Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-20-2000 Planning Packet
Public A ttendance Meeting D ate jU ,3. D • ^ Council □Planning Commission □Park Commission □Other Please hll out the information requested BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. if ' n: (if PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME (please print)ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 2.f?^d u\n/^l Mori n.3hor£. iV. 3..D jv ^-01^3 d.Htapg.[MVkX!^^A S.j.■• 7.[iJbttl ^u< /avlw -. /,o,Jc /L. ‘-nji-aqo S.~^feve^ . od, IcM. I .V ? / / O L(i Xili'y Ln\J<n MJ<^. ^^7 ^Cl <r^ OC'Urr.\{7ccj, tv'.\ Q:: 9./Co^' K 20)4 ,Vtvr^?£>.t .10.S^Ci /^.yn .n^'^ 11.l t^i2ty/J^'c.Hty)n n^yt-.fly.Ac w /^1 >o 12.f )/:OvA (^*%JtL2sj£K: N13.._f4U;iy/C 0 14. 15.>k/(iLiit I A /V//c7^ \Jfrwwi0vi%pi Af/'t I A t; /,K I. U.- [}} (T) —m- r/7-;v^£> X:\APfS>’M%PDOCS\FORMS\Pt'lLIC. ATT 7 �:>r .,; � j = �I t=t\ , J-Ji. -�f+L ";1 I� I , r-• � -� - I '\) I *--I l 711.,:��i.Jilpa� ....... ---I I I _J I 6, 1200 7 1 1 I 11 IPA I I I I I I 1600 ._ ,, ·,. i'= u /_. ___ ,_ '-•-. L� Mllt<�.t -•✓✓ ·-•-4,,,,,,,. I 4000 E 2800 F 2400 G 2000 H 1600 I Orono, Minnesota u �'-1-ering Index Map I Di l � J �� K L nal, l!YWP• ....... - � ...... '°'· "•'"°· na1. .. --••-.-. •· "'' .... , ......... ---. ..... , ............. ,,.-,.. ... ... 8 2000 9 MOO 10 2800 11 • .,,,__; gRONOPLA?\�lNGCOSfMls� Nonmbtr 20, 2000 2750 Kelley Parkway-Coacll Cbml AGENDA Condi Repnseatath·t: Mayor Jah�ur AUDIENCE MEMBERS: Please 1lp ID for tbt pablic record at tht front podlam If )'OPlanalaa Commlstlon. Applicaab 1t"ill be uked to move to 1 quatlou wht■ tbt Cbalr aaaouaca the appUeation. n, P u advisory bod)' to tbt City Council If action Is taken on •the>· wm bt schtdaled for the December 11, 2000 City Cou1otherwise aotecl by dae Chair.PUBLIC HEARINGS Review of tbae Items will commence be!on or betwan 1ch• l.#1623 Fred Johnson, 1926 Faacrness Poi.at Road, VB(Staff: Paul Weinberser) 2. 3. 4. #2615 Morpn K. Nelson, 31"5 JamatoW'D Road, Va: (Staff; Paul Weinbcraer' #1633 Jerome Lague, 2138 Sbad�-wood Ro:id, Varimc (Staff: Wendy Bottcnbcr;) #2636 Gary & Susan Cable, 3235 Ivy Pbc.t, Vari&tlc:cs. (Staff. Paul \Veinberie�) 5.#2637 William & Nadine McG-.:.::e, 315 \\·oodhill Roa(Staff: Wendy Bottenbe,�) 6.. #2642 Patrick & Kristen Bun�=--2601 R:iin�· Road,(Staff: \Vendy Bonente=t) 7.#2631 Zoning Code Amendm�:, Orono �IUllldpaJ ZAResidential P.U.D. (St?...l:f: !\like Ga.ff.on) SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:30 p.m. 8.#1634/2635 0 & 0 Holdin& Cnmpany, 1130 & 1140 llot Line Reaaanaemcor IDd Veriaaae. (St 8:00 p.m. 9.#2638 10."2639 11.#1640/2641 Zoning Code Amcadmen� Oroao Mq■ld Section 10.45. (Staff: Paul Weinbcrpr) Zonina Code Am,-admcnt, Orou M� Section 10.52. (Staff: Paul WeiulFtaa) Oroao Amber, LLC, 20'8 Wayzata� P .U .0./Subdivisioa/h-ZooinafCo;NM-M ci. (Staff: Paul Wciabcrpr) PLANNINGCO�BDSSIONCOMMENTS 12 .. Report o(Plaanin1 Commission ,epcceid•ri� "'" dinlOctober 23, 2000 end Nowmber 13, 2000. 13.Odw iaues for cliKussiocl. 14.,._,.,in1 Coanni1rioD epprol'll of rim P - IS.Select:iaaofNJt 1111«triwsbCic,Couari' m-rf 1••0.: r 1k It. 2000. ·ADIOUMMDIT ? t Completion Date: 60 Day Deadline: 11/13/00 101/01 TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner November 13,2000 SUBJECT:#2623 Fred A. Johnson 1926 Fagemess Point Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District:LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 acre) Lot Area: 8,018 s.f. (.18 acre) Application: Applicants have proposed to remove the existing residence and detached garage and construct a new residence on a lot that is located entirely within the 75' lakeshore setback. List of Exhibits: A B C D Application Plat Map Survey Elevation Views Background: Applicants have reduced the size of the proposed house and reduced the size of the garage to a two stall garage. Original application requested a 1,690 s.f. house. After a series of discussions with Staff the applicants were advised to reduce the size of the house to comply with the structural coverage limitations. For lots under 10,000 s.f. the property can have a maximum of 1,500 s.f. of structure. The revised plan has reduced the structural coverage to 1,495 s.f and has eliminated additional hardcover that would have been required for a third stall to the garage. The plan indicates a covered entrance to the front of the building that technically would be considered structure. 36 s.f of additional structure would be added to the 1,495 proposed =1,531 s.f, equaling the amount of structure that has previously existed on the property. Both adjacent properties are also located entirely within the 75' lakeshore setback and have had variances granted to allow replacement of structures in the 1980s. Conditions placed on the adjacent properties were that the amount of structure and hardcover not exceed what had previously existed since no hardcover is permitted within 75' of the lakeshore. 12623 Fred A. Johnson 1926 Ftfemess Point Road Viriances - Public Hearing Pagei Staff would recommend an added condition that the property not be developed beyond the 1,500 s.f. of structure that is permiUed by Municipal Code. The existing structure is 1,531 s.f. REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE Lot Area 21,780 s.f.8,018 s.f.13,762 s.f. Lot Width 100'100' Lake Setback 75'26' deck, 30' house 49’ Front (street) Setback 30'20'10’ Left Side 23'10' Right Side 16'10' Hardcover 2,328 s.f. (29%)2,079 s.r (26%)0% Is allowed Hardships: The applicants have stated in their hardship statement that the existing house is not livable and the existing garage is in poor condition. (See Exhibit A) The existing house and deck are located only a few feet from the lakeshore. Removal of the house and construction of a new house would leave a setback of an average of 30' to the house. Locating the house further from the street would not allow for an adequate setback to the street. 30* is the required setback to the street. The proposed setback is 20'. 20' allows space to back out of the garage into the driveway without backing a vehicle directly into the street, and would provide off street parking for the property. The lake and street setbacks would be consistent with those approved for the two adjacent properties. The hardcover variance is required as the entire lot is located within 75' of the lakeshore. The proposed hardcover would include 1,495 s.f. for the house. Additional hardcover wo'ild be required for the sidewalk connecting the driveway to the front entrance and the front steps. A 164 s.f. deck has been proposed on the lakeside of the new house and would be located 26* i^m the lakeshore. A hardcover summary is located at the top of page 3 of this memo. <2623 Fred A. Johnson 1926 Fifcmcss Point Rood Viriances - Public Hearing Page2 I r-. * Hardcover Existing Proposed House Garage Sidewalk Patio/Deck Steps Driveway Total 1,187 s.f. 344 s.f. 125 s.f. 419 s.f. 43 s.f. 210 s.f. 2328 s.f. 1,495 s.f. (With Attached Garage) 90 s.f. 164 s.f. 36 s.f. 294 s.f. 2,079 s.f. Variance Approvals Requested 1.Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) Structural Coverage - to permit a replacement of the 1,531 s.f. of structure where 1,500 s.f. is allowed by Code. 2.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - to permit structure to be located tvithin 75’ of the lakeshore. 3.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(l)-to permit 2,079 s.f. (26%) hardcover where none is allowed. Additional Information Requested 1)The updated survey does not show the revised footprint for the site plan under review by the Planning Commission. Should the Planning Commission make a recommendation of approval an updated survey shall be provided before review by the City Council. 2)The survey shall also indicate the lowest floor elevation for the new residence to determine the house will be located 3’ above the OHWL (929.4'). No land alteration can occur below the defined flood elevation of 931.5*. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Final site plan not exceed 1,500 s.f. The covered entrance on the street side of the house constitutes 36 s.f. of structure. The overall plan is consistent with the approvals granted for the two adjacent lots (bolh are similar situations being located within 75' of the lakeshore). 12623 FfedAJohiuofl 1926 FtgciiKSS Point Rotd Variances - Public Hearing Page 3 tih AppUcation ** ^ ^ Date RecelveJ]232^^2Z Amount Paid fiO— A CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S250.00 ($50.00 per each ad<J .tional variance) Renewal Variance Pec $150.00 (no change from ori; inal application) Variance for non-confo ming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (D< uble applicaUon fee) Property Identification WuiAber (P.LD.) ________ AtS* lead . to apdic.aoa if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquire I (do) *ilso O' th^djacent parcels of l^d PresenrtoerTO proper^: ^ residential __odier (specify). Z^ung District (month/year) —CO APPUCANT Name Address;:■ Ur)q O pr 01 City:. 0\VN£R (if different tl m applicant) Phone fhome") Phone fwork^ •Zip: ffly/—p Phone nioine'>%. ^ Name Address: Phone (work)^_^.i2|^2£3r|_2_56^4 rity :________Zip: DESCRIPTION OF R CQUEST Describe request in d :taU: __ Estimated Construction Cost S. CQV» '4. S' (attach addidonal sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUI (ED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeriiore Other (specify) HARDSmP/DESCRI TION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue ban ship or practical difficulfy or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoi ins Code reouirements; Cof — (L\t ntJ-tiJTK ^tl na f (attach additional sheets if necessary) ! V b.1 k / 7-in-s3-A3 6 7 £• 'i: .'^.-:' .*» V, ►•* , • * /n / \ *• \ >* % J -.*• •* 'i:' r -,- vVl A* ( »' c A »•c i Shore Line lake MJNN^ONKA -.V®2r 2000) (Apf> V i^e ‘q L »?•.^•.;lL '•• '-.. i^liS^mtSsSmSmSSm <4A^«. yV %!•.••<4LAW^ *%*»C.*w • • •* • ft •• •• Dcsu«»S ^ft*ft/ic««i • • %Zft^l • 4 -*%W CAWlfSCHL Jklft^4^ » •^•1 • Ml< 41*^ -14 m •A^Sft>rr u.*-*®* • I >r ^ *V«IW* i#’;/'/ •» >/* 4.^ J ,#•».; '- t 1 i _UutSru»*«_________________________-"••••________________________j .-iy-«-• • 1i. ( { 1 1 T.4.- 1 • i 1 • 1 ' 1( 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 11 1 t. m.•••• • • .'■ ■'•:3 i ,... •' '/ •••* V *«V •*. •*«#•. ••>•*.*» V •*f .3" y- • • % • ♦*1 / 1 •• • 1 tv i* ^P4,|M f%r «pI(b W«f% *> £t mrnYr ll*Jbtftl f # •» •% i ^«4«I 4*a^«w^v*« y .V .) r*'.*: n #r?^* *• • ^ • % I #' -’"■'‘.>NJ ijj* ki <4MA W^**-«*pCrrP W»Wv- I . -I -■ l4v r. nr«': 3 Application Date: 60 Day Deadline: 9/18/00 1/15/01 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:November 13,2000 SUBJECT:#2625 Karen and Morgan Nelson 3145 Jamestown Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) 79,400 s.f. (1.8 acres) List of Exhibits: A B C D E F Application Survey/Site Plan Plat Map Hardcover Calculation Worksheets Property Owners Notification List Site Topography Application Summary: Applicants propose to construct a pool on the lakeside of the existing residence and adjacent to a gazebo. This home was constructed prior to the 1992 Shoreland Ordinance, which implemented the 150' setback from the Ordinary High Water Level (OH\M.) of Lake Classen. Lake Classen has been classified as a Natural Environment Lake by the DNR. Natural Environment lakes require the 150' setback for structures and septic systems. The proposed setback from the pool to the OHWL of Lake Classen is 123 ’. The existing house is 128' from the OHWL and the gazebo is 123'. The pool is proposed to be 34' X 18' in size. A second variance is required for the average lakeshore setback. The pool will encroach 9’ into the average lakeshore setback defined by the principal structures of the two adjacent properties. This property contains a bluff by definition, but the existing house and proposed pool are set back at least 40 ’ from the top of the bluff (defined as the point where average slope changes from greater than 18% to less than 18%). The required setback to the top of bluff is 30'. »2625 Karen J. and Morgan Nelson 3145 Jamesiown Road Variances Page 1 Adjacent Property: The property to the north would be the most impacted, however would not see the pool due to the existing vegetation and the gazebo located between the houses. A variance was approved in 1997 for the gazebo to be located within the 150' setback to Lake Classen. The Planning Commission made findings that the gazebo will encroach no closer to the Lake than the residential structure, the residential structure was constructed within 150' prior to the adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance and the proposed gazebo location will have little or no impact on views enjoyed by the neighbor to the north. Hardship: Applicant has stated the improvement lies adjacent to the gazebo and adjacent to the deck. Planning Commission should consider the following factors in determining a hardship. 1.The proposed pool would be located between the house and gazebo on the lake side of the residence. The residence was located on the property prior to the 150' setback requirement for Lake Classen. 2.The pool would be located above the hill and would be well above the flood plain or areas affected by the HWL of Lake Classen. 3.Placing the pool behind the principal residence would not function well as it would be located in the front of the house towards the street. Typically, pools would be located behind the house in a back yard. Also, the street yard is the site of the septic system and alternate site, leaving no other reasonable location for the pool. 4.The gazebo and dense vegetation would screen the pool from view to adjacent residences. Staff Recommendation: The pool at the proposed location would appear to have little impact on the neighborhood and would have little or no impact on views by either neighboring property. The proposed hardcover would be within allowed percentages as required by the Zoning Code. Staff recommends approval of the variance. Options for Action: 1.Recommend approval. 2.Recommend denial, stating reasons. 3.Table. 4.Other action. #2625 Karen i. and Morgan Nelson 3145 Jamestown Road Variances Page2 A Application #2625' Date Received ^•-‘ZO^O'Q Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S250.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 Jf (no change from original application) . Variance for non-conforming structures $2^0' After-the-Fact Fees (Double application feej .1 propertv information Site Address Date Property Acquired----------?> —jrr-r I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of lana. Present tB* of propetty; j/residendal -----pother (specify), Zoiung District: _(month/year) APPLICA^. .yV ^^rnone ^^ ^ U—- - Name V . Zip:_iiSLSS:fe Phone _ Phone OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ^ VAif AHrtrg^S!------------------------------- Phone Phone (umrV) <i ^ ----u t> _____Zip:^__________ description of request _Estimated Constmetion S_\ Describe reguest in det^: ---- »r>>to >OK.-----SMtJ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _ Setback: ___Lot Width Front __Side Other (specify) QOoV-sj>J o >^v>-»0 Hardcover _ Rear Lot Coverage c>\ Average Lakeshore hardship /description of UNTJSUAL ^^®^^*^^i^^^^^nditions preventing “Scribe undue hardship or practical diffic^ or unt^l property co nam^ cornpUance with Zoning Code requirements:r\^----- ■' X Sitio^ shews Vn«essatw 6 .L '1'1d cnJo:,311 No NM01fs S'I' \._ -,---�--.....::..:::::::.:,:::._:::,=:���3i��:'.M�NJdo��.:10�JD�a�3l..�,....---,-- , ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' , ___ --. -' 1• I II\ I ---' I I I I I \ I ' ... ' . ' •. " ' " I 1\ I I I I I I N .3 n ) s .,. ) ,· I //, V � a<. '•11;, ... ., '·-::.� ,/ ------�------------- I ------------, - --- ;u . - 00"6tz; o11 •!:I ,tz:.1 t N --. ._, J V N ----------------i---------------------�I • . I. .., (II I I \ I ----------' ' i "----�----.i�'!!��,_l!._IO���!.l. ___ :� -- A, --., --�# ' ''' "t-' ' ' ' �' ' �''"'' ' ff\' ·� ' •·' ..... ' ' ' ·�I I ' 'I • I I I I I I ' ' ' ' I I '' ' ' \ I I I ' ' ' , .... '''° ' ....\ ',:s I I \ I ' 'I I I • I I , I I ' ' ,, I , I ' .' .I I �� ,,,• /'!£ \�-�--""""'�r:r---,.,� ... ',l . .,,,,. �� \ ,\ ''(J • I I ' ' . "· .. I .,tt... .. " I ' ' I I - I 'I 'I ... , ' •••• I ' I I .I .. ' ' ' ' ' I • • c... JSflOH D�lSD(J' • . ---..·�··,·· .............. � ........ ,..,, !..... 7-,::�,-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pl •. I I I I I I I I I I ' I I ,-,,---... ._, --...... , , , , • ; , , , , , ., I I I I, ' -( r 0 C-, /; \ ^3/-^ , • •••# • Ur L^^,l,^tYAcau$' HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 7 -/<?-? 7 250-500*500-1000* ^”^•0 0 *^o aUiJCcSETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250* •fYiyriNC HARnCOVER IN ZONE A.House S.F. L«n|(h Width •t X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. B.Carafe C.Driveway X •S.F. X X S.F. S.F. D.Sidewalk X X S.F. S.F. E.Patio/Deck X X S.F. S.F. F.Landscape Underlain .. By Plastic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. C.Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE -r B S.F. n. I S.F. X 100 «¥7> PROPn<;F.n iiardcover in ynvF. A. House _____________X e S^F. Lcneih Width X X X S.F. S.F. SvF. B.Carafe S.F. C.Driveway X X S.F. S.F. D.Sidewalk S.F. S.F. E.Patio/Deck X X S.F. S.F. F.' Landscape Underlain 'By Plastic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. • • G.Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE +B X 160 « S.F. S.F. % A B •a A B A efi C//- Cl SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) .0-15' HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ^ ^ 500-1000%i7J.2S'.*:250-500* PVKTING HARDCOVER IN ZONT. A. House ____________ /17? 3^ IJoo -f- //re WAULS CflHC, • • B.Garage C.Driveway Lcn|th 2/0 X CD : X Width X X. • • X X D.Sidewalk (f^rcr COi^c,CAZ€€^__________ X- X E.Patlo/peck GA2^eo. X X Oftk a CAZdiv F.landscape _______ *Ui^erUin _______ By Plastic _______ X X X G.Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B X too PBOPnSRn lIARDCnVFR IN 7nNT A.House _____X Length width X X X B.Garage C.Driveway X X D.Sidewalk X X E.” Patic^Deck x ^AefMClfvf F.Landscape AAtyC£*'^f 4 / tdALL Underlain _____________x__________ By Plastic ____________x ~_______ O.Other .X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B X 100 « S.F. /OS S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Z53(9 S.F. S.F. ^20 ••• 4 •• fS S.F. S.F. 760 /7c S.F. S.F. /2S S.F. S.F. S.F. _______%.S.F. .•* 72V3 S.F. 37.\SOi S.F. "2^ Po ^ % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. /SJ2 • •*—S.F. A /7 O S.F. •260- S.F: S.F. S.F. S.F. T2rs SaF. J 7. /So S.F. % A B B TC I-fi-- HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ 75-250* (250-500* 0 {K OlockI ^ 7-/0-97 500-1000* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. Hpute _____________S.F. \HOOO WALLS 1* '■'k- Length 27/ L.r.X X X (9 o.^WWih s.f; S.F. S.F. • • B.parage S.F. C.Driveway X X S.F. S.F. D.Sidevralk X X S.F. S.F. E.FaUo/Deck S.F. S.F. F.Landscape Underlain By plastic X X G.Other X X S.F. S.F. S.F. I c. S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A +B Z/7^S.F, X 100 S.F. % PPOPOSFn HARDCOVER IN ZONT A. House S.F. Length Width X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. B.Garage •' • . C.Driveway •M. .H S.F. X X S.F. S.F. D.Sidewalk S.F. S.F. E. Pacio/Deck S.F. S.F. F.Landscape ' Underlain By Plastic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. O.Other • a S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE _ _f B X too - S.F. S.F. % A B A B I1 i av. RUN DATE RVat/RR ■ATCN 5R5 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATXOH SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. P^SSRRl PACE IS PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SR 2t-IlR'2S SS RRRR RRRSR ADDRESS tJNASSXCNED A L PACE R J H PACE ANOREM L R JULIE H PACE SR5R JAMESTOWN RD LONC LAKE MN S5SSR SS 2R-11R>2S SS RRIO RSRR5 JAMESTOWN RO CRB URSON CARY A LARSON SRR5 JAMESTOWN RO LONC LAKE MN 55354 SS 2R-UR-23 SS RR12 R3155 JAMESTOWN RO IAN C CATEHOUSE IAN C CATEHOUSE 3155 JAMESTOWN RD LONC LAKE MN 55354 PROP A1 OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAME/AODR 3S 2R-11R-2S 33 RR14 RS175 JANESTONN RO NICNAEL CERAROY AWES MICHAEL CERAROY AWES 3175 JAMESTOWN RD LONC LAKE MN 55S54 30 2R‘1I0-2S S3 RR15 RSR5R JAMESTOWN RO A L PACE R J M PACE ANDREW L R JULIE N PACE 3S5S JANESTONN RD LONC LAKE MN 55354 30 20>110*23 S3 0014 03135 JANESTONN RD H N LURTON R S E LURTON H WILLIAM LURTON 3135 JAMESTOWN RO LONC LAKE MN 55354 'i ■A PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO 20-110>23 S3 0017 0S1A5 JANESTONN RO KAREN tLXZABETN NELSON KAREN ELIZABETH NELSON 3145 JANESTONN RD LONC LAKE MN 55354 30 20-110-23 44 0001 03225 SIXTH AVE N N C NEUPEL SDR HEUPEL NEIL C S DENISE R NEUPEL 3225 SIXTH AVE N LONC LAKE MN 55354 H TOTAL BATCH 505 00000 -t OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF OF MY KNOWLEDGE ANP BELIEF. DATE BPEm TAXATION, TO THE BEST 9 \ h • Application Date: 60 Day Deadline: 9/18/00 1/15/01 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:November 13,2000 SUBJECT:H2625 Karen J. and Morgan Nelson 3 14S Jamestown Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR'IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) 79,400 s.f. (1.8 acres) List of Exhibits: A B C D E F Application Survey/Site Plan Plat Map Hardcover Calculation Worksheets Propert\" Owners Notification List Site Topography Application Summary*: Applicants propose to construct a pool on the lakeside of the existing residence and adjacent to a gazebo. This home was constructed prior to the 1992 Shoreland Ordinance, which implemented the 1 SO' setback from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of Lake Classen. Lake Classen has been classified as a Natural Environment Lake by the DNR. Natural Environment lakes require the 150' setback for structures and septic systems. The proposed setback from the pool to the OHWL of Lake Classen is 123'. The existing house is 128' from the OHWL and the gazebo is 123'. The pool is proposed to be 34' X 18' in size. A second variance is required for the average lakeshore setback. The pool will encroach 9' into the average lakeshore setback defined by the principal structures of the two adjacent properties. This property contains a bluffby definition, but the existing house and proposed pool are set back at least 40' from the top of the bluff (defined as the point where aveiage slope changes from greater than 18% to less than 18%). The required setback to the top of bluff is 30'. #2625 Karen i. and Morgan Nelson 3145 Jamestown Road Variances Page I 1 Adjacent Property: The property to the north would be the most impacted, however would not see the pool due to the existing vegetation and the gazebo located between the houses. A variance was approved in 1997 for the gazebo to be located within the 150 ’ setback to Lake Classen. The Planning Commission made findings that the gazebo will encroach no closer to the Lake than the residential structure, the residential structure was constructed within ISO' prior to the adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance and the proposed gazebo location will have little or no impact on views enjoyed by the neighbor to the north. Hardship: Applicant has stated the improvement lies adjacent to the gazebo and adjacent to the deck. Planning Commission should consider the following factors in determining a hardship. 1.The proposed pool would be located between the house and gazebo on the lake side of the residence. The residence was located on the property prior to the 150' setback requirement for Lake Classen. 2.The pool would be located above the hill and would be well above the flood plain or areas affected by the HWL of Lake Classen. 3.Placing the pool behind the principal residence would not function well as it would be located in the front of the house towards the street. Typically, pools would be located behind the house in a back yard. Also, the street yard is the site of the septic system and alternate site, leaving no other reasonable location for the pool. 4.The gazebo and dense vegetation would screen the pool from view to adjacent residences. Staff Recommendation: The pool at the proposed location would appear to have little impact on the neighborhood and would have little or no impact on views by either neighboring property. The proposed hardcover would be within allowed percentages as required by the Zoning Code. Staff recommends approval of the variance. Options for Action: 1.Recommend approval. 2.Recommend denial, stating reasons. 3.Table. 4.Other action. 12625 Kiitfi I. and Morgan Nelson 3145 Jamestown Road Varinces Page: .i A Application # .1 « ^ - Date Received ^'-'ZO'‘00 Amount Paid ^ ^ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S230.00 •• (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SISO.OO 9 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $2fy^0' f - After-the-Fact Fees (Double application feej ^ PROPERTY INFORMATION,^ Site V K #^VJ Date Property Acquired----------2>Jp3=*_—----------------------- I Wo) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of lana. Proent use of property: J:i5esideatial -----pother (specify) Zoiung District: applicant Phone __ PWf> (work ) G \7, Name VAHfirgss!Ko. '-^lty-_ViSinLSa OWTsTR (if different than applicant) Name ^ VAt?—- Address:______________ Phone (hnma)0\S3-.~ MH Phone <>, V *1 -----^ \r^ 0 _______ Zip:_________ description of REQXIEST Estimaled Construction Describe request in detul: ----, T ., (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area _ Setback: ___Lot Width Front __Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Other (specify) Q<?o%^\k/o o\ Average Lakeshore \, -\---\':--.L-Y-ld.:..:�.:::O:.:J::.=�No::..:N:�:OHs:.:s�:=HJ�:.t�yA\:.'.N.�Jd()�·�.:l0�3!JoJ�i_�,------"lr- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' I I N .1 l s V J J ·',• V N I V H o· ''·· / ,·· --�----, , ___ --I• I ,-'' ,, I ---' I ' '' I I • ' I : I I\ I I\ '··•,.,' ----------------------,, ....,UI I t - ------ I oo·s•z Al .s, . •z.u, N •····, ----------------1---------------------�/ � \ I I ' ' I '• I I I I _ .... _.,. -------' ' \ I \ I 't-1 I ----�----1'����,-�����L ___ :� -- � -----�� �� ' ' � ', ',"' I I �.. •,� ' ' . I I ', ·.� \ I I I ' . ' . ' . ' ' ' ' ' . ' ' ' ' ' . ' ' I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,. I I ' ' I I ' . ' . ' . I • I ' ,, .' ' ,,' ., •' ,,,• /� \����--... ,'; � .. ' I . .,,,... , \ ' I ' ' • • • I I I ' I ' ' ' ' ' '' , .,.• ' '' ' ''• • •' .. , tt ..... -...DtflSD(J p� t I f ' I • I I •' I I I I I ' • '· � , ... ,• • 'I J.u.r • L.... 0 C _J •• I I I I I I I I • I • P1 r W t4i V iJr r. .f - •: > "O 7^' f. ft'" A ^ - " h>^ •. ft wy Jta 0 j j *\ •• • • HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 7 ? 7 • SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) f LISTING HARDCOVER IN ZO^iE A.House 75-2S0’ X 250-500*500-1000’ X/C •••^ S.F. Lcn|ih witfus X S.F. X =S.F. •X S.F. • B.Garase X 1 S.F. • C.Driveway X S.F. X •S.F. D.Sidewalk X S.F. X *S S.F. E.Patio/Deck X •S.F. •X S.F. F.Landscaoe X *S.F. Underlain X «S.F. .. By Plastic X >•S-.F. • G.Other X S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE •0 «M ••••* S.F. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •n/3^r S.F. A +B X 100 *=% PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A.House X • 0 • S.F. Length w;^:h X 8 S.F. X m S.F. •X B S.F. B.Caraae X *. S.F. C.Driveway X S.F. •X B S.F. D.Sidewalk X S.F. •*•X B S.F. E.Pacio/Deck X • S.F. X •S.F. • F.' Landscaoe X • • • ^^ S.F. Underlain X S.F. *By Plastic X m S.F. G.* Other X S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE <!• B X 100 » S.F. S.F. % A B A B I j .1 i i C/C SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) .0-75* y HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEEl 9 7 500-1000% i. RXISTT.no HARDCOVER IN T.ON'F A. House _____________ ^99 2S0-5O0* //rS"• .* WALLS COMCf SftASH- Hiooi^ 0 . B.Carafe C.Driveway Lcn|ih 2/0 L.f.X X X a>Widlh X X D. Sidewalk Q^rcr c^/>c. ^^CAZ€eo ____X X E.Pa:io/Deck CAZ^eo. X X CfOc rfy CAlQ^'j F.I Asdscape _______ Underlain _______ By PlasUc _______ X X X G.Other $TOw(55 TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ________-t- B X 100 •PROPOSF.n HARDCOVFR IN yONT House Length Width X X X B.Garage C.Driveway X X D.Sidewalk X X £.•• Patio/Deck /*o:,t x 4^retrjj>j]C F.Landscape i>An/CC*rAf *A UaAlL Underlain x By Plastic O.Other X .X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE _____________ + B X 100 « S.F. /05 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Z530 •S.F. S.F. {20 ».» **4 /S S.F. S.F. 7dTd7 47-y S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. __36 S.F. • •^ S.F. 37.\SOi S.F. % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. r^S32 I •• S.F. A/7 0 S.F. '‘2 00 - S.F; ^ S.F. _____S.F. S.F. ^225 S,F. 3 7. fSo S.F. 2y.^y % A B A** 1 I /i\OlclJiA# ) I Ji: HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET Ahtlj . P IN oufcicl , SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’75-250*ZSQ-5Q0* 7-/0-97 500-1000* PVII^TINC HARDCOVER IN ZONE A.House ____________S.E V/tf»0 WALLS |P Lcn|(h 27/ \.s.X Q o.'^ X ____ X width /S6 s.f; S.F. S.F. $ • B.Qarage S.F. C.Driveway X X 2:^90 S.F. S.F. D.Sidewalk X X S.F. S.F. E.FaUo^ck 7.S.F. S.F. F.Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G.Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A -i- B _ 2*/ 7 d*SvFi X ICO S.F. 72 % pROpnorn hardcover in ynsTi A.House _____________X S.F. Length Width X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. B.Garage •• • C.Driveway **« 4 . *S S.F. X X S.F. S.F. D.Sidewalk X X S.F. S.F. E.Pacio/Oeck X X S.F. S.F. F.Landscape Uoderiain By Plastic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G.Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE B X 100 » S.F. S.F. « A B A B a~p~MiiiiiiA wayiaiiM I RUN DATE ff/Ei/ii NCNNEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORNATXON SYSTEN PROPERTY ONHERS LIST REPORT HO. PXAXMil PAGE 13 BATCH SR5 PROP ADOR OMNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR PROP ADDR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR OMNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 3S 2B-11S-23 53 Riff •§•38 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED A L PAGE t J N PAGE ANDREM L 8 JULIE N PAGE SR5R JANESTOMN RD LONG LAKE NN 553SS SB 28*UB-2S S3 ••!• •SOBS JANESTOMN RD G B B LARSON GARY A LARSON 3RB5 JANESTOMN RD LONG LAKE NN S535B 3S 2B-11B-23 33 ••12 •31S5 JANESTOMN RD XAN C GATEHOUSE XAN C GATEHOUSE 3155 JANESTOMN RD LONG LAKE NN 55355 SB 2B-11B-2S S3 BBIA •3175 JANESTOMN RD NXCHAEL GERARDY AMES NXCHAEL GERARDY AMES 3175 JANESTOMN RD LONG LAKE NN 55355 SB 2B-11B-23 33 BRIS •3B5B JANESTOMN RD A L PAGE B J N PAGE ANDREM L B JULXE N PAGE SB5B JANESTOMN RD LONG LAKE NN 55355 SB 2B-11B-23 33 OBIB •3135 JANESTOMN RD H M LURTON BSE LURTON H MXLLXAN LURTON 3135 JANESTOMN RD LONG LAKE NN 55355 SB 2B-11B-23 S3 BOIT •3155 JANESTOMN RD KAREN Elizabeth nelson KAREN ELIZABETH NELSON 3145 JANESTOMN RD LONG LAKE NN 55355 SB 2f-llB-23 44 •••! •3225 SIXTH AVE N N C HEUPEL B D R HEUPEL NEXL C B DENXSE R HEUPEL 3225 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAKE NN 55355 TOTAL BATCH 5B5 ••••• I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORNATXON AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON TNE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATlONf TO THE BEST OF NY KNOMLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE PROPEm TAXATlONf y 'So. tim ^ • 027 6X X 026 •I I 0 2 • 8 X 3 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:November 20,2000 SUBJECT:#2633 Jerome Lague 2138 Shadywood Road Variance — Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IC 26,632 s.f. One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 acre) (.61 acre) List of Exhibits A Analysis Worksheet Application Site Plan/ Survey Deck/Ramp Plan Hardcover Calculations and Map Topographic Map Plat Map Location Map Photo of Property Property Owner ’s List Permit Record B C D E F G H I J K Pertinent Code Section: 1.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(LX2): Hardcover in 75-250 ’: Within 75-250'of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. Variance Request: To permit 6,784 s.f. (40.9%) hardcover where 6,700 s.f. (40.5%) exists and 4,137.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed. 2.Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (CX6): Average Lakeshore: The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. To permit a variance to encroach 8' into the average lakeshore setback. Application Summary: The applicant is seeking a variance to replace a lakeside second story deck. The new deck is proposed to be 14' x 36' (504 s.f) and located approximately 86' from Lake Minnetonka. On the west end of the proposed deck will be a ramp for accessing the yard. The ramp is approximately 3 '/a X 24' (84 s.f). The old deck was rotting and has been removed. The deck/ramp will encroach 8' into the average lakeshore setback. The residence was built in 1975 in its present location. The adjacent residence to the north has been tom down and being built further back on its lot to meet average lakeshore setback, making the deck protrude further into the average lakeshore setback than previously. (Exhibits C and F). 1.The lakeside patio of approximately 500 s.f. will NOT increase the hardcover coverage in the 75- 250' zone because it is on top of the brick patio which is already counted as hardcover. U2633. Jgrome Lague 2138 Shadywood Road Variance H/20.'2000 Page I i 2.The ramp on the west end of the proposed deck will increase the hardcover coverage in the 75-250' zone. It will increase it by approximately 84 s.f. (0.4%) increase). Statement of Hardship; The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Tiiituea for Consideration; 1 .A deck has existed for many years in the location of the proposed new deck. 2.The house and deck were constructed prior to the adoption of the zoning ordinance. There have not been any additions or changes to the residence since it was built in 1975. 3.A deck would continue to provide a landing for two sliding glass doors located at the lakeside of the house. 4.Are any neighbors* views of the lake negatively impacted by construction of the deck and ramp? 5.A large portion of the driveway is located in the 75-250’ zone. It is a shared driveway with the adjacent property to the south and wider/larger than a non-shared driveway. 6.There are areas of landscape fabric under rock and wood chips in the 75-250' zone. These numbers have NOT been included in the analysis sheet worksheet (Exhibit A). The homeowner has agreed to remove the plastic as indicated on the survey. (Exhibit C). However, there is an area on the lakeside of the residence where approximately 400 s.f. of landscape fabric still remains that should be removed. If it is not removed, the 75-250' final proposed hardcover actually will be 7,184 s.f (43.4%). 7.Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval ul >. variance to build the deck and ramp. U2633 Jerome Lague 2138 Shadywood Road Variance 11/20/2000 Page 2 A UL f) ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area ; LR-IC Lot Area Required 21,780 s.f. (.5 acre) Actual 26,632 s.f. (.61 acre) Hardcover Calculations ; Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed ' hardcover Existing hardcover Proposed hardcover 0-75'6,681 s.f.Os.f. (0%) 7 s.f. (0.1%) 7 s.f. (0.1%) No Change 75-250'16,550 s.f.4,137.5 (25%) 6,700 s.f. (40.48%) 6,784 s.f. (40.9%) 250-500’3,401 s.f.1,020.3 s.f. (30%)o001302 s.f. (8.8%) No Change These numbers do NOT include landscape fabric under rock currently on the property. There is 3,384 s.f. of landscape fabric as indicated on the survey and hardcover calculation sheet. The applicant has agreed to remove 2,984 s.f. of landscape fabric. Structural Coverage : Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 26,632 s.f Allowed: 3,994.8 s.f. (15%) Existing: 3,028 s.f( 11.37%)w/out deck/ramp Proposed: 3,616 s.f. (13.57%) B Application #2fc2.5 Date Received /O Amount Paid SZS(i CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ___________J27 3^ Su Property Identification Number fP.I.D.> /7-//7-Va GG.L3> Attach legal description to appli^tion if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired______/ 9 7 y-_(month/year) I (do) Cdo not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present usT^ property: ^Cresidentl^ ___pother (specify) Zoning District: C \C___________________________ APPLICANT ^ Name ___- Phone (home) Phone (work)_ AddTc&si3./^s;'S^A'r)WiOrrI? ^City: OWTiER (if different than applicant) . Name J __ Address:_____ryi ^_________________ City: Phone (home)___ Phone (work) Zip: 5~.S~3? Zip:. Estimated Construction Cost $<obOO r* T DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ^----------------------^ --------- Describe request in detail:/ I^j i (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width K 7S-2S0 Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or lu^ual property coupons pre^ntiQg compliance with Zoning Code reqi^ments: <i nrM/ - — / / .V . t /,R.(attach additional sheets if necessary)^^ ^ J REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. S. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy SiV x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/s" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy g'/s" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your y ^riance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or reqiajirtt^ t ■ the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and'or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and cenifies that the information supplied is true and correcpto^the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date / -- /3 0^^'^ER ’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes ^f-investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signatur:Date o Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Plaiming Commission Meeting. Plaiming Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to ad\ise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. c CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JEROME LAGUE. IN LOTS 22 & 23. WILEY’ S PARK, LAKE MINNETONKA HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA LCCAL PgSOyTOl or 1 l«t 33. M iKot port •( tol 33. ttocfc I. **Wlty* t I#* Nxt^«Ml«H|p •! « Inc NflPiMUrty «rpm 4 ^ IH« SuttlwMlyly kM o* to^ ki U2S fMi •# lh« isvCncrlir coritt' c* Mitf lot • point tfttorl I3.S fool NorlfiMOOlon# of in# IouIUtmIo^ «no of t»P lot mo«m#o4 o kno from • pokM on ooip Sootnoootorfy ino •ttoni 27VS foot koMfiootiort^ of foW lowlhorty comor to • poM on l*io Nortn«tti«rfy kn« of ioI ^!om 371.8 foot Nortfioootortp of ino «nott Wttlorly co^no^ of fO»tf lol. o <So«^Ul 0«n fnoriorfAv^l Bo yrfvp thewn or« b—oO wpon on T»oi inlonpt to OlS}* IflO bo«^idor*iot of iro o»o«o 400CfiN8 pfOport/. IM locot>on of on ttiolinQ hooM ond #104 ond If^ locoiion of 81 oioijtt *Hordco«or* mm OCA. II doo» not pupovl to tno« ony oUi«r #npro«omontt or oncroocnrronit anmoo CO mar OOPFIH ft CROKBERC. IHC mfmma M80. loc i«r. mMA MJM • OAf wpmo o« Id •of 140 A OA« imr Moroai •OTOiOl >€ U4I O tC 0*0 • or OiOCt Okft yo« »M-ss ^iLT/f IC^ |••38 ■-'J I JEROME LAGUE. 22 & 23. WILEY' S PARK. LAKE MINNETONKA HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA ■ IV SETBACK UC #' e>:\ ^ V SURVEY X 5* UNE ■ V / V . •»*» %M m EXISTING ) \ HOUS^/ • • •" .• V V. - 290* SETBACK UC / . .’./• •l . BtAoaop > ..S’ V.; ;(MVCWAr , -•• /V»> # • ^%4 \. \ r m' *\ *» St B v» •4 -V ^•* \V / Vi .*• .-MA f ?. ^ *7P^K:f-0-:y. *V'’.'**.‘ * •V ^ /..-V i- • X: ••..•. y u_s5Sr\ kBPCtMCf^* ■LEGAL PCSCRPTIQN Of PRfUSPS : Lot 23. ond thot port of Lot 22. Bocli I. *waty ‘ t Pa^L “. Lo^« Mk»«to**o «y^ N.xt h«esl«r:y of o int drown North«ost«fty from o poW»t or th« Southwesterly Uoe of so«d Ic-t dSstont 14.25 feel Northwesterty of the most Ssutnerly corner cf so»d lot thro«>gh o point dittorl 13.5 feet Northwesterly of the Soulheosterty line of soid lot nrteostwed iSonq o line drown from o point on idd Sowlheostcrty Ene disloni 2T3.5 feet Northeosterly of soid Southerly corner to o point on the Northwesterly trv* of soid lot distoni 271.8 feel Norlhcosterly of the most Westerly corner of so«d fv •Vi;. PROPOSED DECK REPLACEMENT JEROME J. UGUE RESIDENCE 2138 SHADYWOOD RD. rt . t ' Ml rr* i 40 X 60 main house footprint -4i 1 J existing sliding glass doors concrete footing 12* diax48" a --- .nitJ- SETBACK ZONE: (CUtCLE ONE) EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A.House <5izE) Lcng;th X X X B.Oarage • •. /•*C.Driveway X X D.Sidewalk X X hr • E Patio/Deck ••• X X -;?»•: V • •• '• *• 4 fel •■TV r L... F.Landscape Underlain ByPlasuc Or Fabric X X X 0.Other16 L.f. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZON‘ TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A + B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE' A.House X Length X X X B.Garage 'C. Driveway X X D.Sidewalk X X E.Patio/Deck X X F.Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0.Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZON" TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A - B Z.A Cci € 75-250 ’•250.S0U ’2S0-SUU'500-1000' £ Width S''w/iOlE z xIOO - u^\ 0.1 Width X too S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.- * S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. • S.F. S.F - * S.F. S.F.=tfe S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. % B 12 oIjlI ■.t-l f • f j;. t. SETBACK ZONE: (CLKCLE ONE) EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZQNF A.House Length ___ll>6 U-75’ •«.■ B.Oarage C.Driveway /h I •itA>‘0 ‘* D.Sidewalk E.Patio/Deck F.Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric O.Other . • >••> X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 973S + B » PROPOSED HARDCOVER TN ZONE' A. House _________X Length X X X B.Oarage C.Driveway D.Sidewalk E.PaUo/Deck F.Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric 0.Other X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A_ _ _ _ _ _+ B 75-251):soo-iooo' tO-tO'c 2<?33 Width d.2 <95* B 2530 547 3S«? 6 -10D Zf^sso xlOO 1^550 5*9./P s.F. -5H£Q S.F. S.F. - coNceftj S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.- S.F.- * S.F.-WCOd OH S.F.-VA»OC/*»/V'’ S.I^-tAwe S.F.-WWLL$ S.F.A S.F.B % Width •'-P J ;3* s.F. if !/ s.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. V 'C- C S.F.. . S.P.-' M.: S.F. S.F. X 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. A S.F. B % m •^ \ ■•; »■ •• «••• • SETBACK ZONE: (CUICLE ONE) EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A.House 0-75 ’ Length X X X B.Garage C.Driveway D.Sidewalk X X E.Patio/Deck X •• *•X F.Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0.Odier TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A + B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE ‘ A House X Length X X X B.Garage C.Driveway X X D.Sidewalk X X E.Patio/Deck X F.Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X 0.Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ____ ▼ B • 75-25U ’250-50 o5 ^?Jo-1000''OO S.F. Width S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.- S.F. CN PtAtT»d. S.F. S.F. S.F. 9^/ xlOO S.F. A S.F. B % Width GS.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.<0 G S.F. S.F. •'3; S.F.-' S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. X100 - S.F. S.F. % B 13 s % ,y i\^ > n -ii> 93- '’ A>' *Lv i'i %4'rii •;/i */ % ’# G- --- ORONO 3 'i: iina ST scHjis^<aai Sr> '-A ^ Uk 0>unc lj^^i >A|T t&'tfort li (T)*--''i AV-'ACUaoL Likt^ '-W auif VATUTA VtAACll ¥ « vAniiTovi - lOMMIT % ■in ^ — r?X*^Jr\oMi w. rr#Sf ^ Skettb^Pdiu tS '- *. • 3i ' •»«' ORONO •IN AVt m aoo oSn^s. sutAii- •LVO «MBN ? r li ■•Otmmoim Nvau liM .••••••• nni I iflumv CR s AARtaOl VAf ORON SS!?«S•00 Y i’ . -:\.V-\ \ i ••’-*•••• •>■ Bov /rv'ArmVi;fe-\\V^ ••• - m 1 '•'•••fa. -■V- ■ . •* 4 /lomS'c f • ^ *. 4 • •••. •. ti ^ roMf •-v . •• V* ’ / t ..;i. ;* _ j«*' .ORONO 1600 f|.. i v-'f' '-f ‘ f mim.m Uz >-:t -I.-V-xi'j*-'-'■!.'' ; __.^M • m m JL‘r-‘ ' “.’’".I’* :9 ^ -' ■ l&0 ■•V'-i • - ■*-i \<-; ■ ^;.V’ "•V V . V*7 \ L •/> V ■>;>'::jS lie-U, uJ. .:fi,v.KSv*-»-’ (■''■: <■ .cl 1 . t . •.': .r I »'• -frJ P *7 ’• ; •» —• n i-n RUN BATE lR/lfc/90 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATI'^ SV^jEM PROPE^iTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIRS5<i01 PAGE 10 BATCH 50A PROP AIIUN OWNER NANG TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO 17-117-2S 31 0040 OSbOi TOOO HI) J G WELLS A K H WELLS JANES E I KAREN H WELLS SAOO TOCO RD WAYZATA NN 55391 30 17-117-23 42 0010 •2172 SIIAIIVWOOO HD T1HU1IIV T WELCH TINOTHY T WELCH 2172 SHAOYWOOO RD WAYZATA NN 55391 30 17-117-23 42 0011 0211.6 SIIADYWOOD RD D A U L UDELL SCOTT D A DEAN L UDELL 2166 SIIADYWOOD RO WAYZATA NN 55391 PROP AOOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR 30 17-117-23 42 0012 02142 SHAOYWOOO RO P C A N A NERLO PAUL C A NARCIA A NERLO U42 SHAOYWOOO RO WAYZATA NN 55391 30 17-117-23 42 0013 02130 SHAOYWOOO RO JERONE J LACUE A WIFE JERONE J LACUE 2130 SHADY WOOO RD WAYZATA NN 55391 SO 17-117-23 42 L016 02110 SHADYWOOD RO KEVIN S HADEJA KEVIN S HADEJA 2110 SIIADYWOOD RD WAYZATA NN 55391 i PROP AOOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 30 17-117-23 42 0020 •2139 SHAOYWOOO RO J P REILY IPS CRAFT JACK REILY I PANELA CRAFT 0917 WOOO CLIFF RO BLOONINCTOri NN 55430 30 17-117-23 HZ 0021 03601 TOCO RO THONAS L SNYDER THONAS L SNYDER 3601 TOCO RD ORONO NN 55391 30 17-117-23 92 tOZZ •2171 SIIADYWOOD RD JACQUELYN A ROBERTSON JACQUELYN A ROBERTSON 2171 SHADYWOOD RO WAYZATA NN 55391 PROP AOOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR TOTAL BATCH 504 •0999 X tERTlFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFOHHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDOE AND BELIEF. ^^ /] f)] DATE #9 Vi3 <r%* y Cl J <5 ^Jiad^cAj(yt.c/ L. Permit No. PERMIT RECORD Date Type of Permit « i Application Date: 10/17/00 60 Day Deadline:imj/OO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner November 13,2000 #2636 Gaiy and Susan Cable 3532 Ivy Place Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: Application: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1/2 acre) Kr:.^ • 1)Request for a variance to permit an accessory building to remain on a property following removal of the principal structure. 2)Variances to permit future structural maintenance to a non-conforming structure and to permit 3,346 s.f. of hardcover on the property where 3,296 s.f. is allowed. Pertinent Code Sections: 1.Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 limits the location of structures and hardcover within 75' of the lakeshore. 2.Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 limits the haidcover allowed on a property. 3.Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 limits accessory buildings to being constructed on lots only after construction of the principal building. The City of Orono has required accessory buildings to be removed when principal buildings are removed. (A permit was issued by the City of Orono to demo the principal dwelling on the property on 9/7/00 -- The building has since been removed for construction of a new residence) Building Permit: The application received on 10/24/00 requested variances to allow hardcover in excess of 25% for the new house and driveway. Revised plans were received from the contractor on 11/13/00 that have reduced the hardcover in the 75*250' setback to under 25% (3,250 s.f.). The contractor has requested a building permit tor construction of the house not requiring any variances. As noted in the following paragraphs, the methods for reducing the hardcover leave questions regarding the viability of the proposal, since needed sidewalks are eliminated and driveway apron reduced to a questionable layout 12636 Gary and Susan Cable 3532 Ivy Place Variances • Public Hearing Page 1 List of Exhibits: A B C D E F G H Application/Hardship Statement Plat Map Permit Record Photo of Ice House Survey and Enlargement of Driveway/Garage Layout Elevation Views of the Proposed House (for information purposes only) Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Owners Notification List Revised Variance Request: On 9/7/00 the City of Orono issued a demo permit to remove the principal and accessory buildings on the property. The house has since been removed. The property o\vners and have requested a variance to keep the existing 8' X 12' “ice house” located on the property. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 states that no accessory building be located on a property without a principal building. The ice house is located on the lakeside of tlie property approximately 47' from the lakeshore. On lakeshore lots, accessory buildings are not permitted to be located closer to the lakeshore than the principal building on the property, not within 75' of the lakeshore and not within the average lakeshore setback. A N isual inspection of the ice house indicates replacement of the foundation may be required at some time in the near future. If the building is permitted to remain on the property a determination should be made on whether the foundation shall be permitted to be repaired or replaced. Typically, the City of Orono has requited variances to do anything other than replacement of siding or the roof which have been considered cosmetic work that would not extend the life of the structure. Repair to the building would not intensify a non-conformity. Hardcover Review: The total hardcover permitted on the property is 25% of the land area in the 75-250' setback. The City's hardcover policy reduces the amount of hardcover that is permitted in the 75-250' setback by the amount of existing hardcover in the 75' lakeshore setback. A variance is required to allow the ice house to remain on the property and to create minimal functional driveway apron and front sidewalk as noted below. Driveway Apron Layout In order to reduce hardcover in the 75-250' to 25%, applicants have proposed a driveway apron that begins to narrow immediately outside the triple garage doors, requiring much maneuvering to make use of the two outer stalls. At the center of the third stall, the apron ends only 1 O' fi’om the building. This in Staffs opinion is not feasible and will result in this or a future owner soon adding driving surface to make this situation workable. An option is to allow the added hardcover now. The V2636.Gary and Susan Cable 3532 *v> Place Variances * Public Hearing Page 2 i 1i minimum apron would extend at least 8' straight out from the doors before tapering. The additional hardcover extending from.-the edge of the door openings would require at least 100 s.f. added hardcover. Sidewalks In order to reduce hardcover to meet the 25% limit, no front sidewalk is proposed between the front entry and the driveway. Staff feels this is unreasonable given that 1) there are front steps leading to the iawn, and 2) this or a future homeowner may add a sidewalk at a later date, exceeding hardcover limits. Land Area (75-250*) setback 13,182.8 s.f. 2S% of Land Area 3,296 s.f. (Total hardcover allowed on property) Proposed Hardcover 0-75' setback 75-250' setback Tojal Hardcover Allowed *Variance » 96 s.f. 3.250 s.f. 3,346 s.f. (Total hardcover proposed) 3^96 s.f (50 s.f) Additional Hardcover for driveway and sidewalk = 100 s.f. Total hardcover would be (25.4%) Issues for Discussion: 1. 2. 3. 4. Should the structure be permitted, by variance, to remain on the property? The ice house was required to be removed from the propert)' when the principal building was removed. The proposed site plan for new home construction requires greater than the allowed 3,296 s.f Keeping the ice house would require an additional 50 s.f of hardcover. Should the foundation be permitted to be replaced/repaired extending the useful life of the structure? Should the City accept the plan without additional a plan to provide additional hardcover for a larger driveway and sidewalk? Planning Commission Options for Action: A. 1. 2. Accessory Biulding To approve variances to permit the accessory building to remain on the property and determining if the building should be allowed to repair/replace the existing foundation. To deny variances. Accessory buildings are not permitted on properties without the presence of a principal building. The principal building was removed in September, 2000. 3.. Other Action. *2636 Gar>' ind Susan Cable 3332 Ivy Place Variances - Public Hearing Page3 g.Driveway and Sidewalk Issues 1,To approve varices that would permit the applicants to expand the driveway and include a sidewalk. 2.To recommend the plan eliminate hardcover elsewhere on the property to expand the driveway and install a sidewalk. 3.Other Action <12636 Gary and Susan Cable 3332 Ivy Place Variances - Public Hearing Paged •* A Application # 2-(^ S (p Date Received /o/n lot^ Amount Paid A 'XS' 0 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY IN^RMATION^ ^ Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.X Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. t/31 /OO_________________Date Property Acquired I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X residential ___^other (specify) Zoning District:____________________________________ (month/year) APPLICi^T ^_ Name Q ______ Addressra^ C^ ^4Q<^OOa^City: Phone fhome l Phone (wxirk) __ Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Ccmstruction Cost $ M*>SiOOQ«^ Describe request in detail: N€U-> (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: ___Lot Width Front Side is-'^so ^ Hardcover Lot Coverage Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) H.ARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: _ (^ach additional ^eets if .necqssaryX,-.^ *—1 •• j 1rf-t;.-*:.7 e .a J *• ^.Y>, ■-.1 1 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted hv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.•• t • • Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150*, labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348*5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8‘/z" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (I) copy ZVz" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views provide one (1) copy SYi' x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. . Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant e.xpenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true Ad correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signatuie-Date OWNER’S SIGNATURE ^ The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to friis application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. '? rA ^ _________ DateSignature \ I Applicant must have all submittids into the City offices 25 days before the Planningta^ into Commission Meeting. Planning Coiibnission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicaius must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in >our place and to advise the Building (Sr Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. aO-ll7' 33 & %J>-\ot (6)'•X%X <8 XlOT 185 .7, / *<A 3 /' S ^ (52)^ \ 30®® IDN *> j/,,r:?) 7r X.j '-iX O 4 « "1 '-Ar'>k A.Y&. Permit Mo Ig>a1 jTcu ’PXl<?^-c PERMIT RECORD Date t -4^-^/ /Q -;g-6>to L, -t4-13 3-7. oo Type of Permit .hMyh^Myi u/aXjj\ D^tv\ p - PrM« /}<igg&g ory r D '/j •f (' f.. , .. 10.13 'I. IJLA I ---=t:::::_-. . .. . .. -. ' 141 -t 1) Z3,4 : ------,.., .... _...... ..., I I ... ...... · , • 1 i , c r · . n,,.;n.o4 !� ,\\J � A -11 ",1 � g -z c, "' r'b . (, 7 � C, -I� 1''1.7-"k-:. 0 .. -Z "l t 3rf -1,1., .. (!' -)0 1'. 1 J .. �3:. (- - 1. "l)"" � ·", ': & 1-1 :I. I • �) )I ; . ;-=- ,<& ' -, � ,. 7 • I Lili ?. ,1 .t f 381.'2.�/ &12.s� ''f 1.'t '1>. 'l. '13 It(, Lf � --i, th 'i .'1 b 0 {l \ v f WI\-( � .. � )( '-l 9 '-f 3 z... 1.l \o. � c_.3,c,o.s.,c2 :.t,3 (,3 \ S ---,----,,,.,, 2" G,5 I q � + I, J \ . 5 --3 ,_jO C. t.( '2 . 3/i os. � -! I), l� ?-'B-: -i..s,b .,0 lP7l /71 ANO ''"Tlf 'IL1�'J Sad11,·,,;,,;,w t,/1! S'l'�,.�6 PA� L,,f • • \vy //S f. / ] « [ V ^ \ \ %%7-r>) '' X/4® f.^7 ^B,4 \0. V5 / mi9/-<D^>s.r r*:',.? :!5)g.rxlz. d)C)XVS-V**i- ___y r df ^ •• • ••*. • ««• '5^ r'^/o‘ p'. •»>fc • .• .Ti .* *;\4i .‘..r ^ V**A ..> \ * . .’•?'>V‘/ ;• ■■ •';•• i'V^‘•■ ■ ;. ‘ . . I ^V '.1.* \ . • 1 • . *1 • ;«•;S’.T:;.?.•••>• ••. • "K:rr '-'- ■ ,-• • '•••; > •• :;."••^••:;■-••:.••-^=;• ;• .;v^.1/ •. ;..• • . ••• V-v.>.{•/• t; 'i •••■• •• -■■ ’ ‘.'sV'-r ■■ ■ ■:';.' ,•*•/. ...§• n—.:•$. •• • •■■r-.•>.?' •^ - V'* -• Vr. ' y 'f' ‘■'0 * *>. I fi f. > ■• •», . , I -T ' ■ . d •::.W.-vv.. •V-W..\.r..V ••H :r.w/,V\ t.• . I *. :- 7, -4 • -li^.'Vw. '*.v ‘■•'vet'll V"rctM6 V.5 -V y -r - , iSsli ifeliji . • '-JL.’ *1ir^fv MMmill Mi V;. > E5A;.' .■ ■•■;• ■ ■■:'■ S«fisai6 c A)f; 4 ;i /•'’ I ', vViV :'iV'^’■> ■■ : ■',r ’ n • J •• *v -% •»» - • J.*..• :s . ^ ••..-» •■ tv:- •»■••>V••' ..' ;.wiv./.•; - tj.** . '< • A..n../ ^r.,- • . r.. »: • ..*• > Vi ! • ••.•■•• • ^ . • i • •1 ».?•• vv.'.■••;*• •-»*• . • .•.• •• >■ • • • •*. . •; "••• V A •*-••• •* , ; • * • 4 •■% , % f -«• I */** :t--t ^ irtro f* vib AHii m y .4 . W #1 "iAtr’ '■ ;U414 ^ If svKilVj-:>> »• ^ *,i • r — ---------,*.' k I 71' ; ri Siitl i i £85 g 1J I V-*.V % 'A It •f •A.-tyt’ la* Ba m 21-rf. ■£82S62?^i' v^T« 11 V \ M1 . ^ ' s V ‘ it 1!' *- . I • * S s - h .•ij ^ (• S I *^ .> ^ V i s J 1 c \ ^3 ■( i i) V •' .-''^Wi.*<1 tc* 5 I t 4 *bid-I'inr'iit'iiW ti ‘ ; ’ii f V Y . *'i, ^ i ti •s. ^ I " fl ':i \ V •A'\ *-4 «!V •* **^i« •' ' * ' * #1/ 'a / J/«•• •= >./• V .♦. li .w:. .-j V i( 1: ainiSSi I % rtUMMKMBtVrc^!^t£aTt. . t ^ ^ I fMi I ii. m •. v\> . *■ 1. ' » AikOMta «I llli#«a«Hk»« ii y nj I.* iiBm A-7^ V. ’ < V FP^^7 8^4 .* ' # r I ""E Ksr:ii *.• r—I V (n- ^ i ^j-n % •■I«i1•• « •4 * *1 • X 1 ■•♦■►♦ ■ 1 ••'* > S , ' •!*<1 .•1 • 'i'.'5j:-/iv,:-; 'cl.'*’" I ■V *' .‘*Vv'- V' ••■ ..' I r A O >• p"’" r>/'i >■•."^ ^.;>' *■ Wi.p:Wp:-: rtvi- V.'me-' ■- A?:. . mi; M: ■ ' W’-i ifI ' i? ■WA’// l| ^■:r, ‘ v»r.‘ X •v ;> . •• • : :t- ..VV.. ;. r' . .'5*1 a' ». ■. I Av • . r y i. t-‘j' 1 k ^ .' / jr<y *V :^ •J I.v?^ .♦ gt\ 1^ I'Tfrwk Vk 5 SETBACK'(ClU(.l.t. urtLI ■<-/3 7T-Z.S0 Kyi.ynNc; hardcover in zone A. House _____'/^___ L^ngih 7.^ <? /3. 5" X X X witftt/r 3.9 37 B.Gerage C.Driveway '2.0 72..? '20 X X ^7 Z2 D.Sidewalk <7^X X 2.<" E.Patio/Deck JO X X //.3 F.Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G.Other /f TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL P^^TY AREA IN ZONE A B y X 100 PHQPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _____________X Uagih WMdl /A - B.Oarage C.Driveway X X D.Sidewalk X X E.Patio/Deck X X F.Landscape Underlain By Plutlc Or Fabric X X X Q.Other \ TOTAL HARDCOVER I^ZQNE_ TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZC. ,_ ^ A '5Z9-Q 4.B IV9Z-S X100 JUU-iUwW S.F. 3 c S.F. 2^^ S.F. r2. A S.F. S.F. 46^ 3^ S.F. S.F. hO S.F. S.F. 2/6 90 zSE S.F. S.F. #7/ j$y S.F. S.F. S.F. iiz S.F. / (3/97.9,5^rx S.F. S.F. f# _S.F. SK •S.F. a S.F. a ■Z647 __S.F. 4es _S.F. S.F. a _S.F. S.F. a _S.F. S.F. a — S.F. Bi S.F. B S.F. a __S.F. _S.F. 3250 S.F. S.F. -% A B A f RIM DATC •ATCH MR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORNATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PM35401 PACE A PROP AMR OWNER NANC taxpayer NME/AMR 58 28-117-25 42 8816 85544 IVY PL A N JEWETT ETAL ARTHUR N JEWETT 5544 ZVY PL WAYZATA HN 55591 58 28-117-25 42 8819 83554 IVY PL TED I NANCY CAPRA TED CAPRA 1984 ED6EHATER AVE ARDEN HILLS HN 55112 58 28-117-25 42 8822 85514 IVY PL J 8 S WHITE JANES H 8 SHERRY D WHITE 5514 IVY PL WAYZATA HN 55391 PROP AOOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER KANE/AOOR 58 28-117-23 42 8825 83518 ZVY PL STEPHEN D NZLSON STEPHEN ■ NZLSON 5588 ZVY PLACE WAYZATA HN 55591 58 28-117-23 42 8824 83588 ZVY PL STEPHEN i WZLSON STEPHEN • NZLSON 5588 ZVY PLACE WAYZATA NN 55591 38 28-117-23 42 8829 83525 ZVY PL D L CUHNZN6S 8 N H CUNNZN8S DANZEL L 8 NARTHA N CUNNZNCS 3525 ZVY PL WAYZATA NN 55391 8855 NNER NANI TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 38 28-117-23 42 83532 ZVY PL 0 A CARLE ESN CARLE OARV A 8 SUSAN N CARLE 3532 ZVY PL WAYZATA HN 55391 38 28-117-23 42 8834 85545 ZVY PL JEFFREY 8 OERRA OANRERRY JEFFREY 8 DERRA DANRERRY 3545 ZVY PL WAYZATA NN 55391 38 28-117-23 42 8835 83535 ZVY PL R D LZN06REN 8 E A LZNDOREN R D LZNDOREN 8 E A LZNDORBt 3535 ZVY PL WAYZATA NN 55391 PROP AbOt TAXPAYCR NANE/AOOR 38 28-117-23 43 8854 83589 ZVY PL LEXSEL R COX LEZSEL R COX 3589 ZVY PL WAYZATA HN 55391 ■5 TOTAL RATCH 582 88818 I X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRIM REPRESENTATION OF ZNFORMATZON AS XT APPEARS TNZS DATE ON THE RECORDS OP THE MNNCPZN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATZON, TO THE REST OF NY KNOWLCDCC AND RELIEF. y.->r\ .*■ . 5 DATE J r O: FROM: DATE: Chair Hawnjnd Orono Planning Commission Members Ron MoorseTCity Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner November 20,2000 SUBJECT:^2637 William and Nadine McGuire 31S Woodhill Road Variance — Public Hearing Zoning Dbtrict: RR-1B One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) Lot Area:369,369 s.f. (8.48 acres) Ltot of Exhibits A Application Site Plan/ Survey Topographic Map Septic Report Permit Issued for Foundation Plat Map Location Map Photo of Property Property Owner’s List Permit Record B C D E F G H I J Pertinent Code Section: 1.Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (D);Accessory Building Location: No detached garages or other accessory building shall be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal structure on that lot. To permit a 21' 5" x 11' 5" accessory structure closer to the street lot line than the residence. Application Summary: The applicant has requested a variance to permit the construction of an 21' 5"' x 11' 5" (246 s.f.) accessory structure between the principal structure and the front property line. The south lot line is considered the front lot line by Orono code. The accessory structure is proposed to be a tennis court pavilion. The pavilion will be located 135 ’ from the front prof^rty line where the residence is located 2S5’. The proposed location for the accessory structure is adjacent to the existing tennis court. In October, 2000, the Building Official granted a permit to construct the foundation of the pavilion with the understanding the variance application for the accessory structw may not be approved. (Exhibit E). The on-site septic inspector did review this application regarding the septic system. The primary septic system was inspected October, 2000 and found to be compliant. The location of the future drain field site is located west of the tennis court or the opposite side proposed for the pavilion. U2637. William/Nadine McGuire 315 Woodhill Road Variance lim'ZOOO Page I Ji The nearest adjacent neighbor to the tennis courts is down a heavily wooded slope to the south, approximately 250 feet away. (Exhibit C). Structural coverage and hardcover are not an issue with this application. Statement of Hardship; The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration : I.The accessory structure will not impact adjacent properties. 2.Does the Plaiuiing Commission have additional issues or concerns with this proposal? Staff RccommcadatioBt Staff recommends approval of a variance to build a tennis pavilion next to the existing tennis court. WilUam/Nadine McGuire 315 WoodhUl Road Variance n/20/2000 Page 2 'fi Application # <^^37 Date Receive d Amount Paid CD CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ^ _________ Property Identification Number (T.I.D.l AA A A AAA A A AAAAttach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ^ A • j ^9^Date Property Acquired ^ IS'l I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property:residenti^ ___other (specify). Zoning District:I S________________________ .(month/year) .x'**•'•r' fZ\ :■ j *i H ' .) APPLICANT Phone (home l 4^j~4*?2. -OZog Name WiAtb-Son.'T^ iVrgO Phone (work ) 3fe>3 -442-1 Address:. iIvs/V ~3Cc?__________ Citv: f>-r fW>u-_____Zip: Ss Id^ ) OWNER (if different than applicant) .Phone (home) Name Address:^ \ C> V/vJ iSfcjrsv-4-t l.l.> n /2_ Phone (work). Citv: QBfftNjQ Zip: SS39r DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $30 c:>00. —^ I ___ ^ "**" ^ 7V2c;cd.i.^ At£">>T^ ^7^Describe request in detail: 6o<»-c> a T~ErA/M<cg3c.>rLn (attach additional sheets if necessar> ) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage etback: Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe imdue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code reouirements:V\ig nM/>ot-rM_u^ tv> r^> a IVTTftCHEO Trig 0.1^^ Trte. C1kJ<nA>>^ "T^AiOi v. c at ya-r.-ra ..-.CE3»s^M<>gC. -T7»e &\Tao£.mj.'tg ‘ ifet TOO c:.L.Ciis A<3-«uu>^cira Tfa -rvtg fUQue Aoc.C3& Tfi/^ The HdotbS"^(attach additional sheets if necessary) lOBAakJUUCAIiAA REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5^ Certificate of Survey (signed by' a 'Ifcensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8 ‘/i" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/i” x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 814" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and c^pct to die best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature/Date /lO/y^/or) OWNER’S SIGNAtURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Cotiunission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. --- ... f .J • • • \ I I I / I .--.-.-� I I I I I -/ I I \ \ \ I I I ft 1 B VtEw Trom Temmis Court V « * '/ • ,. 0 ��\\\\ ,� �\�\,�l \1 ll' \\\11 1 iI 11, I .. \\� }/,,. --� / � � / - • . _) r 3S" iMhrll R). W I b uxirjT I1 iLiYx iiy r Address: 315 WoodhUlRd.PID: 02-117-23 12 0001 Building Typ main & guest #BRs/GPD: 5 #Systems 1 Units Billed 1 Permit#: 6344,1028 Date of Permit: 8/18/94,6/18/ Installer: SuUivan, Sandd Exc. System Type mound ^ Experimental: no Appliances lndry,dshw,dspl T) SYSTEM CONDITION Conformity: 1 Tank Condition: 6 DF condition: 11 Failure Pot: med SEPTIC TANKS Material: precast concrete Setback to Bldg: 20 Capacity: 1000,1250,1000,1250 Cesspool: no DRAJNFIELD Length of Lilies 75 # Lines: 3 Trench Width:' 10 Treatment Area: 100*38 Type of Filter rock,clean sand Soil Boring: yes Tile Size:'2 Under Tile 9 PercRate: 53.8 Setback DF-Bldg: 25 DF Ht alx)ve Wt: 3 Soil Type: loam, clay loam Limitations: water table WELL DATA Setbacks - Well-Tanks: Pump Type: Well-DF:Report in File •Depth:Diameten Method: INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD DATE DESCRIPTION COMPLIANCE DATE . GALLONS 5/26/95 mound installed, W. system only .2 6/17/97 1500 £. system connected to expanded mound 1 11/22/99 mound sur&cing, repair by 2/22/00 3 4/18/00 DF saturated, pimp tanks 10/17/00 no surfacing, pump tanks 3 1 Vvj CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway - PO Box 66 PERMIT E Crystal Bay, Minnesot: 55323 (612)249-4600 Permit Number: Permit Type: Date Issued: P03062 Accessory Structures 10/18/20 SITE ADDRESS:3IS WoodbillRd WAY2ATA.MNS5391 PID: 02-117-23-13-0006 DESCRIPTION: Proposed Use: Permit Class: Permit Type: Building Accessory Structures Census Code 437 Permit Sub-type(s): Undefined DETAILS: Approved per resolution #: Separate permits required: NOTICES/REMARKS: FEE SUMMARY:Permit Fee: State Surcharge Fee: S 18US in ei ss.oo Valuation: S 10,000.00 'i TOTAL FEE;S 304.03 APPLICANT:UTNDSOR COMPANIES INC 1175 HWY 36 ST. PAUL, MN 55109 OWNER:W W MCGUIRE & N M MCGUIRE 315WOODHILLRD WAYZATAMN 55391 Copies: City, Applicant, Assessor, Finance Page! MtatOillT H t .•2*»7 t i »V 7 i i** *» cV > I a a . » ¥i iV- COUITII ^ »•» 2 ' I CtOOO I4TN AVIS ^:lLyd!ard'j\^ >ltoiaao a w Stve •«}•?»• "T—* V'^X '*1 •• ■»«•«..•; nBB loot Cadlrya,/ MI.I. Ji'r.i BinB_ C .*.v•^.f/CoIfCoo i«2ri* W ^ j ti«mi „fi^ V AVI « AVI ■ ^vi a 1ITR AYt a 800 ’V*'" —s? Hi^un 5| = g ♦f^*S•ctiittt 0 « . - >. >*' -• . .* -T*‘ v.* • r.* / 5mtrA B ly-'v •• -’•/Jh :■■■■■ Ir ■■'4' "■- ffuntiAgw ^oMf Tanagtr ■ri‘a*« '•AiianAi^yy *;• «• SEE MAP 76 •V.• •~v ■ ^ Lookout^} Foint ~r ''HdnaTrot • •••' - i-'<- Brmjf . : . J jpoint' ^ -/ • •“ ;. Point ''.://f:. • y • ^ .» •• •• « jr. Brackett M Point ..*1 *^•• *V • • • • -T*. --i*... ■•. • .• •. ...»' ! V .; • •• '.:.•1 ';•/.':••• ’ .• / ■ ••-i • vV ;: ••.. ^ ;•• :..•. \ ika ::V.-A ■ •.*•.•••••* . • ^;- •V •• •. • • • • ‘ V - • aV*-'. Robinson ■n..-- '■ ' Bay CibuHt ’t vV'' r X ---------T“^—r~^'•* . • ••• « • ^a.^V 4 Bit V /.> Islimd Point Charmln 2800 \ ✓-----------K aaiTii Perguson^s ••\ • • • •*. • V /: MK a 7 WQ'^LAN.B S. »•! S. „ IWD ^ fwiicr Aiiti>OMt*»SS>> f/ lUB fUJ IC 081 AAO AVI Qa M TjTW r7i3sa # * «a~/\):u*-\y- DEEP t '7^ CTi•/»«•« ; iW niQ 2' Buoicr u; \A . rc:\l\, (,J> I • >. < saS; ■ ■:%» :-r^''HA.r?3Fi>'. *o >-V ■ ^' A'’ ■mmmi mmfMm wJ mm t rj'/ t9 ‘ -•' y. »i / • -/* ✓- j *. « ‘ y r « RUN DATE &0/17/t»HENNErXN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LXST REPORT NO. PXASSAtl PACE 7 •ATCH BRS PROP AOOR OWNER NANS TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR PROP AOOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAIff/AODR OWNER NANS TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SO OZ-llT'ZS 12 OOOX •0200 WOODNXLL RO WOObNXU COUNTRY CLUl WOOOHXLL CNTRY CLUB 200 WOOOHXLL RO WAYZATA NN SSSYl’ SO I2-117-2S IS 0000 00515 WOOOHXLL RO W W NC6UXRE ANN NCOUXRE W N NCOUXRE ANN NCOUXRE 515 WOOOHXLL RO WAYZATA NN 55591 50 02-117-25 15 0007 00030 ADDRESS PENOXNO WOOOHXLL COUNTRY CLUB WOOOHXLL COUNTRY CLUB 200 WOOOHXLL RO WAYZATA NN 55591 50 02-117-25 24 OOOO ' 01250 HOOONXLL AVE UNITED HEALTHCARE INS CO UNXTEO HEALTNCARE XNS CO NNOOO-T702 P 0 BOX 1459 NPLS NN 55440 50 02-117-25 24 0009 01200 WOOOHXLL AVE CRH NAXLE CHARLES W A NARLA C NAXLE 1240 .WOOOHXLL AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 SO 02-117-25 24 0010 •0555 WOOOHXLL RO T E NCNELLXS A R J NCNELLXS THOHAS E NCNELLXS 555 WOOOHXLL RO WAYZATA NN 55591 50 02-117-25 51 0047 •0450 ORONO ORCHARO RO REVIN OARNETT KEVIN OARNETT 450 ORONO ORCNARO RO S WAYZATA NN 55591 SO 02-117-25 31 0050 00290 WOOOHXLL RO JOHN C A LOXS A 0*HALLEY JOHN C A LOXS A O'NALLEY 290 WOOOHXLL RO WAYZATA NN 55391 SO 02-117-25 42 0011 •0050 AOORESS UNASSX6NEO CXTY OP ORONO CXTY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 44 CRYSTAL BAY NN 55525 TOTAL BATCH 505 40009 X CERTXFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE ANO TRUE REPRESENTATION OP INFORNATXON AS XT APPEARS THXS OATE ON THE RECOROi OP TNE HENNEPXN COUNTY OEPARTNENT OP PROPERTY TAXATXON, TO UK BEST OF NY KNOWLEOOE ANO BELXEP. OATE*UMaj) u Per19it No. 1391{ o>l,S·S g,� g,f 2,......_._# Cz.; :J 7 9 7,c; ... , ., - C, - /() 0 12 /C,31.S /:., ;JiJ a is .lc.Jc-;J(.,c::1 ,;,cf o K -a .. -, P MIT RECO 'RD Date J/-lO �'J� -,s •�· -2_ CJ 'ID-tq 7 //-�/· 71 ►:3 -to? -PK_ �-3-'7? '� -g -.. - �--If, 7'.f _II-ti- 'I 'l J Type of Permit TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moojse, City Administrator FROM;Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:November 20,2000 SUBJECT:#2643 Patnck and Kirsten Burton 2601 Rainey Road Variance -- Public Hearing Zoning Dbtrict: RR-1 B One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) Lot Area:13.86 acres List of Exhibits A Site Plan/ Survey Trees to Be Subdivision Zoning File #1128, Trees to Be Staff Report Resolution #2239 Flowage and Conservation Easement MCWD Application Plat Map Location Map Property Owner’s List B C D E F G H I Pertinent Code Section: Variance to fill in wetlands for driveway crossing (10.55, Subd.8). Application Summary: The applicants are seeking approval for driveway construction through a wetland. This lot (Lot 3, Block 1) was created in 1988 with the approval of the plat of “Trees To Be”. (Exhibit B). “Trees To Be” created Outlot B as a corridor for future private road access to the lot. (Exhibit D). In 1988, when this subdivision was approved, approval for access over the wetland was not granted. However, at that time it was noted approval would be required w4ien the lot was developed. (Exhibit C). When the subdivision was approved a flowage and conservation easement was t^en over the wetlands, therefore a variance to the terms and conditions of the flowage and conservation easement is required for this proposal, and the zoning variance process is the normal way such approvals are granted. Because the proposal is for less than 500 cubic yards of fill, a land alteration permit can be granted at the staff level when the fill approval is granted. The proposal is to encroach upon the wetland with less than 125 cubic yards of fill to construct the driveway. The wetland is a t> pe 2 wetland and not a city protected wetland. The total wetland area impacted is approximately 1500 square feet. This is actually less fill than would be needed if applicant was going to extend the road for a further subdivision but that is not proposed. U2643 Pairick/Kirsten Burton 2601 Rainey Road Variance 11/20/2000 Page 1 u i*E'' !■ The applicants have submitted an application to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for wetland alteration. The proposal is4entatively scheduled for the MCWD Board of Managers review meeting on November 28,2000. If onsite mitigation is required, it will be minimal and can easily occur on site. Statement of Hardship ; Approval for wetland fill was not granted when the lot was subdivided and platted as part of the ‘Trees to Be” subdivision. The only access to the property is via Outlot B with a driveway at the north end cf the property across the wetland. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1.The driveway at the north end of the property is the only feasible means of access to the proposed building site. 2.Approval of wetland fill to allow for driveway access was not granted with “Trees to Be’ subdivision in 1988, but the City fully expected to grant future approval for this fill. 3.Other issues raised by the Planning Conunission. Staff Recommendation : Staff recommends approval of a variance to the conditions of the Flowage and Conservation Easement to allow the proposed wetland fill for driveway access. This proposal will move fonvard to City Council after Minnehaha Creek Watershed District reviews it. ^2643 Patrick/Kirsten Burton 2601 Rainey Road Variance 11/20/2000 Page 2 , vir.*w.'n iTWMA-- BOUNDARY 5: TOI-O/RAPHY SURVEY OF LOT n.K TJU.Ps V.) !'F. AND OUTLQT 0. TKfirS TO l!K nn* o’^oN *. ni!”‘*'v'’’N 'vi\’nb>-jita ( S I T i LANDSCAPI }} ri PAT AN KIRSTE B U RT O •«r.” «• « V* I •••• rTK^TtfiwcEcnurvruMa^icbff^.---- •* •.J . * .a..!.•«••¥ ___I £r?:;^jZrn^^ *«u« •• -..tnt .VAIME^ R O A r O R O N C MINNBSOT/ 3 5 3 9 J *s --- •% m*tr I •• '? "••J ^ h!*V!*I*!*. I*.' !’."’ /.* •.•• ••••- ’. s"''eemc o^^.nmfSJfc -•M)9ion co^nkol^^\•:•:•:•:f.v:^■/•^ r'Ti^’‘'t' !’’ ‘ JA /.'■' ..- ■•Nr / >:?i: •. V-. m #PROPOSED PRE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION LAND ALTERATIONS I • .T**'....•0>•■^ 0 «f •• * 'I r^'%• 5 TREES TO BE caoocNc f-i I *Si yJ 7^smm KW 1: j j rK^vi^ys: j|| j »I r^‘ «• * '. \ I : «-^>*’1,1 j I m#<w I ^frm^rnm _ % ;»27^y t ti • gtf #«•» sm^rnrm »r 4H£0Be sm «M« mr 4iMr s0t jma //« 4a«# ^ Mssm0tr» srA0t0^ 0^ —1 * •* 1 1 i :t »•«•• • I**! •••»» MMi***« ••*-*!*^ •«4 •«>««•«•• •••M ■I'HI ltaM« ••“ “• ^ shcct ittiiiaj 9^e.SO /TV"/*^'^7' -230.^5“ SO£/i / * 230.4^ N$ /IkS ^ ** <k"5 ^ / j'i;'» cv 5 N^ v;?/ .w/ '■ _ L -^ -?.j - J£^>j fe 1i^ SASr ^7/f4T TAJT AT/'sr AO/fTH Hr '' bi^ *^5^1w ^f ^ soi/rA//Ajr or rA£ s> AorrA 2s^ AODs or lOr 24> -AorrA- — Xm.33- %%\lf2 ‘:^‘~si^” ^.iJ In u > Hf»trv LOT i “> ^ ‘ ®ii' ■“ •\ w .so rrrr or sec.o^ i.t>V .--------I ^ T^ J' !n§ aoa^ •••».. .-----4-/S.A3 SOi/rA-------i^e^, 1. ;': t /W 907.S f»ek of L»l 2^, 0 s ey . AuMlors Suk0ffv0t0t* A^. 379 N \'^■i'5^i*r N \" 9i TO: FROM: DJkTE: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members PlanningjCommission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator 7 July 17, 1987 SUBJ: #1128 Rainey Anderson, 780 S. Old Crystal Bay Road - Revised Preliminary Subdivision - Referred back to Planning Commission Note: Council reviewed the original preliminary subdivision proposal on June 8th and tabled to June 22nd pending additional information regarding soil testing and potential revisions to the proposal. Applicants did revise their proposal to included 2 additional lots, extention of the road portion to be developed, and inclusion of a 50' road outlet to connect to the Kumlin plat at some future time. The item was tabled at applicants request with no discussion on June 22nd. After receipt of a revised plan. Council referred the revised proposal back to Planning Commission for additional review. The neighboring property owners were mailed a notice of this meeting on July 16th. List of Exhibits - A - Revised Proposal - Preliminary Plat B - Memo & Exhibits of 7-8-87 C - Memo 6 Exhibits of 6-18-87 D - Council Minutes of 6-8-87, 6-22-87, 7-13-87 Pertinent Facts - -Lots and Blocks have been renumbered. - See Exhibit A. Each proposed lot contains in excess of 2.0 dry acres. -The cul-de-sac road to be developed is now approximately 750* in length to directly serve the existing house and 4 new lots, plus designating Outlets B and C to provide for future private road extention to Lot 3, Block 1 and future potential connection to Kumlin's plat road if this at some point becomes a public roadway. Loti, Block 1 will include the area south of the proposed road and this maintains the buffer that neighbor Blair at 790 Old Crystal Bay Road had hoped for. -The access location has been addressed by City Engineer Cook and City Attorney Blatz in the memo of June 4, 1987. They feel the City would be hard-pressed to deny a plat with access location that meets the minimum standards even though we feel some other location would be better. -A review of the septic testing information submitted indicates that soils are generally suitable for mound systems on all lots. However, the soil testing report submitted does not key the tested sites to scale on the proposed plat, and this must be done by the surveyor to verify that tested sites will not be encroached upon oy tne revised road location. Zoning File #1128 July 17, 1987 ^ Page 2 -Staff again notes that the small ponding area defined by elevation 940 between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 should be subject to a Conservation and Flowage easement and excluded from the dry buildable area. Note that extendincf Outlot B would cross this wetland, and a conditional use pennir would be required at the time Lot 3 is developed. ' Lot Block I as a result will contain less than 6.53 dry acres. Staff notes that future development of Lot 3, Block 1 would likely require a cul-de-sac if it is divided up; staff advises applicant that approval of the current proposed subdivision does not guarantee that the City would approve variances to lot area to divide this lot into 3 lots in the future. Staff Recommendation - Staff recommends approval of the revised preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1.Access location to be at existing driveway entrance as proposed by applicant. 2.Plat road Outlot A to be developed now to serve Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2. 3.Outlot B provided as corridor for future private road access to Lot 3, Block 1. 4.Outlot C provided for future roadway connection to Kumlin plat road; this will stay as a private road outlot, not developed but available to create a "through” route if these private cul-de-sac roads ever become public roads. 5.Standard road and utility easements and private road maintain covenant to be filed with the plat. 6.Standard drainage and utility easements to be shown on plat along lot lines. Provide a 20* wide drainage easement along swale at heck of Lot 1, Block 1. 7.Conservation and Flowage Easements to be dedicated over the two major wetlands and over the low area below elevation 940* straddling the line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. 8.Payment of standard park fees of $200 each for Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, and $100 for Lot 3, Block 1.Total = $900. 9.Private road construction subject to Developers Agreement. 10.Surveyor/Site Evaluator to identify septic testing locations on preliminary plat to verify no conflicts with revised lot lines or roadway. p r . yrrc!^’ • i) JiTY ' o? ‘Imi4^mx City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ___ A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 780 SODTB OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD APPLICATION NO. 1128 WHEREAS, Rainey Anderson on March 18, 1987 filed a formal subdivision application with the City of Orono for approval of a four-lot residential plat of property legally described as follows: P.I.D. No. 04-117-23 43 0004: The North 206.00 feet of the West 55 SUBDIVISION NUMBER 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, recorded plat thereof; and P.I.D. No.04-117-23 43 0005; rods of Lot 26, AUDITOR'S MINNESOTA, according to the That part of the North 25 1/4 rods of the West 55 rods of Lot 26 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying South of the North 206 feet thereof; and P.I.D. No.04-117-23 43 0006: The North 99.10 feet of the South 379.50 feet of the West 948.50 feet of Lot 25, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof; ALSO The South 280.40 feet of the East 569.00 feet of the west 948.50 feet of said Lot 26; and P.I.D. No.04-117-23 44 0003: That part of Lot 26, AUDIICL'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying East of the West 948.50 feet thereof. WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 20, 1987, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the application was revised to a six-lot residential plat on June 18th, 1987, and, whereas, the neighboring property owners within 350 feet of the subject property were duly notified of .revisions and the additional Planning Commission review to be held on Juxy 20, 1987, and the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the revised propos on July 20, 1987 at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning the revised application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; an Page 1 of 6 City of OROINO r TA.V ji • V., { } TY-'; 2-^rk -s '/> 3NQ>i RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2239_ _ _ _ _ WHEREAS^ at their regular meeting held on July 27, 1987 the Orono City Council considered the revised subdivision application of Rainey Anderson, noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2.The property contains a total of approximately 29.11 acres, of which approximately 20.07 acres is considered dry buildable. 3.The proposed plat contains six lots each exceeding the 2.0 acre minimum lot area requirement. 4.Proposed Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 and Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 require a variance because they do not have frontage on a public roadway. 5.All six lots are proposed to front on and access to a private road. Lot 2, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2 require a variance because they do not contain the required 200* lot width as measured at the 50' front setback line from the cul-de-sac, but do meet the 200' width standard if private road Outlot B is considered as part of the front lot line. Lot 3, Block 1 requires a variance because it does not have 200' of frontage abutting road Outlot B, but does exceed 200' in all dimensions. 6.The private road intended to serve the plat shall be constructed subject to the conditions of a developers agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Standards for this road are as follows: Right-of-way Minimum Width: 50' Minimum Paved Width: 24' Base: 8" Class 5 100% Crushed Surface: 3" 2341 Bituminous Surface Cul-de-sac: 50' Minimum Right-of-way Radius 40' Minimum Paved Radius 7.It is intended that the private road be privately owned and maintained. The City will require that the developer execute the standard road and utility easement over the private road, and shall execute the standard Declaration of Private Road Easement and Declaration for Maintenance of Same. It is intended that Outlot A be developed as a private road now, and that Outlot B shall be developed at such time that Lot 3, Block 1 is divided into 2 or more lots. Page 2 of 6 City of OROTVO pyia RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2239 ft * A secarate riqht-of-way outlet shall be shown on the plat as proposed Ke'^rlad fnd^tSe'pja? 'old^rS^^ plat of Lot 2, Block 1 of Foxwood so that these two roads may be connected if deemed necessary in the future 9.Three distinct wetlands exist within the property boundaries and will be subject to Conservation & Flowage Easements. 10. Due to the future potential for Jf ®°ion o°f^tCrystal Bay Road, it is appropriate to require the ded^ication^^ total of 20’ drainage and utility easement the "®®t It 1, Block 2, so that future potential road bank cuts do not interfere with utilities. 11.No additional right-of-way will be dedicated for County Road 84. 12 All four proposed lots of between 2 and 5 acres in acres in^area a^lid'L^ n“be tested for drainfield sites. 13.Single family residences can be constructed on each of the nev lots without the need for further variances. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, of the findings noted above, the City Council of bhe ?old Crystal Approves the preliminary plat for Rainey^^^^^^^ Bay Road per the survey attached as Exhioir a netew Surveyors, Inc. subject to the following conditions. w w — r — — 1.The location of the private road \he^existiM driveSa'south shall be as proposed by the applicant at the existing or entrance serving the existing residence. 2.A variance will be granted for Jl ^ ®y°as requ:fr^d. ^and 3, Block 2 which do not front on a public roadway as q 3.A variance will be granted to the 200* lot width standards fo Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2.I 4.All six lots shall access to the private road. Page 3 of 6 ••• r' s-5 /■ i'^!# ; • NC^ City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2239 ________ 5.The private road shall be constructed to City private road requirements, subject to a developers agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Private road construction can begin as soon as the engineering plans for the road have been approved by the City and the developers agreement has been executed. Plat road Outlot A is to be developed now to serve Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2. Outlot Bis provided as corridor for future private road access to Lot 3. Block iL At such time mat Lot j, dlodk i divided into 2 or more lots, Outlot B shall be developed to private road standards. Outlot C is provided for future roadway connection to the plat road of the subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Foxwood; this will stay as a private road outlot, not developed but available to create a "through" route if these private cul-de-sac roads ever become public roads. Outlots A and C shall be owned and maintained jointly by the owner of Lots 1 through 3, Block 1 and Lots 1 through 3, Block 2 and shall be included in the Declaration of Private Road Easement and Dedication for Maintenance of Same. 6.Standard road and utility easements and private road maintenance covenant to be filed with the plat. 7.Standard drainage and utility easements to be shown on plat along lot lines. Provide a 20' wide drainage easement along swale at neck of Lot 1, Block 1. Provide a 20* wide drainage and utility easement along the west line of Lot 1, Block 2. 8.Conservation and Flowage Easements to be dedicated over the two major wetlands and over the low area below elevation 940’ straddling the line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. 9.Payment of standard park fees of $200 each for Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, and $100 for Lot 3, Block 1. Total « $900. 10.Payment of revised application fee for the revised proposal in the amount of $325.00 per staff memo of 7/8/87. 11.No building permits will be issued until the private road base work has been completed and been approved by the City. 12.The private road shall be allowed to access directly to County Road 84 subject to conditions for such access as imposed by the Hennepin County Department of Transportation in their required access permit. 13.The private road shall be privately -owned and maintained per the appropriate access easement/maintenance documents to be executed by the developer. Page 4 of 6 ^4. I ■ i /SSl&v fe®- 1 '5^V ’-v& Italic* *S:>Vf: S^T' ia City of OliOlNO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2239_ _ _ _ _ The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1.RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1)copy reduced to l’*-200'. Drawing to include: a)Lot lines platted per preliminary DeMars and Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc. attached as Exhibit A hereto. b)Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" all perimeter property lines and 5 each side property lines, 20* along the west line of Lot 1, Block 2, and 20* in width along the drainageway in Lot 1, Block i. c)Designation and dedication of the wetlands as drainage easements on the plat. 2.LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: b)The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c)Signed and executed Flowage and Conservation Easement , area requiring description may be filled out as follows over the drainage easements as shown on the plat of (plat name/, . d)Signed and executed developers agreement and letter of credit for construction of the private road. e)Signed and executed road and utilities easement over the private road outlots. f)Signed and executed "Declaration of Private Road Easement and Declaration for Maintenance of Same". g)Completed "Application for Private Road Name FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $1,525.00 plus acre density * $100/lot. TOTAL- $900.00. b)Final plat fee ~ $150.00 c)Legal review and filing fees of $150.00. C A ^ ¥ f.. I % I II City of OROIVO wmr RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2239________ ^fl&asgr d)Additional fee for revised application - $325.00 Conceptually adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held July 27» 1987, by a vote of 5-0. Formally adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held August 10, 1987. ATTjfST; Jarn^s R. Grabek, Mayor othy M/ \j Hallin, City Cleric i Page 6 of 6 FLOWAGB AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND WAIVER OP DAMAGES THIS INDENTURE, made and entered into this day of 1^88 bv and between Rainey Hannah Anderson, a single person—h|^ )©a0x4w» hexrs, «nd .ucce..or« Iherein.fter c'olleAxvei^^ieK rred « the 0r.ntor(8)l and the City of Orono. i‘A (hereYn.'lGrantor(s)J and tne city or orono, i^s suct;c»»w*--,.«forr®dcorporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the Grantee). i WITNESSETH, Graritor(s), for and one Dollar (»1,00) and other valuablearant, gift, quit claim and convey to grantee the right to restrict ana 2^tr^tor(s) agree to limit and preclude the use, improvement and development, ^under the conditions and covenants follow^ig described Land in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota: over the drainage easements as shown on the plat of TREES TO BE as follows: 1, Grantor(s) hereby covenant and agree(s): A.HO structures shall be A‘^®®*®iV™4t«t^ln“*£ence8!above, or beneath the land including without *®?f**; firepl&ces# steps# docks# piers# hardcover or 4 whatsoever, or any other structure or improvement inconsistent with the natural state of the Land. Be No trees, shrubs or other vegetation or removed from the Land except as authorized by of Grantee. fI ;:;t,r”i°al*‘o?"sibs\r=e lltli or^any^Shiige^rth^topogr^^^^^ Land without the written consent of Grantee. the Land. E.NO use shall be made of the Land e>"=«Pt “»®*V tl. L«d. «dwill not change or alter the natural condition no use which would tend to change the dra ge^^flo^^^ water conservation, erosion control, so . , Land or the wildlife habitat characteristics shall be made of water situated thereon. F.Grantee may enter upon the Land for h**®■ inspection and enforcement of J*** A-bility any to cause to be removed from the Land without any matter * structures, uses, materials, substances, or unnatura j i inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the nature state of the Land. i 2.Grantor(s) hereby grant* gift* quit claim and convey to Grantee* a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and tTp^on any or all of the Land. 3, Grantor(s) herein do hereby remiss* release* acquit and forever discharge* forever* the Grantee and any and all of its officers and employees of and from any and all claims* demands or causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever which may arise or accrue by virtue of any flowage or trespass with water within terms of these agree* ments. In addition to any other remedy the Grantee may have* the covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. Grantor(s) do not intend that the public should have any interest in the above land by virtue of this Indenture or otherwise* except as hereinabove set forth. The Grantor(s) herein certify that the land herein described are free and clear of all encumbrances except: None All provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs* successors* representatives* grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. Rainey K^nnah Anderson STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) On this day of_ _ _. July_ _ _ _ _ _ _198^ before me a Notary Public within and for said County and State* personally appeared Rainey Hannah Anderson> a single person_ _ _ _i__ known to me to be the person«sa described in and who executed the foregoing instrument* and acknowledged that she executed the same as free act and deed. ■/\.W*>‘A^AlVV^VV^Wl^V^A^^/WV^/VVVV^A ■ ' MICHiEl T HOEKSTRA NOTARY PUeilC-MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY : M| Commiuicn Eipires Sepl 23,1033 ^ \ iO^RY VuBLIC Sept. 28. 1988 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES This instrument was drafted by: POPHAM* HAIK* SCHNOBRICH* KAUFMAN & DOTY* LTD. 4344 IDS Center* Minneapolis* MN 55402 (612)335-9331 OCT-27-2000 16:41 G.?y Fmahmler Center K-.YS.l5ft19,NavaiTe -»x1: :£-:oaatfywoodRoad EiceUiocMNS5331-9578 Pttone: (952) 4714)590 (952)471-0682 • •-Td: ItilnORdMMhahaoteek^ •‘leOSto: WAWininnehataereeicofB 3aard of Managers FaneiaG.BOxt JacMCalidns •jnceFaher Monica f^oas Scott Thomas Malcolm fWd Robed Sduomler MINNEHflHfl CREEK UWTERSHED 6124710682 P.01/02 Minnehalia Creek Watershed District Improving Qualify ofWater, Quality ofLift Date: lojofoa To: CiTt cF From: Barbara Moeller, District Technician We have received the attached permit application for a project within your city. This application is tentatively s^eduled for a MCWD Board of h6uiagers meeting on .Njflt/.. If you have any concerns, comments or objections regarding tlus project please contact Barbara Moeller, District Technician, at 471-0590 vnthin five days of reodpt of this notice. You may also FAX comments to 471-0682 or send a message via E-mail to: bmoeUef@nunnebahacreek.org Thank you for your cooperation. .6:41 kinnewhr creek URTERSHED 6124710662 P.02/02 WATEBSH6D DISTBlUl OCT 2 6 ZOOO ) is this form lo noUfy/apply to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), lliclr engineering consul^ts, the DNR, and the Hennepin Conservation District ofa proposed waier/wetland project or work which may fall within their iurisdiction.. Tnese agencies should advise you of their jurisdiction or permit letjuiremcnts within 10 days. Fill out tliis form completely tnail a copy, vri* plan, maps. etc... the MCWD, Gray Freshwater Center, Navaire, 2500 Shadywood Road Suite 37, Excelsior, MN 55331. Keepacopy for your records. YOU MUST OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED autho rizations before beginning work ._____^__; 2 Location of preposed preject (Aoadi drawing w/dlrecUons to site): COUNTY QTR SECnONCs) SECTIONts) TOWNSHIPfs) RANGE(s) Phone N JECT ADDRESS:"1 Lot, Block, Subdivision,'xpseb'v pe 37 LENGTH OF SHORE AHnSCTEU (In VOLUME OF FILL OR EXCAVATION (Cubic yards): ‘: area filled or excavated is Acres, OR \S^CO Square Fed. 4.OF PERMIT BEING APPLIED FOR: (Check all that apply): □.STOPvMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Q R^OODPLAIN ALTERATION □STORM SEWER OUTFALLS □ICE RIDGE REMOVAL lj;SHORS-:-rNE IMPROVEhiENr a.^FlfAvA? b.QS^' ‘jBLANKET c aRETAlKING wall OrKHR (DESCRIBE)_________ □BRIDGE A CULVERT CROSSINGS ^WETLAND ALTERATION □excavation 'DREDGING) a.^ V . .v£ b.(~l i'i.^'. r\'"jAi’?ON €.□ BIOENGINEERING 4a APPLICANT’S REPRESENTATlVEi (Licensed Contractor, Engineer, etc...) Include ne. address & phone number. ‘t^4ve. 6.ALTERNATIVES (describe any olhsr sites or methods that could be used 10 achieve the purpose of your project while avoiding or mir.imtztng w^ter/weiland impacts. Attach additional sheets, if needed. 7 OATES: Proposed start of activity;■^posed completion; (Identify any completed work on attached drawini)*•''____Iwing) 8.NAMES.& ADDRESSED OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS (Anach list If mor?) 9.PER.MITS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED (R) OR APPLIED FOR (A) FROM: COUNTY_____CITY .. MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY DNR ARMY CORPS OF ENOR I hereby notify the recipients of this fomf of Ute project proposed herein and request I be advised of any permits or other determinations concerning this projea that I must obtain. I understand that proceeding with work before all required authonza t are obtained may be subject lo FoderaL State and/or local admLustrative. civil and/or criminal penalties. G ♦I � La STl685 8AY, X.l. � N:A'TH ARM G 4vdw i « J !«•i1 UUI MiiMa n •• C3-//7-A9- 33 ! I'SK •f f t>^in-fi3.h^M'j-da-h 1 1 /d-tl%A3~J^ • • V. \- lUN DATE l«/Z5/*« lATCH 5t2 HENNErXN COUHTY fROrERTY IMFORHATXOH SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIASSAOl PACE 3 PROP AOim OWNER NAME TAKPAYER NAME/AOOR SO t9-U7>23 12 CCRl •RtSO ADDRESS UNASSXnffiD 6 t D MUST CEOROE A MUST 020 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 SO 99-117-23 12 9002 09049 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD A J ELLIS A J ELLIS 049 CRYSTAL DAY RD WAYZATA HN 55391 SO 99-117-23 12 0994 09094 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD S METRO WASTE CONTROL COHN METRO WASTE CONTROL CONN 350 METRO SQUARE DLDO ST PAUL MN . 55191 OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 30 99-117-23 12 9995 09059 OLD CRYSTAL SAY RD S H D ELLWEIN EEL ELLWEXN MICHAEL 0 ELXZASETH ELLWEXN 059 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 30 99-117-23 12 9990 09099 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD J A I H W TROUP JOHN A S NAROARET W TROUP 099 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 30 99-117-23 12 9999 09930 ADDRESS UNASS16NED CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 SOX 44 CRYSTAL DAY MN 55323 r* OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANR/ADOR SO 10-117-23 22 9992 99045 WILLOW OR S 0 A t A E ANDERSON OXLSERT A ANDERSON 045 S WILLOW OR WAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL DATCH 592 99925 r i U ) ^ ‘J -i OF MY KNOWLEDOE AND RELIEF. DATE ( t MM DATE lt/25/Ot MTCH 512 PROP AODR 0«MeR HAMC TANPAVER NAME/AOOR U IS-U7-2S SS tROI •••SO ADDRESS IMASSI6NED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 DOX AS CRYSTAL DAY HN SS32S HEHHEPIH COUNTY PROPERTY XHFORHATIOM SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 3« M-I17-2S AS WOOS 02475 FOX ST P J SLOCUH « E E 6ILLI6AN . PETER SLOCUH S ERIN 0ILLI6AN 2475 FOX ST WAYZATA HN 55S9X REPORT NO. PX4S5401 PACE 2 SO 0A-I17-2S AS 0009 02425 FOX ST DOE PETERSON DAVID E PETERSON 2425 FOX STREET WAYZATA HN 55S9X ;i PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR SO 0A-117-2S AS 0012 02725 RAXNEY RO H F RANLER 1 E XAHLER H F KANLER 0 E XAHLER 2725 RAXNEY RO WAYZATA HN 55S91 SO 0A-1I7>2S AS OOlS' 02405 RAXNEY RO R S S S S VXCKERHAN R SCOTT VXCKERHAN SUSAN S VXCKERHAN 2405 RAINEY RO WAYZATA HN 55391 SO 0A>117-2S AS 0015 027S0 RAXIMY RO HARY STUART FOX NARY STUART FOX 27S0 RAXNEY RO WAYZATA HN 55S91 PROP AODR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SO 0A>117-2S AS 0014 02490 RAXNEY RO J T OUCMARHE OSH DUCHAMfE JOHN T t SHERYL N DUCHAMtE 2490 RAXNEY RO WAYZATA HN 55S91 SO 0A-117-2S AS 0017 OOOSO AOORESS UNASSX6NED TREES TO RE PRIVATE RO ASSOC TREES TO DE ASSOCIATION 2770 RAXNEY RO WAYZATA HN 55391 SO 0A-117-2S AS 0010 OOOSO AOORESS UNASSX6NE0 K N 0 P H OURTON KIRSTEN 0 PATRICK OURTON 91 OAKVXEW TER SHORT HILLS NJ 07070 r-OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SO 0A-117-2S AS 0019 OOOSO AOORESS UNASSXONEO TREES TO DE PRIVATE ROAD ASC TREES TO DE PRIVATE ROAD ASSOCIATION INC 2770 RAINEY RO WAYZATA HN 55S91 30 0A-117-2S AS 0020 00450 GANDER RO PETER J CAPELL PETER J CAPELL 450 GANDER RO WAYZATA HN 55S91 30 0A-117-2S AS 0021 007S0 GANDER RO HARIA S ANDERSON HARXA S ANDERSON 7S0 GANDER RD WAYZATA HN 55391 Vlrc-!.,t 4 r so 0A-117-2S AS 0022 PROP AOOR OOOSO AOORESS UHASSI6NEO OWNER NAHE V D F KUHLXN ET AL TAXPAYER ' DENNIS F KUHLXN PO DOX 055 WAYZATA HN 55S91 NANE/ADDR 30 0A-117-2S AA 0002 02555 FOX ST P E ECKERLXNE/H A ECKERLXNE PETER E ECKERLXNE 2555 FOX ST ORONO HN 55S91 30 0A-117-2S AA OOOA 02401 RAXNEY RD K H 0 P H BURTON KIRSTEN I PATRICK BURTON 9' OAKVXEW TER SHORT HILLS NJ 07070 r PROP AOOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AMNI 3f 0A<117-2S AA 0005 00710 GANDER RO D L DANIELS 0 X B BURNS DAVID B KATHLEEN DANIELS 710 GANDER RO ORONO HN 55S91 30 09-117>23 11 0007 00090 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO SS5 BROWN RO CRYSTAL BAY HN 55S2S SO 09-117-2S 11 0010 02A4S FRENCH LAKE RD ROBERT J S JOAN L DAYTON ROBERT J t JOAN L OAYTON 1 FRENCH LAKE RO WAYZATA HN 55S91 f 3 w v.«- L To:Chair Hawn and Planning Commission Members City Cow)cil Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Mike Gaf&on, Senior Planning Coordinator November 15,2000 4 Subject:Replacement Page 1 for Draft RPUD Ordinance (/3i Please replace your current page 1 of the Draft RPUD ordinance with the attached corrected page, which incorporates "Multi-family attached dwellings" as a permitted use. This was left out in error, given that one of the primary purposes of the ordinance is to allow such use! _ SEC. 10.33 RPUD RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. P Subd. 1.Purpose. The purpose of the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) district is to provide a district which will encourage the following: A.fle,xibility in land development and redevelopment in order to utilize new techniques of building design, construction and land development; B.provision of housing to meet lifecycle, and low affordable and moderate cost housing needs; C.energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and sitings and the clustering of buildings and land uses; D.preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, poor soils and trees; E.high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; F.sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along significant corridors within the city; and G.development which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Subd. 2.Permitted Uses. Within the RPUD District, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A.Anv ‘Permitted Use’ as regulated in the R-IA District (Ed. Notes this includes one-family single dwellings; public owned parks and playgrounds; and municipal buildings). B.Multi-family attached dwellings. Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within the RPUD district, no land or structure shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: (Ed Note: Conditional Uses listed in the R-IA District include Schools; Churches; Clubs, Camps, etc.; Public Ser\ ice Structures; Greenhouses; Private Recreation Areas; Guest Houses & Guest Apartments; PRD’s; Duplex credit; Farms; Animak; Stables and Barns; Riding Academy; Plumbing in Accessory Buildings. None of the conditional uses listed in the R-IA District conceptually fit into the RPUD District, except perhaps Public Service Structures). C.Public Ser\ ice Structures. Public service structures, including but not limited to electric transmission lines, buildings such as telephone e.xchange stations, booster or pressure regulating stations, wells, and plumbing stations, elevated tanks, lift stations and electrical power substations, provided no building shall be located within 50' from any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District. % V ) . Application Date: 10/16/00 60 Day Deadline:IIJIS/OO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT; Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner November 13,2000 #2634/2635 G & G Holding Company Stanley and Luella Goldberg 1122 and 1140 Loma Linda Avenue Lot Line Rearrangement Vacation of Public Alley Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: List of Exhibits: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District 19,500 s.f. Total A B C D E F G H I J K Application Certificate of Survey (Existing) Plat Map Certificate of Survey (Proposed) Utility Map Proposed Access and Utility Easement Site Topography Parcel B Site Plan - Variance Request Hardcover Calculations Elevation View Property Owners Notification List Application Summary: Applicants have proposed a three part application that includes the following: 1.Vacation of a portion of a platted alley (labeled “Service Road ” on the Certificate of Survey - Exhibit B). The purpose for the vacation is to eliminate an access that has not been used and would be difficult for any use in the future due to steep topography. 2.Rearrangement of a common property line (As shown on the Certificate of Survey - Exhibit D). 3.Hardcover, lot area and lot width variances to permit greater than 25% hardcover on Lot 13 in the 75-250' lakeshore setback for construction of a new residence and to create two “RECORD LOTS” (As shown as proposed Parcels A and B on the Certificate of Survey). 12634/2635 GAG Holdinf Company Sunle>' and Luella Goldberg 1 122 and 1140 Loma Linda Avenue Page 1 Lot Area: (Proposed)Parcel A (1122 Loma Linda) 14,400 s.f. ^ Parcel B (1140 Loma Linda) 8,500 s.f. ♦Lot area totals include the land area from the proposed vacated alley Required Minimum Lot Size 43,560 s.f. I.Vacation The portion of the alley proposed to be vacated is undeveloped public right-of-way that has not been used for any public purpose, except for sewer service. The City of Orono does not intend to develop or maintain the alley. A portion of the alley would not be vacated because it serves as the only public access for the lot located at 1140 Loma Linda. Staff has indicated the location of the sewer line on the Certificate of Survey. Part of the alley proposed to be vacated contains the sewer service. A condition of the vacation would require an access and utility easement over the portion of vacated alley that is used for sewer service. II.Lot Line Rearrangement Applicants are owners of all properties involved in the rearrangement. They have proposed a Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement between the lots that results in both lots increasing in size, based on the alley vacation being approved. Parcel B is currently developed with & cabin, Parcel A undeveloped but had a cabin in the past. Each of the two parcels ere assessed for sewer in 1970. The future intent is to construct new houses on both Parcels A and B. Both lots, however will remain undersized for their respective zoning district. The LR-IB district requires a 140' lot width and a minimum lot size of one acre. The property ONMiers have requested variances to consider both lots as “RECORD LOTS”. The properties were developed prior to the adoption of the zoning ordinance. Lots 17 and 18 (Parcel A) have had a previous lot combination and are considered as one record lot by the City of Orono. Section 10.24 LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District Lot Lot Front Side Lakeshore Width Yard ^Yard 929.4' OHWL 1 acre 140 feet 35 feet 10 feet 75 feet «2634/2635 C & C Holding Company Sunley and Luella Goldberg 1122 and 1140 Loma Linda Avenue Pa£j2 •f Lot Area and Yards Parcel A Existing Lot Size Lot Width (front) Proposed Lot Size Lot Width 11,987.5 s.f. 147.21 feet 14,400 s.f. 100 feet Parcel B Existing Lot Size Lot Width (lake) Lot Width (front) Pro posed Lot Size Lot Width (lake) Lot Width (front) 7,000 s.f. 55.6 feet 50 feet 8,500 s.f. 55.6 feet 30 feet Lots in the LR-IB district are required to be 140' wide at the front yard setback. Each lot would require a variance to permit a lot width less than what the district requires and a variance to lot area and width. Staff Recommendation of Lot Line Rearrangement: •Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rearrangement and to grant variances to lot area and width that will allow both lots to be buildable, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. Applicant shall grant drainage and utility easements along new property lines. Applicant shall provide to the City any documentation relating to easements on both properties. Prior to City Council review 3 original surveys of the survey completed by a licensed surveyor in the State of Minnesota shall be submitted, with signature blocks. Variances be granted for lot width and lot area for both Lots A and B and both shall be considered RECORD LOTS. Applicant shall grant an access and utilit>* easement over vacated portion of alley as depicted on Exhibit F. •2634/2635 G ft 0 Holding Company Stanley and Luella Goldberg 1 122 and 1 140 Loma Linda Avenue Page 3 k III.#2641 Hardcover/Street Setback Variance Request (Parcel B) The applicants have propped to construct a new residence on proposed Parcel B should the Lot Line Rearrangement application be approved. The plans would include a 1,237 s.f. house to replace the 572 s.f. e.xisting cabin and removal of the parking and drive area located within the vacated right-of- way. The variance application has requested l,417s.f. (29.8%) ofhardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback where 1,187.5 s.f. (25%> are allowed. Proposed Hardcover Review 1,237 s.f. House 180 s.f. 1 - Outdoor Parking Space 1,417 s.f. ofhardcover has been proposed on the site. The Orono Zoning Ordinance requires two parking spaces per dwelling unit. The applicants have only provided enough hardcover for one space. An additional parking space shall be added to the plans, increasing hardcover. The Code also requires that open parking spaces on lots must have a location other than a required yard except that such parking may be located in a rear yard to within ten feet of an interior side lot line and to vsdthin ten feet of a rear lot line. The City of Orono generally requires a 9 ’ X 20’ space for one vehicle, two parking spaces would require an area 18' X 20' plus and additional 10' of driveway to move the vehicle parking area 1 O' f?T)m the property lines. The applicants have proposed one 9' X 20' (180 s.f.) for paiking. Staff would- recommend a minimum area of an 18' X 30' (540 s.f.) designated parking area. See Exhibit H. This would result in a final 75-250 ’ hardcover of 1,777 s.f. or 37.4%. No garage has been proposed on the property. The City has seen other applications in the past that do not propose garages at the time the house is constructed and later an application is received for garage construction. A garage could not be located where the parking area is proposed. That area is restricted from development because of the sewer line and eventual sewer easement located behind the house. The property owners do not intend to build a garage on this lot. Only two would be available for garage construction: 1) 2) Tf,» •'.ave a driveway access to the proposed house and attach a garage. To move the proposed property line forther to west. This option would increase the size of the lot within the 75-250' setback and allow more hardcover, but probably not enough to not require a variance. Hardcqver Issues for Consideration: Parcel B (0.20 ac. after vacation) is adjacent to the Beckmann property (0.44 ac.) which was held to the 25% hardcover limit when it was a teardown/rebuild just 2 years ago. The City h.as in recent years become much more restrictive in hardcover for teardown/rebuilds than in prior years. Does the smaller lot size of Parcel B in and of itself justify a hardcover variance? How docs the ‘large lot-large house, small lot-small house” theory apply? The proposed house is 1 ,237 s.f. i2634/2635 GAG Holding Company Sunley ird Luella Goldberg 1 122 and 1140 Loma Linda Avenue Page 4 r If variances are granted for a small house with no garage, is it possible to build a garage on the property in future due to the sewer easement? If no hardcover variance is granted, Does applicant wish to revise the lot line rearrangement to give more area to Parcel B? Because of the unusual access to the property, a front yard setback variance would be required. The north side of the property would be adjacent to the only public access to Parcel B. The LR-IB zoning district requires a 35' setback to the front lot line, which in this case would be the north property line. Staff would recommend approval of a variance to the 35' setback to the alley, and lequire a 10' setback be maintained based on the following: 1) 2) The alley has always provided access to Parcel B. The City does not intend to develop or maintain the filley. The alley would continue to be used privately by the owners of Parcel B for driveway purposes. 3) 4) The north property line would function as side, interior lot line. A 10' standard setback would be appropriate in this case. Requiring a 35' setback would not allow a suitable building site on what has historically been a residentially developed property. Summary of Actions Requested Planning Conunission should make recommendation to Council on each of these 3 topics: 1.Vacation of Alley 2.Lot Line Rearrangement (Lot Area/Lot Width Variances) 3.Hardcover and Setback Variances »2634.7635 C & C Holding Company Sunley and Luetta Goldberg 1122 and 1140 Loma Linda Avenue Page 5 Application #2 0,3 ‘■I A I oi' Z Date Received ioli to/nn Amount Paid S CITY OF ORONO - S(JBDIVISI0N APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATIONbKll L.Ui.At^ // J 1/ Site address /60 /HO //^Km ___________ Property Identification Number (PIP") 0^ ^ Please check one - Property ____abstract or _____torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT In//// ^ ^ Nam e 'Uotl/^ /f U Address ^3D r rC^i U'Cfi c( /'V♦ City q Aat^, Phone fliomel ^7/ Zip Phone (work)__g OWNER (if different than applicant . /j/ /) i / / Name / g . Z/y S/n.,/t^ j/a (//c bMiul. Address Tu 0x. Uhi/i, 'Phone (home)__ C’^tv 7=ZnrL ^ ZioJ^^^Phone (work)__Cirt^ _________ (attach list if more than one) ZipJ'y/ir^hone (work) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) 3 (X) / 9 Acres Dry Land ________ Acres Wet Land ________. Acres Total, all parcels __ Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______ Present Zoning District PROPOSAL _____ Division for Tax Purposes ___ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Number of Building Sites Subdivision for New Building Sites Existing Units />New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) JtJi. 9 CO Units per___Acres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify)_________ O 1 A ^ 2. Application # Date Received toJi ’s/oo Amount Paid 4 i-SO CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-confoiming structures $250.00 Afrer-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address FORMATION . ,, //^i)l>fAaa^. /7 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) -//7 "• 3 “ 3 ^4^/3 _________ Attach legal description to jippli^atiop if not included on required survey. DalftFroperty Acquired ^7^________________^(month/year) I(M<^do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property:residentizJ ___pother (specify)______________________ Zoning District:__________________________________________________________ ■'5r.> af C APPLICANT/ ^//V ^ - Name kJO Phone (horne d Address:fitr'iCrlfUC^c/- ____ Phone (worW, City: /Leno Zip: . \ OWNER Name Address «ER (if different than applicant). me da ^ (o ^arTAH sfiijo Idress: ^Ct9 /Jrnit^City: a Phone (homeX Phone (work)_ i A r- / /* " , ••*. • \. • •• DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: __ Estimated Construction Cost $ Zip: t>o i ■* (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ^ Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficult)' or unusud property c^ditions preventiM ^ compliance with Zoning Code requirements: a/kaJ: f £jl / (attach addi^nal sheets if necessaiy) ^.XAUhCM.icMBi* \ '� I ; I � . . -I I 11· � . " :_"" -r-:�-, _l ll •• • I ... "........... -� ��,..,..__ ..... -� , l :�-: ,,-,-I I -.-I 11 ·- . -. � "-. . � ,...: . -·,· C . • , • .. • .._ I t.• • ... •_j ,... "-: c.,�r61_ lJ'.:� ; ,..:-:,. ...:-� �-1�-: I , ,<· • • • • -.:;:.;_ • {."/ x� --"'-.-�,.,, ... -� .. . \, "' ... .. ., ·., -:--�. · ,/ () -i"i � .. �--.....,.·:·:,/OF LOTS 13-18, BLOCK -8, L·OMA LINDA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ..... . •. · - _._ .. _ ...... -" .... ·��:•..:.·· -.• -.: .. : ... ·�-..,·A.•A :..�-i -.---o' // .....·.f XIST IN 6 'P�o L·1N£S . .. . > I< z-.. _J <( I 00 • L()N - w -. 00 -. 0 0 z _·, 90 °f O' 00 '' E \_ ·,·I ..... 40 oo --... _ .. . ..-.�. _ .. ·· ··:• .. . . . . ··r·· / ""' 0 0 0 l{)..- iG0.00 IIII >-20 I < ,----11 !rl.: ; I ; � Lo�A' . I� !:-: L 'NOA-;• I; I . � �(u�o,via..�P£04' IIIII 1 ---�------------ EAST �60.00 3� VACATf 1.� I .•. 3 -.0 0 0 0 (/) . SS-W5f\ &. INI t, ,:: � >►> j - .. ...-.. •··········· ··· N 90 °00' 00" E . . . . .. 128.50 · .. ·•. ····... 22 �-·=··· 55.08 ...... ...... Ji�49 .--.._ 35.9"' ... -/7 \ .,J ., • . . I I fa. -, 12' ic,iil 1 �i�o LoM/' ----•----'--� -� !_'! #,! _ -EAST 104.07 ..... -r-SURV�-� . 11 'iLINE ·-�1� I I � I § · ... - -,._'° ·y I � � : -. .. _____________ .,___ _ ____________________ _,]_, ___ _I • r,;,, rv a .. -• \ -I , I. . � . .. .· 1 .. • . • . . !':• DdlliG� . ': lJJ EXISTNG HD�:!a ., -/.:,... : . !:;. / � . � g . . .· .· ,;, •....... ..... .. . . . . .. .. . -�i,,. .. . .. .................... ··:I CV 0 j •./ ... 0 :C !\# • ·.Io : · -J.0 -·_....., ____ �..-,--._.-�---------�------..._--�---� d¾ --- LAKE r ( r r r ( ( r t ( '• , .. (17) 14 (18 ) 15 (19) 18 (20)'fr.,.17 (2 1 ) ... 1,1 ,., ,,...; :'I :: i I . • • • • "' I _ -1•�� ·-. . . _55. . �7. 1" -� . .. _1�.05 DAHL RD ······· --·-···-·--.. • -- ·---·-··--�-··--•--· ----- .. ·--------♦ ---------- (3)� ---· m•· .. ,.., ..... o_ C {l?,_-:43-:__ LAKESI E 1 (70)1 2 (71) HEIGH S (56) 1◄7 (2) 331.5 331.9 (55) f'I ...... (1) ··-•-"'"..... ·---·- (24)8 31 (28) ·---· . 5.. ·,-... . .. , ..... ···- ........ ·-· .... . 40,50,50 50,50,30 ' ' ' ' __ _.;;c�i __ .... � ..... • 1 •0a z _(85_)_,. ___ _.• i • • • 0 (8) --•"'--• . ··-.. ' !'.on ... rt .... . (7) (14) -II •9,. ···-- ---� (61) .. --··-------·-·· -· (12) • - • -. . . . . . .,(60) •a ,. 'SI •·-------------8 I I (54 • . 111 .. .. •.. --· ·--.. - a a (62) 1 (67)1 (6) ' ' ti) • I V, W, ' 1ft tft .... . ... .. .. ... � N 31: 30 :�21 28 �. 27 �-21� ' (7) • · (2 3) ·- : .... ... -�-.. ··: ... ·:-.. -: (22) : 0 7 I I I • tll, ( ca 40 : 50 : · 50 50 : 50 : 40 ····· ... · · ·· · B).. • ..� ·�-. � •····--: --: -W a 2131 � :(19 j (2 0� �� �: � > -· -----2>-g 20: 2 1 : 22 � 2 3 g: 24 � 25 g <( s (10)9 : ; : (2J) ··,10�5---·: : : 31.8 1081 (11);40 ; 50 : 50 50 : 40 --·--260 -· ··-·· ··--. (12) -280. ----····- 40 110 60 211 W 11 � ,:S iii 141.5 / .. 11 J:I 1, 11-12 "'! (18 ... (2 6) I ,54 (12) 5t .I ·-1 i i d:i � 50 __ 45__ I 133(13) 1_; -- . -� i ... -� ··-·-; / !l�5! �:-,i��---51/ (13)<D . ---0-- - · - · - .. :/ ..;J 270 / 2 (2) (68).. ······ .. --- i i -.... • • =' ••• ... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �, I , I I I I· ... .... . ..... ······· ...... ··-·1\. •••• ••••••:••:• ..... •••:•:::: • .::• .:::.::••::.. ••:•:-:: .:::::•• •• .::•.� ::::::• :.::.:. • ••• ::::. :•.::•::�:., -• ., .... ,., •-..... • . •• •••••, ••, •••••• .. ••-• • .-.m •--�-•· i I � ········· .................. ······-.... ······· ............ .. .. . .. ··•• .. .... . ... .... 929 Aft ... .. . . -.. ----- ----·-·---- ·-·-····· ······· .•...... -· ·····-··-··-·---· --· ···-·····-· .. . ... -·- . • .. "V .. -·-. ---·· .. -·-· • -...•... ·-·--.... ·----- - "" . . .......... ..... ........................ ·-·-· ...... ...................... ...... . .. ....................... ··-· -·--·····•·-···· . ~·-· . 92L9D:V•·· . . . ... .. .. ....... "'".-�-··· "'" , .... -............ ., ... _ ..... ., .... _ ... __ · ... · ····--..... ·· .......... . --•«•4 -•• •--•·u ••••• .. •••••••k» ,.,._, - o,, ••• •I•.,.•·• M•••-•'" ....... -····-····-·········-······--······ ............... -• .. ..... .•.. . . . ................. ········-·-............................ -. .. ······--····---.......... _, ..................... --. .... ...... .. ... . ... •-•• .......... -. •------....... • ... -.... ______ ., ...... «•• ·-·· ···--c-··-···•··· ... ·-····•····-··-··--·-· ..... -··•··· .. "" . ·----....•.... ·-······· -.. " . " ·--··--· -· . ---·-··· ·--· ·-.. -· ---------···-· -·-··--.. .. . ... ... . -··--······ .... -·· ---· -···- . .... ·•--···· .. ... .. ....... ··········"'········-··· ·-······ ............................. .. .. ··-······... . ............................. ···--..... ... l -. . . ... . . .... . . . . ,. ..•. ... .. .. . ... . ... . . . -.. -·· .. ·····-·-.. · . . ... -·· ................................ --······-.......... . ·-. ... .. . ·-··---· ..................... . ····· ----· ·-. -.,. .. ... --.. ••·••··· .... ··•·.•······· ...... . . . . ......... •-·· ···-·-..................... ...... ...... .. .... ·-•-"··-••'"····-··-··· .. ···-·-··· . ·····• oo ••• j '''"" ooOoooU 0,.-,0 • o obO• •••••-• o -�•• ,oo o■ooe,00 -•-•••I•-••• o·o ,o •• M••••••· ,,,..,,o o,t.· o•o ..... , ,,,_ ........ ooo ._-, 7 I (I•:-,,.C.f·-::...�• I. l \lj·.; I .. •-�-• .. ...; ... :r., �· R' !<".�· r. .•· .. \..... � ��-� � ;.' .. : . .: i:. ..... ~.· ': .,:.-:;_... .. • ....... _., .... . .�:-·-. -' . . . ' ... \,i . __ .:·./ t.> t) � , .. � . fft1 _, �1 �.,/ .... "�• �� OF .._'-'.._._..... "'"'._..,.__._. --� LOTS 13-18, BLOCK 8, L·OMA LINDA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ----/ i L oM A .L tND -A't��r A ·v· ;'.B!t 1 uE / ·· ·· -�RA "�t••l!"r\ · · · -.� �;i . . . ___ . •. • YL �U ·· , • •-• · � i PP-ofos£0 ?etof51l'f L ( • •• .• • • •.,_• ., •• • .... • • • 4 • • • •• •• • • • • - • -....!. _ • ..___ ... -....-•• s..... .,: •• ·-. ..- ........ "".-._ .�A•A �--;_ -._ . . . .·.� � 0 0 100.00 I I I I I 'I �. . 0 0 177 71 P1t.01'C \JACI ALL > z -.. _J <( _J • LO N- w --00... 00 0 0 0 z .. :t 90 °�0' 00" E \ .. ,•·· .. 40.00 ··•, .·. .. --'•i . . . . .··1·· ... . ... 0 0 0 L{) � .. ... r--·· ·-,. >< � lLJ >er0 L(J en �• • 0 0 II , ,.'P A�C. E�-, ! 1."'! I . ! / - ::c .... - ' • ------------,------ EAST � 60.C•'J NEW 0 0 (/) t DST·� j ,,>,>>>� >>> ?R·oP. , _ LINE., (J � ... <° .. -·····--···--·· ·· N 90°00' 00" E 128.50 ... ·•. .. 22 +3 L.-. ,_ ••' •• -, � ,• • . I --. •.. .. . , .• • , • • .. , • w ,, ..I •., . ' ..·-.... -'.") (\fMOv'e.. 55.08 ·1sT1 . c� . ·... 37.49 ... ···... 35.93 ... ·/1 ·: .. , :I l>A1t.ciL a-·I /2/:?'l I I I EAST 104-.07 / f\ SURV�Y / '? LINE ·-. · -�, zy I I I � I § •Oi ---,-----------�------_____________________ J ____ _I lj ··�1.,-. . . . '...... � .. ••. :A:...·LJ:1 W-... .. �,. --: _. I • .-- .. •1 :I 0 .... • If� I • 'a., • • I DilliNGflr"J MDlll,J-' ,'� .I� ....... ........... ... ... .. .... �l?. ... . ..... ..... . ........... f"< It l« < <L<1 / � = I ' � . � .J.� ------------+-------.-------------,�-���o�--�--: $0 M,IPQI . . . LAKE r\ 4 E."* D ■n J) Lr4 I O O 2a > r (rrr < (^ r 00 ( ( b f A LINDA AVt'NbL —o-------------------------------\ q 4^0 .o°o ?? N OO^OO' 00" E 125.00 .• • * ..•'••• \ DRIVEWAY S00®00'00”W 95.00 r ***'l *;^‘ *■*‘ • I- C\ k j! ^ i (/) CD '.V' O CJ •|ujn:).x)p padinssx) ux) uqdn pesoqv a jo UMoqW sOquoag' n V f". 'I «>. n \.\ ja><jo\{J uoij] sa:J^ouap\ « o \ i ' \ \ \ JD OJ \D cr^ C a ) vD 00 4::^^M6»^Q^M^\et g^O"1 \ \ IW3^ JD r|DIid\d3S3Hf 4:^ cr> 3SnoH L “•'«»; A .00, 91 9%9 3SnOH )0*06 S ►:c2i TBCT !)NUSIX3 00091 1S< 7 \ 3DIAa: i.'-: -\ \ ♦M 00 3 LOO/00.06 LI 81 /X / / / DOSING HOUSE ST«FF PKomf mm N 90®00'00" E ................................. 55.08 r 2^.7 ^Hevi PEXISTNG5 M 2'Hoo&C i 217* > ^ ^ S jA ^ M /IVfRA&C MKfSWo^t 5fcT9MK 128.50 35.93 •••>^ Parc El. S EAST 104.07 SURVEY LINE ia/24/2000 11:49 471-9801 JDELLEN HLRR P46E 03 HARDCOVER C ALCUIAUQSUWpX^HEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0.75 ’ .^TMSOO 250.S00* BVfCTiMc HAanrhvgpjM mm ^ ^^‘7.XA.Housf 900*1000* £Z2_sf- tMrJi width X X X B.Q«ngc C.Driv«w«y D.Sidewalk E.Pado/Dack r, Laodicape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric J£-X X X X X X X X X 0.Oth«r TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ______________B FUnEOSEDH A.Houit R IK ZONE Ms- B.Oirajf C.DfWtwty D.SldfwtQc E.Pacio/Dtek F.Landscape Undefliin By Plutic Or Fabric X X X X X X X X X X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. s.r. S.F. S.P. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ,SJ. S.F. xtOO - SJ. S.7. S.F. V* S.F. 3SV $0 A B O.Other X __/i/6 TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE /y/^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. RF. S.F. S.F. >.F. SJf. S.F. ’S.F. S.F. S.F. A S.F. B I ·-·'aP---··-.. ·-·· ·---· ·--. ·-·---··· . -·····,., . 1 r· ,, , .- .... ,# � i -., -' .. ·-•·• .. -· ····----------- -JA.a-----.... -- ., .. . · I: I ◄' . .... ---- I . I �•. , I! ;w--.... ·....,... ·=--a.a=-==-::a:1111111 .. . I ':• '••. ! i.• ' I I I I ; f IIt I, ,. . ' I.:I, .. ' . .. ' : .i ' • -------- ...... -...... . , : •11:t I • I •I f. • , • I I J-. --�◄, · ..... --��--------, • RUN 0*TE 09/21/00 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PX43S401 PACE 40 BATCH SSI PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO 07-117-2S 14 0004 01029 LOHA LINDA AVE R t R KNOX RALPH B KNOX 1029 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND NN 55S44 SB 07*117-2S 14 0007 0102S LOHA LINDA AVE LAVONNE SORENSON LAVONNE SORENSON 4027 VINCENT AVE N HPLS HN SS412 SB 07-117-2S 14 0012 0114S LOHA LINDA AVE JEFFERY D JOHNSON ETAL JEFF D JOHNSON 114S LOHA LINDA AV HOUND HN SS344 PROP ADDR OWNER NANS TAXPAYER NANC/AOOR SB 07-117-23 14 0013 OllSS LOHA LINDA AVE EUGENE SEVEN ETAL EUGENE A CEVEN IISS LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN 5SS44 SB 07-117-23 14 OOSS 01034 LOHA LINDA AVE H HURNER B B HURNER HARK HURNER 0 BRENDA HURNER 1034 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND NN SS344 SB 07-117-23 14 0041 01140 NORTH ARH DR TXHOTNV L BRO TIMOTHY L BRO 1140 NORTH ARM DR MOUND NN SSS44 PROP ADOR OWICR NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SB 07-117-23 14 0042 01140 NORTH ARM DR K A t L N KELSEY KENNETH A B LOURXTA N KELSEY 1140 NORTH ARM DR HOUND NN SSS44 SB 07-117-23 14 004B 0118S LOHA LINDA AVE D B 8 H J SANS DOUO B MARY SANS 11B5 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN SS344 SB 07-117-23 41 0007 01210 LOHA LINDA AVE DONALD R UDELL ET AL DONALD R B CAROLYN UDELL 1210 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN SSS44 i; '• '1'^ PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SB OB-117-23 2S 0002 OllBO LOHA LINDA AVE MATTHEW H BURNS NATTNEW H BURNS IIBO LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN SSS44 SB OB-117-23 23 0003 01190 LOHA LINDA AVE H A B E C MITCHELL HARK A/ELXZABETN C HXTCNELL 1190 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN SSS44 SB 0B-117-2S 2S 0004 OlOSB LOHA LINDA AVE T N B N L SCNAIBLE TODD N B HXCNELLE L SCNAIBLE lOBB LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND NN 55S44 la i: ^4 PROP ADDR SB 08-117-23 23 0007 01044 LOHA LINDA AVE OWNER NAME \ CAROL H RADUNZ TAXPAYER CAROL N RADUNZ NAHE/ADDR BROS RIVER BLUFF CXR BLOOMINGTON HN 55437 SB 0B-117-2S 23 OOOB 01074 LOHA LINDA AVE MARGARET E MATTSON MARGARET E MATTSON 1074 LOHA LllOA AVE HOUND HN 55344 SB 0B-117-2S 2S 0009 010B2 LOHA LINDA AVE D R JOHNSON B L H JOHNSON DEAN R B LISA N JO 1002 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN 55344 •9 . !“■I 4i nrof ADM OWHCR NAME TAXfAyCII NANC/AODR sa M-Ii7-2S 2S •Itaa LOHA LINDA AVE T N PETERSON S T A PETERSON TROY N t TRACI A PETERSON lift LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN 553M 30 00-117-23 23 itll OlOfO LOHA LINDA AVE ROBERT J 60UHTAN1S ROBERT J OOUNTANIS lifO LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN 553M SO 00-117-23 23 0012 01130 LOHA LINDA AVE N N OOCRHANN ET AL N/L EST NXLLIAN A OOCRHANN list LOHA LINDA AV HOUND HN SSSM Nj RUN DATE 09/El/tt BATCH 551 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORHATXON SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PZASSARl PACE El PROP AODR OWNER MANE TANPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP ABBR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAME/AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODR PROP ADOR OWNER NANE TAIVAVER NANE/AOOR liitN S§M-U7-25 23 ttlS •IMt LOHA LINDA AVE QIC N0LDXN6 CO LTD f TNftSNf 0 i 0 HOLDXNO CO LTD PTNUSHP C/0 LUCLU 60LDDE20 7tif TUPA DD EDINA m 55A39 33 33-117-23 23 3313 31143 LOHA LINDA AVE 0 3 0 HOLDING CO LTD f TNIISHf 0 3 0 NOLDXNO CO LTD PTN3SNP C/0 LIIELLA GOLDBERG 7313 TUfA DR EDINA NN 55333 33 33-117-23 23 3315 31173 LOHA LINDA AVE 0 3 0 HOLDING CO LTD PTNRSNP 0 3 0 HOLDING CO LTD f TNRSNP 7313 TUFA DR EDINA HN 55333 33 33-117-23 23 3313 33333 ADDRESS UNASSI6NED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 30X 44 CRYSTAL DAY HN 55323 33 33-117-23 23 3313 31135 LOHA LINDA AVE H C THORLO IDS THORLO HARR THORLO 3 DEBRA THORLO 1135 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN 55344 S3 33-117-23 23*3323 31127 LOHA LINDA AVE DALE F ROTH DALE F ROTH 1127 LOHA LINDA AVE HOONO HN 55344 33 33-117-23 23 3321 31113 LOHA LINDA AVE HILLIAN JOSEPH POLLARD HILLIAN J POLLARD 1113 LOHA LINDA AVE HOONO HN 55344 S3 33-n7-2S 23 3322 31345 LOHA LINDA AVE T 0 OSTERBERO/K J OSTERBERG TIHOTHY 0/RRISTI J OSTERBERG 1345 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN 55344 SB 33-117-23 23 3323 31335 LOHA LINDA AVE R C BROUN 3 H A BROUN ROSS C 3 NELINDA A BROUN 1335 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN 55344 33 33-117-23 23 3324 * 31122 LOHA LINDA AVE 3 H OQUNNERO 3 L 0 OOLDOERd STANLEY H/LOELU 0 GOLDBERG 7313 lOPA ST EDINA HN 55433 33 33-117-23 23 3327 31233 LOHA LXIOA AVE EDHUND GRIFFIN ET AL DONALD R UDELL 1213 LOHA LINDA AVE HOUND HN 55344 TOTAL BATCH B5l MB29 i ^ ■ I CCHTZFY THAT THE FACTS KEPHESEHTEO AXE AN ACCUHATE AND THUE REPHESENTATXON OF INFORHATZON AS XT APPEABS THIS BATE ON THE XECOROS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPAXTNENT OF PROPimV TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEOCE AND BELIEF. BATE PROPHTTV TAXATION. TO THE BESl N 7^ To:Chair Hawn and Planning Commission Members Ron Moqrse, City Administrator From: Date: Mike Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator November 17,2000 Subject:;i^2638 Proposed Zoning Code Amendment: 1)Revise “B-6 Highway Commercial District” standards to incorporate more detailed landscaping and architectural standards. 2)Revise B-6 list of allowed uses to include clinics. List of Exhibits A - Zoning Code Section 10.45 B-6 Highway Commercial District B - Proposed Replacement Section 10.45, Subd. 6 (H) C - Proposed Replacement Section 10.45. Subd. 6 (I) D - Highway 12 Corridor Excerpt from 2000-2020 CMP The landscaping and architectural standards being incorporated into the RPUD District can be equally applicable to the B-6 Commercial District. The B-6 landscaping standards in place are relatively minimal, contained in Subd. 6 (H), (K), (L) and (M) as follows: H.At least twenty five percent (25%) of the land area shall be landscaped with grass, approved ground cover, shrubbery and trees. At least three percent (3%) of the land area within a parking area shall be landscaped. The following minimum sizes shall be required at the time ofplanting" Overstory Deciduous Trees Ornamental Trees Coniferous Trees Major Shrub Plantings 2-1/2 inches in diameter 1-1/2 inches in diameter 6 feet tall 5 gallons 1.All trash and trash handling equipment shall be stored within the principal structure, within an attached structure accessible from within the principal structure, or totally screenedfrom eye-level viewfrom public streets and adjacent residential properties. If accessory structures are proposed, they shall be constructed ofthe same building material as the principal structure and be readily served through swinging doors. K.The ground level view of all mechanical utilities shall be completely screened from contiguous properties and adjacent streets, or designed to be compatible with the architectural treatment of the urincipal structure. L.External loading and service areas must be completely screened from the ground level viewfrom contiguous residential or commercial properties and adjacent streets, except at access points. #2638 B-6 Amendment November 17,2000 Page 2 M The light from automobile headlights and other sources shall be screened whenever it may be directed onto adjacent residential windows. The proposed standards for landscaping are attaclied as Exhibit B, and would replace Section 10.45 Subd. 6(H). Note that the standards in the current subsections H, I, K, L and M are incorporated into the new Subd. 6(H). The existing D-6 architectural standards in Subd. 6 include the following: J.Garages, accessory structures, screen walls and exposed areas of retaining walls shall be of similar type, quality and appearance as the principal structure. The proposed architectural standards are attached as Exhibit C, would replace subsection J with a new Subd. 6(1). The proposed landscaping and architectural standards are nearly identical to those proposed for the RPUD district, but an attempt has been made to eliminate residential use references, since the B-6 is a strictly commercial zone. Note that the office poition of the Dunbar project is being reviewed as a rezoning to B-6, and these general standards liave been forwarded to the developer’s landscape architect as a guideline. Add Clinic to List of B-6 Permitted Uses During the review of the B-6 Section and in attempting to determine which zoning district the Dunbar office project should fall under, staff concluded that rezoning to B-6 would be necessary as oppsed to B-4, because B-4 does not allow PUD’s. While the B-4 Office and Professional District lists "Clinics. Clinics for human care on an outpatient basis only" as a permitted use, the most closely related B-6 permitted, use is "A Offices (business and professional)". Staff feels it would be appropriate to add "Clinics for human care on an outpatient basis only" to the list of permitted uses in B-6. This would more correctly accommodate the medical office building proposed at the Dunbar site, and is generally in keeping with the City’s intent for the B-6 district as identified in CMP Amendment #2 (the 1988 Highway 12 Corridor Study) which is carried forward in the 2000-2020 CMP (Excerpt attaclied as Exhibit D). Unfortunately, this did not come to light until after the notice for the B-6 amendment was published. Consequently, no formal hearing can be held on this element of the proposed amendments. However, if Planning Commission feels this is a non-controversial amendment, a hearing could be held at the Council level in December or early January at the discretion of the Council. #2638 B-6 Amendment November 17,2000 ^ Page 3 Staff Recommendation Planning Commission should recommend that Council adopt the proposed revisions to the landscaping and architectural standards of the B-6 District per attachments A and B. Planning Commission should recommend that Council hold a public hearing for the purpose of adding "Clinics. Clinics for human care on an outpatient basis only." to the list of B-6 permitted uses. !i L.'Cm £mte.irA §10.45 SEC. 10.45 B-6 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of the B-6 Highway Commercial District is to provide a commercial district specifically tailored to accomplish the commercial development objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study Section of the Orono Comprehensive Plan. Subd. 2. Application. All applicants for a building permit in any "B-6” Highway Business District shall be reviewed by the Council and referred to the Planning Commission for review. Subd. 3. Permitted Uses. Within any "B-6’’ Highway Business District, no structure or land shall be used e.xcept for one of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the Council: A.Offices (business and professional). B.Banks and financial institutions. C.Libraries. D.Motels, and hotels. C.Restau ran ts (Class 1).Deleted via Ordinance No. 152,2nd Series Effective Date: 10-28-96 Subd. 4. Relationship with Chapter 10.53 Planned Unit Development. Other types of commercial uses and mixed use developments may be applied for through the planned unit development process. Applications that include commercial uses within the Highway 12 Corridor shall assume the B-6 District as the underlying zoning district. Subd. 4.1. Conditional Uses. A.Within any "B-6" Highway Business District, no structure or land shall be used for one of the following uses except by conditional use permit: 1.Restaurants (Class I). 2.The following uses when such use includes a drive-thru condition; a.Offices (business and professional). b.Banks and financial institutions. c.Libraries. d.Motels and hotels. Source: Ordinance No. 152,2nd Series Effective date: 10-28-96 ORONO CC 351-1 (Sec. 10.45:5-8-89) ■A §10.45 Subd. 5. Accessory Uses. Within any "B-6" Highway Business District, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: A.Any accessory use as regulated in the "B-l" Business District. Subd. 6. Area, Height, Lot Width, Setback Requirements and Design Requirements. The following minimum requirements shall be observed subject to additional requirements and exceptions contained in Section 10.52 of this Title. A.Lot Area: B.Lot Width: C.Setback - Principal Structure: two acres 100 ft. Front 30 (35) ft. Side Interior 10 (35) ft. Side Street 30 (35) ft. Rear 30 (35) ft. D.Setback - Accessory Structure Front 30 (35) ft. Side Interior 10(35) ft. Side Street 30 (35) ft. Rear 30 (35) ft. E.Setback - Parking Front 15 (20) ft. Side Interior 5(10) ft. Street Side 10(15) ft. Rear 10(10) ft. Setbacks in parentheses apply adjacent to all residential districts. ♦30 (35) feet or 1 1/2 times the building height whichever is greater in determining front setbacks for principal and accessory structure only. F.Drainage. No land shall be developed and no use shall be permitted that results in water runoff causing floods, erosion, or deposits on adjacent properties. Site and drainage plans shall be submitted by the applicant in such detail as required by the Council and those plans ORONO CC 351-2 (Sec. 10.45: 5-8-89) 4 §10.45 shall be reviewed by theJTity Engineer before submission to the Planning Commission and Council for approval. Such runoff may be required to be properly channeled into a natural water course, ponding area, storm drain or other public facilities. Any change in grade affecting water runoff whether onto adjacent property or otherwise must be in compliance with the Surface Water Management Plan and shall be consistent with other applicable regulations or City Code provisions and subject to the approval of other agencies having jurisdiction over the area affected by the drainage. G.Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. H.At least twenty five percent (25%) of the land area shall be landscaped with grass, approved ground cover, shrubbery and trees. At least three percent (3%) of the land area witl .in a parking area shall be landscaped. The following minimum sizes shall be required at the time of planting: Overstory Deciduous Trees Ornamental Trees Coniferous Trees Major Shrub Plantings 2-1/2 inches in diameter 1-1/2 inches in diameter 6 feet tall 5 gallons I.All trash and trash handling equipment shall be stored within the principal structure, within an attached structure accessible from within the principal structure, or totally screened from eye-level view from public streets and adjacent residential properties. If accessory structures are proposed, they shall ^ constructed of the same building material as the principal structure and be readily served through swinging doors. J.Garages, accessory structures, screen walls and exposed areas of retaining walls shall be of similar type, quality and appearance as the principal structure. K.The ground level view of all mechanical utilities shall be completely screened from contiguous properties and adjacent streets, or designed to be compatible with the architectural treatment of the urincipal structure. L.External loading and ser\ ice areas must be completely screened from the ground le\ el view from contiguous residential or commercial properties and adjacent streets, except at access points. M.The light from automobile headlights and other sources shall be screened whenever it may be directed onto adjacent residential windows. (Sections 10.46 through 10.49, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) ORONO CC 351-3 (Ordinance 67,2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89) d Proposed amended Landscaping requirements to replace 10.45 Subd. 6 (H, L L, M): Landscaping. 1. a) b) c) Landscape Plan Requirements. Landscape plans shall be required for any proposed commercial site and shall be prepared by a landscape architect or other qualified person acceptable to the 0*y, drawn to the scale of not less than 1 inch equals 50 feet and shalJ show the following: a)boundary lines of the property with accurate dimensions; locations of existing and proposed buildings, parking lots, roads and other improvements; proposed grading plan with 2-foot contour intervals; location, approximate size and common name of existing trees and shrubs; a planting schedule containing symbols, quantities, common and botanical names, size of plant materials, root condition and special planting instructions; planting details illustrating proposed locations of all new plant material; locations and details of other landscape features including berms, fences and planter boxes; details of restoration of disturbed areas including areas to be sodded and seeded; location and details of irrigation systems; and details and cross sections of all required screening. e) 0 g) h) i) 2.Minimum Landscaping Requirements. a)All open areas of a lot which are not used or improved for required parking areas, drives or storage shall be landscaped with a combination of overstory trees, understory trees, shrubs, flowers and groundcover materials. The plan for landscaping shall include ground cover, bushes, shrubbery, trees, sculpture, foundations, decorative walks or other similar site design features or materials in a quantity having a minimum value in contormance with the following table: Project Value (Including building construction. Minimum Lan site preparation, and site improvements) Below $ 1.000,000 2.0 % $1,000,000 - $2,000,000 1.7 % $2,000,001 - $3,000,000 1.4 % $3,000,001 - $4,000,000 1.15% Over $4,000,000 1.0 % ?, I ik .1 W ■fil ;,v fc- r«^ [V . I: In instances where healthy plant materials of acceptable species exist on a site prior to its development, the application of the standards in this section may be adjusted by the City to allow credit for such material, provided that such adjustment is consistent with the intent of this ordinance. A reasonable attempt shall be made to preserve as many existing trees as is practicable and to incorporate them into the site plan. All new overstory trees shall be balled and burlapped or moved from the growing site by tree spade. Deciduous trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2'/2 inches. Coniferous trees shall be a minimum of six feet in height. Ornamental trees shall have a minimum caliper of 1 Vi inches. All site areas not covered by buildings, sidewalks, parking lots, driveways, patios, or similar hardsurface materials shall be covered with sod or an equivalent ground cover approved by the city. This requirement shall not apply to site areas retained in a natural state. In order to provide for adequate maintenance of landscaped areas, an underground sprinkler system shall be provided as part of each new development, except one and two family dwellings and additions to existing structures which do not at least equal the floor area of the existing structure. A sprinkler system shall be provided for all landscaped areas except areas to be preserved in a natural state. Not more than 50 percent of the required number of trees shall be composed of one species. No required tree shall be one of the following: 1)a species of the genus U Imus (elm), except those elms bred to be immune to Dutch Elm Disease; box elder; a species of the genus Populous (poplar); or female ginko. 2) 3) 4) 3.Interior Parking Lot Landscaping. All parking lots containing over 150 stalls shall be designed to incorporate unpaved, landscaped islands in number and dimension as required by theCity. All landscape islands shall contain a minimum of 180 square feet. Islands which are f.a 4. 5. 6. necessary to promote the safe and efficient flow of traffic shall not be subject to the 'M50 stall" standard and shall be required by the city when warranted. Parking lot landscape areas, including landscape islands, shall be reasonably distributed throughout the parking lot area so as to break up expanses of paved areas. Parking lot landscape areas shall be provided with deciduous shade trees, ornamental or evergreen trees, plus ground cover, mulch and/or shrubbery as determined appropriate by the Planning Commission. Parking lot landscape trees shall be provided at the rate of one tree for each 15 surface parking spaces provided, or major fraction thereof Parking lot landscaping shall be contained in planting beds bordered by a raised concrete curb or equivalent approved by the Planning Commission, Maintenance of Landscaping. The owner, tenant and their respective agents shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping in a condition presenting a healthy, neat and orderly appearance and free from refuse and debris. Plants and ground cover which are required by an approved site or landscape plan, and which have died shall be replaced within three months of notification by the city. However, the time for compliance may be extended up to nine months by the city in order to allow for seasonal or weather conditions. Retaining Walls. Retaining walls exceeding four feet in height, and staged walls which cumulatively exceed 16 feet in height or involve more than 4 tiers, must be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect. Landscaping Performance Security* Required. When screening, landscaping or other similar improvements to property are required by this ordinance a letter of credit shall be supplied by the owner in an amount equal to at least one and one-half times the value of such screening, landscaping or other improvements. The letter of credit shall be conditioned upon reimbursement of all expenses incurred by the city for engineering, legal, contracting or other fees in connection with making or completing such improvements. The letter of credit shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building permit and shall be valid for a period of time equal to one full growing season after the date of installation of the landscaping. The city may accept some other form of security in lieu of a letter of credit in an amount and under such conditions that the city may determine to be J 1 appropriate. In tlie event that construction of the project is not completed within the time prescribed by buiiding permits and other approvals, the city may, at its option, complete the work required at the expense of the awner and the surety. The city may allow an extended period of time for completion of all landscaping if the delay is due to conditions which are reasonably beyond the control of the developer. Extensions which may not exceed nine months, may be granted due to seasonal or weather conditions. When an extension is granted, the city shall require such additional security as it deems appropriate. 7.Screening and Buffering. a)The following uses shall be screened or buffered in accordance with the requirements of this subdivision; 1.Principal buildings and structures and any building or structure accessory thereto located in the B-6 zone shall be buffered from residential lo(s located in any “R” district. 2.Off-street parking facilities containing six or more spaces shall be buffered from streets located within SO feet. 3.External loading and service areas must be completely screened from the ground level view from contiguous residential or commercial properties and adjacent streets, except at access points. 4.All trash and trash handling equipment shall be stored within the principal structure, within an attached structure accessible from within the principal structure, or totally screened from eye-level view from public streets and adjacent residential properties. If accessory structures are proposed, they shall be constructed of the same building material as the principal structure and be readily served through swinging doors. 5.The ground level view of all mechanical utilities shall be completely screened from contiguous properties and adjacent streets, or designed to be compatible with the architectural treatment of the principal strjcture. f.H -f ^ •/V ^ 6.The light from automobile headlights and other sources shall be screened whenever it may be directed onto adjacent residential windows. Required screening or buffering may be achieved with fences, walls, earth berms, hedges, or other landscape materials. All walls and fences shall be architecturally harmonious with the principal building. Earth berms shall not exceed a slope of 3:1. The screen shall be designed to employ materials which provide an effective visual barrier during all seasons. All required screening or buffering shall be located on the lot occupied by the use, building, facility or structure to be screened. No screening or buffering shall be located on any public right-of-way or within eight feet of the traveled portion of any street or highway. Screening or buffering required by this section shall be of a height needed to accomplish the goals of this section. Height of plantings required under this section shall be measured at the time of installation.” exfHirr Proposed amended Architectural requirements to replace 10.45 Subd. 6(J): I.Architectural Standards. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. It is not the intent of the City to restrict design freedom unduly when reviewing project architecture in connection with a site and building plan. However, it is in the best interest of the City to promote high standards of architectural design and compatibility with surrounding structures and neighborhoods. Architectural plans shall be prepared by an architect or other qualified persons acceptable to the Cit>* and shall show the following for all structures in the B-6 District: a) b) c) d) elevations of all sides of the building; type and color of exterior building materials; a typical floor plan; dimensions of all structures; the location of trash and recycling containers and of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment. Unadorned prestressed concrete panels, concrete block and unfinished metal shall not be permitted as exterior materials for principal and accessory buildings. This restriction shall apply to all principal structures and to all accessory buildings except those not visible from any exterior property line. The city may, at its discretion, allow architecturally enhanced block or concrete panels. Accessory buildings shall be architecturally compatible with principal structures. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment and exterior trash and recycling storage areas shall be enclosed with materials compatible with the principal structure. Low-profile, self contained mechanical units which blend in with the building architecture are exempt from the screening requirement. Underground utilities shall be provided for all new and substantially renovated structures. p 4 D> CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan Urban Commercial Land Use Urban commercial development is limited to two areas which are provided with all the necessary urban services and facilities. The major commercial center of Orono will continue to be the crossroads center of Navarre. This area will provide sufficient opportunity for neighborhood retail and service businesses, plus adequate professional offices, to serve the needs of most Orono residents. Accessory functions such as offices and owner-occupied living units or limited multi-family developments will be considered appropriate in or near the Navarre commercial area. The scale and type of retail uses in a pedestrian-firiendly environment is the most important development parameter for the Navarre commercial area. The City will encourage redevelopment of individual commercial sites in Navarre to allow for an expanded range of neighborhood services and local small business opportunities. An additional commercial area is designated along Highway 12 where the availability of transportation and utilities as well as proximity to similar commercial developments in Orono and Long Lake, make commercial use appropriate. Orono will coordinate its commercial development planning related to Highway 12 area with the City of Long Lake to ensure the Long Lake downtown area remains vital and viable, to focus retail development in a compact downtown retail area, and to prevent the extension of retail development west of Willow Drive in Orono. The retail development in the Highway 12 area will be community/neighborhood scale rather than *big box* regional scale development. The types of retail uses will be those that focus on providing services to the residents and businesses of Long Lake and Orono, while also drawing from the traffic stream that will be on current Highway 12 after the Highway 12 Reroute is open. However, the retail development is not to draw substantial traffic from l^ond Orono. The development plans for the Highway 12 area will encourage locally- owned and operated businesses that provide services to Orono and Long Lake residents. Additionally, the Highway 12 retail area will be a pedestrian- friendly area. This involves providing trails/sidewalks along the roadways providing access to the retail uses. It also involves providing public amenities that provide a sense of place and provide a gathering place for the public. The two commercial areas along Highway 12 within Orono are identified in Map 3B-7 and include the following: City of Orono Community Management Pian September_,2000 Page 3B-37 L CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan 1.Property abutting the north side of existing Highway 12 (Wayzata Boulevard) from Brown Road North to Willow Drive. This area was reviewed as part of Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 in 1989, resulting in a guide plan calling for commercial uses abutting Highway 12, with primary access to a service road connecting from Brown Road to Willow Drive, and elimination of direct access to Highway 12. The area is currently bounded on the north by existing residential development at densities ranging from 1 unit per 2 acres to 1 unit per 1.3 acres. The western half of this area has since been developed via PUD as a nursery/garden center with included leasable commercial spaces. The east half of this area includes a strip shopping center, a new 10,000 s.f. office building, and a vacant 6.5 acre parcel at the northwest quadrant of Brown Road and Highway 12. The City Council in February 1998 adopted a General Concept Plan for development along Highway 12 indicating that the Council's vision includes community scale retail development (as opposed to regional or ‘big box* scale development) focused in a more compact area in or near downtown Long Lake (closer to Brown Road than to Willow Drive, at least in the short term) for the following reasons: 1.Focuses on downtown Long l.ake remaining a strong retail area, and helps preserve owner-operated small service businesses in Long Lake which are vital to Orono and Long Lake residents. 2.Focuses on maintaining a vital downtown and "sense of place" for both Long Lake and Orono. 3. 4. A compact retail area encourages pedestrian activity. It is easier to plan, coordinate and control the development of a more compact retail area than an e.xtended retail strip. 5.Focusing development toward Brown Road could strengthen the ability to obtain desirable development on the north side of Highway 12 east of the Otten Brothers Nursery. 6.Enables better control over the amount of retail development that occurs along Highway 12. 7.Provides the opportunity to generate stable jobs in office, high tech, medical, etc. City of Orono Community Management Plan s<p((aib<r_,2000 Page 3B-38 j i CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan 2. 8.A more compact community scale retail area matches the design of new Highway 12 with no interchanges through Long Lake. 9.Limits the impact on north/south roadways (i.e. increased traffic and activity levels) as compared to the more intense “big box” retail uses. 10.Maintains a lower activity level in the area west of Willow Drive. 11.Would create less pressure for providing an access from new Highway 12 to the retail area. Accordingly, this area should be developed with a mix of conunercial uses including retail, service and office components. Access via a service road paralleling Highway 12 should still be required rather than direct access to Highway 12, since existing traffic levels along Highway 12 are expected to remain at a level which makes direct all way access difficult and dangerous. The Highway 12 re-route ("proposed Highway 12") when completed in approximately 2007 will have a significant impact on access for this area, because current Highway 12 traffic levels are expected to increase between now and 2007, then should drop dramatically when the Bypass opens. However, traffic levels on "old Highway 12" after 2007 are expected to again creep upward, and the long-term need for a service road may again manifest itself. For this reason, it is in the best interests of the City and the business community to preserve at least a partial service road corridor between Brown Road and Willow for future use, that will provide all properties with access options other than direct access from Highway 12. The City supports the development of a "mid-point" connection to Highway 12 directly across from Brimhall Avenue, such access to be at least a right-in, right-out configuration. Further, if and when the service road is constructed, all other existing accesses directly to Highway 12 should ultimately be removed. Property abutting the north side of existing Highway 12 from Willow Drive to Old Crystal Bay Road. This area (shown on Map 3B-7 as the ‘commercial’ portion of Parcel Group 1) currently is vacant property, comprised of 3 tax parcels with some 2600 feet of Highway 12 frontage. As part of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan amendment, the City guided the portion of this area directly adjacent City of Orono Community Management Pian September_, 2000 Page 3B-39 CMP Part 3B. Land Use Plan to the north side of Highway 12 for commercial development. At that time, the City was not clear about the type of commercial development that should be planned for this area. Through joint discussions with the City of Long Lake regarding development along Highway 12, the City has determined that the optimum development in this area would be office development. Office development can provide services for Orono residents, can provide facilities for businesses owned by Orono residents, and can provide quality employment opportunities. The development of this area for office use versus retail use enables the Highway 12 retail area to remain a more compact pedestrian-friendly retail area versus a non-cohesive extended strip of retail development. Access to all office uses will be via a service road connecting Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road, with no direct access points onto Highway 12. Development of this service road began in 1991 with the extension of Kelley Parkway eastward from Old Crystal Bay Road. The City’s intent is to have a single tier of office uses between Kelley Parkway and Highway 12, with primarily residential uses north of the service road. Due to construction of a stormwater retention pond by MnDOT midway between Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow, and the City's intent to develop the area north of the service road residentially at a density of 2-6 units per acre, the opportunities for large office sites are limited. As many as six 2-2.5 acre office sites can be developed along the Highway 12 frontage while still allowing the intend^ residential development to occur. This area is guided for office use with minor retail and service uses allowed only as accessory uses to the office use. “Big box" retail uses will not be allowed within this area. City or Orono Community Management Plan September_^ 2000 Page 3B-40 1 Cem ^ CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in Ac Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, November 20,2000 beginning at 8:00 p.m. to consider application #2638 to consider an amendment to Municipal Code Section 10.45 to establish standards for landscaping and architectural design. All persons wishing to be heard shall be present. Written comments are due by November 15,2000. The plans may be reviewed at City offices by appointment. Fur further information call City Hall at 249-4600. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Paul Weinberger Zoning Administrator To be published Ae weeks of November 4,2000 and November 11,2000, Posted at:Orono City Offices Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office •1 rV, ■ Ik To:Chair Hawn and Planning Commission Members Ron Moqrse, City Administrator From: Date: Mike Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator^^^!3 November 15,2000 Subject:#2639 Proposed Zoning Code Amendment: Add “RPUD” to List of Available Zoning Districts under Section 10.52 List of Exhibits A - Zoning Code Section 10.52 B - Map from CMP Amendment #2, May 23,1988 Background In 1988 the Citv* studied the Highway 12 corridor and made specific Comprehensive Plan (CMP) changes for certain groupings of properties along Highway 12. Those changes cany through to the 2000-2020 CMP, and allow for hiture development of conunercial or medium density residential uses on those properties. The Highway 12 Corridor properties subject to those changes are along the north side of 12 between Brown Road and Old Crystal Bay Road and are defined in CMP Amendment #2 adopted May 23,1988. Subsequently, the City in 1989 adopted Section 10.52 “Special Requirements for Rezoning in the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area”, which sets out criteria, standards and requirements which must be satisfied before rezoning of any of affected properties will be approved. Section 10.52, Subd. 5 establishes a short list of zoning districts to which the Corridor properties can be rezoned, as follows: Subd. 5. Available Zoning Districts. Due to the unique set of constraints and opportunities that affect future decisions regarding development within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area, applicants for rezoning are strongly encouraged to utilize the planned unit development approach, outlined in Section 10 of the Orono Zoning Ordinance. However, applications will be accepted for rezoning requests for any of the following e.xisting zoning districts within the City, consistent with a finding of consistency with the Highway 12 Corridor Study and subject to compliance with all of the additional requirements established in this section: B-6 PRD R-IA R-IB M-6 Highway Commercial District Planned Residential Development One Family Residential District One Family Residential District Multiple Family Planned Residential District Any proposal which requires a modification to zoning or subdivision requirements must be done as a Planned Unit Development. #2639 November 15,2000 ^ Page 2 The proposed amendment is to merely add RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development to the list of zoning districts available for the Highway 12 corridor properties. This amendment is consistent with the 2000-2020 CMP which guides certain properties between Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road for medium density residential uses, which would be more appropriately developed through the RPUD process than via the old PRD which has few procedural or performance standards. In the future we may conclude that the PRD Planned Residential Development option should be dropped from the list in favor of RPUD; but staff has not yet fully assessed the ramifications of that, so we suggest leaving PRD in for now. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission should recommend approval of the proposed revision of Section 10.52, Subd. 5 to add “RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development” to the list of zoning districts to which properties in the defined Highway 12 Corridor can be rezoned. •• h §10.52 SEC. 10.52 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REZONING IN THE HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY AREA. Subd. 1 . Minimum Area. To insure consistency with the goals and objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study, applications for rezoning within the study area must include a minimum of five acres. The plans submitted along with these applications must also include enough information regarding the effect of the proposed development on surrounding parcels to insure that the property can be developed in a manner that is both compatible with adjacent properties and consistent with the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Subd. 2. Access and Circulation Plan. The plans submitted along with the application must propose access to the proposed development which is consistent with the Transportation Planning Objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study. All public easements and road right of way that is needed to allow the construction of service roads and/or the expansion of Trunk Highway 12 past the subject property, shall be dedicated to the City. Source: Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 Subd. 3. Sanitary Sewer and Municipal Water Availability. The available sanitary sewer and municipal water capacity to serve the development of this corridor is currently very limited. Therefore, any plans to develop within this area must either demonstrate that it can occur utilizing current sewer and water allocations or they must include improvements to increase the capacity of the systems serving this area. If sanitary sewer or municipal water system improvements are proposed as part of the application, then the feasibility of providing this service will also be scrutinized along with an improvement financing plan to insure that the costs associated with providing this additional capacity will be paid for by the development. Source: Ordinance 78,2nd Series Adopted: 1-22-90 Subd. 4. Storm Water Management. Site Drainage plans must be submitted to insure consistency with the Storm Water Management objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Plans will be carefully reviewed to insure both that proposed storm water ponding areas contain sufficient storage capacity and whatever additional measures are necessary to guarantee that the quality of nmoff from the site, meets or exceeds the City's standards. Subd. 5. Available Zoning Districts. Due to the unique set of constraints and opportunities that affect future decisions regarding development within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area, applicants for rezoning are strongly encouraged to utilize the planned unit development ORONO CC 359 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) r §10.52 approach, outlined in Section 10 of the Orono Zoning Ordinance. However, applications will be accepted for rezoning requests for any of the following existing zoning districts within the City, consistent with a finding of consistency with the Highway 12 Corridor Study and subject to compliance with all of the additional requirements established in this section: B-6 Highway Commercial District PRD Planned Residential Development R-IA One Family Residential District R-1 B One Family Residential District M-6 Multiple Family Planned Residential District Any proposal which requires a modification to zoning or subdivision requirements must be done as a Planned Unit Development. Subd. 6. Building Design and Construction. In addition to other restrictions of this Chapter, the use, construction, alteration or enlargements to any building or structure within the district shall meet the following standards: A.All extetior wall finishes on any building shall be: (a)Face brick, or (b)Natural stone, or (c)Specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative materials or texture, or (d)Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials be of any of those noted in items a, b and c above, or glass. (e)Other materials as may be approved by the Council. Combinations of such materials shall be permitted. B.All subsequent additions and outbuildings constructed after the erection of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming with the original architectural design and general appearance. C.No building or structure of a temporaiy character, trailer, basement, tent or shack shall be constructed, placed or maintained upon the property except as accessory to and during the construction of permanent buildings. Subd. 7. Requirement of Development Agreement. All development permits authorized within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area shall be subject to the execution of a ORONO CC 359-1 Ordinance 67,2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 §10.52 development agreement?Said development agreement shall clearly identify the timing of all of the public improvements associated with the development and the developers’ financial commitments related to these improvements. The agreement shall also include any and all other conditions of approval deemed necessary to insure compliance with the Special Minimum Requirements for Rezoning the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area, as well as the goals and objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Source; Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 SEC. 10.53.PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Subd. 1 . Authorization: Planned unit development authorization may allow: A.Variety: Within a comprehensive site design concept a mixture of land uses, housing types and densities. B.Sensitivity: Through the departure from the strict application of required setbacks, yard areas, lot sizes, minimum house sizes, minimum requirements, and other performance standards associated with conventiomi zoning, planned unit dt/elopment can maximize the development potential of land while remaining sens/ive to its unique and valuable natural characteristics. C.Efficiency: The consolidation of areas for recreation and reductions in street lengths and other utility related expenses. D.Density Transfer: The project density may be clustered, basing density on number of units per acre versus specific lot dimensions. E.District Integration: The combination of uses which are allowed in separate zoning districts such as: 1 .Mixed residential allows both densities and unit types to be varied within the project. 2.Mixed residential with increased density acknowledging the greater sensitivity of PUD projects, regulation provides increased density on the property if a PUD is utilized. 3.Mixed land uses with the integration of compatible land uses within the project. F.Applicability; Utilization of this zoning district is limited to the Highway 12 Corridor as set forth in the City of Orono's Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2 adopted May 23, 1988. ORONO CC 359-2 Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 PI 01 Cliv Ol CMf Ol I / / iSlMliil® Iliil.«■« ^pttttttfin ^^-:i'S=i^n.;’. Mapla Plain-Long Lake Interceptor — Medht-OronoH^ Lake Interceptor — Water Main —P-- New Roads IIPHI ( Current MUSA T etee< Proposed Extension of MUSA City of Orono HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDQR STUDY Western Portion Summary of Recommended Changes Fig. 340 4 4 EX) Completion Date: 10/30/00 Application Deadiine: 12^9/00 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:November 16,2000 SUBJECT:Orono Amber, LLC. 2060 Wayzata Boulevard #2640 Preliminary Subdivision/CUP-Rezoning/Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2641 Site Plan Reviews Public Hearing Existing Zoning: Lot Area: B-1, Retail Sales Business District +6.7 acres List of Exhibits A B C D E F G H I Plat Map Site Plan/Preliminary Lot Layout Office Building Views Senior Housing Building Views A2.1 Second Level Building Plan A2.2 Third Level Building Plan A2.3 Typical Building Plan A4.1 Unit Floor Plans A4.2 Unit Floor Plans J K L M N O P Q Ll Office Building Landscaping Ll-1 Senior Building Landscaping Section 10.52 Hwy 12 Rezoning Section 10.53 Hwy 12 PUD Ordinance Proposed RPRD Landscaping Req. Traffic Consult. Review I (11/7/00) Traffic Consult. Review II (11/14/00) Property Owner Notification List Application Summary Orono Amber, LLC. has submitted an application for a two lot plat of a 6.7 acre property. Proposed is a rezoning for the two properties from B-1, Retail Sales Business District to B-6^UD (for office use of the proposed west parcel) and RPUD /PUD (for multi-family residential use of the proposed east parcel). The intended use of the properties are a 3 story 70 unit senior housing project and a 23,000 s.f office building. The proposed residential use of the property would require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment as the property is not guided for residential use in the 1980 Plan or the proposed Comprehensive Plan (CMP). The City has a Highway 12 PUD procedure and a Highway 12 rezoning procedure established that provide the process the review requires. Section 10.53 is the Code section that defines the standards and review process for a Highway 12 PUD and Section 10.52 defines the special requirements for rezoning along the Highway 12 corridor and study area. Those Code sections have been attached as exhibits to this report. Orono Amber, LLC. 2060 Wa>zata Boulevard «264CV«2641 Page I ► I. The applicant has provided site plans for both properties. A commercial site plan review for the office and senior housingj)roperties and buildings will include a full review of the following items; 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) Landscaping Traffic Flow/Road System Parking Arrangement Building Height/Setbacks Review of Architectural Materials/Building Design Lighting Screening Other I.Preliminary Subdivision/Rezoning/Comprehensive Plan Amendment Uses within the PUD may include only those uses designated by the official Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The 1989 Comprehensive Plan Amendment had guided the property for commercial use. The Comprehensive Plan (CMP) as preliminarily approved by the City Council in September designated several Orono properties as areas that would allow medium density. The density proposed in the CMP does not have an existing zoning district that would allow the types of housing that would be offered by as proposed in this application. The proposed CMP did not include this property as a residential site. In fact it has been guided for commercial use as was the case with 1989 CMP amendment. The entire property has been zoned B-1 since at least 1967, perhaps earlier. To rezone the east property would require changing the land use designation to residential. The 70 unit building on the 4 acre site would provide 17.5 units/acre of senior housing units at a variety of unit sizes and rental rates. The proposed RPUD zoning district would be the appropriate zoning district to provide the units/acre density requested. Section 10.33, Subdivision 5(E) in the proposed RPUD district would allow the City of Orono to provide incentives to encourage projects which are consistent with housing goals. “Incentives may include modification of density and floor area ratio requirements for developments providing lifecycle housing and low and moderate cost housing.” The City has the ability to ensure the housing need, for lifecycle housing, is met. The RPUD district would rely heavily on the CMP designation for housing density and the ability of the developer to meet the housing needs of the community. The office use would not require a CMP amendment as the underlying land use designation is for commercial use. The property is proposed as a 2.7 acre site. The use of the property as office/clinic would be permitted under the B-6 district should the Council approve an amendment to the permitted uses in the B-6 district to permit clinic uses. Platting Process This review is at the preliminary plat stage. A complete review of the preliminary plat will require review and approval of the proposed site plans. The plat would result in two lots. Lot 1 (west property) = 116,832 s.f. or + 2.7 acres Lot 2 (east property) = 173,871 s.f or + 4.0 acres Orono Amber. LLC. 2060 Wavzau Boulevard i2640/ii2641 Page 2 i f The preliminary plat review falls under the standard platting procedures as established in the Subdivision Ordinance. Additional requirements may be imposed by the City on non-residential subdivisions to protect adjacent residential areas from potential nuisance from a proposed commercial/office development including for provisions for a permanently landscaped buffer strip if necessary. Additional special requirements may be imposed to protect the residential areas surrounding the development. The developer has proposed to plat the senior housing project as condominiums. Each unit would have a separate legal description and tax statement. Under this type of plat the units would be owned by a non-profit agency and rented to the occupants under the agreements established for the building. Surrounding Land Use The subject parcel was platted as Outlot F, Sugarwoods the parcel immediately south of the Sugarwoods neighborhood. The only buffer between the residential use in Sugarwoods is a 40' wide platted outlot that is owned by the Sugarwoods homeowners association. Restrictions were placed on each lot within the Sugarwoods neighborhood that prohibits removal of trees greater than 2" in diameter within the rear setback for those lots located closest to the proposed development. The property is located on Highway 12 and the City of Long Lake is located south of Highway 12. Two lots that are located west of the project are developed as the Orono Shopping Center and Conoco gas station. U.S. Highway 12 is proposed to be relocated to the south and the existing Highway 12 will be turned over to Hennepin County. Part of the proposed Highway 12 relocation includes a change to the existing 12 and Brown Road intersection. Currently, BrowTi Road North ends in a T intersection with 12. The Brown Road south of 12 will be realigned to create an intersection with existing 12 directly across from Brown Road North and a signal light would be installed at that intersection. The property east of Brown Road is the Long Lake State Bank site, in the City of Long Lake. lA. Financial Considerations Briefly, applicant has requested the Council consider various methods of financial assistance to make this project feasible. Such methods include the creation of a TIF district or similar provisions or reimbursements. Council has had early discussions regarding this and has indicated it is willing to consider this. The City’s financial consultant is also rc''icwing the request. II.Site Plan Review (Lot 1 - Office Building) The proposed office building is two stories with approximately 23,000 s.f. of gross floor space. Under the building is a 21 stall underground parking area. The actual building size is 172* X 80' or 13,760 s.f. The building is designed to step down from a two story structure to one story immediately adjacent to the Sugarwoods neighborhood. The building would be constructed to only expose the 80' width to the neighborhood. Orono Amber, LLC. 2060 Wa>ziu Boulevard »2640/«264l Paged A. .f? L Site Characteristics.B-6 Conformity (Note: Needed variances are shown in bold type) Required/Allowed Existing/Proposed Site area:2 acres 2.7 acres Deflned lot width:100'195 ’ Parking setbacks: Required front yard:15'15 ’ Required rear yard:10 ’35 ’ Required side yard adj. to "R" district:10 ’125 ’ Required side yard adj. to "B" district:5'15 ’ Building setbacks: Front lot line:30 ’190 ’ Rear lot line:35 ’35 ’ Side lot line adj. to "R” district:35*30 ’ Side lot line adj. to *'B" district:10 ’83’ Building Height:30' (2 % stories)30 ’ and 32 decorative tower to the left of the side entrance No. of Parking Stalls: Required = 1 per 200 s.f. Required = 1 per 200 s.f. of “net usable floor area for office/medical use’ (Net = 20,880 s.f.± /200 = 105 stalls required) Total stalls required = 105 Total stalls proposed = 105 Signage Allowance 190 s.f.Not known Additional Standards required by the current B>6 zoning district (Section 10.45): A.At least twenty flve percent (25%) of the land area shall be landscaped with grass, approved ground cover, shrubbery and trees. At least three percent (3%) of the land area within a parking area shall be landscaped. B All trash and trash handling equipment shall be stored within the principal structure, within an attached structure accessible flom within the principal structure, or totally screened from eye-level view from public streets and adjacent residential properties. If accessory structures are proposed, they shall be constructed of the same building material as the principal structure and be readily served through swinging doors. Orono Amber. LLC. 2060 Wayzau Boulevard i264(VI»2641 Paged c.Garages, accessory structures, screen walls and exposed areas of retaining walls shall be of similar type, quality and appearance as the principal structure. The ground level view of all mechanical utilities shall be completely screened from contiguous properties and adjacent streets, or designed to be compatible with the architectural treatment of the principal structure. E.External loading and service areas must be completely screened from the ground level view from contiguous residential or commercial properties and adjacent streets, except at access points. F.The light from automobile headlights and other sources shall be screened whenever it may be directed onto adjacent residential windows. *Note that the proposed B-6 landscaping/screening and architectural standards (application #2638) will be much more detailed than the current standsard. The proposed standards have been forwarded to the developers landscape architect for this project. III.Site Plan Review (Lot 2 - Senior Housing) The senior housing building is designed with the same concept of stepping down to decrease the mass of the ends of the building from 3 stories to 2 stories. The building is designed to have 3 levels and a level of underground parking for 83 cars. One significant design element of the building is the clock tower, designed to break up the roof line of the building. The building is designed to have the east '/j of the entire structure located 10 ’ lower than the west 1/2 due to the existing topography. A MnDot stormwater pond is located at the northwest comer of Highway 12 and Brown Road. The pond is owned and maintained by MnDot. Developer has indicated this pond has existing designed capacity to serve both proposed stmctures as well as other existing/future development in the area. Site Characteristics. Conformity with the proposed RPUD zoning district standards (Note: Needed variances are shown in bold type) Required/Allowed Existing/Proposed •• Site area:5 acres 4 acres ♦The RPUD district allows the Council flexibility to this standard when findings arc made as listed in proposed Section 10.33, Subdivision 5 (A). Required front yard:20’45-50 ’ Required rear yard:20’NA Required side yard 20’60’ Orono Amber, LLC. 2060 Wayxau Boulevard «2640/«264l Pages * Building setbacks: The setback for buildings from exterior RPUD lot lines would be 35' except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the building. One concern is the building location being proposed at 41’ to the rear lot line. The developer will provide a new site plan at the Planning Commission meeting that would indicate a greater setback to the rear property line. The property is very limited by the MnDot pond for developing the housing further from the property line. One non-desirable option to allow the building to be located even further from the rear lot line would be to located the access to north of the building. This may not be the best option as a building would be a better “neighbor ” to the residential properties to the north than a service road providing access to the buildings and a clinic. Building Height: The intent of the RPUD district is to provide housing to meet lifecycle, and affordable and moderate cost housing needs. As discussed with the review of the RPUD ordinance, the housing types may require buildings to exceed the 30' standard that applies to single family residential homes and office buildings. The only district that could allow a building greater than 30' is the Industrial district which all 3 stories or 40'. The proposed building would have a peak height of close to SO' as viewed from the back side of the structure. Staffs determination of the defined height of the building averages 38'. Strict interpretation of the ordinance would define the height at 45', lowest grade adjoining building to highest midpoint of the roof. Because the RPUD ordinance has not been adopted, no standard exists for building height in the district. The developer has stated to allow the project to work the building would have to be three stories or moderately priced senior rental units would not be feasible. No. of Parking Stalls: Required = 2 per dwelling unit (Section 10.61) Required => 140 spaces Total stalls proposed = 83 interior spaces 70 exterior spaces Section 10.30 establishes required parking for the M-6, Multiple Family Zoning District as 2 spaces per unit plus .25 spaces for each unit as additional parking areas for guests. A minimum of one space per unit shall be provided on the interior of the building. While this proposal is not subject to the M-6 standards, these standards provide a guideline for parking for a standard apartment buildine. The standards for a building designed for senior housing use may not require the same parking standards. The applicants have stated they do not feel all the parking proposed on site will be necessary for the use. They will be providing additional information as to parking needs for other similar projects to justify the amount of spaces provided. IV.Road/Parking/Access The property would have two access points. One on Brown Road North to serve the entire development and provide access to a future signal light at the intersection of Highway 12 and Brown Road. A second access point for the properties would be to Highway 12 for right in/right out turns. The City of Orono’s traffic consultant has reviewed the plan and has determined the development Orono Amber, LLC. 2060 Wayzau Boulevard «2640i^2641 Page 6 would expect to generate approximately 500 vehicles trips per day (250 in 250 out). Both reports dated 11/7/00 and 11/14/00 have been attached for your review. A primary concern addressed by our consultant is the proposed interior road would be used for the clinic traffic as well as the residential use. The individual parking spaces in the lots located in front of the senior housing building would back out directly into through traffic. They have recommended a separate primary parking area be designed to not allow’ two sided parking to have to back out into the through traffic. When the original planning for the site was completed in 1988 it was envisioned that »service road would pass through this property to the Orono Mall property, Otten Bros, and correct to Willow Drive. The plan was completed many years prior to the final route of the Highway 12 relocation. A full service road may not be required since Highway 12 will be relocated and the intersection with Brown Road and 12 will be realigned and lighted in the future. However, the traffic consultant believes that many motorists would seek this service road route as an alternative to the other direct access drives to Highway 12 increasing the amount of "cut thru" dramatically. V.Grading and Drainage The proposed grading plan shows the parking lot in the northwest comer of the site approximately 10' higher than the adjoining property to the south. The Cit>' Engineer is recommending this part of the site be lowered at least 4'. The retaining wall could then be eliminated. Additional engineering is required for further review of the proposal. The developer should provide storm sewer and ponding calculations for review. VI.Landscaping Plans/Pedestrian Ways Proposed standards for landscaping are attached as Exhibits J and K. The applicants have provided landscaping plans for each property under review. The plans have placed an emphasis on heavier planting between the buildings/parking areas and the residential use to the north. The Code requires a screen not less than 50% opaque be located between commercial uses and residential uses. The RPUD ordinance has proposed a landscaping value to be required based on a percentage of the . project value. For a development greater than $4,000,000 the minimum landscaping value that must be provided would equal 1% of the project value. Wally Case, the City’s landscaping consultant, would complete an estimate of the landscaping value based on the proposed ordinance. Some of the existing trees would be removed to make room for the project. The plans submitted have been designed to protect several mature trees that are located between the proposed building and Highway 12. Protection of those trees requires the building and access road to be shifted to the north. An adjacent property owner to the north has expressed concerns about the location of the building being 40' from the rear property line. The Planning Commission should consider the option of shifting the building forward 20' to allow a 60' setback between the rear propert>‘ line and the senior housing building. Shifting the building forward would likely require removal of the trees Orono Amber. LLC. 2060 Wtyzau Boulevard «:640'«264l Pa«e7 located between Highway 12 and the pond. If the trees are removed, it would make the building more visible to the future 12 and Brown Road intersection. This may be a more desired option as the building would be m^oved further from the adjacent residential properties. A suitable landscape plan would soften the impact of the building as viewed from the Brown/12 intersection, and perhaps enhance the urban feel of this area. The developer is preparing an alternative site plan that will show a road without two-sided parking and relocating the senior housing building 60' from the north property line. They will present that option to the Planning Commission on Monday night. Pedestrian paths should be made available between parking areas and all entrances to the buildings. It would be appropriate to provide for a pedestrian access between the senior building and the clinic, and the existing sidewalks abutting Hwy 12. The Planning Commission should review and discuss each of the 6 items as presented in the report and any other issues the Planning Commission deems appropriate. 1.Preliminary Subdivision/Rezoning/CMP Amendment 2.Site Plan Review - Office Building Property 3.Site Plan Review - Senior Housing Property 4.Roads/Parking/Access (use of interior street as a future frontage road connecting Brown Road to Willow Drive) 5.Grading 6.Landscaping 7.Other Issues Options for Action Planning Commission is advised that, per the Highway 12 PUD provisions of 10.53, this proposal is at the General Concept Stage, equivalent to the preliminary plat stage of a subdivision. However, the Council may hold a second public hearing after the Planning Conunission recommendation. Council approval of the concept plan requires a 4/5 vote. Section 10.53, Subdivision (A) (2) (f) requires the Council to proceed with the approval process if the Planning Commission does not make a recommendation within 60 days of receipt of the application. The application was received complete as of 10/30/00. UTiile the lack of a Planning Commission meeting in December is a legitimate reason to extend past the 60 day limit, the developer would prefer to have conceptual approval this year, rather than be tabled until the Januaiy meeting. As an option to tabling. Planning Commission may wish to identify for Council the major concerns with this proposal, and give Council a sense of the pro and cons of each issue. A.To recommend approval of the application with direction on each of the 7 issues listed above. B.Table, stating additional requirements or information requested. C.Deny, stating reasons. D.Other Action Orono Amber. LLC. 2060 Wa> zata Boulevard #2640/1^2641 Page 8 f.34-/!^-^^h 1 4 u. 4‘ -> * A..,.•'••• /V \ *’ ; r*-. W ^ '<■ : >—• N >• • • \ *. *.«• *.vv: i J If -· • J . I! ,. -·.I..-.... i�.,_....,. ___ --4' .. ·:·--.........: • I ....... ·-I I ...-1 ,! II ,. --... _ ,--=--,�-�. ·----·111oe-1 ---. -- > -�-- $ �-- -__ ...--.. __ .... I It I If If 111111t1111 Uil I� I li1 i I,, ,,,11 1111:1"'�!1 I , I I I I I •I I It ·i� .. I I I I 'i· I I I ... I II I I I I I I I I I I I � I 4 �I i ) I f' I I I I I I I I I I I I ' .. I I «4 I I Li- I f I fi* ili til !1 ft ninm < > Hoz 0) 0)moH oz tit /•I 5 r O t0 U) < 0- r 2< m — — - III III 9 P< III 1 III 3D 3D 1*1 1 3 9 M 3 3 0 l_.3D a in •f \ pjlELLI/ \ r-•) HI I 111 S I 9 0 IIIr III h 0 :io oi hi I :^l I 'll—wnm ■F 31 cm m n cm m n cm n "1 M M m H dll 31 on mTO SDIQ) m ng IBI 1B9 L.y. ||■M iI bu iI llllllllllll [ia P"]z;j liiiB ]B oa 1 n no 1 I )'■ l*'i| t::K» li::i 31 3D no n k .* rTTM > , ■ 'V. 'I 5 «;;tllii I • , • • r ·r t I -- I I ,' ,.a � \n r' • ,, Ill Ill ' I • .,-. ( _,) Ill Ill I. 9. 0 re 0 -m77 = r-- 0:) ·<··'._,I •. . )> u) i .; ii � (;, . ·" (9 . ·rI ii 11i ,I . Iii (0 E) 7 0 . . -� -� ... m� ImmlJ"' fil ;;t %.. �i�� 1���� I I : I I !'I• j Ill 111 I I () / (�� Ill I • I II I • 9 -�,) ,-, -! I ,i Q j • • • ., ·r·! P.•I�"f 1 ·1' I I ' . I I • �i,'� ! : ;i ..,., I • I I � I -- I I I I I I 9 A -..... Ill r Ill ' I Ill I 0 .. . . ..-. -· .. I II 0 -4 > 177 -·.. .. -II I I i ' I ! . I I • I I I I (\7 . . • )> I\)• ;1 !i i i i �i • --. -·-0 • • '. Q 0----· m� m m ::u ('I) G> -f :ci2�i:;; 0 � ::r, f § I I • ' I .. .. .. i I Ir \ I i I g§ I I I t,, .... � '1 I ' .. )> I\) • I\) ii �i ·r I I I m� Imm a i �en ffl ;;I :t I -}Ji�� !ma>J: o�i� r· ' I I I !I I I --. I I g :Z:fRi g§ ,�§ ,,, -t > I I I :PLAN • . • --- '"'' G ORONO SENOR HOU S ING ORONO MNESOT A 0.... � . � ...- ,- CIGIIM•IIOt 'lie MILLER HANSON WESTERBECK BERGER, INC MICN l'ECII a:n.AJ ... I ···- 120IHA� IIIIOT �l'IAXNm-MS .... TYPICAL ·Bl.a.DING PLAN ·A2·· 3 -, , . , . 1 I.J · I '' ' ' . ,.'. ' . -t o« cz H m ro•OD 33 Om »._ -J / h •1 n'iV 9 ..... - L o ■' ^ 5 L -* V.I ' L 1 ___________r ^ 1 o . /'V/f J y •••i: ir •2P#-\___Trnr\_ :c� �-. '= ·•· L.t�� ,•..r. ".,. -=-:c� .... tt"•J• ' -. . ., ., • ,.r :..i--,,.,,o111tCClr" ....... Q.J· ft HOUSNG OAONO :SOTA .... � -�� •. hr1':I 1 � �'\ '17 �E n f! <�� lilt ·i .. � Y•O" • a •J• V r-"I..,.. 1 VI 1 • J _ 1 1 1 1: , 1r , : 11 , ct 1 ·. , _1 , . j .. ,. ' ..... ' ! I "---,,!",. I > ' - ---(II ,, II I I . �Ii \ rr-,--J ,_ (1-BR> : ! LJ it:,o,-: ·, ,,,,,.... - : (2�BR> ii""--,. ' �•,"A-=e,-=-• IC •O' <-"'::.-.. ., •••• ;c eL-.CO-:· 0"•0' ■ 11 _,. ,.• I-----ti 2 ,i t. UNIT B <2-BR/DEN> 114• • 1-� m::-.-oa: ., ·" • �r-•· , l •i!i �--, .. -- � ...... •-2· ;' r i:l '--'--" J..:i_, ": -.,c,,,. ...... � .,. �-----------...:__ , ----..__._, 4 ,lNT D' C2-BR> · t1.•'!. -,-0, a.A"'\. l 0 \ . �--1; - • - I..... -. I I 1 I � COIII,•- .. MILLER HANSON WESTERBECK BERGER, INC .MCHl'IS:ll 4' l'Ufl 1• Cl 1101 HAWTMOII■ A,,...__.,.""' ....... .-.�• -,AX n a, 10ft '1/C-lNT PLANS A4 .. 1 .' I I I I· I ' i . I I I • - • • I I ' m Ill "" m ,---- -- I I )> � • I\) __ .,�-' ........... . --- f I m� lJCI) Imm �-f:J: .;vi§� m r- . .. . -- .. ;a l -.... -.. -I qm I mJJ m z I !! i .. I ' ' I I I I I I I I ---=======-"'II I I I I i i ti I• � 0 1·(,' !! Ii i a,O �0 -4> ' f I • I I .. CJI ... DI "' -N N VJ ,r "O z �0 0 ""' 0 -.,s· -3 ; Q n • 7 0 • C ., r-"O • l !§ 5·I :, •Q •• » �-t �- C 3 .ft • Q 1J ,, >�5· ., " 3.C e � ,. i. • 5· I 2 C: Q ""' •a • ... I ,, 2 r a· � 3 n �:, Q � z· 3• 0 � -I ., -:, 0 s :, .. i, & "· n l 0 ,.; n. ,. ... 3 '# � • � . 0 • � � f-,1 f-,1 '"' UI CJI �I • CD • �I I I n .. n n CD Q. Q -- ... -N - n CD 0 ii tO n 0 ,r , '< % Sl i • 1 g' -2 � n• :, a· ' � 'II,,. t· Il• l a ;· d 0 1 g •.•,n .,_ t•• n 0 a• -. Ut �I � CD .. m ... IA > 3 C ., p 3 'O C l• >" � r Q. Q � CD CD 0r.q. •.-"" n 1 3 � z Q 3• X' §' �z 1 .. �H • 'O �.. 2 Pl C,-·� en 0 Q. ORONO OFFICE BUILDING ... ----- I j ►►►�►►►►C.1111111111 ,, ' ' I L41• I r--...... KT8Aeic-----� ' ,-t.I.t-----------30' 91.DINO• _________ J-I • I -ca I 4 I I - I I � - I • I BRQWN BPAP NORTH i I I�, I I ' !)Ii !I ttl I' I I 'I 11 1111 I ,,:, 1!• I I , •• II� �1i I ,11 •·1••• !11 !x C , .. • - I - ' I I 'I I I I I ' I I I I 'cl I I i I I I I I I I I I ' I I ' 'I I 'I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' f I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I f I f I ·...-.--._ I I I r I 1 . I I ! -00�@e00 •e ''I' I i:11.1 � IG .. ' I I " .. .. " . , ;I I I J fI r I f" II i I' 0 .e •• ae o• liit; 1�� :s -I r I J I I • I I \ I I ' f ; J I IJI r 17'- I SEC. 10.52 §10.52 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REZONING IN THE HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY AREA. Subd. 1. Minimum Area. To insure consistency with the goals and objectives of the Highway 12 Coiridor Study, applications for rezoning uithin the study area must include a minimum of five acres. The plans submitted along with these applications must also include enough information regarding the effect of the proposed development on surrounding parcels to insure that the property can be developed in a manner that is both compatible with adjacent properties and consistent with the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Subd. 2. Access and Circulation Plan. The plans submitted along with tlie application must propose access to the proposed development which is consistent with the Transportation Planning Objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Ail public easements and road right of way that is needed to allow the construction of service roads and/or the expansion of Trunk Highway 12 past the subject property, shall be dedicated to the City. Source: Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 Subd. 3. Sanitary Sewer and Municipal Water Availability. The available sanitary sewer and municipal water capacity to serve the development of this corridor is currently very limited. Therefore, any plans to develop within this area must either demonstrate that it can occur utilizing current sewer and water allocations or they must include improvements to increase the capacity of the systems serving this area. If sanitary sewer or municipal water system improvements are proposed as part of the application, then the feasibility of providing this service will also be scrutinized along with an improvement financing plan to insure that the costs associated with providing this additional capacity will be paid for by the development. Source: Ordinance 78, 2nd Series Adopted: 1-22-90 Subd. 4. Storm Water Management. Site Drainage plans must be submitted to insure consistency with the Storm Water Management objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Plans will be carefully reviewed to insure both that proposed storm water ponding areas contain sufficient storage capacity and whatever additional measures are necessary to guarantee that the quality of runoff from the site, meets or exceeds the City's standards. Subd. 5. Available Zoning Districts. Due to the unique set of constraints and opportunities that affect future decisions regarding development within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area, applicants for rezoning are strongly encouraged to utilize the planned unit development ORONO CC 359 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) §10.52 approach, outlined in Section 10 of the Orono Zoning Ordinance. However, applications will be accepted for rezoning requests for any of the following existing zoning districts within the City , consistent with a finding of consistency with the High'vay 12 Corridor Study and subject to compliance with all of the additional requirements established in this section: B-6 Highway Commercial District PRD Planned Residential Development R-1 A One Family Residential District R-1 B One Family Residential District M-6 Multiple Family Planned Residential District Any proposal which requires a modification to zoning or subdivision requirements must be done as a Planned Unit Development. Subd. 6. Building Design and Construction. In addition to other restriction of this Chapter, the use, construction, alteration or enlargements to any building or structure within the district shall meet the following standards: A.All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be: (a)Face brick, or (b)Natural stone, or (c)Specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated vrith an applied decorative materials or texture, or (d)Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials be of any of those noted in items a, b and c above, or glass. (e)Other materials as may be approved by the Council. Combinations of such materials shall be permitted. V B.All subsequent additions and outbuildings constructed after the erwtion of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming with the original architectural design and general appearance. C.No building or structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent or shack shall be constructed, placed or maintained upon the property except as accessory to and during the construction of permanent buildings. Subd. 7. Requirement of Development Agreement. All development permits authorized within the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area shall be subject to the execution of a ORONO CC 359-1 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) §10.52 development agreement. Said development agreement shall clearly identify the timing of all of the public improvements associated with the development and the developers' financial commitments related to these improvements. The agreement shall '-.iio include any and all other conditions of approval deemed necessary to insure compliance wiih che Special Minimum Requirements for Rezoning the Highway 12 Corridor Study Area, as well as the goals and objectives of the Highway 12 Corridor Study. Source: Ordinance 67, 2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 SEC. 10.53.PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Subd. 1. Authorization. Planned unit development authorization may allow: A.Variety: Within a comprehensive site design concept a mixture of land uses, housing types and densities. B.Sensitivity: Through the departure from the strict application of required setbacks, yard areas, lot sizes, minimum house sizes, minimum requirements, and other performance standards associated with conventional zoning, plarmed unit development can maximize the development potential of land w'iile remaining sensitive to its unique and valuable natural characteristics. C.Efficiency: The consolidation of areas for recreation and reductions in street lengths and other utility related expenses. D.Density Transfer: The project density may be clustered, basing density on number of units per acre versus specific lot dimensions. E.District Integration: The combination of uses which are allowed in separate zoning districts such as: 1.Mixed residential allows both densities and unit types to be varied within the project. 2.Mixed residential with increased density acknowledging the greater sensitivity of PUD projects, regulation provides increased density on the property if a PUD is utilized. 3.Mixed land uses with the integration of compatible land uses within the project. F.Applicability: Utilization of this zoning district is limited to the Highway 12 Corridor as set forth in the City of Orono’s Comprehensive Plan Amen Iment #2 adopted May 23, 1988. ORONO CC 359-2 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) §10.53' Subd. 2. Allowed Uses; Uses within the PUD may include only those uses designated on the official Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Specific allowed uses and performance standards for each PUD shall be delineated in an ordinance and development plan. The PUD development plan shall identify all the proposed land uses and those uses shall become permitted uses with the acceptance of the development plan. Any change in list of uses presented in the development plan will be considered an amendment to the PUD and will follow the procedures specified in Subd. 6 of this Title. ^ ^ • t.- j-Subd.3.Required Standards; For the purpose of administering this ordmance, the City shall apply the standards contained in the conventional zoning district that is most siinilar to the proposed development. Ii. the event of mixed-use developments, the Zoning*Admimstrator shall determine the appropriate ui»derlying zoning standards, subject to the approval of the City Council Furthermore, the City shall consider the proposed PUD from the point of view of ali standards and purposes of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan to achieve a maximum coordination between the proposed development and the surrounding uses, the conservation of woodlands Md wetlands, the protection of health, safety and welfare of the community and resident of the PUD. To these ends, the City Council shall consider the location of the buildings, compatibility, parking areas and other features with respect to the topography of the area and existing natural features such as streams and large trees; the efficiency, adequacy and safety of the proposed layout of internal streets and driveways; the adequacy and location of green areas; the adequacy, location and screening of parking areas; and such other matters as the Council may find to have a material bearing upon the stated standards and objectives of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Subd. 4. Coordination With Subdivision Regulations; Subdivision review under the subdivision regulations shall be carried out simultaneously with ^e review of the PUD. The plans required under this Chapter shall be submitted in a form which will satisfy the requirements of the subdivision ordinance for the preliminary and final plat. Subd. 5. Revisions and/or Changes. A.Minor changes in the location, placement and height of struc^es may be authorized by the Development Review Committee if required by engineering or other circumstances not foreseen at the time the final plan was approved and filed with the Zoning Administrator. B.Changes in uses; Significant changes in the location, size, or height of structures, any rearrangement of lots, blocks and building tracts, changes in the provision of comi^n open spaces, and ail other chaxtges to the approved final development plan may be made only cr public hearing conducted by the Council. Any changes shall be recorded as amendments to the recorded copy of the final development plan. ORONO CC 359-3 (4-1-84) (5-8^) §10.53 C.All of the provisions of this Title applicable to the original district within which the Planned Unit Development District is established shall apply to the PUD District except as otherwise provided in approval of the final plan. D.Review: If substantial development has not occurred within a reasonable time after approval of the PUD Zoning District as set forth in the Developer’s Agreement, the City Council may instruct the Planning Commission to initiate rezoning to the original zoning district. It shall not be necessary for the City Council to find that the rezoning was in error. Subd. 6. Phasing and Guarantee of Performance. A.The Planning Commission shall compare the actual development accomplished in the various PUD zones with the approved development schedule. B.Upon recommendation of the Planning Commission and for good cause shown by the property owner, the Council may extend the limits of the development schedule. C.The construction and provision of all of the common open space and public and recreational facilities which are shown on the final development plan must proceed at the same rate as the construction of dw-elling units, if any. The Development Review Committee shall review all of the building permits issued for the PUD and examine the construction which has taken place on the site. If they find that the rate of construction of dwelling units i.« greater than the rate at which common open spaces and public and recreational facilities have been constructed and provided, they shall forward this information to the Council for action. D.A letter of credit shall be required to guarantee performance by the developer. The amount of this letter of credit, and the specific elements of the development program that it is intended to guarantee, will be stipulated in the development agreement. . Subd. 7. Control of P'3;:ned Unit Development Following Completion. A.After the certificate of occupancy has been issued, the use of the land and the construction, modification or alteration of any buildings or structures within the planned development shall be governed by the final development plan. B.After the certificate of occupancy has been issued, no changes shall be made in the approved final development plan except upon application as provided below: 1.Any minor extensions, alterations or modifications of existing buildings or structures may be authorized by the Development Review Committee if they are ORONO CC 359-4 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) m ifi: ► hr k . §10.53 consistent with the puiposes and intent of the final plan. No change authorized by this Section may increase the cube of an^uilding or structure by more than ten percent (10%). 2.Any building or structure that is totally or substantially destroyed may be reconstructed only in compliance with the final development plan unless an amendment to the final development plan is approved under Section 10.53 Subd. 5. 3.Any other changes in the final development plan must be authorized by an amendment of the final development plan under Section 10.53 Subd. 5. Subd. 8. Procedure for Processing a Planned Unit Development. A.Application Conference: Upon filing of an application for PUD, the applicant of the proposed PUD shall arrange for and attend a conference with the Zoning Administrator. The primary purpose of the conference shall be to provide the applicant with an opportunity to gather information and obtain guidance as to the general suitability of his proposal for the area for which it is proposed and its conformity to the provisions of this Title before incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys and other data. 1.Purpose: The general concept plan provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the City showing his basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: a)Overall maximum PUD density range. General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. General location and extent of public and common open space. d)General location of residential and nonresidential land uses with approximate type and intensities of development. e)Staging and time schedule of development. Other special criteria for development. ORONO CC 359-5 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) §10.53 2.Schedule: a)Developer meets with the Zoning Administrator to discuss the proposed developments. b)The applicant shall file the concept stage application and preliminary plat, together with all supporting data. c)Within thirty (30) days after verification by the Zoning Administrator that the required plan and supporting data is adequate, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing. d)The Planning Commission shall conduct the hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the City Council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspiq>er at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing and written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior thereto to owners of land within three hundred fifty feet (350*) of the boundary of the property in question. e)The City may request additional information from the applicant concerning operational factors or retain expert testimony at the expense of the applicant concerning operational factors. f)The Council may hold a public hearing after the receipt of the report and recommendations from the Planning Commission. If the Planning Commission fails to make a report within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application, then the City Council may proceed without the report. The Council may approve the concept plan and attach such conditions as it deems reasonable. Approval shall require a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the entire Council. 3.Development Stage: Following general concept approval, if given, the applicant shall submit the development stage application and final plat. The application shall proceed and be acted upon in accordance with Section 10.53 Subd. 8(D) for zoning district changes. If appropriate Lecause of the limited scale of the proposal, the concept stage and development stages may proceed simultaneously. 4.Applications: Ten (10) copies of the following exhibits, analysis and plans shall be submitted to the City: General Concept Stage: a)Preliminarv’ plat and information required by subdivision Title. ORONO CC 359-6 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) §10.53 b)General Information: (1)The landowner's name and address and his interest in the subject property. (2)The applicant's name and address if different from the landowner. (3)The names and addresses of all professional consultants who have contributed to the development of the PUD plan being submitted, including attorney, land planner, engineer and surveyor. Evidence that the applicant has sufficient control over the subject property to effectuate the proposed PUD, including a statement of all leg^, beneficial, tenancy and contractual interests held in or affecting the subject property and including an up-to-date certified abstract of title or register^ property report, and such other evidence as the City Attorney may require to show the status of title or control of the subject property. c)Present Status: (1) (2) The address and legal description of the Property. The existing zoning classification and present use of the subject property and all lands within one thousand feet (1,000 ’) of the property. A map depicting the existing development of the property and all land within one thousand feet (1,000*) thereof and indicating the location of existing streets, property lines, easements, water mains and storm and sanitary sewers, with invert elevations on and within one hundred feet (100') of the property. A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD and the market which it is intended to serve and its demand showing its relationship to the City's Comprehensive Plan and how the proposed PUD is to be designed, arranged and operated in order to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of the City. ORONO CC 359-7 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) 1^A §10.53 Site Conditions: Graphic reproductions of the existing site conditions at scale of one inch equals one hundred feet (1" = 100 ’). Contours; minimum two foot (2') intervals. (b)Location, type and extent of tree cover. (c)Slope analysis. (d)Location and extent of water bodies,* wetlands and streams and flood plains within three hundred feet (300 ’) of the property. (e)Significant rock outcroppings. (f)Existing drainage patterns. (g)Vistas and significant views. (h)Soil conditions as they affect development. All of the graphics should be the same scale as the final plan to allow easy cross reference. The use of overlays is recommended for clear reference. Schematic drawing of the proposed development concept including but not limited to the gener^ location of major circulation elements, public and common open space, residential and other land uses. A statement of the estimated total number of dwelling units proposed for the PUD and a tabulation of the proposed approximate allocations of land use expressed in acres and as a percent of the total project area, which shall include at least the following: (a)Area developed to residential uses. (b)Area developed to residential use by building type. (c)Area devoted to common open space. ORONO CC 359-8 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) ORONO CC §10.5? (d)Area devoted to public open space. (e) (0 Approximate area devoted to streets. Approximate area devoted to, and number of, off-street parking and loading spaces and related access. Approximate area, and floor area, devoted to commercial uses. (h)Approximate area, and floor area, devoted to industrial or office use. When the PUD is to be constructed in stages during a period of time extending beyond a single construction season, a schedule for the development of such stages or units shall be submitted stating the approximate beginni' ’ and completion date for each such stage or unit and the proportioa of the total PUD public or common open space and dwelling units to be provided or constructed during each such state and overall chronology of development to be followed from stage to stage. (9)When the proposed PUD includes provisions for public or common open space or service facilities, a statement describing the provision that is to be made for the care and maintenance of such open space or service facilities. (10)Any restrictive covenants that are to be recorded with respect to property included in the proposed PUD. (11)Schematic utilities plans indicating placement of water, sanitary and storm sewers. (12)The City may excuse an applicant from submitting any specific item of information or document required in this stage which it finds to be unnecessary to the consideration of the specific proposal. (13)The City may require the submission of any additional information or documentation which it may find necessary or appropriate to full consideration of the proposed PUD. 359-9 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) 1 §10.53 Development Stage: Development stage submissions should depict and outline the proposed implementations of the general concept stage for the PUD. Information from the general concept stage may be included for background and to provide a basis for the submitted plan. The development stage submissions shall include but not be limited to: a) b) ORONO CC A final plat and information required by the City subdivision Title. Ten (10) sets of preliminary plans drawn to a scale of not less than one inch equals one hundred feet (1" = 100') (or scale requested by the Administrator containing at least the following information): (1)Proposed name of the development (which shall not duplicate nor be similar in pronunciation to the name of any plat theretofore recorded in the county where the subject propert>' is situated) (2)Property boundary lines and dimensions of the property and any significant topographical or physical features of the property. (3)The location, size, use and arrangement including height in stories and feet and total square feet of ground area coverage and floor area of proposed buildings, and existing buildings which will remain, if any. Location, dimensions of all driveways, entrances, curb cuts, parking stalls, loading spaces and access aisles, and all other circulation elements including bike and pedestrian; and the total site coverage of all circulation elements. (5)Location, designation and total area of all common open space. (6)Location, designation and total area proposed to be conveyed or dedicated for public open space, including parks, playgrounds, school sites and recreational facilities. (7)Proposed lots and blocks, if any and numbering system. (8)The location, use and size of structures and other land uses on adjacent properties. 359-10 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) i g) j) ORONO CC L §10.53 (9)Detailed sketches and provisions of proposed landscaping. (10)General grading and drainage plans for the developed PUD. (11)Any other information that may have been required by the Planning Commission or Council in conjunction with the approval of the general concept plan. An accurate legal description of the entire area within the PUD for which final development plan approval is sought. A tabulation indicating the number of residential dwelling units and expected population. A tabulation indicating the gross square footage, if any, of commercial and industrial floor space by type of activity (e.t. drug store, dry cleaning, supermarket). Preliminary architectural "typical" plans indicating use, floor plan, elevations and exterior wall flnishes of proposed building, '.iicluding mobile homes. A detailed site plan, suitable for recording. ?;howing the physical layout, design and purpose of all streets, easements, rights of way, utility lines and facilities, lots, block, public and common open space, general landscaping plan, structure, including mobile home.>, and uses. Preliminary grading and site alteration plan illustrating changes to existing topography and natural site vegetation. The plan should clearly reflect the site treatment and its conformance with the approved concept plan. i)A preliminary plat prepared in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance. A soil erosion control plan acceptable to watershed districts. Department of Natural Resources, Soil Conservation Service, or any other agency wth review authority clearly illustrating erosion control measures to be used during construction and as permanent measures. Source: Ordinance 67,2nd Series Adopted: 5*8*89 359*11 (4-1-84) (5-8-89) A/ N.Landscaping. 1. r- I>,?>:■ 2. Landscape Plan Requirements. Landscape plans shall be prepared by a landscape architect or other qualified person acceptable to the City, drawn to the scale of not less than 1 inch equals 50 feet and shall show the following: a)boundary lines of the property with accurate Dimensions; a)locations of existing and proposed buildings, parking lots, roads and other improvements; b)proposed grading plan with 2-foot contour intervals; c)location, approximate size and common name of existing trees and shrubs; d)a planting schedule containing symbols, quantities, common and botanical names, size of plant materials, root condition and special planting instructions; e)planting details illustrating proposed locations of all new plant material; f)locations and details of other landscape features including berms, fences and planter boxes; g)details of restoration of disturbed areas including areas to be sodded and seeded; h)location and details of irrigation systems; and i)details and cross sections of all required screening. Minimum Landscaping Requirements. a)All open areas of a lot which are not used or improved for required parking areas, drives or storage shall be landscaped with a combination of overstory trees, understory trees, shrubs, flowers and groundcover materials. The plan for landscaping shall include ground cover, bushes, shrubbery, trees, sculpture, foundations, decorative walks or other similar site design features or materials in a quantiQr having a minimum value in conformance with the following table; 8 Protect Value (Inctuding building construction, site preparation, and site improvements) Minimum Landscape Value Below SI,000.000 $1,000,000-$2,000,000 $2,000,001 - $3,000,000 $3,000,001 - $4,000,000 Over $4,000,000 2.0 % 1.7% 1.4% 1.15% 1.0% In instances where healthy plant materials of acceptable species exist on a site prior to its development, the application of the standards in this section may be adjusted by the City to allow credit for such material, provided that such adjustment is consistent with the intent of this ordinance. A reasonable attempt shall be made to preserve as many existing trees as is practicable and to incorporate them into the site plan. All new overstory trees shall be balled and burlappcd or moved from the growing site by tree spade. Deciduous trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2'/i inches. Coniferous trees shall be a minimum of six feet in height. Ornamental trees shall have a minimum caliper of VA inches. All site areas not covered by buildings, sidewalks, parking lots, driveways, patios, or similar hardsurlace materials shall be covered with sod or an equivalent ground cover approved by the city. This requirement shall not apply to site areas retained in a natural state. In order to pro\dde for adequate maintenance of landscaped areas, an underground sprinkler system shall be provided as part of each new development, except one and two family dwellings and additions to existing structures which do not at least equal the floor area of the existing structure. A sprinkler system shall be provided for all landscaped areas except areas to be preserved in a natural sUtte. -0 Not more than 50 percent of the required number of trees shall be composed of one species. No required tree shall be one of the following: 1)a species of the genus Ulmus (elm), except those elms bred to be immune to Dutch Elm Disease; 2)box elder; 3)a species of the genus Populous (poplar); or 4)female ginko. 3.Interior Parking Lot Landscaping. a)All parking lots containing over 150 stalls shall be designed to incorporate unpaved, landscaped islands in number and dimension as required by the City. All landscape islands shall contain a minimum of 180 square feet. Islands which are necessary to promote the safe and efficient flow of traffic shall not be subject to the ‘i50 stall” standard and shall be required by the city when warranted. b)Parking lot landscape areas, including landscape islands, shall be reasonably distributed throughout the parking lot area so as to break up expanses of paved areas. Parking lot landscape areas shall be provided with deciduous shade trees, ornamental or evergreen trees, plus ground cover, mulch and'or shrubbery' as determined appropriate by the Planning Commission. Parking lot landscape trees shall be provided at the rate of one tree for each 15 surface parking spaces pro% ided, or major fraction thereof. Parking lot landscaping shall be contained in planting beds bordered by a raised concrete curb or equivalent approved by the Planning Commission. 4.Maintenance of Landscaping. The owner, tenant and their respective agents shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping in a condition presenting a healthy, neat and orderly appearance and free from refuse and debris. Plants and ground cover which are required by an approved site or landscape 5. 6. plan, and which have died shall be replaced within three months of notification by the city. However, the time for compliance may be extended up to nine months by the city in order to allow for seasonal or weather conditions. Retaining Walls. Retaining walls exceeding four feet in height, and staged w'alls which cumulatively exceed 16 feet in height or involve more than 4 tiers, must be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect. Landscaping Performance Security Required. UTien screening, landscaping or other similar improvements to property arc required by this ordinance a letter of credit shall be supplied by the owner in an amount equal to at least one and one-half times the value of such screening, landscaping or other improvements. The letter of credit shall be conditioned upon reimbursement of all expenses incurred by the city for engineering, legal, contracting or other fees in connection with making or completing such improvements. The letter of credit shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building permit and shall be valid for a period of time equal to one full growing season after the date of installation of tb^ ’andscaping. The city may accept some other form of security in lieu of a letter of credit in an amount and under such conditions that the city may determine to be appropriate. In the event that construction of the project is not completed within the time prescribed by building permits and other approvals, the city may, at its option, complete the work required at the expense of the awner and the surety. The city may allow an extended period of time for completion of all landscaping if the delay is due to conditions which are reasonably beyond the control of the developer. Extensions which may not exceed nine months, may be granted due to seasonal or weather conditions. WTien an extension is granted, the city shall require such additional security as it deems appropriate. ■% 7.Screening and Buffering. The following uses shall be screened or buffered in accordance with the requirements of this subdivision: 1.Principal buildings and structures and any building or structure accessory thereto used for residential uses at a density of greater than 4 units per acre shall be buffered from residential lots located in any “R” district. 2.Off-street parking facilities containing six or more spaces shall be buffered from streets located within 50 feet. 3.Loadine docks shall be screened from all lot lines andw public roads. 4.Trash storage facilities shall be screened from all lot lines and public roads. Required screening or buffering may be achieved with fences, walls, earth berms, hedges, or other landscape materials. All walls and fences shall be architecturally harmonious with the principal building. Earth berms shall not exceed a slope of 3:1. The screen shall be designed to employ materials which provide an effective visual barrier during all seasons. All requhed screening or buffering shall be located on the lot occupied by the use, building, facility or structure to be screened. No screening or buffering shall be located on any public right-of-way or within eight feet of the traveled portion of any street or highway. Screening or buffering required by this section shall be of a height needed to accomplish the goals of this section. Height of plantings required under this section shall be measured at the time of installation. I Memo Project Name: Orono Apartments Traffic Review To: From: Bryant Ficek Re: Traffic Flow for the Orono Apartments Client: City of Orono File No: 139-98-000 Date: 11/07/00 ^ I Bonestroo Rosene Andedik& Associates 4 Architecti 0 The proposed Orono Apartments will be located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Trunk Highway (TH) 12 with Brown Road North in Orono, Minnesota. 1 To development currently exists on this site. The current site plan, dated October 17, 2000, shows two buildings. One building is proposed to be an apartment complex with 70 dwelling units and would be located on the east side of the site, next to Brown Road North. The other building is proposed to be an office building vvith approximately 23,200 square feet of area and would be located on the west side of the lot. Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers ’ trip generation rates for developments of this kind, the following table shows the estimated traffic volumes to and from the site. Time Period Office E In building Out Senior I In iousing Out Total Site In Trip Ends Out Average Weekday 130 130 120 120 250 250 AM Peak Hour 30 5 5 5 35 10 PM Peak Hour 5 30 5 5 15 35 Average Saturday 30 30 90 90 120 120 Average Sunday 10 10 95 95 105 105 As shown in the table, the site could expect about 250 vehicles in and 250 vehicles out of the site during a typical weekday according to the size and type of these developments. Site Access The current site plan shows the three access drives to and from the proposed development. The first access drive connects to Brown Road North on the east side of the lot. We would recommend aligning this site access drive, if possible, w'ith the access to the bank and private homes on the east side of Browm Road North, creating one four-legged intersection rather than two closely spaced ‘T’ intersections. One lane in each direction on the access drive should suffice for the expected amount of traffic. From this full access driveway, motorists could continue south to the existing full access intersection of Brown Road North with TH 12. Motorists should expect delays at this intersection of Brown Road North and TH 12 due to the traffic volumes on TH 12. We would not recommend a signal at this TH 12 intersection since other nearby intersections in both directions on TH 12 have existing signals. The current geometries at this TH 12 intersection are also adequate for the expected amount of traffic. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates 2335 West Highway 36 + St. Paul. MN 55113 + Phone: 651-636-4600 + Fax: 651-636-131 1 November 7, 2000 Page 2 0/2 The second access drive connects directly to TH 12, south of the proposed site. At the location of this access, TH 12 currently has a closed median. We would recommend a right in/right out only access at this location, leaving the mediatLon TH 12 closed. We further recommend a short right turn lane be created from TH 12 into the access drive. Byre-striping the existing markings with a short taper immediately following Brown Road North, this lane could be created without widening TH 12. One lane in each direction would suffice for the amount of traffic expected for this access drive. A third access is in the northwest comer of the site. Based on site plan drawings and field reconnaissance, we were unable to determine where this access leads. Further investigation will be needed before making a recommendation. However, we would not recommend this access if the drive connects into a residential area. Due to the high volumes on TH 12 and the likely delays for vehicles turning onto TH 12 from the side streets, it is likely that many motorists would seek this route as an alternative to the other access drives. Thus, the amount of ‘cut-thru’ traftic in the connected area would likely increase dramatically. Internal Traffic Flow From the access directly offTH 12, motorists proceed to an internal intersection and are able to choose to go to the office building or the senior housing. This allows vehicle trips to and firom each building without disruption of activity at the other. The access drive connecting to Brown Road North does not provide this type of separation. Motorists using this access to and from the office building would be driving through the middle of the senior housing parking, creating safety concerns. Correcting this potential problem would require changes to the existing site r Ian. Some options include: •Swapping the location of each building so the office building is on the east side of the lot and the senior housing is on the west side of the lot. Although this may result in the undesirable situation of apartment residents driving through the office parking lot, office users are generally used to more vehicle activity in their building ’s parking lot. •Provide a separate drive aisle to the south of the senior housing parking. This puts the parking close to the building while allowing other vehicles to continue through the lot without disruption from parking activities. •Provide a separate drive aisle north of the senior housing building. Apartment parking could remain as shown or be shifted to the north side of the building as well. Either option would allow office users to use this drive instead of going through the apartment parking area. Changes should be made to separate the office users from driving through the senior housing areas. The access drive in the northwest comer of the site could have motorists from the senior housing driving through the middle of the office parking, depending on where this access leads. Although not desirable, office users are generally used to more vehicle activity in their building ’s parking lot. As stated before, this access drive and its relation to the internal traffic flow should be re-assessed when more information is known. Pedestrian Movements To provide additiona' safety and encourage pedestrian movements, sidewalks should connect each building to the existing trail and sidewalk system, located on the east and south sides of the lot. This would allow people from either building another option to use to reach nearby land uses or for general exercise. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates 2335 West Highway 36 + St. Paul. MN 55113 ••• Phone; 651-636-4600 + Fax: 651-636-1311 Memo 1^1 Bonestroo Rosene WTH Andefinc& ^ I Asiocimes £ngln«tr* 4 Arcftit«ctt ► Project Name: Orono Apartments Review To: Paul Weinberger From: Bryant Ficek, Tom Kellogg Client: City of Orono File No: 139-2641 Date: 11/14/00 P Re: Traffic Flow and other issues for the Orono Apartments The proposed Orono Apartments will be located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Trunk Highway (TH) 12 with Brown Road North in Orono. Minnesota. No development currently exists on this site. The current site plan, dated October 17,2000, shows two buildings. One building is proposed to be an apartment complex with 70 dwelling units and would be located on the east side of the site, next to Brown Road North. The other building is proposed to be an office building with approximately 23,200 square feet of area and would be located on the west side of the lot. Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ trip generation rates for developments of this kind, the following table shows the estimated traffic volumes to and from the site. Time Period Office E In luilding Out Senior I In iousing Out Total Site In Trip Ends Out Average Weekday 130 130 120 120 250 250 AM Peak Hour 30 5 5 5 35 10 PM Peak Hour 5 30 5 5 15 35 Average Saturday 30 30 90 90 120 120 Average Sunday 10 10 95 95 1 105 105 As shown in the table, the site could expect about 250 vehicles in and 250 vehicles out of the site during a typical weekday according to the size and type of these developments. Site Access The current site plan shows the three access drives to and from the proposed development. The first access drive connects to Brown Road North on the east side of the lot. We would recommend aligning this site access drive, if possible, with the access to the bank and private homes on the east side of Brown Road North, creating one four-legged intersection rather than two closely spaced ‘T’ intersections. One lane in each direction on the access drive should suffice for the expected amount of traffic. From this full access driveway, motorists could continue south to the existing full access intersection of Brown Road North with TH 12. Motorists should expect delays at this intersection if this project is completed before MNDOT’s realignment of TH 12. As part of the MNDOT TH 12 project, South Brown Road will be realigned to be the fourth leg of the Brown Road/TH 12 intersection. MNDOT plans include signalizing this intersection. Bonestroo. Rosene, Anderllk and Associates 2335 West Highway 36+ St. Paul. MN 55113 + Phone: 651-636-4600+ Fax:651-636-1311 NovemberJ4, 2000 Page 2 of 3 The second access drive connects directly to TH 12, south of the proposed site. At the location of this access, TH 12 currently has a closed median. Wc would recommend a right in/right out only access at this location, leaving the mediatron TH 12 closed. We further recommend a short right turn lane be created from TH 12 into the access drive. By re-striping the existing markings with a shon taper immediately following Brown Road North, this lane could be created without widening TH 12. One lane in each direction would suffice for the amount of traffic expected for this access drive. A third access is in the northwest comer of the site. Based on site plan drawings and field reconnaissance, we were unable to determine where this access leads. Further investigation v/ill be needed before making a recommendation. However, we would not recommend this access if the drive connects into a residential area. Due to the high volumes on TH 12 and the likely delays for vehicles turning onto TH 12 from the side streets, it is likely that many motorists would seek this route as an alternative to the other access drives. Thus, the amount of ‘cut-thru’ traffic in the connected area would likely increase dramatically. Internal Traffic Flow From the access directly off TH 12, motorists proceed to an internal intersection and are able to choose to go to the office building or the senior housing. This allows vehicle trips to and from each building without disruption of activity at the other. The access drive connecting to Brown Road North does not provide this type of separation. Motorists using this access to and from the office building would be driving through the middle of the senior housing parking, creating safety concerns. Correcting this potential problem would require changes to the existing site plan. Some options include: •Swapping the location of each building so the office building is on the east side of the lot and the senior housing is on the west side of the lot. Although this may result in the undesirable situation of apartment residents driving through the office parking lot, office users are generally used to more vehicle activity in their building’s parking lot. •Provide a separate drive aisle to the south of the senior housing parking. This puts the parking close to the building while allowing other vehicles to continue through the lot w ithout disruption from parking activities. This will require locating the drive aisle a bit further south than originally shewn. This will not impact the site any more than shown on the proposed grading plan. A sketch of this option is included with this submittal. •Provide a separate drive aisle north of the senior housing building. Apartment parking could remain as shown or be shifted to the north side of the building as well. Construction of this drive aisle would impact an area north of the buildings not shown to be graded on the proposed grading plan. Either option would allow office users to use this drive instead of going through the apartment parking area. Changes should be made to separate the office users from driving through the senior housing areas. The City should evaluate the proposed access drive in the northwest comer of the site. This access could, at a minimum, provide access to the City’s pump house. Pedestrian Movements To provide additional safety and encourage pedestrian movements, sidewalks should connect each builoing to the existing trail and sidewalk system, located on the east and south sides of the lot. This would allow people from either building another option to use to reach nearby land uses or for general exercise. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderllk and Associates 2335 West Highway 36 + St. Paul. MN 55113-*- Phone: 651-636-4600 Fax:651-636-1311 November 14, 2000 Page 3 of 3 Grading and Drainaee The proposed grading plan shows the parking lot in the northwest comer of the site approximately 10 feet higher than the adjoining property to the south. We recommend this part of the site be lowered at least 4 feet. The retaining wall could then be eliminated and 4:1 slopes graded between the parking lot and the adjoining property. If the proposed grades are not revised the developer should work with the adjoining property owner to replace the existing timber wall with a segmental block retaining wall. The developer should provide storm sewer and ponding calculations for our review. Bonestroo, Ros0ne, Anderllk and Aaaodatea 2335 West Highway 36 + St Paul. MN 55113+ Phone; 651 *636-4600+ Fax:651-636-1311 RUN DATE 10/27/00 DATCH 506 rnor addr OWNER NAME TAXfAYER NAHE/AODR 56 56-116-25 12 0006 00650 BROWN RD N TANA R SEIBOLD TANA R GARRETT 650 BROWN RD N LONG LAKE 101 55556 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 56 56-116-25 12 0007 00690 BROWN RD N ERIC J LARSON ERIC J LARSON 690 BROWN RD N LONG LAKE KN 55556 REPORT NO. PI655601 PACE 19 56 56-116-25 21 0002 02160 WAVZATA BLVD W WILLIAM W WEAR 0 WIFE WILLIAM W WEAR 2160 WAYZATA BLVD 0506 LONG LAKE HN 55556 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 36 36-116-25 21 0015 02109 SU6ARW00D DR DID AHLERS DAVID M I DIANE R AHLERS 2109 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55556 56 56-116-25 21 0016 02103 SUGARWOOD DR R J I S G HOGAN RANDALL J I SARA G HOGAN 2105 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 56 36-116-25 21 0022 02106 SUGARWOOD DR 6 Z GILL IPS GILL GRETCHEN Z I FRANCIS S GILL 2106 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55556 56 56-116-25 21 0025 02110 SUGARWOOD DR \C TAKACN IMG TAKACH CSABA I MARIA G TAKACH 2110 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAK MN 55556 56 56-116-25 21 0026 00056 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC C/0 REBERS C0NSTRIK:T10N CO 5525 WEBSTER AVE MPLS MN 55616 56 36-116-25 21 0016 02107 SUGARWOOD DR T J I V A SMITH THOMAS J SMITH 2107 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 56 36-116-25 21 0019 02101 SUGARWOOD DR RICHARD J I CONNIE L APPLE RICHARD J I CONNIE APPLE 2101 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 56 56-116-23 21 0023 02106 SUGARWOOD DR R M SCHOmER I E M SCHWMER R M SCHOMMER I E M SCHOMMER 2106 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55556 56 36-116-25 21 0026 02112 SUGARWOOD DR K G BERG I K M D DERG K 6 BERG I K M D BERG 2112 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 56 56-116-25 21 0030 00056 ADDRESS IINASSIGNED SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC C/0 REBERS CONSTRUCTION CO 5525 WEBSTER AVE MPLS MN 55616 36 56-118-25 21 0017 02105 SUGARWOOD DR THOMAS J I VIRGINIA A THOMAS J I VIRGINIA A 2105 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55556 SMITH SMITH 36 36-116-25 21 0021 02102 SUGARWOOD DR T M KIMMES I A E KIMMES TODD M I ANITA E KIMMES 2102 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55556 36 36-116-25 21 0026 02106 SUGARWOOD DR M L RICKS I J M RICKS MICHAEL L/JACQUELINE M RICKS 2106 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 36 36-118-23 21 0027 02116 SUGARWOOD DR MCDONALD CONSTRUCTION INC MCDONALD CONSTRUCTION INC 7601 165TH ST W APPLE VALLEY MN 55126 36 56-116-23 21 0053 00056 ADDRESS PENDING GREEN VALLEY ASSOCIATES INC GREEN VALLEY ASSOCIATES INC 2190 W WAYZATA BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55556 •.J *. • —*0 "^'51 ) %. fn IjO lUN DATE 11/27/00 iATCH 5AS HENHEPItt COUMTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM P» )PERTY OWNERS LIST PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 3S SA-11S-2S 22 0015 0003S ADDRESS PENDING C I L OTTEN CLIFFORD A LOUISE OTTEN BOX 2A9 LONG LAKE HN 5535A PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 3G 3A-118-23 2A 0058 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SIDNEY B 0 BARBARA REBERS SIDNEY B I BARBARA REBERS 3525 WEBSTER AVE ST LOUIS PARK HN 55A14 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAm/ADDi 72 34-118-23 24 0002 02073 WAYZATA BLVD W GREGORY M SHAUGHNESSY LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR INC 2073 W WAYZATA BLVD P 0 BOX 497 LONG LAKE HN 55354 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 72 34-118-23 24 0015 00512 VIRGINIA AVE TNOHAS JOHN KIELEY THOMAS JOHN KIELEY 512 VIRGINIA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55354 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 72 34-118-23 24 0027 00535 VIRGINIA AVE KEITH D HILLER KEITH D HILLER 535 VIRGINIA AVE LONG LAKE HN 55354 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 72 34-118-23 24 0034 02049 WAYZATA BLVD W HIBNEL BUDGET RENTAL NIBNEL BUDGET RENTAL 2049 WAYZATA BLVD W LONG LAKE MN 55354 REPORT MO. PI435401 PAGE 20 38 34-118-23 22 0020 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED C 8 L OTTEN CLIFFORD 8 LOUISE OTTEN BOX 249 LONG LAKE HN 55354 38 34-118-23 24 0001 02120 WAYZATA BLVD W WILLIAM WEAR ETAL WILLIAM W WEAR -- 34 HACKBERRY HILL LONG LAKE m 55354 72 3A-11S-23 13 OOIB 01977 WAYZATA BLVD H P S A P A 60SH6ARIAN PAUL A PATRICIA 60SHGARIAN 59A5 LAKEVIEW OR HOUND HN 5536A 72 34-118-23 13 0071 01964 WAYZATA BLVD W STATE BANK OF LONG LAKE STATE BANK OF LONG LAKE 1964 WAYZATA BLVD W LONG LAKE HN 55SS6 1 1.--r' •i..i /•A .• • 72 34-118-23 24 0013 00522 VIRGINIA AVE J J A S H RUFF CHERYL LYN RUFF 522 VIRGINIA AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 34-118-23 24 0014 00522 VIRGINIA AVE J J A S H RUFF CHERYL LYN RUFF 522 VIRGINIA AVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 V, \J VV . ‘ •J 1 72 34-118-23 24 0025 02045 WAYZATA BLVD W D CREAR 8 H B CREAR DAN CREAR 1980 SPATES AVE WAYZATA m 55391 72 34-118-23 24 0024 00545 VIRGINIA AVE D CREAR BHD CREAR DAN CREAR 1980 SPATES AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 a 72 34-118-23 24 0028 00525 VIRGINIA AVE GUY W FELDHANN GUY W FELDHANN 525 VIRGINIA AVE LONG LAKE HN 55354 72 34-118-23 24 0029 00515 VIRGINIA AVI 0 8 C SHEBY OWEN H SHEBY 515 VIRGINIA AVE LONG LAKE HN 55354 (Tv.:14 S'z.A•42 72 34-118-25 24 0039 02045 WAYZATA BLVD W J 8 H INVESTMENTS J 8 H INVESTMENTS 4341 KINGSVIEW LA N MAPLE GROVE HN 55311 72 34-118-23 24 0040 02045 WAYZATA BLVD W JOHN B DRISCOLL JOHN B DRISCOLL C/0 FCI 332 MINNESOTA ST §2140 ST PAUL HN 55101 •4 Q4 ): RUN DATE lt/27/00 BATCH 5B8 PROP ADDR OimER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT m. PIA35401 PAGE 21 72 34-116*23 24 0040 02073 WAYZATA BLVD H GREGORY M SHAUGHNESSY LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR 2073 W WAYZATA BLVD P 0 BOX 447 LONG LAKE MN 55354 INC 72 34*110*23 24 0044 00540 VIRGINIA AVE PAUL S GOSHGARIAN ET AL P S t P GOSHGARIAN 5965 LAKEVIEW DR MOUND HN 55364 72 34*110*23 24 0052 02005 DANIELS ST QUENTIN P NEWSTROM ET AL LAKE ENGINEERING INC P 0 BOX 707 2005 DANIEL ST LONG LAKE MN 55356-0707 72 34-110-23 24 0067 00001 PREMIER DR RJR HOLDINGS CO INC RJR HOLDINGS CO INC I PREMIER DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 500 00040 .V y iAi-k'%j # 9 *• ^ '*•'I ii'4 ‘:/ •I >•* ) Z CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATZON AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY KNOMLEDCE AND BELIEF. DATE *Of] Is liMMifmiiiMliittlMilfli