Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03-15-1999 Planning Packet
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday* March 15,1999—6:30 p.m. 2780 Kelley Parkway—Council Chambers AGENDA Council Representative: Mayor Jaubour AUDIENCE MEMBERS: Please sign in for the public record at the front podium if you wish to address the Planning Commission. Applicants will be asked to move to the front table to answer questions when the Chair announces the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for the April 12, 1999, City Council meeting unless otherwise noted by the Chair. OLD BUSINESS Review of these items will commence prior to o between scheduled public hearings. 1. #2227 2.#2451 3.#2457 #2458 Gary Tucker, 3466 Ivy Place, Variance. (Staff: Liz Van Zomeren). Lyle and Gretchen Shaw, 1750 Shadywood, Variances. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). Paula and David Lindberg, 1392 Baldur Park Road, Variances and Conditional Use Permit. (Staff: Liz Van Zomeren). Proposed Zoning Amendment: LR-lC-1 Density Credit. (Staff: Mike Gaffron). NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS #2444 #2461 7.#2462 8 #2465 Brian and Susan Schebler, 1354 Rest Point Circle, Variance. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). Chris Pierson, on behalf of Brysons/Johnsons, 650,660,670,680 Big Island, Lot Line Rearrangement. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). David Lovelace, having an Interest in 220 Big Island, Variance (Staff: Paul Weinberger). Robert Erickson, 364 and 372 Westlake Street, Lot Line Rearrangement. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). 9. #2466 #2467 11. #2468 12. #2471 James Renckens, having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road, 2 lot subdivision. (Staff: Liz Van Zomeren). Bohland Development, having an inte^'est in 1025 Brown Road South, Class III Subdivision. (Staff; Liz Van Zomeren). Bruce and Betsy Nusbaum, 3480 North Shore Drive, Variances. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). Independent School District #278, 685 Old Crystal Bay Road, Conditional Use Permit. (Staff: Liz Van Zomeren). SKETCH PLAN REVIEW 13. #2463 George Stickney, on behalf of Joan Thompson/Rodney and Paula Minnick, 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road. (Staff; Liz Van Zomeren). 14. #2469^470 Steven and Jo Webster, 500 Orono Orchard Road, Variances. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 15. Report of Planning Commission representatives attending Council meetings on February 22, 1999 and March 8, 1999. 16. Other issues for discussion. 17. Planning Commission approval of minutes for February 16,1999. 18. Selection of representatives for City Council meetings on March 22, 1999 and April 12, 1999. ADJOURNMENT • • Public A ttendance Meeting D ate JD A.- i 7 □ C ouncil 1^ Planning C ommission □ Park C ommission □ Other EPLEASE KFIIXa^Wrg; TOE S;lNro«M«ION,|; r REQUESTED BELOW IfOR OUR CTTY RECORDS, efe.g«gv,;g::- a:, PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1.(^WvrWoWir . ) _________________________________________ 2 fZ-V / ^ c. /=c*<-/^y pLc<.< • #'-■ ■ '■■■ —'■■■ t l3*i^ tV‘Uu»- ‘^'lv<U- ______- ^ d Ai I'l /'KO 4u ^V v2-- >- 2 ! 1 .i-T’-cX. ^ A Mvi' / <» v/^\i/I X V n 1ll/.W/.’/£ i/ Pi hw^L i/iAtAJlLAO-y ....... 7 r^<,^ \H 7>C L'j (<- .( C'' .^HL7 a 1 0 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ in _____________________________________________ 11.._______-______________________——------------------------------------------------------ 1-1 ________________________________________—------------------------------- 13. ________________ 14. - / TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator DATE:February 26,1999 SUBJECT:#2227 Gar>'Tucker 3466 Ivy Place Variance Amendment-Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore District (1/2 acre) 15,541 sq. ft. (.356 acres)___________________ Exhibits:A B C D E F G H I I Applicant's statement Plat map Survey Hardcover worksheets Previously approved elevations Proposed Elevations PC Minutes-4/21/97 CC Minutes-4/28/97 Resolution #3891 Permit Record Application:The applicant applied for a variance in 1997 to make improvements to the existing residence. One of the improvements involved covering a porch that encroached into the required side yard setback. The variance was approved. The applicant applied for a building permit with the required one year period, however, the roof design over the porch has changed to alleviate ice dams concerns. Because the roof design has changed from the approved variance, the Building Official has requested that the Planning Commission and City Council confirm that it meets the intent of the approved variance. Pertinent Ordinances: LR-IC District Standards, Section 10.25,6 (B) Hardcover Regulations, Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C), 6 U2?27 Gary Tucker 3466 Ivy Place 3/15/99 page-’l r ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IC District Standards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside Yard 1/2 acre 100'30'10’75’ + ALS* Subject Property Lot Area and Yards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside 15,541 sq. ft. (.356 acres) 60.35*lO.r from garage 1 1 1.8’ on north side 1 120’ The subject lot does not meet the lot area, lot width or side yard setback requirements. The proposed change in roof design would not further encroach into the required 10* side yard setback. Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0’-75’4,506 sq. ft.188 sq. ft.NONE 188 sq. ft.188 sq. ft. (4.1%) 75’-250 ’10,600 sq. ft.3,420 sq. ft. (32.36%) • 2,680 sq. ft. (25%) 3,637.8% (34.3%) 987.8 sq. ft. (9.32%) 250'-500 ’436 sq. ft.215 sq. ft. (49.31%) 130.8 sq. ft. (30%) 215 sq. ft. (49.31%) 84.2 sq. ft. (19.31%) The proposed change in roof design would not change the amount of hardcover that was requested and previously approved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION To approve the requested design change to retain the previously granted variance. B2227 Gary Tucker 3466 Ivy Place 3/13/99 page —2 j t , I , 1^, .' A r K Description of Unmual Property Conditions: Proposed Peak Over Existing House -House was built in 1900 and the existing rafters are ori^nal 2 ”x V’ ccask.. action. Ice dams are produced over the entire entry area from the less tlu n standaid ii'sulatioo. •The original variance was for a covered entry wluch would creato a valley between the new covered entry peak and the existing sturwell dormer. This valey would crea^ an even greater ice dam problem. -The proposed peak over the existing house would enable the installation ’df more insulation and create a needed vented lur space to stop ice dams from fonning. -Side set back would be the same as the original variance. Hard cover is not affected. -Neighbors views are not affected at all. p ■'V / \ y V(l8)y ^ b -U /ji . c ■%#? w A A' r*^/ 0^4'?’ >' / <:^ \ y >* 1.5 -t? ^ 03)^'- _ ( N' \ LOT 150 SPRING PAPJ-C (31) 20 ^>v;'.V^\ '15)^- • • • • • • . tt ji?*'R.\\0 it *• ' V' ' ' % ♦ ‘- ' \ /< V'4 - « V*' ' &. j«^y '■ *' ^ m , I •a'-'f ^ 1 r ^A <b vA -2, V'. •• •. % of- £rctwdf\ffit^ * ^ ^ • ‘••V• •. »r V..'1 ,V^1> .-V » *t • r* A A ’ i<ikVi? • •••.• ••••«• • .. S.F. •S.F. t S.F. 137 S.F. • .1. S.F..1 •S.F. . __________ S.F. •S.F. •&F“- S.F. iSfl .S.F. A rv-^“^ .. .. 1% . .*• *:? . CfKRX lUCKftZ • * hardcover CALCUL^0:iO#i4^ ’ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* ^ 7S»2S0^ •• •*'0 • • •«•• • OKKbNLEEj 25-500*500-1000' •i • ■ 4 EXISTING HARProVER IN ZONE A. House ________ • •••*•• • ••• e : COnC, ^x 2 •& 4- W5^U5 Garage width IVOW, V//I B. X* X X • •• 12:&2lirS:F. * — 's.f;S.F. S.F. 114- 30.1 2Z,\ l! C. Driveway * :CffUCtlSx€ AOaoriI X .X .. J>. Sidewalk $T<9C>P X X }'f •ti^D^ i X X lO I 'I'! ij> “r F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic. Or Fabric • X X X M t • • • •• ••• G. Other . •J TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN 40NE B • •••• PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House __________. X ?• Lcnfih •.* “ V.x2-2?^. .• Co*-l U>PH> «-U*IIS UL.P.'* H o>'S~• i ' ^------- B. Garage _ • « • wjach . 3.3 X X *20. i 2.*Z.I ;C. Drivewy Cor-tMk A/«o/u» • • 7 • j > •• . 30. I X X : •• » ^D. Sidewalk iSi.Tj- X X . Patid?p^ pt«Jt'S#Vwis ’10.S' X X I'l.X • •. • »^y • • ••»•• • •• • f m ■ F.” Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total property area in .zone A —:---------4- B • •• • m m ‘ * 14 . i mt .S.F. m 0/7 • S.F. • •ko .S.F. • • • • lA*}’S.F. 104 Is.f; i m •••••• • .nfi' • • • S.F. *1 ^S.F.if•t> • • • 1 • • ••« . • • •••S.In n •S.F. m •"S.F. >. »■ •« • • • . ••••■ • IV •• • • .S.F. • • • • 1 e • • • HZd-S.F.•to ^oo 's.F. •• # •• % c )-207 >• • _S.F. m " *29 ■■S.F. m /T-I S.F. • •//V •.S.F. • !SB'6fc6"“.S.F. •I»• S.F. to "s.F. • •0 0 • • m • •• • • • • • /53 S.F. m "s.F. m _S.F. • • t rm ^8«./5 S.F. •S.F. M «"*S.F. H • *"s.F. • S.F. •j^S.F. •lo r.oo S.P. • • •• • • • . • • A B • e • • A B L 7"ir-<^% *. i •: ... ?• •. (f- .■;. i • ( • > ■• ’) Vp ‘V. **'4' ■) ^ ii *'i ../, 'A/’r/'o'' J minutes of the orono planning commission meeting HEU> ON APRIL 21,1997 ‘ (#10) #2227 GARY E. TUCKER, 3466 IVY PLACE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC hearing 9:25-9:30 P.M. The AfficUrvh of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. • * • • •• • • • • •• * * • , *The Applicant was present. Van Zomeren indicated the subject property is located on Casco Point m thc^fjC zoning district. The applicant is propoang to constract a new deck on the hdcwide of tne readwee and an entry over the front door. The existing sidewalk will be modfied. An average lakeshore setback, hardcover in the 75-250* setback area, and side yard scAack variances arc required. The deck wiU be accessed by stairs that will be located in of the average lakeshore setback. Hardcover will increase 987 s.f. in the 75-250’ wtback from 32 26% to 34.3%. Van Zomeren indicated Staff recommends approval of me application. She noted the side yard as the hardship. The structure is looted in the mrage lakeshore setback and the deck will further encroach into the setback. Tucker reported that the sidewalk modification will allow the sidewalk to run to the front of the residOTCc instead of the side. He indicated the slab located next to the house cannot be eliminated as there is foundation underneath the stoop due to an old weBhouse. There were no public comments. Stoddard inquired if the neighbors have voiced any opinion. It was reported that the nei^bors approved the proposed plan. McMillan moved, Stoddard seconded, to approve Application #2227. Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#11) #2228 FRANK AND KATHLEEN ST. LAWRENCE, 253 CYGNET PLAGE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 9:30-9:33 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was present. E- ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 28,1997 (#7 - #2217 - Thimmesh - Continued) ‘ • • • ^ • The Applicant ssked for Council direction. Council recommended no rear variance so the addition would be at 28’, reduce the hardcover and a garage door would be allowed. • t Flint withdrew the motion to table. Flint moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 3888 per the Planning Commission recommendation with the exception that the rear setback is to be met allowing a 28' x 18' addition and removal of the existing shed for the properly located at 1945 Fagemess Point Road. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 2. Peterson and Kelley opposed. (#8) Review of this application follows review of Item #3. (*#9) #2225 JOHN THEOBALD, 4101HIGHWOOD ROAD - RENEWAL VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3889 Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 3889 granting approval for street setback, side setback, lot area and width, and hardcover variances for construction of a new residence located at 4101 Highwood Road. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#10) #2226 JOHN AND SUSANNE KOOB, 3065 JAMESTOWN ROAD- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 3890 I Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 3890 granting approval of a conditional use permit to permit construction of a berm on the property located at 3065 Jamestown Road. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. (#11) #2227 GARY TUCKER, 3466 IVY PLACE-VARIANCES-RESOLUTION NO. 3891 The applicant was present. Van Zomeren explained that the applicant is requesting a side yard variance along the north property line because the front stoop and entryway would encroach into the side yard, an average lakeshore setback to allow construction of a new deck, and a hardcover variance of 9.32%. Kelley asked for clarification of the hardship. Tucker responded that there is no cover for the front entry. The stairway protrudes into the existing deck and is therefore not useable with a table and chairs. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING minutes for APRIL 28,1997the ussion 18’ ’ointRoad. EUANCE- street Knew ON NO. north an average 32®/o. r for the with a (#11 - §2227 - Tucker - Continued) 0«tten ym wncemcd ^ut a 10% increase of hardcover and questioned the possibility of toaccersatoe car Ldl; “ed'totS^ &Uey Mked if there were any cominents fiom neighbors. Van Zomeren responded that she had reived no negative continents and the Neighbor’s Acknowledgement forms were included in the packet mdicatmg that they were aware of the proposed improvements. to «PP«ve ResolutionNo. 3891 granting approval for side yard »verage lakeAore setback and hardcover variances to permit construction of a fiont entry stoop and deck for the property located at 3466 Ivy Place. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CYGNET PLACE - Mr. and Mrs. St. Lawrence were present. Van Zomeren explained that the property is restricted by a 75' setback from a pond and bxiWtog site. Side yard and fiont yard setback variances are required for an addition. A hardcover variance of .95% is also needed in the 75-250' setback. Kelley moved Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3892 granting approval for side yard setback, front ymd setback and hardcover variances to allow a garage stall addition for the property located at 253 Cygnet Place. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#13) GEORGINE HACKNEY, 2184 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE The applicant was present. Van Zomeren noted foe appUcant has indicated the possibility of needing another variance. The applicant explamed there is an existing front porch which is proposed to be enlarged bv 50 s f. mcreasmg hardcover from 25.3% to 25.9%. ^ ^ Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to table Application #2230 and refer it back to Planning Commission; Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. lltfr Li«Ml 5aiT •Jihr-i «Vcft r«w«»'.ririT7ti HxcA • """ " * ' —>■' « ■ ■ . Permit X' Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement FormI (we) *pjWlI> of Iw lPLAi(!^[print name(s)] [print address]have ^ewed thejplansfor.the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 34^ /VY also referred to as Land Use Application No. f I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to conjGrm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner 2T7. d Sc ^ ^ Property Owner Date ***** I (we) [print name(s)][print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at___________________also referred to as Land Use Application No.________ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning OfiBce at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. 8 REQUIRED SUBMITTALSAll gf fgllQWing information must be submitt^H hv the application deadlini. riaf»> In order for vour appHcation to be consMergd fnmp]y|y.__ Completed Application Form---- Certified Property ^ers List of owners within 150 ’, labels and plat map (you must obtdn this list, labels and map fi-om Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). ---- Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproduction. ---- Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 814" x 11" for reproduction. — Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy SW x 11"). — List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of appUcant(s) if not current owner(s). — As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. __ Additional items as may be requested by City staff. 4. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour yunimte aPPlicatiQU is mt COmDletC if the above information not been incl.idi>d. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Adnumstrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) Md/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the mformation supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature _______________________ OWNER'S SIGNATURE Die owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purp'^ses of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date ApphcMt must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and CouncU. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the BuUding & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. __j TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator March 10,1999 SUBJECT:#2451 Lyle and Gretchen Shaw 1750 Sh^ywood Road Variances-Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1C One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 Acre) Lot Area:10,430 square feet (.30 acre) Application: Lyle and Gretchen Shaw appeared before the Planning Coimnission on January 19,1999 for variances to permit the addition of a garage and living space to the existing residence. The iq)plicants requested 1,649.7 s.f. of structure where 1,564.5 s.f. is allowed on the lot. The addition would also require a variance from the allowed hardcover in the 75>250' lakeshore setback. The Planning Commission reconunended approval on a vote of 5 to 0 of the variance to permit additional hardcover based on the following conditions: 1. The applicants reduce structural coverage on the lot to 15% (1,564.5 s.f.). 2.Prior to issuing a building permit, the applicants must provide a drainage plan that is acceptable to City Staff to show the proposed development will not pose a risk to the property owners or adjacent property owners. The applicants have revised the plan to conform to allowed structural coverage, however the new plan would require an additional variance to raise the roof of the house within the 0-75' lakeshore setback, and within the Average Lakeshore Setback. The original plan reviewed by the Planning Commission did not propose any changes to the building envelope within the 75' lakeshore setback. The existing structure is a 1 1/2 story house with living space in the upper 1/2 story. By reducing the building size to accoirunodate the 15% structural coverage requirement the Shaw's have requested the 1/2 story be increased to a full story. The roof would be raised 6' above the existing roof line. This alteration would allow the e* .tire space to be used, thus increasing the livable space of the home. §2^5! Lylt and Gretchen Shaw nSOShaJywoodRoad Vartaneet 3/IS/99 faft I This application requires the following variances: 1.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (LX2): To allow 2,358.64 s.f. (50.42%) of hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback, where 719.45 s.f. (15.3%) exists and 1,169.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed, and to allow a revised building plan within Ae 0-75' lakeshore setback. 2.Section 10.56, Subd. 16(CX6): Average Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. Pertinent Ordinances: • Section 10.56, Subd. 16(CX6): Average Lakeshore Setback • Section 10.22, Subd. 2: Allowed Hardcover • Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(1): Allowed Hardcover ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IC (1/2 acre) Lot Area t Lot Width Lakeside Yard Side Yard Street Yard Required 21,780 s.f 100’75’10’30’ Proposed 10,430 s.f.61.55’75’11 ’57’ §7451 Lyk and Crttchin Shaw 1750 Shadywosxl Road VartanctM J/i5/99 Ragil Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0-75'5,752 s.f.517.25 s.f. (8.9%) none (0%) 517.25 s.f. (8.9%) To permit a change to the building envelope. 75-250'4,678 s.f.719.45 s.f. (15.3%) 1,169.5 s.f. (25%) 2,358.64 s.f. (50.42%) To permit an addition of hardcover 250-500'0 0 0 (30%) C • none 500-1000'0 0 0 (35%) 0 none 0-75' Lakeshore Setback The existing residence is located 55' from the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. The attached deck is 48' from the lakeshore. The total hardcover closer than 75' from the lake would not be increased by the proposed plan. 75-250' Lakeshore Setback The existing hardcover would increase by 1,639.19 s.f. The property could add 450 s.f. of hardcover in the setback without requiring any variances. The propos^ would raise the hardcover to 50.42% where 25% is allowed. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 10,430 s.f.Existing: 888.7 s.f. Proposed: 1,444.02 s.f 8.5% 13.8% The deck located on the lakeside of the house is not surrounded by a fence, nor does it exceed 6' above grade, therefore it is not considered structure. §2451 Lyli and Cretchen Shaw 1750 Shadywood Road yarlancts 3/15/99 Page 3 ANALYSIS Variance STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant has included his statement of hardship as Exhibit B. The applicant should also be asked for his testimony regarding this issue. Issues 1. 2. 3. 4. The existing lot does not contain a garage. The proposal would provide the applicants a 33* by 23* attached two-car garage. The proposal would meet all yard requirements. Hardcover would increase to 50.42% in the 75-250' lakeshore setback. Not included in the setback is 517.25 s.f. of hardcover that would remain in the 0-75' lakeshore setback. Existing on the property is 15.3% hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback. A 5' by 5' storage shed that exists on the street property line would be removed should the development be approved. RECOMMENDATION • The Planning Commission's direction to the applicant was to reduce structural coverage to the permitted 15%. • The Planning Commission has the following alternatives to consider. A. To recommend approval of the application as submitted based the applicant's Statement of Hardship. B. To recommend denial of the application based cn hardcover of50.42% where only 15.3% exists and 25% is allowed. C. To amend the application. i §2451 Lyk and Cntchtn Shaw 2750 Shadywood Road Variances 3/15/99 Page 4 Should the Planning Commission recommend alternative A, to approve the application, staff recommends the applicant provide a drainage plan that would be acceptable by City Staff to show the proposed development would not pose a risk to the subject property or adjacent properties. This being completed prior to the issuance of a building permit. Attachments 3' te Application Description of Request and Statement of Hardship Revised Site Plan/Survey Original Site Plan -- January 1999 Lakeside Elevation — January 1999 Lakeside Elevation -- March 1999 North Elevation — March 1999 South Elevation •• March 1999 Main Floor Plan Second Floor Plan Hardcover Worksheets Plat Map Location Map Site Topography Property Owners List Permit Record Plarming Commission Minutes ~ January 19,1999 t243l LyU and Grttchtn Shaw l7S0ShadyyfoodRoad VarUuKts 3/15/99 PagtS A Application #. SX • Date EeceiTed • •: • • o •• •- * • ? . ••• • • • • * t .b • */•JAmount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION .. .Initial Application Fee $250.00 " ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150^00__ (no change from original application) ' . Variance for non-cox^oraung structures' $250.00 Aft^-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) *v ••• ^: h; • • • PROPERTY FORMATION Site Address )RMATION ^ igYioocC ifojtO ProperQr Identification Number (PJD.l • n^/t*? -z.’b -Zt -cco'*! m. m A A A m. ^ ^ _ • Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey . . . . • -Date?] ' I (do) Acquired __ i^o own the adjacent parceb of land. Present use of property: xv residential o ther (specify) Zoning District: ________________________________ T*- fmonfiiAvear^ APPLICANT Name A____________________ Address: ‘^7/7 Name Phonefwric l ’ rvg .V/^ Phone fliom el ^/z.90f: 3vs> Phone (wod City: ______Zip: ^p£33r|I OlrVNER (if different than i^licant) ^ Name A.vL,t. ^hAcO Address: />5~0 Phone (horne d . V>/«3 __ Phone (wbrk)___^£i_/£2Vj_fV£d City; OAt*jQ __________Zip: ^STi I fr'^\ \ r.J DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Constniefion Cost $ Describe request in detail: Srz. ________________________ (attach additional sheets .if necessaiy) t • VARIANCES REQUTOD ___Lot Area ____Lot Width , ' X X Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore * • o Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTiON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS• . * • # Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code reouirements : <Sfr. Amfejnn .•______]_______‘ (attach additional sheets if necessary) ROELOFS B REMODELING & RENOVATION December 16,1998 REQUEST FOR VARIANCE 1750 SHADYWOOD ROAD SITE CONDITION: The subject property is a small lot 0©ss than ’A acre) on the West shore of Crystal Bay. The site is generally flat though located on a modest ridge. The main yard rises approximately 6 feet above the street, continues flat and then falls uniformly to the lake (28% slope). The site is not heavily wooded but mature trees and some bushes exist. The existing house is small (746 SF)* It contains a small Bedroom, Kitchen, Living Room and a Bath. Winding stairways approximately 30” wide provide access to a finished expansion space beneath the roof (100 SF over T tall) and to the full basement found under approximately 2^ of the building. The house built sometime in the 20’s or 30’s is in generally good condition. No Garage is located on the property. A 5 x 5 storage shed encroaches on the county right of way. REQUEST: The request for variance comes in two parts. The first is acceptance of the existing conditions. The existing house lies too close to the shoreline and too close to the North property line. The house was built long before the setbacks were established. The second part of the request is for a variance for hardcover to construct an addition to provide a two-car attached Garage and an asphalt driveway with turnaround. Construction is contemplated on top of the Garage to expand the house at some point in the future but when is a function of budget, timing and such. Plwis submitted present a comprehensive design solution and wish list.” The Garage building is a basement garage type requiring some cutting of soil to provide access and some likely retaining of dirt. Specifics arc as yet unclear. T^ Garage, though rower in elevation, is designed to borrow approximately 4’ from the existing basement to perform at a nominal width of 22’ (24’ less two 12” block walls) while maintaining the required sideyard setback to the South. The depth of the Garage, nominally 36 ’ Is designed to provide adequate but not generous storage at the front of the Garage for lawnmowers, snow blowers and the like and to provide space for a legal and acceptable stairway between the main floor and the lower level and Garage. The proposed driveway would be minimal in width, slightly wider than the garage toperrog quickly to one car width. The turnaround would allow for nose first entiy to Co. Rd. 19. The variance required would be for hardcover totaling 51.1% in the 75 zone. No greater encroachment toward the water is needed. No expansion of the portion of the existing house tha is within the 0 to 75’ zone is requested or contemplated. 11900 WA'fZAT.\BOllEN:\RD * SlTrt212 • .MIN.NErO.NK.\.>LN* 55305 Fax 612-5!2'0469 ’ Phone: 612-512-0110 T ^ /'* • ]) *a>JLn *i4' ROELOFS REMODELING & RENOVATION Variance Request -1750 Shadywood Road Page Two The hardship is that of many of the properties in and around Lake Minnetonka. The lot is small and the restrictions and zoning adopted long after the house was built make it very difficult to bring the house to any contemporary standards that align with the market values. A two-car attached Garage with an asphalt driveway is a fairly basic expectation. We hope that after thoughtful consideration you agree. Sincerely, o.r c-Vv \ ^ ^ Revise ci?\o.v^ 1^00^ prepeve^ Vo W (p* •W\5 \ococVicw. 0S9* r-- 01 LU LiJa: GL lx.o 2 O h-o, q:o O) UJ Q <ou: C 3 P^viii;sv.v»AViViV^^^^ 3* o.>n u c»-r >/ rgiiw'^iiiiiMiJiMAMJ^ \m99Kd\ IT 4W4 ■■■■imWi iri BB ■■■■■■ li>^ ■■‘JJ ^ stcoNO Ltva noon »» ••• • ' illriUiiiiiaiii ilUiiiiiiiaiB f OMOI Ek»s+''^ j S'^vucWv^er rn #2 '•'■•' ■ -•• i* rrf •$ ••• ^ T*j ^0 L lV^ftrcV> mi 1 m.UJJ.IXLLU .TSi. -:3sr?L.t-=T m1■ r ~ I I.n 1111.1 ^ Jc -V *:c^-r-V *5lOi^lO Xloljrl* ^ULO*mt>yl o 1o I 1.0 fttQ otrrv^^u 2x)AT)&0 , I ^fPlurt^ SvrbPctm LMNOAMEA iJtiMl MAMFLOORPLAN I•T ^UlSlil tlfilO ^UAVl H HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET K SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)75-250'250-500'500-1000' EXISTING HARDCQVF.P IN yoNT -. ->.. A. House •! " ••• •• \ '• -jt f Length . X . X. X Width Zc.^ S.F. . ^99/>S • y S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Garage C. Driveway S.F. • • • • X X S.F. S.F. D. Sidewalk X X ••S.F. S.F. • • E. Patio/Deck x- X X • • 20. O S.F. S.F. F. Lindscaite Uoderlida By Plasdc X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. O. Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPER nr AREA IN ZONE 57>.z$" -I- B' s~>yz.X 100 S/'?.VT S.F. y^s-z. X S.F. JZ9 % PROPOSED HATtnrOVER TN ZONE A. House S.F. Lcitgih X X X Width ^99 > S.F. __________S.F. ____ S.F. B. Oarage C. Driveway S.F. . • X X as: m S.F. S.F. D. Sidewalk .' X X S.F. S.F. E. Patio/Deck X X ^>.5“ o F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE * B S‘>SZ. S.F. xlOO - y>s-z ^ S.F. •/L9 % A B A • V •» c S.F. • S.F. .V * I.* • •H A B HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONEt (CIRCLE ONE) 0*75 ■.1^.11 1 iC(f£ A. Houm 2S0400* 900>1000* - ___________1.SJ. Width za • • . • •«• •• • •• • .* •• • B. .Ganige • • C. Driveway • X. .X ** • • •• • ^“"7Tr • • % sA S.F. .*. . i* . .* I-SaF.- • _SJ. X X • ••. • • • • •• • • .FzV.o D. Sidewalk w • • S.F. SJF. Z'*• • • •Zf' “ ••• « • S.F. 8J>. • • E. Fado/Deek X X •SJ>. S.F. F. T andiftape UsdeiUla By FUsde % •• •X X X S.F. 8J». 8JP. O.Si’. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE .TOTAL FROPERfY AREA IN ZONE + R y/P/xlOO • . V9.yr S.F. vr • S.P. 3 ___% raOFQSED HARDCOVgR W ZONE a! House (/y.dV/Ky>^ Lutlth • 33.0 ■ S.F. WUA • % V • •/j.s- X X X • a • • . ¥• • '^2 > O 8 J. .s’y.© S.F. B. Oarhge C. Driveway • # . /z. S.F. Si>. • • X X • • • • • * • D. Sidewalk X . * 9d. $ 3 s J». Sif. E. Fetio/Deck X X Si’. Si’. • • F. Landscape UoderiJn By Flasde X X X Si’. S.F. S.F. • m O. Other Si’. • • • • • ••A TOTAL HARDCOVER Rf ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •* l3S/r£¥ B yY>/’ _ X100 23Sf.2¥ S.P. ¥2 »r S.F. • 5V3. VZ A B t • L /zzAKV. i Si’. O- S.F. A B I 400 . r •• Jp’ ^ *i- ,«-i-^.f.vV- WIST WAMCM >0 -•■ i-.* -.Cbune ft ^ ^ A m 8C0 |ts| • JS f.y Sfi'; CHRBTINE or ^ / linn ST|2^-*, BATS ■ATS OE n ,.x*. > • V. . - m y<s^Forest,, dahlbd .^v «0 W W« • ••/•* 'fi , k'vv.:-'.*-. I --- o • ••«>•' Y®“ iQnMn/& /K\ s /S-3?^i' — / -^c Ol /• • • • • ft^ft • # •■ • # • . _ ^ ________________ ’ • • V i vvi.--•»:s*r-f.. •• . • v,^* .><•.. I \; A....:.; •;: V.'-!l' • RUN DATE 12/25/90 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY 2NFORHATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OMNERS LIST REPORT NO. PXA3S401 PACE 1 I •o SATCH 5tl OWNER NAME TAXPAYER . NANE/AOOR SO 17>117>23 21 OIOS •tfSO ADDRESS UNASSZ6NED AID FZNRELSTEZN • ARTHUR A DOROTHY FZNKELSTEXN 99SS 19ATH AVE N MAPLE DROVE HN 553*9 SO 17-117-23 21 0907 PROP ADDR ttlSO ADDRESS UNASSZ6NEO DIMER NAME HENNEPIN FORFEITEO LAND TAXPAYER CITY OF ORONO NAHE/AOOR P 0 DOX AO CRYSTAL RAY HN 55323 PROP ADDR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 30 17-117-2S 21 01759 SHAOVIIOQ ORETCHEN S SHAM ORETCHEN S SHAM- 1759 SNAOYMOOO RO MAYZATA HN 55391 0921 RO BO 17-U7-2S 21 9920 PROP ADDR , 91709 SNADYMOOO RO OMNER'NAHB DARYL R CARLSON TAXPAYER DARYL R CARLSON ■ NAHE/AOOR 1709 SHAOYNOOO RD MAYZATA HN 55391 SO 17-117-23 21 9903 90930 ADDRESS UNASSI6NEO ADO FZNKCLSTEIN . ARTHUR 0 DOROTHY FINKELSTEZN 99SS 19ATH AVE N HAPLE OROVE HN 55369 30 17-117-23 a 9996 99930 ADDRESS UNASSZ HENNEPIN FORFEITEO LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 DOX 66 CRYSTAL DAY HN 55Sa r V' ^' 30 17-117-a a 9019 91729 SNAOYMOOO RO H E PEHOERTON ET AL TRUSTEE MALTER H/NAaLYN E PEHOERTON 1729 SHAOYMOOO RO NAY»TA HN 55391 SO • 17-117-a a 9029 91709 SHAOYNOOO RO T 0 0 H L SNANSON THOMAS D A NAaLYN L SMANSON 1709 SHAOYMOOO RO MAYZATA HN 55391 30 17-117-a a 9oa 91769 SHAOYMOOO RO OAIL S DRINER OaL S DRINER 1769 SHAOYNOOO RO MAYZATA HN 55391 SO 17-117-a a 9oa 91779 SHAOYMOOO RO D J A T J PCTERSON DRADLEY A TRAa PETERSON 1779 SHAOYMOOO RO MAYZATA HN 55391 TOTAL SATCH 591 99919 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED Aa AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTAnON OF INFOHHAnON AS XT APPEAa THIS DATE ON THE aCOROS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE DEST OF NY KNOMLEOOE AND BELia. DATE 'ikhp A t. u •; s PERMIT RECORD Permit Ko.Date Type of Permit ORONd PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 (#8) #2448 KEITH WATERS ASSOC JDOUO CARLSON/C. RAY, 780 NORTH ARM DRIVE, VARIANCES, 9:48 p.m. -10:00 p.m. Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She stated that the applicants are proposing to^fdmodel an existing residence. The proposed changes require two variances. One variance is for^erage lakeshore setback because the e)dsting house Is located almost entirely In the fron^tback. The average lakeshore setback for the residence has slightly changed recently due tomew construction on the adjacent southern lot. Another variance is required for top of bluff setback bemuse the residence is partially located within the required 30‘ top of bluff setback. 8]>dmated there are no negative Impacts with this proposal and staff recommends approval. Catherine Ray and Blake Bichanlch were present. Ray stated that the neighbors support the application. There were no public comments. Schroeder asked how the hardcover would be redi Bichanlch responded that most of it Is relatej landscaping, such as pavers and railroad (o the existing driveway and the rest is mostly McMillan asked if the old garage wquia be retained. Bichanlch stated that the old gar^e will be used as a workshop and not for vehicles. The old driveway Is very steep and wmbe landscaped for gardens. Ray stated that one of^ reasons for the addition of the new garage is that access to the existing garage Is very diffigmfor a vehicle and they will not use the old garage for parking vehicles. Stoddard state^e can approve the proposal. McMillaa,#rated the addition fits In very well with the contour of the house. Median moved, Stoddard seconded, a motion to approve Application #2448 for Doug (rtson and Catherine Ray, 780 North Arm Drive for Top of Bluff and Average Lakeshore tetback Variances. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#9) #2451 LYLE AND ORETCHEN SHAW, 1760 8HADYWOOD ROAD, VARIANCES, 10:00 p.m. - 10:15 p.m. Weinberger presented the staff report. He stated that the applicants have proposed to co.nsL'uct a 786-square-foot addition which would include a two-stall garage and two levels of living space above it attached to the existing residence. The existing residence is 20' x 36’. There is no existing garage. This application requires variances to allow 51.1% haidcover where 25% is allowed in the 75’-250’ lakeshore setback, and to allow 15.8% total structural coverage where 15% is allowed. He said that all setback requirements are being met. Staff recommends denial of the application based on hardcover of 51.1 % where only 15.3% exists and 25% is allowed, and structural coverage being greater than 15%. He stated that should the Planning Commission approve the application, staff recommends the applicant provide a drainage plan prior to the issuance of a building permit that would be acceptable to City Staff to show the proposed development would not pose a risk to the subject property or adjacent properties. Lyle and Gretchen Shaw, the applicants, were present. Gerald Roelofs, their builder, was also present. Page 14 ;: I. i ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19.1999 (1t$) n24S1 LYLE AND GRETCHEN SHAW, 1750 SHADYWOOD ROAD - Continued Roelofs slated that the application was written as though it was for a garage. He explained the current floor plan of the house. Stoddard asked if the desire for extra living space or the desire for garage space steered the appilcaUon. Roetofs said they go hand in hand. The applicants want to bring a garage to the lot and expand the house. They want to keep the house as contiguous as possible. He said the addition is entirely behind the setback line. Roelofs reviewed the sizes of the neighboring houses. He said they would like some direction from the Planning Commission members before making further plans. Stoddard said he would like to see the hardcover scaled back. He asked what the hardcover would be if the structural coverage was brought down to 15%. McMillan said the applicants are allowed a minimum of 1.500 feet of structural coverage and that would automatically trigger additional hardcover. She said that 15% structure coverage would be 1,565 square feet and the applicants are proposing 1,650 square feet. She said she could approve the application if the structural coverage was reduced to 1,565 square feet. Roelofs said that would mean a reduction in building mass of 85 square feet. He said they did consider making the garage shorter, but It doesn't r^uce hardcover because the driveway would be longer. McMillan said she believes that structural coverage Is more important than hardcover and 1,565 square feet would be very dose to the allowed 1,500 square feet of structural coverage. Lindquist and Smith agreed with McMillan. There were no public comments. Lindquist asked If Roelofs was comfortable with redudng the strudural coverage to 15%. Roelofs said he believes they can work it out. McMillan moved, Smith seconded, a motion to approve Application #2451, Lyle and Gretchen Shaw, 1750 Shadywood Road, for a hardcover variance in the 76 ’-260 ’ lakeshore setback with the condition that prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant provide a drainage plan that would be acceptable to City Staff. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 15 3 TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator DATE:February 9,1999 SUBJECT:#2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road Variances —Continuation of Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area:31,760 sq. ft. (.729 acres) Exhibits: A B C D E Waiver Form Elevations Notice to applicant Revised survey Hardcover worksheets Previous Staff Report from February: A Application Plat map Property Owner's list Existing survey Proposed survey Hardcover worksheets Elevations F2&3 Floor Plan G PC Minutes from 5/18/98 PC Minutes from 6/15/98 PC Minutes from 7/20/98 CC Minutes from 7/27/98 CC Minutes from 8/10/98 Resolution #4143 B B2 C D E F H 1 J K L if2457 David and Paula Lindbetg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-3/15/99 page-l Application: This application was reviewed at the February 1999 Planning Conunission meeting. The Planning Commission suggested that the applicants redesign their proposal to limit structural coverage to 15% and reduce hardcover. The applicants are proposing to remove the existing residence to construct a new residence. The property is on a peninsula and has two lakeshore setback areas. A variance to a driveway in the south 75' will be required for access to the zoning lot. A variance to build a new ;uitise in the 75'- 250' setback is request^ to allow 4,910 sq. ft. (32.33%) hardcover where 3,797.5 sq. ft. is allowed. The plan presented in February requested 5,080 sq. ft. (33.44%) hardcover in the 75'-250' setback. The new plan reduces hardcover from 33.44% to 32.33%, or a reduction of 170 sq. ft. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.22, Subd. 1 and 2. Section 10.55, Subd. 8 Section 10.56, Subd. 16(J) and 16(L) Section 10.03, Subd. 19 Section 10.25, Subd. 6 H.“*457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road pc-^s/ism page-2 ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IC District Standards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside Yard 1/2 acre 100'30’ • 10'75’ and ALS* * Average Lakeshore Setback Subject Property Lot Area and Yards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside 31,760 sq. ft. (.72 acres) 97 S at shoreline; 113' at 75' setback 75' proposed to garage # ir to garage; 15' required for garage over 750 sq. ft. >75'; porch may encroach in the ALS The lot meets the lot area requirements and the lot width requirement because it meets the 80% lot width requirement. The proposed plan meets the lakeshore, side, street, and average lakeshore requirements. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Allowed (15%) Proposed Structural Coverage Proposed Percentage 31,760 sq. ft.4,764 sq. ft.House=2,446 Porch=l;407 Overhangs® 187 Total =4,040 sq. ft. 12.17% The revised plan reduces the structural lot coverage from 15.12% to 12.17% by replacing the detached garage with a 3 car attached garage. U2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-3/15/99 page-3 Hardcover Distance from Shoreline 0'-75 ’ (NORTH) 75'-250 ‘ 0'-75 ’ (SOUTH)' Total Area in Setback 7,830 sq. ft. 15,190 sq. ft. 8,740 sq. ft. 31,760 sq. ft. Existing Hardcover 686 sq. ft. (8.76%) 4,420 sq. ft. (29.10%) 3,346 sq. ft. (38.28%) 8,452 sq. ft. (26.6% of total lot area) Allowed Hardcover NONE 3,797.5 (25%) NONE 3,797.5 sq. ft. (?5%) Proposed Hardcover NONE 4,910 sq. ft. (32.32%) 900 sq. ft. (10.30%) Driveway 5,810 sq. ft. (18% of total lot area) Variance Requested NONE 1,112.5 sq. ft. (7.32%) 900 sq. ft. (10.30%). 2,012.5 (6.33%) The applicants are proposing to remove hardcover in the northerly 0'-75' section of the lot where no hardcover is allowed. The plan would remove the existing hardcover in the 75'-250' setback and replace it with new construction which would require a variance to allow 32.32% where 25% is allowed. The plan proposes 2,012.5 sq. ft. more hardcover than the maximum allowed by the ordinance. This lot, however, has two 0'-75* setbacks and a minimum amount of hardcover is needed in the southerly section to provide a driveway The proposed driveway requires 900 sq. ft. of area in the 0'-75' setback.. The previous resolution #4143 for Gary O'Keefe granted a variance to allow a 2,440 sq. ft. house with an attached garage (680 sq. ft.) with stoops, walks and patios (360 sq. ft.). The driveway was proposed at 2,245 sq. ft. The previous plan was for a rambler with a two car attached garage. • Resolution #4143 Revised Plan 3/99 House 2,440 sq. ft.4,040 sq. ft. Garage 680 sq. ft. Stoops, walks, patios 360 sq. ft.60 sq. ft. Driveway 2,245 sq.ft.1,710 sq. ft. Total 5,725 sq. ft.5,810 sq.ft. U2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-3/15/99 page—4 Each variance application must be reviewed separately as a unique ^plication. The applicant needs to demonstrate that there is a fundamental reason why the City should depart from the Code requirements for hardcover. The need for a hardcover variance in the 75-250' setback is a design issue and is not due to any uniqueness of the lot. Hardcover could be reduced through redesign to 25%. STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant has indicated that the hardship is having two 0'-75' setbacks. Having lake views on each side, however, is an amenity. It also does not impact the size of the residence because there is 15,190 sq. ft. of lot area in the 75'-250' area to build a house and a garage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION A hardcover variance is appropriate for a reasonable driveway in the 0'-75' setback on the south. There is no hardship for the amount of proposed hardcover in the 75'-250' setback. A house, garage, with a driveway tliat does not exceed 3,797.5 sq. ft. could be constructed on this site. Economic consideration and design preferences are not considered hardship under state law. U2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-3/15/99 page-5 February 17,1999 David and Paula Lindberg 3440 North Shore Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 A WAIVER FORM #2457 1392 Baldur Park Road I am requesting continuation of the review of my application for conditional use permit and variance. I release and waive any of the City’s obligations to proceed and conclude review of my application in a timely manner which includes any statuatoiy obligation for timely review. DAte * \ I i 9I } § 3 Tl j mi;;,-Z •7 *-1 9i &‘h. —f—',[i a.' 1 ^ r ' ' i; i: ■ Ml M i . i i ■' I l K 5. I h(^I(•> * • ^ i 1 ‘ ll£ <1 CUSTOM WHO /? Tli SfH § sji'wUa w^yr ■Mwir loMur •Mvr • I ^' \1 ^ 1 ? o $ !:• o 31mo 4 Acet* PAH. MPM •r. Ml DAMP «PAA^Landvest Homes, Inc. (L CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN SS323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #2457 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE; Februar>’ 17, 1999 TO: David and Paula Lindberg 3440 North Shore Drive Orono, MN 55391 COPIES TO; TYPE OF APPLICATION;Variance/Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING; 2/16/99 VOTE; 4 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Tabled for reasons noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS; 1. Need to reduce hardcover in 75-250' setback. 2. Need to meet 15% structural lot coverage requirement. 3. Grading plan for conditional use permit. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the March IS 1999 meeting is February 26,1999. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. X:\APPS'WPWIN60\WPDOCS'OAROLE'PCACnONU457 . 0. ^ K HARDCOVE SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) EXISTING HARDCOVFR IN ZONF. A. House _____________ X ^ •* '- • V / 4LCULATION WORKSHEET -9 9 75-250 ’ 250-500* SOO-lOOO*/^^^ 3-2- _______ - SF Length X X X B. - Garage C. Driveway % D. SidewaUc X X X X E. PatioTDeck X X F. Landscape Underlaui By Plastic ^Or Fabric X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONF A-House- Length X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D, Sidewalk V. .X X E. Paiio/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X . 0.*^ Other X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONTZ TOTAL PROPERTY MIEA fN ZONE A O ^ B Width B X X 100 Width a a 7<PJ o X100r.7^30 I MAR 0 3 1999 Cl IY Ori OrtONO S.F. S.F. S.F. SF S.F. SF. S.F. SF. S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF S.F. SF. SF. SF. S.F. A B SF. A S.F. ,B % \ B. Garage C. Driveway X X X X D. Sidewalk X X • • E. Wtio/Deck X X Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X .0, Other . A' ■ total HARDCOVER IN ZONE total property area in zone A__________ + B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN TONT. A. House giA4gg LcngUi X X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X X D. Sidewalk • • • • • E. X X tn/6M AUC^ X X F. Landscape ' Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total property area tN ZONE A 93/0 L' ''VO / cs C3 X 100 Width ^ B \ 100 S.F. SF. S.F. .-S.F.-~flEef rtlfitw' \ eVTY S.F. S.F. «SF. SB SF. S.F. S.F. SF. S % S 2yv/r S.F. S S.F. ZS S.F. ■ =S.F. «s S.F. a fs /o S.F. »S.F. s 60 S.F. ■S.F. s /90 7 SF n / S7 S.F. SB SF m SF. B SF. SF. y9/o S.F fsr. /^o 12.32 S.F. • % ■ HARDCOVEgXALCULATION WORKSHEET ’ ’ (CIRCLE ONE) CD-7SL ^ 75-250* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE jO^fTH A. House V 250-500* Lcn|ih X X X B. Garage _ .. C. Driveway.X X D. Sidewalk %..s X X E. Palio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA .IN ZONE A ’ ’ ' -i- B PROPO!|ED HARDCOVER IN ZOhTE ' A. House Length B. Garage X X X C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck m•• mm* •• • F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other —:w. 5? TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 9 Oa - B Width S3 S3 X 100 Width xlOO - I 1-/6 'If 500-1000’ /-ft/, 3-Z S.F. S.F. SF. SF. RECSfVED ■MAR4|j 1999 ot I I Ur O.-^ONO ______SF S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. SF. SF. S.F. S.F S.F. % SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 906 S.F. ^ S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F SF. SF. S.F. SF. jpyyo SF /O.JO Vo A B A B i 1 i tVuvi IAS Mai •• • % TO:f!hair Smith nnrf Otoiio Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Li^^^yan Zomeren^pi^ Pljpner/Zoning Administrator February 9,1999 SUBJECT:#2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road Variances and Conditional Use Permit-Public Hearing Zoning District: LR>1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area:31,760 sq.ft. (.729 acres) Exhibits: •* .* A B B2 C D E F Application Plat map Property Owner's list Existing survey Proposed survey Hardcover worksheets Elevations F2&3 Floor Plan G PC Minutes from 5/18/98 PC Minutes from 6/15/98 PC Minutes from 7/20/98 CC Minutes from 7/27/98 CC Minutes from 8/10/98 Resolution #4143 H I J K L K Application: The applicants are requesting hardcover variances in the south 0'-75' setback and the 75’-250' setbacks and a conditional use permit to grade for a driveway in the 0'-75' setback and within 5' of the west property line. The proposed plan also requires a side yard variance for the garage to be located 11’ from the property line where 15' is required for a garage that exceeds 750 sq. ft. A variance would also be required to locate the garage closer than 10' to the princip^ #24 S7 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-2/16/99 page-1 ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IC District Standards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside Yard 1/2 acre 100'30*10’75' and ALS* * Average Lakeshore Setback Subject Property Lot A««a and Yards Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside 31,760 sq.ft. (.72 acres) 97.5' at shoreline; 113* at 75' setback 75' proposed to garage ir to garage; 15'required for garage over 750 sq. ft. >75'; porch may encroach in the ALS The lot meets the lot area requirements and the lot width requirement because it meets the 80% lot width requirement. The proposed plan does not meet the side yard requirement for the garage nor the 10' separation of structures. It appears a portion of the porch may encroach into the average lakeshore setback. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Allowed (15%) Proposed Structural Coverage Proposed Percentage 31,760 sq. ft.4,764 sq. ft.House=2,126 Porch® 1,820 Garage~858 Total =4,804 cq. ft. 15.12% The proposed plan exceeds the allowed structural coverage by 40 sq. ft. A variance is required for this plan. it2457 David and Paula Llndberg 1392 Balditr Park Road PC--2/J6/99 pag*-3 • • Resolution #4143 Application House •v-v* 2,440 sq. ft. .. ir 3,946 sq. ^.(includes 1,820 sq.ft, for porch) Garage 680 sq.ft.858 sq. ft. Stoops, walks, patios 360 sq. ft.156 sq. ft. Driveway 2,245 sq.ft.760 sq. tt.(not enough parking area in front of garage) Total 5,725 sq. ft.5,720 sq. ft. The application proposes less hardcover than the amount of hardcover that was approved in the previous resolution. This application, however, requires more variances for side yard setback for the garage, setback between the accessory and principal structures and a structural lot coverage variance. Staff also does not believe that the driveway was drawn to adequately reflect what is typically needed for a parking area in front of a 3 car garage. Where the previous application required a hardcover variance to allow a longer driveway to match the topography and to allow an attached garage, this application minimizes the non-structural hardcover for a driveway by proposing a detached garage with a narrow parking pad. More hardcover is put into structures*-for the larger garage and the porch. The need for a hardcover variance in the 75'-250' setback is a design issue and is not due to any uniqueness of the lot. Hardcover and structural coverage could be reduced through redesign. The Planning Commission should also consider the location and size of the detached garage as the garage doors will face the lake and the adjacent property to the west currently may enjoy a view of the lake through this area. The average lakeshore setback does not apply to the street side of this lot even though it is located on the lake. STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant has indicated that the hardship is having two 0'-75’ setbacks. Having lake views on each side, however, is an amenity. U2457 David and Paula Lindberg 1392 Baldur Park Road PC-2/16/99 page-5 crry of orono -yA»iANCE appucation Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from ori^al application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees Rouble application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATIO Application # S'! Date Receiv^~ Amount Paid lOPERTY INFORMATION , She Addr»^s * TJ A.* %.T fT\ T \ — IProperty Identification Number fP.I.D.1 CA. \\*I 1 ?___________________ Attach legal description to appUcation if not included on required survey. Date ProBflJv Acquired^_______________________________________(raonthtyear) I (do) <^o aot^also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property; _X_readential Zoning IXstrict: ' ^ other (specify) \vA-t. 7‘h.a(y&^ PPUCANT ^ • Phonefhome ) (ol2-TSaC> (juShHUl Name _ Phonefworic ) . .. Address: iuiio JL)V ^Citv: <0y«>iAe> Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (homel^Cf ^3 VC Name (^exrsj ftVc^c. Phone (work) Wl) Address:___________________________ City:.________________Zip;------------Address: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: ^ V li.AA> 5^*^ A mw Xeo*/ JfttAwv > w^v<.drtVt-V^^ 4o / (attach additional sheets if necessary) VAIUANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area OvJt "(y Setback: ___Lot Width Front Side X Hardcover v 0-75’ Lot Coverage Rear Average Lakcshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficu^ or unusual property conditions preventing . compliance vrith Zoning Code requirem^ts:"7^^^ f^ctltr on fhjA 5>v4ro^ii^ reSctfli^ M ^ O-Tf* 'ZcMef lu>^r/iu*r ^------------------------------ (attach additional sheets if necessary) OT-II1 -A3 RUN DATE 01/12/99 BATCH 502 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XHPORHATION SYSTOI PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI9SS901 PAGE 5 PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAKPAYER NAttE/ADOR 58 08-117-23 SI 0001 01900 BALDUR PARK RD CHARLES B RCXD CHARLES B REID 1900 BALDUR PARK RD HAYZATA HN 55391 58 C8-117-2S 51 0002 01598 BALDUR PARK RD R J 8 H A NETT TRUSTEES RICHARD 8 NAROE HETT 1599 BALDUR PARK RD HAYZATA HN ■ 55391 > . i SB Oe-117-25 51 0005 01592 BALDUR PARK RD 0 H O'KEEFE 8 L H O'KEEFE 0 W O'KEEFE 8 L H O'KEEFE 1392 BALDLZ PARK RD HAYZATA HN 55391 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 08*117>25 51 0089 01SB9 BALDUR PARK RD N D 8 J A VERSTEEO NARK D VERSTEEO 1SB9 BALDUR PARK RD HAYZATA HN 55391 58 OB-117'25 31 0005 01576 BALDUR PARR;RD J HANO SDL BOTHHELL-HAHC J HANO SOL BOTHWELL-HANC 1376 BALDUR PARK RD HAYZATA HN 55391 58 08*117-25 51 0006 • 00038 ADDRESS UHASSXONED HXLLXAH J H FRANKLXN WXLLXAN FRANKLXN 1730 NEW BRXONTON DLVD HPLS m 55913 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 08-117*2S 51 0007 00058 ADDRESS UNASSXONEO HXLLXAH J H FRANKLXN HXLLXAH FRANKLXN 1750 NEW BRIGHTON BLVO HPLS HN 5S91S . 38 08-117-25 59 0017 01908 BALDUR PARK RD HXLLXAH L/KRXSTI B ANDERSON HXLLXAH L/KRXSTX B ANDERSON 1908 BALDUR PARK RD HAYZATA HN 55591 . 58 08-117-25 59 0018 01909 BALDUR PARK RD CHARLES AFFXAS CHARLES AFFXAS 2659 JERSEY AVE S ST LOUXS PARK HN 55926 PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 30 08-117-25 59 0051 00058 ADDRESS UNASSXCNED REOXNALO A SPXNOLER R A SPXNDLER SPRXNO FARN 8902 BURROUOHS RD H DEER PARK HA 99006 38 08-117-25 39 0032 00038 ADDRESS UNASSXCNED REOXNALO A SPXNOLER R A SPXNOLER SPRXNO FARH 8902 BURROUGHS RD H DEER PARK HA 99006 38 08-117-23 59 0035 00058 ADDRESS UNASSXi HAROLD R KITCHEN HAROLD KITCHEN r i I ^ • BOX 918 NXSSWA HN 56968 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 08-117-25 39 0059 00058 ADDRESS UNASSXONEO HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55525 TOTAL BATCH 502 00015 • ••• jj" O /' T7 A- ‘ 0 O 1 *1 T # • If ll C'% ■'V'Ja / 1 B. Otrage • •• • •• •• • • • • .X ii. ^ . C. Driveway.... •;x. X •««>«« • •• p. Sidewalk ..X X E Pilio/Deck X X •• • • • F. Landscape Underlcn ByPluc.: Or Fabric X X X •> .•mm • •• • G. Other »• •• • • •• PyOyO^D qARD COVER TN J.n^, ‘ A. House ' X ••»• • • ••LcngU) • • • X X X K Oirage • • C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Pilio/Deck X X F. Landscape _.^.Up4«rlaia. . By Plas:ic Or Fabric X X X 0. Other X • •• ••TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ., TOT^ PROPERTY AREAIN ZONE • A*' + B •. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A * B xIOO Wi<!:h > • • 3B7Z0 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.' A S.F. B % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (f Vtf S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F.' S.F. SF. S F. i7*/0 xlOO JP7 VQ SF. 7. 32 V* A B • •• • SETBA'CK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 JSXISTING HARProvyp y,Qjsqp; A. ’House X L«n|th HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET Q5-2505 250-500' 500-1000' U'i^ih S.F. X m S.F. X • SB'- • - S.F. - X at S.F. • • » • • • . B. Oarage • *- *i *x .^i'SF. • • • ' ~** Cr'Oriveway* • • •• • •• • • X • • • • • S.F. •X S.F. D. Sidewalk X m S.F. .................. X m S.F. mmmm m ** *>* ••• •••■ • E. Patio/Deck • •• • X • m - • M . • ••* S.F. X • •m S.F. -----F; landscape X S.F. —.... Underlain- ................. . A at ..................... S.F. • ByPlas’ic X • S.F. OrFabnc • • A • • • • • • • • • • • . • Q. Other .X S.F. • • •total hardcover in zone TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A H*4Z jd + B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE' A House_____________X xlOO . Ltcifih X X X Wilhh B. Oarage • • C. Driveway 3 3 D. Sidewalk' ZC E. Patio/Deck • •• •• F. Landscape “*• ' Uciderla.n By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE t -----------TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A SOS^O + B /-3y/9o XlOO S.F. A S.F. B . .. 2./Op S.F. /P S.F. ___S.F. SJF. Ssd S.F.. y^o SI. S.F. /S^ S.F. S.F. y^2 0 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 3F. A- 'S F." B ' H 'y Y • •• •••• It* •• ^ • • • 13 ; 4: r ELEVATIOj • H 4* IJliijlllia gig SIS□15 l?r:ir:![^j ijj oTil'i.iia! rbJuLii ^ m’~*’ ' -‘— LgFT gLEVATION gifiurr gLEVATION %GMM> liiiflt Bfillgl Hnii iiBTs* REAR ELEVATION 44* A ir "■ ::i: . s Si :c f iM I ill! LI iii I Tl UPPER FLOOR PLAI tCMA O ..V * ^ags!siss< I i I iilll u I li (a1 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING minutes for may 18,1998 itr - VARIANCE AND^ (#12) #2370 GARY O’KEEFE, 1392 BALDUR PAWC ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-9:42-10:07 P,M. . The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Applicant was present. Oaffron reported this is a request for variances for hardcover as well as a variance and conditiotial use permit for grading wthin 5' of a lot line for construction of a new residence to r^ce toe existing home on the property.' This is a conforming lot as to lot area, and meets the 80% width standard for the LR-IC zone. Applicant proposes to tear down the house znd garage, and replace it with a house that meets the lakeshore setback and side setbacks. The applicant proposes to lower the top of the hill, and this requires grading wthin the 0-75* and 75-250' zones. Gradmg m the site would ro&ult in fill from the new basement excavation being placed near die road to accon^o a e a new attoched garage. The applicant proposes a walkout which requires excavaUon m the 0-75 zone. G«ffron noted that statf recommends approval of a hardcover variance, but because of die mature trees, it is difficult to recommend cutting down the hill. Staff also recommends demal of the excavation to create a walkout based on past City practice and the goals and policies against shoreline topography changes as noted in the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant noted he bought this property with the intent to build a walkout residence. He stated that the neighbors are in favor of cutting down the hill, and this would make a more gradual slope from the lake. Lindquist asked if the hardcover calculations were done by a surveyor. Applicant replied no but he felt they are accurate. Gaffron noted he only included the hardcover items shovwi on the survey. Havvn asked if this was a bluff. Gaffron replied it did not meet the cnteria to be considered as a bluff. Mrs. O’Keefe said there is a hardship, as they need something on the south side of the lot to get to the garage, noting the topography of the site. Lindquist asked for any public comments. There were none. Applicant noted that grading in the 0-75’ zone wiil be necessaiy to remove the present ho “«. “ ttet excavation to create a \valkout would not require much additional work. Gaffron noted that problem is there %vill still be a substantial cutting in the 0-75* zone to create a walkout once the present foundation is removed and the site brought back to match existing grades. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 15,1993 (?4 - #2383 Christine and Gary Valerius - Continued) .. • ^ will require a variance for w-etland credit and lot width. Lot 2 consists of 2.28 acres, with 1.93 acres*^ being buildab]!^- Wetlqjids conj^ri^e a t^al of 1.2 acres for Lots 1 and 2, which will require standard drainage and wretland easements. Counen had directed that the new lot could be sewered. An application has been made to the Watershed District for stormwater review. * ! •, • *• * * ' * • •Van Zomeren stated the e.\isting access to the site is a private driveway off of Bajaidc Road. The applicant needs to supply a well location map and a utility construction plan prior to final plat approval. Christine Valerius stated she will be requesting a wetland credit. Valerius stated Hennepin County has approved the driveway access. Stoddard questioned the need for a lot width variance. Van Zomeren stated the combined lots fall five feet short of the required 400 feet for lot width. No additional land is available for acquisition to avtiid the need for a variance. Van Zomeren noted only Lot 2 would have lake access. There were no public comments. f •» Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, to approve Application #2383 for a two lot subdivision of the property located at 3750 Bayside Road that includes creating one new lot, a lot width variance and wetland credit per Staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. OLD BUSINESS: CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS (#3) #2370 GARY O'KEEFE, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD - VARIANCE AND ^ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:52 p.m. - 9:04 p.ni. 0 Mr. and Mrs. O'Keefe were present. Gaffron reported that the Planning Commission previously reviewrd the application at its May 18, 1998 meeting. The applicant is requesting a hardcover variance as well as a variance and conditional use pemrit for grading w ithin five feet of a lot line and within the 0-75* lakeshore protected area to pcmiit construction of a new residence to replace the existing residence. Gaffron stated the 0-75* protected area exists on both sides of the lot which might constitute a hardship. ■ At its last meeting the Plcinning Commission recommended that the Applicant limit the hardcover to 40% in the 75-250 setback, if possible, and to eliminate the walkout. The Applicant has submitted a revised site plan which reverses the layout of the house and eliminates the walkout, with some proposed changes to the driveway to reduce the hardcover. Gaffron staled a hardcover variance, a conditional use permit and variance for excavation arc required. Staflfjecomnicnded limiting hardcover to 6765 square feet, with the allowable hardcover in the 75-25(Jzone limited to 25% Gaffron noted the revised plan calls for 42.8% hardcover. If the 75 foot setback on both ends of the pared is taken into account, the proposed hardcover w ould be around 33%. In order to grant a variance, the Planning Commission must determine whether a hardship exists with regard to the side setbacks. ORONOPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 15,199S (#3 - ^2370 Gary O'Keefe - Continued) the 40% hardcover limit. Berg felt that the hardcover \N‘as excessive, and suggested the size of the housej^ reduced, noting that thc^pplicant should slay within the height restrictions for that zoningdistrietT '* ' ^ • •• • • • • • • ^ O'Keefe noted that hardcover'was e.xccssive because of the drivewny design based on elevations,• • . not because of a large house. ♦ • Lindquist suggested the desirable amount of hardcover in his view would be 5731 square feet, or 25 percent of the area within the 75 - 250* zone and the south 0 - 75* zone. Chair Smith stated the Applicant has the option of having the Planning Commission vote on the application as currently proposed or tabling the matter to allow the Applicant more time to consider the various options open to him. Smith felt the application as presently submitted would not be recommended for approval, and if denied, there is a mandatory' six month waiting period before a new application can be submitted. O'Keefe stated he has attempted to comply with the requests of the Planning Commission. ***** • Gaffron stated the current proposal for the hardcover is at 33% if you take the 75' setback areas into consideration. In order to reach the 25% hardcover limit, the Applicant must reduce hardcover by 1900 square feet. O'Keefe asked how* remodeling the existing house would affect hardcover percentages. Smith responded that requirements arc the same for both remodeling and new constniction. O'Keefe requested the Planning Commission table the matter. Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application #2370, VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS («5) 2361 WILLIAM AND LAWAYNE YAEGER, 310 BIG ISLAND - VARIAI 9:05 - 9:27 p.m. .S, The Certificate of *ubHcation w’ere noted. Mr. and Mc^^gcr and their attorney. Win Curtis,:scnt Gaffri^^tatcd the applicants arc requesting a lot arca/wy^^arianccHWh^i^^signation of Lot an independent Record Lot in the lakcshorc setbacPSi^j^'lback and hard^li^variances for consiructionof^^^^nal cabin to replace a pre-existing cabin, an^iaij^clha^^SiiH^i^^i^zcbo. Gaffron noted the City rezoned Big Island from LR-1A-1 Single Family Lakcshorc Residential Subdistrict to RS, Seasonal Recreational, back in 1983. Lots 64-65 and Lots 8-9-10-11 were designated as Record Lot 15 by virtue of their common ownership by Roy Ahem. \ aegers have subsequently purchased Lot 64 from Ahem, with Lots 8-9-10-11-65 being owned by Nancy Fames. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 20,1998 (Kirk Otteson, continued) Lindquist statdd hardcover limitTareSJlIHiflQ should be placed against the property resti1c|jiigTirther hardcover. Hawn noted agreement. Stodda«|^^ended his motion by adding the stipulation that no addltlon^hardcover will be allowed on this property. Shlrl» Wlckman staled the Planning Commission Is Inconsistent In ther applying of hardcover restriwons and perhaps should consider adopting a blanket policy to^pndle future hardcover requer Stoddaf^lNed the Planning Commission and City Council have^ld a joint meeting to discuss hardcover r^^^ilgts. and the concensus was to be more consj^^tlvU In granting vanances to hardcover. Chair Smith commentedsoJlIlitardshlp aspects ofth^roperty warrant additional discussion review by the Planning CommlsSSy^ia^terall Ihe^nlng Comml^lon Is trying to honor the existing codes on the books and to be as conslsten^fcjii^gible. Chair Smith said It Is Commission’s Intent to put those proper!^ i I'fWlaiHli who have exceeded the hardcover limit by restricting additional hardcover. Otteson stated he underst le stipulation. Hawn moved, Lln#<(Sst seconded, to add a cllpulallon to the motion «»"!"? hardcover for the property located at 710 North Arm Drive. VOTE ON AMENDMENT AND MOTION: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (#2) 2370 GARY O'KEEFE, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 6:65 p.m. > 7:13 p.m. Mr. and Mrs. Gary O'Keefe were present. Gaffron reported that the Planning Commission previously reviewed the June 15.1998 meeiings. The Planning Commission recommended the Applicants limit hartwver to 25 percent Jfi the combined 75*-250* and south 0-75* zones. The Applicants were also requested to submit a revised grading plan. Gaffron staled the Applicants have submitted a revised plan calling for a square feel which meets the Planning Commission's recommendation fro'y the last meeting. Tne revised plan calls for a newly constmeted one-story home with an attached three stall Applicants are requesting a variance to the hardcover to add an additional 300 s^l^^re P . • which would yield final hardcover of 6.025 square feet or 26.3 percent. Minor grading Is proposed the north 0'-75' zone to blend contours from old foundation to new home. The yaP'fJfl plan needs to be further defined If revisions are still planned along the north 0-75 lot hne. The Applicants are also proposing to construct an optional retention pond In the south 0-75 zone tor potential mitigation of additional hardcover. Gaffron commented this new proposal meets the Planning Commission's recommendations from the prior meeting, and Staff is comfortable with the revised plan. Gatfron noled Resolution No. 2831 adopted back In 1990 granted contained language In the resolution which led the Applicant to conclude that he was ent Page 2 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 27,1998 % • ^ I « : F (#7) #2370 GARY O’KEEFE, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD- VARIANCES- RESOLUTION NO. 4128 Mrs. O’Keefe was present. Gaffron reported that the applicants were requesting a hardcover variance and conditional use permit and variance for grading within 5' of a lot line and within the 0-75' lakeshore setback to construct a new residence. The revised site plans meet the Planning Commission recommendation to maintain 25% hardcover, which is a decrease from 7,258 s.f. to 5,725 s.f. The applicants also* proposed a pond but the Plaiming Commission did not want to tie variance approvals to stormwater management Gaf&on noted that no decks were proposed for this lakeshore property. The applicants have indicated they are willing to give up decks for living space, although a future owner may seek variance for a deck. Both Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of the proposed plans. Jabbour commented that Council had given Plaiming Commission direction to limit the number of variances. Goetten indicated that she had been at rivo Planning Commission meetings, and the current plan was a good compromise for the property. Kelley expressed concern about the mass of buildings on lakeshore properties. He questioned if Council would want to add a condition limiting additional mass, such as a second story, for this residence. Jabbour agreed with Kelley that massing is an issue and Council should continue to monitor lakeshore structures for excessive mass in future applications. Goetten requested stronger wording in the resolution on Page 5, Condition 2. The word "likely" is to be removed indicating that no future increase in hardcover will be approved. Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4128 granting hardcover variances in the 75-250' zone to permit construction of a new residence, and to permit grading and land alterations within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area. Vote: 5 Ayes, 0 Nays. ! ORONO crry council meeting MINUTES FOR AUGUST 10,1998 % \ • •■jhe PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS'-LIZ HAWN, REPRESENTATIVE • * • • Commissioner Hawn had no comments. * PUBLIC COMMENTS ^ Gary O’Keefe, 1392 Baldur Park Road, requested an amendment to his building plan that was approved at the July 27 Council meeting to include a patio. He proposed to reduce fee 3 car gamge to a 2 car garage, with a full storage area beneath fee garage, to allow for fee addition of a patio. Gaf&on commented feat fee revised plan seemed to meet fee intent of fee previous resolution. He further explained that hardcover would be reduced to allow for a patio by reducing fee size of fee driveway and some rooms in fee house, as well as the elimination of a garage stall. I » • Goetten expressed concern about fee proposed lower level storage area. GafGron responded feat no hard surface was proposed in front of fee storage area. It would be accessed by a side service door and would be used for storage of lawn mowers, snowmobiles, etc. Kelley requested feat fee resolution include language stating feat no future drive to fee lower level storage area would be allowed, as well as no increase in hardcover. Gaffron agreed to amend the resolution approved at fee July 27 meeting, and place the amended resolution on the August 24,1998 Council agenda for final Council approval. Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to reconsider Application #2370 for Gary O’Keefe for the property located at 1392 Baldur Park Road. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to amend Resolution No. 4128 to include the following: Elimination of the third garage stall. Patio to be allowed. - No drive will be allowed to the lower level storage area. - No future variances will be granted. - Upper level garage will be limited to bvo stalls. - Lower level storage area svill be for cold storage only. - The revised proposal meets the intent of the original resolution. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITYof ORONO 41 «i RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 i 4 3 : A RESOLUTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 4128 GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2; SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8; AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISIONS 16(J) AND 16(L) AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION lOM SUBDIVISION 19 - FILE #2370 • • •• •*WHEREAS, Gary O’Keefe (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 1392 Baldur Park Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 17 and 18, Block 1, Baldur Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2; 10.55, Subdivision 8; and 10.56, Subdivision 16(J) and 16(L) to permit the construction of a new residence constituting hardcover in the 75-250’ zone in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed in that zone, and to permit grading and land alterations vdthin the 0-75' lakeshore protected area where such work is normally prohibited. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Miimesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2370. 2. The property is 0.71 acres in area and is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. Page 1 of 6 Ok O W \CITY of ORONO <« •. iV RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL • • NO. - ^ ^ 7.The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for the proposed grading in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zones as proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will such use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use.of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2; 10.55, Subdivision 8; and 10.56, Subdivisions 16(J) and 16(L) to permit the construction of a new residence and amenities constituting hardcover on the property of 5,725 s.f. per the approved revised site and hardcover plan attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, and further grants a Conditional Use Permit for land alterations within the 0-75' lakeshore protected zones and within 5' of a lot line per the approved grading plan and site plan attached to this resolution as Exhibit B, subject to the following conditions: 1.No hardcover will be allowed in the northerly 0-75' zone. The only hardcover allow*ed in the 0-75' zone will be the portion of driveway as shown on the approved site plans. Hardcover in the southerly 0-75' and 75-250' zones shall not exceed the square footages per the site plan and hardcover worksheet attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, and shall not in any case exceed 5,725 s.f. in total. 2.Applicant is advised that hardcover on the property based on this approval will exceed tlie normal limits, and any future proposal to increase hardcover on the properly will not be approved. It is the intent of the City Council that the level of hardcover approved with this resolution not be exceeded in the future, and that no additional hardcover variances will be granted in the future. Page 3 of 6 CITY of ORONO u .. h' resolution of the city council NO. 4 1 ^ Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 24th day of August, 1998. ATTEST: Linda S. Vce, City Clerk Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of August, 1998, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page S of 6 • •■ ■ ’ i 1% ^ij — — *--- / r- 1T'T——^*p“ ■^7••-•^- approved HARDCOVERJ js^-. • I *'* Nl- — ^ ■• ••* < 0«7S* North: NONE 1. __I \ 8 ^ ^v--y V« 75-150* & 0-75* South (Art* - 21.W0 *0' ^ ,f It House ’.(A ,f li AnachrfMtsUOar.60 ‘W” \ I' Swop, valhJ ind po^® , ,f Driveway 5.725 sf t M A 5,725/22.900-25% I Kkk I * \. w ^ • V.U. v.^;if—- • ____ U- / KV • f Ur'f »0,# V. '..*io.l.**- ri • A 'll ■ L'., ,',i • lU Bv<«C«l. /::«A . 7 I rib>.|»4Ac;<. BJiaio • 0 •/N/• f • VJ/ 3r f —S 1 jJ • ! 1' *.t,K I tP 5 V.— I S -“K, -: 2 • r • • fc, * _ I ?1TJ • /.—. •••^* . — .1_' .1.■ • •• -1 tf' • ••• • o •• •••*c . •• •* «i* •• • » i • t .' -(^-—l-l-^/' <y:> ^ c> o • « • • % • . • % Wo r ■\^r ^ a . 5 % • ••• ¥' f H r»)*i» -• • i‘- .. ^lLa4ir^i!_______^fs-iutfetetgJ^ __________^ — iT'Ml __ firr.yitruK Xltrtfyf-HVy r ^ To:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Michael P. Gafifron, Senior Planning Coordinator/^ March 9,1999 Subject: Proposed Zoning Amendment: Eliminate LR-lC-1 50% Density Credit List of Exhibits A - Draft Amendment: Options 1 and 2 B - LR-lC-1 Impacts of Shoreland PRD Standards C - Shoreland PRD Standards, Section 10.56 Subd. 19 D - Letter from Paul Larson, 3790 Shoreline Drive E - Memo & Selected Exhibits of 2-10-99 At the February meeting. Planning Commission members reacted favorably to eliminating the 50% density credit in LR-lC-1 (see 2-10-99 memo). They also indicated that retaining the ability to attach dwelling units in LR-lC-1 may still be appropriate after the 50% density credit is eliminated. This item was tabled so that staff could review whether the revision creates or continues any ordinance conflicts with the Shoreland PRD standards of Section 10.56 Subd. 19, or with the hardcover requirements found elsewhere in the code. Shoreland PRD Standards The existing LR-lC-1 density credit is further limited in the Shoreland Overlay District by the Shoreland PRD standards in Section 10.56. Specifically, a Site "Suitable Area" Calculation must be performed by dividing a shoreland property into 'tiers' of specified depth (200' in sewered zones) and dividing the creditable (non-wetland, non-bluff, non-lake) area of each tier by the minimum lot area requirement of the underlying district. In LR-lC-1, the current minimum lot area requirement would be considered as 1/3 acre rather than 1/2 acre for this calculation. The resulting figure after the calculation is the number of dwelling units allowed within each tier. Fractional units can be transferred to a tier further from the lake. As depicted in Exhibit B, the Shoreland standards would in most cases allow a slightly lesser number of total units than the LR-lC-1 density might allow. This is the case whether the density remains at 3 units per acre or is amended to 2 units per acre. Perhaps a greater impact of the Shoreland PRD standards when applied to a relatively small or narrow LR-lC-1 property, is that the attached units will likely end up being located in the second or third tiers, i.e. a greater lakesl ore setback is needed in order to have all units attached and still meet the tier unit limits. Staff does not necessari^> view the Shoreland PRD standards as conflicting with the LR-lC-1 standards; rather, ther are complementary, providing a higher standard for the Shoreland District. LR-lC-1 Amendment March 9,1999 Page 2 It may be appropriate to reference the Shoreland PRD standards in the LR-lC-1 section so that the Shoreland standards are not overlooked, especially since a majority of the LR-lC-1 properties yet to be developed are in the Shoreland District. Hardcover Standards The LR-lC-1 hardcover limits of Section 10.26, Subd. 3D would appear to allow hardcover up to 35% in areas more than 100' from the shoreline. This is in conflict with the standards found elsewhere in the code vdiich allow only 25% hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone, 30% in the 250- 500' zone, and 35% in the 500-1000' zone. It is unknown whether this was done on purpose as a concession to the LR-IC-I district, but it does create potential confusion. Staff recommends that if the LR-lC-1 district is amended rather than eliminated, Subd. 3D should be revised to conform to the hardcover standards found elsewhere in the code. Public Comments The City has received a letter from Paul Larson, owner of a 2-acre parcel in LR-lC-1, in opposition to the proposed elimination of the 50% density credit. He believes his property will become less valuable if the credit is eliminated, since he will lose 1/3 of the potential dwelling units he might be allowed under the current code. Staff Recommendation Retention of the ability in LR-lC-1 to create attached dwelling units would enable clustering and the preservation of trees and green space that is not possible in the LR-IC zone. If this option is chosen, reference to the Shoreland PRD regulations should be added to the LR-1 C-1 language. Also, the hardcover standard should be revised to match the standards found elsewhere in the zoning code. Elimination of the 50% credit without retaining the ability for attached units, would functionally remove any distinguishing characteristics between the LR-IC and LR-lC-1 Districts. In this case, it would be most appropriate to eliminate the LR-lC-1 designation from the zoning code, and rezone all LR-lC-1 properties to LR-IC. Staff has drafted 2 options for amending the LR-lC-1 District for discussion and recommendation (Exhibits A). The first option has been revised since the last meeting to include the Shoreland reference and the hardcover amendment noted above. LR-lC-1 Amendment March 9,1999 Page 3 Options for Action 1. * * 2. 3. 4. Recommend that LR-1C- i be amended to eliminate 50% density credit but allow attachment of units via PRD to remain, adding Shoreland reference and revising hardcover standard. Recommend that LR-lC-1 be eliminated entirely, and that all LR-lC-1 properties be rezoned to LR-IC. Recommend that the LR-lC-1 zoning standards not be amended. Other. OPTION 1 A: a. Delete language allowing 50% density credit b. Add language specifically allowing attached dweliing units as a Conditional Use but onty if Council determines the PRD provisions are met c. Add provbion to limit density to 2 dweliing units per acre d. (Added 3-2-99) Add reference to Shoreland PRD standards, change hardcover SEC. 10.26. LR-lC-1 SUBDISTRICTS. ONE FAMILY LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL. Subd. 1. Lakeshore Set Back, Hard Cover and Tree Removal Regulations. (See Section 10.22). Subd. 2. Permitted Uses, Conditional Uses, and Accessory Uses. A. Any use as regulated in the ”LR-1C” District. Subd. 3. Additional Permitted Conditional Use. Within any "LR-lC-1" One Family Lakeshore Residential Subdistrict a credit allowing a 50% inetcase in dwelling urnt densi^ ever tlw »w ay wbtfiined ftttar.hpH Hwellings mav be permitted if the City Council finds that previdtng all conditions below are complied with: A. All provisions of Section 10.32 Planned Residential Development are* in the discretion of the Council, determined to be met eemplied with: B. Public sanitary sewer is available; C. All dwelling units must be attached but not more than four dwelling units to any one structure with a maximum height of thirty (30) feet; D. Pareels of land lying beyond 100 feet from any sheteliae shall net have mere than 35%r ef the land area to be developed made impervieus by buildings, Maektep, er ether femij of hard eever All hardcover standards qfSect ion 10.22. Subd. 2 are met: E. Building size and location meet Council approval; F. Vehicle ingress and egress meet Council approval; G. A minimum of two parking spaces are provided for each dwelling umt, one of the parking spaces shall be enclosed and attached to the principal structure it serves; H. Density provisions under Section 10.60 arc not exceeded, apd ths dwelling unit density does not exceed 2 dwelling imits per acre. I All Shoreland PRD standards of Section 10.56. Su bd 19 are met for properties in the Shoreland Overlay District. Subd. 4. Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements. (See Section 10.25, Subdivision 6). OPTION 2: a. Delete entire Section 10.26 b. Rezone all properties in LR>1C-1 to LR-IC RESIBEWTIAL. ----------------Subd. 1. § ■Lakeshere Set Back,- Hard Cover and Tree Removal Regulations. (See Section 10.22). -----------------SuM. 2. Permitted Uses, Conditional Uaes, and Aeeesaety Uaea. -------------------------A; Any vat aa regulat ed in the "LR-IC" Diatriet -----------------Snbd. 3. Additional Permitted Use. Within emy "LR-lC-F One Family Lakeahore Residential Subdiatriet a credit allowing n 509(> inereoae in dwelling unit-density over the "LR-IC" Distriet may be obtained providing all eonditions below are eomplied with; A:—All previsions of Section 10.32 Planned Residential Development are complied with; ■B:—Public sanitaiy sewer is available; — C.—All dwelling units must be attached but net mete than fouf dwelling units to any one stmetufe with a maximum height • of thirty 30 feet; -------------------------B:—Pafcels of land lying beyond 100 feet from any shofcline shall not have mere than 3S9(i of the land area to be developed made impervious by building s, blacktop, or ether feims of hard cover,---------- -------------------------Er.—Building size and location meet Council approval;---------- F:—Vehicle ing ress and eg ress meet Council approval; -------------------------G:—A minimum of two parking spaces are provided for each dwelling unit, ene ef the parking spaces shall be enclosed and attached to the principal stmeture it serves;------- -------------------------H:—Density previsions under Section 10.60 are net exceeded. Subd. 4. Area, Height, Let Width and Yard Requirements. (See Section 10.25, Subdivision 6). LR-lC-1 Shoreland PRD Standards Review - All LR-lC-1 properties are on/near General Development lake and are sewered. The tier depths are: Tier 1:200* Tier 2: 200* Tier 3:200* Tier 4: 200* Tier 5: 200* Example 1: LR-lC-1 properties between the marinas on Worth Shore Drive. " The westerly 1.5 acres has just been platted and new homes are being built. The remaining 4 tax parcels each contain an existing residence. If all 4 were acquired for redevelopment as a PRD under LR-lC-1 standards, total site area is about 1.5 acres Tier 1 = 0.6 acre. Tier 2(as measured from 2 bays and lagoon) = 0.9 acre. " Under existing 3 unit<t/acre LR-lC-1 stmiHnrd* ✓ Tier 1 = 0.6/0.33 = 1.8 units (round to 1 unit) credit =.8 unit ✓ Tier 2 = 0.9/0.33 = 2.7 units + 0.8 units = 3.5 units (round to 3 units) ✓ Total units allowed is 4 units, and all must be attached to at least one other unit, and at least 3 of 4 must be wholly located in Tier 2 - Under proposed 2 units per acre LR-IC standard! / Tier 1 = 0.6/0.5 = 1.2 imits (round to 1 unit) credit = .2 unit ✓ Tier 2 = 0.9/0.5 = 1.8 units + .2 units = 2units Total allowed is 3 units, and all three must be attached to each other, and at least 2 of 3 must be wholly located in Tier 2 Example 2:LR-lC-1 properties owned by Sohns and Larson at 3770 and 3790 Shoreline Drive. Each property contains a number of buildings which would presumably be removed if the properties are developed as a single PRD. Total site area is 4.5 acres, and has property only in Tiers 4 and 5 Tier 4 as measured from the shoreline of Spring Park Bay is 1.0 acre; Tier 5 is 1.8 acres; the remaining 1.7 acres at the northeasterly comer of the site is not in the shoreland district. Under existing 3 units/acre LR-1G-1 standard; ✓ Tier 4 =1.0/0.33 = 3.0 units ✓ Tier 5 = 1.8/0.33 = 5.45 units (round to 5 units) credit = 0.45 units / Remainder = 1.7/0.33 = 5.15 + 0.45 = 5.60 units (round to 5 units) / Total allowed is 13 units, of which no more than 3 could be in Tier 4 and no more than 5 in Tier 5 (or place 0 in Tier 4, up to 8 in Tier 5) Under proposed 2 units/acre LR-IC standard: ✓ Tier 4 = 1.0/0.5 = 2.0 units ✓ Tier 5 = 1.8/0.5 = 3.6 units (round to 3 units) credit = 0.6 units ✓ Remainder = 1.7/0.5 = 3.4 + 0.6 = 4.0 units / Total allowed is 9 units, of which no more than 2 could be in Tier 4 and no more than 4 in Tier 5 (or place 0 in Tier 4, up to 6 in Tier 5) LR-1C>1 : Impacts of Shorelaod PRD Standards - All LR-lC-1 properties are on/near General Development lake and are sewered. The tier depths are: Tier 1:200’ Tier 2: 200' Tier 3:200' Tier 4: 200' Tier 5: 200’ Example 1: LR-lC-1 properties between the marinas on North Shore Drive. - The westerly 1.5 acres has just been platted and new homes are being built. The remaining 4 tax parcels each contain an existing residence. - If all 4 were acquired for redevelopment as a PRD under LR-lC-1 standards, total site area is about 1.5 acres Tier 1 = 0.6 acre, Tier 2(as measured from 2 bays and lagoon) = 0.9 acre. Under existing 3 units/acre LR-lC-1 standard: / Tier 1 = 0.6/0.33 = 1.8 units (round to 1 unit) credit =.8 unit / Tier 2 = 0.9/0.33 = 2.7 units + 0.8 units = 3.5 units (round to 3 units) / Total units allowed is 4 units, and all must be attached to at least one other unit, and at least 3 of 4 must be wholly located in Tier 2 Under proposed 2 units per acre T.R-1 T stanHardr / Tier 1 = 0.6/0.5 = 1.2 units (round to 1 unit) credit = .2 unit / Tier 2 = 0.9/0.5 = 1.8 units + .2 units = 2units / Total allowed is 3 units, and all three must be attached to each other, and at least 2 of 3 must be wholly located in Tier 2 Example 2:LR-lC-1 properties owned by Sohns and Larson at 3770 and 3790 Shoreline Drive. Each property contains a number of buildings which would presumably be removed if the properties are developed as a single PRD. Total site area is 4.5 acres, and has property only in Tiers 4 and 5 Tier 4 as measured from the shoreline of Spring Park Bay is 1.0 acre; Tier 5 is 1.8 acres; the remaining 1.7 acres at the northeasterly comer of the site is not in the shoreland district. Under existing 3 units/acre LR-lC-1 standard: / Tier 4 = 1.0/0.33 = 3.0 units ✓ Tier 5 = 1 .8/0.33 = 5.45 units (round to 5 units) credit = 0.45 units / Remainder = 1.7/0.33 = 5.15 + 0.45 = 5.60 units (round to 5 units) / Total allowed is 13 units, of which no more than 3 could be in Tier 4 and no more than 5 in Tier 5 (or place 0 in Tier 4, up to 8 in Tier 5) Under proposed 2 units/acre LR-1 C standard: / Tier 4=1.0/0.5 = 2.0 units Tier 5 = 1.8/0.5 = 3.6 units (round to 3 units) credit = 0.6 units Remainder = 1.7/0.5 = 3.4 + 0.6 = 4.0 units Total allowed is 9 units, of which no more than 2 could be in Tier 4 and no more than 4 in Tier 5 (or place 0 in Tier 4, up to 6 in Tier 5) / / / L hT 2. I ^ I i^\T TTt^ T^tJ^y^Nxrr -Xt^TM^ r: 3 (AfJ^rs ^ % iAA^rr5//^c42^ * / Mwrr 7tT-Av » H u^J'TT r * 3 t<~'" -J»T«»V » ^ WMITS •T/g«- S -rr«r«. S'* 5" ■rw*^ * *3 1"'^ jiisr? I i i 1 I 1 I I § 10.56 E. Lakeshore Access i^areas by accesses to public waters or must meet or owners of non-riparian ^°bs wi . ^ Subdivision 16 of thisexceed the minimum standards set forth xn &uoa section. • Subd. 19. PRD/POD Standards. Developments" or PRDs ) land, redevelopment of District for new projects on ® £ existing buildings and pJl^fously built sites, or use are 1. Rezoning to M-6 Distr^l:.^ 6 PRD shall not be allowed within the Shore land TST«r»r.O,1 nn B. ithin the^Highway iVcSrridor as Developments are limited to !|^^pgVgpsive Plan Amendment No. 2r&uhi" s.‘ apply: overlay District ‘>h«^^ co^^ctal POy’re«fopm«Vwit^^^^ SiSfri? Resources l^ensure C. Processing of D Application for a Planned Residential request: 1. A site plan , lxist“ing^°and^Trop°o^se^d ""st"^^^^ ' (whe?e i^"ri'c\y°.t*eis"\\^U'irpr%^^^^^^^^ and topographic contours at 2 foot intervals. ORONO CC 376-22 (2-24-92) 2. mandatory membershlpf this ordinance. S 10.56 Property ovmers association agree ment, with, in accordance with the requirements of 3. Deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements or other instruments that: a) Properly address future vegetative and topographic alterations, construction of additional buildings, and beaching of watercraft; b) Ensure the long-term preservation and maintenance of open space in accordance with the criteria and analysis specified in this ordinance. 4. Those additional docxments as requested by the City of Orono that are necessary to explain how the PRD will be designed and will function. E. Site "Suitable Area" Evaluation. Proposed new or' expansions to existing PRDs must be evaluated using the following procedures and standards to determine the suitable area for the dwelling unit/dwelling site density evaluation. • 1. The project parcel must be divided into tiers by locating one or more lines approximately parallel to a line that identifies the Ordinary High Water-Level at the following intervals, proceeding landward: Shoreland Tier Dimensions General development lakes- first tier General development lakes- recond and additional tiers Recreational development lakes Natural environment lakes Tributaries sewered Sewered (feet)(feet) 200 200 267 200 267 267 400 320 300 300 I I I i Ie I #I I I I I I I I 2. The suitable area within each tier is next calculated by excluding from the tier area all wetlands, bluffs or land below the Ordinary High Water Level of public waters. suitable area and the proposed project are then subjected to the PRD density evaluation steps to arrive at an allowable number of dwelling u^ts or sites. ORONO CC 376-23 (Z-24-92) •••»• • \ t 1 i .t I f 4 I I 3 i § 10.56 F. PRD 'Allowable Density' Evaluation. The procedures for determining the allowable density of a-PRD xs as follows: 1, The suitable area within each tier is divided by the single residential lot si*® standard of the underlying soning district, yielding the allowable number of dwelling units or sites for each tier (Fractxons shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number, but may be transferred as noted below). 2, Allowable densities or numbers of units or excess fractions of un: ts may be transferred ^^ ® any other tier further from the water body, but must not be transferred to any other tier closer. 3, No density increases based on increased setbacks or other factors will be allowed. G. Maintenance and Administration Requirements. 1. Before final approval of a PRD, adequate provisions must be developed for Preservation and perpetuity of open spaces and for the contxnued existence a functioning of the development. 2. Open Space Preservation. Deed restrictions, covenemts, permanent easements, acceptance or other equally effective and permanent means mu provided to ensure long-term preservation and spVce. . The instruments must include all of the following protections : a. Commercial uses prohibited. b. Vegetation and topographic alterations other than routine maintenance prohibited. c. Construction of additional buildings or storage of vehicles and other materials prohibited. d. Uncontrolled beaching of watercraft prohibited. 3. Development, organization and fiinctioning. nniess an eoually effective alternative community framework xs eStIblished, when applicable, all PRO'S must use an owners association with the following features: a. Membership must be mandatory for each dwelling unit or site purchaser and any successive purchasers. b. Each member must pay a pro rata share of the Association's expenses, and unpaid assessments can become liens on units or sites. ORONO CC -■376-24 (2-24-92) S 10.56 c. Assessments must be adjustable to accomodate changing conditions. d. The Association must be responsible for insurance, taxes, and maintenance of all commonly owned property and facilities. H. Open Space Requirements. PRD's must contain open space meeting all of the following criteria: 1. At least 50% of the total project area must be preserved as open space. 2. The following items shall not be included in the computation of minimum open space: a. Dwelling units or sites. b. Road rights-of-way. c. Land covered by road surfaces. d. Parking areas. e. Structures. f. Commercial facilities or uses. 3. The following items shall be included the computation of minimum open space: a.Wetlands. b. Significant historic sites. c. Unplatted cemeteries. d. Other areas with physical characteristics unsuitable for development in their natural state. e. The lakeshore setback zone, based on normal required structure setbacks, must be included as open space. For PRDs, the entire lakeshore setback zone must be preserved in its natural or existing state, except for those improvements necessary to provide reasonable pedestrian access to the water noay as regulated elsewhere in the zoning code. 4. Open space may include subsurface sewage treatment systems if the use of the space is restricted to avoid adverse impacts on the systems. ORONO CC 376-25 (2-24-92) § 10.56 5. The appearance of open space areas, including topography, vegetation, and allowable uses, must be preserved by use of restrictive deed covenants, permanent easen^nts, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means. . . Erosion Control and Stormwater Management. stormwater management plans must be developed and the PRD must: ^ . i i t designed and the construction managed to minimize the likelihood of serious erosion occurring either after construction. This must be accomplished by limiting the amount and length of time of bare ground exposure. Temporary ground covers, sediment entrapment facilities, vegetated buffered strips, or other appropriate techniques must be used to minimize erosion impacts on surface water features. Erosion control plans approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District y b e r e q uired if project size and site physical characteristics warraiit; and , 2. Be designed and constructed to effectively manage reasonably ^expected quantities and qualities of storm water run-off. Impervious surface coverage within any tier must not exceed 25% of the tier area except that credit for unused hardcover allowance in tiers near the lake may be used in tiers further from ,. . ^' Centralization and Design of Facilities. Centralization and design of facilities and structures must be done according to the following standards: 1. PRD's must be connected to publicly owned .‘^^^er supply and sewer systems, if available. On-site-water suoply and sewage treatment systems must be centralized and designed*and installed to meet or exceed applicable standards or rules of the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and as regulated elsewhere in this ordinance. On-site sewage treatment systems must be located on the most suitable areas of the development, and sufficient lawn area free of limiting factors must be provided for a replacement soil treatment system for each sewage system. 2. Dwelling units or sites must be clustered into one or more groups and located on suitable areas of the development. They must be designed and located to meet or exceed the following dimensional standards for the relevant shoreland classification: a. Level. features. Setback from the Ordinary High Water Elevatxon above the surface water ORONO CC c. Maximiua height. 376-26 • • (Z-24-92) § 10.56 3. Shore recreation facilities including but not limited to swimming areas , docks aind watercraft, mooring areas, must be centralized and located in an area suitable for them. Evaluation of suitability must include consideration of land slope, water depth, vegetation, soils, depth to ground water and bedrock or other relevemt factors. The number of dwelling units or sites which may be granted lake access shall not exceed the number of riparian dwelling units or sites which could be created under a standard subdivision. The allowable number of dock slips or moorings and the designation of which dwelling units or sites shall have the right to use those slips or moorings shall be subject to Council approval and shall be defined in the covenants governing the PRD. Xn no case shall the number of slips or moorings exceed the number allowed under the official controls of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. All docks serving three or more dwelling units shall be subject to the Joint Use Dock Licensing requirements in Chapter 5 of the Orono Municipal Code. 4. Structures. Parking areas and other facilities must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters 2md adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color, or other means acceptable to the City, asstuning summer, leaf-on conditions. Vegetative and topographic screening must be preserved, if existing, or may be required to be provided. 5. Accessory structures and facilities must meet the required principal structure setback and must be centralized, except for those pedestrian access and equipment storage structures allowed elsewhere in this code. K. Conversion. Existing resorts or other land uses and may be converted to Planned Residential Developments if all of the following standards are met: 1. Proposed conversions must be initially evaluated using the same procedures for PRD's involving all new construction. Inconsistencies between existing features of the development and these standards must be identified. 2. Deficiencies involving water supply and sewage treatment, impervious coverage, open space, and shore recreation facilities must be corrected as part of the conversion or as specified in the conditional use permit. 3. Shore setback zone and bluff impact zone deficiencies must be evaluated and reasonable improvements be made as part of the conversion. These improvements must include where applicable the following: a. Removal of extraneous ‘buildings, docks, or other facilities that no longer need to be located in shore setback zone or bluff impact zone. ORONO CC 376-27 (2-24-92) » I I I I § 10.56 • b. Remedial measures to correct erosion sites and improve vegetative cover and screening of buildings and other facilities as viewed from the water. ■ c. If existing dwelling units are located in the shore setback zone or bluff impact zone, conditions shall be attached to approvals of conversions that preclude exterior expansions in any dimension or substantial The conditions r.u«*t also provide for future relocation of dwell g units, where feasible, to other locations, meeting all setback and alteration requirements when they are rebuilt or replaced. 4, Existing dwelling unit or dwelling site densities that exceed the standards in Subdivision 19 allowed to continue but must not be allowed to b® at the time of conversion or in the future. ™ during the conversion to limit impacts of high reouiring seasonal use, improving vegetative ..creening, centralizing shore recreation facilities, installing new sewag treatment systems, or other means . Subd. 20. Riparian Access and Rights. For P^°P®^^i®® which as a result of the designation of the this the boundary of a lake, stream, or tributary, no section of this Code shall be construed as obligating th^e sT^ variances to provisions of the Code prohibiting P^y®!^ improvements, structures or land Code wetlands, flood plain areas or shorelands. Nothing in the Code shall be considered as establishing or increasing riparian rign^s. This section of the Code is intended to regulate land use and establish building and zoning restrictions only. Subd. 21. Amendments. All amendments including anendinents to the official maps, must be submitted to the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources sdoDtion. Further, amendments to underlying zoning distr standards which may be in conflict with this ? submitted to the commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources prior to adoption. • Source: Ordinance No. 101, 2nd Series Adopted: 2-24-92 (Sections 10.57 through 10.59, inclusive, reserved for future exoansion.) ORONO CC 376-28 (2-24-92) March 4.1999 City Of Orono 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono, MN 5S356 Re: Proposed zoning change LR-lC-1 Subdistrict. RSCESVED MAR 0 8 1999 CITY Ur OHOiMO To whom it may concern, / Have recently become aware of the cities wish to_ rezone my property at 3790 Shoreline Dr. I have two acres at this location, ctarentfyquali/ing for six units to built on the property.^ The property was purchased many years ago as an investment, with the intent of developing it in the future. The land is my retirement investment, and any down zoning that would affect the value of the land would be a great flnancial hardship to my self and my family. Anyone that has inspected the property would agrre that it’s not an appropriate location for single family homes. The land abuts B-1 commercial, and land used for industrial purposes on each side, “nie west side Heimepin County Truck facility b a noby nubance, and b used as a hazardous waste processing site. I have a train coming by every other day on the north. 20,000 can per day, and a church/school yard on the south. Worst of all, I have a nonconforming junk yard, and gravel pit on the east side. I’m aware that the city recently approved 29 townhomes to be built just 150 feet east of my property. I would expect the same zoning allowance on my property as well. If I need to apply to develop my land now I’m willing to do that If the City Of Orono would like to purchase my property for fair market value, I would be willing to sell. I have apprabed the prr^rty at $180,000. That’s a conservative $30,000 per lot/unit IftheCityOf Orono reduces my building eligibility by two units. I’m obviously damaged by $60,000 in property value. I would accept that amount as liquidated damages subject to my attorneys approval. I drink that my property is unique in ib location and should be excluded from your proposed zoning change. If the City Of Orono would like to clean up the neighborhood, you should concentrate on eliminating the non-conforming uses on both sides of my land. The proposed change would only create more non-conforming use of all the townhomes existing, and to be built just east of my property. Please call my with any questions or comments. Sincerely, y Paul Larsori BuUder/Re&itor 471-9122 471-2216 / To:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Michael P. Gaffiron, Senior Planning Coordinato^^^^ February 10,1999 Subject: Proposed Zoning Amendment: Eliminate LR-lC-150% Density Credit List of Exhibits A - Draft Amendment: Options 1 and 2 10.26: LR-IC and LR-lC-1 Zoning Standards ^cj^tters from Area Residents D • Comprehensive Plan Excerpts E^R-lC-1 Zoning Maps of Areas Notified of Hearing by Mail O - Public Hearing Notice H - Staff Memos and Exhibits of 5-8-98 and 11-6-98 Background The City Council adopted an interim moratorium in May 1998 temporarily suspending use of the 50% density credit in the LR-lC-1 zoning subdistrict. This moratorium was established due to a development proposal that Council believed would add too much traffic to the local streets, and would add to the high volume of traffic that is already overburdening County Road 15. The properties zoned LR-lC-1 arc located along County Road 15 in Navarre and adjacent to marinas on County Road 51 on Maxwell Bay. The existing neighborhoods surrounding these areas were developed prior to the City's adoption of zoning regulations, and are generally developed much rnore intensely than would be allo\^ imder the current zoning regulations. The City Council is concerned that the current density credit language does not provide sufficient discretion to the City to ensure a development is platmed in such a way that it provides sufficient open space, landscaping and access options to somevdiat balance the intensity of the surrounding development and minimize the traffic impacts. Due to these concerns, the City Council has asked the Planning Commission to review the LR-lC-1 standards, hold a public hearing, and make a recommendation regarding elimination of the 50% density credit. LR-lC-1 Standards The only difference between the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshoic Residential District (1/2 acre rriinimum, i.e. 2 units per acre) and the LR-lC-1 Subdistrict, is the LR-lC-1 allowance for a 50% density credit, i.e. up to 3 units per acre. To get the credit, development must proceed as a Planned Residential Development (PRD), and all units must be attached (groups of 2,3 or 4 units) in order to gain the credit. Additional requirements must be met regarding sanitary sewer, hardcover, building size and location, vehicle ingress and egress, parking, and overall density. Zoning Amendment: LR-lC-1 Density Credit February 10,1999 Page 2 LR-lC-1 History The LR-lC-1 subdistrict was created in 1975 as part of the general rezoning of the City. There were likely two specific reasons to create the LR-lC-1 subdistrict in 1975: % •• • 1. A majority of the properties rezoned to LR-lC-1 in 1975 were zoned B-1 (Commercial Business), B-2 (Lakeshore Commercial), or I (Industnal) prior to the rezoning, and the density credit may have been a concession to the property owners for the rezoning from Commercial/Industrial to residential. 2. The LR-lC-1 would provide a location in the City for somewhat higher density housing than the 1/2 acre residential district allowed, and allow such housing to be attached for more efficient use of the land. The properties zoned LR-1C-1 upon adoption of the 1975 zoning code included the following: The Navarre theatre property. - All land west of the Navarre theatre between County Road 15 and the railroad tracks to the city border, except the Hennepin County truck station site. Approximately 5 acres at the southeast comer of Carman Street and County Road 15, north of the lagoon. - The area east of Lakeside Marina on North Shore Drive to the east boundary of north Shore Marina (included North Shore Marina). In November 1976 the B-5 Limited Neighborhood Business District was created and most of the LR- lC-1 parcels between County Road 15 and the tmck station property were rezoned to B-5. In 1984, North Shore Marina was rezoned back to B-2 Lakeshore Business. As a result of these two revisions, the remaining properties within the LR-lC-1 today include (See Exhibit E): - The 9-acre plat of'Navarro' on the old Navarre Theatre site (24 twinhomes). - The 10-acre Tonka V entures PRD site The 2.25 acre Sohns property and the 2.2 acre Larson property - The 3/4 acre single family residence site west if the truck station driveway - The 5 acres at Cabman Street and County Road 15 containing 4 single family homes; the east half of this area is attached to the developed single family properties south ofthelagcv;- The 3 aertj ;.<*w.-cn the marinas on North Shore Drive containing 4 existing homes, with a sir jjto >iy residence and a duplex expvicted to be built in 1999. Zoning Amendment: LR>1C-1 Density Credit February 10,1999 Pages Impact of the 50% Density Credit The LR-lC-1 density credit simply allows "a 50% increase in dwelling unit density over the LR-IC District”. The LR-IC District requires a minimum lot size of 1/2 acre, which translate to a n^iXfimim dwelling unit density of 2 units per acre. A 50% increase in density yields 3 umts per acre. This credit is the sole basis for the LR-lC-l District. Opportunities for Housing Variety Along Highway 12 The number of multi-family dwelling units that might be developed or redeveloped in the existing LR-lC-1 zones under the current code (excluding the Tonka Ventures property which will provide 29 townhouse units) is likely less than 20. However, the City has provided for significant numbers of multi-family dweUing units in its Highway 12 Corridor along the north side of Highway 12 between Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road. The 1988 Comprehensive Plan ^endment No. 2 contemplates (and provides for) from 50 to perhaps 250 units of townhomes ^^8 dweloped at up to 6-8 units per acre. This area of Orono does not suffer from the existing high-density problems of traffic, stormwater management, etc. that are found in Navarre. Development at higher densities in the Highway 12 corridor can be accomplished in a manner that addresses all related concerns, rather than adding to them as it would in Navarre. Retain LR-lC-1 PRD Attached-Unit Capability? An alternative to total elimination of the LR-lC-1 district is to retain the ability to use a PRD to enable clustering and attached units. That is, allow up to 4 attached umts via a PRD, at the underlying district density. This would retain the ability to have a variety of housing (single family, twinhomes, quads) under "conditions" (A thru H). Summary Elimination of the 50% credit without retaining the ability for attached units, would functionally remove any distinguishing characteristics between the LR-IC and LR-lC-1 Di^cts. In this case, it would be most appropriate to eliminate the LR-1C-1 designation from the zoning code, and rezone all LR-lC-1 properties to LR-IC. Retention of the ability in LR-1 C-1 to create attached dwelling units would enable clustering and the preservation of trees and green space that is not possible in the LR-IC zone. To this end, staff has drafted 2 options for amending the LR-lC-1 District for discussion and recommendation (Exhibits A). To: City ot Orono Trom: Kark 4 Karon Cu£f Q (412) 471-9795 02/03/99 29:13:38 1 Of 1 LR-IC tes to a nits per ndsting provide umbers way 12 lent No. oped at density t higher related PRD to , at the family, ionally is case, rezone Feb. S, 1999 City of Orono 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono, MN 55356 • • Dear Council Members, This is in response to the memo that I received about a public hearing notice in reference to the propped revision to tlie Orono Zoning Code Section 10.26, subdivision 3 regarding the LR-lC-1 One Famil)- Lakeshore Residential Subdistrict. I will not be able to attend this public hearing on Feb. 16tli. ^no should reverse the decrease in dwelling unit density tliat it had previously passed. I Ii\e in tlic Navarre area and most all of the lots are between 50 to 100 feet in widtk This area has a problem with 1 er and drainage due to the amount of homes, garages, dri vewa>”s, decks and other structures on each property. This is something that I would not want to happen in other areas around the lake. It’s much less e.vpensive for all involved to prevent the situation before it happens than after the fact. 9 • Another fabtor in tliis is having your neiglibors too close to each other. You don't feel tliat you can entert^n company in the wann montlw outside with out up-setting your neiglibors. Tlie additional noise from talking, children playing, and lack of additional parking for guests does annoy neighbors. Ifow many of these area have adequate space for well water and septic? Would additional hard cover etfect the erosion of property and cause additional pollution of the lake? If people fee* t’at they have 1^ part of their investment because they can not sub-divide in the future, they should liave purchased tann land away from the lake area > ears ago. That's where the high den.sitv land developments belong, not in the lake area. \\ ith this being Tlie Lake Minnetonka .Area" it should remain a suburban setting, not something that s turned into an area like Pl>inouth. I hope this has helped in your decision to keep our communitv in the setting that this area has been known for in the years gone by, " Large Open Spaces" for > oiir family to grow up in. Sincerelv. on and Karen Cuft' 3572 Livingstoii .Ave Orono. MN 55391 471-9795 February 8,1999 I_______ • VCD 0 O * Oifi'C. Orono Planning Commission 2780 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Re: Public Hearing February 16,1999 Dear Planmng Commission: Thb letter is to show support for the proposed revision to the Orono Zoning Code Section 10^6, Suhdivion 3 regarding the LR-lC-1 One Family Lakeshore Residential Subdbtrict. I live at 3625 Lyric Avenue and there b a proposed development in the Langdon area (one block west of the Dairy Queen) that I strongly oppose. Shoreline Drive is far too busy and cannot support the additional traffic. The only peace from the constant traffic noise and view comes from the small area of woods diat is the proposed development. To redirect the additional traffic this would create into the residential Navarro area would totally change the complexion of the neighborhood. I missed the public hearing on thb development, but have attempted to talk to the City of Orono twice on my concerns, but no one has returned my phone calb. Please save my neighborhood from over development. Very truly yours. Kathleen L. Fine 471-7970 ; I I I • a « t < K. X S|,j m mw I |M| i».«r«rart »-i t f«M J »• |ilr> • J|W • •• •^ •%ti0 llUliMi M «t -------^------5 im 4V»r~' n CrJt** ■5' ^ii^USS---- 25WAVE DAKOTA SilgfejilEiiSI *p^p[p*2mp*s*x^ if#*iR3 N p KS»»#H**n** ■♦I rTl# I I I . I ^ I.■iiljflXI jMf ■5H0IWtlNEJ>-««■ i^-iSI » ^!3aTi i '•’ ifi t ■u^uuaVHErrwci.'Bi: A__________H^^^I■l■I^UL^% «MMEA1IC* «» ■wwi‘<*ICSAtH >lii 1 ^7 wmM \\>j tie-ic-i bisTieicTS mVi \1\ * (T maxwell -Tv 1 ''7 F'2. , - aci PISTI^ICT •- -I II <Vj(|0) (13)(12>.(10) >4a.«vCi L.y 9 mCiJijs Am 32X3 •••••••••••••••• (10) 11)1*A CL I k I 4U.'13k 05)r\x»1.4 too \ na MH • <1^ 304.93 /« nhDU- 174 •« 9n.9T « 1 19* •».A-w.v •40*11--------------------^SLUOL------------------------------^ —./ -9 ®* TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:March 8,1999 SUBJECT: #2444 Brian and Susan Schebler 1354 Rest Point Circle After-the-Fact Variance-Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area:31,200 square feet (.72 acre) Application: The applicants are requesting an after-the-fact variance to permit a detached, ground level deck located on the lakeside of the residence. The deck is located behind ti»v5 75' lakeshore setback. The actual distance from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of Lake Minnetonka to the deck is 86'. The deck is 12' by 16' and is located further back on the lot than the neighboring house to the east. The neighboring house to the west is located further back from the lake, but would not be impacted due to the applicant's home screening the deck from that property. A large addition to the home was constructed in 1989. Approval was subject to previous property owners removing a gravel parking area on the property and reducing tb? s’ <e of the driveway. As of the date of the most recent survey, and a site inspection on Febru;try 25, 1999, it h^ been determined the hardcover has not been removed. Staff could support retaining the existing driveway for maintenance and public safety and allowing the gravel parking area to remain. The applicant s have stated the gravel parking area is used for snow storage by the City. Additional hardcover on the lot includes areas of rock. No plastic or fabric is under the rock preventing water from infiltrating into the ground. The applicants have stated they have removed much of the hardcover, but the rock located in the area around the driveway is to prevent erosion as the lot is sloped and much of the drainage in the locality is over their property. The rock on the lakeside of the home (all outside of the 75' setback) is located in an area that does not receive any sunlight, preventing grass from growing in tiiat area. U7444 Brian and Susan Schebler 1334 Rest Point Circle 4^er-the-Fact Varkmce 3/13/99 Page 1 Thu application requires the following after-the-fact variance: 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2); To allow 9,063 s.f. (48.47%) of hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback, where 9,063 s.f. (48.47%) exists and 4,675 s.f. (25%) is allowed. ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IB (1 acre) Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Lakeshore Required 43,560 s.f.140 ’35 ’10’75 ’ Proposed |1 31,200 s.f.121’NA 26’86’ The deck is located within all required setbacks on the property. Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0-75 ’9,250 s.f.435 s.f. (4.7%) none (0%) 435 s.f. (4.7%) none 75-250’18,700 s.f.9,063 s.f. (48.47%) 4,675 s.f. (25%) 9,063 s.f. (48.47%) The deck is 195 s.f. of the calculated hardcover. 250-500’3,250 s.f.409 s.f. (12.58%) 975 s.f. (30%) 409 s.f. (12.58%) none 500-1000’0 0 0 (35%) • 0 none U2 and Susan Schebler 1354 Ri\t Point CircU 4ftir-tk*-Fact VarlatKe 5/15/99 Pau^l A i 4 \ Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 31,200 s.f.Existing: 3,821 s.f.12.2% The property is allowed 4,680 s.f. of structure. Decks are not considered structure unless they exceed 6' above grade. The subject deck is not structure. Variance STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant's have included their statement of hardship as Exhibit B. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues 1.A building plan was approved for an addition to the residence in 19S9 by previous propt -ty owners. Some hardcover that was required to be removed remains on the property. 2.Would variances be granted on the deck if the applicants had appeared before the Planning Commission prior to construction? 3. 4. 5. The deck is located behind the 75' lakeshore setback (86' from the OHWL). The applicants have stated the gravel parking area is used for snow storage by the City. The lot is located on a comer of Rest Point Circle. The road is only platted 12' wide at the most narrow point. Requirements of the subdivision code would plat this road much wider providing space for plowed snow to be stored. 6.Erosion on the property is controlled by rock along drainage areas. The rock is an asset to the property. $2444 Brian and Susan SchebUr 1254 Rest Point Circle After-the-Fact Variance 3/15/99 Page 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of an after-the-fact variance to permit the 12' by 16' detached deck based on the following hardships: 1. 2. 3. Much of the existing hardcover on the property could be removed, however the rock is not underlain by any impervious materials. Also the rock located around the driveway protects this portion of the property from erosion as much of the drainage in the locality follows the slope. Planting grass would create a maintenance problem as a steep slope exists. The rock on the lakeside of the home (all outside of the 75' setback) is located in an area that does not receive any sunlight, preventing grass from growing in that area. The gravel paricing area located on the north part of the property benefits the locality as it is used for parking by the home owners and provides an area for snow storage. The applicants have stated plowed .snow is stored on their property. Rest Point Circle is a narrowly platted road and no storage area is available along the side of the street. Attachments A B C D E F G H I J Application Description of Request and Statement of Hardship Site Plan/Survey 1989 Site Plan Plat Map Location Map Hardcover Worksheets Deck Drawings/Plan Property Owners List Permit Record U2444 Brian and Susan SchebUr IS34 Rist Point Circle 4fter•the^Facl Variance 3/13/99 FageA Application it d? ^^9 • • Date Received V/ : * ^*• •Vi:Amount Paid. •PLICATIONCTTY OF ORONO - VARIANC] .Initial Ajpplicadon Fe^ $250.00 .($50.00 per each ad( Renewal .Variance Fee .$150.00.. . . (no change &om original application) Variance for non-confonning structures ' $250.00 . After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION t , u Site Address' TirLT 6S3^ Property Identification Number 0^i.D.) _ _ — _ _ ^ ^ AAttach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acomred 9/97 1 _____^-----------------------^(month/year) ' I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X residential other (^city)-------------------------------- ZoningDistrict:_ B J APPLICAOT • S . * CutName er Addre^: /JT*/ Riit CircU Phone (home") V7J -OtO^ _ ' Phonerwoikl' /■* 776/ ritv! 0/4f49 Zip: S^(»y_ M OWNER (if different than applicjmt) . . ' Name ________ Phone (home). Phone (work)_ Address:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST City:Zip:. Estimated Construction Cost $ SlXi Describe request in detail: AtJsMicAgx d />f9 ^Ai/a.d4.0 /I y/4—dSsA — i — . ii... Af' *..j. .t —Af/.--------------------. , ^;h anditional sheets if necessary) n/ h Jot/ Area ■ Lot Vidth' . ' JL Hardcover , '.-----Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear ,X- Average Lakeshore .* • . k Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDHIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventmg • compliance with Zoning Code requirements: /IfcouiL ^ oA Ate ort. m—jAifL—------ g-r /i/ M mA. ^ (9/ j/y^ additional sheets if necessary) /* St, /o u/ fyj /nr _Of—OA/U4u/x.—PAoptr^ty. Cd^^/na^s- St.^/uKCt/'—.-./.99-T^.-----^A-—- AlA..^arcAxi^jcA—_ -—/pLaA^j^/HCj—-/Xc. d/luAs—.-Y—jfa-tOAf.-y^jf/'.cA—MAir. -—fl,—/\ttiudLsf^.t^eitiL,_________________________________________ r f - — —-------- ^ \—H^d^cJCLKfhJ._Afi__A clvc ^a __Qy‘e.€L.../dr... Our—^jnhA ---/uA^tfu^t---dAjet-_dAcZC._CiAJ-..Ao — fA.tO*i-AhA^~f/.i€cJS ---flO----- A a A<l i.tCCtuu~t^. —Av^oyrap^ - - Cdf^-— A —.€AtshA>^—df^cO-Ctic-^ iAj-.ytciAdKd'Ot*. %/oC h —p/tiC-i.—s—jC/m,CL —,(y4_Ljc/6-i—dtcAi.——p7\*,—jouP^ ——Y—rcA,---------------------------------^ ___±-A —/ncE—Co/krfec^A:,d — . ,—YA- yj—-------- A>—Ssr——An^^Af__A*_p/'AUA.ef—.AA .—pQ0j4t^c^^ ...o*t^^-—----------- j—Jp.Md£—6jLdA£.</\—cttcktAC^-./o —e/uciAc • /a/x -C/ea/^ ~.---pt>SStf/—a . —A—Ak- • ootf ■ -it.Atc P^.------------------------------- .i----—/$C*—a —^—Pyccu---------------------------------^$u.- j—.^l6Ctyy\t.A^—tO—-- /vtt,^^6*fAooef- - /X*.—c/*.cX ----P.9/1---tMt/A * A— A 0a \.*~J-----A a -■-—hk/ty/^ I . J.Z. Pa ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ . ^JT .a aO^----//---jiA—/uP~^KA.---AdcJi- -/5u---Ctk/iK,----/5f<lA.-! JJUt_/^j^.yAipr.j___________Af .._.CTaj/"-^---- 8 I X -u i- ------------------------------------^-----------------------— ---------------------------------------------------— *__//pP__^/ArA t//cW^ __p.C^pU^^jP?!- ../A a ^ ______—----- - <vt =*>4^ o^oNo coey Certificate of Survey for C.J. Wallin Hooetiuliders of Lot 13. Rest Point Park and Lot II. Subdivision of Lot 14. Rest Point Park Hennepin County. Minnesota AS SHOMtJ A’Sk f^eKjczzPtfiyi 'TP mAAxnrAit^ Dca/a/a^c t\OUSe Mint zoo Aht^TL tW2A/fUACi£ TO Fitop&zr/ei (Ai'hO House ^ w o-f3 75-i50 >250 £«/iAz^ffOC^Sf/i £««vAIfy M4Si9fA f4S$i9f/i 1 01 •khtuka^/.99X>7.37%0 £58»A 0 //C. <! yyj.i'f ' f-UiL- S cHn>vt<-^; *>r'«o ^zt/,rYu (lt€t\j\ove ofi~oy^\T ircr^s IK, Blue) iejet ZPZ /•a/ *}, ^ ClTVOFflRONO X SITE PUN _A GP.A0ING PLAN iJAPPaOVED Xapppoveo with nsvis’iUMS <5^H lAKt MiM/^£rCA/^A I hereby certify that this is a true and •SUOOIVISION Cf L and the location or encroachments. rrect representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot II, MINNETONKA* and Lot 13, *Rest Point Park Hennepin Co., Minn." d c)•SUOOIVISION Cf LOT U k£ST POINT PARK LA« *** exist by 1 IdIngj;thereon. It does not purport to show any other Improvements COFFIN I GRQ/6ERG. INC. V i • 1_ * r” . —-----------------I_________Mark 5. b-onec^r^ Hn, ticT «. iZTSS LAKESHORE G Htn""ncSr^°^'’ "“T"c 0 : Iron marker (9gAt} : Spot elevation Datum: Mean Sea Level M •- -f.r -A• V*. RE.GULATiO:'.’ H OnONO OPiO:f'.n\-t; .. ••. EXCAVATION. .'■I'.l!.' • t. DliFOnii'JG, Tiv. ••» c.'iirjrnurit;.!. . wn I'N 75 rr o: /.nv r .. _VW*Hif; Of- A. V • t /, y 1:> I ’•V/V/ • • ; a* I • •J /;:• “a i -oir V: .^ • . t •* t F*i riA.a*rn ^*>41' • # I e % 0. '■^-JS4.n...... • • (53) W '^' I •i\ (30)-"S' tk'^yWX '2 \ T/\AK :' \Xi A () \^j/S%n W- •• \ (jA r\ \ / /^ -i \\r %«.;•••■•: ^ \ • • •• L* • • 17 '' i \*^•' N I \rO ( 3 '' A4' \oj \A9-on<v V <4 5^7) '" 'p^ di h7-^-3 s3 ■5^• • ^(18) L^,i^. '''O (17) (1 /<• • >V\ >-:^A \ 1/ Vm^ \ \ (24J .^(23)\\K \> VAC DOC NO 3309 S ^ \< ■■"• tOi ^-7. //7^3 jA c-a. -tc* '. •. ;• ‘ . .* l'^.> '- ^ : j-: £i- • -S .i Z,\w ^ v{s/if ^cuaSLe^K^sr HAIUJCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE)75-250’250-500’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X Length WidUj X X X B. Gofage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk S 2Z X X 7x/ /-9 4^ E. PaHo/Peck X X 2^4 VlALUi • Landscape _ Underlain By Plastic a.3 Z4-' a.5 X X X /<? 2 £•4-7 91L G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A B 9t5o 43£ X 100 *97.30 4'^'7 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Length Width X X X B. Gaiage C. Driveway X X D.. Sidewalk. .X X E. Pado/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X 8 B G. Other TOTAL HARDCO\ l.R IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A -i- B X ICO 500-1000’ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B A B Mate //>eM HARDCOVER CALCULAliU.N ^ 'Po/f^r 'Rfta/i SETBACK ZONE! (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* CtS-1S(Q 250.500* 500.1000' •• •*. •• urXISTlNC. HARnrOVER IN 7.0NP A. House ••'•VAW ' ...Lcn|th WWlh • • •* m • • •• A/^. X X X ,B. Carafe .■•■. . ■ ■ ••-•.I.* C. Driveway D. «{<iewalk ”E. •pa(io7Dcck 9<? V.* • *v. •F. Lindscape S floc,>c p7' “ ’^o<J«7UIn A/. ge>^id •■• v;-By Plasvlc g. , a^o ^jc /87 X X X X X X • X X X X - t \ 0-7 a.s 3Z. fZ.Z a, 4. ..v.^...-.u.. total hardcover in zone . ..I9XAL. PROPERTY. AREA IN ZONEV.J* ^ «v.** fLo&a.i;C. ■' ^•V?.' A "■ ' PPOPOSED HaRDCOVRR IN 7.qh^ , . House _____________ • ..&»V • . ..y.v- -!• B /S70e:> x 100 = Width i". B. T» * c. •* ^ Oarage \ • • Driveway X X X •f D. • Sidewalk UK- E. Patio/Deck ....VwdjPipe. Uaderlain By Traitlc Olber *\<.V f.r • *• m* X X X X X • X X X X m•33Z)S.F. *•• 72 S.F. s:;^2Z S.F. Zi •S.F. «s 4'7 S.F. V S33 S.F. s:ec>S.F. S3 • 65 S.F. =________ _____________ S.F. 78 =S.F. m S.F. 38 a //55 S.F. IRIU S.F. »'4-6^S.F. 7S • • • • *S.F. ••9 04^S.F. •f&7t9G S.F. =S % 0 • S.F. 8 •S.F. «S.F. a . t.S.F. S.F. -S.F. S3 S3 SS 13 9 • • • •'W.-*• • ■a s ■ • «*» • . — y.v • A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - _________ B-X too S.F. S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 9i deck. •A" • B A B . • • • • . * • i 'Ae/fi • * % K ’ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WOKKSHLt: r SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ 75-250’ QSOJQ^ '^esr /i. 500-1000’ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _____________ • ••••• «Lcnsth Width .> t * X X X B. Cange .. • • • • « • C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio7Dcck X X F. Landscape Underiain By Plastic • • X X X G. Other 3%- -o.-y * • • • •• ••TOTAL hardcover IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B • • «• m X 100 = PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN 7.nNF. A. House • ------Lcnfih Width X X X B. Oarage * • • C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk • • X X E. Patio/Deck X X Landscape Underlain - • By Tlasttc X X X 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B-X too •a S.F. • • • • • •. S.E. s S.F. XX S.F. xs S.F. XX 3/S.F. s S.F. XX # S.F. 8S S.F. ss • S.F. a S.F. 3^/S.F. ts S.F. »S.F. .27 S.F. m S.F. 9 S.F. SS /3,S3,% O • S.F. S.F. s S.F. s S.F. 8 S.F. S.F. 8 S.F. S.F. 8 S.F. 8 S.F. 8 S.F.• • S.F. S.F. o ****•• •S.F. 8 S.F. •S.F. •S.F. 8 % « • A B A B J xSo»f-Ke*t- t£ » ------?—------------— ic% A A., 4"l.-3 m i o.ACtA1 } r-.-r -T*— —- ^9 • * • •• . /.— — I.. rnr^pT* »•• • *«»•• • ••• • •• «• # 2v^ RUN DATE 12/99/9$HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST • REPORT NO. PZ4S5401 PACE 17 BATCH 59S PROP ADOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 58 07>117~23 SI 981$ 91S97 REST POINT CIR H E PXNEOAR 8 R A PZNEOAR HIUIAH I REBECCA PXNEOAR 1S47 REST POINT CIR HOUND HN 55S$4 58 97>117-25 51 9922 81592 REST POINT CIR N J ALTENHOFEN ET AL NARK J ALTENHOFEN 1592 REST POINT CIR HOUND NN 55569 58 07>117-25 51 9925 91598 REST POINT CIR K 8 D HANKXNSON KEITH 0 8 DONNA N HANKINSON 1598 REST POINT CIR HOUND HN 55569 *. • PROP Al OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 97*117-25 51 9929 91559 REST POINT CIR RICHARD L ANFINSON RICHARD L ANFINSON 1559 REST POINT CIR HOUND HN 55569 58 97-117-2S 52 9959 81519 REST POINT U E D 8 C L REINHART ERIC D REINHART 1519 REST POINT U HOUND HN 55569 58 97-117-25 52 9951 . 91569 REST POINT CIR D 8 J BOIES JR DAVID B 8 JENNIFER BOIES JR 1569 REST POINT CIRCLE . HOUND HN 55569 • PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 58 97-117-25 52 9959 91565 REST POINT RD THONAS NICHOLAS BERSCNEID THOHAS NICHOLAS BERSCHEIO 1565 REST POINT RD HOUND HN 55569 58 97-117-25 52 8969 91566 REST POINT RD LAWRENCE E 8 HELEN LANCHANS LAWRENCE E 8 HELEN LANCHANS 1566 REST POINT RD HOUND HN 55569 58 97-117-25 52 9961 91571 REST POINT LA KENNETH W 8 RENEE 0 ECGERT KENNETH W 8 RENEE 0 ECGERT 1571 REST POINT U HOUND HN 55569 PROP ADOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 58 97-117-25 52 9962 91559 REST POINT CIR B A SCHEBLER 8 S B SCHEBLER B A SCHEBLER 8 S B SCHEBLER 1559 REST POINT CIR HOUND NN 55569 58 97-117-25 55 9912 91579 REST POINT RD 0 R BLOOH 8 T A BLOOH GEORGE R 8 THERESA A BLOOH 1579 REST POINT RD HOUrat NN 55569 TOTAL BATCH 595 999U I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEOOE AND BELIEF. DA V>'i\V n /o^'7tr' /3s-V4^ t Permit No. 1107 PERMIT RECORD Date 1 Type of Permit 6*^ fc-/-tfo/. sffen S3.7 • '7-72-65-A^C a JAC»^ fit<.Jt1)o•HOOK OP ------------->ti-0—’ 4I3-.ID, HQ /ihd^d,J) ^Ql LL /1U~^ c3 _________-X^C lu 4A>^ ot'iU /o '30' ?9 /-•53. Q7 lihlrho P./.j!r> 7'^ca6 II-/ v-^.r U.V jam rAvi-Mi • • TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:February 25,1999 SUBJECT: #2461 Chris Pierson on behalf of Biyson/Johnson 650-660-670-680 Big Island Lot Line Rearrangement-Public Hearing Zoning District:Seasonal Recreational (5 Acre) Lot Area:55,215 square feet (1.26 acre) Application: The applicant has proposed a lot line rearrangement and lot combination for lots located at 650-660-670-680 Big Island. The lots are currently 3 separate seasonal residences on four tax parcels that are to be combined into 2 parcels. Esifttiiig Address Legal Description 650 Big Island 660 Big Island Lots 7-8, Pleasant View (seasonal dwelling) Lots 5-6, Pleasant View (seasonal dwelling) ♦ dwelling to be removed prior to filing subdivision 670 Big Island 680 Big Island Lot 4, Pleasant View (seasonal dwelling) Lot 3, Pleasant View Propoaid Address Legal Description 650 Big Island 670 Big Island Lots 6-7-8, Pleasant View (seasonal dwelling) Lots 3-4-5, Pleasant View (seasonal dwelling) IH46I Christopher J. Pierson 650-660-670. 80 Big Island Lot Line Rearrangement 3/17/99 Page I . r-^>fi-r- rr-iTii-it iiriii~ • i n'iifiT n ^ ^ . ANALYSIS 650 Big Island (Lots 7 and 8, Pleasant View) has been legally combined into one tax parcel. The lot contains one seasonal dwelling that would remain upon completion of the proposed subdivision. With the addition of Lot 6 the property would increase to 28,186 s.f from 19,074 s.f. The total frontage on the lakeshore would also increase from 100' to 150'. The lot does contain a non-conforming septic system due to the system being located within 3* of the water table. However, lot line rearrangements do not require conforming sites as conditions will improve as the site will grow larger, and the number of residential units in the area will decrease. The septic tank and well for this property is located across the existing property line on the 670 Big Island property (Lot 6) Mliich is proposed to be included with Lots 7 and 8 to create the larger parcel. Lot Area and Yards RS 5 acre Lot Area Lot Width Side Yard Rear Yard Lakeside Yard Existing 19,074 s.f.101'12.11'45'63 ’ Proposed 28,186 s.f.151'60'45'63' The cabin does encroach into the 75' lakeshore setback. The lot would have an adequate building site outside of the 75* setback should a new cabin ever be constructed on the lot. The lot combination would place the septic tank and well on the same tax parcel. Currently, they are located on the adjacent lot. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 19,074 s.f.2,453.5 s.f.12.8% 28,186 s.f.2,533.5 s.f.8.9% The lot would not exceed the allowed lot coverage of 15%. §2461 Chrlsiophir J. Pierson 650^60^70^630 Big island La Line Rearrangement 5/i 7/99 Page! 0 HardcoverLocation Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed HardcoverLots 7-8 0-75'8,381 s.f.1,468.4 s.f. (17.5%) none (0%) Lots 7-8 75-250'10,693 s.f.2,245.7 s.f. (21.0%) 2,673.25 s.f. (25%) Lots 7-8-9 0-75’12,241 s.f.1,505.5 s.f. (12.3%) none (0%) Lots 7-8-9 75-250'15,945 s.f.2,326.4 s.f. (14.6%) 3,986.25 s.f. (25%) The existing hardcover in the 0-75* lakeshore setback is mostly a deck located on the lakeshore. The deck does encroach over the property line to Lot 6. The lot combination would place the entire deck on the same property. they 670 and 680 Big Island (Lots 3 and 4, Pleasant S^iew) are not combined. The properties do serve as one common lot, and are imder common ownership. The cabin is located on Lot 4 with a shed and deck/patio areas. A portion of an existing deck located at the shore of Lake Minnetonka does encroach over the lot line to Lot 3 (680 Big Island). Lot 3 is not developed and contains the septic system for the two adjacent lots to the south. Easements have been created across Lots 3 and 4 to Lots 5 and 6 for access to the septic site. These easements would be vacated when Lots 5 and 6 are split. The cabin on Lot 5 will be removed prior to the filing of the subdivision. At that time the septic lines will be capped and only the single cabin will have access. A lot line rearrangement will place the entire septic system on one tax parcel, eliminating the need for easements and maintenance agreements. Lot Area and Yards RS 5 acre Lot Area Lot Width Side Yard Rear Yard Lakeside Yard Existing 18,179 s.f 98’11.95 ’116 ’26 ’ Proposed 27,029 s.f 149 ’60’116 ’26 ’ U246I Chrisiopher J. Pierson 65M6M7(M80 Big Island Lot Line Rearrangement 3/17/99 Page 3 > ’1- jLu.- ± I The setbacks shown above assumes the removal of the cabin and shed on Lot 5. Which are both located in the side yard setback. The Code does not allow two dwellings on one lot under 5 acresin the RS Zoning District.Structural CoverageTotal Lot Size 18,179 s.f 27,029 s.f. Total Structural Coverage 1776.2 s.f. 2,871.6 s.f. 1776.2 s.f. assumes removal of cabin Percentage 9.7% 10.6% 6.5% The lot would not exceed the allowed lot coverage of 15%. Hardcover Location Lots 3-4 Lots 3-4 Lots 3-4-5 Lots 3-4-5 Distance from Shoreline 0-75’ 75-250 ’ Total Area in Setback 7,372 s.f. 10,808 s.f. 0-75’ 75-250' 10,905.8 s.f. 16,123.2 s.f. Existing Hardcover 1,819.4 s.f. (24.6%) 324.3 s.f. (3.0%) 2,875.2 s.f. (26.4%) 632 s.f. (3.9%) Allowed Hardcover none (0%) 2,702 s.f. (25%) none (0%) 4,030.8 s.f. (25%) The hardcover in the 0-75 ’ setback is due largely to the cabin that will remain on the property. Nearly the entire cabin is located within the 75 ’ setback. §246! ChrltlophtrJ. PUrson 6S0-66M70-U0 Big Island Lot Lint Baamngfmna 3/17/99 Pagt4 660 Big Island (Lots 5 and 6) will go away as a result of the lot line rearrangement. The property would be split leaving Lot 5 to join Lots 3 and 4, and Lot 6 to join Lots 7 and 8. The cabin is the primaiy issue of concern to Staff. Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (B) states the following regarding a private guest cabin on a lot:A conditional use permit may be issued for one or more private guest cabins provided the applicant demonstrates and the Council finds that the additional living or sleeping facilities will not contribute to overcrowding or overuse of a small property, will not adversely ^ect neighboring properties, and that extra private precautions are taken for fire protection and security of persons and property, as follows: 1. Private guest cabins shall be used solely by the occupants of the seasonal or principal dwelling, including their domestic employees, caretakers or non-paying guests. Private guest cabins shall not be rented or leased for compensation. 2. The minimum drv huildable record lot area required for approval of a private guest cabin conditional use permit without a variance shall be 5.0 acres. Approval of a private guest cabin conditional use permit on an existing record lot of less than 5.0 acres shall be subject to strict showing of compliance with health and sanitation performance standards. 3. The guest cabin(s) and the seasonal or principal dwelling shall all be connected to on-site sewage treatment system(s) in conformance with the requirements of Subdivision 12 of this Section. (Subdivision 12 states within the RS Zoning District all dwellings shall be connected to an on-site sewage treatment system to City Standards) 4. The guest cabin(s) and the seasonal or principal dwelling shall all be equipped with approved smoke detection devices and with some form of manual or automatic fire extinguishing equipment. 5. All property in common ownership shall be combined into one tax parcel if contiguous; or if separated by public rights-of-way, a special lot combination form shall be executed and filed in the chain of title of each separate parcel. 6. Not more than one private guest cabin constructed without indoor plumbing, toilets or kitchen facilities, and used only for additional sleeping quarters, shall be permitted on any property as an accessory use without requiring a conditional use permit, provided the accessory cabin does not exceed 600 square feet in floor area and provided all accessory building performance standards are met. Use of more than one accessory building for additional sleeping quarters, or use of an accessory building in excess of 600 square feet in floor area, shall require issuance of a conditional use permit. 02461 Christophtr J. Pierson 650-660.670-6SO Big Island Lot Line Rearrangtmnl J/17/99 Pages Fire Code IssuesThe City docs not allow structures to be located this close to a property line without meeting strict fire code standards. It is recommended by Staff the cabin on Lot 5 be removed prior to the City filing the Subdivision with Hennepin County. Both the cabin and shed are located well within the required 30* side yard setback.Setbacks as determined in the RS Zoning District for internal and rear property lines:Lot width 200 feet or greater - 50 feet 100 feet, but less than 200 ~ 30 feet less than 100 feet — 10 feet Items for discussion 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Section 10.31, Subdivision 6 (C) (1) states lot line rearrangements between abutting properties that do not create an ad^tional building site will normally be approved. The rearrangement will place two cabins on one lot. The Code does not allow more than one cabin on a lot without granting variances and a conditional use permit. The 670 Big Island property shares a septic system with the adjacent cabin that would be removed. All easements and agreements would be vacated at that time. The well and septic for the 650 Big Island property are located on another property that would be combined with 650. The entire septic and well would now be on one lot. The cabin on Lot 5 would be located approximately 1.5 feet from the lot line. Staff is recommending removal of the cabin. The applicant has stated his intent is to remove the cabin. 6. Any drainage and utility easements that are located along the interior lot lines should be vacated. The City would require drainage and utility easements 5' along interior lot lines and 10' along the rear lot lines. §2461 Christopher J. Pierson 650^6M70^6Q Big Island Lot Une Rearrangement 3/17/99 Page 6 i\STAFF RECOMMENDATIONStaff is recommending approval ot tnc lot line rearrangement to create two parcels (Lots 3-4- 5, Pleasant View and Lots 6-7-8, Pleasant View) subject to the following conditions:1. The existing cabin at 660 Big Island be removed along with the deck and stairwayto include sidewalks and removal of the shed within the side yard setback of 30 feet.TWs being completed prior to the filing of the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement with Hennepin County.2. All existing easements for septic and well use across other properties be vacated. 3. Drainage and utility easements granted to the City 5’ along interior property lines and 10' along the rear property lines. 4.A Title Opinion shall be completed, and a copy provided to the City, prior to filing the subdivision. Attachments Application Plat Map Big Island Map Survey Site Plan Site Topography Septic System Easement and Maintenance Agreement for 660 and 670 Big Island Lot 3-8 Ownership Property Owners List Permit Record - 660 Big Island Permit Record - 670 Big Island Hardcover Worksheets H246I ChrUtopher J. Pierson 63(Pm-670^0 Big Island Lot Line Rearrangement 3/J7/99 Page! innr« HiT^ •mutniT^ Ria: ’KITCHEIL'S SUSIDH; COVERWHT LOTS S Id SEeTIOim 22 TO! 7 RAdSE 23" 'KIWSSL 'S SUSff 0. 'lOmH^UT LOTS 0 ’o sscrm ss hmisisiP (• e a SNIDER'S SUBDIVISION OF LOT »mCAlCACH HUNTiNCTONroirrr >• * i^-K4JiGAArrscHirrtL— MCKIATIOrfPOirfT w-A*TH0» AIXBI WMure TM-MOMELIffWOl' Its-anSVL RAHfTAD RVASS. m^AOltSTnUDBII' mm. wnxuM mYtoN «it*ltTTVr.FHPIC>- M*CLifroi« nniDtoR • CM-itffmiYFUIfON 340ai0.niSDABIUJHrJiN —. <<»*EUOOIBA.NiXJOH. - v •TSDILKANKA-• - s» * -IM • HUOara* CMiNTY rARKS Ut.JOKNaUIUN l«-TNOMASTAVLCtt IS*>WM.UUIMAMC t(••D«AI«t■t8l«l«0 ■ Ji «nt-JOttPHIACKkS laO.OtlAtDI.WAlJH -----m-tTMfmUrCAMA IAMBS OQLAMD Sit-JACK *UAMAff M-MML FRIO KALIS M-OAVDSAAH Sit* FRIO W. KALIS Stt.ROBERTrOSIHUMUS Mm V •«* V 8 ViniANICAM. HACK BIG ISLAND LANDOWNERS JULY L1997 KEY: m ISi MriiiMMii K \ MINN E-TONKA \\ \ CLEV.-928.30 yl 2-01-98 ------------- \ . 150.03 (MEAS) 9 CO no /ni A tN (^,70 150.03 (MEAS) (o50 j 50.00 (PLAT) 49.92 (MEAS) i I *" #t 8 J • • • (j>nojicdo I (p(»0. loS 0 * •• \ . V / SEPTIC SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION, EASEKH^T AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, nade as of this day of KvifeiViST, 1995, by and between Elized)eth Foster Prince, a widow not remarried (hereinafter called "Prince") and William E. Bryson II and Thelma L. Bryson, husband and wife (hereinafter called the "Brysons") WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Prince is the owner of certain property located on Big Island, Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as lAts 5 and 6, Pleasant View, Lake Minnetonka (hereinafter called the "Prince Parcel); and WHEREAS, The Brysons are owners of certain adjacent property legally described as Lots 3 and 4, Pleasant View, Lake Minnetonka (hereinafter called the "Bryson Parcel); and e WHEREAS, the City of Orono is recpiiring the installation of an approved septic system to serve each property; and the parties hereto understand that the City of Orono will approve and authorize the construction and maintenance of a single septic system to serve the Prince Parcel and the Bryson Parcel; and 5, elma ) srty WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to enter into an agreement with respect to the construction, installation and maintenance ofa single septic system to serve both the Prince Parcel and the Bryson Parcel; NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of the premises, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The parties agree to construct and install a septic system to serve both the Prince Parcel and the Bryson Parcel, the drainfield of which septic system will be located on the Bryson’ Parcel and connect by supply line to a pumping cheunber and tanks located on the Prince Parcel and further connecting by pipe lines to the respective dwellings on the Prince Parcel and the Bryson Parcel, all as shown on the design drawing attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 2• The parties shall mutually agree upon a licensed septic contractor to construct and install such septic system, and shall share equally in the cost thereof, and all associated costs, including septic permit and attorney fees in connection with this agreement. 3* The parties agree to cooperate fully with the septic contractor, and to allow said septic contractor access to and across their respective properties in connection with said septic system construction and installation. 1T. 4. The palsies agree to share equally in the cost of all maintenance and repairs to such septic system, subsequent to its construction and installation. If either party incurs costs in the maintenance and repair of such septic system, said party shall notify the other party thereof in writing, and the other party shall pay its one-half share of such costs within thirty (30) days of such written notice. 5. Each of the parties hereto hereby grants to the other party a nonexclusive easement for the use, maintenance and repair of the septic system, including drainfield, supply lines, pumping chamber and tanks, and connecting pipe lines to the parties' respective property dwellings, all as shown on Exhibit 1. Such easement shall include a right of access across the Prince Parcel and the Bryson Parcel as is reasonably necessary to install, use, maintain and repair said septic system. 6. Subsequent to the construction and installation of such septic system, the parties agree to attach hereto as Exhibit 2 a copy of an "as built" survey of such septic system, which Exhibit 2 shall thereupon replace Exhibit 1 for purposes of defining the easement and maintenance a^eements incorporated in this Agreement. The parties hereto agree to share equally in the costs of said "as built" survey. • «• /7. The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall Inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto, their respective heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, and shall run with the land.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands as of the day and year first above written. .h Fosjysy^rlnce ^ -I William E. Br^ ^ tihgArvvfvZSf. Bry^riThelma L. STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) •-7.The foregoing Instrument as acknowledged before me i±^ day of AUflf/sr . 1995^y Elizabeth Foster Prince, widow not remaz^led. / I ___ ^ this a Notary Publl STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS CHRISTIC. DYSART NOTARY PUeyC-UlNNESOTA C««nl»5o« CipiiM 3t. MWiKSg COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this ^^^day of 1995, by William E. Bryson II and Thelma L. Bryson, husbhnd and wlfe^ M'3^L/vwa ■RMirnauc Notary Public NgJJgJJCOUNIY ...........*»»t»»wSSSSS> - /oo a SA.-P-Ti*/; Irf'o.a. Li'^vk X'u A.^&s 'tWuc.u MW.‘F=<. <9 Ptfootolion XSoit Boring’ ®B»Kh Mor Note: This Sf the Mnm Chaptt' Check a PRCPe¥.•0^ PsVA^ ’^^'JVW^vX OfifS. 09P--Y«><^»rrK\t'V< rZ3k£: Oesignt Cote:!l i 9 Legal Dcacrintion Lot 3, Pleasant View, Lake Minnetonka Lot 4, Pleasant View, Lake Minnetonka PLEASANT VIEW AT LAKE MINNETONKA (Lots 3-8) Property Address 680 Big Island 670 Big Island Lots 5 and 6, Pleasant 660 Big Island View, Lake Minnetonka Lots 7 and 8, Pleasant 650 Big Island View, Lake Minnetonka PID Current Owners 22-117-23 24 0004 William E. Bryson, II Thelma L. Bryson 22-117-23 24 0005 William E. Bryson, H Thelma L. Bryson 22-117-23 31 0026 William E. Bryson, II Thelma L.Bryson James A. R. Johnson 22-117-2i 31 0027 James A. R. Johnson Mailing Address and Phone of Current Owners 11650 Timberline Road Minnetonka, MN 55305 (H) 544-4161 (W) 544-7200 (William) 11650 Timberline Road Minnetonka, MN 55305 (H) 544-4161 (W) 544-7200 (William) See above and below. 420 4th Street NE Watertown, SD 57201 ” /W %J ®I MIN 6ATE 01/08/9»“TiKp'eSJ'issEsrjs?”"' *”™ •ATCH 585 MOP ADDR OWNER NAHE taxpayer NANE/AODR SO 22-117-25 2A OOOl 00720 BIO ISLAND TRXSTXN 0 ERICKSON ET AL TRXSTIN 0 ERICKSON 0S07 BOTH ST W HPLS HN 55037 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SO 22-117-23 20.0000 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXDNED RECREATION POINT LLC RECREATION POINT LLC S721 KACHINA OR E PHOENIX AZ 85000 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SO 22-117-2S 20 0010 00000 0X6 ISLAND ROB BRUDER ROBERT 0 BRUDER 2500 07 1/2 ST W BLOOHXN6TON HN 550S1 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SO 22-117-23 31 0010 00030 BXe ISLAND DOUGLAS E PERSON ET AL W/L JEFFREY A PERSON 17305 OTH AVE N PLYHOUTH HN S5007 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NM1E/AODR nso 22-117-23 31 0020 WILLIAH e“r VSOYJ *j: W E BRYSON II * T L BRYS^ I jar JOHNSON 11050 TXHB5RLINE RO HXNNETONKA HN 555fi PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHf'ADOR 50 22-il7-2S 41 0020 •0570 BXr ISLAND. JOOIL R WA’<eAS ET AL SELDEN THC1PSON ROBB JR P 0 BOX 2^ i SPRING PAf < HN 55384 so 22-117-25 24 0004 00000 BIG ISLAND W BRYSON 0 T BRYSON WILLIAH 0 THELHA BRYSON 11050 TIHBERLXNE RO HXNNETONKA HN 55305 SO 22-117-2S 24 0008 00700 BIG ISLAND RECREATION POINT LLC RECREATION POINT LLC S721 KACHINA DR E PHOENIX AZ 05044 SO 22-117-23 51 0002 00500 BIG ISLAND don HENDERSON ET AL don HENDERSON 5018 NORHAHOALE CT NPLS HN 55430 SO 22-117-23 31 0011 00030 BIG ISLAND DOUGLAS E PERSON ET AL W/L E JEFFREY A PERSON 17545 9TH AVE N PLYHOUTH HN 55447 SO 22-117-23 31 0027 Tkl JOHNSON JAHES A R JOHNSON 420 4TH ST N E 0400 WATERTOWN SO 57201-2030 SO 22-117-23 31 0030 00040 BIG ISLAND CLINTON KHUDSON CLINTON KNUDSON 1823 FRANKLIN AVE S E HPLS HN 55414 refort HO. P1435401 PAGE 7 SO 22-117-2S 24 0005 •0070 BIG XSLAmO H E BRYSON * T L BRYSON WILLIAH 0 THELHA BRYSON 11050 TIHBERLZNE RD HXNNETONKA HN 55305 SO 22-117-23 24 0004 00710 BIG ISLAND HICHAEL J WEINER HICHAEL J WEINER 320 WEST ILLINOIS 0411 CHICAGO IL 40010 SO 22-117-2S 31’ 0^04 ' 00030 BIG ISLAND DOUGLAS E PERSON ET AL W/L E JEFFREY A PERSON 17345 4TH AVE H PLYHOUTH HN 55447 SO 22-117-2S 31 0020 00540 BIG ISLAND JUNE H FIEGER TRUSTEE JUNE H FIEGER . 14001 ATRIUH HAY 0324 HXNNETONKA HN 55345 SO 22-117-25 51 0020 •0050 BIG ISLAND _ JAR JDHHSON 0 H L JOWKOH JANES A R JOHNSON 420 4TH ST H E 8400 HATERTOHN SO 57201-2430 SO 22-117-23 31 0031 00500 BIO ISLAND JUNE H FIEGER TRUSTEE JUNE H FIEGER 14001 ATRIUH HAY 0324 HXNNETONKA HN 55345 K RUN DATE Ol/fS/99 BATCH StS mOf AOOR ONNER NAME TAXfAVER NANE/AODR 58 22-117-2S SI 0032 00420 DXO ISLAND N A t S N HILL WEBSTER A S SHELLEY N HILL 4081 DEERHOOD TR EADAN HN 55122 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORNATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 58 22>117*25 SI 003S 00410 BIO ISLAND KENNETH t PLUNKETT KENNETH K PLUNKETT C/0 LONOFELLOH NHSE CORP 1840 28TH ST E NPLS' HN 55407 REPORT NO. PX4S5401 PACE 8 SB 22-117-2S SI 00S4 . 00400 BIO ISLAND GEORGE L 0 DONNA L ADANS GEORGE L S DONNA L ADANS 9501 VXRGXNXA AVE BLOONXNGTON HN 554S8 PROP ADDR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR TOTAL BATCH BBS 00021 X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORNATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATI0N« TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. i . DATE BY ¥S I* . K. ^ address PERMIT RECORD ln1C> Permit No:P^ta Tyne of Permit ^U'9,'^S-S-Ti 133 1 n -3.-L 3 <2- 9-(^"S • • • . > HABDCOVER SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) T.YTST1NC H ARPCOVER TN ZONE A. House _____________ X ERf^isqULA'HON WORKSHEET 75-350* 250-500* LMgih WUA B. Oirtfe, ; C. lirtvewey . D. SidewtOc E. Pado/Decic F. Landseqie Vnderlatn ByPlesdd OrFabrio X X X- - • •••» — m • •• • •• I X- 0 • X X X X X X X X X • • • • O. Odier TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A . ♦. B yymi»nsF.p Warpcover in zone A. House X .. xioo - Lenfih Width B. Oarage C. Driveway D. SfdewaOc • • 'B. Pat!o/Deck F. Landscape Underiain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X . ■ • X X X X X X X X X • • 500-1000* SJ. SK ST. S.F. L :i ST. ST. ST. ST. ® ST. qr. B ^ ST.(g^ isz. q ® _________,S.F. __________ST. __________ST. 3a.^ © ___SJ(3> I 0l9.t/ ST. A ST; B .ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. “ST. ST. S.F. S.F. ST. • ST. ST. O. Olher • • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ____________ ♦ B xlOO - ST. ST. A ST. B y. *1 \J> ® HARDCOVER CALCULA' SETBACK ZONES (CIRCLBONQ 0-75* ■gVTSTINC H AHPrnVER TN ZQWB A. House ____________ X ___ OIUCSREET 250400*500>1000* LtagCi ilO‘U SJ. WUdi B. ‘ C brivewty . X X X SJ. SJT. - • • • •• X- • S.F, d> • »» • S.F. • •• • X X • ••.S.F, •S.F. D. Sidewtik X X I ®i ST.(S> E Fftdo/Dedc X X ta C.L. S.F. ^ fzS.g- S.F./g>> F. Lendseape Vaderlala ByPlMti^ OrFibifo X X X .S.F. S.F. _SJ. 4* O. baser •.SJ. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 3 ♦ B lo &Qg>»- xTOO 32*k3 SF. io. o S.F." 3.0^ A B • • • A. House m X ■■SJF. Ltntib X Width • SJ, X SJ. X S3. B. Oarage C. DtWeway X „ , • S3. • X •. ••S3. _____ X .S3. • D. StdewaOc X ••• ^ • • : • •• m -S3. _ X S3. • • • E Patlo/Deck •• X • SB • SF. X .S.F. F. Landscape Underlain X \ M S.F. X ■>S.F. By Plastic Or Fabric X SF. • • , • • 0. Odser •• • • • * ■ MM • • X • . • •, • SF. • • *• • • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE • • m •• SF. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE m SF. A ♦ B xlOO -% • •31 A / 07^r jO .1^'^ y,‘% ■a kM A B • • 220.0® ^63.05. f^6i« to* V* t?8P uiroM-"^' A69-^?.-I- \\»<^^ w i / / 5^’ ------------------------- * it to* ^\60.AO on ?:t I # \y'm J5050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 BH phone 612/476-6010 " /<7x 612/476-8532MeCwntoFraHlloestatSkMlE ccdd»nfro.com Oesl^ntd Scolt None Drown Proiecl No. OWS 11170 Dolt Sheet Na 12/10/98 HARDCOVER CALCULATION SHEET L0TS3&4 HABDCOVER CALCULATION WOlUCSHEET C T <o SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE OIQQ TYTSTTNC HARDCOVER TM TCVm^ t&aso'25OS0V 500-100<r A. House X m ^<\on.^_SE. ^ LMgdi Wlddi ------ * X .ST. : M ao.o sp. 0^ %.S.F. • • * / •* B. Oeiiixt * • -X '• / •ISP. Cl Driveway . . x • ‘• • ••• • •:.SP. ... X m .SP. D. Sidewalk « x _sp. (T> X • .1— " — .SP. • E. Bade/Deck , ^ x _ • •i _SP. d> i_... X *aT. 1 P. Lindsey * • X _____ • C^O.“7 ..S.F. d> Underialn x •> ^.SP. By Plasdd T T ...... x ■i ^.SP. OrFArip • • • •• • • . *• Q. 0*er *. _ ____ X • •• • -SP. • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE _SP. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ”7.SS/L,.0 „SP.- B •• xlOO • • • • „ •• fftOPOSPD nABDCOVER IN ZONP^ •• • • • •• A House x ‘■i __SP. Uetih WMh X • SP. X SP. X Isp. B. Oaraae x • _SP. • C. Driveway X •••SP. , X .-SP. • D- Sidewalk *” x ’ •-^SP. X •_SP. • • .*• • E. Pado/Dcdc X • SB • SP. X _SP. F. Landscaoe x \ *1 SP. *• Underlata x S.F. ByPIastie _ x _SP. OrFabric •• • • • • • Q. O&er x . . • • • —SP. • • • • TOTAL KARDCOVERIN ZOI^ • la • S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A B SP. B % f.-J h ^ r __ • HABDCOVER CALOJlA’ngjiJa^RKSHE^^ ^ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ 250-500’ 500-1000 ^yt STING H ARPCQVER IN ZONE --------- , A. Houw . X ---------------— -S.F. $lVEt» Ltflcdi WUch X X X B. Ou^e.. ] \C, Driv«w«y . , »•••••• • X- • • X X • • 1). Sidewalk X X E. Pado/Deek X X F. tandse^ Underlain ByPlasdd Or Fabric X X X a* • • O. Odier *. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE . A ♦. B •-!- xrlOO ypopnsEP HAPnrQVER IW ZONE A. House Lcn|ih Vndth X X X n GmM X r Driveway • X X • • n. sidewalk X X • • • ■V Pario/Deck X X F. Landscape X Underlain X AyPItstle X OrFabrie • • • O. Other • « S.F.(S> : S.F. “S.F. • S.F. • ..S.F. S.F. -70 I 9 SJ. S.F.® S.F. _.S.F. S.F. “S.F. / ST»&,s>. Q) x88.*^ SJ. A B • • • '•a • S.F. S.F. S.F. SJr. ^S.F. SJ. SJF. -ST. "“ST. S.F. S.F. S.F. * S.F. ST. • •S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ____________ B • • • CD O o Lklt8 p , f, *; I * Iu V fr (W .1^ \inFRA 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 612/476-60W caddSnfra^ OtsiQntd Sedt None HARDCOVER CALCULATION SHEETDrownProjtcl No. OWS 11170 LOTS 5 & 6OoloShoot Na 12/10/M r habdcover calculation worksheet e SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)75^0*350^0*500-1000’ EXTSTINGR ARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X ^» __•Zift.O ST. d) Lco(di ••X „ WMA ST. X ^• * M ST. X _ •ST. . • 1 * 0 • •• • M • X* * ^ • • • m •• • * f ST. • . • • • • . C TVtveWnV .•X • • • • .• • i • • • . . t :.ST. X ST. • T> StdewiDc X . ^ • 10-7. a* ST. X .•ST. V Thittfi/Dfidt X 10*2.^. O ST. ^ X S' ST. ® * <m X .ST. TTffiiffifl&txi X ST. Tlv PlftStid X ST. OrFibH^ • • • • • 4 • JL • • fli ea.6. _ •TVNTAI lJAllT^rV^\^eP TW ^ATJP iM6,0.*{ ST. A Aw kr\U AirWINA^WW V Ael\ •r/%TAt PPnOPPTV APPA TM!70TJE •S3B(-0 ST.- B iOXA m ai ^wa C»i>i t in4 A fawns# ^ B R3 e» i •xTOO - •• !n 5 % • HARDCOVER IN ZONE • •• • ip • •• S.F.A Housft • X Lcnfih X vndA • ST. X ■■ST. X _____ »ST. X ai ST. • c Tvtvewiy X ••ST. X Ml ST. • T> SMemSt • • X •• • • • Vi•-ST. X •*ST. • • • PL PAtlo/DecIc • ••• X •• ■B • ST. X ~ -ST. P t AlulsCADP X \ ^S.T. ’ Und^rlAtn X •ST. Pv PlftStlc X ST. Or Fabric •• • • • O. OAer • • X . . •. • > • • • • •SF. * • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ♦ B xlOO - ST. A ST. Bn ouiai oUlM HABDCOVER CALCULATl^lWORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (dRCLEONlQ 0-75* /7$^0p 250-500’ TgyTSTTNG H AmaCOVER TN ZONB ------- ^ "I k e> 500-1000’ A. House . „ , '»■■i T.115*. s _SJ. CD Lcottfi ^ <U«.T^ • X WUdi nM.I _S.F. *•SP. • • Mi %„S.F. • • • • . •; •, , • • ^ • •• • •• • B. Oaiife " ___ • x- ■ • • .• • • •ISJ. • * • • - • . : . C. ifriveWiy . • x • • • m 9• 9 • •# • •jI-SP. X «S.F. • D. SidewtOc „ X 9 IW- ^_sf.0 MV _SJ. E. Pado/Dedc . ... x . - - . X _SP. P. Landsetpe •, _ x _.S.F. Underliln ........ x «i „SP. ByPlesdd _ X m _SP. ^Febiip • . ••O. Odier *. , ... x • m 2S.H • _sp. (D TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE •2^zm s.-f SP. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A *2.2.WS'. “7 ♦ B •io.U^3.o_SP.- B lO •• xTOO ••2.1.0 V» • PROPOSED TTABDCOVER TN ZONR . A- House _ . X* •• • • •• _SP. \ Un|lh , X WUdi •a #■ • SP. X SP. X «■_SP. B. Gense x • _SP. • C. Driveway . x •••SP. _ X _SP. • D- StdewiDc ‘ x e •• J1S.F. X •_SP. • • • E. Patio/Deck x • MB • _S.F. X •«_SP. P. Landsetoe _ x *. gp «P •w tie Underlain x S.F. BvPIastle x «i _SP. OrPabrie ••• • • • • O. OAer x . .IP . •_S.F. • ^ * e TOTAL HARDT y/ER IN ZONE • • • • m • SP. A TOTAL PROPERTY ARiA IN ZONE m SP. B A _ B xlOO -_____% • •# O /I J Jf eflfl1cJln I 9 '^s ^50.0*i .... ^g.o5 o ® v« 1^ ,% \ \»r \ \ 220.0^ paiVHO \ \ \ \ rA ,x"? •..:* • .* •) 'if ••• r.*— 1 j J c-'-^ •n \v. _ ^ 15050 23rd Avenue North RM tt Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 ■VI l*VV Bk phone 612/4(- SOW ■■■■ ■ fox 612/476-8532 MtCcabtl^lIwi ^.uait: coddemfro.com Designed Scolt None Drown Project No. ows 11170 Dote Sheet Na 12/10/98 HARDCOVER CALCULATION SHEET LOTS 7 & 8 SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ^rVTCTnWC H ARPCOVBP TN ZONB A. House ____________ HABDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 75250'250-500'500-1000' LnfUi B. 5H6P ~ •• C. D. Sidewalk E. Fado/Deck P. laadseape Underlain ByPlastid OrFabrio • • • 0. X X X j X X X X. X X X • X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •xfl7C. • fPOTOSEP HARDCQVE r ’iN ZONE A. House ____________ Ltfiflh B. Oarage C. Driveway X X X D. SldewaOc E. Pado/Dcck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic OrF^rl': X X X X X X X X X O. Odier WUib m ^ • •• • •• • X- • • • • • • • B inOOg: 6r xTOO - WIttI • • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ♦ B xlOO “ 1\ 0*2..T .ST. qoT. ?•.ST. (tD : .ST.- %.S.F. * / # • 1 ,ST. • 30.0- • • :sT. 6^ SJ. fl -ST. © n. R .ST.® lA.n .S.F. ® _S.F.fth 1^2.q ST. ST. UO-1 • _ST. ^ Zo.H aBTy.z S.F. A in SoS ’.fi S.F.- B Xfo.W • _ST. • S.F. ST. ST. • _ST. ••ST. ST. •-ST. ST. • ST. S.F. ST. *• ST. ST. • __S.F. . • S.F. A ST. B % 'ja ^3 L. -f O X f UAKueu yi !;r calcuuvx SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) fr-75' TTKISTING H ART>rOVER TN TONE A. House _____________ X ____ VOKKSREbT 250-500’ Lnsih WUih X X • • B. SHSP, T • • C. Drivewiy . D. Sidewalk E. Pado/Dcdc F. Landscape Underlain ByPlastid OrF^e * • • • a X X X. X X X . X X • • • • m 4« O. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A . ♦ B /f^/x3.‘a-r_ x 100 - . * * •• •ppftpnCTP TTARPCQVER TN ZONE A. House______________X-------------------------- Lcnsth Width B. Garate C. Driveway D. Sidewalk • • E. Pario/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X X X X X X 0. Odier • • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ♦ B xlOO - 500-1000' W0.(g SJ. (2> iSU.7. SJ. © : _ _ _ _ _ _SI,- _ _S.F. SE. :si, Zsi. _SJ.@ \_SLF.® SE. A ^S.F.‘ B •a.<l_ _% S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SI, SI, -S.F. “si. SI, SI, Si, S.F. SI, SI. SI,A B X A %• «o<«o ?/ • 6l?l / •%# \\w\w\ ® »V<K^ % ^ uiro^ "/ %# ijSS? t«MO ^5* a jji \ •«* / off C^"j!j’ • 'i...^ /505(7 ^Jrc/ Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 612/476-6010 ■■ /<jjf 612/476-8532 McCombs Frank Root £—Moil: coddOmfro.com fflFR Assoditis. Inc. OcsIgncO Scolo Nont Drown Project No. DWS 11170 Dot*Sheet No. 12/10/98 •V •%» HARDCOVER CALCULATION SHEET HAKDCOVERCAI^ClJLA'nON AYORKbHliET r= SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)75-250'250-500' 3^.1 KliU A. House X “ LcBi:ih •' X ___ WUih . X __- * X . ____ 7 • A * • •-iut—• • .• • • Tl A rpam • . X- • ___• .* • • • ■ . X • • • • •••9•.1••• ,1^ " n SIftewiIk • X . • X. ___•^ “ V Pitin/Declc X ___ X __ X ^ T Tfiif • X «_ T)v Plifriti X ^„ " OrF^rie •• • • . ♦ •X • • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE • . is-os. 5 * B ••xlOO "• •m • VPOVnSflD W APT>rOVER TN ZONE • •• • • • A Hnutfi X ___ Lwjth •width «•_____ X „m X « VK Cf9T%7% m X ______ • n TV iv ^wav _ X . • ______ I X . _ • • n ^UevftUk • _ X ' . * : . • ■i I X . . • • 1 * • _ X 1» Y Ari($frtM _ X iTnderlttn _ X ■* By PlftSttc __ X — ** OrF^ric • • • • • • • 9 • • X • .- •» • _________ 9 • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE • • •• TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ____________ B 500-1000* ^ I 6.0 S o Sf. S.F.- S.P. • SJr. SJP. SJ'. 10*7^SJ. Sf. S*F» ■rr?f^ ■ 4- • • • • ' A,* . .. JJ i «/ *J^ Am '•» • * f j "v:::;' ..S.F. S.F. SJF. e>&. s>. (3) l^os.^ SJ. A "~S.F.- B V. SJ. SJF. S.F. SJ. ST. ST. ST. -ST. ST. ST. ST. S.F. ST. ST. S.F. ST. A ST. B HABDCOVER CALCDIATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) (KTS* 250-SOO* TYIgTTNG T? ARPrOVBR TV TfWtP. L,jx <>-g 500-1000' A. House X 'z.nS’.S' SJ. CD Length • ’ X width SF. _ . X SF.- - - - X * •S.F. B. Spco * • • • • • • •*••••• • • X- •#a1•••• C. Driveway . • • • •• * : . X • • •SF. X SF. D. Sidewalk • ■ X . • SF. X SF. E. Piti<yDeck • X X »AO .T SF. C<0 F. Landscape Underialn X .SF. .X SF. ByPlasdd Or Fabric • • • • X m SF. • • • 4 • 0. ^TAia.5 • • X • •Z^M SF. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE L PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE * B ZWX.(e. *f SF. A TOTAl A •IS-9VS.O SF.' B ir^VS".©- xlOO - ••1*4. <p % •• PPOPOSCn HARDCOVER TN ZONE . * • • • •• A. House • X SF. Length X width • SF. X •SF. X ■i SF. B. Garaxe X • SF. C Drivew^X •• ^SF. X SF. • D. Sidewalk • ^ • X • •• A •• •W -SF. X "" SF. •• • • 'E. Pado/Deck • • X • SF. X wm SF. F. Landscape Underitb X • SF. ’ X SF. By Plastic X -SF. Or Fabric O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ B S.F. S.F. A S^. B fyo T (T% X., fy M XjJt/ W" I 0^^ y* ^50*^?'''T*" 1®-®^ '4V»^ \ >A ...e\ * 1 7505^7 2Jr«/ ylvwjye /Vor//> Hlymouth, Minnesota • 55^^7 phone 612/476-6010 fax 612/476-8532 *^SoS!ii£*Iiks* £-^oil: cadd^fro.com mFRA Designed Scale None Drown Project No. OWS 11170 Dote Sheet No. 12/10/98 HARDCOVER CALCULATION SHEET 7 TO;Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:March 3,1999 SUBJECT: #2462 David Lovelace 220 Big Island Variance-Public Hearing Zoning District:Seasonal Recreational (5 acre) Lot Area:4.3 acres Application: The applicant is requesting a lot area variance to create a buildable lot on Big Island. The existing lot is 4.3 acres where 5 acres is the minimum lot size for building. The applicant has purchased the lot and plans to construct a seasonal residence in the near future. Most lots on Big Island were granted automatic lot area variances in 1983 when the island was rezoned to RS (5 acre). Property owners were given the opportunity to file a short application form on their individual lots to the City. All property owners returning forms to the City were granted variances by Resolution. The resolutions state each lot is a RECORD LOT and may used for one- family seasonal recreational use without a structure; or a single new seasonal dwelling may be built; or an existing seasonal dwelling may be used, improved, added-onto or replaced; all without requiring further City Council review of lot size. The variances were granted on developed and undeveloped lots, and the one year expiration time period was waived. A previous property owner was given the opportunity to apply for the automatic variance several times in the 1980s, but never responded to the offers. In 1986 the automatic variance at no cost to the property owner had expired. This application requires the following variance: 1.Section 10.31, Subdivision 6 requires 5.0 dry acres for a lot to be buildable. The applicant's lot is under S.O acres and did not file for an automatic variance in the 1980s and requests to do so now. U2462 David Lavitac^ 220 Big Island Varianct 3/13/99 Page 1 Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.31 - RS Seasonal Recreational District Condition of Property The lot contains an old cabin that is inhabitable. The roof has caved in and walls are falling. The applicant must apply to the City for a demolition permit and remove the existing cabin prior to new construction. A small wetland exists in the center of the property. It is a non-Orono wetland. The following activities on the property must meet minimum setbacks from the wetland. Structure 26' Grading/FUl 26' Septic Sites/Well 75' Property Access Big Island contains a network of platted roads that are undeveloped. Access to inland lots is provided by the platted right-of-ways. No permits or improvements are required to use the roads. The main concern for inland property owners is boat storage since they do not have riparian rights. Private property owners are not permitted to provice dock space or boat storage on their properties for access to inland residents and guests. Although permits would not be regularly issued, the City Council can grant permits for dock space or boat storage within public right-of-ways. Not more than one seasonal dock will be approved for access to any one property. In review and approval or denial of such permit, the Council will consider the topography and development of the locality. The dock must also conform to Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and City of Orono standards. Surrounding Properties The property is a landlocked parcel without lake access. Access to the property is via platted, undeveloped roads. A road is platted that is located adjacent to the east and southern portions of the applicant's property. The west side of the parcel is the Dr. Arthur Allen Wildlife Refuge (Hennepin County Parks). The north side of the property is a year round residence that is currently occupied. 92462 Datld Lovelace 220Bigbtand Variance VIS/99 Fate 2 L ISSUfiS 1.No variance was granted to permit 220 Big Island to be a legal, record lot. The opportunity to apply to the City for a "free" automatic variance has expired. 2. 3. One property to the north exists without lake access. The lot has been in use for many years. The main concern for inland property owners is boat storage since they do not have riparian rights. Private property owners are not permitted to provide dock space or boat storage on their properties for access to inland residents and guests. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variance to permit 220 Big Island to be a buildable lot, and to waive the one year expiration for the variance. Attachments A B C D E F Application/Statement of Hardship Plat Map Big Island Map Site Topography Property Owners List Historical documents regarding variance for 220 Big Island i i §2462 David Lovtlaci 220 Big Island Variance S/15/99 Fags 3 A CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from ori^nal application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATIO] Annlication# _____ Date Received f i Amount Paid ^ lOPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ^____________ Property Identificatioh Number (ri.P.Y b 3 - /j- 2 ^ if not included on required survey. Xmonth^ear) Present use of property: Zomt\g District:______ readential f land. I I other (specify ) / y^f ArO / APPUCANT 1 Name _Jjav /D Address: 13. n IA jp&W/.gL/ Phonefhome) Phone(wotk)/p/7. City: flUt)Ok9f) OWNER (if different than applicwt] Name Address: K l ^i^ Phone (home)b (cSIlU Phone (work) ^ ________ Citv:FX^kine..Ztp:.S5l34 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST . Estimated Co.nstnicdon <^st $ Describe request in detail: 4.dPr Agj I 9 Au^ \ J p/A lAO 4n riW / J^q^^rrLpli *)Cl^ * (attach additional shMts if necessary) VAIUANCES REQUIRED V Lot Area 4 Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage H Average Lakesho Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing requirements: uO f Ls yltjdAcompliance with Zoning Code requirements: LiOv \.9an/LtV Si"z^ ^pp/ci tk)V iv ■? PA/g./u !if^pnh • ' (attach additional sheets if necessary) l9Ai<mUce cji'cl 6 v": :ty of orono oK f .• •% ••* • \ (1) .••’ C ait uy.9i i006.r — UM -•Tzt___________ sao*f • •••••••••••••••••••••MM A3-"7' r.s«* mm :•^(IS) •ff 320 1 & (• r j • 1UUpfl 1 r 5rir \ \1 ^^'V*'4s7a \ § '.a ‘1^ Tz)” ■'■ ■’ W I N ‘TM'MeiUlLWEINIIl TM-CHCKYLIUMtTAOHVASS IM.MAKCAMTSCIIimL*- ’"•JPsassssrsst.M™. •N.ionttrnumni «1MH«WIUUM BRYSON ««<BITTVr.rRWCB «« • eiWrON NNUBBON sM-nmivmioN MOSO-ntBOAUtUNnSI. -V 4M>EUao«A.HILSaN. - v 4*0-rEOS. HANNA---------\_ ^ % 4tO.JOHM?AHOOO 47e.SAMUfLMCCtOCD YimUflSCAAl BlAOf : m Ut'MHNaURAN l4S>Tn«USTAVL0R m»WM.UUBMARK in.miANiniantc ■ m-JosmBACxks IIO.obraIOLWAIJH tM*mnitNO>tfARA M.MiasoOUMD m.JAOCmAMAN 3M> MRS. nn> KALIS MO'DAVDSAARI 440-lie *®*^**® BIG. ISLAND LANDOWNERS JULY 1. IW nr. m ut o I RUN DATE 02/08/9f HENNEPIN COUNTY WMJ^RTV IHFORHATIOM SYSTEM PRONr'? *dNERS UST REPORT NO. PX4S5401 PACE S •ATCH SIX PROP ATOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 50 22-117*2S 10 0001 ••TOO BXO XSLAND HENN CO PARK RESERVE DXST HENN CTY PARK RESERVE DXST RTE X BOX 29t HAPLE PLAXN HN 5S5S9 SO 22-117-2S 14 0005 00741 BXO XSUND HENN CTY PARK RES DXST NENN CO PAMC RESERVE OXS 0 BOX 29A NAPtE PLAXN HN S5559 SO 2S-117-2S 22 0002 00150 BXO XSLAND X NAROARET SCNEPTEL X NAROARET SCHEFTEL BOX 17t EXCELSXOR HN S5551 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 50 2S-117-2S 22 0010 00120 BXO XSLAND J 0 URAN 0 J 0 URAN JOHN D URAN BOX 290 EXCELSXOR MN SS551 30 25-117-23 25 0005 00240 BXO XSLAND FRED A BRUNTJEN FRED A BRUNTJEN BOX 504 EXCELSXOR HN 55331 SO 23-117-25 23 0004 00240 BXO XSLAND FRED A BiniNTJEN FRED A BRUNTJEN BOX 504 EXCELSXOR HN 55551 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO 25-117-25 25 0015 00100 BXO XSLAND Q E 0 V WALSH GERALD E 0 VALERXE WALSH 1*950 NANOR RD N EDEN PRAIRIE HN 5534* 50 23-117-23 23 001* 00100 BXO XSLAND C E t V WALSH GERALD E I VALERXE WALSH 1*950 NANOR RD N EDEN PRAXRXE HN 5534* SO 25-117-25 25 0019 001*0 BXO XSLAND JOHN D URAN DUANE DENNING 9117 NORHAN RIDGE CXR BLOONXNOTON NN 55457 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SO 25-117-23 25 0*20 *01*0 BXO XSLAND JOHN D URAN 0 WIFE DUANE BEHNXN6 9117 NORMAN RIDGE CXR BLOONXNOTON NN 55437 50 23-117-23 25 0020 0*220 BIG XSLAND X MARGARET SCHEFTEL X MARGARET SCHEFTEL P 0 DOX 17* EXCELSXOR NN 55SS1 SO 25-117-25 23 0029 *017* BXO ISLAND JOSEPH N 0 MARIE J BACKES JOSEPH N 0 NARXE J BACKES LOT 51 BIG ISLAND DOX 103 EXCELSXOR NN ■55331 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO 25-117-25 25 0*3* *0150 DIG XSLAND 0 L 0 W F LXLJENARK TRUSTEES WILLIAM 0 OAYLYNN LXLJENARK 1014* 27TH AVE N WAYZATA NN 55447 SO 23-117-23 25 0051 00140 BIG XSLAND THOMAS L TAYL9R 0 WIFE JOHN D 0 CHERr. SCOTT URAN 9 CENTER ST EXCELSXOR NN 55551 ‘ SO 25-117-2S 23 *052 0*200 BXO XSLAND JANES W OOLAND JANES W OGLAND 525 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATA NN 55591 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SB 23-117-25 25 0055 00230 BXO XSLAND E HALES 0 A SAAR MRS FRED HALES 5711 ARBOR LA S MINNETONKA HN 55505 50 25-117-25 25 0054 *021* DIG XSLAND J A I X XSAANAN JACK A XSAANAN 5500 W HXGHWOOD DR EDINA NN' 5545* 50 25-117-25 25 0*55 *019* BXO XSUND STEPHEN R O'OARA STEPHEN R 0«OARA 2914 W 44TH ST MPLS HN 5541* Tt\ irYivnmi'Br ■UN BATE tl/M/n BATCH SCE P«OP ABBR BtlNCR NAHE TAXr.VER NAME/AB6R PROP ABBR ONNER NAfC TAXPAYER NAHE/ABBR S8 2S*117-2S S2 OOlt tIARO BIO ISLAND TIP HANNA TED R HANNA lAllfi KNOLLHAV DR S HXNNETONKA HN SSSOS 58 2S-117-2S.32 8H2 •Mil BXe ISLAND J I C PANOZZO CELIA PANOZZO 48219 EYOTHA NAY ONANIA HN S4SS9 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFOIHATION SYSTEM property owners list REPORT NO. PX4SS401 PACE - 4 38 2S*117-2S 52 0819 00580 BIB ISLAND EUGENE A NELSON EUGENE A NELSON 9720 SRD ST N E «LAINC MN 55454 58 23-117-25 52 0020 00250 5X0 ISLAND FRED A BRUNT JEN FRED A BRUNT JEN ■OX 584 EXCELSIOR MN 55351 I • - TOTAL BATCH 502 00022 1 « 1 03 OF NY KNOHLCOGE AND BELIEF. 0 CITY of ORONO Pott Ofliet Box 66«Cry«Ul Bay. Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka March 10, 1986 Georgia Ruud 13611 Valley View Rd Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Record Lot #8 Dear Big Island Landowner: In reviewing our Big Island files, it has come to the City’s attention that you (or a previous owner of your Big Island property) never returned the proper forms for granting of an automatic lot area variance in 1983, when the District was created. "RS" or Seasonal Recreational Zoning* Perhaps this was an oversight, or perhaps you did not wish to return the forms at that time. In either case, your Big Island property currently has NOT been officially granted variances to lot area or lot width, and you would have to file for these variances in order to be allowed to do any building or remodeling on your property. Although nearly 2/3 of the Big Island property owners returned the proper forms to be granted the lot area variances in 198 3 (at no cost to the property owner), approximately 1/3 have not returned them, and the filing fee for a variance application currently is $150.00. Because there may have been some misunderstandings of the no-cost automatic variance procedure in 1983, you again have the opportunity to return the proper forms and be granted the lot area variance at no charge. Attached you will find the following documents: A) Copy of letter to you dated February 15, 1983, describing how to be granted the automatic lot area variances. B) The official record lot notice (blue paper). C) 3 copies of an official resolution draft (white paper with green City logo). D) A description of specific uses that require a Conditional Use Permit (yellow paper). BUILDING a ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING Page 1 of 2 ADMINISTRATION A FINANCE - 473*7358 PUBLIC WORKS - 473-7359 i E) An official lot combination/combined assessment request form (Your lots as described on the official record lot notice must be legally combined as part of the automatic lot area variance process), (Green paper). F) A summary of the 1983 “RS" Zoning Ordinances. • The procedure to follow in order to be granted the automatic lot area variance is as follows: 1) Review the information on the blue record lot notice. If no' changes are necessary, sign all 3 copies of the official resolution draft and have them notarized. Send all 3 copies back to the City. 2) If you wish to apply for a specific vise that requires a Conditional Use Permit, note that on the yellow form and return that form also. • 3) Sign the green lot combination form and return it to the City with the other items. Forms must be submitted by Wednesday, April 30, 1986 in order to be granted the variance at no cost. Please contact Mike Gaffron at the City offices at 473-7357 if you have any questions. Sincerely' Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Zoning Administrator Enclosure Page 2 of 2 CITYof ORONO Post omot Box 66 • CrysUl Bay. Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka fe/?3 2S-U7-Z3 •fit'*- ^tsf" « €>P ^/tr/rs Z3 ffazB J February 15, 1983 ( Record Lot #8 ) ilili ffalley View Rd Eden Prairie, m 55344 Dear.Island Landowner: a The purpose of this letcer Is to provide you with Inforoatlon regarding the recent zoning changes on Big Island* and how these changes nay affect your property. The new RS Seasonal Recreational zoning regulations were established- by City Council adoption of Ordinance P2A6 on December 30, 1982. This action also ended the development moratorium that had been in effect since November 9, 1981. A summary of the ordinance Is attached. If you are Interested, a ^«**i*«« ordinance is also available for a nominal charge of $3.00 to defer printing and mailing costs. Your property Is Identified in the ordinance by the Record Lot Number shown above and on the attached blue page. This Identification Is part Of a special section that Inventories lot by lot the ownership patterns and existing uses of Island property. Based on this record, the ordinal rights for these Record Lots by making the: eligible for lot area variances. This means that for the first tine even if your lot is less than five acres (or two acres under the prevloi ordinance) that you may now build a new seasonal cabin, or If you alreac have a cabin,that It nay continue to be used. Improved, added>onto or replaced with a new cabin, subject to building permits and setback regulations, etc., but without questioning Its use for building purpose: and without requiring any special City Council review. In order for you to automatically receive the benefits of the lot area TSio should review and complete the following before July 1, 1. Please verify the Record Lot Information on the attached blue page and notify the City If there lo a problem or a change. (over) BUILDl.SCa ZONING - 473-7 J57 AS.SESSING AD.MI.MSTKATION a finance - 473-7338 FUtilC WORKS - 473-7359 Island Landowners February 15* 1983 Page 2 2, If the Record Lot information is complete* please sign* have notarized and return the white Variance Resolution. State lav requires that all zoning variances be recorded with the County Recorder in resolution form. Returning this resolution is optional but if you choose not to do so* you may be required to pay a fee and file a formal variance application in the future if you ever plan to do any building on the property. There is no fee for havlr this automatic variance recorded at this time. • ‘3. If your Record Lot consists of two or more separate tax parcels* a green form for requesting a combined assessment is enclosed. Pleas sign and return this to the City to allow your tax records to be changed into one parcel consistent with the zoning and to assure the most favorable tax rate possible. A. A conditional use permit Issued by the City Council is required for certain land uses in the RS District* Including the following residential uses: a) If you use or hove used your cabin FOR MORE THAH 180 DAYS/YEAR. b) If you have MORE THAN ONE CABIN on your property. Refer to the enclosed yellow sheet for a definition of these uses including a description of when a special permit is or is not requ. If you wish to apply for a permit* mark the yellow page and return to the City. We will send you the cpproprlate application form by return mall. A postage-paid envelope is enclosed for your use in returning the above forms to the City. If you have any questions about .this* please call Alan Olson or Jeanne Mabusth at A73-7357. On behalf of the City Council and Planning Commission* I want to take this opportunity to thank each and everyone of you whose interest and participation this past year has helped so much in the completion of this planning process. I have certainly enjoyed meeting all of you and learning so much about your Island. I hope this last step can be kept as- simple as possible so that your property rights can be correctly recorded for your future benefit. Sincerely * .'Alan r. Olson City Planner Enclosures © CITY of ORON Post Office Box 66*Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ORDINANCE NO. 246 RS SEASONAL REcPiATIONAL ZONING OFFIC^^gCOra_WT_NOTICE FEBRUARY 15, 1983 ^is notice Is provided to the owner/taxpayer of record according to Ordinance ff246. Section 34.336. The following Record Lot classification will be considered accurate dispute the facts used to make the classification. eJ!? Hr**® granting of automatic lot area variancesthat Grandfather existing properties of less than 5 acres In area. RECORD LOT means all the contiguous or abutting land owned in common by the same person or persons as of November 9. 1981. (the effective date of the Island moratorium) or coTOon-ownershlp may occur thereafter. Including one or more separately platted lots or unplatted parcels of land, and/or one or more separately identified tax parcels. Because of the unique circumstances and actual use patterns existing on the islands, also included within the definition of a "Record Lot" Is commonly-owned land ^^»^t^J^^_contlgi^^ for being separated only by platted unopened public right-of-way. Record Lot #8 Georgia Ruud 13611 Valley View Rd Eden Prairie, MN 55344 This RECORD LOT consists of 1 as follows: tax parcel(s) 23-117-23 23 0028 MMOXXMRTE S»E 4.3 »CRES t CLASSIFICATIOm (ill# iu 4ixclu»iva of any wtlandt)________ ____^OVBR 10 ACRESp (nay be CVBDIVXDABLE) ____^OVER S ACRESp irv i LESS THa N 10 ACRES Y (confornlng but not 3US0IVI0ABLE) ^ StfBSTANDARD/BUILDABLE Cless than 5 acresi a new seasonal cabin nay be bulltp or a.n existing seasonal cabin nay be improvedp added-onto or replacedp subject to setbacKSp persiitsp etc.p but without requiring further City Council review) UNBIIILDABLB (neans s vacant lot of less than 1/2 sere I suy be used for recreational purposes without a cabinp but requires a Council approved i variance to be built on) EXISTING USE CLASSIFICATION X RECRSATIOHAL USE ONLY (without a Cabin) (at* thiS. tilU SEASONAL CABIN, used 110 days or less/year (if your cabin is used mce than 110 days/ year, please coeplete the YELLOW application) .Seasonal Cabin plus a PRIVATE CUEST CABIN Other CONDITIONAL USE PLEASE VERIFY THE ACCURACY 0F"tHE ABOVE INFORMATION. If there^ls an error or a changeT please mark the correction and return this page to the City In the enclosed postage- paid envelope. Wc want this permanent record to be correct. IF YOU WISH TO CHALLENGE THE RECORD LOT DETERMINATION AND/OR THE CLASSIFICATION OF YOUR PROPERTY, you must file a formal written appeal before July 1, 1983 , or the record lot will remain classified as above. Sign below and return along with a separate letter stating the problem and facts supporting any change. Additional Information may be requested to verify any challenge such as surveys, utility bills, copies of recorded deeds, etc. Owner/Taxpayer Date Phone DEEHINO ZSLAStD INSERT OFFICIAL RECORD LOT HAP ORDIMANCB NO. 246 • DBCEMOBR 30. 1902 ns SCASOtlAL RCCnKATIONAL ZONING DXSTniCT NOT TO SCALE MXNtirrotixA ntAa: roniT ECdCATfos potmr CIWV!< roiKT i City of 0R0]>?0 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L NO. _______________d: APPROVING A LOT AREA VARIANCE FOR RECORD LOT NO B PORSOANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 246, MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31 Minnesota: BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Hennepin County FINDINGS 1.That _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ is (are) the owner(s)/tax payer(s) of record of the following described property located with! the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District of the City: For the legal description, see Exhibit A. 2.That in adoption of Ordinance No. 246, the City Council reviewe ownership, development and use patterns on the islands and has deter mined that all the above described property combined is and shal hereinafter and henceforth be one "RECORD LOT" as defined in Sectio 10.31 of said ordinance. 3.That all the above described property when combined as one RECORD LO is still less than the minimum lot size required for new lots in th RS District, but that this RECORD LOT is being used and/or may be use in the future for any permitted use in the RS District without advers affect upon public health, safety, or welfare. CONCLUSION The City Council of Orono hereby grants a lot area variance t the above described RECORD LOT based on the above findings and subject t ^ the following conditions: 1.This RECORD LOT including all the above described property combine shall henceforth be continued in common ownership by the same perse or persons even if recorded as separate lots or tax parcels, and 5 shall not be subdivided, sold in parts, reduced in area or otherwif separated without application for and approval of a subdivision by th City. This condition shall not preclude future sale or transfer c the complete "RECORD LOT" as a single unit. 2.Granting this variance means this RECORD LOT may be used for one family seasonal recreational use without a structure; or a single ne seasonal dwelling may be built; or an existing seasonal dwelling we be used, improved, added-onto or replaced; all without requirxr. further City Council review of lot size, but subject to strict coir pliance with all building permit, setback, hardcover, on-site sewac treatment and other performance standards for development in the I District. Exhibit A. That part of Lot B, Morse Island Park, lying south of a line running from a point 554 feet south of the northwest corner of lot B, to the northwest corner of Lot 38, Hennepin County, Minnesota TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE:March 4,1999 SUBJECT: #2465 Robert D. Erickson 364/372 Westlake Street Lot Line Rearrangement Zoning District: LR-IA Lot Area: (Existing) One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre) 364 Westlake St. 372 Westlake St. 0.65 acre 2.01 acres Background: fr Application: The Planning Commission reviewed the Sketch Plan (Zoning Application #2436) for the proposed Lot Line Rearrangement on November 16, 1998. The minutes have been attached. The current plan has changed slightly from the Sketch Plan reviewed by the Planning Commission in November. The lot line has been reconfigured. Please review the site plans (Exhibits H and I). The applicant has proposed a lot line rearrangement for properties located at 364 and 372 Westlake Street. The applicant has recently purchased the lots and intends tc build on one lot. The second lot is intended to be sold. The proposed lot line rearrangement would create two substandard lots. The 364 lot would be 1.46 acres (63,783 s.f.), and the 372 lot would be 1.21 acres (52,840 s.f). The LR-1A zoning district requires 2 acres for each lot. Both lots have been assessed and provided a samtary sewer unit. The 364 property has been connected, whereas, the 372 property has not. The 372 property contains n\o rental cabins and a principal residential structure. The lot was assessed for only one sewer unit although it does contain the three separate "dwelling units". _____ Pertinent Ordinances: • Section 10.03, Subd. 6: Existing lot of record: In "R" Districts of greater than one acre and served by public sanitary sewer. A lot of record in any "R" District in the City in excess of one acre, which does not meet the requirements of this zoning chapter as to area or width !^24S6 Robtrt D Erickson 364/372 WisilakcSimt Lot Line Rearrangement 3/15/99 Page 1 oiJy, may be utilized for single family detached dwelling purposes if the Council finds: (a) It is a • 'east one acre in size, and the average width of the lot is at least 100 feet; (b) It is served by public sanitary sewer; (c) It otherwise meets the requirements of this chapter or otiier applicable City Code provisions. This portion of the zoning code does not apply in this case as it only applies to lots existing prior to January 1,1975. The lot line rearrangement would create two new lots. Section 11.30, Subd. 5(C): Front - Back Lot Subdivisions: The proposal as designed would create a front and back lot subdivision. The definition of "back lot" per Section 10.02 and Section 11.03, Subd. 2 is a "a lot typically separated from a public or private road by another lot and which gains access to the public or private road via a narrow corridor. Such a separated lot is considered to be a 'back lot' when the corridor is platted as an outlot. A separated lot is considered to a be a "flag lot" when the corridor is platted as part of the lot. When the corridor is merely an easement over another lot, the separated lot is considered to be an 'easement back lof." Section 1130, Subd. 5(Q states that flag lots and easement back lots as defined in this chanter shall not he created. Therefore, the proposed lot line rearrangement must make use of an outlot or maintain the 50' width at the street to be considered a lot line rearrangement. Section 11.10, Subd. 14(A): Zoning Regulations. Every plat shall conform to existing zoning regulations and subdivision regulations applicable at the time of Final Plat approval. Variances shall not be approved to increase the overall subdivision density above the minimum lot area requirements of the applicable zoning district and this chapter. PertineDt Facts 1.The property at 372 Westlake Street originally consisted of three lots that have been combined for tax purposes. Lot 10 = 0.62 acre Lot 11= 0.86 acre Lot 12 = 0.53 acre Total 2.01 acres 2. 3. The property is zoned LR-1A requiring 2.0 acres. This is a conforming lot. The property at 364 Westlake Street is 0.65 acres. It is non-conforming. The lot line rearr<mgement, as proposed by the applicant, would create two non-conforming lots. ^2436 Robert D Erickson 364/372 lVgstlak€ Street Lot Line Rearrangemeni 3/13/99 Page! 4. 5. 6. Upon replatting of the properties, the applicant will remove the two residences, both rental cabins, and any other structures on the property. Both properties have been asses-'^d for one sewer unit each. The SAC fee has been ?ollected on the 364 lot and it has been connected to san«taiy sewer since 1994. The 372 lot was required to connect to sewer in 1995, but has not been. The property owner would be required to pay a SAC fee prior to connection. It was determined the lot would only be provided one unit despite the three dwelling units that exist on the property (one residence ard two rental cabins). It could be argued the subdivision could be a true lot line rearrangement if the 50' lot width were maintained at the street side of the 364 lot. The lot would be widened closer to the lake.shore. If the lot line rearrangement woiUd occur variances would be required for lot size to create buildable lots. 7.The applicant intends to have all structures on both lots and the septic system from the 372 WestMe Street property removed and new homes constructed. Both lots would require variances as the zoning district requires a minimum of 2.0 acres dry for new construction. The Planning Commission should consider the possiblity of granting temporary variances to each lot. A variance from the Code requirement for lot area would allow both lots to be developed without further Plamiing Commission and City Council review. Lot Area and Yards ANALYSIS LR-IA (2 acre) Lot Area Lot Width Lakeside Yard Side Yard Street Yard Required 87,120 s.f. 200' 75*30'50' 364 63,783 s.f 50.00'75'30'50' 372 52,840 s.f.148.59 ’IS'30'50' ^24}$ Robert D. Erickson S64/S72 Westlake Street Lot Line Rearrangement 3/15/99 Page 3 Hardcover Westlake Street Lot Area Lot Area in 0-75' Setback Lot Area in 75-250'Setback Allowed Hardcover in 75-250' Setback 364 63,783 s.f.25,318 s.f.38,465 s.f 7,333 s.f yn 52,840 s.f.23,508 s.f.29,332 s.f 9,616.25 s.f Structural Coverage Property Total Lot Size - as proposed Total Structural Coverage Allowed 364 63,783 s.f 9,567.45 s.f 372 52,840 s.f 7,926 s.f Sewer Units Both properties have been assessed and provided with sewer units. 364 Westlake Street - Has paid SAC fee and connected to sanitary sewer in 1994. 372 Westlake Street - Has been assessed and provided one sewer unit. The lot has not been connected to sanitary sewer or paid a SAC fee. Access Both lots would gain access by private driveways, as they do today. The back lot would require creating a flag lot to gain access. The zoning code does not allow creation of flag lots. The proposed rearrangement maintains the existing 50' corridor to join the buildable portion of the lot to Westlake Street. The subdivision ordinance requires that any driveway be at least 10' from the side or rear property lines of adjacent lots. There is adequate spacing for the driveway arrangement on both lots. Easements Utility and Drainage easements shall be shown as 10’ along the exterior lot lines and 5’ on the internal lot lines. Any e. isting easements should be vacated along areas no longer serving as property lines. §2436 Robtn D. Erickson 364/372 WcutakiStrcMt Lot Line fUtirrangemenl S/13/99 Page 4 Screening The front/back !ot regulations require adequate screening between the front and back lots and along access routes to mitigate vehicular noise and lights. The proposed plan did not show how much screening currently exists or show how the screening may be improved. The applicant is encouraged to provide screening that will minimize the impact to the 372 Westlake Street property from the driveway for the northern lot. Right-Of-Way Westlake Street is a dead end street that does not have room to turn around without utilizing a driveway. The City should consider creating a cul-de-sac at the end of Westlake Street. The City could request the property owner dedicate a portion of his property to allow the cul-de-sac to be built. Staff and the applicant have researched this matter extensively, but no agreement has been established on how a cul-de-sac could work in this location. STAFF RECOMMENDATION • Staff is reconunending approval of the lot line rerjrangement as proposed on the survey, completed by Sunde Land Surveying, LLC, February 18, 1999 based on the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. The applicant shall grant easements, to be shown on the final survey, 10 feet along exterior property lines and 5 feet along interior property lines. All existing structures on both the 364 and 372 Westlake Street properties be removed prior to the filing of the lot line rearrangement Applicant shall apply for demolition permits from the City prior to removal of the houses or c abins. The on-site sewage treatment system located on the 372 lot be removed and the grade restored to the existing conditions shown on the survey. Grant variances on both lots for lot area to create buildable lots without requiring further Planning Commission or City Council review. 5. The 372 Westlake Street lot shall pay a SAC fee and connect to sanitary sewer. U2436 Robert D Erickson 364/S72 IVestlake Street Lot Line Rearrangement 3/13/99 Rage 5 Attachments A B C D E F G H 1 J K L M N Application Location Map Section Map Plat Map Sewer Map Site Topography Existing Survey Original Site Plan Current Site Plan Property Survey Lot Size Worksheet Planning Commission Minutes ~ 11/16/98 Permit Record — 364 Westlake Street Permit Record ~ 372 Westlake Street 'i ’ ! • q B2436 Robtrl D. Erickson 364/372 Wutlakt Street Lot Urn Rearrangement 3/13/99 Page 6 A Application U ^ Date Received" ^ / / 7 / ^ ? , 00 CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address S G Y ____________ Property Identification Number (PID) g.3 <s>g/<^___/f/t/fi >fA/i) 37^ UJBS'T^/ff<£3/ Please check one - Property abrtra« or Attach legal description to application?^ ^ torrens? 372. APPLICANT Name t>, E./e./c^so^ Address g y 7 'r-'OjOK^uJ/f- City ^>/ecA>0________ ___________Phone (home) H/0 ZipSgy<g Phone (work) ^ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ______ Address City Zip Phone (home) Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District 7^ Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______ PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes ^ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) ______ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites _________Existing Units New Units ' • Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) _ Units per___Acres _ Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) t CO « 2 E3Tr,’!V? • • • 4C0 oiiffnrA u BAT30C ;CHRBTi|t£ OR ORONO HI6H ed’. •w-lr.-v i- 'V J • i. .,Win imicK Ro fl 7 :'.- .^r-: @ 8C0 _ • • • •• ' '• EAST LA axoi ■->*•' 'ii.;;>VrS/ t ;^\i-:s(ubbs -.o t *ti-'*i '••■•:•••- .-'wV' 1' •••'i/• ^ ■■■ B,ryr i>»c-------- ^ BATS I lATS <9^* ' '■ 1*' •*.-••/‘r-r k. ^ • » • •«! • m i • . • *-4» . • • ''w ~ OAHl RP^V ^Forsst • » O •• •w« :^S.gav ;I0HNS PEERING ~ >\\ )V- •:.:. .>:: I ^‘.r-•, ^■v ■ v.«u.^ . a N ()<?) a • 457 : 3 c a ?Sr J5-<S^‘ (i3)R ft 6 (24)77 *'P 4rr d23> ? a ^223.5 0 N 3 223.5 : 9 '; S ^^3.5 : ^ K " I 13 ': '". 20.5 • ^ •, V Q M5 • \ ^f ict:* ..L’2: -7 ^',’7 ‘ 4-f^........^-r^T-^rV ^ ^<3^?r> 54.5 a ^ 537.01 •a: « ; (9)• 1 . 2 533.22 ! : (10) ;: 3, 1* ,2^ V-‘ \ 29» : 3 529. 43: ; 2* V •'a* n: 525.54 90 a (5 j^Y a* 66 ( 13) 6 :>g.:e a*' 67 P(|^■" ( 14) 7 5K. 77 ^ -• ^ «• 66 ;a (fg25 (15) « <?!»’ '; / 5<o.4o _... a.„.7j._/ ESJI' .( 16) » .. 506,70 -----2.------J ^ fli 60 ^ «(|7^(>i'0 / 489 1 f / 0 h«» 1 t . (>® *65.6 f Jr ^4 a k 'l J • 46^ 5^__ i - - - - -___* _ ______ .^1 1 ~ ' (1) %. 1?. H?. / 4I«A wa Ol/TwOT B Na9*M*4l'f 57116 * C4r< O^lQm •^.5 ..t*- r.T^«i5'4i*f \^sJ5- tx. A iS>K I s R C arier a (35) 4"S/8 1 AKf 8 fi)2 ‘ 0 ^ 5(23)8 « A 457 .N 8 8 o’• f}i. ^ T3 5j 8 8 [26) » 8 8 (25)^8 ^ V 19 2115 ® 215.3 ® 23^ LC 4 LLIT 20 »l(2l) a 540.8 ; 8 .N•537.01 1 8 ;(9)i S3122 ! 8 '* 291 1 529.43! 2^ X2.7 197.2 (10) 8 52164 A 8 167 !St 90 5 V 321.83 (30) 8 318.06• 03' 8 ms '^(28) a fl 201^ 15(27) CLAWOMT \ 213 5 -------- . / f ^ VI m 8 (14) ^ 514.27 —r~Zi S£ 88 M (15) e •2 1 . 310.46 •8 78 / VAC OCC NC 2^11665 -----^ T (') H ^ C3EICHTS « R L S , HO T*T \ 2?;^ \/(ni)*r’K\..A • A •. "%L 018) ^ ' 146.03 ' 'i X>****' . . 9 ..S3 73 ^S> ? XV / \ 936 / .1 935.9 938.4 938.5 940.9 939.4 937.8 1953.7r"r> Ui 9 \ 951.4 9^0 I I 5.4 95TT X 950.7 955.5 ^ n ^\' [\ ' • 1 ^ A \ \\V\ \ \ \\\ 1o r • 1 X 955.5 c 954.6 \vv\\9 1 m \ 1 ,' # . If/. \> 1 "N 9S0 //y 372 .Po 7 _o o c O •//■> O A O '^5 tt fCli aJ) O PRESENT SITE CONDITIONS SCALE-1*-4a-or CHANNEL EXHIBIT QMF - SITF PI AN '-QT A LQT, B AREA 46.189 S.F. 69.761 S.F. BUILDABLE 24.709 S.F. 48.756.5 S.F. PERMITTED STRUCTURAl PERMITTED HARDCOVER COVERAGE 75*-25Q‘ (25%) ENTIRE PARCEL (15%) PROPOSED COVERAGE 6.177.25 S.F. 10.989 S.F. 6.928.85 S.F. 10.464 S.F. 5.800 S.F. 10.769 S.F. EABCEL.TOTAL 115.950 S.F. 68.465.5 S.F. I7.II6.25 S.F.17.892.85 S.F.16.569 S.F. v-^ 1 1!; / /./ iijiiiyii I a I I / //.'/////// LAKE MINNETONKA (STUBBS BAY)•CA4JI I* • *o* aj ^ #2465 V-) ■LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR= ROBERT D. ERICKSON pm» *»«><■«. I^ •«»«*« iM «| •» «» Cmm* ^ pm* ^ !••• •« II M •! I »•» »•« ■* ^ ■^ •• •• *MI I i«* •• •» • \m% wm* 0 *% ♦• *| *. «• ••- - — mm »*i •• m, m»m** mpf rntm^mp m4 lai •• ••» mm m • ma mm-amt m|tii««1 mm»marn tamtt tmtttma mm m a mm mtmmrn m lammamta^ m ma »■■■>■ *• |l••Mt trn^ m mrnim •• mmtt at m mamma tam-m m OT mjmm »• ammrnma^m ma ^ mmma* •» mmmrnt Im«. mma% ma ••• •»••••• I • •« • •mtrna m »»'«• ttmt ta M mmarn •» mrnatm ma aaat m •mfmmf m tma ma m am mmmrna mmma mt • 0 m* M *m> *a mm tm mama* m Kma rnmmrnaa mm tma ma mma w—» Uam m ma mm^t m aaa \m matmt m m M atmamm •» mm^m* #» (ot« maaa ma -atm ma m ama \m f a mtm *tm ta ma taa* m xf • m *ma ma »a aa rnamama ■ Im» m ma •m •» CfTYOFOROt^O • am • ^mmn %ama tma^ ma^m m mma I I 1 (S?S5TCT"Tmn3M ammt % tat lap tma m n^35i^----------- LAKE MINNETONKA (STUBS'S BAY) ' M • M* S«3am•%»%am r* • Ml ••t H mms:is=^ «• t\IC 9mrnm mmrn ^ Hu tmrnm mma i7*'* *^7 Tjg am^ ^**** CS\ •H r«^ ma •3 6is3r**ir d* imamm Umm mm iX »■ ■■■■ \mmm mat >■■^■1 *mmt mat >»■ ■»!« mat mat //■ mm t) lw«ma 0iat M 0 ' ^•a'tt a maaatt at ttm amar m •M mmmat* ta mma m Utaaaam MMf ••••• M CMi « •••-««• •m mtmmt m mta mamma m atamaa ptm ta ma a I i-t ammam m aaa aamt m mt am rnmat mmam* m ttamt m -a m tatma a I %atat m ammt* *a • I #^1 •M mama amaa tma C • I IM mm Ca •». !••• i»-M |«i«i I mamrn*, « ataam m » imamrnt mam mimm maa m aaammaa a mm*t • mwam a a atma$ trn • m *t*t mma (•mam $ a aim m • m mma •tarn a tt^am a% m aa Ica* mama %aamt M MM *ma *mrn m MM ama%ma H tamt mam • I «M • paaaf mma mt mm amam •a,am maa0im — ma m mm maat u 9aam Itmm a amm mm pm0 •«« mmam n tarn 0 ammmt aamma m amm tarn M aam !«• fuaMtMM*** M ••«• fWMiv • tUM MM tTtjr •ta mat mam mtrnmta mm M •• mamma M m a aaa »» a m tarn mma »mtaa mm ••• mam M taaamm m **** •MM !•« UC *• -^5 at.% mam rnm^ am iWi Snade Laad Sarvaytagy IXC , IMM • *att ••* ■MM• ••• m-i aaa-atam y Sunde Land Surveying, llc. John K. Barnes, R.LS., ffnipA Mark S. Hanson. R.LS., PrincfBl Scott J. Soukup, R.LS., PrjKfal Edward H. Sunde, R.LS.. Associ:e February 19,1999 CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attention: Mr. Paul Weinberger Re: 98-248 LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR ROBERT D. ERICKSON Dear Mr. Weinberger: We have prepared a lot line rearrangement for Mr. Robert D. Erickson for the properties located at 364 and 372 Westlake Street. The following are the area calculations for proposed parcels A&B: 0-75 Feet 75-250 Feet Permitted HC Total PARCEL A 23,508 sq.ft. PARCEL B 25,318 sq.ft. 29,332 sq. ft. 38,465 sq. ft. 7,333 sq. ft. 9,616 sq. ft. 52,840 sq. ft 63,783 sq. ft. Note: The PERMITTED HC refers to the allowable hard cover area and is based on 25% of the area calculated from the 75 foot to the 250 foot setback. The setbacks are calculated from the ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK. Respectfully submitted, SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. John K. Barnes, R.L.S. Principal/President JKB/mjw/letter/98-248 9001 East Bloomlnjyton Freeway C35W) - Suite 118 • Bloominflton Minnesota 55420*3435 612/881*2455 • Fax: 612/888-9526 E-Mall: info@sunde.com I ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 16,1998 L (#2416/2417 TOLD Development, continued) Gaffron staled this application for amending the 6*5 District will proceed to the City Council on November 23 with the Planning Commission's recommendation. • • • • • • ••• ** •• Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, to table Application #2416, TOLD Development, Co., 2380 Shadywood Road. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. Berg Inquired whether Walgreens will stay at their proposed building size of 13,905. Cunningham staled the proposed size will probably stay at 13,905. SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS (#12) #2436 BOB ERICKSON, 364/372 WEST LAKE STREET, LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, 11:45 p.m. -12:10 p.m. Bob and Lisa Erickson was present. Weinberger staled the Applicant Is proposing a lot line rearrangement for properties located at 364 and 372 Westlake Street. The proposed lot line rearrangement would create two substandard lots with the 364 lot being comprised of 1.6 acres and the 372 lot being comprised of 1.1 acres. The LR-1A zoning district requires two acres for each lot. Currently the 364 lot is comprised of .65 acre and the 372 lot is 2.01 acres. Weinberger remarked that 364 Westlake contains a non-conforming structure which the Applicant is proposing to remove as well as the existing structures on 372 Westlake. Both properties have been assessed for one sewer unit each with Lot 364 having been connected to sanitary sewer since 1994. Lot 362 was required to connect to sewer in 1995, but to dale has not been. Staff is recommending that the Applicant maintain the 50 foot front lot line for the 364 property which would allow a movement of the lot line towards the lakeside of the property and make it a true lot line rearrangement. Weinberger noted with this lot line rearrangement it is being proposed to take the one conforming lot, Lot 372, and combine it with non-conforming Lot 364 to make two non-conforming lots. McMillan inquired whether a flag lot was being created. Weinberger stated a flag lot would be created under the definition of the code, which the zoning code does not allow. Weinberger remarked that if the 50 fool front lot line was maintained, then a flag lot would not be created because the lot line would change further back on the property. Van Zomercn noted this is a lot line rearrangement and not a subdivision, with access being kept the same. Variances for lot area may be lequired for a residence to be built on either lot. Van Zomeren staled a lot line rearrangement is a Class 1 Subdivision, which require Mylars to be filed at the County. Bob Erickson stated they may have reached a solution by leaving the existing 50 foot front lot line for the 364 property. The intent Is to construct a residence on both lots. Erickson requested that the Planning Commission approve the sketch plan as revised, keeping the 50 foot front lot line, which is not depicted on the diagram. Page 21 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 16,1998 9 (#2436 Bob Erickson, continued) Weinberger stated the plan was dropped off today, noting the building pads have not changed. Lindquist commented that the Applicant should try to avoid variances on new construction. • * • • • * • McMillan remarked th&t a variance to the average lakeshore setback will probably be needed because of the shape of the lot. Chair Smith Inquired whether there were any public comments. There were no public comments. Chair Smith stated the Applicant will need to provide for sotne turn-around. Smith noted that normally the Planning Commission does not give a recomrnendation on a sketch plan. McMillan inquired whether there would be a hardship that exists for the two non-conforming lots. Hawn suggested that one lot could be conforming and one lot non-conforming. Schroeder noted the Applicant was not able to obtain c nough land to make the lots conforming. Weinberger stated the Applicant has the option of appearing before the City Council or coming back before the Planning Commission with their preliminary plat. Gaffron remarked that this sketch plan application does not need to go before the City Council unless there is a problem with the application and that the Applicant can submit the preliminary plat to the Planning Commission for their review. (#13) #2441 MIKE HILBELINK FOR JOHN VOGT, 3020 WATERTOWN ROAD, SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, 12:10 p.m. -12:31 p.m. Mike Hilbelink was present. Van Zomeren stated the Applicant Is proposing to subdivide an existing 12 acre parcel into five parcels, noting that a survey Is needed to verify the wetland and dry land areas. Two lots are to be served by the existing curb cut off of Watertown Road and three lots are to be served by an extension of the cul-de-sac serving the Crystal Creek subdivision to the west of this parcel. Lot 7 in Crystal Creek does not have frontage on a platted road or oullot. Staff is not In favor of the road the way it Is proposed, and the size and location of the proposed ' cul-de-sac is not acceptable. The Applicant needs to provide a septic report and a stormwater management plan for review by the City Engineer and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Hilbelink stated some testing and field work has been performed, and discussions have been held with Mr. Winston, the owner of Lot 1. Hilbelink noted that the two bottom lots do not have adequate septic sites available and will need to be combined into one parcel. Van Zomeren noted that there would be 15 proposed lots on one cul-de-sac with this proposal. Van Zomeren slated she will need to review the City code to determine how many residences can be located on a cut-de-sac, the length allowed, and the required paved width. Page 22 Permit No, ^/V*? i9.2± ./9;iA AoC>0 IBJJ?-. (nZ)9U 95C-tJ PERMIT RECORD Date 9- /o - jry //- /C-9-1,9' 6,-S-<o9' '7-A 4- ^ -_^j 9 <V. n-H-9L- !A Type of Permit ACb\(XM ocz>^ul J^JjAACiC^IL^ /Ltyvk. t S RC -;^U:C:T^-L\J6fe^ .v^ti ^ Pj^h^<r 'fO * t, Permit No', 6^r>^n "7 /6s~9 2^^ <3751 uii^^JijyJ^SL. -XJ-. PERHIT RECORD Date >.a^-g-/o /- <?•- 70 s.o-L^ 9'bO '94 Type of Permit - JiUxi£JJ^SLfk 'pCl^.Sl COcuJti^ . I Date of Application/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 120 day limit: 6/17/99 TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: RE: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/ Zoning Administrator March 2,1999 #2466 John B. Winston/James R. Renckens, having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road Class II Subdivision —Two Lot Preliminary Subdivision Exhibits: A1 Application AA Notice to previous applicants A2 Legal Description AC Septic Report A3 Applicant's lette AD Previous Proposed Plat B Proposed Plat Survey BA Historical Information C Area Map Ca Road and Topo for Crystal Creek Cl Plat Map Cb Res. #2948 C2 &3 Mailing List Cc Exhibit A for Res. #2498 Cd Staff Report for Crystal Creek Ce Engineer’s letter Cf Res. #3896 RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Rural Service/Rural Residential District Zoning District: Comprehensive Plan: Lot Area: 11.94 acres total, 10.1 dry acres U2466 Winston/Renckens 3020 Watertown Road PC-3/15/99 page-1 Date of Application/! 7/99 Date Complete • 2/17/99 120 day limit: 6/17/99 Proposed Lots; Lot Total acreage Total dry acreage Loti 8.43 acres 7.30 acres Lot 2 3.51 acres 2.73 acres Application: The applicants are proposing to subdivide an 11.94 acre parcel into two lots. Lot 1 is considered a flag lot, subject to back lot standards. Lot 2 is a front lot. Both lots 1 and 2 are proposed to have access onto Watertown Road. RR-IB Standards Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Street 2 acres dry buildable 200’50'50 ’30’50 ’ Back Lot Standards Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Street 3 acres 200’75’75’45’75’ The proposed subdivision is located in the RRl-B zoning district. The minimum lot area for the zoning district is 2 acres. Backlots require a minimum of 3 acres. Lot 1 is a flag lot back lot. Lot 1 is required to meet the above back lot standards which are 150% of the requirements for the RR- 1 B district for lot area, front, rear and side yards. §2466 Winston/Renckens 3020 Watertown Road PC-3/15/99 page-2 Date of Application/17/99 Date Complete. 2/17/99 120 day limit: 6/17/99 The subdivision ordinance states that front/back lot subdivisions shall not be created. In Section 11.31, Subd. 5, it states "Front/back lot subdivisions. "Flag lots” and "easement back lots" shall not be created. Front/back lot divisions shall be allowed only in conjunction with the creation of an outlot to provide access from the back lot to the public or private road. Such outlot shall not be allowed as creditable lot area for either the back or front lots. Front/back lots shall adliere to the following standards: a. Front^ack lot divisions may be used when existing property dimensions are narrow and deep, such that lot width does not allow for a side-by-side lot split, but acreage is adequate to provide a front lot and back lot without requiring an area variance when the area of the outlot access corridor is excluded. The area to be subdivided is 11.94 acres with 1.91 acres wet. There is sufficient land area for 5 building sites in the 2 acre zoning district. The parcel, however , does not have 1,000ft. of frontage for 5 lots to meet the minimum lot width on a public street. The depth of the parcel is 1,170 ft. which would provide adequate lot width if the lots were platted in an east/west orientation. However, a new private north/south road platted at 50* right-of-way would be required along the east or west boundary line. The amount of lot area dedicated to a private road would reduce the total number of building sites and would cause either the lots in either Crystal Creek or along Wear Lane to technically become through lots. There are also not enough adequate primary and secondary septic sites to accommodate such a platting arrangement. b.Front/back lot divisions may be used for individual lot splits, but may not be used when subdividing a large parcel into numerous lots if creation of a back lot is merely a convenience to the developer rather than supported by unique site factors. The topography and location of the wetlands reduces the likelihood of a three or four lot .<■ .bdivision laid out along a north/south private road. A back lot/front lot for this parcel may be accomplished without lot area variances. Lot 2 cannot be flirt' er subdivided. Lot 1 could be further subdivided ij adequate septic sites n-.d access is provided in accordance with City codes. #2466 }V: Mon/Renckens 3020 Watertown Road PC-3/15/99 page-3 Date ofApplication/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 120 day limit: 6/17/99Accessory Structures “axhnum .oal squarelot coverage as calculated by staff. The actual m 7 s‘™'h<res total 338 square feet ofneeds to be verified. If the lot coverage exceeds 3 200 s^ “''*'*80 of the accessory structures be removed to meet the requirement or a variance “n. -1.r^ui^ to te filed in a covenant in the cto o/tW^'-^ire nTT"'”"’7'' *at arethe side yard adjacent to street (dST setback if the w n 7 “ »0“'<l not comply withrequired by the subdivision ordinancr “ » 30' access outH asHistorical BuildingWatertLtRoadlS^"^m^ORc*29ta^ Historical Office notes a bam at 3020la included in Exhibit BA. “■ ^tn-cture inventory. The state informalSeptic SystemsPark Dedication Fee cs ss-r - .proposal and determine the fair market value of the mdevelofedH2466 Winston/Renckens 3020 Watertown Road PC-3/15/99 page~4 Date of Application/17/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 120 day limit: 6/17/99 Engineering Issues The City Engineer has provided a letter addressing several engineering issues such as access, stormwater management, grading and drainage for the previous 3 lot subdivision. He is reviewing the two-lot proposal. Dedication of Right-of-way Access to both lots is from Watertown Road. The south 33' of the parcel should be dedicated as right-of-way on the final plat. Access The City's subdivision ordinance limits the length of a cul-de-sac to 1,000 feet and the number of units to be served at 10. Crystal Creek Road was built with a temporary cul-de-sac to serve 11 properties at a length of 1,400 feet. Therefore, this parcel cannot gain access from Crystal Creek Road. Both lots are proposed to have frontage and access from Watertown Road. The Code requires that the 30 ’ portion of the back lot, Lot 1, be platted as an outlot, 30' wide, with a driveway at least 10' from ei^er lot line. The side yard adjacent to an access lot standard is 45' rather than 30'. Future access to an additional lot created from the back lot would also be required to be provided from the access outlot. No access from Crystal Creek Road shall be allowed. Cul-de-sacs The subdivision ordinance states that cul-de-sacs shall be discouraged. (Section 11.32, Subd. 2, B. 6). Proposed roadways shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be subdivided, unless prevented by topography or other physical conditions or unless in the opinion of the City such extension is not necessary or desirable for the coordination of the layout of the subdivision with the existing layout or the most advantageous future development of future tracts. This parcel is adjacent to the cul-de-sac for Crystal Creek. In considering this two lot subdivision, the Planning Commission and City Council should address whether a 50'outlot shall be required across the rear of Lot I in order to coordinate the layout of adjacent subdivisions. U2466 Winston/Renckens 3020 Watertown Road PC-3/15/99 page-5 Date of Application/1 7/99 Date Complete: 2/17/99 120 day limit: 6/17/99 Construction of Roads The subdivision ordinance states that the arrangement of streets shall provide for continuation of streets between adjacent properties when such continuation is necessary for convenient movement of traffic, effective fire protection, for efficient provision of utilities and where such continuation is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If the adjacent property is undeveloped and the street must be a dead-end street temporarily, the right-of-way shall be extended to the property line. The City may limit the length of temporary dead-end streets in accordance with the design standards. It was anticipated that Crystal Creek Road would eventually be connected to Wear Lane, according to a recent discussion with Jeanne Mabusth, former Zoning Administrator/Building Official (See Crystal Creek packet for staff reports and resolutions). Stormwater Management % The City Engineer is reviewing the subdivision for stormwater management concerns. Drainage and Utility Easements The City will require the subdivider to provide standard utility and drainage easements along the internal and external lot lines. Drainage and flowage easements will also be required for wetland protection. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission needs to discuss the following issues: 1. Whether to accept platting of a back lot given the width of the parcel, wetlands, topography, and access 2. The proposed access to the back lot via a flag lot configuration vs. the Code requirement for a 30' access outlot 3. Future possible subdivision of Lot 1 and future access to the lot 4. The Code ’s requirement to consider the adjacent subdivisions and the need to create a 50’ outlot across the rear of Lot 1 tf2466 Winston/Renckens 3020 Watertown Road PC-3/15/99 page-6 JL/ttiC IVCVCIVCU _________ Amount Paid *?flDr A, CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION wUTEgrc)v//vJ mAn PropertyIdendficatioaNumber(PID) 33 lift 33 33 QOOl Please check one - Property ____abstract or____torrens? Attach legal description to application. r\wiA/^<yJ City uM-i-o .T-ng Zip Phone (hope) ^>40^ "Xy -M PhoneYwoik> 3M ) " 0 O ......... .............. ^Ct\N 66^-icn- OWNERCifdifTerent than applicant) ‘ __^ Mom. n.\ a^C)(^N£ MbSio -fO/lg>TVl]EW LA^y£_‘ City pL.V/XNQiA’tV^ , (attach list if more than one) 0» Phone (home) Zip iPhone (work) ^ I EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) J y^.03 Acres Dry Land /*^~j ~ Acres Wet Land f. 44 Acres Total, all parcels 2<____ Residential; no. of unity ___/ Other (specify)_________ IL Present Zoning District PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) V Subdivision for New Building Sites j_____Existing Units __Nev/Units Total Units Number of Building Sites I Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) ___Units per j[^ Acres ____Sq. Ft Ehy Buildable Land X Residential ___ Other (specify), _______'ffc EXHreiTA (Entire Tract) That part of the South 1170 feet, as measured along the West line thereof, of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 118, Range 23, lying East of the West 869 feet thereof, as measured along the South line thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to Watertown Road. A WINSTON LAW OFFICE A February 16, 1999 RY MESSENGER qYYX uir OrtCNO Elizabeth Van Zomeren City Plaimer/Zoning Administrator Orono City Hall 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: James R. Renckens' Application for Two-Lot Subdivision; 3020 Watertown Roaci Dear Liz: Enclosed are our application for a two-lot subdivision of 3020 Watertown Road, a check in the amount of $350.00 to pay the subdivision ^plication fee, and a legal description to the entire tract. The preliminary plat and reductions thereof are ceding from Mark Gronberg. They will be delivered to your office by Mark's office. You already have the septic/drain field information from the prior application (No. 2449), and you should a\so have the address list from that prior application. If there is anything more you need from me, please call. I will plan on appearing before the Planning Commission on Monday, March 15, 1999. Thank you for your help. JBW:lms Enclosure cc: Jim Renckens (448-7788) r<^ ■ m • 0 . « 4420 IDS Cfnter, 80 SoutK 8lK Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel: 612/341-9800 Fax: 612/338-6351 i* ■’-V < .* Y\ *• *- •~* •//^• ■1 OUTLOT A \ N 89*50*y)d** E i\%/ \\ ,!.: >-------- O \ -< S \ ........................ 45 I t • i N'?—_,«;---vlW'" '- i( / V'r- \ Vj \ \ ^ J A ' Wi! / / \ \ / / > X /if—p:o II 4^ ury'•! X\^/xX ,V V. A^\Ah‘d.' / /I }/ N[ IK" fo .... <^xu/*} IW "“X • \\ \ t'■- ,/ y k ' [ '-4 » \V'; •A 11' A^%,. X\ 1V / ,h w * r \ \ \r^. A y-\N r d\ W STm ■\ > oo L_7>itf’i|R--k I I "V' > \ M 'X V-.. \A/Al \ N X. _____________________ _____7-j-~--~--r!?tr~~ SVV^ ” - K _ ^ N e»*j4* ij-* f vvaI'c.iV! r»Vi'.v ■ -^ ^ssBtr House ■H -r ^^ n —5 > 52 CO ^ 5 2 f Ss 2 \ 00 CO o ^ _ o o O ^C ^ • CO2 c “/ CO "Jn S •■" 3 mi S Id 2 C32900 CO c^ rn -th o ^ -p- o H I ;c 00 1 N3 U SITE cO a::: ,r«»N |«»M< C\i W*i CO « mi o).i I * * X ** s® j -- . mk ii t¥Amrrom *r5saj®n4o'« !»•< MV #»•c ^vr P' n M •W.i*IX.«I 4S*m Hi n fi i ; \ i 1 « in *i ■1 cm o RUN DATE 12/14/9S BATCH SAB PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 5S 'SS-118-2S 55 DOIAO CRYSTAI^EEK RD CRYSTAL CREBir LAND LLC CRYSTALJBREEK LAND LLC 601 CAl(LSON PKWY R200 HlNffETONKA HN 55505 50 35-118-25 55 0012 00058 ADDRESS.pending CRYSTAL CREEK HONEOWNERS CRYSTAL CREEK HOHEOWNERS 1802 WOODDALE dr WOODBURY HN 55125 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SVSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 58 55-118-25 55< 0010 00140 CRYSTAL CREEK RO CRYSTAL atUK LAND LLC CRYSTAb^REEK LAND LLC OOl^RLSON PKWY R200 HXNNETONKA HN 55505 58 53-110-25 54 0001 00185 OLD CRYSTAL.BAY RD N L S STUBBS ETAL LnWN SHERWOOD STUBBS 185 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD H LONG LAKE HN 55556 REPORT NO. PZ4S5401 PAGE 12 • 55-118-25 55 0011 00170 CRYSTAL-CREEK RO PILLAR HONES INC PILLAR NOHES INC 420 UPLAND LA N PLYHOUTN HN 55447 38 53-118-23 34 0005 00085 WEAR LA N H P A 6 H SIEVERT HICHAEL P 8 GAYLE H SIEVERT 85 HEAR U N LONG LAKE HN 55556 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 38 33-118-23 54 0006 00055 HEAR LA N DIANA J GROSS DIANA J GROSS 55 HEAR LA-N LONG LAKE HN 55356 CiADD [L^pV> HN 56‘jo^. 1S1-W sa 33-11S-2S 34 0013 00155 WEAR LA N J B WINSTON ICR WERSAL J B WINSTON ICR WERSAL 155 WEAR LA N LONO LAKE HN 55356 ' TOTAL BATCH 505 00026 Skv<- fivniu- 36 Cm M Utj--iu =tt: I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE . REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHEHT OF PROPERTY JKXkJlOH, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE •7^ IaK f^fsi o RUN DATE 12/14/98 batch 505PROP ADDRonner name taxpayerNAHE/ADORPROP ADDR OWNER NAHE taxpayer NANE/ADOR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME taxpayer NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME taxpayer NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE taxpayer NAHE/ADOR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE taxpayer NAHE/ADDR 38 04-117-25 21 000102985 WATERTOWN RD toil BAURLE / THOMAS D A LOUANN BAURLE 2985 WATERTOWN RO LONG LAKE HN 5555538 04-117-23 22 001600060 CYGNET PL D * M CURRIER JR > DONALD 8 MARGARET CURRIER 60 CYGNET PLACE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0030 03015 WATERTOWN RD GEORGAYN C KRAMER . GEORGAYN C KRAMER ' 2990 SOMERSET LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 31 0007 ««w i„” nT long lake MN 55356 38 33-118-23 32 0004 00195 CRYSTAL CREEK RD CRYSTAL CREEK LAND LLC CRYSTAL CREEK LAND LLC 601 CARLSON PKWY R200 ^ MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 33-118-23 33 0006 5“!?.. CPCCW RO- »NO LLC ^ f 8200 ' 55305 38 04-117-23 21 0010 02995 WATERTOWN^ GEORGAYN C MAM eR CEORGAYND'I^HER ^ 2998 SOMERSET LA LONG^AKE MN 55356 ” ,”-112-23 22 0024 00020 CYGNET PL • M M PANUSKA ' long lake MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0032 03085 WATERTOWN RD 8 J ULSETH ADD ULSETH STEVEN J ULSETH " 3085 WATERTOWN RO / long lake MN 55356 ” ^”-ll®-23 31 0011 0O265 OLD CRYSIArtAY RO N SCOTT K OJMdfSHITH ^ 0“M!RYSTAL bay RD N LONGXAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 REPORT MO. PI435401page 1138 04-117-23 21 0016 ®,®”® address UNASSIGNEO f®2STAL BAY RD ASSOC ROBERT a«RE /1600 LONG LAKE BLVD ORONO MN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0028 03045 WATERTOWN RO 3045 WATERTOWN RD ORONO HN 55356 38 04-117-23 22 0034 3085 WATERTOWN RO Long lake mn 55356 38 33-118-23 32 OOO; ”1«S . CRYSTALCRET k RO ®*Jf2AL CREEKx^ lLC crystal CJIEEK land LLC / PKWY R200 MINJIBfONKA HN 55305 PROPOtth 38 33-lia-:r3 33 0001 03020 WATERTOWN RO *H®BS ET AL W/L EST RENA N STUBBS 3020 WATERTOWN RO LONG LAKE MN 55356 601 CAmON PKWY B200 MINNETONKA HN 55305 38 33-118-23 33 0008 . CRYSTAL CKEK RD CRYSTAL CREEK,.«](m LLC ‘•‘■C /601 CAfkiON PKWY 8200 ' NINNEI^A mn 55305 AppWlbh/ 1 r\fcrma-h tfn k iA*rki k . I A^ CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #2449 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 1/20/99 TO: Mike Hilbelink 85 Golden View Dr, Long Lake, MN 55356 John Vogt 2755 Copper View Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION: COPIES TO: Alan Carlson Charles Cudd Co. Jerry & Lorraine Goodwald John Winston Mark & Laura Summers Steve Kahler Rick Carlson Mark Supalla Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 1/19/99 VOTE:5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions. Dale Lindquist moved to approve with conditions; 1 . There is to be an outlot 50' wide along the north edge of the parcel with a cul-de-sac platted at 100*. 2. 3. 4. Accessory structures will be removed. The historical significance of the structure listed on the state's inventory will be researched by the City Planner. Variance to allow the septic site for Lot 3 to be located 58' from the stormwater pond instead of 75' is acceptable. Park dedication fee to be determined. 5. Drainage issues to be addressed as noted by City Engineer's letter. 6. Applicant to work with the homeowner's association to use the private road as it exists. 7. 8. 9. Rearrange the lot lines to address the required lot area and lot widths. Move the temporary cul-de-sac to serve all three lots. Stormwater management plan - work with Watershed District and address City Engineer's concerns. A^ USSION dwald irs HJiT INST iTOlJlwl WIW intira de-sac Licture pond as It City due Liz Van Zomeren, Ci.y Planner/Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman. On-Site Systems Manager December 30, 1998 SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2449, Rena Stubb P ropeity - Subdivision The proposed three lot subdivision requires th? ...f. nr evaluation/design has been completed for Drimarv « rt sewage treatment systems. Site proposed septic systems meet City and State ^^ds. drainfield sites on each lot. AH *eSwbbproi^ityStapaaS«lj«entto Stubb property one proposed drainHeld site o^flot 3 wilftess f™"* ">« frc“£rrs':.*r.s^ i""" »■ arabdield sites to be fenced off priorr““g^t~^^^^^^^^ rom the we use of H issbricaL'^a ■JAH.29.1939 3:3lPt1 tUJ HISTOPICi^ SOC n<:i.093 P.1/7 ^/fTNNEsoTA Historical Society STATE Historic Preservation Office 345 KEILOGG BLVD. WEST ♦ ST. PAUL, MN 55102-1906 fax transmission number TO:\)rh fax NUMBER: ^'73-05(0 FROM: PHONE NUMBER: (651) iNOTES: BK IF YOU D n CHECK HERE IF ORIGINAL TO FOLLOU' BY MAIL O NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES. PLEASE CONTACT: (651) 296-5434 JhN.29. 19*?'? 35 31PM MM HISTORICAL S<X MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE-HISTORY INVENTORY FORM ^ t»5.09i jOO P.2/7 • thp-NTTFICATION HISTORIC NAME: Gable bern CURRENT NAME; Rena Stubbs Barn COUNTY; Hennepin CITY/TWP; Orono PROPERTY ID NUMBER; ADDRESS: 3020 Watertown Road INVENTORY NUMBER; HE-ORC-049 SHPO/106 NUMBER; field NUMBER: 2713B-314/T-21 SEl/4, SWl/4, SWl/4 SECTION; 33 TOWNSHIP: 118N RANGE: 23W UTM: ZlS E4S2660 N4980580 USGS QUAD; Excelsior 1958 (Revised 1993) np.SCRTPTiQN CONSTRUCTION DATE; Circa 1900 ORIGINAL USE; Barn CURRENT USE: Storage STYLE/INFLUENCE: Vernacular RESOURCE TYPE; Bam BUILDER/CONTRACTOR: UnJcnown ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Unknown MATERIALS:PDN: Unknown ROOF: Metal CLADDING: Vertical and diagonal siding STORIES: 1 1/2 ROOF SHAPE: Gable GROUND PLAN; Rectangular FACADE ARRANGEMENT: Asynan NUMBER OF BAYS; Poor; floor PLAN: ORIENTATION: Central axis north/south WINDOWS; INTEGRITY: Excellent: Good; X Fair: RELATED OUTBUILDINGS: There eve several buildings on this property, including a house and several outbuildings, RELATION OF PROPERTY TO SURROUNDINGS: The property is Jutt north of Watertown Road and the barn faces the road. :n«c!^n“s‘:udTltWUg n‘a/:ro*d £lx,d window, '1^6 Ught, «ch <»ooo lTgh« .to broken). There “//Ilf first level and a hay hood and hay doors on the second level, elevation has four fixed windows with 6 lights each and one door. ^ noJ^eirelevaclon feature, a sliding door on the first level end one fixed window with 2 lights in the gable peak. , V-’ 1 ,0 ujl'?-'* rU'M V i ■ Jrtl.29.1939 3:31PM Mil HISTORICi^ SOC M«:».0*32 P.3/7 ADDRESS: 3020 Watertown Road HISTORIC NAME: Gable Bam FIELD NUMBER: 2713B-314/T-21 INVENTORY NUMBER: HE-ORC-049 bh FWAtJIATIOW AND ANALYSIS HISTORIC CONTEXT: Railroads and Agricultural Development, 1870-1940. _ _ «__ _ _ _ _ _ _ HISTORICAL NARRATIVE; Farming has been the basis of *'^The”*^ since the arrival of Euroamerican settlers In the 1850s and 1 • ifl7n_ nroducSon S wSeat for urban markets dominated agricult^e through the 1870s. Sith a mixed pattern of general farming and dairying gradually coming pronlncnco around tli6 turn of the century. p«ter« »nd property type dovelopmepr. Ic agnlfleant »s t now rare exampU of a onco-common Important architect type. eligible for the national REGISTER; yes; District: jjqj’ Individual; Need Info.: X On Register: Contributing: Non-Contributing; level of significance: Local:State:National: nnCUMENTATTQN/NOTES 1995 Srlfc^Final^CuIcural Resources Reconnaissance S.P. 2713/1602. Hem,epln and fcTighC Conntie*. Minnesota Department of Transportation. Copy on file. Sta Preservation Office, Minnesota Historical Society. MAPfSl uses QUAD: Excelsior 1958 (Revised 1993) Form Prepared By: Shawna K. Gibson Date: October 1994 Cirysl Ci^ck I nformc^ort Cb- Cc - Ct>- ftpo^ ce- cf - |2oA4l pkin Res. '**’ 2fWS plM- ^'h lerte,- ^ oaI lUsof^htfyt ^ ,'t/r • ••••••lit ****« * ^ ^ • tmm «M • m W •«••«•••• «»•« ^ «■* ■ MJtx: r, txrris; • |«^ES3r£=?.ii.*r“*«- • fezrrz:--- • • • m\z SI HICI>' ^ , 0(JND''J ________- s:W^-“!i - V------------^>-^*1 ■ • / • • • ( • / • • 71 rm ‘I see «co)’<OM«i Noies «M0 octa «.s on sxeT c) ‘vi•*?• *'UA ■?“-y^W:.'v\ *C ';\'k^^ 'ISA \ \ V :-V',v» \AJU*-f............... / WATERTO' ■ lO*■«t •i *•Mi OT • a Mi MB • a M OT m %•ia *M m m m a iM ap* »«• ■• »*M> mmm m*$Mi mm m a tm mm ■ »•■ * «PW ■ <s •J* mm ^M0' ^ \. <. ///-/ u?->.y'"o /r'ry< L< " n ^ / Ot-Z3 I J« c?l uru'ii^y «: ' V. IAjf JWm « ••• ticSSr.SSii.'g.T ••««■.»■ > ■■■ ■ >■■■»■ ••mm *** ^ • m»>* !r« «r -* - -~*** 3 I •==>'*^=lv!r V T £s>- m» MM «••«'. Tr m'pm'mM “ «B • mm* 9 « m «i«M» , 1 CmTM. CM* T.r* CMNC ^UM «; a 'A«i t CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948_ _ _ _ _ A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED CRYSTAL CREEK FLAT FILE NO. 1457 HHEREASv Alan G. Carlson (hereinafter "the subdivider”) on March 22f 1991 filed a revised formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a 12-lot residential plat of property legally described as follows: Exhibit A, attached, (hereinafter "the property") and; WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on March 18, 1991 and March 20, 1991 and the Council on April 8, 1991 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on April 8, 1991, the Orono City Council considered the amended subdivision application of 12 lots, noting the following findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of •contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The subdivision as.amended from the original 16-lot proposal finds that each lot meets or exceeds the 2-acre minimum dry contiguous lot area standards. • 3. Each of the 12 lots meets the required lot width to the rear of the 50' front street setback line. Page 1 of 8 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L NO. 2948_ _ _ _ _ 12 lots shall achieve access via an interior private roadway. No direct access onto Watertown H.: ud will be allowed for an individual lot owner. 5. The applicant has filed the revised preliminary plan with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. All conditions of MCWD permit must be met by applicant and included with final drainage, grading and erosion control plans. 6. In a memo dated March 13, 1991, Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator, confirmed that all 12 lots have been tested and found to have suitable areas for on-site septic development. Since that memo, Mr. Gaffron has received verbal confirmation from the on-site evaluator that drainflelds can be shifted or relocated on Lot 2, Block 2 and Lot 5, Block 3 to noet the on-site septic standards of the City. 7. The proposed configuration and overall design of the lots within the plat finds that each lot satisfies the lot standards of the RR-IB Zoning District requiring no variances with the granting of the approval of this subdivision. Each lot can be developed as a residential unit without the need for future variance;?. 8. The subdivider has provided a future access corridor to the east and shall be responsible for developing the roadway to the eastern boundary providing a temporary cul-de-sac. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the revised preliminary plat of Crystal Creek per plat survey dated February 26, 1991, revised March 18, 1991 by Edward H. Sunde, a registered land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota of Sunde Land Surveying, Inc., subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 8 ^ - •. Vf CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948_________ ___^cess to the 12-lot plat must be via the Interior plat road. Lot 2, Block 2 shall be served from the temporary cul-de-sac via a 15' driveway easement through Lot 1, Block 2. Owner of Lot 1» Block 2 shall grant temporary driveway easement in favor of Lot 2, Block 2 until the adjacent private road is extended along the southern boundaries of Lot 2f Block 2. 2. Prior to any land alterations for drainage or road purposes, the following septic sites must be staked with fencing, such fencing to be installed 20' from the boundaries of each drainfield .test site as follows; Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 1» Block 2 Lot 2, Block 2 Lot 1, Block 3 (southwest corner drainfield site only) Lot 3, Block 3 Lot 5, Block 3 3. Subdivider to grant underlying road and utility easements over private road outlots (Outlots A and D). 4. Outlet A shall be installed as a 28' roadway with curb (urban section). Temporary cul-de-sac shall be designated at a 100' diameter with actual traveled turnaround at an 80' diameter. 5. Subdivider to grant conservation and flowage easements over all W3tland/flood plain areas defined at or below the 970 elevation. The subdivider should a.lso grr.nt drainage easements over drainagev.ays ano storm sewers not located within right-of-way of road outlots. Page 3 of 8 at road, ’ia a 15' Block 2 Block 2 (outhern ses, the ng to be site as nts over b (urban diameter over all Lon. The sways and CITY of ORONO resolution of the city council NO. 2948 6^'''‘'sl^iCider to execute af" ThVelbaivider^ey wHh to maintena 'ce and upkeep of pr va * inclusion in the private use the standard form used by the ^ity f private covenant- to covenants. In addition, ^ drainageways and retention areas address maintenance and protection , _-ry approval of the plat, by private property owners. to be the subdivider is to draft granting approval of the final submitted to the City prior to the City granti g plat • 7. Applicant shall create a fot^an ana maintenance of private and future deed undivided share of the ownership of include the undivided transfering ownership of residential lots must include or equal share in private road. 8. subdivider to execute a p!at “f orI«"to the Chain of Title of each o awareness of the special ensure future owners ‘"^f the rural lots and the need limitations on the septic capabilitie requests that the to protect existing septic test sites ^3 ’’"tic tenant proposed by fo^^rii^antrotTlatn-he following sentence is to be added between sentences 1 and 2: ^ most cases, these arc the onl]£ £«2 lot, and must not ^ disturbed,^ The „t\v traffic which;;;TI^^ai;rrnplaceandmustnotbesuVl£ctto- - - - - will cause even the slightest compaction^— 9 The subdivider shall maintain adequate erosion J'thi ............. ~ road, drainage improvements and until a g the property is restored. Page 4 of 8 kV - >'■> ^b^koT CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CjTY COUNCIL NO. 2948 10. ^The developer to create easements in favor of the Homeowners Association over Lots 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 3 for the purpose of maintenance and upkeep of the entrance monuments. The City approves - the monuments proposed on plans dated December 19, 1989, revised March 18, 1991 by Gerald M. Sunde entitled "Typical Monument Detail" that defines 5 1/2' high, 10 lineal feet in length, 3' wide monuments to be installed on each side of the entrance of the private road. The final installed height of these monuments cannot exceed a height of 6' measured from elevation of private road. 11. All final grading, drainage and road plans shall be done in accordance with the directives of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit and the final report of the City Engineer before any land alterations or construction can begin. The subdivider shall execute a developer's agreement that shall include all required improvements. The subdivider shall also provide a Letter of Credit to be written to the amount of 150% of the cost of all improvements. The Letter of Credit must also be submitted prior to final plat approval by the City. The subdivider is hereby advised that building permits shall not be issued upon final plat approval until gravel road base has been approved by the City Engineer and required drainage ponds and controls have been installed and approved by the City Engineer. 12. On-site evaluator to provide written confirmation that the shifting of drainfields within Lot 2, Block 2 and Lot 5, Block 3 will satisfy on-site septic standards of City Code. FINAL PLAT SUBMITTALS The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the ^.oning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays rf the month; Page 5 of 8 ? r» ••CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948_________ plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" * 200*. Drawing to include: a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Edward H. Sunde of Sunde Land Surveying, Inc. dated February 26, 1991, revised March 18, 1991, b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10* wide along all perimeter property lines and 5* each side of internal property lines - omit along the sides of the designated wetlands defined as drainage easements. c) Designate all wetland areas (areas at or below 970 elevation, drainage easements). d) Designate all drainageways and storm sewers as drainage easements on the plat. e) Dedication of right-of-way for Watertown Road. B. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: I i a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) XAie applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Executed Drainage Easements over all drainageways and storm sewer lines if applicable (refer to sample easements provided to you with original plat application), to include all drainageways not included within flood plain/wetlands area below 970 elevation.) Page 6 of 8 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948 ^ ■ '* designated wetland areas at or below 970 elevation (refer to original easement enclosed with former preliminary plat resolution). e) Signed and executed Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit to cover all required improvements. f) Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over the private road outlots (Outlots A and - refer to previous ^ samples). g) Signed and executed temporary Road and Utility Easement over portions of cul-de-sac not located within private road outlot. h) Private coyenants/creation of Homeowners' Association in a *' form for filing to include division of ownership and responsibility for maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities (refer to original documents). r. L ‘ \y i) Executed drainfield covenant prepared for filing against each lot to be amended per Item 8 in conditions of approval as noted above. j) Completed "Application for Private Road Name". Subdivider shall have the choice of naming the road within Outlot A and C (refer to original documents). C. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $300.00 I I -r / • /.f ^ ./ a) Final plat fee « $150.-^ ‘S-OO.dO b) Legal review and filing fees of $-150 “^00.00 c) Par)c dedication fee « $3,200 already paid by subdivider Page 7 of 8 03/17/97 Pay CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2948_ _ _ _ _ ;ed by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 8th day of April/ 1991. Barbara A. Peterson/ Mayor ATTEST: • I _..i— <1 1 4 .. '/04 a...Dorothy ;allin/ City Clerk STATE OF HINMESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of April/ 1991/ by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Rallin/ Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said Instrument was executed on behalf of the City.-^ Jto^ Notary Public My Commission Expires Page 8 of 8 y<cunjor $ Resolution .#2 Exhibit A 48 •••• • • «M I ■ .1 •mm • \ ^ V • • T 1 —r" •—• »-•• ■••' •• i 1 ;:‘,}] 7"rir!7ir—- ».•«.•..••••.. • •* ••••— ?-••• ••• — • at. M. • •• • ’ O! . w ••.!•• •••■ •f.tta •.•• tf.M* *•** la*.!** %.m •a.tii ».«• •f.tf* •♦•• f.m HW:^-K5 ^5=== •«.«•• •«, M • mVLr: laa •« "" lo - t T ' • t t -. • PV • VW ’ " ■■ ■•« %!• •tmmm%mm It MM •• MM M«•aM •• M< M»*M •f. !»•• •». «-•• I II » ---------------- M* •# ft. t»a aaM« _ •• %mm m7-7 U7 •«« IM« M M*« r/.r.ri: =r.-rr; r7r.v-r:.-v;v^:~.H:::5 • CMI**. ••»•••••• •• ••• ^**** Mm— •M aikMM M ♦■••••••>••-*••-•••■•••*• ^CtiMiMAtrr . _ - CU tSTac 0I€U ACAK CAffWSOH To Froms Date: Subjects Mayor Peterson 6 Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator March 29, 1991 #1457 Alan Carlson, 3140 Watertown Road - Revised Preliminary Plat - Resolution The revised preliminary plat has been accepted under the former application number (#1457) and the required public hearing scheduled at March 18/20, 1991 meeting of the Planning Commission and Council April 8, 1991 meeting. At the time of the filing of the revised subdivision application, Mr. Carlson also filed a separate conditional use permit/variance application for proposed Improvements within commons outlot involving land alterations, installation of tennis court, gazebo and trail system. Application #1630 was tabled by the Planning Commission until applicant had completed the permit review process with the Corps of Engineers for trail system. Applicant advised that Corps had no opinion concerning proposed Installation of structures, within the plat. Please review staff memo dated March 14, 1991 for more detailed Information on the filing of the revised preliminary plan. List of Exhibits fo.r #1457 - Revised Preliminary Subdivision Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit A - Resolution #2764, Preliminary Plat Approval, 3/12/90 - Carlson Letter 2/11/91 - Coolc Report 3/11/91 - Gaffron Report 3/13/91 - Staff Sketch of Future Connecting Road Final Exhibit - Revised Preliminary Plan a) Preliminary Plat b) Grading Plan c) Road Profile/Typical Section/Elevation Monuments d) Location Map Review of Revised Preliminary Application - At the March 18th meeting, the applicant submitted a second revised plan addressing the issues raised in the staff memo dated March 14th. All lots meet the dry contiguous buildable 2**acre area. All lots meet the required lot width to the rear of the front yard setback line of 50', The outlets are now redefined as follows: Zoning File #1457 March 29, 1991 Page 2 Outlot h Outlet B Outlot C Outlot D Outlot E - Private road Access path to a shared commons area for all 12 lots Area designated for future development Road outlot to future developed property at north and to connect from extension of Outlot A through A« Stubbs property Property at north side of Burlington Railroad for combination with adjacent properties if applicant wishes to release for sale. The road Is now shown connecting to the east at the edge of the A. Stubbs property. Please review Exhibit K from the packet that reflects consistency with previous planning for roadways to the east. Applicant now shows a temporary cul— de**sac. The area of a temporary cul*-de*-sac, at least portions j'ot Included within 50* road lot are not excluded from the dry buildable of the adjacent residential lots. Applicant's engineer has submitted amended road plans including street plans and profile. The revised gradlng/eroslon plans have been amended to Include erosion control. The entrance monuments proposed by applicant are the same as originally approved in the 16-lot pint. The Planning Commission asks that because of proposed grading or bermlng to the east side of the entrance that a limitation be placed on final height of monuments in relation to elevation of adjacent road stating that monuments overall final height could not exceed 6* above elevation of the private road. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of 12-lot revised preliminary plan subject to all pertinent conditions for the current plat as set forth in original Resolution #2764, Exhibit A. The Planning Commission asked the Council to consider the following additional conditions: Future development lot, Outlot C, has no legal approved access. Access to the property would have to be via adjacent properties to the east and south. Final resolution approving this subdivision shall note this. In addition, applicant must agree to execute a covenant to be filed on the Chain of Title of Outlot C agreeing to restrict development until approved access is provided via adjacent properties. •>/ 1. i ■ # X m Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates OodG. toncmott PX MmW.ltoMnc.KC. JoMpn C. AndM*. KC. Man*) L Swvtli. KC. ■chard 1 Vnc( KC. GicnnC.Ceoa.KX Thomai t NO)«t K£ Mm G. Sctcrtcht KX Suian M. Cbcrfa CKA Engineers & Architects Kdtfi A. Gofdoa Kf. MuidW^MtcPl. Donald C tmgaidL FJ. itny A. louRSoa FC. ibM A. Namoa FI. MK.BCI1FJ. Micftad t laucmjnfx fe. Aobart F FMiflivic. FI. David O ImhOQ. FX Thomas W. ^ftfioa FX MichaelClyncn. FX James F Maiand FI. Kenneth F Andenoa FX MartFaotflFX Foten C lusseF aja Thomas F Angui FX Hovva^ A SambdL FX Daniel i fdgeitoa FX Matt ASeipiFX Fhflp i Caswfi FX hmael Mardnez. FX Mart D VlaFL FX Thomai F Andersoa AJA Gary F. nytandec FX Mies ft Jensea FX L Fh^p GrM X FX %nt C FUnart AJA Agnes M. img. AJCF Jeny D Fennch. FX Cccfto Olviet FX Fotert F DrmoMK FX GafyWMoricaFX Charles A Irfckson Leo M. Favvfisty Harlan M. Oistfi CS March 11,1991 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attn: Jeanne Mabusth Re: Crystal Creek FDeNo. 139-1457 Dear Jeanne: We have reviewed the revised Crystal Creek Preliminaiy plan submitted on the Alan Carlson property. The private street (Outlot A) should be terminated in a cul-d-sac. This wouldhe temporary and u.sed until the orooerty to the east is developed. The flooding and drainage easements should be shown on Outlot D. The construction of a flood control structure on Outlot C will be required. The drainage swale along the west line of lots 1 and 2 will be necessary. An easement over the 15" culvert on Lot 1 Block 2 and Lot 5 Block 3 will be required. The plan should indicate which typical section is to be used where on the street. The proposed monument location should be shown on the plan. The street plans and profile sheet should be completed. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. GRO.dh 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612*636-4600 t « Cf m CITYof ORONO m.iiK RESOLUTION O^THE^ITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF CRYSTAL CREEK FILE NO. 1457 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, tlie City Council has considered the final plat application of a t^^'elve lot residential Class III subdivision and plat by Kingsbridge Properties, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter "the subdivider"); and WHEREAS, per Resolution No. 2948 of the City of Orono, the City Council approved the preliminary plat application for the twelve lot residential subdivision on April 8, 1991; and WHEREAS, the City Council has granted five extensions of the deadline for the preliminary subdivision application until the issue of a southern bypass for Highway 12 that would intersect the property was resolved; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-IB, Rural Residential Zoning District finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that would allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and WHEREAS, on November 26, 1996, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers approved Permit #96-254 that granted conditional approval of the grading and drainage plans for the Crystal Creek subdivision; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 1997, Stephen Weekman, Orono ’s On-Site Septic Systems Manager, reported that all tested septic sites proposed in 1990/1991 preliminary review meet City and State standards; and Page 1 of 6 m GITYofORONO ^ &RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^^96 WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. 3. 6. 8. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 2948, the resolution of the City granting preliminaiy approval of the plat. 2. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. Dedication on the plat of drainage easements over all drainageways and NURP ponds and shown as drainage easements on the plat. 4. Dedication on the plat of right-of-way for Watertown Road. Dedication of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlot A, to be known henceforth as Crystal Creek Road. Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the subdivider has dedicated to the City a road and utility easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said outlot; the subdivider has created non exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements over said outlot in favor of all abutting and/or benefitting lots including a declaration of certain maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting and/or benefitting lot owners covenants and agrees to permanently maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private road. Outlot B may be residentially developed in the future. The subdivision shall be subject to all applicable ordinances in effect at the time of subdivision. The bubdivider shall be responsible for providing legal access to the property . Outlot C is unbuildable. The parcel is divided from the remainder of the property by the Burlington Norther Railroad right-of-way and may be sold and legally combined with an adjacent property. Dedication to the City of a flowage and conservation easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands protected by the City of Orono and shown on the plat as "wetland drainage easements". Page 2 of 6 1 l!'J CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 9. 11. 12. 13. The subdivider has created a protective covenant for Lot 1, Block 2 that contains a wetland not included within the conservation maps of the City of Orono. The covenant shall include a site plan of Lot 1, Block 2 locating the area of the wetland. The subdivider has dedicated to the City a temporary road and utility easement over the cul-de-sac to be installed at the end of the private road. The easement shall be taken over portions of the 100' diameter cul-de-sac not included within the 50' road outlot. The subdivider has created drainfield covenants to be filed against the Chain of Title of each of the twelve lots within the plat in order to ensure future owners are aware of the special limitations on the septic capabilities of each of the rural lots and the need to protect existing septic test sites both during construction and after construction. The covenant will include a site plan locating the septic sites and provide guidelines for the protection of those sites. The developer has created easements in favor of the Homeowners Association over Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 for the purpose of upkeep and maintenance of the entrance monuments to be installed at the intersection of Crystal Creek Road and Watertown Road. The subdivider has executed a Developer's Agreement pro\'idtng for the installation of comprehensive improvements required as a condition of approval of the Crystal Creek subdivision. The subdivider has posted a Letter of Credit in the amount of $254,820.00 to ensure that these required improvements are completed to the City's satisfaction. Some of these comprehensive improvements include the following: A. All grading and drainage improvements as shown on Grading Plan pages C- 1 and C-2 by Sundee Engineering, Inc., most revised date January 8, 1997. B. Private road improvement as shown on C-3, Cr>’stal Creek Road Plan/Profile by Sundee Engineering, Inc., dated March 5, 1997. C. Erosion control as shown on C-1 and C-2 of the grading plans by Sundee Engineering, Inc., most revised date January 8, 1997. Page 3 of 6 ClTYofORONO '"iv 3« RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 8 a fi . D. Restoration of ground cover rid plantings per landscape plans created by subdivider. 14. The subdivider made payment to the City in 1990 of a park dedication fee in the amount of $3,200.00. 15. The subdmder has made payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants in the amount of $200.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Crystal Creek, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: The subdivider to grant driveway easement at 15’ width over Lot 6, Block i in favor of Lot 7, Block 1 that will be in effect until an alternate legal access is provided via a future private road. Access to the twelve lots within Crystal Creek shall be via the interior private plat road. Access to residential lot or lots devcK^ped within Outlot B shall be served by either Outlot A (Crystal Creek Road) ancuor approved legal access via contiguous properties. The subdivider is further advised that Outlot B caimot be residentially developed as either one or multiple lots without first seeking subdivision approval from the City of Orono. 3. Prior to any land alterations, the subdivider shall be responsible for the following: A. Installation of stormwater ponds as approved by the City of Orono and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. B. The subdivider is required to stake with fencing all septic sites. Such fencing to be installed 20' from the boundaries of each drainfield test site. C. Installation of erosion control. Page 4 of 6 ■i m •IkWr irs Win fhita u ^»:Ut F:llV:Uii)0 tlcU’ilti liTiTiW*]« WM?Wll]M?r« HfWiwMil trifTUWfl(tMlil itItliT«k«f •ICt F:1iTiHi RirririTiwn imimN iBl I ^ F; \ IWI [timfioiw«Vii<J •ViHi •1 CITYofORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^89 6 The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision approval. Dated this 12th day of May, 1997. ATTEST: m. City Clerk Gabribl Jabbour, Ma; STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of April, 1997 by Gabriel Jabbour and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Cleik of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. mm My 1 Page 6 of 6 L. TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator RE:#2467 Bohland Development, having an interest in 1025 Brown Road South (PID# 10-117-23-24-0001) Class III Preliminary Plat Subdivision--Public Hearing Exhibits: A B C D E F Application Plat map Owner’s list Zoning map Section Map City Engineer’s report (BLUEPRINTS) G H I J K L Water (Quality review Septic Report Topo Map MUSA map Webber Hills project map Preliminary Plat drawings Zoning:RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres, unsewered) Comprehensive Plan:Rural Residential Application: The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 45.1 acre parcel lying between Willow Drive South and Brown Road South into 6 parcels for single family residential development. 1 he parcel is located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is planned for rural residential development at 2 acres, according to the Comprehensive Plan. The subdivision will require a conditional use permit for grading within 5' of the property line to create a driveway for Lot 1 and may also require a variance to grade/fill within 26' of the wetland. The septic sites for Lot 5 may require a variance from the 75' setback from the NURP pond. Tliis application will also require the dedication of right-of-way for Brown Road South and Willow Drive South. The subdivision is also subject to drainage, flowage and conservation easements for the wetlands. A park dedication fee will also be required. if 2467 Bohland Development Class It! Subdivision pc-^s/ism page-l DESCRIPTION OF AREA The proposed subdivision is bordered by Willow Drive South and Brown Road South. The parcel is 45.1 acres with 23 acres of wetland in the middle of the site. The parcel is located partially within 1000* of Long Lake Creek and within 1000' of French Lake. The surrounding area is fully developed with single family homes that were constructed during the 1900's through the 1950's. TOPOGRAPHY The wetland area in the middle section of the parcel has an elevation below 932. The area north of the wetland rises from 932 to 959.2 at its highest elevation. The southern portion of the parcel rises from the 932 elevation to a high point of 967.2. Both the north and south areas dr^ into the wetland. The southern portion of the parcel has been used for agricultural purposes and is characteristic of a field. The northern portion of the parcel is heavily wooded. ZONING The parcel is zoned RR-IB, Rural Residential District. The minimum lot area requirement is 2 acres. The minimum setback requirements are noted in the table below. Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Adjacent to Street 2 acres, dry buildable 200'50'50'30'50' Wetland Setback No building, excavation or grading or filling is allowed in or within 26' of the wetlands. The proposed grading for the driveway to Lot 1 appears to encroach into this required setback. Septic Setback The minimum setback requirements for septic systems is 75' from wetlands and water supply wells. Septic systems shall be a minimum of 20' from hardcover surfaces, property lines, buildings and buried pipes. The proposed septic sites for Lot 5 are too close to the NURP pond. The septic sites should be 75' from the NURP pond. U2467 Bohland Development Class 11/ Subdivision PC^3/15/99 page-2 PARCEL INFORMATION Property Identification: The subdivision includes the following parcels: 38 10-117-23 21 0001 38 10-117-23 21 0007 39-10-117-23 24 0001 The above parcels are under the ownership of E.S. Borman and J.E. Corwin. Julius Hendel is listed as the taxpayer. The tax data indicates that it has been previously taxed as vacant residential land. Exception: A 50* by 200* strip of wetland is shown as an exception along the cast property line of the proposed subdivision. This parcel of land was tax-forfeited in 1982 to the State of Minnesota. It was conveyed to the City of Orono for drainage purposes. Greg Gappa, Public Services Director, has indicated that it is not needed by the City. If die City made this parcel available to the applicant, the entire wetland area west of Brown Road South could be included in a conservation and flowage easement agreement. LOT INFORMATION Proposed Lots: Lot Total Dry 1 20.8 acres 5.7 acres 2 9.3 acres 3.6 acres 3 4.4 acres 2 acres 4 2.3 acres 2 acres 5 2.4 acres 2 acres 6 2 acres 2 acres U2467 Bohtand Development Class III Subdivision PC^mS/99 page-i . I Lot Area: Wetlands: NURP: Net Dry Buildable Area: 45.1 acres 23.4 acres .4 acres 21.3 acres The proposed subdivision creates six lots that meet the minimum lot area requirements of 2 acres of dry buildable land. Loti Lot 1 is the largest parcel witli 20.8 acres total with 5.7 acres dry buildable. Due to the configuration of Lot 1 and access from King Street, Lot 1 may not be fluther subdivided. A portion of Lot 1 is located within 1000' of Long Lake Creek. This part of the lot is subject to hardcover requirements. No more than 35% of the lot area in this setback fix>m Long Lake Creek may be hardcover. Access to Lot 1 is proposed by constructing a private driveway in King Street. The City Engineer questions vdiether two separate driveways should be allowed next to each other instead of a shared driveway. The amount of grading to install a driveway also requires review by MC WD because there may be an impact on the wetland. Construction easements and retaining walls may also be necessary. Because this is not ordinary and customary grading next to a property line, a conditional use permit in addition to a land alteration permit will be necessary. Lot 2 Lot 2 is a 9.3 acre parcel with 3.6 acres dry buildable. The proposed lot could not be further subdivided. The lot will have frontage on Willow Drive, however, access shall not be allowed via Willow Drive. Therefore, the setback frx>m Willow Drive should be considered a side yard adjacent to street The proposed subdivision indicates that this lot will be served by an outlot (148* x 30*) fix)m the cul-de-sac. The City Engineer recommends that the City discuss whether this is acceptable. The odd shaped lot creates a problem for determining how to define the yards and corresponding setbacks. Should this lot be considered a backlot because it is behind the existing residence on Willow Drive and served via an outlot from the cul-de-sac? Septic sites on this lot will need to be at least 75* from the wetlmd. Lot 3 Lot 3 is 4.4 acres with 2 acres dry buildable. This lot cannot be further subdivided. It is proposed to be served by the cul-de-sac. The septic sites need to be 20' from the property lines and 75' from the wetland. The outlot that provides access to Lot 2 will require that a 50' setback be provided next to the outlot. U2467 Bohland Development Class lU Subdivision PC--3/15/99 page'-4 Lot 4 Lot 4 is an odd-shaped lot that is technically considered a through lot because it has potential access from Brown Road. This lot also surrounds the exception that should be sold to the developer and included in the lot. Lot 4 is proposed to be served by the cul-de-sac. The final resolution should state that no access will be allowed from Brown Road. Lots Lot 5 is proposed to be 2.4 acres with 2 acres dry buildable. This lot is proposed to have the NURP pond. It is dso proposed to be served by the cul-^e-sac even though it has potential access from both Willow Drive and the private road, "Carriage Lane". Access shall be prohibited from Willow Drive and the driveway for fiiis lot shall be from Carriage Lane, not the cul-de-sac. Lot 6 Lot 6 is proposed to be 2 acres of dry buildable land. This lot has frontage on Willow Drive and Carriage Lane. The driveway is proposed from the cul-de-sac. The driveway shall be installed from Carriage Lane and access from Willow Drive shall be prohibited. This lot will be subject to two side yard adjacent to street setbacks, from Willow Drive and the outlot/cul-de-sac. The septic sites need to be at least 20' from the property lines. ACCESS The subdivider proposes access for Lot 1 to be provided via a driveway in King Street. King Street is platted as a dead end street. Currently there is a driveway in King Street that serves 775 Brown Road South (Simpson residence). The subdivider is proposing to construct a driveway next to the existing driveway. The City Engineer has raised concerns about this proposal. (See Exhibit F). The other five lots are proposed to be served by a private road, "Carriage Hill Lane', from Willow Drive South. Lots 2,5, and 6 have fiontage on Willow Drive, however, access shall not be allowed from these lots directly to Willow Drive. Lots 1 and 4 also have possible access to Brown Road. Access to Lot 1 shall from King Street and Lot 4 shall not be allowed to have a driveway curb cut on Brown Road. The subdivider has shown Lots 3,4,5, and 6 as having driveways from the cul-de-sac. Lots 5 and 6 should be served from Carriage Hill Lane. Lot 2 is proposed to have access from an outlet platted at 148' in length and 30' in width. The City Engineer has concerns about an outlet being platted from the cul-de-sac. U2467 Bohland Development Class III Subdivision PC’-3/l5/99 pages Carriage Hill Lane shall be platted at a SO' right-of-way with a paved width of 24'. The length of the private road is approximately 350' from Willow Drive South to the center of the cul-de-sac in conformance with the subdivision requirements. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The subdivider has proposed a NURP pond in the comer of Lot 5. The proposed location of the NURP pond is too close to the property line. It should be at least 55' from the property line so that a septic site on the adjacent property could be located 20' from the property line without requiring a variance. Allowing the NURP pond to be located on or adjacent to the property line impacts the adjacent property's ability to locate a septic site in the future. The NURP pond is also too close to the septic sites for Lot 5 and does not have an adequate bench of 10:1. Septic sites are required to be at least 75' from a wetland or pond. The City Engineer has recommended that the storm sewer be constructed to route storm flows from the street to the pond. All storm pipes are recommended to be reinforced concrete pipes instead of corrugated metid pipes. The pond needs to have an outlet structure that provides 1' of skinuning to remove floatables and debris. Permanent erosion control should be installed downstream from the pond to prevent sedimentation into French Lake. SEPTIC SYSTEMS The parcel is not within the MUSA line. The Crystal Bay sewer project is to the south of the proposed subdivision. The Webber Hills sanitary sewer project is proposed for the area to the north of diis subdivision. On-site septic systems are proposed for this development. The septic sites are required to be 75* from the wetlands and NURP pond and at least 20' from property lines and hardcover. Staff has not been able to verify the septic information because the ground is still frozen. This preliminary plat snail not move forward imtil Steve Weckman, On-Site Septic Systems Manager, has been able to approve each proposed primary and secondary site. Any site that does not meet the City's requirements may require that the preliminary plat and proposed lots lines and ponding area be revised. DEDICATIONS The subdivider shall be required to dedicate 33' of right-of-way for Brown Road (County Road 146) and 66' of right-of-way for Willow Drive. This will leave Outlot A separated from the proposed U2467 Bohland Development Class 111 Subdivision PC-3/15/99 page—6 subdivision. Outlot A should be made available to the abuttting property at 845 Willow Drive South for legal access. EASEMENTS The subdivider shall provide standard drainage and utility easements along interior and exterior property lines (5* interior and lO* exterior). The subdivider shall also provide drainage, conservation and flowage easements across the wetland. Road and utility easements and maintenance agreements will be required for the private road. Carriage Hill Lane. VEGETATION MAP The subdivision ordinance provides in Section 11.60 for the preservation of natural features and amenities. The subdivider shall provide a vegetation map that shows the number and location of existing trees on site to be preserved. The ordinance provides that the City may require the subdivider to provide shade trees along the perimeter of the subdivision; one shade tree may be planted every 40 feet. The proposed preliminary plat has been sent to Wally Case, DSU landscape architect for review. His comments will be provided at the Planning Commission meeting. The Park Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary plat at their March meeting and requested land for a buffer strip along Willow Drive to plant trees for screening of the houses from the road. However, staff does not recommend that the City accept land for tree planting. Staff prefers to wait for the landscape architect's recommendation for screening and buffering in accordance with the subdivision ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION To review and discuss: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. King Street and proposed driveway, grading, filling and conditional use permit Lot configuration and setbacks Proposed access, driveways and outlot Septic sites and setbacks from NURP pond Design and setback for NURP pond Vegetation and landscaping Outlot A and exception area U2467 Bohland Development Class III Subdivision PC-3/15/99 page-7 A Application # Date Received J-t Amount Paid (^5^6 CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address S (Scw-Aj^ ^ . Property Identification Number (PID)__ Please check one - Property yc abstract or Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Name Q Address City____ torrens? 0Oc7 <0 It 7 e*oi <*7 i Zip OWNER (if different than applicant) Name • Phone (home) "73^0 Phone (work) </7 ‘3 ‘ / Address City Phone (home) Zip____Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District PROPOSAL «» Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels % • \ Residential; no. of units____ Other (specify) _________ Division for Tax Purposes _ _________ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites O Existing Units (o New Units (- Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per 7 Acres * !2 <ic r-e . Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land / yC Residential _ Other (specify) 'i • : " I 'v; NUP^IUM ^UTEIUAL REQUIRED FOR COiMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Paj-ment of fees (refer to ’application fees’ listed below. 2. Completed application form. 3. Preluninaiy plat information on Certificate of Surv^. c2tte jSsSi)*” ^ ^ Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Zoning CfficU^sT atitfe ’ W**®®**®*^ Pl«®“ *«*ch a ^arate Ust of any other persons you wish notified of this applicaUon. ^ — ■ " ■ I * ----------- ---------------Ofltc ^_______ ________ MINBTT’M MATERIAL REQUniED FOR COMPLETE FINAL APPLICATION 1. Paym«t of f^ (refer to Preliminary Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of formal plat 3. Title opinioa 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit Zoning OfficiaTs Signature ___________________________________ L APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check DC] those which apply) A. Application Base Fees: _____ Sketch Plan Review (Class I, n&ni)S250.00 — — Subdivision ofa Lot Line Rearrangement S3S0.(X) I Sub^^uion Application (Class I &IDS3S0.00 --------Preliminary Subdivision Application $375.00+S25.00/lot (Class III & all non-residential) _____Final Plat Application (Class HI) $200.00 _____ Legal Review and Filing: Subdivision only $75.00 Totals 3Sar • • _ Subdivision w/easements and covenants mia $200.00 Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) Legal and ^gineering Review Fees (as incurred) Renewal of Class I and n Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change fi^m original application) Renewal of Class III, Preliminary Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change fiom original application) Renewal of Final Class HI Subdivision Application $150.00 (No change fiom original application) lia ft. X .50 = S_ Iiaft.x.S0B$ B. Special Improvement Fees: _____ Propel Private Roads $600.00 + $.50/lineal ft.; _____ Proposed Public Roads $900.00 +$.50/lineal ft;_____ _____ Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $900.00 --------Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.00 + $25/stub _____Prr^rosed Watermain Extension $250.00 + $25/stub -------- Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) $200.00 —I---- On-Site System, Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $50.(X)/per lot x new lots C» Flexible Application Fees/IVIisc. Fees -I. Variance $220.(X) ($50.00 per each additional variance) _____Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision $100.00 _____PRD Application with Subdivision $30.00/DweIling Unit 3^0 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, Ci^' Anomey, ordlnMKe^°*™™***°" to o^ess^tluJvapplication and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by Applicant ’s Signature ____________ Dat e D / f -yA 9_____________ Owner’s Signature _________ ___________________________ Applicant must have all submittals into the City Office 25 days before the Plaiuiing Commission meeting. Platuiing Commission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If u applicmt is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in vour place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. N (I) •n __lil_!___t«___ ■*-2. 1*1 M !•*t (tlj B7u ? * >»<i •* f*j* irvcv (« Io- u 7^3- OJ iL 3 C^Sl{ f JSX :ap)k: •3IN^XRiCWS 2!l^ RUN DATE 02/0A/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI9SM91 PAGE IS BATCH 509 PROP AOINI OHNER NAia TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR SB 10-117-2S 21 0001 OOfSa ADDRESS UNASSXGNED E S BOmAN I J E CORHXN E S BORMAN S J E CORHXN C/0 BURT H CORHXN 900 1ST AVE N 0229 MPLS NN 55901 SB 10-117-2S 21 0002 OOOSa ADDRESS UNASSXGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 90 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55S2S SB 10-117-2S 21 0009 01000 HXLLOH DR S KEENAN G RICHARDSON ET AL KEENAN 6 RICHARDSON B JEAN LEDELL RICHARDSON 1000 HILLOH DR S HAYZATA MN 55S91 . J PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR SB 10-117-2S 21 0009 02195 FRENCH LAKE RD H SINXLER III t H G HARRIS HHARTON SXNKLER III t MARGHERXTA G HARRIS P 0 BOX 97 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55S2S r • Vj SB 10-117-2S 21 0007 OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSXGNED E S BORMAN B J E CORHXN JULIUS HENDEL C/0 BURT H CORHXN 900 1ST AVE N MPLS MN 55901 J SB 10-117-2S 22 0001 00B25 HXLLOH DR S PHYLLIS FADDEN PHYLLIS FADDEN B25 HILLOH DR S HAYZATA MN 55S91 OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR SB 10-117-2S 22 0002 00B95 HXLLOH DR S 0 A B A E ANDERSON GILBERT A ANDERSON B95 S HXLLOH DR HAYZATA MN 55S91 SB 10-117-2S 22 0009 02295 FRENCH LAKE RD T J BUNEVIK ET AL THOMAS J BUNEVIK B CHRISTINE GRANLXNO BURNEVIK SOSO NORTHERN AVE HAYZATA MN 55S91 SB 10-117-2S 22 0012 02250 FRENCH LAKE RD LUCY MCDONALD HHITNEY ET AL CRAIO S B LUCY N STANDISN, 2250 FRENCH LAKE RD HAYZATA MN 55591 SB 10-117-25 22 0019 PROP ADDR ^ OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSXGNED OHNER NAME CHARLES S B SUSAN H LANNM TAXPAYER CHARLES S LANNON NAME/ADDR B70 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD HAYZATA MN 55591 SB 10-117-25 22 0017 OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSXGNED R B J DAYTON ROBERT J B JOAN L DAYTON 1 FRENCH LAKE RD HAYZATA MN 55591 SB 10-117-25 23 0005 OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSXGNED R C B N LUX ROBERT C B NANCY LUX 1209 FRENCH CREEK DR HAYZATA MN 55S91 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR SB 10-117-25 29 0001 01025 BROHN RD S E S BORMAN i J E CORHXN JULIUS HENDEL C/0 BURT N CORHXN 900 1ST AVE NO MPLS MN 55901 SB 10-117-2S 29 0002 01095 BROHN RD S S D VANDEVEIRE ET AL STEVEN D VAN DE VEIRE 1095 S BROHN RD HAYZATA MN 55391 • SB 10-117-23 29 OOOS 010B5 BROHN RD S ROBERT BERRETT ROBERT E BERRETT 10B5 BR^ RD S HAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADDR OHNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR SB 10-117-23 29 0009 01105 BROHN RD S JERRY L CHRISTENSON JERRY CHRISTENSON 1105 BROHN RD S HAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 29 0005 01115 BROHN RD S SUZANNE KATHLEEN LEJA SUZANNE KATHLEEN LEJA 1115 BROHN RD S HAYZATA MM 55391 SB 10-117-23 29 0009 011S5 BROHN RD S D A GLEH BPS GLEH DUANE A B PATRICIA S GLEH 1135 BROHN RD S HAYZATA MN 55391 O WUN DATE 02/0A/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATZON SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PZ4S54U PAGE 14 BATCH 504 PROP ADOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SO 10-117-2S 24 0007 OllSB ' BROWN RD S J A STEZNHETZ/C J STEZNHETZ JOHN A S CAROL J STEINHETZ P 0 BOX 42 CRYSTAL HN 55S2S SB 10-117-2S 24 0008 01140 WILLOW DR S D B LZESCH A C H LZESCH DAVID B 8 CARLA N LIESCH 1140 WILLOW DR S WAYZATA NN 55S91 SB 10-117-2S 24 0011 OHIO WILLOW OR S C A SUESS 0 J J KEHNA JANES KEHNA/CANDEE ANN SUESS 1110 WILLOW DR S WAYZATA HM S5S41 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR SB 10>117-2S 24 0012 OlOOS WILLOW DR S NARTHA L SPENCER HARTHA ALICE LEIGH SPENCER 1005 WILLOW DR S WAYZATA HN 55S41 SB 10-117-2S 24 0016 01099 WILLOW DR S GLORIA K ROGER GLORIA K ROGER 1099 WILLOW DR S WAYZATA HN 55S91 SB 10-117>25 24 0017 01115 WILLOW DR S TODD N 6ABRZELS0N ET AL TODD H B SUE E 6ABRZELS0N 1115 WILLOW DR S WAYZATA HN 55S91 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR SB 10-117-2S 24 0016 01145 WILLOW DR S BETTE PERL BETTE PERL 1145 WILLOW DR S WAYZATA HN 55S91 SB 10-117*23 24 0019 01220 LAKEVZEW AVE DOUGLAS PAUL SCHNOOR B WIFE DOUGLAS B NORNA SCHNOOR 1220 LAKEVZEW AV WAYZATA HN 55S91 SB 10-117-2S 24 00S2 01120 WILLOW DR S JUDITH A ORAUNKE JUDITH A GRAUNKE 1120 WILLOW DR S WAYZATA NN 55S91 CD PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER ‘ NAHE/ADDR SB 10-117-23 24 0055 OllSO WILLOW DR S S B D HCWZLLIAHS SHIRLEY B DORCAS HCWZLLIAHS IISO WILLOW DR S CRYSTAL BAY HN 55S2S SB 10-117-23 24 0034 01055 WILLOW OR S D B J KAYE DALE R B JOAN KAYE 1055 WILLOW OR WAYZATA HN 55S91 TOTAL BATCH 504 00047 CQ • i I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATZON AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE* ON TIC RECORDS OF THE HEIWEPIH COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF DATE rm'i \L M £5 V‘y or> RUN DATE «2/tA/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST BATCH 504 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 58 OS-117-25 55 0001 0005S ADDRESS UNASSXCNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 40 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55525 50 05-117-25 54 0004 02155 SHEVLXN DR J I J PAULSON JEROME T 0 JUDY K PAULSON 2155 SHEVLXN DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55591 58 05-117-25 54 0019 02140 SHEVLXN OR F 0 LARSON I J H LARSON FRANK 0 8 JENNIFER N LARSON 2140 SHEVLXN DR WAYZATA HN 55591 58 05-117-25 54 0029 02015 WEBBER HILLS RD RICHARD W PULA ETAL RICHARD W PULA 2015 WEBBER HILLS ROAD WAYZATA HN 55591 58 10-117-25 11 0002 00058 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MCLEOD CNTY REO RAIL AUTH DAKOTA RAIL INC 25 ADAMS ST N HUTCHINSON HN 55550 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 58 10-117-25 12 0005 00950 BROWN RD S GARY 0 FRETHEXH ETAL GARY D FRETHEIM 950 BROWN ROAD WAYZATA HN 55591 REPORT NO. PI455401 PAGE 12 58 05-117-25 55 0004 00740 WILLOW DR S R W FULLERTON ET AL ROBERT FULLERTON 8 CAROLINE KNOLL FULLERTON 740 WILLOW DR S WAYZATA MN 55591 58 05-117-25 54 OOCl 00775 BROWN RD S H 0 SIMPSON ASM SIMPSON H D SIMPSON ASM SIMPSON 775 BROWN RD S WAYZATA HN 55591 -5 58 05-117-25 54 0007 02175 SHEVLXN DR K P RAKOS ANN GUSTAFSON K P RAKOS ANN GUSTAFSON 2175 SHEVLXN DR WAYZATA HN 55591 58 05-117-25 54 0018 02170 SHEVLXN DR R P WIENS A J A WIENS ROBERT P 8 JULIE A WIENS 2170 SHEVLXN DR WAYZATA HN 55591 58 05-117-25 54 0027 02055 WEBBER HILLS RD D R A N H WILLXAHS DAVID R/HARGARET H WILLXAHS 2055 WEBBER HILLS RD WAYZATA HN 55591 58 05-117-25 54 0028 02025 WEBBER HILLS RD E J VOLDEN ACM DUCHARME E J VOLDEN ACM DUCHARME 2025 WEBBER HILLS RD WAYZATA HN 55591 58 05-117-25 45 0004 00740 'BROWN RD S T R BRDWNE A S R BROWNE THOMAS R BROWNE 740 SO BROWN ROAD WAYZATA HN 55591 58 05-117-25 45 0005 00800 BROWN RD S R A VXCKERMAN ET AL WA EST RUTH ANNE VXCKERMAN 800 BROWN RD S WAYZATA HN 55591 58 10-117-25 12 0001 00040 BROWN RD S DAVID M SKEIE A WIFE DAVID H SKEIE 840 BROWN ROAD SOUTH WAYZATA HN 55591 58 10-117-25 12 0002 00920 BROWN RD S N J STRAND A C J B STRAND NICHOLAS A COLETTE STRAND 920 S BROWN RD S WAYZATA HN 55591 58 10-117-25 12 0004 00940 BROWN RD S A A C JOHNSTON ALEXANOER/CATHERINE JOHNSTON 940 BROWN RD S WAYZATA HN 55591 58 10-117-25 15 0001 01000 BROWN RD S J A 8 P A ABBOTT ET AL JAMES A 8 PATRICIA ABBOTT 4471 GENOA DR AMELIA ISLAND FL 52054 n> ZONlKJgr MA.F R*1A On* f R^B One F LR*1A One F. — »%Xi2 m MS mn icn oroi a MIUID-VI soinx^ fitf KING STm ^ (0^ '»> 2 itJi ••nm U.M < jonsTon PIEKI lot c »if '• m i» 6'^n 1* ^X) i?i t !» in 1 ’ ■•5J •!*< If*i- '§ „** !» 4-V ^ 1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& |\J| Associates Engineers & Architects March 9.1999 Elizabeth Van2tomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re: Carriage Hill Subdivision File No. 139-2467 Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderhk and Associates. Inc is an Affirmative Action/Bquat Opportunity Employer Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. PE. • Joseph C. Anderitk. PE. • Marvin L Sorvala. PE. • Richard E Turner. PE • Glenn R CooH. PE • Robert G. Schunicht. PE. • Jerry A Bourdon. PE. • Robert W. Rosene. PE. and Susan M. Eberlin. C PA.. Senior Consultants Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PE. • Keith A Gordon. PE. • Robert R. Pfefferle. PE. • Richard W Foster. PE. • David O. Loskota. P£. • Robert C. Russek. A l A. • Mark A. H»isoa PE. • Michael T. Rautmann. PE • Ted K Field. PE. • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolfs. P£. • Sidney P Williamson. PE.. LS • Robert F Koismith • Agnes M. Ring • Michael P Rau. PE. • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE. Offices: St. Paul. Rochester. Wilimar and St. Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl Website: wwwboncsfroo com CKf- riirvfcrOBdi ^.Ofvcrcie fApe Dear Liz: We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed six lot Carriage Hill subdivision. The site is located west of Brown Road South (C.R. 146), east of Willow Drive and south of the Webber Hills neighborhood in the northwest quarter of Section 10. We have the following conunents in regards to engineering matters. 1. Access: The proposed access location for Carriage Lane appears acceptable. We recommend that Carriage Lane be constructed to a 24-foot paved width in accordance with City standards for a private street serving 3 to 6 units. We also recommend that Carriage Lane be an urban street section with concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer. The City should review and determine whether the 150-foot driveway across Outlot B to Lot 2 is acceptable. Final plans should include a typical street section for both Carriage Lane and the driveway to Lot 1. Access to Lot 1 along King Street is adjacent to an existing driveway serving the property to the north. Does it make sense to have two separate driveways side by side or would a combined access be more appropriate? The proposed plan for the access to Lot 1 appears to require some extensive grading. Construction easements or retaining walls may be required to construct this access. It also appears that the construction of this access will impact the wetland and wetland buffer. Plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MC\^) for their review. Geotechnical reconunendations and street design should be provided for our review. 2. Grading: A grading and erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any grading, particularly along the wetland and ponding area. Additional erosion control will be needed during construction of the houses and septic systems. 3. Drainage: As stated in # 1 above, we recommend that storm sewer should be constructed to route storm flows from the street to the pond. Based on the drainage calculations submitted, it appears that the existing 12-inch CMP under Willow Drive will remain in place. The CMP will act in conjunction with the proposed 15-inch CMP. We reconunend that all storm pipes be RCP rather than CMP. We recommend that the pond have an outlet structure that provides 1-foot of sidmming to remove floatables and debris. Some Type of permanent erosion control measures should be installed downstream from the pond to prevent sedimentation in French Lake. We have attached additional comments from our water resources department regarding water quantity and quality. 4. Utilities: City sewer exists just south of the site on Willow Drive. The City should review and determine whether they intend to ever provide sewer service to this area. 5. Easements: Final plattir 4 should include 33 feet of dedicated right-of-way for C.R. 146 and 66 feet of dedicated right-of-way for Willow Drive. Does Outlot A have any impact on access to the lot south of Willow Drive? The drainage and utility easements shown appear to be acceptable. Additional easements may be required if sanitary sewer is provided. 6. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we will prepare an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 ■ Fax; 651-636-1311 Memo 1/1 Bonestroo ggRowne Anderlfl(& |\J| Associates EnglMtrt 4 ArcMitctf Project Name: Carriage Hill Development To: Tom Kellogg From: Heather A. Olson Client: CityofOrono File No: 139gen-#2467 Date: March 3,1999 Re: Stormwater quantity and quality review Remarks: General This review concerns the Carriage Hill development as detailed in the plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services Inc. dated 2/19/99. This site is located east of Willow Drive in the northwest quarter of section 10. The site consists of six 2+ acre lots located on approximately 45 acres. The site will drain west under Willow Drive into the wetland surrounding French Lake. Water Quality The proximity of this development to both French Lake and the adjacent wetlands, Increases the irnportance of erosion control and treatment for the runoff from this site. We offer the following recommendations. 1. Heavy-duty silt fencing should be installed on each lot along the construction limits. All silt fencing shall remain intact until there is vegetation established on the entire site. 2. The rear yard drainage from lots 1,2,3 and 4 drain into the adjacent wetland without being treated. A 26 ’ wetland buffer has been indicated on the plan, please submit a typical section and description for City staff to review. 3. There Is some concern for the drainfield/septic system located on Lot 5 block 1. It appears to encroach upon the proposed water quality ponding. It is recommended that the ordinance for the 75 ’ offset be enforced for this ponding area. The discharge from this drainfleld will impact the nutrient loading within the proposed pond which outlets into French Lake. The soil borings shcuid also be submitted for city staff to review. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderllk and Associates 2335 West Highway 36 # St. Paul, MN 55113 # Phone:651-636-4600# Fax:651-636-1311 Memo Bon«streo RoMne AndertOc& Associates IAglri#«rt 4 A4^t*cti 4. Excavation of temporary sedimentation ponds and the use of BMPs should be in place during each lot construction to reduce the erosion to the adjacent wetland. Water Quantity The topography of this site prevents the entire site to drain to a single ponding area. We offer the following recommendations: 1. It is recommended that the Impervious surfaces, (house, driveway, and yard) and any land disturbed during construction be routed to drain into the street and Into the proposed ponding area. This will reduce the amount of untreated runoff draining directly to the adjacent wetland. 2. The 100-year HWL for the proposed pond does not seem to provide sufficient freeboard for Willow Road. The elevation of the low point on Willow Road should bo established and submitted to city staff. 3. The covor for the outlet structure under Willow Road should be evaluated. 4. It is difficult to determine from the grading plan whether a maintenance bench above the pond NWL is being provided. At a minimum there should be one provided around Inlets, outlets, and at any point where dredging operations might occur. 5. The ponding area should also have a 10:1 aquatic bench at the ponds NWL. The ponding area illustrated on the plans does not appear to have this feature. 6. The installation of an Emergency Over Flow (E.O.F.) is recommended for this pond. The E.O.F. should provide overland drainage for the pond during storms that exceed the 100-year event, and or when the outlet structure becomes obstructed. The EOF should protect adjacent homes and roadways. Bon0»troo, Anderllk and Assoclatea 2335 West Highway 36 » St. Paul. MN 55113 « Phone: 651-636-4600 » Fax: 651-636-1311 TO:Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator FROM: Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager DATE:March 4,1999 SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2467,Carriage Hill - Subdivision The proposed six lot subdivision requires the use of on-site sewage treatment systems. Site evaluation/design has been completed for primary and alternate drainfleld sites on each lot. Due to frozen gound conditions, staff can't verify the accuracy of the soil borings or recommend approval of the subdivision at this time. The information submitted by Westwood Professional Services identifies two drainfield sites on each property meeting all City and State standards. Staff approval of the septic plan will be granted once the City can verify the soil mformation and complete system design information is submitted by Westwood. The stormwater drainage pond on the southwest comer of the property must be redesigned to meet a 55 foot setback from the property line to the highwater mark. The setback is required to eliminate future setback conflicts when septic system upgrades are required on adjoining properties. Based on the above information, staff recommends approval of the application on the condition that the soil information is verified by Staff and all final septic system design information is provided. The city requires the drainfield sites to be fenced off prior to any grading or land alteration. A • ♦ A . m •- NUI/4 SEC. 10 TII7N.R23W HENNEPIN COUNTY •••• •• f MUU/OttS. UK. «•«« wpvM* mi i-rm 7^ ..r^7^.^r^jGB.'rjTL^ima£.E‘i *r « rt . u.. ■ n ■ m n Gty ofOrbno Minnesota fpSrtV / fsasp MUSA BOUNDARY Umttt iPmrtXVn Part XU J» , ‘ I, - V. /• Ilf ' !% ••*,* ___ PS'a " iii / / / / iPCJi* •*’U2i*** m m rTi ■§”' JMVttL ________j PartVn ^ Part XXVI CURRENT MUSA PartXVm pftrtxxvm / / / m JZ-y / / hwunffmmtikafTmimtm, O tom SckMMaMid M KKitary HcnkkOfck Cbci7 CktMfftmdtit OitM Mika. MdBA)iw» U m^V. Fciadyt Caya^lUailSMiiteia CijftnIBqr FaiacrFlapatjr KlakMarUCaiiidafWcil »lkiiiqrl2C«ii4wlHt. WortkSWyca^kHaa ISO Biawi laid NtMl FilnNjrKIbiUMM Firtl FmiU F«tia F«fIV PirtV Part VI PartVn pirtvxn PrttOC P«tX Pm XI PartXn PartXZU PM XIV Pm XV PM XVI pMXvn PMXVn fMtaPMFMP PmXDC PMXX LMgUkaONMTOi* Pm XXI EMliMLafca PMXXn OmmOmk m4t PMXXm F«Mi%i PMXXIV WakMrHBIf PM XXV EdtiwdNOf PMXXVI PMXXVD FaaMB PMXXVm BayiWt^llMiiMd PmXXDC OMMfcMaMackigr Altai PMXXX PnkiaaPitpn^ FrtfMMMUSAAMMM PM XXXI MamflBt/Afti *Aaacaa4 If Oqr MUat Uha (RaaflilllS 4-144Q) (RtMLilDS 4.1449 (RatfLilDS 4.1449 (KtaaLfllll 4*1449 CAaML fills 4-1449 OUMiflll? 114S41) (RaMLfim 114M1) (XaMl.iP:^i 14149 0UMLf2.ll 14149 (IU mLMSP S4I49 0UafLf24l7 S4S49 OUatLSSUI S444I) OUffimiS 54441) (WMfLimi 54441} QU mI il2i) 54443) OUHLillSI S.1M9 OUHLflfa 101541) 0UMLH4t 104549 OUMLfllfl 104549 OUMLfITfl 101149 (RnaLflTfl 104549 dUaoLflTfl 104549 OUMlimi 104549 OUMLfITfl 104549 OUMLfITfl 104549 OUMLfITfl 104549 OtttfLflTfl 104549 OUMLfITfl 104549 (fMtLflTfl 104549 (RtMLfllfl 104549 (haflig) DAM I.G RUN SHARDLOVV AND UBAN ORONO. MINNESOTA SANITARY SCWCR IMPROVEMENTS FIGURE 2 BoMtIreo ROMfl* AndtfUk A |\j| AttoeiitM *03/1^/99 13:49 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU. INC.@001 1 DAI ILCJRl-N! SHARDIX)W ANi:>UBAN Fof Fax Notf "U7. \)ALi^^«4-fe>oo From Phoiw* tNC( CONSULTING PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH . SUITE 210 MINNEAPOLIS. MN SS401 012 339 3300 PHONE 612337-5601 FAX DATE:14 March 1999 TO:Elizabeth Van Zomeren Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Fax 612-249-4616 FROM:Wallace L. Case, ASLA Landscape Architect/Planner RE:Review of Preliminary Plat Submission Drawings Class III Subdivision Preliminary Plat Bohland Development 1025 Brown Road S. Application # 2467 In response to your request, we have visited the site, reviewed the Preliminary Plat Submission Drawings for the proposed Carriage Hill Development and have the following comments. I nr 1 ISSUES The proposed development of Lot 1 raises several issues that need to be addressed Access: The developer proposes providing access to Lot 1 from Brown Road S by widening an existing driveway that serves an existing home to the north. 1.Existing access at this location is provided by a very obscure, narrow cut through a 8 to 12 feet high embankment. The existing narrow cut and a high concrete retaining wall immediately along the north side of the existing drive limits visibility into and out of the drive. The proposed plans for accessing Lot 1 call for a 0;\JOBS\1601\CAWfl.399\399CAFlHL.MEM 03/14/99 13:49 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU, INC.@002. 2. 3. Tree removal: 1. 2. widened and combined drive which will increase the visual prominence of the drive, and improve visibility to and from the drive. However, the sight distance to the north needs to be reviewed. The building site for Lot 1 is located on a wooded island surrounded almost entirely by wetland. The proposed driveway for this location is approximately 480 feet long. It is west facing, has a maximum grade of 10 percent, and requires approximately 100 feet retaining wall (approximately 5 high) along each side where it crosses between the wetland edges. Depending on the height of this wall, it may require a railing along the top for safety and to meet code. The proposed grading for the drive would result in a diversion of surface runoff onto the adjacent northern property. Appropriate drainage rights must be secured from the owner of that property. This driveway in combination with the building site and septic field will require the removal of approximately .95 acres of woods. The developer should provide more detailed information about the size and type of trees that will be removed or affected by the development of this lot and drive. Several large maple/basswood trees located along Brown Road S just south of the proposed access point would be removed or affected by the proposed access design. If possible large/significant trees should be preserved and incorporated into the grading design of the Lot 1 and the access point. The Subdivision Regulations indicate that trees shown as retained must be protected and preserved. The root zones of trees and woods to remain are to be fenced and maintained as off limits to construction activities. Any damage to trees to be preserved is to be treated by trained arborist. Wetlands Encroachment: The nature and source of the wetland boundary shown on the plans was not identified. A field wetland delineation and survey should be provided where the drive crosses or where septic fields are proposed at the minimum 75 feet setback from the wetlands. The grading plan shows a -2- 1 *03/r4T/99 13:50 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU, INC.Q1003 possible grading encroachment into the 26 feet wetland buffer at the Lot 1 crossing area. I AMDSCAPtNG: in accordance with Section 11.60, Subd. 2 of the Orono Subdivision Regulations, as a requirement of subdivision approval, the City Council may require that the subdivider plant shade trees on the property along the project roads or abutting roads. The requirement calls for planting one shade tree 12 inch caliper) per every forty feet of frontage and identifies that the trees planted shall be long-lived shade trees. 1.The entire southern part of the site is currently an open field with volunteer treas at the fence line along the existing roads. After development, the view from the adjacent streets will be of the rear yards and private spaces of the new homes. The visual appearance of the project as viewed from the public streets and adjacent properties would be improved by the addition of shade trees along the southern 660 feet of Willow Drive, the rear yard of Lot 4 along Brown Road S, and both sides of Carriage Lane. We recommend the City require the developer to plant deciduous shade trees at 50 feet spacing along the right-of-way of Carriage Lane and southern 660 feet of Willow Drive. We also recommend that the City require the developer to plant an evergreen or ornamental tree buffer in the rear yard of Lot 4, and groups of ornamental/overstory trees around the proposed drainage basin in the southwest corner of the site. 2.Lot 2 functions as a flag lot and It will require approximately 150 feet of driveway between the side yards of Lots 3 and 6. The City should require the developer to provide an adequate landscape buffer along the sides of this drive. null niNG FNCRQACHMENT The plans shown an apparent encroachment of two existing buildings onto Lot 4. This encroachment should be verified and appropriately resolved with the adjacent land owner. ftCPTin SYSTEM SETBACK The minimum septic field setback from existing wetlands and water bodies is 76 feet. Upon completion, the proposed drainage pond in the southwestern part of the site will act as a small pond or wetland and will drain to the southwest under Willow Drive. The septic field for Lot 6 is setback approximately 60 feet from the NWL elevation of this basin. - J • 121003 03/14/99 13:50 FAX 612 337 5601 DSU, INC.121004.Lot Th. eeptio fieW location, muat be fenced off and protected from construction activities. pPOSIQN CONTROL The developer must ensure that erosion control be provided, inonitored and ^iLlntalned wherever needed until the vegetative cover In the disturbed areas of each lot has been fully and finally restored. If you have questions regarding these comments, or if I can be of further assistance, please call me at 339-3300. DAHLQREN, SHARDLOW, and UBAN, INC. 76 of the I the Wallace L. Case, ASIA Landscape Architect/Planner 4- # • Hardcover Distance from Shoreline 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000’ Total Area in Setback 2,183 s.f. 6,654 s.f. 743 s.f. Existing Hardcover 35 s.f. (1.6%) 2,965 s.f. (45%) 670 s.f. (90%) Allowed Hardcover none (0%) 1,663.5 s.f (25%) 222.9 s.f (30%) 0 (35%) Proposed Hardcover 35 s.f (1.6%) 2,247.01 s.f (33.7%) 383 s.f (51.5%) Variance Requested none To permit 2,247.01 s.f To permit 383 s.f none 0-75' Lakeshore Setback The property owners have a small concrete walk located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback. The walk is located between the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka and North Shore Drive. This hardcover is legal and is allowed by Code. 75-250' Lakeshore Setback The har dcover on the property will show a decrease, however the amount of structural hardcover will increase on the property. The increase is a result of a larger home being built on the property. The existing house is 1,023 s.f and the proposed house is 1,299.25 s.f The garage and storage area would remain on the property. 250-500* Lakeshore Setback The applicants will remove a significant amount of hardcover from this portion of the property. Most of the hardcover being removed would be from the driveway. The garage has two parking stalls that would use a driveway 20' wide. The existing arrangement has a paved area adjacent to Birch Lane 44' wide. The City allows a maximum curb cu» of 20' for private driveways. The proposed changes would be a benefit to the City. B246S Bmct and B4tiy Nusbaum 3480 North Shon Drivo Voriances 3/ism Pagi3 Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 9,560 s.f Existing: 1,683.00 s.f Proposed: 1,959.25 s.f 17.6% 20.49%• The proposed addition would raise the total structure above the allowed coverage for the lot. The Zoning Code allows a maximum 15% of the lot to be covered with structure or 1,500 s.f, v^chever is greater. This lot would permit 1,500 s.f Variance STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP The applicant's have included their statement of hardship as Exhibit B. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. ISSUfiS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The lot is provided with sanitary sewer service. North Shore Drive is platted through the applicants property. One side of the property is located on Lake Minnetonka (vacant) and the house is located across North Shore Drive. The entire lot is combined into one tax parcel. The platted right-of-way for North Shore Drive is dedicated to Hennepin County and is not included in the lot area calculation for hardcover or structure. Hardcover on the lot will be decreased substantially. Structure will be increased, and will exceed the 1,500 s.f allowed on the property. The curb cut on Birch Lane is 44 s.f It will be reduced to meet the maximum allowed by the City (20 feet). The proposed location of the house is beyond the 75’ required for structure from the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. 92468 Bntea and B*tsy Nutbaum 3480 North Short Drhn Vartencts 3/IS/99 Fatih 7.The existing house is located on the east property line. The new structure will be located within the setbacks established for the zoning district. 8.Applicants intend to retain the two car garage and lean to storage building that is located on the property. 9.Additional structure has been requested for living space due to the high water table in the area that prevents the lot from accommodating a basement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission has the following alternatives to consider. To recommend approval of the application as submitted based the applicant's Statement of Hardship. B. To recommend denial of the application based on structural coverage exceeding the 1,500 s.f. allowed for new construction. C. To amend the application. Staff recommends alternative B to deny the application based on the structural coverage exceeding the 1,500 s.f allowed for the lot. However ^e Planning Commission may want to consider the location of North Shore Drive as a hardship. The platted County right-of-way is not considered part of the lot; secondly, the lot has a high water table that prevents the lot fiom accommodating a basement. The applicants have stated in their Statement of Hardship the high water table limits the amount of living space available to them. 92468 Bruce and Betsy Susbaum 1480 North Shore Drive yarlances S/iS/99 Pages i I Attachments A B C D E F G H I J K Application Description of Request and Statement of Hardship Site Plan/Survey Plat Map Location Map Site Topography Hardcover Worksheets Elevation Views Floor Plans Property Owners List Permit Record i^2468 Bmct and Bttsy Susbaum 3480 North Short Drtvt Variancts 3/13/99 Pagtb • ■> • • • •• • • %. *• •• #• T • • • • I ••• ••• m • : •/ ' f - f* Cixy OF ORONO - VARIANCE ’^PLICATIOISf / .Initial Application Fee $250.00 .($50.00 per each, addition^ vmancc) Renewal Variant Fee ^ $1.50'00. (no change fiom original applira^oii) * Varimce for non-confoii^g structures' $250.00 After-the-Fact Feiw . (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Address 3H0O AApplication #. / Date Received Z~ IT- ? ? Amount P^d. .^2,S 0 ^ .A p>p)\fcA’V crw C,o>vvp\*tte • ; OliC^ 1 »l FJ XJII Property Identification Number 08—QQI3 Attach legal description -----inriiuted on reouired surv< Date PropsS^cquired. Attach legal description t^ppfi^tio^i|N^t included on required survey. I (do) ^^^^^abo own Ae^a^Jent p^els of land. (month^ear) y residential other (specify),Present use of pro] ZoningDistrict:. 7)nVC O^VNER (if d^erent than applicmit) Name____________________ Phone (home). Phone (work).V..3. Address:City:.Zip:, DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ^ Esiim^ Constm Describe request in detail: AJ^tO ^ ‘^onte^ ^ Constmetion CoA$ ZoO^ooO t . r I (attach additional sheets .if necessary) VARIANCES REQXJIRED Lot Area ^ Lot ^idtii ;y Hardcover Lot Coverage j,. Setback:Front Side Rear JC Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPtlON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventmg compliance with Zoning Code requirements:. (attach additional sheets if necessary) Monday February 22, 1999 First Draft To: Paul E. Weinberger Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Orono received FEB 2 2 1999 u »* orono Paul. We have put together some of our thoughts on the plans we submitted to you last Wednesday, and would like you to look them over and share them with the staff. We would like to here back as soon as possible as to what the general feeling is toward this project. We very much appreciate your time and effort in this matter. The following is a list of hardships we would like you to consider for the approval of our revised building plans. 1) We have compiled with city setbacks which will have far less variance deficiencies than the existing structure. 2) The existing foundation is not sufficient for a remodeling/addition project 3) Because of the water table on the site, we are unable to have a basement figured Into the overall square footage of livable space, meaning a potential loss of 33% of such space for storage, etc. 4) The size of the house is not out of character for Balder Park Extension which is comprised of mostly 50 foot wide lots. 5) The current zoning laws do not include 50 foot lots, which puts us in total non conformance. Zoriing of said lots needs to be revised to bring them current with the times. 6) Over the last 5 years we have incurred substantial hardship due to the dties misgrading of Birch Lane. This is a water drainage problem which we have discussed with both the previous city engineer and the present engineer. We feel to mitigate, the city needs to: a) correct this problem b) allow building plans Bruce and Betsy Nusbaum 3480 North Shore Drive cciGabbriel Jabbour, Mayor & /'n Q it’ A m SUB!* ’V ✓ 37S o$-in \ \ \ V N K I CUI \#o aV EBJIN $T gCNRSr^NC oil S/A •••* »nim mm co^ "»0 400 II ICIM, :<Cb«nef^^V>t r-r ri -. V ■^V^A toMEnn g iv-.r:!f^^vix':.Ur>CASTUl Line •v'v vr^ % * V .^ -V •ATS DI m r «4^ • ^* ••• —'•f' ^ ^ <iS r ^sll Forest. Xi^“. •-<••• -A' if^mpn WNITE _ • • •■ «: 1^ . r'J - DAHL 00^ *- ssii^C*A a ‘ A’-'-\X•irsviit'-T *V •< I AW&stri?;'iL^ * -s>,’K-SArpi’^ •.**^0 M -.fX iw.:c-c>»::*5.^WJ Point * :I Mr \HpEr<r iM J 60^ JtONHS tWOlT SJ^iG •ICKSOII AVI 0 AO o «o i ,*| %— . «• Spring P^.L ^tNOAfUm O GI3II , MINNETONi .•ju rrV^J.;* • ' V" V' ‘^zLafcnet~--4TT J tf • V - .' '^\r^/^>-.r.:- ^vaBjE cT Lot HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ^75*^75-2i'0’250-500' F.yiSTINt; HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House S.F. Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B ____ ? V X 100 - ppnPOSF.n HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X m m D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B ____X 100 - S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. •S.F. S.F. " % A B • • • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ♦ B ____X 100 - •SJ. ' S.F. ' % A B HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’75-250*250-500'500-1000* pvigriNC HARDCOVER IN ZQJtE A. House ______________ Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B X too ppnPOj}Fn HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House --------------------- * Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Paiio/Dcck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ■f B X 100 - 4*7 S.F. SJ. SI. SI. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. £i23 —S.f* S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. . - DQ__y* ''c»rU. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. • S.F. A ■ S.F. B ‘ % A h 'v2U '%j^ I ^ WEST ELEVATION^/^•^ = r-o" o M " ^ -f / t :;va y •) 5.;? .<r^ «r^ d %j^ EAST ELEVATION 1/j;’ = r-0" # O A fT Ju O»or» V NORTH ELE\/ATION 1/*“ = r-o" 4 -r i . ’•V) »- 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/tf" * 1-0" t*.__ O .> •*.. I of 1 ( e . 1**-A«tS^----------------------------------- / i/ £ '"'4... ; ^ ' ^ •*/ • >• . .* -XI •- ^ - . .*r: & * V'** •••• '-. • * • ■ FIRST FLOOR PLAN 3 3 cC.Z=a J fZ V • a nO:, r.-. •! rr:V • / . j / >; • •'.‘V • • / «• SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1 1 r MM DATE 08/11/98 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORHATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OMNERS LIST REPORT NO. PX43S401 PACE 9 8ATCN B04 PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 58 08-117-25 45 0001 05470 BXRCH LA T’ N SERNARO 8 L K 8ERNAR0 THOMAS H lERNARO 5470 8XRCH U MAYZATA MN 55591 58 08-117-25 45 0002 05490 BXRCH LA E LXLJE4UXST 8 S LXLJEOUXST ERXC J 8 SHELLY R LXLJEQUXST 3490 BXRCH LA MAYZATA MM 5S391 30 08-117-25 43 0003 01448 BALOUR PARK RO J N 8 H R UMRENCE JAY H 8 HARLXS R LAHRENCE 1448 BALOUR PARK RO MAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 08-117-23 43 0008 03510 NORTH SHORE OR D 8 J SXKKA DALJXT 8 JASMXNDER SXKKA 5510 NORTH SHORE DR MAYZATA NN 55591 38 08-117-23 45 0012 03470 NORTH SHORE DR HAROLD J BROUELLETTE HARtNJI J BROUELLETTE 3470 NORTH SHORE DR MAYZATA HN 55591 38 08-117-25 43 0015 03480 NORTH SHORE DR BRUCE A NUSBAUH BRUCE A NUSBAUH 5480 NORTH SHORE DR MAYZATA HN 55591 PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 08-117-23 43 0014 03490 NORTH SHORE DR KENTON H CARLSON ETAL KENTON H CARLSON 3490 NORTH SHORE DRIVE MAYZATA NH 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0015 03490 NORTH SHORE OR K 8 D CARLSON KENTON N CARLSON 3498 NORTH SHORE OR MAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0023 05450 BXRCN LA E R EN6LER '8 8 ENBLER EOMARO R 8 BONNIE ENOLER 3450 BXRCH LA MAYZATA HN 55391 PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODk 38 08-117-23 43 0024 03448 NORTH SNORE OR JON ERLER JAMES 8 NARY ERLER 3448 NORTH SHORE DR MAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0025 03450 NORTH SHORE DR A K EVANS 8 N K EVANS ANY K 8 NAOHX K EVANS . 3458 NORTH SHORE DR MAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0024 03449 NORTH SHORE.DR RONALD TRUMAN CLOUD RONALD TRUMAN. CLOUD 3440 NORTH SHORE DR MAYZATA HN 55391 PROP AODR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 38 08-117-23 43 0027 03440 BXRCH U D S 8 D K XNQVALSON 00U8LAS 8 DEBORAH XN6VALS0N 3440 BXRCN U MAYZATA HN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0028 00038 ADDRESS UNASSX6NED HENNEPIN PORPEXTEO LAND CITY OP ORONO P 0 BOX 44 CRYSTAL BAY HK ■ 55325 TOTAL BATCH 504 00014 .L PERMIT RECORD Permit Ho.Date Type of Permit 8^7 -fe£>U4II 5Wa g a . I^Oo/ULiii fe/n£^ija]ct-) /039S 6-/J. ?y /I/!^/Lyuu^ TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator RE:#2471 Orono Independent School District #278 800 Old Crystal Bay Road (to be assigned) Conditional Use Permit-Public Hearing EXHIBITS: A B C D E F G H I * Application Amhitect's letter Legal Description Plat map Property Owner's list Zoning map Comprehensive Plan maps Stormwater permit application Reduced plan sets Planning Commission receiving blueprints Zoning:RR-IB Comprehensive Plan: Application: One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Institutional/Urban Service Area The Orono Independent School District #278 is proposing to construct a new middle school and a new site circulation plan for the Orono High School. The middle school will serve 675 students in grades 6-8. The school building will include a varsity gymnasium, cafeteria, lecture room and media center. The school building will be approximately 115,000 gross square feet and two stories in height. This application will also require the following actio..s: 1. City to vacate easements across Outlot A (See Exhibit D) 2. School district to legally combine the separate tax parcels 3. Land alteration permit to grade the site/MCWD permits 4. Assign an address to the new middle school (800 Old Crystal Bay Road North) »247l Orono Middle School Conditional Uu Permit March IS. 1999 pap-l PARCEL INFORMATION Property Identilication Numbers: (Middle School) 38 28-118-23-43 0006 38 28-118-23-43 0007 38 28-118-23-43 0008 3828-118-23-42 0005 38 28-118-23-42 0006 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 and 2, Block 1; together with Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2; together with Outlot A; all in Orono School Expansion, according to the plat thereof of record in Hennepin County, Minnesota. ZONING Minimum Zoning Requirements Lot Area Lot Width Front'Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Street 2 acres, dry buildable 200*50'50'30'50' Lot Size:51.39 acres The proposed middle school site conforms to the minimum lot area, lot width and yard requirements for the RR-IB zoning district. The allowed height is 2 1/2 stories or 30 feet. The applicant has indicated that the.height of the building varies from 32-42 feet above grade. The height limitations may be increased by conditional use permit when applied to parapet walls (less than 3 feet above the height of the building), cooling towers, and elevator penthouses. Zoning Requirements for Schools The RR-IB district is intended to provide an area for low density residential development and limited agricultural uses. Schools are allowed in this district as a conditional use. The athletic fields ai ; accessory to the principal school use. The Zoning Code requires that no building be located within 50' of any lot line and that open play areas be fenced with the fence to be located 15' from any property line. 92471 Orono Xflddle School Conditional lit* Permit March ti. 1999 pagt-2 1 Signage The sign requirements for conditional uses in the RR-IB district limits signs to 1 nameplate sign with 12 sq. ft. of surface area. The sign may be illuminated with flood lights and either diffused or direct The sign height is required to be lower than 8’ in height and at least 5' from the property line. Signage for traffic control or parking restrictions are not considered nameplate signage. At the time the school district determines their signage needs, a variance from the sign requirements may be necessary to allow adequate signage for the middle school. Parking The Zoning Code requires schools to provide 1 parking space for every 7 students and 1 additional space for every 3 classrooms. The school building is designed for 675 students. Classrooms are in 6 clusters with 4 rooms in each cluster. The plan indicates approximately 30 classrooms with additional larger rooms for band, vocal, art, special education, a technology lab, and media room. A lecture hall and gymnasium are also included in the plan. The Zoning Code requires 96 parking spaces based on the number of students. The additional required parking may be calculated at 1 for each of the classrooms. Under this scenario, 96 + 30 parking spaces for a total of 126 parking spaces are required. This method of calculation does not include tlie gym, lecture hall or larger special instruction rooms. The National Parking Consultants Council (NPCC) recommends that elementary and secondary schools provide 1 parking space for each classroom and other rooms used by students or faculty and an additional i/4 parking space for every student over the driving age. Using the NPCC standards the middle school would require approximately 68 spaces as no middle school student is able to drive. The school district is proposing to provide 121 parking spaces in the front of the building with 5 handicapped parking spaces for a total of 126 spaces. This meets the parking requirement based on the Zoning Code if the larger rooms are not counted and no r?dditional parking is required for the assembly and gymnasium area. The proposed plan includes a bus parking area for 25 buses that can provide 100 additional parking spaces for other activities when buses are not using the lot. The parking as proposed by the applicant is adequate for a middle school. The Zoning Code requires that each parking space be dimensioned at 9 ’ x 20' with handicapped spaces typically larger. The parking surface is to be paved with curbing. *2471 Orono Midd!* School Conditional Use Firmlt M(^ch 15» 1999 pate-3 . • Loading Berths The Zoning Code requires schools to provide 1 loading berth 25 ft. in length for each building with 1,000 - 10,000 sq. ft. For buildings over 10,000 sq. ft. an additional loading berth 50 ft. in length is required. The requirement for the middle school is a 25 ft. loading berth and a 50 ft. loading berth. The proposed middle school plan appears to meet the intent of the Zoning Code ordinance. A service area at the rear of the bus loading area provides a 16’ wide paved lane to the boiler room and cafeteria area. This area will be adequate to allow trucks serving the cafeteria to maneuver in and out of the campus without interfering with the faculty parking area. Deliveries to the school should not generally occur when the bus parking area is in use. Smaller delivery vehicles will use the drop off area in front of the school building. Lighting The Zoning Code requires that parking areas are prohibited from having a direct source of light visible from the right-of-way or adjacent land. The school district has provided a lighting plan for the parking area that mdicates the location of light poles ?5' in height with .5 and 1. footcandle line measurements. The lighting plan is under review by the City's landscape architect. The athletic fields shall not be illuminated. At the City Council's work session, the Council suggested that the lighting standards be similar to the 12' light standards in the City Hall parking lot. Landscaping • • The Zoning Code requires conditional use permit applications to provide a landscaping plan with planting schedule. A landscaping plan has been provided and is under review by the City's consultant landscape arcliitect. His comments will be provided at the Planning Commission meeting, or earlier. TOPOGRAPHY There are numerous small wetlands on the site. The highest elevation is near the southwest comer of the site near Old Crystal Bay Road North. The lowest elevations on the site are in the wetlands. The elevations change from 1,034' near the soutliwest comer to 1,000' in the wetlands. The site w ill be graded to provide a building pad for the two story building. The street side of the building will allow students to enter from the parking lot to the upper level. The upper level floor elevation will be 1036' and the lower level floor elevation will be 1023'. The area for soccer, football and baseball fields will be graded. Several wetlands on the site will remain. The required wetland §247 1 Orono Middle School Conditional Use Permit March 15. 1999 page-^4 • ( setback is 26'. The school district has applied to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) for the appropriate permits for grading/filling and stormwater management. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT t The applicant will be changing the grade of the site to pro\ide a building site for the 72,976 sq. ft. footprint of the middle school. Grading will also be necessary to provide the softball, football, and soccer fields behind the middle school. A NURP pond is proposed at the north side of the bus parking area. This plan is being reviewed by the City Engineer and will also be reviewed by the MCWD. The MCWD is expected to review this plan at their March 25th meeting. According to the school district's application to the MCWD, .902 acres of wetland will be filled with 14,000 cubic yards. The conditional use permit includes this amount of filling for land alteratio.n. A land alteration permit will also be required. SEWER AND WATER The school district has submitted a plan for connecting to the City's water tower. The details of the utility plan is located on page Cl.5 of the plan sheets. The City Engineer is reviewing the plan. Staff will provide his memo at the Planning Commission meeting or earlier, if available. The sewer and water connection charge is estimated at 75 umts for the school at $8,900 per unit. ACCESS The proposed access to the middle school is proposed to be provided by two driveway curb cuts on Old Crystal Bay Road North. The southerly curb cut is proposed to be 24' wide to serve the faculty parking area and drop-off lane. The northerly curb cut is 30' wide to accommodate buses and is directly across ftom the curb cut for the other school buildings on the west side of the road. Pedestrian traffic between the middle school and the rest of the school campus is anticipated. The proposed plan proposes sidewalk connections across Old Crystal Bay Road adjacent to the driveway curb cuts. The City Council discussed at a work session the need for pedestrian traffic controls. More detailed information about the student crossing areas and traffic control measures will be required. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS The Planning Commission may recommend approval of a conditional use permit if the application meets the following standards’ M247 1 Orono Middle School Condlllonal Use Permit March 15, 1999 page--5 1. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and the Comprehensive Municipal Plan; 2. That the proposed location of the conditional us and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The application meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and conforms to the minimum zoning requirements for a school in the RR-IB district. The {q)plicant may need to make plan modifications per any comments received from the landscape architect and the City Engineer as reviewed and recommended by the Plannin Commission. More detailed information regarding signage may be required at a later date when the school district determines their signage needs. The Planning Commission should discuss the following issues: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Height of the lighting standards for the parking lot; Fencing or screening for the play fields and prohibition of lighting the fields; Height of the building at 32'-42' Parking and circulation plan with traffic control measures for pedestrians Landscape architect’s comments City engineer’s comments •1 §2471 Orono Sfiddle School Conditional Use Permit March IS. 1999 pagi-^ r A Application# ! Date Received '/'l' ^ 9 \moimt Paid __ CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION -TO AA&I(dKJ60 ”<300 Oljp PROPERTY LOCATION TO Be Site Address (POST QFFICF^ 685 Ql 0 r.RYSTAl RAY RflAH---------------------------------- APPLICANT ^^0"® -------------------------- Nam^ INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #278 Phone (work)- - - - - - --- - - Address 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NO. City LONG LAKE/^A^.__Zip 55356-004£_ K.U. bUX 'lb OWNER (if different than applicant) /'C^/ ^-7 Address ^/)<r ST' m^srRaBr City ST ■ PAVL'jUM—Zip ^q-/Ol=^ Date Property Acquired ____________________—----------------------- I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PER>nTS - $ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP apphcation S175.00 Residential Accessory Use X $250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) $225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $250.00 Land Alteration Grading and filUng - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 7 5' of lake^hore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) _____After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee (month/year) ?■^7 OTHER APPLICATIONS , r x $250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $300.00 Vacation $200.00 Easement Vacation _____$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - re^er to fee schedule) $350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ~ $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule ir •» •-V - c !! ,j a f I :■! i i '1u <(S3 SB £ar February 17, 1999 Michael P. Gaffron Senior Planning Coordinator 2750 Kelly Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 Re: Independent School District #278 New Orono Middle School Commission No. 98111 305 St Peter Street St. Paul , MN 55102 651.227.7773 FAX 651.223.5646 715-H Tollcate R oad Elgin . IL 601 3 847.608.2600 FAX 847.603.2654 NET: http//WWW.WOLDAE.COM Orono High School Site Circulation Improvements Commission No. 99016 Dear Mr. Gaffron: Independent School District #278 is pleased to submit the attached Conditional Use Permit application for the new Orono Middle School and new site circulation at Orono High School. The new 6-8 middle school features educational space for 675 students plus varsity gym, cafeteria, lecture room and media center. These spaces total 115,100 gross square feet in accordance with the referendum. The middle school vehicular access drives corresponds to the intersections serving the high school. The improved high school site circulation paving improves pedestrian safety including a pedestrian crossing at the high point of old Crystal Bay Road (flashing lights have been discussed), increases parking for staff and students, and eliminates traffic conflicts between students and bus traffic by using a bus corral of 25 buses. Vehicular access to the high school from Old Crystal Bay Road is in the same general location as currently exists, but with perpendicular intersection. The attached documentation supports the conditional use application as well as items referenced in section 10.09, Subd.. 3 of the Orono zoning ordinance: 1 . The middle school is 1 1 5,000 gross square feet and two stories. 2. The building height varies: two stories plus parapet totalling 30 feet above grade on rear side of building; and two stories plus enclosed mechanical penthouse on front sid^ of building totaling 45 feet. These numbers are in accordance with sections 10.21 and section 10.75M of the zoning ordinance. It should be noted that the front side of building is partially below grade (and the giade varies) reducing the height above grade to approximately 32-42 feet. i 1 J X - ^ CQ Offftuntty Bm/lpyer Micheal P. Gaffron Page Two 3. Schematic building elevations will be ptlDvided under separate cover prior to March 10, 1999. Respectfully submitted, WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS George Gorbatenko, Jr., AIA Enclosures: Schedule Of Drawings (City C.U.P. Submission Packet) Sheet C1.0 Boundary Survey and Topographic Survey-Junior High School Site Sheet C1,1 Partial Topographic Survey-Ice Arena/High School Site Sheet C1.2 Site Removals Plan Sheet C1.3 Middle School-Site Geometric Plan Sheet C1.4 Middle School-Paving, Signage and Striping Plan Sheet Cl.5 Middle School-Grading and Utilities Plan Sheet C1.6 High School-Geometric, Paving, Signage and Striping Plan Sheet C1.7 High School-Grading and Utilities Plan Sheet Cl.8 Middle School and High School-Landscaping Plan Sheet C1.9 Construction Details Sheet C1.10 Construction Details Architectural Upper Level Plan Architectural Lower Level Plan Site Lighting Legal Description (See sheet Cl.O) Certified Propert>' Owners List cc:Jay Pomeroy, AJA Pat Arug, Arug Environmental Kevin Sullivan Scott McQueen Susanna Strand jiiV990l6/feb99 'i--. 02/11/1999 22:11 5440531 AJA ASSOC., INC.PAGE 32 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C, PARCEL AREA: 2.238.631 square feet or 51.3919 acres. 3 T ‘ • oil s .;*v fit:(i| *1' “LV i-1 ' 'm i«u j B B • m c» _______4 » . ■ M ■ . •••> • • %?• 9 9 • • €^ • lie? mmmm vXv* ••••««m .\\\ . *•'•1• • • .‘•X*i • « • t • • • • « ;!vly .'•X* • • • • « % • • • • • X\*i• • • V.*.* • « « • * • ^ ‘•X*’. •X*: . 111". .'.‘W...■TVrv •Xy^X;X^^<<^^v^XV!•! Jx’:vX'x':*»:w:^ .................. yx':';%<-;'X<i:‘x'x-x'Ov ic>;xv:x:::rW^^ I M v-X • ■ • • t:;:S22S::;::.x:*^^•:.;.x<.>x-:':-:';-:::-:-;;:- •;-:-::-;'X.:-:>:;:.:.;'X-Xy:.:; . * * ' *-*-• * * ’" * * ■ • * • ; *■*■*•* i*«*«*<^ ¥* rf* •*•*•*• «*«■*•*•*•*•*•*•*•*•’• ^ *«*«*«%*■*»*«*«*« »*«*«*.*«*«*«^::::x;:;x:;;::.:;|i;;:;x;:;:x • ••«••••••«•«•••»•••* iPtVPaaPSPVtfPPappprpp*‘.•.v.*X*.*.v.v.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.‘.* ..•.w.........;.:.;.;.v.:.:.;.;.;.:.iv..;.;.:.;.;.:.;.;.^^^^^^^^^^ ;.;.::.::-Xsvx::x.;./x.:.: • •••••• *•*•%*•*»*•*• •«■*•««•«««•••, 9M ••«•••• «• ^ • • • • • • .! VcLcEr* 1i i3-iiS-a3-</D r.7.J9 I rJLXJMt. T ......fi • • * — . • : '•' ~Ai TfV^ •13: ■n.n > •-H I lii.VI I 1 I 1 LAH:T ’ • <■.> r.pk.bi:ipp nrr: . ^ RUN DATE 02/04/99 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY ZNFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PZ455401 PAGE 44 DATCN 509 PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 33-118*23 12 0002 02765 KELLEY PKWY CITV OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 38 33-118-23 12 0004 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN RD S WAYZATA HN 55391 38 33-118-23 12 0007 02700 KELLEY PKWY H R A CITY OF ORONO H R A CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN RD S WAYZATA m 55391 38 33-118-23 13 0011 02765 WAYZATA BLVD W VEDA INC ETAL VEDA INC PO BOX 375 LONG LAKE NN 55356 001 y38 33-118-23 21 0001 00765 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N SCHOOL DIST NO 11 ORONO SCHOOL DIST 8278 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 33-118-23 21 0002 00685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY SCHOOL DIST NO 11 ANOKA-HENNEPIN I S D NO 11299 HANSON BLVD N W COON RAPIDS NN 55433 m H I • 38 33-118-23 22 0001 03200 WAYZATA BLVD W S L KAPLAN ET AL TRUSTEES JANES W LUPIENT 7100 WAYZATA BLVD GOLDEN VALLEY NN 55426 38 33-118-23 23 0002 03025 WAYZATA BLVD W ROBERT E 8 KATHRYN DUNAS ROBERT E I KATHRYN DUNAS 3025 WAYZATA BLVD LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 33-118-23 24 0001 00595 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROBERT N WAGNER ETAL ROBERT WAGNER 595 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD H LONG LAKE NN 55356 RD N O: ■*5 . 38 33-118-23 24 0002 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED THONAS F Janes trustee THONAS F JANES TRUSTEE TFJ HONINEE TRUST 7707 T STREET LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 ^1 4 • TOTAL BATCH 509 00010 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. OAT rrY mm DATE 02/OA/99 BATCH SIB PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 28-118-23 31 0001 02940 SIXTH AVE N STONEGATE FARM INC STONEGATE FARM INC 6851 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 38 28-118-23.34 0003 00795 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD SCHOOL DIST NO 278 ORONO SCH DIST NO 278 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 45 38 28-118-23 41 0004 02500 SIXTH AVE N D M 8 H J ERICHSEN DIANE N ERICHSEN 2500 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE (Oi 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NA TAXPAYER NAME/ PROP ADDI OWNER NA^E TAXPAYER NAME/ADI PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 28-118-23 41 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASS16NED T 8 C CARRDLL THOMAS P CARROLL 2600 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE m 55356 38 28-118-23 42 0004 80038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ROGER A FAZENDIN ET AL LOU 8 JEANNINE BEASLEY 1265 MAPLEWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356-9530 38 28-118-23 43 0005 00770 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD ,N IND SCHOOL DIST 0278 (ORONO) ATTN SUPERINTENDENT IND SCHOOL DIST 0278 (ORONO) 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 5531 38 28-118-23 43 0008 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEO IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 H IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 ADMIN OFFICE- SUPERINTENDENT 685 OLD CAPITAL BAY RD N LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0007 02700 KELLEY PKWY H R A CITY OF ORONO H R A CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 28-118-23 42 0002 02700 SIXTH AVE N JOHN LEIN JOHN H LEIN P 0 BOX 177 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 28-118-23 42 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNEli INDEPENDENT SCHL DIST 0278 ATTN SUPERINTENDENT INDEPENDENT SCHL DIST R278 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 (8 28-118-23 43 0006 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ALBIN F THIES ET AL ORONO INDEPENOT SCH DIST 278 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 28-118-23 44 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO CENTER PROPERTIES ORONO CENTER PROPERTIES C/0 REIERS60RD LAW FIRM 4500 44TH ST W EDINA MN 55424 38 33-118-23 21 0001 00765 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N\ SCHOOL DIST NO 11 \ ORONO SCHOOL DIST R278 J 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N / LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 28-118-23 42 0003 02600 SIXTH AVE N T P CARROLL I C A CARROLL THOMAS P CARROLL 2600 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAKE l«( 55356 •W* «) na. C-"- 38 28-118-23 42 0006 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED IND SCHOOL DIST 1278 (ORONO IND SCHOOL DIST B278 (ORONO ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 28-118-23 43 0007 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 ADMIN OFFICE- SUPERINTENDENT 685 OLD CAPITAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 r.)' i . tl 1 * • i* *c > t/ 38 33-118-23 11 0003 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO PLAZA ORONO PLAZA C/0 REIERSGORD LAW OFFICE 4500 44TH ST W MPLS MN .'5424 \ ft ;s:. f TOTAL BATCH 510 00017 WOLSFELO LAKE LAND USE PLAN ^ URBAT. RESIOEMTIAL 1 ACRE Q URBAN RESIDENTIAL 1/2 ACRE ^ RURAL RESIDENTIAL 5 ACRES Q RURAL RESIDENTIAL 2 ACRES ■ CCmRCIAL ffl institutional■TTn Pjj. industrial El I" • .• ScaTtj-i SssSllrliC-iR-:Ci iy of Orono, Minnesota •• i:i TO; Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator RE;#2471 Orono Independent School District #278 795 Old Crystal Bay Road ( High School)) Conditional Use Permit Amendment-Public Hearing EXHIBITS: See Plan Sheets (C1.1,1.2,1.6, 1.7,1.8) Lighting Plan-unnumbered Zoning:RR-IB Comprehensive Plan: One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Instiiutional/Urban Service Area Application: The Orono Independent School District #278 is proposing to make improvements to the student and faculty parking lots for the high school. The school district also proposes designating a bus corral area and circulation plan that works together with the bus parking area for the new middle school. The proposed parking improvements encroach into the required 50 ’ front yard setback from Old Crystal Bay Road. A variance and conditional use permit amendment vdll be required for the proposed circulation plan and parking lot improvements. PARCEL INFORMATION Property Identification Numbers: (High School) 33-118-23-21 0001 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the North 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota §2471 Orono High School Conditional Us* Permit Amendment March IS. 1999 page-1 •. ZOmNG Minimum Zoning Requirements Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Street 2 acres, dry buildable 200''5C 50'30'50* The proposed circulation plan and parking areas do not meet the required 50' setback from the right of way for Old Crystal Bay Road. The student parking lot (94 spaces) at the south end of the submitted plan indicates that the paved parking area will be located approximately 28 from the right* of-way. The parking lot with 88 spaces in front of the building is proposed to be located approximately 40' from the right-of-way. A variance is required to allow the parking areas to encroach in the required yards. Zoning Requirements for Schook The RR-IB district is intended to provide an area for low density residential development and limited agricultural uses. Schools are allowed in this district as a conditional use. The Zoning Code requires that no building or parking area be located within a required yard. The Zoning Code requires that each parking space be dimensioned at 9' x 20' with handicapped spaces typically larger. The parking surface is to be paved with curbing. Lighting The Zoning Code requires that parking areas are prohibited from having a direct source of light visible from the right-of-way or adjacent land. The school district has provided a lighting plan for the parking area that indicates the location of light poles 35' in height wit and 1. footcandle line measurements. The lighting plan is under review by the City s landscape architect. At the City Council's work session, the Council suggested that the lighting standards be similar to the 12' light standards in the City Hall parking lot. Landscaping The Zoning Code requires a landscaping plan with planting schedule. A landscaping plan has been pfQyj(jg(j flnH is under review by the City s consultant landscape architect. His comments will be provided at the Planning Commission meeting, or earlier. 02471 Orono High School Conditional Use Permit Amendment March IS. 1999 page-2 ACCESS The plan proposes to realign the curb cuts for the bus corral area and the parking lot in front of the high school. One driveway curb cut that provides access to the student parking area will be closed. The driveway openings will be improved to provide a perpendicular access to the street instead of the angled access currently provided. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS The Planning Commission may recommend approval of a conditional use permit amendment if the application meets the following standards: 1. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and the Comprehensive Municipal Plan; 2.That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements or improvements in the vicinity; and 3.That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION This application was noticed only as a conditional use permit and not a variance. The variance portion of the application needs to be properly noticed for public hearing. §2471 Orono High School Conditional Use Permit Amendment March IS. 1999 page-3 J liiil ' -.v.*.’.*.*.** fili TvXvXTvTvx:x:x:x-x:JVx-;vx*x;> ;-x-x<v:-:-:-;i:x%:x-x;:>mm• ••a******* »««%%»•« *.*.'»n\ v.*.*.'.*% •*. «*»*»•.*«. X*::x:xi::g:i;:x::;;:;< wmmmmmmmmmmm *•*•*•*•*•*■*•*•x-x*::-x::<•>x::xv>:; ...... .-X'X : ; :v: :-: :*: : : >::X': : x : :*/ - ^::;:::;:::$:x;:?;;:;::;:?;;x;x ‘x:; :::xx;::;>:x••>•:■^^^<^:•^x•x•x•^x:::.. r:-..:-v<o-x-x-Xv-::- ::x;; ;x-: :-:-XvX-xx<-:%;:v^^ >•.*! 11 I ■ 1 1 ..................................................................................... j ;ati ■■h,.- r.- ■ *>■,;> 'JJ I » __________ BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK ^ I Bones troo Rosene m Anderlfk & I Associates Engineers & Architects March 15.1999 Elizabeth VanZomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re; Oronu Middle School File No. 139-2471 ©6516361311 03/15/99 11:35 0 :01/02 N0:968 ArVtv/nA tne it A/fnnutt'vr (*>pfOfrt4rnty Ctnploviff Ono O Oonrtfuu. rc • JOSep'^f. An:trriia •'f • M.tr # ri L jm ft • RirhAfdi ru'ncr. Pt •OirnrtR Cool •Rnf.i 'tO Vh.jochi a QuufUuh. PC • RoUarrt W f?Cit*nf. Pt fnh Sut^n M C f A Srr*. n c ’ f^ti.'r ASSOCfiHe Hou^imJ A SAnrerC PC •«i*ifhA ltf,nu n Of • Putiirft R PfeffCfiiJ. P| • Picna^O W fnitrr. Pf • O.^viu O Lcihoi.-i ft • * •rn»\ri aia • M.i»» A ha*sica Ft • Mithatl T ffputmpnn. Pf • K ririu pc • K«nncfh r Ah'H ruin bf , n P£ , iCliJrivy P MWII'Aiviion fk . I S • &ol»»*rf I* • Agnct M (Itnrj • Mm P P.n. Pf • AiMfiPick Schmidt. PC Si RoiKetttr. WuiniAf v» MamiI MN • Alt ^ iti Wpbiitt. wwwROhfltfno f om Dear Liz: We have reviewed the preliminary plans for the proposed Orono Middle School. The site Is located cast of Old Crystal Bay Road, south of County Road 6 and north of Orono City Hall in the southeast quarter of Section 28. Wc have the following comments In regards to engineering matters. 1. Accent: The proposed access locations appear to be acceptable. A pedestrian crossing should be shown at the south access. This location is near the crest of the hill and provide.! for maximum sight distances. .Signing, striping and lighting plans for this crossing should be submitted for review, ivde.sirian cro.sslngs at the northerly access should be discouraged. Geotechnical recommendations and pavement design should be provided for our review. 2. Sanitary Sewer: The plans show the invert elevation of the existing MH 1 at 101.3.3. The proposed upper and lower floor elevation.! for the school are 1036.33 and 1023.00 respectively. The sewer service from the school would flow into MH 2, which has a proposed invert of 1031 .1 8. Tlii.s design would allow for gravity service to only the upper floor of the school. The dc-sign would provide a 3.1 2-foot build for MH 2. The cxi.sting MH 1 invert is low enough to allow for gnivity service to both floors and provide adequate cover at MH 2 so that insulation wouldn’t be necessary and freezing wouldn’t be a concern. It is unclear why the propo.sed dc.sign docs not provide for gravity service to the entire building. The sanitary sewer schedule incorrectly identifies MH 2 a.s MH 1 . The sanitary sewer .schedule should be revised to agree with the plans. All sanitary and storm sewer manholes and catch basins shall have an exterior sealing sleeve as manufactured by Infl-Shield or an approved equal. The City standard solid casting for sanitary and storm manholes is 1642B, the plans Incorrectly show the casting number as R-1733. A note should be included in the plans specifying that sanitary sewer have 18 inches of clearance below the water main at all sonitary sewer / water main crossings. The connection to the existing sanitary manhole shall be core drilled and u rubber boot in.stalled. Insulation should be provided for all sanitary sewer with less than 6 feet of cover. 3. Water Main: Will the water main crossing Old Crystal Bay Road be jacked or ojsen cut? The nacthod of Installation should be specified. If the ro.^dway is open cut a street restoration detail and traffic control plan should be included in the plan set. All 1 2*inch volvcs should be buiierfly vuhes and o dciaii included in the plan set. One of the hydrants on the east side of the building should Iv moved to eliminate an approximate 30-foot gap In coverage near the center of the building. All hydr.inis should l5c u minimum of 50 feet away from the cxlcricr wail of the building. 4. Storm Sewer: We recommend that catch basins be provided at all four access l«x:ations. All stonn sewer should be reinforced concrete pipe. Wc recommend that the minimum pi|)e size for u storm sewer 2335 Weit Highway 36 • St. Paul. MN 55113 • 651*636*4600 ■ Fax; 651*636*13ll BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK ^6516361311 03/15/99 11:37 0 :02/02 N0:968 structure with more than two leads be 15 inches. Based on this, the 12-inch pipe downstream from CB 7 should be IS inches. Riprap should be provided at all storm sewer inlets and outlets. All fluied end sections should have trash guards. A drainage area map along with storm sewer and ponding calculations should be submitted for review. Outlet structure details should be provided. The propo.sed pond on the west side of Old Crystal Bay Road is shown outletting to un existing wetl.md. The outlet for this wetland and impacts downstream should be reviewed. Plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) for their review. 5. Easements: The plan set submitted to us did not include a plat drawing. Final platting should include 66 feel of dedicated right-of-way for Old Crystal Bay Road if It doesn't already. Drainage and utility ea.semenLs should be provided 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along all exterior lot lines, Drainage easements should be provided across all ponding ureas and drainage way.s. A 20-foot wide utility easement should be provided for future water main extension to tite east. The easement should be centered on a line located 30 feet south of tf>c south edge of the proposed soccer fields, extending from the east lot line to the proposed 12-inch water main. Permanent and temporary easements should be provided for the Hennepin Parks trail that is scheduled to be constructed this suntmer. 6. Financtiil Cuarantcet When the plans have been completed we will prepare an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. PIea.se contact me at 651 •604*4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Oreg Oiippa. City of Orono 3 Date of AppUcation:02/16/98 TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: RE: Exhibits: Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/ Zoning Administrator March 2,1999 #2463 George '>V. Stickney, having an interest in 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road Sketch Plan A B C D E Application Plat Map Proposed Subdivision Zoning Map Comprehensive Plan Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acres) Comprehensive Plan:Rural Service/Rural Residential District Lot Area:20.2 total acres, 18.9 dry acres §2463 Ctorge Stickney 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road Sketch Plan pagt-l Date of Application: 02/16/98 Proposed Lots: Lot Total acreage Total dry acreage Loti 2.0 2.0 Lot 2 2.8 2.8 Lot 3 2.5 2.5 Lot 4 2.2 2.2 Lot 5 3.0 2.4 Lot 6 2.25 2.0 Lot?2.35 2.05 Lot 8 2.2 Outlot ? Application: The applicant is propKising to purchase two parcc ’s, 250 and 430 Old Crystal Bay Road, to combine them into a 20.2 acre site for an 8 lot subdivision served by a private road terminating in a cul-de- sac. RR-IB Standards Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Street 2 acres dry 200'50’50'30’50' buildable All of the proposed 8 lots can meet the minimum 2 acre dry buildable lot area requirement. Lots 3, 4, and 5 do not meet the minimum 200' lot width requirement because their frontage is on a cul-de- sac and there is less than 200’ at the required 50' setback. 1^2463 Cforgt IV. Stickney 250 and 340 Old Crystal Bay Road Sketch Plan pagt-2 Date of Application:02/16/98 Septic Systems No septic reports have been prepared. Prior to filing a preliminary plat application, septic sites will need to be tested and reviewed. Park Dedication Fee The park dedication fee is determined at the time of preliminary plat. The lot with the house, Lot 2, will not be required to pay a park dedication fee. Engineering Issues The sketch plan has not been reviewed by the City Engineer. The City Engineer will need to review a preliminary plat for stormwater, drainage, and access issues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION To review the proposed sketch plan and provide direction to the applicant regarding lot size, road configuration, and lot width. •2463 Ccorff W. Stlchny 250 and 540 Old Cry ual Bay Road SkgtchPlan pagt-3 A Application # Date Received Amount Paid cnJ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address gL 9-3^0 Cr'^.rkl /iJ Property THentificationNumber flPIP^ 0 H Tn Z3 l3o0 0^_^ Please check one - Property____abstract or _____torrens? Attach legal description to application. OH m 2.'3 lyiioo / % i • APPLICANT Name__ Address City__ [j<rQ I ^ ,--------y ProOO^tt^ nr'j^o _______Phone (home) Zip X^«^Phone (work) OWNER (if different than aj^licant) Name ^ Addre^ ^hf Chy Oro-\ A.c> ^ V ^ 7Vt) oU ^fene (home) ^ip rsr^'^ar^AO Zip iSi£6Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District PROPOSAL 2- tty |P»n A<Acres Dry Land f.'l Ac. Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______ 'ZO. '2. A C\ • IG _________ Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) _____Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites Existing Units ^ New Units fp" Total Units CO CC Oi Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) 'T^AjSL Units per Zo 5Acres ii / I Sq. FtrDry BtriWabtgLand Residential Other (specify) • \ MINIMUM MATERIAL REQUIRLD FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Pajmeat of fees (refer to 'application fees” listed below. 2. Completed application form. 3. Preliminary plat information on Certificate of Survey. 4. Certified Proper^ Owners List of owners within 350' (you must obtain this list firom Hennepin Coun^ Department of Finance A-603 Go\t. Center 348-3271). 5. As an addendum to this application, please attach a ^arate list of any other persons you wish notified of this applicatioa Zoning Official's Signature __________^___________________________Date _________________________________ MINIMUM MATERUL REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE FINAL APPLlCA'nON 1. Payment of fees (refer to Preliminary Subdivision Approval resolution and park fees if appicable). 2. Signed Certificate of Survey or mylar copies of foimd plaL 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit Zoning Official's Signature ______________________________________Date _________________________________ L APPLICATION FEES (Zoning Administrator to check p(] those which apply) A. Application Base Fees: bC Sketch Plan Review (Class I. n&m) $250.00 _____ Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement $350.00 _____ Subdivision Application (Class I & II) $350.00 _____Preliminary Subdivision Application $375.00 + $25.00Aot (Class III & adl non-residential) _____ Final Plat Application (Class HI) $200.00 ____ Legal Review and Filing; ___ Subdivision only $75.00 Subdivision w/easements and covenants mirt $200.00 Totals Park Fees (to be determined per Section 11.62) . ■ Legal and Engineering Review Fees (as incurred) Renewal of Class I and II Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change fi-ora original application) •,/ Renewal of Class III, Preliminary Subdivision Application $200.00 (No change firom original application) _____Renewal of Final Class III Subdivision Application $150.00 (No change fix>m original application) B. Special Improvement Fees: ' ^ Propcaed Private Roads $600.00 + $.50/liiieal ft; s y „ *' Proposed Public Roads $900.00 + $.50/lineal ft; ~ Request for City to Accept Existing Private Road $900.00 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension $250.00 + $25/stub , lia ft X .50 « $. lin. ft X .50 “ $ I rv f Proposed Watermain Extension $250.00 + $25/stub » jr-Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) $200.00 On-Site System. Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) $50.00/per lot x new lots C. I^xlble Application Fees/Misc. Fees Variance $220.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) ______ _____ Easement Vacation Associated with Subdivision $100.00 _____ _____ PRD Application with Subdivision $30.00/Dwelling Unit _______ The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attome)’, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. l4-l^ / / Applicant's Signature x ^ _____________________________ Dat e ____________________ Owner’s Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City Office 25 days before the Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ZONING-D LLA5^N -crclc >\>MlN>gTONHa CoiM)i^Kqi)Sivi Plow E URBAN-RURAL SERVICE AREA UURBAN SERVICE AREA QRURAL SERVICE AREA ■—iMUSA/MSSR LINE land use plan tpl URBAN RESIDENTIAL URBAN RESIDENTIAL RURAL RESIDENTIAL Q rural residential P cohmercial g institutional industrial parks 1 ACRE 1/2 ACRE 5 ACRES 2 ACRES • % TO;Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator March 11,1999 SUBJECT: #2469/2470 500 Orono Orchard Road Sketch Plan Review and Variances Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acres) Lot Area: (Existing)38,346 s.f. Application:The applicant has proposed a lot line rearrangement for properties located at 500 and 540 Orono Orchard Road. Steven and Jo Webster, property owners of 500 Orono Orchard Road, have requested the City consider a lot line rearrangement, vacation of the alley, and variances to permit construction of a garage within the required yard setbacks. The 540 Orono Orchard Road lot is owned by Kent and Sandra Larson. To permit a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement the Larson’s must be a co applicant. They are not supportive of the change in access to their property. They would be required to construct a driveway with access from Orono Orchard Road. This property uses the alley for its only access. The Webster’s at 500 Orono Orchard Road have proposed a garage and residential addition that would place the garage on the property line adjacent to the alley. (Please see the attached site plan). The garage is required to meet a 50 ’ setback from the property line, however variances have been granted that allow structures to be located closer to the alley, but none have been approved that would place a building on a property line. ______ Pertinent Facts 1.500, 540 and 550 Orono Orchard Road all have legal access and rights to the alley. The portion of the alley located to the South have been vacated. 2.Replacement of the driveway for access to 540 Orono Orchard Road would require construction of a substandard driveway. The City encourages an 8% slope. Mike Gaffron has completed a cross section for the proposed drive that would result in a driveway slightly *2469/2470 500/540 Orono Orchard Road Lot Line Rearrangtineni/Vacaiion/l'arlances 3/15/99 Fagtl over 10%. The proposed driveway would require a 5* retaining wall on each side of the driveway, or a sideslope cut of as much as 16' on each side of the driveway to maintain a 3:1 slope. If the Larsons do agree to such an arrangement the City would require all driveway slopes to be located on their property. Thus the 12' of property to be given to the Larsons would not be adequate. A transfer of a minimum 44' would provide all proposed grade changes to be located on the 540 Orono Orchard Road property. The City would encourage the property owners to consider the sloping rather than retaining walls as they are easier to maintain. 3. 4. The Larsons would have to be a willing participant in the Lot Line Rearrangement. Before variances for the garage and additional living space can be considered the issue of access to the subject properties should be resolved. 5. 6. 7. The alley is currently maintained and plowed by the City. The Minnetonka Bluffs subdivision was platted in 1887. The Larson's must be a willing applicant as the City cannot force a lot line rearrangement or a change in access to the 540 property. ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards RR-IB (2 acre) Lot Area Lot Width Rear Yard Side Yard Street Yard Required 87,120 s.f.200'50'30'50' 500 38,346 s.f.150'50'30'50' 540 25,400 s.f 100'50'30'50' Sewer Units Both properties have been assessed and provided with sewer units. §2469/7470 500/540 Orono Orchard Road Lot Lino Rtarrongement/Vacation/Variances 5/15/99 Fagil Access The 540 Orono Orchard Road lot has access from the alley only. The property owners have stated they have no intention of changing access to their property. The alley is maintained and plowed by the City of Orono. STAFF RECOMMENDATION • Staff is recommending the requests be tabled until an access agreement is established by all affected property owners, and the applicant agree to waiving the 60 day review period to allow additional time to resolve the many issues with the proposal. I have had several recent conversations with the Larsons. They will not be available to appear at die Planning Commission meeting on March 15, 1999. Attachments A Application B Description of Request C Location Map D Section Map E Property Map F Site Topography G Site Plan H Elevation View I Floor Plan J Property Records K Permit Record §2469/2470 500/540 Orono Orchard Road Lot Ling Rearrangement/yacation/Variances 3/15/99 Faggy A Application# Date Received Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 Afler-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Son \r\r^/'X fKrI. Property Identification Number (P.I.D.I OZ- tt*i •z,3 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Pro perty Acquired__. /'7 I (do) (3o n@ also own the adjacent parcds of land. • Present use of property: -x^ residential ___pother (specify)________ Zoning District:_____________________________________________ (month/year) APPLICANT Name 3o PVc 6s>-fe..r- Address: City: Phone (home ! ^ /Z- ‘ ^X5- /^O ST Phone (work > -'3f£2r ________Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ^ V *N V Phone (hoqie) Phone (wor)t)_.\ Address:CityT Zip:. Estimated Construction Cost $ /Ocp, oo6 ^ i- "hci DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: ~/^ rT77C' ^o4~ ^.-7/ a L^cir..rt 1 ^t, ASt . ci- (attach additional sheets if necessary) ' VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width y' Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSUIP/DESCRlPTIOiN OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: f~loLs.s.c __Dt^.’ x /^cxf <nfl V.a vm L A'cCiU.S T^../ A(^^^ I, V Jc s. Oti I ----------------------------------------- (attach additional sheets if necessary) tc»nn< S S M >i^..^ V* -r . ^ -4 • .^f ^lI • iW r •*v‘ ••*■.JUkt:>^ •*!• *V.^ . r •• • 'V.^'. •-. i FlJUiOM. i • V ■ ^ . V. ^#> —^ «. • »•- . •» .•• . V% • S >- >7T ':'.' ^ r- '^. .■ r. .•:.. .* 1 ^ SEE MAP 76 ^ * ■■■■■• M « ' aiii" J7J ;- v * - • . • • *■ -iJ* V' *^ • * * '^- *• 2iLT*’ ______________ * ~~ •»<» ) 0Rene orta lARD nn ”5r -5T -TT >* "3T ~sr 301 ym ■r in 3 5^6» to th »*»<'s ^ r -____1 4 GO A — o # ty * M,’ CO lA BARRETT AVE "sS~s~TT ro — . oi V-—<» ^ ro— y'.. 59 r- .1 HANLON AVE oi £ 'd (jy • ••» X. AXtr" I orykV«>4’cc .• mn9s a rlARD • .' ■ * • r • • t .• .1 < , V. » .. laniiiuui II .1 •At • ' •. ** .-.v . r,% i’ ••' .••< -yr’i * •' .• •../ '•. %»*•• i-j X*;■ ••,. • A #• JW {•- . ..‘. •' . • .- . » -V- * r ”• • , •- • r. > -.• •' -•• V ; r -. • •-.. . j.-. • ;-n« »v.. f. r... •• V .. . • *. / V . , . r v *' V T *** «v^* ’*1 I*”'-• 'r?V '\’*V-'V^4f- r •;^'^ iiiii>)ii ifiiii ijifijii ■ III I III ijii I'lii Mil>lii I iiii III liiii ■ ill I III ■ III Sti |ii:Mil ■ • -ir' -v-;i1^: -. . jt I •■••• ■ III ■ ••• • tf * •♦'•»_•'• •!".• # J'* i* j*.*, ^^i| I ».l I III I ;il I III • HI II niii lip HI • HI ■iHl/ HI ijni lll••lll I Ilii Hli iiiO'lf J'iPj‘1sliiSiiill %l III I III i nil III mi I HI I III I nil ill I hi ij Biiy>ri'iii ijii I HI I’lii i iiiijii iiiii t ni Ijiiijii ij'i I l^Lo^HI I HI I III i Hlillil I HI I HI i nfi ill I HI f III i *> llliim III I Hlf iillHIl Hll Hli nil HII.I^^II p 'll I III I III • ^^'1 1 III ■ HI iliV*J'l*HI i>^‘riiij jyjJUBWgBWffgyg^gp^HngyW^WgPf^VvHi • m I III I DSlSnSi;! “ ms^- M»«a M*M»« •• f :f >^t HI ■ HI ■ HI ■S^y7ut • III I iifi'iif 9^^iiiIIIt'liiI IIIp'H ■ jii ■ HI I III i ill i I Call* ■••■•■••* ■•>• ••■• ■ II I III P HI PJil I Hfi'l^ HI ■ HI i Hi P HI ■ HI Hill iPJil I Hfi lO li P HI ■ HI nil • ■ ii« k lit B TTJ’ □a□0nn 9p^orm» OMMCPtfirtMkcxv mtMMCVMt • amgM^ Tsr^ •V* I______>-----■ ■ M K A* W^» •• «JB« N •« Ik * »•'««•« »0 •ijtmAmA ■••#•••• i* b Bi it riM< ^••^m *i .• Am umm iMf tt Am Am •• mmt^t Attmrn. m aA ^ mm» •• •»« •«« • •• •« »«••■<» M iNNer^^NJCA V t^a\. inc . 4POW T0M« H.. IMM TtO OwPmbmb ¥»i «Ti I #f7> ♦94 f 440 * #«7» r»4 490* MtVf 4 KO fW W> <» CL.' 'E^ CSV a?N5mJCtic;»'i 3 Haaiifl t %.• \ . 4 . v>;»" . j ’:•* ■ . •/«::/> . . . ■ ■' •■ ’*-Vn-'5' ■■■ ■■, . rr hY '• •' -> t-V-.V-t •‘ .•• ••. •. • •■-' k.» ’■‘'■'.’Al * ** * • .•• ••. ^ <v t-M-?.J mmm ■XiA': 16-FEB-1999 17:58:22 ========================= Hennepin COMPLETE Tax Report ?ID #: 0211723310046 PROPERTY TYPE; RESIDENTIAL T TAX YEAR; 1998 F operty Inforii;ation •.'••DRESS ITY/TWN •LAIL CITY SCriOOL DIS ADDITION LEGAL DESC .PARCEL SZ YEAR BUILT 540 ORONO WAYZATA ORONO MINNETONKA BL’TFS LOTS 19 20 AND 21 150 X 129.4 1915 BARRETT AVE ZIP: 55391-9606 LOT: ACRES BLK: .00 Ov.'ner/Taxpayer Information OWNER NAME: JAFFRAY ROBERT T JT OWNER : JAFFRAY VICTORIA H AXPAYER •'DRESS 540 BARRETT AVE ORONO MN 55391- Market Values LAND : BLDG : TOTAL: 44,000 114.000 158.000 Taxes •• Effective 1998 I Subrecord Values I BASE T/OC • 2,501.51 I WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK 2..30.58 , , ,, Sales RECENT DATE : 05/13/98 RECENT PRICE: 254,000 RECENT CODE : WARRANTY DEED PREVIOUS DATE : PREVIOUS PRICE: PREVIOUS CODE : Dwelling Characteristics Gross Sq Ft First Fir SF Secnd Fir SF Year Built Bedrooms Baths Family/Livg Rm Dine/Othr Rm Kitchen Fireplaces Heat Air 1477 916 561 1915 2 1 1 / / FORCED HOT AIR Bldg Style Stories Bldg Shape Bldg Cond Bldg Constr Roof Type/Cover Ext Wall Gar Cap/Type/Sf Deck/Patio Sf Porch O/S/G Sf Pool/Pool sf Lot Width/Depth Lot Zoning VERY GOOD N/A GAMBREL / METAL METAL / / / / 150/ / 128 Bmst »> ROOM SCHEDULE «< 1st_ _ _ _ _2nd_3rd i I P,.pa«l*h^r WEBSTER STEVFf^, CRS on Fmbniarv 19.1999 16-FED-1999 17:50:35 ===’Hennepin COMPLETE Tax Report PID # : 0211723310006 PROPERTY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL TAX YEAR: 1998 Property Information ADDRESS CITY/TWN MAIL CITY SCHOOL DIS ADDITION LEGAL DESC PARCEL SZ YEAR BUILT 550 ORONO WAY Z AT A ORONO MINNETONKA BLUFFS LOTS 6 7 18 AND 19 100 X 256 1915 ORONO ORCHARD RD ZIP; 55391- LOT:BLK: ACRES .00 M Owner/Taxpayer Information • • OWNER NAME: NELSON LAWRENCE E JT OWNER ; TAXPAYER ADDRESS LAWRENCE E NELSON 550 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA MN 55391- Market Values LAND : BLDG : TOTAL: 53,000 53,000 106,000 Taxes - Effective 1998 I Subrecord Values BASE TAX : TAX W/ASSMT: 1,417.94 I WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK l!437.44 I DELINQUENT; CURRENT I GREEN ACRES/OPEN SPACES: NO Sales RECENT DATE : RECENT PRICE: RECENT CODE : 01/26/90 91,000 PREVIOUS DATE : PREVIOUS PRICE: PREVIOUS CODE : Dwelling Characteristics Gross Sq Ft 880 First Fir SF Secnd Fir SF Year Built Bedrooms Baths Family/Livg Rm Dine/Othr Rm Kitchen Fireplaces Heat Air 712 168 1915 3 1 / / 1 1 GRAVITY Bldg Style Stories Bldg Shape Bldg Cond Bldg Constr Roof Type/Cover Ext Wall Gar Cap/Type/Sf Deck/Patio Sf Porch O/S/G Sf Pool/Pool Sf Lot Width/Depth Lot Zoning VERY GOOD N/A GAMBREL / METAL METAL 1 / DETACHED / / / / / 100/ 270 312 96 >>> ROOM SCHEDULE <<< WFnxTFR STEVEN. CRS on Febnary 19 ,1»9 g. To The Planning Commission of ORONO; i, V At) tJcL)3ie<_, have no future interest in using the platted alley from Dickenson to my property * would have no objections to the vacating of the alley, Sincerely ^{JaAjj/slL. lcCc.(6}jtc^ L Print iulcfo'’'S''iC^ Dale d?-/6 - 6-FEB-1999 17:50:35 rss! Hennppin COMPLETE Tax Report ID # : 0211723310049 PROPERTY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL TAX YEAR: 1998 roperty Information DDRESS ITY/TWN AIL CITY CHOOL DIS DDITION .EGAL DESC ARCEL SZ EAR BUILT C>ROMO ORCIIAP.D RD500 ORONO WAYZATA ORONO MINNETONKA BLUFFS LOTS 1 2 3 22 23 AND 24 150 X 256 1947 ZIP: 55391- LOT: ACRES BLK: 13 .00 )wner/Taxi.:.yer information )WNER NAME: WEBSTER S & J JT OWNER : :axpayer \DDRT::SS STEVEN S & JO ELLCN WEBSTEK 500 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA mm 55391 ■larket Values LAND : BLDG : TOTAL: 50.500 72.500 123,OOC Taxes - Effective 1998 I Subrecord Values I ^C5E TAX • 1,754.21 I WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK T^ W/^SMT: 1,776.84 I DELINQUENT: CURRENTTAX W/ASSMi. ACRES/OPEN SPACES: NO Sales RECENT DATE : J2/29/93 RECENT PRICE: 129,900 RECENT CODE : PREVIOUS DATE : PREVIOUS PRICE: PREVIOUS CODE : 11 Dwelling Characteristics Gross Sq Ft 1336 First Fir SF Secncl Fir SF Year Built Bedrooms Baths Fami ly/Livg Rm Dlne/Othr Rni Kitchen Fireplaces Heat Air 1336 1947 2 1 1 / / 1 1 6 FORCED HUT /MR Bldg Style Stories Bldg Shape Bldg Cond Bldg Constr Roof Type/Cover Ext Wall Gar Cap/Type/Sf Deck/Patio Sf Porch O/S/G Sf p->ol/Pool Sf Lot Width/Depth Lot Zoning EXCELLENT N/A GABLE / PITCH & GRAV* WOOD 2 / DETACHl.0 / 528 / / / / 150/ 220 __ >^_RQOM_SOiEDyLE_<<< Pripm.^.pyLmBSTmsiMy?f*> MrvndP^jm. To The Planning Commission of ORONO: I, ________, have no future interest in using the platted^lley from Dickenson to my property ai^7o for access. I would have no objections to the vacating of the alley. Sincerely j If/-I 0 Sign / \ / Print Date 16-FEB-1999 17:50:35 ======-™- Hennepin COMPLETE Tax Report PID # : 0211723310011 PROPERTY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL TAX YEAR: 1998 Property Information ADDRESS CITY/TWN 1-IAIL CITY SCHOOL DIS ADDITION LEGAL DESC PARCEL SZ YEAR BUILT 570 ORONO WAYZATA ORONO MINNETONKA BLUFFS LOTS 16 AND 17 100 X 127.8 1947 ORONO ORCHARD RD s ZIP: 55391- LOT:BLK: ACRES :oo•Ovmer/Taxpayer Information OWNER NAME: HAWKINSON ROGER J JT OWNER : TAXPAYER ADDRESS ROGER J HAWKINSON 570 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 Market Values LAND : BLDG : TOTAL: 42.000 83.000 125,000 Taxes - Effective 1998 I Subrecord Values I BASE TAX : 1,649.26 | WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK TAX W/ASSMT: 2,066.46 I DELINQUENT: CURRENT I GREEN ACRES/OPEN SPACES: NO Sales RECENT DATE : RECENT PRICE: RECENT CODE : PREVIOUS DATE : PREVIOUS PRICE: PREVIOUS CODE : Dwelling Characteristics Gross Sq Ft : First Fir SF Secnd Fir SF Year Built Bedrooms Baths Family/Livg Rm Dine/Othr Rm Kitchen Fireplaces Heat Air 2050 1336 714 1947 5 2 1 / / 1 1 FORCED HOT AIR Bldg Style Stories Bldg Shape Bldg Cond Bldg Constr Roof TVP«/Covor Ext Wall Gar Cap/Type/Sf Deck/Patio Sf Porch O/S/G Sf Pool/Pool Sf Lot Width/Depth Lot Zoning GOOD N/A GAMBREL / METAL STUCCO 1 / DETACHED / 292 / 29 / / / 100/ 128 292 »> ROOM SCHEDULE «< Ptmnandbv: WEBSTEH STEVEN. CRS on To The Planning Commission of ORONO: I / rW h / /\ . have no future interest in using the *—^ ------------------------------- - 'VJ rOY for access. Iplatted alley from Dickenson to my property at, would have no objections to the vacating of the alley. Sincerely 0- »/rcfie-^ Sign / Print 76m9f 16-FEB-1999 17:52:50 #12 PID # Hennepin COMPLETE Tax Report 0211723310010 PROPERTY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL TAX YEAR: 1998 Property Information ADDRESS CITY/TWN :-IAIL CITY SCHOOL DIS ADDITION LEGAIi DESC PARCEL SZ YEAR BUILT 1390 EOX ST ORONO WAYZATA ORONO MINNETONKA BLUFFS LOTS 13 14 AND 15 127.75 X 150 1920 ZIP: 55391-9326 LOT: ACRES BLK: .00 Owner/Taxpayer Information OWNER NAME: WITCHER JONATHAN D JT OWNER : WITCHER GRETA M TAXPAYER ADDRESS 1390 FOX ST ORONO MN 55391- Market Values LAND : BLDG : TOTAL: 44.000 66.000 110,000 Taxes - Effective 1998 I Subrecord Values BASE TAX • 2,57 6.22 | WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK •PAX W/ASSlir: 2,596.46 I Sales RECENT DATE : 10/12/98 RECENT PRICE: 123,700 RECENT CODE : WARRANTY DEED PREVIOUS DATE : PREVIOUS PRICE: PREVIOUS CODE : Dwelling Characteristics Gross Sq Ft First Fir SF Secnd Fir SF Year Built Bedrooms Baths Family/Livg Rm Dine/Othr Rm Kitchen Fireplaces Heat Air 1470 861 609 1920 5 2 1 / / 1 WATER 1 1 Bldg Style Stories Bldg Shape Bldg Cond Bldg Constr Roof Type/Cover Ext Wall Gar Cap/Type/Sf Deck/Patio Sf Porch O/S/G Sf Pool/Pool Sf Lot Width/Depth Lot Zoning / 128/150 _ _ _>» ROOM SCHEDULE <<<_ _ _ _ WE BSTER STeVEN.Cti S on F9bni»nt 19, W» AVERAGE + N/A GAMBREL / METAL STUCCO 1 / DETACHED /280 / / /76 To The Planning Commission of ORONO: _, have no future interest in using the platted alley from Dickensm to my property a* I an for access. I would have no objections to the vacating of the alley. Sincerely, ,) J L-r Sign if Print Date 16-FEB-1999 17:55:10 PID # Hrnnrpin COMPLETE Tax Report 0211723310013 PROPERTY TYPE; RESIDENTIAL TAX YEAR: 1998 Property Information ADDRESS CITY/TWN '•lAIL CITY SCHOOL DIS ADDITION LEGAL DESC PARCEL SZ YEAR BUILT 500 ORONO WAYZATA ORONO MINNETONKA BLUFFr: HANLON AVE ZIP: 55391-9636 50 X 129.48 1949 LOT: ACRES BLK: .00 •( Owner/Taxpayer Information OWNER NAME; BENNETT P & M JT OWNER : TAXPAYER ADDRESS PAUL A & MEGAtl M BENNETT 500 HANLON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391-9636 •larket Values 1 1 Taxes - Effective 1998 1 1 Subrecord Values LAND :37,000 1 1 BASE T/OC :1,483.25 1 1 WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK BLDG : TOTAL: 80,000 117,000 1 1 TAX W/7\SSMT:1,503.36 1 1 DELINQUENT; CURRENT GREEN ACRES/OPEN SPACES: NO Sales • RECENT DATE :02/25/97 PREVIOUS DATE :07/10/91 RECENT PRICE:125,000 PREVIOUS PRICE: RECENT CODE :WARRANTY DEED PREVIOUS CODE : Dwelling Characteristics Gross Sq Ft i 1: 1710 Bldg Style Stories First Fir SF 1080 Bldg Shape Secnd Fir SF 630 Bldg Cond AVERAGE + Year Built 1949 Bldg Constr N/A Bedrooms 5 Roof Type/Covor GAMBREL / METAL Baths O Ext Wall METAL Family/Livg Rm / 1 Gar Cap/Typo/Sf // Dine/Othr Rm /Deck/Patio Sf 320 /32 Kitchen 1 Porch O/S/G Sf // Fireplaces Pool/Pool Sf / Heat FORCED HOT AJR Lot Width/Depth 50/128 Air Lot Zoning >>ROOM SCHEDULE <<< _ Bmst 1st 2nd ..3rd Pnoartdby: WEBSTER STFVEN, CRSoil F0t>rvary 19.1$f$ To The Planning Commission of ORONO: platted alley from Dickenson to my property at for access. I have no future interest In using the 16-FEB-1999 17:52:50 *====-====================- - -=““ Hennepin COMPLETE Tax Report PID # ; 0211723310009 PROPERTY TYPE: RESIDENTIAL TAX YEAR; 1998 Property Information ADDRESS : 1380 POX ST ZIP* 55391-9326CITY/TWN : ORONO ^JIP. MAIL CITY : VJAYZATA SCHOOL DIS ; ORONO Bljc- 13 ADDITION : MINNETONKA BLUFF.> LEGAL DESC : LOTS 10 11 AIM) I : . PARCEL SZ ; 150 X 127.75 ACRES . YEAR BUILT : 1920 Owner/Taxpayer Information • \ OWNER NAME: MEYER HERBERT D JT OWNER : TAXPAYER ADDRESS HERBERT D MEYER PO BOX 12 WAY Z AT A MN 55391-0012 Market Values LAND : BLDG : TOTAL: 44.000 87.000 131,000 Taxes — Effective 1998 I Subrecord Values I BASE TAX • 1,912.72 1 WATERSHED: MINNEHAHA CREEK TAXW/ASSMT: 1,936.82 I DELINOOEHT: CURRENT I GREEN ACRES/OPEN SPACES: NO Sales _ _ _ _ _ RECENT DATE : RECENT PRICE: RECENT CODE : PREVIOUS DATE : PREVIOUS PRICE: PREVIOUS CODE : Dwelling Characteristics 1 Gross Sq Ft 1701 First Fir SF Secnd Fir SF Year Built Bedrooms Baths Family/Livg Rm Dine/Othr Rm Kitchen Fireplaces Heat Air 1134 567 1920 4 2 / 1 / 1 5 FORCED HOT AIR Bldg Style Stories Bldg Shape Bldg Cond Bldg Constr Roof Type/Cover Ext Wall Gar Cap/Typ©/Sf Deck/Patio Sf Perch O/S/G Sf Po-)l/Pool Sf Lot Width/Depth Lot Zoning GOOD N/A GAMBREL /METAL STUCCO 4 / DETACHED /750 / //48 / 129/150 »> .sruEDULE «< __ Pitf>«9d by: xtpvfn, CRSonFHtrumv 19. TEVEN S & JO ELLEN WEB .00 OR-)NO ORCHARD RD S AYZATA MN 55391- SiNDRA S LARSON 1540 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55356- Syo OPxcWo Of^CC(A?»H -[^p LAWRENCE E NELSON 550 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA MN 55391- OGER J HAWKINSON 70 OR-.'NO ORCHARD RD S AYZATA MN 55391- Pnpai9d bv: WEBSTER STEVEN. CRS on Ftbniaty 19.1H9 540 BARRETT AVE 540 BARRETT AVE ORONO MN 55391- ORONO MN 55391 540 BARRETT AVE ORONO MN 55391- 540 BARRETT AVE ORONO MN 55391 Pnoandbv: WEBSTAR STEVEN. CRS on Ftbniarv 19. W9 i __'■* n I ■ I TinniBMiliM ■ I'nTfcii ^oo (Q^o^o 7^cJ ^ PERMIT RECORD Permit No. tnfTf Date Type of Permit _. jD JmOiAiA ___ • woo “7-51^'fir/ * 3 _ _________________ ______________________________________ 4540 •Cj%117'W--^/ _____ *7)1/ _ _ .K1 d€! l-^-^b (2?-A6 iU 9s?)?j !o-n - ‘71 /<» /oo/n ' _________________________—r. » - ^—A--------------- /0 03X.3-/7-9/' ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 ROLL: The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Chair Elizabeth T. Hawn, Lili McMillan, Alternate Jeanne Mabusth and Alternate James White. The following represented the CHy Staff: Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, City Planner/Zoning Administrator Elizabeth Van Zomeren, Assistant Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, and Recorder Lanette Wolf. Acting Chair Hawn calied the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. (#1) #2456 CITY OF ORONO. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT. LR-1C-1. ONE FAMILY LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT. SECTION 10.26. SUBD. 3. TO ELIMINATE THE ALLOWANCE OF A 50% INCREASE IN DWELLING UNIT DENSITY. FROM 2 TO 3 UNITS PER ACRE, 6:30 p.m. - 6:55 p.m. Gaffron presented the staff report. He stated that the City Council adopted an interim moratorium in May 1998 temporarily suspending use of the 50% density credit in the LR-1C-1 zoning subdistrict. This moratorium was established due to a development proposal that Council believed would add too much traffic to the locai streets, and would add to the high volume of traffic that is already overburdening County Road 15. The properties zoned LR-101 are located along County Road 15 in Navarre and adjacent to marinas on County Road 51 on Maxwell Bay. He said the existing neighborhoods surrounding these areas were developed prior to the City's adoption of the zoning regulations, and are generally developed much more intensely than would be allowed under the current zoning regulations. He said the Councii is concerned that the current density credit language does not provide sufficient discretion to the City to ensure a development is planned in such a way that it provides sufficient open space, landscaping and access options to somewhat balance the intensity of the surrounding development and minimize the traffic impacts. Gaffron displayed a map showing the location of properties that are zoned LR-1C>1. Gaffron stated that the LR-1C-1 density credit allows a 50% increase in dweliing unit density over the LR-1C District. The LR-1C District requires a minimum lot size of 1/2 acre, which translates to a maximum dwelling unit density of 2 units per acre. A 50% increase in density yields 3 units per acre. Gaffron said the number of multi-family dwelling units that might be develop^ or redeveloped in the existing LR-1C-1 zones under the current code is less than 20. He said the City has provided for significant numbers of multi-famiiy dwelling units in its Highway 12 Corridor. Gaffron said an alternative to total elimination of the LR-1C-1 district is to retain the ability to use a PRD (Planned Residential Development) to enable clustering and attached units. This would allow up to 4 attached units and would retain the ability to have a variety of housing types, but at a lower overall density than the current code allows. Gaffron stated that staff has drafted two options. Option 1 would delete language allowing 50% density credit, add language specifically allowing attached dwelling units as a Conditional Use, but only if Council determines the PRD provisions are met, and add a provision to limit density to two dwelling units per acre. Option 2 would delete Section 10.26 in its entirety and rezone all properties in LR-1C-1 to LR-1C. Gaffron stated that the property owners within the LR-1C-1 districts as well as property owners within 350 feet of those districts have been notified by mail of this public hearing. There were no public comments Hawn stated that two tetters were received from residents who were in favor of limiting the density. She said that the Commission members should consider whether they want to recommend a change. If they do recommend a change, will they recommend a change in which the zoning is reverted to Page 1 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 LR-1C or will they consider some change to the LR-1C-1 , keeping attached housing as a viable alternative. Mabusth asked staff if this special section is needed because of the requirements made of a developer under Section 10.56, Subd. 19. regulations for development of PRDs within the Shoreland District. Gaffron said Section 10.56 is the Shoreland Ordinance and the PRD regulations within Section 10.56 would make it difTicult to do a density that might be commensurate with the LR-1-C1 on a property located directly on the shoreline because it requires liering' which acts to limit overall density. Mabusth noted that the impervious surface standard is 50% for the total property and in the LR-1C-1 district, it says that beyond 100 feet there shall be no more than 35% impervious surface. Gaffron displayed a map showing the location of the property that would be affected by the Shoreland District standards. Mabusth asked if the Council specifically asked that the 50% density credit be removed. Gaffron said yes. McMillan asked for clarification of four attached units. Gaffron said it would be a building having four separate dwellings in it with four separate entrances. Mabusth asked if staff received any phone calls from the property owners on the north side of Shoreline Drive. Gaffron said he received one call. White questioned Paragraph D. regarding the hardcover. Gaffron said that paragraph has not been changed since 1675. He said the Commission could take this opportunity to make it more consistent with the zoning in the rest of the City. It does conflict with the Shoreland District ordinance and Orono's hardcover ordinance which say that from 75-250' you are allowed 25% hardcover. Hawn said it would be good to remove the 50% credit, but she would like to keep the opportunity for attached housing. Mabusth concurred with Hawn. McMillan asked about the duplex law. Gaffron explained the duplex law. White said he wants to keep the provision for attached housing. Hawn said it also permits the preservation of land area and limHs hardcover. Hawn asked if the Commission members are in favor of eliminating the 50% credit. Mabusth said the Commission should follow the Council's diredion and eliminate the 50% credit in the LR-1C-1 . She thinks that attached dwellings would be allowed under other sections of the code. She said certain sections of this code may be in conflict with Section 10.56 of the Shoreland Ordinance. Gaffron said that this code would be superseded by the Shoreland Ordinance in the areas that are less than 1,000 feet from the lake. Page 2 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (Ml) #2468 OTY OF ORONO, ZONING CODE AMENDMENT, LR-1C-1 - Continued Hawn asked if this code should be reviewed based on the Shoreland Ordinance. Gaffron said this matter could be delayed for further review before the moratorium expires. Mabusth said it would be beneficial to look at Section 10.56 of the Shoreland Ordinance to see if there are some sections in the zoning code that are not needed. Gaffron said for purposes of that review, he would take some sample real properties within the district and show how Section 10.56 would apply and what then becomes possible under those standards. McMillan moved, White seconded a motion to table application #2458 City of Orono, Zoning Code Amendment, LR-1C-1, One Family Lakeshore Residential Subdistrict, Section 10.26, Subd. 3. to Eliminate the Allowance of a 60% Increase in Dwelling Unit Density from 2 to 3 units per acre. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#2) #2469 CITY OF ORONO, ZONING CODE AMENDMENT. TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE, 6:66 p.m. • 7:10 p.m. Gaffron presented the staff report. He said there is a need to clarify and correct certain provisions of Ord. #161,2nd Series which was adopted in May 1997. Gaffron reviewed the impact of a list of changes that were made to the ordinance. He said the impact of items 9 and 10 is that antenna strurtures are no longer allowed as a conditional use in the B-1 District and antennas are no longer allowed as an accessory use in B-1. These two items act to make all existing antennas in the B-1, B- 3, B-4, B-6 and Industrial district antennas non-conforming and make B-1 and B-3 antenna structures non-conforming. This is because no new accessory antenna provisions were adopted for B-1. He said that Section 3 of the proposed ordinance will take care of this problem by allowing accessory antennas and amateur short-wave antennas/towers in these ‘B* districts under the same conditions they are allowed in the Residential districts. Gaffron said the impact of Hem 11 is that Personal Wireless Service Antennas and Towers are allowed as a highly-regulated use in the B-1 and B-3 districts and also in the B-4, B-6 and Industrial districts if H is an accessory use in B-1, only when placed on a municipal structure, but there are no municipal structures in the B-1, B-3, B-4 or Industrial districts. He said Council ’s intent was to allow Personal Wireless Service antennas on the two CHy water towers. The Navarre water tower is in the LR-1C district. The only municipal structure in B-6 is the well house. Since the City does not want a PWS antenna or tower on the well house, then this item should be dropped. Section 1 of the proposed ordinance deletes the portion of the ordinance that allowed PWS antennas and towers in the B districts. It also re-enacts the portion that adds qualifying language to the Public Services condHional use. Section 2 deletes the ‘Antenna Structure' uondHional use from B-1 in the same way it was deleted in all other districts. Gaffron said the impact of item 14 is that existing Industrial antenna structures became non- conforming. He said that was not the intent and H is resolved by Section 3 of the proposed ordinance. Gaffron said staff recommends adoption of the proposed ordinance which adds the ‘Accessory Antennas' and ‘Amateur Short Wave Radio Antennas and Towers' provisions into the B-1 list of accessory uses, rescinds Section 8 of Ordinance no. 161 2nd Series and correctly re-adopts the first three provisions of Section 8, and adds the 'Personal Wireless Service Antennas and Towers* provisions into the LR-1C list of accessory uses. Page 3 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (M2) #2459 OTY OF ORONO, ZONING CODE AMENDMENT, TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE- Continued Gaffron asked the Commission to comment on whether antenna provisions shouid be added to the B-2 and B-5 districts. There were no pubiic comments. Hawn asked if the Commission members wanted to comment on whether there shouid be changes made to the B-2 and B-5 districts. Mabusth said the question is whether such structures shouid be allowed in the Shoreland district. She asked staff to show the location of these districts. Gaffron displayed a map showing the B-5 and B-2 districts. White questioned whether B-5 and B-2 districts have no antennas controls or they are not allowed any antennas. Gaffron said they are not allowed in the B-5 and B-2 districts. If they are allowed, they need to be regulated. Mabusth asked if the structure could be as high as 65 feet. Gaffron said there are limitations and he is not sure if 65 feet would be the maximum allowed. Mabusth asked what would be allowed if the code is amended. Gaffron said it would be same as the other B districts. White said he would not recommend a change in the B-2 or B-5 districts. Gaffron explained the height requirements. White moved, McMillan seconded, a motion to adopt An Ordinance Amending Orono Zoning Code Sections 10.25 and 10.40 and Amending Ordinance No. 161,2nd Series Pertaining to Regulations for Construction and Placement of Telecommunication Towers and Antennas. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#4) #2440 DALE GUSTAFSON, ON BEHALF OF ROBERT LUX, 1209 FRENCH CREEK DRIVE, VARIANCE, 7:15 p.m. - 7:25 p.m. Dale Gustafson and Ed Suarez. Gustafson Design of Golden Valley, were present. Weinberger presented the staff report. He said this application is for variances to permit the construction of swimming pool and terrace area with a patio to the rear of the existing residence. The proposed pool would be located 28' from the rear property line. He said the lot is located in the French Creek Subdivision which was developed as a Planned Residential Development (PRD) south of French Lake. There is a 150' setback requirement from French Lake because it is a Natural Environment lake. The proposal would place the swimming pool and patio arei within the 150' structure setback. The proposal meets all hardcover and structural requirements and it does not have an unfavorable impact on the neighboring properties. Staff recommends approval of the variances. He said the applicant will be returning for a conditional use permit to complete a landscape pond at the north end of the property. Page 4 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 m) #2440 DALE GUSTAFSON. ON BEHALF OF ROBERT LUX, 1209 FRENCH CREEK DRIVE, VARIANCE ’ Continued Mabusth asked about the locations of the alternate and principal septic sites. Gustafson responded that the existing septic is iocated to the ieft side of the house. The alternate is in the front to the left of the driveway. Mabusth asked if the landscape pond has a purpose. Gustafson said there is a natural pond there now that must be realigned and the size adjusted because of the placement of the pool. Mabusth asked if the homeowners association has reviewed the landscape plan. Gustafson said the homeowner’s association has seen the entire plan. There were no public comments. White said he had no questions. McMillan said that French Lake is an environmentally strong lake. She is in favor of the application despite the fact that it is within 150' of French Lake. She asked about the drainage for the pool water. Gustafson said it is a contained system. McMillan said she has concerns about the pond because of its proximity to the lake. She does not object to the pool. Mabusth asked if a pool house structure will be necessary. Gustafson the pool equipment will be incorporated under the patio. White moved, McMillan seconded, a motion to approve Application #2440, for Dale Gustafeon, on behalf of Robert Lux, 1209 French Creek Drive, for variances from the Natural Environment structure setback of ISO* and from the rear yard setback requirement of 35* established by Resolution Number 1692 to allow a swimming pool and patio area to be located 91’ from French Lake and 28’ from the rear property line per the site plan dated January 21,1999. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#5) JOHN ERICSON, SR.. 1620 SHADYWOOD ROAD. VARIANCES. 7:26 p.m. • 7:38 p.m. John Ericson was present. Weinbeiger presented the staff report. He said the applicant is requesting variances to permit the construction of a 20' by 12' boathouse to be located 20' from the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. The applicant requests to replace a boathouse removed in 1981. On July 27,1981 the Orono City Council denied after-the-fact variances to permit major structural repairs to a lakeside boathouse that existed on this property. Mr. Ericson had started repairs to the boathouse without obtaining permits for the work. A stop work order was issued by the City requiring Mr. Ericson to apply for variances to permit the work. At the time the stop work order was granted, the top story of the structure had been elevated and the foundation was removed from below. The Code does not allow major repair for non-conforming structures. They are allowed to continue until the useful life of the structure has been exhausted. Page 5 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (M) JOHN ERICSON, SR., 1620 SHADYWOOD ROAD, VARIANCES • Continued Weinberger said that this application requires variances to permit a structure within 75’ of the lakeshore and within the average lakeshore setback. It would also require a variance to allow additional hardcover within the 0’-75' lakeshore setback where no hardcover is normally allowed. Weinberger showed a diagram of the proposed boathouse. Weinberger said staff is recommending denial of the application based on no apparent hardship. Allowing development of the structure would be an adverse impact to Lake Minnetonka by compromising water quality and have a negative visual impact for adjacent property owners and from the lake. John Ericson talked about the City requiring him to remove the old boathouse. He questioned why the City allowed other structures to be built close to the shore and he cited examples. There were no public comments. Weinberger said the neighboring property owner, Dorie Finn, 1620 Shadywood Road, did contact the City and she said she was not opposed to the proposed boathouse. White questioned the size of the concrete slab. Ericson said there is an existing concrete slab. He questioned why the Council allowed a boathouse to be rebuilt on Casco Point. Weinberger clarified why the Council allowed the boathouse on Casco Point to be rebuilt. He said the life cycle of the structure was not exhausted prior to the damage sustained in a May 1998 storm. Wind damaged the roof and deck, whoch would be allowed to be replaced with a building permit under normal circumstances. However, the deck replacement would be over a foundation that does not meet current building code standards. Therefore, the foundation was allowed to be repaired before the deck and roof were reconstructed. Ericson said he did not believe the life cycle of his boathouse had been exhausted when he was required to remove it. White said he is willing to make a motion to deny this application and Mr. Ericson will have an opportunity to present his case to the City Council. Hawn agreed with White and said there are two issues. One, was it a correct decision when Mr. Ericson was forced to tear down his boathouse in the first place, and two, is it appropriate to have new construction. White moved, Hawn seconded, a motion to deny Application #2453 for John Ericson, Sr., 1620 Shadywood Road, based on no apparent hardship that would require an accessory building to be located along the lakeshore and over another portion of the property. Allowing development of structure would be an adverse impact to Lake Minnetonka by compromising water quality by allowing new structure in the 0>76* lakeshore setback, and having a negative visual impact for adjacent property owners and from the lake. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Page 6 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (#6) #2464 OREO AND MARCIA BARNUM, 160 MCCULLEY ROAD. AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 7:39 p.m. - 7:47 p.m. Marcia Bamum was present. Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She said the property has 179' on Bayside Road and the length of the lot follows McCulley Road. When the property was platted, the address of ISO McCuliey Road was assigned; however, the front of the lot Is the narrow end on Bayside and one of the issues to be addressed is whether or not to recommend that the address be changed. Van Zomeren said the applicant contacted Hennepin County and obtained a driveway access permit from Hennepin County. As the driveway was being installed, they discovered debris buried on the property. A land alteration permit is required because more than 500 cubic yards was disturbed. The City Engineer. Tom Kellogg, reviewed the plans. He questioned the purpose of the stockpile of dirt and he wanted to ensure that the septic sites were not disturbed. Van Zomeren said staff does not believe that the septic sites have been damaged or disturbed. Van Zomeren did not receive any public comment except from one neighbor who was concerned about the distance of the driveway located from the intersection. Access from McCulley Road is not feasible to achieve an 8% slope or less for the driveway. Sandy from Diversified Const, said the stockpile of dirt will be used for fill around the house. Mabusth asked when the applicant plans to get the building permit for the new residence. Sandy said they applied for the building permit and it will be issued after this matter is settled. Mabusth asked if the applicant would have a problem with the Bayside address. Bamum said it would not be a problem. The entrance from Bayside is much more gradual than from McCulley. There were no public comments. McMillan said the driveway entrance from Bayside would be a much better option than McCulley. She said the applicant should not have to pay after-the-fact fees for this application. Van Zomeren said that the conditional use permit is needed because as the project progressed, more than 500 cubic yards of dirt was moved around. It is not known how much dirt would have been moved around for the driveway if conditions had been typical. The existing conditions on the site that were unknown led to the problem of the amount of soil that was being moved. David Dunn, a neighbor, said he feels another driveway on Bayside creates an additional traffic hazard. He asked if there could be additional signage for a hidden driveway. Mabusth said Bayside is a county road and Mr. Dunn should contact the County Highway Department regarding signage. Page 7 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (m) 10464 OREO AND MARCIA BARNUM, 160 MCCULLEY ROAD, AFTER-THE-FACT CONDmONAL USE PERMIT- Continued Whits moved, McMillan seconded, a motion to approve Application #2454 for Greg and Marcia Bamurn, 150 McCulley Road, for an after-the-fact conditional use permit for land alternation subject to: 1. 2. 3. 4. Review of the septic sites to ensure that they were not disturbed. Determine an end date for the stock pile. Change the address to a number on Bayside Road (4760). Applicant to obtain a land alteration permit There should not be a double fee for the application. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#7) #2455 ROGER AND KRISTINE 8TRAUMAN, 123 CHEVY CHASE DRIVE, VARIANCE, 7:48 p.m. - 7:50 p.m. Roger and Kristine Strauman were present. Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She said the appiicants are ret^j^’sling a lot area variance to remove the existing residence and construct a new residence. The iot is approxiinateiy one-haif acre. Staff recommends approvai of the lot area variance. Roger Strauman said he has talked to the neighbors and they do not object to the proposal. There were no public comments. White moved, McMillan seconded, a motion to approve Application #2455, Roger and Kristine Strauman, 123 Chevy Chase Drive, for a lot area variance. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#8) #2457 DAVID AND PAULA UNDBERG, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD, VARIANCES, 7:51 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. David and Paula Lindberg were present. Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She said the appiicants propose to tear down the existing house and construct a new house and garage. The surveyor has submitted a revised site plan that would eliminate some the variances. One of the concerns that staff had is that the driveway was not sized to allow for an adequate back out area. The surveyor did redraw the driveway to provide the applicant with a better backing out area. All of the structural hardcover is located in the 75-250' setback. Van Zomeren displayed the elevations for the proposed residence. The proposed residence is different that the O’Keefe proposal. The lot has the 0’-75 ’ setback requirement on two sides. In this plan, the garage is detached and located closer to the street and more of the hardcover is put into structure rather than driveway. Structural coverage on this proposal is 4,804 sq-.'are feet or 15.12%. The variances that this application would need are for hardcover in the 0'-75 ’ setback for the driveway, and hardcover in the 75 ’-250’ setback. Grading for the driveway would require a conditional use permit because it is within five feet of the properly line. She also recommend^ that the conditional use permit language reflect that the topography be restored where the foundation Is removed. The appiicants had no comments. Page 8 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 m 1*2467 DAVID AND PAULA UNDBERG, 13S2 BALDUR PARK ROAD, VARIANCES Continued Julie and Mark VerSteege, neighbors to the north, said they want to make sure the runoff stays on the applicant’s property, and does not drain into their basement. Mabusth asked if the applicants have submitted a grading plan. Van Zomeren said the plan was submitted to Tom Kellogg, the City Engineer. He said to make sure silt control fences are used. The City Engineer’s first reviev.* did not flag any major concerns. Mabusth asked if the surveyor has confirmed that there is no iverage lakeshore setback problem. Van Zomeren said yes. Hawn asked if the applicants have looked at reducing the structural coverage by 40 square feet. David Lindberg said they are willing to reduce the structural coverage. McMillan questioned the detached garage. Lindberg said an attached garage would require a larger driveway and addHional grading. McMillan suggested repositioning the garage in order to reduce the slope and improve safety. Mabusth questioned why the O’Keefe application was so much lower in hardcover in the 75 ’>250* setback. Lindberg said the O’Keefe’s had more driveway and a smaller garage. Mabusth asked how the other commission members felt about the hardcover in the 75 ’-250 ’ setback. Hawn said this is a difficult site. She would like to see the structural coverage reduced by 40 square feet. Mabusth asked staff to review the variances that would be needed with the current plan. Van Zomeren said they would need a variance for the 0’-75 ’ setback on the south side, a variance in the 75 ’-250 ’ setback to allow 33% where 25% is allowed, a conditional use permit for grading within five feet of the property line and re^oration of the topography. McMillan asked about the O’Keefe’s plan and what the amount of hardcover was in the 75'-250 ’. Van Zomeren said it was 5,725 square feet. Mabusth asked if the garage design would match the house. Lindberg said the garage would match the house. Mabusth said the Commission would have a problem approving 33% hardcover in the 75 ’-250 ’ setback. She asked about the hardcover that would result from the porches. Van Zomeren reviewed the square footage of the hardcover. She said they would need to reduce 1,000 square feet to meet the 25% requirement. Paged ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 m) 1t24S7 DAVID AND PAULA UNDBERQ, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD, VARIANCES > Continued Hawn recommended that the applicants reduce the size of the porches. Mabusth suggested that the applicants work with staff to reduce the amount of hardcover. McMillan said the hardcover for the driveway in the 0'-75’ is a necessity. She wants to make sure the driveway is safe. In the 75’-250', she is inclined to approve something similar to the O'Keefe application. Van Zomeren said the hardcover required is a matter of design, not hardship. The porches contribute significantly to the hardcover number. Mabusth feels the design could be changed to meet the hardcover requirements. She recommended they meet with their architect and work on the design. Hawn told the applicants they need to meet the 15% structural coverage and reduce hardcover so that it is close to 30%. McMillan recommended they look at the design of the garage and driveway approach. She does not want them to eliminate hardcover in the driveway and reduce safety in order to add more building hardcover. Paula Lindberg asked if it would adversely affect their application to make a more gradual slope for the driveway. McMillan said she looks at the driveway as a hardship because she does not want them to have an unsafe driveway. Mabusth recommended they have their final grading plan ready when the application comes before the Planning Commission again. Hawn asked if the applicants need to give their permission to extend the 60<lay time limit. Van Zomoren said staff would send the applicants a letter regarding extending the 60-day time limit. She wanted to make it clear that it is difficult for staff to advise applicants on the square footage that might be approved because every variance is different. Hawn moved, McMillan seconded, a motion to table Application #2467,1392 Baldur Park Road, for variances and a conditional use permit until March 15,1999. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Recess. 8:30 p.m. - 8:35 p.m. (#3) #2398, WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WAYZATA BLVD. W., CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT, 8:35 p.m. - 8:50 p.m. Louis Oberhauser was present. Weinberger presented the staff report. He said the Wayzata Country Club has recently developed a master plan for the entire golf course. As part of the master plan, the Wayzaia Country Club applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit for reconstruction, relocation or addition of tees for each of holes #1-18 and reconstruction, relocation and addition of bunkers along fairways and around most of the greens. The third phase of the project is the expansion of three pond areas on the property. The City approved a conditional use permit to complete the work on the tee boxes and bunkers Page 10 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (M9) 02398, WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WAYZATA BLVD. W., CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT - Continued throughout the Country Club. However, the conditional use permit did not approve the plans for the ponds and requires the applicant to return with detailed plans for pond construction. Weinberger said the application is to expand the ponds on hole #6 and hole #12. Staff Is concerned about the material that wilt be removed from the ponds. On hole #6, the dredging will result in approximately 17,000 cubic yards of fill. It will be stockpiled on the Country Club property. On hole #12, the dredging will result in approximately 5,500 cubic yards of fill which will be stockpiled. Weinberger said the DNR has stated they do not have any opposition to the proposed project, but have requested any additional drainage be diverted away from the Luce Line Trail. It is clear from the plans the total volume of the ponds will increase and drainage will not be impacted. Weinberger said that in addition to the conditional use permit, a variance is needed for grading within a City protected wetland on hole #6. He said the Minnehaha Creek Watershed district and the DNR have granted approval. A copy of the plans will be sent to the Corps of Engineers, but a permit is not necessary. He said that staff recommends approval of the application. Louis Oberhauser commented on the 10:1 sloping on the shoreline. He would like to work with the City Engineer on that because it is too shallow. Hawn asked if that is a city requirement. Weinberger stated it was a recommendation made by the City Engineer. He said the Watershed District has reviewed the plan and they would be comfortable in working with something less than 10:1. He said he has not shown Tom Kellogg a plan that would reflect a smaller area. The plan will go to Tom Kellogg prior to the application going to the City Council to see if he has any issues with a smaller than a 10:1 ratio. Mabusth asked to see how much of the designated wetland would be altered. Weinberger displayed a map showing the location of the wetland. Mabusth recommended a conservation and flowage easement over the designated wetland. Weinberger agreed and stated the City would request when the application is before the City Council. Hawn asked if they will replant the periphery of the ponds and what material will be used. Oberhauser said they will maintain the fairway in the rough to the edge of the pond along the sbdh fairway, but on the east side of the pond, they will leave a 20’ natural buffer zone planted with trees and aquatic vegetation. McMillan asked if the stockpiles will be planted. Oberhauser said the stockpiles will be rough graded the first year. At the end of the first year, they will finish grade sod. There were no public comments. Page 11 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (»3) 0239$, WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WAYZATA BLVD. W., CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT - ConOnued White moved, McMillan seconded, a motion to approve Application #2398, to amend Resolution #4146, a Resolution Granting a Conditional use Permit Per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03 Subdivisions 19-21, and approve a variance for grading within a City protected wetland on hole #6. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#9) #2460 CUFF OTTEN/KRISTIN JACQUES, 3800 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 8:51 p.m. • 8:56 p.m. Rod Johnson, representing Cliff Often and Kristin Jacques, was present. Kristin Jacques was also present. Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She said the applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to operate a day care center for 45 children in a building that was previously approved for 60 children and 10 day care providers. The previous day care center ceased operation in October 1997 and a new conditional use permit is required. Van Zomeren said the site meets all the requirements under the code for a day care facility. They would be allowed an identification sign not to exceed 12 square feet. The staff recommendation is to limit the number of enrollees to 45 children at one time. The number of staff should correlate based on the licensing. The applicant should provide the hours of operation and the applicant is in the process of obtaining a license from the Department of Human Services. She said it is anticipated that this building will be removed when construction begins on Highway 12. Kristin Jacques stated they want a maximum of 60 children, not 45. The children will range in age from 33 months to age 11 . Hawn asked if the oarking requirements would change with a maximum of 60 children. Van Zcrneren said that if seven or fewer staff are on site at one time, it would meet the requirement. She asked how many staff would be on site at one time. Jacques stated there will be three shifts and six staff present at one time. Van Zomeren said parking would not be a problem. She asked about the ratio of children and staff. Jacques stated the ratio is one to ten and there would be six staff, maximum, per shift. Hawn asked about the ages of the children. Jacques said they would be serving children ages 33 months to 11 years old. The hours of operation would be 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. or 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p m. There would not be any night time hours of operation. There were no public comments. Page 12 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (H9) 02460 CUFF OTTEN/KPISTIN JACQUES, 3800 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Con0nu9d Mabusth moved, White seconded, a motion to approve Appiication #2460 for Ciiff Otten/Kristin Jacques at 3800 Wayzata Bouievard for a conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: 1.The number of enrollees shall be limited to a maximum of €0 persons at one time. The number of staff allowed shall correlate to the number required by DHS for the age and number of enrollees. 2. The applicant shall provide the hours of operation for inclusion in the resolution. 3. The applicant is to obtain a license from DHS. VOTE: Ayes 4. Nays 0. SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS (#10) #2456 BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 1025 BROWN ROAD SOUTH (PID #10-117-23-244)001), 8:56 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. Steve Bohl, Bohland Development, Inc., was present. Van Zomeren presented the staff report. She stated the zoning district for this parcel is RR-1B which requires two acres of dry buildable land for each residence. The lot area is 42.6 acres in total, with 20.5 dry acres and 23.1 wet acres. The site plan shows seven lots. The lots meet the two-acre minimum with the exception of lot 4. The dry acres are 1.8. A NURP pond will be located on lot 4. Access to tot 1 would be provided through King Street. The rest of the lots would be served by a cul- de-sac coming off from Brown Road. Lot 2 would be served by an outlot off from the cul-de-sac. Lot 2 would be considered a through-lot. She said the proposed plan shows a primary and secondary septic site for each proposed lot. The Park Dedication Fee has not been determined since this is a sketch plan. The City would require flowage and conservation easements over the wetlands and drainage and utility easements along the lot lines. The private road for the cul-de-sac would need to be designed and maintained according to City standards. She said the stormwater management issues have gone to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. She requested that the Planning Commission discuss the following issues: 1. Proposed access for Lot 1 via King Street; 2. Lot 2 access and status as through lot; 3. Lot 4 lot area at 1.8 acres; and 4. Tax-forfeited ‘exception* parcel. White asked if the tax forfeited parcel would increase the size of lot 4. Van Zomeren stated it would not increase the dry buildable area because the tax forfeited parcel is wet. Mabusth asked if a wetland delineation had been completed. Van Zomeren said yes. Steve Bohl stated his original proposal was for six lots with a cul-de-sac coming off from Willow Drive. At that time, he did not have a contract to purchase the properly located at 1045 Brown Road and the lots would have all exceeded the minimum 2.0 acre requirement. He said that Dave Zetterslrorn of Henriepitt County looked at the proposed access off from Brown Road. He said Zetterstrom felt that the access onto Brown Road would be a safe and better situation than adding additional traffic to Willow Drive. Zetterstrom also looked at the King Street access for lot 1 which Page 13 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (§10) §2466 BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, HAVINQ AN INTEREST IN 1026 BROWN ROAD SOUTH (PtD §10-117-23-24 ‘0001) - Continued currently serves one property, 775 Brown Road. He said Zetterstrom conrmented that this would be a safe entrance for both properties. Bohl talked about the ponding* Issue on lot 4. Mabusth asked If the NURP pond could be moved further north. Bohl said it could probably move to lot 3. He said the neighbor to the southeast comer of the property has asked about the possibility of Bohl selling a small portion of the property to the neighbor for an extension of their lot. If Bohl did not sell them that portion of the property and moved the lot lines, it would be possible to meet the two-acre minimum for lot 4. White asked about the topography of the site. Bohl said the perimeter of the southerly portion is pasture land. The exception piece on the west and the southeast portion are wooded. The northerly portion of the property Is dense woods except for the vretland. WhHe asked the purpose of the outlet attached to the cul-de-sac. Bohl said the outlet is the driveway access for lot 2. Van Zomeren said she wanted to point out the outlet and find out If that was ceptaWe rather than having lot 2 on the cul-de-sac. She said lot 2 Is a through lot because It couli ^ave access on Willow. Mabusth said the zoning code has a section that deals with the creation of the private driveway outlets having to do with the topography, saving a wooded area, or something physical and unique to the land. Bohl said it would be nearly impossible to grade in a driveway from Willow because of the topography. Mabusth commented that all of the lots could be considered through lots, which means a conditional use permit would be required every time someone put up an accessory structure. Hawn questioned the location of the septic srtes because some of them are close to each other. Bohl stated that on lots 2,3, and 4, the septic sites would be typical drainflelds because the soil for these three lots is sand. The other lots would have typical mound systems. Mabusth stated that the lot area for lot 4 will be a concern Bohl stated he does not need to purchase that property. He said the home on that property Is In need of repair. Using that property for the access would make the access more visually appealing. Bohl said If he doesnl buy that property and someone else buys it In the future, they would need a variance for the lot area. He said there is a gas tank buried on the property, but It can be cleaned up. White said there would be advantages if Bohl took possession of the tax forfeited property. White said taxes would be paid on it and it would be kept clean. Mabusth asked if Bohl would share the driveway on King Street with the property owner to the north. Bohl described the grading plan for the driveway Page 14 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16,1999 (mO) «2456 BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 102B BROWN ROAD SOUTH (PID #fO-f f 7>2J-24-OOOU * Continued Mabusth asked about the City's interest in maintaining King Street as a public road. She asked if the northern property owner and the southern property owner would share it if it was vacated. Van Zomeren said the County would have to research it to see who is the fee owner. Typically, it's 50-50. White asked if Bohl has developed any other areas in Orono. Bohl said this is his first project in Orono. He is involved in developments in Independence and Wayzata. White asked if Bohl has ever been sued for non-performance. Bohl said no. Hawn said H would be difficult to approve a plan that did not meet the minimum lot size requirement. Mabusth said she would like to see the King Street access improved. Gaffron said that topography maps are needed for the King Street area. Robert Wiens. 2170 Sheviin Drive, said he lives on the property located to the north. He would like the developer to comply with the two-acre minimum requirement. He said he is also concerned about further subdivision of lot 1. Bohl questioned the need for a conditional use permit for grading. Van Zomeren replied that n depends on how much land alteration will be done. She said it is based on cubic yards. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS (#11) REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETINGS ON JANUARY 25.1999 AND FEBRUARY 8.1999 None. (#12) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Hawn thanked Mabusth and White for serving as alternate members to the Planning Commission. Mayor Gabriel Jabbour stated he was concerned about attendance of the Planning Commission members. He complimented the Commission members on the way they facilitated the meeting and he encouraged them to send items to the City Council with strong recommendations. He said he would like to see leadership from the Planning Commission on housing for the elderly. (#13) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19,1999 Hawn moved, McMillan seconded, to table the minutes of the January 19,1999 Regular Planning Commission meeting. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Page 15