The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-12-1999 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 12,1999, 7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. 6:00 P.M. TOWNLINE ROAD INFORMATIONAL MEETING ROLL CALL 1. 7:00 P.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - ORONO ORCHARDS SEWER PROJECT A. Adopt Orono Orchards Sewer Assessment - Resolution B. Award Contract for Orono Orchards Sewer - Resolution q CONSENT AGENDA 2. Approve/Amend APPROVAL OF MINUTES ♦ 3. Regular Meeting of March 22, 1999 % % PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Andrew McDermott, Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) 7n:^.ING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 4. #2439 Service 800 Road Agreement - Waive Deadline 5. #2451 Lyle and Gretchen Shaw, 1780 Shady'wood Road - Variances - Resolution 6. #2461 Chris Pierson, on behalf of William and Thelma Bryson, James A. R. Johnson, 650, 660, 670 and 680 Big Island - Subdivision 7. #2462 David Lovelace, 220 Big Island - Variance - Resolution 8. #2465 Robert Erickson, 364 and 372 Westlake Street - Lot Line Rearrangement 9. #2466 James Renckens, having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road - 2 Lot Preliminary Subdivision 10. #2467 Bohland Development, having an interest in 1025 Brown Road South - 6 Lot Preliminary Subdivision - Resolutions 11. #2471 Independent School District #278, 685 Old Crystal Bay Road North A. Conditional Use Permit for Middle School at 800 Old Crystal Bay Road North - Resolution B. Variance and Conditional Use Permit Amendment for Orono High School - 795 Old Crystal Bay Road North - Resolution 12. Authorization to Hold Public Hearing for Woodhill Country Club Conditional Use Permit at a Special Council Meeting MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 12, 1999, 7:00 P,M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA ENGINEER REPORT 13. Request for Payment #2 - Lift Station #12 Rehabilitation 14. Request for Payment #6 - Navarre Water Plant Rehabilitation 15. Change Order #2 - Navarre Water Plant Rehabilitation CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 16. Hamm Sewer Request - Resolution 17. Appointment of a City Contart Person to the Orono School District's Healthy Communities/Healthy Youth Program 18. Resignation of Jamie Gemar, Secretary 19. Update of New Area Code Options 20. Scheduling Informational Open Houses Regarding Comprehensive Plan 21. Resignation of Elizabeth Van Zomeren, Planner/Zoning Administrator 22. Minnesota Rules Amendments Related to Septic Systems (January 1996 to March 1999) 23. Investment Report 23a. King's Cove Marina, 1449 Shoreline Drive - Request for Temporary Above-Ground Gasoline Tank CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT 24. LICENSES Special Event - ASID Showcase Home Preview Event and Tour Special Events * Kennel Licenses * 25. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES AND EVENTS 1999 04/05 - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 04/07 - Highway 12 Design Review Committee Meeting, 5:30 p.m. 04/12 - Townline Road Informational Meeting, 6:00 p.m. 04/12 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 04/19 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 04/24 - Spring Cleanup Day, 8:00 a m. - 2:00 p.m. 04/26 - Park Volunteer Recognition, 6:30 p.m. 04/26 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 04/28 - Board of Review, 7:00 p.m. 05/03 - Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p m. 05/05 - Highway 12 Design Review Committee Meeting, 5:30 p.m. 05/08 - Spring Cleanup Day-Construction Debris Only, 8:00 a m. - 2:00 p.m. 05/10 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 05/17 - Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30 p.m. 05/24 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 05/31 - HOLIDAY - Memorial Day Observance Public Attendance Meeting Date Council Planning Commission Park Commission Other ;; •• . ... Please FILL our the information REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 1. i-r^a (1 ^ ■ • N ^ . 1 ^'L J4U’J:?A' f^/cui. J /Da-^ ci \\L ft--w ^ , d. (i i /. V 5- C V^cr; . // 1 ^^o,v /' 7. 1 P»'c tr <.6v\As'*"^c ^^-i• )v(. k (. R. ^ 1 if r ,/\P0k:^L.A’cJ / 0 10 (-(v'^) ♦ iVi / l('r U ■ ✓ \.r\\ M ■,. d.‘ a ■—-.y;-------------------------------------------- A- /)T 14 htK ____/4 r___ is.rw V. D'^'j Itvi ,A r’ 0*U»S>- Public A ttendance Public A ttendance Meeting D ate C ouncil Planning C ommission Park C ommission Other LJ —d-f y . Ij PlJSASE^^^ m OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 1. ^ |(\ / Vi .r6'-V i 7 -}<' L-vJ-’^c •^^LmI 2._ 3. _ 4. _ 5. _ 6. - 7. _ 8. _ 9.. 10.. 11.. 12.. 13.. 14. 15._ 041395.4 COUNCIL MEETINQ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION APR I Z 19V9 CITY Oh UnUNO DATE: April 8, 1999 ITEM NO.: / Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer’s Report Item Description: Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Project Assessment Hearing Assessment Hearing An assessment hearing will be held for this project. The proposed project assessment is $16,000 per unit. This assessment was determined based on the increase in value to the property based on the installation of sewer. Sanitary Sewer Connection Time Limits Resident concern about the assessment amount has been expressed. Residents have questioned if deferral of the assessment or time for connection to the sewer is possible. The only assessment deferral option currently available is the senior citizen deferment. Assessment deferral for other situations is problematic and is probably not a feasible option. The idea of extending the time allowed for connection to the sewer may be easier for the City to accomplish. The current City code requires connection to the sewer within 16 months after installation of the sewer. For the Stubbs Bay sewer project, the required time limit for connection was extended to 5 years for properties that were further from Lake Minnetonka. The Stubbs Bay project was completed before the current 3 foot separation rule rendered many systems nonconforming. With the exception of several totally failing systems, the septic systems in Orono Orchards are nonconforming to the 3 foot separation rule. One idea, would be to allow property owners with nonconforming systems to the 3 foot separation rule, to defer hookup for 5 years similar to the Stubbs Bay sewer project. However, failing systems with surface discharge would be required to connect to sewer within *'0 days. If c/i extension was granted for nonconforming systems, hookup would be required within 90 days if the system failed and surface discharge occurred. If the Council views an extended connection time favorable, there are two options available. The first option would be to allow all properties an extended hookup time. The other option would be to require connection to the sewer within 16 months, unless a hardship exists and Council approval is obtained for an extension. We are requesting Council consideration of the options fo. deadlines for connection to the sewer system. Request for Council Action continued Page 2 April 8, 1999 Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Project Assessment Hearing Adoption of the Assessment Attached is a resolution adopting the assessment. This resolution lists an interest rate of 8%. This interest rate can be adjusted downward dependent on the interest rate received on this year ’s bond sale. In order for the assessment to be appealed, written notification must be presented at the assessment hearing. Pending no appeals received, we are recommending approval of the resol u'lon adopting the assessment. Award of the Contract Attached is a resolution awarding the contract for this project to Widmer, Inc. Pending adoption of the assessment, we are recommending the award of the contract. Award of the contract now- should allow for an early start of the project sometime in May. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Consideration of a policy on a 5 year deadline for connection to sewer for properties with nonconforming septic system to the 3 foot separation rule. Approval of the resolution adopting the assessment for the Orono Orchards sanitary sewer project. Approval of the resolution awarding the contract to Widmer, Inc. for the Orono Orchards sanitary sewer project. ORDINANCE M105, 2nd Series AN ORDINANCE TO EXEMPT PROPERTIES WITHIN THE STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT AREA FROM THE PROVISIONS OF OFONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 12.30, SUBDIVISION 4 (B)(1) AND ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR CONNECTION TO SEWER FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the City Council of the ^ (hereinafter "the City") has ordered the ^*'stallatxon of municipal sewer trunk lines and laterals to serve the Stu Y area; and / WHEREAS, the Stubbs Bay sewer project area 4^7 properties or groups of properties which said sewer connection stubs brought to the proper Y Jo-f^ribed by properties and groups of propertxes bexng legally descrxbed by Property Identification Numbers in Exhibit A attached; and HHBRBAS, the Stubbs Bay sewer project is be complete and available for connectxon xn late 1992 o Y 1993; and WHEREAS, Municipal Code Section 12.30, ? (B) (1) requires that the owners of all the Citysewer becomes available shall connect such ^uiiarngs to the City sewer within 16 months of the availability of the sewer, and WBEREftS, in order to reduce the immediate *^"®'’‘'the burden on homeowners in the Stubbs Bay £’'orthe «aiiredCity Council has agreed to extend the length of the requirec connection period for properties in the project area. HOW THBREPORB# the City Council of Orono does hereby ordain: section 1. The owners of Properties wi^thin th® Stubbs^Baj ^SSiSi|a ”^c"d\‘‘sectirn%2^^^^^^^ 4 (B) (1), but shall be subject to the following provxsxons: .......1. .. The owners of properties «hich fall into one or mor^^^ ••• • 1 rtwi*no catecrorxes shall connect tne exxsti y residence to municipal sewer within 90 days of i s availability: Page 1 of 3 Ordinance #105, 2nd Series 2. 3. 4. a. Properties with septic systems that are discharging to the surface. b. Properties using holding tanks as a primary or partial method of sewage disposal. The owners of properties which fall into o category shall connect the exxstrng municipal sewer within 16 months of xts avaxlability. a Properties located within 500 feet shoreline of Stubbs Bay which have 35 trenches or beds located less '^''en the required 36 inch vertical separation above distance is measured to the bottom of the rock xn the trench or bed. b. Properties that have drainfields • 75' from the shoreline of Stubbs Bay or Stu Y Creek. c. Properties that have drainfields located less than the State minimum 50' separation from a well. The owners of all properties '3° co\°nlSt «e4-oTn failure during the 60 month connectxon perxod lhall mike such connection within 90 days of notice of such failure. Diltlict is determined to be classified non-conforming ILVbui^'d\n1p%"rldl'’or=vir?a^^^^^^^ n^o°n-lo\%o^^rg ira?io^n^ Page 2 of 3 r.- . . »• ^ • • Ordinance #105, 2nd Series 5.If during the 60 month connection period, the City initiates a program to determine the conformity classification of all septic systems in the Shoreland Overlay District, the Stubbs Bay sewer project area shall be exempt from such program to the extent that any systems classified as non-conforming solely as a result of such program shall not be subject to the normal one year non—conformity elimination deadline. Section 2. Effective date. This ordinance shall be effective upon publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota this 27th day of July , 1992. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ORONO ORCHARDS AREA SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of sanitary sewer in the Orono Orchards area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1999 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1999. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. Partial prepayment may be allowed in accordance with ordinances which are existing or which the City may choose to adopt in the future. Page 1 of 2 4.The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council of Orono this 12th day of April, 1999. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 2 of 2 A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN THE ORONO ORCHARDS AREA WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the installation of sanitary sewer improvements in the Orono Orchards improvement area, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law; and WHEREAS, it appears that Widmer, Inc., St. Bonifacius, Minnesota is the lowest responsible bidder. Minnesota: 1. 2. 12, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a construction contract with Widmer, Inc., St. Bonifacius, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Orono for the installation of sanitary sewer improvements in the Orono Orchards area according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk in the amount of $424,713.50. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Orono City Council at a regular Council meeting held on April ATTEST: Linda S. Vce, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Paee 1 of 1 BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK © 6516361311 03/18/99 11:33 & :02/05 N0:07: ^ J Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik St Ivll Associates Engineers & Architects OofifUttjO, Af^Jrftik AligiK'itf I Iru. o .*n AtttO*t/Ct4u*tl C^pOttunity Cinf^oyti f*nnctr%ilS’Otto 0 Honi*\fro»« • jotrpn i* Ar»rl#«iliii. Pl>‘ •M.wy.ni \orv.«l.^ • Richjrdl.Tu/ntf. fe •Gicnnft Coon. Ffc • «03c/t G Scrtjnicm n • JCffy A Houfdon. Fi • Robert *JI/. Roifne. PR jtfu] M. CUeilm C PA. Serxir Curisull.niU Al/OfMfP A//rc/p#/i:Howard A Sanford. Ft • Kcnh A Gorj-^n Ft • Koocri t rreitctre Ft • Rfcnarfl w tomr. PC t oavio O rt • toLen C Rmicii am • Maa a nanion Ft • Michatl T. Rjiuimann. PC • Ted K ridd. PC • P. Andttvon PC • M.-'ik P Roffi. PC. • Sidney P. WiHi^nr^pn. PC. I-S • Rm»e»i f Itiilir in • Ayi»^*. M Riny • MuiMetr. R.tu P.C • AiMo ftiik ScivntdU FC. C)//rcrt Si Fi*ol, Porhrsfer. •X/ill»n.ii ^nr; St C*inurl. MN • AMw Kjiee Ud wwwbone\trnn com March 17. 1999 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Orono 2750 Kelly Pk\v7 PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re:City of Orono Orono Orchard Sanitary Sewer BRA File No. 139-98-101 Honorable Mayor and City Council: Bids were opened for the project slated above on March 17, 1999. Transmitted herewith are ten (10) copies of the bid tabulation fo»' your information and file. Copies will also be distributed to each bidder. There were a total of 7 bids. The following summarizes the result.s of the low 5 bids received. Contractor Low Widmer, Inc. #2 Penn Contracting #3 G L Contracting, Inc. ttA Barbarossa & Sons. Inc. #5 Burschvillc Construction, Inc. Bid Amount $424,713.50 $447,340.00 $454,420.45 $490,514.00 $515,212.50 'Ihc low bidder on the project was Widmer, InC. with t base bid of $424,713.50. These bids have been reviewed and found in order. Therefore, we recommend that the project be awarded to Hidmer, Jnc.for the base bid amount of $424,713.50. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. My direct dial phone number is (651) 604 4843. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC, Glenn R. Cook Enclosures GRCrjins Highway 36 • $t. Paul. MN 55113 • 651*636*4600 • Fax: 651*636*1311 |8 8Cim 8 88 Zi 8 s Id a» VI 1 l||i' ' iF ! I 88 29•f 8 9 88 §sS as ! J p8 8 Sillds si 88 88 §2 8 8 I S^ 5q 888 SS^m i 1 I 'I I 88 32 8 ll 2r •*11 11, 8~ 8 a M 2 8«•=Hs2 U cia a s !d i I S‘«4 v» I 1»9 88 8 SSH i S8 j I a« P^ll illlL ^88 8 #111 88 8 8 II I § •- •f di !i! I N I 0. li 88 8 “I I 88 8 i§ I ill IL,Nlll llllil 888 8 88ml I ^ 8 3•- o 8 889 « ^ ® H8 8 8^ ai V oi V- 8-a s I 51 §8 8 I n II i ? 3 88 8 3 «% M I . _ I®! IS 8 8 8 8 8 8 0;|«1 <rt « III I % s -5^1r iP jjiiiiiiip SR 8 s; 88 8 kiv# Kin cla\1__hJO . ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22,1999 V, ^!Ty.< h >> 3 ROLL CALL The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Richard Flint, Barbara Peterson, and Bob Sansevere. Council Member Charles Kelley was absent. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Pianner/Zoning Administrator Elizabeth Van Zomeren, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. (#1) 7:00 P.M. - PUBLIC HEARING. 7:01 p.m. -7:04 p.m. On Sate and Sunday Liquor License - Spring Hill Golf Club at 725 Sixth Avenue North City Administrator Ron Moorse stated that the Spring Hill Golf Club is requesting an On Sale and Sunday Intoxicating Liquor License. Although an on sale liquor license is usually issued to a restaurant open to the general public, the State Liquor Control Commission has indicated it is possible to consider club members and their guests to be the general public for purposes of the liquor license. Private golf clubs generally obtain a "Club" liquor license; however, a club license requires the private golf club to be in existence for a minimum of three years. The Spring Hill Golf Club will not meet this requirement until the year 2000. Moorse indicated all the required reviews have been completed. The Police Department has also completed their background investigation and has indicated no objections to granting the license. City Attorney Barrett commented Orono's ordinance Is identical to State Statutes regulating liquor licenses and he is willing to accept the State Liquor Control Commission's interpretation of that statute. Mayor Jabbour noted that the Spring Hill Golf Club will be required to obtain a "Club" liquor license after three years. There were no public comments. Flint commented that it should be understood that Spring Hill Golf Club will obtain a "Club" liquor license once eligible. Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the application of Spring Hill Club for an On Sale and Sunday Intoxicating Liquor License at 725 Sixth Avenue North. VOTE; Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#2) This item follows Item #8. Pagel ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22.1999 (#3) CONSENT AGENDA Items 6,10,11,13,14,16,17,19, 20, 22, and 24 were added to the Consent Agenda. Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES • Regular Meeting of March 8.1999 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of March 8,1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Special Meeting of March 16,1999 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the minutes of the Special City Council meetingof March 16,1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS • Peter Welles, Representative None PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS None PUBLIC COMMENTS Shelly Storch, 1245 Woodhill Avenue, stated she would like to comment on the lawsuit filed by Woodhill Country Club. Storch indicated their land was acquired by their developer from Woodhill Country Club who had purchased the land originally from Mr. Pillsbury. The sale was dependent on approval of the subdivision. Storch stated the development of the subdivision went well until last May when the Woodhill Country Club started construction of a private road to the country club due to improvements to Highway 15, which work was subsequently stopped by the City. Storch indicated their neighborhood has incurred approximately $10,000 in legal fees and additional engineering fees to contest the lawsuit filed by Woodhill Country Club. Storch noted that an affidavit has recently been produced by Woodhill Country Club from Mr. Pillsbury wherein he supports the country club's position, which Storch finds difficult to accept. Storch urged the City of Orono to allow the judicial process to be followed through and the facts to be evaluated by a judge. Storch «ndicated she received a phone message from the president of the Woodhill Country Club who indicated that the private roadway was intended to be open only on a temporary basis while the improvements to Highway 15 were being completed and would only be open to club members. Jerry Storch, 1245 Woodhill Avenue, stated it is their understanding that the City Council Is considering allowing the road to Woodhill Country Club to be open on a permanent basis, which in his opinion would be unsafe and unjust to the surrounding property owners. Storch noted the Page 2 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22,1999 Public Comments, continued) position of the country club has changed over time with the country club now pursuing permanent access. Storch indicated they were led to believe at the time of their purchase that they were purchasing a house on a cul-de-sac, which would not be the case should this road be approved. Storch urged the City Council to keep this road access closed. Mayor Jabbour commented that it was the City’s position they would not act on this matter until the proper public process has been completed. The City has requested from the beginning that Woodhill Country Club go through the appropriate public process, and at this time the City has not made a determination as to the status of the roadway. The City is currently in the process of discovery and no decision will be made by the City until the appropriate public process has been completed. Jabbour stated it is the intent of the City Council to deal with this matter in good faith and this issue is open for discussion between the residents of Orono and Woodhill Country Club. Storch noted that they have not sought out publicity on this issue but have approached the City in a good faith effort in order to arrive at a just solution to this problem. Jabbour commented that it is not his desire to discuss this issue at length since the country club is not represented at tonight's meeting, but he would like the citizens to know that they do have the right to be heard on this issue. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT •(#6) #2227 GARY TUCKER, 3466 IVY PLACE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4257 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve Application #2227, 3466 Ivy Place, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4257, a Resolution Granting an Amendment to a Variance to Permit a Change to the Roof Line for Property Located at 3466 Ivy Place. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#7) #2451 LYLE AND GRETCHEN SHAW, 1780 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES Moorse indicated the Applicant has requested that this item be removed from tonight's agenda and be set on the April 12th agenda. Weinberger stated a letter extending the time period through May has been sent to the Applicants. Peterson moved, Flint seconded, to table Application #2451,1780 Shadywood Road, to the April 12 City Council meeting at the request of the Applicants. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#8) #2458 ZONING CODE AMENDMENT - LR-1C-1, ONE FAMILY LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL Mayor Jabbour indicated the City Attorney has some concerns regarding this item and would like the Planning Commission to review this item again. City Attorney Barrett stated there are findings of fact that the Planning Commission should review before arriving at a determination. Page 3 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22.1999 (#2458 Zoning Code Amendment, continued) Mayor Jabbour commented that this item shouid be discussed jointly with the Planning Commission and the City Council, and suggested that this item be discussed at their Thursday morning workshop. Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to have the Planning Commission review the Zoning Code Amendment again due to new findings of fact that are now available. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#9) #2465 ROBERT ERICKSON, 364 AND 372 WESTLAKE STREET - LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT Robert Erickson, Applicant, was present. Michaei Cronin, Deveioper, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are proposing a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement that results in two substandard tots located at 364 and 372 Westlake Street. These parcels contain houses and a number of accessory buildings that would be removed prior to new home construction. The Applicants have agreed to deed a portion of their property to the City for the east half of a future cul-de-sac at the end of Westlake Street and have requested the City give credit to both properties for hardcover and structural coverage for the land deeded. Weinberger stated for the property located at 389 Westlake the access Is off of an alley that is platted and it is unlikely that access will ever be obtained for that parcel off of Westlake due to existing topography. The property located at 372 Westlake Street is comprised of 2.01 acres, which meets the minimum lot size required by the zoning code, and contains a homestead and two rental cabins which are all vacant at this time and are scheduled to be removed pending approval of this application. This property was assessed for one sewer unit, which has not yet been connected, and a SAC fee is required prior to connection. Staff would recommend sewer hookup for the newly proposed building site. Weinberger stated the property located at 364 Westlake Street is comprised of .65 acres and has a lot width at the street of 50 feet. The house currently located on the property is currently being used as a rental unit and is served with sanitary sewer. The Applicants intend to use the property as a rental unit until the property is sold. The Planning Commission has recommended that the structure be removed by January, 2000. The Applicants have proposed to remove, at their expense, the hardcover from a portion of Westlake Street south of the proposed cul-de-sac and to provide landscaping in that area. The road would be closed, not vacated, and the public would continue to have access to the lakeshore through the platted right-of-way. Weinberger stated the issues before the City Council tonight are whether or not the lot line rearrangement is acceptable; the impact the proposed cul-de-sac would have on the hardcover and Westlake Street; whether the location of the cul-de-sac is acceptable, and whether a portion of Westlake Street should be removed. Cronin requested that the City Council approve the application as submitted. Page 4 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22,1999 (#2465 Robert Erickson, continued) There were no public comments. It is the recommendation of City Staff and the Planning Commission that this application be approved based on the conditions contained in the March 17,1999 Staff report. Mayor Jabbour commented that the City is not in a position at this time to vacate a portion of the public roadway to the shoreline and that it should be City policy that lake access lanes not be vacated. Peterson remarked she has a problem with approving two non-conforming lots. Gaffron stated that this application will improve the present situation in that area. Sansevere suggested that signage be erected to show that there is a public access there. Cronin stated he is aware of the need to keep that roadway open for public use and the Applicants are willing to work with City Staff on this issue. Cronin indicated that no work would be done on this area until construction is commenced. Flint inquired whether the two lots could be combined to create one conforming tot. Gaffron stated one of the reasons Staff supports this application is because the lot line rearrangement will not increase density in this area. Flint stated he would be in agreement with this application if public access to the lake is provided. Sansevere inquired whether City Staff has explored any other options for these parcels. Weinberger stated Staff has looked at other options but feel that this proposal best meets both parties' goals, noting that it is easier to work with lots that are squared off more evenly. Edckson stated they have looked at other options but feel this arrangement works the best. Sansevere commented he would support this proposal. Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve Application #2465,364 and 372 Westlake Street, granting of a lot line rearrangement subject to the conditions outlined in the March 17,1999 Staff report. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#2) PRESENTATION BY SCOTT THOMAS • CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF MCWD BOARD OF MANAGERS Thomas addressed the City Council and requested their support of him as a candidate for the MCWD Board of Managers. Thomas stated he is a civil engineer with 20 years experience and has a good understanding of the watershed process. Thomas stated if elected to the MCWD Board of Managers his goals would be to, #1 . identify the resources in the watershed district deady and to list the expedations of the resources for the watershed distrld; #2, shift the focus of the board away from the day-to-operations; and #3, predict the future needs of the watershed district by looking at a 20 year window. Page 5 >* ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22.1999 (Presentation by Scott Thomas, continued) Thomas commented he would like to work closely with the City in achieving these goals. Mayor Jabbour remarked that the City has basically supported Mr. Reid In the past, noting that the City has not been requested to support anyone else for this board. Jabbour inquired how Thomas would go about improving the relationship between the participating cities and the watershed board Thomas stated in his view the board should function as a resource to the cities and to allow the cities to have better input into how the watershed district could be improved and maintained. One of his goals would be to develop and provide each city with a resource plan that would enable the cities to actively maintain their watershed district to a certain standard. Thomas commented that in his opinion there currently is a deficiency in predicting what issues will come up in the future and a failure on the part of the board to request input from the cities on how they would like the watershed district to be maintained. Thomas stated he would like to make it more of a joint effort before the board and the cities by developing an overall comprehensive plan for the watershed district. Sansevere indicated he is in support of Thomas ’ ideas and goals. Flint stated in his view there is too much emphasis being placed on engineering solutions, which are not resolving the problems. Flint remarked that the City of Orono is taking steps to insure that hardcover is limited along the lakeshore and to keep the area as natural as possible. Thomas stated In his view the board needs to have common sense solutions to the problems with the watershed district and to provide the communities with accurate and adequate information on how to best maintain the watershed district so they could enact ordinances to maintain and improve the water quality. Flint stated he is impressed with Mr. Thomas, but feels that the City should wait to see if there are any other applicants for this position before drafting a letter supporting a particular individual. Thomas indicated that his interview is on April 13. with the board voting on April 20th. Mayor Jabbour suggested this item be discussed at their Thursday morning work session and to authorize Staff to draft a letter supporting Mr. Thomas but to delay sending it until after the April 12th City Council meeting in the event that another candidate approaches the City requesting their support. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#15) HAMM SEWER REQUEST - 485 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD Bruce Palmer, on behalf of Edward Hamm, was present. Gaffron stated that the City has received an updated letter of request and a site evaluation report indicating that the potential drainfield site northeast of the house is usable; however, there are some minor downsides relating to use of the site. Number one, three large pine trees will have to be removed to make use of the primary site; and number two, a portion of a wooded newer-growth buffer area between the house and the road would have to be removed to make use of the alternate site. Page 6 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22.1999 (Hamm Sewer Request, continued) Gaffron stated that this 18 acre parcel is also limited in ihat it contains only one viable septic site and is unlikely that it could support more than two or three normal sized homes in total. With City sewer, the site might be able to accommodate as many as seven or eight homes based on a two acre minimum lot size. Palmer expressed concerns that the well would be located approximately 55 to 63 feet from the septic site, existing trees ana overgrowth would need to be removed, and the c'cse location of the septic site to the residence. Palmer stated in his opinion hookup to City sewer is reasonable in this case due to these concerns. Palmer noted that the Applicant is willing to assume the costs for sewer hookup and is willing to stipulate that future development will be limited. Gaffron commented that this residence is near to the City's existing sewer system. Mayor Jabbour stated if sewer hookup is approved, the City needs to demonstrate a hardship for this property. Jabbour commented the City needs to establish certain guidelines which should be considered before sewer hookup is approved for any application. Gaffron stated the findings of the City Council are incorporated into the resolution adopted by the Council. Flint noted this application satisfies three out of four criteria established by the Metro Council. Other factors cited by the City Council in support of this request included tree preservation, no costs to be borne by the taxpayers, the site will be restricted to three residences for future development, the fact that the existing three residences would require six septic sites and only two are available, the likelihood of needing to incorporate pumps and complex piping to make septic work on the site, and the risk of failure due to poor soils. Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the sewer request by Edward Hamm, 485 Orono Orchard Road, based on the recommendation of City Staff, subject to sewer hookup being limited to the three existing dwellings with a deed covenant being executed by the Applicant stating that this parcel can be developed into no more than three lots, and all costs of hookup being borne by the Applicant. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Jabbour stated at the joint meeting with the Long Lake City Council he suggested that a committee be formed with Long Lake to look at consolidation between Long Lake and Orono and to look at the long-term goals of the two communities. Jabbour suggested that Jim Murphy, Mark Engelbretson, Cliff Otten, and Maybeth Christiansen be considered for that committee. Flint recommended that the City took at appointing representatives from different sections of the community to give the committee an overall view of the City. Sansevere stated that in his view a representative from the Navarre area should be appointed provided they are well-qualified for this committee, noting that Rick Meyers is from the Navarre area. Flint commented that the Casco Point area should also be represented. Flint inquired how many representatives will need to be appointed to the committee. Page 7 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22, A999 (Mayor/Council Report, continued) Mayor Jabbour stated three representatives will be appointed. Peterson inquired whether an aitemate should be appointed. Mayor Jabbour suggested that Engelbretson could be the aitemate. Flint noted that the entire City will not be represented by only three appointees to this committee. Mayor Jabbour indicated that he will make sure the interests of the entire City are well represented. Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to form a joint committee with Long Lake and to direct City Staff to contact Jim Murphy, Maybeth Christiansen, and Cliff Often to see if they would be willing to serve on this committee. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Mayor Jabbour indicated he attended a meeting with the Mound School District who is faced with the problem of having their senior citizens displaced from the current senior center building, and that the City of Orono should take steps to gather more information concerning this issue. Jabbour stated that Minnetrista has offered the senior citizens a piece of land and bonding to have them relocate out in that area. ENGINEER REPORT *(#10) NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING - ORONO ORCHARDS SANITARY SEWER PROJECT - RESOLUTION NO. 4258 AND RESOLUTION NO. 4259 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4258, a Resolution Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment for Orono Orchards Area Sanitary Sewer. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4259, a Resolution for Hearing on Proposed Assessment Orono Orchards Area Sanitary Sewer. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. •(#11) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #5 - NAVARRE WATER TREATMENT REHABILITATION Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve Request for Payment #5, to Shank Constructors, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, In the amount of $59,759.00. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#12) BALDUR PARK SEWER PROJECT EASEMENT Moorse stated the City Council at the March 8th meeting ordered the preparation of a feasibility study for an assessment sanitary sewer project to serve the end of the Baldur Park peninsula. Moorse stated he would like authorization for City Staff to contact William Franklin to obtain a utility easement across his property. Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the recommended plan for obtaining an easement for the Baldur Park peninsula sanitary sewer extension project and Page 8 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22.1999 (Baldur Park Sewer Project, continued) authorization for staff to send letter to property owner regarding obtaining an easement for this project. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#13) HENNEPIN COUNTY ROAD 15 RESTRIPING PROJECT IN NAVARRE There was no City Council action on this matter. *(#14) ORDER PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STUBBS BAY ROAD CUL-DE-SAC Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve City Engineer preparation of plans and specifications to complete a Cooperative Agreement project with MnDOT for the closure of the TH12/Stubbs Bay Road intersection. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT, CONTINUED *(#16) INSURANCE AGENT OF RECORD AGREEMENT EXTENSION Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and authorize extension of the Agreement for Insurance Brokerage Services between Youngdahl Companies and the City of Orono, for an annual fee of $7,200, commencing January 1,1999 through January 1, 2000, and from year to year thereafter until canceled in writing by either party. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#17) 1999 INSURANCE BID AWARD Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to award the 1999 insurance package effective January 1,1999 to the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for the workers compensation coverage, $28,280; for the comprehensive municipal property and casualty package, $73,162; for the umbrella excess liability, $18,273; for the petrofund reimbursement, $595; for the open meeting law, $725; for the boiler and machinery, $1,412; for the surety bonds, $833; and for the golf course liquor liability, $582. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#18) CITY’S OFFICIAL COMMENTS TO MN/DOT REGARDING THE HIGHWAY 12 PRELIMINARY LAYOUT Moorse reviewed his March 18, 1999 memorandum regarding the City’s official comments to MnDOT regarding the Highway 12 Preliminary Layout. Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the City’s official comments regarding the Highway 12 preliminary layout as presented, or with changes as desired. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Page 9 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22, 1999 *(#19) APPROVAL OF SEASONAL GOLF COURSE EMPLOYEES Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve a seasonal employee, pay range of $6.70 to $7.45 per hour for the 1999 season. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the hiring of the employees listed at the proposed wage rates and under the applicable provisions of the PERA rules. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#20) RESOLUTION SUPPORTING REPEAL OF THE STATE SALES TAX FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PURCHASES - RESOLUTION NO. 4260 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4260, a Resolution Supporting Repeal of the State Sales Tax for Local Government Purchases. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (Items #21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28 follow Item #23) (#23) SCHEDULING A MEETING WITH TOWNLINE ROAD RESIDENTS REGARDING OPTIONS FOR TOWNLINE ROAD Mayor Jabbour requested that a letter be sent to the residents describing the Medina position, the impact the additional homes will have on their neighborhood, and what will happen to the road if the City constructs a cul-de-sac. Jabbour suggested a meeting be held to discuss this project before the next City Council meeting. Moorse stated he will schedule a meeting for 6:00 p.m., on April 12th. (#21) APPOINTMENT OF A CITY CONTACT PERSON TO THE ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT’S HEALTHY COMMUNITIES/HEALTHY YOUTH PROGRAM Moorse suggested in the interest of time, this item be continued to the next regular City Council meeting. Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to continue this item to the April 12 City Council meeting. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#22) LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR WECAN REQUEST FOR CDBG FUNDS Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to authorize City Staff to draft a letter of support for WeCAN regarding their CDBG grant application. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#24) RECEIPT OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING • 1997 FINANCIAL REPORT (INFORMATION ONLY) There was no City Council action on this matter. Page 10 « • ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22, 1999 ‘(#25) RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TAKING OF LAND BY EMINENT DOMAIN FOR EASEMENT PURPOSES FOR ACCESS TO THE SAGA HILL PARK AREA - RESOLUTION NO. 4261 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4261, a Resolution Authorizing the Taking of Land by Eminent Domain for Road, Trail, Drainage and Utilities Easement Purposes Related to the Saga Hill Park Area. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT City Attorney Barrett requested an executive session to discuss pending litigation OTHER ISSUES Flint noted that two special events will be held in Orono on May 2, 1999. Flint inquired whether anyone has contacted the Orono Police Department as far as traffic issues. Moorse indicated City Staff will notify the Orono Police Department of the upcoming events. ‘(#26) LICENSES Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the following licenses. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. Half Marathon May 2,1999 8:00 a.m. • 11:00 a.m. American Diabetes Association Bike Tour on Luce Line June 6,1999 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. •(#27) BILLS Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#28) APPOINTMENT OF PART-TIME POLICE OFFICER AND FULL-TIME COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER Moorse stated City Staff is recommending the hiring of a new part-time police officer. Moorse suggested the part-time CSC person be appointed to that position and a new CSO person be hired. Page 11 t » ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22. 1999 (Appointment of Part-Time Police Officer and Full-Time Community Service Officer, continued) Peterson indicated slie would like to see the new police officer be hired on a full-time basis. Jabbour commented that the position should be reviewed to determine whether full-time status is necessary. Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the hiring of Jeffrey Johnson as the part-time police officer and to approve the hiring of Robin Hoecht as the new CSO. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 1. Peterson was opposed because the position was on a part-time basis and not a full-time position, noting she is 100 percent in support of both candidates. ADJOURNMENT Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 9:15 p.m. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 12 v-^ 9 A 1 ^1 K < • 04 N COUNCIL MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION APR 1 z 1999 CITY OF UHONO Date: April 9, 1999 Item No. Department Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: Zoning Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Item Description: #2439 - Service 800 Road Agreement - Amendment Deadlines List of Exhibits A - First Amendment to Road Agreement & Transmittal Letter B - Page 3 of Existing Agreement C - Hugh Maynard Letter Requesting Waiver - March 31, 1999 D - Hugh Maynard Letter to MnDOT - April 1,1999 Cliff Otten has been successful in acquiring fee title to the Brimhall Triangle from the Daniels heirs. The next step was for Otten to apply to MnDOT for reconveyance of the property. While he is moving forward, his attorney Hugh Maynard has noted that that the title acquisition occurred after the deadline established in the Road Agreement. The deadlines were established merely to keep the process moving toward completion. Staff has no problem with recommending that Council agree to extend the March 15 deadline to March 31 for Otten's fee simple title acquisition (page 3 of Road Agreement). Further, staff has no problem extending the April 30 deadline for MnDOT's reconveyance approval for an additional month to May 31. Note that Otten has formally applied for the reconveyance (Exhibit D). COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Approve extending the March 15 deadline for Otten's fee simple title acquisition to March 31, and extend the deadline for MnDOT reconveyance approval to May 31, 1999. FROM LEONARD. STREET AND DEINARD (FRI) 4. 9‘99 9:S4/ST. 9:3:/NO. 42604S^:39 F 2 LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD A fAOr^M^lQNAL A>50CXATm>< April 9.1999 Bv Telecopier Hugh M. Ma\T.ard 612-335-1981 hmml562@leonard.com Michael Oaltrun City of Orono 2730 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 35323 Re: Brimhall Triangle; Our File 15251-1 Dear Mike: For next week’s meeting of the Orono City Council, I am pleased to enclose a proposed First Amendment to Roadway Agreement. It changes two deadlines in tite first sentence of paragraph 3 of the Roadway Agreement. Enclosed is a copy of page 3 of the Roadway Agreement showing the changes. Thank you for your continuing cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD Hugh M. Maynard cc w/encl: Stephen R. PHaum, Esq. Cliff Otten Jean Mork Bredeson Thomas Barrett, Esq. .5oSouTKFtMuST.iiT SumjjQo MlNSlArom. MiNNfSOTASUOl Tu Oll-iU-HOO F.a«n.jj5 LAW UFIICES IN MINNfAFULl^. SAINT ?Xi:i AND MANEATO FROM LEONARD. STREET AND DEINARD (FRI) 4. 9'99 9:S4 ST. 9:33.'XO. 42604S-SS9 ? 3 (space above resen-ed for recording information) FIRST AiMENDMENT TO ROAD AGREEMENT . 1999 a.sThat certain Road Agreement dated February 12,1999, and filed___________ Hennepin County Registrar of Tines Document No.____________by and among Green Valley Associates, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Developer ”). Clifford L. Otten and l.nui.se Wakefield Olicn, husband and wife (“Otten”) and the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City of Orono") is amended as follows; 1. The March 15, 1999 deadline in the first sentence of paragraph 3 is hereby changed to March 31, 1999. The parties acknowledge that the revised deadline has been met 2. The April 30, 1999 deadline in the first sentence of paragraph 3 is hereby changed to May 31. 1999. 3.All odier terms and conditions of the Roadway Agreement remain in f\ill force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to Road Agreement as of April__, 1999. CITY OF ORONO Clifford L. Ollcn Louise Wakefield Otten Its GRFEN VALLEY ASSOCIATES, INC. By: Jean Mork Bredeson, President W PrinteJ 4/9'W 9;03 AM 1 FROM LEONARD. STREET AND DEINARD (FRI) 4. 9'99 9:34/ST. 9:3S/NO. 4260433339 P 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1999 by Clifford Li, Otten and Louise Wakefield Otten, husband and wife day of NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) $s. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1999 by Jean Mork BrcUcaon, the President of Green Valley Associates, Inc., a Minnesota coiporation, on behalf of the corporation.. NOTARIAL STAMP OR. SEAL NOTARY PUTiLlC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) s$. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1999 by____________________________the_____________ day of and the of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the city. NOT.\RY PUBLIC THIS nSSTRUMENl WAS DRAFTED BY: Leonard, Street and Deinard (HMM) 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 1WS19M ROM LEONARD. STREET AND DEINARD IFRI) 4. 9’55 9:S4/'ST. 9:SS NO. 42604SS235 F of Minnesota ’s highway easement. There shall be a north-south right-of-way and an east- west nght-of-way. The north-south right-of-way shall be 70 feet wide and its centerline shall be the northeasterly CYtension of the centerline of Brimhall Avenue, os planed m LO.NC LAKE COM^ffiRCIAI.-INDUSTRlAL PARK. The east-west right-of-wav shall be that purl of the Brimhall Triangle lying within 150 feet of the south right-of-way lirie of U.S. Trunk Highway 12 as shown on the plat of LONG LAKE COMi\fERCL\L-INI)US 1 Rl.AL P.ARK V^ithin the north-souA right-of-way, the City’.s easement shall be tor a public road and public utilities. A'ithin the east-west right-of-way, c,\eept its intersection with ihc north-south right-of-way, the City’s easement shall be for public utilities only. See the sketch of Option 1 attached as Exhibit E. e. Otten hereby grants to Developer a perpetual, nonexclusive easement tltrough the Brimhall Triangle for a private road and private utilities. The easement shall become effective if and when Otten acquires fee simple title to the Drimhall Triangle free of the State ol Minnesota s highway easement. The easement area is the 70-foot vvidc right-of-way described in the preceding subparagraph and that portion of the Bnmhall Triangle lying easterly of that 70-foot wide right-of-way. See the sketch of Option 1 attached as Exhibit E. f Within four months after the Option 1 easements become effective, Developer shall build its private road as shown on Exhibit B at Developer ’s c.xpcnsc and the City of Orono shall vacate the 10-foot wide utility and drainage casement along the south line oflhe Otten Parcel. 3. Option 2 — Turnback of Brimhall Triangle. If Otten does not acquire fee simple title to the Brimhall Triangle by Mard(^ 1999. or if MnDoT docs not approve reconveyance of the Brimhall Triangle to Otten by 1999,\hen permanent access between the Service 800 Parcel and Wayzata Boulevard shall b^tticquired as follows: ^ _ ' \ I a. The City of Orono shall apply to MnDoT for a permit to install a public lOiid in the Brimhall Triangle as shown on Exhibit C. Developer shall provide all plans and specifications required by MnDoT at Developer ’s e.xpense. The plans and specificdlions shall be revised as necessary to meet any reasonable de. iands by MnDoT. such as extension of the public road to reach the Otten Parcel as well as the Serv'ice 800 Pared. b. Within four months after MnDoT issues the public road permit. Developer shall install the public road at Developer ’s expense and shall dedicate it to the City of Orono. The City of Orono shall accept the dedication, if the road complies with the requirements of this Road Agreement and the requirements of MnDoT. The designation otThe road as public and the acceptance of the dedication of the road shall not change the maintenance and repair obligations set forth in paragraph 6 below. c.Promptly after the public road has been built and dedicated to the City of Orono. it shall apply to MnDoT for **tumback ” of the Brimhall Triatigic, in other words, assignment of the State of Minnesota ’s highway easement over the Brimhall Triangle to the City ofOrono. d. 'fhe parties are aware that, while MnDoT has authority to “tum back ” the highw ay casement to the City of Orono, MnDoT would prefer to ’‘turn hack ” the highway easement n«?j:9,04 3 FROM LEONARD. STREET AND DEINARD V/ED) S. Sl'99 14:24-ST. 14:22. NO. 42604SSS05 P 2 LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD fko^lssional association c March 31,1999 Hush M. Ma)nrard "612-335-19S1 hmm 1562{fi lconard.com Bv Tvhiumi^.r Michael Gaffron City of Orono 2750 Kalley Parkway Ororo,MN 55323 Re: Brinihall Triangle; Our File 15251 -1 Dear Mike: T am very pleased to report that the three heirs of Franc P. Daniels, Sr. have conveyed their fee simple interests in the Brimhall Triangle to Mr. & Mrs. ClitYOtten. Copies of the tliree deeds aie enclosed. I received one deed on Monday and uvo deeds today. I plan to record thciii tomonoNN. I realize tliat tlie Road Agreement required Cliff Onen to acquire fee simple title to the Brirnluill Triangle by March 15th or else Option 2 would be intplenienied. Mr. & ^Irs. Otten and Jeiui Mork Brcdcson would very much prefer to proceed with Option 1, even though Cliff mic.sed the March 15th deadline. We request that the City of Orono waive that deadline and allow Option 1 to proceed. Option 1 (icconveyancc of the Brimhall Triangle to Otten) should be easier to implement than Option 2 (ttirnback of the Brunliall Triangle to die City of Long Lake and assignment to the City of Orono), because it is more straight-foiward and does not involve the City of Long Lake. \Vc hope the City of Orono will cooperate by granting this waiver. V'ery truly yours, LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD Hugit M. Maynard cc w/encl;Stephen R. Pflaum, Usq. Cliff Otten Jean Mork Sredesoii Thomas Barrett, Esq. 150 South fifiM 5tpiit Minnesota >5402 T^k f • t LAW OfMCIS IN MlNNl iirOLM, ^AlHT fAUL AND MANKAIU FRQM.i.EpNARP. STREET AND DEIKAF.D S. 3: ■ QQ 14:24-gT. 14:22 NO. 4250433305 ? No delinquent taxes and transffer entered; Ccrtificnie of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. _____________ (T>Mte) County Auditor Deputy DEED TAX DUE; $ 1.70 Date: A/^ve/. . 1999 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION. Franc P. Daiiieb, Jr. aiid Janet Lucil’e Danicb, huaband ond wife Granlors, hereby convey and quitclaim to Clifford L. Ottcui and l.oube Wakefield Otten. Grantees, real property m Hennepin County. Minnesota, described as follows: Outlet It Long Lake Commercial-Industrial Park, accuidin^ to the recorded pl«* thereof, together wiUi all licreditamcnts and appurtenances. This Deed conveys aAcr-acqulred title. Grantor covenants and represents tlvat Grantor has not dona or suffered anything to enctimber the property EXCEPT: None. Check box if applicable pg The Seller certifies that the seller does not know of any wells on the described real property, n A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document. ^ i. n I am fer.iiUar with tho property described in this instrument and 1 certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well riisr.ln.sure certificate. The total consideration for this transfer of property is SSOO or less. A£E.x Deed Stamp Here STATE OF At/n fLeJ^O hx . COUbri*Y OF r>U } This instrument was acknowledged before mo on Daniels, husband and tvife. Grantors. NOT/UUAl. STAMT OR 8BAI . (OR oV hf.R TITIJ; OR RAMK> 1-1 SAM HLAVAC :;0TAnv PUBLIC ftfracsUTA M«i4>ivn.ui0dUp*«sJtn li sogo ........................... INSTRUMENT WAS DP-AFiTEb bV (NAME ANT* Leonard. Streot and Dciiwd (NLW/HIvIM) 130 South Fifth StreoL Suite 2300 Minneapolis. MN 53402 1999 by Franc P. Daniels, Jr. and Janet LucHlc n-i I'H'jrioNAfufeE or NOTARY rUDUC o^ON a TURE or NOTARY rUDUC OR OTHER OtFlClAL Chcck licic if part or all of th« land ia Rcgisccrod (Torrcfia) □ Tak RiAfattvtnu for lha raU property dfismbCvS ta thil Iftftrumart liwutd be ho<t lu (b^Iud# lha fum< and addrtw of Grantee): cnirura l. oiicn Louise Wakefield Otten 2236 Lake Shore Drive South Independence, MN 55359 .01 FROM LEONARD. STREET AND DEINARD InctviduaK*) to indMduai(s) No iiH'nqv™* Uxe» and transfer enfered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) fil®d ( ) no* required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. -------. ■■ — (WED) 3. Sr 99 14:25''ST. 14;22.''N0. 4260433S05 P ’ 4 CDote) County Auditor Deputy (reserved for recording data) DEED TAX DUE: g 1.79 Date: March 26_____, 1999 Hennepin County. Minnesota, desenbed as foUews: OuUot 1. Long Lake Commercial-Industrial Park, according to the recorded pUt thereof. together with all hereditaments and appurtenarices. TW. D«a convey. .ft«.Mqui«d «le. Onuitnr covennnl. and repcesenls Uat <3r««oc has no. done or sufTcred anjnhing u, encumber the property EXCEPT: None. the sellar doaa not know of any wells on the described real property. R ^j;:^.ns.'“«^p^sr2ssrd£'sssu«andiceni^^ The total consideration for this transfer of property U $500 or less. Affix Deed Stamp Here David H. Cochran Helen D. Cochran, a/k/a Nel Cochran STATE OF Mlnn^ao^t^ COUNTY OF Hennepin > S3. This instrument wna ackncrwledged before me on aAc/a Ncl Cocluan, husband and wife. Grantors. , 1999 by David H. Cochran and Helen D. Coch^ V0T/K»!*« - «taUK’6r SEAl. <OR OTHBR TTTUg OR KANK) JCRR6 A. MtUEft HOtAMy PVMse sniseiefiOTw MT COMMISSION EXPIRES IANUARV $1 'JOOO THIS INSTRUMENT W/VS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS}. Leonard, Street and Delruid (NLW/HMM) 130 South Filth Street, Suite 2300 Minneapolis, MN 33402 C OR OTHEK orriClAL Check heo if part or «U of ttto I«nd i» Renineied (Toircas) D T.SS Stnid«sce» for ih. f**l P«f-«vb« MOI to C^acKia* lb« BAD* miidrmB of OrASCo*}. CUITurdL Often Louise Wakefield Otten 2236 I.akc Shore Drive South Independence, MN 5S3S9 17f«54C 01 FROM LEONARD. STREET AND DEINARDIhtfvMuaK*) to indMdiaK*) (V/ZD No dalinqueot taxM ftnd tnasfn entered; CeniScaifi of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ___________ County Auditor Deputy DEED TAX DUE: S l.Tfl Date: ri\McV> ^X> 1999 3. 51'99 14:23--'ST. 14:22-'NO. 4260433305 P 5 (ce*«r»ed for reecrdtna dl>u> FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, John A. Bilhnan and Katherina F. Billraan, a/lc/a Kit Billinan. husband wife. Grantors, hereby conv^ and quitclaim to Clifford L. Often and Louise Wakefield Often. Grantees, real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Outlot 1, Long Lake Commerdal-Industrial Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, together with all hercditanMUts and i^puitenanoes This Deed conveys aftcr*acqutred title. Grantor covenants and r^reeents that Grantor has not done or suffered anything to encumber the property EXCEPT; None. Check box if applicable pg Tim /wtifioa that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. O A well disclosure certificate aooampanies this document. Q I am fiunlllar with the property described in this iusUumeal and 1 certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. The total consideration for this transfer Of property is SSOO or less. ^bhn A. BUlman A£Ex Deed Stamp Hens Katherine F. BUlman, a/k/a Kh Billman STATE OF IriAi riv- COUNTY OF SawK > ss. This ifistnimcnt was acknowlodgod before me on a/k/a Kit Billznano husband aad wife» Grantors# Ou\ cJU f a 1999 by John A. Billman and Katherino F. Btitman, NOTARIAL STAMF 6R ^itALc^R Uinea Lk OR RANK) ( KATHY P CUNNINOIIAM I ,J^rNOTAl>y W« p.r\ V K>7 SlOWATUiUK 9<F NOTARY PUBUC OR OTHER OFnClAt VVi^/ f, O 4 V-- Check here if part or sll of the Isnd it Registered CTonrent) Q THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRATTED BY (NAMR AND Leonard, Street and Dcinard (NLW/HMM) 150 South Fifth Stroei, Suite 2300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 T*3« StMimtomftM for tho ro^l property dooe-ibod in thi# Inolrumcfil fhcwld bo Mac to (ladudo tbo iwbo ond oddroM of OrviCoo}: Clifford L. Often Louiae WakeReld Otten 2236 Lake Shore Drive South Independcncti MN 55359 ITtilTl.Ol LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION April 1, 1999 By Messettper :i2c:i:vF.D APR 0 5 1999 Cl I 'l Or CnO.VO Hugh M. Maynard 612-335-1562 hmm 1562@leonard.com Mr. Keith Slater Right of Way Section Minnesota Department of Transportation 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113-3174 Re: “Brimhall Triangle” Along Trunk Highway 12 in Long Lake; Our File 15251-1 Dear Mr. Slater: Our clients Mr. and Mrs. Clifford L. Otten are the fee simple owners of Outlot 1, LONG LAKE COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The entire parcel is covered by an unrecorded Highway Easement in favor of the State of Minnesota dated July 15, 1927; but only a portion of the parcel is occupied by the pavement and other improvements of Trunk Highway 12. On behalf of our clients, we respectfully request that the State of Minnesota reconvey to them the surplus highway land, which is legally described as follows: That part of Outlot 1, LONG LAKE COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRJA.L PARK, lying northeasterly of a straight line running through Minnesota Department of T’"tnsportation Right-Of-Way Monuments B8 and B5229. Said monument B8 is on the north line of said Outlot 1 and 230.60 feet west of the northeast comer of said Outlot 1, as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 27-57. Said monument B5229 is on the east line of said Outlot 1 and 83.24 feet south of the northeast comer of said Outlot 1, as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 27- Enclosed are copies of the deeds into Mr. and Mrs. Otten and a sketch of the parcel to be reconveyed. James Kirchner of your office is very familiar with this property. If you or he have any questions, please call me. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD Hugh M. Maynard Real Property Law Specialist Certified by the Minnesota State Bar Association i$o South FifTH SiBtir Suite i)oo Minneapolis , Minnesota 55401 Tii 6ii.)}5.ijoo Fax 6ti-335-i657 LAW OFFICES IN MINNEAPOLIS, SAINT PAUL AND MANKATO April 1,1999 Page 2 bcc; Mr. Clifford Otten (Often Bros. Nursery & Landscaping) Ms. Jean Mork Bredeson (Service 800, Inc.) i*'''Mr. Mike GafGron (City of Orono) Stephen R. Pflaum, Esq. >' ■1 \ Date of Application: 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60 day limit: 4/17/99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING APR 1 2 I9yy DATE: ITEM NO,// Department App? oval: Name Liz Van Zomeren Title City Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2471 Independent Orono School District #278 High School Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Application: The School District is requesting a amendment to the conditional use permit for the high school to make improvements to the parking and circulation plan by adding a student parking lot, adding a bus corral and stormwater management pond, and changing the driveway curb cuts. A variance is required to locate the parking lot in the front yard 40' from the property line where 50' is required. A land alteration permit is also required to grade the site for the new parking area and the pond. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommended approval. Parking The approval resolution references the Zoning Code's requirement for parking stall size for each type of space to be provided. The parking lot will need to be striped to meet this requirement. The grade of the parking area is to be 4%. The Public Services Director and City's landscape architect consultant recommend 4% Large paved areas that are have greater slopes become icy in the winter time and can also increase the speed of stormwater runoff. ft247! Orono High School Variance, CUP, and CUP amendment April 12. 1999 page-1 Date of Application; 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60 day limit: 4/17/99 Parking Lot Lighting: The City Council needs to review the lighting plan and discuss the allowed height for the lighting standards, the cutoff angle and the amount of illumination measured in footcandles. Glare and light trespass are to be minimized and no uplight shall be produced. The applicant needs to provide a lighting plan that complies with the City's Council direction. Walkway Lighting The applicant has provided a lighting plan to illuminate the pedestrian paths around the bus staging area and the east side of the school and the drop-off area. The height of the light standard and the allowed cut-off angle and footcandles need to be discussed by the City Council and further clarified on the lighting plan. Landscaping Plan The City's landscape architect, Wally Case of DSU, has reviewed the landscaping plan. His recommendations are incorporated in the approval resolution with the areas to be landscaped and the type and quantity of trees identified. He also recommends plantings in parking islands to reduce the visual impact of the parking areas. The applicant shall provide a Master Landscape Plan for the school campus with a planting schedule that can be phased over several years. The landscape plan should provide both overstory and understory trees that have a variety of colors to provide seasonal interest. The landscaping plan should visually connect the schools building and campus. Pedestrian Traffic The City Engineer and Public Services Director recommend that pedestrian traffic be limited to the south driveway curb cut access point for best visibility and safety concerns. The approval resolution for the new middle school addresses the City's interest in installing a traffic signal. Stormwater Management The plan indicates construction of a stormwater management pond to the north of the parking lot between the high school and the ice arena. The pond plan will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the MCWD. §2471 Orono High School Variance. CUP. and CUP amendment April 12. J999 page-2 Date of Application: 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60 day limit: 4/17/99 Easements Drainage and Conservation Easements The applicant shall provide easements over all drainage areas, wetlands, and the stormwater pond. The applicant must also obtain the required approvals and permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Letter of Credit The City Engineer has recommended a letter of credit at 150% for the site improvements. The City Council will need to discuss this with the applicant, as it may have not been programmed by the School District. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: To approve the application, subject to incorporation of the recommendations of staffs memo and further subject to review and approval of a lighting plan, landscaping plan, parking and circulation, and allowed height. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED*. To amend or adopt the enclosed resolution to approve the requested variance, conditional use permit and conditional use permit amendment. Attachments 02471 Orono High School Variance, CUP, and CUP amendment April 12, 1999 page-S A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISIONS 3 AND 5, AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR LAND ALTERATION, SECTION 10.03, SUBD. 19-21 FILE NO. 2471 WHEREAS, Orono Independent School District #278 (hereinafter the "applicant") is owner of the property located at 795 Old Crystal Bay Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A attached, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 15, 1999, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance and a conditional use permit amendment to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivisions 3 and 5 to permit improvements to the existing parking lot by adding a bus staging area and student parking area with 88 spaces to be located 40’ from the front property line where 50 ’ is required. The improvements require a conditional use permit amendment to change the high school campus. The construction of a stormwater management pond north of the parking lot improvements requires a conditional use permit for land alteration. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1.This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2471, along with the proposed Middle School at 800 Old Crystal Bay Road. 2.The property is located in the RR-IB Zoning District where 2 acres is the minimum lot area. Page 1 of 7 3.The Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 15, 1999 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: 5. C. A. The proposed improvements to the parking lot will increase the amount of parking for students and provide a safer ingress and egress for buses and vehicular traffic by separating the buses from the passenger vehicles and by changing the driveway curb cuts to be perpendicular to Old Crystal Bay Road. B. The reduced setback, from 50’ to 40 ’ will not detract from the surrounding area, the school campus, or interfere with safe travel on Old Crystal Bay Road. The large amounts of parking area will require landscaping to reduce their visual impact. Pedestrian circulation shall be controlled and crossing points limited to minimize vehicular conflicts and reduce turf maintenance in the island. D. Construction of the stormwater management pond north of the parking area and the grading for the paved areas require a land alteration permit. The amount of land to be moved, graded or fill is___________cubic yards. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) has jurisdiction over the wetland areas and will review and approve the grading and drainage plan. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessarv’ to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 7 6.The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit amendment to permit changes to the existing parking lot by adding a bus staging area and student parking area will not be detrimental to the health, safety or geneial welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a front yard setback variance, a conditional use permit amendment for changes to the high school campus and a conditional use permit for land alteration per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivisions 3 and 5, and Section 10.03, Subd. 19-21, to permit construction of a student parking lot and circulation plan improvements as shown on the plans prepared by Wold Architects, dated _________most revised date _____________. Approval w'as subject to the following conditions; 1.The parking area shall be landscaped in accordance with a Master Landscape Plan for the school campus to reduce their visual impact. The applicant shall provide a Master Landscape Plan that includes the following: A.Planting fourteen (14) new (2 and 1/2 inch caliper) shade trees and machine moving ten (10) (6 to 8 inch) ash trees to locations between the new parking lots and the High School. The shade trees are to be spaced 40’ to 50’ apart. The existing landscaping in the boulevards and around the school will remain. B. C. The site removal plan indicates relocating approximately eighteen (18) deciduous and evergreen trees (4-10 inches). The applicant will make every effort to relocate the existing 10-16 inch ash trees east of the existing parking lot. fhe plan shall include planting additional trees along the west side of the new front walk, the new^ islands east of the gymnasium, along the walk north of the new event parking lot and around the new drainage pond. Page 3 of 7 D. Additional shade trees should be planted 50’ apart along the west side of the new walk, in the pedestrian and parking islands, and along the north side of the event lot. Groupings of evergreen trees should also be planted in the area to the northwest and west of the event lot, and a few groups or clusters of overstory and understory trees should be located around the new drainage basin. The Master Landscape Plan shall include trees with good fall color and good winter interest. The plan shall clarify the areas to be seeded and sodded. 2.The applicant shall provide a lighting plan. The lighting plan shall identify the number and type of lighting fixtures not to exceed___in height and_____in footcandles. The cutoff angle of the light shall be Glare and light trespass shall be prohibited. No uplight shall be produced. The parking lot light standards in the interior of the parking lot shall be located in landscaped parking islands. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The applicant shall provide a final parking lot design plan that identifies handicap access across the island and the placement of accessible ramps. The maximum slope of the parking lot shall not exceed 4%. The City Engineer shall review' and approve the final plans. The applicant shall provide drainage easements across the stormwater management plan. The applicant shall obtain a land alteration permit from the City and all applicable permits from the MCWD. The applicant shall ensure that erosion control will be provided wherever needed until the vegetative cover in the disturbed areas has been fully and finally restored. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit w'ithin one year of the date of Council’s approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (April 12, 2000). Page 4 of 7 8. 9. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of April, 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, befo-5 me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. On this day of , 199 ___, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed tbe same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 6 of 7 #2471 Staff Report to Planning Commission March 15,1999 Conditional Use Permit Amendment & Variance for Front Yard Setback from 50* to 40* for parking lot Orono High School 795 Old Crystal Bay Road TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: RE: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator #2471 Orono Independent School District #278 795 Old Crystal Bay Road (High School)) Conditional Use Permit Amendment-Public Hearing EXHIBITS: See Plan Sheets (C1.1,1.2, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8) Lighting Plan-unnumbered Zoning:RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Ins'iitutional/Urban Service AreaComprehensive Plan: Application: The Orono Independent School District #278 is proposing to make improvements to the student and faculty parking lots for the high school. The school district also proposes designating a bus corral area and circulation plan that works together with the bus parking area for the new middle school. The proposed parking improvements encroach into the required 50' front yard setback from Old Crystal Bay Road. A variance and conditional u.se permit amendment will be required for the proposed circulation plan and parking lot improvements. PARCEL INFORMATION Property Identiflcation Numbers: (High School) 33-118-23-21 0001 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the North 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota ik2il\ Orono High School Condi I tonal Use Permit Amendment March 15. 1999 pagt-l ZONING Maiirauin Zoning Requirements Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Street 2 acres, dry buildable 200’50’50'30’50’ The proposed circulation plan and parking areas do not meet the required 50' setback from the right of way for Old Crystal Bay Road. The student parking lot (94 spaces) at the south end of the submitted plan indicates that the paved parking area will be located approximately 28 ’ from the right- of-way. The parking lot with 88 spaces in fron^ of the building is proposed to be located approximately 40' from the right-of-way. A variance is required to allow the parking areas to encroach in the required yards. Zoning Requirements for Schools The RR-IB district is intended to provide an area for low density residential development and limited agricultural uses. Schools are allowed in this district as a conditional use. The Zoning Code requires that no building or parking area be located within a required yard. The Zoning Code requires that each parking space be dimensioned at 9’ x 20’ with handicapped spaces typically larger. The parking surface is to be paved with curbing. Lighting The Zoning Code requires that parking areas are prohibited from having a direct source of light visible from the right-of-way or adjacent land. The school district has provided a lighting plan for the parking area that indicates the location of light poles 35’ in height with .5 and 1. footcandle line measurements. The lighting plan is under review by the City's landscape architect. At the City Council’s work session, the Council suggested that the lighting standards be similar to the 12 ’ light standards in the City Hall parking lot. Landscaping The Zoning Code requires a landscaping plan with planting schedule. A landscaping plan has been provided and is under review by the City's consultant landscape architect. His comments will be provided at the Planning Commission meeting, or earlier. it2471 Orono High School Conditional Use Permit Amendment March IS, 1999 pag€~2 ACCESS TV? r.lin proposes to realign the curb cuts for the bus corral area and the parking lot in front of the high school. One driveway curb cut that provides access to the student parking area will be closed. The driveway openings will be improved to provide a perpendicular access to the street instead of the angled access currently provided. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS The Planning Commission may recommend approval of a conditional use permit amendment if the application meets the following standards: 1. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and the Comprehensive Municipal Plan; 2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the puolic health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION This application was noticed only as a conditional use permit and not a variance. The variance portion of the application needs to be properly noticed for public hearing. M247J Orono High School Conditional Use Permit Amendment March IS. 1999 page-3 nfiOIK?S afio ! I \h I • 5-ri I :-•«. ?5 iiir :rt: it;| -•I‘i ^»ir its* r!j .llns •i Hlin lK'!i itr :«!»*i;i p:} izt hi \m in ifk*** ?i-^ • 32! 3i ‘ Wl Hl-i Ti« s:t Ik?; -•‘f-r k2::Jr3 yd ?i5 rf-? :i§ nni- i* _ S _ «» •iH il.V:ja lU'i’ifc ->lK U! iK:lir . ...If* :t!j 2 ill -I". !i-ii i|5.!r 5.-MSijif*. ?s*:it I-:: Hslii *,i| '•?T !'hj'ntJni ist-i hn III! ?5jl ‘Biillil!i rn jllirii *i: mt • —is : 6 I !»! 8 ihrJ i Ig I s “ u 11 I iHliiiiini *• .<8S ('I J J J i gM !! ! !l 4 1! 1! iI ■i @1 ■ PI 11 HI III III III JL.. H IGfl SC+IOOL AMevcKT CHAMiie^ if 35g I I I I If III mil TJ o o r#i B M I 7A^i /;» r:------1 f • *r i i // (»\ ,<■ /' / •-f - .-.ff* yii z fi Q. 3 O < O o lU X 8 e D g X 0)z Ki 111\M V. « 1 k I i 1 ' ^ 1 B k 1 IS! k \ ! k 1 1 ! S«i i 1 1 ! !»! i 1 I S» h |g < • • k k • • k h 1 i »k *!! u 1 \\If IIIIIIf 1n ii u •1 *i If f n )i n nn ‘i fi m i ^ M 8 8 * a 8 8 m m 1 8 8 1 z * 8 8 : *B 8 1 li i i !I I I il Is :lil,,i IIIIII J« ' '*lit ic • • ■j*A6^ 7uAJp6AQ i*Ail , ^ lUkWIQHBSHBSBBS ' ' W. (M Application Date: Deadline: 1/8/99 5/10/99 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING APR 1 2 1999 CITY OF OtiUNO DATE: 3/29/99 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2451 Lyle and Gretchen Shaw 1750 Shadywood Road Variances—Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 Acre) Lot Area:10,430 square feet (.30 acre) Application: The applicants have applied for variances to permit the addition of a garage and living space to the existing residence. The proposal would require variances from allowed hardcover in the 75-?‘'0’ setback from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of Lake Minnetonka, and to permit raising the roof of the existing house. Presently, the house is a 1 1/2 story structure that, as proposed, would be expanded to a full 2 story house. Overall height of the residence would be increased 6 1/2' within the Average Lalceshore Setback and 0-75' lakeshore setback. Staff is requesting prior to issuing a building permit, the applicants provide a drdnage plan that is acceptable to City Staff showing the proposed development will not pose a risk to the Shaw's or adjacent property owners. This application requires the following variances: 1.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)t2); To allow 2,406.64 s.f. (51.14%) of hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback, where 719.45 s.f. (15.3%) exists and 1,169.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed, and to allow a revised building plan within the 0-75' lakeshore setback. 2.Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the aver, .ge distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lo*s. I PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission / ^commended by a 5 to 0 vote to: Approve the proposed development to permit a residential and garage addition to the residence, and to raise the roofline of the existing structure to allow a full second story within the 75' lakeshore setback, and ahead of the Average Lakeshore Setback. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: StafT recommends approval of the applicantion. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IC (1/2 acre) Lot Area 1\ Lot Width Lakeside Yard Side Yard Street Yard Required 21,780 s.f.100'75'10'30' Proposed 10,430 s.f.61.55'75'11'57' Hardcover Distance front Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0-75'5,752 s.f.517.25 s.f. (8.9%) none (0%) 517.25 s.f (8.9%) To permit a change to the building envelope. 75-250'4,678 s.f.719.45 s.f. (15.3%) 1,169.5 s.f. (25%) 2,406.64 s.f (51.14%) To permit an addition of hardcover 250-500'0 0 0 (30%) 0 none 500-1000'0 0 0 (35%) 0 none 0-75* Lakeshore Setback The existing residence is located 55' from the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. The attached deck is 48' from the lakeshore. The total hardcover closer than 75' from the lake would not be increased by the proposed plan. 75-250' Lakeshore Setback The existing hardcover would increase by 1,687.19 s.f The property could add 450 s.f. of hardcover in the setback without requiring any variances. The proposal would raise the hardcover to 51.14% where 25% is allowed. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 10,430 s.f.Existing: 888.7 s.f Proposed: 1,444.02 s.f. 8.5% 13.8% The deck located on the lakeside of the house is not sunounded by a fence, nor does it exceed 6' above grade, therefore it is not considered structure. ANALYSIS Variance STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant has included his statement of hardship as Exhibit B. The applicant should also be asked for his testimony regarding this issue. Issues 1.The existing lot does not contain a garage. The proposal would provide the applicants a 36' by 24' attached two-car garage. 2. 3. The proposal would meet all yard requirements. Hardcover would increase to 51.14% in the 75-250' lakeshore setback. Not included in the setback is 517.25 s.f. of hardcover that would remain in the 0-75' lakeshore setback. Existing on the property is 15.3% hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback. 4.A 5' by 5' storage shed that exists on the street property line would be removed should the development be approved. Should the City Council approve the application, staff lecommends the applicant provide a drainage plan that would be acceptable by City Staff to show the proposed development would not pose a risk to the subject property or adjacent properties. This being completed prior to the issuance of a building permit. J Attachments A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Application Description of Request and Statement of Hardship Revised Site Plan/Survey Lakeside Elevations North Elevation South Elevation Main Floor Plan Second Floor Plan Hardcover Worksheets Plat Map Location Map Site Topography Property Owners List Permit Record r CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 249-4600 TO: Lyle and Gretchen Shaw 1750 Shadywood Road Wayzata MN 55391 APPLICATION NO. #2451 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: March 24,1999 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance COPIES:Jerry Roelofs Roelofs Remodeling & Renovation 11900 Wayzata Blvd #212 Minnetonka MN 55305 DATE OF MEETING; 03/22/99 VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2; SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (1); SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (2); AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C) (6) FILE #2451 WHEREAS, Lyle Shaw and Gretchen Shaw (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 1750 Shadywood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 16, Shadywood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due and published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on January 19, 1999 and March 15, 1999, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit expansion of the building envelope for a 2nd story addition within the 0-75' lakeshore setback where one-half story exists; Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to permit 2,406.64 s.f. (51.14%) of hardcover within the 75-250' lakeshore setback, where 719.45 s.f. (15.3%) of hardcover exists and 1,169.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed; and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6) to permit an encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. Page 1 of 5 Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, 1. 2. 3. 5. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2451. The property is located in the LR-IC, Zoning District, where 1/2 acre or 21,780 sq. ft. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of .30 acre or 10,430 sq. ft. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 15, 1999, and recommended approval on a vote of 5 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The existing residence is located 55' from the 929.4' Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of Lake Minnetonka, and is 1 1/2 stories in height. The upper 1/2 story would be raised 6 1/2' to a full story. B. No garage space exists on the property. C. A 5' X 5' storage shed is located on the property line, and shall be removed at the time the addition is constructed. D. The structure would not exceed 15% on the lot. E. All additional hardcover would be placed outside of the 75' setback. F.The deck existing on the lakeside of the residence is non-conforming. Any future replacement of the deck would require Planning Commission and City Council approval. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely Page 2 of 5 serve as a convenience to tlie applicants,, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit the expansion of the building envelope for a 2nd story addition within the 0-75' lakeshore setback where one-half story exists; Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to permit 2,406.64 s.f. (51.14%) of hardcover within the 75-250' lakeshore setback, where 719.45 s.f. (15.3%) of hardcover exists and 1,169.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed; and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6) to permit an encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1.Variance approval is for conditions shown on the survey completed by Coffin and Gronberg, Inc., dated 7/5/96, on file with the City of Orono Building and Zoning Department. Any alteration to structure or hardcover, including reductions, may require further City Council and Planning Commission approval. 2.The 5' X 5' shed located on the front property line, on the southwest comer of the lot shall be removed prior final inspection. 3.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (April 12, 2000). Page 3 of 5 1 4.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors aiid assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The loregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of April, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of.199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) On this day of 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. I NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 A # Application # ’3-^S‘L Date Received /^/lu/^g ' ■ Amount Paid. 2.s-Qg^ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE '^PLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00... .* • » • (no change from original application) ^ Variance for non-conforming structures' $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION ^ Site Address >^/i/iCVu->c>cO • • • • ^ *, I Property Identification Number (PJ.D.).i'7'^/O -Zf Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired____ I (do) ^ n^ abo own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property; xx residential o ther (specify). Zoning District:.__________________________________ y-.(monthtyear) APPLICANT Phone (horned ^/z,93f‘,yys'? Name Phone (work ) Cf?L ..svz Address: 'A.u.i City; ______Zip: OWNER (if different than ^licant) <^.gTr-/*oo) OiT3+cJ>Name Address: /75P ^^-.40 Phone (home") . V>/ __ Phone (work ) 4/Z .93y> City: __________Zip: 3S^ ( *jpss3a \ 3 ' DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost Describe request in detail: Stz. _____________________________ SB (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIREI) Lot Area Lot Width Setback:Front Xt Hardcover Lot Coverage Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHlP/DESCRIPTiON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Ssi ]_______‘ (attach additional sheets if necessary) December 16, 1998 ROELOFS REMODELING & RENOVATION B REQUEST FOR VARIANCE 1750 SHADYWOOD ROAD SITE CONDITION: The subject property is a small lot (less than 'A acre) on the West shore of Crystal Bay. The site is generally flat though located on a modest ridge. The main yard rises approximately 6 feet above the street, continues flat and then falls uniformly to the lake (28% slope). The site is not heavily wooded but mature trees and some bushes exist. The existing house is small (746 SF). It contains a small Bedroom, Kitchen, Living Room and a Bath. Winding stairways approximately 30” wide provide access to a finished expansion space beneath the roof (100 SF over T tall) and to the fiill basement found under approximately 2/3 of the building. The house built sometime in the 20’s or 30’s is in generally good condition. No Garage is located on the property. A 5 x 5 storage shed encroaches on the county right of way. REQUEST: The request for variance comes in two parts. The first is acceptance of the existing conditions. The existing house lies too close to the shoreline and too close to the North property line. The house was built long before the setbacks were established. The second part of the request is for a variance for hardcover to construct an addition to provide a two-car attached Garage and an asphalt driveway with turnaround. Construction is contemplated on top of the Garage to expand the house at some point in the future but when is a function of budget, timing and such. Plans submitted present a comprehensive design solution and “wish list.” The Garage building is a basement garage type requiring some cutting of soil to provide access and some likely retaining of dirt. Specifics are as yet unclear. The Garage, though lower in elevation, is designed to borrow approximately 4 ’ from the existing basement to perform at a nominal width of 22 ’ (24 ’ less two 12 ” block walls) while maintaining the required sideyard setback tt the South. The depth of the Garage, nominally 36 ’ is designed to provide adequate but not generous storage at the front of the Garage for lawnmowers, snow blow ers and the like and to provide space for a legal and acceptable stairway between the main floor and the lower level and Garage. The proposed driveway would be minimal in width, slightly wider than the garage doors, tapering quickly to one car width. The turnaround would allow for nose first entry to Co. Rd. 19. The variance required would be for hardcover totaling 51.1% in the 75 to 250 zone. No greater encroac'iiment toward the water is needed. No expansion of the portion of the existing house that is within the 0 to 75’ zone is requested or contemplated. S'T 1^' ■ r .. ' f f ^\ r ■ I 11900 \XAYZATABOLlE\ARD • SnTE212 • MINNETONK.V NLN 55.^05 Fiix:6l2-5I2 0469 * Pbone: 612-512 0110 lxr^\o ! RO EL O F S REMODELING & RENOVATION Variance Request -1750 Shadywood Road Page Two The hardship is that of many of the properties in and around Lake Minnetonka. The lot is small and the restrictions and zoning adopted long after the house was built make it very difficult to bring the house to any contemporary standards that align with the market values. A two-car attached Garage with an asphalt driveway is a fairly basic expectation. We hope that after thoughtful consideration you agree. Sincerely, Gerald L. Roelofs CR ROELOFS REMODELING & RENOVATION, INC. License No. 1095 11900WAYZ.\TABOL1EVARD • SLTTE212 • MLNXETONK.A. .M.\'55305 Fax 612-512-0469 * Phone: 6I2-5I2-01I0 ■ i^ V 1 J Vv.:;;-. - J L<e«»»No ICTS • ID U1 LJ 2 UJ q:□l u.o Q- q:oc/i LiJ Q <ou c:fl D Q d K < o 0^ r' o) •s till/) \ = \ ML .SaBMM lli #■ • w--^..I' \i 11 1• f 1• 1 -------u—^ • -------i —i 0 i V“- 'ii - •' 1 «wi •;/ •'a» ■i .* •. f:a‘niJ •i'. k------ ___tJ F Q O P a VM oin 3 € o fj L, J 0 <i I livn V)r- 5 I! im vAT*ih I; c3 j 9 c 3 k 1, 6 . \n J 8 u. Ozoo liJ CO \ • V hardcover calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) ( 0-75'75-250'250-500'500-1000' EXISTING HARDCnVER IN 7.HW. - A. House r V X X X width •• ' S.F. ^99 S.F. ; *•S.F. S.F. B. Garage C. Driveway S.F. X X S.F. S.F. D. Sidewalk X ■X S.F. S.F. E. Patio/Deck Z- X X y'lT S.F. IB.20. O S.F. F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPER rV AREA IN ZONE S7>^r -r B X 100 5».^!r S.F. t S.F. ^9 % PROPOSED HARDTOVER TN ZONK A. House Length (• Z-Z^/^yy S.F. X X Width 20-r 3^9'?^ S.F. __________S.F. S.F. B. Qm%t C. Driveway S.F. X X S.F. S.F. D. Sidewalk X X S.F. S.F. E. Patio/Deck X X 5“ <2o o S.F. S.F. F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE -► B Sr‘>sz. S‘0.i9~ S.F. X 100 5“>yz " S.F. r.9 % % B '1^ L^i- t:y 4 • > 7 3 i C'•» j : 'I f‘-1 ? A B HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN rnvE -.-^. A. House * •• / \ Leoith , 0 250-500*500-1000* B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Pado/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic O. Other Width . X X s' X X X ■X I X X X X X ^4. S TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERFY AREA IN ZONE *?/*» + B 94 X 100 - PROPOSED HARnCOVER IN ZONE A. House ZO‘< Lcqgih '^4.e> B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X Width X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE X 100 •• f SJ'. s.F. __________S.F. •__S.F. 3ZV.O 2V ZC S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.•• S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. V9. yr* s.F. ’>/*’ S.F. zss % Y-r s.F. S.F. _______S.F. fto. ax S.F. o S.F. //4Z. VV S.F. ___ S.F. ?0. 9 3 s.F. 94 yr s.F. ■5V. /y X A B rS • «.;i r . A »4W ^\y 1 ^ .9 **9 a.,w S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. B M • lUss &e UJ a s § lO ii>m ISs 1 / V' V - • • • ' CI^S^ K H H <• > os si *-is H H) }i I 1 i ' Permit Wo. PERMIT RECORD Date 6-9-69 yg3J 6-/7-77 / ~y^ lOjd^iA^coc:/ / N • • Type of Permit H60t<oP Uj~ Hodt^o^ COUNCIL MEETING Application Date: 2/9/99 Completion Date: 2/9/99 60 Day Deadline (Extended To): 6/7/99 APR 1 2 1999 Cljy OF OHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 4/9/99 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2461 Chris Pierson on behalf of Bryson/Johnson 650-660-670-680 Big Island Lot Line Rearrangement-Public Hearing Zoning District:Seasonal Recreational (5 Acre) Lot Area:55,215 square feet (1.26 acre) Application: The applicant has proposed a lot line rearrangement and lot combination for lots located at 650-660-670-680 Big Island. The lots are currently 3 separate seasonal residences on four tax parcels that are to be combined into 2 parcels. 3 existing cabins are located on the lots. As a result of the subdivision 1 cabin would be removed leaving 1 cabin on each of the 2 remaining tax parcels. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION; The Planning Commission recommended by a 5 to 0 vote to: Approve the application subject to the following conditions: 1. Remove the cabin on Lots 5 and 6 within 30 months of Council approval. 2. The applicants agree not to use the cabin during the 30 month time period. 3.All agreements for shared septic systems and wells be eliminated, as they will no longer be necessary. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rearrangement to create two parcels (Lots 3-4-5, Pleasant View and Lots 6-7-8, Pleasant View) subject to the following conditions; 1. 2. 3. 4. The existing cabin at 660 Big Island be removed along with the deck and stairway to include sidewalks and removal of the shed within the side yard setback of 30 feet. This being completed prior to the filing of the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement with Hennepin County. All existl.ig easements for septic and well use across other properties be vacated. Drainage and utility easements granted to the City 5' along interior property lines and 10' along the rear property lines. A Title Opinion shall be completed, and a copy provided to the City, prior to filing the subdivision. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To direct Staff to draft a resolution for adoption by the City Council. TO:Mayor Jabbour and Orono Council Members Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members FROM: Lyle Oman, Building Official DATE:April 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Building Code Requirements In regards to the proposed lot line rearrangement at 650,660, 670 and 680 Big Island, the building code requires that buildings within 3* of property lines have certain fire protection features. This would include a firewall with an extension that raises above the roof at the exterior wall. State statutes requires adoption and enforcement of the building code in the City of Orono without changes. The building code has provisions to accept equivalent materials or methods but does not have provisions for variances. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. i TO:Mayor Jabbour and Orono Council Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:April 9,1999 SUBJECT: #2461 Chris Pierson on behalf of Bryson/Johnson 650-660-670-680 Big Island Lot Line Rearrangement—Public Hearing Zoning District:Seasonal Recreational (5 Acre) Lot Area:55,215 square feet (1.26 acre) Application: The applicant has proposed a lot line rearrangement and lot combination for lots located at 650-660-670-680 Big Island. The lots are currently 3 separate seasonal residences on four tax parcels that are to be combined into 2 parcels. Elusims Address Legal Description 650 Big Island 660 Big Island Lots 7-8, Pleasant View (seasonal dwelling) Lots 5-6, Pleasant View (seasonal dwelling) * dwelling to be removed prior to filing subdivision 670 Big Island 680 Big Island Lot 4, Pleasant View (seasonal dwelling) Lot 3, Pleasant View Proposed Address Legal Description 650 Big Island 670 Big Island Lots 6-7-8, Pleasant View (seasonal dwelling) Lots 3-4-5, Pleasant View (seasonal dwelling) U2461 Christopher J, Pierson 650-660^7(^680 Big Island Lot Line Rearrangement 3/17/99 Pagf 1 ANALYSIS 650 Big Island (Lots 7 and 8, Pleasant View) has been legally combined into one tax parcel. The lot contains one seasonal dwelling that would remain upon completion of the proposed subdivision. With the addition of Lot 6 the property would increase to 28,186 s.f. from 19,074 s.f The total fronla?e on the lakeshore would also increase from 100' to 150'. The lot does contain a non-conforming septic system due to the system being located within 3' of the water table. However, lot line rearrangements do not require conforming sites as conditions will improve as the site will grow larger, and the number of residential units in the area will decrease. T.ot Area and Yards RS 5 acre Lot Area Lot Width Side Yard Rear Yard Lakeside Yard Existing 19,074 s.f.lor 12.11' 45'63' Proposed 28,186 s.f.151'60'45'63' The cabin does encroach into the 75' lakeshore setback. The lot would have an adequate building site outside of the 75' setback should a new cabin ever be constructed on the lot. The lot combination would place the septic tank and well on the same tax parcel. Currently, they are located on the adjacent lot. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 19,074 s.f.2,453.5 s.f.12.8% 28,186 s.f.2,533.5 s.f.8.9% The lot would not exceed the allowed lot coverage of 15%. U2461 Christopher J. Pierson 650-660'670-680 Big Island Lot Line Rearrangement 3/17/99 Page! * ! r Hardcover Location Lots 7-8 Lots 7-8 Lots 6-7-8 Lots 6-7-8 Distance from Shoreline 0-75' 75-250' 0-75' 75-250' Total Area in Setback 8,381 s.f. 10,693 s.f. 12,241 s.f. 15,945 s.f. Existing Hardcover 1,468.4 s.f. (17.5%) 2,245.7 s.f. (21.0%) 1,505.5 s.f (12.3%) 2,326.4 s.f (14.6%) Allowed Hardcover none (0%) 2,673.25 s.f (25%) none (0%) 3,986.25 s.f (25%) The existing hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback is mostly a deck located on the lakeshore. The deck does encroach over the property line to Lot 6. The lot combination would place the entire deck on the same property. 670 and 680 Big Island (Lots 3 and 4, Pleasant View) are not combined. The properties do serve as one common lot, and are under common ownership. The cabin is located on Lot 4 with a shed and deck/patio areas. A portion of an existing deck located at the shore of Lake Minnetonka does encroach over the lot line to Lot 3 (680 Big Island). Lot 3 is not developed and contains the septic system for the two adjacent lots to the south. Easements have been created across Lots 3 and 4 to Lots 5 and 6 for access to the septic site. These easements would be vacated when Lots 5 and 6 are split. The cabin on Lot 5 will be removed prior to the filing of the subdivision. At that time the septic lines will be capped and only the single cabin will have access. A lot line rearrangement will place the entire septic system on one tax parcel, eliminating the need for easements and maintenance agreements. Lot Area and Yards RS 5 acre Lot Area Lot Width Side Yard Rear Yard Lakeside Yard Existing 18,179 s.f 98'11.95'116'26' Proposed 27,029 s.f 149'60'116'26' The setbacks shown above assumes the removal of the cabin and shed on Lot 5. Which are both located in the side yard setback. The Code does not allow two dwellings on one lot under 5 acres in the RS Zoning District. U2461 Christopher J. Pierson 650^60-670^80 Big Island Lot Line Rearrangement 3/17/99 Page 3 Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 18,179 s.f.Ml62 s.f.9.7% 27,029 s.f.2,871.6 s.f.10.6% 1776.2 s.f. assumes removal of cabin 6.5% The lot would not exceed the allowed lot coverage of 15%. Hardcover Location Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Lots 3-4 0-75'7,372 s.f.1,819.4 s.f.none (24.6%)(0%) Lots 3-4 75-250'10,808 s.f.324.3 s.f 2,702 s.f (3.0%)(25%) Lots 3-4-5 0-75'10,905.8 s.f.2,875.2 s.f none (26.4%)(0%) Lots 3-4-5 75-250'16,123.2 s.f.632 s.f 4,030.8 s.f (3.9%)(25%) The hardcover in the 0-75' setback is due largely to the cabin that will remain on the property. Nearly the entire cabin is located within the 75' setback. tt246I Christopher J. Pierson 6SO-660-670-680 Big Island Lot Line Rearrangement 3/17/99 Page* 1 660 Big Island (Lots 5 and 6) will go away as a result of the lot line rearrangement. The property would be split leaving Lot 5 to join Lots 3 and 4, and Lot 6 to join Lots 7 and 8. The cabin is the primary issue of concern to Staff. Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (B) states the following regarding a private guest cabin on a lot: A conditional use permit may be issued for one or more private guest cabins provided the applicant demonstrates and the Council finds that the additional living or sleeping facilities will not contribute to overcrowding or overuse of a small property, will not adversely affect neighboring properties, and that extra private precautions are taken for fire protection and security of persons and property, as follows: 1. Private guest cabins shall be used solely by the occupants of the seasonal or principal dwelling, including their domestic employees, caretakers or non-paying guests. Private guest cabins shall not be rented or leased for compensation. 2. The minimum dry buildable record lot area required for approval of a private guest cabin conditional use permit without a variance shall be 5.0 acres. Approval of a private guest cabin conditional use permit on an existing record lot of less than 5.0 acres shall be subject to strict showing of compliance with health and sanitation performance standards. 3. The guest cabin(s) and the seasonal or principal dwelling shall all be connected to on-site sewage treatment system(s) in conformance with the requirements of Subdivision 12 of this Section. (Subdivision 12 states within the RS Zoning District all dwellings shall be connected to an on-site sewage treatment system to City Standards) 4. The guest cabin(s) and the seasonal or principal dwelling shall all be eqi’ipptd with approved smoke detection devices and with some form of manual or automatic fire extinguishing equipment. 5. All property in common ownership shall be combined into one tax parcel if contiguous; or if separated by public rights-of-wa^. a special lot combination form shall be executed and filed in the chain of title of each separate parcel. 6. Not more than one private guest cabin constructed without indoor plumbing, toilets or kitchen facilities, and used only for additional sleeping quarters, shall be permitted on any property as an accessory use without requiring a conditional use permit, provided the accessory cabin does not exceed 600 square feet in floor area and provided all accessory building performance standards are met. Use of more than one accessory building for additional sleeping quarters, or use of an accessory building in excess of 600 square feet in floor area, shall require issuance of a conditional use permit. 02461 Christopher J. Pierson 65M6M7(y480 Big island Lot Line Rearrangement 3/17/99 Page 5 Fire Code Issues The City does not allow structures to be located this close to a property line without meeting strict fire code standards. It is recommended by Staff the cabin on Lot 5 be removed prior to the City filing the Subdivision with Hennepin County. Both the cabin and shed are located well within the required 30' side yard setback. City Building Official, Lyle Oman has included a memo to explain the requirements for structures on property lines. Because the requirements are from the State Building Code, Cities do not have the right to grant variances from these standards. Therefore, in order for this subdivision to be approved the lot line must be moved to allow proper building setbacks or the cabin on Lot 5 shall be removed from the property prior to filing the subdivision. The Planning Commission recommendation was to approve the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement, allow the cabin to remain for 30 months after Council approval and t j disconnect services to the building. Setbacks as determined in the RS Zoning District for internal and rear property lines: Lot width 200 feet or greater ~ 50 feet 100 feet, but less than 200 — 30 feet less than 100 feet -- 10 feet Items for discussion 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Section 10.31, Subdivision 6 (C) (1) states lot line rearrangements between abutting properties that do not create an additional building site will normally be approved. The rearrangement will place two cabins on one lot The Code docs not allow more than one cabin on a lot witliout granting variances and a conditional use permit. The 670 Big Island property shares a septic system with the adjacent cabin that would be removed. All easements and agreements would be vacated at that time. The well and septic for the 650 Big Island property are located on another property that would be combined with 650. The entire septic and well would now be on one lot. The cabin on Lot 5 would be located approximately 1.5 feet from the lot line. Staff is recommending removal of the cabin. The applicant has stated his intent is to remove the cabin. 6. Any drainage and utility easements that arc located along the interior lot lines should be vacated. The City would require drainage and utility easements 5' along interior lot lines and 10' along the rear lot lines. U2461 Christopher J. Pierson 650-660^70^0 Big Island Lot Line Rearrangement X'17/99 Page 6 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rearrangement to create two parcels (Lots 3-4- 5, Pleasant View and Lots 6-7-8, Pleasant View) subject to the following conditions: 1.The existing cabin at 660 Big Island be removed along with the deck and stairway to include sidewalks and removal of the shed within the side yard setback of 30 feet. This being completed prior to the filing of the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement with Hennepin County. 2. 3. All existing easements for septic and well use across other properties be vacated. Drainage and utility easements granted to the City 5' along interior property lines and 10' along the rear property lines. 4.A Title Opinion shall be completed, and a copy provided to the City, prior to filing the subdivision. Attachments A B C D E F G H I J K L Application Plat Map Big Island Map Survey Site Plan Site Topography Septic System Easement and Maintenance Agreement for 660 and 670 Big Island Lot 3-8 Ownership Property Owners List Permit Record - 660 Big Island Permit Record - 670 Big Island Hardcover Worksheets %246l Christopher J. Piet son 65M60^70^0 Big Island Let Line Rearrangement 3/17/99 Page! I jjr ^ A Application # G / Date Received fejj ^ Amount Paid^ 3E>0 ■* CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address 650, 660, 670 and 680 Big Island Properly Identification Number (PID) (see attached) Please check one - Property X abstract or Attach legal description to application. torrens? APPLICANT jsjame Christopher J. Pierson Pierson & Pierson. PLLP City Wayzata, MN Zip SS“HQiPhone (work) OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ( see attached) Address Phone (home) Citv Zio Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units ? spasnna l Other (specify)_________ PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes X Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) _________ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites ____3 Existing Units ____0 New Units 2 Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per___Acres Sq Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) %.J \ - X echea 'TIo’nIpinTT 'lAKE''MINN^TONKA •. / CVAC'287\l/.ISi.5j'2-);’''. ' X '>>; » ----r— cX V "! * /p V. X "o' f9) f--A------ •r 1 t \TT\. Z (10) ” *is • • »*«* *1V>' s 5 10)'!)Ur^ R i R .N 26 S'*’ ^-... oo) (10.5b, V.V I ^(33) « (32) P0 “KiraiiL's suiPiv; eOVEmSCIIT ILOTi i M iEeTI©S!l 22 TOt 7 EAtSeS 23 “ : /•.LCT 4 mmi's smp o WKMMWf LOTS 6 'H seefiM ss ,57 •V . /iT fr^i^ » ««v , • y y *V% SNIDER'S SUBDIVISION OF LOT DWONVTSIOIU-Oa HNvirinivNiaoa-oK KosvaoNimKoa-o9s 080HM00115*045 SHVOVIOMOIO-Mf UIXMin^ X lUXMMlX - §19 TllUUaJS8aM*9C9 i' • •• * o CO os o 3 \ I 5j (x>noj(c80 (p(oO. (oSO . ‘V / SEPTIC SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION, EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made as of this *2.1^ day of 1995, by and between Elizabeth Foster Prince, a widow not remarried (hereinafter called *'Prince") and William E. Bryson II and Thelma L. Bryson, husband and wife (hereinafter called the ’’Brysons”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Prince is the owner of certain property located on Big Island, Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as Lots 5 and 6, Pleasant View, Lake Minnetonka (hereinafter called the "Prince Parcel); and WHEREAS, The Brysons are owners of certain adjacent property legally described as Lots 3 and 4, Pleasant View, Lake Minnetonka (hereinafter called the "Bryson Parcel); and WHEREAS, the City of Orono is requiring the installation of an approved septic system to serve each property; and the parties hereto understand that the City of Orono will approve and authorize the construction and maintenance of a single septic system to serve the Prince Parcel and the Bryson Parcel; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to enter into an agreement with respect to the construction, installation and maintenance of a single septic system to serve both the Prince Parcel and the Bryson Parcel; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The parties agree to construct and install a septic system to serve both the Prince Parcel and the Bryson Parcel, the drainfielu of which septic system will be located on the Bryson* Parcel and connect by supply line to a pumping chamber and tanks located on the Prince Parcel and further connecting by pipe lines to the respective dwellings on the Prince Parcel and the Bryson Parcel, all as shown on the design drawing attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 2. The parties shall mutually agree upon a licensed septic contractor to construct and install such septic system, and shall share equally in the cost thereof, and all associated costs. including septic permit and attorney fees in connection with this agreement. 3. The parties agree to cooperate fully with the septic contractor, and to allow said septic contractor access to and across their respective properties in connection with said septic system construction and installation. * n i ! • # 4. The palsies agree to share equally in the cost of all naintenance and repairs to such septic system, subseq[uent to its construction and installation. If either party incurs costs in the maintenance and repair of such septic system, said party shall notify the other party thereof in writing, and the other party shall pay its one-half share of such costs within thirty (30) days of such written notice. 5. Each of the parties hereto hereby grants to the other party a nonexclusive easement for the use, maintenance and repair of the septic system, including drainfield, supply lines, pumping chamber and tanks, and connecting pipe lines to the parties' respective property dwellings, all as shown on Exhibit 1. Such easement shall include a right of access across the Prince Parcel and the Bryson Parcel as is reasonably necessary to install, use^. maintain and repair said septic system. 6. Subsequent to the construction and installation of such septic system, the parties agree to attach hereto as Exhibit 2 a copy of an ”as built” survey of such septic system, which Exhibit 2 shall thereupon replace Exliibit 1 for purposes of defining the easement and maintenance agreements incorporated in this Agreement. The parties hereto agree to share equally in the costs of said ”as built” survey. •• 7. The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto, their respective heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, and shall run with the land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands as of the day and year first above written. ElizeTbeth Fos^r^rince lUM^^ <6. William E. Bwilliam £. Bri^ Thelma L. Bry^ri STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing^instrument as acknowledged before me this / /■^ day of jAuw widow not rematlf-ied. ty'ST' 1995,^y Elizabeth Foster Prince, a STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS Wnt-ary Pubi \ d CHRISTIC. DYSART I NOTAftYPUBUC-UINNESOTA U| CaaffliuSoaEipkMJ**-*>•*** ^ COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this «$?/ ^ ^day of , 1995, by William E. Bryson II and Thelma L. Bryson, husband'and wifer— WtBAK MOWrebN «IMYPUUC«MMMTA HENNEWWCOU Wr/ Notary Public This instrument drafted by: William K. Wangensteen Attorney at Law 900 E. Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata, MN 55391 m Jll o theChapteJkf 0 0)x: lU v' g A-ci •naa u I (. on c co< W) ie £ ISm ^ s § «I" 6 B g 9u •O jq C3 O O Oti ^ c « o *o Ui O -Oe ^ o r VO O S ^ ^ ^ T3s 151 =lgg O•n o >o ocs w 5 o« C/3 C/5•s °^ S Oo CO c> « o « O S u ^ 9‘ < CO CQ ooo VO Bo -s 0£ 2 4» ^ nJ O ta • mm CO o COs r- VO O^o VO om VO cd -Sd C “:i^ o O '-I nJ .J cd e c:§ B J3 ^J g ®:!i 00 •Occd o r- CO o o> .*'-k t '^v*v) f.-'-r ^ ? • •' . v <y •-H ^-4 H 3pr^T-» .-«. V" *.^-v *.‘_ l‘ 'k'i 2:o ►-H *« B C2 o O oa o • ►-H #> o § c=*CQ Q • •—• G S ^o c c w o ^ l-E”? • ® 0^ B J O Pi WN 1 i CurrentOwnersw J .1 I S a W J 1 I TZ 5J ^ H UJ J . £ g < Cd P CO^ o ifl m < CO 0^ §• • M- 5 00 5 o rfooo ooo Tf <N VO CN Oo »-M CNoo t—4cn • Ed H O A mcs 1r- 1 (N m CN 1 ^-41 • CN m • CN ^Vl m f;*r-« r—< •—4 1 CNz. < Ui < (N CN CN CN Ed •occd 1 1 s «: L & • IIIo o toi V &s o</) Uim :i ss H iH < */) H -J H _ 10 M UJ «l X CM ai X Oe X I O H lU KMX M A S •• M I/) _ K ^ in uj «J «n :!. s CO M M >A UI i/i___ to M M M H CM UJ UJ -J ,LI2»»ri^ • ^ ^ 40 O CM UI UJ UJ O ~ -- o « O M M N SM o X r lo u K) -J O _ _ CO CO CO fO M X X UJ CM UI UI >I o a. a. < KM _ •H a UI < X I 40 > »o2iilinfO « o _ 10 o Q *1 M sm H<o. Ma. s § U1 CO < 0.UJoc O' Vm N lAJ o 10 10 u !< 10 • Ul l&l S lO o CO o A ut 8 » :|eeI :hu•J i| «J H S UJ H CO 10|L H ^ Sij m4 m-U toj e lu w «j A S S o S !j A e UJ lil V A o. A O oc OC U r-l S •J mJ CMAe A »J A ^ A M ^ CM M I A X K M rC H I ACMCM e A CM A < S X -I cbJ a: CM H CM (H U\ U) IS®*A r-l < AAA A UJ . ' sr;,— r4CM'O A A U »- A h- O►- UJ oc O § X o o2u.< X < UJ OL UJ X X S § < X X O H •o *45 *v.S'a!/ Ul A g X X 1 HABDCOVERP^is^UL SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ON?) TYTSTlNf? HARDCOVER TN ZONE ^----- A. House _______________ X ____ ATION WORKSHEET 75-250* 250-500* Lenttfi Width B. Oanige.. “ C. WveWiO^. D. Sidew^ E. Pado/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plasdd Or Fabric • • • O. (jdier *. 4rnti^' X X X V -iu X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A B “7 %n xlOO - ^OPOSFn WARPCOVER IN ZONE • A. House________________X Lenflh Width B. Oarage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk • • E Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X X X X X X L I 500-1000* . T S.F. S.F. ST. S.F. L •S.F. SJ. SJ^. ^ SJ. qS“. & .S.F.© q SJ. isz- q _________.S.F. _________S.F. SP. 30 2.0- */sjO> 1 gl9-</ ST. A S.F.' B S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ^. S.F. ST, ST. “S.F. S.F. S.F. ,S.F. s:f. S.F. &F- G. OAer • • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ____________ B XlOO - TL ST. S.F. A ST. B ^ “I *^ >7 *• HARDCOVER CALCULA' SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* ’pyiSTTNC HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _______________ X ____ ORKSHEET 250*500’500-1000’ Length Width B. Oarage.. C, Driveway . X X X * • i »• • ••• X X • • D. Sidewalk X X E. Fado/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A I) ♦ B /o &0&- xlOO - m fPftPOSED HARDCQVERINZQME A. House Length Width X X X B. Oarage C Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deek X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X tio-u S.F. SJ. ST. ^ S.F. CD * r S.F. •S.F. "S.F. I *i. •2.a». ST. ST.O> ST. i-zS-S" ST.rg^ .ST. ST. ST. ST. 324.3 ST. A IQ. ^£>6.0 S.f: B 3.0 % ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. _ST. ST. -ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. O. Other • •ST. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + B XlOO - ST. A S.F. B 1 I 0 //A <«a •^. * • 'W11 C:..-y.- ■■ J4 .; 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 612/476-6010 fox 612/476-8532 codd^fro.com IHFRA Destined Scale None Drown DW5 Project No. 11170 Dole 12/10/98 Sheet No. HARDCOVER CALCULATION SHEET L0TS3&4 HARDCOVER C^CULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75.250’ 250-500’ yyiynNC H ardcov £R tn — IrKTXi C T Co 500-1000' A. House <Kon.^ SJ. Length Width X X _________S.F. 3e>. O SJF. S.F. B. Oarage.. C Driveway • • • f • • X- •SJ. X X .•S.F. SJ. D. Sidewalk X X SJ^. E, Fatio/Deck X X s.F.^ SJF.S> F. Landse^ie Underiain By Plasdo Or Fabric X X X C^o«-7 .S.F. (D _ _ _ _S.F. SJ. O.—S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 1.0 . ^ B xlOO - 0^3. SF- A S.F.- B ypftPOSEn TTARPCQVER TN ZONE A. House_______________3C Si^. Lentth Width X X X S.F. S.F. SJ. B. Garage C. Driveway SJ. X X SJ, SJ, D. Sidewalk X X I •-SJ. SF. E. Patio/Deck X X 5F. ^SF. F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X S.T. SF. SF. • • 0. Oiker SF. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ♦ B SF. A SF. B XlOO - 44. A i-i WU ^ '"2£ HARDCOVER CALCULATIO SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' y VTSTTNC HARDCOVER TN ZO?^ A. House _______________ X _ ORKSHEET 250-500* Ljotx s S f tc> 500-1000' 3.F. Length WU(h 5HEC»X X X • * • •^ • •• • •• B, Garase C. Driveway .X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Pario/Deck X X F. Landscape Underiab By PlastiO Or Fabric X X X S.F. <3> : ST. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. "70 I S.F.<§) ST. . l ST. 6g> CV>. n S.F. S.F. ’sT. "ST. • • 4 • 0. OAcr 1 tT. g»ST. Q> TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE T0TALPR0||mAKEAm20KE^ x,00 ■i&SM ST. A o ST; B yp^POSFD TTARPCQVER TN ZONE A. House ________________X ST. Len|th Width X X X ST. ST. S.F. B. Garage ST. C Driveway X X . ST. ST. D. Sidewalk X X 2ST. ST. E. Patio/Deck X X ST. S.F. F. Landscape UnderlaG; By Plastic Or Fabric X X X ST. ST. ST. G. Other ST. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + B xlOOVf ST. S.F. % A 3 V.’ «• ■f>va»%J 0'%.. — * Q4S.10 US OjEAMOnS \ \ \ uii!?'’ A6”t, \5^ lOCOK ✓ H §2 ,^,0.01 ,-•■ ■ 75 ---- M rs 4 .., •' •■ ^ "*i: 15050 23rd Avenue North Y HH tk Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 V ill! f"H 11 612/476-6010Y^IWI ■ ■ mn fox 612/476-8532 • McCogteftwk Bjw £^Uoil: cadd9mfra.com Designed Scale None Drown Project No. QMS 11170 Dote Sheet No. 12/10/98 HARDCOVER CALCULATION SHEET LOTS 5 & 6 t eHAKDCOVERC^CULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) (@) 7M50' 250-500’ 500-1000’' •EYTSTTNC HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House B ♦ O S.F. LcntOi • X width S.F. X • * M S.F. X %S.F. B. Garage.•• • C. Driveway . X ’1•m1•1• • r S.F. ' . X • • . i * • • • • • . . Wtl t • • • •:.s.F. X SJ. D. Sidewrdk X • iO“7.3 S.F. ^ X •,SJ. E. Pado/Dedc t X s (£> X ■ -•7 ST S.F. ® F. Landscape Underlain By Plastid Or Fabric • • • • • 0. Other STWi«*-5- • X •S.F. X S.F. X ■■ST. X • 33.6> • s>.(2> TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE - PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 1 W ta ft . W B S.F. A TOTAl A 03& 1.0 S.F; B 5^3 e>c • xioo - _n. • • TOApnicFn T?AiincovER IN ZONE • • • • ••• h. House X ■■S.F. Lenjlh _ X W*.dih • ST. X «S.F. X ■■ST. B. Oarage C Driveway X * • ST. • X • _ ••ST. X ST. • D. Sidewalk X •r ' • *“ST. X >■ST. • • • E. Patio/Deek ' x'' •• wtt • ST. X S.F. F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric 0. Other X \ ^ST. X ■i S.F. X -ST. >• • • • * X . . • • *. •S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ B xlOO - S.F. A SJF. 3 u.c%fhi->ur ,<»* ■ « ca'.^ni o HARDCOVER CALCULATIONWORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) TTyrynNC w arpcqver IN ZONE A. House ■ 0-75' X 250-500* L-^7 ^ 'I ^ 500-ioro' H5-.S SJ. <X> Lcotih•width . X ■■ iMl-S J. X SJ. X ■" ^ • - %_SJ. • • • • ••• ^ * •• • •• •• • •• • / Tt. Garaee • - —SJ. •• • C- E^vcWaV - * • . * • • • • . . X •■■ 1 a•.1•••1•• • ••SJ. X — -—SJ. T>, SMewaOe • X .IW. M —SJ.® X —SJ. V Patio/Dedc • I X __S.F. V TjinitifiaM X .S.F. TTfiderlatn X m S.F. Thf Plaftid X m ___SJ. OrFabrip • • • • • • • e • 0. 6*er *. • • X ____ *2 3. M _s J. (D TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA W ZONE A . -7-2.WS-.-7 B lOC>92> ypoposP-T: Warpcqver in zone A. House _____________X _---------------- xlOO - SJ. A lO.u^S.o S.F.' B a/.g% Lensth Wlddi B. Cange C. Driveway X X X D. SWewaDc • • E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underiain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. S.R '• SJ. SJ. O. o&er TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ____________ B XlOO - SJ. SJ. SJ. % A B •• / v ’- ( i >7 ff /. J J An ..I »• r ^.. »•***'r*\ • • f • %t CCrV I• . J5050 23rd Avenue North IIM A Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 111 l”n 11 P^one 612/476-60W ■■■■ ■ fax 612/476-8532 ***^*5^clflet*lDC caddOmfra.com Designed Drown DWS Dote 12/1 D/98 Scole None Project No. 11170 Sheet No. HARDCOVER CALCULATION SHEET LOTS 7 & 8 MAKUCO VI!;K calc ULA ’I SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ON?) O-TS* y YTgTTNC W APT>C0VBR TN ZONE A House _______________ X _ ^VUKKbMLLi 250-500* Leostii WU(h B. SUSP . 7 c. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Pado/Deck F. Landscape Underlain ByPlasdC Or Fabric • 4 • O. srP|iP-^>. X X X X X X X. X X X . X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE fo^2.>0 B IhtiZIL xlOO • ppoPOSEP HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House —_______ Unjth _Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk « £• Pado/Dcck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X X X X X X 500-1000’ tfO. (o :?.F (2> igM.7. SF- ® : _________SJ. S.F. -SJ, • SJ. "SJ. 10. S . I f A I a-s*. ST C^^Z.O__SF. A lUi'T.li.'Z. _S.F.‘ B % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. SF. -S.F. “SF. S.F. S.F. SF. SF. SF. O. Other SF. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ B SF. A SF. B _ _ __ X100 - WOi ii .. rA 1 y ?M ? S3 ^ ^ N • ^ % • J- ✓ / . f /^/V.M7.Mf^/(CO <o/*o vsf '6?*?.i '"" \ \\wl\ ^OOR i»» ® fV.OO^ :/y viW. • # ngS? > 94M0 s»e'‘Vl©3. SS J2i oO ^ I o O^ o I min" 0:2 ,1 / 'J •* ?*X^, 15050 23rd Avenue North ■III 101^ H Plymouth. Minnesota* 55447 IWI phone 612/476 —6010 IWI I I fax 612/476-8532 McCombs Frink Rpos f-MqH: codd&m fra. com Associates, Inc. OesigneO Scolo Nont Drown Project No. DWS 11170 Dote Sheet No. 12/10/98 HARDCOVER CALCULATION SHEET TYTgTfNC W ATlPCbVER TN ZONE A. House ______________ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ICLE ONE> 75-250’ 250-500’ Lcofth WUih X X X B. Gertge.. C Drivewty . X X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Dcck X X F. Landscape Uaderiibi By Plaide OrFArie X . X X • • 9 s • O. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE lS~o S. g ♦ B •• xlOO " ppoPOSED HARDCOVER IM ZQME A. House______________ Length Width X X X B. Gtnge C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Pado/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underi^ By Plastic Or Fabric X X 500-1000’ ^ > 6.0 S J. O SJ. SJ. S.F. SJ. SJ. SJ. \on. a SJ.(3) SI, VOJ •> ■ g S.F. ® •S.F. 'S.F. SJ. e>e>. s>. (H) /sos,^ ra.'x-M \ .3. SJ. A S.F.- B % S.F. S.F, SJ. SJ. SI. SI, SI. -SI. "si. SI. SI. ST. SI. SI. O. Odier S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ♦ B "i. ■■ I ; . 1 i • .*' *. i T A? . .. J •/ ^ V .J 1 ‘ f 4:4 .*J Vt u iI S.F. SJ. % A B SgTiS?SKI HABDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* 250-500’ A. House X - Lenfih width X X X •mm .. • •••* »••••.•: • • B. S^co " •X* ‘ •• C. E>riveW*y . • • . * . X • • •• • •• • • • M X ■ D. Sidewalk • X • X E. Pado/Deck • X X • F. Landscape Underlain ByPlasdd Or Fabric • « •• X • • X • X • • 4 m 0. • • X • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE • TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE m A iC^VS". o- XTOO " ••• vvnvnsrn TTARDCOVER IN ZONE •• • • A. House X ■ Lentth Width X - ■ X ■ X ■ B. Garage C. Driveway X m • X m ■ X .*• • • D. Sidewalk • X • • ■ X ■ • • ••. •• E. Pado/Deck X • 1 X ' F. Landscape UnderlaUi X •• 1 X ByPIasdc Or Fabric X • •m ^ G. Other • • • • • X .. • ♦ • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _____________ B LAs 500-1000* SJ. O SJ. SJ. S.F. ~]«4. \ SJF. SJ. S J. © SJ. 1ft.^ ftp .n s J. <© S J. ® .S.F. “SJ. SJ. __SJ. d) ^ SJ. A /gqvs.o S.F.- B iM. (g_______% .SJ. SJ. “S.F. ”SJ. S.F. SJ. SJ. -SJ. “SJ. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. • •S.F. S.F. SJ. % A 3 /? miiiiiiwiiimiii' I \ I •45.10 5! 2^ • I I gl t ». !ii\ LJ f40.^3l t•'-'a i oi Is 2 < 82 8o • I 8 i %# 16.05 ^- 45.6^ l?Sf' ® \ \ \\! \ V \ \5 \ \ \vS5^ UTe* 220.0^ jStHC »<0M^ /5050 4?Jrrf Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 612/476-6010 fox 612/476-8532 McCombs Frank Hoot £*_a/o/7: codd^ fro.com Associites. Inc. ______________ MFRA Designed Scole None Drown Project No. OWS 11170 Dole Sheet No. 12/10/98 •8 2 8 183^ < < fO QO p o pm ^ I / / / HARDCOVER CALCULATION SHEET Application Date: Completion Date: Deadline Date: 2/17/99 2/17/99 4/18/99 COUNCIL MFETING APR I Wi REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY Oh UnuiMO DATE: 3/29/99 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2462 David Lovelace 220 Big Island Variance-Public Hearing Zoning District:Seasonal Recreational (5 acre) Lot Area:4.3 acres Application: The ^plicant is requesting a lot area vanance to create a buildable lot on Big Island. The existing lot is 4.3 acres where 5 acres is the minimum lot size for building. The applicant has purchased the lot and plans to construct a seasonal residence in the near future. Most lots on Big Island were granted automatic lot area variances in 1983 when the island was rezoned to RS (5 acre). Property owners were given the opportunity to file a short application form on their individual lots to the City. All property owners returning forms to the City were granted variances by Resolution. The resolutions state each lot is a RECORD LOT and may be used for one- family seasonal recreational use without a structure; or a single new seasonal dwelling may be built; or an existing seasonal dwelling may be used, improved, added-onto or icplaced; all without requiring further City Council review of lot size. The variances were granted on developed and undeveloped lots, and the one year expiration time period was waived. A previous property owner was given the opportunity to apply for the automatic variance several times in the 1980s, but never responded to the offers. In 1986 the automatic variance at no cost t./ the property owner had expired. This application requires the following variance: 1.Section 10.31, Subdivision 6 requires 5.0 dry acres for a lot to be buildable. The applicant’s lot is under 5.0 acres and did not file for an automatic variance in the 1980s and requests to do so now. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 5 to 0 vote to: Approve the variance as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To approve or amend the enclosed resolution. Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.31— RS Seasonal Recreational District Condition of Property The lot contains an old cabin that is inhabitable. The roof has caved in and walls are falling. The applicant must apply to the City for a demolition permit and remove the existing cabin prior to new construction. A small wetland exists in the center of the property. It is a non-Orono wetland. The following activities on the property must meet minimum setbacks from the wetland. Structure Grading/Fili Septic Sites/Well 26' 26’ 75 ’ Property Access Big Island contains a network of platted roads that are undeveloped. Access to inland lots is provided by the plaited right-of-ways. No permits or improvements are required to use the roads. The main concern for inland property owners is boat storage since they do not have riparian rights Private property owners are not permitted to provide dock space or boat storage on their properties for access to inland residents and guests. Although permits would not be regularly issued, the City Council can grant permits for dock space or boat storage within public right-of-ways. Not more than one seasonal dock will be approved for access to any one property. In review and approval or denial of such permit, the Council will consider the topography and development of the locality. The dock must also conform to Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and City of Orono standards. Surrounding Properties The property is a landlocked parcel without lake access. Access to the property is via platted, undeveloped roads. A road is platted that is located adjacent to the east and southern portions of the applicant ’s property. The west side of the parcel is the Dr. Arthur Allen Wildlife Refuge (Hennepin County Parks). The north side of the property is a year round residence that is currently occupied. 1^2462 David Lovelace 220 Big Island Variance 4/12/99 Page! Issues 1.No variance was granted to permit 220 Big Island to be a legal, record lot. The opportunity to apply to the City for a "free" automatic variance has expired. 2. 3. One property to the north exists without lake access. The lot has been in use for many years. The main concern for inland property owners is boat storage since they do not have riparian rights. Private property owners are not permitted to provide dock space or boat storage on their properties for access to inland residents and guests. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variance to permit 220 Big Island to be a buildable lot, and to waive the one year expiration for the variance. Attachments A B C D E F Application/Statement of Hardship Plat Map Big Island Map Site Topography Property Owners List Historical documents regarding variance for 220 Big Island §2462 David Lovelace 220 Big Island Variance 4/12/99 Pag^2 j APPROVING A LOT AREA VARIANCE FOR RECORD LOT NO. 8 (220 BIG ISLAND) PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 246, MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31 FILE #2462 Minnesota: BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono, Hennepin County, FINDINGS 1.That David Lovelace is the owner of record of the following described property located within the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District of the City of Orono: Lot B, Morse Island Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the property). 2.That in adoption of Ordinance No. 246, the City Council reviewed ownership, development and use patterns on the islands and determined that all the above described property combined is and shall hereinafter and henceforth be one "Record Lot" as defined in Section 10.31 of said ordinance. 3.That all the above described property when combined as one Record Lot is still less than the n^mum lot size required for new lots in the RS District, but that this Record Lot is being used and/or may be used in the future for any permitted u?“ in the RS District without adverse effect upon public health, safety or welfare. CONCLUSION The City Council of Orono hereby grants a lot area variance to the above described Record Lot based on the above findings and subject to the following conditions: 1.This Record Lot including all the above described property combined shall henceforth be continued in common ownership by the same person or persons even if recorded as separate lots or tax parcels, and it shall not be subdivided, sold in parts, reduced in area or otherwise separated without application for and approval of a subdivision by the City. This condition shall not preclude future sale or transfer of the complete "Record Lot" as a single unit. Page 1 of 3 r 2. 3. Granting this variance means this Record Lot may be used for one-family seasonal recreational use without a structure; or a single new seasonal dwelling may be built; or an existing seasonal dwelling may be used, improved, added-onto or replaced; all without requiring further City Council review of lot size, but subject to strict compliance with all building permit, setback, hardcover, on-site sewage treatment and other performance standards for development in the RS District. Granting this variance shall not vest any rights in the property other than as specifically provided in Ordinance No. 246, and shall not preclude a future City Council from amending, modifying or otherwise limiting development rights and/or performance standards in the RS District. 5.The undersigned has read and understood the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, agrees that the above described property constitutes a single Record Lot; agrees that the Record Lot use may be so limited by the City; and agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of April, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of3 E- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ^ 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) On this day of ^ 199 _before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 3 of3 A Application tf i2.^(cX Date Received ? Amount Paid ^ ^ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) f PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address D. ^ ■ Property Identification Number (Rl.D.)_ . •€ «« *.• *Attach legal description to^pUcation if not included on required survey. TrapefRr^cquire d rf h I ^_________ I (do)(Ydo npt) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Date Pn .03-/n>2,3 2^ O02f> included (month/year) Present use of property: Zonipg District:__ residential t land. \ I other (specify ) / / |A f A rO T APPLICAIJJT Name ^NT ; J)Av/0 Lov^/i^ct" Phone (home)-7/0 Address: |2.n ____ Phonefwork ) /p / 7. ^ 7 ^ City: fiUCOKPf) Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant] Name AV1 HP XcLr (■ ^ Address: l^li Phone (home ) 17. 4/ 7V. (cS7-(o Phone (work) ^ iKUA£^ Cily:FXdJO^klre.Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: CdP / A i i\iUC^ pi A UK') 'Iyj .l/jni l7»/ fO/UN / f^ll S>f^i£LiD CJP ^ (att^h additional sheets if necessary) i VAMANCES REQUIRED V Lot Area Setback: ___Lot Width Front Side Hardcoyer Rear Lot Coyerage Ayerage Lakeshoi Ol Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual pr^erty conditionspreyenting compliance with Zoning Code requirements: UO f ^ K^ta^G^Y Si'2^ , j_ .A, y-.-i - - / - - - - ---------f>y< diet ............... ............... ............... , ^Ng./cj (attach additional sheets if necessary) :ompliance with Zoning Code retirements: LlOr 1.S 6/2? 7>ipgiif(iii3 ,^i'nhiirk fm\Unn.< pvof> cuiiLieif< fi^pniu ifnvr'iinitir/ hf)eiiu>n /' • (attach additional sheets if necessary) lyr t^O ^\'cl 6 :ty of opono • •* .•■ \ •«. . Ta5T HT5T H2i)^ "Tzt _________^ A?-//7-^5-/V \ < k •oM/dKVTaora-off HNVaTDIVNiaOM-OK ursnvtf vi’a-9^ HOS«aQN3IINOa*09( tlOHMOOllS-OtS SMVaVI3«019-009 XUXM<n4 X UUNMVI • Olf TlUlttlXSIIXM-0C9 SSi3 §3 v« I B V CITYofORONO Post Office Box 66 •Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices m On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka March 10, 1986 Georgia Ruud 13611 Valley View Rd Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Record Lot #8 Dear Big Island Landowner: In reviewing our Big Island files, it has come to the City's attention that you (or a previous owner of your Big Island property) never returned the proper forms for granting of an automatic lot area variance in 1983, when the *'RS" or Seasonal Recreational Zoning District was created. Perhaps this was an oversight, or perhaps you did not wish to return the forms at that time. In either case, your Big Island property currently has NOT been officially granted variances to lot area or lot width, and you would have to file for these variances in order to be allowed to do any building or remodeling on your property. Although nearly 2/3 of the Big Island property owners returned the proper forms to be granted the lot area variances in 1983 (at no cost to the property owner), approximately 1/3 have not returned them, and the filing fee for a variance application currently is $150.00. Because there may have been some misunderstandings of the no-cost automatic variance procedure in 1983, you again have the opportunity to return the proper forms and be granted the lot aiea variance ^ no chazge. Attached you will find the following documents: A) Copy of letter to you dated February 15, 1983, describing how to be granted the automatic lot area variances. B) The official record lot notice (blue paper). C) 3 copies of an official resolution draft (white paper with green City logo). D) A description of specific uses that require a Conditional Use Permit (yellow paper). BUILDING A ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING Page 1 of 2 ADMINISTRATION A FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 pricest). Treen^papirK'* '^'’® area variance F) A sununary of the 1983 "RS" Zoning Ordinances. • The procedure to follow in order to be granted the automatic lot area variance is as follows: 1) Review the information on the blue record lot notice. If no changes are necessary, sign all 3 copies of the official resolution draft and have them notarized. Send all 3 copies back to the City. ^ wish to apply for a specific use that requires a ' Conditional Use Permit, note that on the yellow form and return that form also. 3) Sign the green lot combination form and return it to the Citv with the other items. ^ Forms must be submitted by Wednesday, April 30, 1986 in order to if variance at no cost. Please contact Mike Gaffron at the City offices at 473-7357 if you have any questions. CITYofOROJfO Post Oflioe Box 66 • Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323* Municipal Offices February 15, 1983 ^----N f Record Lot ^8 j ey View Rd Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Island Landowner: On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka fe/?3 OE«t/-FJP 23-n7-23 23 J^ot /Jtf' oP H/ir/f3 ffoZS J The purpose of this letter Is to provide you with Infornatlon regarding the recent zoning changes on Big Island, and how these changes nay affect your property. The new RS Seasonrl Recreational zoning regulations were established- by City Council adoption of Ordinance ^246 on December 30, 1982. This action also ended the development moratorium that had been In effect since November 9, 1981. A summary of the ordinance Is attached. If you are Interested, a complete text of the ordinance Is also available for a nominal charge of $3.00 to defer printing and nailing costs. Your property Is Identified in the ordinance by the Record Lot Number shown above and on the attached blue page. This Identification is part of a special section that Inventories lot by lot the ownership patterns and existing uses of island property. Based on this record, the ordinal then ''grandfathers'* building rights for these Record Lots by making the: eligible for lot area variances. This means that for the first time even If your lot Is less than five acres (or two acres under the prevlot ordinance) that you may now build a new seasonal cabin, or If you alreac have a cabin,that It may continue to be used. Improved, added-onto or replaced with a new cabin, subject to building permits and setback regulations, etc., but without questioning Its use for building purpose: and without requiring any special City Council review. In order for you to automatically receive the benefits of the lot area variance, you should review and complete the following before July 1, 1983: 1. Please verify the Record Lot Information on the attached blue page and notify the City If there Is a problem or a change. (over) BL'ILDISCa ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING administration a finance - 473-7358 FUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 Island Landowners February 15, 1983 Page 2 2. If the Record Lot Information is complete, please sign, have notarized and return Che white Variance Resolution. State law requires that all zoning variances be recorded with Che County Recorder in resolution form. Returning this resolution is optional but if you choose not to do so, you may be required to pay a fee and file a formal variance application in the future if you ever plan to do any building on the property. There is no fee for havln this automatic variance recorded at this time. 3. If your Record Lot consists of two or more separate tax parcels, a green form for requesting a combined assessment is enclosed. Pleas sign and return this Co the City to allow your tax records to be changed into one parcel consistent with Che zoning and to assure Che most favorable tax race possible. 4. A conditional use permit issued by the City Council is required for certain land uses in the RS District, including the following residential uses: a) If you use or have used your cabin FOR MORE THAN 180 DAYS/YEAR. b) If you have MORE THAN ONE CABIN on your property. Refer to Che enclosed yellow sheet for a definition of these uses including a description of when a special permit is or is not requi If you wish to apply for a permit, mark the yellow page and return to the City. We will send you the appropriate application form by return mail. A postage-paid envelope is enclosed for your use in returning Che above forms to the City. If you have any questions about ,this, please call Alan Olson or Jeanne Mabusth at 473-7357. On behalf of the City Council and Planning Commlcsion, I want to take this opportunity to thank each and everyone of you whose interest and participation this past year has helped so much in Che completion of this planning process. I have certainly enjoyed meeting all of you and learning so much about your Island. I hope this last step can be kept as- simple as possible so chat your property rights can be correctly recorded for your future benefit. Sincerely, /Axan t*. Olson City Planner Enclosures © CITYt^ORON Post Office Box 66* Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323* Municipal Offices A73 7337On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ORDINANCE NO. 246 RS SEASONAL RECREATIONAL ZONING OFFICIAL RECORD LOT NOTICE FEBRUARY 15, 1983 This notice is provided to the owner/taxpayer of record according to Ordinance tf246. Section 34.336. The following Record Lot classification will be considered accurate and final unless you have some reason to dispute the facts used to make the classification. Record Lot Identification forms the basis for the granting of automatic lot area variances that "Grandfather" existing properties of less than 5 acres In area. RECORD LOT means all the contiguous or abutting land owned in common by the same person or persons as of November 9, 1981, (the effective date of the Island moratorium) or at any time such common-ownership may occur thereafter. Including one or more separately plotted lots or unplatted parcels of land, and/or one or more separately Identified tax parcels. Because of the unique circumstances and actual use patterns existing on the islands, also included within the definition of a "Record Lot" Is commonly-owned land that Is contiguous except for being separated only by platted unopened public right-of-way. Record Lot #8 Georgia Ruud 13611 Valley View Rd Eden Prairie, MN 55344 This RECORD LOT consists of_1 as follows: tax parcel(s) 23-117-23 23 0028 APPROXIMATE SIZE 4 .3 ACRES t CLASSIFICATION: (•lie is •xclusive or"any wtlands) OVER 10 ACRES, (taay be SUBDXVZDABLE) OVER 5 ACRES, but LESS THAN 10 ACRES » Cconforming but not SUBDIVIDABLE) ^ SOBSTANDARD/BUILDABLE (less than S acresf a new seasonal cabin may be built, or an existing seasonal cabin may be improved, added-onto or replaced, subject to setbacks, permits, etc., but without requiring further City Council review) _ _^UNBUZLDABLE (means a vacant lot of less than 1/2 acre; may be used for recreational purposes without a cabin, but requires a Council approved variance to be built on) EXISTING USB CLASSIFICATION X recreational use only (without a cabin) (at' this, tiro _ _SEASONAL CABIN. UMd 180 days or laas/yaar (if your cabin is usad more than 180 days/ year, please conpleta the YELLOW application) Saasonal Cabin plus a PRIVATE GUEST CABIN Other CONDITIONAL USE PLEASE VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION. If there'is an error or a change^ please mark the correction and return this page to the City In the enclosed postage- paid envelope. We want this permanent record to be correct. IF YOU WISH TO CHALLENGE THE RECORD LOT DETERMINATION AND/OR THE CLASSIFICATION OF YOUR PROPERTY, you must file a formal written appeal before July 1,1983 , or the record lot will remain classified as above. Sign below and return along with a separate letter stating the problem and facts supporting any change. Additional Information may be requested to verify any challenge such as surveys, utility bills, copies of recorded deeds, etc. Owner/Taxpayer Date Phone b Bl ■! I II * t' - • • • »• > i/;: ^ -*•.*>* City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _______________d Minnesota: APPROVING A LOT AREA VARIANCE POR RECORD LOT NO 8 PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 246, MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Hennepin County FINDINGS 1. That_ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (are) the owner(s)/tax payerfs) of record of the following described property located withi the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District of the City: For the legal description, see Exhibit A. 2. That in adoption of Ordinance No. 246, the City Council reviewe ownership, development and use patterns on the Islands and has detei mined that all the above described property combined is and shal hereinafter and henceforth be one "RECORD LOT" as defined in Sectic 10.31 of said ordinance. 3. That all the above described property when combined as one RECORD LC is still less tha the minimum lot size required for new lots in th RS District, but that this RECORD LOT is being used and/or may be use in the future for any permitted use in the RS District without advers affect upon public health, safety, or welfare. CONCLUSION The City Council of Orono hereby grants a lot area variance t the above described RECORD LOT based on the above findings and subject t the following conditions: 1. This RECORD LOT including all the above described property combine shall henceforth be continued in common ownership by the same perse or persons even if recorded as separate lots or tax parcels, and i shall not be subdivided, sold in parts, reduced in area or otherwi: separated without application for and approval of a subdivision by t) City. This condition shall not preclude future sale or transfer c the complete "RECORD LOT" as a single unit. 2. Granting this variance means this RECORD LOT may be used for one family seasonal recreational use without a structure; or a single n« seasonal dwelling may be built; or an existing seasonal dwelling m<- be used, improved, added-onto or replaced; all without requirir further City Council review of lot size, but subject to strict cor pliance with all building permit, setback, hardcover, on-site sewa< treatment and other performance standards for development in the I District. ..V » -.y., I V • *, •*. ' >• [. *v •5• \• • • « • ummj•<r.- City of OROIXO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________ PAGE 2; RECORD LOT NO. 8 : RESOLUTION NO. 3. Granting this variance shall not vest any rights in the property other than as specifically provided in Ordinance No. 246r and shall not preclude a future City Council from amending# modifying or otherwise limiting development rights and/or performance standards in the RS District. 4. The undersigned has read and und<?rstood the terms of this resolutior and on behalf of himself# his heirs# successors and assigns# agrees that the above described property constitutes a single RECORD LOT; agrees that the RECORD LOT use may be so limited by the City; anc agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. 19 __. ATTEST: Adopted by the Orono City Council on the day of Dorothy M. Hallin# City Cleric 0 Mary C. Butler# Mayor 1 (1) Property Owner(s)(2) STATE OP MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN) • On this day of # 198__# before me# a Notary Public within and for said County#personally appeared known tc me UU uc uiie w.w -- - - --- - - - ^ -- -sV »— ment# and acknov/ledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) fret act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES This document is being recorded for the benefit of the City o Orono per Minnesota Statutes 386.77. State Deed Tax Due Hereon: Exempt This instrument was drafted by; City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Exhibit A. That part of Lot B, Morse Island Park, lying south of a line running from a point 554 feet south of the northwest corner of lot B, to the northwest corner of Lot 38, Hennepin County, Minnesota r Application Date: 60 Day Deadline: Approved: 2/17/99 4/18/99 3/22/99 COUMrii. meeting APR I 2 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OH OhUi^ij DATE: 3/26/99 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Assistant Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2465 Robert D. and Lisa S. Erickson 364/372 Westlake Street Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Zoning District:LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre) Lot Area: (Existing)364 Westlake St. 372 Westlake St. 0.65 acre 2.01 acres Council Action: The Council approved a lot line reqarrangement for Bob and Lisa Erickson tor properties located at 364 and 372 Westlake Street on a unanimous vote of 4 to 0 at the March 22,1999 meeting. Staff was directed to draft a resolution to be adopted at the next meeting. Summary' of Request: 1.The applicants are owners of two properties located at 364 and 372 Westlake Street. They had proposed a Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement that results in two substandard lots. It is the intent of the applicants to build a home on the 372 lot and sell the 364 lot as a residential site. Both lots contain houses and a number of accessory buildings that would be removed prior to new home construction. 2.The Erickson's have agreed to deed a p>ortion of their property to the City for the east half of a future cul-de-sac at the end of Westlake Street. They have requested the City credit both properties for hardcover and structural coverage for the land deeded as they are offering to dedicate this property to the City at the request of Staff and the Planning Commission. 3.To close the portion of Westlake Street south of the proposed cul-de-sac. The applicants will be responsible for removing the existing road to be closed and accept 100% of the costs involved. The Erickson’s would also be responsible for landscaping and providing a pedistrian trail to the lake. Closing of the street would not include vacating the public access to Lake Minnetonka, nor change the "public" status of Westlake Street. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To approve or amend the enclosed resolution. Attachments A Notice of Council Action B Approval Resolution i CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 249-4600 ZONING FILE #2465 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION DATE OF NOTICE; 3/23/99 TO:Robert and Lisa Erickson 847 Tonkawa Road Long Lake. MN 55356 Mike Cronin 8809 West Bush Lake Road Bloomington, MN 55438 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Lot Line Rearrangement - Variances DATE OF MEETING:3/22/99 VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST 1. To approve a lot line rearrangement for lots located at 364 and 372 Westlake Street. 2. To approve variances for lot area and lot width on both lots, and an average lakeshore setback variance for 364 Westlake Street. 3. To close Westlake Street south of the cul-de-sac to the lake. Subject to the following conditions: 1.All structures located on the 372 Westlake Street parcel shall be removed prior to filing the subdivision. 2.The septic system located on the 372 Westlake Street parcel shall be abandoned and the new residence connect to sanitary sewer. 3.Easements shall be granted 10 feet along exterior property lines and 5 feet along interior property lines. 4. Deed shall be delivered to the City for east half of future cul-de-sac. 5. Title Opinions on both existing properties are required for filing subdivision. 6. A walkway shall be developed from the south end of the cul-de-sac to the lakeshore for local pedestrian traffic through the platted Westlake Street. A signage and landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by Staff for the closed portion of Westlake Street. If you desire certified copies of the official C'ty Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the City Council. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 364 AND 372 WESTLAKE STREET; GRANTING OF VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C) (6); AND CLOSING OF A PORTION OF WESTLAKE STREET FILE NO. 2465 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council lias considered the application for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement by Robert D. Erickson and Lisa S. Erickson (hereinafter "the subdividers") of properties legally described as: Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 1, Hillside Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, together with that part of the vacated alley adjoining said Lot 12 per Document No. 2711665, Hennepin County, Minnesota. to be rearranged by transferring a portion of Lots 10, 11 and 12 and vacated alley to Lot 9 described as: Exhibit "A" WHEREAS, After due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 15, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of the City for a subdivision to rearrange the property lines between 364 and 372 Westlake Street. Page 1 of 7 WHEREAS, The subdividers have offered to deed property to the City of Orono for the future development of a cul-de-sac at the South end of Westlake Street. WHEREAS, At their regular meeting held on March 22, 1999, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Robert D. and Lisa S. Erickson, noting the following fmdings of fact: 1. The property is located within the LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential District requiring a minimum of 2 acres lot area. The existing lots are as follows: 364 Westlake Street 372 Westlake Street 0.65 acres 2.01 acres 2. The subdividers have proposed a lot line rearrangement creating two substandard lots and deeding to the City property for the east half of a future cul-de-sac. The lots are as follows: 364 Westlake Street 372 Westlake Street Deeded Right-of-Way 1.44 acres 1.20 acres 0.03 acres 3. The proposed lots require variances for lot area and lot width because they are undersized for the zoning district. 4. The northern lot, 364 Westlake Street, requires a variance for average lakeshore setback, as it is not possible to construct a new residence without encroaching into the average lakeshore setback. 5. The subdividers have offered to deed property for the eastern portion of a future cul-de-sac at the southern end of Westlake Street. 6. It is intended to develop the cul-de-sac in the future outside of the 75' lakeshore setback, thus reducing the length of Westlake Street. The subdividers have agreed, at their expense, to remove the portion of Westlake Street south of the platted cul-de-sac to Stubbs Bay of Lake Minnetonka. Page 2 of 7 7. As a result of deeding land for the cul-de-sac, at the request of Staff and the Planning Commission for emergency vehicle turnaround, the subdividers shall be credited for lot area as it relates to lot coverage by structure and hardcover as if the cul-de-sac had not been created. The lots shall be allowed the following: 364 Westlake Street Lot Coverage by Structure , dlowed Hardcover 75-250' setback 9,567 s.f. 9,616 s.f. 372 Westlake Street Lot Coverage by Structure Allowed Hardcover 75-250' setback 7,926 s.f. 7,333 s.f. 8. A non-conforming septic system and drainfield are located on the 372 Westlake Street parcel. In 1996, previous property owners were required to abandon the system and connect to sanitary sewer. All assessments for the sewer project have been paid on the lot, however, at the time a new residence is constructed the property owner(s) will be required to pay a SAC fee and abandon the existing septic system. 9. The principal residence located on the 372 Westlake Street property is required to be removed prior to filing the subdivision as it is located on the newly created property line. All other buildings, including cabins, shall be removed by the subdivider. 10. The City ..‘ sed ‘.L-division proposal for the 372 property, however the Subdivision was k because the proposed development would have created two substandard lots from a conforming lot. Staff recommended the property owner attempt to acquire an additional lot, not to increase density. The subdividers have purchased the lot to the north (364 Westlake) to allow a lot line rearrangement without creating new residential sites and increasing density. 11. Removal of the residences and cabins will decrease the overall "dwelling units" on the properties from 4 to 2. Page 3 of 7 i 12. Platting of a cul-de-sac on Westlake Street has eliminated the need for the southern portion of Westlake Street. The Council, at the request of the subdivider, has determined it is appropriate to close the portion of Westlake Street south of the platted cul-de-sac. Most of the existing paved Westlake Street to be closed is within the 75' lakeshore setback. It is the intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan to protect the v/ater quality of Lake Minnetonka as well as downstream flood zones along Minnehaha Creek. Removal of the bituminous surface will assist in meeting the intent of the Comprehensive Plan by allowing storm water to be absorbed into the soil rather than running over hardcover directly into the lake. 13. The closing of Westlake Street south of the platted cul-de-sac will not change the "public" status of the undeveloped Westlake Street. It is the position of the City these platted access areas to the lake remain as they are beneficial to the localities especially to property owners without riparian rights. 14. The subdivider is owner of property located at 365 Westlake Street. Access to the property will be from the cul-de-sac. Curb cut to the cul-de-sac shall be approved by the Director of Public Services. 15. Granting variances for lot area and lot width, and an average lakeshore setback variance for the northern lot, shall be granted. The Council waives the one year time period for variances and creates two "RECORD LOTS". Building plans conforming to the standards set forth in the zoning chapter and/or conforming to the conditions established by this resolution shall not require further Council review. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Orono hereby approves the lot line rearrangement of the above referenced property by the subdividers as shown on the certificate of survey by John K. Barnes, a licensed surveyor of Sunde Land Surveying, LLC, dated February 18, 1999 and revised March 17, 1999, attached Exhibit "B", and grants variances to Municipal Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit both newly created lots to be "RECORD LOTS" and are granted variances from the zoning chapter requirements for lot area and lot width; and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6) to permit an Average Lakeshore Setback variance for the northern lot (364 Westlake Street); and to close Westlake Street south of the platted cul-de-sac. The approval is subject to the following conditions: Page 4 of 7 1. The new legal description for Parcels A and B, as shown on the survey sited above, shall read as follows: Exhibit "A" 2. The existing legal descriptions are as follows: 364 Westlake Street Lot 9, Block 1, Hillside Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota 372 Westlake Street Lots 10, 11 and 12, Block 1, Hillside Park together with that part of the vacated Alley adjoining said Lot 12 per Document No. 2711665, Hennepin County, Minnesota 3. New drainage and utility easements as follows: Parcel A and B Exhibit "C" 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Variances shall be granted creating "RECORD LOTS" for Parcels A and B. The septic system located on Parcel A (372 Westlake Street) shall be abandoned and the property connect to sanitary sewer. All structures located on the existing 372 Westlake Street parcel shall be removed prior to filing the subdivision. The subdividers shall remove that portion of closed Westlake Street and submit a landscape and development plan acceptable to Staff. The plan shall include a trail to be developed by the subdividers from the cul-de-sac to the lake, including landscaping. The plan shall allow for pedestrian and non-automobile traffic. Standard Drainage and Utility Easements shall be shown on the survey along lot lines. Page 5 of 7 9.The aforesaid division shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before April 12, 2000 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. 10. The City of Orono shall not issue a building permit for improvements to either of the new parcels prior to recording the subdivision. 11. The approval granted by mis resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, a new application shall be required for the City of Orono review. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) Title Opinions addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The subdivider must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. Copies of Certificate of Survey for filing with Hennepin County. d) Legal descriptions of new lots, drainage and utility easements and deeded cul-de- sac. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota this 12th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Page 6 of 7 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of April, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public 4 4 Page 7 of 7 L « j 1 ft A ftExhibit "A PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL A That part of Lots 10, il and 12, Block I, HILLSIDE PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof; together with that part of the vocated Alley adjoining said Lot 12 per Document No, 2711665, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west of a line described os commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 10; thence on on assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 57 minutes 07 seconds East, along the north line of said Lot 10, a distance of 307,00 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence on a bearing of South to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and said line there terminating. Except that part of said Lot 10, lying northwesterly of o curve concave to the west hoving o radius of 40 feet. Said curve passes through the northwest corner of Lot 9, said Block I, HILLSIDE PARK and passes through a point on the westerly line of said Lot 10 distant 74.16 feet south from said northwest corner of Lot 9. The center of said curve is on the center line of Westlake Street as dedicated in said plat. PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR PARCFI. R Lot 9 and that part of Lots 10, II and 12, Block I, HILLSIDE PARK, according to the recorded plot thereof; together with thot part of the vacated Alley adjoining soid Lot 12 per Document No. 2711665, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying east of o line described as commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 10; thence on on assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 57 minutes 07 seconds East along the north line of said Lot 10 o distance of 307.00 feet to the point of beginning of soid line to be described; thence on a bearing of South to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and said line there terminating. Except that part of said Lot 9, lying westerly of a curve concave to the west having a radius of 40 feet. Soid curve passes through the northwest corner of said Lot 9, and passes through a point on the westerly line of Lot 10, said Block I, HILLSIDE PARK distant 74.16 feet south from said northwest corner of Lot 9. The center of said curve Is on the center line of Westlake Street as dedicated in said plat. PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIPTION That part of Lots 9 and 10, Block I, HILLSIDE PARK, according to the recorded plot thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of o curve concave to the west having a radius of 40 feet. Said curve passes through .the northwest corner of said Lot 9, ond passes through a point on the westerly line of said Lot 10 distant 74.16 feet south from said northwest corner of Lot 9. The center of said curve is on the center lir.-i of Westlake Street as dedicated in said plat. 1 llrillExhibit "C DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER PARCFI A The westerly and northwesterly lO feet and the northerly and easterly 5 feet of the following described property: ^ That part of Lots 1 0, II and 1 2, Block I, HILLSIDE PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, together with that part of the vacated Alley adjoining sold Lot 1 2 per Document No. 2711 665, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west of a line described as commencing at the northwest corner of sold Lot ID; thence on an assurned bearing of North 89 degrees 57 minutes 07 seconds East, along the north line of said Lot ID, a distance of 307.00 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described, thence on a bearing of South to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and said line there terminaUng, Except that part of said Lot lO, lying westerly of a curve concave to the west having a radius of 40 feet. Sold curve passes through the northwest corner of Lot 9, said Block I, HILLSIDE PARK and passes through a point on the westerly line of said Lot lO distant 74.1 6 feet south from the northwest corner of said Lot 9. The center of said curve is on the center line of Westlake Street os dedicated in said plat. DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER PARCFI R The westerly lO feet of that part of Lot 9, Block I, HILLSIDE PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of a curve concave to the west hoving o radius of 40.00 feet. Said curve passes through the northwest corner of said Lot 9, end passes through o point on the westerly line of Lot lO, said Block I, HILLSIDE PARK, distont 74.1 6 feet south from the said northwest corner of Lot 9. The center of sold curve is on the center line of Westlake Street cs dedicated in said plat. Together with the northerly 5 feet of that port of said Lot 9 lying easterly of the above described curve. Together with a 5 foot strip over Lots 9, lO, II, 1 2, soid Block I, and the vacated Alley adjoining said Lot 1 2 per Document No. 271 1 665, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly and easterly and adjoining a line described as beginning at the intersection of the south line of said Lot 9 and the above described curve; thence on on assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 57 minutes 07 seconds East, along the south line of said Lot 9, a distance of 284.1 0 feet to a point 307.00 feet east of said southwest corner of Lot 9; thence on o bearing of South to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and said line there terminating. * . w Date of Application: 2J\1I99 Date Complete: 21X1 W 60 day limit: 4/17/99 couNcn. MFtrriNG REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Cl rv ur vnuj^u ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Liz Van Zomeren Title City Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2466 James R. Renckens and John B. Winston 3020 Watertown Road Two Lot Preliminary Plat Subdivision Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Lot Area:11,94 acres total, 10.1 dry acres Application: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 11.94 acre parcel into two lots. The rear lot, Lot 1, is considered a flag lot and is subject to backlot standards that require 150% of the lot area, front, rear, and side yard setbacks. There are several issues with the application as follows: 1. The dedication of right-of-way for Watertown Road; 2. The lot design for Lot 1 to have 30’ of frontage on Watertown Road instead of a platted outlot; 3. The temporary cul-de-sac in the Crystal Creek to the west and the expectation that Crystal Creek Road, a private road, would be extended by platting a 50' outlot to the east in order for a connection to Wear Lane (public road) or another road to be created in the future. Lot 7 in Crystal Creek has a 15' easement over Lot 6 from the temporary cul-oe-sac. 4. The location of a stormwater management pond in the Crystal Creek subdivision that impacts the proposed location for a septic site on the front lot. Lot 2. An administrative variance from the septic rules may be needed. 5. The need for a stormwater management pond to be located north of the larger wetland. Dice of Applicttion: 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60 day limit; 4/17/99 6. The possiblity of future subdivision of the larger lot, Lot 2, and possible access from the temporary cul-de-sac vs. a platted 50 ’ outlot. 7. The amormt of land required to be dedicated or used for ponding: Watertown Road 15,183.63 sq. ft. Access Outlot 10,680 sq. ft Stormwater Pond 8,713 sq. ft. TOTAL: 57,329.13 sq. ft. (1.3 acres) PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended that the subdivider provide a 50' outlot across the rear property line of Lot 2 and also provide a 30' outlot for Lot 2 instead of a flag lot design, subject to City staff granting an administrative variance for the location of a septic site on Lot 1. The subdivider has prepared a response to the Planning Commission's recommendation in Exhibit B. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; To review the proposed subdivision and subdivider's response and provide direction to the subdivider regarding the requested outlets from Watertown Road and from Cry.4al Creek Road. No resolution has been prepared as the subdivider did not agree with the Planning Commission's recommendation. Attachments A Proposed Plat with PC recommendations B Letter from applicant C Notice of Planning Commission action D Staff letter to applicant E City Engineer’s letter F Planning Commission staff report 1(2466 Rtnekens 3020 Watertown Rd. ccmim Filename: Uz/co2466 r James R. R enckens s 4680 Forestview Lane Plymouth, Minnesota SS442 (612) 559-2380 April 2,1999 Elizabeth Van Zomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator Orono City Hall 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Re; James R. Renckens Class III Preliminary Plat Subdivision Zoning File No. 2466 Dear Ms. Van Zomeren: On March 15, 1999, the Orono Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat proposed by my wife and me. The Commission's approval was made subject to three conditions. Those conditions, and our responses to each, are as follows. 1. Provide 50' Outlot across north property line. We have chosen not to incorporate the recommended change into the preliminary plat that will be proposed to the C*ty Council on April 12. We have a number of reasons for objecting to the 50' Outlot requirement, flease bear with us as we try to explain. First, creating a 50' Outlot along the entire Northerly property line makes it much more likely that a street will be constructed within the Outlot area. The construction of a street along the North property line would deprive our property of the privacy it now enjoys, and, for that reason alone, the property is less desirable and thus less valuable. Apart from value considerations, there are issues of safety and security. These considerations are adversely affected by the creation of a city street, which, in addition to providing undesired access to our property, would serve as its primary purpose to make other properties situated to the North and East more accessible. With that increase in accessibility also comes more traffic and the resulting loss of privacy, safety and security. Creation of the 50' Outlot also raises issues with respect to fairness and the public interest. The neighbors to our East in the Wear Lane neighborhood, as well as our neighbors to the West in the Crystal Creek neighborhood, are strongly opposed to the creation of such an access street. With respect to providing access to the North, the City could not have been clearer in stating its written condition to the developer of the Crystal Creek subdivision when it declared in Resolution No.3896 dated May 12,1997 approving the Crystal Creek subdivision: Ms. Elizabeth Van Zomeren April 2, 1999 Page 2 7. Outlet B may be residentially developed in the future ___The subdivider shall be responsible for providing legal access to the property___ The subdivider, in accepting the City’s plat approval, also accepted the above-stated condition, and io reasonably and legally bound to honor it now. Furthermore, there remains ample opportunity for the subdivider to acquire land to the East, and thereby obtain access to his property from Old Crystal Bay Road. That task is his responsibility, as stated in Resolution No. 3896, not the City's, and certainly not ours. If land is to be taken from any property to serve the subdivider's Outlet B, it should be taken from the subdivider's own subdivision, which, in this case, would be Lots 6 and 7 of Block 1, Crystal Creek. That would be eminently more fair than taking the land from us, especially since the subdivider profited from the creation of those Lots 6 and 7. The subdivider has caused his own problem, and should be responsible for its solution. Please do not make us solve it. Our next objection is based on the loss of acreage that we would suffer from the taking of the Outlot. The creation of a 50' Outlot across the Northerly boundary of our property results in a loss of 22,752.5 square feet of land, or somewhat more than one-half acre. That loss of acreage, not to mention the loss of acreage resulting from other Planning Commission suggestions, makes it much less likely that the Northerly lot could be subdivided into two lots in the future, especially in view of the City's 150% requirements for back lots. Zoning District RR-IB standards require two acres of dry buildable area. Therefore, the minimum area for each such lot would need to be 150% of that acreage, or three dry acres. With the taking of the Outlot, there is barely enough land to accommodate two lots of th^ acres each, and this situation is exacerbated because we cannot divide the property on an equal 50/50 basis because of the topography and existing natural conditions. This is truly a significant problem for us. When we purchased the property we expected, and we think reasonably so, that we would have several subdivision alternatives for it in view of the acreage. However, after consulting with different surveyors, a land planner, the septic designer, as well as our architect and builder, we have concluded that, as a result of terrain and wetlands, there are just two building sites in the Northern part of the property. All other alternatives would require the removal of the precious stand of pine trees, as well as substantial clearing and considerable, and expensive, alteration of the natural amenities. Another significant reason for our opposition to the 50' Outlot is that its creation takes away critical septic sites in the Northeast comer of the property. While these septic sites are not shown on our proposed subdivision, they are shown on an earlier application proposed by John Vogt and Mike Hilbelink. The City's talcing of the 50' Outlot and the septic sites located there prevents us from situating our house in that area, which is our first and best choice for the location of our home. A furtlier rei^on we oppose the Outlot is that there does not seem to be any good reason to require it in the first place, except, as I have heard, and to quote one of the members of the Planning Commission, "it would be nice to have". To quote another member of the Planning Commission, "if we don't take this opportunity to get the Outlot, we may never have another opportimity." Ms. Elizabeth Van Zomeren April 2,1999 Pages The taking of the Outlet, or the imposition of the Outlet requirement on this plat, is apparently based on that part of the City’s Ordinances found in Section 11.32, Subdivision 2.B.6., where the following language is found: ... proposed roadv= ays shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be subdivided___ However, the foregoing language is qualified by two exceptions; one exception applying where topography or other physical conditions mitigate against the extension of the roadway, and another exception allowing the City to make a judgment call that the extension is not "necessary or desirable for the coordination of the layout of the subdivision. ..." Both exceptions are applicable in this instance. The extension of the roadway is in fact prevented by physical conditions, in this case trees and topography, and the layout is not necessary or desirable for the coordination of the layout of this subdivision wth adjoining subdivisions. Moreover, no roadway whatsoever is proposed with respect to this subdivision. While a driveway could be located off of Crystal Creek Road, and while a driveway location is proposed from Watertown Road next to the proposed Lot 2, no “roadway” is proposed. That being the case, paragraph 6 of the Ordinance is not applicable. Instead, paragraph 4 of the same Subdivision 2 is applicable, which reads as follows: Roadways shall be laid out to conform as much as possible to the topography, to discourage use bv through traffic, to permit efficient drainage and utility systems, and to require the minimum number of roadways necessary to provide convenient and safe access to property. (Emphasis added.) In view of our objections to the Outlot, and since both the Wear Lane and Crystal Creek neighborhoods also oppose creation of the Outlot, the City Council's focus should be on the language of the above-quoted paragraph 4, and particularly the words "to discourage use by through traffic". Our final reason for opposing the creation of the Outlot is that the City’s taking of this Outlot acreage amounts to a condemnation thereof because the taking is unrelated to the two-lot subdivision of the tract. While the taking may accommodate future public works with respect to properties to the West, North and East, and while the property to the North would surely benefit from and be enriched by access over the Outlot, none of that is related to the two-lot subdivision that we propose. In view of the taking of the Outlot, and because no compensation for the taking is proposed, the constitutionality of the Planning Commission’s recommendation must be challenged. The sanctity of private property is well recognized under our laws. While private property may be taken for a goverrunental purpose, just compensation must be paid. The only justifiable reason that this property is being taken is for perceived municipal uses at some future date, which municipal uses have nothing whatsoever to do with the two-lot subdivision proposed by us at this time. Accordingly, our final reason for opposing the taking of the Outlot is that it would be unconstitutional to do so. Ms. Elizabeth Van Zomeren April 2,1999 Page 4 2. Provide 30' access Outlot for back lot instead of "flag lot” design. We also oppose the 30’ Outlot suggested by the Planning Commission for reasons similar to those noted in our opposition to the Northerly Outlot. We oppose the creation of this Outlot because it removes critical acreage that could be credited to a subsequent division of Lot 1 to the North. The loss of area that results from the creation of this Outlot would be 10,680 square feet, or approximately one-quarter acre. Notwithstanding the size of the lot, in the event of a ftirther subdivision we run up against the three-acre minimum and site limitations previously mentioned. Thus, we need every square foot we can muster to satisfy the required acreage minimums. Another reason we oppose the creation of this Outlot is that tliere does not appear to be good reason to require it. Our understanding from conversations with City Staff is that historically this type of flag lot was opposed only when lakeshore was involved. However, that is not the case here. Further, with the potential for access to Lot 1 at its Northwest comer by way of an easement over Crystal Creek Road, there was even some question in Staffs mind, as expressed at the Planning Commission hearing, as to whether an Outlot should be recommended in this situation. Therefore, because the historic reason for opposing a flag lot is not present here, because there does not appear to be clear direction from Staff requiring the establishment of an Outlot, and because creation of an Outlot adversely affects subsequent acreage computations with respect to a possible subdivision of the rear lot, the creation of this meaningless Outlot at the front is opposed. 3. City Staff to grant administrative variances for septic location, if appropriate. This requirement of the Planning Commission is not opposed. The requirement is advantageous to us, and is accepted. We will work with Staff to address this matter. Thank you for this additional opportunity to address these matters. Sincerely, Jim and Debra Renckens JRR/ldd CITY OF ORONO F.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PHONE:(612)249-4600 FAX: (612)249-4616 ZONING FILE #2466 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE; March 16, 1999 TO:James Renckens 4680 Forestview Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55442 COPIES TO: John Winston 4420 IDS Center 80 S. 8th St. Mpls.,MN 55402 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 3/15/99 VOTE:5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below. 1. Provide 50' outlot across north property line. 2. Provide 30' access outlot for back lot instead of "flag lot" design. 3. City staff to grant administrative variances for septic location, if appropriate. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council April 12, 1999, meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. X:\APPS\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\CAROLE\PCACnONa4«6 D CrrYoT CHtONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 n James Renckens 4680 Forestview Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55442 John Winston 4420 IDS Center 80 S. 8th St. Mpls.,MN 55402 Re: Class III Preliminary Plat Subdivision #2466 I am writing to inform you that you have thirty (30) days from the date of Planning Commission action (March 15, 1999) to incorporate the required changes prior to review by the Citv Council. The thirty day period will end on April 15, 1999. If you choose to incorporate the changes that were recommended by the Planning Commission, 15 copies of the preliminary plat shall be filed within the thirty day period and at least 10 days before the City Council meeting. If you choose to refuse to incorporate the changes, you shall provide in writing your reasons addressed to the Zoning Administrator within the thirty day period and at least 10 days prior to review by the City Council. The City Council meets the second and fourth Mondays of the month, April 12th and 24th. If you have questions about this process, please call me at 249-4623. Sincerely, A 2,-—• Elizabeth Van Zomeren City Plaimer/Zoning Administrator EVZ/ch Telei • /11 • i • I -(612)473-7357 • FAX 4734)510 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Sc'-estroo, AncerUk ana Assoeistes. Inc. is an Affirmative Action, equ3l Oppcru^ity employer P^ rcioatt Oc:c G. 3onesiroo. P£. • Joseph C. Anderiik. PE • Marvin L. Sorvaia. PE. • ffic-ard E Turre*. PE • GJenn R Cook. PE • Robert G Schumcnt. PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. P6. • Robert W Rosere. p£ and Susan M. Eberim. C PA . Senior Consultants ^:scciJite Prirc 0^15 Howard A Sanford. PE. • Keith A. Gordon. PE. • Robert R. PE. • R :-'ard 'Ji/ fa:tr ?£ • David O Loskota. PE. • Robert C. Russek. A.I A • Mark A. Hanson. PE. • Vicnaei T. Rau:“*ann. PE • Ted K field. PE. • Kenneth P. Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolfs. PE. • S-cre/ P Wiiiiar-son. PE . L S • Robert f Kotsmuh • Agnes M. Ring • Michael P Rau. PE • A.;ar Rick Schrr.sr. PE Engineers & Architects March 8, 1999 :*s St Pju Rochester. 'JViiimar and St Cloud. MN • Milviraukee. W! JftSiire wvw.voorestroo com Elizabc-iii Vc: Zomeren City rianner/'. toning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 fi-------- Q^re»)t , AC. “ Re:Renckens Subdivision File No. 139-2466 Dear Liz: We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed two-lot Renckens subdivision. The site is located east of Crystal Creek Road, west of Wear Lane and north of Watertown Road in the southwest quarter of Section 33. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1.Access: Access to Lot 1 is off of Watertown Road along a 30-foot wide corridor. The driveway to serve Lot 1 would be approximately 700 feet long. The City should review the proposed access to Lot 1 and determine whether the 30-foot corridor and driveway length is appropriate. The southerly 33 feet of Lot 2 should be dedicated as Watertown Road right-of-way. An Outlot should be platted across the northerly 50-feet of Lot I to provide for a future extension of Crystal Creek Road and allow access to Outlot B and Lot 7, Block lin the Crystal Creek subdivision. Grading: The location of the proposed westerly septic site on Lot 2 may be too close to the proposed driveway to serve Lot 1 and to the existing wetland in Crystal Creek. A grading a.-'d erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any grading. Additional erosion control will be needed during construction of the homes and septic systems. Drainage: The site lies within the Lake Classen drainage district as shown in the draft version of the City's Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP). The southerly wetland on the property is identified as LC-P15 and classified as a moderately susceptible wetland in the City's SWMP. We recommend constructing a water quality pond roiut of this wetland to treat runoff from the site and protect th' wetland. -The City^s SWMP also idgntificra pf tosed 18'^ slut 111 sewet Luit»eying flews from the nnrihrast tn this pnnrUwctland area. We recommend that a (Mirtagc eosement be acquired at this time for future eowotniction of this storm sewer-. A drainage area map. drainage and ponding calculations should be submitted for review. Plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Vatershed District for their review. 4.Easements: Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of -ways. Drainage easements should be provided across ponding areas, wedands and drainage ways. 5. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we will prepare an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. Please contact me at 651-604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gappa. City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651-636*4600 • Fax; 651-636-1311 Date of Application/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 120 day limit: 6/17/99 TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: RE: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/ Zoning Administrator March 2,1999 #2466 John B. Winston/James R. Renckens, having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road Class II Subdivision-Two Lot Preliminary Subdivision Exhibits: A1 Application AA Notice to previous applicants A2 Legal Description AC Septic Report A3 Applicant's lette AD Previous Proposed Plat B Proposed Plat Survey BA Historical Information C Area Map Ca Road and Topo for Crystal Creek Cl Plat Map Cb Res. #2948 C2 &3 Mailing List Cc Exhibit A for Res. #2498 Cd Staff Report for Crystal Creek Ce Engineer's letter Cf Res. #3896 Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Comprc •* .nsive Plan: Rural Service/R.ural Residential District Lot Area: 11.94 acres total, 10.1 dry acres #2466 Winston/Renckens 3020 Watertown Road PC-3/15/99 page~l t Date of Application/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 120 day limit: 6/17/99 Proposed Lots: Lot Total acreage Total dry acreage Lot 1 8.43 acres 7.30 acres Lot 2 3.51 acres 2.73 acres Application: The applicants are proposing to subdivide an 11.94 acre parcel into two lots. Lot 1 is considered a flag lot, subject to back lot standards. Lot 2 is a front lot. Both lots 1 and 2 are proposed to have access onto Watertown Road. RR-IB Standards Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Street 2 acres dry buildable 200'50'50'30'50' Back Lot Standards Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Street 3 acres 200'75'75'45'75' The proposed subdivision is located in the RRl-B zoning district. The minimum lot area for the zoning district is 2 acres. Backlots require a minimum of 3 acres. Lot 1 is a flag lot back lot. Lot 1 is required to meet the above back lot standards which are 150% of the requirements for the RR- 1B district for lot area, front, rear and side yards. #2466 Winston/Renckens 3020 Watertown Road PC-3/15/99 page-2 i Date of Application/17/99 Date Complete; 2/17/99 120 day limit: 6/17/99 The subdivision ordinance states that front/back lot subdivisions shall not be created. In Section 11.31, Subd. 5, it states "Front/back lot subdivisions. "Flag lots" and "easement back lots" shall not be created. Front/back lot divisions shall be allowed only in conjunction with the creation of an outlot to provide access from the back lot to the public or private road. Such outlot shall not be allowed as creditable lot area for either the back or front lots. Front/back lots shall adhere to the following standards: a. b. Front/back lot divisions may be used when existing property dimensions are narrow and deep, such that lot widA does not allow for a side-by-side lot split, but acreage is adequate to provide a front lot and back lot without requiring an area variance when the area of the outlot access corridor is excluded. The area to be subdivided is 11.94 acres with 1.91 acres wet. There is sufficient land area for 5 building sites in the 2 acre zoning district. The parcel, however, does not have 1,000ft. of frontage for 5 lots to meet the minimum lot width on a public street. The depth of the parcel is 1,170 ft. which would provide adequate lot width if the lots were platted in an east/west orientation. However, a mw private north/south road platted at 50' right-of-way would be required along the east or west boundary line. The amount of lot area dedicated to a private road would reduce the total number of building sites and would cause either the lots in either Crystal Creek or along Wear Lane to technically become through lots. There are also not enough adequate primary and secondary septic sites to accommodate such a platting arrangement. Front/back lot divisions may be used for individual lot splits, but may not be used when subdividing a large parcel into numerous lots if creation of a back lot is merely a convenience to the developer rather than supported by unique site factors. The topography and location of the wetlands reduces the likelihood of a three or four lot subdivision laid cut along i north/south private road. A back lot/Jront lot for this parcel may be accomplished without lot area variances. Lot 2 cannot be further subdivided. Lot 1 could be further subdivided if adequate septic sites and access is provided in accordance with City codes. U2466 Wimton/Renckens 3020 Watertown Road PC-3/15/99 page-3 Date of Application/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 120 day limit: 6/17/99 Accessory Structures Lot 2 would be platted to have the existing five accessory buildings. The maximum total square footage for a 3.51 acre lot is 3,200 sq. ft. The five accessory structures total 3,208 square feet of lot coverage as calculated by staff. The actual total structural coverage of the accessory structures needs to be verified. If the lot coverage exceeds 3,200 sq. ft., either one of the buildings needs to be removed to meet the requirement or a variance will be needed. One building measures approximately 32' x 44' (1,408 sq. ft.), and is considered an oversized accessory structure. Oversized accessory structures are subject to setback requirements that are required to be filed in a covenant in the chain of title. The plat as proposed would not comply with the side yard adjacent to street (45') setback if the 30' flag lot is replatted as a 30' access outlot, as required by the subdivision ordinance. Historical Building The April 1997 inventory from the Minnesota State Historical Office notes a bam at 3020 Watertown Road listed as HE-ORC-029 in the standing stmcture inventory. The state information is included in Exhibit BA. Septic Systems Steve Weckrnan has evaluated the proposed septic locations. His report is in Exhibit G. In the report he notes that the location of a stormwater pond in Crystal Creek results in a septic site for Lot 1 (formerly Lot 3) on Watertown Road being located only 58 feet from the pond where 75 feet is required. A variance for the location of the drainfield will be required. Park Dedication Fee The Park Commission has reviewed this proposed subdivision and has reconunended accepting a park dedication fee in lieu of land. The Hennepin County Assessor has been asked to review the proposal and determine the fair market value of the undeveloped land. U2466 Winston/Renckens 3020 Watertown Road PC-3/15/99 page~4 Date of Application/I 7/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 120 day limit: 6/17/99 Engineering Issues The City Engineer has provided a letter addressing several engineering issues such as access, stormwater management, grading and drainage for the previous 3 lot subdivision. He is reviewing the two-lot proposal. Dedication of Right-of-way Access to both lots is from Watertown Road. The south 33'ofthe parcel should be dedicated as right-of-way on the final plat. Access The City's subdivision ordinance limits the length of a cul-de-sac to 1,000 feet and the number of units to be served at 10. Crystal Creek Road was built with a temporary cul-de-sac to serve 11 properties at a length of 1,400 feet. Therefore, tliis parcel cannot gain access from Crystal Creek Road. Both lots are proposed to have frontage and access from Watertown Road. The Code requires that the 30' portion of the back lot. Lot 1, be platted as an outlot, 30' wide, with a driveway at least 10' from either lot line. The side yard adjacent to an access lot standard is 45' rather than 30'. Future access to an additional lot created from the back lot would also be required to be provided from the access outlot. No access from Crystal Creek Road shall be allowed. Cul-de-sacs The subdivision ordinance states that cul-de-sacs shall be discouraged. (Section 11.32, Subd. 2, B. 6). Proposed roadways shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be subdivided, unless prevented by topography or other physical conditions or unless in the opinion of the City such extension is not necessary or desirable for the coordination of the layout of the subdivision witli the existing layout or the most advantageous future development of future tracts. This parcel is adjacent to the cul-de-sac for Crystal Creek In considering this two lot subdivision, the Planning Commission and City Council should address whether a 50' outlot shall be required across the rear of Lot 1 in order to coordinate the layout of adjacent subdivisions. H2466 Winston/Renckens 3020 Watertown Road PC-3/15/99 page-5 Date of Application/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 120 day limit: 6/17/99 Construction of Roads The subdivision ordinance states that the arrangement of streets shall provide for continuation of streets between adjacent propertie* when such continuation is necessary for convenient movement of traffic, effective fire protection, for efficient provision of utilities and where such continuation is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If the adjacent property is undeveloped and the street must be a dead-end street temporarily, the right-of-way shall be extended to the property line. The City may limit the length of temporary dead-end streets in accordance with the design standards. It was anticipated that Crystal Creek Road would eventually be connected to Wear Lane, according to a recent discussion with Jeanne Mabusth, former Zoning Administrator/Building Official. (See Crystal Creek packet for staff reports and resolutions). Stormwater Management % The City Engineer is reviewing the subdivision for stormwater management concerns. Drainage and Utility Easements The City will require the subdivider to provide standard utilit) and drainage easements along the internal and external lot lines. Drainage and flowage easements will also be required for wetland protection. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission needs to discuss the following issues: 1. Whether to accept platting of a back lot given the width of the parcel, wetlands, topography, and access 2. The proposed access to the back lot via a flag lot configuration vs. the Code requirement for a 30' access outlot 3. Future possible subdivision of Lot 1 and future access to the lot 4. The Code's requirement to consider the adjacent subdivisions and the need to create a 50' outlot across the rear of Lot 1 #2466 Winston/Renckens 3020 Watertown Road PC-3/15/99 page —6 A/ttiC AVCVCAfCU A, Amount Paid "?^Cr CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Property Identification Number (PID) 33 MS ^ 33 QQQL Please check one - Property ____abstract or ____torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT . ^ i Name (S VJ) N^0\I City ^ ^trgn Zip Phone (home) Phone (vflprk) 3^ 1 -^^00 5R (ifditicrent man appiicam; ^ ^ ^ UV^/E'MUUICSd —I vv — » —— —KJ. City (attach list if more than one) MO* Phone (home) ZinSWlPhone fworic) ^ I ^ EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Deyelopment Size Present use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of unitff___[_ Other (specify)_________ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Diyision for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) 2 Subdiyision for New Building Sites ■1 Number of Building Sites I I 2^ ExistHig Units Neu'Units Total Units 'S ■! * Vi Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check)2 Units per /'Z^ Acres Sq. FL Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) . _______ EXHIBIT A (Entire Tract) A n That part of the South 1170 feet, as measured along the West line thereof, of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Sertion 33, Township 118, Range 23, lying East of the West 869 feet thereof, as measured along the South line thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to Watertown Road. ' i r WINSTON LAW OFFICE A February 16, 1999 Ft BY MESSENGER Elizabeth Van Zomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator Orono City Hall 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Eceweo fte ' 6 or OHONO RE: James R. Renckens' Application for Two-Lot Subdivision; 3020 Watertown Roaa Dear Liz: Enclosed are our application for a two-lot subdivision of 3020 Watertown Road, a check in the amount of $350.00 to pay the subdivision application fee, and a legal description to the entire tract. The preliminary plat and recluctions thereof are coming from iMark Gronberg. They wiW be delivered to your office by Mark's office. You already have the septic/drain field information from the prior application (No. 2449), and you should also have the address list from that prior application. If there is anything more you need from me, please call. I will March 15 ill plan on appearing before the Planning Commission on Monday, , 1999. Thank you for your help. BW:lms Enclosure cc: Jim Renckens (448-7788) ^.•7 \ .V' ■■ /i r<3^ A , ............ -• C.—1X1 o 4420 IDS Center, 80 South 8th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel: 612/341-9800 Fax: 612/338-6351 iiTMiiiaiyf'i; h- < >-cn < Ld q: CL '. i '■Vi 4 i. I ^ ••o Csl ••• • MQ SO I***** cl <3 !; : •M « •B p* Tl •>• *1 M »V.i«iK«)4St m >J 5 ....^ 1 «. *■ 5 i ’t (?) (20..... •Ui f m CM £ </> lUM s 0U «C'N♦ p1 Ul 8 SS lyKU si 8RmmliSg.i «s35 8 u u & gM »3 ^1;;CM K M IIIi inin inm fH fO M in •• O -J i III ■t SM < Jim sixsiss r4 H I 90^ m cn lii in III iH C/I isi BBS, iH ^ u u 5 _ m < < $ 9 *0 Sm 1/1 I/I CM o « S K K S 8»o o u u n S m m ti <Hi M oeS1« s §2«< ae < Ul a. |M a- Ssisia. 5 H C s 8 > X ii So.U USBdSSS M m a®M)m S IS M Ul Ulh $8 1%^. e .1 Hi sss 8^ o s X X ae as a IH ■» I I M 1 nferma-h irr> ‘.J - L CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #2449 NOTICE OF PLANNING CO’.iMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 1/20/99 TO:Mike Hilbelink 85 Golden View Dr. Long Lake, MN 55356 John Vogt 2755 Copper View Long Lake, MN 55356 COPIES TO: Alan Carlson Charles Cudd Co. Jerry & Lorraine Goodwald John Winston Mark & Laura Summers Steve Kahler Rick Carlson Mark Supalla TYPE OF APPLICATION:Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 1/19/99 VOTE:5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions. Dale Lindquist moved to approve with conditions: 1. There is to be an outlot 50' wide along the north edge of the parcel with a cul-de-sac platted at 100'. 2.Accessory structures will be removed. The historical significance of the structure listed on the state's inventory will be researched by the City Planner. 3.Variance to allow the septic site for Lot 3 to be located 58' from the stormwater pond instead of 75' is acceptable. 4. Park dedication fee to be determined. 5. 6. Drainage issues to be addressed as noted by City Engineer's letter. Applicant to work with the homeowner’s association to use the private road as it exists. 7. 8. 9. Rearrange the lot lines to address the required lot area and lot widths. Move the temporary cul-de-sac to serve all three lots. Stormwater management plan - work with Watershed District and address City Engineer's concerns. AB Zoning File #2449 Notice of Planning Commission Page 2 ♦Above draft conditions from City Recorder. Official minutes are not available yet. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of a revised plan that follows the Planning Commission recommendation. The plan shall be submitted two weeks before the Council meeting. The Council meets the 2nd and 4th Mondays of the month. ♦Some of you may have previously received packets that were incorrectly calibrated for postage due tj> the new postal rates. We apologize for this problem. X:\APPS\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\CAROLE\PCACnON\2449 1 TO:Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator FROM:Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager DATE:December 30,1998 SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2449, Rena Stubb Property - Subdivision The proposed three lot subdivision requires the use of on-site sewage treatment systems. Site evaluation/design has been completed for primary and alternate drainfield sites on each lot. AD proposed septic systems meet City and State standards. A stormwater pond just recently constructed for the Crystal Creek subdivision is directly adjacent to the Stubb property has a small impact on this subdivision. Due to the pond location 20 feet from the Stubb property one proposed drainfield site on lot 3 will be 58 feet from this pond. Normally we would ask for a 75 foot setback to the proposed drainfield site, but since the pond limits the use of this property a slight variance is appropriate. Also, the existing grade does not drain surface water directly from the proposed septic system to this pond and ultimately the septic system will not effect the pond. Based on the above information, staff recommends approval of the application on the condition that a drainage plan is submitted which addresses the aforementioned concerns. The city requires the drainfield sites to be fenced off prior to any grading or land alteration. AC r (...I tj .OJ bl9 jlNuhJ9«;g«v kh i^v I‘jko'I Niiv'jvHvi rur #>- :»jM}m4*aifvi GnouAims qih i *s«!iJNioin ii/io•QNi'oaaaNQHO v tiUAo:) ::fi9r^:NCMSIAiUGnS 03SOdOUd >{Nn3GllH 3>lll^ ■^.rr' v.sv 1.3 »«) «t *4» «ML* •«MM CMai tM t * • ,»«i t-E "n M 04 I GO - i'o-R i !< LJm j_j o jfc £... o uo laiCPMMii,•#•• •^«»#(_□ »•••,■» V* • wf 3 • W A* •rf • .-‘rf • «'t« W.w*d 3.b • *\l _________MM 1 .11 MM H /»••• f/| ••#* 7;^; ovoa ■--.NM0ia3iWcT “--"~ •7 '■ ./-., fr » * »—» • . ^ / .*•••Hfr . ___ \'• L* ' ^ ^'"7 ^. .ir/ \^ ''J \ \ -»r—i-.,* . 1! :: ■ fa? - — Q\/ )< i < / /^ 0i ^•.9, ^ . t ** / \ ■<!.ZS^r?v ••• < •• • • • ‘•j f "x -t’ I-u I!! sJU * r »j 1 T CIV V i 4 l-l libricL^a r [■ J hM.29.19?9 3:31PM t-tti HISTORIChL SOC no.093 P.1/7 .BK 5,5 KelloggBLVt).WEST.ST.PAU1.MN 55102-1906 FAX TRANSMISSION .n i i number of pages including cover . _ TO: FAX NUMBER;, Ma-TO-06(0 FROM: GanoJ>^ •'TTe/s PHONE NUMBER: (651) NOTES: IF YOU DO N n CHECK HERE IF ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW BY MAl OT RECEIVE ALL PAGES. PLEASE CONTACT: (651) 296-5434 - - ■■ JhN.29.1999 3:31PM tttJ HISTOPICl^ s<>: MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE-HISTORY INVENTORY FORM ^ tl*:'.093 lOO P.2/7 TPENTIFICATIQN HISTORIC NAME: Gable barn CURRENT NAME: Rena Stubbs Barn COUNTY; Hennepin CITY/TWP: Orono PROPERTY ID NUMBER: ADDRESS: 3020 Watertown Road INVENTORY NUMBER: HE-ORC-049 SHPO/106 NUMBER; FIELD NUMBER: 2713B-314/T-21 SEl/4. SWl/4, SWl/4 SECTIOS: 33 TOHNSHIP: 118K RANGE: 23U UTM: Z15 E4S26S0 N4980580 uses QUAD; Excelsior 1958 (Revised 1993) description CONSTRUCTION DATE; Circa 1900 ORIGINAL USE: Bam CURRENT USE: Storage STYLE/INFLUENCE: Vernacular RESOURCE TYPE: Bam BUILDER/CONTRACTOR: Unknown ARCHITECT/ENCINEER: Unknown MATERIALS:FDN: Unknown ROOF: Metal CLADDING: Vertical and diagonal aiding STORIES: 1 1/2 ROOF SHAPE: Gable GROUND PLAN: Rectangular FACADE ARRANGEMENT; Asymm NUMBER OF BAYS; Poor: FLOOR PLAN: ^ ^ . ORIENTATION: Central axis north/south WINDOWS; INTEGRITY: Excellent: Good: X Fair: RELATED OUTBUILDINGS: There are aeveral buildingo on thia property, including a house and several outbuildings. RELATION OF PROPERTY TO SURROUNDINGS: The property is just north of Watertown Road and the barn faces the road. ul“s ; Th.t. first lev.l and a hay hood and h«y doors on the sMond levty Thowastarn ^irrr.T»”difg i::. x o... ««d window with 2 lights in the gable peak. 1 ,'5 A I'W.vi v '! "a(J Jrt 1.29.1999 3J31PM m HISTOPI'IhL SC<C MO.092 P.3/7 ADDRESS: 3020 Watertown Road HISTORIC NAME: Gable Bam FIELD NUMBER: 2713B-314/T-21 INVENTORY NUMBER; HE-ORC-049 FXTi^yTaTTQN AND ANALYSIS HISTORIC CONTEXT: Railtoada and Agricultural Development, 1870-1940. HISTORICAL NARRATIVE: Farming has been the basis of the einno tbe arrival of Euroamerican settlers in the 1850s and 1860s. The production of wh.ot for urban narlt.c. doninat.d aplculeur. througb tho 1970., With a mixed pattern of general fanning and dairying gradually coming to promlncnco around tho tum of f.Ho century. cTrMTiTTCAiiCE* This property may be significant for its association with US d«e?;pm^«x‘^JatterL oi farnlS^ In the region. Although th. brood oSSies of thU history have been sketched. Its specific devclopBont is ooorlv known Nor 1« chore subsCantlaced Information about the relation of nrSLutlirming patterns and property type development. It may also he significant as a now rare example of a once-conunon important architectural type. ELIGIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL REGISTER: Yes: District: jIqj’ Individual; Need Info.: X On Register: Contributing: Non-Contributing: State:National:level of SIGNIFICANCE; Local: noCUMENTATION/NOTES 1995 Mather, D. and P. Nunnally u^a^t ^lS“l“e1tstorlcMinnesota Department of Transportation. Copy on file. State Historic Preservation Office, Minnesota Historical Society. MAPfSy HE-ORC-049 p r --t I-s'--■// uses QUAD: Excelsior 1958 (Revised 1993) Form Prepared By: Shawna K. Gibson Date: October 1994 CmsI Creelc I nformCtfi^ort c«w |2oa^ Cb R<s. '•*' 2fHS Cc - PrebVa»V\An^ pM:H Ct>^ SMdP ce GV^ lcii€y. Cf ^ IUso/vili0v>«l 60* acoa> Ori'oi-. - ------- --------------%m mmm • U»*>t mm * P*%j*izz s:sa=r>s; u*g.yf• —.— - r ' .1 ~ taM* • »*• • MSS3rJsr.*vs:~”»* • }^SfSKxsrjSiii*s:.vT.^m. • r-“r-^*5 . . . c«U=r?;j?v« . . . • tm* _______ i • . . . • (• •*• •! • • • • • • • • • ll V •■••• •*•*• ••• r • • • • • • /• •11/ ’ .lft * • * • . ). V. • . 1 • • V’ • ■ • / •. •, V ’ • * •-iV;J . . ~_ / # V ^ • V * • ^ ^ \ xa % \0M\\V.\ \ see AOOITIONAI. NOTCS AMO OCTiUCS ON SHCCT C2 V. Nfe'^v;p^\co r /\^ / /yy,/ 't/j..- ' ///// //v IV •Y -v'v 'I, ^/T'> V :~V' tot:Mt IMA •• %• m u •••■M » u trnmtm •• ••$rnmm m a trnmmm »*•$Mmm w ••trnmmm ■IM Utmmm M •«$m mmm • a $m mmm ■ *•$m mmm • a urn mm I'"%M *---------1 »«r^ *«•••• ^ •»» • M ^TVia* •• 2:5 SS :=L=riSSr .%•• - ••«• mm rnmm kmrn ••*••*::2 srsjrr^ cslt'm. «• .«■ •, • ■■■ m rnammmm • mm • I •• % «,dP3«nnof MJ* -J J*•F •• *.- • W*i«' •B •r:K!?•• •m • aa^ •» . *aa iSiS5v3V ^ •vv^^ dUOMC PLAN i«2 Cb CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948_ _ _ _ _ _ A RBSOLDTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED CRYSTAL CREEK PLAT PILE NO. 1457 HHBREASf Alan G. Carlson (hereinafter "the subdivider") on March 22, 1991 filed a revised formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a 12»lot residential plat of property legally described as follows: Exhibit A, attached, (hereinafter "the property") and; WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seg. and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on March 18, 1991 and March 20, 1991 and the Council on April 8, 1991 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on April 8, 1991, the Orono City Council considered the amended subdivision application of 12 lots, noting the following findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The subdivision as.amended from the original 16-lot proposal finds that each lot meets or exceeds the 2-acre minimum dry contiguous lot area standards. I 3. Each of the 12 lots meets the required lot width to the rear of the 50' front street setback line. Page 1 of 8 A .V kU - 4 o' CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948_________ 4. All of the 12 lots shall achieve access via an interior private roadway. No direct access onto Watertown Road will be allowed for an individual lot owner. 5. The applicant has filed the revised preliminary plan with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. All conditions of MCWD permit must be met by applicant and included with final drainage, grading and erosion control plans. 6. In a memo dated March 13, 1991, Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator, confirmed that all 12 lots have been tested and found to have suitable areas for on-site septic development. Since that memo, Mr. Gaffron has received verbal confirmation from the on-site evaluator that drainfields can be shifted or relocated on Lot 2, Block 2 and Lot 5, Block 3 to meet the on-site septic standards of the City. 7. The proposed configuration and overall design of the lots within the plat finds that each lot satisfies the lot standards of the RR-IB Zoning District requiring no variances with the granting of the approval of this subdivision. Each lot can be developed as a residential unit without the need for future variances. 8. The subdivider has provided a future access corridor to the east and shall be responsible for developing the roadway to the eastern boundary providing a temporary cul-de-sac. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the revised preliminary plat of Crystal Creek per plat survey dated February 26, 1991, revised March 18, 1991 by Edward H. Sunde, a registered land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota of Sunde Land Surveying, Inc., subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 8 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948_________ 1, XrTaccess to the 12-lot plat must be via the interior plat road. Lot 2, Block 2 shall be served from the temporary cul-de-sac via a 15' driveway easement through Lot 1» Block 2. Owner of Lot 1» Block 2 shall grant temporary driveway easement in favor of Lot 2, Block 2 until the adjacent private road is extended along the southern boundaries of Lot 2, Block 2. 2. Prior to any land alterations for drainage or road purposesr the following septic sites must be staked with fencing/ such fencing to be installed 20* from the boundaries of each drainfield .test site as follows: Lot 1/ Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 1/ Block 2 Lot 2, Block 2 Lot 1/ Block 3 (southwest corner drainfield site only) Lot 3/ Block 3 Lot 5, Block 3 3. Subdivider to grant underlying road and utility easements over private road outlots (Outlots A and D). 4. Outlot A shall be installed as a 28* roadway with curb (urban section). Temporary cul-de-sac shall be designated at a 100* diameter with actual traveled turnaround at an 80* diameter. I 5. Subdivider to grant conservation and flowage easements over all wetland/flood plain areas defined at or below the 970 elevation. The subdivider should also grant drainage easements over drainageways and storm sewers not located within right-of-way of road outlots. Page 3 of 8 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948_ _ _ _ _ use the standard form used by the City for inclusion in the private covenants. In addition, the City will expect private covenants to address maintenance and protection of drainageways and retention areas by private property owners. Upon preliminary approval of the plat, the subdivider is to draft appropriate private covenants to be submitted to the City prior to the City granting approval of the final plat. 7. Applicant shall create a Homeowners' Association to ensure upkeep and maintenance of private road. This document must provide for an undivided share of the ownership of said road and future deed transfering ownership of residential lots must include the undivided or equal share in private road. 8. Subdivider to execute a drainfield covenant to be filed against the Chain of Title of each of the 12 lots within the plat in order^ to ensure future owners knowledge and awareness of the special limitations on the septic capabilities of the rural lots and the need to protect existing septic test sites. The City requests that the following addition be made to the original septic covenant proposed by applicant for original 16-lot plat. The following sentence is to be added between sentences 1 and 2: "In most case^ these are the only two feasible sites on and must not ^ disturbed. The existing natural tops^l must remain in place and must not be subject ^ any traffic will cause even the slightest compaction." 9. The subdivider shall maintain adequate erosion control per final approved plans by Gerald K. Sunde throughout the construction of the road, drainage improvements and until all ground cover disturbed on the property is restored. Page 4 of 8 CITY of ORONO ^ V ’yvOv k RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948_ _ _ _ _ 10. ^iTie developer to create easements in favor of the Homeowners Association over Lots 1, Block 1 and Lot 1/ Block 3 for the purpose of maintenance and upkeep of the entrance monuments. The City approves the monuments proposed on plans dated December 19, 1989, revised March 18, 1991 by Gerald M. Sunde entitled "Typical Monument Detail" that defines 5 1/2' high, 10 lineal feet in length, 3’ wide monuments to be installed on each side of the entrance of the private road. The final installed height of these monuments cannot exceed a height of 6‘ measured from elevation of private road. 11. All final grading, drainage and road plans shall be done in accordance with the directives of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit and the final report of the City Engineer before any land alterations or construction can begin. The subdivider shall execute a developer's agreement that shall include all required improvements. The subdivider shall also provide a Letter of Credit to be written to the amount of 150% of the cost of all improvements. The Letter of Credit must also be submitted prior to final plat approval by the City. The subdivider is hereby advised that building permits shall not be issued upon final plat approval until gravel road base has been approved by the City Engineer and required drainage ponds and controls have been installed and approved by the City Engineer. 12. On-site evaluator to provide written confirmation that the shifting of drainfields within Lot 2, Block 2 and Lot 5, Block 3 will satisfy on-site septic standards of City Code. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month; Page 5 of 8 5 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948_________ ? r* •*‘C.’rA.-.VT.* A.^^'l^BCOlfD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Edward H. Sunde of Sunde Land Surveying, Inc. dated February 26, 1991, revised March 18, 1991, b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines - omit along the sides of the designated wetlands defined as drainage easements. • c) Designate all wetland areas (areas at or below 970 elevation, as drainage easements). d) Designate all drainageways and storm sewers as drainage easements on the plat. e) Dedication of right-of-way for Watertown Road. B. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: (\^ • a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Executed Drainage Easements over all drainageways and storm sewer lines if applicable (refer to sample easements provided to you with original plat application), to include all drainageways not included within flood plain/wetlands area below 970 elevation.) Page 6 of 8 o o «4 t CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948_________ Executed Flowage and Conservation Easement over all designated wetland areas at or below 970 elevation (refer to / CiV-'*' original easement enclosed with former preliminary plat ( '* resolution). e) Signed and executed Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit to cover all required improvements. f) Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over the private road outlots (Outlots A and ^ - refer to previous , samples). y g) Signed and executed temporary Road and Utility Easement over portions of cul-de-sac not located within private road outlot. h) Private covenant s/creation of Homeowners' Association in a form for filing to include division of ownership and responsibility for maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities (refer to original documents). i) Executed drainfield covenant prepared for filing against each lot to be amended per Item 8 in conditions of approval as noted above. . •*>•••• * r/fj'-j j) Completed "Application for Private Road Name". Subdivider shall have the choice of naming the road within Outlot A and C (refer to original documents). C. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $300.00 • .1 3 - /•? i I a) Final plat fee = $150.80 ^00.00 b) Legal review and filing fees of $i50 ;-&C" “^00. OC c) ParJc dedication fee = $3,200 already paid by subdivider Page 7 of 8 ()3/17/97 Pay CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948 the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 8th day of April, 1991. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: M^^allin,'city ClerkDorothy STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of April, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City." Notary Public 9-Ms My Commission Expires i Page 8 of 8 yrcunjoir £'< 9^%n%u^ maj^ yi* ?jVU!jriii .......... l» • ■SI '>i • M « '>ci OUTLOT- ?48 bSm •V-!./ ^^/t; L* tD‘ \U jollfl... ]j\f. y;.«y^5! • • k>« i«> V m ••«« *»« •« !/• ••■ • « «k* (•tMaW •• rift »•»• Ml* «••«»•••« ►••••^ «M«* •>^*»«. ••• •• «•*•• «« To: From: Date: Mayor Peterson & Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator March 29, 1991 Cb Subject: #1457 Alan Carlson, 3140 Watertown Road - Revised Preliminary Plat - Resolution The revised preliminary plat has been accepted under the former application number (#1457) and the required public hearing scheduled at March 18/20, 1991 meeting of the Planning Commission and Council April 8, 1991 meeting. At the time of the filing of the revised subdivision application, Mr. Carlson also filed a separate conditional use permit/variance application for proposed improvements within commons outlot involving land alterations, installation of tennis court, gazebo and trail system. Application #1630 was tabled by the Planning Commission until applicant had completed the permit review process with the Corps of Engineers for trail system. Applicant advised that Corps had no ojplnion concerning proposed installation of structures, within the plat. Please review staff memo dated March 14, 1991 for more detailed Information on the filing of the revised prellmin iry plan. List of Exhibits for #1457 - Revised Preliminary Subdivision Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit A -* Resolution #2764, Preliminary Plat Approval, 3/12/90 ' Carlson Letter 2/11/91 • Cook Report 3/11/91 - Gaffron Report 3/13/91 • Staff Sketch of Future Connecting Road Final Exhibit - Revised Preliminary Plan a) Preliminary Plat b) Grading Plan c) Road Profile/Typical Section/Elevation Monuments d) Location Map Review of Revised Preliminary Application - At the March 18th meeting, the applicant submitted a second revised plan addressing the issues raised in the staff memo dated March 14th. All lots meet the dry contiguous buildable 2-acre area. All lots meet the required lot width to the rear of the front yard setback line of 50'. The outlets are now redefined as follows: Zoning Pile #1457 March 29, 1991 Page 2 Outlet A Outlot B Outlet C Outlot D Private road Access path to a shared commons area for all 12 lots Area designated for future development Road outlot to future developed property at north and to connect from extension of Outlot A through A. Stubbs property Outlot E ~ Property at north side of Burlington Railroad available for combination with adjacent properties if applicant wishes to release for sale. The road is now shown connecting to the east at the edge of the A. Stubbs property. Please review Exhibit K from the original packet that reflects consistency with previous planning for roadways to the east. Applicant now shows a temporary cul- de-sac. The area of a temporary cul-de-sac, at least portions not Included within 50' road lot are not excluded from the dry buildable of the adjacent residential lots. Applicant's engineer has submitted amended road plans including street plans and profile. The revised grading/erosion plans have been amended to include erosion control. The entrance monuments proposed by applicant are the same as originally approved in the 16-lot preliminary plat. The Planning Commission asks that because of proposed grading or berming to the east side of the entrance that a limitation be placed on final height of monuments in relation to elevation of adjacent road stating that monuments overall final height could not exceed 6' above elevation of the private road. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the 12-lot revised preliminary plan subject to all pertinent conditions for the current plat as set forth in original Resolution #2764, Exhibit A. The Planning Commission asked the Council to consider the following additional conditions: 1. Future development lot, Outlot C, has no legal approved access. Access to the property would have to be via adjacent properties to the east and south. Final resolution approving this subdivision shall note this. In addition, applicant must agree to execute a covenant to be filed on the Chain of Title of Outlot C agreeing to restrict development until approved access is provided via adjacent properties. Zoning File #1457 March 29, 1991 Page 3 2.Monuments not to exceed 6' total height to be measured from final elevation adjacent to private road. The enclosed approval resolution for the 12-lot plat has been drafted and includes the final 2 conditions of approval recommended by the Planning Commission. Isv m M Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Otto G Bonncoa P£. Mert W Aosene. f£. Joseph C Andertk. Ft Maivm L SorvaU. F£ ftchaid E. TUmer. PE. Oenn R. Cook PE. Thomas E. No>ei PE. AoOeft G SchunichL PE. Susan M. Ebenm. C PA Engineers & Architects •Crth A Goedoa PE. ISchaid W Fosttt PE. Donald C Sugaidt PE Jerry A Bouidoa PE. Mart A Hanson. PE. TWERektPE Michael T. ftautmana PE Robert E PHefltrte. PE. David Q loskoci. PE. Thomas W. Peterson. PE. Michael C Lynch. PE. James R. MaiandL PE. Kenneth P Andersoa PE. Mark E ItotfL PE. AobenC. Russek. AlA Thomas E. Angui PE. Howifd A Sanfeidl PE. Daniel i Edgenoa PE. Mark A Se^ PE. Phrfip X Caswei. PE. Ismael Mardnez. PE. Mark D M/kRl PE. Thomas E Andersoa AlA Gary P Rytander. PE. MiesE Jensea PE. L Ph«0 Gravel«. PX teneC Pkjmari AlA Agnes M. Ring. AJCP Jerry D. Pwzsch. PE. CecOo Oivief. PX Robert E DrebkMi PE. Gary W. Morlea PX Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawdsky Harlan M. Olson March 11,1991 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Re: Crystal Creek File No. 139-1457 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the revised Crystal Creek Preliminary plan submitted on the Alan Carlson property. The private street (Outlot A) should be terminated in a cul-d-sac. This would be temporary and used until the property to the east is developed. The flooding and drainage easements should be shown on Outlot D. The construction of a flood control structure on Outlot C will be required. The drainage swale along the west line of lots 1 and 2 will be necessary. An easement over the 15" culvert on Lx)t 1 Block 2 and Lot 5 Block 3 will be required. The plan should indicate which typical section is to be used where on the street. The proposed monument location should be shown on the plan. The street plans and profile sheet should be completed. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:dh 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 Cf m CITYof ORONO iiK RESOLUTION OFTHE CITY COUNCIL 3896 SHO NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF CRYSTAL CREEK FILE NO. 1457 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, tlie City Council has considered the final plat application of a twelve lot residential Class III subdivision and plat by Kingsbridge Properties, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter "the subdivider"); and WHEREAS, per Resolution No. 2948 of the City of Orono, the City Council approved the preliminary plat application for the twelve lot residential subdivision on April 8, 1991; and WHEREAS, the City Council has granted five extensions of the deadline for the preliminary subdivision application imtil the issue of a southern bypass for Highw'ay 12 that would intersect the property was resolved; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-IB, Rural Residential Zoning District finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that would allow its use as a single family residence to be fiilly developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, on November 26, 1996, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers approved Permit #96-254 that granted conditional approval of the grading and drainage plans for the Crystal Creek subdivision; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 1997, Stephen Weekman, Orono ’s On-Site Septic Systems Manager, reported that all tested septic sites proposed in 1990/1991 preliminary review meet City end State standards; and Page 1 of 6 CITYoTORONO im RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MO 3 8 9 6 WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 3. 6. 8. 1 . Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 2948, the resolution of the City granting preliminary approval of the plat. 2. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. Dedication on the plat of drainage easements o\ er all drainageways and NURP ponds and shown as drainage easements on the plat. 4. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for Watertown Road. Dedication of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlot A, to be known henceforth as Crystal Creek Road. Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the subdivider has dedicated to the City a road and utility easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said outlot; the subdivider has created non exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements over said outlot in favor of all abutting and/or benefitting lots including a declaration of certain maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting and/or benefitting lot owners covenants and agrees to permanently maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private road. Outlot B may be residentially developed in the future. The subdivision shall be subject to all applicable ordinances in effect at the time of subdivision. The subdivider shall be responsible for providing legal access to the property . Outlot C is imbuildable. The parcel is divided from the remainder of the property by the Burlington Norther Railroad right-of-way and may be sold and legally combined with an adjacent property. Dedication to the City of a flowage and conservation easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands protected by the City of Orono and showm on the plat as "wetland drainage easements". Page 2 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Q p ^ “ K/ y 9. 11. 12. 13. The subdivider has created a protective covenant for Lot 1, Block 2 that contains a wetland not included within the conservation maps of the City of Orono. The covenant shall include a site plan of Lot 1, Block 2 locating the area of the wetland. The subdivider has dedicated to the City a temporary road and utility easement over the cul-de-sac to be installed at the end of the private road. The easement shall be taken over portions of the 100' diameter cul-de-sac not included within tlie 50' road outlot. The subdivider has created drainfield covenants to be filed against the Chain of Title of each of the twelve lots within the plat in order to ensure future owners are aware of the special limitations on the septic capabilities of each of the rural lots and the need to protect existing septic test sites both during construction and after construction. The covenant will include a site plan locating the septic sites and provide guidelines for the protection of those sites. The developer has created easements in fa’ or of the Homeowners Association over Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 for the purpose of upkeep and maintenance of the entrance monuments to be installed at the intersection of Crystal Creek Road and Watertown Road. The subdivider has executed a Develops .''s Agreement prodding for the installation of comprehensive improvements required as a condition of approval of the Crystal Creek subdivision. The subdivider has posted a Letter of Credit in the amount of $254,820.00 to ensure that these required improvements are completed to the City's satisfaction. Some of these comprehensive improvements include the following: A. All grading and drainage improvements as shown on Grading Plan pages C- 1 and C-2 by Sundee Engineering, Inc., most revised date January 8, 1997. B. Private road improvement as shown on C-3, Crystal Creek Road Plan/Profile by Sundee Engineering, Inc., dated March 5, 1997. C. Erosion control as shown on C-1 and C-2 of the grading plans by Sundee Engineering, Inc., most revised date January 8, 1997. Page 3 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 8 9ft . D. Restoration ot ground cover and plantings per landscape plans created by subdivider. 14. The subdivider made payment to the City in 1990 of a park dedication fee in the amount of $3,200.00. 15. The subdivider has made payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $200.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Crystal Creek, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: The subdivider to grant driveway easement at 15' width over Lot 6, Block 1 in favor of Lot 7, Block 1 that will be in effect until an alternate legal access is provided via a future private road. Access to the twelve lots within Crystal Creek shall be via the interior private plat road. Access to residential lot or lots developed within Outlot B shall be served by either Outlot A (Crystal Creek Road) and/or approved legal access via contiguous properties. The subdivider is further advised that Outlot B cannot be residentially developed as either one or multiple lots without first seeking subdivision approval from the City of Orono. 3. Prior to any land alterations, the subdivider shall be responsible for the following: A.Installation of stormwater ponds as approved by the City of Orono and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. B, The subdivider is required to stake \vith fencing all septic sites. Such fencing to be installed 20' from the boundaries of each drainfield test site. C. Installation of erosion control. Page 4 of 6 I -----i CITYofORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^^96_____ 4. 5. 6. D.The subdivider to provide plan/detail on drainageway to be installed along shared lot lines of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 noting care must be taken when constructing this drainageway to prevent drainage from meandering or filling with sediment and floo^g adjacent septic sites. The City Engineer and On-Site System Manager shall approve these plans. The subdivider shall be responsible for completing all conditions of the MCWD Permit #96-254 as follows: A.Execution of stormwater facilities maintenance agreement, a copy of which must be submitted to the City of Orono before land alteration commences. B. C. Stormwater ponds built and functional prior to all other site work. Activities including, but not limited to, mowing, yard waste disposal and fertilizer application shall not occur within the wetland buffer zone. D. Wetland buffer restrictions shall be noted on all property deeds. Erosion control shall be installed as shown on final grading and drainage plans by Sundee Engineering, Inc. (see Finding 13, C above) and maintained until natural ground cover is restored. No bui’v!ing permits will be issued until all drainage facilities have been in-- .ind aj;pfoved and a satisfactory road base installed. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder ’s Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before November 12, 1997 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants noted above. Page 5 of 6 i -1 • • CITYofORONO *i'i '*vv lUi RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^ 8 9 6 ___ The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision approval. Dated this 12th day of May, 1997. ATTEST: bthy M City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Ma STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of April, 1997 by Gabriel Jabbour and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Page 6 of 6 Dite of Applicttion: 2/17/99 Dtte Complete: 2/17/99 60 day Umii: 4/17/99 COUNCIL MEETING APR 1 2 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY unv^ixu DATE: ITEM NO.: /C Department Approval: Name Liz Van Zomeren Title City Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:W467 Steve Bohl/Bohland Development 1025 Brown Road South Class in Preliminary Plat--6 lot subdivision Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Lot Area:45.13 acres Application: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property located at 1025 South Brown Road into six (6) residential lots. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Rural Residential. It is located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The properties to the south are sewered and a sewer project is planned for the properties directly to the north. There are several issues with the application as follows: 1. The dedication of right-of-way for South Brown Road and Willow Drive South; 2. The 50' x 200' tax-forfeited parcel next to South Brown Road. 3. The parcel to be identified as Outlot A across Willow Drive South to be deeded to the adjacent property owner. 4. The grading for a driveway within 5* of the property line for Lot 1 requires a conditional use permit. The applicant has worked with staff to incorporate the City Engineer's, Laixiscape Architect's and Planning Commission's comments. The blueprints that are included in the City Council's packets include the latest revisions. Date of Application: 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60 day limit: 4/17/99 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended approval, subject to incorporation of the conditions in the staff report. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To discuss the tax-forfeited parcel for inclusion in Lot 4 and provide direction to staff. To review the two resolutions, one for the preliminary plat, and one for the conditional use permi. for grading the driveway for Lot I and amend or adopt the resolutions. Attachments RESOLUTIONS A B C D E F Letter from applicant Notice of FC action Staff drawing of Planning Commission's comments Memo irom Landscape Architect Memo from Westwood Engineering reiWetland delineation Staff report to PC dated March 15, 1999 (see staff report for list of exhibits) V 'i A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19-21 FILE #2467 WHEREAS, Steve Bohl, Bohland Development, (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 8xx Brown Road South within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Ceirriage Hill, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a conditional use permit to allow for construction of a driveway to be located in King Street and shared with 77S Brown Road South where grading is proposed within 5 ’ of the property line per Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21. Miimesota: 1. 2. 3. 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2467, a subdivision for property located at 1025 Brown Road South known as "Carriage Hill." The property is located in the RR-IB Rural Residential District. The lot consists of 20.8 acres where 6.0 acres is dry buildable. The proposed driveway is proposed to be shared with the adjacent northerly property at 775 Brown Road South. No other residential lots shall be served by the proposed driveway. 5. King Street is a platted, unopened public street. Page 1 of 4 6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow grading within 5’ of the property line will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, will not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 7. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21, to permit grading within 5’ of the property line, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. The proposed grading for the driveway may result in diversion of surface runoff onto the northern property. Appropriate drainage rights must be secured from the adjacent property owner. The applicant should provide detailed information about the size and type of trees that will be removed or affected by the development of the lot and construction of the driveway. The root zones of trees and woods to remain are to be fenced and maintained as off limits to construction activities. A field wetland delineation and survey shall be provided where the drive crosses. A 26 ’ wetland setback shall be mair*rined. 5. The applicant shall obtain the appropriate permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and a land alteration permit from the City. 2 of 4 6.Authorities granted by this resolution are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (April 12, 2000). 7.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by die Orono City Council on this 12th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of April, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 L STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 4 of 4 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 1025 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - FILE NO. 2467 WHEREAS, Steve Bohl on behalf of Bohland Dei'elopment (hereinafter the ’’developer") on February 17, 1999, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a six (6) lot residential plat of property legally described as: Exhibit A attached, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property ’’); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the Municipal Code of Ordinances, Chapter 10 (Zoning Code) and Chapter 11 (Subdivision), the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 15, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on April 12, 1999, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Steve Bohl/Bohland Development, noting the following findings of 'act: 1.The property is located in the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two (2) acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. 3. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as "Rural Residential." The site data is; Acres Sq Ft. Site Area 45.1 1,965,764.6 Wetlands 23.0 992,224.8 Pond 0.4 17,037.0 Net Area 22.0 956,502.2 The wetland is a Type 2 and Type 3 marsh, designated "PEMC" for palustrine, emergent on the National Wetland Inventory Map. Page 1 of 9 1 4. The site will drain west under Willow Drive South into the wetland surrounding French Lake. 5. 8 The lot area data is; Total Lot Acres Sq Ft.Drv Acres Sq. Ft. l 20.8 903,071.4 6.0 260,180.5 2 9.3 406,070.3 3.6 157,146.2 3 4.4 190,102.3 2.0 87,219.5 4 2.3 101,430.4 2.0 88,536.3 5 2.4 106,800.0 2.0 87,762.5 6 2.0 87,134.8 2.0 87,134.8 Each lot meets the minimum lot area requirement.Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 are subject to a 26'wetland setback. Lot 1 is proposed to have a driveway in King Street, a public streei, t.-* be have an address on Brown Road South. Part of Lot 1 is located within 1,000 feet of Long Lake Creek as noted on Sheet 5 of 8 dated 2-19-99, most revised 3-26-99 by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. A conditional use permit is required for grading the driveway for Lot 1 within 5' of the property line. Lot 2 is proposed to have access from Outlot B, a 30* outlot from the cul-de-sac for proposed Carriage Lane. The front yard for Lot 2 will be along the extension of the outlot as shown in Sheet 4 of 8 dated 2-18-99, most revised 3- 26-99. The lot line adjacent to Willow Drive South will be considered a side yard adjacent to street. Lot 2 will not have access to Willow Drive South and will not be considered a through lot. Part of the lot is located within the 1,000 feet setback from French Lake. Lot 3 is proposed to have access from the proposed cul-de-sac for Carriage Lane. Part of Lot 3 contains a wetland. Page 2 of9 9. Lot 4 is proposed to have access from the propo -M cul-de-sac for Carriage Lane. Lot 4 will not be considered a through lot and will not have access from Brown Road South. 10. Lot 5 is proposed to have access from proposed Outlot C, "Carriage Lane." No access will be provided from Willow Drive South. The property line along Willow Drive South shall be considered a side yard adjacent to street. Lot 5 is proposed to have a stormwater management pond (NURP Pond). 11. Lot 6 is proposed to have access from Outlot C, "Carriage Lane." No access will be provided from Willow Drive South. The property line adjacent to Willow Drive South will be considered the side yard adjacent to street. 12. Outlot B shall serve Lot 2. The outlot shall be in the ownership of Lot 2. 13. Outlot C, "Carriage Lane," will serve Lots 2, 4, 5 and 6. Lot 3 will have access to Outlot C, "Carriage Lane," via Outlot B. The subdivider shall be required to execute covenants to define responsibility for construction and maintenance of Outlot C, and to define future financial obligation for repair and maintenance by a homeowner's association. 14. Right-of-way will be dedicated for 33' for Brown Road South and 66' for Willow Drive South. 15. Outlot A may be deeded to the adjacent property owner at 845 Willow Drive South. 16. The exception. Lot 10, B^ock 6, Minnetonka View (vacated), which was tax- forfeited in 1982 and co.iveyed to the City of Orono may be sold to the developer for inclusion in Lot 4. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided. 17. The property is not located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Lots 1-6 contain suitable septic sites for primary and alternate drainfields to serve single family residences. Septic sites shall be located 75' from water supply wells and wetlands. Also septic sites shall be located 20 from impervious surfaces and property lines. Page 3 of 9 18. Single family residences can be constructed on Lots 1-6 without further variances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the pi w*.illinary plat for Bohland Development at 1025 Brown Road South per the plan set, Sheets 1-8, as prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. dated 2-18-99 as revised, subject to the following conditions: 1. Outlot B shall be owned by the owner of Lot 2. No access shall be provided from Outlot B to Lot 3 or Lot 6. Outlot B shall be landscaped to provide adequate screening from traffic on behalf of Lots 3 and 6. Lot 1 shall have access to Brown Road South via a driveway in King Street. Lots 2-6 shall have access to Willow Drive South via Carriage Lane 2. Outlot C, "Carriage Lane" shall be platted at 50' right-of-way. The minimum paved width shall be 24' rural section subdivision. The subdivider shall provide an underlying road and utility easement over Outlot C to the City. 3. Standard perimeter, drainage and utility easements shall be granted over the entire plat (5' along interior lot lines, 10' along exterior). 4. Drainage and grading improvements to the property shall be constructed per the drainage and grading plan approved by the City Engineer, subject to a Developer's Agreement. 5. The subdivider shall grant conservation, drainage, and flowage easements over the wetland and stormwater management pond. 6. Subdivider shall protect drainheld sites via fencing prior to construction of driveways and drainage improvements and it shall remain in place until construction is completed. 7. Subdivider shall dedicate 33’ of right-of-way for Brown Road South and 66' of right-of-way for Willow Drive South. Page 4 of 9 8. Outlet A to be deeded to the adjacent property owner, 845 Willow Drive South, 845 Willow Drive South. 9. Subdivider to pay the park dedication fee, as determined by the County Assessor, per Section 11.62. 10. No building permits shall be issued until the construction of driveway and drainage improvements is completed. 11. The subdivider shall obtain appropriate permits from Hennepin County and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). All areas within the county right-of-way disturbed during construction shall be restored. 12. Trees shall be plai.ted along Carriage Lane and Willow Drive South per the plan. Sheet 8 of 8 dated 3-24-99. 13. Subdivider to provide a letter of credit for 150% of the site improvements based on the City Engineer's estimate. 14, 15. 16. I'he City shall grant a conditional use permit for grading within 5' of the property line for Lot 1 per Resolution #_______. The subdivider is hereby advised that the preliminary subdivision approval will expire within one year of the date of Council approval, April 12, 2000. The subdivider is hereby advised that the City cannot grant final plat approval until a permit from the MCWD has been approved for all grading and drainage improvements. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals shall be submitted to the City two (2) weeks prior to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting: Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"=200'. Drawing to include: Page 5 of9 1 Lot lines per survey by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., Sheet 4 of 8, dated 2-18-95, most revised 3-26-99. B C Dedication of all drainage, utility, conservation and flowage easements. Dedication of 33' for Brown Road South and 66' for Willow Drive South. Naming of plat. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: A. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B The applicant shall provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C. D. E. F. Signed and executed drainage, conservation and flowage easements. Signed and executed Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit. Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over Outlot C. Signed and executed covenants defining responsibility for construction and maintenance for Outlot C, defining future financial obligations. G. Completed application for private road name. 3. FEES TO BE PAID: A. B. C. Final plat fee; $200.00. Legal review and filing fee: $200.00. Park Dedication Fee 6 new lots x .$4,900 - $29,400, Page 6 of 9 \ 4 j I Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 12th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of April, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 7 of 9 -I •4, STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of___, 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of___, 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this____day of___, 199 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing mstrument,and acknowledged that hs (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBUC Page 8 of 9 EXHIBIT A PRC^OSKO I.EGAi. DESCRIPTION Thct port of ihc Norlhecst Ouorter of the Northwest Quarter end Government Lot 6 in Section 10. Township 117. Range 23, Hennepin County. Minnesota, described as follows: ♦ Commencing at the northeast corner of said Government Lot 6; thence South 00 degrees 04 minutes 55 seconds West, assumed bearing, dong the cost line of said Government Cot 6. o distance of 61.43 feet to the octuol point of beginning; thence North 00 degrees 04 minutes 55 seconds Cost, olong the east line of sold Government Lot 6 end said Northeost Ouorter of the Northwest Quarter, o distance of 1336.12 feet to the Intersection with the easterly extension of the south line of King Street, os dedicated on the plot of MINNETONKA View, according to the recorded plot thereof thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 50 seconds West, olong said south line and sold easterly extension, o distance of 173.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 04 minutes 55 seconds Cost, porattel with said eost line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, o distance of 33.00 feet to the north ibie soid Northeast Ouorter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 50 seconds West, olong said north line o distance of 1154.93 feet to the northwest comer of soid Northeost Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 08 rninutes 30 seconds West, olong the west line of sold Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, o distance of 622.71 feet to the north line of JOHNSTON'S FRENCH LAKE SECOND ADDITION, occording to the recorded plot thereof; thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes 52 seconds Cost, along said north line, o distance of 37.26 feet to the northeast comer of said JOHNSTON'S FRENCH LAKE SECOND ADDITION; thence South 02 degrees 05 minutes 38 seconds Cost, along the east line of sold JOHNSTON'S FRENCH LAKE SECOND AODIRON. a distonce of 224.10 feet; thence southerly, continuing olong soid east line, olong o tangential curve, concove to the east, having o centre! angle of 26 degrees 30 minutes 01 seconds, a radius of 669.62 feet, for on arc distonce of 309.71 feet; thence South 54 degrees 45 minutes 18 seconds East, continuing along sold east line, not tangent to the lost described curve, o. distance of 83.06 feet; thence South 35 degrees 36 minutes 55 seconds East, continuing olong soid east line, o distonce of 96.43 feet to the most easterly comer of said JOHNSTON’S FRENCH LAKE SECOND ADDITION; thence North 53 degrees 30 minutes 36 seconds East, o distance of 243.02 feet; thence South 44 degrees 51 minutes 12 seconds East. 0 distance of 246.84 feet; thence South 47 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 284.00 feet to the center line of Willow Drive; thence South 35 degrees 40 .'minutes 44 seconds East, olong soid centerline o distance of 630.17 feet to o line that beers South 41 degrees 04 minutes 55 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence North 41 degrees 04 minutes 55 seconds Eost, o distance of 833.84 feet to the point of beginning. Except .thcrcircm loi IC. Block 6, soid MINNETONKA VIEW Page 9 of 9 r TT i A t _ 1 l I 'j Development, Inc. City of Orono Liz Van Zomeren City Planner 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, Minnesota 55323 March 31, 1999 RECEIVED MAR 7 1 1999 CITY Of 0R0i\’0 i Thank you for the acceptance of our Preliminary^lat application and the commehts we received following the Planning Commission Meeting. We are submitting revised plans for the City Council Meeting. The changes should address the comments made by City of Orono staff, the engineer and landscapers. There are two areas that I would like to have you consider in reference to the planners and landscapers comments. The planner suggested that we include a street design and construction with “urban” specifications. This alternative, in my opinion, is not necessary and is inconsistent with previous developments, and does not fulfill the characteristics of a more rural/ acreage smaller subdivision. I am requesting that the most commonly used street design and stormwater management practices be implemented. Carriage Hill is the name of the development and is characteristic of the topography, history and feel for the neighborhood. The homes will be built on acreage homesites with a country or rural feel. This is what the market accepts an<*' is desiring. Three of the homesites are already under contract for sale pending development approval, all three of the potential homeowners prefer a 24’ street with grade ditches which is more typical for the setting. They prefer the landscaping comments regarding trees along Willow Drive and up along Carriage Lane. Our application shows the design with surface storm water management allowing flow to a NURP pond and eventually into French Lake. This plan has also been submitted to Jim Hafner at Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. After conversations with Jim, he commented that in this situation, continuing to allow water to surface drain, combined with the permeable sandy soil is a beneficial BMP that allows for an increased ability to improve water quality. This is in contrast to dumping all of the water off the roofs, drives and street into catch basins and into the pond without having the opportunity to increase water quality with the surface flow and on-site absorption. The more impervious the surface reduces the opportunity to improve water quality especially with the sandy soils. 420 Upland Lane North • Plymouth, MN 55447 • Phone (612) 476-4459 • FAX (612) 476-4459 i The pond may need to be increased for additional water quantity if a sub-surface storm sewer system were installed which would make lot line rearrangement more difficult. Storm sewer systems also require maintenance compared to surface stormwater management. I am familiar with Crystal Creek, one of the projects, and maybe the only smaller residential development in Orono with sub-surface storm water management and curbs. Pillar Homes, a homebuilding company that I own is currently building in this neighborhood. The curbing easily becomes damaged. The site needed this type of storm water management due to the topography, and ultimately reduces the character of a non- urban streetscape. BohLand Development is currently completing a twenty-lot subdivision in the City of Independence that provides surface storm water management and is an important characteristic to feel of the neighborhood and improves water quality. At the request of the buyers already interested in purchasing in Carriage Hill, comments from the MCWD, and to maintain the characteristics of a non-urban streetscape, I am requesting that we approve the application that we have submitted. Other changes to the revised plan includes adding trees along Willow Drive and Carriage Lane. The exception to the landscapers comments would be to eliminate the additional landscaping along the back of lot 4 adjoining Brown Road. This request comes form the purchaser of this lot. He is requesting that additional trees not be added because of the many mature trees that are already in place and keep as much remaining sunlight as possible in his backyard. The other exception would be not to add any trees around the cul de sac portion and along the outlet access to lot 2.1 would prefer to leave this up to the l^dscape plan T . the individual homeowners and will approve all landscape plans provided accordir • *o the Homeowners Association By Laws. Any trees on these portions of the lots will probably be destroyed during construction. The following is response to additional recommendEtions from the Planning Commission dated March 16,1999. 1. I have submitted the CUP land alteration application and paid the appropriate fees for lot 1. The tree inventory inside the grading limits for lot 1 will be completed for the Final application. A larger scale grading plan has been submitted showing the 6’ addition to ihe existing driveway and the proposed grading detail for lot 1. 2. The driveways for lots 5 and 6 will have access from Carriage Lane. 3. Landscape (see above) 4. Lot 2 yards and setbacks shown as determined by staff and Planning Commission. 5. Engineering. Changes made according to suggestions with the exceptions as explained above. 6. We also disclosed the possibility of the City of Orono deeding the “exception piece” along Brown Road to include with this plat. The buyer for lot 4 is interested in this becoming part of his lot. Outlot A as shown on the plan could be deeded to the owners of the adjoining property. I would like to suggest that the City of Orono deed without cost the “exception piece” and in turn BohLand Development deed outlot A to the adjoining property owner at no cost. This proposal would make this a cleaner plat and resolve any further issues between property owners. exception piece (Richardson ’s property) along Willow Dnve have been altered. We found that the Richardson ’s, and our property, had discrepancies between the two legal descriptions. BohLand development and the Richardson ’s are exchanging the north and easterly property boundaries to resolve the discrepancy. This will be resolved along with the filing of the plat Please consider these options and forward to the City Council for review. Sincerely, Steven Bohl BohLand Development #24 Tt 13 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PHONE:(612)249-4600 FAX:(612)249-4616 ZONING FILE #2467 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: March 16, 1999 TO:Steve Bohl 420 Upland Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 COPIES TO: TYPE OF APPLICATION:Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 3/15/99 VOTE:5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below: 1.Need conditional use permit for grading driveway for Lot 1. (Need more detail at larger scale.) 2. Need to have access for Lots 5 and 6 from Carriage Lane, not the cul-de-sac. 3.Incorporate landscape architect's recommendations for screening on lots and right-of- way. 4. Lot 2 yards and setbacks as identified. 5. Incorporate City Engineer's comments. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of the above information. Deadline for the April 12th meeting is April 1. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. X:\APPS AVP%'IN60AVPDOCSCAROLE\PCACnON\2467 1 V i i 03/14/99 13:49 FAX $12 337 S$01 DSU, INC. ‘.f ■ I 4 ‘s •• DAI ILGRm SHARDLX)W ANi:> IjBAN ■D @001 From Pfvooc# lAJAdX^ INCORrOKATID CONSULTING PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH SUITE 210 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55401 612-339 3300 PHONE 612 337-5601 FAX t ■■ DATE:14 March 1999 TO:Elizabeth Van Zomeren Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Fox 612-249-4616 FROM:Wallace L. Case, ASIA Landscape Architect/Planner r /I RE:Review of Preliminary Plat Submission Drawings Class III Subdivision Preliminary Plat Bohland Development 1025 Brown Road S. Application # 2467 In response to your request, we have visited the site, reviewed the Preliminary Plat Submission Drawings for the proposed Carriage Hill Development and have the following comments. LOT 1 ISSUES The proposed development of Lot 1 raises several issues that need to be addressed. Access: The developer proposes providing access to Lot 1 from Brown Road S by widening an existing driveway that serves an existing home to the north. 1.Existing access at this location is provided by a very obscure, narrow cut through a 8 to 12 feet high embankment. The existing narrow cut and a high concrete retaining wall immediately along the north side of the existing drive limits visibility into and out of the drive. The proposed plans for accessing Lot 1 call for a O.’ ;OBS\160nCARHL399\399CARHL.MEM 03/14/99 13:49 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU. INC.0002 2. 3. Tree removal; 1. 2. V/tdened and combined drive which will increase the visual prominence of the drive, and improve visibility to and from the drive. However, the sight distance to the north needs to be reviewed. The building site for Lot 1 is located on a wooded island surrounded almost entirely by wetland. The proposed driveway for this location is approximately 480 foot long. It is west facing, has a maximum grade of 10 percent, and requires approximately 100 feet retaining wall {approximately 5 high) along each side where it crosses between the wetland edges. Depending on the height of this wall, it may require a railing along the top for safety and to meet code. The proposed grading for the drive would result in a diversion of surface runoff onto the adjacent northern property. Appropriate drainage rights must be secured from the owner of that property. This driveway in combination with the building site and septic field will requiie the removal of approximately .95 acres of woods. The developer should provide more detailed information about the size and type of trees that will bo removed or affected by the development of this lot and drive. Several large maple/basswood t^’ces located along Brown Road S just south of the proposed access point would be removed or affected by the proposed access design. If possible large/significant trees should be preserved and incorporated into the grading design of the Lot 1 and the access point. The Subdivision Regulations indicate that trees shown as retained must be protected and preserved. The root zones of trees and woods to remain are to be fenced and maintained as off limits to construction activities. Any damage to trees to bo preserved is to be treated by trained arborist. Wetlands Encroachment: The nature and source of the wetland boundary shown on the plans was not identified. A field wetland delineation and survey should be provided where the drive crosses or where septic fields are proposed at the minimum 75 foot setback from the wetlands The grading plan shows a -2- 03/14/99 13:50 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU. INC.@003 possible grading encroachment into the 26 feel wetland buffer at the Lot 1 crossing area. LANDSCAPING: In accordance with Section 11.60, Subd. 2 of the Orono Subdivision Regulations, as a requirement of subdivision approval, the City Council may require that the subdivider plant shade trees on the property along the project roads or abutting roads. The requirement calls for planting one shade tree <2 inch caliper) per every forty feet of frontage and identifies that the trees planted shall be long-lived shade trees. I. 2. The entire southern part of the site Is currently an open field with volunteer trees at the fence line along the existing roads. After development, the view from the adjacent streets will be of the rear yards and private spaces of the new homes. The visual appearance of the project as viewed from the public streets and adjacent properties would be improved by the addition of shade trees along the southern 650 feet of Willow Drive, the rear yard of Lot 4 along Brown Road S, and both sides of Carriage Lane. We recommend the City require the developer to plant deciduous shade trees at 50 feet spacing along the right-of-way of Carriage Lane and southern 650 feet of Willow Drive. We also recommend that the City require the developer to plant an evergreen or ornamental tree buffer in the rear vard of Lot 4, and groups of ornamental/overstory trees around the proposed drainage basin in the southwest corner of the site. Lot 2 functions as a flag lot and It will require approximately 150 feet of driveway between the side yards of Lots 3 and 6. The City should require the developer to provide an adequate landscape buffer along the sides of this drive. BUILDING ENCROACHMENT The plans shown an apparent encroachment of two existing buildings onto Lot 4. This encroachment should be verified and appropriately resolved with the adjacent land owner. BFPTin SVSTPM SETBACK The minimum septic field setback from existing wetlands and water bodies is 75 feet. Upon completion, the proposed drainage pond in the southwestern part of the site will act as a small pond or wetland and will drain to the southwest under Willow Drive. The septic field for Lot 6 is setback approximately BO feet from the NWL elevation of this basin. -i- 03/14/99 13:50 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU. INC.1^1004 The septic field locations must be fenced off and protected from construction activities. pRnftIQN CONTROL The developer must ensure that erosion control be provided, monitored and maintained wherever needed until the vegetative cover in the disturbed areas of each lot has been fully and finally restored. If you have questions regarding these comments, or If I can be of further assistance, please call me at 339-3300. DAHLQREN, SHARDLOW, AND UBAN, INC Wallace L. Case, ASIA Landscape Architcct/Planner 03/15/99 .17:04 FAX 6129375S22 WESTWOOD PROF. SERVICES 12)002 WtStwood Professional Services, Inc.w March IS, 1999 'Xy ly 7S99 Antgi*n Of'W U»P Mill*. MN SS344 Mr. Steve Dohl Bohland Development, Inc. 420 Upland Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55447 0.Phonr*12»J7-5150 far SIJ-937 SS2J toll Fim: 1-BU-937-S'-S0 EiM'I »>i»9wMl>Modp«.coni Ref: 98795 Re: Wetland review process for Carriage Hill Renidentlal Development, Orono, MN Dear Steve: This letter is to summari7.e the wetland review process wc initiated last fall for the Carriage Hill Residential Development and identify the actions we will take to complete the wetland review process prior to final approval of tlic proposed development. Westwood Professional Services reviewed the propcrt>' in Uic field inNovemb-T, 1998 to identify existing wetland boundaries and assess the extent to which wetlands constrained site development. The development area includes part of DNR Protected Wetland 27-864W, which we unoerstand will be avoided. A partial wetland delineation was completed in November to Identify wetland boundary locations in selected areas and allow concept planning to advance. Because wc understood that each residential lot must include u minimum of two acres of upland, wc mapped the wetland boundaries that were not delineated. Upland acreage was then calculated for each future residential lot. Wetland boundary mapping was completed In AutoCAD and was based on a combination of field observation of existing conditions, aerial photograph interpretation, and topographic mapping. It will be necessary to complete the wetland review process with the City of Orono and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District before final approvals are obtained. The wetland boundary delineation will bo completed using the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987) and we will request confirmation from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District that the wetland boundaries are acceptable for local administration of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, as amended. Wetland boundary flags will be located by Land Surveyors and the approved wetland delineation will be used to confirm that all proposed residential lots include at least two acres of upland. The Site Plan will be reviewed to ensure it complies with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and City of Orono requirements for wetland buffers and setbacks, respectively. Any concerns that arise at that time will be resolved in coordination with the watershed, city, or other agencies, as appropriate. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this approach. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PROFESSION.AL SERVICES, INC. Robin P. Boutn Senior Environmental Scientist #2467 Dfsigrif 9 tfif Fgry'i 19^2 I V i TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: RE: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator #2467 Bohland Development, having an interest in 1025 Brown Road South (PID# 10-117-23-24-0001) Class III Preliminary Plat Subdivision —Public Hearing Exhibits: A B C D E F Application Plat map Owner's list Zoning map Section Map City Engineer’s report (BLUEPRINTS) G H I J K L Water Quality review Septic Report Topo Map MUSA map Webber Hills project map Preliminary Plat drawings Zoning: RR-IB Comprehensive Plan: One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres, unsewered) Rural Residential Application: The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 45.1 acre parcel lying between Willow Drive South and Brown Road South into 6 parcels for single family residential development. The parcel is located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is planned for rural residential development at 2 acres, according to the Comprehensive Plan. The subdivision will require a conditional use permit for grading within 5' of the property line to create a driveway for Lot 1 and may also require a variance to grade/fill within 26' of the w'etland. The septic sites for Lot 5 may require a variance from the 75' setback from the NURP pond. This application will also require the dedication of right-of-way for Brown Road South :^.iid Willow Diive South. The subdivision is also subject to drainage, flowage and conser\'ation easements for the wetlands. A park dedication fee will also be required. ff2467 Bohland Development Class 111 Subdivision PC-3/15/99 page-l DESCRIPTION OF AREA The proposed subdivision is bordered by Willow Drive South and Brown Road Soi.th. Tht parcel is 45.1 acres with 23 acres of w'etland in the middle of the site. The parcel is located partially within 1000' of Long Lake Creek and within 1000' of French Lake. The surrounding area is fully developed with single family homes that were constructed during the 1900's through the 1950's. TOPOGRAPHY The wetland area in the middle section of the parcel has an elevation below 93 ? The area north of the wetland rises from 932 to 959.2 at its highest elevation. The southern portion of the parcel rises from the 932 elevation to a high point of 967.2. Both the north and soaih areas dr^ into the wetland. The southern portion of the parcel has been used for agricultural purposes and is iUaracteristic of a field. The northern portion of the parcel is heavily wooded. ZONING The parcel is zoned RR-IB, Rural Residential District. The minimum lot area requirement is 2 acres. The minimum setback requirements are noted in the table below. Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Adjacent to Street 2 acres, dry buildable 200'50*50’30'50' Wetland Setback No building, excavation or grading or filling is allowed in or within 26' of the wetlands. The proposed grading for the driveway to Lot 1 appears to encroach into this required setback. Septic Setback The minimum setback requirements for septic systems is 75' from wetlands and water supply wells. Septic systems shall be a minimum of 20' from hardcover surfaces, property lines, buildings and buried pipes. The proposed septic sites for Lot 5 are too close to the NURP pond. The septic sites should be 75' from the NURP pond. §2467 Bohland Development Class 111 Subdivision PC-3/I5/99 page~2 PARCEL INFORMATION Property Identification: The subdivision includes the following parcels: 38 10-117-23 21 0001 38 10-117-23 21 0007 39-10-117-23 24 0001 The above parcels are under the ownership of E.S. Borman and J.E. Corwin. Julius Hendel is listed as the taxpayer. The tax data indicates that it has been previously taxed as vacant residential land. Exception: A 50' by 200' strip of wetland is shown as an exception along the east property line of the proposed subdivision. This parcel of land was tax-forfeited in 1982 to the State of Minnesota. It was conveyed to the City of Orono for drainage purposes. Greg Gappa, Public Services Director, has indicated that it is not needed by the City. If the City made this parcel available to the {^plicant, the entire wetland area west of Brown Road South could be included in a conservation and flowage easement agreement. Proposed Lots: U2467 Bohland Development Class III Subdivision PC-3/15/99 page-3 LOT INFORMATION I 1 Lot Total Dry 1 20.8 acres 5.7 acres 2 9.3 acres 3.6 acres 3 4.4 acres 2 acres 4 2.3 acres 2 acres 5 2.4 acres 2 acres 6 2 acres 2 acres Lot Area: Wetlands: NURP: Net Dry Buildable Area: 45.1 acres 23.4 acres .4 acres 21.3 acres The proposed subdivision creates six lots that meet the minimum lot area requirements of 2 acres of dry buildable land. Loti Lot 1 is the largest parcel with 20.8 acres total with 5.7 acres dry buildable. Due to the configuration of Lot 1 and access from King Street, Lot 1 may not be fruther subdivided. A portion of Lot 1 is located within 1000' of Long Lake Creek. This part of the lot is subject to hardcover requirements. No more than 35% of the lot area in this setback from Long Lake Creek may be hardcover. Access to Lot 1 is proposed by constructing a private driveway in King Street. The City Engineer questions whether two separate driveways should be allowed next to each other instead of a shared driveway. The amount of grading to install a driveway also requires review by MCWD because there may be an impact on the wetland. Construction easements and retaining walls may also be necessary. Because this is not ordinary and customary gn-ding next to a property line, a conditional use permit in addition to a land alteration permit will be necessary. Lot 2 Lot 2 is a 9.3 acre parcel with 3.6 acres dry buildable. The proposed lot could not be further subdivided. The lot will have frontage on Willow Drive, however, access shall not be allowed via Willow Drive. Therefore, the setback from Willow Drive should be considered a side yard adjacent to street. The proposed subdivision indicates that this lot will be served by an outlot (148* x 30') from the cul-de-sac. Tlie City Engineer recommends that the City discuss whether this is acceptable. The odd shaped lot creates a problem for determining how to define the yards and corresponding setbacks. Should this lot be considered a backlot because it is behind the existing residence on Willow Drive and served via an outlot from the cul-de-sac? Septic sites on this lot will need to be at least 75' from the wetljuid. Lot 3 Lot 3 is 4.4 acres with 2 acres dry buildable. This lot cannot be further subdivided. It is proposed to be served by the cul-de-sac. The septic sites need to be 20' from the property lines and 75' from the wetland. The outlot that provides access to Lot 2 will require that a 50' setback be provided next to the outlot. U2467 Bohland Development Class III Subdivision PC--3/15/99 page—4 Lot 4 Lot 4 is an odd-shaped lot that is technically considered a through lot because it has potential access from Brown Road. This lot also surrounds the exception that should be sold to the developer and included in the lot. Lot 4 is proposed to be served by the cul-de-sac. The final resolution should state that no access will be allowed from Brown Road. Lots t Lot 5 is proposed to be 2.4 acres with 2 acres dry buildable. This lot is proposed to have the NURP pond. It is also proposed to be served by the cul-de-sac even though it has potential access from both Willow Drive and the private road, "Carriage Lane". A.cess shall be prohibited from Willow Drive and the driveway for this lot shall be from Carriage Lane, not the cul-de-sac. Lot 6 Lot 6 is proposed to be 2 acres of dry buildable land. This lot has frontage on Willow Drive and Carriage Lane. The driveway is proposed from the cul-de-sac. The driveway shall be installed from Carriage Lane and access from Willow Drive shall be prohibited. This lot will be subject to two side yard adjacent to street setbacks, from Willow Drive and the outlot/cul-de-sac. The septic sites need to be at least 20’ from the property lines. ACCESS The subdivider proposes access for Lot 1 to be provided via a driveway in King Street. King Street is platted as a dead end street. Currently there is a driveway in King Street that serves 775 Brown Road South (Simpson residence). The subdivider is proposing to construct a driveway next to the existing driveway. The City Engineer has raised concerns about this proposal. (See Exhibit F). The other five lots are proposed to be served by a private road, "Carriage Hill Lane", from Willow Drive South. Lots 2, S, and 6 have frontage on Willow Drive, however, access shall not be allowed from these lots directly to Willow Drive. Lots 1 and 4 also have possible access to Brown Road. Access to Lot 1 shall be from King Street and Lot 4 shall not be allowed to have a driveway curb cut on Brown Road. The subdivider has shown Lots 3,4, 5, and 6 as having driveways from the cul-de-sac. Lots 5 and 6 should be served from Carriage Hill Lane. Lot 2 is proposed to have access from an outlot platted at 148' in length and 30' in width. The City Engineer has concerns about an outlot being platted from the cul-de-sac. §2467 Bohland Development Class III Subdivision PC-3/15/99 page-5 Carriage Hill Lane shall be platted at a 50' right-of-way with a paved width of 24'. The length of the private road is approximately 350' from Willow Drive South to the center of the cul-de-sac in conformance with the subdivision requirements. STORMWATER MA'.^.GEMENT The subdivider has proposed a NURP pond in the comer of Lot 5. The proposed location of the NURP pond is too close to the property line. It should be at least 55' from the property line so that a septic site on the adjacent property could be located 20' from the property line without requiring a variance. Allowing the NURP pond to be located on or adjacent to the property line impacts the adjacent property’s ability to locate a septic site in the future. The NURP pond is also too close to the septic sites for Lot 5 and does not have an adequate bench of 10:1. Septic sites are required to be at least 75' from a wetland or pond. The City Engineer has recommended that the storm sewer be constructed to route storm flows from the street to the pond. All storm pipes are recommended to be reinforced concrete pipes instead of corrugated metal pipes. The pond needs to have an outlet structure that provides 1' of skimming to remove floatables and debris. Permanent erosion control should be installed downstream from the pond to prevent sedimentation into French Lake. SEPTIC SYSTEMS The parcel is not within the MUSA line. The Crystal Bay sewer project is to the south of the proposed subdivision. The Webber Hills sanitary sewer project is proposed for the area to the north of this subdivision. On-site septic systems are proposed for this development. The septic sites are required to be 75' from the wetlands and NURP pond and at least 20' from property lines and hardcover. Staff has not been able to verify the septic information because the ground is still frozen. This preliminary plat shall not move forward until Steve Weekman, On-Site Septic Systems Manager, has been able to approve each proposed primary and secondary site. Any site that does not meet the City’s requirements may require that the preliminary plat and proposed lots lines and ponding area be revised. DEDICATIONS The subdivider shall be required to dedicate 33' of right-of-way for Brown Road (County Road 146) and 66' of right-of-way for Willow Drive. This will leave Outlot A separated from the proposed M2467 BoMand Development Class III Subdivision PC-3/I5/99 page~6 subdivision. Outlet A should be made available to the abuttting property at 845 Willow Drive South for legal access. EASEMENTS The subdivider shall provide standard drainage and utility easements along interior and exterior property lines (5* interior and 10' exterior). The subdivider shall also provide drainage, conservation and flowage easements across the wetland. Road and utility easements and maintenance agreements will be required for the private road, Carriage Hill Lane. VEGETATION MAP The subdivision ordinance provides in Section 11.60 for the preservation of natural features and amenities. The subdivider shall provide a vegetation map that shows the number and location of existing trees on site to be preserved. The ordinance provides that the City may require the subdivider to provide shade trees along the perimeter of the subdivision; one shade tree may be planted every 40 feet. The proposed preliminary plat has been sent to Wally Case, DSU landscape architect for review. His comments will be provided at the Planning Commission meeting. The Park Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary plat at their March meeting and requested land for a buffer strip along Willow Drive to plant trees for screening of the houses from the road. However, staff does not recommend that the City accept land for tree planting. Staff prefers to wait for the landscape architect's recommendation for screening and buffering in accordance with the subdivision ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION To review and discuss: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. King Street and proposed driveway, grading, filling and conditional use permit Lot configuration and setbacks Proposed access, driveways and outlot Septic sites and setbacks from NURP pond Design and setback for NURP pond Vegetation and landscaping Outlot A and exception area #2467 Bohland Development Class III Subdivision PC-3/15/99 page-7 A Application # Date Received 2-1 7-?7 Amount Paid L '^6S^ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address Property Identification Number (PID) Please check one - Property yc abstract or Attach legal description to application. torrens? 00c7 te l( 7 Ctc l i APPLICANT Name Address City __ Lf'\t _ _____\ / ^ \ »x V^»^i____________ ( (, y. * * • Phone (home) ~7;»0 ___Phone (work) /Zip ^wv-7 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name S«-• Address City Zip Phone (home) Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels • 1 Jg.c<^V Residential; no. of units____ Other (specify) ',-U Present Zoning District '* .fj < .. '2/ PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites O___Existing Units ^___New Units Total Units Number of Building Sites 5P"*. Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) __ __Units per ^ Acres 2 r-e . Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land ^ A ^ A A / Residential Other (specify) \ MITOMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPUCATION 1. P^'TOCot of fees (refer to "application fees" listed below. 2. Completed application form. 3. Preliminary plat information on Certificate of Surv^. ** Go^^C ct U t M8 327 0 Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 5. As an addendum to this application, please attach a wparate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application Zonmg Official’s Signature__________________________________ Date MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FINAL APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (refer to Preliminary Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit Zoning Official’s Signature _______________________________ Date L APPLICA’TION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check pC] those which apply) A. Application Base Fees: _____ Sketch Plan Review (Class I, n & III) $250.(X) _____ Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement S3S0.00 I Subdivision Application (Class I & II) $350.(X) _____Preliminary Subdivision Application $375.00 + $25.00/lot (Class UI & all non-residenlial) _____Final Plat Application (Class III) $200.00 _____Legal Review and Filing: _____Subdivision only $75.00 _____Subdivision w/easements and covenants mia $200.00 t: ! Totals 330r Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) Legal and Engineering Review Fees (as incurred) Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change from original application) Renewal of Class III, Preliminary Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change fiom original application) Renewal of Final Class m Subdivision Application $150.00 (No change fiom original application) B. Special Improvement Fees: _____ Proposed Private Roads $6(X).00 + $.50/lineal ft.; Proposed Public Roads $900.00 $.50/lineal ft.; . lin. ft. X .50 “ $. lin. ft. X .50 » $ I Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $900.00 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.00 + $25/stub Proposed Watermain Extension $250.00 + $25/stub Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) $200.00 On-Site System, Site Eviduation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $50.00/per lot x new lots I • C. Flexible Application Fees/Misc. Fees ■ Variance $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) _____ Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision $ 100.00 _____ PRD Application with Subdivision $30.00/Dwelling Unit 3^0 The cpplicanl hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested b>’ the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Co^il nje^ssa^to ^es^^tfU\application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant’s Signature Owner’s Signature _ Date IrzAx Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City Office 25 days before the Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Conunission and Council. If an appliemt is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. f • RHCSiVED MIR 2 3 1999 CViY 0h0i\0 Application # Date Rcceived3Z^^^^II Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address S Type of Application to be Filed C*oa4. Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) t-4-4-%e.Cv*,(______________ APPLICANT ^ ^ ' Name Oe Phone (home) V7C Address «4>o Opl*>^»( t r\ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _____ Phone (work) C JP ^ City ______Zip ^ V "> Phone (home). Phone (work). Address City Date Property Acquired___________________________________ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _____$ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____$175.00 Residential Accessory Use _____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _____$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use . • i ^ V $250.00 Land Alteration vWh«V% ^ of ^rOf>e.yhf ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore _____PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule _____$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from ori^nal application) _____After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application ree OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation _____$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule Zip. (month/year) V - j cy REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350’, labels and plat map (you must obtain this lik, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons wth an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11” X 17” OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:________________________ Date__________ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unu?B»al expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledgi. s and agrees to this application and fiirther authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff) consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to anend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. •nr unn'■nr ^ (I) RO • Uxrs^ I (It) (a) a • % % • 9 • m * 9 • 9 t m m • • • • % m m • • 4 • ^ 0 • • » • • • • ^ • • • * • • m 9 • • m % % m • • r« «■■•••■•••••«••••«••■■«• • • «Da> • • •■••••••■«•«••• • •*■*■*• •*•*• •*•*»*•*# • • •*• «•••••••««•«•••••< 4909900a9499040099»99wm9m9ma90mm9a»a0aa90mmmB099m4 MU • lUl ‘ [fi^ u« 1 (M) AODt j^’T- -Ay 9000000000000000900 0 00009009009000009000000009000 00000900000000000 0 M 0 •••• cftattttaa**^**** •• ■ 9^0 t*t*a*t*w^«*****»*«"**ft*t*«*a**^A^*«*a"**ft*%^*#***«*»*a*t*a*r •*•*#"•*■*•*• « a***»*#*t^**« »%»«•%•»«•»••••■•» ft A^%T 0 i » a. t « 1 ««•■«#•••■■•••«••%• tOr 0 0 4 • •••••••«••••••■■•••«••OC •••••••• ••••••■•«•■••«« - »« •••««•«•••••* •«•««•••« ■ « I •••taa*aa«*aa«*«aa*aaa*tXa^aata*a***t**a*****a*aa0 0 9 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 4900000000940009009000009090009499040099000904490 ,0009909900000900990909000900009000009090090040049 ,% 0040m0009909000%9049000P9000900000090040909049m4 ,4 090900040m999000»09490099909990a9000000099^00094 1 9 0 0 9 0 0 4 0 0 4 M 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 • 4 4 9 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 W a 0 9 9 0 m00M0449mmwm4m990M4mm0Mmm9a9994mm99mm4m%9mM409m00 vm 4 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 9 4 4 9 4 4 9 9 0 4 9 0 0 0 4 0 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 JK 9 9 0 9 9 0 \ 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 4 9 0 9 9 9 0 M 0 9 9 0 9 0 a 9 0^ 994444044049094 M 9 0 4 0 0 4 0 & \'^AM •••«««aat«««»««atftcat«*t««*««***«tt« jTa ««•*•«■ r ^ ftftftftftaaftftftftsflvaftftftft 0 j^9 •• •«•••■«••• v* «*«•••■• V Vt%»»t»*«ft«»a«%*tt«fta»ft iL* •■•■%»%■%•%«%«•««- ' - . \ \m 0490909900090000 0 9090 « JT • “^0' \ T« ^ M # •••••«• «V ■ (tz) \ m.X Cl«SS«• ^ t I ^ t (Z) t i * *t I 0 M * /« !0- U 7.c^3- Oj % w zr»'s,! #.V.(•) (V -jr "‘X t. • - i 'At aBUtEOMC TT3i )■< V* (14), / •9^ § \ BL f*^4P^r *(«»• « 3 90 S'" i &s ly iS CM a CM md I m4e 10 40 _ 30ui oe a Q o H as u. li. • I/) <0 _ =a33S5 -sssa> Si s h- «0 UJ M CM S > o ly z O U X S 1*1 »o ® 5» ^ii _ lii y CO Qc < lA > M O M e «j u CM X a ?i- s=i I H f-l X 0 CO ;S8 t: fO z t N X H X H 1 *18 sSi! p>4 lO CO Ml UJ to X o UI X X X UI S“5i ““S< UI UI to M « > c, €d tniu as “ — fO zCM r * p N X X H X i 5^ X olO •H < UIuo to ^ HI H ^ U 90 M X X X _ X »- O I* X K He X S S H X s PO ^ M ! & £ >8 Ul K O' Xo* X CVJ 01 01 Ul m m 0) J5“ .oS CM .1 I mi :i^ I O'rH H Ul Ul M M mi ml Mr o *<*"SU-lg« s“Ss «-d*a-s?-•s.ao > a o H ^ Ul h* lO CMpnu> III o o! P • 01 ^ 01 SSu"’ CM S H KS H u S * M •• I . Ul X I.J S III oi ^ S K SxioSS Rg-^8iLg S^i Ul h- s in s|«O Z Ul ^ < > N U K a. Ul o. X i N < -I Ul 01 lii S * X z Sgoico g-*“10 O Ul CM «J M I K I rC O' lOut HI -I M lU _as».2| tt X .1 _ s”SS M O O fH > M O O M X Ui O X 0 Q ^ ^ ^1 ^ d o z K M X X o ^ S mj M X X ^ • M S O S M O' X Xo o vHo 01 OI HI X HI o* S O' >o < rH X X Ul CM rH a. 01 O Z rH X C9 O' O O X M O) to CM _ Ul Ul HI Visa* K M 10 M O rH Z mi rH .1 X i X H K III N X X X X > II a? Is c ^3# CM PO H X Ul Ul 01 HI X S CM I __“9S —M CO CO O z rH rH I < -I ^ ®sCM M M X N CM > •H < rH Z «x ssM Ul lU M ^a«2 S ui rH X fO HI HI I X _ K < < rH ^ X X 01 O) h{ < X << miH rHX^^ < XlO CM CO CD X N CM 5 5 CM >rH S Q CM < O 5 5 rH Z €0 rH Xo o tii ' ~ mi rH X 01 lO HI X HI CM I mi K M rH Z rH I rH HI O fH • rH to X Ul Ul ^ •■“•ss Ul Ul X 00 IB S Z s Z X < > V X < o o HI ►-o H Ul >X O Q ^dui^S rH Z > rH < X ^ I M M X rH X Kl HI X HI Si rH Hin < HI Ul HI N X X ^ HI > X rH X O < X X O O rH Z Kl K) Kl CM X ti\ o o CM jfljg X S M X CM -I ^ Q I O Si K M M rH Z Z X ^ rH U -I I Z > M *s > Ul rH X O -I X X rH X M X rH Z X e X X K O X X > rH X rH U KI X X o Ul < >• V Ul .O K X X O Ul pdel I1 L Ma. 1/ d, ZONJIMfir MA.P R*1A 0n« Fjr R10 Ont Far LR*1A Ona Far r 26SSw4? RCS w ^ BorwOn ^ “»''■ (^ (i'll 2 tlTf MS 1MT ODWISfO«tlC TO iff 5. &i I. MUKicNu vtn flOl VACATIO StAOT MO «UD ^ i Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & |\] I Associates Engineers & Architects March 9. 1999 Elizabeth VanZomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Carriage Hill Subdivision File No. 139-2467 Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderhk and Associates. Inc is an Affirmative Action/iqua! Opportunity Employer Principals: Otto G Bonestroo. PE • Joseph C. Anderliic. PE. • Marvin L. Sorvala. PE • Richard E Turner. PE • Glenn R. Cook. PE • Robert G Schunicht. PE • Jerry A. Bourdon, PE • Robert W Rosene. PE. and Susan M. Eberlin. C PA.. Senior Consultants Associate Principals Howard A. Sanford. PE • Keith A Gordon. PE • Robert R. Pfeffcrie. PE • Richard W Foster PE • David O Loskota. PE • Robert C. Russek. A I A. • Mark A. Hanson. P.E. • Michael T. Rautmann. PE • Ted K Field. PE • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R Rolfs. PE. • Sidney P Vt'illiamson. PE . LS. • Robert F. Koismiih • Agnes M. Ring • Michael P Rau. PE. • Allan Rick Schmidt, PE Offices St. Paul. Rochester. Wilimar and St Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl WePsite www.bonestroo.com Dear Liz: We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed six lot Carriage Hill subdivision. The site is located west of Brown Road South (C.R. 146), east of Willow Drive and south of the Webber Hills neighborhood in the northwest quarter of Section 10. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1. Access: The proposed access location for Carriage Lane appears acceptable. We recommend that Carriage Lane be constructed to a 24-foot paved width in accordance with City standards for a private street serving 3 to 6 units. We also recommend that Carriage Lane be an urban street section with concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer. The City should review and determine whether the 150-foot driveway across Outlot B to Lot 2 is acceptable. Final plans should include a typical street section for both Carriage Lane and the driveway to Lot 1. Access to Lot I along King Street is adjacent to an existing driveway serving the property to the north. Does it make sense to have two separate driveways side by side or would a combined access be more appropriate? The proposed plan for the access to Lot 1 appears to require some extensive grading. Construction easements or retaining walls may be required to construct this access. It also appears that the construction of this access will impact the wetland and wetland buffer. Plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MC M)) for their review. Geotechnical recommendations and street design should be provided for our review. 2. Grading: A grading and erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any grading, particularly along the wetland and ponding area. Additional erosion control will be needed during construction of the houses and septic systems. CHf. n»kii pi^ reirvfcrotdi cerverefe Ape. 3. Drainage: As stated in # 1 above, we recommend that storm sewer should be constructed to route storm flows from the street to the pond. Based on the drainage calculations submitted, it appears that the existing 12-inch CMP under Willow Drive will remain in place. The CMP will act in conjunction with the proposed 15-inch CMP. We reconunend that all storm pipes be RCP rather than CMP. We recommend that the pond have an outlet structure that provides 1-foot of skimming to remove floatabies and debris. Some Type of permanent erosion control measures should be installed downstream from the pond to prevent sedimentation in French Lake. We have attached additional comments from our water resources department regarding water quantity and quality. 4. Utilities: City sewer exists just south of the site on Willow Drive. The City should review and determine whether they intend to ever provide sewer service to this area. 5. Easements: Final platting should include 33 feet of dedicated right-of-way for C.R. 146 and 66 feet of dedicaicd right-of-way for Willow Drive. Does Outlot A have any impact on access to the lot south of Willow Drive? The drainage and utility easements shown appear to be acceptable. Additional easements may be required if sanitary sewer is provided. 6. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we will prepare an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 65!*636 ’4600 ■ Fax; 651-636'1311 Please contact me at 651-604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. /o^ Tom Kellogg Memo ij\t Bonestroo ^2 Rosene vv Anderlik& |\J| Associates 4 A/chlt«<tf Project Name: Carriage Hill Development Client: CityofOrono To: Tom Kellogg File No: 139gen-#2467 From: Heather A. Olson Date: March 3, 1999 Re: Stormwater quantity and quality review Remarks: General This review concerns the Carriage Hill development as detailed in the plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services Inc. dated 2/19/99. This site is located east of Willow Drive in the northwest quarter of section 10. The site consists of six 2+ acre lots located on approximately 45 acres. The site will drain west under Willow Drive into the wetland surrounding French Lake. Water Quality The proximity of this development to both French Lake and the adjacent wetlands, increases the importance of erosion control and treatment for the runoff from this site. We offer the following recommendations. 1. Heavy-duty silt fencing should be installed on each lot along the construction limits. All silt fencing shall remain intact until there is vegetation established on the entire site. 2. The rear yard drainage from lots 1,2,3 and 4 drain into the adjacent wetland without being treated. A 26’ wetland buffer has been indicated on the plan, please submit a typical section and description for City staff to review. 3. There is some concern for the drainfield/septic system located on Lot 5 block 1. It appears to encroach upon the proposed water quality ponding. It is recommended that the ordinance for the 75’ offset be enforced for this ponding area. The discharge from this drainfield will Impact the nutrient loading within the proposed pond which outlets into French Lake. The soil borings should also bo submitted for city staff to review. Bonestroo, Rosene, Andertik and Associates 1 2335 West Highway 36 # St. Paul. MN 55113 # Phone:651-636-4600# Fax:651-636-1311 Memo Bonestroo Rdsene ■ Anderfik & |\j| Associates fngln««rt & Arctilt^ctf 4. Excavation of temporary sedimentation ponds and the use of BMPs should be in place during each lot construction to reduce the erosion to the adjacent wetland. ^ f Water Quantity The topography of this site prevents the entire site to drain to a single ponding area. We offer the following recommendations: 1. It is recommended that the Impervious surfaces, (house, driveway, and yard) and any land disturbed during construction be routed to drain into the street and Into the proposed ponding area. This will reduce the amount of untreated runoff draining directly to the adjacent wetland. 2. The 100-year HWL for the proposed pond does not seem to provide sufficient freeboard for Willow ■ Road. The elevation of the low point on Willow Road should be established and submitted to city staff. 3. The cover for the outlet structure under Willow Road should be evaluated. 4. It is difficult to determine from the grading plan whether a maintenance bench above the pond NWL is being provided. At a minimum there should be one provided around Inlets, outlets, and at any point where dredging operations might occur. 5. The ponding area should also have a 10:1 aquatic bench at the ponds NWL The ponding area illustrated on the plans does not appear to have this feature. 6. The installation of an Emergency Over Flow (E.O.F.) is recommended for this pond. The E.O.F. should provide overland drainage for the pond during storms that exceed the 100-year event, and or when the outlet structure becomes obstructed. The EOF should protect adjacer-; nomes and roadways. Bone»troo, Rosene, Andwtik and Associates 2335 West Highway 36 # St. Paul, MN 55113# Phone: 651-636-4600 # Fax: 651-636-1311 TO;Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator FROM:Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager DATE:March 4,1999 SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2467,Carriage Hill - Subdivision The proposed six lot subdivision requires the use of on-site sewage treatment systems. Site evaluation/design has been completed for primary and alternate drainfield sites on each lot. Due to frozen gound conditions, staff can't verify the accuracy of the soil borings or recommend approval of the subdivision at this time. The information submitted by Westwood Professional Services identifies two drainfield sites on each property meeting all City and State standards. Staff approval of the septic plan will be granted once the City can verify the soil information and complete system design information is submitted by Westwood. The stormwater drainage pond on the southwest comer of the property must be redesigned to meet a 55 foot setback from the property line to the highwater mark. The setback is required to eliminate future setback conflicts when septic system upgrades are required on adjoining properties. Based on the above information, staff recommends approval of the application on the condition that the soil information is verified by Staff and all final septic system design information is provided. The city requires the drainfield sites to be fenced off prior to any grading or land alteration. Mli I COMMUNICATIONS.MEDIA DIVISION 'V d . Date of Application: 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60 day limit: 4/17/99 ^ /%C/7> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: ITEM NO.: // Department Approval: Name Liz Van Zomeren Title City Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: ^2471 Independent Orono School District ^278 New Middle School 800 Old Crystal Bay Road Conditional Use Permit for Middle School with Athletic Fields as an accessory use & a conditional use permit for land alteration (14,000 cubic yards) to grade site Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Lot Area:51.39 acres Application: The School District is also requesting a conditional use permit to construct a new middle school to serve 675 students on the vacant land north of the student center, east of Old Crystal Bay Road. This site will be assigned the address "800 Old Crystal Bay Road". The site is currently divided into four parcels with an outlot. The School District is required to legally combine the lots into one tax parcel and the City needs to vacate its easements over Outlot A. The middle school is a conditional use in the RR-IB zoning district. The athletic fields are an accessory use to the school. To prepare the site for new construction, a conditional use permit is also required for grading where 14,000 cubic yards is expected to be altered. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has prepared two approval resolutions, one for each site. The issues with each site are addressed in the resolution and reviewed below. §1471 Orono Middle School 800 Old Crystal Bay Road Conditional Use Permit AprU 12. 1999 page~l 1 i Date of Application: 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60 day limit: 4/17/99 Middle School Number and Age of Students The approval resolution limits the number of students to 675 students in grades 6-8. This limitation on the grades served and the total number of students is related to parkir^. The Zoning Code's parking requirements correspond to the number of students and classrooms. Any increase in the number of students served may require additional parking and bus loading facilities. Any change in the grades served may change the number of parking spaces required. For example, adding students that are older that are able to drive may require additional parking areas. Parking The approval resolution references the Zoning Code's requirement for parking stall size for each type of space to be provided. The parking lot will need to be striped to meet this requirement. This included in the resolution so that the number of parking spaces is not diminished over time. The grade of the parking area is to be 4%. In some areas of Ae parking lot, 5% was proposed. The Public Services Director and City's landscape architect consultant recommend 4% Large paved areas that are have greater slopes become icy in the winter time and can also increase the speed of stormwater runoff. The difference between 4% and 5% is shown below: Parking Lot Lighting: The proposed lighting plan shows 35' light standards in the parking areas. The lights for the vehicle parking lot area are centered in the middle of the parking aisle. The lights for the bus staging area are located along the walkway. The two lights in the parking area need to be located in islands for safety and to reduce the visual impact of the parking area. The City Council needs to review the lighting plan and discuss the allowed height for the lighting standards, the cutoff angle and the amount of illumination measured in footcandles. Glare and light trespass are to be minimized and no uplight shall be produced. The applicant needs to provide a lighting plan that complies with the City's Council direction. §2471 Orono Middle School 800 Old Crystal Bay Road Conditional Use Permit April 12. 1999 page-2 d Date of Application: 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60 day limit: 4/17/99 Play Fields and Athletic Fields The school's plan shows soccer and baseball fields. The landscape architect has noted that the orientation of the fields will cause glare on goal. The Zoning Code requires play fields for schools to be fenced with the fence located at least 15’ from the property line. Fences are appropriate for smaller sites and for day care or nursery schools. Given the size of the campus, staff has not recommended that the City require fences at this time. However, the resolution includes reserving the ability to revisit the need for fences when the area to the east of the fields is developed for residential uses. Signage The applicant has not provided drawings or sketches to indicate how the building or entrances will be signed. The Zoning Code limits signage in residential areas to a nameplate sign with 12 sq. ft. of surface area. Given the size of the building and the lot area, more signage may be requested. A variance will be required if the amount of proposed signage exceeds the Code requirement. Building Size The approval resolution indicates the size of the building, the number of stories, and the footprint. If the building footprint is enlarged or the use of the building changes an amendment or new conditional use permit may be required because the number of classrooms corresponds to required parking. Walkway Ughting The applicant has provided a lighting plan to illuminate the pedestrian paths around the bus staging area and the east side of the school and the drop-off area. The height of the light standard and the allowed cut-off angle and footcandles need to be discussed by the City Council and further clarified on the lighting plan. Landscaping Plan The City's landscape architect, Wally Case of DSU, has reviewed the landscaping plan. His recommendations are incorporated in the approval resolution with the areas to be landscaped and the type and quantity of trees identified. He also recommends plantings in parking islands to §2471 Oroiio Middle School 800 Old Crystal Bay Road Conditional Use Permit April 12. 1999 page-3 i 4 Date of Application: 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60 day limit: 4/17/99 reduce the visual impact of the parking areas. The applicant shall provide a Master Landscape Plan for the school campus with a planting schedule that can be phased over several years. The landscape plan should provide both overstory and understory trees that have a variety of colors to provide seasonal interest. The landscaping plan should visually connect the schools building and campus. Pedestrian Traffic The City Engineer and Public Services Director recommend that pedestrian traffic be limited to the south driveway curb cut access point for best visibility and safety concerns. The approval resolution addresses the City's interest in installing a traffic signal. Sanitary Sewer, Water and Stormwater Management The site is located within the MUSA line and will be connected to the sanitary sewer system and City water tower. The Metropolitan Council determines the required number of sewer units. The current sewer and water connection charge is $8,900 per unit. A sewer availability charge of $1,050 per unit must also be paid prior to building permit approval. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and his comments for sewer, water, and stormwater management plan specifications and details are outlined in the approval resolution. Easements Vacation of Outlot A The City currently has easements over Outlot A. These easements need to be vacated to assemble the site into one tax parcel. Staff has sent a memo to the City Attorney requesting assistance in preparing a legal document that vacates these easements and any other legal issues with the developer's agreement that the City made with the School District concerning this property. Utility Easement The applicant shall provide a 20' utility easement for a future water main extension, as described in the City Engineer's memo. Drainage and Conservation Easements The applicant shall provide easements over all drainage areas, wetlands, and the stormwater pond. §2471 Orono Middle School 800 Old Crystal Bay Road ComMoml Use Permit April J2. 1999 page-^ r P Date of Application: 2/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 60 day limit: 4/17/99 The applicant must also obtain the required approvals and permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Trail Easements The applicant shall provide a temporary and permanent easement for the Hennepin Parks trail. Lot Combination The applicant has initiated the process to legally combine the four lots and the outlot into one tax parcel. The applicant will need to provide proof of the lot combination with a new parcel identification number. A correct legal description will also be required for filing with Hennepin County. Letter of Credit The City Engineer has recommended a letter of credit at 150% for the site improvements. The City Council will need to discuss this with the applicant, as it may have not been programmed by the School District. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: To approve the application, subject to incorporation of the recommendations of staffs memo and further subject to review and approval of a lighting plan, landscaping plan, parking and circulation, and allowed height. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; amend or adopt the enclosed resolution to approve a conditional use permit for a new school and to alter land by moving, grading or filing 14,000 cubic yards of fill. Attachments §2471 Onmo Middle School 900 Old Qystai Bay Road Conditional Use Permit AprU 12. 1999 page-5 f I pWfitti A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MIDDLE SCHOOL AT 800 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH FOR ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #278 PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUED. 3 AND SECTION 10.03, SUED. 19-21 FILE #2471 WHEREAS, Orono Independent School District #278, (hereinafter "the applicant") on February 17, 1999, filed an application for a conditional use permit to allow construction of a new middle school to serve 675 students in grades 6-8 and for land alteration to grade/fill with 14,000 cubic yards of fill for property located at 800 Old Crystal Bay Road North within the City of Orono (hereinafter " City") and legally described as; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Outlot A, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Orono School Expansion, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to construct a new 2-story building with a 72,976 sq. ft. footprint and approximately 115,000 sq. ft. of floor area for a new middle school serving 675 students in grades 6-8 per Section 10.28, Subd. 3, and to allow land alteration of the site by moving, grading or filling requiring approximately 14,000 cubic yards of fill per Section 10.03, Subd. 19-21. WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with the City of Orono ’s Zoning Code, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 15, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on April 12, 1999, the Orono City Council considered the application noting the following findings of fact: Page 1 of 11 i t, 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. }?. 9. FINDINGS: This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2471. The property is located in the RR-IB, One Family Rural Residential District. The property contains 2,238,631 sq. ft. or 51.3919 acres. The Orono Comprehensive Plan land use map designates this area as "Rural Residential" adjacent to "Institutional". The parcel is also designated as being located in urban service area and is within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Schools are a conditional use in the RR-IB Zoning District. The proposed middle school conforms to the minimum lot area, lot width, and front yard setback. No building is proposed to be located closer than 50 ’ to any lot line. The proposed middle school is approximately 72,976 sq. ft. footprint and 115,000 sq. ft. of floor area in a two story building. The building height is 32-42* above grade where 2 1/2 stories or 30’ is the maximum allowed building height. The proposed middle school plan includes athletic fields as an accessorv use. V'>e Zoning Code requires schools to provide 1 parking space for every 7 students 1 additional space for every 3 classrooms. The Zoning Code requires a minimum of 96 parking spaces for the number of students and an additional 30 parking spaces for classrooms. The minimum parking requirement is 126 spaces. The proposed plan provides 121 spaces and 5 additional handicapped spaces for a total of 126 spaces. The amount of parking proposed meets the minimum parking requirements for a middle school in the RR-IB Zoning District. The proposed school plan provides a bus staging area for 25 school buses. This area can accommodate an additional 100 parking spaces when not used for bus parking. Page 2 of 11 i . I 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. The Zoning Code requires 2 loading berths, one 25 ’ in length and one 50 ’ in length. The proposed plan provides a loading berth in the service area and a drop- ofi/loading area for students and small truck deliveries. The proposed plan meets the intent of the Zoning Code regarding loading berths. The topography of the site is relatively flat with numerous non Orono protected wetlands. The elevation changes from 1,034 ’ at the southwest comer to 1,000 ’ in the wetland areas. The Zoning Code requires a 26 ’ wetland setback. The proposed plan includes grading and filling for constmction of the middle school and play fields. A stormwater management pond is required. Approximately .902 acres of wetland will be filled. A land alteration permit is required to grade/fill approximately 14,000 cubic yards. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MC\^) has jurisdiction over these wetlands and will require review and approval of the grading and filling in or near the non Orono wetlands. Sanitary sewer and City water will be extended to the site. Access to the proposed middle school is to be provided by two driveways from Old Crystal Bay Road North. The new middle school complex will be on the east side of Old Crj'stal Bay Road North across the road from the high school complex. This will re.sult in increased pedestrian crossing of Old Crystal Bay Road. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow land alteration and a new middle school will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general w'elfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 3 of 11 t . w (. 17.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the conditional use permit for the Orono Middle School, 800 Old Crystal Bay Road North, per Section 10.28, Subd. 3 and per Section 10.03, Subd. 19-21, per the plans dated ___________ and most revised ______________, subject to the following conditions: CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS 1.The number of enrolled students attending the middle school shall not exceed 675 students in grades 6-8. Any increase in the number of students or the grades served shall require an amendment to the conditional use permit, because the number of students is used to determine required parking. 2.The number of parking spaces provided shall be a minimum of 121 parking spaces with 5 handicapped spaces for a total number of 126 spaces. The parking spaces shall measure at least 9’ x 20’. The handicapped spaces shall measure at least 10 ’x20’. The parking area shall not be reduced per the plans dated_______and most revised Any reduction or change in the configuration of the parking area, including the bus staging area shall require an amendment to the conditional use permit. Any change to the number or age of students served shall require a review by the City Engineer of the parking and circulation plan and may require an amendment to the conditional use permit. The parking area shall have a maximum grade of 4%. The parking lot areas shall include landscaped islands to reduce visual impact of the paved areas. The interior light fixtures shall be located in islands for safety purposes. Page 4 of 11 * ; * I 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The athletic and play fields shall be considered accessory uses to the middle school. The athletic and play fields shall not be illuminated. The applicant shall not be required to fence the athletic play fields. The City of Orono reserves the right to review the need to fence the play fields, as required by Section _______________when the residentially-zoned property to the east develops. The Zoning Code allows one (1) nameplate sign with 12 sq. ft. of surface area. The sign height is to be lower than 8 ’ in height and at least 5’ from the property line. Any signage that is proposed that exceeds the Zoning Code requirements shall require a variance. The proposed building is a two story building with a 72,976 sq. ft. footprint and approximately 115,000 sq. ft. of floor area as shown in the plans dated ______^and most revised_____. Any changes to the use, intensity of use or size of the building shall require a conditional use permit amendment because the number of parking spaces may need to be increased. The Zoning Code requires that the lighting not have a direct source of light visible from the right-of-way or adjacent land. The parking area and walkways shall be illuminated with ____(number of light fixtures) not to exceed____in height and ______in footcandles. The cutoff angle of the light shall be______. Glare and light trespass shall be prohibited. No uplight shall be produced. The light fixtures in the parking areas shall be located in islands. The Zoning Code requires a landscaping plan with planting schedule. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan that includes: A. B. 30 new shade trees (2 and 1/2" caliper) to be planted along Old Crystal Bay Road, both vehicular entrances, and at the east end of the event lot. These shade trees are to be spaced 40 ’ -50’ apart. 12 Spring Snow Crabapple trees and 105 evergreen shrubs to be planted at the two entrances. Page 5 of 11 I ^ '*• s [ ' > ) c.new shade trees (2 and 1/2" caliper) to be planted along the west drop off from the southern cross walk to the northern building entrance, in the large parking island, along the western edge of the parking lot and drive and along the northern drop off walk. D.Shade, ornamental and evergreen trees shall be planted in groupings around the new pond, wetland, and along the walk around the school. E.trees to be planted in the parking islands. F.The Landscape Master Plan with a planting schedule may be phased over several years. The plant palette shall include trees with good fall color and winter interest. The plant schedule shall include overstory trees with fall color and understory trees with seasonal interest. The plan shall also clarify the areas to be seeded or sodded and clarify wetland plantings and/or restoration. PLANS REQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL: 8.A pedestrian crossing shall be provided at the south access. Signing, striping and a lighting plan for the crossing shall be submitted prior to building permit approval. The plan shall note the methods that will be used to discourage pedestrian crossing at the north access. 9.Based on increased pedestrian crossings from the proposed improvements, a flashing warning light system or traffic signal shall be provided at the south access pedestrian crossing. The type of system to be installed will be dependent on conformance with the warrants for school pedestrian crossings listed in the latest edition of the manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The applicant shall be responsible for completing a traffic signal warrant study in conformance with the standards listed in the latest edition of the manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to determine if the installation of a traffic signal is warranted at the pedestrian crossing. The warrant study shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Page 6 of 11 tj 10. 11. If a signal is warranted, the applicant shall be responsible for the full cost for the design and installation of the signal. The design and installation of the traffic signal shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. If the warrants for a traffic signal are not met, the applicant shall be responsible for the full cost for the design and installation of a flashing yellow light warning system at the crosswalk. This system shall have provisions for both pedestrian activation and a scheduled time of day activation. The design and installation of the traffic signal shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. A certificate of occupancy will not be issued for any of the planned improvements until a City approved traffic warning system is installed. If the signal warrants are not met at this time, the City reserves the right to complete future warrant analysis if traffic or pedestrian crossing conditions change. The applicant shall be responsible for notifying the City of any changes in pedestrian crossing conditions. If any future warrant studies show that signal warrants are met, the applicant shall be responsible for the full cost of designing and installing a traffic signal subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. In the event that the applicant does not install a future warranted signal within a reasonable time period after completion of the warrant analysis, the City reserves the right to complete the signal installation and assess the applicant for the cost of the improvements. Upon City Engineer approval of the installation of either a flashing light or traffic signal system at the pedestrian crossing, the City will own and operate the system. Applicant shall provide geotechnical recommendations and pavement design prior to building permit approval. Applicant shall provide the sanitary sewer plan to be approved by the City Engineer. All sanitary and storm sewer manholes and catch basins shall have an exterior sealing sleeve. The sanitary sewer shall have 18 inches of clearance below the water main at all sanitary sewer/water main crossings. Page 7 of 11 . 1 • ' 12.Applicant shall provide detailed installation information regarding the water main crossing to be approved by the City Engineer. All 12-inch valves shall be butterfly valves and detail included in the plan set. All hydrants shall be SO’ from the exterior walls of the building. 13.Applicant shall provide a plan indicating catch basins at all four access locations. All storm sewer shall be reinforced concrete pipe. The minimum pipe size for the storm sewer structure with more than 2 leads is 15 inches. Rip rap shall be provided at all storm sewer inlets and outlets. All flared ends shall have trash guards. 14. Applicant shall provide a drainage area map with storm sewer and ponding calculations. 15. Applicant shall provide outlet structure details. 16. Lighting plan, including cut sheets of the lighting poles and fixtures indicating their color, appearance, height, footcandles, and cutoff angle. LEGAL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMPf-APPROVAL: 17. A 20 ’ utility easement shall be provided for future water main extension to the east, centered on a line 30’ south of the south edge of the soccer field to the east lot line to the 12 ’ water main. 18. Signed and executed drainage easements shall be provided across all ponding areas and drainage ways. 19. Signed and executed flowage and conservation easements shall be provided across all designated wetlands. 20. Signed and executed permanent and temporary easements shall be provided for the Hennepin Park trail to be constructed in the summer of 1999. 21 . Proof of lot combination of the separate tax parcels. 22. Signed and executed developer’s agreement. Page 8 of 11 23. Letter of credit for 150% of the cost of site improvements as determined by the City Engineer. 24. The City shall provide a certified resolution, Resolution # easements over Outlot A. to vacate PERMITS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION: 25. Applicant shall submit plans to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and receive appropriate permits for grading and filling in and around the wetlands and drainage areas. 26. Applicant shall obtain a land alteration permit to move 14,000 cubic yards of fill. ACTIONS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION: 27. Erosion control shall be placed to protect the wetlands prior to construction. 28. Trees or woods to remain shall be protected and preserved. The root zones are to be fenced. Any damage to trees to be moved or preserved is to be treated in an appropriate and timely maimer by a trained arborist. FEES TO BE PAID PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL: 29. Application fee for land alteration permit. 30. Sewer and water connection charges; $8,900 per unit. 31. Sewer Availability Charges; $1,050 per unit. TERMS: j2. Authorities granted by this resolution are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (April 12, 2000). Page 9 of 11 1 .4 33. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 34. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregol.tg instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of April, 1999, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 10 of 11 . • • • STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) On this day of ^ 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared __________________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA COUi-TTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) On this day of ^ 199_before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared __________________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 11 of 11 . > #2471 Staff Report to Planning Commission March 15,1999 Conditional Use Permit for a New Middle School & Land Alteration Orono Middle School 800 Old Crystal Bay Road . * TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator RE:#2471 Orono Independent School District #278 800 Old Crystal Bay Road (to be assigned) Conditional Use Permit-Public Hearing EXHIBITS: A B C D E F G H I A Application Architect's letter Legal Description Plat map Property Owner's list Zoning map Comprehensive Plan maps Stormwater permit application Reduced plan sets Planning Commission receiving blueprints 4 Zoning:RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Comprehensive Plan:InstitutionalAJrban Service Area j Application: i The Orono Independent School District #278 is proposing to construct a new middle school and a new site circulation plan for the Orono High School. The middle school will serve 675 students in grades 6-8. The school building will include a varsity gymnasium, cafeteria, lecture room and media center. The school building will be approximately 113,000 gross square feet and two stories in height. This application will also require the following actions: 1. City to vacate easements across Outlot A (See Exhibit D) 2. School district to legally combine the separate tax parcels 3. Land alteration permit to grade the site/MCWD permits 4. Assign an address to the new middle school (800 Old Crystal Bay Road North) U247I Orono Middle School Conditional Use Permit March 15. 1999 pagt-l * . PARCEL INFORMATION Property Identification Numbers: (Middle School) 38 28-118-23-43 0006 38 28-118-23-43 0007 3828-118-23-43 0008 38 28-118-23-42 0005 38 28-118-23-42 0006 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 and 2, Block 1; together with Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2; together with Outlot A; all in Orono School Expansion, according to the plat thereof of record in Hennepin County, Minnesota. ZONING Minimum 2U>ning Requirements Lot Area Lot Width Front'Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Street 2 acres, dry buildable 200' 1 50 ’ 1 50 ’30'50 ’ Lot Size:51.39 acres The proposed middle school site conforms to the minimum lot area, lot width and yard requirements for the RR-IB zoning district. The allowed height is 2 1/2 stories or 30 feet. The applicant has indicated that the height of the building varies from 32-42 feet above grade. The height limitations may be increased by conditional use permit when applied to parapet walls (less than 3 feet above the height of the building), cooling towers, and elevator penthouses. Zoning Requirements for Schools The RR-IB district is intended to provide an area for low density residential development and limited agricultural uses. Schools are allowed in this district as a conditional use. The athletic fields are accessory to the principal school use. The Zoning Code requires that no building be located within 50' of any lot line and that open play areas be fenced with the fence to be located 15' fix>m any property line. H247t Orono Middle School Conditional Use Permit March 15.1999 pagt~2 A Signage The sign requirements for conditional uses in the RR-IB district limits signs to 1 nameplate sign with 12 sq. ft. of surface area. The sign may be illuminated with flood lights and either diffused or direct. The sign height is required to be lower than 8' in height and at least 5' from the property line. Signage for traffic control or parking restrictions are not considered nameplate signage. At the time the school district determines their signage needs, a variance from the sign requirements may be necessary to allow adequate signage for the middle school. Parking The Zoning Code requires schools to provide 1 parking space for every 7 students and 1 additional space for every 3 classrooms. The school building is designed for 67.5 students. Classrooms are in 6 clusters with 4 rooms in each cluster. The plan indicates approximately 30 classrooms with additional larger rooms for band, vocal, art, special education, a technology lab, and media room. A lecture hall and gymnasium are also included in the plan. The Zoning Code requires 96 parking spaces based on the number of stuci^cuv: fhe additional required parking may be calculated at 1 for each of the classrooms. Under this scenario, 96 + 30 parking spaces for a total of 126 parking spaces are required. This method of calculation does not include the gym, lecture hall or larger special instruction rooms. The National Parking Consultants Council (NPCC) recommends that elementary and secondary schools provide 1 paridng space for each classroom and other rooms used by students or faculty and an additional 1/4 parking space for every student over the driving age. Using the NPCC standards the middle school would require approximately 68 spaces as no middle school student is able to drive. The school district is proposing to provide 121 parking spaces in the front of the building with 5 handicapped parking spaces for a total of 126 spaces. This meets the parking requirement based on the Zoning Code if the larger rooms are not counted and no additional parking is required for the assembly and gymnasium area. The proposed plan includes a bus parking area for 25 buses that can provide 100 additional parking spaces for other activities when buses are not using the lot. The parking as proposed by the applicant is adequate for a middle school. The Zoning Code requires that each parking space be dimensioned at 9' x 20' with handicapped spaces typically larger. The parking surface is to be paved with curbing. ^2471 Orono Middle School Conditional Use Permit March 15. 1999 page-} s . Loading Berths The Zoning Code requires schools to provide 1 loading berth 25 ft. in length for each building with 1,000 - 10,000 sq. ft. For buildings over 10,000 sq. ft. an additional loading berth 50 ft. in length is required. The requirement for the middle school is a 25 ft. loading berth and a 50 ft. loading berth. The proposed middle school plan appears to meet the intent of the Zoning Code ordinance. A service area at the rear of the bus loading area provides a 16' wide paved lane to the boiler room and cafeteria area. This area will be adequate to allow trucks serving the cafeteria to maneuver in and out of the campus without interfering with the faculty parking area. Deliveries to the school should not generally occur when the bus parking area is in use. Smaller delivery vehicles will use the drop off area in front of the school building. Lighting The Zoning Code requires that parking areas are prohibited from having a direct source of light visible from the right-of-way or adjacent land. The school district has provided a lighting plan for the parking area that indicates the location of light poles 35* in height with .5 and 1. footcandle line measurements. The lighting plan is under review by the City's landscape architect. The athletic fields shall not be illuminated. At the City Council's work session, the Council suggested that the lighting standards be similar to the 12' light standards in the City Hall parking lot. Landscaping The Zoning Code requires conditional use permit applications to provide a landscaping plan with planting schedule. A landscaping plan has been provided and is under review by the City's consultant landscape architect. His comments will be provided at the Planning Commission meeting, or earlier. TOPOGRAPHY There are numerous small wetlands on the site. The highest elevation is near the southwest comer of the site near Old Crystal Bay Road North. The lowest elevations on the site are in the wetlands. The elevations change from 1,034' near the southwest comer to 1,000' in the wetlands. The site will be graded to provide a building pad for the two story building. The street side of the building will allow students to enter from the parking lot to the upper level. The upper level floor elevation will be 1036' and the lower level floor elevation will be 1023'. The area for soccer, football and baseball fields will be graded. Several wetlands on the site will remain. The required wetland it247l Orono Middle School Conditional Use Permit March IS. 1999 page-4 . .* setback is 26'. The school district has applied to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) for the appropriate permits for grading/filling and stormwater management. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The applicant will be changing the grade of the site to provide a building site for the 72,976 sq. ft. footprint of the middle school. Grading will also be necessary to provide the softball, football, and soccer fields behind the middle school. A NURP pond is proposed at the north side of the bus parking area. This plan is being reviewed by the City Engineer and will also be reviewed by the MCWD. The MCViD is expected to review this plan at their March 25th meeting. According to the school district's application to the MCWD, .902 acres of wetland will be filled with 14,000 cubic yards. The conditional use permit includes this amount of filling for land alteration. A land alteration permit will also be required. SEWER AND WATER The school district has submitted a plan for connecting to the City's water tower. The details of the utility plan is located on page Cl.5 of the plan sheets. The City Engineer is reviewing the plan. Staff will provide his memo at the Planning Commission meeting or earlier, if available. The sewer and water connection charge is estimated at 75 units for the school at $8,900 per unit. ACCESS The proposed access to the middle school is proposed to be provided by two driveway curb cuts on Old Crystal Bay Road North. The southerly curb cut is proposed to be 24' wide to serve the faculty parking area and drop-off lane. The northerly curb cut is 30' wide to accommodate buses and is directly across from the curb cut for the other school buildings on the west side of the road. Pedestrian traffic between the middle school and the rest of the school campus is anticipated. The proposed plan proposes sidewalk connections across Old Crystal Bay Road adjacent to the driveway curb cuts. The City Council discussed at a work session the need for pedestrian traffic controls. More detailed information about the student crossing areas and traffic control measures will be required. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS The Planning Commission may recommend approval of a conditional use permit if the application meets the following standards: 1^2471 Orono Middle School Conditional Use Permit March 15.1999 pagt-S 1 1.The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and the Comprehensive Municipal Plan; 2.That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, s^ety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements or improvements in the vicinity; and 3.That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The application meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and conforms to the minimum zoning requirements for a school in the RR-IB district. The applicant may need to make plan modifications per any comments received from the landscape architect and the City Engineer as reviewed and recommended by the PlanniijCommission. More detailed information regarding signage may be required at a later date when the school district determines their signage needs. The Planning Commission should discuss the following issues: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Height of the lighting standards for the parking lot; Fencing or screening for the play fields and prohibition of lighting the fields; Height of the building at 32'-42' Parking and circulation plan with traffic control measures for pedestrians Landscape architect's conunents City engineer's comments §247! Orono Middle School Conditional Use Permit March 15. 1999 page-^ I: In 'i 1 }■ 1 • • A Application # ! Date Received e? y-?- g Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION “TO Be "<30O OCO ' Site Address (POST OFFICE) 685 OLD CRYSTAl RAY ROAn______________________ Type of Application to be Filed CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT___________________— , Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 3*^ ^ Phone (liome) Phone (work) OfA APPLICANT Name INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #278 ________ Address 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NO. City LONG LAKE.Zip 55356-0046_ K.U. BUX ^6 OWNER (if different than applicant) ^ Name AjU:ffI 6t3^ft4/^A ftione (woik) _ Address ^/OtT ST' m^STRSBr City ST' pAVL^UfJ __Zip (month/year)Date Property Acquired____________________________________ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _____$ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____$175.00 Residential Accessory Use X $250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _____$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use _____$250.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading md filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) _____Afler-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation $200.00 Easement Vacation $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ______$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ______$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule \ fc‘vr • • 1 ’ *IPIIM S 3L' I ^J9 ziro « p'Februaiy 17, 1999 Michael P. Gaffron Senior Planning Coordinator 2750 Kelly Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 Re: Independent School District #278 New Orono Middle School Commission No. 98111 305 St . Peter Streei St . Paul . MN 55102 651.227.7773 FAX 651.223.5646 715-H ■n)UA.ATt Rtvu) E lcis ,IL 60123 847.608.2600 FAX 847.608.26'4 NLT: HTFr//\x vk')i'.\xoinAr..«:i)M Orono High School Site Circulation Improvements Commission No. 99016 Dear Mr. Gaffron: Independent School District #278 is pleased to submit the attached Conditional Use Permit application for the new Orono Middle School and new site circulation at Orono High School. The new 6-8 middle school features educational space for 675 students plus varsit)' gym, cafeteria, lecture room and media center. These spaces total 115,100 gross square feet in accordance with the referendum. The middle school vehicular access drives corresponds to the intersections serx ing the high school. ^ The improved high school site circulation paving improves pedestrian safety including a pedestrian crossing at the high point of old Ciy stal Bay Road (flashing lights have been discus.sed), increases parking for staff and students, and eliminates traffic conflicts between students and bus trafllc by using a bus corral of 25 buses. Vehicular access to the high school from Old Crystal Bay Road is in the same general location as currently exists, but with perpendicular intersection. The attached documentation supports the conditional use application as well as items referenced in section 10.09, Subd.. 3 of the Orono zoning ordinance: 1. The middle school is 115,000 gross square feet and two stor' ;. 2. The building height varies: two stories plus parapet totalling 30 feet above grade on rear side of building; and two stories plus enclosed mechanical penthouse on front side of building totaling 45 feet. These numbers are in accordance with sections 10.21 and section I0.75M of the zoning ordinance. It should be noted that the front side of building is partially below grade (and the grade varies) reducing the height above grade to approximately 32-42 feet. X - E^uat Emyleyer .A K < II I I I c IS Micheal P. GafTron Page Two 3. Schematic building elevations will be provided under separate cover prior to March 10,1999. Respectfully submitted. WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS George Gorbatenko, Jr., ALA Enclosures: Schedule Of Drawings (City C.U.P. Submission Packet) Sheet C1.0 Boundary Survey and Topographic Survey-Junior High School Site Sheet C1.1 Partial Topographic Survey-Ice Arena/High School Site Sheet C1.2 Site Removals Plan Sheet Cl.3 Middle School-Site Geometric Plan Sheet C1.4 Middle School-Paving, Signage and Striping Plan Sheet C1.5 Middle School-Grading and Utilities Plan Sheet Cl .6 High School-Geometric, Paving, Signage and Striping Plan Sheet C1.7 High School-Grading and Utilities Plan Sheet C1.8 Middle School and High School-Landscaping Plan Sheet C1.9 Construction Details Sheet CLIO Construction Detai Is Architectural Upper Level Plan Architectural Lower Level Plan Site Lighting Legal Description (See sheet Cl 0) Certified Property Owners List cc:lay Pomeroy, AJA Pat Arug, Arug Environmental Kevin Sullivan Scott McQueen Susanna Strand jnV990l6.'fcb9V 4 1 V. • •. • Ql ----- 02/11/1999 22:11 5440531 AJA ASSOC., INC.PAGE 02 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C toQctherwith Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2* tooether with Outiof a* PARCEL AREA: 2,238,631 square feat or 51.3919 acres. LUti-rt -J 1 V .» .1 '•> • c \ •i J 1 iS-a.3-(|() I f«’ U;^ IS tUMM ODYE • ~ • •* .^^|'^-a3- ^ A'-S'. Cshfi/o Ccl ~Sm.no’s mm « • •*s* • •*••• »•••#•% • ••«««• •••«• .wtnu Kl^tt («H m w * ^f (TO 1 IQ) 1 • p ut|a \ J tmi Mun 8 P^AfejS €-"Sr? ns % .a ( <81 C (0 \,VS : J------ < 1*8^ « ft*! **x — mm :-ti^ tiu" - a3- \ r*.,j - r**r*s»s»fts»»» ^••••••••••••«'••••••«•••••• s««»ss*s*«*ss ^••sa«ss*««»ta vsaaasBss**** • ••••ssa«»*«s• ••••ssc*ss«« aaassssassaas l••aassa«sss•s• • •ssassrsBss )• asssaassass • •aasaasaaaaa ' aaaasaaaaaaa* aaasaaaaaasS* I • •aaaasaSas a^a m aasaaaaBs a^ « CV.-a\*aW.*^V>aa*sasaaaBB#« aaaassaaaaS** l•a•ssa•aa•••a a*<a«a«a*aa«* »*aaaaaa«#a*»« aaa#aasas*««a > • aaaaaaaaac*«a« »aaassaaa*a«** mmm a a • • a a •«a*%»aa« a a a • • a a aaaaaaaa a a a a a a aassaaaa* a • a a a a a aasaaaaa a a a a a a a aaaassa* S a a a a a a SSaaaaaa a a a a a a a ■ a a a a a a • a a a a a a a Ssaaaaa* .•.•a*a-.*.*a-a a a a a a a a aaaasaaa a a a a a a a aaaaaaaa .•.*a*a’a a . | .WWWi a a a a a a a1 aaaaaaaa s a a a « a a a*s‘•*a*a*a* a a a a a s a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a • a a a a • s a a a a a a • a a a a I as • s s a • aa a^ a I S a a a a a a s s a ■ a a a a • a a a a a a a • a a a a a a a • a a a a a ;•:■:•;■:■:• V’’:a a a a a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa • a a a a a •.WWW '.•r.\W\a a 8 ji s a a s s r a • a • a a s 8 a a a 8 a a a a a • a a • a a a < a a a a a a < a a a 8 S a a a a a a a a a a a a*a*a*a*a _f*-* a*a*a*a*« aaa8a«S8 a^ir a a a aaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaa » aaaaaaaaaaaas a aaaaaaaaataa ■ aaaaasaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa«a ■ aaaaasaaaaaaa aaaaasaaaaaaa iaaaaa%%aaaa*a a taassaasasa* • •aa**aaaa8#aa aaaaasaaaaaaa • aaaaasaaaaaaa • assaaaaaaaaa ■ aaaaasaaaaaaa aaaaasaaaaaaa - » ••saaaaaasa • ■ a a a la S*S* a*a*8^ *a* *a* • • • • aaaaaaaa aaa• ■•••aa laaaa aaaaaaa«aaasaaaaaa lassa ssaawsaaaas 8 a a a a a a a s a a a a a a s a a • saaaaaaa«aa sssaaaa laaaa asasasaasa* aSaaaaa ,aaa% saaasaaaaaa aaaaaaa aaaa.I saasaa* aasa asasaa *J aaaa aaaaaaaSaaa •.•.'.•.■.•.'.I*.*.*.' aaasasa r^sss saaaaaa s * a a a a a a a a « a a a a a • a a a a a a a a a s • saaaaaa saaaaaa aaaaaaa a a s a a a a a a s a a a a a « a a a a a a a a a • a • r ( a a a a a a a a a a • a s a s a a a a 8 a a a s s s a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a s a .W'.W ■::«x aaaa aaaa a a s a a 8 a as a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a s a a a a a a a s 8 a a a a 8 a a a a a a a a a a a • a a a a 8 a a a a a asaa«aaaS%«asaa.asa • aaaa»aa • aasaasa T.T • ^ "SriLETf’^*^ y-----------------------------a»y a rssi------' I / r 9 ]| _____raa *’a_9EJZCL. .vs i ^ 1 1 — :i ti*»i }3-iiS-a3-</T) ..........................arran. .f»a.,.,r.. I I ^~8»»^l ' W ---- ’■'Wt.m ot* I I —V—* .‘oia > / • ;» I . , 7 anu I Km ca SZSTfJ .-rJ M IL UJo <a. «/i > io ^ lija.s UJ & V V VCVJ O' in u h-< IIICM a. oe iH o >K) Ul U. CM -I O I ^ f-4 O' K>cn m m H H M O . I K1 10 U U OS < < KCM ac Qc A•o > 10 < iH X Sill! O' 10 <0 HI m o o I Ik y» . lO 5 O A H S > > in J5«sEEr^ m e u u ^ X o < os K < Ullili M ^ /f T/ 8 ^ A H SSo u lO l-l < H lO < CM N I >A < ^ X(H inm inm «*UJ A H 90to in A rv A CM •O O M M X «J < < S P O O _ Z A OO A CL UJ O ■ A A A UJ > N< mAIS > <v-4 A A A A HI I O <Sci H I “B* % A A U Ul O ^ W____ A UJ A A A e O AAA A O Ul AgA •d i/i UJ Ul f-4e A CM S A CM CM ?s I- lu > A M < UJ A < iH I A A S’--* A AA CM A A A _ UJ OSsoA "> K O UJ A A Z Q|i5? A < Ul A |H A £ O S X < A S < Z A O H i .j-i e o o H. £ U h- < A O H* % UJ Ul g ! A p l.l9*S? A S A O K UJ A £ X < s DO 10 H • Ul JO a. H K£ UJ DC S UJ Ul12 S U (/) K> X M X CM ^ X U I X UJ M CO M X M (/) n UJ r4 I X X «CM e cf UJ coa*2lO e o o Ml lA K» lA lA UJ 5 e e X0 UJ iH > to < to X CM K 1 X « M iH CA M M ImCM ? « CM •A e X X < < u. u. UJ UJ h- H < < o o UJ UJ X X o o K h- (A (A K) X lA O lA ii e fH lA Xu < A UJ XX r ao < X a a X UJ < < > V X < Ul X UJ X X o X X < o X M X o X U0 lU < CM > ^ < U -J K) X •• X CM H X 1 X ^ < A M ^ U A lA K» lA X lA UJ 5i X •H A O H XrH X X X X1 X M < •I A < A A X CM O U <o o X e (0XA X 5 e XoA CM X A o-J A e H H CM X iAe e e M ssM CA CA CA CA UJ O X ^ X V i^i lAo o 0 •H iH lA CM 1 A QUJ XoM (A A AAUJ Xoa < A•^s Ia s UJuM X Xo o Xo < < CO IM N A < < X •J «i X X X M X iHo o o e tA A OXXXo o u X CM H A A A X h- :?i O A O «J A X^ r < A A A A A A X CM X X X X X CM X X M o X CO M 1 o o < > £•o IM X S £ X X A O X U <A O < X X M M M < X X X < X < X X > <•4 < X X X X XXXX X » U H <1 < -> < < X X A A A X A X X CM A U <CM A X A 1-4 X A X O O AX A COA X e M o O X O CO P A X A O AO X A O A o 5 O CM o A X A O H H CM X A O X X X X ZCX^INCr s WOLS^’EL lAt s .r MEDINA si<a: *“ avenue ----- ■ ■ ^1! “^p*> 3 3S Cr north Sf** LLi ? jJpNG LAKE I ^ X ^ r- to z z zUJ UJ UJo o o »/> lO to LU UJ UJoc cc oc s s s g 5 5 S I-. »-• CL <7 V,^ □ II □ ■ H11 0 ■-; 5 1 ^'*'' J r \ ^-n irnJ/\wW^l ■ v-'^ L: s«*^7-A jmr...i • r:^ / \ / Ji’\ V / \ •- "mm- w 5 ' -I lI'X-X & < > cr-^ cr/liO Iwl/uJUi fl>J^£r/) » • Ul UJo o i/ (s , C> ' -- H :■ j. .J' M j i .;..'H,4,-‘i * 0 t ^*Z*' : ^ ^ •. ^, K V l\^f i/>(l)'K »4i® 1 I 0 <J> f 9 i:\~ .. • (.•. isip^ 1 6|m / /#!®2Xv' 'V. r j 116:^ MhP»-0 1-1999 12:47 Gray Frcstnvatcr Center H;vys. 15 & Id, Navarre Mail: 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior. MN 55331-9578 Phone: (612) 471-0590 Fax: (612) 471-0682 Em 'I: admins^minnehahacrcck.oru Web Site: w\sVir.minnch3hacrccK.offl Board of Managors; John E. Thccios Prpsioent C. 'iVoodrow Love Vico Pfosident Pamela G. Blixt Treasurer Monica Gross SecreU7 Thomas W. LoBouniy Thomas Maple. Jr. Malcolm Reid District Office: Diane P. Lynch D'Slric! Adminisirata.' HIIIHEH hH h creek U hTERSHED 6124710ES2 P.0102 Minnehaha dreek Watershed District Improving Quality of Water, Quality of Life Date: 3/; To: C>z- From: Jim Hafiier, District Technician We have received the lUtachcd permit nppllcaiioii for a project within your city, Tliis application i.s tentatively scheduled for a MCWD Board of Managers meeting on 3/2^ ^ . If you have any concerns, comments or objections regarding this project please contact Jim Hafner. Distnci Technician, at 471-8226 within five days of receipt tiiis notice. You may also FAX comments to 471-0682 or send a message via E-mail to; jhafncr(ijr;nijnnchahacreck.org Thank you for your cooperation. MAR-01-1999 12:47 MltlMEHAHA CPEB: MATEPSHED 6124710632 P.-02-02,’ J • COMBINED JOLNT NOTIFICATION FORM • WATER RESOURCE APPLICATION . Use this fonn to notify/apply to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), their engineering consultants,- hr • DNR, and the Hennepin Conservation District of a proposed wutcr/wetland project or work which may fall within hcil -H * ^ -. - . .1 . . • ________j_____1 n nfn tViip ic.—^jurisdiction. These agencies should advise you of their jurisdiction or permit requirements v.itbin 10 day.s. Fill out this form completely and mail a copy, with plan, maps, etc... to the MCWD, Cray Fre.shwatcr Ceuwt, Navane, 2500 Shadywood Road. Suite 37. Excelsior, MN 55331. Keep a copy for your records. YOU MUST OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED authorizations BEFORE BEGINNING WORK.__________________ X ‘ 1. /^plicaut’s Name (Last, First, M.I.) Lew.son, Neal. Assistant Superinteudent ISD #27S, Orouo Phone No (612) 449.3300 f ^9 2 6 "lb99 Addrejw (Street. RhD. Box #, City. Stale. Zip) 6S5 Old Crystal Bay Road No.. F.O. Box 46, Long lake, MN 55356-0046 »«* > .* * ? •*'. •*I IL^V. — • 7 Location of proposed project (Attach drawing w/directions 10 sitc):US 12 10 CMd Crystal Bay Rd; north of Suidcct Center, cast COUNTY QTR SECTION(s> SECTlON(s) TOWNSHlP(s) RANGE(s) Lot. Block. Subdivision Henneniu SW'/a 28 118 N 23 W 1&2. 1&2. Orouo School Expansion PROJECT .ADDRESS: Old Crystal Bay Road CITY: OROXO, Minnesota--------- 3. LENGTH OF SHORE AFFEClED (in feet): VOLUME OF FILL OR EXCAVATION (Cubic yards): 14,00'J O'! AREA FILLED OR EXCAVATED 1$ 0.902 Acres. OR 39.284 Square Feet. 4. TYPE OF PERMIT BEING APPLIED FOR: ((2hcck all that apply): m STORMWAI ER VLVNAGEMF.NT D PLAN FLOODPLAIN ALTER.ATION B WETI^AND ALTERATION n SHORELINE IMPROVEMENT J STORM SEWER OUTFALLS 0 EXCAVATION (DREDGING) a G RIPRAP ^ ''WILDLIFE b. 0 SANDBI.ANKET 4 ICE RIDGE REMOVAL b. □ c. □ RETAINING WALL BIOENGINEERING □ BRIDGE <fc CULVT.RT CROSSINGS OTHER (DESCRIBE) Fill in existing w rtlaud basins .aud Crealiuu of new wetIunJ by excavation (SHE GRADING PLAN) 4a. APPUCANT-S REPRESENTATIVE: (Ucensed ContractriTTEnginccr. etc...) Include name, address & phone noml^r Jay Pemeroy. AJA. Inc.. #200 Valley Stpiare Office Cemci, 7575 Cioldcn V.dley Rd.. Golden Valley. MN .*»I-7 (.44-)>3 ) Patricia .%lig. Arlig Environmeutal. luc . P.O. Bo.x 1842, Minnetouka, MN 55345 (612-974♦98^6) 5. PROJECT PURPOSE (v/hy is Ihis'^ojecl needed - what benefits will it provide?) Middle School needed for projected coxulluicui aud programs ot the TSD #278 6 AL rF.RNATIVES (de.scribe anv other sites or methods that could be used to achieve the putjiose of your avoiding or minimizing water/wetland impacts. Attach additional sheets, if needed. SEE AlTACHED DOCUMENTATION 7. DATES: Proposed start of activity; April 1999 (Identify -Tny completed work, on attached drAwip^l Proposed completion: Scptciubcx 2000 NOaVE S. N.AMES & ADDRESSES OF ADJf llNING PROPERTY OWNERS (Ust provided to WCHD) 9. PERMITS have BEEN RECEIVED (R) OR /APPLIED FOR (A) FROM; (uotifi^d JNFj DNR A . ............. r________ t.^ ».-.r,t„ f..r Ki*rvK<;i \fN PDl T.UDON CONTROL AGENCYCOUNTY SVV'CD A CITY ('coatr.ictor'owner to apply for NPOFS) MN POLLUDON I hereby notify tlie tecipicnls of Ou^ Urni of the project proposed herein .uid reque^, I be advised of my ^rmits or oLher Jone^^rUiis ^uuVoceedina with woi;k before all required autJiori.adons ;ue uhtmned nuiv be subjeUtoFodffal, Slate vid/nrl(-culailnuni5iru:ive. civil un'l'or criminal penalties MiiJSS.___ SiebutuVe of P^O!^ru|<osii>^ Project or A^eiit D'-‘v -------------------------------- TOThL P.C.d ......... ! « \ I i; !m N \i i'^• • • • j { ; / «! I »i g L s i b a ;i i *irii iifkh|j! Snifi I h't iliil 5:j lilii li L ,I 1 ii -/--/.-V------/ ; ; / /' ^0^ ^V#FV !■• *•••••••• J *(if wm^m H «•« ««tf I 9t% *••••••«••••* 1^ ^ ^ ^ I a I • • •i 1/ ;^1. •r ^ ***** y' \ ! ? i I I ;'i ? I «V I I / / /■...■••••. If i; -*•'■■' >/ / '••' tf'V: = i -Ifl f'la ♦.— i * «li 11 .ii _____________.1*......• 1^) M" r ■ ■ ■■i \ ' •\ 9 i I • •' I / /; ! ♦ ii \-^ * **.i! ^ V] U *•. ............. i9 \ \s** I »•■M: i. ’*-5-- I ...........**---k ■•••................!.-......................................................................... I ,..•'*...................Hif............... i jj /•■■’ i..-......■;;;;;;;.i!!'.:‘.:‘j. ♦ . / / ________I •* V-. —M*"7 ii i ■1' i ■% i M=T* Ko •-- • S’ i!i|| jll slsiS |j ;Ji*»inn !- :[ ji fili f {? |:nI :i= i;»i .{*)i Beil ii c*x iU\i |S^! 14 H fi!‘ I; : I i-; dn i::.A t-. ;si» PI * I {'i !/ /» »/ / 1.! "" 1 ... j / t / ; ! ♦’ / i *’*4 -. , *•'.. ..'*' * 7 f f h / / /••........ • !i/ /! ./ !/ /1/ rr-r-.. j • {"■ i { -i"// / / / /‘ ' S‘ \ ,- I'* * / ,*'* •* • * I '*•... f / .*' •* ; ; ! *. •1 \ " 1 ..•■ ' ' • 1 / .. V-• !1 li : I MM. < H-l ' • • MM i 3 V . ? xi.siS I llinu!iil • f ••'rV ■ • -f; s"'—^ ■ ■' ■ ■! ■ y-K.:* ■'■■;.i>tS:s,s iiH'. mM I. s: r>! 1, *. •- . /'' wmm > '■ _.v / ’'.f '*V:‘» y' fc^T,-iefe=?ij£•‘V.’ ■ - i?: :Vi' ,;. , .' , '-‘r , Jrt -t •✓•• «•' - . • ' , • »< ■ *•’ A* * * vM- *.vi »;• •*'. ' ;• i,,’*1kV/ l\V :U: / -1. —>• .Vv r*. S«f: V-, ’ 7^ «*; *• • t --AV9 ‘•'<^11. IVISA90 <I-"10- 1 ^ \ |4 / * o • *» f VljW »w << -a: 'mm.f- ’VJ 4- \4l C I « . tiU ■\* /< Vi i L' V: pPlr \V ^ N ' ’ N ^ cri u'5 N ’•'kji.jir ; ' ''A •'• *•■' xh<i!h‘ r-v •'’" '■ [u:' •. I'.'J '*,• /• '\ 5I»n vj-.. 7' fV • ■ .411 vV4 • A > %i ■'»V, \k y :.^,i3«...^'.6.<2--'Vi' ___________________________^ W *___L mm \ . t %f»1 ,. s *> IHi t! 11 . II 111 HI I i4Xo'T i < iluojponcJ_ 001 310^1 H ! I J I i \ ti! I if I H 3 «4 4 Ml1 i h .MM llllilis!!i iiili •: ^3 UJ O UJ •J Ih!I M LMif.....®! if ® D I • • q o» Miii m lii 0 q TiTOTT wmmuoMwtmmuji*! Tum1J-— C3 [Z at““Ui L_ d a d □ 21 d A Q 1 I s 3 d i\ 7^ \ " \ f \^ I* ^ f i ifa >1 a 1 S 3 21 3 ]rr-Kf I • • I L tff 9^tW9 5ajQV tmut > J I \ 7 ““^—T > k [nMi mm f y 'N-i— k---/ 1 W 8 \ '///'! ^I > i\ 4 1 <cJ‘ >-■■ f W \I ^ / ■ ■>^Z4e: A ««4C.M k i---------------------- V, ,1 I!. ’^1 '!^" 1 ( I '' *•*-/// / "s, If ^ y//» ^ /■/ "\'::Z:^:z^iA //[ ■ 7 /' ='r-^'sr^7 ij(i--7^"^^ 1 V ''n 1 / i ^//l?^.(/ fjczr>'*m^V iic---- N I 1 I I ^ J t 13- \ i/ '■^ »3 ' ^^ \ / m. m ■Mi ? ■ *TCij MiF;l % i \ I i .« f f i i /i //^ / A I I Baig.'!lr//JriLii!ti93P:|; IflsK T- i ^ ■=■3!! 1/ I*'-jyA »-J N \ • —L.\N k.M« \ $ » S!e M « / illlr • I! k 1 » 1 II i k 1 » 5« k 1 ( k 1 ll ’hi 1 » !.! •. k l.i » 1 il 1 k 1 r S! tl k ' ! • i r 1 i ! !'l r 1 !■: h ' J ;• 1 |i ii• t b b • b t k :*• 1 •h * k 1 • ■• ; • 1 k i • k k '* 1 »k >: h 1 1 i!• m' »\ f ;i« 1 « 1 1 b ii ii i t t 1 If t 1 1 1 ii ii IS 1 ii 1 1 «i*1»«i ••i i ii »i >i *i II fi » ^ SI f« » !5 » !•!«•i»•! »I j •i •! » •! A i 8 i 1 i 1 i i lii 1 ■i! ♦ 9 9 8 1 1 1 8 8 9 » • 9 8 1 Hi1 !i; I p • « lii!!i f • b 1 I • »* k I |i i 0 k 1 Is 1 i 1 IS j 1 1 11 1 !1 I!|i I i 1} ii IV \i i rj '.'s'*1.if.;l Jij V\1 !,! !i lii 'Al vi I 's7/!.«'I: 1iiiDjpon{)_L 00 (SI *-> o u <0 O O X3 u to -M a •o a V a 4) T3 G 0>o> (00. < *1“ O *1 *o ■------ 00 CN % o o XI u c/5 4-> c *0 a V a a;•oc 4 4-1 U I-4 4-1 r ■ r^ wJ rnwmi Q -d A—'1i] ■vJi___1 m Mi* lp#» ■11 i'iii* isg!’.f* m 1- - -44- -4^--( -oo ' k o Li.Rec’g.w. J£ o CD ■ ir rv <DO) (0a. vr^ #2471 COUNCIL MEETING APR 1 2 1999 CITY OF OROnO Orono Middle School & High School Exhibits A Memo from Wally Case, DSU A1 Landscaping Plan B Memo from Tom Kellogg, City Engineer B1 Circulation Plan for Buses C Memo from School’s Landscape Architect D Memo from DNR Area Hydrologist E Memo from School’s Landscape Architect to Wold Associates LIGrH-TlN^^ PLAN ’ . 03/l'5/99 08:56 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU. INC.@001/005 DATE: TO: FROM: R£: DAllLGREN SHARDLOW AND UBAN INCORrOHATIO CONSULTING PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH SUITE 210 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-339-3300 PHONE 612-337-5601 FAX 14 March 1999 Elizabeth Van Zomeren Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Fax 612-249-4616 Wallace L. Case, ASIA Landscape Architect/Planner Review of Conditional Use Permit Drawings Orono School District No. 278 685 Old Crystal Bay Road N. Application # 2471 Pax Nota lii. 'etpec** VIZ- Prom PhonaJfI ^ ~ In response to your request, we have visited the site, reviewed the Conditional Use Permit Submission Drawings for the proposed Orono Middle School site construction, and High School parking lot redevelopment and have the following comments. PARKING LOT ISSUES Both the High School and Middle School proposed parking lots Include large Islands that separate the parking from the drop-off drives. This arrangement will require controlling pedestrian circulation and limiting crossing points to minimize vehicular conflicts and to reduce turf maintenance in the island. The plans do not indicate if pedestrian traffic across the island will be restricted. The High School lot also needs to Identify handicap access across the island and the placement of accessible ramps. The Middle School west lot and drop-off drive and the High School event lot have fairly large areas with slopes around 5 percent. This should be reduced to under 4 percent where possible. O:\JOBS\1601\MIOSC399.MEWA399MIDSC.MEM 03/15/99 03:57 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU. INC.@002/003 The bus/event parking at tha High School and Middle School both propose large surfaced areas with no islands and very little surrounding landscaping. These large lots need landscaping to reduce their visual impact. 1 IQHTING The plan Indicates three types of KIM metal halide site lighting fixtures. Two styles of parking field lights (1000 W on 35 feet high poles) and one pedestrian light (175 W) The height of the pedestrian pole is not indicated. The City's Engineer should review the proposed lighting levels. The School District's Consultant should provide cut sheets of the poles and fixtures showing the color and appearance of the proposed lighting. Three of the larger lights are shown centered between the parking bays. As proposed; these lights would typically bo placed on exposed pier lootings. An alternative would be to place parking islands around the lights. This would reduce the parking by two spaces per light but is safer. WgTLANDS CREATION The wetland pond system that is being created to mitigate the necessary wetland filling may provide a unique opportunity. This system could be designed and graded with islands (for wildlife) and for trails to accommodate board walks and wetland access to facilitate creating an accessible wetland learning environment. The extent or phasing of any wetland plantings or restorative program should be clarified. ATHI FTIC FIELD ORIENTATION The orientation of the western softball field produces an afternoon/evening sun glare condition for the catcher and batter. The orientation of the eastern softball field results in a late afternoon/evening sun glare for the short stop and left fielder. The side by side orientation will also result in some foul balls being hit into the adjacent players benches and bleachers. Will players benches, bleachers or permanent goals (soccer/football) be installed? The preferred orientation for the long axis of the soccer fields is north south to avoid sun glare for shots on goal. The proposed field grading forms a ridge line across the fields from the northeast to the southwest. The long fairly flat (1 Vj percent) gradient may dry out slowly depending on the soil conditions. -2- 03/15/99 08:57 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU. INC.®003/005 I ANDSCAPINGi Miririle School Th0 Landscspe Plan for th© area around the new Middle School proposes planting thirty new (2 Va inch caliper) shade trees along Crystal Bay Road, at both vehicular entrances, and at the east end of the event lot. These shade trees are to be spaced 40 to 50 feet apart. The Landscape Plan also proposes planting twelve Spring Snow Crabapple trees and 105 evergreen shrubs at the two entrances. The Landscape Plan includes only six trees in the parking islands. It does not include trees along the west drop off walk, the large island between the parking lot and the school, along the west edge of the main parking area, along the north side of the event lot, along the walk around the school or around the new wetland and pond. The proposed Landscaping Concept is generally appropriate for the size and intensity of the facility. However, the addition of many more trees will be necessary to adequately landscape this large campus and to make it an aesthetically Inviting part of the community. We recommend that additional shade trees {2 Yz inch caliper) be planted (50 feet apart) along the west drop off walk from the southern cross walk to the northern building entrance, in the large parking island, along the entire western edge of the parking lot and drive, and along the northern drop off walk. We also recommend that additional shade, ornamental and evergreen trees be planted in groupings around the new pond and wetland, and along the walk around the school. High School The Landscape Plan proposes planting fourteen new (2 Vz inch caliper) shade trees and machine moving ten (6 to 8 inch) ash trees to locations between the new parking lots and the High School. Most of these shade trees are to be spaced 50 feet apart. Much of the existing landscaping In the boulevards and.around the school will remain in place. Considering the existing landscaping to remain, the proposed landscaping is generally adequate and appropriate for the size and type of facility with the following qualifications. The High School site removal plan indicates relocating approxirnately eighteen deciduous and evergreen trees 4 to 10 inches. The Middle School and High School Landscape Plan indicates machine transplanting ten 6 to 8 inch ash to the island between the new east lot and the school. The new locations of the other eight relocated trees needs to bo clarified. The removal plan also shows the removal of twelve 10 to 16 inch ash east of the existing High School Parking lot. Approximately eight of these larger trees may be In good enough condition to try moving them with a larger curved spade (108 inch if available). 1 -J- 03/15/99 08:57 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU. INC 0004/005. 2. The proposed Landscape Plan does not include any trees along the west side of the new front walk, the new islands east of the gymnasium, along the walk north of the new event parking lot or around the new drainage pond. Additional shade trees should be planted 50 feet apart along the west side of the new walk, In the pedestrian and parking islands, and along the north side of the event lot. Groupings of evergreen trees should also be planted in the area to the northwest and west of the event lot, and a few groups or clusters of overstory or understory trees should be located around the new drainage basin. plant Palette The proposed plant palette Is very utilitarian and practical. However, it does not Include trees with good fall color or good winter interest. We recommend expanding the plant schedule to include one or more overstory trees with fall color (IE. Red or Autumn Blaze Maple) and two additional understory trees with seasonal interest (IE. Ginnala Maple, Shadblow Serviceberry, Pagoda Dogwood). The Landscape Plan also needs to clarify the areas to be seeded or sodded. Phasing Large public facilities such as this should include the preparation and approval of a Landscape Master Plan that will be phased over several years. The contract documents could include additional plantings as an alternate to provide a means documenting the approved plantings and adjusting to the budget requirements. The planting of additional trees will improve both the aesthetics and function of the campus. We recommend that additional or phased additional plantings be required as a condition of approval. FROSION CONTROL The District must ensure that erosion control be provided, monitored and maintained wherever needed until the vegetative cover in the disturbed areas has been fully and finally restored. Erosion control may be needed along the woods to the northeast of the created wetland depending on the extent of the grading and disturbed area. Erosion control must be also placed to protect the required 26 feet wide buffer zone surrounding the wetlands designated to remain. The grading adjacent to wetlands 8 and 6 should be revised to avoid encroaching on this buffer zone. -4- 03/l'5/99 08:5$ FAX 612 337 5601 DSU, INC.®005/005 TRPF ANH wnnPLAND PROTECTION Trees or woods that are shown to remain must be protected and preserved. The root zones of these trees and woods are to be fenced and maintained as off limits to all construction activities. Any damage to trees to be moved or preserved is to be treated in an appropriate and timely manner by a trained arborist. If you hove questions regarding these comments, or if 1 can be of further assistance, please call me at 339-3300. DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW, AND UBAN, INC. Wallace L. Case, ASLA Landscape Architect/Planner 1 » > i -5- u in Co ao D HDs D Co <-• cdc E o 4-* *c *c5co c3 E O c I •oc cdu I oo oto D cd O c *5e 3 CO C C3 C *E 3 cd *o tc C €d >c cd O c tJ 0>u« ’•6 •oc cd >4-4 *55c 4-4c 4> > UD t3 O O 3•o Ou O 4-4u t£o> o s cd c o *55 o 4-4c 'Oc cd u•c ♦-*o cdo c cd ao E cd CO CO 0) Oo;c •3 3 Cd oou* 3 O CO cd O E CO CO O e O wo o E u O <2Eoo CO 0> Uc cd Occ cd Coo, D 3 cd C44. O c CO C Ou 4-4 c 3 bfc 4-4 •Si D. Eo 0 < 1 u. *Ec E 3 o u. O J} o p Cd 0) •O o .E 4-4 oc COo o•o *5c E 3 COc cd P O .> 4-4 Souo H-U *0 cd "Occd dju P 0 CO 4-» tl 33 0 • -4-*noa; Cd 4-» 4-4 to > • v-* E Cd Vm to 4-4 fi3 4-> bf JC 33 0/ a; JC 04->C 0 c .2 0 JC 0 0>u c"5 0 > 0 0> JC 4-4 9 Eoiz c 4> C g <2 *5ccd I «ccd CJ OV- 3 O t/j Eo •oc Dou- Cx ucd c 4)B Oi 4> C UCtHTlMi' INFO U ’« C Ea fc: 0 3 U 1o Information Sheet Number 122 (May 1997) International Dark-Sky Association 3545 N. Stewart. Tucson, AZ 85716-1241 USA SavcOurSky@aol.com http;//www.darksky.org Examples of Good and Bad Lighting Fixtures GOOD Even post-top ornamental fixtures, like this Salem Cutoff from GE Lighting, can be cutoff Vf'ith clear panels and iamp/reflector located above. GOOD Flat-lens cobra head fixtures, like this American Electric Series 125 Roadway Cutoff luminaire, provide excellent roadway lighting with greatly reduced glare and no uplight. M fm ir - . GOOD Many existing dusk-to-dawn security lights and residential streetlights can be retrofitted with the Hubbell Skycap. □ I I GOOD TheYorklown, another ornamental from Emery Fixtures, also has clear panels and bulb located above for maximum glare and spill light control. GOOD This new generation of flat-lens cobra head fixture from American Electric, called the DuraStar 2000, provides superior lighting uniformity at standard mounting heights and spacings. GOOD The Hubbell Skycap turns any standard NEMA head light into a full-cutoff light v/ith wide area coverage. r .> vv • o'; '‘'■T'l'-" ' ■ ■- ••• - ■ # . • r’ BAD Non-cutoff fixtures like this “acorn” ornamental cause light pollution. BAD The ubiquitous drop-lens cobra head luminaire produces a level of glare and uplight that Is both unacceptable and unnecessary. - BAD NEMA head style fixtures are very inefficient, sending about 20% of the light upward and another 20% horizontally outward, creating glare. GOOD Flat-lens shoebox fixtures come in many forms: square, rectangular, circular, etc. All control the light with internal reflectors. Glare and light trespass are minimized; no uplight is produced. GOOD Fill-cutoff wail packs such as this mcPhilben 101 Wail Sconce make excellent entryway and building perimeter lights, and there is enough forward throw that adequate lighting is provided for near-building parking. GOOD If floodlights must be used, they should always have top and side shielding, and be pointed at least 45° belov/ the horizontal. ti, GOOD Post-top flat- lens shoebox fixtures like this one provide good area illumination without light pollution. GOOD Recessed canister lights built into the eaves or canopy of a house, garage, or other building is the first choice for lighting building exteriors. ~ L JK GOOD Even sports lighting can be done well, if one uses cutoff tight fixtures such as these from Soft Lighting Systems. BAD (sometimes) The telltale sag lens gives this luminaire away as a possible problem. If the lens is clear and very shallow, and the bulb v/attage is not too high, this type of light can cover a wider area without too much glare or uplight, but beware! 1 »■ !l i m BAD V/all packs like this should never be used. They produce enormous glare and uplight. BAD Unshielded floodlights provide a trashy ‘ prison yard" look and should not be used. Information Sheet Number 122 (May 1997). p.2 s s-i H \'NTd -‘)Kuy^orwn Ml KJo X UJ , CL i< !!iS§L §OZZ< Szo<Zi S<(0-IQ. V / / »1 h 4 J \ L -■___ I I a aaiaa n 111 b b b 1Site s :; • :? • 5 ? ill U.ini] I 11 J - ills 5 It i IJ? I f y 8*1 p hh MilIII ! ! If iH IS! Is I if . H Ij I i ! ih 88 I h h\ pj > i * !k “ iI' I i Uiiiiiii 11.1 n i - H 1 N1^ Iy t\t ?s ta *6 i S 3 » 3 U4* 'XMtn* f ax'* *«a I « tun nmm mm m* I ^ ) inff A Mi€M N j\d^.dlr^4\uKi. - 'mtys, •t ,1 _r i, ..J irsnu:^s:f -Hi±H4 J J y /^ )l I zI T m =\ 5i I mmrn ilt CM«> ni -J (P /■ )■* y 1 \ <L.' J *nuvAtnti)/j y «i::;::::::::::s:;::::::n::::::;:s»m»:s:si i i i. ' H'^Hi I J • MU W ■ r f IS ! JCtM UQlt I I o‘ o »; 1 £li If 1 fjSH! J »• »ii'l Is l!“"i S M l*J ’’SJTStf 1 Os \ \\ \ ^ I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & |\ \ Associates Engineers & Architects March 15, 1999 Elizabeth VanZomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re: Orono Middle School File No. 139-2471 Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderhk ^nd AssocuUes. Inc is «»n AfftrmMtve Action £qu^l Opporti^niiy Employer Principals Otto G Bonestroo. PE • Joseph C AndeMik, PE • M.^rvin L SorvaM. PE • Richard E Turner PE • Glenn R Cook. PE • RoPert G Schunicht. PE • Jerry A Bourdon PE • Robert W Rosene. PE and Susan M Ebcrhn. C PA Senior Consultants Associate Principals Howard A Sanford Pf • Keith A Gordon. PE • Robert R Pfcfferle. PE Richard W Foster. PE • David O Loskota. PE • Robert C Russek. A IA • Mark A Hanson. Michael T Rautmann. PE • Ted K Field PF • Kenneth P Anderson. PE • Mark R Rolfs. PE • Sidney P Williarnson. PE . L S • Robert F Kotsmith • Agnes M Ring • Michael P Rau. PE • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE Offices St Paul. Rochester Wiiimar and St Cloud MN • Milwaukee. Wi W-'e^J/fe W WW bonestroo com rtPCi’iV'-O m ' 7 1999 Qi'fV Or OfiOiXO Dear Liz: We have reviewed the preliminary plans for the proposed Orono Middle School. The site is located east of Old Crystal Bay Road, south of County Road 6 and north of Orono City Hall in the southeast quarter of Section 28. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1. Access: The proposed access locations appear to be acceptable. A pedestrian crossing should be shown at the south access. This location is near the crest of the hill and provides for maximum sight distances. Signing, striping and lighting plans for this crossing should be submitted for review. Pedestrian crossings at the northerly access should be discouraged. Geotechnical recommendations and pavement design should be provided for our review. 2. Sanitary Sewer: The plans show the invert elevation of the existing MH 1 at 1013.3. The proposed upper and lower floor elevations for the school are 1036.33 and 1023.00 respectively. The sewer service from the school would flow into MH 2, which has a proposed invert of 1031.18. This design would allow for gravity service to only the upper floor of the school. The design would provide a 3.12-foot build for MH 2. The existing MH 1 invert is low enough to allow for gravity service to both floors and provide adequate cover at MH 2 so that insulation wouldn’t be necessary and freezing wouldn’t be a concern. It is unclear why the proposed design does not provide for gravity service to the entire building. The sanitary sewer schedule incorrectiv identifies MH 2 as MH 1. The sanitarv sewer schedule should be revised to agree with the plans. All sanitary and storm sewer manholes and catch basins shall have an exterior sealing sleeve as manufactured by Infi-Shield or an approved equal. The City standard solid casting for sanitary and storm manholes is 1642B, the plans incorrectly show the casting number as R-1733. A note should be included in the plans specifying that sanitary sewer have 18 inches of clearance below the water main at all sanitary sewer / water main crossings. The connection to the existing sanitary manhole shall be core drilled and a rubber boot installed. Insulation should be provided for all sanitary sewer with less than 6 feet of cover. 3. Water Main: Will the water main crossing Old Crystal Bay Road be jacked or open cut? The method of installation should be specified. If the roadway is open cut a street restoration detail and traffic control plan should be included in the plan set. All 12-inch valves should be butterfly valves and a detail included in the plan set. One of the hydrants on the east side of the building should be moved to eliminate an approximate 30-foot gap in coverage near the center of the building. All hydrants should be a minimum of 50 feet away from the exterior wall of the building. 4. Storm Sewer: We recommend that catch basins be provided at all four access locations. All storm sewer should be reinforced concrete pipe. We recommend that the minimum pipe size for a storm sewer 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651*636*4600 ■ Fax: 651*636*1311 stnicture with more than two leads be 15 inches. Based on this, the 12-inch pipe downstream from CB 7 should be 15 inches. Riprap should be provided at all storm sewer inlets and outlets. All flared end sections should have trash guards. A drainage area map along with storm sewer and ponding calculations should be submitted for review. Outlet structure details should be provided. The proposed pond on the west side of Old Crystal Bay Road is shown outletting to an existing wetland. The outlet for this wetland and impacts downstream should be reviewed. Plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) for their review. 5. Easements: The plan set submitted to us did not include a plat drawing. Final platting should include 66 feet of dedicated right-of-way for Old Crystal Bay Road if it doesn’t already. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along all exterior lot lines. Drainage easements should be provided across all ponding areas and drainage ways. A 20-foot wide utility easement should be provided for future water main extension to the east. The easement should be centered on a line located 30 feet south of the south edge of the proposed soccer fields, extending from the east lot line to the proposed 12-inch water main. Permanent and temporary easements should be provided for the Hennepin Parks trail that is scheduled to be constructed this summer. 6. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we will prepare an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. Please contact me at 651-604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono iiy .f March 16,1999 ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Landscape Architecture • Site Planning • Elizabeth Van Zomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RSCSIVED RE: Proposed New Orono Middle School Reconstmction of Orono High School Orono, Minnesota MAR 1 8 1999 Cl IV u.- OnOiVO Dear Liz: As a quick response to some of the issues raised by your consultants in their review of the School District’s CUP submission, we offer the following comments: BRA Associates letter dated March 15.1999 1.Access - Pedestrian crossings will be provided at the street crossings along Old Cr>'stal Bay Road at the north and south intersections of the two school entrances. Likewise, crosswalks will be painted at curb-cuts, pedestrian crossings, etc. at the proposed City trail, building entrances, and the like. 2.Sanitary Sewer - Proposed sanitary sewer for the middle school will be designed as a gravity feed to the existing manhole in Old Crystal Bay Road. Unfortunately, we incorrectly labeled the inverts of the sanitar>' pipe as it exits the building and enters the e.xisting sanitary sewer structure. The correct invert for the building service (BSl) should be 1018.0 (5* below finished floor elevation). The invert at MH2 will be 1017.85 with 6" PVC pipe sloping at 0.5% for the 555-foot run to the existing manhole (MHl). The new invert will be 1015.07. Sanitary manhole castings will be per City standard (1642B). 3.Water Main - The connection of the proposed 12-inch DIP to the existing stub under Old Crystal Bay Rd. will be by an open cut. The street will be restored per the City’s requirements for typical compaction, street pavement section, etc. Regarding hydrant spacing, we are waiting the Fire Marshall’s review, however, we appreciate Mr. Kellogg’s comments regarding the hydrant spacing at the front of the building. 4.Storm Sewer - We will specify that storm sewer pipe below all paved areas and above 15 inch diameter to be reinforced concrete pipe. Pipe in grassed areas and 12" diameter and smaller will be RCP or PVC (contractors option). Calculations and associated drainage sketches will be provided for the proposed stomi sewer system. VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER • SUITE 200 • 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427 PH (612) 544-7129 • FAX (612) 544-0531 City Submission - Orono Schools Response Letter - 3/16/99 Page 2 5. 6. Easements - The owner is aware of each of the requested and required easements for the project site. Each of the easements will be or have already been initiated. Financial Guarantee -1 am not sure of Mr. Kellogg's request for financial guarantee required for the project, howe’. er, being that the school is a publicly funded entity and that all contractors working on this project will be required to provide a 100% Performance and Labor and Materials Guarantee to ensure completion of the project, we do not feel that additional guarantees are necessary. DSU lnc*s letter dated March 14,1999 1. Parking Lot Issues - Refer to item number 1 above. Currently, the 5% gradient in the parking lots and drives meets ADA requirements. Of course, if these gradients can be decreased that would be our intent, however due to the character of the site this luxury may not be obtainable. 2. Lighting - This issue is currently under review. 3. 4. 5. 6. Wetlands Creation - Plans and specifications are currently being reviewed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and, at present, preliminary findings are generally positive. Athletic Field Orientation - Due to school’s anticipated coaching / supervision needs and to allow flexibility of the designed fields, the softball fields have been oriented as shown. Furthermore, the orientation of the soccer fields, although not preferred, allows for the largest length and width of the field (if fields were rotated north-south, the fields would fall below regulation size). At present benches, bleachers and permanent goals are not included in the project but may be installed in the future. Landscaping - Mr. Case’s comments and suggestions will be taken into account when developing the final landscape plan for each of the project sites. As previously indicated, the amount of landscaping shown on the plans was provided in order to meet anticipated City guidelines. With the final design of the campus landscape master plan, we will strive to link the two schools with a distinct theme and a varied palette of plant material. Tree relocation issues will be further defined as we come closer to bidding the project. Erosion Control - Erosion Control and Storm Water Management Plans have been submitted to MCWD for their review. City Submission - Orono Schools Response Letter - 3/16/99 Page 3 7.Tree and Woodland Protection - Existing trees will be protected with snow fence at the drip line. The Removals Plan and Grading Plan will also indicate limits of construction so as to eliminate any possible damage to existing woodland areas. Liz, at present, we have not received a draft copy of your comments. For that reason we have only addressed your consultant’s comments as noted above. Based on last night’s Plaiming Commission meeting, we hope many of your questions have been answered. We trust the above information addresses some of the additional issues at hand. If you have any other questions please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIA TES, INC. Jay R. Pomeroy, AS LA Cc: George Gorbatenko - Wold Architects Scott McQueen - Wold Architects File • « Minnesota Department of Natural Resources DNR Waters - 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106-6793 Telephone: (612) 772-7910 Fax: (612) 7"2-7977 MAR 1 8 1959 Oil V wnOiNIO March 17, 1999 Mr. Neal La\vson Assistant Superintendent ISD U27S, Orono 685 Old Crystal Bay Road No., P.O. Box 46 Long Lake, MN 55356 RE: Project Notification, Orono Middle School Construction, City of Orono, Hennepin County Dear Mr. Lawson: The Department of Natural Resources ^DNR) is in receipt of your project notification for the Orono Middle School project (SW'/i Section 28, TI18N-R23 W). Based on our review of the notification form, data and maps of the area, we have determined that there are no DNR public waters or public water wetlands on the site; therefore, the project does not require a DNR permit. If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or one million gallons per year, the contractor will need to obtain a DNR Appropriation Permit. You are advised that it typically takes 60 days to process the permit application, however, construction dewatering of 50 million gallons or less can be usually be authorized by DNR General Permit #97-0005 in approximately one week. This letter is only a notification on the need for a DNR permit for your proposed project. You should be aware that your project may be subject to federal and local wetland regulations, as noted on the ”Local-State-Fedcral Water Resource Project Notification/ Application Form". The Department may provide additional conunents on your project through our review of applications submitted under these other regulatory programs. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact me at (651) 772-7914. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist CCS/JS c:U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Joe Yanta City of Orono, Greg Gappa Hennepin Conservation District, Ali Durgunoglu Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Jim Hafher Conservation Officer Jim Konrad Bill Penning, Ecol. Services w/PNAF DNR Information: 651-296-6157 • 1-888-646-6367 • TTY: 651-296-5484 • 1-800-657-3929 Pnnled on Recycled Paper Containing a Minimum ol 10% Post-Consumer Waste An Equal Opp«inuniiy Emplover Who V alues Diversity • t March 24, 1999 ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, A INC. s Landscape Architecture • Site Planning • Civil Engineering Mr. George Gorbatenko Wold Associates, Inc. 305 St. Peter Street St. Paul, MN 55102 RECH]V:iD MAR 2 5 1999 RE:Proposed New Orono Middle School Reconstruction of Orono High School Orono. Minnesota CITY Or OaCA'O Dear George: /\s a response to condition item U2 stated in the City ofOrono's Notice of Planning Commission Action (dated March 16, 1999), we offer the following comments: We have reviewed Wallace C.ase’s letter dated, March 14, 1999. Our responses noted below correspond to Mr. Case's paragraphs. I.Parking l,ot Issues - Pedestrian traffic across islands will be directed over pavement. Also at these crossings, handicap ramps/acccss will be provided. Currently, the 5% gradient in the parking lots and drives meets ADA requirements. Ofeourse. if these gradients can be decreased that would be our intent, however due to the character of the site this luxury may not be obtainable. Landscaping will be provided around the High Scht>ol and Middle School bus/event parking areas as budget permits. I.ighting - This issue is currently under review by Wold Architects. 3.Wetlands Creation - Plans and specifications are currently being reviewed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and, at present, preliminary findings are generally positive. 4.Athletic Field Orientation - Due to school ’s anticipated coaching / supervision needs and to allow flexibility of the designed fields, the softball fields have been oriented as shown. Furthermore, the orientation of the soccer fields, although not preferred, allows for the largest length and width of the field (if fields were rotated north-south, the fields would fall below regulation size). At present benches, bleachers and perntanent goals are not included in the project but may be installed in the future. 5.Land.scaping - Mr. Case’s comments and suggestions will be taken into account when developing the final landscape plan for each of the project sites. As previously indicated, the amount of landscaping shown on the plans was provided in order to meet anticipated City guidelines. With the final design of the campus landscape master plan, we will strive to link the two schools with a distinct theme and a varied palette of plant material. Tree relocation issues will be further defined as we come closer to bidding the project. VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER • SUITE 200 • 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427 PH (612) 544-7129 • FAX (612) 544-0531 City Submission - Orono Schools Response Letter - 3/23/99 Page 2 Middle School - As budget allows, landscaping will be provided along the west drop-olT walk from the southern cross walk to the northern building entrance, in the large parking island, along the west edge of the parking lot and drive, and along the northern drop-off walk. High School - As budget allows, landscaping will be provided along the west side of the new walks, in pedestrian and parking islands, and along the north side of the event lot. Groupings of evergreens may be located in the area to the northwest and west of the event lot and around the NURP pond. 6.Plant Palette - Additional varieties of plants will be utilized in the final landscape plan including, but not limited to Red Maple, Scrviceberry, and Dogwood. 7.Phasing - The School District has every intention of developing the Middle School and High School sites as a campus. With this, landscaping will be viewed as an important and integral part of the renovation and construction projects. As previously stated, the final landscaping plan will reflect more and varied plant material than shown on the CUP submission drawings. We feel that to require additional or phased planting as a condition of the approval is unnecessary. 8.Frosion Control - Erosion Control and Storm Water Management Plans have been submitted to MCWD for their review. The required 26' wide buffer along Basins 6 and 8 has been shown because there is no proposed grading within the limits (only buffer landscaping to deter school maintenance staff from mowing these areas). 9.Tree and Woodland Protection - Existing trees will be protected with snow fence at the drip line. The Removals Plan and Grading Plan will also indicate limits of construction so as to eliminate any possible damage to existing woodland areas. We trust the above information addresses the issues at hand. If you have any other questions please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, ANDERSON-JOIINSONASSOCIA TES, INC. Cc: Liz Van Zomeren - City of Orono File U(b ffr it^(f flAN April 1,1999 Ms. Liz Van Zomeren Zoning Administrator City of Orono Ciystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 APR 0 5 1999 Oi 11 UriOA'O 305 St. PtTRR S i RTF. I St. Paul. MN 55102 651.227.7773 I AX 651.223.5646 715-H Tolu.ATT Road EUii.x:, IL 60123 84"^.608.2600 LAX 847.608.2654 NET; HTTP//« OLDAE.COM Re: Independent School District #278 New Orono Middle School Commission No. 98111 Re: Orono High School Media Center Addition Commission No. 99016 Subject: Conditional Use Permit Dear Liz: The purpose of this letter Is to address zoning/planning issues identified by the Orono Planning Commission March 15, 1999. 1 . Site lighting plan resolution: a. Attached please find 11x17 reduction of lighting plan submitted with C.U.P. (sketch ‘A’). The plan indicates nvelve foot poles along the pedestrian path on the public side of the building and thirty-five foot poles in large paved areas. b. For your use we have attached a sketch ‘B’ showing twelve foot poles in parking areas. Note that the staff/visitor parking lots would need a line of poles along the middle of the lot and even then portions of the lot would not be properly lighted. Also, twelve foot poles cannot be used in the bus loops because the poles would obstruct the bus traffic flow. This leaves the middle of the bus loop area unlighted. Since code requires lighting of all the parking lots, we do not recommend twelve foot poles in the bus areas, nor the visitor/staff parking area. c. We have attached catalog data that shows the approximate shape of the light fi.xtures and light distribution cur\es. Using the proposed lighting layout (sketch ‘A’), light is directed downward onto required areas and “cuts off” at the property edge so that motorists along Old Ciystal Bay Road do not experience glare. d. We recommend approval of the lighting plan (sketch ‘A’) submitted with the C.U.P. as it provides twelve foot poles scaled to fit the pedestrian path and uses thirty-five foot poles to light larger areas efficiently and without pole bases that obstruct traffic/snow removal procedures. 2. Landscape Architect (Cites Consultant) comment: a. See attached letter dated March 24, 199> from Andcrson-Johnson Associates. Since our C.U.P. submission we have been informed that Jim Haffner of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District recently gave a verbal approval of Anderson-Johnson's Wetland Submission. 3. Building Height a. As discussed earlier with you, the Orono Building Official approved the proposed building height because the building is less than 2 '/z stories. Equal Opportunity Employer Letter to Liz Van Zomeren Page Two 30S St. Pftfr Stref .t St. Pall . MN 55102 651.227.7773 FAX 651.223.5646 715-H Touc -.atf R oad F.udn , IL 60123 847.608.2600 FAX 847.008.2654 4. Pedestrian Crossing nlt : nTTr//\xvxvi.ixoLOAt.n)M a. The school district e.xpects a small number of high school students to use the pedestrian crossing after school hours. The district believes most students will drive their car from the high school lot to the middle school parking areas, especially the north lot near the gymnasium. Due to the low pedestrian traffic volume, they plan to install a student crossing signs similar to the one currently being used at the adjacent Student Center. 5. Variance for 40’ setback at parking lot a. As discussed earlier, your staff recommendation will be that City Council approve a variance for the 40’ parking setback at the April 12, 1999 City Council meeting. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS cc. Neal Lawson Bruce Frahm Scott McQueen Susanna Strand tlK'ni I |/«pr^ Equjt Opportunity Employer .A K ( II I I I h N «. I \ I I H s March 24, 1999 ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, J INC. Landscape Archiuctur* • Site Planning • Civil Engineering Mr. George Gorbatenko Wold Associates, Inc. 305 St. Peter Street St. Paul, MN 55102 RE: Proposed New Orono Middle Scnool Reconstruction of Orono High School Orono, Minnesota Dear George: As a response to condition item ^2 stated in the City of Orono’s Notice of Planning Commission Action (dated March 16, 1999), we offer the following comments: We have reviewed Wallace Case's letter dated, March 14, 1999. Our responses noted below correspond to Mr. Case's paragraphs. I Parking Lot Issues - Pedestrian traffic across islands will be directed over pavement. Also at these crossings, handicap ramps/access will be provided. Currently the 5% gradient in the parking lots and drives meets AD.A requirements. Of course, if these gradients can be decreased that would be our intent, f’owever due to the character of the site this lu.xurv mav not be obtainable. Landscaping will be provided around the High Sc!iool and Middle School bus/event parking areas as budget permits. Lighting - This issue is currently under review by Wold Architects. a Wetlands Creation - Plans and specifications are currently being reviewed by the .Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and, at present, preliminary' findings are generally positive. .Athletic Field Orientation - Due to school’s antic, lated coaching / supervision needs and to allow fle.xibility of the designed fields, the softball fields have been oriented as shown. Furthermore, the orientation of the soccer fields, although not preferred, allows for the largest length and width of the field (if fields were rotated north-south, the fields would fall below regulation size). At present benches, bleachers and permanent goals are not included in the project but may be installed in the future. 5.Landscaping - Mr. Case’s comments and suggestions w ill be taken into account when developing the final landscape plan for each of the project sites. As previously indicated, the amount of landscaping shown on the plans was provided in order to meet anticipated City guidelines. With the final design of the -'•unpus landscape master plan, we will strive to link the two schools with a distinct theme and a varied palette of plant material. Tree relocation issues will be further defined as we come closer to bidding the project. VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER • SUITE 200 • 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427 PH (612) 544-7129 • FAX (612) 544-0531 City Submission - Orono Schools Response Letter - 3/23/99 Page 2 6. 7. 8. 9. Middle School - As budget allows, landscaping will be provided along the west drop-off walk from the southern cross walk to the northern building entrance, in the large parking island, along the west edge of the parking lot and drive, and along the northern drop-off walk. High School - As budget allows, landscaping will be provided along the west side of the new walks, in pedestrian and parking islands, and along the north side of the event lot. Groupings of evergreens may be located in the area to the northwest and west of the event lot and around the NURP pond. Plant Palette - Additional varieties of plants will be utilized in the final landscape plan including, but not limited to Red Maple, Serviceberry, and Dogwood. Phasing - The School District has every intention of developing the Middle School and High School sites as a campus. With this, landscaping will be viewed as an important and integral part of the renovation and construction projects. As previously stated, the final landscaping plan will reflect more and varied plant material than shown on the CUP submission drav. ings. We feel that to require additional or phased planting as a condition of the approval is unnecessary. Erosion Control - Erosion Control and Storm Water Management Plans have been submitted to MCWD for their review. The required 26’ wide buffer along Basins 6 and 8 has been shown because there is no proposed grading within the limits (only buffer landscaping to deter school maintenance staff from mowing these areas). Tree and Woodland Protection - E.xisting trees will be proteciwd with snow fence at the drip line. The Removals Plan and Grading Plan will also indicate limits of construction so as to eliminate any possible damage to e.xisting woodland areas. We trust the above information addresses the issues at hand. If you have any other questions please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, AyDERSON-JOHNSONASSOCIA TES, INC. Jay R. Pomeroy, ASL.A Cc: Liz Van Zomeren - City of Orono File to KIM LIGHTING Type: Project; Catalog Number 'Zcu- j.--' :*i SPEC ShEE" cc/ccs Curvilinear Cutoff Series APM i =CS* 'ZP MOuriTED LL'MIMAiPE: / MCCCL * f il-SH O'*. ; > « H :m cc e scec ccc> e! e :r'' 5 cr CC series 17’ 2 r. 25 ' and 29' Diameter CCS series 17; 2125 and 29 D'a^cier . • j W KIM LIGHTING NC * - *: vS A * * . L •'' \r. ' • ' A V - iM -ir>'n - AX -I • i V '• • • CC17A j :;/■ V. ^»T« :-‘-.-'-“.';'i''t;/.y.«^; CC21A • *% S* o •, OPTIONS ' : Accent Reveals: (CC series only). Three aiurrinum oands riveted inside the housing valleys Availaoie *n four standard Kim pov-der coat finishes Custom colors available. Polycarbonate Shield; (1?; 2V and 25* models). Clear UV stabilized convex polycarbonate lens reoiaces standard flat glass lens, gasketeo and .ntegrai with lens frame 250 Watt maximum =:r 21* and 25* mcdeis. 400 Wan hPS s aiicwabie p locations where ambient air iempe'’ature wiH not exceed 85^F during ocerat cn Photocell: (17^ 21' and 25' models). Factory .nsta 'ed m housing, gasketed sensor on s^ce .vail : I Photocell Receptacle: (29^ model only). Factory nstailed gasketed receptacle on top of housing (for ^iEMA base photocells by others). — Houseside Shield: (1?: 21' and 25' models with Types II. Ilf, or IV distributions only). Clear anod»ced. stamped aluminum, bypass Icuvers on s^eetside. black anodized panel on housesido •*nacnes to ref'ectcr Nc»e Use with clear amps only. •8-‘ J-r1 3 -0 A»*$ ■ I•» J*box Dy Others Wall Mounting: (For poured concrete walls only). McMitieu Support arm with side access hole ?or e-o L*pncmg Zmc electro-plated steel embedment c: ac>et Vf casting v a J-ccx cc\er c-aie *or 'cx * fvsrvht *o rwyv *i\:,.rc 3 L \ o •- \ 3 • 10' 25'dU.- CC25A' ' ’ .Wpsd y,y\ • i.'•‘ic ■ .'f Certification: Under,vriters Laboratories listed (120. 203. 240. 277 and 430 Volt only) and Canadian Standards Assooiation certified (120 and 347 Volt only) for wet locations Housing: Spun alurnmum (CC series only: Three equally spaced Vi" nbs separated by ,•> valleys rolled into the housing to a minimum depth of Vi') Sidewaiis have a ma;<imum 1 ’ of taper, and are free of welds or fasteners A rpllformed aluminum flange is hemmed into the bottom providing supccrt for the reflector module An internal aluminum casting provides for mounting of the electrical module plus reinforcing for side-arm mounting of the fixiure Lens Frame Assembly: One piece cast aluminum lens frame is attached to the housing by a zmc plated cold rolled steel hinge with a stainless steel pin. Closure is by self-retained stainless steel screws; four provided for the 25' and 29' models, three provided for the 21' model, and a single screw for the 17' model. A stainless steel self-locking stop arm is provided to hold the lens frame in the open position while servicing. A V«’ thick clear flat tempered glass lens is fully gasketed by a one piece extruded and vulcanized silicone gasket. Lens is retained in the frame by removable zinc plated steel clips. Reflector Module: 17', 21' and 25' models have specular Alzak reflector segments mounted within a one piece hydroformed shell. 29' model has one piece hydroformed reflectors with a specular Alzak finish. Wire penetrations to the socket are sealed by a silicone gasket to create a totally sealed optical chamber. Reflector module hooks mto and out of the housing by no-tool release hinges, secures to the housing flange by a self- retained quarter turn fastener, is field-rotatable in 90® increments, and is— — . — Ml II I\i#i I Id UO, ai lU 19 factory prewired with a quick-disconnect plug. Sockets and ratings are as follows: 17'-HPS and MH medium base rated 4KV. 21'and 25 -HPS mogul base rated 4KV. MH pin-oriented mogul base. 29*-HPS mogul base rated 5KV. MH mogul base rated 4KV. Lamp Vibration Resistance: 21' and 25' MH models have a molded silicone lamp stabilizer which slips over a pin-oriented socket. 29' MH and HPS models have either a wire harness or a telescoping stabilizer v/hich holds the lamp tip Electrical Module: All electrical components are UL and CSA recognized, mounted on a single plate and factory prewired with puick-disconnect plugs Module attaches inside the hous ng ^smg keyhole slots All ballasts are high power factor rated for -20'F stadrpg Standard Arm Mounting: Arm is one piece extruded aluminum with internal bolt guides and fully radiusseo top and bottom Lummaire-to-poie attachment is by internal draw bolts, and mciudes a pole remforcmg plate with wire strain relief Arm is circular cut to mate with specified round pde Finish: TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat pamt available in Black. Dark Bronze. Light Gray or White. Po'wder coating is 2 5 mil nominal thickness with all components thoroughly cleaned and primed with a protective chrcrrate coating Warning: Fixtures must be grounded m accordance with local codes or the National Electrical Code Failure to do so may result m serious personal injury. <!M LIGHTING INC. *FA:;? l T aj - AvFM F Pi'' POx t r i K • I SAR3 SETS nitial Hcnzcntai 175 Watt Metal Halide ED 17. Dear Medium Base 13.500 initial Horizontal Lumens 10.125 Mean Horizontal Lumens ANSI Code M57-175 See p. 46 for same fixture with Houseside Shield Option.SAR 3- SET 0 Footcanaies at L sted Mounting Heic;nts 20 16 U 5 70 10 i 14 2 3 1 4 1 56 1 16 20 20 5 70 1 0 1 4 2 31 41 56 1 16 20 20 05 00 10 14 02 03 04 06 01 02 02 03 Cataicc Mo 2B/SAR3/175MH 2B/SET3/175MH Distnouticn Type III. Cutoff ITL Test Me 37773 Longitudinal Distance m Mounting Heights Dua. Initial Her zontai Foctcanoies a‘ sted Mounting eignts Catalog No 4C/SAR3/175MH 4C/SET3/175MH Distribution Type 111. Cutoff T L Test No 37773 uongitudmai Dista''ce m Mounting Heignts Ouac A •J ■ 2d"dia. VL 1000 Watt Metal Halide BT-56. Clear. Mogul Base 125.000 Initial Vertical Lumens 100.000 Mean Vertical Lumens ANSI Code M47PA-1000/BU/S Distribution; Square Beam Spread: Wide Catalog No: VL2SN5/1 I.T.L. Test No: 38772 Vertical Plane Through Kaximua CandeIa 170®/ ISO" / 130® Max. Candela at 67.5"V. 55’ H. CP Initial Horizontal Footcandles at Listed Mounting Heights 45*39'35’30- 4.4 5.9 7.3 10 2.2 3.0 3.7 5 .89 1.2 1.5 2 .44 .59 .73 1 .22 .30 .37 .5 .09 .12 .15 .2 .04 .06 .07 .1 Longitudinal Distance in Mounting Heights Longitudinal Distance in Mounting Heights 1 V •3 \\ 4 \|rs\-A-t V t >ts1 •2- Vj V 11 —1 \it •1\ \T" /141\ \ j i\r / ■T r /•2. J J /f A /t //r / J |/ //•3-1! 1\ / 1 // // // /.4,T A / / 7 '54■ House Side Street Side C. OI OIc c S c 0>ocro (A •mm o to C.o» Typical Syatea ft'intout - Area Lighting 1.22 1.32 1.27 1.21 1.25 1.26 1.28 1.28 1.22 1.12 1.04 1.00 1.26 1.36 1.32 1.28 1.31 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.22 1.13 1.06 1.04 1.36 1.51 1.47 1.45 1.45 1.47 1.45 1.34 1.24 1.16 1.13 1.12 1.60 1.75 1.73 1.74 1.72 1.73 1.61 1.42 1.27 1.24 1.22 1.22 1.90 2.08 2.12 2.13 2.15 2.10 1.60 1.54 1.42 1.35 1.31 1.27 2.33 2.55 2.70 2.71 2.67 2.35 2.00 1.80 1.62 1.45 1.31 1.27 3.00 3.16 3.38 3.42 3.08 2.57 2.36 2 12 1.74 1.46 1.30 1 24 3.91 3.93 4.46 4.04 3.08 3.10 2.71 2.17 1.72 1.44 1.23 1.23 5.05 5.07 5.34 3.97 3.91 3.47 2.79 2.17 1.73 1.43 1.26 1.20 6.11 5.92 5.34 5.40 4.51 3.45 2.77 2.11 1.70 1.45 1.31 1.26 6.46 7.24 5.92 5.23 3.99 3.20 2.58 2.10 1.74 1.50 1.36 1.32 •7.01 6.28 4.96 3.76 2.96 2.33 1.90 1.63 1.42 1.30 1.26 Area 175.0 Maintained Horizontal Footcandles - 30" Pole Height Analysis of Entire System: Maintained Average - 2.33 FC Maintained Minimun - i.OO FC Average/Minioua Uniformity ~ 2.31 Naxiwi/NiniMa uniforiity - 7.78 Data is based on a lighting system which may include contributions from surrounding fixtures equally spaced. 56 Kim Lighting r-eiORY TRANS REPORT :WOLD f=tf^HITECTS ( PPR 01 '99 05:25PM ) V K -I* M K H K ► K K > k \r k :K k K I > k k K t. ► k i FILEIFJ.FILE T'iPE DEPT. CODE PAGES RESULTS GROUP REMOTE TERMINAL IDENTIFICATION 158 SEND IMEDIATE 8111 0/11 E/4)4)4)4)4)ANDERSON-JOrtSSON 11/11 OK 6122494616 THIS FILE HAS BEEN CLEARED. REASCtI FOR ERROR 4^ NO FACSIMILE C0r4l€CT10H )k )k )k >K Jk 5K )k >k >k 5«C ♦ )k Dk .K % Hi )k H( Hi 5k Hi rk k^ki.kH'kski k.k4t’k*ik'k kiii kH kH?iH kH ik'k)^>|cHcMc5k?|*5Mt4t%Hc3k5kHc^:k5|<HiiMi^’kH kk^^^ I. I I I I. U O F r K A N S ,\ U r ARF .^PNntNG YOU •J tHil»l:H ^rl’AUAU.CON^U \M . »I I S maii '^TIUURJEK J___ HOUR U OVI RNI c .HTMAIL • I I IPS I HE FOUOWING ITEMi* C.UI'Y OF LETTER ( ()l»YOh DRAWINGS U BID SET J ATPrNPt/M TO: ......... • 4« »•• ««4 • ••.«••«•••••• ■••••tM ••••••••*•«•«•••• MU* •••«•••••••••tllr............ iWV^t - ^np Mir?^ p0m- ......C.OMMlSSi«XNU; ArTENTIONi RE- DATE Woln Ami .iiitoct ) ANb EMttiNfchft-i 305 ST. FkTEii STitBuf it. PAULi MN 55IOi <;5l.22^7f73 ■ AX 651 22.4.5640 2t5*H T<.-ti.OA'i^ R oah Llcin, U. 60123 •47.608.2600 TAX 847 608.J654 t.\i «ii vOit-4^MR utlri.sr NFr ..................... LMAII.; VOHli><.(!lH(*AOI rTllJ m ■• iri Ti‘//w»w.»'Oi L>At.<:o.*i coriLS Date Nt") 1.f/;M! ; 11 /. . .,!.//.....V: DESCRIPTION • •• •• ••••••«••»•*.•• I / 4*«••••••«•••«••••••■**••••*••• I X I I I Pte4f9i . "• ta ............ it»t* #»IM«••»mi.••••4•••»••••••••••••*•.•••• ••■•*• •••••♦• ♦••••••••• • 1..!. ^ I /^^6>rt^f^r7UcS .______________ /T\ RtMARKS: * ify I I I I r. K () I 1 U A N S ,\1 I I I A I TO: ........................................................ .......... attention ....,4l!.:?:............'M!YE&:SL....................... ......................... U/n EMAIL: 'JIOID^MN.USWI.ST.NIT DATE:......J±^J..Ll.....COM.MISSION NO: ........................ em \ii: \xou >eu ;in ^\u )| .com Wold A rchitects AND Engineers 305 St. Peter Street St. Paul . MN 55102 651.227.7773 FAX 651.223.5646 71 5-H Tollgati Road tu.iN. IL 60123 847.60.S.2600 lAX 847.608.2654 NEI: HI 1 P//\X'W>X.WOLI)AE.( 1>M COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION WE ARE SENDING YOU ^ATTACHED ^^NDER SEP.\RATE COVER VlAi N^.S. MAIL □ FACSIMILE □ COURIER □____ HOUR □ OVERNIGHT MAIL □ UPS THE FOLLOWING ITEMSi □ COPY OF LETTER JI^PYOF DRAWINGS □ BID SET □ ADDENDUM □ PROJECT MANUAL □ DETAIL OF CONSTRUCTION □ SHOP DRA>X1NGS □ PAY REQUEST □ S/AIPLES □ OTHER THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOWi □ FOR APPROVAL ^R TOUR USE REQUF5TED REVIEW AND COMMENT □ NO LXCEPTION TAKEN □ MAKE CORRECTIONS NOTED □ REVISE AND RESUBMIT □ REJECTED □ SUB.MIT CORRECTED COPIES □ FORPA^'MENT REMARKS: ^ V •CiTrUF •'-.vO FAX NO NO. FAX PAGES.M ................... SIGNED: ■5"""t/M ..... lU -J a xn r iUa >- V- IXn I w* tTiV, .•'^ J • _ 4% I. COUNCIL MEETING APR 1 2 1999REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE;UlVv> ITEM NO.; (3 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Direcior of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer ’s Report Item Description: Request for Payment #2, Lift Station Rehabilitation We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Payment ttl, to GHT Construction, Delano MN in the amount of $36,601.33 Bones trod Owner m Associates' City of Orono, 2750 Kellv Parkwav. PO Box 66. Crystal Bay. MN 55323-00( Date: March 22. 1999 ______ Request No:_______2 ^^Rosene period: February 25.1999 to March 19.1999 txwwtSA/thiwtgContractor: GHT Construction. Inc.. 2750 102nd Street SE. Delano. MN 55328 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT LIFT STATION NO. 13 REHABILITA'nON BRA FILE NO. 139-98-800 SUMMARY I Original Contract Amount Change Order • Addition Change Order - Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 5% 9 Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Previously II AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 2 3 4 5 6 7 S S s, s s s s s s s Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCUTES, ESC. GHT CONSTR. ESC. a! // Approved by Owner. CITY OF ORONO -YU Specified Contract Completion Date: MAY 31. 1999 Date: K.A139U3»-98-nwOROVREQUEST2.WB2 •I 107.900.00 107.900.00 105.000.00 0.00 105.000.00 5.250.00 99.750.00 63,148.67 36.601.33 Contract Unit Quantity Current Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price to Date Quantity to Date Approved Alternate No. 1 1 Temporarv’ controls, pumps and piping Tor interim conveyance LS 1 5,500.00 0.91 0.63 5,000.00 2 Lift station demolition or new valve vault LS 1 6.800.00 0.88 0.88 6,000.00 3 New pumps, piping, valves, wet well, top hatch, and slab LS 1 74,000.00 1.00 0.40 74.000.00 4 New control panel, base slab, and miscellaneous electrical LS 1 20,000.00 1.00 1.00 20,000.00 5 Seeding with 4 inch topsoil SY 30 4.00 6 Sod with 4 inch topsoil SY 10 8.00 7 8 inch Class S aggregate base TN 17 40.00 8 3 inch thick bituminous driveway TN 8 90.00 1 i TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE $105,000.00 K;\139\139-M- 1\WORO\nEQUEST2.WB2 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS 0'»'ner City of Orono Project No. File No. 139-98-800 Contractor GHT Constr. Inc. CHANGE ORDERS No.Date Description Amount 1 2 3 Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY No.Period Payment Relainaee Completed 1 Start 02/25/99 63.148.67 3J23.61 45.500.00 2 02/25/99 03/19/99 36,601.33 5.250,00 105,000.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date S99.750.00 Orisinal Contract SI 07.900.00 Retoinaec, Payment No. 2 5.250.00 Cbanec Orders Total Amount Earned SI 05.000.00 Revised Contract SI 07.900.00 K;\139U 39-98- 1\WORO\«EOUEST2.WB2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETING APR 1 2 1999 CITY OF ORONO Date: April 8,1999 Item No. Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. GafTron* Title: Senio: Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Woodhill Country Club - Authoriitation to Hold CUP Public Hearing at a Special Council Meeting - Choose Date Woodhill Country Club will shortly apply for a Conditional Use Permit requesting approval for access to the Club via Woodhill Avenue. Council must unanimously waive referral of this application to the Planning Commission in order for the public hearing to be held at a special Council meeting in early May. Council also is requested to choose a date for that hearing to be held. The earliest possible date in which all hearing notification requiremems can be met is Tuesday May 4. Other possible dates are Thursday May 6 and Tuesday May 11. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to waive referrral of the Woodhill CUP application to Planning Commission, and establish a date for a public hearing to be held by the Council on this application. • •1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: AprU 12, 1999 ITEM NO iq Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Request for Payment #6, Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Payment #6, to Shank Constructors, Brooklyn Park MN in the amount of $135,657.00. ■mm ^^””Ov>.Tier City of Orono. 2750 Kelly Pkwy. Orono. NIN 55323-0066 Date: Aprils, 1999 Period: March 5.1999 to April 2. 1999Asioaates-------------------- -----------------------Request No: tiKi«i««f»* ArtutwwContractor: Shank Constructors. Inc.. 3501 85th Ave N. Brooklyn Park. MN 55445 REQUEST FOR PAV'MENT NAVARRE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY RENOVATION BRA FILE NO. 13997 APR 0 9 1999 cu t Ur UnOiMO SUMMARY I Original Contract Amount Change Order • Addition Change Order - Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 5% 9 Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Previously II AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 2 3 4 5 6 7 S S 5.500.00 s s s s s s s s Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCLATES. INC. — A Approved by Contractor: SHANK CONSTRUCTORS, LNC. Approved by ONMier: CITY OF ORO.NO Specified Contract Completion Date: 5-15-99 Date: K:\t 39\1399AWORO\REQUEST6.WB2 636.600 642.100 574.154 0.00 574.154 28.708 545.446 409.789 135.657 1 No. Item Contract Unit Quantity Unit Quantity Current Amount Price to Date Quantity to Date Total price for the renovation of the Navarre Water Treatment Faciiity. including demoiition, process equipment (by base bid manufacturers, as described in Pan HI of this Proposal) plumbing, H VAC. eiectrical work, controis and instrumentation, process piping, painting, and aii other items shown, specified, or implied to place the faciiity into fuli operation for the LUMP SUM of:LS 636,600.00 Breakdown of above: 1 Mobilization & Div. 1 37,894.00 100%37,394 2 Demo - Lab.12,944.00 100%*12,944 3 Demo - Mat.11,850.00 100%11,850 4 Concrete Bonom - Lab.10,121.00 100%10,121 5 Concrete Bottom - Mat.10,360.00 100%10460 6 Div. 5 - Lab.493.00 100%100%493 7 Div. 5 - Mat.1,173.00 100%100%1.173 S Div S. Lab.1,190.00 S 9 Div. 8 - .Mat.4,989.00 iO Softening Equip • Ext.5,200.00 40%2.0S0 ii Softening Equip - Int.9,000.00 100%9,000 i2 Filter Equip • Ext.13400.00 40%5.400 13 Filler Equip - Int.31,000.00 100%31.000 i4 Piping & Valves 13,600.00 25%3.400 i5 Interior 6,600.00 i6 Filter Equip - Lab.15,692.00 100%15.692 i7 Filter Equip - Mat.53,793.00 100%53.793 iS Softening Equip • Lab.2452.00 100%2.352 i9 Softening Equip • Mat.17,038.00 100%17.03S 20 Filter Media - Lab.4400.00 100%4.200 2i Filter Media • Mat.28,375.00 100%28.375 Softening .Media • Lab.563.00 100%563 23 Softening Media - Mat.18,554.00 100%18.554 24 Chemical Feed - Lab.7,352.00 60%60%o 4.411 25 Chemical Feed • Mac.8493.00 100%8493 26 Pumps - Lab.7,500.00 100%loor.7.500 27 Pumps - Mat.16,827.00 100%16.827 2S Blower - Lab.5,987.00 100%sor.5.9ST 29 Blower - .Mat.6,757.00 100%6.757 30 Piping & Valves - Lab.26,922.00 100%45%26,922 3i Piping & Valves - Mat.87,131.00 100%30*/'o 87.181 K:\l3S\13S9nWORO\REQUEST6.WB2 32 Hvac 33 Electrical 34 Steel 35 Welding 36 Grinding 37 Paint Ceiling 16.200.00 134,000.00 1,200.00 5.500.00 2.300.00 3.500.00 100% 81% 60% 86% 91.7% 29% 57J% 66% 29% 16,200 108.540 700 4.751 2,109 1.594 Total Work Completed To Date 574,154 - t K:\139M 3997\WORD\REQUEST6.WB2 PROJECT P-WMEiNT STATUS Owner CITYOFORONO Project No. File No. Contractor SHANK CONSTRUCTORS. INC. CHA-NGE ORDERS No.Date Descriptioo Amount 1 03/04/99 Refer to Chanse Order No. 1 5.500.00 2 3 Total Chaoge Orders S5.500.00 P.A'k'MENT SUMMARY .Material on Hand 0.00 1 Start 10/31/98 79.313 4.174 58.969 2 10/3 !/9S 12/01/98 19.149 5.182 103.644 3 12/01/98 01/05/99 86.430 9.731 146.770 4 01/05/99 01/28/99 165.139 18.423 368.453 5 01/28.99 03/05/99 59.759 21.568 431.357 6 03/05/99 04/02/99 135.657 28.708 574.154 T S 9 10 Total Payment to Date S545.446 Original Contract S636.600.00 Retaina^c. Pavment No. 6 S28.703 Change Orders 5.500.00 Total Amount Earned S574.154 Revised Contract S642.I00.00 ItM 3<3\1 ■<907\WOf<O«nCU"ST6.WB2 COUNCIL MEETING APR 1 2 199V REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF OHUi w DATE: April 12, 1999 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer ’s Report Item Description: Change Order #2, Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation This change order is for pressure grouting of the concrete floor slab in the Navarre water treatment plant. During the pi mt rehabilitation project, it was discovered that the original sand fill under the concrete floor slab has settled resulting in voids under the slab. This could result in settlement and cracking of the floor slab and possible pipe breakage or equipment damage. This problem can be corrected by injecting grout to fill the void spaces under the floor. We are recommending approval of a change order for completion of this pressure grouting by Solidification Inc., through the existing contract with Shank Constructors. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Change Order #2 in the amount of $6,000 for pressure grouting of the concrete floor slab in the Navarre water treatment plant. BonwtrooL Ros«ne City of Orono. 2~50 Kelly Parx^iy. PO Box 66. Crystal Bay. MN 5S32______Date April?. 1999 Shank Constructors. Inc. 3501 85th Avc N, Brooklyp Parle, MN 55445 *'y^.yg!!!S!Sir^ond Co. XV A Lane. 2100 Lasalle Plaza. 800 Lasalle Ave. Minneapolis, N1N 55402 change ORDER NO. 2 NAVARRE water TREATMENT FACILITY RENOVATION FILE 13997 Description of Work The project included removal of a two foot square section of the concrete floor for access to the flnished water riser pipe. After removal of the concrete, it was found that a six>inch deep void was present from the bottom of the concrete to the sand fill below. Four one-inch diameter holes were drilled Arougkout die water plant, and void spaces were found at three of the four locations. The void spaces are the result of settlement that occurred after the building was constructed in 1971. m U V 1999 giTT OF OROi\0 Due to the weight of the equipment and the mir imal reinforcing in the floor slab, the void space should be filled with sand / portland cement grout to provide adequate support. Without adequate support, the floor slab could break and drop which would result in equipment or piping breakage. Since the e.xtent of the work required cannot be accurately quantified at this Htn^, the w’ork will be completed on a unit price basis for labor and materials and on a cost plus basis for grout material. The grout may be muted on-site or delivered by a ready mix company, depending on the quantity required. The appro.xiroately quantity required will be determined after drilling injection pons in the floor slab. This work shall be performed by Solidification, Inc., through the existing contract with Shank Constructors, Inc. No.Item Unit Contract Quantitv Unit Price Total Amount Mobilization' Demobilization Labor «St Equipment Grout Estimated Total Cost LS Dav I 525.00 1.5 2.100.00 Cost‘d-15% S525.00 S3.150.00 S6.000.00 "1 Original Contract Amount Previous Change Orders This Change Order Revised Contract Amount (iocludmg this change order) S636.600.00 S5.500.00 S6.000.00 S648.100.00 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCUTES, INC. date: Approved by Contractor: 0 Approved by Owner: cc: Owner Contractor Bonding Company Bonestroo & Assoc. i{- i r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: April 2,1999 Item No.: | ^ Department Approval: Name: Michael P. GafTron Title: Senior Plannmg Coordinator Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Sewer Connection Approval, 465-485 Orono Orchard Rd. S. - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Council Minutes 3-22-99 On March 22 Council voted 4-0 to approve the request of Edward Hamm to allow his principal residence and 2 caretaker/guest residences to connect to municipal sewer. Approval was conditioned on limiting the sewer to just the three existing dwellings, with a deed covenant being executed by Hamm stating that this parcel can be developed into no more than three lots, and all costs of sewer extension and connection fees be paid by the applicant. Council directed that staff prepare a resolution identifying the reasons why this situation is unique, and formalizing the limitations that will be placed on the property. Guest House CDP's Needed In reviewing City files, it has been determined that the two existing guest/caretaker units have never been formally acknowledged via the appropriate Guest House conditional use permits, nor has any separate caretaker apartment in the principal dwelling been so formalized. Given the currrent action to bring sewer to said units, it would be appropriate to condition £q)proval on applicant obtaining the appropriate CUP for the guest units on the property. This has been incorporated as a condition in the attached resolution approving sewer connections. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution including findings and conditions for the approval of sewer connection for property located at 465-485 Orono Orchard Road South per the request of Edward Hamm. 1 j A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR SEWER CONNECTION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 465-485 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH WHEREAS, Edward Hamm (hereinafter "applicant") is the owner of property in the City of Orono located at 465-485 Orono Orchard Road (hereinafter "the property") legally described as follows: Exhibit A attached; and WHEREAS, the property is approximately 18 acres in area and contains a principal residence structure containing 8 bedrooms and two individual guest house or caretaker house structures each containing 1 bedroom, which would normally require 3 individual septic systems and 3 alternate drainfield sites; and WHEREAS, the existing septic systems serving the 3 dwelling units are interconnected and have exhibited intermittent failure for many years, and are also nonconforming due to lack of 3' separation from the zone of seasonal saturation; and WHEREAS, a site evaluation has been completed by a licensed Site Evaluator and it has been determined that the property contains only two suitable drainfield sites instead of the six that would normally be required, and use of such sites would have the following negative impacts: 1.Use of the tested sites would require continued interconnection of septic systems serving three individual dwellings, and the associated complexities and problems inherent in such interconnections. 2.Use of the suitable primary septic site would require the removal of at least three mature pine trees and jeapordize other trees in the area; use of the alternate site would similarly result in the removal of younger trees which provide screening and would similarly jeapordize mature trees in the immediate area. Page 1 of 4 "n 3.Both tested sites would place a drainfield less than the City minimum requirement of 75' from the existing well. 4.The heavy clay !;oils on the site tend to create a somewhat higher risk of system failure than other soil types, posing a potential threat to public health, safety and welfare. 5. If the system failed, it would impact 3 separate dwellings, not just one; and WHEREAS, the property is adjacent to the existing MUSA and is near existing municipal sewer lines which can feasibly be extended to serve the property; and WHEREAS, the property substantially meets the criteria established by tlie City for use of tlie 50 'floating' sewer units approved by the Metropolitan Council for properties outside the MUSA boundary; and WHEREAS, the applicant has indicated he will pay all costs associated with extension of the existing municipal sewer, connection charges, etc. and will agree to permanently limiting development of the 18-acre site to just 3 dwelling units, via deed covenants or other suitable instruments; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that permanently limiting development of this 18-acre parcel to 3 dwelling units would be in keeping with the City's rural low-density philosophy as detailed in the Orono Community Management Plan, and would provide an ultimate level of development that is suitable for the site given the various site development constraints including wetlands, steep slopes, etc.; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that, in combination, the factors and findings noted above establish that this is a unique situation as compared to others, and that there is a substantial basis to allow approval of the sewer connection subject to appropriate conditions. Page 2 of 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota does hereby approve extension of municipal sewer to the property at 465-485 Orono Orchard Road subject to the following conditions: 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. Applicant shall pay all actual costs associated with extension of a municipal sewer line to the property boundary, upon billing of said costs to the applicant. The extension of municipal lines shall be completed by a contractor hired by the City based on a design to be completed by the City Engineer. Additionally, applicant shall pay a connection charge for each of the three dwelling units based on the current connection charge for the 1980-1 Minnetonka Bluffs project, an amount equal to 3 x $10,930 per the current City fee schedule or a total of $32,790. The connection charge shall be due prior to issuance of a connection permit for each dwelling unit. Additionally, 3 Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) units will be due at the time of issuance of a connection permit for each dwelling unit. Applicant shall execute a deed covenant in a foim acceptable to the City Attorney that permanently limits development of the property for residential uses to no more than three (3) dwelling units. The three existing dwelling units may be replaced if applicant chooses to do so, subject to all appropriate permits; and nothing in this approval shall prohibit the applicant from developing the property into three individual lots each containing one dwelling unit. Applicant shall formally apply for and obtain a Guest House conditional use permit (C.UP) for tp>t two guest/caretaker units on the property, prior to connection of said units to the (Municipal sewer. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 4 Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota on this 12th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor (1) Property Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 12th day of April, 1999 by Linda S. Vee and Gabriel Jabbour, City Clerk and Mayor respectively, of the City of orono, a Muinesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _day of , 1999 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 / ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22,1999 ‘ ^ ' Thomas indicated that his interview is on April 13, with the board voting on April 20th. Mayor Jabbour suggested this item be discussed at their Thursday morning woric session and to authorize Staff to draft a letter sup^rting Mr. Thomas but to delay sending It until after the April 12th City Council meeting in the event that another candidate approaches the City requesting their support. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (#16) HAMM SEWER REQUEST - 485 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD Bruce Palmer, on behalf of Edward Hamm, was present. Gaffron stated that the City has received an updated letter of request and a site evaluation report indicating that the potential drainfield site northeast of the house is usable; however, there are some minor downsides relating to use of the site. Number one, three large pine trees will have to be removed to make use of the primary site; and number two, a portion of a wooded newer-growth buffer area between the house and the road would have to bo removed to make use of the alternate site. Gaffron stated that this 18 acre parcel Is also limited In that It contains only one viable septic site and is unlikely that It could support more than two or three normal sized homes In total. With CHy sewer, the site might be able to accommodate as many as seven or eight homes based on a two acre minimum lot size. Palmer expressed concerns that the well would be located approximately 55 to 63 feet from the septic site, existing trees and overgrowth would need to be removed, and the close location of the septic site to the residence. Palmer stated In his opinion hookup to City sewer is reasonable in this case due to those concerns. Palmer noted that the Applicant Is willing to assume the costs for sewer hookup and Is willing to stipulate that future development vHII be limited. Gaffron commented that this residence is near to the City’s ejdsting sewer system. Mayor Jabbour stated if sewer hookup is approved, the City needs to demonstrate a hardship for Page 9 I 1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22,1999 /■^ * this property. Jabbour commented the CHy needs to establish certain guidelines which should be considered before sewer hookup is approved for any application. Gaffron stated the findings of the City Council are incorporated into the resolution adopted by the Council. Flint noted this application satisfies three out of four criteria established by the Metro Council, Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the sewer request by Edward Hamm, 485 Orono ^ Orchard Road, based on the recommendation of CHy Staff, subject to sevrer hookup being Z. ^ limited to the three existing dwellings with a deed covenant being executed by the Applicant *7' f ■ stating that this parcel can be developed Into no more than three lots, and all costs of hookup being borne by the Applicant. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. v< "* P IS MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Jabbour stated the meeting regarding the Dakota Rail to Trail was very positive and he is happy with the outcome. Jabbour indicated they are awaiting the results from MNDot, noting there Is a willingness between the parties to continue to cooperatively work together to make this project possible. Mayor Jabbour stated at the meeting he suggested that a committee be formed with Long Lake to look at consolidation between Long Lake and Orono and to look at the long-term goals of the two communities. Jabbour suggested that Jim Murphy. Mark Ingerson. Mr. Otten, and Mary Beth Christianson be considered for that committee. Flint recommended that the City look at appointing representatives from different sections of the community to give the committee an overall view of the City. Sansevere stated that In his view a representative from the Navarre area should be appointed -u ^ lOOsh • ^ r s 7T ■» t /I I.' 0 .s 9w provided they are welt-qualined for this committee, noting that Rick Meyers is from the Navarre area.y j Flint commented that the Casco Point area should also be represented. Flint inquired how many as 7» Ikc I K REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL WlF-eUNQ APR 1 2 »99 CITY OF ORQNO DATE; April 8, 1999 ITEM NO:n Department Approval: Name RonMoorsc THIe City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Appointment of a Contact Person for the Orono School District's Healthy Conununities/Healthy Youth Initiative Attached is a letter from Teri Cain, a coordinator of the Healthy Communities/Healthy Youth program that is a joint collaborative between the Orono School District and the YMCA. The letter requests the City to appoint a contact person for the Orono School District's Healthy Communities/ Healthy Youth program. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to appoint a contact person for the Orono School District's Healthy Communities/Healthy Youth Initiative. i 03/12/1999 12:29 479-1333 IHDUHAPI PAGE 01aHEALTHY YOUTHORONO - YMCA COIXAB|oRAT1VE PROGRAMSYMCACamp lUduhapi, Box 37, Loretto MN 55357 -|phon«: (612) 479-1146 FAX: (612) 479-1333 March 12, 1999 Dear Mayor and City Council members, | inromwtion CNchange between vour council and thi^ youth and family initiative. Tliiee cities lla^e named their representatives and tliree have yet to. We would appreciate having your designate named by May 1 . I Our initiative’s executive committee meets monthlyland generates a bi-raontWy newsletter city councils and other key contacts in the district refeive. However, it would help us fot you to appoint one individual who would be the touchstone for information exchange. ®“‘ collaborative and its relationship with Hennepin County has formalized, we want “ have a clear, two-way path of communication with all our cities As we move forw ard "S new funding for prevention and intervention seiviccf, it is vital that each «'>■ has input of the collaborative. Of course, you are all welcome to attend any of the board meeutigs h typically held the second Thursday of each month from 9;30-l 1:00 a.in., usually at Christ Luther (Thuich in Maple Plain. Please forward your designute’s name and phone mtinbers to either myself or to ^eLuca at 449-8351 . Also, please call us with any questions oi^ suggestions you might have. Thank you to .. ____ .... at. 1 .. • ■ 1 a ... .^..s *... S c wmw hi lilt 1 CS 1 U y^OUl Cl t^^ ■your attention to this important connection for famil Sincerely, Tcri Cain Youth & Family Development Coordinator jr REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MEETINGAPR 1 2 199VCITY OF Ohoi wDATE: April 9, 1999ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Resignation of Jamie Gemar Jairae Gemar, who has been employed with the City in an office support capacity for ‘>>irt«n ye«^ has resigned from her position with the City effective Apnl 2, 1999. It is necessary for the City Council to officially accept her resignation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to accept the resignation of Jamie Gemar effective April 2,1999. COUNCIL MEETING APR I 2 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF OHO/VO DATE: April 8, 1999 ITEM NO; 1^ Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Rq)ort Item Description: Update Regarding New Area Code Options Attached is a memo from Jim Strommen, the Attorney for the Suburban Rate Authority, which represents suburban cities on public utilities issues. The letter is related to proposed options for adding area codes to the metro area. The letter indicates that even if the City of Minneapolis was given the 612 area code, the western suburban area will need to be split into two area codes in the near future. This split is proposed to occur along I-394/Hwy. 12. If the split were to strictly follow I-394/Hwy. 12, it would divide Orono, Long Lake and several other cities. The Council may want to indicate general support for the north/south split of the western suburban area but indicate that the split must occur along City boundaries rather than strictly following I- 394/Hwy. 12. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED; Motion to direct a response be provided to the Suburban Rate Authority regarding the City's position concerning the area code split of the west metro suburban area. Kennedy -—-ik—^ Graven r 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street CHARTERED Minneapolis MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fix http://www.kennedy-gravcn.com R?-C2iV5D MAR 2 5 1999 01 n Gr wnOKO James M. Strommen Attorney at Law Direct Diai (612)337-9233 email: istrommcn@kcnncdv-graven.com MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: SRA Delegates/Altemates/City Managers/City Administrators Jim Strommen March 24,1999 612 Area Code Decision As you have read in the newspapers, on March 22,1999, the PUC met and decided the next phase of issues relating to the 612 area cede. The PUC’s ultimate decision under the facts presented at the hearing followed the SRA's stated position, namely to maintain municipal boundaries in a geographic split and not to adopt the overlay proposal. The SRA decided not to take a position on which region should keep 612. It was clear from the number exhaustion evidence, however, that the suburbs would not be able to keep 612, plus the 612 wireless numbers. Suburbs would have faced another split in approximately three years, dividing the suburbs again between 612 and a new number. This would have violated FCC guidelines for exhaust periods. Having concluded that the suburbs must receive 952, a new development at the hearing was the issue of establishing three rather than two area codes. Driving that issue was the continual updating of exhaust periods resulting in a determination that a two area code split (Minneapolis and suburbs) would not give enough assurance that a further split would not be necessary in the near future. As a result of this development, the PUC has tentatively decided to divide the western suburbs along the municipal boundaries along 1-394 highway. The PUC inquired of me regarding the SRA’s position on two rather than one code in the western suburbs. 1 could not represent that an 1-394 dividing point was the SRA position because it had not been presented to the SRA. I suggested to the PUC, however, that this geographical split of the western suburbs made sense as a natural division approximately in the middle of the western Minneapolis suburbs. JMS-153048 KG400-I SRA Delegates/Altemates/City Managers/City Administrators March 24,1999 Page 2 Following is additional information about the decision you or your council may find helpful in explaining to interested residents. GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT VERSUS OVERLAY I have spoken with many of you regarding your positions and the position of your councils regarding these two models. You have uniformly supported the geographic split along municipal boundaries. The PUC continues to accept that position, rejecting wire center boundaries as dividing committees and arbitrary from a customer standpoint in a heavily populated area. The issue with the PUC is whether the overlay is a better long-term solution. The arguments that people still value geographic identity; seven-digit dialing within their local area and want to avoid the increasing confusion of overlays still prevailed (by a 3 to 2 margin). The overlay argument was stronger this time because the telecom competitors generally, but not completely, endorse the overlay. 612 VERSUS 952 The SRA maintained its position that 612 should stay with that area where it makes the most sense from an exhaust and policy standpoint. The split as originally proposed, keeping 612 in the western suburbs, would not have worked because of the exhaust problem. In other words, if the suburbs had kept 612 and Minneapolis had been assigned 952, the projections show that within two to three years the PUC would be forced to make a decision again of splitting the 612 between North and South suburbs. The exhaustion balance in keeping the 612 with Minneapolis worked much better. Also, the heavy concentration of large businesses and the fact that Minneapolis is the Twin Cities center in many ways probably influenced the PUC. TWO-WAY VERSUS THREE-WAY SPLIT The SRA had been polled on the overlay versus a two way split. There had been no proposal for a three way split and, therefore, no boundaries to which the SRA could react. At the hearing, the PUC asked me regarding an SRA position for a three way split. I had been able to contact a couple of SRA representatives in potentially affected communities (over the noon hour). I indicated that while I could not represent an SRA position because it had not been discussed, the position of the SRA would logically remain with municipal boundary splits whether exhaustion needs required one or two area codes in the suburbs. The reaction I had received fi'om the SRA delegates with whom I had spoken over the noon hour were consistent with that position, no to the overlay and yes to mumcipal boundaries whether there would be one or two area codes. The long-term benefit of two area codes in the western Minneapolis suburbs is the near certainty or at least high probability that no further splits will be necessary. The location of the split was also put to me by the PUC. Based on a mid-way geographic point, some division of commerce and the “natural” 1-394 divider, I suggested that may be an appropriate location along municipal boundaries. JMS-I602II SUI60-31 SRA Delegates/Altemates/City Managers/City Administrators March 24,1999 Page 3 The PUC has tentatively adopted that split, subject to the Numbering Plan Administrator granting a PUC request for two rather than one area code number. We already have the 952; the PUC would need to obtain an additional number. The plan would be that the two new area code numbers would then be applied simultaneously to the two new area codes. Therefore, people would only be required to make the change once. A certain amount of seven-digit dialing would remain, many communities of interest would remain and the overlay addition of new area codes would not occur. COST US West strongly opposed a geographic split along municipal boundaries, in part because of the added cost of making the divisions. US West, however, was able to execute it in Phase I without much difficulty. It does not appear that it will pass on the cost of the Phase I split to ratepayers. A double split in Phase II is estimated by US West to be a much higher cost (approximately $6 million for Phase I versus $20 million for Phase II). The PUC asked me whether our position was dependent on the ratepayers not being required to bear some or all of the cost of this split. I indicated that this was a policy-based decision and was not driven by whether or not ratepayers would be assessed at a later time for these costs. I stated that there is an argument that US West has waived its right to recover costs for these area code splits under its Alternative Form of Regulation. The SRA reserved its right to make those arguments. Yet, if the PUC allows these costs to be assessed against ratepayers, as many costs incurred by the utilities are, the SRA is aware of this possibility and would not change its position on that basis. SUMMARY It is clear, though not reflected at all in newspaper accounts, that the SRA position regarding geographic splits along municipal boundaries was again a primary driving force to the DPS and ultimate PUC decision. The multiple splits made necessary because of number exhaustion, however, make this a more expensive process. Further, the new area codes will be an adjustment to people living in the suburban area—a one-time adjustment. I emphasized to the PUC the public policy priority taken by the SRA cities and their willingness to stand by this policy position, notwithstanding potential criticism from residents and businesses that must change their number. The easy appeal of the overlay is to keep the existing number and give the new numbers to the “new guy” later on. Yet, the overlay has the increased confusion factor of new codes within another area code, as well as the tendency to divide by time. The decision described above is subject to the Number Plan Administrator giving the PUC the two numbers it requests. If that request is denied, the PUC will have to reconvene. The SRA can also expect that US West will petition the PUC to change its position and adopt the overlay. JMS-I602II SU160-3I SRA Delegates/Altemates/City Managcre/City Administrators March 24,1999 Page 4 Please contact me by email with any infonnation you hear or thoughts you have on the matter at istrommen@kennedv-graven.com . Thank you for your input. The SRA has had a very influential role in the PUC’s decision in this difficult area code matter. The Twin Cities remain tlie only metro area in the United States using municipal boundaries to divide area codes. The SRA can take credit for this, with great technical assistance from the DPS. Ii 1 JMS-160211 SU160-31 itireaaiitasrmxsicuaB COUNCIL MEETING APR I 2 19yyREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITYOFOhuiw DATE: April 9, 1999 ITEM NO Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Scheduling of Infdraiational Open Houses Regarding the City's Comprehensive Plan Update At its April 8, 1999 work session, the City Council discussed scheduling two informational open houses regarding the update of the City's Comprehensive Plan. These open houses are to be scheduled in early to mid-May, with one to be held at the Gray Freshwater Center. Potential dates for the open houses are as follows: Tuesday, May 4 Thursday, May 6 Tuesday, May 11 Tuesday, May 18 Thursday, May 20 The meetings would begin at 7:00 p.m. Staff is recommending that the first open house be held at the Orono High School Cafeteria to ensure sufficient space to accommodate what could potentially be a large turnout. Once the Council selects the dates for the open houses, staff will follow through to publicize the meetings. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to select dates for two informational open houses regarding the City's Comprehensive Plan update. r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCJL MEETING APR I 2 1999 CITY Or DATE: April 9, 1999 ITEM NO: / Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Resignation of Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator Liz Van Zomeren, the City's Planner and Zoning Administrator, has submitted her resignation effective * iril 9, 1999. It is necessary for the Council to officially accept her resignation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: COUNCIL APR \ 2 1999REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF ORONO DATE: April 9, 1999 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Stephen Weckman Title On-Site Systems Manager Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Minnesota Rules Amenoments - Related to Septic Systems (Jan. 1996 to April 1999) Minnesota Rules 1996 An association of professional contractors, the Minnesota On-Site Sewage Treatment Contractors Association (MOSTCA), petitioned the legislators for several years to eliminate licensing fees from each local unit of government and create one set of standards for the installation, repair and maintenance of on site sewage treatment systems. The contractors and most local and State government agencies thought it would be beneficial to have one set of standards for use statewide. In January of 1996 the Minnesota Legislature finally revised the Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 (Rules) and required their use as a minimum standard statewide. The newly adopted Rules were very strict and included provisions that would require repair or replacement of over 50% of all existing on-site sewage treatment systems. New definitions defined any existing system that did not meet a three foot separation between the drainfield and the seasonal water table as "failing" and the local unit of government was required to order repair of the system within a reasonable period of time. Cesspools were defined as an "imminent threat to public health or safety" and their removal was required within ten months. Prior to the Rule changes existing systems were "grandfathered" and repairs were only required when bedroom additions were made or when surface discharge created an "imminent threat to public health or safety. The Rule changes had a large impact since several "triggers" were added which required compliance inspections on existing septic systems. The Rule changes required compliance inspections and the repair of non-compliant systems prior to a permit approval for all bedroom additions, bathroom additions and for improvements within the Shoreland District. In addition, the State required a disclosure be submitted to the buyer on any property sale and a disclosure by anyone other than the homeowner must determine the system compliance to the three foot separation and to identify cesspools. Also, local units of government were required to establish an inspection program to identify septic system compliance. The 1996 Rules created many problems since existing systems were required to meet the same standards as new systems and the legislators received many complaints. Most complaints were the result of failed property transactions since failing septic systems had to be repaired or replaced before the mortgage company would approve a loan. Also, many of the septic systems that did not pass a compliance inspection were newer systems or systems that were thought to be compliant. r Request for Council Action continued Page 2 April 9. 1999 Minnesota Rules Amendments - Septic Systems Mortgage companies would not typically approve a loan where a non-compliant system was involved unless money was held in escrow (usually 150% of the septic system replacement cost) until repairs could be made regardless of the local ordinances regarding repair deadlines. Due to the huge impact these strict standards had on homeowners, legislators received many complaints regarding the new rules. Minnesota Rules 1997 The Minnesota Legislature amended the rules again during the 1997 legislative session to reduce the impact of the new Rules on homeowners. One major rule change was the "grandfathering" of existing systems installed before January 16, 1996 that meet a two foot separation to the seasonal water table. The legislature also determined that certificates of compliance for existing septic systems shall be valid for three years and new systems shall be valid for five years unless the local unit of government finds an "imminent threat to public health and safety". An allowance was added for local standards to be less restrictive than the Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 if they can be shown to protect public health and the environment. A provision was added to allow the installation of "warrantied systems"; new systems which have not yet been proven to work effectively, but the company who designed the system must warranty it for at least five years. Another new provision was added which allowed "performance systems"; new systems shown by research to meet a specific level of treatment, but have not yet been approved by the State as a "new technology". Both "warrantied systems" and "performance systems" are optional for inclusion by local units of government who must then approve and enforce a monitoring plan. Minnesota Rules 1998 Continuing complaints regarding the new Rules resulted in another revision in 1998. The revisions will be incorporated into the Rules after public hearings are conducted. The Rule changes will be probably be completed by December 1999. The only significant Rule change this time is to define any septic system using a cesspool as a "failing system" instead of an "imminent threat to public health or safety" as it was in the 1996 and 1997 Rules. This change means that the local unit of government can determine the repair deadline for a system with a cesspool rather than being required to repair the system within ten months as required for an "imminent threat to public health or safety". Some minor language revisions are also proposed which have a limited impact in Orono. Summary The Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 have changed twice since 1996 by Statute, but no revised language was distributed until February 1999. We at the City have been following the Rule changes incorporated by the newly adopted Statutes, however, we could not change our Municipal Code until the MFC A completed their chwges. Although their proposed Rule changes are available for review, it is very likely that some changes will occur as a result of public hearings scheduled this month. I Request for Council Action continued Page 3 April 9, 1999 Minnesota Rules Amendments - Septic Systems The changes to Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 have had a large impact in Orono We were forced into identifying the compliance of existing systems that were previously "grandfathered" and requiring that repairs be made to these systems. The Rule was then changed to "grandfather" systems meeting a two foot separation to the seasonal water table. Cesspools in 1996 were considered to be an "imminent threat to public health and safety" and was changed in 1998 to be "failing". The Orono Municipal Code must be revised to reflect the changes to the Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080. I have provided this memo as an overview of the Minnesota Rules changes, but please let me know if you want more detailed information. 1 will be preparing revisions to Section 12.30 of the Orono Municipal Code during the next month and would appreciate your questions and comments. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: No action required. * > COUNCIL MEETING APR 1 2 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CilYOFOflONO DATE; April 9,1999 ITEM NO: ^ 3 Department Approval: ^ II Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Name: TomKuehn 1//1 / City Administrator's Title: Finance Director Iyj/^ Report Item Description: Investment Report for the Year Ended December 31,1998 Attachment: Investment Interest Earned compared to Revenue Budgets, 1998 The unaudited statement of earned interest for the year ended December 31,1998, reflects interest earned of $524,733 compared to budgeted amounts of $430,050, for a favorable variance of $94,683. This compares with $486,275 interest earned in 1997, and $468,905 in 1996. The average yield for the year was 5.84%, competed to 6.07% for 1997, and 6.19% in 1996, reflecting the continued downward trend in interest rates. The investment portfolio, at cost, on December 31, 1998, was $9,548,090, including $426,249 held by the Trustee for the H.R.A. bonds. This compares to a total investment portfolio, at cost, of $9,384,889, on December 31, 1997, and $8,341,492, on December 31, 1996. The increase in investments from December 31, 1997 to December 31, 1998 was primarily a result of the collection of special assessments levied for the 1997 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, which will begin principal payments in 1999. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Information item, no action required. TOM\.MS^MNV-RPT98 * ■' . if nil WII ;iTT! iltW«l •m! ■.•re iwim :ltli TO:COUNCIL FROM:MIKE GAFFRON DATE:4-12-99 SUBJECT:KING ’S COVE meetinq APR l 2 (Jyy This item was left off the agenda in error and will be added to the City Administrator's Report for discussion and action at tonight's meeting. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: April 7, 1999 Item No.: Department Approval: Adminbtrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gafiron Title: Senior Planning Coordinator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: King's Cove Marina, 1449 Shoreline Drive - Request for Temporary Above-Ground Gasoline Tank List of Exhibits A - King’s Cove Mechanical Permit Application B - System Description C - Site Map - Proposed Location ^ D - Code Section 9.34 - Fire Protection and Prevention Staff is in receipt of a permit request today from King's Cove Marina for a temporary above-ground gasoline storage tank. The intended use is to fuel new boats being sold at the property. We have not licensed King's Cove for fuel sales, although that is an allowed use in the B-2 zone. They don't intend to sell fuel to the public. Apparently the new boats for sale arrive at the site without fuel, and in the past King's Cove has fueled them directly from a tank truck, which can lead to a number of potential problems, such as spillage due to the limited ability to slow the flow from such trucks to a rate that can be used to fill vehicle tanks. Jon Mayer of Mayer Distributing in Long Lake is proposing a 560-gallon above-ground tank to be located in a parking stall next to the boat lift The tank is approximately 4' wide, 6' long and 4' high. It would be delivered in the spring and removed in the fall. There are a number of issues which staff has not yet had a chance to fully address, including: A below ground tank at least 75' from the lake would be allowed at this B-2 site, subject to meeting all Federal and State regulations. The proposed above-ground tank takes up a parking stall, or at least a portion of one; staffs recollection is that the marina has no excess stalls to give up; The Zoning Code doesn't allow structures or hardcover within 75' of the lake; Code Section 9.34 does not allow above-ground tanks in the B-2 Commercial District nor in any of our commercial districts, nor in some of our residential districts; King's Cove Fuel System April 7,1999 Page 2 Code section 9.34 would allow an underground tank or a diked above-ground tank as near as 30' to the lake (this seems to be in conflict with zoning code) Locating an above-ground tank at a location 75' from the lake would make it difficult to fuel new boats in the water. Hoses would have to be stretched across the parking lot, which would be hazardous and is not advisable. We need to determine whether it is feasible to have a temporary above-ground tank remote from the dispensing point using underground piping. Issues for Discussion/Further Investigation 1.Why does the Code disallow above-ground tanks in certain zones? Is this an aesthetic issue or is it for technical reasons due to safety or environmental concerns? Staff has not had a chance to review City files related to this code section. 2.Absent a code revision, staff would have to deny this request, as well as a recent proposal by Lakeside Marina to replace their underground tanks with an above-ground system. 3.In the King's Cove situation, continued fueling via tank trucks probably poses more environmental risks than an above-ground tank. Review Process Since the B-2 District standards require all building permits to be reviewed by Council, this request could be subject to the commercial site plan review process, even though it is applied for as a 'mechanical permit'. Council may refer this to Planning Commission, or may chouse to review it without Planning Commission input. The proposal as presented involves zoning code issues (Chapter 10), and variances may ultimately be required; there are also Fire Protection and Prevention issues (Chapter 9, Section 9.34) which are outside the scope of zoning. Given these issues, it may be most appropriate for this request to be referred to Planning Commission for review, and direct staff to review City policies regarding fuel systems. Input from the Fire Marshal would also be requested. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED 1. Refer this application to Planning Commission for Commercial Site Plan review. 2.Direct staff to investigate the issue of above-ground vs below-ground tanks for use in marina settings. 4 R!:G5iVSD h APR 0 7 1999 CITY OF ORONO Box 66 (2750 Kelley Parkway) Crystal Bay, MN 55323 APPLICATION FOR MEOHANICA£CE^tMrT 2. 3. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. You may apply for mechanical pennits by mail or in person at the City offices. Applications will be reviewed and a permit will be issued within 2 working days. * Permit cards will be sent by return mail after a review is completed. PERMITS ARE NOT VALID UNTIL YOU RECEIVE A PERMIT. WORK MUST NOT BEGIN UNTIL THE PERMIT CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB SITE. Mechanical Designs - Complete calculations, details and specifications are required for each heating, ventilation, hnmiHifif.arinnwit»hinntfiififfatin n, and air conditioning installation including heat loss/heat gain calculation, design tenqwratures, equipment ratings *"<1 identification as to type, manufacturer and model. Data shall be presented on form provided. Identification of and specifications for water heating equipment shall also be provided. When any new construction or remodeling is involved, a separate building permit must be obtained. All work must be done in accordance with the Uniform Mechanical Code/State Building Code requirements. All work must be inspected (tougb*in and final). Call 249*4600. 24>hour notice required. House Heating Test Record must be submined before final. 4. 5. 6. 7. ynstnictlons Cotrqilete all Items on rbl« implication. Compote the permit fee. Sign and date the certification. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. If you have questions, call 249-4600. Please check one:New Addition Repair Replace Residential XX Conunercial Zip; 55391JOB Sum; King's Cove 1449 shoreline Dr_____________ Owner’s Name; sig Rishoud_____________ Telephone Number; 612-437-6186 Mailing Address: 1449 shoreline Drive____City; wavzata Zip; 55391 ______ Contractor’s Name: Jon Maverf Lubes nnUmi hf>rtTdephone Number; 612-473-54 88 Mailing Address: p.o. box 624____________ City; wavzata Zip; 55391 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION HEATING SYSTEMS (^anti^: _ Make: Model: Fuel: Flue Size: Input BTUs: Output BTUs: see attached sheet for fhpi SyRt-.gm Dearson 560 Gasoline N/A N/A CFM: COOLING SYSTEMS Quantity: __ Make: __ Model: __ Tons: __ H. Power ^ a Si ^ ivim E-n DISTRIBUTING Diesel Fuel • Gasoline • Conunefcial Lubricants I Jon Mayer FAX: (612) 473-3045 Off: (612) 473-5466 1 1-800-622-7807 i WOOD BURNING EOUTPMFT^ ____ Wood stove with flue ____Wood combination or add-on ____Factory fireplace with flue ____Factory Fireplace (s)_____ Freestanding • ____ Wood Stove (s) ' .____ Masonry Franklin, other Brand Name Model No. Mfgr’s Min., Clearances, side rear min. flue dia. Y1CMJJ ATION No.____ No.____ No. Kitchen Exhaust ducted recirculating cfin Bath Exhaust (must be ducted outside) Other Fans: Locations cfin cfin FUEL STORAGE (MUST BE APPROVED BY FIRE MARSHAL) Temp X Installation ____ Removal ____ gallons ____ underground ____ ____ gallons Riel oil: LP Gas: inside outside XX Other Gasoline Tank - temporary Gas opening PERMIT FEE CALCULATION 1. 1.25% of Contract Price* or Minimum Fee ($35.00) X .0125 $ 2. (contract price) State Surcharge. *♦ Add the State Building Code Division Surcharge to each permit. ____________ * .0005 $ or $.50, whichever is greater (contract price) 3. 4. Postage and Handling (Only mail-in applications) TOTAL PERMIT FEE (Add lines 1-3 above) $ $ 1.50 ** CONTRACT PRICE or JOB COST means the actual or estimated dollar amount charged for the permitted work including materials, labor, profit, and other fixed costs. It is the amoimt to be charged to the customer for the wodc done. If any material, equipment, labor, or installation are furnished by the owner, tenant or any other party the reasonable market value of such items must be added to the estimated cost or contract price for permit fee purposes. In the event that there is a di^nite on the amount of the job cost, the City may request the submission of a signed copy of the actual contract. ** The STATE SURCHARGE is .0005 of the contract price under $1,0W,000 or $.50 - whichever is greater. For valuations over $1,(KX),000 call the Department of Inspectional Services for the price. The undersigned hereby applies to the City for issuance of a Mechanical Permit, agrees to do all work in strict accordance with the ordinances of the City and the regulations of the Minnesota State Building Code, and certifies that all statements made on this application arc complete, true and correct. Applicant’s Signature:Date: Approved By:Date: 1 j Mayer Distributing / Lubes Unlimited P,0, Box 358 Long Lake> MN. 55356 612-473-5488 612-473-3045 (fax) SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Gasoline Storage 1. Tank Size - 560 Gallons Double wall color - Red 2. Venting - Atmospheric.Fire Vent, Explosion 4 ” 3. Overfill System - Spill bucket style. 4. Pump System. Gasboy 72 ... “Not for Resale” 5. Hose with breakaway Fittings, Nozzle — Station style. S 6. Labeling -1203 Diamond Decals, Gasoline decals with Lubes Unlimited name and phone number. This tank will be temporary only April IS’*' 1999 to October 15* 1999. c ■J § 9.34 SBC. 9.34. FIRE PROTECTION AND PREVENTION. Subd. 1. Minnesota Uniform Fire Code Minnesota Uniform Fire Code, 1982 Edition - sai?Code shall as though set forth verbatim herein. One copy A ^h^ tl marked CITY OF ORONO - OFFICIAL COPY and kept on file in the olficf If the'^cYty Clerk and open to inspection and use by the public. Subd. 2. Fire Code Amendments. As Minnesota Uniform Fire Code, the following amendmen^^^ the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code are hereby adopted for the City. A. Restrictions on Flammable or Combustible Liquid Storage. Prohibited Districts Established. Pursuant to MUFC Sections 79.501 and 79.1001, the Council all land located within the following specified zoning districts to be the districts within which the storage ^ combustible liquids in aboveground tanks Pro ib g ' R-IB, RR-lB-1, RS, LR-IC, LR-lC-1, B-1, B-2, B-3, B 4, B 5, ~ o PRD. 2 Aboveground Tank Locations. In those dbtricts not included in Item 1 above, the storage of flammable or comb^ble liqui^ permitted provided such tanks are located in conformance with MUFC Sec and 79.1CX)1 , and with the following: (a) No such tank shaU be located in any required front yard space as defined in the Zoning Chapter. (b) No such tat* shall be located within 50 feet of any side or rear property lh« utJ^ it has a minimum one hour fire rati^. A tank with a min^ one hour to rating may be located within 30 feet of any side or rear property line. • (c) No such tank shaU be located within 75 feet wetland, stream or d^geway unless such tank is dtted jf Section 79.508. The minimum setback for a diked tank shall be 3 * wetland, stream or drainageway. ORDINANCT # 121 a 2ND SERIES September, 1993. ____ ORONO CC /(O', ifi-18 LH.- //> ^-\b 6>~(o i: f iAi> 219 (4-1-84) S 9.34 3. Underground Tank Locations. The storage of flammable or combustible liquids in underground tanks shall be permitted in any district in accordance with MUFC Section 79.601 and with the following: (a) No such tank shall be located under any required front yard space as defined in the Zoning Chapter. (b) No such tank shall be located within 10 feet of any side or rear property line. (c) No such tank shall be located within 30 feet of any lake, wetland, stream or drainageway. B. Restrictions on Liquified Petroleum Gas Storage. Pursuant to MUFC Section 82.105, the Council hereby declares all land within the City, except for land zoned I-Industrial, to be the district within which no liquified petroleum gas storage installa tion shall exceed 2,000 gallon water capacity for any one property; and the Council further declares that no liquified petroleum gas storage installation over 500 gallon water capacity shall be located in any required front, side, rear or lakeshore yard as defined in the Zoning Chapter, but shall conform to all setback requirements for principal buildings. C. Restrictions on Explosive and Blasting Agent Storage. Pursuant to MUFC Section 77.106(b), the Council hereby declares all land within the City to be the district in which storage of explosives and blasting agents is prohibited. Subd. 3. Definitions. Wherever the words or terms are used in this Section, the Fire. Code or the Fire Marshal Division alterations and amendments, they shall have the following meanings: A. "Building Official" means the person appointed by the Council to administer and enforce the State Building Code. ^ B. "Chief" means the Chief of the Fire Department which has contractual jurisdiction in each respective Fire Service District, or his authorized representative. C. "Corporation Counsel" means the Attorney for the City. t.D. "Jurisdiction or Municipality" means the City as a whole, and also that part of the City corresponding to each separate Fire Service District. Subd. 4. Enforcement. Authority for enforcement is hereby granted to and may be exercised by any or all or cne following persons: A. The Minnesota State Fire Marshal, or his authorized representative. ORONO CC 220 (4-1-84) COUNCIL MEETING APR 1 2 1999 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CUYOFORONO DATE: April 7. 1999 ITEM NO Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Title City Clerk Admioiflrator Reviewed: V/ Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval Attachments: Exhibit A - Description of ASID Showcase Home 1999 Preview Event Exliibit B - Description of ASID Showcase Home 1999 Tour SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT 1.Applicant: Event: Location: Date: Time: MSP Communications/Minneapolis St. Paul Magazine ASID (American Society of Interior Designers) Showcase Home 1999 Preview Event - Exhibit A 1535 Bohn's Point Road May 14, 1999 7:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. 2.Applicant: Event: MSP Communications/Minneapolis St. Paul Magazine ASID (American Society of Interior Designers) Showcase Home 1999 Tour - Exhibit B Location: Date: Time: 1535 Bohn's Point Road May 15 - June 6,1999 Saturdays Sundays Monday, May 31, Memorial Day Tuesdays & Wednesdays Thursdays & Fridays 10:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. 11:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. 11:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. 10:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. Noon-8:00 p.m. 3.Applicant: Event: Location: Date: Time: Minnetonka Bass Club Fishing Contest Departing from Maxwell Bay and North Arm Accesses June 5, 1999 6:30 a.m. - 7:30 a m. j L Request for Council Action continued Page 2 April 7, 1999 Licenses for Council Approval 4.Applicant: Event: Location: Date: Time: March for Parks Walk/Bike Departing from Orono City Hall to Bike Trail to Luce Line Trail east and west May 2, 1999 11:30 a.m. - 3:30 a.m. RESIDENTIAL KENNEL LICENSE 1.Carol G. Brooks 980 West Femdale Road 2.Tris Klohn 4455 North Shore Drive 3. John T. Redmona 2695 Casco Point Road COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. 1 A Showcase Home 1999 ASID Showcase Home 1999 Preview Event The Showcase Hone is a collaboration between Mr. Born, ASID (Ancrican Society of Interior Designers) and MPLS.ST.PAUL Magazine with a portion of the proceeds going to our charitable partner. The Junior League of Minnet^olis. This is the 3rd Annual Showcase Horae. Our first was held near Lake Harriet, and last )rear’s home was on Breezy Point Road in Deephaven. Each year we’ve thrown a special Preview Event to kick off the project and provide a sneak peak to a select group of people. It is an opportunity to raect and thank the many individuals that are a part of making the project a huge success. Our objective of the Preview is first and foremost to provide a preview of the home while creating a nice, comfortable environment for our guests to socialize and enjoy the surroundings. Following are the details as they pertain to the planning and execution of die event: Time: 7:00-11:00 p.m. Attendees: 500-700 dtroughout the evening Caterer: D’ \mico Catering All of the guests will be shuttled from the Wayzaca Bay Center. We will have approximately ten coaches that will transport all of the attendees from the Wayzata Bay Center in downtown Wayzata to the Bom residence. Mr. Clark Winslow, representing the neighbors around the private cul de sac area, has agreed to let our coaches turn around and head back to the Wayzata Bay Center for that evening only. Experience suggests that all of our attendees come and go in waves, however most of our attendees arrive by 9:30. We will have two Orono police officers that evening for traffic control: one at the intersection of 51 and Bohns Point Road and *ne at the driveway of Mr. Boras home. They will work in conjunction with the Managing Director and security to ensure a very smooth and safe transition. Since the majority of the designers do not want food or beverage in their rcspccUve areas we add a tent directly off of the patio on the south side of the home. A plan, layout and application is being presented to Mr. Lyle Omar for review. We will provide soda, water, beer and white wine to our guests at no charge and provide a small jazz trio in the tent that will not exceed the City ordinance decibel level. We have been presented with and will abide by all of the criteria under Section 5.25.-Shows and Large As'-mblies. Thank you for all of your help and guidance and we look forward to a fun and successful Preview Event. -I A Ml EXHTBIT 6 ASID — iQQo Showcase Home iyyy ASID Showcase Home 1999 Tour The Showcase Home is a collaboration between Mr. Bom, ASID (American Society of Interior Designers) and MPLS.ST.PAUL Magazine with a portion of the proceeds going to our charitable partner, The Junior League of Minneapolis. This is the 3rd Annual Showcase Home. Our first was held near Lake Harriet, and last year’s home was on Breezy Point Road in Deephaven. Following are the particular details pertaining to the project: Tour Dates and Hours: Saturday, May 15, through Sunday, June 6,1999 Saturdays Sundays Monday, May 31, Memorial Day Tuesdays and Wednesdays Thursdays and Fridays 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Noon to 8:00 p.m. Shuttles will be staged from the Wayzata Bay Center in downtown Wayzata and spaced accordingly as to not require any type of traffic control throughout the tour. Our experiences have shown that the number of attendees over the course of the day provides for a very well paced and comfortable experience. Per our numbers from ‘98 and the plan for *991 would anticipate approximately three shuttle trips per hour averaged over the duration of the tour. We will have limited on-street parking per the designated zones and will post/monitor the no parking zones. We will also have very limited parking at the home. Darren Ennis, the Managing Director, is on site each and every day and wired into the Wa3rzata Bay Center, shuttle coordinator, volunteer coordinator, front gale security and local law enforcement (if necessary) to ensure a very proactive and well orchestrated production. The Managing Director (as well as others on the committee) have been in contact with the neighborhood to inform, introduce and request that any/all questions, comments, concerns etc. be directed to the Managing Director for quick and concise closure. We respect the importance of the relations between the project, the homeowner and the neighborhood. Our commitment is to produce a successful tour for a great cause wlule not inconveniencing anyone in the process. Thank you for all of your help and guidance and we look forward to a fun and successful tour. > Date:April 2,1999 To:Lin Vee, City Clerk From:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Subject:Special Event Application - ASID Home •< I have met with Mr. Darren Ennis, the project coordinator for the ASID Open House at the Bom residence on Bohns Point Road. Prior concerns regarding traffic control have been addressed with the use of off-duty officers and use of shuttle buses. Providing all other conditions are met, I have no objection to the issuance of this permit. i ~ -3 7 (12) •1 • ••%* ^ .L !k‘' ^ . ■s:::^'yf Lj; : (20 m m • m • t 'A «/i UJ QC '*\ v*'V_aLiL— fjaw iiiJi I V 5^. 67 fippUt \ ' \ •% (14) ^ S Ni” 4i ) % »6 ^ > GOVT LOT I ; s& 05) 1 100 s•1 s «••?•_■ • 1 1 S 11 • r.^1 « \^r • icJ - ,1POINT•69• ^1 1 ^1 1dj8 (6) mI 1 r (7) • d hd r (8) Inj § ( 10> I (•) S ( < • ifUlk troTM r^ll^^TY Ml ron^’T ■■i^' -Tr^ ;-v "ffff ^Jll ‘ j^' oIMif!! 64 m Ku • V';‘v.t r'-'^i*i’^5^ iMji'tW-^ V; mMm4m m rj."I 'BliKP // -i- rjtzm Gi > WT.» ' illira »liiS .I^M W ilin'li&^ Sfe ii^.* Hffl Igti’.'s'^:!’^ s^us r ??■>»•m 4 ■V 4W.VX t^^”,A«55mTvx ijpi YjS Tivkisi^ \‘ - ./-Vf l:>wf->. f >>. ♦! ps^1 $■ • vl-,c .-^r 'f i^i^‘ v'k« A-.S. if >• CUY OF ORONO e 6124730MQ U>/yi/w u»;5i b’ oiiwj Kv.jji, / PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Permit #: Fee: #60.00 .1. Date Reeeived: filial Phone Number: laVZ• 6^A N.m.: N\5P Addr.u:_S Vfi ----------------------------------------------------- City.S1«t6.Zip • HK •_• •• *• •• •' Location of Parade or Event:________________----------------------------------------- 1^3^ •gottNS ?OIA/r Pi&/vi:>^ -0-53J Data of Event: HAV ■. Houra of Event:.. J? fH' '( P*3--------- Typaof Event: ^ Inaiiranee Company: FePgB/^C: I underatand aome avanta may raqvira off-duty or raaarva officer, end a fye may ba raquirad for thaaa aarvicaa. ------7^. _ iM$P Date Approved: □ Denied: □ By Remarks 'PaA^iaax- < • ! . I |i t I. ill• I • I • » I« CITY OP ORONO '7 Pirrnlt #: D.« R “i«d‘f x’c ^ ’. f'V Phone Number: M.^.. IA6F — Addr..e:.Z^_.‘5-J^;i^T.'^^- KB lS ■_ HlJ- 59^:^.V^iiy. •••r' J------!-------------------------- Uoeetion of Parede or Event: -------------- uIAVZATA ^^yig. JUNS (o_Hours of Event:..? HpjdS-'nx).?^. &------------------— //t/$0 <?/kibg .. Amount: I cea Ct mMUfmncm ^wru¥9^m»m —--------- I am aware of ell ‘PP'!®*^'* ®“‘Yeme**'l a^^^ ®'SSSr3-"K mm* __mm ^ understand soma events may requir. off-duty or r.sarva officers and a ft« mtv be required for these services. Pn ^ Sc -um -Ia ..................* — ........ ’ Dste Signature ^ I * Approved: C3 Denied: C! By Remarks:__ 0>«W< > >r11 hI . ■ ^li : ! • It • It ! 1 > r OiaAi J Date:April 6,1999 To:Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Subject: Special Event Application I have reviewed the application submitted by Larry Krohn on behalf of the Minnetonka Bass Club. I have no objection to the issuance of this permit providing the following conditions are met: 1. All parking will be restricted to the landing lots only. 2. No overnight parking will be allowed. S, ^ r R2CEJVSD 3 APR 0 5 1999 PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION Ui- ORO.VOCITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Permit #: Fee: $50.00 Date Received Phone Number: (p! d^SQ Name:____hy ________hoL : Address:]^'7o'? T S'/£1^/1 City,State,Zip:/^/*/dl~ A1_____^7 I am aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding parades and special events and will abide by same. I also agree to hold the City of Orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the parade of special event approved by the granting of this permit. I understand some events may require off-duty or reserve officers and a fee may be required for these services. Signature Date Approved: □ Remarks: Denied: □ Bv: 010396.3 mast r 4^ I Date:April 6,1999 To:Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Subject: Special Event Application I have reviewed the application submitted by Sherokee Use on behalf of the "March for Parks" event to be held on May 2,1999. I have no objection to the issuance of this permit providing the following conditions are met: 1. They must check the with Department of Natural Resources to see if there are any restrictions for use of the Luce Line Trail. 2. From the staging area crossing Hwy. 12, police assistance cannot be provided due to a marathon run on the same date and time. 4 I PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Permit #: Fee: S50.00 . M ^ V Date Received: \0 ^ Phone Number: 3.^)OM Name: \ Address:?^6?30 ^ City, State, Zb: Locauon of Parade or Event: ~/P {axUL U/vlTOfiii ux/j(r-_________ Date of Event: ^ ^ 5 ______Hours of Event: I 1 P *"S* 3^ Type of Event: KY\CLA(J^ *'fkv ^ Insurance Company:,Amount: (Copy of insurance certificate, on which the City, its agents and employees are named as additional insured, must be submitted with this application.) I am aware: of all i^plicable State and other laws regardmg parades and special events and will abide by same. 1 also agree to hold the City of Orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or mdirectly from the parade of special event approved by the granting of this permit. I understand some events may require off-duty or reserve officers and a fee may be equired for these services.aequirea lor mese services.^Ish Signature Date Approved: □Denied: D By: Remarks: i J KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1,19 to December 31.19^? Owner.Cl.A-(2-oL G. 6,/2.oo\c5 Property Address: Q % 0 ^ . 1~ £ fe.A) Q A b____^ ^ P-Q M O S ^ / (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different): __________________■ ___________;________. Phone: (home) ^(work). RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: S2S.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one tirrte: ^ (over 6 months of age) Principtd Breed: ^~ _______ Purpose for more than 2 dogs:F~^l^A(-£ lAAcC) 0 (O . tiiifc Dogs normally kept: inside____^kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name). (phone). Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permlsssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any. special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. • * KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Eflfective January 1,19___to December 31,19. Owner Property Address;.HHS'S* Oy~<gr>Q (mclude city and zip) Mailing Address Of dififerent):_____________________^_________ rAn. Cr3C>4 Phone: fliome) Sgoo (work)___ RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: 3 (over 6 months of age) PrincipjdBreed: , W^\K. Purpose for more than 2 docs: hccv-cp^«OK-7 Dogs normally kept: X inside____kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:_______________ Business Activities:. (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name). (phone) Dog nins'exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any C *y Ordinan-e or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any. special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. *>‘7 Applicant Date For City Use Only Kennel inspected by Recommends Appro'^^tf^ ^ Dat e ^c{ty of orono w 6124730510 C2/09/99 16:08 D> :02/04 N0:A37 3 0>wner KENNIL LICENSE APFUCATION I . Jtnuaw I 19 to December 31. 19 CM^ -7- Property Address: ro^io ^o>K4- 72^^ CTy^CTlri^ Include cl(include city end zip) Mailing Address (if different): ____________________________________ Phone: IhomeV • 11 fwortc^ ^ < RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany appUcatlon) Maximum No. of dogs to be kt^t at one time: (over 6 months of age) . Principal Breed:- Purpose for more than 2 dogs:_____flc/wR^ly^ Dogs normally kept; ____^inside. kennel structure . . • COMMEiRClAL Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Kama of Business:___________ Business Activities:.. Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name)__________ (phone)_________ Dog ttins/exercise areas are; ______^inside (example; boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) outside .both The undersigned hereby inskes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as •pectfied on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not -grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises prior to license appro^^l and at any other reasonable time duripg the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to ^abidc by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any. special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. Date For City Only Xenml irupecud by Ricommwnds Appro^f Dau TO 39V.J oil J:JW 5 3W3HC'nsciTq.-^qr.T'iT aT:/T p.cc.t'cn.'-o 9 Apr 1999 Pri 10:37 AM CherJc Register City of Orono Check Humber Date Name Check Humber 58025 58025 BEST BUY COMPAHY 05-Apr-99 BEST BUY COMPANY Totals Check Number 58025 BEST BUY COMPANY Check Number 58026 DCA 58026 05-Apr-99 DCA Totals Check Number 58026 DCA Check Humber 58029 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 58029 58029 58029 05-Apr-99 05-Apr-99 05-Apr-99 MN DEPT OF REVENUE MN DEPT OP REVENUE hd dept OF REVENUE Totals Check Number 58029 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Check Number 58030 POST BOARD 58030 05-Apr-99 POST BOARD Totals Check Number 58030 POST BOARD Check Number 58031 DEPUTY REGISTRAR 58031 05-Apr-99 DEPUTY REGISTRAR Totals Check Number 58031 DEPUTY REGISTRAR Check Number 58147 DCA 58147 05-Apr-99 DCA Totals Check Number 58147 DCA Check Number 58482 HANSEN, STEVEN C. 58482 05-Apr-99 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 58482 HANSEN, STEVSI C. Check Humber 58500 MN DEPT OP REVENUE Va500 58500 05-Apr-99 05-Apr-99 MN DEPT OP REVENUE MN DEPT OF REVENUE Totals Check Number 58500 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Grand Total Transaction Amount 127.79 127.79 491.37 491.37 3.00 577.00 6.00 586.00 90.00 90.00 13.00 13.00 250.26 250.26 -116.95 -116.95 -3.00 -6.00 -9.00 1,432.47 Comments iPR f 2 )»y CITYOFOho/»^ T^/VCR - POLICE TRNING SPENDING ACCOUNTS FEBRUARY SALES TAX FEBRUARY SALES TAX FEBRUARY SALES TAX LICENSE - J JOHNSON TABS - NEW SQUAD SPENDING ACCT 3/24/99 VOID CHK 58482 VOID CK 858500 VOID CK 858500 4 4. 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10:30 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 58559 50559 A-I RENTAL 06-Apr-99 A-1 RENTAL Totals Check Number 58559 A-1 RENTAL Check Number 58560 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS 58560 58560 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS Totals Check Number 58560 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS Check Number 58561 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 58561 06-Apr-99 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE Totals Check Number 58561 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE Check Number 58562 ALL STAR ELECTRIC 58562 08-Apr-99 ALL STAR ELECTRIC Totals Check Number 58562 ALL STAR ELECTRIC Check Number 5B563 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC. 58563 06-Apr-99 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC Totals Check Number 58563 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC Check Number 58564 ASPLUNDH COFFEE 58564 58564 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 ASPLUNDH COFFEE ASPLUNDH COFFEE Totals Check Number 58564 ASPLUNDH COFFEE Check Number 58>^65 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ 58565 58565 58565 58565 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 03-Apr-98 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ AT St T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ Totals Check Number 58565 AT St T WIRELESS SERVICES/AZ Check Number 50566 ATS.T - KC 58566 O0-Apr-99 ATSiT - KC Totals Check Number 58566 ATSiT - KC Check Number 58567 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF Transaction Amount 40.50 40.50 352.43 330.15 682.58 394.89 394.89 583.78 583.78 55.00 55.00 152.00 12.00 164.00 9.46 9.45 159.39 33.23 211.53 34.20 34.20 Page 1 Comments PUMP - CTY RD 15 BREAK SECURITY SVC 4/1/99-00 SECURITY SVC 4/1/99-00 CELL PHONES TRFC SGNL OCBR ZONING NEWS SUBSCRIPTION COFFEE CREAM CELL PHONES CELL PHONES CELL PHONES WECKMAN TAX, FEDERAL ACCESS CHGS 2mmi 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10:30 AM Check Number Check Number 58567 Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Date Name 58567 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF 06-Apr-99 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF Totals Check Number 58567 AUGIES MOBILE CHEF Check Number 58568 Totals Check Number 58568 BCA/TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 08-Apr-99 BCA/TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 58568 BCA/TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT Check Number 58569 BLACKOWIAK & SON Check Number 58571 58571 CHAMPION AUTO STORES 08-Apr-99 Totals Check Number CHAMPION AUTO STORES 58571 CHAMPION AUTO STORES Check Number 58573 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 58573 06-Apr-99 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Totals Check Number 58573 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Check Number 58574 CITY OF LONG LAKE Transaction Amount 83.68 83.68 80.00 80.00 2.12 2.12 Comments HOT DOG, CHEESEBRGRS MOTIVAT LDRSHIP-MOROCZYNS 58569 C6-Apr-99 BLACKOWIAK & SON 78.90 WASTE SRVC 3/99 58569 06-Apr-99 BLACKOWIAK & SON 191.72 WASTE SRVC 3/99 Totals Check Number 58569 BLACKOWIAK & SON 270.62 Check Number 58570 BUDGET PRINTING 58570 06-Apr-99 BUDGET PRINTING 55.70 REPORT 58570 06-Apr-99 BUDGET PRINTING 7.48 SHIPPING 58570 OC-Apr-99 BUDGET PRINTING 69.31 CLASP ENVELOPES 58570 08-Apr-99 BUDGET PRINTING 8.27 SHIPPING ' 58570 08-Apr-99 BUDGET PRINTING 5.54 ENGRAVED PLATE 58570 08-Apr-99 BUDGET PRINTING 102.50 POLICE REPORT FORMS Totals Check Number 58570 BUDGET PRINTING 248.80 MISC SUPPLIES 172.80 OIL, TIE ROD END 182 144.41 BATTERY 175 31.25 REMOVE CAGE 175 246.00 BRAKES 180 32.21 OIL CHANGE 176 87.50 REATTACH SPLACH[ SHLF 179 44.71 OIL, LIGHT BAR WIRE 181 62.50 DIAGNOSTICS 66.94 THROTTLE, FUEL INJ CLN178 240.45 OIL CHG, REAR BRAKE 180 32.72 OIL CHG 8177 58.91 OIL CHG, TIRES 8182 32.21 OIL CHANGE 1,252.61 9 Apr 1999 pri 10:30 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 58574 58574 CITY OP LONG LAKE 08-Apr-99 CITY OF LONG LAKE Totals Check Number 58574 CITY OF LONG LAKE Check Number 58575 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 58575 08-Apr-99 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH Totals Check Number 58575 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH Check Number 58576 CITYVIEW PLUMBING k HEATING 58576 06-Apr-99 CITYVIEW PLUMBING k HEATING Totals Check Number 58576 CITYVIEW PLUMBING k HEATING Check Number 58577 CON-MIX 58577 08-Apr-99 CON-MIX Totals Check Number 58577 CON-MIX Check Number 58578 CYS UNIFORMS 58578 58578 58578 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 CYS UNIFORMS CYS UNIFORMS CYS UNIFORMS Totals Check Number 58578 CYS UNIFORMS Check Number 58579 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 58579 06-Apr-99 CAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Totals Check Number 58579 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Check Number 58580 DCA 58580 58580 08-Apr-99 06-Apr-9r DCA DCA Totals Check Number 58580 DCA Check Number 58581 DE BAERE, DON 58581 08-Apr-99 DE BAERE« DON Totals Check Number 58581 DE BAERE« DON Check Number 58582 DELTA DENTAL 58582 06-Apr-99 DELTA DENTAL Totals Check Number 5C582 DELTA DENTAL Transaction Amount 223.36 123.36 200.00 200.00 82.76 82.76 370.13 370.13 6.34 17.50 238.70 262.54 102.40 102.40 389.29 142.80 532.09 20.66 20.66 858.15 858.15 Page 3 Comments BALANCE-5" FIRE HOSE 1999 GOLF CHANGE FUND REPAIRS-MENS ROOM NAVARRE SIDEWALK RPRS NAME TAG JACKET EMBLEMS-HOESCHET UNIFORM - JOHNSON BEER FOR RESALE SPEND ACCT-PP END 4/4/99 DCA ADM FEE 3/99 PRK k MILEAGE - SEMINAR DENTAL PREMIUM 4/99 J 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10x30 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number Check Number 58582 DELTA DENTAL 58583 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP S8583 08-Apr-99 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP Totals Check Number 58583 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP Check Number 58584 DEPT OP ADMINISTRATION 58584 06-Apr-99 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION Totals Check Number 58584 DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION Check Number 58585 DEPUTY REGISTRAR 58585 06-Apr-99 DEPUTY REGISTRAR Totals Check Number 58585 DEPUTY REGISTRAR Check Number 58586 DOTZENROTH« DAVID 58586 08-Apr-99 DOTZENROTH, DAVID Totals Check Number 53586 DOTZENROTK, DAVID Check Number 58587 E-Z RECYCLING 58587 06-Apr-99 E-Z RECYCLING Tociils Check Number 58587 E-Z RECYCLING Check Number 58588 E.S.G. COMPANY INC. 58588 06-Apr-99 E.S.G. COMPANY INC Totals Check Number 58588 E.S.G. COMPANY INC Check Number 58589 BARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC. 58589 08-Apr-99 BARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC. Totals Check Number 58589 EARL F. ANDERSON k ASSOC. Check Number 58590 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 58590 06-Apr-99 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Totals Check Number 58590 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Check Number 58591 ESS BROTHERS k SONS 58591 06-Apr-99 ESS BROTHERS k SONS Totals Check Number 58591 ESS BROTHERS k SONS Transaction Amount 85.10 85.10 261.59 261.59 27.00 27.00 116.00 116.00 5,697.72 5,697.72 84.50 84.50 555.71 555.71 166.75 166.75 104.37 104.37 Page 4 Comments LD PHONE CHARGES MICROFILM - STREET FILES TABS - NEW SQUAD INS DEDUCTIBLE 2/16/99 RECEYCLING 3/99 BLADES SHARPENED SIGNS - PARK PROPERTY BBBR FOR RESALE VALVES I I i 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10:30 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number Check Number 58591 ESS BROTHERS & SONS 50592 EXPRESS MESSENGER 58592 58592 08-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 EXPRESS MESSENGER EXPRESS MESSENGER Totals Check Number 58592 EXPRESS MESSENGER Check Number 58593 FEDEX 58593 56593 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 FEDEX FEDEX Totals Check Number 58593 FEDEX Check Number 58594 FINANCE DEPARTMENT - AC 50594 O0-Apr-99 FINANCE DEPARTMENT - AC Totals Check Number 58594 FINANCE DEPARTMENT - AC Check Number 58595 FIRSTAR TRUST CO.. 58595 08-Apr-99 FIRSTAR TRUST CO.. Totals Check Number 58595 FIRSTAR TRUST CO.. Check Number 58596 FORTIS BENEFITS 58596 06-Apr-99 FORTIS BENEFITS Totals Check Number 58596 FORTIS BENEFITS Check Number 58597 FRONTIER ELECTRIC COMPANY 50597 06-Apr-99 FRONTIER ELECTRIC COMPANY Totals Check Number 58597 FRONTIER ELECTRIC COMPANY Transaction Amount 42.00 46.87 88.87 18.43 16.47 34.90 280.00 280.00 118.35 118.35 763.74 763.74 166.50 166.50 Page 5 Comments DEL TO CHADWICK DELIVERY FEES COUCIL PKT - FLINT COUCIL PKT - FLINT LMC ANN CONF-PETERSON FINAL-82 BOND-AGENT FEB LTD PREMIUM 4/99 CHANGE LIGHTS Check Number 58598 58598 G a K 06-Apr-99 SERVICES G a K SERVICES 8.52 UNIFORM - STEFFHAGEN 58598 06-Apr-99 G a K SERVICES 86.44 MATS - PW 58598 00-Apr-99 a K SERVICES 42.01 MATS - COLNCIL CHBRS 58598 O0-Apr-99 G a K SERVICES 42.01 MATS - ADMIN 58598 06-Apr-99 G a K SERVICES 76.64 UNIFORMS 58598 06-Apr-99 G a K SERVICES 15.73 UNIFORM - RATHBUN 58590 06-Apr-99 G a K SERVICES 55.11 MATS - PD 58590 06-’or-99 G a K SERVICES 8.52 UNIFORM - STEFFHAGEN 58590 06-Apr-99 G a K SERVICES 109.71 UNIFORMS 58598 06-Apr-99 G a K SERVICES 15.73 UNIFORM - RATHBUN J 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10:30 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 6 Check Number Date Name Check Number 58598 58598 G & K SERVICES C6-Apr-99 G & K SERVICES Totals Check Number 58598 G & K SERVICES Check Number 58599 GAPPA, GREG 58599 06-Apr-99 GAPPA, GREG Totals Check Number 58599 GAPPA, GREG Check Number 58600 GATEWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS Totals Check Number 58603 GHT CONSTRUCnON, INC Check Number 58604 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE 58604 06-Arr-99 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE Totals Check Number 58604 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE Check Number 58605 GRAFIX SHOPPE 58605 08-Apr-99 GRAFIX SHOPPE Totals Check Number 58605 GRAFIX SKJPPE Check Number 58606 GRAND CASINO MILLE LACS Transaction Amount 224.86 687.28 146.75 146.75 36,601.33 99.00 99 00 475.50 475.^0 Comments UNIFORM - RATHBUN MILEAGE REIMBURSE24ENT 58600 06-Apr-99 GATEWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS 389.68 FLARES Totals Check Number 58600 GATEWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS 389.68 Check Number 58602 GENUINE PARTS CO. 58602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.2.78 SHOP SUPPLIES 58602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.1.79 LAMP 58602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.18.13 PLUG, TUBING 58602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.50.31 FUEL FILTER, LIGHT 58602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.10.48 PS FLUID 58602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.3.73 BOTTLE • 3602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.5.31 SHOP SUPPLIES 58602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.79.88 SHOP SUPPLIES 58602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.1.92 CONNECTRS 59602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.29.20 SWITCHES, LIGHT 58602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.59.93 WKR LMP, LIGHTS, SWTCH 58602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.0.77 COTTER PIN 58602 08-Apr-99 GENUINE PARTS CO.21.26 SHOP SUPPLIES Totals Check Number 58602 GENUINE PARTS CO.285.49 Check Number 58603 GHT CONSTRUCTION,INC 58603 06-Apr-99 GHT CONSTRUCTION, INC 36,601.33 RFP 82 LS 13 REHAB ADV ZONING APPLIC - KAHN SQUAD KITS - NEW SQUADS i i 1 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10:30 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 7 Check Number Date Name Check Number 58606 58606 GRAND CASINO MILLE LACS 08-Apr-99 GRAND CASINO MILLE LACS Totals Cneck Number 58606 GRAND CASINO MILLE LACS Check Number 50607 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER 50607 06-Apr-99 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER Totals Check Number 58607 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER Check Number 58608 KANSEN« STEVEN C. 58608 18-Mar-99 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 58608 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Check Number 58609 HASEMAN, CAROLE 58609 06-Apr-99 HASEMAN, CAROLE Totals Check Number 58609 HASEMAN, CAROLE Check Number 58610 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE 58610 Oe-Apr-99 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE Totals Check Number 58610 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE Check Number 58611 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Transaction Amount 38.22 38.22 20.41 20.41 100.00 100.00 11.93 11.93 196.87 196.87 Comments LODGING MALEFI-B JOHNSON SIGN SUPPLIES STEEL TOE BOOTS PRKING, MILEAGE PRMT MTG GRASS SEED - 125# 58611 08-Apr-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 15.50 MIC REPAIR 58611 06-Apr-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 521.59 JAIL CHGS 2/99 Totals Check Number 58611 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 537.09 Check Number 58612 HENNEPIN <COUNTY TREAS. 58612 06-Apr-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.32.50 MAILING LST-ORONO ORCH SU 58612 08-Apr-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.10.60 SPEC ASSMNT SERV CHARG 58612 08-Apr-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.10.60 SPEC ASSMNT SERV CHARG 58612 08-Apr-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.274.50 SPEC ASSMNT SERV CHARG 58612 08-Apr-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.856.50 SPEC ASSMNT SERV CHARG 58612 08-Apr-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.21.00 SPEC ASSMNT SERV CHARG 58612 O0-Apr-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.94.50 SPEC ASSMNT SERV CHARG Totals Check Number 58612 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.1,300.20 Check Number 58613 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER -GEN 58613 06-Apr-99 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN 1,054.92 RM k BORAD 2/99 Totals Check Number 58613 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN 1,054.92 i i \ 9 Apr 1999 Check Register Page Frl 10:30 AM City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 58614 HINSHAW A CULBERTSON 58614 08-Apr-99 HINSHAH fc CULBERTSON 263.72 WOODHILL CC-ROAO MATTER 58614 08-Apr-99 HINSKAH & CULBERTSON 121.00 SAGA HILL LAND PURCH 58614 08-Apr-99 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON 825.00 BROOK PARK REALTY S8614 08-Apr-99 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON 1,100.00 LEGAL SERVICE - FEB 58614 08-Apr-S:»HINSHAW & CULBERTSON 422.00 LEGAL SERVICE 2/99 58614 08-^r-99 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON 40.00 GORDON NELSON MATTER 58614 08-Apr-99 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 4,677.06 LEGAL APPLIC - FEB Totals Check Number 58614 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON 7,448.78 Check Number 58615 XNFRATECH 58615 06-Apr-99 INFRATECK 3,551.73 TELEVISE SWR - Ikl PROJ 58615 06-JMP>^-99 INFRATF.CH 2,404.23 TELEVISE SWR - ISI PROJ Totals Check Number 58615 INFRATECH 5,955.96 Check Number 58616 JON WRIGHT 58616 06-Apr-99 JON WRIGHT 291.38 FRAMT.NG - GC PAINTING Totals Check Number 58616 JON WRIGHT 291..38 Check Number 58617 KENNETH N.. POTTS, PA 58617 06-Apr-99 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA 2,291.66 PROSECUTIONS 3/99 Totals Check Number 58617 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA 2,291.66 Check Number 58618 KNOLLENBERG, KRIS 58618 06-Apr-99 KNOLLENBERG. KRIS 17.49 MILEAGE-SEMINAR Totals Check Number 58618 KNOLLENBERG, KRIS 17.49 Check Number 58619 LAKE MTK\CONSERVATION DIST. 58619 06-Apr-99 LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DIST.13,230.70 1ST k 2ND QUARTER Totals Check Number 58619 LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DIST.23,230.70 Check Number 58620 LEAGUE OP MN CITIES INS. TRUST 58620 08-Apr-99 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS. TRUST 2,100.00 1998 WORK COMP AUDIT Totals Check Number 58620 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS. TRUST 2,100.00 Check Number 53621 LOGIS 58621 08-Apr-99 LOGIS 958.34 PIMS DATA PROC FEB TocaXs Check Number 58621 LOGIS 958.34 ■I 9 J^r 1999 Pri 10:30 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 58622 58622 58622 58622 58622 LONG LAKS BIG A AUTO PARTS 08-Apr-99 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 08-Apr-99 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 08-Apr-99 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 08-Apr-99 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS Totals Check Number 58622 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS Check Number 58623 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT 58623 58623 58623 58623 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 58623 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT Check Number 58624 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 58624 58624 58624 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 53624 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Check Number 58625 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 58625 58625 58625 08-Apr-99 08-Apr-99 08-Apr-99 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 58625 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT Che(.k Number 58626 MALEFI 58626 08-Apr-99 MALEFI Totals Check Number 58626 MALEFI Check Number 58627 MEDICA CHOICE 58627 58627 58627 50627 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA CHOICE MEDICA HOICE Totals Check Number 58627 MEDICA CHOICE Check Lumber 58628 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 58628 58628 08-Apr-99 08-Apr-S9 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Totals Check Number 58628 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Transaction Amount 6.98 16.01 18.97 13.63 55.59 16.57 -52.08 16.34 77.77 58.60 9.80 7.77 18.96 36.53 57.53 197.03 64.63 319.19 90.00 90.00 1,317.74 178.55 178.56 16,022.79 17,697.64 -605.25 1,867.00 1,261.75 Page 9 Comments COUPLER, BUSHING CASTER WHLS CASTER WHLS, DOME UNVSL DOME FILES RETURN-HANDLE BAR, SCREW NEEDLE CAGE SAFETY CHAIN, SCREW MISC HARDWARE LINK SEAFOAM, TRANS TUNE ’i: EXCHANGE-BUBBLE WINDOW BUBBLE WINDOW CO” CABLE MALEFI SPRG CONF-JOHNSON HEALTH PREM 4/99 HEALTH PREM 4/99 HEALTH PREM 4/99 HEALTH PREM 1/99 CREDIT ON ACCOUNT SOFT DRINKS FOR RESALE tiiucsTK r 9 Apr 1999 fri 10:30 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 58629 58629 MINN COMM 06-Apr-99 MINN COm Totals Check Number 58629 MINN COMM Check Number 58630 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 58630 58630 08-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY MINJIEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Totals Check Number 58630 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Check Number 58631 MINNEGASCO 58631 59631 58631 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO Totals Check Number 58631 MINNEGASCO Check Number 58632 MN DEPT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY 58632 06-Apr-99 MN DEPT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY Totals Check Number 58632 MN DEPT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY Check Number 58633 MN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 58633 06-Apr-99 MN PLANNING ASSOCIATION Totals Check Number 58633 MN PLANNING ASSOCIATION Check Number 58634 MN POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM 58634 06-Apr-99 POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM Totals Check Number 58634 MN POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM Check Number 58635 MN WEIGHTS k MEASURES 58635 06-Apr-99 MN WEIGHTS k MEASURES Totals Check Number 58635 MN WEIGHTS k MEASURES Check Number 58636 MOROWCZYNSKI, JIM 58636 06-Apr-99 M0R0WC2YNSKI. JIM Totals Check Number 58636 MOROWCZYNSKI, JIM Check Number 58637 MTI DIST CO. 58637 06-Apr-99 MTI DIST CO Tctals Check Number 50637 MTI DIST CO Transaction Amount 4.34 4.34 27.00 13.50 40.50 29.93 247.56 1,668.81 1,946.30 75.28 75.28 75.00 75.00 109.09 109.09 200.00 200.00 13.81 13.81 46.97 46.97 Page 10 Comments TX k FED ACCESS CHG-PAGER ACETYLENE, OXYGEN MEDICAL OXYGEN GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE UC - JOHN ROSS CITY MEMBERSHIP LEGAL EXPENSE ASSESSMENT SCALE CALIBRATION MEALS - BCA TRAINING STD CUP 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10:30 AM Check Number Date Name Check Number 58637 MTI DIST CO. Check Number 58640 NAVARRE HARDWARE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640•08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE 58640 08-Apr-99 NAVARRE Totals Check Number 58640 NAVARRE Check Number 58641 NCPERS GROUP LIFE 58641 06-Apr-99 NCPERS 1 Totals Check Number 58641 NCPERS i Check Number 58642 NSP 58642 09-Jun-98 NSP 58642 29-Dec-98 NSP 58642 C8-Jan-99 NSP 58642 29-Dec>98 NSP 58642 29-Dec-98 NSP 58642 29-Dec-98 NSP 58642 08-Apr-99 NSP Totals Check Number 58642 NSP Check Register City of Orono Page 11 HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE Check Number 58643 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT 58643 08-Apr-99 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT Transaction Amount 120.00 120.00 Totals Check Number 58643 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT 100.00 100.00 Comments 27.68 DIGGER 20.42 HISC SUPPLIES 10.12 DRAIN COVER 5.30 GRASS SEED 1.44 MISC SUPPLIES 7.99 BULK BOLTS 1.91 PANEL NAILS 73.73 PADLOCKS, SOAP 2.65 SPRAY ENAMEL 40.53 MISC SUPPLIES 28.69 PLIER, ST ATLAS 3.18 BATTERY 14.24 FLD LIGHT, BATTERY 41.48 ENAMIL 0.64 BULK WASHERS 55.18 PAINTING SUPPLIES 16.90 MISC SUPPLIES 20.18 MAG HOOK, FRAME 10.85 PLIER 13.25 SEALANT, WIRE 46.84 BATTERY, TAPE, BUL 19.32 SHOP SUPPLIES 9.32 MISC SUPPLES 3.93 BRASHES, SPONGE 49.16 PAINTING SUPPLIES 524.93 PERA LIFE - 4/99 1,191.65 STREET LIGHTING 4/98 139.82 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 183.55 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 1,275.36 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 779.21 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 1,883.19 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 5.69 5,458.47 ELECTRICAL SERVICE SAFETY BOOTS ! • 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10:30 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 12 Check Number Check Number Check Number Date Name 58643 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT 58644 OFFICE DEPOT Check Number 58648 PIONEER 58648 58648 58648 58648 58648 58648 58648 06-Apr>99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER Totals Check Number 58648 PIONEER Check Number 58649 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. 58649 06-Apr-99 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC Totals Check Number 58649 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC Check Number 58650 PROTECTION ONE 58650 06-Apr-99 PROTECTION ONE Totals Check Number 58650 PROTECTION ONE Transaction Amount 21.57 32.36 100.66 19.78 64.71 170.77 341.53 751.38 1,752.48 1,752.48 163.99 163.99 Comments 58644 06-Apr-99 OFFICE DEPOT 516.67 CALCULATOR 58644 06-Apr-99 OFFICE DEPOT -9.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 58644 06-Apr-99 OFFICE DEPOT 28.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 58644 06-Apr-99 OFFICE DEPOT -36.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 58644 06-Apr-99 OFFICE DEPOT 131.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES Totals Check Number 58644 OFFICE DEPOT 629.89 Check Number 58645 OFFICE ENVIROMENT BROKERS 58645 06-Apr-99 OFFICE ENVIROMENT BROKERS 1,240.73 FILES,TABLE - . Totals Check Number 58645 OFFICE ENVIROMENT BROKERS 1,240.73 Check Number 58646 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC. 58646 06-Apr-99 OLD DUTCH POODS IKC.21.00 CHIPS Totals Check Number 58646 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.21.00 Check Number 58647 OMAN, LYLE 58647 06-Apr-99 OMAN,LYLE 46.86 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 50647 06-Apr-99 OMAN,LYLE 30.36 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 58647 06-Apr-99 OMAN,LYLE 33.99 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT Totals Check Number 58647 OMAN,LYLE 111.21 LAND USE APPLICATION 2467 LAND USB APPLICATIONS ASSESSMNT NOT ORONO ORCH ON SALE LICENSE APPL ORO 8184 ORD 8183 ORD 8185 JANITORIAL SRVe 3/99 MONITORING 4/1/99-6/30/99 1 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10:30 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Humber Date Name Check Number Check Humber 58650 PROTECTION ONE 58551 REED VENDING 58651 06-Apr-99 REED VENDING Totals Check Number 58651 RFED VENDING Check Humber 58652 RUTTGER'S BAY LAKE LODGE 58652 C8-Apr-99 RUTTGER'S BAY LAKE LODGE Totals Check Number 58652 RUTTGER'S BAY LAKE LODGE Check Humber 58653 S-? TESTING. INC 58653 08-Aor-99 S-P TESTING. INC Totals Check Humber 58653 S-P TESTING. INC Check Humber 58654 SCHARBER & SONS 58654 08-Apr-99 SCHARBER & SONS Totals Check Number 58654 SCHARBER a SONS Check Number 58055 SHANK CONSTRUCTORS 58655 06-Apr-99 SHANK CONSTRUCTORS Totals Check Humber 58655 SHANK CONSTRUCTORS Check Number 58656 SNYDER DRUG STORES 58656 58656 58656 58656 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 SNYDER DRUG STORES SNYDER DRUG STORES SNYDER DRUG STORES SNYDER DRUG STORES Totals Check Number 58656 SNYDER DRUG STORES Check Number 58657 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC. 58657 06-Apr-99 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Totals Check Number 58657 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Check Number 58658 ST. JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC. 58658 06-Apr-99 ST. JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC Totals Check Number 58658 ST. JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC Check Number 58659 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH Transaction Amount 187.50 187.50 257.20 257.20 1.250.00 1.25C.00 17.74 17.74 135.657.00 135.657.00 1.12 28.73 86.13 5.53 121.51 780.00 780.00 84.65 84.65 Page 13 Comments CANDY FOR RESAJ.B LODGING MPHA CONF-QAPPA SEPTIC TSTING-HWY 12 PROP BLADE RFP 86 - HAV WTR REHAB FILM POLAROID FILM FILM. BATTERIES MISC SUPPLIES T.H. 12 RELOCATION-PHS 2 BULBS 9 I I 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10i30 AM Check Number Check Number 53659 Check Regiater City of Orono Page 14 Date Name 58659 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH 06-Apr-99 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH To:.al8 Check Number 50659 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITH Check Number 58660 STEFFENHAGEN, RON 58660 O0-Apr-99 STEFFiNHAGEN, RON Totals Check Number 58660 STEFFENHAGEN, RON Check Number 53661 STOP STICK LTD 58661 06-Apr-99 STOP STICK LTD Totals Check Number 50661 STOP STICK LTD Tot/ils Check Number 50665 THE HOME DEPOT Transaction Amount 74.73 74.73 109.97 189.97 7.00 7.00 Comments FRONT DOOR KEYS GOLF BALLS REPLACEMENT-STP STCK Check Number 50662 STREICHERS 58662 06-Apr-99 STREICHERS 114.17 HOLSTER 58662 06-Apr-99 STREICHERS 32.52 CHARGER ASSEMBLY 58662 06-Apr-99 STREICHERS 90.21 MACE. LIGHT. HOLDER 58662 06-Apr-99 STREICHERS 44.95 TROUSERS 58662 06-Apr-99 STREICHERS 42.95 TROUSERS. BELT 58662 06-Apr-99 STREICHERS 142.85 TROUSERS. BELT. BOOTS 58662 06-Apr-99 STREICHERS 11.35 HALOGEN BULB 58662 06-Apr-99 STREICHERS 33.97 KEY CUFFS 58662 06-Apr-99 STREICHERS 24.44 DRUG TEST KITS Totals Check Number 58662 STREICHERS 537.41 Check Number 58663 SUBURBAN TIRE INC. 58663 06-Apr-99 SUBURBAN TIRE INC.558.23 TIRES Totals Check Number 58663 SUBURBAN TIRE INC.558.23 Check Number 58664 SUPERIOR FORD 58664 06-Apr-99 SUPERIOR FORD 21.064.00 99 CROWN VIC - SQD 184 58664 06-A* r-99 SUPERIOR FORD 21.064.00 99 CROWN VIC - SQD 103 58664 O0-Apr-99 SUPERIOR FORD 21.064.00 99 CROWN VIC SQD 8185 Totals Check Number 58664 SUPERIOR FORD 63,192.00 Check Number 58665 THE HOME DEPOT 58665 08-Apr-99 THE HOME DEPOT 81.20 STAKES - HACKBERRY PARK 58665 06-Apr-99 THE HOME DEPOT 284.36 STORM DOOR 58665 O0-Apr-99 THE HOME DEPOT 204.38 DRILL, DRILL BITS 58665 06-Apr-99 THE HOME DEPOT 50.06 CORNER GAURDS 620.00 i ^ 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10:30 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 5866f 58666 THE SIGN AGE 06-Apr-99 THE SIGN AGE Totals Check Number 58666 THE SIGN AGE Check Number 58667 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 58667 08-Apr-99 TOLL GAS L WELDING SUPPLY Totals Check Number 58667 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY Check Number 58668 TRACY TRIPP FUELS 58668 06-Apr-99 TRACY TRIPP FUELS Totals Check Number 58668 TRACY TRIPP FUELS Check Number 58669 TRI STATE PUMP 58669 06-Apr-99 TRI STATE PUMP Totals Check Number 58669 TRI STATE POMP Check Number 58670 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 58670 58670 58670 58670 08-Apr-99 08-Apr-99 08-Apr-99 08-Apr-99 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Totals Check Number 58670 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Check Number 58671 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 58671 08-Apr-99 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 58671 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Check Number 58672 UNIV OF MINNESOTA S8672 08-Apr i9 UNIV ijf MINNESOTA Totals Check Number 58672 UNIV OF MINNESOTA Check Number 58673 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE 58673 58673 08-Apr-99 08-Apr-99 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE UNUM LIFE INSURANCE LIFE LIFE Totals Check Number 58673 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LIFE Check Number 58674 US WEST - SECURITY DEPT 58674 06-Apr-99 US WEST - SECURITY DEPT Transaction Amount 26.63 26.63 5.89 5.89 2,444.56 2,444.56 617.95 617.95 143.73 91.30 39.15 83.65 317.83 900.00 900.00 115.00 115.00 403.30 85.65 488.95 1.80 Page 15 Comments DECAL CYLINDER CHARGES 2663.5 GALS UNLEADED REPAIRS - GS #5 TROUSERS,SHIRT,BELT-FISCH TROUSERS - HAGEN TROUSERS - TOMCZYK TROUSERS-EWALD POSTAGE FOR METER i % MPWA SPRING CONF-QAPPA LIFE PREMIUM 4/99 AD&D PREMIUM 4/99 liti 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10:30 AM Check Number Date Name Check Register City of Orono Transaction Amount Comments Check Number Totals Check 58674 US WEST - Number 58674 SECURITY DEPT US WEST - SECURITY DEPT 1.80 Check Number 58676 58676 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 08-Apr-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 264.21 PHONE SERVICE 58676 22-Jan-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 45.94 DECEMBER 58676 22-Jan-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 77.12 DECEMBER 58676 08-Apr-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 45.20 PHONE SERVICE 58676 19-Feb-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 55.62 CIVIL DEFENSE 58676 04-Peb-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 256.35 PHONE SERVICE 58676 04-Peb-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 94.84 PHONE SERVICE 58676 04-Feb-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 40.65 PHONE SERVICE 58676 08-Apr-99 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 2,067.54 ONE TIME CHGS 58676 04-Peb-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 1,219.36 PHONE SERVICE 50676 04-Peb-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 58.31 PHONE SERVICE 58676 04-Peb-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 55.73 PHONE SERVICE 58676 22-Jan-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 42.20 DECEMBER Totals Check Number 58676 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Check Number 58677 UW EXTENSION 58677 08-Apr-99 UW EXTENSION Totals Check Number 58677 UW EXTENSION Check Number 58678 VEB, LIN 58678 06-Apr-99 V2B, LIN Totals Check Number 58678 VEE, LIN Check Number 58679 WALDOR PUMP 58679 08-Apr-99 WALDOR PUMP Totals Check Number 58679 WALDOR PUMP Check Number 58680 WARNING LITES OP MN 58680 58680 58680 OB-Apr-99 08-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 WARNING LITES OF HN WARNING LITES OP MN WARNING LITES OP MN Totals Check Number 58680 WARNING LITES OP MN ’heck Number 58681 WESTERN HENN CO PIONEER ASSOC 58681 58681 06-Apr-99 06-Apr-99 WESTERN HENN CO PIONEER ASSOC WESTERN HENN CO PIONEER ASSOC Totals Check Number 58681 WESTERN HENN CO PIONEER ASSOC 4,323.07 156.00 156.00 122.76 122.76 130.00 130.00 66.95 108 95 98.41 274.31 14.95 14.95 29.90 Page 16 ROOM - WEINBERGER MILEAGE - TRAINING SERVICE CALL - LS 811 TRAFPIC CNTRL SIGNS BARRICADES BARRICADES ORONO HISTORY BOOK ORONO HISTORY BOOK 9 Apr 1999 Fri 10s30 AM Check Humber Check Number 58682 Check Register City of Orono Date Name 58682 WOLF, LANETTE 06-Apr-99 WOLF, LANETTE Totals Check Number 58682 WOLF, LANETTE Check Number 58683 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 58683 58683 07-Jan-99 07-Jan-99 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Totals Check Number 58683 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Check Number 58684 YOCUM OIL CO INC. 58684 06-Apr-99 YOCUM OIL CO INC. Totals Check Number 58684 YOCUM OIL CO INC. Check Number 58685 YOUNG, JACKIE 58685 06-Apr-99 YOUNG, JACKIE Totals Check Number 58685 YOUNG, JACKIE Check Number 58686 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES Grand Total Transaction Amount 150.00 150.00 8.00 25.31 33.31 109.26 109.26 550.00 550.00 340,383.31 Page 17 Comments COUNCIL MINUTES 3/8/99 ELECTRICAL SERVICE ELECTRICAL SERVICE FUEL OIL - CLUB HOUSE PARK COM 3/1/99 58686 08-Apr-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 77.50 INS AGENT PEE QTR 2 58686 08-Apr-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 182.50 INS AGENT FEE OTR 2 58686 08-Apr-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 80.00 INS AGENT FEE QTR 2 58686 08-Apr-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 1,460.00 INS AGENT FEE QTR 2 58686 08-Apr-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 77.50 INS AGENT FEE QTR 1 58686 08-Apr-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 182.50 INS AGENT FEE QTR 1 58686 08-Apr-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 80.00 INS AGENT FEE QTR 1 58686 08-Apr-99 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 1,460.00 INS AGENT FEE QTR 1 Totals Check Number 58686 YOUNGDAHL COMPANIES 3,600.00 ^.5 7 Apr 1999 Wed 12t06 PM Check Number Check Number S8545 Check Register City of Orono Date Name S8545 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 07-Apr-99 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Totals Check Number 58545 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Number 58546 58546 58546 58546 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 07-A?r-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 Totals Check Number FIRST NATIONAL BANK OP LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 58546 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Check Number 58547 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. 58547 07-Apr-99 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO Totals Check Number 58547 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO Transaction Amount 7,924.00 7,924.00 3«502.41 3«502.41 8,178.00 15,182.82 830.68 830.68 Page 1 Comments SAVINGS W/H 6 TRANSFERRED FICA & MEDICARE W/M FICA.MEDCR CITY SHARE FEDERAL WITHHOLDING DEFERRED COMP W/H Check Number 58548 58548 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 07-Apr-99 Totals Check Number ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 58548 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Check Number 58549 58549 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 07-Apr-99 Totals Check Number LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 59349 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Check Number 58550 58550 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT 07-A?r-99 Totals Check Number MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT 59550 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Check Number 58551 58551 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 07-Apr-99 Totals Check Number MN DEPT OP REVENUE 58551 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Check Number 58552 58552 MN MUTUAL LIFE 07-Acr-99 Totals Check Number MN MUTUAL LIFE 58552 MN MUTUAL LIFE Check Number 58553 58553 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP 07-Apr-99 Totals Check Number MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP 50553 MN STATE RETIREMENT-DEF COMP 250.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 179.51 179.51 3,513.16 3,513.16 703.00 703.00 227.00 227.00 DEFERRED COMP W/H UNION DUES WH SKREEN #0010755723 STATE TAX W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H DEFERRED COMP W/H , * ? i i i 7 Apr 1999 Wed 12:06 PM Check Nunber Check Humber Check Humber 58S54 Check Register City of Orono Date Hama 58553 MH STATE RETIREMENT-DEP COMP 58554 PEBSCO/OBRA 07-Apr-99 Totals Check Number PEBSCO/OBRA 58554 PEBSCO/OBRA Transaction Amount 20.47 20.47 Page 2 Comments OBRA DEFERRED CCMP W/H Check Humber 58555 PEBSCO/US CONF OP MAYORS 58555 07-Apr-99 Totals Check Number PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 58555 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 2M83.95 2M83.95 USCM DEFERRED COMP W/H Check Humber 58556 58556 58556 PERA 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 Totals Check Number PERA PERA 58556 PERA 4«591.43 6,043.56 10,634.99 PERA EMPLOYEE W/H PERA CITY SHARE Check Humber 58557 UNITED WAY 58557 07-Apr-99 Totals Check Number UNITED WAY 58557 UNITED WAY 31.00 31.00 CHARITY DONATIONS W/H Grand Total 41,980.58 7 Apr 1999 Wed 9:38 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 1 Check Number Employee Name Check Number 045812 045812 JOHNSON* MARY ANN Totals Check Number 045812 Check Number 045813 045813 GBMAR* JAMIB L. Totals Check Number 045813 Check Number 045814 045814 KASBMAN* CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 045814 Check Number 045815 045815 NOORSE* RONALD J. Totals Check Number 045815 Check Number 045816 045816 VBE* LINDA S. Totals Check Number 045816 Check Number 045817 045817 KUEHN* THOMAS M. Totals Check Number 045817 Check NUniber 045818 045818 OLSON* RONALD J. Totals Check Number 045818 Check Number 045819 045819 PETTIT. SANDRA K. Totals Check Number 045819 Check Number 045820 045820 ANDERSON* BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 045820 Check Date 07-Apr-9j 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 Check Amount 676.77 676.77 445.19 445.19 684.83 684.83 1*578.85 1*578.85 1*092.29 1*092.29 1*005.84 1*005.84 25.59 25.59 772.71 772.71 522.09 522.09 *< V ! 7 Apr 1999 Wed 9:38 AN Check Register City of Orono Check Ntiniber Btnployee Naoie Check Number 045821 045821 BOBZIEN, SUE A. Totals Check Number 045821 Check Number 045822 045822 BORIS, SCOTT W. Totals Check Number 045822 Check Number 045823 045623 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. Totals Check Number 045623 Check Number 045824 045824 CHESWICK, GARY B. Totals Check Number 045824 Check Number 045825 045825 CORNICK, JAMES L. Totals Check Number 045825 Check Number 045826 045826 DEMBCXKRl, JAY C. Totals Check Number 045826 Check Number 045827 045827 ERICKSON. KURT R Totals Check Number 045827 Check Number 045828 045828 FARNIOK. CORREY L. Totals Check Number 045828 Qieck Number 045629 045829 FISCHENICH, DAN T. Totals Check Number 045829 Check Number 045830 Check Date 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 Page 2 Check Amount 701.36 701.36 1.187.96 1.187.96 537.99 537.99 1.446.65 1.446.65 1.467.17 1.467.17 1.265.00 1.265.00 1.248.91 1.248.91 1.258.57 1.258.57 1.150.50 1.150.50 1 7 Apr 1999 Ned 9:38 AM Check Register City of Orono Check HUiaber Employee Check Number 045630 045830 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K. Totals Check Number 045830 Check Number 045631 045831 HANSING, CAROL J. Totals Check Number 045831 Check Number 045832 045632 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 045632 Check Number 045833 045833 KNOLLENBBRO, KRISTIN L. Totals Check Number 045833 Check Number 045834 045834 MCNALLY, STEVZN A. Totals Check Number 045834 Check Number 045835 045835 MCNICHOLS, DAVID I. Totals Check Number 045835 Qieck Number 045836 045836 HORONCZYNSKI, JAMES Totals Check Number 045836 Check Number 045837 045837 PBRSELL, NILLIAM R. Totals Check Number 045837 Check Number 04*^938 045838 SCHOENHOFP, JOHN B. Totals Check Number 045836 Check Number 045639 Check Date 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr* 99 07-/^r-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 Page 3 Check Amount 892.32 892.32 387.68 387.68 1,237.38 1,237.33 438.52 436.52 1,035.19 1,035.19 659.39 659.39 1,510.37 1,510.37 392.34 392.34 1,302.73 1,302.73 i 7 Apr 1999 Httd 9x38 AM Check Register City of Orono Check NU8dt>er Employee Name Check Number 045839 045839 TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F. Totals Check Number 045839 Check Number 045840 045840 TOMCZYK, MARK W. Totals Check Number 045840 Check Number 045841 045841 WITTKB. ANTHONY A. Totals Check Number 045841 Check Number 045842 045842 HAGEN, MATTHEW D. Totals Check Number 045842 Check Number 045843 045843 HOBCHST, ROBYN A. Totals Check Number 045843 Check Number 045844 045844 JOHNSON, JEFFREY D. Totals Check Number 045844 Check Number 045845 045845 GAFFRON, MICHAEL P. Totals Check Number 045845 Qieck Number 045646 045846 QAPPA, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 045846 Check Number 045847 045847 OMAN, LYLE E. Totals Check Number 045847 Check Number 045848 Check Date 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-^r-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 Page 4 Check Amount 320.70 320.70 1,277.99 1,277.99 586.96 586.96 214.37 214.37 149.84 149.84 714.19 714.19 1,161.19 1,161.19 1,565.93 1,565.93 248.55 248.55 7 Apr 1999 Hed 9138 AM Check Register City o£ Orono Check Number Employee Heme Check Number 045^48 045848 VAN ZOMEREN, ELIZABETH Totals Check Number 045848 Check Number 045849 045849 VANG* BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 045849 Check Number 045850 045850 HECKMAN, STEPHEN J. Totals Check Number 045850 Check Number 045851 045851 NEINBERGER, PAUL E. Totals Check Number 045851 Check Number 045852 045852 BRINKHAUS, JOHN F. Totals Check Number 0458S2 Check Number 045853 045853 DBBAERE, DONALt L. Totals Check Number 045853 Check Number 045854 045854 GREGORY, JA»CS D. Totals Check Number 045854 Check Number 045855 C45855 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 045855 Check Number 045856 045856 OBBRAIGNER, SCOTT G. Totals Check Number 045856 Check Number 045857 Check Date 07-;^r-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 Page 5 Check Amount l,154.:i 1,154.11 993.71 993.71 70.19 70.19 802.42 802.42 1,115.06 1,115.06 871.68 871.68 590.30 590.30 649.78 649.78 619.56 619.56 7 Apr 1999 Ned 9:38 AN Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 045857 045857 OBRIEN, RANDY L. Totals Check Number 045857 Check Number 045858 045858 PALMER, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 045858 Check Number 045859 045859 RATHBUN, BARRY J. Totals Check Number 045859 Check Number 045860 045860 SKREEN, DALE S. Totals Check Number 045860 Check Number 045861 045861 STEFFENKAOEN, RONALD E. Totals Check Number 045861 Grand Total Check Date 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 07-Apr-99 Page 6 Check Amount 221.20 221.20 642.41 642.41 1,018.73 1,018.73 797.84 797.84 1,094.11 1,094.11 41,805.01 24 Mar 199? Wed 10:00 AM Check Register City Orono Check Number Bmployee Name Check Number 045757 045757 JOHNSON, MARY ANN Totals Check Number 045757 Check Number 045758 045758 OBMAR, JAMIE L. Totals Check Number 045758 Check Number 045759 045759 HASEMAN, CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 045759 Check Number 045760 C45760 HOORSB, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 045760 Check Number 045761 045761 VBE, LINDA S. Totals Check Number 045761 Check Number 045762 045762 KUBKN, THOMAS M. Totals Check Humber 045762 Check Humber 045763 045763 OLSON, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 045763 Check Number 045764 045764 PETTIT, SANDRA K. Totals Check Number 045764 Check Number 045765 045765 ANDERSON, BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 045765 Check Date 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Kar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 Page 1 Check Amount 549.02 549.02 263.62 263.62 722.99 722.99 1,578.85 1,578.85 1,092.29 1,092.29 1,005.84 1,005.84 25.59 25.59 772.71 772.71 296.32 296.32 •j.” i I . 24 Mar 1999 Ned 10:00 AM Check Register City of Orono Qieck Nunber Bn^loyee Name Check Number 045766 045766 BOBZIEN, SUE A. Totals Check Number 045766 Check Number 045767 045767 BORIS, SCOTT W. Totals Check Number 045767 Check Number 045768 045768 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. Totals Check Number 045768 Check Number 045769 045769 CHESNICK, GARY B. Totals Check Number 045769 Check Number 045770 045770 CORNICK, JAMES L. Totals Check Number 045770 Check Number 045771 045771 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C. Totals Check Number 045771 Check Number 045772 045772 ERICKSON, KURT R Totals Check Number 045772 Check Number 045773 045773 PARNIOK, CORREY L. Totals Check Number 045773 Check Number 045774 045774 FISCHENICH, DAN T. Totals Check Number 045774 Check Number 045775 Check Date 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 Page 2 Check Amount 652.69 652.69 1,129.45 1,129.45 224.20 224.20 1,446.65 1,446.65 1,157.98 1,157.98 1,268.39 1,268.39 1,248.91 1,248.91 1,259.62 1,259.62 1,104.40 1,104.40 'i 4 24 Mar 1999 Hed 10:00 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Humber Employee Name Check Humber C45775 045775 FISCHER, CHRISTCFHER K. Totals Check Humber 045775 Check Humber 045776 045776 KAHSIHG, CAROL J. Totals Check Number 045776 Check Number 045777 C45777 JOHNSON, BR.*.:'L2Y P. Totals Check Numoer 045777 Check Number 045778 045778 XNOLLENBBRO, KRISTIN L. Totals Check Humber 045778 Check Number 045779 045779 MCNALLY, STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 045779 Check Number 045780 045780 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L. Totals Check Number 045780 Check Number 045781 045781 NOROffCZYNSKI, JAMES Totals Check Number 045781 Check Number 04576: 045782 PERSELL, WILLIAM R. Totals Check Number 045782 Check Humber 045783 045783 SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B. Totals Check Number 045783 Check Number 045784 Check Date 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Kar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 Page 3 Check Amount 1,005.82 1,005.82 387.68 387.68 1.136.20 1.136.20 600.32 600.32 1,068.22 1,068.22 565.76 565.76 1,565.23 1,565.23 454.58 454.58 1,251.23 1,251.23 MV'rjiailk *IIF\ # r—*1.- rrf • -r-.-.tr.. L 24 Mar 1999 Wed 10:00 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Enqployee Name Check Number 045784 045784 TOMCHECK, LAWRENCE F. Totals Check Number 045784 Check Number 045785 045785 TOMCZYK, MARK W. Totals Check Number 045785 Check Number 045786 045786 WITTKE. ANTHONY A. Totals Check Number 045786 Qieck Number 045787 045787 HAGEN, MATTHEW D. Totals Check Number 045787 Check Number 045788 045788 JOHNSON, JEFFREY D. Totals Check Number 045788 Check Number 045789 045789 STEVENS, ROBERT S. Totals Check Number 045789 Check Number 045790 045790 GAFFRON, MICHAEL P. Totals Check Number 045790 Check Number 045791 045791 QAPPA, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 045791 Check Number 045792 045792 OMAN. LYLE E. Totals Check Number 045792 CTieck Number 045793 Check Date 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-S9 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 Page 4 Check Amount 260.31 260.31 1,277.99 1,277.99 156.57 156.57 122.73 122.73 714.19 714.19 108.73 108.73 1,161.19 1,161.19 1,565.93 1,565.93 17.83 17.83 24 Mar 1999 4ed 10:00 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Mumber Es^loyee Name Check Number 045793 045793 VAN Z0MER£N« ELIZABETH Totals Check Number 045793 Check Number 045794 C45794 VANG, BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 045794 Check Number 045795 045795 NECXMAN, STEPHEN J. Totals Check Number 045795 Check Number 045796 045796 NEINBEROER, PAUL E. Totals Check Number 045796 Check Number 045797 045797 BRINKHAUS, JOHN F. Totals Check Number 045797 Check Number 045798 045798 DEBAERE, DONALD L. Totals Check Number 045798 Check Number 045799 045799 GREGORT, JAMES D. Totals Check Number 045799 Check Number 045800 045800 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 045800 Check Number 045801 045801 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT 0. Totals Check Number 045801 Check Number 045802 Check Date 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 Page 5 Check Amount 1,065.06 1,065.06 993.71 993.71 70.19 70.19 802.42 802.42 1,115.06 1,115.06 1,149.52 1,149.52 639.15 639.15 690.49 690.49 639.56 639.56 ^5 !*•<' t- p' V i 24 Har 1999 Wed 10:00 AM Check NUnber Employee Name Check Number 045802 045802 OBRIEN, RANDY L. Totals Check Number 045802 Check Register City of Orono Page 6 Check Date 24-Mar-99 Check Amount 261.05 261.05 Check Number 045803 045803 PALMER, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 045803 Check Number 045804 045804 RATHBUN, BARRY J. Totals Check Number 045804 Check Number 045805 045805 SKRBBN, DALE S. Totals Check Number 045805 Check Number 045806 045806 ROSS, JOHN A. Totals Check Number 045806 Check Number 045807 045807 STBFFENKAGEN, RONALD E. Totals Check Number 045807 Grand Total 24-Mar-99 24-Mar>99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 24-Mar-99 803.22 803.22 923.77 923.77 655.42 655.42 13.95 13.95 1,094.11 1,094.11 40,136.71 * 4 . COUNCIL MEETING APR 1 2 1999 cu Y UH OHONO INFORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING I • COUNCIL MEETINQ APR 1 21999 OF CITY OF OHONO i I ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 COUNCIL MEETING APR I 2 1999 Cl I Y OF OROjvu ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the at)ove date with the foilowing members present: Chair Sandra Smith, Dale Lindquist, Lili McMiilan, Elizabeth Hawn, and Charles Schroeder. Commissioner Janice Berg and William Stoddard were absent. The following icpresented City Staff: City Pianner/Zoning Administrator Elizabeth Van Zomeren, Assistant Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Senior Planning Coordinator Mike Gaffron, and Recorder Jackie Young. Chair Smith called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. OLD BUSINESS: (#1) #2227 GARY TUCKER. 3466 IVY PLACE - VARIANCE Gary Tucker, Applicant, was present. Van Zomeren stated the Applicant applied for a variance in 1997 to make improvements to the existing residence. One of the proposed improvements involved covering a porch that encroached into the required side yard setback. The requested variance was approved and the Applicant applied for a building permit within the allowable time period. It was later determined by the Applicant that the proposed improvement to the roof of the porch would need to be revised to alleviate ice dam concerns. City Staff recommends approval of the requested design change to retain the previously granted variance. Van Zomeren stated City Staff has not received any comments from the neighbors regarding this application. Tucker remarked he has spoken with his neighbors on the north side who have stated they have no objections to the new plan. There were no public comments. Hawn moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2227, permitting a revised version of the r^of design in conjunction with the variance application approved in 1997 for property locatea at 3466 Ivy Place. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#2) #2451 LYLE AND GRETCHEN SHAW. 1750 SHADYWOOD - VARIANCES Lyle and Gretchen Shaw, Applicants, were present. Gerald Roelofs, Contractor, was also present. Weinberger stated the Applicants appeared before the Planning Commission in January of this year requesting variances to permit the addition of a garage and living space to the existing Page 1 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (#2461 Lyle and Gretchen Shaw, continued) residence. The Planning Commission at that time recommended approval of the variance to permit additional hardcover based on the condition that the Applicants reduce structural coverage on the lot to 15 percent and on the condition that the Applicants submit a drainage plan that is acceptable to CKy Staff. The Applicants have submitted a revised plan to conform to the allowable structural coverage, but the revised plan requires an additional variance to raise the roof of the house within the 0-75* iakeshore setback and within the average lakeshore setback. The original plan did not propose any changes to the building within the 75* lakeshore setback. The revised plan is proposing to raise the roof sb( feet above the existing roof line, which would increase the 1/2 story to a full story. Weinberger stated the neighbors to the south had expressed some drainage concerns and the Applicants are required to submit a grading and drainage plan for review and approval by City Staff. Roeiofs presented some diagrams of the residence to the Planning Commission, and stated that it is their intention to increase the height of the walls to six feet/six Inches to allow for more living space in the home. Chair Smith noted that this improvement will not increase or alter structural coverage and that no height variance is needed for this application. Weinberger stated he has received no comments from the adjoining property owners. Roeiofs stated he is working with the neighbors to address their drainage concerns. McMillan inquired whether there are any problems anticipated with the present foundation of the structure. Roeiofs stated to his knowledge this is a very well built house and the foundation should be fine. Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2451, 1750 Shadywood, as submitted, subject to submittal of an acceptable drainage and grading plan. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#3) #2457 PAULA AND DAVID LINDBERG, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Paula and David Lindberg, Applicants, were present. Van Zomeren stated this application was reviewed at the February, 1999 Planning Commission meeting where it was suggested that the Applicants revise their proposal to limit structural coverage to 15 percent and reduce hardcover. Van Zomeren stated this residence lies within the LR-1B district, which has a minimum lot size of one acre. This lot is comprised of .729 acres, is located on a penisula and has two lakeshore setback areas. The Applicants have submitted a revised plan which reduces hardcover from 33.44 percent to 32.33 percent, or a reduction of 170 square feet, by proposing to attach the garage to the residence. This revised plan does bring structural coverage into compliance, but a variance will need to be granted to hardcover in the C-75* setback on the Baldur Park side to permit a driveway. The Applicants are Page 2 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2467 Paula and David Lindberg, continued) proposing 7.32 percent hardcover in the 0-75' setback to construct a driveway. The Appiicants are not requesting hardcover in the 0-75' setback on the north side of the property. Van Zomeren stated no comments have been received from the adjoining property owners regarding this application. Lindberg stated a hardship exists due to the two 0-75' lakeshore setback areas. Chair Smith commented that the Planning Commission appreciates the revisions to the plan to bring the structural coverage into compliance, but in her view the Applicants should attempt to further reduce hardcover to the existing 29 percent or the allowable hardcover limit of 25 percent. Smith stated that the Planning Commission's view is that new structure should meet the 25 percent hardcover limit whenever possible. Lindberg noted that they have pulled the house back from the lake. Smith suggested that the Applicants take another look at possibly reducing hardcover in the 75-250' setback. Hawn indicated she would prefer the Applicants limit hardcover closer to 25 percent and would allow the 810 feet necessary for the driveway in the 0-75' setback area. Hawn inquired if the residence meets the allowable 25 percent and the driveway is factored in, how much the total hardcover would be. Van Zomeren stated the hardcover would be over by 302 square feet if the driveway is not factored in. McMillan stated she is in agreement with Hawn in that the Appiicants should reduce hardcover closer to the 25 percent limit, and that the Applicants may want to look at reducing or eliminating the porch in order to lower hardcover. Lindquist commented the Planning Commission is looking for the Applicants to reduce hardcover by 302 square feet. Van Zomeren indicated the Applicants will need to lower structural coverage to 4600 square feet. Schroeder indicated the Applicants are proposing to reduce hardcover in the 0-75' setback by moving the house. Lindberg stated he would be willing to look at ways to further reduce hardcover. Hawn stated the application should be reviewed by the Planning Commission after the revisions are made since it will require changes to the design. There were no public comments. Smith indicated that in her view the Applicant should reduce hardcover to at least 30 percent in the 75-250' setback and leave the other hardcover as is. Smith noted that the Applicants have been a significant improvement in the 0-75' setback by moving the house away from the take. Smith stated the Applicants will need to appear before the Planning Commission again to have the revisions reviewed. Page 3 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2457 Paula and David Undberg, continued) Van Zomeren stated the next Planning Commission meeting is set for April 19th. and if the application is approved, then it would go to the April 26 City Council meeting. Hawn inquired whether a conditional use permit is necessary for this application. Van Zomeren stated the final resolution will need to have language included which spells out that some work will be done in the 0*75' setback to remove the old foundation and to put the grade back to what was existing. Van Zomeren stated a grading and drainage plan will need to be submitted. Undberg inquired if he reduces the garage by 260 square feet, whether that would satisfy the Planning Commission's concerns. McMillan stated the Applicant should attempt to reduce it by 300 square feet. Hawn indicated she was in agreement with McMillan. McMillan stated the Applicant should review the application very closely and not make a quick decision tonight. Smith stated it appears the consensus or the Planning Commission is to have the Applicants reduce structural coverage to 30 percent. Smith inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to table this application for a month in order to allow him time to submit revised plans. Undberg indicated he would be willing to table the application. Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application #2457,1392 Baldur Park Road, to allow the Applicant time to revised plans reducing structural coverage to 30 percent. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#4) #2458 PROPOSED ZONING AMENDMENT: LR>1C-1 DENSITY CREDIT Gaffron stated the Planning Commission had reacted favorably to eliminating the 50 percent density credit in the LR-1C-1 district at their February meeting. It was further suggested that retention of the ability in LR-1 C-1 to create attached dwelling units would enable clustering and the preservation of trees and green space that is not possible In the LR-1C zone. Elimination of the 50 percent credit without retaining the ability for attached units would remove any distinguishing characteristics between the LR-1C and LR-1 C-1 Districts. In this case, it would be most appropriate to eliminate the LR-1 C-1 designation from the zoning code, and rezone all LR-1 C-1 properties to LR-1C. City Staff would like to see the hardcover standards amended in the LR-1 C-1 zone to keep the code consistent if the City decides to keep this zone. Gaffron stated that the City has received a letter from Paul Larson who has indicated that he is in opposition to the proposed elimination of the 50 percent density credit because it v^ll reduce the value of his property by eliminating 1/3 of the potential dwelling units he might be allowed under the current code. Chair Smith inquired whether there were any public comments regarding this amendment. Page 4 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (#2458 Proposed Zoning Amendment, continued) Nancy Mead. 30 Interlocken Lane, inquired whether this Hern could be tabled in order to allow her brother. Paul Larson, to attend the meeting to express his concerns regarding the proposed amendment. Mead indicated her brother will be out of town for the next few days. Monica Brown. Brown Road South, stated she had a question regarding clustering. Smith stated that is one option that could be utilized. Gaffron stated that any property that took advantage of the PRD standards would have to cluster. If the resident chose to do a straight subdivision, you could have 1/2 acre lots under the proposed ordinance without having to cluster. Gaffron remarked that this proposed zoning amendment only affects the LR-1C-1 district, which is less than 30 acres. Hawn inquired if you have to do either a PRD or a subdivision so that you cannot take a two acre lot and have a three unit building with a single home. Gaffron stated if you take a two acre site, such as the Larson property, under the standard 1/2 acre zoning, you could potentially construct four units, but under standard plat, you have to exclude the area of the road, so it's likely that you would only have three units. Under a PRD. under the proposed zoning, you can have two attached units, but you cannot have a single unit under this zoning amendment. Hawn stated she was in favor of option one, but had some concerns that Larson was not in attendance at tonight's meeting to express his views. Hawn inquired whether compensation is available to those property owners who would be affected by this ordinance. Gaffron stated the City has not offered compensation to property owners affected by zoning changes in the past. Schroeder remarked that this zoning amendment is not directed at any single piece of property. McMillan inquired whether he would be able to attend the March 22 City Council meeting. Mead commented that she expected her brother back in two to three days and that he should be able to attend Monday's meeting. Gaffron stated if the Planning Commission takes action on this item tonight, it will be presented to the City Council at the March 22 meeting. Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, recommending that District LR-1C-1 be amended to eliminate 50 percent density credit but allow attachment of units via PRD to remain, adding Shoreland reference and revising hardcover standard. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS (#5) #2444 BRIAN AND SUSAN SCHEBLER, 1354 REST POINT CIRCLE • VARIANCE, 7:33 p.m. - 8:02 p.m. Brian and Susan Schebler, Applicants, were present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting an afler-the-fact variance to permit a detached. Page 5 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2444 Brian and Susan Schebler, continued) ground level deck located on the lakeside of the residence. The deck is located 86 feet from the Ordinary High Water Level of Lake Minnetonka. Weinberger stated a number of permits were issued in 1989 to ailow for a large addition to the home in 1989. Following a recent survey by Gronberg, it was determined that some hardcover that was requested to be removed at that time was still existing. Approval was subject to the previous property owners removing a gravel parking area on the property and reducing the size of the driveway. City Staff recommends that the gravel parking area located on the north part of the property remain in that it is used for parking by the home owners and provides an area for snow storage. The rock located around the driveway protects this portion of the property from erosion as much of the drainage in this area follows the slope. This is a difficult area to maintain due to the steep slope that exists. Weinberger stated the hardcover worksheets completed by the surveyor include areas that were called hardcover but under definition are not necessarily hardcover because a plastic underiayment does not exist. One area is located near the driveway and the second area is located in front of the house on the lakeside. Staff is not recommending that the Applicants remove any of this hardcover since it protects the area from erosion. Weinberger noted that the hardcover in the 75-250' setback comprises 30.24 percent, which still requires a variance. Weinberger stated all other lot requirements are met by the proposal and is not subject to average lakeshore setback. The Planning Commission needs to determine whether this type of development would have been approved if the Applicants had obtained the appropriate permits before construction of the deck. City Staff is recommending approval of the after-the-fact variance due to the hardship that exists on the property in that much of the hardcover that exists on the property is necessary for erosion control and some public purpose. Chair Smith Inquired whether those two areas were the only two areas requested to be removed. Weinberger stated that the Scheblers have voluntarily removed some hardcover on the property. Smith inquired whether back in 1989 any other hardcover was supposed to have been removed that has not been. Weinberger stated just the driveway and the rock were requested to be removed. Schebler stated they have been attempting to clean up the property and reduce hardcover. Smith inquired whether there should be a condition that no additional hardcover be allowed on this property. Hawn stated she has a problem with this application and that hardcover needs to be further reduced. Hawn remarked she would not have granted a variance to allow the deck and would ask that the Applicants remove the deck. McMillan stated she was in agreement that the hardcover needs to be reduced. Schroeder stated he was not in favor of this application. Page 6 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15. iw99 (#2444 Brian and Susan Schebler, continued) Sciiebier stated a tot of hardcover has already been removed, with the deck being designed to allow the water to seep into the ground. Schebler indicated he will continue to reduce hardcover on this lot wherever possible. Schroeder commented that most of what Schebler has removed has not been counted in the hardcover figures. Mrs. Schebler stated they were told they could have a deck on the property. Smith commented that it appears the Planning Commission is recommending that the deck be removed. Mrs. Schebler stated that they could perhaps remove the rock around the house. Smith inquired whether this application should be tabled to see if additional hardcover can be removed. Schebler stated the driveway probably cannot be reduced. Lindquist commented he has a problem with using gravel as a tradeoff. Weinberger remarked there may be some confusion over the fact that there are other times when garages and decks are granted, but there is nothing in the code that states that a garage or a deck would be granted simply because a lakeshore property is without one. Schebler remarked he would be willing to have this application tabled and meet with City Staff in an effort to reduce hardcover. There were no public comments. Schroeder moved, Smith seconded, to table Application #2444,1354 Rest Point Circle, to allow the Applicants time to reduce legitimate hardcover by a minimum of 900 square feet. VOTE: Ayes 5. Nays 0. (#6) #2461 CHRIS PIERSON. ON BEHALF OF BRYSONS/JOHNSONS. 650,660,670,680 BID ISLAND, LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT. 8:03 p.m. • 8:22 p.m. Chris Pierson, on behalf of the Applicants, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a tot line rearamgement and lot combination for lots located at 650-660^70^80 Big Island. The lots are currently three separate seasonal residences on four tax parcels that are to be combined into two parcels. The Applicants are proposing to combine Lots 3.4 and one-half of Lot 5 to create one tax parcel on Big Island, and the center lot would be split and added to the 650 lot. Weinberger remarked the main issues to address would be the future of the existing cabin located on Lot 5. Fire Code does not allow a structure to exist this close to the property line. There are also exists some zoning code requirements which would require variances to be granted to allow a residence to be located this close to a lot line, and a conditional use permit would be necessary to allow a guest cabin. Currently City Code does not allow two principal residences to be located Page 7 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (#2461 Chris Pierson, continued) on one lot. The Applicants are proposing to keep the existing cabin, which Staff cannot support, and Staff has stated the cabin on Lot 5 shaii be removed prior to the filing of the subdivision with Hennepin County. The State Building Code does not allow buildings to be located within three feet of property boundaries. Weinberger stated this proposed lot tine rearrangement would reduce density on Big Island and the eventual removal of structure and hardcover and returning the area more to its natural appearance. Currently the cabin located on Lots 5 and 6 shares a well located to the south, which would be moved to 650 property should the lot line rearrangement be approved, and also shares a septic system serving the property at 670. Staff is requesting that the septic lines be capped, and the proposal would be one septic site for one residence. Staff is also requesting that the easements and any other agreements relating to the well and septic systems be vacated and eliminated. At the time this was platted, there would not have been drainage and utility easements to vacate over the old property line, but Staff is requesting that there be five feet on each side of the interior property line and ten feet across the rear of the property line for drainage and utility <'asements. Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rearrangement to create the two tax parcels with Lots 3.4, and 5 making up one parcel, and Lots 6.7, and 8 making up the other parcel. Staff is requesting that the cabin located on Lot 5 be removed, along with the deck, stairway, sidewalk, and removal of the shed, prior to the filing of the subdivision with Hennepin County. Staff is also requesting that tnie o^nions be delivered to the City for Lots 3 through 8. Pierson stated the property was acquired from Betty Fisher who had requested at the time of purchase that the cabin remain for a period of time due to sentimental reasons, which was agreed to by Bryson and Johnson. Chair Smith inquired what the use of the cabin will be should it remain on the property. Bryson indicated that they have no intentions on utilizing the cabin and are willing to remove it in two to three years. Johnson stated, if possible, they would like the cabin to remain for the next five years, but if the Planning Commission decided otherwise, they would be willing to remove the cabin. There were no public comments. Lindquist indicated he would be agreeable to allowing the cabin to remain on the property for two years. Smith commented that the only issue with this application appears to be the cabin. Weinberger remarked that City Staff does have concerns regarding enforcement should the cabin not be removed. Pierson stated the City could require that the cabin be removed, and If not. a court order for its removal could be issued. Lindquist commented a bond could be required at a reasonable cost. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to allow the cabin to remain for two and a half Pages ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2461 Chris Pierson, continued) years. Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, recommending approval of Application #2461, 650,660,670, and 680 Big Island, subject to removal of the cabin located on Lot 5, along with the deck, stairway, steps and shed within the sideyard setback, within the next 30 months, filing of the subdivision be completed shortly after approval by the City Council; further subject to vacation of the utility, well, and drainage easements shortly after approval by the City Council of the lot line rearrangement, with the appropriate drainage and utility easements being granted to the City as requested by City Staff, and a title opinion will be completed and a copy provided to the City prior to filing of the subdivision. This approval Is also based on the understanding that the cabin located on Lot 5 will not be used during the next 30 months. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Schroeder requested that the Applicants draft the appropriate agreements subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. (#7) #2462 DAVID LOVELACE, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 220 BIG ISLAND - VARIANCE, 8:25 p.m. - 6:37 p.m. David Lovelace, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a lot area variance to create a buildable lot on Big Island. The existing lot is 4.3 acres where 5 acres is the minimum lot size for building. Weinberger stated access to the lot is an issue, noting that there are a number of platted right-of- ways within Big Island, which would allow access to the lot. In 1983, most lots on Big Island were granted automatic lot area variances when the island was rezoned to RS. The previous property owner never filed their application to have their automatic lot area variance granted, making it a record lot, and the time period has expired for a free automatic variance. Staff recommends approval of the variance to permit 220 Big Island to be a buildable lot, and to waive the one year expiration for the variance. Weinberger stated the main issue is access to the tot for docking nghts. It should be noted that City Code requires that docks on Big Island are for the use of the owners and their guests and not to be loaned or rented for money. If the Applicant requested dock space, a permit would need to be issued by the City Council. City Staff is also requesting that an existing cabin, which is currently in ruins, be removed prior to construction prior to any building permit being issued. Lovelace stated an agreement exists where restricts construction on the north area of the property, noting he is willing to remove the old cabin that currently exists on the parcel. Weinberger remarked that an easement granted by the previous property owner as a conservation area to the north to avoid any new structure being constructed in that area, and the Applicant has agreed to file a copy of the easement with the City and have it placed it on the title. Lovelace indicated at this time he does not have an intention to store boats on Big Island, but would like to have a permit issued to have a dock on the property. Pages ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (#2462 David Lovalace, continued) Weinberger stated the previous owner did have dock rights with the neighboring property owner, which was grandfathered in. Schroeder indicated that access to this lot should be granted before approval of this application is given. Lindquist indicated he would be willing to approve this application subject to access being granted by the City Council. Schroeder suggested that this application be tabled until access is obtained. Lovelace Indicated he will not be obtaining any building permits unless access is obtained. Chair Smith inquired whether there were any public comments concerning this application. Gerald Walsh, 180 Big Island, commented that there are three public accesses available. Smith remarked that the residents are not allowed to leave their mode of transportion on the public right-of-way. Rodney Minnich, 340 Old Crystal Bay South, commented that the Applicant could buy an aquatic car. Smith stated the issue is that the residents cannot leave their mode of transportation on public land. McMillan inquired whether there were suitable septic sites availabir,. Lovelace commented that the septic inspector has found three o; four sites which will probably be suitable for his use. Lovelace stated a mound system would be required if he builds in excess of 800 square feet. Hawn moved, McMillan seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2462, granting of a lot area variance to create a buildable lot at 220 Big Island, subject to access being obtained and septic issues being resolved. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#8) ROBERT ERICKSON, 364 and 372 WESTLAKE STREET. LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT. 8:38 p.m. -9:10 p.m. Robert Erickson, Applicant, along with Mike Cronin, were present. Weinberger stated the Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan for the proposed lot line rearrangement at their November. 1998 meeting. The Applicant has revised the plans slightly. Currently Lot 9. the 364 property, is a narrow parcel consisting of .65 acres, and the property located at 372 Westlake Street consists of 2.01 acres, which makes it a conforming lot. 372 Westlake Street has a residence currently situated on it. which is being occupied at the present time, along with two guest cabins. The lot was assessed for only one sewer unit although it does contain the three separate dwelling units. The property currently is not hooked up to sanitary sewer, and the owners have indicated that they wilt hookup to sanitary sewer upon approval of their application. Page 10 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (Robert Erickson, continued) Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rearrangement as proposed on the survey subject to the Applicant granting easements 10 feet along the exterior property lines and five feet along interior property lines; removal of all existing structures on both the 364 and 372 Westlake Street prior to the filing of the lot line rearrangement; the on-site sewage treatment system located on the 372 lot be removed and the grade restored to the existing conditions shown on the survey; granting of variances for both lots for lot area to create buildable lots; and that the property located at 372 Westlake Street pay a SAC fee and connect to sanitary sewer. Mike Cronin requested that the Planning Commission implement the previous approval subject to City Staff’s recommendations. There were no public comments. Hawn indicated she has a problem with taking a conforming lot and making it non-conforming. Smith indicated there is an issue regarding sewer. Hawn inquired whether the assessment has ever been paid for the hookup. Cronin indicated that the assessment has been paid but not the SAC charge. McMillan stated the lot should not require further building variances and creates a workable building pad. Lindquist commented that perhaps the condition that no further variances will be granted on th’.:; property. McMillan moved to recommend approval of Application #2465,364 and 372 Westlake Street, for a lot line rearrangement subject to City Staff’s recommendations #1-5 outlined in their March 4,1999 memorandum, granting of a lot area variance and average lakeshore setback to allow both lots to be developed without further Planning Commission and City Council review; and further subject to the residence being removed by October, 1999. Erickson stated the previous owner has the right to occupy the residence until October of this year. Cronin indicated the Applicant would like to keep the residence until the lot is sold. Cronin stated they would be willing to remove all structures at 372 Westlake Street as soon as the appropriate arrangements are made. Weinberger stated the proposal would create a front and back lot subdivision, and no agreement has been reached with the Applicant regarding access. It Is the City ’s position that the alley leading to the lake should not be vacated. McMillan inquired whether it was currently being used as access. Weinberger stated it is not. McMillan suggested that the City make improvements to this road and retain rights to it. Cronin stated that they are willing to take out the old blacktop at their expense and landscape that area If the City Council so desires, but at this time they would like to proceed forward with the Page 11 1 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (Robert Erickson, continued) lot line rearrangement. Schroeder commented that now is the time to discuss how access for emergency vehicles will be gained. Weinberger stated a cuNle-sac would be preferred by City Staff if an agreement can be reached. Erickson remarked that he has recently purchased the adjoining property consisting of .44 acres. Smith suggested that City Staff look at this situation and come up with some options for a driveway. Schroeder inquired whether this was an acceptable agreement with the Applicant. Cronin stated they are trying to avoid variances if possible and would like the Planning Commission to approve the lot tine rearrangement. Smith stated approval should be contingent upon City Staff and Applicant agreeing to some dimensions for the cul-de-sac. McMillan amended her motion to include, subject to City Staff review and approval of an acceptable agreement regarding access. Motion was seconded by Lindquist. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (Recess taken from 9:10 p.m. - 9:16 p.m.) (#9) #2466 JAMES RENCKENS, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 3020 WATERTOWN ROAD, 2 LOT SUBDIVISION, 9:16 p.m. -10:27 p.m. John Winston, on behalf of the Renckens, was present. Van Zomeren stated the Applicants are proposing to subdivide an 11.94 acre parcel into two lots. Lot 1 consists of 8.43 acres, with 7.30 acres being dry, and Lot 2 consists of 3.51 acres, with 2.73 acres being dry. Lot 1 is considered a flag lot, subject to back lot standards. Lot 2 is a front lot. Both Lots 1 and 2 are proposed to have access onto Watertown Road. This subdivision is unique in the fact that one lot is platted in an east/west direction and the other lot is platted in a north/south direction. Van Zomeren stated the Park Commission has recommended accepting a park dedication fee in lieu of land for this subdivision. The Hennepin County Assessor has been asked to review the proposal and determine the fair market value of the undeveloped land. Steve Weckman has evaluated the proposed septic locations and has determined that a variance for the location of the drainfield will be required. Van Zomeren remarked that a bam currently situated on the property will need to be removed. Tom Kellogg, City Engineer, has revised his letter so that the City’s stormwater management plan, which calls for an 18 inch storm sewer to be installed on this property, the recommendation for a Page 12 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2466 James Renckens, continued) drainage easement across the property.has been eliminated. The needed easement has been determined to be located further east than what Kellogg had originally determined. Kellogg has also expressed concerns regarding a 30 foot corridor off of Lot 1, which needs to be determined if that is appropriate, and there is a need for a 33 foot right-of-way to be dedicated for Watertown Road. The Applicant will also need to submit a grading and drainage plan for the site. Kellogg is recommending that a stormwater management pond be constructed as well. Van Zomeren stated the issues before the Planning Commission involve making a determination that the flag lot with the 30 foot lot is acceptable or should an outlot be created, and the location of the stormwater management pond needs to be determined. Chair Smith inquired why the back lot is Just one lot and whether that lot will be subdivided in the future. Van Zomeren stated it was her understanding that the Applicant wished to construct a home on this site. If the Applicant wished to create two back lots, they would each have to comprise three acres, minus the area needed for the pond and minus the land potentially for the cutlot, the total parcel would consist of approximately 6.9 acres. SmHh commented that there are some options that should be mentioned if the Applicant wished to pursue another route. Winston stated Mr. Renckens out of town on business and is unable to attend tonight's meeting. Winston commented *iiat he was not sure what the creation of an outlot would accomplish, noting that the Applic«mt is proposing to construct a house on the back lot and sell off Lot 2. The Applicant would prefer that the roadway not be extended across his land, noting that the road would interfere v^h the buildability of Lot 2. Winston noted that the subdivider of Crystal Creek had the obligation to construct the roadway and it is not the obligation of the City. Alan Cartson, 3125 Fox Street, stated he was the former developer of Crystal Creek and there are two promises that are before the Planning Commission. One, the City promised to develop a network of roads in this area with the understanding that the roads would eventually become necessary as the City becomes developed. Two, the owner of the land to the north was promised an extension of the roadway across the northern half of this property. Carlson indicated he is not aware of the documei that Winston was referring to when he referenced the fact that the subdivider is responsible for construction of the roadway. Cartson remarked that MNDot is in the process of taking approximately four acres of his land, which will make the lot too close to the highway, and his intention is to possibly donate the rest of the land to the City to try to offset the capital gain. Carlson expressed a concern that access needs to be provided, especially in light of the promises that are well established In the record. McMillan noted that the resolution was approved in 1997. Van Zomeren stated that because the layout of Highway 12 was not determined in 1991, each year. Mr. Carlson renewed his interest in the subdivision, wit't the finai layout being determined in 1997. Page 13 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 18,1999 (#2466 James Renckens, continued) Van Zomeren indicated in her view the drainage and grading issues can be resolved. Smith commented that one of the significant issues facing the Planning Commission is the future access to Lot 1 and whether an outlet wilt be necessary. Smith noted that the City has required outlets in the past, so that would be a consistent policy of the City that could be pursued. Van Zomeren stated the size of the back tot is more than double the minimum three acre requirement. Smith stated if this parcel is subdivided in the future, there will be some issues that will need to be addressed. Lindquist Inquired whether an outlet needs to be created for road division. Van Zomeren remarked that the code discourages the use of flag lots, and in her view this lot should be defined as a flag lot/back lot. McMillan inquired whether with a flag lot an outlot needs to be created on the back lot. Van Zomeren commented that Is one issue that is before the Planning Commission. Gaffron stated if the Planning Commission detennines the northerly lot to be a back lot, City Code does not allow for the creation of the back lot without the 30 foot outlot. Smith stated in her view the northern access should be looked at rather than creating a narrow strip, and consideration needs to be given to the location of the septic site. Smith commented that perhaps access off of Watertown Road is one viable option for this development, or coming off the cuLde-sac at Crystal Creek. Van Zomeren stated an administrative variance will need to be granted for the septic system due to the closeness of the site to the stormwater drainage pond. Van Zomeren remarked that she has not considered access off of the cul-de-sac at Crystal Creek as a legitimate acce'.s point but rather considered access off of Watertown Road. If the Planning Commission determines that access to that one lot will be allowed off of Crystal Creek Road, then the preliminary and final plat resolutions for Crystal Creek need to be amended. Van Zomeren noted that if an easement is granted hrough the Crystal Creek subdivision. City Council needs to approve an amendment to the subdivision. Lindquist commented that it was his understanding Crystal Creek Road was a private road and that the City does not have the ability to grant access off of that road. Schroeder stated if access cannot be provided, then the subdivision will have to be denied. Lindquist remarked that without approval for the private road, the Planning Commission really has no other option but to consider what is being presented tonight, which is a flag lot. Hawn remarked that without knowing the exact location of the septic system, it is difficult to approve this application. Dwight Post stated he is Intending to purchase the lot In front, and he is not sure why the northern outlot was not provided for in the first place by the Crystal Creek developer. Post remarked in his opinion there are a lot of issues that are not in compliance now and the developer should have been made to comply with the codes. Page 14 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2466 James Renckens, continued) Carlson commented he does not prefer the plan that Is being proposed by Renckens, and the City needs to look at a long-range plan for ponding and roadways. Winston remarked that the minutes reflect that the subdivider Is responsible for access, and In his view the access to Carlson's northern property next to Highway 12 will ultimately come out to Crystal Bay Road. Carlson stated it is doubtful that a road will be able to be constructed along the northerly portion of the lot. Van Zomeren stated the septic site Is 58 feet from the stormwater management pond where the requirement is 75 feet, and 13 feet from the driveway where the requirement Is 20 feet. The soutiwest comer of the septic site is approximately three feet from the property line. The driveway needs to be located ten feet from the Crystal Creek subdivision and ten feet from the front lot and be located in the middle of the lot, which would leave it 13 feet from the septic site. Post stated that Weckman had mentioned that the septic site could be slightly altered. Smith remarked that the septic site will need to be reviewed by City Staff. Gaffron stated the comprehensive plan and City's actions and policies are centered around corridors for future connection of roadways. Gaffron stated it has been City's Staffs view that it is good planning to place a roadway across the northern portion of this property and that the Planning Commission could mandate that as part of the approval process. Van Zomeren commented it is presently platted as a flag lot, and Orono's subdivision ordinance says that it should be platted as an outlet. The outlet access can be platted at 30 feet since it will serve as a driveway for potentially one or two residences. Schroeder remarked that the northern 50 foot outlet extending the road should be platted even if it is not going to be built at this time, noting that the City's map shows all kinds of platted roads that are not presently constructed. Schroeder stated he would be willing to keep the access at 30 feet to accommodate th^ septic site and that now is the time to plat the access. f^.vn co> r.iented she has a problem with granting variances to septic systems in a new 4iive»ft£-rient. Gaffron stated the septic inspector is authorized to grant an administrative variance if he determines it to be appropriate. Steve Koehler, a resident in Crystal Creek Subdivision, commented he is in favor of this proposal and would rather not see the back lot served by Crystal Creek Road. Koehler inquired whether the minutes could reflect the Planning Commission's desire to have the second possible back lot serviced from the 30 foot access road. Smith commented in her opinion It is not up to this Planning Commission to determine that. Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Appiication #2466, 3020 Watertown Road, permitting a Class II Subdivision as outlined in City Staffs March 2,1999 memorandum, subject to a 30 foot outlet being platted to permit access to the flat lot (Lot 2), and further subject to City Staff review and approvai of a satisfactory septic system and grading and Page 15 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2466 Jam«t Renckens, continued) drainage plan. This approval is based on the understanding that if the septic system is not approved, then this application will be denied. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#10) #2467 BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 1025 BROWN ROAD SOUTH. CLASS III SUBDIVISION, 10:28 p.m. -11:02 p.m. Steve Bohland, Bohland Development, was present. Van Zomeren stated the Applicant is proposing to subdivide a 45.1 acre parcel lying between Wiilow Drive South and Brown Road South into six parcels for a single family residential development. This parcel is currently zoned RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential, with a two acre minimum requirement. Van Zomeren commented that the wetland setback is an issue and may lequire a variance to grade or fill within 26 feet of the wetland. The subdivision will also require a conditional use permit for grading within five feet of the property line to create a driveway for Lot 1. Currently there are three tax parcels on this property, with a 50 by 200 foot strip of wetland along the east property line of the proposed subdivision being tax-forfeited in 1982 to the State of Minnesota. It was subsequently conveyed to the City of Orono for drainage purposes. Van Zomeren commented that City Staff does not feel this land is needed by the City and the parcel could be made available to the Applicant with the entire wetland area west of Brown Road South being included in a conservation and flowage easement agreement. Van Zomeren indicated that Lot 1 is the largest parcel with 20.8 acres total, with 5.7 acres dry buildable. Access is being proposed off of King Street, which will prevent this lot from being further subdivided. Lot 2 is a 9.3 acre parcel with 3.6 acres dry buildable; Lot 3 is 4.4 acres with 2 acres dry buildable; Lot 4 is technically considered a through lot because it has potential access from Brown Road; Lot 5 is proposed to be 2.4 acres with 2 acres dry buildable; and Lot 6 is proposed to be two acres of dry buildable land. In this proposal Lots 2, 3,4. 5. and 6 will all have access off of a new private road from Willow Drive South. Lots 2, 5. and 6 have frontage on Willow Drive and access will not be allowed from these lots directly to Willow Drive. Lots 1 and 4 also have possible access to Brown Road, with Lot 4 not being allowed to have a driveway curb cut on Brown Road. Access to Lot 1 shall be from King Street. Van Zomeren stated the issues left to be resolved include the number of outlots that should be created, curb cuts, the stormwater management plan, and septic. Chair Smith inquired whether this was a sketch plan or a formal application before the Planning Commission. Van Zomeren stated this is a formal application and that a sketch plan review was previously held on this development. McMillan stated she has concerns regarding access off of King Street and that it might be more approp.'^ate to have an arrangement with the adjoining neighbor regarding access. Van Zomeren commented that the proposed preliminary plat has been sent to Wally Case, DSU landscape architect, for his review. The Park Commission had requested land for a buffer strip along Willow Drive to plant trees for screening of the houses from the road. However, Staff does not recommend that tne City accept land for tree planting, because the subdivision ordinance does Page 16 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2467 Bohland Development, continued) provide for the City to require buffering for shade trees every 40 feet. Van Zomeren stated Staff would like to have the landscape architect offer suggestions on how this buffer could best be achieved and meet the ordinance requirements as far as buffering, setbacks, and erosion control. Bohland commented they are proposing to construct a 12 foot wide driveway. Smith noted that a conditional use permit is required for grading within five feet of the property line and that the septic sites for Lot 5 will require an administrative variance. Van Zomeren stated that the septic site will be moved slightly which vnll eliminate the need for a variance. The Applicant will be required to submit a grading and drainage plan for review and approval by City Staff. The landscape architect commented that the southern part of the site, which is an open field with trees along the fence line, would be improved by the addition of shade trees. Mr. Case also suggests that the rear yard of Lot 4 along Brown Road and both sides of Carriage Road be planted with trees every 50 feet along the right-of-way. Van Zomeren stated Lot 2, which is a flag lot, will require approximately 150 feet of driveway, and Mr. Case has recommended that a buffer along that strip of driveway be considered. Van Zomeren remarked that the issues before the Planning Commission are access off of King Street, whether Lot 2 should be served by an outlet rather than a cul-de-sac, and then incorporation of the City Engineer's comments as far as grading and drainage and utility easements are concerned. McMillan inquired what the grade of the proposed driveway would be off of Willow. Bohland stated they are proposing a two percent grade down at the bottom and a 5.2 percent grade to the site, with another two percent grade at the end of the cul-de-sac. Van Zomeren stated that eight percent is preferred, but the City would allow a ten percent grade. Bohland commented regarding the setback to the wetland, they are proposing to construct a retaining wall in that area in order to meet the 26 feet setback requirement. Bohland stated there is a 10 to 1 bench on the stormwater drainage pond. Hawn inquired whether the retaining wall near King Street will remain. Bohland stated that retaining wail will remain. Bohland commented that putting two driveways side by side for access is not desirable and a better approach might be to add on six to eight feet to the driveway and then split the road where the topography begins to drop down, which should provide safe access out to Brown Road. Hawn inquired whether the driveway would be narrowed after the split. Bohland stated the driveway would be narrowed down to approximately 12 feet wide after the split, which should allow passage for two cars. Hawn inquired how long the driveway will be after it is split until it winds up at the residence. Bohland stated he would guess approximately 300 feet. Smith stated the issues before the Planning Commission are a conditional use permit for grading Page 17 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (#2467 Bohland Development, continued) within five feet of the property *ine to create a driveway for Lot 1, a variance to grade within 26 feet of the wetiand, and a variance to the septic sites on Lot 5. Van Zomeren remarked that what the developer is now proposing will not require a variance to the wetland setback or to the septic sites for Lot 5. Lindquist inquired whether the Planning Commission needs to determine which is the front lot and which is the back lot for Lot 2. Gaffron remarked that the line that says Outlet B. that is the front yard setback, but Staff would rather have it designated it as a side yard. Van Zomeren inquired whether the outlet is acceptable off of the cukJe-sac to serve Lot 2. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the outlet would be acceptable. There were no public comments. Lindquist moved, McMilian seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2467,1025 Brown Road South, Class III Subdivision, to allow a conditional use permit for grading within five feet of the property iine, to identify a front iot/back iot on Lot 2 as shown in the diagram, subject to the recommendations outiined in the Landscape Architect's memorandum of March 14,1999, and further subject to the right-of-way being from Brown Road south to King Street, and access for Lots 5 and 6 be prior to the cul-de-sac. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#11) #2468 BRUCE AND BETSY NUSBAUM, 3480 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES, 11:03 p.m.-11:37 p.m. Bruce and Betsy Nusbaum, Applicants, were present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are proposing to remove the existing residence located on the lot and construct a two-story house. The existing residence is a non-conforming structure as it is located on an undersized lot and encroaches into the required side yard setback. The house is located on a lot line. The new proposed structure would be placed to meet all required setback. Weinberger commented this property is located in the LR-1C district. One Family Lakeshore Residential District, which has a minimum of half an acre. This iot is comprised of approximately .22 acres. Weinberger stated at the rear of the property line there is located a two-car garage with an attached lean-to structure. The Applicants are proposing to retain that existing structure. Typically the zoning code does not allow any accessory structures to remain on a lot without a principal building, and the Applicants are requesting a variance to allow this structure to remain on the property during construction. Weinberger remarked the proposed addition would raise the total structure above the allowed coverage for the lot for a total of 20.49 percent. The zoning code presently allows a maximum of 15 percent In structural coverage. Currently existing on the property Is hardcover in the amount of 2,965 square feet, or 45 percent, and this proposal will reduce hardcover to 2,247 square feet, which is a significant reduction in hardcover but the structural coverage will increase on the property. Page 18 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2468 Bruce and Betsy Nusbaum, continued) Weinberger stated the curb cut on Birch Lane is presentiy 44 square feet, which wiii be reduced to meet the maximum of 20 feet aiiowed by the City. The proposed iocation of the house is aiso beyond the 75 feet required for structure from the iakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. Weinberger stated due to the high water tabie on this property, a basement wiii not be supported, which does pose a hardship. Weinberger noted the Appiicants have expiored other options of adding on to the present structure but the present foundation does not support any addition. Nusbaum stated the garage buffered storm damage iast year and a new roof was put on the structure. Chair Smith noted that the Applicants are proposing to make significant reductions in the hardcover, but the Pianning Commission likes to see new structure conform to the 15 percent structurai coverage iimit whenever possible. Nusbaum commented that this pian has been revised once aiready to reduce hardcover and his architect has recommended this size of structure to keep the residence within the character of the rest of the neighborhood. Mrs. Nusbaum stated they wouid iike a house to comfortabiy accommodate a famiiy of four, noting that the present structure was at one time an oid cabin. Nusbaum commented they have looked at various options for this property in an effort to reduce hardcover. Chair Smith commented that the City is concerned about the possibie impact the hardcover wouid have on Lake Minnetonka and that structural coverage should be closer to the limit of 15 percent. Hawn indicated she was in agreement with Smith. Hawn suggested that perhaps the garage could be incorporated somehow with the house, but as the proposal is presentiy before the Planning Commis^on, she would not be able to approve the application due to the high structural coverage. Nusbaum requested the Planning Commission take into consideration the improvements they are proposing to make to the existing hardcover. Hawn commented that the Planning Commission needs to remain consistent on the 15 percent limit, noting that many applications of this type appear before the Planning Commission. Schroeder remarked that the City needs to protect Lake Minnetonka whenever possible. Chair Smith inquired whether there were any public comments. Jim Daly, 3458 North Shore Drive, commented that in his view this proposal is not excessive and the Appiicants should not be penalized for their small lot. Mrs. Nusbaum commented that they would like to reach some type of agreement on the structural coverage. Lindquist stated whenever new structure is being proposed, the Planning Commission likes to have the Applicants hold to the 15 percent structural coverage limit. McMillan suggested that since some major improvements to hardcover are being proposed, that perhaps some flexibility could be given on the structural coverage. Page 19 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 16,1999 (#2468 Bruce and Betsy Nusbaum, continued) Schroeder indicated he was in agreement with McMillan. Hawn remarked that this might not be consistent with what the Planning Commission has done on previous applications. Weinberger suggested that perhaps the Applicants look at constructing a two and a half story house to help reduce structural coverage. Mrs. Nusbaum indicated they would be willing to reduce the size of the garage. McMillan indicated she would be willing to consider keeping the structural coverage for the residence as proposed if the garage is reduced. Schroeder commented he would be wilting to approve the 16.8 percent structural coverage given the other reductions the Applicants are making to the hardcover. Hawn expressed concern that this might be setting a dangerous precedent. Schroeder moved to recommend approval of Application #2468,3480 North Shore Drive. McMillan inquired if the Applicants do reduce the size of the garage, would it need to appear before the Planning Commission again. Smith stated in her view it appears this application would be denied as presented, noting that the Planning Commission would like to see structural coverage reduced. Smith inquired whether the Applicants would like this application to be tabled at this time to allow them additional time to revise their plans or whether the Planning Commission should act on this application tonight. Mrs. Nusbaum inquired what the Planning Commission would like to see as far as structural coverage. Lindquist commented the Applicants will need to hold to the 15 percent structural coverage in order for him to approve this application. Schroeder withdrew his earlier motion. Schroeder moved, Smith seconded, to table Application #2468,3480 North Shore Drive, to allow the Applicants time to submit revised plans. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#12) #2471 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #278,685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 11:38 p.m. -12:05 p.m. Neil Lawson, Assistant Superintendent, was present. George Gorbatenko, Wold Architects, was present. Van Zomeren stated the Orono independent School District #278 is proposing to construct a new middle school and a new site circulation plan for the Orono High School. The middle school will serve 875 students in grades 8-8. The school building will include a gymnasium, cafeteria, lecture room and media center and wili consist of approximately 115,000 square feet and be two stories in height. Page 20 ORONO PLANNINO COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (#2471 Independent School District, continued) Van Zomeren stated this application will require the City to vacate easements across Outlot A, with the School District being required to legally combine the separate tax parcels. The School District will also need to obtain a land alteration permit to grade the site. The Applicant has applied to the Watershed District to obtain the necessary permits due to the location of wetlands on the site. This application does meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and conforms to the minimum zoning requirements for a school in the RR-1B district. Van Zomeren stated the Applicant will need to submit a signage plan, noting that the City limits signage to 12 square feet, which will probably require a variance for this application. The School District is proposing to provide 121 parking spaces in the front of the building with 5 handicapped parking spaces for a total of 126 spaces, which meets the City's parking requirements. The proposal does include a bus parking area, which will provide an additional 100 parking spaces for other activities when buses are not using the lot. Van Zomeren stated the lighting plan has been submitted and is under review by the City's landscape architect. The athletic fields will not be illuminated. Van Zomeren stated the landscape architect has made some comments regarding the layout of the athletic fields as far as the afternoon and evening sun. A landscaping plan has also been provided and is under review by the landscape architect. Lawson expressed his gratitude to the City of Orono for their support and assistance in this project. Van Zomeren stated the buildir ^ inspector wiil need to verify the height of the buiiding to insure that it meets the City's requirements. Lindquist commented that approval could be given subject to review by the building inspector. Van Zomeren remarked that the lighting is a more significant issue. McMiiian inquired whether there was a connection to the student center. Lawson stated presently there Is a bike path to the student center. Hawn inquired whether the School District was aware of the comments by the landscape architect. Gorbatenko indicated they are aware of the comments by the landscape architect, but they are unable to change the configuration of the soccer field due to the wetlands. McMillan commented she would like City Staff to review the lighting plan. Gaffron noted that the student crossings have been limited to two points, and that the schools need to provide crossing lights. Lawson indicated that they have attempted to locate the student crossing at the high point of Crystal Bay Road for better sight lines. Lawson stated that it is not the Schooi District's intent to have the students cross during the school day. noting that the majority of the students utilizing the crossing will be high school students. There were no public comments. McMillan moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2471, Independent School District #278,685 Old Crystal Bay Road, granting of a conditional Page 21 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2471 Independent School District, continued) use permit, subject to the conditions outlined in City Staff's memorandum of March 15,1999, and further subject to review and approval by City Staff of a lighting plan, landscaping plan, parking and traffic circulation, and height restrictions of the building. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW (#13) #2463 GEORGE STICKNEY, ON BEHALF OF JOAN THOMPSON/RODNEY AND PAULA MINNICH, 250 AND 340 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD, 12:07 p.m. -12:11 p.m. George Stickney was present. Van Zomeren stated the Applicant is proposing to purchase two parcels, 250 and 430 Old Crystal Road, to combine them into a 20.2 acre site for an eight lot subdivision served by a private road terminating in a cul-de-sac. This parcel is zoned RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential, which has a two acre minimum. Van Zomeren indicated that the proposed subdivision can meet ail the standard lot requirements and the developer will need to identify the exact location of the lots for review and approval by City Staff. The sketch plan will also need to be reviewed by the City Engineer to addrens issues dealing with drainage, stormwater, and access. Stickney indicated that the lots are being platted wide enough to met the lot requirements and can be altered somewhat if there is a problem. Stickney indicated they are attempting to save as many trees as possible in this development. Stickney commented that the proposed septic sites have been perked and tested by Steve Weckman. Chair Smith inquired whether there were any public comments. Rod Minnich, 340 Old Crystal Bay Road, indicated he is in favor of the proposed plan and would like to see as many trees as possible be preserved. Chair Smith commented that it appears the developer is attempting to preserve those trees and they will remain largely untouched. McMillan suggested this plan be presented to the Parks Commission for their review regarding the iocation of the bike trail. There was no action taken by the Planning Commission on this application. (#14) #2469/2470 STEVEN AND JO WEBSTER, 500 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD - VARIANCES This application was tabled at the request of the Applicants. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#15) Report of Planning Commission Representatives Attending Council Meetings on February 22,1999, and March 8,1999 Page 22 r ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (Planning Commission Comments, continued) Hawn Indicated that she attended the February 22,1999 City Council meeting and no major issues arose. (#16) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION None (#17) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16.1999 AND JANUARY 19,1999 Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve the minutes of the February 16,1999 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve the minutes of the January 19,1999 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#18) SELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ON MARCH 22. 1999, AND APRIL 12,1999 March 22 - Smith April 12 - Lindquist ADJOURNMENT Schroeder moved, McMillan seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 12:19 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Sandra Smith, Chair COUNCIL MEETING APR 1 2 I9V> CITyOFOnu,,^ CITTtrfORONO Municipal Offices Strnt Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Gale R. Landberg 1545 Maple Place Mound MN 55364 Re: Adopt a Park Volunteer Recognition Dear Gale: The Orono City Council and Parks, Trails and Open Space Commission members greatly appreciate your willingness to volunteer for the Adopt a Park program. Your work to help maintain Sandy Beach is greatly appreciated. The Orono City Council and Park ’s Commission is planning to recognize all of the Adopt a Park Volunteers at the Monday April 26th City Council meeting. Certificates of appreciation will be presented to the volunteers at the beginning til'thr Council meeting. A reception with refreshments is scheduled from 6:30 to 7:00 p.m. before the Council meeting with the Council meeting starting at 7:00 p.m. Again thank you for your volunteer efforts to help maintain Orono City Parks. We hope to see you on Monday April 26th at 6:30 p.m. Smcerely, 4. A Gregdiy A Gappa Director of Public Services GAG/jlg cc: Mayor Jabbour and Orono Council Members Orono Parks, Open Spaces and Trails Commission Members Tdcphonc (412) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 s:i • if IrN -j i' I Prel iminary Plat Submission Dission Drawings for Carriage Hill Orooo, Mil. for Bohland DiBvelopinent, Inc. 4»UplHiLMt iMMnli t5M7 mb BoM : «I2-73MS05 ■■ www mmmt PwiiMiwiil ggmco. Inc. nuU^asiiSs mm irnKPI-ANi nAttKAom ncarro . UNPoirm^____MitMP ifilM. Kmr I I. I^A UC M3 Preliminary Plat Submission Dawinp^ ^ 1 Carriage Hill • Uraoo. A i ! I t. • ir *, % V rmCiU. LOT MTM. ■F»WNT 0 * U -MIN r«3NT SETBACK -SOC SETBACK -LOT NUMBE39 „ «ie»« «• .M«»«. •# ” ^?r*iT(r!*L** * -»-S . •nr*. c«WM t« •>« aOTt. •■•,«., , ^ ''•*<• •« H9 • j «MI. «w •> «< <M»«* _____ t>»m. « «MoK« .♦ rTftirm"Si —»9 mJ mLbSI*** AMNsroNi mfMCM L*.i memo >co^ i^r* 53 #ir-«<Tr2,Zr» («t • «M«M« at J43 02 •««. (h»» -i..» 44 tmJ-Zvr r r jT-JT^L-sr £r^vH~- 4,4.«« 04 «4^ 55 .■s,^r*cs CTtrjsrr tTS-rj:,-z;s£.r?rw^ tK44' «f»4 n«r«w'L4« 10. Vm* O M (IOWA «n -LOT AIHTA OR AIN ACE * UTIUTY (0 * U) CASEMENT LOT OMENStON ?bS!H«^ s»g-:Vj-gaSay ■OMLAMD DCVKXMflm. MC a*l*1AM»LAMB WTMDMnu—nift IM43 MOKCVTV (MMBN JilVa .M, N.tW0VlM. •« SftM,' orwiWA KML4M0 HVCLOA^IIT 420 UK1.AW lank PLONOUTH. MM MMY CAUUAiJCi PUUMMAftT HAT •OT) «CM ■** 'OH t H3NLAMO DrVBLaVMBCT. ML 4VUP1AHDUIMI ----' ntCUMMAltY 1 CJIIADINCDeTAa. 1•'. •?*■ •“ ■*■ •■*••CASSUflilRi. ▼r trS/L-’*****’. 0»l» tMu M l/*>*RTmm MMMKVTA «mct («MMl ^ MMUND nvmflPMeWT. MC cjmuMmwmx oauMUMi PIAKTWO PIAN I , - . i Irfri,