Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04-19-1999 Planning Packet
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, April 19,1999—6:30 p.m. 2780 Kelley Parkway—Council Chambers AGENDA Council Representative: Richard Flint AUDIENCE MEMBERS: Please sign in for the public record at the front podium if you wish to address the Planning Commission. Applicants will be asked to move to the front table to answer questions when the Chair announces the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for the May 10, 1999, City Council meeting unless otherwise noted by the Chair. OLD BUSINESS Review of these items will commence prior to or beUveen scheduled public hearings, 1.^2410 Peter Boynton, 1973 Eagerness Point Road, Variance/Conditional Use Permit. (Staff: Liz Van Zomeren).Ir 4 sv' H 2.#2444 3.#2468 4.#2457 Brian and Susan Schebler, 1354 Rest Point Circle, Variance. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). Bruce and Betsy Nusbaum, 3480 North Shore Drive, Variances. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). Paula and David Lindberg, 1392 Baldur Park Road, Variances and Conditional Use Permit. (Staff: Liz Van Zomeren). SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:00 p.m. 5.#2477 7:15 p.m. 6.#2474 7:30 p.m. 7.#2479 George Stickney, 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South, Class IB Subdivision. (Staff: Liz Van Zomeren). Susan Wilson, 325 Brown Road South/2510 Abingdon Way, Lot Line Rearrangement. (Staff: Liz Van Zomeren). Peter Andrea Co., 555 Stubbs Bay Road, Class HI Subdivision. (Staff: Liz Van Zomeren). 7:45 p.m. 8. #2480 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North, Class II Subdivision. (Staff: Mike Gafifron). NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.#2473 10.#2475 11.#2478 12.#2472 13.#2481 14.#2482 Matthew B. Herman, 3825 Cheny Avenue, Variances. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). Ronald P. Zelinsl^, Jr., 320 Tumham Road, Variance. (Staff; Liz Van Zomeren). Gerald and Karla Arne, 940 Dakota Avenue, Variance. (Staff; Liz Van Zomeren). - w .'1 Kd Sandra S. Larson, 540 Orono Orchard Road, Variance. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North, Rezoning. (Staff: Mike Gafffon). Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North, Conditional Use Permit. (Staff: Mike Gafffon). SKETCH PLAN REVIEW 15. #2469/2470 Steve and Jo Webster, 500 Orono Orchard Road, Sketch Plan/Variance. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). 16. #2476 Chris Diesen, 1100 Townline Road, Two Lot Subdivision Sketch Plan. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 17. Report of Planning Commission representatives attending Council meetings on March 22, 1999 and April 12, 1999. 18. Other issues for discussion. 19. Planning Commission approval of minutes for March 15,1999. Selection of representatives for City Council meetings on April 26, 1999 and May 10, 1999.20. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE ITEM NO. 1 - NOT ON AGENDA TONIGHT. ITEM NO. 11 - APPLICANTS HAVE REQUESTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION. Public A ttendance Meeting D ate m-. / f- f 7 □ C ouncil Planning C ommission Park C ommission Iv Please fill out the information vv M BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. fei-. □ Other NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 1. ^/;?7n f' f\-^y P~^- . iJ '^Ye)S /Vc.2 3. 7/:>y^5 .1) A >/ )?uy i‘(?c crvi //(OO •’/dvQ/i/y / ic* )■} > S t ■j'A S '5 isjf'*!M/*»i / V ^^171 7. c'a. r ’.Xr 1 UA> ^A4f \ ij\C J t~> j,-----^ 8.f'V\ V_____—C »■'1 7\ Or (7 ,1 'Z-r-7»o *"-fr — -T fi . /■’ ( ■' UIJ f.,7J>v A / / /r^ A / ♦\.kA<i 4kC SVuU> f'V L^V ---- uik S Slivt /^A C/"-^ C*1 iLi__4 \AVAva 13?N U \ ►V v| H7 . A ' 14. 15. mvmA TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger* Assistant Zoning Administrator April 7,1999 #2444 Brian and Susan Schebler 1354 Rest Point Circle Afler-the-Fact Variance-Public Hearing ____ Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area:31,200 square feet (.72 acre) Application: The applicants are requesting an after-the-fect variance to permit a detached, ground level deck located on the lakeside of the residence. The deck is located behind the 75' lakeshore setback. The actual distance from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of Lake Minnetonka to the deck is 86*. The deck is 12' by 16' and is located further back on the lot than the neighboring house to the east. The neighboring house to the west is located further back from the lake, but would not be impacted due to the applicant's home screening the deck from that property. A large addition to the home was constructed in 1989. Approval was subject to previous property owners removing a gravel parking area on the property and reducing the size of the driveway. As of the date of the most recent survey, and site inspections on February 25,1999 and April 6,1999, it has been determined the hardcover has not been removed. Staff could support retaining the existing driveway for maintenance and public safety and allowing the gravel parking area to remain. The applicant's have stated the gravel parking area is used for snow storage by the City. Additional hardcover on the lot includes areas of rock. No plastic or fabric is .under the rock preventing water from infiltrating into the ground. The applicants have stated they have removed much of the hardcover, but the rock located in the area around the driveway is to prevent erosion as the lot is sloped and much of the drainage in the locality is over their property. The rock on the lakeside of the home (all outside of the 75' setback) is located in an area that does not receive any sunlight, preventing grass from growing in that area. 1^2444 Brian and Susan Schel *er iJ54R^st Point Circle Afier-the-Fact Variance 4/19/99 Pagel This application requires the following after-the-fact variance: 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2): To allow 5,593 s.f. (29.9%) of hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback, where 5,593 s.f. (29.9%) exists and 4,675 s.f (25%) is allowed. ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IB (1 acre) Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Lakeshore Required 43,560 s.f 140*35'10’75’ Proposed 31,200 s.f 121*NA 26 ’86' The deck is located within all required setbacks on the property. Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0-75’9,250 s.f 435 s.f (4.7%) none (0%) 435 s.t. (4.7%) none 75-250*18,700 s.f 5,593 s.f (29.9%) 4,675 s.f (25%) 5,593 s.f (29.9%) The deck is 195 s.f of the calculated hardcover. 250-500’3,250 s.f 409 s.f (12.58%) 975 s.f (30%) 409 s.f (12.58%) none 500-1000'0 0 0 (35%) 0 none §2444 Brian and Susan SchtbUr U54 Rest Point Circle 4fter-ihe-Fact Variance 4/19/99 Page! Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 31.200 s.f.Existing: 3,821 s.f.12.2% The property is allowed 4,680 s.f. of structure. Decks are not considered structure unless they exceed 6' above grade. The subject deck is not structure. Variance STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant's have included their statement of hardship as Exhibit B. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. ISSUfiS 1.A building plan was approved for an addition to the residence in 1989 by previous property owners. Some hardcover that was required to be removed remains on the property. 2.Would variances be granted on the deck if the applicants had appeared before the Planning Commission prior to construction? 3. 4. 5. The deck is located behind the 75' lakeshore setback (86' from the OHWL). The applicants have stated the gravel parking area is used for snow storage by the City. The lot is located on a comer of Rest Point Circle. The road is only platted 12' wide at the most narrow point. Requirements of the subdivision code would plat this road much wider providing space for plowed snow to be stored. 6.Erosion on the property is controlled by rock along drainage areas. The rock is an asset to the property. U2444 Brian and Susan Schebler 1354 lUst Point Circle 4fter-the-Fact Varlanci 4/19/99 Page 3 J STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of an after-the-fact variance to permit the 12' by 16' detached deck based on the following hardships: 1.Much of the existing hardcover on the property could be removed, however the rock is not underlain by any impervious materials. Also the rock located around the driveway protects this portion of the property firom erosion as much of the drainage in die locality follows the slope. Planting grass would create a maintenance problem as a steep slope exists. 2.The rock on the lakeside of the home (all outside of the 75* setback) is located in an area that does not receive any sunlight, preventing grass from growing in that area. 3.The gravel parking area located on the north part of the property benefits the locality as it is used for parking by the home owners and provides an area for snow storage. The applicants ^ve stated plowed snow is stored on their property. Rest Point Circle is a narrowly platted road and no storage area is available along the side of the street Attachments A B C D E F G H I J Application Description of Request and Statement of Hardship Site Plan/Survey 1989 Site Plan Plat Map Location Map Hardcover Worksheets Deck Drawings/Plan Property Owners List Permit Record §2444 BrkmmiSumi SchtbUr 1354 Rtil Faint Circle Afier^the»Faet Variance 4/19/99 Fate A Application # d? • Date ReceWed V/ -9^ m • 9m mm tm m mm ^ mm T • m m • *••• ^ «• • •• m m • mm • •• • , • • I Amount Paid.^^-<g ’* ^ mm» »•■••• • • •• • • • ;/••• •% • » •__. I • PLICATION «M*« «4 • fc • * • 4 * ••• • \ • • • •• •• .dry OF ORONO - •* . . ^ .Inidal Application Fc^$!250.p0 * C .(S50.00 per[4Mcli..ad3SdOiul Renewal .Variance Fee ^$150.00-../ . .a ’ (no change from original application) •. . , Variwee for non-coirioiming structures * $250.00 . . Aftcr-the-Fact Fees .(Double application fee) •• **• • • * *««*^*« PROPERTY INFORMATION . . . . . : / ^ ^ SiteAddress ■A'iSV CtACt^—u-OMt^O * Property Identification Number 0P*i*D*). ^ ^ mm m■Attach legal description to application if .not included on required survey • * ___ . * A m m * "Date Property Acqmred S/21 • • • (xnonthtyear) 1 (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X residential ___other (^ccify), ZonlngDistrict:_ APPUCAOT .. . le />rtafi * fut Scke.i(crNam Adf-£^ss i /IXV Rtit Ae\/^^,rcU City:. ' Or^dl Phone fhomel •OtQ^ Phone fwodc> * 9Jt 77^ ( p\YNER (if different than appheant) Name ____________:________ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:SZTCity: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST •# • • • • Estimated Construction Cost $ STX) Describe request in detail: fiotn^aeJn^ dfi^lk—aisA—Z2 _ ^ :h afi<J . VARIANCES REQUIRED 'V. * ;*• „ • . , . ^ Lot Area'. " LotWdth' .-.^Hardcover . ^:—.Lot .Coverage Rear Average LakeshoreSetback:■Front Side • ^ a _ Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTiON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY COi^mONS Describe undue har^hip or practical difficiilty or unusual property conditiora preventmg . compliance with Zoning Code T^gniremeats : fiffdutt ^ ' nA Ar. cra^ ^tcAe la .r. Hl* /i&At U /V^cA. A.---ci*-^A ' (ft^ *(y*~ . (attach addiuonai sneers u ncywaoijy dc<A ^ 6c. c^s/xecAy A Atft^u^ fyj ^ c/ecAy /ar *! .1 M __p/ZoPir^ry-Cd^Cm^^ 4/L • i’ ./<itUMxtL_txk^cr^——Sc^hALCtr—^—W7-^- —ujyfc«cjL_.;^0»e _5^^ - ----MSZ*:^ •I * • ■. • • "j—^.^C—.i^ ../d^CLth -/’Xx. -j—<Ld4—dJAKfhJ.— Qre.0,—/$/:... Out—^.c6i_ I* Jk. m ^ ^ ^ i ^ ^ A ■ Tj r.vwv c * gc u/ylC^M— 4j—AtMifw/Lt---OAd-^rjtZ(.^^€i-.^^e^iy^fyjL^i(UcJi _^ ^ ----S.tCO<A4JZ-t^—tlJL— •. •I ^^—//€iCx—a —^OuaU.—CtJJ-Y.eAl)—Cltck^-<LO^j — iu.<t£L .1 /iU—6^—JtAjcn^^o rcK.- 4<0^ ,---y>~.I ----------------------- --------- _ 4o-4lt—fij—^$2s/—^—<4u^^/v«cyt«i^—A* —yOt^4/% C^—ottAi—— J/16A£^ 6 Cr/icdif/l. r---Va£A<4M — -----UAOf.U (f/ttt ^ ^5l<----d/'Ceu-----^Ix-. ■j——AaAaJ.A.——/^U.—/Vit.^ki*/Aoot(—-TX*.—4 a.cA. ja___CslA. ' .1 tMtfk*A.—t/t*,t>i—(A—/7^— A a/n-t*/- _j'//f._>^/‘4u/».—A dcX—//in4<.. ■A» -----/^^Jkr—fpjciis. .^a4.—/A /}Vh<.~/kj<—Ca A k ----72la.4^._ .1$__..^Tq. --------------^tCAujx_ —jajA/—^_Ps/,.//^o<A/L.Ajt^^.-4Ajk^(/^/.-X^^_<(££4l- k_y!k>. f-g- ■’WJ » • •• «»4 «l • • • r i* CERTI OF LOT LOT I HENNEf LCCAt ocsatpn» Lot 11. -SUBOVISK Lot u "Rost Poir Thio agrvty ahowi th0 locot'On of on tn«^«on. n oon ne oncrootfMMntS. o : Iron irortii Boorin^i aftown ora (iecW • • . ■> f . •iv*; ' • **C3 I Ai<F UlKUkic-T/WB^A -Vi. Oi^ONO Ccrtlflcattof Survty for C.J. V«llln KoocbuliOtrs of Lot 13. Rost roint fork and Lot II. SuMIvtslon of Lot 14. Rost Folnt firk Ntnntpln County. Mlnntsota S Sv9uve AS SHPM/J AS ti£c€ssAA>t TO n/«A»MrA/Af bHAiAjA^e HOWfl? MtTM /v)0 AKbTC I>/ZA|/VA&^ "fo /\Jei64fdoK4^c RaoFtazr/e: (APS^ see House r^’lS r-"’ c-rcK 0*F5 75-fie >X5e “£*nceHtfA 3tS*Uffi M4S*SfA 0 Sl«tbwr *49%7.)7%c 0 t§5%A*C fievtiet^ HAROcef^eiZ 5crteoUt^i*>5''«o ►ay'.sr^ (|CC|V*o\fe ©/«-0»vilT. /rr»HS Ml Btue) A i>»iJ tuef /.»/ ^ CITYOFJIRONO X SITE PUN Jl CRAOIHG PLAN IJAPP80VE0 X appw WITH nSVtSiONSAPPROVED VnTH R^VCIOnS □ OK BY.J DATE wz. Ixrcby certify that this It a true and SUOOIVISION OF LOT 14 RCST POINT PARK «nd thf locitlon of «11 txlstlng bglldlngi or oncrodCtatAtie rrcct rcprcstntitlon of i survt/ of the boundaries of lot fl, MlHNCTOfocA* and lot 13, “RfSt Point Park Hennepin Co;, Minn." thereon. It does not purport to show an/ other Isproveceaits COFfIN a GAONBCRG, INC. rf i Ki.i UKESHOflEfi.VVCTuS~^"f;S; tSifST”"’ ^1,^ 0 : Iron aarker : Spot elevation Mean Sea levela;V l»'^ • •N^r •••+ ■* R E G U L A T j G jV n pnON'O ORO!f; V V.. OriEOGIfJO. Wl I Hlf a $J(i FT ()^P.*;VV» I /i**;. . .... f 177SS nners r. 'Cs& • . ........f j< >.... »B.V.' • •• •r5 PifiM'f.n nr^*A%*., Huf#. # • •. •..•. . • ooc NO 3309 » 4.A. 5 B :i_, ^14-,CjT ^ 1 i' • 'i ^wasLe^' Kasr'rh/hjr HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET * • SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE 0^ 75-250’ 250-500’ F.X1STING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _____________ X • • • • •Uriiib''Widih B. C. Driveway D. Sidewalk X X X 8 22. E. Petio/Deckvj^ W4CC3 JL-Landscape ^ Underlain ~ By Plastic O,^ 6.B <3, A X X X X X X X X X /w /♦g ^S4 • • » • % iO 2. 4^1 G. Other 21L 2^ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 4-S6 -»• B X 100 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _____________ X Lenfdi Width B. Garage C. Driveway D.. Sidewalk. •• • • • • E. Pacio/Dcck F. Undscipe Underlain By Plasilc G. Other X X X X X X X X cs ISS TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _____________ + B .X 100 500-1000* S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.• S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % • f S.F. A S.F. B % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. A - B //>eM HARDCOVER C a LCULA'UO.N jjKualii:.*:. i SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 250-500’ 500-I000* >•« r ;• •^•^T* • • • • .FXISTING HARPCOVER W y.hNP A. Hou$« _ ••tUonrfUtt*** •A-»- l»—/•- Lfn|(h ..a • • • Wi^lh hJO , WAt-9t. * n • • X- X X • ^ • mttl **.B« >••!• .. . •._ n^iiiin II I I ■••■■■■• ‘*•'• C. Driveway ‘•• . • X X H •• # *\ - D.90 77 X X ^.7 a.6 'PatloTOeck •a • .•^.0 X X . J2.Z F. Ltodictpe ^ JZoc^j^ iftP’'” A/.gog-iZ By PlMilc £j:_SS£dkU^P^5 X X X ;!*ir;v! 0; ’ Oihcc' y X • • : •• • .vujr« ir TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE r- wI9IAlr. PRQPWy. AREA IN ZONE. ^ ----^^d>s + B '/B7ao X 100 - ft ‘ PROPOSED HARDCOVRR m 7r)^pp . ii:*<r *AV. Houie___________ * v?'V ’ “ •“-■-'•’‘•"•’LciipK* *'•Width •4^.A X X X B. Oaraie’ :■»:• ’ • ••Driveway • #* jffjff ‘^/D/ -SldewilK • • ••X X •-W.*. X X • •!•*•*' , ,,, , • E. Pitio/Deck ■. ,H/ ,..Uw<4fJpe -.X • UoderUln —“-By-rtodc-; X X x‘ lr-!i=T •0. Other w* •.*• • ••.■:T0TAL-HARDCOVER IN ZONE total P’R'OPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ■ • ___________ + B. ■i.. .•a X too fer t.- * :/• m * . S.E. ; S.F. S.F. n: S.F. S.F. 9o^ S.F. t&yaG S.F.B . S.F, .• I.*.' S.F. . S.F. •' S»F«* S.F. s.f; S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ♦ » S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B • • •• . f//s/f9 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WOUKSHKtl Me$r ^__________ SETBA'CK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* 75-250’ pSO-SOO^500-1000* • • •• • • • ^yirriNC HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _______________ X • • • • • • m ••• •••Unsth WMlh ••«»••• ••« . • • •B. Carege C. Driveway % > : X X D. Sidewalk X X e •E. PatioZDeck F. Landscape Underlain By Ptasile X X X G. Other • • •.S%- —0."7 • \ / • • • ••• •• ••>v • • •• •• « • • -• TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE • TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE *-•••••• ■ • -^ B 3ZBo 4^9 '3’Z^ X 100 /2,S& ppnpn.«;pn hardcover tn House • • • •• • • • • • • •.................L«n|th Width X X X • •• • • ,a • • B. Oarage • • C. Driveway X • M ■ • • • t D. Sidewalk • • • • : .v > X X E. Patio/Deck • ••• F. Landscape Underlain -----By Plastic X X •• • • 0. Other mm • •TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •_____ B.X 100 S.F. ^ S.F.. S.F. ^ S.F. ■ S.F. S.F. S.F. • • • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. fd S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A 6 .. S.Fr • S.F. ■ A B « 4 1 f RUN DATE 12/09/98 BATCH SOS PROP AODR ONNCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHR/ADOR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER . NAME/AODR 38 07-117-23 31 0018 01347 REST POINT CXR H E PXNEOAR 8 R A PINEOAR WILLIAM 8 REBECCA PINEOAR 1347 REST POINT CXR HOUND HN 55364 38 87-117-23 31 0824 ■ 01350 REST POINT CXR RICHARD L ANPXNSON RICHARD L ANFXNSON 1350- REST POINT CXR hound HN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0034 01365 REST POINT RD THOMAS NICHOLAS BERSCHEXD THOMAS NXCnOLAS BERSCHEXD 1365 REST POINT RD HOUND.HN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0062 01354 REST POINT CXR' • ’ B A SCHEBLER 8 S B SCHEBUR B A SCHEBLER 8 S B SCHEULER 1354 REST POINT CIR HOUND HN 55364 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY IHrORHATlOH.SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST • •44“ft "±ir ^ 38 07-117-23 31 0022 01342 REST POINT CIR H J ALTENHOFEN ET AL HARK J ALTENHOFEN ‘ 1342 REST POINT CXR HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0030 01310 REST POINT U E 0 8 C L REINHART ERIC D REINHART 1310 REST POINT U HOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 0068 01366 REST POINT RD UWRENCE E 8 HaEN LAN6HANS LAWRENCE E 8 HKEM LANCHANS 1366 REST POINT RD • MOUND HN 55364 38 07-117-23 S3 8012- 01374 REST POINT RD 0 R BLOOM 8 T A BLOOM GEORGE R t THERESA A BLOOM 1374 REST POINT RD hound HN 55364 REPORT NO. PX43S401 . .PAGE.17 . 38 07-117-23 31 0023 01348 REST POINT CXR K 8 D HANKXNSON KEITH 0 8 DONNA M IIANKINSON 1348 REST POINT CXR HOUND HN 55364 S •38* 07-117-23 32 0031 . 01360 REST POINT CXR D 8 J BOXES JR * • DAVID B 8 JENNIFER BOIES JR 1360 REST POINT CIRaE . HOUND mi ' 55364 .• • *• •• • . •• 38 07-117-23 32 0061 . 01371 REST POINT U . KENNETH W 8 RENEE 0 EGOERT . KENNETH W 8 RENEE 0 EG6ERT ' 1371 REST POINT U HOUND HN 55364 •• . •• • •• •, •. • • » .TOTAL BATCH 503 00011 ^ • • I CERTIFY THAT THE’FACTS REPRESENTED ARE,AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATIW AS IT AP^RS TOK ^ OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATIOM> TO THE BEST OF MY KMOWLEOGE AND BELIEF. ' • •• • • • • e Permit Vo. 1163 PERMIT RECORD • Date L*^ t»t • • t TVPe o£ Permit TdOL Sfteo ST37 : m "7- ii- ’ • • • • /9/S• • • • •• • • • •• • • • • n-^D-7i * • - • . ,• HOOK UP --------------------------------7% ^-------m_1 —nhdAi^J) : 0-j</- i9 /hU ^ a 4&&-/6 -30 '?9 -X^txoAAv Oo-n/icei^, <s>M /6'30'?<? g I(o ?>3l^h^’3L^^c\ ifer II bifloin o.r.jin /0 7'7‘T'______!___.//-/:i-f/TZsiMiha/ / TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:April 5,1999 SUBJECT: #2468 Bruce and Betsy Nusbaum 3480 North Shore Drive Variances—Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1C One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 Acre) Lot Area:9,560 square feet (.22 acre) Application: Last month the Planning Commission voted to table this application to allow the Nusbaums an opportunity to reduce the proposed structural coverage, not to exceed the what currently exists on the property. The applicants have demonstrated in the revised site plan they have reduced the structural coverage as recommended by the Planning Commission. The applicants have proposed to remove the existing residence located on the lot and construct a two story house. The existing residence is a non-conforming structure as it is located on an undersized lot and encroaches into the required side yard setback. The house is located on the lot line. The new structure would be placed to meet all required setbacks. The lot is located in the LR-IC zoning district where 1/2 acre is the minimum lot size required for new eonsUuclion. The zoning district also requires 100’ lot width for new construction. The zoning code does allow certain lots to be record lots if the following conditions are met: In "R" Districts of One Acre or Less and With Public Sanitary Sewer. A lot of record existing upon the effective date of this Zoning Chapter in any "R" District of the City of up to and including one acre, which lot is serviced by public sanitary sewer and which does not meet the requirements of this Zoning Chapter as to area or width only, may be utilized for single family detached dwelling purposes without Council approval if the area measurements and width of that lot are within eighty percent (80%) of the requirements of this Zoning Chapter. However, the lot of record shall not be more intensely developed unless combined with one or more abutting lots or portions thereof so as to create a lot meeting the requirements of this Zoning Chapter. (Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (A) (1)) U2468 Bruce and Bttsy Nusbaum 3480 North Shore Drive Variances 4/19/99 Page I The applicants intend to retain the existing garage located on Birch Lane at the rear of the lot. Typically the zoning code does not allow any accessory structures to remain on a lot without a principal building. To meet the Plamiing Commission recommendation the applicants have prepared a site plan reducing the size of the garage from 30' x 22' to 20' by 22'. This application requires the following variances: 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2): To allow 2,012 s.f. (30.2%) of hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback, where 2,965 s.f. (45%) exists and 1,663.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed, and to allow 344 s.f. (46.3%) of hardcover in the 250-500' lakeshore setback, where 670 s.f. (90%) exists and 222.9 s.f (30%) is allowed. 2. 3. 4. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C): To allow 1,721 s.f (18.0%) structure, where 1,687 s.f (17.6%) exists and 1,500 s.f is allowed. Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B): To allow new construction on a lot that does not meet minimum lot area and lot width for the LR-IC zoning district. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (B): To allow the accessory structure (garage) to remain on the property while the existing principal building is removed. I.ot Area and Yards ANALYSIS LR-IC (1/2 acre) Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Street Yard Required 21,780 s.f 100'30'10'30' Proposed 9,560 s.f 50'45.1'1.0'14' New construction is only permitted on conforming lots. Variances shall be granted from Code requiremer s on lot area and lot width before a building permit can be issued 0246S Bruce and BiUy Susbaum 3480 Sorth Shore Drive Variances 4/19/99 Pagfl Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0-75'2,183 s.f.35 s.f. (1.6%) none (0%) 35 s.f. (1.6%) none 75-250'6,654 s.f.2,965 s.f. (45%) 1,663.5 s.f. (25%) 2,012 s.f. (30.2%) Topennit 2,012 s.f. 250-500'743 s.f.670 s.f. (90%) 222.9 s.f. (30%) 344 s.f. (46.3%) Topennit 344 s.f. 500-1000'0 (35%) none 0-75' Lakeshore Setback The property owners have a small concrete walk located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback. The walk is located between the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka and North Shore Drive. This hardcover is legal and is allowed by Code. 75-250* Lakeshore Setback The hardcover on the property will show a decrease, however the amount of structural hardcover will increase on the property. The increase is a result of a larger home being built on the property. The existing house is 1,023 s.f. and the proposed house is 1,281 s.f. The garage would remain on the property. 250-500' Lakeshore Setback The applicants will remove a significant amount of hardcover from this portion of the property. Most of the hardcover being removed would be from the driveway. The garage has two parking stalls that would use a driveway 20* wide. The existing arrangement has a paved area adjacent to Birch Lane 44' wide. The City allows a maximum curb cut of 20' for private driveways. The proposed changes would be a benefit to the City. §2468 Bruct and BtUy^ Susbaum 3480 North Shoro Drive Variances 4/19/99 Pagt3 Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 9,560 s.f.Existing: 1,687 s.f. Proposed: 1,721 s.f. 17.6% 18.0% The proposed addition would raise the total structure above the allowed coverage for the lot. The 2^ning Code allows a maximum 15% of the lot to be covered with structure or 1,500 s.f., whichever is greater. This lot would permit 1,500 s.f. Variance STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant's have included their statement of hardship as Exhibit B. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues 1. 2. The lot is provided with sanitary sewer service. North Shore Drive is platted through the applicants property. One side of the property is located on Lake Minnetonka (vacant) and the house is located across North Snore Drive. The entire lot is combined into one tax parcel. The platted right-of-way for North Shore Drive is dedicated to Hennepin County and is not included in the lot area calculation for hardcover or structure. 3. 4. 5. Hardcover on the lot will be decreased substantially. Structure will be increased, and will exceed the 1,500 s.f. allowed on the property. The curb cut on Birch Lane is 44 s.f. It will be reduced to meet the maximum allowed by the City (20 feet). 6.The proposed location of the house is beyond the 75* required for structure from the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. §2468 Bmct and BiUy Susbaum 3480 Sorth Short Drivt Variancts 4/19/99 Papti 7. 8. 9. The existing house is located on the east property line. The new structure will be located within the setbacks established for the zoning district. Applicants intend to retain the two car garage and lean to storage building that is located on the property. Additional structure has been requested for living space due to the high water table in the area that prevents the lot from accommodating a basement. A. B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission has the following alternatives to consider. To recommend approval of the application as submitted based the applicant's Statement of Hardship. To reconunend denial of the tq)plication based on structural coverage exceeding the 1,500 s.f. allowed for new construction. C. To amend the application. Staff recommends alternative A to approve the application based on the Planning Commission recommendation. The Planning Commission may want to consider the location of North Shore _ Drive as a hardship. The platted County right-of-way is not considered part of the lot; secondly, the lot has a high water table that prevents the lot from accommodating a basement. The applicants have stated in their Statement of Hardship the high water table limits the amount of living space available to them. f^2468 Bmct and Betsy Sushaum 3480 North Shore Drive Variances 4/19/99 Page S Attachments A B C D E F G H I J K Application Description of Request and Statement of Hardship Site Plan/Survey Plat Map Location Map Site Topography Hardcover Worksheets Elevation Views Floor Plans Property Owners List Permit Record / §2468 Bruc€ and B€tsy Sushaum 3480 North Short Drtvi Variances 4/19/99 Page 6 A • • .T ‘w * •\ *•/ '• V f • CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION .Initial Application Fee $250.00 .($50.00 per each additional variance) - Renewal Variance Fee. $150.00-.. (no change from original application) * Variance for non-confom^g structures' $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Application # h ^ Date Received 2- \1- ? ? _ Amount Paid. ..*^2S0^ . A \'ow • PROPERTY INFORMATION RiteAddress'3*IBO -----------------!----------------------— Property Identification Number n>.T.D.’l 08— 11 ^ ~ —Mr*3 QQiZi-----------— ------- Attach legal description to application if not included bn required survey. . IV,..P.«,^ Acquired MKv , 19^1 _____________________^Cmonth^ear) ‘ aqaceiI (do)^^no^^also owntheigaefentparcels of land^ PresentuseoTproperty: "X residential -Other(q>ecify).et^: Zoning District: Lj\ " ! AFVUCAm LS /C^ apf tcan T jt ■, l Phone fhome’l^/2''^7/*^^S~^ Phonehvoik)^ 7)rfUC ----------Zip: 7 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name __________^________ Phone (home). Phone (wbrk)_C V Address:City:._ Zip:. DESCRffTION OF ^QI^ST ^•• (attach additional sheets .if necessary) • • •. VARIANCES REQUB^D Lot Area • ^ Lot Viidth •y Hardcover Lot Coverage f Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakediore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPtlON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDmONS Describe undue har^hip or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions proven g compliance with Zoning Code requirements:. (attach additional sheets if necessary) ♦ 7 Monday February 22,1999 First Draft To: Paul E. Weinberger Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Orono received f EB 2 2 1999 Qi't VJr- ORONO Paul, We have put together some of our thoughts on the plans we submitted to you last Wednesday, and would like you to look them over and share them with the staff. We would like to here back as soon as possible as to what the general feeling is toward this project. We very much appreciate your time and effort in this matter. The following is a list of hardships we would like you to consider for the approval of our revised building plans. 1) We have complied with city setbacks which will have far less variance deficiencies than the existing structure. 2) The existing foundation is not sufficient for a remodeling/addition project 3) Because of the water table on the site, we are unable to have a basement figured into the overall square footage of livable space, meaning a potential loss of 33% of such space for storage, etc. 4) The size of the house is not out of character for Balder Park Extension which is comprised of mostly 50 foot wide lots. 5) The current zoning laws do not include 50 foot lots, which puts us in total rwn- conformance. Zoning of said lots needs to be revised to bring them current with the times. 6) Over the last 5 years we have incurred substantial hardship due to the cities misgrading of Birch Lane. This is a water drainage problem which we have discussed with both the previous city engineer and the present engineer. We feel to mitigate, the city needs to: a) correct this problem b) allow building plans Bruce and Betsy Nusbaum 3480 North Shore Drive cciGabbriel Jabbour, Mayor :nt \ \/\\\\vrv^x\\\V^ ' ' '>\\\\\\\\W ' \ ' V ' \ i\ \ \ V ' \ / EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT TOTAL AREA BEIWECN 7S‘ SETBACK UNE AND 2SO’ SETBACK UNE: 8790 SF (MOT MOJUOIN6 NMIN SHORE t TOTAL ALLOWABLE HARDCOVER M 7S‘-2S0* ZONE: 2SX X 8790 - |16fl7.9 SF| • m-• mm TOTAL HARDCOVER ARD^ IN 75*-2M* 2^ ROOF CONCRETE SURFACE STEPS h LANDING GARAGE 16S0 sf 1S3 tl 147 tf 401 tf L2405 sf I .. , \ km SU35 Y m 2f5 y cn-iii \ \ \ \ K I CUM \ .S 4** t- ?« i iO MIShSv! ^CHRSTtNCOII 2*'^ 400 rv.;>r --A 3 WAnUTOWM - ^TjlOO toii£jtsn f/otl! ^SS®' ------ ^ ••••••••••»••••••••• Df RO Siir- 5 ^SPJ »'to* gRlNQ V- ■*■ v'l ••■.••->. V- •• ^ • % # • #. H *1 * * L vi" * *• ••V XI ^ • • .ir • ^ W * { S. * i* ^ .i : ^ -V 2^'*• V •/: ,*f •— . •• Spring d^.l <MINNETONI kw .. %• •, ^-•*4r^BI^CH'Kr-iLafayet • • •• HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET riRCLEONE) ^0-75*2)75-250’250-500’ rVICTING HAPnrnVER IN ZONE A. House _____________ 500-10 I «Xz S.F. Length Width X X B. Cenge C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B ___X 100 j>RfSPOSED H/iRPr^pyP** ZONE A. House __ * Length Width X X X B. Garage c. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B _ _ xlOO - S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.. S.F. S.F. S.F. % MAu S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. CD S.F. S.F. S.F. 5. ?. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. •S.F. " S.F. “ % A B r HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET G SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-7S* "5" of 3250-500'500- ryiCTlNC HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______________ Avvreas. Aso+o Cos^ Po\^ Varies yne.^_s.F. Length WU!Ji X X X B. Cange C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patlo/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B ____X too ppOPnSgP HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Pado/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X |g.QO 2965 G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ♦ B _____X 100 - S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SI. SI. SI. S.F. S.F. S.F. SI. A S.F. B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. A “ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. i SI. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. "S.F. % A B HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZOPiE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’75-250’ y YISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______________ Lcofth Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D, Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B X too yp^p.-Ki-n HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House--------------------- Lengu. X X Width X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Dcck X X F. Laiukcape Underlain By Plastic X X X 500-1000’ 4"7 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ♦ B ____X 100 - S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ST. ST. . — r' S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ST. S.F.•4. ST. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. •S.F. ■ S.F. ■ % A B • «■ ./ h n'i %J^ -i WEST ELEVATION 1/^” = r-0" ttfUHUltiiUail uattB m m. ^ w '-^'rJ Ul %a*,'Ljkt EAST ELEVATION l/^‘ = r-0" 1 NORTH ELEVATION 1 / a” - 1 ’_n” I - I . 1 I _ ' s ’ /• Jr V,/} (i'j U:»^S'^ *\n O'* SOUTH ELEVATION l/tf“ = I’-O" J \ •’•I RRST FLOOR PLAN * •• ,*/. #1 I of 2, 9 . S 0$in • * V- V *V*5=:y' /Ar^‘ 71' U C"- irrt-'J _*• • SECOND FLOOR PLAN FZ . **\ *.. N • i ^ • / I , RUN DATE 0S/11/9S DATCN 514 HEMIEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY QMNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI4SS401 PAGE 9 PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOk PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR S8 0S-117-2S 43 0001 03470 BIRCH LA f N BERNARD A L K BERNARD THOMAS N BERNARD 3470 BXRCN LA NAYZATA NN 5S39I 38 08-117>23 43 0002 03490 BIRCH U E LXLJEQUXST 8 S LXLJEQUXST ERIC J 0 SHELLY R LXLJEQUXST 3490 BIRCH U NAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0003 01448 BALOUR PARK RD J H 8 N R UNRENCE JAY H 8 HARLXS R UNRENCE 1448 BALDUR PARK RD NAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0008 03510 NORTH SHORE DR D 8 J SIKKA DALJIT 8 JASNXNDER SIKKA 3510 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0012 03470 NORTH SHORE DR HAROLD J BROUELLETTE HAROLD J BROUELLETTE 3470 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0013 03480 NORTH SHORE DR BRUCE A NUSBAUN BRUCE A NUSBAUN 3480 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0014 03490 NORTH SHORE DR KENTON H CARLSON ETAL KENTON H CARUON 3498 NORTH SHORE DRIVE NAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0015 03498 NORTH SHORE OR K 8 D CARUON KENTON H CARLSON 3498 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0023 03450 BIRCH U E R ENOLER'8 B EN6LER EDNARO R 8 BONNIE ENOLER 3450 BIRCH U NAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0024 03448 NORTH SHORE DR JON ERLER JANES 8 NARY ERLER 3448 NORTH SHORE OR NAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0025 03458 NORTH SHORE DR A K EVANS INK EVANS ANY K 8 NAOhl K EVANS . 3458 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0028 03480 NORTH SHORE.DR RONALD TRUMAN CLOUD RONALD TRUMAN. CLOUD 3480 NORTH SHORE DR NAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0027 03480 BIRCH LA D S 8 D K INGVALSOH DOUGLAS 8 DEBORAH TN6VALS0N 3480 BIRCH LA NAYZATA NN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0028 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEHED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 88 CRYSTAL BAY HN TOTAL BATCH 504 00014 55323 i1 M PERMIT RECORD Permit *No Date S'!?^ -(9£> Type of Permit Uik_ _ ?3gj ^lf)S.9>'j^-f?S l^oo&u.ja r^yytjO-^ /03 V.^6-/J. i * » TO;Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator DATE:April 7,1999 SUBJECT:#2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road Variances —Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area:31,760 sq. ft. (.729 acres) Exhibits: AX BX cx Elevitioiu4/6r99 Revised survey Hirdcover worksheets Stiff Report from March 15,1999 meeting with exhibits: A Waiver Form B Elevations C Notice to applicant D Revised survey E Hardcover worksheets Previous Staff Report from February: A Application Plat map Property Owner's list Existing survey Proposed survey Hardcover worl^heets Elevations Roor Plan PC Minutes from 5/18/98 PC Minutes from 6/15/98 PC Minutes from 7/20/98 CC Minutes from 7/27/98 CC Minutes from 8/10/98 Resolution 84143 B B2 C D E F F2&3 G H I J K L Application: This application was reviewed at the February and March 1999 Planning Commission meetings. The Planning Commission suggested that the applicants redesign their proposal to limit structural #245 7 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-4/7/99 page-l coverage to 15% and reduce hardcover. The applicants are proposing to remove the existing residence to construct a new residence. The property is on a peninsula and has two lakeshore setback areas. A variance to allow a driveway in the south 75' will be required for access to the zoning lot A variance to build a new house in the 75'- 250' setback is requested to allow 4,556 sq. ft. (30%) hardcover where 3,797.5 sq. ft (25%) is allowed. The plan presented in February requested 5,080 sq. ft. (33.44%) hardcover in the 75'-250' setback. The March plan reduced hardcover from 33.44% to 32.33%, or a reduction of 170 sq. ft. The April plan reduces hardcover to 4,556 sq. ft. in the 75'-250' setback which is 30% where 25% is allowed. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.22, Subd. 1 and 2. Section 10.55, Subd. 8 Section 10.56, Subd. 16(J) and 16(L) Section 10.03, Subd. 19 Section 10.25, Subd. 6 ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IC District Standards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside Yard 1/2 acre 100'30'10'75'andALS* * Average Lakeshore Setback Subject Property Lot Area and Yards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside U2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Batdur Park Road PC-4/7/99 page-2 • 31,760 sq. ft.97.5' at 75' proposed to ir to garage;>75'; porch may (.72 acres)shoreline; 113'garage 15' required for encroach in the at 75' setback garage over 750 sq. ft. ALS The lot meets the lot area requirements and the lot width requirement because it meets the 80% lot width requirement. The proposed plan meets the lakeshore, side, street, and average lakeshore requirements. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Allowed (15%) Proposed Structural Coverage Proposed Percentage 31,760 sq. ft.4,764 sq. ft.House=1,989 Porch=l,416 Overhangs=206 Total =3,611 sq. ft. 11.36% The revised plan reduces the structural lot coverage from 12.17% to 11.36%. Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0 ’-75’ (NORTH) 7,830 sq. ft.686 sq. ft. (8.76%) NONE NONE NONE 75'-250'15,190 sq. ft.4,420 sq. ft. (29.10%) 3,797.5 (25%) 4,556 sq. ft. (30%) 758.5 sq. ft. (5%) 0'-75' (SOUTH)* 8,740 sq. ft.3,346 sq. ft. (38.28%) NONE 1,050 sq. It. (8.7%) 1,050 sq.ft. (8.7%) The applicants are proposing to remove hardcover in the northerly 0'-75' section of the lot where no hardcover is allowed. The plan would remove the existing hardcover in the 75-250’ setback and replace it with new construction which would require a variance to allow 30% where 25% is allowed. The plan proposes 1,808 sq. ft. more hardcover than the maximum allowed by the ordinance. This lot, however, has two 0'-75' setbacks and a minimum amount of hardcover is needed U2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-4/7/99 page-3 in the southerly section to provide a driveway. The proposed driveway requires 1,0 jO sq. ft. of area in the southerly 0-75' setback. Each variance application must be reviewed separately as a unique application. The applicant needs to demonstrate that there is a fundamental reason why the City should depart from the Code requirements for hardcover. The need for a hardcover variance in the 75'-250' setback is a design issue and is not due to any uniqueness of the lot. Hardcover could be reduced through redesign to 25%, which would result in a smaller footprint. STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant has indicated that the hardship is having two 0’-75* setbacks. Having lake views on each side, however, is an amenity. It also does not impact the size of the residence because there is 15,190 sq. ft. of lot area in the 75'-250' area to build a house and a garage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION A hardcover variance is appropriate for a reasonable driveway in the 0’-75' setback on the south. There is no hardship for the amount of proposed hardcover in the 75'-250’ setback. A house, garage, with a driveway that does not exceed 3,797.5 sq. ft. could be constructed on this site. Economic consideration and design preferences are not considered hardship under state law. if2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1 392 Baldur Park Road PC-4/7/99 page~4 C I i sW’^' i ., ... ><{|'VV 'll.* «. ^ «.# # • ,‘r^ xV.« ^ .v»><*’.^ ^ir.*«•”'.••r ;^-*f dJr^ 4?*^ ^4^*^ :5!WBa:jS«a 3ciay -I—It~J __>!; -JU -rirrr:'“ir'*: iiUrft^VAir 0(H.‘ Wa<l V {V n SliU PROMT ELEVATION ’ §CMM> W4* • r.#^ I_PPT gLEVATION ftc^f. wr • r.«^ ■ ViTi-:o iptBRI aiTui »1(| ^ IMLt L: gIgtMT gLEVATION •CALli M* • r*#* RPAR ELEVATION > VTAI r !/•* • UMVIU OC rMULA LIINUDC.r^'J OF LOTS 17 AND 18, BLOCK BALDUR PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA ■ '/ / / tKij- HARDCQVl^ CALCULATION WORKSHEET LCLEONEIi ('0-75*^ 75-250’ 250-500' ^ei/. Z-/6 '?? EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOut H PART A. House X cs V-5--95. Length . -r • ^ Width g.S.F.(2k X s S.F. X =S.F.- B. Garage x C5 S.F. - mrnm • • ••• •• •• • _ . C. Driveway. ... x ts -S.F.• X m S.F. D. Sidewalk x SB S.F. X r=S.F. • • E. Palio/Deck x S.F. %s S.F. F. Landscape i ss S.F. Underlain x ZLi S.F. By Plastic x =S.F. Or Fabric • • G. Other x BS S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F.A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE -S.F.B. A ........ -i- B xlOO % PROPOSED I^RDCOVER IN ZONE * A. House X • S.F.- — ____ . * Mng* ....................Width • a .. • _ . . _ X m S.F.• X ss S.F. X cs S.F. B. Garage x xs S.F. • • C. Driveway x a /iZSO S.F. X a S.F. D. Siaewalk x a S.F. • =S.F. E. Patio/Deck x a S.F.. • ---------------- - . X a •S.F. F. Landscape x a S.F. Underlain x «=S.F. By Plastic x a S.F.• Or Fabric ' ' • 0. Other • x a S.F. ......................... TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F..A ’ total PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE .^7*/o SF.B . A /OSO + B X100 »/2. O/% /Ai<K Aoa/) ^LACkra** f/ /a^ 13 i j HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House 0-75' X Length X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G, Other . ■ ■ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A __ _ _ -f B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE' A House 0iA4gg x Length /^/A(^4Acrf 2 t 7 X X B. Garage to'* > • • • a» • C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Filial X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREa RI ZONE A yjrjT g B • • • (75-2S03 2S0-S00' Width X 100 Width 500-1000'^^^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. xlOO S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 13 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. % /? 75 S.F. /9 SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. 770 SF &F. /SO S.F. S.F. /yi^/ S.F. 20 6 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Vss6 S.F. /S* t90 SF. 90. ‘n % A B A B HARDCOVEJ8XALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0^7^ 75-250’ 250-500’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE Al, Mouse y s Length X X X ----B»- Garage - C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck *X X • ♦ F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A __ _ _ + B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE' A.. House. . ^_______■ . X Length X X X B. -Oarage _ C. Dtiveway * 'X X D. Sidewalk X X £. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G Other TOTAL HARDCOV ER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _B • a •• • • Width s s a 8 X 100 Width 8 a a 2-/^-9 9 500-1000'/ft/ J -2-99 ___^7'- ^7 ^3 o X100 7^30 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. .. A S.F. B % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. SF. SF. S.F. A S.F. B % DK CITY OF ORONO ZONING FILE #2457 P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 249-4600 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: March 16,1999 TO: Paula & David Lindberg 3440 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES TO: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: 3/15/99 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Need to revise hardcover in the 75-250' setback to 30%. Keep structural coverage to 15% or less. Please provide staff with revised plan, reduced plan copies, elevations, and hardcover worksheets. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the Planning Commission meeting is April 5, 1999 for the April 19 meeting. If yon desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available fi’om the City Recorder after review and approvjd by the Planning Commissioii. 4 X;VAPPSWPWIN60\\VPDOCS.CAROLE\PCACTlON'^457-2 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16.1999 £X (it9) H24$4 QREQ AND MARCIA BARNUM, 160 MCCULLEY ROAD, AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMTT- Continued White moved, McMillan seconded, a motion to approve Application #2454 for Greg and Marcia Bamum, 160 McCulley Road, for an after-the-fSact conditional use permit for land alternation subject to: . e ^ • **** •••• 1. Review of the sepdc sites to ensure that they were riot disturbed. 2. Determine an end date for the stock pile. 3. Change the address to a number on Bayside Road (4760). 4. Applicant to obtain a land alteration permit There should not be a double fee for the application. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#7) #2456 ROGER AND KRISTINE 8TRAUMAN, 123 CHEVY CHASE DRIVE, VARIANCE. 7:48 p.m. - 7:60 p.m. ♦ Roger and Kristine Strauman were present. Van Zomeren presented the staff report She said the applicants are requesting a lot area variance to remove the existing residence and construct a new residence. The lot is appro)dmately one>half acre. Staff recommends approval of the lot area variance. Roger Strauman said he has talked to the neighbors and they do not object to the proposal. There were no public comments. White moved, McMillan seconded, a motion to approve Application #2465, Roger and Kristine Strauman, 123 Chevy Chase Drive, for a lot area variance. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#8) #2457 DAVID AND PAULA UNDBERG, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD, VARIANCES, 7:61 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. David and Paula LIndberg were present. Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She said the applicants propose to tear down the existing house and coristruct a new house and garage. The surveyor has submitted a revised site plan that would eliminate some the variances. One of the co icems that staff had is that the driveway was not sized to allow for an adequate back out area. The surveyor did redraw the driveway to provide the applicant with a better backing out area. All of the structural hardcover is located in the 75-250’ setback. Van Zomeren displayed the elevations for the proposed residence. The proposed residence Is different that the O'Keefe proposal. The lot has the 0’-75* setback requirement on two sides. In this plan, the garage Is detached and located closer to the street and more of the hardcover is put into structure rather than driveway. Structural coverage on this proposal Is 4,804 square feet or 15.12%. The variances that this application would need are for hardcover in the 0’-75 ’ setback for the driveway, and hardcover in the 75 ’-250’ setback. Grading for the driveway would require a conditional use permit because it is within five feet of the property line. She also recommend^ that the conditional use permit language reflect that the topography be restored where the foundation Is removed. The applicants had no comments. Pages r * § % ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (#6) #2454 OREO AND MARCIA BARNUM, 150 MCCULLEY ROAD. AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:39 p.m. - 7:47 p.m. Marcia Bamum was present. Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She said the property has 179* on Bayside Road and the length of the lot follows McCulley Road. When the property was platted, the address of iSO McCulley Road was assigned; however, the front of the lot Is the narrow end on Bayside and one of the issues to be addressed is whether or not to recommend that the address be changed. Van Zomeren said the applicant contacted Hennepin County and obtained a driveway access permit from Hennepin County. As the driveway was being installed, they discovered debris buried on the property. A land alteration permit is required because more than 500 cubic yards was disturbed. The City Engineer, Tom Kellogg, reviewed the plans. He questioned the purpose of the stockpile of dirt and he wanted to ensure that the septic sites were not disturbed. Van Zomeren said staff does not believe that the septic sites have been damaged or disturbed. Van Zomeren did not receive any public comment except from one neighbor who was concerned about the distance of the driveway located from the intersection. Access from McCulley Road is not feasible to achieve an 8% slope or less for the driveway. Sandy from Diversified Const, said the stockpile of dirt will be used for fill around the house. Mabusth asked when the applicant plans to get the building permit for the new residence. Sandy said they applied for the building permit and it will be issued after this matter is settled. Mabusth asked If the applicant would have a problem with the Bayside address. Bamum said It would not be a problem. The entrance from Bayside is much more gradual than from McCulley. There were no public comments. McMillan said the driveway entrance from Bayside would be a much bette*' nption than McCulley. She said the applicant should not have to pay after-the-fact fees for this application. Van Zomeren said that the conditional use permit Is needed because as the project progressed, more than 500 cubic yards of dirt was moved around. It is not known how much dirt would have been moved around for the driveway If conditions had been typical. The existing conditions on the site that were unknown led to the problem of the amount of soil that was being moved. David Dunn, a neighbor, said he feels another driveway on Bayside creates an additional traffic hazard. He asked if there could be additional signage fora hidden driveway. Mabusth said Bayside Is a county road and Mr. Dunn should contact the County Highway Department regarding signage. Page 7 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (Its) #2457 DAVID AND PAULA UNDBERO, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD, VARIANCES - ConUnuQd Julie and Mark VerSteege, neighbors to the north, said they want to make sure the runoff slays on the applicant’s property, and does not drain Into their basement. Mabusth asked if the applicants have submitted a grading plan. * • • • ^ • * Van Zomeren said the plan was submitted to Tom Kellogg, the City Engineer. He said to make sure silt control fences are used. The City Engineer's first review did not flag any rhajor concerns. Mabusth asked if the sun/eyor has confirmed that there is no average iakeshore setback problem. Van Zomeren said yes. Hawn asked if the applicants have looked at reducing the structural coverage by 40 square feet. David Undberg said tfiey are willing to reduce the structural coverage. McMillan questioned the detached garage. Undberg said an attached garage would require a larger driveway and additional grading. McMillan suggested repositioning the garage In order to reduce the slope and Improve safety. Mabusth questioned why the O'Keefe application was so much lower In hardcover In the 75 ’-250 ‘ setback. Undberg said the O'Keefe's had more driveway and a smaller garage. Mabusth asked how the other commission members felt about the hardcover In the 75 ’-250 ’ setback. Hawn said this is a difficult site. She would like to see the structural coverage reduced by 40 square feet. Mabusth asked staff to review the variances that would be needed with the current plan. Van Zomeren said they would need a variance for the 0’-75 ’ setback on the south side, a variance In the 75'-250' setback to allow 33% where 25% Is allowed, a conditional use permit for grading within five feet of the property line and restoration of the topography. McMillan asked about the O'Keefe’s plan and what the amount of hardcover was In the 75 ’-250 ’. Van Zomeren said it was 5.725 square feet. Mabusth asked if the garage design would match the house. Undberg said the garage would match the house. Mabusth said the Commission would have a problem approving 33% hardcover In the 75 ’-250 ’ setback. She asked about the hardcover that would result from the porches. Van Zomeren reviewed the square footage of the hardcover. She said they would need to reduce 1.000 square feet to meet ttie 25% requirement. Pages ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 __________ L/NDBE/IG, 1992 BALDUR park road , VARIANCES Hawn recommended that the applicants reduce the size of the porches. Mabusth suggested that the applicants work with staff to reduce the amount of hardcover. rfrwlI^C In the 0*-75* Is a necessity. She wants to make sure the appl^^on Inclined to approve something similar to the O’Keefe -equipments. She recommended th^ te doM to 30%"** ****^ structural coverage and reduce hardcover so vJfJi *l®*l9n of the garage and driveway approach. She does not haidMver ® ^ *^®*® !>®'’^cover In the driveway and reduce safety in order to add more building tfie^drivew^^ nsl^ed If H would adversely affect their application to make a more gradual slope for ®^® driveway as a hardship because she does not want them to have anuns8T6 dfivGWdy. Matx^ recommended they have their final grading plan ready when the application comes before me Planning Commission again. Hawn asked if the applicants need to give their permission to extend the 60-day time limit eS! ^**12®!?.” ®*®^ *1*® applicants a letter regarding extending the 60-day time limit, snej^med to make It clear that It is difficult for staff to advise applicants on the square footage that might be approved because every variance is different Havm moved, McMillan seconded, a motion to table Application #2457,1392 Baldur Park Road, for variances and a conditional use permit until March 16,1999. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Recess, 8:30 p.m. - 8:35 p.m. '^'^YZATA country club , 200 WAYZATA BLVD. W., CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT. 8:35 p.m. - 8:60 p.m. Louis Oberhauser was present. Weinberger presented the staff report. He said the Wayzata Country Club has recently developed a *^® ®”**'^® 0®*^ course. As part of the master plan, the Wayzata Country Club applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit for reconstruction, relocation or addition of tees for each of noies #1-18 and reconstruction, relocation and addition of bunkers along fairways and around most w the greens. The third phase of the project is the expansion of three pond areas on the property. The Cfty approved a conditional use permit to complete the work on the tee boxes and bunkers Page 10 TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE; Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator ^T5tJmafy;9,1999 SUBJECT;#2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road Variances —Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area:31,760 sq. ft. (.729 acres) Exhibits: A B C D E Waiver Form Elevations Notice to applicant Revised survey Hardcover worksheets Previous Staff Report from February: A Application Plat map Property Owner's list Existing survey Proposed survey Hardcover worksheets Elevations F2&3 Floor Plan G PC Minutes from 5/18/98 PC Minutes from 6/15/98 PC Minutes from 7/20/98 CC Minutes from 7/27/98 CC Minutes from 8/10/98 Resolution #4143 B B2 C D E F H 1 J K L U2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-3/I5/99 page~l Application: This application was reviewed at the February 1999 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission suggested that the applicants redesign their proposal to limit structural coverage to 15% and reduce hardcover. The applicants are proposing to remove the existing residence to construct a new residence. The property is on a peninsula and has two lakeshore setback areas. A variance to allow a driveway in the south 75' will be required for access to the zoning lot. A variance to build a new house in the 75'- 250' setback is requested to allow 4,910 sq. ft. (32.33%) hardcover where 3,797.5 sq. ft. is allowed. The plan presented in February requested 5,080 sq. ft. (33.44%) hardcover in the 75'-250' setback. The new plan reduces hardcover from 33.44% to 32.33%, or a reduction of 170 sq. ft. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.22, Subd. 1 and 2. Section 10.55, Subd. 8 Section 10.56, Subd. 16(J) and 16(L) Section 10.03, Subd. 19 Section 10.25, Subd. 6 ii U2457 David and Paula Lindberg /39'2 Baldur Park Road PC-3/15/99 page-2 ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IC District Standards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside Yard 1/2 acre 100'30'10'IS' and ALS* * Average Lakeshore Setback Subject Property Lot Area and Yards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside 31,760 sq. ft. (.72 acres) 97.5' at shoreline; 113' at 75' setback IS' proposed to garage IT to garage; 15' required for garage over 750 sq. ft. >75'; porch may encroach in the ALS The lot meets the lot area requirements and the lot width requirement because it meets the 80% lot width requirement. The proposed plan meets the lakeshore, side, street, and average lakeshore requirements. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Allowed (15%) Proposed Structural Coverage Proposed Percentage 31,760 sq. ft.4,764 sq. ft.House=2,446 Porch= 1,407 Overhangs=187 Total =4,040 sq. ft. 12.17% The revised plan reduces the structural lot coverage from 15.12% to 12.17% by replacing the detached garage with a 3 car attached garage. ii245 7 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-3/I5/99 page~3 Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0'-75' (NORTH) 7,830 sq. ft.686 sq. ft. (8.76%) NONE NONE NONE 75*-250'15,190 sq. ft.4,420 sq. ft. (29.10%) 3,797.5 (25%) 4,910 sq. ft. (32.32%) 1,112.5 sq. ft. (7.32%) 0 ’-75' (SOUTH)' 8,740 sq. ft.3,346 sq. ft. (38.28%) NONE 900 sq. ft. (10.30%) Driveway 900 sq. ft. (10.30%). 31,760 sq. ft.8,452 sq. ft. (26.6% of total lot area) 3,797.5 sq. ft. (25%) 5,810 sq. ft. (18% of total lot area) 2,012.5 (6.33%) The ^plicants are proposing to remove hardcover in the northerly 0'-75' section of the lot where no hardcover is allowed. The plan would remove the existing hardcover in the 75'-250' setback and replace it with new construction which would require a variance to allow 32.32% where 25% is allowed. The plan proposes 2,012.5 sq. ft. more hardcover than the maximum allowed by the ordinance. This lot, however, has two 0'-75' setbacks and a minimum amount of hardcover is needed in the southerly section to provide a driveway. The proposed driveway requires 900 sq. ft. of area in the 0'-75' setback.. The previous resolution #4143 for Gary O'Keefe granted a variance to allow a 2,440 sq. ft. house with an attached garage (680 sq. ft.) with stoops, walks and patios (360 sq. ft.), 'fhe driveway was proposed at 2,245 sq. ft. The previous plan was for a rambler with a two car attached garage. • Resolution #4143 Revised Plan 3/99 House 2,440 sq. ft.4,040 sq. ft. Garage 680 sq. ft. Stoops, walks, patios 360 sq. ft.60 sq. ft. Driveway 2,245 sq.ft.1,710 sq. ft. Total 5,725 sq. ft.5,810 sq.ft. it2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-3/13/99 page-4 Each variance application must be reviewed separately as a unique application. The applicant needs to demonstrate that there is a fundamental reason why the City should depart from tlie Code requirements for hardcover. The need for a hardcover variance in the 75 -250 setback is a design issue and b not due to any uniqueness of the lot. Hardcover could be reduced through redesign to 25%. STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant has indicated that the hardship is having two 0’-75' setbacks. Having lake views on each side, however, is an amenity. It also does not impact the size of the residence because there is 15,190 sq. ft. of lot area in the 75'-250' area to build a house and a garage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION A hardcover variance is appropriate for a reasonable driveway in the 0'-75' setback on the south. There is no hardship for the amount of proposed hardcover in the 75'-250 setback. A house, garage, with a driveway that does not exceed 3,797.5 sq. ft. could be constructed on this site. Economic consideration and design preferences are not considered hardship under state law. H2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-3/15/99 page-5 Febniaiy 17,1999 A WAIVER FORM David and Paula Lindberg 3440 North Shore Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Re: #2457 1392 Baldur Park Road I am requesting continuation of the review of my application for conditional use permit and variance. I release and waive any of the City’s obligations to proceed and conclude review of my application in a timely manner which includes any statuatory obligation for timely review. avid Lindberg / jiMsi Dite * RUN DATE 01/12/99 BATCH 502 PROP ADDR OirSER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 58 08-117-23 31 0001 01900 BALDUR PARK RD CHARLES 8 REID CHARLES 8 REID 1900 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 31 0009 01389 BALDUR PARK RD H D I J A VERSTEEG HARK D VERSTEEG 1389 P-IDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 31 0007 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED WILLIAH J H FRANKLIN WILLIAH franklin 1730 NEW BRIGHTON DLVD HPLS HN 55913 38 08-117-23 39 0031 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED REGINALD A SPINDLER R A SPINDLER SPRING FARH 8902 BURROUGHS RD W DEER PARK WA 99006 38 08-117-23 39 0039 00^38 ADDRESS UNASSICNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL B;.Y HN 55323 38 08-117-23 31 0002 01396 BALDUR PARK RD R J t H A WETT TRUSTEES RICHARD S HAROE WETT 1396 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 31 0005 01376 BALDUR PARK.RD J WANG 8 D L B0THWELL-WAN6 J WANG I D L BOTHWELL-WANG 1376 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 39 0017 01908 BALDUR PARK RD WILLIAH L/KRI5TI B ANDERSON WILLIAH L/KRISTI B ANDERSON 1908 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 39 0032 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED REGINALD A SPINDLER R A SPINDLER SPRING FARH 8902 BURROUGHS RD W DEER PARK WA 99006 TOTAL BATCH 502 00013 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 5 38 08-117-23 31 0003 01392 BALDUR PARK RD G W O’KEEFE 8 L H O’KEEFE 0 W O’KEEFE 8 L H O’KEEFE 1392 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 31 0006 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED WILLIAH J H FRANKLIN WILLIAH FRANKLIN 1730 NEW BRIGHTON BLVD HPLS HN 55913 38 08-117-23 39 0018 01909 BALDUR PARK RD CHARLES AFFIAS CHARLES AFFIAS 2639 JERSEY AVE S ST LOUIS PARK HN 55926 38 08-117-23 39 0033 00038 ADDRESS UHASSIGNED HAROLD R KITCHEN HAROLD KITCHEN BOX 918 NISSWA HN 56968 • ✓ / / • I/f%., . .. •• -- % . f A J RUN DATE 01/12/99 BATCH 502 ^ X 01 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST ■fbp. Ni>h ■ ©Ric:^ feohvti^ rtWNiivSDn Cl■s^ (!> 0\cwu* voavpol^ Uo (as (i«) C5)>^ («4lto OW<J' Pwt EJ H 6^3^^ I REPORT NO. P1935901 PAGE 6 . f I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DAT Cr • ^ _ ]'i?rlW ,v Th ■^(X'iaMisFF m f CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #2457 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: February 17,1999 TO: David and Paula Lindberg 3440 North Shore Drive Orono,MN 55391 COPIES TO: TTiTE OF APPLICATION:Variance/Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: 2/16/99 VOTE:4 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1 . Need to reduce hardcover in 75-250' setback. 2. Need to meet 15% structural lot coverage requirement. 3. Grading plan for conditional use permit. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the March 15 1999 meeting is February 26, 1999. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. X;\APPS\WPWIN60\WPDOCS'CAROLE\PCACnOK\2437 HARDCOVpXALCULATION WrKSHEET SETB^^KZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ^-75^ -------- EXISTING HARDCOVER IN 7.nNT. A. House Y 75-250’250-500 ’ Length X X X B t - Garage - C. Driveway D. Sidewalk >: X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic ^Or Fabric X X X O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total property area in ZONT - B PROPOSED HApprpVER IN 7.0[>nF^ —A.. House %Length X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X • G.^Other X total hardcover in ZO^;E total property AREA IN ZONE ^ ^ B Width 8 a X 100 Width 8 8 a a y^zo xioo r 500-1000’/,^ 73^30 Received 13 i MAR 0 3 1999 CUYUH ORO/VO S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. % SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. SF. S.F. SF S.F. SF. SF. SF. A 6 SF. A SF. ,B % ^/AyOt^^uC /-2o~J9 HARDCOVER CALCULATIOilWORKSHEET 9 9 SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' (73-250^ 250-500' 500-1000’_ oq ... existing hardcover in zone • ^ ' / _ . ^ _______ " S.F. / Length Width ______________ X ____________ = S.F ______________SF S.F. X X *• B. Oarage C. Driveway X X ss 8 D. Sidewalk X X 8 8 >• • • E. Patio/Deck O 4 13 SF. SF. fise:-SF.— ■MTt)s^^J99" eVTY X s f S.F. F. Landscape X 53 ■i S.F. Underlain X 8 S.F. By Plastic X 8 •S.F. Or Fabric • .0; Other .X 8 S.F. .........................TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •SF. A - B X100 ®% ' PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE' A. House if (r iR. A X 8 2yy/r SF. Lenfth Width 0 X S S.F. X •8 S.F. ■ X 8 S.F. B. Garage X 8 • •• S.F. C. Driveway X 55 S /O SF. X 8 S.F. D. Sidewalk X 60S.F. . . ..X 8 S.F. X 8 /907S.F. m/€RHAUC-X 8 S.F. F. Landscape X 8 SF. , Underlain X 8 S.F. * By Plastic X 8 SF. Or Fabric 0. Other X 8 SF. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ^970 S.F. total PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •/J,S.F. A V9/0 - B .X 100 “32. 32 % ■ A B A B %• / *7 •w** HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK-ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0.7s9 75-250* 250-500* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN 7.nr^ jOcfrH A. House _____________X ■» 500-1000* tfu, J-2- Length B. Garage I • • • • • — .. C. Driveway. D. Sidewalk t... E. Paiio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other ^ . X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY A^A .IN ZONE A _______' + B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE ’ A. House • • •«Length B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewulk E. Patio/Deck X X X »» 41^ •% mm* •• • F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric 0. Other X X X X X X X X X X • • TOTAL HARDCOVER FN ZONE u. ... total PROPERTY AREA FN ZONE * A 900 ^ B Width B B SF. SF. S.F.- i X 100 Width \zx B 8 8 ts B B S RECEIVED 1999 oi»T \.»r OHONO ______S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. % A B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. foo SF. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. foa xlOO JP7VQ SF 7n Vo A B W^ i I FVv:vi Si* TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Lijs^y an Zqmeren^ pi^ PI jpner/Zoning Administrator DATE: SUBJECT: February 9,1999 #2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road Variances and Conditional Use Permit-Public Hearing Zoning DU t ?ict: LR>1B Lot Area: One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) 31,760 sq. ft. (.729 acres) Exhibits:A Application B Plat map B2 Property Owner's list C Existing survey D Proposed survey E Hardcover worksheets F Elevations F2&3 Floor Plan G PC Minutes from 5/18/98 H PC Minutes from 6/15/98 I r Minutes from 7/20/98 J CC Minutes from 7/27/98 K CC Minutes from 8/10/98 L Resolution #4143 Application: The applicants are requesting hardcover variances in the south 0'-75* setback and the 75-250' setbacks and a conditional use permit to grade for a driveway in the 0’-75* setback and within 5' of the west property line. The proposed plan also requires a side yard variance for the garage to be located 11' from the property line where 15' is required for a garage that exceeds 750 sq. ft. A variance would also be required to locate the garage closer than 10’ to the principal U2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC--2/16/99 page-1 structure. The proposed plan also shows a portion of the porch possibly being located al\^d of the average l^es]]^ore setback. The surveyor should confirm the average lakeshore setback line. The proposal includes 15.12% structural coverage where 15% is allowed. A structural lot coverage variance is required. A previous application for this property was considered in 1998. The minutes and resolution #4143 regarding that application are attached to this report. The applicants are prospective or new buyers of the property. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.22, Subd. 1 and 2. Section 10.55, Subd. 8 Section 10.56, Subd. 16(J) and 16(L) Sc9tion 10.03, Subd. 19 Section 10.25, Subd. 6 • 3 (H457 David and Paula LIndberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-7/16/99 page-2 ANALYSIS Lot Area *md Yards LR-IC ■^^r' «» .. IV District Standards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside Yard 1/2 acre 100’30’10’, 75’ and ALS* * Average Lakeshore Setback Subject Property Lot Area and Yards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside 31,760 sq^ ft (.72 acres) 97.5’ at shoreline; 113' at 75' setback 75' proposed to garage 1 r to garage; 15'required for garage over 750 sq. ft. >75'; porch may encroach in the ALS The lot meets the lot area requirements and the lot width requirement because it meets the 80% lot width requirement. The proposed plan does not meet the side yard requirement for the garage nor the 10’ separation of structures. It appears a portion of the porch may encroach into the average lakeshore setback. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Allowed (15%) Proposed Structural Coverage Proposed Percentage 31,760 sq. ft.4,764 sq. ft.House=2,126 Porch=l,820 Garage=858 Total =4,804 sq. ft. 15.12% The proposed plan exceeds the allowed structural coverage by 40 sq. ft. A variance is required for this plan. fi2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-2/16/99 page-3 Hardcover Distance from Shoreline 0'-75' (NORTH) 75 ’-250 ’ 0’-75' (SOUTH)’ Total Area Setback 7,830 sq. ft 15,190 sq. ft. 8,740 sq. ft 31,760 sq. ft. Existing ^HardcoWr 686 sq. ft. (8.76%) 4,420 sq. ft. (29.10%) 3,346 sq. ft. (38.28%) 8,452 sq. ft. (26.6% of total lot area) Allowed Hardcover NONE 3,797.5 sq.ft. (25%) NONE 3,797.5 sq. ft. (25%) Proposed Hardcover NONE 5,080 sq. ft. (33.44%) 640 sq. ft (7.32%) Driveway 5,720 sq. ft. (18% of total lot area) Variance Requested NONE 1,282.5 sq.ft. (8.44%) 640 sq. ft. (7.32%) +1,922.5 sq. ft. The applicants are proposing to remove hardcover in the northerly 0'-75' section of the lot where no hardcover is allowed. The plan would remove the existing hardcover in the 75'-250' setback and replace it with new construction which would require a variance to allow 33.44% where 25% is allowed. The plan proposed 1,922.5 sq. ft. more hardcover than the maximum allowed by the ordinance. This lot, however, has two 0'-75’ setbacks and a minimum amount of hardcover is needed in the southerly section to provide a driveway. Staff does not believe that the driveway is adequate to provide parking in front of the garage. The previous resolution #4143 granted a variance to allow a 2,440 sq. ft. house with an attached garage (680 sq. ft.) with stoops, walks and patios (360 sq. ft.). The driveway was proposed at 2,245 sq. ft. H2457 David and Paula L Indberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC^2/l6/99 page-‘4 * • Resolution #4143 Application House 2,440 sq. ft.3,946 sq. ft.(7nc/Mcfes 1,820 •VV*’«« .. ir sq.ft, for porch) Garage ^ • 680 sq.ft.858 sq. ft. Stoops, walks, patios 360 sq. ft.156 sq. ft. Driveway 2,245 sq.ft.760 sq. ft.fhor enough parking area in front of garage) Total 5,725 sq. ft.5,720 sq. ft. The application proposes less hardcover than the amount of hardcover that was approved in the previous resolution. This application, however, requires more variances for side yard setback for the garage, setback between the accessory and principal structures and a structural lot coverage variance. Staff also does not believe that the driveway was drawn to adequately reflect what is typically needed for a parking area in front of a 3 car garage. Where the previous application required a hardcover variance to allow a longer driveway to match the topography and to allow an attached garage, this application minimizes the non*structural hardcover for a driveway by proposing a detached garage with a narrow parking pad. More hardcover is put into structures—for the larger garage and the porch. The need for a hardcover variance in the 75'-250' setback is a design issue and is not due to any uniqueness of the lot. Hardcover and structural coverage could be reduced through redesign. The planning Commission should also consider the location and size of the detached garage as the garage doors will face the lake and the adjacent property to the west currently may enjoy a view of the lake through this area. The average lakeshore setback does not apply to the street side of this lot even though it is located on the lake. STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant has indicated that the hardship is having two 0-75' setbacks. Having lake views on each side, however, is an amenity. ^2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-2/16/99 page-5 STAFF RECOMMENDATION A hardcover vanaftcc and conditio^ use gpnnit is appropriate for a reasonable driveway in the 0- 75' setback on the south. That does not ju^fy, however, granting a hardcover variance in the 75'- 250' setback where a house and garage with driveway could be constructed with less than 3,797.5 sq. ft of hardcover. No hardship exists to grant variances for side yard setback, structural coverage or to reduce the 10' required distance between the principal and accessory structure. Further, no hardship exists to locate the porch ahead of the average lakeshore setback. Staff recommends that the applicant redesign to reduce variances. A hardcover variance in the southerly 0'-75' setback for a driveway and a conditional use permit to grade would be feasible. • • • • •v» U24S7 David and Paula Lindberg /392 Baldur Park Road PC-2/16/99 page-6 Application # 5'7 Date Receiv^~ / /1 *> / 9 Amount Paid »z cmr OF ORONO -variance application Initial Application Fee $250,00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from ori^al application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION , . Site Address \v <a» ^_________.__TJ ____________A?____•VT______/n T T% \ }Property Identification Number fP.I.D.’l \ ^ooZ A A-A__1 ______1 ___aaa rl/^f inrlnHpH on reniiiTiAttach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date P^erty Acquired ____________________________________ I (do) (^o no^also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) Present use of property: _Xjre®dcii^3l Zoning District: other (specify) I p-/_7~ f'h. acy&i .A')APPLICANT ~) I \ Name jr VntJ<>- LrvJwej — Addressiz^uo joVch.u^'^&ir. ^City:_ OvTgwvg (luWlU 7^ Phone (home) bl2-W‘7i-75^fe Phone (work) . CfiS/ Zio: s<xcti OWNER (if different than applicant) Name (^cxvy n*VCe-gie> A LatJLr:^ — Address:______________________.- City: Phone (homel^(of^3 ^ Phone (work) (^Cg^2)_ Zip:. Estimated Construction Cost $ ^00^006,00DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimateo ^.onsiruCTion v.os ------- Describe request in detail: oVAU di w .Vu.'\<l. ^tvA^ ..ftw (Jfyil ll W^LO QaVM^ “^ ^ I - I—.. rXWl/f AO^ Ac X Hardcover v Lot Coverage $iAe VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: ___Lot Width Front __Side O-TS*) Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSBnp/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical diffi^ or unusual property ronditions OTevenUn^ compliance with Zoning Code rpqnirements:7^r<^ T5 (^c4fr /jt JL o-lS' '2otAe5 ^ Mr^u^r^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) u c% ft J r> VjTj?' fl; .. V• 1' Of-II1 -A3 RUN DATE 01/12/99 BATCH 502 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY mc:*CRTY INf ORHATlOM SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI9S5A01 PAGE 5 38 08-117-23 31 0001 01400 BALDUR PARK RD CHARLES B REID CHARLES B REID 1400 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HM SS391 30 08-117-23 31 0004 01384 BALDUR PARK RD H D I J A VERSTEE6 HARK D VERSTEE6 1384 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HN S5391 38 88-117-23 31 0007 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED WILLZAH J H FRANKLIN WILLIAH FRANKLIN 1730 NEW BRIGHTON BLVO HPLS HN S541S 38 88-117-23 34 0031 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED REGINALD A SPINDLER R A SPINDLER SPRING FARH 8402 BURROUGHS RD W DEER PARK WA 99006 38 08-117-23 34 8834 00030 ADDRESS UNASSICNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN S5323 38 08-117-23 31 0002 01396 BALDUR PARK RD R J t H A WETT TRUSTEES RICHARD 8 HARCE WETT 1396 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HN .£5391 > . 38 08-117-23 31 0003 01392 BALDUR PARK RD C W O’KEEFE 8 L H O'KEEFE 0 W O'KEEFE 8 L H O'KEEFE 1392 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 31 8885 01376 BALDUR PARK;RO J WANG 8 D L B0THHELL-WAN6 J WANG 8 D L BOTHWELL-WANC 1376 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 31 0006 • 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED WILLIAH J H FRANKLIN WILLIAH FRANKLIN 1730 NEW BRIGHTON BLVO HPLS HN 55413 4. 38 08-117-23 34 0017 01408 BALDUR PARK RD WILLIAH L/KRISTI B ANDERSON WILLIAH L/KRISTI B ANDERSON 1408 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0018 01404 BALDUR PARK RD CHARLES AFFIAS CHARLES AFFIAS 2634 JERSEY AVE S ST LOUIS PARK KN 55426 38 08-117-23 34 0832 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED REGINALD A SPINDLER R A SPINDLER SPRING FARH 8402 BURROUGHS RD W DEER PARK WA 99006 38 08-117-23 34 8833 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED HAROLD R KITCHEN HAROLD KITCHEN BOX 418 NISSWA HN 56468 TOTAL BATCH 502 00013 M O A •//» Q /! 7 ^ * •} •JL ^ I J RUN DATE 01/12/49 BATCH 502 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORNATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST Top- N^h- © rtvWhVrvSDn POi'k. U» NSias Ciz\ QhO^ V/JOlv^Ol^ a« REPORT NO. nW^Ol PAGE 4 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORNATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION# TO THE BEST OF NY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF. DAT /'iSjW „ Th ^(^cdhsfF .. • c Wo 8 • • tt • Ik If—t*^MI/ a • • m •• • • •m »# 9 •• ••• wr L.vy I o 1/ r\iNU lu, UL.w^r\ i| urvui^i^i\ rrvrA^ HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA •m»* (M« •• mm »* • •« • • • • • I I M • < t • I • • •* • If ^ « s. LEGAL DESORPTION OF PREMISES: . Lois: 17 ond 18, Block 1, Boidur Pork This survey Intends to show the boundorles of the obove descf ’lbed property* and the location of on existing house, goroge, and o# other visible •'hordcover ” thereon. It does not purport to show ony other Improvements or cncroochments. I • • • o ' : Denotes iron nnorker Bearings shown ore based upon on ossumed datum Detum: Meon seo level 0-75.nr; Z0^ area: 16570+~ S. F. > 75 FT. ZO^tE. AREA: 15190+- S. F. M • m (fj # 0 ffS»i ij it 94 tiff 0 00d4if4 fJ/» # ft ksoeio sevonN DATC • oesesrnoN i 1 DRAWN 8 — CHICKIO rVAA * 01 COFFIN k GRONB^G, INC. lONSaiWO ENCtCERS, UNO SURVEYORS, STTE PtAM€R? 482 TAMARACK AVENUE, lONC LAKE, Mi 55398 812-47>-4t4t ;{ •S •• I I icMsr canrt nur nq rum srccncAnoK on NoraeT WAS ncPANCo av tc OR uocR wr omcct suPCRvaoN am> TMATI Au A oar uxietd nufcsaoMAL cncmor imcr T>C LAWS or ^^€ STAIC Of UMCSOIA. lUTf ?/y, 9 9 im» MW Tf DATE 1/20/99 X« NO. 99015 HARDCOVE^XALCULATION WORKSHEET ”" IxflnSr <351^ 75-250* 250-500’ SOOllOOO*g2a§TING HARPr^VER IN zor^rt j^uTH PAf{T^ - X ___________ - __________ S.F.-»••••• •• •Length Width• •• ; • • •B. Oarage• • • •• •'S';• •• « • •• D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Undcrk:: ByPlasc.: Or Fabric »• *• mm •• • •m •• G. Other • « « • • - • X •• • • ^. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN-ZONE • TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ^53^......... + B xlOO 30.7.© PROPOSED HARDCOVER TN rnfJT * A. House’ ■ Length Width • 9 m • . • B. Garage - • C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck » t •• • •m m F._Landscape ___Upderlaio. . By Plastic Or Fabric 0. Other X S.F. S.F. S.F. (? S.F. S.F. S.F. • total HARDCOVER IN ZONE .. TOT/aPROPERTYAREAINZONE- A- ^ B S7VO XlOO _________^^S.F. SF. 7. 3.2 % • • • HARDCOVEjirALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE:. (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250* 250-500* EXISTING hardcover in ZONP K House • • ••• • *• •• • •• • Length • ^ Bt-Oarage - C. Driveway D. Sidevvalk E. - PaiioJOeck *' • • • 9 • • • •F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X :.i 4 I }c Ly X X X X X X X X X Width /-zo-v. ■ 500-1000* ' _______ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SVF. ■" • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.‘ S.F. S.F. O.'Oiher .X J ■ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE • A _ (ji^Ct_____+ B PROPpsED hardcover TN ?;9N^ • —A.. House- ■ B. parage Length . C.'. Driveway •“- ~ 0. srdewtlk E. Paiio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X xlOO - X’ X X X Wi(W» S.F. S.F. . A S.F. ' B Vo • • • . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.‘ ■ S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. 0. Other •• TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A O______^ B y^3 Cf x\oo • 2^30 SF. _ S F. A ______S F. B Q______V» e • • • •• • • •• • *« mm •• • SETBA'CK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) EXISTING HARD rOVER IN ZONE A.' House HARDCOVER CALCULATIQiOVORKSHEET 0-75' X 75-250*250-500 ’500-1000' Length S.F. VVidOi X X X • •• • S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Oarage •• e.* “Driveway t *x S.F. • • • X X S.F. S.F. D. Sidewalk X X S.F. S.F. »• •• #• • E. Patio/Dcck X X S.F. S.F. ----F; Landscape ___Underlain- By Plastic Or Fabric X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. Q. Other .X S.F. f. •. " ■ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE' TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE . - A 4^^0 ^ B , lb. 1^0+X 100 S.F. A S.F. B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE ‘ A House ^_________ X 2./OP S.F. • Length CfJ______3__£ac/^ ‘ WidOt X X /S S.F. _____S.F. S.F. B. Oarage 16 858 S.F.. • • •• C. Driveway X X S.F. S.F. -D; Sidewalk- • • M I •• • _ • • E. Paiio/Dcck X X /S^ S F. S.F. • X X /^2 0 S.F. S.F. F. Landscap. *“ ■ Underlain ' By Plastic Or Fabric X X X S.F. S.F. SF. 0. Other X S.F. •• •• • mm •• • • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A SOfO + B /5,/^0 xlOO - S.F. ■ S.F. Vi A’/s, no B y V »• •« mm •• • • • mm m □ □ 3 ODO A m ill Dill FRONT ELEVATIOM ■C4Hi M* • r- LEFT ELEVATION !•* • REAR ELEVATION i=?5>: ^ EE2t-:iF^»lUiOH Sill RIOHT ELEVATION tC4LM» Ml* • m ill <1, nil U i i I §CAL§. v»* • r.#* O ,4 rr fCf ■ '-• - j *N • I .*•%Tl HAIM FLOOR PL^ •C4UU ¥4- • r>#* rujH PLoom AmA • soft.UPTERFLOOM A«gA . eOFT. 4. Mli I w5 I II m iii ii, ill! !.l l\ P2 /rjyI * f. I H (lJ t-f. UPPER FLOOR PLAN % FLANNOm & M4( • —>»4 t«W«l «CAit. W4* • },iii <!, iii! 1.1 '!! II # <n. 4 t!ui:».;.,fi "*s\ (?Ca/ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 18,1998 (#12) #2370 GARY O’KEEFE, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD roNDITIONAL USE PEIUVnT - 9:42-10:07 P.M. - VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PEIUVAT The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Applicant was present. Gaffiron reported this is a request for variances for hardcover as well as a variance and conditional use permit for grading within 5' of a lot line for construction of a new residence to «place Ae existing home on the property.' This is a conforming lot as to lot area, and meets the 80% width standard for the LR-IC zone. Applicant proposes to tear down the house^d garage, and replace it with a house that meets the lakeshore setback and side setbacks. The applicant proposes to lower the top of the hill, and this requires grading \vithin the 0-75' and 75-250' zones. Gradmg m the si e would result in fill from the new basement excavation being placed near the road to accommodate a new attached garage. The applicant proposes a walkout which requires excavation m the 0-75 zone. Gaffron noted that staff recommends approval of a hardcover variance, but because of the Iom of mature trees, it is difficult to recommend cutting down the hill. Staff also recomnrends demal of the excavation to create a walkout based on past City practice and the goals and policies agamst shoreline topography changes as noted in the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant noted he bought this property with the intent to build a walkout residence. He stated that the neighbors are in favor of cutting down the hill, and this would make a more gradual slope from the lake. Lindquist asked if the hardcover calculations were done by a surveyor. Applicant replied no but he felt they are accurate. Gaffron noted he only included the hardcover* items sho\wi on the survey. Hawn asked if this was a bluff. Gaffron replied it did not meet the criteria to be considered as a bluff. Mrs. O’Keefe said there is a hardship, as they need something on the south side of the lot to get to the garage, noting the topography of the site. Lindquist asked for any public comments. There were none. Applicant noted that grading in the 0-75' zone will be necessary to remove the present house, so that excavation to create a walkout would not require much additional work. Gaffron noted th problem is there will still be a substantial cutting in the 0-75' zone to create a walkout once the present foundation is removed and the site brought back to match existing grades. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 18,1998 ^ (#12 - #2370 Gary O’Keefe - Continued) McMillaii asked if cutting the hill was intended as a means to obtain fill for the back of the site. Applicant replied no it was to make the lot more level with the neighboring properties. After additional discussion with applicant and indications by various Commission Members that the proposal could not be recommended for approval without certain revisions. Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to table Application #2370. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. • • (#13) #2371 TIM AND LORIE LINE, 4415 FOREST LAKE LANDING - CONDITIQJIAL USE PERMIT -10:08-10:12 P.M. The Certificz^fi of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Applicant preset? Van Zomeren reported the applicant is requesting a conditional use permi^ror land alteration in a floodplain to scrape on^nch of lawn to fill in another area in the yard^Cpproximately 40 yards would be used to top the inl and 50 cubic yards to be redistributed. St^ns recominending approval subject to applicant installing silt fencing and obtaining proper appeal from other agencies. Applicant is doing this project ii^ompliance with the WatersJj^ District as there is a wetland. Smith asked any for public comment^None. Hawn moved, McMillan seconded, to recdl^jmend aj^oval to grant conditional use permit. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#14) #2373 STEVE BECK, 2795 SHADVy&^^ROAD - VARIANCE - 10:13-10:30 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit^^Publication ^je rioted. Applicant present. Van Zomeren reported it is zon^ft,R-lB, and applicant is asking for a hardcover variance to allow a deck away from the Narrow^hannel. Approximate hardcover of 19.3 % is proposed to build a deck on the west side of tha^sidence. The house is 8 feet from the charmel. Staff is recommending to remove hardcover to «mply. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING minutes for JUNE 15,1998 • •%((*4 - S2383 Christine and Gary Valerius - Continued) will require a variance for wetland credit and lot width. Lot 2 consists of 2.28 wth 1.93 being buildabjcv- Wetlqjids comprise a t jtal of 1.2 acres for Lots 1 and 2, which will require standard drainage and wetland easements. Council had directed that the new lot could be sewered. application has been made to the Watershed District for stormwater review . • • • . • * • . : • . • . • • • . Van Zomeren stated the e.\isting access to the site is a private dri\*cway ofToF Baysidc Road. The applicant needs to supply a well location map and a utility construction plan prior to ina p a approval. Christine Valerius stated she will be requesting a wetland credit. Valerius stated Hennepin County has approved the driveway access. Stoddard questioned the need for a lot width variance. Van Zomeren slated the combined lots fall five feet short of the required 400 feet for lot width. No additional land is aNailablc for aCquisit to avoid the need for a variance. Van Zomeren noted only Lot 2 would have lake access. There were no public comments. ion I • Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, to approve Application #2383 for a two lot subdivision of the property located at 3750 Bayside Road that includes creating one new lot, a lot width variance and wetland credit per Staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays . OLD BUSINESS: CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS (#3) #2370 GARY O’KEEFE, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD ^ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:52 p.m. - 9:04 p.m. - VARIANCE AND Mr. and Mrs. O’KecFc were present. Gaffron reported that the Planning Commission previously reviewed the application at its May 18, 1998 meeting. Tlic applicant is requesting a hardcover variance as well as a variance and conditional use permit for grading w ithin five feet of a lot line and w ithin t ic - ? a 'cs ore protected area to permit construction of a new residence to replace the c.xisting residence. Gaffron stated the 0-75' protected area e.xists on both sides of the lot which might constilute hardship. • At its last meeting the Planning Commission recommended that the Applicant limit • • ^ the hardcover to 40% in the 75-250 setback, if possible, and to eliminate the walkout, ^ic Apph has submitted a revised site plan which reverses the layout of the house an c iminaks t ic wa ou , with some proposed changes to the driveway to reduce the hardcover. Ga rem smte a lar cova variance, a conditional use permit and variance for c.\cavation arc ^ta rccommen c limiting hardcover to 6765 square feet, with the allowable hardcover in the 7a-2a(Tzone linm 25% Gaffron noted the revised plan calls for 42.8% hardcover. If the 1> foot setback on both ends of the parcel is taken into account, the proposed hardcover would be around /o. In or cr g a variance, the Planning Commission must detenuine whether a hardship exists wit \ r^.gar side setbacks. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 15.199» (03 - ^2370 Gary O'Keefe - Continued) City Staff is recommending submittal of a revised grading plan, limiting the hardcover to 6765 quarc feet Overall, no walkou^ and ev^ating whether grading of the hill is appropriate in the 0-75'S zones. • • • • , • . . * * • . . . • . . • 0*KMre.stoted he is willing to reduce hardcover by eliminating a portion of the driveway. ' Chair Smith commented she had hoped the hardcover discrepancy could have been resolved prior' to tonight's meeting. O'Keefe stated that he calculated the hardcover at 8,665 square feet based on his own measurements. Gaffron noted that the staff did not calculate the current hardcover but relied upon an existing survey. Gaffron commented he would prefer having the O'Keefe's survev or calculate the amount of hardcover currently existing rather than have City Staff review the property. Gaffron indicated a bigger issue for the Planning Commission to decide upon is what is the appropriate hardcover for this propert)'. O'Keefe inquired why there are differences in hardcover requirements between Wav’zata and Orono when tliey share the same lake. McMillan indicated Orono’s ordinances governing hardcover are more restrictive. O'Kwfe also indicated ver>' little grading vrill be done in the area where the residence is presently situated. It was the concensus of the Planning Commission that a revised grading plan needs to be submitted in order to allow them to make a detemiination on a variance and conditional use penuit. O'Keefe indicated he would be able to supply a revised grading plan by Tluirsday. In response to a question by Chair Smith whether Mr. O'Keefe would be willing to reduce hardcover in the 75-250' zones, O'Keefe stated he would be in favor of reducing hardcover, noting that the Planning Commission had recommended hardcover be limited to 40% at its last meeting, which he has attempted to comply with. O’Keefe's architect has designed the residence with special pavers which would allow water to pass through. Commissioners agreed that grading to blend in with the neighbor's property was acceptable with an approved grading plan. • Chair Smith inquired whether anyone from the public wisTied to comment on this application. " Diann Goetten, City Council Representative, inquired why 40% hardcover was being recommended for this property. , Gaffron reported that 40% in the 75-250' zone was suggested as a figure that could be obtainable for this parcel of land. Since the Applicant is now proposing to raze the existing structure, the property would be considered as a new* buildable lot, '■ ‘ . and the standard hardcover requirements would be in effect. There was no further public comment. Hawn staled she would like hardcover to be reduced from 40%, noting that no vote was taken on ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 15,19';« 03 - (12370 Gary O'Keefe - Continued) the 40% hardcover limit. Berg fell that the hardcover excessive, and suggested the size of the house ^'^e reduced, noting that thCj^^ppIicant should slay within the height restrictions for that zoning district? '' * ' ‘ ^ . • • • •• - . • • • . * . . O'Keefe noted that hardcover'was excessive because of the drivewny design based on clcwlions,• * • • not because of a large house. • • Lindquist suggested the desirable amount of hardcover in his view would be 5731 square feet, or 25 percent of the area within the 75 - 250’ zone and the south 0 - 75' zone. Chair Smith stated the Applicant has the option of having the Planning Commission vote on the ^ application as currently proposed or tabling the matter to allow the Applicant more time to consider the various options open to him. Smith felt the application as presently submitted would not be recommended for approval, and if denied, there is a mandatory six month waiting period before a new application can be submitted. O'Keefe stated he has attempted to comply with the requests of the Planning Commission. Gaffron stated the current proposal for the hardcover is at 33% if you take the 75’ setback areas into consideration. In order to reach the 25% hardcover limit, the Applicant must reduce hardcover by 1900 square feet. O'Keefe asked how remodeling the existing house would affect hardcover percentages. Smith responded that requirements are the same for both remodeling and new construction. O'Keefe requested the Planning Commission table the matter. Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application #2370. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS (#5) 2361 WILLIAM AND LA WAYNE YAEGER, 310 BIG ISLAND - VARIAI 9:05 - 9:27 p.m. ;s, The Certificate of 'ublication were noted. Mr. and Mjg^T^gcr and their attorney. Win Curtis^wll^iiijcsci^ Gaffr^^tatcd the applicants arc requesting a lot area/w^(i^arianc^OTh^|^^csignation of Lot ^fas an independent Record Lot in the R^^^l^^^nd lakcshorc sctb.acK^^j^'lback and hard^i^w\arianccs for construcliono^^^^^wnal cabin to replace a pre-existing cabin, atK^vi^^cthacL^giiii^^^^gazcbo. Gaffron noted the City rezoned Big Island from LR-1A-I Single Family Lakeshore Residential Subdislrict to RS, Seasonal Recreational, back in 1983. Lots 64-65 and Lots 8-9-10-1 1 were designated as Record Lot 15 by virtue of their common ownership by Roy Ahem. \ aegers have subsequently purchased Lot 64 from Ahem, with Lots 8-9-10-11-65 being owned by Nanc> Fames ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 20,1998 (Kirk Otteson, continued) Ur .quist stalW lMh^pl5!feftyi$ ov.er hardcover limit. aresffHHi^should be placed against the properly restric|il(j7urther hardcover. Hawn noted agreement. Stoddard^nended his motion by adding the stipulation that no additional hardcover will be allowed on this prd^rty. Shirl^ Wickman stated the Planning Comr-’ssion is Inconsistent in tlw applying of hardcover restrictions and perhaps should consider aao^ ng a blanket policy toJpndle future hardcover requei Sloddar^^^d the Planning Commission and City Council have^ld a joint meeting to discuss hardcover i^^ggts, and the concensus was to be more cons^^livq in granting variances to hardcover. Chair Smith commente^^?F^i^a^hip aspects of Ih^property warrant additional discussion and review by the Planning CommisslOT?*i^^rall th^J^nning Commission Is trying to honor the existing codes on the books and to be as consIsten^Jji^Ssible. Chair Smith said it is the Planning Commission’s Intent to put those propertv^wier^Jl^iiticc who have exceeded the hardcover limit by re^tncting additional hardcover. Otteson stated he understi le stipulation. Hawn moved, Lin^l^^st seconded, to add a stipulation to the motion calling for no further hardcover for the property located at 710 North Arm Drive. VOTE ON AMENDMENT AND MOTION: Ayes 6, Nays 0. {U2) 2370 GARY O'KEEFE, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 6:55 p.m. - 7:13 p.m. Mr. and Mrs. Gary O’Keefe were present. Gaffron reported that the Planning Commission previously reviewed the application at Us May 18 and June 15,1998 meetings t he Planning Commission recommended the Applicants limit hardcover to 25 percent^ the combined 75'-250' and south 0-75’ zones. The Applicants were also requested to submit a revised grading pla-A Gaffron stated the Applicants have submitted a revised plan calling for a total hardcover of 5.725 square feet which meets the Planning Commission’s recommendation from the last meeting. The revised plan calls for a newly constructed one-story home with an attached three stall garage, and the Applicants are requesting a variance to the hardcover to add an additional 300 square feel of which would yield final hardcover of 6,025 square feel or 26.3 percent. Minor grading Is proposed in the north 0’-75’ zone to blend contours from old foundation to new home. The grading plan needs to be further defined if revisions are still planned along the north 0-75 lot line. The Applicants are also proposing to construct an optional retention pond in the south 0 -75 zone for potential mitigation of additional hardcover. Gaffron commented this new proposal meets the Planning Commissions recommendations from the prior meeting, and Staff is comfortable with the revised plan. Gaffron noted Resolution No. 2831 adopted back in 1990 granted variances to this property and contained language in the resolution which led the Applicant to conclude that he was entitled to more Page 2 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 20,1998 • (Gary O’Keefej continued) . hardcover than what is being recommended by the Planning Commission. Hardcover back in 1990 without the two zones being combined was at approximately 6,800 square feel. • • • • * • • • • • • Chair Smith questioned whether Staff had any concerns regarding the drainage for this property. Gaffron remarked Staff is comfortable with what Is being proposed. Mike Sharratt, Architect, staled the O’Keefe’s have reduced hardcover by eliminating the patio and a portion of the driveway, but would like the Planning Commission to consider allowing a retention pond as mitigation in exchange for additional hardcover. Chair Smith commented the architect has done a marvelous job In bringing the plans into compliance, but stated the size of the house could be reduced to allow for the patio. Chair SmUh asked for public comment. • Mark Versig, neighbor, commented he is aware and in favor of what the O’Keefe’s are proposing to do, noting that the drainage problems should be alleviated by the proposed grading. .» ' Sharratt stated what is currently being proposed Is the best plan for this property. Gaffron stated he is in favor of the retention pond but Is not convinced it should be used as mitigation for additional hardcover. McMillan stated she would not be in favor of additional hardcover in exchange for the retention pond since it would be setting a dangerous precedent, but felt the retention pond would be an ideal solution to the drainage issue. Lindquist stated he was in favor of the proposed plan with the exclusion of the patio. Stoddard noted the size of the house or the driveway could be reduced to allow for the patio. Sharratt remarked It would not be feasible to reduce the driveway any further. Sharratt commented if the hardcover is limited to 25%, he would not recommend reducing the size of the house to allow for the patio. Chair Smith staled she is in favor of keeping the hardcover at 25 percent, noting the owner will need to decide whether the patic is desired. • * Hawn stated she also was in favor of limiting the hardcover to 25%. Gaffron commented if the O'Keefe’s decide to add a retention pond, that would need to be done under a separate application. Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to approve Application #2370, granting a conditional use permit for grading within 5’ of a lot line and within the 0-75’ lakeshore protected area to permit construction of a new residence to replace the existing residence for the property located at 1392 Batdur Park Road, with the understanding hardcover will be limited to 25% in the combined 75-250* and south 0-75’ zones with no additional hardcover being allowed. Per the request of the O’Keefe’s, the patio will be eliminated. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 3 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 27,1993 •V'Z « , I* (#7) #2370 GARY O’KEEFE, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4128 Mrs. O'Keefe was present. Gaffron reported that the applicants were requesting a hardcover variance and conditional use permit and variance for grading within 5* of a lot line and within the 0-75' lakeshore setback to construct a new residence. The revised site plans meet the Planning Commission recommendation to maintain 25% hardcover, which is a decrease from 7,258 s.f. to 5,725 s.f. The applicants also" proposed a pond but the Planning Commission did not want to tie variance approvals to stormwater management. Gaffron noted that no decks were proposed for this lakeshore property. The applicants have indicated they are willing to give up decks for living space, although a future owner may seek variances for a deck. Both Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of the proposed plans. Jabbour commented that Council had given Plaiming Commission direction to limit the number of variances. Goetten indicated that she had been at two Plarming Commission meetings, and the current plan was a good compromise for the property. Kelley expressed concern about the mass of buildings on lakeshore properties. He questioned if Council would want to add a condition limiting additional mass, such as a second story, for this residence. Jabbour agreed with Kelley that massing is an issue and Council should continue to monitor lakeshore structures for excessive mass in future applications. Goetten requested stronger wording in the resolution on Page 5, Condition 2. The word likely is to be removed indicating that no future increase in hardcover will be approved. Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4128 granting hardcover variances in the 75-250' zone to permit construction of a new residence, and to permit grading and land alterations within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area. Vote: 5 Ayes, 0 Nays. tl >nal use ;tback to MfUii 725 s.f. variance shave lay seek “the le number Lirrent plan Ufi:loT • OJlWHtl .• • ^ 4 lestioned if ry, for this Dntinue to Drd "likely" •ItlUM tmwsrz :nRi cover lermit »Ayes, 0 ijinwriii Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ^ m w ^^ M MJLM V ^ ^ % U W # AA % V A A w il •* CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 1 4 3 ; A RESOLUTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 4128 GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2; SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8; AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISIONS 16(J) AND 16(L) AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.03 SUBDIVISION 19 - FILE #2370 $• •' WHEREAS, Gary O’Keefe (hereinafter "the applicant") is owTier of the property located at 1392 Baldur Park Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 17 and 18, Block 1, Baldur Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2; 10.55, Subdivision 8; and 10.56, Subdivision 16(J) and 16(L) to permit the construction of a new residence constituting hardcover in the 75-250’ zone in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed in that zone, and to permit grading and land alterations within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area where such work is normally prohibited. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2370. 2. The property is 0.71 acres in area and is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. Page 1 of 6 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 14^ 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 18, June 15 and July 20, 1998 and on a vote of 6-0 recommended approval of a hardcover variance to allow hardcover on the property in the amount of 5,725 s.f. per the revised plans, and approval of a CUP for grading within the 0-75' lakeshore protected zones, based upon findings which are enumerated in Resolution No. 4128 dated July 27, 1998. • 4. On July 27, 1998 the City Council granted approval of tfie proposed variances and adopted Resolution No. 4128 with conditions. On August 10, 1998 the applicant requested Council approval for a revised plan which w'ould reduce the hardcover associated with the house and driveway footprints in order to allow •the addition of a patio while not exceeding the 5,725 s.f. hardcover level. The further revised plan eliminates the third upper level garage stall and reduces the area of driveway to free up additional hardcover for the patio. A lower level storage area will be incorporated below the garage, but will not be served by a driveway or other hardcover. The Council voted 4-0 to reconsider the application and voted 4-0 to allow the further revision as proposed subject to still meeting the 5,725 s.f. hardcover limit; that no driveway will be allowed to serve the lower storage area; and that no future variances are to be granted for this property. Council directed that staff bring a new resolution to the next Council meeting for adoption. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, conunents by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance and CUP on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserv'e a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 6 CITYof OROWO M .. i'i' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL • . NO. - ^ 7.The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for the proposed grading in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zones as proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will such use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use.of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS • # * • Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2; 10.55, Subdivision 8; and 10.56, Subdivisions 16(J) and 16(L) to permit the construction of a new residence and amenities constituting hardcover on the property of 5,725 s.f. per the approved revised site and hardcover plan attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, and further grants a Conditional Use Permit for land alterations within the 0-75' lakeshore protected zones and within 5' of a lot line per the approved grading plan and site plan attached to this resolution as Exhibit B, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. No hardcover will be allowed in the northerly 0-75' zone. The only hardcover allowed in the 0-75' zone will be the portion of driveway as shown on the approved site plans. Hardcover in the southerly 0-75' and 75-250' zones shall not exceed the square footages per the site plan and hardcover worksheet attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, and shall not in any case exceed 5,725 s.f. in total. Applicant is advised that hardcover on the property based on this approval will exceed the normal limits, and any future proposal to increase hardcover on the property will not be approved. It is the intent of the City Council that the level of hardcover approved with this resolution not be e.xceeded in the future, and tha^ no additional hardcover variances will be granted in the future. Page 3 of 6 o. . o u •• CITYof ORONO il' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL • NO. 4 1^.^ 3. 4. • » •. •V 5. 6. 7. 8. The revised plan which eliminates a third garage stall at the upper level, incorporates a storage garage below the remaining two stalls, and reduces the footprint of the house in order to allow construction of a patio, is approved subject to a condition that no hardsurface or driveway may be installed to the lower storage area. Any significant changes to the approved house footprint, to the approved grading plan, or other changes which result in a plan that City staff deems to be potentially in conflict with the intent of this approval, shall be subject to further Council review. t Site grading within the northerly 0-75' zone with the intent to create a walkout situation shall not be allowed. Erosion protection as may be required by the Building Inspector shall be maintained at all times. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 24, 1999). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 4 of 6 O k • 0%CITYof ORON m ** •• Ai' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 1 Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 24th day of August, 1998, ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of August, 1998, by Gabncl Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 i 3 -■ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this___day of ^7pfc-?!o^v- 1998 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared Lr^rl H. _________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. ^*®’^fU6llC-MlWCES0W .• „ HENNERN COUNTY NOTARY PUBLIC w A y STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of j 1998 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 6 of 6 % •• approved HARDCOVER: I ~ . I .* ' 0-75’ North: NONE * 75-250’&0-W’South (Area-21.900 **)• \i House *680 sf ., Attached 2-staU 0306* 360 $f' Stoop, Driveway j ,f I 5.725 / 22.900 - 25% ^ t v>» - i--n •«'.mm — • ^ < JS '‘V ' \ V;^ _ \ ■ IS 7 \ ■ \- ^x/rt/2.»r A . 4.iil • t \ • ‘"JJJ: 20 y.V M t I Wf:': • via—V- - I VOI |i .V‘* • '• 2... • • h »SSfE •Vniv»- (cQ ___________ V*7i V r •Vi i-tl-N. a?iC^, -’i ‘‘ Ml, V »« -.*•#1 9 C 'K •• ••, rt** • — — r ■ • I I / \ t>a^B PitoMT* ir>we» -V I«/ * •“ E»eces^ ^ ^fiea’ts p ■ / 1 intAtmAeat ntM lucae. ’•• ' ■ ••'i/ It1 .. iK ] i ' t •• '*11 •••‘C •• •* • I J • •' • » •' y* W \- v.*/> .v\\. •.'•.t.K l« VN-i -\VJ/ ^A- ( "iv-^ Ftslfei* Pt>t<i*MJM-oi^. ijVf n -■'2l ' '*‘‘ >/ —“*,hiit7*.aArioN *^•9 .• I - I - :_<...l5:e..,f?^.v-- ............ ■ t>.&ie fffs H--^. - -'^1. +150 ’0>>‘irEP . ol^ ^22. IPiy* Jr 1 fVr4v\, I?): “rr , ‘^'^7 T I 'V V r ] •tovLu H 3R-**‘^-p' ^ I / io2: 1* • I A* i*/*t»f ' ,hi»K • • /V.^l»19^*0^^ I I .. * I .11 1^^ Utyi^i j. '>Me. f=M^*r kw.H«-Grn> e^s f4-^^ ijta gf^. • 4 [t^ou . f^o\ • S^^re\^ 3 of 5 TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Staff RE:#2477 George W. Stickney/Mid US Properties Limited Partnership, having an interest in 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road Class III Preliminary Plat Subdivision—Public Hearing Exhibits: A B C D E F G H Application Plat map Property O’ATier's list Topo Map Proposed Survey City Engineer's letter Assessor's calculation Summary of Park Commission's comments Zoning:RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Comprehensive Plan:Rural Service/Rural Residential Application: The applicant is proposing to purchase the two properties located at 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road to subdivide them into 8 lots. The existing residence at 250 Old Crystal Bay Road would be retained and located on proposed Lot 2. The residence at 340 Old Crystal Bay Road would be removed. U2477 Stickney 250 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision PC~4/J9/99 page-l LOT INFORMATION The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 20.2 acres into 8 (eight) new single family residential lots. TTie proposed lots are: Lot Number Dry Acres Total Acres Loti 2.05 2.05 Lot 2 3.05 3.05 Lot 3 2.24 2.24 Lot 4 2.00 2.00 Lot 5 2.50 2.90 Lot 6 2.0 2.62 Lot?2.05 2.20 Lot 8 2.20 2.20 Outlot A (proposed road).95 .95 The total lot area is 20.2 acres where 18.9 acres is dry buildable and 1.3 acres is wetland. The proposed density is 1 dwelling unit per 2.36 dry acres and 1 dwelling unit per 2.5 total acres. The proposed lots meet the minimum lot area requirements. The proposed building pads provide adequate area for construction of new single family homes. Lots 3,4, and 5 on the cul-de-sac do not meet the minimum lot width of 200' at the 50’ setback. Loti Lot 1 is proposed at 2.05 acres along Old Crystal Bay Road. This lot will have frontage on the private road. The property line along Old Crystal Bay Road will be considered the side yard adjacent to street for setback purposes. No access shall be provided from Old Crystal Bay Road. m77 Stickney 250 & 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-3 Lot 2 Lot 2 is the largest proposed lot with 3.05 acres. The existing residence at 250 Old Crystal Bay Road will be located on this site. This property has an existing bam and other out buildings. The bam is proposed to be removed. The bam cannot remain on the property because the reduced size of the lot would no longer be conforming for the size of the bam. The new front yard for this lot will be along the new private road even though the house faces Old Crystal Bay Road. The rear yard will be the shortest, most northerly propertj' line. Lot 3 Lot 3 is proposed to be 2.24 acres. The front yard will be located on the cul-de-sac. This lot will have three side yards and a rear yard as shown on the survey. The proposed building site is located in the forested area near the rear of the lot. The lot will be served from a driveway from the cul-de- sac. Lot 4 Lot 4 is proposed to be 2 acres located on the cul-de-sac. The rear back half of this lot is forested. 1 he proposed building site is located near the center of the lot. The lot will be served from a driveway from the cul-de-sac. Lots The *»;:cond largest lot is Lot 5. It is proposed to be 2.9 acres with 2.f acres dry buildable. The lot is next to the Luce Line trail and contains a wetland. The stormwater management pond is proposed to be located on this site north of the wetland. The site will be served by a driveway from the cul-de- sac. Lot 6 Lot 6 is proposed to be 2.62 acres total with 2.0 acres dry buildable. This site is also adjacent to the Luce Line trail and contains a wetland. The lot will be served by a driveway from the private road. Lot? Lot 7 is proposed to be 2.20 acres total with 2.05 dr>' acres. This lot also contains wetlands and is adjacent to the Luce Line trail. Tiis site contains existing out buildings serving the residence at 340 Old Crystal Bay Road. The buildi.ngs will need to be removed. This lot will have access by a H2477 Stickney 250 & 340 Old Crystal Bay Hoed South Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-4 driveway from the private road. Lots Lot 8 will have frontage along Old Crystal Bay Road. It is also adjacent to the Luce Line trail. The existing house on the lot is proposed to be removed. This lot will have a new front yard on the private road. The lot line adjacent to Old Crystal Bay Road will be considered a side yard adjacent to street for setback purposes. No access shall be provided from Old Crystal Bay Road. The existing curb cut will need to be closed. ZONING The parcel is zoned RR-IB, Rural Residential District. The minimum lot area requirement is two (2) acres. The minimum setback requirements are noted below: Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Adjacent to Street 2 acres, dry buildable 200'50'50'30'50' Wetland Setback No building, excavation, grading or filling is allowed in or Nvithin 26' of the wetlands. The wetland setback will apply to lots 5-7. Septic Setbacks The minimum setback requirements for septic systems is 75' from wetlands, water supply wells and stormwater ponds. All 8 (eight) lots will be served by septic and wells. Septic sites are to be located 20 from hardcover surfaces, property lines, buildings, and buried pipes. The proposed septic sites meet the setback requirements from wetlands and property lines. Future well sites have not been identified. Proposed building sites can be served by driveways without encroaching on the 20 setback requirement. No septic reports have been received as of the writing of this staff report. The subdivider s septic U2477 Stickne^' 250 & 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision PC~4/l9/99 pages site designer has been in contact with the City's On-Site Septic Systems Manager, Steve Weckman. Staff will attach a septic report as an Exhibit to this report when it is available. ACCESS The preliminary plat has been reviewed by the City Engineer. The proposed location for the private road appears acceptable. It has been sent to Hennepin County for review. The proposed street section will need to be 28' to meet city standards because the number of units to be served exceeds 7. Water from the private road shall be diverted from Old Crystal Bay Road (County Road 84). GRADING There is an existing ditch on this parcel which serves as a drainage way for a pond. A driveway for proposed Lot 3 may cross this ditch. If so, it should not impede flows through tne existing ditch. The final plan needs to identify edl structures to be removed. A grading and erosion control plan should be submitted for the entire site for review. Erosion controls should be in place before any grading to protect the wetland. Erosion control measures will be required during construction of the houses and septic sites. DRAINAGE The site is located within the French Lake Drainage district. The site drains southerly to an existing wetland along the south edge of the site. Storm water drains to the wetland from the north to the south. The flow from the north is routed through an existing ditch. Ditch stabilization may be required if the flow will continue to route through it. An alternative would be to install storm sewer to convey flows from north of the site to the stormwater management pond. The pond would need to be sized if this is the proposed drainage method. There is a 36" pipe for a southerly outlot of the existing wetland. The city's proposed stonnwaier management plan states that WL'.er quantity may be a problem downstream and recommends restricting the size of the pipe to 27". Reducing the outlet pipe would result in a reduction of the rate of stormwater downstream but would increase the high water level of the wetland to 966. The City Engineer will need to review the wetland outlet sizing after a drainage area map, storm sewer, and ponding calculations are provided. The calculations should be based on the total drainage area that flows into the wetland. The plans will need to be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). EASEMENTS The City Engineer has recommended that a 10' trail easement be dedicated along the west property line adjacent to Old Crystal Bay Road. Internal and perimeter drainage and utility easements shall be provided 5' along all interior lot lines and 10' along perimeter lines. Drainage easements shall be #2477 Stickney 250 A 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-6 provided across all wetlands, drainageways, and ponding areas, PARK DEDICATION FEE The County Assessor has reviewed the proposed subdivision and has determined that the value of the six new sites is approximately $600,000 for the raw land. The park dedication fee for six new lots would be $4,900 for each lot for a total of $29,400. The Park Commission has reviewed the proposed subdivision and has requested land dedication for the trail. Dedication of land would reduce the park dedication fee. A trail easement would accomplish the same goal. Staff recommends a 10 ’ trail easement dedication rather than the City accepting land. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval subject to the subdivider addressing the City Engineer’s issues, including the dedication of a 10 ’ trail easement, and a staff review of the final septic site design. Any comments for the DNR regarding drainage and from Hennepin County should be reviewed and included as exhibits to this report (not available at the time of wnting). n2477 Stickney 250 & 340 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-7 Application M ^ V 77 Date Received 3-17- Amount Paid InO^ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ^ ... / / ^ ^ / q Site address____^ d/gf (j'ySi rc\\ Ju^'r •__________■ Property Identification Number fPID') ^ ^ ^ H , e>'j \n'L3 U OVJ j Please check one - Property____abstract or _____torrens? Attach legal description to application. Name Address Co\y^^^TXf Dr~ Phone(home) City ~ Pro/7^ Zip^»S^Phone (work) OWNER (if different than applicant) Address ~zr«? O^d ha^JJf Name s^O City ^ro.-o iT.aVir<^ 3V6 O^efC-j^fifPhone (home) Qn-^t ZipPhone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District /T.9 /.'3 Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels"7.0 fw.w- * VI —, —... y/ S, r. Residential; no. of units ^ ^ Other (specify) /SJUz£ PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes _____ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) X" Subdivision for New Building Sites 'Z Existing Units ^ _ New Units Total Units Number of Building Sites Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) <F -Z. __Units per*^^^-^ Acres __Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land 'yC_____Residential _ Other (specify) |Ng3 f -ss iShv: A •\ f S3 * 'X yc *56^' :<>5s MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION y^’ayment of fees prefer to "application fees" listed below. tX-CCompleted application fonn. i-'ST Preluninaiy plat information on Certificate of Survey. 4. Certified Property Ownm List of owners within 350' (yo\x must obtain this list from Hetmepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 5. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Zoning OfBcial's Signature ______________________________________Date________________________________ MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FE^AL APPLICATION 1. Pa>ment of fees (refer to Preliminary Subdivision / .pproval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of for aal plat 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Develop^ ApeemeflrindtelteRof Credit. Zoning Official's Signature ,__C Date / 7- ^ 7 Totals L APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check [X] those which apply) A|^bppUcatlon Base Fees: Sketch Plan Review (Class I, n& III) $250.00 Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $350.00 ^ Subdivision Application (Class I & II) $350.00 _____ Preliminary Subdivision Application $375.00 + $25.00/Iot (Class HI & all non-residential) _____ Final Plat Application (Class HI) $200.00 _____ Legal Review and Filing: _____Subdivision only $75.00 _____Subdivision w/easements and covenants min. $200.00 _____ Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) _____ Legal and Engineering Review Fees (as incurred) _____ Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change from original application) _____ Renewal of Class III, Preliminary Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change from original application) _____ Renewal of Final Class HI Si’.bdivision Application $ 150.00 (No change from original application) B. Special Improvement Fees* _____ Proposed Private Roads $600.00 + $.50/lineal ft.;_____lin. ft. x .50 = $_____ _____ Proposed Public Roads $900.00 + $.50/lineal ft. ,_____lin. ft x .50 = $_____ _____ Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $900.00 _____ Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.00 + $25/stub _____ Proposed Waiermain Extension $250.00 + $25/stub _____ Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) $200.00 _____ On-Site System. Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $50.00/per lot x *7 new lots C« Flexible Application Fees/Misc. Fees _____ Variar.ee $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) ______ _____ Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision $100.00 ______ _____ PRD Application with Subdivision $30.00/Dwelling Unit ______ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attomev*, Plaiuiing Co.-nmission and Council necessary JOy^process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. “ Applicant's Signature —' Date 3S-0 Owner's Signature Applicant must have*all submittals into the City Office 25^fay«^fore the Planning Commission meeting Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicant must be present at all scheduled reviev.* meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise t^e Building & Zonmg Office of this <manp prior to the meeting. _ <2 ^ RUH DATE 02/02/99 BATCH 506 HENNEPIK COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI935^01 PAGE 16 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 06-117-23 11 0011 02565 COUNTRYSIDE DR T B NICH ICE HICH ij THOMAS B HICH 2565 COUNTRYSIDE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 06-117-23 12 0006 02615 COUNTRYSIDE DR D BECKSTROH I K BECKSTRON C DARRELL I KENWYN BECKSTROH 2615 COUNTRYSIDE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 06-117-23 12 0018 02735 COUNTRYSIDE DR W J I H RUTLEDGE ^JOSEPH R I MONIQUE RUTLEDGE 2735 COUNTRYSIDE DR W LONG LAKE HN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 06-117-23 12 0019 02715 COUNTRYSIDE DR W . J R LOWE 111 I J HILLER LOWE fJ R LOWE III I J MILLER LOWE 2715 COUNTRYSIDE DR W LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 06-117-23 13 0001 00360 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S RIP HINNICH 0 RODNEY L HINNICH 360 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 06-117-23 13 0002 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED G J DODD G J DODD 1231 ARCHER LANE PLYMOUTH HN 55667 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE I TAXPAYER ' NAHE/ADDR 38 06-117-23 IS 0003 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE OF HINN STATE OF HINN CDNRl CLUCE LINE TRAIL I PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE . TAXPAYER 0 NAHE/ADDR 38 06-117-23 13 0006 02655 COUNTRYSIDE DR W K S I A H BARES KEITH S I ANN H BARES 2655 COUNTRYSIDE DR W LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 06-117-23 16 0005 PROP ADDR 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OWNER NAHE THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TAXPAYER ONR-REAL ESTATE MGT NAHE/ADDR I ATTN TAX SPECIALIST 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL HN 55155-6030 38 06-117-23 13 0006 00250 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD S JOAN THOMPSON ^JOAN THOMPSON 250 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD S LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 06-117-23 13 0007 02635 COUNTRYSIDE DR W D L SCALITl I D H SCALITl D L SCALITl I D H SCALITl 2635 COUNTRYSIDE DR W LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 06-117-23 21 0016 028C:. SOMERSET LA H A I H R JAHN HARK A I MICHELLE R JAHN 2805 SOMERSET LA LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 06-117-23 13 0005 02695 COUNTRYSIDE DR W H R 8 J G KNITTEL QhARK R I JOANNE 0 KNITTEL 2695 COUNTRYSIDE DR W LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 06-117-23 16 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASS16NED STATE OF MINNESOTA STATE OF HINN (DNR) (LUCE LINE TRAIL! . 38 06-117-23 26 0002 00225 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N I A D HAY I NORMAN HAY 225 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD S LONG LAKE HN 55356 ^<1 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR I 38 06-117-23 26 00C3 00335 CLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S MARY D RYERSE MARY D RYERSE 335 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 06-117-23 26 0006 00605 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S C C KOZLOSKI f T P BRENNER C XOZLOSKI/T P BRENNER 605 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD S LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 06-117-23 26 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STATE OF HINN STATE OF HINN (DNR) CLUCE LINE TRAIL) o RUN DATE 02/02/99 BATCH 506 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE ^TAXPAYER ^ NANE/AODR SB 04-117-2S 29 OOOB 02B15 DEER RUN TR W A i S N HILL * I WEBSTER A i SHELLEY N HILL 2815 DEER RUN TR LONG LAKE HN 55S56 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST SB 09-117-2S 29 0019 02B60 DEER RUN TR COLLEEN BARAN SIMONS TRUSTEE € J R SIMONS t C BARAN SIMONS 2B60 DEER RUN TR LONG LAKE MN 55S56 REPORT NO. PI9S5901 PAGE 15 SB 09-117-2S 29 0015 02B20 DEER RUN TR B D B N P SISKA Q BRIAN t NANCY SISKA 2B20 DEER RUN TR LONG LAKE MN 55856 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME . TAXPAYER I NAME/ADDR SB 09-117-25 29 0017 00086 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD ASSOC INC ROBERT HARE 1600 LONG LAKE BLVD ORONO MN 55S56 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 86 09-117-2S 92 0006 02690 FOX ST f D I J PLUCKER DARRELL A PLUCKER 2690 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55S91 86 09-117-23 92 0016 02760 WHITE OAK CIR J L JR t K C SHANNON TAXPAYER % JOHN M t KATHERINE SHANNON NAME/ADDR 2760 WHITE OAK CIRCLE LONG LAKE MN 55356 . PROP ADDR OWNER NAME 86 09-117-28 29 0020 02655 SOMERSET LA N I A D HAY i NORMAN t ANGELA D HAY 2655 SOMERSET LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 86 09-117-23 92 0016 02790 WHITE OAK CIR P I M DOHERTY * PATRICK J DOHERTY 2790 WHITE OAK CIRCLE LONG LAKE MN 55856 TOTAL BATCH 506 00026 86 09-117-28 91 0008 02650 FOX ST K 8 K ANDERSON i KEITH I KATHLEEN ANDERSON 2650 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55S9I 36 09-117-23 92 0017 02760 WHITE OAK CIR R ft J ftLTMO I RICKARD A JOAN H KLIND 278« WHITE OAK CIRCLE LONO LAKE HN 55SSA I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATIOH AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE tM THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. JATI Bonestroo. Roscne. AnderUk jind Associates, me. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. PE. • Joseph C Anderhk. PE. • Marvin L Sorvala. PE. • Richard E. TUrner. RE. • Glenn R. Cook. PE. • Robert G. Schunicht. PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. • Robert W Rosene. RE and Susan M. Eberlln. C PA.. Senior Consultants Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PE. • Keith A. Gordon. PE. • Robert R Pfefferle. PE. • Richard W. Poster. PE. • David O. Lojhc'a. P£ • Robert C Russek. A.I.A. • Mark A. Hanson. PE. • Michael T. Rautmann. PE. • Ted KJleld. PE. • Kersneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolfs. PE. • Sidney P. Williamson. PX. LS. • Robert F. Kotsmith • Agnes M. Ring • Michael P Rau. RE. • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE. Offices: St. Paul. Rochester. Wiiimar and St. Cloud, mini • Milwaukee. Wl Website: www bonestroo com APR 0 6 1999 Ci i Y o,- ^ J Bonestroo «?osene Anderlik & j\\\ Associates Engineers & Architects April 5,1999 Elizabeth VanZomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post OfQce Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re: Crystal Bay Preserve FDeNo. 139-2477 Dear Liz: We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed Crystal Bay Preserve eight-lot subdivision. The site is located east of Old Crystal Bay Road and north of the Luce Line Trail in the in the northeast quarter of Section 23. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1. Access: The proposed access location off from Old Crystal Bay Road appears acc^table. Plans should be submitted to Hennepin County for their review. The proposed street section for the roadway will need to be 28 feet in width to meet City standards for a private street serving 7 or more units. The street should be designed so that water from the private road is diverted away from C.R. 84. Final plans should include geotechnical recommendations and street design including horizontal and vertical curve information. 2. Grading: A grading and erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review. It appears that the driveway to serve Lot 3 will need to cross the existing ditch. The ditch serves as a drainage way for an existing pond located north of this site. Driveway co.TStruction to serve this lot should not impede flows through the existing ditch. It is assumed but not stated that the existing buildings in the southwest corner of the site will be removed. Final plans should identify all structures to be removed. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any gra^ng. particularly along the wetland. Additional erosion control will be needed during construction of the houses and septic systems. 3. Drainage: The draft version of the City ’s’ Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shows that the site lies within the French Lake drainage district. The site drains southerly to an existing wetland located along the south edge of the property. Storm water from north of this site also drains to this wetland. These flows from the nor^ are currently routed to the wetland through the existing ditch located along the eastern edge of the property. The ditch section should be evaluated relative to erosion potential. If flows will continue to be routed through the ditch, some type of ditch stabilization may be required to prevent excessive scouring and additional erosion. An alternative to ditch stabilization would be to install storm sewer to convey flows from north of the site to the proposed NURP pond. These flows should be included when sizing the NURP pond. Our records indicate that the southerly outlet for the existing wetland is a 36-inch diameter pipe under the Luce Line Trail. F 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 - 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 The SWMP indicates that water quantity may be a problem downstream from this site and recommends restricting this outlet to 27 inches in diameter. Reducing the size of the wetland outlet pipe wili reduce the rate of storm water downstream but will inaease the higli water level (HWL) of the wetland to an devation of approximately 966. We can review the wetland outlet sizing once a drainage area map, storm sewer and ponding calculations are provided. These calculations should be based on the total drainage area reaching the wetland. Final plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for thdr review. 4. Easements: A 10-foot trail easement should be dedicated along the west edge of the property. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of -ways. Drainage easements should be provided across all wetlands, drainage ways and pond areas. 5. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we will prq)are an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. Please contaa me at 651-604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Tom Kdlogg Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono Applicatioa # ^ ^ DateReceiyed 3-17- Amount Paid ino^ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ^ f / ^ jf J <D Site address____L.5*0 ^ d/gf CrjfS>rcilu^_^ fic^on ^ •_________, Property Identification Number fPID') OH 6 ^ t^\H 'L3 U quo / Please check one - Property abstract or____torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Name Address City__ Tou 7^ uU^^Tit Dr^ Phone (home) /?^ Zip •^>5^Phone (work) V~/~J OWNER (if different than ^licant) ^ / ,/'• ] Name >lJo Address C-t,rr^il (la Phone (home) City Qri-* Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels r. n Residential; no. of units y ^ ____ Other (specify) Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) f '57 ><r Subdivision for New Building Sites •j P'.vT: V.Number of Building Sites c Existing Units ^ New Units •• • 0 Total Units • ^ *\ .• Proposed Gross Dcr.sitvr 9 P' Units '* Acres \ fi ■%’ ^ ^ • Mininiun*. Lo ’ 5!ze Z -■ •, ?i. I. ry Lu’.idacle Land a Proposed Use (check)Residential Other (specify^ ^ 9 4*-VPLc/(^ of Q fj(fu/ $ircs ^A//U;rir^/f7CCY OOO (^of^ T**e jl/fu/ LAr'i^, (?6-^PC i^CKcoo tc.<^.cco/s,f^ /7 \Jl J, CONMeWTS j 'fm oowraoN u__n t- T'l d^.Li±.: _______________ Tpy P^^Lk l/^^Y) .... .10.,., tJ- W t A..„ L./5/v^}?__i?itelC /)_Tkw............ lOJ^—tn f—5J.IC jc /yALySi^MWJ^M /iw l\)ifJ/?L U)hAV7 T/>) 1 rvi^l/F IVE S'KisHhU f?lb€ tKAL Fz^KTMk. . _C^6g.. rix^iL WLLJ.UJ A.1^7 « ^ ^ m. . I ^ ^^ k\ bsy^ mY; b rL>£ rK^VL u//i />i/;Lf kifAT TJ rug LhsS^^\IhAX. ccai,]^__j)_ioJr^ V C/UU_i,]3 H S^hPiY TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Staff April 9,1999 SUBJECT: #2474 Steven and Susan Wilson 325 South Brown Road and 2150 Abingdon Way Lot Line Rearrangement—Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Lots Existing Proposed 325 South Brown Road 14.46 acres 15.32 acres 2150 Abingdon Way 4.98 acres total 2.25 acres wet 2.73 acres dry 2.55 acres dry contiguous 4.19 acres 2.02 acres wet 2.17 acres dry Exhibits:A B C D E F G Application Plat map Property Owner’s list Topo Map Plat of Abingdon Glen Proposed Lot Line Rearrangement Consent Form Application: The applicant owns both lots and would like to change the lot line 60' to the west to have the trees located along the east property line on the 325 South Brown Road property. This lot line will allow the South Brown Road lot to have platted access to the Luce Line Trail. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.28, Subd. 5 (B) RR-IB Standards & Chapter 11 (Subdivision Ordinance) # ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards RR-IB District Standards Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard 2 acres 200'50’50’30’ Subject Property Lot Area and Yards The rearranged lot line will not make either lot non-conforming for lot area or setbacks. The smaller lot, 2150 Abingdon Way, will continue to have two suitable septic sites that can meet the 20* setback requirement from the east property line. STAFF RECOMMENDATION To approve the lot line rearrangement, subject to the property owner providing the following information for filing with Hennepin County: 1. 2. 3. A new 10' drainage easement along the new east property line for 2150 Abingdon Way A consent form for both properties if a mortgage is held on either property A certificate of survey showing the new drainage easement with a signature block with the property owner's signature 4.It would also be helpful if the surveyor would put the following information on the certificate of survey for filing: total lot area total dry acres total wet acres total dry contiguous areas 5. A reduced copy at 1 "=200' for amending the City's section maps U2474 Steve and Susan Wilson 2150 Abingdon Way/325 South Brown Road Lot Line Rearrangement PC-‘April 19. 1999 page~2 ft Application # Date ReceivedO"~ Amount Paid ^ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION , „ ^ . . ., Site address 2!^^ ?roDcrtv Identification Number (PID) 03'~ //7"~ goperty IdentificatiotTNumberfflD) 03'~ 117^'23 OOOG _ Please check one - Property ____abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to appUcation.j|^^^^ f ^ G/SaAJ CCSAJ APPLICANT Name C. Address ^31^ City jL<v< LaJi^ A. Ul Phone (home) OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _____ Zip 5^^s^Phone (work) (UfeiB osiEicr Address City Zip Phone (home) Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units__I Other (specify) PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes X Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) _________ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites ____/ Existing Units n New Units /___Total Units 4"> -- ^ ! II Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per___Acres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) MESIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Pa>inent of fees (refer to "application fees" listed below. 2. Completed application form. 3. Preliminary plat information on Certificate of Survey. 4. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Goa Cente^48-327lD 5. As an addendum to this application, please attach a ^arate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Zoning Official's Signature _______________________________________Date________________________________ MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FINAL APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (refer to Preliminary Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit Zoning Official's Signature ______________________________________Date________________________________ L APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check [X] those which apply) A. Application Base Fees: Totals Sketch Plan Review (Class I, n&m) $250.00 ______ X Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $350.00 _____ Subdivision Application (Class I & n) $350.00 ______ _____Preliminary Sul^vision Application $375.00 + $25.00/lot (Class III & all non-residential) ______ _____Final Plat Application (Class ni) $200.00 ______ _____ Legal Review and Filing: _____Subdivision only $75.(X) ______ _____Subdivision w/easements and covenants min. $200.00 ______ _____ Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) ______ ____Legal and Engineering Review Fees (as incurred) ______ _____Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application $200.(X) (No change from original application) ______ _____Renewal of Class III, Preliminary Subdivision Application $200.(X) (No change from original application) ______ _____ Renewal of Final Class III Subdivision Application $ 150.00 (No change from original application) B. Special Improvement Fees: _____ Proposed Private Roads $600.00 + $.50/lineal ft.;_____lia ft. x .50 •= $______ ______ _____ Proposed Public Roads $9(X).(X) + $.50/lineal ft.;_____lin. ft. x .50 = $_____ ______ _____ Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $900.00 ______ _____ Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.00 + $25/stub ______ _____ Proposed Watermain Extension $250.00 + $25/stub ______ _____ Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) $200.00 ______ _____ On-Site System, Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $50.00/per lot x _____new lots ______ C. Flexible Application Fees/Misc. Fees _____ Variance $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) ______ _____ Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision $ 100.00 ________ _____ PRD Application with Subdivision $30.00/Dwelling Unit ______ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attoraej*. Plaiming Commission and Council necesst^^to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional^f^ established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature _ Date Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City Office 25 days before the Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in }*our place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 0S-H7-ZS-2.'*' f (le) (IT)(t.) s (18) JBUL THnv T rat, tl 03'll?-75-Zt Mr.as (IS)P TBTTr i ! (»g) TTtP 544 tiruuFi (16) if*«4*«rt 340 oi W=tf7=^tJ=Tt I /I n ^ 1 ' «••••«•••* ■ ■ ■ IP. n u7-',o-ty 7^? 05-tl7-«3-l5 ST^ (10) 5tT t< [ • RUN DATE tS/li/99 MTCH 197 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORfUTION SYSTEH PROPERTY OUNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435491 PARE 20 PROP ADOR ORNER KANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR PROP ADOR ORNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR PROP ADOR wmin NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADOR ONNCR NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR PROP ADOR OMNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR PROP A1 OWER Him TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR SO 9S-117-2S IS 9901 99SS9 BROUN RD S U F FARLEY t K 0 FARLEY UlLLIAN I KATHLEEN FARLEY SS9 BROUN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55S5A SO 9S-117-2S IS 9992 09399 BROUN RD S JOHN C DOUTHIT ETAL JOHN C DOUTHIT 399 S BROUN RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 93-117-23 13 9993 99930 ADDRESS UNASSICXIED LONGRIDGE ASSOCIATES LONORIDGE ASSOCIATES 15497 NCGINTY RD U UAYZATA NN 55391 30 93-117-23 13 9995 91995 FOX RIDGE RD ROB HACK RAYHOND H HACK 1995 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 93-117-23 13 9019 91959 FOX RIDGE RD D S PHELPS BED PHELPS DAVID S I ELLEN D PHELPS 1950 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 93-117-23 13 9911 91969 FOX RIDGE RD LUCIA T NORISON LUCIA T NORISON 1969 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 93-117-23 21 9999 00930 ADDRESS UNASSlCmD STATE OF HINN STATE OF NINN CDNRI CLUCE LINE TRAILI 30 93-117-23 21 9919 00930 ADDRESS UNASS16NED UlLLIAN F HARTFIEL JR ET AL UILLlAN F i HELEN C HARTFIEL 2225 DEVIN LA LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 93-117-23 21 0912 02225 DEVIN LA U F HARTFIEL t H C HARTFIEL UlLLIAN F I HELEN C HARTFIEL 2225 DEVIN LA LONG LAKE NN 55356 N!H '\V I J 30 93-117-23 21 9021 99105 BROUN RD S C B J KROGNESS CHARLES B JEAN KROGNESS 105 BROUN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 03-117-23 21 9922 99195 BROUN RD S J E B B A ELDER JANES E B BARBARA A ELDER 195 BROUN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 93-117-23 22 9000 02259 LONGVIEU CIR N F B N V F TORRISON NORNAN F TORRISON 2259 LONGVIEU CIRCLE LONG LAKE NN 55356 NJ » ‘ i CQ SO 93-117-23 23 9900 92255 ABINGDON UAY F B C STINCHFIELD FREDERICK/CHERYL STINCilFlELD 3950 NINNEHAHA CT UAYZATA NN 55391 30 93-117-23 23 9999 92249 ABINGDON UAY N F SUIONTKOUSKI ET AL NARC F SUINOTKOUSKI B BETH E SUIONTKOUSKI 2249 ABINGDON UAY LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 93-117-23 23 9913 99930 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEDf ABINGDON GLEN ASSOC ABINGDON GLEN HNNRS ASSN C/0 RESIDENT OF 2295 2349 ABINGDON UAY LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 93-117-23 24 9003 99325 BROUN RD S C S B S D UlLSON C STEVEN B SUSAN D UlLSON 325 BROUN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55356 SO 93-117-23 24 9994 99030 ADDRESS UNASSI6HED C S B S D UlLSON C STEVEN B SUSAN 0 UlLSON 325 BROUN RD S LONG LAKE NN 55356 SO 93-117-23 24 9995 92295 AB1N600N UAY R B BRUCE B C K BRUCE R B BRUCE B C K BRUCE 2295 ABINGDON UAY LONG LAKE NN 55356 received MAR P 2 1999 cnYu^uf^o,vo RUN DATE ES/IA/W HiiiNEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORHAHON SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST lATCN BR7 PROP ADDR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR SO OS-117-^2 n OtOO 021S0 ARlNNiCN NAY C S 0 S D NIiLtM C STEVEN t SUSAN D NXLSON 525 BRONN RD S LONG LAKE HN 55350 PROP ADDR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR SO 0S-117-2S 20 0000 00205 BRONN RD S ASP KEARNEY XXX ET AL ADRIAN A A PAHEU H KEARNEY 205 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE HN 55S50 . REPORT HO. PXOS5O0X PAGE 29 50 05-117-25 20 0007 02100 ABINGDON WAY T C DEVRIES B 6 W DEVXRES TXH01HY C 0 GAYLE N DEVRIES 2100 ABINGDON WAY LONG LAKE HN 55550 30 05-117-25 20 OOOB 00255 BRONN RD S NARCARET P COST HARGARET P COST 255 9R0NN RD S LONG LAKE HN 55550 TOTAL BATCH 507 00022 X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF XNFORNATXON AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNONLEOGE AND BELIEF. n J \ i I 1 o • Vw’ A-£‘^ » • r^w lof* lll^it- D»L) ^ P (bo'X MOO' h. 32X 5. W. (P r. FROM POPHAM HA(K ET AL IMON)ll. 55'96 I2:lt/5T. 12:IO.‘NO. 57600S6232 P CONSENT Gr The undersigned ("Mortgagee") having an interest as mortgagee in the property described in the foregoing_________(the "________"), pursuant to that certain Mortgage dated_________, 19_, filed__________, 19_with the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota as Document No.______(the “Mortgage”), hereby consents to the subordinate to the__ and further agrees that the Mortgage is subject and granted in the IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Consent to be executed effective as of__________________, 1996. Mortgagee STATE OF COUNTY OF ) ) ) ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on___ ______________the ____________________of ______, on behalf of the _ .. 199^ by j a under the laws of Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFIED BY: AppliGoAV AcedU <|h^ (jki U e«Mr piopciltp olo^ a -Hu Cik|, Tht of •Hi* laf ithc zsiaimiss ii/a»« blociL r>gw dvaia4<|t/aliVVt| £Asemgi«ls, 7 TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Staff RE:#2479 Peter Andrea Co. (Jim Deanovic) • "555'' Stubbs Bay Road North Class III Preliminary Plat Subdivision-Public Hearing Exhibits: A B C D E F G H I Application Plat map Property Owner's list Reduced Survey City Engineer report Assessor's calculation for park dedication January 19, 1999 minutes from sketch plan Survey Septic report memo Zoning: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Comprehensive Plan:Rural Service/Rural Residential Application: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 46.75 acre parcel into seven (7) residential lots in the 5 acre zoning district. U2479 Peter Andrea Co. 555 Stubbs Bay Road Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-1 I • • PARCEL INFORMATION Property Identification: The subdivision includes the following parcels: 32-118-23-24-0007 DESCRIPTION OF AREA The site is bordered by Wayzata Boulevard W. (Hwy 12) on the north, Stubbs Bay Road along the most easterly edge, and residential development on the south and west. TOPOGRAPHY There are several wetlands on die property. The topography of the site varies from elevations of over 1000 to 950. U2479 Peter Andrea Co. 555 Stubbs Bay Road Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-2 LOT INFORMATION The subdivision is proposed as 7 lots on 46.75 acres. Lot Dry Acres Total Acres 1 5.0 acres 6.36 acres 2 5.08 acres 5.08 (non-Orono wetland) 3 5.5 acres south of right-of- way 5.5 (non-Orono wetland) 4 • 5.19 acres 5.27 acres 5 5.50 acres 5.46 acres 6 5.0 acres 6.36 acres 7 5.0 acres 6.8 acres ZONING The parcel is zoned RR-1 A, Rural Residential District. The minimum lot area requirement is five (5) acres. The minimum setback requirements are noted below: Lot Aiea Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Adjacent to Street 5 acres, dry buildable 300’100 ’100 ’50’100’ Wetland Setback No building, excavation, grading or filling is allowed in or within 26' of the wetlands. The wetland setback will apply to lots 5-7. H2479 Peter Andrea Co. SSS Stubbs Bay Road Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-3 J Septic The minimum setback requirements for septic systems is 75* from wetlands, water supply wells and stormwater ponds. No septic reports have been received as of the writing of this staff report. The subdivider's septic • site designer has been in contact with the City's On-Site Septic Systems Manager, Steve Weckman. Staff will attach a septic report as an Exhibit to this report when it is available. The applicant has not provided septic reports to the City for review. Before we can proceed with the application Staff must determine if the septic locations as shown are acceptable. Access The proposed plat shows a private road as Outlot A. The private road would be located off Stubbs Bay Road and end in a cul-de-sac. Our Subdivision Code requires roads to be platted through assuming it will be necessary for future connections to land locked parcels. To be consistent with the intent of the Code it is required the subdivider plat access outlots for future road extensions to die West The proposed interchange for Highway 12 and County Road 6 will make access from the North difificult if not impossible. • A wetland is located in the Northwest corner of proposed Lot 5. Staff is recommending an outlot be platted at 50' for future access to the west. The outlot would be located in Lot 5 to the south side of ^e wetland. Easements 1. 2. 3. A 27' road easement is located along the west property line of proposed Lot 3 and part of proposed Lot 4. Standard drainage and utility easements along the property lines will be required for the final plat. Subdivider shall grant Conservation and Flowage easements across Orono wetlands located over Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7. Park Dedication Fee 8% of the land value, to be determined by the City Assessor, will be required for Park Dedication Fee. H2479 Peter Andrea Co. 555 Stubbs Bc^ Road Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-4 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION The Preliminary Plat shows Outlet A as the proposed private road, but does not provide a means for future connection through the plat to the west. The proposed Lot 3 is accessed by a 50' Outlet B for a private driveway. Private driveways are normally platted at 30* for back lots. The plat shows a proposed rear lot line for right-of- way vdiich may be 'taken' for an interchange. Knowing this, the City should require the lot meet 150% of zoning district requirements as a back lot recognizing the location of the rear lot line after right-of-way acquisition. The lot should meet the following requirements: A. Lot Area = 7.5 acres B. Front Setback = 150' Outlot B is shown through an existing non-Orono wetland. The status of the wetland being . non-Orono does not change the need to mitigate the wetland at 2:1 on site. It is the position of City Staff the wetland not be mitigated if an alternative exists for access to Lot 3. Including extending Outlot A further to the northwest. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will require on site treatment of stormwater. The plat does not show a pond being developed. Conservation and drainage easements will be required over a stormwater pond. The subdivider has not provided information on how a driveway will cross the Orono wetland over Lot 6 between Outlot A and the proposed building site. The subdivider has not provided a wetland delineation report or septic reports. It is not possible to proceed with the application until these items have been reviewed and approved. Lots 4 and 5 would require lot width variances as they do not meet the required 300' width . for the RR-1A (5 acre zoning district) The location of the building pad shown on Lot 5 may be in a location to narrow. The lot requires a lot width variance at the street and the width at the building pad is only about 180' The City will require dedication of a 17' along the west property line of Lot 5 for future right- of-way. 33' had been dedicated along the parcels to the west. U2479 Peter Andrea Co. 55S Stubbs Bay Road Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page-5 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the application be tabled to allow additional time for the subdivider to submit septic and wetland delineation reports. The Planning Commission should also discuss the items listed on page 5 and offer recommendations based on future access to properties located to the west. The Subdivision Ordinance requires developers plat for future access through the subdivision. This plan does not provide for future access. #2479 Peter Andrea Co. JJ5 Stubbs Bay Road Subdivision PC-4/19/99 page—6 Application H cP ^ Date Received^lZZZIZZ- Amount Paid ^ o.<T>. *>« CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION o i 11 Site address Zyh^hhsi. Kci__Cz.----- Property Identification Number (PID) ,^2. *-/y <P — - 2 y ~ 7 Please check one - Property ^ abstract or____torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Name Address llOO F^uiTA6L€ /tlo3 Phone (home) ~ City />yiJ>Ai€ AtA^ ZipWWPhone(work)_2Z£z^fPf J OWNER (ifdifferent than applicant) City //v/z g ^ (attach list if more than one) Zip r/iJ9 Phone (work) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) */2. 9if t Acres Dry Land i Acres Wet Land V<r. yst Acres Total, all parcels X Residential; no. of units ________ Other (specify)______ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) X Subdivision for New Building Sites 2. Existing Units New Units *7 Total Units Number of Building Sites Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) •7 Units per 9^. 7/Acres ^ /IC,_-Sq Ft* Dry BuildableLand ^ Residential Other (specify) n '•'-j •• MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION ,Arr Pa\Tnent of fees (refer to "application fees" listed below. —Completed application form. ^^'■5;^Preliminar>‘ plat infonnation on Certificate of Survey. .^^r^ertified Property Owners List of owmers within 350’ (you must obtain this list from Hennepin Count)- Department of Finance A-603 Gou. Center 348-327 1). 3. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Zoning OStcial’s Signature _____________________________________ Date_______________________________ MESTVIUM hL\TERI AL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FINAL APPLICATION 1. Pax-ment of fees (refer to Preliminary Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit. Zoning OSicial’s Signature_____________________________________Date --------------------------------------------- Totals L APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check [X] those which apply) A. Application Base Fees: _____ Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $250 00 _____ Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $350.00 Subdivision Application (Class I & II) $350.00 y Preliminary Subdivision Application $375.00 + $25 00/lot (Class 111 & all non-residential) Final Plat Application (Class III) $200.00 _____ Legal Review and Filing: _____Subdivision only $75.00 _____Subdivision w/easements and covenants min. $200.00 _____ Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) _____ Legal and Engineering Review Fees (as incurred) Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change from original application) Renewal of Class III, Preliminary Subdivision Application $200 00 (No change from original application) _____ Renewal of Final Class III Subdivision Application $150.00 (No change from original application) B. Special Improvement Fees: >: Proposed Private Roads ^00 00 + $ 50/lineal ft . //^ lin ft. x 50 = %II50 _____ Proposed Public Roads $900.00 + $.50/lineal ft.;______ lin ft x .50 = $_____ _____ Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $900.00 _____ Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.00 $25/stub _____ Proposed Watermain Extension $250.00 + $25/stub Proposed Storm Sewer System (e.xcluding culverts) $200.00 y On-Site System. Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $50 6o/per lot x y new lots C. Flexible Application Fees/Misc. Fees _____ Variance $220 00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) ---------- _____ Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision $100 00 ---------- _____ PRD Application with Subdivision $30 00/Dxvelling Unit ---------- The applicant hereby agri^to/provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer. City Attorn^'. Planning Commission anJ^uncil necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordmance A Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Date 2^ Applicant must have all submittals into the City Office 25 days before the Planning Commission meeting Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetmgs of the Planmng Commission and Council If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in you: place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting I \a Mi • » • '.* • *•* '•*•' ^ '•* * ^ '*****^^ _4r _$r^v/>* ../ / / / ««#••« ••••••««•»•••%• cX<^:-:-Xs::<:v:<';'X:-:<-:;-: [.•.•.•.'.‘.•.%<v/.*.*,*.*.\*,v.*.%*.% fa««aaaaaaaaaaa«««aac««a4I* ••••••##■#•«■•••••••«#I* • ••#••• • • •«€«••••••••• • •*•*• •#«««!•««««• • a 0 m m Bmmmmmm a«««« * •#•«•#•%•«%##§• •# i T • • •«*••«%•»••••••«•• < a • • tm i; y / a • a^a • • a • a^ I •”•*•*•*•*•*•*•*#* a^'a'a***• *•*%*• •*! •*•*•*• a*#*#***#^*'**#*#** a **a a **a a 1. «a ••a*aa»aaaa*aaaaa«a«*««*«*«aaaa*«** at* •a » • «-» V ! X'’ a« <— ^'N • X* • • • • *****»**'%*,*** *•*.*•* *•*•*•*•* *•* ^ |•aaaaaaa•A*•a«••a>• V•>ft^:::xv;’x^x:'S>x-x^1. aaaaa*aaa#caaaaaaaa«aaaaaaaaaa laaaaaaaaaaaa%aa%aa»*aa»aaaaa*« al.aaaa^aaaaaaa^aaaaataaaaaaaaaa****** ___la^aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa«a##«»aa#aa» • > *. i :^:'x'x-:-:-y'r‘:-::^S‘vX:-<v:v:V<<'x‘:':v------ -- ‘•••aa*aa«aaai.«««a*aa#aaaa«aa^ N \X ^-/3 • •aaaataaaaaaaaaaaaaaa«a*aaaaaaaavaaaaa«%aaa aaaa«aaaaaaaa*aaa*aaaaaaaaaaa*aaa_aaaaa«a a a_a a_ m 9 • 9 0 0 0 0 0 • B 0 9 B 0 0 0 0 • 0 9 0 9 0 0 9 B W • 0 * 9 % 0 • B B 0 B 0B W 0 B I ••••». •••««a**a»»«*aaaa«a«aa«a«>a*aa«*aaft***<*««««* - \I ■a«aaaaa«*aaa%aa«a«aaaaaaa*aaa**a*aa«««aa«aaa»**« '- >* |•aaa•aaaaa•aaa•aaaa•a••«aaa•«•aaaaaa«aaaaa Ml•aaa•a•aa•aaaaaaaaa•aaaa••a•a••a*aa%aaaaa Mm ■•aaaaaaaavaav^^aaaaaa^va^aa^aaaaaaaaaa a^S ^ • mW i*aaaa»aaaaaaa v a a^ aaaaaa*aaaaaaa«aa«flaaaaaa 9 0 0 0 % %000%090 0 m 9%%900000%09*00B990900*0*» • ^ 3A-H)f.JLlr Bf — at A\% - iUN DATE E2/11/99 •ATCM SOS fROT AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PRW AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAIK/ADDR 50 29-110-25 55 9000 00050 ADDRESS UNASSX6NED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY 50 29-110-25 59 0009 05000 HAYZATA BLVO H OTTEN NANAGENENT OTTEN NANAGENENT BOX 299 LONO LAKE HN 55556 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY IHFORHATION SVSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 50 29-110-25 55 0009 05960 SIXTH AVE N NORTHERN STATES POWER CO HSP PROPERTY TAX DEPT 919 NICOLLET HALL HPLS HN 55901 50 52-110-25 15 0002 00550 STUBBS BAY RO N R C TAYLOR 0 S SKAY-TAYLOR R C TAYLOR S S SKAY-TAYLOR 550 STUBBS BAY RD N LONO LAKE HN 55556 REPORT NO. PX9S5401 PACE 15 50 29-110-25 59 0000 05740 HAYZATA BLVD W CLIFFORD L OTTEN CLIFFORD L OTTEN P 0 BOX 299 LONO LAKE HN 555S6 50 52-110-25 15 0005 00900 STUBBS BAY RO N TODD H 0 DONNA N CAUSE TODD S DONNA CAUSE 900 STUBBS BAY RD LONO LAKE HN 55556 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAIffi/AOOR PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAf«/AOra PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 50 52-110-25 15 0009 00990 STUBBS BAY RO H FREDERIC P RIEBEL FREDERIC P RIEBEL P 0 BOX 199 LONG LAKE HN 55556 50 52-110-25 21 0006' 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY SO 52-11B-25 22 0005 05025 SIXTH AVE N HICNAEL A ALEXANOER HICHAEL A ALEXANDER S02S 6TH AVE N LONO LAKE HN SS5S6 50 52-110-25 25 0009 00960 ORCHARD PARK RO ROBERT J A LORRAINE E ROOEN ROBERT J I LORRAINE E RODEN 960 ORCHARD PARK RD LONG LAKENH 55556 SO 52-110-25 21 0005 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED S A CIRSPINSKI ETAL CLIFFORD L OTTEN P 0 BOX 299 LONG LAKE HN 55556 50 52-110-25 21 0009 00050 ADDRESS PENDING STEPHEN DAVIS TOWLE STEPHEN DAVIS TOWLE 5115 PINNACLE DR OLDSHAR FL 59677 50 52-110-25 22 0009 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ROBERT T HICKELSEN ETAL JIH WHALEN 19925 50TH AVE N PLYHOUTH HN 55996 50 52-110-25 29 0005 00905 STUBBS BAY RO N R C JOCHinS I 5 J JOCNinS ROBERT 0 STEPHANIE JOCHIHS 90S STUBBS BAY RD N LONG UKE HN 55556 30 32-110-23 21 0005 00605 STUBBS BAY RD N SON KR06HESS STEPHEN H KROGNESS 605 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE HN 55356 30 52-110-25 22 0062 03025 SIXTH AVE H HICHAEL A ALEXANDER HICHAEL A ALEXANDER 3025 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 55556 30 32-110-25 23 0006 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED STEPHEN D TOWLE STEPHEN D TOWLE 5115 PINNACLE OR OLDSHAR FL 39677 30 32-110-25 29 0006 00505 STUBBS BAY RD N K A S 0 K HOLHES ET AL KEVIN A S DIANE K HOLHES 505 STUBBS BAY RO N LONG LAKE HN 55556 Oj ViOD O iUN DATE •i/n/99 lATCN SIS HEM4CPXN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORHATXON SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PX4SE4R1 PACE 14 ADOR OWNER TARPAVER NAfK/AOOR' M SR'UO'tS £4 •••7 •SfRt WATERTOWN RD ORCHARD PARK FARN INC ORCHARD PARK FARN INC S9RR WATERTOWN RD HAPLE PLAIN HN 55S59 SO SE-llO-ES SI tool lists STUDIS DAY RD N PAHEU F ORECORY PAMELA FROST ORECORY C/0 NOLLVBROOK S CO 714 2ND AVC S R4M NPLS NN 55412 SO 52-110-25 SI ills MS55 STUDtS RAY RD N T R SCHUPP t J N SCNUPP TINOTHV R/JEANETTE N SCHUPP S5S STUDDS DAY RD N LONO LAKE HN 55554 -i PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR SO • 32-110-25 S2 0001 0S940 . WATERTOWN RD JEFFREY V NELXN JEFFREY V NELXN S940 WATERTOWN RD NAPLE PLAIN NN SSS59 SO S2-110-2S S2 0005 OStSO WATERTOWN RD S N 0 C A HARRIS STEVEN H HARRIS SOS TURHAN RD HAPLE PLAIN HN S5SS9 SO S2-110-2S 42 0001 00400 STUDDS DAY RD N RICHARD N STUDDS RICHARD N STUDDS 400 STUDDS SAY RD N LONO LAKE NN S5S54 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR TOTAL DATCN 505 00024 . « I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO TK REST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND RELIEF.ELiEr. n PATE ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR PETIiR ANDREA COMPANY M THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 32-118-23 HEN>IEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Bonesuoo. Kosent. Andertik tnd AstociMet, kK. Is *n AffirmMive Actlon/Cqual Opportunity employer ca. Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & iVl 1 Associates Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. P.E. • Joseph C. Anderlik. PE. • Mjrvin L Sorvala. PE. • Richard E. TUmer. PE. • Glenn R Cook. PE. • Rotoeri G. Schunichi. PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. • Robert W. Rosene. PE. and Susan M. Eberlin. C.P.A. Senior Consultants Asiociate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. P£. • Keith A. Cot^n. PE. • Robert R. Pfefferle. PX • Richard W. Foster. PE. • David O. Loskota. PE. • Robert C. Russek. A.I.A. • Mark A. Hanson. PE. • Michael T. Rautmann. PE. • Ted K.Fleid. PE. • Kenneth P. Andersoa PE. • Mark R. Rolfs. PE. • Sidney P Williamson. P£.. LS. • Robert F. Kotsmitn • Agnes M. Ring • Michael P. Rau. PX • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE. Engineers & Architects Offices: St Paul. Rochester. Willmar and St Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl Website: www.bonestroo.com AprU 5.1999 Elizabeth VanZomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Peter Andrea Subdivision File No. 139-2479 Dear Liz: We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed seven-lot subdivision for the Peter Andrea Company. The site is located west of Stubbs Bay Road North and south of TH 12 in the north half of Section 32. We have the foUowing comments in regards to engineering matters. 1. Access: The proposed access location off from Stubbs Bay Road appears accqitable. T^e proposed roadway will need to have a minimum paved width of 28 feet to meet City standards for a public or private street serving 7 or more units. The proposed cul-de-sac is approximately 1100 feet long where City standards allow for a maximum cul-de-sac length of 1000 feet. The plans should be reviewed for any conflicts with the future realignment of T.H. 12. The developer should be aware that the City will reconstruct Stubbs Bay Road this summer and eliminate the at grade railroad crossing and the existing access at T.H. 12. There is a need for a future cast west roadway bttween Stubbs Bay Road and Orchard Park Road. It makes sense at this lime to make provisions for a future westerly extension of the proposed roadway serving this property. City staff should research and further review possible aUgnments for a future westerly roadway extension prior to preliminary plat approval. It may make sense to dedicate 33 feel of right-of-way along some or ail of the west boundary of the parcel. Thirty-three feet of right-of-way currently exists west of the west property bouiM-iy. Thirty-three feet of right-of-way also exists from the southwest comer of this parcel to Orchard Park Road. Final plans should include geotechnical reccmmendations aiuJ street design including horizontal and vertical curve information. 2. Grading: A grading and erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review. It appears that driveway and sfreet construction will require some wetland filling. Driveway locations should be shown and wetland impacts identified on the final plan set. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any grading, particularly along the wetlands. AddiUonal erosion control will be needed during construcUon of the houses and septic systems. 3. Drainage: The draft version of the City ’s’ Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shows that the site lies within two major drainage districts. The northerly and southerly portions of the site flow to the west and lie within the Painters Creek drainage district. Final plans should include water quality provisions for storm water leaving the northerly and southerly portions of the site. The central portion of the site flows easterly and lies within the Lake Classen drainage disu^ict. The receiving water body for the Lake Classen portion of the site is a wetland Identified as LC-C-32 in the SWMP. The weUand is located E 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul. MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1311 r on the east side of Stubbs Bay Road and is classified as being highly suscq>tible to storm water fiows. A water quality pond should be constructed on Lot 1 or Lot 7 to treat water fi-om the site prior to discharging into wetland LC-C-32. A drainage area map. storm sewer and ponding calculations should be provided with the final plan set Final plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their review. 4. Easements: Final platting should include 33 feet of dedicated right-of-way for Stubbs Bay Road. Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of -ways. Drainage easements should be provided across all wetland, drainage way and pond areas. 5. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we will prepare an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. Please contact me at 651-604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSCX:iATES. INC. /c^ Tom Kellogg Cc: Gr^ Gappa, City of Orono § ! Os ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS Si ^ ^ ® *" ® cuWe-sac. She said ail of the proposed building pads Marie Gronberg and Jim Deanovic were present. '0* where Highway 12 is proposed to run. Outlot B is the pro^ northern most lot. He said there Is a platted road that rons along the west side of undeveloped lots to the west of the proposed loS!^s^mh2wv^^-I!l^^ proposed subdivision and the undevelopedlots was probably i.itended to provide the access or they could gain access from Orchard Park Road. remalnsIn^thl^Sn P'®" ®® '®"fl ®® 'f’® P'®«®«* «>ad along the west side Lindquist stated that he Is comfortable with the plan. McMillan said she Is also comfortable with the plan. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS commission REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETINGS ON NOVEMBER 23,1998, DECEMBER 14,1998, AND JANUARY 11,1999 are ilssuM^ ttiraweS reviewed the Rebers/Service 800 application and there *^®! Mn^OT had given preliminary approval to the access as a quick right turn, CommSon m^^^^ ^ published schedule of Council members who will attend the Planning City has ask^ for an extension to provide an updated Comprehensive Plan to CornpreK?^^ Planning Commission will be Involved In updating the pfan^She «?/<hll®«c ‘l® ^®''®*'"9 completing the ComprehensivePlan. She said she Is not sure how the Planning Commission members will be involved. ,?e ComprX^iJe Page 16 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 ^2451 LYLE AND GRETCHEN SHAW, 17S0 SHADYWOOD ROAD - ConSnuad Roetofs statod that the application was written as though it was for a garage. He explained the current floor plan of the house. ^ II*® desire for extra living space or the desire for garage space steered the Roeiofs said they go hand in hand. The applicants want to bring a garage to the lot and expand the house. They want to keep the house as contiguous as possible. He said the addition is entirely behind the setback line. Roeiofs reviewed the sizes of the neighboring houses. He said they would like some direction from the Planning Commission members before making further plans. Stoddard said he would like to see the hardcover scaled back. He asked what the hardcover would be if the structural coverage was brought down to 15%. McMillan said the applicartts are allowed a minimum of 1,500 feet of structural coverage and that would automatically trigger additional hardcover. She said that 15% structure coverage would be 1,565 square feet and the applicants are proposing 1,650 square feet. She said she could approve the application if the stnictural coverage was reduced to 1,565 square feet. Roeiofs said that would mean a reduction In building mass of 85 square feet He said they did consider making the garage shorter, but it doesn't reduce hardcover because the driveway wouid be ionger. McMillan said she believes that structural coverage Is more important than hardcover and 1,565 square feet would be very close to the allowed 1,500 square feet of structural coverage. Lindquist and Smith agreed with McMillan. There were no public comments. Lindquist asked if Roelofe was comfortable with reducing the stnjctural coverage to 15%. Roeiofs said he believes they can work It out. McMillan moved, Smith seconded, a motion to approve Application #2461, Lyle and Gretchen Shaw, 1760 Shadywood Road, for a hardcover variance in the 76'-260* lakeshore setback with the condition that prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant provide a drainage plan that would be acceptable to City Staff. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 16 1 \ Ilif'liil 1>I ! * aUW y,^ , C^UJ^^A qao/ ,-i-'—i'V .-'-:'-:~tB, 'i- *H A' ----^ 'A % '\ l''4 I/! A/fi^ 4|«*/ \; '•• \vi....c^ r J ^ • " ■•* ■'Jh- ^'' ■^\>>«> ' s'.') I ' •.'/.V •• ! \ 'I a’<* ' [. • •' •* •.’•] ■ ‘ '• 1 = 4 ' ■ / • ■ *^ n J-.L.^,—‘-V** , 6V /'N j-yO) i /'i ^ ■ ' '■ n J..—v--».v. V. CD N \ §J I 'n 15 .'.41 < '/. / •.\r. • jlJL_o_i Swn-D AU I * I W h CC?cd <^>3-9c>s z Oo mfOT, 0-k>0 • • Application Date: 3-25-99 Application Complete Date: 4-1-99 60-Day Action Deadiine Date: 6-1-99 To: From: Date: Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaf&on, Senior Planning Coordinator April 15,1999 Subject: #2480 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Preliminary Plat List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Preliminary Plat Drawings E - Excerpt from CUP Resolution No. 3902 F - Subdivision Code Section 11.40 - Road Dedication and Reservations G - C & F Easement Vacation Sketch Easement Dedication Primary Reason for Plat Spring Hill Golf Club was issued a CUP in May 1997. One of the conditions of approval was that Spring Hill would formally grant Conservation and Flowage Easements to the City over the various wetlands and drainageways on the property. It was determined that this could be most effectively done after the approved wetland alterations and drainageway reroutings were completed, to ensure accurate legal descriptions. Due to the sheer number of wetlands and drainageways, and the complexity of their descriptions. Spring has chosen to dedicate these easement areas on a plat, which staff agrees is superior to multiple pages of lengthy legal descriptions. The request also includes the vacation of two pre-existing conservation and flowage casements which will be replaced by larger easements. The two being vacated are just north of Spring Hill Road and slightly west of the intersection of Spring Hill and East Long Lake Road (sec Exhibit G). Two Outlets Proposed At the time the application was submitted it was determined that the original preliminary plat drawings did not include a portion of the property located south of Spring Hill Road west of East Long Lake Road. This portion is part of a tax parcel located north of Spring ffill Road, and therefore will become part of the plat. This area and one other portion of the site that is north of County Road 6 and just west of Hunter Drive, will be platted as outlots. The revised preliminary plat drawings incorporate Outlot B (see Exhibit D). #2480 - Spring Hill - Prelim. Plat April 15,1999 Page 2 As outlets, these disconnected parcels will be assigned separate PINS numbers, and it will then be possible for the Club to sell them to adjacent property owners should the Club choose to do so. Neither outlet is buildable, and the final plat approval resolution will clearly identify this fact. Portion of Lot 1, Block 1 in Medina The northern half of Lot 1, Block 1, is in Medina. The applicant is advised to contact Medina to determine whether separate plat approval action by the Medina City Council is required. Right-Of-Way Widths County Road 6 Because the property abuts County Road 6, Hennepin County has been advised of this application and has been requested to comment on it. Staff anticipates a County request for additional right-of way. This stretch of County Road 6 is designated on the Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan as a "Bikeway", which under the County plan could require a total of 100* of right-of-way where only 80' now exists. Orono's 1980 Comprehensive Plan defines County Road 6 as a 'minor arterial' roadway requiring a minimum right-of-way width of 80'. Dave Zetterstrom of Hennepin County has verbally indicated the County will formally request an additional 10' on either side of County Road 6. City policy prior to approximately 1980 was to honor such requests, as evidenced by a number of plats that occurred in the 1970's. However, during the 1980's and 1990's the City generally only approved the County's additional right-of-way requests when they were in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan minimums, or where planned County Road improvements were pending that required added right-of-way. The City's apparent policy was to not burden our property owners with uncompensated loss of land to right-of-ways that weren't clearly needed. The 1997 Hennepin County Bikeway Plan established a policy that requires 100% City funding of right-of-way acquisitions when the right-of-way initially requested by the County during plat review was declined by the City. Otherwise, the right-of-way funding formula is 50% City, 50% County. Orono Subdivision Code Section 11.40 Subd. 2 states: "...when the Comprehensive Municipal Plan or some other agency indicates plans for realignment or widening a road that would require use of some of the land in the subdivision, the subdivider shall be required to improve and dedicate at his expense such areas for widening or realignment of such roads...." » f • • #2480 - Spring Hill - Prelim. Plat April 15,1999 Pages WTiether added right-of-way for future bikeways falls within the definition of "widening or realignment of roads" is unclear. The City should review its right-of-way policy regarding subdivisions abutting a designated County bikeway route. City Roads The plat drawings submitted do not show the actual paved/traveled surface of Spring Hill Road, but the earlier site plans reviewed during the CUP process suggested that the road is more or less centered within its 66'+ right-of-way. The dedications for Spring Hill Road, Tamarack Drive and Hunter Drive appear to be appopriate subject to final acceptance by the Public Services Director and City Engineer. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed plat subject to: 1.Creation of Outlots A and B as unbuildable property outside the intended Club boundaries; ownership of such outlots may be transferred only to an owner of adjacent land and only when legally combined with that adjacent land. 2.Dedication of rights-of-way for Spring Hill Road, Tamarack Drive and Hunter Drive as sho- m, subject to confirmation by Public Services Director and City Engineer that no other City right-of-ways are needed to accomodate existing City roads. 3.Submittal of a revised plat drawing prior to Council review, showing the wetland on Outlet B (wetland boundary’ scheduled to be surveyed April 20). 4.Request Council direction as to County request for additional right-of-way along County Road 6 portions of the plat. 5.Execution of a conservation and flovvage easement over all wetlands shown on the plat, and vacation of the existing easements at the south end of the site. Options for Action 1. Recommend approval per staff recommendation. 2. Table for further information (specify). 3. Recommend denial (state reasons). 4. Other. A Application # ^ Date Received" ^rS^79 Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address ^12^ (/p ^__________ Property Identification Number (PID) 1 3S ““ Please check one - Property abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application. 14.V^ <^tOU=- ^UUS__________________ Address 774r<^A0vrrY lZe>f^ (a___________Phone (home) 12 ■ 4’"7i> ■ 467S~" City _______________________Zipgaj^Phone (work) MZ^fiiZrO'S74' OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ______ Address City__Zip Phone (home) Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use Present Zoning District Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_____ xjg535;5 ■i) PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes _________ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) _________ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites _________Existing Units _________New Units Total Uruts •* • * 3 \ Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per___Acres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE PRELCVnNARY APPUCATION 1. P^qnnent of fees (refer to *appIicatioo fees* listed below. 2. Completed application form. 3. Preliminaiy plat information on Certificate of Surv^. 4. Certified Properly Owners List of owners within SSO* 0^ must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 5. As an addendum to this application, please attach a ^arate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Zoning Official's Signature ______________________________________Date MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FINAL APPUCATION 1. Payment of fees (refer to Preliminaiy Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of fomxal plat 3. Title opinion. . . 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit Zoning Official’s Signature ______________________________________Date^________________________________ L APPUCATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check pC] those which apply) A. Application Base Fees: _____ Sketch Plan Review (Class I, n&in)S2SO.OO ' • • ’ Subdivision ofa Lot Line R«UTangementS3S0.00 ■ * . Subdivision ^plication (Class I & II) S3S0.(X) Preliminary Subdivision Application S37S.00 + S2S.00/Iot (Class m & all non-restdential) Final Plat ^plication (Class HI) S200.00 Legal Review and Filing: _____Subdivision only S75.00 _____Subdivision w/easements and covenants mia S200.00 Paric Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) Legal and ^gineering Review Fees (as incurred) Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application S200.00 (No change from original appIicaUon) Renewal of Class III, Preliminary Subdivision Application S200.00 (No change from original application) Renewal of Final Class in Subdivision Application $ 1 SO.OO (No change from original application) Totals B. Special Improvement Fees: _____ Proposed Private Roads S600.00 + $.50/lineal ft; _____ Proposed Public Roads S900.00 + S.SO/lineal ft;. lia ft X .50 » $ ’lin. ft. X .50 » $ ■ _____Requestfor Ci^ to Accept Existing Private Road S900.00 ______ _____ Prx^rosed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.00 + S25/st(ib _____ Proposed Watermain Extension $250.00'i-S25/stub ______ _____ Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) $200.00 ______ _____ On-Site System, Site Ev^uation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $50.00/per lot x_____new lots ______ C. Flexible Application Fees/Mbe. Fees _____ Variance $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) ______ _____ Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision $100.00 ______ _____ PRD Application with Subdivision $30.00/Dwelling Unit ______ The applicant hereby agrees to provide^l information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Co^iU^l^^ary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the Ci^ Office 25 days before the Planning Commissirr. luwcong. Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Plaiming Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make anangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. > • *i H + 9iM - «-Z-liiipiPii»T %• » ___ • 1 m I.*.*,•.•. S>X*i ’.w.v*x-x-«-x-: .... .v>< *•*i^********** .... • • •• »•••••«• • ••t •»«••••»• ••• »•«••••• X'X-x-x-:';-;-:-;; •.‘.v.'.v * « « • • • #•% • * • • •>X*Xv • • « • • AV.V.*. • % » ft \ •v.’.v.*.;y.\^yy • • 0 $ • -.v.’.'.sf • »#••• H • •••••• ••••• » •4 > ••• .% • %•••••«« r^« ft • ••••••«••••»imm* i ••««•••••• « A ft ft ft%«*ftft«ftft«ft%ft*« - iir^ ...... :;;;x;xv:;x;;;x;x.;:x?;x:xx::;;v.::>;vx Wt’SSSRife ftftft^ftftftft^ *•*• % •*w*ft*«*ft*’ W< • •••••ft^ftft •■#•••%••••••««•••> • ft ft • ft ft^ ft< ftftftftftft* ft ft ftftftftftftftft %J —a • •••««• »#••••• ftZvft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft % j ^ • ft • ft^9 ■ ft ft ft ft ft • ft 4i \ r I ftVi ‘^rtr ^ft d.-4--C4 lUN DATE OSi^t/99 NENNEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OtMERS LIST REPORT NO. PMS5401 PACE 1 BATCH 501 PROP AOOR OMNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR SB 2S>11B*2S 31 0002 OOOSa ADDRESS UNASSXCNEO SPRXNO HXLL 60LF CLUB SPRING HXLL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRXNO HILL RO WAYZATA HM 55391 . 30 25-110-23 31 0007 PROP AODR 00445 HUNTER PASS ONNER NAHE N A AND L J SCHNEIDER TAXPAYER . HILLXAH AND LINDA SCHNEIDER NAME/ADDR 14405 4SRD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55444 PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 25-118-23 32 0003 00700 SIXTH AVE N BRUCE N STEINER TRUSTEE BRUCE N STEINER 700 SIXTH AVE N HAYZATA MM 55391 PROP AODR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR SB 25-11B-2S 34 0002 00445 SPRXNO HXLL RD HAS STOKER JR HARRY B STOKER 445 SPRXNO HXLL RO HAYZATA MN 55591 PROP AODR OWCR NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 25-110>23 34 0004 00541 NORTH STREAM RO JIN LAZEAR JONATHON 8 MENOY LAZEAR 541 NORTH STREAM RD HAYZATA MM 55391 PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 25>118-23 34 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSXCNEO BRUCE N CARLSON ET AL BRUCE H 8 CAROLINE C CARLSON 591 NORTH STREAM ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 25-118-23 31 0004 01125 HUNTER DR C R 8 K H PERRY CHRISTOPHER R/KELLY H PERRY 1125 HUNTER DR HAYZATA MN 55391 38 25-118-23 31 0008 00425 HUNTER PASS S A AND H H HELLRUNG STEPHEN 8 HARGARET HELLRUNG X THE PXLLSBURY COMPANY 200 S 4TH ST HS404S MPLS MN 55402-1444 38 25-118-23 33 0003 00425 SPRING HILL RD V Z 8 E T HAHN VAN ZANDT 8 ELIZABETH T HAHN 425 SPRING HILL RO HAYZATA MN 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0003 00445 SPRING HXLL RO R J NXGON 8 H E NXCON RICHARD J 8 HARY E NXGON 445 SPRING HXLL RO HAYZATA MN 55591 38 25-118-23 34 0007 00521 NORTH STREAM RD 0 L 8 S L HOFFMAN G L HOFFMAN 521 NORTH STREAM RO HAYZATA MN 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0010 00038 ADDRESS UNASSXCNED BRUCE N CARLSON ET AL BRUCE M 8 CAROLINE C CARLSON 591 NORTH STREAM ROAD HAYZATA MM 55391 38 25-118-23 31 0004 00525 HUNTER PASS H D 8 S R STROBEL HARK D 8 SUSAN R STROBEL 1434 DEERHOOD PATH EAGAN HN 55122 38 25-118-23 32 0002 00038 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED BRUCE H 8 JULIE J STEINER BRUCE H 8 JULIE J STEINER 144 EDOEHOOD AVE S HAYZATA HN 55391 38 25-118-23 33 0004 00725 SIXTH AVE N SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 STRING HXLL RO HAYZATA MM 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0004 00591 NORTH STREAM RD BSC CARLSON BRUCE N 8 CAROLINE C CARLSON 591 NORTH STREAM RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0008 00531 NORTH STREAM RO G L HOFFMAN SSL HOFFMAN G L 8 SUSAN HOFFHAN 521 NORTH STREAM RO HAYZATA MN 55391 38 25-118-23 41 0001 00300 SIXTH AVE N DOUGLAS DAYTON ETAL DOUGLAS J DAYTON 300 CO RO NO 4 HAYZATA HN 55391 RUN DATE OS/St/99 MTCH 501 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATXOH SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PMS5401 PACE 2 PROP ADDR OWNER NAW TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 58 25-118-25 AS 0005 005SS HOLLANDER RD Q C 8 N H VACEK CARY C 8 NARY H VACEX SS5 HOLLANDER RD WAYZATA MH 55591 58 25-118-25 45 0008 00545 SPRING HILL RD JULIE A FELDNANN JULIE A FELDNANN 545 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55591 38 25-118-25 45 0009 00555 HOLLANDER RD W W ERICKSON 8 N D ERICKSON WALTER W 8 NANCY D ERICKSON 535 HOLLANDER RD WAYZATA HN 55591 PROP ADDR OWNER NAI« TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 28-118-25 51 0001 00058 ADDRESS UNASSICNED JOHN E SCHUETT 8 WIFE JOHN E SCHUETT 1205 TANARACK DR LONG LAKE HN 55558 58 28-118-25 51 0002 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DUNCAN N DAYTON DUNCAN N DAYTON 445 E LAKE ST STE 220 WAYZATA NN 55591 58 28-118-25 51 0007 01111 TANARACK- DR S L 8 C A BRENNAN SIDNEY L BRENNAN JR 17105 24TH AVE N PLYHOUTH NN 55447 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 28-118-25 51 0008 01099 TANARACK DR CHARLES C DUNNAVAH CHARLES C DUNNAVAH 1099 TANARACK DR LONG LAKE NN 55558 58 28-118-25 51 0009 01085 TANARACK DR SOL PETERSON STEPHEN C PETERSON 1085 TANARACK DR LONG LAKE HN 55558 58 28-118-25 54 0005 01135 SIXTH AVE N E W 8 H S SPENCER EDSON W 8 HARRIET S SPENCER 1155 SPRING HILL RD LONG LAKE NN 55558 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 28-118-25 41 0002 00058 ADDRESS UNASSICNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA NN 55591 58 28-118-25 41 0005 01101 WILLOWBROOK DR D W 8 L E BRUESKE DERALD 8 LOIS BRUESKE 1101 WILLOWBROOK DR ORONO HN 55391 58 28-118-25 41 0004 01175 WILLOWBROOK DR R C 8 S K KRUEGER RICHARD C 8 SUSAN K KRUEGER 1175 WILLOWBROOK DR WAYZATA NN 55591 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 58 28-118-25 41 0008 00058 ADDRESS UNASSICNED D W 8 L E BRUESKE DERALD 8 LOIS BRUESKE 1101 WILLOWBROOK DR ORONO NN 55591 58 28-118-25 41 0007 01150 WYNDHERE RD KERN N HOPPE KERN N HOPPE 1150 WYNDEHERE RD WAYZATA NN 55591 0008 RD 58 28-118-25 41 01180 WYNDHERE Y 8 Y KIN VOUNGKI 8 YOUNGSUN KIN 1180 WYWHERE RD WAYZATA NN 55591 PROP ADDR OWmR NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 28-118-25 41 0009 01185 WYNDHERE RO R V NASON 8 H J NASON RONALD V 8 NARTHA J NASON 1185 WYNDHERE RD WAYZATA NN 55591 58 28-118-25 41 0010 01185 WYNDHERE RD B K HONG 8 K K HONG BACK K HONG 1185 WYNDHERE RD WAYZATA NN 55591 58 28-118-25 41 0011 01145 WYNDHERE RD RESOURCE BANK/TRUST CO TRSTE SUZANNE H JACKSON 1145 WYNDHERE RO WAYZATA NN 55591 '• i RUN DATE 13/30/99 ■ATCH SOI HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PZ955A01 PACE 3 PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 26-118-23 41 0812 00038 ADDRESS UNASSZCNED KERN H HOPPE KERN HOPPE 1150 HVNDNERE RD WAYZATA HN 55391 . 38 26-118-23 42 0002 00038 ADDRESS UNASSI6NED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA m 55391 38 26-118-23 42 0003 00038 ADDRESS UNASSZCNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 38 26-118-23 42 0004 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 26-118-23 42 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSZCNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 26-118-23 43 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSZGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA KN 55391 PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 26-118-23 43 0004 01125 SPRING HILL RD 0 R RICHARD 8 E A RICHARD DAVID I ETHEL RICHARD 1125 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 26-118-23 43 0005 01025 SPRING HILL RD H B 8 C BROOKS TRUSTEES HARNEY B 8 CONLEY BROOKS 400 BAKER BLOG HPLS HN 55402 38 26-118-23 44 0002 00951 SPRING HILL RD W D DUNLAP JR 8 L H DUNLAP WILLIAM D DUNLAP JR 951 SPRING HILL ROAD WAYZATA HN 55391 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 26-118-23.44 0003 00860 SPRING HILL RD SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 26-118-23 44 0004 00038 ADDRESS UNASSZCNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 35-118-23 11 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSZGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 • ri PROP ADDR OWNER NAt« TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 36-118-23 22 0003 00755 SPRING HILL RD F WINSTON 8 E C WINSTON FREDERICK WINSTON 765 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 80 26-118-23 12 0006 01422 TAMARACK DR MICHAEL 0 HOFKZN AND WIFE MICHAEL G HOFKZN 1422 TAMARACK OR LONG LAKE HN 55356 80 26-118-23 12 0007 00080 ADDRESS UNASSZGNED JOHN 'T t JOAN L LEEDS GAIL N KNAPPENBERGER 1420 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 80 26-118-23 13 0001 01382 TAMARACK DR S E HOYT 8 N T SAMUELS SETH E HOYT 1382 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 80 26-118-23 IS 0002 00080 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 80 26-118-23 14 0001 01225 WZLLOWBROOK DR ELAINE H HOULTON *LAXNE H HOULTON tTj WZLLOWBROOK DR WA '^iTA HN 55391 RUN DATE 0S/St/9f BATCH 501 KCNNEriN COUNTY PROPERTY ZNFORNATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI4S5401 PAGE 4 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR B0 24*115-23 14 0002 01275 WILLOWBROOK DR ROBERT K LEEDS ROBERT X LEEDS 1275 WZLLOWBROOICE DR WAY2ATA NN 55301 . 80 24-115-23 14 0003 01300 WILLOWBROOK DR C I H ALSHOUSE CRAIG I NARY ALSHOUSE 1300 WILLOWBROOK DR WAYZATA NN 55391 50 24-115-23 21 0003 01425 TAMARACK DR N i K VON BLUECNER NAX VON BLUECNER 1425 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE NN 55354 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 50 24-115-23 24 0001 01325 TAMARACK DR G A 5 S J SCNWALBACH G A I S J SCNWALBACH 1325 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE NN 55354 . 50 24-115-23 24 0003 01205 TAMARACK DR JOHN E SCHUETT ETAL JOHN E SCHUETT 1205 TAMARACK RD LONG LAKE MINN 55354 50 24-115-23 24 0004 01255 TAMARACK DR R B N BAKER RANDAL W BAKER 1255 TAMARACK DRIVE LONG LAKE NN 55354 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 501 00040 f 38 755 36 118 23 22 0003 SPRING HILL RD F WINSTON & EC WINSTON FREDERICK WINSTON 765 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA MN 55391 Oi • • 4 1 * i I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION# TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.ELIEF. n DATE-^-^/- » ' / ^ or SfC 2* Jsrv I " 'f A hi A lf~^ fT —--~ s jy-'T ~ —»»#».«— I I ■\ >j*aj O ltl¥g 0 R ! yc - —— J jT -r JUfl/- -------'2562.9?---------~~y 1 ( -I’I /" '"-^ //■ 4 K^lHi -'J \ f / fl I- '/.S------Z.-^.X-Tj^ ,| §fiOi -K I I * § \ r- • '^ R8 \ > I I / T^jhhpjto s otut -:h t ...*•■ %f f •i • • • V / X :- $51 iN -'Iflroft w' £■ r /I yv ^ if: / \ Oi I;?5 fliiE •\Il l _ ^i::. i t i»7sn%^l ' ”0 * // — I ■’• • r - -__/1 5 r ( t 0) "0 3D O z r" D O Tl O cm h i S ■ O :d Ji 0 m 'J?.- I7 \'>'^\ ''Sv? \\ r»<»^ ^“' ='■” ^MjnasnMr ;3{?^ _____ J______—l’ ' Ia oenr%r # i \ ^ • i -—y ;-' i ‘ —y-t-^ ttsT f>» ^ ' ' \ r- \ . Of Si*^ ^ -i ) I «k C'-'i Ss i \' 1 f : \' i' I \ 1 ■ t /j I \ *~3S?£ tio ' ISsr^ ^ '''♦ '=»■ ^'/ ■ j i'T/—ri l?'i /'! 1J -/ ^ \ \ \ VU ' V 'A'K 1 I • I I iJM* /■c ti!!- - I o , |5I SI n 0 1 I »* g ills o«__o i. CO ■oz D z D O T1 o cn o Ji o jO :o -H OO 8., ?t:. H il IffC} (/)2m *"o ®>!=!i X OSu? m «• i3 CO 30 D Z n D O ■n O cw s»•sr N I j •»••• *./. .•s 5 N !5 k V- o JO CO "0z z Q D O I \ Tl ^------ *8 "Si: *5 St * N A \ \ \ 1 \ l[!l -- ns.»mIs o^ in .' ® t i 'If* ~m I !fii I- I I f|n i: I I I I L j. r I ijg$ mo I \ O cw V- I %• i :• t \ i \ I I I f I / r / \ \ 'tAJ si. •»> I (/) Qm r- 2 .o Sm 2 ^ CO 31 Z D Z D O F" T1 O ca III »v **•3* ^ • • X •* -^^'' “ J, V''" II 8 1-o 1 1 c* 1 1 1 L 1 .L f -h 1 1 H* 1 T 1 o I--” o 1 J zt -H ?s I • ^f»i. • • Si . r S5S»/ - • •** ;Vi a A 0____-----------------A' C. V’F/l/—■ -- • tm0p2*‘0J' 1-622. tB \ / / \ I ‘<9"^ r M />i—^-r /^svotMNnr or n^r ✓ f€ f/4 or n€ u $/4 or src. H ^n\\ s:rBumr Of n€ t€ i/# / /*• >r s£ %/4 or uc. H :r or jnt AT f/# or 1t€^ t/4 or sfc I '<‘^y ^ imr or eon to- . SIC H "^9/1* \n f\\ . i'/^' ,-./-^j K* L, /\ JLrJf^.to / /ilpi iXhl •“i COSiSoga m L', \ K t‘‘' \isl5 “* // ?-i*« .tV' ^ -------------------------- j H®)- § § 1.- i<{ «i »?r- gp. ii S ■ I I u g I (0 "V 30 O X oo ■n o c D 1-O 1 «» 1 0 1 1 t 1 -L-l- 1 1 tT ou 1 ivP I S o ;q # -i 4 i 3 N Cb ^ l> / '*5b2 II M Iki (A 9m Stqm 3^3 orr X!.A: iM€ Of mmtn pass I mm 8 Cb>. '4'vsT I -r-«®r/,r or »C 4T »/»<v „ yv«rac« or «vf 1^/ 4 jy ^ ''RS?\K X '^'"' I . I H 0 ’^'^'J ’sa^ \ ’ 1 1 •■>- I it *• ••* '§ * V* T **** '•*■ OOV7 iOf4 xfc S .l®d* -nOVirtg^ JIS 11^ - k-. CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO._i902_ 4. 11. 111. attached hereto as Exhibit B-12. Use of Best Management Practices for erosion control during construction, including but not limited to use of silt fencing and erosion control blankets where slopes exceed 3:1. Any retaining walls exceeding 4' in height must have an engineered design, which shall be approved prior to issuance of the site grading permit. 11. C. WETLAND ALTERATIONS. Wetland alterations are approved as shown in attached Exhibits B6 through B-12, subject to the required buffer widths as shown in said Exhibit, and subject to the following conditions: i. Use of Best Management Practices for erosion control during construction. . Wetland mitigation is subject to approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as Orono's LGU for administn’tion of tiie Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland alterations are also subject to Corps of Engineers Section 404 Clean Water Act requirements. Conservation and Flowage Easements shall be granted to the City over all City-protected wetlands (as modified). Applicant shall grant to the City a Conservation and Flowage Easement over the wetland portion of the Club-owned property on the south side of Spring Hill Road west of East Long Lake Road. 4 111. IV. V. FOREST IMPACT MINIMIZATION. Minimization of impacts to the Big Woods portion of the property, as well as to other forested areas of the property, shall adhere to the following general requirements: A. Wetland buffers shall be maximized to the greatest extent possible in forest areas to protect the wildlife habitat value of the site and maintain the connectivity between the wetland and forest communities. B. Runoff or accidental application of fertilizers to forest and wetland areas shall be avoided. Final landscapmg and grading plans shall be designed subject to City approval, where not limited by topography of the site, to divert runoff from these areas to the Page 9 of 17 I during :ing and gineered I grading ks shown min said 1 during tia Creek Wetland ction404 the City Flowage rtyonthe ad Is portion foUowing S 11.40 SBC. 11.40. ROAD DEDICATION AND RESERVATIONS. New Perimeter Streets. Street systems in new subdivisions ^shall be laid out so as to eliminate or avoid new perimeter half-streets. Where an existing half-street is adjacent to a new subdivision, the other half of the street shall be improved and dedicated by the subdivider. The City may authorize a new perimeter street where the subdivider improves and dedicates ® street right-of-way width within his own subdivision boundaries. Widening and Realignment of Existing Roads. Where a subdivision borders an existing narrow road or when the Comprehensive Municipal Plan or some other agency indicates plans or widening a road that would require use of some or the land in the subdivision, the subdivider shall be required to improve and dedicate at his expense such areas for widening or ^®®ii9*'*®ent of such roads. Such frontage roads and streets shall be improved and dedicated by the subdivider at his own expense to the full width as required by this Chapter. Subd. 3. Land reserved for any road purposes may not be counted in satisfying yard or area requirements of the Zoning Chapter whether the land is to be dedicated to the City in fee simple or an easement is granted to the City. ; in forest r between ireas shall approval, ias to iht 9 TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: SUBJECT: April 13,1999 #24‘3^ Matthew B. Herman 3825 Cherry Avenue Variance X Zoning District: LR-1C Lot Area:31,767 One Feimily Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 Acre) square feet (.73 acre)_______________________ Application: The applicant has requested a variance to permit the construction of a 263’ by 4' catwalk across an undeveloped City right-of-way (Cherry Avenue) and across a wetland to gain access to North Arm of Lake Minnetonka. A variance is required because we do not allow structures to be placed within a wetland. In 1990 the City Council granted a similar approval for a previous property owner, but the structure was never built. The applicant will be required to obtain necessary permits for the work proposed. The DNR has stated a new "work in bed of public water permit" is required as they do expire after five years. A variance from the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District may also be required. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (3) (B) The 1990 approval granted a variance to permit a dock to be located on a lot without a principal structure. At that time lakeshore access lots had recently been purchased and not legally combined. Later all five lots were combined. A variance to this section of the code is not required for approval. Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 The 263’ length dock will encroach the wetlands area located above the 929.4' elevation and is located within 75’ of the defined lakeshore at the 929.4’ elevation. The total dock consists of 1,052 s.f. of hardcover, much of which is located at or below the 929.4’ elevation. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District may require additional approvals and/or a variance to permit such a structure. The total hardcover in the 250-500 ’ lakeshore setback would be 3,000 s.f. 1 he property is allowed 6,954.9 s.f. or 30% of the total area. U2472 Sandra Larson 540 Orcno Orchard Road Variance 4/19/99 Page I ANALYSIS The majority of the dock will be constructed within Lot 2 and unimproved portions of Cherry Avenue connecting to the applicant's lot. The dock will be 4* wide and 263* in length. Although the applicant has referred to the dock as a permanent dock, it will not be constructed with pilings. The plans reveal the posts placed every 8'. The plans do not indicate the clearance over the 929.4' waterline. The plan shows the location of the dock to be at least 10' fro'.i adjacent property lines, therefore, meeting required setbacks for accessory structures. The dock should be fully reviewed by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District to ensure compliance with their standards for docks. A variance may be required for the amount of dock located beyond the 929.4' waterline. Staff has enclosed Section 6.05, Subdivisions 1, 2 and 3 of the Municipal Code. Greg Gappa, ' Director of Public Services, will review the application as approximately 65' of the dock will be located over an undeveloped street. The standard the Director will use will be if the proposed structure presents an "urureasonable hazard to the public". If a permit is granted the applicant will be required to file a Hold Harmless Agreement with the City holding the City not little for any accidents that occur from the use or placement of the structure within the ri^t-of-way. One of conditions that was required in 1990, and will be required again is that the property owner provide updated liability insurance. The property directly to the east has a similar structure that has been in place for many years. That individual structure may need repair or replacement sometime in the future. Variances may be required on these structures if they are repaired or altered. This application requires the following variances: 1. Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to permit ' hardcover and within 75' of the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka; and a variance is required to place structure in a wetland. Issues for Discussion 1. 2. That portion of Cherry Avenue that the proposed catwalk would cross is entirely within the wetland area and lakeshore and is not used for roadway purposes. The lot adjacent to the lakeshore has been legally combined. This was a requirement of the approvals in 1990. U2472 Sandra Lotion 540 Orono Orchard Road VarUmct 4/l9m Rage! 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 9 The proposed dock would allow 1 slip per 50 feet of Lake frontage. There is no adverse impact on adjoining property owners. The property to the east contains a similar structure. Approval is subject to outside agency review. The DNR has stated a new permit would be required for the structure. The applicant is advised he should file the appropriate documentation for a permit. The previous permit issued in 1990 has expired. The proposed dock is longer (263' vs. 200’) and wider (4* vs. 3*) than approved in 1990. Additional variances are required for this application than were required in 1990 as a result of the adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance in 1992. A) Structure in a wetland B) Section 10.56, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variance to permit the construction of the catwalk subject to applicant obtaining necessary approvals from the LMCD, DNR, Corps of Engineers and any other agencies that have jurisdiction on this proposal. Attachments A B C D E F G H I :< Application Description of Request Site Plan/Survey Plat Map Location Map Site Topography DNR Letter DNR Permit Extensions Deck (catwalk) Plan Municipal Code Section 6.04 Resolution #2807 Permit Record §2472 Sandra Larson 540 Orono Orchard Road Variance 4/19/99 Page 3 or ESJEEN ST ,-^S ^ 5 Z' WEST tRjucw RO -!? . BAH I BATS » WATlRTolnr ,B -____TV ^ S0I«R5 j T : g'"*--^.... ■" DE w 9 • • • . SCO - M •* T';. '^ * trr •FOX .♦«.■» Vi Skogsb€^ Pcint ^11 FOX c«f lir . xj u y ■>• •isf vsaiii rt«!i • ~'.\- :'tw»*T ' *”. *• • 'i •;..' ■■ Y\ •' \ LA A* w ____. . Ci >«’' ..' - ■—’ ^ 5 />=rv.v-_:A»* X*;* *5 • •.♦*•• . •. 'r--l***~* V* •• V ;if. ••••• • •^. •• . - i r.t • "n y I«^ . • •. * *- V **^ i ***^^^ ** ^**"*^ uccrurN^j .:y PsJSLAND vs^ <1-V’;' * . . ‘ —' %'s: 'C-r^-vv -'*---•^^•-'1 >• *• ‘vawmjnSn ; . X/ ■ ave \ V*-.. * * •.._ 'A-:»2.^ ^/ ^RING "“TT3 Moi 'Si2rs"*n OTT *^aS5 o'7*0I"*^W^n.**St>3£L UHB cmr ^Lfw|iiciTW 7 «au Spring •V SMOJULUIE o ■^\ • i i&air ITO Minnesota Department of Natural Resources DNR Waters - Metro Region, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106-6793 Telephone: (651) 772-7910 Fax: (651) 772-7977 April 12,1999 Mr. Paul Weinberger City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 APR 1 3 1999 Cl n 'j'" Re; Zoning Application #2473 for Matthew B. Herman, Lake Minnetonka - North Arm (27- 133-22), City of Orono, Hennepin County Dear Mr. Weinberger; In a recent letter, you asked about the status of DNR Permit #90-6244, which was issued 6/29/90 for a 263' x 4' boardwalk at 3825 Cherry Avenue. Since state law only allows a DNR work in bed of public waters permit to be valid for five years, a new permit would be required. The applicable laws have not changed, so unless there is new information about the site or new local regulations that would preclude the issuance of a permit, I would not expect a problem with a new applicant receiving a DNR permit. However, they would have to go through the full application process, which typically takes 60 days. I can provide a copy of the original application materials for DNR Permit #90-6244 if Mr. Herman does not already have a copy. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District should also be consulted, if they have not already, since a variance from the LMCD code may be required for such a boardwalk. If you have any further questions, please contact me at (651) 772-7914. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist c; Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, Greg Nybeck Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Jim Hafher Lake Minnetonka - North Arm (27-133-22) File DKRInformation: 651-296-6157 • 1-888-646-6367 • TTY: 651-296-5484 • 1-800-657-3929 Printed on R«cyd«d Pape Conlaininga Mif^fTHjm of 10% Poft-Conaumar Wasta An Equal Opportunity Employer NVlio Values Diversity PHONE NO. M STAII OF ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Metro Waters, 1200 Warner Rd., St, Paul, MM 5S10^„g 772-7910 Kovember 16, 1992 !£rey Johnson 825'Cherry Avenue Orono, Minnesota 55354 Permit #90-6244 Extension, Lake Minnetonka (27-'133) North Arm, Hennepin County Dear Mr. Johnson: As reguested in your reply to our letter of October 16, 1992, the expiration date of Permit #90-6244 is hereby- emended to Nove^er 30, 1993. All other terms and conditions of the permit shaxl remain in full force and-effect. Please notify us when the project is complete, and submit any as- • built survey (if applicable) or photos of. the project you may have available. Every attempt should be made to complete this project within the timeframe authorized under this permit. sincerely. jinn Line Stine Regional Hydrologist cc; USCOE Hennepin SWCD Minnehaha Creek WSD LMCD City of Orono Jon Parker, DNR Wildlife Conservation Officer Steve Walter . Lake Minnetonka (27-133) file #22 CfTYoe OflONCse@o'^ -^•01^. 1 a i992 an eoual opportunity employer 1 STATE OF ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PHONE NO. Metro Waters, 1200 Warner Rd., St. Paul, MM 55106 772-7910 February 27, 1992 •• • • , . • . • Mr. Jeffrey Johnson 3825 Cherry Avenue Orono, MM 55364 ■ RE: Permit #90-6244 Extension, Lake Minnetonka (27-133) North Arm, Boardwalk Across Wetland, Hennepin County Dear Mr. Johnson: As r espies ted'in your reply to our letter of January 27, 1992, the expiration date of Permit #90-6244 is hereby extended to November 30, 1992. All other terms and conditions of the permit shall remain in full force and effect. Please notify us when the project is complete, and submit any as- built survey (if applicable) or photos of the project you may have available. Every attempt should be made to complete thxs project within the timeframe authorized under this permit. Sincerely, ihn Line Stine Regional Hydrologist JLS/kka cc:USCOE Hennepin SWCD Minnehaha Creek WSD LMCD City of Orono Jon Parker, DNR Wildlife Conservation Officer J. Konrad Lake Minnetonka (27-133) file #22 MAR a .1232 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER V t: § 6.04 SEC. 6.04, TRAFFIC AND PARKING CONTROL. Subd. 1. Traffic and Parking Signs and Signals. No device# sign or signal shall be erected or maintained for traffic or parking control unless it is authorized by the City. The Public Works Department and the Chief of Police are hereby authorized to erect such traffic or parking control devices as may be necessary or desirable; provided# that when traffic and parking control is marked or sign-posted, such marking or sign-posting shall attest to authorization. The City may require the erection or removal of signs on private roads at the expense of the private road owner. Provided# that except as otherwise required by the City# private road owners may erect# regulate and privately enforce other traffic and parking restrictions within the private road right-of-way. Subd. 2. Traffic Restrictions and Prohibitions. It is a misdemeanor for any person to drive a vehicle contrary to lane restrictions or prohibitions painted on any street# or contrary to sign-posted# fenced# or barricaded restrictions or prohibitions. Subd. 3. Parking Restrictions and Prohibitions. It is unlawful for any person to park a vehicle, except an emergency vehicle# contrary to lane restrictions or prohibitions painted on any curb# or contrary to sign-posted# fenced# or barricaded restrictions or prohibitions. Subd. 4. Damaging or Moving Markings. Except as otherwise provided# it is a misdemeanor for any person to deface# mar# damage# obscure# move# remove# or in any way tamper with any structure# work# material# equipment, tools# sign# signal# barricade# fence# painting or appurtenance in any street unless such person has written permission from the City or is an agent# employee or contractor for the City# or other authority having jurisdiction over a particular street, and acting within the authority or scope of a contract with the City or such other authority. SBC. 6.05. CONSTRUCTION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC ROADWAY SURFACING# SIDEWALK# CURB AND GUTTER# DRIVEWAY APRONS OR CURB CUTS. Subd. 1. Methods of Procedure. Abutting or affected property owners wishing to contract for# construct or reconstruct public roadway surfacing# sidewalk, curb and gutter# driveway# driveway approaches# driveway turnarounds# or curb cuts must first obtain a permit from the City in accordance with this Section. Also# with or without petition by the methods set forth in the Local Improvement Code of Minnesota Statutes, presently beginning with Section 429.011# as the same may from time to time be amended. ORONO CC 140-2 (4-1-04) (7-25-88) § 6.05 Subd. 2. Requirement and Application for Permit. It is a misdemeanor to construct or reconstruct a sidewalk, curb and gutter, driveway, driveway approach, driveway turnaround, curb cuts, roadway surfacing or any other private improvement in any public road or other public property in the City without a permit in writing from the City. Application for such permit shall be made on forms approved and provided by the City and shall sufficiently describe the contemplated improvements, the contemplated date of beginning of work, and the length of time required to complete the same, provided that no permit shall be required for any such improvement ordered installed by the Council. Such application shall also contain information showing the type of construction, the width and the location of an improvement on the parcel of land and the lot and block number or the parcel number and the street and house number and a profile of the proposed improvement, if necessary, and other such information as may be required by the Public Works Director. The application shall be filed by the property owners desiring to construct such a driveway approach, driveway turnaround, sidewalk, curb and gutter, driveway, curb cut, roadway surfacing or private improvements in any public road or any property in the City, or by his or her duly authorized agent. All such applications shall contain an agreement by the applicant to be bound by this Chapter. A permit from the City shall not relieve the holder from damages to the person or property of another caused by such work. These regulations shall apply to all City, State and County Roads. Subd. 3. Issuance of Permit. Such permit shall be issued by the Public Works Director, if he or she has determined that the applicant has complied with the terms of this ordinance, the permit fee hereinafter specified has been paid and the Public Works Director has approved the driveway, driveway approach, driveway turnaround, sidewalk, curb and gutter, curb cuts, roadway surfacing or private improvement in any public road or other public property in the City as requested or with stipulated changes. The Public Works Director shall have the authority to refuse to issue a permit when, in the judgement of the Public Works Director, the requested construction would impose an unreasonable hazard to the public. Such decision may be appealed in writing by the applicant to the City Council. The City Council shall have the power to affirm, reverse or modify the decision of the Public Works Director. Subd. 4. Permit Fees. The fees for permits for the construction of improvements as outlined above# shall be as se forth in the City's Fee Schedule which may be amended from time to time. ORONO CC 140-3 (7-25-88) \City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _• 2807 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 6 (3)(B), SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 IA) AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 FILE #1515 WHEREAS, Jeffrey Johnson (hereinafter "the applicant**) is the owner of the property located at 3825 Cherry Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter **City**) and legally described as follows: The West half of Lot 2, all of Lot 3, and the North 45* of Lots 28 and 29, Block 7, Crystal Bay View, Lot 2, Block 3, Crystal Bay View, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter *'the property*'); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (3) (B) and Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (A) to permit the construction of a 200* long cat walk, an accessory structure, on a property consisting of multiple lots divided by an unimproved road. Cherry Avenue, that divides a lakeshore lot from the remaining interior lots requiring a variance that would seek credit for the principal residence on the interior lot for the accessory structure on the lakeshore lot, and hardcover and setback variances within the 0-75* setback area for the 200*x3* cat walk structure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1515. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 1/2 acre in area. The interior lots within the jointly owned properties consist of 22,183 square feet. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 16, 1990, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: Page 1 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. __ 2807 _ A) The portion of Cherry Avenue that the proposed cat walk structure would cross is totally within the wetland/lakeshore and is not used for roadway purposes and is currently unimproved* B) The legal combination of the substandard lot will now be tied to an adjacent homestead parcel and will never be the subject of a land use independent of any homestead. C) The proposed dock structure meets the LMCD criteria for authorized dock use area for a dock with one slip (1 slip per 50 lineal feet of shoreline). D) The property consists of predominately wetlands and lakeshore. E) There is no adverse impact on adjoining property owners or the public generally as a similar dock and cat walk structure has existed on the property to the immediate east without any record of accidents or apparent hazard to the public who use the adjacent main lake and roadway. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commissionf reports by City staffs comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 • • •• •.• » \ • • * • ^ •«• • •-• •♦••••. *• ^ •*••■* •» ♦• •*•• City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2807________ CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono (zi t-Y Council hereby grants variances to the Municipal Zoning Cc =1^ Sections noted above to permit the construction of a 200'x3' cal walk, portions of which are to be located within the unimproved right-of-way of Cherry Avenue and within riparian Lot 2, Block 3, Crystal Bay View, to serve the residence located at 3825 Cherry Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to filing the variance resolution by the City, applicant must apply for the ^e^^l combination of three parcels, P.I.D. #08-117-23 33 0041, 08-117-23 33 0037, 08- 117-23 33 0058. 2. Upon application for a building permit for the cat walk/dock structure on Lot 2, Block 3, Crystal Bay View and unimproved Cherry Avenue, applicant must submit tne following: A) Survey showing any encroachments of property and location of proposed structure within subject lot and right-of-way of Cherry Avenue. The accessory structure must meet the required 10' side setback from the west side lot line. B) Approval permits from Corp of Engineers, DNR and Orono Public Works Department. Applicant to provide f 2^ Iy executed Hold Harmless agreement with the building permit application. 3. Posting of cat walk/dock structure with ”No Trespassing/Private Property" signage. 4. Based on standards of LMCD and this variance approval, the.dock shall be limited to 1 slip. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building Pefjjt within one year of the date ^ ^ VAriAnc6 will expire on that date (May 29# 1991). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 5 mmm m mm ^ m — •mm m «»# »« 4m • •• 'm • * •mm • City of OltOINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2807_ _ _ __ 7» The undersigned applicant has read^ understood hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby aorees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 29th day of May, 1990. ATTj r: allin. City Cler)^^ Jaiut. ss. r^ei^b^So^SvetTs) STATE OF'^MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 29th day of May, 1990, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of 0>-ono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. NO^?uluc ^MiNNESOrA HENNEPIN COUNTY My oom/nl«sJon expires ^^92 Page 4 of 5 wm u City of OROrVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2807 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this before n appeared ______ day of »tary Public within — 5^Hbhe^3erson(s) desc 3 for s'ai 199 0 before me a Notary^ Public within and for s'eJid county, personally known to me to b#^he'>-6erson(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument/ and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. ^-S-- 9 '3- MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) on this /S'i' day of _ _ _ _ _ _r 199^, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared d^stliihed in and who executed themeforegoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC »c7^f "p S?u*c HENNEPIN COUNTY My commiMion txpiris ^^9?MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 5 of 5 dhji^ro, .(J PERMIT RECORD Permit No. (f£tO ^530 c? 9^0 iMl SJi6Z> Date 6-^11-90 L -o2 -f 3 Type of Permit Jajoc ^x ^ hJoixfi, hjicJ Qtht! 10 TO: FROM: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Staff DATE: SUBJECT: April 8,1999 #2475 Ronald P. Zelinsky, Jr. 320 Tumham Road Variance-Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IA Lot Area:2.8 acres One Family Rural Residential District (5 acres) Exhibits:A B C D E F G H I Application: Application Plat map Property Owner's list Plat drawing Pool house plan Pool and landscaping plan Pictures Topo map Septic Map The applicant is proposing to construct a 18' by 36 ’ swimming pool and and a 12' by 16' pool house in the side yard adjacent to street yard where a 33' setback is proposed and a 100' setback is required. The proposed accessory structures will be located between the property line and the principal structure where the Zoning Code requires accessory structures to be located to the rear or side of a principal structure in relation the property line. According to the building plan attached as Exhibit E the pool house will contain toilet, sink and shower facilities. This requires a "Plumbing in Accessory Building" Conditional Use Permit. To qualify for plumbing in an accessory building the structure shall be conforming in location, size and #247S Ztllnsky 320 Tumham Rood 4/19/99 page--I I height. In this case the structure is located encroaching approximately 66' into the front yard setback. The building is also located closer to the front lot line than the principal building. Swimming Pool The Zoning Code recognizes swimming pools as structure. The pool is located closer to the front lot line than the principal residence. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code is to maintain a rural character for the RR-IA Zoning District. It is the position of Staff that other locations on the property may be able to support the pool. The proposed location of the pool was • once part of the septic site before a replacement system wjis installed in 1994. The new system is located behind the garage. Please refer to Exhibit I for the new location of the drainfield and sewer pipes. The applicants should comment on the proposed location of the pool and pool house vs. other locations on the property. Plumbing in an Accessory Building Previous property owners were denied a Conditional Use Permit for a Guest House in 1994. However, they were approved to install plumbing into the structure for the purposes of a home office. The office area is located above the existing garage. Pertinent Ordinances: • Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (D), Location and (F) Plumbing • Section 10.27, Subd. 5 ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards RR-IA District Standards Lot Area lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Street 5 acres 300'100'100 ’50'100' #2475 Zilinsky }20 Tumham Road 4/19/99 page^2 Subject Property Lot Area and Yards Lot Area Lot Width Side Adj. to Street Rear Yard Side Yard Front Yard 2.8 acres 351'90'230'125’33' proposed The location is proposed because the applicant has stated that this location on the property is most desirable given the location of the house, existing landscaping and trees, and the topography of the rear yard. STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant has provided a statement of hardship on the front page of the application. Issues for discussion 1. Plumbing is only allowed in accessory structures meeting all yard requirements. Should the City allow variances to permit this activity when it is prohibited by the Zoning Code? 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The applicants own two lots that have not been legally combined. All improvements on the lot must meet the existing yard setbacks for the west lot. Because of the Zoning District requirement of 5 acres it is recommended the property owner combine both lots. Should the City issue variances for setbacks from the street when it appears there may be other locations on the property that could support a swimming pool. The property does contain an accessory structure with plumbing provided. The pool house would be a second accessory building with indoor plumbing. The lot is 2.8 acres in a 5 acre Zoning District. A Guest House Conditional Use Permit would require 10 acres. The applicant is requir' d to submit an updated survey showing all existing and proposed conditions on the lot. U247J Zelinsky 320 Turnham Road 4/19/99 pagt-^3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending denial of the applicantion based on the following: A. Plumbing in an Accessory Structure requires the applicants apply for a Conditional Use Permit. B. Any accessory building with plumbing is required to meet all yard setbacks. The building is located entirely within the front yard, ahead of the principal residence on the property. C. The swimming pool is within the required yard. D. Other locations may be available for locating the swimming pool on the lot that would not impact current or future adjacent property owners. E. A Survey is required for all existing and proposed conditions on the property. U2475 Ztlinsky 320 Turnham Road 4/19/99 page-4 k <3/75Application# Date Receiv^ 2i- ! 0> Amount Paid ived aid W <3^ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial AppUcation Fee $250.00 i-pOOljlOM^C (S50.00 per each additional variance) ' f - Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from ori^nal application) Variance for non-confomung structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFO Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)___ _________ Attach legal description to^pplication if nm included on required survey. Date Property Acquired /uA^U^'h I (do) (do not) also own ^'^adjacent . Present use of pr^erty: residential (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own ^'^adjacent parcels of land. property: residential other (specify) _________________ Zoning District: ^(2- (K~~ (^ aaeT^v^cf)___txottbv^ (o q'7 ^ APPLICA] 'yuKnmiK 1^.City:. Phone (home) Phoi^^ork) IS f* OWNER OC different than applicant) Name Address: Phone (home) Phone (work) City:.Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUl^T Describe lequest in.detai . /_ Estimated Con^niction Cost $ \Kcc1\ot^ rr jhi 000 c PT • ‘ V c.•• \ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _ (attach additional sheets if necessary) ^cXxM (0.03 ^.CD) Locofib-k Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage ':^v5 . Average Lakeshore AriUnoiAi- -j\5 Shggt fi HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS compUaafe ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- , //5 lUO, b(4) 261 (8)-u^ o (7) <?5>, ,*• «*« a*#*#**#********#*#*^** •r.\%v.%*.*.*.‘.*.'.\*.*.*.*. V.V.*.*.•.*'.*/. V.\*.‘.*^.*/. ••••«•••#•••••••••••• •.♦ • • • • ................... ______ • a • ^ a Aaaattafta**aa*aaa»a«aa%a%%»aa««aafta»»a*;:x;x::<:;:x:;:x:x:x.; ■jpiifli’d 431.7 OOC NO 5030105 r L-y (Hd « 3 (9) i i I I ( RUN DATE OS/SO/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST BATCH 507 PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AODR SB S1'11B-2S SI 0006 00S85 TURNHAH RO C E PHELPS t J C PHELPS CHARLES E/JENNXFER C PHELPS S8S TURNHAH RD ORONO KN 55359 . PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 31-118-23 42 0007 00S40 TURNHAH RD C E TRUAX 8 J E HENCE JR C E TRUAX t J E HENCE JR S40 TURNHAH RD HAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 PROP A1»R OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 S1-118-2S 42 0013 00S20 TURNHAH RD J L 8 R P ZELINSKY JR J L 8 R P ZELINSKY JR 320 TURNHAH RD HAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 507 00009 38 31 118 23 42 0016 4355 CHIPPEWA LA FE JR & OE SHEMANEK FREDERICK E SHEMANEK JR RT2 BOX16 maple plain MN 55369 001738 31 118 23 42 4385 CHIPPEWA LA JM FRITZLER ETAL J MARC FRITZLER DESYL L PETERSON 4385 CHIPPEWA LA MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 REPORT NO. PX435401 PAGE 23 38 31-118-23 31 0009 04435 WOLVERTON PL D P 8 K L GRANDSTRAND DAVID P/KAREN L GRANDSTRAND 4435 WOLVERTON PL ORONO HN 55359 38 31-118-23 31 0010 00038 ADDRESS UNASSXCNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND HErOIEPXN FORFEITED LAND 1027-NC ■ I« 38 31-118-23 42 0008 00380 TURNHAH RD D E 8 D F HERZ DOUGLAS E 8 DIANE F HERZ 380 TURNHAH RD HAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 38 31-118-23 42 0009 04325 CHIPPEWA LA RONALD R DENULLXN6 ETAL DANIEL 8 REBECCA SCHULTZ 4325 CHIPPEWA LA HAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 SB 31-118-23 42 0014 00320 TURNHAH RD J L 8 R P ZELINSKY JR J L 8 R P ZELINSKY JR 320 TURNHAH RD HAPLE PLAIN HN 55359 38 31-118-23 42 0015 04360 . CHIPPEWA LA L E HARTINEAU/J H HARTINEAU LARRY E 8 JEAN H HARTINEAU 4360 CHIPPEWA LA HAPLE PLAIN HN- 55359 0 > I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AMO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE^ [7 FROM iTITUE PSSOCIRTES 612 431 4114 1996.08-03 13110 N911 P.03/03 First American Titie insurance Company PLAT DRAWING (THIS IS NOT A SURVEY) n 1 ”*= 60' File #06-117916 inspected by: Tom Caliagher tnm' , ROAD, ORONO LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, CH1PPEWA3RD ADDN. 212.00 352- J 40.00 "D 'r-.r^r.; t. ns. PiAH *CW192 WnDlRNESS-2 Cbfyriel ’t ' Andrew Shddon 16'-0 ” fS9 • r , nil Ifc S This dtfdi^n cotnc9 closer to an authentic cabin, with areas for kitchen, bath, and buiit-ln eating. A sleep sofa or futon can serve Mom and Pad while the kids can sleep In the bunk lofts at each end. Or it could serve as a pool house, ^uest room, potting shed, etc. It Is built with 2x4 stud walls, plywood/batten siding and ret^uires no foundation. A material list is also included. The total area is 192 sf. I s r* 9^ S Wfo V» pgsE Si?5i E§S o’ § cjiro uiOQp4w nrN. C iVa '■j 44 4J CHIPPEWA^LN. “f u 5:"- N t-T-i/ '^5 s I tc.ovAS; f'' I » 0 0 1 r •: 1 i N ~m •D 1 ^! Q-r z CflL .H •< "o - m3 jS'- CO ! Q *z ■! ?A s€ ----------i 6* ro‘J i' I*/ j r^K__:iv . v/v, 3'u; |i f" ?8 fi- 8 5 ____________,r T-r I ^ ■■B -\(>' I'i! ? 0 - ) j:-i'l f /fi? rifi \ 'v -Ho ro o Io TJoo n u» 0) Hm "Dr* > Z « Vi / I r ti I]ii { 21 X > C 9 O n 320 Turnham Road i ' '** * * -rv:v^. • ir -' ' “*■v:5-.v. * r - f •«r« - ; * , «an, '*V« View from North Driveway & Entrance View from West Well site %iy/# 1T-1-*. *'•• ^pitiili} M u: .,.'r>H^ • * ^ ‘ ^ ■* ' , *, ~^rz ^\rr^ '’TO.z.^ •:rs..sv*4 • «« w - # ^ , l^•:> i t’^^-.t i-r-v'--^«.'.»*^r: .i. r - View from East Septic site & runs View from South Pool/ Pool House site s SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY Address: 320TumhamRd. Building Type: residence Permit#: 4728 Date of Permit: System Type: mound SYSTEM CONDITION ConformiQr: 1 Tank Condition: 5 PID: 31-118-23 42 0013 #BRs/GPD 4 Systems/unit 1/1 10/21/92 Installen Barfiiecht Exc. Appliances: Indry.dshw DF condition: 11 Failure Pot: low SEPTIC TANKS Material: precast concrete Setback to Bldg: 75 Capacity: 1000,1000,1000 DRAINFIELD Length of Lines 160 # Lines: 3 Trench Width: 10 Treatment Area: 89*43 Type of Filter: rock,clean sand Tile Size: 1.5 Under Tile 9 PercRate: 8.9 Setback DF-Bldg: 18 DFHt above Wt: 3 Soil Type: sandyloam, loam, clay loa Limitations: water table WELL DATA Setbacks - Well-Tanks: 100 Pump Type: subm. Well-DF: Report in File: y Depth: 200 Diameter: 4 Method: drilled INSPECTION RECORD DATE DESCRIPTION 6/22/94 replacement installation 10/7/96 no surfacing PUMPOUT RECORD COMPUANCE date GALLONS 1 9/13/96 2000 1 4/16/97 800 TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:April 12,1999 SUBJECT: #2472 Sandra Larson 540 Orono Orchard Road Variances—Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre) Lot Area:25,668 square feet (.59 acre) Application: The applicant has proposed to construct a covered porch to the west side of the existing residence and to screen and existing deck on the south side of the home. It is not clear when the deck was constructed because no building permit was issued or variances granted. The property consists of four lots that have been legally combined. A platted 12' alley separating Lots 3 and 4 from Lots 20 and 21. The lot was platted and developed prior to the adoption of the zoning ordinance. The house is located only 15.9' from the 'platted' alley, thus any additions or deck replacement requires variances. All structures are required to meet a 50' setback from the alley. (The entire house is located within the 50' setback.) There have been discussions with the adjacent property owner to the north, located at 500 Orono Orchard Road, to potentially vacate the alley. Currently only the Larson’s use the alley for access. If the alley was vacated the property owners would be required to construct a private driveway from Orono Orchard Road. Vacation of the alley would eliminate the setbacks required for this application. Due to several issues, vacation of the alley may take some time. The applicants intend to enclose the deck and construct the covered porch this year. This application requires the following variance: I. Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B): To permit a rear yard setback variance to allow an existing deck to be enclosed 15.9' from the rear (alley) property line and to permit a covered porch to be constructed 44' from the rear (alley) property line where 50' is required. 12- 112472 Sandra Larson 540 Orono Orchard Road Varianc€ 4/19/99 Pagtl Pertinent Ordinances: • Section 10.28: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential Zoning District ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards RR-IB (2 acre) Lot Area Lot Width Rear Yard Side Yard Street Yard Required 87,120 s.f.200'50'30'50' Proposed 25,668 s.f.100'15.9'30.3'76.5' Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 25,668 s.f.Existing: 1,816.1 s.f. Proposed: 1,895.5 s.f 7.0% 7.3% The plan includes adding a 146.4 s.f. covered porch. The portion of the existing deck located wthin the 30' side yard setback will be removed should the application for variance be approved. ANALYSIS Variance STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant's have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicant should also be asked for her testimony regarding this issue. 92472 Sandra Larson 540 Orono Orchard Road Variance 4/19/99 Page! Issues for discussion 1. 2. 3. The entire residence is located within the 50 ’ setback from the alley. This property is the only property that currently uses the alley for access. The property owners to the north have proposed to vacate the alley and assist the Larson ’s to gain access to Orono Orchard Road. If at some time in the future the alley is vacated all proposed improvements on the applicant’s property would conform to all required setbacks. 4. The deck was constructed by previous property owners without obtaining a permit or vanance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variance to permit encroachment into the required setback based on the following: 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. The setback in question is a result of a platted alley that is used only by the Larson property. 2. The alley is not improved beyond the Larson ’s property. The impacted property across the alley from the Larson ’s (Lots 4 and 5) is owned and combined with Lots 20 and 21. The existing house was constructed prior to the adoption of the Zoning Code within the 50 ’ required yard setback. There is no other location on the property the applicants could construct additions without encroaching into the setback. There is a potential the alley could be vacated should access be gained from Orono Orchard Road in the future. If the alley is vacated the improvements would meet all required yard setbacks. M24 72 Sandra Larson S40 Orono Orchard Road Variance 4/19/99 Page 3 Attachments A B C D E F G H I Application Description of Request Site Plan/Survey Elevation Views Plat Map Location Map Site Topography Property Owners List Permit Record 1^2412 Sandra Larson 540 Orono Orchard Road Variance 4/19/99 Page 4 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from orighi&l application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Application# Date Received Amount Paid zm2. its o'* 5> Property Identification Number fP.I.D.^ on.--Ooo ST Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquire d \% - _________________________ I (do) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: > residential ___pother (specify)^________ Zoning District:_________________________________________ (month/year) APPLICAJ^ Name Address:s OWNER (if different than applicant) Name____________________ Phonefhome’l ____ Phone (work)________________ City: cy^^v? *—_____Zip: Phone (home). Phone (work). Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ^C>oO Describe request in detail: ^ vN-fc. .. (attach additional sheets if necessary) •!* 4. ^ . • • V.. * VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _ X Setback: ___Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Lot Covera X Rear Ave Other (specify) rage Lakeshoig^^ jj HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property coitions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: --------------— (attach additional sheets if necessary) • • Regarding: 540 Orono Orchard Road Variance Application Sandra S. Larson Purchased house with existing In applying for the building permit to screen in existing deck, I was informed that the deck required a variance and had not been applied for when built. The only variance needed is with the alley, which is also my driveway. The alley dead-ends at my property and all city vehicles turn around at that point. There is no ability to access the alley beyond my property The existing house has a variance with the alley and this deck/screen porch would not be any closer to the alley then the existing house(see survey). if tj ^ fj a / ■ ^ • *'<*J -V • 7 .’! •" -.1 '' iW / « IW WVti^ ht^ (/fjfU/UA ^W» ^htiu^ 0 \/ •< I» «•t'P '/r ^ KVJU l_^ A CA b's*4!^ —---------—---------1 ^ — y^"* I'-e'Cs T tC 134.04 6A-J11- 23 5, BLOCK ONKA BLU 2 FS S/)24 \22 \ a 21 \ 1 1 a 20 (46: r 1 1 1 1 1 t a 19 i 1 1 \ a iZ^)/ ui/ 17 ^ (22) a 16 (2 ) a (20) « 14 ^^(I9) a * 13 VI u '£;Orono,* • —— , Course -.j ^WOOD NI.I WAT )RON ry Qlb ml B bebs^ s«!i_..l >! a ( WA oeranfS 5 iSi}' iiv; - -^-_. JJ'andgtr^ <. V* -•>. •J • •>:jy.Lake::>, •C^ .,** • .%: • • V_ .»■» • V/J • I CWKWTlWUy . * ^ % *• ,S*M . .•• . - ^ t1 • '• * . f • • l|UPtavey * ■ •r i V •■r:!Lv>' . • •. •/ x%,i*. • % «r‘ . ' ••? '-'%5tT**^VTr' • ^ •l7Jl •N' to*- .V •» • *'Xn* .T ;.i‘t'lr.’ v;-.*. .*: S?,' !• ■ Tu i- fi: ^ni:yi0^0^ r i-->*v:*.** * * .'.’.*'r r,'-S-V^"'B * .?-r • -• •*- . •. • r.- -•.. . #• ^ t . ,v* , .f <1 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PROP ADDR OWKBR NAME TAXPAYER HAME/ADDR 3S 02 117 23 31 0005 540 ORONO ORCHARD RD S SANDRA S LARSON SANDRA S LARSON 1540 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55355 CONDMN « 38 02 117 23 31 0006 550 ORONO ORCHARD RD S LAWRENCE E NELSON LAWRENCE B NELSON 550 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 CONDMN # 38 02 117 23 31 0007 . 3 8 ADDRESS UNASSIGNBD ROGER J HANKINSON ROGER J HANKINSON 570 ORONO ORCHARD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 CONDMN i PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 02 117 23 31 0008 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ROGER J HAWKINSON ROGER J HAWKINSON 570 ORONO ORCHARD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 CONDMN 8 38 02 117 23 31 0022 540 RARRETT AVE R T JAFPRAY fc V H JAPFRAY R T Cl V H JAFPRAY 540 BARRETT AVE WAYZATA MM 55391 CONDMN i 38 02 117 23 31 0046 540 BARRETT AVE R T JAFPRAY 4i V H JAPFRAY R T Cl V H JAFPRAY 540 BARRETT AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 CONDMN • 38 02 117 23 31 0011 570 ORONO ORCHARD RD ROGER J HAWKINSON ROGER J HAWKINSON 570 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 CONDMN 8 38 02 117 23 31 0023 540 BARRETT AVE R T JAFPRAY C. V H JAPFRAY R T Cl V H JAFPRAY 540 BARRETT AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 CONDMN 8 38 02 117 23 31 0049 500 ORONO ORCHARD RD S S S 6 J B WEBSTER STEVEN S Cl JO ELLEN WEBSTER 500 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 CONDMN 8 38 02 117 23 31 0014 521 HANLON AVE B S Ck A J WELCH ERIC S WELCH 521 HANLON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02 117 23 31 00^1 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNBD PAUL & MEGAN BENNETT PAUL 6 MEGAN BOINBTT 500 HANLON AVE ORONO MN 55391 CONDMN 8 I .:-.i 38 02 117 23 32 0001 485 ORONO ORCHARD RD S EDWARD H HAMM TRUSTEE EDWARD H HAMM 408 ST PETER ST 8434 ST PAUL MN 55102 CONDMN 8 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPERARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF DAT B^~^^ BY RECEIVED M&R 0 3 1999 C\TY Oh ORONO 38 02 117 23 31 0005 SANDRA S LARSON 1540 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN .55356 38 02 117 23 31 0006 LAWRENCE E NELSON 550 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02 117 23 31 0007 ROGER J HAWKINSON 570 ORONO ORCHARD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02 117 23 31 0008 ROGER J HAWKINSON 570 ORONO ORCHARD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02 117 23 31 0011 ROGER J HAWKINSON 570 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02 117 23 31 0014 ERIC S WELCH 521 HANLON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02 117 23 31 0022 R T & V H JAFFRAY 540 BARRETT AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02 117 23 31 0023 R T fi V H JAFFRAY 540 BARRETT AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02 117 23 31 OOSi PAUL & MEGAN BENNETT 500 HANLON AVE ORONO MN 55391 38 02 117 23 31 0046 R T A V H JAFFRAY 540 BARRETT AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02 117 23 31 0049 STEVEN S & JO ELLEN WEBSTER 500 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02 117 23 32 0001 EDWARD H HAMM 408 ST PETER ST #434 ST PAUL MN 55102 \. Permit No. 9}rl "iObl PERMIT RECORD Date n-n-is- lOrto^O iCi<a/?<X4.c^s^ Type of Permit P0ry\p c6Nfi/€eT iofjr * • Application Date: 3-25-99 Application Complete Date: 4-1-99 60-Day Action Deadline Date: 6-1-99 To: From: Date: Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members Michael P Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator April 14,1999 Subject: #2481 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Rezoning Lbt of Exhibits A - Application & Letter of Request B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Zoning Map E - Legal Description of Area to be Rezoned F - RR-lB-1 Zoning District Standards Background The site of the proposed Spring Hill Golf Club was first zoned in 1950 for single family residential (SFR) use as part of the North Orono Zoning District. In 1955 this was superceded by establishment of the Northeast Orono District, an SFR district requiring 1-acre minimum lot area. This area was rezoned in 1967 to R-1A SFR requiring 2-acre minimum lot area. In 1975 the 2-acre zoning district designation was revised to RR-IB Rural Residential and the portion of this site in Section 25 was rezoned RR-lB-1, an RR-IB subdistrict that allows non-profit "study and research centers" as an additional permitted use. There are no other properties in orono zoned RR-lB-1. Because the portion of property zoned RR-lB-1 will no longer contain facilities for a study and research center". Council required in Condition 1 of Resolution No. 3902, that Spring Hill Golf Club apply for rezoning of this property back to the underlying RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential District, thereby eliminating the future possibility of a "study and research center" use. Stafl*Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning from RR-lB-1 to RR-IB. Options for Action 1. 2. 3. 4. Recommend approval Table for further information Deny (state reasons) Other tidential iishment irea was ; district 125 was s" as an udy and olfClub lidential Application# Date Received 7^ Amount Paid CTTY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION She Address 7ZS" Avg, K4 Type of Application to be Filed Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Hq > 7 :s applicant \rhuu Name^ Xwaia^KJ Address,-yjacr- OWNER ^ different than applicant) Name Phone (home ) 4l^ ~ 4^ 7 <T ------ Phone (work )<^ig^^Q-^74 City _gtee?N4n ________zip Address City Phone (home)_ Phone (work)_ Date Property Acquired 1-91____________ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. fees - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - — $ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _$175.00 Residential Accessory Use -----$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 (juest House/Cjuest Apartments - ___$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _____ $300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use _____$250.00 Land Alteration ------- Grading and filUng - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ------- Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore ______ PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule --------$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) --------After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS ------ $250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation ______ $200.00 Easement Vacation ______ $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision —$350 00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals ______Other - see Fee Schedule Zip. (month/year) —1 if ‘"4^ SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB March 25,199^ City of Orono Mike Gafiron 2750 KeUy Parkway Ciystal Bay, MN 5*5323 Dear Mike, The enclosed is an application to rezone the Spring Hill property from RR-lB-1 to RR-IB so as to fulfill our Conditional Use Permit, resolution #3902. All required submittals are enclosed or have already been submitted during the permitting process or in the replatting process. In addition to the rezoning. Spring Hill has been instructed to amend our conditional use permit for a misunderstanding that the e.xisting cottage as shown on plan will be used as a security/caretaker cottage. Spring Hill Golf Club had always planned to reuse the cottage is some manner. Howes’er, Orono Staff assumed the building was going to be removed with all other demolition processes on site. This building will house employees of the Golf Club for secu-ity purposes as well as Clubhouse duti^ There will be no changes to the building other than ne^v paint and a permitted connection to the clubhouse septic system. Let me know if I can provide any other information for you. im Johnson sject Manager fr •t, 00 spring Hill Road - Wayzata, MN 53391 -.- • .■■rauu • £t hii4-i ■ ■-V—I1 A , “ < ‘i Wi !a^»^Xv<aK<vX«:«ao ccaao<S |3^S5??52M^* * ‘^v Xv;;-'^:*: Xv^x-V. :.i$i5# <??:’ \ • I 7 i p ;g»ii Si;:::<<%::-1^ 'W • ,»• 9 ^ .^m ^•••«««*««««« *••••*••«•••« • #«•••••«•••• ■ » ' ' ^ ^ A » ^ p 9 9 •• 9 • 9 9 9 1 • «• ••««•••« 4 • .. v« IMI iUS f’#^**#*#*#* *•' '•* * *•*•*.* * ii?|i i# \ i| - .... tJ \ r' m r #»*—»■< «r- 1 i ,-»V — li; RUN DATE 03/30/99 BATCH 501 PROB AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 38 25-118-23 31 0002 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD HAYZATA HN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 25-118-23 31 OOOA 01125 HUNTER DR C R 8 K W PERRY CHRISTOPHER R/KELLY W PERRY 1125 HUNTER DR WAYZATA KN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PACE 1 38 25-118-23 31 0008 00525 HUNTER PASS H D 8 S R STROBEL HARK D 8 SUSAN R STROBEL 1AS9 DEERWOOD PATH EAGAN HN 55122 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 25-118-23 31 0007 00485 HUNTER PASS W A AND L J SCHNEIDER WILLIAM AND LINDA SCHNEIDER 14405 43RD AVE N PLYMOUTH HN 55448 . 38 25-118-23 31 0008 00425 HUNTER PASS S A AND M N HELLRUNG STEPHEN 8 MARGARET HELLRUNG y. THE PILLSBURY COMPANY 200 S 8TH ST HS4043 MPLS HN 55402-1484 38 25-118-23 32 0002 00038 ADDirsS UNASSIGNEO BRUCE M 8 JULIE J STEINER BRUCE H 8 JULIE J STEINER 144 EDGEWOOD AVE S HAYZATA HN 55391 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR- OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB 25-118-23 S2 0003 00700 SIXTH AVE N BRUCE H STEINER TRUSTEE BRUCE H STEINER 700 SIXTH AVE N WAYZATA HN 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0002 00485 SPRING HILL RD HAS STOKER JR HARRY B STOKER 485 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0008 00541 NORTH STREAM RD J 8 W LAZEAR JONATHON 8 WENDY LAZEAR 541 NORTH STREAM RD HAYZATA KN 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO B8JCE N CARLSON ET AL BRUCE H 8 CAROLINE C CARLSOtC 591 NORTH STREAM ROAD HAYZATA KN 55391 38 25-116-23 33 0003 00825 SPRING HILL RD V Z 8 E T HAWN VAN ZANDT 8 ELIZABETH T HAWN 825 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0003 00445 SPRING HILL RD R J NIGON 8 M E NIGON RICHARD J 8 MARY E NIGON 445 SPRING HILL RD HAYZATA HN 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0007 00521 NORTH STREAM RD 6 L 8 S L HOFFMAN C L HOFFMAN 521 NORTI STREAM RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0010 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED BRUCE N CARLSON ET AL BRUCE M 8 CAROLINE C CARLSON 591 NORTH STREAM ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 25-118-23 33 0004 00725 SIXTH AVE N SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0004 00591 NORTH STREAM RD B 8 C CARLSON BRUCF H 8 CAROLINE C CARLSON 591 NORTH STREAM RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 25-118-23 34 0008 00531 NORTH STREAM RD 6 L HOFFMAN SSL HOFFMAN G L 8 SUSAN HOFFMAN 521 NORTH STREAM RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 25-118-23 41 0001 00300 SIXTH AVE N DOUGLAS DAYTON ETAL DOUGLAS J DAYTON 300 CO RD NO 8 HAYZATA MN 55391 li^ * a I i / F 0 RUN DATE OS/SO/99 BATCH 501 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORNATION SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PZ4S5401 PAGE 2 SB 25-1I8-2S 4S 0095 003SS HOLLANDER RD G C I N H VACEK GARY C I NARY H VACEK SSS HOLLANDER RD WAYZATA NN 55S91 SO 25-110-2S AS 0000 00SA5 SPRING HILL RD JULZE A FELDNANN JULZE A FELDNANN 545 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA NN 55391 SO 25-110-23 43 0009 00335 HOLLANDER RD W W ERICKSON I N D ERICKSON WALTER W 0 NANCY D ERICKSON 335 HOLLANDER RD WAYZATA NN 55391 30 26-110-23 31 0001 00030 ADDRESS UNASS16NED JOHN E SCHUETT I WIFE JOHN E SCHUETT 1205 TANARACX DR LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 26-lie-23 31 0002 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DUNCAN N DAYTON DUNCAN N DAYTON 445 E LAKE ST STE 220 WAYZATA NN 55391 30 26-110-23 31 0000 01099 TANARACK DR CHARLES C DUNNAVAH CHARLES C DUNNAVAH 1099 TANARACK DR LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 26-110-23 31 0009 01065 TANARACK DR S I L PETERSON STEPHEN C PETERSON 1065 TANARACK DR LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 26-110-23 41 0002 00030 ADDRESS UNASSZGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA NN 55391 30 26-110-23 41 0003 01101 WILLOWBROOK DR D W I L E BRUESKE DERALD I LOIS BRUESKE 1101 WILLOWBROOK DR ORONO NN 55391 30 26-110-23 41 0006 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGHED D W A L E BRUESKE DERALD 0 LOIS BRUESKE 1101 WILLOWBROOK DR ORONO NN 55391 30 26-110-23 41 0007 01150 WYHDNERE RD KEriN N HOPPE KERN H HOPJ»E 1150 WYNDENERE RD WAYZATA NN 55391 SO 26-110-23 41 0009 01105 WYNDHERE RD R V NASON I N J NASON RONALD V I NARTHA J NASON 1105 WYHDNERE RD WAYZATA NN 55391 30 26-110-23 41 0010 01165 WYHDNERE RD B K HONG IKK HONG BACK K HONG 1165 WYramERE RD WAYZATA NN 55391 30 26-118-23 31 0007 01111 TANARACK DR S L I C A BRENNAN SIDNEY L BRENNAN JR 17105 24TH AVE H PLYNOUTH NN 55447 38 26-110-23 34 0005 01135 SIXTH AVE N E W I H S SPENCER EDSON W I HARRIET S SPENCER 1135 SPRING HILL RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 30 26-110-23 41 0004 01175 WILLOWBROOK DR R C B S K KRUEGER RICHARD C I SUSAN K KRUEGER 1175 WILLOWBROOK DR WAYZATA NN 55391 30 26-110-23 41 0?^6 01100 WYNDHERE RD Y I Y KIN YOUNGKI t YOUNGSUH KIN 1100 WYHDNERE RD WAYZATA NN 55391 30 26-110-23 41 0011 01145 WYHDNERE RD RESOURCE BANK/TRUST CO SUZANNE H JACKSON 1145 WYHDNERE RD WAYZATA NN 55391 in'4. 'vi 1l i %’ ■V { •• I '^•5- RSTE 5 \n— i RUN DATE 03/30/99 BATCH 501 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 26-118-23 61 0012 00038 ADDRESS UNASSZCNEO KERN H HOPPE KERN HOPPE 1150 WYNDHERE RD MAYZATA HN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM property OWNERS LIST 38 26-118-23 62 0002 00038 ADDRESS UNASSZCNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 REPORT NO. PI635601 PAGE 3 38 26-118-23 62 0003 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 26-118-23 62 0006 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD NAYZATA HN 55391 38 26-118-23 62 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 26-118-23 63 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICH^P SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER ' NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ATDR 38 26-118-23 63 0006 01125 SPRING HILL RD D R RICHARD 8 E A RICHARD DAVID 8 ETHEL RICHARD 1125 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 26-118-23.66 0003 00860 SPRING HILL RD SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 36-118-23 22 0003 00755 SPRING HILL RD ! WINSTON 8 E C WINSTON FREDERICK WINSTON 765 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 80 26-118-23 13 0001 01382 TAMARACK DR S E HOYT 8 H T SAHUELS SETH E HOYT 1382 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 26-118-23 63 0005 01025 SPRING HILL RD H B 8 C BROOKS TRUSTEES HARNEY B 8 CONLEY BROOKS 600 BAKER BLDG HPLS HN 55602 38 26-118-23 66 0006 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD . WAYZATA HN 55391 80 26-118-23 12 0006 01622 TAMARACK DR MICHAEL G HOFKIN AND WIFE MICHAEL C HOFKIN 1622 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 80 26-118-23 13 0002 00080 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA MH 55391 38 26-118-23 66 000.. 00951 SPRING HILL RD W D DUNLAP JR 8 L H DUNLAP WILLIAM D DUNLAP JR 951 SPRING HILL ROAD WAYZATA HN 55391 38 35-118-23 11 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 80 26-118-23 12 0007 00080 ADDRESS UNASSICNED JOHN C 8 JOAN L LEEDS GAIL H KNAPPENBERGER 1620 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE HN 5535E 80 26-118-23 16 0001 01225 WILLOWBROOK DR ELAINE H MOULTON ELAINE H HOULTON 1225 WILL0W8R00K DR WAYZATA MH 55391 •• V. 1 Jtf L ff \ :r\i /•< • > V* • 5 I RUN DATE 03/30/99 BATCH 501 PROP ADDR OHNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR ao 24-118-23 14 0002 01275 WXLLOWBROOX DR ROBERT K LEEDS ROBERT X LEEDS 1275 HILLOWBROOKE DR VAYZATA NN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST so 24-118-23 14 0003 01300 WILLOWBROOK DR C t N ALSNOUSE CRAIG 8 NARY ALSHOUSE 1300 WILLOWBROOK DR WAYZATA HN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 4 80 24-118-23 21 0003 01425 TAHARADC DR H 8 K VON BLUECHER HAX VON BLUECHER 1425 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE NN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 80 24-118-23 24 0001 01325 TAMARACK DR G A 8 S J SCHWALBACH G A 8 S J SCHWALBACH 1325 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE NN 55354 . 80 24-118-23 24 0003 01205 TAMARACK DR JOHN E SCHUETT ETAL JOHN E SCHUETT 1205 TAMARACK RD LONG LAKE NINN 55354 80 26-118-23 24 0004 01255 TAMARACK DR R 8 N BAKER RANDAL W BAKER 1255 TAMARACK DRIVE LONG LAKE MN 55354 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 501 00040 38 36 118 23 22 0003 755 SPRING HILL RD F WINSTON & EC WINSTON FREDERICK WINSTON 765 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA MN 55391 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. /J:/-;. f*:-ri • • « • RR-lB-1 SINGLE FAMILY 2 ACRE UNSEWERED % • The following property in the South 1/2 of Section 25, Township 118, Range 23; Bounded on the North by Gth Avenue • North, on the East and Soyth by Spring Hill Road and Hunter Drive extended, and o.i the West by the West line of Section 25, Township 118, Range 23... ‘ . .. . . ‘• • . • •• • • •• •••• #.rf • • • •• •*•> j \ • t • • • • •• • • • • • •• . .N* *v*.—r . .♦.•••vv .. . . . . . . .I jr-Vw . • V F § 10.29 SEC. 10.29. RR-lB-1 ONE FAMILY RURAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT. Subd. 1. Permitted Uses, Conditional Uses, Accessory Uses. Any use as regulated in the "RR-IB” District. Subd. 2. Additional Permitted Use. Study and research centers owned or operated by one or more non-profit charitable, scientific or educational organizations, provided that no building other than a residence shall be located within 100 feet of any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District. , j j Subd. 3. Open Space. Not more than 15% of land devoted to use as a study and research center shall be occupied by structures or buildings without a conditional use permit allowing a greater percentage of such land use. Any application for zoning of land as an "RR-IB-I" One Family Rural Residential Subdistrict shall be accompanied by a map or plan showing the portion of land within the district that may be occupied by structures or buildings shall become a part of the conditions upon which such zoning is approved, and no structure or building may be located outside of such portion without a conditional use permit allowing the same. Subd. 4. Height. No structure or building in a study and research center shall exceed thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. Subd. 5. Temporary or Permanent Residents. No study and research center shall at any time serve as a temporary or permanent residence for a number of persons in excess of that determined by multiplying by 2-1/2 the number of acres of land devoted to use as such study and research center without a special permit allowing a greater number of persons in such number and for such periods of time as the Council may deem appropriate, due consideration being given to the interests of health, safety and public welfare. Subd. 6. Use. No study and research center shall at any time permit more than 300 persons to be present by invitation upon its property, without a special permit allowing a greater number of persons in such number and for such periods of time as the Council may deem appropriate, due consideration being given to the interests of health, safety and public welfare. Subd. 7. Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements. (See Section 10.28, Subdivision 5.) ORONO CC 290-1 (4-1-84) Application Date: 3-25-99 Application Complete Date: 4-1-99 60-Day Action Deadline Date: 6-1-99 11/ To: From: Date: Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator April 14,1999 Subject: #2482 Spring Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North - Guest House CUP List of Exhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Site Plans (Original and Proposed) E - Letter of Request F - Excerpt from Resolution No. 3902 Background At the time of CUP application for the Golf Club, plans showed the existing Spring Hill caretaker house (the old farmhouse overlooking Spring Hill Road, and just southwest of the new clubhouse) likely to be removed, since it appeared to conflict with the 5th tee. It also was shown on those drawings in dashed lines, suggesting it was to be removed. As a result, the language of Resolution No. 3902 listed all accessory buildings approved for the property and did not include the caretaker house or its ^vo associated outbuildings (see Exhibit F). In January 1998 the Club requested and was granted approval to construct an entirely new clubhouse rather than remodeling the old conference center. The location of the clubhouse did not change, and the new site plan did not extend westward far enough to inkle to staff that the caretaker house was intended to remain. In summer 1998 the Club was allowed to connect the caretaker house to the clubhouse septic system, the Building Department staff being unaware that it was not an 'approved' building. This came to my attention this winter when Club Manager Tim Ivory’ requested a separate address for the caretaker house. Condition 3 of Resolution No. 3902 requires an amendment of the CUP if additional accessory buildings are proposed. Because it will act as a 'guest house', the caretaker house also requires a Guest House CUP. #2482 - Spring Hill Caretaker House CUP April 14,1999 Page 3 Options for Action 1. Recommend approval per staff recommendation or witii revised conditions. 2. Table for further information (specify). 3. Recommend denial (state reasons). 4. Other. 4 Application # Daic Received Amount Paid ck ^/75 CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ^ . Site Address Type of Application to be Filed Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Uq - -53 APPLICANT l4iu^ \o\Name" J Tyw,_________________________________ Phone (work^ ^ 17^- 0^74 At/lS,^ City Gtsjpt^ ________Zip OWNER (if different than applicant) Name __________________ Address Phone (homeX Phone (work). City Date Property Acquired (n- 1-9*7 I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - $ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application ><" $175.00 Residential Accessory Use ____^ $250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _____$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use _____$250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore _____PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule _____$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) _____After-the-Fact Fee - Double Cunent Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation _____$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision y $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$35r 00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule Zip.. (month/year) •'f •* *s». ' a «7 f j'J .. i > if I. ^ V .*B ^9 *-S”V“ •^■**' 1 / / •• ! C-----^ J -<: 3 * ^mm ill •::;::‘;;i‘<’x<>;-: v.'X-X-^xivvi:- * •■v:>>X X;X:>:.y;w>?.*.* -.y:•?>>:• 3/_//^ J.?- ;? RUN DATE fV30/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI4S5401 PACE 1 BATCH Sn PROP AODR ONNEB NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 58 25-118-25 51 0002 00058 ADDRESS UNASSXCNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RO HAYZATA HN 55591 58 25-118-25 51 0004 01125 HUNnX DR ^XSTmER^R^ELLY N PERRY 1125 HUNTER DR HAYZATA HN 55591 58 25-118-25 51 0008 00525 HUNTER PASS H D 8 S R STROBEL HARK D I SUSAN R STROBEL 1454 DEERWOOD PATH EAGAN HN 55122 |-$ PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 25-118-25 51 0007 00485 HUNTER PASS H A AND L J SCHNEIDER HXLLZAN AND LINDA SCHNEIDER 14405 45RD AVE N PLYHOUTH HN 55448 . 58 25-118-23 51 0008 00425 HUNTER PASS S A AND H N HELLRUNG STEPHEN 8 MARGARET HELLRUNG Z THE PXLLSBURY COMPANY 200 S 8TH ST NS4045 HPLS HN 55402-1484 58 25-118-25 52 0002 00058 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED BRUCE H 8 JULIE J STEINER BRUCE H 8 JULIE J STEINER 144 EDGEWOOD AVE S HAYZATA HN 55591 * •» PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 25-118-25 52 0005 00700 SIXTH AVE N BRUCE H STEINER TRUSTEE BRUCE H STEINER 700 SIXTH AVE N HAYZATA HN 55591 58 25-118-25 55 0005 00825 SPRING HILL RO VAN LnOT 8*«!zZABETH T HAHN 825 SPRING HILL RD HAYZATA HN 55591 58 25-118-25 55 0004 00725 SIXTH AVE N SPRING HILL GOLF CLUS SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RO HAYZATA HN 55591 ; I PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 58 25-118-25 54 0002 00485 SPRING HILL RO H 8 S STOKER JR HARRY B STOKER 485 SPRING HILL RO HAYZATA HN 55591 38 25-118-25 54 0005 00445 SPRING HILL RD R J NIGON SHE NXCON RTCHARO J 8 HARY E NXCON 445 STRING HILL RD HAYZATA HN 55591 58 25-118-25 54 0004 00591 NORTH STREAH RO BSC CARLSON BRUCE H 8 CAROLINE C CARLSON 591 NORTH STREAH RO HAYZATA HN 55591 n tr ■- PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 58 25-118-25 54 0008 00541 NORTH STREAH RD J 8 H LAZEAR JONATHON 8 WENDY LAZEAR 541 NORTH STREAH RO HAYZATA HN 55391 38 25-118-23 54 0007 00521 NORTH STREAH RD 0 L 8 S L HOFFMAN G L HOFFMAN 521 NORTH STREAH RO HAYZATA HN 55591 38 25-118-25 54 0008 00551 NORTH STREAM RD 6 L HOFFMAN SSL HOFFMAN G L 8 SUSAN HOFFMAN 521 NORTH STREAM RO HAYZATA HN 55391 PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 25-118-23 54 0009 00058 ADDRESS UNASSICNEO BRUCE N CARLSON ET AL BRUCE H 8 CAROLINE C CARLSON 591 NORTH STREAH ROAD HAYZATA HN 55591 38 25-118-23 34 0010 00038 ADDRESS UNASSXCNED BRUCE N CARLSON ET AL BRUCE H 8 CAROLINE C CARLSON 591 NORTH STREAH ROAD HAYZATA HN 55591 38 25-118-23 41 0001 00300 SIXTH AVE N DOUGLAS DAYTON ETAL DOUGLAS J DAYTON 500 CO RO NO 8 HAYZATA HN 55391 0 RIM OATS OS/SA/99 BATCH 501 HENNCrZN COUNTY PROPERTY ZNFORHATZON SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PZASSAfl PACE 2 PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP AWR OWNER NAM TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PRM* AOOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAIO/AODR SO 25-118-2S 45 OOOS 00555 HOLLANDER RO 0 C I N H VACEK CARY C I NARY H VACEK 555 HOLLANDER RO WAVZATA m S5591 50 25-110-25 45 0000 00545 SPRING HILL RO JULIE A FELDHANN JUUE A FELONANN 545 SPRING HILL RO WAYZATA NN 55591 50 25-110-25 45 0009 00555 HOLLANDER RO W W ERICKSON t N D ERICKSON WALTER W 0 NANCY D ERICKSON 555 HOLLANDER RO WAYZATA NN 55591 50 20-110-25 51 0001 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOHN E SCHUETT t WIFE JOHN E SCHUETT 1205 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE IM 55550 50 20-110-25 51 0002 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO DUNCAN N DAYTON DUNCAN N DAYTON 445 E LAKE ST STE 220 WAYZATA NN 55591 58 20-110-25 51 0007 Ollll TAHARACK- DR S L 8 C A BRENNAN SIDNEY L BRENNAN JR 17105 24TH AVE N PLYMOUTH NN 55447 m 50 20-118-25 51 0008 01099 TAMARACK DR CHARLES C DUNNAVAN CHARLES C DUNNAVAN 1099 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE MM 55550 50 20-118-25 51 0009 01005 TAMARACK DR SOL PETERSON STEPHEN C PETERSON 1005 TAHARACK DR LONG LAKE IM 55550 50 20-110-25 54 0005 01155 SIXTH AVE N E W I H S SPENCER EDSON W A HARRIET S SPENCER 1155 SPRING HILL RD LONG LAKE HN 55550 fl « • 50 20-110-25 41 0002 •••50 ADDRESS UNASSICNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING MILL GOLF CLUS 70S SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA NN 55591 50 20-110-25 41 OOOS •llOl NILLOWBROOK DR D W 0 L E DRUESKE DERALD I LOIS DRUESKE 1191 WILLOWBROOK DR ORONO NN 55591 50 20-110-25 41 •••4 •1175 WILLOWBROOK DR R C • S K KRUEGER RICHARD C I SUSAN K KRUEGER 1175 WILLOWBROOK OR WAYZATA HN 55591 50 20-110-25 41 •000 •••50 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED D W t L E BRUESKE DERALB 0 LOIS BRUESKE 1101 WILLOWBROOK DR ORONO MN 55591 50 20-110-25 41 •••7 •1150 WYNDHERE RD KERN H HOPPE KERN H HOPPE 1159 WVraiEHERE RO WAYZATA NN 55591 50 20-110-25 41 •••8 •IlOO WVNDMERE RO Y 0 Y KIN Y0UN6KI t Y0UN6SUN KIN 1109 WYNDHERE RO WAYZATA NN 55591 50 20-110-25 41 OtOT •1105 WYNDHERE RO R V NASON 0 H J NASON RONALD V 0 MARTHA J NAS(M 1105 WYNDHERE RO WAYZATA HN 55591 SO 20-119-25 41 ••!• •1105 WYMXIERE RO • K HONG IKK HONG BACK K HONG 1105 WYNDHERE RO WAYZATA HN 55591 50 20-110-25 41 OBll •1145 WYNDHERE RO RESOURCE BANK/TRUST CO TRSTE SUZANNE N JACKSON 1145 WYNDHERE RO WAYZATA HN 55591 RUN DATE OS/SO/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORNAfXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PX9S5401 PAGE S ■ATCH 501 PROP AODR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR SO 2A-11S-2S 41 0012 riOSG ADDRESS UNASSX6NED KERN H HOPPE KERN HOPPE 1150 WYNDHERE RD WAYZATA HN 55S91 SO 26-11S-2S 42 0002 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSX6NED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 5SS91 SO 24-11S-2S 42 OOOS OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSXGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55S91 i PROP AODR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR SO 24>110-2S 42 0004 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSXGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING NILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55S91 TO 24-110-2S 42 0005 00050 ADDRESS UNASSXI SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 SO r«-110-2S 45.'0001 0.<ST ADDRESS UNASSXGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55S91 ‘t. i'.) \ V • tt I PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER ' NAHE/ADDR SO 24-110-2S 4S 0004 01125 SPRING HILL RD D R RICHARD SEA RICHARD DAVID S ETHEL RICHARD 1125 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55S91 30 24-110-2S 4S OOOS 01025 SPRING HILL RD H B 8 C BROOKS TRUSTEES HARNEY B 8 CONLEY BROOKS 400 BAKER BLDG HPLS HN 55402 30 24-110-23 44 0002 00951 SPRING KILL RD W D DUNLAP JR 8 L H DUNLAP WXLLXAH D DUNLAP JR 951 SPRING HILL ROAD WAYZATA HN 55S91 • j ' f-;> V { • • PROP AOOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR SO 24-110-2S.44 OOOS 00040 SPRING NILL RD SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING NILL RD WAYZATA HN 55S91 SO 24-110-23 44 0004 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSXGt*ED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD . WAYZATA HN 55591 SO S5-110-2S 11 0001 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSIC SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55S91 PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SO S4-110-2S 22 OOOS 00755 SPRING HILL RD F WINSTON 8 E C WINSTON FREDERICK WINSTON 745 SPRING NILL RO WAYZATA HN SS391 00 24-110-23 12 0004 01422 1AHARACK DR HICHAFL G HOFKIN AND WIFE HICHAEL G HOFKIN 1422 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE HN 55SS4 ' 00 24-110-23 12 0007 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSXl JOHN C 8 JOAN L LEEDS C tlL H i^NAPPENBERGER 1420 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE HN 5SS54 PROP ADM OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR 00 24-110-23 13 0001 01S02 TAHARACK DR S E NOYT 8 N T SAMUELS SETN E HOYT 1302 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE HN 55354 00 26-110-23 13 0002 00000 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55391 00 26-110-23 14 0001 01225 WILLOWBROOK DR ELAINE H HOULTON ELAINE N MOULTON 1225 WILLOWBROOK PR WAYZATA nc ss.:)i - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -.... ■ NUN DATE PVSO/99 ■ATCN S9X pmr AMM omm NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR •• 2A*lie>2S XA 9t02 •X27S NILLOHIROOK OR ROIERT K LEEDS ROOERT K LEEDS 127S RILLOMMOOKE OR NAVZATA Mt SSS9X HENNEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATXON SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 89 2A-XX8*2S X4 909S 0XS99 NILLOWDROOK DR CRH ALSNOUSE CRAIO R NARY ALSNOUSE IS99 NILLONBROOK DR NAYZATA NN 5BS9X REPORT NO. PXA5M9X PAOE A 80 2i-XX8>2S 21 OfOS 9XA25 TAHARACX DR N 8 R VON 8LUECNER NAX VON DLUECHER XA2B TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE NN SSS54 PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHR/AODR PROP ADDR TAXPAYER NRME/AOOR 80 2A-XX8-2S 2A OOOX 0XS2S TAMARACK OR 0 A R S J SCHWALDACH O A R S J SCNHALOACH X525 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE NN 55SBA . TOTAL BATCH SOX 00000 38 36 118 23 22 0003 755 SPRING HILL RD F WINSTON & EC WINSTON FREDERICK WINSTON 765 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA MN 55391 80 20*X18>2S 24 0003 0X205 TAMARACK DR JONN E SCNUETT ETAL JOIM E SCNUETT X20B TAMARACK RD LONG LAKE MINN 55350 80 20*XX8-23 24 0004 0X255 TAMARACK DR R R N RAKER RANDAL N DAKER X25B TAHARACX DRIVE LONG LAKE MN 55350 /' * ■> i /•.. • . ‘I ‘v r - ^ •: . I . d 1) (f >■/ I CERTIFY TNAT TNE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AlO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON TNE RECOMS OF TNE NENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO TNE BEST OF MV KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ^ DATE-^-^A *y^8Y I \V /*• •> u ■iBs/iossBXflHJ« u n H « «> f ■ nMAwWHM BacMV.DjMiCflfBU■IKlK«k3BB'«HawaaraalMwwM ^^■Mi'i'jB4BB'acjaaBar<riir4wiM PHRi ■ »'': B ra B J V M H k 4 HB B « B M BWWM 0«BBB8ariBLia«]BnaflaBUNDdBJU P!«BariBi)aBriB'iw«ui»rBBBrj}ii'»i ^'BIlBBBUBflBBBriVaBtlB.BBBCJnilie itefe^BIBBBBIlfBBUBBrillBIIBIillftSk IT «. I . . . . t Bw'i'iiflBJUfiBBaraBrfiJBaa'aNFiB, ■4yw^rtUUtJTBBBIll{g,Bj;iK;BBBBtl H%%Vu B» MMBNwnwBBnmainB J wIK. M * B • .'< B B K B K ‘sAKttnc^^%AA8nu ■ ca B H n M r /V" iC'K " 1005 / V • • • • • • • • • mmttrm •_• . ?B m «_• • « •- • - t N . r>^ ^ . > *^* *^^* . • . . • / h ^11 I » • ^ ^ _ • • • • • • • • ~ 1 • • • *- * t ___^ / / • • » • 9 • • • 7 »<^B B I • • • • •• • -4^ • • • • • •' I • • • • 4 9 9 • 9 9 9 9 ''V /<3 • •/ / • • • / y y y y / y i / MUM OM. \ WgAKHO COUKSt II S GKML PJJIKHO LOT 1. dUOCTO SUBGMI MCAS.MUNO Amu KPM AffiAS. ■nmdb^ " Id \ m IM4i .N (mat OVI I 1^100.41' A-jr-eM<2^' '<£■.ti- m ✓ ✓ I-;--''a- / r /^ A^eA ^ [T£T PLA^^ CoHfiu.f^'noAi t ! / / / / >^r /i-— \ •• •• w /■7 ( PINAL, i") SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB March 25.1999 CityofOrono Mike Gaffiron 2750 Kelly Parkway Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Dear Mike. The eoclosed is an application to redone the Spring Hill property from RR-1B*1 to RR-IB so as to fulfill ow Conditional Use Permit, resolution #3902. All required submittals are enclosed or have alreatfy been submitted ^ring the permitting process or in the replatting process. In addition to the rezoning. Spring Hill has been instructed to amend our conditional use permit for a iHi5^iq4yfdan<ting that the e.xisting cottage as shown on plan will be used as a security/caretalar cottage. Spring Hill Golf Club had always planned to reuse the cottage is some manner. However, Orono Staff assumed the building was going to be removed with all other demolition processes on site. This building will house employees of the Golf Club for security purposes as well as Gubhouse dutitt. There will be no changes to the building other than new paint and a permitted connection to the clubhouse septic system. Let me know if I can provide any other information for you. ‘im Johnson )ject Manager rr:--- . z .7 H ■?1 iU -J i .5 •* m• "‘.N 700 Spring Hill Road - Wayzata, MN 55391 • 4 ; F % LfiV.iiX CITY of ORONO resolution of the city council NO.8902 «d . v«iance to Sccfion 10.56 Subds. 16® & « " and placement of fiU within a '>’“5 “f®" . „f anoroxim^ely 400,000 cubic yards B-16, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. \ BEZONING. Prior to January 1.1998 tte p^ly Ri^' IEGAL COMBWA-nON. Prior to Jmuaiy parcels comprising the property ^ applicant shall execute and the allow for a more efficient granting of easements. ^ -----------rsrrzrr^rrra^w VARIANCES. A. OVERSIZE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. accessoo- structure approved herein « *f Eddbit W3A attached. strucjuresthe landscaping plan attached as Exhibit B-13B. Tlie omy o^ ----- ----- appro^d 2EiS^“smmS^ located at the mainjentmee facility. Open storage bins located at the mainte^ce feo^ Concession stand and test station located near the tunnel.11. • • • 111. Conditional Use Permit 1. Adherence to the revised grading and vegetaUon Page 8 of 17 TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator March 11,1999 SUBJECT: #2469/2470 500 Orono Orchar'* Road Sketch Plan Review and Variances Zoning District: RR-1B Lot Area: (Existing) ____ One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acres) 38,346 s.f. Application: # The applicant has proposed a lot line rearrangement for properties located at 500 and 540 Orono Orchard Road. Steven and Jo Webster, property owners of 500 Orono Orchard Road, have requested the City consider a lot line rearrangement, vacation of the alley, and variances to permit construction of a garage within the required yard setbacks. The 540 Orono Orchard Road lot is owned by Kent and Sandra Larson. To permit a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement the Larson's must be a co applicant. They have not communicated to the City support of the change in access to their property. They would be required to construct a driveway with access from Orono Orchard Road. This property uses the alley for its only access. The Webster’s at 500 Orono Orchard Road have proposed a garage and residential addition that would place the garage on the property line adjacent to the alley. (Please see the attached site plan). The garage is required to meet a 50' setback from the property line, however variances have been granted that allow structures to be located closer to alleys elsewhere in the City, but none have been approved that would place a building on a property line. ____________ This application requires the following variances: Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B): To permit a side yard adjacent to the street (alley) setback of 0’ where 50' is required; to permit an 8' front yard setback where 50' is required; and to permit a 36.8' side yard adjacent to the street setback where 50' is required. §24i9n470 500/S40 Orono Orchard Road La Um Roarrangimeni/Vacaion/yarUmciS 4/19/99 Pagi I •f Pertinent Facts: 1.500, 540 and 550 Orono Orchard Road all have legal access and rights to the alley. The portion of the alley South of the Larson property is not developed. The amount of traffic using the alley is limited to only the Larson's. Variance approvals to allow residential additions would move the access to the Webster's property onto the alley rather than Dickenson Street. 2. 3. The majority of property owners in the locality support vacating the alley. Before variances for the garage and additional living space can be considered the issue of access to the subject properties should be resolved. 4. 5. 6. The alley is maintained and plowed by the City. The Minnetonka Bluffs subdivision was platted in 1887. The Larson's must be a willing applicant as the City cannot force a lot line rearrangement or a change in access to the 540 property. 7.The enclosed survey, completed by Coffin & Gronberg has provided evidence that the 'paved' alley is not entirely within die 'platted* alley. The Webster’s could back out of the proposed garage without entering directly to the alley. It is important to note that the Larson's are the only other user of the alley. ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards RR-IB (2 acre) Lot Area Lot Width Rear Yard Side Yard Street Yard Required 87,120 s.f.200’50'30’50 ’ 500 38,346 s.f.150 ’50'30’50 ’ 540 25,400 s.f. 100 ’50'30’50* Sewer Units Both properties have been assessed and provided with sewer units. •2469/J470 500/540 Orono Orchard Road Loi Line Rearrangemeni/Vacaiion/l^arlances 4/19/99 Rage! Access The 540 Orono Orchard Road lot has access from the alley only. The alley is maintained and plowed by the City of Orono. The Webster's property, located at 500 Orono Orchard Road, has access to directly to Dickenson Street. The property is not served by the alley. A new garage arrangement would take the access point off Dickenson and onto the alley. However, the City does require a 30' setback for garages that face the street. Because this is an alley it seems to be reasonable to allow a setback of less than 30 as only one other property will be using the alley for access. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff could support an alignment that would allow for a shorter distance tlm required between the new garage and the alley. The City has approved similar requests in the past. No buildings are allowed to be located on a property line as proposed by the applicant. The main concern is backing of vehicles directly onto a public alley. The site plan provided places the attached garage directly on the property line (alley). State Building and Fire Codes do not allow structure to be located within 3' of a property line. The applicant shall provide revised plans meeting minimum Building and Fire Code standards, and implementing plans in keeping with the intent of the Rural Residential Zoning District. Attachments A B C D E F G H I J K Application Description of Request Location Map Section Map Property Map Site Survey and Topography Site Plan Elevation View Floor Plan Property Records Permit Record K469/2470 SOO/540 Orono Orchard Rood Lot Lom R*arrangtmtiu/}'acailonfyariancti 4/19/99 Ragty A CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address AJ Application#, Date Receiv^ Amount Paid Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) oz. m Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired__^^6 «,*»^rC . /'7 . I (do) (do n@ also own the adjacent parcels of land. ■ Present use of property: -y* residential ___pother (specify)________ 2toning District:_____________________________________________ (month/year) APPLICANT Name 3o Wc Lsrfe,r- I m 1^1 1 w If I - ■ I - — I « ■ ■ ■■ Ml ■ III ■ ■■ I Address: >Tq-i City:, Phone (home) ^ Phonefworic'i ________Zip: ^09/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name v V Phone (home). Phone (wone);X Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ /Ocd. oorJ — Describe request in detail: ~/^ lThc> -hi (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width X Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) fAc.'-tu.if , HARDSUIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: |-lr^iv<:f Dc>.- > yUof ^ Ai\fy t,vi h\'\e fi oX I t l-h*> T^^e-xArt^^________________________ I ^ (attach' additional sheets if necessary) B • • Application, Description of Reouest 500 Orono Orchard Road, Steven and Jo Webster years. In thafum^ our°TarnH^has^gro^ from^^famili^o^ enjoyed over the last 5 little two-bedroom home has been maximized in every^rea ™^in Sling “ 3Sen'^Sdi«2;Z:t hazard to my family and to the users of the alleySay unnecessary «ee. everyone Involved ^ home. This solution would benefit status 0, u,e aileylhouid be -raSSrcSnr^^^^^^ R^Thatr^w 5« Oiono Orchard favor a vacation of the alle^ ^ designed alley and would In fact all S’lo move ttetisTso teefonhe °P“°"*>« less, would upon solution. ^ ^ ' ®^^®y®d in conjunction with the agreed sReNe iRO IAR& "y A r 3 Si o» 2^ • /I mWi\ y -fW->l £O c L^«*. JS- # ^ CD CJ 8 BARRETT AVE -vj in S rsi“ST TT TT TT 96 TT ■ST”90 1 TT ;^:^•s %r\>0! a * -n Cd rvj —o<^-5?y *»io •s#tw oi 1/1 __ y.. *•>•• ( yj#□ " — # K. «•_ • y. •* » - TW Ul ................ 3)015" y'.. 2^ •r 1 ( o>^ KJ ojS m ~ — 9 1 w -S2-JEL -2L J£L S)90 ».50 -2L JS. S CO HANLON AVE l\^ \ 106^"IT •ir w OJ - Ci"'gc i‘ >• >« 1 1 ,-C- K «3? 8! S "y • M Hi _ZL smr ^erw - *-5T Ttr -35-ran i vU (ho ra #wJ fw r>a C7> Ol^tw ijd CO O 1 Hennepin touiuy/ munuauia C?rioiH 1 a 'Dickenson St reef i= be vi o. c -p J <> •• .......CQ^ |5 MeBr4iy 6 o s. A *1 11 •• ••.:-1.L. Sb** * ****** O 51 ,s • .. , ^ *• , • •. '■! • S. 1 i o ^■■ ]1 ) 1 O I •f ’ C ril • .•^ * •« §• 1 “*• . ^ —r- r • • • • • • • •'« i: hr. V • I .* I • ^ ; «» '••* .*' • • •• \ w X XXX ^ V ^ I wara»* I I M • *.. r^. * 5'..v.v ______JNl . .! .• ■ • ^ •7 * t*’)• ‘v: .• ini • ** • x.SL tV • '. -.VA-fh^T * ' iv • • • • •■. .' . '^.V - ,.-'iiv v <-/J?/ kii 3 ® •;.•• • /Bv • • • ■ • ■ • • • -'.;• ■^ • -isaas^-*.' -• ■•/..; Hgs Ifilslli ' ' ' ' ' '.11 !.!'. v’.'.. vH i C ^ - 9m »*' • -• ♦-H •> I I I J l:|l ^>v K - ) VT> T»vjo. • * : X .•> * ■«> :-v: ■ .V. S \ >• mu tfh'/iPfl; m V K • .*• ^ ' * ' - - •* ^ * - • •- '. . . > *1 • • • • • • • • • • • • 9 »- * .• iV ' •'■ :•-•■ ^ -vy. • %■ y-. '0 P^!y •w- ■^a^xi^ l :v* • ‘ * *. * ^' , **• ■ V / j. 'V jj\ 7 »'x‘ o-FEB-1999 17:58:22 «=*===«============'-==- -= Hennepin COMPLETE Tax Report ID #: 0211723310046 PROPERTY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL J tax YEAR: 1998 roperty Information .DDRESS •ITY/TWN LAIL CITY iCtiOOL DIS \DDITION .jEGAL DESC PARCEL SZ EAR BUILT 540 ORONO WAY Z AT A ORONO MINNETONKA BLUFFS LOTS 19 20 AND 21 150 X 129.4 1915 BARRETT AVE ZIP: 55391-9606 LOT: ACRES BLK: .00 wner/Taxpayer Information ^;TNER NAME JT OWNER : JAFFRAY ROBERT T : JAFFRAY VICTORIA If TAXPAYER ADDRESS : 540 BARRETT AVE : ORONO MN 55391- ”arket Values 1 Taxes - Effective 1998 I Subrecord Values LAND : BLDG : TOTAL: 44,000 1 BASE T/OC : 114.000 1 TAX W/ASSMT: 158.000 1 2,501.51 1 WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK 2,530.58 1 DELINQUENT: CURRENT 1 GREEN ACRES/OPEN SPACES: N‘J Sales _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ RECENT DATE : 05/13/98 RECENT PRICE: 254,000 RECENT CODE : WARRANTY DEED PREVIOUS DATE : PREVIOUS PRICE: PREVIOUS CODE : Dwelling Characteristics _ _ _ __ - __ Gross Sq Ft : 1477 Bldg Style Stories : First Fir SF Secnd Fir SF Year Built Bedrooms Baths Family/Livg Rm Dine/Othr Rm rCitchen Fireplaces Heat Air 916 561 1915 2 1 1 / / FORCED HOT AIR Bldg Shape Bldg Cond Bldg Constr Roof Type/Covor Ext Wall Gar Cap/Type/Sf Deck/Patio Sf Porch O/S/G Sf Pool/Pool sf Lot Width/Depth Lot Zoning VERY GOOD N/A GAMBREL / METAL METAL / / / / / 150/ 128 _ _ _Bmst_ »> ROOM SCHEDULE «< 1st_ _ _ _ _2nd_3rd h;/- WEBSTER STEVEN. CRS on FmbruaiV 19.1999 srssssssa::ssss! 16-FED-1999 17:50:35 -----““"'"cOMPLETE Tax Report PID # : 0211723310006 PROPERTY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL TAX YEAR: 1998 Property Information ADDRESS CITY/TWN MAIL CITY SCHOOL DIS ADDITION legal desc PARCEL SZ YEAR BUILT 550 ORONO WAY Z AT A ORONO MINNETONKA BLUFFS LOTS 6 7 18 AND 19 100 X 256 1915 ORONO ORCHARD RD ZIP: 55391- LOT: ACRES BLK: .00 Owner/Taxpayer Information OWNER NAME: NELSON LAWRENCE E JT OWNER : TAXPAYER ADDRESS LAWRENCE E NELSON 550 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA I4N 55391- Market Values LAND : BLDG : TOTAL: 53,000 53,000 106,000 Taxes - Effective 1998 I Subrecord Values TAX : 1,417.94 I WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK TAX W/ASSMT: 1,437.44 I DELINQUENT: CURRENTTAX W/A&&ni ^ green ACRES/OPEN SPACES: NO Sales RECENT DATE : RECENT PRICE: RECENT CODE : 01/26/90 91,000 PREVIOUS DATE : PREVIOUS PRICE: PREVIOUS CODE : Dwelling Characteristics Gross Sq Ft 880 First Fir SF Secnd Fir SF Year Built Bedrooms Baths Family/Livg Rm Dine/Othr Rm Kitchen Fireplaces Heat Air 712 168 1915 3 1 / / 1 1 GRAVITY Bldg Style Stories Bldg Shape Bldg Cond Bldg Constr Roof Typo/Cover Ext Wall Gar Cap/Type/Sf Deck/Patio Sf Porch 0/S/G Sf Pool/Pool sf Lot Width/Depth Lot Zoning VERY GOOD N/A GAMBREL / METAL METAL 1 / DETACHED / / / / / 100/ 270 312 96 >» ROOM SCHEDULE <«_ L wfBSTBRSTEVeN.cnSonHbnmrYl9^19iL i ^ To The Planning Commission of ORONO: I, SWtV^t A»1 I platted alley from Dickenson to my property at 'Or.access. i would have no objections to the vacating of the alley , have no future Interest in using the for < ^d. Sincerely Sign U C c. i6}j t A V. U Print ■^"o LL-ic^^-Icy Date To The Planning Commission of ORONO: I. \X^uic:.^oA)________. have no future Interest in using the platted^lley from Dickenson to my property at£7^ for access, i would have no objections to the vacating of the alley. Sincerely / /cWlr/j Sign 'Print Date urn tail 16-FEB-1999 17:50:35 Hennepin COMPLETE Tax Report PID # : 0'ni723310011 PROPERTY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL TAX YEAR: 1998 Property Information ADDRESS CITY/TWN MAIL CITY SCHOOL DIS ADDITION LEGAL DESC PARCEL SZ YEAR BUILT 570 ORONO WAYZATA ORONO MINNETONKA BLUETS LOTS 16 AND 17 100 X 127.8 1947 ORONO ORCHARD EU) ZIP: 55391- lot: ACRES BLK: .00 Owner/Taxpayer Information GfWNER NAME: HAWKINSON ROGER J JT OWNER : TAXPAYER ADDRESS ROGER J HAWKINSON 570 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 Market Values LAND : BLDG : TOTAL: 42.000 83.000 125,000 Taxes - Effective 1998 I Subrecord Values I BASE TAX : 1,649.26 I WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK TAX W/ASSMT: 2,066.46 | DELINQUENT: CURRENT 1 GREEN ACRES/OPEN SPACES: NO Sales ^ _ _ _ _ RECENT DATE : RECENT PRICE: RECENT CODE : PREVIOUS DATE : PREVIOUS PRICE: PREVIOUS CODE : Dwelling Characteristics Gross Sq Ft 2050 First Fir SF Secnd Fir SF. Year Built Bedrooms Baths Family/Livg Rm Dine/Othr Rm Kitchen Fireplaces Heat Air 1336 714 1947 5 1 / / 1 I FORCED HOT AIR Bldg Style Stories Bldg Shape Bldg Cond Bldg Constr Roof Type/Covor Ext Wall Gar Cap/Type/Sf Deck/Patio Sf Porch O/S/G Sf Pool/Pool Sf Lot Width/Depth Lot Zoning GOOD N/A GAMBREL / METAL STUCCO 1 / DETACHED / 292 / 29 / / / 100/ 128 292 »> ROOM SCHEDULE «< WEBSTER STFVfN CMS on Fabnurv 1$. IfH ---^ w To The Planning Commission of ORONO: 1-y‘fZW \\i iT^': f-if'- f\ have no futurepterest in using the platted alley from Dickenson to my property at. r access. I would have no objections to the vacating of the alley. Sincerely Sign a'. //Hrt Print 16-FEB-1999 17:52:50 ==#12 PID # Hennepin COMPLETE Tax Report # : 0211723310010 PROPERTY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL TAX YEAR: 1998 Property Information \DDRESS CITY/TWN •lAIL CITY SCHOOL DIS \DDITI0N LEGAL DESC PARCEL SZ YEAR BUILT 1390 FOX ST ORONO WAY Z AT A ORONO MINNETONKA BLUFFS LOTS 13 14 AND 15 127.75 X 150 1920 ZIP: 55391-9326 LOT: ACRES BLK: .00 Owner/Taxpayer Information OWNER NAME: WITCHER JOMATHAII D JT OWNER : WITCHER GRETA M TAXPAYER ADDRESS 1390 FOX ST ORONO MN 55391- Market Values LAND : BLDG : TOTAL: 44.000 66.000 110,000 Taxes - Effective 1998 I Subrecord Values BASE TAX • 2,576.22 1 WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK TAX W/ASSMT: 2,596.46 | DELINQUENT: CURRENTTAX W/ASSMT. , ■ aCRES/OPEN SPACES: NO Sales RECENT DATE : 10/12/9« RECENT PRICE: 123,700 <-onp RECENT CODE : WARRANTY DEED PREVIOUS CODE PREVIOUS DATE : PREVIOUS PRICE: Dwelling Characteristics Gross Sq Ft First Fir SF Secnd Fir SF Year Built Bedrooms Baths Family/Livg Rm Dine/Othr Rm Kitchen Fireplaces Heat Air 1470 861 609 1920 5 2 1 / / WATER Bldg Style Stories Bldg Shape Bldg Cond Bldg Constr Roof Type/Cover Ext Wall Gar Cap/Type/Sf Deck/Patio Sf Porch O/S/G Sf Pool/Pool Sf Lot Width/Depth Lot Zoning »> ROOM SCHEDULE «< AVERAGE + N/A GAMBREL / METAL STUCCO 1 / DETACHED /280 / / /76 / 128/150 hy? WEBSTER STEVEN. CHS on FDnwy 19,199$. —^ To The Planning Commission of ORONO: 16-FEB-1999 17:55:10 PIO # Honnrpin COMPLETE Tax Report : 02^1723310013 PROPERTY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL TAX YEAR: 1998 Property Information ADDRESS CITY/TWN MAIL CITY SCHOOL DIS ADDITION LEGAL DESC PARCEL SZ YEAR BUILT 500 ORONO WAYZATA ORONO MINNETONKA BI.UFFf HANLON AVE ZIP: 55391-9636 50 X 129.48 1949 LOT; ACRES BLK: .00 Owiier/Taxpayer Information OWNER NAME: BENNETT P & M JT OWNER : TAXPAYER ADDRESS PAUL A & MEGAN M BENNETT 500 HANLON AVE : WAYZATA MN 55391-9636 Market Values 1 Taxes - Effective 1998 I 1 Subrecord Values LAND : BLDG : TOTAL: - - - - - -- -1 37.000 1 80.000 1 117,000 1 BASF. T/X : TAX W//.SSMT: 1,483.25 1 1,503.36 1 1 WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK DELINQUENT: CURRENT GREEN ACRES/OPEN SPACES: NO Sales RECENT DATE ; 02/25/97 RECENT PRICE; 125,000 RECENT CODE : WARRANTY DEEl» PREVIOUS DATE : 07/10/91 PREVIOUS PRICE: PREVIOUS CODE ; Dwelling Characteristics Gross Sq Ft 1710 First Fir SF Secnd Fir SF Year Built Bedrooms Baths Family/Livg Rm Dine/Othr Rm Kitchen E’ireplaces Heat Air 1080 630 1949 5 O / / FORCED HOT AJR Bldg Style Stories Bldg Shape Bldg Cond Jldg Constr Roof Type/Covor Ext Wall Gar Cap/Type/Sf Deck/Patio Sf Porch 0/S/G Sf Pool/Pool Sf Lot Width/Depth Lot Zoning AVERAGE + N/A GAMBREL / METAL METAL / / 320 / 32 / / / 50/ 128 Bmst » ROOM SCHEDULE «< 1st _2nd 3rd Pnptnt! fty: WEBSTER STEVEN. CRS on P^bwarv 19. |»f_ To The Planning Commission of ORONO: I, ( f j_______, have no future interest In using the platted alley from Dickeiison to my property at for access. I would have no objections to the vacating of the alley. Sincerely L6-FEB-1999 17:52:50 »====r=«====«=========-»---- -- Hennepin COMPLETE Tax Report #10 ?ID # : 0211723310009 PROPERTY TYPE; RESIDENTIAL TAX YEAR: 1998 Property Information 2\DDRESS 3ITY/TWN MAIL CITY SCHOOL DIS ADDITION LEGAL DESC PARCEL SZ YEAR BUILT FOK ST1380 ORONO WAY Z AT A C)RONO MINNETONKA BLUFF:.' LOTS 10 11 AND 1 ! 150 X 127.75 1920 ZIP; 55391-9326 LOT:BLK: ACRES .00 Owner/Taxpayer Information OWNER NAME: MEYER HERBERT D JT OWNER : TAXPAYER ADDRESS HERBERT D MEYF.R PO BOX 12 WAY Z AT A MN 55391-0012 Market Values LAND : BLDG : TOTAL: 44.000 87.000 131,000 Taxes - Effective 1998 I Subrecord Values I BASE TAX • 1,912.72 I WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK TAX W/ASSMT: 1,936.82 I DELINQUENT: CURRENTlAX w/A2,a ^ acres/open SPACES: NO Sales RECENT DATE : RECENT PRICE: RECENT CODE : PREVIOUS DATE : PREVIOUS PRICE: PREVIOUS CODE : Dwelling Characteristics Gross Sq Ft : 1701 First Fir SF Secnd Fir SF Year Built Bedrooms Baths Family/Livg Rm Dine/Othr Rm Kitchen Fireplaces Heat Air 1134 567 1920 4 2 / 1 / 1 5 FORCED HOT AIR Bldg Style Stories Bldg Shape Bldg Cond Bldg Constr Roof Type/Cover Ext Wall Gar Cap/Type/Sf Deck/Patio Sf Porch O/S/G Sf Pool/Pool sf Lot Width/Depth Lot Zoning GOOD N/A GAMBREL /METAL STUCCO 4 / DETACHED /750 / //48 / 129/150 >» ROOM SCHEDULE «< _frep»»d by: STEVEN. CPS on Ftbtvanf 19.1»9$_ TEVEN'S & JO ELLEN WEB .0 ORONO ORCHARD RD S I'.YZATA MN 55391- S/NDRA S LARSON 1540 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55356- Syo oP^cWo Ur\CKA?»H LAWRENCE E NELSON 550 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA MN 55391- 1 \OGER J HAWKINSON *70 ORONO ORCHARD RD S AYZATA MN 55391- PrmpmtmH by: WEBSTeR STEVEN. CRS on FatonwfV U, IW> r»obc.*V * 540 BARRETT AVE 540 BARRETT AVE ORONO IlN 55391- ORONO MN 55391 540 BARRETT AVE ORONO MN 55391- • • 540 BARRETT AVE ORONO MN 55391 PnoBndbv: WEBShlR STEVEfi. CRS on Ftbnurv 1$. im Permit Wo. infTi ^OO (Q<o^o (^CLtdJnO--<jc^^ y^cJ <S ^ PERMIT RECORD Date n-^<i9n if- i^'SJ It-13- Type of Permit Ourv^piAj/^ tinecH SG‘U^e< tiOttro p TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: April 13,1999 SUBJECT: #2476 Chris Diesen 1100 Townline Road __________Sketch Plan Review Zoning Dbtrict: RR-IA One Family Rural Residential District (5 Acre) Lot Area: Application: 13+Acres The applicant has proposed a two lot subdivision for property located at 1100 Townline Road. The property is 13+ acres in size, with 11 acres dry buildable. A house has existed on the property since 1932, and proposed tu remain on the property following subdivision. Staff and the Subdivider have worked together to develop a lot layout appropriate for the RR-IA (5 acre) Zoning District. The existing Tim. Townline Road parcel is only 504’ in width. Lots in the Zoning Distn."* require 300' of width to be considered buildable. The Subdivider hij established a plan that will require the City grant lot width variances for both lots. Both proposed lots would be over the 5 acre minimum lot size with 2 acres dry contiguous. Pertinent Ordinance: IQ 27 RR-IA ONE FAMILY RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Subd I Purpose. The "RR-IA" One Family Rural Residential District is intended to provide a district which will - allow a combination of low density residential development and limited agricultural activity. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any "RR-IA" One Family Rural Residential District, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: Any permitted use as regulated in the "R-1A District" §2476 Chris Dltssn UOO TownliM Road Sktteh Plan Rtvkw 4/19/99 Pagtl Btedat 1100 1 acres dry proposed kc ayout.^asis ustin^ ilCMJ ling Distri ct ^divider ices for both with 2 acres * Subd.3. Conditional Uses. Within any "RR-1 A" One Family Rural ResidcnUrf District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use pemut: A. Uses. Any conditional use as regulated in the "R-1 A" District except for "Duplex Credit" and "Animals". B. Farms (Stock). Provided that the area is ten or more acres. Subd. 4. Accessory Uses. Within any "RR-1 A" One Family Rural Residential District, the following uses shall be a permitted accessory use. A. Any accessory use as regulated in the "R-1 A" District and "Animals" as regulated in Section 10.20, Subdivision 3, Subparagraphs M and N. Subd. 5. Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements. A. Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. B. Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 5 acres 300 feet 100 feet 50 feet 100 feet ANALYSIS ct is intended elopment and rntial District, Access Access to the property has always been by a driveway in the center of the property from Tov^me Road. The proposed northern lot has a wetland located across the entire width of the property Imes. The subdivider would like to use the existing driveway as a shared drive and have casements g^te over the driveway for use by the northern lot. This would eliminate the need for miUgatmg wetlands or disturbing the wetland existing on the Northwest comer of the lot. §2476 Chrlt DItstn IIOOTmmliMRoad Sktieh Flat 4/19/99 Fag»2 ict. [ion t as Easements utility Dtainagc easements shall be show as lO’ along the exterior lot lines and 5' on the internal lot lines. ♦•on aru\ flowaee easements over the wetlands on the property.?s:“^;sroSSr-sridentifi Septic ♦ w been determined to be non-conforming. Septic testing must be resulting in Right-of’Way Dedication ^ rfo??o^hXi: m i; standard in all subdivision applications. Attachments Application Location Map Section Map Existing Survey/Site Plan Site Topography Legal Descriptions Permit Record §2476 Chris Dki*n IlOOTowntUisRoael SkstehPloHKnkw 4/lW?9 Fafsi Application # Date Received 3/tuM? Amount Paid ^SO ^ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION ^PLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION n v v V Site address //OO V^a .^ OMHAi^r TflAnfifiratinn Number rPIDl 30“ / / Si ** 3 ___3 IS'IYN Property Identification Number (PID) Please check one - Property ____abstract or -------torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT , X .1 \N Name C. K rMo9Vg.V ^ Address 4-o-ovv ------- City 3 Z oooz » Phone (home) *7*7 Q ^ Zip g$3S<l Phone (work) ^</5* g>7 PO OWNER (if different than ^licant) NA.ue tSrgSeVN Address \l0Q City AA^ftVe- ^N avxa ^ (attach list if more than one) Zip Phone (home) ^79*/jf/^9 Phone (work) _ Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units_ Other (specify)________ EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels ------------- Development Size ------------ Present use (check) ------------ Present Zoning District ------------ PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes * Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) I Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites ____Existing Units _______ New Units __Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per___Acres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land * .J ** IResidential Other (specify) moustxi MEDINA srr**''>mmpm- . •.^#5 •..*I12C0 “• . *■ .i inoAoj^*V* ^on 8C0 / 4C0 ♦»..CMlfPCWAU ORC BAnOI *ofOMcm 0 ^/ n MH P____ [sCNRSrilic 0 o 1m TAAJIS 3B INOCW IA4 M 11 •y w RCO OAX _;? C5sn 400 9 jP SI j*g»'^ri»-. #rf^*.'4aiArV V V.t *y »r?V*'* -*^-»• .* ^V*-**V*V*'**" •• .••• win WAXCIf 88 8C0 ^k^i^mortl -T^ .. *»?. ♦ i’Ai f »•# 2 4 7 6 . 1 . • .' I ■Cjjiki j \V N ..... N 1 / •::; "T ] li rUte-. r &. x.jam^ / / \ •• /y \ \ MS*// \ . / / ' / • 4 X 7 [ryX'-j^x ' 5' \\ \‘V * \ \ ' \ / ' ■ v\.' \ V V (7 U J- .-. . 'V -—•• ■ / / / 7 '■ " -?o#7v ^ ■c»7<7 ■., \ ■ ■ ■)Vk I « P .! / ♦ / I • r y '• I X ' ' Ii | ; V. 4r11 , i f / //// .■ / • ! 'i,/A.L_ji7i ■' ///!' / I h <r’ 1/.v-./ ) ;i ! I ' n i > ' / • /^4 » «■_ -^7 \ ^ 'tj ft \ \ \ / \ ( ' i»0B.' (( o***-^\ / I ^Vl' l‘///W /l___i \ t ' II \7' ■>■ ///// }, 1 [ U ^ .^ . ).- •'-'^■'~<V / \o<,' \/ .^ • • i ' —^ .........— VI/- ' y ' ■ , • ' ^ ) •M.) • • ^ • • £Xlsr/A/& leanV/eficr A |5:i jrw—08 follov/s: . Commendnrr' aV ^ e NW| of SWj of Section said NWj of'SWj 95^,35 feet North West line of NV/i of SWi; tbencrEast 1220.63 feet. corner, of the said the E^st line of cald NWi of .SW^^<27*• wj th the South 1 In*? of said NWj or |wi iporS^w® 1}!?®^?^ ''he^d NWi of SWi thence feet to the Westline of the-said NW| of SWi thenCe feet, to the West • • •• * •• • • * •TRACTB • • • The South 6.02 acres of the.Nonh 15.72 acres of the West 35.95 acri of thi t ^ NorAw« Quarter of the Southwea Quarter of Section 30, Towtiship 118 Ranae 23, Hennepin County, MN. l: I lOtmm PERMIT RECORD Permit Mo. -VV^-3 Date 5*-l/'7L Type of Permit t^ecu 2kiLt. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (#2457 Paula and David Undberg, continued) proposing 7.32 percent hardcover in the 0-75' setback to construct a driveway. The Applicants are not requesting hardcover in the 0-75' setback on the north side of the property. Van Zomeren stated no comments have been received from the adjoining property owners regarding this application. Undberg stated a hardship exists due to the two 0-75' lakeshore setback areas. Chair Smith commented that the Planning Commission appreciates the revisions to the plan to bring the structural coverage into compliance, but in her view the Applicants should attempt to further reduce hardcover to the existing 29 percent or the allowable hardcover limit of 25 percent. Smith stated that the Planning Commission's view is that new structure should meet the 25 percent hardcover limit whenever possible. Undberg noted that they have pulled the house back from the lake. Smith suggested that the Applicants take another look at possibly reducing hardcover in the 75-250' setback. Hawn indicated she would prefer the Applicants limit hardcover cioser to 25 percent and would allow the 810 feet necessary for the driveway in the 0-75' setback area. Hawn inquired if the residence meets the allowable 25 percent and the driveway is factored in, how much the total hardcover would be. Van Zomeren stated the hardcover would be over by 302 square feet if the driveway is not factored in. McMillan stated she Is in agreement with Hawn in that the Applicants should reduce hardcover closer to the 25 percent limit, and that the Applicants may want to look at reducing or eliminating the porch in order to lower hardcover. Lindquist commented the Planning Commission is looking for the Applicants to reduce hardcover by 302 square feet. Van Zomeren indicated the Applicants will need to lower structural coverage to 4600 square feet. Schroeder indicated the Applicants are proposing to reduce hardcover in the 0-75' setback by moving the house. Undberg stated he would be willing to look at ways to further reduce hardcover. Hawn stated the application should be reviewed by the Planning Commission after the revisions are made since it will require changes to the design. There were no public comments. Smith indicated that in her view the Applicant should reduce hardcover to at least 30 percent in the 75-250' setback and leave the other hardcover as is. Smith noted that the Applicants have been a significant improvement in the 0-75' setback by moving the house away from the lake. Smith stated the Applicants will need to appear before the Planning Commission again to have the revisions reviewed. Page 3 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (#2457 Paula and David Undberg, continued) Van Zomeren stated the next Planning Commission meeting is set for April 19th, and if the application is approved, then it would go to the April 26 City Council meeting. Hawn Inquired whether a conditional use permit is necessary for this application. Van Zomeren stated the final resolution will need to have uage included which roells out that some work will be done in the 0<75' setback to remove trte v^undation and to put the grade back to what was existing. Van Zomeren stated a grading and drainage plan will need to be submitted. Undberg inquired if he reduces the garage by 260 square feet, whether that would satisfy the Planning Commission's concerns. McMillan stated the Applicant should attempt to reduce it by 300 square feet. Hawn indicated she was in agreement with McMillan. McMillan stated the Applicant should review the application very closely and not make a quick decision tonight. Smith stated it appears the consensus of the Planning Commission Is to have the Applicants reduce structural coverage to 30 percent. Smith inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to table this application for a month in order to allow him time to submit revised plans. Undberg indicated he would be willing to table the application. Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application #2457,1392 Baldur Park Road, to allow the Applicant time to revised plans reducing structural coverage to 30 percent. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#4) #2455 PROPOSED ZONING AMENDMENT: LK-1C-1 DENSITY CREDIT Gaffron stated the Planning Commission had reacted favorably to eliminating the 50 percent density credit in the LR-1C-1 district at their February meeting. It was further suggested that retention of the ability in LR-1C-1 to create attached dwelling units would enable clustering and the preservation of trees and green space that is not possible in the LF 1C zone. Elimination of the 50 percent credit without retaining the ability for attached units would remove any distinguishing characteristics between the LR-1C and LR-1C-1 Districts. In this case, it would be most appropriate to eliminate the LR-1C-1 designation from the zoning code, and rezone all LR-1C-1 properties to LR-1C. City Staff would like to see the hardcover standards amended in the LR*1C<1 zone to keep the code consistent if the City decides to keep this zone. Gaffron stated that the City has received a letter from Paul Larson who has indicated that he is in opposition to the proposed elimination of the 50 percent density credit because it will reduce the value of his property by eliritinating 1/3 of the potential dwelling units he might be allowed under the current code. Chair Smith inquired whether there were any public comments regarding this amendment. Page 4 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH IS, 1999 (#2458 Proposed Zoning Amendment, continued) Nancy Mead, 30 Interlocken Lane, inquired whether this item could be tabled in order to allow her brother. Paul Larson, to attend the meeting to express his concerns regarding the proposed amendment. Mead indicated her brother will be out of town for the next few days. Monica Brown. Brown Road South, stated she had a question regarding clustering. Smith stated that is one option that could be utilized. Gaffron stated that any property that took advantage of the PRO standards would have to cluster. If the resident chose to do a straight subdivision, you could have 1/2 acre lots under the proposed ordinance without having to cluster. Gaffron remarked that this proposed zoning amendment only affects the LR-1C-1 district, which is less than 30 acres. Hawn inquired if you have to do either a PRD or a subdivision so that you cannot take a two acre lot and have a three unit building with a single home. Gaffron stated if you take a two acre site, such as the Larson property, under the standard 1/2 acre zoning, you could potentially construct four units, but under standard plat, you have to exclude the area of the road, so it's likely that you would only have three units. Under a PRD, under the proposed zoning, you can have two attached units, but you cannot have a single unit under this zoning amendment. Hawn stated she was in favor of option one, but had some concerns that Larson was not in attendance at tonight's meeting to express his views. Hawn inquired whether compensation is available to those property owners who would be affected by this ordinance. Gaffron stated the City has not offered compensation to property owners affected by zoning changes in the past. Schroeder remarked that this zoning amendment is not directed at any single piece of property. McMillan inquired whether he would be able to attend the March 22 City Council meeting. Mead commented that she expected her brother back in two to three days and that he should be able to attend Monday's meeting. Gaffron stated if the Planning Commission takes action on this item tonight, it will be presented to the City Council at the March 22 meeting. Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, recommending that District LR*1C*1 be amended to eliminate 50 percent density credit but allow attachment of units via PRD to remain, adding Shoreland reference and revising hardcover standard. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. NEW BUSiNESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS (#5) #2444 BRIAN AND SUSAN SCHEBLER, 1354 REST POINT CIRCLE • VARIANCE, 7:33 p.m. - 8:02 p.m. Brian and Susan Schebler, Applicants, were present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting an after-the-fact variance to pen«:it a detached. Page 5 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2444 Brian and Susan Schebler, continued) ground level deck located on the lakeside of the residence. The deck is located 86 feet from the Ordinary High Water Level of Lake Minnetonka. Weinberger stated a number of permits were issued in 1989 to allow for a large addition to the home in 1989. Following a recent survey by Gronberg, it was determined that some hardcover that was requested to be iemoved at that time was still existing. Approval was subject to the previous property owners removing a gravel parking area on the property and reducing the size of the driveway. City Staff recommends that the gravel parking area located on the north part of the property remain in that it is used for parking by the home owners and provides an area for snow storage. The rock located around the driveway protects this portion of the property from erosion as much of the drainage in this area follows the slope. This is a difficuit area to maintain due to the steep slope that exists. Weinberger stated the hardcover worksheets completed by the surveyor include areas that were called hardcover but under derinition are not necessarily hardcover because a plastic underiayment does not exist. One area is located near the driveway and the second area is located in front of the house on the lakeside. Staff is not recommending that the Applicants remove any of this hardcover since it protects the area from erosion. Weinberger noted that the hardcover in the 75-250* setback comprises 30.24 percent, which still requires a variance. Weinberger stated all other lot requirements are met by the proposal and is not subject to average lakeshore setback. The Planning Commission needs to determine whether this type of development would have been approved if the Applicants had obtained the appropriate permits before construction of the deck. City Staff is recommending approval of the after-the-fact variance due to the hardship that exists on the property in that mt/oh of the hardcover that exists on the property is necessary for erosion control and some public purpose. Chair Smith inquired whether those two areas were the only two areas requested to be removed. Weinberger stated that the Scheblers have voluntarily removed some hardcover on the property. Smith inquired whether back in 1989 any other hardcover was supposed to have been removed that has not been. Weinberger stated just the driveway and the rock were requested to be removed. Schebler stated they have been attempting to clean up the property and reduce hardcover. Smith inquired whether there should be a condition that no additional hardcover be allowed on this property. Hawn stated she has a problem with this application and that hardcover needs to be further reduced. Hawn remarked she would not have granted a va.dance to allow the deck and would ask that the Applicants remove the deck. McMillan stated she was In agreement that the hardcover needs to be reduced. Schroeder stated he was not in favor of this application. Pages ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (#2444 Brian and Susan Schabler, continued) Schebler stated a lot of hardcover has already been removed, with the deck being designed to allow the water to seep into the ground. Schebler indicated he will continue to reduce hardcover on this lot wherever possible. Schroeder commented that most of what Schebler has removed has not been counted in the hardcover figures. Mrs. Schebler stated they were told they could have a deck on the property. Smith commented that it appears the Planning Commission is recommending that the deck be removed. Mrs. Schebler stated that they could perhaps remove the rock around the house. Smith inquired whether this application should be tabled to see if additional hardcover can be removed. Schebler stated the driveway probably cannot be reduced. Lindquist commented he has a problem with using gravel as a tradeoff. Weinberger remarked there may be some confusion over the fact that there are other times when garages and decks are granted, but there is nothing in the code that states that a garage or a deck would be granted simply because a lakeshore property is without one. Schebler remarked he would be willing to have this application tabled and meet with City Staff in an effort to reduce hardcover. There were no public comments. Schroeder moved, Smith seconded, to table Application #2444,1354 Rest Point Circle, to allow the Applicants time to reduce legitimate hardcover by a minimum of 900 square feet. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#6) #2461 CHRIS PIERSON. ON BEHALF OF BRYSONS/JOHNSONS. 650,660,670,660 BID ISLAND, LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT, 8:03 p.m. - 8:22 p.m. Chris Pierson, on behalf of the Applicants, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a lot line rearamgement and lot combination for lots located at 650-660-670^80 Big Island. The lots are currently three separate seasonal residences on four tax parcels that are to be combined into two parcels. The Applicants are proposing to combine Lots 3.4 and one-half of Lot 5 to create one tax parcel on Big Island, and the center lot would be split and added to the 650 lot. Weinberger remarked the main issues to address would be the future of the existing cabin located on Lot 5. Fire Code does not allow a structure to exist this close to the property line. There are also exists some zoning code requirements which would require variances to be granted to allow a residence to be located this close to a lot line, and a conditional use permit would be necessary to allow a guest cabin. Current' ,/ City Code does not allow two principal residences to be located Page? ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (#2461 Chris Pierson, continued) on one lot. The Applicants are proposing to keep the existing cabin, which Staff cannot support, and Staff has stated the cabin on Lot 5 shaii be removed prior to the fiiing of the subdivision with Hennepin County. The State Buiiding Code does not aliow buiidings to be located within three feet of property boundaries. Weinberger stated this proposed lot line rearrangement would reduce density on Big isiand and the eventual removal of structure and hardcover and returning the area more to its natural appearance. Currently the cabin located on Lots 5 and 6 shares a well located to the south, which would be moved to 650 property should the lot line reamangement be approved, and also shares a septic system serving the property at 670. Staff is requesting that the septic lines be capped, and the proposal would be one septic site for one residence. Staff is also requesting that the easements and any other agreements relating to the well and septic systems be vacated and eliminated. At the time this was platted, there would not have been drainage and utility easements to vacate over the old property line, but Staff is requesting that there be five feet on each side of the interior property line and ten feet across the rear of the property line for drainage and utility easements. Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rearrangement to create the two tax parcels with Lots 3,4, and 5 making up one parcel, and Lots 6,7. and 8 making up the other parcel. Staff is requesting that the cabin located on Lot 5 be removed, along with the deck, stairway, sidewalk, and removal of the shed, prior to the filing of the subdivision with Hennepin County. Staff is also requesting that title opinions be delivered to the City for Lots 3 through 8. Pierson stated the property was acquired from Betty Fisher who had requested at the time of purchase that the cabin remain for a period of time due to sentimental reasons, which was agreed to by Bryson and Johnson. Chair Smith inquired what the use of the cabin will be should it remain on the property. Bryson indicated that they have no intentions on utilizing the cabin and are willing to remove it in two to three years. Johnson stated, if possible, they would like the cabin to remain for the next five years, but if the Planning Commission decided otherwise, they would be willing to remove the cabin. There were no public comments. Lindquist indicated he would be agreeable to allowing the cabin to remain on the property for two years. Smith commented that the only issue with this application appears to be the cabin. Weinberger remarked that City Staff does have concerns regarding enforcement should the cabin not be removed. Pierson stated the City could require that the cabin be removed, and if not, a court order for its removal could be issued. Lindquist commented a bond could be required at a reasonable cost. It was the consensus of the Planning Commi.«ision to allow the cabin to remain for two and a half Pages ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1999 (#2451 Chris Pitrson, continusd) years. Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, recommending approval of Application #2461, 650,660,670, and 660 Big Island, subject to removal of the cabin located on Lot 5, along with the deck, stairway, steps and shed within the sideyard setback, within the next 30 months, filing of the subdivision be completed shortly after approval by the City Council; further subject to vacation of the utility, well, and drainage easements shortly after approval by the City Council of the lot line rearrangement, with the appropriate drainage and utility easements being granted to the City as requested by City Staff, and a title opinion will be completed and a copy provided to the City prior to filing of the subdivision. This approval is also based on the understanding that the cabin located on Lot 6 will not be used during the next 30 months. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Schroeder requested that the Applicants draft the appropriate agreements subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. (#7) #2462 DAVID LOVELACE, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 220 BIG ISLAND - VARIANCE. 0:25 p.m. - 6:37 p.m. David Lovelace. Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a lot area variance to create a buildable lot on Big Island. The existing lot is 4.3 acres where 5 acres is the minimum lot size for building. Weinberger stated access to the lot is an issue, noting that there are a number of platted right-of- ways within Big island, which would allow access to the lot. In 1083, most lots on Big Island were granted automatic lot area variances when the island was rezoned to RS. The previous properly owner never filed their application to have their automatic lot area variance granted, making it a record lot, and the time period has expired for a free automatic variance. Staff recommends approval of the variance to permit 220 Big Island to be a buildable lot, and to waive the one year expiration for the variance. Weinberger stated the main issue is access to the tot for docking rights. It should be not. that City Code requires that docks on Big Island are for the use of the owners and their guests and not to bo loaned or rented for money, if the Applicant requested dock space, a permit would need to be issued by the City Council. City Staff is also requesting that an existing cabin, which is currently in ruins, be removed prior to construction prior to any building permit being issued. Lovelace stated an agreement exists where restricts construction on the north area of the property, noting he is willing to remove the old cabin that currently exists on the parcel. Weinberger remarked that an easement granted by the previous property owner as a conservation area to the north to avoid any new stmcture being constructed in that area, and the Applicant has agreed to file a copy of the easement with the City and have it placed it on the title. Lovelace indicated at this time he does not have an intention to store boats on Big Island, but would like to have a permit issued to have a dock on the property. Page 9 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2462 David Lovalaca, continued) Weinberger stated the previous owner did have dock rights with the neighboring property owner, which was grandfathered in. Schroeder indicated that access to this iot should be granted before approval of this application is given. Lindquist indicated he would be willing to approve this application subject to access being granted by the City Council. Schroeder suggested that this application be tabled until access is obtained. Lovelace indicated he will not be obtaining any building permits unless access is obtained. Chair Smith inquired whether ttiere were any public comments concerning this application. Gerald Walsh, 180 Big Island, commented that there are three public accesses available. Smith remarked that the residents are not allowed to leave their mode of transportion on the public right-of-way. Rodney MInnich, 340 Old Crystal Bay South, commented that the Applicant could buy an aquatic car. Smith stated the issue is that the residents cannot leave their mode of transportation on public land. McMillan inquired whether there were suitable septic sites available. Lovelace commented that the septic inspector has found three or four sites which will probably be suitable for his use. Lovelace stated a mound system would be required if he builds in excess of 800 square feet. Hawn moved, McMillan seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2462, granting of a lot area variance to create a buildable lot at 220 Big Island, subject to access being obtained and septic issues being resolved. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#8) ROBERT ERICKSON, 364 and 372 WESTLAKE STREET. LOT UNE REARRANGEMENT, 8:38 p.m. - 9:10 p.m. Robert Erickson. Applicant, along with Mike Cronin, were present. Weinberger stated the Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan for the proposed iot line rearrangement at their November, 1998 meeting. The Applicant has revised the ^ans slightly. Currently Lot 9. the 364 property, is a narrow parcel consisting of .65 acres, and the property located at 372 Westlake Street consists of 2.01 acres, which makes it a conforming lot. 372 Westlake Street has a residence currently situated on it, which is being occupied at the present time, along with two guest cabins. The lot was assessed for only one sewer unit aHhough it does contain the three separate dwelling units. The property currently is not hooked up to sanHary sewer, and the owners have indicated that they will hookup to sanitary sewer upon approval of their application. Page 10 T, ¥er. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999(Robert Erickson, continued)Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rearrangement as proposed on the survey subject to the Applicant granting easements 10 feet along the exterior property lines and five feet aiong interior property lines; removal of all existing structures on both the 364 and 372 A/estlake Street prior to the filing of the lot line rearrangement; the on-site sewage treatment systr;m located on the 372 lot be removed and the grade restored to the existing conditions shown on the survey; granting of variances for both lots for lot area to create buildabie lots; and that the property located at 372 Westlake Street pay a SAC fee and connect to sanitary sewer Mike Cronin requested that the Planning Commission implement the previous approval subject to City Staffs recommendations. There were no public comments. Hawn indicated she has a problem with taking a conforming lot and making it non-conforming. Smith indicated there is an issue regarding sewer. Hawn inquired whether the assessment has ever been paid for the hookup. Cronin indicated that the assessment has been paid but not the SAC charge. McMillan stated the lot should not require further building variances and creates a workable building pad. Lindquist commented that perhaps the condition that no further variances will be granted on this property. McMillan moved to recommend approval of Application #2465,364 and 372 Westlake Street, for a lot line rearrangement subject to City StafTs recommendations #1-5 outlined in their March 4,1999 memorandum, granting of a lot area variance and average lakeshore setback to allow both lots to be developed without further Planning Commission and City Council review; and further subject to the residence being removed by October, 1999. Erickson stated the previous owner has the right to occupy the residence until October of this year. Cronin indicated the Applicant would like to keep the residence until the lot is sold. Cronin stated they would be willing to remove all structures at 372 Westlake Street as soon as the appropriate arrangements are made. Weinberger stated the proposal would create a front and back lot subdivision, and no agreement has been reached with the Applicant regarding access. It is the City's position that the alley leading to the lake should not be vacated. McMillan inquired whether it was currently being used as access. Weinberger stated it is not. McMillan suggested that the City make improvements to this road and retain rights to it. Cronin stated that they are willing to take out the old blacktop at their expense and landscape that area if the City Council so desires, but at this time they would like to proceed forward with the Page 11 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (Robert Erickson, continued) lot line rearrangement. Schroeder commented that now is the time to discuss how access for emergency vehicles will be gained. Weinberger stated a cul-de-sac would be preferred by City Staff if an agreement can be reached. Erickson remarked that he has recently purchased the adjoining property consisting of .44 acres. Smith suggested that City Staff took at this situation and come up with some options for a driveway. Schroeder inquired whether this was an acceptable agreement with the Applicant. Cronin stated they are trying to avoid variances if possible and would like the Planning Commission to approve the tot line rearrangement. Smith stated approval should be contingent upon City Staff and Applicant agreeing to some dimensions for the cul-de-sac. McMillan amended her motion to include, subject to City Staff review and approval of an acceptable agreement regarding access. Motion was seconded by Lindquist VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (Recess taken from 9:10 p.m. • 9:16 p.m.) («9) #2466 JAMES RENCKENS, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 3020 WATERTOWN ROAD, 2 LOT SUBDIVISION, 0:16 p.m. -10:27 p.m. John Winston, on behalf of the Renckens, was present. Van Zomeren stated the Applicants are proposing to subdivide an 11.94 acre parcel into two lots. Lot 1 consists of 8.43 acres, with 7.30 acres being dry, and Lot 2 consists of 3.51 acres, with 2.73 acres being dry. Let 1 is considered a flag lot, subject to back lot standards. Lot 2 is a front lot. Both Lots 1 and 2 are proposed to have access onto Watertown Road. This subdivision is unique in the fact that one lot is platted in an east/west direction and the other lot is platted In a north/south direction. Van Zomeren stated the Park Commission has recommended accepting a park dedicatic-n fee in lieu of land for this subdivision. The Hennepin County Assessor has been asked to review the proposal and determine the fair market value of the undeveloped land. Steve Weekman has evaluated the proposed septic locations and has determined that a variance for the location of the draintield will be required. Van Zomernn remarked that a bam currently situated on the property will need to be removed. Tom Kellogg. City Engineer, has revised his letter so that the City's stormwater management plan, which calls for an 18 inch storm sewer to be Installed on this property, the recommendation for a Page 12 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2456 JaiTMs Renckent, continued) Van Zomeren indicated in her view the drainage and grading issues can be resolved. Smith commented that one of the significant Issues facing the Planning Commission is the future access to Lot 1 and whether an outlet will be necessary. Smith noted that the City has required outlots in the past, so that would be a consistent policy of the City that could be pursued. Van Zomeren stated the size of the back lot is more than double the minimum three acre requirement. Smith stated if this parcel is subdivided in the future, there will be some issues that will need to be addressed. Lindquist inquired whether an outlet needs to be created for road division. Van Zomeren remarked that the code discourages the use of flag lots, and in her view this lot should be defined as a flag lot/back lot. McMillan inquired whether with a flag lot an outlet needs to be created on the back lot. Van Zomeren commented that is one issue that is before the Planning Commission. Gaffron stated if the Planning Commission determines the northerly lot to be a back lot. City Code does not allow for the creation of the back lot without the 30 foot outiot. Smith stated in her view the northern access should be looked at rather than creating a narrow strip, and consideration needs to be given to the location of the septic site. Smith commented that perhaps access off of Watertown Road is one viable option for this development, or coming off the cukJe>sac at Crystal Creek. Van Zomeren stated an administrative vanance will need to be granted for the septic system due to the closeness of the site to the stormwater drainage pond. Van Zomeren remarked that she has not considered access off of the cui-de-sac at Crystal Creek as a legitimate access point but rather considered access off of Watertown Road. If the Planning Commission determines that access to that one lot will be allowed off ol Crystal Creek Road, then the preliminary and final plat resolutions for Crystal Creek need to be amended. Van Zomeren noted that If an easement is granted hrough the Crystal Creek subdivision. City Council needs to approve an amendment to the subdivision. UrKlquist commented that it was his understanding Crystal Creek Road was a private road and that the City does not have the ability to grant access off of that road. Schroeder stated if access cannot be provided, then the subdivision will have to be denied. Lindquist remarked that without approval for the private road, the Planning Commission realiy has no other option but to consider what is being presented tonight, which is a flag lot. Hawn remarked that without knowing the exact location of the septic system, it is difficult to approve this application. Dwight Post stated he is intending to purchase the lot in front, and he is not sure why the northern outJot was not provided for in the first place by the Crystal Creek developer. Post remarked In i:is opinion there are a lot of issues that are not in compliance now and the developer should have been made to comply with the codes. Page 14 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 18,1999 (#2466 James Ranckens, continued) Carlson commented he does not prefer the plan that Is being proposed by Renckens, and the City needs to look at a long-range plan for ponding and roadways. Winston remarked that the minutes reflect that the subdivider is responsibie for access, and in his view the access to Carlson's northern property next to Highway 12 wiil uitimateiy come out to Crystal Bay Road. Carlson stated it is doubtful that a road will be able to be constructed along the northerly portion of Van Zomeren stated the septic site is 58 feet from the stormwater management pond where the requirement is 75 feet, and 13 feet from the driveway where the requirement is 20 feet. The southwest comer of the septic site is approximately three feet from the property line. The driveway needs to be located ten feet from the Crystal Creek subdivision and ten feet from the front lot and be located in the middle of the lot. which would leave it 13 feet from the septic site. Post stated that Weckman had mentioned that the septic site could be slightly altered. Smith remarked that the septic site will need to be reviewed by City Staff. Gaffron stated the comprehensive plan and City's actions and policies are centered around corridors for future connection of roadways. Gaffron stated it has been City's Staffs view that it Is good planning to place a roadway across the northern portion of this property and that the Planning Commission could mandate that as part of the approval process. Van Zomeren commented it is presently platted as a flag lot, and Orono's subdivision ordinance says that it should be platted as an outlet. The outlet access can be platted at 30 feet since it will serve as a driveway for potentially one or two residences. Schroeder remarked that the northern 50 fool outlot extending the road should be platted even If it is not going to be built at this time, noting that the City's map shows all kinds of platted roads that are not presently constructed. Schroeder stated he would be willing to keep the access at 30 feet to accommodate the septic site and that now is the time to plat the access. Hawn commented she has a problem with granting variances to septic systems in a new development. Gaffron stated the septic inspector is authorized to grant an administrative variance if he determines it to be appropriate. Steve Koehler, a resident in Crystal Creek Subdivision, commented he is in favor of this proposal and would rather not see the back lot served by Crystal Creek Road. Koehler inquired whether the minutes could reflect the Planning Commission's desire to have the second possible back lot serviced from the 30 foot access road. Smith commented in her opinion it Is not up to this Planning Commission to determine that. Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2466,3020 Watertown Road, permitting a Class II Subdivision as outlined in City Staffs March 2,1999 memorandum, subject to a 30 foot outlot being platted to permit access to the flat lot (Lot 2), and further subject to City Staff review and approval of a satisfactory septic system and grading and Page 15 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#246$ JaiiMS Rcnckens, continued) drainage plan. This approval is based on the understanding that if the septic system is not approved, then this application will be denied. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. f (#10) #2467 BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 1025 BROWN ROAD SOUTH, CLASS III SUBDIVISION, 10:28 p.m. -11:02 p.m. Steve Bohland, Bohland Development, was present. Van Zomeren stated the Applicant Is proposing to subdivide a 45.1 acre parcel lying between Willow Drive South and Brown Road South into six parcels for a single family residential development. This parcel is currently zoned RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential, with a two acre minimum requirement. Van Zomeren commented that the wetland setback is an issue and may require a variance to grade or fill within 26 feet of the wetland. The subdivision will also require a conditional use permit for grading within five feet of the property line to create a driveway for Lot 1. Currently there are three tax parcels on this property, with a 50 by 200 foot strip of wetland along the east property line of the proposed subdivision being tax-forfeited in 1982 to the State of Minnesota. It was subsequently conveyed to the City of Orono for drainage purposes. Van Zomeren commented that City Staff does not feel this land is needed by the City and the parcel could be made available to the Applicant with the entire wetland area west of Brown Road South being included in a conservation and flowage easement agreement. Van Zomeren indicated that Lot 1 is the largest parcel with 20.8 acres total, with 5.7 acres dry buildable. Access is being proposed off of King Street, which will prevent this lot from being further subdivided. Lot 2 is a 9.3 acre parcel with 3.6 acres dry buildable; Lot 3 is 4.4 acres with 2 acres dry buildable; Lot 4 is technically considered a through lot because it has potential access from Brown Road; Lot 5 is proposed to be 2.4 acres with 2 acres dry buildable; and Lot 6 is proposed to be two acres of dry buildable land. In this proposal Lots 2.3.4.5. and 6 will all have access off of a new private road from Willow Drive South. Lots 2. 5. and 6 have frontage on Willow Drive and access will not be allowed from these lots directly to Willow Drive. Lots 1 and 4 also have possible access to Brown Road, with Lot 4 not being allowed to have a driveway curb cut on Brown Road. Access to Lot 1 shall be from King Street. Van Zomeren stated the Issues left to be resolved include the number of outlots that should be created, curb cuts, the stormwater management plan, and septic Chair Smith inquired whether this was a sketch plan or a formal application before the Planning Commission. Van Zomeren stated this is a formal application and that a sketch plan review was previously held on this development. McMillan stated she has concerns regarding access off of King Street and that it might be more appropriate to have an arrangement with the adjoining neighbor regarding access. Van Zomeren commented that the proposed preliminary plat has been sent to Wally Case. DSU landscape architect, for his review. The Park Commission had requested land for a buffer strip along Willow Drive to plant trees for screening of the houses from the road. However. Staff does not recommerKl that the City accept land for tree planting, because the subdivision ordinance does Page 16 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2467 Bohland Development, continued) provide for the City to require buffering for shade trees every 40 feet. Van Zomeren stated Staff would like to have the landscape architect offer suggestions on how this buffer could best be achieved and meet the ordinance requirements as far as buffering, setbacks, and erosion o^ntroi. Bohland commented they are proposing to construct a 12 foot wide driveway. Smith noted that a conditional use permit is required for grading within five feet of the property line and that the septic sites for Lot 5 will require an administrative variance. Van Zomeren stated that the septic site will be moved stigh'Jy which will eliminate the need for a variance. The Applicant will be required to submit a grading and drainage plan for review and approval by City Staff. The landscape architect commented thal the southern part of the site, which is an open field vrHh trees along the fence line, would be improved by the addHion of shade trees. Mr. Case also suggests that the rear yard of Lot 4 along Brown Road and both sides of Carriage Road be planted with trees every 50 feet along the right*of-way. Van Zomeren stated Lot 2. which is a flag lot, will require approximately 150 feet of driveway, and Mr. Case has recommended that a buffer along that strip of driveway be considered. Van Zomeren remarked that the issues before the Planning Commission are access off of King Street, whether Lot 2 should be served by an outlet rather than a cul-de*sac, and then incorporation of the City Engineer's comments as far as grading and drainage and utility easements are concerned. McMillan inquired what the grade o' the proposed driveway would be off of Willow. Bohland stated they are proposing .s two percent grade down at the bottom and a 5.2 percent grade to the site, with another two percent yrsdc at thtt end of the cul-de-sac. Van Zomeren stated that eight percent is prefeited, but the City would allow a ten percent grade. Bohland commented regarding the setback to the wetland, they are proposing to construct a retaining wall in that area in order to meet the 26 feet setback requirement. Bohland stated there is a 10 to 1 bench on the stormwater drainage pond. Hawn inquired whether the retaining wall near King Street will remain. Bohland stated that retaining wall will remain. Bohland commented that putting two driveways side by side for access is not desirable and a better approach might be to add on six to eight feet to the driveway and then split the road where the topography begins to drop down, which should provide safe access out to Brown Road. Hawn inquired whether the driveway would be narrowed after the split. Bohland stated the driveway would be narrowed down to approximately 12 feet wide after the split, which should allow passage for two cars. Hawn inquired how long the driveway will be after it is split until it winds up at the residence. Bohland stated he would guess approximately 300 feet. Smith stated the issues before the Planning Commission are a conditional use permit for grading Page 17 i ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 18,1999 (#2487 Bohland Development, continued) within five feet of the property line to create a driveway for Lot 1. a variance to grade within 26 feet of the wetland, and a variance to the septic sites on Lot 5. Van Zomeren remarked that what the developer is now proposing will not require a variance to the wetland setback or to the septic sites for Lot 5. Lindquist inquired whether the Planning Commission needs to determine which is the front lot and which is the back lot for Lot 2. Gaffron remarked that the line that says Outlet B. that is the front yard setback, but Staff would rather have it designated it as a side yard. Van Zomeren inquired whether the outlet is acceptable off of the cul-de-sac to serve Lot 2. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the outlot would be acceptable. There were no public comments. Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2467,1028 Brown Road South, Class III Subdivision, to allow a conditional use permit for grading within five feet of the property line, to identify a front lot/back lot on Lot 2 as shown in the diagram, subject to the recommendations outlined in the Landscape Architect*s memorandum of March 14,1999, and further subject to the right-of-way being from Brown Road south to King Street, and access for Lots 8 and 6 be prior to the cul-de-sac. VOTE: Ayes 8, Nays 0. (#11) #2468 BRUCE AND BETSY NUSBAUM, 3480 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES, 11:03 p.m. -11:37 p.m. Bruce and Betsy Nusbaum. Applicants, were present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are proposing to remove the existing residence located on the lot and construct a two-story house. The existing residence is a non-conforming structure as H is located on an undersized lot and encroaches into the required side yard setback. The house is located on a lot line. The new proposed structure would be placed to meet all required setback. Wt '^berger commented this property is located In the LR-1C district. One Family Lakeshore Residential District, which has a minimum of half an acre. This lot is comprised of approximately .22 acres. Weinberger stated at the rear of the property line there is located a two-car garage with an attached lean-to structure. The Applicants are proposing to retain that existing structure. Typically the zoning code does not allow any accessory structures to remain on a lot without a principal building, and the Applicants are requesting a variance to allow this structure to remain on the property during construction. Weinberger remarked the proposed addition would raise the total structure above the allowed coverage for the lot for a total of 20.46 percent. 1 ne zoning code presently allows a maximum of 15 percent in structural coverage. Currently existing on the property is hardcover in the amount of 2.965 square feet, or 45 percent, and this proposal will reduce hardcover to 2,247 square feet, which is a significant reduction in hardcover but the structural coverage will increase on the property. Page 18 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15.1995 (#2469 Bruce and Betsy Nusbaum, continued) Weinberger stated the curb cut on Birch Lane is presentiy 44 square feet, which wiii be reduced to meet the maximum of 20 feet aiiowed by the City. The propos^ iocation of the house is aiso beyond the 75 feet required for structure from the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. Weinberger stated due to the high water tabie on this property, a basement wiii not be supported, which does pose a hardship. Weinberger noted the Appiicants have expiored other options of adding on to the present structure but the present foundation does not support any addition. Nusbaum stated the garage suffered storm damage last year and a new roof was put on the structure. Chair Smith noted that the Appiicants are proposing to make significant reductions in the hardcover, but the Planning Commission likes to see new structure conform to the 15 percent structural coverage limit whenever possible. Nusbaum commented that this plan has been revised once already to reduce hardcover and his architect has recommended this size of structure to keep the residence within the character of the rest of the neighborhood. Mrs. Nusbaum stated they would like a house to comfortably accommodate a family of four, noting that the present structure was at one time an old cabin. Nusbaum commented they have looked at various options for this property in an effon to reduce hardcover. Chair Smith commented that the CHy is concerned about the possible impact the hardcover would have on Lake Minnetonka and that structural coverage should be closer to the limit of 15 percent. Hawn indicated she was in agreement with Smith. Hawn suggested that perhaps the garage could be incorporated somehow with the house, but as the proposal is presently before the Planning Commission, she would not be able to approve the application due to the high structural coverage. Nusbaum requested the Planning Commission take into consideration the improvements they are proposing to make to the existing hardcover. Hawn commented that the Planning Commission needs to remain consistent on the 15 percent limit, noting that many applications of this type appear before the Planning Commission. Schroeder remarked that the City needs to protect Lake Minnetonka whenever possible. Chair Smith inquired whether there were any public comments. Jim Daly, 3458 North Shore Drive, commented that in his view this proposal is not excessive and the Applicants should not be penalized for their smalt lot. Mrs. Nusbaum commented that they would like to reach some type of agreement on the structural coverage. Lindquist stated whenever new strudure is being proposed, the Planning Commission likes to have the Applicants hold to the 15 percent structural coverage limit. McMillan suggested that since some major improvements to hardcover are being proposed, that perhaps some flexibility could be given on the structural coverage. Page 19 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 16.1999 (#2469 Bruc« and Betsy Nutbaum, continued) Schroeder indicated he was in agreement with McMiiian. Hawn remariced that this might not be consistent with what the Pianning Commission has done on previous applications. Weinberger suggested that perhaps the Applicants look at constructing a two and a half story house to help reduce structural coverage. Mrs. Nusbaum indicated they would be willing to reduce the size of the garage. McMillan indicated she would be willing to consider keeping the structural coverage for the residence as proposed if the garage is reduced. Schroeder commented he would be willing to approve the 16.8 percent structural coverage given the other reductions the Applicants are making to the hardcover. Hawn expressed concern that this might be setting a dai 'gerous precedent. Schroeder moved to recommend approval of Application #2468,3460 North Shore Drive. McMillan inquired if the Applicants do reduce the size of the garage, would it need to appear before the Planning Commission again. Smith stated in her view it appears this application would be denied as presented, noting that the Planning Commission would like to see structural coverage reduced. Smith inquired whether the Applicants would like this application to be tabled at this time to allow them additional time to revise their plans or whether the Planning Commission should act on this application tonight. Mrs. Nusbaum inquired what the Planning Commission would like to see as far as structural coverage Lindquist commented the Applicants will need to hold to the 15 percent structural coverage in order for him to approve this application. Schroeder withdrew his earlier motion. Schroeder moved, Smith seconded, to table Application #2468,3480 North Shore Drive, to allow the Applicants time to submit revised plans. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#12) #2471 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #278, 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 11:38 p.m. -12:05 p.m. Neil Lawson, Assistant Superintendent, was present. George Gorbatenko, Wold Architects, was present. Van Zomeren stated the Orono Independent School District #278 is proposing to construct a n^ middle school and a new site circulation plan for the Orono High School. The middle school will serve 875 students In grades 8*8. The school building will include a gymnasium, cafeteria, iecture room and media center and will consist of approximately 115,000 square feet and be two dories in height. Page 20 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 15,1999 (#2471 lnd«p«nd«nt School District, continued) use psnmit, subjoct to tho condHIons outlined In City StafTs memorandum of March 16,1999, and further subject to review and approval by City Staff of a lighting pian, landscaping plan, parMng and traffic circulation, and height restrictions of the building. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW (#13) #2463 GEORGE STICKNEY, ON BEHALF OF JOAN THOMPSONmODNEY AND PAULA MINNICH, 250 AND 340 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD, 12:07 p.m. -12:11 p.m. George Stickney was present. Van Zomeren stated the Applicant is proposing to purchase two parcels, 250 and 430 Old Crystal Road, to combine them into a 20.2 acre site for an eight lot subdivision served by a private road terminating in a cul-de-sac. This parcel is zoned RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential, which has a two acre minimum. Van Zomeren indicated that the proposed subdivision can meet all the standard lot requirements and the developer will need to identify the exact location of the lots for review and approval by CKy Staff. The sketch plan will also need to be reviewed by the City Engineer to address issues dealing with drainage, stormwater, and access. Stickney indicated that the lots are being platted wide enough to met the lot requirements and can be altered somewhat if there is a problem. Stickney indicated they are attempting to save as many trees as possible in this development. Stickney commented that the proposed septic sites have been perked and tested by Steve Weekman. Chair Smith inquired whether there were any public comments. Rod Minnich, 340 Old Crystal Bay Road, indicated he is in favor of the proposed plan and would like to see as many trees as possible be preserved. Chair Smith commented that it appears the developer is attempting to preserve those trees and they vrill remain largely untouched. McMillan suggested this pian be presented to the Parks Commission for their review regarding the location of the bike trail. There was no action taken by the Planning Commission on this application. (#14) #2469/2470 STEVEN AND JO WEBSTER, 600 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD - VARIANCES This application was tabled at the request of the Applicants. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#15) Report of Planning Commission Representatives Attending Council Meetings on February 22,1999, and March 8,1999 Page 22 5. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH IS. 1999(Planning Commiuion Comments, continued)^ attended the February 22.1999 City Council meeting and no major (#19) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION None ind Iff. JIa NUAI^I?,'^^^^^ approval of minutes for FEBRUARY IS, 1999 AND i«2, COUNCIL MEETINGS ON MARCH 22. March 22 - Smith April 12 - Undquist ADJOURNMENT SoTirlryeTs'^Nays?^”**" •*®®"**®‘*‘ *® adjourn the meeting at 12:19 p.m. Sandra Smith, Chair Page 23