Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-25-2000 Council PacketI- Public A ttendance Meeting D ate 12 CY □□□ COUNCIL PLANNING C ommission Park C ommission Other iSPiPA<ggtnt..-'’OtiTv-vi'tHE INFORMATION V •• ' REOUE^D BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER \C\^v'^A O » v/j^ C/-> v lC>\ -A/^C( f,___/^/f^11P 2.I (/V _ / 7. 8. 2 k’* 10.. 11. 12. 13.. 14. 15._ mtttu #• ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,2000 Cof ROLL <?/Tn The Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members pres^HH^yor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Charles Kelley, Barbara Peterson, Richard Flint, and Bob Sansevere. Representing staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffion, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Public Services Director Greg Gappa, and Recorder Alissa Wintemheimer. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA 7 V ^ . 1.Approve/Amend Items 6,7, 8,12,13,14, and 16 were added to the Consent Agenda. Peterson moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ’*'2. Regular Council Meeting of August 28,2000 Peterson moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of August 28,2000 as presented. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. RECOGNITION 3.Recognition of Officer Kurt Erickson—^Resolution No. 4517 Moorse stated that the City Council recently received copies of letters of commendation for outstanding service by the Orono Police Department, and in particular Officer Kurt Erickson, from Jerry Rockvam, Mayor of Spring Park, and Dawn Fitch, Loss Control Administrator for Presbyterian Homes on Lake Minnetonka. Moorse read the resolution that recognized Officer Kurt Erickson for commendations received from Presbyterian Homes on Lake Minnetonka and the Mayor of Spring Park where it was resolved that the Orono City Council hereby recognizes Officer Kurt Erickson for his outstanding service. * •h r.i. 'fU r i- L. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,2000 3.Recognition of Officer Kurt Erickson—Resolution No. 4517 —Continued Kelley moved, and Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4517 recognizing Officer Kurt Erickson for commendations received from Presbyterian Homes on Lake Minnetonka and the Mayor of Spring Park. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Mayor Jabbour thanked Officer Kurt Erickson for his dedicated service, and stated that the City Council appreciates the work done by the Orono Police Department. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS—ANDREW MCDERMOTT, REPRESENTATIVE Mr. McDermott stated that the Park Commission had an excellent park tour. All board members were present. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS None. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 4.#2550 Charles Van Eeckhout, 120 Brown Road South—Class III Subdivbion and Planned Residential Development Weinberger stated that the application is a 7-lot planned residential development request for property located immediately adjacent to the City of Long Lake. It has access via a driveway easement to the 20-acre parcel. Long Lake creek runs through the property and there are wetlands located on the property. The primary change in this proposal from previous ones is in the propert>’ access. The applicant has been unable to obtain an easement from the adjacent property owner to gain suitable access to the lots. The applicant is now seeking to gain access from the City of Long Lake via Apple Glen Road on the north side of the property. Staff has contacted the City of Long Lake. Long Lake has deferred consideration of the access request until after the City of Orono has taken action on the application. If Orono approves the ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,2000 l it >u 4.U2550 Charles Van Eeckhout, 120 Brown Road South—Class III Subdivision and Planned Residential Development—Continued application, they will then consider the proposed access to Apple Glen Road. Another issue facing the application is the delineation of wetlands on the property. Two areas previously delineated as wetland are now in question. If the areas are determined to be wetland, it would allow 13.7 acres of dry buildable with 6 lots. If the areas are determined to not be wetland, it would allow 14 acres of dry buildable with 7 lots. Mr. Van Eeckhout is in the process of having a wetland delineation report prepared that will be forwarded to the Watershed District for approval. The Planning Commission recommended denying the application because it was felt the 4 lots on the north side should be reduced in number, thereby increasing lot size, and beca use the wetland delineation was not complete. Staff recommended Council table the application and give the applicant direction regarding: access via Apple Glen Road vs. Brown Road, whether the new road would be public or private, and if the 4 nothem lots should be reduced in number. Mr. Van Eeckhout stated that the wetland survey has been completed and it shows 14 acres of dr>' buildable, sufficient for his planned development. Mayor Jabbour stated he is not comfortable approving the subdivision with access to Apple Glen Road without first hearing from Long Lake because it would burden Long Lake with extra traffic and sewer hookups. Flint asked if the current driveway could be used for lots 5 and 6, with Apple Glen Road accessing the other 5 lots. Mr. Van Eeckhout stated that may be an option, although he would prefer to access all of the lots from the same road. Flint stated that a letter from Svoboda Ecological Resources notes a change in wetland boundaries on the property due to the presence of sand and gravel fill. It also noted that an area recently became drier due to the presence of a drainage ditch. Mr. Van Eeckhout stated that drainage from Apple Glen Road runs into a ditch that was dug on the property in 1956. He has cleaned the ditch, removing silt, but he has never altered the land. He also stated that the Svoboda letter is referring to a deepening and straightening of the ditch which happened in conjunction with the sewer plant on Orono Orchard Road long before Van Eecl^out owned the property. At that time, they lowered the creek, leaving wetland soils in areas that no longer qualify as wetlands. Mayer Jabbour stated he is not in favor of any application that would affect Long Lake. Mr. Van Eeckhout stated that Long Lake will not move on access to Apple Glen Road without hearing from Orono. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,2000 4.U2550 Charles Van Eeckhoiit, 120 Brown Road South—Class III Subdivision and Planned Residential Development—Continued Kelley stated he would prefer 6 larger lots that all access Brown Road. Mayor Jabbour stated he prefers smaller lots to reserve more land for natural areas. Kelley stated he would not proceed on the application without having something in writing Irom the Watershed District. Sansevere stated he would not want access going through a neighborhood where it is not wanted. Van Eeckhout stated the City is responsible for getting him a road to access his property, and the City has the power to condemn a property to gain the road. Mayor Jabbour stated that they cannot approve the plan without having suitable access to the property because the Council w'ould then be forced to find the applicant access. He suggested staff draft a letter to Long Lake stating that Orono has considered the application and will approve the subdivision if Long Lake grants access from Apple Glen Road. The letter will make it clear that Orono is not in any way pressuring Long Lake to grant access, or trying to sway their decision. The application will be tabled to allow time to receive the Watershed District report and to hear from Long Lake on access. Kelley moved, and Sansevere seconded, to table the application and direct staff to write a letter to the Cit>' of Long Lake asking them to consider whether to allow access from Apple Glen Road. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ^'Fse i’p. 5.tt2596 Brenshell Homes, 1181 Wildhurst Trail—Class III Subdivision Preliminary Plat Approval Steve Benke was present. Weinberger stated that the application is for a 5-lot residential development on a 7-acre parcel located adjacent to the Saga Hill park area. Access is proposed from Garden Lane. He stated that new information was presented to staff on the afternoon of September 11, 2000. Mayor Jabbour moved, and Flint seconded, to deny the application. Mayor Jabbour stated that he spends the weekend studying the Council packet, and does not feel the Council should have to make a decision based on new material w ithout time to review it. Mr. Benke stated they were responding to a staff report that stemmed from a meeting held w ith the neighbors that neither he nor the property owner were invited to attend. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,2000 ii- 5.#2596 Brenshell Homes, 1181 Wildhurst Trail—Class 111 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Approval—Continued The surveyor was notified of the meeting, but was not the appropriate person to invite. Mr. Benke stated that he is listed as the contact person on the application. He stated that the new information was provided in response to a staff request. Mayor Jabbour stated that normally when new information is presented to the Council, they refer the application back to the Planning Commission for review. The application in front of Council should be denied. Mr. Benke stated that the new information simply demonstrated that the applicant was willing and able to comply with all of staff s requests. Mr. Tom Stokes, President of Brenshell Homes, stated that they were trying to respond to staff requests, and it would be appropriate for everyone to have an opportunity to review the new information. Mayor Jabbour stated that the Council should have the benefit of the opinions of the Planning Commission, staff, and neighbors before moving on the application, and that requires a certain process. Mr. Stokes suggested the application be tabled so they could incorporate the changes suggested by staff and go back to the Planning Commission. Barrett reminded Mr. Stokes that he had a right to a decision at the Council meeting, and that he would be waiving that right in order to extend the application deadline. Mr. Stokes asked if he could begin the process anew if the application was denied by Council. Barrett stated he would have to wait 6 months to resubmit the application. Mr. Stokes stated he preferred to table the application. He reviewed a letter to that effect and signed it. Mayor Jabbour withdrew hb motion, and Flint withdrew his second, to deny the application. Peterson moved, and Kelley seconded, to table the application and refer it back to the Planning Commission. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *6. #2606 Rick’s Super Value, 3333 Shoreline Drive—Commercial Site Plan Review and Variances—Resolution No. 4518 Peterson moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4518 granting variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.42, Subdivision 7(G); Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(L) and Section 10.61, Subdivision 10(0) and approves the issuance of a building permit for Rick’s Super Value for property located at 3333 Shoreline Drive per Municipal code Section 10.42, Subdivision 2 approving the commercial site plan, building elevations and landscape plan, and approving the a ■ I * *-T •It ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,2000 *6. U2606 Rick*s Super Value, 3333 Shoreline Drive—Commercial Site Plan Review and Variances—Resolution No. 4518—Continued variances as requested based on the unique findings and hardships noted in the resolution and approving the City^s issuing a building permit for the proposed additions. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Kelley stated that the Long Lake Fire Commission meeting was canceled. The committee is currently considering 2 parcels of land as sites for a new fire station: 1 on the southwest comer of Brown and Watertown in Orono, where 2 houses would have to be acquired; and 1 on the east side of Willow Road and Hackberry, where 1 house would have to be acquired. The consultant favored the site on Willow based on response time to calls. Both sites have quick North/South responses and are close to Long Lake ’s higher density areas. Sansevere suggested the City contact the property owners on the sites in question and inform them that their land is being considered for the fire station. Mayor Jabbour stated staff should contact the property owners and let them know that while their property is under consideration, the project is still in the preliminary stages. Mayor Jabbour stated that he is concerned people believe Mn/DOT will provide large amounts of funding for the station, and in reality, the project could be short of funding. Kelley and Peterson stated they fear the proposed fire station may be more than the City requires to meet its needs. Sansevere asked about the timeline for hiring a new police chief. Moorse stated the advertisements have been submitted to state and national publications. He expects the Council will be able to review candidates in mid-October, with a final decision made in early November. Sansevere suggested making the start date at the discretion of the new chief, allowing that person to start before or after the holidays. Mayor Jabbour announced he will not run for reelection as Mayor. His reasons for leaving have nothing to do with the possible consolidation of Orono and Long Lake. The Council members expressed their disappointment that he won’t be returning as Mayor, and their support for the work he has done for the City. Fp-j A ,%• ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,2000 PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT *7. No Parking Zone on Counfy Road 51—Resolution No. 4519 Peterson moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4519 directing Hennepin Count}' to install **No Parking Vehicles with Trailers, Tow Away Zone” signs on North Shore Drive, County Road 51 between the Noerenberg Bridge and Old Crystal Bay Road, County Road 84. : Ayes 5 Nays 0. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *8. Request for Payment #4 —2000 Lift Stations Project Peterson moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve Request for Payment #4,2000 Lift Stations Project to Ford Construction, Inc. in the amount of 566,953.05. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 9.Orono Schools Traffic Control on Old Crystal Bay Road Gappa stated that the high school now starts at 7:50 a.m. and the middle school starts at 8:00 a.m. so students can share buses. Because of buses, car poolers, and pedestrians crossing between the two schools, major traffic issues have arisen. Traffic was backed onto County Road 6 during the heaviest traffic. They placed a four-way stop at the south high school driveway and crosswalk, which seems to be working well to control traffic. One of the options discussed was adding a signal at the school crossing, but it is not warranted by the amount of traffic outside of school hours. Kelley stated he is not in favor of the four-way stop. The school district has had all summer to consider the traffic issue, and waited to find a solution until school started. Having a permanent stop is not acceptable when it is only needed during the hours of drop-off and pick-up. He suggested using lights that blink red in all four directions during peak hours, and blink yellow during off-hours. He also questioned if anyone had considered lighting the intersection. Children will be crossing the road in the early morning and evening hours in the winter when it will be dark outside. Flint stated he agreed with Kelley. Mayor Jabbour questioned the cost of adding a semaphore. Gappa stated the cost would be about $100,000. Gappa stated that installing a temporary stop sign for peak hours is not recommended because people would expect traffic along Old Ciy stal Bay Road to stop at all times and could cause accidents by pulling out of the parking lot in front of traffic. - »/ ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,2000 9.Orono Schools Traffic Control on Old Crystal Bay Road - Continued Kelley stated that the issue was not very well thought out, and the school district should consider solutions other than a four-way stop. Mayor Jabbour stated there would be no action taken on item 9. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 10.Comprehensive Plan—Preliminary' Approval—Resolution No. 4520 Gaffron stated the Planning Commission voted to adopt the Comprehensive Plan subject to the revisions noted: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. An index of acronyms. A table of reference materials cited in the body of the text. Municipal Code sections referred to in the text will be cited by number as well a title. The Plan will be bound in a 3-ring binder. A listing of Council and Commission members, staff and consultants. Where appropriate, certain words in the Plan will be modified to reduce the use of definite or absolute statements, or words where such terms might be considered confrontational or inflexible. However, these changes will only occur where softening of terms will not dilutethe City’s intent. Photos or illustrations will be added where they will contribute to the reader’s understanding. Council discussed Orono having urban and rural areas, and wanting to maintain that distinction between them. Higher density neighborhoods allow working professionals to live in Orono, people such as teachers, police, etc. Gaffron stated the City could place incentives and disincentives into the zoning code to help regulate home size. Mayor Jabbour thanked Gaffron for his hard work and service. Flint stated that language in the Plan should be changed to refer to all lakes in Orono, not just Lake Minnetonka. Flint moved, and Peterson seconded, to change references to Lake Minnetonka to lakes of the City. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Flint moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4520 granting preliminary' approval of the Orono 2000-2020 Community' Management Plan. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 8 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,2000 11.Adopt 2001 Tax Lev>’ and Budget—Resolutions No. 4521 and 4522 Moorse stated that the tax levy is proposed to increase by 3.38%. That combined with the tax capacity, which increased by 11.52%, means that the tax capacity rate is being reduced substantially from 14.8% to 13.7%. Kelley moved, and Flint seconded to adopt Resolutions No. 4521 adopting the proposed 2000 tax levy collectible in 2001. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 11.Adopt 2001 Tax Levy and Budget—Resolutions No. 4521 and 4522—Continued Kelley moved, and Flint seconded to adopt Resolutions No. 4522 adopting the proposed 2001 budget. V'ote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *12. Set Date for Truth in Taxation Hearing Peterson moved, and Sansevere seconded, to set the Initial Truth in Taxation public hearing for 7:00 p.m. Monday, December 4,2000 at the Orono Council Chambers, and to set the Continuation hearing, if required, for 7:00 p.m. Monday, December 11,2000 at the Orono Council Chambers. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *13. Set Date for Tax Rate Hearing Peterson moved, and Sansevere seconded, to set the public hearing regarding the City*s tax rate for 7:00 p.m. Monday, October 9,2000. *14. Appointment of Additional Election Judges for the 2000 Primary Election Resolution No. 4523 Peterson moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4523 appointing additional election judges for the Primary Ele''^ion to be held September 12,2000. 15.Establish Date and Time for Primary Election Canvassing Board Meeting Council decided the Primary Election Canvassing Board would meet on Thursday, September 14,2000 at 7:30 a.m. No motion was made. li * ■- i ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,2000 >■ I m IS n mmm ■■■% *16. Building Quality Communities^Resolution No. 4524 Peterson moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4524 declaring the City of Orono ’s commitment to join in the ^‘Minnesota Cities: Building Quality Communities ” statewide initiative. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT There was a report given after the Council meeting adjourned. *17. LICENSES None. *18. BILLS Peterson moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor r i •v; m L 3 ^Ot /^fr^ MINUTES OF THE CANVASSING BOARD MEETlN^p HELD SEPTEMBER 14,2000 AT 7:30 A.M.^5 200n ClTYoy ROLL The Council met as the Canvassing Board on the above date and time in the Orono Council Chambers. The following members were present: Mayor Jabbour, Council Members Richard Flint, Charles Kelley, Barbara Peterson and Bob Sansevere. The following represented City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse and City Clerk Lin Vee. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:32 a.m. Copies of the attached results of the September 12 Primary Election were distributed. Council Member Kelley moved, Council Member Peterson seconded, to certify the results of the September 12, 2000 municipal election as follows: QUESTION: Consolidation of the Cities of Long Lake and Orono Should the Cities of Long Lake and Orono be combined into one city effective January I, 2001, in accordance with "Plan for Merger and Implementation" dated May 25, 2000 which was approved by the city councils of Long Lake and Orono and which includes the adoption of a charter for the new city? Yes receiving No receiving 1,487 votes 349 votes Vote: 5 Ayes, 0 nays. ADJOURNMENT The Canvassing Board meeting adjourned at 7:34 a.m. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk PRIMARY FI.ECTION RESULTS - SEPTEMBER 12. 2000 __ ipcT PCX #2 PCT¥3 ■ ">Ctir4~ TOTALSOFFICE0 r. nF.MOCRATIC F.L. PARTY UNITED STATES SENATOR Gres? A. Iverson 1 0 0 1 2 Mark Dayton 90 74 lOI 165 430 Ole Savior 1 2 ..1 6 Mike Ciresi 65 .33 66 106 270 Jerry R. Janezich 29 -17 47 44 ' ■13-7 Hal Doriand 0 0 .'0 ••OS"0 Rebecca Yanisch 79 35 70 91 275 "Dick" Franson 0 0 1 1 2 1122 UNITED STATES REP. ( DIST 3) Darryl Tyree Stanton . ; ‘40 ^. 23 46 .73 v 182 Sue Shuff 140 96 .166 206 “■ r 608 790 Sandra Hunz •'154 175 239 568 568 STATE REP. (DISTRICT 34B) Dorothy Muffett 154 172 236 562 STATE SENATOR (DISTRICT 43) 562 Dale Neef STATE REP. (DISTRICT 43A) Marcia Eland riTV CONSOLIDATION Yes 372 198 373 544 1487 No 100 62 69 118 349 PRIMARY FT.FrTTON RESULTS - SEPTEMBER 12.JZ000 Bf.piTRI.irAN PARTY UNITED STATES SENATOR BUI Dahn 18 4 ’ 21 •21 64 Rod Grams 166 *'83 130 ■218 ■; -597 UNITED STATES REP. (DIST 3) 661 Jim Ramstad 178 85 145 1 234 642 STATE SENATOR (DISTRICT 34) 642 Gen Olson 173 143 1 • 226 V- .542 STATE REP. (DISTRICT 34B) 542 Jeff Johnson 165 138 227 •530 STATE SENATOR piSTRICT 43) 530 Richard (Dick) Campbell 37 37 Ed Oliver .:4s.' ■45 STATE REP. (DISTRICT 43A) 82 Tom Workman n -80 80 ('0]VSTITIITION PARTY UNITED STATES SENATOR 80 Derek Schramm 1 0 .;0 ■0 ; .1 David Swan \o ••0 0 0 0 UNITED STATES REP. (DIST 3) 1 AmeNiska _______________■1 ■0 i 0 1 yNnr.PENDENCE PARTY 1 UNITED STATES SENATOR Leslie Davis 0 2 0 U . f if 2 James (Jim) Gibson 4 . • 1 2 2 9 ^ Fred H. Askew __________________0 0 0 0 0 Buford Johnson 0 0 1 -1 2 fi OF REGISTERD VOTERS AT 7:00 A.M.1236 967 1294 1644 5141 H OF NEW VOTERS ELECTION DAY 41 21 32 44 138 a OF VOTERS AT POLLS 4'3 263 447 671 1859 »OF ABSENTEE BALLOTS___________23 3 12 19 57 VOTER TURNOUT %37.43^'o 26.62% L. BOARD MEMBERS Douglas E. Babcock Chair, Tonka Bay Bert Foster Vice Chair. Deephaven Eugene Partyka Secretary. Minnetrista Cra g Nelson Treasurer. Spring Park Andrea Ahrens Mound Bob Ambrose Wayzata Kent Dahlen Minnetonka Beach Craig Eggers Victoria Tom Gilman Excelsior Greg Krtchak Minnetonka L;li McMillan Orono Tom Skramstad Shorewood Herb J. Suerth Woodland Sheldon Wert Greenwood o L T 3c LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18330 MINNETONKA BLVD • DEEPHAVEN. MINNESOTA 55391 • TELEPHONE 612/745-0789 • FAX 612745 9085 Gregory S. Nybeck. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR September 12,2000 TO: FROM: LMCD Mayors and Council Members LMCD Member Cities LMCD Board of Directors Interested Parties Bert Foster, LMCD Vice Chairman Greg Nybeck, LMCD Executive Director S ep p 5 2000 ^/Vu 50% Rtr>ci#d 20% Pott Con«jm«f Watt# SUBJECT:Update on Proposal for Adding Two Water Patrol Deputies for 2001 Boating Season In the attached letter, dated 7/24/00, the LMCD brought to your attention a proposal for a way to increase Hennepin County Sheriff’s Water Patrol presence on Lake Minnetonka, for the 2001 boating season, by two full-time Deputies. We requested feedback from the LMCD member cities, by fi/15/00, on two questions relating to this proposal. These were: 1) whether the member cities would support an increase of Water Patrol presence for the 2001 boating season, and 2) whether the member cities would be willing to share in some of the costs for it. Overwhelmingly, the member cities have indicated that they support an increase in Water Patrol presence on Lake Minnetonka. Many cities indicated a willingness to share some of the cost and two cities had some concerns regarding cost sharing. The comments received from these two member cities included: 1) Lake Minnetonka is a regional amenity and that that increased presence of Water Patrol should be funded at Hennepin County level, and 2) there is a need to provide justification for increased Water Patrol presence on Lake Minnetonka. A meeting was held at the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Water Patrol Headquarters on Thursday, 8/24/00, to discuss the proposal, to review and address the feedback received from LMCD member cities, and to further define the details of the proposal. There was a wide range of local and regional representation at this meeting, including: •Hennepin County Commissioner Penny Steele •Tom Church, Principal Assistant to Hennepin County Commissioner Mary Tambomino •Orono Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Shorewood Mayor Woody Love, and Spring Park Mayor Jerry Rockvam •Four staff members of Hennepin County Sheriffs Office •Four staff members from LMCD member cities •LMCD Directors Foster and McMillan, and LMCD Executive Director Greg Nybeck After significant discussion, three key points were identified that justify the need for increased Water presence. They include: 1.A cultural change of boating activities on Lake Minnetonka. The boats are larger, are driven in a manner that make larger waves, and are sometimes driven by people who do not know the rules of the road and courteous operation. There seems to be an increase in aggressive operation on some boats of all sizes with a disregard for the law and their effect Web Page Address: http;//www.winlernet.com/-lmcd/ E-mail Address: lmcd@winternet.com LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT on Others. This cultural change has resulted in increased concerns by the public, including riparian owners and watercraft operators. This has resulted in a reduced quality of the experience of those that recreate on Lake Minnetonka. The group felt that this situation couid be improved by increased Water Patrol presence by having increased patrol hours. 2.Significantly reduce patrol hours due to increased complexity of processing violators. A BWI arrest, that used to take a Deputy off patrol for an hour to process the offender, now can take four to six hours. The increased processing time results from laws created to protect the rights of the public and has affected criminal investigations. Arrests on the water, which are more difficult than land, now take much more time, which results in fewer actual patrol hours. The end result is less visible presence of the Water Patrol on the Lake 3.The need to prepare for the Special Deputy litigation currently at the Minnesota State Supreme Court. Historically, the Water Patrol has supplemented their full-time, licensed Deputies with 30 volunteer special deputies. These special deputies man patrol boats, make stops, and issue tickets. They average approximately 250 hours of volunteer time per year; however, their authority to “investigate" has been challenged in court and is currently at the Minnesota Supreme Court. If the ruling goes against the Water Patrol, there will be a serious reduction in Water Patrol presence on the Lake. The group felt that the increase of two licensed paid Deputies would be at least some protection in the case of an adverse ruling. In the case of a favorable ruling, the two new deputies would have the needed effect of increased patrol hours. The group decided to try to establish a two-year funding commitment, for $100,000 per year, to be used exclusively for two additional Water Patrol Deputies to patrol Lake Minnetonka beginning in the 2001 boating season. None of these funds have been voted upon, but the proposed breakdown is as follows: •50% from Hennepin County. •30% from the LMCD Member Cities. •20% from the LMCD "Save the Lake" Fund (Private contributions resulting from LMCD solicitation letters). _ _ A I A/j The LMCD member cities would need to fund the proposed $30,000 through voluntary^ontribtrtiofts- for 2001 . For 2002, it could be funded either through voluntary contributions or by adjusting the LMCD levy to its member cities in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B.635. The increased levy would require adoption of a resolution by % of the member cities (11 of 14). Details of how much each member city would be levied, using the LMCD formula outlined in Minnesota Statutes 103B.635, is detailed in the attached spreadsheet. We are asking each city to add the amount shown on the attached spreadsheet to their 2001 budget. If the other sources of revenue do not become available, the LMCD will rethink the plan and be back to each group. Please feel free to call the LMCD Executive Director if you have questions. A LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2001 WATER PATROL PROPOSAL INCREASE MEMBER CITY LEVY ADJUSTMENTS . ^4+ CITY 1997 POPULATION ESTIMATES 1999 TAXABLE MARKET VALUE 1999 NET TAX CAPACITY EACH CITIES SHARE OF PROPOSED $30,000 ADDED WATER PATROL FOR 2001 PERCENT DOLLARS i- ■X DMphavtn ’ •; iri'' •';-•‘v-. ! •; ;■ 3,695 . • > 449,674,500 Excelsior 2,335 140,506,400 703 ■97,d65,800 Minnetonka 52,176 4,392,492,000 574 102,974:600: Minnetrista 4,000 458,062,900minima:!?.’ ■514:586,400 Orono m 7,671 1,018,521,300 ifliwoa-‘1 ■ MIT"676;S45>M ■ Spring Park 1,831 82,949,600 fptiia WT/f -1^ V i;488 T”” '^"’iSeMioo Victoria 3,616 293,500,300 Woodland 498 116,595,600 — ••'T T* 1 6,895,119 2,416,997 1,520,312 84,744,523 1,630,381 6,704,659 7,145,622 15,777,690 10,218,346 I, 582,437 3,001,106 4,302,369 II, 563,812 1,834,386 «•»'a- '7.4% 2.6% 1.6% 20.0% 1.7% $2,217.13 $791.66 T : : $488.86 •w -.»f. ~t* ll r i I *. ■ * y * T4*,—r*rrTT* V* i $6,000.00 $62ir25 $2,155.89 . T-.*- I .♦ 7.2% 7.7%. 16.9%$5,073.33 11.0%•" $3i285;72 . i- '": 1.7%$508.83 4.6%$1,383.43 ) I T* *I*T^;< • r ' ■ U'» •*12!4%" 2.0% ,t*. $589.85 98,345 9,143,387,600 159,382,759 100.0%$30,000.00 PW Mhnesola Statute 103B.631, no dly may pay more than 20% of the total levy. The City of Minnetonka vwukJ pay a constant 20% of any amounts to be levied. Remaining dttes taclor for determining levy amounts is computed as: (City Net Tax Capadty/(Total Net Tax Capacity - Minnetonka Net Tax Capacity)) * 80% Total Net Tax Capacity Less Mtenetonka Net Tax Capacity Net Tax Capacity for remaining 13 cities $159,382,759 ($84,744,523) $74,638,236 Example: Deephaven: $6,895,119 /$74,638,236 X .80 (80%) = 7.4% share of $30,000 = $2,217.13 b : . !! ,._ .. ,....-1 ... Ill, 3 4000 • I Jl 1 •.•. , .. -"C i • -e=:�J,,&'"J . l"j� •• a . � . ,v ,:!II ''!Jr! :1 .,--t 1 ��I ... {_... • ...._. ---.. r.&A! E 2aoo F 2400 G 2000 H tOf!A -I '; I " / �--.. eoo <-:c:::: Jr --6. 1200 7 1600 8 2000 9 2400 • /./ •• 10 2800 • . / .,.✓ 11 1600 I 1200 J SOC> K 400 L .3200 0 Orono, Minnesota � .•.. ! 1�· Eh�-S!� ...lllad!!'!J:n01tf, ----,ering Index Map . . ••• ....... -0 0 0 N Cl) w � « Cl) 0 tC(0 u.. ..J 0.. _. --' o 0 o� «c 0.. �u.. c:( 0 0.. UJ rt,IJI IIVISIR• ••• II. ■IO IPT.-.,-·'"· 7, ... o ,,, ...... -----.UC ..... , AN., .... ..... -..._ .... , ....... ..... ., .... � "'"' •· .L l. ,.· ,�,, .. •. . . . t· r ··. I . . .. � .. . -.. -,. ·• .. .., . . . . . �· . .•. ·-..... ,. f.· , .. •.·1. • :. r·.... ,.-. .. • •· t � · 1�:. • ,,, :·· L..,_ • f:... t•----; • --...... L...-. �-L..� . . r--"' ... t·· -·- -!, "" t· � 1,:.. CO � g � -Ct M M ;.- • t� InCl') . . . ·c, ME . M � co .cD • � • � • • • CO ·O • . • • CO --· O It) • ...,_ ICD CO . CO ,_ a, ,._ ·•O�ln1 M •iMGO •-.... = --� --§-•t. --It); -· .. � Na, 0 -· o·N O � M:,._ N � .:_ CO i• N It) � � �,-. -� � --. � t· � . � ;-•-.,. :• ;. ; �• •. ••r j .,1.•; �-� p•.• . - - r i!: r ... .. . .I_- I . . . I 0 0 0 0 o_ 0 M � .... . . AGENDA FOR COUNCIL l\rEETING SET FOR l\lONDAY, SI ORONO COUNClL CHA.1'\IBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARK\V. (•) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upo1 under the Consent Item• on the agenda. ?,.lemos regarding each of th Public Packet -located on the counter near the si�p�t.lf;JI_ MEEROLL CALL CO�SE1''T AGEi''DA 1.Approve/ AmendAPPROVAL OF i\lli'l.JTIS SEP 2 5 2tCt I Y u,-0Ho,•2. Regular Council 'Nleeting of September 11, 2000•3. Canv:issing Board ?-.!eeting of September 14, 2000PARK CO'.\ThllSSION CO:\�lEi''TS LAKE i\lTh"i''"ETO�KA CO:"\SERVATIO;-.i DISTRICT-Lili Mc" PLA.t'\�l�G CO;\l;\flSSJO:--; CO;\C\lEi'iTS -Liz Ha\'<n, Represent PUBLIC CO'.\l;\lE1''TS • (Limit 5 i\linutes Per Person) ZO�I�G AD;\-IDJSTRA TOR'S REPORT 4.#2596 Bren.shell tlomes, 1181 \Vildhurst Trail -\\'ithdrawal cPlat Application •5. #2613 James and Debra Renckens, 3020 \Vaterto\vn Road·•6. #2618 John \Valker, 1368 North Arm Drive -Variance -R�so7.i\1arina Licenses i\l<\ YOR/COUl'iCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 8.l\avarre Parking Lot Paving9.Request for Payment �l -East Long Lake.'Fox Ridge Sewer I CITY AD;\llNlSTR'-\. TOR'S REPORT l 0. Scheduling of Council \Vork Session1 l. CITY ATTOR.i'fEY'S REPORT •12. LICEi'iSES •13. BILLS UPCOMING ISSUES A.l'i'"D EVENTS � 09/25 -Council �lee:ing, 7:00 p.m. 10/02 -Park Commission Meeting, 7:15 p.m. 10/06 -Absentee Ballots for General Election Avrulable at City Offo 10/09 -Council McctiQg, 7:00 p.m. 10/16-Planning Commission Meeting, 6:30p.m. 10/23 -Council l\itccting. 7:00 p.m. Application Date: Application Deadline: 5/17/00 11/11/00 COiiMr.ii MFETiNG SEP 2 5 2000 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ClIY or onONO DATE: September 19,2000 ITEM NO.:^ Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger title Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2596 Brenshell Homes 1181 Wildhurst Trail Class III Subdivision Planning Commission Comments: The Planning Commission voted 4 to 3 to recommend approval of the request by Brenshell Homes for a 5 lot plat of property located at 1181 Wildhurst Trail. It was the majority opinion ofthe Planning Commission the proposed subdivision meets the requirements of the Zoning Code. The Planning Commission did have concerns with the amount of information regarding environmental impacts of developing the property. The areas on proposed Lots 2 and 5 near the ravines is primarily the concern regarding potential erosion concerns and the ability for the stormwater management ponds. In response to concerns addressed by the City, they had revised the plan to better protect these areas. This included relocating the pond on Lot 2 about 40' to require less grading in the area near the drainage ravine. The trees at the edge of the ravine would be protected. The property line between Lots 2 and 3 has be i shifted to the north and the road length shortened to bring the building areas of the lots to the top of the hill and to increase the buffer area to the ravine. The Planning Commission had a failed motion to table the application (3 to 4) to request additional review of the impacts of the development and to allow the MC WD an opportunity to review the wetland delineation for the property. The developer had hired Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company to complete a review of the wetlands and determined the NWl map does not indicate wetlands on the site. They also completed a site inspection and found no hydrophytic plant communities, wetland hydrology, or hydric soil indicators. Kjolhaug noted in their letter, dated September 15,2000, "There are no areas on the Wildhurst Site meeting wetland criteria. The neighborhood group had provided a report that was completed in 1997 that found a small area of wetland on proposed Lot I. The MCWD has visited the site and will make a determination on the reports completed on the property. Attached is a copy of the Staff Report that was presented to the Planning Commission on September 18,2000 for review. Council Action Requested Motion to direct Staff to draft a resolution based on the plan dated September 1 2,2000 attached to this memo as Exhibit A. Application Date: 6/21/00 Deadline:11/11/00 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:September 14,2000 SUBJECT:#2596 Brenshell Homes 1181 Wildhurst Trail Class 111 Preliminary Subdivision - 5 lots Zoning:LR-IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 Acre Minimum lot size Application:Five lot subdivision of a 7 acre site Construction of Garden Lane and New Road List of Exhibits: A Revised Site Plans B City Engineer Comments C June 19,2000 Planning Commission Minutes D Staff Report (6/15/00) Application Deadline: Brenshell Homes has agreed to extend the application deadline to November 11,2000. Application Review: Brenshell Homes has proposed a 5 lot subdivision of a 7 acre parcel located at 1181 Wildhurst Trail. Access is proposed from Garden Lane, which is a platted right-of-way that is undeveloped. Garden Lane would connect Tonkaview Lane to Outlot A. The road is proposed as a public road to the end of the cul-de-sac. All lots would be connected to sewer and be served with private wells. Sewer is available in Wildhurst Trail and would need to be extended between Lots 2 and 3 to the new road. The 5 proposed lots would average approximately one acre in size. Lots 2 and 3, located at the end of the cul-de-sac, do not have the required lot width for new lots in the zoning district. They would require variances for lot width. Council Action and Plan Revisions: The City Council reviewed this item on September 11, 2000 and voted unanimously to return the request by Brenshell Homes to the Planning Commission due to revisions in the Plan. Staff had made recommendations to the developer regarding the proposed locations of the houses on Lots 2 and 3. The developer has responded and relocated the common property line 20' to the north. Hf2596 Brenshell Homes 1181 Wildhum Trait Subdivision Page I i Secondly, the cul-de-sac has been shortened 40'. This allows the building sites for lots 2 and 3 to be located closer to the top of the hill and where the land is flatter allowing for a more usable back yard. The primary reason for relocating the building sites was the ravine located along the south property line of Lot 2. The developer has created a drainage swale behind the building pads on Lots 2 and 3 to redirect stormwater runoff from the houses to the storm water pond on Lot 1. In a letter, dated September 11, 2000, by Barr Engineering (consultant hired by a group of neighborhood residents) it was noted there are several maple trees located at the west end of the ravine that should be protected. In response to the concerns addressed by the neighborhood, the developer has relocated the stormwater pond to the west to protect any mature vegetation around the ravine. The following is a list of concerns the developers were provided with regarding the original plan. Many of the concerns have been addressed by the plan revisions submitted by Mark Gronberg, Coffin & Gronberg, dated September 12,2000. 1. 2. 3. 4. The property has a number of sensitive natural features that should be protected and managed when the property develops. The northerly ravine, proposed as Outlot A, would be protected by placing a conservation easement over that area. Proposed Lot 2 is proposed to include some regrading to help redirect storm water to the NURP pond located on Lot 5. Some of the grading is in the proximity of a drainage ravine located along the south property line of Lot 2. Staff has discussed this issue with the developer and recommended the common property line between Lots 2 and 3 be shifted to the north to allow the building site for Lot 2 to move awav from the drainaee area and ravine. (Plans have now been submitted) All drainage off the structures that would be located on Lots 2 and 3 should be redirected towards the cul-de-sac where the drainage would enter the storm sewer and flow towards the northern NURP pond. The concern is drainage from the structures would be concentrated towards Wildhurst and could impact the stability of the slope and drainage towards the lots east of Wildhurst Trail. Protection of the wooded areas along Wildhurst and protection of the ravines would be accomplished through the granting of conservation easements over those areas. A conservation easement would be granted over the east half of Lots 2 and 3 to protect those areas from removal of vegetation and land alteration. Additional easements would protect the two drainage ravines. The proposed grading plan reduces the existing drainage area to the southerly ravine by about 2.5 acres. Storm sewer will redirect this drainage area to the north pond where the gradient is half as steep as the south ravine. The City Engineer has reviewed the drainage calculations #2596 Brenshell Homes 1181 Wildhurst Trail Subdivision Page 2 ■■V 5. and commented they appear acceptable. Both ponds reduce the off-site flow rates compared to pre-development conditions. The City is strongly recommending the developer not disturb the trees and.grades east of the cul-de-sac along Wildhurst Trail. The portions of the sewer that would be installed between Lots 2 and 3 and along Wildhurst shall be directionally bored to prevent any disturbance to the steep slopes. Sewer Service: Sewer Service is available in Wildhurst Trail. The main line would be extended in Wildhurst to a point between Lots 2 and 3. A utility easement 20' wide shall be granted between lots 2 and 3 from Wildhurst Trail to the cul-de-sac and standard utility easements shall be granted over Outlot B to allow extension of service to Garden Lane. The developer shall be responsible for construction the service out to Garden Lane. The portions of the sewer that would be installed between Lots 2 and 3 and along Wildhurst shall be directionally bored to prevent any disturbance to the natural grades and not require removal of mature vegetation on the slope. Boring under Wildhurst would also eliminate the need to temporarily close access to properties north of the proposed improvements. Options for Action: 1.Recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Lot Width variances be approved for Lots 2 and 3. Drainage and utility easements be dedicated on the flnal plat 10' along exterior property lines and 5' along interior property lines, stormwater detention ponds located on lots I and S. Drainage easements shall be dedicated for the lower ravine located on Lot 2 and a conservation and flowage easement shall be dedicated over the south portion of Lot 2 to ensure the higher elevations of the ravine are also protected. A conservation easement be placed over Outlot A to protect the ravine from any land alteration and vegetation removal and over the east side of Lots 2 and 3. Utility installation shall require directional bored lines under Wildhurst Trail and between Lots 2 and 3. Subdivider shall satisfy all concerns and requirements noted in the letter dated August 15, 2000 by Tom Kellogg, City Engineer. P 3.Recommend denial, stating reasons. 4.Table for additional information. 5.Other action. #2596 Brenshcll Homes 1181 Wildhurst Trail Subdivision Page 3 preliminary plat PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR BRENSHELL HOMES OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1. HEATHERCROFT HENNEPW COUNTY. MINNESOTA -'‘Jy---o------- "vV t-. I T77^, ■i-yk. .-7 ..........•• .V-.......,\ \ / //•••••■ ..........--.A . 'V • . • •,* V ....--------------------------------- \ \ *••/••• \/ / • rl.«* ---------- -----------------A- R D V. N >*"V .....................................c----------------------""••............... ............................................••...........•.. .............................. 4—^ pM'r-*-- — Vi—r ---------------------rV'T • , isi II ik !;3j|ri:>l . j PREUMlNARY GRADING. DRAINAGE it UTILITY PLAN PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR BRENSHELL HOMES OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1. HZATHERCROFT hennepw county . Minnesota SCALE TOf>OCR«mV taken rHOM orono gty maps POSSBLE„HOUSE SITE '4 . / ^ ..............• ' .-V' . •• •• U «( i«l ...V > \ If 4^^ ......... L,:J^gE /'^-SSfl j \ ' i: * ■ ffi ■' icip; -Sa-i=i |Ob *' cer lo2“ 15 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene Ande rlik & |\J I Associates Engineers & Architects August 15,2000 Mr. Paul Weinberger Zoning Administrator/Planner City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Re: Brenshell Homes 6-Lot Subdivision @ Garden Lane BRA File No. 139-2596 Bonestroo. Poiene. Anderlik and Associates. Inc. Is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opporlunicy Employer and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G Bonestroo, PE • Marvin L Sorvaia. PE • Gienr ? Cook. PE • Robert G Schunichf. PE • Jerry A Bourdcn. PE Senior Consultants: RoOert W Rosene PE • Joseph C Anderfik. PE • Richard E Turner. PE • Susan .M, E&ertin. C PA. Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PE • Keith A Gordon. PE . Robert R. Pfef.'erle. PE • Richard W Poster. PE • David O Loskota. PE • Robert C Russek. A i A. • Mark A Hanson. PE • K* chaei T Rautmann. PE • Ted K Field PE • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R Rolfs. PE. • David A. Bonestroo. MBA* Sidney P W.itiamson PE. L S • Agnes M Rmg. MBA* Allan Rick Sc^*- Offices: St Paul. St. Cloud Rochester and Wiiimar. MN • Milwaukee. Wl M^bsite: wwwbcnestroo com r:. PE Dear Paul: We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed six-lot subdivision for Brenshell Homes. The site is located east of Garden Lane and west of Wildhurst Trail in the west half of Section 7. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1.Utilities: The proposed sanitary sewer installation raises some concerns. Sewer is proposed to be installed in an existing steep slope between Lots 2 and 3 and also down the center of Wildhurst Trail. Disturbance of the steep slope is a serious erosion concern. Installation of the sewer in Wildhurst Trail will require the removal of the entire driving surface making through traffic difficult if not impossible. We strongly recommend that the portions of the sewer between Lots 2 and 3 and the segment along Wildhurst Trail be directionally bored to prevent disturbance to the steep slopes and allow for through traffic during construction. Final plans should include plan and profile views of the sanitary sewer. Record plans should be provided to the City upon project completion. City standard details should be included in the plan set. 2.Streets: Plans should include a typical street section. A geotechnical analysis, R-value recommendation and pavement design calculations should be submitted for review. It appears that the street will be an urban section with curb and gutter. All curb and gutter shall be concrete, no bituminous curb is allowed. The fire chief should review and comment on the proposed hammer handle tum-around on Garden Lane. The chief should also look at the proposed driveway alignment to serve Lot 5. Recent discussions with local firefighters indicate that long curving driveways can be an obstacle for fire trucks. The City should review and determine whether Garden Lane should be constructed further to the north to provide access the Saga Hill Park. 3.Grading and Drainage: The proposed grading plan reduces the existing contributing drainage area to the southerly ravine by about 2.5 acres. Storm sewer will redirect this drainage area to the northerly ravine where the gradient is half as steep as the south ravine. This is consistent with our previous comments. The developer ’s drainage calculations appear acceptable. Both ponds reduce the off-site flows compared to predevelopment conditions. Both ponds should have outlet structures constructed to City standards that provide skimming to the 100-year storm event. Storm sewer design and calculations should be provided for review. Final plans should be submitted to the Minnesota DNR and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their review and approval. 4.Easements: Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5-feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10-feet wide along roadway right-of-ways. Drainage easements should be provided 2335 West Hlqhwav 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 1: across all drainage ways and ponding areas. It appears that the purpose of Outlot A is to protect the ravine. The southeasterly boundary of Outlot A does not include the southerly end of the ravine. The southeasterly boundary of Outlot A should be moved southerly to tie into the 1020 contour along the west lot line of Lot 5 so that all of the ravine is included within Outlot A. 5.Financial Guarantee; When the plans have been completed we will prepare an estimate of the total cost for the site improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required. Please contact me at (651) 604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENb. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono 4 i ■c ____CONSERVATION EASEMENT ............ .. .. P'S -L-0 H..U I . 'V ::t. ir' •-- f DRAINAGE EASEMENT (DEDICATED ON FINAL PLAT) DRAINAGE EASEMENT (DEDICATED ON FINAL PLAT) CONSERVATION EASEMENT SEP 07 2000 09!24 FR BPRR ENGINEERING 952 832 2601 TO 92494616 Barr Engineering Company 4700 West 77th Street • Minneapolis. MN 55435-4803 Phone: 952-832-2600 • Fax: 952-832-2601 P.02/03 BARR Minneapolis. MN • Hibblng. MN • Duluth. MN • Ann Arbor. Ml • Jefferson City. MO September 7,2000 Mr. Mike Gaffroa City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN SS323 Re: Brenahell Homes Development Proposal Dear Mr. Gaffron: At the request of Mr. Gary Welsh and other concerned citizens of Orono, Barr Engineering Company is providing additional information for your consideration in evaluating the proposed Brenshell Homes proposed subdivision. On September 6,2000, we inspected the proposed development site to further evaluate the potential for erosion and dnunage problems as a result of the development. We observed numerous, large, healthy maple trees within and surrounding the entire ravine in the southeast comer of the development parcel. It appears that some of these trees would be removed in order to construct the southernmost pond. Currently, these trees provide a number of benefits in protecting the ravine including: 1.The complete canopy over the area reduces the erosive potential of raindrops by interception, 2.The trees help promote infiltration and reduce surface nmoff by keeping the soil porous (widi macropores created by roots and soil organisms), 3.Trees have high evapotranspiration rates which reduces soil water content between rainfall events and provides more storage for rainfall and lessens runoff, and 4.The expansive root systems provide stability to the soils and slopes to prevent slope failure. Once these large trees are removed and their root systems begin to decay, the stability of the slopes will decrease and the lack of protective cover may increase the raindrop erosion potential and surface runoff resulting in increased erosion, formation of gullies, and sediment transport to Forest Lake. As we discussed yesterday, the home locations on Lots 2 and 3 are shown within or immediately adjacent to 18% slopes with no useable, flat back yard areas. The proximity of these house pads on the steep slopes raises serious erosion concerns due to roof runoff; the additional grading that is expected to create small, useable back yards; and establishment of turf which generally results in increased runoff over native vegetation. It would be helpful to stake the limits of the proposed pond on Lot 1 and the bouse pad areas on Lots 2 and 3 in order to properly evaluate the potenti'^l for natural resource damages. We encourage that you walk the site to more closely evaluate the issues discussed at our meeting yesterday. If if'' SEP 07 2000 09:25 FR BflRR ENGINEERING 952 832 2601 TO 92494616 P.03>^ Mr. MlkeGifflron September T, 20(X P»gei______ If you have any questions, please call me at (952) 832-2764, Sincerely, Mark Jacobson Environmental Scientist c:Ron Moorse Paul Weinberger OregCjappa Gary Welsh M- 1 2000 16:33 FR BRRR ENGINEERING 952 832 2601 TO 92494616 Barr Engineering Company 4700 West 77th Street • Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 Phone: 952-832-2600 • Fax: 952-832-2601 P.02/03 BARR Minneapolis. MN • Hibbing. MN • Duluth. MN • Ann Arbor. Ml • Jefferson City. MO September 11,2000 r 5* t*/.r: Mr. Paul Weinberger City of Orono 2750 KeUey Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Brenahtll Homes Development Proposal Dear Mr. Weinberger; meeting. Based on our latest review, we continue to have concerns regardmg the steep slopes and wetland losses. St60p Slopes and Erosion Concerns The revised development plans include a rcconfigiiration of the lot line between Lots 2 and 3 and a minor reduction in the cul-de-sac length as recommended by city staff. However, Ae plans do not adequately protect the slopes and ravine from erosion due to concentrated ^off from the backs and sides of the homes. Unfortunately, approximately onc-half of the house pad on Lot 2 ud ^ approximately one-sixth of the house pad on Lot 3 lie within areas defined as steep slopes (8*0P« sfeeper than 12%). The current plans have not altered the dr^age to ensure does not cause erosion in the south ravine and on the steep slopes leadmg to Wildhurst Trail. The south stormwater pond is also planned for construction within the south ravine in are^ cu^ntly containine slopes steeper than 18 percent. The construction of the south pond would req^e *e removal of numerous large maple trees which are currenUy providing stability in the ravme. The steep slopes on Lots 2 and 3 are currently protected from erosion by: 1 The full tree and shrub canopy which intercepts rainfall, maintains a more permeable soil structure and wicks away moisture from within the soUs by evapotranspirarion. and 2 The natural surface roughness and small depressional areas in the upstream dr^nage area slows any runoff that does occur so runoff within the ravine is spread out and maintained at lower rates. As the city staff recommended at our meeting on September 6,2000, a conservation easement should be provided over the steeper slopes on Lots 2 and 3 to protect the existing vegetative coirer and around elevations. The pond would also create a new slope into the ravine which would be s^per Uian 20 percent. Constructing the pond within a flatter area would eliminate smaller trees and create less of an erosion concern. r i ►' K' V. h. f C SEP 11 2000 16:33 FR BflRR ENGINEERING 952 832 2601 TO 92494616 P.03^3 Mt. Mike Oiffroti September I li 20W Pi|e2________ Wetland Loisee _ .. u A final issue that should be considered is the elimination of weUands on the prop^ which were deh^eated and surveyed in 1997. Although not direcUy regulated by city code (T>pB 1 wetlmds), the fillini or draining of wetlands is regulated by the Wetland Conservation Act as ^immsiered by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the discharge of dredge or fiU material into weUands is gulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. At this time, it is not clear that the applicant will b able to meet the wetland permitting and mitigation requirements If you have any q;oestions, please call me at (952) 832-2764 Sincerely, Mark Jacobson Environmental Scientist c:Ron Mooise MikeOafixon Oreg Cappa Gary Welsh r r, f I < L Table 1 Chapter 10 Orono Municipal Code Brenshell Homes Development, City Zoning LR*1B Page Issue Conforms Does Not Conform 259-1.03 Driveways shall be at least 10 feet Lots 1-4 probably Lot 5 shows a proposed driveway from side or rear lot lines of adjacent lot will closer than 10 feet to Lot 1 and lot to east 255-3-256. Subd. 14 Yards and open space: Each lot needs to be able to have at least 1.500 sq. ft of lot coverage by principal residence and garage structures Total footprint cannot exceed 15% of lot area Yes Yes 285 Lot Area (1 ac w/o ROW)Yes 285 Lot Width (140*)Possibly Lots 2 and 3 are very near minimum 285 Front Yard (35’)Yes 285 Side Yard Adjacent to Another Lot (10') Yes 285 Rear Yard (30')Yes 285 Side Yard Adjacent to Street (35‘)Yes 365.Subd. 8 No grading within WCA area No According to preliminary plat of 8/97, there is a wetland in the current Lot 1. The current grading plan would eliminate/regrade the area to be about 2 feet lower. 374, Subd. 25,6 No variance will be granted for not preserving wetlands No See aboye. 376, #24 Shoreland - This site is within 1000' of the OHW of Forest Lake 376-9. Subd. 14 DNR Notification - must notify the ONR 10 days prior to all public hearings Not sure Not sure 376-11. C2 Bluff Setbacks Probably for Lots 1 and 4 Lots 2,3, and 5 (if inteipreting code correctly) 376-13. G Steep Slopes Not sure Not sure 376-2. 3 Bluff Impact Zone - if interpreting code correctiy, this site has three, in Lots 2.3. and 5 376-12. 3 Bluff Impact Zone -no structure can be placed within zone Lots 2 and 5 (if interpreting code correctly) 376-14,1 Vegetation Alterations within Bluff Impact Zone - no live tree 6* in diameter or more at 3* above ground may be removed without a permit from City Not sure Not sure. Must replace with same number suitable to staff at same setback from shoreline. 376-16, g Steep slopes - must be reviewed by City engineer Not sure Not sure 376-16. h No fill or excavation in Bluff Impact Zone Stormwater pond and house pad grading of Lots 1. 2 and 5 within zone 376-17. K5 New stormwater outfalls No Skimming devices should be shown 376-17. K2 Minimize runoff potential and erosion potential Steep pipe outlet will create high velocities. No protected pond overflow on Lots 2 & 5 with small orifice prone to plugging provides potential for erosion and failure of berms. 376-13G If areas indicated are not bluffs then they and more areas are steep slopes. No soils information has been provided. . I- f £ VJ.r % 7' •'• Table 2 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Brenshell Homes Development Rule N (subdivision with density less than 2 units/acre - needs to conform to BMPs) Minimum proposed opening 2 feet or more above 100*year flood level Structural BMPs Non-structural BMPs Temporary Project Conforms Yes Silt fence is shown. Project Does Not Conform The east pond should probably be moved to the west to avoid negative characteristic impacts to the ravine. Skimmers should be installed at pond outlets. Riprap at pond outlets should be sized appropriately. The 4" orifice Is likely to plug. An emergency overflow should be provided so that the dike does not collapse. A revised structure is suggested for the 7.5% slope of the outlet for the east pond to reduce flow velocities. The design does not incorporate other BMPs. Eliminates wetland in Lot 1. No information provided on other BMPs. A rock filter dike is probably more appropriate in the channel of Lot 2. No rock entrance/exit is shown. . % Table 2 (continued) Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Wood fiber blanket should be used on slopes 3H;1V or steeper. D (wetland protection) According to 8/97 information there is a 1,043 square foot wetland on Lot 1. Another wetland was located west of the current site. A third wetland was located in Outlet A. No Impact Elimination of wetland in Lot 1 does not conform to MCWD policies. It requires avoidance and/or replacement. No replacement plan is shown. Buffers For Outlet A, probably yes. See above. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 21,2000 tiimuneeting the 15 percent limit and having the porch be practical. Kluth cohunented he is particularly sensitive as it relates to structural coverage on lake lots due to The impact tnhthardcover and structural coverages have on the area lakes. Doleman inquired\^ther a reduction in hardcover would help the lake. Hawn stated a reductioiNi hardcover does lessen the impact to the lake, but that the Planning Commission does not generafl^rade hardcover for structural coverage. Hawn indicated the Planning Commission encourages the reduction in hardcover whenever possible. Lindquist stated he concurs with Hawn. Stoddard stated this is a dififtcult application to^prove since the Planning Commission normally does not grant structural coverage variances unlcs^^ardship is demonstrated. Stoddard indicated the Planning Commission is a recommending body to tn^ity Council and that the City Council may or may not approve this application. Lindquist stated the Planning Commission can either table it to allo\the Applicant time to revise the plans or vote on the application tonight. Doleman requested the Planning Commission vote on his application tonight. Lindquist moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend denial of Application ^2605, aphn Doleman, 1680 Shadywood Road, based on the proposed structurai coverage excee< percent limit and no hardship being demonstrated. VOTE: Ayes 6, .\a>s 0. SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS (#4) #2596 BRENSHELL HOMES, 1181WILDHURST TRAIL, PROPOSED FIVE LOT SUBDIVISION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF GARDEN LANE AS A PUBLIC ROAD, 8:00 p.m. - 9:37 p.m. Steve Behnke, Brenshell Homes, was present. PAGE 17 -9 — MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 21,2000 The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Weinberger stated the Planning Commission had reviewed this application at their June meeting, which consists of developing a seven acre site located on Wildhurst Trail. The Applicant has revised his plans and is now proposing access via Garden Lane. The previous proposal had shown six lots, with some issues relating to drivew’ay access to the property and drainage concerns. The Applicant has reduced the number of lots to five in response to the concerns of the Planning Commission as well as addressed the issues relating to grading and drainage. Weinberger stated in response to the concern about protection of the ravines and controlled water runoff to properties east of Wildhurst Trail, the Applicants have revised the grading plan and addressed the issues by directing drainage to two stormwater management ponds. l*hc City Engineer has reviewed the grading and drainage plan and has determined the drainage has been preliminarily approved. Both of the proposed ponds will reduce the amount of water nmoff to what actually exists today as well as providing skimming to allow the water to be treated prior to leaving the site. Weinberger noted this plan would also be subject to review and approval by the DNR and the Minnehaha Watershed District. Secondly, the issue relating to street access has been addressed by revising the plan to make a 90 degree controlled intersection with Garden Lane. The northerly ravine in tltis development would be protected by a conservation easement and a lot has been removed that would have required access around the ravine. Weinberger stated the number of proposed lots has been reduced from six to five based on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, which has resulted in each lot meeting or exceeding the one acre minimum lot size. Weinberger stated City Staff is strongly recommending the developer not disturb the trees and grades east of the cul-de-sac along Wildhurst Trail. The portion of the sewer that would be PAGE 18 T\ r . MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COM^«SSION MEETING AUGUST 21,2000 installed would be installed between Lots 2 and 3 and along Wildhurst shall be directionally bored to prevent any disturbance to the steep slopes, which would eliminate the need to close access to properties north of the proposed improvements. Lot width variances are required for Lots 2 and 3. The LR*IB zoning district requires a minimum lot width of 140’. Both lots have approximately 120’ of width at the required structure setback. Weinberger indicated the City of Orono has approved lot width variances for lots which front on a cul-de*sac that demonstrate suitable building sites and meet the minimum lot size requirement. Weinberger stated the City’s Comprehensive Plan suggests properties within urban density and urban services be served by a public road. Staff recommends the new roads to this development be public, with the cul-de-sac provid' ..g an emergency turn-around. City Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat subject to the follov.v-.ig conditions: 1.Lot >vidth variances be approved for Lots 2 and 3. 2.Drainage and utility easements be dedicated on the final plat 10 feet along exterior property lines and five feet along interior property lines, stormwater detention ponds located on Lots 1 and 5. 3.Drainage easements shall be dedicated for the lower ravine located on Lot 2. 4.A conservation easement be placed over Outlet A to protect the ravine from any land alteration and vegetation removal. 5.Utility installation shall require directional bored lines under Wildhurst Trail and between Lots 2 and 3. 6.The subdivider shall satisfy all concerns and requirements noted in the letter dated August 15,2000, by Tom Kellogg, City Engineer. Behnke stated following the last meeting after a request was made to table the application, a PAGE 19 K-. , ^ /.r a NHNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 21,2000 discussion was held with a number of the residents in the lobby of City Hall. The residents expressed three major issues; one, a desire for no development; Wvo, improve the runoff; and three, less density. Behnke stated given those concerns expressed by the residents and the concerns of the City Staff and Planning Commission, they have revised their plans to meet as many of those concerns as possible. Behnke stated in discussions with the City Engineer, recommendations were made to redirect the water runoff from this site, which has been resulted in a reduction of the water flow leaving the site near the south ravine of 91.5 percent. Behnke stated in a 100 year flood, tlie normal flow would be seven cubic feet per minute to .6 cubic feet per minute, or a reduction of 91.5 percent. Behnke stated the ponding near the north ravine has resulted in the water ninoff remaining the same as what currently exists now. Behnke stated he is in agreement that the roads should be public to this development. Behnke stated he does not have a problem with the conservation easement for Outlet A. Behnke noted they have Just received Staff s report today, and in discussing the sew er with the directional boring contractor, Behnke noted they are in agreement with Staff s recommendation, which will result in a much lesser impact on Wildhurst. Behnke indicated tlie residents along Wildhurst will still experience some road construction for a one or day in this area even with the directional borings. Behnke noted all proposed lots for this development do now meet the one acre dry buildable minimum, with the reduction in the number of lots resulting in a much better development overall, Kathleen O’Kasper, 1067 Linden Avenue, stated over the years she has followed Stokes’ developments, noting the building permits on some of his developments have been issued to a PAGE 20 ■';-v MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 21,2000 i‘» ■ I >!■* t. company called Fine Line Design. O’Kasper stated she contacted the Commerce Department who indicated they do not have a license for Brenshell Homes on file, which means Brenshell Homes is not a licensed builder. O’Kasper stated the license for Fine Line Design has expired. O’Kasper commented since she was unable to find an office for Brenshell Homes, she has concerns that the City of Orono may be getting involved with a builder who cannot perform. Behnke commented in his view the issue raised by O’Kasper does not have any bearing on the plat that is before the Planning Commission tonight, noting that developers do not need to be licensed. Behnke stated the land developer on this particular development is Brenshell Homes, and that he is the owner of Fine Line Design. Behnke stated he was contacted approximately one week ago by the Commerce Department that there was a problem with his license. Behnke stated the license is issued in his name and not Tom Stokes’, with the office being located in the City of Burnsville. Behnke stated the issue with his license is that his check went imcashed by the Commerce Department and his license was not extended. The Commerce Department has indicated they have had a number of problems with licenses during this period of time. Behnke stated he is continuing to work with the Commerce Department to correct tliis problem. Sandra Hollenhorst, 1200 Wildhurst Trail, commented in her view no variances should be granted on this development. Hollenhorst stated since this is a very fragile area, the Cit>‘ should take extra steps to insure that what is being proposed will not damage the area. Hollenhorst expressed concerns that if the vegetation is damaged in this area, it will result in another ravine. Hollenhorst inquired what the environmental impacts are when directional boring is done. Weinberger stated the directional boring is being done to protect the slope, with a tunnel being bored underneath the ground in order to allow an extension of the sew er system. Weinberger stated if the sewer line were installed the standard way, the contractor would need to dig trenches in which to place the lines in, which would disturb the topsoil. PAGE 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CONEVnSSION MEETING AUGUST 21,2000 Gary Welsh, 1214 Wildhurst Trail, stated he did speak with the developer on this application, noting he was to be the contact person for the neighborhood. Welsh indicated he has not been contacted by the developer or any of his representatives following the last public hearing, and in his view the developer has not made any effort to work with the neighbors as requested by the Planning Commission. Welsh stated in his view* variances should not be granted on a development in order to allow higher density. Hawn indicated two variances are being requested by the developer on this application, which are normal when a house is located on a cul-de-sac. tc >■ : T 0*Kasper indicated she had some additional questions regarding licensing. Hawn stated that is not an issue before the Planning Commission tonight, and suggested City Staff check into the matter. Sandra Rasmussen, 1186 Wildhurst Trail, expressed concerns regarding the current sewer capacity, and requested that the current capacity be evaluated to insure that this development will not create additional problems in this area. Rasmussen also requested the developer be required to provide sufficient security on this project to insure completion or restoration of the area. Rasmussen stated she has a concern regarding the steep grade of the road, noting she presently experiences erosion of her driveway every time it rains. Rasmussen indicated she did speak with the developer about the possibility of relocating this road. Rasmussen stated she also has a concern with the fact that variances are being requested on this development given the situation with the cul-de-sac and the steep road. Rasmussen commented the cul-de-sac should not be constructed if it is going to compound the problem. Behnke indicated the water flow will be altered so that all water runoff goes to the north, to the holding pond, and through an outlet pond. Behnke stated the City Engineer has reviewed and approved the grading and drainage plans on this development. Rasmussen stated she would like to sec some type of assurance in the event the drainage does PAGE 22 *'+ •• Si NHNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 21,2000 not work the way the developer is proposing and that the project is completed in accordance with the plans ^proved by the City. Weinberger indicated a letter of credit is required on this project, with the plans on this project being required to meet certain standards of the City. Weinberger indicated the project would be inspected periodically by the City Engineer to insure compliance with the final plans. Weinberger stated the developer is also required to enter into a development agreement, which mandates that certain conditions are met on the project. Berg commented that the City does not release any funds on the letter of credit until an inspection has been completed by the City Engineer to insure proper compliance with the approved plans. Hawn commented the Plaiming Commission needs to rely on the advice of their e.\perts in determining whether the drainage for this area is appropriate and proper in controlling the water runoff. Stoddard requested City Staff review further any possible impact to the bluff in this area. Weinberger conunented City Staff has reviewed that issue, with the determination being made that the bluff should not be negatively impacted. Behnke indicated the bluflf in this area does not meet the necessary criteria to be considered an actual bluff. Stoddard stated he would like City Staff to review this issue again. Hawn commented the Planning Commission and City Council are required to act in accordance with the City’s ordinances. Hawn indicated the proposed plan does meet the City’s criteria, with the developer having the right to develop the land regardless of the desires of the adjoining property owners. Hawn stated it is the responsibility of the City Engineer and City Staff to insure that these issues are being addressed properly. PAGE 23 I MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 21,2000 Tom Stokes, Brenshell Homes, stated he is the o%vner of Brenshell Homes, which is a development company and not a building company. Stokes stated he has personally spoken wth the Commerce Department, who has indicated they are responsible for the license not being issued. Stokes stated the property owner requested them to develop this property, which is his right, and they are attempting to resolve all the issues involved with this project in accordance with the City’s ordinances. Stokes stated Charles Cudd Homes will be constructing the homes on this site, who is a very reputable builder. Stokes stated in his vie^v this will be a very nice project once completed, with extra care being taken to meet all the concerns expressed by the residents and City Staff. Stokes requested they be treated as any other developer within the City, noting the State Bank of Long Lake w ill be funding this project. Nygard requested Weinberger address the issue of the holding ponds and the value thes’ play in drainage. Weinberger stated the developer will be NURF ponds, which are designed to be sedimentation ponds. Weinberger stated t!as type of pond is generally required in most developments, w ith the ponds actually treating the water prior to it leaving the pond so it is cleaner than when it entered the pond. Stoddard requested the developer to keep the neighbors informed on the progress of this developm»;nt, noting the members of the Planning Commission typically don’t receive their packets until Thursday or Friday of the week prior. Stoddard stated Bonestroo is a large reputable consulting firm and will help to insure that the final plans are being complied with. Stoddard commented he does have a concern with the impact to the bluff, and repeated his request of City Staff to review the impact to the bluff in this area. PAGE 24 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 21,2000 mn Stoddard commented the Planning Commission is required to look at each application on their own basis, and requested City Staff look further at the impact this development will have on the surrounding area. Lindquist commented it is the responsibility of the Planning Commission to insure that the rights of the residents and the developers are preserved. Lindquist indicated the proposed plan does meet the City’s Comprehensive Plan, with the property ouner having the right to develop this property. Lindquist stated he would be in favor of this proposal since it does meet the City’s standards. Hawn indicated she is in agreement with Lindquist. Nygard commented variances are based on a hardship inherent to the land, and in his view a hardship does exist in this case. Hawn stated outside of those two variances being requested, this p oposal does meet all the City’s requirements. Hawn stated in her opinion she does not see a rea«:^.j not to approv e the preliminary plat. * • John Durm, 1131 Wildhurst, commented since engineering is not an e.xact science, he would like to see additional steps taken to insure proper grading and drainage for this development. Dunn requested he be provided with any new information the developer may have on this development. Stokes indicated they would be happy to cooperate with the neighbors. Lindquist moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend approval of Application U2596, Brenshell Homes, 1181 Wildhurst Trail, subject to the six conditions outlined in the August 17,2000 Planner’s Report, with the added condition that >. trees be retained on all slopes cn the east portion of Lots 2 and 3. VOTE: Ayes 5, N^ry: i,*‘«^ddard Opposed. Stoddard stated he voted in opposition to the motion because he feels there should be further research done on the impact to the bluff in this area. Stoddard stated in his opinion tire Public Works Director and City Staff should review the adjoining area to determine the impacts of this PAGE 25 8 '7 Vv i t tui r iv. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 21,2000 development. (Recess taken from 9:38 p.m. - 9:45 p.m.) (#8) #2606 RICHARD BLOOMQUIST, 3333 SHORELINE DRIVE, VARIANCES AND COMMERQAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, 9:45 p.m. - 10:10 p.m. Richard Bloomquist, Applicant, Vi-as present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting approval of a commercial site plan and variances for building additions to the existing supermarket totaling approximately 4,740 square feet. Variances are needed for hardcover in the 500-1000’ setback, street and side lot line setbacks, and parking. The proposed additions would provide additional retail space, warehouse/cooler areas, parcel pick-up, and an employee break room. The use of the property would not change. Weinberger indicated the City Council did adopt a resolution in 1997, approving variances to permit additions to the building that increased the size of the structure. However, the additions have not been constructed and the one year time period has expired, requiring a new land use application. Weinberger stated the gross leasable area for the B-3 Zoning District shall not e.xceed 28 percent of the total land area of the lot. Weinberger indicated this lot consists of 2.85 acres, and with the proposed additions, the gross leasable area would cover 22.2 percent of the total land area of the Lot. Weinberger stated there are no proposed changes to the parking, with a variance being approved in 1988 for a 0’ parking setback. The side yard adjacent to street variance was approved in 1991 for a ten foot parking setback, no change being proposed. The Applicant has requested structural PAGE 26 ,.i TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:August 17,2000 SUBJECT:#2596 Brenshell Homes 1181 Wildhurst Trail Class III Preliminary Subdivision - 6 lots Public Hearing Zoning:LR-IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 Acre Minimum lot size Application: Five lot subdivision of a 7 acre site Construction of Garden Lane and New Road List of Exhibits: A B C D Revised Site Plan City Engineer Comments June 19,2000 Planning Commission Minutes Staff Report (6/15/00) Application Review: Several major concerns were addressed by Staff, Planning Commission and Public at the Public Hearing on June 19,2000. The following concerns were addressed by the applicant. 1 Pipage The primary concerns were about protection of the ravines and controlled water runoff to properties east of Wildhurst Trail. The applicants have revised the grading plan and addressed the issues by directing drainage to two stormwater management ponds. Tom Kellogg, City Engineer, has reviewed the grading and drainage plan and has determined the drainage has been preliminarily approved. Street The street alignment has been revised to make the 90 degree intersection with Garden Lane. 1 Conservation The northerly ravine would be protected by a conser\'ation easement. A lot Easement has been removed that would have required access around the ravine. Lot area One lot has been removed based on the Planning Commission Variances recommendation that density variances would not be approved. The total lots proposed would be 5 lots. Each meeting or exceeding the 1 acre minimum lot size. /=• 5. 6. Erosion Control Lot Width Variances The City is strongly recommending the developer not disturb the trees and grades east of the cul-de-sac along Wildhurst Trail. The portions of the sewer that would be installed between Lots 2 and 3 and along Wildhurst shall be directionally bored to prevent any disturbance to the steep slopes. Boring under Wildhurst would eliminate the need to close access to properties north of the proposed improvements. Wildhurst is the only access to the northerly lots. Proposed Lots 2 and 3 would require lot width variances. The LR-1B zoning district requires a minimum lot width of 140'. Both lots have approximately 120' of width at the required structure setback. The City of Orono has approved lot width variances for lots which front on a cul-de-sac that demonstrate suitable building sites and meet the minimum lot size requirement. Public vs. Private Road The Comprehensive Plan suggests properties within urban density and urban services to be ser\'ed by a public road. Staff recommends the new roads should be public. The cul-de-sac would provide an emergency turn around. Also snow plows could use the turn around after plowing Garden Lane. Staff Recommendation The proposed plat meets the requirements as set by the Subdivision Ordinance. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed preliminary plat conditioned upon: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Lot Width variances be approved for Lots 2 and 3. Drainage and utility easements be dedicated on the final plat 1 O' along exterior property lines and 5' along interior property lines, stormwater detention ponds located on lots 1 and 5. Drainage easements shall be dedicated for the lower ravine located on Lot 2. A conservation easement be placed over Outlot A to protect the ravine from any land alteration and vegetation removal. Utility installation shall require directional bored lines under Wildhurst Trail and between Lots 2 and 3. Subdivider shall satisfy all concerns and requirements noted in the letter dated August 15, 2000 by Tom Kellogg, City Engineer. Options for Action ; 1.Recommend approval. 3.Recommend denial, stating reasons, 4.Table for additional information. 5.Other action. I t .’vj .l 'U-0 0 ^ B • 11 • Bonestroo9Rosene �Anderlik& 1 \J 1 Associates ----- Engineers & Architects August 15. 2000 Mr. Paul Weinberger Zoning Admini trator/Planner City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Bonestroo, Rosene. Ander l k and Anoe at�s. I '1c. II an IHI rmath,e A,c on/Equ I Oppottun ty Employer and Employee Owned Prfnclpals: Otto G Bone, oo. PE • rv,n Sor I . PE • Gle Coo· . PE • Robert G Sc un1chr. PE • /err A Bovrd PE Sen,or Consultants: Robe t Ros,ne. PE • Jose h C An err, . PE • 1c. rd E urn,r. PE • Sus"n . EbtrOn. C PA A:uocfate Prine pats: Ho rd A. S ntord. PE • K , h Go don . PE • r? err R. P ef erle. PE • Richard \JI Foster. PE • 0 Id 0. LOS 0 1 [ • PE • RoDert C. Rus ek. A I.A • rk A. H nson. PE • 1cha,1 autm�nn. P.E • ed Fl Id. P£ • e n t p A d�rson. PE. • d . Ro lfs. PE • 0 V d A. Bon nroo. � 8 A • Stdney p 1ll1 . ton. PE. ls • A5n .s ,'w R1 g. . -=· PE Off c�s: St. Paul. St Clo d. Rochesc r nd W1llm r. , •11 u � . WI \JVebsUe: vww bo uroo.com Re: Brenshell Homes 6-Lot Subdivision @ Garden Lane BRA File No. 39•2596 Dear Paul: We have reviewed the preli1ninary pl t for the proposed six-lot subdivision for Brenshell Homes. The site is loca ed east of Garden Lane and west of Wildhurst Trail in the west half of Section 7. We have the fol O\Ving comments in regards to engineering matters. 1.Utilities: The proposed sanitary sewer installation raises some concerns. Sewer is proposed to be installed in an existing steep slope b t,veen Lots 2 and 3 and also do,vn the center of Wildhurst Tra · 1. Disturbance of the st ep slope is a serious erosion concern. Installation of the sewer in Wildhur. t Trail \v· ll requir the removal of the entire driving surface making through traffic difficult if not impossib e. We strong y recommend that the portions of the sewer between Lots 2 and 3 and the segment along Wildhurst Trail be directionally bored to prevent disturbance to the steep lopes and allow for through traffic during construction. Final plans shou d include plan and profi e views of t·h sanitary sewer. Record p ans should b pro ided to the City upon project completion. City tandard d ails should be included in the plan set. 2.Streets: Plans should include a typical street sec ion. A geotechnica analysis. R-value recommendation and pavement design calculations should be submitted for revie\v. It appears tha the street will be an urban section with curb and gutter. All curb and gutter shall be concrete, no bitunlinous c rb i� allo\ved .. The fire chief should review and cornment on the proposed hammer handle tum-around on Garden ane. The chief should also look at the proposed driveway alignment to serve Lot 5. Recent discussions with local firefighters indicate that long c rving driveways can be nn obstacle for fire trucks. The City should review and determin \vheth r Garden ane should be constructed further to he north to provide access the Saga Hill Park... J.Grading and Drainage: The proposed grading plan reduces he existing contributing drainage area to the souther y ravine hy about 2 .5 acres. Storm SC\ er will redirect th· s drainaoe area to the northerly ravine \vhere the adi nt i .. half as steep as th south ravine. This is consistent with our previous comment . The developer• s drainage calculations appear acceptable. Both ponds red ce th off-site flo\v ompared to predevelopment conditions. Both ponds should h ve outlet structur construct d to City standards that provide kimming to the I 00-year storm event. Storm sewer design and cal cu lat ions should b provided for rev1e\v. Final plan should be submitted to th Minn ota D R and the Minnehaha Cre k Wat rshed District for their review and appro al. 4.Easements: Dr in and utility eas m nt hou d b provided 5-feet Vlid a on all interior lot li e-and I o.fi et wid alono roadway ri ht-of-way . Drainage easement hould b p o id d 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 5511 • 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 across all drainage ways and ponding areas. It appears that the purpose of Outlot A is protect the :-avine. The southeasterlv boundary of Outlot A does not inc ude the southerly end of the ravine. The southeasterly boundary of Outlot A should be moved southerly to tie ·nto the 1020 contour along the west lot line of Lot 5 so that all of the ravine is included within Outlot A. 5.Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we wil� prepare an estimate of the tota cost for the s·te impr'lvements to detennine the amount of the financial guarantee required. Please contact me at (651) 604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matt Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. bm,1.--' Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gapp� City of Orono �11NUTES OF THE OR O O PLANNING COl"I IISSIO JUNE 19, 2000 A�tES JOHNSO , CO TI�UED) an easemen ver the wetlands, \\·hich ,vas thought to be the shortest, most log· cal way to access the par e �. Ga on commented the ru. es and regulations concerning \Vetlands at the present ime are muc s ricter, "th the Applicants needing to get their approval prior to final plat approval. Gaffron stated the City ould perhaps have held oft'grant1ng the driveway permit until the other approvals l ·ere obtained. Bottenberg noted for the record the O\\ll the property to the north this development. a letter has been received from the S\1.'iontko\ skis indicating they would like to see as many trees saved as pos ible with Johnson comme ted he has a problem ,vith c dif on number fc .. contai ned in the Planner's Report, noting the agencies are unid ntified and t the f me period of open-ended. Lindquist stated if the Planning Commission appro es is application, it \viii be subject to the condif ons contained in the Planner's Report. Lindquist s d City Staff ,viii be able to provide the Applicant ,vith a list of the appropriate agencies to contact. · dquist noted the Applicant \vill need to obtain those approvals prior to this application being approve y the City Council. Johnso indicated the rest of the conditions are acceptable. Lindquist moved, Smith econded, to recommend approval Applicati #2594, James R. Johuson, 2240 Fox Street, Class II Subdivision, subject to Condill 1 - 7 contained ·n the Planner's Report dated J·une ·9, 2000, with the ap provals rel ·ng to the wetland being obtained prior to City Council approval of this application. VOTE: Ayes 4, N·ays 0. (#6) #2596 BRENSHELL HO�·IES, 1181 \VILDHURST TRAIL -PROPOSED SIX LOT SUBDIVISIO WITH DEVELOPI\'IENT OF GARDEN LANE AS A PUBLIC ROAD, 9:10 p.m. -10:02 p.m. Steve B hnke, Br ·shell Homes, ,vas present. The C rtificat of �1ailing and Affidavit of Publication \\'ere no ed. Weinberg r stat d the Applicant as s.ubmitted a preliminary plat application for a six lot sub I ision of appro. im at y seven acres of land ocated at 1181 Wildhurst Trail. The lots '"·ould have access fro·m Gard_ n Lane, ,,·hich is a platted but undeveloped street. Garden Lan e vou d connec. Tortkavic,,, Lane to Outlot A. Th road is proposed as a public road to the cul-de-sac. The proposed access from Tonkavie\v eliminates a number of problems'\: ith the propo�al '"·ith the sketch plan re iew. The Gard n Lane access ,,ri 1 eliminate drive\\·ays to ildhurst thus protecf ng th trees along Wildhurst Trail and controlling stom\\\'ater runoff on sit·. PAGE 19 C l\llNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING C0:\1 IISSIO JU, E 19, 2000 (#2596 BRE SHELL J.10 IES, CO Tl UED) Weinberger stated the six proposed lots y.·ou d average approxima te! one acre in site, with all lots being coMected to se\ er and served \vith private ,-.·ells. Se,ver is current!�· ·: '1able in Wildhurst Trail and would need to be ext nded bet,\'een Lots 2 and 3 to then .. •� . � Weinberger indicat ed Lots 2 and 3, located at the end of the cul-de-sac, do not have the required lot width for ne,v lots in this zoning district and ,vould require variances for lot width. Lot 5 does not have the required frontage a ong the proposed road and ,vould require a variance as the "·idth of the lot is narro\ver adJacent to Outlot A than Garden Lane. Garden Lane \-..·ould only be developed to the intersection th Outlot A and ,\·ould become a public r d. Weinberger stated Lot 1 is proposed at 1.03 acres, but does not account for land area dedicated for the NURP pond, v.·ith the City not crediting builclable area for land that i I be used as a drainagewa y or for storage of stornl\vater. Weinberger noted a ariance ,-.·ould be required for lot area. Weinberger stated Lots 2 and 3 \\'Ould require lot \\idth varianc es since they are less than the 140 feet requir d width at the rear of the front yard setback. Both lots are considered to be through lots since hey, ould have access to the ne" ro and are adjacent to Wil dhurt Trail. Weinberger stated Lot 4 ,vould b a conforming lot and does have a buildable area that ,vout be suitable for residential construct" on. Lo 5 \vould have app.roximatelv 90 feet of frontage along the front propert) line,, ith no direct ace ss be in available from Garden Lane. \Veinberger stated Lot 6 cont"ins a major ravine, ,,·hich is sho\vn on the preliminary drawings as a drainag� easement. City Code requires properties served by municipal sanitary se� er, the minimum lot area may be d'vided b> Flood Fringe lands provided at least on half acre of land not \ ithin the protected area is included 1n one contiguous parce · and both municipal se\ver and legal access is available to that building sit \Vithout encroachment on the protected area.. According to the proposed p1an, the dri e,vay access ,vould impact the southern edg of the ravine. Weinberger noted th City En · neer is revie\ving this driv e\,·ay location for Lo 6, \'.it h on-site grading and drair,age plans needing to be ""ubm1tted to the rvtCWD for revie\v. Weinberger stated access to Lot 6 ·s not possible \\'ithout impacting the ravine. Weinberger stated athe road and most of the lots ,vii drain O\\·ards the NURP pond depic vd on Lot 1, ,vith the pond draining to the ravine along th south lot line of Lot 2. Staff has a concern about the drainage being di ertcd into on location before it drains to the eas side ofWildhurst Trail, ,.,;th the City Engineer recommending that all drainage be diverted to t l north from the pond and int the r�vine ocated in Lot 6, ,,·ith some fofTll of \vater r tention dO\\·nstream before it ent rs e inneto ka. we· nbcrger stat d addit;oral inform tion r glrding the drainage will nc. d to b submitted to the City Engineer for his reviC\\' and appro al. \V inberger stated the Park Commissio, ,viii need to f'i vie,v this application as it relates to the issue of park dedic at·on. This property is ocated across an undeveloped ro d from the Saga Hill Park and provides th· Cit · of Orono ,·ith an opportunity to d t rmin if a land d dication ,,,o Id be apJJropriat to protect th ra inc. PAGE 20 �ll UTES OF THE ORO O PLA I�G CO�l�IISSIO JUNE 19, 2000 (#2596 BRENSHELL HO IES, CONTI UED) City Staff is recommending this application be tabled until the next Planning Commission meeting in order to 3i e the Applicant time to resolve some of thes issu s. Steve Behnke stated he has a number of questions relating to the issues raised in the Planner's report. Behrlce stated currently in his vie"· Gard n Lane as being r quired because of Lot 64, ,1-·hich is the lot to the north being a potential public access to a private lot. Behnke stated in his opinion Lot 1 does sho,v over one-half acre dry buildab le outside of the NURP pond, with the engineer for this development calculating h\'O thirds dry buildable on this lot. Lots 2 and 3, lot v/dth variances ,vould not be nece sary since at Wildhurst Trail the lots are 224' and 153', and if measured along the setback, there is th potential that they are less than 140', , are obviously greater in wi . c1cross the northern section. Behnke po inted out both lots \vill be ocated on a cul-de-sac. Hehnke stated it , .. -as on the recommendation of City Staff that this plan took the approach from OarC: .. r.· Lane. Lot 4 also contains enough frontage along Garden Lane and \\·ould not need a . vanance. B!·hnke ackno\vledged that there are issues relating to grading and drainage concerning this property, \\"r1ch ,vii need to be addressed further. B hnke stated it is his opinion that Lot 6 and the ravine ha e been addressed. Behnke noted they ha· e adopted the DNR 's definition of a bluff as e method of determining the top of the ravine. The top of the ravine does not extend to Garden Lane and ends prior to i ) and because of that, the acreage on both sid s is being incorporated into the dry bui dable cres. B hnke stated the dri e,\'ay does not impact the ravine proper as de·fined b · the bluff definition. Behnke stat d Lot 6 co nsists of approximately 1.25 acr sin size, and they \\'Ou ld be able to manipulate the lot r ne if n essary. Behnke commented the current division of \\'at r bet\\' en the north and south is ssentially equi alent to ,,·hat it ,vas prior to this plan b ing created� \\'ith this d�velopment not increasing the , ·ater runoff. Behnke stated the intention of the NURP pond is to hold the , ater to allow it to drain to the ravine at the same rate that it is currentlv. Behnke stated the ,vat r that drains to this property offsite is also included in the URP pond proposed for Lot 1. Behnke stated the comment by the City Engineer that all drainag be directed to the north is opposite the natural d. r ction of the ,\·ater. Behnke stated in his vie,v there e some inaccuracies i the statements by the it · Engi nccr. Behn e stated ·n his opinion he should not be responsible to extend Garden Lane to the north as part of this project since they arc off site. Bchnk indicat d th y are in agreem . t ,vith th standard easements and that Outlot A should be a public ri · t-of-,vay \,·ith he road being a public road due to the number of houses that ,vi II be serviced by · t. Behnke stat d th y "·ill continue to ,,·ork \\'ith City St ff on these issues. Behnk no ted the proposed drainag for this d. · lopm nt is design -1 to keep the \\·ater runoff at the sam r t as ,,·hat curr ntly exists n the rav · e. \ · c :1berg r stated re a dies of th on -half a r dry con iguous, th se lots are located \vithin the or.. \,,;re zoni.ng di trict ands 111 quir th on acr. dry bu:ld bl r gardless of being separated b a drainage area. \ inber er stat d Lo t 6 doc me t this r q irem nt ,, ·rh Lot l being less than one PAGE 21 E? MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 19, 2000 (W596 BRENSHELL HOMES, CONTINUED) acre in size due to the location of a NURP pond on that lot. Weinberger stated Lots 2 and 3 do front on a cul-de-sac, \sith Staff measuring the lot width from the setback from the cul-de-sac. The frontage along Wildhurst would technically require a variance. Weinberger stated as it relates to the drainage, the comment from the City Engineer were based on the information provided b .he Applicant. The City Engineer has not commented on the new information submitted. Wei..berger stated the concern initially was that all of this drainage was going to one location. Gary Welsh, 1214 Wildhurst Trail, stated he lives east of the proposed development. Welsh stated the ravine that runs on the south side is actually the ravine that runs through their property, noting he is well aware of the drainage that runs through the ravine. Welsh inquired whether this was a situation where the rules will be bent by granting the variances to allow the e.xtra density and have an adverse impact on the area due to the added hardcover and increased runoff. Welsh commented tliat perhaps more water needs to be held on the property' in order to address the drainage issues. Mike Hollenhorst, 1200 Wildhurst, stated in his opinion due to the number of variances required on this development, the application should be denied. Hollenhorst indicated they live downhill from Lots 2 and 3, with the construction as a result of this development causing the entire roadway and driveway to be blocked while the sewer line is being extended. Hollenhorst requested that the Planning Commission require a substantial bond on this project to enable the City to restore the land back to its original state should the developer go bankrupt on this project. Sandy Robinson, Wildhurst Trail, expressed concerns relating to the proposed density and drainage. Robinson stated in her view the City should not permit a developer to push the amount of lots that can be developed in this area. Robinson -tated in her opinion three lots would be acceptable in this area. Robinson commented the depth of the ravine in the area should give a clear indication to the Planning Commission of the power of the runoff in that area, and that ample steps need to be taken in order to guarantee proper drainage from this development. Michael Wear, 1184 Wildhurst, commented in his view the developer has a right to develop this property if he so chooses, with the City having the right and the obligation to place sufficient conditions upon the developer to insure proper compliance with City Codes and adequate drainage. Wear stated in his view this area needs to be developed with the issues in mind, especially in light of the drainage that flows through this area. Wear stated the current condition of the ravine is not very attractive due to the number of dow ned trees and debris within the ravine. Wear suggested the developer revise his plans to work with the runoff and the other issues and reappear before the Plaruiing Commission. Robert Birkeland, 1298 Wildhurst Trail, stated when this area experienced a 12 inch rain, the ravine looked like the Missippissi River under the existing conditions. Birkeland stated in his opinion the City needs to get some kind of balance between w hat currently exists and what the developer is attempting to do. The President of Brcnshell Homes stated they would be willing to table this application in PAGE 22 I r- MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 19,2000 (#2596 BRENSHELL HOMES, CONTINUED) order to address these concerns and arrive at a better medium ground. Hawn stated she appreciates the offer to table this application, noting that this is a difficult piece of property to develop with a number of complicated issues, which is not the fault of the developer. Hawn noted the developer has indicated he is willing to work with City Staff and the neighbors on these issues. Hawn encouraged the neighbors to work together with the developer on this proposal. Hawn indicated in her opinion she feels the number of lots being proposed for this area is ambitious and should be reduced by one or ^vo lots, with particular attention being given to the drainage issues in this area. Smith commented the number of variances being requested generally serves as a flag to the Planning Commission that perhaps what is being proposed for the area is a little too intense or not appropriate for the area. Smith commended the developer for suggesting that this item be tabled in order to allow these issues to be addressed. Lindquist stated he concurs with tabling this application, noting he would like to see the developer and the neighbors get together to discuss these issues. Nygard indicated he was in agreement. Hawn moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application ^2596, Brenshell Homes, 1181 VVildhurst Trail, to give the Applicant time to submit revised plans at their request. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. #2584 ANDREW AND TRACY RASCHER, 4705 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - CON®n*IONAL USE PERMIT, 10:03 p.m. - 10:18 p.m. Tracy Raschel>^plicant, along w ith Jeremy Bakkcn, Builder, was present. The Certificate of MaiHng and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Bottenberg stated this applicatlbn,w-as tabled at the May 15, 2000 Planning Commission meeting to allow the Applicant time to revisb<heir proposed plan regarding the construction of lakeside retaining walls. The Applicants are scckku a Conditional Use Permit to replace two existing retaining walls and construct two additional>9taining walls within the 0-75’ setback. A variance is needed in the 0-75’ setback since retaining wahSs^re considered as hardcover. Bottenberg stated the Applicants, the contractor. City En^«r, and City Staff met on May 19,2000, at the site to discuss how to stabilize the existing walls and swp<^' .th minimal impact to the property. The City Engineer at that time reiterated his initial obseNqrions regarding the proposed new- retaining walls as requiring substantial grading, w ith the recommendathsq^that no new retaining walls be constructed. Bottenberg stated another solution discussed was to replace the existing walls in tn^iis^rrent location and to their current dimensions. What, is being proposed by the Applicants is tb^ceolace the PAGE 23 D TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner June 15,2000 #2596 Brenshell Homes 1181 Wildhurst Trail Class III Preliminary Subdivision - 6 lots Public Hearing vV. r Zoning:LR-IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 Acre Minimum lot size Application: Proposed subdivision of one acre parcel of land into 6 one acre lots. List of Exhibits A B C D E F G H I Application Plat Map Preliminary Plat Layout Preliminary Grading, Drainage and Utility Plan Parkland and City Owned Property around Saga Hill Park Area Sewer Map Sewer Extension Map Property Owners Notification List Sketch Plan Staff Report (April 13,2000) Pertinent Ordinances Section iO.24, Subdivision 5(B) - Lot Standards for LR-IB zoning district Section 11.03, Subdivision 24. "Lot Area, Minimum" - Each lot shall contain the minimum area required for each proposed lot as prescribed in the Zoning Chapter of the City Code. In urban areas served by sanitary sewer, each lot must contain contiguous dry buildable land equal to the minimum areas as prescribed in the Zoning Chapter of the City Code or half-acre, whichever is less, (exclusive of public and private rights-of-way, vehicular or pedestrian easements, surface areas below the ordinary high water mark of any surface water wetlands or areas at or below the flood plain elevation for a specific property) and have legal access to the building site without encroachment of a wetland or flood plain area. •2596 Brenshell Homes 1181 Wildhurst Trail Class III Preliminary Subdivision JuM 19. 2000 pagt-i Application Review Brenshell Homes has submitted a preliminary plat application for a 6 lot subdivision of approximately 7 acres of land located at 1181 Wildhurst Trail. The lots would have access from Garden Lane, w’lich is a platted but undeveloped street. Garden Lane would connect Tonkaview Lane to Outlot A. The road is proposed as a public road to the cul-de-sac. All lots would be connected to sewer and be served with private wells. Sewer is available in Wildhurst Trail and would need to be extended between Lots 2 and 3 to the new road. The 6 proposed lots would average approximately one acre in size. Lots 2 and 3, located at the end of the cul-de-sac, do not have the required lot width for new lots in the zoning district. They would require variances for lot width. Lot 5 would only have 56' of frontage along the proposed road. Technically, this would require a variance as the width of the lot is narrower adjacent to Outlot A than Garden Lane. Garden Lane will only be developed to the intersection with Outlot A. The proposed access from Tonkaview eliminates a number of problems with the proposal with the sketch plan review. The Garden Lane access will eliminate driveways to Wildhurst, thus protecting the trees along Wildhurst Trail (Lots 2 and 3) and controlling stormwater runoff on site. This application has requires the following: ». r- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Approval of a six lot preliminary plat Construction of a road within the Garden Lane platted right of way Construction of a continued road into Outlot A Acceptance of the road as a public road Lot Width Variances for lots 2, 3 and 5 Sanitary Sewer extension to serve the six lots from Wildhurst Trail Construction of a stormwater management pond (NURP) Approval of a private dri . eway to serve Lot 6 thru Garden Lane Lot Standards Lot 1 is proposed at 1.03 acres, but does not account for land area dedicated for the NLFRP pond, llie City does not credit buildable area for land that will ased as a drainageway or for storage of stormwater. A variance would be required for lot area. Lots 2 and 3 require lot width variances because they are less than the 140' required width at the rear of the front yard setback. Lot 2 is slightly under the required setback. Lot 3 is approximately 100' in width at the setback. Both lots are through lots because they would have access to the new road and are adjacent to Wildhurst Trail. Mature stands of trees are located between the building sites on Lots 2 and 3 and Wildhurst. Soils types in the area make it difficult for vegetation to restore itself. The trees should be protected if the lots are developed. ^1^2596 Brenshell Homes 1181 Wildhurst Tnil Class III Preliminary Subdivision Junt 19. 200G pagt-2 \ h'r' IT Lot 4 would be a conforming lot and does have a buildable area that would be suitable for residential construction. Lot 5 would have would have approximately 90' of frontage along the front property line. Garden Lane is not proposed to be constructed north of the Outlot A connection. No direct access would be available from Garden Lane. Lot 6 contains a major ravine, shown on the preliminary drawings as a drainage easement. Section 10.55, Subdivision 15 (A) (2), "For properties served by municipal sanitary sewer, the minimum lot area may be divided by Flood Fringe lands provided at least one half acre of land not within the protected area is included in one contiguous parcel and both municipal sewer and legal access is available to that building site without encroachment on the protected area." According to the plan the driveway access would disturb the southern edge of the ravine. The City Engineer is reviewing the impacts of the driveway location on Lot 6. On-site grading and drainage plans must be submitted to the MCWD for review. MCWD permits will be required. Garden Lane adjacent to Lot 6 would not be developed. The land across Garden Lane is part of the Saga Hill Park. The ravine is a natural feature to the area and should be protected. Review Exhibit E half-section map indicating all land dedicated as part of the park and Garden Lane. Grading/Stormwater Management/Road Detaib (City Engineer Comments) Grading/Stormwater Management The road and most of the lots will drain towards the NURP pond shown on Lot I. The pond outlets to the drainage ravine along the south lot line of Lot 2. There is concern about the drainage being diverted into one location before it drains to the east side of Wildhurst Trail. It is recommended by the City Engineer that all drainage be diverted to the north from the pond and drain into the ravine located in proposed Lot 6 with some form of water retention downstream before it enters Lake Mirmetonka. The stormwater calculations indicate the runoff from the site would not increase, post development. However, the stormwater currently drains off the property in several locations. The grading plan indicates the drainage will now all be concentrated to the south ravine and out Lot 2. The subdivider should provide a map indicating the runoff pre and post development prior to Preliminary Plat approval. It does not appear access is possible to Lot 6 without impacting the ravine. The prelimLiary drawings show the drainage easement turning to the south to acconunodate a driveway. This would require land alteration and fi lling of a portion of the ravine to provide access. «2S96 Brenshell Homes 1181 Wildhurst Trail Class III Preliminary Subdivision June 19. 20C0 pagf-3 Road Alignment ... Although curve data has not been submitted to indicate the design speed of tlie intersection, it appears the road would not meet the standards for speed. It would be more appropriate to have a T intersection and cul-de-sac Garden Lane rather than have one continuous road ending in a cul-de-sac. Access to lots north of the Development The road is proposed to end at the intersection of Outlet A. There is one lot north of the development that is one acre in size that could be developed sometime in the future. The only access is via Garden Lane. A road ending at Outlet A will not allow ideal access for this property, but would be better than a private drive the entire length of Garden Lane to Tonkaview Lane. Easements/Covenants 1.Standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated 5' in width along interior lot lines. 10 ’ perimeter drainage and utility easements were dedicated for the entire property when the underlying Heathercroft Addition was recorded. 2.An easement and maintenance agreement shall be recorded for the NURP pond. 3. 4. 5. Drainage easements shall protect all drainageways, including the ravine areas. A preservation easement should be granted over the east portion of Lots 2 and 3 to protect the trees. The trees are located on the side and top of a hill. Saving the trees would protect the hillside from erosion and preserve the natural features as a buffer between the new lots and Wildhurst. If Outlot A should be a private road, an easement for egress should be granted in favor of the Citv of Orono. Park Dedication The Planning Commission should discuss th; issue of Park Dedication. Section 11.62 of the Subdivision Ordinance states “The form of contribution (cash or land, or any combination thereof) shall be decided by the City Council based upon the need and conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.” Dedication requirement of 8% of the land being platted or subdivided. The property is located across an unde''eloped road from the Saga Hill Park. This provides the City of Orono the opportunity to determine if a land dedication would be appropriate. Any land to be dedicated as a requirement of this subdivision could be reasonably adaptable for the public purpose of Saga Hill. The Code describes factors used in evaluating the adequacy of proposed dedicated areas shall include size, shape, topography, drainage, geology, tree cover, access and location. #2596 Brenshell Homes 1181 Wildhurst Trail Class III Preliminary Subdivision June 19. 2000 page~( The Council has the option of a cash contribution in lieu of land dedication. In those instances where a cash contribution is to be made by the subdivider, in lieu of a conveyance or dedication of land, the cash contribution to be contributed shall be equivalent to the fair market value of the equivalent undeveloped land that would otherwise have been conveyed or dedicated. The City shall account for such funds in a special fund named Park Dedication Funds. These funds are to be used only for the acquisition, development and improvement of public parks, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open spaces, and debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for such public purposes. The cash contribution is 8% of the fair market value of the properties. A minimum contribution of $2,900 per lot or a maximum $4,900 per lot would be required if the City requires a cash contribution rather than a land dedication. This item will be forwarded to the Park Commission for review at their next meeting. Given the location of the park area, it is possible the Park Commission will request a land dedication rather than collecting a park dedication fee. Land around the northerly ravine is most likely a candidate for dedication. Issues for Discussion 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Should lot width variances be approved for lots not meeting the minimum width requirement on the cul-de-sac? The pond on Lot 1 requires credit for the drainage area to be buildable. Should credit be granted for the lot. Typically, credit has only been given for stormwater ponding areas as part of a Planned P.esidential Development. Should the Outiot be a public road? The Comprehensive Plan suggests urban residential and urban service areas should be served with public roads. Is the proposed road layout acceptable? Should two roads be provided (Garden Lane/Outlot A)or would it be acceptable to combine into one road? Should Garden Lane be extended fiirtlier to the north to provide future access to other properties? Would a Park Dedication be appropriate for any portion of the development due to the proximity of the Saga Hill Park? If so what areas may be appropriate for dedication? The road and most of the lots will drain towards the NURP pond shown on Lot 1. Tne pond outlets to the drainage ravine along the south lot line of Lot 2 There is concern about the drainage being diverted into one location before it drains to the east side of Wildhurst Trail. #2596 Brenshetl Homes 1181 WildhuntTmil Class III Ptelimitiafy Subdivision Junt 19. 2000 patt-S -; ^ If i ir I , . PlaoDing Commission Options for Action: 1. 2. 3. 4. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat and forward to the Council, with conditions, Recommend denial, stating reasons Table, if road or any lots are to be redesigned or realigned. •Would require amending the grading and drainage plan. •Additional engineering information as may be requested by the City Engineer. •Direction given to the applicant listed under Issues for Discussion. Other Action. 12396 Bretuhell Hc-'nn 1181 Wildhum Trail Class 111 Preltmmary Subdivision Jum 19.2000 r 6 :-rv^ ^ - r % ' ^*^5\MINN" y *«3 Tl*'.f mL ’ -- /• ''• I-.. ^i •v„.v- O ‘ B preliminary plat PROPOSED SUBOtVISION FOR BRENSHELL HOMES OF LOT 2. BLOCK 1. HEATHERCROFT HENNEPIN COUNTY. MlWESOTA •••• c preliminary grading, drainage & utility plan PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR brenshell homes OF LOT 2. BLOCK 1. HEATHERCROFT HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA 200 scale in feet TOPOGRAPHY TAKEN TROM ORONO OTY UAPS possetc HOUSE snrc i"' \ r- --------% *a « .../J ■M'i V-. ’. . . •»..,*m «'» ".r. ....... • • O ... Kt-a /V/V / •• \ ■A. Wli/MJ^.rr.TtS..... ■■■•■•-::■•.•••••' I *• i j N------G /y’ R DEN s?~>vr' .......................................................................................................................................................... • - V .....•b-. W--L L. o m,L Ml 0>*^ •*A*‘l^’ • *<ii* -••«. . mmmMh « M*M AODSa 11« .• • I @ •W*T«*i»*| •: k,.»* n g .iw ^• • • V^*‘**v*t f Ir . C-A;-.: •. * A ' \*: \;f .-«-4 / /\ • ’’■ •■'-A 3-\ .•'A- * j >V •// yZ " \x *1 •/M,y\ y A r J —\ r f K \v^ X MN/>l-ii£ kI< <nB> . u5ft- •‘.^'^ <M tJLa>7E kr ^ •-••••••• 5Z •••••• :C-Z\^ *A1.C ICI.-||T iM\U , I M »?■ I ^.M I I .. I \ ' A .V '‘,■' '■ •«?\i. i 1 .1 I'IK I-/ •% • (ir :•*. I \ .-vv.\-^^\vi\y \ — -.--A. k :--.• ••- •*.*• • *:V •- — ••••• . . / 5i;,i„iS2A.,, 111 . ' I ••.! |i vr.^- / [••:'s“J:'-!. /• •0-7^/ \ )v_». rjiTE:/;4r--.:-"\.I- •• *m • «• ^ • i'\:: ■^'^ • i.>r .*?.“ ? •• vli ** , » • » I n t4ri Ujo) jb.. •T% %••- • “«•#nil' •fmk • *^ r. i f.* r^ - .,. ••»*.-. #. t. - .. '------1--------------l~tr !.•* 7(&^v.fXwv^ i \(?-i ?•*/•••; t ‘V* • ^•^•••» • • \ • •>• • / •••*••••«••••>•••/ •• I f*/••••• ••***•/ /• • »\ m J • • % m J •• •/ ; ••*• • i • • • • f • %•• ••••% • t m i \0 ;• • y • '1 ^• V •• nil -J V $t fm ■••lir ' ( 17) ti (e> ,. (l J t rz I ' (7) I . .. ........ · : . . . . . ---.. -... Ol) ,. ( )t) . . . . I I • - . . . � (l) :· • - - - - . � : · • • • • • ·: I • I t .. . - ' .. • I• I I I 0 .. . . I • . . . . . . •·. n• ii ()ll s .; \11) 1" St ( ) ( ... RUN DATE ES/lT/Oa lATCN Stl HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 30 •7-X17-25 2S 0017 OOOSO ADORPSS UNASSIGNED CITY OP ORONO CITY OP ORONO P 0 BOX A* CRYSTAL m S5.'2S SO 07-117-23 23 0020 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED CITY OP ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 04 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 PROPAOOR OWNER NANE taxpaVir NAHE/AOOR SB 07-117-23 23 0022 000S8 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED CITY OP ORONO CXTY OP ORONO P 0 BOX 40 CRYSTAL DAY MN 55323 38 07-117-23 23 0025 01181 WILDHURST TR ARNOLD H SPSKIN. ARNOLD H SOSKIN 802 ED6EM00R DR HOPKINS HN 55305 PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SB 07-117-23 23 0030 04720 TONKAVZEW LA STEVEN P I JOAN VALEK STEVEN F 8 JOAN VALEK 4720 TONKAVZEW lA HOUND m SS344 38 07-117-23 24 0007 01184 WILDHURST TR B D RASHUSSEN/S J RASMUSSEN BRZAN D I SANDPA J RASMUSSEN 1184 WILDHURST TR HOUND HN 55344 PROP AODR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR 38 07-117-23 24 0024 04475 FOREST LAKE LANDING RAY D HURLEY RAY D HURLEY <i475 FOREST LAKE LANDING HOUND HN B5344 30 07-117-23 24 0027 01144 WILDHURST TR LYLE E RAHN ETAL LYLE E RAHN 1144 WILDHURST TRAIL HOUND MN 55344 PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHi/AODR SB 07-117-23 24 0034 OOOSB ADDRESS UNASSICNED cm OP ORONO cm OP ORONO P 0 BOX 44 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 07-117-23 24 0035 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED cm OP ORONO cm OF ORONO P 0 BOX 44 crystal bay HN 55323 PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER HAHE/AOM SB 07-117-23 24 0037 044BS FOREST LAKE LANDING S W B N J ERXKSON SANFORD B MARGARET ERZKSON 4455 FOREST LAKE LANDZNO hound HN 55344 38 07-117-23 24 0038 04445 FOREST LAKE LANDING JON D BLACKSTONE ET AL JON D BLACKSTONE 4445 FOREST LAKE LANDING HOUND HN 55344 REPORT NO. PI435401 PACE 1 SB 07-117-23 23 0021 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 44 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 18 07-117-23 23 0029 00038 ADDRESS PENDING HliNNEPIN FORFEITED LAND C:TY of ORONO 2750 KELLEY PKWY P I BOX 44 CRYSTAL BAY HN 5SS2S 38-07-117-23’24 0023 0447i:FOREST LAKE LANDING R»tY D HURLEY RAY DONALD HURLEY 4476 FOREST LAKE LANDING HOUND HN 55344 38 07-117-23 24 0029 01085 WILDHURST TR H A SCHULTZ ETAL HARVEY A SCHULTZ 1005 WILDHURST TR HOUND MN 55344 38 07-117-23 24 0034 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED RIO HENNESSY RICHARD L HENNESSY 7520 BL00HIN6T0N AVE S RICHFIELD HN 55423 38 07-117-25 24 0043 01131 WILDHURST TR J I C CULLZTON JOHN H I CINDY L CULLITON 1131 WILDHURST TR MOUND HN 55344 'W RUN DATE 0S/I7/00 •ATCH SOI HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PX435A01 PACE 2 PROPAOOR ONNER NANI TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR Se i7*U7-2S 20 0004 OliSO -WXLOHURST TN HXCNAEL S WEAR t BRIT S HXCNAEL S WEAR 1134 WXLDHURST TR WOUND NN 55344 WEAR 36 07-117-23 31 0015 01270 WXLDHURST TR J I R STASIK JANES STASIK 1270 WXLDHURST TRAIL HOUND NN 55364 30 07-117-23 31 0026 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXCNED TODD C BXRKELAND SUBJ/LE ROBERT K HARIT BXRKELAND 1290 WXLDHURST TR HOUND NN 55364 PROP ADOR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER klAHE/AOOR SO 07-117-23 31 0036 01214 WXLDHURST TR GARY W WELSH ETAL GARY W WELSH laO WXLDHURST TRL HOUND HN 55364 30 07-117-2i 31 0037 01200 WXLDHURST TR SANDRA J HOLLENHQRST ET AL SANDRA J HOLLENHORST 0 HICHAEL J HOLLENHORST 1200 WXLDHURST TR HOUND HN. 55364 30 07-117-23 31 0030 01261 WXLDHURST TR SCOTT HXCHAEL HENNESSY SCOTT H HENNESSY 1261 WXLDHURST TR HOUND HN 55364 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR 30 07-117-23 31 0040 01297 WXLOHURST TR DEAN T LUNDBLAD ET AL DEAN T LUNDBUD B SNERRX J STELOW-LUNDBUD 1297 WXLDHURST TR HOUND HN 55364 30 07-117-23 32 0027 04635 TONKAVXEW LA H BOON 0 H H BOON HENK BOON t HARK H BOON 4635 TONKAVXEW LA HOUND HN 55364 30 07-117-23 32 0020 04655 TONKAVXEW LA DENNXS A HEYER DENNXS.A HEYER 4600 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND HN 55364 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 3B 07-117-23 32 0029 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXONED DENNXS A HEYER DENNXS A HEYER 4600 NORTH SNORE DR HOUND HN ' 55364 30 07-117-23 32 0043 04640 TONKAVXEW LA KENNETH J HXCKEY KENNETH J HXCKEY 4640 TONKAVXEW LA HOUND HN 65364 30 07-117-23 32 0045 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXONED J D DOLEZAL B J A ROSTAD J D DOLEZAL B J A ROSTAD 5046 BARTLETT BLVD HOUND NN .55364 PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR SO 07-117-23 32 0046 04650 ' TONKAVXEW LA JEFFREY S NOROSTROH' ET AL JEFFREY S B LXSA K NORDSTROH 4650 TONKAVXEW LA HOUND-HN 55364 SB 07-117-23 32 0047 04690 TONKAVXEW LA W B S BULL WXLLXAH A BULL 4690 TONKAVXEW LA HOUND HN 55364 ■ 30 07-117-23 32 0063 04620 •TONKAVXEW LA TODD R COURNEYA TODD R COURNEYA 4620 TONKAVXEW LA ORONO HN 55364 ■:!' PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR TOTAL BATCH 501 00033 ?^ r /V X TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner April 13,2000 #2576 Brenshell Homes 1181 Wildhurst Trail Sketch Plan Review of a 4 lot subdivision t-- ii' ■‘ K Zoning:LR-IB, One Family Residential (non-lakeshore), 1 Acre Minimum lot size List of Exhibits: A B C E F G Application Plat Map Zoning Map Topo Map Proposed Plat Previous Plan (Zoning Application #2239) Application Summary: Brenshell Homes has filed a sketch plan for a four lot subdivision of a 6.87 acre parcel located within the LR-IB zoning district. The purposed of the review is to consider the four lot plan that includes three lots requesting variances for lot width. The three lots also request direct access to Wildhurst Trail. A fourth lot with access to a driveway located in the platted, but undeveloped, Garden Lane is also proposed. ________________________ Pertinent Ordinances: 1.Section 11.10, Subdivisions 6,7 and 8 - Purpose of sketch plan review. 2.Section 10.24 - LR-IB zoning district standards. 3.Section 10.56 (Shoreland Regulations) Subdivision 16 Application Summary: The proposal incorporates the 6.86 acre Soskin property east of Garden Lane. Access to the subdivision is proposed via direct access for Lots 1,2 and 3 to Wildhurst Trail and an access to Lot 4 via a private driveway located within the Garden Lane right of way. Garden Lane was dedicated in 1921 at a 60' width. All lots meet the minimum 1 acre requirement as shown, although this does not account for any stormwater or other easements which might be needed. Variances would be W2S76 Brenshell Homes 1181 Wildhurst Trail Sketch Plan Review of a 4 lot subdivision April 17. 2000 pagf-l required for the three lots that front on Wildhurst as they do not meet the minimum 140' lot width all new lots in the LR-IB zoning district require. It would be contrary to the City of Orono s Comprehensive Plan and practice to grant variances to create lots that do not meet the minimum requirements in the Code. Review Comments 1. 2. Drainage/Grading Plan. There are two major drainagewaysv/ithin the property. There is a major ravine that intersects the north end of the property, in the proposed Natural Area and (Please refer to the Site Plan attached as Exhibit C). The City will require a drainage easement over this ravine. A major portion of this property drains to the south and east to a less dramatic ravine area that drains under Wildhurst Trail and eventually to the lake. There is concern about erosion on the east side of Wildhurst Trail due to stormwater flows, and the neighboring property owner west of Wildhurst has, constructed a minimal ponding area to reduce the flow rates which were threatening the driveway access. Stormwater calculations should be submitted for review to ensure additional hardcover in the development will not further increase flow rates. Additionally, private driveway accesses are proposed on Wildhurst Trail. There is no indication how the stormwater will be directed and treated prior to crossing Wildhurst. There is a high potential for erosion. City Staff is concerned about any new access to Wildhurst Trail. It is the recommendation of Staff all access for the development is via a new road constructed by the developer through Garden Lane with a cul-de-sac serving any lots within direct access. The topography favors access from Tonkaview. On-site grading and drainage plans must be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their review at the time the preliminary plan is submitted to the City. The MCWD will review the plans only after receiving preliminary approval from the City. Grading plans submitted with the formal application must include existing and proposed 2’ contours. The plans must also include erosion control, building pad locations and elevation and temporary erosion control during construction. Staff Recommendation Regarding Property Access. Earlier proposals on this site indicated access to the property via Garden Lane. Staff does not support direct access for the lots to Wildhurst. There are concerns with additional driveways being located on the road when alternative access is available through Garden Lane. Locating the driveways directly onto Wildhurst Trail would not allow stormwater to be treated. The City of Orono will require stormwater ponding that can be treated with aNURP pond being constructed to treat additional run off from the street and within the development. Attached to this report is a proposed lot layout from a preliminary plat application for this property in 1997. TTie lots were proposed to all have access from a road built in Garden Lane W2S76 Brenshetl Homes 1181 Wildhurst Trail Sketch Plan Review of a 4 tot subdivision April 17. 2000 page-2 to a second road ending in a cul-de-sac, Exhibit G. 3.Designated Wetlands. There are no designated City or NWI-mapped wetlands within the property. The major ravine and drainageway at the northern portion of the property is not designated on the City’s wetland inventory maps. All land not used for stormwater management and road purposes will count towards dry buildable for zoning purposes. 4.Utilities. This property is within the MUSA and sanitary sewer is available from either Tonkaview Lane or Wildhurst Trail. Water supply will be provided by individual private wells. Sanitary sewer will have to be extended approximately 300' north along Wildhurst if that route is used, which is probable since the sewer in Tonkaview would have to be lowered to serve the lots. The developer will bear the cost of sewer installation in addition to a per unit sewer connection charge. The property has not been assessed for sewer. 5.Easements. The City will ask for a dedication of drainage and utility easements at 5' width along all internal lot lines and 10' along the proposed road right-of-way. The City will ask for drainage easements over all retention areas, drainageways and storm sewers. 6.Park Impacts . This proposal may not be necessary to providing access to the Saga Hill park. Access and a parking area have been located off Tonkaview. This sketch plan application will be forwarded to the Park Commission for review at their next available meeting. Given the location of the park area, it is possible Park Commission will want land dedication rather than collecting a fee as part of this subdivision. The developer will need to know what land is to be dedicated. Land in the area of the northerly ravine is the most likely candidate for dedication. Summary of Issues for Discussion 1. Plaiming Commission should provide applicant with general direction regarding the following issues: Road system configuration, driveways vs. road access for the lots. Shall any access be permitted from Wildhurst. Public vs. private roads. Future access to adjacent lots. Whether lot width variances noted are acceptable. Address any other issues raised by staff or applicant. 2. 3. 4. 5. W2S76 Breiahell Homes U81 Wildhurst Trail Sketch Plan Review oft 4 lot subdivision Aprilil 2000 pagt-3 * % It k. CITY OF ORONO ^ 6122494616 03/20/00 17:46 tl* :11/18 NO:792 AppUeatioa# CTTV OF ORONO • SUBDmSION APPLICATION Date Received""^ Amount Paid ^ o SK^+cU Plc^v> p€v»eu/ PROPERTY LOCATION Slteaddrfcss //g /A/r ly^u i^s 'i‘ I ^ • J PropertyIdentiScationNumber(PID)a^ COZST Plea» check one - Property____abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to applicatioQ. ^ ___/.// iL^ ^APPLICANT hruxskL/l fioMCS Address p ‘0> Mok City AT oct Mif ^ >i///i neffT^ Phone (home)“XcT*^ ZipSif544^Phone (work) owner (if difimnt than applicant) Nanie n ry\ a l a S c Address Glty__ osk i K1 (attach list if more than one) Zip Phone (home) .Phone (work) e^sUng land use 'Number of Tax Parcels Development Size / Present use (check) Present Zoning District PROPOSAL J. Acres Dry Land ^les Wet Land Acres Total, all paitcls Residential; no, of^unlts /_ ler(specify) VACHKl\r Other (specify) Number of Building Sites Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Reairangemeiit Only (no new building sites) Subdivision forNewJBuilding Sites O ExictiiiflExisting Units New Units Total Units Proposed (jross Density Mi^um Lot Size Proposed Use (check) ^ Units per *7 Acres Sq. Ft, Dry Buildablc Land y Residenti^ ______Odicr (specify)________ i G *.•I %J S 1? ” s V’3 s 1 3 , ?9 - 3.»\ o U ‘ 3 • s s-1 3\-‘ ^ 5 V *** ’ S't3£•S .'* :• • o •1^ o'*.( 16)-ip^'«*V-—-3 •• 5 P o 9(13),: o kC ’S'S'. 4 »i 3^^ so ) 4 v.-u.C-!c.:r<3v • r***“»«f«o Irt.tu. «tl««. « •••#♦ ir? LR 1A R ·B s CRYSTA BAY R S G PAR. C LA .......... �--.....-... -------------------- I /tjJI) I f 1;1/ I II /2 1/I I / I//J / 1.i ll 1 ����s::� • • u, .• • . ........_ ___ _ • ,so .• •• . ,.. :;vV Wildhurst by Brenstiel Homes 3/22/00 M. !^-# O 5 '1 P weer � C/5 en nnc •·GA INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. GARDEN LANE SITE OAONO,MN CONCEPT SKETCH A L.O 1 2 J ' 5 6 7 AVERAGE ... LOT AREAS ft .. AREA· sf '"' 59 000 H.ooo 45.000 0,600 43,&00 53.000 45,000 I- Application Date: 8/23/00 Completion Date: 8/23/00 60 Day Deadline: 10/23/00 roMMoii meeting SEP 2 5 2000 3 Cl I Y KJt UHOf^Q REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Wendy Bonenberg Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner Item Description:#2613 James Renckens 3020 Watertown Road - Variance DATE: 9/25/00 Agenda Section: Zoning Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre) Lot Area: 11.825 acres List of Exhibits: A Resolution B Notice of Planning Commission Action C Staff Report and Exhibits of 9/18/2000 Application Summary: The applicant has requested a variance to permit the construction of a 24' x 36' accessory building between *iie principal structure and the street. The accessory building will be used for storage. The lot is approximately 460' wide and 1,170' deep. The residence sits approximately 678' from the street on the rear of the property. The accessory building will be approximately 40' from the side lot line. Note that the location of the building 40' from the side lot line precludes its future use as a horse bam. The applicant is planning to landscape the area by the accessory building and berm along the street. This will aid in screening the building from the street and adjacent properties. The adjacent properties on Crystal Creek are a very long distance from the proposed site. (See Exhibit E), The accessory building meets all setback requirements for the RR-IB zoning district, and the square footage of the building is within the 1000 s.f. maximum for standard accessory structures. 1.Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (D):Accessory Building Location: No detached garages or other accessory building shall be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal building on that lot. To permit a 24' x 36' (864 s.f.) accessory structure closer to the street lot line than the residence. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote to: Approve the application as presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24. SUBDIVISION 5(B), FILE NO. 2613 WHEREAS, James R. Renckens and Debra A. Renckens, (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 3020 Watertown Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: That part of the South 1170 feet, as measured along the west line thereof, of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 118, Range 23 West of the 5*** Principal Meridian, lying east of the West 869 feet, thereof, as measured along the south line thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to allow placement of an accessory structure between the principal building and the front lot line where no accessory structures are normally allowed. WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 18,2000, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Minnesota: 1. 2. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2613. This property is located in the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 18,2000 and recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0. Page 1 of5 4.The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A.The location of the residence is 678' from the street toward the rear of the 12- acre property, making it impossible to place an accessory structure within the front 7 acres without a variance. B.The proposed location requires significantly less additional driveway construction than conforming locations north of the residence. C.The height of the proposed building will be significantly lower than the height of the existing house and will be screened from the road by proposed vegetation, therefore the visual intrusion of accessory structure will be minimized. m: .if 5. 6. D.The proposed structure will be located more than 40' from the side lot line, and approximately 200' from the front lot line, reducing its potential impact on neighboring properties. Further the proposed location is more than 200’ from the nearest existing or potential neighboring residence, reducing its visual impact. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance will not adversely affect traific conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. I it:Page 2 of 5 Il CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to allow the proposed accessory structure to be located nearer the f^ont lot line than the principal building. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit wdthin one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 25,2001). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of September, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 3 of 5 r i: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of September, 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of,2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _________________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of Public within and for said County, personally appeared ., 2000, before me a Notary .known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 /I ^/ ' •' Ny/'‘ / / I ,J w «'I f —r.we ;R.-ff«. / .•«aanT.l/^u / '.•••F*rcs«''^ ,■-4 ^ *J «i ./ .•V '^•?oo-tl -t?:o •1-? f / I y •\jmi !/ suj:.w.ZxJ— 4 I -5''®2t>» M w VA» J W> .IX KH. -. It I cV -l^-U^XK. ••*^K •I % —■I ■t~~ >CCi --•• • * -• Wr-rf». h^j:>:i_J •(••'-f /... .:*• • • *.. 4 4 . ..(V^ vi -hCi ^ >‘'7' .-ZZS ••^' . - • — -V’s'o-V^iO / // '’**• ••.»—■■■»t •' >1 r •• •i>r •I i I CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 ZONING FILE #2613 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: September 19,2000 TO: James and Debra Renckens 4680 Forestview Lane Plymouth, MN 55442 COPIES: Steiner & Koppelman 18340 Minnetonka Blvd. Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: September 18,2000 VOTE: 7 FOR AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council on September 25,2000 at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. •r-• 1 TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Hawn and Orouo Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner September 18,2000 SUBJECT:#2613 JimRenckens 3020 Watertown Road Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acre) Lot Area: 11.825 acres List of Exhibits A Application Site Plan/ Survey Views Photo of Property L.ocation Map Plat Map Property Owner’s List Permit Record B C D E F G H Pertinent Code Sections 1.Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (D):Accessory Building Location: No detached garages or other accessory building shall be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal building on that lot. To permit a 24’ x 36' (864 s.f.) accessory structure closer to the street lot line than the residence. Application Summary: The applicant has requested a variance to permit the construction of a 24’ x 36’ accessory building between the principal structure and the street. The accessory building will be used for storage. The lot is approximately 460’ wide and 1,170' deep. The residence sits approximately 678 ’ from the street on the rear of the property. The accessory building will be approximately 40’ from the side lot line. Note that the location of the building 40' from the side lot line precludes its future use as a horse bam. The applicant is planning to landscape the area by the accessory building and berm along the street. This will aid in screening the building from the street and adjacent properties. The adjacent properties on Crystal Creek are a very long distance from the proposed site. (See Exhibit E). The accessory building meets all setback requirements for the RR-1B zoning district, and the square footage of the building is within the 1000 s.f. maximum for standard accessory structures. Statement of Hardship; The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. *2613 Jim Renckens 3020 Watertown Road Variances-p. I f ■t-l k iMueg for Consideration; 1.The applicants options for locating the accessory building are limited. The property on the east side of the lot is low and includes wetlands. 2.The accessory building will not impact adjacent properties, being 300' plus to the nearest adjacent residence. 3.Does the Planning Commission have additional issues or concerns with this proposal? Staff Recommendation! Recommend approval of the variance to allow construction of a 24’ x 36 ’ accessory structure between the principal structure and the street per the proposed plan. Jim Renckens 3020 Watertown Road Variances-p.2 /? . b Application ir^ Date Received ''‘^'^9 « Amount Paid l^A CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFOj^IATION . /^p j Site Address 30^0 f ___bA---------------;----- Property Identification Number fPJ.D.1 ~ 3^ ^ POOJ----- Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired------------------------------------------------------------------^(mouth/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property; A residentiad ___pother (specify)^---------------------------------- - ■ rict: feg-t “Zoning District; applicant / / Name ^ Address: Vo /v fc> v i<o OWNER (if different thM applicant) Name t /.Vi i ^ A Phone (home)_______^_______ Phonefworic^ City; iUxy t ii ________ Zip: Address;City;. Phone (horned ^5 ^ ~ Phone (work't ____________Zip:_____ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Constmetion Cost $ Describe request in detail:^------- yf V4 ‘^X ^•»i'_______________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width Setback:Front Other (specify) Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore k compliance with ZoniM Code h L\ri‘b>Ic (attach additional sheets if neceslary] REQUIRED SUBmiTALS • • All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Fonn Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8‘/2" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 854" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views provide one (1) copy 854" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWER’S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner’s Signature /- 7 / u «• Date X Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. I r'i-KWti ?Sa I ww ^*r^^?•I^ r>N^ . p*rce:--v **1,7 ,'-=^*' -■*‘‘* *‘-*‘ ^--js*««i^v» ' ^iciefry u's&v . . -■ - ■^•- -r-T-. • •/ • ^ V. t I » .-r^---------I r ___di* -O ? B L /- // »-_w___^ rj'tatA'.HWO^if6U4C* t»— — t'" . In.. ''iSSiiic •• ■\: Y_/^'' :>}L(! / .r*# iil •• •• • ••• •• aSTJ>ND^ I 10 V-'s'b-'5^ "h .«!-? F»- O^T.,V<uE^I 4—^* 4--=1- K •■■ntm imniiiiiiaiiiiiiiii .................. •r> •. . • . . .V ■^'py, ■.*■- ■>’•- 'll'*.’ *■- bth Rd. T.IG. BOARDS W U4 BATTENS S/4xlO FRIEZE BD. i ! <0'rV-':V'V l-S X 2-6 'AUBCO* n4COF RECTANGULAR REDUOOD LOUVER ;i/t|ii yr I i ifIiIiii•iiih11 i! i! t •'' i ^rViV:ViVMV;:W.V,V:V.W07^ FI9M SCALE CEDAR SMNCsLES ua FASCIA UV U3 RAKE I'ill ll : • I.!.If.I! i:u.: W ir:’ii-i .. |i 1 1 • V 7>^ 1 rv d5 • i db c 3 c •• S/4 jcS MEADTRfli lU/ 3 S/a* CROUN MLDG. CEDAR SI-HNGLE SIDING S/4 m6 TRIM BD. S/4 mIO TRIM BD. W/ DRIP CAP eo s/4»»a TRIM BD. ©, .GARAGE ELEVATION I 7 1/4* » l*-0* CD C<1 mum - ■ ■ ^’.Awi•4 ly IQ IQlU Q O §(Ko Ci1 I s 5 UA I 1 * m. Ik. ...1%': '•■■ii' fc •-'•■ i •r'k. bi* R6. T.«& BOARDS HV te4 BATTENS ^4» ■ III* I ‘ ' ' I 1 • I I : ! ! I !;i TF==^U•I I i 1,1 JI,I,I,I,I • p i;i'i;i'!!' ilili!^ Wiliii'II'i!ri:r!:! i:i>-7-r^.' ix\ Vi'i V'^iili!ili.!.: ..I,: .,i.i 1 ‘i'iiX’- 11*11='Vi IT'*: i:!!; i.i i; I'l'i'iyi' I !I* •; ‘1*1* ’*11.11 ill !Ol' Vi' 1 • i'ili! I!ii! iH'i! !|Iji Miii I--;' !'I lil lil !•' i I I.u .11 ••• • I !;i.i ,!'i i •*!*»*'••* ' i’l 1 : III I! rr*** . I,... . ij. I ' II:'I 'll I ’•i'Z '| '.!g :x:i'lVl‘.'- V'l'.ViV. CEDAR 5MNCLE SIDNa »/4mA TRn 60. »/4xl0 TRn 60. UVORIP CAP OK OR OvERLAYi •U6. 1x5 4 UI2 RS. TRn 605. -3/5* X 4- T.40, V-JOINT CEDAR 60ARDS 5/4x6 TRn 60. ©GARAGE ELEVATION 1/4* = r-0' '1 ^tr2 i*<V- I r* « b B’-e* CUDM 2024 "T31 : ir" si: — 'I3I.I 3li I 'f CUDM B*-B* II*-4* 3£^*-0* B*-B' CUDMI2024 —1 !f w ei sI,* fi.. ■ I ©GARAGE FLOOR PUN 1/4“ s f-0“ OPTIONS M SNEeTNTEMO « CEILNa tut IF 3; t4SULATeUAL! A5PMALT 6MINC^ES ROOF VENT6 Aft REQUIRED &• FELT PAPER I/2- PLTUOOD ROOF ftMEATMNQ -\_JS3 7k aUBFASCIA ue FASCIA lU/ Ik 3 rake 7x4 LOOKOUTS • 74" OjC. 3/8* PLTUOOD SOFFIT lU/VENTS AS REOJIRED S/4xD FRIE2E BOARD UV SCREEN MLDO. W PLTUD. SMEATWCi TTVEK* BUILDING PAPER CEDAR SMINGLE SIDNG S/4xlO TRT1 BOARD UI/DRIP CAP STU. K 3’-S*T. POURED CONC. FDH WALL 01/ 4-VU. K S*T. SLAB LEDGE 4 REITP. AS REO’D r"« ^ n $f*CT!0N liis K o fi S - 5 't 3,. l u ' X •>»i> •'■M »■■. ■ K J: I * -■' , ;,;^?«IT#!^^'^;,?:■’■■■. ■ ..;. *••,■-'••••'- ■’>*-■.•-.■.-,•■ ■•.■',■'■•;•!-■>*•-';■ *--’. V' ■• .,'; r.‘;--•• ■.••v;V-• '■ !' 'C.•^j'-j-y;- - wr v. •• -•.*»,V- •. ^ r- y- •k ^.• ■■.. ■.. .:•;•■■ - ^ ■ ..V.-;■■•~/;• -^ , ■ . -;.,■^“--^'r- — ' ■ '.•'..............’ •"ft • •!• •■ {»• -i* • .• . ' I ■ 4 DEER Hia RO CC V'CV •^orSi! •V T..Ro7 #*-■ ‘^-.*5 ’*V* S MEii .■ 6TH AYE N jLikek *> ■ 800 KEUET •' «. <: COURTR Y <^x “ijrx U.tt. DICXE7 :6 SUGM« at ^/ • nousr/iui lARIELS xooohIivenI -J2i — )RONO lAXXniCTQ .\l RCHARO^ —io " HIGH _________M COEMH- WEAR cm g VCW OR _________o oi5 IP ;___ WATERTOWN »»HD 0 THOROUGH IREO «« liA1-4 -o 1 6RAM0 ATE lOL^ 100 mJ K ■ ■ >■■■■m LONGVIEW rifl 1 BiVmg ^..••'* ............................................... ^•'•' ••""\ "^«l06t flo AamSOON WAT ORONO 1 VZj \ >^\f FRENCH LAXE\!! r"\ ST 1 ■ t n * W •t r f.. CLAIRE AODN 33-ng-Ai- 3/ C>4-yff 7- Ss‘<d 'K ■ />* ^\•%* ■•*>. .-rr> '-■^. i:V. /'.%k =«; MM MTC ■ATCM St2 Pirar AIRM OMNiR NAM TAXPAVER NAHE/ADDR PROP AMR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AMR SR A4-117-2S 21 0*01 §2MS WATERTOWN RD TOIL BAURLE THOMAS D R LOUANN BAURLE 2S85 WATERTOWN RD LONO LAKE MN 55354 SB M-117-25 21 8014 •88SB ADDRESS 'MASSIGNEO OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD ASSOC ROBERT HARE 1488 LONO LAKE BLVD ORONO NN 55354 HE»WEP1N COUNTY PROPERTY INPORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 OA-117-23 21 8808 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED EST OF RUTH F HEAR CITY OF ORONO PO BOK 44 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 38 04-117-23 22 0014 00040 CYCNET PL DIM CURRIER JR DONALD I MARGARET CURRIER JR 40 CYCNET PLACE LONG LAKE MN 55354 REPORT NO. PX435401 PACE 12 38 04-117-23 21 0018 820'>n WATERTOWN RD CEOKGAYN C KRAMER CEORGAYK C KRAMER 2940 SOMERSET LA LONG LAKE MN 55354 38 04-117-23 22 0024 80020 CYCNET PL H J I N N PANUSKA HAROLD J/MARGARET H PANUSKA 20 CYCNET PL LONG LAKE MN 55354 ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ABOR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SB 84-117-23 22 0028 83845 WATERTOWN RD BRUCE C I KATHRYN S NALL BRUCE C 8 KATHRYN S HALL S84S WATERTOWN RD ORONO HN 55354 38 84-117-23 22 0034 80838 ADDRESS UNASSICNED 8 J IN SETH ODD ULSETH STEVEN J ULSETH 3885 WATERTOWN RD LONG LAKE MN 55354 SB SS-118-2S 32 0003 80185 CRYSTAL CREEK RD KENDRICK D MELROSE KENDRICK B MELROSE C/0 TORO COMPANY 8111 LYNOALE AVE S BLOOMINGTON HN 55420 38 SS-118-23 33 0001 8S028 WATERTOWN RD J R RENCKENS IDA RENCKENS DEBRA 8 JANES RENCKENS 4488 rORESTVIEW LA N PLYHOUTM HN 55442 38 04-117-23 22 8038 03015 WATERTOWN RD GEORCAYN C KRAMER GEORGAYN C KRAMER 2990 SOMERSET LA LONG LAKE'MN 55354 38 33-118-23 31 0007 00225 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S K GOLDSMITH OLD SCHWIE S K GOLDSMITH 1 L D SCHWIE 245 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE HN 55354 38 33-118-23 32 0004 00195 CRYSTAL CREEK PILLAR HOMES INC PILLAR HOMES INC 428 UPLAND LA N PLYMOUTH MN 55447 38 33-118-23 33 0004 00175 CRYSTAL CREEK RD JYLAND DEVELOPMENT INC JYLANO DEVELOPMENT INC 150 BROADWAY AVE S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 22 8832 03085 WATERTOWN RD S J ULSF'X ADD ULSETH STEVEN J ULSETH SOBS WATERTOWN RD LONG LAKE MN 55354 38 33-118-23 31 0011 00245 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N S K GOLDSMITH OLD SCHWIE SCOTT K GOLDSHITH 245 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55354 38 33-118-23 32 0005 80038 ADDRESS PENDING KIN6SBRIDGE PROPERTIES INC KINCSBRIDGE PROPERTIES INC 3125 FOX ST LONG LAKE HN 55354 38 33-118-23 33 0007 08020 CRYSTAL CREEK RD CHARLES CUDD LLC CHARLES CUDD CO 275 MARKET ST 8445 MPLS MN 55405 IVr V- O \ MM DATE tA/aa/OA HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. Pl<i35‘«01 PACE 13 ■ATCH Its r-• » PROP AODR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR sa s3-iia-23 33 oaaa aataa crystal creek ro THOMAS H a LYNDA ISAACS THOMAS N a LYNDA ISAACS aa CRYSTAL CREEK RO L0N8 LAKE HN S53SA sa 33-lia*23 33 0009 00100 CRYSTAL CREEK RD HARR A a JULIE J MEN1N6ER HARK A a JULIE J MENINGER 100 CRYSTAL CREEK RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 33-118-2S 33 0010 OOIAO CRYSTAL CREEK RO D E BROOEN I L H BRODEN DAVID E a LAYLON M BROOEN 160 CRYSTAL CREEK RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AHM 38 S5*na-2S S3 0011 88178 CRYSTAL CREEK RO DANIEL a LAURA PRATE DANIEL a LAURA PRATE 178 CRYSTAL CREEK RD LONO LAKE HN 55356 38 SS>118-2S S3 0012 00038 ADDRESS PENDING CRYSTAL CREEK HOMEOWNERS CRYSTAL CREEK HOMEOWNERS 1802 WOOODALE OR- WOODBURY HN 55125 38 33-118-23 36 0001 00185 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RO N L S STUBBS ETAL LYOON SHERWOOD STUBBS 185 OLD CRYSTAL DAY RD N LONG LAKE HN 55356 PROP ADOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADOR 38 33-118-23 36 0005 00085 WEAR LA N N P a O N SIEVERT NtCNAEL P a GAYLE N SIEVERT 85 NEAR LA N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 33-118-23 36 0006 09055 WEAR LA N DIANA J GROSS DIANA J GROSS 55 NEAR LA N LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 33-118-23 36 0013 00155 NEAR LA N J B WINSTON BCR WERSAL J B WINSTON a C R WERSAL 155 NEAR LA N LONO LAKE HN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 502 00027 t '.'iL. I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OP THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OP PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE F. ^ D ft fW o I PERMIT RECORD (• Li-i-n. f+ k Permit Wo Date 3-! I - C,S' Cr'3’^~ 5r2r2J._ 67-7 / /Sofi //-&. 9; 'JLXJC./,:z,/y. V ^ J’o X3 ____ l^Ua^S-O. 3, ?-0° 3^10,00 3-/7— /-/2. Type of Permit /rUHrC .S^*=!Z_jeU28^ ^LA>'r-<- C 3-^?r,gg_ _ _ _ _ V"—“Xy^O^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Application Date: 8/23/00 Completion Date: 8/23/00 60 Day Deadline: 10/23/00 meeting SEP 2 5 2000 Cl I Y Ui- OHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: 9/25/00 ITEM NO.: Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2618 John Walker 1369 North Arm Drive Variance Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area: 31,305 s.f. (.72 acre) Lbt of Exhibits: A Resolution B Notice of Planning Commission Action C Staff Report and Exhibits of 9/18/2000 Application Summary:The applicant has applied for a variance to extend the front (street side) wall out 4' along a 20' section of the residence. The applicant is remodeling the existing residence and is requesting the extra 4' for garage space and a second floor bathroom. The existing residence was built in 1930 prior to current zoning standards. The residence is currently located 4.5' from the side lot line. The applicant tried very hard to remodel the existing residence and stay within zoning codes as much as possible. The 4' x 20' bump out will allow the applicant to work within the existing floor plan. The first floor is for additional garage space and the second floor is for a bathroom off the master bedroom. (Exhibit D). Each area will flow with the existing floor plan and aid in the functionality of their respective areas. The applicant is also constructing an addition to the northwest side of the residence and has been issued a permit for construction. The addition meets all the setback requirements for the LR-IB zoning district. 1.Section 10.24, Subd. 5 (B): Side Yard: The minimum requirement for side yard setback in the LR-IB zoning district is 10 feet. Variance Request: To permit a side yard setback of 4.5' where 10' is required. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote to: Approve the application as presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution. r V } *1r I I'i COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: r CUBF" T--------^— i: k*' 8L . •^tw&»,v CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 ZONING FILE #2618 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: September 19,2000 TO:John Walker 1310 Spruce Place Orono, MN 55364 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: September 18,2000 AGAINST VOTE: 7 FOR Planning Commbsion recommends the following: Approval as submitted. Applicant ’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council on September 25,2000 at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. > >• V4 t;: ;P t'Z> A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24. SUBDIVISION 5(B), FILE NO. 2618 WHEREAS, John W. Walker and Patricia A. Walker, (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1368 North Arm Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lots 21, 22, and 23, Block 8, “Saga Hill Revised”, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafler "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to allow a side yard setback of 4.5' where 10' is required to permit an addition to the existing residence. WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orcno Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 18,2000, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2618. This property is located in the LR-IB Zoning District, where 1 acre is the minimum lot area. The property consists of approximately .72 acres. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September i ?. 2000 and recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0. 4.The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: Page I of 5 rtiifcniiiiiti I •■.• 5. 6. A.The structural coverage on the lot is not a concern nor is hardcover. B.The existing residence is currently located 4.5' from the side yard setback where 10' is required. C.The residence was built prior to current zoning standards. D.Granting of the variance will have no impact on neighboring residences. E.Due to the location of the house and its interior layout, there is no practical way to locate the proposed garage space and master bathroom addition in a conforming location. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to allow a side yard setback of 4.5' where 10' is required to permit an addition to the existing residence. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Page 2 of 5 k [v .V- ^ A Planning Commission and City Council review. 2.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 25,2001). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and as'^igns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of September 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25 th day of September, 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of.,, 2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared_________ ______ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) )ss. ) On this day of Public within and for said County, personally appeared ., 2000, before me a Notary .known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 S 16 58*06* t 214.52* MEASURED 215* SAtSA HILL REVISED sy-5*! O OLD WCLL Ovn rO O cxisiiNa HOUSt I i -zK S 17 IJ’20* W 205.W ME.ASURE.0 205.75.' SAGA HILL RLVISE.D fitfiiipi iwi SITE COPY m O I” JOE. *00-007 JOHN t PAT WALKER 1366 NORTH ARM DR. ORONO. MN 352-471-7171 (HOME) 352-471-7303 IFAX) AU& 4. 2000 i TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner September 18,2000 #2618 John Walker 1368 North Arm Drive Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area: 31,305 s.f. ( .72 acre) List of Exhibits A Analysis Worksheet B Application C Site Plan/ Survey D Views/Floor Plans E Hardcover Calculations F Photo of Property G Location Map H Plat Map I Property Owner’s List J Permit Record Pertinc'jt Code Sections 1.Section 10.24, Subd. 5 (B): Side Yard: The minimum requirement for side yard setback in the LR-IB zoning district is 10 feet. Variance Request: To permit a side yard setback of 4.5' where 10' is required. Application Summary: The applicant has applied for a variance to extend the front (street side) wall out 4' along a 20’ section of the residence. The applicant is remodeling the existing residence and is requesting the exua 4' for garage space and a second floor bathroom. The existing residence was built in 1930 prior to current zoning standards. The residence is currently located 4.5' from the side lot line. The applicant tried very hard to remodel the existing residence and stay within zoning codes as much as possible. The 4' x 20' bump out will allow the applicant to work within the existing floor plan. The first floor is for additional garage space and the second floor is for a bathroom off the master bedroom. (Exhibit D). Each area will flow with the existing floor plan and aid in the ftmctionality of their respective areas. The applicant is also constructing an addition to the northwest side of the residence and has been issued a permit for construction. The addition meets all the setback requirements for the LR-IB zoning district. •The 4' X 20' bump out and addition will result in an increase of structural coverage on the lot to 2,244 s.f. (7.1%) where 1,312 s.f. (4.2%) exists and 4,695.75 s.f. (15%) is allowed. H2618 John Walker 1368 North Arm Drive Variances-p.l 2.The 4' x 20' bump out and addition w·n r sult in an increase of hardcover rage in the 500-000's tback area to 6 571s.f.(20.9%)wher 5,680 s.f.(18.l¾)existsan 10956.Ss.f. (35%) is . lowed. St tement of Hardship: The applican s have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The ryplicants should al o be asked for their t stimony regarding this issu . I sue.s for Con ideration: 1.Stru tural coverage · s increasing but still be,th allowed 15%. 2.Hardco r in the 500-1000' setb ck area is increasing but still belo the allo ed 35%. 3. The adjacent property to the east i set back further from th street and will real· ze no impact from the 4' x 20' bump out. 4.Th · lot is undersized for the LR 1B zonin �istrict. 5.Th res·dence w bui tin 930 we b fore current zoning standards w· r adopted. 6.Does th, Panning Commission hav additional issue or concerns with thi p oposal? t�ff Recomm ndatio : R comm nd approval of the side yard setback vanance. h f lk r JJ rt A m Dr· . anan . sp. ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area: R-1B Required . Actual S r ctural Coveraee: Total Lot Size 3 305 s.f. H rdcover Calculations: . Distance from Total area in horeline s tb k 500-1000 31 305 s.f. ot Area 43,560 s.f. (1 acre) 31,305 s.f. (.72 acre) Total Structural Coverage i Al owed: 4,695.75 s.f. (15%) Existing: 1,312 s.f. (4.2%) Proposed: 2,244 s.f. (7.1 %) Allowed Existing Proposed hard o r hardco r hardco er IO 956. 75 s.f. 5,680 s.f.. 6,571 sf. (35%) (18.1%) (20.9%) CIIT OF ORO O -VARIANCE APPLICATIO lniti� Application Fee $250.00 (S50.09 per each_ additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-cocforming structures $250.00 After-the-F ct Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INF0Ri"1ATION Site Address l 3 '71 N • 41.a:n DWtR Application # ¥J 8Date Received = 3--0 OAmount Paid :,f>;J:x># l2/ B Property Id ntification N1 ber (P.I.D.) Q 7-t, z -cQ3-4:.I --Qr'rtf -,::z. � ,• Att ch legal des cription to application if not included on required survey. C' '. .-:·.iDate Property Acquired __________________ (month/year)-· ·;, .. :'; . :.:� I ( o) (do not) also ovm. the adjacent parce s of land. Present use of property: .Lresidential __ other (specify) _________ c· 7-��\ .. , ·� Zoning District: L,2--f 6 � ,_. 1 �-, ..t i . APPLICANT ame ' � h lJ w. i,dA l l<e Q Add.re s · \ 3 I 9 � pv lit� PJ,,ce, ...... O\\l ;ER (if differ ent than applicant ) Name Phone (home)q S .:2-:I 7/.-11 ']��1 I Phone (work) _ _ _ , .. City: 0 r-o AJ O . Zip: SS � ,j/_ Phone (home) ______ _ ---------------Phone (work) ______ _ Address: ------------City: _______ Z ip: ___ _ D.ESCRIPTION OF REQlJEST Estimat d Construction Cost$ D scribe re uest in detail: ? � -ti. �� � ... 1 J;.d--,-wdlv,,. ___ .-_ -- (attach add.tion� she ts ·r necessary) VARIANCES REQlJIRED __ Lot Area __ L t Width etback: Front :L_side Hardcover Rear -r..1,1-<..,,,.,,.,......, Lot Coverage -- Average Lak shore __ Other (specify) ------------------------ H.-UUJSHIP/DESC'RIPTIO ' 0 UNU UAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describ und u hardship o r practical difficulty or unusua op rty co · · · r compliance \vith Zo · g Code r q · em nts: lJ e ..,__ .-,#,,--� s� .. �-����������������� 6 REQUIRE D SUBMITT ALS All of the following. information must be sub.mH1ed bv the application deadline d te in ord er for your application to .be considered �omptete: 1. 2. 3. 4. s. 6. 7. 8. - Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of 0\vners \vi thin 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Financ e, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910 ). Certificate of Survey (signed by a li censed surveyor) and include hardcover calc ulations as requir d. In ad dition, pro\ide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for repr duction. Topographic survey (exi�ting and proposed ele ations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. L1 addition, provide one (1) opy 8½" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or pla:1�� or floor & elevation vtews (pro 1ide one (1) copy 8½" x 11 °). List of the legai names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the prop�rty. This would include nam (s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any oth r persons you wish noti ed of this applicaf on. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this appli cation. Please remember that your variance application is n2t._com,plete if the abov formation has not been included. APPLIC T'S SIGNATURE ·The applicant hereby agrees to provide all informatio� required or reque ted by the Zoning Administrator, a ees to pay additional fe es (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or o ultant e penses incurred in revie\v of this ap9licatio , and certifi�s that the information suppli ed is true and correct to the best of his/her kno ledge. Applicant's Signatur '3.t-L. LD LuaCG:su Date /1.1.{:f 23 1 2000 0� 1 R'S SIG TURE To o �er her· by acknowledges and agre to this application and further authorizes reasonaol entry onto the pronerty by City staff, cons ltants, agents, Commissior. members, and Council memb rs for urpos es ot investigation and venfica ion of this request. Owner's Slgn atur ,t� lu • ldlif( Date Ql'u 2.3; 2000 Applicant must hav -a subm.ittals into th City o · ces 25 days before the Planning Com.miss· on Meeting. Planning Commissi _ n Meetings ar held on the third Monday of each mon · . Applicant. ust be present at all scheduled re i ,v meetings of the Planning Com • · sion a d Co. ncil. If an applicant is ble a end a scheduled eeting, please make a.rrangemen to ve an authonzed agent att d in your lace and to advise Bu;ldino & Zoning Offic of this change prior to the eetiJ.1°. 7 i ■ o -T *^ Qi Q O' < O' O Q oo Q • U3 |s ifi ^ > ISE ij I •/%\0 csi «j 2 X iiJ ^ •gs S 'S ,in I K \A I 1 I I ___ S 16 58'OQ’ E, 214.32' MEASURED 215' SAGA HILL REVISED (X) ■fH COca =«= smcoPY JOE) *»00-007 JOHN t PAT WALKER 1566 NORTH ARM DR. ORONO. MN 352-471-7171 IHOMEl 352-471-7305 (FAX) Aua 4. 2000 D LINE. Of EXIST. HOUSE -------^ r\BACK ELLELVATION FUTUQE DECK a«MapMp MM990 &'nr^rjir. pnr-nnn .TnaT: _______• II M M •• II I I « M •« M M I I H M H « «n •• M !• inrssi >1989] naw Mntsn vartTtr im99l| 19999994 >999999 ©scale.:!/fl=r-0" 6‘ Fia. 0 42* K.LOW C;^ADC ©I ^FC>0^'T E.LE.V ATIOM SCALE: i/e =' "0 D TftAftZOlO CLASS WINDOW TO MATCH THt raoNT cl ClDAa LANOtNC c.xis'^iva CHIM.SCT aLUSL STONI CK THL FaON r.MTPv sca:.£.; i/a-=! -o‘ V 'i- f': -7^ 4 -O’ -7^ 2X1 •»* OjC. Ttp. KC> pOST# f Tfi---- TO gjPPOQT 1HL 2-t^,L ftUMPOUy !-F-3^TI 0 I MLW 6^ BfftAiC OUT A 4r O0CfM M tXI&T. %LOCK HA1.L PCM COAT THC tXitT COMC. tLAft «/ COUOQ rtLLO flCfT Ht.lOHTfc C.XIST. OAAAOe. B4.0CK IN tXIST. HOLL -fCLO vta^T- V « lAtAll O0Ck A ACCCC^ Hoaroa itw ADonioN f roo ICCH tOUUHCNT rcLO «r# fiOlCTVt THt tXflT CONC. PLAHTtJll ON T^C sets or fp. r PossMct -rCLO vtprt OLPLACt ThL tX'ST. AAAAOt OOOO W/ A New ONt TO MATCH T>C OT^CBS QLMOVL T^C. tWST. COWC. OLANltaS tl- Trtt fWOWT I TTP ____J 4-0* 50 *2* 4-4 1/2*. P.ACFMF-WT PLAN &CAtt: I/O « I •» =A4 = ft f4 ». •■> 4o -« i/r i; -V ki ALPLACC LX1(T. UnNDOW »/ NtW vmrT dc ^ails se -i t/a* QLPUACC tXUT. WMOOW W/ MCW VtOif T OCTAtt L2-0- I-11^ fiOTt rCLO VtOTT &OMC VAU.S 00 ALL walls mat NLCO TO U SHLCTOOCKtO 00 JUST PATCHLO LXISTNO iCOQOOM *2 1 SS*X4S' 1 0 0- MWitta NCW 0000 VtOTT Size rA A= exist CLO. vLort eWSTMO SLDQOQM *1 QtrMSH MAflOWOOO rLOOQNO this QOOM MOTLi Ytort all DIM. MASTCR e>ATH 30* Mil. iULO MtW CLO HL9 DQi Hit PtSTALL NLW-^ CMMLT I TOP tXiST. eATH I • Q OCMOVt CMIST. OtLOf ATI THt WALL f BOTH OOOQS TO COtATL A HALL NSTALL NtW DOOO I OLVtOSl THt swmo 1 ( • k ___ u 0AUJN6S . -, . ^ 1. I - aaiBHiiljJa STCP —S TV5 5-1 fc*s -7:z -y exist Tw» w/ few fomjoc|*tfui MAY HAVt TO QCLOCATC 0000 rcLO ¥W«rT MOTt! reLO vtort soMC walls 00 all walls mat iclo TO le SHCCTOOCXLO 00 JUST PATCICO tXlSTtlO OLOQOOM *» iLMOVt TK tip^HAJOWAt f closct >«6lo TlOOO ovto •yn VtOif T S^MLO M THL 0(^Ni«6 ^0 MATC*- tXlST WALLS _/MASTCe BtOROOM ^.tV99K BEDROOM VVlt^OOVvCr FIRE n;'IV Pti-.3Ulr»H:' 20" MIN V-. 'lOl H 24" Ml.':. CLil'-r! i-IEtOl'ir 5.7 SQ. PT. MK4. 0'=EMI^..^ 44" MAX. SILL HGIC.HT SPECIAL NOTE attacked sheet .n T-h-f : 3DE requirements THRQ|Jd»- p OE PUMP AND/OR BG.ACCESS TILE UNACCEPTABLE GUARDRAILS 36-MIN. HEIGHT 4" MAX. OPEtJINGS rvjof APCOOX 2 1/Z' a if VtOTT lxact ; STAR LOCATlQiC. M TIC rcLO ;• 4-V: I 7-4* OtMOVL T>C LXlSt WOW 9 WAlC ift# a® « ^ cAtto ofr.mto CINTCXIP 0«fALaLACt ITS*: OCMOVt Tie tXtST - CLOSLTS f BIALO NtW WALXHN-CLOStT OtMOVC WOW set NLXT PLAN *MSULATC f rViSH WALL TO MATC» r •S vr-----MSULATC I rtiSH WA 50t>0M I wall SCONCt TTP CABiNtT w/r UGPCQS ^ -JL ___. * MASTCR &LDROOM SlTTiNO ASLA MtW ADDITION OtMOVC THt exist WOW'S I 0000 B4NL0 PLUMOMO WALL LXISTMO rot PL ACC OCKK OVtO THt oaoadl KLY exist WALL >TAT c,,.:__Z3 exist wall to OCMOVt nIIIIItuNCW walls to iueo few ADOTION OtMOVC exist. WMO LXIST. HOUSE. Ik '• SETBACK ZONE:iriEONE^0-75* A.House Chirr) n^'/ ^*tJ>SV£r^S B- -0«^ Length ^•2 X X X Width Z^ *2 3.3 jf’t 2 C.Driveway rPac^ C'trcJc^ D.SHcwaBt _ ‘J2aoir. *r^U^__ ^/CE.PaUo/l5cck _4~.<o X X X X X X /.<) ____ 2-^ \rJaoO f2S x -----F.Landscape -----------------x *2. »* 3 Undcflam5ra-<L^-^iiig±-----^^ ^ By Plastic _____-------------- Or Fabric 2>.? G.Other X total hardcover in zone total PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ^252^ ^ ^ PP9POSED HfXyPCQVTv^^ A, House —^— ------------- 3/2rp£i _ X100 Width •sloops. ---- B.Garage ----- C.Driveway ----- D.Sidewalk ----- -gCf^VVO ---- E.Patio/Deck ___ s tB X X X F.Landscape Underlaih^tf By Plasdc5HS'^2. Or Fabric i2^l£- ^_______ X 0-^ X ^ ^ I.S X 1.6 a H. G.Other total H^W)CO^^RW ZONE total FB^OP^RTY AREA IN ZONE ^xlOO ^-ZS-OO / ^ 1‘Q S.F. zn S.F. S.F. S.F. Z3 4^^/-S.F. s-F.-j..,:—4 ^t3 S.F. S.F. S S.F^S 3732. 3/30£. S.F. A S.F. B % I3t9. 00 S.F. S.F. t^~-5.F. ^041 S.F. S.F. ’si. (rfO- S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _____^S.F. la —!|.0|______S.F. S.F. S.F. A S.F. B /. 'r •.. .* r r I t II a \'A' j iy(^ r •a fii-' am^ Mi&>^ "'v'- ■'■•■■ ^-::i;ui : %r >. r I J'r i V c t.‘ ♦?', .-; •>~ j?;v • ■ »I '\t'\ .v:\ \ O 4 ' \ • \. V » .1 *”.,•■"• -®5~tt£3?3S^ ■■ -■. 1*^ r r •^* V -. -• ^. '• ■ ' iSi-Rvf f^.:;' . ,rkit.. 4C0 V_CHIPPEWA U BATSOE OFORICIR 0 TRAIS END cm EILEEN ST 2/^ CHBBTif S **^ ••• N RTM ‘ -•r-v* _ , !^kevicvir.' - ^ . * RED OAX T Red • Oak - .!?l V Golf-: . \ •nT, i^/-.Golf - ri*/" *■ .'•■ If;/.' ■ Ojursc *'; WEST BRANCH RD ’ • - ' ' ••f*? •• • . ••• ^ r V* * V • ..«!••.•’■ ••1--»EASTUtt •■ •* «•^ i_ f •V . •. •• •;.I* • V ^ • mm W A ■ **7 f ^•;. Stubbs • *• *.** V-: •• 8C0 Sire <v. ^0 - /•' ' - ' Nor11 *^ourse / I Jennings] Bay i|p AVE AVE ( ^oodUi%4i BoiMi : ^_______________.,mA oahl ro 3AV V &(]> tarn son SkogsbergPc nt g X 2 . \»Klt West o V ORONO^ li •• •• •• •*•• ••• I • Arm *' • Arm Shad loaf Point DEERJNO •» ISLAND BUOO '/jS Fagerness Point ^ Cryst (81) / / \ ^ >■^» c5^ 0 / \ PARK \ f'^A '2/,s . (90) 19 'X ^ / 13 /RR^ ^^ ^ (66) ^ \y*92 \S. ■^2). (g,? 10 B 9 (18) 88.' ®^ 8 . (65) \ 6 -8 % 3 (25)4 232 s.(63)2 in 'W’ ff <P T-1 Y »5.8 135.85 RLS \90 90 (4)? 4 ____________/._______ ................ \ H RUN MTE M/24/«f HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PACE 32 BATCH SSI PROP AOfW OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ABOR PROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR ONMn NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR \ 30 17-117-25 41 0151 •1371 NORTH ARM OR C N BANICK I R L K BANICK KARX I CHRISTOPHER BANICK 1371 NORTH ARM OR nOUtO MN 55304 30 07-117-23 41 0051 01305 SPRUCE PL CLAYTON R FUCHS CLAYTON R FUCHS 1305 SPRUCE PL HOUND HN 55304 30 07-117-23 41 0052 01370 NORTH ARM DR WILLIAM E BOWEN WILLIAM E BOWEN 40 PARK LANE MPLS MN 55416 30 07-117-23 41 0053 01374 NORTH ARM DR W E SUTHERLAND ETAL WILLIAM E SUTHERLAND 1374 NORTH ARM DR HOUND MN 55304 SO 07-117-23 41 0054 01300 NORTH ARM DR J W WALKER A P A WALKER JOHN W t PATRICIA A WALKER 1310 SPRUCE PL HOUND HN 55364 30 07-117-23 41 0055 01360 NORTH ARH DR J W WALKER 0 P A WALKER JOHN W t PATRICIA A WALKER 1310 SPRUCE PL MOUND MN 55364 03.30 07-117-23 41 0050 •0030 ADDRESS UNASSICNED J W HAUER I P A WALKER JOHN W I PATRICIA A WALKER 1311 SPRUCE PL HOUND HN 55304 30 07-117-23 41 0003 01377 NORTH ARH DR J E HOROSHAK EAR HOROSHAK A R HOROSHAK I J E HOROSHAK 1377 NORTH ARH DR HOUND HN 55304 50 07-117-23 41 0064 •1304 IWRTH ARM DR D J HHARRAH ELK HHARRAM DOMINIC E LINDA HHARRAH 1304 NORTH ARH DR HOUND HN 55304 i so 17-117-23 41 1005 •1307 NORTH ARM DR N D SCHLENER S C H BOYD N 0 SCHLENER E C H BOYD 1307 NORTH ARM DR MOUND HN 55304 30 17-117-23 41 0066 01301 NORTH ARH OR S H HALCHOH E N HALCHOH SCOTT H E NANCY HALCHOH 1361 NORTH ARM OR HOUND MN 55304 SO 07-117-23 41 0003 01300 LOHA LINDA AVE HEN KULENKAMP HARK A E NANCY L KULENKAMP 1300 LOMA LINDA AVE HOUND HN 55304 .'‘l SO 07-117-23 41 0004 USSR NORTH ARM DR R 0 TODD E C TODD RICHARD D E CAROL A TODD 1351 NORTH ARM DR HOUND MN 55364 30 07-117-23 41 0005 01300 NORTH. ARH OR J V CAMBONE E H J JOHNSON J V CAMBONE E W JOHNSON 1360 N ARM DR ORONO MN 55304 50 07-117-23 41 0004 01240 LOHA LINDA AVE J N CARY E 0 L CABLE JOEL N CARY E DIXIE L CABLE 1240 LOMA LINDA AVE HOUND MN 55364 50 17-117-23 41 IIOO USES NORTH AIM DR C TULLY E E CHALCREN C TULLY E E CHALCREN 13SS NORTH ARH DR HOUND NM 55304 TOTAL batch 550 00016 /3(o^O^Lryi i)V.a ■ k i 9 v>>» s PERMIT RECORD Permit No.Date Type of Permit c^/.-T4/7y It )yis9ie^• /ZtWJt.A U /d-y-^A /aMJJ fox^SH n-'ll'OO J / k'l K i/d 'Men. MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ 5 2000 CITY OF ORo/vo DATE: September 21,2000 ITEM NO.: y Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Senior Planning Coordi 3!^ Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: 2000 Marina Licenses: 1) Windward Marina 2) Genmar/Kiiigs Cove 3)Sailor ’s World 4)North Shore Marina List of Exhibits (For each Application) A - Application B - Site Plan Summary ’ License year 2000 license applications were received earlier this year from each of the five Orono marinas. Wayzata Marine was issued its 2000 license in February as it was a site under new ownership. Staff normally inspects each marina in mid-season and the City has typically issued annual licenses shortly after the inspections. We have now completed inspections on each of the other 4 marinas and are recommending approval of their annual licenses for 2000. Fire Safety Inspections In 1999 the City began contracting for the services of a Fire Marshal who has inspected all the marinas for compliance with State Fire Code regulations, and at this time I am informed that all are in compliance. Conditions of License Approval Section 5.43, Subd. 5(C), requires that each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. On-land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. pit fv 2000 Marina Licenses September 21,2000 Page 2 6. 7. Parking and on-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Individual Marina Reviews A.Windward Marina Windward Marina has 40 rental slips on Tanager Lake and 78 on Browns Bay for a total of 118. The marina sells and services boats and equipment in the facility on the Tanager Lake side of Shoreline Drive. A gazebo/toilet building is provided on the Browns Bay side. The site includes 26 parking stalls on the Browns Bay side, and 47 stalls on the Tanager Lake side, a portion of which are located on the adjacent residential property in which the owners, Mr. and Mrs. Rivers, reside. The attached site plan was approved by the City via Resolution #2674 on August 14, 1989. The applicant has generally adhered to the seven minimum operation standards. Aspects of the operation which require ongoir g attention in order to remain in compliance with the operation standards, include eliminating storage of marina equipment on the residential overflow parking area, maintaining parking spaces within the paved lot next to the building as opposed to filling it with boats for sale, and managing parking to minimize customer necessity of crossing County Road 15. Staff recommends approval of a 2000 license for Windward Marina. B.Genmar Industries/King's Cove - Orono Site Genmar/King's Cove provides 66 rental slips on Tanager Lake and 48 slips on Browns Bay of which 36 are rental and 12 are used for boats for sale. Facilities include 71 parking stalls on the Browns Bay side of County Road 15. This site underwent major renovation in 1997, including replacement of the old storage building with a smaller office and restroom facility, upgrade of landscaping, a slight increase in parking and a major expansion of the stormwater pond. No activities occurring at the site require a conditional use permit. Applicants are currently in compliance with the seven operational standards and the conditions of approval of the recent renovation approval resolution #3835. Staff recommends approval of a 2000 marina license for Genmar/King's Cove. m '4 2000 Marina Licenses September 21,2000 Page 3 C.Sailor's World Sailor's World operates a ship's store, boat club (CUP issued 1995), and rents slips, with a current dock capacity of 79 boats. This marina was reconstructed in the early 1990's. Landscaping work has finally been completed, and the sign has been updated. Activities occurring on this site which require ongoing attention by the property' owner in order to remain in compliance with the seven operation standards include: managing parking facilities, including the use of the Minnetonka Art Center for overflow parking to avoid parking and traffic problems, keeping the storage of boats and other items out of the designated landscape areas, and ongoing maintenance of the parking lot p>erimeter stormwater filtration system. Staff recommends approval of a 2000 marina license for Sailor's World. D.North Shore Marina if ■ !?-i' The North Shore Marina operation includes 93 slips in the water (historically the City only allowed 86 slips, but LMCD allows 93) plus a dry stack storage unit with 72 slots (all of which LMCD licenses but only 20 of which Orono has historically approved for lake use). The property also contains a service building, an office, a "club house" for slip users, and two dwellings, one of which is vacant and the other which has been used as a caretaker unit. The site provides ample parking for customers in the summer and a large capacity for storage in the winter. The last three winters this site has been fully utilized for boat storage. Two activities on the site require a conditional use permit. These include the caretaker dwelling unit and on* demand public boat launching (dry stack operation). Mr. Anderson has acknowledged that these activities are ongoing absent the required conditional use permit, and in the past has indicated his attorney has advised him to not apply. Both activities requiring a CUP have been ongoing for many years prior to the CUP requirement which came into effect in 1995. The use of the dry stack system at North Shore has not posed any problems for the C ity. The primary concern would be parking, which is ample on this, the largest of Orono’s marina sites. The secondary concern is boat density on the lake; however, since the LMCD has long maintained the position that all 72 dry stack slots can be used for boats that are for lake use (as opposed to for sale or waiting for service, etc.) it would be consistent as a housekeeping matter for the City to acknowledge all 72 for lake use subject to the applicant completing the CUP process. Activities occurring on the site which require the property owner's ongoing attention in order to remain in compliance with the seven operation standards include limiting storage of boat trailers and other equipment to those areas noted on the approved site plan. The applicant has recently completed a substantial amount of landscaping work in this area to make the dry stack units less visible from the road, and is planning to add more trees west of the service building to screen it from the adjacent residential properties. Staff recommends approval of a 2000 license for North Shore Marina, acknowledging all 72 dry stack slots for lake use subject to CUP approval. r* 2000 Marina Licenses September 21,2000 Page 4 General Marina Issues The marinas provide necessary services to the Lake Minnetonka community, by providing a wide range of lake access opportunities, boat maintenance and repair services, and winter storage. While it can be argued that boat sales (and perhaps even boat storage and many maintenance/repair activities) are functions that don’t strictly require a location on the water, one or more of these activities continue to be a significant part of tlic business at each of our marinas. Each Orono marina has site constraints that limit the level of reasonable site activity. A primary concern is adequate parking. Three of the five marinas have significantly redeveloped in the last decade, resulting in the City’s acceptance of a certain level of improvements which support varying levels of commercial activity for each site. None of the marinas have ever met the hardcover standards of the zoning code, but when redevelopment has been approved by the City, the amount of hardcover tolerated at the marinas has always far surpassed the hardcover limits imposed on residential development. The marinas generate only very few complaints from the public or nearby landowners. Parking management on a day-to-day basis has been one of the City’s primary concerns with marinas through the years, with the dual intent of keeping the level of site use commensurate with the site capacity so there is no burden on adjoining landowners nor on the public roadways; while maintaining site accessibility for general use and emergency purposes. Ancillary activities that have occurred occasionally in the past at some marinas such as fishing contests, charter boat activit>’ and various ‘special events ’ can create periods where the marinas might outstrip their capacity and negatively impact the neighborhood. In general, the marinas tend to be busiest during either end of the season when boats are either being dropped in or hauled out, and on fair- weather weekends throughout the summer. A perhaps secondary issue for the City has been the burden on the lake itself as boats have become larger and faster, and the methods for providing lake access have become more innovative (dry-stacking, boat clubs, etc.). However, in recent years the City has primarily focused on land-use issues and left the larger issue of lake use to the LMCD. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of 2000 commercial marina licenses for Windward Marina, Genmar/King ’s Cove, Sailor's World, and North Shore Marina. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Proposed Motion: Moved by_______, seconded by , to direct staff to issue 2000 commercial marina licenses to Windw'ard Marina, Genmar/King ’s Cove, Sailor's World, and North Shore Marina. Vote: ________ayes,_____nays. License Year 2000 REC cVJSD £B 2 8 2000 oaoNo rc CITY OF ORONO P.O, Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 612-249-4600 Bate^ppl?cation sent to Marina 1/27/00 Date application returned to City ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 29 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1.BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME Street Address \4"4'4^a | / M g, Mailing Address Marina Phone 4^7^ ^^Office Phone 4^7 g ^7 2.OWNERSHIP/OPERATION Fee Owner (if different than above) Address ________________ Phone 3.BUSINESS ORGANIZATION; (Check applicable item) ____ individual ownership ____ partnership ^ corporation List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title: A 1/V\____________________ Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: Page 1 of 6 ( > S'*' t f ^ W' List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: (dock attendants repair or service personnel others available for sales/public information, etc. List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above: 4.PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): 6. Principal Uses K in-water slip rental v' sales of boats/motors/trailers/ / manne accessories boat repair and servicing on-land boat storage __ winter __summer marine fuel sales sale of bait and fishing tackle Conditional Uses (Conditional Use Permit is Required) ____boat club ____public boat launching, on-demand ____public boat launching, transient ____charter boat port-of-call X caretaker dwelling unit 5,BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): Accessory Uses c,<-head pumpout X fishing tournament site ____sale of pre-packaged food ____dive shop ____ clubhouse (for slip or boat club customers) /lessons/teaching ^boat rental ____sailboard sales/rental ____iceboat sales/rental ____ice fishing tackle sales ____cross-country ski sale/rental open all year List proposed hours of operation: dock access retail sales & service MARINA SECURITY is pro\nded by: CARETAKER living on site? ___ open during boating season only to AM to O PM PM U Page 2 of 6 \ * fc'Tk' SMPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Company Owned Rental Rental Slips/ Other Boats Spaces BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) At dock slips Total Boats in Water a. BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE Inside Buildings ____ Outside on Racks ____ Outside - other means ____ Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use ____ a. b. c. TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a.Transient boats (repair/service) b.New boats for sale (inventory) c.Used boats for sale (inventory) d.Other (list:______^______) Total OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) a.Transient boats (repair/ser\ ice) b.Contract storage (customer's boats) c.Inventory (new & used boats) d.Other (list;_____________ ) Total Page 3 of 6 Inside Building JSSl Inside Building Total Boats \\l tl^. Outside Building ifk ____ 6'^'^ Total Outside Building 4 1/5 Total 1 A [:■ OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 12.SUMMER PARKING a.Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x__(line 9)] = Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp = Charter boat port-of-call b. c. spaces spaces spaces d. e. 1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] = Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d) Total spaces available per attached parking pla spaces spaces “7^ spaces 13.WINTER PARKING REQUIRED a.0.20 X (line 12e)spaces DOCK CONSTRUCTION 14.CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: X Permanent ____ Seasonal Wood ____ Concrete Metal Pilings: DeckingJ Wood Flotation Method (if used): X Foam ___ De-icing normally used Metal ____ Other____ Other__________________ Barrels Other Page 4 of 6 m K h ■ r ■'!■ attachments The following must accompany this application: 1.CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. 2.CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. 4.COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 ______ Renewal Application @ $200.00 $ ^ Ot> Late Fee (if not postmarked by February 29) $100.00 $_________ TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application and will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any Page 6 of 6 \ iries of storage access ) show >ed for ons of license nt City and lENSE Orono 'it>- of at any ' ' ' • '.'1 'Vn;' jttssssi i" 'S'- ., I ’.rvr •'.*• ..v: ’» / ,\r .•-I ............................‘,1 • . 'i-**'':-: :n •\ •.T-'Tr?;-"] ’»----------- V ‘ ^ T «sar 5 f • •4^ fil £ui-P --------------------- —V'' •' irrf‘- •-• •^ i-' License Year 2000 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 612-249-4600 Date application sent to Marina 1/27/00 Date application returned to City f! -OO ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City, PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 29 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1.BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME Oenmar Tndugt-r-i , Tnr Street Address inn ■c;nn^v.9/,nn, Minneapolis—MU—5 5402 Mailing Address ^3^9____________________________________________-— Marina Phone _____________Office Phone 2.OWNERSHIP/OPERATION Fee Owner (if different than above) Genmar Industries. Inc. Address _______________________________________ Phone ’I A i J.BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) ___ individual ownership ____ partnership _X corporation List the name of each partner or corporate officer and their title: Cranf F.___Oppp^flarrl^ Proc i rlatiii. Mary P. McConnell. Vice Pr^sldenr and—Serretrafy Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: Vir>£*g r.nvp_Rna^ ^al-a^ Page 1 of 6 W: . A 6. List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: 1 dock attendants ____ repair or service personnel others available for sales/public information, etc. (including above) List every short or long term business occupant of the propert>' other than the Business noted above: 4.PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): Principal Uses X in-water slip rental X sales of boats/motors/trailers/ marine accessories ____boat repair and servicing X on-land boat storage winter summer Accessory Uses head pumpout fishing tournament site sale of pre-packaged food dive shop ____ clubhouse (for slip or marine fuel sales sale of bait and fishing tackle Conditional Uses fConditional Use Permit is Required) ____boat club ____public boat launching, on-demand ____public boat launching, transient ____charter boat port-of-call _____caretaker dwelling unit boat club customers) lessons/teaching boat rental sailboard sales/rental iceboat sales/rental ice fishing tackle sales cross-country ski sale/rental 5.BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): open all year open during boating season only List proposed hours of operation: dock access 24_hrs to retail sales & service ____ AM to PM PM MARINA SECURITY is provided by: King's Cove CARETAKER living on site?_______Hn.__________ Page 2 of 6 it <Sf.lPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Company Owned Rental Boats Rental Slips/ Other Spaces Total Boats BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) At dock slips Total Boats in Water a.Ill m 111 111 BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE a. Inside Buildings ____ Outside on Racks ____ Outside - other means ____ Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use ____ b. c. TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKJE USE (Add 7 and 8)111 OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a.Transient boats (repair/service) b.New boats for sale (inventory) c.Used boats for sale (inventory) d.Other (list:) Total Inside Building Outside Building OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) a.Transient boats (repair/service) Contract storage (customer’s boats) Inventory (new & used boats) Other (list:_________________) Total Inside Building Total Outside Building b. c. d. 6-12 50---57 Total Page 3 of 6 t i:'-{ '-N OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 12.SUMMER PARKING a.Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x __(line 9)] = Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp = Charter boat port-of-call b. c. d. e. 1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] = Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d) Total spaces available per attached parking plan 8 spaces A7 spaces __ _ spaces ~ spaces 75 spaces 71 spaces fiV 13.WINTER PARKING REQUIRED a.0.20 X (line 12e)spaces tv-DOCK CONSTRUCTION 14.CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: y_ Permanent ____ Seasonal _ Concrete ___ Metal Foam Pilings: Decking: _ Wood X Wood Flotation Method (if used): _X_ De-icing normally used Metal ____ Other____ Other Barrels X Other .eIasxJLc Encased Fioam Page 4 of 6 i attachments The following must accompany this application: 1. 2. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. The drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. 3. 4. Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 ----------- Renewal Application @ $200.00 $ 200.QQ— Late Fee (if not postmarked by February 29) $100.00 ^_________ TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ 200.00 „ RFVIEW PROCEDURE . ^ WTien a complete applicaUon is received, the City Council will review the license application and. will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PURT.ir USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICEN^ BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City’s designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliance inspections. Relationship to Owner Same Page 6 of 6 daries of , storage s, access to sho\v ,osed for ations of 1e license rrent City :ation and. LICEl ·sE the Orono le City of rty at any • ..... j.fil l I I 11 r oon,,n� � �Alt rstAM!(l �ll l r ... 1 ··- :J> g� (" ..S) ..J .... l (I I I I° ·1 · 1 I J ·1� 1 • . ,, �' w·-,- � � . .. ·-1 j .. Cl ..............- \ CITY OF ORONO .. - cj oa O P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 612-249-4600 Date application sent to Marina 1/27/00 Date application returned to City License Year 2000 ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUB^^T SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 29 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1.BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME ‘ Street Address <.Vf ^V2 / Marina Phone ^3 Office Phone -C 2. 3. OWNERSHIP/OPERATION ^\n Fee Owner (if different than above)^ 3________ Address Lj 4 v\<. 0 2.0Po (o Phone /pi L ^ (n ^_____________________________ BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) ____ individual ownership ____ partnership 3^ corporation List the name of each partner or corporate office and their title: 6 /V-Y De i7iA/TT3 - ^r(-s .____________ Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: Q 4/L./h Page 1 of 6 List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: 1 "Zt It^'oock attendants I repair or service personnel others available for sales/public information, etc. List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above^^^^____________________________________________________ 4. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): PrincipaTtJses iiK^ater slip rental Z/.salessales of boats/motors/trailers/ marine accessories boat repair and servicing I ^x*^n-land boat storage winter summer marine fuel sales sale of bait and fishing tackle Conditional Uses (Conditional Use Permit is Rgduired ’l ^^oat club ____public boat launching, on-demand ____public boat launching, transient ____charter boat port-of-call ____ caretaker dwelling unit Accessorv^ses ^>*^ead pumpout ____ fishing tournament site i.-^sS[[e of pre-packaged food ____ dive shoji.^ 4^‘^'^^bhouse (for slip Ijoat club customers) ^/boat rental ms/teaching sailboard sales/rental ____iceboat sales/rental ice fishing tackle sales cross-country ski sale/rrntal 5.BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items): 6. open all year List proposed hours of operation: dock access retail sales & service open during boating season only r f AM to AM to PM ^ PM MARINA SECURITY is provided by: CARETAKER living on site? /^/A__________________^-------------------1—/^/A Page 2 of 6 SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS iA hi List the maximum number of boats in each category.Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. 7. 8. Company Rental Rental Slips/ Other Owned Boats Spaces BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) a.At dock slips Total Boats in Water //o BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE a. Inside Buildings ____ b. Outside on Racks ____ c. Outside - other means ____ Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use /- ^ ^6 lo(j> 2- Total Boats 13^ 9. 10. 11. TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a.Transient boats (repair/service) b.New boats for sale (inventory) c.Used boats for sale (inventory) d.Other (list:______) Total OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) a.Transient boats (repair/service) b.Contract storage (customer's boats) c.Inventory (new & used boats) d.Other (list:_____________ ) Total 77 Inside Buildine Outside Building Inside Building 5 Total Outside Building 3 Hf Total Page 3 of 6 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 12.SUMMER PARKING a.Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x __(line 9)] = Launching ramp customers (day use) 10 spaces minimum per ramp = Charter boat port-of-call b. c. d. e. 1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] = Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d) Total spaces available per attached parking plan 13.WINTER PARKING REQUIRED a.0.20 X (line 12e) miCK CONSTRUCTION 14.CHECJfc'ALL THAT APPLY: Perm Pilings: Decking: maneiff lx Wood Wood Flotation Method (if used): Seasonal Concrete __ Metal Foam spaces spaces spaces spaces •y 2. spaces spaces ^spaces __ De-icing normally used Metal ____ Other____ Other__________________ Barrels Other___ * •% - ♦t- - 'X Page 4 of 6 MCENSE STANDARDS ADVISORY Businesses required to be licensed under Section 5.43 shall be subject to the requirements and performance standards of the B-2 Zoning District and per the following business use license standards: Insurance Required. Each business shall provide certification of liabiliw insurance coverage for the duration of the license period. A. B. C. Licenseholder. The primary business operator on the property shall be the licenseholder, and shall be responsible for notifying the City of any and all businesses subleased on the premises. Such secondary businesses shall not be separately licensed but shall be allowed only when in conformance with the provisions of the B-2 zoning district standards. Operation Standards. Each business licensee shall adhere to the following minimum operation standards: 1)Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring property. Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. except as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4) 5) The site shall be kept neat and orderly, and free of garbage. On land storage of boals .«?hall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. Parking and on-land storage of bo its, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the annual license application. Such site operation plan shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. 7)Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Business Use Licenses Limited to B-2 Zone. No business use shall be licensed in any zoning district other than B-2, except that when a business use is allowed by ordinance in another zoning district, such use conducted in said district shall not be required to obtain a license. License Revocation. Failure to adhere to the above business use license standards shall be cause for license suspension or revocation per the provisions of this chapter. Page 5 of 6 /. * ■■f ‘ /iTTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application; 1.CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. TTie drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage and required winter parking spaces. 2.CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. 3.Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION, 4.COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 $ ___^ Renewal Application @ $200.00 $ y^ Late Fee (if not postmarked by February 29) $100.00 $_________ J / "Lr(^ TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $K 'pA<' 0 CjC# ^^ /2 - 2. REVIEW PROCEDURE ^^ When a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application and will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE RY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform syety and qdde /wmpl^ance inspections. Authorized Signature Pc Date H'2 Title & -SID fr Ay r Relationship to Page 6 of 6 \ !• « I- 1. i ‘ r>.i» License Year 2000 I..* r CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, Crjstal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Phone 612-249-4600 to CityDate application sent to Marina \ 127100 Date application returned to City ANNUAL COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION - Pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.43, Subdivision 2 - Licensed Required. It is unlawful for any persons to engage or participate in business use without first having obtained a license therefor from the City. PLEASE COMPLETE ALL ITEMS AND SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION, REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, AND LICENSE APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY CLERK BY FEBRUARY 29 OF THE LICENSE YEAR. BUSINESS INFORMATION 1. 2. 3. BUSINESS OR TRADE NAME Street Address \K)^VQd|t!Ct*A Mailing Address ^__________________ Marina Phone OWNERSHIP/OPERATION Fee Owner (if different than above)_____ Address Office Phone Phone BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: (Check applicable item) ____ individual ownership ____ partnership corporation Li^ the name of each partner or corporate officer ^d their title:Asi the name or each partner or corporate otncer m ) Name of the marina manager responsible for daily operation: Page 1 of 6 S' ■h, r r 6. List the minimum number of employees on duty when the marina is open to the public during the boating season: 1 dock attendants __repair or service personnel j__ others available for sales/public information, etc. List every short or long term business occupant of the property other than the Business noted above; 4.PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY (Check all services offered): IPi^ipcioal Uses in-water slip rental sales of boats/motors/trailers/ marine accessories X boat repair and servicing ^ on-land boat storage ^ winter ^ summer marine fuel sales sale of bait and fishing tackle:x Conditional Uses (Conditional Use Permit is Reauiredl ____boat club ____public boat launching, on-demand ____public boat launching, transient charter boat port-of-call Accessory Uses ^ head pumpout ____ fishing tournament site sale of pre-pack'iged food diye shop clubhouse (for slip or boat club customers) lessons/teaching boat rental sailboard sales.'rental iceboat sales/rental ice fishing tackle sales cross-country ski sale/rental caretaker dwelling unit 5.BUSINESS SCHEDULE (Check appropriate items); 1 open all year open during boating season only PMList proposed hours of operation: dock access ^ AM to ^ retail sales ^ & service AM to PM MARINA SECURITY is provided by;^ CARETAKER living on site?------ Page 2 of 6 1 SLIPS AND BOAT UNITS List the maximum number of boats in each category. Each slip, mooring or other space actually used for storage or keeping of boats or watercraft must be indicated and numbered on the dock and site plan submitted with this application. r 7. 8. 9. 10. *! ' 11. Company Owned Rental Boats BOATS STORED IN THE WATER (for lake use) a.At dock slips Total Boats in Water I I IS % BOATS STORED ON LAND FOR LAKE USE a.Inside Buildings b.Outside on Racks c.• Outside - other means •Total Boats Stored on Land for Lake Use ____ TOTAL BOATS FOR LAKE USE (Add 7 and 8) OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (SUMMER) a.Transient boats (repair/service) b.New boats for sale (inventory) c.Used boats for sale (inventory) d.Other (list:) Total OTHER BOATS ON PREMISES (WINTER) a.Transient boats (repair/service) b.Contract storage (customer's boats) c.Inventory (new & used boats) d.Other (list:_____________ ) Total Page 3 of 6 Inside Building Inside Building Rental Slips/ Spaces Other Total Boats 9*5 SSl. %g 11 Outside Building ^OL. AO_ Total Outside Building Jo AQ_ 22^ Total h OFF.STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 12.SUMMER PARKING Retail sales/service customers 8 spaces minimum (+1 per each 800 s.f. over 1,000 s.f.) =0 spaces b.Boating customers 6 spaces per 10 boats for lake use [.6 x (line 9)] =O spaces c.Launching ramp customers (day use) JfS « 10 spaces minimum per ramp =-cj spaces ’ f %rv d.Charter boat port-of-call 1 space per each 3 seats of gross charter boat capacity [gross charter capacity x 0.33] =^ • spaces e.Total spaces required (add a, b, c, & d)\0^ spaces $Total spaces available per attached parking plan spaces *1 . 13.WINTER PARKING REQUIRED • • • V • •a.0.20 X (line 12e)spaces •• • fihr •». DOCK CONSTRUCTION 14.CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: Permanent ____ Seasonal Pilings; X Wood __Concrete Decking: ^ Wood X Metal Flotation Method (if used): __^ Foam f • I' • ^ De-icing normally used Metal ____ Other____ Other________;_________ Barrels Other___ Page 4 of 6 ATTACHMENTS The following must accompany this application: 1. 2. 3. 4. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/SITE PLAN/PARKING PLAN indicating the boundaries of the marina property and the authorized dock use area, the location of all structures, storage areas, docks, slips, buoys, launching ramps, gas pumps and tanks, parking areas, access areas, fencing and landscaping features. TTie drawing shall be updated each year to show all existing facilities, all changes from the previous season, and any changes proposed for the duration of the current application. The drawing shall also indicate the locations of winter storage zind required winter parking spaces. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE for the duration of the license period. Copy of your LMCD LICENSE APPLICATION. COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE APPLICATION FEE according to the current City fee schedule. Initial Application @ $300.00 $__________ Renewal Application @ $200.00 $ Late Fee (if not postmarked by February 29) $100.00 $ — TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION $ REVIEW PROCEDURE When a complete application is received, the City Council will review the license application and will thereafter pass upon the application per the licensing procedures of Chapter 5. THE MARINA MAY OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY UPON APPROVAL OF THE LICENSE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Pursuant to Section 5.43 of the Orono Municipal Code, the applicant hereby requests the Orono City Council to review this Marina License application, and agrees and authorizes the City of Orono and the City's designated employees or agents to enter upon the marina property at any reasonable time to perform safety and code compliaqce inspections. Authorized Signature Title Date ^^ Relationship to Owner Page 6 of 6 • • • • • • --- • • • -. • • • I --............ -·· ---· .. .,,,,. -•I • � .. ... . //' -·· .... . ' •• • . \ ;,-- { • L • ,r •Sattr 1c6 Oalll-bl�C. • --: � ,J I I I \ --- '""'l \ l J J . i . I J f f T '' tr , II • I 1•f 1 { .·--------------- • • • I\ f) .. l') r, ; R I ••� • • I . ,r'f c o u f'I ... . ' .. . .. --�-,JA .111111 � .... t I '. ' • ..... . . .. . • I.. ·, ... '' . ' ... .. ' .. . ... . ,, --: .. ,. . ..... --........--· \ • {)-7S : .. 'PA�KfAJC, / HA.e.cc.oveP... ft.AN ( At>Af� FlloM. e;</(f J?.ITS . l,J l-1 IC l·\ W As A r PRV V e r e R. • I ' I t /"=s o ' -� • ,, . . • \ • -I • . •• ' . .. • ! I • ' • ••••? • 1 I • I - . I I t f I I I I I l .• I I Q -;i. •. . . I . . . .. . .1 .• ..1. .. , . ... . . il: . •: ., : . . . .• I ·---· •·• o • • • I I • I • i ' . .. ' • I .'. •i ♦ ♦ . . t . . . � ' ' I I . ' . . '. ' . . . . .I • I I;•·, . .. ' . . •. : . ...... ' ' I e • REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION meeting SEP 2 5 2000 DATE: Ai ast ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Services Director’s Report Item Description: Navarre Municipal Parking Lot Paving The Council previously directed staff to initiate a project to repave the Navarre Municipal Parking Lot. Council approval of funding for this project is required. The existing pavement is in poor condition, mainly because of the age of the pavement, but the underlying base appears to be structurally sound. We are recommending reclaiming the existing pavement and regrading the parking lot. The existing profile of the lot is uneven and there are cracks in the pavement. If the pavement is simply overlain, the existing uneven profile and cracks will be reflected through the new pavement. In the reclaiming process, a reclaiming machine is used to break up the pavement into small pieces that can be graded to a smooth profile. This process also eliminates reflective cracking through the new pavement. The project costs include funding for additional aggregate base that may need to be added if soft spots are discovered in the existing base after reclaiming. Midwest Asphalt Company will be completing this work for the bid prices that we obtained through our annual competitive bidding process for road materials and street overlays. A cost summary is listed below. Reclaim Pavement and Grade Lot $10,000 Overlay Parking Lot $35,000 Additional Aggregate Base $5,000 Total Cost $50,000 The new parking lot light install ; h>i3 is tentatively scheduled for the week of September 28“* with reclaiming and repaving scheduled for the week of October 2"^. The parking lot will need to be closed when the reclaiming and repaving is completed. We will be installing advance warning signs at the three lot entrances to alert people about the lot closing and will notify the businesses. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve reclaiming and repaving of the Navarre Municipal Parking Lot at a cost of $50,000 to be funded from the "Infrastructure (road/bridge) projects" component of the PIR fund and approval of a budget adjustment to reflect this expenditure. h' fi r > COl iNnil MEETINQ SEP 2 5 2000REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY U»- OHO/VO DATE: August 28, 2000 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Services Director’s Report Item Description: Request for Payment ^1, East Long Lake/Fox Ridge Sanitary Sewer Project We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Payment ^1, East Long Lake/Fox Ridge Sanitary Sewer Project to Minneomm Inc. in the amount of $65,379.00 -i BON'tfSTROO ROSENE ANDERL1K3 ^6316361311 09/19/00 09:06 0 :02/05 N0:094 s 1 !'! I/U Bentstroo Cflllos«nc ««AndefUfc& |\||AMactaites inginMn A Af chlttcti Owner City of Orono. 2750 Kelly Pkwy.. Crvatal Bay. MN 5S323O066 Date: September 18,2000 For Period:7/11/2000 to 8/18/2000 Request No: 1 Contractor Minncorrmi. 1B4BShadv Acres Lane. Mora. MN 55051 ?•!.» RIQUI8T FOR PAYMBNT EAST LONQ LAKE SANITARY SEWER BRA FILE NO. 139-89-106 •1;; •V; •? ! I I'ST* SUMMARY 1 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 e 10 11 12 Original Contract Amount Change Order - Addition Change Order • OeducUon Reused Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned Leaf Retalnage 5% Subtotal Lata Amount Paid Previously Uquidaled damages • AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. S 218.730.00 a *1* ••I $ Recommended for Approval by. BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERUK A ASSOCIATES, INC, Approved by Contractor MINNCOMM Specified Contract Completion Date: _____ October 1,^2000 0.00 . 0.00 $ ..PI . 218.730.00 : $ S 68.820.00 0.00 %88.820.00^^' s 3.441.00 ^ $66.378.00 •-= $0.00 - $0.00 :f $BS 379 00 Approved by Owner CITY OF ORONO . 1! •i.1 fi • {.‘1 It .1! ■J3 ■li •vl.!•«c« •*1 ii •ii! * ii- ill-r Date: •.» •hV* i;i •fi •iji ‘1? .13 ‘ tM •W* BONiSTROO ROSENE ANDERL1K3 ©6516361311 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 94 Itotn Part 1 • Fox Ridga • Sanitiry Sawar M/2” HOPE, SDR 11 dirtctional driHad r HOPE. SDR 11 dlrtcdenal drilled 2" HOPE, SDR 11 trench or directional drUad VIM" HOPE, aarvica pipe SDR 11 diractional driliad 1*1/4" HDPE, aarvica pipe SDR 11 trench or directional drilled 1*1/4" curb atop and box Connect to axisting gravity manhole 8 2" laolation va^a 9 Mater manhole 10 Air release manhole Fluahing Connaclion Termination nusliitig Connection Clear and Qrub Total Part 1 • Fox Ridge • Sanitary Sawar Part 2 • Pox Ridga Reetoration Bitumlnoua driveway realoration Qravel driveway repair BKuminout atreel patching SRi fenoe, regular Concrete driveway restoration Remove and transplant irae'Canflarous Remove and transplant Uaa*dedduous Ramove and transplant bushes Sodding, lawn type MnDOT Seed Mix 80A Wood fiber blanket Furnish and plant evergreen tree (blue apruoe) 6' high Furnish and plant shade tree (sugar ma^) 4" diameter Total Part 2 • Fox Ridge Restoration Part 3 > Eaat Long Lake Sanitary M/2" HDPE, SDR 11 trench or ctiractiontt difll r HDPE. SDR 11 dbeeilonal drilled 2" HDPE, SDR 11 trench or directional drOed 1*1/4’ HDPE. service pipe SDR 11 directional drilled 1-1/4" HDPE, servioe pipe SDR 11 trench or directional drilled 1 *1/4’ curb stop and box Connect to existing gravity manhole 11/2" isolalion valve 2 * isolation valve Insulals sanitary sewer, 2" thick Meter manhole Air releaae MH Rushing Connection Termination flushing Connection Clear and Qrub Total Part 3 * East Long Lake Sanitary Sevwr Part 4 * East Long Lake Reetoration Biuminous driveway restoration Qravel driveway repair Bituminous street patching sat fanoe, regular Concrete driveway restoration Remove and transplant tree-oonferous Remove and Iranapiant tree-deciduous Remove and transplant bushes Sodding, lawn type MnDOT Seed Mix 80A Wood nber blanket Furnish and plant evergreen tree (blue spruce) 6 ’ high Furnish and plant shade tree (sugar ma^) 4* diameter Total Part 4 • East Long Lake Restoratim 09/19/00 09:06 0 :03/05 N0:094 Contieet Unit Quantity Amount Unit Quantity Price to Data to Date LF 260 12.00 210 S2.S20.00 LF 910 14.00 850 511,900.00 LF 1960 14.00 1850 525,900.00 LF 170 18.00 SO 5900.00 LF 160 16.00 50.00 EA 17 490.00 50.00 EA 1 3990.00 •50.00 EA 3 1660.00 50.00 EA 1 8100.00 50.00 EA 1 5700.00 50.00 EA 2 2300.00 50.00 EA 1 2260.00 50.00 LS 1 4000.00 50.00 •$41,220.00 SY 200 30.00 80.00 SY 70 10.00 $0.00 SY 80 33.00 $0.00 LF 350 3.00 $0.00 8F 190 6.00 $0.00 EA 6 160.00 $0.00 EA 8 176.00 $0.00 EA 20 60.00 $0.00 SY 2000 4.00 $0.00 AC 1 $0.00 SY 120 2.00 $0.00 EA 9 310.00 $0.00 EA 9 700.00 $0.00 • $0.00 LF 870 13.00 670 $11,310.00 LF 820 15.00 800 $12,000.00 LF 325 15.00 250 $3,750.00 LF 70 1&00 30 $540.00 LF 140 18.00 $0.00 EA 11 460.00 $0.00 EA 1 4135.00 $0.00 EA 1 1600.00 $0.00 EA 2 iseaoo $0.00 SY 20 9.00 $0.00 EA 1 8100.00 $0.00 EA 1 6660.00 $0.00 EA 1 2300.00 $0.00 EA 2 2280.00 $0.00 LS 1 ^.00 $27,600.00 SY 100 30.00 $0.00 SY 60 10.00 $0.00 8Y 20 33.00 80.00 LF 250 3.00 $0.00 8F 90 5.00 $0.00 EA 4 160.00 $0.00 EA 4 175.00 $0.00 EA 10 60.00 $0.00 SY 2100 4.00 $0.00 AC 1 0.00 $0.00 SY 110 2.00 $0.00 EA 4 310.00 $0.00 EA 4 700.00 $0.00 $0.00 I,. ••j•V! i:* I ••e : i I A •i •-J ri •I •I *.* .•* •. I •I -• •I !• in I • I . .• •••••• !• •# .1 *I«• J* !«* i! I BOnIsTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK3 ^ 6516361311 09/19/00 09:06 0 :04/05 N0:094 y yr hvm Unit Contnet UiiR ChiantHy Quantity Pfica toOatn Amount to Date Total Pan 1 - Fox RMgo - Sanitary Sowar Total Part 2 - Fox Ridga Raatoratlon Total Part 3 • Eaat Lens Lake Sanitary Sawor Total Part 4 • East Long Lake Raatoratlon S41 .220.00 $0.00 $27,600.00 $0.00 Total Work Complotad To Data $66,620.00 .11 ■[* •V I.' if: '•I t.i •1?! H* 1ii :’l .‘•I .jti t •n: •;inv\ •.•jf 11 1' •■ii.n i. ■1: i•3 •i.1 I •I'J t I* .. 0*. • V .T. ■f- !: ■•S-. ’A'h ■i I* •J •D. ■|I ■.— BONisTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK3 @6516361311 09/19/00 09:06 0 :05/05 NO:094 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF ORONO BRA FILE NO. 139-BB-10S CONTRACTOR MINNCOMM CHANGE ORDERS TottI Payment to Date S6S.37fl.OO Original Contract S218.730.00 Retainaoe Pay No.1 3.441.00 Change Ordere Total Amount Earned S08.820.00 Ravlead Gontraet $218,730.00 ■'i.T . i.1 •!*: fi* !•" .>1 •f* !•! » ;1 •!1 ■.-1:!li No.Date Deacrfptlon Amount •u . • • .* • Total Change Ordari Ht ■i PAYMENT SUMMARY e a a % 6i*M •i* t; No.From To Payment Retalnaga Completed 1 07/11/2000 00/1 8A)0 05,379.00 3.441.00 00,020.00 •. e a ^• 'j!- *• p Matarfal on Hand e •a ■1 li :i!! Si ■A II 1.; ti •i? A ■t *!•4 I 'irr r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION tMcii. meeting SEP 2 5 2000 Cl I Y UHO/VO DATE: September 22, 2000 ITEM NO:/c Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse If/)City Administrator's Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Scheduling of Council Work Session There are three topics for Council review and discussion at upcoming work sessions. 1.The annual City Administrator performance review. 2.The review of a new residential Planned Unit Development district being developed by staff that gives the Council zoning flexibility to enable housing options such as senior housing. 3.A review of the results of the Police Department organizational review being conducted by PDI, and the review of the Police Chief position profile that will be at least partially based on the results of the organization review. Potential work session dates are as follows: Thursday, October 5, 7:30 a.m. Thursday, October 12,7:30 a.m. Thursday, October 19,7:30 a.m. Thursday, October 26,7:30 a.m. The October 26 date is the only Thursday morning that works for Harry Bnill in terms of the organizational review and the position profile. It would be helpful to finalize the position profile earlier if an earlier date can be found that works for both the Council and Harry. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to select dates and limes for upcoming Council work sessions. *! COIIKJOII MPETING SEP 2 5 2000 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION cn Y ur OHONO DATE: September 22, 2000 ITEM NO:// Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Police Chief Selection Process - Update and Discussion Harry Brull of PDI will attend the September 25 Council meeting to update the Council on the Police Chief selection process and schedule. This will include a discussion regarding the timing and format of the interview process, as w'ell as clarification of who will participate in the interv iew process. I have attached a letter from Harry Brull which sets out the next steps of the selection process. Interview Process It is my understanding that the full Council wants to serve as an interview panel to interview the semi-finalist candidates. The Council has also discussed inviting the mayors of the contract cities to participate on the interview panel. In addition, there has been some discussion about whether to include a number of community leaders in the selection process. Harry Brill has indicated that the mayors of Long Lake and Minnetonka Beach would like to meet the candidates prior to a selection decision being made, but do not wish to participate in the formal interview process. We have also indicated that a committee of police staff representatives would have an opportunity to interview the candidates. I would also like to have a separate opportunity to interview the candidates. Given these parameters, the candidate review process could include the following elements; 1.City Council serves as an interview panel to inter\’iew each of the semi-final candidates. 2.A committee of police staff representatives serve as an interview panel to interview each of the candidates. 3.The City Administrator interviews each of the candidates. 4.A reception is held to provide an opportunity for the contract city mayors, community leaders, and the Orono department heads to meet the candidates. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Council provide direction regarding the elements and timing of the Police Chief selection process. i j PDI PERSONNEL DECISIONS INTERNATIONAL M EMO DATE: TO: From: SUBJECT: 21 September 2000 Orono Mayor and Council c/o City Administrator Harry Brull Police Chief Recruitment and Organizational Audit Process f- ii- I am writing to update you on the process and to alert you of the next steps and your involvement. The recruitment is well imderway. Applications close October 31. This date was necessary because of national publication schedules. I have met with two of the three other mayors and am scheduled to meet with the police department on Oaober 2. In addition to statewide and nationsd advertising, we have sent a personal letter to every police chief in Minnesota asking him/her to nominate individuals. Like you, I want to make the chief’s selection during the 2000 calendar year. In order to meet this aggressive timetable, I am asking you to consider your availabiUty for the next steps in the process. Following our receipt of applications and request for additional information, we will narrow the field to approximately six semi-finaliks. These individuals will be invited to Orono. Usually at this point, the mayor and council (or a search committee) would wish to interview candidates. This activity would require approximately six to seven hours and could be accomplished in a single day or over two evenings. I would also plan for the candidates to interview with representatives from the department and the city administrator. At this point, I need your decision as to whether you wish to interview semi-finalist candidates, and your availability to conduct these interviews on one of the following dates: Saturday, November 11; Monday, November 13; Tuesday, November 14; Wednesday, November 15; or Thursday, November 16. I have also agreed to come to a council session on Monday, October 26 to share the results of the organizational audit and a draft of the position profile. After the semi-finalists’ visit, finalist selection would commence. I would anticipate a very brief meeting within a day or two of the semi-finalists’ visit. At that point, PDI would conduct an in-depth evaluation/reference checking/background investigation of designated finalists. This information would then be shared with you. A r that point, you may be in a position to make a decision, or you may wish to re-interview one or more finalists Given the schedule, I would anticipate having information regarding the finalists available to you no later than Thursday, December 7. This would provide enough flexibUity regarding the final step in the process. rr- *: ■■■ PERSO^NEL decisions INTERNATIONAL As I mentioned, I have met with the mayors of Minnetonka Beach and Long Lake. Both would like an opportunity to meet candidates before a selection, but do not wish to sit with you in a formal interview process. Please discuss this plan among yourselves and let me know what works best for you. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you and the City of Orono. « REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MCgTlNG StP 2 5 2000 CITY Uh QHONU DATE: September 22, 2000 ITEM NO:/a Department Approval: Name Lin Vee O Title City Clerk , Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: List of Licenses for CoHmcil Approval Agenda Section: Licenses GAMBLING (RESOLUTION) 1.Mound Westonka Hockey Association, Inc. - Resolution The Narrows Saloon, 3380 Shoreline Drive COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. FT A RESOLUTION GRANTING A GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT FOR THE NARROWS SALOON LOCATED AT 3380 SHORELINE DRIVE BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Orono agrees to approve the gambling permit application for the Mound Westonka Hockey Association, Inc. for operations at The Narrows Saloon, 3380 Shoreline Drive. The above listed resolution was moved by and duly seconded by________________________ The following Council Members voted in the affirmative: The following Council Members voted in tlie negative: Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of September, 2000. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk I. b Minnesota Lawful Gambhng Premises Permit Application - LG214 Class of Permit Check one; Class A - S400 Pull-tabs, tipboaras, paddlewheels, raffles, bingo FOR BOARD USE ONLY Base U ___ Check# ppn Initials Fee -. Dale Page 1 of 3 1/99 -^^*Class B - S250 Pull-tabs, tipboards, paddlewheels, raffles Class C - S200 Bingo only OR bingo and pull-tabs when total gross receipts do not exceed $50,000 per year I I Class 0 - $150 Raffles only Organization Information Organization name (as it appears on documentation filed with Minnesota Secretary of State or Internal Revenue Service) Base license number Name of chief executive officer (cannot be' your gambling manager) IT. Daytime phone number Gambling Premises Information Name of establishment where gambling will be conducted Street address (do not use a P.O. box number) City & county where oambhna ofemises is located-OR-Tnwn^in a rrnintv w/horo namhiin^ity & county where gambling premises is localed-OR-Township & county where gambling premises is located if outside city limits Is the premises located within city limits? RL Ye^ lized No If No, is township: Orga- Unorganized Unincorporated yot^^rj^ization own the building where the gambling will be conducted? Yes If no, attach(1) the appropriate lawful gambling lease form, and ______________________(2) the sketch of all leased areas with dimensions and square footage clearly defined A lease and sketch are not required tor class u applications. Wameof legal owner of premises Address City State/ZioU6M Address(es) of Storage Space of Gambling Equipment List all locations where used and unused gambling product is stored. Do not use a P.O. box number. (Attach an additiona sheet if necessary.) City State/Zio Questions? Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 651-639-4000. If you use a TTY, you can call the Board by using the Minnesota Relay Service at 1-800-627-3529 and ask to place a call to 651-639-4000. This form '*.ill be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. Pf Premises Permit Application - LG214 Page 2 of 3 1/99 Bingo Occasions - for Class A or C Permits If applying for a clau A or C permit, enter days and beginning/ending hours of bingo occasions (indicate /V.M. or P.M.). No more than ten bingo occasions may be conducted per week. An occasion must be at least one and one-half hours no to exceed four hours. Day Beoinnino/EndinQ Hours ____ _________to_________ ______________to_________ Beqinninq/EndinQ Hours _________to_________ _________to_________ ___to_________ Pay Beginnino/EndinQ Hours ____ _________to_________ ______________to________ _______________to Gambling Bank Account Information Bank name Bank account number' Bank address City State/Zip code •New organizations: The account number may be obtained and submitted to the Gambling Control Board within ten dc.ys you receive your premises permit. Name, address, and title of members authorized to sign checks from the gambling account. The organization’s treasurer may not handle gambling funds. Name Address Title Acknowledgment Gambling site authorization I hereby consent that local law enforcement officers, the board or agents of the board, or the commissioner of revenue or public safety or agents of the commissioners, may enter the premises to enforce the law. Bank records information The board is authorized to inspect the bank records of the gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill requirements of current gambling rules and law. 0.^.1^’ ration license authorization I hereby authorize the Gambling Control Board to modify the class of organization license to be consistent with the class of permit being applied for. Oath I declare that: 1.1 have read this application and all information submitted to the board is true, accurate, and complete; 2.all other required information has been fully disclosed; 3.1 am the chief executive officer of the organization; 4.I assume full responsibility for the fairand lawful operation of all activities to be conducted; 5.1 will familiarize myself with the laws of Mirviesota governing lawful gambling and rules of the board and agree, if licensed, to abide by those 'aws and rules, including amendments to them; 6.any changes ir application information will be submitted to the board and local unit of government within ten days of the change; and 7.1 understand that failure to provide required information or providing false or misleading information may result in the denial or revocation of Jhe license. iatuiy of cp^l executive officer (Designee may not sign)Date ha I n V City p 1e ca 10· S--•&• II tab ati at th don, hal ound lo CITY OF ORONO Check Summary Register /3 C p~^r Tu^d^Olleplamber 19,2000 ‘^"''OKobo.V o Name Check Date Check Amt ^ ' lu k 10100 Primary Cash Paid Chk« 062340 Void 9/25/2000 $0.00 Paid Chk# 062341 ACKERMANN. AL 9/25/2000 $156.38 Paid Chk# 062342 BONESTROO ROSENE & ASSOC.9/25/2000 $21,941.00 Paid Chk« 062343BYERS. CAROLYN N 9/25/2000 $51.20 Paid Chk« 062344 DICKEY. NORMA JE^N 9/25/2000 $112.00 Paid Chk# 062345 DOBOS 9/25/2000 $240.46 Paid Chk# 062346 ERICSON, BARBARA Ee 9/25/2000 $128.58 Paid Chk# 062347 FERRIL. ELANORL 9/25/2000 $64.00 Paid Chk» 062348 FINN. DORIE 9/25/2000 $48.00 Paid Chk# 062349 FITZPATRICK, JOAN 9/25/2000 $112.00 Paid Chk# 062350 FORD CONSTRUCTION 9/25/20C0 $66,953 05 Paid Chk# 062351 FROMMELT. CAROLE L 9/25/2000 $64.00 Paid Chk# 062352 GANT2. INEZ 9/25/200C $57.60 Paid Chk# 062353 HOLM. ARNE 9/25/2000 $57.60 Paid Chk# 062354 HOUTMAN. KRISTINE 9/25/2000 $96.00 Paid Chldl^ 062355 JELLISON, SUSAN 9/25/2000 $51.20 Paid Chk# 062356 LANDBERG. GALE R 9/25/2000 $112.00 Paid Chk# 062357 LARSON. JOHN 9/25/2000 $108.80 Paid Chk# 062358 LATHROP, LEE G.9/25/2000 $96.00 Paid Chk# 062359 MABUSTH. JEANNE 9/25/2000 $108.80 Paio Chk# 062360 MILLER RALPH E.9/25/2000 $60.80 Paid Chk# 062361 O’MALLEY. PHYLLIS E.9/25/2000 $139.00 Paid Chk# 062362 ROUFS. JOCELYN 9/25/2000 $57.60 Paid Chk# 062363SCHUELLER, PAUL J 9/25/2000 $51.20 Paid Chk# 062364 SHEMANER. JOYCE 9/25/2000 $139.00 Paid Chk# 062365 SHERF. JULIE 9/25/2000 $108.80 Paid Chk# 062366 SPILSETH. PAT 9/25/2000 $64.00 Paid Chk# 062367 STINSON. MARY A.9/25/2000 $60.80 Paid Chk# 062368 STUBBS. CHERRY 9/25/2000 $64.00 Paid Chkf^ 062369 THORNE. MARILYN B.9/25/2000 $64.00 Paid Chk# 062370 TOWARD. HELEN 9/25/2000 $96.00 P?id Chk# 062371 VALITON, SALLY 9/25/2000 $57.60 Paid Chk# 062372 WETT, MARGE 9/25/2000 $60.80 Paid Chk# 0623^3 WETT. RICHARD 9/25/2000 $54.40 Paid Chk# 062374 WOLVERTON. WES 9/25/2000 $64.00 Paid Chk# 062376 ALL STAR PRO GOLF 9/25/2000 $276.80 Paid Chk# 062377 AMSTERDAM PRINING AND LITHO 9/25/2000 $94.96 Paid Chk# 062378 ANDERSON. DARRELL 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 Paid Chk# 062379 ANDERSON. GILBERT 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 Paid Chk# 062380 BEACK. SCOTT 9/25/2000 $150.00 Paid Chk# 062231 BEAUCHAINE, J 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 Paid Chk# 062382 BEERNINK, LESTER 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 Paid Chk# 062383 BLACKOWIAK & SON 9/25/2000 $567 49 Paid Chk# 062384 BONESTROO ROSENE & ASSOCe 9/25/2000 $9,587.33 Paid Chk# 062385 BRINKHAUS. JACK 9/25/2000 $30.23 Paid Chk# 062386 BUDGET PRINTING 9/25/2000 $295.03 Paid Chk# 062387 BUTTERFIELD. L L & P R 9/25/^000 $5,000.00 Paid Chk# 062388 CASHMORE, JEANNE 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 Paid Chk# 062389 CHAMPION AUTO STORES 9/25/2000 $12.75 Name Paid Chk# 062390 CITY OF LONG LAKE Check Date Check Amt iitt&' ¥ ; i J t b Paid Chk# 062391 Paid Chk# 062392 Paid Chk# 062393 Paid Chk# 062394 Paid Chk# 062395 Paid Chk# ^^-'396 Paid Chk# 062397 Paid Chk# 062398 Paid Chk# 062399 Paid Chk# 062400 Paid Chk# 062401 Paid Chk# 062402 Paid Chk# 062403 Paid Chk# 062404 Paid Chk# 062405 Paid Chk# 062406 Paid Chk# 062407 Paid Chk# 062406 Paid Chk# 062409 Paid Chk# 062410 Paid Chk# 062411 Paid Chk# 062412 Paid Chk# 062413 Paid Chk# 062414 Paid Chk# 062415 Paid Chk# 062416 Paid Chk# 06241? Paid Chk# 062418 Paid Chk# 062419 Paid Chk# 062420 Paid Chk# 062421 Paid Chk# 062422 Paid Chk# 062423 Paid Chk# 062424 Paid Chk# 062425 Paid Chk# 062426 Paid Chk# 062427 Paid Chk# 062428 Paid Chk# 062429 Paid Chk# 062430 Paid Chk# 062431 Paid Chk# 062432 Paid Chk# 062433 Paid Chk# 062434 Paid Chk# 062435 Paid Chk# 062436 Paid Chk# 062437 Paid Chk# 062438 Paid Chk# 062439 Paid Chk# 062440 Paid Chk# 062441 Paid Chk# 062442 Paid Chk# 062443 Paid Chk# 062444 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL ELEC. COST. MARGARET CROWN MARKING INC. DAHLGREN SHARDLOW & UBAN DANIELS. J. DAYTON. TJ&M DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE T^CH INC ERICKSON. KURT EULL’S MANUFACTURING CO. INC. EXPRESS MESSENGER FADDEN. PHYLLIS FULLERTON. ROBERT & CAROLINE G & K SERVICES GALL’S INC. GENUINE PARTS CO. GERMUNDSEN. MARGARET GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. HACK. R & B HAMMAN. BETTY HAWES. JACK & JULIE HEADRICK M C & L S HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF HINSHAW & CULBERTSON HOUG. JAMES & SUSAN lALEFI IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS INTERSTATE BATTERIES JILLSON. PAULA & GEOFFREY JOHNSON S. & M. ,ON. BRAD JGi iNSON. BYRON & THERESA JOHNSON. R & S KD & COMPANY KEARNEY. A 8. P KIRKMAN. D E & J M KRUEGER. KEVIN KUSTOM SIGNALS INC LA PEAN. RICHARD & MARI LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER LAKE MANAGEMNT INC. LANDBERG. ALVIN W JR LARSON. FRANK & JENNIFER LOGIS LYTLE. P & V M-R SIGN CO. INC MAPET MDS MATRX MEDICAL INC MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS MIDWEST ASPHALT MINNCOMM - UTIL 9/25/2000 $40,950.00 9/25/2000 $160.00 9/25/2000 $132.54 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2^00 $27.56 9/25/2000 $1,478.96 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $263.01 9/25/2000 $159.75 9/25/2000 $529.50 9/25/2000 $5839 9/25/2000 $492.44 9/25/2000 $105.17 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $151.71 9/25/2000 $277.98 9/25/2000 $211.17 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $80.00 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/26/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $150.00 9/25/2000 $5,467.63 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $50.00 9/25/2000 $47.08 9/25/2000 $31.95 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $20.10 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $175.00 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $125.14 9/25/2000 $5,0C0.00 9/25/2000 $3574 9/25/2000 $150.00 9/25/2000 $737.00 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $3,988.32 9/25/2000 $5,000.00 9/25/2000 $596 59 9/25/2000 $2500 9/25/2000 $75.13 9/25/2000 $19,308.00 9/25/2000 $3,338.62 9/25/2000 $65,379.00 Name Check Date Check Amt F >*il Paid Chk# 062445 Paid Chk# 062446 Paio Chk# 062447 Paid Chk# 062448 Paid Chk# 062449 Paid Chk# 062450 Paid Chk# 062451 Paid Chk# 062452 Paid Chk# 062453 Paid Chk# 062454 Paid Chk# 062455 Paid Chk# 062456 Paid Chk# 062457 Paid Chk# 062458 Paid Chk# 062459 Paid Chk# 062460 Paid Chk# 062461 Paid Chldl^ 062462 Paid Chk# 062463 Paia Chk# 062464 Paid Chk# 062465 Paid Chk# 062466 Paid Chk# 062467 Paid Chk# 062468 Paid Chk# 062469 Paid Chk# 062470 Paid Chk# 062471 Paid Chk# 062472 Paid Chk# 062473 Paid Chk# 062474 Paid Chk# 062475 Paid Chk# 062476 Paid Chk# 062477 Paid Chk# 062478 Paid Chk# 062479 Paid Chk# 062480 Paid Chk# 062481 Paid Chk# 062482 Paid Chk# 062483 Paid Chk# 062484 Paid Chk# 062485 Paid Chk# 062486 Paid Chk# 062487 Paid Chk# 062488 Paid Chk# 062489 Paid Chk# 062490 Paid Chk# 062491 Paid Chk# 062492 Paid Chk# 062493 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY MN DEPT OF REVENUE MOOS. SARA MORISON, LUCIA T NAVARRE HARDWARE Void NEOPOST NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP OMAN. LYLE OMEARA. WiaiAM & MARY OTT. MICHAEL PAULSON. JEROME & JUDY PEDERSON. DENNIS & KAREN PERSONIUS. STEVEN PETERSON. CHARLES PHELPS. D S & E D POLANSKY.SM&EW POTTINGA, JETSE & URSULA POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. PRECISION TURF PRESTIGE FLAG PULA. RICHARD QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC. RAKOS. K & GUSTAFSON. M RED PEDERSON UTILITIES. INC REED VENDING RILEY. CARL RINEHART. RICHARD RITCHIE. EDWIN JR SAGEHORN. JOHN SAMUELS. NANCY TEMPLE SHAUGHNESSY LAWN SERVICES SIGNS OF THE SEASON SNYDER DRUG STORES STANTON GROUP STATE TREASURER STURMAN. LOIS SULLIVAN’S UTILITY SERV. INC. TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI THE COURT INTERPRETER PROGRAM THEISTE. NORMAN VEE, LIN VICKERMAN. RUTH ANNE VOLDEN E & DUCHARME C W.W GRAINGER INC. WARNING LITES OF MN WIENS. ROBERT & JULIE WINTERNHEIMER. ALISSA WYER, DAVID & ANN 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25.7003 9/25.7000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 Total Checks $31.50 $2,835 00 $5.000 00 $5,000.00 $360 19 $0.00 $345.00 $98.83 $91.64 $5.000 00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5.000 00 $1.748 33 $58.58 $223.49 $5,000.00 $3,788.39 $5,000.00 $2,475.00 $52.10 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,928.97 $42.60 $200.61 $195.30 $60.00 $5,000.00 $660.00 $85.55 $5.00 $5.000 00 $33.35 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $170.88 $10895 $5.000 00 $150 00 $5.000 00 $523,243.00 CITY OF ORONO Paid Register 09/20/00 9 03 AM Page 1 m Check Employee Number Number Employee Name Pay Period 040147 048148 048143 048144 048145 048146 048149 048150 048151 048152 048153 048154 048155 048156 048157 048158 048159 048160 048161 048162 048163 048164 048165 048166 048167 048168 048169 048170 048171 048172 048173 048174 048175 048176 048177 048178 048179 048180 048181 048182 048183 048184 048185 048186 048187 048188 477546587 474864959 477700023 475080704 468629488 472500574 472906755 469783642 471688060 474563339 476921815 473925115 468843008 472503991 469526026 475909721 472529007 475907748 468701868 470089708 471569863 397705677 458482592 468780454 480843542 334506281 471487919 470566529 474663296 4707049C4 476063409 469983292 472642666 521921879 469686562 398646989 474664219 470700901 468136521 471115918 475443862 471664106 JOHNSON. MARY ANN DODGE, RACHEL M. VOID VOID VOID VOID MOORSE, RONALD J. STURMAN. HEIDI N. VEE, LINDA S. KUEHN, THOMAS M. OLSON. RONALD J. PETTIT. SANDRA K. ANDERSON, BRUCE L. BOBZIEN. SUE A. BORIS. SCOTT W. BUDIG, STACIE M, CARLSON. MICHAEL B. CHESWICK. GARY B, CORNICK. JAMES L DEMBOUSKI. JAY C. ERICKSON. KURT R FARNIOK. CORREY L. FISCHENICH. DAN T. FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K. JOHNSON. BRADLEY P. JOHNSON, JEFFREY MADSON. ADRIENNE M. MCNALLY. STEVEN A. MCNICHOLS. DAVID L MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES PERSELL, WILLIAM R. SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B. TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F. TOMCZYK.MARKW. WITTKE. ANTHONY A. HENDRICKS. RONALD J. BOTTENBERG. WENDY C. DAVIS. MARC L GAFFRON. MICHAEL P. GAPPA. GREGORY A. MEYER. WILLIAM C. OMAN. LYLE E. PE^’CE. CHRISTOPHER M. WEINBERGER. PAUL E. BRINKHAUS. JOHN F. DEBAERE. DONALD L 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 Pay Group Check Check Description Amount Date Status BI-WEEKLY S646.33 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $951.78 9/20/00 Outstanding $0.00 9/20/00 Void $0 00 9/20/00 Void $0.00 9/20/00 Void $0.00 9/20/00 Void BI-WEEKLY $1,661.29 9/20/00 Outsta. <*ng BI-WEEKLY $712.13 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,220.55 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,394.47 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $30.42 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-Vi/EEKLY $376.44 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $526.93 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $676.67 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,010.92 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $663.57 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $32263 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,568.91 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,316.19 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,381.22 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,683.33 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEC TY $1,674.44 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,330.91 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,464.35 9/20/00 Outstanding /JI-WEEKLY $1,358.35 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,083.60 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $542.57 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,279.82 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $647.68 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,747.27 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $106 14 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,319.02 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $54954 9/20/00 Outstanding Bi-WEEKLY $1,372.22 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $945.3.9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $58632 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,079.03 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1.17605 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,187.30 9/20.'00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,656.05 0/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $52322 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $93.71 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $99406 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,263 23 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $1,183.83 9/20/00 Outstanding BI-WEEKLY $881.27 9/20/00 Outstanding L. CITY OF ORONO Paid Register 09/20/00 9;03 AM Page 2 Check Employee Number Number Employee Name 048189 048190 048191 048192 048193 048194 048195 048196 048197 048198 048199 048200 048201 048202 048203 048204 048205 048206 474667812 477500666 468909535 476783251 469848107 473748173 469629194 470204924 471302023 470383444 475344512 473108428 476388054 473609629 475569177 470369762 589280294 474251147 GREGORY. JAMES D. HANSEN. STEVEN OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G. OBRIEN. RANDY L PALMER. GREGORY A. RATHBUN. BARRY J. SKREEN, DALE S. ABRAHAMSON. FRED W. BIX. MILTON. H. BLAIR. JANISA. MCINTYRE. WILLIAM E. OAS, DANIEL O. PEICKERT. GARY J. ROSS. JOHN A. STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD STORK. JOHN T. COOPER. ROBERT M. NICKESON. ANDREW K. Pay Period Pay Group Description Check Amount Check Date Status 19 BI-WEEKLY $774.16 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WFEKLY $1,158.17 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $631.07 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $454.53 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $759.52 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $998.03 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $776.51 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $180.90 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $138.15 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $78.01 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $108.53 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKl.Y $191.30 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $289.69 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $106.59 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $1,242.08 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $294.09 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $243.33 9/20/00 Outstanding 19 BI-WEEKLY $86.68 9/20/00 Outstanding $50,700.49 --- -■ t’‘. CITY OF ORONO Check Summary Register Name Check Date Wednesday, September 2C, 2000 Page 1 of 1 Check Amt 10100 Primary Cash Paid Chk« 062495 CiTY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 9/20/00 $7,529.00 Paid Chk# 062496 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 9/20/00 $18,239.12 Paid Chk« 062497 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 9/20/00 $300.00 Paid Chk* 062498 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 9/20/00 $462.00 Paid Chk* 062499 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT 9/20/00 $190.12 Paid Chk* 062500 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 9/20/00 $3,762.64 Paid Chidl 062501 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 9/20/00 $1,772.68 Paid Chk* 062502 PEBSCO/OBRA 9/20/00 $194.30 Paid Chk* 062503 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 9/20/00 $2,590.00 Paid Chk* 062504 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9/20/00 $10,629.48 Paid Chk* 062505 UNITED WAY 9/20/00 $28.00 Paid Chk* 062506 WISCONSIN SCTF 9/20/00 $184.62 Total Checks $45,881.96 \ -Ilf nil r ' ‘'i I' '■pfc-f i.. POf »*P|=TfNQ SEP 2 5 2000 Cl I y Uh OtiONO EST’ORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COMMrii K*t?ET\MG SEP 5 2000 OF Qi»y ur* Oho NU I Mary Liz Holberg state Representative District 37B Dakota and Scott Counties Lin Vee City of Orono Clerk PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Lin: Minnesota House of Rraresentatives COMMr'ii iuicCT\nQ SEP 2 5 2000 cn Y Ul- OHONO Scpicmber 18,2000 ii.- -'ID SUBJECT: Town Hall Meetings on Metropolitan Council Opclrations an3 Performance The Metropolitan Subcommittee of the Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee will be conducting a series of Town Hall meetings this fall. The meetings are intended to provide an opportunity for citizens and local govemment officials to testify about the need for, effectiveness of, and possible modifications to the Metropolitan Council’s structure and responsibilities. The information gained will be used to build a base for use by the Legislature. The meeting schedule and locations, include: September 27 October 5 October 12 October 18 October 26 November 1 Vadnais Heights Fire Hall, 3595 Arcade Avenue, 7 p.m. Woodbury City Council Chambers, 8301 Valley Creek Road. 7 p.m Anoka County Board Room, 2100 3"* Avenue N., 7:30 p.m. Prior Lake City Council Chambers, 16776 Fish Point Road, 7 p.m. Lakeville City Council Chambers, 20195 Holyoke Avenue, 7 p.m. Plymouth Community Center Ballroom, 14800 34* Avenue, 7 p.m. Each hearing w i” include a brief explanation of the current statutory authority for tl.o Council and of several bills which were introduced during the last session. We will then take testimony from the members of the audience. Due to time constraints, priority will be given to individuals w ho sign up to speak prior to the meeting. Please contact Blair Tremere, Committee Administrator, at 651-296-5376, if you have any questions, or if you would like to testify. I look forward to hearing your comments. If you are unable to attend please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, Representative Mary Liz Holberg, Chair Metropolitan Council and Agencies Subcommittee 12195 Upper 167th Street. Lakeville. Minnesota 55044 (612)435-8723 State Office Building. 100 Constitution Ave., St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1298 FAX (651) 296-7189 TTY (651) 296-9896 email: rep.maryliz.holbergOhouse.leg state.mn.us not printed at government expense (651)296-6926 t L r fL*’ TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator September 22,2000 COiiki/M) »»cc TING SEP 2 5 2000 Cl IY Ur UHUJVU SUBJECT:Status of the Frank Dunbar Senior Housing Proposal Frank Dunbar is moving forward with a senior housing proposal for the Rebers' property in the northwest quadrant of Highway 12 and North Brown Road. Staff has suggested the Planning Commission hold a work session in early October to review the preliminary application, and to identify questions, concerns and issues that can then be addressed in the final application that will go the Planning Commission in November. A copy of the letter to Frank Dunbar regarding the application review process is attached. L September 15,2000 CITYofORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 ' i Frank C. Dunbar, President Dunbar Development Corporation 5000 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55422-5146 Re: Proposed development at Brown Road/US 12 Dear Mr. Dunbar: As we discussed on Monday, your proposal for senior housing and an office building on the Rebers site poses a number of planning challenges for tlie City, in terms of requiring the creation of a new zoning district and performance standards. This is not in and of itself a problem, but the schedule necessary to arrive at final project approvals prior to the end of the year may be difficult. Your proposal will require the following applications: 1.A request for an amendment of the zoning chapter to create a new zoning district to allow the proposed senior housing use. City staff will draft an amendment that creates a new zoning district with performance standards to accomplish this intended use. For the moment for discussion purposes we will name this potential district "MFSR" (Multi-Family Senior Residential). However, we are also contemplating a single new PUD district that allows both office and certain multi-family residential as permitted uses. 2.A request for rczoning of the property. 3.A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the guide plan for this area from strictly commercial to allowing multi-family residential under specified circumstances, as a conditional use and most likely as a PUD/PRD. 4. 5. A request for subdivision (platting) of the site into two separate tax parcels (and to eliminate the current Outlot status of the property). A request for conditional use permit to develop the entire site as a PUD/PRD with MFSR as the underlying district for the residential portion and B-6 Highway Commvrcial District as the underlying district for the office portion. Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us rank Dunbar Septemb r 15, 2000 Page 2 A zoning code amendm nt to er a a new zoning district could pot ntially b schedul:ed for a public h aring by the Planning Comrniss·on at its October 16 me tin i you m k app ication for that amendment b) next Wednesday, Sept mb r 20. The remaining lements of the application proc ss (item 2-5) relate to the actual s·t · and its planning. It is imp rativ tha. , prior to consid raf on by the Planning Commission, your appli ation is .otally comp e e and staff has had suffici nt time o fully revie all. aspects .of the application; it would b� our ·nte t to work with you t r fi th applic t;o1 o t a it :!!·=� he City's developmen requirements. · t docs not appear th " 1t i possib e to c omplis this in time for Planning Comm1ss1on consid ra on . f he application at its October meeting. If we push to get to the October meeting, th r ·n almost certainly b nr sol ed issu s that will r suit in a continuation of the appl cation to the ov mb r Planning ommission meeting. pr ferred It maf v is to s mitt application as soon pos ible but to targ t the November 1--···n Com issio me ting� rconsid ation of th applicat�on. During the ·nterim period, staff wtll ork with you to id nt fy issues and refine the proposal to address the issues. Thi process w ,114 inc' d aw rk s ssion with th Plann · ng Commission ·n early Oc ober o · dentify ·s ues that can be addressed pr· or o final applicatt · n submitt for the Novemb r Planning Commission m eting. In add1t1on, a meeting could be held with the ne · ghbors in Sugar Woods to identif:, d address their concerns This process would substantially increase the probability tha the Planning Commission would be a 1 to forward the application to the City Council for Council consideration in early cember To summarize: 1.Apply for th zoning cod amendm nt no lat r than 2 noon on Wed sday September 20, to be eard y the Planning Commission on Monday Octob r 16. 2.Apply for the r zoning Comp Plan amend ent, subdiv· io an 12 no n on ed esday Octob .r 18, fo cons1d ration by th Monday Novemb r 20 . D/PRD no later · · : · ng Commission on .J. Prior to Octob r 18 and p ferably ar und October I, d L pe tu sch du a ork s ion · i h h -Planning Commis ion and Council to 1de ti . is s aJ d cone ms, to assist you 1n m mor compl te application y the Octob r 18 d . B e on h. s cheduhn 1t wou db� feas·bl o a Council consid rati n f the pr Ii ·nary pla and P t th · ounc ♦.I Dec mber 1 t meeting Frank Dunbar September 15, 2000 Page3 Prerm· ary y Issue As noted at our meeting Monday, ther are a 6 w key issu · which t. e City se s as critical in dev lopm nt of t · it . It wou db v ry helpful to have information r garding these issu s prior to the early October work session: A.Th adequacy of the xisting storm water pond to serve this development. The pond is owned and controlled by MnDOT. We 1,,v II exp ct that yo provide th appropr ate e gineerir g calculations to confinn is adequacy or show ow you wil rect·fy any inad quacies. B.The access issue· complex, involv·ng: circulation w·thin the site and between the o buildings/uses, including parking layout; -whether (or when) it may be necessary to comp ete the service road conn ct�on from your si e t.o the H" ghway 12/Brimhall A venue intersection; -how cc s to and from this sit will function in relation to Brown Road and Highway 12, especially in the interim p riod befo ea semaphore is installed at Brown/12 as part of the Highw y 12 r -routing proJ ct Yo· sh uld plan to ha e a traffic st dy completed as part of submittals tn addr . s thi issue. H ight d m in of e buildings, esp cially the senior ho s· ng, as vie·w d from Highway 12 and Brown oad, &nd as viewed :from the Sugar Woods resid n ial neighborhood. I... trative before and after views will be helpfu to the City in assessing th se impacts. We are loo g. forward to workin w· h you on this project, and wil see to provide whatever assistance c I mov· g the proce s fo d P e f4 1 free to contac me or other staff members if you ve q estions. incere y Mi ha . P. Gaffron nior Pl · C rdin tor cc: Ron oor e . C ty Admm1str tor P .·ul W 1 .lann r/ oni g dm · s t r M yor J b -d o cilmem.be C air Liz ... 10c .. ,,r11 and Planning · mnuss10 Members