Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-17-2000 Planning Packet
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 17,2000—6:30 p.m. 2780 Kelley Parkway—Council Chambers AGENDA Council Representative: Richard Flint AUDIENCE MEMBERS: Please sign in for the public record at the front podium if you wish to address the Planning Commission. Applicants will be asked to move to the front table to answer questions when the Chair announces the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for the August 14,2000, City Council meeting unless otherwise noted by the Chair. PUBLIC HEARINGS Review of these items will commence prior to or between scheduled public hearings. Dennis Krump, 25 Stubbs Bay Road North. Variances. (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg). Douglas J. Dayton, 300 Sixth Avenue North, Variances. (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg), .J/' #2597 i'. #2598 SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:0Q^p.m. #2602 John Graham, 1065 Tamarack Drive, Proposed Two Lot Subdivision. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). #2599 Bob and Wendy Beutler, 684 Tonkawa Road, Variances. (Staff: Paul Weinberger), #2600 Brian Kerber, 740 Orchard Park Road, Variances. (Staff: Paul Weinberger). 6. #2601 John and Karen Blank, 2100 Sugarwood Drive, Variance. (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg). PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Report of Planning Commission representatives attending Council meetings June 26, 2000 and July 10, 2000. y Other issues for discussion. M-Planning Commission approval of minutes for June 19,2000. Selection of representatives for City Council meetings on July 24,2000 and August 14,2000, ADJOURNMENT n Public A ttendance Meeting D ate '1. ri - □ C ouncil Planning commission □ park C ommission □ Other___________ NSHSV;, ■ ■■ ■ . : PUEASE FILL^OUrMT^ < ji'--.,> -X ■•■•.•> .yy-'REQUESTED BELQW^^R^TO^,OT RECORDS . •/ •r.' • •' f. ..V - ::'^y NAME (please print>ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 1. M- —SJ2^ 6. 7.. 8*. 9.. 10.. 11.. 12. 13. 14. 15. mtmA 2 s 9 y TOi i.'' 1 Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: July 17,2000 SUBJECT: #2597 Dennis Knimp 25 N. Stubbs Bay Road Variance •• Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IA One Family Rural Residential District (5 acres) Lot Area: 52,050 s.f. (1.195 acre) Lbt of Exhibits A Application Site Plan/ Survey Plat Map Photo of Property Location Map Floor Plan/Elevations Property Owner ’s List Permit Record B C D E F G H Pertinent Code Sections 1. Section 10.27, Subd. 5(B): Front Yard Setback: The minimum requirement for front yard setback in RR-1A is 100'. Variance Request' To permit a front yard setback of 42' for an addition where 100' is required. 2. Section 10.27, Subd. 5(B): Side Yard Setback: The minimum requirement for side yard setback in RR-1A is 50'. Variance Request: To ptermit a side yard setback of 24.2' for an addition where 50' is required. Application Summary: The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to the south side of the residence. The proposal involves tearing down an existing dining room that currently does not have a foundation under it. In the same location, construct a foundation and above it a dining room and 3 season porch. The dining room will be in the same location and the 3 season porch is where the deck is currently located. The addition will be slightly larger than what currently exists because the walls are bumped out to be in alignment with the existing residence. The residence was built in 1963 and the section to be removed was added on in 1968, both before current zoning standards were adopted. Structural coverage is not an issue with this application. The property is served with a septic system and well. Neither the well or septic system are located in the area of the addition. No neighboring residences will be impacted by the 24.2' side setback. The adjacent property to the south is vacant property. The requested variances are: to permit the addition to be located 42' frx)m the fi'ont property line where 100' is required and 24.2' from the side lot line where 50' is required. if2597 Dennis Knunp 25 North Stubbs Bay Road Variance 7/17/2000 Page i i ni [: j? } ’> w e t .’ir? Statement of Hardship ; The {^plicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicants should also be ask^ for their testimony regarding this issue. iMues for Consideration ; 1. The addition will be in the same location as the existing part of the house that is being removed. 2. The south side of the house is currently located 27.5' from the side lot line where 50' is required. The additio'i '*ill encroach 3.3' further into.the side setback. 3. The structural coverage in the lot will increase slightly, but still well below what is allowed. 4. The residence was built prior to adoption of current zoning standards. 5. The lot is small compared to the RR-1A zoning district standard. 6. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation ; Staff recommends approval of front and side yard variances for the addition to the residence. ‘ . « *2597 Dtmis Krump 25 North Stubbs BttyRoad VarUuKt 7/17/2000 Pegs 2 ■i aaium ik- Application #25^7 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Date Received {p~ li~0O comp Amount Paid 2S0 . PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 25* BArV •_____ Property Idendfication Number (P.I.D.’l 3 2. - W P**- 2.3 3^ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired _______I_____________(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: _^residential o ther (specify)_ Zoning District: OimSgi^ APPLICANT Name ytP Phone (home ) 9fTZ <P" Phone (work). Address: Jtl?, City: PcA/^u Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (woric)_ Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail Estimated Construction Cost $ il: t5^QTV /A V Ut/L/SiS — Nc -y TP /r f TU/C^ 3’'i'n>' rA-tf /♦ ssy^r. VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area L/^ Setback: ___Lot Width U^ront L^^ide Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: D/^C, AL,S^ TH£ 'reP IS jO. ilPOAA rUc^ Uj r \^^Ln zjjtz? M<g^g>r bsm >: LAitosn. OikinJi, mh^ K a i s^st?^ (attach addidonaf sheets if necessary) J.LC^ '•n 97jV ) _ • V ^ tC REQUIRED SUBMITTALS AH of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 0 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). ^ ^ SJ-. A 6 Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8 ‘/a" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy iVz* x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy S'/a" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that ymic variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all infoimation required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature ‘ ^Date__^ ^ — OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property' by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date — Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, ptoe make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Builditig & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. L ■; *' I ir ■ or ■(► r v. :« ■ * TdS 5 th Vi If IK z I /23r7V“ 1 1 •M 1 . N4/A/„! 6 NO Ki % No v%» «► .y*% J : Bn/S-K 2«* i*---------------- ••! ■4, 5>4y «/>. »•■ /■'’ \ ,'M v«i it n3,>f ^g&\1 \ .V r..ia^ 1 'NSPl?CTOff_ >-AlV REVigyy Slinorr?^ »*CRMIT NO Q APpfJoVED VWTU « ^*^^0 ^ ^.:. v*i ”"‘£‘ . ' i • ‘N S^ OW Circ .2®'" "» •»*••* .ev .! ^ CITYOFORQNO X SITE PLA.-I X < X\PPnO'/'iD ‘ □ APPROVED vnn rlV)/(e ••■'!; 0 DISAM.a^-, BY ------- .fWTPuo-^ »/ r///^r \• k \■V ^ • M ^ ::>>f S»*ti9A K-oa-sf Linp af Si X’ - o%, & /V ■. ^ ■/ - *i ' ^ •' P.41- . V ^^..V . '.^ ; '.\ N A I hereby c^rtivy tV. •. ♦hlr* 1?^. r^.r^s«*^^!r'»K^v rurvvy nf Uui brurd^rlec of th'.t o»*rt. «>r t.ho OMt'.»f.<an .;a'«r" of the SfJuthwpsY o'i;nrf>*r of .jortlor 32, T"vr.:« .‘r lU* North, M»<r‘j>* >e; t f' *,h ' tK rln-iiol KiorlcU r, jf^:.rrU.cf: foiioua: ^;’:,.i;Ninr wt i r^^tri or. th»! h>fi’ M .e c^* • ju ‘k-uMitert quMr^^X:’ t!.- .;o Ihw-st i:«i^(rlor •ii»Mnl. l.vn,:';) j*te«t. North fTvn! b.i fk>*.tno'.rt», •'um >r of «.nld StN^ho«si quarU;- ')i' th*- /iO':t!nv;*!;t q»iart<r; thenct w* at»,)ar«Jl* I with tne .'Jouth i.lr*o o: Soutnenrt -ii.-»Jr»tjr oi, tho , cutr.voet quirtor n distance of :'oet; thon<*e North var*»iial with mid K.srt '.iKo J diat'.ncfr of l?3.""- ^ect; thencf^ rjast pnroJ.lel wltn ^»'lv .-.o.^lh lint; to '•If’pt .Iho; t**.i.r.* ,,0.1 it lo Viui .K.^it rf ix ;'lir;ln,:, -tT'l th' V*';ati.r> of “U e.;i ;i,i\ ••..!!■] .. » ,'v doo;’- no*. .; ir*'>*'*’ ♦■• ‘n^*o\’ ot v.r 1 ir*>v»* '4 r?•; jr erscr*>:*A «:>> ot.*. £a^/ im^ 9f SW}^ €f S^f09% SB eernt^ { ef • <■• I--------------jsn.9 Jt . .»•> i •>■ • .*. •» I ••• Ip - i* ® ® J B[i& ^ICS0F[lllS[n if tx r U* r»'. ;; a. C-*i'rii. 'i ! \'a"!’i -r «n I !'lM?iii‘>r ■/Ml. .x«'e}, • ^! n''-.<*1ii O?.' D JSJ.'j f < 't‘ •. i ii I ' I t .‘ ? * i . -I I 1 0 'OtlLblXj &'>-M ' i » -» '/t' V " ' ' >- ; ’ ' -^ *>.. . . / > -- . -* r . X '"> » • '• ''.‘'>v% ' ■.: 4 ' ^ .. / > ^ • • ■ Vb''%gL.^r t ! f II? wC^ -V *Y 'J,> J r?!i k\ <- •-.1 -m. * <*">4 snn£<« *-r^' .J-' » *ix i.-fM '1 . T '■*''?• V-' ' _______ .s Reserve OCiR Nia NO ^ ^ ^ t *f ^ . •■• T'- • *.«/' i .»?•'. ■ *■ . ■ .■ - ' • • • • : i^v.c, •i12C0 4..: ; ^ ‘a^*. ^ *■ */•* *•- ’ 3 : <; 0 0 ;Vi; . V. s^v ..*• . ; -y : -vJ '■ • • •>■/ ''y>. :*v •- ^•^■y ^ *>V-> WATZATA •TH AVI H eoo UlLET ■1 ORONO **•., SCHRSriNI OR 'll: 5 /HHNlt]! y... y WEAR CM WATERTOWN WOOC h )*!* >» ' ■■ MPNR- mRI* m HDWOTNOROUtll I 8> ' Uny' j^/ I OAT'400 EOX 8 1 8 H i 9'm 800 / zcAiu • i/r’ PUKI^=5^J!59'7 jJ n' ■ ■* .. ‘ .*cJM - i. ' .^.oimm ;•.- i •>.. ■ ;^ ■■ . •' 'i I' ’I'-i.V "r I » ^•P'- * :a . I !l ti ir-T.-r. *n-... r . ‘-t ... I — •*•••••« s^c/r// £l£vat/^aj 1 -V -1 • ^9k ■ : * • •• :'i-- •■ -ilii © -«p^ 9=! 1 • J rt> 1- o • 3 . . T M • • • • f* I. • m « • • • ..-i L • •• • • %« l\ l\^ I"'. I V ^x/st: \ i\ K K K \ T \• 1 “I • 4 ..-iJ CD MM.MTC M/fT/U MTCH Ut OMNER MAHE TAXTAVER NAHE/ABBR TAXTAVER NAIK/ASOR RMNER NAM TAXRAVtR NAM/ABM .1 . HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATZON SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT IN). PX4S54S1 P/6E AS SO tS*117-2S 21 ion •toss STUOBS lAY RO S CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO CITY CLERK PO BOX AO CRYSTAL OAY NN SSS2S St S2-110-2S SO lOtO tOOSt ADDRESS UNASSXONED JOHN F DUNN JOHN F DUNN 20 S DROWN RO P 0 BOX 77 LONB LAKE NN SSSSA TOTAL BATCH Sit ••••A SB S2-110-2S SO AOAA OAOAS STUBBS BAY RO N R I A KROEOER RICHAM 0 KROEOER AS STUBBS BAY RO N MAPLE PLAIN NN SSS59 SO S2-U0-25 SO tots ttt2S STUBBS BAY RO N R BRINLEY S K TUKUA DENNIS H KRUHP 2S NO STUBBS BAY RO HAPLE PLAIN NN SSSS9 30 S2-110-2S SO ttU tSAOS WATERTOWN RO J N S N L HERIOETH • JOHN H A HARLA MRIDETH SABS WATERTOWN RO NAPLE PLAIN NN SSSS9 SB S2-110-2S AS tttA tSSAS WATERTOWN RO WELDON H DUNN WELDON H DUNN At STUBBS BAY ROAD HAPLE PLAIN NN SSSS9 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTEB ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE .REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATZON AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON TN^CORBS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTMNT OF PRDfERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEOOE AND BELIEF. DATI PRMRTY TAXATION* TO TNE BK >3 Permit No. /y^i PERMIT RECORD Date V7^3- JS S’^Hkhs N Type of Permit AJ4SLU jgtrJS '■ % ft', ’f TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: July 17,2000 SUBJECT:#2598 Douglas Dayton 300 Sixth Avenue (County Road 6) Variance — Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) Approximately 90 acres Lbt of Exhibits A Application Site Plan/ Survey Plat Map Photo of Property Location Map Floor Plan Property Owner ’s List Permit Record B C D E F G H Pertinent Code Sections 1. Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C): Lakeshore Setback : The minimum requirement for lakeshore structure setback for a Recreational Development Lake (Mooney Lake) is 100'. Variance Request: To permit a lakeshore setback of 80' for a 12' x 16' addition where 100' is required. Application Summary: The applicants are proposing to construct a 12' x 16' addition to the residence. The addition is on the lakeside of the residence and is located 80' from the lakeshore. Mooney Lake is classified as a Recreational Development (RD) Lake therefore a 100' setback is required for the structure. The RD classification for Mooney Lake was adopted by the City in 1992. The applicant is remodeling a bathroom and turning the existing closet into a vanity area. The addition is a new closet. The residence is presently located 83' from the lakeshore, the addition will be located 80* from the lakeshore. The residence was built in 1960 before current zoning standards were adopted. The residence is located on approximately 90 acres in the RR-IB zoning district where 2 acres is required. The property is served with a septic system and well. Neither the well or septic system are located in the area of the addition. Also, this addition will not add to the total number of bedrooms, therefore a larger septic system is not required at this time. Structural coverage is not a concern for this property. No neighboring residences will be impacted by the 80' setback. Hardcover is not an issue. The requested variance is: to permit a lakeshore setback of 80' where 100' is required. U2598 Douglas Dayton 300 Sixth Avenue Variance 7/17/2000 Page 1 Statement of Hardship ; The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration; 1. The structural coverage on the lot is not a concern, nor are hardcover or average setback. 2. The residence is currently located 83' from the lakeshore where 100 ’ is required. . 3. The residence was built prior to current zoning standards. 4. So the location, orientation, and interior layout of the existing residence provide sufficient hardship for granting of the variance? 5. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation : Staff recommends approval of the lakeshore setback variance. U2598 Douglas Dayton 300 Sixth Avenue Variance 7/17/2000 Page 2 ?: ■ ft i ■c% CL^' rr^t*r * •*•« ik Application # Date Received h l9-00 Amount Paid cd CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 Afrer-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 300 county Rd S, Wayzata, MN 55391______ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 25-ll8-23~«M\^orol Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired March 1958 I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: x residential ___^other (specify) crop land Zoning District:_____________________________________________ Xmonth/year) APPLICANT Name Douglas J» Dayton Phone (home) 952-475-2928 Phone (work) 763 -545-1416 Address: mo nnnnfey Road ft CitVXJaygiafca Zip:_s5221 OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home). Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 75.000 Describe request in detail: Our bathroom is being remodeled and a 7* x 5* closet is being converted .to a vanity area with sink. This necessitates a new closet 12' x 16' being a : lea on ro rne dressing area.(attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear X Average Lakeshoie Other (specify) HARDSfflP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: The house was built in 1960 and expanded in 1966. We conformed to the setback requirements at that time. Because of the bathroom and vanit’ location> there is no practical way to put the closet on the north side of the house. it puts cne nouse aO' Tht from the OHW versus the present 83*. (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS AH of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels ar:d map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculaticiis as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy SVi" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'A" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy BVi" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this applica.ion, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correa to the best of lus/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature and correa to the best of Ws/her Date ^/la/ OWNER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date ^ UiL 09 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Counril. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. k I •‘liL' #2598 • M- 7*^ MOONEY LAKE Mt COWT(M» UC (OMV) / > ... % t«^« «« Ml ^>'«« «»rM « Mt c» IM4* «• «aic I ictw* »»«fn0iM( r«m«c«•31 FROJtC COFFN k GR0NBER6.1C FROM : COFFIN & GRQNBBRG FAX NO.612 473 4435 / ' HOUSE Jun. 06 2000 09:43AM P2‘ • 'Wr. .* . - '* [ i • /• . . It • «* Y , •* • • • • •««t* • •• «>v .‘••■•A • • 4t/• •• •• • • /• •^ V. » . X. ' V -.'X iXr- rr • * -^s.; .i\r •“x. • • -9 • j;/:: •"-^/rrrv /n '0>>. bV^ LAKE .......^ ew CONTOUR LME (OKW.) 06 06. 00 10:37 AM 603 D ■r- ■ i-s T % .to Cctti t ■ ■ 2^.:■ . m 4i^; k ■ ■ A,. I' in I - im -'■■~tT-r w____...________ Tv*?,', -• 'ias vlflwri;' \\iC^ - • • V • « • t• ill M MIAOOirV OOOS TR 26CO ,w _ ■\»wt ■wTla 2ITH N---^—5 ‘nm a)[i I OWgJitl^ ISTi AV I4TM I 1 1IT1 r^X \ Lake pLYfAi !TH AVf H ^ 14TH AVf R| v-t' -A, 1STH» UTN AVI ■ AVf “t I II - 11TN AVf N 10TM AVI ■ V 800 • V ITM 13 m <JN quiiiisiaiio »*■ *\%K' ■<S» V \tTN AVf N, \ Ur ^ % •••• • •• •(CiinY w w w w ^ « Bikiilf "Plrue'Kir«* *«^22? cjss'a.rw®^ * * •••*. 4 Sjf slflU!!S8 •» ^■irzirj anr gg%i^ •AAONfA I } i 4 V- v^»‘*» s* M.V- >. r f=^ ■-fc, V <4' :■■ ^ *• / t t 3 f • I h I twtf-tow»-- «yi*44c;W IT • • •k • • • •* O O RUN MTC tt/lVta ■ATCH n« HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PlASMOl PACE 0 PROP AMM OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NMK/AOOR PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAMC/AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR TAXPAYER NRME/AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO 2S-1I0-2S SI OOtZ •OfSi AOORESS UNASSICNED SPRING MILL COLF CLUE SPRINO HILL GOLF CLUR 700 SPRINO MILL RO NAYZATA MN 5SS91 SO 2S-110-2S SI 0004 01125 HUNTER DR C R 0 K W PERRY CHRISTOPHER R/KELLY W PERRY 1125 HUNTER DR WAYZATA HN 55591 SO 25-110-23 51 0005 00500 HUNTER PASS RAN DELANEY I A-0 DELANEY RORY I ANE-ORETNE DELANEY 500 HUNTER PASS WAYZATA MN 55591 SO 25-110-2S SI 0000 00925 HUNTER PASS DANIEL YAMRON/DETSY L YAMRON DANIEL 0 DETSY LATT YAMRON 925 NUNTER PASS WAYZATA HN 55591 50 25-110-2S 51 0009 OOOSO AOORESS PENDINO JYLAND DEVELOPMENT INC JYLANO DEVELOPMENT INC 239 LAKE ST E WAYZATA MN 55S91 50 25-110-25 91 0001 00500 SIXTH AVE N DOUGLAS DAYTON ETAL DOUGLAS J DAYTON 500 CO RO NO 0 WAYZATA MN 55591 SO 25-110-25 95 0001 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED D J DAYTON ETAL DOUGLAS J DAYTON 500 CD RD NO 0 NAYZATA HN 55591 50 25-110-25 95 OOOO 00595 SPRINO MILL RO JULIE A FELDMANN JULIE A FELDMANN 595 SPRINO HILL RO WAYZATA MN 55591 SO 25-110-25 95 0009 00555 HOLLANDER RD W N ERICKSON AND ERICKSON HALTER H I NANCY D ERICKSON 555 HOLLANDER RD WAYZATA MN 55591 ID 50 25-110-25 95 0010 00510 HOLLANDER RO J D SIRNAN S J V SIONAN JAMES D 1 JOYCE V SIOHAN 510 NOLLANDER RO WAYZATA HN 55591 50 25-110-25 95 0012 00200 NOLLANDER RO N D CASNEY 0 S N CASMEY N D CASNEY OSH CASMEY 200 NOLLANDER RD WAYZATA HN 55591 SO 25-110-25 95 0015 002*0' HOLLANDER RD JAMES R PAODON JAMES R PADDON 2*0 HOLLANDER RD WAYZATA HN 55591 50 25-110-25 95 0021 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED NILDUR P NOLLANDER NILOUR P NOUANDER 177* DUPONT AVE S MPLS HN 55905 50 25-110-25 95 0027 00250 NOLLANDER RD R 0 JEPPSON 0 L L R D JEPPSON 0 L L 250 NOLLANOER RO ORONO MN 55591 DRAOLEY DRADLEY 50 25-110-23 99 0002 000*5 FERNOALE RD N ST EDWARDS EPISCL CN ST EDWARD THE CONFESSOR EPISCOPOL CNURCN 0*5 FERNOALE RO N WAYZATA MN 55591 SO 25-110-25 99 *005 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DOUGLAS J DAYTON OOUGLM J DAYTON SO* CD RO NO * WAYZATA MN 55591 50 25-110-25 99 0009 00050 AOORESS UNASSIGNED NILDUR P NOLLANDER HILDUR P HOLLANDER 17** DUPONT AVE S MPLS HN 55905 50 25-110-25 99 0*11 0*2*5 NOLLANOER RO 0 L KELSEY 0 C L KELSEY DAVID KELSEY 0 CHERYL KELSEY 205 HOLLANDER RD WAYZATA HN 55591 mm * , # ■UN BATt BATCH SM HCNNCPXN COUNTY PiOPERTV XNFORHATXON SYSTEH PROPERTY ONNERS LIST REPORT NO. PXA354R1 PACE 9 ONNER NANI TAXPAYER NANE/ABBR SB 25-110-25 49 0012 tom SIXTH AVE N B L BKXSCOC I P L BRISCOE B L BRISCOE t P L BRISCOE 99 4TN AVE N MAVZATA HN 55591 50 25-110-25 44 0014 00250 HOUANOER RO R 0 JEPPSON ALL BRADLEY R 6 JEPPSON ALL BRADLEY 250 HOLLANDER RD ORONO NN 55591 30 25-110-23 44 0015 00200 HOLLANDER RD JOHN N HOLLANDER JOHN N HOLLANDER 200 HOLLANDER RD NAYZATA NN 55391 TAXPAYIR NAHR/ADI 40 50-110-22 32 0004 19050 CO RD NO 0 J C 0 E S NACNILLAN JOHN C NACNILLAN ATTN BOB THEXLER BOX 5420 HPLS HN 55440 40 50-110-22 33 0007 19050 CO RB NO 4 H BACON SnHPSON 1905 TRUST HARTNA BACON STXNPSON 1905 TRUST 19050 CO RD NO 4 PLVNOUTN HH 55447 00 25-110-23 13 0004 00000 ‘ ADDRESS UNASSXONEO PETER H BECHELBACHER PETER H BECHELBACHER 1242 HUNTER DR NEDINA HN 55591 PROP ABBR TAXPAYER NAHE/AOBR BO 25-110-23 IS 0005. OOOBO AOBRESS UNASSIGNED e U A J N CROSBY TRUSTEES CHARLES A JUBXTN CROSBY 1252 HUNTER OR NAYZATA NN 55S91 80 25-110-25 13 0004 OOOBO ADDRESS UNASSXONED OOUOLAS J DAYTON OOUBLAS J DAYTON 500 CO RO HO 4 NAYZATA HN 55391 00 25-110-23 14 0005 01242 HUNTER DR PETER N RECNELBACHER PETER H BECHELBACHER 1242 HUNTER OR NAYZATA HH 55591 J**'* V *U •. o < . 4.<. C'J TAXPAYER NMK/ABOR 00 25-110-23 24 0004 012SS HUNTER DR NARTY B SCNNCXDER NARTY B SCHNEIBER 1255 HUNTER DR NAYZATA m 55391 CQ TOTAL BATCH 504 00020 9 X CERTXPV THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION Of IHFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OP THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BES' OF NY KNOHLEOOE AND BELIEF. DATE'6-if-5COi JtM(J Permit No. HQ <V77 kIS /sy3 n9i 1190 i.-u.C.- ^ ns% ‘cm. /Olf. ?7 /073i Jn^Si? '^■o 5.«f(T /?v.'e ■ T PERMIT RECORD Date (oH fe-1-fat' > T- fa4 j/W^ '/ ' 'v' V //- //-j6 f7 f- ,e - f/ ■W Type of Permit A/guu gr<. ^H&0« ftAgAi ’•I uaeu. PuinP rt<^J5s£‘ Bmjtj^T£j^ancnJ fLB(y /y) f ^hufUfn / / ✓* • V ' ,/•. c/-I .y Xicyp’K^ y(^ti't yy/v-jy t<iA. Application Date: 120 Day Deadline: 6/21/00 10/19/00 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:July 10,2000 SUBJECT:#2602 Thomas and Jennifer Graham 1065 Tamarack Drive Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) S.l acres Application Summary:Subdivision of 5.1 acre parcel into 2 lots, with 1 new building site. Lbt of Exhibits A B C D E F G H I Application Location Map Zoning Map Plat Map Topographic Map Section 10.28 Proposed Site Plan Septic Reports Property Owners Notification List Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.28 Standards for lot ;n the RR-IB Zoning District Required Lot Dimensions 2.0 acres/2G0' width Proposed Lot 1 2.0 acres dry/200' width Proposed Lot 2 2.7 acres dry/364' width *2602 Thomas and Jennifer Graham 1065 Tamarack Drive Preliminary Subdivision July 17. 2000 paV-t 1 r. $■ ____ ApplicatioD Review The property is a developed 5.1 acre property that is proposed to be subdivided to create a second 2.0 acre building site north of the existing house. The existing lot was platted as part of the Underhill Farms Addition in 1976. A pond is located on proposed Lot 2. A Flowagc and Conservation Easement was granted at the time the Underhill Farms Addition was recorded. Lot Standards Lot 1 would be the new building site and would meet the minimum lot size and width for lots in the RR-IB Zoning Disihct. The site plans submitted by Mark Gronberg indicate the building pad is located within required setbacks and all setbacks are met to the drainfield sites as depicted on the survey. The lot would share a driveway with Lot 2. An easement would be granted in favor of Lot 2 for access over Lot 1. The minimum setbacks for the property would be 50' from the road right-of-way, 30' from interior lot lines. Please note the site plan indicating the building pad on the property, attached Exhibit G. There is an existing storage building that would be located on Lot 1. The building should be given a reasonable term to remain standing without a principal building. Lot 2 would not have direct access to Tamarack and would not be permitted access to County Road 6. The property owners would prefer to use the existing driveway that would be on Lot 2. A second driveway would require removal of mature trees along the road. The existing driveway was designed with the orientation of the existing house. A separate driveway for proposed Lot 2 would make maneuvering a vehicle to access the garage difficult. Both properties shall enter .to a Maintenance Agreement that would describe each lot owners responsibility for maintenance. It is possible Hennepin County may have additional requirements for that portion of property located along County Road 6. Lot Dimensions Lot Summaries: Total Acres Acres Required Lot Width Required Lot Width Proposed Lot 1 3.1 Ac. 2.7 dry 2.0 Ac.200’200’ Lot 2 2.0 Ac.2.0 Ac.200’364’ Total 5.1 Ac. • Both lots meet all requirements for subdivision. 12602 Thomas and Jennifer Graham 1065 Taminck Drive Preliminary Subdivision July 17. 2000 pagt-2 Septic Review The City Council adopted a new Septic Code recently that does permit slopes of up to 12% for mound systems. Previously, sites could only have a 6% slope. The lots have both demonstrated two sites on each lot that would permit the land to subdivide with the new standards. The designs have been approved by Chris Pence, On-Site Systems Manager. Easements 1.Standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat 1 O' along exterior property lines and 5’ along interior property lines. 2.An easement and maintenance agreement shall be recorded with the final plat for the shared driveway access. The easement shall describe the area required to accommodate both lots. 3.A certified list of all easements recorded on the property shall be submitted prior to final plat application. Park Dedication Fee Staff recommends the property owner pay a Park Dedication fee for one new lot rather than offer land for a park dedication. Before Preliminary Plat approval the City Assessor will calculate the market value of the property. The Park Dedication fee is equivalent to 8% of the value of the lot, with a minimum fee of $2,900 and a maximum fee of $4,900. The Park Commission will review the preliminary plat application on August 7,2000, prior to City Council review. Staff Recommendation Both lots meet the requirements for subdivision and have demonstrated suitable septic sites. Staff reconunends approval of the Preliminary Plat. Planning Commission Options for Action: 1. *) 3. 4. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat and forward to the Council, with conditions. Recommend denial, stating reasons. Table, requesting further information and provide direction to the applicant. Other Action. 02602 Thomas and iennifer Graham 1065 Tamareck Drive P'elimtnary Subdivision July 17. 2000 pagt-3 Application #llaOS.A Date Received (o Amount Paid oo CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ___ Site address /OU^ DA.__________ Property Identification Number (PID) HU \ ODO^ Please check one - Property ____abstract or V torrens? Attach legal description to application. Address y Phone (home) Zip____Phone (work) (oSllPf<^'3^f^ OWNER (if different than applicant) ^amg I 0»x-v. o<-aJA>I r^ci^ Address ^sr* City Otaxjo_______________________Zip Phone fhome ’l Phone fwork'l ToQ (attach list if more than one) EXI>i:iNG LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size nn 0 4 Present use (check) Present Zoning District Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______ PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes _________Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) X* Subdivision for New Building Sites _Existing Units _New Units Total Units Number of Building Sites I J Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) o) Units per S*« 1 Acres ^113 0 Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residenti^ Other (specify)_______— t: V? :y 'O'' jiW aaatk SEE MAP 4{3 MEDINA V>-2600 OIER HUI^ no CHEROKEE RO HEAOOWI OOOS TR y VnEN RO 1200 ':ouRTn RO^^ f?m ■sT^nj SJQM.K ^ v;ooos 5 ^ DR L s 8 1 g\ ) , in' * •• ^ Long Lake ' * - .. • w • ; • . S» • :• • * * . ■ *i- .\.** i Wi l«0 * . .•• sajl/i ;• 4*'d'ffl ■N !/ n^SD^ m 0 I Bikmg ... ........................................ ^»e /JXydiard:'^ i. % Lake 7'.^?!^' LOV 600 ^ •. • • • •—fiJfaVg i ■>3^a^r% ^------i^rr ' . -Rf, V’.'. • u . BikfniTV-. >; ••• 'Wayzit Country ( • •*• •. •- O • \* • ^Sr/o «fRO ■I •■■li.'-t'f'v. - Sw* . ^ ; i « ' ®®STK» • V • • ♦ r* • •*. ryCIi ilfCou r 8J«S3< S ly IM _ OCIfliaa S ^ WA o /- § 10.28 SEC. 10.28. RR-IB ONE FAMILY RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Subd. 1. Purpose. The "RR-lB" One Fanily Rural Residential District is intended to provide a district which will allow a combination of low density residential development and limited agricultural activity. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any "RR-IB" One Family Rural Residential District, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A. Any permitted use as regulated in the "R-1 A” District. B. Personal Wireless Service Antennas and Towers. 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section is to establish predictable, balanced regulations for the siting and screening of wireless communications equipment in order to accommodate the growth of wireless communication systems within the City of Orono while protecting the public against any adverse impacts on the City's aesthetic resources and the public welfare. 2. Personal Wireless Service Antennas. Personal wireless service antennas erected on a municipal structure may be allowed as a secondary use by administrative permit, provided they comply with the City policy regarding the use of City-owned property for wireless telecommunication antennas and provided they meet the following conditions: a. The antenna shall be in compliance with the Minnesota State Building Code and all other applicable federal and state regulations and permits. b. Structural design, mounting and installation of the antenna shall be in compliance with manufacturers specifications and shall be verified and reproved by a registered professional engineer. c. No advertising mesage shall be affixed to the antenna. d. Antennas shall not be artificially illuminated unless required by law or by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to protect the public's health and si^ety. e. When applicable, proposals to erect new antenna shall be accompanied by any required federal, state, or local agency licenses. f. Transmitting, receiving, and switc!/i-.g 5v, ^ipment shall be housed within the existing structure. If a new equipment building is neces?;ir> for transmitting, receiving and switching equipment, it shall be situated in the rear yard of the principal use and shall be screened from view by landscaping. ORONO CC 289 (4-1-84) r k' §10.28 g. All obsolete and unused antennas shall be removed within twelve (12) months of cessation of operation at the site, unless an exemption is granted by the City Administrator or designate. The removal shall be the responsibility of the communication provider. h. Antennas shall utilize camouflaging techniques or shall be side mounted to an antenna support structure in order that such facilities are compatible with the character and environment of the area in which they are located. i. The applicant shall demonstrate by providing a coverage/interference analysis and capacity analysis prepared by a registered professional engineer that the location of the antenna as proposed is necessary to meet the frequency spacing needs of the personal wireless service system and to provide adequate portable personal wireless service coverage and capacity to the area. Source: Ordinance 161,2nd Series Effective Date: 5-27-97 Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any "RR-IB" One Family Rural Resident!^ District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit. A. Uses. Any conditional use as regulated in the "R-l A" District except for "Duplex Credit" and "Animals". B. Farms (Stock). Provided that the area is ten or more acres. C. Hospitals, Etc. Hospitals for human care, sanitariums, rest homes, iiursing homes, provided that all buildings are located 100 feet or more from the lot line of any abutting lot in an "R" District. The site shall contain not less than 600 square feet of lot area for each person to be accommodated. Source: Ordinance No. 185 Effective Date: 6-14-76 D. Libraries. Non-profit libraries provided that all buildings are located 50 feet or more from the lot line of any abutting lot in an "R" District. Screening and signage requirements shall be determined with each individual conditional use permit. Source: City Code Effective Date: 4-1-84 ORONO CC 289-1 (4-1-84) i .. ■! 11 11 lll^llll^l ■! II 1l< if iiWd 1 I I»fin—Till I I i I ni fc ia —I i^Mnaii ni ■ m I ■ ri Ifc ftw minta iti '-mrm-ft ■' V i n~ii1 rt iiiKi n^i -----If i 11-if I Til n -1 Mir fir~TirirtTM § 10.28 Subd. 4. Accessory Uses. Within any "RR-IB" One Family Rural Residential District, the following uses shall be a permitted accessory use: A. Any accessory use as regulated in the ”R-1 A" District and "Aiumals as regulated in Section 10.20, Subdivision 3, Subparagraphs M and N. I-'Source: Ordinance 26,2nd Series Adopted: 7-14-86 Subd. 5. Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements. A. Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. B. Lots. The following requirements shall be observed: Lot Axfia Lot Front Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to StISfii- Rear Yard 2 acres 200 feet 50 feet 30 feet 50 feet 50 feet * I ORONO CC 290 (4-1-84) 1 i A i.uiuiu Westwood Weilen Associates Westwood Profossional Services. Inc.lT lofZ 3701 12m Street Norm Suite 206 St Cloud. MN S6303 June 8,2000 Phone: 320-2S3-949S Fai: 320-2$3 0737 Toll free: 1-600 270-949S Email wpt#westwoodps com Thomas Graham 1065 Tamarack Drive Orono, MN SS3S6 RE: Septic System Site Plan for Lot 3, Block I, UNDERHILL FARMS, Hennepen County. Dear Thomas: This proposed on-site septic system was designed for a 4 bedroom home with an estimated flow of 600 gallons per day. Due to mottled soils at a depth of 12” in the septic site area, the system will need to be a mound system with 24 ” of sand under the rockbed at the upslope side. The site in which this system is proposed has a average existing ground slope of 10% and percolation rates ranging from 17.1-24.7 MPI. The rock bed size will be 10 feet wide and SO feet long with the overall dimensions of the mound being 70 feet long and 37.8 feet wide. Two 1000 gallon septic tanks and a 1000 gallon pump tank will be required for this septic system. Based on our evaluation there is adequate room on the property for a alternate septic site. The alternate septic system also is shown and designed. This septic site will also need to be a mound, it can be used in the event of the primary mound failing Certain precautions wilt need to be made to protect the area in which the above referenced septic systems are proposed. It is critical that the soil is not disturbed before, during, and after construction of the system. The^ptic area should be staked off with visible fencing prior to construction. This system should treat the septic efnuent effectively if the system is installed properly and is maintained properly. It is recommenced that the septic tanks be pumped every two years. This will reduce the chance of solids reaching the mound system. It is also recommended not to use excessive amounts of chlorine, soaps, and anti-bacterial products which can kill bacteria in the septic tanks, dius causing the system to fail. This bacteria is needed to treat the septic effluent. If you have any questions in regards to this design, I will be happy to answer them. I can be reached at (612) 682-2587. Sincerely, Bemie Miller Septic Site Designer MPCA Lie. No. 43 ar 4. ■7 rr.i \ \ C«*v :iH* iifi.gi* ii4Ltf Westwood Wellen Associates Westwood Professional Services. Inc.w •H /ofZ- 3701 12thStruet Nofih Suite 206 Si Cloud. MN S6303 June 8,2000 Phone: 320-2S3-949S F.11 320 2S3 8737 loll free 1 800-270-949S Email wpsPwesiwoodpicom Thomas Graham 1065 Tamarack Drive Orono, MN SS3S6 RE: Septic System Site Plan for the proposed north 2 acres of Lot 3, Block I, UNDERHILL FARMS, Hennepin County. Dear Thomas: This proposed on-site septic system was designed for a 5 bedroom home with an estimated flow of 600 gallons per day. Due to mottled soils at a depth of 19 ” in the septic site area, the system will need to be a mound system with 17 ’ of sand under the rockbed at the upslope side. The site in which this system is proposed has a average existing ground slope of 6% and percolation rates ranging from 16-2S.3 MPI. The rock bed size will be 10 feet wide and 60 feet long with the overall dimensions of the mound being 87 feet long and 41.5 feet wide. Two 1300 gallon septic tanks and a 1300 gallon pump tank will be required for this septic system. Based on our evaluation there is adequate room on the property for a alternate septic site. The alternate septic system also is shown and designed. This septic site w ill also need to be a mound, it can be used in the event of the primary mound failing Certain precautions will need to be made to protect the area in which the above referenced septic systems are proposed. It is critical that the soil is not disturbed before, during, and after construction of the system. The septic area should be staked off with visible fencing prior to construction. This system should treat the septic effluent effectively if the system is installed properly and is maintained properly. It is recommenced that the septic tanks be pumped every two years. This will reduce the chance of solids reaching the mound system. It is also recommended not to use excessive amounts of chlorine, soaps, and anti-bacterial products which can kill bacteria in the septic tanks, thus causing the system to fail. This bacteria is needed to treat the septic effluent. If you have any questions in regards to this design, I will be happy to answer them. I can be reached at (612) 682-2587. Sincerely, Bemie Miller Septic Site Designer MPCA Lie. No. 43 .. . 'ITt \ ;. • • • *V lib* -i; tli* 7i«Ju» mu. BATE M/21/B*NENNEflN COUNTY PROPERTY IHFORHATIOH SYSTCH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PM554S1 PACE 20 •ATCN SM PROP ABM TAXPAYER NANE/ABOR Si 24-110-2S SI 0000 RlStt SIXTH AWE N JOHN R SHEEHAN JOHN R SHEEHAN ISOO-iTN AVE NO LONO LAKE NN SSS50 Si 20-11S-23 SI 0007 01111 TANARACX DR S 1 A C A BRENNAN SIDNEY L BRENNAN JR 17105 24TH AVE N PLYNOUTH HH 55007 Si 2i-iis-2S SI oooa 01090 TAHARACK DR CHARLES C DUNNAVAN CHARLES C DUNNAVAN 1000 TANARACK DR LONO LAKE HN 55S50 % *1^ 1 ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ABBR Si Xi-lli-2S SI 0000 OlOiB TANARACK OR T N BRANAH S J J ORANAN T H ORANAN B J J GRAHAN 10*5 TANARAOt OR LONO LAKE NN 55S5* Si 2*-lli-2S SI 0010 OISSO SIXTH AVE N M E BOHACH i S BOHACH WALLACE E S SUSAN BOHACH ISSO COUNTY RO * LONO LAKE HN S5SSO Si 2*-lli-2S SO 0005 OllSB SIXTH AVE N E H S H S SPENCER EDSON W A HARRIET S SPENCER 1135 SPRING HILL RD LONO LAKE HN 55S5* OMMER NANE TAXPAYER Si 2*-llt*2S SO OOOi il20» SIXTH AVE N JEN ROTONDO JOHN B NAOOHNA ROTONDO 1205 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAKE HN 5535* SB 2*-lli-2S 02 0000 OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSICNED SPRING HILL GOLF O.UD SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HN 55S01 Si 2*-lli-2S 02 0005 OOOSi ADDRESS UNASSICNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RO WAYZATA NN 55S01 i ^ .»• \ f fv TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 50S OOOi? I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACC^TE AND REPRESENTATION OF INFORNATZON AS IT A^^^***OF Tia HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTNEHT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF DATE 4'It I TITKlTTitlnf. hlilOt Mill niipaui •liliw^ii :TfiWl '.TCiWl TrrriiirrrtK ilMUiIil riTiviii ilV;^ ^ I li^ PWU «• H K P.T‘XilMWe.1 III iHMl mnri i]i«h^ ^TilPTiK M74M r«vrt 0«U0ii rt rif:i ^TiTi KTtlll n ■ tI4 Cl ^ rt ■ ii4 ciiip< \ » I] 0 i%] fcTiIF.l I dll •Idi ri7rmrti.wiiiw iirdiiriT.'CiCi •IMCi •inn I rir*J:Tt:i [iTipawii •iinnifiT*j Milflfldri P.lfiTil •IMCiBin •nnni OTiTiIiT.'fiTi ro P.T •¥• ni • Cili ildlfli mvsiinivAd ririnfTOfTni^TO^ •■inifli niMii F:Ti n n f ni ipi ■ ip i d c^t •It •fsnnniiiiiinii pic*nijiipnci ^afnxinrti niiippxxii •itiiiira ruipi rifknmipixi ns riTi1 f: Wi:« wWn I [•■•IililW nnirt»mwiBiYi niflci nsHCt]PldnSflililMiSt niaiininpic*! m .T T, r» m vrjir» ; K.* L IV. Grading/Drainage Staffhas requested the applicant provide a grading and drainage plan indicating the new house would not adversely effect adjacent properties. As of the date of this memo, the City of Orono has not received the grading plan. The grading plan shall be approved by Staff prior to the issuance of a building permit should the Council approve the variances as requested. Staff Recommendation Staff makes the following recommendations: To approve the variance application for lot area and lot width based on the fact the lot is developed as a single family dwelling, has been provided sanitary sewer service and it would not be possible to acquire additional land to create a conforming lot. To approve the average lakeshore setback variance to permit a 12' encroachment into the average lakeshore setback based on the following findings: Construction of the house in the proposed location places the house 100' from the lakeshore. The proposed location of the house best utilizes the topography of the lot. Using the flat area of the property would permit a house to constructed without requiring additional gradmg beyond what would normally be pennitted with new home construction. Impacts to the lakeshore views for the property to the north would be minimal. The existing house is located 20' closer to the lakeshore than the proposed new house. Options for Action; 1. Recommend approval of variances. 2. Recommend denial of variances, stating reasons. 3. Table for additional information. 4. Other action. I2S99 Bob and Wendy BeuUcr 684 Tonkawa Road July 17.2000 S' «.i jnAfei Lot Area: ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LR-IB Lot Area Required 43,560 s f. (1 acre) Actual 29,564 s.f (.68 acre) Structural Coveraee: Total Lot Size_____________________ 29,564 s.f Total Structural Coverage ______________ Allowed: 4,434 s.f (15%) Existing; 1,759 s.f (6%) Proposed: 3,585 s.f. (12%) Hardcover Calculations; Distance from shoreline 0-75’ 75-250' 250-500' Total area in setback 6,376 s.f. 14,878 s.f. 8,310 s.f. Allowed hardcover 0 s.f. (0%) 3,719.5 s.f. (25%) 2,493 s.f. (30%) Existing hardcover 1,286 s.f. (20.1%) 5,201 s.f. (34.9%) 3,357 s.f. (40.4%) Proposed hardcover 492 s.f. (7.7 %) 3,718.5 s.f (24.9%) 1,858 s.f (22.3%) Applicant shall provide revised hardcover calculations with the grading and drainage plan to indicate hardcover is in conformance with the calculations that have been provided. I2S99 Bob md Wendy Beutler 684 Tonkawa Road July 17.2000 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area; Structural Coverage; Hardcover Calculations: Applicant shall provide revised hardcover calculations with the grading and drainage plan to indicate hardcover is in conformance with the calculations that have been provided. #2599 Bob and Wendy Beuiler 6S4 Tonkiwi Road July 17.2000 A LR-IB Lot Area Required 43,560 s.f. (1 acre) Actual 29,564 s.f. (.68 acre) Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 29,564 s.f.Allowed: 4,434 s.f. (15%) Existing: 1,759 s.f. (6%) Proposed: 3,585 s.f (12%) Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing hardcover Proposed hardcover 0-75'6,376 s.f 0 s.f (0%)1,286 s.f (20.1%) 492 s.f (7.7%) 75-250'14,878 s.f 3,719.5 s.f (25%) 5,201 s.f (34.9%) 3,718.5 s.f (24.9%) 250-500'8,310 s.f 2.493 s.f (30%) 3,357 s.f (40.4%) 1,858 s.f (22.3%) Application # ol5^9 Date Rccdved G~<S(-CC> Amount Paid ^0^ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change firom original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 ' After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) yy To'ik-t.u^ /?g| j Orot^o Property Identification Number (T.I.D.’l OX-iJ'J 33 f t Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired_______________________ I (do) /do noO also own the adjacent parcels of land. .(month/year) Pi^nt use of property: residentiai Zoning District: other (specify). APPLICANT Phone fhome V^ “7/0I ^ Name /?o^ BcuHer- Phone (work^r^ 7 Address: 'rcy^W<iU<^ Hd' City:Orc^g _________Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ____________________ Phone (home). Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ^OC.OCV* Descrite request in detail: -V p "Vvjjty \4. CX va X \V hyMv. o. v>ftf 1 Vo , or 0^0^ W e v>S •'<p\cM\^b«Cc^' VARI^CES REQUIRED ^ V Lot Area v Lot Width 1/^ Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear / Lot Coverage Averse Lakeshore Other (specify) - •*.* C^CCOw^^x:v<^^ rC.^V/C_« _j 4 1*' -,: h> ^ '• l'^ /T%.».*f \ ' J ^ J' % * \' i •i ’•arafina fr /4= I.......' <U vt______________ • inn *«. I OROMO . -j *•<- & •• • *1 ^ iMi / A *w • -.•M* ■p WEM cn <1 S Minmii- 5 ir*” 2g j 0 S MAf UU W| U|t3 g . WATEBTOWK WD Q th OHOU^ ^ ^ ^ LA4o|Kl oew T lT SOMERSET i'i__ LONCVIEWC - • • imnE 400 :<c^ IS 800 y.• • • . • » • I .• • • f Crystal .. Boiiru Point Crystal Bay * • . • . •• . / • \ *.•*.•**•*• * •*•• • * • ^ •* •• ■ ••/vM" L»f*y; V^i;Vr>^Dtrv w.yw.M. ^ort/u r«A '* • . . . • • • • . . • . • • . • ¥ • • •' # O K • m . i k • at • • W— V. • > •••■■ -V d :i •r-vc‘.y Air< SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) F.XISTINC HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _____________ Length HARnrOVT^ CArCTII.ATION WORKSHEET X X ■ X 75-250’ Width 250-500’500-1000’ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. Q'Z /of3' B. Garage S.F. ^ K- C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Q. Other X X X X X X X X X A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE / + B X 100 B _ _ X 100 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _____________ Length Width B. Gan^e C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X IS- /2- .... X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE '■nz + B r,21^o X 100 - /23"6 n.s/c (cyic T7^ 3 ^ /zr(^ ZO.J^ Zoo C.376, 52 S.F. S.F. S.F.i S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % u^CCi/ ‘ ; rj S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F.^*''-/"i^ S.F. S.F. S.F. ‘S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B HARDCOVER CALCUL/mflJi^VORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 05-250’^ 250-500* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______ Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underiain By Plastic X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A A 3; ZQL * B i%r7r + B X too X 100 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Son I Lefiith Width /0-r X X X ru B.Gange ZZ C.Driveway ly 7-Z.nr D.Sidewalk ZH E.Patio/Deck X X zz iz ^ ________ X X /r ) ;t)o ) J5 _______ X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic X X X G. Other 57'^“='' 3,7/r _ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE•.r.Z.2JJ'* B /•'i.S'ir___X100 « « 500-1000* /O’C; n mo / ?r S'/(c- 2/r /v.TTr -pcf'iO Z.( (j ZJ0.7 77. 'G' S.F. X o fS S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 4^ 2*L1^ S.F. S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. SJF. S.F. SJ. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B S.F. in>r' S.F. 4 _____S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. >. S.F. S.F. ’\ . ,v : I •^1S.F S.F S.F. S.F. S.F. A S.F. B % HARDCOVER CALCULATION W ORK % r SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ EXISTING hardcover IN ZONE A. House ______________ X 75-250*500-1000* Length Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck f. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Odier X X X X X X X X X X X X A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 2,isi - B ^310 B _____ PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House ______________ Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway D. SidaweHc E Patio^ck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other 2Z r X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B HZlO T a S.F. S.F. .. < >S.F. ss 1 TW S.F.'/<-‘i>'« I as S.F. n 3/S.F. «S.F. 3*2.SS. S.F. SS. SS. m SS. «SS. SS. izr SS. zjs-r SS. A •S.F. b/^^^ X 100 ” X 100 -•% ^ m t Y'’SJ. V t-V -• m S.F. ^ - S.F. \ %■ ' > - S.F. / ' . m un K 370 r ^ r ss. Vo as /ro ss. zro S.F. *^.,1? as zr-ST. * V^** aa Z](» S.F. - S.F. S.F. - SJF. m S.F. S.F. m /r«53^S.F. A •^ZIO S.F. B X 100 -•z.'2.3 •/o 1 fc... -«• to ll .* r j** V •2^ I 'li fi/|Roe«vfiR KBMivfkX.% h\r^ 9 WHA* m mm^rndm •••* « f N V4m. W tfamiQ aV^tM t«. 4>«« ••( MMrA‘ V4*4ft _ W«4 S*T«4iv«ar| 1 tli: ‘-J^-------n*'"-1 --------Jgi i:—--W n *« «a4i>r. • ' S.»«fc<ri»»jr-| I *—rOH **^1-----j-4 %»-»•«•* .. , / \ V ® '*! 2 • “ \r^% . ^ I I- I l^”"'\ ■ ■ i««<t I %!<••• .«J If Jrtti ft “il>n I L^U *4 •(&•>? r -rMnr^-j “\ -j ® f"* I / • • lJj4A4W4rr»l^ r V Y j J YV j J**J- ^ ^ J ftIr2 *111'f - r____tm v.»*_ i ' - ~dm^ mmi)j^\^ iTli u 1 T ^•JLm l4*«K,4>i J!lll M»-l* - ""!1 V*''-**:• MTE #»/!§/»♦ '\/^ I 511 . HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST • «w« UUI ••• • •• PACE wnnsil NAM TAXPAYER NAIK/AOPR PROP ABOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR f .# so 0B-117-2S SS OOOO #0070 TONKAWA RD MREL J LEIPOLO DAREL J LEIPOLD 070 TONKAWA RD LONO LAKE NN 55350 SO 0S-U7>2S SS till 00000 TONKAWA RO J SUNDET 0 R SUNOET JOHN 0 REOECCA ^JNOET 000 TONKAWA RO LONG LAKE NN 55350 SO 0S>117>ES SS ono 00700 TONKAWA RD T H SPOONER I J H SPOONI TED N SPOONER 10005 SUNAC CIR EDEN PRAIRIE NN 55307 so 05-117-25 SS OOOY 00070 TONKAWA RD CEORCE L TORKELSON ETAL OEORCE L TORKELSON 070 TONKAWA RO LONO LAKE HN 55356 SO 05-117-25 55 0010 00600 TONKAWA RD NELINDA LEE HELXNDA LEE 600 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 SO ■ 05-117-25 33 0012 00090 TONKAWA RO N S DRADLEY 0 0 N DRADLEY NICHAEL S 0 OLIVIA H DRADLEY 15905 XVYWOOD ST N W ANDOVER HN 55300 30 05-117-2S 35 0013 00092 TONKAWA RD DARDARA PUGH BARDARA PUGH 092 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE HN 55350 30 05-117-25 S3 0019 00005 TONKAWA RO TENPLE ISRAEL OF HXNNEAPOLXS TEHPLE ISRAEL OF NINNEAPOLXS 2320 EMERSON AVE S HPLS HN 55005 TOTAL BATCH 501 00000 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND ■rraESFNTATXON OF XNFORNATXON AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATXON* TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. . DATE A Ap• 1 iaiiiii fcrt irniMR n nr.■ Arairii MfttiTi a 1 Application Date: 60 Day Deadline: 6/21/00 8/20/00 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE;July 10. 2000 SUBJECT:#2600 Brian J. Kerber 740 Orchard Park Road Variances — Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IA One Family Rural Residential District (S acre) 4.8 acres Application Summary: The applicant has submitted a land use application requesting variances to permit construction of a 60’ X 40' (2.400 square foot) pole bam on a 4.8 acre property where the Code permits a maximum stmcture of2,000 square feet, and a second variance to permit relocation of the two stall garage 72.9 from the side sUeet lot line where 100* is required. No detached garages or other accessory buiMing can be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal building on a non-lakeshore lot. List of Exhibits A Application B Application Summary/Hardship Statement C Plat Map D Letter Confirming Septic Sites E Property Owners Notification List F Site Survey/Site Plan Pertinent Code Sections Section 10.03, Subdivbion 9 (Accessory Structures) In all "R" Districts no accessory building shall exceed 1,000 square feet of footprint area except that accessory stmctures in excess of 1,000 square feet will be allowed under the following conditions: 1. Not more than one Oversized Accessory Structure (OAS) shall be permitted on any property. An "Oversized Accessory Structure" is defined as an accessory structure of footprint area in excess of 1.000 square feet. <2600 Brian J Kerber 740 Orchard Park Road Variances July 17.2000 r 2. Oversized Accessory Structures are regulated by the following table: Lot Area 0-1.99 acre 2.00- 3.00 acre 3.01- 3.50 acre 3.51- 4.00 acre 4.01- 4.50 acre 4.51- 5.00 acre 5.01- 6.00 acre 6.01- 7.00 acre Ma.ximum Individual Accessory Structure Footprint Area 1.000 s.f. 1.200 s.f. 1.400 s.f. 1,600 s.f. 1,800 s.f. 2.000 s.f. 2.200 s.f. 2.400 s.f. Ma,ximum Allowed Total of All Accessory Structure Footprint Areas* on a Property 2.000 s.f. 2.400 s.f. 2.800 s.f. 3,200 s.f. 3,600 s.f. 4.000 s.f. 4.400 s.f. 4.800 s.f. Review of Proposal The proposed pole bam is 400 s.f. greater than what is allowed for an oversized accessory building on a property. The applicant has stated he would like to use the larger building to store snowmobiles, automobiles and house a workshop. Mr. Kerber also owns a seeding service and would store his tmck and trailer within the building. The property is located in the 5 acre “rural” area of the City along County Road 6 and Orchard Park Road. There are two adjacent residential properties. Neither of the buildings would be fully visible to adjacent properties, and would not be visible to the property to the south based on the mature trees between the lots. The house, across Orchard Park Road, is blocked from view to much of the applicant ’s property by mature trees along the road. Reducing the size of the pole bam to 2,000 s.f would allow the applicant to build the structure without the need for a variance. Relocating the structure to another portion of the property would not be possible without replacing the septic system, which is depicted on the site survey. The existing system has been determined to be non-compliant due to the 3' separation to the water table, however it is not required to be replaced until 20 10. Additional testing has been completed to locate a future primary and secondary site on the west side of the property. The proposed location of the bam would best utilize the driveway. The garage is located approximately 88' to the side (County Road 6) property line. Mr. Kerber would like to relocate the building to accommodate the pole bam location. The only concern by Staff is the garage should be staked to ensure a 26* wetland setback. Review of Hardship The applicant has submitted a project summary and Statement of Hardship attached as Exhibits A (Application Fonn) and B. 12600 Brian J. Kerber 740 Orchard Park Road Variances July 17,2000 (• Staff has confirmed the location of the septic tanks and drainfield restrict the property from allowing construction of a pole bam behind the house. South of the drainfield, the property drops off and is very low, the water table and drainage would be a concern. This would also require extensive regrading and construction of a verj' long driveway to the rear of the property. Using the existing drive for access to the pole bam would be the preferred alternative. This does require the removal of a two stall garage v'hich has recently been renovated with a new roof. To relocate the shed elsewhere on the property would not be practical as the garage would remain with access to the driveway and out of the septic areas. The entire east half of the property cannot be developed because it is a designated wetland. A primary issue is the size of the pole bam. To grant a variance a hardship must be demonstrated. ITie hardship appears to be the property owners need, for additional storage space. This may be a convenience to the property owner and not a hardship inherent in the land. Staff is concerned with the precedent that may be established by approving an oversized accessory building. Staff Recommendation Staff makes the following recommendations: To approve the variance to relocate the garage 72.9’ from the north property line where 100' is required based on the following findings made in the Review of Hardship: The location of the septic tanks and drainfield restrict the property from allowing construction of a pole bam behind the house. South of the drainfield, .he property drops off and is very low, the water table and drainage would be a concern. This would also require extensive regrading and construction of a very long driveway to the rear of the property. Using the existing drive for access to the pole bam would be the preferred alternative. This does require the removal of a two stall garage which has recently been renovated with a new roof. To relocate the shed elsew here on the property would not be practical as the garage would remain with access to the driveway and out of the septic areas. The entire east half of the property cannot be developed because it is a designated wetland. To deny the variance to permit a 2,400 s.f. pole bam to be constructed on the property subject to the finding: • A hardship must be demonstrated to require the larger building. The hardship appears to be the property owners need for additional storage space. This may be a convenience to the property owner aad not a hardship inherent in the land. Staff is concerned with the precedent that may be established by approving an oversized accessoiy' building greater than what is permitted by the ordinance. #2600 Bnan J Ketbei 740 Orchard Park Road Vanances July 17.2000 H Options for Action: 1. Recommend approval of variances as presented. 2. Recommend approval of variance to permit the garage to be relocated and deny the variance to permit an oversized accessory building. The property owner is permitted by the code to construct one oversized accessory building with a maximum size of 2,000 s.f. 3. Recommend both variances for denial, stating reasons. 4. Table for additional information. 5. Other action. i2600 Brian j Kerber 740 Orchard Park Road Variances July 17.2000 f L A Applicatioii # ______ Date Received 6 *o2/' Amount Paid ______ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 Afler-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) QPROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address ^Ji ^ ctaAjo , /HV , Property Identification Number (P I.D.’l 11 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired I (do) .(month/year)•j?—. •:>x: '• > also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: \/residentid _other (specify). Zoning Distnct:. APPLIC Name Phone fhome l Address: AA City: CroMo C OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ____________________ Phone (home). Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: /httut led (attach additional shero if necessary) ft" VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area 'rLt.i- ^PuPlltr (Lcii Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) Stf\ HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Stuar Aie Pri cLtX Far 'to Wty _^littk w ^ g|*c4 ♦ OlA Tl »M fr.0T —^ *'* LuiiLiM y Pr (attach additional sheets if necessary) B BRIAN KERBER 740 ORCHARD PARK RD ORONO MN 55356 I WOULD LIKE TO PUT UP A 60 x 40 (2400 ) SQ FT, POLE SHED WHERE THE 22 X 24 SHED IS NOW + MOVE THE 22 x 24 SHED ONTO A NEW SLAB 20 FT AWAY FROM OLD LOCATION. WE HAVE DONE ALL THE MEASUREMENTS FOR THIS LOCATION AND DO TO THE EXISTING SEPTIC LOCATION WE CAN NOT GO BACK FAR ENOUGH TO KEEP THE FACE OF THIS POLE SHED.FLUSH WITH THE FRONT OF THE FACE OF THE HOUSE, BUT THIS IS WITHIN 8 FT OF FLUSH, I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FOR THIS LOCATION + THE EXTRA 400 SQ FT OVER THE 2000 SQ FT (TOTAL OF 2400 SQ FT ). THE EXISTING 22 x 24 SHED IS ALREADY IN FRONT OF FLUSH WITH THE FACE OF THE HOUSE,SO I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE IT JUST NORTH EAST ABOUT 20 FT... THIS WILL STILL BE OVER 110 FEET OFF THE CENTER LINE OF CO RD 6... THIS IS A 5 ACRE LOT THAT IS FULL OF MATURE EVERGREEN TREES AND NOBODY CAN EVEN SEE IN HERE,,, THE SHED WILL BE USED AS WORKSHOP. STORE MY SNOWMOBILES CAR TRUCK ,TRAILER AND OTHER TOYS THAT HAVE BEEN GETTING RAINED ON FOR A LONG TIME. I HAVE A ONE MAN ( ME ) SEEDING SERVICE THAT WOULD LEAVE IN THE MORNING WITH A TRUCK AND TRAILER, AND PARK IN THE SHED IN THE EVENING. IDONT HAVE A REAL PROBLEM WITH COMPLETELY REMOVING THE 22x 24 SHED FROM THE PROPERTY, BUT IT WAS RESENTLY REPAINTED AND REROOFED, IF IT IS POSSIBLE TO SAVE IT, THIS WOULD BE REAL NICE. I HAVE HAD THE 2 ALTERNATE SEPTIC SITES MARKED BY BOB VOLKENANT AND THE PROPERTY RESURVEYED BY JIM AT ADVANCE SURVEYING AND THIS IS THE BEST SITE FOR THIS PROJECT.. THANK YOU BRIAN KERBER S f • / . # *! ' V h' * .; •»' 30-/15'as -1 Li. 3l-ll5-il3-(H)3a - IIS'<33' y.>..I? . • • • J(* • W ►. tjt I i V? U ^ 1 • /V u u • • . tT June 16 2000 Re: Soil Boreings, Percolation Tests, System Design. Brian Kerber 740 Orchard Park Rd Orono We were retained by Brian Kerber to provide criteria for the on-site sewage system for the property located at 740 Orchard Park Rd. In the City of Orono There were a total of 6 soil borings and 4 percolation tests done on this site and it appears that there is room for a new primary arxi alternate sites for septic systems on this property. This is based on a three bedroom, type one, single family home with maximum flow of 450 gallons per day. This house exists on this lot at this time. From these tests it was determined that a high water table exists at a depth of 16 to 24 inches below the ground surface. The high vrater table determines that only a mound type drainfleld may be installed, to meet with code. Percolation tests range from 6 to 12 minutes per inch on the two sites tested. All neighboring wells are located greater than 100 feet from the proposed drianfield site. See attached sketch for locations. These areas must be protected from any traffic to be used for any future septic sites. If they are not protected the data collected herein will become Void and new testing shall have to take plac«. This design is in compliance with local codes and Minnesota Pollution Control Chapter 7i of the date listed above. Respectfully Bob Volkenant MPCA Ucense #56 M f\ ft 0 1 Uj mm DATE •*/19/At MTCN HENNEPIN COUNTY PHOPEHTY INPOHHATIOH SYSTEH PROPEItTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PXASMRl PACE S PROP ABM TAKPAYSR NANE/AOM OWNER NAHi TAMPAYBR NAHE/ABM NANE TAXPAVIR NANE/A8M 30 E9-110-2S SS RtM •SME SIXTN AVE N NORTHERN STATES POWER CO NIP PROPERTY TAN DEPT 414 NICOLLET HALL NPLS NN SS4II SS SR-11S-2S 44 RtSA ••ess HUNT FARN RO NUNTINOTON FARN HONE OWNERS JEFF HARTXN ?•• HUNT FARN RD LONC LAKE HN 55SS4 SS S1-11S-2S 11 •••S ••745 ORCNARO PARK RO R K 1 N A SANSEVERE ROBERT K S NARY A SANSEVERE 74S ORCHARD PARK RO LONO LAKE HN 5SS54 SS S2-11S-2S 22 SSSS •sots SIXTH AVE N NXCNAEL A ALEXANDER NXCNAEL A ALEXANDER SS2B 4TN AVE N LOND LAKE NN SSSS4 SS S2-11S-2S 22 •••4 •••SS ADDRESS UNASSX6NED ROBERT T NXCXELSEN ETAL JIN WHALEN 1442S SSTH AVE N PLYNOUTN HN 55444 SS S2>11S-2S 22 •••4 •44SS ORCHARD PARK RO D E WINTERS SDK LAND DOUOLAS E WINTERS 4S» ORCHARD PARK RD LONS LAKE HN S5S54 SS S2-11S-2S 22 •••7 ••744 ORCNARO PARK RD SNXRLEY A NETNAN SNXRLEY A NETNAN 74R ORCNARO PARK RO LONO LAKE HN 55S54 TOTAL BATCH 5«2 ••••7 V A X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF XNFORNATXON AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST 1 OF NY KNOWLEOBE AND BELIEF. date' TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: July 17,2000 SUBJECT: #2601 John/Karen Blank 2100 Sugar Woods Drive Variance •• Public Hearing Zoning District:R-1 A/PRD (1-Acre Density) Actual Lot Area: 33,902 s.f. (.778 acres) List of Exhibits A Application/Applicant Letter Site Plan/ Survey Resolution #2653 creating PRD of Sugar Woods Sugar Woods Homeowners Association letter Supplemental Sheet to Building Permit Application with Attachments A & B Hardcover Calculations Plat Map Photo of Property Location Map Property Owner’s List Permit Record B C D E F G H 1 K Pertinent Code Sections 1. Section 10.03, Subd. 14(D): Rear Setback: Tennis courts - when such accessory structures exceed 1,000 s.f. footprint area shall be subject to the following special setback restrictions: Rear yard-30' minimum and not within the required rear yard area. 2. The PRD creating Sugar Woods, Resolution #2653 adopted July 10, 1989, establishes performance standards for each lot. It defines an allowable building pad for principal and accessory structures by establishing specific setbacks (50* front and rear, 30' sides). It also limits the hardcover to 80% of the building pad and lot coverage to 15% of the entire lot. The only hardcover allowed outside the defined building pad is a narrow driveway to the road. Application Summary: The applicants are proposing to construct a 29' x 55' sport court in the rear of their property. The proposed sport court will be located 1 O' from the rear property line where 50’ is required. Resolution #2653 was adopted in July 1989 creating Sugar Woods as a Planned Residential Development (PRD). The resolution states approval was based on limiting the development and future use of property within Sugar Woods (See Exhibit C). It specifically defines building setbacks and limits hardcover improvements. »260l John and Karen Blank 2100 Sugar Wood Drive yariance 7/17/2000 Page / These standards were established not only to provide buffers but to protect the wooded character of the unique Sugar Woods property. These standards are one of the primary reasons this area was rezoned and the plat approved a decade ago. As stated in the Supplemental Sheet to Building Permit Application (Exhibit E), the applicant’s are required to present their proposal to the Sugar Woods Homeowners Association. The applicant’s presented their proposed plan to the Board of Directors of the Sugar Woods Homeowners Association at their May, 2000 meeting. The Board of Directors unanimously approved the plan (Exhibit D). Abbreviated Review Process Not Applicable The Supplemental Sheet in Attachment B also defines an abbreviated review process for applicants unable to meet the special requirements for residential development in Sugar Woods. This abbreviated process was established to allow Planning Commission to deal efficiently with the expected requests for driveway location problems, without involving the Council. In staffs opinion this process was not intended to apply to accessory structure setback variances, especially when such structures would not only be in violation of the special more restrictive standards for Sugar Woods, but would also not meet the less restrictive general zoning standards or the standards for the underlying R-1A zoning district. This item will, therefore, be sent to Council for final action. Statement of Hardship: The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1. 2. 3. Total property hardcover including the sport court and existing driveway, will be an area equivalent to just under 57% of the building pad area, meeting the 80% limitation. Will moving the sport court further away from the rear property line require less trees to be removed? Is there another location on the property for the sport court? Could it be located meeting the required setbacks? Applicant should be asked to provide a tree inventory map to assist in reviewing this issue. Outlot A was intended to provide an additional 50' buffer and protected area around the perimeter of the Sugar Woods plat. The expectation was that accessory structures would be buffered from the adjacent 2-acre lots by both the 50* outlot and the 50' setback requirement. Will the proposed sport court location have any impact on neighboring properties? f(260l John and Karen Blank 2100 Suganv 'od Drive Variance 7/17/2000 Page 2 4.This is the first known application in Sugar Woods for an accessory structure encroachment of a protected yard area. There have been a small number of requests under the supplemental rules for driveway encroachment at the time of home construction. Driveways going straight in from the street are the only allowed hardcover encroachment of protected Sugar Woods yard areas; a few have been granted variances to angle in to protect specified trees. 5. Does Planning Commission have any additional issues or concerns with this proposal? Options for Action: 1.Recommend approval of variance to allow the sport court to be constructed on the property as shown on the survey. 2. Require the sport court to be moved further from the rear property line; any setback less than SO' still requires a variance. 3. Advise applicant what other possible revisions will make the application acceptable. 4.Other. Staff Recommendation: Keeping in mind the potential for establishing a precedent. Planning Commission should review the applicant's submittals and stated hardships, and determine whether justification exists to grant the requested variance. U2601 John and Karen Blank 2100 Sugarwood Drive Variance 7/17/2000 Page 3 r. /Q k? -I -v'*'' .1 i CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Application # 9\l^O ! Date Received U Amount Paid PROPERTY INFORMATION . Site Address ^00 ^vurtkr' yriJ^Sr¥Uf(Kr dJfi Numoer (P.I.D.'Property Identification Num\?er (P.I.D.) 3^- tit'^3-.31- D q QO __________ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired MjCxd-- ___________________________^(month/year) I (do)^tdono^]^so own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use oTproperty: f^^sidentitJ ___pother (specify)______________________ Zoning District: iC > I A APPLICANT Name Address: ?-(«s Phone qiomeffr>; _____ Phone (work)_______ City: ___________Zip: OW'NER (if different than ^pplic^t) Name Address: Phone (home). Phone (work)_ City:.Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: M%^uL ^ ^ L>»4iua A u^yrJiS- hit^JLiA, ikJL. ^ ^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side t-'^ear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: O UAjJLU^d* ttjt, ^cjodtOH. (jnJjBL Ll, %t$B^Lr^'V€Q. ^ iOu/i CmJ/^ucA'nt. c/*st^A A/l. uocSL 7^ TLa '/At fkJU additional sheets if necessary) • M A M M ^ M ^ Ml ^ ^ CHUU^ A*XKt£, /itSC. Ct4A^.. . ... A . ^ a REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete; 1. 2. 3. _i/ 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150’, labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/i" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/i" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 854" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current cwuf!r(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that juuu variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. DateApplicant’s Signature ^ OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the propert>' by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature >ses or investigation ana veriii Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planniiig Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make .arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building 8l Zoning Office of this change, prior to the meeting. % SURVEY PQB; SrOf/gg & !<^OPPeLMl=*N Prepared By: l^OSl’lCM-tgi-safeo-g CITY OF ORONO SITE PLAN__ GRADING PLAN KAPPROVED U APPROVED WiTH REVISIONS Cl DISAPPROVED IlY Id -30 'Ai_________- SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. tHOlHItM - • im itiTiMO •imwikpmm ^niai . •lAVirtf IftAI wAVIAI* eLV»* MIMMIfOIMlA. MM. IMO i«itt fikCt ! 0.0 so.o m M * I 9 N 9: <wttv> { ^ <»W.» ind • * lemenr _________________ in M»oi Tree I \ iVs nfsrilPTIOi; LoK I, tIocK <, SUOM WOD*. acc«rdlnf !• Ih* rccortled plat thereof. ■CMCtMMKl . Spike in latli In 20-lneh m$pl* tree at ahoan. Elevation ® 10J6.1 gWgM. PQTESt I Oenntea Iran wwawwit fcuid. O - Danatet Iran norMant aat. O > Oenotat wood atafce aat. afins.S - Oanatat ailtcfno «V*t alawatlon. an040.S> - Oanatet prapoted apot clavatlon. Dtfiotaa the dfrectlan of \ lurface drafna#a. rropatad tap of foundatlcn elevation > Prepoiad wallwait alavatlan ■ MB7.S. Propoaod taraso floor alavatlan • lol 26 W>- » &0.0 toh«.^ 1 hereby certify that this survey was prepared under my supervision and that 1 an a Licensed Land Survi^yor under the laws of the State oM^itsota. do Theodore D. Ketnna’heodorc D. Ketnna Wl.Wnt Hrantn Kft. ITOOfi This drawing has been checked and reviewed this tVi ____.day of lOt-.-hob-rr- \^aC- bv r. m City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2653 _________ A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OP SUGAR HOODS FILE NO. 1334 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and exlst:ln9 under the laws of the State of Minnesotar and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development or land within the City; and WHEREAS, on July 10, 1989, the City approved a conditional use permit. Resolution ♦ 2^6_52-» Residential Development of 25 single family detached residential units within the R-IA Residential Zoning District requiring a minimur.! of 25 acres; the property consists of 32.6 acres. The proposed development plan was found to satisfy all pertinent standards of Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (H) of the Planned Residential Development Ordinance. The approval or tne conditional use permit was also based on the subdivider agreeing to the following limitations on the development and future use or the property: 1. Each building pad is defined by specific setbacks as follows : Lots 1 through 4, Block 1: 50' front and rear 40' side All other lots in Blocks 1, 2, 3 and 4: 50' front and rear 30' side 2. Each building pad is limited to 80% hardcover improvements as defined in Article IX, Section 16 of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements of Sugar Woods. Such improvements will include the access road through the portion of the property located within the front street setback area. C. Page 1 of 5 . .. MMAil m City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2653_________ 3. The open space areasr Outlets A & B, and the defined setback areas within each of the residential lots shall be restricted from all grading/land alteration activities# and no tree in excess of 2" in diameter at 4* in height shall be removed unless it is diseased or presents a hazard. Limitations of grading and tree removal shall not restrict the area of the access drive within the front street setback area. WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a plat by Sidney Rebers and Barbara Rebers, husband and wife, and Rebers Construction Company, a Minnesota Corporation (hereinafter "the subdivider")? and WHEREAS, Sidney Rebers and Barbara Rebers, have deeded Cutlot. D, Sugar Woods to the Sugar Woods Homeowner's Association, Inc., a Minnesota non-profit corporation? and WHEREAS, the subdivision of a Planned Residential Development has been found to meet all pertinent standards of the subdivision regulations of the City finding that each lot is of ^ size and configuration that will allow its use as a single f^ily residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances? and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution ^2554 that granted preliminary approval of the subdivision and Planned Residential Development. 2. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements 3. Dedication on the plat of rights-of-way for public streets and roads shown as Brown Road North and State Highway 12. 4. The creation of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlot C, to be known henceforth as Sugarwoods Drive. Page 2 of 5 r. ' I ^ A.City of ORONO i* S5V':^ r RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2653_ _ _ _ _ 5, Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the subdivider has dedicated to the City a road and utility easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over Outlot C; the subdivider has created non-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements over said outlot in favor of all abutting and/or benefitting lots, including .a declaration of certain maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting and/or lot owners througn their homeowners' association covenants and agrees to permanently maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private road. 6. Dedication to the City of a drainage easement providing for limitations on the use of a detention pond and drainageways described therein and shown on the plat as drainage easements with Outlot F. 7. Execution of a Subdivider's Agreement providing for the installation of certain improvements as a condition of subdivision approval and the posting of acceptable security to the City to ensure the completion of these improvements. 8. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication fee in the amount of $10,000.00. 9. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat, easements and covenants. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Orono hereby approves the plat of Sugar Woods, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following condition; 1. The subdivider shall post security with the Public Works Director of the City of Orono in an amount to be determined by the City Engineer to ensure that all damage to Brown Road sustained during the construction period of Sugarwoods Drive and the early building stages for residential construction are repaired to the City's satisfaction. The subdivider is hereby advised that the City may choose to request extention of coverage of the security beyond the original agreed upon two year period depending upon the building schedule for the proposed development. Page 3 of 5 . •***"^'W !-‘^mu'iM c>rfr3\wj ^:t City of OflOINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2653_________ 2. All construction vehicles used for the installation of the private road shall enter and exit only from U.S. Highway 12. The subdivider is to provide appropriate signage to control traffic during the construction period. No construction traffic shall be directed to use Sixth Avenue North. The subdivider shall be held responsible for the enforcement of the approved traffic pattern. 3. Prior to the filing of t.he final plat, associated documents and covenants, the subdivider shall have completed the execution of an agreement or petition agreeing to pay without appeal for sanitary sewer and water lines to be installed in or near Highway 12 by the City. 4. Outlot D, a portion of future east/west road located within the commercial zoned portion of the property, shall be installed at the time of the development of Outlots E or F or the development of the Wear property (unless the City has obtained an alternate legal access through Outlot E to the Wear property all subject to the approval of the City). 5. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Registrar of Titles on or before January 10, 1990 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants noted above. The execution of the plat by the City of Orono and the filing of the plat shall be conclusive evidence that the subdivider has satisfied all conditions set forth in this resolution. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. ATTJ5ST: Dated this 10th day of July, 1989. V ~7?1. \l4iAi orothy City Clerk" James R. Grab^kr^Mayc^ Page 4 of 5 r. ilS ■City of OROINO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2653_ _ _ _ _ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) ss • ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of July, 1989, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor « City Clerk of the..City of Orono, a Mxnnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. (hjMd //' \SL Ai Notary Publi vVi.K. SCMSFf'JLAURIF K. SCMSrf LER motas» n»uc - MIN.-IISOIA H-NNWIN CO.'NTY My commiii^cn •*pifasd-8-9J Commission" ^ *5> Page 5 of 5 A m •* City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2654_________ H» . ..r; A RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO FILE THE FINAL PLAT OF SUGAR HOODS HHERBAS, the City Council has approved the final plat. Sugar Hoods, on July 10, 1569 for Sidney Rebers and Barbara Rebers, husband and wife, and Rebers Construction Company, a Minnesota Corporation (hereinafter "the subdivider")? and WHEREAS, the subdivider has fulfilled all of the requirements of Resolution #2653 that granted approval of the final plat and Planned Residential Development? and WHEREAS, on July 10 , 1989 the Council of the City of Orono hereby ordered a public improvement project calling for the extension of municipal sewer and water lines to the property within the Sugar Hoods plat. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby directs its staff to file a certified original copy of this resolution, and executed copies of the easements and covenants required with the approval of this plat with the Registrar of Titles Office of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of July, 1989. ATTEST: ^>!^othy ^ Hallin, City Clerk ds R. GratJamiGrabelc,^ayor STATE Of '^MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of July, 1989, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public My Commission E*p4*e^ SK. SCHcFFLER H£NN ‘PiN CO uNH r 2006 Sugar Woods Drive Orono. Minnesota 55356 Susar Woods Homeowners Association June 19,2000 Planning Commission City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is in reference to a request from John & Karen Blank, residents of 2100 Sugar Woods Drive, Orono MN 55356. The Blanks presented a plan for the building of a sport court and gazebo in their backyard to the Board of Directors of the Sugar Woods Homeowners Association. This request was made at the regularly scheduled meeting of May 21,2000. A copy of the plan is attached. After review of the plan and the bylaws, the plan was unanimously approved as presented. We hope you will consider their request. Sincerely, Steven Schroll Treasurer II ^ '.V -I b ^4 4-.' liii-MiTturrmw SURVEY FOR: Srcwgp & KoPP^^-^^ /^ 1 m OF ORONO 1 —--------------l#:nQS^» ICH- igi»^ 1 Prepared By: _____________________ - me. naoB THi IvW.'l CITY OF ORONO K, SITE PLAN__ GRADING PLAN KAWHOVED □ APPROVED WITH REVISIONS D disapproved qY «mm SCHoitnrMi^SONJ^- ,OH *»»■«•**-—* O i ^ i*®on"* •. , *i\j5aS4^---------------------'K* xlir^ 1 SpiilrB tn *g^,?S». «u»' f^tprdad pUt tK*r«*t« »S. •e«*rdlRP *• «** Sg*g^.o, i» »-i«* aS; '•" " ■^' Etlvatlw “ tWi*' 2. 1. 4. iai.n —• yBHTtee (£ I If isusIXt*-: AjrS rp ■*•*** \: V® ^ 2*'^ ^ Prt^*T«a«r s. d. 7. B. 4. O *______-«l ----------------- S wtS'- •«>•«« *»•' OW.W •►• "M**** •' Ss sr « 1 hariby certify thtt this survey w preytred wider «y supervisloe end tejt 1 la i Uceesed Lmd Surveyor under the lem of the State of HJ^esoU. fm IM. dr«.l«? A« ‘'“'Hy “f reviewed this -------19 9/ • . . .^J ___ r SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF SUGAR WOODS SUBDIVISION In Addition to the plans, specifications and information requested in the Orono Building Permit Application packet, the following is required by special resolution of the Orono City Council of all applicants seeking to obtain a building permit within the Sugar Woods subdivision; 1. 2. 3. Your site plan must designate the Specific Building Setback Area for your lot. A) front 50', rear 50' and side 40' for Lots 1 through 4, Block 1; and B) front 50', rear 50' and side 30* for all other lots in Blocks 1, 2, 3 and 4. Per Orono resolution #2652, each lot shall be served by a single driveway/one curb cut at a 20* maximum allowed width. The driveway width shall be measured parallel to the loop road, Sugarwood Drive. The portion of the drive located within the front/street setback area shall be placed in a straight alignment from the loop road and shall not be curved. An inventory of all hardcover on the lot must accompany each application (see worksheet attached. Attachment A). All hardcover improvements on each lot shall be within the building pad defined as that portion of the lot that is not within the building setback area (exception; the driveway leading to Sugarwoods Drive located within the front building setback area, retaining walls and similar land scaping structures that may be built within the front building setback area). The hardcover improvements for each lot shall not exceed 80% of the area of the building pad for each lot. The hardcover areas of each lot shall include the surface area on the ground of each of the following improvements on the lot (the inventory shall include allowed improvements within the front/street setback area); A) Footprint of each and every structural improvement on the lot, including each house, garage, accessory building, porch and covered walkway; B) All wooden decks and boardwalks regardless of the spacing between the planks on the surface; C) All driveways and parking areas that are paved or graveled; E) All walkways and patios that are covered with asphalt, concrete, paving blocks (regardless of the space in between the blocks), or covered with gravel, rock or woodchips upon an underliner (whether the underliner is impervious or not), but not those walkways that are dirt, grass or gravel, rock or woodchips without an underliner; J F) Each and every landscaped area with an underliner (whether the underliner is impervious or not), regardless of whetrher the area is covered with woodchips, stones, dirt or plants; Any swimming pool or wading pool; H) Any tennis court covered with concrete, asphalt or clay, but not any tennis court covered with grass. 4.Lot Coverage. Per Ordinance 80, 2nd Series adopted February 26,1990, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of lot area. The following shall be included in calculation of lot coverage by structures: a) b) all roofed structures which extend more than 6* above grade level; tennis courts, patios, decks and all similar open structures when partially or fully enclosed by fences, railings or walls which extend more than 6* above grade level (if any portion of such structure extends more than 6' above grade level, the entire structure shall count towards lot coverage); pools, including pool basin and associated deck or patio areas, regardless of whether such pool basin, deck or patio is enclosed with a fence. 5. 6. 7. All lots shall be provided with a functional means or method of backing out. The City will not approve the backing out of motorued vehicles onto Sugarwood Drive. For all applicants who find they cannot meet the required standards for development within the Sugar Woods Planned Residential Development, please refer to Attachment B for special directions. Written confirmation from Rebers Construction that the building plans and site plan have been approved by the Architectural Review Committee for Sugar Woods. At the time a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a new dwelling within the subdivision of Sufjar Woods, the City has agreed to execute and deliver to the owner of each lot a partial release of suMivider's agreement for that lot. Upon the recordation of such partial release of subdivider's agreement, the Registrar of Titles is authorized and instructed to remove from the Certificate of Title for the lot, the memorial of this instrument and the memorial of the partial release of subdivider’s agreement. Please contact the Building and Zoning Department (473-7357) if you have any questions concerning the directives listed above. Prior to any site preparation, tree cutting, land alterations or construction, the Building Setback Area must be defined on the site with plastic or wooden snow fencing. This fencing must remain on the site until a representative of the Orono Building Department provides written confirmation that fencing mav be removed. ■1 r r HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET Attachment A Li Proposed Hardcover ~ a. House s • ^ • length width s.f. s.f. S m £ m s.f. b. Garage c. Driveway s.f. s.f. (include area within front setback area) s.f. d. Sidewalk s.f. X X s.f. s.f. e. Patio/ Deck/Pool/ Pond X X s.f. s.f. f. Landscape areas underlain with pervious or impervious sheeting/_ _ _ _ _ _ x _ _ _ _ fabric X s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. g. Other s.f. X X s.f. s.f. TOTAL HARDCOVER S.f. Lot Area s.f. « Building Pad Area - Building Setback Area s.f. s.f. Allowed Hardcover Building Pad Area s.f. X 80%s.f. 1 1 •d Attachment B REVIEW PROCEDURE FOR ALL APPLICANTS UNABLE TO MEET SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SUGAR WOODS PLAT All owners' or builders' seeking special consideration must submit a written request to the Zoning Administrator 7 days before the official Planning Commission meeting for the month (third Monday of the month). The City Council of Orono has approved an abbreviated review process for all such request whereby the Planning Commission shall assume the sole responsibility for the review and final recommendation regarding these special requests. Each applicant shall have the right of appeal before the Council of all decisions of the Planning Commission. All appeals to the Council shall be placed on the Council agendas for the following Monday (fourth Monday of the month). Applicants may find that the strict enforcement of these special requirements for residential development to not be practical nor functional when certain site conditions are found within a building lot. The following site conditions are listed below as examples to assist applicants in the preparation of their specific request: 1. the shape or limited area of a building envelope; 2. unique or mature trees within a building envelope or front/street setback area; 3. the topography of a building envelope; 4. desire to place house within a building pad so as to minimize impact on adjacent properties. All special requests shall consist either of one or more of the following submittals, depending upon the specific site conditions to be considered: 1. survey/site plan designating structures, pathways, drives and type of back out improvement; 2. inventory of hardcover (be sure to include all hardcover within front street/street setback area); 3. topographic mapping of property; 4. location of mature, unique tree specimens; 5. other unique physical characteristics of property that requires special placement of house/drive on site. 1 i r Jun ao OO 031eop Cr«l* Jonmm 0t/l«/00 14:01 FAX 0124400477 031-454-3330 rs€i p.K ttOOl HARDCOVER CALIHJLATIOM WORKSHEET <cmcu 031) O-TT 7»-2ir ISOStf MO-1003 ^.1 • 1•K '.•kiii RJNJCC k k k B. Qimo C. DrikcwiQr D. SUnvtlc nco m. F. X s B X k X X X « 5LO SJP. S3. S3. S3. .if?a __13. __S3. ^S3. _S3. __S3. _S.F. TOTAL BAKDCDVEK 13 2D3E A A * B B X 100 • X 100 - -f-en’-AL izse. B. OtfiB* C. OHvewky D. SMiwaSt E. PttialDock F. S3. S3. ss «.7i :aQ2^ A X TOTAL HAXOCOVEX IN ZONE SA IN - B 6371. S3. S3. S3. SF. S3. S3. S3. S3. S3. S3. A S3. B X 100 SIw ik • - *1 « 06/20/00 U-.28 TX/BX MO.1210 P.002 r 34-/lg- a3-& rft I—■ r *• c^lCC fxuTfXUCrr^i'^ mm :n: V . J* .V ' ’ ‘. •:t^. a:- • » # i:-. ■' •- A -<1 ■ • :t .. .% •• .........(\ n-x'. \ .-■* / .« ' • *■ '■• .VvfO *: : K wja 1 *a*4| •>»i / n • m •W• * 4 a A A X aC5), ^ , <d>y g (13) • i».or C30L 9D 3 P Ui t (12) IM s .tf*' (II) (10) na.ot *i. ij. 5 ff ^ 1^) »x 1 OL A ^'J (25) S »iX04 <Kk, i ncTTf- ^ . >W ^4 /• l».•AO 9 7'(>*n I*. ft/2 t> »N x« »«/ (48) a\» p = fc * 1 sg(36)-: (39) ;f 179 ITS as 110. It t J § ^ J"“U, » "• (40) = inS! 2II.«I " c»,-« * 1 •4AT M 1 *(»)« 8 , • iiis* ** (4f) *9 if«• «w «*(U)9 V S’lS(ij) ^ a*4“*'*-411 f ■ ■a a a ocm Niu no |0M^ 2600 / WAVZATA WIAA cm 2 WATCATOWN 3 •TH AVf N 800 RfLLET COUATII TClif. OICKCT 2\ J *1 OAMTA''-^s ~13 SUQAA- Long Sf* WOOON&VIN Oil lUI naafa* VK* oa lUM MAP IIO 0 thoaousmi IftniSSJ Df«nu IJ 10A6VICW CM k I *' u:.Bikini Oono «M DATE M/lA/tt DATCN M2 HENNErXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYMEH PROPERTY OMNERS LIST REPORT NO. PXA35401 PACE 17 OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO S4-110-2S 21 OtOO 02012 SUGARWOOO OR ANNE H DEOCEJO ANNE N DEOCEJO 2012 SUOARHOOD OR LONO LAKE NN 5SSS0 SO SA-110-2S 21 0010 02011 SUCARWOOD DR ROGER L KINO 0 JEAN L KING ROGER L KING 0 JEAN L KING 2011 SUGARWOOO DR LONO LAKE MN 55S50 SO S4-110-2S 21 0019 02101 SUGARWOOO OR RICNARO J 0 CONNIE L APPLE RICHARD J 0 CONNIE APPLE 2101 SUGARWOOO DR LONO LAKE NN 55SSO TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR SO S4-110*2S 21 0020 02100 SUGARWOOO M J P 0 K L SLANK JOHN P SLANK 2100 SUCARWOOD DR ORONO NN B53SA SO S4-110-2S 21 0021 02102 SUGARWOOO DR T N KXNHES t A E KIHMES TODD N A ANITA E KIHHES 2102 SUGARWOOD OR LONG LAKE MN 55S5A SO S4-110-2S 21 0022 02100 SUGARWOOO DR G Z GILL A F S GILL ORETCNEN Z A FRANCIS S GILL 2100 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN S53S0 TAXPAYER NANE/AOI 30 S0-11O-2S 21 0020 OOiSO ADDRESS UNASSICNED SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC SUGAR WOODS NONEONNERS ASSOC C/O RESERS CONSTRUCTION CO SB2S WESSTER AVE MPLS NN 55010 SO 30-110-2S 21 0029 OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSICNED SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC C/O RESERS CONSTRUCTION CO S525 WESSTER AVE MPLS MN 55010 SO S0>110-23 21 OOSO OOOSO ADDRESS UNASSICNED SUGAR WOODS HOHEOWNERS ASSOC SUGAR WOODS HOHEOWNERS ASSOC C/O RESERS CONSTRUCTION CO S525 WESSTER AVE MPLS NN 55010 PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ASOR SO S0-110-2S 22 0003 SS720 DICKEY LAKE DR N C 0 J A RADINTZ NENRY C RADINTZ 770 DECKEY LAKE DR LONG LAKE MN 55350 SO S0-110-2S 22 0017 02251 PINE RIDGE LA C S L OTTEN CLIFFORD I LOUISE OTTEN P 0 SOX 209 LONG LAKE MN 55350 TOTAL SATCN 502 00011 a I CERTIFY THAT THL FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESaiTATXON OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE REST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. •\k f i • • f i! • • I •• r«l .vCii; r ADDRKSS C^lO^ — Kpc PERMIT RECORD