The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-16-1999 Planning PacketORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, August 16, 1999—6:30 p.m. 2780 Kelley Park>vay —Council Chambers AGENDA Council Representative: Mayor Jabbour AUDIENCE MEMBERS: Please sign in for the public record at the front podium if you wish to address the Planning Commission. Applicants will be asked to move to the front table to answer questions when the Chair announces the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for the September 13, 1999, City Council meeting unless otherwise noted by the Chair. NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS Review of these items will commence prior to or betw een scheduled public hearings. 1. 2.#2511 Todd Kimmis, 2102 Sugarwood Drive, Review for Special Consideration within Sugar Woods Plat. (Staff; Paul Weinberger). Douglas Whiteley, 60 Orono Orchard Road South, Conditional Use Permit. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:00 p.m. 3.#2510 Douglas Whiteley, Heidi Hust and David Hust, 60 Orono Orchard Road South and 45 Smith Avenue, Class I Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). 7:15 p.m. 4.#2512 Alan Richie and Marilyn Richie, 905 Tonkawa Road, Class III Subdivision. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). CONTINUED NEW BUSINESS; PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.#2506 6.#2508 7.#2509 Edward H. Hamm, 485 Orono Orchard Road South, Conditional Use Permit. (Staff; Paul Weinberger). James Erler, 3448 North Shore Drive, Variance. (Staff; Kris Jenson). Andrew' Ronningen, 3030 Casco Point Road, Variance. (Staff; Paul Weinberger). 8. 9.#2515 10.#2516 11.#2517 Connie Piepho, 540 North Arm Drive, Variances. (Staff: Kris Jenson). Tom and Maureen Palm, 1685 Concordia Street, Variances. (Staff; Kris Jenson). Jeff Martineau, 1420 Shoreline Drive, Variances. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). Scott and Lisa Bittman, 25 Brown Road South, Variances. (Staff: Kris Jenson). PLANNING COM^^SSION COMMENTS 12. Report of Planning Commission representatives attending Council meetings on July 26,1999 and August 9, 1999. 13. Other issues for discussion. 14. Planning Commission approval of minutes for July 19,1999. 15. Selection of representatives for City Council meetings on August 23,1999 and September 13,1999. ADJOURNMENT . I I '• aaoMMikii Public A ttendance Meeting D ate □ C ouncil Planning C ommission Park C ommission Other Please fill out the information REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER G'i'h )£1A - Tj\A^ A^^kU[7u^/^y<^r7c^>i/f/^ i^t44 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.. 11. 12.. 13. 14. 15.. ifUfM 2 ^ ^ MEMO CITY OF ORONO TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:August 12,1999 SUBJECT: Review for Special Consideration within the Sugar Woods Plat 2102 Sugarwoods Drive (Todd and Anita Kimmes) The City Council has approved a special review procedure for requests tliat do not meet the covenants and special zoning requirements within Sugar Woods. The Planning Commission assumes the sole responsibility for the review and final recommendation regarding requests for special consideration. The applicant however, does have the right to appeal a Planning Cotiimission decision to the City Council at their next available meeting. Please review the attached Supplemental Sheet to Building Permit Application for Residential Development within Sugar Woods (Exhibit G). Please pay special attention to paragraph 3 and Attachment B. Todd Kimmes has submitted a Building Permit application for Lot 2, Block 4 (2102 Sugarwoods Drive) for a new residence. The special conditions placed on the development require any improvements that occur on the property must do so within the required building setback. Setback requirements for this lot are fiont 50', rear 50' and side 30'. The proposed driveway is a hardcover improvement and would be required to meet the 30' setback by the approvals granted within the subdivision. Applicant is requesting a driveway 10' fi:om the side property line. Please review the attached letter submitted by the applicant explaining the special conditions that apply to the property (Exhibit D). Letters supporting the plan have been submitted by the adjacent property owner and the Architectural Committee of Sugar Woods. They are attached as Exhibits E and F. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve or deny the request for special consideration to allow a driveway to encroach 20’ into the required 30' side yard setback. Exhibits A B C D E F O Building Permit Application Plat Map of Sugar Woods Site Plan Applicant letter Letter from adjacent property owner ~ Robert L. Melamed (2104 Sugarwoods Drive) Letter from Sugar Woods Architectural Committee Supplemental Sheet to Building Permit Application for Residential Development within Sugar Woods and Attachments A and B • > 4 >. •c ••• •:...%. Total Fee: $, Entered By; Date Received: Permit ff: CITY OF ORONO - BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AH information must be submitted in full before plan review wiU be started. {please print all information) THE APPLICAiYT IS: {circle one) OWNER OR^ONTRACTOR JOB SITE ADDRESS: 2-\0Z G06Att, V/ooPS> Dr ZIP; NAME OF OWNER;PHONE: (home) (work) MAILING ADDRESS; ^Soa vJie^uliA CITY; ZIP; CONTRACTOR: UsCff Ci PHONE: MOBILE/PAGER: MAILING ADDRESS; I034e Vltoafe t>tt_ »iOS CITY; Pfejaatfe ZIP; SS344 STATE LICENSE; if ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: ARg^ue. MAILING ADDRESS: _________________ CITY: NAME; PHONE: ZIP; REGISTRATION TYPE OF WORK; New X __ Move Remodel/Alteration Addition Accessory Stmcture Land Alteration PROPOSED WORK {describe in detaiD r-ti^\Ai trA.witty STORIES: Z SQ. FEETOFEACH FLOOR^IL iBTsYKoin Zi^lYufper ITl^ NO. OF BEDROOMS: GARAGE STALLS: A^. PET. A ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION (excluding land); $ CogOjOOQ I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that the information above is conq>lete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of die City and with the State Building Code; that I understand this is not a permit and work is not to start without a permit; and that the work will be in accordance witE^e approved plan. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE:^ DATC= •7-/S-9V NOTE! Parade of Homes evenff require^parate permit approval by Police Department and City Council 60 days prior to the event. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. •• •••* t6) * \ •V.A,•CvS^ N • i< 1 »\5 r. V / V- % ^ l». II •; \ |»f M»*i ;tt*>«. 7'T*‘ “ 1 I f*.il ^ j ,. ,: . !lii;')|*iM*3P4fr*'' • • (2-1^'IS > ♦ • ’ 4— ■«• ••#. • • J •'■fC;;’: - <• • A • t.y S I ».y « • s • •••• fol.ai - fi ! 111^ or (12) 6 "isKsr — K (10) r».ot<4. ij..v; (29) I SwBJSCT/^vy ^or Z (22) •• (23) S *••••.•■ •! 2 i 51 i- t. \ ■/ m y. v« 11.4! ! V*’r •• ^a i t«i t oiaai • Ik^jI:/ 'M/T vT'4 V/ M--*.oir. nt 1 ^ 'kiI ■■i ■ \m 'I 4<yriMH 9^ • •• ; ' tv- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2. . Block 4, SUGAR WOODS Hennepin County. Minnesota. Adjdctnt Houm LOT I AREAS Lot-5A,04J Square feet Houae/Garage^S.442 Sqvorc Feet more of hee 1J course Proposed goroge floor elev.m r Proposed top of foundation «f«K» loitr. 53 Proposed lowest floor elev.w ' tovttUJlotS.U BEHOiUARK: -Top of Iron pipe marked *BM*. Demtlon- fPt$. SS . . i'' ... •• * o Denotes iron monument • Denotes offset stoke \ . X OOO.ODenotes esisthg elev.' \ I : ^ ’ ^ \ *(000.0) Denotes proposed etey. ------ Oonotos «urfaeo droktoge... , SCtStD: 1-30-W S^lg^f-ts~es m«l OMi ,.V DEUAFS-CABRIEL LAND SURVEYOBS, mC XSO H^Ur U m« Ma H/mIA. MN 59447 PhmmtSiS) 55#-0f0i ta 5i#-0479 r CiftMy IA«t IMt li • vtd MrrMi n^rmmtoVon 9 m^y •# 10400-fl CERIVKAIE or SURVEY «i|i wt m 99tS hnO emJ£2iis„ wJHidL— i»ay Or ^ LECY CONSTRUCTIONSah OmU C Mlw. It«f. »4f4 fmxr 4 me. •./ • .1 i niT*€«f^?:3ir?iT7riiiTXtjjMij •lull IHiii TWXtJ •:«ict rTOiirrnEnHi^ WlK •\VjH •:o<ti • iWtw rtiir-Ni iO]n JTMl^rFiT.K: LAKEWOOD DEVELOPMENT INC. E 2354 WEST WAYZATA BOULEVARD, LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA 55356 (612) 473-2588 • FAX (612) 476-0465 LICENSE NO. 000 7233 ! City of Orono Planning Commission PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Li*. I * ^ Ladies and Gentlemen: At the request of Todd Kimmes, owner of 2102 Sugarwoods Drive, and as the neighboring property owner at 2104 Sugarwoods Drive, I have been asked to review his plan and request for variance to permit construction of a home that would have a side loaded garage on the west side of his home wdiereby he would be requesting a side yard variance to permit construction of his driveway to within 12 feet of &e west property line. In light of the numerous variances that have been granted in Sugarwoods to permit side loaded garages, and due to the narrow pie-shaped portion of the lot near the road, and more particularly because of two large trees that would have to be destroyed if the home were moved any further east, as the owner of 2104,1 hereby advise the city that I find his plan to be the best acceptable solution for a side loaded garage and I would not challenge your granting him a variance to proceed thusly. Thank you very much. • ^ Sincerely yours, .4 ! Robert L. Melamed President, Lakewood Development, Inc. RLMtmgl Cc: Todd Kimmes August 4,1999 FROM: Jay Graf This is to inform you that the Architectural Committee of the Sugar Woods Homeowners Association has approved the submitted plans for the Kimmes le witti the following conditions:iWii 1. That Mr. Kimmes must submit a waiver to the Orono Plamiing Commission from Lakewood Properties, the owner of Lot 3, Block 4 for the driveway encroachment into the setback 2. That the driveway alignment conform to Sugar Woods and City of Orono covenants A. Jtty Graf, Sugar W ident omeowners Associati SOPPLEMBNTAL SHEET TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OP SUGAR WOODS SUBDIVISION ■ *• • In addition to the plansr specifications and information reouested in the Orono Building Permit Application packet, the following is required by special resolution of the Orono City Council of all applicants seeking to obtain a building permit within the Sugar Woods subdivision: Your site plan must designate the Specific Building Setback Area for your lot. , ^ . A) front 50'r rear 50' and side 40' for Lots 1 through 4, Block 1; and B) front 50', rear 50' and side 30' for all other lots in Blocks 1, 2, 3 and 4. 2, Per Orono resolution #2652, each lot shall be served by a single driveway/one curb cut at a 20' maoc imum allowed wxdth. The driveway width shall be measured parallel to the loop road, Sugarwood Drive. The portion of the drive located within the front/street setback area shall be placed in a straight alignment from the loop road and shall not be curved. 3. An inventory of all hardcover on the lot must accompany each application (see worksheet attached. Attachment A). All hardcover improvements on each lot shall be within the., building pad defined as that portion of the lot that is not within the building setback area (exception: the driveway leading to Sugarwoods Drive located within the front building setback area, retaining walls and similar land scaping structures that may be built within the front building setback area). The hardcover improvements for each lot shall not exceed 80% of the area of the building pad for each lot. The hardcover areas of each lot shall include the surface area on the ground of each of the following improvements on the lot (the inventory shall include allowed * improvements within the front/street setback area): A) Footprint of each and every structural improvement on the lot, including each house, garage,.accessory , building, porch and covered walkway; .. . ' B) All wooden decks and boardwalks regardless of the spacing between the planks on the surface; C) All driveways and parking areas that are paved or graveled; E) All walkways and patios that are covered with asphalt, concrete, paving blocks (regardless of the space in between the blocks), or covered with gravel, rock or woodchips upon an underliner (whether the underliner is impervious or not), but not those walkways that are dirt, grass or gravel, rock or woodchips without an underliner; 5. 6. 7. Tv and every landscaped area wit' an under liner (whether the underliner is impervxous or not), regardless of whether the area is covered with woodchips, stones, dirt or plants; G) Any swimming pool or wading pool; H) Any tennis court covered with concrete, asphalt or clay, but not any tennis court covered with grass. Itot Coverage. Per Ordxnance 80, 2nd Series adopted February 26, 1990, the. total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the 1 acre average density at'T6,534 sf. The following shall be included in calculation of "lot coverage by structures: a) b) roofed structures which extend more than 6’ above grade level; tennis courts, patios, decks and all similar open structures^ when partially or fully enclosed by raxlings or walls which extend more than 6' above grade level ( if any portion-of such structure extends more than 6' above grade level, the entire structure shall count towards lot coverage); c) pools, including pool basin and associated deck or patio areas, regardless of whether such pool basin, deck or patio is enclosed with a fence. All lots shall be provided with a functional meams or method of backing out. The City will not approve the backing out of motorized vehicles- onto Sugarwood Drive* For all applicants who find they cannot meet the required standards for development within the Sugar Hoods Planned Residential Development, please refer to Attachment B for special directions. Written confirmation from Rebers Construction that the building plans and site plan have been approved by the Architectural Review Committee for Sugar Woods. At the time a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a new dwelling within the subdivision of Sugar Woods, the City has agreed to execute and deliver to the owner of each lot a partial release of subdivider's agreement for that lot. Upon the recordation of such partial release of subdivider's agreement, the Registrar of Titles is authorized and instructed to remove from the Certificate of Title for the lot, the memorial of this instrument and the memorial of the partial release of subdivider's agreement. Please contact the Building and Zoning Department (473-7357) if you have any questions concerning the directives listed above. Prior %o any site preparation, tree cuttincr. land alterations or construction, the Buifginq~~§etback Area must3e defined on~the site with plastic or wooden snow fencing. This fencing must remain on the site until a representative of the Oropo Building Department provides wrTtEen confirmatiopPthat fencing may be removed. • / HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET Attachment A Proposed Hardcover - a. House length width b. Garage X X c. Driveway (Include area within front setback area) d• Sidewalk X X e. Patio/ Deck/Pool/ Pond X X X f. Landscape areas underlain with pervious or impervious sheeting/__________ x ______ fabric X g. Other X X X total hardcover Lot Area s.f, - Building Pad Area Building Setback Area s.f • Allowed Hardcover s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. Safe s«£ • s • £ • s • £ • Se£e 8 • £ • 8 • £ • St£a 8 • £ • 8«£e 8 • £ • 8 • £ • 8 • £ • 8 • £ e 8e£. s •£• Building Pad Area Sa£e X 80%s.f. V' • • # REVIEW PROCEDURE FOR ALL APPLICANTS unable to meet special requirements FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SUGAR WOODS PLAT Attachment B All owners' or builders' seeking special consideration must submit a written request to the Zoning Administrator 7 days before the official Planning Commission meeting for the month (thira Monaay of the month)* The City Council of Orono has approved an atmreviated. review process for ail such request whereby the Planning Commission shall assume the sole responsibility for the review and final recommendation regarding these special requests. Each applicant shall have the right of appeal be' ._-e the Council of all decisions of the Planning Commission. All appeals to the Council shall be placed on the Council agendas for the following Monday (fourth Monday of the month). Applicants may find that the strict enforcement of these special requirements for residential, development to not be practical nor functional when certain site conditions are found within a building lot. The following site conditions are listed below as examples to assist applicants in the preparation of their specific request: 1. the shape or limited area of a building envelope; 2. unique or. mature trees within a building envelope or front/street setback area; 3.. the topography of a building envelope; 4. desire to place house within a building pad so as to minimize impact on adjacent properties. All special requests shall consist either of one or more of the following submittals, depending upon the specific site conditions to be considered: 1. • survey/site plan designating structures, pathways, drives and type of back out Improvement; 2. Inventory of hardcover (be sure to Include all hardcover within’ front street/street setback area); 3. topographic mapping of property; 4. location of mature, unique tree specimens;- 5. other unique physical characteristics of property that requires special placement of house/drive on site. (u) TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planncr DATE:August 11,1999 SUBJECT: #2511 Douglas and Claudia Whiteley 60 Orono Orchard Road Conditional Use Pennit for Accessory Building on a through lot 2U>ning District:RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre) Lot Area: (Existing)60 Orono Orchard Road 55,862.6 s.f. Exhibits A B C D E Application Lo^on Map Plat Map Reduced Survey Property Owners List m Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.02 - Definition (42) Lot-Through (A lot which has a pair of opposite lot lines abutting two substantially parallel streets, and >^ch is not a comer lot. On a through lot, both street lines shall be fix>nt lot lines for {q>plying the Zoning Chapter.) Section 10.28 - One Family Rural Residential Zoning District Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 — All accessory buildings on through lots located in "R" Districts shall require a conditional use pennit. Summary of Request The Whiteley's have applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit for an accessory building on a through lot. They intend to remove the existing detached garage located on the lot and build a new garage located nearer to the center of the lot. CUPs are required for through lots to ensure the development is consistant with the sunounding properties and an accessory building is not located to detract from areas that may be assumed as fi*ont yard areas, or having the building located in an area that may obstruct views. §35 n WhlttUy ConMonat Uu Ptmit 8/l«/99 i The proposed location of the accessory building is would not appear to detract from adjacent properties. As a matter of fact the garage would be located further ^m Orono Orchard Road. The Whiteley's do not intend to change access to the property with the new structure. The applicants have not submitted elevation views of the garage, but it is assumed the building would not require a height variance. If a height variance is needed the applicants are advised the application would be required to be amended. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the conditional use permit to allow the applicants to construct a detached garage on a through lot based on the location shown on the site survey submitted by die applicant and the existing garage will be removed upon completion o^the new building. §2Sn WhtuUy CimdUUmat Uu Ftmtt 8/16/99 Pagi2 A * Application # Date Keceived32ilZ^3Z AmountPaid Q /7iS"^^ cmr OF ORONO - general land use application • • • # • * • PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address /CcA^ . Type of Application to be Filed___ Property Identification Number (P.ID.) -£>£>7-3 APPLICANJ Name Address /c^, City Phone niQme>C?/>7 Phone fworlcl C*-^ >7 ~ S>^o^o Zip <53-*?/ OWNER Of different than applicant) Name ____________________ Phone (home). Phone (work). Address City Zip. . Date Property Acquired__ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PEES p CONDmpNAL USE PERMITS - $ 75.00 For each variwce request.with CUP application _ _ __ __ _ ^ ---- A A ^ m m A mm m (month^ear) nr $175.00 Residential Accessory Use ____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $225.00 Guest Hous^Guest Apartments ■ _ $200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _ $300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use ~ $250.00 Land Alteration ”____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more " Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore _ PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change fi’om origmal application). ” After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current .^plication Fee • fH OTHER APPLICATIONS _____^ $250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) ______$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation _____ $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision ______ $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ■_____ $350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____ $100.00 Appeals ' • Other • see Fee Schedule * I— rw^ • « ,f LAKE RD mi 600 V7.W *^(5>dvr-fi T > XVI itardM B n^n1?^.=S- : I WOOD HILL AVE wn'i. OI^LtQ m lUiliA' VWjV¥h FERNDALE | RO 7.*f3 3S-ni-<a^3s, % 1^ 0 0A~U7-S3-<^ ■'^(18) ONO GOL (UNPLATTED) COURSE D9- ••••• •* .* V »7 S' t ‘ S •»*••• • •.*#%#•■•. • . ' * . • • • • . •' ‘*'4 •• • ■ • . * i* * I . • • • ; • — • • 1 •• • • • ‘i: . V « - . ••••.. .. .*•: i •• ^ • • • • • . • .. j • ■ ........................ . • • b • ••••■■ •..'I '■ t- • ; .'1'; •••'. i' •• ... =v ’ A • :? •• ■ •- • . • . * • ... ■.. • " •I •».. *. .. • • • \v Ns: • •**••• •• • • -• ‘*1-.. • * — . . •*• •• •••• ••• . V.• . ;i . • . .. % • • i 4* • • •_____'____ ’• ,U •• • . '•V- • V>V ' ■ ■ ^^*^5sL m1» v a r t I I __^ ' i — # •fV> •• .. - " -Jsii ji - |. r = ■•■ •••• ‘ i \ »/ '»•.’ .-ffilHg.-.; 5l,„ tjlgitCTl * <. ^ . I I •. f •••■ I • •. # , U ’ • •. ’• j • • • # .*• 11 .• I f .. ».•*, - • S ’ • * I • • . yi ^t4 . ^ \ ,4 - - m . .ia:.*'• > • / * . • -L» • . b/ • . ;••.;■» .-V . /;* .. -ft " ^8^ . / /I . *y • r.-’.v. /V .. • >«» ^ ■••Ve:.- ... ...'!*• -V V ' •• / V %V^ ® •' u • - ! "^X** • . . .* • • » :■ -OJ' y*r .1/^ • .;•• •'. • •*,. /.. /V • JW. •\ ■/ ’ * I ••., ••» ••• •• . ••.■•.. .• \-....__* ._ JL1±_______kl__^^^_____V_L!_^_______•__________________._____._______^__.__*___________1________ . ? •I 4 • t * • •% V . ^. ^ #• .;/. •■.•••:■. ••■<• . • .•’.. •■• •• ♦ #. . • * • • •^ • • I r -j.sf. :?r<; •:■.*»•. /f»t -1.. ..i.CL v^.- . *• • /tf.*.? •• • •*** .* • .V J»J4 * * ,.•*♦•• ' ^ • HI * «• • • i , * ♦• • . . .^1••■ * '. . ' ' ■ ■rl . • ’ • •.**., .. . • • *’• • • il •« .. ' N 1 ? o>** * • ••-••».. t * • •- « • * •■JN ••.• • * * - • -• •* . ... II-.* • - "I gPv'*7 ‘ '■ ‘ ‘ '. V- IV-' ■ • *• ^ \'"-' .• .'. •.* ••• • :\S^ . . ..•■• \v>- ••• ••• . ■ ....... •.•• •. \: , • •.*. •• . • :•.••■• •• ; ;: . 'v V ^ • . ‘ . 4 % * *• *• • • • I : I'• * 1 ■\ . • • • ’ • •.'•••'••'. .• • ' '. ■« • '■• jI • . • • ‘ . •• ' . *j • * • I Cv • / .*•• I • « * * N Jlk I • iUN PATI i7/21/ff BATCH Sn PROP AODR ONHCR NAHC TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR -M P2-U7*2S 21 1002 00040 snXTH AVE T E 0 J HOOTCH .THOHAS E I JOANNE. H HITCH 40 SHXTH AVE HAYXATA HN 55591 PROP AODR QMNER NANE TAXPAYER HfHE/AODR 58 02*117*25 21 OOU 00115 SHITH AVE CRAie HERTZENBERO ETAL CRAie HERTZENBERO 115 SHITH AVE HAYZATA HN 55591 ■ 58 02-117-25 21 0025 PROP AODR OOOAO ORONO ORCHARD RO 5 OWOR NAHE DOUGLAS E HHITELEY ET AL . TAXPAYER * DOUGLAS E HHITELEY 8 • NAHE/ADDR CUUDIA HVERS-NHITELEY ' . 40 ORONO ORCHARD RO . s HAYZATA HN 55591 PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER HAHE/AODR 58 02-117-25 21 0052 00100 ORONO orchard RD S P S GOSHOARIAN ET AL PETER S OOSHGARIAN any GOSHOARIAN 100 ORONO ORCHARD RD S * HAYZATA HN 55591 PROP AODR OHNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 58 02-117-25 22 0002 00015 ORONO ORCHARD RO S P L SCHERER AGO SCHERER PETER L I GERl 0 SCHERER 19090 SIST PL N PLYHOUTH HN 55447 ■ PROP AODR ; OHNER NANE TAXPAYER ’ , NAHE/ADDR 58 02-117-25 22 0005 00245 ' OROIR) ORCHARD RD S VILUGE OP ORONO CITY OP ORONO P 0 BOX 44 CRYSTAL 8AY HN 55525 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY IHPORHAtlON SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST- 58 02-117-25 21 0005 00040 SHITH AVE VIOLET H OLAHPE TRUSTEE VIOLET H 6LAHPE 40 SHITH AVE ■ ' HAYZATA HN 55591 58 02-117-25 21 0017 00125 SHITH AVE B J 8 P J HORNER BRADLEY J 8 PAHEU J HOMER 125 SHITH AVE HAYZATA HN 55591 58 02-117-25 21 0024 00110 SHITH AVE J A.PISK 8 J K PISK JAHES A 8 JEttOPER X FISK 110 SHITH AVE HAYZATA m 55591 58 02-117-25 21 0055 ' 00120 ORONO ORCHARD RD S LOUIS 0 HERCHANT 8 WIFE LOUIS 0 HERCHANT 120 ORONO ORCHARD RO S HAYZATA HN 55591 58 02-117-25 22 0005 00058 ■ ADDRESS UNASSICNED CARGILL HAC NILLAN JR ETAL L0N6R1DGE ASSOCIATES P O BOX 9500 DEPT 28 HPLS HN 55440 58 02-117-25 22 0008 00045 StOTH AVE \ D H 8 H R HUST DAVID H 8 ISIDl R HUST 45 SHITH AVE HAYZATA HN 55591 /. • REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1 58 02-117-23 21 0004 . 00080 SHITH AVE JANET A HCHILLAH JANET A HCHILLAN 1274 TEALHOOD AVE LONG LAKE HN 55554 58 02-117-25 21 0022 00110 ORONO ORCHARD RD S J L HYPPELS 8 H J HYFFELS JAHES L 8 HAUDE J HYPPELS 110 ORONO ORCHARD RO S HAYZATA HN 55591 58 02-117-25 21 0051 ‘ 00095 SHITH AVE J 8 D AHLBERO JAHES H 8 DIANNE R AHLBERO 95 SHITH AVE HAYZATA HN 55591 58 02-117-25 22 0001 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE OF NINN STATE OF HINN IDHRI (LUCE LINE TRAILl 58 02-117-25 22 0004 00058 ADDRESS UNASSICNED STATE OP HINN STATE OF HINN (DNR) (LUCE LINE TRAIL) 38 55-118-25 55 0004 00025 ORONO ORCHARD RD N K J 8 T B SPENCER Keith j t theresa b spencer 25 ORONO ORCHARD RO N LONG LAKE HN 55554 m fr • • • ■. . • \ • 0. rn MtM DATE •7/il/ff • • ■ATCN Sfi * 38 SS~118<23 S3 tllfi PROf AODR MtSS ’ MNMESS UNASSIGNCO OMNER NAUR STATE OP tUNN TAXPAYER STATE OP NlfM (DNR> . NAHE/A1»R. ILUCE UNE TRAIL) 38 SB-118-23 34 8882 888S8 ADDRESS UNASSXGNEO OMNER NAME STATE OP HINN TAXPAYER STATE OF HUM fONR) (LUCE LINE TRAIL) PROP AODR MINER NAM TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 1.. • • IL • • A c. 1 I . i L HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORHATION SYSTEM . PROPERTY OWNERS LIST •. • REPORT NO. PZ43S481 PAGE 2 SO SS-118-2S 3S 8889 888E8 ORONO ORCHARD RD N OLD ORCHARD'EARN LLC OLD ORCHARD EARN LLC 38 ORONO ORCNARD RD HAYZATA HN BBS91 38 SS-118-2S S3'8818 . 888S8 ORONO ORCHARD RD N J L MURPHY 8 S S SMITH JAMES MURPHY 8 SANDRA SMITH S8 ORONO ORCHARD RD N WAYZATA HN EBS91 TOTAL BATCH «81 88822 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCIMATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OP XNFORNATION AS XT APPEARS TNXS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY KNOHLEDGE AND RELIEF. DATE m, 4.. i 3 • • • • • 3 jt 8 • ^ I 4 • • TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:August 11,1999 SUBJECT: #2510 Douglas and Claudia Whiteley David and Heidi Hust 60 Orono Orchard Road/4S Smith Avenue Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Class I Subdivision 21oning District:RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre) Lot Area: (Existing)60 Orono Orchard Road 45 Smith Avenue 55,862.6 s.f. 52,350.2 s.f. Summary of Request: The applicants are owners of two properties located at 60 Orono Orchard Road 45 Smith Avenue. They have proposed a Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement between the lots that results in two substandard lots. It is the intent of the applicants to gain an additional 17’ of frontage along Orono Orchard Road to allow for an addition of living space to the home. The lot^e rearrangement would involve a land swap of approximately 2,500 s.f. of land from each property to the other. Please refer to the enclosed survey illustrating the existing and proposed lot arrangement. Both properties are part of the Orono Orchard sewer expansion this year. Septic testing and setbacks are not an issue for either property. Lot 60 Orono Orchard Road 45 Smith Avenue F.iigring Lot Sixe Proposed Lot Size 55,862.6 s.f. 55,807.3 s.f. 52,350.2 s.f. 52,405.5 s.f. Both lots would remain approximately the same size euid each lot would have increased frontage along the front lot line. §2510 Whiulty/Hust Lot Unt JUammgtmtnt a/i6/99 Pagt 1 4 F Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.28 RR-IB One Family Rural Residential Dbtrict Lot Area 2 acres T.ot Arftfl and Yards ^ Orono Orchard Road Lot Front Side Rear Width Yard Yard Yard 200 feet 50 feet 30 feet 50 feet Existing Lot Size 55,862.6 s.f. Lot Width (front) 210 feet Lot Width (rear) 182 feet Structure Setback (side) 28.5 feet Proposed Lot Size 55.807.3 s.f. Lot Width (front) 227 feet Lot Width (rear) • 164 feet Structure Setback (side) 43 feet 'i 45 Smith Avenue Existing Lot Size 52,350.2 s.f. Lot Width (front) 161.0 feet Lot Width (rear) 191.5 feet Structure Setback (side) 58.7 feet Proposed Lot Size 52405.5 s.f. Lot Width (front) 178.0 feet Lot Width (rear) 174.5 feet Structure Setback (side) 75.5 feet Lots in the RR-IB district are required to be 200* wide at the front yard setback. Each lot would increase 17' in width should the subdivision be approved. The impact on the rear property width would be minimal with each lot only losing 17* in width at the rear. §2510 WhtuUyfHuU Lot Lbm Raanmtumnt 8/16W Fttfil STAFF RECOMMF.NDATION Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rearrangement as proposed based on the following conditions: 1.Applicant shall dedicate drainage and utility easement along new property lines and vacate any drainage and utility easements along the old property line. 2. Applicant shall provide to the City any documentation relating to easements on both properties. 3.Prior to City Council review 3 original surveys of the survey completed by a licensed surveyor in the State of Minnesota shall be submitted, with signature blocks. Attachments A B C D E F G H Application Location Map Section Map Plat Map Reduced Survey Site Topography Sewer Project Map Property Owners List . • ■1 §2510 WMttlty/Hust Lot Lbtt Rtarrangtmtnt VIO/99 fagii i 2SI0Application #____________ Date Received >/^w Amount Paid ^ COT OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION i^PLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ^, Site address yjr~ _____ PropertyIdendficadonNumber(PID) - >i- Please check one - Property abstract or Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT ^ r . Name U'Mtrtsn^ torrens? Address -y*« City __ _______Phone (home) Zip £«3f/Phone (work) —OWfER^ different than applicant) . Name ^ Addre^ City (attach list if more than one) •• • * a • E^UNG LAND USE Number of Tax Parcds Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District PROPOSAL ________Phone (home) Zip 39/Phone (work) u- Acres Diy Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______ _ Division for Tax Purposes _ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) Subdivision for New Biulding Sites • Number of Building Sites _________ Existing Units _________New Units Total Units * *Proposed Gross Density Milium Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per ___Acres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) fffOU,d - > SS807. 5 9IpO 0 VS"- ^?'2/35'o. 2—> s-vyor-r I-.. • * > - • - — 41 * f ' -i^ bS! BvV'nR .. _-•••• fox RiDQe HO ...................... S^^t-ilSsa-515 (-A- • : isiSi n «#—- ^Haiii ^7^ * / ^ ' IRCHAIID ^/^' 62 (32) 'H5 (3» X X 1 '& \ I »> *•* **i iV ^ .*f*^ *.S *t •* ■* V • * V .**'■* * • •:■■■/ ■■ ■ • ': ■■•'■■•■ .'•■■■, lv ‘*i I«j* •■.• . .••.:.• ... . ft. * . ■•' ‘*t ’ ^ . r *« ' * ' • *•*•••,•*•* * • V;. V* ’ r. • I • <. > . . I- -.|-•’ •••. .-.■••'• •• '••,' ■Lv .■•I ••;•••..• ••.,•. .•■•gk •• f- ’• I'- ••■’■■ • • ■ &*■«**. ^ ^ ^ m V • ' ■*• * *r • ‘ . V . i.' '! ••• '•* * ;•' ••• • i - •• ''.••.•• •■ " /. * • \ • • • • j*. *j • f • # * *• . >•, « • • • V* * t • • •V vr.v • . V 1 ' •< i ' ' . f » .•• 1 • V .1*; * • ' r ,•. • ^^iTi¥r^' • * ». ; .V' • • • * * % * • * • i . •I . »» .»^ :i • • * •- • • # • ^ »♦ . •• •.* • • t •• • w ‘f H^.7 * • « • / I'j * t V :•••.;■•■.’;•[i V. /!^ -<,r • « . I • ^ * I ’ 2f^/ } ... • • ; • •* •. ' V . . * :• i' A ^ • • #i ' • p. Hi . M C» f t i Jh.. /*/. «• b/ >__/ •A » ♦ • «,»*. •; • • • .* .• I ^ \J •■ .• • •,•■*. \n •'’. • -I, •* • / /,• m $ 4^• 4 V N.: ^ i • % « ^ • '% • RUN DATE d7/21/»» HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY ONNERS LIST REPORT NO. PW35A01 PAGE 1 •ATCH 5tl PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOm 58 iE-llT-ES 21 8002 OOVAO SMITH AVE T E 8 J H 4QTCH THOMAS E 8 JOANNE H OTTCH 88 SMITH AVE MAYZATA MM 55581 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYERrnm/mm 58 82-117-25 21 8818 88115 SMITH AVE CRAIO HERTZENBERO ETAL CRAXO HERTZENBERO 115 SMITH AVE NAYZATA MM 55581 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER ' NAME/AODR 58 82-117-25 21 8825 88888 ORONO ORCHARD RO S DOUGLAS E WHITELEY ET At DOUGLAS E WHITELEY 8 CLAUDIA MYERS-WHITELEY 88 ORONO ORCNARO RO NAYZATA MM 55581 58 82-117-25 21 8852 ■■wR ADDR 88188 ORONO ORCHARD RO S OWNER NAME P S GOSHOARIAN ET AL TJ^AYER PETER S GOSHOARIAN tIAME/AODR AMY GOSHOARIAN 188 ORONO ORCHARD RD S * WAYZATAHN 55581 ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 82-117-25 22 8882 88815 ORONO ORCHARD RD S P L SCHERER 8 0 0 SCHERER PETER L 8 CERI 0 SCHERER 18888 51ST PL N PLYMOUTH HN 55447 I •• { y PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 58 02-117-25 22 8805 80285 ORONO ORCHARD RD S VILLAOE OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 88 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55525 58 02-117-25 21 8005 00080 SMITH AVE VIOLET M OLAHPE TRUSTEE VIOLET M OLAHPE 80 SMITH AVE NAYZATA hH 55581 58 02-117-25 21 8017 80125 SMITH AVE 8 J 8 P J HORNER BRADLEY J 8 PAMELA J HORNER 125 SMITH AVE WAYZATA HN 55581 58 02-117-25 21 0028 00110 SMITH AVE J A FXSX 8 J X FISK JANES A 8 JENNIFER K FISK 110 SMITH AVE NAYZATA MM 55581 58 02-117-25 21 8055 88128 ORONO ORCHARD RD S LOUIS 0 MERCHANT 8 WIFE LOUIS 0 MERCHANT 120 ORO»^' TRCHARD RO S WAYZATA 55581 58 02-117-25 22 8805 08858 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED CARGILL MAC HXLLAN JR ETAL L0N6RI0GE ASSOCIATES » 0 BOX 8588 DEPT 28 HPLS m 55448 58 82-117-25 22 8088 80845 SMITH AVE D W 8 H R HUST DAVID W 8 HEIDI R HUST SHITM AVE WAYZATA HN 55581 58 02-117-25 21 0804 08080 SMITH AVE JANET A MCMILLAN JANET A MCMILLAN 1274 TEALWOOO AVE LONG LAKE HN 55558 • • • 58 82-117-25 21 8822 08118 ORONO ORCHARD RO S J L WYFFELS 8 M J WYFFELS JAMES L 8 MAUDE J WYFFELS 110 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA MH 55581 58 02-117-25 21 0051 00085 SMITH AVE J 8 0 AHLBERO JAMES H 8 DIANNE R AHLBER6 85 SMITH AVE WAYZATA HN 55581 58 02-117-25 22 0081 08858 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED STATE OF HXNN STATE OF MINN IDNRl tLUCE LINE TRAIL) % 58 02-117-25 22 0084 80858 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED STATE OF MINN STATE OF MINN <0NR) fLUCE LINE TRAIL) V ! 58 55-118-25 55 0004 00025 ORONO ORCHARD RD N K J 8 T • SPENCER KEITH J 8 THERESA B SPENCER 25 ORONO ORCNARO RO N LONG LAKE HN 55554 •» r RUN BATE 17/21/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORHATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST BATCH S91 PROP AOOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR. PROP ABOR t I .• ' 58 S5-118*2S S3 9895 99930 AOBRESS UNASSXONEB STATE OP HXNN STATE OP NXMN fONR) . (LUCE LXNE TRAIL) 50 SS-110-23 34 9992 99930 AOBRESS UNASSX6)«0 ONNER NANE STATE OP HINN TAXPAYER STATE OP NXNN ItNR) NANE/AOOR (LUCE LXNE TRAXL) I » * • REPORT NO. PI435401 PACE 2 30 35-110-23 33 9999 99929 ORONO ORCNARO RO N OLO ORCNAROTARN LLC OLO ORCNARO PARN LLC 39 ORONO ORCHARD RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 35-118-23 33 9919 99939 ORONO ORCHARD RD N J L HURPHY 8 S S SMITH JANES NURPNV 8 SANDRA SMITH 39 ORONO ORCHARO RD N HAYZATA NN 55391 TOTAL BATCH ■591 99922 1 CERTIPY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE _ _ REPRESENTATION OF XMFORMATIOM AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OP THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OP PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST OP NY KNOHLEOOE AlO BELIEF DATE . i • . I ■) I To:Ch£ur Hawn and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator From:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner Date:August 9,1999 Re:#2512 Alan and Marilyn Richie 905 Tonkawa Road Class in Preliminary Plat Subdivision-Public Hearing Zoning District:LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 Acre minimum lot size. Sewered Comprehensive Plan: Urban ServiceAJrban Residential Site Area:6.3 Acres Proposal:3 Lot Lakeshore Residential Development (Single Family) Exhibits: A B C D E F G .Application Plat map Property Owner's list Reduced Survey City Engineer report Resolution No. 3317 - Vacating Sewer Easement Sanitary Sewer Map Summary of Request Erotas Building Corporation (applicant) has an interest in property located at 905 Tonkawa Road, owned by Alan and Marilyn RicUe. The applicant has requested a three lot subdivision of a 6.3 acre lot Proposed three lots would be located on North Ann of Lake Minnetonka and have access from Tonkawa Road. As shown on the property survey (Attached Exhibit D) Uie lot is developed as a single residential site with a tennis court, driveway and paved walk to the lake. Applicant has indicated all existing stnic* ures and hardcover will be removed from the property prior to final plat It has been several years since the property has been used for residential purposes. #2512 Alan and Marilyn Richte 905 Tonkenva Road Subdivision 8/m9 pagt ’-l n WT.ttrrr ^TTr^:T|T.l •TilOWi nvit I 11 »] »3 iTn-lfWI r«Vi:l|t '-iilliWO •r^Itli iT^ i I iT’4 iW ri I J:T WiV/-^ *•) tliiLll!^ itOii Tm nriirn (• Mil nil fill 11 Vt mifTiwr I v>S LOT INFORMATION The subdivision is proposed as 3 lots on 6.3 acres. Block 1 Dry Acres Total Acres Loti 1.81 acres 1.81 acres Lot2 2.35 acres 2.35 acres Lot 3 2.14 acres 2.14 acres No designated wetlands are located on the property Each lot exceeds ttiiniTnnm standards for lot width and size, and appears to demonstrate suitable building sites. Surrounding Properties Surrounding properties arc zoned LR-IB (one acre residential). The locality is primarily lakcshore lots that front on either Stubbs Bay, Maxwell Bay or North Arm of Lake Minnetonka. The proposed use and development of the three lots would be consistent with the character of the Tonkawa Area. ZONING . i The parcel is zoned LR-IB, Lakeshore Residential District. The minimum lot area requirement is one (1) acre. The minimum setback requirements are noted below: Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Lakeshore Side Yard 1 acre 140'35'75'10' Access Access to the three lots would he via private driveways to Tonkawa Road. Driveway permits are required from Hennepin County for additional curb-cuts along County right-of-way. The applicant sh^ obtain necessary permits prior to final plat approval. Sewer Property was assessed for 3 units in 1976 as part of the 73-1 sewer project. Sanitary sewer to serve Lots 1 and 2 should be provided sanitary service from Tonkawa Road. The existing sewer on Tonkawa Road cast of Lot 1 should be extended southerly approximately 100-200 feet to serve Lot 2. Sewer connection for Lot 3 is located over the southwestern portion of the property. U25I2 Alan and Marilyn Richie 905 Tonkawa Road Subdivision 8/16/99 E=^ Bluff Impact Zone A bluff spans the entire lakeshore of the property. Structures are required to meet a 30' top of bluff setback. This setback has the greatest impact on proposed Lot 3. able 2. Standard drainage and utility easements along the properly lines will be required for the final plat. * The survey of the property indicates a 20' wide sewer easement across Lot 1 and the northern part of Lot 2. This easement was likely dedicated with the original plat Vasa Park. The easement was vacated in 1993 per Resolution No. 3317 based on the facts the sewer easement did not serve a public purpose and the City did not intend to develop a municipal sewer line within the easement. mtis tsare licant serve /er on ^eLot * •. •. Park Dedication Fee • « 8% of the land value, to be determined by the City Assessor following prelinodnaty s^iproval, will be required for Park Dedication Fee. ** * • • Drainage The City Engineer has stated in his comments dated August 9,1999, the draft version of the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan shows that the site lies within the Stubbs Bay drainage district The site drains to the south and the north from the high point on Lot 2. All ultimately reach North Arm. The bluff area along the lake and the existing topography of the site will make ponding difficult At a minimum we would recommend creating a vegetated buffer strip along the top of the bluff to provide some water quality benefits. Final plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their review. \ Staff has submitted the preliminary plans to the Watershed District however the District has not completed their review as of the date of this report Issues for discussion 1. 2. The property is developed as a single residential site with a tennis court, driveway and paved walk to the lake. The applicant has stated his intention to remove all structures and hardcover prior to final plat approval. All three lots have demonstrated they do meet the zoning district requirements and appear to demonstrate suitable building sites within required setbacks. U25I2 Alan and Marilyn Richie 905 Tonkawa Road Sid>dtvUton 8/16/99 V STAFF RECOMMENDATION All the lots meet the zoning district requirements for developments in the LR-IB zoning district Staff is recommending preliminary approval of the application based on the following conditions: 1. Applicant submits a Grading and Erosion control plan for the entire site to be reviewed and ■ approved by the City Engineer. This must be completed prior to action by the City Council. 2.Applicant ghall obtain a permit from Hennepin County Department of Transportation for new curb-cut and access to Lots 1,2 and 3. 3. Plans be completed for the extension of sanitary sewer service to the property by a registered engineer to the specifications set by the City Engineer and Director of Public Services. Development plans shall be approved by the City prior to final plat approval. mil Alan and Marilyn Richie 905 Tonkawa Road Subdivision 8/16/99 Application # _ Date Received ^ /z/ / Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO r StlEDIVISION ^PLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION _ ^aj ,\ Site addressollw aQuress / ^ ^ Property Identification Number (PID) —<? j*- // 7 - 7.3 " ^ Please check one - Property __—^^abstract or_^ torrens? Attach legal description to application. lars /jZ,3y st^xK/j GCt/A>^jj . ^ * /l/y uMa) ____________ rHv_ /,JJrzjf A y V- ^ Z*” ^agFhone (work) ___-----, )plicant) ffT2iS2»S «»iu-r.v4w WlP ^ ............................................. (attadi fist if more than on^ <* * * * ■fc* . / ^.3 a IAz1£L Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (spe^) _____ • • • ‘ .• . • • • , ‘ • ' EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Diviaon for Tax Purposes ................................... ---------^ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildhng sites) .. '-----Subdivision for New Building Sitw , • : Number ofBuilding Sites ------ •? ~ Total Units ■ Y7. Ft ^yd^le Land Proposed Use (check) . ~ ‘ pthiKspeci^)________ • «• « • \ ru#AW. 1 • • • i § 4—I. • • < :• •*. RUM. DATE 07/15/99 •• . BATCH 515 • • . • ‘ HENNEPXNvCOUNTY property XHFORMATIOM SYSTEM • . PROPERTY OMHERS LIST • • PROP ADOR SB . OB-117-25 S4 OOlS •• __ _ _ _ 0087S PARTEHROOD U. ?SS^ir illiSVelSSSK K .te»ot NANE/ADDR B75 PARTEHWOOO LA • • * lOHO LA((E MN S53SS > • • . SB BB-U7-2S 12 0006 •0990 PARTENHOOD RD *. BRUCE A MARY EN6ELSMA * ‘ BRUCE B MARY ENOELSMA 990 PARTEMHOOP RO LONG LAKE HN . 5S556 # • . •• • • • ( ■PROP ADDR OWIERHAME .•.TAXPAYER' V NAHE/AOM . SB 0B-117-2S 21 0002 ; 00B25 ' TONKARA.ro J E HOORE ALB HOORE' ' JOHN E A LOURDES B MOORE 9551 LAKE HARRIET PKHY E HPLSHN 55909 : • .* • • .SB 08-117-25 a 0005 ••897 ' TONKAHA RD.' ' J p SPOONER A K B.SPOONER J > SPOONER A K B SPOONER iSB5 ORONO U RAYZATA. HM 55391 ..' '*• >. B •% • L RD • , ••SB OB-llY-a'El 0018 . , PROP ADOR 00925 PARTEHROOT “ ORNER NAME.- J A H SAFARJACK A NARY SAPAR 9a PARTENHOOD ROAD . LONG LAKE HN .55556.* f ' • ■- TAXPAYER C,. '. • NANE/ADDR ' ••• • 1 • .* •• • • • • • ’ • SB 08-117-a a oou OOOSB' ADDRESS UNASSXGtO J H SAFAR A N SAFAR JACK SAFAR . 9a PARTENHOOD M LONG lake HN 55556 •• • ; -SB 08-117-a a oois .• • • :• . I A .*'.Prop ADOR -oo9M tonkara a . .. ; ORNER NAME RILLIAH J MCLELLAM ETAL • TAXPAYER ,. RlLLXAH J NCLELLAM ■ NANE/ADDR «5 TONKAHA W*® •. LONG LAKE HN 55556 • • •SB 08-117-a El 0019 00955 TONKAHA M JAN GILBERT JANES H A MARY M 6XUERT 955 TONKAHA RD •. LONG LAKE HN 55^6 . • • • *•«\ V. PROP ADDR ORNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR total DAfCH 515 00012 • • I. • • . i • . .• • •• • i « I •/ • • •• • , ' * • . • •• * II I• I REPORT NO. PI935901 PACE 10 SB' 0B-117-2S a 0001- 00801 . TONKAHA. a E A DANnaR A J.L DANZIGER ERXC A A JENNIFER L DAWSGER BOl TONKAHA RD LONG LAKE HN ,.aa6 • • • • ♦ •• SB 08-117-a 2i 0007 00950 PARTENHOa a ‘HALAa C A JO ELLB L HURR HALAa A JO ELLEN HURR 930 PARTENHaD aa LONG LAKE HN 55356 . -i V • • • * V •6 • • : • • • r:./.:.-. ; •• I .* ••* * . • * • • • • • • •• • Ji • i • G • a oB-117-a a 0012 . 00905 TONKAHA WO A P RICHIE AHA RICHIE A P RXCaE AHA RXCNiE 950 moHcaPT a HAYZATA MN 55591 . • • •• •* : J ... . . • * •» ■ * • • a 0B-U7-23 a 0017 ••960 PARTENHOa a GARY H A JEANNE H KRIHNEL GARY.H a JEANNE M KRXHHEL 960 PARTENHOa a Lao LAKE m 55a6 • J, \ V . 0 * • • I . • * . •• • I •• .1 • • • 4 . p • •_ ' iSr.j. V i 1 ■■ . -A’*. .' ‘ • A .4 f. I *• • #: • V • •t .• • • • Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik end Associates, tnc. Is an Affirmative Actlor^/Bqual Opportunity Employer Principals: Otto G, Bonestroo. PE. • Joseph C Anderlik. P£, • Marvin L Sorvala. PX • Glenn R. Cooir, PX • Robert G. Schunicht. PX • Jerry A. Bourdon, PX • Robert W. Rosene. PX. Richard E. TUrner, PX and Susan M. Bbeilla CPA., Senior Consultanu Associate Principals: Hoviard A. Sanford, PX • Keith A. Gordoa PX • Robert R. Pfefferfe. PX • Richard W. Foster. PX • David O. Loskota. PX • Robert C Russek. AXA. • Mark A. Hanson. PX • Michael T. Rautmann. PX • Ted ICFIeld, PX • Kenneth P Andersoa PX • Mark R. Rolfs. PX • Sidney R Wllliamscn, PX IS. • Robert P. Kotsmlth • Agnes M. Ring • Allan Ride Schmidt. PX Engineers & Architects August 9,1999 Offices: Sl Paul, Rochester, Wlllmar and St Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl WeOsite: www^onestroo.com . Mr. Paul Weinberger Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re:Richie 3-Lot Subdivision BRAFUeNo. 139-2512 Dear Paul: We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed three-lot subdivision for Alan and Marilyn Richie. The site is located on the west side of Hennepin County Road No. 135 (Tonkawa Road) just-north of the Partenwood Road intersection in the northwest quarter of Section 8. We have the foUowing comments m regards to engmeering matters. 1. Access: Proposed access locations for Lots 1 and 2 should be shown on the plans and submitted to Hennepin County for their review. 2. Grading: A grading and erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review. Removing the existing bituminous/concrete walkway to the lake on Lot 3 will create an.erosion concern. This area should be restored immediately after the hardcover removal with fiber blanket and bale checks or equivjdenL Erosion control nieasures should be in place prior to any grading or structure removal. 3. Drainage: The draft version of the City’s Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shows that the site lies within the Stubbs Bay drainaae distri-L The site drains to the south and the north from the high point on Lot 2. All flows ultimately reach North Arm. The bluff area along the lake and the . existing topography of the site wiU make ponding difficult At a minimum we would recommend creating a vegetated buffer strip along the top of the bluff to provide some water quality benefits. Final plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their review. 4. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer to serve Lot 3 exists west of the existing home along the south property line Lots 1 and 2 should be provided sanitary service from Tonkawa Road. The existing sanitary on Tonkawa Road east of Lot 1 should be extended southerly approximately 100 feet to serve Lot 2. It is unclear why there is an existing sanitary sewer easement shown across aU of Lot 1 and part of Lot 2. Drainage and utility easements should be proyid^ 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet unde along the roadway right-of-way. . • . • 5 Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we can prepare an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required if the City so desires. Please contact me at (651) 604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly» „ BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC Tom Kellogg CC: Oreg Gappa, City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul. MN 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 • Fax; 651-636-1311 • . CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION VACATING A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT WITHIN THE PLAT OF VASA PARK, SECTION 08, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 . IN THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA FILE NO. 1849 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal coiporation organized and existmg under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on July 21, 1993 the Estates of Barbara B. Lund and Russell T. Lund, Jr. filed a petition with the Ci^ of Orono requesting die vacation of a sanitary sewer easement originally dedicated in the plat of Vasa Park, legally described as follows: - . The samtary sewer easement shbwn oh Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, VASA PARK, . according to the recorded plat thereof. • • • • • • WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held before the City Planning Commission on August 16, 1993, regarding said vacation and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission recommended approval of die proposed vacation and the Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in consideration of the following findings: 1. 2. The Ci^ has not and does not intend to develop a municipal sewer line within the 20* easement. The location of the easement within the proposed building envelope of the undeveloped lot will present problems with the future residential development of the site and force development closer to lake. 3. The sanitary sewer easement as it exists serves no public purpose. Page 1 of 2 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. S S 1 ?_____ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of the Estates of Barbara B. Lund and Russell T. Lundj Jr. is hereby granted and that the sewer easement legally described above is hereby yacated. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on August 23, 1993. Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of August, 1993 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. My commUslon •xplrtt Notary Public I * Page 2 of 2 o C cCT' o-w • . (^ .• ■'iCERTIFlCATE OF SURVEY AND *} PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR . . ALAN AND MARILYN 'RI CHIE OF LOTS 1, 2. & 3. BLOCK 1. VASA PARK;^^^ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ‘ ‘ ‘<V M *<a , _____ SSSSt*^ V\x iv.lt .1 <\ I \5! /. /<n 'sV'' \ oL'l // % \ V '. ‘. 1 \ \ \ \ \ N\ y / / K‘ t • oasmi HOUSE L-arC I U ' C ?r <3Vi. )'■' // \ \ / V \ rYjivW'■\ •■»///.>«matte«tVttgrtwi \>yi HV • I o I #Mt« Ai*W li 40^ tiUnHf €wO«r INm ifty rt WMtf Hit imy to •«•I 01 Unnit ^rU% md !■• I «Mt Ml pwyvt to aitov wf «toir h<9^ COFFIH & GbONBKRG, WC nflITTI********* ^ 411 t/liMU0(i:4H& IOC IM IK I839i , •tV47>-4HI 1 «ov «0tvrr ««r M ^wnuriK 01 to«a MO*to> vr « ««M8i wr mb ■fONton Vtoto !•-» 1 OTif 1 Mi • PIMv Mtotol MB M ua to K M V IMCtoto • TaTTi 7-«-w| joi Ma 1 tf-ias 1 n-22< Wm COMMUNICATIONS.MEDIA DIVISION DOCUMENT COMMUNICATIONS TO;Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE; Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator August 10,1999 SUBJECT; #2506 Edward H. Hamm 485 Orono Orchard Road South Guest House Conditional Use Permit-Public Hearing Zoning District; Lot Area: RR-IB 18 acres One Family Rural Residential District Application: On April 12,1999 the City Council approved sanitary sewer extension to the principal residence and two existing guest houses on the Hamm property. A condition of approval was to formally permit the two existing guest houses legal by requiring the property owner to submit an application to the City of Orono for a Guest House Conditional Use Permit. The conditional use permit would allow continued use of the property as a principal dwelling and two secondary guest houses. The number of dwellings is limited to three on the property for the three sewer units that have been provided on the site. The property owner will enter into a Declaration of Subdivision Covenant with the City to limit the dwelling units on the property to three this declaration shall be filed on the chain of title for the property. Site Analysis Guest houses must meet minimum principal building setbacks and be located behind the principal residence. The RR-IB zoning district requires the following: RR-IB (1 acre) Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Required 2 acres 6 acres for 2 guest houses 200’50'30’50’ The guest houses meet all required yard setbacks, and the property is in excess of the required acreage to maintain the required density (1 dwelling unit per 2 acres) in the zoning distric Issues for Discussion 1. 2. 3. The property has a restrictive covenant placed on the chain of title stating no more than three dwelling units shall be allowed on the 18 acre site and in the event the property is subdivided it may not exceed three developable lots. The proposal meets all requirements for a guest house for lot area and structure setbacks. The property will be connected to sanitary sewer. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval for a guest house Conditional Use Permit for property located at 940 South Brown Road based on the structure meets the yard requirements established by the Municipal Code for a guest house CUP subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. The property has a restrictive covenant placed on the chain of title stating no more than three dwelling units shall be allowed on the 18 acre site and in the event the property is subdivided it may not exceed three developable lots. The conditional use permit be granted in accordance with the conditions listed in Resolution No. 4271. Attachments A B C D E F Application for Conditional Use Permit Location Map Site Survey Plat Map Resolution No. 4271 Property Owners List A Application # OU Date Received" 7 ^ f/ Amount Paid n^j^oO CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION , n J ^ Site Address VTiC' ^oK-n^ Type of Application to be Filed _______ Property Identification Number (P.ID.) 3 o / APPLICANT ^ Name ic:^A m Phone (horne d 3 ____________ _________ Phone (work Sc^><-7-i ^otzjO City ______Zip. OWNER Crf different than applicant) Name Phone (home). Phone (work). Address City Zip. Date Property Acquired I (do not) also own the adjacent parcefs of land. (monthtyear) •. f •••,..FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - S 75.00 For each variiuice request wth' CUP application $175.00 Residential Accessory Use $250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments __^ $200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg ____$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $250.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore f PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no chaage from original application) Afler-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee ’ OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation $200.00 Easement Vacation $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. ^ Completed Application Form. 2. ____Describe request in detail. 3. - Certified Property Owners List of owners wthin 350', labels and plat map O^ou must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). 4. Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. 5. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. 6. ____Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). 7. ____List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). 8. ____Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). 9. ____As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11" X 17" OR SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information hu not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Imtials of Clerical Staff. ^_____________Date ____________________ APPUCANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by ori^al fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her Imowledge. Applicant's agnature _____Date__________________ OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staf^ consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation rmd verification of this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the Ci^ ofQces 25 ds^s before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council If an applicant is unable to attend a >*cheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. S'lS-- / 'cm • • ^ox niD6i no WAY \ **Y..'OronOi> pGoIfi-iJ ■•^purjeVi'’ feSii G < {*-••,‘''.j WOOD HUl AVE ^Vi 0^ .*< U ■: V/X'■••'r'«-—f ?: v,i H : vX i ^o» =^/ ) ua » !,* PEAVl o \ /-OCO.V'O'^ . ! Ld I M I c. OF SEC. 2-117-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY UINNF<>nTA • i • • • ••• ■•A* • f * m ^ ■ J •••. ••• #25 OS 'll•- .Vnr•1<- - ? Li ^ 0.?-11 33-(IM) ORWJO GOLF COURSE i ■. . ••■y' i • i </ •* .- '■ v( '■] ^^■ ..iwj------5s5v_i^----A--------------------------- ^5«2a cn I 0^-1 H'. nrTFTwr -WOOOfHK-A«»€---------*5 lirw^ni------------- V <3'in' 03'»n-S3 •te» '" R L S RO 1 (IP6^ rvi^/I s«!® Ml t '' * ^ « («l ^ h\ '« r 1A ^ 1 Kl^ t|^ iV; ■ «v' \» I • < ’ j;uL• i»7-a3-(0?«i) r ^ ENSaN- M t ■ ■ • a I 2PiS21 VMM :r<.x aP!il»wcn:sar'wc aw- «icE3i.TC:i : jf.^ DfHlm JLOL mmMm aiu; 031- \ 9 9> •I'J •3V(S)“"i DRACOHFLir ,«- «1U \» • f. •. Co^£ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MO 4 ^NO. • A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR SEWER CONNECTION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 465-485 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH WHEREAS, Edward Hamm (hereinafter "applicant") is the owner of property in the City of Orono located at 465-485 Orono Orchard Road (hereinafter "the property") legally described as follows: Exhibit A attached; and WHEREAS, the property is approximately 18 acres in area and contains a principal residence structure containing 8 bedrooms and two individual guest house or caretaker house structures each containing 1 bedroom, which would nonnally require 3 individual septic systems and 3 alternate dramfield sites; and ^ • WHEREAS, the existing septic systems serving the 3 dwelling units are interconnected and have exhibited intermittent failure for many years, and are also nonconforming due to lack of 3' separation from the zone of seasonal saturation; and WHEREAS, a site evaluation has been completed by a licensed Site Evaluator and it has been deteimined that the property contains only two suitable drainfield sites instead of the six that would normally be required, and use of such sites would have the following negative impacts: 1. Use of the tested sites would require continued interconnection of septic systems serving three individual dwellings, and the associated complexities and problems • inherent in such interconnections. # • 2. Use of the suitable primary septic site would require the removal of at least three mature pine trees and jeapordize other trees in the area; use of the alternate site would similarly result in the removal of younger trees which provide screening and would similarly jeapordize mature trees in the immediate area. Page 1 of 4 DITYof RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.1- 1 3.Both tested sites would place a drmnfield less than the City minimum requirement of 75' from the existing well. 4.The heavy clay soils on the site tend to create a somewhat higher risk of system failure than other soil types, posing a potential threat to public health, safety and welfare. 5. If the system failed, it would impact 3 separate dwellings, not just one; and WHEREAS, the property is adjacent to the existing MUSA and is nw existing municipal sewer lines which can feasibly be extended to serve the property; and WHEREAS, the property substantially meets die criteria established by the City for use of the 50 'floating' sewer units approved by the Metropolitan Council for properties outside the MUSA boundary; and WHEREAS, the applicant has indicated he will pay all costs associated with extension of the existing municipal sewer, connection charges, etc. and will agree to permanently limiting development of the 18-acre site to just 3 dwelling units, via deed covenants or other suitable instruments; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that permanently limiting development of this 18-acre parcel to 3 dwelling units would be in keeping with the City's rural low-density philosophy as detailed in the Orono Community Management Plan, and would provide an ultimate level of development that is suitable for the site given the various site development constraints including wetlands, steep slopes, etc.; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that, in combination, the factors and findings noted above establish that this is a unique situation as compared to others, and that there is a substantial basis to allow approval of the sewer connection subject to appropriate conditions. Page 2 of4 « i t; ClTYofORON RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4 •C;- ‘V NO. _ '• ‘ Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota on this 12th day of April, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriet^abbour, Mayor (1) Property Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instninient was acknowledged before me this 12th day of April, 1999 by Linda S. Vee and Gabriel Jabbour, City Clerk and Mayor respectively, of the City of orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the mumcipal corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On diis day of , 1999 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 mm DATE M/2D/99 BATCH 508 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY ZNFORHATION SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 02-117-23 23 0008 00387 ORONO ORCHARD RD S D D I K N HACHILLAN DAVID D HACHILLAN PO BOX 8300 DEPT 28 HPLS HN 55440 PROP ADDR OWNER HAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 02-117-23 24 0008 00380 ORtiNO ORCHARD RD S SEN OSBORN STEELE.B OSBORN 380 ORONO ORCHARD RD WAYZATA HN 55381 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 02-117-23 31 0007 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ROGER J HAWKZHSON ROGER J HAWKIHSON 570 ORONO ORCHARD RD WAYZATA HN 55381 0010 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 02-117-23 31 01380 FOX ST JONATHAN D 8 GRETA H WITCHER .JONATHAN E GRETA WITCHER 1380 FOX ST WAYZATA HN 55381 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAItt/AODR 38 02-117-23 31 0048 . 00500 ORONO ORCHARD RD S S S E J E WEBSTER STEVEN S 8 JO ELLEN WEBSTER BOO ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA HN 55381 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 02-117-23 32 0003 01540 FOX ST J A NOLAN E J A NOLAN JOHN A NOLAN E JOAN A NOLAN 1540 FOX ST WAYZATA HN 55381 REPORT NO. PAGE ri435401 19 38 02-117-23 23 0007 01580 FOX ST W HACHILLAN ET AL TRUSTEES WHITNEY HACHILLAN DEPT 28 P 0 BOX 8300 HPLS HN 55440 38 02-117-23 23 0008 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED L0N6RIDGE ASSOC LONGRIDGE ASSOC C/0 ROBERT J THEILER P 0 BOX 8S00DEPT 28 HPLS HN 55440 38 02-117-23 31 0005 00540 ORONO ORCHARD RD S SANDRA S LARSON SANDRA S LARSON 1540 8TH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55358 38 02-117-23 31 0008 00550 ORONO ORCHARD RD S LAWRENCE E NELSON LAWRENCE E NELSON 550 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA HN 55381 38 02-117-23 31 0008 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ROGER J HAWKINSON ROGER J HAWKINSON 570 ORONO ORCHARD RD WAYZATA HN 55381 38 02-117-23 31 9008 01380 FOX ST HERBERT D HEYER HERBERT D HEYER BOX 12 WAYZATA m 55381 ■ft :■' 38 *02-117-23 31 0011 00570 ORONO ORCHARD RD S ROGER J HAWKII ROGER J HAWK] 570 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA HN 55381 38 02-117-23 31 0047 00450 ORONO ORCHARD RD S KEVIN GARNETT KEVIN GARNETT 450 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA HN 55381 38 02-117-23 32 0001 00485 ORONO ORCHARD RD S EDWARD H HAHH TRUSTEE EDWARD H HAHH 408 ST PETER ST 8434 ST PAUL HN 55102 38 02-117-23 32 0002 01520 FOX ST ALLE6RA W PARKER P L 8 A W PARKER 1520 FOX ST WAYZATA HN 55381 •• V 38 02-117-23 32 0006 •1580 FOX ST W HACHILLAN ET AL TRUSTEES WHITNEY HACHILLAN DEPT 28 P 0 BOX 8300 HPLS HN 55440 38 02-117-23 32 0007 01570 FOX ST S H REYNOLDS 8 D D REYNOLDS S H REYNOLDS 8 D D REYNOLDS 1 E DEUWARE CHICAGO ZL 80611 • • I 1 RUN DATE OA/20/99 • . BATCH 508 HEIMEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATIOH SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. Pl^i3S<i01 PAGE 20 j • it PROP Al OMNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR s. 58 D2*117-2S 32 0008 00038 ADDRESS UNASSI6NED H HACNILLAN ET AL< TRUSTEES HNXTNEY NACNILLAN DEPT 28 P 0 BOX 9300 HPLS NN 55940 38 02-117-23 33 0001 01485 FOX ST L J COE A H E KNUTSON LEANN J COE/NARK E KNUTSON 1485 FOX ST NAYZATA m 55391 38 02-117-23 33 0002 01465 FOX ST K A I C A BIRKELAND ET AL KAARE* 0 CYNTHIA BIRKELAND 1465 FOX ST NAYZATA HN 55391 i i 1 1. PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 02-117-23 33 0010 01410 SHORELINE OR A HARRISON 8 I L HARRISON ALFRED 8 INGRID L HARRISON 1410 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA HN 55391 38 02-117-23 33 0011 01401 SHORELINE DR EDWARD H HAHN TRUSTEE EDWARD H HAHN 408 ST PETER ST 8434 ST PAUL HN 55102 38 02-117-23 33 0013 00038 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED DAKOTA RAIL INC ALFRED HARRISON 1410 SHORELINE OR NAYZATA HN 55391 > I • ■( • • t '■r PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 02-117-23 34 0006 01395 ORONO LA NORWEST BK HPLS-NTL ASC TRST N THONAS - HS0046 C/0 NORWEST TRUST REAL EST 6TH 8 HARQUETTE HPLS HN 55479 38 02-117-23 01397 ORONO DANA H HELLS DANA N HELLS 1397 ORONO LA NAYZATA NN 34 0007 LA 55391 38 02-117-23 34 01399 ORONO LA KEVIN R KOKESH KEVIN R KOKESH* 1399 ORONO LA NAYZATA HN 55391 0008 \ * PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 02-117-23 34 0012 01355 SHORELINE OR D 8 H JOHNSON DOUGLAS D JOHNSON 4194 CENTER BOARD LA S E STUART FL 34997-6176 001638 02-117-23 34 01385 FOX ST ANDREW J 8 J DIANN OOETTEN ANDREW J 8 J DIANN GOETTEN 1385 FOX ST NAYZATA HN 55391 38 02-117-23 34 0019 00it38 ADDRESS PENOXNO ANDREW J 8 DIANN GOETTEN ANDREW J 8 J DIANN GOETTEN 1385 FOX ST NAYZATA HN 55391 I PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 02-117-23 41 0009 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED HCLEOD CNTY REG RAIL. AUTH DAKOTA RAIL INC 25 ADANS ST N HUTCHINSON NN 55350 000438 03-117-23 41 01620 FOX ST THE WAKEFIELD ORONO PTHRSHP THE WAKEFIELD ORONO PTHRSHP C/0 ROBERT J THEILER P 0 BOX 9300 DEPT 28 HPLS HN 55440 TOTAL BATCH 508 00032 & -O' • » IJ •7 . •/ •V y. ; '7 *r..T TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator Kris Jenson, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner August 9,1999 #?508 James Erler, 3448 North Shore Drive Variance-Public Hearing Zoning: LR-1C, One Family Lakeshore Residential District Application: To add a second story to an existing 1 1/2 story home, 2.4 feet &om the side yard property line, where 10 feet is required, a variance of 7.6 feet. STAFF SUMMARY In order to add a second story to the existing residence, a sideyard setback is required. The home currently sits behind both the 75* lakeshore setback as well as the Average Lakeshore Setback. The addition will not result in any changes of the building envelope, however, hardcover calculations have been submitted as required. A hardcover variance is not required for this application. This lot is part of 2 - 75-250' lakeshore setback zones. A small triangle-shaped part of the lot is within the 250'-500' setback zone. The only hardcover within 75' of the lake is County Road 51, North Shore Drive. The height of the proposed structure is 28'. Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.25 LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District, Subd. 6, Area, Height, Lot Width, and Yard Requirements (B) Lots. The minimum side yard shall be 10'. ANALYSIS LR-IC District Standards Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard 1/2 Acre 100'30'30'10' Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard .29 acres, 12,632 sq. ft. 50'160'+to lake, 85 ’ to Cty. Rd. 51 IT 10’, 2.4’ §2508 Janus ErUr, 5448 North Short Drtvt Varkmct August 9,1999 pagt-l Hardcover • » li. Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0-75'1,310 s.f.Os.f. (0%) none (0%) 0 s.f. (0%; 75-250'**9,230 s.f.3,068 s.f. (33.2%) 2,307.5 s.f. (25%) 3,068 s.f. (33.2%) 250-500'39 s.f.36 s.f. (92.3%) 11.7 s.f. (30%) 36 s.f. (92.3%) I ’*'*Note that these figures reflect the hardcover in both 75'-250' zones, and a portion of the lot is in both zones. Please refer to the survey STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variance to allow a second story addition to the existing residence at 3448 North Shore Drive with a sideyard variance of 7.6'. Exhibits: A B C D E F G Application Location Map Plat Map Survey Elevations Hardcover Calculations Neighboring Property Owners List . §2308 Jamu ErUr, 3448 North Short Drhm VarUmct j4ugust§, 1999 pagt^Z I • I. I. A Application# Date Receivi^ Amount Paid ^ cmr OF ORONO - variance application Initial Application Fee S250.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION , , ^ ^ She Address AlAnJl4 S&. Property Identification Number 00214- Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date ProDfii*¥-Acquired, I (doW^ noO^so own the^adjacent parcels of larid. i^se oforo .(month/year) PreseraTl5e"6fproperty: '^Residential Zoning District: ll-R i R other (specify). APPLICANT Name Address ^ f— Phonefhome ) ^ - Phone(worki _________ , Zip:0.5'rf^/ OWNER (if different than applicant)nan appucani;_. Name / Phone (home). Phone (work). Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST . Estimated Construction Cost $__^_____, Describe request in detail: Nid. UTifYi (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width ^ Setback: Front .^Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHEP/DESCRIPTTON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: _____________________:___________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadlme_date._in order for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 3. X ^ y/5. 6. / Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map firom Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center^^^^^^^^:. v/ Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 814 x 11 for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in ensting grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views provide one (1) copy 814" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requcotcd by City staff. X I# X The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that ywx variance application is not complete if th e above information has not been APPLICANT ’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date m OWNER’S SIGNA'____ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and veiifiwtion of this request. Date Applicant must haC'e all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Buildmg & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. rrli-'-CSiir 1 leoo ft JilPHLO 5 •AMirMIIMI V 'MX SEE MAP 61 r—* kW^^rison MINNETRiSTA 2400 i \%¥W.I r:IS3 mm VtfMMl no10/ #* r :/p K ungdori:f^-:i-^<^ V mfftdm 3200 fA"y)m\4 Kin%\ Point 4000 Horitaobit •. W '. W-tWTUn ■■: ViViJir »4U0i«uu MOUND ■li.tSiiMl.uX- ” -j- Z-ate V I SEE MAP 89 Minnetonka ■ *•’»'••••>' •••W- . V^t4-i>vv ■/.. ‘.A*r -i- •'./» .< iS^ •.«••••.- / . i^l> Fogirnm Pdnt .#' , - t Bay •* • A •\spii I 0. » *y . Car/non?^Jp«-™ i>i liiiiuoi '. ft* >'.-i'V.MmL^: OROND Eshad V^'*' ISLAND Mfv^'4 |ENaiAKIro■»;f;4^’ ISLAND^' ,/.^ fSHOBEWOODv^ 3-1» 3l5 li /l7-d3 r •K t • : • ••• .* ./V ^ ’ . .V* ••• ' •• • • ••.. •; .. • .» . 4* V !• • • •. *• t 4 : • .* : • • • ••4. • *. • • • .•A •. ••/ . • • . . »• • n- • •* •• * • ••• ■••.r *1^ f- , *. *• • • • . [<56RTIFICAtE OF SURVEY FOR I \ ■f I'v-jS"O V^;>JV /-^ K? V JIM ERLER IN LOT 18/LybiAfe'S PARK I • , iHENNEP’lN COUNTY. MINNESOTA .. \ © utAL oncatPTioii or Ftimsist All mat part «f tht Soutiiwfttarly half of Lot lA. «. *lf4tartf*s Park* Laka NIoottoiika. lying Soutnaattarly of •* * * a llaa parallal vttA and dtitaot If/.SO fatt Mortiiwaftarif frta tit %aaa llaa at tliowa oa* tia orlglaal plat of *Ljrdlard Park* Laka fHaaatenka. togatnar «ltn an aaiaaant for roadway purpotaa avar a ractangular placa of land 10 5/ I4.S foot, datcrtoid as followi: CoMaoclag at a point itf.fO faat Rortliwattarly froo tka kata llaa of tald Lot IS, and 20 faat lartkaattarly froo tna Soutkwaftarty ilda llaa of lald Lot, and oataading la a Portliwaitarly dlractlon, a dlstanca o' 24.S, parallal wltk tald Sootkwattarly tida llaa: tkaaca Sowtkwaitarly 20 faat to said Sootkwastarly tida llaa, aad parallal to tka tald kata llaa of Lot II; tkaaca aloag tka Sowtkwastarly tida llna of tald Lot I la a Soutkaattarly dlractloa a dittanca of 24.8 foots tkooco la a Mortkaattarly dlractloa aloag a llna parallal to tald kata llaa, a dittanca of 20 faat to tka point of kaglaaiag. o: daaotat Iron aarkar tat •! danotii Iron oarkar found laarlngt tkown ara kaiad wpoa aa attooad datua. Tklt turvay latandt to tkow tha koundarlat of tka abova datcrlkad proparty, tka location of an ailttlag kouta, garaga, and tkad, aad tka location of all oaltting *kardcofar* tkaraon. It doat iot purport to tkow any oikar loprovaoantt or ancroackoantt* « t • ^ onA«Mfv aa%wc»k IKfl • MM * . i I - 4*.W■rnmiaiynROMBERGi^lNC." ,i cHyulh'^ is: rif I.irl; • L**nv;*T.»Lt ' JV' I iMikr ««<idy iiw du» pkTMnl tv *r «v «nA« V Pm fWiMi. and dkit IM a JHkr i«|GkM«J Cnd Engpnm wid LMd Oia kwra td Ow 5uia aHilnm^na. ttait 1 Ciunkfa k&nawaa NnwiHtir^ ;• 0 • •• • X4U r.2s>- o*n iu« •« f$J7f 4 ............ ^ . .. g . f P***^ JcM, r/t.t.«K^ dW^^t034-2L- Vv f • • • V • "I • • • in Sior ^ i '5 il .•vi • • •I vJlA\ HARDCOVE * SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE)75-250’25-500'500-1000' EXISTING HARDCQVF-W IN ZONE AiT'HoW® V***** • • . .,3^ . ——■ — • I '« »*.•♦» ft * * «• •. •H- s:f. Lentih Widib 9 m • «••••• «»*. h •• • •• •••••• • •• ^9 4 X X X ^ S.E,... S.F. B. Garage . C7-priveway-.• S' X •• ••r • f • •8 . D. Sidiwftlk ■i‘i \ ■jJi !• I I .1 # • X- • •• • E. Patio/Deck X X • • • •*. ..• • • F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic. Or Fabric • X X X G.,.. .O.thcr • m/ • X •11 • •! # # *m ••• •A • • ^ •• ••• ••fi •• • .••••• •••-A.** . .1. . • . ; . '•S.F. i • S.F. •• • • • • • . ..«« * : • o . • • • S-F.. • • • ^ •S.F. C3 • • • • r 1. * ^ • . • • f 1-• S. R*:.. • •. .«•» ....S.F.- • • • • • # •• % . . ■ ^ ■* • • • .• • •. S.F. . . ‘ * B *1 vS.F. es •• • • •• • S.F. ■ 8 «S.F. B * •S.F. • • • • • H . . • • >••*> m » • • • ••• • •••• • 4 g.*..* . •* . • • 1* ( • • • • •. •• .• f S.F; • -........................* • •• . •• • • •• • -.# i - ! . * • •• •• ••' • • 9 ^ • # •«««• m • % O' m • mm % • 0 ^ S..F.. A . ••• . . •• m /Jtco i s.f;....B /3/0 .. X 100 . - .C -- ^ PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______ • . X *• • *.■ . -. r L^th,' Width • t X X >k f 9 •••• •• —• B. Garage C. DrivwVay X X lee: S.F. • • • • D. Sidewalk X X 0\ E. Patio/Deck X X • ft • • •• ••• • •• mt • ^ • • F. Landscape • Underlain .............. • • By PiMtic. / - - * * •—......Or Fabric" .................. * X X X. • S.F. • • - • 'S.F,., S.F,. G. Other • •.........TOTAL- HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY ARFA IN ZONE A • — ® ► ,• S.P. ^ • V S.F. • t • .. t • • X100 - S.F. % A • B . • # ••• • •• • rt f •♦ a r • •• • • • *• • •««« • m A • • * • « . • # • •• 14 • • • ••• • • hardcover CALCULA'** ' • • ; ** SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 ’75-250’ tyoi<j\b«±:Ej 2S-5C0’500-1000' f t • EXISTING HAr- rnVER IN ZONE A. • House • ______‘ Leofth Width ---------------------- WftL Pit _____ [ B.: Garage .. ■ • ' . jA , ----.'...C. ^r>v eii»a y ^ I* I _i.„. ... • • < \ Sidewalk AHO 6LAg or ✓ f * • • «i« % E. Patio/Deck* ‘ X X X -X X X X X »• X ■ X • • •«» • • • • r * J k *F. Landscape *• • • ‘‘X ? i . • 1 • V •Underlain '. .. •*t ■ • !•By Plastic.X •s Or Fabric • m *1 • •••* • •» •«* G. Ocher TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE lOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ^c^. jt£. #x/^i. -► B___________^ IPO “ PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE ^ ~ ~ •* • -• ' • • • A. House Lcnjth • • 90 # • • I • 9 0 • • • • •• •• •• B. Garage • • • • C. Drive^ixay D. Sidewalk E. Patio/D.eck F. Landscape Ooderlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other X X >x •Width • • • • I .M X X X X X 4 X • X X X • •- X_____ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE •• total ’PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •• • « • «• • • A •• 4M •- «••• •.•••.*.• • ^ ----------- : X. 100 s .• . . • ••••* 14 • • m % » m • •• #• • '.’S€3 .. • !• % ' S.F. ‘ " S.F. nc? ....S,F. -27 S.F. 3QZ S.F. 9 •«\of :• • S.F... S.F. liia?S.F. • • • •S.F. •s.f; ' S.F. # * * •S.F. • - •• • * • • •-S.'F.. S.F. > • • * •• • «i •• • • •• • 9 • * t * *• * •» .• • •. • • ‘ t S.F. • • • 30€8 • • « S.F. JzTd S.F. PS. 2^ • • • • % • • •••• • •• • 0 ••S.F. 1 •* • • •S.F. « - ♦ ««-. S.f: S.F.! 1 • • • , • • -f 1 ■■ s.t: # ^ • • S.F.’ . • • • • 'S.F. • • • --••••• •••». :ST. S.F. • « • * •.•S.F, , 0 • • •. a.F.. • • . * • s:f. ■ ■ , 1 ^ • • •' 's:‘F. • ..••• • • • S.P. • -« • «• • • 0 • • . S.F. • .. T S.F. ---------------------- % 9 • • • • • • A B • • iijf) Q- GQ I • ^ • A B '.I' • * HARPCOVER CALCULATlOiN VVOKK^tUsisT^. SETBACK ZOr^: (CmCLE ONE) 0*75’ * 75-250’ ^j2S^S0gi>^500-1000' • .i * 'A. House • X C9 * B 1•t Ixngch ••X Widih '• • 1 X 8 :L*X S II • * •.• ••• . . - • B. Garaee x‘ •: • • • • • . w .1- e- • • * C. Driveway^l-AB X • •• • • - • • X •• •• • • •••• •« ••• ^ * • D. Sidewalk • X • • • • • • . ; 1 • f-•X • li. t:E. Patib/Deck X • • • •• ».• . t* 1 • X • •• -•0 .1 p1 • • F. Landscaoe X • . * .f • Underlaift . .X cs • ^ ■ i*Bv Plastic.X .V.1 Or Fabric •’ • ••.!• • • * . . G. Other • • • X . • • • H • 11% •• • TOTAL HARDCOVER Ihl ZONE . .. .TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A + B • . • • m • • .X 100. < • • • •• • .• ( f •• •• PRbPOSED ittAlRDCOVER IN’ZO'NE - • — — • • • 1••A. House X *=* • •• u m . •— - L*n|ih . * • p mm • •« * • •• • • • • X widih • • • • • • • f• ifJ • • •• •X •cs • •% • • •* 1 • •-X { 1•. . B. -Garaae. ... ...X • • • • f• C. Drive^y X • • • • . • • • • • • X m *• • • •••• * . . D. Sidewalk #. • • m mm m 9 ..X • •« > • • • # . • • • ••• # • • • •X • •• • m •i • • #•E. Patio/Deck X • • •X •• •• • * • F. Landscaoe X • * • • • •Underlain X •WS, • •Bv Plastic X• f• • • • Or Fabric *• ••••• ...... -m ^ ^• • # % • • • • . n Other • mm • m mmm • • •• • • • X • • • * • • • ' , •• t • • M *•*? * • • •t • total HARDCOVER IN ZONE ----: " •:• • TOTAL property area in zone . A 4- B • •••. . * • m • • •• ... ' • X 100. • • • • • • m m mm m 1 « • • •• • • • - - * ^ r.r. • • • ... .. • ■ • .. . ' m» • • • •• • • • • • • • •• • 14 • • • • • • . • • • • • 9$ . .i ’ * • * j s:Fr S.F. s.F. S.F. •S.F. 13 S.F. S;F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. s.f; S.5 ’s.f. • • • •• • • • •• S.F.‘ • 3/ 39 ^2.31 S.F; S.F. % A B • “ • ••*..# «*•* •• S.F. • • RtJN DATE •7/ta/99 BATCH 592 38 08>117-25 92 0005 PROP ADOR • *03930 NORTH SHORE DR S J A A C TRAHICK STEVEN I ALICIA TRAHICK NANE/ADDR ' 29 OEEPHOOO RD BEDFORD NY 10506 OHNER NAME TAXPAYER • ’ ■38 08-117-23 93 0113 PROP ADOR 03980 NORTH SHORE' OR OHNER NAHE BRUCE A NUSBAUH TAXPAYER ■ BRUCE A NUSBAUH NAHE/AOOR'. 3980 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA NN 55391 • ' • 38 08-117-23 93 0021 03950 • NORTH SHORE DR OHI«R NAHE HILLIAH C ODDEN TAXPAYER HILUXAH C ODDEN 3950 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA HN 55391 PROP Al wiaR I TAXPAYI NAKE/AODR r. 9c PROP ADOR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR . • • 38 08-117-23 93 0029 03998 NORTH SHORE DR J 8 H ERLER JANES 8 MARY ERLER 3998.NORTH SHORE DR . HAYZATA HN 55391 r ( • raOP ADM ONNa NAH8 TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR I • V • • 38 08-117-23 93 0027 03960 BIRCH LA D S 8 D K INCVALSON DOUGLAS 8 DEBORAH INOVALSON 3960 BIRCH U HAYZATA HN 55391 • . • HEIdlEPXN COimTY PROPERTY BtfORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I; /' *•. $ 38 08-117-23 93 0001 03970 BIRCH LA T H BERNARD 8 L K BERNARD THONAS H BERNARD 3970 BIRCH U HAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 93 0019 03990 NORTH SHORE DR DAVID J LINDBERO DAVID J LINDBERO 3990 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA HN 65391 38 08-117-23 93 0022 03999 NORTH SHORE DR HILLIAH D ROBINSON H D ROBINSON 3999 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 93 0025 03958 NORTH SHORE DR A K EVANS 8 N K EVANS ANY K 8 NAOHl K EVANS 3958 NORTH SHORE OR HAYZATA NN 65391 38 08-117-23 93 0028 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND cm OF ORONO P 0 BOX- 66 ■ . CRYSTAL' BAY HN 65323 . I ^8 » fI • REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 3 • I • • •• • • 38 08-117-23 93 0012 03970 NORTH SHORE DR HAROLD J BROUELLETTE HAROLD J BROUELLETTE 3970 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA HN * 55391 38 08-117-23 93 0020 03992 NORTH SHORE DR GERALD J RAY ETAL GERALD J RAY 3992 NORTH SHORE DR HAYZATA KN 55391 38 08-117-23 93 0023 03950 BIRCH U E R ENGLER.8 B ENGLER EDWARD R 8 BOHNIE ENGLER •3950 BIRCH U • ■ HAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 93 00^6 03960 NORTH SHORE DR RONALD-TRUNAN CLOUD RONALD TRUNAN CLOUD . 3960 NORTH SHpRE DR ' HAYZATA HN 55391 • t TOTAL BATCH 602 00019 • * / • . • • « Hi • 0. « • : •». '1 j •. •* . /• •• i ; :• . .'I . •* • 4 •« t i•r *• - • V \.*0 .* • «• . *• ^ ‘ • i . . ••.V : • • :• • 7 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: RE: Kris Jenson, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner August 9,1999 #2509 Andrew Ronningen, 3030 Casco Point Road Variances —Public Hearing Zoning: LR-1C, One Family Lakeshore Residential District, 1/2 Acre Application: To construct a two-story, 22' x 24' addition to the existing home. STAFF SUMMARY The applicants have requested variances to construct a 2 story, 22' x 24' addition to their home. In order to approve this request, variances are required for Average Lakeshore Setback, as well as hardcover within the 75' - 250' zone. The site does not exceed structural coverage limits. The proposed addition will meet the existing roof line of the home, and will be approximately 16' at the peak. However, with the proposed addition, the site will exceed the allowed hardcover for the 75' to 250' zone. Eighteen patio blocks (18 so. ft.) are being removed for the addition, however. Staff feels that in there is a large amount of landscaping with plastic underlay that could be removed in order to allow for the addition and stay under the 25% hardcover allowed. Pertinent Ordinances: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 1, (B) No principal or accessory structure shall be located within 75 feet of the lakeshore nor closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 2, Lakeshore Hardcover and Land Alteration Regulations. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IC (1/2 acre) Lot Area Lot Width Lakeside Yard Side Yard, Street Side Yard Street Yard Required 21,780 s.f.100'75'10', 15'30' Proposed 30,927 s.f.97', 155'at 75' setback line 75'20', 20'48' H2J09 Andrtvf Ronningen, 3030 Casco Point Road Variance August 6,1999 page-I i I f Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0-75'9,375 s.f.4 s.f. (.4%) none (0%) 4 s.f (.4%) none 75-250'21,252 s.f.5,147.2 s.f. (24.2%) 5,313 s.f (25%) 5,657.2 s.f (26.6%) Permit more hardcover than allowed 250-500'300 s.f.152 s.f. (50.6%) 90 s.f (30%) 152 s.f (50.6%) none Structural Coverage I Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 30,927 s.f Existing: 2,841.6 s.f Proposed: 3,413.6 s.f 7% 11% Issues 1. The applicants state their hardship on the application form. 2. According to the hardcover calculations, there is 436 so. ft. of landscaping underlain by plastic. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance to allow construction of a two-story, 22' x 24* addition, provided that 350 square feet of landscaping area with plastic underlain, within the 75' to 250' zone is removed from the landscaping areas prior to construction of the addition. Exhibits: A B C D E F G Application Location Map Plat Map Survey Elevations Hardcover Calculations Neighboring Property Owners List §2509 Andrtw Ronningtn, 3030 Casco Point Road VarUmct August 6,1999 pogt-2 A Application # ^ Date Received" Amount Paid 2 gd CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S250.00 (S50.0Q per each additional variance) ' • Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from ori^al application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION ^ A . r> i Site Address____3030 0-CX5CQ rotAi ^ Property Identification Number fP.ID.) y /I'l —0^ ^ A-,jrropeny xaeuuncauon i'<iuiuuci \i. • r >___—v' - • Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Pr^erty^A cquired________io [^3 ___—^----------------------------^(month/year) ^ I (do) ^^n^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property*. 7^ residential ___other (specify) Zoning District: ___________________________ APPLICANT * ---------------^ ^ Name Kc^iAvl/nq^tn Phone(work)__ r. ^30 Ca^O fkMtAddress: 3030 Ga<^Ci OWNER Of different than applicant) Name _____- Phone fhome l ^ "730^4 Phone (wo City: CV2A^O 10 Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $___ _____ __ Describe request in detail: -fwa /€v^g I g t "f~« TS—T , , , (attacyidditiond sheets if necwsary) -ftTy--^4-/.- 1,.- ____ Y c\ C^CK , Lot Area Setback: Lot Width ___Hardcover Lot Coverage Front Side Rear K Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventmg compliance with Zoning Code requirements: "TTaC._----------------------------------------- s ac/iT av^^i our~ • (attach additional'sheets if necessary) j <rk,^ Vjcsi~ ?s neto srhce Ot/r -L'f“ Ts our uinder i hory^e. rc<=)^tre d^rs uaJrance. cTue s7f(/c^i-rdn. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following informatinn must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered completei • • • . 1.. ^ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form . Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map fi'om Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Sur/ey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover c^culations as required. In addition, pro^dde one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 814" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an inter^ in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. . Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. • • APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied js trujj and ^correeP^o the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature _« (XJ-V _________ *7— I OWNER’S SIGNA’xi^ivi:. The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purpose^of inyestig^troji and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature —’ Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to atte.^d a scheduled meeting, ple^e make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ' I !i ! : t I < ! : 1 i * r 1600 •Altt fMM M I I MfiTriClD MX ™ £ I SEE MAP 61 - 3-£\< §55rf®“lrtu m I #1 MINNETRISTA 2400 MOOtMl Mi 3200 .^5 Mtia at wiTs ^r^HanHarrison * - 'V'** V '•• .Langdon X^i^r Lai^e 0”fJi tMturj a¥nO 6* 5 ^ .•;■ ■ '< • ■ ' SEE MAP 00 i . V ,4l*iTU* I KMOilill V /v •'. Cfi*i¥fia>kv MOUND i <2^ te i-Kv : :-.V ,'.;• lifinnetdnka . »■ * r **.*<> • 1 x^vV- -};. • t • 'S'**'nm Boy-^ ■ --riV^c 1200 IIMUnfIfV %ri >•' • j.^- r /0 Maxwdl ; \EA V*'.? fe^/&ORONOf ’» .^!ri«ij':/i™,; ;;’ J. North - : . \\\‘' i •V Arm •• ' ✓=4i ; ..V, I .'ii4jri» /n\/TM ^ I i: ^ ^PRONp i: SHADY *• • a AktllCft lU^.f^lT 1 ATlkft^^ 7^-■• •*!'-^?t-,‘aA ^ \ ENCHANTED A 4.ISLAND.V'‘ <.* '.V.',. fys ^SHOREWOOD^^ *(S e E map 89 I 0 0 • ••'•i .• ••• ••** *. . *%. ■ • *• k"; * *% ’ ■ 'V* -■*• ** • • • • .•. •••-•/ •. v^-',-rv. •'Jrw . *. ^. ••. • - •• • • ^ • ‘ • . -V > •. •• t . I • • •# • . .. ' ^ :* ^ V •’ . * i : W. A*- ; ' *.T -K '* *’**.,■ V ••'* '•* • * ' *•*’ ••* * •.• • • • . • ' ♦■ L . •* • ' • .* . •t X I*. • • • 1 •«•• " 11 • *1I* ;« 1 •t t :( • 1 • *•. —j Tn~2 • • • ••mm •• • ■am piV^ r'llVAflOvI •. ■ general OQNTRACTOi ;S JEFF DANEEFC RO BOX 245 • SPRWG PAFiK. ivto mmcSOTA 55384 1 i J ni cMc^- fbr-tM ^ (Uetjzic^bccoAA^c. -rtt6 4/7jfe di-fftcdu- \x^ 'hmi. ,gwrveuo^<1 hardcover calculation 'WORKSHEET SETBACK ZQ^fCt CCStCLE C?fE) ( O-TaP J 7S-2SQ' 290*500* •/ •< SQO-tOOO* A. tieas9 V ' _•) 'x SLR WU9i • * f f «•• •X X X s ,i 9 % • SJ*. S.F. S.F. B. Qatafto • • C. Dcfwiwxjf S.P. X X S.F. S.F. D. SldevraOc X X S.F. S.F. E. Patb/Deek X X S.P. S.P. F. Lafldac«(« • UodgfULa By Plude X X X S.P. IS.F. _ S.F. O. Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERnr AREA IN ZOt^ ^ ^ B X 100 •» S.F. 5.F. % A. D gARDCOVER W Z _________________. JKt S.F. Lon^ti Wfdtti .< X X S.F. S.F. SS. B. C. Gam£) DttvMMy O. sidewalk S. PMfO/DMk F. Iaa<!scap< UcxfsUln By Ratcic S.F. S.F. S.F. S.P. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 5.F. S.P. O', Other S.P. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B ________ X 100 « • • S.F, S.F. % A B A B • ir% ^r% eRn* • 20*d 3l9f&^Z ▼3To»i/-vTn • •nt.t sKtriLjj ndt larcirte/^tMnexrvnm * urwj L 03 Aaa3aN«a 3H1 wcaj W«t^T:0T 666T-0T-S0 : \ • t *; } r.| •• . .• • HARDCOVER CALCULATIONJ\^RKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ ^----- ^ 250-500’ r.XTSTTNG HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House *2f\ X 500-1000’ Leojdi X X X B. Garaie C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landsc^e Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric O. Otner 22. /V !fb X X X X X X X X Xae TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL P^PERTV AREA IN ZONE .: A prqpqse ;d hardcover in zone ' XA. House B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Palio/Deck F; Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric ^3. Other Leocci X x X 3e: N 52- X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ei ss im S.F. WId:h S.F. • sr S.F. S.F. Klh S.F. ► ,• •• • 2%5 • S.F. =S.F. rs • S.F. ss S.F. g.S.F. s S.F. /iP>S.F. mm =S S.F. to ss /ZX)S.F. 2. S3 Ul.0>S.F. S.F. *2J2Se,S.F. 2/^2- X100 ss % Bl -S.F. WldOi 22- ^SS S.F. =S.F. ss S.F. j2j£>S^<2.S.F. ss 256S S.F. s:S.F. ss S.F. --------------------------------------'S3 • 50 S.F. ^.5' •/2>/.i^S.F. s:S.F. >ZJ£0 S.F.WE S.F. A/ l.l/p S.F. @51^___S.F. A B A B 9'UMqoyz- • •• #• •••’IT • ^ #• • • • • HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSBIEST SETBACK ZON^! (CERCI.B 0?4E> C-'TS* \ .>• r .• 990*ieeo*• • i:x3srp<G HA<u>CQVZ^B , Aui Hems T ,• * t___x SJr. WUft X . X X 6JP. S.P. S.Tj 0 • 0 • B. .Q«r>e»• • • * C. Dclv«w«gr 9JP. /V X X D. S!i!A^ilk X a B. l>*Uo/I>edc X X F. Lodicap* UBdednio By Rtftie .X X X O. Otlier TOTAI. HABDCOVBH G< ZONB TOTAL PROPfiRfY i\RSA IN ZONE / <2^___ + B 3^<y X 100 « pgQPfVtPn HABnrnVEP IN ZONF. A. Heoss ____________ X UBtik X X X TOTAL hardcover IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA W ZONE + 8_ _ X 100 • •• m 0 ^ • fO’d 9T9f6P3 Oi OD AddBENya 3H1 riAif i-vwrtrvm S.F. 5.F. S.P. S.P. S.P. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ^ ft S.F. S.F. S.P. S.F. S;F. S.P. 9.F. S.F. S.F. S.P. S.F. &.P. S,F. 5.P. S.F. S.P. S.P. « /P| A B A 8 OLTV? • triwJ WOdd UW3T;0T 666T-0T-80 1 I '*• V* *. • . • * • , MM DATE 17/20/99 . I " 'BATCH 5«B« • SB 20-117-25 SB 0001 MOP ADOR OSOS5 CASCO POXHT RD . • . OWNER NAME T BERTHIAONE/C KACMENMEISTER TAXPAYER THOHAS B BERTHXAUHE ' NAHE/AODR SOSS CASCO POINT ROAO •, NAYZATA MN B5S91 c / Aw V.. HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHAnON SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 20-117-2S SB OOOS 0S015 CASCO POINT RD R 0 LAURIE ETAL R 0 UURIE S015 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 .O:. PROP AMR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR • ;.r- PROP AODR • OWNER NAME ■■ TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR . . PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER • NAME/ADDR PROP AODR OWNER NAME •TAXPAYER . NAME/ADDR SB 20-117-23 SB 0025 0S020 CASCO POINT RD e 1IND6REN JR 8 B LINDOREN E LINDOREN JR I B LINDOREN 3020 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 SB 20-117-23 B2 0035 OSiiSS IVY PL B 0. LINDOREN SEA LINDOREN B D LINDOREN SEA LINDOREN 3535 IVY PL NAYZATA MM 55391 SB 20-117-23 BS 0037 .00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED DONALD JAMES KAVANA6H • DONALD J KAVANA6H SOSB CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391' • • $ • ! 1 • • • •. TOTAL BATCH 508"99012 ;• . 58 20-117-23 3B 0029 03029 CASCO POINT RD TRACEY L MORROW TRACEY L MORROW 3029 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 BS 0035 030B0 CASCO POINT RD J H MOOAN ETAL JOHN S SUSAN HOGAN B932 EMERSON AVE S MPLS MM 55B09 • 38 20-117-23 B3 0051 030SB' CASCO POINT RD SCOTT A REDIGER SCOTT A REDIGER S03B CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 • • REPORT NO. PIB35401 PAGE 19 38 20-U7-2S SB 0012 030B5 CASCO POINT RD ' R A RASTERS SBC KASTENS RICHARD A/DARBARA C KASTENS S0B5 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 B2 0029 03526 IVY PL D L CUMMINGS S M M CUNNINGS DANIEL L 8 MARTHA H CUMMINGS 3525 IVY PL NAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0039 03038 CASCO POINT RO ' DONALD JAMES KAVANA6H DONALD J KAVANAGH 3038 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 BS 0052 03030 CASCO POINT RO K M FORSS S A V RONNINGEN A RONNINGEN 8 K FORSS 3030 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 65391 I . I « • ■ * I' ! * ; * • y c:* . (v OV, . • • ^ . MI . J J •J _) • •• •, • I ' i > .; •.I. I I • % w/ • * I J J• • • • • • • « •4K \ • TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator Kris Jenson, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner August 9, 1999 #2513 Connie Piepho, 540 North Arm Drive Variances-Public Hearing Zoning: LR-1 A, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 2 Acres Application: To permit construction of an inground swimming pool. STAFF SUMMARY • This application is for an average lakeshore setback to permit construction of an inground ix)ol at 540 North Arm Drive. For swimming pools, the setback is measured from the water basin to the property line. The size of the setback is set by the size of the basin, which in this case is 830 sq. ft., large enough to classiiy it as an oversized structure, requiring 15' from the property line. The pool itself (the water area) is currently proposed at 13’ from the side property line, where 15' is required. Staff does not support a variance for the side yard setback. The area surrounding the pool is allowed to encroach into the sideyard setback provided it is not at a height greater than that of the main floor of the home. No part of the pool would be allowed to encroach into the 5' Drainage and Utility Easement which runs along the side property line. The survey shows boulders to be located within die easement, which is not permitted. As Staff was researching information for this variance, it discovered that the secondary septic site is located between the home and the cunent septic system site. The Septic Code requires all structures to be located at least 20’ from the septic site. Therefore, the pool cannot be located in the proposed area. If the appUcant wants to proceed with the application as is, it will require approval from Chris Pence, City of Orono Septic Inspector. Staff would not be in favor of a reduced setback and feels it is highly unlikely that it would be granted. However, there is another option. Staff suggests that the applicant contact S-P Testing Inc., who did the original septic work on the site. If they could identify an acceptable secondary septic site that meets the required setbacks elsewhere on the lot, then an area would be cleared for the pool. A sketch of the drainfield sites has been included with this report. The outline of the house is slightly different, as it’s labeled "proposed house", but the scale is the same as the survey included with this memo. By comparing this to the included survey, it shows the edge of the proposed pool area in the same area as the comer of the drainfield, and that is before the pool is shifted to meet the side yard setbacks. t23l3 CormU Pltpho, 540 North Arm Drht Variancis August 9 • 1999 pagt-l 2. There are several options with this application. They are as follows: 1. Planning Commission votes on the application as submitted, with variances for average lakeshore setback and side yard setback, subject to the applicant receiving approval from the Septic Inspector for encroachment into the secondary drainfield site. Staff does not recommend approval of the variances. The applicant moves the pool out of the sideyard setback, still requiring a variance for average lakeshore setback. This would also require approval of the Septic Inspector. Staff is willing to recommend approval of the average lakeshore setback variance, however, they still feel that the Septic Inspector would not allow the structure within the secondary drainfield. The applicant requests the matter be tabled, to allow them the opportunity to work with the original septic designers to find an alternative secondary site. If this is successful and receives approval from the septic inspector, then the matter could come back to the Planning Commission, with Staff recommending approval of the average lakeshore setback to place the pool (Staff would not recommend approval of the side yard setback variance). 3. Pertinent Ordinances: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 1, (B) No principal or accessory structure shall be located within 75 feet of the lakeshore nor closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots.. 2. Section 10.03, Subd. 9, (E) Setbacks. Accessory structures in excess of 750 square feet footprint area but not exceeding 1,000 square feet footprint shall be located at least 15 feet from any lot line. 3. Please see the section from the Septic Ordinance defining setback requirements in the exhibits. Please note that the Planning Commission does not have the authority to grants variances to the Septic Code, only the Septic Inspector may approve the request ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IA Lot Area Lot Width Lakeside Yard Side Yard Street Yard • • Required 2 Acres 200'75'30'50' Proposed 2.7 Acres 245'78' (from pool toOHWL) 29.9', 13’252' to shed, 282.T to house §2513 Comk Pltpho, 540 North Arm Drive VarlOKes August 9,1999 page-2 Hardcover Distance Total Area Existing Allowed Proposed from Shoreline in Setback Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover 0-75'27,612 s.f.Os.f.none Os.f. (0%)(0%)(0%) 75-250’54,334 s.f.8,995 s.f.13,583.5 s.f.10,819 s.f. (16.6%)(25%)(19.9%) 250-500’38,349 s.f.3,606 s.f.11,504.7 s.f.3,606 s.f. (9.4%)(30%)(9.4%) ! STAFF RECOMMENDATION ► Staff recommends the matter be tabled to allow the applicant to have another secondary drainfield site identified in order to place the pool between the house and the lake. Exhibits: A B C D E F G H Application Lotion Map Plat Map Survey Septic Ordinance P.equirements Site Plan with drmnfield sites identified Hardcover Calculations Neighboring Property Owners List .* ... « . . . . §2513 Connk Pitpho, 540 North Am Drtvt VartancMS AuguttO, 1999 pagt-5 • *•*. •___•4 • i •. AppTicalibn # ^01^ Z Date Dficeiv ^ '^1 ^ ' • • \ CriY or ORONO - variance application . Initial Application Fee S250.00 . ($50,00 per each additional variance) . • ’ •’ Renew^ Variance Fee $150.00 ■ '• • • (no change from ori^al application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees Rouble application fee) • • i j. . i HROPERTir DtFOJ^TiqN, . / ^ Site Address ■ -TViP /Uo/2^ Mm. Property Identification Number (PXD.)_ a t- f 1 J • 4* \ riOptny lacnnncauon i^uuiu^i ^-------------------:— ----------------^----;-----:---- Attach legal description to application if not mcluded on required survey. . Date Property Acquired,_____] _1__—i— -----^ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent p^cels of land. -r%____A. •______ ' V/ other (Present use of property: V readential I other (specify). Zoning District:. Phonefhomel ^ — TJ.m. fm/lh ! Ct^7797^ rocs^u^ Phone(work)I2X3 Si- City;.____^__________Ztp: • • • .mBtn 9 OWNER @ different.than^pplicant) . . — T~~VC ^ ^ riflmft _ Phone (work) Phone fliomel ^PJX ^9 _____________________ DESCRiraON OF BEQUEST • • ^ . • * Estimsted ConstruQtion Cost S ^.^^/QOrO ^ .U (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ._Width Lot Coverage . • I •*. Setback:Front ’• •.■•Side'--^ *• . Hardcover • •• Rear' ^ ’ )C Average Lakeshore • *. • Other (specify) HAKDSHIP/DESCKIPnON OP UNUSUAL PROPERTV CONDmONS Describe undue hardship or practical compliance with Zoning Code rwuirements: ,/ (attach additional sheets if necessary) •n 07/20/1999 10:02 T0*d -WlOi 612546875S ■ » FOX COMMJNICATIONS PAGE 03 BEQV]SUBMnTALS AH of the foUewIn^ iTiTormation n»»t hi _subm!tt»Lhy tbe apolicAtlon t order for votir npolicaHoo to be consldw^ compl-et^t 2. X 3. Completed ^plication Fonn . Cer^ed Property Owners Ust of owners within 150*, libels «n 1 jSu ioip (ycni must obteln tlus llst» libels sod map from Hennepin CounQ Department of Finance, A-603. Govt Center, >S»aW). 3irS -S~y/a Certificate of Suiv^ (slso^ by t licensed suxv^r) and include hardcover eadtine date hi X «V4- X 11* for 5. 6, .7. 8. required. In ed£tioc^ provide reproduction. Topographic surv^ (odsting and proposed devatlons) if ai^ chhngea in edtUng grade are proposed. In ad£doo, provi^ one (1) copy 8V&* x IP for reproduction. Sketdies or plans of floor & devation views ^ovide one <1) espy 8V&* x 11"). ’ list of the names 0ndude marital status) of all persons w th an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of qpp1ieant(s) if sot ament ownd(s). As an addendum to this tppDcatioxv please attach a leparate : ist of May other persons you ^msh notified of tins implication. Additional items as may be requested by City eta£ The Applicant and Property Owner must sign tins epplicatioa Please ren eoober that xjuir variance appHemtinn' fa net enmplete If the above infonaation has not I • . • •• • • IndaddL APPLICANTS SIGMATmCE The applicant hereby egreei' to provide ell information required or request^ by the Zoning Adminlstritof, agrees to pay ad^onal fees (staff time not covered by oii^^ fte payment) and/or consultant eiqpeoses incurred in review of tide application, and ^eriifiea that the infoimatlon supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature sd OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby adcnowlediges and agrees to tins appheatioo and further aut^iues reasonable entry onto the property by City stafi^ consultants, agents, Commisaion memqi^ and Council members for purposes of mvestigation and verificatioa of this request _______Date T//Owner's Signature Applicant must have all submittals into the Chy offices 25 days befiire the Planning Monday of each of the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commistion Meetings are hdd on the tidrd month. Applicants must be present at an scheduled review meetings Commission and CouncIL If an applieanl is* unable to attend a schedule .meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized ageot attend in yp\jr place and to aU vise the BuOifing & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. T0'd eS^^2CE^l9 :St 666t“6t-Tlf . 07/20/1999 10:02 tO*d *W10i 612546875G FOX COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 02 1 _ • • Adjftccat Property Owners* Aeltnewledgtmt&t Fom * P\ of Arv t- (print name(s)](print address] • ^ * ha%-e revirrved the cbas for the proposed intp/ovs.Tiect or proposed use of the at /lAPAfe^Ogy also rtfexied to aa ^as Land Use Application No. \>>0-fl-OroK. ptop^ looted 1 (wa) understand that in executing this icknowledgement, I (we) am (m) not to declare approval or disapproval of the prppeny or use but merely to cofl^ for the Oty ; Cduac3 that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed sd^ibor*s • CSSIlyQ^. j/!AC. j Property Owner ' ^2m Date Property Owner Date • Itsi) ^'i mfMu. of Aw\ Z>)iig- [pdtrf name(8)]^ {print address]. I ‘ have reviewed the pltts for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property *1 0(L. also refened to as Land Use Applicatioo No. _____ I (we) understand that in executing this aclmowtedgemeo^ I (we) am (i te) not to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but mer^ to coni nn fbr the City Cot^ that I (we) am (are) aware of the iinpfovement plans and that; the pre posed o^^hbofa Foject or use requires Coundl approval. 3 1 Property Owns/Date 7- Date . ^ infonnatioa that mty assist the City in the review < Application, please submit your comments to ^e Building St 2onlng Offl^ prior to the scheduled meeting date. ; this Land Use t. least 10 days 8 T0‘d 6SEEEI6ET9 St e66t-6t-Tir I . SEE MAP 47 MIMIICailM •lUI CSf4M nMMiit 61 ,. Batcer Park Reserve ifili TNI UTI ■itcca INDEPENDENCE lATlifmM • ••••••,NAIIIT0N WtMUMM •Ul> 5 3 VUTMAMMM MINNETRISTA ••.V to '.r./'.rj.v; rwvJ'Vt . ... V©__ Imtf J t CE I / r»8 ■Mfl TWI ftiTS i !s I UBlIMUMi SEE MAP 7S~^ © MftM ii m ^’^/enntngs i I'- •ATtM ORONO Mi>wiirwfNfw a u scuatti^M / V' ^5 '»r; V0 Maxwell -V^’®^rr-v /7 v ’ > . C<V' >rt m >•; § I f I, ./ •'*-.• - . ^ ,... a fw & •• OniOT B (6) O K • • « » !,• Setbacks^ The minimum setback distance areguirfements are as foilows! . . Feature Water Supply V7ell . Wetland •. Lake: • % ■ .• • •. General .Development Recreational Development Katural Environment Tributaries# Streams /driveways# Sidewalks# Decks# y and other Hardcover Property Lines # Buildings and Buried.Pipes ^awn Sprinkler Systems Sewage Tank ^d Soil Treatment Area 75* 75* 2, Sewage Tanks, The minimum sewage tzink size requirements are as follows:- Ko, of Bedrooms 4 or less 5 or 6 7, 8 or 9 .io or more Tank Liquid Capacities... (Gal> )■ 1000+1000 Regardless of ' garbage disposal use , . 1250+1000 1500+1500 : Sewage tanks shall be sized as **other" establishment* per' Subp. 3 Sec, B in MPCA Regulations Chapter 7080.0130 3 Pumping Stations, In order to standardize Regulations Chapter 7080: (a) Electrical*Connection;............... (1) A water-tight# lockable electrical box must be mounted on a 4x4 inch treated redwood or ceaar .post, . All electrical connections shall * be made within the box. Pump connection must direct line (plug in only). Wire entry to the electrical box shall be sealed with putty. Alarm and pump floats shall be on separate electrical circuits. ORONO CC 496-1 (2-10-92) i • J! •I • •} t . A i f .. • ‘ • • • • sUU?l. ifplllipi ^<jrf|c9M« al^pj jJtlUiS• § IfW fftiHt f%9 TlUi l»U§ ftoi^M » ______1#^^ tiTatetaO__________ OnreetollM Ikitt Scali'.i^ ITL* ;XSoS BorlriQS eemfi Itok PROPERTY 0T« niTns^G K/iU. U^U, Nott* TNi lyitm b to b« ecminietod to iMtt totUnMitfo PoB u U im Cortrti Agtney ' Chapter 7080 t Local Ordinance Note • •••» • •• •••t Cheek all underground utilities ^CAJit S-PTESrmMi^^ Oedgnetf i. D0lt>Ji/a.f3f, PH. 68-497-3966 • . •\ \ • I * ■! T\ • I .»• e t weu, SCTEAC.K.UN6 f-1^ o^^ot=- -rvvtsw vfMMo t»»ftti ^r* ^/^^.oi4.5rnr-^ ovA .. B. ‘Garase * •• •. s- ..' • • • C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Pado/Deck F. Landac^e Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ^ A *. B xioo • . . • PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X B. Gar^e C. Driveway D. Sidewalk . *• • • • E. Patio/Deck F; Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Ocher TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ' TOTAI.™^AmZONE^ . • •• • • RUN OATS 07/19/99 BATCH 5b9 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY ZNFORHATXON SYSTEH . PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PACE 39 • •PROP ADDR SB* 06>117-25 31 0005 00520 NORTH ARH DR OWNER NAHE. TXKOTHY PELLIZZER TAXPAYER TXHOTHY PELLIZZER NAHE/ADOR 520 NORTH ARH DR HOUND HN 55304 • • L so 0A-117-2S 31 0009 ‘ PROP ADDR 00500 NORTH ARN DR OWNER NAHE H D I N J NOV . TAXPAYER ' ' HATTHEN 0 0 HEIDZ J HOY NANE/ADDR • 500 NORTH ARH DR HOUND HN 55304 :<• . • • %PROP ADDR . • OWNER NAHE’ ' I ' . TAXPAYER *. TOTAL DATCH NANE/ADDR • *. 509 00000 ^ • • • . •• . • «. t • T • . \ • •t ..1^ - • ••• • f • • • • \ f . I • • t ••••#. .• ’ * .*• • • • •. • .♦, I • • *, • • » »• i •• .• .•V •' • • •• I • • 1:. • .*• 30 00-117-23 31 0000 00540 NORTH ARH OR CONNIE K PIEPHO ' CONNIE K PIEPHO 540 NORTH Am DR . HOUND HN »304 • 30 00-117-23 31 0007 . 00500 NORTH ARH OR ■ T I S HAZER THOHAS D I SUSAN S HAZER 560 NORTH.ARH DR HOUND HN 55304 . /• , • 30 00-117-23 82 0003 00405 NORTH ARN DR LAXEVIEH 60LP OP H1KA INC LAKEVIEH eOLP OF HTKA INC 055 RED OAK U t HOUND HN 55304 . SO 00-117-23 42 0000 00030 . ADDRESS UNASSIONED VICTORZA ESTATES NOHEOWNERS VICTORZA ESTATES NOHEOWNERS C/O THOHAS HAZER 500 NORTH ARH DR HOUND HN 55304 i • *•* • •• J • 0 * • t 0• • • * .! • •• • • • • f•• • • • , t I .!• I CERTIFY THAT THE PACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AKD TRUE ‘ REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATIOH AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST OF HY KNOHLEDOE AND BEUEF. i DATE r> • •• • * } ■■ • • • • • • •• • • TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator Kris Jenson, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner August 9,1999 #2515 Tom and Maureen Palm, 1685 Concordia Street Variances—Public Hearing Zoning: LR-1C, One Family Lakeshore Residential District 1/2 Acre Application: To construct a new garage in a new location, as the existing garage is partially located widiin a sewer easement. STAFF SUMMARY Tom and Maureen Palm have submitted an application to construct a lew 30' x 30' garage in a different location than the existing 24' x 26' garage, as it is partially located over a sewer easement. The existing garage is located 98' from the rear property line (street side). The proposed garage would be located 48 feet from the same property line. The proposed garage is 30' x 30', for a 900 sq. ft. structure. Because the structure is defined as oversized, due to the fact that it is larger than 750 sq. ft., the sideyard setbacks are required to be 15', rather than the district 1 O' standard. The applicant's could reduce the size of the garage to 750 sq. ft. by reducing the garage 5' in depth. This would allow the applicant's to maintain a 3 car garage, and still meet the 1 O' setback requirements. The proposed height of the garage is 23'. This lot is over on hardcover, although the proposal will reduce the hardcover, due to the garage being moved to the rear of the lot. The question is how much the Commission wants the hardcover reduced. The other issue is structural coverage. The lot currently sits at 14.9% structural coverage. Pertinent Ordinances ► Section 10.22, Subd. 2, Lakeshore Hardcover and Land Alteration Regulations. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. Within 250 to 500 feet of the shoreline there shall be no more than 30% hardcover. »• Section 10.03, Subd. 9, Accessory Buildings, (E) Setbacks. Accessory structures in excess of 750 square feet footprint area but not exceeding 1,000 square feet footprint area shall be located at least 15' from any lot line. »• Section 10.03, Subd. 14, Yards and Open Spaces, (C) Lot Coverage. In all zoning districts, for all lots of 0-1.99 acre in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the lot area. The following shall be included U25iy Tom A hiaumn Palm, 1685 Concordia Street Variances August 9, 1999 pagt-l in calculation of lot coverage by structures: 1. All roofed structures which extend more than 6' above grade level. 2. Tennis courts, patios, decks, and all similar "open" structures when partially or fully enclosed by fences, railings or walls which extend more than 6' above grade level (if any portion of such structures extends more than 6' above grade level, the entire structure shall count toward lot coverage. T>ot Area and Yards ANALYSIS LR-IC (1/2 acre) Lot Area Lot Width Lakeside Yard Side Yard Street Yard Required 21,780 s.f 100'75'10'(15'for larger garage) 30' Proposed 14,200 s.f 50.04 ’200’+10'48' Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0-75'3,876 s.f 862 s.f (22%) none (0%) 862 s.f (22%) none 75-250 ’ with 900 s.f garage 9,060 s.f 3,085 s.f (34%) 2,265 s.f (25%) 2,774 s.f (30.6%) Permit more hardcover than allowed (Reduced from existing) 75-250 ’ with 750 s.f garage 9,060 s.f 3,085 s.f (34%) 2,265 s.f (25%) 2,624 s.f (28.9%) Permit more hardcover than aIlowed.(Reduced from existing) 75-250 ’ with 642 s.f garage •* 9,060 s.f 3,085 s.f (34%) 2,265 s.f (25%) 2,516 s.f (27.7%) To permit additional hardcover 250-500'1,263 s.f 411 s.f (32.5%) 378.9 s.f (30%) 426 s.f (33.7%) To permit additional hardcover ♦*lf the existing-size garage were required in the new position, the driveway would most likely narrow due to the fact that it would not be a 3 car garage. It is possible that the driveway could be reduced by about 100 sq. ft, leaving a hardcover percentage then of 26.6%. U2515 Tom d Maurten Palm, 1685 Concordia Street Variances August 9. 1999 pagt~2 y^tructural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 14,200 s.f.Existing: 2,116 s.f.14.9% Proposed: 2,373 s.f. (900 s.f. garage)16.7% Possible: 2,223 s. f. (750 s.f. garage)15.6% Allowed: 2,129 s.f.15.0% Issu&s 1. 2. 3. 4. Garage can meet the 750 sq. ft. maximum to meet the 10’ sideyards and still provide parking for 3 vehicles (Reduce depth by 5') Applicant should be asked for hardship circumstances. Staff acknowledges the reason for relocating the garage off the sewer easement, however, the new garage is 40% larger than the existing garage. Total hardcover will be reduced on the site with the proposed new 900 sq. ft. garage, but it could be reduced even further by a 750 sq. ft. garage, or a garage the size of the existing garage (24.2’ x 26.5'). Structural Coverage is currently at 14.9%. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of a hardcover variance for the 75 ’-250' zone with a proposed hardcover of 30.6% where 34% exists now and 25% is allowed, as well as a variance for the side yard setback to be 10’, where 15 ’ is required, for the construction of a 30’ x 30’ (900 sq. ft.) detached garage, and a variance for structural coverage on the lot, where 15% is allowed, 14.9% currently exists and 16.7% is proposed. Exhibits: A B C D E F G H Application Applicant’s Letter of Hardship Location Map Plat Map Survey Elevations Hardcover Calculations Neighboring Property Owners List M2SIS Tom & Maurtin Palm. 1685 Concordia Street Variances August 9.1999 page-5 parking ison for ;er than e, but it Existing roposed ; for the [900 sq. dlowe^ 'iTOiJiWafW RliH mv liTtmar* TCIXWT rir^runr*f:uw ?3™mmsi s MWfl ro«p.i9i«i iTthl iTiNI r«iui ^nnut # : BEQTJIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the applicatipn_dgAdline ^gtg_in order for your application to be considered complete: . 1. 2. X 3. X Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 1501,^ labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map fi-om Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8!4" x 11 for reproduction. 4 Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in exis^g 5. 6. 7. 8. __________ ... . 5 flf grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8Vi" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views provide one (1) copy 814" x 11"). List of the legal names Occlude marital status) of all persons with an interest in . .the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not wrrent owner(s). " ^ • • As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. /•A; % The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that XSST variance application is not complete if the above information has not been mcludcdi j;' ■ • ••. • ■ \’ - • Vo ■ APPLICANT'S SIGNATUREAPPLICANT'S 51GWATUKL ... . . - The applicant hereby agrees to provide all mformation required or requested by the Zonmg^^,-.- ... Administrator, agrees to pay additional fesi (staff time not covered by original fee payment) «« . _________ ;_____fViie or>r>1irQfinn flnrl tViat tllftand/or consultant expenses incurred in re>new of this application, and cei^es that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Sigusture Date 7//a/9S OWNER’S SIGNATURE ... , i The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City stafi^ consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • • • Owner's Signature Date -7)1^)^^ AppUcant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Plannmg Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, ptee make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the BuUdmg & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Iflwtlv*] tV.WtWt lunjm^tfhldi^i r«Hc« liJOlt ii]^tTiiir*in«j ^rnTiTZtTOi rtfTtTijo] rtHct lOTiTtltWiTi ■ iltl* i!iS wl Mt^^TTirKTr r*Mi|*>f 9 J t J t ,1, • 19 f •I 111-- :nnp .iiw7 •ItMACt 21 July, 1999 The City Of Orono Re: Hardship Description of Unusual Property Conditions Our desire is to re-build our existing garage. It was built in the 1 970 ’s prior to our purchase of the property in 1 988. We understand that the east end of the garage is located on the sewer line easement To correct this mistake of the previous owner, we are willing to move the garage closer to the street by approximately 43 feet There are four significant positive results in doing this: 1 ) It will eliminate the sewer easement problem 2) It will align our garage with our south neighbor’s garage. 3) It will reduce overall hardcover in the 75-250 feet zone. 4) It will allow for a better drainage system for our south neighbor during heavy rains. The conditions on this 50-foot wide property are unique to this property alone, and do not apply generally to other property In this zoning district This adjustment on our property will not adversely affect neighboring properties, but will enhance the value, consistency and aesthetics of the n?:lghborhood. It is for these reasons that we respectfully request a variance. Thank you for your consideration, Sincerely, Tom Palm 1 685 Concordia Street Wayiata, MN 5539 i Y ,0 a 0 • w I 1600 s Miiraio MINNETRISTA 8 a \ 2400 V009U8I % % ^ 5 amnJer \ SEE MAP 61 .Jenntngs mim fjjit !*•*•** iii»i © 5 f J 3V a IfIVMti\rfe- 2000 ’n ^ _JiS-r. / f i . ^IMSMU Harrison vnmooo IMAVK L.®l^M240^C •utH m V ‘SAS-’U ^ '•. f * »4l¥tT U ‘ ' t^MAnn n 1^ 'i%k^ 3200 t Uluff . 40UM v'/ ■ ' '■ ;-t jt» *0i*» *• ■ \ < ’, :koks '-'Bayr'^r:^ v;., rV;A%/ 'rvifu i)X/N /- ^ .t . . i <jy 4000 i N -••,’-,1 -i I • ,' ‘ , •' * '■»>'■* I ■“». lyXake '^Minneton^ . !•'. toV V -------V. >';.V SEE MAP 69 I pe''>:■: "«.' •■ li'Ti -f ' I - 1 * . • • •*Tv** ..'. ^ %4' \f'/ .’« V. •,. i • n m mrr^l!»s i ;*• */^\Carman r ..-•'i^TV; v 1/* ••i >•tv . '* V ^■'V' Ara<>y &PRONG ' Jv*' “**■*'' ’ ^ 1^^’-m •y • • ? . • .V .• -<:' e u rtD ir%A/r\ r\■M *(f4* 4,! 1 »^* <>>• '#,• ►»./ SHOREWOOD. a ■ i & u tj / / 55^ S'? ^ f,^i ,/•of 5 I I 'f.. If ~/ <3/ I. I > // — in \M.£Vt (74)'is? §147.31,4 si ® 1^144.33 I (S=§) 7 1 Q o=a(66) • ^ «y//4 ‘oj <V> 't fi? i 91.06 RES •': y\ \ ro; 50 50 144.33 50 12 §g Il8 rsj o200(69)(68) xT..- 50 50 50 I I s--/ 150 8 (30) 9 (31) 180 ISO 14 ^ (87) t£ (45) ( II 44) ( 10- 43) 9 io /t.- 50 (S C ® (33) ,80 ^ Q 1' ” (3 6do50Q T So507A 50 50 50 50 50 t XT..» m» 8 ^5 0 CM CNJ 00200203200to200002o4MT (48)(49)(50)(e 74 50 50 50 50 50 c K '-OOC 50615767n~zw\ II (9) 714. 15 WEST i L S TRACT A <rm •. TRACT B 184.27 (3) 1525.72 R ( . . ««*r r: • i2i rsj .rw 283.28 WEST ,. >; TRACT C '^«o- 279.71 C43) 25 300.: ) WEST (24) ^ ® (23)"'^"r 8 ' \15 tin . N—r?n in h- 1 262.3 1 1 14r(20) 261.2 m in i 1 13 (19) 260 fUU) inr- S_ 8 28 (30)• • • / 8 7 17/117/71 PAIM TOM ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO, S300S.llwy.No.l01 Minncloiika. MN 5534S Phono (612) 474 7964 I'u (612) 474 8267 SURVEY FOR: TOM PALM SURVEYED: July, 1999 LEOAL DESCRIPTION: DRAFTED: July 21.1999 The Nocth 50 Seti of LoC 16» CoITcc*3 AditiUoa to Shady Wood Lake Minnetonka, llcanepia County, Minnesota, score OF WORK: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal inatlcr. Please check the legal descriptioo with your records or consult with oompeteot legal counsel, if neoessary, to make suro that it is correct, and that any maUers of record, such u easements, that you wish shorn on (he survey, have been shown. 2. Showing the location of existing improvements we deemed Important 3. Setting new moQuments or verifying old monuments to mark the cofoets of the property. While we show proposed improvcmenls to your property, wearenot as familiar with your plans as you are nor art we as familiar with the requirements of goranmcotal agencies as their employees art. We suggest that you review the survey to conUrm that the proposals are what you intend and submit the survey to such govemmcotal ageocics u may have Jurisdiction ow your project to gain their appim^ if you am. STANDARD SYMBOLS A CONVENTIONS: ” 0 ” Dcootes 1/2” ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9233, set, unless otherwise noted CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify that this survc}' was prepared by mo or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Engineer and a Profossional Surveyor under the Laws of the Stale of Minnesota. ICS H. Parker P.B. A P.S. No. 9235 GRAPHIC SCALE • M m Aug-02-99 01 :5bP OO OOOOOOO P.Ol Mi COniSTRUC-TIOIV Design, Inc. 4a08 Umpngmtrs Lina • MlrnatortiB. MN S534S eaUTM NORTH • WI*T C-35*e«11 553*9362 ^4*0220 F S o.1) p License .#20022883 « Bonded » Insured Well Done ie Better Than Well Said HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 75-250'250-500*500-1000' VYISTTNG HARDCOVER TN ZONE A. House ______________ W;dLh B. Garage C Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Pali:<^3eci0 F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B ____X 100 ppnpnSF-D HARDCOVER IN ZONE NOME A. House______________^ ------ Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X 4 4 CRT S.F. SS. SI. SI. •S.F. SI.• SJ.m SI. SJ. __ITB _SI. SJ. S.F. S.F.- S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZOtfE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B ___ % ) B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. SS. SJ. S.F. S.F. SI. S.F. S.F. S.F. X 100 - • SJ. SJ. ” % A B r • hardcover calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-7y r.XTSTTNG HARDCOVER TN ZONE A. House _____________ ^ 75-250’250-500* LcnfJ)Width B. Garage C Driveway D. SidewaOc E Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X Pft x-cYi X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B ___X 100 PI^OPQSE^ HARDCO YFiP ^ Z:ONE A. House ______________ Lcagih X X X X width B. Garage ^ C Drivewy 'WA D. Sidewalk E Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X ^nYcV\ _ X ----- total hardcover in zone total property area in zone + B ___xlOO - 500-1000' C.\C> SJ. SI. SI. SI. g>4»3) S.F. \ 91 \ SI. SI. S&S S.F. SJ. SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. \10_LS.F. *^08 S s,F. ^oq.q1si. <a\C» SI. SI. SI. S.F. A B -S.F. j SSSl-SJ'. SI. \ A8 SJ. S.F. S.F. SJr. S.F. S.F. ilQ__S.F. _______ t: ■^Q-Ca ' S.F. A ” S.F. B ‘ Vo • ^ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) O-TS*75-250’250-500’ EYT5rrTNr. hardcover tn zone A. House ______________ Lrrjgth X X X B. Garage C Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B X 100 - pPOPOSED BARDCOy T-R IN ZONE A. House ______________ * Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway h>rV D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Dcck X X 4 F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVL.'' IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B ____X 100 - L 500-1000’ S.F. SI. SI. S.F. S.F. AM SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. S.F. SJ. S.F. AW S.F. VZ^'h S.F. A B S.F. SJf. S.F. ST. S.F. ST. 4TE ST. ST. ST. S.F. S.F. ST. S.F. S.F. ST. 4 • A.^C, -SI. A V S.F. B .• I Z'hZLJ'o RUN DATE Q7/12/9P HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PXA35401 PACE 24 BATCH 507 PROP AODR OWNER NANS TAXPAYER NANE/AODR SO 17-117-2S 22 0021 01705 CONCORDIA ST JANET JACODSON SACHS .JANET SACHS 7545 17TH AV SO RICHFIELD HN 55423 3« 17-117-23 22 0022 01M5 CONCORDIA ST T L PALH AHA PALH THOHAS L PALH 1685 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA HN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0023 01695 CONCORDIA ST D J A 0 R BELAWSKX DONALD JOHN BELAWSKX 3819 COLORADO AVE N CRYSTAL HN 55422 PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 38 17-117-23 22 0024 01687 CONCORDIA ST J N GEHRINC/K REINKE 6EHRIN6 JOHN A KRISTIN 6EHRING 1687 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA HN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0030 01740 CONCORDIA ST D J BELAWSKX ADC BELAWSKl DAVID J A DAYNA C BELAWSKX 1740 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA HN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0031 01690 CONCORDIA ST ROBERT H EHFXELD ROBERT H EHFIELD 1690 CONCORDIA ST ORONO HN 55391 PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 . 17-117-23 22 0032 01680 CONCORDIA ST LAD SEDOX LINDA D SEDOK 1680 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA liN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0040 01635 CONCORDIA ST HOWARD R ALTON III HOWARD R ALTON III 1635 CONCORDIA ST ORONO HN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0043 01675 CONCORDIA ST HELEN K TRAXNOR HELEN K TRAXNOR 1675 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA HN 65391 i PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 507 00009 t . • ) X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RFPRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATXON AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COtWY OEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION/ TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE 4ri ML aI ■ i1 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM; Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: SUBJECT: August 10,1999 #2:^’6 Jeff Martineau 1420 Shoreline Drive Variances —Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre) Lot Area:approximately 2.0 acres Summary of Request: In 1997 the residence was removed from the property. All that remains on the lot is a detached garage and driveway. The applicant has applied to the City for variances to allow the lot to be redeveloped as a residential site and to permit the detached garage on the property to remain. The Code would not allow an accessory building to remain after the principal building has been removed without the Council granting a variance. Applicant also requests variances from bluff setback to permit a new residence to be constructed within the 30' bluff setback. Lot History; The lot was 2.9 acres in size prior to 1983 when .9 acres was divided off and joined with an adjacent property leaving the existing 2.0 acre parcel. Previous property owners have inquired about extension of sewer to the property. This is one of the few lakeshore lots in the City that is not within the MUSA area to allow for the provision of sanitary sewer. There is interest in coimecting this property to sewer. Sewer connection would require the property demonstrate it is not suitable for a primary and alternate septic site, or apply for a MUSA expansion which would require approval of the City and Metropolitan Council. §2516 Jejf Martineau 1420 Shoreline Driye Variances B/16^9 Page \ ? . J Lakeshore Setback Tanager Lake is located on the west side of the property and Brown ’s Bay of Lake Minnetonka is on the east side of the property across Shoreline Drive, The lot has two 0-75' lakeshore setback zones. There is a small portion of the driveway within the setback along the east side of the property. Obviously this amount of hardcover (120 s.f.) is required for driveway access to the property from Shoreline Drive. A garage and small portion of driveway is located within the 75' lakeshore setback on the northwest comer of the property. This building was required to be removed when the principal residence was removed from the property. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 prohibits accessory buildings on lots absent a principal stmcture. It could be assumed the garage would not require a hardcover variance at this time bemuse it is a legally existing non-conforming building, however it may be appropriate to grant the variance for hardcover if the Planning Commission and Council determines the building can remain on the lot. Bluff Setback A bluff rises from the Tanager Lake shoreline to approximately to the 960' contour. The Shoreland Ordinance requires a minimum setback of 30' to the top of bluff for a structure. Refer to the attached survey/site plan (Exhibit D) the plan indicates a limited building pad on the property outside of required setbacks and allowing for a 30' top of bluff setback. Surveyor has depicted on the survey a proposed house layout over the high point on the property that could not meet the bluff setback. The residence however would be within the actual building pad on the property as defmed by the typical yard setbacks (absent the bluff setback). A variance may be appropriate in this case to allow building within 30' of the top of bluff setback due to the limited building pad on the 2.0 acre property. The proposed location of the residence would take advantage of the previous building pad and not require the removal of trees necessary for protection of the property between the prop'tsed house and Shoreline Drive. Building in the proposed location would also allow a future property owner to take advantage of building over the hipest portion of the property. If a house were built further to the north on the lot the existing drive would be required to be realigned and result in removal of mature trees and some extensive regrading. Septic It is unknown if the property could sustain two confonning septic sites. The steep grades and lakeshore setbacks may require the property owners to request sewer extension from the City Council. The property is outside of the MUSA area, but to its benefit it is adjacent to other sewered properties and is a lakeshore lot. §2^16 Jeff Martineau 1420 Shoreline Drive Variances 8/16/99 Page! . I Hardcover Mark Gronberg has completed proposed hardcover calculations and has demonstrated the property could sustain and house and garage combination close to 5,000 s.f. without requesting any variances. The existing drive would meet City requirements and require only a small amount of grading on the property. Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0’-75' Tanager Lake 1,236 s.f.1,236 s.f. (4.0%) none (0%) 1,236 s.f. (4.0%) All hardcover in this setback is existing and is not scheduled for removal 0'-75’ Brown's Bay 4,800 s.f.120 s.f. (2.5%) none (0%) 120 s.f. (2.5%) Hardcover is required for existing driveway 75’-250’ Proposed 48,400 s.f.approx. 12% 12,100 s.f. (25%) 11,205 s.f. (23.15%) No variance would be requested for hardcover within the 75’-250’ lakeshore setback Issues for Discussion 1.The property has a limited building pad for a two acre lot due to the increased impact of the top of bluff setbac:.. The applicant has requested a variance to allow an encroachment into the 30' setback. 2.A garage structure is located within the 0-75’ lakeshore setback. The building by Code should have been removed at the time the property owner voluntarily removed the residence in 1997. The applicant intends to maintain the building at its present site. 3. 4. The lot is subject to two 75’ lakeshore setback zones. The variance from bluff setback would allow the property to be developed over the area already graded by the existing house. The area is clear of trees and driveway alignment is established. iH5!6 Jtff Mar tine au 1420 Shoreline Dr he Variances S/16/9^2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. 2. Staff recommends approval of the variances to permit encroachment into the top of bluff setback to permit a new residence to be constructed on the site over the previous building site based on the following hardships: The proposed location of the residence would take advantage of the previous building pad and not require the removal of trees necessary for protection of the property between the proposed house and Shoreline Drive. Building in the proposed location would also allow a future property owner to take advantage of building over the highest portion of the property. If a house were built further to the north on the lot the existing drive would be required to be realigned and result in removal of mature trees and some extensive regrading. Attachments A B C D E F G H I Application Applicant's Statement of Hardship Survey Location Map Topographic Map Hardcover Worksheets Plat Map Property Owners List Permit Record §2516 JeffMartineau 1420 ShortUm Drive Variances 8/16/99 Page 4 \ \ JCE APPUCATION • • Application # ^ ^ Date Receiv^"^ *7/2.iM^ Amount Paid t cmr OF ORONO - Vi Initial Application Fee____ ($50.00 per each additional variance) • Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from ori^nal application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 Afler-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address /t/20 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) aA Mk A A . #Attach legal description to^plicati^^ Date Property Acquired V; ” not included on required survey. Xmonth/year) I (do not) also own the aHjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: 2X readential o ther (specify), .^ning District: ^ A-1A J________________ APPLICANT Name ' Address: €.L4K( J7 Phonefhome l 62? ___ Phonefwork i Hi 1-^3^ . City: /J/J>Y7AT4 Zip: SS3J/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone fhome ^^>^7f3S_ M f____» N JrM f/^A Address: ^2^tW ____ Phone (work) City:Zip:_j DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $, Describe request in detail: )/AiiUiK/cc Bu4Pf- ^(rTGACk •TO —AA§A ///.Bi/iy n-KAi,c, Ah (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area . _ Setback: Lot Width Front ■■ " Side Hardcoyer % • • Rear *Average Lakeshore Other (specify) B L Ciff 7* HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITiONS ,, Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventmg compliance with Zoning Code requirements: /i/^ Ol/Ak^ Td AC6u,l/) Ci^C4,r/^Ay c^///Lf CPir 7S' r^SACK, ffrMCk /J' yfCA^i<?K (attach additional sheets if necessary) ■ I r"ITT^UfcAJ ^3-tAA ■ ^ KUN OATf t7/19/9f HEtMEPIN COUNTY PROPEHTY IHFORHATIOM SYSTEH PROTCRTY.OHHERS LIST •ATCH SU PROP AODR ONNCR NAME TAXPAYCR NANE/AOOR SO 02*117-23 3S 0010 01410 SHORELINE DR A HARRISON OIL HARRISON ALFRED 0 INQRID L HARRISON 1410 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA HN 55391 SO 02-117-2S 33 0012 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED THE CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX M CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SO 11-117-23 22 0004 01440 SHORELINE DR JANES P RIVERS ETAL JANES P RIVERS 1444 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA HN 55391 SO 11-117-23 22 0005 01442 SHORELINE DR JANES P RIVERS ETAL JANES P RIVERS 1444 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA NN 55391 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SO 11-117-23 22 0007 OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J P 0 N A RIVERS JANES P t NARY A RIVERS 1444 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA HN 55391 30 11-117-23 22 0010 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED J P I H A RIVERS JANES P 0 NARY A RIVERS 1444 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA NN 55391 PROP AODR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 30 11-117-23 22 0014 01432 SHORELINE OR L E 0 J L BORN TRUSTEES LAUREN E 0 JOYCE L BORN 1432 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA NN 55391 30 11-117-23 22 0015 01420 SHORELINE DR S B 0 A B SILL STEVEN B 0 ANANOA B SILL 1420 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA HN 55391 REPORT NO. PI43S401 PAGE 43 • • 30 11-117-23 21 0001 00030 ADDRESS PENDING GENHAR INDUSTRIES INC KINGS COVE BOAT SALES INC ATTN STEVE BATES 9 STATE HNY NO 61 HASTINGS NN 55033 30 11-117-23 22 0006 ' 01444 SHORELINE DR J P t N A RIVERS JANES 7 0 NARY A RIVERS 1444 SHORELINE DR NAYZATA NN 55391 ♦ .* 30 11-117-23 22 0013 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED THE CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY NN 55323 . F TOTAL BATCH 511 OOOII *.. 1 CERTIFY THAT TM! FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE _ REPRESENTATION OF IHFORNATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPAR7HENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE w' (isj O f- 1 ^ OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR . JEI^F MARTINEAU LOT 2, BLOCK 1. DRAGONFLY HILL HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA S 90*00'00" E 151.92 >. V' \ \ \\ \ \ V '• WU' normai. ------- \ \ \ > UK« i\' V\\ \ \' 14'A'''.Ill'to, ‘'®‘S'm I ii » 1 1 \ N.. h 'f' x:7^ \v\\\vA\\\ ‘ I / I;®' M^^ve’x;, rCw LINE\Vv:^ %x \\\\ \ \ !• tt .. JJL l '! I :ation \ tv ' |! ^ - f 1# LCCAl OCSCRPTION OT PRCMTSCS : TKol port of Lot 2 lyin^ Northwesterly of the Southeosterly 37.03 feet thereof. Block t, Drogonfly HiS. a* • I Mkifff MNT#oe MMf, MfA#* 0Ar.*A4 o : denotes iron morker Bearings shown ore bosed upon on ossumed dotum. This survey Intends to show the bour>dot<es of the above described property, ond the locotlon of on eslsting goroge thereon. It does not purport to show ony other Improvements or encroocfvnents. \ \ A'W'x ''f\' ___ ------U“ ; tV v\.§ ^ as' ----------- / * -1 / \ P \ u» m OO ' ^ ,.S ^ <' S r ‘ > ' - lamimr i»« c# 'lof t aocK I, 0fUOC»#|.y NLi K • • A'/JRT//i/eAc( CS/ll ) hardcovercalculation worksheet 75-250*SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) EXISTING HARD COVER IN ZONE ^'aFt (CAH^ MTHA) A. House ________u:___ '■ ^ 250-500* Length X X X B. Garage *C.‘. Drivway D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ R JgjlQPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE ‘ A House Length X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZO^^. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - B Width X 100 Width X 100 13 7-z/’99 500-1000' S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. /2 O S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. /to SJ. VPOO SJ. 2.so % SE SJ. SJ. '■SJ. SJ. SJ. S.F. S.F. SJ. SJ. S.F. S.F. SJ. s.f; SJ. SJ. SJ. V. A B . f A B m-A (S/it) HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) CU^Sf 75-250’ 250-500’ •EXISTING HARD COVER TN ZONT f/iuACiK (/H^f A House X = Ungth Widih B. Garage __ C. Driveway __ r. 2. X X X V. i S3 S3. D. Sidewalk E Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric ' -O. Other X \ X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ■ TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZOhnZ A _____________ - n PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House ______________ X Length B. Oarage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk B. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain ”6y Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X X X X X X O. O’Jier TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ * B X 100 Wit'ih 500-1000’ .. __________S.F. __________S.F. __________S,F. P Z. S.F. S.F. 60 0 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SE. S.F. SJf.‘ / 2.36 SI. A 30.J?00 SJ. B V.O/ Vo .S.F. ST. ST. ■■ST. xlOO S.F. S.F. S.F. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. A ST. B % .-.1 ' *. . (fnc) HARDCOVER CALCULATIOr^ORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ 250-500’ EXISTING HARDCOVER TN ZONE A House _______._____ X _____________ ® 500-1000’ S.F. Length B. Garage C. ’ Driveway mm ^ • • • D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X •>. X X X X X X X X O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ________ B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE' A House ^2.X X X B. Oarage C. Driveway 3z D. Sidewalk L Pati^Ce^ F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric / y Zo X X X X X X X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A __________ - B Width X 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. SJ. • «4 S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. SJ. % V6 ZPS2. VT SJ. '■SJ. 2V 7^<P S J. S.F. SJ. A B /2 0 0 /y /es SJ. Z s J. ^I1 SJ. SJ. SJ. S.F. «3.; //, Z^SsJF. */S. HOP SJ. X 100 ■* 13. iS PERMIT RECORD n- </-^-7 Permit No. ■ /OfcV Date Type of Permit /}0/J/r/AAJ •if'feS!' {J ^ /O/ c 6«")P M*^' s:3 <?=:fiTir f>JJ9 1-^-9,'. —--------- --------__. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-3-9^ 3lo(^ 39^tf —-------------------------------------— VI—//'A 0 mJj/fAV J9 A.n <3 9'7'9^ ------------------------------ 33^^ I r ^-7 T • • •• TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Plani Jig Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: RE: Kris Jenson, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner August 9,1999 #2517 Scott and Lisa Bittman, 25 Brown Road South Variance —Public Hearing Zoning:RR-IB, 2 Acre District Application: To allow a front yard setback variance in order to construct a second story on the existing residence. STAFF SUMMARY The applicants have requested a front yard variance to add a second story to the existing home, which was constructed 42.7* from the Brown Road South Right-of-Way. The lot is 3 acres, on which sits a house and 2 garages. The other structures exceed setback requirements, and the house exceeds the side and rear yard requirements. Staff observed during a site visit that the land between the ROW and the residence is heavily wooded, and the house is not seen from the road. Furthermore, if the house were to be tom down and built at the setback line, it would require the removal of many large mature trees on the lot This addition was started without a building permit, but by the time Staff discovered the work, the roof had been removed. Staff gave them the OK to go ahead with the project, with the understanding that the variance would be applied for to make die addition legal. The applicant's were also advised that they were proceeding at their own risk, meaning that if the Planning Commission and the City Council denied the variance, the addition would need to be removed. The planned height of the new addition is 25*. Pertinent Ordinance Section 10.28 RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District, Subd. 5, Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements (B) Lots. The minimum front yard shall be 50*. ANALYSIS RR-IB District Requirements Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard 2 acres 200*50 ’50 ’30 ’ 92517 Scott ift Liia Bittman, 25 Brown Road South Front Yard Variance August 9,1999 page-1 » i 1 Lot Area lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard 3 Acres 396.17 ’42.7 to ROW 180 ’+ to house 96’, 200.2’ This lot conforms to required lot width, lot area, side and rear yard requirementr. Issues 1 . This is an after-the-fact variance request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variance to allow a second story to be constructed on the existing home with a setback of 42.7' feet, a variance of 7.3 ’ feet from the 50 ’ setback. Exhibits: --------,r.- A B C D E F Application Location Map Plat Map Survey Elevation Drawings Neighboring Property Owners List §2517 Scott A Lisa Blttman, 25 Brown Road South Front Yard VarUmct August 9,1999 pagt-2 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPUCATION Initid Application Fee $250.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) . Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Application# ■T.Si'l Date Received" 7/^//^ 7 Amount Paid ? 50 PROPERTY INFORM^ON ^ ^ She Address i/l -----Site Afloress 1^' ------—r„i ----------------—r----- . Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)—^^ ^--------^-4t «__f j___if r included on reouired survey.Attach legal descriptio.i to applicato ^ “St included on required survey. Date Prop«t^cquired____lSsjiJS3---;———--------------------- I (do) M^n^also own^ adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) other (specify). wn t^ Present uSS^property. J^readential Zoning District:______^ _j Phone fhome’l ^ I xt ™ ________ Phone(work)_____________ Address: ^ -----Zipg^x^!^^ APPUC 5 Distnct:_________ O'WNER Of different than applicant) Name____________________ Phone (home). Phone (work). Address:City:.Zip:. jCRIPTION of request f Estimated ^nstiuctiomCoskS__^Q.——rasSES- lestjjje r^est in detail: pP p!^ ^ -------ri^.C/^iAO —OlIZ - -----------(attach additional sheets if necessary) ^ ^ Lot Coveragiisx iVARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _ /V Setback: ___Lot Width Front __Side Hardcover Rear Average Lakeshon^^x* Other (specify) compliance with Zoning Code requirenients.— >4^0 ci-0<^o TO rgg<d ------------------ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the applicatipn deadline datejn order for vour application to be considered coniplctgi • T. 2. 3. X 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form ' , . Certified Property Owners List of owners within^lSO','labels and plat map (you must obtain this Ust, labels and map from Hennepin ^unty Departm^ of Finance, A-603, Govt Center. 348-3271). ^C^JlAOSx ^70 ^ Certificate of.Survey (signed by a licensed^urveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy SVi" x 11” for reproduction. , , . v Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S’/i" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8!4" x 11"). List of the legal'nSnes Cmclude marital staPis) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would mclude name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this appUcation, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. j»* I The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that JJUIE variance aDDliriition is not complete if the above informatiftn has nQt 'L \ ATPUCANTS SIGNATDEE . . .v - 3-^ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning ^ Admimstrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by ori^ fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is truk and cc^rrect^ tl^ best pf his/her knowledge. Ij sr< r. ;•> Applicant's Signature I OWNER’S SIGNATURE ^ ^ ^ ^ " The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this appbcation and further authorizes reasonable , entry onto the propei^ by City stafi; consult^ts. agents, Commission members, and CouncU^nj members for purpose^ of investigation and ve^cation of this request. ^ if Owner's Signatun >1 AppUcant must submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Pl^g Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of eacn month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planmng Commission and CouncU. If an appUcant is unable to attend a scheduled meetmg, p ewe make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise e & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting.U rThiei\L OCCIHIUIO * V/t. • MEDINA 2600 I ©.8 • IM AVt M* aoo UUIT QorrM I a ui3 MfUtA lira TnZ^ mtiaw) i VtAACa U*NA> ii«M , I jS 9dSSi ••••............. MM a u III C0^ 66 0 tmmiBw J !iI ocywu ttiimca SEE MAP 48 •lU RU./ •« fill'"' W\J?!L-•N-' mmi 400 .............. MMMM VAT ORON J.I Vi***\] 1^*.... '**■•••* ■••'f OTodo I2S? a 4tZ5ll- .V -------■^’Vl/ CUMAUM 8 IliAOOVI \ Tout A AQAT«5s MU TA '."i ^ At ■ v*y —rr-y J , »».. fV. . •• -!.f \ i* •* • *' ‘>^/T3u« {I »• »5vrX.. ■ 4^ a *800;" * '. V'^NyNoefcjibcrg Afflinve// \ Bay :\ ij ‘ \y ' , '. ■ /*. , ■ • .0 mitTNMSU 1»» CAIlIAl- S / ■.v-.i'O —rT . • *.. • I VIAAI I 1a (T'5i> J 'uiuAr TIIAVIM •00 > \ I _l:^H lUI^L ST? rS LUi ItflA Xuoo m« L V'"^3!■ iinrSfi _J3«" i? s J I ./- \r • &1 KwyfiJBratvns • j*‘vS'Bflv '** 4 ... ■*i* ' ^ SEE MAP 76* ftQ9tJ -rl -'r.';‘?V.-'^ »4 »*'. r • ' .. UokomtY / I-.- V. ^ €P» t I t* i ; f i I . •» - -ST 0 4 •i •' * ' •* • *^ ' * fCiPW _____ 1 \tk JW ^ ''i:?* ■• r:’b^^rno2*45 w. (34)5 V • • /m ® /a ' 313.5 123. 69 90 5? 'v iW (21)2 >6 1^46.41 >mS\ 55 ' 2.69 Q *”® cn(20)S5 44 K - 21 - : (33) S 22.04 e (19) «o 20 w (32) 5 <o // g:. 40 a WESTWOOD (10) v\ -K kennedy LA)^’^ fi!/^ C(39) 6) B /C- '\ 75 • 15 •(27) 1 03j in 1 y ! r 28 Z 17 in X- ! 85 ^ 183!r^3)’ 30) 89*32'52*W 174'313. 5 (12) I SAli!J®0i\ 189*32'52*1* 383.68 s 90.02 (9) 317 D z ■•» X S P ^ 8 .. 191.68 50.09 (14) CLIN DR) »59.0I N89*45'IB*W ft. 232.04 ro OUTLOT A .® ; CUT lOT B 337.05 4 M9*44'42*W K (16) (7) 4 ^ JL 40.02 V'v I 7-)n 33 :l- EAST 241.77 ^.qA* r. 192. 25 4^^ 102. 25 Jip EAST (10) <S5) I« ^ /A EAST § 11 (11) / c •• I I ■{ RUN DATE 07/16/99 BATCH 505 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SO 03-117-23 12 0004 0003S ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOHN F DUNN ETAL JOHN F DUNN 20 S BROWN RD P 0 BOX 77 LONG LAKE HN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NANS TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB 03-117-23 12 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOHN F DUNN ETAL JOHN F DUNN 20 S BROWN RD ' PO BOX 77 LONG LAKE HN .55356 • / PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB OS-117-23 21 0014 02010 COLIN DR ; ^ NIVIN S NACNILLAN • \ NIVXN SNYDER NACNILLAN 151 WESTWOOD LA WAYZATA NN 55391 ' PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR SB S4-11B-2S 34 0010 00015 DROWN RD S J N I D J EIS^ JOHN N 0 BONNIE J EISS 15 DROWN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55356 ’ ■ ■■ *. •. ' PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 72 34-118-23 43 0076 •' •^ 01995 KENNEDY LA . D E 8 J A STEBBZNS ' DAVID 0 JUDITH STEBBINS 1995 KENNEDY LA LONG LAKE KN 55356 0 • t HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORNATION SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 3B 03-117-23 12 0006 0003B ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOHN F DUNN ETAL JOHN F DUNN 20 S DROWN RD P 0 BOX 77 LONG LAKE HN 55356 3B. 03-117-23 12 0010 00130 DROWN RD S . WALTER RICHARD NCCARTHY JR WALTER RICHARD NCCARTHY JR C/O FCX 332 NINNESOTA ST R2100 ST PAUL NN 55101 3B 03-117-23 21 OOIB 0003B ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LLOYD S KELLEY LESTER S KELLEY 2135 COLIN DR LONG LAKE NN 55356 72 S4-11B-23 34 0030 00032 WESTWOOD DR ROBERT D HANCE ROBERT D HANCE 32 WESTWOOD DR LONG LAKE NN 55356 00B2 S 72 34-11B-23 43 OOOIB DROWN RD JUDY L KELLETT JUDY L KELLETT IB BROWN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55356 y . *• . 'J ."i ■ REPORT NO. PI435401 ' PAGE 30 38 03-117-23 12 0007■ 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED JOHN F DUNN ETAL JOHN F DUNN 20 S BROWN RD P 0 BOX 77 LONG LAKE (01 55356 ' 38 03-117-23 21 0001 00025 BROWN .RD S S BITTHAN I L BITTNAN SCOTT 8 LISA BITTHAN 25 BROWN RD S • LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 03-117-23 21 0024 02075 WATERTOWN RD A 8 L PETERSON ALAN B 8 LORRIE J PETERSON 2075 WATERTOWN RD LONO LAKE HN 55356 72 34-118-23 34 0031 00038- WESTWOOD DR T J 8 S E BOSWELL-HEALEY T J 8 S E BOSWELL-HEALEY 38 WESTWOOD DR LONO LAKE Ml 55356 I I TOTAL BATCH 505 00014 - * • I .*• . t• I * . • . . 4 I• • • • . f • ; 4- • • • * r- • • /. •O • J J a 'll 6" i : •4- I • • • ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the foilowing members present: Chair Elizabeth Hawn, Commissioners William Stoddard, Dale Lindquist, Janice Berg, and Daniel Kluth. Commissioner Jay Nygard arrived at 6:36 p.m. The following represented the City Staff: Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator Kris Jenson, Public Works Director Greg Gappa, and Recorder Jackie Young. City Council Member Barbara Peterson was present. Mayor Gabriel Jabbour was present, and Parks Commission Representative Sherokee Use was present. Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. OLD BUSINESS (#1) #2410 PETER BOYNTON. 1973 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Peter Boynton, Applicant, was present along with Joe Dzurik, Contractor. Weinberger stated the Applicant has appeared before the Planning Commission previously with a proposal requesting variances to height, structural coverage, and a conditional use permit for land alteration to allow for a walkout. The Applicant is proposing to remove the existing structure and build a new residence. The Applicant has submitted a revised plan placing the residence 47.59 feet from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. The proposed plan requires multiple variances for lot area, hardcover in the 0-250' setbacks, lakeshore setback, rear yard setback, and a conditional use permit for land alteration in the lakeshore setback to allow for a walkout. The Applicant is proposing to excavate and remove approximately 124 cubic yards of soil. Weinberger stated this property is unique in that it is located with lakeshore on both sides of the property. However, the lot contains only one 0-75' lakeshore setback. Variances are required for lot area and lot width due to the lot not meeting the standard requirements for lot area or lot width. The proposed garage is located 21 feet from the right-of-way where 30 feet is required. The Applicant has redesigned the plan to a 30 foot structure, which brings the height of the structure into compliance. Weinberger stated that the Applicant is proposing to reduce the amount of hardcover in the 0-75' setback to 11 percent where 22 percent currently exists as well as in the 75-250' setback, reducing the hardcover in that area to 30 percent. City Staff recommends denial of the conditional use permit for land alteration within 75 feet of the lakeshore due to the signiricant anr.ount of nil proposed to be removed. Staff is recommending approval of the variances to hardcover. Page 1 I ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (#2410 Peter Boynton, Continued) Boynton stated that he is attempting to compiy with the Planning Commission's directions with this revised plan, noting that he has reduced the size of the house, lowered the height of the proposed residence, and relocated the structure in an attempt to bring it more into compliance. Boynton expressed frustration at the length of time that the application has taken, and inquired whether there were any additional steps that needed to be taken in order for this application to be approved. Dzurik commented that to his understanding the conditional use permit for grading within 75 feet of the lakeshore appears to be a problem but that everything else appears to be in compliance. Dzurik stated if the conditional use permit is a problem, they would be willing to revise the pian to allow for a smaller walkout as currently exists in an effort to minimize the amount of excavation needed. Hawn stated in general she agrees with Dzurik's statement, but that normally the Planning Commission does not permit grading within 75 feet of the lakeshore. Smith noted that under City Staffs recommendations they do not find a hardship to allow for 30 percent hardcover in the 75-250' setback in addition to the hardcover being requested within 75 feet of the lake. Smith commented that she generally is in favor of the application. Lindquist stated that due to the lakeshore that exists on both sides, some variances are needed. Lindquist commented that overall structural coverage is within the required 15 percent, and that he is not aware of how the hardcover could be further reduced. Stoddard inquired whether the hardcover would fall under 25 percent if there was only one lakeshore setback. Weinberger stated that it would not be under 30 percent. Smith inquired what the 11 percent hardcover in the 0-75' setback consists of. Weinberger stated that was the portion of the house encroaching into the 75' setback. Boynton commented that he relocated the residence to keep it in line with the neighbors. Stoddard stated that it is unfortunate the Applicant had to appear before the Planning Commission so many times in order to get this application approved, but that certain conditions must be met before approval can be given. There were no public comments. Smith noted that the proposed hardcover is less than what is currently existing. Weinberger stated that typically with a rebuild, it is treated as new construction. Boynton asked for clarification of a rebuild. Weinberger stated when an old structure is removed, the lot is treated as new construction and is generally held to City standards unless some type of hardship is demonstrated. Boynton commented that he has attempted to comply with the Planning Commission's directions Page 2 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (^2410 Peter Boynton, Continued) as best as possible, and in his opinion this plan is acceptable. Lindquist moved, Nygard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2410, 1973 Fagerness Point Road, permitting a variance to hardcover in the 0-75' setback and in the 75>250* setback as proposed, a variance to the 30 foot setback from the street to allow the garage, variances to lot area and lot width, and denial of the conditional use permit for land alteration in the lakeshore setback, with the understanding that the grade will remain as presently exists. The Planning Commission finds that a hardship does exist for lot area, lot width and the 75 foot lakeshore setback due to the two lakeshore setbacks and the minimal amount of land available for a residence to be constructed on. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#2) #2501 CITY OF ORONO, 3601 BAYSIDE ROAD - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Weinberger slated that the City of Orono is requesting a conditional use permit and variance to relocate an existing dock at the north end of Stubbs Bay. Weinberger commented that this application was reviewed at the June Planning Commission meeting. The City of Orono has maintained a municipal dock and walking path for many years on the north end of Stubbs Bay. A reccr.t sua-ey by an adjacent property owner revealed that the dock and path were not located on City owned property. The dock has since been relocated on City property. Relocating the dock and walking path within the undeveloped Oak Street will require filling a small amount of wetland for the path. A small amount of fill is necessary to provide better access and handicapped access to the dock, which has existed for a numt^r of years. This area also exists as a snowmobile access to Lake Minnetonka. Smith commented that snowmobiles are not allowed east of Stubbs Bay. Weinberger staled the City is proposing to place 180 square feet of fill in the wetland to create a base to accommodate a walking path to access the dock. The Wetland Conservation Act allows filling of wetlands up to 400 cubic feet i* certain measures of avoidance and minimization are demonstrated. A permit is required from the MCWD to fill. Weinberger noted that the City has received a number of phone calls requesting that the dock remain as well as requests that some additional improvements to this area be made. The Parks Commission has reviewed this application and has concluded that this area will not be developed as parkland. The small size of the property limits any recreational use or placement of picnic tables on the site. This dock is intended for pedestrian use only and not for boat storage, with no parking being allowed along Bayside Road. City Staff is recommending approval of this application. Gappa staled that the dock v;as relocated a few years ago, with direction being given by the City Council that this access be upgraded. Gappa commented that the fill is needed due to the uneven topography of the land. Gappa stated that this request is reasonable and necessary in order to improve the dock and walkway. Renae Mueller, 222 Bederwood Drive, stated she is in favor of the dock and that the existing dock Page 3 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (#2501 City of Orono, Continued) should be maintained and improved, noting that the present dock is not very stable. Mueller commented that she had questioned whether a bench could be located near the dock, and inquired whether that would be permitted. Mueller stated as far as drainage is concerned, there is a catch basin and culvert in the area, which should be able to handle the runoff from the street. Jeff Mueller, 222 Bederwood Drive, commented he would like to see the dock improved, noting that he is not in favor of wetlands being filled, but that this dock should be accessible. Sherokee Use, Parks Commission, stated this application has appeared before the Parks Commission twice, with the general consensus of the commission that the filling of the wetland should be avoided if at all possible. Use commented that the Parks Commission would like to see the dock extended. Use also inquired if the fill was to be located in the area where the cattails have been cut down. Gappa stated he was unfamiliar with what area had been cut down. Use stated that she personally is concerned that the City of Orono is setting a bad precedent by allowing the wetland to be filled, and urged the Planning Commission to consider other options. Use stated that the catch basin in this area appears to be clogged, and that in her opinion any fill placed in the wetland will wash away due to the runoff from the street. Use stressed the importance of the wetlands and how they should be preserved. Hawn inquired whether extension of the dock has been considered by City Staff. Gappa stated that extension of the dock would be difficult due to the uneven topography in the area Gappa stated it is the City's intention to direct the water runoff around the walkway and to have the area reseeded. Stoddard inquired whether filling of the wetlands would impact the number of snowmobilers who currently access the lake from this area. Stoddard noted that handicap accessibility is one reason for the fill. Gappa stated it is his understanding that snowmobiles are not allowed east of Stubbs Bay and that this is a connection to the Luce Line, v^ich has existed for many years. Jeff Mueller commented that the Snowmobile Association paid a significant amount of money for that access and that this fill should not increase the number of snowmobilers who utilize this access. Gappa stated that the City will make this dock handicap accessible, noting that it is not the City's intention to allow boat launching in this area. Smith inquired how the City's survey could be inaccurate. Gappa stated that there was a change in ownership of t < adjoining property, with the previous owner never raising an issue with the location of the dock. Gappa noted that the City has verified the property lines. Kluth commented that the City may legally be entitled to keep the dock in its old location due to the fact that it existed in that location for a number of years. Page 4 1 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (#2501 City of Orono, Continued) Gappa stated that was considered and It was determined that it was easier to move the dock than to contest it legally. Hawn commented that in her view she does not see a compelling reason why the fill should be approved. Hawn noted that a letter from Madeline Pigeon was received indicating that she is not in support of this project, oiling increased snowmobile traffic and runoff into the lake. Use remarked that she has not heard any negative comments regarding the snowmobilers, but suggested that a snow fence be erected in this area. Smith commented that the amount of fill being requested should not be minimized, and inquired how the amount of fill for this project compares with other applications requesting fill to be placed in wetlands. Gappa stated that the amount of fill proposed is approximately a truck and a half of dirt, noting that the Wetland Conservation Act allows filling of wetlands up to 400 cubic feet and the amount of fill being proposed is minimal. Smith questioned whether the Planning Commission would approve other applications where a request is being made to fill wetlands. Gappa stated that filling of wetlands is mitigated through the Watershed District. Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2501, City of Orono, 3601 Bayside Road, to grant a conditional use permit permitting 21.11 cubic yards of fill, and to grant a variance to hardcover within the 75* setback to permit 180 square feet of hardcover, subject to the condition that the Public Works Director personally oversee all work on this project to insure that the cattails and slopes are reseeded and that proper drainage is achieved into the wetland from the road, and that the Parks Commission review this application prior to any work being commenced. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 1, Hawn Opposed. Hawn indicated she was opposed to this motion because in her view it sets a dangerous precedent. Hawn commented that she would like to see the Public Works Department pursue installation of a snow fence in this area. Nygard commented that he would like to see improvements to the dock pursued as well. SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING (#3) #2479 PETER ANDREA COMPANY, 555 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH - CLASS III SUBDIVISION, 7:15 p.m. • 8:05 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Mark Gronberg, Surveyor, and Jim Deanovic, Peter Andrea Co., were present. Weinberger stated the .’ pplicant is proposing a seven lot subdivision for property located at 555 Stubbs Bay Road North. The developer has addressed most of the issues previously discussed Page 5 . m ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (#2479 Peter Andrea Company, Continued) by the Planning Commission. Preliminary septic reports have been reviewed and conditionally approved by Steve Weckman. The proposed subdivision creates a rural residential development with five plus acre lots served by private septic systems and individual wells. The proposed subdivision is in keeping with the general character of the neighborhood. Due to the topography of the site and wetlands, many of the lots are irregular in size and shape, but each lot appears to demonstrate a suitable building site within the required setbacks and allow for a primary and secondary septic site. Weinberger stated that Outlet A is intended to be a private road held by the Homeowners Association and will be responsible for the maintenance of the private road. The outlet is platted at 1,100 feet In length, with City Code allowing a maximum of 1,000 feet for cul-de-sacs. The road is being platted with the intent to extend the road when access is required to the west. Future extension of the cul-de-sac is shown as Outlot B. Weinberger stated that this development lies within two major drainage districts. The City Engineer is recommending that the final plans include water quality provisions for storm water leaving the northerly and southerly portions of the site, subject to the condition that the City Engineer reviews and approves the drainage plan and stormwater treatment pond within the development. Weinberger noted that the City of Orono has not adopted a stormwater management plan at this time, but at this time are requesting that money be escrowed in order to cover the expenses of future ponding. Weinberger commented that an adjacent property owner has expressed concerns about the impact of the private road in relation to her property to the east as it relates to traffic and headlights from vehicles entering Stubbs Bay Road. Weinberger stated that City Staff has looked at other possible locations for the driveway but feels that the proposed location of the road is the only suitable location due to the location of the stormwater management pond as well as the negative impact other road locations would have on the building sites for Lots 3 and 4. City Staff Is recommending approval of this application subject to the conditions outlined in the Planner's Report. Gronberg stated that the proposed drainage plan \MII capture approximately 85 percent of the runoff from the road and divert it into the pond. Gronberg commented that buffer strips have been discussed as an alternative to ponding. Deanovic stated that this is the first time that he has been informed about an escrow for future ponding, noting that this application was filed approximately six months ago. Hawn remarked that the Planning Commission usually defers to the City Engineer on any issues relating to drainage and grading. Gronberg commented In his view this issue could be worked out. Weinberger stated that it is possible that some buffering could be done in this development. Hawn inquired whether there were any public comments regarding this application Donna Cause, 480 Stubbs Bay Road North, Inquired whether the road could be located in another location. Page 6 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19.1999 (#2479 Peter Andrea Compan/, Continued) Weinberger stated that they have considered other locations but the proposed location works best for the entire development. Cause expressed concerns regarding water runoff, noting that a large amount of wetland exists in this area. Don Cause expressed a concern that the water runoff from the road will go directly into his driveway, noting that he currently is experiencing water runoff from Stubbs Bay Road, and that this issue needs to be addressed further. Gronberg stated that they are proposing to Install a culvert and construct ditches in order to capture the water runoff and div.<;rt it into the holding pond. Hawn stated that the City Engineer will need to review and approve all drainage and grading plans for this subdivision and that the City will need to take appropriate steps to insure that proper drainage is achieved. Hawn inquired what, if anything, could be done to prevent headlights from shining into the Cause's residence. Hawn commented that the trees presently located in that area will help shield It somewhat. Hawn encouraged the developer to discuss this matter with the affected property owner. Gronberg stated they are willing to discuss this issue with the Cause's. Steve Harris, 385 Turham Road, inquired about the road easement in the southwest comer of this development. Weinberger stated that easement was actually a platted road at one time, but the City has never developed it. Weinberger stated that the City requires roads to be platted through if access is needed for future lots and that future access to the west could be created if necessary. Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2479, Peter Andrea Company, 555 Stubbs Bay Road North, subject to the conditions outlined in the July 19,1999 Planner’s Report, with consideration being given to turning the road slightly to the south to alleviate the headlight concern. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS (^‘4} #2502 ORONO SELF SERVE - 2160 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 8:06 p.m. - 8:10 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Bill Wear, Applicant, was present. Jenson stated that the Applicant is requesting an amendment to his conditional use permit to add a canopy and a variance to allow the canopy to be located six feet from the property tine. The Applicant had previously submitted an application two years ago on the same request. The Planning Commission at that time recommended approval of the application. This item, however, did not proceed to the City Council as City Staff did not receive the required information from the Applicant. Page 7 L ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19.1999 (#2502 Orono Self Serve, Continued) City Staff is recommending approval of this application. Smith inquired whether this was the same basic application that was submitted two yeat^ ago. Jenson stated that it was. Wear had no comment. There were no public comments. Smith moved, Stoddard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2502, Orono Self Serve, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard, granting an amendment to his conditional use permit to add a canopy, and a variance to allow the canopy to be located six feet from the property line. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#5) #2503 CITY OF ORONO, VACATION OF ALLEY ON PLAT OF BERGQUIST & WICKLUND’S ADDITION, ADJACENT TO SAGA HILL PRESERVE. 8:11 p.m. > 8:15 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Jenson stated that the City of Orono is requesting vacation of a dedicated alley In the Bergqulst and Wickland's Addition to Bergqulst & Wickland's Park in order to provide better public access to the Saga Hill Preserve and to replace it with a shorter, more direct access. This public hearing is required for the vacation of the current alley and not the dedication of the new alley. Hawn inquired whether there were any public comments regarding this application. Wally Holzer, 1130 North Shore Drive West, inquired whether the easement was being eliminated. Hawn stated that it is. Hawn commented that this application relates to a larger agreement. Weinberger stated that the vacation of the alley will return the land back to the Individual property owners and a new access to the park will be proposed. Lindquist inquired whether Holzer had seen the new proposed access. Holzer stated he has and is not opposed to it. Lindquist noted that the Planning Commission is just voting on the vacation. Berg moved. Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2503, City of Orono, granting of the vacation of the alley In Bergqulst and Wickland's Addition to Bergqulst and Wickland's Park. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#6) #2504 WARREN AND TANA GARRETT. 650 BROWN ROAD NORTH • VARIANCES. 8:16 p.m. to 8:29 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Page 8 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (#2504 Warren and Tana Garrett, Continued) Warren Garrett, Applicant, was present. Jenson stated the Applicant is proposing to add an addition to the northeast corner of the home, a deck addition, which will be located on the southeast corner of the existing deck, and an inground swimming pool. The existing hardcover, including the total surface area of the additions, will not exceed 30 percent. A variance is needed to the average lakeshore setback. Staff feels that the proposed location is the most logical and will not block or interfere with the view of either neighbor towards the lake, with heavy vegetation between the residences. Jenson stated the Applicant is also requesting to install a three rail, split-rail fence, 5 feet in height, along the south property line to the lakeshore. The president of the West Shore Townhome Association has written a letter to the City protesting any fence being erected on the Applicant's property. The Applicants are proposing the fence due to the fact that the neighboring lakeshore owner to the south is a Long Lake City Park, and the Applicants have had people trespass on their property and dock. The Applicants feel that the proposed fence will be high enough to deter trespassers, but will not block the view of the adjoining homes. Garrett commented that the letter was written before his application was written, but that he is willing at this time to not construct the proposed fence. Garrett stated he was considering the fence to help deter people from using his dock. Hawn suggested that perhaps he consider installing a sign indicating that it is private property. Garrett inquired whether a fence located on the dock would be a problem, noting that he has some concerns regarding liability. Garrett indicated that the neighbor who has expressed disapproval of the fence was here at tonight's meeting but has left. Weinberger stated a fence located on the dock would be outside the jurisdiction of the City, and the impact that the fence located along the property line would need to be taken into consideration. Garrett stated he could Install a fence on the dock with a gate which would require any trespassers to enter the water in order to obtain access to the dock. Lindquist indicated he does have a problem with a fence in the 0-75' setback. Gaffron stated the City of Orono has not adopted any codes relating to docks, but that he personalty does not have any objection to a fence surrounding the dock to deter trespassers. Garrett indicated that he is veiling to drop the fence portion of his application tonight. There were no public comments. Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2504,650 Brown Road North, granting of a variance to the average lakeshore setback to allow for a deck additition, addition to the house, and an inground swimming pool, with denial of the variance for any fence. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#7) #2474 C. STEVEN AND SUSAN WILSON, 325 BROWN ROAD SOUTH/2150 ABINGDON WAY - VACATION, 8:28 p.m. - 8:34 p.m. Page 9 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19.1999 (#2474 Steven and Susan Wilson, Continued) The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Steven Wilson, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated that the Planning Commission and City Council has recently approved a subdivision of a lot line rearam^' nent for properties located at 325 South Brown Road and 2150 Abingdon Way. City Code requires that the Applicants dedicate drainage and utility easements along all newly created property lines, which have been granted along the new property line. However, the previous underlying drainage and utility easement along the old property line was not vacated at the time the subdivision was approved, which should be vacated. Staff is recommending approval of this application. Wilson had no comment. Hawn inquired whether the Applicant would be agreeable to affirming the agreement with Abingdon Way. Wilson stated it would not be an affirmation, but merely notifying the owners of each lot in this division that they are liable for each easement. Wilson stated he would approach the homeowners association requesting that the 60 foot pathway be eliminated from their agreement, which requires City agreement. Hawn inquired whether that portion was before the Planning Commission as part of this application and whether any legal notice must be given to the adjoining property owners. Gaffron stated that it was, noting that technically action by the Planning Commission may not be required. Gaffron stated that in his opinion no notice is required. There were no public comments. Smith moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2474, 325 Brown Road South/2150 Abingdon Way, vacating the 10 foot wide drainage and utility easement along the previously existing property line between 325 South Brown Road and 2150 Abingdon Way based, and as a result of the lot line rearrangement, the obligation to maintain Abingdon Way will be maintained solely by Lot 5, west of the east 60 foot line, and not Lot 6. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW (#8) #2505 THE BANCOR GROUP. INC., WILLOW DRIVE/6TH AVENUE NORTH • SKETCH PLAN David Newman, Bancor Group, was present, along with Marty Campion, P.E., of Otto & Associates. Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to develop a 58 acre parcel located at the southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. The Applicants have proposed a concept plan to subdivide the property into 52 lots, with an average density of less than one acre per lot. The property is zoned RR-1B, which requires two acres per unit. The Applicants are requesting that the property be rezoned to R-1A, allowing one acre per unit density, and to develop the Page 10 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (#2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Continued) property as a Planned Residential Development. The purpose of a PRC s to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation of natural open spaces and to counteract the effects of urban congestion. A PRO would allow the property to be developed at one unit per acre, with City sewer and water being available to these proposed units. This property could not sustain a rural style development with individual septic systems due to the high water table and soil types present. Weinberger stated that the property to the south may be developed at a slightly higher density, with a two acre density development east of Willow Drive, a low density residential neighborhood north of County Road 6, and the Orono School Campus to the west. This development would serve as a buffer between the lower density residential development to the north and east versus the other land uses to the south and west. The Applicants are proposing a plan that would result In the nearest home being located approximately 225 feet from County Road 6. Several berms are being proposed throughout the development, and each lot will be regraded to create walkout style homes. Access to this development would be off of Willow Drive, with no access off of County Road 6. City Staff recommends that the proposed intersection between the development and Shadowood Drive be aligned, whether it’s through the extension of the northerly road or the other curb cut being relocated further north, to eliminate traffic turning left. The access points are proposed to be approximately 200 feet apart. Weinberger stated that standard drainage and utility easements would be required, as well as parkland dedication. Weinberger stated the Applicants could have the option of donating 8 percent of the land value or designating a portion of the development for trails. Weinberger stated that the hookup costs for City sewer and water will need to be discussed further. Weinberger noted that the City Council has established less restrictive zoning standards for other PRDS, including French Creek and Sugarwoods. Lindquist commented that he is hesitant to approve rezoning of this area due to the high density housing that is being proposed. Newman stated that the high density is necessary due to the connection costs for City sewer and water, noting that they have reviewed the costs Involved in this project and that In order to offset their expenses, upper market housing will need to be constructed in this area. Lindquist inquired whether they have calculated the average lot size for this development. Newman replied they have not yet maos that calculation. Campion stated that they are contemplating tots that average around a half-acre, with the smallest being one-third acre. Stoddard commented that he would like to see a residential development in this area, but that in his view the City Council may wish to retain the two acre zoning. Stoddard stated he is unaware of the economics involved for this development, but that he personally would like to see larger lots. Newman stated that this is an expensive parcel of property to develop, and that not all the residences will be constructed with walkouts. Page 11 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19.1999 (#2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Continued) Campion stated that the walkouts are necessary due to the high water table and soil conditions in the area. Newman stated that they have obtained two sets of soil borings because of the high water table and soils in the area. Hawn commented that the City is interested in providing more affordable housing and that the proposed high density will present drainage problems. Hawn inquired whether a landscaping plan has been developed in more depth. Newman stated they have not designed anything speciricatly for this development at this time. Newman stated in his opinion this site will never be developed for first time home buyers due to the high costs associated with developing this piece of property and that they are contemplating houses in the $350,000 range. Berg questioned whether the location of the access is an issue. Berg commented that she would also like to see lower densHy in this area, noting that in her view some of the proposed lots will be unbuildable due to the small lot size and large pond located in the area. Weinberger stated that the final location of the road will need to be reviewed once the layout of the units is determined. Newman stated they have not reviewed whether the lots contain suitable building pads at this time, which will need to be addressed. Lindquist remarked that the developer will also need to submit a drainage and grading plan, noting that some wetlands do exist in the area. Stoddard stated in his opinion it is doubtful that any zoning under two acres will be approved. Smith commented that the residents are starting to take the view that the holding ponds are a natural feature to the area and should be turned into private beaches, which should not be encouraged. Smith stated that residents are also hesitant to have trails located close to their homes. Smith stated in her opinion the two acre zoning should be adhered to. Newman stated that he is committed to this project. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#9) REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETINGS ON JUNE 28,1999 AND JULY 12.1999 This item was not discussed. (#10) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION None Page 12 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOk JULY 19.1999 (#11) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR JUNE 21,1999 Smith moved, Lindquist approved, to approve the minutes of the Regular Planning Commission meeting of June 21,1999, as submitted. VOTE; Ayes 6, Nays 0, Kluth Abstained. (#12) SELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ON JULY 26,1999 AND AUGUST 9,1999 July 26 - Hawn August 9 - Smith ADJOURNMENT Berg moved, Hawn seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 9:22 p.m. Elizabeth Hawn, Chair •i Page 13 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19.1999 ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chair Elizabeth Hawn, Commissioners William Stoddard, Dale Lindquist, Janice Berg, Daniel Kluth, and Sandra Smith. Commissioner Jay Nygard arrived at 6:36 p.m. The following represented the City Staff: Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator Kris Jenson, Public Works Director Greg Gappa, and Recorder Jackie Young. City Council Member Barbara Peterson was present. Mayor Gabriel Jabbour was present, and Parks Commission Representative Sherokee Use was present. Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m OLD BUSINESS (#1) #2410 PETER BOYNTON, 1973 EAGERNESS POINT ROAD - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Peter Boynton, Applicant, was present along with Joe Dzurik, Contractor. Weinberger stated the Applicant has appeared before the Planning Commission previously with a proposal requesting variances to height, structural coverage, and a conditional use permit for land alteration to allow for a walkout. The Applicant is proposing to remove the existing structure and build a new residence. The Applicant has submitted a revised plan placing the residence 47.59 feet from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. The proposed plan requires multiple variances for lot area, hardcover in the 0-250 ’ setbacks, lakeshore setback, rear yard setback, and a conditional use permit for land alteration in the lakeshore setback to allow for a walkout. The Applicant is proposing to excavate and remove approximately 124 cubic yards of soil. Weinberger stated this property is unique in that it is locat ‘»<^ with lakeshore on both sides of the property. However, the lot contains only one 0-75' lakeshc- i-etback. Variances are required for lot area and lot width due to the lot not meeting the standard requirements for lot area or lot width. The proposed garage is located 21 feet from the right-of-way w.irrr 30 feet is required. The Applicant has redesigned the plan to a 30 foot structure, which brings the heiqli* of the structure into compliance. Weinberger stated that the Applicant is proposing to reduce the amount of hardcover in the 0-75 ’ setback to 11 percent where 22 percent currently exists as well as in the 75-250 ’ setback, reducing the hardcover in that area to 30 percent. City Staff recommends denial of the conditional use permit for land alteration within 75 feet of the lakeshore due to the significant amount of fill proposed to be removed Staff is recommending approval of the variances to hardcover. Page 1 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (#2410 Peter Boynton, Continued) Boynton stated that he is attempting to comply with the Planning Commission ’s directions with this revised plan, noting that he has reduced the size of the house, lowered the height of the proposed residence, and relocated the structure in an attempt to bring it more into compliance. Boynton expressed frustration at the length of time that the application has taken, and inquired whether there were any additional steps that needed to be taken in order tor this application to be approved. Dzurik commented that to his understanding the conditional use permit for grading within 75 feet of the lakeshore appears to be a problem but that everything else appears to be in compliance. Dzurik stated if the conditional use permit is a problem, they would be willing to revise the plan to allow for a smaller walkout as currently exists in an effort to minimize the amount of excavation needed. Hawn stated in general she agrees with Dzurik's statement, but that normally the Planning Commission does not permit grading within 75 feet of the lakeshore. Smith noted that under City Staffs recommendations they do not find a hardship to allow for 30 percent hardcover in the 75-250' setback in addition to the hardcover being requested within 75 feet of the lake. Smith commented that she generally is in favor of the application. Lindquist stated that due to the lakeshore that exists on both sides, some variances are needed. Lindquist commented that overall structural coverage is within the required 15 percent, and that he is not aware of how the hardcover could be further reduced. Stoddard inquired whether the hardcover would fall under 25 percent if there was only one lakeshore setback. Weinberger stated that it would not be under 30 percent Smith inquired what the 11 percent hardcover in the 0-75* setback consists of. Weinberger stated that was the portion of the house encroaching into the 75' setback. Boynton commented that he relocated the residence to keep it in line with the neighbors Stoddard stated that it is unfortunate the Applicant had to appear before the Planning Commission so many times in order to get this application approved, but that certain conditions must be met before approval can be given. There were no public comments Smith noted that the proposed hardcover is less than what is currently existing Weinberger stated that typically with a rebuild, it is treated as new construction Boynton asked for clarification of a rebuild. Weinberger stated when an old structure is removed, the lot is treated as new construction and is generally held to City standards unless some type of hardship is demonstrated Boynton commented that he has attempted to comply with the Planning Commission ’s directions Page 2 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19.1999 <#2410 Peter Boynton, Continued) as best as possible, and in his opinion this plan is acceptable Lindquist moved, Nygard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2410, 1973 Eagerness Point Road, permitting a variance to hardcover in the 0-75* setback and in the 75-250* setback as proposed, a variance to the 30 foot setback from the street to allow the garage, variances to lot area and lot width, and denial of the conditional use permit for land alteration in the lakeshore setback, with the understanding that the grade will remain as presently exists. The Planning Commission finds that a hardship does exist for lot area, lot width and the 75 foot lakeshore setback due to the two lakeshore setbacks and the minimal amount of land available for a residence to be constructed on. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#2) #2501 CITY OF ORONO, 3601 BAYSIDE ROAD • VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Weinberger stated that the City of Orono is requesting a conditional use permit and variance to relocate an existing dock at the north end of Stubbs Bay. Weinberger commented that this application was reviewed at the June Planning Commission meeting. The City of Orono has maintained a municipal dock and walking path for many years on the north end of Stubbs Bay. A recent survey by an adjacent property owner revealed that the dock and path were not located on City owned property. The dock has since been relocated on City property. Relocating the dock and walking path within the undeveloped Oak Street will require filling a small amount of wetland for the path. A small amount of fill is necessary to provide better access and handicapped access to the dock, which has existed for a number of years. This area also exists as a snowmobile access to Lake Minnetonka Smith commented that snowmobiles are not allowed east of Stubbs Bay. Weinberger stated the City is proposing to place 180 square feet of fill in the wetland to create a base to accommodate a walking path to access the dock. The Wetland Conservation Act allows filling of wetlands up to 400 cubic feet if certain measures of avoidance and minimization are demonstrated. A permit is required from the MCWD to fill.1 Weinberger noted that the City has received a number of phone calls requesting that the dock remain as well as requests that s^ me additional improvements to this area be made. The Parks Commission has reviewed this application and has concluded that this area will not be developed as parkland. The small size of the property limits any recreational use or placement of picnic tables on the site. This dock is intended for pedestrian use only and not for boat storage, with no parking being allowed along Bayside Road City Staff is recommending approval of this application Gappa stated that the dock was relocated a few years ago. with direction being given by the City Council that this access be upgraded Gappa commented that the fill is needed due to the uneven topography of the land. Gappa stated that this request is reasonable and necessary in order to improve the dock and walkway. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (#2501 City of Orono, Continued) should be maintained and improved, noting that the present dock is not very stable. Mueller commented that she had questioned whether a bench could be located near the dock, and inquired v hetherthat would be permitted. Mueller stated as far as drainage is concerned, there is a catch basin and culvert in the area, which should be able to handle the runoff from the street. Jeff Mueller, 222 Bederwood Drive, commented he would like to see the dock improved, noting that he is not in favor of wetlands being filled, but that this dock should be accessible. Sherokee Use, Parks Commission, stated this application has appeared before the Parks Commission twice, with the general consensus of the commission that the filling of the wetland should be avoided if at all possible. Use commented that the Parks Commission would like to see the dock extended. Use also inquired if the fill was to be located in the area where the cattails have been cut down Gappa stated he was unfamiliar with what area had been cut down Use stated that she personally is concerned that the City of Orono is setting a bad precedent by allowing the wetland to be filled, and urged the Planning Commission to consider other options. Use stated that the catch basin in this area appears to be clogged, and that in her opinion any fill placed in the wetland will wash away due to the runoff from the street. Use stressed the importance of the wetlands and how they should be preserved. Hawn inquired whether extension of the dock has hr- r^'ns d by City Staff. Gappa stated that extension of the dock would be ;ue to the uneven topography in the area. Gappa stated it is the City's intention to direct the water runoff around the walkway and to have the area reseeded. Stoddard inquired whether filling of the wetlands would impact the number of snowmobilers who currently access the lake from this area. Stoddard noted that handicap accessibility is one reason for the nil. Gappa stated it is his understanding that snowmobiles are not allowed east of Stubbs Bay and that this is a connection to the Luce Line, which has existed for many years. Jeff Mueller commented that the Snowmobile Association paid a significant amount of money for that access and that this fill should not increase the number of snowmobilers who utilize this access Gappa stated that the City will make this dock handicap accessible, noting that it is not the City's intention to allow boat launching in this area. Smith inquired how the City's survey could be inaccurate Gappa stated that there was a change in ownership of the adjoining property, with the previous owner never raising an issue with the location of the dock. Gappa noted that the City has verified the property lines. Kluth comme'^'ied that the City may legally be entitled to keep the dock in its old location due to the fact that it existed in that location for a number of years. Page 4 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19.1999 (#2501 City of Orono, Continued) Gappa stated that was considered and it was determined that it was easier to move the dock than to contest it legally. Hawn commented that in her view she does not see a compelling reason why the fill should be approved. Hawn noted that a tetter from Madeline Pigeon was received indicating that she is not in support of this project, citing increased snowmobile traffic and runoff into the lake. Use remarked that she has not heard any negative comments regarding the snowmobilers, but suggested that a snow fence be erected in this area. Smith commented that the amount of fill being requested should not be minimized, and inquired how the amount of fill for this project compares with other applications requesting fill to be placed in wetlands. Gappa stated that the amount of fill proposed is approximately a truck and a half of dirt, noting that the Wetland Conservation Act allows filling of wetlands up to 400 cubic feet and the amount of fill being proposed is minimal. Smith questioned whether the Planning Commission would approve other applications where a request is being made to fill wetlands. Gappa stated that filling of wetlands is mitigated through the Watershed District. Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2501, City of Orono, 3601 Bayside Road, to grant a conditional use permit permitting 21.11 cubic yards of fill, and to grant a variance to hardcover within the 75' setback to permit 180 square feet of hardcover, subject to the condition that the Public Works Director personally oversee all work on this project to insure that the cattails and slopes are reseeded and that proper drainage is achieved into the wetland from the road, and that the Parks Commission review this application prior to any work being commenced. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 1, Hawn Opposed. Hawn indicated she was opposed to this motion because in her view it sets a dangerous precedent. Hawn commented that she would like to see the Public Works Department pursue installation of a snow fence in this area Nygard commented that he would like to see improvements to the dock pursued as well SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING (#3) #2479 PETER ANDREA COMPANY. 555 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH - CLASS III SUBDIVISION. 7:15 p.m. • 8:05 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted Mark Gronberg, Surveyor, and Jim Deanovic, Peter Andrea Co., were present Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing a seven lot subdivision for property located at 555 Stubbs Bay Road North. The developer has addressed most of the issues previously discussed Page 5 J ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19.1999 (#2479 Peter Andrea Company, Continued) by the Planning Commission. Preliminary septic reports have been reviewed and conditionally approved by Steve Weckman. The proposed subdivision creates a rural residential development with five plus acre lots served by private septic systems and individual wells. The proposed subdivision is in keeping with the general character of the neighborhood. Due to the topography of the site and wetlands, many of the lots are irregular in size and shape, but each lot appears to demonstrate a suitable building site within the required setbacks and allow for a primary and secondary septic site. Weinberger stated that Outlet A is intended to be a private road held by the Homeowners Association and will be responsible for the maintenance of the private road. The outlet is platted at 1,100 feet in length, with City Code allowing a maximum of 1,000 feet for cul-de-sacs. The road is being platted with the intent to extend the road when access is required to the west. Future extension of the cul-de-sac is shown as Outlet B. Weinberger stated that this development lies within two major drainage districts. The City Engineer is recommending that the final plans include water quality provisions for storm water leaving the northerly and southerly portions of the site, subject to the condition that the City Engineer reviews and approves the drainage plan and stormwater treatment pond within the development. Weinberger noted that the City of Orono has not adopted a stormwater management plan at this time, but at this time are requesting that money be escrowed in order to cover the expenses of future ponding. Weinberger commented that an adjacent property owner has expressed concerns about the impact of the private road in relation to her property to the east as it relates to traffic and headlights from vehicles entering Stubbs Bay Road. Weinberger stated that City Staff has looked at other possible locations for the driveway but feels that the proposed location of the road is the only suitable location due to the location of the stormwater management pond as well as the negative impact other road locations would have on the building sites for Lots 3 and 4. City Staff is recommending approval of this application subject to the conditions outlined In the Planner’s Report. Gronberg stated that the proposed drainage plan will capture approximately 85 percent of the runoff from the road and divert it into the pond. Gronberg commented that buffer strips have been discussed as an alternative to ponding. Deanovic stated that this is the first time that he has been informed about an escrow for future ponding, noting that this application was filed approximately six months ago. Hawn remarked that the Planning Commission usually defers to the City Engineer on any issues relating to drainage and grading. Gronberg commented in his view this issue could be worked out. Weinberger stated that it is possible that some buffering could be done in this development. Hawn inquired whether there were any public comments regarding this application. Donna Gause, 480 Stubbs Bay Road North, inquired whether the road could be located In another location. Page 6 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19.1999 (#2479 Peter Andrea Company, Continued) Weinberger stated that they have considered other locations but the proposed location works best for the entire development. Cause expressed concerns regarding water runoff, noting that a large amount of wetland exists in this area. Don Cause expressed a concern that the water runoff from the road will go directly into his driveway, noting that he currently is experiencing water runoff from Stubbs Bay Road, and that this issue needs to be addressed further. Cronberg stated that they are proposing to install a culvert and construct ditches in order to capture the water runoff and divert it into the holding pond. Hawn stated that the City Engineer will need to review and approve all drainage and grading plans for this subdivision and that the City will need to take appropriate steps to insure that proper drainage is achieved. Hawn inquired what, if anything, could be done to prevent headlights from shining into the Cause's residence. Hawn commented that the trees presently located in that area will help shield it somewhat. Hawn encouraged the developer to discuss this matter with the affected property owner. Cronberg stated they are willing to discuss this issue with the Cause's. Steve Harris, 385 Turham Road, inquired about the road easement in the southwest comer of this development. Weinberger stated that easement was actually a platted road at one time, but the City has never developed it. Weinberger stated that the City requires roads to be platted through if access is needed for future lots and that future access to the west could be created if necessary Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2479, Peter Andrea Company, 555 Stubbs Bay Road North, subject to the conditions outlined in the July 19,1999 Planner's Report, with consideration being given to turning the road slightly to the south to alleviate the headlight concern. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS (#4) #2502 ORONO SELF SERVE - 2160 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 8:06 p.m. - 8:10 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted Bill Wear. Applicant, was present Jenson stated that the Applicant is requesting an amendment to his conditional use permit to add a canopy and a variance to allow the canopy to be located six feet from the property line. The Applicant had previously submitted an application two years ago on the same request The Planning Commission at that time recommended approval of the application This item, however, did not proceed to the City Council as City Staff did not receive the required information from the Applicant. Page 7 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (#2502 Orono Self Serve, Continued) City Star is recommending approval of this application. Smith inquired whether this was the same basic application that was submitted two years ago. Jenson stated that it was. Wear had no comment. There were no public comments. Smith moved, Stoddard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2502, Orono Self Serve, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard, granting an amendment to his conditional use permit to add a canopy, and a variance to allow the canopy to be located six feet from the property line. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#5) #2503 CITY OF ORONO, VACATION OF ALLEY ON PLAT OF BERGQUIST & WICKLUND'S ADDITION. ADJACENT TO SAGA HILL PRESERVE, 8:11 p.m. - 8:15 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Jenson stated that the City of Orono is requesting vacation of a dedicated alley in the Bergquist and Wickland's Addition to Bergquist & Wickland's Park in order to provide better public access to the Saga Hill Preserve and to replace it with a shorter, more direct access. This public hearing is required for the vacation of the current alley and not the dedication of the new alley. Hawn inquired vrhether there were any public comments regarding this application. Wally Holzer, 1130 North Shore Drive West, inquired whether the easement was being eliminated. Hawn stated that it is. Hawn commented that this application relates to a larger agreement. Weinberger stated that the vacation of the alley will return the land back to the individual property owners and a new access to the park will be proposed. Lindquist inquired whether Holzer had seen the new proposed access. Holzer stated he has and is not opposed to it. Lindquist noted that the Planning Commission is just voting on the vacation Berg moved. Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2503, City of Orono, granting of the vacation of the alley in Bergquist and Wickland's Addition to Bergquist and 'Wickland's Park. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#6) #2504 WARREN AND TANA GARRETT, 650 BROWN ROAD NORTH - VARIANCES, 8:16 p.m. to 8:29 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Page 8 1 i F:iir«nfw r^wtwii [tTOlTrilt mntit] rtnvt ^riTiT^i iT*wnyi •TC;;ci f [•YUMK lift RITiiniItTfriIi [•»: MltlM • ■Ilf: •IikiLtMililt ri^iT:lUWraf:fJtI:I»l»lfSliI*lHMlKllil*llTM*W rmvTiTi rtifti# rmnw* r«T:Tr»mTi^rf:i«]mntifiAViiit]•U;kW4«IiI^Iira raiil: rfTOKTt] nnif:ir:l«lllf: ^ H • .1^iTiraiWUE iT«:Mil:TO ^ ri n n n»Tii*iT* r« n imimo •loniii*riT»r*T»] iFin ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19.1999 (#2474 Steven and Susan Wilson, Continued) The Certiticate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted Steven Wilson, Applicant, was present Weinberger stated that the Planning Commission and City Council has recently approved a subdivision of a lot line rearamgement for properties located at 325 South Brown Road and 2150 Abingdon Way. City Code requires that the Applicants dedicate drainage and utility easements along all newly created property lines, which have been granted along the new property line. However, the previous underlying drainage and utility easement along the old property line was not vacated at the time the subdivision was approved, which should be vacated. Staff is recommending approval of this application Wilson had no comment. Hawn inquired whether the Applicant would be agreeable to affirming the agreement with Abingdon Way. Wilson stated it would not be an affirmation, but merely notifying the owners of each lot in this division that they are iiable for each easement. Wilson stated he would approach the homeowners association requesting that the 60 foot pathway be eliminated from their agreement, which requires City agreement. Hawn inquired whether that portion was before the Planning Commission as part of this application and whether any legal notice must be given to the adjoining property owners. Gaffron stated that it was, noting that technically action by the Planning Commission may not be required. Gaffron stated that in his opinion no notice is required. There were no public comments. Smith moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2474, 325 Brown Road South/2150 Abingdon Way, vacating the 10 foot wide drainage and utility easement along the previously existing property line between 325 South Brown Road and 2150 Abingdon Way based, and as a result of the lot line rearrangement, the obligation to maintain Abingdon Way will be maintained solely by Lot 5, west of the east 60 foot line, and not Lot 6. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW (#8) #2505 THE BANCOR GROUP, INC., WILLOW DRIVeSTH AVENUE NORTH • SKETCH PLAN David Newman. Bancor Group, was present, along with Marty Campion. P E., of Otto & Associates. Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to develop a 58 acre parcel located at the southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North The Applicants have proposed a concept plan to subdivide the property into 52 lots, with an average density of less than one acre per lot. The property is zoned RR-1B, which requires two acres per unit. The Applicants are requesting that the property be rezoned to R-1A. allowing one acre per unit density, and to develop the Page 10 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (#2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Continued) property as a Planned Residential Development. The purpose of a PRD is to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation of natural open spaces and to counteract the effects of urban congestion. A PRD would allow the property to be developed at one unit per acre, with City sewer and water being available to these proposed units. This property could not sustain a rural style development with individual septic systems due to the high water table and soil types present. Weinberger stated that the property to the south may be developed at a slightly higher density, with a two acre density development east of Willrw Drive, a low density residential neighborhood north of County Road 6, and the Orono School Campus to the west. This development would serve as a buffer between the lower density residential development to the north and east versus the other land uses to the south and west. The Applicants are proposing a plan that would result in the nearest home being located approximately 225 feet from County Road 6. Several berms are being proposed throughout the development, and each lot will be regraded to create walkout style homes. Access to this development would be off of Willow Drive, with no access off of County Road 6. City Staff recommends that the proposed intersection between the development and Shadowood Drive be aligned, whether it’s through the extension of the northerly road or the other curb cut being relocated further north, to eliminate traffic turning left. The access points are proposed to be approximately 200 feet apart. Weinberger stated that standard drainage and utility easements would be required, as well as parkland dedication. Weinberger stated the Applicants could have the option of donating 8 percent of the land value or designating a portion of the development for trails Weinberger stated that the hookup costs for City sewer and water will need to be discussed further. Weinberger noted that the City Council has established less restrictive zoning standards for other PRDS, including French Creek and Sugarwoods. Lindquist commented that he is hesitant to approve rezoning of this area due to the high density housing that is being proposed. Newman stated that the high density is necessary due to the connection costs for City sewer and water, noting that they have reviewed the costs involved in this project and that in order to offset their expenses, upper market housing will need to be constructed in this area Lindquist inquired whether they have calculated the average lot size for this development Newman replied they have not yet made that calculation Campion stated that they are contemplating lots that average around a half-acre, with the smallest being one-third acre. Stoddard commented that he would like to see a residential development in this area, but that in his view the City Council may wish to retain the two acre zoning Stoddard stated he is unaware of the economics involved for this development, but that he personally would like to see larger lots. Newman stated that this is an expensive parcel of property to develop, and that not all the residences will be constructed with walkouts Page 11 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19,1999 (#2505 The Bancor Group, Inc., Continued) Campion slated that the walkouts are necessary due to the high water table and soil conditions in the area. Newman stated that they have obtained two sets of soil borings because of the high water table and soils in the area. Hawn commented that the City is interested in providing more affordable housing and that the proposed high density will present drainage problems, Hawn inquired whether a landscaping plan has been developed in more depth. Newman stated they have not designed anything specifically for this development at this time. Newman stated in his opinion this site will never be developed for first time home buyers due to the high costs associated with developing this piece of property and that they are contemplating houses in the $350,0001 j $600,000 range. Berg questioneo whether the location of the access is an issue. Berg commented that she would also like to see lower density in this area, noting that in her view some of the proposed lots will be unbulidable due to the small lot size and large pond located in the area. Weinberger stated that the final location of the road will need to be reviewed once the layout of the units is determined. Newman stated they have not reviewed whether the lots contain suitable building pads at this time, which will need to be addressed. Lindquist remarked that the developer will also need to submit a drainage and grading plan, noting that some wetlands do exist in the area. Stoddard stated in his opinion it is doubtful that any zoning under two acres will be approved Smith commented that the residents are starting to take the view that the holding ponds are a natural feature to the area but should not be turned into private beaches. Smith stated that residents are also hesitant to have trails located close to their homes. Smith stated in her opinion the two acre zoning should be adhered to. Newman stated that he is committed to this project. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#9) REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETINGS ON JUNE 28,1999 AND JULY 12,1999 This item was not discussed. (#10) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION None Page 12 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 19.1999 (#11) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR JUNE 21.1999 Smith moved, Lindquist approved, to approve the minutes of the Regular Planning Commission meeting of June 21.1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0, Kluth Abstained. (#12) SELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ON JULY 26.1999 AND AUGUST 9,1999 July 26 • Hawn August 9 • Smith ADJOURNMENT Berg moved, Hawn seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 9:22 p.m. Elizabeth Hawn, Chair Page 13