Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-14-2000 Council Packet
Public A ttendance Meeting D ate ^ -/W- f' V 69□□□ ComciL Planning C ommission Park commission Other ;p Please fill oot the iNPORMAiiuix g 5: REQUESTED BELOW TOR OUR CITY RECORDS. ■ ••! .*X*• ; V; •; -V • .. v ^ Jf. NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER ■cl 8.. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13._ 14. 15. mimj i.' t | L oronoci VT counc ” MONDAY, JULY 24,2000 ^yg y 4 2000 ROLL tjWi ur UHONU The City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present; Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Charles Kelley, Barbara Peterson, Richard Flint, and Bob Sanscvcrc. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorsc, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Public Services Director Greg Gappa, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7;00 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA 1.APPROVE/AMEND Items 9, 10, and 12 were added to the consent agenda. Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the consent agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *(#2) REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 10,2( Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of July 10,2000. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(#3) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 17,2000 Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the minutes of the Special City Council meeting of July 17, 2000. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - Lili McMillan, Representative None PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sandy Smith, Representative Smith stated she would be present to answer an\- questions the City Council members may have regarding an application. PUBLIC COMMENTS None Page 1 r MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24, 2000 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS White thanked the City Council members for approving the improvements to the Navarre Park. White commented the improvements that the City has been making over the past several years have turned Orono into a more attractive city. Mayor Jabbour commented he has been speaking with Jcrr>- Rockvam, Spring Park Mayor, who has indicated that they have been planting trees along County Road 15 in order to expand their existing green space. Kelley commented with the potential of the land to the west of the Navarre Park being developed, the Parks Commission may want to consider the possibility of relocating the play equipment to that area, which is adjacent to the Dakota Rail and could potentially be accessed b>’ more residents to avoid the need to spend additional money on play equipment in the future. White stated the equipment being purchased for the Navarre Park is an asset and should bo around for a long time. White stated he is unable to comment on what would be ideal for that area until the Parks Commission has an oppK)rtunity to review the plans for that park. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT *(«4) #2597 DENNIS KRUMP, 25 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH - VARIANCE- RESOLUTION NO. 4502 Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4502, a Resolution granting variances to front yard setback and side yard setback to permit construction of an addition to the existing residence located at 25 Stubbs Bay Road North. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(«5) «2598 DOUGLAS J. DAYTON, 300 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - VARIANCE- RESOLUTION NO. 4503 Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4503, a Resolution granting a variance to allow a lakeshore setback of 80’ where 100’ is required to permit an addition to the existing residence located at 300 Sixth Avenue North. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#6) «600 BRIAN KERBER, 740 ORCHARD PARK ROAD - VARIANCES Brian Kerber, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting variances to permic constmetion of a 60” by 40” (2,400 square foot) pole bam on his propertx located at the intersection of Orchard Park Road and County Road 6, consisting of 4 X acres Tliis propert\ is located in the five acre zoning district, with the majority of the lots in this area consisting of acreage betw een 4 .6 and 4.8 acres. Page 2 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24,2000 (#2600 BRIAN KERBER, Continued) Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to construct a pole bam in excess of the City Code, which permits an oversized accessorv’ building to be no bigger than 2,000 square feet for a lot of this size. A second variance is being requested to relocate a two-stall garage in the area where the pole bam is proposed to be constructed. Relocation of the garage would require a variance to the side street setback to allow the stmeture to be located 72.9 feet from the side street lot line where 100 ’ is required. Weinberger stated City Code currently does not permit detached garages and other accessory buildings to be located closer to the front or street lot line than the principal building on a non-lakcshore lot. City Staff had recommended approval of the variance to relocate the garage. The Applicant has indicated he would be willing to relocate the garage further back if the City Council so directs. Weinberger indicated some hardships do exist on this property due to the location of the septic tanks and drainftcid, which restrict the Applicant from construction of the pole bam behind the house. The topography of this site also consists of some low land along with issues relating to high water table and drainage. Location of a building behind the residence would also require extensive regrading and constmetion of a very long driveway to the rear of the property. City Staff feels this is the best location for the pole barn since it will allow use of the existing driveway for access as well as provide access to the existing two-stall garage. City Staff recommended denial of the variance to allow construction of an accessory building in excess of the 2,000 square feet permitted by City Code. The Applicant has indicated he needs the oversized building in order to accommodate a truck and trailer utilized in his occupation, which is 56 ’ long and requires a larger building. Staff has concerns regarding the potential of a precedent being set w ith granting of the variance to permit an oversized accessorv- building. The Planning Commission recommended on a 3 to 2 vote to approv e the variance to permit a 2,160 square foot pole bam on the property and to approve a variance to permit the garage to be relocated closer to the side property line than the principal residence. It was the minority opinion of the Planning Commission that permitting an accessorv structure larger than what is permitted for the lot would set a negative precedent. The Planning Commission indicated that a 60 ’ by 40 ’ building would be too large for the size of the lot and recommended reducing the width of the building to 36 ”, which results in a 2,160 square foot structure. Kcrbcr commented the \ ehicle and trailer he would like to store in this building is 56 long, and he needs a 60 ’ long stmeture in order to allow some room to walk around the vehicle as well as to permit the vehicle and trailer to be backed out. Kcrbcr indicated he is unable to make this building a drw e-through due to the location of the septic sv stem to the rear of the building. Kcrbcr stated he needs to park the vehicle more towards the center of the shed to allow for it to be backed out Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to constmet a 60' by 36 ’ pole bam versus the 60' bv 40'. Page 3 ■ MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24, 2000 («I2600 BRIAN KERBER, Continued) Kerber stated he would be happy with the 60 ’ by 36' structure. Kerber inquired whether he would be allowed under the City Code to construct two 2,000 square foot buildings on his property. Weinberger indicated the Applicant would be permitted to have one oversized acccssor\' building, with the maximum square footage for a lot of this size being 4,000 square feet. Weinberger stated the Applicant technically could construct one accessory building consisting of 2,000 square feet and Uvo buildings consisting of 1,000 square feet under current City Code. Kerber commented if he is unable to consuuct a 2,160 square foot building, he would need to consider the possibility of constructing another 1,000 square foot building on his property. Kerber stated if he is allowed to construct a building consisting of 2,160 square feet, he would not need lO construct another structure on his property. Kelley commented that there apparently is a flaw in the zoning code that needs to be reviewed further by the City Council. Kelley stated in his opinion the opportunity to construct three structures on the property totaling the allowable 4,000 square feet was not the intent of the code. Kelley stated he is not in favor of allowing two additional 1,000 square foot buildings on this property in addition to a 2,000 square foot building. Sanscvcrc inquired whether there was a minimum spacing permitted between the structures. Weinberger stated the property owner would need to keep a minimum often feet between the structures unless a fire wall was constructed. Mayor Jabbour commented in his opinion this is a reasonable request by the Applicant. Kelley commented in his view the City Council is being placed in a position where they have to approve the variance or the Applicant will build another structure. Peterson commented the Applicant would still be able to construct another building under City Code. Kerber commented he docs not want to have to construct another building on his property and would be happy with the 2,160 square foot structure. Peterson inquired what the hardship is to allow the variance to the oversized accessory' building. Mayor Jabbour stated in his view the Applicant would need to waive his right to construct one of his 1,000 square foot buildings if the variance is granted. Jabbour inquired w hether the Applicant would be willing to give up his right to construct one of his 1,000 square foot buildings that he is permitted under City Code if the variance is granted. Kerber reiterated he docs not want to construct another building on his property and would prefer to construct the 2,160 square foot building. Tom Barrett, City Attorney, stated in his opinion the City could request the Applicant give up his Page 4 r MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24,2000 rh 1 ,;i (^2600 BRIAN KERBER, Continued) right to construct one of the 1,000 square foot buildings as a condition of the variance being granted. Mayor Jabbour stated the Applicant would still be allowed to construct a 1,000 square foot building on his property but he would be giving up his right to construct two 1,000 square foot buildings if he elects to construct the 2,160 square foot pole barn. Sansevere inquired whether a future property owner would be held to the same restriction. Mayor Jabbour stated that would be part of the agreement. Kelley reiterated City Staff should review this part of the code. Sansevere commented the wetland area of the property should also be taken into consideration when considering this type of application. Kelley stated he is in agreement that the amount of wetland on the property should be considered and that perhaps the code should apply only to dr\' buildabic land rather than the total acreage. Mayor Jabbour stated he also is in agreement that the code should apply to dry buildabic land only. Flint inquired whether the Applicant will be relocating the garage further back. Kcrbcr stated he will attempt to push the garage back as far as possible, but noted that he is unable to relocate it much further back due to the steep grade that e.xists at the rear of his property. Kcrbcr stated he could possibly locate it six to eight feet further back. Kelley stated in his view the hardship is the storage of this vehicle and trailer. Kelley inquired what assurance the City Council would have that this vehicle and trailer will be parked inside the building. Kcrbcr indicated he has gone through six trailers in the past ten years by having them sit outside and having them rust due to the elements and would prefer to store his vehicle and trailer indoors. Kelley reiterated that he would like the Applicant to store this vehicle and trailer inside rather than utilize the pole bam for storage of other items. Kcrbcr stated he w ould be w illing to put this into w riting if so requested. Sansevere commented the fact that the Applicant needs storage for his vehicle and trailer is not a hardship in his view. Kelley stated the City Council is required by law to grant variances based on a hardship. Sansevere commented in his view that may not constitute a hardship. Page 5 V . - MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24, 2000 (1^2600 BRIAN KERBER, Continued) Peterson stated a hardship in her view is inherent to the land and not the need for additional storage space. Mayor Jabbour commented he would like to sec the properties in Orono be as uncluttered as possible. Sansevere moved, Jnbbour seconded, to approve the variance to permit construction of a 2,160 square foot pole barn and a variance to the street lot line for the property located at 740 Orchard Park Road, with the stipulation being that if the Applicant wishes to exercise his right as presently exists in the Ordinance to construct an additional shed, that building must comply to City standards, and with the understanding the Applicant will store his vehicle and trailer inside the newly constructed structure, and further with the understanding that the existing two-stall garage will be relocated as far back as possible. Jabbour commented in his view the hardship is based on the land and the Applicant relinquishing his right to construct four structures on his property. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Peterson Opposed. Peterson stated in her view there is no hardship inherent with the land and that the Applicant should be required to limit the size of the building to 2,000 square feet. (#7) JAMES ANDERST - NARROWS SALOON, 3380 SHORELINE DRIVE - PERMIT REVIEW James Anderst, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the City of Orono has issued a building permit to the Applicant to allow the additional remodeling of the Narrows Saloon which includes c.xpanding the bar into the former Minnetonka Photo space, which is now vacant. This property is located in the B-l Retail Sales Business District in which a Class II Restaurant Is defined as a restaurant which scr\cs into.xicating liquor or has live entertainment. Weinbcrgei stated the e.vpansion of the building requires the owner to obtain a conditional use permit since Class II Restaurants arc allowed by a conditional use permit. The applicant has made a formal application for a conditional use permit, but would technically be considered to be an after-the-fact application since the owner was permitted to proceed forward with the remodeling and e.xpansion of the restrooms. Weinberger stated the proposed expansion meets all setback requirements for the B-l District, with no change to the footprint of the building except for the small expansion to the restroom area. Weinberger stated the expansion to the restroom is needed in order to make the restrooms handicap accessible. Subsequent to issuance of a building permit, Stafi* determined that a conditional use permit is Page 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24, 2000 (JAMES ANDERST, Continued) needed for the expansion project. The Planning Commission .vill review this conditional use permit application at their next meeting. The Applicant has requested that he be allowed to proceed with the remodeling and expansion. City Staff would request a letter in writing from the Applicant indicating that all wo’"k is done at the ewner’s risk at this point since a conditional use permit is required. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting the City Council approve the continued remodeling of the Narrows Saloon prior to the August 21” conditional use permit rev iew and prior to the issuance of the conditional use permit. Anderst stated he obtained a demolition permit from the City to tear a concrete wall out and erect a beam. Anderst stated he submitted architectural drawings to the City and obtained a building permit. Anderst stated he proceeded with the remodeling and requested a footings inspection and was told at that time that he needed to appear before the Citv’ Council. Anderst stated he was informed by the building inspector that he did not notiec the new footings at the time he reviewed the plans. Mayor Jabbour stated it was his recollection that at the time the Applicant approached the City for a liquor license, he had indicated he wanted to remodel the structure. Jabbour stated the issue relating to live music will be part of the conditional use permit, but the restaurant and bar license has been approved. Weinberger stated the Applicant is expanding into the vacant Minnetonka Photo space, and technically a conditional use permit is required. Weinberger stated anv’ building permits to expand the size of this building, requires City Council approval as part of a commercial site plan review, which is part of the conditional use permit process. Mayor Jabbour inquired why the owner is proceeding at his own risk since the City has previously granted a liquor license based on the existing plan and also a building permit. Weinberger stated the issue relates to the live entertainment. Kelley stated in his view the City has errored by not realizing the Applicant would be expanding the use of his business, which requires a conditional use permit, w ithout having a commercial site plan done first. Kelley stated City Staff should have realized at the time of the request for a demolition permit that the business was being expanded and that a site plan review was required as well as a conditional use permit to do that. Mayor Jabbour pointed out the Applicant is attempting to work with the City on this matter and that hopefully a mutual agreement can be reached. Kelley indicated as part of a commercial site plan other factors come into play, such as lighting, signage, and parking, which the Applicant should be aware of Kelley stated he has concerns that the City Council gives the okay to proceed forward with the remodeling without these other issues being addressed. Kelley commented in his view it is not proper for the City Council to proceed forward with this application without a site plan review and conditional use permit review. Page 7 r MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24, 2000 (JAMES ANDERST, Continued) Anderst stated the building is not changing except for the four foot expansion to the restroom area. Anderst commented he is merely expanding into existing space. Mayor Jabbour stated in his view the Applicant is entitled to proceed forward with his remodeling project. Anderst stated the improvements have enhanced the neighborhood. Mayor Jabbour stated the Applicant will be required to meet certain conditions at the time the site plan and conditional use permit process are reviewed. Weinberger stated the City Council will need to approve the Applicant proceeding fonvard with the remodeling project, noting the building currently is open and constmetion is undci^vay. Flint commented since the Applicant is in the midst of the remodeling at the present time, it is difficult for the City Council to tell the Applicant not to proceed forward since City Staff failed to inform the Applicant of the proper procedure that needs to be followed. Flint reiterated the applicant will be required to meet certain conditions that arc normally required as part of the conditional use permit. Flint moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the continued remodeling of the Narrows Saloon located at 3380 Shoreline Drive prior to the August 21, 2000 Conditional Use Permit review and prior to the Conditional Use Permit being issued by the City of Orono, with the understanding the Applicant will be required to meet certain required conditions as part of the Conditional Use Permit process. Anderst inquired what typically is required with a conditional use permit. Mayor Jabbour stated the requirements vaiy from property to properly and arc undetermined at tliis time. Ma>or Jabbour stated there still is an issue with the live entertainment that will need to be further addressed. Kelley stated the kitchen may need to be brought up to code and other items such as lighting, signage, parking, and hours of operation will need to be reviewed. Kelley expressed concern that he is being requested to approve this application without those questions being answered. Flint commented that the City Council is not approving the conditional use permit at this time but is merely allowing the Applicant to proceed forward with the remodeling. Mayor Jabbour stated the City Council in his \ icw will not be able to dcn\ the Applicant the right to continue to operate as he was in the past, but that any expansion of use w ill need to be reviewed. Jabbour stated the issuance of a building permit has triggered a number of requirements which will need to be addressed. Kelley stated the amount of parking required for this business differs from the photo business that used to exist at this location. Page 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24, 2000 (JAMES ANDERST, Continued) Andcrst commented he experiences a number of people parking in the public parking lot that frequent Lord Fletchers. Sansevcrc inquired what increase in capacity the Applicant is expecting with this additional space. Andcrst stated he is not sure at this time. Anderst slated the total square footage of the building is 3,000 square feet. Sansevcrc inquired what the current capacity of the building is. Andcrst stated Code allows 15 square feet per person at the present time. Andcrst stated he is not aware of what that number is ofiliand. Kelley stated he is not trying to be opposed to this project, but that the City needs to be careful about informing the Applicant that he will be required to meet certain conditions as part of this project. Kelley inquired whether the City Council w ould be in favor of closing this business dow n should the Applicant not be able to meet the required conditions. Mayor Jabbour stated in his view the City Council should not take that position since the City did issue a building permit to the Applicant and did not inform the Applicant that he needed to obtain a conditional use permit. Flint commented in his opinion it has been made clear to the Applicant that he will be required to comply with certain conditions as part of this project. Anderst requested he be allowed to keep the live entertainment. Mayor Jabbour commented that will need to be discussed further Jabbour noted he has received calls in support of the improvements from the residents in the area. VOTE ON ABOVE MOTION: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Jabbour noted he will be meeting w ith the County Commissioners regarding the Dakota Rail to Trail project this week. Mayor Jabbour stated the issues relating to Narrows Dock have not been resolved. Jabbour indicated he has discussed this matter w ith a few of the residents of this area who have expressed dissatisfaction with the parking. Jabbour stated a consensus was reached with the neighbors that this was primarily a personal matter and that the City should probably not be involved. Jabbour stated he suggested a meeting be held with all the ow ners of the docks to tr>’ to obtain first rights of refusal for the purchase of the dock lots by the ow ners of adjacent properties. Mayor Jabbour stated the issue relating to the additional water patrol was not meeting w ith much Page 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24, 2000 (MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT, Continued) success, noting there is a lack of funding. Kelley commented there is a problem with people rafting within 30 feet of the shoreline, with a couple of the residents in this area requesting additional patrol. Mayor Jabbour stated the LMCD did approve the additional water patrol concept but that there is an issue relating to the funding and that the LMCD has elected not to make this a top priority at this time. Kelley expressed concern that this matter is not being pursued more actively in light of the fact that all the cities have indicated that additional water patrol is needed. Mayor Jabbour commented this is an issue that needs to be discussed at the time the City's budget is being prepared. Sanscverc stated that perhaps the City should consider installing no trailer parking signs on Northshore Drive cast of the Nocrenburg Channel to limit parking. Sanseverc commented there is also a problem with vehicles waiting to get their boats out of the water as well as the number of vehicles with trailers being parked in this area. Mayor Jabbour commented that there is also a lack of courtesy being sho\\ n on the part of the drivers and that access to this dock mav need to be limited. It was the consensus of the City Council to erect no trailer parking signs in the area of Noerenburg Park. Jabbour moved, Snnsevere seconded, to direct City Staff to request Hennepin C’onnty to erect no car trailer parking signs along County Road 51 in the area of Noerenburg Park, and that parking will be prohibited along County Road 51 all the way to Highway 84. VOTE: Aye«5, NaysO. Mayor Jabbour indicated this action is being taken out of concerns for public safety. Sanscverc inquired whether the police department will be notified of this action. Moorsc stated the police department will be notified first of the change in parking for this area. Mayor Jabbour indicated he has S|K>kcn with the Community Education coordinator as part of the Chamber luncheon that he recently attended. Jabbour indicated he informed the coordinator of the discussion held at the City Council workshop regarding the activities held within the City and the local parks. Jabbour stated as the population in this area and Independence increases, there w ill be an increase in the use of the local parks, w hich needs to be considered. Kelley eommented once the new Highway 12 is completed, there w ill be an increase in population and that steps will need to be taken on how to accommodate that added growth. Flint commented that the City of Independence was looking at changing its ordinance regarding the amount of livestock and horses allowed per acre. Page 10 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24,2000 PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT (US) PURCHASE OF NEW FURNACE FOR CRYSTAL BAY POST OFFICE Kelley inquired whether the City has a profit and loss statement on this building and whether the amount of money the City puts into the building exeeeds the amount of rent revenue reeeived. Moorse indieated the City receives $5,400 a year in rent. Mayor Jabbour commented it was his understanding it was approximately S11,000 a year or $800.00 a month. Moorse stated the City did some significant wosk -U'proximatcly eight years ago, which amounted to a year's worth of rent, and has not performed an\ improvements since that time. Gappa stated this project has been prompted as a result of a concern regarding the fuel tanks located on this property. Gappa stated the fuel tanks arc to be removed following installation of the gas furnace. Kelley commented he is not opposed to the project, but that he would like to be assured that ta.xpaycr money is not being used to improve this project. Moorse stated the City is not losing money on the rental of this building. Kelley inquired whether the soil will be tested following removal of the tanks. Gappa stated the tanks arc located above ground and that he was not planning on having the soil in this area tested since there is no evidence that the tanks have ever leaked. Kelley recommended th? soil in this area be tested. Mayor Jabbour stated if there is obvious signs of contamination, the City docs have an obligation to take appropriate steps to correct the problem Peterson moved, Flint seconded, to approve the quotation for installation of a new furnace and air conditioner for the Crystal Bay Post Office building from Vogt Heating And Air Conditioning, St. Louis Park, Minnesota, in the amount of $3,975.00 to be funded from the 2000 Capital Outlay Budget. Flint inquired whether the amount included the costs for hookup. Gappa stated it was his understanding the utility pa> s for the cost of bringing the gas to the building and meter, with the City paying the other costs associated w ith hookup, which is included in the bid. Page 11 r f i . MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24,2000 *(«9) PURCHASE OF SEWER VACUUM TRUCK Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the purchase of a Vactor Series sewer vacuum truck through the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Program from MacQueen Equipment, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, for a total cost of S247,238.00, to be funded from the Sewer Fund; and to approve a budget adjustment to reflect the expenditure. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. •(#10) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #2-2000 LIFT STATION PROJECT Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Request for Payment #2, 2000 Lift Stations Project to Ford Construction Co., Inc., in the amount of S38,0I8.05. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#11) AWARD QUOTATION FOR DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS AT 3790 SHORELINE DRIVE Flint stated it was his understanding the City would be splitting the costs of this project with the Parks Commission, which is not reflected in the memorandum. Flint stated this land w:is to be treated 50/50 with the Parks Commission Mayor Jabbour stated the section of land that the City owns is next to County Road 15, which docs not have anuhing on it. Flint commenteti that section of land is valued higher than the other section Mayor Jabbour stated it is better to deplete the Park Fund and for the City to make a contribution to the Park Fund. *(#12) REPLACEMENT OF FACSIMILE MACHINE - BUDGET ADJUSTMENT Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the purchase of a Xerox Document WorkCentre Pro 657 facsimile machine through the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Program from Precision Business Systems, Inc., for a total cost of S2,007.53, to be funded from the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund; and to approve a budget adjustment to reflect the expenditure. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 12 iii. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 24,2000 (1113) SCHEDULING OF BUDGET WORK SESSION City Staff was directed to schedule a workshop for Tliursday, August 3, at 9:30 a.m., to discuss updates to the coniprehensive plan. City Staff was directed to schedule a budget workshop for Monday, August 7, at 4:00 p.m CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT None («14) LICENSES None *{HIS) BILLS Peterson moved, Snnsevere seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. ATTEST: Linii S. Vcc, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Ma\or Page 13 II, .5- f : '^'^' '^'Cll. MEETING AUG 1 4 2000REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cl I r ur UHO/vo DATE: August 9,2000 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Presentation by Metropolitan Council Member Mary Hill Smith Mary Hill Smith has requested an opportunity to present to the City Council a Certificate of Appreciation from the Metropolitan Council. The Certificate of Appreciation is being presented to cities who have participated in the Livable Communities Program since its inception. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: No action required. P ' A MEETING AUG I 4 2000 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 9,2000 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Presentation by Maple Plain Volunteer Fire Department Dave Eisinger, Chief of the Maple Plain Volunteer Fire Department, has requested an opportunity to make a presentation to the Orono City Council. The presentation will include an update regarding Maple Plain Fire Department activities, and a proposal regarding the purchase of a new firefighting apparatus. The proposed new piece of firefighting equipment is an aerial truck, which is a ladder truck that can be used to access the roofs of taller buildings. Because the Department has fimding built into its budget for equipment purchases, and because Orono’s share of the total budget is relatively small, the City ’s share of the cost of the aerial truck will be small. Chief Eisinger will present the cost information at the meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: No action required. J -, :..... �.� � ' z,�o ii s-.aes� _n .. 3200 �M•-•---• ..... t-2{;,D 7 � :1 �i • j,, •... , .. ... ;; ....... j._�. Jtr[. ,,�., '::I ., I ••• .... &� 1,&1 �.u.t -a,-.... ... .. cs, .,.. ·� - ' ·,."' �" 1, '5\ti-1<f.:. ' .. .. ~ - �. c:.--= ·•-i·!_.�HJ ;�-�� • • .C--·---. t·.:··· ._..___� ,.. �--- :..t..-.£ --�.,,_ I Joo ... J ,K..�� WAY. _. .. T� • / ✓•� r AG.ENDA FOR COU1'CIL MEETING SET FOR MO1'1>A Y, ORONO COUNCIL CHA.l\IBERS, 2780 KELLEV PARKW) (•) Asterisk items are considered to be routine it.ems to be enacted uporunder the Consent Item• on the agenda. t vfemos regarding each of th1 Public Packet -located on the counter near the sign in sheet. ROLL CAL CONSENT AGE1'"DA l.Approve/ AmendAPPROVAL OF i\tINUTES •2. Regular Council Meeting of July 24, 2000l\ilARY HILL S:\UTH, l\'lETROPO LIT Al" COUNCIL -CERTIFi\lAPLE PLAIN FIRE DEPARTJVIENT • PRESENTA TIO N PARK COMMISSION CO�f:\'lENTS -Irene Silber, Rep.�sentath•c PLANNING C0:\1MISSIO� CO�l!\1E!'i"TS -Dan Kluth, Repres:n BLIC COi\ll\lE='ITS -(Limit 5 l\'linutes Per Person) ZONING ADi\'lThlSTRA TOR'S REPORT 3. #2568 Bancor Group, Inc., Southwest Corner of \1/iUow Df r Willow View -Review of Entrance Momunent Plan 4.#2599 Bob and Wendy Beutler, 684 Tonkawa Road -Variant •5. #2600 Brian Kerber, 740 Orchard Park Road -Variances -Re 6.#2602 Thomas and Jennifer Graham, l 065 Tamarack Drive -I •7. #2607 John and Maureen Vogt and i\ticbael and Ann Hilbclinl Subdivision -Resolution 1\-lA YOR/CO�CIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 8.Request for Payment #3 -Highway 12 Lift Station 9.Request for Payment #1 -\Vebber Hills Sanitary Sewer Proji I 0. Request for Payment #3 -Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-Sac 11.Highway 12 Lift Station Electric Service 12.Update on Mooney Lake Outlet Project 13.Crystal Bay Park Des-ignation 14.Crystal Bay Post Office Window Replacement CITY ADl\-W,,.'lSTR.\TOR'S REPORT 15.Appointment of 2000 Primary Election Judges -Rcsolutio1 16.Orono Area Sports Alliance Agreement -Resolution 17.Authorize Bond Sale -Resolution 18.Stubbs Bay/Maxwell Bay Water Quality -Resolution 19.2001 Proposed Long Lake Fire Budget 20.Appoint Administrative Support Assistant/Deputy City Cle 21.Appoint Part-Time Community Service Officer 22.Scheduling of Budget Work Session CITY A TTORJ\'"EY'S REPORT • 23. LICENSES •24.BILLS -- R� r... . I " .. , •I"' ,. I '- 1'l I I I 2800 �,� ·"�"' __,, ..;,:,,�/ I •-• 11 • f REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 'MCM. meeting AUG 1 4 2000 Ui I r yjtiUNO DATE: August 10,2000 ITEM NO.3 Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2568 The Bancor Group Inc. (Willow View Developers, LLC) Southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North (Willow View) Review of Entrance Monument Plan Exhibits: A B C D E F Overhead View of North Entrance to Willow View Drive. Side Elevation of Willow View Entrance Monument Park Sketch Sketches and Plans for Mailbox Structures Approved Street Plan for Willow View Bikeways Manual 6-5.0 Summary of Request: The resolution approving the Willow View development required a review of the monument plan by the City Council. The plans have been submitted for a review of the entrance monument at the north entrance of Willow Drive. The developers have also submitted additional plans for benches along the bike/walking trails as well as mailbox supports. The north entrance is a split entrance with an island between the lanes of traffic. Proposed is a monument entrance with lettering identifying the “Willow View” neighborhood. The structure would arch over the bike/walking trail and have a total length of 20'. Material would be metal posts to give it a “gate ” style appearance. Only Willow View would be lettered. MnDot has established recommended clearance heights and widths for underpasses along bike trails. The proposed drawing, Exhibit B, indicates a clearance height of only 6’ for the arch and an 8' width. According to the MnDot Bikeways Manual it would be recommended the arch have a clearance height of approximately 1 O' and a 12' width. (Bikeways Manual 6-5.0 is attached as Exhibit F). The trail will have an 8' width allowing a 2' clearance on each side for an arch constructed to the standards established in the Manual. Staff has discussed the use of lights with the developer and landscape architect. It may be more appropriate to have ground level lighting to illuminate the monument to identify the entrance and to make the island visible during the evening. The proposed location of the entrance light may impact the adjacent residential structures in Willow View and Shadowood. Request for Council Action continued Page 2 -- --- ' .. . . CT . ' � -�. I . i < ... .I • , , I , , ...... --__ ,... • ----- • ( .,,...r'-' . I �r-_1 \ ��:--h� .. -1 I • I •·I .·I / I . , • '1 ., •' ' -I• l .:c. . \ \_ -_) \ \ -.... _. �- .,,,.... . /� I I -- . -. . . ' I -... --- . • . .. �--·----..--·-· . .. • • / ! , • I I ... -•---... ·-. I -. . � ' : --· •' . . -. -----. . . -l j I ..__ , I '-•" • _..-_;;;; � --· ... -........ ... .-.. I' I .-"! ·..,.,f·- 1 ' , .. -:..-4• I • I • ,,_ -I , ,• ;l >.�-� /'.:/ . .;� i ,,,, •, � ·-·-- r \ \ ·' •I-l \,j)' I ___ v ,. I \ V'\ I • , • ----·- --·-· . _·:..-==- I • .. _ . \\ I ...... I I ' ; ' l .. I l• f.\ : ��· I • i • . •I . . : I � ' i ' I • I ' !� , . I I . . . , ) I I )./•I I I • ' I •• ,. ) .. , I ) ' - ( .•. --·. \] • I , I < /1 I f I \ I I I I ' I I' ---) .......... ���--�---�------:._,,4�-.;;;:;;;;;;;���-U-��:::i:t. _ .... �· � l I ��� � I i ! ) IL' - • • � . � ,I . . . . . . .. • ,..,• I I t �f.. r-: •, ll � J I • . \ .. --. i ' .,.··�· �,:t:r / J ,./ I I . i- };f-�-f_� ./ I I ~ .. • , .-I ... ' • I I, � ) f 1 I t , • I , I I '. I \ .. ' .,. ' . r � I . I oun.ofC --. .... "' =-.. ; .... ·- .. •. •. . '· \ ,,, WILLOW VIEW . l • • WILLOW VIEW GRADING, UTILITY & STREET CONSTRUCTION PLANS WlllOW "1£W 0£"1:lOP RS. l.LC. OAVE N(MIAN 1 S21 94 TH lANE 8LAJNE. MN 55•U9 (612)792-8974 IHOC• SHEET . DESCRIPTION 1 ............... covffi SHE£ f 2. ............. COWPOSUE U TY PLAN J •............. SAH. SUeE:A/WATERMAIN - • OW ORI\€ ................ SAN. SCYICR/WATERMM .. -•L OW \1£W ORl\f: 5 .............. SAN S£�R/WATCRMAIN -WIU.OW 'il£W ORIYE 6 ........ ou••·WA AMAIN -TO ORONO SCHOOt. (WEST) 7 .............. STRECT Pl.AN -Ylll.LOW "1EW ORI-.{a .............. ,smcc T PLAN -Ml.OW "1[W ORI\£ 9 .............. 'STRECT Pl.AH -PRIVATE DRIVE 10 ............. CRM)NC DRAINACC & EROSION CONTROL PL.AN 11 ............. 0EfAll.S17 ............. 0ETAA.S VICINITY MAP �CT lOCAnoH 6(2)BIKEWAYS MANUAL JUNE 17,1996 c c c c c c c c c c c c t: k c c c c c e c I 6-S.O Bicycle and Pedestrian Underpasses and Tunnels A bikeway underpass may be a desirable way to carry a bikeway across a highway. It has the advantages that costs are generally lower than an overpass and there may be less grade change for a bicyclist to negotiate than an overpass. A disad* vantage is that unless it is well located and openly designed, it may be conducive to crime and be avoided by bicyclists and pedestrians. Providing adequate drainage may also be a problem. 4,5 m is desirable. When the underpass is long (e.g. when go- ing under a four>l^e road), wider openings are recommended to improve lighting and visibility . Six meters is a desirable width. Vertical clearance should at least 3 m. Underpasses are usually constructed of cast>in*place or pre cast concrete or steel in circular, arch, or rectangular shapes with proper horizontal and vertical clearances. Arch shapes offer good clearance and lighting. The possibility of attacks upon users accompanies any type of design. Be selective as to location to facilitate safety. Approaches and grades should provide the ma.ximum possible field and range of vision of the way ahead to the bicyclist and pedestrian. Provide adequate amounts of light under struc tures, in mnnels and at approaches. In certain cases, lighting may be required on a daily. 24- hour basis. See the lighting section in Chapter 5. Illuminating tunnels of a length of 10 m at all times is desirable. The horizontal and vertical alignments should be straight for the full length and for an adequate distance on each ap proach. The minimum width of an underpass for bicyclists and pedestrians should be the paved width of the approach path plus one meter. Recommended minimum width is 3.6 m; Figure 6-4.0A Source; IA a Octt Application Date: 6/21/00 Completion Date: 6/21/00 Deadline:8/20/00 'Mrii. meeting AUG 1 4 2000 On » v-ir UttO/VO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 1,2000 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2599 Bob and Wendy Beutler 684 Tonkawa Road Variances Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area: 29,564 s.f. (.68 acre) List of Exhibits: A B C D Site Plan/Survey Draft Resolution Planning Commission Minutes (July 17,2000) Planning Report (July 10, 2000) Application Review: The applicants have a proporal to remove an existing house and construct a new house on property located at 684 Tonkawa Road. The lot is located in the LR-IB zoning district requiring a minimum lot size of one acre and a lot width at the lakeshore and structure setback of 140'. They are requesting variances to permit new construction on an undersized lot (.68 acre) having a lot width of 85'. A second variance is requested to permit a 12' encroachment into the average lakeshore setback for a portion of the new residence. The residence would be approximately 100' from the 929.4' OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend approval of the application to grant a variance to lot area and lot width and granting of a veiriance to the average lakeshore setback setback to permit a 12' encroachment into the average lakeshore setback to allow construction of a new residence on the property, with the understanding that there will be no hardcover allowed over the 25 percent limit, and subject to approval of the grading plan. i i- n' f . -,v • l.l 4 . S'-. 5d^4 >, i «. Irt Request for Council Action continued Page 2 August \s 2000 #2599 Bob and Wendv Beutler _____ Staff Recommendation: Staff makes the following recommendations: To approve the variance application for lot area and lot width based on the fact the lot is developed as a single family dwelling, has been provided sanitary sewer service and it would not be possible to acquire additional land to create a conforming lot. To approve the average lakeshore setback variance to permit a 12' encroachment into the average lakeshore setback based on the following findings: •Construction of the house in the proposed location places the house 100’ from the lakeshore. •The proposed location of the house best utilizes the topography of the lot. Using the flat area of the property would permit a house to constructed without requiring additional grading beyond what would normally be permitted with new home construction. •Impacts to the lakeshore views for the property to the north would be minimal. The existing house is located 20' closer to the lakeshore than the proposed new house. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend the attached resolution. • ....... . .,, -- w 0 ,. i -• '°' .. I , ---.------o. --_ _.,,..----,0 • \ ' .... - CD u, ,-... N,,., � .., (0 VJ .. _ . ' -.. -- - . -.. . . ,. - . • --·.- \3S ROfl-O - -..--- I• I .,, �. , . I I - - ., I I I I I ---- A \ ' .. . , ., S'.' I'.' *' ■I ^ 4 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C) (6) FILE NO. 2599 WHEREAS, Robert Beutler and Wendy Beiitler, husband and wife, (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 684 Tonkawa Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: The Southeasterly Half of Lot 5, and the Northwesterly Half of Lot 6, Except the Northwesterly 15.00 feet of the Southeasterly Half of Lot 5 Parten’s Point First Division, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 17,2000, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportimity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit new residential construction on a 0.68 acre lot where 1.0 acre is required and having a lot width of 85 feet where 140 feet is required, and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6) to permit a 12 foot encroachment of the average lakeshore setback where no encroachment is normally allowed. Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1.This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2599. Page 1 of 6 2. 3. This property is located in the LR-IB Zoning District, where 1 acre is the minimum lot area. The property consists of approximately 0.68 acre. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 17, 2000 and recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0. 4.The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A.The property has been developed with a residential use since at least 1960. B.The site plan indicates the proposed setbacks 10' to the side property lines and the house would be outside of the 75' lakeshore setback. The existing deck is within the 75' lakeshore setback. The entire house would be located approximately 100' from the lakeshore, which meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for new structures. C.The 12' encroachment into the average lakeshore setback has been established by the adjacent structures. The site line issue is primarily with the adjacent property to the north. A small portion of the proposed house is within the setback. However, the proposed house would be located 20' further back on the lot than the existing structure. D.A detached garage has been located near Tonkawa Road for many years. The building is located 8.5' from the front property line, where 10' is required. The applicants have stated they would not remove the building. E.The proposed plan does not show any proposed decks or patios on the lakeside of the house. The hardcover that is proposed within the 75-250' setback does not allow for any additional hardcover in the future as it is proposed at 24.99% where a maximum 25% is permitted. It would not be in keeping with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Code to permit additional hardcover on the lot in the 75-250' setback. The only way to accommodate decks or patios within the hardcover limits will be to reduce hardcover elsewhere. Page 2 of 6 F.The lot has a driveway that connects with the lot to the north. Both lots also have individual access to Tonkawa Road. The shared portion of the driveway would be removed from the subject lot to reduce hardcover and close the shared portion of the driveway. 5.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, leports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit new residential construction on a 0.68 acre lot where 1.0 acre is required and having a lot width of 85 feet where 140 feet is required, and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6) to permit a 12 foot encroachment of the average lakeshore setback where no encroachment is normally allowed. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, completed by Mark Gronberg, Coffin & Gronberg, Inc., dated July 14,2000. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. It is the intent of the City Council that variances to develop the lot to exceed allowed hardcover would not be looked upon favorably. Page 3 of 6 ►•»' Lf. 1'^" 3. 4. 5. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 14,2001). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of August, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) i (' t ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of August, 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of,2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Notary Public On this day of 2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 !<>V T \ ^ V... .-»i»**^ >f«/« #f / • N 6ri2' 30" E /\ /• n« ~~•.,------r tifH \ / s I•1.M* oasmcs s •• CAMACe • Jt-LlJ« ........,.jg.T..’r..v ? / <. • #■• \- I fti #Mf******^** -i_^ •"v'^i V '^Jb- i^r ■ / mi/V ■ n-. »•* \ . 1 • . ' ‘i : i •I * « Xmmmmmm^^rn 1 ‘ / / '■ ^7 ,.Hsr Uii; m ■■ - • • . • • • J» • • • ^ ^ * j rjoiJ •I t ' \ ! M M i yyjig . 1 ; • : ; I :«?»<„; . • " 1 • : : I • CM im.CM (ill . .II !■IfP i^t./ S 61*12* 30 “ W ;*3?7.58 ‘**#i: :1 i-L_ .' • * .'f .'1 • ' ' 1 ‘ f *•\ : t •• ; /."•»:V S' ^Vii. ; • .......................>V"--- - -- ■• MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 17, 2000 C |A stated it was the goal of both cities to improve relations between the two Planning Comminions regardless of what happens with the merger and to discuss issues of concern and common intcrei^elating to various items, such as the new Highway 12 corridor. Lindquist inquired ifanv plans had been decided upon regarding the old Long Lake Ford building. GafTron stated to his knowledge a dbqjsion has not been reached regarding that building. Kluth stated Long Lake was also going to\^lude the Orono Planning Commission members on their mailing list for their city newsletter. Smith commented she would like to see it included in tRbir packets if possible. Lindquist commented he would like to see more green space iI^^av arrc, if possible. Lindquist inquired whether the old church located in Navarre is going to be tonNlown. Weinberger indicated the developer has been issued a demolition permit to< Smith commented the Long Lake Snyder Drug is e.\panding, with the possible addlS^n of a drive-up window. SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS («4) #2599 BOB AND WENDY BEUTLER, 64S TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCES, 6:56 p.m.-7:l7p.m. Bob Bcutler, Applicant, was present. The Certificate of Ma* v.'rg .;nd Affidavit of Publication were noted. Weinberger stated th:. VK--cants are proposing to remove an existing house and construct a new- house on the property located at 684 Tonkawa Road, which is located in the LR-IB Zoning District requiring a minimum lot size of one acre and a lot width at the lakeshorc and structure setback of 140*. This lot consists of .68 acre. PAGE 6 MiMt rtitfivtMifrtiiv* rtsr«i riHW r«K¥rtrt<MiE*j [•XflOltM •ICtlilt] rtitioj riKWtinrt [•■fUtltlv] r#iRTiM«B rtrtriTt] MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 17,2000 construct a small drainage area at one comer of the house to collect all the water runoff from the driveway and the area that currently drains towards the neighbor's residence. City Staff would recommend approval of the application as presented, witli approval of the average lakeshore setback variance to permit a 12’ encroachment into the average lakcshore setback based on the following findings: 1.Construction of the house in the proposed location places the house 100’ from the lakcshore. 2.The proposed location of the house best utilizes die topography of the lot. Using the flat area area of the property would permit a house to be constructed without requiring additional grading beyond what would normally be permitted with new home construction. 3.Impacts to the lakcshore views for the property to the north would be minimal. The existing house is located 20’ closer to the lakeshore than the proposed new house. Weinberger stated the proposal is consistent with the existing development in the area, with no issues relating to septic. Weinberger noted it is not possible to acquire any add ;)onal land to make this lot bigger since both lots arc currently developed. Weinberger stated the proposed location of the new residence best utilizes the topography of the lot and takes advantage of the natural drainage channels existing on the property, with minimal grading required. Weinberger stated one concern is the lack of decks or patios depicted on the plan. The Applicant has indicated they would like to make use of existing enclosed areas rather than construct a deck or patio. The Applicant has indicated he understands the concerns of Staff that the proposed plan does use up most of the allowable hardcover and structural coverage in tliis area. Staff would not recommend any variances to allow the construction of decks or patios in the future unless the Applicant demonstrates w ithin his final plan that there is additional hardcover available to allow a deck or patio. Smith inquired whether there is an issue relating to easement and access as it relates to the shared PAGES ¥ VI: * . ^ * MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 17, 2000 driveway. Smith noted nothing currently exists in the record regarding that shared driveway. Beutler indicated that was an agreement reached between the two parties. Weinberger stated there has not been anything recorded on either property. Weinberger stated the adjacent resident has been notified of this meeting. Smith inquired whether the Applicant has spoken with his new neighbor regarding his proposal. Beutler stated he has spoken with his neighbor who indicated he does not have any major coneems regarding the proposal. Beutler indicated they have been working c.losely with City Staff to arrive at a plan that would be acceptable. Beutler stated in his opinion this plan is a win/win situation, with the four-season porch allowing them to enjoy the climate year-round without the need for a deck or patio. Smith inquired whether there were any concerns that City Staff may have relating to the recently submitted grading and drainage plan. Weinberger stated City Staff at this time docs not have any major concerns regarding the grading and drainage plan. Weinberger stated Staff docs have a concern with the long driveway u.id the lack of a tum.'’round being proviacd. The Applicant has indicated there is a waj to include a tumarcsMWr u\ ?. proposal. Lindquist inquired whether that would negatively impact the hardcover on this lot. Weinberger stated the hardcover w-as calculated based on a larger driveway that what is being proposed and should not be an issue. Weinberger stated the Applicant is aware that he needs to comply with the 25 percent hardcover limit on this application. There were no public comments regarding this application. Lindquist commented his only concern with this application was the lack of a turnaround and the impact to hardcover should a turnaround be constructed, Beutler indicated he is aware of those concerns. PAGE 9 ,1 IT h. i?-A:.i if I MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 17, 2000 Kluth noted the proposed residence encroaches upon the average lakeshore setback by a few feet. and inquired whether it would be possible to relocate the house out of the setback. Beutler stated the lot has topography issues, which are solved by pushing the house back a little bit. Beutler indicated the location of the c.xisting driveway is where the new driveway will be constructed, with the dirt then being able to be utilized to correct the drainage problems on this lot. Beutler stated if the plan is reversed, it would create an additional drainage problem for the property on the other side. Beutler commented this is die best location for the house based on the topography of the lot. Smith inquired what impact it would have if the house were totally removed out of the average lakeshore setback. Beutler stated if the house is pushed back any further, they w ould lose their view of the lake and would not be taking advantage of the existing natural drainage channels. Weinberger stated the only way to eliminate the average lakeshore variance would be to remove a portion of the proposed residence. Weinberger stated the proposed drainage and grading plan lends itself well to this property and keeps the residence consistent with the other houses in the area. Weinberger noted the house is located approximately mice as far from the lake as required by the ordinance, with tlic only issue being the possible placement of a deck in the future. Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2599, Bob and Wendy Beutler, 684 Tonkawa Road, granting of a variance to lot area and lot width and granting of a variance to the average lakeshore setback to permit a 12’ encroachment into the averase lakeshore setback to allow the construction of a new residence on this lot, with the understandins that there will be no hardcover allowed over the 25 percent limit, and subject to review and approval by City Staff of the drainage and grading plan. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAGE 10 Application Date: 6^1/00 60 Day Deadline: 8/20/00 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner July 10,2000 #2599 Bob and Wendy Beutler 684 Tonkawa Road Variances -- Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (I acre) 29,564 s.f. (.68 acre) Application Summary:The applicants have a proposal to remove an existing house and construct a new house on property located at 684 Tonkawa Road. The lot is located in the LR-IB zoning district requiring a minimum lot size of one acre and a lot width at the lakeshore and structure setback of 140'. They are requesting variances to permit new construction on an undersized lot (.68 acre) having a lot width of 85'. A second variance is requested to permit a 12' encroachment into the average lakeshore setback for a portion of the new residence. The residence would be approximately 100' from the 929.4' OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. Lbt of Exhibits A Analysis Worksheet B Application C Site Location Map D Plat Map E Existing Site Survey F Proposed Site Plan G Hardcover Calculation Worksheets H Hardcover Removals I Elevation Views J Floor Plans K Property Owners Notification Form Pertinent Code Sections 1.Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. M2599 Bob and Wendy Beutier 6S4 Tonktwa Road July 17. 2000 TT A portion of the proposed house encroaches 12‘ into the defined average lakeshore setback, 2.Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) Required lot width 140’ Lot width 85* Required lot size 1 acre Lot size 0.68 acre Issues I.Conformity to Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan The site plan indicates the proposed setbacks 10' to the side property lines and would be located more than 75' from the lakeshore. The existing deck is within the 75' lakeshore setback. The entire house would be located approximately 100’ from the lakeshore, which meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for new structures. The primary concern is the 12' encroachment into the average lakeshore setback that has been established by the adjacent structures. The site line issue is with the adjacent property to the north. A small portion of the proposed house is within the setback. However the proposed house would be located 20' further back on the lot than the existing structure. The proposed visual impact would be minimal. A detached garage has been located near Tonkawa Road for many years. The building is located 8.5* from the front property line, where 10' is required. The applicants have stated they would not remove the building. II.Decks/Patios The proposed plan does not indicate any proposed decks or patios on the lakeside of the house. The hardcover that is proposed within the 75-250' setback does not allow for any additional hardcover in the future as it is proposed at 24.99% where a ma.ximum 25% is permitted. It would not be in keeping with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Code to permit additional hardcover on the lot in the 75-250' setback. The only way to accommodate decks or patios within the hardcover limits will be to reduce hardcover elsewhere. This is potential issue as the elevation view shows a second level patio door with no deck. III.Shared Driveway The lot has a driveway that connects with the lot to the north. Both lots also have individual access to Tonkawa Road. The shared portion of the driveway would be remov ed from the subject lot to reduce hardcover and close the shared portion of the driveway. The survey submitted by the applicant does not indicate an easement for driveway purposes. #2599 Bob and Wendy Bcullcr 684 Tonkawa Road July 17,2000 1^^ P- IV. Gradin^/Drainage Staff has requested the applicant provide a grading and drainage plan indicating the new house would not adversely effect adjacent properties. As of the date of this memo, the City of Orono has not received the grading plan. The grading plan shall be approved by Staff prior to the issuance of a building permit should the Council approve the variances as requested. Staff Recommendation Staff makes the following recommendations: To approve the variance application for lot area and lot width based on the fact the lot is developed as a single family dwelling, has been provided sanitaiy sewer ser\ ice and it would not be possible to acquire additional land to create a conforming lot. To approve the average lakeshore setback variance to permit a 12* encroachment into the average lakeshore setback based on the following findings: Construction of the house in the proposed location places the house 100' from the lakeshore. The proposed location of the house best utilizes the topography of the lot. Using the flat area of the property would permit a house to constructed without requiring additional grading beyond what would normally be permitted with new home construction. Impacts to the lakeshore views for the property to the north would be minimal. The existing house is located 20 ’ closer to the lakeshore than the proposed new house. Options for Action; 1, Recommend approval of variances. 2.Recommend denial of variances, stating reasons. 3.Table for additional information. 4.Other action. #2599 Bob «nd Wendy Beutler 684 Tonkawi Road July 17. 2000 Lr... ANALYSIS WORKSHEET A Lot Area; V LR-IB Lot Area Required 43.560 s.f. (1 acre) Actual 29.564 s.f. (.68 acre) Structural Coveraee ; Hardcover Calculations; Applicant shall provide revised hardcover calculations with the grading and drainage plan to indicate hardcover is in conformance with the calculatior." that have been provided. #2599 Bob and Wendy Beuticr 684 Tonkawa Road July 17,2000 Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 29,564 s.f.Allowed: 4.434 s.f. (15%) Existing: 1,759 s.f. (6%) Proposed: 3,585 s.f. (12%) Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover E.xisting hardcover Proposed hardcover 0-75'6,376 s.f.0 s.f (0%)1,286 s.f (20.1%) 492 s.f (7.7 %) 75-250'14,878 s.f.3,719.5 s.f (25%) 5.201 s.f (34.9%) 3,718.5 s.f (24.9%) 250-500’8,310 s.f.2.493 s.f (30%) 3.357 s.f (40.4%) 1,858 s.f (22.3%) i h L. B CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional vziriance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 ’ After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Application # 3599 Date Received Amount Paid , oro^o____ Property Identification Number (T.I.D.) OX- //~7 -'2.2 33 X---------------- Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired__________________________________________(raonth/year) I (do) /do not> also own the adjacent parcels of land. ^ ^ a • • • * ---------------------------------------------------- j ^ * Present use of property: residential Zoning District: / G other (specify). APPLICANT Phone fhomeY^ /J.—S' Name /?o^yOevo ScJ^ler- Phone (work)(^A_ AHHress- /r^V _ City:ar:o;lg__________ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name_____________________ Phone (home) Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ^OO.CCV Describe request in detail: (, WVtvtU li •Vp •C^\aX CV liu^Mv g v\^^te^*■vv^f^^Avra). ARI^' y L !/^ Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear / Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property con^o^ orienting compliance with Zoning Code requirements: UC pm__^ o | CL -J-U3Vc>4-_ KA&^0(^>vor-iVnOlcL’ U^-o C-nr- Q r Vs (attach additional sheets if necessary) .•' ^ -I *. •* *0 . ^ J J .•?, /■ .. .------------------------■ Cv-Cw^<^>-vv-^ . J(r KoWc«'-v ■- - \; A ^ \t>Sv^OM<L U3'.;Av„viA, ' - r m ►S •** '•p •\/T*"' ».< o#.. v^ ✓•/ I «I .V %ij WlAA cn 1l5 la j 1C VI ^SOMEBSIT 5| BATS BE BO / \ 400 ^ • V *•• #• • «• ?:-.• V-; • • •• • • ••. • Nort. i ' t ^ Fr-„S '^ffo eco ••••. • .•t* •• •• ' ; . '.1 •' I •• V. J".;-*- •.' w <Arm ‘ •, ^ •• •• • •■ •'. - *' r?uy r t*. •*•• ^ . ■ * * *•• • *',**<*•-i •• / X • '. •■: ‘ • • '*• ’ n n 2 'r ' • *.■ *' LJ V / Crystal \ N . • : i \. %m **•• V Bay]-- V •■..••• •. • • I• • V * • -/ /-23 sJinrOiiiCA \ -*/ I • ••*•?• • • • >i ‘M. • A4Iknaitf1^MMBl ’. ■ . ^.AK.'D.^^'^JlLr^yt^ TtC» Mrf- i-k mivi .. «/ti k « i rA" •»• • • ••o i ^ ^ - .V CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JOHN ROESLER IN LOTS 5 AND 6. PARTEN' S POINT FIRST DIVISION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA V-t- # \ \ 'A \ X \ \ /75* SfTBAC4< tlKIg- \ nqbim tM cr f«Cfownt m I lOt Si % rOM< 9m\t OMWw • • \ c, Q \ ’» In' <9 MO»fH l*€^ ^ **iot 1 PA/imrt KMt rmi ow«Oi zso* S^re^i V .•* 41 (H) f ,-5y •••V V...\ 'j<- >i ■.;» Li :i *■ j i r ■- J: .-4 SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ryi<;TiNG hardcover in zone A. House _____________X HARnrOVT^ CALCULATION WORKSHEET 75-250’250-500' Length Width B.Garage C.Driveway D.Sidewalk E.Patio/Deck F.Landscape Underlain By Plast'o G.Otb'^r X X X X X X X X X X X X A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ^ . / Zfi +B •*- B X 100 X 100 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _____________X Length Width B.Garage C.Driveway D.Sidewalk E.Patio/Deck F.Landscape Underlain By Plastic G.Other X X X IS- X X X X X X X X X !(? r TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE +B X 100 IZ2T^ /Z.<I /cSS V / 500-1000' VS'^/ r-T !±ZS iTO 3 /zro ZO. /6 300 </7 2- ii2 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. G "U /.f3' S.FJ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % "% A "7> S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ‘ ."•* V •- 47>.A h}r ' N . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B p..■ r HARDCOVER CALCULA SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ FYTSTINC HARDCOVER IN ZONE A.House______________X ____ WORKSHEET 250-300’500-1000’ Length Width B.Garage X X X 3,7/£ _ T,H ^3 IciC TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE3 7;r-r __^ B X 100 or ZS'S /cc -7 I • '■-? .f • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. C.Driveway X B me S.F. X 83 S.F. D.Sidewalk X =.S.F. X ZZ / ?r S.F. E.Pario/Dcck X --..r/ (c.S.F. X =S.F. F.Landscape X •S3 S.F. Underlain X =S.F. Bv Plastic X «S.F. G.Other X a 2/r S.F. • TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ^,icf S.F. TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •/H. r?T S.F. A S,Zol .+B ii,T7r X 100 -% A +B w X 100 =•% PROPOSED hardcover IN ZONT A.Hniice ^ 1 X HO S.F. Length X NMdih ss ni-^S.F. Co'/'rx X r =(oO S.F. ^ S'/*to X X / 6 /c. ^S.F. B.Garaee zz X zz ‘/a^S.F. /tz Zl (o C.Driveway r.i.X 9'=H9L S.F. hr X /r) 2-)o -{[37.3 ) -2 JO.7 S.F. D.S'^ewalk —tr---------- ZH X / 3 77.S.F. X «=S.F. E.Patio/Deck X ss S.F. X =S.F. F.Landscape X S.F. Underlain X «S.F. By Plastic X 38 S.F. G.Other X >S.F. A B W c •.* >• ^ :• 'V r* *>> r<: *tfe uiy-/ Y. 2V.?7 S.F. A S.F. B % I »t: Fr*'E.J* Iff-, *I V, ..;' HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORK SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE OiVE) 0-75*75-250* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______________ Length B.Garage C.Driveway D.Sidewalk E.Patio/Deck F.Landscape Underlain By Plastic G.Other X X X» X Width X X X X X X X X X A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONT TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 2,2S1 ____^ B ^310 ^ B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X Length Width X X X B.Garage 3C 2Z C.Driveway Z-G D.Sidewalk ■ E.Patio/Deck F.Landscape Underlain By Plastic G.Other S'Curves ty X X X X X X X X X lO TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE fh'sy +B d'^ic 500-1000* X 100 X 100 s= rs X 100 I T>*l rr/j>l n 2/ 2^ 21^ nr HO.H cal 370 /f'O 2r<:? 2f~ I'lTsr ^'ZIO •z.Z.3 S.F.I S.F. S.F. S.F.^'‘) ! S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. y 3 10____S.F. _______% % A B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. . S.F. S.F. KJ ■ 1} r ‘ ’4 5 rt* i •• S.F. A S.F. B % i' ^ ' t *____ mm ^^i«* ••“fe -. - • -ii o,P'y:r^ c.>V-» 'V'4/r-vc-y % i-^**/ I-; ' x 1 / . iJ K-x/y 0-^ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JOHN ROESLEP IN LOTS 5 AND 6. PARTEN' S POINT FIRST DIVISION HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA ri/|ROe9v£R ReMivAus Air< I •, I . • ' • I ',> ..fi :• I I I \'. h ·,,; . I �1 .. . ' ., : , . I .. J . 1 I I .. ·':, ·1.I ., , - #4 . • r• I J • I .I 1� 1: . I, . ', ' .. ,• • I' j ,, ' . t , ...,h I! r J· �-1 I I .' I . { ' .. ' • .. 't I :' • � I '.'1� ·1. ' l .. ! ,! � �1 I I • .. ' I rf I,' ! ' . '. . . . . � I 11 f 1t I • ' i., f,.' : I .. ,, ,, t.-. \ ·�t : .f '• ; ' . I • . . . r -� , .. � �,.�i .i. . I I J' .t :r ---��·E.1..a ✓.-.p 0� .. . "Sc."""' iJ+ ... u .... - • I ', I•" � •. I I l .. .\ f .. f.. I I . ' J •I ,1 j I. ,I I l ' r i . ' rI Iii j I I ,. . .. ' i! . \I . ' , . t • ' l iI J l • t f I ' I I l �I \ ' ' I I • j � '-l- 0 ' ) a..�-] �, I ··)• I i' I .. I • • I •: ' I . ·i'.i ... : ,: ,J. I". I . ' ' 't .. • i, )l • J. \j i ·.J. i 'I ''·' ,. • .. ,; ·l ;{ "'. ·� ·. I I • •◄, 't ;. . •, ,· • I .' , 'i . I I ,. : ·., .,, I .; .. I •. , '. l . � t f l t. I I I l ' i I I • ' t t l I l, I I 't . I ,. -, . t •. • I • ' r , �•... • ••• •• , r I 1" r :., r--r .' • .' I . ., � J.r.�4.A.J .._�p.. .., -----· .. . . . ·-·-----· 1 -·.. .��J.. .. -. ·-···-:-.. -- · --- tr.-•· ---:-:� ��-�; � . t , -·-----,---•LL -l �� ♦ • --· -t- --- ...L.-� u--· -•---------1 r fa-11I. ' I I l I ... l •·· • I f I• • :: -�� • � L� ••.•-. .. ... _ ... l • • � • .• • ! •• -11.,_,,.,_, ____ _ • p., ·• I """· s,• .... ----·---------. ·------......... .. ... � ..-� ... �. -4·---T-�-------- ,t•-') .. .,.._ ___ --,--7 -·------ ' I I .... 41• � ...... ••" •4•--tti......_�..,,. ... , •• J I 1 ••�.,....... I .. ,. •fr� ..!::0·• .. !$<>. :l I I 1r��•--I ·1 l i J �I h, •..I I I "' I�: � t.1•••rr. '11 .,..,,� ... I I I I ..... ,, I • t -�, ._ -,7 I: 1 , I l��-,1-··•·· b{.r J,l f t�·�. : ntr I 1),.!,J-, �• I t .... � I ' r J • t ..� '• ,·. I I' " ...... ,....,,_ ........... 6·-•·· � ...... ••··s· I I 1: 1· I t'),.�T6t :--Y, ... �l l I I �..-f,�T .-.....if ----·-�.J I !. 1 J-. ·f- f. ' -I. .. • I -··--------------------,------.-----------------------•i--- i •. I I I , i ·I•l 1 • I I i l I i IATE I SM • HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSItN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST ».M *wit* PAGE 'V.'*E ■t ■■ ASM vimcil MAIIE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR M «-ll7-25 55 OOOa 0A47A TONKAMA RD OAREL J LfclPOLO DAREL J LEIPOLO A70 TONKANA RO LONG LAKE HN 5535A >iii L PROf AMR OWNER HARE TAXPAYER NANE/AMR U tS-il7-25 55 aOll ••AM- TONKAHA RD J SUNOET • R SUNDET JOHN A REBECCA SUNDET , ••A TONKAMA RO LONG LAKE NN 5555A t PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR M fS-U7-25 55 ••7BB TONKANA RO T H SPOONER i J N SPOONER TED H SPOONER !•••$ SUNAC CIR EDEN PRAIRIE NN 555A7 k m- ‘i' m SB 05-117-25 55 0009 60A70 TONKAMA RD 6E0RCE L TORKELSON ETAL GEORGE L TORKELSON A70 TONKAMA RO LONG LAKE HN 55356 SB 05-117-25 55 0010 006B0 TOroCAMA RD HELINDA LEE HELINDA LEE ABO TONKAMA RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 SB ■ 05-117-23 33 0012 00A90 TONKAMA RO H S BRADLEY 1 0 H BRADLEY HICHAEL S A OLIVIA H BRADLEY 13905 IVYMOOD ST N H ANDOVER HN 5S30A 3B 05-117-23 33 0013 00A92 TONKAMA RO BARBARA PUGH BARBARA PUGH 692 TONKAHA RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 SB 05-117-2S SS 0019 00665 TONKAMA RD TEHPLE ISRAEL OF HINHEAPOLIS TEHPLE ISRAEL OF HINHEAPOLIS 2326 EHERSON AVE S HPLS HH 55605 TOTAL BATCH 501 OOOOB MEiATTrv THAT Tiir FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUEmSSotAUM i" iSJ5!Sa?5!!! ii^T APrtARS THIS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF tlY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE '»-* y TrrriR i.-'-.x;..-. i*v3i :Wm itrrat] r«»5iiririTti [ij IMIMI MCtMtlVlt M •! wMti [iliriliKtV'.ltltlCtj A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (C) AND SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (D) FILE NO. 2600 WHEREAS, Brian J. Kerber, (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner of the property located at 740 Orchard Park Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 15, subject to road, Orchard Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 17,2000, at which time all persoi -s desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) to permit construction of a 2,160 s.f. pole bam (60' X 36') where 2,000 s.f. is allowed, and Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to permit the existing garage to be relocated on the property 72.9' from the north property line where 100' is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1.This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2600, Page 1 of 6 Application Date: Deadl·ne: 6/21/00 8/20/00 AUG 1 4 2000 '-'' , , ur-unONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approv I: ame Paul Weinberger Administrator R iewed: Title Zoning Administrator Item D cription: #2600 Br· an J. K.erber 740 Orchard Park Road Variances DATE: August 1 2000 ITE NO.: Agenda Section: Zoning Zoning: RR-IA One Fam·ly Rural Residential 5 Acre Minimum lot size Application Review . The City Council voted 4 to 1 to approve the variance request for Brian Kerber to permi construction of a 60' X 36' (2,160 square foot) pole barn on a 4.8 acre property where the Code permits a maximum structure of 2,000 square feet and a second variance to p rmit relocation of the two stall garage 72.9 from the side street lot line where 100' is r quired. Staff has prepared a resolution to be adopted by th Council approving application #2600. COUNC ACTIO-REQUESTED Mof on to approve the attached resolution. 2. 3. This property is located in the RR-1A Zoning District, where 5 acres is the minimum lot area. The property consists of approximately 4.8 acres allowing a 2,000 s.f. oversized accessory building and a total aggregate of 4,000 s.f for all accessory buildings on the property. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 17, 2000 and recommended approval by a vote of 3 to 2. 4.The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. B. C. The property is located in the 5 acre “rural” area of the City along County Road 6 and Orchard Park Road. There are two adjacent residential properties. Neither of the buildings would be fully visible to adjacent properties, and would not be visible to the property to the south based on the mature trees between the lots. The house, across Orchard Park Road, is blocked from view to much of the applicant’s property by mature trees along the road. Relocating the garage to another portion of the property would not be possible without replacing the septic system, which is depicted on the site survey. The existing system has been determined to be non-compliant due to the 3' separation to the water table, however it is not required to be replaced until 2010. Additional testing has been completed to locate a future primary and secondary site on the west side of the property. Staff has confirmed the location of the septic tanks and drainfield restrict the property from allowing construction of a pole bam behind the house. South of the drainfield, the property drops off and is very low, the water table and drainage would be a concern. This would also require extensive regrading and constmction of a very long driveway to the rear of the property. D.The existing drive would provide access to the pole bam. This does require the removal of a two stall garage which has recently been renovated with a new roof Page 2 of 6 i % \ 7,-; ' 5.The City Council finds the building size required is consistent with the intended use of the building. The applicant has stated the reason to construct a building with a minimum size of 36 feet wide by 60 feet in length is necessary to permit storage of a 56' truck and trailer used for a private business. Without the additional length and width it would not be possible to park the vehicle indoors. 6.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property' in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 7.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, .\ND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) to permit construction of a 2,160 s.f. pole bam (60' X 36') where 2,000 s.f. is allowed, and Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to permit the existing garage to be relocated on the property 72.9' from the north property line where 100' is required. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, completed by Advance Surveying and Engineering Co., dated June 21,2000. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. Page 3 of 6 - 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The height of the pole building shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Zoning Code. A restrictive covenant shall be filed in the chain of title alerting future property owners of the restrictions that apply to oversized accessory structures. Property owner agrees to limit the accessory buildings on the property to one 36' X 60' pole bam and one 22' X 24' garage as shown on the site plan attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 14,2001). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of August, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner (s) Page 4 of 6 ¥ i * ^ ' ' V t* STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss, ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of August, 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of,., 2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 yviccs viih M wlih iliown oo the lurvcy. have been thown. trrtnll wt deemed important . mofMiiiicots to mafk Ibe comers of the property. County Road No 6 >* Application Date: 6/21/00 Deadline: 10/19/00 MEETING AUG 1 4 2000 11 Unu<vu REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 1,2000 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Zoning Dbtrict: Lot Area: List of Exhibits: i/2602 Thomas and Jennifer Graham 1065 Tamarack Drive Subdivision RR-1B One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) 5.1 acres A Site Plan/Preliminary Plat B Draft Resolution C Planning Conunission Minutes (July 17,2000) D Planning Report (July 10,2000) Application Review: The property is a developed 5.1 acre property that is proposed to be subdivided to create a second 2.0 acre building site north of the existing house. The existing lot was platted as part of the Underhill Farms Addition in 1976. A pond is located on proposed Lot 2. A Flowage and Conservation Easement was granted at the time the Underhill Farms Addition was recorded. Both lots meet or exceed the standards of the Zoning and Subdivision Codes. Hennepin County has requested additional right-of-way for trail purposes along County Road 6. The right-of-way requested would be 50' from the center line of the road. This would require about 1 O' of additional right-of-way for future trail purposes. The first 40' had been previously acquired by Hennepin County. The right-of-way would be dedicated on the final plat. The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Trail Plan has designated this portion of the trail as a futiue connection to the regional system. Future use of existing barn located on proposed Lot 1: The Planning Commicsion recommended an 18 month time period the accessory building could be left on Lot 1 without a building permit. The property owner has stated they do not intend to sell the lot for development for an extended time period beyond the 18 months as suggested by the Planning Commission. Property owners have stated the building is in very good repair and would like to keep I \ e% i Request for Council Action continued Page, 2 June 22,2000 #2602 Thomas and Jennifer Graham the building for storage while the two properties are owned in common. The applicants have stated they would agree to filing a covenant on the chain of title alerting future property owners a time limit would restrict the length of time the building would be permitted to remain on the property once the lots are no longer under common ownership. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend approval of the preliminary plat with the understanding that the storage bam will be removed or a residence constructed on Lot 1 within 18 months of recording of the final plat. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the conditions of the attached resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt or amend to attached resolution. ..• -� ----N 57•42• 00" E 428.66 --------.... ,.,,. . , .. ., 7\ � I �-v � .�. ----------------- ---------.. > 1. ... ' ,. ... , J lJ�l \ \CPT•( !L ---·· J -=:.. I ... - ------·--- ----------------·-- :aP::,s--0 ,.....,, Q o, ... ,o,...r.. _..... L1 .. I I, .. f ;-·� -c .... c ... ::�•.t; ·\v \-------7 I I \. .-.u-.,,t I "\ .•• •• f I .. t�"'c." fop ...... , ...... , -_, � I . : , ____ __, _______ _ -----------------------�-------------------- '0"'CX.C_(j !'i"•C ✓' l"f L-2a2. 75 .11-1 l"OJ• ,.�H ENNEPIN C o u,v ry -, ...•p' \ � - 2 ·, I -] ::<:STINC -41) � � .}.I 11<�'1 Tl'14, Z.7 " ll(llf �;I.,, - ..... : I ----...;:,•�-' ........ ...... 81 I '-'.:::,...,, A. ii I '�� ..... I \ ..._ ..... ' ..... I \ ' ..... \ !I \ ', ' �I J '\ I I '' ,, I I • '\\. I I \\ 11 ,., ,, '-!, I I ...._ � I I ....._ \\ 8 1 J P O N O \\ � I I \ I I \ ' J I \' �,"""' \ ;., I ' -/ \\ f\.01ua: � COCSil]h& ,0,, ( .a li. IC.,· ) \ t I I \ -� I \ I '-.... 1 .! --.... _ ,� ----..._ --. ..... _ � --- --- .,,,,,,,..--I -�����---�-�-��� ••• --- -- - � -I .. . ----... --�oo-. ·--· � ----- ROA D 'VO.1�1}!1J -lat20.at A-oJ-o4•3e I °l7• .Jo .. -.. R-22St 14·5 / " rr ·,, I I I I 'J l�' \ � N N ..,. co II" :c 1- • w > � u 0:: <!: � <l: r-- :• OF LECAl. OCSCRF � CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THOMAS GRAHAM LOT 3. BLOCK 1, UNDERHIL L HENNE PfN COUNTY , MINNE SOT Lot }. :loc C&RJ.4$ ·otes •�n I '5 91\0• I", :f e :;.a� it-11 ends 10 tlW loccl•on c" on p,opos� tt.� i:"ro,0�1 o, �t()O( 1n CSSJ of I n, and l l c,u,po,t =o 0 ,w c:.\Y ot ... \, f- t A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR FOR A TWO LOT SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1065 TAMARACK DRIVE PID 26-118-23 31 0009 FILE NO. 2602 WHEREAS, Thomas Graham and Jennifer Graham (hereinafter the "subdividers") on June 21, 2000, filed an application with the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") requesting subdivision for a property located at 1065 Tamarack Drive within the City of Orono and legally described as: Lot 3, Block 1, Underhill Farms, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono ’s Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 17, 2000, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on August 14, 2000 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the subdividers noting the following findings of fact: FINDINGS 1.The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous diy buildable land within each newly created lot. 2.The property contains a total of 5.1 acres of land, with 4.7 acres being dry buildable. Page 1 of 6 [ / I 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Lots 1 and 2 each meet the minimum size requirements for lots in the RR-IB zoning district. Minimum lot requirements are 200' of frontage along the front property line and 2.0 acres of dry buildable area. Chris Pence, On-Site Systems Manager, has approved the septic design as submitted by the applicants. Lots 1 and 2 have each demonstrated two suitable septic sites meeting required setbacks. Hennepin County has requested additional right-of-way to be measured at a total of 50' from the centerline of County Road 6. Most of the requested right-of-way has been previously acquired by Hennepin County. An additional 8 to 10' would be required. The additional right-of-way would be held for a future trail corridor. A Flowage and Conservation Easement was previously dedicated on the plat of Underhill Farms in 1976 for the pond and wetland areas located over proposed Lot 2. According to the title and surv'ey information supplied by the subdividers, no drainage and utility easements have been dedicated along the property' lines. The subdividers would be required to dedicate such easement as required by the Subdivision Code. An existing bam is located on proposed Lot 1 and would remain on the property following recording of the subdivision. The subdividers have requested the building be allowed to remain on the property and be used for storage for the time period Lots I and 2 are held in common ownership. At such time Lot 1 would be sold out of common ownership with Lot 2, such conditions would be placed on the accessory building defining the time period the building would be permitted to remain without a principal building. Lot 2 would not have direct access to Tamarack Drive and would not be permitted access to County Road 6. The property owners would prefer to use the existing driveway that would te on Lot 2. A second driveway would require removal of mature trees along the road. The existing driveway was designed with the orientation of the existing house. A separate driveway for proposed Lot Page 2 of 6 V •i- 2 would make maneuvering a vehicle to access the garage difficult. Both properties shall enter into a Maintenance Agreement that would describe each lot owner ’s responsibility for maintenance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for Thomas Graham and Jennifer Graham per preliminary plat drawings by Mark Gronberg, Coffin & Gronberg, Inc., dated 6-21-00, attached hereto as Exhibit A and on file with the City of Orono, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. An easement shall be granted in favor of Lot 2 for driveway access to the property. The subdividers shall enter into a driveway maintenance agreement describing each lot ’s obligation for maintenance and use of the driveway. Payment of standard Park Dedication Fee per City ordinance. Drainage and Utility Easements shall be dedicated on the plat 10' along exterior property lines and 5' along interior property lines. Subdividers shall enter into a restrictive covenant to be filed on the chain of title for both properties describing the use of the existing bam that would remain on Lot 1 without a principal structure. Subdivider shall dedicate on the final plat property for future trail corridor extension as requested by Hennepin County. Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire one year from the date of Council preliminary plat approval. Should the subdivider fail to complete the filing of the final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. Final Plat Submittals: Page 3 of 6 F The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1.Record plat drawings in the form of t^o (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City's records and one for filing with -u'nnepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: a.Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark Gronberg, Coffin & Gronberg, Inc., dated 6-21-00. b.Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10' wide along the exterior boundaries of property and 5' along the internal lot lines. 2.Legal documents required: a.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b.The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c.Restrictive covenant describing the future use of the existing bam. 3.Fees to be paid: Total due: $400.00* a.Final plat fee = $200.00 b.Legal review and filing fees for subdivision and associated documents $200.00 c.Park Dedication Fee shall be determined by the City Assessor based on the fair market value of the undeveloped land at the time of preliminary plat approval. The subdivider shall be advised as soon as Assessor's report has been filed with City. Park dedication fee shall be based on 8% of the fair market value of land within the plat. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular Page 4 of 6 meeting held this 14th day of August, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of August, 2000, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor 8c City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 I' • • i ... --... - • •- e1••1· oo· c .. -··-·· ··-··-·· . -·· I f4i,-f • v• I -··-·· •;• 1. I, •• � I ----·· t ... -----••·-··�··-··--· • ------------------------------... 1 ,--' 1,. I \ , , I I I I I I I I I , ' I t ' ' , ' , , ONO I I I ,.,' I ' ., I I , '--_ .. ROAD tvo•6 ,' I I ' ' ' ' H-1 --·- \ \ 'I I ' ' _ .... I • Jo .. l"'lO 7 --------- ' w > er N 0 • � u ..,,,,. a:: <( � <( ,-- 0 .. ,. C RTIFICA T OF SURVEY AND PR UMINARY PLAT FOR THOMAS GRAHAM LOT 3, BLOCK 1, U DE HILL FARM H[ NEPIN CO N Y. Ml N SOTA '• '° ..... 0 '° cu I !^ U- MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 17,2000 ^ (W) #2602 JOHN GRAHAM, 1065 TAMARACK DRIVE-PROPOSED TWO LOT SUBDIVISION, 7:18 p.m. - 7:50 p.m. John Graham, Applicant, was present, along with Thomas and Jennifer Graham. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication. Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting a subdivision of a developed 5.1 acre parcel into two lots, with one new building site being created consisting of 2.0 acres north of the existing house. The c.xisting lot was platted as part of the Und'crhil' Farms Addition in 1976. A pond is located on the property located on what would be the southern lot, with a flowage and conservation casement being granted at the time the Underhill Farms Addition was recorded. Weinberger stated Lot 1 would be the nc.\t building site and would meet the minimum lot size and width for lots in the RR-IB Zoning District. Based on the survey submitted, the building pad is located within the required setbacks and all setbacks arc met to the drainficld sites. This lot w'ould share a drivewav with Lot 2, with an casement being granted in favor of Lot 2 for• * access over Lot 1. Using the existing driveway would eliminate the need to cut down any trees and works w ell with the existing house. Relocation of the driveway would result in the driveway completely circling the house and come close to encroaching into the wetland setback area.. Weinberger noted there is an existing storage building that would be located on Lot 1 w ithout a principal building. Weinberger suggested the building remain for a defined length of time before the principal building is constructed on the property or if the ow nership changes between Lot 1 and Lot 2. Weinberger stated Lot 2 would not have direct access to Tamarack nor to County Road 6. The property ow ners would prefer to use the existing driveway located on Lot 2. Lot 2 also meets the minimum requirements for subdivision. Hennepin County may have additional requirements for that portion of property located along Count\' Road 6. Weinberger noted according to the survey PAGE 11 >-■ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 17, 2000 w all land along County Road 6 and Tamarack has been dedicated to the public. Weinberger indicated tlic City Council has recently adopted a new Septic Code that permits slopes of up to 12 percent for mound systems. Previously sites could only have a six percent slope. Both lots have demonstrated two sites on each lot that would permit the land to be subdivided with the new standards and have been approved by the Septic Inspector. Weinberger stated tlic standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat ten feet along the exterior property lines and five feet along the interior property lines, with an easement and maintenance agreement being recorded with the final plat for the shared driveway access. A certified list of all casements recorded on the property shall be submitted prior to final plat application. Weinberger recommended the property owner pay a park dedication fee for one new lot rather than offer land for a park dedication. City Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary' plat since both lots meet the requirements for subdivision in this zoning district and have demonstrated suitable septic sites. Graham stated at the present time there arc no plans to develop Lot 1 at the present time, although they may wish to develop Lot 1 sometime in the future. Graham noted they have recently purchased the property in September. Smith inquired what amount of time they were contemplating before Lot I would be developed. Graham stated they arc easily looking at five, six or seven years before they would develop Lot 1. Graham commented they would like to keep the existing storage building since ownership of both lots would not change w'ith this subdivision. Smith inquired whether the Applicant would be interested in relocating the shed onto Lot 2. Graham stated they have discussed that, but at diis time have not made a definite decision on relocating the building. Graham stated the building is in good shape at the present time. Graham PACE 12 r- r\. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 17, 2000 inquired whether it would be possible to waive the park dedication fee since the> currently have almost a one-half acre of a conservation easement dedicated to the City. Weinberger stated the park dedication fees are a result of the existing land and are required on each new lot created. Weinberger noted the City Council makes the final determination on whether the park dedication fee can be waived. Currently City Ordinance requires tliat a park dedication fee be paid on every new lot created. Graham indicated he has no further comments regarding his application, There were no public comments regarding this application. Smith inquired whether an outlot for this subdivision should be created to deal with the issues relating to the shared driveway. Gaffron stated the City typically \ 'll request an outlot be created in the situation of a baek lot/front lot situation. Gaffron stated the City has many shared driveways at the present time. Stoddard commented it was his understanding the City was attempting to keep away from easements and request outlets. Stoddard noted this property consists of 5.1 acres, which may not leave enough room for the creation of an outlot. Gaffron stated the City tvpically docs not require an outlot on a shared driveway serving two residences, but tends to look at it differently if there are more houses being serviced bv the drive wav. Stoddard stated that keeping the existing building may need to be reviewed further prior to approval. Lindquist inquired whether the two lots would be kept combined for ta.\ purposes. Graham stated he would like to keep them combined. Weinberger indicated once they are subdivided, they become two separate tax parcels. Weinberger stated in a Class I t\pe subdivision, which would allow two conforming lots to be PAGE 13 f I ‘ MINUTES OFTHE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 17,2000 separated at that point, but it would require a new subdivision application if you were to separate two combined lots. Weinberger stated the Applicant could consider the option of obtaining preliminary plat approval and e.xtending that approval every year. Graham stated they utilize the building currently for storage. Kluth noted City Code does not permit an aeeessory building to e.xist on a lot without a prineipal strueture. Graham noted ownership of both lots would not change. Graham suggested a period of time be given in whieh the shed has to be either removed or a prineipal structure constructed should ownership of the property change. Kluth inquired why the Applicants arc proceeding fonvard with the subdivision at tliis time if they do not plan to develop the propertv*. Graham stated they would prefer to have the property subdivided at this time sinee they arc able to subdivide the property under the e.xisting codes. Lindquist commented he has concerns with leaving the accessory building on the lot without a principal structure. Stoddard indicated requests are sometimes made to ilie Planning Commission to leave an e.xisting accessor)’ structure while construction is undergoing but not for an unspecified period of time. Smith suggested a period of 18 months be given to allow for the lot to be developed, and if the lot is not developed within that period of time, the shed be relocated elsewhere, Graham stated the use of the property will not change at all until the lot is sold. Stoddard stated Lot 1 needs to conform with the existing City Codes. Graham suggested a condition be placed on the subdivision that upon sale of the lot, the lot must be developed within a certain period of time. Smith inquired whether the City has allowed an aeeessory structure to remain on a lot without a PAGE 14 r’ n t MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 17, 2000 principal structure in the past. GafFron stated a situation did exist on North Arm Drive where a swimming pool remained for tliree or four years and eventually became a problem. Gaffron stated he is not aware of any other situation similar to this. Lindquist stated in his view the Applicant should perhaps be given a year to a year and a half in which to make a decision on what to do with Lot I and the storage building. Weinberger inquired whether a similar situation occurred on Little Orchard Road where the bam was permitted to remain without an existing structure. Gaffron stated it is his recollection the property owner was given approximately a year in which the bam could remain on the lot without a principal structure, but that the owmer was in the process of developing that land. Gaffron stated he docs not have any major concerns with the storage building remaining on the lot w ithout a principal structure provided ownership of both lots docs not change. Gaffron stated there would need to be a covenant on Lot 1 filed with the City once the lot is sold indicating the property needs to be developed within a certain period of time or the shed needs to be removed. Graham stated he would be agreeable with that. Smith inquired whether that would apply if ownership of either lot changes. Gaffron stated both lots would need to remain in common ownership, and as soon as ownership of one lot changes, the covenant would become effective. Nygard stated another trigger w ould be construction on Lot I. Lindquist commented in his view the Planning Commission has been clear on this in the past and they should continue to follow past practices and only allow the shed to remain for a limited period of time if the property is not developed. Graham stated a covenant could contain whatever condition the Planning Commission requested PAGE 15 i. f i f. 1: MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 17,2000 and would show up in the title opinion letter at the time of final plat approval. Lindquist stated it would be his preference that a limited period of time be granted for the shed to remain. Lindquist moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2602, John Graham, 1065 Tamarack Drive, for a two lot subdivision, with the understanding that the storage barn will be removed or a residence constructed on Lot 1 within 18 months of approval of the preliminary plat by the City Council. Smith commented the Applicant may need to look at relocation of the shed if they do not plan to develop this lot within the nc.\t year or two. Graham reiterated the City could require a covenant on tliis property requiring that the shed either be removed or a principal structure be constructed within a certain period of time once ownership of the lot changes. Graham stated that covenant would be recorded with the title and any new' property owner would be aware of the restrictions on that shed. Nygard commented the 18 months gives the Applicant time to look at his options regarding this lot. Lindquist inquired whether the Applicant would like the Planning Commission to vote on the motion that has been made. Graham stated he would like the Planning Commission to go ahead and vote on the motion, VOTE ON THE ABOVE MOTION: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Nygard Opposed. RIAN KERBER, 740 ORCHARD PARK ROADS - VARIANCES, 7:51 p.m. - 8:18 p.m. Brian Kerbcr, Applicant, was present. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. A pp| .ui/. npplifnfu^ r/^qiipgling tfL PAGE 16 3 Application Date: 120 Day Deadline: 6/21/00 10/19/00 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:July 10,2000 SUBJECT:#2602 Thomas and Jennifer Graham 1065 Tamarack Drive Subdivision — Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) 5.1 acres Application Summary:Subdivision of 5.1 acre parcel into 2 lots, with 1 new building site. List of Exhibits A B C D E F G H I Application Location Map Zoning Map Plat Map Topographic Map Section 10.28 Proposed Site Plan Septic Reports Property Owners Notification List Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.28 Standards for lot in the RR-IB Zoning District Required Lot Dimensions 2.0 acres/200' width Proposed Lot 1 2.0 acres dry/200' width Proposed Lot 2 2.7 acres dry/364' width #2602 Thomas and Jennifer Graham 1065 Tamarack Drive Preliminar>’ Subdivision July 17. 2000 pagt-l Application Review The property is a developed 5.1 acre property that is proposed to be subdivided to create a second 2.0 acre building site north of the existing house. The existing lot was platted as part of the Underhill Farms Addition in 1976. A pond is located on proposed Lot 2. A Flowage and Conservation Easement was granted at the time the Underhill Farms Addition was recorded. Lot Standards Lot 1 would be the new building site and would meet the minimum lot size and width for lots in the RR-IB Zoning District. The site plans submitted by Mark Gronberg indicate the building pad is located within required setbacks and all setbacks are met to the drainfield sites as depicted on the survey. The lot would share a driveway with Lot 2. An easement would be granted in favor of Lot 2 for access over Lot 1. The minimum setbacks for the property would be 50’ from the road right-of-way, 30’ from interior lot lines. Please note the site plan indicating the building pad on the property, attached Exhibit G. There is an existing storage building that would be located on Lot 1. The building should be given a reasonable term to remain standing without a principal building. Lot 2 would not have direct access to Tamarack and would not be permitted access to County Road 6.The property owners would prefer to use the existing driveway that would be on Lot 2. A second driveway would require removal of mature trees along the road. The existing driveway was designed with the orientation of the existing house. A separate driveway for proposed Lot 2 would make maneuvering a vehicle to access the garage difficult. Both properties shall enter into a Maintenance Agreement that would describe each lot owners responsibility for maintenance. It is possible Hennepin County may have additional requirements for that portion of property located along County Road 6. Lot Dimensions Lot Summaries:Total Acres Acres Required Lot Width Required Lot Width Proposed Lot 1 3.1 Ac. 2.7 dr>'2.0 Ac.200’200’ Lot 2 2.0 Ac.2.0 Ac.200’364 ’ Total 5.1 Ac. Both lots meet all requirements for subdivision. #2602 Thomas and Jennifer Graham 1065 Tamarack Drive Preliminary Subdivision July 17, 2000 page-2 Septic Rev iew The City Council adopted a new Septic Code recently that does permit slopes of up to 12% for mound systems. Previously, sites could only have a 6% slope. The lots have both demonstrated two sites on each lot that would permit the land to subdivide with the new standards. The designs have been approved by Chris Pence, On-Site Systems Manager. Easements 1. 2. 3. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat 10’ along exterior property lines and 5' along interior property lines. An easement and maintenance agreement shall be recorded with the final plat for the shared driveway access. The easement shall describe the area required to accommodate both lots. A certified list of all easements recorded on the property shall be submitted prior to final plat application. Park Dedication Fee Staff recommends the property owner pay a Park Dedication fee for one new lot rather than offer land for a park dedication. Before Preliminary Plat approval the City Assessor will calculate the market value of the property. The Park Dedication fee is equivalent to 8% of the value of the lot, with a minimum fee of $2,900 and a maximum fee of $4,900. The Park Commission will review the preliminary plat application on August 7,2000, prior to City Council review'. Staff Recommendation Both lots meet the requirements for subdivision and have demonstrated suitable septic sites. Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat. Planning Commission Options for Action: 1. 2. 3. 4. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat and forward to the Council, with conditions. Recommend denial, stating reasons. Table, requesting further information and provide direction to the applicant. Other Action. «2602 Thomas and Jennifer Graham 1065 Tamarack Drive Preliminar> Subdivision My 17. 2000 poge-3 to 12% foristrated twoesigns have 3ng exterior r the shared te both lots. to final plat ;r than offer ;alcalate the le of the lot, will review- sites. Staff conditions. h-* K- Application #(^OSlDate Received '3>Oc>c>Amount PaidCITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONPROPERTY LOCATIONSite address /0Property Identification Number (PID)I OOP 7 Please check one - Property____abstract or X torrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT ^. Name A •_______________ Address City__ Phone (home) Zip____Phone (work) 6S7/pr<:>-3'^ f ^ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name applicant; A e*Jxj I Address /P (cS' ^ ~TW^ a City OCcjjQ_________________ Phone (home) Zip Phone (work) (oQ 73o-S'o‘?ci (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) 0-4 'T. I Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______ Present Zoning District D PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes _________ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) X Subdivision for! ^~w Building Sites J_____Existing Units 1____New Units Total Units Number of Building Sites Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per S’' i Acres 13 0 Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residentid ________Other (specify)_________ (C% y ) SEE MAP 4t3 MEDINA j VHEN RO CHEROKEC RO 2600 I MEAOO«r¥ OOOS TR DEER HUI^ RO COURTR wooos ”Rr"?>^ 5 OAKOTAni r -■ ssn CM r.• > r’.v i • 4 *^V:^ srvioo <UKE RO 01) HfC 800 ^♦c ■ -· NA • • LAKE> �■--����i.7AI� .... ---�---... . . Colin Or. s T£ • • • C: 0 C ����� D - Weter W>O.J 959.!> • 9 2 •• . ... I rl°� Ir §10.28 SEC. 10.28. RR-IB ONE FAMILY RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. r Subd. 1. Purpose. The "RR-IB" One Family Rural Residential District is intended to provide a district which will allow a combination of low density residential development and limited agricultural activity. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. Within any "RR-IB" One Family Rural Residential District, no land or structures shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: A.Any permitted use as regulated in the "R-IA" District. B.Personal Wireless Service Antermas and Towers. 1.Purpo.se and Intent. The purpose of this section is to establish predictable, balanced regulations for the siting and screening of wireless commumcations equipment in order to accommodate the growth of wireless commumcation systems within the City of Orono while protecting the public against any adverse impacts on the City's aesthetic resources and the public welfare. 2.Personal Wireless Service Antennas. Personal wireless service antermas erected on a municipal structure may be allowed as a secondary use by administrative permit, provided they comply with the City policy regarding the use of City-owned property for wireless telecommunication antermas and provided they meet the following conditions: a.The antenna shall be in compliance with the Mirmesota State Building Code and all other applicable federal and state regulations and permits. b.Smictural design, mounting and installation of the antenna shall be in compliance with manufacturers specifications and shall be verified and approved by a registered professional engineer. c.No advertising mesage shall be affixed to the anterma. d.Antennas shall not be artificially illuminated unless required by law or by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to protect the public’s health and safety. e.When applicable, proposals to erect new antenna shall be accompanied by any required federal, state, or local agency licenses. f Transmitting, receiving, and switching equipment shall be housed within the existing structure. If a new equipment building is necessary for transmitting, receiving and switching equipment, it shall be situated in the rear yard of the principal use and shall be screened from view by landscaping. ORONO CC 289 (4-1-84) I §10.28 g.All obsolete and unused antennas shall be removed wthin twelve (12) months of cessation of operation at the site, unless an exemption is granted by the City Administrator or designate. The removal shall be the responsibility of the communication provider. h.Antennas shall utilize camouflaging techniques or shall be side mounted to an anterma support structure in order that such facilities are compatible with the character and environment of the area in which they are located. i.The applicant shall demonstrate by providing a coverage/interference analysis and capacity analysis prepared by a registered professional engineer that the location of the antenna as proposed is necessary to meet the frequency spacing needs of the personal wireless service system and to provide adequate portable personal wireless service coverage and capacity to the area. Source: Ordinance 161,2nd Series Effective Date: 5-27-97 Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any •’RR-IB" One Family Rural Residential District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: A.Uses. Any conditional use as regulated in the "R-1 A" D'strict except for "Duplex Credit" and "Animals". B.Farms (Stock). Provided that the area is ten or more acres. C.Hospitals, Etc. Hospitals for human care, sanitariums, rest homes, nursing homes, provided that all buildings are located 100 feet or more from the lot line of any abutting lot in an "R" District. The site shall contain not less than 600 square feet of lot area for each person to be accommodated. Source: Ordinance No. 185 Effective Date: 6-14-76 D.Libraries. Non-profit libraries provided that all buildings are located 50 feet or more from the lot line of any abutting lot in an "R" District. Screening and signage requirements shall be determined with each individual conditional use permit. Source: City Code Effective Date: 4-1-84 ORONO CC 289-1 (4-1-84) §10.28 Subd. 4. Accessory Uses. Within any "RR-IB" One Family Rural Residential District, the following uses shall be a permitted accessory use: A.Any accessory use as regulated in the "R-1 A” District and Animals as regulated in Section 10.20, Subdivision 3, Subparagraphs M and N. Source: Ordinance 26, 2nd Series Adopted: 7-14-86 Subd. 5. Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements. A.Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. B.Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Lot Lot Front Side Side Yard Adjacent to Rear Area 2 acres Width Yard Yard Street Yard 200 feet 50 feet 30 feet 50 feet 50 feet i- ORONO CC 290 (4-1-84) \. .'.-:. 428.66N 57•42• 00" E -182..n ::fl' \ ,,., ,. � � �------- --- - .. ------------ ---.. ------------7,::-EflA � St: i P ,;:: c•<E:S r .,,.,.1. �rPT,, '·•ti --- 1 : � : ..,, ... J \ .... -(XSTM:-9AANI ... ------.,,,,, ----0 -- , ' - 1'•0.-01, 0 ., "�••.c _,/ \' .._:,(>hO-"i / . /\ .... ( . IV � .... ,. i \ I I ------ S; p .. oq ... ..-•p<,c ' .. . , I' ..I ) g � -__ --- 0 � O"oS�O ..-.... ____ -1_-"''�-----L, .. , /. ------ � -------------------------__ ,:t·___.� ... - l"QOl'O'-£.!, 'rr,< ✓• :-, ;:Vrull.£ r,.,.T,c l•282.75 4-11•oJ• 14 ..IN£PiN Courvry -, � ,� ·-l ' ]I; :.XISTINC , ,;: ""\,; __ I 2. .],1 .1< �ff Tl14, 2.7 !4CIIII ,IA'f ' ; --� ...... •s.-1 I ':::::-. 81 /'.:::: ✓Oo ii I '.::::� I I '.::::-. , ..... I I ' ..._',:I I '-'- ' �I I '' I I '' ,, I I '\\ I f "- f I 'I."' I I 'I. '<r. ,, , ... ,, � 81 I P O N O \'\ :;. I I \' I I \' �, ,, .. , I \ �, ,, ,-I ', 'L.,. aG( ..., C:0,SC,,Y. I'°" ( • SC-<�. '\ J •I f I \ � I \ I '---�=----:i ---�------------.,,,,.,...-1 --.aoOO_-_-_-_-_-_--..--I --··------ao-. ,.:;,.,-,�� -... ROA.o No.I 12•2]• 6 I .Jo .. IrI I I l .. 20,89 A-oJ-c>4• JI""-2251.14 I I N N • CD ... .,__ • w > 0:: 0 ::::s::: u � 0:: <! 2 <::: r-- - CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THOMAS GRAHAM OF LOT 3. BLOCK 1, UNDERHILL FARM HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LECI-L O(SCRf>Tl()N_Of"_�EI.IISE.S : Loi J. Bloc� 1 u:-oEJ.t'ILL FA.RMS o 1er-o:,u rcr mo-lo.er 8eor.rg, sho•" ore �,ea .:pon on o.nu,ned dotum This survey .,,,� to 5'\0• boutloof"•es ol I.he 000 .. e aescrone.d •�opvt,. the location of on e•is1i,,q I\Ov:Se and birn. and INI proposed locat,c,,, ol a propoffd div>Clitlg j;ne lhe<'eCI'\. It does not purpor I to show o,,; ot improvements o- enc rooctvnents. . ' • . • .... 1-..... ,· , .. ,,,. r-:,�• ¥.I -· � . ,.. ' . � -........ , ' •• .J-�:::::::J Westwood Wellen Associates Westwood Professional Services, Inc.y iofZ 3701 12ih Street North Suite 206 St Cloud. MN 56303 Phone: 320-2S3-949S fa* 320 253 8737 Toll Free 1 800 270 9495 Email wpsi^wesiwoodp^ com June 8, 2000 Thomas Graham 1065 Tamarack Drive Orono, MN 55356 RE: Septic System Site Plan for Lot 3, Block 1, UNDERHILL FARMS. Hennepen County. Dear Thomas: This proposed on-site septic system was designed for a 4 bedroom home with an estimated flow of 600 gallons per day. Due to mottled soils at a depth of 12” in the septic site area, the system will need to be a mound system with 24 ” of sand under the rockbed at the upslope side. The site in which this system is proposed has a average existing ground slope of 10% and percolation rates ranging from 17.1 -24.7 MPI. The rock bed size will be 10 feet wide and 50 feet long with the overall dimensions of the mound being 70 feet long and 37.8 feet wide. Two 1000 gallon septic tanks and a 1000 gallon pump tank will be required for this septic system. Based on our evaluation there is adequate room on the property for a alternate septic site. The alternate septic system also is shown and designed. This septic site will also need to be a mound, it can be used in the event of the primary mound failing Certain precautions will need to be made to protect the area in which the above referenced septic systems arc proposed. It is critical that the soil is not disturbed before, during, and after construction of the system. The-septic area should be staked off with visible fencing prior to construction. This system should treat the septic effluent effectively if the system is installed properly and is maintained properly. It is recommenced that the septic tanks be pumped every two years. This will reduce the chance of solids reaching the mound system. It is also recommended not to use excessive amounts of chlorine, soaps, and anti-bacterial products which can kill bacteria in the septic tanks, thus causing the system to fail. This bacteria is needed to treat the septic effluent. If you have any questions in regards to this design, I will be happy to answer them. 1 can be reached at (612)682-2587. Sincerely, Bemie Miller Septic Site Designer MPCA Lie. No. 43 *./ •»# .• ▼ ■;-W :li«> I iiiiiir I. (|.|f %,i > Westwood Wellen Associates Westwood Professional Services. Inc. June 8,2000 Thomas Graham I06S Tamarack Drive Orono, MN 55356 3701 l?ih Noilli '‘Uiic 206 Si L.oud. MN S6303 Phone 320-253-9495 f.it 320 253 8737 Toll Free 1 800 270 9495 Email wp5'-tw<»Mwoo<Jps com RE: Septic System Site Plan for the proposed north 2 acres of Lot 3, Block I, UNDERHILL FARMS, Hennepin County. b Dear Thomas: This proposed on-site septic system was designed for a 5 bedroom home with an estimated flow of 600 gallons per day. Due to mottled soils at a depth of 19 ” in the septic site area, the system will need to be a mound system with 17 ” of sand under the rockbed at the upslope side. The site in which this system is proposed has a average existing ground slope of 6% and percolation rates ranging from 16-25.3 MPI. The rock bed size will be 10 feet wide and 60 feet long with the overall dimensions of the mound being 87 feet long and 41.5 feet wide. Two 1300 gallon septic tanks and a 1300 gallon pump tank will be required for this septic system. Based on our evaluation there is adequate room on the property for a alternate septic site. The alternate septic system also is shown and designed. This septic site will also need to be a mound, it can be used in the event of the primary mound failing Certain precautions will need to be made to protect the area in which the above referenced septic systems are proposed. It is critical that the soil is not disturbed before, during, and after construction of the system. The septic area should be staked off with visible fencing prior to construction. This system should treat the septic effluent effectively if the system is installed properly and is maintained properly. It is recommenced that the septic tanks be pumped every two years. This will reduce the chance of solids reaching the mound system. It is also recommended not to use excessive amounts of chlorine, soaps, and anti-bacterial products which can kill bacteria in the septic tanks, thus causing the system to fail. This bacteria is needed to treat the septic effluent. If you have any questions in regards to this design, I will be happy to answer them. 1 can be reached at (612)682-2587. Sincerely, ' .N Bernie Miller Septic Site Designer MPCA Lie. No. 43 j .V ■.V H MM . DATE M/21/f* ■ATCH SA8 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYST.EM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PX<i354«l PAGE 20 ONNCR NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SR 2A-11R-2S SI OOOA tlSOR SIXTH AVE N JOHN R SHEEHAN JOHN R SHEEHAN ISRR'ATH AVE NO LONG LAKE HN 553SA SR 26-11R-2S 31 0007 01111 TAHARACK DR S L S C A BRENNAN SIDNEY L BRENNAN JR 17105 2ATH AVE N PLYHOOTH HH SSW 3R 26*118-23 31 0008 01059 TAHARACK DR CHARLES C DUNNAVAN CHARLES C DUNNAVAN 1099 TAHARACK DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 I .* ;R NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 38 26-118-23 31 0009 B186R TAHARACK DR T H BRAHAH 8 J J CRAHAN T N ORAHAH 8 J J CRAHAH 188S TANARACK DR LONB LAKE HN 55356 38 26-118-23 31 0010 01330 SIXTH AVE N M E BOHACH 8 S BOHACH WALLACE E 8 SUSAN BOHACH 1330 COUNTY RD 6 LONG LAKE HN 55356 38 26-118-23 36 0005 01135 SIXTH AVE N E W 8 H S SPENCER EDSON W 8 HARRIET S SPENCER 1135 SPRING HILL RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 ‘?i.V PROP ADMI OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR PROP AOOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR TOTAL BATCH SR 26-118-23 36 0008 81295 SIXTH AVE N J 8 N ROTONOO JOHN 8 NAOONNA ROTONO( 1295 SIXTH AVE N LONO LAKE HN 55356 38 26-118-23 62 0006 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED SPRI>M HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HH 55391 38 26-118-23 62 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB 700 SPRING HILL RD WAYZATA HH 55301 /(i t »lS.-1 ..V*- 508 00009 V,i 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AH ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF..n DATE< t REQUEST FOR COU CIL ACTION AUG 1 4 2000 C1 I Y ut-UHONO DA TE: Augu t 10, 2000 ITEMNO.: 1 Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Name Paul Weinberge·r Zoning Title Zoning Administrator Item Descriptjoo: -607 John Vogt/Mike H.lbelink 350 Stubbs Bay Road orth Final Plat of Tamarack Hill Zoning: RR-I B One Family Rural Residential 2 Acre Minimum lot size Application: Vogt/Hilbelink are requesting final plat approval for a subd · is ion of a 14 acre parcel located at 350 Stubbs Bay Road North. The subject property is located in the RR-1 B two acre zonin district. Lot 2 being defined as a back lot, requires 3 acres. The plat wil be known as Tamarack Hill Th -applicants have completed the requirements listed in Resolution o. 4498 approving the Pr liminary Plat: 1.D dication on he plat of standard perimeter drainage and u ility easemen s. 2.Outlot · s platted 50' wide to accommodate a road should one be required in the future to pr vide access to additional lots without direct access to a road Future use of Outlot A as a road shall require approval by the Orono City Council. It is not the 1n nt of the Council that Out ot A be opened for any use other than a dri eway un ii uch time additional rig t-of-way would be required. 3.Drainage easements are dedicated on th final plat and cons auon and flowage easements are granted for all City of Orono protected etlands as iden•: �ed on the Wetland In entory Maps. 4.Covenants will b filed in the chain of title for each lot as an advisory to future property own rs. that primary and secondary drainfi Id site e ist on the property and ar pr t cted. dri · ay main nanc agre ment has b n created to id n ify such maintenanc� f Outl t ot 1 and 2 shall both access Ou lot A. 6. 33' l in ithin the tubbs a R ad orth ri ht-of-a i d di ated on h lat t th public a pub i ri ht-of-a . I • iequest for Council Action continued Page2 August 10, 2000 #2607 Vogt/Hilbelink 7.Payment to the City for the final plat review fee and fee for lega revi -and filing of the plat. easements and covenants in the amount of q:400.00. 8.Payment to the City for park de ication fees for the creation of one ( 1) new lot in the· amC\unt of $4,900. Staff Recommendation: taff recommends approval of the preliminary plat based on the resolution attached. COUNCIL ACTIO REQUESTED To adopt or amend the attac ed resolution. , ' t ' A RESOLUTION PROVI G THE PLAT OFT AMARACK HILL FILE NO. 2607 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota· and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regu ·�ns for e orderly, econom·c and safe developmen of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a nvo (2) lot residential plat by John E. Vogt and Maureen C P. Vogt, husband and wife, and Michael J.Hilbelink and Ann Hilbelink, bu band and wife (hereinafter "the subdividers 11 )· and WHEREAS, the subdivision ha been found to meet all standards of the RR-1B, 2 Acr Single Family Rural Reside.ntial Zonin District finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that would allow its use for a single fam · 1y re idence to be fully dev loped; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed or has agreed to complete all requirements of th platting regulations of the City ., i1 cluciing: 1.Completion of a the requirements of Resolution No. 4498 the resolution granti prelim·nary approval of the subdivision. 2.D di tion on he p at of standard perimeter drainage and uf lity ease�n nts. 3.Outlot A is platted 50' wide to acconunoda ea road should on,.. hP. reQU!r�·d in the future to provide access to additional lots without direct access to a road. Futur use of O tot A as a road shall require approval by the Orono c·ty Counci . It is not the int· nt of h Council that Outlot A be opened for any se other than a dri,·-.. ··ay until uch t1m additiona righ of-way would be required·. Page Io 4 4.Drainage easements a.-,e dedicat d on the final plat and conservation and flowage easements are granted for all City of Orono protected wetlands as identified on the Wetland Inventory Maps. 5.Covenants will be filed in the chain of title for each lot as an advisory to future property o ers that primary and s condary drainfield sites ex· st on the property and are protected. 6.A driveway maintenance agreement has b en created to, identify such maintenance of Outlot A. Lots and 2 shall both access Outlot A. 7.The westerly 33' lying within the Stubbs Bay Road orth right-of.way is d dicated on the plat to the public public right-of-way. 8.Payment to the City for the final plat r iew fee and fee for legal review and filing of the plat easements and covenant in the amount of $400.00. 9.Payment to the City for park ded· cation .e for the creation of one ( 1) n w lot in the amount of $4,900. OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE OLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Tamarack Hill Hennepin Coun Minnesota subject to the following conditions: 1.. rior to City releas of the plat for filin applicant shall provide evidenc _ of fee ownership of the property in a form acceptab e to the City Attorney, and applicant shall meet any other title requirements and requirements of Preliminary Plat approval as may be required by the City Attorne 2.Applicant shall provide all documents noted in this resolt tion in a format acceptabl to the c·ty A om y prior to release of the plat for filin and shall complete all condit · s to the satisfaction of . ity s aff. prior to release of the plat for filing. 3.Th afor saic plat shal_ b fled by the City of Orono with either the Hennep·n County Reco der's Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before February 14 2001 together with a certifi d o inal cop of this reso: ution and executed copies of the a m -nts and cov nants noted abo ei Page 2 of 4 ' ' » t >i! ' ^(A*? ■ ; i The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 14th day of August, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowiedged before me on this 14th day of August, 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 ,NW comar ot NW 1/4. S£ 1/4.^ S«c. 32. Twp. na K. 23 w. of 5th PM S 89*06* 20- Z 465 51 fin* of NW 1/4. SC 1/4. Section 32 Cost fin# of W#t1 890 f#4t ' * ^ of KW 1/4, SC 1/4. S#c. 32 g 04 f Wwt In* or NW (/«, SC 1/4. Soetien 32 W 8 Drolnogo #ai«n;4nt { SouWi fco ol Nortn 220 »««t Of NW 1/4. SC 1/4. Soe. 32 I orWnog* end uWly «»o»"4nti '•~8S? S 69*06' 20- C 890.16 Cost fin# of NW 1/4, SC 1/4, S#cUon 32 I I OUTLOT A . ^_________N a9*06 ’ 20* W 37960 ~ 4*»40»l^.^<0 LOT 160.00 « i Edg# of ••Uond 320 00 203.74^^^ WEST 80.00 .. *•. ^/i • /tdgo of w#Uond pr ■ LOT y \ 5» 8\ 98S.U 'I80*w 2sm. 3 m 8 in S 89*02’0e" C 1340.35 I s« eoirw of NW t/4. SC 1/4. S#ctio4« 32 SC corn#r of W SC 1/4, SooUon 32 .f 4-1 O 0) 60 CO fl4 1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 10,2000 k 8.#2589 Woodhill Country Club, 200 Woodhill Road—Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 4496 —Continued Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0 (Kelley removed himself from the discussion of and vote on item 8). *9. #2591 Gina Hansen, 583 Park Lane—Variance—Resolution No. 4497 Kelley moved, and Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4497 granting a Variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5(B) to allow a side yard setback of 3-feet where 10-feet is required to permit construction of a second story to the existing residence. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *10. #2592 Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt, 350 Stubbs Bay Road North Preliminary Plat—^Resolution No. 4498 Kelley moved, and Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4498 granting pk'eliminary approval of a plat at 350 Stubbs Bay Road North, owners John Vogt and Mike Hilhelink. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 11.#2595 Erotas Building Corporation for Sharon Tapani, 781 FerndaleRoad North—Conditional Use Permit—Resolution No. 4499 Bottenberg stated that the applicant has applied for a conditional use permit to allow plumbing in an accessory building that will function as a pool house. It will be located next to the pool and behind the existing residence. It will include a changing room vvath a sink, toilet, and shower. The applicant had nothing to add. Mayor Jabbour moved, and Peterson seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4499 granting a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3(Q) to allow plumbing in an accessory structure to include a toilet, sink, and shower. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Jabbour stated he had attended a mayor ’s meeting where they unanimously supported adding officers to the lake to better enable the sheriff to enforce water safety laws. The Council discussed the process for arresting a boater for Boating While 8 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JULY 10,2000 8.#2589 Woodhill Country Club, 200 Woodhill Road—Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 4490—Continued Mayor Jabbour stated he simply wanted to distinguish between the bam expansion application and the road use issue. Storch stated she has been ignored and abused by the City and the Club and has spoken to an attorney about a selective enforcement suit. She has been looking at homes in other cities because of the issue. She stated the City does not take her complaint seriously. Mayor Jabbour stated they would continue to do what they can to help both sides find a resolution to the issue. Storch stated the City was wTong to open the driveway in the first place. She said the City could expect a call from her lawyer and exited the Council Chambers. Sansevere asked Jackson if there was anything more they could do about traffic exiting on Woodhill Avenue. Jackson stated there is not. They have had a good response to the last newsletter. He stated they could not find the blue Omega Storch claims comes out of the drive at 3:15 every day. Short of hiring a police officer, he does not feel there is more they can do to enforce the mles. Jane Delaney of 1315 Woodhill Road stated that she has not seen City representatives monitoring the road traffic. She has literally stepped in front of cars coming out of the drive to stop them, and they have been driven by Club employees. She feels there should be a mechanical gate at the drive entrance to stop cars from exiting onto Woodhill Avenue. She stated she is not concerned about the Club adding on to the bam facility, except that it will increase traffic on Woodhill Avenue. She stated that when she has called the police, they claim they are unawzire of the ordinance and won ’t respond to her call. She stated that the laws regarding use of the drive have been in place for a year, people are violating the laws, and it is the City ’s job to enforce them. Sansevere stated that the Club is being proactive in their efforts to stop outgoing trciiTc from using the road. He stated that the road issue should not prevent the Club from receiving a conditional use permit for the bam expansion. Flint stated he has faith in Jackson to resolve the road issue. Peterson stated that she agreed the bam expan.'*on is a separate issue from the road issue. Flint moved, and Peterson seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4496 .v/ifsroving a Conditional Use Permit Amendment per Municipal Zoning Code Sect'i iV?8, Subdivision 3 to permit a 19-foot by 52-foot addition to the barn structjj fs md to permit sanitary sewer connection to the property for the portion of the property not w ithin the MUSA boundary. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 19,2000 dk.; (#2589 WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB, CONTINUED) wth the neighbors and try to resolve these issues and to discuss whether additional conditions are necessary. Jackson stated the Club would like to do these improvements prior to wintertime. Smith noted this application will go before the City Council as a failed motion. Hawn recommended the parties meet prior to this application appearing before the City Council to try to resolve these issues. Smith stated in her view by allowing this application to go before the City Council as a failed motion, the Planning Commission has not completed their job. Lindquist stated in his opinion the unresolved issues that have existed for over a year need to be resolved prior to this application proceeding on to the City Council. (#4) #2592 MIKE HILBELINK AND JOHN VOGT, 350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH - PROPOSED TWO LOT SUBDIVISION, 8:25 p.m. - 8:49 p.m. Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt, Applicants, were present. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Weinberger stated the Applicants are proposing a lot split of an existing parcel located at 350 Stubbs Bay Road North. This property is located within the RR-IB zoning district, with a two acre minimum, this site is located on the east side of Stubbs Bay Road, with the land to the west of Stubbs Bay road being located in the five acre minimum lot size district. The Applicants are proposing a front/back lot subdivision which requires greater zoning standards for properties that do not have immediate road access. Lot 2 would not have direct access to a road. This property does have adequate land area to make this subdivision work, with both lots having acreage that exceeds the required minimum standards. Weinberger stated one lot would consist of approximately four acres, with the other lot consisting of approximately 10 acres. Weinberger stated three acres are required for a lot that does not have direct access to a road. Weinberger stated Lot 1 wrill be approximately 2.73 acres dry buildable, with the wetlands not impacting upon the proposed building pads for either lot. The main issue with this application is the access to the two properties, with front/back subdivisions requiring that an outlot be created as an access outlot for a private driveway. Weinberger stated in this case there is an existing driveway, with the outlot being configured in such a way as to allow access to the back lot. This arrangement would require a shared driveway access. Weinberger stated it would be appropriate to increase the width of the outlot an additional 10 feet to the south to accommodate drainage, snow removal and screening from the building site on Lot 1. The submitted site plan indicates the outlet ’s southern boundary follows the existing driveway. PAGE 15 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 19, 2000 (#2592 MIKE HILBELINTC, CONTINUED) screening shall be required along the south side of the driveway to protect the building site and to act as a natural buffer between the driveway and Lot 1. Weinberger stated the septic inspector has reviewed the submitted septic plans, with all four septic sites as shown on the property conforming to all standards and would be suitable for the construction of a mound system. City Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plans subject to the changes to the access. Hilbelink stated they would like the 30 foot outlot to remain the same since another 10 feet will result in pushing the setback from the house further down the hill. Hilbelink stated the current driveway is a solid surface already and should be sufficient to serve the two homes. Hilbelink noted they have dropped off some information regarding the landscaping, noting the property currently has a significant number of trees which they wall attempt to save. Lindquist pointed out the trees and the area within the additional 10 feet will not change. Hilbelink stated the additional 10 feet would cause the house to be located further downhill. Lindquist stated in his opinion there is enough room to do that. Weinberger indicated the additional ten feet would not impact the septic sites. Weinberger stated Staff could review this at a later time. Vogt questioned how they can determine whether placement of the driveway should be if they are unsure where the building pads are for both lots. Vogt stated they could potentially plant trees where the driveway will go. Vogt inquired whether that could be something that is stipulated to and completed at the time the building permit is issued. Weinberger stated that could be an option. Weinberger stated Staff could review the location of the driveway and the planting of trees at a later time once a final determination is made on the location. Lindquist inquired on Lot 2 w hat will happen in the future if they should want to split that lot. Hilbelink stated they did look at another plan initially which would involve bringing a road and a 100 foot outlot and a 100 foot cul-de-sac. Hilbelink stated the way the lot was divided did not create the best lot and was rejected. Lindquist suggested having a 50 foot outlot in the event Lot 2 is subdivided in the future. Hawn stated the way it is currently proposed, it cannot be developed in the future. Lindquist commented the City has a number of driveways that are only 20, 30 feet in width that service six or seven houses because the properties have been further subdivided. PAGE 16 t' 4 L^. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 19,2000 («592 MIKE HILBELINK, CONTINUED) Hawn stated in her view the Planning Commission tvpically does not permit that. Hilbelink stated that would require the removal of the pine trees in that area. Lindquist stated the trees could remain but the area would just be platted as a 50 foot outlot in the event this lot is developed further in the future. Hilbelink stated they did not prefer that option and have elected to only subdivide the property into two lots. GafFron indicated the Planning Commission could request the property owners place a covenant on the property preventing it from being further developed in the future. Hilbelink stated he would have a problem with a covenant in the event the owner of Lot 1 in the future decided to subdivide. Lindquist stated he has a concern that someone in the future will want to subdivide this property further and will not have driveway access. Hawn indicated it would be difficult to subdivide the back lot under the current City Codes. Hilbelink pointed out that further subdivision of this property may impact the septic sites. There were no public comments regarding this application. Weinberger noted he has been contacted by a party interested in purchasing the entire piece of property. Hilbelink stated they have been in contact with that individual, noting the party did have the chance to make an offer on the property. Lindquist inquired whether they were okay with the additional 10 feet. Hilbelink stated that would be acceptable as long as it did not impact the septic sites. Weinberger noted a minimal amount of grading is required on this property since the driveway already e.xists. Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2592, John Vogt and Mike Hilbelink, 350 Stubbs Bay Road North, subject to the platting of a 40 foot outlot, the standard drainage and utility easements being dedicated, and the planting of additional landscaping along the driveway once the actual location of the building pads and driveway is determined. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PAGE 17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 19,2000 (MS) ##2594 JAMES R. JOHNSON, 2240 FOX STREET - PROPOSED TWO LOT SUBDIVISION, 8:50 p.m. — 9:04 p.m. James and Helen Johnson, Applicants, were present. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Bottenberg stated the Applicants are requesting preliminary plat approval for a two-lot subdivision of an 8.1 acre site located at 2240 Fo.x Street. The property is located in the two acre zone and will create one new building site. Bottenberg noted the lot division is a front/back lot split, with the back lot needing to be a minimum of three acres. Access to the back lot will be provided off Fo.\ Street via Outlot A. The driveway to the back lot is proposed to come off the existing driveway used by the house on the front lot. Both lots meet all requirements for subdivision without the need for variances. Bottenberg stated the septic inspector has reviewed the septic sites and has determined both sites meet all City and State standards. The existing septic sites located on Lot 2 are conforming systems and would not be impacted by the subdivision. Bottenberg stated Outlot A would be created as an access outlot for a private driveway to serve Lot 1 and Lot 2. Access outlets are required to be a minimum of 30 feet wide to accommodate drainage, snow removal and screening without encroaching on neighboring properties. Bottenberg indicated Outlot A is 109 feet wide, with no additional screening necessary. Bottenberg noted a flowage and conservation easement was dedicated over the wetlands in this area in 1977. A 50 foot corridor on the west side of the property was purposely not included in the easement at that time to allow for future driveway access to the future back lot. The Building Inspector granted the Applicant a permit in April, 2000, to continue the. driveway to the back lot. The City would require approval of a wetland filling variance and the .Applicant would be required to obtain approvals from each of the affected agencies with wetland jurisdiction. James and Helen Johnson had no comment. There were no public comments regarding this application. Hawn expressed a concern that the proposed driveway is going through DNR protected wetland, which may be setting a precedent. Hawn noted the City normally docs not allow people to fill protected wetland. Smith inquired whether the driveway could be relocated. Johnson indicated the location is based c : an easement given in 1977 for the driveway. Hawn inquired whether this was prior to the time the wetlands were protected and when this wetland was designated on the City maps. Gaffron stated the City did an inventory back in 1974 and 1975, with this wetland being included on the list at that time. Gaffron stated that in 1977, with the lot was split off, the City accepted PAGE 18 m I - ’4 ' • • ,K CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ________________ A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A PLAT AT 350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH -FILE NO. 2592 WHEREAS, Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt, having interest in property located at 350 Stubbs Bay Road North, on May 16,2000, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two lot residential plat of property legally described as: Attached as “Exhibit A”; and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono's zoning, platting and on-site septic codes, the Orono Plan*“l.ng Commission held a public hearing on June 19,2000, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; arid WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on July 10,2000, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of dry contiguous buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. 3. The property contains 7.32 dry acres, 6.91 wet acres for a 14.23 total acres. The proposed plat contains two lots each meeting or exceeding the minimum lot area requirements for front and back lot standards. 4.The subdivision is a front/back lot subdivision requiring the back lot (Lot 2) to have 150% of the lot area for the zoning district. 5.Lot 2 is 524' in width to the rear of the street setback line measured from the west property line and Lot I measures 361' in width. The code would require 200' of width. Page 1 of 7 ii'fiiiniii ■ miHinri III I iiiai I iiirinTIfiii ubim �i--. � CITY of ORONO c,,-.,� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �/I ll � NO. 4: cl 8 � existi1 g residence and dri eway are located on the property and ould remain as a result of the subdi is ion. The existin structures me t required se backs as defined in the Zoning Code. 7.Chris P nee On-Sit System 1 Ian :,er has revie\v d the s p ic reports and has appro ed the septic design indicatin� two conforming septic sites on each lot. ·OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either on or more of the findings no ed abo. e, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves of the preliminary pl t for Mik Hilbe ink and John Vogt for the property located at 350 Stubbs Bay Ro d North per the surve) ted 6-29-00 (Attached �Exhibit B ) by lark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc., subject to the follo ing conditions: Out ot A shall be platted 50' " ide rather than the 3 O' proposed to accommodate a r ad should one be requir d in the future to pro ide ace ss to additional lots without dir ct access to a ro d. Future use of Outlot as a road shall r qui re approval b · the Orono City CoL .,ci . 2.Outlot A shall b used for dri e\ a urpo es onl s rving Lots 1 and 2 as dra\ n on the pre iminary _ lans dated 6-29-00. 3.Standard drainage and utility easements s!1dll be d dicated on the final plat lo• along exterior prop rty lin s nnd s• along int rior pr p rty lin 4 Draina e eas ments sh II be ded·cated on the final plat and conservation d flowage easements shall be granted for all City of Orono protected wetlands as identified on ti e Wettan nventory Maps. 5.etlands on the property, not identifi don th etl d In entory f aps by the City of Orono but ich ar prot ct d und r C methods shall be subject to a protecti ,e co enant filed ch in o ti l f th affi cted prope� as an d isory to property owners that he \V d · s ubj ct C r lation or U.S. Arm. C rps of En 0ineers JUrisdicti n. 6.C t hall fi d in th ch in of i for ea h lot as an advisory to futut property 7 r that pnmary and second drainfield . ite e ist on th prop rtv nd ar protected. Lot 1 nd 2 shall both cc s utlot A an b · ubje t t a e 2 of 7 Dri \ a) aint nanc CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. '--....i4.--4 ..... 9 ...... · ...... 8-.. __ 7.Lots 1 and 2 shall both access Outlot A and be subject to a Driveway Mainten\nce Agreement to be recorded with the final plat. ·· 8.The westerly 33' lying w·thin the Stubbs Bay Road North right-of-way shall be dedicated on the plat to the public as a public right-of-way. The following ist of final submittals. must be subrrjtted to tl-ie Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" == 200'. Drawing to include: A Lot lin platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated �-29-00. B.Dedication of "drainage and utility easeme ' IO' wide long al perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. C.Naming of plat. 2.Legal documents require A.Title opinion addressed to the City. All o\\ners, mortgage holders or others with prop rty interest indicaied therein shall sign the plat and all other documents af ected by such interest. B.The app ·icant must provide cerf fied copies of all recorded easements curr�ntly affecting he property. C.Dedication of "dr::iina e and tility easements" 1 0' · de along all perimeter prop rty lin s and 5' each side of internal property lin s. D.C0ns rvat1 n and flo\ age easements shall be granted for all City of Orono protected etlands as identified on he W tland In entory Maps. Pag 3 of 7 • CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY C·OUNCIL No 4 4 (; ·,. • ► ,,, '. .... • • E.Protective cov nants over all wetlands subjec to WCA regulatio bu\ not dedicated on the final plat. F,. Covenant documents protecting drainfield sites. G.Drive ay Maintenance Agreen1ent ensuring Lots I and 2 access to properties and identifying obligation to property owners r ding maintenance of such drive ay. 3.Fees to be paid: Total due: $400.00• based on 2000 fee schedule A.L gal review and filing fees =-$400.00 B.•Park dedication fee to be determined upon City Assessor's valuation of fair market valu of 2 acre rural lot. /ark dedication fee payment is due upon the filing of the final plat and ass ciated documents. Pa 4 of7 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 4 9 8 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of July, 2000. ATTEST: /) Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of July, 2000, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee. Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. MARY ANN JOHNSON notary PU8UC • l«NNESOTA My CommWon Exp«u Jaa 31.2005 Notary PGblic Page 5 of7 r.• t .Exhibit A e “ 4 4 9 8 I' . legal description of premises i;> ■ ^ .1 That part of the Northwest Quorter of the Southeast Ouorter of Section 32. Township 1 18 North. Ronge 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridion. lying North of a line drown from o point on the West line of soid Norltmest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distent 695 feet North of the Southwest CO ir of said Northwest Ouorter of the Southeost Ouorter to a point on the Eost line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Ouorter distant 693 feet North of the Southeost corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, except the North 220 feet of the West 890 fee', .nereof f . ■t '1- Page 6 of 7 V "K m; v>!S§1 PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR MIKE HILBELINK IN THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 32-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY.-..MINNESOTA s arof'20* c 4iSJl ^ s \ M i/HiHUU I • / / St •::: 11: : • < ; / ■•; / . ■ / / . ■J: i•• .- A-! • /■• y-=UT v/j-i \ V' ,'t \L I ♦ yL * ---------------------------------—• 7^ 1...—•....‘-.r ••.. N-------r:iy< ^___S_1__• ^ j / // / / / / .-V K \N •• •• •• '.'l "■ \--A ^ \ Him] / !W\\i \ > \ \ \ \ .............................. **••• ***** *••••*. \ # ; : : *:i :: ; \ i • \ \* \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ | \ • \ y rw/"'" cr wpitt I «• 9m OmUf •» tmVm U. lit m^m, ■m at VM •» t« a«k ^ wt Mm • m 9m 9m «f arit Om%m 9m %md9mmt 9mmUr Ml ImI Mr* •! •• MMial tmtm «f lut ift tMir «f *« twial OmtIw to • «n «« (w« to* «f mM 91 9m iMBMto Owvtor Ml totl ito>to •* »• «■«*—* •< •« rM 0-»tor. Mtol to» H»* m to*l 4 »• •••« MO ImI 9m 4 tmZ^'LLrn •t ••«Mt** *1 •Mt. MOTC-«*«» 9mm Mf •I »• 99mm OiwrtM »r«»Mr. I* 9m toMOto» to Ml pmwmt to totov top •»* to to f«f«l MIA • mil AMCt ^ toVA, uaupto SUM mv hoM • mjii Acait Ml MAC tatCAio wr nooict UA cioMi amcmomi m m t 1^ » Application Date: 5/16/00 Completion Date: 5/16/00 Deadline: *7/15/00 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: July 5, 2000 ITEM NO.= 10 Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Zoning: #2592 John Vogt/Mike Hilbelink 350 Stubbs Bay Road North Class II Preliminary Subdivision RR-iB, One Family Rural Residential. 2 Acre Minimum lot size Application: Vogt/Hilbelink have proposed a front/back lot subdivision of a 14 acre parcel located at 350 Stubbs Bay Road North. The subject property is located in the RR-IB two acre zoning district. Lot 2, being defined as a back lot, requires 3 acres. The City of Orono adopted Ordinance No. 122, Second Series defining front and back lot standards for subdivisions which create a lot without direct access to a public or private road. List of Exhibits: A B C D Res )iii»ion Proposed Plan Planning Commission Minutes (May 15,2000) Plaiming Report Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision subject to the follov^ing conditions: 1. 2. 3. Outlot A shall be platted 50' wide rather than the 30 ’ proposed to accommodate a road should one be required in the future to provide access to additional lots without direct access to a road. Future use of Outlot A as a road shall require approval by the Orono City Council. Outlot A shall be used for driveway purposes only, serving Lots 1 and 2 as drawn on the preliminary plans dated 6-29-00. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat 10' along exterior property lines and 5' along interior property lines. 4. V' 5. 6. 7. Drainage easements shall be dedicated on the final plat and conservation and flowage easements shall be granted for all City of Orono proteciea wetlands as identified on the Wetland Inventory Maps. Wetlands on the property, but not identified on the Wetland Inventory Maps by the City of Orono, but which are protected under WCA methods shall be subject to a protective covenant filed in the chain of title of the affected property, as an advisory to property owners that the wetland is subject to "'C.\ regulation and/or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jurisdiction. Covenants shall be filed in the chain of title for each lot as an advisory to future property owners that a primary and secondary drainfield sites exist on the property and are protected. Lots 1 and 2 shall both access Outlet A and be subject to a Driveway Maintenance Agreement to be recorded with the final plat. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat based on the resolution attached COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To adopt or amend the attached resolution. A ,1 ■ It:*- A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A PLAT AT 350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH -FILE NO. 2592 WHEREAS, Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt, having interest in property located at 350 Stubbs Bay Road North, on September 26,1997, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two lot residential plat of property legally described as: Attached as “Exhibit A”; and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 ct. seq. and the City of Orono’s zoning, platting and on-site septic codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 19,2000, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on July 10,2000, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt noting the following findings of fact: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residendal Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres dry contiguous buildable land within each newly created lot. The property contains 7.32 dry acres, 6.91 wet acres for a 14.23 total acres. The proposed plat contains two lots each meeting or exceeding the minimum lot area requirements for front and back lot standards. The subdivision is a front/back lot subdivision requiring the back lot (Lot 2) to have 150% of the lot area for the zoning district. Lot 2 is 524 ’ in width to the rear of the street setback line measured from the west property line and Lot 1 measures 361* in width. The code w'ould require 200' of width. Page 1 of7 r 6.An existing residence and driveway are located on the property and would remain as a result of die subdivision. The existing structures meet required setbacks as defmed in the Zoning Code. 7.Chris Pence, On-Site Systems Manager, has reviewed the septic reports and has approved the septic design indicated two conforming septic sites on each lot. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves of the preliminary plat for Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt for the property located at 350 Stubbs Bay Road North per the survey dated 6-29-00 (Attached “Exhibit B”), by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc., subject to the follovving conditions: 1.Outlot A shall be platted 50' wide rather than the 30 ’ proposed to accommodate a road should one be required in the future to provide access to additional lots without direct access to a road. Future use of Outlot A as a road shall require approval by the Orono City Council. 2.Outlot A shall be used for driveway purposes only, serving Lots 1 and 2 as drawn on the preliminary plans dated 6-29-00. 3.Standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat 1 O' along exterior property lines and 5' along interior property lines. 4.Drainage easements shall be dedicated on the final plat and conservation and flowage easements shall be granted for all C'ry of Orono protected wetlands as identified on the Wetland Inventory Maps. 5.Wetlands on the property, but not identified on the Wetland Inventory Maps by the City of Orono, but which are protected under WCA methods shall be subject to a protective covenant filed in the chain of title of the affected property, as an advisory to property owners that the wetland is subject to WCA regulation and/or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jurisdiction. 6.Covenants shall be filed in the chain of title for each lot as an advisory to future property owners that a primary and secondary drainfield sites exist on the property and are protected. Page 2 of7 ................... ji n »• I. h (• • r h' 7.Lots 1 and 2 shall both access Outlot A and be subject to a Driveway Mainteifence Agreement to be recorded with the final plat. 8.The westerly 33' lying within the Stubbs Bay Road North right-of-way shall be dedicated on the plat to the public as a public right-of-way. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: A.Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated 6-29-00. B.Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" I O' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. C.Naming of plat. 2.Legal documents required: A.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B.The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C.Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. D.Conservation and flowage easements shall be granted for all City of Orono protected wetlands as identified on the Wetland Inventory Maps. Page 3 of 7 I 11 IfII III!t n II — E Protective covenants ove r all wetlands subject to WCA regulation, but not dedicated on the final plat. F.Covenant documents protecting drainfield sites. G.Driveway �vtain enance Agreement ellsuring Lots I and 2 access to properties and ·d n i 'ing obligation to property owners regarding maintenance of suchdriv way. A.Legal review and filing fees = $400.00 B.•Park dedication fe e to be determined upon City Assessor's valuation of fair market value of 2 acre rural lot. Park dedication fee payment 1s due upon the fi ing of the final plat and associated documents. Page 4 ·of7 r I ^. I. i- f'hi ■ %■' f- r ‘V ll- Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of July, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day of July, 2000, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 7 }Exhibit A e " #•*. \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES That port of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32. Township 118 North. Ronge 23 West of the 5th Principol Meridion, lying North of a line drown from o point on the West line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter dislont 693 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to o point on the East line of sold Northwest Quorter of the Southeost Quarter distant 693 feet North of the Southeost corner of sole Northwest Quorter of the Southeast Quarter, except the North 220 feet of the West 890 feet thereof Page 6 of 7 41 . vj.. V.I i !<'icI^PIn'C0W4TYr..MIWES0TA iS I ) I ■■•••. \\ i/Himni\ / '----------- \ r> ; !ii;an \ I ■••••••' (—1 ) /// .//M U/1 ggSfej:v:~ '1"" ;;>?-<s^J..- a .-t ..• .■■<Fy/.i/ /1 PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR Mike hilbelink IN THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. .32-118-23 s et*or 20* c 4IS5I rivv-s- ^ ^1 •j / I V.OSTIfr* V _A- :> •\ *. V....... '-:•••• ! !I :■ :;,.••• ' ‘ t'.; I .' j < n ••• • : : ! : Jsl : I i MSiUi :* *: \ \ * ••• T\ I : ; •. *.• • • • • • •mvW •«M.«*•irsirix.!-- ***^ VVrWrrrMl Qjgtr af •« ti i------- •avN' TT - ^ ^ tagmmrn •m%m mm* ttl M mm^ •• •• ImMrm* tw«a» «i mM Jrr^ ^ ^ iHPMrt OnvIv. «i*w« •• ••• m laal •• ■•M §•• »ttl las wtf 1^1 k«M cAf at •» rtM at i« #H wwm W4 »vf»« !• #■•• «ar MCA • lOtSt ACMI fSTJIaVCMt tiM Mf kpto - MJII MACS UtmMt tWPM AVt MUCAICO tf OMiMliAt* «MCM0i4 •l.*» flea, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR Mike, hilbelink IN THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 32-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY,-..MII^SOTA I s erorio* c 4«y5t ( 1 V v' ••••••* v^^'-V’y »! !v/ i\r\ ■•••... —.../' (/MT/A-y i*-----------• .‘ •’^~ '/ / ^i«......1,.1 _,j-----y V c •••••NX-;,. • I .\f‘V V ~ fc ;S ■‘ •••*\ *•••• Y4ajj) \x ;*’: *. \ \ '------*. ..... ................... *****••« ' ■••• •••::•••.>••.. '' ••••XX t •••••,: I I*, t ! i It; ! ••I *1: t ti : •• ; >• • •\ 1 . *•. • *• \ ' *•. X • *. ** *. \•. \ • •. *. •. \• %• *.*. : \ I •t >•••1 imW «l 9m SiMltaM* •< II. ii« <99^ ^ ^ r 91 9m UtMtmi Ow«w Ml ImI Mvft «l •• 91 9m MMwl tMvIv l» • «■ Im« »<• •< mM mmm9i 9m*0 Ml N«« M»1i| «• »• tw99mm<^t mmm» •* iMMil 9m%m, 9^9m 9m tm9k Mt Im4 « »• vm« Mt N«< PifttC ««r -••X•rsf 91 ■«t9 m f«f«l MCA • MlISI -:4- * •IV IM • MJtl AOCt MitCAiv tf onanftU (iwi i MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 19, 2000 C HawTt reconftHui :d the parties meet prior to this application appearing before the City Council to try to resolve these issu^ Smith stated in her view by allowing th [Ration to go before the City Council as a failed motion. the Planning Commission has not completed their job. Lindquist stated in his opinion the unresolved issues that have e.\i^cdT'«M^r a year need to be resolved prior to this application proceeding on to the City Council. (#4) «592 MIKE HILBELINK AND JOHN VOGT, 350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH - PROPOSED TWO LOT SUBDIVISION, 8:25 p.m. - 8:49 p.m. Mike Hilbclink and John Vogt, Applicants, were present. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted Weinberger stated the Applicants arc proposing a lot split of an existing parcel located at 3a0 Stubbs Bay Road North. This property is located within the RR-IB zoning district, with a two acre minimum, this site is located on the cast side of Stubbs Bay Road, with tlic land to the w est of Stubbs Bay road being located in the five acre minimum lot size district. The Applicants arc proposing a front/back lot subdivision which requires greater zoning standards for properties that do not have immediate road access. Lot 2 would not have direct access to a road. This property docs have adequate land area to make this subdivision work, with both lots having acreage that exceeds the required minimum standards. Weinberger stated one lot would consist of appro.ximatcly four acres, with the other lot consisting of approximately 10 acres. Weinberger stated three acres are required for a lot that docs not have direct access to a road. Weinberger stated Lot I will be approximately 2.73 acres dry buildablc. with the wetlands not impacting upon the proposed building pads for either lot. The main issue with this application is the access to the two properties, with front/back subdivisions requiring that an outlot be created as an PAGE 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 19,2000 X ' X-. I access outlet for\ private driveway. Weinberger stated in this ease there is an existing driveway, with the outlet being configured in such a way as to allow access to the back lot. This arrangement would require a shared driveway access. Weinberger stated it would be appropriate to increase the width of the outlot an additional 10 feel M to the south to accommodate drainage, snow removal and screening from the building site on Lot 1. The submitted site plan indicates the outlet’s southern boundary follows the existing driveway, screening shall be required along the south side of the driveway to protect the building site and to act as a natural buffer between die drivewav and Lor 1. Weinberger stated the septic inspector has reviewed the submitted septic plans, with all four septic sites as shown on the propcrt>‘ conforming to all standards and would be suitable for the construction of a mound svstem.m City Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plans subject to the changes to the access. Hilbclink slated they would like the 30 foot outlot to remain the same since another 10 feet will result in pushing the setback from the house further down the hill. Hilbclink stated the current driveway is a solid surface already and should be sufficient to serve the two homes. Hilbelink noted they have dropped off some information regarding the landscaping, noting the property currently has a significant number of trees which they will attempt to save. Lindquist pointed out the trees and the area within the additional 10 feet will not change. Hilbelink stated the additional 10 feet would cause the house to be located further downhill. Lindquist stated in his opinion there is enough room to do that. Weinberger indicated the additional ten feet would not impact the septic sites. Weinberger stated Staff could review this at a later time. Vogt questioned how they can determine whether placement of the driveway should be if they arc unsure where the building pads arc for both lots. Vogt stated they could potentially plant trees where PAGE 22 p MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 19, 2000 the driveway wiH.go. Vogt inquired whether that could be something that is stipulated to and completed at the time the building permit is issued. Weinberger stated that could be an option. Weinberger stated Staff could review the location of the driveway and the planting of trees at a later time once a final dctci mination is made on the ^ location. Lindquist inquired on Lot 2 what will happen in the future if they should w ant to split that lot. Hilbelink stated they did look at another plan initially which would involve bringing a road and a 100 foot outlot and a 100 foot cul-de-sac. Hilbelink stated the way the lot was divided did not create the best lot and was rejected. Lindquist sugg ested having a 50 foot outlot in the event Lot 2 is subdivided in the future. Hawn stated the way it is currently proposed, it cannot be developed in the future. Lindquist commented the City has a number of driveways that arc only 20. 30 feet in w idth that service si.\ or seven houses because the properties have been further subdivided. Hawa stated in her view the Planning Commission tvpically docs not permit that, Hilbelink stated that would require the removal of the pine trees in that area. Lindquist stated the trees could remain but the area would just be platted as a 50 foot outlot in the event this lot is developed further in the future. Hilbelink staled they did not prefer that option and have elected to only subdivide the property into two lots. Gaffron indicated the Planning Commission could request the property ow ners place a covenant on the property preventing it from being further developed in the future. Hilbelink stated he would have a problem with a covenant in the event the owner of Lot I in the future decided to subdivide. Lindquist stated he has a concern that someone in the future will want to subdivide this property PAGE 23 >' •'f s.: MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 19.2000 further and have driveway access. Hawn indicated it would be difficult to subdivide the back lot under the current Citv Codes. Hilbelink pointed out that further subdivision of this property may impact the septic sites. There were no public comments regarding this application. Weinberger noted he has been contacted by a party interested in purchasing the entire piece of property. Hilbelink stated they have been in contact with that individual, noting the party did have the chance to make an offer on the propcrt\-. Lindquist inquired whether they were okay with the additional 10 feet. Hilbelink stated that would be acceptable as long as it did not impact the septic sites. Weinberger noted a minimal amount of grading is required on this property since the driveway already exists. Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application U2592, John Vogt and Mike Hilbelink, 350 Stubbs Bay Road North, subject to the platting of a 40 foot outlot, the standard drainage and utility easements being dedicated, and the planting of additional landscaping along the driveway once the actual location of the building pads and driveway is determined. V'OTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (f^9tt^59A JAMES R. JOHNSON, 2240 FOX STREET - PROPOSED TWO LOT SUBDl VISIOi<??8:50 p.m. - 9:04 p.m. James and Helen Johnson, A^Ucants, was present. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit <yWublication were noted. •Bocienberg stated the Applicants arc rcqucsting"*prcnrmBii}i^plat approval for a two-lot subdivision of an 8.1 acre site located at 2240 Fox Street. The prop5h;^jj^ocatcd in the two acre zone and will create one new building site. Bottenberg noted the lot divisiorHi PAGE 24 ft TO: FROM: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Ron Moorse, City Administrator % Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner D DATE: RE: June 9,2000 •#2592 John Vogt/Mike Hilbelink 350 Stubbs Bay Road North Class II Preliminary Subdivision Public Hearing Zoning:RR-IB, One Family Rural Residential, 2 Acre Minimum lot size Application: Vogt/Hilbelink have proposed a lot split of an existing parcel located at 350 Stubbs Bay Road North. The applicants have proposed a front/back lot subdivision requiring greater zoning standards for Lot 2 which would not have direct access to a road. Please review Exhibit I, Ordinance 122, Second Series, defining standards for the creation and use of lots which do not abut a public or private road. Lbt of Exhibits A B C D E F G H I Application Site Survey/Proposed property lines Legal Description City of Orono Wetland Inventory Map Plat Map Zoning Map Septic Review by Chris Pence, On Site Systems Manager Property Owners Notification List Ordinance 122, Second Series - Front/Back Lot Standards Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 - Lot Standards for RR-IB zoning district Section 10.03, Subdivision 27 - Standards for the creation and use of lots winch do not abut a public or private road. *2592 John Vogt/Mike Hilbelink 350 Stubbs Bay Road Nonh Gau II Preliminaiy Subdivision JuM !9. 2000 page-1 fT m I Section 11.03, Definition 24. "Lot Area, Minimum" - Each lot shall contain the minimum area required for each proposed lot as prescribed in the Zoning Chapter of the City Code. In rural zones not served by sanitary sewer, each lot must contain a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land exclusive of wetlands, public and private rights-of-way. All rural lots must comply with the City's on-site septic system provisions of the City Code. Application Review Applicants propose a two lot subdivision of a 14.23 acre property owned by Albert Draves. The property is located on the east side of Stubbs Bay Road. The subject property is located in the 2 acre zoning district and is guided by the proposed Comprehensive Plan for rural residential use. The property is not located within the MUSA. An existing residence is located on proposed Lot 2. The new building site would front on Stubbs Bay Road. The applicants have not submitted a grading plan to indicate the location of the driveway to serve the new building site. Access would be available fi’om either the road or access outlot. Front/Back Lot Standards Back Lots are lots that do not front directly to a public or private road. Lot 2 is a back lot and would be required to meet 150% of lot standards for lots in the RR-IB district, except lot width which is only required to meet the zoning district standard. Lot Summaries:Total Acres Acres dry Lot Width Required Lot Width Proposed Loti 4.01 Ac.2.37 Ac.200’381.64 ’ Lot 2 * developed 10.22 Ac.4.95 Ac.200’524.85’ Total 14.23 Ac.7.32 Ac. Yard Requirements Front Lot Lot 1 Lot Area Front Yard Side Yard/Adj. to Outlot A Side Yard Rear Yard 2.00 Acres 50 feet 50 feet 30 feet 50 feet 1^2592 John Vogt/Mike Hilbclink 350 Stubbs Bay Road North Class II Preliminary Subdivision June 19, 2000 pa^2 m—I .naiiiiiiifioiiMBi •tt."fc••‘i-• Back Lot Lot 2 Lot Area Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 3.00 Acres 75 feet 45 feet 75 feet C-.' Both lots meet all requirements for subdivision. Outlet A ♦ Outlot A is created as an access outlot for a private driveway to serve Lot 2 and potentially Lot 1. The back lot would continue to access via the existing driveway. It would be appropriate to increase the width of the Outlot an additional 10' to the south to accommodate drainage, snow removal and screening from the building site on Lot 1. The site plan indicates the outlet’s southern boundary following the existing driveway. Screening shall be required along the south side of the driveway to protect the building site. Staff has reconunended to the applicant it would be appropriate to plant trees south of the driveway to form a natural buffer between the drive and Lot 1. Easements and Covenants 1. 2. 3. 4. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat 10' along exterior property lines and 5' along interior property lines. Drainage easements shall dedicated on the final plat and conservation and flowage easements shall be granted for all City of Orono protected wetlands. Orono protected wetlands are those indicated on the Wetlana Inventory Map attached as Exhibit D. Wetlands on the property, but not identified in the Wetland Inve torv Maps by the City of Orono, but which are under WCA methods shall be subject to a protective covenant filed in the chain of title of the affected property, as an advisory to property owner that said wetland is subject to WCA regulation and/or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jurisdiction. Covenants shall be filed on the chain of title for each lot as an advisory to future property owners that a primary and secondary drainfield site exist on the property and are protected. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plans and to proceed to the July 10,2000 City Council meeting for preliminary approval. #2592 John Vogt'Ntikc Hilbolink 350 Stubbs Bay Road North Class II Preliminary Subdivision JunM i9, 2000 pagf-3 Planning Commission Options for Action: 1 .Recommtad approval of the preliminary plan and forward to the Council. 2.Recommend denial, stating reasons. 3.Table, requesting further information and provide direction to the applicant. 4.Other Action. \ . Application # Date Received 'OO Amount Paid A CITY OF ORQNO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ^^ ^/n ^yiyf , Site address v3v57~*) A/»S P)/^V'0/\Cry/^ /nAl Property Identification Number (PID)V-=»?____________ Please check one - Property abstract or____torrens? Attach legal description to application.^ ^ Name A//<: f-1^06 7~ Address (3o6.Aye/u O/!.Phone (home)7 City ORpyjO __________Zip5535^Phone (work) 4Z7<^-6 33^ OW'NER (if different than applicant) Name A/hetU^________________________________ Address City__ .'=^ST> A'. ^7Z(.S6S_/^^ fr'O Phone (home) ORCTYIO , AH a J #Zip$33/^hone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) / 7^ 3 ^Acres Dry Land Cs,*7 f Acres Wet Land /v. ^3 Acres Total, all parcels X Residential; no. of units___/ Other (specify)_________ Present Zoning District R R PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes •Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) ^Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites / / Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per___Acres .32 /Jrre<, Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land 2c Residential ________Other (specify)_________ I •- V\o ...V •-i* f ■ •• 1 * •• ^ ^* . ' .J i'5 'Vc I 5im: </>!§ loIh PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR MIKE HILBELINK IN THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 32-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA• •• S B9W 20- t T 465.91 d ct M I -^S 89W 20- C 8 MT> i 890,11 •f f«»M ---------^i I ■ 0 T MJ M inr:f I I--•(/ >//."iuh/ ; r Ax '7* -V -------- B V^' /-----\ I'r--1.7*=^" jr I ).! ii '■— ________________ \ ..................... L--------------------------—i ' 4*1 itc. AIL. ACIJItAC :»*• w*^•«//#•> toil : AC. tOlAiV-. t.fSlAC OOf «•»«•« *4 ••« »•! •I I ,4 .* i.-“"at •• . •<*.«4 I I I •I I -A' f \ •no %V • «( fv'-rf -J- I N 89^r 08- W U4845 r V r.••I f ••f Ilf** !f •*«* • ^** •*m «w,’Jli' nO. •• •• LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : That part'of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeost Quorter of Section 32, Township 118 North. Ronqe 23 West of the 5th Principol Meridian, lyincj North of a line drown from a point on the West line of soid Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Ouortef distant 693 feet North of the Southwest comer or soid Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to o point on the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 693 feet North of the Southeast corner of said. Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, except the North 220 feet of the West 890 feet thereof. --996----- denotes iron marker denotes existing contour line, NOTE-taken from city mops Bearings shown ore based upon on assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the obove described property, the locotion of an existing house and building, and the proposed location of a proposed dividing line thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. T0TjH -/S./JiAC/ICf -//. 9Jt •• fjiccit0/A>^A040 f • v ’ • • % 1 fi P ,. ^’^-* •. \ •■•V. , ^ . U23 •/^* • •••• . .1 .' \ ’ . < *•• •• • '*• •V * •- - i:^ i '• -3 •mvA PTjp.t^ v-»»-*• '•= «-7. 5 -r . • ... ••. .m. ' ' •* ir.r.- :. ^' * \*i * ' \ '*' * ‘*1 ■-»» ►4.* A. ? '• •' . :a ‘V-a V ^ aV'V" ■ *v-i 1525 I'T' '.'v P<»iin-' ' •• . ' .1 • .: . *‘ •- 'r \ -.\ V V‘ V f\* —'.V/.(-,„_ .u-,*,-.. .>,«_-O^---- /isr 4 ''•■>•'Re> • • 'i E <[i) -7 F RR·1A CR·1B LR·1A 1 A f • ItIILn ■I L-. TO: FROM; DATE: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner CtOis Pence, On-Site Systems Manager June 2, 2000 SUBJECT;Septic Review for Application #2592, Mike Hilbelink Subdivision. The property in the proposed subdivision requires the use of individual sewage treatment systems. Soil borings and percolation tests were performed by Rusty Olson’s—Soil and Percolation Testing on May 15,2000 to identify primary and alternate drainheld sites on the existing lot and the new lot.. The septic system at 350 Stubbs Bay Road North (existing lot) has been dehned as non-compliant by the City of Orono due to the fact that the drainfield does not meet the three-foot separation requirement to the seasonal watertable. The septic system was recently inspected on September 16, 1999 by City Staff and found to be functioning adequately at that time. Two septic sites have been designated. Both septic areas appear to meet all the minimum standards set by the State and the City of Orono.. The proposed design for the new lot has been designed to show room for two five-bedroom mounds (primary and alternate sites). This design will not require any variances to the State or City code. The design meets all the minimum requirements of the State and City codes. Based on the above information, staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision. Prior to any building permits being issued for a residence on the new lot, the City will need a more complete design showing specific home location, septic tank location and pump requirements. The City requires the drainfield sites be fenced off prior to any grading or land alteration on these lots RUN DATE IS/OVRR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PACE 5 BATCH BR2 PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TANPAVER NANE/ADDR PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TANPAVER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 5B S2-116-2S 13 0003 004S0 STUBBS BAY RD N TODD H 0 DONNA H CAUSE TODD S DONNA CAUSE ABO STUBBS BAY RO LONC LAKE HN 55350 SO 32-116*23 13 0004 00440 STUBBS BAY RD N FREDERIC P RIEDEL FREDERIC P RIEBEL P 0 BOX 194 LONG LAKE HN 55356 3B 32-11B-23 24 0003 004B5 STUBBS BAY RD N R C JOCHIHS t S J JOCHINS ROBERT B STEPHANIE JOCHIHS 4B5 STUBBS BAY RD N LONC LAKE HN 55356 30 S2-11B-23 31 OOCl 003B5 STUBBS BAY RD N PAMELA F CRECORY PAMELA FROST CRECORY C/0 HOLLYBROOK I CO 706 2ND AYE S R400 MPLS HN £5402 3B 32-116-23 31 0003 00355 STUBBS BAY RD JEANETTE LOUISE HORSE JEANETTE LOUISE HORSE 355 STUBBS BAY RO N LONC LAKE HN 55356 3B 32-116-23 31 0005 03760 WATERTOWN RD CATHARINE A CRAM CATHARINE A CRAM 3760 WATERTOWN AS HAPLE PLAIN HN 55354 30 32-116-23 41 0001 00030 ADDRESS UNASSICNEO ROBERT T LUND ROBERT T LUNO 4100 50TH ST W 62100 EDINA MN 55424 36 32-116-23 42 0001 00400 STUBBS BAY RD N RICHARD N STUBBS RICHARD N STUBDS 400 STUBBS BAY RD N LONC LAKE HN 55356 36 32-116-23 42 0002 00350 STUBBS BAY RO N ALBERT W DRAVES JR 0 WIFE ALBERT W DRAVES JR 350 N STUBBS DAY RD LONC LAKE HN 55356 SO 32-110-23 42 0003 00200 STUBBS BAY RD N C J 6 O N BOLLIS CHRISTOPHER t CAIL BOLLIS 200 STUBBS BAY RD.N LONO LAKE HN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 502 00010 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AM ACCURATE AMO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDCE AND BELIEF DAT ooo LI a o /•*" 1 V' ^ OKDINANa: NO.second series an ORDINANCE TOCODE AND SUBDTlf^ON CODE^ ■NOT A^ A PUBLIC 6r PRIVATE RO.AD toe CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDADIS AS FOIXOWS: the CITi --- "'loc Bac-c" - A IOC cypicaUy aaparacod from VorX.'’s" jin "eascdciic back loc .a "eascdcric oa . • ^ Ur-Frooc" - A lot abuccmg a public or pnvaca road, placted for access to a back lot., . cod-Sect^oa 10.03 is ameaded by adding SECTION 2. Municipal Zoning Cod- Sect. Subdivision 27 which shall read as foUows.Sion 27 whicn snau I. Back lots L“'’i.-Sd S 5 of the Orono Subdivision Code; A. Dimensional standards for back lots shall be as foUows. 1 Lot area shaU be 150% of the zoning district requirement •*• • Lot width measured parcel “ at the front yud street yard setback line oc»meet the zotung setback line of a “°“‘=^“"^,^"t^,yidTfront yard for district width requiremect. ^ /dje narrow access oudot back lot wul be a yarn st^S ’'^t.^'e'tTck lots shall meet corridor ends and the lot te^- L^«“. ^„tote setback the lot width standard at ahom^e, line, and at the street yard setback Une. aM&u t V u r - Ordinance #154, Second Series (Adopted December 9, 1996) - An Ordinance Extending An Interim Moratorium On The Granting Of Building Permits, Land Subdivisions, Rezoning Applications, Conditional Or Special Use Permits, Variances Or Other Authority Relating To The Siting Of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities And Structures In All Zoning Districts In The City Of Orono Ordinance #156, Second Series (Adopted March 24, 1997) - An Ordinance Extending An Interim Moratorium On The Granting Of Building Permits, Land Subdivisions, Rezoning Applications, Conditional Or Special Use Permits, Variances Or Other Authority Relating To The Siting Of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities And Structures In All Zoning Districts In The City 0£0rono Ordinance #158, Second Series (Adopted May 12,1997) - An Ordinance Adopting An Interim Moratorium On The Granting Of Building Permits, Land Subdivisions, Rezoning Applications, Conditional Use Or Special Use Permits, Variances, Or Other Authority Relating To Adult Uses In All Commercial And Industrial Districts In The City Of Orono Ordinance #159, Second Series (Adopted May 12,1997) - An Ordinance Extending An Interim Moratorium On The Granting Of Building Permits, Land Subdivisions, Rezoning Applications, Conditional Or Special Use Permits, Variances Or Other Authority Relating To The Siting Of Wireless Telecommunication Facilities And Structures In All Zoning Districts In The City Of Orono For total accuracy the user should enquire of the Citv Administrative Offices as to ordinances not included. i~h I I ■■itfmihi II ....__________^. f • :• I B. C. yidTf lakcshore back loc shall met the zoomg disoicc lakeshore yard requircmcats. ^ ^ r ft-onf lots A front lot created as part of a Dimensional stand^ds for ^ zoning district area, width and froncAjack lot division s^aU ^ lot reouircmenc for that zoning district. Access requirements. 1. 3. 4. 5. , .h.ii he 30' Elinimum width, ana shaU be wideAcceas ouUots shaU be " removal and screeningerouih to accommodate drainage, snow temu “diom encroaching on neighboring properuea. In approving frontftack ^°“|j^*,^a^a?cTss'withL the both front iot and back lo creating an additional :rcS:^ Driveways within a back lot shall be located at least W from the side or rear lot lines of adjacent lots. No more than two residences may be served by a driveway located within an access oudoc. No access outlot may be platten outlets for e.xcept when the intent is to rcii sSndards. Creadon of a pubUc or private toad meetmg city D.Screening requirements. 1.Driveways consOTCted j^cre^n of the City, at screened by fencmg or vege yard of the front lot, so all points to the rear of vrit^headlii^ts into the side or rearas to eliminate intrusion of vehicle headlights mto yard of adjacent lots. f 1‘ K ' ._„rioa at the discreaoa oc me so as lo S,. mmiioD of vehicle headlightsinto the side or rear yards of adjacent lots. of the back lot shall be adequately screened by to"or vegetadon at the discreaoa of the City, so as to . .__r into the side or rear yards »,«—all requirements ol tne zoouig ^ reo^uirementsi 1. Acc-ssory stiuctures within a back lot shall be allowed no closer Smo a neighboring property’s side or rear yarn. , .e-nirfs shall not be allowed within the required street S7b" nofS the requued rear yard of a front lot Which abuts the street yard of a bade lot. No accessory structure shall be allowed within an access outlot. mf ••-—------- • • I ^Ar»inn 11 31 Subdivision 5 is herebySECTION 3. Orono Municipal Cede Seccon 1 . . deleted and the following language substituted in its place. n 11*-*- ---------- , or-r-cc rn lots and front/badc lot divisions.Subdivision 5. Double frontage lots, access to lo . A. of topography and orientation. B Access from any ancnal where driveway access from access exclusively from an arsenal ^’J several adjoining lots, the any arterial roadway may be . combined access drive Council may require that such lots be se ^ roadway. Where possible, in order to limit possible traffic bazar ou a requiring vehicles driveways shaU be designed and arranged ■ 3 as to avoid req to back into traffic on any arterial roadway. private road. Such ouUot shaU not adhere to either the back or froat lots. Ftootfback lot subdivis.ons snau the following standards:\ t.L 1.Applicability. iH a.Pront/back lot diviiions cay b= used whea existing ac-ea<^e is adequate to pro'/ice a frout lot and a back lot without requiring an ^ea variance when the area of the ouclot access corridor is excluded. b.FrontAjack lot divisions may be used for individual "lot£:c“ir.s noQVeaiecce to the developer ctaer than supported by uniouc sice faccocs. 4» A froatrttack lot division shall not be allowed when ^y fviftlng residence on a neighboring property lontuag *e p“pos!d access oudot is located nearer its ariected std^o to than a dUtance equivalent ■ to the zonmg nistnct required front yard depth. a. b. Dtonsional standards for bade Ion shaU be as follows: Lot area shaU be 150% of the zoning district requirement. Lot width measured parallel to the uont or sheet lot line at Afreet vard setback line of a lakeshore back lot. o^r at the rear of the front yard setback line of a nool^keshore back lot sh-Il meet the zoning district wid(^ a ^e sueet^rd or iiont yard for any back lot will be a vard starting where the narrow access 'I^^th^ot begins. Lakeshore back Iocs shaU meet the lot "mJdard at the shoreline, at the lakeshore setback line and at the street yard setback line. c.The depth of the required street yard or front 150% of the zoning district front yard requir d.The required side yard and ShaU be 150% of the zoning dismcc . Ttc required lakeshore yard of a lakeshore back lot snau meet the zoning district lakeshore yard requirements. IV1^ J. m •I cfondArds for front lots. A front lot created as part Dimension^ ?^^?Jsion shall meet all zoning district area, of a frontA)ack ^ ^j^^ept that the required side yard of width and ^ ^^cess outlot shall be equivalent to the Access requirements; a. b. c. d. ►i«f« <>ion he 30 ’ ininimum width, and shall be to acfo^odatc d«maga, suow removal and Krtening ^thoot encroaching on neighboring properaes. frnnr/back lot divisions, the City may require ^°ho^ frLt lot and back lot share a driveway access ^>h-n the -'cc-ss oudoc if Council determmes that :;;^dido:i acc«a to the existing STeet .'iU be a pc.en.tal safety hazard. Driveways widiin a back lot shdl be locawd at least W frL the side or rear lot lines o. adjacent lots. No more dtan rxo residences may be served by a driveway located within an access outlot. Standards. . nnH accessory structure standards. Screening requirements ^riesianed in a manner such that Frondback lot subdivisions staU „ jt^odards of (he screening requiremeno and Section 10.03, Subdivision 27 can be m . ^se” wXack “f XuX °wXh approval after January 1, 1994. SECTION 4. Atiood^ and p>tbUcato^pabUcadon. Pioneer and the Laker newspapers and shah become en 5. Counca of Oiooo. Minnesota oa this 13 day of December I ATTEST: KroW M. I^-CIO* published in the Laker/Pioneer newspapers the week of 12/27/93 •’3 ‘‘.o ^W- f ^ '•■ •-r^^ 1:,"^ . •" ' ' •. '•0.7 xatMMtu ■'-■'im? '.'iStt.'s .3; v\ • # ■t'-l \*-.V‘'/820 . V i^- ♦ ' j.' •,fe #?' ^ ■■^ #4f'V-'-'’ ;/ m >i:>v ?•:-:: •i« «.4 5 -^.yiir-,^1 V./' ■ ■ ’f -i- ^^;i4:a “ .... .7// « T.; '• V V'.,., \ ^ 2000 ...,-rUrtONO .A REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 14, 2000 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Scivices's Directors Report Ml Item Description: Request for Payment #3, 2000 Lift Stations Project We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Payment H'h, 2000 Lift Stations Project to Ford Construction Inc. in the amount of $56,726.30 JL 'BONE^TROO ROSENE ANDERLIK3 H 6516361311 08/09/00 09:03 0 :02/04 NO:167 .« ii:li! I^Bonestroo fiSRosene &CAndert0c6. |\j| Associates Infinttrf 4 Ardiilrtti Owner: City of Orono. 2750 Kelly Parkway. Orono, MN 55232 Date: August 8.2000 For Period: Ju!v 16.2000 to July 31.2000 Request No: Contractor FordConstrucBonCo. lnc..PO Box 667, Excelsior, MN 55331*0667 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT FERNDALE LIFT STATIONS AND HWY BRA PILE NO. 139-99-107 P. I* I :i*i iil : iiii;l SUMMARY 1 2 iv* 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Original Contract Amount Change Order • Addition Change Order • Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned Leas Retainage 5% Subtotal Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. S 9 I305,886.00 i-i •ti: I 305,886.00 1m 127.615.00 0.00 127.615.00 6,380.75:,r! 121.234.25’!!; 64.507.95: 56.726.30 ^ Recommended for Approval by; BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK A ASSOCIATES. INC Qa^ Approved by Contractor:) FOIW Cpi^RUCTIW^^jCj^x^ Approved by Owner: CITY OF ORONO f,1 ■t ■i! I-'' .1 I “i M Specified Contract Completton Date: October 31, 2000 Date: il u si. 'I ? •I 'BONESYROO ROSENE ANDERLIK3 ^ 6516361311 a No.Itfin Part 1 • Hwy 12 Relaif Lift Station 1 Highway 12 relief lift staion 2 Valve manhole, including meter 3 Flow control manhole, including weir plate 4 8 ” DIP sanitary sewer 5 8 ” PVC sanitary sewer 8 4" DIP forcemain 7 4” DIP bends 8 12 ” X 4" wet tap w/valve 9 Cut in 12* X 4* tee w/valve 10 SeedwAopsoil 11 Seed w/lopsoil 12 Class 5 aggregate base Total Part 1 • Highway 12 Relief Lift Station: Part 2 • West Femdale Lift Statione 13 Lift Station No. 2 rehabilitation incl. gravity manhole 14 Lift Station No. 3 rehabilitation 15 Lift Station No. 4 rehabilitation 16 Lift Station No. 5 rehabilitation 17 Gravity sewer MH 18 Connect to existing 2" PE FM 19 2"HOPErM 20 Core drill and install 2* FM into existing MH 432 21 4” or 6* PVC service pipe 22 Granular borrow 23 Class 5 aggregate base 24 Class 5 aggregate base, 100% crushed ilmerock 25 Bituminous base 26 Bituminous wear 27 SeedwAopsoil 28 Sodw/topsoil 29 Furnish and install Evergreen Tree (blue spruce and arborvitae) 6' high Total Part 2 - West Femdale Lift Stations; Total Part 1 • Highway 12 Relief Lift Station; Total Part 2 • West Femdale Lift Stations: Total Work Completed To Date 08/09/00 09:03 0 :03/0A N0:167 $41,200.00 $86,415.00 $41,200.00 $127,615.00 ••• !;i 1:1 I • Contract Unit Quantity Amount Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date LS 1 $74,000.00 0.95 $70,300.00 'i 1 LS 1 $8,200.00 0.90 $7,380.00 i as m LS 1 $4,000.00 1.00 $4,000.00 LS 1 $600.00 2.00 $1,200.00 -» 9*4 LF 10 $45.00 10.00 $450.00 LF 55 $23.00 55.00 $1,265.00 i 1 EA 4 $6|0.00 4.00 ' $320.00 t i.f LS 1 $1,500.00 1.00 $1,500.00 e .LS 1 $2,200.00 $0.00 ih* SY 100 $2.50 $0.00 SY 200 $2.50 $0.00 TN 30 $15.00 $0.00 .1 $86,415.00 sH K! LS 1 $121,641,00 0.11 $13,000.00 i: «6; LS 1 $23,000.00 0.40 $9,300.00 •1 1LS1$23,000.00 0.40 $9,300.00 LS 1 $25,000.00 0.38 $9,600.00 t i LS 1 $1,000.00 $0.00 * 1 •• i; EA 7 $500.00 $0.00 .'j LF 100 $10.00 $0.00 »• LS 1 $850.00 $0.00 4 ^ LF 60 $30.00 $0.00 ii TN 100 $8.00 $0.00 j f . i-TN 75 $14.00 $0.00 TN 15 $14.00 $0.00 . i.i > (i TN 30 $90.00 $0.00 TN 30 $96.00 $0.00 SY 200 $2.50 $0.00 SY 300 $2.50 $0.00 u •i EA 12 $200.00 $0.00 !•! .* h !•'ili* }! •Si ;ii •ii I ii !i! ♦.* is.!:l L-...-[■a&'iniBfrii 11' h is f' II. ........ *B0NESTR00 ROSENE ANDERLIK3 © 6516361311 08/09/00 09:03 0 :04/04 NO:167 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF ORONO BRA FILE NO. 139-99-107 CONTRACTOR FORD CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. CHANGE ORDERS No.Dat*Oaacription Amount Total Chanoe Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY No.From Payment Retalnage Complated 1 Start OS/12/00 26.489.90 1.394.21 27.884.10 2 OS/12/00 07/18/00 38.018.05 3.395.16 67,903.10 3 07/18/00 07/31/00 58.726.30 6.380.75 127.615.00 Material on Hand I *e* til 'i •«. i:; **• Total Payment to Date $121,234.25 Original Contract $305,886.00 Retalnage Pay No.3 6,380.75 Change Orders Total Anwunt Earned $127,615.00 Revised Contract $305,886.00 «:! •!!i ll! 1: i=l u 4i O' I •i1 f=i‘! Ar •}f r!-' .{ij it X ■i!i • "!•I•I i-1ir !«• •I'l •i.1.1 :1: ♦v; Li .4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION cm iMrit MEETING AUG 1 4 2000 DATE: Ai®K( ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Services's Directors Report Item Description: Request for Payment #1, Webber Hills Sanitary Sewer Project We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Payment #1, Webber Hills Sanitary Project to Earth Burners Inc. in the amount of $125,459.38 m I Bonestroo Rosene vS Anderlik& |\|| Associates Ingtnteri 4 A/chitcctt Owner City of Orono. 2750 Kelly Pkwy.. Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0065 Date:August 8. 2000 For Period:5/9/00 to 8/8/00 Request No:1 Contractor.Earth Burners Inc.. 5910 Fremont St. Duluth. MN 55807 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT WEBBER HILLS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS BRA FILE NO. 139-98-102 SUMMARY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Original Contract Amount Change Order - Addition Change Order - Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned Less Retainage 5% Subtotal Less Amount Paid Previously Liquidated damages - AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $ S 0.00 0.00 $ $ 5. S S $ S $ s Recommended for Approval by; BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLfK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved by Coiyractor EARTH BURNERS INC Approved by Owner: CITY OF ORONO Specified Contract Completion Date; September 1, 2000 Date: raviMtil 215.120 00 215.120.00 132.062.50 0.00 132.062.50 6.603.13 125.459.38 0.00 0.00 125.459 38 r-s-if.i aeaii iTTieri i—traiTimir-ri-^••-n •«. 1: r No.Hem Part 1 • Sanitary Sewer 1 1-1/2“ HOPE. SDR 11 trench or directional drill 2 1 -1/2“ HOPE, SDR 11 directional drilled 3 2“ HOPE. SDR 11 directional drilled 4 3“ HOPE. SDR 11 trench or directional drilled 5 3” HDPE. SDR 11 directional drilled 6 1-1/4" HDPE. SDR 11 trench or directional drilled 7 1-1/4" HDPE. service pipe SDR 11 directional drilled 8 1-1/4“ HDPE. service pipe SDR 11 trench or directional drilled 9 1-1/2" HDPE service pipe. SDR 11 trench or directional drilled 10 1-1/2" HDPE service pipe. SDR 11 directional drilled 11 1 -1/4" curb stop and box 12 1-1/2“ curb stop and box 13 Connect to existing gravity manhole 14 1 1/2" isolation valve 15 2" isolation valve 16 3" isolation valve 17 Insulate sanitary sewer. 2" thick 18 Air release MH 19 Flushing Connection 20 Termination flushing Connection 21 Clear and Grub Total Part 1 • Sanitary Sewer Part 2 • Restoration 22 Bituminous driveway restoration 23 Gravel driveway repair 24 Bituminous street patching 25 Silt fence, regular 26 Concrete driveway restoration 27 Remove and transplant tree-conferous 28 Remove and transplant tree-deciduous 29 Remove and transplant bushes 30 Sodding, lawn type 31 MnDOT Seed Mix 70A 32 Wood fiber blanket 33 Furnish and plant evergreen tree (blue spruce) 6‘ high 34 Furnish and plant shade tree (sugar maple) 4" diameter Total Part 2 - Restoration Total Part 1 • Sanitary Sewer Total Part 2 • Restoration Total Work Completed To Date Contract Unit Quantity Amount Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date LF 1350 14.00 1350 $18,900.00 LF 360 14.00 485 $6.790 00 LF 2300 13 50 2309 $31,171.50 LF 2300 14.50 2300 $33.350 00 LF 500 14.50 484 $7,018 00 LF 500 13.00 491 $6,38300 LF 750 13.00 100 $1,300 00 LF 360 13.00 $0.00 LF 20 20.00 $0.00 LF 180 13.00 $0.00 EA 36 925.00 10 $9,250.00 EA 4 950.00 $0.00 EA 1 2300.00 $0.00 EA 3 1600.00 3 $4,800.00 EA 2 1600.00 $0.00 EA 1 1750.00 1 $1,750.00 SY 30 2500 $0.00 EA 2 5300.00 1 $5,300.00 EA 4 1850.00 3 $5,550.00 EA 4 1900.00 $0.00 LS 1 1000.00 0.5 $500.00 $132,062.50 SY 150 5.00 $0.00 SY 50 1.00 $0.00 SY 300 10.00 $0.00 LF 500 1.00 $0.00 SF 300 1.00 $0.00 EA 5 30.00 $0.00 EA 5 30.00 $0.00 EA 10 1.00 $0.00 SY 8000 1.00 $0.00 AC 2 150.00 $0.00 SY 100 1.50 $0.00 EA 10 300.00 $0.00 EA 10 300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $132,062.50 $0.00 $132,062.50 •Illlll finiiii E1c«W rinii r;Mi rail! AUG \ 4 2000 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CLlY Vt-Vt1VJ'4U DATE: August 14, 2000 ITEM NO.: / CJ Department Approval: Administrator Revie,ved: Agenda Section: Name Gregory A. Gappa Engineer's Repon Title Director of Public Services Item Description: Request for Payment #,Z'Stubbs Bay Road Cul-de-Sac Project We have reviewed the information sub1nitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Payment #3 Stubbs Road Cul-df;!-Sac Project to Buffalo Biturrunous Inc. in the amount of $66,104.95 1/1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& Associates fnginttri 4 A/cmitcts Owner: City of Orono, 2750 Kelly Pkwy.. Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Date:August 8, 2000 For Period: 2/9/00 to 8/8/00 Request No:3 Contractor: Buffalo Bituminous Inc.. 2852 County Road 12 N„ Buffalo, MN 55313 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT STUBBS BAY ROAD CUL-DE-SAC BRA FILE NO. 139-99-103 lend Talo Original Contract Amount Change Order - Addition Change Order - Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned Less Retalnage 5% Subtotal Loss Amount Paid Prevty..ii»iy Liquidated damages - AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 0.00 0.00 121.074.75 121.074.75 85,581.90 0,C^ 85.581.90 4.279.10 81,302.81 15,197.86 0.00 66.104.95 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved by C^racton BUFFALO BFfUMINOUS INC Approved by Owner: CITY OF ORONO Specified Contract Completion Date: _______________June 1, 2000 Date: R«)uui*3 August 8. 2000 121.074.75 121.074.75 85J81.90 noo 85.581.90 4J279.10 81,302.81 15.197.86 0.00 66.104.95 *.'.y '"''••MCIL MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AU6 1 4 2000 DATE: Augufa4,^fo85®^® ITEM NO.: 11 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: '/.Public Services's Directors Report Item Description: Electric Service for the Highway 12 Lift Station Provision of electric service for the new Highway 12 relief sewer capacity lift station will require the installation of a new overhead transformer on the high voltage power line on the north side of Highway 12 and installation of an electric service under the highway to the lift station on the south side. NSP’s cost for this transformer installation is $3,873. The City is then responsible for installation of the electric service from the transformer to the lift station. We are working on obtaining quotations for the installation of the electric service line. The estimated costs for this work are $2,600 for directional boring of a conduit under Highway 12 plus $1,000 for the electric cable and connection. The City will obtain quotations and have the directional boring completed by one of the boring contractors working on other sewer projects in the City. The electric cable installation and connection can be completed by the electrician working on the lift station project. This will require a change order because the lift station contract was based on the contractor connecting to a new pad mounted transformer installed next to the lift station. The cost for NSP to install high voltage primary cable under Highway 12 and a pad-mounted transformer next to the lift station was $17,000, so decision to have an overhead transformer and low voltage electric service was made. Also, because of the temporary nature of the lift station this is a better option. We are recommending Council approval for NSP to install the transformer at this time, so they can complete their work. Council approval for the other items will need to be obtained later. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve installation of an overhead transformer for the new Highway 12 sanitary sewer lift station by NSP in the amount of $3,873. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL meeting AUG 1 4 2000 CITY OF OHONODATE: August 14, 2000 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: Update on Mooney Lake Outlet Agenda Section: Public Services's Directors Report At the June 28'^ 1999 meeting the Council discussed the "Draft Feasibility Study" for this project. The Council’s position, at this meeting, was that the project was feasible and necessary and should be funded by tlie Watershed District through their tax levy supported Capital Improvements Program. The draft report discussed possible assessment options for funding of this project. The Council was concerned about the viability of this approach because of assessment appeals, as proving benefits to assessed properties is difficult. A letter, dated July 1, 1999, was sent to the Watershed District stating Orono’s position on this project. In June of 2000, the Watershed District released a "Final Feasibility Study." And a copy of the City’s letter is included in this final report. The recommended option for providing a pumped outlet from the lake is option 1. This option includes a pumping station located on Doug Dayton’s property and pumping the flow into the North Ferndale Road storm sewer system. The report recommends allocating the project costs among the property owners within the Mooney Lake watershed based on the "equivalent runoff method" this method assigns project costs based on the proportionate volume of runoff from each community. This results in the following project cost split. Orono 4% Medina 15% Plymouth 81% On August 1“ a meeting was held with MCWD staff, one MCWD board member, Bonestroo Engineers, and Orono and Plymouth City staff in attendance. At this meeting, it was decided to have a survey of the extent of tree damage completed and included in the report before a decision on the project is made by the MCWD Board. The report recommends that if the project is financed using a cost allocation to the property owners that the Watershed District consider providing an option to spread the allocation costs to the property owners over a 5- 10 year period. This could be completed through an assessment process. It was the consensus of the City staff that if this method is selected, the process should be conducted by the Watershed District. The cities would not be interested in being responsible for administering the assessment process and levying assessments COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Discussion of Mooney Lake Outlet project h :■. *i'I ('■* I: ■. •r Final Report for ft K Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study Minnehaha Creek Watershed District June, 2000 File No. 633-99-100 13! Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk & Associates Engineers & Architects r ; >: ^ iBonestroo Rosene ^ ■ Anderlik & \ Associates Engineers & Architects Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderlik end Associetes. Inc. Is an Affirmative Acifon/Equal Opportunity Emproyer and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G Bcnestroo. PE. • Marvin L Sorvai?. PE • Cienn tf Cook. PE • Robert G Scnunicht. P£. • Jerry A. Bourdon. PE Senior Consultants: Robert W Rosene. PE. • Joseph C Anderlik. PE • Richard E Turner. PE • Susan M. Eberim, C PA Associate Principals* Howard A Sanford. PE • Keit.i A. Gordon. PE • Robert R. Pfefferte. PE • Richard W Foster. PE • David O Loskota. PE. • Rcter: C Russek, A.I A. • Mark A. Hanson. PE. • Michael T. Rautmann. PE. • Ted K.Fieid. PE. • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolfs. PE. • David A. Bonestroo. M B A. • Sidney P. a'llliamson. Ft. LS. • Agnes M Ring. M B A • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE Offices: St. Paul. St Cloud. Rochester and Wiiimar. MN • Milwaukee. Wl VP^bsIte: WWW bonestroo com Jane 15,2000 Ms. Glenda Spiotta Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MN 55331-9578 Re: Mooney Lak? Outlet Feasibility Study-Final Report Our File No. 633-99-100 Dear Glenda: Please find enclosed 15 copies of the final report for the Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility -. Study. The recommended project is physically feasible. Cost estimates and recommendations for financing/cost allocation are included in the report. Should the Board authorize construction of the project, we estimate 5-8 months will be required to design the project, secure easements, and complete construction. A decision regarding operational responsibilities for the lift station will also be needed from the Board. Wc would be pleased to discuss the report wth the Board or other interested parties. In the meantime, don’t hesitate to contact me at (651) 604-4783. Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Rich Brasch cc.Tom Peterson Ismael Martinez I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. iA. Thomas W. Peterson Date: May 30,2000 Reg. No. 16610 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study Table of Contents I.Introduction II.Background III.Evaluation of Options A.Route and Cost Analysis B.Hydraulic Considerations C.Other Considerations D.City Staff Input IV.Recommendations A.Recommended Option B.Recommended Cost - Sharing Fieures Figure 1 — Mooney Lake Drainage Area Figure 2 — Mooney Lake Outlet Options Figure 3 - Proposed Outlet, Lift Station, and Stormsevver Alignment Tables Table 1 - Approximate Project Cost Allocation Based on Equivalent Runoff Table 2 - Estimated Total Capital Cost Allocation Per Land Parcel Appendices Appendix A Page Nos. 1 1 1 1 7 8 8 8 8 11 2 4 9 12 13 Back of Report I.Introduction The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) directed that an Engineer ’s Report in conformance with Minnesota Statutes 103D.711, Subd. 2 be prepared to evaluate the cost and feasibility of installing an outlet for Mooney Lake (State Protected Water 27-134P). The MCWD "directive was issued in response to petitions requesting such a study from the cities of Orono and Plymouth. The study was to include the .ollowing elements. The preferred route and configuration for the outlet The estimated cost of the project The impact of outlet operation on the downstream conveyance system The benefits of the project II.Background Mooney Lake is a shallow lake (ma.ximum depth of less than 15 feet) with a surface area of approximately 118 acres. The lake has no natural surface outlet. Portions of the lake- lie within the communities of Plymouth, Medina, and Orono. The lake s current watershed (excluding the lake surface area itself) is approximately 500 acres, with 320 acres (64%) lying within Plymouth, 125 acres (25%) \vithin Medina, and 55 acres (11%) within Orono (Figure 1). Land use in those portions of the watershed within the cities of Medina and Orono is dominated by large lot residential development while Plymouth s portion of the watershed is primarily medium density residential. In 1976, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) assigned an ordinary high water level (OHW) of 988.0 to the lake. Water levels in Mooney Lake.fluctuate in . response to the annual balance between water lost through evaporation and infiltration and water gained from watershed runoff and direct precipitation on the lake surface. Records for water levels in the lake indicate the highest recorded level was 989.37 on May 26, 1996, while the lowest recorded level was 983.1 in 1961. Over the past 20-r years, the lake has been experiencing relatively high water levels. These high water elevations have been causing damage to trees, yards, and landscaping. Flood nsk to residential structures adjacent to the lake is low. The City of Pl>-mouth has surveyed the walkout elevations for the lowest residences adjacent to the lake (located on the lake s north side). The elevation of the lowest walkout was 992.85 or 3.48 feet above the highest historical water surface elevation recorded for the lake. III.Evaluation of Options A.Route and Cost Analysis Providing an outlet for Mooney Lake will require a lift station and pipe to convey discharge water to an existing drainage system where the water can flow by ^avitj to Lake Minnetonka. Six possible outlet route options were identified as a result of discussions with city staff from adjacent communities and a review of conditions in the field Tw o of the route options were eliminated after further Held investigations and Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study MOONEY LAKE DRAINAGE AREA m MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MOONEY LAKE OUTLET FEASIBILITY STUDY \633\633991O0\CA0\OWG\63399100WO1 .DWG 6/99 FIGURE 1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & |\J| Associates EnginMfS 4 Afcfiltects COMM. . >• X' m '■/ III % jiH I 4k 4.. discussions with city staff indicated they were not feasible. The approximate locations for the remaining four options are shown in Figure 2. A brief discussion of each option is presented below; Option 1 Description: The outlet route would be entirely within the City of Orono at a location approximately 750 feet west of the boundary with Plymouth. The outlet conveyance system would be a combination of force main and gravity pipe approximately 2,200 feet in length. As shown in Figure 2, the discharge pipe route would extend from the south central shoreline of Mooney Lake to County Road 6, then east to Femdale Road. The pipe w'ould connect to a recently constructed storm sewer catch basin on Femdale Road just south of County Road 6. A 12”-diameter pipe would need to be jacked under the highway. Discharge water would travel in storm sewer pipe within Femdale Road, then through several stormwater management wetlands southeast of Hadley Lake in Plymouth before reaching the City of Wayzata’s conveyance system. Advantages: •Discharge would be conveyed to a new storm sewer system capable of handling the additional flow and for which easements are already secured. •New easement costs may be low. The owner of the land across which the route traverses has indicated his willingness to grant an easement free of charge. (Note: The high end of the project cost estimate range assumes that permanent easements would need to be acquired along the entire route of the new force main/gravity pipe while the low end of the range assumes no easement costs would be incurred.) •The lift station could be placed in a secluded area away from residences and high traffic areas. •Tree loss would be minimal, since the route is mainly through open areas. •An access road may not be required. The property owrer has expressed a willingness to allow use of his driveway for maintenance purposes. (Note: The high end of the project cost estimate range assumes that a new access driveway would be needed, while the low end assumes the existing private driveway can be used at no cost.) Disadvantages: The elevation change is large (more than 40 feet), which requires a larger, more e.xpensive pump in the lift station. Three-phase power will be necessary for operation of the larger pump, which will require installation of a new line from County Road 6 to the lift station (approximately 800 feet). Pipe will have to be jacked under County Road 6 Estimated Cost:$190,000-5285,000 Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study r':—-v.^-• o *.• • •T.“ A • •« J* •• ••^v. • ___ ‘ / K V_— e t -i*. • • ».N ••.'■• i• *. :• • • • * •.* 1•. . . ''•i • '•.y N \• 1*1 •**' *I' ■ — t **• ••.v.r -..-Av MOir^V •rrrO*^* v^.‘ MOONEY LAKE OUTLET OPTIONS MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MOONEY LAKE OUTLET FEASIBILITY STUDY V 1 nr\\ A n\ -MiLr!\ A11CQ 1 H'/in 4/l 6/99 FIGURE 2 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers S Architects COMM. . Option 2 Description: This route is located approximately parallel to and several hundred feet east of the Plymouth-Orono boundary. The pipe would again be a combination of force main and gravity pipe about 1,300 feet in length with a north-south alignment from the south shoreline of Mooney Lake. The discharge point would be a small wetland on the north side of County Road 6 just east of Femdale Road. The discharge would then be carried in existing drainage swales and pipes to Hadley Lake. Advantages: •Installation of a pipe under County Road 6 may not be needed since a corrugated metal pipe under the road from the small wetland already exists. Disadvantages: 'fhe elevation change between the lake and the wetland is large, which will require a large, more expensive pump in the lift station. Easement costs are likely to be very high. Tree loss w'ould be moderate to significant, since the route between the lake and County Road 6 is wooded. The Mooney Lake discharge could exacerbate existing problems with erosion along the open charmel portion of the conveyance system south of County Road 6. There are currently no drainage easements covering a portion of the route south of Courity Road 6. Estimated Cost:$210,000-$250,000 Option 3 Description: This proposal would involve withdrawing water from the southeast bay of Mooney Lake and carrying the water in a combination of force main and gravity pipe for approximately 1,300 feet in an easterly direction to an existing catch basin at 18*** Avenue and Ranier Lane in Plymouth. Advantages: The discharge pipe would connect directly to an existing in-place storm sewer, so there would be no erosion problem at the outlet of the pipe from the lake. Approximately 50 percent of the length of the route lies within City- owned park property and existing easements, so easement costs could be reduced. The small elevation change (about 15 feet) would result in a smaller, lower cost lift station requiring only single phase power. Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Stu<fy Disadvantages: The detisity of residential development is somewhat higher than for Options 1 and 2; the lift station would be in a higher traffic area and providing an access road may be more difficult since Troy Lane is a private road. The west end of the route is wooded, so some tree loss is unavoidable. Pipe could be installed by directional boring to minimize tree loss, but this construction technique is more expensive than open cut. Construction would disturb about 300 feet of 18'*’ Avenue in Plymouth along with an adjacent concrete sidewalk. Easement costs are likely to be moderately high. Estimated Cost:SI80,000-5200,000 Option 4 Description: This proposal involves vsithdrawing water from the southern tip of the southeast bay of Mooney Lake. The w ater would be carried south under County Road 6, then east along the south ditch adjacent to County Road 6. Fhe withdrawii water would be discharged to Pinetree Pond (State protected water 27-822w). This option would involve installation of approximately 1,900 feet ol force main and gravity pipe. Advantages: Disadvantages: Easement costs are likely to be lower because most of the route is within existing Hennepin County right-of-way. There is little elevation change, which will minimize the size and cost of the lift station. The density of residential development is somewhat higher than for Options 1 and 2; lift station would be in a higher traffic area and providing an access driveway may be difficult. The route f'om the lake to County Road 6 is wooded and very steep at the lake. The pipe will have to be jacked under County Road 6, which is exoen.'Ive. Ea-en ent costs are likely to be moderately high. Estimated Cost:$210,000-5225,000 Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study B.Hydraulic Considerations ■*ater discharged from Mooney Lake will travel south through existing conveyance vstems in the City of Wa>-zata before it is eventually discharged to Lake Minnetonka. concern with the discharge of this pumped water is overburdening downstream .. : ancc systems. This potential is highest i-. the discharge occurs when the lam system is already being used to carry runoff from local drainages. f .ze the potential for overburdening downstream conveyance systems with the -y Lake discharge, pumpinf^ from the lake could be confined to off-peak conditions. For example, pumping could take place in early spring sfter snowmelt or in late tall when downstream facilities are at normal water level. In addition, a low pumping rate of one cubic foot per second (cfs) could be used to minimize short-term fluctuations in downstream water bodies as well as minimize the cost of the project. Water elevation records collected for Mooney Lake since 1995, observations of shoreline condition around the lake, and discussions wdth watershed district and city staff suggest that the water level in the lake could be set to fluctuate freely be^veen elevation 987 and 988.We estimate that if pumping is conducted beginning at elevation 988, pumping would be necessary every 3-5 years. The infrequent need for pumping is in part a function of the relatively small watershed of the lake compared to its surface area and the role that infiltration and evaporation appear to play in limiting lake level rises. .\ hydraulic modeling analysis was performed using HydroCAD (Version 5.01). The main objective of the analysis was to estimate lake level response to different pumping scenarios for a critical runoff event. The results of that analysis are as follows: •The runoff generated by a critical 10-day, 100-year precipitation event (10.8 inches of rainfall over a 10-day period) will increase storage in the lake by about 380 acre-feet. This increase in storage will raise the elevation of the lake by about three feet to an elevation of 990.9 from a starting elevation of 988. . . •At a pumping rate of 1 cfs, 60-70 days of pump operation would be required to lower the lake elevation by 1 foot. •Pumping from the lake at a rale of 1 cfs during the 10-day, 100-year critical event reduces the peak high water level of Mooney Lake by just O.l feet. As a result of the above information, we conclude the following with regard to operation of a lift station: •The water level in Mocney Lake can be set to fluctuate freely between the elevations of 887 and 888. •Pumping from the lake should be considered when the elevation of the lake reaches an elevation of 888. •A pumping rate of 1 cfs is recommended to minimize impacts to downstream w'ater bodies as well as to minimize the cost of the project. Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study Pumping should be conducted during off-peak periods between runoff events (such as after spring snowmelt or in the late fall), since pumping during a large runoff event will not appreciably reduce the peak water level in Mooney Lake. Pumping during off-peak conditions will reduce impacts on downstream conveyance systems. Pumping will likely be needed only every 3-5 years. C.Other Considerations The installation of an outlet in Mooney Lake will require a permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. MnDNR area hydrologist Ceil Strauss was contacted in March, 1999, to discuss permitting considerations. She outlined the following requirements: The final control elevation for Mooney Lake can be no lower than 1.5 feet below the OHW of 988. Setting the control water level at a higher elevation will be governed by flood risk considerations. MnDNR’s main concern will be to assure that the discharges from Mooney Lake will not cause flooding problems downstream. Dry weather pumping is a good strategy to avoid potential problems, but MnDNR will require an operating plan that specifies when and how the lift station would be operated, when pumping would cease, etc. MnDNR has no records of eurasian milfoil infestations in Mooney Lake, so screening of the intake would not be required. D.City Staff Input On April 2,1999, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District staff and staff met with city representatives from Plymouth, Medina, Orono, and Wayzata to review the information presented above. The purpose of the meeting was to solicit input from city staff in selecting z recommended outlet option for Mooney Lake. Meeting attendees generally supported Option 1. A draft report for review and comment was also distributed to the cities of Plymouth, Medina, Orono, and Wayzata in May, 2000. Comment letters received from the various cities are included in Appendix A. IV.Recommendations A.Recommended Option The following recommendations are made for the proposed Mooney Lake outlet. 1.Route. The route outlined in Option 1 is preferred and is shovvn in Figure 3. Inspite of its potentially higher cost, this route is recommended for the following reasons: Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study r PRIVATE •.DRIVEWAY. •V' I i I I * t':" \ -. v: *•*t V V .**-■. >-> - i- LL. '.VI 0 0 71 1 INLET PIPE ey ■f •3' \ ACCESS TO. 'LlFJSTATION •*• z .1 ■•^•%**• *.•..*•* : i • *• . •.*. • .• -r-5 ,•*.• . :»..• . /Sr T i'..... ■'■ EXTEt^lb;: 3“PNASE ■■■■• ^ . t: /N V -^ ‘:-o... , v V V • «i '•i ’V : I • ■ ' , • I \■■•••••"_'MANftOL€;:^^-• O, r—r* I njT’, | . •••■. / -.V •.• /'-71 y.V \ •••<• • i - • . •• • g. .*•-• : -•■. /*••’._c;ggg :. 7 r*.*. *.•.*. *.. •• • . •. I. .•••• •• •••. *••••• •---1 •j: *.vvT sLilJ v; y -1^* •,x ■■■■•■■•-•■■ ;■• • / I y.- -• /\ .•;t;'-^GdNNE^t:-. TO 'i Sti,ng;;catch ...•• . —*»■.* • PROPOSED OUTLET, LIFTSTATION, AND STORMSEWER ALIGNMENT J/| Bonestroo MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MOONEY LAKE OUTLET FEASIBILITY STUDY >/l C /Qd FIGURE 3 Rosene Anddrlik & Associates Engineers A Architects \e V f *E TQQ 1 1 rMAir*rnuM. . r. k- k - 2. 3. Only one private propert)' ovvner is affected by the construction of the lift station and pipe associated with this option. That land owner has indicated a strong willingness to cooperate in project construction and operation. Adverse environmental impacts such as tree loss are likely to be significantly less with this option than with any of the others. The lift station would be located in a relatively low traffic area, making it less susceptible to vandalism. Depending on how the final costs for the project are allocated, access and easement costs could be relatively low for thi- ■'ption. The route could be modified slightly depending on the desires of the owner of the property between Mooney Lake and Count>' Road 6. Operation. A pumping rate of 1 cfs is recommended for the lift station. The normal water level for Mooney Lake would be allowed to fluctuate between 987 and 988, with the expected high water level for the lO-day, 100-year event at 990.9. Pumping would be considered at a water elevation of 988 and would be conducted during off-peak conditions in early spring or late fall. An operating plan would be developed which ties operation of the lift station to the elevation of downstream water bodies in sensitive areas. The operating plan should also address who will operate the system. Costs. Preliminary cost estimates for this option are as follows: Construction: Lift station Pipe, manholes, jacking Access road Easements* Power Restoration Contingency" $70,000-580,000 S50,000-$60,000 50-520,000 SO-530,000 $20,000-525,000 55,000-510,000 $45,000-560,000 TOTAL 5190,000-5285,000 *Upper estimate assumes purchase of two easements from the property owner; one 1,100 feet long and 20 feet wide between the lakeshore and County Road 6 and another 1000 feet long and 10 feet wide along the north side of County Road 6. -Includes design, permitting, legal, and development of an operating plan for the lift station Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study . --- Annual Operation and i. ir.tenance: Electricity (60 days of pumping) Maintenance, inspection Parts, etc. Insurance, administration TOTAL $1,000 $750 $250 $400 S2,400/yr. 4.Timeline. The estimated timeline for design and construction of the project is as follows: Design (including securing easements) Construction 3-4 months 2-4 months Thus, the total time required from the date of authorization to proceed with design by the District to completion of project construction is estimated at 5 - 8 months. B.Recommended Cost-Sharing The District has requested a recommendation regarding the most appropriate method of funding the project among the various parties involved. Several options for allocating costs for the project were considered. Each is described briefly below. 1. 2. 3. 4. Watershed area. All or a portion of the cost of the pmject could be assigned to the three communities that share the lake based on the proportion of the total watershed area that lies within each community. Another option to allocate funding responsibility among the fhreeo5esi?bS^ the proportionate volume of runoff each coii^unity contributes to the lake for a standard runoff condition. The proportions are a function of both the size of the watershed and the runoff characteristics of the land use for the watershed within each community. Assessed valuation. This option would base the funding responsibility for the communities on the assessed value of the land within each city’s portion of the watershed. Watershed district funding. Under this scenario, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District would fund all or a portion of the project. It is recommended that the equivalent runoff method be used to allocate the costs of the project among residents of the Mooney Lake watershed w ithin the communities of Plymouth, Medina, and Orono. This recommendation is based on the following factors: Mooney Lake has no developed public access and is therefore not available for use by the public at large. The direct benefits that result from the project will affect the ripa.rian land owners only. The primary cause of the higher water levels in Mooney Lake has been the intensification of land use within the Mooney Lake watershed itself. Thus, the owners of developed property within the watershed .'ire contributing to the Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study p- problem condition in proportion to runoff volumes generated by their land. The method of allocating costs for the project should account for this variable. The proposed methoo .^cost allocation is based on the volume of runoff generated above an estimated baseline condition reflective of open, undeveloped land. Table 1 shows how application of this method allocates the total costs of the project among the watershed residents within each City: Table 1 - Approximate Project Cost Allocation Based on Equivalent Runoff City City Watershed Land Use Runoff Net Runoff Coeff.* Equivalent Cost Area (acres)Coeff.Proportion Share Plymouth 245 ■“SFR^0.27 .17 80.9%$153,700- ¥ m 75 Estate Res.0.17 .07 $230,600 • Medina 125 Estate Res.0.17 .07 15.1%$28,700- $43,000 Orono 52 Rural Res.0.14 .04 4.0%$7,600- 3 Estate Res.0.17 .07 $11,400 ToUds 500 100%$190,000- $285,000 f ' kr ' Net Runoff Coefficient = Runoff Coefficient for specified land use minus Runoff Coefficient for open undeveloped land (.10) ^ SFR = single family residential r Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study Table 2 shows the estimated cost per parcel within each land use type for each of the three cities. Table 2 - Estimated Total Capital Cost Allocation Per Land Parcel Watershed Area Estimated No. of Parcels* Cost Range per City (acres)Land Use Parcel' Plymouth 245 SFR 313 $432-5648 75 Estate Res.27 $683-5736 Medina 125 Estate Res.24 $1,195-51,792 Orono 52 Rural Res.1 $6,916-510,374 3 Estate Res.4 $152-5228 ‘Approximate number of parcels based on maps dated 1997 for Plymouth and 1999 for Orono and Medina. Includes parcels wholly or partially within delineated Mooney Lake watershed. ^Based on total capital project cost of $190,000 - $285,000 Should the project be constructed and financed using this method of cost allocation, it is recommended that the District consider providing an option to spread the allocated costs to respective residents of the Mooney Lake watershed over a 5-10 year period. Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Stutfy Lx..-,. KHri: TTTCTl ril 11 I mil liKl iliil VA irraniiR niiifraiTi] mm •1^(1 FHim rtiiirti nuvrtiAW CITY of ORONO July 1, 1999 Mr. Peter Cangialosi P.E. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior MN 55331-9578 Dear Peter; Subjec : Mooney Lake Outlet Street Address: 2750 Kelley ParkwayOrono, MN 55356 Municipal Offices Ma1Hn1 Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323'-0066 The Orono City Council discussed this issue at their June 28th Counci meeting. The Council's position is that this project is feasible and necessary and should be funded by the Watershed District tbroagh their tax supported Capital lmpro ements Program. The option of assessing the property owners ·thin the Mooney Lake ainage area was discussed, but the Council as concerned about the viability of this option. The most equi able method \Vould be to assess all of the properties in the drainage area based on hardcover and flow contribution becaus of the ide range of development d nsities in the area. Th viabili of this option is ques ionable because proving a benefit for the non-lakeshore residents would be ery difficult and there ould be many asses ment appeals. Assessing only benefining lakeshore o -ers is not equitable b cause they are not responsible for the entire problem. Thank you for your as istance in this matter. Pl as contact me at 612-249-4621 should you have any question 3Jc✓i(Jffrl ory A. Gappa" Director of Pub ic Services Copy: Ron Mo rs -ity A 1n1strator M yor Gabri_ l Jabbour and Orono Ci Counc 1 l emb rs Te ep one (952) 249-4600 • ax (952) 249-4616, www •. orono.mn.us � AUG.10.2000 12:00PM CITY OF PLYMOUTH ENG July 24, 2000 ''1s. Glenda Spiotta Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 2500 Shadywood Road Excel ior. ?v!N 5S331-9578 CITY OF PLYMOUTH- N0.687 ,.,__. SUBJECT: MOONEY LAKE OUTLET FEASmil.lTY STUDY -FINAL REPORT CITY PROJECT NO. 8019 Dear Glenda: I have 'been furnished a copy of the final report prepared by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Assoc., Inc. of the Mooney Lake Outlet Study. That study is incomplete and I would like to request a change. That study references and has attached letters received by the Watershed District of comments on the draft study by the community. 'The letter from the City of Plymouth is not included. In case the Watershed District has misplaced the letter from the ,City of Plymouth, enclosed is a copy of the September 3, 1999 letter which I submitted. As . ted in that previous letter, we have one major concern with the report. As indicated m the introduction on the report, one of the purposes of the study was to "au element with resp ct to benefits of the project'' The study does ,an excellent job in analymlg the options for an outlet. but nothing is addressed on what arc the benefits of an outlet. I beheve this is a critical item to be addressed before any fi.nanoing can be considered. I will be looking forward to discussing the fmal report with representatives on the Watershed at the August m ting. Sincerely, �� Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director or Pub . C works cc. ·ch Brasch BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK AND AS OC., INC. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN SSl 13 PLYMOUTH JI '1Jiat1tti/id !Pw, � A-. r3400 PL VMO TH BOULEV AR • PL VMOUTH, Ml N SOT A 55447-1482 • TELEPHO (612) 509-5000 I .. • -•• - • • .. FlJG.10. 2000 12: 00PM CITY c =-PLYMOUTH ENG N0.687 P.3/3 ( ......... September 3 , l 999 CITY OF PLVMOUTl-t L.Erle Evenson, District Administrator CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 2S0O Shadywood Road Excelsior. MN" 5S331-9578 SUBJECT: PROPOSED �10ONEY LAKE OUTLET CITY PROJECT NO. 8019 Dear ·Eric: This is a formal response to the watershed 1 s request for comments 011 the draft feasibility study for an outlet to Mooney Lake. I had previously discussed this study with Peter CangialoJi, one of your engineers who l understand is no longer with the watershed district. The feasibility study adequately addresses the o.ptions on installing an outlet and we concur that the route outlined in Option 1 would be the preferred outlet routing by Plymouth. One of the items that was to be addressed in the feasibility report, Jn accordance with the Bonestroo� Rosen� Anderli� and Assoc., Inc. proposal dated January 27, 1999, was "The Benefits of the Project". The draft feasibility study does not even comment on the benefits or need for the project. Before the report is finaliud, your consultant should address the need and benefits of the project. This is a key factor in determining whether any improvement is necessa.ry. You also requested comments on the four optiom for funding as listed in the repon. It � Plymo th's opinion that this project should be funded in accordance with the past practices of the watershed d1stti t for other projects. Two of the most rec•ent projects which we are familiar with · a the Gleason Lake Outlet and the Chain of Lakes project in the City of Minneapolis. This same method of funding should be used if it is determined there is a need for this project and it continues to move forward •hrough construction. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. irector of Pub ic W,orlcs ti .......... l400PLYMOU . 80 LE/A . P' '--"-"�"l'PIOJKC'rS\,ol ~ .•.J. : •!1 ,, I I} :id •Plll&:c 1.t.1 '-• •, I E O 5 447 · 14 2 • E ·e HO E l 1 ) 09-5000 ,ply City of Wayzata 600 Rice Street East Wayzata. MN 55391-1799 t\lay'lr: B�rry Petit Council t\lembers: Robtrt Ambrose Robyn Cook Andrew Humphrey June 3, 1999 �=����������=����===��� Joseph Mc:Carthy Cit} i\lanager: All n Orsen Mr. Peter Cangialosi, P.E. District Engineer JUN 4 1999 Minn.ehaha Creek Watershed District 2500 Shadywood Road Exec sior, MN. 55331 Re: Proposed Mooney ake Outlet Dear Mr. Cangialos·: R :,:: l '4. ... .... . ,; ......... ...,.,, . f •. .• I ·-;,..._J On behalf of the c·cy of ayzata, I offer the following comments regarding the proposed final draft of the Mooney Lake Outlet Feasibility Study: 1.S nee the entire Lake lies outside the bo daries of the City of Wayzata there .... should be no cost to the citizens. of the City of Wayzata. .. 2.We request you have your Engineer demonstrate t the City of Wayzata·that the project will have no adverse effects on the City of \Vayzata'_s Wate(shed. If you have any questions regarding any of this information, please feel free to contact me at your conveni nee at 473-0234. Sincere y, '?f· Teny Schwalbe ProJect Coordinator hi)n : 6 I 2 73 0 3 F · : 6l2-4Q.i .. S3 l8 e mail: c· home p _ e: I-• ' n ► CITY OF.ME diha .'if : •■ % 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN 55340 MAY 2 6 •- ^ May 25. 1999 cv.. •Pi L. Peter Cangialo^i District Engineer Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior. MN 5533-0682 RE: Proposed Mooney Lake Outlet Mr. Cangialosi, If the outlet project for Mooney Lake is to proceed, funding of the project will ultimately decide it’s fate. The City of Medina would like three options explored: 1.Hard surface within each city affecting Mooney Lake, Plymouth. Medina and Orono. Percentage of hardcover in each city to pay for equal percentage of the project cost. . * * ' 2.Number of homes and or parcels in each city within Mooney Lake drainage area. 3.Do nothing If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call at 473-4643. Sincerely, CITY OF MEDINA 1 Planning and Zoning Administrator cc: Mayor John Ferris Councilmembers Phil Ziellov/ and John Hamilton Administration • Planning and Zoning • Public Works Phone: 473-4643 • Fa*: 473-9359 Public Safety Phone; 473-9209 • Fe>; 473-6939 L r 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION »*cetING AUG 1 4 2000 DATE: Augus<chV dWSaoNo ITEM NO.: /3 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Service Director’s Report Item Description: Approval of Crystal Bay Park Official Designation Since construction of the new City office complex and removal of the existing City buildings on the Crystal Bay site, the City has been developing a park on this property. This property has never been formally approved by the City Council as an official "City Park" The attached map shows the park location. The parcel identification numbers and legal descriptions are listed below. Property Identification Number Legal Description 10-117-31-0024 10-117-31-0025 10-117-31-0026 10-117-31-0027 10-117-31-0097 10-117-31-0101 Lot 3 Block 1, Crystal Bay Minnetonka Addition Lot 4 Block 1, Crystal Bay Minnetonka Addition Lot 5 Block 1, Crystal Bay Minnetonka Addition Lot 6 Block 1, Crystal Bay Minnetonka Addition Unplatted, Metes and Bounds Description Lots 1,2,3 Block 1, Markville Addition We are recommending Council approval of the designation of the former City Hall and Public Work’s Site, on South Brown Road, to the City’s Park system to be named "Crystal Bay Park" COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the designation of the former City Hall and Public Work’s Site, as described in the listed legal descriptions, to the City’s Park system to be named "Crystal Bay Park" Property Identification Number Legal Description 10-117-31-0024 10-117-31-0025 10-117-31-0026 10-117-31-0027 10-117-31-0097 10-117-31-0101 Lot 3 Block 1, Crystal Bay Minnetonka Addition Lot 4 Block 1, Crystal Bay Minnetonka Addition Lot 5 Block 1, Crystal Bay Minnetonka Addition Lot 6 Block 1, Crystal Bay Minnetonka Addition Unplatted, Metes and Bounds Description Lots 1,2,3 Block 1, Markville Addition Sl/i SIC 10 RX3U/ CRYSTAL AV PAI^In" ^TT • • • *5 : : 14 I7S *5 .•i 31 WTXr 5 !fl ^ mj . l; a *' /s 140 . l«v *s •.'«0 X s ” / a ^ 1 4.0 • ’* ^ ? ’• K N s *< ». p a f »»! a f If > 10 '^Q R [T m\r.-^ ! 5 a41 ? ® 1 4 140av (H) j 14.0 <0 .*'140 1 (72) V f 14.0 T X S’ IS/ (??) Wif -//V . Qiv^a >ojki •at Tc This pc:h wXC #V U[^iN£TC^<<A AV£______________^ 5^r« ®Ss. V 2 2.><*)'"* isT.ei i ri7) ■?J7 •s/^TXrTcS.'I.I rm mm ipr^8— o ( ?5^ • CRYSTA ?' j LOT J A I'i______ # R?.0S?£C: Avg mPXS!^f:fy i -mi P(50)i ^ • / IJ -------- -3L- / k REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 14, 2000 ITEM NO.: /^j Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Services's Directors Report Item Description: Crystal Bay Post Office Window Replacement The existing windows in the Crystal Bay Office are in poor shape and repair of these windows is difficult because of the age and poor condition. The existing windows are single pane non- insulated glass in aluminum frames and are not energy efficient. They will be replaced with new energy efficient windows. The 2000 Capital Improvement budget contains $5,500 for this project. Below is a list of quotations received for this window replacement. Wayzata Windows, Wayzata Minnesota $4,735 Damar Window and Glass, Savage, Minnesota $5,864 We are recommending Council approval of the quotation from Wayzata Windows in the amount of $4,735 for replacement of the windows in the Crystal Bay Post Office COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve replacement of Crystal Bay Post Office windows by Wayzata Windows Inc in the amount of $4,735 to funded from the 2000 Capital Improvement Budget. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION HUG 1 4 20W DATE: Au^li's! ^,'2^0?”° 15ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Lin Vee sJ/Vv Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Administrator's Report Title City Clerk Item Description: Appointment of2000 Pnmary Election Judges -Resolution Background State Statute 204B.21, Subd. 2 states that election judges for precincts in a municipality must be appointed by the governing body of the municipality. Recommendation It is stafl’" vecommendation that Council adopt the attached resolution listing the names of qualified persons who have indicated their willingness to serve as election judges at the Primary Election on September 12,2000. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the attached resolution appointing election judges for the September 12, 2000 Primary Election. I A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE PRIMARY ELECTION TO BE HELD SEPTEMBER 12,2000 BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Minnesota Election Laws 204B.21, Subd. 2, the following persons are appointed as election judges for the Primary Election to be held September 12,2000: Al Ackermann Jeaime Mabusth Carolyn Byers Ralph Miller Norma Jean Dickey Phyllis O’Malley Martha Diesen Jocelyn Roufs Barbara Ericson Paul Schueller Eleanor Ferril Julie Sherf Joan Fit2patrick Pat Spilseth Carol Frommelt Mary Stinson Inez Gantz Cherry Stubbs Angie Gilmore Marilyn Thome Susan Jellison Helen Toward John Larson Richard Wett Gale Landberg Marge Wett Lee Lathrop Wes Wolverton Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Miimesota, at a regular meeting held August 14,2000. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk .trif ABsbiaidBG m REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AU$ ] 4 DATE: August 9, 2000 ITEM NO : /jb Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Orono Area Sports Alliance Agreement > Resolution The Orono School District’s Community Education staff have been leading an effort to improve coordination, communication and planning across the various youth sports associations and cities in the School District. The result of this effort is the attached Orono Area Sports Alliance Agreement, which creates an organization with membership from the Orono School District, youth athletic associations, and the cities within the Orono School District. The purpose of the alliance is as follows: 1.To establish the means to facilitate the organized and coordinated dissemination of youth sports information to the public. 2.To promote high quality youth athletic programs by encouraging community youth athletic programs to adopt a common set of standards for youth sports. 3. 4. To encourage youth athletic programs to strive to achieve the national standards for youth sports, as outlined by the National Youth Sports Association. To work towards the certification and criminal background checks ofall coaches and staff of community youth athletic programs. In addition, the alliance can be a forum for coordinated efforts to identify and plan for youth sports facilities’ needs. Membership in the association requires the adoption of a resolution and signing the agreement. The resolution must include the designation of a representative to serve on the board. Although the agreement indicates Orono ’s membership to be through the “Orono Park District,” staff recommends the membership be in the name of the City. Staff also recommends the City representative on the board be the Public Services Director, with the City Administrator as alternate. A resolution approving the City of Orono ’s membership on the Orono Area Sports Alliance and authorizing the City Administrator to sign the Sports Alliance Agreement is attached for Council consideration. Request for Council Action continued Page 2 August 9,2000 Orono Area Sports Alliance Agreement - Resolution COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City’s membership on the Orono Area Sports Alliance, and designating the Public Services Director as the City’s representative on the Orono Area Sports Alliance, with the City Administrator as the alternate representative. •t {:ih.- il: I 1. 2. 3. 4. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY’S MEMBERSHIP IN THE ORONO AREA SPORTS ALLIANCE The Orono Area Sports Alliance (OASA) is being formed to improve communication, coordination and planning between the Orono School District, the youth sports associations, and the cities in the Orono School District. The City of Orono has been invited to participate in the OASA. There are substantial benefits to participating in an organization that brings together the key stakeholders involved in the provision of youth sports activities in the Orono School District. Membership in the OASA requires the designation of a representative from Orono to serve on the OASA Board of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby authorize the City’s membership in the Orono Area Sports Alliance, with the City’s Pubic Services Director and City Administrator designated as the City’s representative and alternate representative, respectively, on the Board of Directors; and does also authorize the City Administrator to sign the recreation agreement of the Orono Area Sports Alliance. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 14th day of August, 2000. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 1 of 1 fV V, ' ' ' .*' X V. • y ^ s .‘x. V.'f '1 .' inication, )ciations. er the key 1 District. 0 to serve Jicil does y’s Pubic alternate the City IT meeting J }\oRomfim m fPi MDANCDCUIU OOMHUNnYEDUCAnON OnecRM BWtNBCMSIllOtl AssdTANT camMun EbUCAIMN OKCIOI Orono Pubuc Schools • 705 OU> C rystal bay R oad N orth . RO. B ox 36 • Long Lake , Minnesota 55356-0036 April 5,2000Dear Park Commission / Mayor,As many of you are aware, Community Education staff, Orono Board ofEducation members, area athletic association representatives and local park board members have been meeting for a number of years. Our goals of sharing and coordinating information and working together to support all youth sports in our area have come a long way since those early meetings. There have been various city park commission members from our six cities who have attended these meetings. This year we have worked to formalize our group so that many of the good ideas that have been talked about can be realized (ie. Youth sports web page, coaches training, speakers, master calendar, long range facility planning, etc.) Enclosed is a copy of the newly written Orono Area Sports Alliance agreement. We are encouraging your park commission / city council to review this document and come to our next meeting on April 13*** to learn more. The Orono Board of Education representatives in our group feci very strongly about the positive message this Alliance sends to our community. They also feel that school district facility use policies should reward the organizations who are a part of this effort. Being the stewards of public facilities is a function that cities have in common with the school district. We believe that workmg to strengthen the organizations that offer youth sport opportumties is a proactive approach to providing for the safety of youth and addressing liability issues for those who manage public facilities. The work to form tlus Alliance also supports the Orono Healthy Communities / Healthy Youth asset building effort. We are encouraging your park commission / city council to join the Orono Area Sports Alliance and select a representative from your city who can be involved on the board. Organizations joining the Alliance should return a signed copy of the agreement prior to July IS***. We will give each orgamzation a copy with all signatures at our first “official” meeting of the Alliance in September. We would also appreciate knowing who from your organization would be willing to attend Alliance meetings so they can be added to our mailing list. Please call Melanie DeLuca (W# 449-8351) or Jack Veach (W# 972-2758 ext. 203) if you have questions about the agreement. Sincerely, Melanie DeLuca Director of Community Education 952-449-8350 AN EQUAL OPrORIUNtlY Emom RECREATION AGREEMENT OF ORONO AREA SPORTS ALLIANCE ARTICLE I. The parties to this Agreement are Independent Sch ool Distnct No. 278 (Orono School District (including Orono Community Education Sports)), Orono Baseball Association, a non-profit organization, Orono Softball Association, a non-profit organizatio , Orono Community Soccer, a non-profit organization Thunder Soccer, a non-pro:fit organization, Orono Youth Football, a non-profit organization, Orono Hockey Boosters, a non-profit organ·zation, the Park District ofLong Lake, the Park District of Orono, the Park District of Maple Plain, the Park .District of Medina, the Park District of Minne o uca Beach and the Park District of Independence. This Agreement i made pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Sections 471.15, et seq. ARTICLE II. NAME The name of the organization created by this Agreement is the Orono Area Sports A Hance (hereinafter "the Al iance '). AR· ICLE III. GENERAL PURPOSE ......... �................ The parties ha e formed th· s greement for e purpose of providing an organiza 10n to accompl·sh the following: (a)To establish a means to facilitate the organized and coordinated dissemin tion of you sports information to the public; (b)To promote high quality youth ath l ic programs by encourag·n ommuni y yo athletic program to d pt a common set of standard fo youth sports; (c To en,co e . ou th athlef c pro gr-� .... to trive to a h1eve t a o al Standards for Yo th po as outlin d the a ·o o ports .Assa •io· . ( d)To work towards the certification and criminal background checks of·J coaches and staff of community youth athletic programs. Section 3 .2 The organization fonn.ed by this Agreem nt shall not be used or operated for pecuniary gain, directly or indirect ly, by any Member Organization as defined in Section 5.3 or any Director. ART'ICLE IV. TERM Sectiqn 4.1. The initial term of this Agreement shall be from ......,__J_ul_y_l_S_, 2_0_0_0 ___ to ___ Jun_e_J_o,_2 _0_03 ____ , subject to tenninati on by the District as set forth h r · S ction 4,2 This Agreement may be renewed by the Alliance as set fonh in its by laws. ARTICLE V. MEMBERSHIP Section S. l Any non-profit youth sports organization or park district within the geographic area of Ind ependent School District No. 278 is eligible to be a member of the Allianc e. Section 5.2 The anticipated ·n ·tia l members of the Alliance . _c described in Article . .-.....----�5 ... 3 To become a "Member Organization' of .be All·ance each or anizat·on, ·ncludin each organization descri ed in Article I, must en er into this Agreemect by resolu ion of i governing bod an by execution of a copy of this Agr emen by llts prop r offic r The resoluti · authorizi g the executio• of • agreement must designate the first Director(s) for the Board. In addition, an executed copy of the Agreement must be filed with the Alliance. Section 5.4 Any organization eligible for membership under Section 5.1 may ipply to become a Member Organization by resolution of its governing body Section 5.5 An eligible organization which has applied to become a Member Organization after the effective date of this Agreement may be admitted upon the approval of two-thirds of the votes of the Board present and voting at any regular or special meeting. The Board may, in its bylaws, impose conditions upon admission of additional members. ARTICLE VI. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Section 6.1 The policy-making body of the Alliance is its Board of Directors. Section 6.2 The District shall appoint four (4) representatives to the Board of Directors. The District shall select one or more alternatives to carry out the duties of an absent Director. Section 6.3 All other parties to the Agreement are entitled to select one Director to serve on the Board and one alternate to carry out the duties of an absent Director. Section 6.4 Each Director is entitled to one vote. In the absence of a duly appointed Director, the designated alternate for that Member Organization may vote Section 6.5 A Director is appointed by resolution of the governing body of the member. A Director serves at the pleasure of the governing body and until a successor is appointed. Section 6.6 Removal of a Director will occur upon revocation of a Director’s appointment by an appointing Member Organization or upon a unanimous vote of the i r!-i i* lLL remaining members of the Board of Directors in attendance at a meeting of the Alliance at which revocation of appointment is proposed. Section 6.7 A quorum shall be required to hold a Board of Directors meeting. A quorum shall consist of a majority of the total number of Directors or their alternates at the time of the specific meeting. ARTICLE VII. EFFECTIVE DATE; ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS Section 7.1 This Agreement shall become effective on the date when the last of the executed agreements and authorizing resolutions of initial members listed in Article I of this Agreement has been filed as provided in Section 5.3 of this Agreement, Section 7.2 If one of more initial members listed in Article I of this Agreement vote not to become Member Organization(s), the Agreement shall become effective when the remaining initial members become Member Organizations as provided in Section 5.3 of this Agreement. Section 7.3 Within 30 days after the effective date of this Agreement, a representative of Independent School District No. 278 appointed in the authorizing resolution of the Orono Board of Education shall call the first meeting of the Board, which meeting shall be held no later than 60 days after the effective date of this Agreement. Section 7.4 The first meeting of the Board will be the organizational meeting of the Alliance. At the organizational meeting, the Board must elect from among the Directors a chair, a vice-chair, and a secretary. A Director may hold more than one office. f flection 7.5 At the organizational meeting, or as soon thereafter as it may reasonable be done, the Board shall adopt bylaws governing its procedures, including the time, place, notice for and frequency of its regular meetings, procedure for calling special meetings, and such other matters as it deems necessary. The Board may amend the bylaws from time to time. The Board shall meet at least four times each year and on such other dates as may be provided in its bylaws. The annual meeting will be held in the month of September unless otherwise provided in the bylaws. Section 7.6 The Board may create an executive committee and other committees, if it chooses to establish a procedure for doing so through its bylaws. The executive committees may be authorized to exercise specified powers of the Board of Directors between board meetings, subject to the limitations, if any, imposed upon it by the Board through its bylaws. Sgetion 7.7 All meetings of the Board shall be conducted as if the Open Meeting Law applied. Vra. OFFICERS <}g9tion 8.1 The officers of the Board are a chair, a vice-chair, and a secretary elected by the Board for a term of one year and until their respective successors are elected and qualify, at the annual meeting. New officers take office at the adjournment of the annual meeting at which they were elected. An officer must be a duly qualified and appointed Director. 5 3 Section 8.2 A vacancy in the office of chair, vice-chair, or secretary occurs for any of the reasons for which a vacancy in the office of Director occurs. Vacancies in tiiese offices are filled by the Board for the unexpired portion of the term. Section 8.3 The chair presides at meetings of the Board. The vice-chair acts as chair in the absence, disqualification or disability of the chair. Section 8.4 The secretary is responsible for keeping a record of the proceedings of the Board and for such other duties as may be assigned to the secretary by the Board. Section 8.5 In its bylaws, the Board may establish such other offices, as it deems necessary, in addition to those set forth in this Article. DC.POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD Section 9.1 The powers and duties of the Board of Directors include the powers set forth in this Article. Section 9.2 It shall adopt policies and procedures consistent with its General Purpose set forth in Article III. Section 9.3 It shall resolve any conflicts or inconsistencies that may arise related to community youth athletic programs. Section 9.4 It may exercise any other power necessary and convenient to the implementation of its powers and duties under the provisions of this Agreement. Section 9.5 The Alliance shall not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, creed, national origin, color, religion, age, or disability and will conform to all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq. 6 X.FINANCIAL MATTERS Section 10.1 A Member Organization of the Alliance shall not be obligated by this Agreement to expend funds. XI.LIABILITY Section U. 1 Each Member Organization of the Alliance agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other Member Organizations and the results thereof. Section 11.2 Nothing in this agreement creates a duty by the Alliance or any Member Organization to supervise the actions of other Member Organizations Section 11.3 Each Member Organization of the Alliance agrees not to seek indemnification from the Allianc"; and agrees to waive and hold harmless the Alliance for any claim, liability, damage, costs, penalties, or fines for any action or inaction by the Alliance. Section 11.4 The Alliance agrees not to seek indemnification from Member Organizations and agrees to waive and hold harmless Member Organizations for any claim, liability, damage, costs, penalties, or fines for any action or inaction by the Member Organizations. XII.WITHDRAWAL A Member Organization may withdraw from this Agreement as of June 30 of any given year of the term of the Agreement, provided the Member Organization gives written notice to the Alliance of its intention to withdraw on or before the January 1 of that year. If such notice is timely provided the Member Organization shall no longer be a member of the Alliance as of the following June 30. I I ■IlMgtli■Mi IHW»ll I ^I ■I*I t*. • XIII.TERMINATION The District may terminate this Agreement as of June 30 of any given year of the term of the Agreement, provided the District gives written notice of its intention to terminate on or before the January 1 of that year. If such notice is timely provided the Agreement shall terminate as of the following June 30, XIV.SEVERABILITY If any term of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall to any extent be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each provision of this Agreement shall be valid and shall be enforceable to the extent permitted by law. XV.AMENDMENTS Any alterations, amendments, deletions or waivers of the pro .isions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by all parties to this Agreement. XVI.ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement represents the entire understanding and agreement between the parties hereto and this Agreement may not be altered, changed or amended, except by an instrument in writing, signed by the parties hereto. 8 >* . ;>4 l-r.3 WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the respective dates set forth below. Dated: Dated: Dated: Dated: Dated: Independent School District No. 278 By: Its: Orono Baseball Association By:. Its: ;*% i -i Orono Softball Association By:, Its: Orono Community Soccer By:, Its: Thunder Soccer By:. Its: [i Si» 3 Dated: Dated: Dated: Dated: Dated: Dated: Orono Youth Football By:, Its: Orono Hockey Boosters By:. Its: Independence Park District By:. Its: Long Lake Park District By:. Its: Maple Plain Park District By:. Its: Medina Park District By:. Its: I ^2^9 .«U .fjt '•-Aar. r-rilM^SlAi • Minnetonka Beach Park District Dated· ·------By: ___________ _ Its: ------------ Orono Park District Dated: ------By: ___________ _ Its: ------------ 11 • REQUE T OR COUNCIL ACTIO Department Approval:Admini trator Reviewed: Name Ron Moorse Tl le City Administrator �,, r v,-� trv,�vDA TE: August 9 2000 ITEMNO: ,, Age da Section: City Administrator's Report Item Descriptio:n: Resolution Providing for the Sale ofG n raJ O 1·gation Improvement Bonds The City has three sanitary sewer project that require fund·ng through a bond issue. These are the t Long Lake, Fox Ridge, and Webber i ls projects which are to be completed in 2000. The total amount of the bond issu is $925,000. It is recommended the Council adopt the attached resolution which calls for the competitive sale of bonds on August 28 2000. Attached is a breakdown from Carolyn Drude of Ehlers Associates, the City's bond consultan , setting out the estimated capitalization schedule for the bond issue. Motion to adopt the attach d resolut·on which c ls for the competitive sa . o~ bonds on Augu t 28 2000. RESOLUTION PROVIDING FO THE SALE OF 5925,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2000 A.WHEREA the City Council o the City o Orono Minneso has heretofor d termined that L is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $925 000 General Ob igation Improvement Bonds, Series 2000 (the "Bonds") to finance the co truction of various sewer improvements in the c·ty; and B.WHEREAS, the City -as retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc. ·n Roseville, Minnesota (''Ehlers"), as its ndependen fmancial advisor for the Bonds and is he ref ore authorized to solic.i proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60 Subdivision 2(9). NOW, THEREFORE, BE I RESOLVED by the City Council orc·ty of Orono, Minnesota, as follows: 2. 3. . A tho zation, Find gs. The City Council hereby authorizes hi rs to solicit propos ,s for the s e of the Bonds. M -eting; P oposa Openi · g. The City Counci hall meet on Au ust 28, 2000 or he plll])ose of considering sealed propo als for and award� ng the sale of the Bonds. O ci I Sta ent. In connection with said sal the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate w· th Ehl rs and participa m the preparaf on of an official ta me t for th Bonds and to e -ecute and deliv -r it on behalf of the City upon · s completion. Adopt d by 1ty oun il of th City of Orono 1nnesota at a regular m . tin e d this 1 th day o u ust 2000 b ot f __ aye and __ na . V Gabri Jabb ur r Pa 1 o •�U G 9 . 2000 3 43 M EHLERS & ASSOC. NO. 2974 P.3 CAPITALIZATION SCHEDULE City of Orono, Minnesota $925,000 General Oblig ation Improvement Bonds, Series 2000 Consuuctio n , eng ine ering contingency : East Lo ng Lake P ox Ridge Webbe r Hills Pro ject c os ts Cap it aliz ed intere st . 5 m o nths Costs o f issuance Fun ds Nee ded Plus allowance for discoun t biddin g Bond e S 167,540 233,086 466,141 $866,767 20,000 25,000 $911,76 7 13,233 $925,000 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^fJNCtL MBETINQ AUG 1 4 2m ciryohoho/vo DATE: August 9, 2000 ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: ^fBlne Ron Moorsc rule City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Stubbs Bay Water Quality Feasibility Study - Resolution As the City has developed its stormwater management plan, the area that has been identified as a priority for water quality improvements is the Stubbs Bay/Maxwell Bay area. This prioritization was confirmed by a presentation made by John Barton of H.:nnepin Parks regarding Lake Minnetonka water quality. Hennepin Parks conducts a broad program of water quality monitoring on Lake Minnetonka. Mr. Barton indicated the water quality monitoring showed a trend of significantly reduced water quality in Stubbs Bay and Maxwell Bay. Staff recently met with the executive director of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the MCWD’s consulting engineer to discuss the Stubbs Bay water quality issues. The MCWD will conduct some additional targeted water quality sampling at the two main inlets to Stubbs Bay to determine if the surface water entering the bay is contributing to the reduced water quality. A next step would be a feasibility study, which would identify potential solutions to the water quality problem. Because the water quality issues related to Stubbs Bay and Maxwell Bay have a regional scope and impact, it would be appropriate for the MCWD to conduct the feasibility study. Staff has prepared a resolution (attached) requesting that the MCWD include in its year 2001 budget a feasibility study related to water quality improvements on Stubbs Bay and Maxwell Bay. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution requesting the MCWD to include in its year 2001 budget a feasibility study regarding water quality improvement in Stubbs Bay and Maxwell Bay. i 2. 3. 4. 5. A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE MCWD TO CONDUCT A FEASIBILITY STUDY REGARDING WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR STUBBS BAY AND MAXWELL BAY 1.The City of Orono and the MCWD are both committed to protecting the water quality of Lake Minnetonka. The City’s surface water management plan identifies Stubbs Bay as a priority for water quality improvements. Water quality monitoring by Hennepin Parks shows a trend of a significant reduction in water quality in Stubbs Bay and Maxwell Bay. The reduced water quality in Stubbs Bay and Maxwell Bay has a regional scope and impact. The MCWD is in the process of preparing a capital improvement plan to assist it in planning future spending for water quality improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby request the MCWD to include in its capital improvement plan and 2001 budget a feasibility study regarding water quality improvements for Stubbs Bay and Maxwell Bay. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 14th day of August, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 1 of 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: August 9, 2000 ITEM NO: j ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department Proposed 2001 Budget Attachments: A.Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department Proposed 2001 Budget B.Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department Multi-Year Equipment Replacement Schedule The Long Lake Fire Commission, which is made up of representatives of Long Lake, Orono and Medina, met on Wednesday, August 2, 2000 to review the proposed 2001 Long Lake Fire Department budget and multi-year equipment replacement schedule. Operating Budget The proposed 2001 operating budget is $186,135. This is an increase of $11,980 or 6.9% over the year 2000 budget. The main cause of the increase is an increase in the contribution toward the firefighter pension plan from $28,000 to $34,000. Based on the cost allocation formula, Orono’s share of the operating budget is $134,632. Equipment Replacement Schedule The equipment replacement schedule includes the replacement of a tanker truck in 2001 at a cost of $110,000. Orono’s share of this cost is $77,000. Orono currently has a balance of $104,000 in its Long Lake Fire Equipment Replacement account. Recommendation The Long Lake Fire Commission approved the proposed 2001 operating budget and the proposed replacement of the tanker truck. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the proposed 2001 Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department budget, and the replacement of the tanker truck in 2001 at a cost of $110,000 ($77,000-0rono ’s share). rv f' I ■ I. II. CITY OF LONG LAKE AGENDA LONG LAKE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT BUDGET COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2, 2000 - 7:30 A.M. LONG LAKE CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER 2000 ACTIVITIES & ACHIEVEMENTS III.REVIEW OF 15 YEAR CAPITAL PLAN IV.PROPOSAL FOR 2001 MAJOR CAPITAL FUNDING 2001 BUDGET REVIEW QUESTIONS & COMMENTS f ' Vn.ADJOURN t i 1964 Park Avenue • Long Lake. Minnesoia 55356 • 612-473-6961 612-476-9622 (fax) • hup://www.ci.long-lake mn.us Fire Department FUND 101 DEPT 42280 Account DEPT 42281 Fire Fighting Fire Administration 101 -42280-101 101-42280-102 101-42280-103 101-42280-121 101-42280-122 101-42280-124 101-42280-131 101-42280-151 101-42280-201 101-42280-203 101-42280-208 101-42280-305 101-42280-311 101-42280-322 101-42280-331 101-42280-335 101-42280-361 101-42280-430 101-42280-433 101-42280-460 Full-Time Employees Regular Full-Time Employees Overtime Part-Time Employees PERA FICA Fire Pension Contributions Employer Paid Health Worker's Comp Insurance Prem Accessories (paper, pens, etc) Printed Forms Training and Instruction Medical and Dental Fees W.A.F.T.A Postage Travel Expenses Education General Liability Ins Miscellaneous (GENERAL) Dues and Subscriptions Awards and Recognitions Subtotal 101-42281-103 101-42281-122 101-42281-208 101-42281-212 101-42281-215 101-42281-216 101-42281-219 101-42281-221 101-42281-240 101-42281-241 101-42281-323 101-42281-328 101-42281-404 101-42281-430 Subtotal Part-Time Employees FICA Training and Instmction Motor Fuels Shop Supplies Chemicals and Chem Products Medical Supplies Equipment Parts Small Tools and Minor Equip Protective Gear/Uniforms Radio Units Pagers Repairs/Mainl Machinery/Equip Miscellaneous (GENERAL) 2000 2001 2001VS2000 Budget Budget $3,000.00 4,400.00 1,400.00 $0.00 - $11,865.00 12.460.00 595.00 $150.00 227.92 77.92 $1,140.00 1,289.79 149.79 $28,000.00 34.000.00 6,000.00 $0.00 327.00 327.00 $3,000.00 2.000.00 (1,000.00) $1,600.00 1,100.00 (500.00) $0.00 - $0.00 - $2,600.00 3,000.00 400.00 $1,450.00 1,500.00 50.00 $0.00 - $200.00 400.00 200.00 $0.00 - $10,000.00 11,700.00 1.700.00 $1,619.00 1,600.00 (19.00) $1,100.00 •1,100.00 - $500.00 1,000.00 500.00 $66,224.00 76.104.71 9,880.71 $37,000.00 37,000.00 - $2,831.00 2.830.50 (0.50) $11,500.00 12.000.00 500.00 $1,500.00 1.700.00 200.00 $0.00 - $1,400.00 1,200.00 (200.00) $1,500.00 1,500.00 - $7,600.00 8,000.00 400.00 $0.00 - $10,500.00 11,500.00 1.000.00 $3,800.00 3.800.00 - $2,400.00 2.400.00 - $7,000.00 7.200.00 200.00 $0.00 - $87,031.00 89,130.50 2,099.50 DEPT 42282 Fire Station Bldg I-:1 *. -1 101-42282-223 Building Repair Supplies $0.00 - 101-42282-321 Telephone $2,500.00 2,400.00 (100.00) 101-42282-362 Property Ins $0.00 - 101-42282-381 Electric Utilities $2,000.00 2,000.00 - 101-42282-383 Gas Utilities $1,900.00 2,000.00 100.00 101-42282-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings $1,300.00 1.300.00 - 101-42282-412 Building Rentals $13,200.00 13,200.00 - Subtotal $20,900.00 20,900.00 - Total FD 174,155.00 186,135.21 11,980.21 mm «'" jj ■.V,■m£^. '4f '• -f] Long Lake Fire Service Area Statistics - 2001 Long Lake Fire Dept Call Hours: Year Total Hours 1997 4195 1998 5104 1999 4034 3 Year Totals 13333 Annual Average 4444 1999 Call Percentage I 30% s I 1999 Fire Service Area Market Values (Million $) 820.94 1999 Fire Service Area Market Values Percental I 70% = I j200^udget^ercentag^ TOTAL 2873 $ 621.42 Orono Long Lake Medina Hours %Hours %Hours % 2762 65.84%1239 29.54%194 4.62% 3334 65.32%1417 27.76%353 6.92% 2524 62.57%1099 27.24%411 10.19% 8620 64.65%3755 28.16%958 7.19% 1252 f 319 64.65%28.16% I 19.40% I [845%| $ 124.90 $74.62 75.70%15.21% I 52.99%|r 10.65^ I 72.38^I 19.10%! 7.19% 2.16%! 9.09% I 6.36%| I 8.52%| ORONO LONG LAKE MEDINA |2001 Projected Budget |$ 186,000 I $134,632 I r$ 35,524 I I $ 15,84M t- ;-iT 1 964 Park Avenue Long Lake. MN 55356 longLake Volunteer Fa^Department July 16. 2000 Fire Commission Members Cities ofOrono, Long Lake and Medina Dear Sir or Madam: As outlined in the 15 year Major Capital plan, the Laig Lake Volintcer Ftre Department requests $110,000 for Major Capital in 2001. These finds will be used for Raflieemf Bt of Tanker 12 Tbaok you. in advance, for your ongoing support. Sincerely, Steve Persian Fire Chiefs Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department •i -:ril ‘ : ' ' ■Ils, ■' ^ m%. lAk# Volunim Fir* I>*|«i1inini ;/i*/oo ina)#.M Long lake Volunteer Fire Department Ma|or CapiUl OutUy rriwtty 1 Ihm fceeeowi ioKjpfart LUc Expuctency Tuk H TMI tetimeM KfcoouRtn^M rimd ----------nsn ----------1 or Add iillmi toKcpUc*Cost C'4MUMnta C^«4P1fTBL) itepAim finite 11 RcfttintTuikcr 11 1 Taakir aOOMH/ Mkm Medium/Mc«vy Raatiic liAftine ^uetlaiiK ApperaHw T«nker 9 PjiK^ur Utibty 11 n/M DrpertmcnlSULiuUfdi fifeaf Trudi 2000 $18/XX) MTF n/e f>fMirtinenl SlandAnle life on nick 2000 $6.0UU MEF U immI* Under Povvmd UruIrrBreUd 25 yeen 2001 $11C,CX» MKF Exietuvt Redkw Hrnorfdn County lUdki Cheni^ce 50yc«n 2002 $30;»0 MFF fU«Ml2 A rt Hdttf Hinliway Inddenl Commend Vehicle SaYciin 2003 $175i»0 Ml> Uffidmy A|Ct Cmn/mim Utrfulncm ‘lOYeerm 2004 S isomit Mlih IIk Mu ^SCBA A r *15Y«en 2005 $S04MI MU lunterll •Sefwy 25 Veeni 2007 $^400(000^ Miir CefMKiiy Rml'iwH AR*15ycei»2011 $SOJOttO MLF En|P>^ARd 30 Vein 2013 s 423X100 MFF pAOlinK Ulildy 11 A r «16 Yeeit 2016 %75,000 MFF tTnIel lieUmeted gJ5T T55530O1 s .v ‘ . i M* [ V ^ *'C V h Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department 2000 2001 s $ $ 24,000 110,000 $ $ 16,800 77,000 $ $ 5,280 24,200 $ $ 1,920 $ 8,800 $ 43.000 12.000 $ $ 67,000. 122,000 2DU2 $30,000 S 21,000 $6,600 $2,400 $80.000 $110.000 1 $175,000 $122,500 S 38,500 5 14,000 $13.000 $188.000 2001 $550,000 $245,000 s 77,000 $28,000 $33.000 $383,ono 2006 s 50,000 $35,000 $11,000 $4,000 $8,000 $58,000 2006 $6 •$-$-$-$ 2007 $100,000 $70,000 %22,000 $8,000 $-$100,000 :$-$•$-S • $-$•$m $$$m 2D10 $-$•$•%9 $m 2011 $50,000 $35,000 $11,000 $4,000 $$50.000 2012 $•$•$-i •9 • 2013 $425,000 $297,500 s 93,500 $34,000 $(4^,000 2014 $•5 -$-%m %5 • 2015 $-$-s -$m %$- 2016 s 75.000 $52,500 $16,500 $6,000 $$75,000 r Plan l uUlf l)1,389,000 i 972,3001 $305,580 1 i111,120 1 1$189,000 1 Is 1,578,000 t Y mt Mafor Capital (City)Expenae Allcxration Minor Capllal (5FF)Total Funding RcquircmcnlB Omno Long Lake Mcdiim Funding Rc*quireoicnta Funding ReqiiirenenU 67.000 mODO iio.nou 188.0IX) 58.000 100,000 50.000 425,000 75,000 mi. u il"-V'.?■ -. • •:■•. . jjjjm m^&m fc£M^vv:'Si F*,-- ■. ' .*■ •mm • . :; O" ^ ■■.:--nmm •;ii 1cm 1 4 Door p· k Up 3 5'wwaioblle Carini J u, . fled l.o,.._ I · Vo11aftk fltte �rtawnt 7/)o/00 10.AM Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department Minor Capital Outlay tility 1 Vehicle for Maior dent Support Mt-etinga and Coni ·re 'Vehick! 20Ye 2000 N/A N/ N/A N/A /A R por.we/ Winter d Summ�r r Winter l<e91IM>ll.lf Safer than urrent in r equipm nl Lake! MI KA pome Mo�dff · tety b(i t Mo .ab MTKA inci �nb/ s ty Mo� em=te11t .. rch and resc,�e ·SavinA, I/ fft)' ITnbd Anticipa ted pibd l!xrenw 15 ,, 10 YC?ars 2002 5Y IJfe of Vchid 2003 2001 2005 $ s $ s s 35,(XX) nab.i/2nd c.-..U/ FF lZ<n> Don tr/2nd C.ll/SFF/ONR 12,000 Donate/2nd Call/SFF/DNR bO,<XkJ nate/2nd 'all/SFF/DNR S.COI Dunah!/2ncl alJ/SrF 25,(XX) Donate/2nd U/SFF 119,0001 Coaunenta Ajumfuem^cd Fund Other ConiBicnte i/2nd Cidl/SFF te/2iul QOl/SFF/DNR le/2nd Cidl/SFF/DNR te/7M C.U/SFF/DNR K*/2nil C*U/SFT ite/2nd C*D/SFF REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIONDATE: August 9,2000ITEM NO: ^ ^AU8 1 4 200ft ICITY w^ uno/YQDepartment Approval:Name Ron MoorseTitle City Administrator Agenda Section:City Administrator'sReportAdministrator Reviewed: __________________________________________________________________^ Item Description: Appointment of Rachel Dodge to the Position of Administrative Support Assistant/Deputy City Clerk Staff has completed the selection process for the Administrative Support AssistantDeputy City Clerk position, and is recommending the appointment of Rachel Dodge to the position. Rachel brings ^nsiderable customer service experience, strong computer knowledge and experience, and a very friendly and positive manner to the position. It is recommended Rachel be appointed effective August 14,2000 at the pay rate of $ 15.68 per hour. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the appointment of Rachel Dodge to the portion of Administialive Support Assistantffleputy City Clerk at the pay rate of $15.68 per hour effective August 14,2000. r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CniJNCrL MEETINQ Aue I 4 2000 CITY Uf UhOlYg Date; July 31, 2000 Item No: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: Gary Cheswick Chief of Police Item Description: Part-Time/On-Call Community Service Officer Exhibits:None DISCUSSION With the resignation of Christopher Jensen, an opening existed for a part-time Community Service Officer. An advertisement was posted in local colleges and newspapers, providing four applications for the position. Interviews were conducted with Robert Cooper being selected as the best candidate. Mr. Cooper is a resident of Long Lake, a member of the Long Lake Fire Department, and has a strong interest in the position. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Request Robert Cooper be hired as a part-time Community Service Officer at the pay rate of $10.00 per hour with no benefits or PERA membership based on the $5100 maximum earnings stipulation, effective immediately. x:\appsNui)win60\wpdocs'iuc\counciI act !... --V COtfhir^n ik4^^l(yKI REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AU6 1 4 2000 DATE: August ?iT’^b8(f.'”®V0 ITEM NO: Ji ^ Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse #7 City Administrator's Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Scheduling of Budget Work Session A second budget work session is needed to finalize the general fund budget and tax levy, as well as to review the enterprise fund budgets and proposed capital expenditures. A suggested date and time is Monday, August 28 at 4:00 p.m. prior to the 7:00 p.m. Council meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to select a date and time for a budget work session.‘: fr «_ ! ' REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cn» iMoiL MEETING AUG 1 4 2000 CITY Oh OHONO DATE: August 9,2000 ITEM NO: ^3 Department Appi oval: Name Lin Vee Administrator Reviewed: Title City Clerk Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval There are no licenses. Agenda Section: Licenses ^UHiauaiil I t *CITY OF ORONO Paid Register 08/10/00 12:24 PM Page 1 AUG 1 4 2000 Check Employee Number Number Employee Name Pay Pay Group Period Description Check Amount cglTYOhOHOi Date Status 048006 469605135 PETERSON. BARBARA 8 MONTHLY $269.36 8/14/00 Outstanding 048007 477700023 MOORSE. RONALD J.8 BI-WEEKLY $277.05 8/14/00 Outstanding 048008 144500850 SANSEVERE. ROBERT K.8 MONTHLY $269.36 8/14/00 Outstanding 048009 468349059 FLINT. RICHARD 8 MONTHLY $269.36 8/14/00 Outstanding 048010 473846272 JABBOUR. GABRIEL E.8 MONTHLY $323.22 8/14/00 Outstanding 048011 476527186 KELLEY. CHARLES 8 MONTHLY $269.36 8/14/00 Outstanding W *►• I ♦ L ft. K $1,677.71 ‘ 4 CITY OF ORONO Check Summary Register Wednesday, July 26, 2000 Page 1 of 1 Name Check Date Check Amtm 10100 Primary Cash PaidChk# 061832 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 7/26/00 S7.459.00 PaidChk# 061833 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 7/26/00 $17.385 91 PaidChk# 061834 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 7/26/00 $300.00 PaidChk# 061835 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 7/26/00 $496.00 PaidChk# 061836 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT 7/26/00 $190.12 Paid Chk# 061837 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 7/26/00 $3,706.55 PaidChk# 061838 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 7/26/00 $1.'.97.68 PaidChk# 061839 PEBSCO/OBRA 7/26/00 $179 95 PaidChk# 061840 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 7/26/00 $2,718.00 PaidChk# 061841 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 7/26/00 $10,27839 PaidChk# 061842 UNITED WAY 7/26/00 $28.00 PaidChk# 061843 WISCONSIN SCTF 7/26/00 $184.62 Total Checks $44,824.22 M ' i ^Yiuxiaizt&LOi •Stiuatimsiiimm CITY OF ORONO 07/26/00 11 :38 AM Page 1 Check Register Pay Period Pb 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 Check # Employee Name 047886 JOHNSON. MARY ANN 047887 MOORSE, RONALD J. 047888 STURMAN. HEIDI N. 047889 VEE, LINDA S. 047890 KUEHN. THOMAS M. 047891 OLSON. RONALD J. 047892 PETTIT, SANDRA K. 047893 ANDERSON. BRUCE L. 047894 BOBZIEN. SUE A. 047895 BORIS. SCOTT W. 047896 BUDIG. STACIE M. 047897 CARLSON. MICHAEL B. 047898 CHESWICK. GARY B. 047899 CORNICK. JAMES L 047900 DEMBOUSKL JAY C. 047901 ERICKSON. KURT R 047902 FARNIOK. CORREY L 047903 FISCHENICH. DAN T. 047904 FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K 047905 JOHNSON. BRADLEY P. 047906 JOHNSON. JEFFREY 047907 MADSON. ADRIENNE M. 047908 MCNALLY. STEVEN A. 047909 MCNICHOLS. DAVID L 047910 MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES 047911 PERSELL. WILLIAM R. 047912 SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B. 047913 TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F. 047914 TOMCZYK. MARK W. 047915 WITTKE. ANTHONY A. 047916 HENDRICKS. RONALD J. 047917 BOTTENBERG. WENDY C. 047918 DAVIS. MARK L. 047919 GAFFRON. MICHAEL P. 047920 GAPPA. GREGORY A. 047921 MEYER. WILLIAM C. 047922 OMAN. LYLE E. 047923 PENCE. CHRISTOPHER M. 047924 WEINBERGER. PAUL E. 047925 BRINKHAUS. JOHN F. 047926 DEBAERE. DONALD L. 047927 GREGORY. JAMES D. 047928 HANSEN. STEVEN 047929 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G, 047930 OBRIEN. RANDY L 047931 PALMER. GREGORY A. 047932 RATHBUN. BARRY J. 047933 SKREEN. DALE S. Check Date 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26 /00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26 /00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26 /00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/0 0 7/26/00 7/26/00 intern 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26/00 7/26AK) Check Amount $629.30 $1,657.48 $645.59 $1,2 18.36 $1,390.75 $28.61 $441.48 $627.21 $675.27 $56.t4 $662.47 $379.42 $1,565.65 $1,103.91 $1,6 09.60 $1,291.27 $1,429.18 $1,313.33 $1,341.21 $1,525.43 $943.18 $659.09 $1,24539 $568.48 $1,600.32 $752.43 $1,422.94 $535.37 $1,299.24 $898.83 $563.14 $1,065.97 $1,126.55 $1,184.68 $1,653.05 $546.04 $92.00 $937.97 $1,260.62 $1,181.37 $879.94 $662.33 $1,252.52 $593.65 $615.02 $757.72 $996.35 . $775.10 Pay Period Report Total *v ?’.v ... Ip CITY OF ORONO Check Register 07/26/00 11:38 AM Page 2 Check i Employee Name Check Date Check Amount 15 047934 ABRAHAMSON, FRED W.7/26/00 $201.56 15 047935 BLAIR, JANISA.7/26/00 $139.07 15 047936 MCINTYRE. WILLIAM E.7/26/00 $220.46 15 047937 MOSER. HEATHER L.7/26. .0 $261.33 15 047938 MOSER, JENNIFER M.7/26/00 $263.78 15 047939 OAS, DANIEL O.7/26/00 $61.89 15 047940 PEICKERT, GARY J.7/26/00 $222.98 15 047941 PETERSON. JACK W.7/26/00 $356.24 15 047942 ROSS. JOHN A.7/26/00 $78.31 15 047943 STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD E.7/26/00 $1,240.87 15 047883 VOID 7/26/00 $0.00 15 047884 VOID 7/26/00 $0.00 15 047885 VOID 7/26/00 $0.00 15.1 047944 BIX. MILTON. H.7/26/00 $189.14 $48,897.08 tfM «orrrtT.w*ir.t-i«w>^ I CITY OF ORONO Paid Register 08/09/00 8:43 AM Page 1 Check Employee Number Number Employee Name Pay Pay Group Period Description Check Check Amount Date Status 047947 047948 047949 047950 047951 047952 047953 047954 047955 047956 047946 047957 047958 047959 047960 047961 047962 047963 047964 047965 047966 047967 047968 047969 047970 047971 047972 047973 047974 047975 047976 047977 047978 047979 047980 047981 047982 047983 047984 047985 047986 047987 047988 047989 047990 047945 477546587 477700023 475080784 468629488 472500574 472906755 469783642 471688060 474563339 473925115 468843008 472503991 469526026 475989721 472529007 475987748 468701868 470089708 471569863 397705677 468482592 468780454 480843542 334506281 471487919 470566529 474663296 470704904 476063489 469983292 472642666 521921879 469686562 398646989 474664219 470700901 468136521 471115918 475443862 471664106 474667812 477500666 468909535 476783251 469848107 JOHNSON. MARY ANN MOORSE, RONALD J. STURMAN, HEIDI N. VEE, LINDA S. KUEHN. THOMAS M. OLSON. RONALD J. PETTIT. SANDRA K. ANDERSON. BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A. BUDIG. STACIE M VOID CARLSON. MICHAEL B. CHESWICK. GARY B. CORNICK. JAMES L DEMBOUSKI, JAY C. ERICKSON. KURT R FARNIOK. CORREY L. FISCHENICH. DAN T. FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K. JOHNSON. BRADLEY P. JOHNSON. JEFFREY MADSON. ADRIENNE M. MCNALLY. STEVEN A. MCNICHOLS. DAVID L MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES PERSELL. WILLIAM R. SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B. TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F. TOMCZYK, MARK W. WITTKE. ANTHONY A. HENDRICKS. RONALD J. BOTTENBERG. WENDY C DAVIS. MARK L. GAFFRON. MICHAEL P. GAPPA. GREGORY A. MEYER. WILLIAM C. OMAN. LYLE E. PENCE. CHRISTOPHER M. WEINBERGER. PAUL E. BRINKHAUS. JOHN F. DEBAERE. DONALD L. GREGORY. JAMES D. HANSEN. STEVEN OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G. OBRIEN. RANDY L PALMER. GREGORY A, 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY $60350 $1,661 29 $677.04 $1,220.55 $1,394.47 $30.42 $384.82 $607.25 $676.67 $663.57 $0 00 $412.30 $1,568.91 $1,599.39 $1,465.73 $1,293.16 $2,136.19 $1,316.66 $1,540.74 $1,696.69 $97690 $475.24 $1,247.73 $570.79 $1,543.98 $434.50 $1,559.59 $271.22 $1,300.83 $962.01 $61583 $963.99 $1,141.76 $1,187.38 $1,656.05 $376 11 $9371 $939.61 $1.263 23 $1,18383 $1.172 79 $737.04 $949.89 $742 38 $345.87 $777 63 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/OC Outstanding 8/9/00 Void 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding 8/9/00 Outstanding '1^'■ CITY OF ORONO Paid Register 08/09/00 8 44 AM Page 2 Check Employee Number Number Employee Name Pay Period Pay Group Description Check Amount Check Date Status 16 BI-WEEKLY $1,034.26 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY S77651 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY $252.50 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY $106.75 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY $94.97 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY $257.77 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY $254.14 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY $172.99 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY $40.24 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY $118.16 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY $270.03 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY $79.16 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY $144.26 8/9/00 Outstanding 16 BI-WEEKLY $1,242.08 8/9/00 Outstanding 1^.'* i* - 047992 047993 047994 047995 047996 047997 047998 047999 048000 048001 048002 048003 048004 048005 473746173 469629194 470204924 471302023 470383444 475344512 468023715 472046373 516929416 473108428 476388054 474167795 473609629 475569177 RATHBUN, BARRY J. SKREEN. DALE S. ABRAHAMSON. FRED W. BIX. MILTON. H. BLAIR. JANIS A. MCINTYRE. WILLIAM E. MOSER. HEATHER L MOSER. JENNIFER M. NOBLE. ADAM OAS. DANIEL O. PEICKERT. GARY J. PETERSON. JACK W. ROSS. JOHN A. STEFFENHAGEN. RONALD $49,283.06 n II tm\II I ■■•y—*T CITY OF ORONO Check Summary Register Friday, August 11,2000 Page 1 of 2 Name BS^BBES Check Date Check Amt 10100 PrmaiyCas Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid UnPaid Unpaid UnPald Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid Unpaid UnPaid Unpaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid Unpaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid Unpaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid A-1 RENTAL AUGIES MOBILE CHEF BATTERIES PLUS BCA - FORENSIC SCIENCE LAB BEACK, SCOT BERGERSON-CASWELL INC. BIFFS INC BONESTROO ROSENE & ASSOC. BUDGET PRINTING BUFFALO BITUMINOUS INC. BUSINESS FORMS & ACCOUNTING CARGILL SAL CHAMPION AUTO STORES CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH CYS UNIFORMS DAHLGREN SHARDLOW & UBAN DAKOTA RAIL DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. DCA-WIRE ONL E Z RECYCLING EARTH BURNERS EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EKLUND TREE RECYCLING ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS ESS BROTHERS & SONS EULUS MANUFACTURING CO. INC. FEDEX FORD CONSTRUCTION FUZZY DUCK STUDIOS G & K SERVICES GEAR WEST SKI & BIKE GENUINE PARTS CO. HAWKINS CHEMICAL HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF HENNIPIN CTY TREASURER - PW HIGHWAY 55 RENTAL HINSHAW & CULBERTSON HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE JOHNSON. BRAD JOHNSON. JEF KD & COMPAN LANGFORD TOOL & DRILL LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN LOGIS LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT MAP UTILITIES INC. MAGIC CLEANERS $217.35 $42.00 $78.91 $200.00 $420 00 $15,471.75 $502.47 $40,321.75 $668.50 $66,104.95 $522.02 $2,048.08 $23.42 $1,708 05 $28.86 $83.30 $207.50 $525.00 $72.10 $238.96 $5,754.84 $125,459.38 $84 05 $40.00 $56.93 $7,036.85 $823.62 $5.72 $56,726.30 4)322.14 $565.63 $100.00 $19 26 $1,143.32 $38.61 $847.83 $96.60 $52.57 $9,823 71 $22.98 $186.97 $102.60 $875.00 $306 88 $1.000 00 $2.248 00 $58 94 $71 25 $6.66 Name Check Date Check Amt k M ■ OEEa Unpaid MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING $548.48 UnPaid MIDWEST ASPHALT $667.81 UnPaid MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO $350 30 UnPald MINNCOMM $8,172.90 UnPaid MINNEAPOLIS COM & TECH COLLEGE $31.50 UnPaid MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY $13.50 UnPaid MINNEGASCO $369.07 UnPaid MINNETONKA MIST $506.88 UnPaid MN DEPT OF REVENUE $3,539.00 UnPaid MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION $55.00 UnPaid MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER’S ASSN $400 00 UnPaid MN STATE BAR ASSOCIATION $390 00 UnPaid MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC.$1,331.88 Unpaid MR AUGIES COFFEE SERVICE $49.50 Unpaid MUNICIIITE CO.$97.22 UnPaid NAVARRE HARDWARE $24.52 UnPaid NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS $144.00 UnPaid NSP $6,294.96 UnPaki NSP-$3,873.00 Unpaid OLD DUTCH FOODS INC.$48.72 UnPaid P4L AUTOMOTIVE INC $165.00 UnPaid PEPSI-COLA $135.50 UnPaid PERSONNEL DECISIONS $2,610.00 UnPaid PETTIT. SANDRA K.$60.30 UnPaid PIONEER $832.66 UnPaid POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC.$1,693 35 Unpaid PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS $2,320 64 Unpaid PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE $604 20 UnPaid R.C. ELECTRIC. INC $90.00 UnPaid REED VENDING $251.90 UnPaid SAMARITAN TIRE CO INC $320.01 UnPaid SCHWABB INC.$33.12 UnPaid SHAUGHNESSY LAWN SERVICES $3,857.94 Unpaid SIGNS OF THE SEASON $166 00 UnPaid SKYWAY PUBLICATIONS $90 00 UnPaid SNYDER DRUG STORES $57.96 UnPaid STANTON GROUP $52.50 UnPaid STREICHERS $1,513.89 UnPaid SUBURBAN TIRE INC.$558.23 UnPaid TEMPORARIES-TO-GO $1,080.00 UnPaid THORPE DIST CO.$175.00 UnPaid TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY $14.13 UnPaid TRACY TRIPP FUELS $1,144.13 UnPaid TRI-K SERVICES $19531 UnPaid US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $201.56 UnPaid VERIZON WIRELESS $616.41 UnPaid VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER $393.83 UnPaid VILLAGE CHEVROLET $27.92 UnPaid VOGT HEATING & AIR $774.63 UnPaid WARNING LITES OF MN $108.95 UnPaid WEST SIDE REDI MIX INC.$37063 UnPaid WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE $75.95 UnPaid WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC $28.16 UnPaid YOUNG. JACKIE $575.00 Tout Checks $391,466.66 4 ..«.■■»■»,.^....r..«««.•. MPEtINQ AUG 1 4 2000 CITY UP OhO/vo information ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING kpj coiiwnii meeting AUG 1 4 2000 Pf OF Q\\ Y Ur UMONO f >4 ■I ii~^■■>in —I ■■r«i 1 ->«-r •t«- •-t- Mfiiinr ~i r r h- I"’ TO:Mayor and City Council Orono Highway 12 Design Review Committee FROM:Ron Moorse, City Administrator DATE:August 10,2000 (,UG ^ „,,OrOHONO SUBJECT:Update Regarding the Highway 12 Final Design Process Mn/DOT has selected TKDA as the Highway 12 final design consultant engineer. The kick-off meeting regarding the final design process was held on Wednesday, August 2. The minutes from the kick-off meeting are attached. Eisinger (Dump Site) Property The item discussed at the kick-off meeting with the greatest potential impact on the Highway 12 project was the discovery that the former dump site on the Eisinger property west of the Dumas Orchard contains hazardous materials that have contaminated the groundwater on the site. The new roadway is currently proposed to run through a substantial portion of this site. Mn/DOT is conducting an investigation of the extent of the contamination. Orono staff is working to obtain all of the currently available infomiation regarding the extent of the contamination. Schedule The final design schedule calls for a 30% complete final design by January of 2001. This could be delayed due to the Eisinger site issues. Aesthetic Design TKDA’s schedule includes the development of a draft Aesthetic Design Guide by January of 2001. This guide is to be developed with review and input from an Aesthetic Design Review Committee made up of representatives of the affected cities. This committee could include the members of the Highway 12 Design Review Committee, or could include other members. If you have any questions regarding the information in this memo or in the attached minutes, please call me. MEMORANDUM To:.Distribution List ')ies To;. Reference: TH 12. S.P. 2713-7.S Kick-Off Meeting \r ji:. Date:. Tim Chalupnik August 9. 2000 Commission No. 12128-OL 02 The Kick-Off Meeting for the project was held in the Mn/DOT Golden Valley Office on Wednesday, August 2,2000. A list of those in attendance is attached to this record. The following is a summary of my interpretation of the items discussed and the direction provided at the meeting. If you disagree with this or have any additional comments to be included in this record, please inform me. 1.Introductions Tim Chalupnik introduced the TKDA and HDR team members and discussed the project responsibilities for each person. Other persons in attendance introduced themselves to the group. 2.Project Background/Issucs 2.1. M"/DOT Pre-Design The layout as furnished to TKDA is up to date and has Staff Approval. Due to minor wording issues, the City of Wayzata has not yet furnished a resolution approving the layout, but they are expected to do so soon. The EA is approved and it is expected that the FONSl will be issued in October. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was completed in 1995 and was updated last year. There are 15 known or potential contaminated sites within the Project Con idor. The former municipal dump, east of County Road 6, is larger than was previously anticipated. This site has contaminated the ground water and has direct implications to the location of the roadway in that area. Drilling is necessary in this area to determine the extent of the contamination. This drilling caimot be done until after freeze up this fall or winter. Several of the contaminated sites will impact desired locations for storm water ponds. Mn/DOT Water Resources: The diversion of a 2-year event from Long Lake to Long Lake Creek is being considered. Water quality is an issue with the diversion alternate. It is estimated that approximately 20 atres of wetlands wli be impacted. There will be approximately 760 feet of encroachment into the floodplain and 14,000 cubic yards of fill placed in the floodplain. The expansion of some of the ponds will provide floodplain mitigation. There will need to be some off site wetland mitigation. A meeting will be held on August 8th with the Hennepin Conservation District to discuss the approach to wetland mitigation. Meetings with the other reviewing agencies will follow. 2.2. Long Lake Timing and scheduling of the project is important to tlie residents. They want the project to proceed to completion as quickly as possible. The City will be losing about 100 housing units which is about 10% of the ta,x base. This will have a big impact on their ability to pay for their cost share amount. City facilities will be impacted by the construction. They want to know the amount of funding to be provided by Mn/DOT for the fire station. Construction limits in the vicinity of the Fleming Addition are desired as soon as possible. Acquisition of the Virginia Ave. area is desired. Noi.se reduction, pedestrian overpasses, replacement of sidewalks, trails and park land are important issues to the City. SEH is preparing a study of the impacts of the roadway construction to the sanitary sewer and water systems in the area. They estimate that it wil' cost $6.5 million to replace the sanitary sewer and $1 million for the watermains. This includes some increase in capacity. It is expected that the study will be comp.T'e in about six weeks. Other issues can are discussed in the Memorandum of Understanding. 2.3. 2.4. Orono Timing and scheduling of the project is important to the residents. They want the project to proceed to completion as quickly as possible and for right-of- way to be acquired soon. They are concerned with the diversion of waters from Long Lake to Long Lake Creek and the impact to water quality. They want an opportunity to provide input to the design and aesthetics early in the design process. 2.5. Wayzata There are no residential impacts in Wayzata. There are two Country Clubs in the vicinity that are sensitiye to the lighting, signing, height of bridges, noise and other aesthetic issues. They are interested in knowing the impacts and compensation for impacts to i the Public Works Facility. This facility will need to be relocated. Suggested consideration of surcharging an area where it is known that poor foundation soils exist. Noise is a concern. There is a possibility of watermain interconnections between Wayzata and Orono. 2.6. Hennepin County The County believes that the bridge on Brown Road, CR 146, should be widened to have 10' shoulders. Bruce Polaczyk said that this would meet the Met Council’s pending Transportation Policy Improvement plan requirements, The County does not agree with the cost sharing for that extra width as proposed by Mn/DOT (1/3 Mn/DOT, 1/3 County, 1/3 City). They will send a letter to Mn/DOT addressing these concerns. 2.7. BNSF They have no concerns with the project but do want to review the plans. Anyone who enters BNSF property needs to have a card which certifies that they have had Safety Orientation. This orientation caji be obtained at www.contractororientation.com. The cost is $10.00 per person. After completion of the orientation, a card will be mailed. Persons entering the property are also required to wear hard hats, protective eyewear and steel toed shoes. 3.Aesthetic Design 3.t. Approach TKDA will visit the project corridor and identify features and issues that may affect the aesthetics of the project. An Aesthetic Design Review Committee will be established and will probably consist of 3 or 4 persons from Mn/DOT, 2 or 3 persons from each City and a facilitator from TKDA. The existing Design Review Committee will meet first; however, committee membership is subject to change. Mn/DOT preliminary bridge design staff requested that they be involved in aesthetic issues associated with the bridges. Gary Mueller will provide TKDA with an outline of the steps that he has used on other projects to develop an Aesthetic Design Guide. It is anticipated that a draft of the guide will be completed for the 30% submittal which is scheduled for January 2001. 3.2. Meetings It is expected that the first meeting for the Aesthetic Design Review ____ Committee will be held in September. 4.Schedule A detailed schedule is being prepared by TKDA for distribution at a later date. The schedule that was included in the proposal and modified to show the actual notice to proceed date was distributed at the meeting. It would be desirable to perform the noise analysis after the 30% plans have been reviewed. This would lessen the possibility of rework due to alignment or profile changes. A concern was expressed that the noise wall locations could affect right-of-way. Tim Chalupnik and Tim Casey will meet with .Hm Hansen to review this situation and determine if noise analyses in speci* • areas should be done at this time. It was agreed that wetland delineations in the project area could be put on hold until next spring. 5.Monthly Progress Meetings 5.1. Scheduled Date and Time A progress meeting will be held at 1 :00 PM on the first Wednesday of the month. TKDA arid Mn/DOT will establish a schedule of meeting locations. Some meetings may be held in the Project area. The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss technical design issues. All persons on the distribution list will be furnished a copy of the agenda for each meeting and should determine i is necessary for them to be at the meeting. Agendas and meeting minutes will be distributed via e-mail. Review committee meetings may be held periodically at different times. 6.Data Collecticn / Status of Information Already Provided 6.1. CADD Files All CADD files have been furnished to TKDA, 6.2. Water Resource Information All water resource information has been furnished to TKDA. 6.3. Other All of the existing utilities have not been surv eyed or included on the furnished mapping. Completion of the utility surveys by Mn/DOT may not be complete until spring of 2001. TKDA does not have sufficient hours budgeted for ihis amount of surveying. The information will be needed before spring. Tony Winiecki will check on the availability of Mn/DOT to complete the surveys in the near future. 7. 8.Other Luce Line Trail bridge over old TH 12 will be a separate project but should be coordinated with the work of this project. Any changes to construction limits should be provided to Mn/DOT Right-of-Way staff as soon as possible.TH 12 SP 2713-75 Nome Organization Dan Dorgan Mn/DOT Daniel.dorgan^dot.state.ninu5 Tony Winiecki Mn/DOT Ar.thonN winiccki r7dot.statg mn Gayle Gedstad Mn/DOT Gnvlc.yedstad^’'dol.state.mn.u5 Dave Baker Mn/DOT David.bakcr^dot ^tate mn ti^ Tom O’Keefe MnAX)T Thomas okee fe^^dol state . mn us Scott Pedersen Mn/DOT Scott pederson ^dot stale mn us Jim Hansen Mn/DOT James hansenf//^dot.state.mn us Dennis Larson Mn/DOT Dennis.larsonY^dot.state.mn us Ben Timerson Mn/DOT Deniamin.timer5on^(j^dot.state.mnus Keith Slater Mn/DOT Keith slater^dot state.mn us Deb Anderson Mn/DOT Debra.anderson^g'dot.state mn us John Isackson Mn/DOT John.isackson^dot state mn us Lee Williams Mn/DOT Lee.williams^dot.state.mn.us Liz Benjamin Mn/DOT Tliyahelh.Beiamain'jf dot state mn us Ray Cekalla Mn/DOT Rav.cekalla^dot.state.mn.us David Hall Mn^OT David.hall^dot state mn us Brian Henry Mn/DOT Brian.henry l/'doLstate.mn.us Dave Torfin Mn/DOT David.tortln^dot.stQte.mn.us Joe Korzilios Mn/DOT Joe korzilius/^dot.state.mn.us Don Paulson Mn/DOT Dtin paulson'^dot.state mn.us Charles Hudrlik Mn/DOT < harles.hudrlik^dot state mn us Larry McKenzie Mn/DOT I .irr\ mcken/ie^jl dot state mn us Lars Impola Mn/DOT I ars impola <7 dot state mn.iis Beverly Farraher Mn/DOT Beverly farraher r/dot.stnte mn us Mike Gerbensky Mn/DOT Michael gerbenskv (/dot state mn us Linda Taylor Mn/TX)T Linda tavlorr/ dot.state mn us SueLodahl Mn/DOT Sue lodahl (I dot.state mn iis JefT Gibbens Mn/IXDT Jeff gibbens'^^f dot state mn us Maureen Jensen MnVDOT Maureen iensen ^f dot state mn us Scott Bradley Mn/DOT Scott bradlcv^?dot state mn us Paul Walvatne^ Mn/DOT Paul walvatne {j'dot.state mn us Nancy Radle Mn/DOT Nancy radle dot ^tate mn us Distribution List Responsibility Program Delivery Phone 651-582-1481 Fax 651-582-1302 Consultant Design 651-582-1211 651-582-1131 Consultant Design 651-^82-1584 651-582-1131 Tech. Support 651-297-2680 651-282-9834 PreDesign 651-582-1296 651-582-1308 Pre Design 651-582-1304 651-582-1308 Trans. Planning 651-582-1392 651-582-1368 Water Res. Eng.651-634-2078 651-634-2085 Water Res. Eng.651-797-3055 763-797-3181 Right of Way 651-582-1300 651-582-1496 Right of Way 651-582-1658 651-582-1496 Right of Way 651-582-1273 651-582-1496 Right of Way 651-582-1535 651-582-1496 Consmiction 763-797-3067 763-797-3089 Bridge 651-747-2172 651-747-2115 Bndgc 651-747-2174 651-747-2115 Surveys 763-797-3101 763-797-3105 Surveys 763-797-3113 763-797-3105 Materials 761-797-3019 763-797-3910 Materials 763-797-3020 763-797-3910 Metro TrafTic 763-797-3132 763-797-3152 Metro Traffic 763-797-3143 763-797-3152 Metro Traffic 763-797-3126 763-797-3152 Metro Traffic 651-634-2152 651-634-2085 Metro TrafTic 763-797-3140 763-797-3152 Metro Traffic 651-483-6752 651-582-1010 CO Traffic 651-284-3470 651-205-4526 Maintenance 651-582-1431 651-582-1008 Freeway Operations 651-582-1341 651-582-1131 Env. Services 651-284-3758 651-284-0083 Env. Services 651-284-3793 651-284-0083 Env. Services 651-284-3781 651-284-3754 e-mail Sarma Straumanis Mn/DOT Samia straumanis^dol.statc mn.us Rich Lamb Mn/TX)T Rich lamh^dot state mn us Joe Pignato Mn/DOT Joe pignato'^^dot.state mn.us Bruce Mikkelson Mn/DOT Rnice.mikkelsQn^dot.statc.mn.us Gary Mueller Mn/DOT Gary mueilcr^^dot state mn us Judy Jacobs Mn/DOT Judv iacohsTj^dot state mn us Bob Drown Mn/DOT Bob.brown^dot slate.mn us Patti Loken Mn/DOT Patti.loken fJ'dot state mn us •Indicates attendance at meeting. Name Organization Tim Chalupnik TKDA Chalupnikta <?tkda.com Ron Ley TKDA Matt Wassman TKDA Wassman.ma^^^tkda.com Gerry Ramaker TKDA Ramaker.ga^g^tkdacom Stcve^SchTcic^hcr TKDA Schleichersi^jjj^tkdacQm Julie Famham TKDA Famham ie tkda coni Vince Montgomery TKDA Mnntgomervvt^tkda.com Tim Casey HDR tcasev^hdrinc.com Sarah Emery HDR seme hdrinc.com JimGrube Hennepin Co, James.gmhe^ co.hennepin mn us Bruce Polaczyk Hennepin Co. Bmcc polaczvk'^f/^co.hennepin mn us Ron Moorsc City of Orono Rmoorse^ci orono mn us GregGappa CityofOrono Ggappa ^ci orono.mil us Shannon Sweeney City of Long Lake ake mn us Dave Dudinsky City of Wayzata Davc^i^wavynta org JeffEckerle BNSF JcfTrev.eckerleYfhnsfcom Env. Sen iccs 651-284-3788 651-284-3754 Foundations 651-779-5595 651-779-5616 Utility Agreements 651-296-7018 651-296-9968 Utility Agreements 651-296-8652 651-296-1805 Site Development 651-296-2303 651-282-6022 Public Affairs 651-582-1365 651-582-1368 Metro State Aid 651-582-1351 651-582-1368 Metro State Aid 651-582-1373 651-582-1368 Responsibility Project Manager Phone 651-292-4430 Fax 651-292-0083 Project Manager Drainage Engineer 651-292-4458 651-292 4587 651-292-0083 651-292-0083 Roadway Engineer 651-292-4402 651-292-0083 Engr Specialist 651-292-4415 65l-292-0(n^> Aesthetic Design 651-292-4436 651-292-0083 Railroads 651-292-1442 651-292-0083 Env. Scientist 763-591-5450 763-591-5413 Wetlands 763-591-5475 763-591-5419 Trans. Engineer 763-745-7507 763-478-4000 Design Engineer 763-745-7650 763-478-4000 City Administrator 952-249-4600 952-249-4616 Design Engineer 952-249-4621 952-249-4616 City Administrator 952-473-6961 952-476-9622 Dir. Public Services 952-404-5361 952-404-9417 Project Manager 612-782-3491 612-782-3061 ADDITIONAL MEETING ATTENDEES Larry Dec Patrick McLamon ClifTlnmon Marv Wurzer Dan Boxrud Mn/DOT Mn/DOT BNSF C ity of Long Lake SHH Pre Design Water Res. Project Engineer Long Lk. City Engr. 65l-582-13"8 763-797-:!51 612-782-3495 952-473-6961 952-912-2603 •Indicates attendance at meeting. »t e-mail Lev re fTtkda com Swccncv^fj^ci.long' 1^' August 14,2000 To: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour and Council Members From; Greg Gappa Subject: Purchase of Trees for City Hall and Public Works We received a call today from Wes Bendickson, who owns a nursery and landscaping company in Independence. He grows larger trees for sale and transplanting and has some excess trees he is willing to sell to Orono at a reduced cost. He has 12’-14’ high Scotch and Norway Pine and Ash Trees available that he is willing to sell for $420 each. This cost would include transplanting and is reasonable. He has a 90" tree spade to allow for transplanting these larger trees. We have discussed this issue and may want to consider buying four of these trees. Two ash trees could be planted by the Public Works driveway to screen the big garage door, and two evergreen trees could be planted to help screen the police vehicle parking area. We would like to receive Council direction on this the possibility of purchasing this trees. W., Mr 4 • V 1964 Park Avenue Lon^Lakc. MN 55356 Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department July 25. 2000 Orono City Council Members Long Lake City COUhcil Mmbers r / 'V , ,*xO / o .A O o" Medina City Council Members •i- Dear Sir or Madam: Happy Spring and early Summer! Attached is a recap of the second quarter (of 2000) for the Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department. Spring and early Summer proved to be a busy time for the Fire Department Team Members. Some highlights for the quarter include: 2*^ Call - The Department kicked off what should be the start of a long and rewarding tradition: the Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department Second Call Organization. We had over 300 people become members of the 2°^ Call. To cap all things off, we held the I* Armual dinner, celebrating the beginning of the new Organization. Community Night Out - On June 19, we “hosted ” a community night out. We took all of our vehicles and went to different areas of the community and simply spent time with the residents. It was aiiother huge success. We gave out smdee detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, fire extinguishers and reflective numbers to identify house addresses. In many cases, we actually put the number on the mailbox at the homeowner ’s direction. We also hosted our annual Pancake Breakfast. Thank you, in advance, for your continued partnership. Sincerely, Steve Persian Fire Chief, Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department Prevention Through Community Interaction m i 5^ .'■■i Long Luke Fire Department Second Quarter 2000 Activities Mcctiagi_____________Hours Trainings Hours Other Activities Hours Fire/iMcdical/Rcscue Calls Total Hours 294 Arts Festival (medical) Gear West Dualthon Buckhom Days Memorial Dt^^ Mound City Days Parade Total Hours 14 6 94 26 6 358 Spring and early summer allow for more outside training and events. Department members volunteered 777 hours of their tinx* to maintain a high level of readiness Tor all types of emergencies. In all. the department membeis gave 2,461 hours of their time for training, mcetins, calls and other volunteer activities during the second quarter of the year. Training is always a top priority at the department and the second quarter was no exception. Outside instructors taught members about foam applications and (bom operations on Engine 11, Engine 12 and Utility 11. Experts also educated the members on Cumulative Incident Stress Disorder and related debriefings. Mike Thompson participated in a regional stale fire school at Alexandria and brought back his R.LT. (Rapid Intervention Team) training to the department. Our Train ing Officer (Rick Fredericksen) and Fire Medic (Tony Roe) combined their talents and training to stage a mock personal injury accident with mulitple victirm (M^>le Plain Firefighter Explorers) and scenarios at the Woodhill Country Club (thank you Woodhill). Ihis extensive hands-on training was conducted in real tinw with live communications and Oono PD Resen-e assistance. Great learning experience and practice for all involved! The deportment decision and policy making meetings also gamer a lot of volunteer time. Members also must keep the department up to date on mutual aid issues, county issues, planning and pension issues as well as state and federal legislative issues that pertain to the department. The Relief Association oversees the pension plan and the charitable gambling. All in all, the second quarter meetings accounted for 294 of the member’s volunteer hours. Besides running the department and keeping on lop of trainings and meetings, the department's members kicked off the charter year of the Long Lake Volunteer Fire Deportment Second Call. This very successful fundraiser allo\*.« interested people to axiu-ibute to the department and to leam more about the deportment and its members. The first Second Call dinner featured Wayzata Fire Department's Chief Paul Kloprich as the speaker. Jackets were distributed to the charter members by members volunteering their time. The anmud pancake breakfast was held in April and the Community Night Out was held in June. The department was also involved « Buckhom Days. Memorial Day and also provided medical coverage to several other events, iinginc 12 showed off its new red paint at the Mound City Days pwade. This is Just a primer for the third quarter when the department plans to participate in parades at Delano, Hamel and Ixrng Ijike's own Com I>a>s. *'See you therel Hours Lake Region 16 Foam 50 Saturdays/Evenings:Long Lake 152 United Firefighters 18 Incident Stress 43 Station Clcon-up 6 Medina 91 Facilities 8 Fireground/Boat Rescue 38 Second Call Dinner 26 Mutual Aid - Building 13 Small Engines/SCBA 45 Second Call Prep.14 Orono 685 Henn. County Chiefs 6 Extncation/Medical 60 Second Call Jackets 14 Ibtal 1 lours 928 Planning (Officer's)4S State Fire School (RIT)16 Community Night Out 39 Relief Association 68 Mock Drill Set-up 4 Pancake Breakfast 108 Relief Trustees 18 Total Hours 256 Gear West Run (medical)3 Business 102 Girl Scout (Brownies)2 TO: FAX: FAX COVERSHEET CITY OF MOUND 6341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND1 MN 66364 PHONE: 612-4-72•0600 FAX: 612-472-0620 FROM: DATE: TOTAL PAGES 3 PURPOSE: REMARKS: _ For your infonnatlan _.,_Asyaurequlltld Aawedllcuaed ._._ _Tab appraprllta ac:tfcn Ravlaw and NtUm- _ Rlply 1D unda, _ For ,au, 1ppn1VII -01her IN• remarks) fl .•,111,---· !I • • • 11, • • • • • • • • • r 4 •• • • I • • • •• • • •• 11 • � -----.....,.._.� ---- ----- . . 100 ............. . .·zz 0010 1 o . . CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUN MINNESOTA55364-1887 (812)472-o80O DATE: TO: FROM: RE: MEMO August 9, 2000 Douglu Ba . cock, LMCD Chairman Greg Nrh , LMC -�-cutive Director Mayor Pat Meisel Mound City Council Members ndia Hanson, City Manager I creued Water Patrol on Lake Minnetonka FAX (812) 472-0e20 At it's August 8, 2000 meeting, the Mound ity Council considered LMCD R lation 99 requesting LMCD member cities to subsidize the cost of two additional patrol officers for Lake Minnetonka, m the amount of $100,000.00. h-lembers voted to not upport the 11 solution. tolpt #1. It is the opinion of the Council tha any increase in pro.blems caused directly by charter boats and liquor consumption on charter boats may be directly controll d by LMCD. As the licensing agency, LMCD may control the quantity and type of operation with no increase in law enforcement costs to member cities. Violations could be addressed ·gh the licensing controls. Should these commercial opera ·ons in some way create the need for more police presence, those co•sts should be passed directly through to th licensee in the form of higher fees. It is not the role of the City of Mound to subsidize private business in · s manner. taint @a. It is the op. . on of the City of Mound Council that this proposal is the esult of recent �,tigation that h redu�ed he authonty of water patrol volunteers. That outcom is not the, responsibility of loc · . · cipalities; tha · is a Hennepin County pro lem .. �;a.;;..t w.,:#r..:. 0v r the years, Lake Minnetonka municipalitie have been subjec ed to mandates for .more access� .d mo'"e parking. These mandate have me ed parking congestio.n and have othetM squeeze the City of Mound, with no accompanying · ·.eans . f relief. This, too, •'s a reg 1 problem, tba as been made the burd. n of a ® pr/ I don� ,_,,., zz 00/0 I 0 ·trol o 1---ity t i th op on of Council that th agenc e that plac · r q iri m n o uruc pal · · sh uld bear th burden . f the impac • t #4. It 1 a fact that c •·ti urround g Lake M. tonka. pay a great r sh of the tax u ed to regulate Lake M.etonka already. It i the opinion of th Cou cil marketing che es that aw co umer om welJ o t 1de the Mo d ar ho d funded by the er (i.e. lice mg fees or urcharges) which, in tum, wi l fund the cost of incr, ased water patrol. Lie nsing requ · ements co u d, in fact, require hired rnanne patrol a condition ofp nnit approval. LMCD member ci ·es should no be expect ed to pay for mcreased law enforcement for these types of I e activities. t . this increase were to pas by majority vote of e LMCD membership, the City of Moun has tw . aining concerns. I) It ·s critical that the two additional otlicen be dedicated to Lake Minnetonka and that there are assurances that existing water patro o Lake ·. etonka not be rotated to other location 2) An alert that MCD's 33% participation in thi program wi .1 re ult in a loss of services to member ,cities otb rwise provided by those same dollars Fo th se reasons, the Ci y of Mound is opposed to supporting LMCD Resolution 99. Should you ave further questions or wis further d1scuss1on, you are m.vited to contact the C"ty Manager or visit with Council Members at a regularly scheduled meeting. Cc·• City of Tonka Bay City of Deeph ven City of Minnetrista c·ty o . Spring Parle C ty of Wayata City of Minnetonka Beach City of Victoria City of Exc ets·or City of Minnetonka City of Orono City of Shorewood City ofWoodl d City of Greenwood ---··-··----..--.. ·-. --·--··-._. ___·-· -··· -· O..\filOI dO A.LI� 00/01/80