ10=33 cfsQ10=16 cfs Q10=9cfsQ10=1cfsQ10=3 cfsQ10=21 cfsQ10=65 cfsQ10=28 cfsQ10=37 cfs Q 10=3 cfsQ1 0 = 4 1 c f s Q10=33 cfs Q10=27 cfs Q10=7 cfs Q10=51 cfs Q10=20 cf sQ10=22 cfsQ 1 0 = 3 2 cfs Q10=3 cfs Q10=35 cfs Qover=1 cfsQover=13 cfsQover=9 cfsVOID415.1 Ac MO-1567.5 Ac HA-0031.4 Ac VOID7.7 Ac MO-P054.4 Ac MO-P036.5 Ac MO-P0424.5 Ac LL-P20488.7 Ac LL-P1520.1 Ac LL-P1417.2 Ac LL-0176.0 Ac LL-P123.3 Ac LL-P109.4 Ac LL-P0922.1 Ac LL-P134.9 Ac LL-P5226.5 Ac LL-P5061.5 Ac LL-P4939.4 Ac LL-P5124.7 Ac LL-00912.3 Ac LL-P5498.2 Ac LL-P6017.5 Ac LL-P112.2 Ac LL-14526.6 Ac LL-3547.5 Ac LL-P0747.7 Ac LL-P424.7 Ac LL-P418.9 Ac LL-14113.8 Ac LL-P4015.3 Ac LL-P4812.2 Ac HA-0220.7 Ac HA-0102.3 Ac HA-00119.7 Ac HA-P0126.4 Ac HA-0537.5 Ac HA-0544.2 Ac HA-0396.4 Ac HA-0241.1 Ac PL-16687.3 Ac PL-P1116.2 Ac PL-06313.0 Ac PL-P0936.9 Ac PL-P6527.4 Ac PL-P033.0 Ac PL-P046.8 Ac PL-P0529.8 Ac PL-P0810.0 Ac PL-P0624.0 Ac HA-0020.8 Ac LL-P5311.5 Ac HA-O-01 HA-O-02 LL-O-10 LL-O-09 HA-O-03 12-in 12-in 12-in12-in24-in 12-in 2 4 -i n 12-in12 - i n24-in18-in12-in 1 2 -in 12-in 1 2-in 12-in 12-in 60-in 12-in 12-in24-in 36-in 12-in24-in4 8 -in 12-in12-in24-in12-in24-in24-in12-i n24-in 12-in 24-in24-in12-in15-in24-in18-in24-in24-in24-in24-in18-in36-inQover=10 cfsQover=22 cfs Qover=20 cf sH a d l e yLake L o n gLake L y d i a r dLake 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, A4 A5 C5 B4 C4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I B5 Page 10 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9 !5 %9 %9 %9 GÞWX GsWX 103010201 0 1 0 1 0 0 0990 9809609 5 0 9 4 0 990 98 09 7 09 6 0 9 9 0 9 6 0 95 0 9 7 0 960 9509 4 0 10101000990102010109 9 0 9 9 0 980 9 7 0 1 0 0 0 99 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 3 01020 9809 7 0 990980990980 1 0 0 0 99 0 970960950 970 960 97096095010401 0 3 01000 990 10101 0 0 0 9 90 980 970970960 960950950 940 9409309 5 0940 950 940 990980970 980 970 9409301040970940970 1000 9601020100099010009 7010201010980980 960 9301040104010401030 103010301030 103010101020 1 0 2 0 1010 10109909901000 10001 0 0 010001000 9809 9 0 980980980 970970 970970970 960960950950 950950 940 9 3 0 930930930 930 9 3 0 930 930 CristoforiCirS t A ndrewsSt BAYSIDE RD Westlake StELM STBaysideTrlMCCULLEY RDCO RD NO 19NORTH ARM DR W N O RTH A R M D R TONKAWA RDPARKLALuceLineRidgeNORTHARMLAAugustaStLakeviewPkwy FL-P01 FL-P02 NA-P02 NA-P05 NA-P07 SB-P06 SB-P07 SB-P09 SB-P20 15-in12-in 36-in12-in12-in24-in 12-in Q10=3cf sQ10=427cfs Q10=17cfsQ10=67cfs Q10=4cfs Q10=56cfs Q10=12cfs Q10=5 cfs Q10=22cfs Q10=2 cfsQ10=23cfsQ10=19 cfsQ10=46 cfsQ10=2 cfs Q 10=30 cfsQ10=27 c f s Q 10 =4 9cfs Q10=3 cfsQ10=30 cfs Q 10 = 1 2 cfs Q 1 0 =1 2 c f s Q10=33 cfs Q 1 0 =2 1 c fsQ10=72 cfsQ10=8cfsQ10=4 cfsQ10=70 cfsQ10=28 cfs Q 10=7 cfs Q10=48 cfs Q10=14 cfsQ10=18cfs Q 1 0 =5 0 c f s Q10=33 cfsQ 1 0 =2 8 c f s Q10=54 cfs Q 1 0 =1 8 c fs Q 1 0 = 6 4 cfs Q10=70 cfs Q10 =2 4 cfs Q10=110 cfsQ 1 0 =4 cfsQ10=2 cfsQ10=446 cfsQ10=72 cfsQ10=2 cfsQ10=8 cfs Q10=107 cfs Q10=1 cfs Q 1 0 =5 c f s Q 10 = 1 3 cfs Q10=293 cfsQ10=113 cfs Qover=11 cfsQover=4 cfs SB-075279.8 Ac SB-P203.9 Ac SB-P0415.1 Ac SB-0215.7 Ac SB-10639.9 Ac SB-P074.5 Ac SB-01122.3 Ac SB-00423.9 Ac SB-020157.3 Ac SB-P064.7 Ac SB-0327.6 Ac SB-P098.6 Ac SB-0272.5 Ac SB-0076.6 Ac SB-0332.4 Ac SB-0351.0 Ac FL-00114.5 Ac FL-P0124.2 Ac FL-0045.7 Ac FL-P07316.2 Ac FL-0323.7 Ac FL-0994.7 Ac FL-00623.0 Ac FL-04115.0 Ac FL-P0226.3 Ac FL-P0328.7 AcFL-0167.9 Ac FL-00813.9 Ac FL-0121.3 AcFL-0142.1 Ac FL-P043.0 Ac FL-0173.1 Ac PC-0295.3 Ac PC-07647.6 Ac PC-0666.1 Ac PC-0586.4 Ac PC-0565.1 AcPC-0255.4 Ac PC-0600.9 Ac PC-1073.8 Ac PC-P2064.4 Ac NA-065469.1 Ac NA-0703.2 Ac NA-06837.3 Ac NA-P026.1 Ac NA-P0714.5 Ac NA-06267.3 Ac NA-06775.4 Ac NA-0441.2 Ac NA-0423.3 Ac NA-0432.0 Ac NA-P0510.6 Ac NA-0451.6 Ac NA-0531.6 Ac NA-0471.1 Ac NA-0501.6 Ac NA-0570.8 Ac NA-0593.7 Ac NA-0565.1 Ac NA-0731.0 Ac NA -P0 12.2 A c NA-O-01 NA-O-02 PC-O-13 Qover=2 cfsQover=11 cfsQover=36 cfsQover=8 cfs Q o v e r = 1 3 cfsQover=3 cfsQover=24 cfs Q ov er=15 cfs Qover=20 cfs Qover=2 cfs Qover=31 cfsQover=22 cfsQ over=11 cfsQover=15 cfs Qover=19 cfs Qo v e r = 1 c f s Q o v e r=2 3 c fs 2 4 -in 15-in1 8 -in 12-in15-i n12-in 18-in2 4 -in15-in15-in15-in 30-in1 8 -in 15-in 15-in 24-in1 8 -i n 12-in 1 2 -i n 12-in24-in1 2 -in 12-in24-in 24-in 1 8-in 15-in18-in 24-in 18-in 18-in 15-in18-in1 8 -i n 24-in 15-in24-in24-in24-in 24-in 1 8 -i n 24-in 6-inS t u b b sBay N o r t h A r m 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B1 B2 D1 C2 D2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I C1 Page 11 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RR RRR R "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ !*" !*" %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9%9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GÞWX GÞWX GÞWX 1040 1030 1020 970 1 0 5 0 10109 9 0 960 950 940 1040103010201010100010201010100099010009901010 980 990 980 970 9 5 0 94 0 930 9 5 09401010 10001 0 1 010001000990 980 970 980 970 9 6 0 950 950 940 1000990980 9 7 0 980 970960950980940 9909809709609 4 0 990970 9609 6 0 9501020 102010101000 10001 0 0 0 9 9 0 990 990990 9 9 0 9 9 0 990 980 9 7 0 9 8 09809809809 8 0 980 9 8 0 970970 960 96096096093 0 9 3 0 940930 9309 7 0 BAYSIDE RD EILEEN ST Wear LaEastlake St SussexLaLillian L n BEDERWOODDRFox St RidgewoodCir Somerset La Christine Dr TONKA AVEKintyreLa WEARLANCRESTVIEW AVEHIGHLA CrystalCreekRdWATERTOWNRD STUBBS BAY RD SLUCE LINE TR CYGNETPLSussex Rd OxfordRdGr a h a mHillRdLEAF STFR-P20 LC-P07 LC-P09 LC-P10 LC-P11 LC-P12 LC-P13 LC-P14 LC-P15 LC-P17 LC-P18 LC-P19 LC-P20 LL-P61 MB-P01 MB-P02 SB-P05 SB-P10SB-P12 SB-P13 SB-P14 SB-P15 SB-P17 SB-P19 15-in12-in12-in 12-in12-in1 2 -in 1 5-in 18-in15-in24-inQ10=7 cfs Q10=32cfsQ10=62 cfsQ10=56cfsQ10=32 cfsQ10=28cfsQ10=54cfsQ10=174cfsQ 1 0 =7cfs Q10=11cfs Q10=69cfsQ 10=3 cfsQ10=131 cfsQ10=4 cfs Q10=9 cfsQ10=427 cfs Q10=44cfsQ10=12cfsQ10=29cfsQ10=6 cfs Q10=446cfs Q 1 0 =1 1cfs Q10=6 cfs Q10=6cfs Q10=117 cfs Q 10=43 cfsQ10=42 cfsQ10=16 cfs Q 1 0 =4 cfs Q 1 0 =2 0 c fs Q10=9cfsQ10=7 cfsQ10=25 cfs Q 1 0=16 0 cfsQ10=21 cf sQ10=131 cfsQ10=14 cfsQ 1 0 =1 1 0 cfsQ10=24 cfsQ10=40 cfsQ 10=20 cfsQ10=21 cfsQ10=39 cfsQ10=298 cfsQ10=257 cfsQ10=51 cfsQ1 0 = 1 1 cfs Q10=7 cfsQ10=5 cfsQ1 0 = 7 c f s Q10=15 cfs Q10=7 cfs Q10=119 cfsQ10=130 cfsQ10=90 cf sQ 1 0 =8 1 cfsQ10=49 cfs Q10=28 cfs Q 1 0 =1 6 c fs Q10=122cfs Q10=12 cfs Q 10=8 cfsQover=22 cfsQover=3cfsQover=16cfs Qover=2cfsQover=22 cfsQover=7 cfsQ o v e r = 1 3 cfs Q over=26 cfs Qover=34cfs LC-034206.6 Ac LC-0268.4 Ac LC-0296.6 Ac LC-P0717.6 Ac LC-P1415.8 Ac LC-P199.1 Ac LC-P0916.9 Ac LC-0327.0 Ac LC-P176.5 Ac LC-P1115.7 Ac LC-0863.9 Ac LC-P109.8 Ac LC-0843.3 Ac LC -07 71.4 A c LC-P187.7 Ac LC-05711.2 Ac LC-0754.1 Ac LC-06113.7 Ac LC-0539.7 Ac LC-P136.7 Ac LC-04916.2 Ac LC-0716.4 Ac LC-0457.8 Ac LC-0731.3 Ac LC-P126.9 Ac LC-1105.1 Ac LC-03910.2 Ac LC-0363.0 Ac LC-10313.7 Ac LC-1051.5 Ac LC-0412.3 Ac LC-0439.3 Ac LC-0677.8 Ac LC-0695.7 Ac LC-P159.6 Ac LC-1084.9 AcSB-0891.6 Ac FR-P 278.9 Ac FR-P039.0 Ac FR-06421.6 Ac FR-P3415.1 Ac FR-P2011.5 Ac SB-2832.6 Ac SB-2845.9 Ac FR-02415.4 Ac FR-1063.1 Ac FR-P199.4 Ac FR-P305.0 Ac FR-P333.5 Ac SB-075279.8 Ac SB-P1914.5 Ac SB-P2121.3 Ac SB-P1217.2 Ac SB-10639.9 Ac SB-08110.2 Ac SB-02216.7 Ac SB-0535.7 Ac SB-P112.8 AcSB-P101.5 Ac SB-P139.9 Ac SB-05710.8 Ac SB-04917.8 Ac SB-0476.0 Ac SB-0511.4 A c SB-020157.3 Ac SB-0397.3 Ac SB-0411.6 Ac SB-0442.4 Ac SB-0351.0 Ac SB-0646.6 Ac SB-P158.6 Ac SB-P1410.3 Ac MB-P018.9 Ac MB-P029.4 Ac SB-0671.2 A c SB-0693.5 Ac SB-1044.6 Ac SB-0971.6 Ac SB-0823.8 Ac SB-O-05 SB-O-06 SB-O-08 SB-O-11 LC-O-10 SB-O-10 SB-O-09 SB-O-02 FR-O-01 SB-O-04 LC-O-08 LC-O-04 LC-O-09 LC-O-06 LC-O-05 Qover=9 cfsQ o v e r=1 6 c f s Qover=43 cfsQover=10 cfsQ o v e r =1 3 c f s Q over=70 cfsQover=58 cfs Qover=20 cfsQover=39 cfsQover=9 cfsQover=8 cfs Qover=27 cfsQover=7 cfsQover=4 cfsQover=29 cf sQover=106 cfsQover=2 cfsQover=20 cfs Qover=62 cfsQover=41 cfsQover=2 cfsQover=13 cfsQover=70 cfsQover=10 cfsQover=28 cfs Qo v e r = 3 2 c f s Qover=16 cfs Q o v e r =1 6 c fs Q o v e r=4 c fsQover=13 cfsQ over=4 cfs18-in18-in1 2 -in 1 2 -in 2 4 -i n12-in1 8 -in15-in15-in12-in12-in12-in 12-in12-in1 2 -i n 12-in 48-in21-in 12-in2 4 -in 12-in18-in 15-in12-in 15-in 15-in12-in12- i n15-in12-in12-in15-in48-in12-in 15-in18-in12-in12-in18-in36-in 36-in15-in24-in 12-in12-in 15-in24-in15-in15-in24-in36-in 15-in 12-in 4 8 -in 48-in12-in 18-in 15-in4 8- i n18-in15-in12-in 12-in 2 4 -in 15-in M i l l sPond S t u b b s B a y 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B1 B2 B3 D2 C1 D1 C3 D3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I C2 Page 12 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/ "/ !*" %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9 %9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 GÞWX 1030 10209 9 0 970 9 6 0 950 9401040 990 990980970 9709 6 0 9 5 0 950 940 990980970 101 0 1000 10009909809 7 0 9 7 0 960970960950970 960 9 5 09 40960 9 5 0 9509409309509 4 0102010101010100010101000 990 980 980970950 940 9409 3 0 9 4 0 930940930940930980103010101000 990 9 7 0 9 6 0 960970 9509609 4 0 960 930 9501030 10301030 1 0 3 0 103010201010 1010 10101000990 10001000 990 990 9909 9 0980990 980 980980 9809 8 0 970 980980980 9709809609 7 0 970970970 970 9709709709609609609609 6 0 960960 960 9609509409 5 0 9 4 0 9 5 09509 5 0950 9409 4 0 9409409 3 09 3 0 9 3 0 930 9309301030 9 9 0 930 BROWN RD SOlive r HillWATERTOWN RD L U C E L IN E T R D e e rR u n T r L i l l i an Ln DeerRunTr ESomersetLa L o n gview C irTruffula TrColin DrDevin LaWILLOW DR NThoroughbred La White Oak CirA b in g d onW ayWILLOWDRSOLD CRYSTAL BAY RD SC re e k Ridge PassGolden View DrFR-P02 FR-P03 FR-P04 FR-P05 FR-P06 FR-P07 FR-P08 FR-P09 FR-P10 FR-P19 FR-P23 FR-P26 FR-P27 FR-P28 FR-P29FR-P30 FR-P32 FR-P33 FR-P34 FR-P35 FR-P36 TL-P02 TL-P06 TL-P08 TL-P09 TL-P10 TL-P19 TL-P21 TL-P51 24-in24-i n15-in15-in18-in1 2 -in 15-in 1 2 -in 24-in 15-in 18-in 1 8 -i n Q10=79cfs Q10=11 cfsQ10=13cfs Q10=3cfsQ10=24 cfsQ10=7cfs Q10=7cfsQ10=30 cfsQ 1 0 =5 c fs Q 10 =1 cfs Q10=27cfsQ10=3 cf sQ 1 0 = 1 1 cfs Q10=14 cfs Q 1 0 =1 1cfs Q 1 0 = 1 0 cfs Q 1 0 = 9 cfs Q10 =8cfs Q10=65 cfsQ10=18cfsQ10=54cfsQ10=18cfs Q10=5 cfsQ10=27cfsQ10=14cfsQ10=10cfsQ10=43cfsQ 1 0 =2 8 c f s Q10=18cfs Q10 =9 c fs Q10=24 cfsQ10=27 cfsQ10=146cfs Q10=19 cfs Q10=54 cfsQ10=8cfsQ 10=21 cfsQ10=7 cfsQ10=34 cfsQ10=54cfs Q10=7 cfsQ10=59cfsQ10=46 cf sQ10=5 cfs Q10=54cfs Q10=20 cfs Q10=52 cfsQ10=18 cfsQ10=89 cf sQ10=7 cfsQ1 0 = 7 8 cf s Q10=20 cfsQ10=95 cfsQ10=67 cfs Q10=83 cfsQ10=35 cfs Q10=2 cfsQ10=75cfsQ10=90 cf sQ10=62 cfsQ10=143 cfsQ10=139 cfsQ10=21 cfsQ1 0 = 1 6 c f s Q10=31 cfsQ10=13 cfsQ10=41 cfsQ 1 0 = 1 7 cfs Q10=187 cfsQ10=35 cfsQ 10 =3 c f s Q10=119 cfsQ10=48 cfs Q10=121 c f sQov e r =3c f s Qover=21cfs Qover=13 cfs Qover=20 cfsQover=36 cfsQover=25 cfsQ o ve r=2 6 c fs LL-08715.1 Ac LL-26720.8 Ac LL-19968.4 Ac LL-30512.7 Ac LL-26512.1 Ac LC-P1415.8 Ac LC-P1115.7 Ac LC -08 63.9 A c LC-0843.3 Ac LC-0363.0 Ac TL-3013.6 Ac TL-P5111.4 Ac TL-1699.6 Ac TL-1951.9 Ac TL-1872.5 Ac TL-1712.9 AcTL-1792.6 Ac TL-2984.7 Ac TL-3005.0 Ac TL-19 23.7 A c TL-1786.4 Ac TL-17623.6 Ac TL-0226.8 Ac TL-P0995.8 Ac TL-P0416.7 Ac TL-P11115.6 Ac TL-P1261.1 Ac TL-0062.8 Ac TL-2197.2 Ac TL-2166.7 Ac TL-P0210.7 Ac TL-P0616.3 Ac TL-2227.4 Ac TL-2202.6 Ac TL-P19129.2 Ac TL-P2210.3 Ac TL-1994.5 Ac TL-0437.5 Ac TL-2022.5 Ac TL-2972.6 Ac TL-3030.9 Ac TL-1851.6 Ac TL-2182.1 Ac FR-P25121.5 Ac FR-0855.8 Ac FR-P278.9 Ac FR-08817.6 Ac FR -1181.9 Ac FR-P039.0 Ac FR-06421.6 Ac FR-P3415.1 Ac FR-02415.4 Ac FR-1063.1 Ac FR-P353.3 Ac FR-P199.4 Ac FR-P305.0 Ac FR-P296.8 Ac FR-P265.4 Ac FR-0506.5 Ac FR-P284.6 Ac FR-0564.4 Ac FR-0271.2 Ac FR-0105.6 Ac FR-P235.0 Ac FR-05210.0 Ac FR-0484.5 Ac FR-P077.8 AcFR-P0912.3 Ac FR-P3712.0 Ac FR-P023.7 Ac FR-0803.0 Ac FR-0139.4 Ac FR -03 04.3 A c FR-06614.4 Ac FR-01211.2 Ac FR-P0622.6 Ac FR-01121.0 Ac FR-P0819.3 Ac FR-1265.6 Ac FR-0680.8 Ac FR-1081.0 Ac FR-0291.1 Ac FR-P333.5 Ac FR-1007.7 AcFR-0471.3 Ac FR-09712.0 Ac FR-0925.3 Ac FR-0586.7 Ac FR-P053.5 Ac FR-0605.8 Ac FR-12316.7 Ac FR-0831.9 Ac FR-1241.4 Ac FR-O-06 FR-O-03 FR-O-02 TL-O-01 TL-O-02 FR-O-05FR-O-04 12-in 18-in12-in 12-in15-i n 15-i n21-in15-in12-in1 2 -in 12-in 12-in 18-in15-in18-in1 5 -i n15-in24-in12-in 15-in15-in18-in9.96-in 12-in12-in18-in1 8 -i n 24-in18-in12-in18-in15-in12-in15-in15-in12-in12-in15-in 1 5-in 18-in 12-in48-in 24-in18-in 14.04-in 2 4-in 12-i n3 6-in 24-in 24-in 15-in42-in 36-in24- i n2 4 -in 24-in12-in18-in1 8 -in 12-in24-in 18-in 15-i n 12-in 15-in36-in 8.004-in 24-in12-in60-in18-in12-in24-in15-in 12-in1 5 -i n Q o v e r =2 5 c f s Qover=40 cfsQover=6 cfs Qo v e r = 1 9 c f s Qover=43 cfsQo v e r = 8 c f s Qover=30 cfsQover=18 cfsQover=50 cfsQover=48 cfsQover=23 cfsQover=22 cfsQ over=5 cfsQover=4 cfsQover=92 cfs Qover=10 cfsQover=39 cfsQover=32 cfs Qover=29 cfsQover=13 cfs Qover=25 cfs Qover=54 cfs Qover=26 cfsQover=6 cfs0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B2 B3 B4 D3 C2 D2 C4 D4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I C3 Page 13 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R"/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ !*" %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 )n GoWX102010101000990980 970960102010009909701030 1010 980 1 0 0 09909809601010 1 0 0 0 990 980 970 960 9 7 0 9609 5 0 9 4 0 10009909 6 0 9 5 0 10009 9 0 9 7 0960 990 9 8 0 9609909809701000 970 9 6 0 101010009 9 0990970 980970970960980960970960950980970960 9709609509 7 0960 9 6 0 950 960 9409609509 4 010101000 990980 1000 9 9 0 1000 9 9 0 990970 970960 980970980970 980970960970960 9 6 0 9 5 0 9709509 6 0 950 960 950950940950 940 9 6 09 50990 980 9 9 0980 970960970 960 9 5 094 0950 9 4 0 9 4 0 9 3 0 1 0 3 0 9 9 0 97010101000 950990 9809509809701 0 0 0970 9 9 0 970 980 970 960970960 9 6 0 9 5 0 95096 0 1010 1000990 9909 9 0 9 9 0 990980990 990 990 9 9 0 990 9 9 0990 990 9 9 0 980980980990 980980980 9 8 0 9 8 0 970 9809809 8 0980 980980980980 980980 980980980 9709 7 0 960 9 6 0 9709709 7 0 970 9 7 0 970 970 9 6 0 960950 960960950950940940 9409309 9 0 970 940940940940 LU C E LIN E T R S h o r e lin e D r KEENE AVEEdgewoodHillsR d USHWYNO12 WOODHILL AVE LY M A N A V E DICKENSON ST O ro n o O a ks D rWoodhillRdS MITH AVE ORONO ORCHARD RD SBB-P01 BB-P02 BB-P03 BB-P04 BB-P05 BB-P06BB-P07 BB-P08 BB-P09 BB-P10 BB-P11 BB-P12 BB-P13 BB-P17 TL-P04 TL-P11 TL-P12 TL-P13 TL-P14 TL-P15 TL-P16 TL-P17 TL-P18 TL-P31 TL-P32 TL-P33 TL-P34 TL-P35 TL-P37 TL-P38 TL-P3936-in24-in3 0 -in 1 2 -inQ1 0 = 1 0 cfs Q 1 0 =8cf sQ10=16cfsQ 10=11 cfsQ 1 0 =9 c fs Q10=66 cfs Q10=9 cfsQ10=6 cfs Q 1 0 =4cfs Q10=1 cfsQ10=3 cfsQ10=42 cfsQ 10 = 9 7 cfs Q10=139 cfs Q10=6 cfsQ 1 0 =1 2 c fs Q10=4 cfs Q10=10 cfsQ10=2 cfsQ10=71 cfsQ10=17 cfsQ1 0 = 7 c fs Q10=68 c f s Q10=60 cfs Q10=6 cfsQ10=49 cfsQov e r =3c f s Qover=32 cfsLL-19968.4 Ac LL-P4939.4 Ac TL-P0545.3 Ac TL-P2037.7 Ac TL-3063.5 Ac TL-P3917.1 Ac TL-P1413.5 Ac TL-P1614.1 Ac TL-P1515.0 Ac TL-P1315.3 Ac TL-P1717.8 AcTL-21215.8 Ac TL-P1810.9 Ac TL-P3822.5 Ac TL-P0416.7 Ac TL-P11115.6 Ac TL-P376.7 Ac TL-P3612.5 Ac TL-P354.5 Ac TL-P3416.8 Ac TL-05617.3 Ac TL-0607.7 Ac TL-P3315.6 Ac TL-25041.5 Ac TL-P3124.2 Ac TL-P3215.8 Ac TL-P1261.1 AcTL-2197.2 Ac TL-P0210.7 Ac TL-P0616.3 Ac TL-P2210.3 Ac TL-0042.5 Ac TL-0363.7 Ac TL-2531.7 Ac TL-2558.8 Ac TL-2022.5 Ac TL-2182.1 Ac BB-P0667.0 Ac BB-P117.5 Ac BB-P128.2 Ac BB-P1336.0 Ac BB-P0810.9 Ac BB-P0923.1 Ac BB-P1016.1 Ac BB-P0318.4 Ac BB-P171.7 Ac BB-P0721.2 Ac BB-P057.9 Ac BB-P0223.0 Ac BB-P0113.9 Ac BB-00128.0 Ac VOID8.7 Ac BB-P0416.5 Ac BB-0166.4 Ac BB-0176.4 Ac TL-0241.3 Ac TL-O-03 Qover=2 cfs Qover=55 cfsQover=26 cfsQ o v e r =2 8 c fsQover=11 cf s1 5 -in 24-i n24-i n 12-in15-in12-in 1 8 -i n18-in12-in 1 2 -in24- i n12-in1 2 -i n 1 8 -in24-in21-in24-i n30-in 2 4 -in 12-in1 2-in48-in48-in24-in 15-in15-in12-in24- i n9.996-in36-in36-in9.996-inF e r n d a l e M a r s h 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B3 B4 B5 D4 C3 D3 C5 D5 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I C4 Page 14 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R RR R R R R R R R R R "/"/"/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 !5 )n GoWX )n 102010009709601030 1010 990 101010009909809709609509401 0 0 0 9 9 098 09 7 0 9 6 0 95 0 9 7 0960 9 4 0 1000 9 8 0 960990980970 10009909809709 7 0 9609 4 09609509809509409509409309 9 0 9809 7 0 9 9 0 9 7 0 980970 970960980 97 0 9 5 09 4 0 950940 9509409 9 0 980 9 8 0 9609 8 0 970 980970980970980970 980 960 980970980970970960950980 9 7 0 9 8 0 970 9 7 0 960970960 970 960 97 0 960 9709609709 6 0 960 950 960950960 950 950 940980 1 0 1 0 9 9 0 930 10009709409 6 0 980 950 9 8 0 930 1 0 1 0 99 0 960 980970960950950950 1 0 1 0 1000 1000100010009 8 0990970970980 9 8 0 980980980960960 9 6 0 970 97 0 970970 970 9 6 0 9 6 0 9 7 0 960960960 9 6 0 9609609609 6 0960960960 9 6 0 950960950950950950950 950 950 9 5 0 940950 9509 4 0 9301000 970 960 960960 9 5 0 940 940 940940 930L U C E L I N E T R WA Y Z A T A BLV D W S h o r e lin e D r O LD L O N G LA K E R DHerrickCir MYRTLEWOODRDBB-P19 PL-P01 PL-P02 PL-P06 PL-P07 PL-P08 PL-P10 12-in18-in 18-in Q 1 0 = 3 cfs Q10=2 cfsQ10=3 cfsQ 1 0 =1 2 c f s Q10=26 cfsQ over=9 cfsQover=2 cfs Qover=2cfsQover=20cfsLL-P5061.5 AcLL-P4939.4 Ac TL-P2037.7 Ac HA-P022.3 Ac HA-0537.5 Ac HA-0544.2 Ac HA-0396.4 Ac PL-16687.3 Ac PL-P0810.0 Ac PL-P0710.3 Ac PL-P0113.2 Ac PL-P0624.0 Ac PL-P1035.4 Ac PL-00313.4 Ac BB-P0667.0 Ac BB-P1925.9 Ac BB-P0223.0 Ac BB-P0113.9 Ac BB-00128.0 Ac VOID8.7 Ac BB-0537.0 Ac Ferndal eMarsh Qover=1 cfsQover=13 cfsQover=1 cfs12-in 12-in12 - i n12-in12-in12-in12-in12-in18-in18- i n12-i n15-in18-in36-in18-in 60-in36-in42-in18-in12-in15-in15-in36-in 24-in36-inL a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B4 B5 D5 C4 D4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I C5 Page 15 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R R "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ %9 %9%9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GsWX GsWX GsWX1030102010101000990 9809509401 0 0 0 9 9 0 980 970 950 990 980 960 950 9809609509409809 7 0 960940990 980 970 960950 970960950 10009909809809709 6 095 09401040 1030 1000990990970970960950940 980 9 7 0 980970980970970 960 9 6 095 0 9 5 0 9 40940930970960930 10109401 0 0 0 9 30930 940990 990100 09809 8 0 95010401030 1 0 3 01020 9901 0 0 0 990 9909 9 0 9 9 0 970980 980 980980 980970 970970960 9609 6 0 940 950940940 930940 9409309 3 0930 930930930 970 9 3 0 No rth S horeDr N O RTH A R M D R GARDEN CTTONKAW A RD CO RD NO 19Lake view Ct WINDJAMMERLATonkaviewCt WEST BRANCH RD Dahl Rd LINDEN LA ForestLake Dr WildhurstTrElmwood Ave MIN NETO NKA H GL D LAPinehurstCtTONKAVIEWLA LakeviewPkwy Loma Linda Ave FL-P03 FL-P04 FL-P05 FL-P07 FL-P08 FL-P09 NA-P0615-in18-in12-in12-in24-in Q10=19cfsQ10=17cfsQ10=12cfsQ 10=9cfsQ10=17cfs Q 1 0 =1 1 c fs Q 1 0 =4 cfsQ 1 0 =1 1cfs Q 1 0 = 1 5 cfs Q10=5 cfs Q10=2 cfsQ10=81 cfs Q10=36cfsQ10=2 cfsQ10=32cfsQ10=38 cfs Q10=16 cfs Q10=39 cfsQ10=19 c f s Q10=38cfs Q 10=17 cfsQ10=16cfs Q10=72cfs Q10=27 cfs Q 10=8 cfsQ10 =2 3 c f s Q10=19 cfsQ10=10 cfsQ10=18 cf sQ10=8 cfsQ 1 0 =2 4 c f s Q10=60 cfs Q10=2 cfs Q10=57 cfs Q10=9 cfs Q10=58 cf sQ10=67 cfs Q10=67 cfsQ10=30 cf sQ 1 0 =3 c fs Q10=11 cfs Q 1 0 =5 2 c f sQover=17cf sQ over=7 cfsQover=30cfsQover=11cfsQover=11 cfsS B -0 7 5279.8 A c F L -09 0201.8 A c F L -P 07316.2 A c FL -0 3 23.7 A c F L -P 0226.3 A c F L -P 0328.7 A c F L -08 45.4 A c F L -08 626.4 A c F L -0 2 31.5 A c F L -01 87.3 A c F L -01 67.9 A c FL -0 0813.9 A c F L -02 84.5 A c F L -P 043.0 A c F L -03 93.6 A c F L -01 73.1 A c F L -02 53.6 A c F L -04 44.5 A c F L -08 218.9 A c F L -04 09.0 A c F L -P 0520.3 A c F L -P 0831.7 A c F L -P 0935.1 A c F L -09 29.4 A cFL-0 741.4 A c F L -07 51.9 A c F L -07 23.0 A c F L -1 0 21.0 Ac F L -07 836.1 A c F L -10 03.9 A c F L -05 95.6 A c F L -05 63.5 A c F L -05 33.5 A c F L -03 07.6 A c FL-0882.4 Ac F L -04 84.2 A c F L -09 54.9 A c WA -0 0 412.1 A c WA -0 0 93.1 A c WA -0 113.6 A c W A -01 52.6 A c N A -0 6 5469.1 A c N A -P 0 62.7 A c N A -0 4 23.3 A c N A -0 3 74.6 A c N A -P 0 510.6 A c N A -0 3 92.5 A c N A -0 8 05.3 A c N A -0 0 76.0 A c N A -0 114.0 A c N A -0 1 32.4 A cNA-0 0 93.5 A c N A -0 0 49.2 A c N A -0 5 65.1 A c F L -07 15.3 A c F L -0 9 82.6 A c F L -0 4 61.5 A c FL-O-03 NA-O-03 FL-O-02 WA-O-01 FL-O-0112-in18-i n2 4 -in 18-in 12-in1 2 -in18-in12-in15-in12-in12-in12-in 15-in12-in24-in24-i n12-in12-in 24-in 21-in15-in 21-in 18-in12-in24-in12-in15- i n12-in1 8-in 24-in24-in 24-in21-in 18-in 15-in12-in2 4 -i n 21-in 15-in 48-in 2 4 -i n 2 1 -in 24-in15-in21-in18-in 18-in18-in21-in 18-in24-in18-in15-in 1 8 -in 18-in15-in 15-inQ o v e r =6 c fsQover=8 cfsQover=6 cfs Qover=15 cfsQover=14 cfsQover=7 cfs Q over=19 cfs Qover=34 cfs Q o v e r =6 4 c f s Q o v e r =7 c f s Q o v e r=1 2 c fs Qover=8 cfsQ over=16 cfsQover=54 cfsQover=21 cfsQover=13 cfsQover=19 cfsQover=8 cfsQover=14 cfsF o r e s t L a k e S t u b b s B a y N o r t h A r m W e s t A r m 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, C1 C2 E1 D2 E2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I D1 Page 16 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R RR RRR "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 GÞWX G½WX 990 980 9 6 0 950 9409809609509 4 0 1 0 0 0 9909809709 8 0 970 9709609 5 0 9609509 4 0 9 9 0980 980 9 7 0 9509409 5 0940 970 960 9409301010 930 990 970 93 0 1 0 0 0 960940 9309909 8 0 9 8 0 980 9 8 0 970 9 7 0 970 9 6 0 9509 6 0 9 5 0 9 5 0 9 5 0 9409409409409409 4 0 9 4 0 9 4 0 9409 3 0 940930 9 3 0970930 T ONKAWARDFox St PartenwoodRdFARVIEW LAMB-P02 MB-P04 SB-P16SB-P17 SB-P18 12-inQ10=11 cfs Q10=5 cfsQ10=21 cfs Q10=4cfs Q10=54cfs Q10=12cf sQ 1 0 =6 c f s Q10=7 cfsQ 1 0 =2 6cfs Q10=2cfs Q1 0 = 6 c f s Q 1 0 = 1 2 cfs Q10=30 cfs Q 1 0 =7 c fs Q10=2 cfsQ10=4 cfsQ10=7 cfs Q 10=9 cfsQ10=49 cfsQover=22cfsFR-P199.4 Ac FR-P305.0 Ac FR -07 24.2 A c SB-075279.8 Ac SB-0723.6 AcSB-P187.0 Ac SB-0646.6 Ac SB-P162.5 Ac SB-P158.6 Ac SB-P1410.3 Ac SB-0761.1 Ac SB-0863.4 Ac CY-P039.2 Ac CY-P049.0 Ac NA-065469.1 Ac NA-P 062.7 Ac NA-0305.0 Ac NA-0341.7 Ac NA-0324.3 Ac MB-0102.4 Ac MB-016463.9 Ac MB-P018.9 Ac MB-P029.4 Ac MB-0217.4 Ac MB-0116.6 Ac MB-0066.0 Ac MB-P033.6 Ac MB-03416.9 Ac MB-P0417.5 Ac MB-P0617.3 Ac MB-0372.4 AcMB-0172.5 Ac SB-O-04 MB-O-01 Q o v e r =2 c f s Q o v e r =2 4 c f s Qover=18 cfsQover=1 cfsQover=15 cfs Qover=16 cfsQ o v e r=1 6 c fs12-in 1 2 -i n 24-in15-in15-in12-in15-in15-in15-in12-in 12-in1 5-in 1 2 -in 15-in18-in 15-in12-inS t u b b s B a y M a x w e l l B a y N o r t h A r m L a k eMinn e t o n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, C1 C2 C3 E2 D1 E1 D3 E3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I D2 Page 17 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ !*" %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 GÞWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX990970960950960950 940 97096095096 0 950 940960950970 960 950 95 0 9 4 0 9 3 0 9 6 0 95094097 0 960 9 4 0 93 0 9509 4 0 950 940 950 93 0 9509 4 0 9 5 0 94 0 950 930 950940960950950940 950940950940950940950940940 930 10009 8 0 930 9809 7 0 960 9509609309 3 09609 7 0 950950 9 5 0 950950 950950980 970970 9509 6 0 9 6 0 960960 960 94 0 95095095 0 9509 5 0 9 5 0 9509 5 0 9509509409509 4 0 940 930940940940930940 9 4 0 940940940940930 9 3 0 9309 3 0 9309309309309 3 0 930930930 930 9309 3 0930960940 930 930 9 3 0 BROWN RD SFrenchCreekDrFrenc h CreekCir CarriageLaGander RdARBOR STLAKEVIEW AVE W IL L O W D R S Lit t l eOrchard W ayFARVIEW LA MINNETONKA AVE Rainey Rd Fo x St H E R I T A G E D R NorthShoreDr F r e n c h L a k e R dOLD CRYSTAL BAY RD SBRIARSTSHEVLI NDRWEBBERHILLSRD CY-P03CY-P04 FR-P01 FR-P11 FR-P12 FR-P13 FR-P14 FR-P15 FR-P16 FR-P18 FR-P21 FR-P22 FR-P25 FR-P30 FR-P31 FR-P37 MB-P06 MB-P07 TL-P22 TL-P24 TL-P25 TL-P26 TL-P28 TL-P29 TL-P30 30-in 15-in18-inQ10=7cfsQ 1 0 =3 c fs Q10=7cfs Q10=806cfs Q 10=4 cfsQ10=89cfsQ10=5cfs Q10=11 cfsQ10=4cfsQ10=44cf sQ10=23 cfsQ10=2cfs Q10=23cfs Q10=2cfsQ10=17cfsQ10=4 cfsQ10=43 cfsQ10=32cfsQ10=26cfsQ10=188cfs Q 10 =1 c f sQ10=13 cfsQ 1 0 =2 8cfs Q10=16 cf sQ 1 0=3 7 cfsQ10=12 cf sQ1 0 = 1 8 7 cfs Q10=4 cfs Q10=54cfs Q10=96cf sQ10=4 cfs Q10=5 cfsQ10=50 cfsQ10=75cf sQ10=143 cfs Q10=250 cfs Q10=9 cfsQ10=42 cfsQ10=130 cf sQ10=20 cfsQ10=3 cfsQ10=9 cfsQ10=9 cfs Q10=1 cfsQ10=9 cfsQ10=9 cfsQ10=8 cfs Q 1 0 = 1 4 2 cfs Q10=41 cfsQ10=391 cf sQ 1 0 = 8 cfs Q 10=1 cfsQ10=7 cfs Q10=3 cfsQ10=57 cfs Q10=49 cfsQ10=1 cfsQ10=5 cfs Q10=14 cfs Q10=69 cfsQover=4cfsTL-P0616.3 A c T L -P 19129.2 A c T L -06 811.0 A c T L -23 82.3 A cTL-P 2514.0 A c T L -01 83.5 A c T L -23 944.1 A c T L -P 287.5 A c T L -P 307.0 A c TL -2 471.2 A c TL -2 4 82.1 A c T L -24 611.5 A c T L -P 2923.7 A c T L -P 2613.0 A c T L -03 15.4 A c T L -P 2210.3 A c T L -07 1114.0 A c T L -P 0 33.3 A c F R -P 2 5121.5 A c FR -P 1 99.4 A c F R -P3 05.0 A c F R-0724.2 A c F R -P2 96.8 A c F R -P3 712.0 A cFR-0803.0 A c F R-03319.5 A c F R -P1112.0 A c F R -P1 311.0 A c F R -P1 26.0 A c F R-0775.7 Ac F R -P 1 818.4 A c F R -P 2 210.6 A c F R -P 3 16.3 A c F R -P 2 4186.4 A c F R -P 1 516.8 A c FR-1140.7 Ac F R-0139.4 A c F R-0304.3 A c F R -P 0 622.6 A c F R-0021.5 A c F R-03815.9 A c F R-0045.5 A c F R-0423.6 A c F R-1213.7 A c F R -P0 12.8 A c F R-0174.3 A c F R-0465.6 A c F R -P 1 63.0 A c C Y-P 0 39.2 A c C Y-P 0 49.0 A c S B -2 5 84.8 A c S B -2 6 110.5 A c M B -0 1 6463.9 A c MB-P 029.4 A c M B -0 2 17.4 A c M B -0 191.2 A c M B-P0 73.4 Ac M B-P0 617.3 A c MB-0320.8 Ac M B -0 2 92.1 A c M B -0 2 73.7 A c F R-12316.7 A c F R-15620.4 A c F R-0372.2 A c TL-2 320.9 Ac TL -2 3 03.5 A c T L -24 23.8 A c T L -24 31.5 A c FR-O-08 FR-O-07 FR-O-0912-in24-in15-in1 8-i n1 2 -in28.8-in12-in48-in12-i n 12-in24- i n18-in1 2 -in 1 2 -i n15-in12-in18-in12-i n18-in 15-in 24-in48-in1 5 -in 18-in 24-in 15-in 15-in12-in18-in18-in15-in18-i n1 8 -i n 15-in15-in12-in 1 2 -i n 18-in 15-in 12-in12-in12-in12-in12-in15-in24-in 18-in36-in12-in15-in18-i n8.004-in 12- i n1 2 -in 12-in12- i n12-in 12-in 12-in 12-in Qover=39 cfsQover =120 c f s Qover=3 cfs Q o v e r =1 1 c fsQover=1 cfsQover=5 cfs Q o v er=9 cfs Qover=4 cfsQ over=3 cfs Q o v e r =1 c f sQover=13 cfsQover=14 cfsQover=46 cfsQover=20 cfsQ o v e r =1 2 c fsQover=25 cfsQover=5 cfs F r e n c h L a k e S m i t hBay M a x w e l lBay L a k e M i n n e t o n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, C2 C3 C4 E3 D2 E2 D4 E4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I D3 Page 18 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMRR R R R R R R R R R R R R "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GoWX GoWX 9 9 0980 9709 6 0 9 5 0 9 4 0 970 950 9 8 097 09609 7 0 9 6 0 9409 7 0960 950940960 950 930 980 970 960 960950 9 7 0960 940930950930 950 9409 5 09 4 0 940 930 9 5 0 9409609509509409409 3 0 940930 940 930 940930 9409301000 9509 5 0 950 950950950 9 5 0 960970970 9709 7 0 960 960960960 950 9 5 0 950950 940940 930930940 9409 4 0 9 3 0 9 3 0 930930 930 9409309309309309309 3 0930 93093093 0 930 93093093 0 940 940930 930 930 930 Fox St ORONOORCHARDRDSShoreline DrORONO LA FerndaleRdW Gr ee nTre e sRdMillston RdBracket t s Poi nt RdHERI TAGELABB-P10BB-P13 BB-P14 BB-P15 BB-P16 BB-P17 BB-P18 TL-P03 TL-P29 18-in12-inQ10=3 cfsQ10=2cf sQ10=18cfs Q10=26cfsQ10=17cfs Q10=9cfsQ10=8cfs Q10=41cfsQ 1 0 =2 7 9cfs Q10=21 cfsQ10=3 cfsQ 10=11 cfsQ10=12 cfsQ10=391 cf sQ1 0 = 1 5 c f s Q 1 0 =1 3 cfsQ10=39 cf sQ10=806 cfs TL-P2393.9 Ac TL-P3215.8 Ac TL-P0616.3 Ac TL-P287.5 Ac TL-P2923.7 Ac TL-P 2613.0 Ac TL-0315.4 Ac TL-P2210.3 Ac TL-0025.9 Ac TL-071114.0 Ac TL-P033.3 Ac SB-2569.6 Ac SB-10838.4 Ac SB-2573.7 AcSB-2584.8 Ac BB-P1423.3 AcBB-P154.6 Ac BB-0363.0 Ac BB-P188.6 Ac BB-P1336.0 Ac BB-P1016.1 Ac BB-0406.3 Ac VOID8.9 Ac BB-P165.9 Ac BB-P171.7 Ac BB-P0721.2 Ac BB-O-02 SM-O-01 SM-O-02 BB-O-01 Qover=14 cfs Qover=11 cfs 1 8 -i n 3 0 -in 15.96-in30-in 18-in15-in12-in 1 8 -i n 12-in12-in 24-in48-in 12-in 9.996-in 30-in F e r n d a l eMarsh T a n a g e r L a k e S m i t h B a y B r o w n s B a y L a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, C3 C4 C5 E4 D3 E3 D5 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I D4 Page 19 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PM%9%9 10009909809709609 7 0960950 95 0 9 4 0 9 5 0 940 970960960950 960950940 940 930 9409309 5 0 9 3 0970960 9509409 5 0 9 4 0 940 930 940930 940930950 930980930 9301010 9909909 8 0 970 970 9509 5 0 9 5 0960 960 9609409 4 0 930930 930940 930930930930 930 930B r o w n sBay F e r n d a l eMarsh P e a v e y L a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet S o u r c e : C i t y o f O r o n o , H e n n e p i n C o u n t y , M n D N R , M n D O T , C4 C5 D4 E4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I D5 Page 20 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R RR R "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GsWX GsWX GsWX 1000 970960950940 9 7 0 960950980960950940950940960 9 5 0960940960 9 5 0 9 4 0 9509409709609 5 0 940 980970 980970 970 960 940930940930930 9709309 6 0 980980970 960 930950980 980970970 960 970 9 6 0 960960960950950940 930North ShoreDr WEBB STHIGHWOOD LAMAPLE PLF A G E R N E S S P O INTRDVINE PLMINNIE AVECHERRYPLHIGHW OOD R DRestPointRd C H E R RY AVENORTHARMDRPARKDRRESTPOINTCIR CONCORDIA STFL-P06 WA-P01 15-in 12-in 12-in18-in12-in 15-in18-inQ10=29cfsQ10=12cfsQ10=369cfsQ10=5cfs Q10=33cfsQ10=5 cf sQ10=23 cfs Q10=7 cf sQ10=10c f sQ10=22 cfsQ 10=15 cfsQ10=370 cfsQ10=20cf sQ10=9 cfs Q 10=36cfsQover=17cfsQover=1cfsQover=6cfs FL-090201.8 Ac FL-0358.1 AcFL-0681.0 Ac WA-04030.1 Ac WA-02511.9 Ac WA-00412.1 Ac WA-0093.1 Ac WA-0113.6 Ac WA-0131.2 Ac WA-0152.6 Ac WA-0212.1 Ac WA-0182.6 Ac WA-P014.2 Ac WA-0292.4 Ac WA-0341.9 Ac WA-0362.0 Ac WA-0382.3 Ac NA-065469.1 Ac NA-P036.8 Ac NA-0191.0 Ac NA-0231.7 Ac NA-0226.3 Ac NA-0179.2 Ac NA-07813.0 Ac NA-0811.6 Ac NA-0805.3 Ac NA-0132.4 AcNA-0093.5 Ac WA-0201.1 Ac WA-0270.9 Ac NA-O-04 WA-O-04 WA-O-01 WA-O-02 Q over=7 cfsQover=4 cfsQover=6 cfs Q over= 1 8 cfs Qover=3 cfsQover=35 cfsQover=8 cfs Qover=9 cfs Qover =11 cf sQ over=16 cfs18-in12-in15-i n12-i n15-in36-in12-in 15-in36-in12-in 1 2-in 18-in36-in1 8-in12- i n12- i n15-in18-i n15-in18-in18-in18-inF o r e s t L a k eForest L a k e F o r e s tLake N o r t hArm W e s t A r m W e s t A r m W e s t A r m 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, D1 D2 F1 E2 F2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I E1 Page 21 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMRR R R "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GsWX G½WX GsWX G½WX G½WX 9609509 4 0 9709609 5 0 9 4 0 9 5 0 9 4 0 960 9 4 0 950940 9509409 5 0 9 4 0950940960 9 5 0 9409 3 0 940 9309409309709609609509 5 0 9 5 0 9 5 0 930 940 9409 4 0 9 4 0 930940940940940940930930930950 930 930 930 930 BIRCH LAN orthShoreDrB O H N S P O I N T L A FAGERNES S POINT RD BALDUR PARK RD Bohns Point RdCY-P02NA-P03 NA-P04 WA-P02 12-in 12-in 15-i n 15-in1 5 -i n 12-inQ10=2cfs Q 1 0 =3cfs Q 1 0 =1 6 c fsQ10=4cfsQ 10=1 cfs Q10=3cfs Q10=7cfs Q10=17 cfsQ10=6 cfsQ10=3 cfs Q 1 0 =7 c fs Q 1 0 =1 1 c f s Q10=23 cfsQov er =3cf s Qover=1cfsQover=1 cfsQover=7 cfsQover =7 cf sQover=1 cfs Qover=3 cfsQov er =3 cf sWA-04030.1 Ac WA-P0226.4 Ac WA-0453.0 Ac WA-0414.7 Ac CY-0091.3 Ac CY-0111.4 Ac CY-0231.8 Ac CY-0291.9 Ac CY-0322.7 Ac CY-0331.6 Ac CY-P026.7 Ac CY-0493.3 Ac CY-0026.1 Ac CY-0551.8 AcCY-0510.9 Ac NA-065469.1 Ac NA-P036.8 Ac NA-0231.7 Ac NA-0226.3 Ac MB-016463.9 Ac WA-0432.8 Ac CY-0271.7 Ac CY-0373.0 Ac CY-0415.0 Ac CY-O-05 NA-O-05 12-in 15-in12-in12-in12- i n18-in 15-in 12-in 15- i n12-in15-in 12-in 2 4 -in24-in1 5 -in 1 2-in15-in 1 2 -in 48-in 24-in15-in 24-in1 2 -in 12-in Qover=3 cfs Q over= 9 cfs Q o v e r=1 8 cfs Qover=7 cfsM a x w e l l B a y N o r t h A r m L a k eMinneto n k a C r y s t a l B a y W e s t A r m 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, D1 D2 D3 F2 E1 F1 E3 F3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I E2 Page 22 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R RR R R "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 G½WX GoWX GoWX G½WX 980960950940970 950 940970950940 950940970 960 9 6 0 950950940 970960970 960 9509409 4 0 9 3 0 97093096 0 9309309709509 5 0 9609509509709 7 0 970970970 9 7 0 9709609609509609 5 0950950 950 950 94093093 0 930 9609 30North Shore DrFrench CreekDr BROWN RD SARBOR STRAILROAD AVEBRIAR STSpates Ave Bay Ridge RdFR-P17 FR-P18FR-P22 SB-P22 18-in 1 2-in Q10=17cfs Q10=69cfsQ 10=37 cfsQover=5 cfs Qover=16 cfs TL-P287.5 AcTL-P307.0 Ac TL-24611.5 AcFR-P1818.4 AcFR-P2210.6 Ac FR-P174.1 Ac FR-P24186.4 Ac FR-03815.9 Ac FR-0465.6 Ac SB-26226.8 Ac CY-P049.0 Ac SB-26110.5 Ac SB-P2212.4 Ac VOID15.1 Ac SB-2596.2 Ac SM-O-04 SM-O-06 SM-O-07 1 2 -i n 48-in24-in 1 2 -i n 15-in12-in12-in 12-in 12-in Q o v er=9 cfs Qover=7 cfsQover=5 cfs S m i t h B a y L a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, D2 D3 D4 F3 E2 F2 E4 F4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I E3 Page 23 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PM"/%9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 950940950 950950Bracketts P oi n t Rd S m i t h B a y L a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, D3 D4 D5 F4 E3 F3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I E4 Page 24 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R "/ "/"/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/ G½WX GoWX GoWX970960950 9 8 0960950940 9509409709 5 0 940 9 6 0 950 9409309 6 0 950 9 5 0 9 4 0960 940 950 930 9509409509 4 0 9509309 4 0 9 30950940970 96 0 970960950 940950940940 930 9 7 0 940 940 9509309 4 0 9 5 0940 940 9 4 0 950950 950 9 5 0 930930940930930 940 S p r i n gParkBay W e s t A r m B l a c kLake B l a c k L a k e 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, E1 E2 G1 F2 G2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I F1 Page 25 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R R R RR R R R R R R "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/"/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/"/"/"/"/"/"/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/"/"/"/"/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GsWX GoWX GsWX GoWX 9 8 0 970 960 950 940 9 3 0 9 6 0 9 5 0 94 0 9709509609 4 0 9 6 0 9 4 0940930 9 5 0 9309609 5 0960940960950 9709 6 0 9 6 0 9 5 0 960 950 940 9 3 0 960930970960970970 9509 5 0 9609509 6 0 950 9509 3 0 9 3 0 970970970970960950 9509 6 0 960 960960960 960960960960 960 9609 6 0 9609 5 0 9 5 0 940 950950 9 5 0 950 9 4 0 940 940 940940930930940 9409309309309 3 0 930 9 3 0 SHADY W O O D R D Shoreline Dr ETHEL AVEFREDERICK S T CRYSTAL PL ShoreHills OLIVE AVE NAVARRE AVEBLAINE AVENAVARRELABAYVIEW PL LIVINGSTON AVE TOGO RD LYRIC AVE C R Y S TALBAYRDCascoPointRdKE N WO O D WA Y LYDIARD AVEPe n c e L a OLDBEACHRDN O R T H E R N A V E D U N W O O D Y A V E PHEASANTRDKELLY AVECARMAN STCB-P02 CB-P03 CB-P04 CB-P06 CB-P07CB-P08 CB-P09 CY-P01 LF-P01 LF-P02 LF-P03 WA-P02 12-in12-in12-i n12-in15-in 12-in12-in24-in18-in1 8 -in12-in15-in12-in12-in 1 8-in12-in12-in24-in1 8-in 12-in 12-in12-in 18-in 12-in 18-in Q10=9cfs Q 1 0 = 1 6 cfs Q10=27 cfsQ1 0 = 4 c f s Q10=6cfsQ10=7 cfsQ10=19cfsQ 1 0 =3 0cfsQ10=25cf sQ10=9cfsQ10=91cfsQ10=13cfsQ1 0 = 7 cfs Q10=16 cfsQ10=148cfsQ10=4cfs Q 1 0 =8 c f s Q10=4cfs Q10=28cfsQ10=14 cfs Q10=6cfs Q10=16 cfsQ10=26 cfsQ10=9c f s Q10=11cf sQ10=8 cfsQ10=22 cfsQ10=48 cfs Q10=43 cfs Q10=18 cfsQ 1 0 = 2 8 cfs Q 1 0=1 0 cfsQ10=5 cfsQ10=7 cfs Q10=244 cfsQ 1 0 = 3 8 cfs Q 10 =1 7 c f s Q10=31 cfsQ10=109cfsQ10=27 cfs Q10=47 cfsQover=5 cfsQover=11 cfsQover=1cfsQover=33cfsQover=36cfsQover=14cfs Qover=17cfs Qover=11cfsLF-02147.7 Ac CB-01324.9 Ac CY-P0130.7 Ac WA-P0226.4 Ac CB-0612.0 Ac CY-0226.6 Ac WA-0543.1 Ac WA-05319.0 Ac CB-13916.0 Ac CY-01814.4 Ac CB-0822.3 Ac CB-13 81.3 Ac CB-07 82.5 A c CB-0801.5 Ac CB-1312.9 Ac CB-1692.8 Ac CB-15 91.5 A c CB-1401.5 Ac CB-16112.6 Ac CB-1561.1 Ac CB-1471.0 Ac CB-0108.0 Ac CB-1432.9 Ac CB-14 43.1 A c CB-P0611.1 Ac CB-0851.2 Ac CB-12 91.3 A c CB-1341.0 Ac CB-0880.7 Ac CB-0922.1 Ac CB-1022.6 Ac CB-1251.2 Ac CB-10817.2 Ac CB-1052.2 Ac CB-10 94.2 A c CB-0632.9 Ac CB-1201.7 Ac CB-0692.8 Ac CB-07 52.0 A c CB-1111.3 Ac CB-1144.7 Ac CB-0651.8 Ac CB-07 47.5 Ac CB-2263.5 Ac CB-2221.6 Ac CB-2201.7 Ac CB-0061.1 AcCB-2131.6 Ac CB-P127.8 Ac CB-P095.7 Ac CB-1631.1 Ac CB-1755.2 Ac CB-1721.4 Ac CB-1731.9 Ac CB-1654.4 Ac CB-1675.0 Ac CB-2292.1 Ac CB-2317.2 Ac CB-1822.4 Ac LF-P015.4 Ac LF-0013.9 Ac VOID19.4 Ac LF-0044.0 Ac LF-0052.2 Ac LF-0073.9 Ac LF-0161.2 Ac LF-0108.9 Ac LF-0141.0 Ac LF-P0212.8 AcCB-0661.6 Ac LakeMinnet onk a CB-O-01 LF-O-01 CB-O-02 CY-O-01 CB-O-09 1 2 -in 18-in18-in 18-in18-in 12-in12- i n12-in12-in12-in12-in12- i n18-in 1 2 -i n 1 2-in 1 2-in 12-in1 2-in 12-in 15-in24-in24-in12-in18-in 18-in12-in1 2 -i n 18-in 12-in18-in12-in 1 2-in 1 2-in 12-in15-in12-in12-in24-in 12-in12-in12-in 18-in 18-in12-in30-in12-in12-in 1 8-in 12-in1 2 -i n 15-in1 5 -in 12-in12-in15-in15-in12-i n12-in 12-in 15-in12-in 12-in 15-in 1 2-in 18-in1 5 -i n 12-in15- i n12-in12-in 1 2-in 15-in12-in 1 2-in24-in18-in12-in12-in 18-in 1 2-in 18-in24-in15- i n12-in1 2-in 12-in 12-in 30-in15-in18-in15-in 12-in 1 2 -in 15-in 12-in 15-in 12-in18-in18-in18-in Qover=15 cfsQover=12 cfsQover=12 cf sQover=4 cfsQover=38 cfsQover=16 cfsQ o v e r =2 cf s Qover=1 cfsQover=17 cfsQ over= 5 cfs Qover=20 cfsQover=7 cfsQover=6 cfsQover=6 cfs Qover=6 cfs Q over=30 cfs Qover=6 cfsQover=4 cfsQover=25 cfsQover=3 cfsQ over=30 cfsC r y s t a l B a y C a r m a n B a y C a r m a n B a y S p r i n gParkBay L a f a y e t t eBay L a f a y e t t e B a y W e s tArmWestArm 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, E1 E2 E3 G2 F1 G1 F3 G3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I F2 Page 26 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PM"/"/ GoWX 960 950 9709 6 0950 9 4 0 9 6 0 95 0 950940930950 940 950 9 4 0 9609509409 3 0 950 9309609509 5 09409 5 0 9 4 0 940 930940960 930940950 950 9 4 0 9609 7 0 9 7 0 9 7 0 960 9 6 0960960 950950950 940950 940 940940940940940 9 3 0 960 12-inQover=1cfsVOID19.4 Ac Lafay et t eBay 12-in 1 8 -in 12-in Qover=4 cfsL a k eMinn e t o n k a L a k eMinneto n k a L a k eMinneto n k a L a k eMinneto n k a C a r m a nBay L a f a y e t t eBay L a f a y e t t e B a y T o n k a B a y 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, E2 E3 E4 G3 F2 G2 F4 G4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I F3 Page 27 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PM9709 6 0 950940950 9 4 0 9509409309 6 0 950970960950 940 950940950940960950950940950940940930 9 5 0 9309 4 0 9 5 0 9609609 6 0 950 96 0 9 5 0 930 940930 9309 3 0 930 930930930930 9 3 0 L a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, E3 E4 G4 F3 G3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I F4 Page 28 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR RR 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0990 9709 6 0 9 8 0960950 950930960950990 980 9 8 0970980970970960 970960 950940950940 9809709409301 0 1 0 980970940 960940 9409 3 010101020 1 0 1 0 10101 0 1 0 10001000 1000 98098098098097 0 970 970 97096 0960960940940940 940 9409309309 3 0930 CB-2131.6 Ac L a k eMinneto n k a S p r i n gPark B a y B l a c kLake 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, F1 F2 G2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I G1 Page 29 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PMR R R R "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %99709609509709609509709 6 0 960 950 940960950950940940930950 930940 9 5 0 980980960 9 5 0 9 5 0 950950950940 940 9 4 0 930 Casco CoveM a p leAveIVY PL CASCO AVE CascoPointRd CASCO CI RCB-P01 CB-P10 CB-P11 CB-P12 12-in12- i n18-in1 2-in 12-in12-in 1 8 -in12-in12-in 12-in 12-in Q10=3 cfs Q 10 = 2 cfsQ10=8cfsQ10=11 cfs Q 10 =7cfs Q 10=23 cfsQ10=28cfsQ10=1 cf sQ 1 0 =1 0 c fs Q10=11 cfsQ10=12cfsQover=14 cfsQover=11 cfsQover=12 cfs CB-01324.9 Ac CB-P117.5 Ac CB-0051.4 Ac CB-2263.5 Ac CB-2221.6 AcCB-2201.7 Ac CB-0061.1 AcCB-2131.6 Ac CB-P127.8 Ac CB-2101.1 Ac CB-P103.4 Ac CB-2020.8 Ac CB-2001.5 Ac CB-1971.6 Ac CB-1900.7 Ac CB-1871.3 Ac CB-1881.9 Ac CB-1923.8 Ac CB-1963.3 Ac CB-1654.4 AcCB-1675.0 Ac CB-O-08 CB-O-07 CB-O-05 CB-O-04 1 8 -in 12-in1 2 -in 1 2-in 1 2 -i n1 2-in 12-in 18-in 12-in1 2 -i n 12-in18-in6-in1 2-in 12-in 12-in 12-in 12-in12-in12-in Qover=18 cfsQ o v e r =2 cf s Q o v e r=1 cfsQ over=6 cfsQover=1 cfs L a k eMinneto n k a C a r m a n B a y S p r i n gParkBay S p r i n gParkBay T o n k aBay T o n k a B a y 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, F1 F2 F3 G1 G3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I G2 Page 30 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PM"/"/ GsWX 970940930970950 960950960940960 950 940 960950960950940950940 9409309509409509409 4 0930 9609 5095 094 0940 9 3 0 940 9 3 0 940 930 9 4 0 9 3 0 940 930 940930940 930 930 9409309309 5 0 930 950 960960960960960960950950950 9509409 5 0 940940930 930930940940940930940940940940940930940940940 9 4 0 940930 940930930930 9309309 3 0 930 9 3 0930 930 930930 930930 9 3 0 930 9 3 0 9309309 3 093093012-in12-in18-in CB-01324.9 Ac L a k eMinneto n k a L a k eMinneto n k a L a k eMinneto n k a L a k eMinneto n k a L a k eMinn e t o n k a C a r m a nBay C a r m a nBayLafa y e t t eBay L a f a y e t t e B a y T o n k a B a y 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, F2 F3 F4 G2 G4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I G3 Page 31 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_10-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:57 PM9 8 0 97 0960 9 6 0 9 5 0 940930970 9 5 0 9409 3 0940930 9509409909 8 0 9 7 0 950940 950940950940950940950940 950 940 950940950 940 940930930 9 8 0 9509 6 0 9609409 3 0 9 9 0 970 960 9 6 0960960960 960 950 9 5 0950950 950 950 950950950 9 4 0 940950940930940 940940 930 9 3 0 9 3 0 930L a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, F3 F4 G3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 10-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I G4 Page 32 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R RR "/"/%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 )n G¡WX GsWX )n1020101010009909809701010100099098097010101000990970 10009909701010 1000 980 10 0 0 9901 0 0 0 9 9 0 970 990980 990970 10101000 1000 990980970 990980 990 980 980970980970970 960970 960 1 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 96010209 9 0 9801000 1000 1010 10009901000 1000 990970 990 970980 970 1010 1 0 0 0 1000 10001000990990990 980 970 980980 970970970970 9 7 0 990 990 970 970 970 970 970 9 6 0 SPRUCE WAY WAYZATABLVDW C reekwoodT rTOWN LINE RDPC-P01 PC-P07 Q100=157 cfsQ100=97 cfsQ 1 0 0 = 1 6 cfs Q100=98 cfsQ100=34 cfsQ100=110cfsQ100=1325 cfsPC-P012209.5 Ac PC-P19283.3 Ac PC-P0763.8 Ac PC-05056.3 Ac PC-05056.3 Ac PC-P02168.0 Ac PC-119524.2 Ac PC-0017.4 Ac PC-04516.0 Ac PC-O-02PC-O-01 Q o v e r =4 6 c f s 18-in18-in1 8 -i n 60-in60-in24-in72-inK a t r i n a P a i n t e r C r e e k 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B1 A2 B2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I A1 Page 1 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GeWX 10501040103010201 01010009909 80 970 102010101000990 10101000 10201010100010009901000990 9 8 0 970 10101000990 9909801010 1000 10009 9 01000990 990980101010001000990 980970 10301 0 2 0 990980100010101020 1020 1 0 1 0 9 8 0 1 0 3 01030 1020 1 0 2 0 10201 0 2 0 1010 101010101010 101010001 0 0 0 1000 10001000990990 990 980 980990990 98 0980970990 9709709 7 0 970 9 7 0 970 S I X T H A V E N J a m estown Rd HOMESTEADTRLC-P01 LC-P02 LC-P03 PC-P02 PC-P06 Q100=209 cfs Q1 0 0 =4 c f s Q100=142 cfs Q100=94 cfsQ100=24 cfs Q 1 0 0 = 5 4 cfs Q100=7 cfsQ 100=40 cfs Q100=14 cfs Q100=143 cfs LC-P038.9 Ac LC-P0211.2 Ac LC-P0112.9 Ac LC-011184.0 Ac LC-09315.4 Ac LC-00518.5 Ac LC-00340.1 Ac PC-P012209.5 Ac PC-P012209.5 Ac PC-0193.0 Ac PC-P0615.6 Ac PC-0164.0 Ac PC-11731.3 Ac PC-04290.3 Ac PC-04013.5 Ac PC-P02168.0 Ac PC-119524.2 Ac PC-O-03 30- i n1 2-in 12-in 12-in 3 6 -i n 12-i n24-in 2 4-in Qover =57 cf sQ o v e r=2 0 c fs Qover=270 cfs Q o v e r =4 5 c f s L a k e C l a s s e n K a t r i n a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B2 A1 B1 A3 B3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I A2 Page 2 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R RRR R R "/"/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ !*" %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 GeWX 1030 102010101000990 1030 1020 1010 1000 990 980 1030 1020 1000 980 10301020101010001020100099010201000 9 9 0 103010101020 1010 10 5 0 1040 103010201 0 1 0 1000 101010 0 09 909 8 0 9601040 1 0 2 0 1010 1000 1000 990 10601050105010401020 1010 1 0 2 0101010101000 980 97 0 1050 10 4 0 1010 9 7 0960 10301 0 1 0 1010 1030 1 0 3 0 10009901020 1030 103010109 8 0 1050 10501050 1 0 5 0 1040 1050 1040 1040 1040 10401030103010301030102010301 0 2 0 10201 0 2 010101010 1 0 1 0 1010 10101010 1000101010101000 1000100099010009 8 0990 9 9 0 9 8 0 980 980980 9801050 1040 10 3 0 CoxFarmRdWILLOW DR NSalem Ct SIXTH AVE N ShadowoodDr OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD NWILLOW DRBROWN RD NWillowViewDrPhillips DrLL-P03 LL-P19 LL-P22 LL-P23 LL-P24LL-P25 LL-P26 PC-P18 15-in 24-in15-inQ100=6cfsQ100=4 cfsQ100=46cfsQ100=3cfsQ100=15cfsQ100=9 cfs Q100=3cfsQ100=30cfs Q100=112cfsQ 100= 134 cfs Q100=3 cfsQ100=31cfs Q100=132 cfsQ100=39 cfs Q100=5cf sQ100=118 cfs Q100=12 cfsQ100=5 cfsQ100=2 cf sQ100=110cfsQ100=209 cfs Q 1 0 0 =10 1 c fs Q100=140 cfs Q100=20 cfs Qover=24 cfs Qover=12cfsLL-P038.1 Ac LL-2330.6 Ac LL-P042.8 Ac LL-P195.8 Ac LL-P2214.9 Ac LL-P2310.9 Ac LL-P252.9 Ac LL-P244.3 Ac LL-0567.5 Ac LL-P21103.6 Ac LL-2181.8 Ac LL-2260.7 Ac LL-1667.8 Ac LL-1645.0 Ac LL-2233.5 Ac LL-23173.3 Ac LL-3093.4 Ac LL-3110.9 Ac SB-3188.2 Ac LL-0282.2 Ac LL-0615.8 Ac LL-3190.9 Ac LL-05 96.4 A c LL-0577.1 Ac LL-0534.9 Ac LL-P3120.8 Ac LL-3321586.6 Ac LC-00340.1 Ac PC-P012209.5 Ac PC-11413.9 Ac PC-11731.3 Ac PC-03453.0 Ac PC-04290.3 Ac PC-0363.3 Ac PC-04328.9 Ac PC-1163.5 Ac PC-11512.1 Ac PC-119524.2 Ac PC-O-04 PC-O-07 PC-O-06 LL-O-01 PC-O-08 Qover=15 cfsQo v e r = 1 4 c f s Q over=66 cfs Qover=91 cfs Q o v e r=1 7 2 c fs Qover=28 cfsQover=35 cfsQover=48 cfsQover=20 cfs Q ov er=81 cfs Qover=6 cfs Qo v e r = 9 2 c f sQover=190 cf s12-in12-in12-in12-in18-in12-in12-in12-in 24-in 12-in24-in 1 2 -i n 18-in 2 4 -in 24-in15-in15-in 15-in12-in15-in 18-in 12-in15-in12-in 1 8 -i n 24-in18-i n1 2-in 12-in18-in 12-in12-in24-in D i c k e y 's L a k e W o l s f e l d 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B3 A2 B2 A4 B4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I A3 Page 3 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9GeWX 1040103010201010102010101000990970960101010009909801 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 9 9 0 9601 0 0 0 990 9 8 0 970 1020 10101000 980 9 9 0 9 8 0 9 6 0 990980100097010201010103010201010 10201010101010009909909709 9 0 9 7 0 980970 9 9 0980970 9 9 0 9 8 0 970 9 6 0 980 960 1050 1040 101010001 0 2 0 1 0 1 010201 0 1 0 101010001 0 1 0100 0100099010009901 0 0 0 990 1 0 0 0 990990 980 9 8 0970980970970960103010201030 10201010 10001 0 0 0 99010009909909809 9 0 9 8 0 990 9809 8 0 9 7 0 970 960 970960 9709 6 0 970960 97 0 960 103098010301030960 9 5 0 1 0 0 095099 0 10301020 1000 1 0 3 0 1030 1 0 3 0 1010 1020 10201020 1020 102010101010 101010101010 10001 0 1 0 1010 1 0 0 0 100010009 9 0 990990 990 990 9 9 0 1000100010001000990 990 980 9 9 0 980990990990980980990990990990990990990 99 0990990970980 9 8 0960 960960970960 960 9 7 0 990 9 9 0 980970S IXTH AV E NKnollMannorR dTAMARACK DRWynd mereRd Tanglewood RdLAKEVIEWTERLL-P05 LL-P30 LL-P31 LL-P33 LL-P34 LL-P35 LL-P38 LL-P39 LL-P56 LL-P57 Q 1 0 0 =2 4cfs Q100=5cfs Q100=42cfs Q100=16 cfsQ100=248 cfs Q100=232 cfs Q 1 0 0 =2 5 c fs Q 1 0 0 =1 2 c f sQ100=2 3cfs Q100=18 cfsQ100=1 cfsQ100=2 cfsQ100=246 cfsQ100=52 cfs Q100=113 cfsQ100=50 cfsQ1 0 0 = 8 4 c f s Q 100= 363 cfs Q 1 0 0 =2 5 5 c f s Q100=144 cfs LL-3292162.8 Ac LL-P20488.7 Ac LL-P20488.7 Ac LL-12611.5 Ac LL-P3353.5 Ac LL-3353.5 Ac LL-1278.0 Ac LL-P244.3 Ac LL-05 67.5 A c LL-0615.8 Ac LL-05 96.4 A c LL-P3120.8 Ac LL-P5773.2 Ac LL-3433.1 Ac LL-P3931.0 Ac LL-P057.8 Ac LL-P559.6 Ac LL-3411.3 Ac LL-13320.8 Ac LL-1386.8 Ac LL-1394.6 Ac LL-P3854.3 Ac LL-1368.9 Ac LL-14113.8 Ac LL-P4015.3 Ac LL-03 11.7 A cLL-P304.1 Ac LL-P342.8 Ac LL-0324.3 Ac LL-P562.4 Ac LL-13511.3 Ac LL-33915.2 Ac LL-P3742.9 Ac LL-3321586.6 Ac LL-33061.1 Ac LL-O-02 Q over=24 cfsQ o v e r =1 5 c f s Qover=2 cfs Q o v e r =8 c f sQover=13 cfsQ o v e r=4 0 c fs Qover=11 cfs 15-in18-in 1 8 -i n 18-in 15-in 48-in 18-in1 2 -i n24-in24-in18-in48-inW o l s f e l d 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B4 A3 B3 A5 B5 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I A4 Page 4 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R "/ "/"/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GeWX10601 0 5 010 209 9 0 10501040103010201010100010101000105010401030 1020 1010 1000990104010301020101010201010103010201 0 3 01000 10201010 10 5 0 1 0 4 010401 0 3 0 98097098 097010501040 10501040 104010301 0 4 01030 10301020103010201 0 2 0 1010 1000 99010009901 0 1 0 10001 0 6 01020980 990 10409 9 098010301030 10 2 0 99099010601040 10401040 1040104010401 0 3 0 1030 1030103010301030 10301030 10301 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 10301020 10201 0 2 0 10201 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 10001000 1000 9 9 0 10009909809909909809701 0 0 0 990 9 8 0 HollanderRdSIXTH AVE N HunterPas s HUNTER DRMooneyLakeDrSPR IN G H ILLR D W IL L O W B R O O K DRLL-P08 LL-P11 LL-P39 LL-P40 LL-P43 LL-P44 LL-P45 LL-P46 LL-P48 LL-P58 LL-P59 MO-P01 MO-P02 MO-P03 MO-P04 MO-P05 MO-P07 MO-P08 12-in 4 8 -in Q100=9cfs Q100=13cfs Q 100=25cfsQ100=12cfsQ100=77cfsQ 1 0 0 =7 7 cfsQ100=39 cfsQ100=75 cfsQ 1 0 0 =1 6 c f s Q100=2 cfs Q 1 0 0 =62 cf s Q 1 0 0 =5 7 cfsQ100=24 cfsQ1 00 =54 c f sQ100=42 cfsQ100=4 cfs Q 1 0 0 = 1 0 5 cfs Q 1 0 0 =3 cfsQ1 0 0 =8 4 c f s VOID415.1 Ac VOID7.7 AcMO-P054.4 Ac MO-P036.5 Ac MO-P0424.5 Ac LL-3292162.8 Ac LL-3292162.8 Ac MO-P0713.7 Ac MO-06818.8 Ac LL-0176.0 Ac LL-P109.4 Ac LL-3561.8 Ac LL-P6017.5 Ac LL-P112.2 Ac LL-14526.6 Ac LL-P5773.2 Ac LL-P454.3 Ac LL-P4639.2 Ac LL-P5889.2 Ac LL-1432.2 Ac LL-P591.0 Ac LL-3572.0 Ac LL-00110.5 Ac LL-14421.0 Ac LL-3493.8 Ac LL-P3931.0 Ac LL-14113.8 Ac LL-P4015.3 Ac LL-P4420.3 Ac LL-P4812.2 Ac MO-P0114.7 Ac LL-O-03 LL-O-10 MO-O-01 MO-O-02 Qover=7 cfs Qover=68 cfsQover=6 cfs Qover=30 cfs Qover=3 cfs Q o v e r =1 7 c fs Qover=11 cfs Qover=14 cfs 15-in18-in 30-in12-in 12-in 12-in12-in 1 5-in 1 8 -in 24-in15-in48-in54-in1 8 -in 2 4 -in M o o n e yLake M o o n e y L a k e 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B5 A4 B4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I A5 Page 5 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GeWX GeWX 1040103010201010100099098097096095010201000970 1010 990 10401030102010101000103010201010 1000 1000 970 9601010 9909809701 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1000 990 980 10009909809 9 098 01 0 0 0 9 9 0 1000 990 990 980 9 9 0 9 8 0 960 950 940970960 9 4 0 9 8 0 1 0401 0 0 0 960990 9 7 0 9701010 990 970 9709601 0 4 0 10401 0 1 0 10001 0 1 0 10101010 1000 1000 1000 1000 10001000 1000990990990990990 9 8 0 980980980 980 980 980 980 9809709 7 0 960940990 9 9 0 980 970 LUCE LINE TR TurnhamDrS IX T H A V E N MCCULLEY RDCHIPPEWA LA WolvertonPl WATERTOWNRDTOWN LINE RDKokeshFarmRdTURNHAM RDHuntFarmRd DeborahDr ORCHARD PARK RDPC-P10 PC-P11 PC-P12 PC-P13 PC-P14 PC-P15PC-P16 PC-P17 PC-P20 PC-P22 SB-P01 SB-P02 SB-P03 SB-P04 SB-P20 SB-P2115-i n12-in1 5 -in 15-in 2 4 -in Q100=80 cfsQ100=16cfsQ100=88cfsQ 1 0 0 =1 0 c fs Q100=73 cfs Q100=18cfs Q100=2cfsQ100=15 cfsQ 1 0 0 =1 0cf s Q100=2 cfs Q100=25cfsQ100=9cfs Q100=60 cfs Q100=238 cfs Q100=2cfsQ100=288 cf sQ100=1 cfs Q100=121 cfs Q100=124cfsQ100=86 cfsQ100=56 cfsQ100=125 cfsQ100=254 cfs Q100=19 cfsQ100=52 cfsQ100=28 cfsQ1 0 0 = 6 5 c f s Q100=82 cfsQ 10 0 = 49 cfs Q 1 0 0 =3 8 c f s Q1 0 0 = 1 7 9 c fs Q100=278 cfs Q100=25 cfsQ100=17 cfsQ100=106 cfsQ100=110 cfsQ100=4 cfsQ100=117 cfsQ100=34 cfs Q100=159 cfsQ100=26 cfs Q100=113 cfsQ o v e r =1 5cfs Q o v e r =4 6 c f s Qover=33 cfsSB-00311.9 Ac SB-P0130.0 Ac SB-1026.7 Ac SB-P0236.6 Ac SB-P2121.3 Ac SB-P0346.8 Ac SB-P203.9 Ac SB-P0415.1 Ac SB-08515.4 Ac SB-10639.9 AcSB-00423.9 Ac SB-020157.3 Ac PC-P19283.3 Ac PC-P169.3 Ac PC-P1050.0 Ac PC-1040.8 Ac PC-1050.6 Ac PC-1021.4 Ac PC-P1140.0 Ac PC-P1222.6 Ac PC-02712.5 Ac PC-P0763.8 Ac PC-P1415.7 Ac PC-P1510.0 Ac PC-0854.0 Ac PC-0953.3 Ac PC-07857.4 Ac PC-05056.3 Ac PC-11323.8 Ac PC-1114.7 Ac PC-1098.3 Ac PC-P02168.0 Ac PC-0017.4 Ac PC-04516.0 Ac PC-03115.3 Ac PC-0790.7 Ac PC-0922.3 Ac PC-07647.6 Ac PC-P2064.4 Ac PC-07214.1 Ac PC-05114.3 Ac PC-P139.1 Ac PC-0832.0 Ac PC-0688.5 Ac PC-P056.0 Ac PC-O-10 PC-O-09 PC-O-11 PC-O-12 SB-O-01 Qover=52 cfsQover=41 cfsQover=13 cfsQ o v e r =3 0 c f s Qover=75 cfsQover=33 cfs Qover=57 cfs Qover=3 cfs Qover=124 cfsQover=89 cfsQover=15 cfsQ o v e r =8 c f s 1 2 -in 18-in 12-in12-in1 2-in 12- i n18-in18-in12-in18-in18-in18-in1 8 -i n 1 2 -i n 27-in 1 2-in 18-in12-in18-in24-in24-in 1 8 -i n 12-i n36-in24-in15-in24-in12-in 18-in12-in12-in1 2 -in 5 4-in 15-in24-in 12-in12-in15-in1 2 -in 12-in 6-inP a i n t e r C r e e k 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, A1 A2 C1 B2 C2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I B1 Page 6 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/ !*" !*" !*" %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5!5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 )n GeWX GeWX )n 1 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 10301020 1 0 1 01000 1000 990980 9701 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 3 010 2 0 1010 10101000990980101010009801020101010009901000 990101010001000 980 102010101 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1000 990 1000990980 9709 8 0 970 1 0 0 0 990 990 980 10201000 990 1020 1020990 1000 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1010 980 1 0 0 0 990970 9701 04010101000 1000 100 0 1000990990 990 980 980 980 980970970 970970 1000 990 9 8 0 9809 8 0 9 7 0 970 970 9 7 0SIXTHAVEN Lillian L n JacobsMillRd WAYZATA BLVD W WATERTOWN RD USHWYNO12 STUBBS BAY RD NLC-P04 LC-P05 LC-P06 LC-P16 PC-P03 PC-P04PC-P05 PC-P06 PC-P08 PC-P09 PC-P21 12-in6-in12-inQ100=18cfs Q100=17 cfs Q100=478cfsQ100=15 cfs Q100=13 cfs Q100=94cfsQ100=8cfs Q100=10 cfsQ100=7 cfsQ1 0 0 = 4 0 c f s Q100=268 cfs Q100=36 cf sQ100=37 cfsQ100=24cfsQ100=1 cfsQ100=85 cfs Q 1 0 0 =2 0 1 c fs Q100=21 cfsQ100=23 cfsQ100=8 cfs Q 100=55 cfs Q100=188 cfs Q 1 0 0=14 5 c fs Q100=11 cf sQ 100= 28 cfs Q100=137 cfsQ100=1278 cfsQ 100=458 cfsQ100=219 cfsQ100=9 cfsQ100=6 cfs Q100=1 cfs LL-09116.7 Ac LL-20013.6 Ac LC-034206.6 Ac LC-011184.0 Ac LC-0908.8 Ac LC-P0422.9 Ac LC-017100.5 Ac LC-02314.4 Ac LC-0825.0 Ac LC-P1621.4 Ac LC-0268.4 Ac LC-02520.1 Ac LC-0296.6 Ac LC-0327.0 Ac LC-P1115.7 Ac LC-00518.5 Ac LC-00624.6 Ac LC-00340.1 Ac SB-P1914.5 Ac SB-P2121.3 Ac SB-10639.9 Ac PC-0193.0 Ac PC-P2111.7 Ac PC-P046.2 Ac PC-P0311.2 Ac PC-P0615.6 Ac PC-0164.0 Ac PC-0233.6 Ac PC-P089.8 Ac PC-P1050.0 Ac PC-P0915.8 Ac PC-P1140.0 Ac PC-P1222.6 Ac PC-P0763.8 Ac PC-P02168.0 Ac LC-P061.6 Ac SB-1044.6 Ac PC-0143.1 Ac PC-P056.0 Ac PC-O-03 LC-O-04 LC-O-01 LC-O-03 LC-O-06 LC-O-02 Qover=7 cfs Q o v e r=2 0 c fs Qover=30 cfsQ o v e r=6 7 c fs Qover=270 cfs Q o v er = 1 0 1 cfsQover=14 cf sQ over=54 cfs Qover=40 cfs 18-in 12-in24-in 18-in 1 2-in 1 5 -i n 15-in15-in 1 5 -in 12-in 24-in 2 7-in 36-in24-in18-in21-in24- i n12-in18-in12-in18-in36-in2 4-in 36-in18-in 21-in 36-in36-in18-in 18-in 15-in L a k e C l a s s e n 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, A1 A2 A3 C2 B1 C1 B3 C3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I B2 Page 7 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/"/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/"/"/"/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/"/"/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/"/"/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/ "/"/"/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/"/ !*" !*" %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5!5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5!5 !5 !5 !5!5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 )n )n 1 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 2 01010 9709601030 1 0 2 0 10101000 10009901 0 1 0 1000990980 970960 1 0 3 0 1020 1030102010301020101010001010 1000 10009909809701 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 103010 1 0 1010 990 10401040 102010301030 1030 1 0 3 01030 1030 1 0 2 0 1030 102010101000 1 0 1 0 10101000 9 9 0 9909 9 0 970 980 9 7 0960 9509501030 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 10 1 0 1000 Sandstone La OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD NSilverView D r WAYZATA BLVD WCobblestoneCt WoodDuckTrl Br i dgewater Dr GLENDALE DR L i l l i an LnGoldenrod WaySANDHILLDRWoodhaven Dr BROWN RD NWill o w ViewDr BoulderDrSandst o ne C tDICKEYLAKEDR Sugarwood Dr WILLOW DR NLL-P01 LL-P02 LL-P06 LL-P16 LL-P19 LL-P27 LL-P28 TL-P08TL-P51 18-in1 2-in 12-in12-in15-in18-in36-in12-in48-in18-in15-in 15.96-in15-in 15-in12-in 24-in 18-in 15-in42-in 12-in 12-inQ 10 0 = 3 cfs Q100=6cfsQ100=12cfsQ100=20cfs Q 1 0 0 =1 8c fs Q 1 0 0 =8 2 c fs Q100=105cfs Q 100= 12 cfs Q100=16cfs Q100=2cfsQ100=67cfs Q100=38cf sQ 1 0 0=26cfs Q100=26cfsQ100=11cfsQ100=10cfsQ100=20cfsQ 1 0 0 =1 6cfsQ100=67cfsQ100=4cfsQ 1 0 0 =2 3cfs Q 1 0 0 =1 3 6 c fsQ100=1 cfs Q100=35cfs Q100=22 cfsQ100=7 cfsQ100=115 cfsQ100=190 cfsQ100=41 cfs Q100=9 cfsQ100=90cfsQ 100=3 7 cfsQ100=20cfsQ100=132 cfsQ 100=106 cfs Q100=13cfs Q100=153 cfsQ100=57 cfsQ100=114 cfs Q 10 0 = 87 cfsQ100=25 cfs Q100=27 cfs Q100=5cf sQ100=22 cfs Q 1 0 0 =6 3cfs Q100=4 cfsQ 100=418 cfsQ 1 0 0 = 1 4 6 cfsQ10 0=4 cfsQ100=56 cfs Q 1 0 0 = 5 cfs Q100=69 cfs Q100=2 cfs Q100=36 cfs Q100=4 cfs Q 100=32 cfs Q 10 0 = 13 cfs Q100=96 cfsQ100=175 cfsQ100=230 cfsQ100=457 cfsQ100=118 cfsQ 100= 73 cfs Q100=36 cfs Q100=59 cfs Q100=218 cfs Q 100=54 cfsQ100=15 cfs Q100=15cfs Qover=26cfsQover=6cfsQover=11 cfs Qover=11cfs Qover=32cfsQ ov er=7 cfs Qover=62cfs Q o v er= 1 1 cfs Qover=30 cfs LL-P20488.7 Ac LL-08715.1 Ac LL-08612.4 AcLL-0834.3 Ac LL-P278.9 Ac LL-08917.0 Ac LL-26720.8 Ac LL-19968.4 Ac LL-P195.8 Ac LL-1542.2 Ac LL-P21103.6 Ac LL-2703.6 Ac LL-26916.6 Ac LL-30512.7 Ac LL-3071.9 Ac LL-0909.6 Ac LL-26512.1 Ac LL-09116.7 Ac LL-20013.6 Ac LL-P0619.4 Ac LL-P2916.9 Ac LL-27226.8 Ac LL-0453.7 Ac LL-0742.0 Ac LL-0760.7 Ac LL-2094.9 Ac LL-23173.3 Ac LL-2361.8 Ac LL-2415.2 Ac LL-2446.7 Ac LL-0675.8 Ac LL-0711.4 Ac LL-2340.8 Ac LL-2204.6 Ac LL-01 43.2 A c LL-1803.7 Ac LL-1711.6 Ac LL-P167.1 Ac LL-10113.5 Ac LL-0577.1 AcLL-0534.9 Ac LL-1225.0 Ac LL-1252.6 Ac LL-1192.1 Ac LL-1133.0 Ac LL-1105.9 Ac LL-0927.0 Ac LL-1025.7 Ac SB-32123.4 Ac LL-P3120.8 Ac LL-27433.5 Ac LL-06414.0 Ac LL-0808.5 Ac LL-07816.9 Ac LL-1773.3 Ac LL-1603.3 Ac LL-1784.7 Ac LL-P2810.4 Ac LL-08217.8 Ac LL-19111.5 Ac LL-2963.2 Ac LL-2958.1 Ac LL-19612.1 Ac LL-1949.2 Ac TL-3044.6 Ac TL-3156.5 Ac LC-034206.6 Ac LC-011184.0 Ac LC-0908.8 Ac LC-017100.5 Ac LC-P1115.7 Ac LC-00624.6 Ac LC-00340.1 Ac TL-P5111.4 Ac TL-1699.6 Ac TL-17 12.9 Ac TL-1792.6 Ac TL-1800.9 Ac TL-2984.7 Ac TL-1831.9 Ac TL-1841.3 Ac TL-1923.7 Ac TL-1786.4 Ac TL-P0995.8 AcFR-08817.6 Ac PC-11731.3 Ac LL-06 92.1 A c LL-0701.4 Ac LL-0433.6 Ac LL-1763.3 Ac LL-17 21.5 A c FR-0831.9 Ac LL-O-04 LL-O-05 TL-O-01 LL-O-07 TL-O-02 LL-O-0615-in12-in12-in 12-in 30-in 15-in 24-in12-in3 0 -in12-in 15-in 12-in 30-in18-in15-in12-in18-in 12-in 12-in18-in 21.96-in 12-in30-in36-in27-in 15.96-in1 2 -i n 18-in18-in 12-in12-in18-in12-in1 2 -in 18-in 15-in12-in 27-in12-in 24-in15-in12-in15-in24-in 24-in12-in36-in15-in12-in 12-in 1 2 -i n 30-in 1 2 -in 15-in 72-in1 8 -in 30-in 12-in 18-in12-in 27-in36-in18-in30-in 36-in15-in48-in 15-in 30-in18-in36-in12-in48-in 12-in36-in12-in 12-in 30-in 1 8 -in 48-in 12-in 18-in18-in 18- i n24-in18-in 30-in 60-in 1 2 -i n 30-in 1 8 -i n30-in42-in24-in 48-in18-in24-in 12-in1 5 -in 54-in1 5 -i n 12-in 60-in12-in42-in12-in54-in15-in 36-in 18-in 24-in21-in Q o v e r = 8 1 cfsQover=46 cfsQover=27 cfs Qover=11 cfsQover=54 cfsQover=53 cfsQ o v e r=3 7 c fs Qover=2 cfsQ o v e r = 9 4 cfs Qover=11 cfsQover=88 cfsQover=29 cfsQover=19 cfs Qover=131 cfsQover=163 cfs Qover=29 cfs Qover=36 cfs Qover=14 cfs Q over=51 cfsQover=23 cfsQover=50 cfs Qover=88 cfs Qover=22 cfs Q o v e r =1 5 c f s Q over=9 cfsQover=13 cfs D i c k e y 'sLake 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, A2 A3 A4 C3 B2 C2 B4 C4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I B3 Page 8 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R "/"/"/"/ "/ "/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 !5 %9 %9 )n 1010 990 970 960 102010101000 980 970 100 09 9 09 8 0 9 7 0 9 6 0950 10101000 9809701 0 1 01000 990 960 1000 980 960 990 970 980960990980950990980 970960980 970990 980 970 960 970960970960 97095010101000970960960950960 9509 5 0 990 950 9 9 0 980 9 7 0 9501010 950 98098010001000 9 9 0 9709 5 0 950 1020100010001 0 0 0 990 10009901000 1000 9909 9 0 9 9 0990980 990 9 8 0 9 8 0 980970 9 8 0 9 8 0980 980 970970 970 9 7 0970970970 970960 960960960960 950 950950 950 950 9 5 0 9 5 0 9 9 0 970 950 950WA Y Z A T A B L V D WD A KOTA AVE WestFarm R d OLD LONG LAKE RD BROWNRDN SPRINGHILLRD USHWYNO12 EASTLONG L A K E R D LongLakeBlvd LL-P31 LL-P32 LL-P35 LL-P36 LL-P37 LL-P41 LL-P51 LL-P55 TL-P01 TL-P05 TL-P17 TL-P20 18-in Q100=288cfsQ100=16 cfs Q100=26cf sQ100=45cfsQ100=16 cfs Q100=227 cfs Q100=5 c f sQ100=1cfsQ100=17 cfs Q100=150 cfs Q1 0 0 = 1 4 6 cfs Q100=56cfsQ100=15cfsQ100=55 cfsQ100=18 cfsQ100=225 cfs Q100=37 cfsQ100=141 cfsQ100=53 cfsQ100=6 cfs Q100=225 cfs Q100=418 cfsQ100=95 cfsQ 100=270 cfs Q 100=232 cfs Q100=376 cfs Q100=41 cfsQover=31cfs Qover=18cfs LL-P20488.7 Ac LL-19968.4 Ac LL-P 5061.5 Ac LL-P4939.4 Ac LL-P5124.7 Ac TL-P0545.3 Ac SB-32123.4 Ac LL-P3120.8 Ac LL-P0 57.8 Ac LL-P559.6 Ac LL-P418.9 Ac LL-14113.8 Ac TL-P2037.7 Ac TL-0472.1 Ac LL-27433.5 Ac LL-2146.3 Ac LL-0311.7 AcLL-P304.1 Ac LL-P322.9 Ac LL-3231.8 Ac LL-0324.3 Ac LL-33915.2 Ac LL-P3742.9 Ac LL-3256.3 Ac LL-06414.0 Ac TL-3063.5 AcTL-P1717.8 Ac TL-21215.8 AcTL-P1810.9 Ac TL-P018.3 Ac TL-P11115.6 Ac LL-O-08Qover=29 cfsQover=66 cfs Qover=38 cfsQover=30 cfsQover=22 cfs 24-in15-in24- i n24-in15-in48-in 24-in15-in48-in 24-in48-in72-in24-in24-in 60-in 36-in36-in27-in36-in27-in24-in72-in29.04-in27-in 15-in 24-in L o n g L a k e 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, A3 A4 A5 C4 B3 C3 B5 C5 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I B4 Page 9 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GeWX 1020101010009909701 0 6 0105 0 1 0 4 0 1040 1030102010101000990980970 1020 990 980 9 7 0 1000 960 950 1040 102010101000990 10009901 0 1 0 1 0 0 0990 980 1000990 980 1050104010101000 990 9 8 0 9909 8 0 102010101010100010009901000990980 970 9 9 0 9 7 0 98 0 970970 960980970980970960 980 97010301 0 2 0 102010101000990 980970980 970 980 9 7 0980 970 9 8 0970 9809701030980 1 0 1 0 10501030102010101 0 6 0 1 0 5 0 9 9 0990980980 9809609609 6 0103010401040 1 0 4 0 104010301030 1020 1 0 0 0 101 0 1010 101010101 0 1 0 10101010990 100010001 0 0 0 1000 1000 9 8 0 990 9 9 0 990 990990 980980 980970980 980 970980 980980970970 970970 9 7 0 960970 9609 6 0 960960 950 970 9 7 0 960 PrairieViewLnRuannRdSIXTHAVEN L U CE LINE TR Hollander Rd OLDLONGLAKERD SPRINGHILLRDFERNDALE RD NWakefieldRdCHEVYCHASEDRHA-P01 LL-P07 LL-P09 LL-P10 LL-P11 LL-P12 LL-P13 LL-P14 LL-P15 LL-P41 LL-P42 LL-P48 LL-P49 LL-P50 LL-P52 MO-P05 PL-P03 PL-P04 PL-P05 PL-P08 PL-P09 PL-P65 12-in 12-in 12-in 12-in 12-in1 2 -in 24-in 1 2 -i n 24-in 15-in24-in12-inQ100=3cfsQ 1 0 0 = 1 2 cfsQ100=80 cfsQ100=18 cfsQ100=57cfsQ100=83 cfsQ100=24 cfs Q100=54cfsQ100=42 cfsQ100=17 cfsQ100=55 cfsQ100=95 cfsQ100=79 cfsQ100=92 cfs Q100=32 cfs Q 100=10 cfsQ100=12 cfs Q1 0 0 =1 0 5 c f s Q100=64 cfs Q100=60 cfsQ100=26 cfsQ100=12 cfs Q100=6 cfs Q100=1 cfs Q100=159 cfs Q100=54 cf sQ100=61 cfsQ 1 0 0 = 1 0 8 c fs Q100=15 cfs Q100=100 cfs Qover=4 cfs Qover=2 cfsQover=13 cfsQover=20cfsVOID415.1 Ac MO-1567.5 Ac HA-0031.4 Ac VOID7.7 Ac MO-P054.4 Ac MO-P036.5 Ac MO-P0424.5 Ac LL-P20488.7 Ac LL-P1520.1 Ac LL-P1417.2 Ac LL-0176.0 Ac LL-P123.3 Ac LL-P109.4 Ac LL-P0922.1 Ac LL-P134.9 Ac LL-P5226.5 Ac LL-P5061.5 Ac LL-P4939.4 Ac LL-P5124.7 Ac LL-00912.3 Ac LL-P5498.2 Ac LL-P6017.5 Ac LL -P112.2 Ac LL-14526.6 Ac LL-3547.5 Ac LL-P0747.7 Ac LL-P424.7 Ac LL-P418.9 Ac LL-14113.8 Ac LL-P4015.3 Ac LL-P4812.2 Ac HA-0220.7 Ac HA-0102.3 Ac HA-00119.7 Ac HA-P0126.4 Ac HA-0537.5 Ac HA-0544.2 Ac HA-0396.4 Ac HA-0241.1 Ac PL-16687.3 Ac PL-P1116.2 Ac PL-06313.0 Ac PL-P0936.9 Ac PL-P6527.4 Ac PL-P033.0 Ac PL-P046.8 Ac PL-P0529.8 Ac PL-P0810.0 Ac PL-P0624.0 Ac HA-0020.8 Ac LL-P5311.5 Ac HA-O-01 HA-O-02 LL-O-10 LL-O-09 HA-O-03 12-in 12-in 12-in12-in24-in 12-in 2 4 -i n 12-in12 - i n24-in18-in12-in 1 2 -in 12-in 1 2-in 12-in 12-in 60-in 12-in 12-in24-in 36-in 12-in24-in4 8 -in 12-in12-in12-in24-in24-in12-i n24-in 12-in 24-in24-in12-in15-in24-in18-in24-in24-in24-in24-in18-in36-inQover=59 cfsQover=56 cfs Qover=31 cfs Qover=25 cfsQover=36 cf sH a d l e yLake L o n gLake L y d i a r dLake 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, A4 A5 C5 B4 C4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I B5 Page 10 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9 !5 %9 %9 %9 GÞWX GsWX 103010201 0 1 0 1 0 0 0990 9809609 5 0 9 4 0 990 98 09 7 09 6 0 9 9 0 9 6 0 95 0 9 7 0 960 9509 4 0 10101000990102010109 9 0 9 9 0 980 9 7 0 1 0 0 0 99 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 3 01020 9809 7 0990980 1 0 0 0 99 0 970960950 970 960 97096095010401 0 3 01000 990 10101 0 0 0 9 90 1000 9 8 0 980 970970960 960950950 940 9409309 5 0940 950 940 990980970 980 970 9409301040970940970 1000 960102010009 9 0 99010009 7010201010980980980 960 9301040104010401030 103010301030 103010101020 1 0 2 0 1010 10109901000 10001 0 0 010001000 9 9 0 980980980 970970 970970970 960960950950 950940 9 3 0 930930930 930 9 3 0 930 930 CristoforiCirS t A ndrewsSt BAYSIDE RD Westlake StBaysideTrlMCCULLEY RDCO RD NO 19NORTH ARM DR W N O RTH A R M D R TONKAWA RDPARKLALuceLineRidgeNORTHARMLAAugustaStLa keviewPkwy FL-P01 FL-P02 NA-P02 NA-P05 NA-P07 SB-P06 SB-P07 SB-P09 SB-P20 2 4 -in 15-in12-in 36-in12-in12-in24-in 12-in Q100=8cf sQ100=29cfsQ100=8cfs Q100=110 cfs Q 1 0 0 =2 3cfs Q100=9 cfs Q100=47cfs Q100=11 cfsQ100=52cfsQ100=38 cfsQ100=77 cfsQ100=36 cfs Q100=69 cfsQ100=27c f s Q 1 0 0 =2 0 4cfs Q100=9 cfsQ100=55 cfs Q 1 0 0 = 2 4 cfs Q 1 0 0 =3 8 c f s Q100=65 cfs Q 1 0 0 =4 0 c fsQ100=127 cfsQ100=15cfsQ100=5 cfsQ100=124 cfsQ100=53 cfs Q 100=15 cfs Q100=95 cfs Q100=29cfsQ100=39cfs Q 1 0 0 =3 6 c f s Q100=71 cfsQ 1 0 0 =3 2 c f s Q100=105 cfs Q 1 0 0 =4 2 c fs Q 1 0 0 = 1 6 7 cfs Q100=136 cfs Q 1 0 0 =7 4 cfs Q100=221 cfsQ 1 0 0 =5 cfsQ100=3 cfsQ100=900 cfsQ100=146 cfsQ100=5 cfsQ100=29 cfs Q100=232 cfs Q100=4 cfs Q 1 0 0 =6 c f s Q 10 0 = 29 cfs Q100=590 cfsQ100=285 cfs Qover=27 cfsQover=11 cfs Qover=4 cfs SB-075279.8 Ac SB-P203.9 Ac SB-P0415.1 Ac SB-0215.7 Ac SB-10639.9 Ac SB-P074.5 Ac SB-01122.3 Ac SB-00423.9 Ac SB-020157.3 Ac SB-P064.7 Ac SB-0327.6 Ac SB-P098.6 Ac SB-0272.5 Ac SB-0076.6 Ac SB-0332.4 Ac SB-0351.0 Ac FL-00114.5 Ac FL-P0124.2 Ac FL-0045.7 Ac FL-P07316.2 Ac FL-0323.7 Ac FL-0994.7 Ac FL-00623.0 Ac FL-04115.0 Ac FL-P0226.3 Ac FL-P0328.7 AcFL-0167.9 Ac FL-00813.9 Ac FL-0121.3 AcFL-0142.1 Ac FL-P043.0 Ac FL-0173.1 Ac PC-0295.3 Ac PC-07647.6 Ac PC-0666.1 Ac PC-0586.4 Ac PC-0565.1 AcPC-0255.4 Ac PC-0600.9 Ac PC-1073.8 Ac PC-P2064.4 Ac NA-065469.1 Ac NA-0703.2 Ac NA-06837.3 Ac NA-P026.1 Ac NA-P0714.5 Ac NA-06267.3 Ac NA-06775.4 Ac NA-0441.2 Ac NA-0423.3 Ac NA-0432.0 Ac NA-P0510.6 Ac NA-0451.6 Ac NA-0531.6 Ac NA-0471.1 Ac NA-0501.6 Ac NA-0570.8 Ac NA-0593.7 Ac NA-0565.1 Ac NA-0731.0 Ac NA-P012.2 Ac NA-O-01 NA-O-02 PC-O-13 Q o v e r=9 cfsQover=5 cfsQover=3 cfsQover =7 cf sQover=13 cfsQover=30 cfsQover=1 cfsQover=94 cfsQover=116 cfsQover=19 cfs Q o v e r = 2 8 cfs Qover=24 cfs Qover=30 cfsQover=73 cfs Q ov er=54 cfs Qover=44 cfs Qover=26 cfs Qover=64 cfsQover=58 cfsQ over=34 cfsQover=29 cfs Qover=44 cfs Qo v e r = 8 5 c f s Q o v e r=3 5 c fs 15-in1 8 -in 12-in15-i n12-in 18-in2 4 -in15-in15-in15-in 30-in1 8 -in 15-in 15-in 24-in1 8 -i n 12-in 1 2 -i n 12-in24-in1 2 -in 12-in24-in 24-in 1 8-in 15-in18-in 24-in 18-in 18-in 15-in18-in1 8 -i n 24-in 15-in24-in24-in24-in 24-in 1 8 -i n 24-in 6-inS t u b b sBay N o r t h A r m 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B1 B2 D1 C2 D2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I C1 Page 11 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RR RRR R "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ !*" !*" %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9%9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GÞWX GÞWX GÞWX 1040 1030 1020 970 1 0 5 0 10109 9 0 960 950 940 1040103010201010100010201010100099010009901010 980 990 980 9 7 0 9 5 0 94 0 930 9 5 09401010 10001 0 1 010001000990 980 970 980 970 9 6 0 950 960940950 940 1000990980 9 7 0 980 970960950980 9909809709609 4 0 990970 9 6 0 9501020 102010101000 10001 0 0 0 9 9 0 990 990990 9 9 0 9 9 0 990 980 9 7 0 9 8 09809809809 8 0 980 9 8 0 970970 960 96096096093 0 9 3 0 940930 9309 7 0 BAYSIDE RD EILEEN ST Wear LaEastlake St SussexLaLillian L n BEDERWOODDRFox St RidgewoodCir Somerset La Christine Dr TONKA AVEKintyreLa WEARLANCRESTVIEW AVEHIGHLA CrystalCreekRdWATERTOWNRD STUBBS BAY RD SLUCE LINE TR CYGNETPLSussex Rd OxfordRdGr a h a mHillRdLEAF STFR-P20 LC-P07 LC-P09 LC-P10 LC-P11 LC-P12 LC-P13 LC-P14 LC-P15 LC-P17 LC-P18 LC-P19 LC-P20 LL-P61 MB-P01 MB-P02 SB-P05 SB-P10SB-P12 SB-P13 SB-P14 SB-P15 SB-P17 SB-P19 15-in12-in12-in 12-in12-in1 2 -in 1 5-in 18-in15-in24-inQ100=14 cfs Q100=76cfsQ100=102 cfsQ100=67 cfs Q100=154cfsQ100=238cfsQ 1 0 0 =9cfs Q100=15cfsQ100=11cfsQ 100=4 cfsQ100=161 cfsQ100=5cfs Q100=882 cfs Q100=81cfsQ100=22cfsQ100=56cfsQ100=6 cfs Q100=900cfs Q 1 0 0 =2 4cfs Q100=14 cfs Q100=40cfs Q 100=171 cfs Q 100=85 cfsQ100=85 cfsQ100=4cfs Q100=29 cfs Q 1 0 0 =8 cfsQ 1 0 0 =3 7 c fs Q100=49cfsQ100=13 cfsQ100=51 cfs Q 1 00=2 6 5cfsQ100=33 cf sQ100=188 cfsQ100=29 cfsQ 1 0 0=2 2 1 cfsQ100=33 cfsQ100=73 cfsQ 100=46 cfsQ100=35 cfsQ100=70 cfsQ100=478 cfsQ100=397 cfsQ100=61 cfsQ1 0 0 = 1 4 cf s Q100=9 cfsQ100=10 cfsQ100=15 cf sQ100=19 cfs Q100=11cfs Q100=172 cfsQ100=182 cfsQ100=174 cf sQ 1 0 0 =16 7 cfsQ100=204 cfs Q100=79 cfs Q 1 0 0 =3 3 c fs Q100=122 cfs Q100=77 cfsQ100=47 cfsQover=16 cfsQover=10cfsQover=41cfs Qover=10cfsQover=5cfs Qover=51 cfsQover=19 cfsQ o v e r = 2 8 cfs Q over=54 cfs Qover=75cfs LC-034206.6 Ac LC-0268.4 Ac LC-0296.6 Ac LC-P0717.6 Ac LC-P1415.8 Ac LC-P199.1 Ac LC-P0916.9 Ac LC-0327.0 Ac LC-P176.5 Ac LC-P1115.7 Ac LC-0863.9 Ac LC-P109.8 Ac LC-0843.3 Ac LC -07 71.4 A c LC-P187.7 Ac LC-05711.2 Ac LC-0754.1 Ac LC-06113.7 Ac LC-0539.7 Ac LC-P136.7 Ac LC-04916.2 Ac LC-0716.4 Ac LC-0457.8 Ac LC-0731.3 Ac LC-P126.9 Ac LC-1105.1 Ac LC-03910.2 Ac LC-0363.0 Ac LC-10313.7 Ac LC-1051.5 Ac LC-0412.3 Ac LC-0439.3 Ac LC-0677.8 Ac LC-0695.7 Ac LC-P159.6 Ac LC-1084.9 AcSB-0891.6 Ac FR-P 278.9 Ac FR-P039.0 Ac FR-06421.6 Ac FR-P3415.1 Ac FR-P2011.5 Ac SB-2832.6 Ac SB-2845.9 Ac FR-02415.4 Ac FR-1063.1 Ac FR-P199.4 Ac FR-P305.0 Ac FR-P333.5 Ac SB-075279.8 Ac SB-P1914.5 Ac SB-P2121.3 Ac SB-P1217.2 Ac SB-10639.9 Ac SB-08110.2 Ac SB-02216.7 Ac SB-0535.7 Ac SB-P112.8 AcSB-P101.5 Ac SB-P139.9 Ac SB-05710.8 Ac SB-04917.8 Ac SB-0476.0 Ac SB-0511.4 A c SB-020157.3 Ac SB-0397.3 Ac SB-0411.6 Ac SB-0442.4 Ac SB-0351.0 Ac SB-0646.6 Ac SB-P158.6 Ac SB-P1410.3 Ac MB-P018.9 Ac MB-P029.4 Ac SB-0671.2 Ac SB-0693.5 Ac SB-1044.6 Ac SB-0971.6 Ac SB-0823.8 Ac SB-O-05 SB-O-06 SB-O-08 SB-O-11 LC-O-10 SB-O-10 SB-O-09 SB-O-02 FR-O-01 SB-O-04 LC-O-08 LC-O-04 LC-O-09 LC-O-06 LC-O-05 18-in18-in1 2 -in 1 2 -in 2 4 -i n12-in1 8 -in15-in15-in12-in12-in12-in 12-in12-in1 2 -i n 12-in 48-in21-in 12-in2 4 -in 12-in18-in 15-in12-in 15-in 15-in12-in12- i n15-in12-in12-in15-in48-in12-in 15-in18-in12-in12-in18-in36-in 36-in15-in24-in 12-in12-in 15-in24-in15-in15-in24-in36-in 15-in 12-in 4 8 -in 48-in12-in 18-in 15-in4 8- i n18-in15-in12-in 12-in 2 4 -in 15-in Qover=12 cfsQover=25 cfsQ o v e r=3 5 c f s Qover=76 cfsQover=26 cfsQ o v e r =2 7 c f s Qover=58 cfs Q over=87 cfsQover=107 cfs Q o v e r=1 4 c fsQover=70 cfsQover=78 cfsQover=19 cfsQover=21 cfs Qover=54 cfsQover=13 cfsQover=43 cfsQover=58 cf sQover=115 cfsQover=8 cfsQover=55 cfs Qover=74 cfsQover=65 cfsQover=4 cfsQover=159 cfsQover=53 cfsQover=5 cfsQover=180 cfsQover=23 cfsQover=64 cfs Qo v e r = 5 3 c f s Qover=94 cfs Q o v e r =3 2 c fs Q o v e r=2 0 c fsQover=32 cfsQ over=79 cfs M i l l sPond S t u b b s B a y 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B1 B2 B3 D2 C1 D1 C3 D3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I C2 Page 12 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/ "/ !*" %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9%9 %9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 GÞWX 1030 10209 9 0 970 9 6 0 950 9401040 990 990980970 9709 6 0 9 5 0 950 940 990980970 101 0 1000 10009909809 7 0 9 7 0 960970960950970 960 9 5 09 40960 9 5 0 9509409309509 4 0102010101010100010101000 990 980 980970950 940 9409 3 0 9 4 0 930940930940930980103010101000 990 9 7 0 9 6 0 960970 950960940960 930 9501030 10301030 1 0 3 0 103010201010 1010 10101000990 10001000 990 990 9909 9 0980990 980 980980 9809 8 0 980980980 9809609 7 0 970970970 970 9709709709609609609609 6 0 960960 960 9609509409 5 0 9 4 0 9 5 09509 5 0950 9409 4 0 9409409 3 09 3 0 9 3 0 930 9309301030 9 9 0 930 BROWN RD SOlive r HillWATERTOWN RD L U C E L IN E T R D e e rR u n T r L i l l i an Ln DeerRunTr ESomersetLa L o n gview C irTruffula TrColin DrDevin LaWILLOW DR NThoroughbred La White Oak CirA b in g d onW ayWILLOWDRSOLD CRYSTAL BAY RD SGolden View DrFR-P02 FR-P03 FR-P04 FR-P05 FR-P06 FR-P07 FR-P08 FR-P09 FR-P10 FR-P19 FR-P23 FR-P26 FR-P27 FR-P28 FR-P29FR-P30 FR-P32 FR-P33 FR-P34 FR-P35 FR-P36 TL-P02 TL-P06 TL-P08 TL-P09 TL-P10 TL-P19 TL-P21 TL-P51 24-in24-i n15-in15-in18-in1 2 -in 15-in 1 5-in 1 2 -in 24-in 15-in 18-in 1 8 -i n Q100=145cfs Q100=19 cfsQ100=9cfsQ100=33 cfsQ100=15cfsQ100=32 cfsQ 1 0 0 =1 8c fs Q100=26cfs Q100=55cfsQ100=4cf sQ 1 0 0 = 3 4 cfs Q100=14cfs Q 100=12cfs Q1 0 0 = 1 3 cf s Q100=23cfs Q100=86 cfsQ100=29cfsQ100=5cfsQ100=77cfsQ100=33 cfs Q100=14cfsQ100=50cfsQ100=58cfsQ100=19cfsQ 1 0 0 =7 8 c f s Q 1 0 0 =41 c f s Q100=15cfsQ100=35cfs Q100=17cfs Q100=33 cf sQ 1 0 0 = 4 6 cfs Q100=248 cfs Q100=36cfs Q100=90 cfsQ100=18cfsQ 100=47 cfsQ100=13 cfsQ100=42 cfsQ100=76cfs Q100=23 cfsQ100=143cfsQ100=86cf sQ100=6 cfs Q100=154cfs Q100=28 cfs Q100=115 cfsQ100=26 cfsQ1 0 0 = 1 5 5 c f s Q100=9cfsQ1 0 0 = 1 5 1 c fs Q100=4 cfsQ100=72 cfsQ100=157 cfsQ100=115 cfs Q100=214 cfsQ100=82 cfs Q100=5 cfsQ100=141cfsQ100=174cf sQ100=110 cfsQ100=241 cfsQ100=139 cfsQ100=38 cfsQ 1 0 0 = 1 9 cfs Q100=59 cfsQ100=25 cfsQ100=81 cfsQ 1 0 0 = 2 1 cfs Q100=280 cfsQ100=81 cfsQ 10 0=8 cf s Q100=165 cfsQ100=89 cfs Q100=233 c f s Qov e r =6c f s Qover=41cfs Qover=13 cfs Qover=27 cfsQover=62 cfsQover=62 cfsQ o ve r=5 5 c fs LL-08715.1 Ac LL-26720.8 Ac LL-19968.4 Ac LL-30512.7 Ac LL-26512.1 Ac LC-P1415.8 Ac LC-P1115.7 Ac LC -08 63.9 A c LC-0843.3 Ac LC-0363.0 Ac TL-3013.6 Ac TL-P5111.4 AcTL-1699.6 Ac TL-1951.9 Ac TL-1872.5 Ac TL-1712.9 Ac TL-1792.6 Ac TL-2984.7 Ac TL-3005.0 Ac TL-19 23.7 A c TL-1786.4 Ac TL-17623.6 Ac TL-0226.8 Ac TL-P0995.8 Ac TL-P0416.7 Ac TL-P11115.6 Ac TL-P1261.1 Ac TL-0062.8 Ac TL-2197.2 Ac TL-2166.7 Ac TL-P0210.7 Ac TL-P0616.3 Ac TL-2227.4 Ac TL-2202.6 Ac TL-P19129.2 Ac TL-P2210.3 Ac TL-1994.5 Ac TL-0437.5 Ac TL-2022.5 Ac TL-2972.6 Ac TL-1851.6 Ac TL-2182.1 Ac FR-P25121.5 Ac FR-0855.8 Ac FR-P278.9 Ac FR-08817.6 Ac FR-1181.9 Ac FR-P039.0 Ac FR-06421.6 Ac FR-P3415.1 Ac FR-02415.4 Ac FR-1063.1 Ac FR-P353.3 Ac FR-P199.4 Ac FR-P305.0 Ac FR-P296.8 Ac FR-P265.4 Ac FR-0506.5 Ac FR-P284.6 Ac FR-0564.4 Ac FR-0271.2 Ac FR-0105.6 Ac FR-P235.0 Ac FR-05210.0 Ac FR-0484.5 Ac FR-P077.8 AcFR-P0912.3 Ac FR-P3712.0 Ac FR-P023.7 Ac FR-0803.0 Ac FR-0139.4 Ac FR -03 04.3 A c FR-06614.4 Ac FR-01211.2 Ac FR-P0622.6 Ac FR-01121.0 Ac FR-P0819.3 Ac FR-1265.6 Ac FR-0680.8 Ac FR-1081.0 Ac FR-0291.1 Ac FR-P333.5 Ac FR-1007.7 AcFR-0471.3 Ac FR-09712.0 Ac FR-0925.3 Ac FR-0586.7 Ac FR-P053.5 Ac FR-0605.8 Ac FR-12316.7 Ac FR-0831.9 Ac FR-1241.4 Ac FR-O-06 FR-O-03 FR-O-02 TL-O-01 TL-O-02 FR-O-05FR-O-04 12-in 18-in12-in 12-in15-i n 15-i n21-in15-in12-in1 2 -in 12-in 12-in 18-in15-in18-in1 5 -i n15-in24-in12-in 15-in15-in18-in9.96-in 12-in12-in18-in1 8 -i n 24-in18-in12-in18-in15-in12-in15-in15-in12-in12-in15-in 18-in 12-in48-in 24-in18-in 14.04-in 2 4-in 12-i n3 6-in 24-in 24-in 15-in42-in 36-in24- i n2 4 -in 24-in12-in18-in1 8 -in 12-in24-in 18-in 15-i n 12-in 15-in36-in 8.004-in 24-in12-in60-in18-in12-in24-in15-in 12-in1 5 -i n Q o v e r =2 5 c f s Qover=80 cfsQover=13 cfs Qover=2 cfsQo v e r = 3 8 c f s Qover=10 cfsQover=1 cfsQover=76 cfsQo v e r = 2 0 c f s Qover=61 cfsQover=80 cfsQover=94 cfsQover=62 cfsQover=47 cfsQover=32 cfsQ over=12 cfsQover=13 cfsQover=152 cfs Qover=22 cfsQ over= 2 2 cfs Qover=79 cfsQover=67 cfs Qover=38 cfsQover=29 cfs Qover=71 cfs Qover=43 cfs Qover=31 cfs Qover=4 cfsQover=153 cfs Qover=30 cfsQover=15 cfs0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B2 B3 B4 D3 C2 D2 C4 D4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I C3 Page 13 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R"/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ !*" %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 )n GoWX102010101000990980 970960102010009909701030 1010 980 1 0 0 09909809601010 1 0 0 0 990 980 970 960 9 7 0 9609 5 0 9 4 0 10009909 6 0 9 5 0 10009 9 0 9 7 0960 990 9 8 0 9609909809701000 970 9 6 0 101010009 9 0990970 980970970960980960970960950980970960 9709609509 7 0960 9 6 0 950 960 9409609509 4 010101000 990980 1 0 0 0 9 9 0 1000 9 9 0 990970 970960 980970980970 980970960970960970960 9 6 0 9 5 0 9709509 6 0 950 960 950950940950 940 9 6 09 50990 980 9 9 0980 970960970 960 9 6 0 9 5 0 9 5 094 0950 9 4 0 9 4 0 9 3 0 1 0 3 0 9 9 0 97010101000 950990 9809509809701 0 0 0970 9 9 0 970 980 970 960960 9 6 095096 0 1010 1000990 9909 9 0 9 9 0 990980990 990 990 9 9 0 990 9 9 0990 990 9 9 0 980980980990 980980980 9 8 0 9 8 0 970 9809809 8 0980 980980980980 980980 980980980 9709 7 0 960 9709709 7 0 970 9 7 0 970 970 9 6 0 960950 960960950950950940940 9409309 9 0 970 940940940940 LU C E LIN E T R S h o r e lin e D r KEENE AVEEdgewoodHillsR d USHWYNO12 WOODHILL AVE LY M A N A V E DICKENSON ST O ro n o O a ks D rWoodhillRdS MITH AVE ORONO ORCHARD RD SBB-P01 BB-P02 BB-P03 BB-P04 BB-P05 BB-P06BB-P07 BB-P08 BB-P09 BB-P10 BB-P11 BB-P12 BB-P13 BB-P17 TL-P04 TL-P11 TL-P12 TL-P13 TL-P14 TL-P15 TL-P16 TL-P17 TL-P18 TL-P31 TL-P32 TL-P33 TL-P34 TL-P35 TL-P37 TL-P38 TL-P3936-in24-in3 0 -in 1 2 -in Q100=4cfsQ1 0 0 = 2 4 c f s Q 1 00=51 cfsQ100=2cfsQ100=1 cf sQ 100=12 cfsQ 1 0 0 =2 0 c fsQ100=1 cfsQ100=132 cfs Q 100=7 cfsQ100=14 cfs Q 1 0 0 =3 6cfs Q100=30 cfsQ100=7 cfsQ100=11 cfsQ100=56cfsQ 10 0 = 18 4 cfs Q100=139 cfs Q100=15cfsQ100=5 cfs Q 1 0 0 =3 5 c fs Q100=15 cfs Q100=19 cf sQ100=30 cfsQ100=141 cfsQ100=1 cfs Q100=2 cfsQ100=34 cfs Q100=10 cfsQ1 0 0 = 9 cf s Q100=132 c f s Q100=160 cfs Q100=9 cfsQ100=85 cfsQov e r =6c f s Qover=2 cfsQover=4cfsQover=64 cfsLL-19968.4 Ac LL-P4939.4 Ac TL-P0545.3 Ac TL-P2037.7 Ac TL-3063.5 Ac TL-P3917.1 Ac TL-P1413.5 Ac TL-P1614.1 Ac TL-P1515.0 Ac TL-P1315.3 Ac TL-P1717.8 AcTL-21215.8 Ac TL-P1810.9 Ac TL-P3822.5 Ac TL-P0416.7 Ac TL-P11115.6 Ac TL-P376.7 Ac TL-P3612.5 Ac TL-P354.5 Ac TL-P3416.8 Ac TL-05617.3 Ac TL-0607.7 Ac TL-P3315.6 Ac TL-25041.5 Ac TL-P3124.2 Ac TL-P3215.8 Ac TL-P1261.1 AcTL-2197.2 Ac TL-P0210.7 Ac TL-P0616.3 Ac TL-P2210.3 Ac TL-0042.5 Ac TL-0363.7 Ac TL-2531.7 Ac TL-2558.8 Ac TL-2022.5 Ac TL-2182.1 Ac BB-P0667.0 Ac BB-P117.5 Ac BB-P128.2 Ac BB-P1336.0 Ac BB-P0810.9 Ac BB-P0923.1 Ac BB-P1016.1 Ac BB-P0318.4 Ac BB-P171.7 Ac BB-P0721.2 Ac BB-P057.9 Ac BB-P0223.0 Ac BB-P0113.9 Ac BB-00128.0 Ac VOID8.7 Ac BB-P0416.5 Ac BB-0166.4 Ac BB-0176.4 Ac TL-0241.3 Ac TL-O-03 Qover=11 cfs Qo v e r =9 c f sQover=41 cfsQover=55 cfsQ o v e r =5 1 c fsQover=27 cf s1 5 -in 24-i n24-i n 12-in15-in12-in 1 8 -i n18-in12-in 1 2 -in24- i n12-in1 2 -i n 1 8 -in24-in21-in24-i n30-in 2 4 -in 12-in1 2-in48-in48-in24-in 15-in15-in12-in24- i n9.996-in36-in36-in9.996-inF e r n d a l e M a r s h 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B3 B4 B5 D4 C3 D3 C5 D5 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I C4 Page 14 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R RR R R R R R R R R R "/"/"/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 !5 )n GoWX )n 102010009709601030 1010 990 101010009909809709609509401 0 0 0 9 9 098 09 7 0 9 6 0 95 0 9 7 0960 9 4 0 1000 9 8 0 960990980970 10009909809709 7 0 9609 4 09609509809509409509409309 9 0 9809 7 0 9 9 0 9 7 0 980970 970960980 97 0 9 5 09 4 0 950940 9509409 9 0 980 9 8 0 9609 8 0 970 980970980970980970 980 960 980970980970970960950980 9 7 0 9 8 0 970 9 7 0 960970960 970 960 97 0 960 9709609709 6 0 960 950 960950960 950 950 940980 1 0 1 0 9 9 0 930 10009709409 6 0 980 950 9 8 0 930 1 0 1 0 99 0 960 980970960950950950 1 0 1 0 1000 1000100010009 8 0990970970980 9 8 0 980980980960960 9 6 0 970 97 0 970970 970 9 6 0 9 6 0 9 7 0 960960960 9 6 0 9609609609 6 0960960960 9 6 0 950960950950950950950 950 950 9 5 0 940950 9509 4 0 9301000 970 960 960960 9 5 0 940 940 940940 930L U C E L I N E T R WA Y Z A T A BLV D W S h o r e lin e D r O LD L O N G LA K E R DHerrickCir MYRTLEWOODRDBB-P19 PL-P01 PL-P02 PL-P06 PL-P07 PL-P08 PL-P10 12-in18-in18-in 18-in 18-in18-in Q100=15 cfsQ100=1cfs Q100=5 cfsQ100=3 cfsQ 1 0 0 =3 5 c f s Q100=45 cfsQover=1 cfs Q over=8cfs Qover=20 cfsQover=12cf sQover=8cfsQover=20cfsQover=36cfsLL-P5061.5 AcLL-P4939.4 Ac TL-P2037.7 Ac HA-P022.3 Ac HA-0537.5 Ac HA-0544.2 Ac HA-0396.4 Ac PL-16687.3 Ac PL-P0810.0 Ac PL-P0710.3 Ac PL-P0113.2 Ac PL-P0624.0 Ac PL-P1035.4 Ac PL-00313.4 Ac BB-P0667.0 Ac BB-P1925.9 Ac BB-P0223.0 Ac BB-P0113.9 Ac BB-00128.0 Ac VOID8.7 Ac BB-0537.0 Ac Ferndal eMarsh 12-in 12-in12 - i n12-in12-in12-in12-in12-in18- i n12-i n15-in36-in60-in36-in42-in18-in12-in15-in15-in36-in 24-in36-inQover=18 cfsQover=13 cfsQover=2 cfsL a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, B4 B5 D5 C4 D4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I C5 Page 15 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R R "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ %9 %9%9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GsWX GsWX GsWX1030102010101000990 9809509401 0 0 0 9 9 0 980 970 950 990 980 960 950 9809609509409809 7 0 960940990 980 970 960950 970960950 10009909809809709 6 095 09401040 1030 1000990990970970960950940 980 9 7 0 980970980970970 960 9 6 095 0 9 5 0 9 40940930970960930 10109401 0 0 0 9 30930 940990 990100 09809 8 0 95010401030 1 0 3 01020 9901 0 0 0 990 9909 9 0 9 9 0 970980 980 980980 980970 970970960 9609 6 0 940 950940940 930940 9409309 3 0930 930930930 970 9 3 0 No rth S horeDr N O R TH A R M D R TONKAW A RD CO RD NO 19Lake view Ct WINDJAMMERLATonkaviewCt GARDENCTWEST BRANCH RD Dahl Rd LINDEN LA ForestLake Dr WildhurstTrElmwood Ave MIN NETO NKA H GL D LAPinehurstCtTONKAVIEWLA LakeviewPkwy Loma Linda Ave FL-P03 FL-P04 FL-P05 FL-P07 FL-P08 FL-P09 NA-P0615-in18-in12-in12-in24-in Q100=29cfsQ100=17 cfsQ 100=12 cfsQ100=17cfs Q 1 0 0 =2 2 c fs Q 1 0 0 =5 cfsQ 1 0 0 =2 3cfs Q 1 0 0 = 5 6 cfs Q100=12 cfs Q100=23cfsQ100=3cfs Q100=115cfs Q100=108cfsQ100=2 cfsQ100=64 cfsQ100=103 cfs Q100=26 cfs Q100=81 cfsQ100=38cf sQ100=73 cfs Q 100=34 cfsQ100=24 cfs Q100=52 cfs Q 100=14 cfsQ1 00 =46 c f s Q100=36 cfsQ100=25cfsQ100=39cf sQ100=14 cfsQ 1 0 0 =5 2 c f s Q100=90 cfs Q100=5 cfs Q100=131 cfs Q100=17 cfs Q100=136 cf sQ100=138 cfs Q100=137 cfsQ100=69 cf sQ 1 0 0 =7 c fs Q100=17 cfs Q 1 0 0 =2 2 3 c f sQover=34cf sQ o v e r=9 cfsQover=3 cfsQ over=13 cfsQover=39cfsQover=31cfsQover=27 cfsQover=53cfsQ over=4cfs Qover=24 cfs Qover=22 cfsQ over=31 cfs Qover=42cfsS B -0 7 5279.8 A c F L -09 0201.8 A c F L -P 07316.2 A c FL -0 3 23.7 A c F L -P 0226.3 A c F L -P 0328.7 A c F L -08 45.4 A c F L -08 626.4 A c F L -0 2 31.5 A c F L -01 87.3 A c F L -01 67.9 A c FL -0 0813.9 A c F L -02 84.5 A c F L -P 043.0 A c F L -03 93.6 A c F L -01 73.1 A c F L -02 53.6 A c F L -04 44.5 A c F L -08 218.9 A c F L -04 09.0 A c F L -P 0520.3 A c F L -P 0831.7 A c F L -P 0935.1 A c F L -09 29.4 A c FL-0 741.4 A c F L -07 51.9 A c F L -07 23.0 A c FL-1021.0 A c F L -07 836.1 A c F L -10 03.9 A c F L -05 95.6 A c F L -05 63.5 A c F L -05 33.5 A c F L -03 07.6 A c FL-0882.4 Ac F L -04 84.2 A c F L -09 54.9 A c WA -0 0 412.1 A c WA -0 0 93.1 A c WA -0 113.6 A c W A -01 52.6 A c N A -0 6 5469.1 A c N A -P 0 62.7 A c N A -0 4 23.3 A c N A -0 3 74.6 A c N A -P 0 510.6 A c N A -0 3 92.5 A c N A -0 8 05.3 A c N A -0 0 76.0 A c N A -0 114.0 A c N A -0 1 32.4 A cNA-0 0 93.5 A c N A -0 0 49.2 A c N A -0 5 65.1 A c F L -07 15.3 A c F L -09 82.6 A c FL -0461.5 A c FL-O-03 NA-O-03 FL-O-02 WA-O-01 FL-O-01 Q o v e r =1 7 c fsQover=24 cfsQover=9 cfs Qover=31 cfsQov e r =37 c f sQover=30 cfsQover=31 cfs Q over=34 cfs Qover=4 cfs Qover=65 cfsQover=19 cfsQ o v e r =1 3 0 c f s Q o v e r =3 9 c f s Q o v e r=3 9 c fs Q o v e r =3 5 c f s Q over=33 cfsQover=75 cfsQover=35 cfsQover=40 cfsQover=13 cfsQover=23 cfs12-in18-i n2 4 -in 18-in 12-in1 2 -in18-in12-in15-in12-in12-in12-in 15-in12-in24-in24-i n12-in12-in 24-in 21-in15-in 21-in 18-in12-in24-in12-in15- i n12-in1 8-in 24-in24-in 24-in21-in 18-in 15-in12-in2 4 -i n 21-in 15-in 48-in 2 4 -i n 2 1 -in 24-in15-in21-in18-in 18-in18-in21-in 18-in24-in18-in15-in 1 8 -in 18-in15-in 15-inF o r e s t L a k e S t u b b s B a y N o r t h A r m W e s t A r m 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, C1 C2 E1 D2 E2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I D1 Page 16 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R RR RRR "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 GÞWX G½WX 990 980 9 6 0 950 9409809609509 4 0 1 0 0 0 9909809709 8 0 970 9709609 5 0 9609509 4 0 9 9 0980 980 9 7 0 9509409 5 0940 970 960 9409301010 930 990 970 93 0 1 0 0 0 960940 9309909 8 0 9 8 0 980 9 8 0 970 9 7 0 970 9 6 0 9509 6 0 9 5 0 9 5 0 9 5 0 940940940940 9409409 4 0 9 4 0 9 4 0 9409 3 0 940930 9 3 0970930 T ONKAWARDFox St PartenwoodRdFARVIEW LAMB-P02 MB-P03 MB-P04 SB-P16SB-P17 SB-P18 12-inQ100=24 cfs Q100=9cfsQ100=62cfs Q100=5cfs Q100=154cfs Q100=24cf sQ 1 0 0 =3 1cfs Q100=11cfsQ 1 0 0 =5 6cfs Q100=28cfs Q1 0 0 = 1 5 c f s Q 100= 25 cfs Q100=58 cfs Q 1 0 0 =1 7 c fs Q100=37 cfs Q100=4 cfsQ100=4 cfsQ100=11 cfs Q 100=28cfsQ100=107 cfsQover=16cfsFR-P199.4 Ac FR-P305.0 Ac FR -07 24.2 A c SB-075279.8 Ac SB-0723.6 AcSB-P187.0 Ac SB-0646.6 Ac SB-P162.5 Ac SB-P158.6 Ac SB-P1410.3 Ac SB-0761.1 Ac SB-0863.4 Ac CY-P039.2 Ac CY-P049.0 Ac NA-065469.1 Ac NA-P 062.7 Ac NA-0305.0 Ac NA-0341.7 Ac NA-0324.3 Ac MB-0102.4 Ac MB-016463.9 Ac MB-P018.9 Ac MB-P029.4 Ac MB-0217.4 Ac MB-0116.6 Ac MB-0066.0 Ac MB-P033.6 Ac MB-03416.9 Ac MB-P0417.5 Ac MB-P0617.3 Ac MB-0372.4 AcMB-0172.5 Ac SB-O-04 MB-O-01 Q o v e r =2 0 c f s Q o v e r =2 5 c f s Qover=45 cfsQover=13 cfsQover=54 cfs Qover=2 cfsQover=30 cfsQ o v e r=3 9 c fs12-in 1 2 -i n 24-in15-in15-in12-in15-in15-in15-in12-in 12-in1 5-in 1 2 -in 15-in18-in 15-in12-inS t u b b s B a y M a x w e l l B a y N o r t h A r m L a k eMinn e t o n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, C1 C2 C3 E2 D1 E1 D3 E3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I D2 Page 17 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ !*" %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9%9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 GÞWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX990970960950960950 940 97096095096 0 950 940960950970 960 950 95 0 9 4 0 9 3 0 9 6 0 95094097 0 960 960 950 9 4 0 93 0 9509 4 0 950 940 950 93 0 9509 4 0 9 5 0 94 0 950 930 950940960950950940 950940950940950940940 930 10009 8 0 930 9809 7 0 960 9509609309 3 09609 7 0 950950 9 5 0 950950 950950980 970970 9509 6 0 9 6 0 960960 960 94 0 95095095 0 9509 5 0 9 5 0 9509 5 0 9509509409409509 4 0 940 930940940940930940 9 4 0 940940940940930 9 3 0 9309 3 0 9309309309309 3 0 930930930 930 9309309609 4 0 930 930 9 3 0 BROWN RD SFrenchCreekDrFrenc h CreekCir CarriageLaGander RdARBOR STLAKEVIEW AVE W IL L O W D R S Lit t l eOrchard W ayFARVIEW LA MINNETONKA AVE Fo x St H E R I T A G E D R North Shore Dr F r e n c h L a k e R dOLD CRYSTAL BAY RD SBRIARSTSHEVLI NDRWEBBERHILLSRD CY-P03CY-P04 FR-P11 FR-P12 FR-P13 FR-P14 FR-P15 FR-P16 FR-P18 FR-P21 FR-P22 FR-P25 FR-P30 FR-P31 MB-P06 MB-P07 TL-P22 TL-P24 TL-P25 TL-P26 TL-P28 TL-P29 TL-P30 48-in15-in18-in Q 1 0 0 =3 c fs Q 100=7cfs Q100=89cfsQ100=18 cfs Q100=26 cfsQ100=88cf sQ100=45 cfsQ100=37cfs Q100=38cfs Q100=10 cfsQ100=49cfsQ100=7 cfsQ100=77 cfsQ100=66cfsQ100=26cfsQ100=283 cfs Q 10 0=6 c f sQ100=31 cfsQ 1 0 0=41cfs Q100=31cf sQ 1 00=3 7 cfsQ100=20 cf sQ 10 0 = 28 0 cfs Q100=4 cfsQ100=5 cfs Q100=4 cfsQ100=154cfs Q100=96cf sQ100=30 cfs Q100=11 cfsQ100=110 cfsQ 100=141 cfs Q100=1 cfs Q100=241 cfs Q100=298 cfs Q100=9 cfsQ100=85 cfsQ100=199 cf sQ100=41 cfsQ100=5 cfsQ100=18 cfsQ100=10 cfs Q100=11 cfsQ100=44 cfsQ100=20 cfsQ100=20 cfs Q 1 0 0 = 1 7 6 cfs Q100=41 cfsQ100=391 cf sQ1 0 0 = 3 5 c f s Q 100=1 cfsQ100=7 cfs Q100=6 cfsQ100=2 cfsQ100=116 cfs Q100=49 cfsQ100=34 cfsQ100=7 cfs Q100=28 cfs Q100=124 cfsQover=17cfsQ o v er=4cfs Qover=15cfsTL-P0616.3 A c T L -P 19129.2 A c T L -06 811.0 A c T L -23 82.3 A cTL-P 2514.0 A c T L -01 83.5 A c T L -23 944.1 A c T L -P 287.5 A c T L -P 307.0 A c TL -2 471.2 A c TL -2 4 82.1 A c T L -24 611.5 A c T L -P 2923.7 A c T L -P 2613.0 A c T L -03 15.4 A c T L -P 2210.3 A c T L -07 1114.0 A c T L -P 0 33.3 A c F R -P 2 5121.5 A c FR -P 1 99.4 A c F R-P3 05.0 Ac F R-0724.2 A c F R -P2 96.8 A c F R-P3 712.0 A cFR-0803.0 A c F R-03319.5 A c F R -P1112.0 A c F R -P1 311.0 A c F R -P1 26.0 A c F R-0775.7 Ac F R -P 1 818.4 A cFR-P 2 210.6 A c F R -P 3 16.3 A c F R -P 2 4186.4 A c F R -P 1 516.8 A c FR-1140.7 Ac F R-0139.4 A c F R-0304.3 A c F R -P 0 622.6 A c F R-0021.5 A c F R-03815.9 A c F R-0045.5 A c F R -0 4 23.6 A c F R-1213.7 A c F R -P0 12.8 A c F R-0174.3 A c F R-0465.6 A c F R -P 1 63.0 A c C Y-P 0 39.2 A c C Y-P 0 49.0 A c S B -2 5 84.8 A c S B -2 6 110.5 A c M B -0 1 6463.9 A c MB-P 029.4 A c M B -0 2 17.4 A c M B -0 191.2 A c M B-P0 73.4 A c M B-P0 617.3 A c MB-0320.8 Ac M B -0 2 92.1 A c M B -0 2 73.7 A c F R-12316.7 A c F R-15620.4 A c F R-0372.2 A c TL-2 320.9 Ac TL -2 3 03.5 A c T L -24 23.8 A c T L -24 31.5 A c FR-O-08 FR-O-07 FR-O-09Qover=80 cfsQover =144 c f s Qover=12 cfs Qover=6 cfs Q o v e r =2 5 c fsQover=20 cfsQover=41 cfs Q o v er=1 3 c fs Qover=17 cfsQ over=17 cfs Q o v e r =1 0 c f s Qover=12 cfsQover=17 cfsQover=6 cfs Qover=30 cfsQover=101 cfsQover=50 cfsQover =6 cf sQ o v e r =2 5 c fsQover=62 cfsQover=9 cfs Qover=3 cfs 12-in24-in15-in18-i n1 2 -in28.8-in12-in48-in12-i n 12-in24- i n18-in1 2 -in 1 2 -i n15-in12-in18-in12-i n18-in 15-in 30-in24-in1 5 -in 18-in 24-in 15-in 15-in12-in18-in18-in15-in18-i n1 8 -i n 15-in15-in12-in 1 2 -i n 18-in 15-in 12-in12-in12-in12-in12-in15-in24-in 18-in36-in12-in15-in18-i n8.004-in 12- i n1 2 -in 12-in12- i n12-in 12-in 12-in 12-in F r e n c h L a k e S m i t hBay M a x w e l lBay L a k e M i n n e t o n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, C2 C3 C4 E3 D2 E2 D4 E4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I D3 Page 18 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMRR R R R R R R R R R R R R "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GoWX GoWX 9 9 0980 9709 6 0 9 5 0 9 4 0 970 950 9 8 097 09609 7 0 9 6 0 9409 7 0960 950940960 950 930 980 970 960 960950 9 7 0960 940930950930 950 9409 5 09 4 0 940 930 9 5 0 9409609509509409409 3 0 940930 940 930 940930 9409301000 9509 5 0 950 950950950 9 5 0 960970970 9709 7 0 960 960960960 950 9 5 0 950950 940940 930930940 9409 4 0 9 3 0 9 3 0 930930 930 9409309309309309 3 0930 93093093 0 930 93093093 0 940 940930 930 930 930 Fox St ORONOORCHARDRDSShoreline DrORONO LA FerndaleRdW Gr ee nTre e sRdMillston RdBracket t s Poi nt RdHERI TAGELABB-P10BB-P13 BB-P14 BB-P15 BB-P16 BB-P17 BB-P18 TL-P03 TL-P29 18-in 12-inQ100=10cfsQ100=9cfsQ100=21cfsQ100=15cfsQ100=6cf sQ100=17cfs Q100=26cfsQ 100=7cfsQ100=20cfs Q100=41cfsQ 1 0 0 =8 c f s Q 1 0 0 =2 7 9 c f s Q100=21 cfsQ100=6 cfsQ100=26 cfsQ100=21 cfsQ100=391 cf sQ1 0 0 = 1 7 c f s Q 1 00 =3 9 cfsQ100=127 cf sQ100=806 cfs TL-P2393.9 Ac TL-P3215.8 Ac TL-P0616.3 Ac TL-P287.5 Ac TL-P2923.7 Ac TL-P 2613.0 Ac TL-0315.4 Ac TL-P2210.3 Ac TL-0025.9 Ac TL-071114.0 Ac TL-P033.3 Ac SB-2569.6 Ac SB-10838.4 Ac SB-2573.7 AcSB-2584.8 Ac BB-P1423.3 AcBB-P154.6 Ac BB-0363.0 Ac BB-P188.6 Ac BB-P1336.0 Ac BB-P1016.1 Ac BB-0406.3 Ac VOID8.9 Ac BB-P165.9 Ac BB-P171.7 Ac BB-P0721.2 Ac BB-O-02 SM-O-01 SM-O-02 BB-O-01 1 8 -i n 3 0 -in 15.96-in30-in 18-in15-in12-in 1 8 -i n12-in12-in 24-in48-in 12-in 9.996-in 30-in Qover=39 cfs Qover=27 cfs F e r n d a l eMarsh T a n a g e r L a k e S m i t h B a y B r o w n s B a y L a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, C3 C4 C5 E4 D3 E3 D5 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I D4 Page 19 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PM%9%9 10009909809709609 7 0960950 95 0 9 4 0 9 5 0 940 970960960950 960950940 940 930 9409309 5 0 9 3 0970960 9509409 5 0 9 4 0 940 930 940930 940930950 930980930 9301010 9909909 8 0 970 970 9509 5 0 9 5 0960 960 9609409 4 0 930930 930940 930930930930 930 930B r o w n sBay F e r n d a l eMarsh P e a v e y L a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet S o u r c e : C i t y o f O r o n o , H e n n e p i n C o u n t y , M n D N R , M n D O T , C4 C5 D4 E4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I D5 Page 20 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R RR R "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GsWX GsWX GsWX 1000 970960950940 9 7 0 960950980960950940950940960 9 5 0960940960 9 5 0 9 4 0 9509409709609 5 0 940 980970 980970 970 960 940930940930930 9709309 6 0 980980970 960 930950980 980970970 960 970 9 6 0 960960960950950940 930North ShoreDr WEBB STHIGHWOOD LAMAPLE PLF A G E R N E S S P O INTRDVINE PLMINNIE AVECHERRYPLH I G HW OODRDRestPointRd C H E R RY AVENORTHARMDRPARKDRRESTPOINTCIR CONCORDIA STFL-P06 WA-P01 15-in 12-in 12-in18-in12-in 15-in18-inQ100=51cfsQ100=23cfsQ100=553cfsQ100=17 cfs Q100=56cfsQ100=9cf sQ100=53 cfs Q100=14 cf sQ1 0 0 = 1 6 cfsQ100=32 cfsQ 100=32 cfsQ100=555 cfsQ100=52cf sQ100=17 cfs Q 1 0 0 =1 1 7 c f s Qover=3 cfsQover=29cfsQov er =4 c f s Qover=2cfsQover=15cfs Q o v er= 1 1 cfsQover=7 cf sQover=42 cfsFL-090201.8 Ac FL-0358.1 AcFL-0681.0 Ac WA-04030.1 Ac WA-02511.9 Ac WA-00412.1 Ac WA-0093.1 Ac WA-0113.6 Ac WA-0131.2 Ac WA-0152.6 Ac WA-0212.1 Ac WA-0182.6 Ac WA-P014.2 Ac WA-0292.4 Ac WA-0341.9 Ac WA-0362.0 Ac WA-0382.3 Ac NA-065469.1 Ac NA-P036.8 Ac NA-0191.0 Ac NA-0231.7 Ac NA-0226.3 Ac NA-0179.2 Ac NA-07813.0 Ac NA-0811.6 Ac NA-0805.3 Ac NA-0132.4 AcNA-0093.5 Ac WA-0201.1 Ac WA-0270.9 Ac NA-O-04 WA-O-04 WA-O-01 WA-O-02 Q over=13 cfsQover=11 cfsQover=9 cfs Q over= 4 7 cfs Qover=12 cfsQover=73 cfsQover=19 cfs Qover=12 cfs Qover=6 cfs Qover =21 cf sQ over=33 cfs18-in12-in15-i n12-i n15-in36-in12-in 15-in36-in12-in 1 2-in 18-in36-in1 8-in12- i n12- i n15-in18-i n15-in18-in18-in18-inF o r e s t L a k eForest L a k e F o r e s tLake N o r t hArm W e s t A r m W e s t A r m W e s t A r m 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, D1 D2 F1 E2 F2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I E1 Page 21 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMRR R R "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GsWX G½WX GsWX G½WX G½WX 9609509 4 0 9709609 5 0 9 4 0 9 5 0 9 4 0 960 9 4 0 950940 9509409 5 0 9 4 0950940960 9 5 0 9409 3 0 940 9309709609609509 5 0 9 5 0 9 5 0 930 940 9409 4 0 9 4 0 9309409409409409309 4 0 940930930930950 930 930 930 930 BIRCH LAN orthShoreDrB O H N S P O I N T L A FAGERNES S POINT RD BALDUR PARK RD Bohns Point RdCY-P02NA-P03 NA-P04 WA-P02 12-in 12-in 15-i n 15-in1 5 -i n 12-inQ100=3 cfs Q 1 0 0 =1 4 c fs Q 1 0 0 =3 2 c fs Q 100=5cfsQ 100=9 cfs Q100=14cfs Q100=10cfs Q100=35 cfs Q100=4cfsQ100=14 cfsQ100=7cfs Q 1 0 0 =1 7 c fs Q 1 0 0 =2 0 c f s Q100=47 cfsQov er =12c f s Qover=4cfsQover=2 cfsQover=15 cfsQover =16 cf sQover=4cfsQover=19 cfs Qover=12 cfsQov e r =4c f sQov er =12 cf sWA-04030.1 Ac WA-P0226.4 Ac WA-0453.0 Ac WA-0414.7 Ac CY-0091.3 Ac CY-0111.4 Ac CY-0231.8 Ac CY-0291.9 Ac CY-0322.7 Ac CY-0331.6 Ac CY-P026.7 Ac CY-0493.3 Ac CY-0026.1 Ac CY-0551.8 AcCY-0510.9 Ac NA-065469.1 Ac NA-P036.8 Ac NA-0231.7 Ac NA-0226.3 Ac MB-016463.9 Ac WA-0432.8 Ac CY-0271.7 Ac CY-0373.0 Ac CY-0415.0 Ac CY-O-05 NA-O-05 12-in 15-in12-in12-in12- i n18-in 15-in 12-in 15- i n12-in15-in 12-in 2 4 -in24-in1 5 -in 1 2-in15-in 1 2 -in 48-in 24-in15-in 24-in1 2 -in 12-in Q over=1 cfs Qover=8 cfs Q over=2 2 cfs Q o v e r=6 c fs Q o v e r=3 3 cfs Qover=12 cfsM a x w e l l B a y N o r t h A r m L a k eMinneto n k a C r y s t a l B a y W e s t A r m 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, D1 D2 D3 F2 E1 F1 E3 F3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I E2 Page 22 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R RR R R "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 G½WX GoWX GoWX G½WX 980960950940970 950 940970950940 950940970 960 9 6 0 950950940 970960970 960 9509409 4 0 9 3 0 97093096 0 9309309709509 5 0 9609509509709 7 0 970970970 9 7 0 9709609609509609 5 0950950 950 950 94093093 0 930 9609 30North Shore DrFrench CreekDr BROWN RD SARBOR STRAILROAD AVEBRIAR STSpates Ave Bay Ridge RdFR-P17 FR-P18FR-P22 SB-P22 18-in 1 2-in Q100=49cfs Q100=124cfsQ 100=37 cfsQover=41 cfs Qover=37 cfs TL-P287.5 AcTL-P307.0 Ac TL-24611.5 AcFR-P1818.4 AcFR-P2210.6 Ac FR-P174.1 Ac FR-P24186.4 Ac FR-03815.9 Ac FR-0465.6 Ac SB-26226.8 Ac CY-P049.0 Ac SB-26110.5 Ac SB-P2212.4 Ac VOID15.1 Ac SB-2596.2 Ac SM-O-04 SM-O-06 SM-O-07 1 2 -i n 48-in24-in 1 2 -i n 15-in12-in12-in 12-in 12-in Q o v er=1 3 c fs Qover=28 cfsQover=9 cfs S m i t h B a y L a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, D2 D3 D4 F3 E2 F2 E4 F4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I E3 Page 23 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PM"/%9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 950940950 950950Bracketts P oi n t Rd S m i t h B a y L a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, D3 D4 D5 F4 E3 F3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I E4 Page 24 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R "/ "/"/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/ G½WX GoWX GoWX970960950 9 8 0960950940 9509409709 5 0 940 9 6 0 950 9409309 6 0 950 9 5 0 9 4 0960 940 950 930 9509409509 4 0 9509309 4 0 9 30950940970 96 0 970960950 940950940940 930 9 7 0 940 940 9509309 4 0 9 5 0940 940 9 4 0 950950 950 9 5 0 930930940930930 940 S p r i n gParkBay W e s t A r m B l a c kLake B l a c k L a k e 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, E1 E2 G1 F2 G2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I F1 Page 25 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R R R RR R R R R R R "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/"/"/"/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/"/ "/ "/"/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/"/ "/ "/ "/"/"/"/"/"/"/"/"/"/ "/"/"/"/"/"/"/"/"/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/"/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 %9 GsWX GoWX GsWX GoWX 9 8 0 970 960 950 940 9 3 0 9 6 0 9 5 0 94 0 9709509609 4 0 9 6 0 9 4 0940930 9609509609 5 0960940960950 9709 6 0 9 6 0 9 5 0 960 950 940 9 3 0 960930970960970970 9509 5 0930950 9 6 0 950 9509 3 0 9 3 0 970970970970960950 950 9 6 0 960 960960960 960960960960 960 9609 6 0 9609 5 0 9 5 0 940 950950 9 5 0 950 9 4 0 940 940 9409 4 0 930930940 9409309309309 3 0 930 9 3 0 SHADY W O O D R D Shoreline Dr ETHEL AVEFREDERICK S T CRYSTAL PL ShoreHills OLIVE AVE NAVARRE AVEBLAINE AVENAVARRELABAYVIEW PL LIVINGSTON AVE TOGO RD LYRIC AVE C R Y S TALBAYRDCascoPointRdKE N WO O D WA Y LYDIARD AVEPe n c e L a OLDBEACHRDN O R T H E R N A V E D U N W O O D Y A V E PHEASANTRDKELLY AVECARMAN STCB-P02 CB-P03 CB-P04 CB-P06 CB-P07CB-P08 CB-P09 CY-P01 LF-P01 LF-P02 LF-P03 WA-P02 12-in12-in12-i n12-in12-in15-in 12-in12-in12-in24-in18-in1 8 -in12-in15-in12-in12-in 1 8-in12-in12-in24-in1 2-in 1 8-in 12-in 12-in12-in 18-in 12-in 18-in 18-in Q100=10cfs Q 1 0 0 = 2 9 cfs Q100=32 cfs Q100=7 cfsQ100=11cfs Q100=30cfsQ 1 0 0 =5 2cfsQ100=167cf sQ100=26cfsQ100=171cfsQ100=30cfsQ100=25 cfsQ100=148cf sQ 100=7 cfs Q 1 0 0 =1 3 c f s Q100=9 cfs Q100=24 cfs Q100=16cfs Q100=29 cfsQ100=32cfsQ100=18c f sQ100=21cf sQ100=2cfsQ100=1 cfs Q100=63 cfsQ100=26 cfsQ100=9cfs Q100=48 cfs Q100=67 cfs Q100=27 cfsQ 1 0 0 = 4 0 cfs Q 1 0 0 =1 3 c fs Q100=1 cfsQ100=6 cfsQ100=15 cfs Q100=374 cfsQ 1 0 0 = 7 0 cfs Q 1 0 0 =25 cf s Q100=59 cfsQ100=189cfsQ100=46 cfs Q100=88 cfsQover=4 cfsQover=5 cfsQover=1cfsQ over=9cfsQover=31 cfsQover=25cfsQover=3cfsQover=54cfsQover=56cfsQover=25cfs Qover=26cfs Qover=23cfsLF-02147.7 Ac CB-01324.9 Ac CY-P0130.7 Ac WA-P0226.4 Ac CB-06 12.0 Ac CY-0226.6 Ac WA-0543.1 Ac WA-05319.0 Ac CB-13916.0 Ac CY-01814.4 Ac CB-0822.3 Ac CB-13 81.3 Ac CB-07 82.5 A c CB-0801.5 Ac CB-1312.9 Ac CB-1692.8 Ac CB-15 91.5 A c CB-1401.5 Ac CB-16112.6 Ac CB-1561.1 Ac CB-1471.0 Ac CB-0108.0 Ac CB-1432.9 Ac CB-14 43.1 A c CB-P0611.1 Ac CB-0851.2 Ac CB-12 91.3 A c CB-1341.0 Ac CB-0880.7 Ac CB-0922.1 Ac CB-1022.6 Ac CB-1251.2 Ac CB-10817.2 Ac CB-1052.2 Ac CB-10 94.2 A c CB-0632.9 Ac CB-1201.7 Ac CB-0692.8 Ac CB-07 52.0 A c CB-1111.3 Ac CB-1144.7 Ac CB-0651.8 Ac CB-07 47.5 Ac CB-2263.5 Ac CB-2221.6 Ac CB-2201.7 Ac CB-0061.1 AcCB-2131.6 Ac CB-P127.8 Ac CB-P095.7 Ac CB-1631.1 Ac CB-1755.2 Ac CB-1721.4 Ac CB-1731.9 Ac CB-1654.4 Ac CB-1675.0 Ac CB-2292.1 Ac CB-2317.2 Ac CB-1822.4 Ac LF-P015.4 Ac LF-0013.9 Ac VOID19.4 Ac LF-0044.0 Ac LF-0052.2 Ac LF-0073.9 Ac LF-0161.2 Ac LF-0108.9 Ac LF-0141.0 Ac LF-P0212.8 AcCB-0661.6 Ac LakeMinnet onk a CB-O-01 LF-O-01 CB-O-02 CY-O-01 CB-O-09 Qover=26 cfsQover=20 cfsQover=20 cf sQover=12 cfsQover=52 cfsQover=20 cfsQ o v e r =9 cf s Qover=9 cfsQover=17 cfsQover=7 cfs Q over=1 4 cfs Q o v e r=3 cfs Qover=30 cfsQover=20 cfsQover=18 cfsQ o v er= 8 cfs Qover=15 cfs Qover=15 cfs Q over=46 cfs Qover=15 cfsQover=13 cfsQover=29 cfsQover=9 cfsQover=2 cfs Q over=13 cfs Qover=2 cfs Q over=45 cfs1 2 -in 18-in18-in 18-in18-in 12-in12- i n12-in12-in12-in12- i n18-in 1 2 -i n 1 2-in 1 2-in 12-in1 2-in 12-in 15-in24-in24-in12-in18-in 18-in1 2 -i n 18-in 12-in18-in12-in 1 2-in 1 2-in 12-in15-in12-in12-in24-in 12-in12-in12-in 18-in 18-in12-in30-in12-in12-in 1 8-in 12-in1 2 -i n 15-in1 5 -in 12-in12-in15-in15-in12-i n12-in 12-in 15-in12-in 12-in 15-in 1 2-in 18-in1 5 -i n 12-in15- i n12-in12-in 15-in12-in 1 2-in24-in18-in12-in12-in 18-in 1 2-in 18-in24-in15- i n12-in1 2-in 12-in 12-in 30-in15-in18-in15-in 12-in 1 2 -in 15-in 12-in 15-in 12-in18-in18-inC r y s t a l B a y C a r m a n B a y C a r m a n B a y S p r i n gParkBay L a f a y e t t eBay L a f a y e t t e B a y W e s tArmWestArm 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, E1 E2 E3 G2 F1 G1 F3 G3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I F2 Page 26 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PM"/"/ GoWX 960 950 9709 6 0950 9 4 0 9 6 0 95 0 950940930950 940 950 9 4 0 9609509409 3 0 950 9309609509 5 09409 5 0 9 4 0 940 930940960 930940950 950 9 4 0 9609 7 0 9 7 0 9 7 0 960 9 6 0960960 950950950 940950 940 940940940940940 9 3 0 960 12-inQover=3cfsVOID19.4 Ac Lafay et t eBay Qover=12 cfs12-in 1 8 -in 12-in L a k eMinn e t o n k a L a k eMinneto n k a L a k eMinneto n k a L a k eMinneto n k a C a r m a nBay L a f a y e t t eBay L a f a y e t t e B a y T o n k a B a y 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, E2 E3 E4 G3 F2 G2 F4 G4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I F3 Page 27 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PM9709 6 0 950940950 9 4 0 9509409309 6 0 950970960950 940 950940950940960950950940950940940930 9 5 0 9309 4 0 9 5 0 9609609 6 0 950 96 0 9 5 0 930 940930 9309 3 0 930 930930930930 9 3 0 L a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, E3 E4 G4 F3 G3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I F4 Page 28 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR RR 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0990 9709 6 0 9 8 0960950 950930960950990 980 9 8 0970980970970960 970960 950940950940 9809709409301 0 1 0 980970940 960940 9409 3 010101020 1 0 1 0 10101 0 1 0 10001000 1000 98098098098097 0 970 970 97096 0960960940940940 940 9409309309 3 0930 CB-2131.6 Ac L a k eMinneto n k a S p r i n gPark B a y B l a c kLake 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, F1 F2 G2 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I G1 Page 29 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PMR R R R "/ "/ "/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/"/ "/"/"/"/ "/ "/ "/ "/ %9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9%9 %9%9%9 %9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 %9%9%9 %9 %9 %9%9 %9%9 %9 %9 %9 !5 !5 !5 %9 %9 %9 %9 %99709609509709609509709 6 0 960 950 940960950950940950940 9 4 0930 930940 9 5 0 980980960 9 5 0 9 5 0 950950950 940 9 4 0 930 930 Casco CoveM a p leAveIVY PL CASCO AVECascoPointRd CASCO CI RCB-P01 CB-P10 CB-P11 CB-P12 12-in12- i n18-in1 2-in 12-in1 8 -in12-in12-in 12-in 12-in Q100=6 cfs Q 10 0= 3 cfsQ100=14cfsQ100=24 cfs Q 1 0 0 = 1 7cfs Q 1 00=47cfsQ100=1cf sQ 1 0 0 =1 0 c fsQ100=26cfsQ100=21 cfsQ100=25cfsQover=25 cfsQover=23 cfsQover=4 cfsQover=20 cfs Q over=13 cfsCB-01324.9 Ac CB-P117.5 Ac CB-0051.4 Ac CB-2263.5 Ac CB-2221.6 AcCB-2201.7 Ac CB-0061.1 AcCB-2131.6 Ac CB -P1 27.8 A c CB-2101.1 Ac CB-P103.4 Ac CB-2020.8 Ac CB-2001.5 Ac CB-1971.6 Ac CB-1900.7 Ac CB-1871.3 Ac CB-1881.9 Ac CB-1923.8 Ac CB-1963.3 Ac CB-1654.4 AcCB-1675.0 Ac CB-O-08 CB-O-07 CB-O-05 CB-O-04 1 8 -in 12-in1 2 -in 1 2-in 1 2 -i n1 2-in 12-in 18-in 12-in1 2 -i n 12-in 12-in18-in6-in1 2-in 12-in 12-in 12-in 12-in12-in12-in Qover=40 cfsQ o v e r =9 cf s Qover=5 cfs Q o v e r=2 cfsQover=9 cfs L a k eMinneto n k a C a r m a n B a y S p r i n gParkBay S p r i n gParkBay T o n k aBay T o n k a B a y 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, F1 F2 F3 G1 G3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I G2 Page 30 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PM"/"/ GsWX 970940930970950 960950960940960 950 940 960950960950940950940 9409309509409509409 4 0930 9609 5095 094 0940 9 3 0 940 9 3 0 940 930 9 4 0 9 3 0 940 930 940930940 930 930 9409309309 5 0 930 950 960960960960960960950950950 9509409 5 0 940940930 930930940940940930940940940940940930940940940 9 4 0 940930 940930930930 9309309 3 0 930 9 3 0930 930 930930 930930 9 3 0 930 9 3 0 9309309 3 093093012-in12-in18-in CB-01324.9 Ac L a k eMinneto n k a L a k eMinneto n k a L a k eMinneto n k a L a k eMinneto n k a L a k eMinn e t o n k a C a r m a nBay C a r m a nBayLafa y e t t eBay L a f a y e t t e B a y T o n k a B a y 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, F2 F3 F4 G2 G4 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I G3 Page 31 of 32 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4 G1 G2 G3 G4 )n )n GsWX GoWX GsWX GeWXGeWX ?ØA@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ GyWX Orono City Limits Parcels Railroad !5 Storm Manhole "/Catch Basin %9 Inlet %9 Outlet !*"Storm ControlStructure Storm Pipe Watersheds Node FloodingDepths No Flooding 0 - 1 foot 1-2 feet > 2 feet Pipe (Q / Qcap)< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 > 3 Map Document: H:\ORNO\C13114236\GIS\Exhibits\Orono_Results_Mapbook_11x17_100-yr.mxdDate Saved: 11/29/2018 5:38:45 PM9 8 0 97 0960 9 6 0 9 5 0 940930970 9 5 0 9409 3 0940930 9509409909 8 0 9 7 0 950940 950940950940950940950940 950 940 950940950 940 940930930 9 8 0 9509 6 0 9609409 3 0 9 9 0 970 960 9 6 0960960960 960 950 9 5 0950950 950 950 950950950 9 4 0 940950940930940 940940 930 9 3 0 9 3 0 930L a k eMinneto n k a 0 500Feet Source: City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDNR, MnDOT, F3 F4 G3 SURFACE WATERMANAGEMENTPLAN LOCATION MAP 100-YEAREXISTING CONDITION November 2018 Legend !I G4 Page 32 of 32 City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 52 Appendix C: Modeling Methodology City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 53 MODELING METHODOLOGY AND MAPPING 1.The general procedure used in the runoff modeling aspects of this analysis has been performed using the Sanitary and Storm Analysis (SSA) by Autodesk modeling software. The typical analysis is based on Soil Conservation Service, Technical Release No. 20 (SCS TR-20). The SCS procedure is based on a standard synthetic rainfall hydrograph, which is modified by local parameters (i.e., rainfall, soil type, time to peak flow, etc.) and is widely accepted among drainage engineers across the United States. 2.For purposes of this report, typical 24-hour rainfall events of 2.87", 4.26” and 7.29” have been chosen to analyze runoff/development interaction. These events are best described as those having probabilities of occurring once every 2, 10 and 100 years, respectively. 3.The probabilities of occurrence do not imply that a 2.87", 4.26” or 7.29” rainfall cannot occur multiple times within the same year; they simply say that a 2.87" rainfall will occur on the average once every 2 years, a 4.26" rainfall will occur on the average once every 10 years and a 7.29” rainfall will occur on the average once every 100 years. In other words, the 2-year rainfall has a 50 percent chance of occurring in any given year. Similarly, the 10-year rainfall has a 10 percent chance of occurring in any given year and the 100-year rainfall has a 1 percent chance of occurring in any given year. City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 54 Appendix D: Modeleling Results SSA Modeling Results – Available Upon Request City of Orono Surface Water Management Plan May 2018 55 Appendix E: Capital Improvement Plan As of: 1 Jun 18 Public Works - Storm Sewer CIP Project 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 Storm Watershed Deliniation and Pond Assessments 10,000$10,000$10,000$ Forest Arms Lane (w/road reconstruct)59,720$ Windjammer, Garden Lane Stormawater (w/road reconstruct)17,000$ West Lafeyete Stormwater (w/road reconstruct)25,800$ Tonka Ave (W/ road reconstruct E.Lake St. (w/road reconstruct) Lyric Avenue (w/ Road reconstruct)5,000$ Wildhurst Trail (w/ Road reconstruct)89,000$ Minnetonka Highlands (w/Road reconstruct)28,000$ Old Crystal Bay (6-112) (W/Rd Reconstruction)225,000$ Vine place (w/ Road reconstruct)1,000$ East Long Lake S (w/ Road reconstruct)77,000$ Windjamer (North Arm to End) (w/ Road reconstruct)7,200$ Lyman Avenue (w/ Road reconstruct)4,600$ Tonkaview Lane (w/ Road reconstruct)9,000$ Chevy Chase Drive (w/ Road reconstruct)17,500$ Casco Circle (w/ Road reconstruct)12,000$ East Navarre Roads (w/ Road reconstruct)20,300$ Kelley Parkway - OCB Rd to StoneBay (w/ Road reconstruct)7,200$ Dickenson Street (w/ Road reconstruct)5,700$ Glendale Drive (w/ Road reconstruct)3,400$ Orchard Park Road (w/ Road reconstruct)14,200$ Rest Point Lane (w/ Road reconstruct)2,800$ Park Lane (w/ Road reconstruct)2,900$ North Arm Drive (w/ Road reconstruct)29,900$ Willow Dr (Fox-Brown) (w/ Road reconstruct)24,200$ Long Lake Ravine Stabalization (SWMP 7)100,000$ Casco Point Park Outlet (SWMP O-1)58,000$ Casco cove Outlet (SWMP O-2)80,000$ Casco Point Park Bioretension Basin (SWMP CB-1)55,000$ South Casco Point Road Sump (SWMP CB-2)36,000$ Casco cove Bioretatnion Basin (CB-3)57,000$ Chevy Chase Stormwater Improvements (HA-1)69,200$ East Long Lake Road N Improvements (SWMP LL-1)82,000$ Cherry Place Ravine Improvement (SWMP NA-1)23,000$ 5-Year CIP Planning Period As of: 1 Jun 18 Public Works - Storm Sewer CIP Project 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 5-Year CIP Planning Period Surface Water Management Projects 150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$ Misc Storm Sewer Improvements 157,080$50,000$50,000$167,000$170,340$173,747$177,222$180,766$184,381$188,069$191,831$195,667$199,580$$205,568 $211,735 $218,087 $224,630 $231,368 $238,310 $245,459 $252,823 Pond Cleaning/Maintenance (1/year)50,000$51,500$53,045$54,636$56,275$57,964$59,703$61,494$63,339$65,239$$67,196 $69,212 $71,288 $73,427 $75,629 $77,898 $80,235 $82,642 TMDL Updates 50,000$51,000$52,020$53,060$54,122$55,204$56,308$57,434$58,583$59,755$60,950$62,169$63,412$$65,314 $67,274 $69,292 $71,371 $73,512 $75,717 $77,989 $80,329 Kelly Avenue Drainage Improvements 52,909$ Totals 743,789$449,620$434,920$329,260$480,062$431,996$438,166$444,476$450,928$457,526$464,274$471,174$478,231$488,078$498,220$508,667$519,427$530,510$541,925$553,683$565,793$ CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 3B GENERAL LAND USE PLAN Introduction 3B-2 Scope 3B-3 Basic Land Use Concepts and Principles 3B-3 Table 3B-1: Orono Population and Households 1970-2040 3B-4 Table 3B-1a: Orono Populations and HH adjusted 3B-5 Land Use Goals and Policies 3B-6 2040 Regional Development Framework 3B-12 Existing and Future Land Use Summary 3B-13 Table 3B-2: Orono Existing Land Use Summary 3B-13 Table 3B-3: Orono 2040 Planned Land Use 3B-14 Navarre Area Plan 3B-18 What Changed 3B-21 Future Development/ Staged Plan 3B-21 Table 3B-4: Planned Development Sites 3B-22 Table 3B-5: Net Density 3B-24 Table 3B-6: Planned Development by Decade 3B-24 Employment 3B-25 Figure 3B-1 Employment 3B-25 Figure 3B-2 Employment by Industry 3B-25 Historic Site Preservation Plan 3B-26 Appendices Map 3B-1 Urban and Rural Areas Map 3B-2 Existing Land Use Map 3B-2B Existing Land Use-Navarre Area Map 3B-3 Proposed Land Use Map 3B-3B Proposed Land Use Navarre Area Map 3B-4 Planned Development Sites 3B-A Navarre Area Plan CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 2 CMP PART 3B LAND USE PLAN INTRODUCTION This Land Use Plan is a refinement and restatement of the ongoing planning practices of Orono citizens. It respects and maintains the historic development patterns of the City. It continues the basic land use concepts developed by Orono Township in 1950 and it conforms to the goals established by the first organized comprehensive planning attempts in the mid 1960's. This Plan is prepared and presented for the following purposes: 1. The Land Use Plan is intended to be a management tool for City officials, City staff, and other parties involved in land development and growth management in Orono. Orono's land use plan indicates the basic location, density and types of land uses in the City that are considered to be compatible with environmental conditions and beneficial to the long term health, safety and welfare of the City and its citizens alike. 2. The Land Use Plan is intended to be a guide for future development so as to reinforce our environmental protection commitment and to ensure such development will be consistent with existing land use. This Plan is compatible with the plans of nearby cities for land use of abutting neighborhoods and for overall levels of services and facilities. 3. The Land Use Plan is intended to advise the Metropolitan Council and our municipal neighbors of Orono's planning and growth management programs. The Land Use Plan illustrates and coordinates the various goals and policies of all the elements of the Community Management Plan. 4. The Land Use Plan is intended to be used as a basis for public facilities planning. The Land Use Plan plays an important role in determining each neighborhood's ultimate population, the required capacity of public facilities, and an appropriate capital improvements program. 5. The Land Use Plan is intended to be used as the basis for developing responsible ordinances for land use management. Zoning and subdivision controls have been established and will continue to be refined to implement the intent of this Land Use Plan. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 3 SCOPE The time framework of the Land Use Plan is intended to be consistent with the regional planning period of 2020 through 2040 and with the City's permanent planning policy for rural Orono. Orono's long range land use plans call for permanent maintenance of the existing low density rural residential areas. There is to be no staged growth plan and no expansion of the existing urban service area. This commitment is particularly important to the many Orono citizens who are making private investments based upon this concept. BASIC LAND USE CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES Orono's planning programs have long recognized the development paradox, or urbanization spiral, which often results from arbitrary planning assumptions or from incomplete analysis of planning alternatives. The most striking example in Orono's situation is the documented evidence that over- extension of sanitary sewers, ostensibly to solve a pollution problem, can easily in itself cause irretrievable water quality degradation of Lake Minnetonka. Chapter 1 of this Plan outlines the “urbanization spiral”. Nutrient management technologies such as NURP ponds, alum treatments, and a wide variety of Best Management Practices provide added tools to manage runoff from rural densities. However, Orono cannot and will not rely solely on man- made systems for preserving water quality, and will not increase density to pay for stormwater management infrastructure. A principal goal of Orono's planning program is the protection of natural resources and environmental amenities, particularly the water quality of Lake Minnetonka. The Environmental Protection Plan emphasizes Orono's unique environmental position in relation to the long-term health of Lake Minnetonka. Retention of natural vegetation, light, air, and open space will be promoted. Shorelines will be protected from erosion and alteration. Water quality preservation is dependent upon effective sewage treatment programs. Urbanized areas, shoreland areas and remaining existing higher-density housing clusters within the Rural area have been or will be provided with municipal sanitary sewer to prevent discharge of untreated or insufficiently treated sewage effluent into the Lake. In the rural areas, low density land use can be safely served long- term by individual on-site sewage treatment systems. Historic development patterns have resulted in a city which is partially urban and partially rural. These two development patterns offer a variety of housing to meet residents’ lifestyle and service desires. The citizens of Orono have determined that a long range planning objective of the City is the permanent retention of the rural community. This objective is in line with the existing developed density of the area, and with the similar plans of other cities abutting the rural area. Orono is partly in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and partly outside the current MUSA. The MUSA was established by Metropolitan Council to define the extent of areas where urban services will be provided and urban scale development will occur. Urban and rural neighborhoods require differing levels of public services and facilities. The urban areas of Orono have sufficient density to require, and to financially support, municipal sewer and water CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 4 services, increased police and fire protection, public works projects and public recreational facilities. These areas have such facilities in place and in sufficient capacity to accommodate all projected urban development. The rural areas have limited density and have environmental restraints prohibiting urban density encroachments. Orono expects future development in both the urban and the rural portions of the city. The urban area is expected to have new residential infill development on the existing vacant lots and undeveloped parcels at densities consistent with the Community Management Plan. Additional of higher density housing is anticipated in the planning term to accommodate a wider range of affordability and lifecycle housing needs, overall urban density will remain relatively low. The rural area is expected to have continued infill residential development. Non-residential development will likely be limited to open space recreation. Over time, changes in national priorities, population trends, metropolitan plans and metropolitan facilities have continued to reinforce the planning and development objectives of Orono. Community leaders have consistently held firm to the quality over quantity in approving development proposals, and will continue to do so. The projected population is a direct result of Orono's environmental protection policies and is consistent with the proposed public facilities plans of Orono, the Hennepin County Public Works Department, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). Table 3B-1 illustrates Orono Population and Household growth, from 1970, projected through 2040. The most recent data supplied by the Met Council, in 2016, shows 7,691 people in 3,037 households. Table 3B-1: Orono Population, Households, and Employment 1970 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 4,429 -- 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2,950 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9,500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 1,780 2,253 2,105 2,455 2,785 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 1046 784 1,095 1,105 1,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,037 3,200 3,560 3,900 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.53 2.47 2.44 Employment 500 809 980 951 1562 1579 1700 1780 1800 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 5 Table 3B-1a illustrates the number of households need to be created based on the 2016 updated numbers. In summary, the city will need to add 523 sewered households to meet 2030 projections, and 340 households in the 2030s to meet 2040 forecasts. Table 3B-1a: Orono Households 2010 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered adjusted Forecasts) Household Year 2010 2016 2020 Est. Change from 2016 2030 Est. Change from 2016 2040 Est Change from 2030 Sewered 1780 2253 2105 -148 2,455 202 2,785 330 Unsewered 1046 784 1095 311 1105 321 1,115 10 Total City 2,826 3037 3,200 163 3,560 523 3,900 340 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement, City Utility Accounts Regional transportation plans have been revised since the 1970's to accommodate the increased traffic levels on Highway 12 through Orono and Long Lake. Environmental and social pressures have eliminated any plans for expansion of County Road 15 along the lakeshore. Orono will continue to promote and implement strategies to reroute traffic away from the lakeshore areas. Regional sewer service facilities plans were revised three decades ago in response to Orono’s plans for low-density development. The final Orono-Long Lake Interceptor is in place with a design capacity for less than 8,400 Orono residents and a limited service area. In the early 1980's, the Maple Plain Interceptor was similarly designed to provide only limited capacity for Orono. These capacity limitations are consistent with Orono's goals for the rural area. Orono's commercial and economic development has always been centered in the historic town centers. The shopping, employment, education and social needs of Orono residents have been met by commercial facilities and shopping centers located in Navarre and in surrounding communities. Promotion of duplicate facilities in Orono would tend to be uneconomic and counterproductive. Orono's housing plan is intended to accommodate all planned population growth in a wide variety of housing opportunities. New urban housing will be in a variety of forms including single family homes on scattered vacant lots throughout the sewered area; planned residential developments including mixed single family, attached townhome, and apartment dwelling units on vacant sewered parcels along Wayzata Boulevard and in the Navarre Area. Most new rural housing will be on new lots of two to five acres net dry-buildable area, all with prior approved site evaluation and proof of adequate septic system operation. In Shoreland areas previously brought into the MUSA, new low- density rural development may be provided with municipal sewers to afford the maximum level of protection for Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. Orono's comprehensive sewer policy plan is designed to provide an adequate, safe level of sewage treatment and waste water disposal for all urban and rural properties. Sewage treatment policies respect the limited regional capacity and the differing levels of service required by urban and rural CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 6 neighborhoods. Municipal sewer capacity is available for projected urban development within the existing urban service area. Orono's transportation plan is tailored to the different needs of urban and rural neighborhoods. Near the lakeshore and in some rural areas, the collector roads are relatively slow speed with circuitous alignment dictated by the hills and bays rather than by commuter preference. The urban areas are provided with a typical network of city streets connecting residential and shopping areas with each other. The rural area is gridded-off with a core system of publicly maintained collector and minor arterial streets running at regular intervals. Orono's parks and open space facilities reflect different urban and rural characteristics. In the urban area, the City provides numerous small neighborhood parks and playgrounds offering centers for neighborhood activities such as swimming, skating, softball, and soccer. In addition, three larger preserves (Casco Circle, Saga Hill, and Highwood) offer substantial "natural" areas. In the rural area, a variety of City-owned parks and preserves offer a range of active and passive recreation opportunities. Large public and quasi-public recreational facilities include Three Rivers Park District lands, several golf courses, a gun club, the Luce Line state Trail, the Dakota Rail Trail, as well as two 'big woods' Scientific and Natural Areas. LAND USE GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Land Use Plan is based upon the following goals and policies which in turn have been actively developed and fostered by Orono residents over the last 45 years. Land Use Goals 1. To reinforce Orono's environmental protection commitment, with special emphasis on the protection of Lake Minnetonka and Orono’s other lakes. 2. To maintain the historic identity and character of the separate urban and rural neighborhoods. 3. To provide appropriate places for a variety of local residential, educational, recreational, industrial and neighborhood commercial activities. 4. To protect neighborhoods from encroachment of incompatible land uses. 5. To coordinate Orono's land uses with that of neighboring communities. 6. To coordinate land uses and developed density with the financial and physical capabilities of the City. General Land Use Policies 1. The boundary between Orono's Urban and Rural Areas is fixed. Orono's Urban Area will not be strictly defined by the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary or future expansions of the MUSA boundary but will be fixed by this and the other elements of the Community Management Plan. Orono’s defined Urban and Rural Areas are best described by CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 7 the planned development types and densities. Orono’s Urban and Rural areas are depicted and fixed by Map 3B-1. 2. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) will define the areas of Orono where municipal sewers may be extended. The MUSA will include all parts of Orono's Urban Area and may include parts of Orono's Rural Area where appropriate. The MUSA boundary in Orono will define areas where sewer exists or where it may be extended to serve existing or new development, but will not define the areas where general urban services will be provided, and it will not strictly define the boundary between higher density and low-density development. 3. Orono's land use plans will be based upon environmental protection policies. Land use and development must assure the conservation, protection and preservation of sensitive environmental resources in accordance with the goals and policies of the Environmental Protection Plan. 4. Development density will be limited throughout the city to a level which will not overload the natural surface water drainage and filtration system. Urbanization increases the rate and quantity of surface runoff while decreasing the water quality. To the extent that it is practical and feasible, the City will supplement existing natural assimilation capacities with man- made ponding areas, but will not allow increases in development density beyond the defined density as a result of such supplementation. 5. The wetlands, floodplains, and marshlands of the city will be protected and preserved as wildlife habitats, as unique open spaces, and as an economically practical and effective method of flood protection and storm water runoff filtration. Wherever possible, the City will acquire open space and flowage easements for conservation of these lands. The city will not support the filling of a wetland to provide a buildable lot. 6. Protection of lake resources will allow reasonable access, use and enjoyment while preventing overcrowding and excessive encroachment. In conformance with Orono's Shoreland Management regulations, Orono will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. 7. Lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Shoreland areas, whether bluff, beach or floodplain, are sensitive environmental features with significant impact on lake water quality, aesthetic values and land use function. These same factors act to draw development which can be destructive if not properly regulated. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to limit surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clearcutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, material stone rip rap shoreline protection will be encouraged. Where determined to be feasible and practical, alternative natural methods of shoreline protection other than rip-rap will be promoted. Excavation, filling and other grade changes at or near the shoreline for the sole purpose of accommodating development will be discouraged. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 8 8. The City will work to encourage and facilitate slope stabilization measures prior to slope failures. 9. Development or alteration of floodplains will be restricted. The City will observe and administer Flood Plain regulations as required by the DNR. 10. Orono's land use plan will promote the preservation of open space, light and air. Sufficient open spaces will be provided in each neighborhood and on each lot to prevent overcrowding and to ensure adequate light, air and recreation for all residents. 11. Private ownership, maintenance and stewardship of the land, including open space and many types of improvements, is favored over public ownership as being in the best and most beneficial interests of the property owner and the public, providing for more intimate, responsive and economical land management. 12. No land owner should be denied the right to develop his land by any staged growth, land banking or no-growth policy, provided the development can be accomplished within the performance standards, policies and requirements of the Community Management Plan. 13. Future development must enhance the community. Land development should respect preserve the value of the land and the integrity, stability and beauty of the community. 14. Physical improvements required to accommodate new development must be provided by the developer. It is the policy of the City that development pays for itself, physical improvements such as roads, drainage and utilities required to accommodate new subdivisions or development should be designed, financed and installed directly by the benefited developer as a precondition to development In addition, this philosophy includes developer responsibility for special fire protection equipment or devices in the case of unusual land uses or building configurations, and/or special security services in the case of unusual public safety situations. 15. All physical improvements must conform to city standards. Physical improvements related to health, safety or community systems such as roads, pathways, drainage or utility systems will be designed, located and constructed to uniform, City-established standards to ensure proper functioning and compatibility with overall City plans. 16. Developers must dedicate lands required for public use. Land subdivision or any development that results in increased land use density, and hence increased demand for municipal services, will be expected to include public dedication of lands necessary for additional road rights of way, parks, playgrounds, trails, open space, ponds or storm water holding areas whenever such facilities are directly used by the subdivided land or required by such density increase. If the individual development's property is not conducive to public land dedication, then in lieu of lands the developer may be required to contribute funds for the municipal purchase of such CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 9 lands or the improvement of such facilities proportionate to the cumulative effect of such density increase from multiple small developments. 17. No land will be permitted to be subdivided or built upon which is held unsuitable by the City for the proposed use because of flood hazards, inadequate drainage, soil formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, unfavorable topography, inadequate water supply or sewage disposal capabilities, or any other feature likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of the future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. Urban Land Use Policies 1. The majority of Orono's urban area will be reserved for residential land use. Many urban residences will be intimately associated with the lake shoreline and will be subject to density restrictions because of sensitive environmental conditions. Medium and High Density multi- family residential uses will be limited to locations near existing shopping and transportation services, but will not be appropriate within 1,000 feet of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka except when in close proximity to the Navarre commercial area abutting CR 15 or CR 19. 2. Commercial areas will be provided for neighborhood service businesses. The primary function of Orono's commercial areas will be to provide those retail, commercial and service businesses which are directly necessary to serve Orono's urban and rural residents. Commercial development will be limited to areas where full urban services, including municipal sanitary sewer and adequate transportation are available. Commercial development of a regional nature (i.e. “big box” retail) which would increase traffic, particularly on collector streets serving low density residential development, will be discouraged. Mixed Use Residential and Commercial Development is targeted for select traditionally commercial areas to provide a healthy base of customers for these limited commercial areas. 3. Lakeshore commercial areas will be provided for public access and limited lake-user services. Orono's residents and other lake users require lake access, fishing supplies, boat service and boat repair facilities which are unique to our location on a recreational development lake. Orono's Land Use Plan will provide locations for such special-purpose businesses where appropriate from both the land use and the lakeside environmental standpoint. No use or location will be permitted to adversely affect the lake quality or the public's general usage of the lake. All lakeshore commercial is to be limited to areas where full urban services, including municipal sanitary sewer and adequate transportation are available. 4. The City will encourage private unification and coordination of the existing commercial areas. Unplanned strip commercial developments will be discouraged. Coordinated projects designed to aesthetically enhance, unify and identify the business areas will be encouraged. 5. Future industrial development will be limited to the area of the existing Orono industrial park. No other location in Orono combines the availability of transportation and public utilities with remoteness from sensitive environmental features. In addition, this land use is consistent CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 10 with Long Lake's neighboring industrial development. 6. Commercial and industrial development will not be permitted to adversely affect neighboring residential property. The location, scale and types of commercial and industrial development will be controlled so as not to encroach upon or adversely impact the primary residential land uses in Orono. Wherever possible, natural land forms or buffers will be required between different land uses. 7. Public urban services must be available for all future commercial, industrial and urban- residential development. Commercial, industrial and urban-density residential uses will be permitted only where municipal sanitary sewer, water, adequate transportation, police and fire protection services are available. 8. Urban development will utilize the capacity of existing public facilities. New land uses and development will be allowed to infill existing vacant properties within the urban service area consistent with environmental limitations and with the existing or planned capacities of water, sewer, drainage transportation and recreational facilities. New development will not be permitted to overburden these services at the expense of the existing users. 9. Land use standards will limit the impact of urban encroachment on Lake Minnetonka. Minimum lot width will space out docks and structural encroachments while increasing areas of natural vegetation. Lake use regulations promulgated by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and supplemented with City regulations if necessary will limit the number of boats per property and the amount of public waters available for private docking and boat storage. 10. Retention of natural vegetation will limit the impact of urbanization as visible from the lake. Building heights will be limited to less than the typical tree height. Minimum green belts will be provided with prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be preserved on slopes and retaining walls will be discouraged except when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened with natural vegetation. Rural Land Use Policies Orono's rural area will be reserved for permanent low-density residential land use. Orono's rolling rural area is not suitable for commercial agriculture. Likewise, the delicate balance of storm water nutrient loading vs. marshland assimilative capacity precludes expansion of the urban service area without major environmental problems for Lake Minnetonka. Therefore, the ideal land use for that portion of Orono located outside of the Urban Service Area is the planned low- density rural residential land use. Commercial and industrial uses will not be permitted in the rural area. Orono's rural area provides the opportunity for quasi- agricultural land uses. Greenhouses, orchards, small hobby farms, riding stables, and recreation areas such as large golf courses and park reserves are not possible in more crowded urban areas but they are compatible with rural residential properties. Thus, the total commercial activity of Orono is broader and more varied than if the City were all urban or all rural. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 11 Rural density is limited by natural conditions. Development of rural Orono is naturally limited by a number of conditions including wetlands, steep slopes and areas of high water table, factors which influence building locations and transportation options as well as the location and spacing of on-site sewage treatment systems which rely on soil treatment of sewage effluent. The existing rural area will not be urbanized. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan. Municipal urban services will not be extended into the rural area or across open, rural lands. Rural land uses and densities do not require urban services. Urban services are not compatible with rural land use. Extension of certain urban services, such as extensive public road maintenance or municipal sewer or water cannot be economically justified or easily provided to developments in rural areas or at rural densities. Rural development will be subject to proven on-site sewage treatment capability. Future development in the rural area will be contingent upon the developer providing prior technical evidence that the site contains sufficient suitable land for all development, an acceptable primary drainfield area, and reserved space for at least one alternate drainfield area. The zoning area requirements for rural Orono will therefore be based upon minimum areas of dry, buildable, contiguous land exclusive of roadways, wetlands, streams or areas of high water table. Rural land use densities will allow maximum retention of private woods and open space. Low rural densities will accommodate home-sites without affecting the traditional vistas of open fields and woods. The retention of these woodlands and marshlands will then assure permanent habitat for our wildlife. Public open space will be provided on a large-scale or Park Reserve basis, but neighborhood or mini-parks are unnecessary because of the large amount of available privately owned and maintained open space. Rural lakeshore areas within the Shoreland and within the MUSA will be provided with municipal sewer service upon request. Municipal sewer service connections will be available to new or existing residences within the designated Shoreland Overlay District and within the MUSA when requested, costs to connect will be the responsibility of the property owner. However, this policy will not preclude development of such areas using fully conforming Individual Sewage Treatment Systems. Lakeshore Residential Land Use Policies Although Orono’s lakeshore has a wide range of diversity in lot size and home size, the predominant character of Orono’s lakeshore is natural. Natural is defined in part by much of the lakeshore being historically developed as large estate lots with homes set back a substantial distance from the lakeshore, or being developed as moderate homes on moderate lots leaving substantial open space. Natural includes remnants of native forests and vegetation, protection of the lakeshore from hardcover and impervious surface encroachments. The exception to the natural lakeshore is the areas where historically small cottages were built on small lots close to the lakeshore. These cottages in many cases have been updated, remodeled or expanded into year- round homes. The key goal of the City’s Comprehensive Plan is to protect Lake Minnetonka, and other Orono CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 12 lakes and waterways which includes the preservation of the natural character of the lakeshore and the water quality of the lakes. As the demand for, and value of, lakeshore property has dramatically increased, so has the pressure to expand or replace older homes with much larger homes. This pressure has the potential to substantially alter the natural character of the lakeshore, and the more open and natural environment enjoyed by property owners along much of the lakeshore in Orono. The following policies will guide the City in addressing development on the lakeshore. 1. Lake Minnetonka shall be protected as a natural and recreational resource. 2. The natural character of the lakeshore shall be preserved, and when possible, enhanced. 3. The views and open space currently enjoyed by lakeshore property owners shall be reasonably protected. 4. The size of a house to be allowed on a lot shall be determined, in part, based on the size of the lot, as well as on the shape and topography of the lot. 5. The increase in massing of structures on the lakeshore shall be limited. 2040 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Accommodating future growth of the Metro Area is a concern that will require wide-ranging resources. The Metropolitan Council in 2015 adopted “Thrive MSP 2040” to provide a plan for addressing the challenges that will be faced by the Twin Cities area over the next two decades in accommodating expected growth in the region. Forecasts indicate the metro area will grow by 820,000 people between 2010 and 2040, and as the average household size continues to shrink (from 2.55 in 2010 to 2.43 by 2040) an additional 389,000 households must be accommodated. In addressing the challenges of growth, Metropolitan Council has acknowledged that a “one size fits all” approach to implementing the Regional Development Framework is not appropriate, and has designated Geographic Planning Areas to identify communities with similar types of growth. In general, Orono’s area within the MUSA boundary is designated as “Emerging Suburban Edge” and the areas outside the MUSA boundary are “Rural Residential”. Metropolitan Council has identified a set of implementation strategies for each of these categories, as well as an umbrella of strategies that will apply to all communities. Map 3C-1 outlines the Community Designations and the community responsibilities. Each local community is required to address how it will plan for its share of regional affordable housing needs for the decade 2021-2030. Metropolitan Council has apportioned the forecasted need among each of the municipalities in the 7-county metro area. Minnesota Statutes require that comprehensive plans include an implementation program that describes public programs, fiscal devices and other specific actions to be undertaken in stated sequence to implement the comprehensive plan and ensure conformity with metropolitan system plans. One required element is a housing implementation program, “…including CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 13 official controls to implement the housing element of the land use plan, which will provide sufficient existing and new housing to meet the local unit's share of the metropolitan area need for low and moderate income housing.” Orono’s share is forecasted at 154 new affordable housing units for the decade 2021- 2030. EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND USE SUMMARY Map 3B-2 depicts the existing land uses in Orono as of 2016. Table 3B-2: Orono Existing Land Use Summary, shows just over 1/3 of Orono’s total area is in open water; of the remaining 2/3 that is land area, 92% is devoted to residential, parks & open space uses, or underdeveloped. Table 3B-2: Orono Existing Land Use Summary (2016) Land Use Category Acreage % of City Rural Preserve 1,214 7.88% Rural Residential 2,677 17.38% Urban Low Density Residential 3,130 20.33% Urban Medium Density Residential 52 0.34% Urban Medium High Density Residential/ Mixed Use 102 0.66% Urban High Density Residential Island Residential 65 0.42% Commercial/ Office 54 0.35% Industrial 42 0.27% Park/Open Space 1,720 11.17% Open Water 5,241 34.03% Major Highway and Railroad 773 5.02% Undeveloped 329 2.14% TOTAL 15,399 100% Source: GIS, Existing Land Use Map CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 14 Map 3B-3 indicates the proposed land use plan of the city, identifying appropriate land uses and densities for each individual neighborhood. This land use map will form the basis for land use and zoning decisions over the next 20 years. Table 3B-3 is a summary of Orono’s Planned Land Use. Note that the Summary reflects that the planned uses are to be allowed to take effect immediately rather than being staged over a period of years, thus the 2030 and 2040 predicted acreages are the same as 2020 levels. Table 3B-3: Orono Planned Land Use Summary Land Use Category 2020 Acreage % of City 2030 Acreage % of City 2040 Acreage % of City Rural Preserve 1214 8.44% 1214 8.44% 1214 8.44% Rural Residential 2795 19.43% 2795 19.43% 2795 19.43% Island Residential 65 0.45% 65 0.45% 65 0.45% Urban Low Density Residential 2180 15.16% 2180 15.16% 2180 15.16% Urban Medium Density Residential 152 1.06% 152 1.06% 152 1.06% Urban Med-High/ Mixed Use Density Residential 82 0.57% 82 0.57% 82 0.57% Urban High Density Residential 64 0.45% 64 0.45% 64 0.45% Commercial/ Office 54 0.38% 54 0.38% 54 0.38% Industrial 42 0.29% 42 0.29% 42 0.29% Park, Recreational and Open Space 1720 11.96% 1720 11.96% 1720 11.96% Lake and Open Water 5241 36.44% 5241 36.44% 5241 36.44% Major Highway and Railway 773 5.37% 773 5.37% 773 5.37% TOTAL 14,382 100% 14,382 100% 14,382 100% Source: Proposed Land Use Map The land uses identified in Map3B-3a and Map 3B-3b are outlined in greater detail below. 1. Lakes and Open Water Areas within the city boundary of open water. The Lakes and associated watersheds are a significant influence on the quality of life and character of the City. 2. Rural Preserve (1 unit per 5 acres) The northwest corner of the City is planned for a lower density of one unit per five acres. This area has been developed to provide large lot and quasi agricultural home sites. The extension of municipal water or sewer is not intended for these areas. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single family detached structures. 3. Rural Residential (1 unit per 2 acres) This is the typical rural residential density developed and planned to be permanently self-supporting. No rural density will be allowed greater than one unit per two acres except for those residences in existing rural housing clusters that were originally developed many decades ago and in most cases have been provided with municipal sewer within the past 3 decades. New rural developments may include housing clustering when environmental and site conditions allow, provided the overall density within the development conforms to these requirements, and provided that all sewage treatment needs can be adequately met within. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single family detached structures. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 15 4. Urban Low Residential (0.5-2 units per acre) This is intended for areas that have developed in a land use pattern of lots developed many decades ago smaller than 1 acre, and have access to sanitary sewer services. These lots have a particular impact on lake water quality, and lake character and storm water management, massing, and hardcover controls are critical to the retention of this character. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single family detached structures. 5. Urban Medium Residential (3-10 units per acre) This higher density will be reserved for properties deemed by the City Council to be so uniquely situated that residential development at the prescribed density will not negatively impact surrounding land uses. Such properties must have municipal sewer and water available. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single and two family structures. 6. Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 units per acre) This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors are deemed appropriate for higher density projects. The Mixed Use Residential designation is intended for established commercial areas on higher classification transportation routes to introduce an element of higher density residential. This residential component will serve to augment the commercial uses with a near-by customer base and to provide an efficient use of land. The properties targeted for Mixed Use classification are in the Navarre area, including a number of commercially zoned properties abutting Shadywood Road, and additional commercial and residential properties abutting Shoreline Drive. This Mixed Use designation is intended to allow for the possibility of higher density multi-family residential development such as senior and assisted living, townhomes, condominiums or apartment buildings. Under the Mixed Use designation, properties currently zoned for residential use are not intended to be converted to commercial property, but existing commercial property could be converted to higher-density residential use or mixed residential-commercial uses in the same buildings. The City may also consider new zoning standards to regulate potential mixed-use projects. The City anticipates mixed use within the context of the neighborhood, and not necessarily specific to a particular parcel. Where employed, the City can envision ground level commercial services, with 2nd and 3rd level residential, though that is not the expected universal development pattern. Properties in Area E of Table 3B-4 and Map 3B-4 are the primary candidates for mixed use development, which can be both vertical or horizontal. Based on the height limit (30 feet) and the desire for commercial services to mix with residential, the City anticipates no more than 70% of Area E to convert to residential uses. 7. Urban High Density Residential (20-25 units per acre) This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors, are deemed appropriate for higher density projects. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 16 Residential dwelling units are anticipated to be provided as 4 unit townhomes, apartments, condominiums, and senior housing structures, no higher than 30 feet in defined height. 8. Island Residential (1 unit per 5 acres) The Island residential is characterized by limited access, utilities, and municipal services for properties originally developed as seasonal cabins. The Land use category is intended to preserve this land use without encouraging additional subdivision. This area is envisioned for seasonal occupancy in single family detached structures. 9. Commercial/ Office Commercial/ Office is the general land use describing 3 sub land use categories: Lakeshore Commercial, Navarre Commercial District, and Orono/ Long Lake Business District. Urban commercial development is limited to two areas which are provided with all the necessary urban services and facilities. LAKESHORE COMMERCIAL Lakeshore Commercial, restricted to lake access and lake user service businesses, including marinas, are appropriate for a lakeside community and require a lakeshore location. Special performance standards are necessary to assure protection of the lake environment. Parking, utilities, lake/ Highway access, and pedestrian circulation must be considered in siting new Lake Shore Commercial Uses. NAVARRE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. See also Urban Medium High Density Residential/ Mixed Use. The major commercial center of Orono will continue to be Navarre. This area will provide opportunity for neighborhood retail and service businesses, plus professional offices. Accessory functions such as offices and living units or limited multi-family developments will be considered appropriate in or near the Navarre commercial area. The scale and type of retail uses in a pedestrian-friendly environment is the most important development parameter for the Navarre commercial area. The City will encourage redevelopment of individual commercial sites in Navarre to allow for an expanded range of neighborhood services and local small business opportunities. The Navarre Commercial District extends along either side of Shoreline Drive from the intersection of County Roads 15 and 19 westward to the Orono-Spring Park border, and along both sides of Shadywood Road from Lyric Avenue to Lydiard Avenue. The commercial uses along these intersecting corridors are typically only one tier deep, with virtually all commercial properties abutting either Shoreline Drive or Shadywood Road. Additionally, the commercial properties are not continuous, with residential properties scattered among them, making for a somewhat fragmented business district that is spread out over a mile in length from end to end. Along these two corridors the second tier of development is typically residential. Past City planning efforts for the Navarre area have identified a number of challenges to be addressed as Navarre redevelops in the years to come: 1. High traffic volumes and the existing traffic management infrastructure result in poor pedestrian accessibility. Pedestrians have limited options for crossing CR 15 or CR 19. The Park and Ride facility location and inflexibility of bus routes (partially due to the location and configuration of the P&R lot) requires that bus patrons cross CR 15 on at least one leg CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 17 of their commute. 2. Parking availability is a limiting factor for expansion or redevelopment of existing businesses. 3. Beautification efforts are hindered by road width and right-of-way constraints as well as financial constraints. 4. Aging buildings are ripe for redevelopment yet provide low rental rates that allow local businesses to survive and thrive, reducing the incentive to redevelop. 5. There is little architectural cohesiveness among the existing buildings. 6. Compatibility of certain business uses with the closely adjacent residential neighborhood can become an issue. 7. Desire to expand pedestrian connectivity to adjoining neighborhoods and to Dakota Rail Trail. 8. Introduction of higher density mixed use (residential and commercial) development to select sites identified in the Land Use Plan. ORONO/LONG LAKE BUSINESS AREA An additional commercial area is designated along Wayzata Boulevard where the availability of transportation and utilities as well as proximity to similar commercial developments in Orono and Long Lake, make commercial use appropriate. Orono will coordinate its commercial development planning related to Wayzata Boulevard area with the City of Long Lake to ensure the Long Lake downtown area remains vital and viable, to focus retail development in a compact downtown retail area, and to prevent the extension of retail development west of Willow Drive in Orono. The retail development in the Wayzata Boulevard area will be community or neighborhood scale rather than “big box‟ regional scale development. The types of retail uses will be those that focus on providing services to the residents and businesses of Long Lake and Orono, while also drawing from the reduced traffic stream on Wayzata Boulevard resulting from opening of the new Highway 12 corridor. However, the retail development is not to draw substantial traffic from beyond Orono. The development plans for the Highway 12 area will encourage locally-owned and operated businesses that provide services to Orono and Long Lake residents. Additionally, the Highway 12 retail area will be a pedestrian-friendly area. This involves providing trails/sidewalks along the roadways providing access to the retail uses. It also involves providing public amenities that provide a sense of place and provide a gathering place for the public. Parameters for commercial use of this area are as follows: 1. The area affected is property lying between Kelley Parkway and Wayzata Boulevard, west of CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 18 Willow Drive and east of Old Crystal Bay Road. 2. Allowed uses in this area include professional offices, limited service uses, retail uses accessory to the office use, and senior and assisted living uses. 3. Access to all uses will be via Kelley Parkway. Direct access to Willow Drive, if allowed, are intended to be right-in/right-out only. There shall be no direct access points onto Wayzata Boulevard. 4. “Big box” retail uses will not be allowed within this area. 9. Park/ Recreation/ Open Space Park, Recreation, and Open Space Land Use includes public and private parks and natural areas throughout the community. The recreational facilities identified on the Land Use Plan are principally large natural or open space areas which are compatible with their Rural Area location. 10. Industrial This district provides space for industrial activities for companies that are able and willing to achieve superior standards of design and environmental protection. Industrial land uses should be restricted to areas abutting major transportation corridors and individually cited so as to minimum negative impacts on residential areas. Based on their heavy hardcover needs, industrial areas should be located further than 1,000 feet from lakes. 11. Major Highway and Railway Uses Identifies land occupied by federal or state highways and railway improvements. NAVARRE AREA PLAN In 2018, the City completed the Navarre Area Plan (NAP) with the aid of a Planning Consultant, WSB and Associates. This planning process focused on the land range vision and land use goals for the Navarre area, and to inform the Comprehensive Plan, for this update. The proposed land uses shown on Map 3B- 3 include the findings from the Navarre Area Plan. Map 3B-3a shows the Navarre area specifically. The Navarre Planning Process employed a Planning Advisory Committee (PAC), consisting of 13 members of the Navarre area community, including business owners and operators and residents. The Planning Process included three PAC meetings, an open house in January, and a Joint Work session in April. Public comment was collected via the open house, work session, on-line surveys, and the use of a social media tool, Social Pinpoint. The full report, including the appendices detailing the comments received, and the market study, are attached in Appendix 3B-A of this chapter. The NAP evaluated several factors influencing the changes in the Navarre neighborhood over the next 20 years, including the market, traffic and transportation. The goal of the PAC was to influence and guide this change toward a Navarre area that can serve as a pseudo “downtown” of Orono, while still respecting the core Orono values as a small, rural community. A market study was completed by Maxfield and Associates, tested the land use assumptions made by the land use plan. The market study was used to adjust the planned land use map from the 2030 to the 2040 CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 19 Plan. Traffic and transportation issues are a major influence on the character and change in Navarre. In 2019, Hennepin County is expected to improve the intersection of County Roads 15 and 19 (Shoreline and Shadywood Road), though these improvements are not expected to increase capacity. Capacity challenges of this section of the community are discussed in the Transportation Chapter. The findings of the Navarre Area Plan are highlighted below. Interaction with Lake Minnetonka  As part of any redevelopment proposals involving parcels on the south side of Shoreline Drive between Carman Street and Kelly Avenue, the City should work with developers to identify opportunity areas that allow for viewing, sitting, and walking near the lakeshore. Fishing or boating connections to Lake Minnetonka are not anticipated. Future Development  Cautiously consider allowing increased building heights and residential density in areas along Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road (where appropriate) to increase pedestrian traffic and encourage additional retail development.  Consider incorporating incentives into the zoning ordinance that allow for higher density in exchange for enhanced architectural features, underground parking, public amenities, plazas, open spaces, and recreation areas.  Adopt architectural and design regulations where appropriate to require pedestrian scale design. Consider regulations for maximum building setbacks, minimum window coverage, location of parking facilities, architectural materials, façade articulation, and entryways.  Review all permitted and conditional commercial uses within zoning districts along Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road to ensure that the types of desired businesses are allowed in Navarre. Types of allowable uses should focus on small scale neighborhood goods and services and avoid those that do not have a large customer draw.  Consider reduced parking requirements for businesses that provide bicycle parking.  Explore acquiring additional property for providing shared parking and periodic public gatherings for Navarre businesses.  Host a developer round table to discuss obstacles to development in Navarre. Be prepared to address those obstacles.  Consider developing a façade improvement program to encourage the revitalization of neglected commercial buildings. Revolving loan funds may keep the money working within Navarre. Transportation Improvements  Work with Hennepin County on a plan for future improvements to Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road that improves safety and mobility for pedestrians and cyclists. Consider eliminating some of the free right turns at the northwest, southwest, and southeast corners to help narrow the intersection, reduce speeds, and improve vehicle predictability. Check in with Hennepin County staff bimonthly and use the Navarre Small Area Plan PAC as the review committee for potential improvements. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 20  Explore options for adding pedestrian and streetscaping amenities with any roadway improvements such as wider sidewalks, decorative pavement, landscaping, benches, and other ornamental features.  Meet with Hennepin County transportation staff to discuss potential improvements to alternate arterials that would relieve traffic pressure on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road through Navarre. Discuss options to reduce traffic volumes on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road.  Consider plans for access and the impact of expected traffic volume on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road with any redevelopment along these roads. Work with Hennepin County on developing an access management plan for properties that may redevelop along these roadways. Shadywood Trail Connection  Continue to have discussions with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District regarding the trail connection along Shadywood Road to keep the process moving forward.  Engage with impacted property owners early to identify necessary mitigation required.  Conduct additional public engagement regarding the trail as part of the community engagement surrounding the intersection improvements. Community Events  Encourage the development of a community festival.  Consider collaboration with nearby communities on an event that incorporates multiple destinations along the trail.  Utilize the city-owned parking lot on the north side of Shoreline Drive and west of Shadywood Road as a possible location for hosting tents, bands, and vendors associated with an event.  Should the block northwest of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Lane (Maxfield Study Block 4) redevelop, that redevelop should include a space available for public gatherings such as an annual festival.  Leverage an annual festival as an opportunity to do enhanced branding for Navarre.  Explore opportunities for collaboration with the Mound farmers’ market to organize a farmers’ market along the Dakota Rail Trail in Navarre.  Consider the formation of a Navarre Business Association. Tear Downs  Review development standards applicable to single-family homes in Navarre. Review to ensure that adequate controls are in place to ensure that new development is compatible with the existing character and scale of the neighborhood, while still encouraging the redevelopment of blighted properties. Such standards could include requirements for floor area ratio, height, hardcover, architectural materials, landscaping, and accessory structures.  Proactively address blighted properties through the City’s code enforcement process so that existing homes are well maintained. Consider revisions to the City’s code enforcement process or adopting fines if non-compliance is an issue. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 21  Review its demolition and construction regulations. If the regulation updates require addition administration and monitoring by City staff, consideration should be given to increasing the demolition permit fee commensurate with the addition staffing demand. WHATS CHANGED This update of the Comprehensive Plan introduces higher residential density along Kelley Parkway and Wayzata Boulevard, lowers density for the properties adjacent to the fire station on Willow, removes residential mixed use density along Shadywood, and introduces additional properties to potential mixed use development/ redevelopment along Shoreline in Navarre. These changes are all reflected on maps 3B-3a and 3B-3b. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT/ STAGED DEVELOPMENT The City does not intend to establish a staged growth plan, limiting a property owner from the use of their land, provided the development can be accomplished within the performance standards, policies and requirements of the Community Management Plan. The City anticipates its growth to occur in the same manner has been employed over the last three decades. The majority of subdivision based growth will occur via the splitting of larger lots into subdivisions of less than 6 new building sites. Small areas of the community are conducive to higher density. These projects have served to accommodate our aging community, and provide additional housing and neighborhood options not prevalent in Orono. The City’s new residential growth within the MUSA area is expected in one of 5 primary areas, depicted on Map 3B-4 Planned Development areas, and summarized in Table 3B-4, Predicted Growth in Sewered Areas. The table predicts growth over the next 2 decades and identifies the MUSA part and the Traffic Analysis Zone impacted. Assuming development at the minimum range, the city will meet its household growth projection for 2030 and 2040. The city also maintains opportunity for property owners to provide housing to meet affordability goals. The Net Density for the sewered areas of Orono identified in Table 3B-4, is summarized for clarity on Table 3B-5. The 891 units planned to be served by sanitary sewer services over the next 20 plus years yields a net density of 4.16 units per acre. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 22 A B C D E F G H I Dumas Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)25.1 10 251 251 XXXII 921 Eisinger Flats Urban High (20-25 u/a)10 20 200 200 L 921 35.1 451 451 0 St. Thomas Prop Urban High (20-25 u/a)3.69 20 73.8 73.8 X 922 2060 Wayzata Urban High (20-25 u/a)2.51 20 50.2 50.2 X 923 6.2 124 50.2 73.8 Area C, North Fire Station Area Hwy 12 frontage Urban Medium 1.71 3 5.13 5.13 XXXIV 929 Garden Prop.Urban Medium 3.41 3 10.23 10.23 XXXIV 929 Glendale Drive Urban Medium 3.82 3 11.46 11.46 XXXIV 929 8.94 26.82 0 26.82 Area D (Sewer extension into large lot areas/ Lake protection) Urban Low Density 690 Brown Rd Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)18 0.5 9 9 XL 927 740 Brown Rd Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)3.18 0.5 1.59 1.59 XL 927 3400 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)5.26 0.5 2 2 XXXI 954 3295 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.23 0.5 2 2 XXXI 931 3345 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.69 0.5 2 2 XXXI 931 3350 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)7.12 0.5 3 3 XXXI 954 3320 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)3.06 0.5 1 1 XXXI 954 3300 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.55 0.5 2 2 XXXI 954 3280 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.95 0.5 2 2 XXXI 954 3250 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)5.31 0.5 2 2 XXXI 954 3200 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)4.12 0.5 2 2 XXXI 954 3175 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)7.49 0.5 3 3 XXXI 954 3125 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)7.44 0.5 3 3 XXXI 954 825 Old Crystal Bay Ro Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)17.61 0.5 8 8 XXXI 954 1700 Shoreline Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)20.14 0.5 10 10 XXXXVII 955 1100 Millston Rd Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)12.7 0.5 6 6 XXXXVII 955 1003 Wildhurst Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre)10 0.5 4 4 I 953 139.85 62.59 0 62.59 Name Land Use Category Net Residential Acres (NRA) Lowest Guided Density Predicted # of units (C x D) 2021-2030 Growth (Households) 2031-2040 Growth (Households) MUSA Part TAZ Zone Predicted Growth in Sewered Areas, Net Density Table 3B-4 Area D Total Area A Area A Total Area B Area B Total Area C Total CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 23 A B C D E F G H I Area E Navarre Area 3880 Shoreline (Hennepin County) Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)9.37 10 93.7 93.7 I 958 3890 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.68 10 6.8 6.8 I 958 3860 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.64 10 6.4 6.4 I 958 3850 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.78 10 7.8 7.8 I 958 3800 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.7 10 7 7 I 958 3596 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.62 10 6.2 6.2 I 958 2389 Blaine Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)1.11 10 11.1 11.1 I 958 3574 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.47 10 4.7 4.7 I 958 3572 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.31 10 3.1 3.1 I 958 3542 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.46 10 4.6 4.6 I 958 3502 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.31 10 3.1 3.1 I 958 3496 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.31 10 3.1 3.1 I 958 3480 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.15 10 1.5 1.5 I 958 3472 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.15 10 1.5 1.5 I 958 3468 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.15 10 1.5 1.5 I 958 3465 Lyric Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.62 10 6.2 6.2 I 958 3440 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.15 10 1.5 0.9 I 958 Forfiet Land Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.15 10 1.5 1.5 I 958 Forfiet Land Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.1 10 1 1 I 958 Parking Lot Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)0.86 10 8.6 8.6 I 958 2520 Shadywood Urban Medium Density (3-10 u/a)2.02 3 6.06 6.06 I 956 3770 Shoreline (Firestation) Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a)4 10 40 40 I 958 24.11 226.96 46.06 180.3 Planned Totals 214.2 891 547 344 Net Residential Acres (NRA) Lowest Guided Density Predicted Growth in Sewered Areas, Net Density Table 3B-4 (Continued) Area E Total Predicted # of units (C x D) 2021-2030 Growth (Households) 2031-2040 Growth (Households) MUSA Part TAZ ZoneNameLand Use Category CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 24 Table 3B-5 Net Density by Land Use Planned Development Area Net Residential Acres (NRA) # of units (NRA x lowest guided density) Urban Low Residential (0.5-2 u/a) 139.9 62.5 Urban Medium Residential (3-10 u/a) 11.0 32.9 Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 u/a) 47.2 471.9 Urban High Density Residential (20- 25 u/a) 16.2 324.0 Totals 214.2 891 Net Density of Sewered Growth 4.16 This Net Density of Sewered Growth is consistent with the Emerging Suburban Edge designation requiring 3-5 units per acre. 63% of the land (and 6% of the number of households) identified for future sewered growth falls within Orono’s Urban Low Density areas. Development of these areas typically follows a piecemeal pattern as individual properties split into 1-3 units, where lots can accommodate subdivision. 20% of the land (and 40% of the identified for future growth) is in the Navarre area; Due to the costs associated with redevelopment, including acquisition of multiple parcels, and the city’s conservative view of public financial aid to private sector development, it is anticipated that this growth will be slow. The balance of the predicted sewered growth will occur on the remaining larger parcels where municipal services are available currently. Table 3B-6 below illustrates that based on predicted development patterns, the City can meet its projected growth in the sewered areas. Table 3B-6 Planned Development in MUSA areas by Decade Households Year 2010 2016 2020 Est. 2030 Est. Change from 2016 2040 Est Change from 2030 Households (all city) 2826 3037 3200 3,560 523 3,900 340 Growth predicted (MUSA areas only) 547 343 Surplus (Deficit) 24 3 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement, City Utility Accounts, Table 3B-4 Based on the planned growth identified in Table 3B-4, there are no negative impacts to wastewater or transportation systems. At build out, additional water storage and/or conservation measures may be necessary in the Navarre area, as described in Chapter 4C of this Plan. CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 25 EMPLOYMENT Employment levels in the City have grown slowly, and are expected to remain static over the next two decades, as shown in Figure 3B-1 below and Table 3B-1. Figure 3B-1 Employment As illustrated in Figure 3B-2, Education services are highest employer by industry at 32% of all jobs in Orono. Retail trade is the third highest employer at 15% of jobs. The City anticipates employment growth to occur as existing businesses evolve and grow. With the exception of new commercial areas along the west side of Shadywood, the City does not anticipate the expansion of commercial areas in the city. Figure 3B-2 Employment by Industry 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2020 2030 2040 Employment 1970 -2040 CMP Part 3B. General Land Use Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 26 HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION PLAN Orono began to develop in the mid 19th Century, and many of the vestiges of early development are still present, in the form of standing buildings and structures, foundations, fence lines, roadway corridors, place names and other more subtle reminders of the past. Additionally, due to Orono’s unique location on the shores of Lake Minnetonka, prehistoric native burial mound sites are known to have existed in various locations throughout the City. Orono has long encouraged the preservation of historic sites and structures, but has never adopted a formal preservation plan. Because no formal plan has been in place, many historic properties have been lost or significantly changed as development and redevelopment progressed. The subdividing of many of the old lakeshore estate properties has typically left a stately mansion surrounded by modern high-end homes rather than formal grounds. The City is fortunate that the West Hennepin Pioneer’s Association Museum is located in neighboring Long Lake, with its members serving as an invaluable resource for helping to preserve the past. Historic Preservation Policies 1. In order to ensure that Orono’s heritage is preserved, the City will consider development of a Historic Preservation Plan. The intent of such a plan would be to establish goals, policies and local regulations resulting in preservation of historic sites, buildings, place names, corridors, etc. 2. Orono will work with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in determining whether properties proposed for development contain historically significant resources which should be preserved. )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongLak e C reekPainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6 t h A v e N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArm D r Azure RoadBrownRoadNShorelineDr H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake Road Day PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring Hill RoadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Sugar woodDrRegent s W a lkC ygnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Canterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_3B-1_UrbanRuralAreas_Parcels_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/14/2018 3:16:22 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Defined Urban and Rural AreasNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Urban and Rural Areas Defined RuralAreas Defined UrbanAreas RecreationalTrail Railroad Right-of-Way Map 3B-1 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongLak e C reekPainter Cree k Minnetonka Blvd Williston RoadLake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6 t h A v e N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NHighway 12 E Lynwood Blvd WayzataBlvd W Commerce BlvdTonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Interstate 494HighwoodDr 1 8th AveN NArm D r Azure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th Ave N Oaklan dRo a d FerndaleRoadSWoodhillRoadI nte rsta te 394 8th Ave N NS horeDr St o neRoad Rice St E W atertownRoad P a i n t e r R o a d 21 s t A v e N 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w yCounty Road 151 Ranchview Ln NLake Ave Danie ls St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrDrake Dr LakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave CarlsonPkwyDove LnFinch Ln9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake Road Day Pl 23rd Ave N County Road 83Lyric Ave Spring Hill RoadTemp le Dr Crown DrEastwoodRoad5thAveN Fox St Moline Road Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC ygnetPlW Branch Road Turner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadCountyRoad101HarborLnNBa rtlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Canterb u ryDrDonald Dr LinnerRoadDunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrNiagara Ln NVicksburg Ln NLeroy StStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_3B-2_ExistingLanduse_Parcels_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/14/2018 3:08:55 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Existing Land UseNovember 2018 Legend City Limits Wetlands Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Land Use Classes Rural Preserve(1 unit / 5 acres) RuralResidential (1unit / 2 acres) IslandResidential Urban LowDensityResidential (0.5- 2 units / acre) Urban MediumDensityResidential (3 -10 units / acre) Urban HighDensityResidential (20- 25 units / acre) Commercial /Office Industrial Park,Recreational,and OpenSpace Undeveloped Right-of-Way Map 3B-2a DickeysLake GVWX112 WayzataBlvdWWillow Dr NKelley PkwyOld Crystal Bay Road NBrownRoadNWillowView Dr Dickey L akeDrSugarwoo dDrLakeMinnetonka GVWX19 GVWX15Blaine AveNavarreLnS h a dywoodRoad Shoreline Dr N o r t h e r n A v e Crysta l Pl Lyric Av e O liveAve B a y viewPl Livingston Ave D u n w o o d y A v e Kelly Ave Inset 1 Inset 2 Inset 1 Inset 2 SpringParkBay Carman'sBay LafayetteBay CascoPoint BohnsPoint GVWX15 GVWX125 GVWX15 GVWX19 GVWX51 Blaine AveSunsetDrSpringSt ShadywoodRoad Shoreline Dr Lake RoadTuxedo BlvdNavarreLnDel Otero Ave OldBeachRoadB ro o k s L n W ils h ireBlvdInte rla chen LnDenbighRoad O ld County Road Warren Ave Shoreline Dr WPointRoadL a fa yetteRoad ParkLn N o r t h e r n A v e Crystal Pl HuntingtonP oint Road W HuntingtonPointRoadELyric Ave Olive Ave C r e s c en t StArcolaLn WArm Road BayviewPl Togo Road W Arm Dr WoodbridgeRoadC r y s ta lB ayRoadKelly Ave IslandViewDrN o rth v i e w Roa d Westwood Road Pelican PointCirCir R oad Ma n it o u R o a d Casco Ave Beach Ln Livingston Ave Lydiard AveCascoPointRoadW Poi nt D rCasco Ci r Ivy Pl P e n c e LnD u n w o o d y A v e PheasantRoadMap Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_3B-2B_ExistingLanduse_Navarre_Parcels_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/14/2018 3:09:22 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Existing Land Use - NavarreNovember 2018 Legend City Limits Wetlands Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 1,000FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Land Use Classes Rural Preserve(1 unit / 5 acres) RuralResidential (1unit / 2 acres) IslandResidential Low DensityResidential (0.5- 2 units / acre) Medium DensityResidential (2-7units / acre) High DensityResidential (7-20 units / acre) Commercial /Office Industrial Park,Recreational,and OpenSpace Undeveloped Right-of-Way Map 3B-2b )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongLak e C reekPainter Cree k Minnetonka Blvd Williston RoadLake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6 t h A v e N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NHighway 12 E Lynw ood Blvd WayzataBlvd W Commerce BlvdTonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Interstate 494HighwoodDr 1 8th AveN NArm D r Azure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th Ave N Oaklan dRo a d FerndaleRoadSWoodhillRoadI nte rsta te 394 8th Av e N NS horeDr St o neRoad Rice St E W atertownRoad P a i n t e r R o a d 21 s tA v e N 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w yCounty Road 151 Ranchview Ln NLake Ave Danie ls St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrDrake Dr LakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Av e N D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave CarlsonPkwyDove LnFinch Ln9thA v e NRid g eview DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake Road Day Pl 23rd Ave N County Road 83Lyric Ave Spring Hill RoadTemp le Dr Crow n DrEastwoodRoad5thAveN Fox St Moline Road Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC ygnetPlW Branch Road Turner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadCountyRoad101HarborLnNBa rtlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Canterb u ryDrDonald Dr LinnerRoadDunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrNiagara Ln NVicksburg Ln NLeroy StStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_3B-3_PlannedLanduse_Parcels_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/14/2018 3:10:59 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Future Land UseNovember 2018 Legend City Limits Wetlands Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Land Use Classes Rural Preserve(1 unit / 5 acres) RuralResidential (1unit / 2 acres) IslandResidential Urban LowDensityResidential (0.5- 2 units / acre) Urban MediumDensityResidential (3 -10 units / acre) Urban MediumHigh DensityResidential /Mixed Use (10 -20 units / acre) Urban HighDensityResidential (20- 25 units / acre) Commercial /Office Industrial Park,Recreational,and OpenSpace Map 3B-3a DickeysLake GVWX112 WayzataBlvdWWillow Dr NKelley PkwyOld Crystal Bay Road NBrownRoadNWillowView Dr Dickey L akeDrSugarwoo dDrLakeMinnetonka GVWX19 GVWX15Blaine AveNavarreLnS hadywoodRoad Shoreline Dr N o r t h e r n A v e Crysta l Pl Lyric Av e O liveAve B a y viewPl Livingston Ave D u n w o o d y A v e KellyAve Inset 1 Inset 2 Inset 1 Inset 2 SpringParkBay Carman'sBay LafayetteBay CascoPoint BohnsPoint GVWX15 GVWX125 GVWX15 GVWX19 GVWX51 Blaine AveSunsetDrSpringSt ShadywoodRoad Shoreline Dr Lake RoadTuxedoBlvdNavarreLnDel Otero Ave OldBeachRoadB ro o k s L n W ils h ireBlvdI nte rla chen LnDenbighRoad O ld County Road Warren Ave S horeline Dr WPointRoadL a fayetteRoad ParkLn N o r t h e r n A v e Crystal Pl HuntingtonP oint Road W HuntingtonPointRoadELyric Ave Olive Ave C r e s c en tStArcolaLn WArm Road BayviewPl Togo Road W Arm Dr WoodbridgeRoadC r y s ta lB ayRoadKelly Ave IslandViewDrN o rth v i e w Roa d Westwood Road Pelican PointCirCirR oad Ma n it o u R o a d Casco Ave Beach Ln Livingston Ave Lydiard AveCascoPointRoadW Poi nt D rCasco Ci r Ivy Pl P e n c e LnD u n w o o d y A v e PheasantRoadMap Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_3B-3B_PlannedLanduse_Navarre_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/14/2018 3:09:47 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Future Land Use - NavarreNovember 2018 Legend City Limits Wetlands Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 1,000FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Land Use Classes Rural Preserve(1 unit / 5 acres) RuralResidential (1unit / 2 acres) IslandResidential Urban LowDensityResidential (0.5- 2 units / acre) Urban MediumDensityResidential (3 -10 units / acre) Urban MediumHigh DensityResidential /Mixed Use (10 -20 units / acre) Urban HighDensityResidential (20- 25 units / acre) Commercial /Office Industrial Park,Recreational,and OpenSpace Map 3B-3b )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N Hunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave N o r t h e r n A v e 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Canterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_3B-4_PlannedDevelopmentSites_Parcels_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/14/2018 3:15:07 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Planned Development SitesNovember 2018 Development Areas Map 3B-4 A - Orchard B - Kelley Pkwy. / Wayzata Blvd.High Density / Mixed Use Sites C - Fire Station D - 2 Acre Sewered Lots E - Navarre Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Page 1 Navarre Small Area Plan Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Overview of Process .................................................................................................................... 2 Previous Planning Studies ........................................................................................................... 2 Navarre Moratorium / DSU Study – 2006 ................................................................................. 3 Comprehensive Plan Discussion – 2010 .................................................................................. 3 Navarre Community Initiative – 2011........................................................................................ 3 Hennepin County / Community Design Group – Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan 2012 ...... 3 City of Orono / Hennepin County – Street Light and Sidewalk Improvements – 2013 ............. 4 Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota – Navarre Demonstration Project 2014-2015 ................... 4 Interaction with Lake Minnetonka .................................................................................................... 5 Lake Interaction Opportunities ..................................................................................................... 5 Future Development ......................................................................................................................... 5 Market Study Considerations ....................................................................................................... 5 Commercial Market ................................................................................................................... 6 Residential Market .................................................................................................................... 7 Other Uses Considered ............................................................................................................ 7 Transportation Improvements .......................................................................................................... 7 Improvements to County Road Intersection................................................................................. 7 Arterial Capacity ........................................................................................................................... 8 Trail to Businesses Connection ....................................................................................................... 9 Shadywood Trail Connection ....................................................................................................... 9 Community Events ........................................................................................................................... 9 Existing Single-Family Housing ..................................................................................................... 10 Implementation ............................................................................................................................... 10 Interaction with Lake Minnetonka .............................................................................................. 10 Future Development ................................................................................................................... 10 Transportation Improvements .................................................................................................... 11 Shadywood Trail Connection ..................................................................................................... 11 Community Events ..................................................................................................................... 11 Tear Downs ................................................................................................................................ 12 LIST OF APPENDICES Market Study Public Engagement Traffic Information Page 2 Navarre Small Area Plan Introduction Overview of Process The Navarre Small Area Plan process began in the Fall of 2017. The Navarre area is generally located at the intersection of County Roads 19 (Shoreline Drive) and 15 (Shadywood Road). The study area (Figure 1) includes the residential area north of Shoreline Drive, south of Crystal Place, west of Bayview Place, east of the city limits, and the commercial areas along Shoreline and Shadywood Road. The Navarre area represents Orono’s historic town center. A number of planning initiatives have been done for the area over the last twenty years, however, have not been fully acted on. The intent of this plan is to develop a vision for the area to guide policy and investment decisions. The process began with a consultation with the City Council on Monday, September 11, 2017, to discuss the issues that would be evaluated as part of the plan, including: • Explore expanding the Navarre neighborhood to touch and interact with Lake Minnetonka • Develop strategies that can build on the success of the Dakota Rail Trail. • Encourage trail users to be customers of the Navarre businesses. • Examine and determine the commercial and multi-family markets for Navarre and the surrounding area to determine the appropriate development opportunities. • Design guidelines, zoning tools, and/or regulations for the remodels and tear-downs of the existing single-family homes. • Engage the residents, business owners, and elected officials to determine the feasibility of any redevelopment strategies. • Create clear redevelopment strategies for implementation. A Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) made up of fourteen Navarre area stakeholders was selected by the City Council to help guide the planning process around these topics. The first meeting of the PAC took place on Thursday, October 19, 2017 and included an overview of past planning studies and included a SWOT analysis discussion about the Navarre area. A community open house was held on Thursday, November 16, 2017 at the Long Lake Fire Station #2. The open house included several interactive activities aimed at getting feedback about what people want to see in Navarre and what they would like to change. An online engagement tool, Social Pinpoint, was also utilized to gather feedback. Social Pinpoint allowed participants to identify areas in the neighborhood where there are issues and to identify things they would like to see. Several survey questions were also collected using Social Pinpoint. Following the community open house and gathering responses from Social Pinpoint, a PAC meeting was held on Thursday, January 11, 2018 to present the findings from the community engagement. The discussion focused on the seven key issues presented to the City Council and a direction forward on each issue was determined. The draft report of this small area plan was presented to the PAC on Thursday, March 8 and to the City Council and the Planning Commission during a joint Work Session on April 9, 2018. The Navarre Small Area Plan was incorporated as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update, which was adopted on December 10, 2018. Previous Planning Studies Several planning initiatives have been undertaken for the Navarre area in recent history. The following information provides an overview of those studies since 2006 to provide context for this small area plan process. Page 3 Navarre Small Area Plan Navarre Moratorium / DSU Study – 2006 In July of 2005, the City Council imposed a moratorium on development applications for the Navarre commercial area with the intent to study the area and develop a framework to guide future investment. The City enlisted the services of Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban (DSU) to provide an analysis of the existing conditions and to conduct a workshop with business and property owners and surrounding neighbors to present an analysis of existing conditions, explain the City Council’s objectives, and facilitate a discussion about the future of the area. The discussion included a SWOT analysis of the Navarre area. Approximately 75 members of the public were in attendance. A narrative summarizing the outcomes of the workshop identified three objectives for the area: 1. Preserve the small-town atmosphere of Navarre 2. Creation of community area around the lakeshore 3. Encourage a functional, thriving business district DSU also conducted a joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting to present the workshop findings and assist the City in determining next steps for planning to support reinvestment in the Navarre area. This included a presentation of concept renderings depicting various improvements within the public right-of-way, including pedestrian amenities such as decorative sidewalk, seating areas, public art, enhanced landscaping, and signage. One concept explored the possibility of a roundabout at the intersection of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road. Comprehensive Plan Discussion – 2010 In 2010, following the completion of the City’s comprehensive plan, City staff and the City Council discussed options for updating the City’s zoning map and ordinances for properties guided for higher density or mixed use. In the case of Navarre, the discussion included the possibility of developing a Mixed-Use Overlay District; however, this was never implemented. Navarre Community Initiative – 2011 The Navarre Community Initiative (NCI) is a group formed in late 2011 made up of residents and business owners of the Navarre area intended to provide input to the City Council regarding potential improvements for the area. In addition, the intent of the group is to enhance Navarre’s quality of life with special emphasis on public safety, beautification, and preservation. The group’s work includes defining short-term and long-term projects and enlisting the support of a variety of community partners to assist in their implementation. A City staff member serves as a liaison to the committee for communication purposes between the committee and City Council. In early 2012, NCI and the City sent a letter and questionnaire to Navarre businesses soliciting their thoughts and ideas for the area. Out of 58 questionnaires, only six responses were received. In the spring of 2012, NCI presented a petition to Navarre residents, which read “Agreeing with concerns that current traffic conditions in Navarre are a clear and present danger, I support safety improvements that affect pedestrians, bikers and autos as the number one priority in our Navarre community.” The petition received approximately 200 signatures On July 16, 2012, members of NCI, city staff, and the Mayor conducted a walking tour of Navarre to identify issues and opportunities for the neighborhood. Hennepin County / Community Design Group – Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan 2012 On August 28, 2012, a group meeting was held at the Freshwater Institute as part of a series of meetings conducted by Hennepin County and Community Design Group to gather local input regarding the Hennepin County pedestrian plan and to identify issues with safe walking along county roads. Approximately 50 participants attended the meeting. The outcome of this process Page 4 Navarre Small Area Plan was a final plan that seeks to improve conditions for walking in Hennepin County so that it can become a safer, more convenient, and more enjoyable transportation choice. City of Orono / Hennepin County – Street Light and Sidewalk Improvements – 2013 The City of Orono held a series of meetings to gather input from residents and businesses regarding future planning for Navarre. Meetings took place on February 11, April 8 and June 10, 2013 at Orono City Hall. Meetings included updates on recent activities regarding Navarre as well as review of street lighting options under consideration and discussion of sidewalk issues. Hennepin County Transportation Department staff were also involved in the process to discuss potential pedestrian and traffic safety improvements currently being studied. A survey was developed that allowed residents to comment on proposed street light alternatives. Following the public participation process, the City completed a streetlight and sidewalk improvement project in the summer of 2014. In addition, Hennepin County revised their striping plan for the crosswalks in response to recommendations from the City and residents at the June 10 meeting. There were approximately 40 attendees at the February 11 meeting, 35 attendees at the April 8 meeting, and 20 attendees at the June 10 meeting. Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota – Navarre Demonstration Project 2014-2015 In collaboration with Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota, the City held two open house meetings with Navarre residents and businesses to develop ideas for a potential Active Living Demonstration project. Demonstration projects are short-term projects or pop-up events intended to show what potential permanent improvements could look like. The City held the meetings to gather feedback on what issues could be addressed as part of the demonstration project. Objectives identified as part of the meetings included traffic calming and making the area more pedestrian friendly. Ideas for projects included bringing in temporary boulevard trees, improving trail connections to businesses, and providing community gathering spaces. The City had planned to seek grant funds from Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota for the demonstration project; however, due to the timing of the resignation of the City’s Community Development Director, a grant application was not completed by the City. The NCI agreed to go forward with a scaled back version of some of the projects. Page 5 Navarre Small Area Plan Navarre Study Area Map – Figure 1 Interaction with Lake Minnetonka Lake Interaction Opportunities One of the key issues identified for this study was whether the Navarre neighborhood can be expanded to touch and interact with Lake Minnetonka. Few opportunities exist to physically connect with the lake based on the Navarre boundaries shown in Figure 1. The most logical location to provide any sort of connection would be along the south side of Shoreline Drive between Carman Street and Kelly Avenue. The PAC identified this area as possible opportunity to connect with Lake Minnetonka. Should any of these properties redevelop in the future, it is possible that development could occur in a way that provides views of the lake. Through the community engagement process, feedback was received that was overwhelmingly opposed to any active lake access, such as a public launch, in this location. Environmental concerns were cited as the primary reasons. Therefore, connections with the lake in this area should be passive and limited to views and opportunities to walk or sit near the lakeshore. If development is proposed in the future, the city should work with developers to create a public space near the lakeshore, where appropriate. When redevelopment opportunities along the Lake present themselves, the City should consider if those redevelopment could provide a possible connection for the Navarre neighborhood with Lake during the redevelopment. Future Development Market Study Considerations Maxfield Research and Consulting, LLC was hired to conduct a market study to evaluate potential development opportunities in the Navarre area. The entire market study is attached to this report as Appendix A. The scope included a review of key demographic trends, assessment of current market conditions for housing, and analysis of the current commercial market in the Lake Minnetonka area. The study identifies seven potential redevelopment areas and describes the potential land uses that could result. These land uses are an indication of what the market would support but do not Page 6 Navarre Small Area Plan necessarily represent the desires of the neighborhood. The seven redevelopment areas are identified in Figure 2. The study finds that many of the properties could accommodate a variety of different land uses given their location, access, and surrounding land uses. Recommended uses based on market demand include retail, for-sale townhomes, for-sale condominiums, senior housing, and rental housing. Market Study Map – Figure 2 Commercial Market The market study finds that Navarre and the greater Lake Minnetonka area is under-retailed. An opportunity exists to attract additional retail businesses to the Navarre area along Shoreline Drive or Shadywood Road. The market study identifies Sites #4 and #5 (see Table 29 above) as being the most attractive to retail tenants. Attracting additional retail businesses to Navarre would also Page 7 Navarre Small Area Plan be consistent with feedback received through the community engagement process, as the neighborhood desires a more robust commercial district with places to go. There is currently no market for speculative office development. Build-to-suit office development may occur for specific businesses but those decisions on site attractiveness would consider different factors than considered in this market study. Residential Market In looking at the market-supported residential uses, for-sale townhomes would likely only be supported on Site #2, due to higher land costs on the other sites. Mid-rise for-sale condominiums and rental housing could likely be supported on all of the sites. Residential densities for multi-family housing in third-tier suburbs, such as Orono, are generally in the 25 to 40 units an acre range. Increasing the number of residential units near the intersection of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road would likely increase the potential for greater pedestrian traffic and provide support for additional retail businesses. Higher residential densities also help to justify public investment in pedestrian infrastructure such as enhanced pavement, lighting, benches, decorations and landscaping. Mixed responses were received regarding the desire for higher residential density in Navarre; however, there was overwhelming support for pedestrian improvements and additional retail businesses and places to go. Generally, higher residential densities are required to justify spending on pedestrian improvements and to attract additional retail businesses. Navarre will need to consider these tradeoffs carefully when reviewing future proposals for higher density residential housing. Other Uses Considered The market for hospitality has been oversaturated and therefore a hotel is not likely to be supported at any of the identified locations. If lake access were available, a small boutique hotel could be a possibility in Navarre. Additionally, office uses will be very difficult to attract in Navarre as the office market cannot generate the rents needed to support new construction; however, an office building with a built-to-suit tenant would be an ideal use for several of the identified sites. Transportation Improvements Improvements to County Road Intersection Overwhelmingly, residents of the Navarre area find the intersection of Shoreline Drive (County Rd 15) and Shadywood Road (County Rd 19) to be dangerous and unwelcoming to pedestrians and cyclists. Traffic volumes, speeds, and the orientation of the intersection all contribute to unfavorable pedestrian conditions. Based on feedback received through the citizen engagement process, a priority for the neighborhood is to make the area more pedestrian friendly. With both of these roadways under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County, the City will need to work closely with the County to ensure that future improvements meet the needs of the neighborhood. As part of any road improvement, an objective should be to reduce speeds of motor vehicles and consider all modes of transportation. This may be achieved with lane narrowing or other optical illusions to get drivers to respond accordingly. However, since the roadway is already at capacity in terms of traffic volumes, it is unlikely that improvements will aim to drastically reduce speeds. Another objective should be to tighten up the intersection and make traffic movements for all modes of traffic more predictable. Eliminating some of the free-right turns at the northwest, southwest, and southeast corners of 15/19 intersection should be options that are considered, which would help narrow the intersection, reduce speeds, and improve vehicle predictability. Hennepin County has obtained federal funding to make safety improvements to the intersection. The project is scheduled in the County’s capital improvement plan for 2019. Hennepin County Page 8 Navarre Small Area Plan may begin community outreach in 2018. In addition to broader community engagement, utilizing the PAC from this small area plan as a focus group could provide the County a good opportunity for enhanced local input. Traffic Volumes Map – Figure 3 Arterial Capacity The segments of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road within the Navarre area would be classified as three lane undivided roadways with a capacity of 15,000 to 17,000 vehicles per day. Current and projected traffic volumes are consistent with that of a four-lane undivided roadway, as shown in Figure 4. The objective of the neighborhood to enhance pedestrian and bicycle mobility is not consistent with a common transportation goal to move as many vehicles through the area as quickly as possible. This plan supports improvements to the intersection that improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists while still reasonably accommodating vehicle traffic. The City should continue to work with Hennepin County on a plan that achieves safety improvements for pedestrians and cyclists, while also exploring improvements to other arterials in the area that could relieve some of the traffic pressure through Navarre. Page 9 Navarre Small Area Plan Figure 4 - Planning Level Urban Roadway Capacities Facility Type Daily Two-way Volume (vehicles) Shoreline Drive (County Road 15) Lower Threshold Higher Threshold Current Traffic Level 2030 Traffic Forecast Arterials Two lane undivided 10,000 12,000 N/A N/A Two lane divided or Three lane undivided 15,000 17,000 17,800 N/A Four lane undivided 18,000 22,000 18,100 Trail to Businesses Connection Shadywood Trail Connection The Dakota Rail Trail is a valuable recreation and transportation asset to the Navarre Community, spanning 13 miles through the communities of St. Bonifacius, Minnetrista, Mound, Spring Park, Minnetonka Beach, Orono, and Wayzata. As a highly-used bike and walking trail, an opportunity exists to connect trail users to the Navarre area. Presently, there is not an ideal physical connection to draw people from the trail towards the businesses and the park. At the time of this report, Hennepin County, Three Rivers Park District, and the City of Orono have discussed an unformalized agreement to fund a trail connection south of the trail along Shadywood Road to the park. This connection was also well supported throughout the community engagement process. The implementation of this trail connection should be a priority for Navarre. Additional analysis will need to be done to identify the necessary mitigation required to impacted property owners. Additional community engagement should also be done regarding the trail connection and could be done concurrently with the engagement surrounding the intersection improvements. The City of Orono should continue to have discussions with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District regarding the trail connection to keep the process moving forward. Community Events Through the community engagement process, it was found that there is a desire to create a sense of place and enhanced sense of community. One of the ways this could be achieved is through community events. Through the community engagement process, people responded favorably to the idea of an annual festival in Navarre. An annual festival would bring people to the area and create an awareness of what Navarre is. The community engagement process also revealed a desire to see enhanced branding for Navarre. The city-owned parking lot on the north side of Shoreline Drive and west of Shadywood Road provides a centralized location and public open space for an event. The enhancement of this public space to accommodate uses in addition to parking should be explored. An event could be centered around the Dakota Rail Trail and include some kind of race or walkathon. An event could be coordinated in collaboration with nearby communities and feature different attractions along the trail. In addition to an annual event, Navarre could host a regular farmers’ market in collaboration with Mound, which currently hosts a farmers’ market along the trail. Page 10 Navarre Small Area Plan The Navarre Community Initiative had developed a community event as late at 2016 which was well received. Any community event will require continued leadership from those within the community, most likely in the form of volunteer residents and area stakeholders. Community partners should consider the formation of a 501(c)3 organization should be explored for the purpose of managing an annual festival. Partnerships with the City of Orono, Hennepin County, and Three Rivers Park District could be beneficial in carrying on a successful ongoing festival. With a 501(c)3 organization, the public or agencies may donate resources or in-kind services to assist in the cost of any event, such as police or public works assistance. Existing Single-Family Housing In highly desirable areas, including the Navarre community, existing single-family homes are more frequently torn down to reconstruct newer single-family homes. In some cases, this is beneficial, as blighted properties are removed and larger homes bring in increased property value and young families. In other cases, there may be issues, such as new development being inconsistent with the existing neighborhood character and disruption during the construction. Navarre has already experienced some signs of this development pressure. As such, outreach was done regarding this topic as part of the small area plan process. Generally, people responded that their concern surrounding the tear down and rebuild of single family homes in the area is low to moderate. The top two issues identified for which there is a moderate level of concern include preservation of existing neighborhood character and the height of new development. The City should review development standards applicable to single family homes in Navarre and make sure that adequate controls are in place to ensure that new development is compatible with the existing character and scale of the neighborhood, while still encouraging redevelopment of blighted properties to occur. A proactive approach to code enforcement and property maintenance should also be taken to address properties that are deteriorating and detracting from the neighborhood. Implementation Interaction with Lake Minnetonka • As part of any redevelopment proposals involving parcels on the south side of Shoreline Drive between Carman Street and Kelly Avenue, work with developers to identify opportunity areas that allow for viewing, sitting, and walking near the lakeshore. Fishing or boating connections to Lake Minnetonka are not anticipated. Future Development • Consider allowing increased building heights and residential density in areas along Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road (where appropriate) to increase pedestrian traffic and encourage additional retail development. • Consider incorporating incentives into the zoning ordinance that allow for higher density in exchange for enhanced architectural features, underground parking, public amenities, plazas, open spaces, and recreation areas. • Adopt architectural and design regulations where appropriate to require pedestrian scale design. Consider regulations for maximum building setbacks, minimum window coverage, location of parking facilities, architectural materials, façade articulation, and entryways. • Review all permitted and conditional commercial uses within zoning districts along Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road to ensure that the types of desired businesses are allowed in Navarre. Types of allowable uses should focus on small scale neighborhood goods and services and avoid those that do not have a large customer draw. • Consider reduced parking requirements for businesses that provide bicycle parking. Page 11 Navarre Small Area Plan • Explore acquiring additional property for providing shared parking and periodic public gatherings for Navarre businesses. • Host a developer round table to discuss obstacles to development in Navarre. Be prepared to address those obstacles. • Consider developing a façade improvement program to encourage the revitalization of neglected commercial buildings. Revolving loan funds may keep the money working within Navarre. Transportation Improvements • Work with Hennepin County on a plan for future improvements to Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road that improves safety and mobility for pedestrians and cyclists. Consider eliminating some of the free right turns at the northwest, southwest, and southeast corners to help narrow the intersection, reduce speeds, and improve vehicle predictability. Check in with Hennepin County staff bimonthly and use the Navarre Small Area Plan PAC as the review committee for potential improvements. • Explore options for adding pedestrian and streetscaping amenities with any roadway improvements such as wider sidewalks, decorative pavement, landscaping, benches, and other ornamental features. • Meet with Hennepin County transportation staff to discuss potential improvements to alternate arterials that would relieve traffic pressure on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road through Navarre. Discuss options to reduce traffic volumes on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road. • Consider plans for access and the impact of expected traffic volume on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road with any redevelopment along these roads. Work with Hennepin County on developing an access management plan for properties that may redevelop along these roadways. Shadywood Trail Connection • Continue to have discussions with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District regarding the trail connection along Shadywood Road to keep the process moving forward. • Engage with impacted property owners early to identify necessary mitigation required. • Conduct additional public engagement regarding the trail as part of the community engagement surrounding the intersection improvements. Community Events • Encourage the development of a community festival. Community partners should consider forming a 501(c)3 organization to assist in fundraising and administration of a community festival. • Consider collaboration with nearby communities on an event that incorporates multiple destinations along the trail. • Utilize the city-owned parking lot on the north side of Shoreline Drive and west of Shadywood Road as a possible location for hosting tents, bands, and vendors associated with an event. • Should the block northwest of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Lane (Maxfield Study Block 4) redevelop, that redevelop should include a space available for public gatherings such as an annual festival. • Leverage an annual festival as an opportunity to do enhanced branding for Navarre. • Explore opportunities for collaboration with the Mound farmers’ market to organize a farmers’ market along the Dakota Rail Trail in Navarre. • Consider the formation of a Navarre Business Association. Page 12 Navarre Small Area Plan Tear Downs • Review development standards applicable to single-family homes in Navarre. Review to ensure that adequate controls are in place to ensure that new development is compatible with the existing character and scale of the neighborhood, while still encouraging the redevelopment of blighted properties. Such standards could include requirements for floor area ratio, height, hardcover, architectural materials, landscaping, and accessory structures. • Proactively address blighted properties through the City’s code enforcement process so that existing homes are well maintained. Consider revisions to the City’s code enforcement process or adopting fines if non-compliance is an issue. • Review its demolition and construction regulations. If the regulation updates require addition administration and monitoring by City staff, consideration should be given to increasing the demolition permit fee commensurate with the addition staffing demand. Appendix Navarre Small Area Plan LIST OF APPENDICES Market Study Public Engagement Traffic Information MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC December 19, 2017 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Zweber WSB & Associates FROM: Mr. Matt Mullins & Ms. Hannah Bonestroo Maxfield Research and Consulting, LLC. RE: Initial Market Assessment for the Navarre Small Area Plan in Orono, Minnesota _____________________________________________________________________________ Introduction/Purpose and Scope of Research This memorandum contains an initial market assessment to evaluate the potential develop- ment opportunities in Navarre neighborhood located in Orono, Minnesota. The scope of the study includes a review of key demographic trends, an assessment of current market conditions for housing, and analysis of the current commercial market in the Lake Minnetonka area. The methodology used to calculate demand in this memorandum is proprietary to Maxfield Re- search but is consistent with methodologies used by analysts throughout the housing industry. This report includes primary and secondary research. Primary research includes interviews with rental property and self-storage managers gathering data on existing and proposed rental and self-storage properties. Secondary research is credited to the source when used, and is usually data from the U.S. Census or regional planning agencies. Secondary research is always used as a basis for analysis, and is carefully reviewed in light of other factors that may impact projec- tions such as residential building permit data or migration trends. Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 2 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Navarre Trade Area Navarre is located within the City of Orono. While Orono only has a population of just over 8,000 people (Esri 2017), approximately 56,000 other people (Esri 2017) live within a 5-mile ra- dius of the site set from the intersection of Shadywood Road and Shoreline Drive. Notable communities within a five-mile radius of Navarre include: Wayzata, Mound, Shorewood, Spring Park, Long Lake, Maple Plain, Medina, Excelsior, Minnetrista, and Chanhassen. Downtown Minneapolis is only a 20-30-minute drive from Navarre via Highway 12/394. The neighborhood is located along Shoreline Drive which is utilized by around 17,600 vehicles each day (MnDOT). Navarre 1-Mile, 3-Mile, & 5-Mile Radius Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 3 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Neighborhood Analysis Navarre is a community of 342 people (Esri 2017) that covers just over 100 acres in southern Orono, MN. Orono, located in Hennepin County, has a population of 8,179 (Esri 2017). Situated on Shoreline Drive, the subject area is almost completely surrounded by Lake Minnetonka, the ninth largest lake in Minnesota and a popular attraction for boaters, sailors, and fishermen. The site is bordered to its West by Spring Park, to its South by Tonka Beach, and is about 18.5 miles away from Downtown Minneapolis. The site area consists of 230 parcels comprising of a variety of uses. Residential land uses are by far the most common type of use present representing roughly 60% of parcels and 38% of acres. There are 24 vacant parcels in Navarre of various land uses. Of special interest are 27 parcels, mostly along Shoreline Drive, which are particularly suited for redevelopment. The fol- lowing table, maps, and photos depict the site location and the surrounding land uses. Land Use Parcels Acres Land Building Total Apartments 1 0.96 $285,000 $510,000 $795,000 Commerical 26 33.60 $5,654,000 $7,441,000 $13,095,000 Common Area 6 10.39 $0 $0 $0 Residential 137 38.80 $12,703,000 $16,571,000 $29,274,000 Seasonal- Residential 8 2.50 $554,000 $801,000 $1,355,000 Townhouse 28 1.04 $672,000 $4,143,000 $4,815,000 Vacant 24 14.01 $663,000 $0 $663,000 Subtotal 230 101.3 $20,531,000 $29,466,000 $49,997,000 Source: Realist Tax, Maxfield Research & Consulting LLC TABLE 1 PARCEL SUMMARY NAVARRE Estimated Market Values Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 4 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Navarre Site Parcels Navarre Land Use by Parcel Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 5 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Navarre Site Location Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 6 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Navarre Zoning, 2017 Traffic Counts Traffic counts are provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). Traffic counts are reported as the number of vehicles expected to pass a given location on an average day of the year. This value is called the “annual average daily traffic” and are represented on traffic count or traffic volume maps. The AADT is based on a short-term traffic count, usually 48 hours, taken at the location. This count is then adjusted for the variation in traffic volume throughout the year and the average number of axles per vehicle. Short-term counts are col- lected over a three-year cycle. Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 7 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC According to MnDOT 17,600 vehicles utilize Shoreline Drive on the southern border of Navarre daily. Shadywood Road, which runs through the eastern half of Navarre, has an annual average daily traffic count of 4,900, while Sunset Drive, just west of the site, has and AADT of 2,490. The maps on the following page illustrate the drive times from the subject property and traffic counts. This information is helpful in determining a draw area for various services in the area. It is also useful to determine access to workforce as potential business operations would likely give strong consideration to commuting patterns when making location decisions. As shown, the Site can be reached within a 20 to 30-minute drive of Downtown Minneapolis. Navarre Drive Time Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 8 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Navarre Traffic Counts Population & Household Growth Trends Population and household growth trends and projections are analyzed in this section because these are key indicators of the potential demand for new housing units and additional commer- cial space in a community. We also analyze data on population age distribution, household in- come, household tenure, and household type to determine the housing and shopping needs of the local household base. Table 2 presents population and household growth trends in the Market Area from 2000 to 2022. The 2000 and 2010 population and household figures were obtained from the U.S. Cen- sus Bureau. The 2017 estimate and projection for 2022 are based on data provided by ESRI with adjustments made by Maxfield Research to reflect current year data. The following are key points from Table 2. • As of 2017, Orono is estimated to have 8,179 people. Between 2000 and 2010, the pop- ulation decreased 1.3% (-101) while the number of households increased 2.1% (+58). • In 2017, the population of Navarre is estimated to make up 4.2% of the total population of Orono. While Hennepin County experienced growth between 2000 and 2010, Orono decreased in population. However, both the city and county are expected to grow from 2017 to 2022. Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 9 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC • Although the population of Navarre was only 342 persons in 2017; the population in- creases to over 2,100 persons within a one-mile radius, nearly 21,000 within three miles, and over 56,000 within five-miles. • Household growth outpaced population growth during the 2000s and is forecast to do so through 2022. The aging of the baby-boom generation, declining birth rates, and many couples choosing to postpone having children until later in life are all factors con- tributing to a declining average household size. These trends will continue to generate demand for more diverse housing products such as townhomes, and condominiums. Estimate Forecast 2000 2010 2017 2022 No.Pct.No.Pct. Navarre N/A N/A 342 357 N/A N/A 15 4.4% Navarre 1-mile radius N/A N/A 2,102 2,195 N/A N/A 93 4.4% Navarre 3-mile radius N/A N/A 20,890 21,826 N/A N/A 936 4.5% Navarre 5-mile radius N/A N/A 56,133 58,823 N/A N/A 2,690 4.8% Orono City 7,538 7,437 8,179 8,678 -101 -1.3%499 6.1% Hennepin County 1,116,200 1,152,425 1,248,638 1,312,919 36,225 3.2%64,281 5.1% Navarre N/A N/A 175 181 N/A N/A 6 3.4% Navarre 1-mile radius N/A N/A 932 968 N/A N/A 36 3.9% Navarre 3-mile radius N/A N/A 8,723 9,090 N/A N/A 367 4.2% Navarre 5-mile radius N/A N/A 21,685 22,670 N/A N/A 985 4.5% Orono City 2,763 2,821 3,080 3,253 58 2.1%173 5.6% Hennepin County 456,129 473,856 511,605 536,306 17,727 3.9%24,701 4.8% Navarre N/A N/A 1.95 1.97 Orono City 2.73 2.64 2.66 2.67 Hennepin County 2.45 2.43 2.44 2.45 Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; ESRI; Maxfield Research and Consulting, LLC POPULATION HOUSEHOLDS PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD TABLE 2 POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD GROWTH TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS MARKET AREA 2000 to 2022 Change U.S. Census 2000 to 2010 2017 to 2022 Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 10 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Age Distribution The age distribution of a community’s population helps in assessing the type of housing and commercial services needed. For example, younger and older people are more attracted to higher density housing located near urban services and entertainment while middle-aged peo- ple (particularly those with children) traditionally prefer lower-density single-family homes. In terms of retail, younger people typically seek services such as entertainment, electronics, and specialty apparel. Child stores increase in popularity for the 25 to 34 and 35 to 44 age cohorts while home furnishings are more frequently sought by the 45 to 54 and 55 to 64 age groups. Table 3 presents the age distribution of the Market Area population from 2000 to 2022. Infor- mation from 2000 and 2010 is sourced from the U.S. Census. The 2017 estimates and projec- tions for 2022 were calculated by Maxfield Research based on information from local building permits and economic conditions. The following are key trends about the age distribution of the Market Area’s population. • In 2017, we estimate that the largest adult cohort by age in Navarre is 45 to 54 totaling 63 people (19.4% of the total population), followed by the 55 to 64 age group with 56 people (17.3%). The same trend was found in Orono where the two largest age cohorts are also 45 to 54 (21.0%) and 55 to 64 (17.8%). • The greatest growth is projected to occur among older adults. Aging of baby boomers led to a 51.4% increase (+1,537 people) in the 55 to 64 population between 2000 and 2010 in Orono. As this group ages, the 65 to 74 and 75 plus age groups are projected to experience rapid growth from 2017 to 2022, expanding 28.0% and 32.8%, respectively. • A decline in the middle age cohorts is projected between 2017 and 2022 in Orono. The 45 to 54 age cohort is expected to decline 5.8%. • The weak growth projected for the middle age population is a result of the compara- tively small number of people who will move into those age cohorts between 2017 and 2022, a phenomenon known as the “baby bust.” The “baby bust” is often referred to the generation of children born between 1965 and 1980, an era when the United States birthrate dropped sharply. Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 11 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 12 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC 2000 2010 2017 2022 No.Pct.No.Pct. Under 18 N/A 66 63 65 N/A N/A 2 3.2% 18 to 24 N/A 16 18 17 N/A N/A -1 -5.6% 25 to 34 N/A 36 41 43 N/A N/A 2 4.9% 35 to 44 N/A 49 48 51 N/A N/A 3 6.3% 45 to 54 N/A 63 58 55 N/A N/A -3 -5.2% 55 to 64 N/A 56 61 63 N/A N/A 2 3.3% 65 to 74 N/A 26 40 47 N/A N/A 7 17.5% 75 plus N/A 12 15 18 N/A N/A 3 20.0% Total N/A 324 344 359 N/A N/A 15 44.4% Under 18 2,062 1,976 1,968 1,920 -86 -4.2%-48 -2.4% 18 to 24 337 325 439 468 -12 -3.6%29 6.6% 25 to 34 597 400 493 549 -197 -33.0%56 11.4% 35 to 44 1,414 914 872 927 -500 -35.4%55 6.3% 45 to 54 1,578 1,559 1,454 1,369 -19 -1.2%-85 -5.8% 55 to 64 874 1,323 1,537 1,607 449 51.4%70 4.6% 65 to 74 420 587 956 1,224 167 39.8%268 28.0% 75 plus 256 353 457 607 97 37.9%150 32.8% Total 7,538 7,437 8,176 8,671 -101 51.7%495 81.4% Under 18 267,502 261,345 268,719 274,768 -6,157 -2.3%6,049 2.3% 18 to 24 108,767 113,551 124,686 125,843 4,784 4.4%1,157 0.9% 25 to 34 183,860 187,523 191,588 198,828 3,663 2.0%7,240 3.8% 35 to 44 191,872 154,304 164,543 178,271 -37,568 -19.6%13,728 8.3% 45 to 54 156,068 171,130 161,675 156,373 15,062 9.7%-5,302 -3.3% 55 to 64 85,773 133,758 160,972 163,600 47,985 55.9%2,628 1.6% 65 to 74 59,737 66,516 101,312 125,133 6,779 11.3%23,821 23.5% 75 plus 62,621 64,298 75,143 90,103 1,677 2.7%14,960 19.9% Total 1,116,200 1,152,425 1,248,638 1,312,919 36,225 64.1%64,281 57.1% Sources: U.S. Census; ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC TABLE 3 Site Area Orono City Hennepin County POPULATION AGE DISTRIBUTION PRIMARY MARKET AREA 2000-2022 U.S. Census ESRI Change 2000-2010 Change 2017-2022 Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 13 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Household Income Distribution Income data is useful in that it can reflect wage trends and helps assess living conditions and reveal demand for different types of services. This data also helps determine demand for differ- ent types of owned and rented housing based on the size of the market at specific cost levels. In general, housing costs of up to 30 percent of income are considered affordable by the Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Household income data also helps ascertain demand for different types of retail services. People with lower incomes are likely to seek out discount retailers and spend a higher proportion of their income on necessities like grocery items. Retail services and goods such as dining and home furnishings will experience higher spending from more moderate-income households while upper income households will also shop for specialty apparel, recreation and sporting goods, and luxury items. The next three tables present data on household income by age of householder in 2017 and 2022 for Navarre, Orono, and Hennepin County. The data is estimated by ESRI and adjusted by Maxfield Research and Consulting, LLC to reflect the most current local household estimates and projections. The following are key points. • In 2017, the median household income for Navarre is estimated to be $91,744. This value is lower than the estimate for Orono ($136,259), but significantly higher than that of Hennepin County ($68,497). However, the median income for Navarre is expected to increase by 15.5% to $105,955 by 2022. • As households age through the lifecycle, their household income tends to peak in their late 40s and early 50s. This trend is evident in the Market Area as the age 45 to 54 co- hort has the highest estimated income at $189,487 in Orono. • Rental housing often targets younger renter households. The median household income in Orono is $63,804 for the under-25 age group and $102,544 for the 25 to 34 age group. Households earning the median income for these age groups could afford monthly housing costs estimated at $1,595 and $2,564, respectively. • Households in the 35 to 44 age group that may delay buying a home could afford a $3,879 monthly rent, based on the median household income of $155,158. • The median sale price for new construction multifamily housing units (twinhomes and detached townhomes) in Orono is approximately $677,00 (based on recently sold and active listings). Assuming that a potential home buyer has good credit and makes a 20% down payment, a household would need to have a minimum annual income of roughly $166,000 to be income-qualified for a new construction multifamily unit purchased at the median price in Orono. Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 14 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 15 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Total <25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 -74 75+ Less than $15,000 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 $15,000 to $24,999 8 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 $25,000 to $34,999 6 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 $35,000 to $49,999 29 1 5 5 4 5 6 3 $50,000 to $74,999 28 1 5 5 5 6 4 2 $75,000 to $99,999 18 1 3 4 3 3 3 1 $100,000 to $149,999 31 1 4 6 7 8 4 1 $150,000 to $199,999 14 0 2 3 4 4 1 0 $200,000+38 0 2 7 11 13 4 1 Total 175 4 23 32 36 42 27 11 Median Income $91,744 $75,000 $71,478 $100,000 $123,670 $120,118 $63,528 $46,511 Less than $15,000 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 $15,000 to $24,999 9 0 1 1 1 1 3 2 $25,000 to $34,999 6 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 $35,000 to $49,999 25 1 4 4 3 4 6 3 $50,000 to $74,999 27 1 5 5 4 5 5 2 $75,000 to $99,999 17 1 3 4 2 3 3 1 $100,000 to $149,999 36 1 5 7 7 9 6 1 $150,000 to $199,999 17 0 2 4 4 5 1 1 $200,000+43 0 3 8 12 14 5 1 Total 181 4 24 34 33 43 31 14 Median Income $105,955 $75,000 $81,880 $110,312 $144,931 $131,812 $71,613 $43,660 Less than $15,000 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 -0 -0 $15,000 to $24,999 1 0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 1 $25,000 to $34,999 -0 0 -0 -0 -1 -0 -0 1 $35,000 to $49,999 -4 -0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -0 -0 $50,000 to $74,999 -1 -0 -0 -0 -1 -1 1 -0 $75,000 to $99,999 -1 -0 -0 -0 -1 -0 -0 -0 $100,000 to $149,999 5 -0 1 1 -0 1 2 -0 $150,000 to $199,999 3 0 -0 1 -0 1 -0 1 $200,000+5 0 1 1 1 1 1 -0 Total -1 -0 -0 -0 -4 -1 3 2 Median Income $14,211 $0 $10,402 $10,312 $21,261 $11,694 $8,085 -$2,851 Sources: ESRI; US Census Bureau; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC 2017 2022 Change 2017 - 2022 TABLE 4 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER NAVARRE 2017 & 2022 Age of Householder Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 16 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Total <25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 -74 75+ Less than $15,000 24 2 2 2 2 6 4 6 $15,000 to $24,999 44 2 4 4 3 4 18 9 $25,000 to $34,999 36 2 5 5 4 6 7 7 $35,000 to $49,999 126 5 21 19 17 23 25 16 $50,000 to $74,999 148 5 27 21 23 32 26 14 $75,000 to $99,999 97 4 17 18 16 20 17 5 $100,000 to $149,999 155 3 20 26 31 39 30 6 $150,000 to $199,999 69 1 9 14 19 19 5 2 $200,000+237 2 15 38 64 79 32 6 Total 938 26 120 147 180 229 165 71 Median Income $97,619 $57,692 $76,100 $106,122 $136,225 $124,911 $77,335 $46,812 Less than $15,000 24 2 2 2 1 6 5 6 $15,000 to $24,999 43 2 4 3 3 3 17 11 $25,000 to $34,999 33 2 5 5 2 4 7 8 $35,000 to $49,999 114 4 18 17 14 18 26 17 $50,000 to $74,999 133 4 25 19 17 26 27 15 $75,000 to $99,999 99 4 18 18 14 19 19 7 $100,000 to $149,999 174 3 22 31 31 43 37 8 $150,000 to $199,999 81 1 11 17 20 21 7 4 $200,000+268 2 19 43 66 87 43 9 Total 968 24 124 155 167 226 187 85 Median Income $108,471 $60,207 $84,347 $116,920 $153,886 $141,252 $89,341 $50,556 Less than $15,000 -0 -0 -0 -0 -1 -0 1 -0 $15,000 to $24,999 -1 -0 -0 -1 -0 -1 -1 2 $25,000 to $34,999 -3 -0 -0 -0 -2 -2 -0 1 $35,000 to $49,999 -13 -1 -3 -2 -3 -5 1 1 $50,000 to $74,999 -16 -1 -2 -2 -6 -6 1 1 $75,000 to $99,999 1 -0 1 -0 -2 -1 2 2 $100,000 to $149,999 19 -0 2 5 -0 4 7 2 $150,000 to $199,999 12 -0 2 3 1 2 2 2 $200,000+31 -0 4 5 2 7 11 3 Total -13 -2 -3 -1 -15 -12 10 9 Median Income $10,852 $2,515 $8,247 $10,798 $17,661 $16,341 $12,006 $3,744 Sources: ESRI; US Census Bureau; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC 2017 2022 Change 2017 - 2022 TABLE 5 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER NAVARRE 1-MILE RADIUS 2017 & 2022 Age of Householder Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 17 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Total <25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 -74 75+ Less than $15,000 438 15 30 37 53 114 92 97 $15,000 to $24,999 472 19 35 45 44 80 113 136 $25,000 to $34,999 432 16 51 48 57 80 77 103 $35,000 to $49,999 907 32 111 117 134 175 180 158 $50,000 to $74,999 1,349 34 174 171 230 303 252 185 $75,000 to $99,999 1,048 19 138 165 209 261 192 64 $100,000 to $149,999 1,572 11 160 244 386 435 264 72 $150,000 to $199,999 789 5 65 143 238 217 98 23 $200,000+1,716 5 74 255 540 573 216 53 Total 8,723 156 838 1,225 1,891 2,238 1,484 891 Median Income $91,867 $47,455 $77,430 $104,070 $123,273 $108,725 $77,839 $44,226 Less than $15,000 460 16 28 40 40 103 109 124 $15,000 to $24,999 468 18 33 41 31 63 124 158 $25,000 to $34,999 407 13 44 45 35 66 83 121 $35,000 to $49,999 847 31 98 102 99 139 195 183 $50,000 to $74,999 1,233 29 153 155 165 245 271 215 $75,000 to $99,999 1,062 22 141 165 169 248 230 87 $100,000 to $149,999 1,783 13 184 289 364 473 348 112 $150,000 to $199,999 908 5 81 173 223 244 142 40 $200,000+1,922 5 90 299 498 636 307 87 Total 9,090 152 852 1,309 1,624 2,217 1,809 1,127 Median Income $101,249 $48,659 $85,486 $113,653 $133,315 $120,668 $86,626 $47,567 Less than $15,000 22 1 -2 3 -13 -11 17 27 $15,000 to $24,999 -4 -1 -2 -4 -13 -17 11 22 $25,000 to $34,999 -25 -3 -7 -3 -22 -14 6 18 $35,000 to $49,999 -60 -1 -13 -15 -35 -36 15 25 $50,000 to $74,999 -116 -5 -21 -16 -65 -58 19 30 $75,000 to $99,999 14 3 3 0 -40 -13 38 23 $100,000 to $149,999 211 2 24 45 -22 38 84 40 $150,000 to $199,999 119 0 16 30 -15 27 44 17 $200,000+206 0 16 44 -42 63 91 34 Total 42 -4 -18 10 -210 -111 190 185 Median Income $9,382 $1,204 $8,056 $9,583 $10,042 $11,943 $8,787 $3,341 Sources: ESRI; US Census Bureau; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC 2017 2022 Change 2017 - 2022 TABLE 6 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER NAVARRE 3-MILE RADIUS 2017 & 2022 Age of Householder Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 18 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Total <25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 -74 75+ Less than $15,000 908 34 64 72 108 238 182 210 $15,000 to $24,999 953 34 70 80 91 173 251 254 $25,000 to $34,999 1,012 30 110 104 134 190 179 265 $35,000 to $49,999 1,861 61 227 218 267 361 346 381 $50,000 to $74,999 2,852 73 363 338 478 599 525 476 $75,000 to $99,999 2,412 43 301 367 484 613 466 138 $100,000 to $149,999 4,128 29 403 615 1,064 1,161 657 199 $150,000 to $199,999 2,411 14 213 452 723 654 275 80 $200,000+5,093 20 243 824 1,635 1,609 584 178 Total 21,632 338 1,994 3,070 4,984 5,599 3,465 2,181 Median Income $106,948 $52,275 $86,704 $123,984 $141,240 $121,815 $86,651 $48,954 Less than $15,000 964 36 65 78 81 218 215 271 $15,000 to $24,999 943 33 66 70 59 133 274 308 $25,000 to $34,999 954 25 99 97 85 155 190 303 $35,000 to $49,999 1,743 60 205 185 197 289 369 438 $50,000 to $74,999 2,613 64 328 300 328 483 561 549 $75,000 to $99,999 2,433 43 314 363 383 580 563 187 $100,000 to $149,999 4,575 31 470 701 964 1,238 868 304 $150,000 to $199,999 2,708 14 259 532 660 727 389 127 $200,000+5,686 19 300 964 1,533 1,759 831 281 Total 22,618 325 2,106 3,290 4,289 5,581 4,259 2,768 Median Income $113,617 $52,254 $97,540 $135,702 $152,691 $133,557 $97,629 $51,960 Less than $15,000 56 2 1 6 -27 -20 33 61 $15,000 to $24,999 -10 -1 -4 -10 -32 -40 23 54 $25,000 to $34,999 -58 -5 -11 -7 -49 -35 11 38 $35,000 to $49,999 -118 -1 -22 -33 -70 -72 23 57 $50,000 to $74,999 -240 -9 -35 -38 -150 -116 36 73 $75,000 to $99,999 20 -0 13 -4 -101 -33 97 49 $100,000 to $149,999 447 2 67 86 -100 77 211 105 $150,000 to $199,999 296 -0 46 80 -63 73 114 47 $200,000+593 -1 57 140 -102 150 247 103 Total 97 -12 9 -0 -530 -240 433 437 Median Income $6,669 -$21 $10,836 $11,718 $11,451 $11,742 $10,978 $3,006 Sources: ESRI; US Census Bureau; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC 2017 2022 Change 2017 - 2022 TABLE 7 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER NAVARRE 5-MILE RADIUS 2017 & 2022 Age of Householder Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 19 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Total <25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 -74 75+ Less than $15,000 56 2 2 4 5 17 9 17 $15,000 to $24,999 87 2 4 6 8 15 32 20 $25,000 to $34,999 78 1 5 7 10 15 19 21 $35,000 to $49,999 180 4 19 21 26 34 35 41 $50,000 to $74,999 377 9 34 39 59 71 75 90 $75,000 to $99,999 322 6 32 49 60 77 69 29 $100,000 to $149,999 555 2 39 72 131 152 125 34 $150,000 to $199,999 333 1 25 56 97 88 48 18 $200,000+1,092 3 38 157 363 348 144 39 Total 3,080 30 198 411 759 817 556 309 Median Income $136,259 $63,804 $102,544 $155,158 $189,487 $163,004 $111,200 $62,452 Less than $15,000 62 2 2 4 6 14 12 22 $15,000 to $24,999 87 2 5 6 3 12 33 26 $25,000 to $34,999 74 1 5 7 6 13 20 22 $35,000 to $49,999 171 4 17 18 20 29 36 47 $50,000 to $74,999 353 7 32 33 41 57 79 104 $75,000 to $99,999 331 6 36 46 50 74 81 38 $100,000 to $149,999 622 2 44 79 125 161 160 51 $150,000 to $199,999 366 1 29 61 92 92 64 27 $200,000+1,186 3 45 169 346 371 195 57 Total 3,253 28 215 423 689 823 680 394 Median Income $141,731 $65,462 $108,435 $162,213 $200,001 $174,822 $119,256 $67,060 Less than $15,000 6 0 0 0 1 -3 3 5 $15,000 to $24,999 0 0 1 0 -5 -3 1 6 $25,000 to $34,999 -4 0 0 0 -4 -2 1 1 $35,000 to $49,999 -9 0 -2 -3 -6 -5 1 6 $50,000 to $74,999 -24 -2 -2 -6 -18 -14 4 14 $75,000 to $99,999 9 0 4 -3 -10 -3 12 9 $100,000 to $149,999 67 0 5 7 -6 9 35 17 $150,000 to $199,999 33 0 4 5 -5 4 16 9 $200,000+94 0 7 12 -17 23 51 18 Total 46 -2 6 -5 -48 -21 57 58 Median Income $5,472 $1,658 $5,891 $7,055 $10,514 $11,818 $8,056 $4,608 Sources: ESRI; US Census Bureau; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC 2017 2022 Change 2017 - 2022 TABLE 8 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER ORONO CITY 2017 & 2022 Age of Householder Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 20 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Total <25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 -74 75+ Less than $15,000 44,258 5,988 7,575 5,589 5,278 7,799 5,294 6,735 $15,000 to $24,999 42,732 4,274 7,349 5,400 4,341 5,867 6,290 9,211 $25,000 to $34,999 40,300 3,349 8,681 5,917 4,874 5,646 5,229 6,604 $35,000 to $49,999 59,869 3,731 12,622 9,333 8,414 8,907 8,261 8,601 $50,000 to $74,999 85,577 3,925 18,235 14,698 14,278 14,539 11,084 8,818 $75,000 to $99,999 65,409 1,996 13,762 12,898 11,960 12,396 8,335 4,062 $100,000 to $149,999 85,199 1,230 15,432 18,274 18,676 18,690 9,352 3,545 $150,000 to $199,999 40,399 590 5,686 8,865 11,237 8,852 3,999 1,170 $200,000+47,862 353 4,452 9,802 13,383 13,151 5,085 1,636 Total 511,605 25,436 93,794 90,776 92,441 95,847 62,929 50,382 Median Income $68,497 $31,725 $62,192 $82,052 $92,581 $83,783 $62,080 $38,534 Less than $15,000 45,953 6,145 7,586 6,027 4,898 7,410 6,102 7,785 $15,000 to $24,999 41,982 4,105 6,729 4,805 3,720 5,253 6,933 10,437 $25,000 to $34,999 37,952 3,108 7,731 5,405 3,922 4,879 5,760 7,147 $35,000 to $49,999 56,015 3,556 11,215 8,320 7,071 7,554 8,957 9,342 $50,000 to $74,999 80,045 3,732 16,650 13,595 11,774 12,606 11,981 9,707 $75,000 to $99,999 67,819 2,343 14,146 13,323 11,019 11,943 10,018 5,027 $100,000 to $149,999 101,536 1,546 18,805 22,176 19,881 20,840 12,917 5,371 $150,000 to $199,999 48,706 759 7,297 11,004 11,875 10,169 5,769 1,833 $200,000+56,298 416 5,701 11,940 13,770 14,554 7,428 2,489 Total 536,306 25,710 95,860 96,595 87,930 95,208 75,865 59,138 Median Income $76,759 $32,967 $70,962 $92,712 $102,495 $94,729 $70,010 $40,513 Less than $15,000 1,695 157 11 438 -380 -389 808 1,050 $15,000 to $24,999 -750 -169 -620 -595 -621 -614 643 1,226 $25,000 to $34,999 -2,348 -241 -950 -512 -952 -767 531 543 $35,000 to $49,999 -3,854 -175 -1,407 -1,013 -1,343 -1,353 696 741 $50,000 to $74,999 -5,532 -193 -1,585 -1,103 -2,504 -1,933 897 889 $75,000 to $99,999 2,410 347 384 425 -941 -453 1,683 965 $100,000 to $149,999 16,337 316 3,373 3,902 1,205 2,150 3,565 1,826 $150,000 to $199,999 8,307 169 1,611 2,139 638 1,317 1,770 663 $200,000+8,436 63 1,249 2,138 387 1,403 2,343 853 Total 7,958 42 -794 1,542 -5,536 -3,359 8,823 7,240 Median Income $8,262 $1,242 $8,770 $10,660 $9,914 $10,946 $7,930 $1,979 Sources: ESRI; US Census Bureau; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC 2017 2022 Change 2017 - 2022 TABLE 9 HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER HENNEPIN COUNTY 2017 & 2022 Age of Householder Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 21 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Household Type As with age distribution, the trends in types of households impact demand for different types of housing. Table 10 presents data on the types of households in the Market Area in 2010 and 2015. Family households include married-couple families with children (so-called "traditional" families), married couples without children (mostly empty nesters, but also young married cou- ples without children), and other-family households (single parents and unmarried couples with children). Non-family households include persons living alone and roommates (unrelated indi- viduals living together, including unmarried couples without children). • In 2015, there were a total of 3,184 family households in Orono including 766 married couples with children, 1,130 married couples without children, and 182 other families. Married couples without children include empty nesters, who are increasingly a market for for-sale multifamily housing and younger couples without children, who are also a primary market for rental housing. • From 2010 to 2015, the greatest growth among family households in Orono was among “other” families, which grew by 81 households (80.2%). This is in contrast with the de- crease by 119 households (-13.4%) in the number of married couples with children in Orono. • Conversely, from 2010 to 2015 in Hennepin County, the number of families categorized as “other” decreased by 269 households (-0.6%) and the number of married couples with children increased by 65 households (0.1%). • There were 1,106 non-family households in Orono in 2015. This includes 126 persons living alone and 980 roommate households. Persons living alone added 28 households (28.6%) to Orono from 2010 to 2015, while the number of roommate households in- creased by 339 (52.9%). Roommate households consist of unrelated persons living with each other to share housing costs and unmarried couples without children, among oth- ers. These persons also tend to be younger and often prefer to live in locations that are closer to entertainment, activities, and other nightlife. Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 22 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Households 2010 2015 2010 2015 2010 2015 2010 2015 2010 2015 2010 2015 Orono City 2,821 3,184 885 766 1,096 1,130 101 182 98 126 641 980 Hennepin County 472,586 488,941 94,635 94,700 112,311 120,473 45,268 44,999 22,026 23,774 198,346 204,995 State of Minnesota 1,895,127 2,087,227 477,615 443,212 540,630 617,297 236,896 288,506 509,468 584,008 130,518 154,204 Percent Orono City 100.0 100.0 31.4%24.1%38.9%35.5%3.6%5.7%3.5%4.0%22.7%30.8% Hennepin County 100.0 100.0 20.0%19.4%23.8%24.6%9.6%9.2%4.7%4.9%42.0%41.9% State of Minnesota 100.0 100.0 25.2%21.2%28.5%29.6%12.5%13.8%26.9%28.0%6.9%7.4% No.Pct.No.Pct.No.Pct.No.Pct.No.Pct.No.Pct. Orono City 363 12.9%-119 -13.4%34 3.1%81 80.2%28 28.6%339 52.9% Hennepin County 16,355 3.5%65 0.1%8,162 7.3%-269 -0.6%1,748 7.9%6,649 3.4% State of Minnesota 192,100 10.1%-34,403 -7.2%76,667 14.2%51,610 21.8%74,540 14.6%23,686 18.1% * Single-parents with children ** Includes unmarried couples without children and group quarters Sources: U. S. Census; ESRI, Inc.; Maxfield Research and Consulting, LLC Change 2010-2015 Total HH's Married w/ Child Married w/o Child Other *Living Alone Roommates ** TABLE 10 HOUSEHOLD TYPE PRIMARY MARKET AREA 2010 & 2015 Family Households Non-Family Households Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 23 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Summary of Demographic Trends The following points summarize key demographic trends that will impact development in Na- varre. • The population in Orono is forecast to grow by 499 people (+6.1%) and 173 households (+5.6%) between 2017 and 2022. • The population over age 65 is expected to experience a substantial increase in Orono, as a result of the aging of the baby boom generation. • Median incomes are rising in Orono, with a 4.0% increase forecast between 2017 and 2022 as incomes rise from $136,259 to $141,731. • Only 15% of residential units in Orono are renter-occupied. Out of renter-occupied units, 66.7% are single-family homes, the rest are in structures with 50 or more units. • Between 2010 and 2015, married couple households with children decreased in Orono, while married couple households without children, other family households and household- ers living alone increased. Orono Building Permit Data Based on building permit data obtained from Metropolitan Council, Table 11 presents the num- ber of housing units added in Orono since 2007. • A total of 360 new housing units were delivered in Orono between 2007 and 2016. Approxi- mately 83% of the permitted units were for single-family homes (298), while 17.2% were for multifamily units (62 units). • The number of new permits generally increased each year since 2007. The number of per- mitted single-family housing units added from 2012 to 2016 (205 units) was over double of those added from 2007 to 2011 (93 units). Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 24 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Housing Units by Structure Type Based on Census data, Table 12 presents the number of housing units by housing type as com- pared with housing tenure. Housing types compared include single-family detached units, townhouse units, and multifamily units. Multifamily includes duplex, triplex, and four-plex units as well as buildings with five or more units. • Out of all residential housing units in Orono about 94% were single-family homes, while only 6% of units were multifamily. However, when considering housing tenure, out of owner-occupied units, 99% were single family homes, while out of renter-occupied units 66.7% of units were single family homes. • For Hennepin County in 2015, single detached homes accounted for 90.4% of owner- occupied housing units. The largest portion of renter-occupied units in Hennepin County were those in structures containing 50 or more units accounting for 32.2% of all units. This compares with just in Orono, where structures containing 50 or more units were the only type of multifamily structure. Year Family Multifamily 2007 23 0 23 2008 23 0 23 2009 20 0 20 2010 10 0 10 2011 17 62 79 2012 25 0 25 2013 39 0 39 2014 42 0 42 2015 62 0 62 2016 37 0 37 Total 298 62 360 Sources: Met Council; Maxfield Research & Consulting LLC TABLE 11 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION BUILDING PERMITTED UNITS ISSUED ORONO, MN 2007 to 2017 Units Permitted Total Units Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 25 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 26 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Housing Resale Values Table 13 presents recently sold single family homes, condos/townhomes, and multi-family homes in Navarre and Orono from January 2017 to mid-November 2017. • A total of 186 properties were identified as recently sold in Orono with 153 single family homes listed and 33 condo or multi-family homes. • The largest percentage (30%) of single family homes in Orono were sold for over $1,000,000. Only 5% of single family homes were sold for less than $200,000. • Only 16 homes have sold through mid-November 2017 in Navarre. Compared to Orono proper the housing market in Navarre is much more affordable as the average and me- dian sales price was $215,305 and $206,500, respectively. The housing stock is also older and smaller as the average home size was 1,476 finished square feet. Owner-Renter-Owner-Renter- Units in Structure Occupied Pct.Occupied Pct.Occupied Pct.Occupied Pct. 1, detached 2,615 96.6%239 50.0%247,800 80.6%23,400 12.8% 1, attached 66 2.4%80 16.7%30,109 9.8%12,592 6.9% 2 0 0.0%0 0.0%4,012 1.3%12,829 7.0% 3 to 4 10 0.4%0 0.0%2,669 0.9%8,885 4.9% 5 to 9 0 0.0%0 0.0%2,588 0.8%10,911 6.0% 10 to 19 0 0.0%0 0.0%2,076 0.7%22,573 12.3% 20 to 49 0 0.0%0 0.0%4,620 1.5%32,276 17.7% 50 or more 15 0.6%159 33.3%12,573 4.1%58,794 32.2% Mobile home 0 0.0%0 0.0%910 0.3%446 0.2% Boat, RV, van, etc.0 0.0%0 0.0%38 0.0%95 0.1% Total 2,706 100%478 100%307,395 100%182,801 100% Sources: U.S. Census Bureau - American Community Survey; Maxfield Research and Consulting LLC TABLE 12 HOUSING UNITS BY STRUCTURE & TENURE PRIMARY MARKET AREA 2015 ORONO CITY HENNEPIN COUNTY Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 27 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Cost Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent < $99,999 0 0%0 0%0 0%3 9%0 0%3 2% $100,000 to $199,999 3 33%8 5%3 43%0 0%6 38%8 4% $200,000 to $299,999 5 56%13 8%4 57%9 27%9 56%22 12% $300,000 to $399,999 1 11%12 8%0 0%14 42%1 6%26 14% $400,000 to $499,999 0 0%14 9%0 0%0 0%0 0%14 8% $500,000 to $599,000 0 0%13 8%0 0%1 3%0 0%14 8% $600,000 to $699,000 0 0%12 8%0 0%5 15%0 0%17 9% $700,000 to $799,000 0 0%11 7%0 0%1 3%0 0%12 6% $800,000 to $899,000 0 0%15 10%0 0%0 0%0 0%15 8% $900,000 to $999,999 0 0%9 6%0 0%0 0%0 0%9 5% $1,000,000 and over 0 0%46 30%0 0%0 0%0 0%46 25% Total 9 100%153 100%7 100%33 100%16 100%186 100% Sources: Trulia; Realtor.com; RE/MAX; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Orono TABLE 13 RECENTLY SOLD (JANUARY 2017- NOVEMBER 2017) MARKET AREA Total Navarre Orono Single Family Homes Condo/ Townhomes/ Multi-Family Homes Navarre Orono Navarre Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 28 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Active Listings Table 14 presents currently listed, for-sale single family homes, condos, and multi-family homes in Navarre and Orono as of mid-November 2017. • A total of 115 properties were identified as actively listed for-sale in Orono with 101 sin- gle family homes listed and 14 condo or multi-family homes. • The largest percentage (50%) of single family homes in Orono were listed for over $1,000,000 with only 5% listed for under $300,000. • Only seven homes were listed for sale in the Navarre area. The median list price of these listings was $288,450. Cost Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent < $99,999 0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0% $100,000 to $199,999 3 50%4 4%0 0%0 0%3 43%4 3% $200,000 to $299,999 0 0%1 1%0 0%0 0%0 0%1 1% $300,000 to $399,999 1 17%7 7%0 0%3 21%1 14%10 9% $400,000 to $499,999 1 17%4 4%0 0%1 7%1 14%5 4% $500,000 to $599,000 0 0%4 4%1 100%3 21%1 14%7 6% $600,000 to $699,000 0 0%6 6%0 0%4 29%0 0%10 9% $700,000 to $799,000 0 0%6 6%0 0%2 14%0 0%8 7% $800,000 to $899,000 1 17%3 3%0 0%1 7%1 14%4 3% $900,000 to $999,999 0 0%8 8%0 0%0 0%0 0%8 7% $1,000,000 and over 0 0%58 57%0 0%0 0%0 0%58 50% Total 6 100%101 100%1 100%14 100%7 100%115 100% Sources: Zillow; Realtor.com; RE/MAX; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Navarre Total Orono Single Family Homes TABLE 14 ACTIVE LISTINGS NOVEMBER 2017 Navarre Orono Condo/ Townhomes/ Multi-Family Homes Navarre Orono Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 29 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC New For-Sale Housing Projects Table 15 presents active and pending for-sale new construction single family homes in Orono as of mid-November 2017. • A total of 39 new construction projects were identified as actively listed for-sale in Orono. • The largest percentage (54%) of single family homes in Orono were listed for over $1,000,000 with no active or pending new construction homes listed for under $400,000. • The median price per square foot (PSF) of a new single-family home in Orono is $253 PSF; compared to $210 PSF for a for-sale multifamily home (twinhome or detached townhome). Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 30 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Cost Count Percent $400,000- $499,999 1 3% $500,000-$599,999 3 8% $600,000- $699,999 6 15% $700,000- $799,999 6 15% $800,000- $899,999 2 5% $900,000- $999,999 0 0% $1,000,000- $1,199,999 1 3% $1,200,000- $1,299,999 9 23% $1,300,000- $1,399,999 2 5% $1,400,000- $1,499,999 2 5% $1,500,000 +7 18% Total 39 100% TABLE 15 NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (ACTIVE AND PENDING) ORONO Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 31 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Selected Multifamily Housing Developments Table 16 lists selected multifamily housing developments in Navarre and from other Lake Min- netonka area communities. Data comprises of both for sale and rental properties and includes the number of units and bedrooms and pricing. The following points summarize the current market for multifamily residential units in Navarre. • The for-sale units range in size from 850 square feet to 4,600 square feet, while the for- rent units range in size from 450 to 2,049 square feet. • Pricing for the for-sale condominium units is at the luxury end as prices range from $273,917 to over $3,500,000. Most of new condominium product is being developed in Downtown Wayzata with prices starting at $500,000 with most product selling for over $1,000,000. • Pricing for the for-rent units ranges from $750 per month for a studio to $3,575 per month for a two-bedroom unit. • Besides The Mist on Lake Minnetonka which was built in 2007, all the other for-rent pro- jects predate 2000. The for-sale units were all built after 2000. Price/ Sqft Name Type Yr. Open No. of Units Bedrooms Min -Max Min -Max Avg. For Sale The Landing 815 Wayzata Blvd E; Wayzata Condos 2017 31 2-3 BR 1,220 -4,600 $825,000 -$3,500,000 $719 Meyer Place at Ferndale 105 Lake St E; Wayzata Condos 2017 21 2-4BR 2,000 -4,000 $1,290,000 -$2,399,000 $622 The Regatta 801 Lake St E; Wayzata Condos 2015 59 1-2BR 850 -4,000 $500,000 -$2,000,000 $544 Lakeview Lofts 4100 Spring St; Spring Park Condos 2005 32 1-2BR 1,297 -1,534 $273,917 -$380,202 $230 For Rent The Mist on Lake Minnetonka 4201 Sunset Dr; Spring Park Apartments 2007 121 1-2BR 1,260 -2,049 N/A -$3,575 N/A Minnetonka Edgewater 4177 Shoreline Dr; Spring Park Apartments 1967 82 0-2BR 450 -1,078 $875 -$1,450 $1.64 Bayview Apartments 2400 Interlachen Rd; Spring Park Apartments 1969 107 0-3BR 500 -1,200 $750 -$1,500 $1.33 Parkshore Apartments 4601 Shoreline Dr; Spring Park Apartments 1984 92 1-2BR 643 -1,050 N/A N/A N/A Source: Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC TABLE 16 SELECTED MULTIFAMILY UNITS NAVARRE SURROUNDING AREA Size Range Cost Range Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 32 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Selected Multifamily & Commercial Development The Mist on Lake Minnetonka Lakeview Lofts The Regatta The Landing - Hotel Senior Housing The term “senior housing” refers to any housing development that is restricted to persons age 55 or older. Today, senior housing includes a spectrum of housing alternatives, which occasion- ally overlap, thus making the differences somewhat ambiguous. However, the level of support services offered best distinguishes them. The following figure classifies senior housing projects into five categories based on the level of support services that are offered. Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 33 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Table 17 shows the inventory of existing market rate senior housing products in Navarre and the surrounding Lake Minnetonka communities that would be competitive with a new market rate senior housing development on the subject property. • As displayed in Table 17, five properties with a total of over 300 units were identified near the Orono area. • Four out of five projects offered assisted living care and only one out of the five projects offered solely adult/few services units. • Although there are no senior housing developments in Navarre, a large senior housing campus is located to the west in Spring Park (Lake Minnetonka Shores). Townhome or Apartment Source: Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Senior Housing Product Type Age-Restricted Independent Single-Family, Townhomes, Apartments, Condominiums, Cooperatives Congregate Apartments w/ Optional Services Congregate Apartments w/ Intensive Services Assisted Living Nursing Facilities Memory Care (Alzheimer's and Dementia Units) Continuum of Housing and Services for Seniors Fully Independent Lifestyle Single-Family Home Fully or Highly Dependent on Care Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 34 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Selected Senior Housing Developments Folkestone Presbyterian Homes- Lake Minnetonka Shores Project/ Address Year Built Number of Units Services Presbyterian Homes and Services (Folkestone) 100 Promenade Ave; Wayzata 2013 254 Adult/ Few Services/ Assisted Living/ Memory Care Trails of Orono 875 Wayzata Blvd; Wayzata 2012 76 Assisted Living/ Memory Care Orono Woods Senior Apartments 2040 Wayzata Blvd; Long Lake 2002 62 Adult/ Few Services Long Lake Assisted Living LLC 345 North Brown Rd; Long Lake 2005 N/A Assisted Living/ Housing With Services Sojourn Suites LLC 3645 Lyric Ave; Navarre (8 locations total) 1984 2-7 per location Assisted Living/ Housing With Services/ Memory Care Presbyterian Homes and Services (Lake Minnetonka Shores) 4527 Shoreline Dr; Spring Park 1978 131 Adult/ Few Services/ Assisted Living/ Memory Care Source: Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC TABLE 17 SELECTED SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS NAVARRE SURROUNDING AREA NOVEMBER 2017 Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 35 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Trails of Orono Long Lake Assisted Living Consumer Expenditure Patterns Table 18 shows estimated consumer expenditures and average expenditures per households for retail goods and services in Navarre and Orono compared to all of Hennepin County in 2017. Data was obtained from ESRI based on Consumer Expenditure Surveys from the Bureau of La- bor Statistics. The table shows the average expenditures per household in the Market Area by product or ser- vice. The average expenditure reflects the average amount spent per household, while the total expenditure reflects the aggregate amount spent by all households. In addition, a Spending Po- tential Index (SPI) is illustrated for comparison purposes. The SPI is based on households and represents the annual expenditures for a product or service relative to the national average which is given a benchmark index of 100. An SPI of 115 indicates that the average annual ex- penditure by local consumers is 15% above the national average. Two-thirds of the national economy is driven by consumer spending. Consumer spending is in- fluenced by market conditions and trends. In times of economic troubles, market conditions drive spending patterns toward convenience and necessities, whereas in times of a booming economy consumer trends feature opportunity and luxury items. During the most recent reces- sion, when the housing market began its decline in late 2006 into 2007, consumer spending and consumer confidence followed. Households decreased spending, increased savings, and re- duced credit card debt as many households were faced with job losses. As the nation exited the recession, consumers gained confidence and spending gradually recov- ered. Consumer confidence continues to grow suggesting economic growth with higher con- sumption. The following are key points from the household expenditures table. Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 36 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC • Overall, Navarre residents will spend an estimated $6.9 million on retail goods and ser- vices in 2017, excluding housing, finance/insurance, and travel expenditures, as well as vehicle purchases. • Average annual expenditures (excluding the categories mentioned above) are estimated to be $38,538 per household in Navarre. This compares to an average of $27,506 per household for Hennepin County. • As reflected in the SPI, expenditures by Navarre and Orono households are higher than the Hennepin County average in every product and service category. • Among the retail categories, Market Area spending was greatest for Food at Home (i.e. groceries) at an average of $8,353 per household in Navarre compared to $6,052 per household in Hennepin County. • Spending was also high for Food Away from Home ($5,693 per Navarre household) and Entertainment and Recreation goods and services ($5,375 per household in Navarre). Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 37 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Orono City Expenditures Hennepin County Expenditures Total Average Average Average Category ($000's)Per HH Per HH Per HH Navarre Orono City Hennepin County Goods & Services Index Index Index Apparel & Services $650 $3,715 $5,299 $2,674 172 245 124 Entertainment and Recreation $941 $5,375 $7,662 $3,749 172 246 120 Nonprescription Drugs $38 $215 $292 $148 168 229 116 Prescription Drugs $113 $646 $869 $434 166 224 112 Eye Glasses & Contact Lenses $29 $163 $229 $111 173 243 117 Personal Care Products $141 $804 $1,097 $574 171 233 122 Child Care $145 $826 $1,235 $609 172 258 127 School Books & Supplies $46 $263 $369 $195 170 239 126 Smoking Products $110 $631 $706 $472 152 170 113 Computer Hardware $53 $304 $429 $220 176 248 127 Computer Software $4 $20 $29 $15 176 251 132 Pets $178 $1,017 $1,408 $682 171 236 114 Food Index Index Index Food at Home $1,462 $8,354 $11,114 $6,052 166 221 120 Food Away from Home $996 $5,693 $7,818 $4,121 171 235 124 Alcoholic Beverages $173 $990 $1,423 $705 178 256 127 Home Index Index Index Home Mortgage Payment/Rent $2,726 $15,574 $24,766 $9,967 181 287 116 Maintenance & Remodeling Services $622 $3,557 $5,845 $2,218 183 301 114 Maintenance & Remodeling Material $121 $689 $1,138 $433 170 281 107 Utilities $1,456 $8,317 $11,246 $5,898 165 223 117 Household Furnishings, Equipment, & Operations Index Index Index Household Textiles $29 $167 $240 $118 175 252 124 Furniture $174 $995 $1,400 $711 174 245 124 Rugs $8 $43 $69 $29 185 299 125 Major Appliances $96 $549 $772 $363 171 241 113 Small Appliances $15 $83 $113 $60 172 233 124 Housewares $29 $163 $222 $114 172 234 120 Luggage $4 $22 $35 $15 181 292 128 Telephone & Accessories $21 $118 $151 $86 171 218 125 Lawn & Garden $129 $739 $1,113 $469 176 265 112 Moving/Storage/Freight Express $19 $111 $143 $86 174 223 134 Housekeeping Supplies $209 $1,195 $1,610 $842 168 226 118 Financial & Insurance Index Index Index Investments $2,069 $11,825 $20,817 $7,512 191 336 121 Vehicle Loans $775 $4,430 $5,684 $3,156 163 209 116 Owners & Renters Insurance $156 $889 $1,298 $569 172 251 110 Vehicle Insurance $345 $1,973 $2,671 $1,408 168 227 120 Life/Other Insurance $134 $764 $1,232 $495 179 288 116 Health Insurance $1,089 $6,225 $8,733 $4,237 170 239 116 Spending Potential Index to USA TABLE 19 ESTIMATED HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURES BY SELECTED PRODUCT TYPE PRIMARY MARKET AREA Navarre Annual Expenditures 2017 CONTINUED Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 38 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Retail Demand Potential and Leakage Tables 20 through 24 on the following pages present current retail sales and consumer expendi- ture data for Block Groups 27053072031 and 27053072032; Orono; Hennepin County; and a 5- mile radius around Navarre. Due to ESRI data limitations, information could not be provided for the Navarre site area and instead the two block groups closest to the site were analyzed (see map on the following page). The sales information is from ESRI based on household counts. This information lists retail demand (potential sales), retail supply to consumers (retail sales) and provides a picture of the gap between the area’s retail supply and demand. A positive value represents “leakage” of retail opportunity to stores outside of the Market Area. A negative value represents a “surplus,” where more customers are coming into the area for retail goods and services than there are households in the area. • As depicted in the tables and illustrated in the following graphs, leakages exist in most retail industry segments in both Navarre and Orono. For the Navarre area block groups, Orono City Expenditures Hennepin County Expenditures Total Average Average Average Category ($000's)Per HH Per HH Per HH Navarre Orono City Hennepin County Transportation Index Index Index Cars and Trucks (Net Outlay)$656 $3,746 $4,893 $2,635 167 218 117 Gasoline and Motor Oil $794 $4,535 $5,917 $3,257 164 213 117 Vehicle Maintenance/Repair $318 $1,818 $2,515 $1,276 170 235 119 Travel Index Index Index Airline Fares $163 $933 $1,501 $645 183 295 127 Lodging $167 $951 $1,500 $634 182 286 121 Vehicle Rental $8 $48 $75 $32 182 282 123 Food & Drink on Trips $155 $888 $1,358 $600 180 275 122 Average Annual Household Expenditures Summary Goods & Services $2,446 $12,962 $18,217 $9,202 Food $2,631 $15,036 $20,354 $10,878 Home $4,924 $28,138 $42,995 $18,517 Household $733 $4,186 $5,868 $2,893 Financial and Insurance $4,569 $26,106 $40,436 $17,376 Transportation $1,767 $10,099 $13,325 $7,168 Travel $494 $2,821 $4,434 $1,910 Total $17,564 $99,349 $145,627 $67,944 Sources: ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Navarre Annual Expenditures Spending Potential Index to USA TABLE 19 CONTINUED ESTIMATED HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURES BY SELECTED PRODUCT TYPE PRIMARY MARKET AREA 2017 Note: The Spending Potential Index is based on households and represents the amount spent for a product or service relative to the national average of 100. Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 39 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC the total Retail Trade industry (including Food and Drink) experienced a $46.5 million sales leakage in 2017, while Orono experienced a $209.8 million sales leakage. • There is high leakage in Orono and from within the three- and five-mile radius of Na- varre. This suggests the Navarre area is under retailed and could support new commer- cial development. Navarre Site Block Groups Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 40 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC ----surplus---- ------leakage------ Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 41 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 42 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC ------leakage------ ----surplus---- Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 43 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Demand Supply Retail Gap Surplus/Leakage Number of Industry Group (NAICS Code)(Retail Potential)(Retail Sales)(Demand - Supply)Factor Businesses Total Retail Trade and Food & Drink (NAICS 44-45, 722)$83,246,161 $36,712,858 $46,533,303 38.8 24 Total Retail Trade (NAICS 44-45)$74,923,922 $31,455,599 $43,468,323 40.9 18 Total Food & Drink (NAICS 722)$8,322,239 $5,257,259 $3,064,980 22.6 6 Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers $15,332,266 $4,274,957 $11,057,309 56.4 5 Automobile Dealers $12,220,953 $0 $12,220,953 100.0 0 Other Motor Vehicle Dealers $1,736,499 $0 $1,736,499 100.0 0 Auto Parts, Accessories & Tire Stores $1,374,814 $4,274,957 ($2,900,143)(51.3)5 Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores $2,433,512 $938,640 $1,494,872 44.3 1 Furniture Stores $1,446,739 $0 $1,446,739 100.0 0 Home Furnishings Stores $986,773 $938,640 $48,133 2.5 1 Electronics & Appliance Stores $2,864,604 $0 $2,864,604 100.0 0 Bldg Materials, Garden Equip. & Supply Stores $5,412,792 $3,223,242 $2,189,550 25.4 3 Bldg Material & Supplies Dealers $4,894,588 $3,223,242 $1,671,346 20.6 3 Lawn & Garden Equip & Supply Stores $518,204 $0 $518,204 100.0 0 Food & Beverage Stores $11,791,677 $13,854,475 ($2,062,798)(8.0)2 Grocery Stores $9,646,239 $13,368,035 ($3,721,796)(16.2)1 Specialty Food Stores $596,215 $0 $596,215 100.0 0 Beer, Wine & Liquor Stores $1,549,223 $486,440 $1,062,783 52.2 1 Health & Personal Care Stores $5,225,483 $0 $5,225,483 100.0 0 Gasoline Stations $7,998,282 $7,625,612 $372,670 2.4 2 Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores $4,167,426 $0 $4,167,426 100.0 0 Clothing Stores $2,807,837 $0 $2,807,837 100.0 0 Shoe Stores $576,622 $0 $576,622 100.0 0 Jewelry, Luggage & Leather Goods Stores $782,967 $0 $782,967 100.0 0 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores $2,352,042 $354,365 $1,997,677 73.8 1 Sporting Goods/Hobby/Musical Instr Stores $2,043,401 $354,365 $1,689,036 70.4 1 Book, Periodical & Music Stores $308,641 $0 $308,641 100.0 0 General Merchandise Stores $13,233,944 $708,161 $12,525,783 89.8 1 Department Stores Excluding Leased Depts.$9,975,419 $0 $9,975,419 100.0 0 Other General Merchandise Stores $3,258,525 $708,161 $2,550,364 64.3 1 Miscellaneous Store Retailers $2,875,558 $228,135 $2,647,423 85.3 2 Florists $168,075 $95,461 $72,614 27.6 1 Office Supplies, Stationary & Gift Stores $605,024 $0 $605,024 100.0 0 Used Merchandise Stores $375,089 $0 $375,089 100.0 0 Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers $1,727,370 $132,674 $1,594,696 85.7 1 Nonstore Retailers $1,236,336 $248,012 $988,324 66.6 1 Electronic Shopping & Mail-Order Houses $960,637 $0 $960,637 100.0 0 Vending Machine Operators $54,560 $0 $54,560 100.0 0 Direct Selling Establishments $221,139 $248,012 ($26,873)(5.7)1 Food Services & Drinking Places $8,322,239 $5,257,259 $3,064,980 22.6 6 Special Food Services $200,835 $227,460 ($26,625)(6.2)1 Drinking Places - Alcoholic Beverages $508,937 $1,048,301 ($539,364)(34.6)1 Restaurants/Other Eating Places $7,612,467 $3,981,498 $3,630,969 31.3 4 Sources: ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC SUMMARY EXPENDITURE TYPE Note: All figures quoted in 2016 dollars. Supply (retail sales ) estimates sales to consumers by establishments, sales to businesses are excluded. Demand (retail potential) estimates the expected amout spent by consumers at a retail establishment. Leakage/Surplus factor measures the relationship between supply and demand at ranges from +100 (total leakage) to -100 (total surplus). A positive value represents "leakage" of retail opportunity outside the trade area. A negative value represents a surplus of retail sales, a market where customers are drawn in from outside the trade area. TABLE 20 RETAIL DEMAND POTENTIAL AND LEAKAGE BLOCK GROUPS 27053072031 AND 27053072032 2017 Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 44 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Demand Supply Retail Gap Surplus/Leakage Number of Industry Group (NAICS Code)(Retail Potential)(Retail Sales)(Demand - Supply)Factor Businesses Total Retail Trade and Food & Drink (NAICS 44-45, 722)$535,612,858 $172,168,743 $363,444,115 51.3 120 Total Retail Trade (NAICS 44-45)$482,523,379 $133,891,510 $348,631,869 56.6 89 Total Food & Drink (NAICS 722)$53,089,479 $38,277,232 $14,812,247 16.2 31 Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers $99,423,043 $23,897,095 $75,525,948 61.2 15 Automobile Dealers $79,182,070 $2,050,214 $77,131,856 95.0 3 Other Motor Vehicle Dealers $11,338,855 $16,703,910 ($5,365,055)(19.1)6 Auto Parts, Accessories & Tire Stores $8,902,118 $5,142,971 $3,759,147 26.8 6 Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores $15,746,253 $4,068,157 $11,678,096 58.9 6 Furniture Stores $9,240,709 $705,683 $8,535,026 85.8 1 Home Furnishings Stores $6,505,543 $3,362,474 $3,143,069 31.9 5 Electronics & Appliance Stores $18,233,322 $7,727,957 $10,505,365 40.5 6 Bldg Materials, Garden Equip. & Supply Stores $36,688,185 $10,731,333 $25,956,852 54.7 9 Bldg Material & Supplies Dealers $33,012,711 $9,129,145 $23,883,566 56.7 8 Lawn & Garden Equip & Supply Stores $3,675,474 $1,602,187 $2,073,287 39.3 1 Food & Beverage Stores $75,096,200 $36,591,107 $38,505,093 34.5 9 Grocery Stores $61,451,947 $29,157,128 $32,294,819 35.6 3 Specialty Food Stores $3,792,310 $445,514 $3,346,796 79.0 1 Beer, Wine & Liquor Stores $9,851,942 $6,988,465 $2,863,477 17.0 5 Health & Personal Care Stores $33,767,842 $7,834,775 $25,933,067 62.3 5 Gasoline Stations $50,957,027 $18,086,810 $32,870,217 47.6 5 Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores $26,545,442 $14,016,785 $12,528,657 30.9 10 Clothing Stores $17,836,647 $5,358,116 $12,478,531 53.8 7 Shoe Stores $3,687,554 $0 $3,687,554 100.0 0 Jewelry, Luggage & Leather Goods Stores $5,021,241 $8,658,669 ($3,637,428)(26.6)3 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores $14,934,881 $1,638,205 $13,296,676 80.2 3 Sporting Goods/Hobby/Musical Instr Stores $12,986,768 $1,638,205 $11,348,563 77.6 3 Book, Periodical & Music Stores $1,948,113 $0 $1,948,113 100.0 0 General Merchandise Stores $84,610,381 $1,448,666 $83,161,715 96.6 3 Department Stores Excluding Leased Depts.$63,775,567 $0 $63,775,567 100.0 0 Other General Merchandise Stores $20,834,815 $1,340,482 $19,494,333 87.9 2 Miscellaneous Store Retailers $18,422,426 $7,523,946 $10,898,480 42.0 17 Florists $1,228,539 $606,436 $622,103 33.9 2 Office Supplies, Stationary & Gift Stores $3,891,558 $3,026,738 $864,820 12.5 3 Used Merchandise Stores $2,366,857 $714,706 $1,652,151 53.6 3 Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers $10,935,473 $3,176,066 $7,759,407 55.0 8 Nonstore Retailers $8,098,379 $326,676 $7,771,703 92.2 1 Electronic Shopping & Mail-Order Houses $6,149,255 $0 $6,149,255 100.0 0 Vending Machine Operators $346,660 $0 $346,660 100.0 0 Direct Selling Establishments $1,602,464 $248,012 $1,354,452 73.2 1 Food Services & Drinking Places $53,089,479 $38,277,232 $14,812,247 16.2 31 Special Food Services $1,337,609 $414,454 $923,155 52.7 2 Drinking Places - Alcoholic Beverages $3,310,413 $1,935,735 $1,374,678 26.2 2 Restaurants/Other Eating Places $48,441,457 $35,927,043 $12,514,414 14.8 27 Sources: ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC SUMMARY EXPENDITURE TYPE Note: All figures quoted in 2016 dollars. Supply (retail sales ) estimates sales to consumers by establishments, sales to businesses are excluded. Demand (retail potential) estimates the expected amout spent by consumers at a retail establishment. Leakage/Surplus factor measures the relationship between supply and demand at ranges from +100 (total leakage) to -100 (total surplus). A positive value represents "leakage" of retail opportunity outside the trade area. A negative value represents a surplus of retail sales, a market where customers are drawn in from outside the trade area. TABLE 21 RETAIL DEMAND POTENTIAL AND LEAKAGE NAVARRE 3-MILE RADIUS 2017 Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 45 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Demand Supply Retail Gap Surplus/Leakage Number of Industry Group (NAICS Code)(Retail Potential)(Retail Sales)(Demand - Supply)Factor Businesses Total Retail Trade and Food & Drink (NAICS 44-45, 722)$1,465,161,877 $420,595,936 $1,044,565,941 55.4 309 Total Retail Trade (NAICS 44-45)$1,319,383,170 $334,264,186 $985,118,984 59.6 233 Total Food & Drink (NAICS 722)$145,778,708 $86,331,750 $59,446,958 25.6 76 Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers $273,031,317 $48,007,748 $225,023,569 70.1 25 Automobile Dealers $217,457,583 $7,977,305 $209,480,278 92.9 4 Other Motor Vehicle Dealers $31,302,300 $33,208,460 ($1,906,160)(3.0)12 Auto Parts, Accessories & Tire Stores $24,271,434 $6,821,983 $17,449,451 56.1 9 Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores $43,421,622 $11,715,267 $31,706,355 57.5 15 Furniture Stores $25,407,690 $996,344 $24,411,346 92.5 2 Home Furnishings Stores $18,013,933 $10,718,923 $7,295,010 25.4 13 Electronics & Appliance Stores $49,869,939 $17,626,389 $32,243,550 47.8 15 Bldg Materials, Garden Equip. & Supply Stores $101,657,303 $31,946,126 $69,711,177 52.2 28 Bldg Material & Supplies Dealers $91,455,405 $24,836,604 $66,618,801 57.3 22 Lawn & Garden Equip & Supply Stores $10,201,898 $7,109,522 $3,092,376 17.9 6 Food & Beverage Stores $203,992,841 $71,428,021 $132,564,820 48.1 23 Grocery Stores $166,772,659 $51,905,277 $114,867,382 52.5 8 Specialty Food Stores $10,286,259 $2,154,202 $8,132,057 65.4 4 Beer, Wine & Liquor Stores $26,933,923 $17,368,543 $9,565,380 21.6 11 Health & Personal Care Stores $91,628,133 $22,411,233 $69,216,900 60.7 12 Gasoline Stations $138,114,753 $48,440,917 $89,673,836 48.1 12 Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores $72,910,482 $28,807,127 $44,103,355 43.4 31 Clothing Stores $48,930,743 $15,583,803 $33,346,940 51.7 22 Shoe Stores $10,193,797 $0 $10,193,797 100.0 0 Jewelry, Luggage & Leather Goods Stores $13,785,942 $13,191,567 $594,375 2.2 9 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores $41,017,804 $10,807,870 $30,209,934 58.3 12 Sporting Goods/Hobby/Musical Instr Stores $35,693,853 $9,021,925 $26,671,928 59.6 10 Book, Periodical & Music Stores $5,323,950 $1,785,946 $3,538,004 49.8 1 General Merchandise Stores $231,338,399 $15,872,083 $215,466,316 87.2 10 Department Stores Excluding Leased Depts.$174,570,783 $9,654,682 $164,916,101 89.5 1 Other General Merchandise Stores $56,767,617 $6,217,401 $50,550,216 80.3 8 Miscellaneous Store Retailers $50,280,409 $25,083,031 $25,197,378 33.4 47 Florists $3,459,149 $914,561 $2,544,588 58.2 4 Office Supplies, Stationary & Gift Stores $10,669,342 $9,460,044 $1,209,298 6.0 12 Used Merchandise Stores $6,484,743 $1,967,103 $4,517,640 53.5 7 Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers $29,667,175 $12,741,323 $16,925,852 39.9 23 Nonstore Retailers $22,120,166 $2,118,375 $20,001,791 82.5 4 Electronic Shopping & Mail-Order Houses $16,870,797 $1,246,433 $15,624,364 86.2 1 Vending Machine Operators $942,008 $230,841 $711,167 60.6 1 Direct Selling Establishments $4,307,361 $641,100 $3,666,261 74.1 2 Food Services & Drinking Places $145,778,708 $86,331,750 $59,446,958 25.6 76 Special Food Services $3,728,365 $949,922 $2,778,443 59.4 5 Drinking Places - Alcoholic Beverages $9,107,936 $3,564,223 $5,543,713 43.7 3 Restaurants/Other Eating Places $132,942,406 $81,817,605 $51,124,801 23.8 68 Sources: ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC SUMMARY EXPENDITURE TYPE Note: All figures quoted in 2016 dollars. Supply (retail sales ) estimates sales to consumers by establishments, sales to businesses are excluded. Demand (retail potential) estimates the expected amout spent by consumers at a retail establishment. Leakage/Surplus factor measures the relationship between supply and demand at ranges from +100 (total leakage) to -100 (total surplus). A positive value represents "leakage" of retail opportunity outside the trade area. A negative value represents a surplus of retail sales, a market where customers are drawn in from outside the trade area. TABLE 22 RETAIL DEMAND POTENTIAL AND LEAKAGE NAVARRE 5-MILE RADIUS 2017 Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 46 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Demand Supply Retail Gap Surplus/Leakage Number of Industry Group (NAICS Code)(Retail Potential)(Retail Sales)(Demand - Supply)Factor Businesses Total Retail Trade and Food & Drink (NAICS 44-45, 722)$273,377,507 $63,595,140 $209,782,367 62.3 39 Total Retail Trade (NAICS 44-45)$245,936,678 $59,162,800 $186,773,878 61.2 33 Total Food & Drink (NAICS 722)$27,440,829 $4,432,340 $23,008,489 72.2 6 Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers $50,578,889 $21,468,058 $29,110,831 40.4 7 Automobile Dealers $40,231,314 $1,378,783 $38,852,531 93.4 1 Other Motor Vehicle Dealers $5,803,044 $16,354,747 ($10,551,703)(47.6)2 Auto Parts, Accessories & Tire Stores $4,544,531 $3,734,528 $810,003 9.8 4 Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores $8,166,792 $3,353,614 $4,813,178 41.8 2 Furniture Stores $4,761,449 $0 $4,761,449 100.0 0 Home Furnishings Stores $3,405,343 $3,353,614 $51,729 0.8 2 Electronics & Appliance Stores $9,444,296 $3,201,648 $6,242,648 49.4 3 Bldg Materials, Garden Equip. & Supply Stores $19,381,412 $6,201,401 $13,180,011 51.5 5 Bldg Material & Supplies Dealers $17,380,098 $4,781,741 $12,598,357 56.8 4 Lawn & Garden Equip & Supply Stores $2,001,314 $1,419,660 $581,654 17.0 1 Food & Beverage Stores $37,825,732 $14,968,478 $22,857,254 43.3 3 Grocery Stores $30,734,280 $14,482,038 $16,252,242 35.9 2 Specialty Food Stores $1,894,083 $0 $1,894,083 100.0 0 Beer, Wine & Liquor Stores $5,197,369 $486,440 $4,710,929 82.9 1 Health & Personal Care Stores $17,043,787 $0 $17,043,787 100.0 0 Gasoline Stations $25,217,387 $6,279,916 $18,937,471 60.1 2 Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores $13,882,519 $0 $13,882,519 100.0 0 Clothing Stores $9,254,983 $0 $9,254,983 100.0 0 Shoe Stores $1,891,861 $0 $1,891,861 100.0 0 Jewelry, Luggage & Leather Goods Stores $2,735,675 $0 $2,735,675 100.0 0 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores $7,694,959 $1,561,511 $6,133,448 66.3 3 Sporting Goods/Hobby/Musical Instr Stores $6,689,415 $1,561,511 $5,127,904 62.1 3 Book, Periodical & Music Stores $1,005,544 $0 $1,005,544 100.0 0 General Merchandise Stores $43,125,150 $850,552 $42,274,598 96.1 2 Department Stores Excluding Leased Depts.$32,641,652 $0 $32,641,652 100.0 0 Other General Merchandise Stores $10,483,498 $850,552 $9,632,946 85.0 2 Miscellaneous Store Retailers $9,361,046 $1,029,610 $8,331,436 80.2 5 Florists $710,279 $364,997 $345,282 32.1 2 Office Supplies, Stationary & Gift Stores $2,001,624 $290,005 $1,711,619 74.7 1 Used Merchandise Stores $1,215,961 $0 $1,215,961 100.0 0 Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers $5,433,182 $374,608 $5,058,574 87.1 2 Nonstore Retailers $4,214,709 $248,012 $3,966,697 88.9 1 Electronic Shopping & Mail-Order Houses $3,185,449 $0 $3,185,449 100.0 0 Vending Machine Operators $173,941 $0 $173,941 100.0 0 Direct Selling Establishments $855,319 $248,012 $607,307 55.0 1 Food Services & Drinking Places $27,440,829 $4,432,340 $23,008,489 72.2 6 Special Food Services $691,993 $225,549 $466,444 50.8 1 Drinking Places - Alcoholic Beverages $1,778,415 $863,307 $915,108 34.6 1 Restaurants/Other Eating Places $24,970,421 $3,343,484 $21,626,937 76.4 4 Sources: ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC SUMMARY EXPENDITURE TYPE Note: All figures quoted in 2016 dollars. Supply (retail sales ) estimates sales to consumers by establishments, sales to businesses are excluded. Demand (retail potential) estimates the expected amout spent by consumers at a retail establishment. Leakage/Surplus factor measures the relationship between supply and demand at ranges from +100 (total leakage) to -100 (total surplus). A positive value represents "leakage" of retail opportunity outside the trade area. A negative value represents a surplus of retail sales, a market where customers are drawn in from outside the trade area. TABLE 23 RETAIL DEMAND POTENTIAL AND LEAKAGE ORONO CITY 2017 Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 47 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Demand Supply Retail Gap Surplus/Leakage Number of Industry Group (NAICS Code)(Retail Potential)(Retail Sales)(Demand - Supply)Factor Businesses Total Retail Trade and Food & Drink (NAICS 44-45, 722)$23,168,709,937 $24,969,872,273 ($1,801,162,336)(3.7)9,278 Total Retail Trade (NAICS 44-45)$20,858,232,830 $22,157,297,456 ($1,299,064,626)(3.0)6,390 Total Food & Drink (NAICS 722)$2,310,477,107 $2,812,574,817 ($502,097,710)(9.8)2,888 Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers $4,308,548,701 $4,935,215,848 ($626,667,147)(6.8)494 Automobile Dealers $3,446,131,266 $4,381,372,658 ($935,241,392)(11.9)192 Other Motor Vehicle Dealers $481,691,364 $241,203,595 $240,487,769 33.3 89 Auto Parts, Accessories & Tire Stores $380,726,071 $312,639,595 $68,086,476 9.8 213 Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores $671,176,633 $973,802,560 ($302,625,927)(18.4)372 Furniture Stores $404,679,267 $719,995,929 ($315,316,662)(28.0)162 Home Furnishings Stores $266,497,366 $253,806,631 $12,690,735 2.4 210 Electronics & Appliance Stores $779,650,061 $1,050,461,363 ($270,811,302)(14.8)423 Bldg Materials, Garden Equip. & Supply Stores $1,467,246,241 $1,520,171,215 ($52,924,974)(1.8)557 Bldg Material & Supplies Dealers $1,324,440,594 $1,439,612,015 ($115,171,421)(4.2)476 Lawn & Garden Equip & Supply Stores $142,805,647 $80,559,200 $62,246,447 27.9 81 Food & Beverage Stores $3,305,974,043 $3,075,748,654 $230,225,389 3.6 745 Grocery Stores $2,719,393,786 $2,448,193,873 $271,199,913 5.2 361 Specialty Food Stores $168,265,811 $171,408,676 ($3,142,865)(0.9)187 Beer, Wine & Liquor Stores $418,314,446 $456,146,105 ($37,831,659)(4.3)197 Health & Personal Care Stores $1,444,064,248 $1,457,795,870 ($13,731,622)(0.5)511 Gasoline Stations $2,267,501,559 $1,113,835,678 $1,153,665,881 34.1 247 Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores $1,142,973,158 $1,663,179,726 ($520,206,568)(18.5)1,060 Clothing Stores $774,154,614 $1,257,723,092 ($483,568,478)(23.8)725 Shoe Stores $161,601,699 $177,000,222 ($15,398,523)(4.5)120 Jewelry, Luggage & Leather Goods Stores $207,216,845 $228,456,412 ($21,239,567)(4.9)215 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores $647,455,533 $812,335,807 ($164,880,274)(11.3)531 Sporting Goods/Hobby/Musical Instr Stores $561,028,522 $691,618,003 ($130,589,481)(10.4)438 Book, Periodical & Music Stores $86,427,011 $120,717,804 ($34,290,793)(16.6)93 General Merchandise Stores $3,683,528,480 $3,118,258,947 $565,269,533 8.3 300 Department Stores Excluding Leased Depts.$2,768,054,392 $2,128,058,707 $639,995,685 13.1 103 Other General Merchandise Stores $915,474,088 $990,200,240 ($74,726,152)(3.9)197 Miscellaneous Store Retailers $799,727,609 $848,126,062 ($48,398,453)(2.9)998 Florists $45,527,447 $63,012,000 ($17,484,553)(16.1)107 Office Supplies, Stationary & Gift Stores $167,282,748 $177,651,900 ($10,369,152)(3.0)265 Used Merchandise Stores $104,884,138 $121,419,040 ($16,534,902)(7.3)163 Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers $482,033,276 $486,043,122 ($4,009,846)(0.4)463 Nonstore Retailers $340,386,564 $1,588,365,726 ($1,247,979,162)(64.7)152 Electronic Shopping & Mail-Order Houses $264,788,750 $1,542,255,474 ($1,277,466,724)(70.7)95 Vending Machine Operators $15,365,586 $18,042,785 ($2,677,199)(8.0)19 Direct Selling Establishments $60,232,228 $28,067,467 $32,164,761 36.4 38 Food Services & Drinking Places $2,310,477,107 $2,812,574,817 ($502,097,710)(9.8)2,888 Special Food Services $57,042,060 $85,543,664 ($28,501,604)(20.0)94 Drinking Places - Alcoholic Beverages $138,339,841 $116,543,152 $21,796,689 8.6 127 Restaurants/Other Eating Places $2,115,095,206 $2,610,488,001 ($495,392,795)(10.5)2,667 Sources: ESRI; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC SUMMARY EXPENDITURE TYPE Note: All figures quoted in 2016 dollars. Supply (retail sales ) estimates sales to consumers by establishments, sales to businesses are excluded. Demand (retail potential) estimates the expected amout spent by consumers at a retail establishment. Leakage/Surplus factor measures the relationship between supply and demand at ranges from +100 (total leakage) to -100 (total surplus). A positive value represents "leakage" of retail opportunity outside the trade area. A negative value represents a surplus of retail sales, a market where customers are drawn in from outside the trade area. TABLE 24 RETAIL DEMAND POTENTIAL AND LEAKAGE HENNEPIN COUNTY 2017 Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 48 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Selected Available Office Space Table 25 presents office space that is currently available for lease as of mid-November 2017 in the communities surrounding Navarre including properties in Long Lake, Mound, Orono, Shore- wood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, and Wayzata. A total of 26 properties available for lease were identified. • The selected properties range in lease rate from $10.03 Net to $45.00 NNN. • A majority (18/26) of the properties are in Wayzata and none are within Navarre. • The space available in the properties ranges from 150 square feet to 160,000 square feet. • Metro-wide, the office market continues to be soft with vacancies averaging between 15% and 18% in the Twin Cities. Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 49 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Property Name/ Address City Year Built Bldg Size Minimum Divisible Maximum Contiguous Available SF Vacancy Lease Rate 1850 Wayzata Blvd 1850 Wayzata Blvd Long Lake 1905 7,500 130 275 275 N/A $13.33 FSG 432 Mill St 432 Mill St Long Lake 1937 1,728 576 5,576 576 N/A $20.83 Gross 2350 Wayzata Blvd 2350 Wayzata Blvd Long Lake 1990 18,000 200 480 980 N/A Negotiable Freshwater Building 2500 Shadywood Rd Orono 1974 51,149 295 2,013 6,368 6,368 $17.50 Gross Casco Run 3701 Shoreline Dr Orono 1982 6,474 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 $20.00 Gross Orono Medical & Dental Center 2765 Kelley Pkwy Orono 2003 16,800 2,477 2,477 2,477 2,477 $20.00 NNN South Lake Office Building 23505 Smithtown Rd Shorewood 2007 26,036 330 673 1,003 1,003 $27.61 - $27.64 Gross Tonka Business Center 4154 Shoreline Dr Spring Park 1953 142,156 200 7,112 7,112 0 $10.50 NNN Twelve Oaks Office Center Bldg 5 1001 Twelve Oaks Center Dr Wayzata 1978 24,024 732 1,756 6,854 5,098 $10.03 - $12.53 Net Twelve Oaks Office Center Bldg 4 901 Twelve Oaks Center Dr Wayzata 1978 24,024 261 1,500 6,355 6,355 $10.03 - $15.00 Net Twelve Oaks Office Center Bldg 1 600 Twelve Oaks Center Dr Wayzata 1979 23,266 195 1,825 6,841 5,793 $11.03 - $15.70 Net Twelve Oaks Office Center Bldg 2 700 Twelve Oaks Center Dr Wayzata 1977 23,220 209 1,758 4,040 3,437 $11.25 - $13.80 Net Wayzata Crossings 1415 E Wayzata Blvd Wayzata 1970 35,000 840 7,000 7,840 7,000 $12.00 - $17.00 Net Twelve Oaks Office Center Bldg 3 801 Twelve Oaks Ctr Wayzata 1978 24,024 299 496 1,135 1,135 $12.53 Net Wayzata Executive Park Bldg 3 1907 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata 2001 42,110 1,910 5,168 8,639 6,729 $16.00 NNN Wayzata Executive Park Bldg 2 1905 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata 2001 37,806 5,979 5,979 5,979 5,979 $16.00 NNN Arne Professional Building 101 W Lake St Wayzata 1996 9,316 150 150 150 150 $24.00 NNN 100 West Lake 100 Lake St Wayzata 1997 12,000 6,355 10,648 10,648 0 $30.00 Net Wayzata Specialty Center 1120 E Wayzata Blvd Wayzata N/A 16,000 1,500 16,000 16,000 16,000 $30.00 NNN Wayzata Marquee Place 641 Lake St Wayzata 1987 56,000 192 192 192 192 $35.00 Gross 445 Lake St E 445 Lake St E Wayzata 1988 37,710 3,000 6,330 6,330 0 $40.00 - $45.00 NNN 701 Building 701 Lake St Wayzata 2004 25,000 3,005 3,005 3,005 3,005 $48.00 Gross 201 Lake Street-Westway Building 201 Lake St Wayzata 1997 33,220 2,466 2,466 2,466 2,466 Negotiable 326-332 Broadway Ave 326 Broadway Ave Wayzata N/A 17,899 2,420 6,541 11,971 11,971 Negotiable 315 Lake St E 315 Lake St Wayzata 2009 28,000 2,055 2,055 2,055 0 Negotiable NNN Piper Jaffray Building 319 Barry Ave Wayzata 1988 29,754 1,895 1,895 1,895 1,895 Negotiable NNN TABLE 25 SELECTED AVAILABLE OFFICE SPACE OUTSIDE NAVARRE Sources: Xceligent; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 50 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Selected Available Retail Space Table 27 presents retail space that is currently available for lease as of mid-November 2017 in the area outside Navarre including properties in Long Lake, Mound, Orono, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, and Wayzata. A total of 18 properties available for lease were identified. • The selected properties range in lease rate from $12.00 Net to $40.00 Net. • A majority (8/18) of the properties are in Wayzata and none are within Navarre. City Number of Properties Available For Lease Average Bldg Size Average Available SF Lease Rates Long Lake 3 9,076 610 $13.33 FSG - $20.83 Gross Mound 0 N/A N/A N/A Orono 3 24,807 3,281 $17.50 Gross - $20.00 NNN Shorewood 1 26,036 1,003 $27.61 Gross - $27.64 Gross Spring Park 1 142,156 7,112 $10.50 NNN Tonka Bay 0 N/A N/A N/A Wayzata 18 27,687 5,689 $10.03 Net - $45.00 NNN Sources: Xceligent; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC TABLE 26 SELECTED AVAILABLE OFFICE SPACE OUTSIDE NAVARRE Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 51 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Property Name/ Address City Specific Use Bldg Size Gross Land Area Year Built Tenancy Minimum Divisible Maximum Contiguous Available SF Vacancy Lease Rate Taxes/SF Operating Expenses/S F Tax Year 2073 A Wayzata Blvd 2073 W Wayzata Blvd Long Lake Freestanding 2,587 98,446 2005 Single-Tenant 1,000 2,587 2,587 2,587 $12.00 - $20.00 NNN $5.28 $5.55 2016 Mound Marketplace 2131 Commerce Blvd Mound Neighborhood Ctr 52,879 270,407 2003 Multi-Tenant 1,597 2,985 6,580 6,580 $18.00 - $22.00 Net $4.95 $3.90 2017 Commerce Place - Retail 2200 Commerce Blvd Mound Conv/Strip Ctr 40,053 14,375 1986 Multi-Tenant 839 17,504 28,789 28,789 $8.00 - $18.00 Net $1.77 $2.98 2017 Shorewood Village Center 23470 Highway 7 Shorewood Neighborhood Ctr 62,308 286,189 1975 Multi-Tenant 1,419 3,393 6,435 6,435 Negotiable NNN $4.71 $6.49 2017 Waterford Center 19905 Highway 7 Shorewood Conv/Strip Ctr 22,930 147,233 1994 Multi-Tenant 1,500 5,706 7,206 7,206 $16.50 NNN N/A $7.23 2016 Marina Center 4669 Shoreline Dr Spring Park Conv/Strip Ctr 47,135 507,038 1964 Multi-Tenant 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 $12.00 Net $3.85 $2.12 2016 Lakeview Lofts 4100 Spring St Spring Park Neighborhood Ctr 60,000 24,019 2005 Multi-Tenant 3,964 3,964 3,964 3,964 $23.00 NNN N/A N/A N/A Marina Center - Pad Site 4659 Shoreline Dr Spring Park Freestanding 9,120 87,120 N/A Multi-Tenant 1,680 9,120 9,120 9,120 Negotiable N/A N/A N/A Tonka Village Shopping Center 24324 Smithtown Rd Tonka Bay Neighborhood Ctr 25,000 273,992 N/A Single-Tenant 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Negotiable NNN $3.45 $4.04 2017 Tonka Village Shopping Center 5609 Manitou Rd Tonka Bay Neighborhood Ctr 37,126 283,140 1959 Multi-Tenant 1,823 7,441 9,264 9,264 Negotiable NNN $3.45 $4.04 2017 Wayzata Marquee Place 603 Lake St E Wayzata Mixed Use 72,000 24,394 1946 Multi-Tenant 600 1,289 1,889 1,889 $25.00 NNN $12.00 $8.68 2017 1330 Wayzata Blvd 1330 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata General 4,500 29,621 N/A Multi-Tenant 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 $40.00 Net $3.00 $7.00 2017 240 Minnetonka Unit 103 240 Minnetonka Wayzata Other 1,094 N/A N/A Single-Tenant 1,094 1,094 1,094 1,094 $25.00 NNN N/A N/A N/A The Promenade of Wayzata 801 E Lake St Wayzata Community Ctr 108,739 632,491 2014 Multi-Tenant 984 20,588 65,665 65,665 Negotiable NNN $11.72 $4.69 2017 Wayzata Village Shoppes 812 Lake St Wayzata Neighborhood Ctr 43,127 119,790 1964 Multi-Tenant 1,215 1,215 1,215 1,215 Negotiable NNN $7.29 $4.25 2017 240 Minnetonka Unit 102 240 Minnetonka Ave S Wayzata Other 734 25,000 N/A Multi-Tenant 734 734 734 734 $25.00 NNN N/A N/A N/A Colonial Square Shopping Center 1125 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata Neighborhood Ctr 93,338 325,393 1959 Multi-Tenant 1,313 1,313 1,313 1,313 Negotiable NNN $8.85 $3.69 2017 Cross Creek Shoppes 748 E Lake St Wayzata General 10,145 28,314 1968 Multi-Tenant 1,239 2,994 4,233 4,233 Negotiable NNN N/A $16.00 2017 Sources: Xceligent; Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC TABLE 27 SELECTED FOR LEASE RETAIL SPACE OUTSIDE NAVARRE Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 52 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Conclusions The impetus for this study was to complete a high-level initial analysis of the future develop- ment potential in Navarre. Previous sections examined the demographic, economic, and mar- ket performance of various real estate uses in the Navarre area. This section summarizes the market potential findings and makes recommendations on the most appropriate product types that may be captured in Navarre. Potential Redevelopment Sites Maxfield Research & Consulting, together with WSB, identified potential areas is Navarre that could support redevelopment. Table 28 identifies parcels of interest sorted into seven poten- tial redevelopment areas. The table shows the parcel address and PID, owner, acreage, land use, last date of sale (if applicable), and current market values and property taxes. The redevel- opment areas range in size from 1.86 acres up to 6.78 acres. The following summarizes the re- development sites and the potential land uses that could result. • Site #1: The first site is the western-most site in Navarre located just north of Shoreline Drive and south of the 6.4-acre Hennepin County property. This redevelopment consists of five parcels that comprise about 3.7 acres and include a mix of commercial and resi- dential properties. Most of the property is about 200-feet deep off Shoreline Drive. Recommended land uses could include: o Mid-rise housing o Stand-alone commercial sites o Small retail center Because of the traffic along Shoreline Drive, this site would be accessed by a “right-in right-out” and could experience a longer wait time to make a left turn out of the site. • Site #2: This property consists of three properties that collectively are about 4.5-acres. These sites are not presently on the tax rolls and are either tax forfeited properties or owned by the City of Orono. The site is wooded and located directly to the north of the Navarre Fire Department and west of a for-sale townhome development. The site also abuts the railroad track to the north. Recommended land uses could include: o For-sale twin homes or villas o Attached for-sale townhomes o Mid-rise housing Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 53 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Number Address Owner Name Land Type Year Built Sale Date Sale Price Acres Market Value Total Taxes Total 1 3890 Shoreline Dr E J & M J Held Residential 1991 Mar-93 $105,000 0.68 $320,000 $3,361 2 3860 Shoreline Dr David Umbehocker Commercial-Preferred 1930 N/A $0 0.64 $196,000 $5,272 3 3850 Shoreline Dr Leeryan Of Minneapolis LLC Commercial-Preferred 1987 Nov-02 $790,000 0.78 $759,000 $23,802 4 3800 Shoreline Dr M E Brewer & B L Brewer Commercial-Preferred 1956 Jun-01 $239,900 0.70 $290,000 $8,366 5 38 Address Unassigned City Of Orono Vacant Land-Residential N/A N/A $0 0.86 $0 $0 Total 3.66 $1,565,000 $40,801 6 38 Address Unassigned Hennepin Forfeited Land Vacant Land-Residential N/A N/A $0 0.10 $0 $0 7 38 Address Unassigned Hennepin Forfeited Land Vacant Land-Residential N/A N/A $0 0.15 $0 $0 8 3770 Shoreline Dr City of Orono Commercial-Preferred 2003 N/A $0 4.33 $0 $0 Total 4.58 $0 $0 9 3542 Shoreline Dr Shoreline-Navarre LLC Commercial-Preferred 1986 Sep-04 $35,000 0.46 $528,000 $16,199 10 3502 Shoreline Dr Lowell R Zitzloff Commercial-Non Preferred 1950 Apr-82 $60,981 0.31 $289,000 $9,512 11 3574 Shoreline Dr R L & G H Plaisted Commercial-Preferred 1959 Jan-03 $561,705 0.47 $183,000 $4,844 12 3572 Shoreline Dr Leis In Grace LLC Commercial-Preferred 1947 Aug-13 $250,000 0.31 $226,000 $6,260 13 3496 Shoreline Dr Skyt Properties LLC Commercial-Preferred 1979 Nov-13 $320,000 0.31 $339,000 $9,979 Total 1.86 $1,565,000 $46,793 14 3416 Shoreline Dr Germ-Tom Partnership Commercial-Preferred 1955 Jul-87 $360,000 0.54 $581,000 $18,368 15 3400 Shoreline Dr 3400 Properties LLC Commercial-Preferred 1954 Feb-07 $375,000 0.29 $643,000 $19,984 16 3440 Shoreline Dr Richard W Bloomquist Residential 1951 Aug-99 $122,000 0.15 $215,000 $3,984 17 2377 Shadywood Rd Lake Country Corp Investment Commercial-Preferred 2005 Sep-15 $387,000 0.24 $378,000 $11,262 18 38 Address Unassigned City Of Orono Vacant Land-Commercial N/A N/A $0 0.47 $0 $0 19 3360 Shoreline Dr Leroy David Koehnen Commercial-Preferred 1969 Oct-84 $155,000 0.44 $383,000 $11,427 20 2385 Shadywood Rd S H Schmidt/S J Schmidt Trst Commercial-Preferred 1937 N/A $0 0.18 $197,000 $5,305 *3400 Shoreline Dr 3400 Properties LLC Commercial-Preferred 1954 Feb-07 $375,000 0.29 $643,000 $19,984 Total 2.60 $2,397,000 $90,315 21 2474 Carman St W E Edwards & D M Edwards Tr Residential Lake Shore 1990 N/A $0 2.00 $1,130,000 $13,601 22 2480 Carman St R A Edwards Et Al Trustees Residential Lake Shore 1965 N/A $0 2.24 $1,116,000 $13,418 23 3465 Shoreline Dr Navarre Realty LLC Apartment 1952 Jan-80 $210,000 0.96 $795,000 $17,384 24 3423 Shoreline Dr Brook Investment Group LLC Commercial-Preferred 1952 Nov-07 $1,700,000 1.58 $782,000 $24,688 Total 6.78 $3,823,000 $69,091 25 2455 Shadywood Rd Jeanne M Englund Vacant Land-Commercial N/A N/A $0 0.88 $137,000 $3,432 26 2465 Shadywood Rd David J Delaney Trustee Seasonal-Residential Rec 1920 Dec-09 $205,000 1.34 $164,000 $1,766 Total 2.22 $301,000 $5,199 27 2520 Shadywood Rd Ugorets 8098 LLC Vacant Land-Residential N/A N/A $0 2.63 $0 $0 Total 2.63 $0 $0 * The Narrows Saloon Source: Realist Tax; Maxfield Research & Consulting,LLC Potential Redevelopment Area 4 Potential Redevelopment Area 5 Potential Redevelopment Area 6 Potential Redevelopment Area 7 TABLE 28 PARCELS OF INTEREST NAVARRE Potential Redevlopment Area 1 Potential Redevlopment Area 2 Potential Redevelopment Area 3 Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 54 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 55 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Sites of Interest for Redevelopment 2 3 9 10 11 12 Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 56 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC 14 15 16 19 23 24 Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 57 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC 27 • Site #3: The third redevelopment area consists of five commercial properties that make-up 1.86 total acres; the smallest redevelopment area. Most of the commercial buildings are dated as they were constructed between 1947 and 1986. All of the prop- erties have frontage on Shoreline Drive and are surrounding by housing land uses to the north of the parcels. This area would have access and visibility to Shoreline Drive mo- torists; however, it will be challenging making left turns out of the site. Recommended land uses could include: o Mid-rise housing o Modest commercial development • Site #4: Located at the northwest quadrant of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road; this redevelopment area has the potential be the “gateway” into the Navarre neighbor- hood. The property is at “main and main” and benefits from higher traffic counts and excellent access and visibility from both roadways. As a result, this site could be the cor- nerstone for future redevelopment in Navarre. Collectively the site is 2.6 acres across eight parcels. Most of the existing uses are commercial, however there are two com- mercial uses located in low-density residential structures. Because of this location, this site should be the top priority for attracting redevelopment in Navarre. Recommended land uses could include: o Commercial concentration – front loaded design towards the roadways (parking in rear) o Mixed-use or multi-use development with a mid-rise housing component Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 58 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC • Site #5. This potential redevelopment area also has Shoreline Drive frontage, however on the south side of the roadway. The site is anchored by the east parcel that contains 1.58 acres and is adjacent to the Lunds/Byerly’s. The site encompasses four parcels with 6.78-acres; however, two the properties are zoned residential lake shore that could be subdivided and maintained by the current land owner. As a result, the total developable is about 5.75 acres should the lakeshore properties subdivide the property to align with the two other commercial properties. Recommended land uses could include: o Commercial development o Mid-rise housing development o Mixed-use development featuring housing and first-level commercial space • Site #6. Along Shadywood Road about one block south of the Lunds/Byerly’s are two parcels that comprise 2.2 acres. Both properties have thick vegetation to the west and could be combined to create a more marketable site. Recommended land uses could include: o Stand-alone commercial building o Smaller mid-rise housing development. • Site #7. A vacant 2.6-acre site is in the far southeastern boundary of Navarre area. The property is east of Shadywood Road and south of the five-acre commercial site located directly north of the site. The site has the potential to be the gateway into Navarre for the northbound traveler on Shadywood Road. Recommended land uses could include: o Stand-alone commercial development o Mid-rise housing development o Mixed-use development – 1st floor commercial with housing Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 59 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC Recommended Real Estate Types The previous section outlined the seven potential redevelopment areas. Many of the proper- ties could encompass a few different land use types given their location, access, and surround- ing land uses. The recommended product types that are recommended include: • Retail: As illustrated in the earlier leakage figures, Navarre and the Lake Minnetonka area is under-retailed. Navarre has an opportunity to capture these retail sales on prop- erty either Shoreline Drive or Shadywood Road. Among all the redevelopment areas, the site at the northwest quadrant of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road has the greatest potential to capture commercial tenants. However, this site will likely need to attract regional or national tenants given the site acquisition and development costs at this location. These credit-worthy tenants will have the means to pay higher lease rates that will be required to support redevelopment. Other sites in Navarre are more likely to cater to “niche or boutique” retailers that may have fled other higher-rent properties in other Lake Minnetonka communities. Because the Navarre area and Orono show leakage in nearly every category of retail sales; Navarre can support more retail than what could be developed given the acreage available within redevelopment sites identified. Several of the identified sites could support retail and there would still be excess demand for retail goods and services. Re- development sites #4 and #5 will be the most attractive sites for retail tenants. Site Combined Mid-rise TH Commercial Retail Mixed Use/ Area Acres Housing Housing Component Component Multi-Use 1 3.66 x x 2 4.58 x x 3 1.86 x x 4 2.60 x x x x 5 6.78 x x x x 6 2.22 x x 7 2.63 x x x Source: Maxfield Research & Consulting, LLC TABLE 29 SUMMARY OF REDEVELOPMENT SITE POTENTIAL USES Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 60 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC • Office: An office building with a build-to-suit tenant would be an excellent land use for several of the identified sites. However, this will be predicated on the ability to secure a single tenant who will commit to a built-to-suit office structure. The multi-tenant office market continues to be very soft with high vacancies and with rents that cannot support new construction costs. The office market continues to be the soft spot in the Twin Cit- ies commercial real estate market and that is likely to continue in the short-term as companies squeeze square footages and more employees work remotely. Since the of- fice market is the weakest commercial real estate product type in the Metro Area; office space will be more challenging to develop in Navarre unless a single-tenant user seeks out new construction. • Hospitality: The Twin Cities is experiencing a major building boom in the hospitality sec- tor due to a variety of conditions: 2018 Super Bowl, future Final Four, and improved economic conditions. However, with all the new supply occupancies have peaked and the hotel market is at equilibrium. If a site had lake access a small, boutique hotel could be considered in Navarre; however, since a lake site is unavailable we do not recom- mend a hotel concept at any of the identified locations. • For-Sale Townhomes: Because townhomes require a lower density than traditional mul- tifamily housing; most of the sites would not be well-suited for townhomes. Townhome land costs are usually lower than other multifamily densities hence the financial return on townhomes would be lower than other housing types located in multi-story con- cepts. However, the site just north of the fire station would make an excellent location for for-sale housing – either a townhome, twinhome, or villa style concept. The site would be well-received for a for-sale housing concept. Based on the site acreage of about 4.6 sites; this site may be able to accommodate upwards of 35 to 45 attached townhome units. • For-Sale Condominiums: The condominium market is ripe for new development as the market was hit hard from the recession and from the lack of new construction from the state law governing condominium development. However, this past year the Minnesota Legislature recently modified the condominium state statute that is resulting in condo- minium developers looking to re-enter the market. New condo construction has fo- cused on the upper-end of the market in Downtown Wayzata and Downtown Minneap- olis. Condominiums in Orono would be well-received and would provide an excellent product for existing residents to downsize from larger lake homes for maintenance-free living. As a result, we find a condominium development would be well-received in Na- varre and would serve a niche in the marketplace. Suburban condominium development should be able to support densities of about 20 to 30 units per acre. Mr. Eric Zweber December 19, 2017 WSB & Associates, Inc. Page 61 MAXFIELD RESEARCH AND CONSULTING, LLC • Senior Housing: Long-term the senior housing outlook is very promising given the aging of the population and future demographic shifts. Orono and the Lake Minnetonka area has an older demographic with significant growth in the 65+ population. However, there are several service-based senior housing communities located within five miles of Navarre that would compete with a new development in Navarre. At that same time, there may be an opportunity for active-adult products such as an age-restricted rental, for-sale 55+ condominium, or senior cooperative. However, the Navarre area can likely support one active adult product in the short-term. Suburban senior housing projects are averaging about 25 units or more per acre across the Metro Area. • Rental Housing: Navarre and Orono have few rental properties; the City of Orono has an 85% home ownership rate and the majority of rentals are located in single-family housing stock. The Twin Cities is experiencing a major rental housing building boom as rental housing has been a preferred asset class over the past seven years, however the majority of new construction has been located in locations closer to the core. The Na- varre area may be able to support one rental housing development; however, because of development costs a new rental concept would have high rents targeting lifestyle renters. Many of these renters could be from the 55+ demographic who want to down- size from their single-family home. Rental housing could be developed in a stand-alone building or as part of a mixed-use development with first-level commercial space. New suburban rental properties in the Metro Area vary considerably between the inner- ring communities and the outer-ring communities. Densities closer to the core are aver- aging over 50 units per acre; whereas densities in the third-tiers and beyond are averag- ing 25 to 40 units per acre. Combined with properties in the two core cities; the average density for new apartments in the entire Metro Area is 74 units per acre for all new de- velopment in 2017. Navarre Community Engagement Open House: November 16, 2017 Community Text Responses Describe Navarre as it exists today in just three words What three things do you love the most about Navarre? What are the top three things you would change about Navarre? Drive-thru Small town feel (3) Create some character for Navarre - it is a blank slate Old growth woods You know everyone Lighting - more pedestrian (2) Small The new remodeled storefronts of Narrows is a nice look Streetscape - planters, Christmas trees, benches Crossroads of lake (2) Walking all year round - sidewalks clean and plowed in winter Crosswalk - very dangerous Up north feeling Everything you need right there - Lund's, liquor store, gas station Make it pedestrian friendly! (4) Autopart store central Location (easy drive to downtown Minneapolis, center of Lake Minnetonka, urban yet woodsy feel)More of a town square feeling Dakota trail (3)Nicer storefronts Lake Create a sense of place Can walk to fill many retail needs from home Increase local businesses and move toward an exterior design patate over time Lund's Landscape on County Road 15 - too much concrete Narrows Restaurant or coffee shop 1 Navarre Community Engagement Open House: November 16, 2017 Key Strategies Priority Matrix Highest Priority Continue the tradition of Navarre Restiral Planned for a future where it was safe to walk and bike and had a zoning/use code that favored local retail like a bike shop Made Navarre unique! Walkability and safety They planned for a future where people were walking and biking - not driving! We need more businesses that serve the community not office space, not apartment buildings or senior living - seniors do not spend any money, they will not revitalize the town - please don't make the same mistakees as Spring Park or Wayzata - tax income over common sense. Excelsior is a good example, charming Design standards, service businesses for area residents, sit down restaurant Design standards Someone champion community events/improvements Human-scale development Better sense of community - more widespread enthusiasm and support for social and recreational activities They thought about the environment. They didn't put parking lots everywhere. They worked to redesign downtown to be more walking friendly - less concrete, more landscaping Use standards for retail Very little multifamily and only over retail Lower Priority 2 Navarre Community Engagement Open House: November 16, 2017 Spectrum Survey Average Ranking (Strongly Agree = 1; Strongly Disagree = 5) Category by Average Ranking Percent Agree or Strongly Agree I plan to live in Navarre for the forseeable future.1.5 I strongly agree 100% I would recommend Navarre as a great place to live.1.9 I agree 90% Navarre needs more businesses.2.0 I agree 89% Sidewalks and trails are well-maintained.2.7 No opinion/neutral 56% There is adequate parking.3.0 No opinion/neutral 50% I can walk to the places I need to go.2.9 No opinion/neutral 44% Navarre is the Downtown of Orono.3.1 No opinion/neutral 44% Navarre should be vibrant and active day, night, and on weekends.2.8 No opinion/neutral 44% There is a strong sense of community.3.4 No opinion/neutral 27% I feel comfortable as a pedestrian.3.7 I disagree 33% There is a need for greater variety in housing options.3.9 I disagree 14% Navarre needs more residents.3.6 I disagree 11% 3 Navarre Community Engagement Survey Monkey Online Engagement Survey Monkey Responses Number Percent Number Number Percent I am a resident of Navarre 20 77%0 0 Annual Festival 15 62.50% I am a resident outside of Navarre, but in Orono 4 15%1 2 Quarterly/Holiday shopping events 10 41.67% I am not a resident of Orono 2 8%2 5 Races/Events centered around the Dakota Rail Trail 11 45.83% I own or operate a business in Navarre 1 4%3 7 Enhanced branding for Navarre 15 62.50% 4 3 Cultural events 7 29.17% 5 9 Average 3.4615385 Please check the following boxes that accurately describe you Rate your desire to see regular community events in Navarre from 1-5 (1 = not at all desired, 5 = very desired) What types of events would you like to see in Navarre? 4 Navarre Community Engagement Survey Monkey Online Engagement Survey Monkey Responses Number Percent Number Number Percent Yes 16 61.54%0 2 Preservation of existing neighborhood character 11 57.89% No 4 15.38%1 8 Building massing 7 36.84% I have not thought about it 6 23.08%2 4 Building height 9 47.37% 3 3 Loss of affordable housing 7 36.84% 4 8 Issues related to construction 8 42.11% 5 0 Average 2.28 Regarding the tear down and rebuild of single-family homes in Navarre, which of the following issues are important to you? Overall, please rate your level of concern regarding the teardown and rebuild of single-family homes in Navarre from 1-5 (1 = not at all concerned, 5 = very concerned). Do you consider Navarre the Downtown of Orono? 5 Navarre Community Engagement Survey Monkey Online Engagement Survey Monkey Responses Number Number Number Percent 0 3 0 2 Affordable housing 4 16.67% 1 8 1 4 Provision of additional business types and services 15 62.50% 2 4 2 5 Places to go and things to do in Navarre 21 87.50% 3 2 3 4 Increased population density 7 29.17% 4 5 4 7 Building heights of 3 stories or more 4 16.67% 5 4 5 4 Average 2.384615 Average 2.8461538 Rate your desire for new multi-family residential and commercial development in Navarre from 1-5 (1 = not at all desired, 5 = very desired). Regarding new multi-family residential and commercial development in Navarre, which of the following characteristics are desirable? Rate your desire for new multi- family residential and commercial development in the City of Orono from 1-5 (1 = not at all desired, 5 = 6 Navarre Community Engagement Survey Monkey Online Engagement Survey Monkey Responses Number Percent Affordable housing 5 22.73%Provision of additional business types and 13 59.09% Places to go and things to do in Orono 19 86.36% Increased population density 3 13.64% Building heights of 3 stories or more 4 18.18% Just like Minneapolis we need revitalization - tear them down I think its great to have old dilapidated homes torn down and lovely new single family homes replace them No concerns, but single family housing ONLY (no apartments) Wide variety of housing is important New development must conform to the neighborhood current density No affordable housing at ALL!! No apartments! NOT multi-family residential any place if its not broke; don't fix it Pedestrian and bike connections across the community I'm for anything that improves the quality and value of the housing stock. Tear downs are good. Construction site mtc is important, but easily dealt with Build more beautiful new homes Holiday market, car show… Outdoor music in the park in the summer weekend afternoons I think any and all community events are important Comments main concern is pressure on existing infrastructure, damage to lake, inadequate roads better support of existing business walkability, connection to other neighborhoods and amenities Regarding new multi-family residential and commercial development in the City of Orono, which of the following characteristics are desired? 7 8 38 37 41 42 42 45 39 43 40 43 49 39 44 35 9 33 41 45 36 8 Navarre Community Engagement Social Pinpoint Online Engagement Social Pinpoint Map Responses Places I Like to Go/Be Trouble Spots: Places I Avoid Good Location for a new Amenity or Development 39 Great park - wonderful job 33 Really didn't need another auto parts store. Navarre and community can have a better image than 3 gas stations and 2 auto part stores 39 Put a land bridge over 15 to connect the neighborhoods 43 New to area, use all the services, improve store fronts 9 Too much concrete, need it developed to host pop-ups?37 New park location on both sides of the road 41 Would be nice to have a nice entry point and better signage at the entry to the trail 8 Wasted space/find a better location for co shop!40 On the main drag - need better Christmas decorations! There were even lights strung across the street. Also need pretty planters 42 Love the trail - non traffic wonderful place to ride, easy accessibility 49 Beautification of street and sidewalk - Great start with new light fixtures and banners - however, they are too high for pedestrian enjoyment and not at people scale. Need a consistent plan for plantings to create some neighborhood charm and character - I have a design background and have done lots of master planning and lighting for places like Edinborough Park - Edina, Minneapolis/St. Paul airport, and landscaping 45 Central gathering place 36 Direct access to Lake Minnetonka in Navarre, either a park or residential development 44 Pedestrian only, like a square, gathering spot, benches/fountain, meeting place 42 Add/develop new businesses on the Dakota Trail 45 Great land to have a walking path to town 9 Navarre Community Engagement Social Pinpoint Online Engagement Social Pinpoint Map Responses 41 Need better shops - especially on south side of street 43 Sit down restaurant option, nice casual dining 38 More multiple unit housing/city controlled already 35 Empty lot since 1965 tornado, not attractive. Great spot for development. Can't we get Champion auto parts to do something with their building? Disappointed that Patrick's bakery idea was turned down. It was an opportunity to have a slightly more upscale coffee shop/restaurant that is pleasant and not filled with contractors. 10 Planning Level Urban Roadway Capacities Facility Type Daily Two-way Volume (vehicles) Lower Threshold Higher Threshold Arterials Two lane undivided 10,000 12,000 Two lane divided or Three lane undivided 15,000 17,000 Four lane undivided 18,000 22,000 Four lane divided or five lane undivided 28,000 32,000 Freeways Four lane freeway 60,000 80,000 Six lane freeway 90,000 120,000 Eight lane freeway or higher Calculated on a segment by segment basis CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 3C HOUSING PLAN Introduction 3C-2 2040 Regional Framework 3C-2 Figure 3C-1 Community Designation 3C-3 Basic Housing Concepts and Principles 3C-4 Table 3C-1: Population and Households 1970-2040 3C-6 Summary of Existing Housing Statistics 3C-7 Table 3C-2: Dwelling Units by Type (2005-2016) 3C-7 Table 3C-3: Owner/Renter Statistics (2000-2015) 3C-8 Table 3C-4: Age of Existing Housing Stock 3C-8 Table 3C-5: Housing Demolitions 3C-9 Table 3C-6: Valuation of Owner-Occupied Units 3C-9 Figure 3C-2 Owner Occupied Housing by Est. Mkt Value 3C-10 Table 3C-7: Housing Cost Burden Households 3C-11 Table 3C-8: Cost Burdened Households 3C-11 Housing Needs Identification 3C-11 Housing Implementation Plan 3C-12 Housing Action Plan 3C-14 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 2 CMP PART 3C HOUSING PLAN INTRODUCTION An increasing priority of national, regional and local concern is for the provision of an adequate supply of safe, affordable housing for all citizens. Land costs and other development factors suggest that these affordable and lifecycle housing needs can most practically be addressed within the urban areas of Orono. A secondary concern is that much of Orono’s existing affordable housing is aging, and there is an increasing need for neighborhood preservation and housing rehabilitation. The Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires that local comprehensive plans include "official controls and land use planning to promote the availability of land for the development of low and moderate income housing" (Minn. Stat. Sec. 473.859, Subd. 2). To further address housing needs, the Minnesota Legislature in 1995 enacted the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (LCA), establishing a fund for communities to invest in local economic revitalization and affordable housing initiatives. The Act provided for funding in three specific areas: cleaning up polluted land; revitalizing communities and promoting efficient development; and providing housing affordable to people with moderate incomes. As the Metropolitan Area continues to grow, the provision of adequate housing poses ongoing challenges for local and regional governments. The three primary facets of the problem include: 1. Supply - Inadequate supply of lower-cost housing in good condition; 2. Location - Concentration of low and moderate income housing in the core cities and inner suburbs; and 3. Affordability - A widening gap between the price of housing and income. 2040 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Accommodating future growth of the Metro Area is a concern that will require wide-ranging resources. The Metropolitan Council in 2014 adopted its “Thrive MSP 2040” to provide a plan for addressing the challenges that will be faced by the Twin Cities area over the next two decades in accommodating expected growth in the region. In addressing the challenges of growth, Metropolitan Council has acknowledged that a “one size fits all” approach to implementing the Regional Development Framework is not appropriate, and has designated Geographic Planning Areas to identify communities with similar types of growth. CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 3 Figure 3C-1: Community Designations CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 4 Community Designation Orono has been classified as a mix between Rural Residential and Emerging Suburban Edge. Within the “Rural Residential”, Metropolitan Council’s role includes encouraging rural development patterns that will protect natural resources and preserve areas where post 2040 growth can be provided with cost-effective and efficient urban infrastructure, and work with communities to plan development patterns that will protect natural resources and water quality and quantity, and maintain existing contiguous lots that are 10 or more acres in size. The local community’s role is to: 1. Discourage future development of rural residential patterns (unsewered lots of 2.5 acres or less) and where opportunities exist, plan for rural development at densities that are not greater than 1 unit per 10 acres. 2. Implement conservation subdivision ordinances, cluster development ordinances, and environmental protection provisions in local land use ordinances, consistent with the Council’s flexible residential development guidelines. 3. Promote best management practices for stormwater management, habitat restoration, and natural resource conservation in development plans and projects. The Metropolitan Council has established Orono’s growth forecasts for the Planning term. Orono’s populations is anticipated to increase to 9,500 persons by 2040, an increase of 1,800 persons from 2016 levels. See also Table 3C-1 in this Chapter. As an Emerging Suburban Edge, local government’s role is 1. Plan and stage development for forecasted growth through 2040 and beyond at overall average net densities of at least 3-5 dwelling units per acre in the community. Target higher-intensity developments in areas with better access to regional sewer and transportation infrastructure, connections to local commercial activity centers, transit facilities, and recreational amenities. 2. Identify and protect an adequate supply of land to support growth for future development beyond 2040, with regard to agricultural viability and natural and historic resources preservation. 3. Incorporate best management practices for stormwater management and natural resources conservation and restoration in planning processes. 4. Plan for local infrastructure needs including those needed to support future growth. BASIC HOUSING CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES This Housing Plan is an indication of the ongoing policies and concerns of Orono residents toward addressing our own housing goals while taking considered and appropriate measures to address regional housing concerns. This Plan is a refinement and restatement of the planning direction established in the 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Guide Plan, and updated in 1980, 2000, and 2008. CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 5 The Housing Plan is an integral part of Orono's Community Management Plan. The policy decisions relating to Orono's housing improvement programs complement and balance regional plans with local concerns for historic development patterns, environmental protection, public health, fiscal responsibility and general land use. Orono's urban and rural areas provide distinctly different lifestyles, amenities and services which jointly characterize the community as a whole. Each area has separate planning priorities and separate environmental considerations. Urban areas and urban services will not be permitted to encroach on or destroy the rural area of the city. Orono has acknowledged the need for a wider range of housing alternative and has taken steps to provide new locations for development of urban density housing where it will not be in conflict with the rural area. Many of these areas have been guided or rezoned to allow for appropriate urban housing densities and have become a part of Orono's urban area. Orono's land use plan calls for development in both the urban and the rural portions of the City. The urban area will see new residential development on the existing vacant lots and undeveloped parcels similar to the forms of development typical of the closer-in suburbs. Opportunities exist for substantial rehabilitation projects in the older urban neighborhoods and for scattered-site new construction of affordable and lifecycle housing units. Overall urban density will not increase dramatically because of the ecological considerations of proximity to Lake Minnetonka. The rural area will see continued residential development at a steady pace. Strict subdivision review will ensure adequate retention of privately owned and maintained open space, wetland conservation, and on- site sewage treatment system site evaluation. The typical rural lot will continue to provide for a rural lifestyle as the low investment in public services continues to make the land competitive with more fully developed suburban properties. Orono's land use plans and programs allow new urban and rural developments to provide comparable cost housing opportunities. The projected population numbers for 2020 through 2040 shown in Table 3C-1 reflect the gradually decreasing size of the typical household, reduced from 3.16 persons per household (PPH) in 1970 to 2.63 PPH at the 2010 census. Household sizes are projected to shrink even further to a level of 2.47 PPH by 2030. Orono’s 2030 population projection of 8,800 reflects an estimated 3,560 households at 2.47 persons per household. In Orono, the Land Use Plan is the determinant factor in future growth, rather than allowing growth to drive the Land Use Plan. This is the cornerstone of Orono’s long-term development philosophy and policies. CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 6 Table 3C-1: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 4,429 -- 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2,950 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9,500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 1,780 -- 2,105 2,455 2,785 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 1046 -- 1,095 1,105 1,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,037 3,200 3,560 3,900 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.53 2.47 2.44 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement Orono's land use plan accommodates all planned population growth in a variety of housing opportunities. The forecast population increase of approximately 2,000 persons in the next twenty years translates into a housing demand of approximately 800 new dwelling units. This average of 40 new dwellings per year is consistent with Orono's rate of building permit issuance during the past two decades. Based on the Land Use Plan, approximately two-thirds of these new units are expected to develop in the urban area. Successful development of a wide range of housing alternatives is directly related to the ability to obtain the necessary infrastructure and public services. Affordable housing and many forms of lifecycle housing are most appropriate at urban densities where services, employment, and transportation are available, without the need for an automobile. In Orono, with urban infrastructure such as municipal sewer and water, and the wide range of urban services not available to 80% of Orono planned for low- density rural residential development, affordable housing may not be practical. New housing alternatives in Orono are anticipated to occur within the existing urban area as well as in specified urban area expansions that are detailed in the Land Use Plan. These housing options will include a range of housing styles and types at densities of 2 to 25 units per acre. Where feasible, affordable housing units will be incorporated within High Density Residential in the Land Use Plan. These designated areas are depicted in the Land Use Plan chapter of this Plan. Development Density and Housing Goals Minnesota Statutes 473.859 Subd. 2(c) states that the content of the land use plan element of comprehensive plans shall “include a housing element containing standards, plans and programs for providing adequate housing opportunities to meet existing and projected local and regional housing needs, including but not limited to the use of official controls and land use planning to promote the availability of land for the development of low and moderate income housing.” CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 7 2021-2030 Housing allocation. For the period 2021-2030, Met Council established an allocation of 154 affordable units for the City of Orono. See also Table 3C-7. SUMMARY OF EXISTING HOUSING CONDITIONS The following sections provide a brief summary of the housing types, occupancy tenure, structural condition and price range of housing in Orono. Housing Types The predominant housing type in Orono is single-family detached dwellings. This is true of both the urban and the rural areas of the City. However, the number of multi-family housing units has increased substantially since 2000, primarily along the Highway 12 corridor with the addition of the Orono Woods Senior Housing building and the Stonebay development. Table 3C-2 Dwelling Units by Type (2005-2016) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Single Family (One unit detached) 2942 2953 2954 2944 2960 2952 2962 2944 2956 3019 2988 3006 Townhome 88 94 101 102 108 74 98 74 74 74 80 96 Duplex, Tri, Quad 19 19 19 19 19 30 60 30 30 30 30 30 Apartment (5 or more units) 62 110 119 119 119 153 76 206 215 215 215 215 Mobile Home/Trailer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 13 0 0 0 Total Dwelling Units 3111 3176 3193 3184 3206 3209 3209 3267 3288 3338 3313 3348 Source: US census A review of the Owner/ Rental statistics shows that the number of rental housing units is rising quickly, from 5 percent in 2000 to over 15 percent in 2015. CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 8 Table 3C-3: Owner/Renter Statistics (2000-2015) 2000 2015 Occupancy Type Number of Units % of All Units Number of Units % of All Units Owner-occupied 2,604 89.60% 2,808 84.76% Renter-occupied 162 5.60% 505 15.24% Total Occupied Units 2,766 3,313 Source: 2010 census, Metropolitan Council Age of Existing Housing Stock The range in ages of Orono's existing housing stock by defining the decade of construction is indicated in Table 3C-4. Approximately 56% of the housing stock is more than 50 years old, which raises concern about its continued functionality if maintenance is deferred. The numbers in Table 3C-4 do not necessarily reflect the extensive remodeling and upgrading that many Orono residences, especially lakeshore homes, have undergone in the last three decades. Table 3C-4: Age of Existing Housing Stock (2000 and 2016) Year Built 2000 % 2017 % unknown 150 5% 345 10% Pre-1940 693 24% 663 20% 1940-49 172 6% 150 4% 1950-59 343 12% 426 13% 1960-69 298 10% 304 9% 1970-79 415 15% 366 11% 1980-89 412 14% 447 13% 1990-00 359 13% 367 11% 2000-09 420 13% 2010-17 203 6% Total 2,845 100% 3,346 100% Source: 2000 U.S. Census; Hennepin County Records CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 9 Housing Demolitions Table 3C-5 reports the demolition of residential principal structures over the last 7 years. An average of 20 homes are removed per year. With land values continuously increasing and a substantial supply of older lakeshore homes still remaining in Orono, this trend is expected to continue. The City will monitor this trend to guard against the erosion of neighborhood character. Table 3C-5: Housing Demolitions Year # of Principal Structure Demolitions 2010 10 2011 15 2012 13 2013 25 2014 20 2015 27 2016 19 2017 33 Source: City Permitting records Cost Valuation of Housing in Orono Owner-occupied Housing The valuation of housing units in Orono is strongly tied to the location in relation to the lakeshore, though to some extent the age of the housing impacts the value. Much of the housing in Orono has been constructed as 'custom' housing rather than tract housing. Hennepin County Records were used to create the following table of housing values in Orono in 2015, illustrated as a percentage of total housing. Of note, almost 75% of all owner occupied housing is valued at $300,000 or more. Figure 3C-2 graphically illustrates the location of owner occupied housing and indicates value of the home. Table 3C-6: Valuation of Owner-occupied Units 2015 Valuation 2015 $75,000 to $99,999 0.43% $100,000 to $124,999 0.93% $125,000 to $149,999 2.76% $150,000 to $174,999 3.39% $175,000 to $199,999 3.23% $200,000 to $249,999 8.10% $250,000 to $299,999 7.52% $300,000 to $399,999 10.51% $400,000 to $499,999 9.93% $500,000 or more 53.15% Source: Hennepin County CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 10 Figure 3C-2: Owner Occupied Housing by Estimated Market Value CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 11 Affordable housing Table 3C-7 shows the current (2016) number of households with incomes 80% of the AMI, or less. These 639 households represent 21% of the total households in Orono. We consider this the supply of housing units that are affordable. Table 3C-7: Affordable Housing Currently (2016) Projected need 2021- 2030 Income at or below 30% of AMI 78 69 Income 31-50% of AMI 76 56 Income 51-80% of AMI 485 29 Totals 639 154 Source: Metropolitan Council Table 3C-7 also illustrates Orono’s share of additional affordable homes for the 2021-2030 decade. Orono intends to provide opportunity for these units in the form of 15.4 acres of development at densities higher than 10 units per acre. Table 3B-4 predicts all developable properties within the sewered area. 63.4 acres are identified for development at densities greater than 10 units per acre. Table 3C-8 shows the number of costs burdened households, households whose housing costs are at least 30% of their income. We consider this the demand of affordable housing. The demand of affordable housing, at 30% or less of the AMI is almost double the supply. Based on these calculations and estimates, the greatest need of housing is for incomes at or below 30% of the AMI. Table 3C-8 : Cost Burdened Households At or Below 30% AMI 148 Between 31% and 50% AMI 64 Between 51% and 80% AMI 104 Total Units 316 Subsidized Housing Units At the present time, the City of Orono does not contain any units of subsidized housing. This is due in part to the lack of or limited shopping and employment opportunities, public transportation, and medical facilities. HOUSING NEEDS IDENTIFICATION In assessing local housing needs, Orono has identified the need for a broader range of housing choices including starter homes, empty-nester, and senior housing, and an ongoing need for substantial housing rehabilitation. Our aging population is retiring and on fixed incomes. Orono has identified one of our greatest needs as housing rehabilitation for senior-citizen homeowners and for alternative senior housing accommodations in the immediate lake area. A second pressing need is for a wider range of housing options for middle CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 12 income residents, such as those who grew up in Orono and would like to raise a family here, but cannot find suitably priced homes. A third identified need is for the empty nesters or professionals whose lifestyle better matches the amenities of attached unit housing. The Land Use Plan (Chapter 3B, and Maps 3B-3a) identifies development opportunities in a variety of densities to meet the diverse housing demands of the City of Orono. In 1995 the Minnesota legislature enacted the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act, which established funding for metro-area cities to invest in local economic revitalization and affordable housing initiatives. The Metropolitan Council is responsible for implementing the Metropolitan Livable Communities Program, and negotiating with individual municipalities to establish affordable and life-cycle housing goals consistent with the Metropolitan Development Guide HOUSING IMPEMENTATION PLAN Orono's Housing Implementation Plan is based upon the following Goals and Policies which are designed to be consistent with our regional housing responsibilities and with the Goals, Policies and Plans of the other elements of the Community Management Plan. SCOPE The time framework of the housing improvement plan is intended to address the requirements of the Metropolitan Council for the planning period of 2020 through 2040 and retain Orono’s own housing character. The goals, policies and proposed housing programs contained in this Chapter are set in the context of the legislative mandate to plan for regional needs through the year 2040. In addition, the housing programs also reflect Orono's plans for permanent maintenance of the low density rural residential community. Housing Goals 1. To provide housing types and residential densities consistent with environmental and land use plans and with the availability of public services and facilities. 2. To provide opportunities for a mix of housing types, locations, and cost ranges which will meet the needs and provide adequate housing for a broader range of ages, family groups, lifestyle needs and levels of income to the greatest extent practical. 3. To improve the housing conditions of persons residing in substandard housing. 4. To provide safe, healthful, and blight-free residences and neighborhoods. 5. To provide immediately beneficial housing programs for the greatest number of Orono residents with affordable housing needs. Urban Housing Policies 1. The residential areas of urban Orono are primarily suitable for single family development. Because of historic development patterns, most of Orono's urbanized CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 13 neighborhoods are located along the Lake Minnetonka shoreline, or within 1,000 feet of the shoreline. These lands are environmentally sensitive to overuse or over development such as typically occurs with large scale developments. Urban residential development in a limited number of areas further from the shoreline at a density of 2-25 units per acre is compatible with Orono's environmental policies of limited hardcover and maximum retention of natural open space and vegetation to protect Lake Minnetonka. 2. A wider range of housing types will be provided by planned residential developments. A limited amount of land is available within the Urban Service Area for planned developments of townhomes, garden type apartments or mixed residential and limited commercial land uses. These housing clusters or multiple family developments will be acceptable only where full urban services are available and only where the proposed density is compatible with the neighborhood and with local environmental constraints. Multiple family developments generally will not be considered appropriate for lands within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Additionally, County Road 15 is the key roadway serving Orono’s urban areas and particularly the Navarre area. It is not practical from an economic or environmental standpoint to expand County Road 15 to increase its capacity. Therefore, additional housing options will be primarily developed along Orono’s Highway 12 corridor in specifically identified areas that are or will be served by urban services. The City will consider proposals for developments that will provide housing types in furtherance of Orono’s housing goals as established in this Housing Plan. 3. Urban density residential development must occur within the defined Urban Area. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan. The Urban Area as defined in this Plan will not be greatly expanded into the defined rural area, and urban services and facilities will not be extended into the rural area for purposes of fostering or allowing increased development in those areas. 4. Urban density residential development will utilize existing or planned public services and facilities. New residential development will be allowed to infill existing vacant properties within the Urban Area consistent with environmental limitations and with the existing or planned capacities of water, sewer, drainage, transportation and recreational facilities. New development will not be permitted to overburden these services at the expense of the existing users. New urban development will not be permitted if it requires additional unplanned local or regional facilities capacity. 5. The City will promote scattered site development as opposed to large scale tract development within the existing developed urban area. 6. The City will promote rehabilitation of existing older or substandard homes. Whereas there is no identifiable block of deteriorated housing in the City, there are a substantial number of older homes or converted cottages that are in need of repair, energy conservation measures, or major rehabilitation. In many cases, these homes are occupied by low income or fixed CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 14 income persons who cannot undertake the needed work within their means. Maintaining existing neighborhoods and existing homes enables maintenance of affordability. Replacement of these homes, even with higher density development, would result in substantially increased housing prices. The City will promote private and subsidized public rehabilitation efforts to improve the existing housing stock, to improve and maintain the neighborhoods, and most importantly to improve the living conditions of the affected citizens. 7. The City will promote development or rehabilitation that is compatible with the existing neighborhood. The City will encourage all homeowners and developers to be conscious of the neighborhood, the site and the environment in the design and improvement of residential properties. The City will encourage, and in many cases, require the retention of woods and vegetation, open spaces, light, air and scenic views. No new development will be permitted to conflict with or to adversely affect the established neighborhood character. Rural Housing Policies 1. Housing in rural Orono will be limited to single family homes at established rural densities. The majority of the rural area has been zoned to require a minimum of 2 acres of dry buildable land per residential lot, with an area in the northwest corner of the City requiring at least 5 dry buildable acres. 2. The City will promote rehabilitation of existing older or substandard rural homes. Rural Orono contains a significant number of older homes, which also require repair, energy conservation measures or major rehabilitation. These rural owners also require the same type of assistance often reserved for urban areas. Therefore, the City will promote private and subsidized public rehabilitation efforts in both urban and rural housing improvements programs. HOUSING ACTION PLAN Orono's Housing Action Plan is a set of implementation policies designed to achieve the above stated Housing Goals and Planning Policies. A top priority in Orono must be improving the housing conditions of persons who are presently inadequately housed and eliminating substandard housing. There are deteriorated and dilapidated housing units located throughout the City. Orono's Housing Action Plan is aimed principally at improving the condition of Orono's older homes, both urban and rural, and improving the housing conditions of Orono's many low, moderate and fixed income residents. 1. Orono will cooperate with neighboring cities to fulfill area-wide housing needs. Most apparent is the need of many senior Orono residents who desire to live in the immediate area, but who cannot find available senior housing. Orono will actively participate with nearby municipalities to facilitate the provision of senior housing at locations that are near to home yet also convenient to necessary shopping, transportation and medical facilities. 2. Orono will continue to participate in housing rehabilitation subsidy programs. Many Orono residents, both urban and rural, are occupying older housing that has code-related structural, safety or CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 15 health hazards, substandard living conditions or energy inefficiencies. They would like to improve their housing condition and their neighborhood's appearance, but are unable to because of insufficient income. Orono will continue to actively participate in Community Development Block Grant and Minnesota Housing Finance Assistance programs designed to help these citizens meet their very immediate housing needs. 3. Orono will encourage developers to provide a variety of housing types and cost ranges. Whenever a multiple family or clustered housing development is proposed, Orono will actively encourage setting aside a reasonable number of units for large families and/or for low and moderate income families. Orono will participate and assist developers in applications for loan guarantees or other suitable forms of housing subsidy aids which may be available. Orono will also consider proposals for lifecycle housing options for sites which have not been guided for such use, but where such use may be appropriate if developed in a manner that is sensitive to the surrounding land uses and has the necessary services available. Such areas may include property that is currently guided or zoned for more intense uses such as commercial or industrial, or may include sites adjacent to existing higher intensity uses. 4. Housing construction will be subject to uniform state building code requirements but will not be burdened with unnecessary zoning requirements. Orono does not intend to require arbitrary minimum dwelling sizes or minimum amenity installations as these artificial standards only drive up the cost of housing while limiting the buyer's freedom of choice. 5. Orono will promote energy conservation methods and procedures. Orono will actively pursue and advertise all available programs for energy conservation funding. 6. To achieve its housing goals outlined above, the City will evaluate opportunities to utilize public and non-profit programs or to partner with other agencies in these programs. There is a wide variety of tools and programs available to cities and property owners, developed to encourage affordable housing, and include the following. Property owners and developers should be advised that while available to the city, Orono has historically applied the use of Orono tax dollars very conservatively, only for projects that strongly met City housing, land use, environmental, and quality of life goals.  Orono Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The City Established an HRA in 1991. The City has used its HRA to assist in the development of Senior housing complex and may do so in the future.  Housing Bonds: Minnesota State Statute allows HRAs to issue housing bonds to provide affordable housing via the acquisition of an existing buildings, development of elderly or disability housing, or the acquisition of accumulated equity for low income preservation.  Tax Abatement: Cities may issue bonds to be used to support the construction of affordable housing, using a portion of the property tax received (tax abatement) from the development to finance these bonds. This removes this property from paying taxes for the services needed for this property, its residents and the community in general. The City may develop a tax abatement policy to determine if and when the level of affordable housing and the guaranteed length of affordability provide sufficient public benefit to justify the use of tax abatement.  Tax Increment Financing: Cities may create a housing district to create a tax increment financing (TIF) district. The TIF bonds issued on this district are to be used to support the construction of affordable housing, and property taxes received above the original tax value (increment) from the CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 16 development are utilized to finance these bonds. The property tax revenue that otherwise would be available to pay for city services would be restricted and not available to pay for the services. The City may develop a TIF policy to determine if and when the level of affordable housing and the guaranteed length of affordability to provide a public benefit is great enough to justify the use of tax increment financing.  Minnesota Housing Consolidated Request for Proposals: The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency provides a request for proposal (RFP) once annually where affordable housing developers can apply for funding to construct affordable housing. The City may consider supporting applications for new housing that addresses the City’s need allocation of 267 units below 50% AMI based upon how well the proposed projects meet City objectives.  Community Development Block Grants (CDBG): The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides CDBG funds to communities with over 45,000 residents for the use of providing and maintaining affordable housing. Hennepin County HRA administers these CDBG funds for the City of Orono. The City will consider applications that addresses the City’s need allocation of 267 units below 50% AMI based upon how well the proposed projects meet City objectives.  Energy Assistance: Xcel energy and Wright-Hennepin offer programs intended to encourage energy efficiency and responsible use of energy resources. Xcel energy promotes a bill payment assistance program. These programs and rebates rapidly change and the resident is encouraged to check with their energy provided periodically.  Livable Communities Grants: Administered by the Metropolitan Council, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) funds innovative (re)development projects that efficiently link housing, jobs, services and transit in an effort to create inspiring and lasting Livable Communities. Grants are available to fund basic public infrastructure and site assembly.  Fee Waivers or Adjustments: State rules require that city fees correlate to the cost of providing the services. The city will closely monitor expenses as they relate to project review to ensure fees closely match expenses.  Zoning and Subdivision Policies: The City frequently grants variances and adjusts its zoning and subdivision regulations through a planned unit development (PUD). The City currently provides zoning incentives such as increased density and potential staging plan flexibility for projects which achieve the city’s housing goals.  4(d) Tax Program: The 4(d) tax program provides a 40% tax credit to property owners of affordable housing, to be leveraged with local government financial assistance.  Land Trusts: A land trust achieves affordable home ownership by owning the land on which a house is located, allowing the resident to seek financing only on the house. The resident enters into a long-term lease for the home. The advantage of a land trust is that the largest contributor to housing prices in Orono is the land, and the land trust removes that cost from the purchasing equation. The trust can control the future sale of the property to ensure that affordability can be maintained and have the ability to scatter the land trust sites throughout the community. The disadvantage of a land trust is that it will take significant financial resources to purchase the land rights and those resources are never recovered during the period that the property remains affordable. Orono may evaluate if joining the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust is the most efficient way to use its resources to provide affordable housing. 7. Update Housing study. Recognizing multiplication of households that rent, the City may consider an update of a housing study, last completed in the Navarre area in 1997-1998, to better understand this trend. Further, the city will work to educate renters and owners on Fair Housing practices. CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4A TRANSPORTATION PLAN Introduction 4A-2 Purpose and Scope 4A-2 Roadways 4A-3 Table 4A-1 Roadways Classification Summary 4A-4 Table 4A-2 A Minor Arterials 4A-5 Table 4A-3 Collectors 4A-6 Table 4A-4 MSA Roads 4A-7 Table 4A-5 Road Design Capacity 4A-8 Table 4A-6 Road Capacity 4A-9 Fig. 4A-2 Ring Road Concept 4A-10 Table 4A-7 Future Capacity 4A-11 Fig 3 Access Curve 4A-11 Fig. 4 Maintenance/ Cost Curve 4A-12 Table 4A-8 Maintenance 4A-13 Trails 4A-14 Lake Access 4A-16 Table 4A-9 Lake Access Points 4A-17 Transit 4A-20 Freight 4A-20 Aviation 4A-21 Implementation Plan. 4A-21 Table 4A-10 Goals and Objectives 4A-22 Table 4A-11 Transportation History 4A-25 Appendices 4A-A. TAZ Zones Map 4A-1 Functional Classification Map 4A-2 Jurisdiction Classifications Map 4A-3 Traffic Analysis zones Map 4A-4 Traffic and Crash Information Map 4A-5 Forecasted Traffic Information Map 4A-6 Non-motorized facilities and Points of Interest Map 4A-7 Existing and Planned Transit Infrastructure Map 4A-8 Freight, Rail, and Heavy Commercial Corridors CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 2 CMP PART 4A TRANSPORTATION PLAN INTRODUCTION The City of Orono’s transportation system generally operates well today. The City’s multimodal transportation system includes facilities for personal vehicles, freight, walking, and bicycling. Facilities are operated by a number of agencies, including the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Three Rivers Park District, MnDOT, and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad. This transportation chapter has been prepared in compliance with state statues and applicable Metropolitan Council guidelines. As part of this plan, the City has reviewed existing and future conditions for each mode and identified safety, operations, and network improvements that will be important to address before 2040. The City has also developed goals, objectives, and strategies to preserve and improve the transportation system. PURPOSE AND SCOPE Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) This plan has been prepared to be consistent with the regional transportation strategies outlined in the Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP). The TPP is a regional plan that evaluates the existing transportation system, identifies transportation challenges to the region, and sets regional goals, objectives, and priorities to meet the transportation needs of current residents while accommodating the region’s anticipated growth. The TPP also guides local agencies in coordinating land use and transportation and established regional performance measures and targets. The TPP is guided by the following goals:  Transportation system stewardship: Sustainable investments in the transportation system are protected by strategically preserving, maintaining, and operating system assets.  Safety and Security: The regional transportation system is safe and secure for all users.  Access to Destinations: People and businesses prosper by using a reliable, affordable, and efficient multimodal transportation system that connects them to destinations throughout the region and beyond.  Competitive Economy: The regional transportation system supports the economic competitiveness, vitality, and prosperity of the region and State.  Healthy Environment: The regional transportation system contributes to communities’ livability and sustainability while protecting the natural, cultural, and developed environments.  Leveraging Transportation Investment to Guide Land Use: The region leverages transportation investments to guide land use and development patterns that advance the regional vision of stewardship, prosperity, livability, equity, and sustainability. CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 3  Lake Access, Preservation, and Management. Access to the Lake recognizes the value of the lake and reinforces the desire to protect its value to the community and the region. Funding is a key constraint that is acknowledged in the TPP. Current transportation revenue will not meet the region’s transportation needs through 2040. As a result, the TPP includes two long- term investment scenarios: a fiscally-constrained scenario under current revenue, and an increased revenue scenario that identifies priorities should additional transportation funding become available. Under the current fiscally constrained revenue scenario, the TPP is focused on operations and maintenance of the existing transportation system. Investments in highway mobility and access are limited to those that address multiple TPP goals and objectives. The increased revenue scenario would allow additional investments in operations and maintenance, as well as regional mobility, access, safety, and bicycle/pedestrian improvements. However, congestion cannot be greatly reduced under even the increased revenue scenario. Under both scenarios, proposed investments are focused on areas of the metro with the greatest existing and future challenges and anticipated growth. Orono’s Place within the TPP Orono is classified by the Metropolitan Council under the Emerging Suburban Edge and Rural Residential community designations. The TPP does not include any planned regional investments in Orono. Density Allocation With two communities in one, rural and urban, Orono finds that higher density development sites are most appropriate adjacent to high volume transportation corridors, within MUSA, and near commercial services (employment, shopping, etc.) While historically located primarily in the Navarre area, additional appropriate sites were identified in the north Orono area, due in part to capacity and safety constraints of the County Road 15 and 19 intersection in Navarre. ROADWAYS The sections below provide information about the existing and future roadway system within Orono; including functional classification, jurisdictions, capacity, safety, access management, and maintenance. Functional Classification System The Functional Classification System organizes a roadway and street network that distributes traffic from local neighborhood streets to collector roadways, then to minor arterials and ultimately the principal arterial system. Roads are placed into categories based on the degree to which they provide access to adjacent land and mobility for through traffic. Functional classification gives an indication of the relative hierarchy of roadways in the transportation network. Four classes of roadways are included in the Seven-County Metropolitan Area functional classification CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 4 system: principal arterials, minor arterials, collector streets, and local streets. Map 4A-1shows the existing functional classification of each road in the City of Orono and Map 4A-2 shows existing roadway jurisdiction. The following sections describe each functional class in greater detail and indicate which roadways fall into each classification. Table 4A-1 Roadway Classification Summary Table Criteria Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Local Street Place Connections Interconnects metro centers and regional business concentrations Interconnects major trip generators Interconnects neighborhoods and minor business concentrations Interconnects blocks within neighborhoods and land parcels within Intersections Grade separated or high-capacity intersection controls Traffic signals, roundabouts and cross-street stops All-way stops, roundabouts and some traffic signals As required for safe operation Parking None Restricted as necessary Restricted as necessary Usually unrestricted Mobility Highest High Moderate Low Access No direct property access Limited access to property Access to properties is common Unrestricted property access Typical Average Daily Traffic 15,000-200,000 5,000-30,000 1,000-15,000 Less than 1,000 Posted Speed Limits 45-65 mph 35-45 mph 30-40 mph Maximum 30 mph Right-of-way Width 100-300 feet 60-150 feet 60-100 feet 50-80 feet Transit Accommodations Priority access for transit in peak periods Preferential treatment where needed Designed for use by regular route buses Normally used as bus routes only in non- residential areas Principal Arterials Principal arterials are roadways that provide the greatest level of mobility and access control. Within the metropolitan area, the great majority of principal arterials are under MnDOT jurisdiction. Principal arterials are typically Interstate highways or other state or US freeways or expressways. Principal arterials also connect to other cities, regions, and states outside of the metropolitan area. Principal arterials are intended to maintain average speeds of 40 mph during peak traffic periods. To maintain mobility and speeds on principal arterials, land access and transportation system connections are limited. There is little to no direct land access from principal arterials. Access is limited to interstate freeways, other Principal Arterials, and A Minor Arterials. Access points are typically grade-separated or controlled with a signal and are spaced approximately one to two miles apart. Within the City of Orono, there is one principal arterial: US Highway 12. The TPP does not identify CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 5 any specific regional mobility improvements on this highway, including expansion of any lanes, although maintenance and preservation investments will be made on all highways. Highway 12 is currently 2 lanes, in the “Super Two” Concept. The lanes are separated by a concrete barrier to address safety concerns raised in the last 10 years. Minor Arterials The minor arterial system supplements the principal arterial system and provides connections to the principal arterial system. Minor arterials also support access to major traffic generators, including regional job concentrations and freight terminals, and between rural centers within and just outside the region. Access points along minor arterials are generally at-grade and typically controlled with signals or stop signs. The Metropolitan Council has established a system of “A” Minor and Other Minor arterials. “A” Minor arterials are eligible for federal funding administered by the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council has further split “A” Minor arterials into four types, described below. The City has three (3) miles of minor arterial roads. Table 4A-2: A Minor Arterials A Minor Arterials Other Relievers Augmenters Expanders Connectors Purpose Provide supplementary capacity for congested, parallel principal arterial Supplement the principal arterial system in more densely developed or redeveloping areas Supplement the principal arterial system in less densely developed or redeveloping areas Provide safe, direct connections between rural centers and to principal arterials in rural areas without adding continuous general purpose lane capacity These roadways connect major traffic generators in the region. Other arterials are not eligible for federal funding Hennepin County System CSAH 112 (3 Lanes) CSAH 6 (2 Lanes) CSAH 15 (2 Lanes) CSAH 19 (S of 15, 2 Lanes) CSAH 6 (West of McCulley Rd, 2 Lanes) CSAH 19 (N of CSAH 15; 2 Lanes) Orono System McCulley Road (2 Lanes) Collector Streets Collector streets provide linkages to larger developments and community amenities. They generally do not link communities to one another. Collector streets generally favor access to the system over mobility, but try to balance the two competing needs. These roadways are generally lower speed than the principal or minor arterial routes. They are usually owned and operated by cities, although counties operate some of these facilities. Orono has 20 miles of Collector Streets. CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 6 Table 4A-3: Collectors Major Collector Minor Collector Purpose Major collectors serve higher density residential areas (often penetrating residential neighborhoods for significant distances), job and activity centers and freight terminals that are not on the arterial system, and they serve longer local trips, including local bus service. Minor collectors serve shorter local trips and lower density land uses (often penetrating residential neighborhoods only for a short distance). Existing Other Jurisdictions CSAH 84 (Bayside/Leaf Fox St/Old Crystal Bay Rd) CSAH 51 North Shore Dr) CSAH 146 (Brown Road S) CR 201 (Homestead Tr) CSAH 135 (Tonkawa Rd) CSAH 151 (West Branch North Arm Dr) Existing Orono System Brown Road N Old Crystal Bay Road (N of Fox) Watertown Road Willow Drive (S of CSAH 112, north of Fox) Fox Street (Willow to Brown) Ferndale Road W) Stubbs Bay Rd (Bayside to Watertown) Ferndale Rd N Kelley Pky Leaf Street Casco Point Road Dunwoody Ave Ferndale Rd W Hunter Dr North Arm Dr Orono Orchard Rd Tamarack Dr Wildhurst Trail Fox Street (W of Willow and E of Brown) Local Streets Local streets connect blocks and land parcels, and the primary emphasis is on land access. In most cases, local streets connect to other local streets and collectors. In some cases, they connect to minor arterials. Local streets serve short trips at low speeds. Local streets are under the jurisdiction of the City of Orono. Orono currently has 27 miles of publicly owned local streets. Orono’s history has had a significant impact on the local road way systems. Northern Rural Orono Roads The straight-line road grid system in central and northern Orono was established along section lines a century ago to efficiently serve the agricultural activity in the City. This grid has readily adapted to use as a collector system for the many local and private roads created to serve new rural residential subdivisions in the last 40-50 years. Southern Lakeshore Roads The seasonal recreational uses that grew up along Orono’s 40 miles of Lake Minnetonka shoreline a CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 7 century ago resulted in a network of winding roads that commonly followed the center of the narrow peninsulas between bays, creating local road frontage for lakeshore lots while also often serving as the main road between settlements. A large number of these roads do not meet current specifications as they are narrow, winding roads with steep slopes. Private Roads A private road is a privately owned and privately maintained road, located in the rural area or within a planned development that functions as a local access street. In order to curb maintenance expenses the city has, since the 1980s, maintained a policy that developments in Orono’s rural area would be serviced by privately maintained roads. The city does require that the private roads are built to city standards and that the city is granted an underlying easement to ensure right of access. As a result Orono currently has 20 miles of privately owned and maintained roads. All urban properties should be directly served by the public street system. Rural properties should be served by private streets unless through streets. State Aid Roads To support the state's system of streets, roads and bridges, MnDOT distributes funds for highway maintenance and construction to counties, cities and townships based on a formula determined by the Legislature. The roads that are on the state aid system typically carry heavier traffic volumes, connect major points of interest, and provide an integrated and coordinated road system. The majority of the county Roads within Orono are designated County State Aid Highways (CSAH). The City has 9.45 miles of roadway eligible for Municipal State Aid (MSA). Planned Functional Classification Changes There are no planned changes to functional classifications of roads within Orono. However, four jurisdictional transfers are under consideration based on existing functional classification and traffic patterns. McCulley Road to Hennepin County to tie CSAH 19 to CSAH 6. Bayside Road (CSAH 84) From Hennepin County to Orono. Tonkawa Road (CSAH 135) from Hennepin County to Orono. West Branch / North Shore (CSAH 151) from Hennepin County to Orono. Table 4A-4: MSA Roads Name Description State Aid # Willow Dr County Rd 6 to Fox St MSAS 101 Old Crystal Bay Rd County Rd 6 to Fox St MSAS 102 Watertown Rd Willow Dr to County Road 6 MSAS 103 McCulley Rd Entirety MSAS 104 Fox St Old Crystal Bay Rd to Brown Rd MSAS 105 Brown Rd N County Road 6 to Wayzata Blvd MSAS 107 Leaf St Watertown Rd to Bayside Rd MSAS 109 Ferndale Rd County road 6 to City Boundary MSAS 110 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 8 Roadway Capacity A roadway’s capacity indicates how many vehicles may use a roadway before it experiences congestion. Capacity is largely dependent upon the number of lanes. Table 4A-5 lists planning- level thresholds that indicate a roadway’s capacity. Additional variation (more or less capacity) on an individual segment is influenced by a number of factors including: amount of access, type of access, peak hour percent of traffic, directional split of traffic, truck percent, opportunities to pass, and amount of turning traffic, the availability of dedicated turn lanes, parking availability, intersection spacing, signal timing and a variety of other factors. Roadway Capacity – Traffic Forecasting The Metropolitan Council uses Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs) for traffic forecasting. Each forecast study area, in this case the City of Orono, is divided into a series of TAZs (see Map 4A-3). The TAZ data for Orono can be found at Appendix 4A-A. The modeling shows the majority to the projected growth in the city within the TAZs that correspond with City Municipal Utility Service Areas (MUSA) which further corresponds to the cities areas for higher existing and planned densities. Current and Future Regional / Hennepin County Capacity At the planning level, capacity problems are identified by comparing the existing number of lanes with current traffic volumes. The table below illustrates the existing number of lanes on state and county arterial roadways within the City. To identify the need for potential future capacity improvements, Hennepin County compared 2030 forecasts to planning-level roadway capacities. Nearly all State and County roadways within the City have adequate capacity to handle forecast 2040 traffic volumes with little to minimal congestion. (See Map 4A-4). Based on traffic counts in 2015 the only Hennepin County road currently undersized based on capacity is Shoreline Drive (CSAH 15). The 2015 ADT for CSAH 15 was 17,600. Those roads projected to exceed their design capacity by 2030 are highlighted red below. Table 4A-5 Design Capacity Roadway Type Daily Capacity Planning Level (ADT) Two-lane undivided urban 10,000 Two-lane undivided rural 15,000 Three-lane urban (two-lane divided with turn lanes) 17,000 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 9 County Road 15 is the primary minor arterial for commuter traffic through southern Orono. Because County Road 15 abuts the shoreline along much of its route, the City is committed to retaining its character as that of a scenic parkway serving local residences. Such a character is incompatible with its minor arterial function. It would therefore be preferable to reduce the volume of traffic on County Road 15 by providing an additional east-west corridor in southern Orono. However, the configuration of Lake Minnetonka’s bays and the severe topography between them, as well as the large number of wetlands in the shoreland Table 4A-6: Road Capacity Road Name Type # of Lanes State Aid Route # Current ADT 2040 ADT Estimated * Highway 12 Principal Arterial Two Lane-divided NA 23,100 UKN Wayzata Blvd Minor Arterial Three-lane-urban CSAH 112 11,000 15,900 County Road 6 Minor Arterial Two-lane, undivided-rural CSAH 6 11,000 8000 Watertown Road (CR6) Minor Arterial Two-lane, undivided-rural CSAH 6 10,000 14200 Shoreline Drive Minor Arterial Two-lane, undivided-rural CSAH 15 17,600 22,000 Shadywood Drive(N of 15) Minor Arterial Two-lane, undivided-rural CSAH 19 5,700 7400 Shadywood Drive (S of 15) Minor Arterial Two-lane, undivided-rural CSAH 19 11,900 13100 Northshore Drive Collector Two-lane, undivided-rural CSAH 51 4650 5700 Brown Road S Collector Two-lane, undivided-rural CSAH 146 1450 2200 West Branch Collector Two-lane, undivided-rural CSAH 151 1750 2300 Bayside, Leaf, Fox Streets Collector Two-lane, undivided-rural CSAH 84 690 1100 Old Crystal Bay Road S Collector Two-lane, undivided-rural CSAH 84 1800 2600 Tonkawa Road Collector Two-lane, undivided-rural CSAH 135 560 800 Homestead Trail (CR 201) Collector Two-lane, undivided-rural ----- 1050 1400 * Data from Hennepin county’s 2040 ADT Forecast prepared in 2018 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 10 areas, preclude the development of such a corridor. To address this issue, the Ring Route was established in 1980 by connecting County Road 19 to County Road 6 via McCulley Road, providing a relatively direct route northeastward to Highway 12 from the western Lake Minnetonka area. The City will encourage the use of this ring route to address traffic congestion through the Navarre Area. Congestion policies The City will continue to work with the County and other transportation agencies to facilitate improvements to the transportation networks. This assistance may include right of way or easement procurement, staging of Orono projects, and information outreach. Orono Roadway Current and Future Capacity Collector and minor arterial roads under the City’s jurisdiction are all two-lane roadways, are currently, and are projected to remain under their maximum capacity guidelines of 15,000 Average Daily Traffic (ADT). Forecasted 2040 traffic volumes are shown on Map- 4A-5. Right of Way Expansion The City has not identified any critical right of way acquisition needs. Figure 4A-2 Ring Road Concept CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 11 Table 4A-7: Future Capacity Road Name Type # of Lanes State Aid Route # 2015 ADT 2040 ADT Estimated* Fox St Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - Rural MSAS 105 1025 1639 Old Crystal Bay Rd Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - Rural MSAS 102 1948 3116 Willow Dr Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - Rural MSAS 101 4319 6908 Old Crystal Bay Rd Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - Rural MSAS 102 4708 7530 Watertown Rd Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - Rural MSAS 103 4428 7083 McCulley RD Minor Arterial 2 Lane, Undivided - Rural MSAS 104 5633 9010 * the 2040 ADT estimate is based on the 2015 ADT x the Increase in the # of households which is 60% Roadway Safety Providing a safe transportation system for all users is a high priority for the city. This needs to be accomplished through a combination of engineering, education, and enforcement and is to be targeted towards all users including drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The City continues to proactively work with the county and other regional local and state partners to incorporate safety into all transportation designs and efforts. In order to address safety issues on city streets the City adopted a Traffic Management Policy in 2014. The policy is intended to provide a systematic process for the City to address traffic concerns by a consistently applying City Code and other applicable laws and regulations while incorporating a wide variety of traffic management and safety techniques. Access Management The purpose of access management is to provide adequate access to adjacent land development while maintaining acceptable traffic flow on higher level roadways. Management consists of carefully controlling the spacing and design of public street intersections and private access points to the public roadway system. Arterials, being designed for higher speed, longer distance trips, generally have reduced or restricted access, while local streets can accommodate much greater access. Collector roadways fall in between arterials and local roadways regarding the amount of access that is permitted. The agency with jurisdiction over a roadway sets access management guidelines. Figure 4A-3: Access Curve CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 12 Regional / County Road Access Access to US 12 must meet MnDOT access management guidelines. Hennepin County has established access management guidelines for county roads. Hennepin County requires permits for new driveway access to county roads and when land uses change at a site adjacent to a county road. In addition, the county reviews development plats for access management compliance. Hennepin County typically requires that new access points meet its guidelines; however, the county can make exceptions to the guidelines with sufficient justification. (See Hennepin County Transportation Plan for detailed county access requirements and guidelines). Orono Access Management Management of access to principal and minor arterials is necessary to ensure a safe and efficient arterial system. Direct individual property access to arterials is regulated in the Orono Municipal Code by requiring development of local or private roads to serve new residential developments of 3 or more units; by limiting the number of curb cuts per residence; by prohibiting direct access to principal arterials; and by a number of other regulations involving the location, type and number of access points to the arterial roadway system. However, many of southern Orono’s arterials near the Lake Minnetonka shoreline have historically served a dual function as both arterials and as local/collector streets, due to geographic and topographic limitations. It should be noted that there are existing access points that do not meet City, County, and MnDOT access spacing guidelines. In most cases these access points were established prior to agency access spacing guidelines. In other cases the agency has granted an exception to the existing guidelines. As roadways are reconstructed, each of these agencies generally works to modify and/or relocate access points that do not meet current access spacing guidelines in the interest of long term safety and efficiency. Pavement Preservation / Maintenance. Pavement Preservation is a program employing a network level, long-term strategy to enhance pavement performance by using integrated, cost- effective set of practices that extend pavement life, improve safety and meet resident’s expectations. As the diagram to the right illustrates, as the pavement condition decreases, the cost for the appropriate method of repair can increase significantly. Maintenance activities applied to surfaces in better condition, such as sealcoats, thin or structural overlays may prove to be more cost effective than waiting until the pavement is in poor condition when it is necessary to perform more costly maintenance or reconstruction. Source: “The Hole Story,” American Public Works Association Figure 4A-4: Maintenance/ cost curve CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 13 An effective preservation programs addresses pavements while they are still in good condition. A cost-effective treatment in a timely manner will restore the pavement almost to its original condition. By doing so, the cumulative costs of such treatment are substantially less then reconstruction or major rehabilitation over the life of the pavement. In addition the disruption of traffic is less for more frequent and minimal treatments in comparison to larger construction treatments. A proper Pavement Preservation program consists of three primary components: Table 4A-8 Maintenance Type Description Examples Preventive maintenance A planned strategy of cost-effective treatments to an existing roadway system and its appurtenances that preserves the system, retards future deterioration, and maintains or improves the functional condition of the system (without significantly increasing the structural capacity). Chip sealing Slurry or micro surfacing Thin overlay Routine maintenance Day-to-day activities that are scheduled by maintenance personnel to maintain and preserve the pavement at a satisfactory level. Cleaning of ditches & structures Pavement markings maintenance Crack filling Pavement patching Minor rehabilitation Minor Structural enhancements that extend the service life of an existing pavement and/or improve its load carrying capacity. Overlays Mill and Overlay Geiger, D.R., Pavement Preservation Definitions, FHWA Memorandum dated 12 September 2005. County Road/ Pavement Maintenance Hennepin County implemented a pavement management system in 1996 to identify roadway maintenance priorities. The pavement management system tracks pavement condition to help decision making regarding the cost / benefit trade-offs of road reconstruction versus lower level maintenance strategies. The Program is used by the County to develop priorities for pavement maintenance projects on county roads. (See Hennepin county Transportation Plan for details on their Maintenance program) Orono Road/Pavement Maintenance The primary need for Orono Roadways in the coming years is maintenance. Over the last decade Orono had underfunded road maintenance and replacement operations and therefore the roads have fallen in to disrepair. Orono adopted a pavement management system in 2014 to identify roadway maintenance priorities. The pavement management system tracks pavement condition to help decision making regarding the cost / benefit trade-offs of road reconstruction versus lower level maintenance strategies. While a certain share of the City’s annual levy is dedicated to Pavement Management Fund (PMF) each year for maintenance, much of the city’s infrastructure is aging. This is particularly challenging in the older, more developed parts of the city. Many of these roads are old, were not initially designed to support the land use forms desired today, are not pedestrian or bicycle friendly, and are in need of both infrastructure and land use revitalization. Also a lack of adequate funding for preventive maintenance activities has resulted in a great deal of deferred maintenance. This deferred maintenance has undesirable consequences from a financial as well as a user perspective, and effective planning is needed to ensure that quality infrastructure is sustained over time. Streets that receive no preventive maintenance are often beyond repair in just ten years, while streets that are properly maintained at critical stages in the life-cycle can last up CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 14 to twenty-five years or more. Local roadway maintenance has the potential to become more of an issue in the future due to Orono’s reliance on privately maintained roads to serve the rural neighborhoods. Orono’s 20 miles of private rural area roadways are currently maintained by individual property owners or through neighborhood homeowners associations. Conversion of these private roadways to a public status with public maintenance would result in Orono’s road maintenance costs increasing substantially. Bridge Maintenance State and County Bridges The vast majority of bridges located within Orono fall under the jurisdiction of the state and county. Orono Bridges All three bridges under Orono roadway jurisdiction have been completely replaced within the past ten years. These include the bridges on West Ferndale Road, Fox Street, and McCulley Road. The three bridges are enrolled in the state bridge maintenance system and receive bi-annual inspections. The weight capacity of the bridges under Orono jurisdiction are as follows: Ferndale, 36 ton; Fox, 60 ton; and McCulley, 33 ton. TRAILS This section addresses network needs for walking and bicycling within the City of Orono. This section includes information on the existing non-motorized transportation network within Orono, connections to land use planning, the planned local non-motorized transportation network, and the planned regional non- motorized transportation network. This section also includes recommendations for intersection improvements and design best practices. This section also addresses the needs of people using wheelchairs and assistive mobility devices such as mobility scooters, as they are considered pedestrians. Existing Non-Motorized Transportation System The existing non-motorized transportation system consists of sidewalks, multi-use paved trails, turf trails, and paved shoulders. Map 4A-6depicts the existing and planned trails within the City limits of Orono. There are currently limited facilities for walking and bicycling in the City, and these facilities serve recreational uses better than transportation uses. There is not currently a connected network in place to serve the needs of people bicycling and walking for transportation. Regional Non-Motorized Transportation Network The Metropolitan Council established a Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) in 2015. The RBTN establishes regional priorities for bicycle transportation so that regional destinations are accessible by bicycle. Regional multi-use trails within the City limits include the Luce Line, Dakota and Independence Regional trails and are owned and operated by Three Rivers Park District and the Minnesota DNR. Several existing and planned trails and shoulders will be key links in the expanding regional non-motorized transportation network. A Tier 1 alignment, identified in the RBTN, includes a segment of Shadywood, north from excelsior, connecting to the Dakota Rail Trail. There are no other connections contemplated by the RBTN. CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 15 Orono Non-Motorized Transportation Network Sidewalks are generally located within newer residential developments and more dense residential and commercial portions of the city. As part of our recreation-open space plan, Orono has developed a trail plan focused on providing links between both local and regional recreational and open space areas, as well as links within the urban areas for pedestrian and bicycle access to Orono’s Navarre commercial area and links between the Orono Schools and the Long Lake downtown area. Connections to Land Use Planning The City of Orono has development patterns consistent with its designation as an Emerging Suburban Edge and Rural Residential community. Existing residential development is low density and commercial land uses are separated from residential land uses. This means that people walking and bicycling must cover greater distances to reach commercial areas from their homes. The development patterns in the City are better suited to bicycling than walking, due to the distance between residential and commercial areas of the City. Non-Motorized Transportation Design Considerations As non-motorized facilities are planned and designed, the City should consult additional planning and design resources, including:  Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan  Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan  MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual  Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices  Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities – American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials  Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities – American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials  Public Rights of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) – US Access Board Accessibility Accessibility is a very important consideration for non-motorized design. All new pedestrian and bicycle facilities must meet the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) accessibility guidelines. To address accessibility issues, the City developed and adopted and ADA transition plan in 2017 aimed at bringing sidewalks, trails, and intersections into compliance with ADA guidelines. Trail Policy It is the policy of the City to encourage the development of sidewalks and trails. In urban densities, sidewalks should be added to at least one side of roads. In all development densities, connections to the existing or planned trail network should be made or rights preserved. The City will support the expansion of trails and or bike lanes if feasible. CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 16 LAKE ACCESS, PRESERVATION AND MANAGEMENT Orono's lakes provide a significant recreational resource for all Orono residents. This value was long ago realized by City leaders. In order to provide lake access for the general public, as well as to provide for fire department access to the lake as a water source, a number of lake access corridors were created as the shore land developed. These typically are platted, dedicated right-of-ways leading from the local road system to the shoreline, and are commonly from 16' to 66' in width. These right-of-ways (often referred to as “fire lanes” or “lake access roads”) vary considerably in their proximity to traffic, parking availability, proximity to housing, lakeshore conditions, and other factors that effect their recreational value. Some of these corridors have been maintained by the City for local swimming beaches or as winter snowmobile and ice-fishing accesses. Certain accesses have docks for fishing, and some have ramp areas suitable for launching a small boat. However, most do not have designated parking available, and are primarily intended to serve the neighborhood rather than the general public. A number of these access corridors have steep topography, shallow water depths, undesirable lake bottom conditions, and/or dense vegetation and experience little or no usage. Of the City lake accesses shown in Table 4A-9, half of those located outside of Big Island are either undeveloped or closed to public use. In addition to Orono's relatively small public lake access corridors, other governmental agencies own and operate significantly larger lake access properties in Orono. These include the DNR Maxwell Bay Access, Hennepin County's North Arm Access and Hennepin County's Noerenberg Gardens Memorial Park. These three large facilities benefit from Metro Transit bus service on their County Road 51 frontage, and are used regularly by visitors from the greater metropolitan area and beyond. The Noerenberg Gardens lack the docks and ramps supplied at the nearby Maxwell Bay and North Arm locations, however the Noerenberg shoreline in Maxwell Bay is a popular place for boaters to anchor and swim. Even more popular destinations for Lake Minnetonka boaters are the Hennepin County beach at Cruiser's Cove on Big Island, and Orono's Big Island Park, which has dockage and hiking areas. Orono also owns and operates Summit Park on Long Lake. Orono offers public lake access through five commercial marinas within its boundaries. Its private recreational facilities with lake shore are Camp Teko on North Arm Bay and the Minnetonka Power Squadron on Big Island. CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 17 Table 4A-9: City of Orono Lake Minnetonka Access Points - Designated Use and Current S ID Access Name or Street Name Plat Section Between Address #s Designated Use UPDATED 4-24-2018 # Notes Brown’s Bay (Lower Lake) 1 End of Orono Lane 2-S 1355/1385 Not open for public use; plat map indicates questionable abutment of shoreline -- Shoreline Drive - “Molly’s Corner” (Outlot A, Dragonfly Hill) 2-S Across from 1410 Shoreline Shore Fishing Hennepin County provides an informal parking area and trashcans at this wide spot along Shoreline Drive; popular fishing spot; winter vehicular access feasible. Fire Boat dockage Smith Bay (Lower Lake) 2 Shoreline Drive at Spates 10-S Adj to 1955 Winter Only Winter vehicular access allowed. 3 North Shore Drive at Shoreline Drive 10-S Tracts S&U, RLS 192; these tracts are on the steep slope adjacent to Shoreline Drive; due to slope and safety issues this access point is not open for public use Crystal Bay -- North Shore Drive 9-S 2605/2655 No longer a public access (“Town Road”) 4 North Shore Drive at Baldur Park Road 8-S 3498/3510 Winter Only 30' wide platted road right-of-way -- North Shore Drive east of Shadywood Road 17-N 3685/3705 33' wide eastward extension of North Shore Drive (Hennepin County jurisdiction) 5 Shadywood Road at Sunset Dr 17-N 1998/2000 15.2' wide platted alley - closely abutting homes on either side 6 Crystal Bay Road (West end) 17-S Adj to 2264 Shadywood 66' wide platted road extending to lakeshore; City also owns 4 adjacent tiny lakeshore parcels to the east for an additional 200' of shoreline, over which a number of inland private parcels claim deeded access rights for “boating and bathing”… status currently under discussion 7 Crystal Bay Road (Relocated extension of Bayview Place in plat of “Wallace’s Addition...”) 17-S 3405/3415 20' relocated alley from Railroad property to shoreline; potential lake access from railway corridor. The only known documentation is Doc. #507616 deed filed Nov. 10, 1908 from Wallace et al to Priebe which states that the 20' strip is “heretofore taken for street purposes” and notes that the platted alley between Lots 18 and 19 was vacated by the District Court. 8 Crystal Bay Road (Platted extension of Hillside Place) 17-S 3339/3345 25' wide platted roadway; contains municipal sewer lines, potential access from neighborhood and Railroad/Trail corridor to lakeshore Maxwell Bay 9 Gibbs Landing - Fox St. 4-S Adj to 3125 Pedestrian year-round, vehicles winter only Tax records show access as Outlot A, owned by owner of 3125, City has easement over Outlot, City maintains access CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 18 Stubbs Bay ID Access Name Plat Section Between Address #’s Designated Use 10 Eastlake Street 5-N 3424/3465 Winter Only 30' platted road gated March 1 - Dec. 1 11 Bayside Rd. at Stubbs Bay Rd. 5-N 3580/3640 Fishing Dock 33' platted road (“Oak Street” in plat of “Bay View Park”) Also used for winter access by snowmobiles off Luce Line 12 Bayside Rd 5-N Across from 3640, 3700, NA Two 60' platted roads and one 65' platted road to the Lake (Park, Spring, and Maple Streets in plat of Bay View Park; and Theresa St. in plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka). These potential access points are not opened for public use. 3750 Bayside 13 Bayside Rd. 5-N West side of 3775 Bayside NA 30' realigned platted road (Realigned “Lake Street” in the plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka) (See street file 3775 Bayside). Not opened for public use. 14 Westlake Street 5-N 372/389 30' platted road right-of-way extending to lakeshore; walking access only. North Arm Bay 15 Park Lane 6-S 607/649 Fishing Dock 60' wide platted road, paved to shoreline - usable for boat launch but there is no parking available 16 Oak Street 6-S Adj to 4119 30' wide platted road, not developed, steep slopes and ravine limit use 17 Baldur Park Road 8-S Across from 1384/1392 NW end of platted developed road as it extends to shoreline 18 Oak Place (Platted road in plat of “Crystal Bay View”) 8-S 3768/3818 40' wide platted undeveloped road extending from North Shore Drive across platted Cherry Ave to shoreline; mostly wetland or under water North Shore Dr 19 Sandy Beach (Extension of Maple Place) 8-S 3898/3908 Swimming Beach 60' wide platted roadway used for City beach Cherry Ave 20 Grant Street 8-S 1310 Spruce/ 50' wide platted road, undeveloped 1330 Cherry Pl 21 Spruce Place 8-S 1250/1260 40' wide (remaining after partial vacation) platted roadway, undeveloped 22 Loma Linda Avenue 8-N 1098/1130 Fishing Dock 40' wide platted road; also useful for vehicular access Forest Lake 23 Forest Lake Landing 7-N 4415/4440 60' wide platted road right-of-way , access not developed, walking use only 24 Elmwood Avenue 7-N South of 1199 20' wide platted road/alley undeveloped right-of-way leading to shoreline 25 “Summit Avenue” (Extension of Elmwood Avenue) 7-S 1067/1101 50' wide platted road undeveloped right-of-way to shoreline 26 “Buff Street” 7-S West side of 1453 Park Dr 50' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline, not developed West Arm Bay 27 North Shore Drive west end (adjacent to Orono/M’trista border) 7-S “4795" 33' platted right-of-way corridor extension of Co. Rd. 19 plus tax-forfeited Lot 10, Block 6, “Bergquist and Wicklund’s Park...”; undeveloped corridor primarily for drainage purposes due to very steep slopes Shoreline CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 19 ID Access Name Plat Section Between Address #’2 Designated Use 28 North Shore Drive at “Adams Street” Extension 7-S 4731/4745 40' platted road right-of-way extension in plat of “Bergquist and Wicklund’s Park...” undeveloped, very steep, used for drainage 29 Rest Point Lane 7-S 1340/1345 33' platted right-of-way corridor, pavement does not extend to lake 30 Rest Point Road 7-S 1405/1410 16' platted road right-of-way widens to about 40' at shoreline, paved but no boat launching available 31 Orchard Beach Place 7-S West of 1530 50' platted road right-of-way extends to shoreline; tree growth and topography limits vehicular access 32 Highwood Lane Extension 7-S 4156/4167 20' platted alley right-of-way to shoreline; steep slope to shoreline, undeveloped Highwood Rd 33 Highwood Road Alley 7-S 4051/4075 20' platted alley right-of-way to shoreline, not developed 34 Corral Road Extension 17-N 1785/1825 20' platted alley mainly for drainage but also walking access Concordia 35 Fagerness Point Accretions 18-N Across from 1965/1985 Accretions to the 40' originally platted road in the plat of “Fagerness”; title registrations by most abutting owners have resulted in dedicated right-of-way no longer abutting shoreline; it appears that there is no public access remaining Fagerness Pt Rd Spring Park Bay 36 Casco Point Beach 20-S 2871/2879 Swimming Beach 60' wide platted road (“Carman St”) used as a City swimming beach Casco Pt Rd 37 Casco Circle 20-S 3195/3205 60' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline at the south side of Casco Circle - undeveloped Carmans Bay 38 “Ivy Lane” (Ivy Place) 20-S 3486/3508 60' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline east of Ivy Place - steep, used for drainage 39 “Spring Street” 20-S 2600/2618 40' wide platted road right-of-way from Casco Point Road to shoreline along south side of plat of “Kaster Cove” - undeveloped, walking access only Casco Pt Rd 40 Carman Street 20-S 2490 Carman/ 30' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, fishing dock 3555 Frederick 41 Lydiard Beach 20-S End of Lydiard Rd Swimming Beach 66' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, used as a City swimming beach Big Island A N. End of “Lawn Avenue” 23-N 110 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 46, Morse Island Park B E. end of “Tooisit Avenue” 23-N 110/120 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 45, Morse Island Park - slope makes use difficult C Unnamed Street 23-N 120/140 90' wide platted r’dway between Lots 38 and 39, Morse Island Park - City has established drivable gravel road for emergency & service vehicle access D “Bay Place” 23-N 210/260 50' +/- wide platted roadway between Lots 21 and 54, Morse Island Park CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 20 ID Access Name Plat Section Between Address #’s Designated Use E “Meadow Lane East Extended” 23-S 280/290 20' wide platted roadway between Lots 59 and 60, Morse Island Park - steep slope makes use difficult F “Meta-Comet Avenue South” 23-S 340 33' wide platted roadway between Lot F Morse Island Park and Lot 3, Morse Island Park 2nd Addition G “Massasolt Avenue West End” 23-S 440/450 33' wide platted roadway between Lot 1, Morse Island Park and Lot 1, Scrivers subdivision of Lot E, Morse Island Park - steep slope H “Meadow Lane Alley” 23-S 450/460 16' platted alley between Lots 5 and 6, Morse Island Park - drivable for emergency and service vehicles I “Pleasant View Street” 22-S 570/600 30' platted roadway between Lot 9, Pleasant View Lake Minnetonka and Lot 3, Island Pointe TRANSIT Orono is categorized as a Transit Market Area IV. Transit Market Area IV has lower concentrations of population and employment and a higher rate of auto ownership. It is primarily composed of Suburban Edge and Emerging Suburban Edge communities. This market can support peak-period express bus services if a sufficient concentration of commuters likely to use transit service is located along a corridor. The low-density development and suburban form of development presents challenges to fixed-route transit. General public dial-a-ride services are appropriate in Market Area IV. The three primary routes serving Orono are Express Route 675 and 677, which provide express service to downtown from the Mound, Navarre and Wayzata commercial areas along County Road 15, and Express Route 674 which provides similar express service to western and central Orono, Long Lake and Wayzata. The TPP’s Transit Investment Plan does not show any transitway investments planned for Orono in the Current Revenue Scenario. (See Map 4A-7).To expand the reach of these fixed routes, the City will promote dial a ride services throughout the city. The Transportation Policy Plan discusses the expansion of Transit Advantages, though none are expressly identified within Orono boundaries. Given the limited right of way and the growing congestion of County Road 15 through Navarre, improvements and programs to expand Transit Advantage in the area should be closely considered. FREIGHT Freight transportation in Orono is primarily served by a Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) rail line parallel to US 12. There are no freight facilities within Orono. The BNSF rail line does not cross any roadways within the City. There are no large freight traffic generators within the City. Most truck and rail traffic is passing through Orono on trips to, from, and through the Twin Cities. Heavy truck traffic is for the most part constrained to roads under Hennepin County and State Jurisdiction. (See Map 4A-8) The development of the lake areas in Orono as seasonal recreational in the late 1800s early 1900’s established many of the transportation patterns found throughout the community. In the lake areas, this pattern led to roads that are substandard to today’s standards. Local residential roads are not designed for heavy freight movement. As the City expands its maintenance program, improvements to turning radii, width, and stormwater retention are considered. There are no known locations where truck access is not available. CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 21 All local city roads are constructed to a 7 ton standard, though weight restricted to 4 ton in the spring months to protect the longevity of the road structure. AVIATION Orono is not in an influence area of a regional airport and is therefore not subject to associated land use restrictions. Airspace protection should be included in local codes/ordinances to control height of structures. There are currently no existing or planned aviation facilities within the City of Orono. However, the City is responsible for airspace protection in order to reduce hazards to air travel within the region. Given the distance to the nearest airports, there are no radio beacons or other air navigation aids located in off-airport locations in Orono. Any person or organization who intends to sponsor the construction or alteration of a structure affecting navigable airspace as defined in Federal Regulation Title 14; Part 77 needs to inform the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) of the project. This notification is accomplished through the completion and submittal to FAA of Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration. In Orono, this requirement applies to any construction or alteration exceeding 200 feet above ground level. The City’s zoning code allows a maximum structure height of 30 feet; therefore it is unlikely that any structures in the City will require FAA notification. There are no seaplane bases located within the City. There are currently no heliports in Orono nor any known plans to construct one. Orono will support the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in the control of seaplane operation on Lake Minnetonka. The existing level of seaplane operation is satisfactory to Orono. The City will support the LMCD in their monitoring of seaplane operation and in any reasonable changes in regulations necessary to prevent seaplane conflict with the primary boating use of the lake. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN This section of the Plan provides the goals objectives and strategies that can help city officials implement the Transportation Plan and make wise long-term decisions. Goals and Objectives The following table 4A-10 displays the goals and objectives of the Orono Transportation Plan. The goals listed below represent the City’s overall vision for transportation over the next 20 years. The objectives listed below provide guidance that the City can use to reach the transportation goals. CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 22 Table 4A-10 Goals and Objectives Goals Objective 1. Facilitate efficient movement of people within and through the City 1.1. Regularly assess transportation maintenance needs and include roadway, trail pavement, and other transportation infrastructure maintenance in the Capital Improvement Plan. 1.2 Efficiently preserve and maintain the City’s transportation system in a state of good repair. 1.3. Provide safe and efficient routes for emergency and public safety vehicles. 1.4. Coordinate with appropriate jurisdiction (MnDOT, Hennepin County) to provide adequate capacity to relieve congestion. 1.5. Encourage sound access management. 1.6 Encourage, with other government agencies, the expansion of multi- modal and transit services in the city to support resident and business transportation needs 2. Facilitate efficient movements of goods within and through the City 2.1. Coordinate with appropriate jurisdictions (BNSF, MnDOT, Hennepin county) to ensure the safe and efficient flow of Freight through the city of Orono 3. Provide a transportation system that is integrated with land use and development 3.1. Coordinate transportation system investments with the Orono Land Use Plan. 3.2. Design, construct, and maintain roadways that fit the character of the adjacent land use 3.3. Require all new (private or public) residential streets be designed to City standards. 4. Improve transportation safety for all users and modes of transportation 4.1. Implement safety improvements to address high crash locations 4.2. Proactively address bicycle and pedestrian safety concerns along roadways and at crossings. 4.3. Bring sidewalks, trails, and intersections into compliance with ADA. 4.4. Support traffic calming and design to minimize speed on minor City collectors and local roadways. 5. Develop a safe and convenient multimodal transportation system 5.1. Invest in multi-modal transportation solutions including bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. 5.2. Preserve and acquire adequate right of way for sidewalk and trail construction. 6. Conserve and enhance environmental resources 6.1. Incorporate storm water Best Management Practices into all transportation construction and maintenance projects. 6.2. Incorporate natural feature preservation into road construction project as practical. 6.3 Incorporate Best Management practices for natural resources within the city rights of Way General Transportation Policies 1. Commuter and general arterial traffic must be directed away from Lake Minnetonka. The sensitive environment of Lake Minnetonka, and the property rights of the riparian landowners, are being damaged by continued reliance on this outmoded roadway location. 2. Orono will actively promote use of the Ring Route and Highway 12 to provide viable efficient alternatives to continued over-use of County Road 15. CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 23 3. Existing collector and arterial roadways will be upgraded as necessary in a manner that does not encourage additional commercial traffic or through commuter traffic on any of the City’s primary north-south collector roads. These roads, specifically Orono Orchard Road, Brown Road, Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road, are primarily located in the rural area and serve a dual function both as collectors and as local streets. Discouraging expansion of their use by non- local traffic will help to preserve the rural character of the area while enhancing safety. 4. Orono will support the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in the control of seaplane operation on Lake Minnetonka. 5. It is the city’s intent to retain lake access (pedestrian, vehicular, boat) for public use. The City will individually evaluate existing lake access corridors and fire lanes as requested, taking into consideration the unique characteristics of each location, such as topography, water depth and quality, lake bottom conditions, the type of vegetation, and any potential for related lake access, drainage, or water quality improvement. 6. As always, both public and private property rights will be considered. To this end, the City will be guided thusly: a. The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public’s right to use of any such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated. b. The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. 7. Orono will consider conversions of private roads to public roads as requested on a case by case basis. The factors considered in evaluating a proposal may include: a. The condition of the street. The condition of the street is consistent with city standards. b. Affected property owners. The desire of the affected property owners. The city does not intend to acquire maintenance responsibility for private roads unless requested by a majority of affected property owners, or c. Safety. If the condition of the road restricts access to the parcels by emergency vehicles, the City may affect the improvements. d. Ownership. Provision of Right of way or an easement Urban Transportation Policies 1. Local streets in the urban area will be owned and maintained by the City. 2. All urban properties should be directly served by the public street system. 3. Urban streets will be constructed to urban design standards. 4. Curb cuts and driveway locations will be limited for traffic safety. 5. On-street parking will be strictly limited. All urban development must provide adequate on- site parking facilities. CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 24 6. The City will pursue additional pedestrian and bike-hike trail facilities. 7. The City will promote improved mass transportation services for urban neighborhoods, including park and rides. Orono encourages improved bus scheduling and improved service, especially at off-peak hours. Rural Transportation Policies 1. Public streets in the rural area will be primarily limited to the existing collector and arterial grid system. 2. The Ring Route concept utilizes as much as possible the existing rural highway system. 3. The City of Orono will encourage all necessary road system improvements required to accommodate and to facilitate through traffic on the Ring Route. 4. Rural residential developments will utilize private road feeders to supplement the existing public road grid. 5. Private rural roadways will be constructed to rural design standards. 6. The City will guarantee reasonable maintenance levels and public access on all private roads. 7. Driveway locations and rural street or private road intersections will be limited for traffic safety. 8. Rural trails are an integral part of the total alternate transportation system. 9. Mass transportation services for rural Orono are not economical, hence the City will promote the use of Park and Ride locations where local service is not feasible. CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 25 Transportation Plans Table 4A-11 Transportation Plan history Policy or Plan Description Adopted Traffic Management Plan Provides a systematic process for the City to address traffic concerns from residents through a consistently applying City Code and other applicable laws and regulations while incorporating a wide variety of traffic management techniques 14 December 2015 Snow and Ice Policy Established the city’s response to snow and ice events that impact the cities roadways. Setting policies for snow and ice management involves balancing the following priorities: public safety, personnel safety, environmental stewardship, cost and Adaptability. Under Review Pavement Management Plan Establishes the standards and priorities for Maintaining the city’s roads over a ten year time period. Further it identifies the annual Operating budget needs for pavement maintenance. 27 October 2014 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan The plan guides the Cities policies and practices with respect to maximizing accessibility and use of city facilities by individuals with disabilities. 13 November 2017 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 26 Appendix 4A-A. TAZ Data TAZ Pop.HH PPH Emp Pop.HH PPH Emp Pop.HH PPH Emp Pop.HH PPH Emp 920 38 12 3.17 6 48 19 2.526 8 60 24 2.500 8 57 24 2.375 8 921 66 24 2.75 215 135 53 2.547 208 307 125 2.456 208 529 221 2.394 201 922 179 58 3.09 120 240 94 2.553 187 315 129 2.442 191 319 133 2.398 190 923 300 118 2.54 247 357 144 2.479 285 381 158 2.411 275 406 169 2.402 249 924 101 28 3.61 14 88 33 2.667 23 89 34 2.618 23 89 34 2.618 21 925 33 14 2.36 3 45 18 2.500 2 52 21 2.476 2 60 25 2.400 2 926 447 156 2.87 190 457 185 2.470 77 465 193 2.409 73 473 197 2.401 66 927 251 93 2.70 9 279 113 2.469 41 300 124 2.419 40 329 137 2.401 38 928 266 98 2.71 16 261 107 2.439 54 280 117 2.393 52 301 128 2.352 49 929 204 77 2.65 0 234 88 2.659 1 276 106 2.604 1 320 124 2.581 1 930 387 123 3.15 11 366 138 2.652 28 400 153 2.614 27 417 162 2.574 26 931 640 224 2.86 51 655 246 2.663 72 698 267 2.614 69 727 282 2.578 66 932 345 124 2.78 11 349 131 2.664 20 346 132 2.621 19 343 133 2.579 18 933 92 34 2.71 2 98 36 2.722 1 100 38 2.632 2 101 39 2.590 2 953 1969 765 2.57 127 2125 825 2.576 101 2177 864 2.520 102 2248 904 2.487 96 954 565 200 2.83 92 611 230 2.657 67 729 278 2.622 70 858 332 2.584 70 955 220 85 2.59 35 226 93 2.430 9 241 101 2.386 18 257 109 2.358 26 956 297 126 2.36 149 315 129 2.442 176 312 133 2.346 197 311 139 2.237 206 957 691 294 2.35 188 766 321 2.386 219 770 335 2.299 217 776 348 2.230 210 958 328 167 1.96 76 431 192 2.245 119 487 220 2.214 185 562 252 2.230 256 971 18 6 3.00 0 13 6 2.167 0 15 6 2.500 0 17 7 2.429 0 7437 2826 408 8099 3201 1698 8800 3558 1779 9500 3899 1801 Appendix A TAZ Data 2010 2020 2030 2040 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Transportation\ORNO_4A-1_FunctionalClass_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/6/2018 2:12:46 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Existing Roadway Functional ClassificationNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Functional Classification Map 4A-1 Principal Arterial A Minor Reliever A Minor Expander A MinorConnector Other Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Transportation\ORNO_4A-2_JurisdictionalClass_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/6/2018 2:23:08 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Existing Roadway JurisdictionNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Jurisdictional Classifications Map 4A-2 MnDOT Hennepin County Municipal Street Private Road )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongL a k eCreekPainterCreek1000 10011002 1003 1004 1010 1011920921922923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931932 933 934 935936 937 941 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956957958 959 961 967 968 969 970 971 972 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 987 989 992 993 994 995 996 MinnetonkaBlvd Lake St Extension Highland Av e P eaveyRoad6th Ave N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19N SunsetD rHunter DrSt a rkey RoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynw ood Bl vd Commerce BlvdHighway 12 E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadS h o r e line D r CountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN N Arm Dr Azure RoadBrownRoadNShorelineDr H ighw ay 7FerndaleRoad W 19th Ave N FerndaleRoadSW ayc liffeN8th Av e N NS horeDr Rice St E WatertownRo a d 3rdAve N WayzataBlvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad McGinty Road W Kelley P k w y Lakevie w AveCounty Road 151 GraysB ayB lvdRanchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St M ap lewo od RoadSparrowRoadLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E 4th Ave N Av onDrP a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn S h o r ewood L n SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave Eagle LnNo r t h e r n A v e Hal st ead LnDove LnM a n o rR o a d 2 0 th Ave N Finch Ln9thA v e NRidge v i e wDr EOld Crystal Bay Road NFox St OldLongLake R o a dDay PlHeritageLnCounty Road 83Rai nbowDrLyric Ave Ringer R oa d Way za ta Blv d Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Arcol a LnGa me Farm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Chimo WWildhurstTrl Moline Road Drake Dr To go Roa d Tamarack DrW Arm Dr Regent s W a lkGaleRoadPea vey Ln C y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Linwoo d RoadKelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90ManitouR o adW ilsh ireBlvdCountyRoad101S hadywood Road G leasonLakeRoadCrosbyRoadB a r tle ttBlvd Highland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NWillow D r SLeaf StTonka w a R o a dMcCulleyRoad CountyRoad110NClover Cir Victoria StBrown Road SI slan dViewDrEastmanLn Ed g e w ater Dr Vicksburg Ln NWPointRoadLaf a y ette RoadBushawayRoadWoodhillRoa dLakevie wPkwy Leroy StStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrCas co Cir Troy L n N Hi llside D rWWayzata Blvd W Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Transportation\ORNO_4A-3_TAZ_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/13/2018 12:12:42 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Traffic Analysis ZonesNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Figure T-6 Traffic Analysis Zones Map 4A-3 TAZ Boundary ####TAZ ID cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE cE ¹l ¹l ¹l¹l¹l¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹l ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m ¹m )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreek!(15!(1 !(1 !(4 !(2 !(4 !(31 !(9!(10 !(1 !(3 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(4 !(1 !(13 !(3 !(17!(35 !(9 !(54!(41!(98!(102 !(53 !(1 !(5 !(46 !(2 !(60 !(7 !(7 !(5 !(2 !(3 !(23 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(5 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(7 !(8!(5 !(4 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(37 !(2 !(1 !(2 !(5 !(3 !(3 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(50 !(2 !(2 !(4!(3 !(1 !(3 !(1 !(2 !(2 !(1 !(3 !(5 !(12!(5!(13 13700 74004900 980 1850160 30051005 1 0 0 4 0 0 0230024001600 2800 43002450100001600130036504600 5800 580012505200 1 0 5 0 660 4500 490 330 850 680 35001600 6 1 0 2800 2 7 51800 5 1 0 48502 2 5 0 1500 53073067038504152700 3900011000 23100 14600 31040501000 1850 1700 530870 260032044002000275017505100130074000 23100 475 6500 6th Ave N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19N Hunter DrStar keyRoad1 8th AveN 8th Ave N BaysideRoad 6th Ave N Sunnyfield Road E 4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d N o r t h e r n A v e 20th A v e N Spring Hill RoadW Branch Road Temp le Dr N Arm Dr Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlTurner Road Highland RoadCounty Road 110 NSussex Dr!(1 !(4 !(7!(3 !(1 !(1!(2 !(16 !(1!(1 !(5 !(15!(8 !(1 !(2 !(1!(2 !(1 !(1!(2 !(1!(3 !(3 !(7 !(4!(12!(6 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(3 !(2 !(2 !(4!(7 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(6 !(9 !(1 !(1 !(13!(3 !(2 !(3 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(2 !(2 !(13 !(1 !(10 !(1 !(2 !(4 !(3 !(1 !(1 !(2!(57 !(6 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(15 !(2 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(1!(2 !(1 !(5 !(1 !(2 !(1!(5 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(10!(14 !(29 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(14 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(9 !(1 !(26!(2 !(1 !(2 !(3!(2 !(2 !(1 !(7 !(1!(2 !(2!(11 !(6 !(1!(19!(5 !(3!(1 !(2 !(16 !(1 !(1 !(30!(6 !(7 !(11 !(2 !(2 !(1 !(1!(7 !(3 !(3!(3 !(2 !(1 !(2 !(15 !(13 !(2!(1 !(163 !(50 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(5 !(11 !(1!(4 !(13!(2 !(7 !(3 !(2 !(4 !(6 !(9 !(13 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(3 !(5 !(9 !(3 !(2 !(2!(1 !(2 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(4 !(11 !(2 !(36 !(5 !(10 !(2 !(53 !(1 !(2 !(3 !(7 !(23 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(3 !(2 !(10 !(5 !(3!(12 !(12 !(4 !(5 !(1 !(8 !(3 !(3 !(2 !(7!(2 !(6!(1!(4 !(4 !(12 !(1 !(7 !(1 !(6 !(2 !(5 !(5 !(8!(4 !(6 !(2 !(30 !(23!(5 !(1 !(10 !(1 !(3 !(1 !(1 !(4 !(7 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(2!(1!(3 !(1 !(1 !(4 !(2 !(3!(1 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(3 !(2 !(2 !(4 !(5 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(2!(12 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(2 !(8 !(4 !(2 !(1 !(7 !(2 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(3 !(2 !(1!(14 !(1 !(2 !(11 !(6 !(3 !(1 !(1!(1 !(1!(6!(4 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(3!(1 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(2 !(6 !(3 !(1 !(6 !(6!(3 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(8 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(15 !(4 !(1 !(4 !(1 !(6 !(2 !(1 !(3 !(1 !(7 !(16 !(2 !(1 !(4!(2 !(1 !(27 !(2 !(3 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(4 !(5 !(9 !(3 !(1 !(7!(1 !(10!(13 !(1!(1 !(12 !(4 !(2 !(10 !(7 !(2 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(5 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(2 !(1 !(3 !(3 !(4 !(1 !(2 !(9 !(10 !(8 !(8 !(2 !(2 !(1 !(2 !(5 !(6 !(2 !(3 !(4 !(6 !(1!(3 !(1 !(7 !(3 !(1 !(3!(9 !(5 !(2 !(1 !(5 !(3 !(11 !(7 !(4 !(3 !(8 !(5 !(1 !(4!(5 !(1 !(1 !(5!(2 !(1 !(2 !(3 !(4 !(9 !(1 !(14 !(1 !(1 !(7!(3 !(10 !(18!(1 !(3 !(2 !(1 !(1 !(4 !(2 !(3 !(8 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(14 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(1!(3 !(1 !(3 !(2 !(1 !(9!(10 !(1 !(1!(1 !(2 !(2!(3 !(7 !(1 !(97 !(6 !(2 !(7 !(13 !(1 !(2 !(8 !(22 !(3 !(1 !(3 !(1 !(25 !(1 !(1 !(1 !(3 !(4 !(6 !(2 !(4 !(4 !(1 !(5 Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Transportation\ORNO_4A-4_Traffic_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 3/16/2018 12:51:34 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Existing Traffic Volume & Crash DataNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Traffic and Crash Information Map 4A-4 ¹m Pedestrian ¹l Bicycle Non-Motorized Crashes(2006 - 2015) Average Annual DailyTraffic (AADT) ####2015 ####2014 ####2013 ####2012 Intersection Summary (2006-2015) !(#Total Crashes Non-Intersection Crashes(2006-2015) cE Incapacitating Injury cE Fatal Injury Severity Summary (Quantity)#Incapacitating Injuries #Fatalities ! !!!!!! !!! ! !!! ! ! !! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k M inne h a ha CreekPainterCreek2300290060063008100180034004200800 250036001100 19002200300 6501000350 31504100950 465059001250 14001600200 27503300550 9900116001700 970011400170011000140003000 430056001300 24503300850 49005700800 17100198002700 11600131001500 49006300140017600200002400 570074001700 17502300550 48005400600 450056001100 18002600800 41004800700 14502200750 45005000500 14600161001500 6901100410 6701100430560800240 11400142002800 420052001000 550074001900 10501400350 480061001300 12000159003900395051001150 640074001000 75008000500 10800143003500 19200220002800440011000 10000 14600 3300 23100 415031040501000 182001850 1700 2550530 2200 870 260032017 2 0 0 275051001300475 7500 20300 6500 Minnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCounty Road 19 NHunter DrSt a rkey RoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynw ood Blvd High way12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad1011 8th AveN N Ar m DrAzure RoadBrownRoadNShorelineDr H igh w a y 7 Ferndale Road W 19th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N N S horeDrRice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NMcGintyRoadW W a y zata B lv d W Kelley P k w y Lakeview AveCounty Road 151 GraysB ayB lvdRanchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St Ma pl ewood RoadLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N Av onDrPa i n t e r R o a d P ar k Ave OrchardLn S h or e w ood L n SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave Eagle LnHal st ead LnDove LnMan o rR o a d 2 0 th Ave N Finch Ln9thA v e NRidge v i e wDr EOld Crystal Bay Road NFox St OldLongLake R o a dDay PlHeritageLnRainbowDrRingerRoad Wayzata Blvd Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Arcol a LnGa me Farm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Chimo WWildhurstTrl Moline Road Wayza t a B l v d W Drake Dr Tamarack DrW Arm Dr Regent s W a lkGaleRoadPea vey Ln C y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Linwood RoadKelly Ave VineHillRoadWilshireB lvdCountyRoad101ShadywoodRoad G leasonLakeRoadCrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadOld Crystal Bay Road SDunkirk Ln NW illo wDrSLeaf StTonka w a Ro a dMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110 NClover Cir Victoria StBrown Road SI slan dViewDrEastmanLn Ed g e w ater Dr VicksburgLnNWPointRoadLaf a y ette RoadBushawayRoadWoodhillR oadLakevi e wPkwy Leroy StStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrCas co Cir Troy L n N Hi llside D rW4013300 7900 295028 0 0 17600 41002700 13504200114001800 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 2000 33501250 5500 315495 4800 11000520 10 5 0 1900 178002250152002400 245092045007200 34044000 148005700 910067059004900405 330 029500 97004900 12000 9900245048507800 23002500150046 5 0 2850 73000 410017502750 290018001400 56000 3 1 5 0 4650 6300 4650 67001170014505700 1050 41000650 47500 4800 6903400 1640039501900 11 6 0 0 5 6 0 2450 14600Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Transportation\ORNO_T04_TrafficA_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/12/2018 10:53:33 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Existing and ProjectedTraffic VolumeNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Forecasted Traffic Information Map 4A-5 !2040 Current Volume2040 ForecastGrowth ####2016 Average Annual DailyTraffic (AADT) ####2015 !¹ !¸ !½!º !» !¾ !¼ )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongL a k eCreekPainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynw ood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadNShorelineDr Highway 7 19th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N N Shore Dr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad W a y z a t a Blv d W Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g eview DrE Day PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spr ingHillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Transportation\ORNO_4A-5_NonMotorizedFacilitiesRBTN_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/6/2018 4:30:41 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Existing Non-Motorized Facilities & RBTNNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Non-Motorized Facilities & Points of Interest Map 4A-6 Points of Interest !¸Marinas !¹Navarre !ºOrono HighSchool !»Orono Ice Arena !¼ OronoIntermediateSchool !½Orono MiddleSchool !¾ SchumannElementarySchoolOther Trails Existing Planned Local Sidewalks& Trails Regional TrailsDakota RailRegional TrailLakeIndependenceRegional TrailLake MinnetonkaLRT RegionalTrailLuce Line StateTrailTier 1 RBTNAlignmentTier 2 RBTNAlignmentTier 2 RBTNCorridorRegional TrailSearch CorridorsRegional Trails -2040 SystemAdditions IA IA IA IA IA IA pT )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynw ood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN Highway 7 19th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g eview DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Transportation\ORNO_4A-6_Transit_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 3/16/2018 12:51:30 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Existing and Planned Transit InfrastructureNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Transit Infrastructure Map 4A-7 Park and Ride IA Existing Transit Routes pT Transit Centers Transit Stops Transit Advantages HOT Lane Meter Bypass Shoulder Lane )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreek1450 1050 3250 1450 1700 2100 14 0 01500 1 3 0 0 1150 150017503850 2650 1400 2350 1200 Minnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynw ood Blvd W ayzataBlvd W Commerce BlvdHigh way12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN Highway 7 19th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w yCounty Road 151 Ranchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g eview DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterbu r yDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Transportation\ORNO_4A-7_Freight_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/6/2018 4:26:31 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Freight, Rail, and Heavy Commercial CorridorsNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Corridors and Information Map 4A-8 Truck HighwayCorridors Tier 2 Tier 3 Railroad Class 1 Heavy Commercial AverageDaily Traffic (HCAADT) 2012#### 2016#### CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4B SANITARY SEWER PLAN Introduction 4B-2 Existing Sanitary Sewer System 4B-3 Table 4B-1 Lift Stations 4B-5 Table 4B-3 Existing ISTS Systems 4B-6 Forecasts 4B-7 Table 4B-4 Sewer Allocation Forecasts 4B-8 Table 4B-5 MCES Projections 4B-8 Table 4B-6 Sanitary Sewer Flow 4B-8 Table 4B-7 Sanitary Sewer Projections 4B-9 Table 4B-8 Interceptors 4B-9 Table 4B-9 Septic Projections 4B-10 Inflow And Infiltration 4B-10 Table 4B-10 Dry/ Wet I&I comparison 4B-11 Table 4B-11 I&I Infiltration Projects 4B-12 Orono Goals and Policies 4B-12 Future Sanitary Sewer System 4B-13 Table 4B-12 Priorities 4B-13 Table 4B-13 Projects 4B-14 Table 4B-14 Maintenance 4B-15 Appendices 4B-A ISTS Ordinances 4B-B Illicit Discharge and Connection Ordinance Division 5, Subdivision V 4B-C MS4 Permit 4B-D Copies of Agreements since 2008 Map 4B-1 MCES System Map 4B-2 MUSA Expansion Map 4B-3 Sanitary Sewer System Map 4B-4 ISTS systems CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 2 INTRODUCTION The City of Orono is required to prepare a Community Management Plan that aligns with the Metropolitan Council’s Metropolitan System Plan every ten years per Minnesota Rule 473.858. An important part of the Community Management Plan is the Sanitary Sewer Plan, which describes the existing sanitary sewer system and outlines the timing and sequence of future improvements. The Sanitary Sewer Plan allows the City and Metropolitan Council to build and improve their sanitary sewer collection and treatment systems so that development can occur in the most efficient and cost-effective manner. This document serves as the sanitary sewer component for the City of Orono’s 2040 Community Management Plan. The City of Orono’s Sanitary Sewer Plan was developed to meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Council’s Thrive MSP 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan. The Thrive MSP 2040 Plan was approved in May 2015 and outlines regional goals for the wastewater system, including environmental sustainability, water reuse, and water conservation. Additionally, the Thrive MSP 2040 Plan includes population, household, and employment projections, and projected wastewater flows. As a result of projected population increases and land use changes in Orono, the Metropolitan Council estimates that sanitary sewer flows will increase approximately 20% between 2010 and 2040. This Sanitary Sewer Plan serves as a guiding document for City infrastructure improvements and expansion. It also outlines the locations in which the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) can expect to see increased wastewater flows, allowing the Council to determine if capacity upgrades will be required at regional wastewater treatment plants and interceptors. Background The City of Orono is located in western Hennepin County and is bordered by Medina to the north, Wayzata and Plymouth to the east, and Minnetrista and Independence to the West. The Cities of Long Lake and Minnetonka Beach are completely contained within Orono. The City of Orono is primarily residential and is dominated in the south by Lake Minnetonka. Approximately 34% of the City is covered by lakes and wetlands. Orono is classified by the Metropolitan Council under the Emerging Suburban Edge and Rural Residential community designations. Orono's long range land use plans call for permanent maintenance of the existing low density rural residential areas. There is to be no staged growth plan for conversion of low density residential uses to higher density residential uses, and expansion of the existing urban service area will occur only within a few specifically planned areas. Therefore, the goals, plans and programs for on-site sewage treatment in rural Orono are intended to be permanently self-sufficient. Potential future demands on regional capacity will be primarily from the retrofitting of existing rural residential neighborhoods where sewer is readily available and where residents are willing to pay the costs associated with its installation. The goals, policies and facilities plans contained in this plan are set in the context of the legislative mandate to plan for regional needs through the year 2040 and beyond. These statistics and programs are primarily applicable to the urban areas of Orono and to the municipal sanitary sewer facilities which serve or are planned to serve these areas. CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 3 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS Land Use Historic development patterns have resulted in a city which is partially urban and partially rural. The citizens of Orono have decided that a long range planning objective of the City is the permanent retention of the rural community. This objective is in line with the existing developed density of the area, with the similar plans of other cities abutting the rural area, and with the legislative intent of metropolitan planning such that expensive urban services not be over extended into undeveloped areas. Sewering of the urban area is necessary. The character and historic density of land use in the existing urban area of Orono, coupled with its general proximity to Lake Minnetonka both required and economically justified the installation of sanitary sewer to alleviate existing health and environmental problems. Rural lakeshore areas within the Shore land and within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) have been provided with municipal sewer service upon request. Residences, existing or proposed within the designated Shore land Overlay District and within the MUSA for which municipal sewer service was requested were and shall be provided with municipal sewer. However, this policy will not preclude development of such areas using fully conforming Individual Sewage Treatment Systems. Metropolitan Council Facilities The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) owns, operates and maintains interceptor sewer and facilities in Orono as indicated in map 4B-1. The Orono system is serviced by MCES meters; M431 and M435. Sewage flows from southern Orono are metered at MCES Meter M435. Flows from north central Orono are metered at MCES Meter M431. MCES maintains six lift stations within Orono; L44, L45, L46, L49, L59 and L60. All sewage outflow from Orono is conveyed to and treated at MCES's Blue Lake Treatment Plant on the Minnesota River in Shakopee. Orono's sewer service capacity is limited by the capacity of the intervening interceptors including the Orono-Long Lake Interceptor, and not strictly by the capacity of the Blue Lake Facility. A history of the MUSA expansion can be found on Map 4B-2. Orono Sanitary Sewer System The City of Orono owns, operates and maintains municipal sanitary sewer facilities as indicated on Map 4B-3. Orono’s sanitary sewer system currently consists of approximately 245,131 ft of Sewer Main, 80,530 ft of Force Main, 1292 Manholes and 44 lift stations, of which a majority was built within the last 50 years. The City of Orono’s existing Sanitary Sewer System limits are defined by the boundaries of the MUSA. Because of topography and historic development patterns, the Orono municipal sewer system includes a number of disconnected sections which can be categorized into 5 distinct service areas. In addition the topography of the area has resulted in the City constructing 44 Lift Stations. 1. Southwest Orono System(MCES metershed M435): This system consists of two sub systems; the Lift Station 59 system and the downstream interceptors system. The Lift Station 59 system consists of all lines which are upstream from and ultimately discharge to MCES Lift Station #59 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 4 (LS-59). The system was constructed with eighteen projects from 1964 to 2007. This is the original municipal sewer system and it still serves the majority of urban Orono. These lines were installed to provide pollution abatement and sewer service to the Navarre business area and to the urban residential areas along Lake Minnetonka. The downstream interceptors system consists of all trunk and lateral lines which directly discharge to the Orono-Long Lake Interceptor (MCES 7113 and 7113A) downstream from L.S. 59 but upstream of Meter # 435. These direct discharges are via City-owned and maintained lift stations pumping into the MCES force main at a limited number of locations. Construction occurred during 1980-2014. 2. Highway 12 Area System (MCES metershed M431): This system consists of all lines which are upstream from and ultimately discharge to LS-60. Construction consisted of sixteen Projects from 1967 to 2018. This portion of the municipal system was initially constructed as an extension of the Long Lake municipal system primarily to provide sewer (and water) service to the Orono High School. This system currently serves all of the urban and commercial area in the North West portion of the city along the County Road 6 and 112 corridor. 3. Long Lake Connections. This system consist of all of the lines that connect directly into the Long Lake Municipal Sewer System. The system was constructed in a series of projects from 1970 to 2018. 4. Wayzata System Extensions: Sewer laterals which connect to extensions of the Wayzata sewer system along Orono’s eastern boundary. Construction consisted of six Projects 1970-2009. This portion of the Orono municipal sewer system functions as an extension of the Wayzata system serving existing housing adjacent to the Wayzata border. 5. Plymouth Direct Connection. The City has one property directly connected to the Plymouth municipal system, St. Edwards Church on North Ferndale Road. No further connections to the Plymouth system are anticipated. 6. Lift Stations. The Orono Sanitary Sewer system is serviced by 44 Lift Stations, listed on Table 4B-1: Lift Stations. 7. Agreements with Adjacent Cities. In order to provide municipal sanitary service in the most cost effective manner the City of Orono partners with neighboring cities. Orono residents are served by connection to Plymouth, Long Lake and Wayzata. Orono provides service to residents from Wayzata, Spring Park and Medina. Table 4B-2 below lists the current agreements with other municipalities. Copies of agreements entered into since 2008 are attached as Appendix 4B-D. CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 5 Table 4B-1: Lift stations LS # Type Address Street SCADA Generator Flow (GPM) Met Council Meter LS-1 Lift 1302 Shoreline Dr Yes 60 M435 LS-2 Lift 1970 Spates Ave Yes Yes 500 M435 LS-3 Lift 3400 Eastlake St Yes 125 M435 LS-4 Lift 160 Stubbs Bay Rd 100 M435 LS-5 Lift 351 Westlake St Yes 200 M435 LS-6 Lift 2478 Casco Point Rd Yes Yes 360 M435 LS-7 Lift 2552 Shadywood Rd Yes 240 M435 LS-8 Lift 2662 West Lafayette Rd Yes 70 M431 LS-9 Lift 1580 Bohns Point Rd Yes 100 M435 LS-10 Lift 115 Orono Orchards Rd 105 M435 LS-11 Lift 1815 Fagerness Pout Rd Yes 100 M435 LS-12 Lift 2030 Wayzata Blvd Yes Yes 240 M435 LS-13 Lift 2919 Casco Point Rd Yes 140 M435 LS-14 Lift 1580 Orchard Beach Pl Yes Yes 250 M435 LS-15 Lift 1375 VINE PL Yes 200 M435 LS-16 Lift 1385 Rest Point Rd Yes 100 M435 LS-17 Lift 1074 Wildhurst Tr Yes 100 M435 LS-18 Lift 1330 CHERRY PL Yes Yes 200 M435 LS-19 Lift 1030 Loma Linda Ave Yes 100 M435 LS-20 Lift 1101 Elmwood Ave Yes Yes 100 M435 LS-21 Lift 4265 Forest Lake Dr Yes Yes 100 M435 LS-22 Lift 2890 Shoreline Dr Yes 100 M435 LS-23 Lift 3017 North Shore Dr Yes 100 M435 LS-24 Lift 4015 Dahl Rd 250 M435 LS-25 Lift 780 North Arm Dr Yes 250 M435 LS-26 Lift 1207 Tonkawa Rd Yes Yes 400 M435 LS-27 Lift 870 Partenwood Rd Yes 250 M435 LS-28 Lift 632 Park Ln Yes Yes 325 M435 LS-29 Lift 754 Tonkawa Rd Yes 250 M435 LS-30 Lift 1799 Lakeview Terrace Yes 100 M431 LS-31 Lift 1579 Long Lake Blvd Yes 130 M431 GS-1 Grinder 2635 North Shore Dr Yes 45 M435 GS-2 Grinder 1082 Ferndale Rd W Yes 35 M435 GS-3 Grinder 978 Ferndale Rd W 15 M435 GS-4 Grinder 907 Ferndale Rd W 15 M435 GS-5 Grinder 883 Ferndale Rd W 15 M435 GS-6 Grinder 1446 Shoreline Dr Yes 35 M435 GS-7 Grinder 2472 Carmen St 15 M435 GS-8 Grinder 1023 Old Crystal Bay Rd 20 M435 GS-9 Grinder 1222 Bracket’s Point Rd Yes 39 M435 GS-10 Grinder 2048 Shoreline Dr 57 M435 GS-11 Grinder 3980 Dahl Rd 15 M435 GS-30 Grinder 988 Partenwood Rd 15 M435 GS-31 Grinder 994 North Arm 15 M435 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 6 Orono Private Treatment Systems The City of Orono’s rural areas are served by Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). Existing ISTS in Orono is shown in Map 4B-4. Orono Code regulating ISTS can be found in Appendix 4B-A. This ordinance was updated in July of 2018 to be consistent with Hennepin County regulations and State law. The provisions specify technical standards, site evaluations, sizing requirements, and minimum setbacks from floodplains and wetlands for individual systems. Every three years the City notifies homeowners to provide maintenance to their septic systems and submit inspection reports to the City. If a complaint is submitted about a septic system, the city is responsible for performing an inspection of the system. City Ordinances (Section 82-224) allows for the establishment of a central system, with the goal of connecting a neighborhood to municipal sewer services within 15 years. The City does not activity encourage private community waste water systems unless long term management, including maintenance and funding, can be addressed. Based on City building records, an inventory of septic services is listed below: Table 4B-3: Existing Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (2018) Residential 1024 Institutional (Churches, Golf courses) 5 Total On-Site systems 1029 Source: City Building Records All public or privately owned Community Wastewater Treatment Systems are included in the residential calculation. FORECASTS Land Use Orono's land use plan calls for development in both the urban and the rural portions of the City. The urban area will see new residential development on the existing vacant lots and undeveloped parcels at densities of 1-25 units per acre. Urban commercial development will be restricted to neighborhood services in the existing Navarre Area and fuller utilization of the industrial and commercial potential near Long Lake. Overall urban density will remain relatively low because of the ecological considerations of proximity to Lake Minnetonka. The rural area will see continued residential development at a slow, steady pace in a manner similar to that of the past three decades. CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 7 Population The Metropolitan Council publishes population and sewer usage forecasts for each city in the Metropolitan Area. MCES use these growth and wastewater flow forecasts to plan future interceptor and treatment works to serve communities. The forecast data in the table below is from the Metropolitan Council’s Local Planning Handbook Community Page for Orono and includes both total and sewered population, households, and employment. Table 4B-4: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 4,429 -- 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2,950 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9,500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 1,780 2,253 2,105 2,455 2,785 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 1046 784 1,095 1,105 1,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,037 3,200 3,560 3,900 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.53 2.47 2.44 Employment 500 809 980 951 1562 1579 1700 1780 1800 Source: Metropolitan Council Wastewater Flows All of the existing and anticipated sewage flow from the City of Orono is treated at the Blue Lake WWTP. The treatment plan currently processes 26 Million Gallons Per day and has a planned capacity of 40 million gallons per day by 2040 (Council, 2016). The 1980 CMP indicated an ultimate interceptor design capacity assigned to Orono of 3,025 units based on a flow of 368 GPD per unit (115 gal/person/day x 3.2 persons/household) totaling 1.14 mgd or 416 million gallons per year (MGY). Under current projections which include land use changes proposed in the Land Use Plan of this 2018-2040 CMP, potential Orono flow rates will slightly exceed the annual flows forecasted by Met Council through 2040 but remain below the ultimate design capacity. The paragraphs and tables below depict the MCES and Orono projections. MCES Projections Table 4B-5 below lists projected total average wastewater flow for Orono. CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 8 Table 4B-5: MCES Sewered Wastewater Projections 2010 2020 2030 2040 Annual Average Wastewater Flow (MGD) 0.58 0.59 0.65 0.72 Total Flow (average day x 365) 211.7 215.35 237.25 262.8 As a point of reference, Table 4B-6 below depicts the amount of Orono wastewater actually delivered into the MCES system from 2012-2016. Table 4B-6: Sanitary Sewer Flow from Orono 2012-2016 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Annual Average Wastewater Flow (MGD) 0.48 0.57 0.63 0.49 0.54 Total Flow (average day x 365) 177.21 207.73 228.52 177.27 199 Orono Projections Orono’s projects are based on the planned development of the existing Municipal Service Areas. The current and projected connections are shown in the table below broken down by Sewer Service Areas. Note that the projections used in this Plan are greater than the MCES projections since they rely on flow estimates for each parcel of developable land, rather than population estimates. Residential Equivalents Connections (REC) The table uses Residential Equivalents Connections (REC) to convert non-residential connection into their residential equivalents. The project flows are calculated based on 1 REC = 250 Gallons / Day (1 REC = 2.5 residents x 100 gal/resident/day). Table 4B-7 is projections based on proposed land use projections, applied to each metershed. CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 9 Table 4B-7: Sanitary Sewer Projections by Interceptor Based on Residential Equivalent Unit (REC) Orono Sewer Service Area 2010 2020 change 2020 2030 Change 2030 2040 Change 2040 M431 458 41 499 140 639 38 677 M435 593 41 634 0 634 66 700 Wayzata 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 Long Lake 372 49 421 140 561 76 637 Plymouth 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 Total 2591 99 2690 203 2893 383 3276 Based on Flow (Million Gallons Per Day) 2010 2020 Change 2020 2030 Change 2030 2040 Change 2040 M431 0.11 0.01 0.12 0.04 0.16 0.01 0.17 M435 0.15 0.01 0.16 0 0.16 0.02 0.18 Wayzata 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Lake 0.09 0.01 0.11 0.04 0.14 0.02 0.16 Plymouth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0.65 0.02 0.67 0.05 0.72 0.1 0.82 Projections for MCES Interceptors. The MCES interceptors forecasted flow are listed in the table below. The interceptors are in series: 8352A->7113A->7113 and 8567->7113. Note the flow depicted is only Orono generated flows that are received within Orono and Long Lake. Orono generated flows that go to Wayzata or Plymouth are not included as they ultimately end up at interceptors 7018-2 and 7027-1. Also, note that the total flow listed is only the flow generated in Orono and does not include any flows from neighboring communities that may also discharge into the particular interceptor. Table 4B-8: Interceptors Flow (MGD) MCES Interceptor 2010 2020 2030 2040 8352A and 7113A 0.11 0.12 0.16 0.17 8567 0.43 0.44 0.45 0.52 7113 0.55 0.57 0.61 0.69 Private Systems Rural areas of Orono will continue to be served by individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS). Sanitary sewers and other urban services will not be extended into the rural area to promote new development or expansion of urbanization. The city does not foresee much increased density in the rural area requiring additional ISTS. Within the rural area, nearly all water supplies are provided by individual wells and most sewage treatment is provided by individual sewage treatment systems ("ISTS"). A number of specific neighborhoods within the Rural Area have been CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 10 or will be provided with municipal sewers to solve neighborhood problems or to protect the lakes, but no other urban services are planned for these areas. Table 4B-9: Septic (MCES Unsewered) Projections 2010 2020 2030 2040 Population 3008 2950 2630 2760 Households 1046 1095 1105 1115 Employment 0 0 0 0 Institutional Systems 5 5 5 5 Residential Systems 1041 1090 1100 1110 City Of Orono Projections Table 4B-9 also projects the number of Institutional and residential systems for 2010, 2020, 2030, and 2040. INFLOW AND INFILTRATION General Inflow is water, typically stormwater, which enters the sewer system through broken manhole covers, sewer cleanouts, sump pumps, foundation drains, and rain leaders. Infiltration is water, typically groundwater, which leaks into the sewer system through cracks in the sewer mains, laterals, joints, and manholes. Water from inflow and infiltration (I/I) can consume available capacity in the wastewater collection system and increase the flow into treatment facilities. In extreme cases, the added flow can cause bypasses or overflows of raw wastewater. This extra flow also requires a larger capacity in the city’s collection and treatment components, which results in increased capital, operation and maintenance, and replacement costs. As a sewer system ages and deteriorates, I/I can become an increasing burden on a City’s system. Therefore, it is imperative that I/I be reduced whenever it is cost effective to do so. The MCES has established I/I goals for each community discharging wastewater into the Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS) based on average day flows and allowable peaking factors. In February 2006, the MCES began an I/I Surcharge Program which requires communities within their service area to eliminate excessive I/I over a period of time. Now, communities that exceed their wastewater flow program year goals, will be required to complete an I/I mitigation assignment that will be required to be implemented in 2018. Nonetheless, flow metering data is available for the meter sheds within Orono, and an analysis of this data as it relates to I/I is presented on the following page. The City’s strategies, programs, investments, and goals for reducing I/I are listed in this section as well Municipal I/I Reduction Much of the City’s sewer infrastructure is over 40 years old, and susceptible to I/I due to their age. In addition much of the city system runs along lake shore and is susceptible to high water periods. CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 11 A comparison of the dry weather flow versus average annual flow versus the average daily flow in the peek rain fall week of that year by metershed for 2021-2016 is given in Table 4B-10. Dry weather flow is calculated as average flow during the months of January through February. The peek weather week is the week is the week with the most accumulation of rainfall. The purpose of this comparison is to give a general indication of the extent of I/I in the region. The data does show a significant difference between peek rain week average and dry weather and average annual flows which indicates I/I. Further action taken by the city starting in 2014 to address I&I appear to be reducing the magnitude of the impact particularly for inflow. The City prohibits the connections of foundation drains and roof leaders to the sanitary sewer system, and requires disconnection of the same. These ordinances are attached as Appendix 4B- B. City code prohibits the discharge of storm water to the sanitary sewer system and requiring the disconnection of existing I/I sources (Sec. 14-189. - Prohibited discharges of groundwater/stormwater into the sanitary sewerage system). The city does experience a high amount of home rebuilds, especially along the lake shore which coincides with a large portion of the municipal sewer system. All new construction is inspected for possible cross connection as part of the sewer connection permit process. In addition, the City has routine activities directed at recognizing and correcting I/I. During the City’s annual sewer system maintenance activities, 20% of the system is cleaned and televised to locate leaks or service connections with continuous flows. Appropriate corrective measures are then initiated with the affected property owner. The results of the inspections are used to develop and prioritize the City’s sewer rehabilitation projects. For the past 5 years and programmed in to the future the city allocates ~$250,000 per years for sewer improvement projects to address I&I issues. 2012 0.4 0.33 0.77 0.08 0.08 0.15 0.48 0.41 0.92 2013 0.48 0.31 1.06 0.09 0.08 0.12 0.56 0.39 1.18 2014 0.53 0.37 1.2 0.09 0.08 0.14 0.61 0.45 1.33 2015 0.4 0.32 0.45 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.48 0.41 0.58 2016 0.45 0.4 0.67 0.1 0.1 0.11 0.54 0.49 0.78 Dry Weather Average Flow (MGD) Peak Rain Event Week Average Daily Flow (MGD) Table 4B-10 Dry and Wet week I & I Comparison Dry Weather Average Flow (MGD) Year M435 Meter Area M431 Meter Area Total Average Annual Flow (MGD) Dry Weather Average Flow (MGD) Peak Rain Event Week Average Daily Flow (MGD) Average Annual Flow (MGD) Peak Rain Event Week Average Daily Flow (MGD) Average Annual Flow (MGD) CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 12 Table 4B-11: Recently Completed I & I Reduction Projects Project Description Cost 2013 Sewer Rehabilitation Lining of 4288 Feet of Gravity main; Manhole lining and joint sealing $ 136,786.00 2014 Sewer Rehabilitation Lining of 4000 Feet of Gravity main; 4 Manhole rehabilitations $ 239,167.00 2015 Sewer Rehabilitation Lining of 4,915 Feet of Gravity main; 35 Lateral linings; 11 Manhole rehabilitations $ 246,198.00 2016 Sewer Rehabilitation Lining of 6,091 Feet of Gravity main; 20 Manhole joint sealed $ 215,177.00 2017 Sewer Rehabilitation Lining of 5,026 Feet of Gravity main $ 213,338.00 GOALS AND POLICIES Goals 1. To provide an adequate, safe level of sewage treatment and waste water disposal for all residences and other occupied properties in the City. 2. To protect Lake Minnetonka, other lakes and streams, surface and ground waters from sewage effluent pollution. 3. To achieve the above goals within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens without becoming an intolerable burden on the landowners or taxpayers. Policies 1. The primary method of sewage treatment and disposal within the Urban Service Area will be municipal sewer. 2. The primary method of sewage treatment and disposal within the Rural Area will be individual on-site systems, because: a. The cost of providing municipal sewer service to the Rural Area is high due to the low density of development and due to the varied topography. b. Development of the Rural Area at densities which would keep the cost of municipal sewer low, would be counterproductive to the City's primary goal of protecting Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. 3. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary in Orono will define areas where sewer exists or where it may be extended to serve existing or new development, but will not define the areas where general urban services will be provided, and it will not define the boundary between higher density and low-density development. CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 13 4. Orono will provide municipal sewer extensions to lakeshore areas and non-lakeshore areas within the MUSA when it is determined that municipal sewer is preferable to long-term use of on-site sewage treatment systems. 5. The costs of extending municipal sewer to existing neighborhoods will be borne primarily by the property owners being served. 6. The costs of extending municipal sewer to serve new residential and nonresidential development will be borne entirely by the developer. FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM Orono’s Plan for future sewer facilities includes upgrades to certain existing local sewer facilities as well as retrofitting a small number of existing neighborhoods with municipal sewer service. These system improvements and expansions are not expected to require additional capacity allocation in metropolitan sewer facilities. MUSA Expansion The city proposes a minor expansion of the MUSA within the time period covered by this plan. Future demands on the sanity sewer system will come as areas within the existing MUSA develop. While the City has no staged development plan, and currently has not scheduled projects outside the existing MUSA, any future MUSA expansions will be considered within the context of the following guidelines: The city will use the priorities outlined in Table 4B-12 to assess whether or not to request a MUSA expansion from the Metropolitan Council. Table 4B-12: MUSA Expansion Priorities Priority 1 Properties that abut the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and all other Orono lakes Priority 2 Properties that abut City-protected tributaries, and all other properties within the Shoreland Overlay District Priority 3 Existing substandard developed lots not covered by Priorities 1 and 2 and developed prior to 1985 that have failing septic systems abd do not have an alternative site available to replace said system. Priority 4 New development using clustering that permanently preserves blocks of open space. Priority 5 Conforming developed lots not covered by Priorities 1 and 2 and developed prior to 1985 that have failing septic systems and do not have an alternative site available to replace said system. Priority 6 New or existing development not covered by priorities 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5. CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 14 Conditions Expansion of the MUSA on the established prioritized basis noted above will occur only when one of the following conditions is found: 1. When an area of existing homes has failing or non-conforming septic systems and replacement drain field sites are not available for a significant share of the existing homes. 2. When an individual home has a failing or non-conforming septic system, does not have an alternate drain field site, is adjacent to existing sewer lines, and is not part of a neighborhood that could be better served by a neighborhood sewer lateral project. 3. When a new or existing residential development meeting all required development standards is adjacent to existing sewer lines and the developer or homeowners agree to bear all costs of extending municipal sewer to the development, but only when inclusion of such development in the MUSA will not result in a decrease in the City’s sewered density as calculated by the Metropolitan Council. Future Sanitary Sewer Improvements The City’s focus on future sanitary sewer needs will be on a limited number of extensions to service new developments within the existing urban area/ MUSA and maintenance to include I&I mitigation of the existing system. Future Sewer Expansion Projects Table 4B-13 below lists possible future sewer expansion projects. Table 4B-13: Projects Improvement Projected Year of Completion Triggering Event 1 Orono Preserve Development - Sewer main to serve 39 new homes 2018 Subdivision 2 Shadywood Villas Development - Sewer main to serve 7 single family homes 2018 Subdivision 3 Brackets Point Sewer Main replacement - Replacement of existing gravity main with a forcemain and lift station, away from the lake 2018 Subdivision 4 CSAH 112 Sewer Main Extension - Extension of sewer main west along CSAH 112 from Old Crystal bay Road to serve future developments planned on the south side of CSAH 112. 2019 CSAH turnback 5 Wildhurst 2019 Subdivision CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 15 Future Sewer Maintenance Needs Orono is committed to maintaining and improving the existing sanitary sewer system. In addition to the normal routine and reactive maintenance operations the city is committed to the following proactive/ preventive maintenance programs: Table 4B-14: Maintenance Program Description Purpose Annual Budget (2018 $s) Annual sewer cleaning and inspections This project includes the cleaning and inspection (televising) of 1/5 of the City’s sewer mains each year. This project is part of the City preventative maintenance program. The results of the inspection are used to determine future maintenance needs and identify possible sources of I&I. $ 45,895 Annual Lift Stations Inspections All 44 Lift and Grinder stations with in the city are inspected annually. The results of the inspection are used to determine future maintenance needs. $7,000 Sewer Rehabilitation Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation projects will consist of Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) lining of infiltration susceptible sanitary sewer pipes, manhole reconstruction, and lid replacement. Reduce Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) into the Sanitary sewer systems. The lining process creates and new durable pipe within the older pipe at a much reduced cost from open curing or directionally drilling. $ 265,225 Lift Station Rehabilitations This project will rehabilitate 2 of the City’s 46 Lift Stations. Rehabilitation includes the inspection, and replacement of a lift stations piping, motors, pumps and control as well as repairs wet well. Ensure the reliability of the city’s lift station system. Allows City to provide extensive maintenance to each Lift Station once every 22 years. $ 110,000 Backup Generator Installation This project will provide a backup generators for 2 Lift Stations per year. This project is part of a systematic effort to provide backup power to critical City infrastructure. $ 150,000 Sewer System Monitoring This project will see the provision of electronic monitoring of 4 additional Lift Stations per year. This project will upgrade/replace components of the monitoring system including antennas, cabling, and uninterruptable power supply (UPS). This is a continuation/ expansion of the project begun in 2016. As of 2017 the city has 30/46 lift stations being electronically monitored. The provision of electronic monitoring for all of the city's lift stations will improve response time to issues, reduce backup incidents and provide real time monitoring and reporting for accountability. $ 26,000 [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú !H!H !H !H!H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H !H )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadS h o r e line D r CountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure Road H ighw ay 719th A v e N8th Ave N N Shore Dr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrSu ga rw oodDrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedgeBlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N L25 L26 L38 L39 L40 L44 L45 L46 L48 L49 L50 L59 L60 M434 M428 M431 M430 M424 M421 M423 M422 M429A M440 M435 M426 M455 To MeterM431 To MeterM435 To MeterISLAND To MeterM429A To MeterM430 To MeterM428 Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_4B-1_MCESSanitarySewerMeterServiceAreas_Parcels_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/14/2018 3:50:02 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN MCES Sanitary Sewer Meter Service AreasNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I MCES Sanitary Sewer System [Ú Lift Station !H Meter GravityInterceptor ForcemainInterceptor Map 4B-1 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake Long Lake Creek Painter Cree k Minneton k a B lvdFerndale Road NLake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6 t h A v e N Sunset Trl NCountyRoa d19 N Star keyRoadWilliston RoadRutledge Road Interstate 494Commerce BlvdHighwa y12ETonkawoodRoadHighw o o d D r Wayzata Blvd W 1 8 thAve N BrownRoadN19th Av e NFerndaleRoadSWoodhillRoadI nte rsta te 394 H ig h w a y 7 8th Ave N Orcha rd Ro a d StoneRoad W atertownRoad Rice St E Ranchview Ln NCarlsonPkwyNNo r t h e r n A v e 21 s t A v e N 3rdAve N Wayzata Bl vd EOld Crystal Bay Road NWillow Dr N22nd Ave NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y HighlandRoadFox St Lake Ave Daniels St LarchwoodDrRi d ge da le DrLakeStE Pkwy4th Ave NCounty Road 83D e v on Dr P ar k Ave S Ln OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave Hunter DrFinch Ln9thA v e NEastw oodRoadRid g eview DrE Day Pl Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadTem p l e Dr Crown Dr N Arm Dr 5thA veNTamarack DrMoline Road Regent s W a lkKen marCirC ygnetPlKelly Ave BakerRoadXeniumLnNCounty Road 101Dunkirk Ln NMcGi ntyRoadECrosby RoadO a kland Ro adLeaf StHarborLnNVicksburg Ln NEssex RoadW ayzata Blvd County Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SVineHillRoadCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr LinnerRoadMcCulleyRoadCounty Road 110 NVictoria StTown Line RoadGay woo dDrIs l a nd ViewDrNiagara Ln NWoodruff R o a d Leroy StStubbs Bay Road NTroy L n N S h o r e line D r CountyRoad10151 1 1 2 31 47 8 27 42 26 7 6 24 48 37 36 25 2223 35 45463 43 34 21 5 32 10 1939 4140 20 29 12 9 50 33 13 14 41149 30 16 2838 17 18 Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_4B-2_MUSAExpansion_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/7/2018 1:51:08 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN MUSA ExpansionNovember 2018 MUSA Expansion History Map 4B-2 * Demolished for Highway 12 right-of-way** Annexed to City of Long LakeDSI = Downstream Interceptor Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 45 46 47 48 49 50 M USA Par t Addition Nam e Lift Station Se r vice Ar e a Zoning Dis trict Acre s Navarre / Fores t Lake / Tonkaw a LS-59 #1135 4/14/1980 LR-1B/C, B-1 to 5 1,285 Orono Sc hools & Indus trial park LS-60 #1135 4/14/1980 RR-1B, I 64 Hackberry LS-60 #1135 4/14/1980 R-1B 17Herrick Circle Wayz #1135 4/14/1980 R-1A 7Chevy Chase Ferndale Green Wayz #1135 4/14/1980 R-1A 47 Mtka Bluf f s / Orono La / W Ferndale DSI #1337 11/23/1981 LR-1A, RR-1B 87 County Road 15 Marinas DSI #1337 11/23/1981 LR-1A, B-2 4Crystal Bay DSI #2131 2/23/1987 LR-1A, RR-1B 44Fulmer Property *LS-60 #2131 2/23/1987 RR-1B 3 Hw y 12 Corridor West LS-60 #2437 5/23/1988 V arious 242 Hw y 12 Corridor East Wayz #2437 5/23/1988 RR-1B 10North Shore / Scotc h Pine LS-59 #3283 5/24/1993 LR-1A 119650 Brow n Rd. N.LS-60 #3283 5/24/1993 LR-1A 3 Fairw ay Hills A ddition Wayz #3283 5/24/1993 RR-1B 5 Long Lake / Fleming Trail **#3283 5/24/1993 24Stubbs Bay LS-59 #3153 8/10/1992 LR-1A, RR-1B 179Oono Sew er Plant Property LS-59 #3348 10/25/1993 RR-1B 4 Nettles Property DSI #3348 10/25/1993 LR-1A 4 North Long Lake LS-60 #3791 10/28/1996 LR-1A 22Long Lake Country Club LS-60 #3791 10/28/1996 LR-1A 23East Long Lake LS-60 #3791 10/28/1996 LR-1A, RR-1B 20 Orono Orchards DSI #3791 10/28/1996 RR-1B 40 Fox Ridge LS-60 #3791 10/28/1996 RR-1B 16Weber hills DSI #3791 10/28/1996 RR-1B 48Edgewood Hills DSI #3791 10/28/1996 RR-1B 20 Bracketts Point DSI #3791 10/28/1996 LR-1A 34 Foxhill DSI #3791 10/28/1996 LR-1A 43Bayridge / Hartw ood DSI #3791 10/28/1996 LR-1A 28Orono Sc hools Hockey A rena LS-60 #3791 10/28/1996 RR-1B 75 Dillman Property LS-60 #3791 10/28/1996 RR-1B 3 Maw ell Bay Area LS-59 #4195 10/9/1998 LR-1A 165Dumas Orc hard LS-60 #4723 11/13/2001 RR-1B / RPUD 70Lake Classen NE LS-60 #4723 11/14/2001 RR-1B 49 East Hac kberry LS-60 #4723 11/15/2001 RR-1B / RPUD 29 V an Eeckhout (Creekside)LS-60 #4723 11/16/2001 RR-1B PRD 31Bluffs Extens ions Hamm-Goetten DSI #4723 11/17/2001 RR-1B 23Tanager Lake DSI #4723 11/18/2001 LR-1A 82 Murphy North Shore DSI #4723 11/19/2001 LR-1A 79 Dickey Lake Shoreland LS-60 #4723 11/20/2001 RR-1B 145Long Lake Shoreland LS-60 #4723 11/21/2001 LR-1A 218St. Edw ards Churc h Plym #4723 11/22/2001 RR-1B 4 French Lake Shoreland LS-59 #4723 11/23/2001 RR-1B 362 Old Long Lake Road Wayz #5063 10/27/2003 RR-1B 19Myrtlewood Road Wayz #5673 10/8/2007 RR-1B 305 & 15 Brow n Road South LS-60 #5959 9/13/2010 RR-1B 4 465 & 525 Leaf Street LS-59 #5959 9/13/2010 RR-1B 7 3060 Fox Street LS-59 #5959 9/13/2010 RR-1B 1850 Way zata Boulevard Wayz #5959 9/13/2010 RR-1B 63245 Wayzata Boulev ard LS-60 #5959 9/13/2010 RR-1B 29 Pr opos e d: 1003 Wildhurst Trail LS-17 RR-1B 10 CM P Am e ndm e nt / Date 51 [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú[Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú[Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_4B-3_SanitarySystem_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/20/2018 2:01:46 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Existing Wastewater SystemNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Sanitary Sewer System [Ú Sanitary LiftStation Sanitary Pipe SanitaryForcemain MCESInterceptor Map 4B-3 )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_4B-4_ISTS_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/6/2018 1:55:39 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Existing Wastewater Disposal FacilitiesNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Existing Wastewater Disposal Facilities IndividualSewageTreatmentSystem Map 4B-4 (1) (2) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ARTICLE II. - ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL DIVISION 1. - GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 58-41. - Purpose. This article is enacted to provide minimum standards for the regulation of subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS) including: proper location, design and construction; necessary modication and reconstruction; operation, maintenance and repair for the purpose of protecting surface water and groundwater from contamination by human sewage and waterborne household and commercial wastes; protection of the public's health and safety; and elimination and prevention of the development of public nuisances, pursuant to the authority granted under Minn. Stat. Chapters 115 and 145A and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080, 7081 and 7082 as amended from time to time that may pertain to sewage and wastewater treatment. All sewage generated in unsewered areas of the city shall be treated and dispersed by an approved SSTS that is sited, designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the provisions of this article or by a system that has been permitted by the MPCA. Sewage discharge to ground surface or surface water. It is unlawful for any person to construct, maintain, or use any wastewater treatment system regulated under this article that results in raw or partially treated wastewater seeping to the ground surface or owing into any surface water. Any surface discharging system must be permitted by the MPCA under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-42. - Objectives. The principal objectives of this article are as follows: The protection of Orono's lakes, rivers and streams, wetlands, and groundwater essential to the promotion of public health, safety, welfare, socioeconomic growth and development of the city in perpetuity. The regulation of proper SSTS construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance to prevent the entry and migration of contaminants, thereby ensuring the non-degradation of surface water and groundwater. The establishment of minimum standards for SSTS placement, design, construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance to prevent contamination and, if contamination is discovered, the identication and control of its consequences and the abatement of its source and migration. The appropriate utilization of privy vaults and other non-water carried SSTS. The prevention and control of water-borne disease, lake degradation, groundwater related hazards, and public nuisance conditions through technical assistance and education, plan reviews, inspections, ISTS surveys and complaint investigation. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-43. - Denitions. [The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a dierent meaning:] Class V injection well means a shallow well used to place a variety of uids directly below the land surface, which includes a domestic SSTS serving more than 20 people. The US Environmental Protection Agency and delegated state groundwater programs permit these wells to inject wastes below the ground surface provided they meet certain requirements and do not endanger underground sources of drinking water. Class V motor vehicle waste disposal wells and large-capacity cesspools are specically prohibited (see 40 CFR Parts 144 and 146). Cluster system means a SSTS under some form of common ownership that collects wastewater from two or more dwellings or buildings and conveys it to a treatment and dispersal system located on an acceptable site near the dwellings or buildings. Design ow means the daily volume of wastewater for which an SSTS is designed to treat and discharge. Failure to protect groundwater means at minimum, a SSTS that does not protect groundwater is considered to be a seepage pit, cesspool, drywell, leaching pit, or other pit; a SSTS with less than the required vertical separation distance, described in MR [Minnesota Rules] Chapter 7080.1500 Subp. 4 D and E; and a system not abandoned in accordance with part 7080.2500. The determination of the threat to groundwater for other conditions must be made by a Qualied Employee or an individual licensed pursuant to section 58-52 hereof. Health authority means the City of Orono and its designated agent who shall be a qualied employee or licensee. Imminent threat to public health and safety means, at a minimum a SSTS with a discharge of sewage or sewage euent to the ground surface, drainage systems, ditches, or storm water drains or directly to surface water; SSTS that cause a reoccurring sewage backup into a dwelling or other establishment; SSTS with electrical hazards; or sewage tanks with unsecured, damaged, or weak maintenance access covers. The determination of protectiveness for other conditions must be made by a Qualied Employee or a SSTS inspection business licensed pursuant to section 58-52 hereof. ISTS means an individual sewage treatment system as dened in Minn. R. 7080.1100, subp. 41. Malfunction means the partial or complete loss of function of a SSTS component, which requires a corrective action to restore its intended function. Management plan means a plan that describes necessary and recommended routine operational and maintenance requirements, periodic examination, adjustment, and testing, and the frequency of each to ensure system performance meets the treatment expectations, including a planned course of action to prevent an illegal discharge. Minor repair means the repair or replacement of an existing damaged or faulty component/part of an SSTS that will return the SSTS to its operable condition. The repair shall not alter the original area, dimensions, design, specications or concept of the SSTS. MPCA means the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. MSTS means a "midsized subsurface sewage treatment system" under single ownership that receives sewage from dwellings or other establishments having a design ow of more than 5,000 gallons per day to a maximum of 10,000 gallons per day. Notice of noncompliance means a written document issued by the city notifying a system owner that the owner's onsite/cluster treatment system has been observed to be noncompliant with the requirements of this article. (1) (2) (3) (4) Qualied employee means an employee of the state or City of Orono, who performs site evaluations or designs, installs, maintains, pumps, or inspects SSTS as part of the individual's employment duties and is registered on the SSTS professional register verifying specialty area endorsements applicable to the work being conducted. Other establishment means any private or public structure, other than a dwelling, that generates sewage having characteristics other than residential-type waste or has an average waste ow greater than 2,000 gallons per day and discharges to an individual sewage treatment system. Owner means the fee owner(s) and, if applicable, the contract-for-deed purchaser. Ownership interests shall be determined by reference to the records of Hennepin County. The owner of each lot served by an ISTS is responsible for the lawful operation and maintenance of each ISTS. Record drawings means a set of drawings which to the fullest extent possible document the nal in-place location, size, and type of all SSTS components including the results of any materials testing performed and a description of conditions during construction of the system. Sewage means waste from toilets, bathing, laundry, or culinary activities or operations or oor drains associated with these sources, including household cleaners and other constituents in amounts normally used for domestic purposes. SSTS means subsurface sewage treatment system as dened in Minn. R. 7080.1100, subp. 82. Type I system means an ISTS designed according to Minn. R. parts 7080.2200 to 7080.2240, as may be amended from time to time. Type II system means an ISTS designed according to Minn. R. parts 7080.2250 to 7080.2290, as may be amended from time to time. Type III system means an ISTS designed according to Minn. R. 7080.2300, as may be amended from time to time. Type IV system means an ISTS designed according to Minn. R. 7080.2350, as may be amended from time to time. Type V system means an ISTS designed according to Minn. R. 7080.2400, as may be amended from time to time. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-44. - Incorporation by reference. This article hereby incorporates by reference Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 and 7081, as may be amended from time to time. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-45. - Administration by the health authority. The health authority shall have the following duties and responsibilities: To review all applications for SSTS. To issue all required permits. To conduct construction inspections and to perform all necessary tests to determine its conformance with this article. To investigate complaints regarding SSTS. (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (1) (2) (3) (4) To perform compliance inspections and to issue Certicates of Compliance or Notices of Noncompliance wh To issue Stop Work Orders and Notices of Violation pursuant to this article. To take complaints to the municipal or county attorney for violations of this article. To maintain proper records for SSTS including site evaluation records, design records including calculations and summaries for all system component sizings and as-builts, complaints on noncompliance, compliance inspections, site evaluations, applications and exhibits, variance requests, issued permits, certicates of compliance, and enforcement proceedings. To submit annual reports to the MPCA to demonstrate enforcement of this article per Chapter 7082.0040 Subpart 5. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-46. - No guarantee. Neither the issuance of permits, certicates of compliance nor notices of noncompliance as requested or issued shall be construed to represent a guarantee or warranty of the system's operation or eectiveness. Such certicates signify that the system in question is or has been designed and installed in compliance or non-compliance with the provision of these standards and regulations. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) DIVISION 2. - PERMITTING Sec. 58-47. - Required permits. A permit from the health authority is required before any SSTS in Orono's jurisdiction is installed, replaced, abandoned, altered, repaired, rejuvenated or extended pursuant to this article. Such permits are not transferable as to person or place. Such permits shall expire 12 months after date of issuance. Upon request of an inspector, permits shall be provided by the permittee at the time of inspection. New residence. No building permit shall be issued for any new building that will be connected to an ISTS until a site evaluation and design is approved by the on-site systems manager. The site evaluation must include the identication of both primary and alternate draineld sites suitable for a minimum of a ve-bedroom residence. If the building will be connected to an existing system, a site evaluation and design must be approved by the city, including the existing system specications and a future site meeting the provisions of this article. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-48. - Permits not required. Permits shall not be required for the following activities: Repair or replacement of pumps, oats or other electrical devices of the pump. Repair or replacement of baes in the septic tank. Installation or repair of inspection pipes and manhole covers. Repair or replacement of the line from the building to the septic tank. (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (1) (2) (3) (4) Repair or replacement of the line from the septic tank or pump chamber to the distribution box or lines. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-49. - Permit application. All applications for an SSTS permit shall include the following information: Name and address of property owner. Property identication number. Legal description of the property. SSTS designer name, address, telephone number and state MPCA license number; (or health authority qualied employee name and number). SSTS installer name, address, telephone number and MPCA license number. Site evaluation report on forms approved by the health authority and include information required by [Minn. R.] sections 7080.1710—7080.2400. System design with full information including applicable construction information on forms approved by the Health Authority. The location of two or more designated additional soil treatment areas that can support system as described in Minn. R. parts 7080.2200 through 7080.2230 or site conditions described in Minn. R. 7081.0270, subps. 3 through 7, on lots created after January 23, 1996. A management plan as described in Minn. R. 7082.0600 and this article; and Any other information requested pertinent to the process. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-50. - Operating permit. An operating permit is required for all treatment systems installed under Minn. R. 7080.2290 (holding tanks), Minn. R. 7080.2350—7080.22400 (Type IV and V systems), and Minn. R. ch. 7081 (MSTS). Sewage shall not be discharged to a treatment system requiring an operating permit until the health authority certies that the treatment system was installed in substantial conformance with the approved plans, receives the nal record drawings of the SSTS, and a valid operating permit is issued to the owner. The operating permit shall be valid for 12 months and renewed by the expiration date. The health authority shall review all required monitoring data submitted from the previous year and the renewal application before approving any subsequent operating permits. An operating permit shall include: A. A detailed description of the operation, maintenance, and monitoring, reporting and compliance limits and boundaries necessary to ensure both continued system performance as designed and protection of public health and the environment for the life of the system; A requirement that the person responsible for monitoring notify the health authority when monitoring plan requirements are not met; A disclosure of the location and condition of the additional soil treatment and dispersal system; A stipulation of acceptable and prohibited discharges; and (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) The signatures of the system designer and owner. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-51. - Compliance monitoring. Performance monitoring of a SSTS shall be performed by a licensed service provider hired by the holder of the operating permit in accordance with the monitoring frequency and parameters stipulated in the permit. A monitoring report shall be prepared and certied by the licensed service provider. The report shall be submitted to the city on a form provided by the city on or before the compliance reporting date stipulated in the operating permit. The report shall contain a description of all maintenance and servicing activities performed since the last compliance monitoring report as described below: Owner name and address; Operating permit number; Average daily ow since last compliance monitoring report; Description of type of maintenance and date performed; Description of sample taken (if required), analytical laboratory used, and results of analyses; Problems noted with the system and actions proposed or taken to correct them; and Name, signature, license and license number of the licensed professional who performed the work. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-52. - License requirements. All design, installation, alteration, repair, maintenance, operation, pumping, and inspection activities for SSTS located in the city must be completed by a business licensed by the state under Minn. R. ch. 7083, an appropriately certied qualied employee, or a person exempted under Minn. R. 7083.0700, subps. 1(A), (C), (D), (F), (G), (H) and (I). Individuals exempt from a state SSTS license under Minn. R. 7083.0700, subps. 1(A), (C), (D), (F), (G), (H) and (I) must follow all applicable local, state, and federal requirements. Property owners that employ a business to perform this work must hire a business that is licensed in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7083. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-53. - Application review and determination. If after consideration of the application for a permit, the health authority determines that the proposed work complies with provision of this article, the health authority shall issue a written permit granting preliminary approval authorizing initiation of the work as proposed. If the health authority determines that the proposed work will not comply with the provisions of this article, the health authority shall deny the permit application. The permit application may be revised or corrected and resubmitted to the health authority for reconsideration. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-54. - Variances. (1) (2) (3) (a) (1) (2) a. b. (b) (1) (2) (3) (c) Variances to wells and water supply lines require approval from the Minnesota Department of Health. The health authority may grant variances to the technical standards and criteria of Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7080 or this article. However, the health authority is prohibited from granting variances to: Minn. R. 7080.2150, subp. 2. Minn. R. 7081.0080, subps. 2 to 5 Flow determinations under Minn. R. 7081.0110 if the deviation reduces the average daily ow from more than 10,000 gallons to 10,000 gallons per day or less. All requests for a variance shall be requested in writing to the health authority on forms approved by the health authority. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-55. - Periodically saturated soil disagreements. If a documented discrepancy arises on the depth of the periodically saturated soil between licensed businesses for SSTS design or compliance purposes, all disputing parties must follow the procedure outlined in this subpart. The disputing parties must meet at the disputed site in an attempt to resolve dierences. If the provision does not resolve the dierences, then: Obtain an opinion from a Minnesota licensed professional soil scientist who is a certied SSTS designer or inspector and who is independent of, and agreed upon by, both parties. If opinions rendered do not resolve the dispute, all initial and follow-up documents and information generated must be submitted to the health authority. The health authority shall take into consideration all information and opinions rendered and make a nal judgment. The health authority shall render ndings of fact, conclusions of law, and ndings setting forth the reasons for any nal decisions it renders. If a documented discrepancy arises on the depth of the periodically saturated soil between an SSTS licensed business and the health authority for SSTS design or compliance purposes, all disputing parties shall follow the procedure outlined in this item. A representative of the health authority and the licensed business must meet at the disputed site in an attempt to resolve dierences. If the provision does not resolve dierences, then the SSTS licensed business may obtain an opinion from a Minnesota licensed professional soil scientist who is a certied SSTS designer or inspector and who is independent of, and agreed upon by, both parties. If still unresolved, the health authority shall take into consideration all information and opinions rendered and make a nal judgment. The health authority shall render ndings of fact, conclusions of law, and ndings setting forth the reasons for any nal decisions they render. Upon resolution of a dispute, amendments to initial disputed documents containing the resolution shall be made and submitted to the health authority and all other parties involved. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) DIVISION 3. - CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS Sec. 58-56. - Requirements. Compliance inspections shall be conducted by the health authority anytime a SSTS is installed, replaced, abandoned, altered, repaired, rejuvenated, or extended. The installation and construction of the SSTS shall be in accordance with the permit requirements and application design. If any SSTS component is covered before being inspected by the health authority, it shall be uncovered if so ordered by the health authority. Proposals to alter the permitted construction shall be reviewed and the proposed change accepted by the health authority prior to construction. Inspections shall be conducted at least once during the construction that is prior to covering of the ISTS to assure that the system has been constructed per the submitted and approved design. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-57. - Inspector. Compliance inspections for construction, replacement, alteration or repair work on SSTS shall be conducted by the health authority. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-58. - Request for inspection. It shall be the duty of the permittee to notify the health authority of the date and time the inspection is requested at least 24 hours (excluding weekend days and holidays) preceding the requested inspection time. If the permitee provides proper notice as described above and the health authority does not appear for an inspection within two hours after the time scheduled, the permitee may complete the installation and submit an as-built for the system. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-59. - Access to premises and records. Upon the request of the health authority, the applicant, owner, permittee or any other person shall allow access at any reasonable time to the aected premises as well as any related records, for the purposes of regulating and enforcing this article. If entry is refused, the health authority shall have recourse to the remedies provided by law to secure entry. No person shall hinder or otherwise interfere with the health authority in the performance of their duties and responsibilities pursuant to the enforcement of this article. Refusal to allow reasonable access to the health authority shall be deemed a separate and distinct oense, whether or not any other specic violations are cited. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-60. - Stop work orders Whenever any SSTS work is being done contrary to the provisions of this article, the health authority may order the work stopped by verbal or written notice served upon the installer or the owner of the land. All installation and construction shall cease and desist until subsequent authorization to proceed is received from the health authority. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) (1) (2) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Sec. 58-61. - As-builts. As-builts shall be submitted to the health authority within ve working days of completion of the work on the ISTS on forms provided or approved by the health authority. The as-built shall include photographs of the system prior to covering and a certied statement that the work was installed in accordance with submitted design and permit conditions and that it was free from defects. If an as-built is not submitted, the health authority may require the uncovering of the system for inspection. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-62. - Inspection reports. A certicate of compliance or notice of noncompliance shall be prepared by the health authority following an inspection or review of as-builts submitted in accordance with section 58-61. A certicate of compliance or notice of noncompliance shall include a signed statement by the inspector identifying the type of ISTS inspected and whether the system is in compliance with Minnesota Rules. A copy of the certicate of compliance or notice of noncompliance shall be provided to the property owner within 30 days of the compliance inspection and a copy kept on le with the health authority. Certicates of compliance issued by the health authority for new construction and replacement shall be valid for ve years from the date of the compliance inspection or as-built certication unless the health authority or licensed inspector identies the system as an imminent threat to public health and safety. Notices of violation may be issued with notices of noncompliance when the health authority determines that new construction, replacement or repairs are not in compliance with this article. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) DIVISION 4 - EXISTING SYSTEMS Sec. 58-63. - Requirements. The health authority shall require a compliance inspection on MPCA Compliance Inspection Form of an existing system whenever: In designated Shoreland Management or Wellhead Protection Areas, an application for any type of building or land use permit is made. The health authority deems a compliance inspection necessary, including, but not limited to, upon receipt of information of a potential ISTS failure or Imminent Threat to Public Health and Safety. An additional bedroom on the property is requested. If a request for an additional bedroom is received between November 1 and April 30, the governing municipality may issue a building permit immediately with the contingent requirement that a compliance inspection of the existing ISTS shall be completed by the following June 1 and the applicant submits a certicate of compliance by the following September 30. Any addition or remodel of a licensed food, beverage, or lodging establishment or any Other Establishment where the sewage treatment system's designed ow may be eected. Abandonment of existing systems. Whenever the use of a SSTS or any system component is discontinued as the result of a system repair, modication, replacement or decommissioning following connection to a municipal or private sanitary sewer, or condemnation or demolition of a building served by the system, (a) (1) (b) (1) further use of the system or any system component for any purpose is prohibited. Abandonment shall be completed in accordance with Minn. R. 7080.2500. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-64. - Inspector. Only a certied inspector from the health authority or a licensed inspection business shall conduct an inspection when a compliance inspection is required for an existing SSTS. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-65. - Vertical separation. SSTS built after March 31, 1996. A SSTS located in a shoreland area, wellhead protection area, or serving a food, beverage, or lodging establishment as dened under Minn. R. 7080.1100, subp. 84 must have a three- foot vertical separation between the bottom soil inltrative surface and the periodically saturated soil and/or bedrock. Unless otherwise determined by the health authority, existing systems that have no more than a 15 percent reduction to the minimum required 36 inch separation distance are considered compliant. (i.e., a separation distance no less than 30.6 inches). This reduction is to account for settling of sand or soil, normal variation of separation distance measurements and interpretation of limiting layer characteristics. The vertical separation measurement shall be made outside the area of system inuence in an area of similar soil. SSTS built after March 31, 1996 located outside shoreland, wellhead protection, or serving food, beverage, or lodging establishments as dened under part 7080.1100, subpart 84, must have at least three feet of vertical separation. SSTS built before April 1, 1996, in areas that are not shoreland, wellhead protection, or serving food, beverage, or lodging establishments SWF areas as dened under part 7080.1100, subpart 84, must have at least two feet of vertical separation. SSTS built before April 1, 1996, in areas that are within shoreland, wellhead protection areas, or serving food, beverage, or lodging establishments as dened under part 7080.1100, subpart 84, must have at least three feet of vertical separation. Table 1. Vertical Separation Summarized Within Shoreland, Well Protection, or Food, Beverage, or Lodging Outside Shoreland, Well Protection, or Not in Food, Beverage, or Lodging Built before April 1, 1996 3 feet separation, minimum 2 feet separation, minimum Built after March 31, 1996 3 feet separation, minimum 3 feet separation, minimum   (1) (2) a. b. (1) (2) (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-66. - Inspection reports. A copy of the certicate of compliance or notice of noncompliance resulting from a compliance inspection shall be provided to the property owner and the health authority within 30 calendar days of inspection. Certicates of compliance issued by a licensed ISTS Inspector for an existing system shall be valid for three years from the date of the compliance inspection unless the health authority or licensed inspector identies the system as an imminent threat to public health and safety. A notice of noncompliance shall be issued in the following circumstances and the conditions noted in violation of this article shall be remedied as follows: An SSTS determined to be failing to protect groundwater shall be upgraded, replaced, or repaired in accord with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 or 7081, within three years, or its use is discontinued. The health authority, at its discretion, may grant an extension of an additional two years. An SSTS posing an Imminent Threat to Public Health and Safety shall be upgraded, replaced or repaired within ten months. The health authority will give consideration to weather conditions in determining compliance dates. If an SSTS is determined to be a public health nuisance by the health authority, the health authority may order the owner of the SSTS to cease use immediately and not allow use of the SSTS until it is corrected in accordance with the recommendations of the health authority. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) DIVISION 5. - VIOLATIONS Sec. 58-67. - Cause to issue a notice of violation. Noncompliance with this article by an applicant, permittee, installer or other person, as determined by the health authority, shall constitute a violation. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-68. - Serving a notice of violation. The health authority shall serve, in person or by mail, a notice of violation upon any person determined to be not in compliance with this article. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-69. - Contents of a notice of violation. A notice of violation shall contain the following: A statement documenting the ndings of fact determined through inspections, reinspection or investigation. A list of specic violation or violations of this article. (3) (4) (a) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) The specic requirements for correction or removal of the specied violation(s). A mandatory time schedule for correction, removal and compliance with this article. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-70. - Notication of MPCA. The health authority shall in accordance with state law notify the MPCA of any inspection, installation, design, construction, alteration or repair of an ISTS by a licensed person or any pumping by a licensed pumper performed in violation of the provisions of this article. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) DIVISION 6. - ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Sec. 58-71. - Property transaction standards for individual sewage treatment systems. No owner of a tract of land upon which a dwelling is located, or a tract of land upon which a structure which is required to have an individual sewage treatment system is located, shall sell or transfer to another party said tract of land, unless the following requirements are met: The seller of any property having an individual sewage treatment system shall have a state licensed inspector complete the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) sewage system compliance inspection form for existing sewage systems in accordance with this article and Minnesota Rules chapter 7080. The exception would be a new septic system installed within the previous ve years or a compliance inspection performed by a licensed inspector within the previous three years. The seller must provide a copy of the completed sewage system disclosure form and the certicate of compliance or notice of non-compliance to any person who signs a purchase agreement. The disclosure form and certicate of compliance or notice of non-compliance inspection form must be provided to the buyer prior to signing the purchase agreement. The licensed inspector must submit a copy of the certicate of compliance or notice of non-compliance to the city within 15 days of the date of inspection. If the existing system is found to be out of compliance it must be brought into compliance prior to transfer of the property. If the system is not brought into compliance prior to transfer, the seller shall provide the buyer sucient security in the form of an escrow agreement to assure the installation of a complying ISTS. If the seller fails to provide a certicate of compliance, the seller shall provide the buyer sucient security in the form of an escrow agreement to assure the installation of a complying ISTS. The security shall be placed in an escrow with a licensed real estate closer, licensed attorney-at-law or a federal or state chartered nancial institution. The amount escrowed shall be equal to 150 percent of a written estimate to install a complying ISTS provided by a licensed and certied installer, or the amount shall be equal to 110 percent of the written contract price for the installation of a complying ISTS provided by a licensed and certied installer. After a complying ISTS has been installed and a certicate of compliance issued, the City of Orono shall provide the escrow agent a copy of the certicate of compliance. (1) (2) (3) a. b. c. (4) (1) (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-72. - Siting of an SSTS. Notwithstanding any state or federal requirements, the separation distance from an SSTS to a Type 3, 4, 5 or 6 wetland shall be no less than 50 feet. SSTS in ood plains. No permit shall be issued for SSTS located in a oodway and wherever possible, location within any part of a oodplain should be avoided. If no option exists to locate a SSTS outside of a oodplain, location within the ood fringe is allowed if the requirements of Minn. R. 7080.2270 and all relevant local requirements are met. Class V injection wells. All owners of new or replacement SSTS that are considered to be Class V injection wells as dened in the Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, part 144, are required to submit SSTS inventory information to the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the MPCA. Owners are also required to identify all Class V injection wells in property transfer disclosures. Holding tanks. Holding tanks may be used for the following applications only after it can be shown conclusively by the property owner that a SSTS permitted under this article cannot be feasibly installed: As a replacement for an existing failing SSTS; For an SSTS that poses an Imminent Threat to Public Health and Safety; or For use with buildings with limited water use. Determination of hydraulic loading rate and SSTS sizing. Table IX from Minn. R. 7080.2150, subp. 3(E) entitled "Loading Rates for Determining Bottom Absorption Area and Absorption Ratios Using Detailed Soil Descriptions"" and Table IXa from Minn. R. 7080.2150, subp. 3(E) entitled "Loading Rates for Determining Bottom Absorption Area" Using Percolation Tests" and herein adopted by reference shall both be used to size SSTS inltration areas using the larger sizing factor of the two for SSTS design. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-73. - Maintenance report. Licensed maintenance businesses must abide by the requirements described in Minn. R. 7083.0770, subp. 2. All written reports required by Minn. R. 7083.0770, subp. 2 must be provided to the homeowner and the health authority within 30 days after any maintenance work is performed. Systems not operated under a management plan. Owners of SSTS that are not operated under a management plan or operating permit must inspect treatment tanks and remove solids if needed every three years. Solids must be removed when their accumulation meets the limit described in Minn. R. 7080.2450. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-74. - Special provisions for Lake Minnetonka Islands. (1) (2) a. b. c. d. (3) a. b. c. d. e. f. All lots, properties, buildings and structures on Big Island, Mahpiyata Island and Deering Island, Lake Minnetonka, shall be provided with SSTS's which comply with the requirements of this article, as amended by the following special provisions and specic exceptions pertaining to island properties: Systems not required. Vacant property or property used solely for one-family seasonal recreational use of land without structures, or with accessory structures only, as permitted in the RS zoning district, need not be provided with an SSTS, provided that, at any time such property is actually in use by one or more persons for overnight or longer stays, an approved marine toilet or portable holding tank toilet shall be available on the property or within a watercraft docked or moored at the property. SSTS required. Each building or structure within the RS zoning district must be connected to an ISTS according to the provisions of this article as follows: For each principal dwelling. For each dwelling on a property containing two or more dwellings pursuant to a private guest cabin conditional use permit. For each seasonal dwelling over 800 square feet in oor area. For any dwelling or building which has water plumbed inside and has a sink, toilet, tub or other plumbing xture. Alternative SSTS permitted. Outhouses, incinerating devices, composting devices or small portable holding tank toilets are permitted as follows: Seasonal dwellings of less than 800 square feet in oor area. Seasonal recreational use of land without structures, or with accessory structures only. Any other permitted or conditional use only upon approval of a variance issued by the council. Outhouses shall be constructed in accordance with Minnesota Rules chapter 7080, except that sealed vault type outhouses shall not be permitted. Existing outhouses not conforming to any or all of the above requirements shall be abandoned, lled in and the superstructure removed within ten months of notication that a noncompliant system exists. Island septic systems are exempt from the ve bedroom minimum sizing standards for new construction and may be sized for actual water use. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) DIVISION 7. - ENFORCEMENT Sec. 58-75. - Violation, false statement. Any person, rm, corporation or other entity who violates any of the provisions of this article or who makes any false statement on a certicate of compliance, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment or a ne or both, as dened by law. Each day in violation may constitute a separate violation. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Sec. 58-76. - Other remedies. In the event of a violation of this article, in addition to other remedies, the county or municipal attorney may institute appropriate actions or proceedings to prevent, restrain, correct or abate such violations. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) DIVISION 8. - FEES [Sec. 58-77. - Fees.] The Orono City Council shall from time to time establish fees for activities undertaken by the health authority pursuant to this article. Fees shall be due and payable at a time and in a manner to be determined by the health authority. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) DIVISION 9. - SEVERABILITY [Sec. 58-78. - Severability.] If a provision or application of this article is held invalid, that invalidity shall not aect the validity of other provisions or applications of this article. (Ord. No. 212 3rd series, § 1, 8-13-2018) Secs. 58-79—58-115. - Reserved. (a) (b) (a) (1) (2) Subdivision V. - Stormwater Illicit Discharge and Illicit Connection Sec. 14-301. - Purpose. The purpose of this subdivision is to promote, preserve and enhance the natural resources within the city and protect them from adverse eects occasioned by non-stormwater discharges by regulating discharges that would have an adverse and potentially irreversible impact on water quality and environmentally sensitive land. (Ord. No. 56 3rd series, § 2, 4-13-2009) Sec. 14-302. - Findings. The city council hereby nds that non-stormwater discharges to the city's municipal separated storm sewer system are subject to higher levels of pollutants that enter into receiving water bodies adversely aecting the public health, safety and general welfare by impacting water quality, creating nuisances, and impairing other benecial uses of environmental resources. (Ord. No. 56 3rd series, § 2, 4-13-2009) Sec. 14-303. - Administration. The city and its authorized representatives are authorized to administer, implement, and enforce the provisions of this subdivision. (Ord. No. 56 3rd series, § 2, 4-13-2009) Sec. 14-304. - Illegal disposal and dumping. No person shall throw, deposit, place, leave, maintain, or keep any substance upon any street, alley, sidewalk, storm drain, inlet, catch basin conduit or drainage structure, business place, or upon any public or private land, so that the same might be or become a pollutant, unless the substance is in containers, recycling bags, or any other lawfully established waste disposal device. No person shall intentionally dispose of grass, leaves, dirt, or landscape material into a water resource, buer, street, road, alley, catch basin, culvert, curb, gutter, inlet, ditch, natural watercourse, ood control channel, canal, storm drain or any fabricated natural conveyance. (Ord. No. 56 3rd series, § 2, 4-13-2009) Sec. 14-305. - Illicit discharges and connections. No person shall cause any illicit discharge to enter the storm sewer system or any surface water unless such discharge: Consists of non-stormwater that is authorized by an NPDES point source permit obtain from the MPCA; Is associated with re ghting activities or other activities necessary to protect public health and safety; (3) (4) (b) (c) (d) (1) a. b. c. (2) (3) (4) a. b. Is one of the following exempt discharges: water line ushing or other potable water sources, landscap lawn watering, diverted stream ows, rising ground water, ground water inltration to storm drains, un pumped ground water, foundation or footing drains (not including active groundwater dewatering syst space pumps, air conditioning condensation, springs, non-commercial washing of vehicles, natural ripa wetland ows, dechlorinated swimming pools and any other water source not containing pollutant; Consists of dye testing as long as the city provided a verbal notication prior to the time of the test. No person shall use any illicit connection to intentionally convey non-stormwater to the city's storm sewer system. The construction, use, maintenance or continued existence of illicit connections to the storm sewer system is prohibited. This prohibition expressly includes, without limitation, illicit connections made in the past regardless of whether the connection was permissible under law or practices applicable or prevailing at the time of connection. A person is considered to be in violation of this ordinance if the person connects a line conveying sewage to the storm sewer system, or allows such a connection to continue. (Ord. No. 56 3rd series, § 2, 4-13-2009) Sec. 14-306. - General provisions. All owners or occupants of property shall comply with the following general requirements: No person shall leave, deposit, discharge, dump, or otherwise expose any chemical or septic waste in an area where discharge to streets or storm sewer system may occur. This section shall apply to both actual and potential discharges. Individual septic systems must be maintained to prevent failure, which has the potential to pollute surface water. Recreational vehicle sewage shall be disposed to a proper sanitary waste facility. Waste shall not be discharged in an area where drainage to streets or storm sewer systems may occur. For pools, water must be allowed to sit seven days without the addition of chlorine to allow for chlorine to evaporate before discharging in an area where drainage to streets or storm sewer systems may occur. Runo of water into the storm sewer system shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Runo of water into the storm sewer system from the washing down of paved areas is prohibited unless necessary for health or safety purposes. Mobile washing companies (carpet cleaning, mobile vehicle washing, etc) shall dispose of wastewater to the sanitary sewer. Wastewater must not be discharged where drainage to streets or storm sewer system may occur. Storage of materials, machinery and equipment must comply with the following requirements: Objects, such as motor vehicle parts containing grease, oil or other hazardous substances, and unsealed receptacles containing hazardous materials shall not be stored in areas susceptible to runo. Any machinery or equipment that is to be repaired or maintained in areas susceptible to runo shall be placed in a conned area to contain leaks, spills, or discharges. (5) a. b. (1) (a) Debris and residue shall be removed as follows: All motor vehicle parking lots and private streets shall be swept at least once a year in the spring to remove debris. Such debris shall be collected and properly disposed. Fuel and chemical residue or other types of potentially harmful material, such as animal waste, garbage or batteries shall be removed as soon as possible and disposed of properly. Household hazardous waste may be disposed of through the county collection program or at any other appropriate disposal site and shall not be placed in a trash container. (Ord. No. 56 3rd series, § 2, 4-13-2009) Sec. 14-307. - Industrial activity discharges. Any person subject to an industrial activity NPDES stormwater discharge permit shall comply with all provisions of such permit. Proof of compliance with said permit may be required in a form acceptable to the city prior to the allowing of discharges to the storm sewer system. All facilities that have stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity must adhere to the following provisions: Any person responsible for a property or premise, who is, or may be, the source of an illicit discharge, may be required to implement, at said person's expense, additional structural and non- structural BMPs to prevent the further discharge of pollutants to the storm sewer system. These BMPs shall be part of a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) as necessary for compliance with requirements of the NPDES permit. (Ord. No. 56 3rd series, § 2, 4-13-2009) Sec. 14-308. - Notication of spills. Notwithstanding other requirements of law, as soon as any person responsible for a facility or operation, or responsible for emergency response for a facility or operation has information of any known or suspected release of materials which are resulting or may result in illegal discharges or pollutants discharging into the storm sewer system, or water of the state said person shall take all necessary steps to ensure the discovery, containment, and cleanup of such release. In the event of such a release of hazardous materials, said person shall immediately notify emergency response agencies of the occurrence via emergency dispatch services. In the event of a release of non-hazardous materials, said person shall notify the city no later than the next business day. (Ord. No. 56 3rd series, § 2, 4-13-2009) Sec. 14-309. - Suspension of storm sewer system access. Suspension due to illicit discharges in emergency situation. The city may, without prior notice, suspend MS4 discharge access to a person when such suspension is necessary to stop an actual or threatened discharge that presents or may present imminent and substantial danger to the environment, to the heath or welfare of persons, to the storm sewer or waters of the state. If the violator fails to comply with (b) (a) (1) (2) (3) a suspension order issued in an emergency, the city may take such steps as deemed necessary to prevent or minimize damage to the storm sewer system or the waters of the state, or to minimize danger to persons. Suspension due to the detection of illicit discharge. All persons discharging to the MS4 in violation of this ordinance may have their access terminated if such termination serves to abate or reduce an illicit discharge. It is a violation of this ordinance to reinstate access to premises that have been terminated pursuant to this section without the prior approval of the city. (Ord. No. 56 3rd series, § 2, 4-13-2009) Sec. 14-310. - Enforcement. Notice of violation. A violation of this subdivision is a public nuisance. When the city nds that a person has violated a prohibition or failed to meet a requirement of this section, the person is deemed to have created a public nuisance subject to abatement and assessment, as provided in city Code section 70-5. In addition to any order issued pursuant to city Code section 70-5, the city may require the following: The performance of monitoring, analysis, and reporting; The implementation of source control or treatment BMPs; and Any other requirement deemed necessary. (Ord. No. 56 3rd series, § 2, 4-13-2009) www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 1 of 16 MS4 SWPPP Application for Reauthorization for the NPDES/SDS General Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit MNR040000 reissued with an effective date of August 1, 2013 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) Document Doc Type: Permit Application Instructions: This application is for authorization to discharge stormwater associated with Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System (NPDES/SDS) Permit Program. No fee is required with the submittal of this application. Please refer to “Example” for detailed instructions found on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) MS4 website at http://www.pca.state.mn.us/ms4. Submittal: This MS4 SWPPP Application for Reauthorization form must be submitted electronically via e-mail to the MPCA at ms4permitprogram.pca@state.mn.us from the person that is duly authorized to certify this form. All questions with an asterisk (*) are required fields. All applications will be returned if required fields are not completed. Questions: Contact Claudia Hochstein at 651-757-2881 or claudia.hochstein@state.mn.us, Dan Miller at 651-757-2246 or daniel.miller@state.mn.us, or call toll-free at 800-657-3864. General Contact Information (*Required fields) MS4 Owner (with ownership or operational responsibility, or control of the MS4) *MS4 permittee name: City of Orono *County: Hennepin (city, county, municipality, government agency or other entity) *Mailing address: 2750 Kelley Parkway *City: Orono *State: MN *Zip code: 55356 *Phone (including area code): (952) 249-4661 *E-mail: jstruve@ci.orono.mn.us MS4 General contact (with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program [SWPPP] implementation responsibility) *Last name: Struve *First name: Jesse (department head, MS4 coordinator, consultant, etc.) *Title: Director of Public Works/City Engineer *Mailing address: 2750 Kelley Parkway *City: Orono *State: MN *Zip code: 55356 *Phone (including area code): (952) 249-4661 *E-mail: jstruve@ci.orono.mn.us Preparer information (complete if SWPPP application is prepared by a party other than MS4 General contact) Last name: Bean First name: Robert (department head, MS4 coordinator, consultant, etc.) Title: Water Resources Engineer Mailing address: 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 City: Chaska State: MN Zip code: 55318 Phone (including area code): (612) 756-3184 E-mail: bobbe@bolton-menk.com Verification 1. I seek to continue discharging stormwater associated with a small MS4 after the effective date of this Permit, and shall submit this MS4 SWPPP Application for Reauthorization form, in accordance with the schedule in Appendix A, Table 1, with the SWPPP document completed in accordance with the Permit (Part II.D.). Yes 2. I have read and understand the NPDES/SDS MS4 General Permit and certify that we intend to comply with all requirements of the Permit. Yes www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 2 of 16 Certification (All fields are required) Yes - I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I certify that based on my inquiry of the person, or persons, who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of civil and criminal penalties. This certification is required by Minn. Stat. §§ 7001.0070 and 7001.0540. The authorized person with overall, MS4 legal responsibility must certify the application (principal executive officer or a ranking elected official). By typing my name in the following box, I certify the above statements to be true and correct, to the best of my knowledge, and that this information can be used for the purpose of processing my application. Name: Jesse Struve (This document has been electronically signed) Title: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Date (mm/dd/yyyy): 11/25/13 Mailing address: 2750 Kelley Parkway City: Orono State: MN Zip code: 55356 Phone (including area code): (952) 249-4661 E-mail: jstruve@ci.orono.mn.us Note: The application will not be processed without certification. www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 3 of 16 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program Document I. Partnerships: (Part II.D.1) A. List the regulated small MS4(s) with which you have established a partnership in order to satisfy one or more requirements of this Permit. Indicate which Minimum Control Measure (MCM) requirements or other program components that each partnership helps to accomplish (List all that apply). Check the box below if you currently have no established partnerships with other regulated MS4s. If you have more than five partnerships, hit the tab key after the last line to generate a new row. No partnerships with regulated small MS4s Name and description of partnership MCM/Other permit requirements involved Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Provides review, regulation, and inspection for Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control and Post- construction Stormwater Management. Partner to provide educational materials and engage public with various programs. Partner to inspect for illicit discharges. MCM 1-5 B. If you have additional information that you would like to communicate about your partnerships with other regulated small MS4(s), provide it in the space below, or include an attachment to the SWPPP Document, with the following file naming convention: MS4NameHere_Partnerships. II. Description of Regulatory Mechanisms: (Part II.D.2) Illicit discharges A. Do you have a regulatory mechanism(s) that effectively prohibits non-stormwater discharges into your small MS4, except those non-stormwater discharges authorized under the Permit (Part III.D.3.b.)? Yes No 1. If yes: a. Check which type of regulatory mechanism(s) your organization has (check all that apply): Ordinance Contract language Policy/Standards Permits Rules Other, explain: b. Provide either a direct link to the mechanism selected above or attach it as an electronic document to this form; or if your regulatory mechanism is either an Ordinance or a Rule, you may provide a citation: Citation: Orono, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances>>Title II - UTILITIES>>Chapter 14 - UTILITIES>>ARTICLE III. - CITY UTILITIES>>DIVISION 5. - STORM SEWER SYSTEM>>Subdivision V. Stormwater Illicit Discharge and Illicit Connection (Ord. No. 56 3rd series, § 2, 4-13-2009) Sec. 14-301 - 310 Direct link: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=13094&stateId=23&stateName=Minnesota www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 4 of 16 Check here if attaching an electronic copy of your regulatory mechanism, with the following file naming convention: MS4NameHere_IDDEreg. 2. If no: Describe the tasks and corresponding schedules that will be taken to assure that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, this permit requirement is met: Construction site stormwater runoff control A. Do you have a regulatory mechanism(s) that establishes requirements for erosion and sediment controls and waste controls? Yes No 1. If yes: a. Check which type of regulatory mechanism(s) your organization has (check all that apply): Ordinance Contract language Policy/Standards Permits Rules Other, explain: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District - Erosion Control Rule b. Provide either a direct link to the mechanism selected above or attach it as an electronic document to this form; or if your regulatory mechanism is either an Ordinance or a Rule, you may provide a citation: Citation: City: Orono, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances>>Title VI - LAND USE>>Chapter 79 CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF CONTROL (Ord. No. 55 3rd series, § 1, 4-13-2009; Ord. No. 69 3rd series, § 1, 4-12-2010) Sec 79-1 - 14 MCWD: Erosion Control Rule Direct link: City: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=13094&stateId=23&stateName=Minnesota MCWD: http://www.minnehahacreek.org/sites/minnehahacreek.org/files/pdfs/regulatory/Erosion%20Control%20Rule.pdf Check here if attaching an electronic copy of your regulatory mechanism, with the following file naming convention: MS4NameHere_CSWreg. B. Is your regulatory mechanism at least as stringent as the MPCA general permit to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity (as of the effective date of the MS4 Permit)? Yes No If you answered yes to the above question, proceed to C. If you answered no to either of the above permit requirements listed in A. or B., describe the tasks and corresponding schedules that will be taken to assure that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, these permit requirements are met: Within 12 months from the date permit coverage is extended, the City will revise its ordinances to state that applicants will have to meet the requirements of MCWD's Erosion Control Rule. C. Answer yes or no to indicate whether your regulatory mechanism(s) requires owners and operators of construction activity to develop site plans that incorporate the following erosion and sediment controls and waste controls as described in the Permit (Part III.D.4.a.(1)-(8)), and as listed below: 1. Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize erosion. Yes No 2. BMPs to minimize the discharge of sediment and other pollutants. Yes No 3. BMPs for dewatering activities. Yes No 4. Site inspections and records of rainfall events Yes No 5. BMP maintenance Yes No 6. Management of solid and hazardous wastes on each project site. Yes No 7. Final stabilization upon the completion of construction activity, including the use of perennial vegetative cover on all exposed soils or other equivalent means. Yes No 8. Criteria for the use of temporary sediment basins. Yes No www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 5 of 16 If you answered no to any of the above permit requirements, describe the tasks and corresponding schedules that will be taken to assure that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, these permit requirements are met: Post-construction stormwater management A. Do you have a regulatory mechanism(s) to address post-construction stormwater management activities? Yes No 1. If yes: a. Check which type of regulatory mechanism(s) your organization has (check all that apply): Ordinance Contract language Policy/Standards Permits Rules Other, explain: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District - Stormwater Management Rule b. Provide either a direct link to the mechanism selected above or attach it as an electronic document to this form; or if your regulatory mechanism is either an Ordinance or a Rule, you may provide a citation: Citation: MCWD: Stormwater Management Rule Direct link: http://www.minnehahacreek.org/sites/minnehahacreek.org/files/pdfs/regulatory/Stormwater%20Management%20Rule.pdf Check here if attaching an electronic copy of your regulatory mechanism, with the following file naming convention: MS4NameHere_PostCSWreg. B. Answer yes or no below to indicate whether you have a regulatory mechanism(s) in place that meets the following requirements as described in the Permit (Part III.D.5.a.): 1. Site plan review: Requirements that owners and/or operators of construction activity submit site plans with post-construction stormwater management BMPs to the permittee for review and approval, prior to start of construction activity. Yes No 2. Conditions for post construction stormwater management: Requires the use of any combination of BMPs, with highest preference given to Green Infrastructure techniques and practices (e.g., infiltration, evapotranspiration, reuse/harvesting, conservation design, urban forestry, green roofs, etc.), necessary to meet the following conditions on the site of a construction activity to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP): a. For new development projects – no net increase from pre-project conditions (on an annual average basis) of: 1) Stormwater discharge volume, unless precluded by the stormwater management limitations in the Permit (Part III.D.5.a(3)(a)). 2) Stormwater discharges of Total Suspended Solids (TSS). 3) Stormwater discharges of Total Phosphorus (TP). Yes No b. For redevelopment projects – a net reduction from pre-project conditions (on an annual average basis) of: 1) Stormwater discharge volume, unless precluded by the stormwater management limitations in the Permit (Part III.D.5.a(3)(a)). 2) Stormwater discharges of TSS. 3) Stormwater discharges of TP. Yes No 3. Stormwater management limitations and exceptions: a. Limitations 1) Prohibit the use of infiltration techniques to achieve the conditions for post-construction stormwater management in the Permit (Part III.D.5.a(2)) when the infiltration structural stormwater BMP will receive discharges from, or be constructed in areas: a) Where industrial facilities are not authorized to infiltrate industrial stormwater under an NPDES/SDS Industrial Stormwater Permit issued by the MPCA. b) Where vehicle fueling and maintenance occur. c) With less than three (3) feet of separation distance from the bottom of the infiltration system to the elevation of the seasonally saturated soils or the top of bedrock. d) Where high levels of contaminants in soil or groundwater will be mobilized by the infiltrating stormwater. Yes No www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 6 of 16 2) Restrict the use of infiltration techniques to achieve the conditions for post-construction stormwater management in the Permit (Part III.D.5.a(2)), without higher engineering review, sufficient to provide a functioning treatment system and prevent adverse impacts to groundwater, when the infiltration device will be constructed in areas: a) With predominately Hydrologic Soil Group D (clay) soils. b) Within 1,000 feet up-gradient, or 100 feet down-gradient of active karst features. c) Within a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) as defined in Minn. R. 4720.5100, subp. 13. d) Where soil infiltration rates are more than 8.3 inches per hour. Yes No 3) For linear projects where the lack of right-of-way precludes the installation of volume control practices that meet the conditions for post-construction stormwater management in the Permit (Part III.D.5.a(2)), the permittee’s regulatory mechanism(s) may allow exceptions as described in the Permit (Part III.D.5.a(3)(b)). The permittee’s regulatory mechanism(s) shall ensure that a reasonable attempt be made to obtain right-of-way during the project planning process. Yes No 4. Mitigation provisions: The permittee’s regulatory mechanism(s) shall ensure that any stormwater discharges of TSS and/or TP not addressed on the site of the original construction activity are addressed through mitigation and, at a minimum, shall ensure the following requirements are met: a. Mitigation project areas are selected in the following order of preference: 1) Locations that yield benefits to the same receiving water that receives runoff from the original construction activity. 2) Locations within the same Minnesota Department of Natural Resource (DNR) catchment area as the original construction activity. 3) Locations in the next adjacent DNR catchment area up‐stream 4) Locations anywhere within the permittee’s jurisdiction. Yes No b. Mitigation projects must involve the creation of new structural stormwater BMPs or the retrofit of existing structural stormwater BMPs, or the use of a properly designed regional structural stormwater BMP. Yes No c. Routine maintenance of structural stormwater BMPs already required by this permit cannot be used to meet mitigation requirements of this part. Yes No d. Mitigation projects shall be completed within 24 months after the start of the original construction activity. e. The permittee shall determine, and document, who will be responsible for long-term maintenance on all mitigation projects of this part. f. If the permittee receives payment from the owner and/or operator of a construction activity for mitigation purposes in lieu of the owner or operator of that construction activity meeting the conditions for post-construction stormwater management in Part III.D.5.a(2), the permittee shall apply any such payment received to a public stormwater project, and all projects must be in compliance with Part III.D.5.a(4)(a)-(e). Yes No Yes No Yes No 5. Long-term maintenance of structural stormwater BMPs: The permittee’s regulatory mechanism(s) shall provide for the establishment of legal mechanisms between the permittee and owners or operators responsible for the long-term maintenance of structural stormwater BMPs not owned or operated by the permittee, that have been implemented to meet the conditions for post-construction stormwater management in the Permit (Part III.D.5.a(2)). This only includes structural stormwater BMPs constructed after the effective date of this permit and that are directly connected to the permittee’s MS4, and that are in the permittee’s jurisdiction. The legal mechanism shall include provisions that, at a minimum: a. Allow the permittee to conduct inspections of structural stormwater BMPs not owned or operated by the permittee, perform necessary maintenance, and assess costs for those structural stormwater BMPs when the permittee determines that the owner and/or operator of that structural stormwater BMP has not conducted maintenance. Yes No b. Include conditions that are designed to preserve the permittee’s right to ensure maintenance responsibility, for structural stormwater BMPs not owned or operated by the permittee, when those responsibilities are legally transferred to another party. Yes No c. Include conditions that are designed to protect/preserve structural stormwater BMPs and site features that are implemented to comply with the Permit (Part III.D.5.a(2)). If site configurations or structural stormwater BMPs change, causing decreased structural stormwater BMP effectiveness, new or improved structural stormwater BMPs must be implemented to ensure the conditions for post-construction stormwater management in the Permit (Part III.D.5.a(2)) continue to be met. Yes No www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 7 of 16 If you answered no to any of the above permit requirements, describe the tasks and corresponding schedules that will be taken to assure that, within twelve (12) months of the date permit coverage is extended, these permit requirements are met: Within 12 months from the date permit coverage is extended, the City will revise its ordinances to state that applicants will have to meet the requirements of MCWD's Stormwater Management Rule. III. Enforcement Response Procedures (ERPs): (Part II.D.3) A. Do you have existing ERPs that satisfy the requirements of the Permit (Part III.B.)? Yes No 1. If yes, attach them to this form as an electronic document, with the following file naming convention: MS4NameHere_ERPs. 2. If no, describe the tasks and corresponding schedules that will be taken to assure that, with twelve (12) months of the date permit coverage is extended, these permit requirements are met: Within 12 months from the date permit coverage is extended, Orono will develop written procedures that will satisfy these requirements. B. Describe your ERPs: IV. Storm Sewer System Map and Inventory: (Part II.D.4.) A. Describe how you manage your storm sewer system map and inventory: The storm sewer map was initially completed in 2008 and is updated annually as development occurs. B. Answer yes or no to indicate whether your storm sewer system map addresses the following requirements from the Permit (Part III.C.1.a-d), as listed below: 1. The permittee’s entire small MS4 as a goal, but at a minimum, all pipes 12 inches or greater in diameter, including stormwater flow direction in those pipes. Yes No 2. Outfalls, including a unique identification (ID) number assigned by the permittee, and an associated geographic coordinate. Yes No 3. Structural stormwater BMPs that are part of the permittee’s small MS4. Yes No 4. All receiving waters. Yes No If you answered no to any of the above permit requirements, describe the tasks and corresponding schedules that will be taken to assure that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, these permit requirements are met: C. Answer yes or no to indicate whether you have completed the requirements of 2009 Minnesota Session Law, Ch. 172. Sec. 28: with the following inventories, according to the specifications of the Permit (Part III.C.2.a.-b.), including: 1. All ponds within the permittee’s jurisdiction that are constructed and operated for purposes of water quality treatment, stormwater detention, and flood control, and that are used for the collection of stormwater via constructed conveyances. Yes No 2. All wetlands and lakes, within the permittee’s jurisdiction, that collect stormwater via constructed conveyances. Yes No D. Answer yes or no to indicate whether you have completed the following information for each feature inventoried. 1. A unique identification (ID) number assigned by the permittee. 2. A geographic coordinate. 3. Type of feature (e.g., pond, wetland, or lake). This may be determined by using best professional judgment. Yes No Yes No Yes No If you have answered yes to all above requirements, and you have already submitted the Pond Inventory Form to the MPCA, then you do not need to resubmit the inventory form below. If you answered no to any of the above permit requirements, describe the tasks and corresponding schedules that will be taken to assure that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, these permit requirements are met: E. Answer yes or no to indicate if you are attaching your pond, wetland and lake inventory to the MPCA Yes No www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 8 of 16 on the form provided on the MPCA website at: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/ms4 , according to the specifications of Permit (Part III.C.2.b.(1)-(3)). Attach with the following file naming convention: MS4NameHere_inventory. If you answered no, the inventory form must be submitted to the MPCA MS4 Permit Program within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended. V. Minimum Control Measures (MCMs) (Part II.D.5) A. MCM1: Public education and outreach 1. The Permit requires that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, existing permittees revise their education and outreach program that focuses on illicit discharge recognition and reporting, as well as other specifically selected stormwater-related issue(s) of high priority to the permittee during this permit term. Describe your current educational program, including any high-priority topics included: Orono is primarily residential, and therefore, the focus for education is mostly on residential issues. However, no specific high-priority topics have been identified. An annual contribution is made to the Metro Watershed Partner's "Let's Keep It Clean" campaign to provide education throughout the metro area. Stormwater articles are included in the City newsletter, which is distributed in the Spring and Fall. A presentation is given to the City Council annually explaining the specific components of the SWPPP, and a stormwater web page is maintained to provide the public with information regarding stormwater management, pollution prevention, and additional resources. 2. List the categories of BMPs that address your public education and outreach program, including the distribution of educational materials and a program implementation plan. Use the first table for categories of BMPs that you have established and the second table for categories of BMPs that you plan to implement over the course of the permit term. Include the measurable goals with appropriate timeframes that each BMP category will be implemented and completed. In addition, provide interim milestones and the frequency of action in which the permittee will implement and/or maintain the BMPs. Refer to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Measurable Goals Guidance for Phase II Small MS4s (http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/measurablegoals.pdf). If you have more than five categories, hit the tab key after the last line to generate a new row. Established BMP categories Measurable goals and timeframes Stormwater Articles in City Newsletter Circulate a newsletter that includes stormwater articles in the Spring and Fall to approximately 3,174 households and businesses. – twice/year Presentation to City Council Present to City Council on components of SWPPP to increase Council awareness of stormwater runoff issues. – annually Stormwater Education on City Website Maintain Stormwater Information page with information regarding stormwater management, pollution prevention, and additional resources. Also provide links to current SWPPP, MS4 permit, and application for public viewing. Website link is: http://www.ci.orono.mn.us/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={1919DEF8- B348-40E9-B83C-86BF7287321A}. – as necessary Annual Cleanup Day Host clean up day at public works facility in which residents can drop off appliances, household cleaners, scrap metal, tires, and electronic items. Materials are either recycled or disposed of in an appropriate manner, which reduces the amount of potential material that is illicitly discharged. – annually in Spring Bi-annual Leaf and Grass Disposal Program Host cleanup program at public works facility in which residents can drop of leaf and grass material. This material is then composted by the City and provided to residents at no cost. This program reduces the amount of potential material that is illicitly discharged. - annually Erosion Control Management Training Train all City staff on proper application, installation, operation, and maintenance of erosion control devices. – annually BMP categories to be implemented Measurable goals and timeframes Social Media Post messages or provide links regarding stormwater management and pollution prevention on Facebook and Twitter. – within 12 months of permit coverage being extended Program Evaluation Review Education Program for effectiveness and future needs. - annually www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 9 of 16 3. Provide the name or the position title of the individual(s) who is responsible for implementing and/or coordinating this MCM: Jesse Struve - Director of Public Works/City Engineer B. MCM2: Public participation and involvement 1. The Permit (Part III.D.2.a.) requires that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, existing permittees shall revise their current program, as necessary, and continue to implement a public participation/involvement program to solicit public input on the SWPPP. Describe your current program: Every year, the City presents and hears comments on the SWPPP at a regular City Council meeting. This is typically done at a meeting in the Spring, and a notice is provided to the public on the City's website and at City Hall. 2. List the categories of BMPs that address your public participation/involvement program, including solicitation and documentation of public input on the SWPPP. Use the first table for categories of BMPs that you have established and the second table for categories of BMPs that you plan to implement over the course of the permit term. Include the measurable goals with appropriate timeframes that each BMP category will be implemented and completed. In addition, provide interim milestones and the frequency of action in which the permittee will implement and/or maintain the BMPs. Refer to the EPA’s Measurable Goals Guidance for Phase II Small MS4s (http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/measurablegoals.pdf). If you have more than five categories, hit the tab key after the last line to generate a new row. Established BMP categories Measurable goals and timeframes Appropriate Public Notice Provide a notice of 30 days for the annual public meeting to present accomplishments and discuss the SWPPP. The meeting will run concurrently with a City Council meeting. Notice will be posted in local newspapers, the City website, and at City Hall. - annually Solicit Public Input Accept correspondence to report illicit discharges, provide comments regarding the SWPPP, and report construction site runoff violations. All comments received are documented and then routed to appropriate staff. – continuously Annual Meeting Host annual meeting to run concurrently with City Council meeting to present accomplishments and discuss the SWPPP. - annually Online Availability of SWPPP Document Provide a PDF of the current SWPPP on the City’s Stormwater Information page. - update annually. BMP categories to be implemented Measurable goals and timeframes 3. Do you have a process for receiving and documenting citizen input? Yes No If you answered no to the above permit requirement, describe the tasks and corresponding schedules that will be taken to assure that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, this permit requirement is met: 4. Provide the name or the position title of the individual(s) who is responsible for implementing and/or coordinating this MCM: Jesse Struve - Director of Public Works/City Engineer C. MCM 3: Illicit discharge detection and elimination www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 10 of 16 1. The Permit (Part III.D.3.) requires that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, existing permittees revise their current program as necessary, and continue to implement and enforce a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges into the small MS4. Describe your current program: An Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination ordinance was passed during the last permit cycle that prohibits illicit discharges and connections. A Storm Sewer Map has been created that shows the locations of all storm catchbasins, manholes, pipes over 12", structural treatment devices, ponds, and outfalls within the City. 2. Does your Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program meet the following requirements, as found in the Permit (Part III.D.3.c.-g.)? a. Incorporation of illicit discharge detection into all inspection and maintenance activities conducted under the Permit (Part III.D.6.e.-f.)Where feasible, illicit discharge inspections shall be conducted during dry-weather conditions (e.g., periods of 72 or more hours of no precipitation). Yes No b. Detecting and tracking the source of illicit discharges using visual inspections. The permittee may also include use of mobile cameras, collecting and analyzing water samples, and/or other detailed procedures that may be effective investigative tools. Yes No c. Training of all field staff, in accordance with the requirements of the Permit (Part III.D.6.g.(2)), in illicit discharge recognition (including conditions which could cause illicit discharges), and reporting illicit discharges for further investigation. Yes No d. Identification of priority areas likely to have illicit discharges, including at a minimum, evaluating land use associated with business/industrial activities, areas where illicit discharges have been identified in the past, and areas with storage of large quantities of significant materials that could result in an illicit discharge. Yes No e. Procedures for the timely response to known, suspected, and reported illicit discharges. Yes No f. Procedures for investigating, locating, and eliminating the source of illicit discharges. Yes No g. Procedures for responding to spills, including emergency response procedures to prevent spills from entering the small MS4. The procedures shall also include the immediate notification of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety Duty Officer, if the source of the illicit discharge is a spill or leak as defined in Minn. Stat. § 115.061. Yes No h. When the source of the illicit discharge is found, the permittee shall use the ERPs required by the Permit (Part III.B.) to eliminate the illicit discharge and require any needed corrective action(s). Yes No If you answered no to any of the above permit requirements, describe the tasks and corresponding schedules that will be taken to assure that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, these permit requirements are met: The training program for all City staff will be updated, if necessary, regarding IDDE, and staff is currently directed to inspect for illicit discharges during all normal work activities. High potential areas for IDDE will be identified and added to the City's Storm Sewer Map. Procedures for response, investigating, locating, and eliminating illicit discharges will be developed. All required tasks will be completed within 12 months of permit coverage being extended. 3. List the categories of BMPs that address your illicit discharge, detection and elimination program. Use the first table for categories of BMPs that you have established and the second table for categories of BMPs that you plan to implement over the course of the permit term. Include the measurable goals with appropriate timeframes that each BMP category will be implemented and completed. In addition, provide interim milestones and the frequency of action in which the permittee will implement and/or maintain the BMPs. Refer to the EPA’s Measurable Goals Guidance for Phase II Small MS4s (http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/measurablegoals.pdf). If you have more than five categories, hit the tab key after the last line to generate a new row. Established BMP categories Measurable goals and timeframes Regulatory Control Program Review and revise ordinance to ensure that it continues to meet the needs of the City and legal requirements. - annually Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Plan Public Works personnel inspect for illicit discharges and connections while performing all duties. Site specific inspections are also performed when reports are received from the general public. All discharges are documented and handled per City code. – continuously Illicit Septic System Discharge and Elimination Plan Designated staff inspects existing septic systems and reviews plans and inspects construction of new septic systems. Staff also sends notices to system owners regarding maintenance. Pumping companies must submit pumping records to City. – continuously Public and Employee IDDE Information Program Provide education to City staff, businesses, and the public regarding IDDE through the “Let’s Keep It Clean” campaign, Stormwater articles in the City newsletter, Presentation to City www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 11 of 16 Council, Stormwater Information webpage, and a Public Works Training Program Storm System Map Maintain map and update with changes to City’s storm sewer, structural BMPs, ponds, and outfalls. – annually Training Provide training for City staff. – annually BMP categories to be implemented Measurable goals and timeframes Inspections Public Works personnel will perform monthly inspections of high-priority outfalls, and around high potential land uses (fast food restaurants, dumpsters, car washes, mechanics, and oil changers). Information from previous inspections will be used to determine further high potential outfalls. Inspections will be performed in dry-weather as much as possible. - monthly Storm System Map Add high-priority outfalls and high potential land uses for illicit discharge inspection to the City’s storm system map. – within 12 months of permit coverage being extended Training Update training program for all City staff regarding IDDE, if necessary, due to new permit requirements and MCWD rules. – within 12 months of permit coverage being extended 4. Do you have procedures for record-keeping within your Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) program as specified within the Permit (Part III.D.3.h.)? Yes No If you answered no, indicate how you will develop procedures for record-keeping of your Illicit Discharge, Detection and Elimination Program, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended: 5. Provide the name or the position title of the individual(s) who is responsible for implementing and/or coordinating this MCM: Jesse Struve - Director of Public Works/City Engineer D. MCM 4: Construction site stormwater runoff control 1. The Permit (Part III.D.4) requires that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, existing permittees shall revise their current program, as necessary, and continue to implement and enforce a construction site stormwater runoff control program. Describe your current program: The City's ordinances requires a permit application for any land disturbing activity that results in: 1) a land disturbance greater than or equal to one acre, 2) grading, excavation, or fill greater than or equal to 10 cy in the shore setback zone, or 3) grading, excavation, or fill greater than or equal to 25 cy. Review of construction site stormwater pollution prevention plans are performed prior to any land disturbance and appropriate selection and use of BMPs are coordinated with Owners and Contractors. The City also relies on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) for review and directs all applicants to work with MCWD for district approvals. A copy of MCWD approval for any required permitting must be submitted to the City prior to any land disturbance. In addition to review, the City relies on MCWD for inspections of construction sites and enforcement of erosion and sediment control violations. 2. Does your program address the following BMPs for construction stormwater erosion and sediment control as required in the Permit (Part III.D.4.b.): a. Have you established written procedures for site plan reviews that you conduct prior to the start of construction activity? Yes No b. Does the site plan review procedure include notification to owners and operators proposing construction activity that they need to apply for and obtain coverage under the MPCA’s general permit to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity No. MN R100001? Yes No c. Does your program include written procedures for receipt and consideration of reports of noncompliance or other stormwater related information on construction activity submitted by the public to the permittee? Yes No d. Have you included written procedures for the following aspects of site inspections to determine compliance with your regulatory mechanism(s): 1) Does your program include procedures for identifying priority sites for inspection? Yes No 2) Does your program identify a frequency at which you will conduct construction site inspections? Yes No 3) Does your program identify the names of individual(s) or position titles of those responsible for conducting construction site inspections? Yes No www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 12 of 16 4) Does your program include a checklist or other written means to document construction site inspections when determining compliance? Yes No e. Does your program document and retain construction project name, location, total acreage to be disturbed, and owner/operator information? Yes No f. Does your program document stormwater-related comments and/or supporting information used to determine project approval or denial? Yes No g. Does your program retain construction site inspection checklists or other written materials used to document site inspections? Yes No If you answered no to any of the above permit requirements, describe the tasks and corresponding schedules that will be taken to assure that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, these permit requirements are met. 3. List the categories of BMPs that address your construction site stormwater runoff control program. Use the first table for categories of BMPs that you have established and the second table for categories of BMPs that you plan to implement over the course of the permit term. Include the measurable goals with appropriate timeframes that each BMP category will be implemented and completed. In addition, provide interim milestones and the frequency of action in which the permittee will implement and/or maintain the BMPs. Refer to the EPA’s Measurable Goals Guidance for Phase II Small MS4s (http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/measurablegoals.pdf). If you have more than five categories, hit the tab key after the last line to generate a new row. Established BMP categories Measurable goals and timeframes Ordinance and other Regulatory Program Rely on City code and MCWD regulatory requirements for plan review and approvals. Rely on MCWD for inspection of construction sites and enforcement of erosion and sediment control violations. – continuously BMP categories to be implemented Measurable goals and timeframes 4. Provide the name or the position title of the individual(s) who is responsible for implementing and/or coordinating this MCM: Jesse Struve - Director of Public Works/City Engineer E. MCM 5: Post-construction stormwater management 1. The Permit (Part III.D.5.) requires that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, existing permittees shall revise their current program, as necessary, and continue to implement and enforce a post-construction stormwater management program. Describe your current program: Orono relies on Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) for regulatory requirements regarding post-construction stormwater management. Applicants to the City for building, land disturbance, subdivision, and/or site plan review permits are directed to work with MCWD for district approvals. A copy of MCWD approvals and maintenance agreements for any required stormwater management facilities must be submitted to the City prior to any land disturbance. The City also reviews stormwater management plans to ensure any structural facilities fit City needs and vision. 2. Have you established written procedures for site plan reviews that you will conduct prior to the start of construction activity? Yes No 3. Answer yes or no to indicate whether you have the following listed procedures for documentation of post-construction stormwater management according to the specifications of Permit (Part III.D.5.c.): a. Any supporting documentation that you use to determine compliance with the Permit (Part III.D.5.a), including the project name, location, owner and operator of the construction activity, any checklists used for conducting site plan reviews, and any calculations used to determine Yes No www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 13 of 16 compliance? b. All supporting documentation associated with mitigation projects that you authorize? Yes No c. Payments received and used in accordance with Permit (Part III.D.5.a.(4)(f))? Yes No d. All legal mechanisms drafted in accordance with the Permit (Part III.D.5.a.(5)), including date(s) of the agreement(s) and names of all responsible parties involved? Yes No If you answered no to any of the above permit requirements, describe the steps that will be taken to assure that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, these permit requirements are met. 4. List the categories of BMPs that address your post-construction stormwater management program. Use the first table for categories of BMPs that you have established and the second table for categories of BMPs that you plan to implement over the course of the permit term. Include the measurable goals with appropriate timeframes that each BMP category will be implemented and completed. In addition, provide interim milestones and the frequency of action in which the permittee will implement and/or maintain the BMPs. Refer to the EPA’s Measurable Goals Guidance for Phase II Small MS4s (http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/measurablegoals.pdf). If you have more than five categories, hit the tab key after the last line to generate a new row. Established BMP categories Measurable goals and timeframes Regulatory Program Rely on MCWD to review and approve post-construction stormwater management plans for required projects. Review stormwater management plans regarding City needs and vision. – continuously Long Term Operation and Maintenance Operate and maintain publicly owned stormwater management facilities in accordance with permit requirements. Rely on MCWD for Maintenance Agreements requiring property owners/Homeowners Associations to maintain structural facilities. Inspect all facilities in the next five years. – continuously BMP categories to be implemented Measurable goals and timeframes 5. Provide the name or the position title of the individual(s) who is responsible for implementing and/or coordinating this MCM: Jesse Struve - Director of Public Works/City Engineer F. MCM 6: Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations 1. The Permit (Part III.D.6.) requires that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, existing permittees shall revise their current program, as necessary, and continue to implement an operations and maintenance program that prevents or reduces the discharge of pollutants from the permittee owned/operated facilities and operations to the small MS4. Describe your current program: Orono inspects its structural pollution control devices on an annual basis and inspects all ponds and outfalls at least once every five years. Public Works personnel inspect City stockpiles and storage and material handling areas for potential discharges and maintain publically owned BMPs. City streets are swept annually in the spring to remove leaf litter and residuals from salting streets during winter. 2. Do you have a facilities inventory as outlined in the Permit (Part III.D.6.a.)? Yes No www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 14 of 16 3. If you answered no to the above permit requirement in question 2, describe the tasks and corresponding schedules that will be taken to assure that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, this permit requirement is met: A Faciltiy Inventory will be developed in accordance with pemit requirements within 12 months of permit coverage being extended. 4. List the categories of BMPs that address your pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations program. Use the first table for categories of BMPs that you have established and the second table for categories of BMPs that you plan to implement over the course of the permit term. Include the measurable goals with appropriate timeframes that each BMP category will be implemented and completed. In addition, provide interim milestones and the frequency of action in which the permittee will implement and/or maintain the BMPs. For an explanation of measurable goals, refer to the EPA’s Measurable Goals Guidance for Phase II Small MS4s (http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/measurablegoals.pdf). If you have more than five categories, hit the tab key after the last line to generate a new row. Established BMP categories Measurable goals and timeframes Public Works Training Program Provide training for Public Works personnel regarding fleet and building maintenance, park and open space maintenance, storm water system maintenance, and construction and land disturbance inspection. – annually City Vehicle Maintenance Program Provide training for City staff regarding vehicle operation and maintenance. Operate vehicle maintenance program, which requires inspections and corrective actions. – continuously Storm Drain System Cleaning Vacuum storm drain sumps and other stormwater pollution control devices and remove debris from storm sewer lines and culverts. – annually Parking Lot and Street Sweeping Sweep streets to remove sediment and debris from paved surfaces and minimize amount of material received by storm drainage system. – biannually Sanitary Sewer System Operation and Maintenance Vacuum sanitary lift stations, manholes, and lines as necessary to negate the probability of sanitary sewer overflows and illicit discharges. Televise sanitary lines and repair as necessary to reduce infiltration and inflow. Train and license required Public Works personnel on sanitary system operation. – annually Municipal Golf Course Training Train Municipal Golf Course personnel on proper pesticide and fertilizer application. Responsible personnel are duly licensed to complete these activities. – annually Inspection Inspect all stormwater pollution control devices annually. Inspect all outfalls and ponds once every five years. Inspect all exposed stockpiles, storage, and material handling areas after all rain events of 1” or greater. BMP categories to be implemented Measurable goals and timeframes Facility Inventory Develop a Facility inventory of City-owned properties and buildings. – complete within 12 months of permit coverage extension and update annually Pond Assessment Procedures Develop procedures for determining TSS and TP treatment effectiveness of City-owned ponds used for stormwater treatment. – complete procedure development within 12 months of permit coverage extension and implement assessment of all ponds within the next five years. Inspection Utilize a checklist that documents findings and allows staff to compare to previous inspections. – continuously SWPPP Update Update SWPPP to include Enforcement Response Procedures (ERPs), IDDE High Potential Map, Facility Inventory, BMP Effectiveness Assessment Procedures, and any other revisions necessary to meet requirements of new permit. – complete within 12 months of permit coverage extension 5. Does discharge from your MS4 affect a Source Water Protection Area (Permit Part III.D.6.c.)? Yes No www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm4-49a • 5/31/13 Page 15 of 16 a. If no, continue to 6. b. If yes, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) is in the process of mapping the following items. Maps are available at http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/water/swp/maps/index.htm. Is a map including the following items available for your MS4: 1) Wells and source waters for drinking water supply management areas identified as vulnerable under Minn. R. 4720.5205, 4720.5210, and 4720.5330? Yes No 2) Source water protection areas for surface intakes identified in the source water assessments conducted by or for the Minnesota Department of Health under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, U.S.C. §§ 300j – 13? Yes No c. Have you developed and implemented BMPs to protect any of the above drinking water sources? Yes No 6. Have you developed procedures and a schedule for the purpose of determining the TSS and TP treatment effectiveness of all permittee owned/operated ponds constructed and used for the collection and treatment of stormwater, according to the Permit (Part III.D.6.d.)? Yes No 7. Do you have inspection procedures that meet the requirements of the Permit (Part III.D.6.e.(1)- (3)) for structural stormwater BMPs, ponds and outfalls, and stockpile, storage and material handling areas? Yes No 8. Have you developed and implemented a stormwater management training program commensurate with each employee’s job duties that: a. Addresses the importance of protecting water quality? Yes No b. Covers the requirements of the permit relevant to the duties of the employee? Yes No c. Includes a schedule that establishes initial training for new and/or seasonal employees and recurring training intervals for existing employees to address changes in procedures, practices, techniques, or requirements? Yes No 9. Do you keep documentation of inspections, maintenance, and training as required by the Permit (Part III.D.6.h.(1)-(5))? Yes No If you answered no to any of the above permit requirements listed in Questions 5 – 9, then describe the tasks and corresponding schedules that will be taken to assure that, within 12 months of the date permit coverage is extended, these permit requirements are met: Within 12 months of permit coverage being extended, Orono will develop procedures for determining TSS and TP removal effectiveness of stormwater treatment ponds and a schedule for implementation. 10. Provide the name or the position title of the individual(s) who is responsible for implementing and/or coordinating this MCM: Jesse Struve - Director of Public Works/City Engineer VI. Compliance Schedule for an Approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) with an Applicable Waste Load Allocation (WLA) (Part II.D.6.) A. Do you have an approved TMDL with a Waste Load Allocation (WLA) prior to the effective date of the Permit? Yes No 1. If no, continue to section VII. 2. If yes, fill out and attach the MS4 Permit TMDL Attachment Spreadsheet with the following naming convention: MS4NameHere_TMDL. This form is found on the MPCA MS4 website: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/ms4. VII. Alum or Ferric Chloride Phosphorus Treatment Systems (Part II.D.7.) A. Do you own and/or operate any Alum or Ferric Chloride Phosphorus Treatment Systems which are regulated by this Permit (Part III.F.)? Yes No 1. If no, this section requires no further information. 2. If yes, you own and/or operate an Alum or Ferric Chloride Phosphorus Treatment System within your small MS4, then you must submit the Alum or Ferric Chloride Phosphorus Treatment Systems Form supplement to this document, with the following naming convention: MS4NameHere_TreatmentSystem. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4C WATER SUPPLY Introduction 4C-2 Existing Facilities 4C-2 Table 4C-1 Well Construction Summary 4C-2 Table 4C-2 Existing Storage Facilities 4C-3 Land Use and Population 4C-4 Table 4C-3 Met Council Projections 4C-4 Water Use 4C-5 Table 4C-4 Historic Water Use 4C-5 Table 4C-5 Projected Water Demand - Navarre 4C-6 Table 4C-6 Projected Water Demand – Highway 12 4C-6 Water System Evaluation 4C-7 Table 4C-7 Projected Water Supply - Navarre 4C-8 Table 4C-8 Projected Water Supply – Highway 12 4C-8 Table 4C-9 Required Storage - Navarre 4C-10 Table 4C-10 Required Storage – Highway 12 4C-10 Table 4C-11 Required Storage based on High Day - Navarre 4C-11 Table 4C-12 Required Storage based on High Day - Navarre 4C-12 Table 4C-13 Recommended Fire Flows 4C-13 Proposed Water System Improvements 4C-16 WaterSystem Emergency Preparedness 4C-16 Table 4C-14 Additional Water Resources 4C-17 Conservation Plan 4C-21 Goals and Policies 4C-24 Future Water Systems 4C-25 Table 4C-15 Future Expansion Projects 4C-26 Table 4C-16 Future Sewer Maintenance Needed 4C-27 Appendices Appendix 4C-A. MnDNR Local Water Supply Template Submission Map 4C-1 Water Service Area Map 4C-2 Proposed Expansion Area Map 4C-3 Proposed Water Distribution Area CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 2 INTRODUCTION The City of Orono is required to update its water supply plan and submit to the DNR and the Metropolitan Council as part of the Comprehensive Plan update required of all metro area cities. This Chapter is intended to address that requirement. EXISTING FACILITIES General This Chapter provides a summary of the existing water supply, treatment, storage, and distribution facilities for the City of Orono. The City has four existing water systems: the Navarre Water System, the Highway 12 Water System, the Wayzata System Extension, and the Long Lake System Extension. The Navarre Water System is located in the southern portion of Orono. It consists of two municipal wells, a treatment facility, one elevated storage tank, and a water distribution system. The Highway 12 Water System is located in the northern portion of the City. It consists of two municipal wells, a small treatment facility including a chemical feed system, one elevated storage tank, and a water distribution system. The Wayzata System is located in the northeast portion of Orono. It consists of a distribution system that has its water supplied from the City of Wayzata. The Long Lake System Extension is a distribution system that has its water supplied from the City of Long Lake. More than 50 percent of the households in Orono receive their potable water from private individual wells. The distribution systems are comprised of watermains ranging in size from 6 to 16 inches in diameter. The existing water service area is shown in Map 4C-1. Water Supply The City’s water is currently provided by four existing water systems. The Navarre Water System is supplied by two wells, Well 1 and 2. The Highway 12 Water System is supplied by two wells, Wells 3 and 4. A summary of the specific well construction information is provided in Table 4C-1. Table 4C-1 Well Construction summary Navarre Well 1 Navarre Well 2 Highway 12 Well 3 Highway 12 Well 4 Unique Well No. 205,627 211,965 509,097 821,940 Year Constructed 1971 1971 1991 2017 Well Pump Capacity (gpm) 1,000 500 500 1,000 Casing Diameter (inches) 12 8 16 18 Casing Depth (feet) NA NA NA 365 Overall Well Depth (feet) 385 390 381 500 Total Well Capacity 1.8 MGD 1.6 MGD Firm Capacity 0.6 MGD 0.6 MGD CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 3 The total well capacity is determined as the total capacity of all wells operating for 20 hours per day. It is considered good practice to allow the well pumps a few hours of down time to “rest”, which ultimately extends the life of the pumps and allows for aquifer recharge. The firm capacity is the total capacity with the single largest pump out of service and is determined for a pumping period of 20 hours per day. Regulatory agencies recommend the firm capacity be equal to or greater than the average day demand it serves. Water Treatment Treatment of source water for the Navarre Water System consists of sand filtration for iron and manganese removal, ion exchange softening to reduce hardness, and chemical addition prior to entry into the distribution system. Fluoride is added for dental cavity protection, chlorine is added for disinfection, and polyphosphate is added as a corrosion inhibitor. Treatment of source water for the Highway 12 system consists of chemical addition of chlorine and fluoride; polyphosphate is added as a corrosion inhibitor. Water Storage The existing storage facilities in the City of Orono consist of one 200,000-gallon elevated water tower in the Navarre Water System and one 400,000-gallon elevated water tower in the Highway 12 Water System. Details of the water storage tower are presented in Table 4C-2. Table 4C-2: Existing Storage Facilities Navarre Water Tower Highway 12 Water Tower Capacity (gallons) 200,000 400,000 Year Constructed 1971 1993 High Water Level 1,102 1,165 Support Type Multi- legged Hydropillar Water Distribution System The Orono water system is comprised of water mains ranging in size from 6 inches to 16 inches in diameter. As previously discussed, both the Navarre and Highway 12 service areas include groundwater wells and elevated storage. The Wayzata System Extension and Long Lake System Extension are supplied with water directly from the other two Cities’ water systems and only provide a means of distribution to the customers. The existing capacities of the systems appear to be adequate in regards to pressure and available fire flow. Future improvements to provide service to planned expansion areas as well as increased supply capacities are discussed later in this report. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 4 Mains that are 10 inches and larger are considered trunk mains for this size of distribution system. When possible, all mains should be built in loops. A dead end main without enough connected demand will require frequent flushing to reduce water stagnation problems. This problem is especially true for trunk mains because of the larger volume of water stored. The existing system has several dead end pipe segments in cul-de-sacs and other areas that limit looping. Looping of water mains also helps provide for uninterrupted service to most of the system customers when one pipe segment is shut down for repairs. With a looped system only an isolated section of the system will be out of service instead of an entire neighborhood or commercial area. Looping also provides for substantial flow increases during a fire demand as the demand at the location of the fire can be met from more than one direction in the system. LAND USE AND POPULATION Land Use The water system planning area is based on providing service within the current City limits. Population Projection The Metropolitan Council’s “Thrive” forecasts are presented in Table 4C-3. The Metropolitan Council projects the City of Orono’s population to approach 9,000 in 2030. Table 4C-3: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 4,429 -- 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2,950 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9,500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 1,780 2,253 2,105 2,455 2,785 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 1046 784 1,095 1,105 1,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,037 3,200 3,560 3,900 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.53 2.47 2.44 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement As previously noted, approximately one-half of the existing population is served by private wells. A portion of the projected population growth will be served by the Orono water system. This increase in population served is likely the growth that will occur within and adjacent to the Highway 12 water system. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 5 WATER USAGE Existing Water Usage Historical water data is an important tool for determining trends and helping to assist the City in determining if there are problems within the system. Yearly and monthly pumping summaries from 2005 to 2015 are presented below in Table 4C-4 for the Water System. The yearly pumping totals reveal a slight decrease in recent water usage. MG – Million Gallons MGD – Million Gallons per Day GPCD – Gallons per Capita per Day Unaccounted for water was above 25 percent in 2007 and 2008. Since 2013, the unaccounted for water has been below 6 percent. Determining unaccounted for water is an important tool. The City monitors this parameter on a quarterly basis as well as conducting water audits and annual leak detection. Reducing the amount of unaccounted for water Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Average 2010-2015 Pop. Served 2260 2305 2350 2380 2410 2440 2470 2500 2970 2970 2970 2720 Total Connections 879 882 876 905 945 965 997 1006 1001 1002 1008 997 Res. Water Delivered (MG)62.44 78.56 69.3 72.6 72.11 69.94 72.53 78.67 75.07 67.1 65.27 71.43 C/I/I Water Delivered (MG)22.69 21.28 18.34 8.58 26.07 21.46 26.55 32.27 17.93 16.7 16.87 21.96 Other Water Delivered (MG)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.38 3.36 3.86 1.57 2.2 Wholesale Deliveries (MG)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.61 0.6 0.67 0.31 Total Water Delivered (MG)85.13 99.84 87.64 81.18 98.18 91.4 99.08 115.32 96.97 88.26 84.38 95.9 Total Water Pumped (MG)99.78 123.64 131.61 112.51 129.28 107.83 116.32 125.01 108.49 96.07 374.15 154.65 Water Supplier Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.71 2.85 275 47.26 Percent unmetered/ unaccounted 14.68%19.25%33.41%27.85%24.06%15.24%14.82%7.75%5.35%5.16%3.95%8.71% Average Daily Demand (MGD)0.27 0.34 0.36 0.31 0.35 0.3 0.32 0.34 0.3 0.26 1.03 0.42 Max Daily Demand (MGD)1.11 1.08 1.16 1.43 0.91 0.79 0.77 0.89 0.74 0.8 10.33 2.39 Date of Max Demand 7/10/2012 8/26/2013 8/27/2014 4/21/2015 Res. Per Capita Demand (GPCD)75.7 93.4 80.8 83.6 82 78.5 80.4 86.2 69.2 61.9 60.2 72.8 Total per Capita Demand (GPCD)121 147 153.4 129.5 147 121.1 129 137 100.1 88.6 345.1 153.5 Table 4C-4: Historic Water Demand CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 6 will conserve the amount of water pumped as well as preserve the life expectancy of the well pumps, and reduce waste. Water Demand Projections Water demand projections have been estimated with respect to the construction of new homes. For simplicity reasons, new industrial/commercial demands have been calculated by the available acreage for development. The population projections shown below indicate what the various water demands would be should the population increase to that value. The populations shown is only for planning purposes and it should not be presumed that this growth will occur. The proposed expansion areas of the distribution system are shown in Map 4C-2. From historical data previously presented, the average per capita daily water usage for the Navarre Water System has been selected as 100 gallons per capita per day (gpcpd) with a peaking factor of 2.0. The total average demand per capita for the Highway 12 Water System has been selected as 150 gpcpd with a peaking factor of 2.0. The population in the Highway 12 system is so small the commercial water use skews population based projections, therefore a 0.10 mgpd constant has been added. The selected water use values were then used with population projections to project future water demands which are presented in Tables 4C-5 and 4C-6. Service Area Population Average Daily Demand (MGD)1 Maximum Daily Demand (MGD)2 400 (2018)0.16 0.32 600 0.19 0.38 800 0.22 0.44 1,000 0.25 0.5 1,200 0.28 0.56 1,400 0.31 0.62 1,600 0.34 0.68 1,800 0.37 0.74 2,000 0.40 0.80 TABLE 4C-6: Projected Water Demand - Highway 12 1 Used an average day usage of 150 gpcpd, and 100K GPD of comcercial use 2 Use a peaking factor of 2.0 Service Area Population Average Daily Demand (MGD)1 Maximum Daily Demand (MGD)2 2,200 (2018)0.233 0.466 2,300 0.23 0.46 2,400 0.24 0.48 2,500 0.25 0.5 2,600 0.26 0.52 2,700 0.27 0.54 2,800 0.28 0.56 2,900 0.29 0.58 3,000 0.3 0.6 1 Used an average day usage of 100 gpcpd 2 Used a peaking factor of 2.0 Table 4C-5: Projected Water Demand - Navarre CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 7 WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION General This section provides an evaluation summary of the existing water supply, treatment, storage, and distribution systems for the City of Orono. The existing system consists of four water supply systems. These four systems consist of four supply wells, two elevated storage tanks, two water treatment facilities, and four distribution systems. The existing water infrastructure components have been evaluated in terms of current and future demands. Water Supply Wells Well Capacity The Recommended Standards for Water Works (Ten State Standards) recommends that the average day demand be met by the firm capacity. Firm capacity is the pumping capacity with the largest well out of service. In addition, the daily well output is calculated based on operating for 20 hours per day to allow 4 hours per day of aquifer recharge. Using these standards, the Navarre Water System has a total capacity of 1.80 MGD and a firm capacity of 0.60 MGD. The Highway 12 Water System has a total capacity of 1.60 MGD and a firm capacity of 0.6 MGD. Table 4C-1 earlier in this chapter summarizes well capacity. Table 4C-7 and Table 4C-8 present the number of wells that will be needed to meet future demand projections for the Navarre and Highway 12 systems. No additional wells are required for either system as both have adequate well capacity to meet future demands. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 8 Table 4C-7: Projected Water Supply - Navarre Service Area Population Average Day Demand (MGD) Maximum Day Demand (MGD) No. of New Wells Required Firm Capacity (MGD) Total Capacity (MGD) 2,200 (2018) 0.22 0.44 0 0.6 1.8 2,300 0.23 0.46 0 0.6 1.8 2,400 0.24 0.48 0 0.6 1.8 2,500 0.25 0.50 0 0.6 1.8 2,600 0.26 0.52 0 0.6 1.8 2,700 0.27 0.54 0 0.6 1.8 2,800 0.28 0.56 0 0.6 1.8 2,900 0.29 0.58 0 0.6 1.8 3,000 0.30 0.60 0 0.6 1.8 TABLE 4C-8 Projected Water Supply - Highway 12 Service Area Population Average Day Demand (MGD) Maximum Day Demand (MGD) No. of New Wells Required Firm Capacity (MGD) Total Capacity (MGD) 400 (2018) 0.16 0.32 0 0.6 1.6 600 0.19 0.38 0 0.6 1.6 800 0.22 0.44 0 0.6 1.6 1,000 0.25 0.50 0 0.6 1.6 1,200 0.28 0.56 0 0.6 1.6 1,400 0.31 0.62 0 0.6 1.6 1,600 0.34 0.68 0 0.6 1.6 1,800 0.37 0.74 0 0.6 1.6 2,000 0.40 0.80 0 0.6 1.6 Well Head Protection Well head protection should be given consideration when evaluating new well locations. Wellhead protection is a method of preventing contamination of public water supplies by managing potential contaminant sources in the area that contribute to a public water supply well. Land uses relative to commercial, industrial, and underground storage of chemicals and petroleum are considered higher risks to ground water protection than permanent open spaces, parks, farmland and low-density residential lots. All public water suppliers are required to implement wellhead protection measures. The Minnesota Department of Health CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 9 (MDH) was granted authority to implement wellhead protection and rules governing wellhead protection were adopted in March 2007. Grouping of wells eases wellhead protection and potential treatment beyond the existing facilities. Water Treatment At this time, the City does not need to pursue additional water treatment capacity at the Navarre WTP. However, the City should make chemical feed and other improvements at the Navarre WTP as outlined in Section 6 in the Water Supply Plan, 2018. Water Storage Details of the storage tanks are presented in Table 4C-2. The principal purpose of storage is to provide the ability to equalize pumping rates during periods of variable rate demand. Adequate storage permits a reduction in the size of the pumps required to supply a community because peak demands are diminished by the reserve provided in storage. Storage is typically provided in elevated tanks for communities the size of Orono to provide storage and a pressure source even when the wells are not pumping. The primary reasons for providing storage are as follows:  To equalize pressure in the distribution system.  For emergency requirements (pump failure, power failure).  Fire protection. Storage adequacy can be assessed using the Average Day Criteria or the Maximum Day, Fire Protection and Emergency Storage Criteria. Average Day Criteria Generally, the minimum recommended standard, without fire protection, is equal to the average day demand (Ten State Standards, 1997). By this standard, the Navarre Water System currently has a slight storage deficit since the average day demand is 220,000 gpd and the current storage capacity is 20,000 gallons. As shown in Table 4C-9, the Navarre Water System will have a storage deficit of 100,000 gallons when the population using the system reaches 3,000. 3000 population equates to about 335 new households. 100% build out of the planned development areas in the Navarre area identifies 250 new households. As shown in Table 4C-10, the Highway 12 Water System will have adequate storage until the population exceeds 2000 and the average day demand rises above 400,000 gpd. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 10 Maximum Day, Fire Protection and Emergency Storage Criteria Another approach is to consider the individual storage components for equalization, fire demand, and emergency reserve versus the available water supply production facilities. The water production and storage must be considered together, since an increase in production may decrease the amount of water storage required. Water storage requirements using this approach for the Navarre Water System and the Highway 12 Water System are summarized in Table 4C-11 and Table 4C-12. The current storage is not able to meet the maximum day, fire protection and emergency storage criteria for either water system. Service Area Population Avg. Day (GPD) Existing Storage (gallons) Storage Deficit 400 160,000 400,000 None 600 190,000 400,000 None 800 220,000 400,000 None 1,000 250,000 400,000 None 1,200 280,000 400,000 None 1,400 310,000 400,000 None 1,600 340,000 400,000 None 1,800 370,000 400,000 None 2,000 400,000 400,000 None TABLE 4C-10: Required Storage - Highway 12 Service Area Population Avg. Day (GPD) Existing Storage (gallons) Storage Deficit 2200 220,000 200,000 20,000 2,300 230,000 200,000 30,000 2,400 240,000 200,000 40,000 2,500 250,000 200,000 50,000 2,600 260,000 200,000 60,000 2,700 270,000 200,000 70,000 2,800 280,000 200,000 80,000 2,900 290,000 200,000 90,000 3,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 TABLE 4C-9 Required Storage - Navarre CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 11 TABLE 4C-11: Required Storage based on High Day - Navarre Population 2,200 (Existing) 2,400 2,600 2,800 3,000 Fire Demand (gpm)1 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Max. Day Demand (gpm) 421 459 498 536 574 Peak Usage (gpm) 2,421 2,459 2,498 2,536 2,574 Firm Pumping Supply (gpm)2 500 500 500 500 500 Withdrawal from Storage (gpm) 1,921 1,959 1,998 2,036 2,074 Fire Flow Duration (hrs) 3 3 3 3 3 Fire Demand Storage (gallons) 345,780 352,620 359,640 366,480 373,320 Emergency Storage (gallons)3 121,248 132,192 143,424 154,368 165,312 Total Storage Needed (gallons) 467,028 484,812 503,064 520,848 538,632 Current Available Storage (gallons) 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Net Storage Surplus/Deficit (gallons) -267,028 -284,812 -303,064 -320,848 -338,632 (1) Fire flow requirements vary within the City depending on type and construction of facilities. Fire flow requirements for normal residential development vary between 1,000 to 1,500 gpm. For multi-family and commercial areas such as the downtown business district, residential apartment areas, school and industrial areas; flows of 3,500 gpm for 3 hours are generally considered acceptable. (2) Based on firm capacity listed in Table 4C-7. (3) Emergency storage equals 20% of maximum day demand. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 12 TABLE 4C-12: Required Storage based on High Day - Highway 12 Population 400 (Existing) 800 1,200 1,600 Fire Demand (gpm)1 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Max. Day Demand (gpm) 422 844 1,266 1,689 Peak Usage (gpm) 2,422 2,844 3,266 3,689 Firm Pumping Supply (gpm)2 500 500 500 1,000 Withdrawal from Storage (gpm) 1,922 2,344 2,766 2,689 Fire Flow Duration (hrs) 3 3 3 3 Fire Demand Storage (gallons) 345,960 421,920 497,880 484,020 Emergency Storage (gallons)3 121,536 243,072 364,608 486,432 Total Storage Needed (gallons) 467,496 664,992 862,488 970,452 Current Available Storage (gallons) 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Net Storage Surplus/Deficit (gallons) -67,496 -264,992 -462,488 -570,452 (1) Fire flow requirements vary within the City depending on type and construction of facilities. Fire flow requirements for normal residential development vary between 1,000 to 1,500 gpm. For multi-family and commercial areas such as the downtown business district, residential apartment areas, school and industrial areas; flows of 3,500 gpm for 3 hours are generally considered acceptable. (2) Based on firm capacity listed in Table 4C-8 (3) Emergency storage equals 20% of maximum day demand. Water Distribution System General The analysis of a water distribution system often requires the use of a computer model of the system. A computer model is prepared which is calibrated with field data resulting in a model that simulates the known conditions of the system as closely as possible. This model provides a basis for simulation of existing system operations and deficiencies as well as future operating conditions of the system. From these simulations, determinations can be made as to the improvements that the system will need. The water distribution system for the City of Orono was modeled using Bentley’s WaterCad version 8.0. Modeling information can be found in the Water Supply Plan, 2018. Key findings are summarized here. Analysis of Existing Water System Existing Water Pressure. Average Day (AD) pressures in the existing system range from 50 to 78 psi. These pressures are within acceptable standards. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 13 According to Ten States Standards for Water Works (2012), an industry standard that the Minnesota Department of Health has adopted, pressures in the system should meet the following: “The minimum working pressure in the distribution system should be 35 psi (240 kPa) and the normal working pressure should be approximately 60 to 80 psi (410 - 550 kPa). When static pressures exceed 100 psi (690 kPa), pressure reducing devices shall be provided on mains or as part of the meter setting on individual service lines in the distribution system.“ Peak Hour (PH) pressures, which represent some of the highest non-emergency demands that a system will require, range from 44 to 73 psi, which is again within acceptable standards. Therefore, no deficiencies were identified during computer system analysis. Existing Available Fire Flow The modeled fire flows were run up to a maximum of 5,000 gpm. The minimum fire flow available at any given point in a system should not be less than 500 gpm at a residual pressure of 20 psi. This represents the amount of water required to provide for two standard hose streams on a fire in a typical residential area for residential dwellings with spacing of 100 feet. The distance between buildings and the corresponding fire flow is summarized in Table 4C-13. TABLE 4C-13: Recommended Fire Flows Distance Between Buildings Required Fire Flow (feet) (gpm) More Than 100 500 31-100 750 30-11 1,000 Less Than 11 1,500 Generally, available fire flows are adequate throughout the water distribution system. Areas with less than 500 gpm mostly include residential properties with limited water main looping due to locations along cul-de-sacs or dead end roads. The majority of these locations are in the Navarre system and the Wayzata System Extension. Pipe Velocities and Friction Losses Pipe segments are considered potentially deficient, or most-limiting, if they have the following conditions:  Velocities greater than 5 ft/s; and  Head losses greater than 10 ft/1000 ft. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 14 Velocities in pipe segments are acceptable up to about 10 ft/s during emergency or extreme demand conditions of short duration. As velocities increase, pipe friction increases and problems with water hammer occur. This is especially true in systems with higher pressures. The system has been checked for locations where velocities and head losses meet the above stated conditions. There are several locations where pipe velocities exceed 5 ft/s during emergency or peak demand flows. During normal operating conditions, no segments with high velocities or high head loss were observed. Long Lake Interconnections During emergency events, the Orono Highway 12 system and the Long Lake system are able to provide water service to each other through a series of interconnections. In the past, this arrangement is able to work for extended periods of time due to the large extra capacity of Long Lake wells, along with the large elevated storage in the City of Orono. In the event of emergency water supply needs, where one of the system wells are to be off-line for an extended period, the combined firm supply capacity is able to meet the maximum day demands of the combined systems by nearly 500,000 gallons. In addition, the combined water system can meet domestic demands for its customer base during the event that either tower is taken off line for repairs or rehabilitation. During these outages, available fire flows will be reduced significantly compared to when each tower is in operation. In the event of the Orono tank being taken off line, available fire flows will be reduced to approximately 700-750 gpm throughout the northwest area of the Highway 12 system. While adequate for residential fire flows, the fire department should be aware that tankers may be needed on-call if a larger fire occurs at a large industrial or institutional customer. There are currently four interconnections between the Long Lake and Orono (Highway 12) water systems. Two of the interconnections have automatic pressure reducing valves (PRVs) which allow emergency flow in either direction if an emergency occurs and system pressure drops below a minimum pressure setting. The interconnections are located near the following intersections:  Virginia Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard (Automatic PRV) • Shaughnessy Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard • Brimhall Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard(Automatic PRV) • Willow Drive North and Wayzata Boulevard The PRVs rarely operate, especially since the set points for operation are at low levels which are not impacted by normal operating conditions. The primary operation of these interconnections would be during an emergency such as a large fire when additional water would be required for the duration of the fire. In the CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 15 event that one system loses supply capacity or a tower is taken out of service, these interconnections can also be utilized. PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS General The major water system components have been evaluated in the previous sections. A detailed description of the proposed improvements is presented in this section. Water Supply The Navarre Water System currently has two wells with a firm capacity of 0.6 MGD. During the last four years, the maximum daily demand has averaged less than 0.5 MGD, which means the current water system has excess capacity. The service area of the Navarre Water System is close to full development so the population growth within the service area is expected to be minimal. Based off the current capacity of the wells and the expected population growth, no additional wells are needed for the Navarre Water System. The Highway 12 Water System was recently upgraded from one well which ran nearly 24 hours per day during the summer, to two wells. The firm capacity is 0.6 MGD. Based off the current capacity of the wells and the expected population growth, no additional wells are needed for the Navarre Water System. Treatment Facilities The objective of a water system is to provide quality water that is fit for domestic and commercial use. The City currently does not have any major water quality issues that need to be addressed, or major outstanding issues with both the Navarre WTP and the Highway 12 Well House Water Storage As discussed previously, the Navarre Water System has a current storage deficit of 20,000 gallons using the average day criteria and a storage deficit of 267,000 gallons using the maximum day, fire protection, and emergency storage criteria. The existing storage capacity is very close to meeting the current average demand and very little growth is expected in the Navarre Distribution System. Therefore, it is concluded that storage capacity is not needed at this time. If the City sees an increase in water demand for the Navarre System it may consider additional storage that would also meet the maximum day, fire protection, and emergency storage criteria. The Highway 12 Water System currently meets the average day criteria and has a storage deficit of 67,500 gallons using the maximum day, fire protection, and emergency storage criteria. Given that the existing storage meets the average day criteria and nearly meets the maximum day, fire protection, and emergency storage criteria, additional storage is not needed at this time. As water demands increase the City will need to consider added storage for the Highway 12 Water System. Distribution System CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 16 Proposed water distribution system expansion is illustrated on Map 4C-3. Improvements include water main extensions to serve expansion areas along the west edge of the Highway 12 system. In addition, a portion of the existing Highway 12 system is recommended to be increased in size from an 8 inch main to a 12 inch. This improved trunk main will increase available fire flow capacity during emergencies. In addition, water availability through the east interconnection will be improved. Depending on the future location of a new supply well to serve the Highway 12 system, the increased trunk capacity may also be required to allow adequate transmission of the increased supply capacity to the water tower. Long Lake Interconnections Based on computer modeling, not all of the existing interconnections are needed in the future. We recommend that the two primary automatic PRV interconnections (Virginia Avenue @Wayzata Boulevard and Brimhall Avenue @Wayzata Boulevard) are maintained. Two interconnections will provide adequate fire protection during an emergency. In addition, having these on the east and west sides of the distribution system provides for more redundancy of service as well. Upgrades to a 12 inch main along Wayzata Boulevard between Brimhall Avenue and Willow Drive North will also provide a better hydraulic connection for transmission of water during emergency events. WATER SYSTEM EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN Purpose The Orono Water System Emergency Preparedness Plan is a detailed description of procedures to follow should disruption to normal water service occur. Water system emergencies can occur as a result of accidental contamination, mechanical problems, power failures, drought, and other natural disasters. Disruptions to normal service may affect the entire water system or only parts of the system. While this plan cannot address all potential disasters, it is intended to provide City staff with a procedural guideline for implementation of actions resulting in the restoration of normal water service with a minimum of disruption, and minimizing any potential health risks. This plan is part of the City of Orono Emergency Preparedness Plan. Emergency Telephone Lists The City maintains a list of telephone numbers for key utility and City personnel, contacts in adjacent communities which may be affected, and other key local, state and federal contacts. Current Water Sources and Service Area 'As-Built' plans and specifications for both the Navarre and Highway 12 water systems are located on the City’s GIS and Asset Management Systems with hard copies located in the Public Works Map room at 2700 Kelley Parkway. These plans include service area maps as well as groundwater source information, individual well logs and pump specifications. Procedures For Augmenting Water Supplies A number of alternatives exist for augmenting existing water supplies: CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 17 Interconnections with Adjacent Communities Navarre System. Orono's Navarre water system is interconnected with the water systems operated by the City of Minnetonka Beach and the City of Spring Park.. The City of Orono has Reciprocal Emergency Water Supply agreements with both Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park (see Water Supply Plan, 2018). The high water level elevation in the Navarre water tower is estimated to be 1102.0 feet. The high water level elevation for Minnetonka Beach's water tower is estimated to be 1091.0 feet. The high water level elevation of Spring Park's water tower is estimated to be 1102.0 feet. Minnetonka Beach has two connection points with Orono - a 10” connection at Old County Road and an 8” connection at Northview Road. Spring Park was two 6" interconnections with Orono, one on Northern Avenue and the other at the intersection of Shadywood and Sunset. In the event that both wells are out of service the Navarre system could potentially be supplied by either the Spring Park or Minnetonka Beach systems, although it would likely place less of a burden on the Spring Park system. Table 4C-14: Additional Water Resources Other Water Supply System Owner Capacity (GPM & MGD) Note Any Limitations On Use List of services, equipment, supplies available to respond City of Minnetonka Beach 470 GPM, 0.677 MGD 417,000 GPD. SEE AGREEMENT. WATER SUPPLY City of Spring Park 1095 GPM, 1.576 MGD 969,000 GPD. SEE AGREEMENT WATER SUPPLY Other Water Supply System Owner Capacity (GPM & MGD) Note Any Limitations On Use List of services, equipment, supplies available to respond City of Long Lake 1,100 GPM, 1.584 MGD 630,000 GPD. SEE AGREEMENT WATER SUPPLY Highway 12 System Four interconnection points exist between Orono's Highway 12 water system and the Long Lake water system at: Virginia Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard; Shaughnessy Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard; Brimhall Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard; & Willow Drive North and Wayzata Boulevard. The City of Orono has a Reciprocal Emergency Water Supply agreement with the City of Long Lake. The high water elevation of the Highway 12 water tower is 1165'. Use Of Surface And Ground Waters As An Alternative Source. None- The nearest surface water source to the Navarre area is Lake Minnetonka. The nearest surface water source to Highway 12 is Long Lake. However, both lakes have a high susceptibility to contamination. Due to the high cost of treatment, neither Lake Minnetonka nor Long Lake are feasible as sources of water. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 18 Demand Reduction Procedures Demand Reduction Potential In a water supply emergency, demand could be reduced by implementation of various measures such as voluntary restrictions or a lawn sprinkling ban. Additionally, non- essential high-volume uses such as commercial car washing could be banned. Both measures could potentially result in short term demand reductions. Short-Term Demand Reduction Procedures Orono Municipal Code Section 14-136 establishes regulations for the use of water during periods of water shortage. Subsection 136(e)(1) enumerates a number of restrictions which the City Council may order singly or in combination to effectuate demand reduction. These restrictions are listed in order of progressively increasing stringency:  Voluntary restriction, to be implemented via public notice in the local newspapers, "bill stuffers" and public service announcements.  Odd/even watering ban in which residents of addresses ending in an even digit may water on even-numbered calendar days and residents of addresses ending in an odd digit may water on odd-numbered calendar days.  Complete or partial ban on water use for watering lawns, trees and shrubs, irrigation, car washing, filling swimming pools, air conditioning, and/or other uses determined by the City to be non-essential, or any combination thereof. Water Emergency Condition Orono Municipal Code Section 14-137 establishes procedures which may be implemented by the City Administrator in the event of a water emergency. The Administrator may order an immediate general sprinkling ban or an odd-even sprinkling ban, and may curtail industrial water use. The Administrator may approve exemptions to such actions, and establish necessary conditions for such exemptions, upon written request from 1) commercial enterprises whose economic well-being is dependent upon sprinkling, irrigating or watering of a lawn, grass or turf owned, leased or operated by such enterprise; 2) employees and agents of the City wherein lawn, grass or turf used for play fields or areas owned or operated by the City require more frequent watering to prevent unreasonable damage thereto; and 3) owners and lessees of lands newly sodded or grass seeded which requires sprinkling or irrigation to prevent loss of new sod, seed or immature turf or grasses. The following actions will be taken to control demand during a Water Emergency Condition: Administrative Actions  An educational program that describes the severity and effects of the emergency will be instituted.  Prohibit outdoor sprinkling on a continual basis. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 19  Increase penalties and fees for violation of the sprinkling ordinance.  Limit or prohibit swimming pool filling, car washing, and other similar nonessential residential uses.  Limit or prohibit use of water for commercial car washes.  Restrict restaurants from serving water to customers on a voluntary basis.  Require operators of large air conditioning systems (if they exist) to recycle cooled water as appropriate. Utility Operation Program. The performance of routine public operations shall be redirected to reduce water demand. The following actions which can be easily implemented on a short-term basis may affect the aesthetics of the City but will not harm City facilities on a long-term basis:  Reduce sewer cleaning activities.  Reduce fire hydrant and main flushing activities to an absolute minimum.  Eliminate street cleaning activities.  Eliminate fire-fighting training practices that utilize water.  Purchase water from the City of Long Lake if the emergency condition is limited to the Orono water supply system. PROCEDURES FOR WATER ALLOCATION Allocation of water by the City of Orono may be required during a severe water shortage. When supply augmentation or demand reduction measures are determined to be inadequate, water allocation may be implemented in conformance with the following priorities established by Minnesota Statutes 103G.261: 1. First Priority: Domestic water supply, excluding commercial and industrial uses of municipal water supply, and use for power production that meets the statutory contingency planning requirements. 2. Second Priority: Water uses involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons of water per day. 3. Third Priority: Agricultural irrigation, and processing of agricultural products involving consumption in excess of 10,000 gallons per day. 4. Fourth Priority: Power production in excess of the use provided for in the contingency plan noted above under "First Priority". 5. Fifth Priority: Uses other than agricultural irrigation, processing of agricultural products and power production, involving consumption in excess of 10,000 gallons per day. 6. Sixth Priority: Non-essential uses. Non-essential uses are defined in Minnesota Statutes 103G.291 as including but not limited to lawn sprinkling, vehicle washing, and golf CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 20 course and park irrigation. Non-essential water uses will be the first water uses subject to allocation restrictions. Quick responses to restrict non-essential uses during periods of limited supplies will help protect domestic and economic uses of water. Triggers For Implementing Plan Components Navarre A water emergency condition for the Navarre system is defined if one or more of the following conditions occur:  The water tower levels are insufficient to provide adequate fire protection, or  The production facilities are unable to reestablish a minimum water reserve in storage, or  The water demand in one 24-hour period exceeds the firm pumping capacity of the system, 720,000 gallons. Highway 12 A water Emergency Condition@ for the Highway 12 system is defined if one or more of the following conditions occur:  The water tower levels are insufficient to provide adequate fire protection, or  The production facilities are unable to reestablish a minimum water reserve in storage, or  The water demand in one 24-hour period exceeds 575,000 GPD, i.e. approximately 80% of the 720,000 GPD system capacity. Wayzata System Extension The Wayzata system extension is a small part of the total Wayzata system. Triggers and plan implementations established by City of Wayzata will be adhered to. The City of Orono may include the Wayzata System Extension water customers in any general water restriction placed on Orono residents. Long Lake System Extensions The Long Lake system extensions are a small part of the total Long Lake system. Triggers and plan implementations established by City of Long Lake will be adhered to. The City of Orono may include the Long Lake System Extension water customers in any general water restriction placed on Orono residents. Notice City ordinances define two levels of urgency in establishing water use restrictions. During periods of water shortage which are not considered to be water emergencies, the City Council may implement restrictions by resolution or Ordinance. Such resolution shall define: the uses of water that will be restricted; the types of water supply that will be restricted, such as the public water system, private wells, lake or CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 21 other surface water systems; times during which the restriction will apply; whether the use restriction will apply to all property in the City or will vary depending on location or identification of property; when the restrictions will be implemented and when they will terminate; and whether the restrictions will be voluntary or involuntary. Notice of the restrictions will be posted on the website, sent via social media and direct mailings and published in the local newspaper, and will become effective 24 hours after passage and publication. If the City Administrator determines that the water pressure and available water in the municipal water system reaches a level which endangers the public health or safety, he may declare a water emergency. Upon such declaration, notice will be given to the news media, social media and city website, and all orders restricting water use shall be enforceable one (1) hour from the time of such notice. Enforcement By ordinance, violation of a mandatory water use restriction is a misdemeanor. Failure to comply may lead to fines or discontinued water service (Section 14-75). Water use restrictions will be monitored by City staff and enforced as necessary CONSERVATION PLAN Role Of Conservation. The City of Orono Water Conservation Plan is intended to reduce the demand for water, improve the efficiency of use of water, and reduce losses and waste of water. Water conservation has the potential to delay or eliminate the need for development of supplemental water sources to meet peak demands for nonessential water uses. Reduction in the peak demand through conservation efforts is preferable to major City expenditures for increasing water source, treatment and storage capacities. Water Conservation Potential. The Navarre System serves residential and commercial uses, conservation efforts will be focused on ensuring the wise use of water as well as updating the treatment facility and making system repairs as necessary. As the residential housing stock is renovated by homeowners, City enforcement of the State plumbing codes will ensure use of water efficient fixtures. The Highway 12 system serves a variety of users including both single- family and multi-family residential uses that are still developing, commercial and industrial uses, and the Orono Schools complex. New homes will be required by State plumbing codes to install water-efficient fixtures. New or expanding commercial, industrial, and institutional users will be encouraged (and required when appropriate) to establish water- conserving policies and use water-efficient equipment. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 22 Water Conservation Programs The city will endeavor to implement the MnDNR Conservation Objectives and Strategies. MnDNR objectives 1. MnDNR Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non-Revenue) Water loss to Less than 10%. The city is currently meeting this objective. Thorough water audits, leak detection and preventive maintenance. 2. MnDNR Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD). The city is meeting this objective with a 5 year average per capita demand of 73 Gal/day. The average residential per capita water demand has been on a downward trend since a high of 93.4 gpcd in 2006 to a low of 60.2 gpcd in 2015. 3. MnDNR Objective 3: Achieve at least 1.5% annual reduction in non-residential per capita water use. Education- The City will continue to provide residents information pamphlets via newsletter and social media as such pamphlets become available from the DNR and MDH. There is very little C/I/I or Ag water usage within the City of Orono. 4. MnDNR Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand. The Residential per capita water demand has been trending downward since 2005, with a years of spikes within the data. These spikes can likely be attributed to years with less rainfall, which leads to greater irrigation use within the residential sector. It is likely that the trend will continue downward as time progresses due to increased education about water use and a recently revised water rate structure. The C/I/I per capita water demand appears to be trending downward overall with various spikes and fluctuations throughout the years. These sometimes large fluctuations can be attributed to the smaller and ever changing client base that is present in the City within the C/I/I category. 5. MnDNR Objective 5: Reduce Ratio of Maximum day (peak day) to the Average Day Demand to Less Than 2.6. Calculate a ten-year average (2005 – 2014) of the ratio of maximum day demand to average day demand is 4.8. This high ratio is likely due to excessive irrigation in the summer months. The city will continue to encourage responsible water use though educational efforts and discourage individual high water use through our tiers water rate structure. 6. MnDNR Objective 6: Implement Demand Reduction Measures. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 23 City Conservation Strategies 1. Metering. All water customers on Orono's three water systems are metered. All new users added to the system will be metered. All customers purchase meters through the City, and meters are tested, recalibrated, and repaired on an as-required basis. Meters are read by City personnel quarterly. 2. Water Audits, Leak Detection and Repair. The volume of unaccounted-for water is determined on an annual basis. Unaccounted- for water is defined as the volume of water withdrawn from the source minus the volume of water sold. Water not accounted for may be a result of meter under-registration; various forms of public unmetered use such as hydrant flushing, appropriation by fire departments, and illegal connections or appropriations; or system leakage. The city conducts annual leak detection as a means of identifying and repair leaks. 3. Conservation-Oriented Water Rates. Water customers are billed quarterly. Water rates are reviewed by the City annually and adjusted as necessary with the goal of paying for the true cost of supplying, treating and delivering water as well as maintaining the distribution system. Past reviews have resulted in the adoption of a hydrant charge to those properties where water is available but unconnected. Capital expenditures are financed through the use of connection charges, area charges, and special assessments. Since 2010 the city has used a conservation-oriented water rate structure. The conservation-oriented structure establishes Water Usage Tiers that vary between residential, multi-family and commercial users and are based on usage. 4. Regulation. Orono has adopted a number of regulations to provide short-term demand reductions and long-term improvements in water use efficiencies:  Short-Term Demand Reduction Procedures: Municipal Code Sections 14-136 and 14-137 define measures for short-term demand reduction. The Code identifies a number of restrictions which the City Council may order singly or in combination to effectuate demand reduction, and provides procedures for enforcement of such measures.  Long-Term Demand Reduction: Long-term demand reduction will be accomplished by enforcement of the State and Federal Plumbing Codes which require the use of water efficient fixtures in new home construction as well as when retrofitting. 5. Education and Information Programs. The City of Orono will make an effort to promote efficient water use on an ongoing basis. Education of the public on the benefits of water conservation will include articles CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 24 in the City newsletter as well as the use of "bill stuffers", and support for school curriculums on water resources such as National Drinking Water Week. During periods of limited water supplies when public awareness is high, the City will issue public service announcements through the local mass media including local newspapers, and will notify the public via direct mailings of water conservation and demand reduction measures in effect. 6. Retrofitting Programs. Existing plumbing codes requiring the use of water-conserving fixtures when retrofitting buildings, will continue to be enforced by the Building Inspections Department. The City will investigate whether establishment of a mandatory retrofitting program unrelated to concurrent remodeling projects would be feasible or cost efficient. GOALS AND POLICIES The City of Orono's water supply goals are as follows: 1. Provide an adequate supply of potable water to all residences and occupied properties in Orono. 2. Provide an adequate supply of water for fire protection in urban-density neighborhoods and commercial/industrial districts in Orono. 3. Protect the City’s natural resources- Water. The City of Orono's water supply policies are as follows: 1. All occupied properties within Orono shall be provided with a potable water supply and minimum sanitary facilities as required by the Minnesota Health Department. 2. Individual wells will be considered to be acceptable water supply for low- density urban and rural residential neighborhoods. Industrial, commercial and multi-family residential development will be permitted only within the municipal water service area where supplies are sufficient for domestic, process and fire protection purposes. 3. Municipal water supply systems will be provided only within the Urban Service Area. Rural land use must be of the type and density to be adequately served by individual private wells. 4. Municipal water supply systems will be provided only where sufficient land use density and/or user demand will make the public investment economically feasible. Municipal water systems will not be extended to all neighborhoods in the urban service area. Many urban residential areas that received municipal sewer for public health and environmental reasons have relatively low land use density and can be adequately served by private wells at much less total cost than by extensive water system CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 25 extension. 5. New urban developments will be served by developer-installed mains. Municipal water mains may be extended within the boundaries of the urban area to serve new development on vacant properties provided the development occurs at the established zoned density, the development does not overburden or exceed the design capacity of the existing system, and the developer pays and finances the entire cost of the project. 6. The city will operate and maintain the municipal water system. To assure cost effectiveness and quality control, the City will own, operate and maintain the entire municipal water system of mains and laterals up to and including the curb stop on each property. Each property owner must purchase a meter from the City and install it in an approved manner and location. 7. All water serviced properties must be connected. No new well or well repair permits will be issued where municipal water service is available. Existing operable wells may be used provided the water is potable and the well conforms to MHD requirements. Individual connections will be required for each separate residence and/or place of business. 8. Water service construction will conform to state codes. Installation of new building service lines, connection stubs, or water mains shall be by licensed plumbing contractors, and installation or repair of wells shall be by licensed well drillers; all construction shall utilize materials and methods approved by the Minnesota State Board of Health. 9. The City will endeavor to meet the MnDNR’s Conservation Objectives. FUTURE WATER SYSTEM Orono’s plan for future water facilities includes upgrades to existing local water facilities. Future Water System Improvements The City’s focus on future water system needs will be on a limited number of extensions to service new developments within the existing urban area and maintenance of the existing system. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 26 Future Water System Expansion Projects The table below lists possible future sewer expansion projects. Table 4C-15: Future Expansion Projects Improvement Projected Year of completion Triggering Event 1 Orono Preserve Development – Water Distribution main to serve 39 single family homes 2018 Under Construction 2 Shadywood Villas Development-Water Distribution to service 7 single family homes. 2018 Under Construction 4 CSAH 112 Water Main Extension- Extension of water main West along CSAH 112 from Old Crystal Bay Road to serve future developments planned on the south side of CSAH 112. 2019 1 Approved Preliminary Plat for Developments 5 Highway 12 Water Main upsize to 12”. 2020 CSAH 112 Turn back Ph3 project 1 Schedule is dependent on development timing, size and/or location. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 27 Future Water Maintenance Needs Orono is committed to maintaining and improving the existing water distribution system. In addition to the normal routine and reactive maintenance operations the city is committed to the following proactive/ preventive maintenance programs: Table 4C-16: Future Water System Maintenance Needs Program Description Purpose Annual Budget (2018 $s) Water Main replacements This project includes the replacement of select water mains in within the system. Where possible utility replacements are synchronized with road reconstructions. Many of the city’s water mains were installed in late 1960s and early 1970s and are cast iron pipe. Over the years the city has had issues with cast iron pipe deterioration based. $200,000 Valve Exercising Each year all of the Water Valves within the city should be exercised. Ensures proper operation. Helps identify future replacement needs. $5,000 Hydrant Flushing Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation projects will consist of Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) lining of infiltration susceptible sanitary sewer pipes, manhole reconstruction, and lid replacement. Reduce Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) into the Sanitary sewer systems. The lining process creates and new durable pipe within the older pipe at a much reduced cost from open curing or directionally drilling. $265,225 Well inspection and maintenance This project includes the inspection and rehabilitation/ replacement of a Well’s pumps, motors, and column piping. Each well is inspected every 7 years. To ensure a continued, dependable supply of quality water from the City’s well periodic maintenance is required $20,000 Water Meter Replacement This project includes the replacement of all of the water meters within the city. The project will be phased over 5 years. Meters have a 15 year life. $90,000 Water Tower Maintenance Pressure wash of north water tower, inside and out; perform repairs to interior and exterior coatings and perform preventive maintenance checks and services. (Once every 5 years) Preventive maintenance. $12,500 Resourcing City water service will be self-supporting. The operation, maintenance and depreciation financing of the municipal water supply system will be completely financed by user charges sufficient to cover all allocable costs without requiring any general tax subsidy. Water charges shall be equitably established on the basis of actual use and/or fire protection advantage while at the same time designed to encourage resource conservation. CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 28 Operating and Maintenance Budget The City shall remain committed to fully funding the operations and maintenance needs of the City’s water system. Funding will continue to come from the Water fees. Capital Improvement Plan The City manages capital expenditures for the Water system as part of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP provides long-term planning and management of infrastructure throughout the City. The CIP is a planning document that presents a 5+ year overview of scheduled capital projects to address the City’s goals for public infrastructure. The CIP includes a long-term financing plan that allows the City to allocate funds for these projects based on assigned priorities. The 5+ year horizon of the CIP provides the City with an opportunity to evaluate project priorities annually and to adjust the timing, scope and cost of projects as new information becomes available. The information contained in this plan represents an estimate of improvement costs based on present knowledge and expected conditions. Changes in community priorities, infrastructure condition and inflation rates require that adjustments be made on a routine basis. Funding for Acquisition and Capital Improvements Funding for Water system Capital improvement projects comes from the Enterprise Water Fund, special assessments, and connection charges. UT ")W")W ")W )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake L o ngLak eCreek PainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrHunter DrStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArmDrAzure RoadBrownRoadN H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake R o a dDay PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Tamarack DrSugar woodDrRegent s W a lkC y gnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SCanterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N S h o r e line D r Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_4C-1_WaterService Area_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/9/2018 10:53:52 AM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Water Service AreaNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Water Distribution North PressureZone NavarrePressure Zone Long LakePressure Zone WayzataPressure Zone ProposedExpansionAreas ")W Wells UT Water Storage Watermain Map 4C-1 ")W")W GsWX G½WX GoWX SpringParkBay Carman'sBay WestArm LafayetteBay CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SunsetDrTon k a BayRoad NShoreDr NavarreLnBrook s L nN Arm DrN Shore Dr ShorelineDr Wilshire BlvdShoreline Dr Cherry Ave ParkLn Nor t h e r n A v e Crystal Pl Arcola L n F agernessPointR oad Lyric AveWArmRoad PenceLnTo go Road C r y s ta lBayRoadKelly Ave Man ito u RoadShadywoodRoad N orth v ie w Roa dWestwood Road CirRoadParkDrLivingstonAveBohnsPointRoadCasco Poi nt R o a dConcordiaSt CascoCi r Ivy P l Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_4C-2_ProposedExpansionAreas_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/9/2018 12:38:12 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Proposed Expansion AreasNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 0.33MilesSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I UT ")WGVWX112 GVWX146 )n LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLakeC r e e kLo n g LakeCree k Starkey Road6 t h A v e N BrownRoadNWatertown Road Kel le rRoa d Willow Dr NKelley Pkwy Daniels St Lakeview AveOrchard Ln Grand Ave Leaf StLake StOld Crystal Bay Road NWearLnNG l endaleDrPhillipsDrHo m e s teadTrlH igh L n Colin Dr Ne i ls on Ave CreeksideDrWayzata Blvd W S ome rsetL n Devin L nCo untryside Dr W Willow Dr SHarringtonDrStubbs Bay Road NWillowViewDr Sugarwood D rCygnetPl Willow Dr)n GoWX Ferndale Road N8th Av e N Queenslan dLnNCountyRoad1013rd Ave N HollybrookRoad Wayzata Blvd W Barry Ave N4th Ave N 6t hAv e NOldLongLake Road Rice St E Park St E Gardner St ERi d geview Dr EWayzataBlvdEWestwoodLnS 9thA v e N CountyRoad155 thAveN 10th Ave N W o odh illRoadHighw ay 12EWakefieldRoadBroadway Ave NCentral Ave NNarcissusLnNInlandLnN BrocktonLn N M a rg a r e t Ci r Water Distribution North PressureZone NavarrePressure Zone Long LakePressure Zone WayzataPressure Zone ProposedExpansionAreas ")W Wells UT Water Storage Watermain Map 4C-2 ")W")W GsWX G½WX GoWX SpringParkBay Carman'sBay WestArm LafayetteBay CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SunsetDrTon k a BayRoad NShoreDr NavarreLnBrook s L nN Arm DrN Shore Dr ShorelineDr Wilshire BlvdShoreline Dr Cherry Ave ParkLn Nor t h e r n A v e Crystal Pl Arcola L n F agernessPointR oad Lyric AveWArmRoad PenceLnTo go Road C r y s ta lBayRoadKelly Ave Man ito u RoadShadywoodRoad N orth v ie w Roa dWestwood Road CirRoadParkDrLivingstonAveBohnsPointRoadCasco Poi nt R o a dConcordiaSt CascoCi r Ivy P l Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\Water_Resources\ORNO_4C-3_ProposedWaterDistribution_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/9/2018 1:01:08 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Proposed Water Distribution SystemNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 0.33MilesSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I UT ")WGVWX112 GVWX146 )n LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLakeC r e e kLo n g LakeCree k Starkey Road6 t h A v e N BrownRoadNWatertown Road Kel le rRoa d Willow Dr NKelley Pkwy Daniels St Lakeview AveOrchard Ln Grand Ave Leaf StLake StOld Crystal Bay Road NWearLnNG l endaleDrPhillipsDrHo m e s teadTrlH igh L n Colin Dr Ne i ls on Ave CreeksideDrWayzata Blvd W S ome rsetL n Devin L nCo untryside Dr W Willow Dr SHarringtonDrStubbs Bay Road NWillowViewDr Sugarwood D rCygnetPl Willow Dr)n GoWX Ferndale Road N8th Av e N Queenslan dLnNCountyRoad1013rd Ave N HollybrookRoad Wayzata Blvd W Barry Ave N4th Ave N 6t hAv e NOldLongLake Road Rice St E Park St E Gardner St ERi d geview Dr EWayzataBlvdEWestwoodLnS 9thA v e N CountyRoad155 thAveN 10th Ave N W o odh illRoadHighw ay 12EWakefieldRoadBroadway Ave NCentral Ave NNarcissusLnNInlandLnN BrocktonLn N M a rg a r e t Ci r Water Distribution UpgradedWatermain FutureWatermain Watermain ")W Wells UT Water Storage ProposedExpansionAreas North PressureZone NavarrePressure Zone Long LakePressure Zone WayzataPressure Zone Map 4C-2 1 Local Water Supply Plan Template Third Generation for 2016 -2018 Revised April 10, 2017 Formerly called Water Emergency & Water Conservation Plan 2 Cover photo by Molly Shodeen For more information on this Water Supply Plan Template, please contact the DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources at (651) 259-5034 or (651) 259-5100. Copyright 2015 State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources This information is available in an alternative format upon request. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability or activity on behalf of a local human rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240. 3 Table of contents INTRODUCTION TO WATER SUPPLY PLANS (WSP) ................................................................ 6 Who needs to complete a Water Supply Plan ............................................................................ 6 Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA) ............................................................................... 6 Benefits of completing a WSP .................................................................................................... 6 WSP Approval Process ............................................................................................................... 7 PART 1. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION .................................. 9 A. Analysis of Water Demand .................................................................................................. 9 B. Treatment and Storage Capacity....................................................................................... 11 Treatment and storage capacity versus demand ........................................................................ 12 C. Water Sources ................................................................................................................... 12 Limits on Emergency Interconnections ...................................................................................... 13 D. Future Demand Projections – Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark .............................. 13 Water Use Trends ...................................................................................................................... 13 Projection Method..................................................................................................................... 15 E. Resource Sustainability ..................................................................................................... 15 Monitoring – Key DNR Benchmark ............................................................................................. 15 Water Level Data ....................................................................................................................... 15 Potential Water Supply Issues & Natural Resource Impacts – Key DNR & Metropolitan Council Benchmark ................................................................................................................................ 16 Wellhead Protection (WHP) and Source Water Protection (SWP) Plans ...................................... 22 F. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) ........................................................................................ 23 Adequacy of Water Supply System............................................................................................. 23 Proposed Future Water Sources ................................................................................................ 24 Water Source Alternatives - Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark ............................................ 24 PART 2. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROCEDURES ...................................................... 24 A. Emergency Response Plan ............................................................................................... 25 B. Operational Contingency Plan ........................................................................................... 25 C. Emergency Response Procedures .................................................................................... 25 4 Emergency Telephone List ......................................................................................................... 25 Current Water Sources and Service Area.................................................................................... 26 Procedure for Augmenting Water Supplies ................................................................................ 26 Allocation and Demand Reduction Procedures .......................................................................... 27 Notification Procedures ............................................................................................................. 29 Enforcement .............................................................................................................................. 30 PART 3. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN ................................................................................. 31 Progress since 2006 ................................................................................................................. 31 A. Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions ................................................... 32 B. Conservation Objectives and Strategies – Key benchmark for DNR ............................... 33 Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non-Revenue) Water loss to Less than 10% ......................... 33 Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD) ..................... 35 Objective 3: Achieve at least 1.5% annual reduction in non-residential per capita water use ..... 36 Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand ........................................ 37 Objective 5: Reduce Ratio of Maximum day to the Average Day Demand to Less Than 2.6 ........ 38 Objective 6: Implement Demand Reduction Measures ............................................................... 38 Objective 7: Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use and Support Wellhead Protection Planning .................................................................................................................................... 40 Objective 8: Tracking Success: How will you track or measure success through the next ten years? ........................................................................................................................................ 41 C. Regulation .......................................................................................................................... 41 D. Retrofitting Programs ......................................................................................................... 42 Retrofitting Programs ................................................................................................................ 42 E. Education and Information Programs ................................................................................ 43 Proposed Education Programs ................................................................................................... 43 PART 4. ITEMS FOR METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNITIES ................................................ 47 A. Water Demand Projections through 2040 ......................................................................... 47 B. Potential Water Supply Issues ........................................................................................... 47 5 C. Proposed Alternative Approaches to Meet Extended Water D emand Projections .......... 47 D. Value-Added Water Supply Planning Efforts (Optional) ................................................... 48 Source Water Protection Strategies ........................................................................................... 48 Technical assistance .................................................................................................................. 48 GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................................. 50 Acronyms and Initialisms .......................................................................................................... 52 APPENDICES TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE WATER SUPPLIER ............................................. 52 Appendix 1: Well records and maintenance summaries ......................................................... 52 Appendix 2: Water level monitoring plan ................................................................................. 52 Appendix 3: Water level graphs for each water supply well ..................................................... 52 Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan .................................................................................... 52 Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List .................................................................................. 52 Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services ............................................. 52 Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Ordinance .................................................... 52 Appendix 8: Graph of Ten Years of Annual Per Capita Water Demand for Each Customer Category .................................................................................................................................... 52 Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure ........................................................................................... 52 Appendix 10: Ordinances or Regulations Related to Water Use ............................................. 52 Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist .................................................................................. 52 Appendix 12: Sources of Information for Table 10 .................................................................. 52 6 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES – DIVISION OF ECOLOGICAL AND WATER RESOURCES AND METROPOLITAN COUNCIL INTRODUCTION TO WATER SUPPLY PLANS (WSP) Who needs to complete a Water Supply Plan Public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people, large private water suppliers in designated Groundwater Management Areas, and all water suppliers in the Twin Cities metropolitan area are required to prepare and submit a water supply plan. The goal of the WSP is to help water suppliers: 1) implement long term water sustainability and conservation measures; and 2) develop critical emergency preparedness measures. Your community needs to know what measures will be implemented in case of a water crisis. A lot of emergencies can be avoided or mitigated if long term sustainability measures are implemented. Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA) The DNR has designated three areas of the state as Groundwater Management Areas (GWMAs) to focus groundwater management efforts in specific geographies where there is an added risk of overuse or water quality degradation. A plan directing the DNRs actions within each GWMA has been prepared. Although there are no specific additional requirements with respect to the water supply planning for communities within designated GWMAs, communities should be aware of the issues and actions planned if they are within the boundary of one of the GWMAs. The three GWMAs are the North and East Metro GWMA (Twin Cities Metro), the Bonanza Valley GWMA and the Straight River GWMA (near Park Rapids). Additional information and maps are included in the DNR Groundwater Management Areas webpage. Benefits of completing a WSP Completing a WSP using this template, fulfills a water supplier’s statutory obligations under M.S. M.S.103G.291 to complete a water supply plan. For water suppliers in the metropolitan area, the WSP will help local governmental units to fulfill their requirements under M.S. 473.859 to complete a local comprehensive plan. Additional benefits of completing WSP template:  The standardized format allows for quicker and easier review and approval  Help water suppliers prepare for droughts and water emergencies.  Create eligibility for funding requests to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) for the Drinking Water Revolving Fund.  Allow water suppliers to submit requests for new wells or expanded capacity of existing wells.  Simplify the development of county comprehensive water plans and watershed plans.  Fulfill the contingency plan provisions required in the MDH wellhead protection and surface water protection plans.  Fulfill the demand reduction requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.291 subd 3 and 4. 7  Upon implementation, contribute to maintaining aquifer levels, reducing potential well interference and water use conflicts, and reducing the need to drill new wells or expand system capacity.  Enable DNR to compile and analyze water use and conservation data to help guide decisions.  Conserve Minnesota’s water resources If your community needs assistance completing the Water Supply Plan, assistance is available from your area hydrologist or groundwater specialist, the MN Rural Waters Association circuit rider program, or in the metropolitan area from Metropolitan Council staff. Many private consultants are also available. WSP Approval Process 10 Basic Steps for completing a 10-Year Water Supply Plan 1. Download the DNR/Metropolitan Council Water Supply Plan Template from the DNR Water Supply Plan webpage. 2. Save the document with a file name with this naming convention: WSP_cityname_permitnumber_date.doc. 3. The template is a form that should be completed electronically. 4. Compile the required water use data (Part 1) and emergency procedures information (Part 2) 5. The Water Conservation section (Part 3) may need discussion with the water department, council, or planning commission, if your community does not already have an active water conservation program. 6. Communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area should complete all the information discussed in Part 4. The Metropolitan Council has additional guidance information on their Water Supply webpage. All out-state water suppliers do not need to complete the content addressed in Part 4. 7. Use the Plan instructions and Checklist document from the DNR Water Supply Plan webpage to insure all data is complete and attachments are included. This will allow for a quicker approval process. 8. Plans should be submitted electronically using the MPARS website – no paper documents are required. 9. DNR hydrologist will review plans (in cooperation with Metropolitan Council in Metro area) and approve the plan or make recommendations. 10. Once approved, communities should complete a Certification of Adoption form, and send a copy to the DNR. 8 Complete Table 1 with information about the public water supply system covered by this WSP. Table 1. General information regarding this WSP Requested Information Description DNR Water Appropriation Permit Number(s) 1970-1351 Ownership ☒ Public or ☐ Private Metropolitan Council Area ☒ Yes or ☐ No (Hennepin County) Street Address 2750 Kelley Parkway City, State, Zip Orono, MN 55356 Contact Person Name Adam Edwards Title Director of Public Works/City Engineer Phone Number 952-249-4600 MDH Supplier Classification Municipal 9 PART 1. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION The first step in any water supply analysis is to assess the current status of demand and availability. Information summarized in Part 1 can be used to develop Emergency Preparedness Procedures (Part 2) and the Water Conservation Plan (Part 3). This data is also needed to track progress for water efficiency measures. A. Analysis of Water Demand Complete Table 2 showing the past 10 years of water demand data.  Some of this information may be in your Wellhead Protection Plan.  If you do not have this information, do your best, call your engineer for assistance or if necessary leave blank. If your customer categories are different than the ones listed in Table 2, please describe the differences below: “Other” water includes water sold through interconnections to neighboring towns. “Wholesale” is water sold in bulk. 10 Table 2. Historic water demand (see definitions in the glossary after Part 4 of this template) Year Pop. Served Total Connections Residential Water Delivered (MG) C/I/I Water Delivered (MG) Other Water Delivered (MG) Wholesale Deliveries (MG) Total Water Delivered (MG) Total Water Pumped (MG) Water Supplier Services Percent Unmetered/ Unaccounted Average Daily Demand (MGD) Max. Daily Demand (MGD) Date of Max. Demand Residential Per Capita Demand (GPCD) Total per capita Demand (GPCD) 2005 2260 879 62.44 22.69 0.00 0 85.13 99.78 0.00 14.68% 0.27 1.11 N/A 75.7 121.0 2006 2305 882 78.56 21.28 0.00 0 99.84 123.64 0.00 19.25% 0.34 1.08 N/A 93.4 147.0 2007 2350 876 69.30 18.34 0.00 0 87.64 131.61 0.00 33.41% 0.36 1.16 N/A 80.8 153.4 2008 2380 905 72.60 8.58 0.00 0 81.18 112.51 0.00 27.85% 0.31 1.43 N/A 83.6 129.5 2009 2410 945 72.11 26.07 0.00 0 98.18 129.28 0.00 24.06% 0.35 0.91 N/A 82.0 147.0 2010 2440 965 69.94 21.46 0.00 0 91.40 107.83 0.00 15.24% 0.30 0.79 N/A 78.5 121.1 2011 2470 997 72.53 26.55 0.00 0 99.08 116.32 0.00 14.82% 0.32 0.77 N/A 80.4 129.0 2012 2500 1006 78.67 32.27 4.38 0 115.32 125.01 0.00 7.75% 0.34 0.89 7/10/2012 86.2 137.0 2013 2970 1001 75.07 17.93 3.36 0.61 102.68 108.49 5.71 5.35% 0.30 0.74 8/26/2013 69.2 100.1 2014 2970 1002 67.10 16.70 3.86 0.6 91.11 96.07 2.85 5.16% 0.26 0.80 8/27/2014 61.9 88.6 2015 2970 1008 65.27 16.87 1.57 0.67 359.38 374.15 275.00 3.95% 1.03 10.33 4/21/2015 60.2 345.1 Avg. 2010- 2015 2720 997 71.43 21.96 2.20 0.31 143.16 154.65 47.26 8.71% 0.42 2.39 N/A 72.8 153.5 MG – Million Gallons MGD – Million Gallons per Day GPCD – Gallons per Capita per Day See Glossary for definitions. A list of Acronyms and Initialisms can be found after the Glossary. 11 Complete Table 3 by listing the top 10 water users by volume, from largest to smallest. For each user, include information about the category of use (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, or wholesale), the amount of water used in gallons per year, the percent of total water delivered, and the status of water conservation measures. Table 3. Large volume users Customer Use Category (Residential, Industrial, Commercial, Institutional, Wholesale) Amount Used (Gallons per Year) Percent of Total Annual Water Delivered Implementing Water Conservation Measures? (Yes/No/Unknown) 1. Commercial 3376000 3.48% Unknown 2. Commercial 2065000 2.13% Unknown 3. Commercial 1659000 1.71% Unknown 4. Commercial 1333000 1.38% Unknown 5. Commercial 1274000 1.31% Unknown 6. Commercial 1126000 1.16% Unknown 7. Commercial 975000 1.01% Unknown 8. Commercial 814000 0.84% Unknown 9. Commercial 813000 0.84% Unknown 10. Commercial 695000 0.72% Unknown B. Treatment and Storage Capacity Complete Table 4 with a description of where water is treated, the year treatment facilities were constructed, water treatment capacity, the treatment methods (i.e. chemical addition, reverse osmosis, coagulation, sedimentation, etc.) and treatment types used (i.e. fluoridation, softening, chlorination, Fe/MN removal, coagulation, etc.). Also describe the annual amount and method of disposal of treatment residuals. Add rows to the table as needed. Table 4. Water treatment capacity and treatment processes Treatment Site ID (Plant Name or Well ID) Year Constructed Treatment Capacity (GPD) Treatment Method Treatment Type Annual Volume of Residuals Disposal Process for Residuals Do You Reclaim Filter Backwash Water? Navarre WTP 1971 1,440,000 Aeration, Sand Filtration, Ion Exchange Softening, Chemical Additions Chlorination, Fluoridation, Polyphosphate addition N/A City Sewer No Highway 12 1991 720,000 Chemical Additions Chlorination & Fluoridation N/A N/A N/A Total N/A 2,160,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A Complete Table 5 with information about storage structures. Describe the type (i.e. elevated, ground, etc.), the storage capacity of each type of structure, the year each structure was constructed, and the primary material for each structure. Add rows to the table as needed. Commented [A1]: City is going to provide actual customer names 12 Table 5. Storage capacity, as of the end of the last calendar year Structure Name Type of Storage Structure Year Constructed Primary Material Storage Capacity (Gallons) Navarre Water Tower Elevated storage 1971 Steel 200,000 Hwy 12 Water Tower Ground storage 1993 Steel 400,000 Total NA NA NA 600,000 Treatment and storage capacity versus demand It is recommended that total storage equal or exceed the average daily demand. Discuss the difference between current storage and treatment capacity versus the water supplier’s projected average water demand over the next 10 years (see Table 7 for projected water demand): The City of Orono currently has 200,000 gallons of elevated storage within their one water tower, and 400,000 gallons of storage within the ground storage tank nearby the Highway 12 water treatment plant. The total storage within the system is 600,000 gallons. Typically, it is desired to maintain a storage capacity greater than the average day demand (based on Ten States Standards). In 2016, the average day demand is projected to be 410,357 gallons per day. Using the Ten States Standards, and comparing the average day demand to total storage capacity, there is a surplus of 189,643 gallons in 2016. By 2040, the average day demand is projected to be 513,000 gallons per day. The system continues to hold a surplus of 87,000 gallons, therefore the water storage system will continue to be adequate for the foreseeable future. There are two water treatment plants servicing the water supply system with a combined capacity of 2,160,000 gallons per day. Typically, water treatment plants are sized to treat the maximum daily demand projected for a community. In 2016, the projected maximum daily demand is projected to be 821,000 gallons per day. By these standards, there is 1,339,000 of capacity left in the treatment plant. By 2040, the projected maximum daily demand is projected to be 1,026,000 gallons per day. The water treatment plants continue to hold a surplus using this projection, and therefore the water treatment system will continue to be adequate for the foreseeable future. C. Water Sources Complete Table 6 by listing all types of water sources that supply water to the system, including groundwater, surface water, interconnections with other water suppliers, or others. Provide the name of each source (aquifer name, river or lake name, name of interconnecting water supplier) and the Minnesota unique well number or intake ID, as appropriate. Report the year the source was installed or established and the current capacity. Provide information about the depth of all wells. Describe the status of the source (active, inactive, emergency only, retail/wholesale interconnection) and if the source facilities have a dedicated emergency power source. Add rows to the table as needed for each installation. Include copies of well records and maintenance summary for each well that has occurred since your last approved plan in Appendix 1. Table 6. Water sources and status Commented [A2]: Need well records from City 13 Resource Type (Groundwater, Surface water, Interconnection) Resource Name MN Unique Well # or Intake ID Year Installed Capacity (Gallons per Minute) Well Depth (Feet) Status of Normal and Emergency Operations (active, inactive, emergency only, retail/wholesale interconnection)) Does this Source have a Dedicated Emergency Power Source? (Yes or No) Groundwater CJDN 205627 1971 1000 385 Active Yes Groundwater QBAA 211965 1971 500 390 Active Yes Groundwater OPCJ 509097 1991 500 381 Active No Groundwater St. Lawrence Not Assigned yet 2016 1,100 365 Active No Interconnection City of Wayzata N/A N/A N/A N/A Active N/A Interconnection City of Long Lake N/A 2003 N/A N/A Active N/A Interconnection City of Medina N/A N/A N/A N/A Active N/A Interconnection City of Long Lake N/A 1994 1100* N/A Emergency Only N/A Interconnection City of Minnetonka Beach N/A 1976 470* N/A Emergency Only N/A Interconnection City of Spring Park N/A 1979 1095* N/A Emergency Only N/A *Limits on Emergency Interconnections Discuss any limitations on the use of the water sources (e.g. not to be operated simultaneously, limitations due to blending, aquifer recovery issues etc.) and the use of interconnections, including capacity limits or timing constraints (i.e. only 200 gallons per minute are available from the City of Prior Lake, and it is estimated to take 6 hours to establish the emergency connection). If there are no limitations, list none. Interconnected with the Navarre System, Minnetonka Beach has a potential capacity of 470 gpm (677,000 GPD) with both wells pumping, which is approximately 417,000 GPD in excess of the record peak day demand for that City. Interconnected with the Navarre System, the Spring Park system has a potential capacity of 1,095 gpm (1.576 MGD) when all three of its wells are pumping. Record peak day demand for the Spring Park system is 607,000 GPD, leaving a potential excess of 969,000 GPD available for export to Orono. Interconnected with the Highway 12 system, the Long Lake water system has a potential capacity of 1,100 gpm (1,584,000 GPD) and a record peak day demand of 954,000 GPD. The record peak day demand for the Highway 12 system is 449,000 GPD. The Long Lake water system has 630,000 GPD excess potential capacity which would provide adequate backup for the Highway 12 system should an emergency occur. D. Future Demand Projections – Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark Water Use Trends Use the data in Table 2 to describe trends in 1) population served; 2) total per capita water demand; 3) average daily demand; 4) maximum daily demand. Then explain the causes for upward or downward trends. For example, over the ten years has the average daily demand trended up or down? Why is this occurring? 14 Population served has increased from 2,260 in 2005 to 2,970 in 2015. This represents an increase of nearly 24%. It is projected that the population served will continue to increase as the total population is projected to increase. The population served is also expected to increase (and has already been increasing) by the efforts of the City expanding the water and sewer infrastructure to reach customers that previously have relied on private wells for the supply of water. The total per capita water demand has been on a downward trend over the last 10 years, even though there has been an increase in the population served. In 2007 the total per capita water demand peaked at a level of 153 gallons per capita per day, by 2014 the level decreased to less than 89 gallons per capita per day. In 2015 there was a dramatic spike (345 gpcd), but this was due to a water leak and a constr uction project, and does not accurately reflect the City’s normal usage. Overall, the trend is decreasing due to the implementation of conservation water rates and other water conservation practices. The average daily demand has been fluctuating over the last 10 years between 0.26 MGD and 0.36 MGD, with no clear trend of increasing or decreasing during this time period. Drought and or years with significant rainfall most likely affected average daily demands. Drought years saw an increase in demand while wet years saw a decrease in demand. As the population increased, the average daily demand has averaged right around 0.30 MGD. Water conservation education and updated rate structures within the City have helped to maintain an average day demand. Max day demand has been on a slight downward trend from a peak of 1.43 MGD in 2008, to a low of 0.74 MGD in 2013. This slight downward trend can be associated with increased water conservation and education efforts within the City. Use the water use trend information discussed above to complete Table 7 with projected annual demand for the next ten years. Communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area must also include projections for 2030 and 2040 as part of their local comprehensive planning. Projected demand should be consistent with trends evident in the historical data in Table 2, as discussed above. Projected demand should also reflect state demographer population projections and/or other planning projections. Table 7. Projected annual water demand Year Projected Total Population Projected Population Served Projected Total Per Capita Water Demand (GPCD) Projected Average Daily Demand (MGD) Projected Maximum Daily Demand (MGD) 2016 7,599 2,736 150 0.410 1.570 2017 7,724 2,781 150 0.417 1.595 2018 7,850 2,826 150 0.424 1.620 2019 7,975 2,871 150 0.431 1.634 2020 8,100 2,916 150 0.437 1.648 2021 8,170 2,941 150 0.441 1.662 2022 8,240 2,966 150 0.445 1.676 2023 8,310 2,992 150 0.449 1.690 2024 8,380 3,017 150 0.453 1.704 2025 8,450 3,042 150 0.456 1.690 2030 8,800 3,168 150 0.475 1.760 2040 9,500 3,420 150 0.513 1.900 15 GPCD – Gallons per Capita per Day MGD – Million Gallons per Day Projection Method Describe the method used to project water demand, including assumptions for population and business growth and how water conservation and efficiency programs affect projected water demand: Population projections were done using the 2015 Met Council System Statement for Orono. Average day demand was projected using the 10 year historic total capacity of 150 gpcd and multiplying that by the projected population served. The max day demand was calculated by taking the average day times a peaking factor of 2.0. E. Resource Sustainability Monitoring – Key DNR Benchmark Complete Table 8 by inserting information about source water quality and quantity monitoring efforts. The list should include all production wells, observation wells, and source water intakes or reservoirs. Groundwater level data for DNR’s statewide network of observation wells are available online through the DNR’s Cooperative Groundwater Monitoring (CGM) webpage. Table 8. Information about source water quality and quantity monitoring MN Unique Well # or Surface Water ID Type of monitoring point Monitoring program Frequency of monitoring Monitoring Method 205627 ☒ production well ☐ observation well ☐ source water intake ☐ source water reservoir ☒ routine MDH sampling ☐ routine water utility sampling ☐ other ☐ continuous ☐ hourly ☐ daily ☐ monthly ☐ quarterly ☒ annually ☐ SCADA ☐ grab sampling ☒ steel tape ☐ stream gauge 211965 ☒ production well ☐ observation well ☐ source water intake ☐ source water reservoir ☒ routine MDH sampling ☐ routine water utility sampling ☐ other ☐ continuous ☐ hourly ☐ daily ☐ monthly ☐ quarterly ☒ annually ☐ SCADA ☐ grab sampling ☒ steel tape ☐ stream gauge 509097 ☒ production well ☐ observation well ☐ source water intake ☐ source water reservoir ☒ routine MDH sampling ☐ routine water utility sampling ☐ other ☐ continuous ☐ hourly ☐ daily ☐ monthly ☐ quarterly ☒ annually ☐ SCADA ☐ grab sampling ☒ steel tape ☐ stream gauge Water Level Data A water level monitoring plan that includes monitoring locations and a schedule for water level readings must be submitted as Appendix 2. If one does not already exist, it needs to be prepared and submitted with the WSP. Ideally, all production and observation wells are monitored at least monthly. 16 Complete Table 9 to summarize water level data for each well being monitored. Provide the name of the aquifer and a brief description of how much water levels vary over the season (the difference between the highest and lowest water levels measured during the year) and the long-term trends for each well. If water levels are not measured and recorded on a routine basis, then provide the static water level when each well was constructed and the most recent water level measured during the same season the well was constructed. Also include all water level data taken during any well and pump maintenance. Add rows to the table as needed. Groundwater hydrographs illustrate the historical record of aquifer water levels measured within a well and can indicate water level trends over time. For each well in your system, provide a hydrograph for the life of the well, or for as many years as water levels have been measured. Include the hydrographs in Appendix 3. An example of a hydrograph can be found on the DNR’s Groundwater Hydrograph webpage. Hydrographs for DNR Observation wells can be found in the CGM discussed above. Table 9. Water level data Unique Well Number or Well ID Aquifer Name Seasonal Variation (Feet) Long-term Trend in water level data Water level measured during well/pumping maintenance 205627 CJDN ☐ Falling ☐ Stable ☐ Rising MM/DD/YY:____ MM/DD/YY:____ MM/DD/YY:____ 211965 QBAA ☐ Falling ☐ Stable ☐ Rising MM/DD/YY:____ MM/DD/YY:____ MM/DD/YY:____ 509097 OPCJ ☐ Falling ☐ Stable ☐ Rising MM/DD/YY:____ MM/DD/YY:____ MM/DD/YY:____ Potential Water Supply Issues & Natural Resource Impacts – Key DNR & Metropolitan Council Benchmark Complete Table 10 by listing the types of natural resources that are or could potentially be impacted by permitted water withdrawals in the future. You do not need to identify every single water resource in your entire community. The goal is to help you triage the most important water resources and/or the water resources that may be impacted by your water supply system – perhaps during a drought or when the population has grown significantly in ten years. This is emerging science, so do the best you can with available data. For identified resources, provide the name of specific resources that may be impacted. Identify what the greatest risks to the resource are and how the risks are being assessed. Identify any resource protection thresholds – formal or informal – that have been established to identify when actions should be taken to mitigate impacts. Provide information about the potential mitigation actions that may be taken, if a resource protection threshold is crossed. Add additional rows to the table as needed. See the glossary at the end of the template for definitions. Commented [A3]: Need info from city Commented [A4]: Need info from city 17 Some of this baseline data should have been in your earlier water supply plans or county comprehensive water plans. When filling out this table, think of what are the water supply risks, identify the resources, determine the threshold and then determine what your community will do to mitigate the impacts. Your DNR area hydrologist is available to assist with this table. For communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area, the Master Water Supply Plan Appendix 1 (Water Supply Profiles), provides information about potential water supply issues and natural resource impacts for your community. Steps for completing Table 10 1. Identify the potential for natural resource impacts/issues within the community First, review available information to identify resources that may be impacted by the operation of your water supply system (such as pumping). Potential Sources of Information:  County Geologic Atlas  Local studies  Metropolitan Council System Statement (for metro communities)  Metropolitan Council Master Water Supply Plan (for metro communities) ACTION: Check the resource type(s) that may be impacted in the column “Resource Type” 2. Identify where your water supply system is most likely to impact those resources (and vice versa). Potential Sources of Information:  Drinking Water Supply Management Areas  Geologic Atlas - Sensitivity  If no WHPA or other information exists, consider rivers, lakes, wetlands and significant within 1.5 miles of wells; and calcareous fens and trout streams within 5 miles of wells ACTION: Focus the rest of your work in these areas. 3. Within focus areas, identify specific features of value to the community You know your community best. What resources are important to pay attention to? It may be useful to check in with your community’s planning and zoning staff and others. Potential Sources of Information:  Park plans  Local studies  Natural resource inventories  Tourist attractions/recreational areas/valued community resource ACTION: Identify specific features that the community prioritizes in the “Resource Name” column (for example: North Lake, Long River, Brook Trout Stream, or Green Fen). If, based on a review of available information, no features are likely to be at risk, note “None”. 18 4. Identify what impact(s) the resource is at risk for Potential Sources of Information:  Wellhead Protection Plan  Water Appropriation Permit  County Geologic Atlas  MDH or PCA reports of the area  Metropolitan Council System Statement (for metro communities)  Metropolitan Council Master Water Supply Plan (for metro communities) ACTION: Check the risk type in the column “Risk”. If, based on a review of available information, no risk is identified, note “None anticipated”. 5. Describe how the risk was assessed Potential Sources of Information:  Local studies  Monitoring data (community, WMO, DNR, etc.)  Aquifer testing  County Geologic Atlas or other hydrogeologic studies  Regional or state studies, such as DNR’s report ‘Definitions and Thresholds for Negative Impacts to Surface Waters’  Well boring logs ACTION: Identify the method(s) used to identify the risk to the resource in the “Risk Assessed Through” column 6. Describe protection threshold/goals What is the goal, if any, for protecting these resources? For example, is there a lower limit on acceptable flow in a river or stream? Water quality outside of an accepted range? A lower limit on acceptable aquifer level decline at one or more monitoring wells? Withdrawals that exceed some percent of the total amount available from a source? Or a lower limit on acceptable changes to a protected habitat? Potential Sources of Information:  County Comprehensive Water Plans  Watershed Plans or One Watershed/One Plan  Groundwater or Aquifer Plans  Metropolitan Master Plans  DNR Thresholds study  Community parks, open space, and natural resource plans ACTION: Describe resource protection goals in the “Describe Resource Protection Threshold” column or reference an existing plan/document/webpage 7. If a goal/threshold should trigger action, describe the plan that will be implemented. Identify specific action, mitigation measures or management plan that the water supplier will implement, or refer to a partner’s plan that includes actions to be taken. 19 Potential Sources of Information:  County Comprehensive Water Plans  Watershed Plans or One Watershed/One Plan  Groundwater or Aquifer Plans  Metropolitan Master Plans  Studies such as DNR Thresholds study ACTION: Describe the mitigation measure or management plan in the “Mitigation Measure or Management Plan” column. 8. Describe work to evaluate these risks going forward. For example, what is the plan to regularly check in to stay current on plans or new data? Identify specific action that the water supplier will take to identify the creation of or change to goals/thresholds, or refer to a partner’s plan that includes actions to be taken. Potential Sources of Information:  County Comprehensive Water Plans  Watershed Plans or One Watershed/One Plan  Groundwater or Aquifer Plans  Metropolitan Master Plans  Studies such as DNR Thresholds study ACTION: Describe what will be done to evaluate risks going forward, including any changes to goals or protection thresholds in the “Describe how Changes to Goals are monitored” column. Table 10. Natural resource impacts (*List specific resources in Appendix 12) Resource Type Resource Name Risk Risk Assessed Through * Describe Resource Protection Threshold or Goal * Mitigation Measures or Management Plan Describe How Thresholds or Goals are Monitored ☒ River or stream Long Lake Creek Painter Creek ☒ None anticipated ☐ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat ☐ Other: ___________ ☐ Geologic atlas or other mapping ☐ Modeling ☐ Modeling ☐ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☐WRAPS or other watershed report ☒Proximity (<1.5 miles) ☐ Other: ___________ ☒ Not applicable ☐ Additional data is needed to establish ☐ See report: ___________ ☐ No data available ☐ Other: ___________ ☒Not applicable ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☐ Increase conservation ☐ Other: ___________ ☒Not applicable ☐ Newly collected data will be analyzed ☐ Regular check-in with these partners: ___________ _ ☐ Other: ___________ 20 Resource Type Resource Name Risk Risk Assessed Through * Describe Resource Protection Threshold or Goal * Mitigation Measures or Management Plan Describe How Thresholds or Goals are Monitored ☒ Calcareous fen ☒ None anticipated ☐ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat ☐ Other: ___________ ☐ Geologic atlas or other mapping ☐ Modeling ☐ Modeling ☐ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☐WRAPS or other watershed Report ☒Proximity (<5 miles) ☐ Other: _________ ☐ Other: ___ ☒ Not applicable ☐ Additional data is needed to establish ☐ See report: ___________ ☐ Other: ___________ ☒Not applicable ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☐ Increase conservation ☐ Other: ___________ ☒Not applicable ☐ Newly collected data will be analyzed ☐ Regular check-in with these partners: ___________ ☐ Other: ___________ ☒ Lake Minnetonka Long Classen ☒ None anticipated ☐ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat ☐ Other: ___________ ☐ Geologic atlas or other mapping ☐ Modeling ☐ Modeling ☐ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☐WRAPS or other watershed report ☒Proximity (<1.5 miles) ☐ Other: _________ ☐ Other: ___ ☒ Not applicable ☐ Additional data is needed to establish ☐ See report: ___________ ☐ Other: ___________ ☒Not applicable ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☐ Increase conservation ☐ Other: ___________ ☒Not applicable ☐ Newly collected data will be analyzed ☐ Regular check-in with these partners: ___________ ☐ Other: ___________ 21 Resource Type Resource Name Risk Risk Assessed Through * Describe Resource Protection Threshold or Goal * Mitigation Measures or Management Plan Describe How Thresholds or Goals are Monitored ☒ Wetland Various ☒ None anticipated ☐ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat ☐ Other: ___________ ☐ Geologic atlas or other mapping ☐ Modeling ☐ Modeling ☐ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☐WRAPS or other watershed report ☒Proximity (<1.5 miles) ☐ Other: _________ ☒ Not applicable ☐ Additional data is needed to establish ☐ See report: ___________ ☐ Other: ___________ ☒Not applicable ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☐ Increase conservation ☐ Other: ___________ ☒Not applicable ☐ Newly collected data will be analyzed ☐ Regular check-in with these partners: ___________ _ ☐ Other: ___________ ☒ Trout stream ☒ None anticipated ☐ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat ☐ Other: ___________ ☐ Geologic atlas or other mapping ☐ Modeling ☐ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☐WRAPS or other watershed report ☒Proximity (< 5 miles) ☐ Other: ___________ ☒ Not applicable ☐ Additional data is needed to establish ☐ See report: ___________ ☐ Other: ___________ ☒Not applicable ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☐ Increase conservation ☐ Other: ___________ ☒Not applicable ☐ Newly collected data will be analyzed ☐ Regular check-in with these partners: ___________ ☐ Other: ___________ 22 Resource Type Resource Name Risk Risk Assessed Through * Describe Resource Protection Threshold or Goal * Mitigation Measures or Management Plan Describe How Thresholds or Goals are Monitored ☒ Aquifer Jordan QBAA PCJA ☒ None anticipated ☐ Flow/water level decline ☐ Degrading water quality trends ☐ Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat ☐ Other: ___________ ☐ Geologic atlas or other mapping ☐ Modeling ☒ Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☐Proximity (obwell < 5 miles) ☐ Other: ___________ ☒ Not applicable ☐ Additional data is needed to establish ☐ See report: ___________ ☐ Other: ___________ ☒Not applicable ☐ Change groundwater pumping ☐ Increase conservation ☐ Other: ___________ ☒Not applicable ☐ Newly collected data will be analyzed ☐ Regular check-in with these partners: ___________ ☐ Other: ___________ Wellhead Protection (WHP) and Source Water Protection (SWP) Plans Complete Table 11 to provide status information about WHP and SWP plans. The emergency procedures in this plan are intended to comply with the contingency plan provisions required in the Minnesota Department of Health’s (MDH) Wellhead Protection (WHP) Plan and Surface Water Protection (SWP) Plan. 23 Table 11. Status of Wellhead Protection and Source Water Protection Plans Plan Type Status Date Adopted Date for Update WHP ☐ In Process ☒ Completed ☐ Not Applicable October, 2013 2022 SWP ☐ In Process ☐ Completed ☒ Not Applicable WHP – Wellhead Protection Plan SWP – Source Water Protection Plan F. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Please note that any wells that received approval under a ten-year permit, but that were not built, are now expired and must submit a water appropriations permit. Adequacy of Water Supply System Complete Table 12 with information about the adequacy of wells and/or intakes, storage facilities, treatment facilities, and distribution systems to sustain current and projected demands. List planned capital improvements for any system components, in chronological order. Communities in the seven- county Twin Cities metropolitan area should also include information about plans through 2040. The assessment can be the general status by category; it is not necessary to identify every single well, storage facility, treatment facility, lift station, and mile of pipe. Please attach your latest Capital Improvement Plan as Appendix 4. Table 12. Adequacy of Water Supply System System Component Planned action Anticipated Construction Year Notes Wells/Intakes ☒ No action planned - adequate ☐ Repair/replacement ☐ Expansion/addition Water Storage Facilities ☒ No action planned - adequate ☐ Repair/replacement ☐ Expansion/addition Water Treatment Facilities ☒ No action planned - adequate ☐ Repair/replacement ☐ Expansion/addition Distribution Systems (Pipes, valves, etc.) ☐ No action planned - adequate ☒ Repair/replacement ☐ Expansion/addition Repair as needed Pressure Zones ☒ No action planned - adequate ☐ Repair/replacement ☐ Expansion/addition 24 Proposed Future Water Sources Complete Table 13 to identify new water source installation planned over the next ten years. Add rows to the table as needed. Table 13. Proposed future installations/sources Source Installation Location (approximate) Resource Name Proposed Pumping Capacity (gpm) Planned Installation Year Planned Partnerships None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Water Source Alternatives - Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark Do you anticipate the need for alternative water sources in the next 10 years? Yes ☐ No ☒ For metro communities, will you need alternative water sources by the year 2040? Yes ☐ No ☒ If you answered yes for either question, then complete table 14. If no, insert NA. Complete Table 14 by checking the box next to alternative approaches that your community is considering, including approximate locations (if known), the estimated amount of future demand that could be met through the approach, the estimated timeframe to implement the approach, potential partnerships, and the major benefits and challenges of the approach. Add rows to the table as needed. For communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area, these alternatives should include approaches the community is considering to meet projected 2040 water demand. Table 14. Alternative water sources Alternative Source Considered Source and/or Installation Location (approximate) Estimated Amount of Future Demand (%) Timeframe to Implement (YYYY) Potential Partners Benefits Challenges None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A PART 2. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROCEDURES The emergency preparedness procedures outlined in this plan are intended to comply with the contingency plan provisions required by MDH in the WHP and SWP. Water emergencies can occur as a result of vandalism, sabotage, accidental contamination, mechanical problems, power failings, drought, flooding, and other natural disasters. The purpose of emergency planning is to develop emergency response procedures and to identify actions needed to improve emergency preparedness. In the case of a municipality, these procedures should be in support of, and part of, an all-hazard emergency operations plan. Municipalities that already have written procedures dealing with water emergencies should review the following information and update existing procedures to address these water supply protection measures. 25 A. Emergency Response Plan Section 1433(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Act, (Public Law 107-188, Title IV- Drinking Water Security and Safety) requires community water suppliers serving over 3,300 people to prepare an Emergency Response Plan. MDH recommends that Emergency Response Plans are updated annually. Do you have an Emergency Response Plan? Yes ☒ No ☐ Have you updated the Emergency Response Plan in the last year? Yes ☐ No ☒ When did you last update your Emergency Response Plan? February 2014 Complete Table 15 by inserting the noted information regarding your completed Emergency Response Plan. Table 15. Emergency Response Plan contact information Emergency Response Plan Role Contact Person Contact Phone Number Contact Email Emergency Response Lead Alternate Emergency Response Lead B. Operational Contingency Plan All utilities should have a written operational contingency plan that describes measures to be taken for water supply mainline breaks and other common system failures as well as routine maintenance. Do you have a written operational contingency plan? Yes ☒ No ☐ At a minimum, a water supplier should prepare and maintain an emergency contact list of contractors and suppliers. C. Emergency Response Procedures Water suppliers must meet the requirements of MN Rules 4720.5280. Accordingly, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) requires public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people to submit Emergency and Conservation Plans. Water emergency and conservation plans that have been approved by the DNR, under provisions of Minnesota Statute 186 and Minnesota Rules, part 6115.0770, will be considered equivalent to an approved WHP contingency plan. Emergency Telephone List Prepare and attach a list of emergency contacts, including the MN Duty Officer (1-800-422-0798), as Appendix 5. An Emergency Contact List template is available at the MnDNR Water Supply Plans webpage. The list should include key utility and community personnel, contacts in adjacent water suppliers, and appropriate local, state and federal emergency contacts. Please be sure to verify and update the contacts on the emergency telephone list and date it. Thereafter, update on a regular basis (once a year is recommended). In the case of a municipality, this information should be contained in a notification Commented [A5]: Need from City 26 and warning standard operating procedure maintained by the Emergency Manager for that community. Responsibilities and services for each contact should be defined. Current Water Sources and Service Area Quick access to concise and detailed information on water sources, water treatment, and the distribution system may be needed in an emergency. System operation and maintenance records should be maintained in secured central and back-up locations so that the records are accessible for emergency purposes. A detailed map of the system showing the treatment plants, water sources, storage facilities, supply lines, interconnections, and other information that would be useful in an emergency should also be readily available. It is critical that public water supplier representatives and emergency response personnel communicate about the response procedures and be able to easily obtain this kind of information both in electronic and hard copy formats (in case of a power outage). Do records and maps exist? Yes ☒ No ☐ Can staff access records and maps from a central secured location in the event of an emergency? Yes ☒ No ☐ Does the appropriate staff know where the materials are located? Yes ☒ No ☐ Procedure for Augmenting Water Supplies Complete Tables 16 – 17 by listing all available sources of water that can be used to augment or replace existing sources in an emergency. Add rows to the tables as needed. In the case of a municipality, this information should be contained in a notification and warning standard operating procedure maintained by the warning point for that community. Municipalities are encouraged to execute cooperative agreements for potential emergency water services and copies should be included in Appendix 6. Outstate Communities may consider using nearby high capacity wells (industry, golf course) as emergency water sources. WSP should include information on any physical or chemical problems that may limit interconnections to other sources of water. Approvals from the MDH are required for interconnections or the reuse of water. Table 16. Interconnections with other water supply systems to supply water in an emergency Other Water Supply System Owner Capacity (GPM & MGD) Note Any Limitations On Use List of services, equipment, supplies available to respond City of Minnetonka Beach 470 GPM, 0.677 MGD 417,000 GPD. SEE AGREEMENT. WATER SUPPLY City of Spring Park 1095 GPM, 1.576 MGD 969,000 GPD. SEE AGREEMENT WATER SUPPLY 27 Other Water Supply System Owner Capacity (GPM & MGD) Note Any Limitations On Use List of services, equipment, supplies available to respond City of Long Lake 1,100 GPM, 1.584 MGD 630,000 GPD. SEE AGREEMENT WATER SUPPLY GPM – Gallons per minute MGD – million gallons per day Table 17. Utilizing surface water as an alternative source Surface Water Source Name Capacity (GPM) Capacity (MGD) Treatment Needs Note Any Limitations On Use None If not covered above, describe additional emergency measures for providing water (obtaining bottled water, or steps to obtain National Guard services, etc.) Allocation and Demand Reduction Procedures Complete Table 18 by adding information about how decisions will be made to allocate water and reduce demand during an emergency. Provide information for each customer category, including its priority ranking, average day demand, and demand reduction potential for each customer category. Modify the customer categories as needed, and add additional lines if necessary. Water use categories should be prioritized in a way that is consistent with Minnesota Statutes 103G.261 (#1 is highest priority) as follows: 1. Water use for human needs such as cooking, cleaning, drinking, washing and waste disposal; use for on-farm livestock watering; and use for power production that meets contingency requirements. 2. Water use involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons per day (usually from private wells or surface water intakes) 3. Water use for agricultural irrigation and processing of agricultural products involving consumption of more than 10,000 gallons per day (usually from private high-capacity wells or surface water intakes) 4. Water use for power production above the use provided for in the contingency plan. 5. All other water use involving consumption of more than 10,000 gallons per day. 6. Nonessential uses – car washes, golf courses, etc. Water used for human needs at hospitals, nursing homes and similar types of facilities should be designated as a high priority to be maintained in an emergency. Lower priority uses will need to address water used for human needs at other types of facilities such as hotels, office buildings, and manufacturing plants. The volume of water and other types of water uses at these facilities must be carefully considered. After reviewing the data, common sense should dictate local allocation priorities to 28 protect domestic requirements over certain types of economic needs. Water use for lawn sprinkling, vehicle washing, golf courses, and recreation are legislatively considered non-essential. Table 18. Water use priorities Customer Category Allocation Priority Average Daily Demand (GDP) Short-Term Emergency Demand Reduction Potential (GPD) Residential 1 178,000 75,000 C/I/I 2 46,000 25,000 Wholesale 3 1,800 1,800 Non-Essential 4 100,000 100,000 TOTAL NA NA 201,800 GPD – Gallons per Day Tip: Calculating Emergency Demand Reduction Potential The emergency demand reduction potential for all uses will typically equal the difference between maximum use (summer demand) and base use (winter demand). In extreme emergency situations, lower priority water uses must be restricted or eliminated to protect priority domestic water requirements. Emergency demand reduction potential should be based on average day demands for customer categories within each priority class. Use the tables in Part 3 on water conservation to help you determine strategies. Complete Table 19 by selecting the triggers and actions during water supply disruption conditions. 29 Table 19. Emergency demand reduction conditions, triggers and actions (Select all that may apply and describe) Emergency Triggers Short-term Actions Long-term Actions ☒ Contamination ☒ Loss of production ☒ Infrastructure failure ☒ Executive order by Governor ☐ Other: _____________ ☒ Supply augmentation through Interconnections ☒ Enforce the critical water deficiency ordinance to penalize lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses. ☒ Water allocation per Minnesota Statute 103G.261 ☐ Meet with large water users to discuss their contingency plan. ☒ Supply augmentation through Interconnections ☒ Enforce the critical water deficiency ordinance to penalize lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses. ☐ Water allocation per Minnesota Statute 103G.261 ☐ Meet with large water users to discuss their contingency plan. Notification Procedures Complete Table 20 by selecting trigger for informing customers regarding conservation requests, water use restrictions, and suspensions; notification frequencies; and partners that may assist in the notification process. Add rows to the table as needed. Table 20. Plan to inform customers regarding conservation requests, water use restrictions, and suspensions Notification Trigger(s) Methods (select all that apply) Update Frequency Partners ☒ Short-term demand reduction declared (< 1 year) ☒ Website ☐ Email list serve ☒ Social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) ☒ Direct customer mailing, ☒ Press release (TV, radio, newspaper), ☐ Meeting with large water users (> 10% of total city use) ☐ Other: ________ ☐ Daily ☐ Weekly ☐ Monthly ☐ Annually ☒ As Needed ☒ Long-term Ongoing demand reduction declared ☒ Website ☐ Email list serve ☒ Social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) ☒ Direct customer mailing, ☒ Press release (TV, radio, newspaper), ☐ Meeting with large water users (> 10% of total city use) ☐ Other: ________ ☐ Daily ☐ Weekly ☐ Monthly ☐ Annually ☒ As Needed ☒ Governor’s critical water deficiency declared ☒ Website ☐ Email list serve ☒ Social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) ☒ Direct customer mailing, ☐ Daily ☐ Weekly ☐ Monthly ☐ Annually ☐ As Needed 30 Notification Trigger(s) Methods (select all that apply) Update Frequency Partners ☒ Press release (TV, radio, newspaper), ☐ Meeting with large water users (> 10% of total city use) ☐ Other: ________ Enforcement Prior to a water emergency, municipal water suppliers must adopt regulations that restrict water use and outline the enforcement response plan. The enforcement response plan must outline how conditions will be monitored to know when enforcement actions are triggered, what enforcement tools will be used, who will be responsible for enforcement, and what timelines for corrective actions will be expected. Affected operations, communications, and enforcement staff must then be trained to rapidly implement those provisions during emergency conditions. Important Note: Disregard of critical water deficiency orders, even though total appropriation remains less than permitted, is adequate grounds for immediate modification of a public water supply authority’s water use permit (2013 MN Statutes 103G.291) Does the city have a critical water deficiency restriction/official control in place that includes provisions to restrict water use and enforce the restrictions? (This restriction may be an ordinance, rule, regulation, policy under a council directive, or other official control) Yes ☒ No ☐ If yes, attach the official control document to this WSP as Appendix 7. If no, the municipality must adopt such an official control within 6 months of submitting this WSP and submit it to the DNR as an amendment to this WSP. Irrespective of whether a critical water deficiency control is in place, does the public water supply utility, city manager, mayor, or emergency manager have standing authority to implement water restrictions? Yes ☒ No ☐ If yes, cite the regulatory authority reference: Sec. 14-136 & Sec. 14-137. If no, who has authority to implement water use restrictions in an emergency? 31 PART 3. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN Minnesotans have historically benefited from the state’s abundant water supplies, reducing the need for conservation. There are however, limits to the available supplies of water and increasing threats to the quality of our drinking water. Causes of water supply limitation may include: population increases, economic trends, uneven statewide availability of groundwater, climatic changes, and degraded water quality. Examples of threats to drinking water quality include: the presence of contaminant plumes from past land use activities, exceedances of water quality standards from natural and human sources, contaminants of emerging concern, and increasing pollutant trends from nonpoint sources. There are many incentives for conserving water; conservation:  reduces the potential for pumping-induced transfer of contaminants into the deeper aquifers, which can add treatment costs  reduces the need for capital projects to expand system capacity  reduces the likelihood of water use conflicts, like well interference, aquatic habitat loss, and declining lake levels  conserves energy, because less energy is needed to extract, treat and distribute water (and less energy production also conserves water since water is used to produce energy)  maintains water supplies that can then be available during times of drought It is therefore imperative that water suppliers implement water conservation plans. The first step in water conservation is identifying opportunities for behavioral or engineering changes that could be made to reduce water use by conducting a thorough analysis of:  Water use by customer  Extraction, treatment, distribution and irrigation system efficiencies  Industrial processing system efficiencies  Regulatory and barriers to conservation  Cultural barriers to conservation  Water reuse opportunities Once accurate data is compiled, water suppliers can set achievable goals for reducing water use. A successful water conservation plan follows a logical sequence of events. The plan should address both conservation on the supply side (leak detection and repairs, metering), as well as on the demand side (reductions in usage). Implementation should be conducted in phases, starting with the most obvious and lowest-cost options. In some cases, one of the early steps will be reviewing regulatory constraints to water conservation, such as lawn irrigation requirements. Outside funding and grants may be available for implementation of projects. Engage water system operators and maintenance staff and customers in brainstorming opportunities to reduce water use. Ask the question: “How can I help save water?” Progress since 2006 Is this your community’s first Water Supply Plan? Yes ☐ No ☒ Priority 1: Significant water reduction; low cost Priority 2: Slight water reduction, low costs (low hanging fruit) Priority 2: Significant water reduction; significant costs Priority 3: Slight water reduction, significant costs (do only if necessary) 32 If yes, describe conservation practices that you are already implementing, such as: pricing, system improvements, education, regulation, appliance retrofitting, enforcement, etc. If no, complete Table 21 to summarize conservation actions taken since the adoption of the 2006 water supply plan. Table 21. Implementation of previous ten-year Conservation Plan 2006 Plan Commitments Action Taken? Change water rates structure to provide conservation pricing ☒ Yes ☐ No Water supply system improvements (e.g. leak repairs, valve replacements, etc.) ☒ Yes ☐ No Educational efforts ☒ Yes ☐ No New water conservation ordinances ☒ Yes ☐ No Rebate or retrofitting Program (e.g. for toilet, faucets, appliances, showerheads, dish washers, washing machines, irrigation systems, rain barrels, water softeners, etc. ☐ Yes ☒ No Enforcement ☒ Yes ☐ No Describe other ☐ Yes ☐ No What are the results you have seen from the actions in Table 21 and how were results measured? An overall reduction in Residential and Total GPCD since 2006. Unaccounted water has also dropped significantly since 2007. A. Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions Complete table 22 by checking each trigger below, as appropriate, and the actions to be taken at various levels or stages of severity. Add in additional rows to the table as needed. 33 Table 22. Short and long-term demand reduction conditions, triggers and actions Objective Triggers Actions Protect surface water flows ☐ Low stream flow conditions ☐ Reports of declining wetland and lake levels ☐ Other: ______________ ☐ Increase promotion of conservation measures ☐ Other: ____________ Short-term demand reduction (less than 1 year ☒ Extremely high seasonal water demand (more than double winter demand) ☐ Loss of treatment capacity ☐ Lack of water in storage ☒ State drought plan ☒ Well interference ☐ Other: ___________________ ☒ Adopt (if not already) and enforce the critical water deficiency ordinance to restrict or prohibit lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses. ☒ Supply augmentation through interconnections ☒ Water allocation through Minnesota Statute 103G.261 ☐ Meet with large water users to discuss user’s contingency plan. Long-term demand reduction (>1 year) ☒ Per capita demand increasing ☐ Total demand increase (higher population or more industry). ☐ Other: _____________ ☒ Develop a critical water deficiency ordinance that is or can be quickly adopted to penalize lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses. ☒ Enact a water waste ordinance that targets overwatering (causing water to flow off the landscape into streets, parking lots, or similar), watering impervious surfaces (streets, driveways or other hardscape areas), and negligence of known leaks, breaks, or malfunctions. ☐ Meet with large water users to discuss user’s contingency plan. ☐ Enhanced monitoring and reporting: audits, meters, billing, etc. Governor’s “Critical Water Deficiency Order” declared ☐ Describe ☐ Describe B. Conservation Objectives and Strategies – Key benchmark for DNR This section establishes water conservation objectives and strategies for eight major areas of water use. Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non-Revenue) Water loss to Less than 10% The Minnesota Rural Water Association, the Metropolitan Council and the Department of Natural Resources recommend that all water uses be metered. Metering can help identify high use locations and times, along with leaks within buildings that have multiple meters. It is difficult to quantify specific unmetered water use such as that associated with firefighting and system flushing or system leaks. Typically, water suppliers subtract metered water use from total water pumped to calculate unaccounted or non-revenue water loss. 34 Is your five-year average (2005-2014) unaccounted Water Use in Table 2 higher than 10%? Yes ☐ No ☒ What is your leak detection monitoring schedule? (e.g. Monitor 1/3rd of the city lines per year) Leak detection, maintenance and repair is an ongoing process as system problems are identified through a process of water auditing. Water Audits - are designed to help quantify and track water losses associated with water distribution systems and identify areas for improved efficiency and cost recovery. The American Water Works Association (AWWA) has a recommended water audit methodology which is presented in AWWA’s M36 Manual of Water Supply Practices: Water Audits and Loss Control Programs. AWWA also provides a free spreadsheet-based water audit tool that water suppliers can use to conduct their own water audits. This free water audit tool can be found on AWWA’s Water Loss Control webpage. Another resource for water audit and water loss control information is Minnesota Rural Water Association. What is the date of your most recent water audit? 2017 Frequency of water audits: ☒ yearly ☐ other (specify frequency) ________ Leak detection and survey: ☒ every year ☐ every other year ☐ periodic as needed Year last leak detection survey completed: 2017 If Table 2 shows annual water losses over 10% or an increasing trend over time, describe what actions will be taken to reach the <10% loss objective and within what timeframe N/A Metering -AWWA recommends that every water supplier install meters to account for all water taken into its system, along with all water distributed from its system at each customer’s point of service. An effective metering program relies upon periodic performance testing, repair, maintenance or replacement of all meters. Drinking Water Revolving Loan Funds are available for purchase of new meters when new plants are built. AWWA also recommends that water suppliers conduct regular water audits to account for unmetered unbilled consumption, metered unbilled consumption and source water and customer metering inaccuracies. Some cities install separate meters for interior and exterior water use, but some research suggests that this may not result in water conservation. Complete Table 23 by adding the requested information regarding the number, types, testing and maintenance of customer meters. 35 Table 23. Information about customer meters Customer Category Number of Customers Number of Metered Connections Number of Automated Meter Readers Meter testing intervals (years) Average age/meter replacement schedule (years Residential 975 965 965 As Needed 7.5/ 15 Irrigation meters 0 10 10 As Needed 7.5 / 15 Commercial 62 62 62 As Needed 7.5 / 15 TOTALS 1037 1037 1037 NA NA For unmetered systems, describe any plans to install meters or replace current meters with advanced technology meters. Provide an estimate of the cost to implement the plan and the projected water savings from implementing the plan. Table 24. Water source meters Number of Meters Meter testing schedule (years) Number of Automated Meter Readers Average age/meter replacement schedule (years Water source (wells/intakes) 3 As Needed 3 4 / As Needed Treatment plant 3 As Needed 3 4 / As Needed Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD) The 2002 average residential per capita demand in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area was 75 gallons per capita per day. Is your average 2010-2015 residential per capita water demand in Table 2 more than 75? Yes ☐ No ☒ What was your 2010 – 2015 five-year average residential per capita water demand? 73 g/person/day Describe the water use trend over that timeframe: The average residential per capita water demand has been on a downward trend since a high of 93.4 gpcd in 2006 to a low of 60.2 gpcd in 2015. Complete Table 25 by checking which strategies you will use to continue reducing residential per capita demand and project a likely timeframe for completing each checked strategy (Select all that apply and add rows for additional strategies): Table 25. Strategies and timeframe to reduce residential per capita demand Strategy to reduce residential per capita demand Timeframe for completing work ☐ Revise city ordinances/codes to encourage or require water efficient landscaping. 36 Strategy to reduce residential per capita demand Timeframe for completing work ☐ Revise city ordinance/codes to permit water reuse options, especially for non-potable purposes like irrigation, groundwater recharge, and industrial use. Check with plumbing authority to see if internal buildings reuse is permitted ☐ Revise ordinances to limit irrigation. Describe the restricted irrigation plan: ☐ Revise outdoor irrigation installations codes to require high efficiency systems (e.g. those with soil moisture sensors or programmable watering areas) in new installations or system replacements. ☒ Make water system infrastructure improvements As needed, and per CIP ☐ Offer free or reduced cost water use audits) for residential customers. ☐ Implement a notification system to inform customers when water availability conditions change. ☐ Provide rebates or incentives for installing water efficient appliances and/or fixtures indoors (e.g., low flow toilets, high efficiency dish washers and washing machines, showerhead and faucet aerators, water softeners, etc.) ☐ Provide rebates or incentives to reduce outdoor water use (e.g., turf replacement/reduction, rain gardens, rain barrels, smart irrigation, outdoor water use meters, etc.) ☐ Identify supplemental Water Resources ☒ Conduct audience-appropriate water conservation education and outreach. The City will continue to provide residents information pamphlets via newsletter and social media as such pamphlets become available from the DNR and MDH. ☐ Describe other plans Objective 3: Achieve at least 1.5% annual reduction in non-residential per capita water use (For each of the next ten years, or a 15% total reduction over ten years.) This includes commercial, institutional, industrial and agricultural water users. Complete Table 26 by checking which strategies you will used to continue reducing non-residential customer use demand and project a likely timeframe for completing each checked strategy (add rows for additional strategies). Where possible, substitute recycled water used in one process for reuse in another. (For example, spent rinse water can often be reused in a cooling tower.) Keep in mind the true cost of water is the amount on the water bill PLUS the expenses to heat, cool, treat, pump, and dispose of/discharge the water. Don’t just calculate the initial investment. Many conservation retrofits that appear to be prohibitively expensive are actually very cost-effective when amortized over the life of the equipment. Often reducing water use also saves electrical and other utility costs. Note: as of 2015, water reuse, and is not allowed by the state plumbing code, M.R. 4715 (a variance is needed). However, several state agencies are addressing this issue. 37 Table 26. Strategies and timeframe to reduce institutional, commercial industrial, and agricultural and non-revenue use demand Strategy to reduce total business, industry, agricultural demand Timeframe for completing work ☐ Conduct a facility water use audit for both indoor and outdoor use, including system components ☐ Install enhanced meters capable of automated readings to detect spikes in consumption ☐ Compare facility water use to related industry benchmarks, if available (e.g., meat processing, dairy, fruit and vegetable, beverage, textiles, paper/pulp, metals, technology, petroleum refining etc.) ☐ Install water conservation fixtures and appliances or change processes to conserve water ☐ Repair leaking system components (e.g., pipes, valves) ☐ Investigate the reuse of reclaimed water (e.g., stormwater, wastewater effluent, process wastewater, etc.) ☐ Reduce outdoor water use (e.g., turf replacement/reduction, rain gardens, rain barrels, smart irrigation, outdoor water use meters, etc.) ☐ Train employees how to conserve water ☐ Implement a notification system to inform non-residential customers when water availability conditions change. ☐ Nonpotable rainwater catchment systems intended to supply uses such as water closets, urinals, trap primers for floor drains and floor sinks, industrial processes, water features, vehicle washing facilities, cooling tower makeup, and similar uses shall be approved by the commissioner. Plumbing code 4714.1702, Published October 31, 2016 ☒ Describe other plans: The City will continue to provide residents information pamphlets via newsletter and social media as such pamphlets become available from the DNR and MDH. There is very little C/I/I or Ag water usage within the City of Orono. Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand Include as Appendix 8 one graph showing total per capita water demand for each customer category (i.e., residential, institutional, commercial, industrial) from 2005-2014 and add the calculated/estimated linear trend for the next 10 years. Describe the trend for each customer category; explain the reason(s) for the trends, and where trends are increasing. The Residential per capita water demand has been trending downward since 2005, with a years of spikes within the data. These spikes can likely be attributed to years with less rainfall, which leads to greater irrigation use within the residential sector. It is likely that the trend will continue downward as time progresses due to increased education about water use and a recently revised water rate structure. 38 The C/I/I per capita water demand appears to be trending downward overall with various spikes and fluctuations throughout the years. These sometimes large fluctuations can be attributed to the smaller and ever changing client base that is present in the City within the C/I/I category. Objective 5: Reduce Ratio of Maximum day (peak day) to the Average Day Demand to Less Than 2.6 Is the ratio of average 2005-2014 maximum day demand to average 2005-2014 average day demand reported in Table 2 more than 2.6? Yes ☒ No ☐ Calculate a ten-year average (2005 – 2014) of the ratio of maximum day demand to average day demand: 4.8 The position of the DNR has been that a peak day/average day ratio that is above 2.6 for in summer indicates that the water being used for irrigation by the residents in a community is too large and that efforts should be made to reduce the peak day use by the community. It should be noted that by reducing the peak day use, communities can also reduce the amount of infrastructure that is required to meet the peak day use. This infrastructure includes new wells, new water towers which can be costly items. Objective 6: Implement Demand Reduction Measures Water Conservation Program Municipal water suppliers serving over 1,000 people are required to adopt demand reduction measures that include a conservation rate structure, or a uniform rate structure with a conservation program that achieves demand reduction. These measures must achieve demand reduction in ways that reduce water demand, water losses, peak water demands, and nonessential water uses. These measures must be approved before a community may request well construction approval from the Department of Health or before requesting an increase in water appropriations permit volume (Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.291, subd. 3 and 4). Rates should be adjusted on a regular basis to ensure that revenue of the system is adequate under reduced demand scenarios. If a municipal water supplier intends to use a Uniform Rate Structure, a community-wide Water Conservation Program that will achieve demand reduction must be provided. Current Water Rates Include a copy of the actual rate structure in Appendix 9 or list current water rates including base/service fees and volume charges below. Volume included in base rate or service charge: 0 gallons Frequency of billing: ☐ Monthly ☐ Bimonthly ☒ Quarterly ☐ Other: _________________ Water Rate Evaluation Frequency: ☒ every year ☐ every ___ years ☐ no schedule Date of last rate change: 12/19/2016 39 Table 27. Rate structures for each customer category (Select all that apply and add additional rows as needed) Customer Category Conservation Billing Strategies in Use * Conservation Neutral Billing Strategies in Use ** Non-Conserving Billing Strategies in Use *** Residential ☐ Monthly billing ☒ Increasing block rates (volume tiered rates) ☐ Seasonal rates ☐ Time of use rates ☒ Water bills reported in gallons ☐ Individualized goal rates ☐ Excess use rates ☐ Drought surcharge ☐ Use water bill to provide comparisons ☐ Service charge not based on water volume ☐ Other (describe) ☐ Uniform ☐ Odd/even day watering ☐ Service charge based on water volume ☐ Declining block ☐ Flat ☐ Other (describe) Commercial/ Industrial/ Institutional ☒ Monthly billing ☒ Increasing block rates (volume tiered rates) ☐ Seasonal rates ☐ Time of use rates ☒ Water bills reported in gallons ☐ Individualized goal rates ☐ Excess use rates ☐ Drought surcharge ☐ Use water bill to provide comparisons ☐ Service charge not based on water volume ☐ Other (describe) ☐ Uniform ☐ Service charge based on water volume ☐ Declining block ☐ Flat ☐ Other (describe) ☐ Other * Rate Structures components that may promote water conservation:  Monthly billing: is encouraged to help people see their water usage so they can consider changing behavior.  Increasing block rates (also known as a tiered residential rate structure): Typically, these have at least three tiers: should have at least three tiers. o The first tier is for the winter average water use. o The second tier is the year-round average use, which is lower than typical summer use. This rate should be set to cover the full cost of service. o The third tier should be above the average annual use and should be priced high enough to encourage conservation, as should any higher tiers. For this to be effective, the difference in block rates should be significant.  Seasonal rate: higher rates in summer to reduce peak demands  Time of Use rates: lower rates for off peak water use  Bill water use in gallons: this allows customers to compare their use to average rates 40  Individualized goal rates: typically used for industry, business or other large water users to promote water conservation if they keep within agreed upon goals. Excess Use rates: if water use goes above an agreed upon amount this higher rate is charged  Drought surcharge: an extra fee is charged for guaranteed water use during drought  Use water bill to provide comparisons: simple graphics comparing individual use over time or compare individual use to others.  Service charge or base fee that does not include a water volume – a base charge or fee to cover universal city expenses that are not customer dependent and/or to provide minimal water at a lower rate (e.g., an amount less than the average residential per capita demand for the water supplier for the last 5 years)  Emergency rates -A community may have a separate conservation rate that only goes into effect when the community or governor declares a drought emergency. These higher rates can help to protect the city budgets during times of significantly less water usage. **Conservation Neutral**  Uniform rate: rate per unit used is the same regardless of the volume used  Odd/even day watering –This approach reduces peak demand on a daily basis for system operation, but it does not reduce overall water use. *** Non-Conserving ***  Service charge or base fee with water volume: an amount of water larger than the average residential per capita demand for the water supplier for the last 5 years  Declining block rate: the rate per unit used decreases as water use increases.  Flat rate: one fee regardless of how much water is used (usually unmetered). Provide justification for any conservation neutral or non-conserving rate structures. If intending to adopt a conservation rate structure, include the timeframe to do so: Objective 7: Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use and Support Wellhead Protection Planning Development and redevelopment projects can provide additional water conservation opportunities, such as the actions listed below. If a Uniform Rate Structure is in place, the water supplier must provide a Water Conservation Program that includes at least two of the actions listed below. Check those actions that you intent to implement within the next 10 years. Table 28. Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use & Support Wellhead Protection ☐ Participate in the GreenStep Cities Program, including implementation of at least one of the 20 “Best Practices” for water ☐ Prepare a master plan for smart growth (compact urban growth that avoids sprawl) ☐ Prepare a comprehensive open space plan (areas for parks, green spaces, natural areas) ☐ Adopt a water use restriction ordinance (lawn irrigation, car washing, pools, etc.) ☐ Adopt an outdoor lawn irrigation ordinance ☐ Adopt a private well ordinance (private wells in a city must comply with water restrictions) ☐ Implement a stormwater management program ☐ Adopt non-zoning wetlands ordinance (can further protect wetlands beyond state/federal laws- for vernal pools, buffer areas, restrictions on filling or alterations) ☐ Adopt a water offset program (primarily for new development or expansion) 41 ☐ Implement a water conservation outreach program ☐ Hire a water conservation coordinator (part-time) ☐ Implement a rebate program for water efficient appliances, fixtures, or outdoor water management ☐ Other Objective 8: Tracking Success: How will you track or measure success through the next ten years? The City will continue to monitor water usage as normal. Currently the water usage within the City is trending in the right direction, however if this changes, the City will need to re-evaluate their processes. Tip: The process to monitor demand reduction and/or a rate structure includes: a) The DNR Hydrologist will call or visit the community the first 1-3 years after the water supply plan is completed. b) They will discuss what activities the community is doing to conserve water and if they feel their actions are successful. The Water Supply Plan, Part 3 tables and responses will guide the discussion. For example, they will discuss efforts to reduce unaccounted for water loss if that is a problem, or go through Tables 33, 34 and 35 to discuss new initiatives. c) The city representative and the hydrologist will discuss total per capita water use, residential per capita water use, and business/industry use. They will note trends. d) They will also discuss options for improvement and/or collect case studies of success stories to share with other communities. One option may be to change the rate structure, but there are many other paths to successful water conservation. e) If appropriate, they will cooperatively develop a simple work plan for the next few years, targeting a couple areas where the city might focus efforts. C. Regulation Complete Table 29 by selecting which regulations are used to reduce demand and improve water efficiencies. Add additional rows as needed. Copies of adopted regulations or proposed restrictions or should be included in Appendix 10 (a list with hyperlinks is acceptable). Table 29. Regulations for short-term reductions in demand and long-term improvements in water efficiencies Regulations Utilized When is it applied (in effect)? ☐ Rainfall sensors required on landscape irrigation systems ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared Emergencies ☒ Water efficient plumbing fixtures required ☒ New development ☐ Replacement ☐ Rebate Programs ☒ Critical/Emergency Water Deficiency ordinance ☒ Only during declared Emergencies ☐ Watering restriction requirements (time of day, allowable days, etc.) ☐ Odd/even ☐ 2 days/week ☐ Only during declared Emergencies ☐ Water waste prohibited (for example, having a fine for irrigators spraying on the street) ☐ Ongoing 42 Regulations Utilized When is it applied (in effect)? ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared Emergencies ☐ Limitations on turf areas (requiring lots to have 10% - 25% of the space in natural areas) ☐ New development ☐ Shoreland/zoning ☐ Other ☐ Soil preparation requirement s (after construction, requiring topsoil to be applied to promote good root growth) ☐ New Development ☐ Construction Projects ☐ Other ☐ Tree ratios (requiring a certain number of trees per square foot of lawn) ☐ New development ☐ Shoreland/zoning ☐ Other ☐ Permit to fill swimming pool and/or requiring pools to be covered (to prevent evaporation) ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared Emergencies ☐ Ordinances that permit stormwater irrigation, reuse of water, or other alternative water use (Note: be sure to check current plumbing codes for updates) ☐ Describe D. Retrofitting Programs Education and incentive programs aimed at replacing inefficient plumbing fixtures and appliances can help reduce per capita water use, as well as energy costs. It is recommended that municipal water suppliers develop a long-term plan to retrofit public buildings with water efficient plumbing fixtures and appliances. Some water suppliers have developed partnerships with organizations having similar conservation goals, such as electric or gas suppliers, to develop cooperative rebate and retrofit programs. A study by the AWWA Research Foundation (Residential End Uses of Water, 1999) found that the average indoor water use for a non-conserving home is 69.3 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The average indoor water use in a conserving home is 45.2 gpcd and most of the decrease in water use is related to water efficient plumbing fixtures and appliances that can reduce water, sewer and energy costs. In Minnesota, certain electric and gas providers are required (Minnesota Statute 216B.241) to fund programs that will conserve energy resources and some utilities have distributed water efficient showerheads to customers to help reduce energy demands required to supply hot water. Retrofitting Programs Complete Table 30 by checking which water uses are targeted, the outreach methods used, the measures used to identify success, and any participating partners. Table 30. Retrofitting programs (Select all that apply) Water Use Targets Outreach Methods Partners ☒ Low flush toilets, ☐ Toilet leak tablets, ☒ Low flow showerheads, ☒ Faucet aerators; ☒ Education about ☐ Free distribution of ☐ Rebate for ☒ Required when Remodeling ☐ Gas company ☐ Electric company ☐ Watershed organization 43 Water Use Targets Outreach Methods Partners ☐ Water conserving washing machines, ☐ Dish washers, ☐ Water softeners; ☐ Education about ☐ Free distribution of ☐ Rebate for ☐ Other ☐ Gas company ☐ Electric company ☐ Watershed organization ☐ Rain gardens, ☐ Rain barrels, ☐ Native/drought tolerant landscaping, etc. ☐ Education about ☐ Free distribution of ☐ Rebate for ☐ Other ☐ Gas company ☐ Electric company ☐ Watershed organization Briefly discuss measures of success from the above table (e.g. number of items distributed, dollar value of rebates, gallons of water conserved, etc.): E. Education and Information Programs Customer education should take place in three different circumstances. First, customers should be provided information on how to conserve water and improve water use efficiencies. Second, information should be provided at appropriate times to address peak demands. Third, emergency notices and educational materials about how to reduce water use should be available for quick distribution during an emergency. Proposed Education Programs Complete Table 31 by selecting which methods are used to provide water conservation and information, including the frequency of program components. Select all that apply and add additional lines as needed. Table 31. Current and Proposed Education Programs Education Methods General summary of topics #/Year Frequency Billing inserts or tips printed on the actual bill The City will continue to provide residents information pamphlets via newsletter and social media as such pamphlets become available from DNR and MDH ☒ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Consumer Confidence Reports ☒ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Press releases to traditional local news outlets (e.g., newspapers, radio and TV) ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies 44 Education Methods General summary of topics #/Year Frequency Social media distribution (e.g., emails, Facebook, Twitter) The City will continue to provide residents information pamphlets via newsletter and social media as such pamphlets become available from DNR and MDH ☒ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Paid advertisements (e.g., billboards, print media, TV, radio, web sites, etc.) ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Presentations to community groups ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Staff training ☒ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Facility tours ☒ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Displays and exhibits ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Marketing rebate programs (e.g., indoor fixtures & appliances and outdoor practices) ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Community news letters The City will continue to provide residents information pamphlets via newsletter and social media as such pamphlets become available from DNR and MDH ☒ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Direct mailings (water audit/retrofit kits, showerheads, brochures) ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Information kiosk at utility and public buildings ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies 45 Education Methods General summary of topics #/Year Frequency Public service announcements ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☒ Only during declared emergencies Cable TV Programs ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Demonstration projects (landscaping or plumbing) ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies K-12 education programs (Project Wet, Drinking Water Institute, presentations) ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Community events (children’s water festivals, environmental fairs) ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Community education classes ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Water week promotions ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Website (http://www.ci.orono.mn.us/) The City will continue to provide residents information pamphlets via newsletter and social media as such pamphlets become available from DNR and MDH ☒ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Targeted efforts (large volume users, users with large increases) ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Notices of ordinances ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Emergency conservation notices ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☒ Only during declared emergencies 46 Education Methods General summary of topics #/Year Frequency Other: ☐ Ongoing ☐ Seasonal ☐ Only during declared emergencies Briefly discuss what future education and information activities your community is considering in the future: The City will continue to provide residents information pamphlets via newsletter and social media as such pamphlets become available from DNR and MDH 47 PART 4. ITEMS FOR METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNITIES Minnesota Statute 473.859 requires WSPs to be completed for all local units of government in the seven-county Metropolitan Area as part of the local comprehensive planning process. Much of the information in Parts 1-3 addresses water demand for the next 10 years. However, additional information is needed to address water demand through 2040, which will make the WSP consistent with the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act, upon which the local comprehensive plans are based. This Part 4 provides guidance to complete the WSP in a way that addresses plans for water supply through 2040. A. Water Demand Projections through 2040 Complete Table 7 in Part 1D by filling in information about long-term water demand projections through 2040. Total Community Population projections should be consistent with the community’s system statement, which can be found on the Metropolitan Council’s website and which was sent to the community in September 2015. Projected Average Day, Maximum Day, and Annual Water Demands may either be calculated using the method outlined in Appendix 2 of the 2015 Master Water Supply Plan or by a method developed by the individual water supplier. B. Potential Water Supply Issues Complete Table 10 in Part 1E by providing information about the potential water supply issues in your community, including those that might occur due to 2040 projected water use. The Master Water Supply Plan provides information about potential issues for your community in Appendix 1 (Water Supply Profiles). This resource may be useful in completing Table 10. You may document results of local work done to evaluate impact of planned uses by attaching a feasibility assessment or providing a citation and link to where the plan is available electronically. C. Proposed Alternative Approaches to Meet Extended Water Demand Projections Complete Table 12 in Part 1F with information about potential water supply infrastructure impacts (such as replacements, expansions or additions to wells/intakes, water storage and treatment capacity, distribution systems, and emergency interconnections) of extended plans for development and redevelopment, in 10-year increments through 2040. It may be useful to refer to information in the community’s local Land Use Plan, if available. Complete Table 14 in Part 1F by checking each approach your community is considering to meet future demand. For each approach your community is considering, provide information about the amount of 48 future water demand to be met using that approach, the timeframe to implement the approach, potential partners, and current understanding of the key benefits and challenges of the approach. As challenges are being discussed, consider the need for: evaluation of geologic conditions (mapping, aquifer tests, modeling), identification of areas where domestic wells could be impacted, measurement and analysis of water levels & pumping rates, triggers & associated actions to protect water levels, etc. D. Value-Added Water Supply Planning Efforts (Optional) The following information is not required to be completed as part of the local water supply plan, but completing this can help strengthen source water protection throughout the region and help Metropolitan Council and partners in the region to better support local efforts. Source Water Protection Strategies Does a Drinking Water Supply Management Area for a neighboring public water supplier overlap your community? Yes ☒ No ☐ If you answered no, skip this section. If you answered yes, please complete Table 32 with information about new water demand or land use planning-related local controls that are being considered to provide additional protection in this area. Table 32. Local controls and schedule to protect Drinking Water Supply Management Areas Local Control Schedule to Implement Potential Partners ☐ None at this time ☐ Comprehensive planning that guides development in vulnerable drinking water supply management areas ☐ Zoning overlay ☒ Other: Coordinate efforts to identify proposed high capacity wells in the City’s wellhead protection area, and/or major changes to groundwater appropriations for existing high capacity wells. Proposed new high capacity wells or changes to current appropriation permits will be evaluated by City’s consultant to determine whether proposed pumping will change the boundaries of the delineated WHPA or DWSMA for the City wells or if the vulnerability of the aquifer the wells utilize will be affected. As needed City of Long Lake City of Medina MN DNR Met Council Technical assistance From your community’s perspective, what are the most important topics for the Metropolitan Council to address, guided by the region’s Metropolitan Area Water Supply Advisory Committee and Technical Advisory Committee, as part of its ongoing water supply planning role? ☒ Coordination of state, regional and local water supply planning roles 49 ☐ Regional water use goals ☒ Water use reporting standards ☐ Regional and sub-regional partnership opportunities ☐ Identifying and prioritizing data gaps and input for regional and sub-regional analyses ☐ Others: ___________________________________________________________________ 50 GLOSSARY Agricultural/Irrigation Water Use - Water used for crop and non-crop irrigation, livestock watering, chemigation, golf course irrigation, landscape and athletic field irrigation. Average Daily Demand - The total water pumped during the year divided by 365 days. Calcareous Fen - Calcareous fens are rare and distinctive wetlands dependent on a constant supply of cold groundwater. Because they are dependent on groundwater and are one of the rarest natural communities in the United States, they are a protected resource in MN. Approximately 200 have been located in Minnesota. They may not be filled, drained or otherwise degraded. Commercial/Institutional Water Use - Water used by motels, hotels, restaurants, office buildings, commercial facilities and institutions (both civilian and military). Consider maintaining separate institutional water use records for emergency planning and allocation purposes. Water used by multi-family dwellings, apartment buildings, senior housing complexes, and mobile home parks should be reported as Residential Water Use. Commercial/Institutional/Industrial (C/I/I) Water Sold - The sum of water delivered for commercial/institutional or industrial purposes. Conservation Rate Structure - A rate structure that encourages conservation and may include increasing block rates, seasonal rates, time of use rates, individualized goal rates, or excess use rates. If a conservation rate is applied to multifamily dwellings, the rate structure must consider each residential unit as an individual user. A community may have a separate conservation rate that only goes into effect when the community or governor declares a drought emergency. These higher rates can help to protect the city budgets during times of significantly less water usage. Date of Maximum Daily Demand - The date of the maximum (highest) water demand. Typically this is a day in July or August. Declining Rate Structure - Under a declining block rate structure, a consumer pays less per additional unit of water as usage increases. This rate structure does not promote water conservation. Distribution System - Water distribution systems consist of an interconnected series of pipes, valves, storage facilities (water tanks, water towers, reservoirs), water purification facilities, pumping stations, flushing hydrants, and components that convey drinking water and meeting fire protection needs for cities, homes, schools, hospitals, businesses, industries and other facilities. Flat Rate Structure - Flat fee rates do not vary by customer characteristics or water usage. This rate structure does not promote water conservation. Industrial Water Use - Water used for thermonuclear power (electric utility generation) and other industrial use such as steel, chemical and allied products, paper and allied products, mining, and petroleum refining. Low Flow Fixtures/Appliances - Plumbing fixtures and appliances that significantly reduce the amount of water released per use are labeled “low flow”. These fixtures and appliances use just enough water to be effective, saving excess, clean drinking water that usually goes down the drain. Maximum Daily Demand - The maximum (highest) amount of water used in one day. Metered Residential Connections - The number of residential connections to the water system that have meters. For multifamily dwellings, report each residential unit as an individual user. Percent Unmetered/Unaccounted For - Unaccounted for water use is the volume of water withdrawn from all sources minus the volume of water delivered. This value represents water “lost” by miscalculated water use due to inaccurate meters, water lost through leaks, or water that is used but unmetered or otherwise undocumented. Water used for public services such as hydrant flushing, ice skating rinks, and public swimming pools should be reported under the category “Water Supplier Services”. 51 Population Served - The number of people who are served by the community’s public water supply system. This includes the number of people in the community who are connected to the public water supply system, as well as people in neighboring communities who use water supplied by the community’s public water supply system. It should not include residents in the community who have private wells or get their water from neighboring water supply. Residential Connections - The total number of residential connections to the water system. For multifamily dwellings, report each residential unit as an individual user. Residential Per Capita Demand - The total residential water delivered during the year divided by the population served divided by 365 days. Residential Water Use - Water used for normal household purposes such as drinking, food preparation, bathing, washing clothes and dishes, flushing toilets, and watering lawns and gardens. Should include all water delivered to single family private residences, multi-family dwellings, apartment buildings, senior housing complexes, mobile home parks, etc. Smart Meter - Smart meters can be used by municipalities or by individual homeowners. Smart metering generally indicates the presence of one or more of the following:  Smart irrigation water meters are controllers that look at factors such as weather, soil, slope, etc. and adjust watering time up or down based on data. Smart controllers in a typical summer will reduce water use by 30%-50%. Just changing the spray nozzle to new efficient models can reduce water use by 40%.  Smart Meters on customer premises that measure consumption during specific time periods and communicate it to the utility, often on a daily basis.  A communication channel that permits the utility, at a minimum, to obtain meter reads on demand, to ascertain whether water has recently been flowing through the meter and onto the premises, and to issue commands to the meter to perform specific tasks such as disconnecting or restricting water flow. Total Connections - The number of connections to the public water supply system. Total Per Capita Demand - The total amount of water withdrawn from all water supply sources during the year divided by the population served divided by 365 days. Total Water Pumped - The cumulative amount of water withdrawn from all water supply sources during the year. Total Water Delivered - The sum of residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, water supplier services, wholesale and other water delivered. Ultimate (Full Build-Out) - Time period representing the community’s estimated total amount and location of potential development, or when the community is fully built out at the final planned density. Unaccounted (Non-revenue) Loss - See definitions for “percent unmetered/unaccounted for loss”. Uniform Rate Structure - A uniform rate structure charges the same price-per-unit for water usage beyond the fixed customer charge, which covers some fixed costs. The rate sends a price signal to the customer because the water bill will vary by usage. Uniform rates by class charge the same price-per-unit for all customers within a customer class (e.g. residential or non-residential). This price structure is generally considered less effective in encouraging water conservation. Water Supplier Services - Water used for public services such as hydrant flushing, ice skating rinks, public swimming pools, city park irrigation, back-flushing at water treatment facilities, and/or other uses. Water Used for Nonessential Purposes - Water used for lawn irrigation, golf course and park irrigation, car washes, ornamental fountains, and other non-essential uses. Wholesale Deliveries - The amount of water delivered in bulk to other public water suppliers. 52 Acronyms and Initialisms AWWA – American Water Works Association C/I/I – Commercial/Institutional/Industrial CIP – Capital Improvement Plan GIS – Geographic Information System GPCD – Gallons per capita per day GWMA – Groundwater Management Area – North and East Metro, Straight River, Bonanza, MDH – Minnesota Department of Health MGD – Million gallons per day MG – Million gallons MGL – Maximum Contaminant Level MnTAP – Minnesota Technical Assistance Program (University of Minnesota) MPARS – MN/DNR Permitting and Reporting System (new electronic permitting system) MRWA – Minnesota Rural Waters Association SWP – Source Water Protection WHP – Wellhead Protection APPENDICES TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE WATER SUPPLIER Appendix 1: Well records and maintenance summaries Go to Part 1C for information on what to include in appendix Appendix 2: Water level monitoring plan Go to Part 1E for information on what to include in appendix Appendix 3: Water level graphs for each water supply well Go to Part 1E for information on what to include in appendix Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan Go to Part 1E for information on what to include in appendix Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List Go to Part 2C for information on what to include in appendix Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services Go to Part 2C for information on what to include in appendix Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Ordinance Go to Part 2C for information on what to include in appendix Appendix 8: Graph of Ten Years of Annual Per Capita Water Demand for Each Customer Category Go to Objective 4 in Part 3B for information on what to include in appendix Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure Go to Objective 6 in Part 3B for information on what to include in appendix Appendix 10: Ordinances or Regulations Related to Water Use Go to Objective 7 in Part 3B for information on what to include in appendix Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist Provide a table that summarizes all the actions that the public water supplier is doing, or proposes to do, with estimated implementation dates. Appendix 12: Sources of Information for Table 10 Provide links or references to the information used to complete Table 10. If the file size is reasonable, provide source information as attachments to the plan. CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4D PUBLIC SERVICES PLAN Introduction 4D-2 Scope 4D-2 Public Safety Services 4D-3 Public Education 4D-5 Government Agencies and Services 4D-7 Figure 4D-1 Zip Codes 4D-8 Privately Operated Utilities and Services 4D-9 City Owned Land, Rights, and Easements 4D-11 Tax Forfeited Lands 4D-12 Coordination with Adjoining Municipalities 4D-13 Appendix Map 4D-1: School Districts Map 4D-2: Electric Service Areas Map 4D-3: Telephone Service CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 2 CMP PART 4D PUBLIC SERVICES PLAN INTRODUCTION This chapter of the Community Management Plan includes a brief review of all the many other necessary services and facilities of a municipality that were not mandated elements of Twin Cities Regional planning. The elements contained in this Chapter have varying degrees of impact upon metropolitan systems, but they all have important ties to Orono's local planning development and land use concerns. The Goals, Policies and Plans outlined in this Chapter are an integral part of the total Community Management Plan and have been derived from joint and concurrent consideration of all community planning elements. This Chapter of the CMP is prepared and presented for the following purposes: 1. The Public Services Plan is intended to place the identified services and facilities within the context of the overall Community Management Plan. 2. The Public Services Plan is intended to be a management tool for City officials and City staff in the development and management of municipal services and facilities necessary to support the basic planning objectives of the City. 3. The Public Services Plan is intended to advise our neighboring municipalities and other governmental agencies of our intended service levels, and our intention to continue cooperative service arrangements. SCOPE The Public Services Plan is an integral part of Orono's Community Management Plan. The policy decisions relating to Orono's public service requirements complement and balance regional plans with local concerns for historic development patterns, environmental protection, fiscal responsibility and general land use. CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 3 PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES POLICE SERVICES Orono has had an independent police force since 1962. The Police Department operates out of headquarters facilities located in the City administrative complex on Kelley Parkway. Orono Police currently provide contract services to the citizens of Long Lake, Spring Park, Minnetonka Beach, and Mound. Police Service Goals 1. To create and maintain a feeling of security in the community. 2. To reduce the opportunity for the commission of crimes. 3. To aid individuals having medical emergencies or who are in danger of physical harm, and to assist those who cannot care for themselves. 4. To identify criminal offenders and criminal activity and, where appropriate, to apprehend offenders and participate in subsequent court proceedings. 5. To resolve conflict. 6. To protect constitutional guarantees and to promote and preserve civil order. 7. To identify potentially serious law enforcement problems. 8. To facilitate the efficient and hazard-free movement of people and vehicles. 9. To achieve the above goals within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens. Police Service Policies In order to achieve the stated Police Service Goals, the Orono Police Department will be operated and administered according to the following policies: 1. A basic level of routine police services will be provided to all citizens within the department's jurisdiction. The level of routine services provided in the Rural Area is not to be as extensive or as frequent as that level necessary in the more densely developed urban neighborhoods. 2. Twenty-four (24) hour emergency response will be provided to all citizens within the department's jurisdiction. 3. Orono will participate in active mutual aid arrangements with police departments in adjoining jurisdictions. CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 4 4. Orono will rely on technical support from other agencies including the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office. 5. Orono will embrace the “Community Oriented Policing” concept. 6. The Orono Police Reserve program will continue. 7. Orono expects to continue contract services with adjoining municipalities. Police Service Plans Orono intends to continue operation of the Orono Police Department and provide contract services to adjacent municipalities consistent with their desires. The size and abilities of the Department will be consistent with and dependent upon the land use type and density within the Department's jurisdiction. Police department funding, including contract service costs, will be based upon the level of service desired. FIRE SERVICES Fire protection services in Orono are contracted with the Long Lake Fire Department. Fire Service Goals 1. To encourage fire prevention practices. 2. To provide fire protection and fire suppression services. 3. To provide reasonable levels of total fire services within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens. Fire Service Policies In order to achieve reasonable levels of fire protection for Orono citizens, the City expects to provide and administer fire services according to the following policies: 1. Fire prevention is the first step toward reduction in fire loss damages. The City has adopted and will enforce the State Fire Code (which incorporates the provisions of the National Fire Protection Association Code). 2. A basic level of fire protection services will be provided consistent with land use type and density. Urban areas will be expected to require more frequent fire services and more extensive fire services than that necessary in rural areas. Fire protection levels will be expected to be higher where municipal water is available than where water supplies must be transported to the scene. 3. Each of the contracting fire departments will be expected to provide all necessary administration, equipment and manpower to provide adequate service within their district. Each of the two contracting fire departments is a municipally-operated volunteer fire department. CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 5 4. Orono expects to contribute its fair share of fire department expenses. Both fire protection contracts are written with the respective municipality and not directly with the fire department. Orono will expect to contribute its fair share of the costs of equipping and operating each fire department in comparison to Orono’s relative service requirements. Fire Service Plans Orono intends to continue contracting for fire services from Long Lake. Land use type or density in areas not provided with municipal water will not be increased beyond the capability of rural water-hauling fire tactics. PUBLIC EDUCATION Orono is served by four local School Districts in addition to a number of private elementary and pre- schools, a private charter school, and a privately operated art center which provides nationally recognized art education to the public. Orono's four local school districts serve geographic areas of the City as indicated on Map 4D-1. Each of the four districts provides its own full service program of educational services for grades Kindergarten through Twelve, plus special education, recreation and community service programs. Each District is operated independent of the City by a separately elected School Board. Each District provides and manages its own student transportation services. And, since each District has its own tax powers, there maybe difference in total property tax mill levy between different neighborhoods in the City. Minnetonka School District No. 276. This School District has the smallest area of the City within its borders serving only the two small sections of Big Island. The odd arrangement of this boundary dates back to some of the former township realignments in 1868 and 1889. It is doubtful that any Minnetonka students actually reside in Orono as only seasonal cottages are located on these portions of the island. Westonka School District No. 277. This School District includes all of the Navarre Area, the major portion of Orono's Urban Service Area, and a small amount of rural land on our western border. All Orono students within the district are now bused to their classrooms in Mound or Minnetrista: Mound Westonka High School, Sunnyfield Road, Minnetrista (Grades 8-12) Grandview Middle School, Commerce Boulevard, Mound (Grades 5-7) Shirley Hills Primary School, Wilshire Blvd., Mound (Grades pre-K - 4) Hilltop Primary School, Game Farm Road, Minnetrista (Grades pre-K - 4). Westonka Schools have continually upgraded facilities, most recently a new performing arts center and an athletic and recreation center. Most of Orono's land area within District 277 is fully developed and urbanized with very little potential for major population increase. Orono School District No. 278. This School District includes more of Orono's land area than all other districts combined. Most of this District is within Orono's Rural Area where total planned density is relatively low. However, this is also where most of Orono's remaining development will occur. Therefore, CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 6 student population from this area of Orono is likely to remain steady or slightly increase over the next 10- 20 years. Because of the low land use density and the distances involved, almost all Orono students are now bused or driven to their classrooms on the Orono campus located on Old Crystal Bay Road between County Road 6 and Wayzata Boulevard. Included in this facility are: Orono High School, 795 Old Crystal Bay Rd. N. (Grades 9-12) Orono Middle School, 800 Old Crystal Bay Rd. N. (Grades 6-8) Orono Intermediate School, 685 Old Crystal Bay Rd. N. (Grades 3-5) Schumann Elementary School, 765 Old Crystal Bay Rd. N. (Grades K-2) The Orono Schools have continually upgraded facilities in Orono, including a field house completed during the winter of 2018-19. The City and School District partners toward the improvement of Old Crystal Bay Road with consolidated accesses and dedicated turn lanes to increase traffic flow and pedestrian safety. The City has ample municipal water supply to serve the Orono Schools facilities. Orono’s municipal sewer capacity downstream from the school campus is currently adequate to accommodate all known planned school facility needs. Wayzata School District No. 284. This School District includes a small section of Orono's eastern edge including fully developed neighborhoods within the Urban Area and some homes in the Rural Area. A significant portion of this District's Orono land area is within the Wayzata Country Club's golf course or within the DNR’s Wood Rill Scientific and Natural Area. Because of these long term land uses, and the low density planned rural land use, the potential for student population from this portion of Orono is very limited. Compared with the major increases in population occurring in this District in Plymouth, any change in Orono student population would be insignificant. Under current zoning, approximately 125 households in Orono will ultimately be served by Wayzata Schools. All Orono students are bused to classrooms in Wayzata or Plymouth. Facilities used by Orono students include: Wayzata High School, Peony Lane, Plymouth (Grades 9-12) Wayzata West Middle School, Barry Avenue, Wayzata (Grades 6-8) Gleason Lake Elementary, County Road 101, Plymouth (Grades K-5) None of these facilities are expected to be closed in the future. Any new facilities will likely be constructed in Plymouth where major population increases are occurring. Since no school facilities are located in Orono, Orono's facilities plans have no direct impact on District 284. The Minnetonka Center for Arts and Education offers instruction and facilities for all forms of artistic expression. The Art Center was established in the early 1970's as a local, privately operated place for artistic endeavors. Since that time, facilities have been provided for all-forms of education and hands- on art experience. The Art Center is privately operated and privately financed, but enrollment is open to all. Many Orono residents are active participants. CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 7 Orono residents have ready access to all metropolitan educational facilities. Orono is within daily commuting distance of all the many educational institutions in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area including the University of Minnesota, community colleges, vocational schools and many private colleges, universities and specialty schools. This ready availability amply supplements the schools and institutions located within our borders. Public Education Policies 1. The City will take no direct role in determining educational needs. This is the responsibility of the separate school districts. 2. The City will encourage coordination of facilities and programs between those districts serving Orono. Orono and surrounding communities have limited populations and limited taxation capabilities. The City will encourage all reasonable forms of cooperation between school districts so as to avoid unnecessary duplication of staff or facilities. 3. The City will coordinate community service programs with the school districts. Although each is administered separately, the City and School Districts are used and financed by the same citizens. It is only reasonable to expect cooperation so that improved community services such as recreation programs will be able to utilize available facilities and talents without duplication of effort or cost. Public Education Plans Orono's projected slow rate of population growth should not require the provision of any new educational facilities in any of the four local school districts, other than those facilities already planned. Orono's public facilities plans have no impact on the Wayzata, Minnetonka or Westonka School Districts because they have no facilities located in Orono. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND SERVICES This Section provides a brief review of the several public agencies that have jurisdiction over certain subjects in Orono, and a review of special services which have direct benefit to many Orono residents. A review of these subjects is not a mandated element of regional planning, but their inclusion in this CMP is indicative of their relationship to environmental conditions and land use planning. CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 8 U. S. POSTAL SERVICE Addresses within Orono are tied to one of 5 different zip codes. There is no unique zip code for Orono. The lack of a single post office serving the entire City has long been a point of discussion among residents who may, for instance, live in the City of Orono, have children attending the Mound Schools, and have a mailing address of Wayzata, Excelsior or Mound. Figure 4D-1 zip codes Postal Service Goal To have the U.S. Postal Service allow the use of the City name "Orono" with the appropriate post office zip code, which will lend cohesiveness and identity to our community. Postal Service Policy Orono will encourage the Postal Service to establish a separate "Orono" zip code or to utilize one of the existing rural route zip codes, combined with the use of "Orono, Minnesota", as the City address. CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 9 PRIVATELY OPERATED UTILITIES AND SERVICES Citizens and properties in Orono are provided with power and communication services by public utility companies operating under public regulation and franchise. Sanitation services are provided by private haulers operating under license from the City. As in other elements of the CMP, the availability of service levels varies between the urban and rural portions of the City. In addition, electricity and telephone service districts are each divided between two different utility companies making coordination with City officials and City policy more involved than if only one company were involved. Electrical Service Electrical service is provided in Orono by two separate utilities. Northern States Power (NSP) provides service to most of Orono with local offices in Shorewood. Wright-Hennepin Co-op Electric Association, with offices in Rockford, provides service to a few properties in northern and northwestern Orono. The service areas are divided as shown on Map 4D-2. Cable Television & Communication Service Orono is provided with cable television service by Mediacom, the franchise holder which currently owns and maintains the cable television infrastructure in the Lake Minnetonka area. Not all homes in Orono are currently provided with cable service, which relies on a minimum level of residential development density in order to financially justify the infrastructure costs. Local programming and franchise administration are under the auspices of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission (LMCC), a joint powers organization consisting of 17 of the smaller cities around Lake Minnetonka. In terms of franchise administration, the LMCC controls rates on basic service, reviews technical standards and compliance, ensures that the cable operator is meeting the needs of the community in customer service, and provides quality television production facilities and training for the local communities. In terms of local programming, LMCC operates a television production studio in Spring Park and generates local programming which is broadcast over two local access channels. A total of four channels are dedicated to local Public, Educational and Governmental programming (“PEG Access”). Private Utility & Sanitation Service Goal To provide all citizens and all areas of the City with adequate levels of service in the most economical manner possible consistent with Orono’s urban-rural land use plans. Sanitation Policies 1. Each resident will be responsible for his own sanitation requirements. The City will require by ordinance that all residents individually contract with a licensed hauler for regular pickup and removal of all garbage, trash, and rubbish. 2. Licensed haulers will be responsible for all administrative requirements including arranging for their own disposal sites. Rates, routes and schedules shall be determined by the hauler. Locating an approved disposal site and paying CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 10 all disposal costs shall be the responsibility of the hauler. 3. The City will encourage all recycling and resource recovery activities. Too much solid waste is being generated by all citizens. The City will encourage conservation measures by the citizens, by the haulers, by independent operators and by all levels of government. The City will encourage returnable bottles and cans and a general reduction in the volume of packaging materials. The City will encourage organics recycling. 4. The City will encourage neighborhood clean-up campaigns. At least once a year, the City will provide a local disposal site for trash and debris to encourage a general housecleaning and city-wide spruce-up of back yards, road sides, and vacant lots. Sanitation Plans 1. The City will continue the practice of private sanitation and haulage without direct public involvement in this activity. 2. The City will investigate the establishment of a recycling center or facility within Orono to encourage energy conservation and reduction in solid waste generation. 3. The City will participate with Hennepin County and other municipalities to find alternative waste disposal solutions. Management of Utility Conduits Private Utility Policies 1. Utility placement will be permitted in public rights-of-way. 2. The City will require dedication of appropriate utility easements in all new subdivisions. 3. The City will require that utilities provided to new developments be placed underground whenever feasible. 4. The provision of utilities to new developments will be a private responsibility and will not be coordinated by the City nor provided with any public financial support. 5. Utility regulation, including rate charges, shall be by the State Public Service Commission and shall not be by the City. The City will not intervene in any problems or complaints between customers and private utility companies. CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 11 6. No private utility connection permits will be required from the City except that street opening permits will be required whenever a utility excavates within any public street right-of-way. CITY OWNED LAND, RIGHTS, AND EASEMENTS City Owned Easements The City has equitable interest in various types of easements across privately owned property throughout the City. The underlying property owner retains fee title to the property, but his use is limited in various ways according to terms of the particular easement. The City's rights are strictly limited to the purposes and conditions of the particular easement. These easements are described below according to their intended purpose: Underlying Road Easements. The Transportation Plan includes provisions for privately owned and maintained roads particularly in the rural area. In all cases where private roads are allowed, the City will as a condition of the subdivision require dedication and recording of a permanent underlying public ingress, egress and access easement. These easements will ensure legal access of the public to all properties served by the private road. Further, the City will by ordinance and easement conditions, guarantee that all private roads are maintained to City standards at all times through required maintenance agreements and/or homeowner's associations, and that failure of the private group to so maintain their private road will be cause for the City to accomplish needed maintenance and to assess the benefited properties for the direct cost of such maintenance. The existence of these easements will not in and of itself indicate any intention of the City to acquire and/or to regularly maintain the subject private roads, but only provides a legal contingency to assure general public-safety as well as public access to all building sites. Utility Easements. The City will as much as possible locate all public utilities on publicly owned rights-of-way. Particularly in the case of sewer lines, however, this is not always feasible in Orono’s hilly terrain. The need for gravity flow often requires a sewer location to run across private properties, quite often between the homes and the lakeshore. In these instances, the City will acquire permanent utility easements to allow such placement and to permit regular maintenance activities to occur. The typical easement is at least 10 and does preclude any temporary or permanent construction over the sewer route. The existence of these underground utilities and the appurtenant easement seldom affects the appearance or use of the property, other than the construction limitation. In addition to the above, all new subdivisions are required to include platted, dedicated public "drainage and utility" easements along most lot lines to facilitate lot drainage and the installation of utilities such as sewer, water, power and telephone without the need for separate legal instruments. Drainage Easements. As in the case of utility easements, the City's topography often has resulted in natural drainageways running over privately owned property. Non-obstruction of the natural CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 12 drainage system is protected by our local environmental ordinances because such natural systems often are not covered by legal easements. Drainage easements are utilized where the City has constructed and/or maintains a storm drainage system across private property. These easements do legally record the non-obstruction requirements as well as provide for City maintenance access. In addition, all new subdivisions are required to include platted, dedicated public "drainage easements" along all natural creeks and drainageways and over all designated marshland or wetland. Flowage & Conservation Easements and Covenants for Wetland and Wetland Buffer Protection. Orono's Environmental Preservation and Surface Water Management Plans, as well as certain City Ordinances, have identified and designated wetlands, marshland and flood plains throughout the City that are to be permanently protected and preserved from encroachment or alteration. Whenever land containing such features is subdivided or developed, the City will require the land owner to dedicate a permanent flowage and conservation easement to the City over the affected portion of his land. Open Space Easements. In certain development situations, the City may have particular interest in permanently precluding certain types of improvements or in permanently protecting views or natural conditions or otherwise private property. This protection may be in return for allowing use or development of other areas of the property. In these circumstances, the City will require dedication of a permanent open space easement identifying the protected area and describing permitted and on-permitted uses or alterations. Open space easements may be temporary or permanent depending upon the circumstance. Open space easements will be filed in the chain of title of the subject property. Trail Easements. In locations where the City trail system has been or will be constructed, a Trail Easement will be acquired, either at the time property is subdivided (often as part of the required Park Dedication associated with land development) or via purchase or other means. Trail easements will be filed on the chain of title of the property, and will allow the use of the land by the City for the construction of a trail and permanent access by the public. TAX FORFEITED LANDS Many areas of Orono were platted and partially developed as much as 100 years ago, often into extremely small parcels. Many of these lots have never been developed because of their size, location or, often, because they are wetlands. They are not separately buildable because of land use and environmental constraints. Consequently, there are a number of lots that have been forfeited for non-payment of real estate taxes and for which title is held by the State of Minnesota. The City of Orono does not encourage tax forfeiture, but likewise the City will not permit use of extremely substandard or environmentally protected lands. Where tax forfeited lots exist, the City will pursue the following policies: 1. Encourage purchase by adjacent land owners for inclusion with their properties, CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 13 normally requiring legal combination of the tax forfeit parcel with the adjacent land. 2. Encourage sale and private development of those parcels large enough to accommodate an occupancy consistent with the City's land use plans and zoning performance standards particularly where they can be used for low and moderate income housing pursuant to the Housing Plan. 3. Review and acquire for park purposes lots or larger parcels of sufficient size and location to be used for neighborhood mini-parks or play areas, or which are adjacent to and would be an appropriate addition to existing park or open space lands. 4. Review and acquire for flowage and conservation purposes those lots totally or significantly covered by marshland or wetland or which would have value for the City’s surface water management system. COORDINATION WITH ADJOINING MUNICIPALITES The City of Orono has a long history of collaboration with the many municipalities who share its borders. This is illustrated by existing and ongoing shared services such as municipal sewer and water interconnections, building inspection services, police and fire department services, etc. Orono remains supportive of continued cooperation with adjoining municipalities in the provision of public services, and will work together with its neighbors on matters of common interest. )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongLak e C reekPainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6 t h A v e N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArm D r Azure RoadBrownRoadNShorelineDr H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake Road Day PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring Hill RoadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Sugar woodDrRegent s W a lkC ygnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Canterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_4D-1_SchoolDistricts_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 10/30/2018 12:06:52 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN School DistrictsNovember 2018 School Districts Map 4D-1 Minnetonka Orono Wayzata Westonka Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongLak e C reekPainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6 t h A v e N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArm D r Azure RoadBrownRoadNShorelineDr H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake Road Day PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring Hill RoadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Sugar woodDrRegent s W a lkC ygnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Canterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_4D-2_ElectricServiceAreas_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 10/30/2018 12:06:15 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Electrical Service AreasNovember 2018 Electrical Service Areas Map 4D-2 Xcel Energy Wright-HennepinCO-OP Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongLak e C reekPainterCreekMinnetonka Blvd Lake St Extension Highland Ave P eaveyRoad6 t h A v e N Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetDrRutledge Road 22nd Ave NLynwood Blvd Commerce BlvdHighway12E TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Highw ood Dr 1 8th AveN NArm D r Azure RoadBrownRoadNShorelineDr H ighw ay 719th A v e NFerndaleRoadS8th Ave N NS horeDr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd EWillow Dr NBaysideRoad Kelley Pk w y County Road 151 Ranchview Ln NWayzata Blvd W Lake Ave Daniels St SparrowRoadLarchwoodDrLakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N P a i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave 9thA v e NRid g e view DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NOldLongLake Road Day PlCounty Road 83Lyric Ave Spring Hill RoadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Ga me Fa rm R o a d E Eastw oodRoad5thA veN Fox St Moline Road Drake Dr Sugar woodDrRegent s W a lkC ygnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Kelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90CountyRoad101CrosbyRoadBartlettBlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Canterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NLeaf StMcCulleyRoadCountyRoad110NVictoria StIs l a nd ViewDrVicksburg Ln NStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_4D-3_TelephoneServiceAreas_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/14/2018 3:57:45 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Telephone Service AreasNovember 2018 Telephone Service Areas Map 4D-3 Frontier Century Link Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4E PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL PLAN Introduction 4E-2 Existing Park, Open Space and Trail System Inventory 4E-2 Park Classification and Definitions 4E-2 Table 4E-1 Parks Facilities 4E-2 Table 4E-2 State or Regional Facilities 4E-4 Table 4E-3 School Facilities 4E-4 Table 4E-4 Lakes 4E-5 Park System Needs Identification 4E-5 Table 4E-5 Parks, Open Space and Trail Acreage by Classification 4E-6 Park, Open Space and Trail Goals and Policies 4E-6 Park, Open Space and Trail Action Plan 4E-9 Table 4E-6 Big Island Implementation 4E-9 Table 4E-7 Golf Course Implementation 4E-10 Table 4E-8 Trail Implementation 4E-11 Resourcing 4E-11 Appendices 4E-A. Park Details 4E-B Park Classification and Definition 4E-C Lake Access types Map 4E-1 Parks and Trails Map Map 4E-2 Lake Access map CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 2 INTRODUCTION The provision of parks, open space areas and trails is an essential quality of life element for the residents of the City. It is important for Orono to develop and implement a thoughtful strategy for meeting these needs in an efficient, economical manner. This Park, Open Space and Trail Plan is a refinement and restatement of the ongoing planning practice of the City of Orono. It respects and maintains the historic development patterns of the City. It continues many of the basic open space concepts established by the first organized comprehensive planning attempts in the mid 1960's, the 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Guide Plan, and the 1980 Community Management Plan, the 2000-2020 CMP, and the 2010-2030 CMP. This Plan is prepared and presented for the following purposes: 1. To identify the recreation and open space needs of the City and its citizens. 2. To be a management tool for City officials, appointed commissions, City staff, and other parties involved in developing, maintaining, and managing recreational programs and city owned facilities in Orono. 3. Serve as the recreation open space element of our community management plan, designed to address and conform to all the applicable provisions of the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan EXISTING PARK, OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL SYSTEM INVENTORY City of Orono Facilities The City of Orono maintains over 260 acres of parks, trails and open space. The table below summarizes the types of parks and facilities available throughout the city system. Map 4E-1 illustrates the City parks, trails and recreation system. Appendix 4E-A has detailed descriptions of each park. Table 4E-1 below summarizes major features of the Park system. Appendix 4E-B includes a description of each park classification. Table 4E-1 City of Orono Park Facilities Park Acres Playground Sports Fields Baseball Basketball Golf Ice Skating Swimming Trail or Trail Access Nature Area Picnicking Fishing Winter Lake Access Parking Restrooms Notes Mini Livingston Tower Park 0.2 X Neighborhood Roberta Lee Antoine Park 1.3 X Crystal Bay Park 2.3 X X X X X X Navarre Playground 1.1 X X X X Community playfields Bederwood Park 9.05 X X X X X X X Hackberry 3.58 X X X X X X CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 3 Casco Point Ice Rink 3.1 X X Community Parks Casco Point Park 8.5 X X French Creek Preserve 33.9 X X X X Saga Hill Preserve 28.9 X X X Big Island Nature Park 56.5 X X X X X Lowry Woods 14.1 X X Highwood Park 13.6 X X X Seven Nations Park 3.0 X X Pleasant View Park 1.2 X Lake Accesses There are 50 lake access point below are those capable of support recreation activities. A comprehensive list is at Map 4E-2 and Appendix 4E- C. Casco Point Beach (36) 0.3 X Lydiard Beach 0.7 X X Sandy Beach (19) 0.28 X Summit Park Beach 4.5 X X X Browns Bay Molly’s corner (1a) 0.04 X X Shoreline at Spates (2) 0.02 Winter Vehicular North Shore Drive at Baldur Park Road (4) 0.04 Winter Vehicular Crystal Bay Road (6) 0.04 Boating and bathing deeds for select parcels Gibbs Landing - Fox St. 0.04 x Pedestrian year- round, vehicles winter only Eastlake Street (10) 0.04 x Winter Vehicular Bayside Rd. at Stubbs Bay Rd. (11) 0.04 X x X Winter snowmobiles access, Fishing Dock Westlake Street (14) 0.04 X Pedestrian Access Park Lane (15) 0.04 X Fishing Dock Loma Linda Avenue (22) 0.04 X Fishing Dock Corral Road Extension (34) 0.04 X Pedestrian Access Ivy Lane (38) 0.04 X Pedestrian Access Spring Street (39) 0.04 X Pedestrian Access Carman Street (40) 0.04 X Fishing Dock Trails Ferndale Road 1.8 x Willow Drive 0.7 x CR 6 0.6 x Brown Road 0.7 x Special Use Areas Orono Golf Course 45.6 X X X Golf , Winter Sledding and X- country Skiing Lurton Park 39 X X Off Leash Dog Park CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 4 Regional Facilities There are numerous state and regional parks, trails and open space facilities within Orono’s boundaries. Table 4E-2 State or Regional Facilities Agency Facility Acres in Orono Classification Three Rivers Morris T. Baker Regional Park Reserve 255 Existing Regional Park Noerenberg Memorial Gardens 73 Existing Regional Park Lake Minnetonka Islands Regional Park 65.45 Existing Regional Park Lake Independence Trail 3 Existing Regional Trail Dakota Rail Regional Trail 30 Existing Regional Trail MnDNR Wolsfeld Woods Scientific and Natural Area 40 Existing Scientific and Natural Area Wood Rill Scientific and Natural Area 220 Existing Scientific and Natural Area Luce Line State Trail 57 Existing State Trail School and Other Publicly Available Recreational Facilities Orono Schools The Orono School District campus on Old Crystal Bay Road North provides a wide range of facilities for school and community use, including tennis courts, football and soccer fields, baseball/softball, etc. Additionally, the school property is home to the Orono Ice Arena (developed by the Orono Hockey Boosters) and Lee Carlson Baseball Fields (developed by the Orono Baseball Association). Table 4E-3 School Facilities Facility Acres in Orono Classification Orono School Campus fields 20 Community Playfields Orono Ice Arena 4 Special Use Lee Carlson Baseball Fields 8 Community Play Fields Westonka Schools, Wayzata, and Minnetonka Schools. Westonka, Wayzata, and Minnetonka School Districts offers facilities for sports and recreation use, but are not listed here because those facilities are not located in the City of Orono. Private Parks Available to the General Public One of the most recent additions to the Orono Park roster is the Lakeview Legacy Park. The park is 4.5 acres of privately owned publicly available park land. CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 5 Lakes and Lake Access With more than 40 miles of Lake Minnetonka shoreline and nearly 5 miles of additional lake shorelines, Orono’s lakes provide a significant recreational resource for all Orono residents. Lakes A defining characteristic of Orono is access to lake recreation opportunities. The two major lakes within the community are Lake Minnetonka which is managed by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and Long Lake which is shared between Long Lake and Orono. In addition to access that lake shore property owners enjoy the city maintains a number of lake access points. The DNR and Hennepin County each maintain boat access points on Lake Minnetonka. Table 4E-4: Lakes Agency Facility Acres in Orono LMCD Lake Minnetonka 4,700 Orono/Long Lake Long Lake 221 Lake Access In order to provide lake access for the general public, as well as to provide for fire department access to the lake as a water source, a number of lake access corridors were created as the shore land developed. These typically are platted, dedicated right-of-ways leading from the local road system to the shoreline, and are commonly from 16' to 66' in width. The historic level of use of these right-of-ways (sometimes referred to as a fire lanes or lake access roads) ranges from minimal to year-round. A number of these corridors have been maintained by the City for local swimming beaches or as winter snowmobile and ice- fishing accesses. Certain accesses are provided with docks for fishing, and some have ramp areas suitable for launching a small boat. However, most do not have designated parking available, and are primarily intended to serve the neighborhood rather than the general public. A number of these access corridors have steep topography and experience a relatively low level of usage. Map 4E-2 shows Lake Access Point and includes a complete listing of lake access points. Appendix 4E-C also includes a listing of lake access points. PARK SYSTEM NEEDS IDENTIFICATION At the present time, there are many parks and open space facilities located in the City of Orono. These recreation and open space facilities are primarily under City, State, County, and School District jurisdiction. Parks, Open Space and Trail Acreage by Classification Table 4E-5 below depicts the amount of park, trails and open space within the boundaries of Orono by type. The National Recreation and Parks Association recommends a minimum of 9.6 acres per 1000 population of available park land. Orono is well above this standard with 34.3 acres of parkland per 1000 population with just city maintained facilities. CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 6 Table 4E-5: Parks, Open Space and Trails Acreage by Classification (2018) Classification Acreage Acres per 1000 Mini-Parks 0.2 0.0 Neighborhood Parks 4.8 0.6 Community Playfields 12.6 1.6 Community Parks 160.0 20.6 Lake Access 6.4 0.8 Trails 3.9 0.5 Orono Special Use Areas 79.1 10.2 Other Orono Preserved Areas 0.0 City Subtotal 266.9 34.3 Regional Park 515 66.2 Regional Park Reserve 78 10.0 Special Use 77 9.9 Regional Trail 13 1.6 Lake Access 5 0.6 Community Play Fields 28 3.6 Community park 4.5 0.6 Regional, school and private public 720 92.5 Grand Total 986.9 126.8 Lakes 4921 632.1 Summary and Conclusions 2018 Citizen Park Survey To help inform this chapter the city conducted a parks, trails and open space survey. The results of the survey are available on the city website or by contacting the City Clerk. PARK, OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Park, Open Space and Trail Plan is based upon the following goals and Policies, which in turn are consistent with the other elements of Orono's Community Management Plans: Goals 1. To provide passive open space and active recreational opportunities to serve the needs and desires all residents. 2. To protect, preserve, restore and provide access to ecologically significant natural resource areas, wildlife habitats and open space. 3. To provide citywide bike and walking trails that provide connections between area parks, trails and open space and when possible function as a transportation corridors. 4. To identify, preserve and highlight areas of historical significance. 5. To maintain and increase access for all residents to the city’s lake resources such as Lake Minnetonka and Long Lake. 6. To achieve the above goals within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens by CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 7 developing fiscal and management policies that support maintenance, development and acquisition of parks and open spaces. Policies 1. The city will maintain a Park Commission of appointed residents to continually assess and evaluate the current parks, trails and open spaces within Orono. (Supports goals 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) 2. The city will actively encourage civic involvement in developing and maintaining Orono’s parks and open spaces through programs such as adopt a parks and park clean up days. (Supports goals 1, 2, 6) 3. The City will cooperate and actively work with public and private organizations to provide additional opportunities for recreation and open space that complement existing municipal, regional and private facilities. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) 4. Orono will require land developers to provide for recreational space to serve all new subdivisions. New developments that results in increased land use density will be required to include public dedication of lands necessary for additional parks, playgrounds, bike-hike trails and open space or will be required to contribute funds for the municipal purchase, of such lands or improvement of existing recreation facilities proportionate to the cumulative effect of such density increase. (Supports goals 1, 2, 3, 6) 5. Orono will encourage the preservation and protection of natural recreational and open space amenities including lakes, marshland, wetlands, and natural woodlands on private lands though open space through conservation easements, private donations, land trusts and other preservation methods that allow the private sector to play role in preservation of open spaces. (Supports goals 2, 6) 6. Orono will coordinate with other jurisdictions, agencies and non-profit organizations in the provision of sufficient active recreation facilities and programs to meet the needs of the community. Orono will actively encourage all school districts to coordinate their programs and facilities and to open them to the public whenever feasible. Orono will actively support and cooperate with the Orono and Mound-Westonka School Districts in their community service recreation programs. The City will encourage planning for organized team sports on a community/sub-regional basis. Orono will work with public or non-profit groups to fund the acquisition and development of recreational and open space lands and facilities. (Supports Goals 1, 4, 5) 7. Orono will strive toward connectivity between the various park and open space facilities. The interrelationships between neighborhood parks, conservation areas and the rest of the park system should be strengthened through the proper location and use of green ways, trails, underpasses and overpasses. Trail connections should be provided to neighborhood parks to enable pedestrian access. Trail corridors/ easements will be incorporated at the edge of subdivisions and adjacent to major roadways. (Supports goal 3) 8. Orono will acquire additional public open space parcels as opportunities arise. The priority for CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 8 any acquisitions will be for ecologically significant lands that abut existing park land, land that provides improved access to existing parkland and trails or land that facilitates the development of the planned trail system. (Supports goals 2, 5, 6) 9. The City’s park dedication fund will be used for purchase of additional park land and/or for improvement of existing park land. Consistent with Minnesota Statutes, this fund will not be used for park maintenance or recreation operating expense. (Supports goal 6) 10. Where possible, recreational facilities will be designed to be barrier-free so that handicapped citizens have reasonable access to facilities. Orono will ensure that select new parks are constructed with accessibility in mind and to incorporate Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) design standards with projects to upgrade existing parks. (Supports goals 1, 3, 5) 11. Orono will maintain Lake Access for all residents. With shore land abutting a dozen separate bays in Lake Minnetonka, Orono has a commitment to maintaining access via the dedicated access corridors. It is the City’s intent to permanently retain for public use all existing lake access corridors and fire lanes, regardless of the current level of use or maintenance. (Supports goal 5) To this end, the City will follow these policies:  Requests for vacation of dedicated lake access right of ways will be evaluated carefully, in particular where equal or better lake accesses are not available nearby. The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public’s right to use of any such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated.  The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. 12. The city will conduct a periodic (10 year cycle) park usage and needs community wide survey to determine if residents’ needs are being met. (Supports goal 1) 13. The city will review the existing park and facilities conditions to identify needed maintenance upgrades and replacements. 14. The city will provide sufficient funding for the administration and maintenance of the existing parks, trials and open space system as part of the regular City budget levy. Other sources of park funding such as development park fees, grants, support from local organizations, private donations, will be used for acquisitions, capital improvements and major renovations. (Supports goal 6) CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 9 PARK, OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL ACTION PLAN The following paragraphs describe how Orono intends to act on the goals and policies of the previous section. Park Commission The Orono Park Commission serves as an advisory body appointed by the City Council to make recommendations about park, open space and trail issues. The Park Commission will continuously evaluate park, open space and trail facilities and community needs. This ongoing evaluation process allows for identification and prioritization of improvements; taking into account such factors as population growth, demographic changes, levels of facility use, health and safety factors, condition of facilities, special populations, adjacent land use compatibility, and life cycle recreation; invasive species removal and satisfaction of community needs. The Park Commission will monitor the parks, open space and trail systems to satisfactorily address the goals and policies of this plan. Focus Parks and Trails The Park Commission will focus on the following Park, trails, and recreational facilities. Big island In order to achieve the level of management needed to operate Big Island Park successfully, the City and Minnehaha Creek Watershed district created and adopted the Big Island Nature Park Management Plan, November, 2011. The management plan contains a vision and a series of goals for the park. The specific bullet points require additional clarification and coordination with the Plan. The proposed Comprehensive Plan for Orono 2040 will be a three-phase process as outlined below: Table 4E-6: Big Island Implementation Phase I: This Phase will focus on the making the park safe and accessible. • Clean up existing trails so they are passable for hiking. • Purchase and place a safe container for mowing and trail maintenance equipment. • Mow and maintain trails. • Establish controls for unauthorized use (snowmobiles) • Renovate existing structure (visitor center) • Evaluate Historical value • Create a plan to improve security. Phase II This Phase will focus on completing Goals in 2030 Comp Plan. • Establish a master plan for day use facilities, including but not limited to: bathrooms, shelter, viewing platform, picnic tables, historical marker, accessible paths, and a veteran’s memorial flag. • Clarify the Natural and Recreational Areas in the conservation easement. • Re-evaluate the Management Plan together with the MCWD and make revisions as needed. • Construct day use facilities • Provide access for those who are physically disabled. • Conduct a process involving all possible stakeholders to create a long-term Vision. • Establish a true Vision for the Orono Big Island Park (what should it look like in the year 2040?) Phase III This Phase will focus on the long-term potential of the park. • Create the partnerships required to implement the plan (MCWD, LMCD, surrounding cities, state of MN, Veterans groups, Three Rivers Park District, etc.) • Create a phased approach to the vision (masterplan) • Seek and obtain funding. • Implement the plan. CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 10 Golf Course The city will look to secure the long term viability of the Municipal Golf course through a series of capital improvements focusing on both golf and alternative recreational activities on the site. In 2017 the city under took the development of a mini-master plan to lay out options for the park. Future projects may include: Table 4E-7 Golf Course Implementation Priority Project Description 1 Porch/ Patio Includes porch for clubhouse 2 Cart Parking Run concurrent with Porch project as the porch project eliminates current cart parking. Includes retaining wall and pavement for cart parking. 3 Fest Tent Area Leveling and clearing a 40’x60’ area for placement of a fest tent to facilitate more events at the golf course 4 Fire Pit Natural gas fire pit area. 5 Lawn Bowling Project pending further analysis. Installation of a 30’ x 120’ 2 lane lawn bowling facility 6 Snow Tubing Hill w/Tow Rope Project pending further analysis. Installation of a tow rope and procurement of snow tubes. 7 Multi-Use Trail Project pending further analysis. Installation of a perimeter multiuse trail at the golf course. Annual Focus Parks In addition to specific City initiatives or activities supporting Big Island and the Orono Golf Course, the Park Commission will designate one or two of its Parks each year for special consideration as “Focus Parks”. In addition to normal maintenance activities, Focus Parks (neighborhood or community, recreational or natural) will be evaluated from a broader perspective, including potential capital investment. Examples for consideration could be:  Are there additional opportunities to increase use of the park (e.g. new trails or recreational facilities)?  Are special ecological or historical features of the park effectively featured?  Could the park benefit from more extensive removal of invasive species?  Are directional signs to the park and within the park adequate?  Are parking facilities appropriate for existing and proposed uses for the park? When designating a Focus Park, the Commission will also seek input from surrounding residents who could be impacted by changes in park use or investment. Recent examples of Focus Park designation included the conversion of the Susan E. Lurton Nature Area to include an off-leash dog park (2016-2017), extensive removal of invasive species, trail widening, new signage and benches at Saga Hill Nature Area (2017-2018), and potential new uses and improvements at Bederwood Community Park (2018-2019). CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 11 Trails The City recognizes that search areas for extensions to the Dakota Rail and the Lake Independence Trails are located, in part, within City of Orono boundaries. The city supports extensions and connections to these features where extensions can be made while being sensitive to environmental features. Map 4A- 6 shows the locations of all trails, and planned areas for expansion. Table 4E-8: Trail Implementation Priority Project Description 1 County Road 15 West of Navarre The city does not support an on-street trail on County Road 15 due to its close proximity to Dakota trail. 2 Navarre Dakota Trail Connection The city will actively partner with Hennepin county and Three Rivers park District to complete a trail connection along County Road 19 connecting Navarre to the Dakota Trail 3 Old Crystal Bay Road The city will support an off-street trail that provides access from the Luce Line Trail at Old Crystal Bay Road to the Dakota Trail at North Shore Drive. 4 Wayzata Blvd Trail The City is partnering with the city of Long Lake and Hennepin County to provide a multi modal trail along the north side of Wayzata Blvd from the Luce Line trial to the western Boundary of the Orono School Property. The trail is being included as part of the CSAH 112 Turn back Projects. 5 Lakeview Legacy Park The city will plan a trail that connects Lakeview Legacy Park to the County Road 19 trail as well as trails to the south that connect with the Dakota trail. 6 Hunter Drive/Ferndale The city will partner with the Hennepin County to connect the trails in northeast Orono to the Luce Line and Dakota Trails via Hunter Drive and Ferndale Road. 7 Lowry Woods The city will plan trail access to the Lowry Woods Park. 8 Old Long Lake Road The city does not support the addition of an off-street trail along Old Long Lake Road due to the nearby access to the Luce Line Trail in several locations. RESOURCING Operating and Maintenance Budget The City shall remain committed to fully funding the operations and maintenance needs of the City’s parks, trails and open space system. The majority of the resourcing will come from the General Fund Levy. The golf course and Lurton off Leash Park have separate funding sources for maintenance. The golf course is funded through greens fees and the off leash dog park through a combination the Lurton Park Fund and annual permit fees. Capital Improvement Plan The City manages capital expenditures at parks as part of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP provides long-term planning and management of infrastructure throughout the City. The CIP is a planning document that presents a 5+ year overview of scheduled capital projects to address the City’s goals for public infrastructure. The CIP includes a long-term financing plan that allows the City to allocate funds for these projects based on assigned priorities. The 5+ year horizon of the CIP provides the City with an opportunity to evaluate project priorities annually and to adjust the timing, scope and cost of projects as new information becomes available. The information contained in this plan represents an estimate of improvement costs based on present knowledge and expected conditions. Changes in community priorities, infrastructure condition and inflation rates require that adjustments be made on a routine basis. CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 12 Funding for Acquisition and Capital Improvements As Orono becomes fully developed over the next two decades, the amount of money collected via new development park dedication fees will decrease substantially. Funding for the acquisition of park lands and for improvement of existing facilities will require alternative sources of capital in the future. The City will continue to investigate mechanisms for future funding and will continue to encourage private donations of land or funds in order to maintain the level of active and passive recreation opportunities desired by Orono residents. Orono currently provides funding for park, open space and trail acquisitions and improvements by the following methods: Mandatory developer contributions of land or cash payments to the Park Dedication Fund at the time property is subdivided or developed; transfers from the City’s general fund; private contributions of land or funds; fees for use; and grants. )n )nGsWX GeWX GsWX GoWX GeWX GÞWX G½WX GoWX GoWX GÞWX GVWX112 GVWX135 GVWX146 )n GVWX110 Sp GïWX Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongLak e C reekMin n e h a h a C r e e k M inneh a ha CreekPainterCreek3R-2 DNR-2 O-7 O-24 S-2 S-1 O-12 O-20 DNR-4 DNR-1 O-17 3R-3 3R-1 O-18 O-4 MCWD-1 O-2 O-3 O-14 O-8 O-15 O-5 O-6 H-1 O-11 O-19 NC-1 O-9 O-10 O-13 O-1 O-16 DNR-3 PP-1 ThreePoin tsB l vdHighland Ave P eaveyRoad6thAveN Ferndale Road NCountyRoad19 N SunsetD rHunter DrRutledge Road Lynw ood Bl vd Commerce BlvdHighw ay 12 E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadS h o r e line D r 1 8 thAve N NArmDrBrownRoadNS h o r e line Dr Highway 7 Ferndale Road W Grandview Bl vd 19th Ave N FerndaleRoadSW ayc liffeNM inn e t o nka B lvd8th Ave N N Shore Dr Rice St E W atertownRoad 3rdAve N Wayzata Blvd E Lake St ExtensionWillow Dr N22n dAv eN BaysideRoad Count yR o ad 110W McGi n t y R o a d W W a y z a t a B l v d W Lakeview AveCounty Road 151 Grays B ayB lvdLake Ave Danie ls St Ma pl ewood RoadSparrowRoadLarchwoodDrGa me Farm R o a d E LakeStE Sunnyfield Road E Pkwy4th Ave N Av onDrPa i n t e r R o a d D e v on Dr P ar k Ave OrchardLn S h or ewood L n SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave N o r t h e r n A v e Halstea dLnDove LnHalsteadDrMan o rR o a d 2 0 th Ave N Rid g eview DrEOld Crystal Bay Road NFox St HeritageLnCounty Road 83Rai nbowDrLyric Ave 9thAve N Spring HillR oadW Branch Road Temp le Dr Arco l a LnCountyRoad15Eastw oodRoad5 thA veN Chimo W Moline Road Wayza t a B l v d W Drake Dr To go Roa d County Road 15 Tamarack DrIngerson RoadW Arm Dr Regent s W a lkGaleRoadPea vey Ln C ygnetPlBlair RoadTurner Road Linwoo d RoadKelly Ave VineHillRoadWestedge BlvdCounty Road 90Manito u RoadWilshireBlvd County Road 101S h a d ywoodRoad G leasonLakeRoadCrosbyRoadBartlettBlvd County Road 19Canterb u ryDrDonald Dr Dunkirk Ln NW illo wDrSLeaf StTonka w a R o a dMcCulleyRoad CountyRoad110NClover Cir Brown Road SI slan dViewDrEastmanLn Ed g e w ater Dr VicksburgLnNWPointRoadLafa y ette RoadBushawayRoadWoodhillRoa dLakevi e wPkwy Leroy StStubbs Bay Road NCas co Cir Troy L n N Hi l lside D rWPo l o ClubRoadMap Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_4E-A_ParksAndTrails_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/14/2018 3:40:20 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN Parks and TrailsNovember 2018 Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Parks and Trails Map 4E-1 Regional Trails Dakota RailRegional Trail LakeIndependenceRegional Trail LakeMinnetonka LRTRegional Trail Luce Line StateTrail Regional TrailSearch Corridors Regional Trails -2040 SystemAdditions Other Trails Off-Street On-Street Off-Street,Planned On-Street,Planned Local Sidewalks& Trails Orono Parks Regional Parksand Facilities Private \ PublicPark Orono PublicSchools Open Water ORONO PARK AND TRAIL SYSTEMO-1 Casco Point ParkO-2 Casco Point BeachO-3 Casco Point Ice RinkO-4 Lydiard BeachO-5 Livingston Tower ParkO-6 Antoine ParkO-7 Highwood ParkO-8 Sandy BeachO-9 Summit Park Swimming BeachO-10 Bederwood Park O-11 Hackberry Park O-12 Orono Golf Course O-13 Seven Nations ParkO-14 Navarre PlaygroundO-15 Crystal Bay PlaygroundO-16 Lowry WoodsO-17 French Creek PreserveO-18 Saga Hill PreserveO-19 Pleasant View ParkO-20 Big Island Nature ParkO-21 Lurton Off-Leash Dog Park PRIVATE / PUBLIC PP-1 Lakeview Legacy Park NATURE CONSERVANCY NC-1 Ferndale Marsh ORONO SCHOOL SYSTEM FACILITIESS-1 Orono School System FacilitiesS-2 Lee Carlson Baseball Fields DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR-1 Luce Line Trail DNR-2 Wolsfeld Woods Nature Area DNR-3 Maxwell Bay Lake Access DNR-4 Wood Hill Scientific & Natural Area MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICTMCWD-1 Wolsfeld Creek HENNEPIN COUNTYH-1 North Arm Boat Landing THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 3R-1 Noerenberg Gardens 3R-2 Baker Park Reserve 3R-3 Lake Minnetonka Islands Regional Park #* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #*#* #* #*#*#*#* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #*#* #*#*#*#* #* Cook'sBay SpringParkBay Carman'sBay HarrisonBay WestArm MaxwellBay NorthArm ForestLakeJenning'sBay StubbsBay LafayetteBay WayzataBayTanagerLake LakeClassen DickeyLake LongLake LydiardLake MooneyLake CascoPoint CrystalBay BohnsPoint SmithBay LakeMinnetonka BrownsBay BrackettsPoint FrenchMarsh KatrinaLake DutchLake LangdonLake LongLa k e CreekM inne h ahaCreek Pai n t e r C r e e k M in n e h a h a C r eek Paint er C reekGVWX15 GVWX16 GVWX15 GVWX112 GVWX84 GVWX135 GVWX101 GVWX110 GVWX146 GVWX125 GVWX5 GVWX151GVWX19 GVWX6 GVWX19 GVWX101 GVWX6 GVWX51 %&'(394 %&'(494 )*12 )*12 ?@A@7 ST26 ST201 M inne t o n kaD r Minnetonka Blvd WoodhillRoadT hreePointsB lvd Lake St Extension Orcha rd Roa d Highland Ave LynwoodBl vd P eaveyRoad6 t h Ave N Ferndale Road NCounty Road 19 NStar keyRoadRutledge Road 22 ndAve N Commerce BlvdHighway 12 E6thAveN TonkawoodRoadCountyRoad101Interstate 494Highw oo d D r N Arm Dr Williston RoadAzure RoadBrownRoadNShorelineDr Ferndale Road W 19th Ave N Man o rR o a d O akla n d RoadFerndaleRoadSInterstate394 High 8th Ave N NShore Dr StoneRoad Rice St E W atertownRoad G l e a so n L a k e D rCarlsonPkwyN21 s t A v e N 3rdAve N Wayzata Bl vd EWillow Dr NBayside Road W a y zata B lv d W Ke lley P k w y Lakeview AveCounty Road 151 Grays B ayB lvdRanchview Ln NLake Ave Daniels St Ma pl ewood RoadLakeStE Pkwy4th Ave N Av onDrD e v on Dr P ar k Ave S Ln OrchardLn S h or e w ood L n SteeleStPark St E Grand Ave N o r t h e r n A ve Vine StDove Ln2 0 th Ave N County Road 839thA v e NRidge v i e wDr EOld Crystal Bay Road NFox St OldLongL ake R o a dMinnehaha PlDay PlHeritageLnRainbowDrLyricAve W Branch R oad Ringer R oa dHunter DrWayzata Blvd Spring HillR oadTemp le Dr Arco l a LnCountyRoad15Crow n DrEastwoodRoad5thAveNChimoWWildhurstTrl Moline Road Tamarack DrWayza t a B l v d W To go Roa d W Arm Dr Regent s W a lkGaleRoadPea vey Ln C y gnetPlDrake Dr Turner Road Linwood RoadKelly Ave McGintyRoadW M an it o u R oadWilshireBlvd CountyRoad101ShadywoodRoad G leasonLakeRoadCrosbyRoadHarborLnNBa rtlett BlvdHighland RoadCounty Road 19Old Crystal Bay Road SVineHillRoadCanterbu r yDrDonald Dr LinnerRoadDunkirk Ln NW illo wDrSLeaf StHoldridg e Dr To n k a w a Ro a dMcCulleyRoadCo unty Road1 10N Victoria StBrownRoadSI slan dViewDrEastmanLn Niagara Ln NEd g e w ater Dr Vicksburg Ln NWPointRoadLafa y ette RoadBushawayRoadWoodhillR oadLakeview Pkwy Leroy StStubbs Bay Road NSussex DrTroy L n N Hi l lside D rW18thA v e N 2 1 34 5 6 7 8 9 10 111213 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 222324 2526 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 A B CD E FG HI 1A Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\C13114814\ESRI\Maps\LandUse\ORNO_4E-B_LakeAccessPoints_11x17L.mxd | Date Saved: 11/9/2018 3:27:44 PM2040 Comprehensive PlanOrono, MN November 2018Lake Access Points Legend City Limits 2040 MUSA Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500FeetSource: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT !I Lake Access Points #*Lake AccessPoints Map w4 a yE 7 -2 Appendix 4E-A: Park Histories and Details. Park Name: Antoine Park Classification: Neighborhood Park Location: 1780 Concordia Street Size (in acres): 1.3 Description: Mainly open parkland with some large deciduous trees. Facilities: Playground Sign Picnic Tables Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential Restrictions or Conditions: Park sign must read "Roberta Lee Antoine Playground" in the name of the donor. History / Notes: The property was donated to the city in 1974 by Roberta Lee Antoine. Until 1995 a recreational ice skating rink was maintained at the park. The abandoned buildings on the property were previously used to store the city's docks during the winter. Some winters and for the annual neighborhood picnic, area residents use one of the buildings as shelter. The Park Commission on January 6, 1997 recommended installation of new playground equipment. The Commission also requested that the City evaluate the existing buildings for a possible use as a picnic shelter, warming house or for their removal. The buildings were removed. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 17-117-23 22 0026 1.30 Donation in 1974 from Mary Antoine Park Name: Bederwood Classification: Community Playfield Location: 55 Stubbs Bay Road Size (in acres): 9.05 Description: Mainly open parkland with a scattering of smaller trees throughout the terrain while older deciduous trees surround the park along its borders, a Little League baseball field is located nearly in the center of the park; park is located near a small residential neighborhood Facilities: Baseball field Playground Benches Picnic tables Temporary chemical toilet facilities Gravel parking for park & Trail (approximately 25 to 30 vehicles) Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential / Luce Line State Trail Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Orono Baseball Association, trail users. Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: A 4" well has been constructed to provide drinking water and for flooding the ice skating rink. Improvements and equipment were funded through CDBG (community development block grant) funds and park dedication. A soccer field was proposed in the original plans for the park that was to be located in the north part of the parcel. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 05-117-23 21 0001 8.75 City purchased in 1974 05-117-23 21 008 TF 0.30 1979 Transfer from DNR to City Park Name: Casco Point Beach Classification: Public Lake Access/Beach Location: Off Casco Point Rd. on Carmen Rd Size (in acres): 0.3 Description: Narrow strip of land that was originally a street used as a water access point to fill fire trucks with water. Park is situated between two residential lake shore properties. Facilities: Bike rack Picnic Table Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Neighborhood residents Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: Casco Point Beach is a narrow strip of land 60 feet wide and 235 feet long between 2871 and 2879 Casco Point Road on Spring Park Bay. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired Dedicated ROW 0.3 Dedicated right-of-way (“Carman Ave.”) in the plat of ‘Spring Park’ (1881) Park Name: Casco Point Ice Rink Classification: Special Use Area Location: On Casco Point Rd. before Dunwoody Ave. and one block south of Shoreline Dr. Size (in acres): 3.1 Description: The majority of the land is now open space which abuts an adjoining wetland area, an open area used as an ice rink occupies the front of the park. The park is heavily wooded in the rear. Facilities: Ice Rink Parking Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 20-117-23 21 0022 3.00 Purchased by City in 1966 Park Name: Casco Point Park Classification: Community Park Location: Casco Point Circle Size (in acres): 8.25 Description: Heavily wooded lot with several meadows and gradually sloping terrain located at the tip of Casco Point, park has one low lying area that acts as a catch basin; passive conservation area Facilities: Sign Mowed Areas Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Restrictions or Conditions: The deed to the property, dated December 30, 1971, specifies that the conveyed premises shall be maintained as an open space natural woodland, that no buildings may be constructed, no recreational facilities inconsistent with the retention and preservation of the land, and no construction of a parking lot, washroom facility and/or other permanent structures. Notes: Casco Point Park is an 8 acre park at the end of Casco Point Road. It is left in its natural state and only mowed 3-4 times per year. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 20-117-23 43 0031 8.50 Quit-claim deeded to City in 1971 by Casco Point residents Park Name: Crystal Bay Park Classification: Neighborhood Park Location: 1335 Brown Road South Size (in acres): 2.39 Description: Flat terrain with a division in park space, between the playground area and the open space by a row of tall evergreens. The park shares a parking lot with the Crystal Bay Post Office. Facilities: Playground Park benches Picnic tables Park identification sign Well Small Basket Ball Court Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: This playground was developed using park dedication and CDBG funds. The portion of the park area north of the Post Office was converted into a park by the City when they demolished the old city administrative and public works buildings in 1993. Open space on the north side of the park may at some time in the future be developed into an ice rink PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 10-117-23 31 0024 10-117-23 31 0025 10-117-23 31 0026 10-117-23 31 0027 10-117-23 31 0097 10-117-23 31 0101 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.90 0.87 Orig. Village Hall site, acquired 1906 Purchased 1920 Purchased 1944 Purchased 1944 Purchased 1958-67 (4 parcels total) Purchased 1974-1980 (3 lots) Park Name: Livingston Tower Park Classification: Mini-park Location: Corner of Livingston and Blaine streets Size (in acres): 0.2 Description: Very small parcel with pine trees and three benches Facilities: Picnic Tables Benches Bike Rack Historical/Information Signs Paver Patio Flower Gardens Adjacent Land Use: Single and multi-family residential. Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: Sculpted bird bath was constructed with funds from Westonka Lions and park dedication funds for the city by a local artist. Park was rehabilitated in 2015. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 17-117-23 34 0048 0.20 Dedicated as ‘Park Outlot’ in plat of ‘Navarro’ (1982) Park Name: Seven Nations Natural Area Classification: Community Park Location: Watertown Rd Size (in acres): 3.04 Description: Truncated piece of property that has slightly rolling terrain located within the Thoroughbred subdivision Facilities: Parking Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: There have been claims of a connection of the land with Native American groups. Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 04-117-23 12 0020 3.04 Acquired in 1994 via Park Dedication from development of Old Crystal Bay Road Addition Park Name: French Creek Preserve Classification: Community Park Location: 898 Old Crystal Bay Road South Size (in acres): 33.9 Description: About 7 acres of the dedicated portion are wetland wildlife and about 4 acres are prairie land preserve. The 7 acres open pond (which 20 years ago was once a sewer pond) is from 1.5 feet to 4 feet in depth and is surrounded by wetlands on the east and south. The NW corner of the 4 acres is a restored prairie which rises up slightly from the pond. Facilities: Gravel parking for approximately 8 to 10 Vehicles Benches Restored prairie Trails Park identification sign Information signs Adjacent Land Use: Mostly open space, some single family residences Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: There has been some discrepancy on determining how many acres the preserve actually holds, the city dedicated the northern portion of the property as parkland, which has been noted in records as being approximately 11 acres. Another portion of the preserve which fell into tax forfeiture makes up approximately 19 more acres; the whole property of Outlot A has been estimated around 30 acres. The park opened in the Fall of 1994. The City has set aside the NW 4 acres. The City transferred $90,000.00 from the City's park dedication account to the general fund for the purchase of this land. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 09-117-23 11 0007 09-117-23 12 0009 32.7 1.15 Acquired for sewer plant (1963) Park dedication as part of plat of French Creek Woods (1995) Park Name: Hackberry Park Classification: Community Playfields Location: 126 Hackberry Hill Size (in acres): 3.58 Description: Terraced terrain, upper west side has play equipment and ice rink, lower east contains two ballfields. A residential house is situated in the middle half of the western portion. Facilities: Playground Half size basketball court 2 T-ball fields Soccer field Picnic tables Chemical toilets Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Orono Baseball Association Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: This park was developed with the assistance of the Minnetonka Optimists Club, Community Development Block Grant Funds and Park Dedication Funds. The City Purchased the residential property at 140 Hackberry Hill with living mortgage in 2016. The ice rink stopped being maintained in 2016 due to lake of use. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 33-118-23 44 0003 33-118-23 44 0004 33-118-23 44 0006 33-118-23 44 0007 33-118-23 44 0034 0.51 0.52 0.53 0.41 1.61 City purchased in 1971 City purchased in 1971 City purchased in 1967 City purchased in 1967 Dedicated as Park in plat of ‘Daniels Long Lake Heights” (1950) Park Name: Highwood Park Classification: Community park Location: North of North Shore Dr. Size (in acres): 13.69 Description: Nature trail area that is surrounded by single- family residential housing. Facilities: Gravel parking lot Trails Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: MnDNR for Parcel 0057 Restrictions or Conditions: Notes: Highwood was purchased by the city in 1971. The area has been left in itss natural state with the exception of a walking trail that was developed. Several species of birds, ground hogs, fox and deer are common in this area. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 07-117-23 44 0074 07-117-23 44 0059 TF 07-117-23 44 0058 TF 07-117-23 44 0057 07-117-23 44 0056 TF 07-117-23 44 0055 TF 07-117-23 44 0054 TF 07-117-23 44 0053 TF 07-117-23 41 0002 TF 07-117-23 41 0003 11.29 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.12 0.23 0.23 0.32 0.60 Purchased by City in 1971 Tax forfeit 1988 Tax forfeit 1980 (Owned by MnDNR) Tax forfeit ? Tax forfeit 1988 Tax forfeit 1988 Tax forfeit 1988 Tax forfeit 1991 part of 1971 purchase? Park Name: Lowry Woods Classification: Community Park Location: South of the Luce Line Trail between the roads of Luce Line Ridge and Cristofori Circle Size (in acres): 14.1 Description: Isolated and currently land-locked parcel of land. It is heavily forested along with rolling to steep terrain. The property is densely vegetated with deciduous trees and contains a segment of old growth Oak, Maple and Basswood forest. There is also a small evergreen mix of Pine varieties. Facilities: None Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: Conveyance from Nature Conservancy requires that the City of Orono maintain the property in a natural state. No development except trails is allowed. Notes: Lowry Woods is a Big Woods remnant of the Old Maple Basswood forests once found throughout the area. The forest is available for research by scientists or for nature walks and study. Mr. and Mrs. Lowry donated the 14 acres of land to the Nature Conservancy in 1965 for use as a natural area with the idea that if it became inappropriate to be held as a natural area it could be sold. The proceeds must be used to purchase another natural area. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 31-118-23 43 0009 14.1 Donated to Nature Conservancy by Mrs. Lowry in 1964; conveyed to Orono in 1994 Park Name: Lydiard Beach Classification: Lake Access/Beach Location: At the east end of Lydiard Ave Size (in acres): .85 Description: Narrow strip of land 66 feet wide. Parking lot is near the beach area. Area is adjacent to lagoons which serves as small marinas for Walters Port Lane and Carman Road residents. Facilities: Sand beach Bike rack Gravel parking lot Picnic Table gate and fence Buoys. Signs Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: PIDs Acres How and When Acquired Dedicated ROW 0.70 Dedicated right-of-way in the plat of ‘Townsite of Langdon Park’ (1893) Park Name: Navarre Playground Classification: Neighborhood Park Location: 3408 Lyric Ave Size (in acres): 1.08 Description: Small park along busy intersection. Located near both commercial and residential areas. Facilities: Playground Benches Picnic Tables Half court Basket Ball Information Signs Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential and Commercial Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: Original improvements and playground equipment were funded through CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) and park dedication funds in the 1970's. This is one of the only playgrounds located in the most densely populated southwest corner of Orono. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 17-117-23 43 0078 17-117-23 43 0079 17-117-23 43 0080 17-117-23 43 0081 17-117-23 43 0082 17-117-23 44 0008 17-117-23 44 0015 0.31 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.03 0.14 0.19 City purchased in 2004 Tax forfeit 1979 Tax forfeit 1979 Tax forfeit 1979 Old Right of Way Tax forfeit 1982 Tax forfeit 1980 Park Name: Orono Golf Course Classification: Special Use Area Location: 265 Orono Orchard Road South Size (in acres): 45.63 Description: 9 hole Golf Course on rolling hills. Facilities: Golf course Club house Parking lot (approximately 35-40 vehicles) Adjacent Land Use: Single-family residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Golfers Sledding and Cross country skiers in the winter Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: The Orono Golf Course is a picturesque nine-hole course with varying topography, elevated greens, mature trees, and a wooded buffer on the course perimeter. It was founded in 1924, and has the distinction of being the first public golf course in Minnesota with grass greens. In 2017 the parks commission had a master plan prepared to look at both golf related and other recreational future opportunities. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 02-117-23 22 0005 45.63 Purchased by City in 1967 Park Name: Pleasant View Classification: Community Park Location: Mahpiyata Island (west island of Big Island) Size (in acres): 1.25 Description: Largely natural and undeveloped land Facilities: None Adjacent Land Use: Single-family cottages Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: Island residents use park to access each other and water. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired Dedicated parkland 1.25 Dedicated in plat of ‘Pleasant View Lake Minnetonka’ (1888) Park Name: Saga Hill Classification: Nature/Conservation Area Location: Located along the west side of the Wildhurst Trail about 1/3 mile north of Tonkaview Lane. Size (in acres): 28.96 Description: The park is also a wooded site. Facilities: Parking Lot Trails Benches Information Signs Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: DNR Restrictions or Conditions: Conservation Easement The DNR portion "(a) The Property shall be managed and maintained consistent with the purpose and type of property acquired using appropriate management and protection practices to protect the natural and/or scenic resources; and (b) This part of the Property may not be used for any other purpose without the express written approval of the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (the 'DNR')." This declaration shall be binding and run with the property for a period of twenty (20) years and shall be automatically renewed for consecutive ten (10) year periods. Tax forfeiture parcel has no use restrictions. Notes: The portion of the park with the DNR restrictions was purchased from Midway Bank in St. Paul. Area residences raised the funds for this and were successful due to anonymous donor. The park was restored in 2017. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 07-117-23 22 0007 07-117-23 22 0008 07-117-23 23 0019 07-117-23 23 0029 07-117-23 23 0034 07-117-23 23 0020 07-117-23 23 0021 07-117-23 23 0022 3.43 3.45 1.46 8.70 0.70 1.72 1.88 1.91 Purchased 1999 Purchased 1999 ‘Sollner Properties’¹ Purchased 1999 Tax forfeit 1998 Tax forfeit 2008 Purchased 1996 Purchased 1996 Purchased 1996 Park Name: Sandy Beach Classification: Lake Access/Beach Location: At end of Maple Place on North Arm Bay Size (in acres): 0.28 Description: Narrow stretch of lake access.. Facilities: Bike rack Picnic Table City information sign Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: PIDs Acres How and When Acquired Dedicated ROW 0.28 Dedicated right-of-way in the plat of ‘Crystal Bay View’ (1891) Park Name: Summit Park Beach Classification: Lake Access/Beach Location: 455 East Long Lake Road Size (in acres): 4.56 Description: Park is somewhat secluded off of East Long Lake Road, park consists of a small beach area with a dock, a wooded picnic area, a canoe launch and a wetland area toward the north side of the parcel. Facilities: Gravel parking lot (10 to 15 vehicles) Picnic tables Canoe storage rack Seasonal chemical toilets Park identification sign Adjacent Land Use: Single-Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: None Notes: City Beach property on Long Lake was donated to the city by Bruce Dayton. This park is close to the Wood Rill Scientific and Natural Area which was donated to the Department of Natural Resources by Bruce and Ruth Dayton. Motorized boat access to the park is not allowed. Park Name: Susan B Lurton Park Classification: Special Use Location: 3589 Wayzata Blvd Size (in acres): 39 Description: Off Leash Dog Park Facilities: Parking Trails Toilet Well Picnic Tables Information Signs Benches Adjacent Land Use: Single Family Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Lurton Family Restrictions or Conditions: Restrictive covenants were established that limit improvements. Hunting and ballfields are specifically prohibited on the property. Notes: “Lurton Park Property” is the former C. W. Gordon farmstead located on the southwestern shore of Lake Classen and originally established in the nineteenth century. The 39-acre property was donated to the City by William and Susan Lurton in 2000 for use as a passive, natural environmental park. The park was transformed into and off leach dog park in 2017. Park Maintenance is provided through a special Lurton Park Fund and through user fees. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 32-118-23 12 0001 30.45 Donation in 2000 by Bill and Sue Lurton Park Name: Big Island Nature Park Classification: Community Park Location: Big Island, Lake Minnetonka Size (in acres): 56 Description: Facilities: Docks Beach Small Building Trails Adjacent Land Use: Season Recreational Cabins Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Restrictions or Conditions: A majority of the site is in a Conservation Easement. The park is managed under the Big Island Management plan, 2011. The park has it own section in the city Code Article IV, Sections 22-111 thru 116 Notes: The Park is intended to serve a dual role in preservation of a unique natural setting while offering the public a variety of passive recreational opportunities. The land on which the Park lies has a rich history of recreational use that today’s casual passerby might never have imagined. It was home to an amusement park in the early 1900s operated by the Twin City Rapid Transit Company This regional attraction lasted only 6 seasons before it closed and was eventually dismantled. Remnants of the grandeur of the Big Island Amusement Park can still be found on the site, including the grand entry portal stairway and old foundation remnants hidden among the Island’s wooded glens. In 1923 the property became the Big Island Veterans Camp, offering camping and other recreational opportunities to Minnesota’s war veterans. Use of the camp by veterans and their families continued until 2003, when the Vets Camp Board of Governors voted to dispose of the property and use the proceeds for other veterans needs throughout Minnesota. The City of Orono stepped up and in partnership with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District obtained a grant from the State of Minnesota to purchase the property for park purposes. PIDs Acres How and When Acquired 23-117-23 21 0001 23-117-23 22 0001 14-117-23 34 0001 46.12 4.67 5.66 City purchase in 2006 with $2M State/$3M City/$850K MCWD Name: Lake Access Point 2 Classification: Lake Access Location: Spates Avenue at Shoreline Facilities: Gravel access lane Adjacent Land Use: Comercial and Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Marina at 1955 Shoreline Restrictions or Conditions: Winter Access Only Notes: Name: Lake Access Point 4 Classification: Lake Access Location: North Shore Drive at Baldur Park Road between 3498/3510 Facilities: 30 ft wide graveled lane Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: Winter access Only Notes: Name: Lake Access Point 6 Classification: Lake Access Location: Crystal Bay Road Facilities: 66' wide platted road extending to lakeshore. City also owns 4 adjacent tiny lakeshore parcels to the east for an additional 200' of shoreline Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Local property owners Restrictions or Conditions: A number of inland private parcels claim deeded access rights for “boating and bathing” Notes: Name: Lake Access Point 9 (Gibbs Landing) Classification: Lake Access Location: Adjacent to/ west of 3125 Fox Street. Facilities: Trail to Lake Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Owner of 3125 Fox Street Restrictions or Conditions: Pedestrian access year-round, vehicles winter only Notes: Tax records show access as Out lot A, owned by owner of 3125, City has easement over Out lot, Name: Lake Access Point 10 Classification: Lake Access Location: East Lake Street between 3424 and 3465 Facilities: 30’ platted roadway Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: Winter access Only Notes: Name: Lake Access 11 Classification: Lake Access Location: Bayside Road at Stubbs Bay Road Facilities: Fishing Dock Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: Summer Fishing Dock Winter Snowmobile Acess Notes: Name: Lake Access 14 Classification: Lake Access Location: South end of West Lake Street Facilities: None Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: Walking Access Only Notes: Drainage way for Est Lake Street. Name: Lake Access 15 Classification: Lake Access Location: Park Lane between 607 and 649 Facilities: Fishing Dock Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: Notes: 60' wide platted road, paved to shoreline -usable for boat launch but there is no parking available Name: Lake Access 22 Classification: Lake access Location: Loma Linda Avenue beween 1098 and 1130 Facilities: Fishing Dock Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: Notes: 40' wide platted road; also useful for vehicular access Name: Lake Access 34 Classification: Lake access Location: Corral Road between 1785 and 1825 Concordia Street Facilities: None Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: Walking access only Notes: Mainly used as a drainage way. Name: Lake access #38 / Ivy Lane Classification: Lake Access Location: Ivy Place between 3486 and 3508 Facilities: 60' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline east of Ivy Place Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: None Restrictions or Conditions: Pedestrian Access Notes: Steep, used for drainage Name: Lake Access 39 / Spring Street Classification: Lake access Location: Between2600/2618 Casco Pt Rd. from Casco Point Road to shoreline along south side of plat of “KasterCove” Facilities: 40' wide platted road right-of-way Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Used by 2618 Casco Point road to access lakeshore portion of property. Restrictions or Conditions: Walking Access only Notes: Name: Lake Access #40 Classification: Lake Acess Location: Between 2470 Carman/3555 Frederick. Facilities: 30' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, fishing dock Adjacent Land Use: Residential Special use Groups/ Stakeholders: Restrictions or Conditions: Notes: < 1 acre May be publicly or privately owned and/or incorporated into a development site, such as apartment, < 25 acres Physical geography suited for intense development. Proximity to elementary schools or residential neighborhoods. 25 - 50 acres Physical geography suited for intense development. Proximity to secondary schools and other public facilities. 25 - 100 acres Proximity to community facilities and resources. Sit Att ib t & L tiNatural resources that merit preservation and that would be negatively affected by development. On- or off-road trails that may or may not traverse scenic areas while assuring the trail treadway has no adverse effect on the natural resource base. Developed or undeveloped public right of way. On- or off-road trails that may or may not traverse scenic areas while assuring the trail treadway has no adverse effect on the natural resource base. Affords natural features with varied physical geographic interest. Proximity to community facilities and resources and/or where resource occurs. Complete natural setting contiguous to water bodies or watercourses where possible. Where natural resource occurs-particularly water. Diversity of unique resources, such as topography, lakes, streams, marshes, flora, fauna. Where natural resource occurs. When feasible, off-road trails that utilize human made and/or natural linear resources such as utility corridors, railroad and highway rights of way, stream / river valleys, or at the edges of forest or prairie. On-road trails are acceptable when off-road trails are not feasible. Preferably adjacent to high-quality natural areas. The trail treadway should be placed where it has no adverse impact on the natural resource base. When feasible, linking trails should attempt to connect to population, economic and social centers along its route. Specific standard applicable to desired feature. Area that preserves,maintains and provides specialized or single purpose activities Special recreation feature Appendix B Park Classification and Definitions1 Area developed for one or more varying modes of non-motorized recreational travel such as hiking, biking, horseback riding, cross-country skiing, and canoeing. Area of natural quality for nature-oriented outdoor recreation such as viewing and studying nature, wildlife habitat, conservation, swimming, picnicking, hiking, boating, camping and trail uses. Area of natural or ornamental quality for nature- oriented outdoor recreation such as picnicking, boating, fishing, swimming, camping and trail uses. Regional park Regional park reserve Regional destination & linking trails The entire metropolitan region Sufficient corridor width and length to accommodate trail. Specialized facilities that serve a concentrated or limited population or specific group such as tots or senior citizens. Area for intense recreational activities such as field games, court games, crafts, apparatus area, skating, and neighborhood centers. Area for intense recreational facilities such as athletic fields and swimming pools; could include a neighborhood use. Area of natural or ornamental quality for outdoor recreation such as walking, viewing, sitting, picnicking; could have some field and court games. 3 - 5 communities 200 - 500 acres County, multi-county area 1000+ acres Appropriate to particular special recreation feature. Sited where most advantageous for the special recreation feature and the overall park system. Regional Facilities County park Area of natural or ornamental quality for outdoor recreation such as walking, viewing, sitting, picnicking; could have some field and court games. County 25 - 100 acres Community Lake access2 These areas provide access to lakes for activities such as swimming, boating, fishing, snowmobiling, walking skiing, snowshoeing and winter vehicular lake access. 3 - 5 neighborhoods or one community <1 Acre County linear parks, trail, corridors and parkways Area developed for one or more varying modes of recreational travel such as hiking, biking, snowmobiling, horseback riding, cross-country skiing, canoeing and driving. Several cities and/or townships in a county Traverses one or more municipalities. Width and length minimums vary by county. Conservancy lands Area of natural quality such as watercourses and wetlands that are preserved for environmental or aesthetic benefits to the community and/or because of the negative environmental or economic effects of development in them. Municipality, township, county or state Variable, based on extent of resources. Local linear parks, trail, corridors and parkways Area developed for one or more varying modes of recreational travel such as hiking, biking, snowmobiling, horseback riding, cross-country skiing, canoeing and driving. A neighborhood or several neighborhoods in a city or township Contained within one city or township. Width and length minimums vary by locality. Si Neighborhood park/ playground ¼ to ½ mile radius to serve a population of 4,000 – 5,000 (one neighborhood) Community playfield 3 - 5 neighborhoods or one community Community park 3 - 5 neighborhoods or one community Ct U SiA Mini-park Less than 1/4 mile radius 1from Met council Parks Definitions 2City of Orono Definition Appendix 4E-B ID Access Name Between UPDATED 4/2/01; UPDATED 5/21/08; UPDATED 1/26/18 # or Street NameAddress #sNotes1 End of Orono Lane2-S 1355/1385 No public accessNot open for public use; plat map indicates questionable abutment of shoreline1a Shoreline Drive - “Molly’s Corner” (Outlot A, Dragonfly Hill)2-SAcross from 1410 ShorelineShore Fishing Hennepin County provides an informal parking area and trashcans at this wide spot along Shoreline Drive; popular fishing spot; winter vehicular access feasible2 Shoreline Drive at Spates 10-S Adj to 1955 Winter Only Gated in summer; winter vehicular access allowed. As of 2016 privately owned with city easment for lake acess and sanitary back up generator.3 North Shore Drive at Shoreline Drive 10-SNo public access Tracts S&U, RLS 192; these tracts are on the steep slope adjacent to Shoreline Drive; due to slope and safety issues this access point is not open for public use4 North Shore Drive at Baldur Park Road8-S 3498/3510 Winter Only 30' wide platted road right-of-way5 Shadywood Road at Sunset Dr 17-N 1998/2000 drainage way 15.2' wide platted alley - closely abutting homes on either side6 Crystal Bay Road (West end) 17-S Adj to 2264 ShadywoodPedestrian Access / Bathing66' wide platted road extending to lakeshore; City also owns 4 adjacent tiny lakeshore parcels to the east for an additional 200' of shoreline, over which a number of inland private parcels claim deeded access rights for “boating and bathing”.7 Crystal Bay Road (Relocated extension of Bayview Place in plat of “Wallace’s Addition...”)17-S 3405/3415 Pedestrian Access20' relocated alley from Railroad property to shoreline; potential lake access from railway corridor. The only known documentation is Doc. #507616 deed filed Nov. 10, 1908 from Wallace et al to Priebe which states that the 20' strip is “heretofore taken for street purposes” and notes that the platted alley between Lots 18 and 19 was vacated by the District Court8 Crystal Bay Road (Platted extension of Hillside Place)17-S 3339/3345 Utilities 25' wide platted roadway; contains municipal sewer lines, potential access from neighborhood and Railroad/Trail corridor to lakeshore9 Gibbs Landing - Fox St.4-S Adj to 3125 Pedestrian year-round, vehicles winter onlyTax records show access as Outlot A, owned by owner of 3125, City has easement over Outlot, City maintains access10 Eastlake Street 5-N 3424/3465 Winter Only 30' platted road gated March 1 - Dec. 111 Bayside Rd. at Stubbs Bay Rd. 5-N 3580/3640 Fishing Dock 33' platted road (“Oak Street” in plat of “Bay View Park”) Also used for winter access by snowmobiles off Luce Line12 Bayside Rd5-N Across from 3640, 3700, 3750 BaysideNo public access Two 60' platted roads and one 65' platted road to the Lake (Park, Spring, and Maple Streets in plat of Bay View Park; and Theresa St. in plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka). These potential access points are not opened for public use.13 Bayside Rd. 5-N West side of 3775 BaysideNo public access 30' realigned platted road (Realigned “Lake Street” in the plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka) (See street file 3775 Bayside). Not opened for public use.14 Westlake Street 5-N 372/389 Pedestrian Access30' platted road right-of-way extending to lakeshore; walking access only.Stubbs BayMaxwell Bay City of Orono Lake Minnetonka Access Points - Designated Use and Current Status Plat SectionDesignated UseBrown’s Bay (Lower Lake)Smith Bay (Lower Lake)Crystal BayAppendix 4E-C Lake Access List ID Access Name Between UPDATED 4/2/01; UPDATED 5/21/08; UPDATED 1/26/18 # or Street Name Address #s Notes15 Park Lane 6-S 607/649 Fishing Dock 60' wide platted road, paved to shoreline - usable for boat launch but there is no parking available16 Oak Street 6-S Adj to 4119 drainage way 30' wide platted road, not developed, steep slopes and ravine limit use17 Baldur Park Road 8-S Across from 1384/1392Winter Access NW end of platted developed road as it extends to shoreline18 Oak Place (Platted road in plat of “Crystal Bay View”)8-S 3768/3818 North Shore DrNo public access 40' wide platted undeveloped road extending from North Shore Drive across platted Cherry Ave to shoreline; mostly wetland or under water, Encroached by shared driveway19 Sandy Beach (Extension of Maple Place)8-S 3898/3908 Cherry AveSwimming Beach60' wide platted roadway used for City beach20 Grant Street 8-S1310 Spruce/1330 Cherry PlDrainage way 50' wide platted road, undeveloped21 Spruce Place 8-S 1250/1260 No public access 40' wide (remaining after partial vacation) platted roadway, undeveloped, Encroached22 Loma Linda Avenue 8-N 1098/1130 Fishing Dock 40' wide platted road; also useful for vehicular access23 Forest Lake Landing 7-N 4415/4440 Pedestrian Access60' wide platted road right-of-way , access not developed, walking use only. Encroachments present24 Elmwood Avenue 7-N South of 1199 drainage way 20' wide platted road/alley undeveloped right-of-way leading to shoreline25 “Summit Avenue” (Extension of Elmwood Avenue)7-S 1067/1101 drainage way utilities50' wide platted road undeveloped right-of-way to shoreline, drainage way26 “Buff Street” 7-S West side of 1453 Park Drdrainage way 50' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline, not developed, drainage way27 North Shore Drive west end (adjacent to Orono/M’trista border)7-S “4795" Shorelinedrainage way33' platted right-of-way corridor extension of Co. Rd. 19 plus tax-forfeited Lot 10, Block 6, “Bergquist and Wicklund’s Park...”; undeveloped corridor primarily for drainage purposes due to very steep slopes28 North Shore Drive at “Adams Street” Extension7-S 4731/4745drainage way40' platted road right-of-way extension in plat of “Bergquist and Wicklund’s Park...” undeveloped, very steep, used for drainage29 Rest Point Lane 7-S 1340/1345 Pedestrian Access33' platted right-of-way corridor, pavement does not extend to lake30 Rest Point Road 7-S 1405/1410 Pedestrian Access16' platted road right-of-way widens to about 40' at shoreline, paved but no boat launching available31 Orchard Beach Place 7-S West of 1530 Pedestrian Access50' platted road right-of-way extends to shoreline; tree growth and topography limits vehicular access32 Highwood Lane Extension 7-S 4156/4167 Highwood Rddrainage way20' platted alley right-of-way to shoreline; steep slope to shoreline, undeveloped33 Highwood Road Alley 7-S 4051/4075drainage way20' platted alley right-of-way to shoreline, not developed34 Corral Road Extension 17-N 1785/1825 Concordiadrainage way pedestrian access20' platted alley mainly for drainage but also walking access35 Fagerness Point Accretions 18-NAcross from 1965/1985 Fagerness Pt RdNo public access Accretions to the 40' originally platted road in the plat of “Fagerness”; title registrations by most abutting owners have resulted in dedicated right-of-way no longer abutting shoreline; it appears that there is no public access remainingNorth Arm BayPlat SectionDesignated UseForest LakeWest Arm Bay ID Access Name Between UPDATED 4/2/01; UPDATED 5/21/08; UPDATED 1/26/18 # or Street Name Address #s Notes36 Casco Point Beach 20-S 2871/2879 Casco Pt RdSwimming Beach60' wide platted road (“Carman St”) used as a City swimming beach37 Casco Circle 20-S 3195/3205drainage way60' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline at the south side of Casco Circle - undeveloped38 “Ivy Lane” (Ivy Place) 20-S 3486/3508drainage way60' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline east of Ivy Place - steep, used for drainage39 “Spring Street” 20-S 2600/2618Casco Point RdPedestrian Access40' wide platted road right-of-way from Casco Point Road to shoreline along south side of plat of “Kaster Cove” - undeveloped, walking access only40 Carman Street 20-S2490 Carman/ 3555 FrederickFishing dock30' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, fishing dock41 Lydiard Beach 20-S End of Lydiard Rd Swimming Beach66' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, used as a City swimming beachA N. End of “Lawn Avenue” 23-N11033' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 46, Morse Island ParkB E. end of “Tooisit Avenue” 23-N110/12033' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 45, Morse Island Park - slope makes use difficultC Unnamed Street 23-N120/14090' wide platted roadway between Lots 38 and 39, Morse Island Park - City has established drivable gravel road for emergency & service vehicle accessD “Bay Place” 23-N210/26050' +/- wide platted roadway between Lots 21 and 54, Morse Island ParkE “Meadow Lane East Extended” 23-S280/29020' wide platted roadway between Lots 59 and 60, Morse Island Park - steep slope makes use difficultF “Meta-Comet Avenue South” 23-S34033' wide platted roadway between Lot F Morse Island Park and Lot 3, Morse Island Park 2nd AdditionG “Massasolt Avenue West End” 23-S440/45033' wide platted roadway between Lot 1, Morse Island Park and Lot 1, Scrivers subdivision of Lot E, Morse Island Park - steep slopeH “Meadow Lane Alley” 23-S450/46016' platted alley between Lots 5 and 6, Morse Island Park - drivable for emergency and service vehiclesI “Pleasant View Street” 22-S570/60030' platted roadway between Lot 9, Pleasant View Lake Minnetonka and Lot 3, Island PointeBig IslandSpring Park BayCarmans Bay Plat SectionDesignated Use CMP Part 5. Plan Implementation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 5 Plan Implementation Comprehensive Plan Adoption and amendment 5-2 Implementation 5-4 Capital Improvement Program 5-5 Summary of Projected Capital Improvements 5-6 Intergovernmental Coordination 5-7 Appendices Map 5-1 Zoning Map Appendix 5-A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Appendix 5-B Comprehensive Plan Survey CMP Part 5. Implementation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 2 CMP Part 5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTION AND AMENDMENT The basic goals and philosophies contained in the 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Guide Plan were continued in subsequent plans and are still the backbone of this 2020-2040 CMP. This update has been drafted by City Staff with input from an Advisory Committee established to advise the city on the development of this plan, and a separate committee and consultant, WSB and Associates, established to advise the city on the development of the Navarre Area Plan. The Planning Commission and City Council received this input and support this plan. The Advisory Committee members were: Planning Advisory Committee Navarre Area Plan (NAP) (PAC) Bob Erickson Eric Zweber, WSB and Associates Candice Nadler Carlo Missio, WSB and Associates Chad Olson Ralph Kempf Dennis Libby Charles Nadler Dennis Walsh Kirk Sherman Jan Berg Michael Reymann Jennifer Smiley Tanya Srepel John Morast Devon Steinmeyer Jon Schwingler Ross Elenkiwich Meg Cowden Harry Yaffe Phil Lusardi John O’Sullivan Rick Meyers Shawn McIntee Mary Tucker Bill Wolfson The Advisory Committees held a number of open houses to and community interactions to generate interest and facilitate comments. The PAC held a public Open House on September 13, 2017 to introduce the work to the public, and an open house on May 10, 208 to introduce the public review period. A final open house was held on October 25th to allow the public to review the final plan and to collect more comments prior to final adjustments for Planning Commission and City Council review. Open House forums were chosen to facilitate comments from constituents that may be uncomfortable speaking in larger, more formal forums. In the Summer/ Fall of 2017, an online survey was distributed to help inform the planning process for the comprehensive plan. This survey is attached as Exhibit 5-C. CMP Part 5. Implementation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 3 PLAN ADOPTION Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.355, Subd. 2, the Orono Planning Commission explained the intent and the details of the CMP, and received public comments thereon, at an official Public Hearing held for that purpose on November 19, 2018. Notice of the Hearing was published in the official City newspaper on November 3, 2018. Following closing of the Public Hearing, and after discussion concerning changes and comments resulting from the Hearing, the Planning Commission on a vote of 6-0 recommended that the City Council adopt the Plan. On December 10, 2018 the Orono City Council on a vote of 4-0 approved the concept and direction of the Community Management Plan, and adopted Resolution 6933 granting approval of the plan and ordering its submittal to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. This Community Management Plan was delivered to the Metropolitan Council on December 27, 2018 for their official review and approval. Metropolitan Council granted formal approval of the Plan on ____________. The Orono City Council formally adopted the Plan via Resolution No. ____________ on _______________on a vote of __ ayes and __ nay. PLAN DISTRIBUTION This CMP and any future amendments made thereto shall be distributed to the following agencies and jurisdictions as required by law: CITY OF ORONO City Clerk - 2 copies for permanent record METROPOLITAN COUNCIL STATE OF MINNESOTA Department of Transportation Department of Natural Resources HENNEPIN COUNTY Administration Department of Transportation ADJACENT MUNICIPALITIES Chanhassen Deephaven Eden Prairie Greenwood Independence Long Lake Medina Minnetonka Minnetrista Mound Plymouth Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Wayzata SCHOOL DISTRICTS 276 Minnetonka 277 Westonka 278 Orono 284 Wayzata CMP Part 5. Implementation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 4 INDEPENDENT DISTRICTS Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Three Rivers Park District PERIODIC REVIEW The Community Management Plan is intended to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council, and updated if necessary. PLAN AMENDMENT After formal adoption of this CMP by the City Council, there shall be no amendments made to the plan content except by the following applicable state law. IMPLEMENTATION The City utilizes various tools to implement the Comprehensive Plan. The primary tools include, but are not limited to: 1) Zoning Regulations and Zoning Map – Chapter 78 of the City Code 2) Subdivision Regulations – Chapter 82 of the City Code 3) Individual Sewage Treatment System Regulations – Chapter 58 of the City Code 4) Sewer and Water System Regulations – Chapters 14 and 82 of the of the City Code 5) Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) (Appendix 5-A) 6) City Budget 7) City Fee Schedule (esp. sewer, water, and park dedication fees to support infrastructure). Zoning Regulations and Zoning Map The current zoning map is attached as Map 5-1. The City intends to review these official controls for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan within nine months of adopting the Plan as required by State law. The City will also make any changes which are necessary to make the official controls consistent with the Plan within this timeframe. The City has identified that the following changes may be necessary to make the official controls consistent with the Plan: 1) Review standards for development within the Mixed Residential Land Use. 2) Amend official controls to achieve consistency with updated density requirements for Medium-High Density Residential and High Density Residential land uses. 3) Amend official zoning map for property for which a Future Land Use was amended. 4) Review environmental protection regulations. Administrative Provisions The Ordinances pertaining to general government operation are updated on an ongoing basis to reflect current policy and requirements. General performance standard revisions may be needed to be consistent with the CMP, with current development concerns and with recognized existing situations. The City wishes to carefully protect CMP plans and neighborhood property values, but does not want to require unnecessary zoning reviews, extensive delays, or unrealistic standards. Areas needing attention include: Commercial district development standards and uses, CMP Part 5. Implementation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 5 Lake access management, Standards for private roads, and Nonconforming use provisions. ISTS Management The City’s progressive policies regarding management of individual sewage treatment systems will be continued and strengthened as the best insurance policy against unnecessary extension of municipal sewers into the Rural Area. The City will continue to provide for a full-time City employee whose duties are public education and the enforcement of proper on-site sewage treatment system operation. Current ordinances provide for regular system maintenance and for periodical inspection of all existing systems by the City inspector. Environmental Ordinances The Shoreland Management ordinances adopted in 1992 require only minimal if any revisions at this time. An updated Floodplain Ordinance was adopted in 2016 to be in conformity with FEMA and other regulations, and a new Wetlands Ordinance was adopted in 2005 in compliance with MCWD requirements as well as those of the Surface Water Management Plan. Certain additional amendments of these Ordinances may be required upon forthcoming adoption of the updated SWMP. Lake Use Ordinances The regulations involving lake use, harbor limits and management of access to Lake Minnetonka as a recreational resource will be reviewed to determine whether they should more adequately incorporate Lake Minnetonka Conservation District rules where appropriate, and to provide City regulation where necessary. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Overview In order to achieve Orono’s development goals and objectives in accordance with the CMP, expenditures of public funds will be required. Such expenditures may include acquisition of park and open space lands, road construction or reconstruction, maintenance equipment purchases, municipal building improvements, utility extension or reconstruction, stormwater management facilities construction, and the like. The city annually reviews the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to identify and prioritize capital expenditures over a sufficient period to allow for adequate financial and budgetary planning. The CIP allows the City Council to make sound financial decisions for accomplishing the various capital improvements required to implement the CMP. The CIP is attached as Appendix 5-A to this chapter. Potential funding sources for capital improvement expenditures may include: - General Fund - Special Assessment CMP Part 5. Implementation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 6 - General Obligation Bonds - Revenue Bonds - Tax Increment Financing - Development Impact Fees - Grants from public agencies - Donations SUMMARY OF PROJECTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Commercial/Industrial Development Infrastructure The public improvements required to support Orono=s planned development are essentially in place. Minor expansions of infrastructure are expected to be paid for by the developer. Sewer/Water Systems Renovation Ongoing maintenance of the City=s sewer and water systems occasionally requires capital expenditures for major rehabilitation work. These system renovation projects will be primarily funded by revenues from operation of these utilities, with additional necessary funding from special assessment to the system users. Parks and Open Space The CIP includes a Parks, Open Space and Trails element. The primary capital expenditures will involve the improvement and maintenance of existing park lands. Funding sources will include fees collected through the subdivision process (Park Fund), the General Fund, and grants or donations from public agencies and private entities. A large proportion of Orono’s existing preserved open space has been through private and public contribution. Stormwater Management Implementation of Orono’s Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) will require significant public expenditures, including site acquisition and construction of stormwater retention ponds, storm sewer construction, and related projects. Funding sources will include the City’s Stormwater and Drainage Utility Fees (charged to all properties on an annual basis); the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fees (charged to all new developments); the General Fund; and grants from other public agencies. Road Maintenance and Reconstruction Reconstruction of City roads has in the past been funded through the General Fund rather than by special assessments. This practice is expected to continue. Minnesota State Aid (MSA) funding for reconstruction of qualified road segments will be a principal source of funding for ongoing road reconstruction. CMP Part 5. Implementation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Orono has a number of long-standing interrelationships with surrounding jurisdictions and public agencies. These relationships have arisen as a result of many and varied factors, including: geographic proximity; efficiency and economies of scale; mutual goals and philosophies; and a desire to provide for a more uniform and coordinated planning and delivery of services. Orono will continue to encourage cooperative local efforts for the sharing of services, equipment and facilities. Cooperation with regional and state governmental units will be encouraged, especially where mutual goals can be identified and implemented. Forest LakeBridge DeeringIsland HendricksonBridge CoffeeBridge NoerenbergBridge ArcolaBridge The NarrowsBridge TanagerBridge Boy ScoutBridge SHORELINE DR CO RD 15 HOMESTEADTRFERNDALERDW WAYZATA BLVD W SPRUCE WAY PhillipsDrBLAINE AVEBROWN RD NTONKAVIEWLA Dee rRu nTrEH e rric k C irFERNDALE RD NHollander Rd North StreamRdAVE ORONO ORCHARD RD N MINNETONKA AVE LU C E L I N E T R E NORTHSHOREDRSPATES AVE LUCE LINE TR OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD NWOODHILLAVE BALDUR PARK RD LYDIARDCIR PROSPECT AVESTUBBS BAY RD SManorCi r PINERIDGE LA BROWN RD SS IX T H A V E N HANLON AVECopper CORRAL RD LAFAYETTERIDGE CT FOREST LAKE LANDING WILDHURST TR N O RTH A R M D R BRACKETTSPOINTRDCoun try s i de Dr W akefieldRdWILLOWBROOKRDLINDEN AVEPARK AVENAVARRE AVEBROWN RD SOLDLONGLAKERD BARRETT AVEDICKENSON ST CRYSTAL AVECoxFarmRdF O R ESTLAKE D R KEENE AVERUSSELLAVEBIRCH LACHERRY PLORCHARDBEACH PLNORTHARM LALuceLineRid ge WyndmereRdRd FOX ST EILEEN ST LivingstonCt LaWearLaMAPLELA PARTENWOODLA B O H N S P O I N T L A EASTLAKEST WEARLANETHEL AVEWEAR CIR WA Y Z A T A B L V D WShore Hills Walters Port LaELM LASilverViewDr KnollMannorRdD A KOTA LONG LAKE BLVDWEBBSTHIGHWOOD LARAILROADAVECARMANRDWATERTOWNRD CAROLINE AVEARBOR STM A PLE R ID G E LA P e n c e L aCristoforiCir BAYSIDE RD Landmark DrELM ST SilverMeadowDrNorthFarmRd Brown Rd NWillowViewDr F o xStNORTH SHORE DR WCO RD 1 3 5 VINE PLCARMANSTTURNHAM RDSalemCt WESTLAKE STCRYSTAL PL LYRIC AVE LIVINGSTON AVEMINNIE AVEWEST BRANCH RD WAYZATA BLVD W FERNDALEGREENR E S TP O IN T L A View Dr S ugarwood D r CO RD 146O LIVEAVE LittleOrchardWay Hunter Pass Ridgewood CirTOWN LINE RDRainey Rd DAHL RD ORONO LA SPRINGHILLRD Christine Dr LINDENLA SPR UCEPL C re ek Rid g ePass DICKE Y LAKEDR Shadow oodDr A. Bridgewater DrB. Boulder DrC. Sandstone LaD. Stonebay DrE. Cascade LaF. Sandstone CtG. Cobblestone Ct A.B.TONKA AVERuann RdUSHWYNO12 KintyreLaCOUNTRYCLUB RD Longv ie w C i r SIXT H A V E N Truffula TrHER I T AG E D RCRESTVIEW AVEHIGH LA C olin Dr Woodhaven Dr FO X RIDGERD C.D.E.F. G LEN D ALEC O VELACHIPPEWA LA F r e n c h L a ke Rd Jacobs Mill R d Tangle woodDee r R u n Tr Som e r s etLa LY M A N AV E West Farm Rd Devin La B A YVIEWPL W olverton Pl N O R T H E R N AV E Thoroughbred LaCrystalCreekRd TAMARACK DRFOX ST NORTH ARM DR W TOGO RDWILDHURSTTR G. W hite O akCirAb in g don W a yJamestownRd Coun t r ysideDr W C R Y STALBAYRDWAYZATABLVDW CYGNET PL USHWYNO12 KELLY AVE ORONOORCHARDRDSLEAF STW IL L O W D R S OAK ST L U C E L IN E T R KELLEY PKWY KokeshFarmRdWILLOW DR SOLD BEACH RDMCCULLEYRDCASCO AVE WILLOW DR NPARKLAPARKD R LAKEVIEWTER OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD SLOMA LINDA AVEBOHNSPOINTRDS MITH AVE HERITAGELA LYDIARD AVESTUBBS BAY RD NFREDERICKST MINNETO NKA O ro n o O a k s D rBEDERWOODDrSusse x LaTONKAWA RDTO NK A W A R D RESTPOINT CIRW E B BERHILL S RDHACKBERRY HILLCASCOCIR IVY PL Sussex Rd Cr e ekw o od T r Golden View DrHIG HLAND S LA PARTENWOODRD FrenchCreek Cir WoodhillAveWoodhillRdGrahamHillRd OxfordRdS H E VLINDRCO RD NO 19PHEASANTR DMYRTLEW OOD RD Hunt Far m RdFORESTA R M S L AEA S T L O N GLAKERDDeborahDr FAR V IE W LAORCHARD PARK RDCHEVYC HASED R MapleA veCasco CoveCASCO PT RDC ASCO POINT RDKE NWOODWAY W E S T L A F A Y E T T E R D Hills Rd KELLYAVEFAG E R N E S SPOINTRDCONCORDIA STMAPLE PLCHERRYAVE HIGH W O O D R D FAIRVIEWCOTTAGE LAELMWOODAVEGRANDVIEWAVENORTH ARM DRWINDJAMMERLANORTH SHORE DR RESTPOINTRDGARDENCT FrenchCreekD r BRIAR STLAKEVIEW AVE SHORELINEDRTonkaview Ct CORD15S H O R E L IN E DRMillston RdGreenTrees RdCarriageGander RdCORD84EdgewoodWoodhillRd B N IN C . NorthgateRd NAVARRELASussexCi rGARDEN CTWATERTOWNRDCO RD 6 C O R D 6 CO RD 112 CO RD 6 CO RD 6 CO RD 112 CO RD 112 C O R D 84CO RD 84 CO RD 151 CO RD 19 CO RD 151SHADYWOODRDCORD19/51 CO RD 19 C O RD51 CO RD 51 CO RD 15CO RD 19LIVINGSTONAVEDAKOTARAILTRAIL DAKOTA RAIL TRAILBay Ridge RdSTARKEY RDWillowHill DrBaysideTrlPineViewTrlDR NWILLOWO liverHillD U N W O O D Y A V ELak e viewPkwyPinehurstCtStAndre w s S t AugustaStLak evie w Ct Lill i an L n SHADYWOOD RD K. I. H. Wood Duck TrlI. Bluestem WayJ. Sandhill DrK. Goldenrod Way H.MooneyLakeDrPrairie View LnShadywoodCirJ.HUNTER DRLR-1A RR-1B PRDRR-1B RR-1B RR-1B RR-1BRR-1B RS RS LR-1A LR-1A LR-1A PRD I LR-1B LR-1C LR-1C LR-1B B-2 LR-1C-1 LR-1B LR-1B RR-1B PRD PRD RR-1A R-1B RPUD LR-1A LR-1A RPUD PRD PRD PRD RR-1B B-2 R-1A R-1A PRD RR-1B StubbsBay MaxwellBayNorthArm CrystalBay SmithBay BrownsBay WestArm CarmanBay Spring ParkBay BIGISLAND LafayetteBay MooneyLake DickeysLake SPRINGPARK TONKABAY MINNETONKABEACH WAYZATA LONGLAKE )n GeWX GÞWX GoWX G½WX GsWX Lake Minnetonka ForestLake FrenchMarsh TanagerLake KatrinaLake LydiardLakeLongLake LakeClassen BrackettsPoint PointCharming CrownPoint RecreationPoint MahpiyataIsland CascoPoint BohnsPoint 29 2830 27 26 25 31 32 33 34 35 36 6 5 4 3 2 7 8 9 10 11 14 18 17 16 15 19 20 23 21 22 29 Map Document: \\Arcserver1\GIS\ORNO\_Basemap\ESRI\Maps\2018\Orono_ZoningMap_11x17.mxdDate Saved: 11/7/2018 2:02:54 PMZoning Ma p 2018 City of Orono November 2018 SHORELINE DR BLAINE AVELAFAYETTE RIDGE CT NAVARRE AVELivingstonCt CARMANSTSHADY W O OD RD CRYSTAL PL LYRIC AVE LIVINGSTON AVE O L IVEAVE N O R T H E R N AV E KELLY AVE OLD BEACH RDFREDERICKST D U N W O O D Y A V E CASCO POINT RDN A VA R R EL A BAYVIEW PL Shadywood CirB-4B-3B-1 B-5 B-1 B-1 B-1 B-1 B-1B-5B-5 B-4 LR-1C-1 LR-1C-1LR-1C LR-1C LR-1C LR-1B PRD PRD PRD LR-1C-1 LR-1B WAYZATA BLVD W BROWN RD NOLD CRYSTAL BAY RD NPINERID GE LA WAYZATA BLVD W Su garwood Dr DICKEYLAKEDR A.B. C.D.E.F. G. Kelley Pkwy RPUD B-6 PUDB-6 PUD RR-1B PUD I PRD B-1 RPUDB-6PUD RR-1BRR-1B INSET 2 INSET 1 A. BRIDGEWATER DRB. BOULDER DRC. SANDSTONE LAD. STONEBAY DRE. CASCADE LAF. SANDSTONE CTG. COBBLESTONE CT 0 3,000 Feet I INSET 1 INSET 2 ZONING DISTRICTS Business B-1 - Retail Sales B-2 - Lakeshore B-3 - Shopping Center B-4 - Office/Professional B-5 - Limited Neighborhood B-6 PUD - Highway Commercial Industrial I - Industrial Recreational RS - Seasonal Recreational Rural Residential RR-1A - One Family Rural Residential - 5 Acres RR-1B - One Family Rural Residential - 2 Acres Lakeshore Residential LR-1A - One Family Lakeshore Residential - 2 Acres LR-1B - One Family Lakeshore Residential - 1 Acre LR-1C - One Family Lakeshore Residential - 1/2 Acre LR-1C-1 - One Family Lakeshore Residential Subdistrict - 1/2 Acre Residential R-1A - One Familyl Residential - 1 Acre R-1B - One Family Residential - 1/2 Acre Planned Unit Development RPUD - Residential Planned Unit Development RR-1B PUD PRD - Planned Residential Development PUD/RR-1B Other City Limits Section Boundary Lakes Parcels Source:Zoning data created and maintained by the City of Orono Planning and Zoning Department. Parcel dataobtained from Hennepin County Taxpayer Division. The Zoning Designation on this map are a representation on a combination of maps,ordinances and City Code requirements which make up the complete City of OronoZoning Regulations. Information on Planned Development is available at the City Hall. AllZoning requirements and Zoning designations on specific properties are subject to change. For updated Zoning information, please contact the City of Orono Planning and ZoningDepartment at planning@ci.orono.mn.us or call (952) 249-4620. This map reflects all valid Zoning amendments up to and including Ordinance no. 60,third Series adopted May 11, 2009 2008 2017 (194 responses) 2 years or less 4%10% 2-5 years 11%19% 6-10 years 21%18% 11-20 years 29%24% 21-30 15%11% Over 30 years 15%15% Under $300,000 6%8% $300,001 - $600,000 28%22% $600,001 – 1 million 34%43% Over $1 million 22%24% Don’t know 8%3% Excellent 62%59% Good 37%36% Fair 1%4% Poor 0%52% Unsure 21%16%Road Nothing 15%11%Navarre Protect the Environment 6%10%Improve Lower Taxes 10%9%Development Street Repair 10%8%Trails Water and Sewer Service 5%6%Traffic More Trails and sidewalks 4%5%Parks Stop Growth 7%5%Space Grocery store 8%5%Lots Finish Highway 12 2%5%Long Lake Enforce Building codes 2%4%Residents Improve Traffic Safety 2%4%Restaurants Improve city services 4%4%Construction More retail 2%4%Housing scattered 3%4%Retail 1. Approximately, how many years have you lived in Orono 2. Which of the following categories contains the approximate value of your residential property 3. How would you rate the quality of life in Orono? 4. If you could advise the City, what actions would you recommend to significantly improve the quality of life in the city? Open Space 22%22%Lake Small Town Feel 6%10%Space The Lake 39%7%Community Large Lots 5%6%Quiet Schools 9%6%Schools Parks and Trails 2%6%Peaceful Quiet and Peaceful 3%5%Life Wealth 6%5%Nature Scattered 4%4%Rural 4%Safe unsure 8% nothing 8% too much growth 9%15% quality of schools 9%12% High Taxes 29%4% lack of affordable housing 5%11% Poor street repair 7%4% lack of water and sewer service 4% traffic congestion 6%8% uneven code enforcement 4%4% Highway 12 construction 5% Lack of grocery store 3% scattered 3%42% Unsure 15% Nothing 6% Sense of Community 4%4% Street Repair 28%13% Trails 5%4% Cable service 2% Public Transit 2% Water Quality 3% School Funding 4%10% Lower Taxes 7% No Mega Homes 2% Water and Sewer Services 4% Highway 12 Construction 5% City Services 3% Retail 4% 6. What do you think is the most serious issue facing the city of Orono? 5. What image comes to mind when you think about the city of Orono (1-4 words) 7. What aspects, if any, of the community should be fixed or improved in the future? Navarre 2%8% Scattered 4%42% Development 8% Traffic 7% Long Lake 4% Yes 98%94% No 2%5% a. Police Protection Excellent 37%55% Good 56%39% Fair 4%3% Poor 1%58% b. Fire Protection Excellent 32%54% Good 55%36% Fair 4%4% Poor 2%2% c. Sanitary sewer service Excellent 13%35% Good 50%34% Fair 11%5% Poor 4%5% Refused 22%21% d. Municipal Water service Excellent 10%24% Good 34%21% Fair 8%9% Poor 5%4% Refused 44%42% e. City Street maintenance Excellent 6%15% Good 39%43% Fair 44%24% Poor 10%14% f. City Customer service Excellent 20% Good 42% Fair 19% Poor 8% 8. Do you feel safe in your neighborhood? If no, why 9. For each of the following city services, how Excellent 9%14% Good 76%48% Fair 21%30% Poor 2%8% 20.00$ 32%6% 40.00$ 19%4% 60.00$ 14%4% 80.00$ 5%4% 100.00$ 8%18% More than $100 17%20% 0 34% Yes 61% No 39% Top priority 10%13% High Priority 24%19% Medium Priority 46%26% Low Priority 13%30% No priority 5%12% Very Important 46%53% Somewhat important 47%33% Not too important 4%8% Not at all important 3%7% Work in Orono 17%18% Commute Outside 49%44% Not working 9%14% Retired 25%13% *Minneapolis, Wayzata, and Plymouth most common 10. When you consider the property taxes you pay and the quality of city services you receive, how would you rate the general value? 11. Thinking back to question #7, when you identified aspects of the community that should be fixed or improved, how much would you be willing to pay in additional property taxes per year to enhance city services or offer additional city services? 12. When retiring, do you plan on making Orono your primary residence? 13. How great a priority would you give the reinvestment, redevelopment, and beautification of Navarre? 14. How important is it to you for the city of Orono to be a leader in environmental protection (Lakes, wetlands, streams)? 15. Do you work in Orono, commute outside the city, or do not work/ retired? Excellent 6%27% Good 63%32% Fair 26%15% Poor 5%5% No answer 0%22% Excellent 9%22% Good 71%51% Fair 14%19% Poor 5%8% No answer 2%1% Strongly Favor 3%13% Favor 49%31% Oppose 21%24% Strongly oppose 17%21% Would you use an expanded…. Strongly Favor 12%17%Yes Favor 65%78%No Oppose 8% Strongly oppose 8% Assessor/ Taxes 11%5% Permits 27%36% Code information 10%8% Recycling 6%4% Sewer 12%2% Flooding 2%1% Tree removal 3%1% Street parking 3%4% Subdivision of land 5%4% Crime reporting 3%4% Parks and recreation 3%2% 18. Would you favor or oppose the City of Orono developing expanded automobile traffic corridors for commuter traffic moving within and through the community. 16. How would you rate the ease of getting to and from work? 17. How would you rate the ease of getting from place to place within the city of Orono? 19. Would you favor or oppose the city of Orono pursuing the construction of an expanded park-and- ride lot in the Navarre area or in Northern Orono and establish more frequent bus service between the lot and downtown Minneapolis? 20. What is the nature of your most recent contact, in other words, what information or service did you seek? Animal Control 3%2% License 2%4% Voting 3%11% Other (TEXT BOX)13% Newspaper 19% Social Media 26% Website 25% List Serve/ email subscription 9% Neighbors 16% Other (TEXT BOX)5% Satisfied 83%66% Dissatisfied 7%12% Mixed 8%22% Very informed 15%18% Somewhat informed 57%51% Not too informed 21%27% Not at all informed 6%4% Excellent 7%6% Good 58%41% Fair 30%44% Poor 3%8% No answer 3%2% Phone Newspaper 6% Email 45% Website 8% Postcard/ Direct Mail 15% Social Media 15% Newsletter 10% 25. What is the best way for the City to communicate issues to you? 21. How do you get your information on the city? 22. In general, where you satisfied or dissatisfied with the service you received? 23. How would you rate your current level of information about Orono City Government and its activities? 24. Overall, how would you rate the job the City does communicating with residents? Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Summary of Costs CIP 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Parks (A-1)$380,900 $374,635 $190,902 $270,000 $316,700 $4,775 $64,946 $0 $5,068 $0 $70,300 $5,378 $0 $0 $81,802 Equipment (A-2a)$186,300 $516,900 $342,800 $450,000 $253,100 $77,500 $600,000 $535,800 $37,000 $90,461 $60,000 $482,800 $577,932 $278,000 $340,376 Building (A-2b)$215,000 $54,050 $139,560 $700,760 $75,000 $320,000 $0 $209,000 $22,523 $0 $38,643 $160,000 $164,000 $168,100 $172,303 IT (A-2c)$130,274 $19,917 $17,665 $82,717 $14,923 $9,434 $15,800 $19,371 $21,048 $6,229 $17,766 $42,734 $17,700 $5,871 $39,548 Long Lake Fire (A-3)$310,250 $18,275 $42,500 $19,550 $42,500 $423,300 $72,250 $0 $106,250 $425,000 $21,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 Community Investment (A-4)$0 $0 $568,970 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Works - Streets - PMP(A-5) $1,131,295 $737,484 $607,152 $731,498 $383,943 $1,145,336 $959,969 $1,091,763 $1,090,436 $1,105,002 $807,703 $822,857 $838,314 $854,080 $870,162 Public Works - Water (A-6)$474,855 $800,180 $821,415 $345,845 $379,052 $277,154 $302,833 $898,628 $444,544 $520,581 $306,742 $313,031 $384,449 $325,999 $482,685 Public Works - Sanitary Sewer (A-7)$804,068 $1,096,720 $875,169 $853,924 $792,644 $797,119 $705,210 $684,650 $704,506 $724,942 $745,972 $767,616 $789,891 $812,815 $836,407 Public Works - Storm Sewer (A-8)$708,375 $858,844 $564,777 $506,353 $577,294 $591,726 $606,519 $621,682 $637,224 $653,155 $669,484 $686,221 $703,376 $720,961 $738,985 Police (A-9)$189,314 $131,891 $175,883 $152,389 $247,911 $180,448 $157,002 $185,572 $147,659 $205,764 $198,386 $114,028 $200,689 $160,370 $229,071 Totals $4,530,630 $4,608,895 $4,346,793 $4,113,036 $3,083,067 $3,826,793 $3,484,529 $4,246,467 $3,216,258 $3,731,132 $2,936,246 $3,394,665 $3,676,351 $3,326,196 $3,791,337 Debt Issue 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2008 Street Reconstruction Bonds 2010 Street Reconstruction Bonds $132,725 $134,825 $131,520 $133,325 $134,530 $130,000 $130,725 2014 Garage, Water, Refunding Bonds $165,300 $162,900 $166,700 $161,000 $282,000 $277,000 $277,000 $278,860 $278,000 $278,000 2016 GO Rfunding $412,975 $413,275 $412,780 $416,675 Current Debt Levy $711,000 $711,000 $711,000 $711,000 $416,530 $407,000 $407,725 $278,860 $278,000 $278,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Debt Service Levy 5-Year CIP Planning Period Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Parks CIP Table A-1 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Park Equipment (Navarre, Hackberry, Bederwood, Crystal Bay, Fagerness)60,000$ 64,946$ 70,300$ 76,095$ Dock Replacement (15 year life)4,500$ 4,775$ 5,068$ 5,378$ 5,707$ CSAH 112 PH 3 Trail (School to CSAH 6)137,000$ Trail Construction along CSAH 19 to Dakota 115,000$ Bederwood Park Improvements 170,000$ CR 6 Trail (OCB - Willow) Improvement 36,402$ East Long Lake Road to Trail 120,000$ Basket Ball Court Surfacing - Navarre Basket Ball Court Surfacing - Crystal Bay 10,000$ Basket Ball Court Surfacing - Hackberry 10,000$ Big Island ADA Trails 54,500$ Big Island Restroom 37,500$ Big Island Ammenities 53,250$ Lurton Trails Hackberry Improvments 100,000$ GC Clubhouse Foundation Restoration GC Wetland and Fairway #4 Improvements 160,000$ GC Porch/ Patio GC Cart parking GC Fairway #1 Drainainge GC Fairway 7&8 Drainiange 21,400$ GC Fest Tent Area GC Fire Pit 26,885$ GC Tow Rope 102,000$ GC Perimter Trail 214,700$ GC Lawn Bowling 80,000$ GC Cart Trail 20,000$ Totals $380,900 $374,635 $190,902 $270,000 $316,700 $4,775 $64,946 $0 $5,068 $0 $70,300 $5,378 $0 $0 $81,802 5-Year CIP Planning Period Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Equipment CIP Table A-2a Purchase Expected Equipment Needs Year Life (yrs)2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Truck, Small Pick Up #210 2018 15 40,376$ Tractor -Mower/ Sweeper #351 2016 15 57,932$ Ice Resurfacer 11,000$ Skid loader #452 2003 20 53,500$ Fairway Mower #600 2018 20 Tee Mower #603 2004 20 38,000$ Small Utility Tractor/ Vehicle w/ Sprayer #604 2002 20 49,000$ Greens Mower #605 2004 20 8,800$ Greens Mower (riding) #606 1999 20 48,000$ Debris Blower #607 ?10 7,300$ Sprayer #608 (included with new 604)2001 10 Fertilizer Spreader #608 20 6,000$ Truck, Pick up #610 2018 15 Aerator #611 1988 25 22,500$ Mower (Big island) #615 2018 10 8,961$ Greens / Turf Roller #618 30 13,000$ Top Dresser #619 30 16,800$ Pontoon Boat #620 20 Building Inspection Vehicle #211 2011 15 40,300$ Jet Rodder #711 1976 40 300,000$ Utility Service Truck with hoist #712 2012 10 63,000$ Vactor Truck #713 2000 20 450,000$ Generator, Portable 50KW #850 2013 30 40,000$ Generator, 30KW w/ light tower #851 1984 20 20,000$ Generator, Portable 50KW #856 1999 30 40,000$ Televising equipment #715 100,000$ Tractor Loader Backhoe #430 2006 20 145,500$ Street Sweeper #460 2016 10 600,000$ Ford 3/4 Ton Pickup #709 2013 15 37,000$ Truck, 3/4 Ton Pickup w/Plow #422 2008 15 50,000$ Grader w/Plow Wing #423 1996 30 350,000$ Dump Truck w/ Plow and Sander #424 2015 15 260,000$ Dump Truck w/ Plow and Sander & Hook #425 2018 15 300,000$ Dump Truck w/ wing plow and Sander #426 2016 15 260,000$ Dump Truck w/ Plow and Sander #427 2017 15 260,000$ Truck, 1 Ton Dump Truck w/Plow and Sander #428 2015 15 102,800$ Loader #429 2011 20 260,000$ Truck, 1 Ton Dump Truck w/Plow and Sander #431 2008 15 102,800$ Hot Patch Truck #432 1999 20 188,000$ Tractor (ROW Mower) #450 2005 15 49,400$ Skid loader #451 2013 20 70,000$ Roller #470 1990 40 40,000$ Chipper #471 2004 20 40,500$ Trailer #481 2012 20 9,000$ Trailer #482 2012 20 9,000$ Truck, 3/4 Ton Pickup w/Plow (Sign Truck) #708 2005 15 70,000$ Bucket Truck 60,000$ Boom / lift #708P 50,000$ Brine Maker #2018 20 Flail Mower #450A 2013 10 32,000$ Snow blower #451A 2013 15 11,500$ Sweeper #451B 2015 10 Chevy 3/4 Ton Pickup w/Plow #710 2012 15 37,000$ Totals 186,300$ 516,900$ 342,800$ 450,000$ 253,100$ 77,500$ 600,000$ 535,800$ 37,000$ 90,461$ 60,000$ 482,800$ 577,932$ 278,000$ 340,376$ 5 Year CIP Planning Period Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Building CIP Table A-2b Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Public Works Roof Replacement 665760 City Hall Roof Replacement $320,000 Police Department Roof Replacement $209,000 Post Office Entry Roof Replacement $20,000 Public Works Parking Lot Repave 119560 City Hall Carpet $20,000 $22,523 Emergency Generator 175000 City Hall Parking Lot chip Seal (7years)$35,000 $38,643 Public Works Security Fencing Brush Site Fencing Park and Ride (striping)$12,000 Park and Ride Chip Seal $12,050 PW Cold Storage $30,000 PW Storage Racking 20000 PW Air Handling System Refurbish $75,000 Future Facilities Improvements $160,000 $164,000 $168,100 $172,303 Totals $215,000 $54,050 $139,560 $700,760 $75,000 $320,000 $0 $209,000 $22,523 $0 $38,643 $160,000 $164,000 $168,100 $172,303 5-Year CIP Planning Period Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Table A-2c Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 File Server (4 Years)$12,500 $13,500 $15,000 $16,000 PC Replacement $4,774 $4,917 $5,065 $5,217 $5,373 $5,534 $5,700 $5,871 $6,048 $6,229 $6,416 $5,534 $5,700 $5,871 $6,048 Printer (3 Years)$3,600 $3,900 $4,300 $4,700 $5,000 Switch (Every 6 Years - 4 Switches)$8,500 $9,000 $9,550 $10,100 $10,700 $11,350 $12,000 $12,500 Phone Replacement (10 Years)$65,000 Wireless Access Points - City Hall & PW $15,000 $17,500 Web Site Upgrade Cloud Based Servers $65,000 Fund Accounting Software Upgrade $52,000 Totals $130,274 $19,917 $17,665 $82,717 $14,923 $9,434 $15,800 $19,371 $21,048 $6,229 $17,766 $42,734 $17,700 $5,871 $39,548 IT CIP Planning Period5-Year CIP Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Table A-3 Purchase Expected Project Year Life (yrs)2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Refurbishment of EOC & Comm Rm 2002 10 Portable Radio Replacement 2004 10 $21,500 $23,000 $23,000 $25,000 $25,000 Replace E12 with New Rescue Pumper 1990 20 Replace U13 with a New Utility Truck 2001 15 Replace E11 with New Rescue Pumper 2004 20 $475,000 Replace U11 with New Utility Truck 1999 15 $85,000 Replace U21 with New Utility Truck 2000 15 $85,000 Replace CMD2 2012 10 $50,000 Replace CMD1 2013 10 $50,000 Replace E21 with New Rescue Pumper 2003 20 $500,000 Refurbishment of B11 2004 20 $100,000 Carpet Replacement and Paint at Station 1 2002 10 Carpet Replacement and Paint at Station 2 2004 15 $30,000 Replace SCBA 2006 15 $250,000 $300,000 Re-roof Station 1 2002 25 Re-roof Station 2 2004 25 Totals:$365,000 $21,500 $50,000 $23,000 $50,000 $498,000 $85,000 $0 $125,000 $500,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 City of Orono's Portion (85%)$310,250 $18,275 $42,500 $19,550 $42,500 $423,300 $72,250 $0 $106,250 $425,000 $21,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 Totals $310,250 $18,275 $42,500 $19,550 $42,500 $423,300 $72,250 $0 $106,250 $425,000 $21,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 Long Lake Fire CIP 5-Year CIP Planning Period Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Community Investment CIP Table A-4 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 County Road 112 Turn Back (Lighting/Sidewalks) *$568,970 Totals $0 $0 $568,970 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5-Year CIP Planning Period * The scope of the County Road 112 Turn Back Project is yet to be determined. Therefore, the cost estimate for the project is subject to change and refinement as the project development process proceeds. The City's final share of the project will be established by the County's cost sharing policy and the final scope of the project as developed by the City of Orono and Hennepin County. Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Streets CIP Table A-5 Project Type 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Forest Arm Lane Rehabilitation 364,956$ Wildhurst Trail (network)Rehabilitation Vine Place Mill and Overlay West Lafayette (Shadywood to end)Rehabilitation Lyric Avenue (Livingston to Blaine)Rehabilitation Minnetonka Highlands Lane Mill and Overlay Linden Lane Realign East Long Lake Road Rehabilitation 153,890$ Windjamer (North Arm to End)Rehabilitation 71,834$ Fox Street (Brown-Orono Orchard)Rehabilitation 418,271$ Smith and Lyman Avenues Mill and Overlay $ 112,146 Tonkaview Lane Mill and Overlay 160,694$ Townline Road (Shared with Independence)Mill and Overlay $ 140,426 Chevy Chase Drive Mill and Overlay 276,755$ Kelley Parkway - OCB Rd to StoneBay Mill and Overlay $ 72,666 Casco Circle Mill and Overlay $ 120,435 Dickenson Street Mill and Overlay $ 57,048 Glendale Drive Mill and Overlay $ 33,644 East Navarre Roads (Kenwood, Olive, Lafayette Ridge Ct.)Mill and Overlay $ 203,814 Orchard Park Road Mill and Overlay $ 142,132 Rest Point Lane Mill and Overlay $ 28,524 North Arm Drive Mill and Overlay 299,747$ Park Lane Reconstrcut $ 29,255 Togo Road Mill and Overlay $ 73,138 Briar Street Mill and Overlay $ 43,517 Livingston & Navarre Aves Mill and Overlay 231,751$ Willow Drive - Fox St- Brown Road Mill and Overlay $ 242,987 Forest Lake Drive Mill and Overlay $ 58,511 Preventive Maintenance CS 50,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 153,000$ 156,060$ 159,181$ 162,365$ 165,612$ 168,924$ 172,303$ 175,749$ Contracted Street Maintenace Crack Seal / Patching 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ Long Range Planning -Mill and Overlay 250,000$ 255,000$ 260,100$ 265,302$ 270,608$ 276,020$ 281,541$ 287,171$ 292,915$ Long Range Reconstructs 300,000$ 306,000$ 312,120$ 318,362$ 324,730$ 331,224$ 337,849$ 344,606$ 351,498$ Total - Pavement Management Fund 1,056,295$ 737,484$ 607,152$ 731,498$ 383,943$ 919,769$ 750,000$ 764,000$ 778,280$ 792,846$ 807,703$ 822,857$ 838,314$ 854,080$ 870,162$ 5-Year CIP Planning Period Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Streets CIP Table A-5 Project Type 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 5-Year CIP Planning Period MSA Streets: Leaf Street Reclaim Ferndale Road North (Shared with Plymouth)Mill and Overlay 75,000$ Brown Road North Mill and Overlay 209,969$ Willow Drive - Watertown-Fox St Mill and Overlay 225,567$ Old Crystal Bay Road - Co Rd 112 to Cr Rd 6 Reconstruct Old Crystal Bay Road - Co Rd 112-Watertown Mill and Overlay 312,156$ Old Crystal Bay Road - Watertown to Fox St Mill and Overlay 312,156$ McCulley Road Mill and Overlay 327,763$ Total MSA Streets:75,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 225,567$ 209,969$ 327,763$ 312,156$ 312,156$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ MSA Debt Service 141,486$ 143,111$ 139,661$ 141,061$ 141,945$ 137,468$ 137,687$ 142,625$ Totals 1,131,295$ 737,484$ 607,152$ 731,498$ 383,943$ 1,145,336$ 959,969$ 1,091,763$ 1,090,436$ 1,105,002$ 807,703$ 822,857$ 838,314$ 854,080$ 870,162$ Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Water CIP Table A-6 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 North Wellhouse Scada Upgrade Navarre Plant Control Upgrade $55,200 North Water Tower Maintenance $62,500 $70,000 North Water Plant Painting $21,000 South Water Plant Painting $78,000 Navarre Plant Salt Brine Tank Rehab.$400,000 North Distribution Extension (West of OCB)$120,000 Well #3 Inspection & Maintenance (every 10 yrs) Well #4 Inspection & Maintenance (every 10 yrs)$20,000 Well #1 Rehabilitation (every 20 yrs)$150,000 Well #2 Rehabilitation (every 20 yrs)$150,000 Well #3 Rehabilitation (every 20 yrs)$150,000 Well #3 Screen $92,000 South Tower Repaint and Rehabilitation $350,000 $60,000 $65,000 Watermain replacement Old Crystal Bay Road W/Road West Lafeyette Main Replacement (w/Road) Water Main Replacement (CSAH15/19) W/Road $169,855 Watermain replacement CSAH 19 S of CSAH 15 $181,000 Watermain replacement Casco Circle W/Road $357,700 Watermain replacement E.Navarre Streets W/Road $327,880 Watermain replacement Togo Road W/Road $200,060 Watermain Loop Concordia $230,000 Water Valve Replacemetns (4 / Year)$24,000 $24,600 $25,215 $25,845 $26,492 $27,154 $27,833 $28,528 $29,242 $29,973 $30,722 $31,490 $32,277 $33,084 $33,911 Watermain Replacement $250,000 $255,000 $260,100 $265,302 $270,608 $276,020 $281,541 $287,171 $292,915 $298,773 Fixed Station Meter Reading System Water Meter Replacement (every 15yr)$90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 Totals $474,855 $800,180 $821,415 $345,845 $379,052 $277,154 $302,833 $898,628 $444,544 $520,581 $306,742 $313,031 $384,449 $325,999 $482,685 5-Year CIP Planning Period Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Sanitary Sewer CIP Table A-7 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Sewer Rehabilitation $281,377 $289,819 $298,513 $307,469 $316,693 $326,194 $335,979 $346,059 $356,441 $367,134 $378,148 $389,492 $401,177 $413,212 $425,609 Annual Sewer Televising (1/5 of City Each Year)$48,690 $50,151 $51,655 $53,205 $54,801 $56,445 $58,139 $59,883 $61,679 $63,530 $65,436 $67,399 $69,421 $71,503 $73,648 Lift Station #5 Generator Lift Station #9 Generator Lift Station #15 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #1 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #3 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #13 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #16 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #25 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #11 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #17 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #19 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #23 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #27 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #29 Generator $75,000 Grinder Station #2 Rehab Lift Station #9 Rehab Lift Staion #1 Rehab $20,000 Grinder Station #10 $40,000 Grinder Station #9 Rehab $40,000 Lift Station #13 Rehab $60,000 Lift Station #3 Rehab $60,000 Lift Station #11 Rehab $62,000 5-Year CIP Planning Period Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Sanitary Sewer CIP Table A-7 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 5-Year CIP Planning Period Lift Station #5 Rehab $62,000 Lift Station #4 Rehab $64,000 Lift Station #16 Rehab $64,000 Lift Station #25 Rehab $65,600 Lift Station #28 Rehab $65,600 Lift Station #2 Rehab $67,240 Lift Station #6 Rehab $67,240 Lift Station #30 Rehab $68,921 Grinder Station #8 Rehab $40,000 Lift Station #10 Rehab $68,921 Lift Station Rehab (2 per year)$142,127 $146,391 $150,783 $155,306 $159,965 $164,764 $169,707 $174,798 Northern Utilities Expansion (W/CSAH 113 PH3)$436,000 Lift Station Monitoring (Mission)$26,000 $26,000 $26,000 Forest Arms Main Rehab w/ rd $18,000 Windjammer Main Rehab with road $24,750 West Laffayette Main Rehab with Road construction Old Crystal Bay Road N Main Rehab ForceMain replacement with CSAH 19/15 Porject 180000 Forcemain Replacement Tonkawa PH2 $225,000 Forcemain Replacement Tonkawa PH3 $215,250 Forcemain Replacement Tonkawa PH4 139950 Sewer Main Replacements $130,000 $133,250 $136,581 $139,996 $143,496 $147,083 $150,760 $154,529 $158,392 $162,352 Totals $804,068 $1,096,720 $875,169 $853,924 $792,644 $797,119 $705,210 $684,650 $704,506 $724,942 $745,972 $767,616 $789,891 $812,815 $836,407 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Storm Sewer CIP Table A-8 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Storm Watershed Delineation and Pond Assessments 10,000$ 10,000$ Forest Arms Lane (w/road reconstruct)91,804$ Windjammer Stormwater (w/road reconstruct)10,775$ West Lafayette Stormwater (w/road reconstruct) Lyric Avenue (w/ Road reconstruct) Wildhurst Trail (w/ Road reconstruct) Minnetonka Highlands (w/Road reconstruct) Old Crystal Bay (6-112) (W/Rd Reconstruction) Vine place (w/ Road reconstruct) East Long Lake S (w/ Road reconstruct)34,210$ Windjammer (North Arm to End) (w/ Road reconstruct)71,834$ Smith and Lyman Avenue (w/ Road reconstruct)66,321$ Ferndale Rd N (w/M&O)50,000$ Tonkaview Lane (w/ Road reconstruct)87,531$ Chevy Chase Drive (w/ Road reconstruct) (HA-1)146,330$ Casco Circle (w/ M&O)122,065$ East Navarre Roads (w/ M&O)30,572$ Kelley Parkway - OCB Rd to Stone Bay (w/ Road M&O)5,450$ Dickenson Street (w/ Road reconstruct)8,557$ Glendale Drive (w/ Road reconstruct)5,047$ Orchard Park Road (w/ Road reconstruct)21,320$ Rest Point Lane (w/ Road reconstruct)4,279$ Park Lane (w/ Road reconstruct)8,777$ North Arm Drive (w/ Road reconstruct)44,962$ Willow Dr (Fox-Brown) (w/ Road reconstruct)34,763$ Street Stormwater Improvements 140,000$ 143,500$ 147,088$ 150,765$ 154,534$ 158,397$ 162,357$ 166,416$ 170,576$ 174,841$ 179,212$ Long Lake Ravine Stabilization (SWMP 7) Eat Long Lake Road Shoreline Restoration 102,500$ Casco Point Park Outlet (SWMP O-1)58,000$ Casco cove Outlet (SWMP O-2)80,000$ Casco Point Park Bioretention Basin (SWMP CB-1)55,000$ 5-Year CIP Planning Period Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Storm Sewer CIP Table A-8 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 5-Year CIP Planning Period South Casco Point Road Sump (SWMP CB-2)36,000$ Casco cove Bioretatnion Basin (CB-3)57,000$ East Long Lake Road N Improvements (SWMP LL-1)82,000$ Cherry Place Ravine Improvement (SWMP NA-1)23,000$ OCB Pipe Upsizing (Countryside south)88,500$ Kelly Avenue Drainage Improvements Surface Water Management Projects 100,000$ 160,000$ 164,000$ 168,100$ 172,303$ 176,610$ 181,025$ 185,551$ 190,190$ 194,944$ $199,818 $204,814 $209,934 Storm Sewer Improvements/ Replacements 200,000$ 205,000$ 210,125$ 215,378$ 220,763$ 226,282$ 231,939$ 237,737$ 243,681$ 249,773$ 256,017$ 262,417$ $268,978 $275,702 $282,595 Pond Cleaning/Maintenance (1/year)50,000$ 51,250$ 52,531$ 53,845$ 55,191$ 56,570$ 57,985$ 59,434$ 60,920$ 62,443$ $64,004 $65,604 $67,244 Totals 708,375$ 858,844$ 564,777$ 506,353$ 577,294$ 591,726$ 606,519$ 621,682$ 637,224$ 653,155$ 669,484$ 686,221$ 703,376$ 720,961$ 738,985$ Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Police CIP Table A-9 Purchase Expected Project Year Life (yrs)2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Squad 232 (Ford SUV) CSO 2014 5 $39,400 $40,500 $43,000 Squad 233 (Ford SUV)2014 5 $40,000 $42,500 $44,000 Squad 242 (Ford SUV)2015 5 $40,000 $42,500 $45,000 Squad 236 (Ford SUV)2015 5 $40,000 $42,500 $44,000 Squaed 238 (Ford SUV)2014 5 $38,000 $40,500 $43,000 Squad 235 (Durango) Chief 2014 5 $38,500 $41,000 $43,500 Squad 240 (Charger 2015 5 $40,000 $42,500 $45,000 Squad 237 (Ford SUV)2014 5 $38,000 $40,500 $43,000 Squard 243 (Ford SUV)2015 5 $38,500 $41,000 $43,500 Squad 229 (Charger)2013 5 $40,000 $42,000 $44,000 Squad 227 (Charger)2012 5 $40,000 $42,000 $44,000 Squad 228 (Charger)2012 5 $40,000 $42,000 $44,000 Squad 841 (Mound)2011 5 $38,000 $40,500 $43,000 Squad 843 (Mound) Tahoe/Special Use 2010 5 $40,000 $42,500 $45,000 Squad 223 (Escape) Investigations DP 2010 5 $40,000 $42,500 $45,000 Squad 853 (Equinoux) Investigations 2008 5 $39,000 $40,000 $41,000 Squad 230 (Tahoe) SRO/Reserves 2013 5 $40,000 $42,500 $44,000 Squad 231 WMDTF (Forfeiture Funds)2008 TBD $38,500 $41,000 ATV Yamaha Grizzly 450 2004 TBD ERU Vehicle (Ford Ambulance) 234 2005 TBD Technology Replacement $10,609 $10,927 $11,255 $11,593 $11,941 $12,299 $12,668 $13,048 $13,439 $13,842 $14,258 $14,685 $15,126 $15,580 $16,047 Weapons - Rifles $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Weapons - Handguns $20,000 $20,000 Supported or Partially Funded through Police Account in the PIR Fund Mobile Radios $50,000 Squad Video Cameras $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 Mobile Data Computer $5,305 $5,464 $5,628 $5,796 $5,970 $6,149 $6,334 $6,524 $6,720 $6,921 $7,129 $7,343 $7,563 $7,790 $8,024 Portable Radios Police Records Updgrade (LOGIS) Totals $189,314 $131,891 $175,883 $152,389 $247,911 $180,448 $157,002 $185,572 $147,659 $205,764 $198,386 $114,028 $200,689 $160,370 $229,071 NOTES: *Funding for the Police CIP is accounted for in the General Fund to accurately charge our contract cities for the cost of policing. 5-Year CIP Planning Period Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Park Fund Current Balance:$797,067 22525000 Table B-1 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Operation and Maintenance (1)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CIP Expenditures $339,500 $347,750 $110,902 $110,000 $0 $4,775 $64,946 $0 $5,068 $0 $70,300 $5,378 $0 $0 $81,802 Total Expenses $339,500 $347,750 $110,902 $110,000 $0 $4,775 $64,946 $0 $5,068 $0 $70,300 $5,378 $0 $0 $81,802 Revenues (2)$10,500 $4,681 $1,250 $153 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Annual Balance ($329,000)($343,069)($109,652)($109,847)$0 ($4,775)($64,946)$0 ($5,068)$0 ($70,300)($5,378)$0 $0 ($81,802) Year End Cash Balance $468,067 $124,998 $15,346 ($94,501)($94,501)($99,276)($164,222)($164,222)($169,290)($169,290)($239,590)($244,967)($244,967)($244,967)($326,769) Improvement/Equipment Outlay Fund Current Balance:$468,831 Table B-2 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Equipment, CIP $186,300 $516,900 $342,800 $450,000 $253,100 $77,500 $600,000 $535,800 $37,000 $90,461 $60,000 $482,800 $577,932 $278,000 $340,376 Building CIP $215,000 $54,050 $139,560 $700,760 $75,000 $320,000 $0 $209,000 $22,523 $0 $38,643 $160,000 $164,000 $168,100 $172,303 IT, CIP $130,274 $19,917 $17,665 $82,717 $14,923 $9,434 $15,800 $19,371 $21,048 $6,229 $17,766 $42,734 $17,700 $5,871 $39,548 Golf, CIP $41,400 $26,885 $80,000 $160,000 $316,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses $572,974 $617,752 $580,025 $1,393,477 $659,723 $406,934 $615,800 $764,171 $80,571 $96,690 $116,409 $685,534 $759,632 $451,971 $552,226 Revenues (Transfer)$215,000 $215,000 $255,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 Transfer from Enterprise Funds $5,000 $400,000 $83,000 $450,000 $0 $37,000 $600,000 $145,500 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $0 Annual Balance ($352,974)($2,752)($242,025)($628,477)($344,723)($54,934)$299,200 ($303,671)$234,429 $218,310 $198,591 ($290,534)($444,632)($136,971)($237,226) Year End Cash Balance $115,857 $113,105 ($128,920)($757,397)($1,102,120)($1,157,055)($857,855)($1,161,526)($927,097)($708,787)($510,196)($800,730)($1,245,363)($1,382,334)($1,619,560) Improvement/Equipment Outlay Fund - Long Lake Fire Account Current Balance:$370,883 Table B-3 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Long Lake Fire CIP $310,250 $18,275 $42,500 $19,550 $42,500 $423,300 $72,250 $0 $106,250 $425,000 $21,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses $310,250 $18,275 $42,500 $19,550 $42,500 $423,300 $72,250 $0 $106,250 $425,000 $21,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue - General Fund Transfer (2)$85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 Revenues - Interest (2)$5,000 $1,506 $2,189 $2,636 $3,316 $3,775 $429 $561 $1,417 $1,218 $0 $0 $0 $168 $1,020 Annual Balance ($220,250)$68,231 $44,689 $68,086 $45,816 ($334,525)$13,179 $85,561 ($19,833)($338,782)$63,750 $85,000 $85,000 $85,168 $86,020 Year End Cash Balance $150,633 $218,864 $263,553 $331,639 $377,455 $42,929 $56,109 $141,670 $121,837 ($216,945)($153,195)($68,195)$16,805 $101,973 $187,993 Community Investment Fund Current Balance:$544,258 408-25000 Table B-4 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Annual Expenditures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Community Improvement CIP $0 $0 $568,970 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Debt Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1 Total Expenses $0 $0 $568,970 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1 Revenues (interest)$5,000 $5,493 $5,548 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Year End Cash Balance $549,258 $554,751 ($8,672)($8,672)($8,672)($8,672)($8,672)($8,672)($8,672)($8,672)($8,672)($8,672)($8,672)($8,672)($8,673) Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono MSA Fund Current Fund Balance:$0 State MSA Construction Balance =$550,000 Table B-5a Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Annual Expenditures (MSA CIP)$75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,567 $209,969 $327,763 $312,156 $312,156 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Annual MSA Maintenance Payment to the City $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 Debt Service (interest) - from MSA maintenance account.$36,288 $33,138 $29,838 $26,388 $22,938 $19,188 $14,813 $10,125 $5,250 Debt Service (Principal) - from MSA Construction Account $105,000 $110,000 $115,000 $115,000 $120,000 $125,000 $125,000 $130,000 $140,000 Total Expenses $255,725 $182,575 $184,275 $180,825 $182,375 $409,192 $389,219 $507,326 $496,844 $351,594 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 Yearly Allocation - MSA Maintenance $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 Yearly Allocation - MSA Construction $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 Annual Balance $69,859 $143,009 $141,309 $144,759 $143,209 ($83,608)($63,635)($181,742)($171,260)($26,010)$286,147 $286,147 $286,147 $286,147 $286,147 Year End Cash Balance $69,859 $212,868 $354,177 $498,936 $642,145 $558,537 $494,902 $313,161 $141,901 $115,892 $402,038 $688,185 $974,331 $1,260,478 $1,546,624 Pavement Management Fund Current Balance:$462,233 43525000 Table B-5b Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Annual Operation and Maintenance (1)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CIP Expenditures $1,056,295 $737,484 $607,152 $731,498 $383,943 $919,769 $750,000 $764,000 $778,280 $792,846 $807,703 $822,857 $838,314 $854,080 $870,162 Total Expenses $1,056,295 $737,484 $607,152 $731,498 $383,943 $919,769 $750,000 $764,000 $778,280 $792,846 $807,703 $822,857 $838,314 $854,080 $870,162 Revenues (1)$0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 Pavement Management Levy $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 Annual Balance ($511,845)($193,034)($62,702)($187,048)$460,507 ($75,319)$94,450 $80,450 $66,170 $51,604 $36,747 $21,593 $6,136 ($9,630)($25,712) Year End Cash Balance ($49,612)($242,646)($305,348)($492,396)($31,889)($107,208)($12,758)$67,692 $133,862 $185,466 $222,213 $243,807 $249,943 $240,313 $214,602 Water Fund Current Balance:$774,118 60111111 Table B-6 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Annual Operation and Maintenance (1)$847,710 $868,903 $890,625 $912,891 $935,713 $959,106 $983,084 $1,007,661 $1,032,852 $1,058,674 $1,085,140 $1,112,269 $1,140,076 $1,168,578 $1,197,792 Debt Service $135,000 $157,000 $156,000 $155,000 $158,000 $101,500 $100,000 $100,000 $100,500 $104,000 $100,600 $103,000 $0 $0 $0 CIP Expenditures $474,855 $800,180 $821,415 $345,845 $379,052 $277,154 $302,833 $898,628 $444,544 $520,581 $306,742 $313,031 $384,449 $325,999 $482,685 Total Expenses $1,457,565 $1,826,083 $1,868,040 $1,413,736 $1,472,765 $1,337,760 $1,385,916 $2,006,289 $1,577,896 $1,683,254 $1,492,483 $1,528,300 $1,524,524 $1,494,577 $1,680,477 Revenues (1)$681,550 $701,997 $723,056 $744,748 $767,091 $790,103 $813,806 $838,221 $863,367 $889,268 $915,946 $952,584 $981,162 $1,010,596 $1,040,914 Add back Depreciation $207,400 $225,800 $241,400 $262,700 $272,300 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 Assessments $10,387 $10,387 $10,387 $10,387 $10,387 $10,387 $10,387 $10,387 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Annual Balance ($558,228)($887,899)($893,197)($395,901)($422,987)($243,270)($267,723)($863,682)($420,529)($499,986)($282,536)($281,716)($249,363)($189,980)($345,562) Year End Cash Balance $215,890 ($672,009)($1,565,206)($1,961,107)($2,384,095)($2,627,364)($2,895,087)($3,758,769)($4,179,298)($4,679,284)($4,961,821)($5,243,536)($5,492,899)($5,682,879)($6,028,442) Sewer Fund Current Balance:$2,585,816 60211111 Table B-7 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Operation and Maintenance (1)$1,624,175 $1,664,779 $1,706,399 $1,749,059 $1,792,785 $1,837,605 $1,883,545 $1,930,634 $1,978,900 $2,028,372 $2,079,081 $2,131,058 $2,184,335 $2,238,943 $2,294,917 Debt Service $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CIP Expenditures $804,068 $1,096,720 $875,169 $853,924 $792,644 $797,119 $705,210 $684,650 $704,506 $724,942 $745,972 $767,616 $789,891 $812,815 $836,407 Transfer to Equipment Fund for Sewer Equip $0 $100,000 $31,500 $0 $450,000 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $3,051,758 $3,131,324 Total Expenses $2,538,243 $2,971,499 $2,723,068 $2,712,983 $3,145,429 $2,634,724 $2,623,755 $2,615,283 $2,683,406 $2,753,314 $2,825,054 $2,898,674 $3,054,226 $6,103,516 $6,262,648 Revenues (1)$1,427,010 $1,484,090 $1,543,454 $1,605,192 $1,669,400 $1,736,176 $1,805,623 $1,877,848 $1,952,962 $2,031,080 $2,112,323 $2,196,816 $2,284,689 $2,376,077 $2,471,120 Add back Depreciation $330,000 $353,600 $382,200 $402,000 $416,200 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 Assessments $35,349 $35,349 $30,368 $26,934 $24,902 $17,569 $17,569 $10,939 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($675,682)($660,205) Annual Balance ($745,884)($1,098,460)($767,046)($678,856)($1,034,927)($441,679)($361,263)($287,197)($289,144)($282,933)($273,430)($262,558)($330,237)($3,963,821)($4,012,433) Year End Cash Balance $1,839,932 $741,473 ($25,573)($704,429)($1,739,357)($2,181,036)($2,542,299)($2,829,495)($3,118,640)($3,401,573)($3,675,003)($3,937,561)($4,267,798)($8,231,619)($12,244,052) Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Storm Water Fund Current Balance:$1,763,437 65111111 Table B-8 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Operation and Maintenance (1)$356,810 $365,730 $374,874 $384,245 $393,851 $403,698 $413,790 $424,135 $434,738 $445,607 $456,747 $468,166 $479,870 $491,867 $504,163 CIP Expenditures $708,375 $858,844 $564,777 $506,353 $577,294 $591,726 $606,519 $621,682 $637,224 $653,155 $669,484 $686,221 $703,376 $720,961 $738,985 Transfer to Equipment Fund for Storm Equip $0 $100,000 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $12,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses $1,065,185 $1,324,574 $939,651 $965,598 $971,145 $995,424 $1,032,310 $1,645,817 $1,071,963 $1,098,762 $1,126,231 $1,154,387 $1,183,246 $1,212,827 $1,243,148 Revenues (1)$296,160 $325,776 $358,354 $394,189 $433,608 $476,969 $524,666 $577,132 $634,845 $698,330 $768,163 $844,979 $929,477 $1,022,425 $1,124,667 Add back depreciation $53,500 $62,000 $74,900 $83,300 $91,600 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 Annual Balance ($715,525)($936,798)($506,397)($488,110)($445,937)($417,755)($406,944)($967,985)($336,417)($299,732)($257,368)($208,708)($153,069)($89,703)($17,781) Year End Cash Balance $1,047,912 $111,114 ($395,283)($883,393)($1,329,330)($1,747,085)($2,154,029)($3,122,015)($3,458,432)($3,758,164)($4,015,532)($4,224,240)($4,377,309)($4,467,012)($4,484,793) 40625000 Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund Current Balance:$1,244,883 Amount Available for Police Purchases =$268,823 Table B-9 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Police Expenses $20,305 $5,464 $5,628 $20,796 $55,970 $6,149 $21,334 $6,524 $6,720 $21,921 $7,129 $7,343 $7,563 $7,790 $8,024 Total Expenses $20,305 $5,464 $5,628 $20,796 $55,970 $6,149 $21,334 $6,524 $6,720 $21,921 $7,129 $7,343 $7,563 $7,790 $8,024 Revenues $5,000 $12,296 $12,364 $12,431 $12,348 $11,912 $11,969 $11,876 $11,929 $11,981 $11,882 $11,929 $11,975 $12,019 $12,062 Annual Balance ($15,305)$6,832 $6,737 ($8,365)($43,622)$5,762 ($9,365)$5,352 $5,210 ($9,940)$4,753 $4,587 $4,412 $4,229 $4,038 Year End Cash Balance $1,229,579 $1,236,411 $1,243,147 $1,234,782 $1,191,160 $1,196,922 $1,187,557 $1,192,909 $1,198,119 $1,188,179 $1,192,932 $1,197,518 $1,201,931 $1,206,160 $1,210,198 NOTES: (1) Expenses and Revenues are based on the City's 2011 budget. For Planning purposes a 2.5% annual inflation factor has been used to project future costs. (2) Revenues are based on a 1.5% increased contribution starting in 2016 and adding a 1% interest earned on the previous year's balance.