Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-12-2000 Council PacketPublic Attendance Meeting D ate L, I Zt- o 6 §□□ C ouncil Planning commission Park C ommission Other • V ' * ‘V*. pPLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION iSl-'Dirrutircnrn RRinw FOH mm rirv recukus. > y V gv REQUESTED BELOW FOR pUR CITY RECORDS. . ■ • ' l‘‘v - ■ ;. •^Ww."iSS-fe.i NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER ihkl (c.\a>-d ‘^ li. Krc-^ C ' CL-A rl. o (V^ArtlT>arYx; ni iTltPiC^OL^J L.'^ /DoA^.An !)^>^(Y\s\V(,(\\--------- 10.. 11. 12. 13.. 14. ■4 f • V . TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator / June 12,2000 COoa,McpjifgQ I 2 2000 CITY OF OftONo Deletion of the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation Grant Application from the June 12 Council Meeting Agenda The June 12 Council meeting agenda includes a resolution authorizing the submittal of a grant application to the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation for funding assistance related to the consolidation of the Cities of Long Lake and Orono. The staff of the Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation has reviewed a preliminary draft of the grant application, and has identified some areas of concern. They have suggested the application be revised. Therefore this item can be eliminated from the agenda, and will be brought forward for Council action with a revised grant application. F ^ »-r r- ‘‘■V* ■'!' P TO:Mayor and City Council FROM:Ron Moorse, City Administrator COnMpii mpeting M 1 2 2000 CITY Or unuivo DATE:June 12,2000 SUBJECT: Rescheduling of the June 15 Work Session Due to the Mayor and City Administrator having conflicting meetings the morning of June 15, the work session scheduled for 7:30 a.m. on June 15 needs to be rescheduled. The Council could reschedule for 7:30 a.m. on June 22 or to the regularly scheduled work session on June 29. At this time the two agenda items for the work session would be the draft of the Parks, Open Space and Trails element of the Comprehensive Plan, and a request to realign the intersection at Wildhurst T rail and County Road 19. 1 r .5 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 coi IMCJL WEET'NQ JUN 1 2 2000 ROLL The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Bob Sansevere, Richard Flint, and Charles Kelley. City Council Representative Barbara Peterson was absent. Representing Staff were City Attorney Thomas Barrett, City Administrator Ron Moorse, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator Wendy Bcttenberg, Director of Public Ser\'ices Greg Gappa, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m CONSENT AGENDA (#1) APPROVE/AMEND Items 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 14 were added to the Consent Agenda. Item 16 was deleted from the Consent Agenda. Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE; Ayes 4, Nays 0. AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - RELAY FOR LIFE This item was not discussed due to the lack of a representative from the American Cancer Society being present at tonight's meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *(#2) RECONVENED BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF MAY 8, 2000 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the minutes of the Reconvened Board of Review Meeting of May 8, 2000, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. iM 'Ik t’ ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 (#3) Regular Council Meeting of May 8, 2000 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of May 8, 2000, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sherokee Use, Representative Use noted the Park Tour has been rescheduled to July 5th due to the special Consolidation Committee meeting being set for June 5th. Kelley indicated he would be unable to make the Park Tour on July 5th due to the 4th of July holiday, and suggested the tour be rescheduled sometime in the fall. Gappa stated they will consider rescheduling the park tour for the fall. Mayor Jabbour indicated he has been contacted by two individuals who are interested in donating some land to the City for use as park land, and will keep the Park Commission informed of the matter. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - Llli McMillan, Representative McMillan stated the LMCD has been working hard on lake access issues and dock issues recently due to the problems they experienced last year in Mound. McMillan stated there is an issue surrounding a piece of peninsula land located in the Mound area where the people inland were under the assumption they had been deeded lake access rights. The parties have gone through a considerable amount of litigation involving this matter, with the City of Mound requesting to relocate those inland docks into existing fire lanes in an elTort to provide dock access to the inland people. McMillan stated the fire lanes are very narrow in width, with a maximum of 30 feet at most of the locations, which do not comply with the LMCD's setback requirements for docks and would require a considerable number of variances. McMillan stated the judge presiding over this case has told the City of Mound that if the LMCD agrees with them on this issue, they may go ahead and locate the docks within the fire lanes. McMillan expressed frustration over this process and the pressure being felt by the LMCD to approve these docks. McMillan stated the LMCD is also working on the Conversion of Use Ordinance, which would convert commercial property, such as marinas, to allow for other options for redevelopment of those areas in an eflbrt to bring them more into compliance with the LMCD’s I in 50 rule. McMillan stated the LMCD did attempt to pass a 1 in 20 and a I in 25 rule for these areas, both of which were denied. McMillan stated this issue is in limbo and will be voted on auain ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 (LMCD, Continued) in June. Kelley suggested McMillan vote for what is best for the lake and not be persuaded by pressure being exerted by the parties involved in the dock issue. McMillan stated location of docks within fire lanes would set a dangerous precedent. Mayor Jabbour noted he had suggested the LMCD hold a work session regarding the dock issue over a year ago, with a definite method being developed to handle these situations. Jabbour stated the ordinance regulating municipal docks in his view is not appropriate and should be rewritten. Jabbour noted the docks in Minnetonka Beach were deeded to the Village of Minnetonka Beach by J.J. Hill. Jabbour stated the DNR and the state legislature were approached a number of years ago regarding the parcels of land located on the lake which had been deeded to the public at large. Jabbour commented they attempted to place those pieces of land into a lottery system so they could be awarded to people throughout the state, which did not pass. Jabbour stated if the land has been deeded to the general public, the land should not be restricted in his view to one segment of the population and should be available to all citizens. Jabbour acknowledged the LMCD will experience a great deal of pressure regarding the dock issue, but encouraged McMillan to do what is best for the lake. Kelley thanked McMillan for her efforts on the LMCD PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Bill Stoddard, Representative Bill Stoddard stated he would be available for questions at tonight's meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS None ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT *(#4) #2578 DAVID AND LORRAINE LUNDBERG, 900 DAKOTA AVENUE - VARUNCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4469 Sanseverc moved, Rint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4469, 3 A I ti I ■ ■ 11 11 ip-a -^**~^*- r if-: ,.r I ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 (#2578 David and Lorraine Luiidberg, Continued) a Resolution Granting a Side Yard Setback of 11 feet where 30 feet is required to permit the construction of a two-story garage addition to the existing residence located at 900 Dakota Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#5) #2580 TIMOTHY PATTRIN, 1360 RAILROAD AVENUE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4470 Kelley indicated he does not have a pioblem with granting the variance requested in this application, but would like the City Council to address the safety concerns relating to Spates Avenue located to the north. Mayor Jabbour commented that the City's consultant has advised the City to close off Spates Avenue and put a stoplight at the intersection of County Road 15 and County Road S1 . Jabbour stated in his view the City Council should review this issue. Kelley moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4470, a Resolution Granting a Street Side Yard Setback to Allow the Construction of a 624 .square foot attached garage to the existing residence located at 1360 Rail'*./ad Avenue. Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the Applicant would be in favor of closing Spates Avenue Pattrin stated he is in favor of closing Spates Avenue, and indicated in his view the neighborhood is in favor of that as w ell Pattrin expressed safety concerns due to the high speed of traffic in the area and the failure of cars to stop for the stop sign. Mayor Jabbour stated one reason the road has not been closed in the past was the presence of a gas station in this area, which has since been closed The City Council directed City Staff to review closure of Spates Avenue and to set this matter on for a public hearing. VOTE ON ABOVE MOTION: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#6) #2582 FRANCIS AND SUSAN ANN KOUBSKY, 4784 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4471 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4471 a Resolution Granting a Front Yard Setback to Allow the Construction of an Attached ‘i-V k' .■ t * ' : ♦ 'V : ^'‘j. m ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 (^2582 Francis and Susan Koubsky, Continued) Garage/Room Addition to the Existing Residence Located at 4784 North Shore Drive. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(H1) #2583 ROXANN BEISCH, 3436 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4472 Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4472 a Resolution Granting a Hardcover Variance and Side Yard Setback Variance to Permit Construction of a New Garage at the Residence Located at 3436 Livingston Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Item No. 8 Follows Item 16. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Jabbour noted the traffic report conducted by the City's consultant has recommended the installation of a stop light at the County Road 15 and County Road 51 intersection Jabbour stated Minnetonka Beach is also reviewing County Road 15 trafllc issues at the present time Kelley stated he would be in favor of reviewing this situation as well as acquiring additional land if need be in order to do this project correctly. Gappa stated Mn/DOT would probably want to upgrade this intersection to the new standards if a stoplight were to be installed at that location. Gappa indicated further study of this issue would need to be undertaken to determine what work should be done in this area. Mayor Jabbour noted the Consolidation Committee has voted unanimously to recommend a merger of the Cities of Long Lake and Orono. Jabbour stated the next step in the process is a review of the merger plan by both City Councils, which should be received in the next few days, followed by a work session to discuss the pros and cons contained in the report. Jabbour stated a Joint meeting with »he Long Lake City Council regarding this issue is tentatively scheduled for June 5th, at which time the City Council has the option of voting on the merger plan. Flint stated the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is still willing to work with the City of Orono and are waiting to receive a response back from Orono on where the City feels regional ponding areas should be located Flint noted the City Council currently is working on a number of projects that take priority over this, but that the City should address this issue. 5 i- ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 f It w V '¥'[ t t 'r V (Mayor/Council Report, Continued) Mayor Jabbour commented that information should be included in the City's Comprehensive Plan and could be given to the MCWD. Sansevere stated he has heard some concerns regarding the water level of Lake Minnetonka and the possibility of allowing dock extensions Sansevere inquired whether they would need to apply to the LMCD for a dock extension McMillan noted the water level of Lake Minnetonka has been lower in the past than what the current water level is. McMillan stated the residents are free to apply for a dock extension permit. Sansevere inquired when the City Council will be reviewing the issue of choosing a police consultant. Moorse stated he has received some proposals back from a number of consultants and will be setting this item on the City Council agenda in the near future. Flint stated he has reviewed the letter from the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission, and inquired whether the City has a policy as stated in the letter for the extension of cable TV service throughout the City. Moorse stated the City currently does not have a specific policy relating to this, but that the Cable Company has its own policies regarding the number of houses that are required within a certain area in order for cable to be installed. Moorse stated City Staff is assembling a map of the various subdivisions within the City, which will also reflect areas of the City where there is expected to be higher density in the future. Moorse stated City Staff' will be supplying this information to the Cable Commission for their review. Kelley commented the City of Orono should have a policy in which it is recommended or required that the utility companies and cable companies bury their lines whenever possible. Flint stated it was his understanding the agreement recently signed with the Cable Commission had stated the cable company would bring fiber optic to Orono as of a particular date. Moorse stated it was his understanding they would not bring it to every person's residence but will be building a fiber optic backbone within the City Kelley requested Moorse review the agreement to see whether the City can request the cable company bury their lines. [#' ■r • f 4 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 ENGINEER REPORT (#9) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT U\ - 2000 LIFT STATION PROJECTS Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve Request for Payment ^1, 2000 Lift Stations Project to Ford Construction, Inc., in the amount of S26,489.90. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Item #10 follows Item #15. *(#11) APPROVE PURCHASE OF GOLF COURSE GREENS MOWERS Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the purchase of two Toro GR 100 Greens mowers from MTI Distributing, Plymouth, Minnesota, fora maximum cost of $8,200, with the appropriate budget adjustment for the 2000 Golf Course Capital Outlay Budget. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#12) SCHEDULING OF JOINT COUNCIL MEETING WITH CITY OF LONG LAKE Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to schedule a joint meeting/public information meeting with the Long Lake City Council at 7:00 p.m., on Monday, June 5, 2000, at the Orono High School Cafeteria. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#13) LONG LAKE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT REFURBISHMENT INVOICE Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to aiithor;/e payment of the invoice for the refurbishment and repainting of Engine No. II of the Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department in the amount of $13,301.14, and to amend the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund Budget to reflect this expenditure. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *(#14) APPROVE GOLF COURSE SEASONAL EMPLOYEE Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve the revised employee list, including the new employee, Lowell Swanson, at the proposed wage rate of $6.80 per hour, and under the applicable provisions of the PERA rules. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. I % ■ E t-i ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 (#15) SCHEDULING OF COUNCIL WORK SESSION Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to schedule a City Council Work Session for Thursday, June 1, 2000, at 7:30 a.m., to discuss the Consolidation Committee's Final Report. VOTE; Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#10) v^UOTATIONS FOR NAVARRE PARKING LOT LIGHTING Gappa reviewed his May 22, 2000 memorandum regarding the installation of new lights and repaving of the Navarre Munirioal Parking Lot. Gappa stated the existing lights in the parking lot were originally installed back in the 1960s and consist of 400 watt cobra head style Mercury Vapor lights on 30 foot poles. The Council had concerns regarding these lights since they are not aesthetically pleasing, are inefficient for lighting purposes, and the mercury is an environmental problem. Gappa recommended two additional lights be installed in the northwest corner of the parking lot. Gappa stated the new lights would consist of 250 watt high pressure sodium lights on 30 foot poles. Gappa stated the new lights would be within the recommended standards for parking lot lighting. Gappa noted the existing parking lot lights are owned by the City and are maintained by NSP under a flat mon'hly fee per light. The majority of Orono's street lights are owned and maintained by NSP under a flat monthly fee. Gappa stated they will need to verify the property lines prior to any work commencing on the parking lot. Kelley inquired whether the City will be blacktopping the entire parking lot. Gappa stated he has discussed this issue with the property owners in the area who have indicated they are not interested in blacktopping their portion of the parking lot. The City's blacktop contractor has indicated he would be willing to blacktop their section of the parking lot at the time the City's portion is blacktopped. Kelley questioned whether the City should proceed forward with this project since the business owners are not interested in completing their portion of the parking lot. Mayor Jabbour noted the City Council did approve this project last year. Kelley commented he would like to have the other property owners support this project Mayor Jabbour stated the City Council could make this project contingent upon the other property owners agreeing to take part in this project or assessing a portion of the costs to the individual property owners. Mayor Jabbour stated in his view the City should proceed forward with this project, and suggested the property owners be contacted once again concerning this project. i • ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22,2000 (Navarre Parking Lot Lighting, Continued) Flint stated he is very supportive of the project and would like to see it proceed. Flint indicated he would be in favor of assessing the costs if necessary. Kelley inquired whether the City is complying with the lighting standards for commerical parking lots. Kelley inquired why 30 foot poles are being recommended. Gappa stated the City Engineer has recommended the 30 foot poles in orde; to achieve the proper lighting >\idth across the entire parking lot. Kelley stated he would like to proceed forward with the project, noting there appears to be some questions that need to be answered prior to any work commencing on this project. Kelley commented the City may want to limit parking along County Road 15 in the future, which should perhaps be looked at. Gappa stated City Staff will need to develop a lighting and parking lot plan prior to proceeding forward with the project. Gappa stated the lights should be installed prior to the paving. Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to direct City Staff to proceed forward with this project and develop a lighting and parking lot plan for the Navarre Municipal Parking Lot and contact the affected property owners regarding this project. VOTE; Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#16) LICENSES Flint stated he has concerns with the size of the garbage trucks currently being utilized on his road by Browning Ferry Industries. Flint stated his neighbors in the past have requested smaller size garbage trucks be utilized within the City since a majority of the roads are privately owned and maintained and are not built for that kind of weight. Flint stated he spoke with Browning Ferry approximately one year ago and requested smaller trucks, but to date nothing has changed. Flint inquired whether there were any other options available to the residents in this area. Kelley stated he and some of his neighbors use Blackovviak, who has smaller sized garbage trucks as well. He noted some of his neighbors currently do not object to the larger size trucks. Sansevere stated it was his understanding if another garbage hauler licensed within the City were called and requested to provide service to a certain part of the City, they have the option of providing that service. i ... H ' "•1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22,2000 (Licenses, Continued) Flint stated he will contact another garbage company to see whether a smaller sized garbage truck would be available for their neighborhood. Flint indicated he is not opposed to approving the four licenses being applied for. Flint moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the following licenses. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Garbage & Refuse Collector's License 1 . Craig Baldy Baldy Sanitation 5906 Henry Street Maple Plain, MN 55359 2. Frank Blackowiak Blackowiak & Son Sanitation & Rolloff Service 1 195 Sunnyfield Road North Mound, MN 55364 3. Douglas Hawkinson Cleanway Sanitation, Inc. P.O. Box 220 Long Lake, MN 55356 4. Donald Rachel Veit Container Corp dba Veit Disposal Systems 14000 Veit Place Rogers, MN 55374 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT Applicant; Matt Stewart Event: 4th of July Celebration Location; 1535 Bohns Point Road Date: July 4, 2000 Time: Noon - 10:00 p.m. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT, CONTINUED (#8) NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING FOR NARROWS DOCK LOTS (Flint excused himself from this matter) ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 i k r’ (Narrows Dock Lots, Continued) Gappa stated this item has appeared before the City Council on a couple ot previous occasions where concerns regarding parking along both sides of Shadywood Road were discussed. In June of 1999, the City installed "no parking" signs along both sides of Shadjwood Road north of the Narrows Bridge. These signs were installed because of safety concerns caused by vehicles parking in this area and concerns regarding safe access into the driveways in this area. Gappa stated the status of the easements has been uncertain in the past, with several options previously discussed for access to the dock lots. One possible discussed option was the construction of a new driveway entrance on the north side of the dock lots The existing entrance had always been off the private road along the south side of the dock lots. The space available for a new driveway on the north side is limited because of the steep topography. Obtaining the easements for this new driveway would also be very dilTicult. .Another option presented was allowing parking along the southernmost 100 feet ot the southbound shoulder area. Gappa noted there still is a safety concern from bicyclists moving out into traffic to pass the parked vehicles. Gappa indicated City Staff has since researched the easement issue further, with copies of the recorded easement documents being obtained from Hennepin County Gappa stated in 1955, numerous registered land surveys were done in this area, with a number of lots being created at that time. Gappa stated the dock lots are considered Torrens property rather than Abstract property. The Certificates of Title for these dock lots list easements that are recorded against the properties going back to 1955. Based upon City Staff review, it appears that road easements were granted to allow for access to the various properties. Gappa stated the easements diminish the need to consider changes to the current no parking area. Gappa noted the City has received numerous letters regarding the use of the dock lots and the conditional use permits that have been approved in this area. Gappa stated this hearing is intended to give the neighbors a chance to provide their input into this matter and what, if any, action the residents feel is necessary to address the issues regarding the dock lots Mayor Jabbour stated following a rather big event held on Big Island approximately one year ago, the City Council passed a resolution to eliminate parking along Shadywood Road. Jabbour stated the City has been requested by the dock owners to revisit the issue and reconsider the City's position. Jabbour noted since this issue was first discussed. City Staff has determined that easements in this area exist. Tom Barrett, City Attorney, reiterated that City Staff has looked at the easements in this area, noting a formal survey of this area could be conducted for approximately $500, which would outline all 38 lots and the cross easements. Barrett noted the City has not had a formal survey . \ * V t'f ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22,2000 (Narrows Dock Lots, Continued) of the area done at this time. Barrett stated until that survey is completed, the City has no formal title opinion. Mayor Jabbour commented the neighbors in this area are questioning the issue of parking, the use of the docks, and the rights of the dock owners. Jabbour stated he will make his packet of information concerning this matter available to any member of the public interested in reviewing it. Kelley commented if there are legal questions concerning this matter, he does not feel he would be in a position to answer those at this time. Mayor Jabbour stated the City Council would merely be listening to the input of the neighbors regarding this issue. Robin Cook, 680 West Hillside Drive, Wayzata, stated they own the dock located on Tract E. Cook inquired how the event on Big Island relates to no parking along Shadywood. Dick Ogle, 2771 Shadywood Road, stated the owner of Tract G moved a number of the people participating in the party on Big Island over to his residence, along with a number of boats. Mayor Jabbour stated that is the event he is referring to. Jim Zimmerman, 2745 Shadywood Road, stated the no parking in this area had existed prior to that event on Big Island. Cook commented she was unsure how that was relevant to the parking in this area Mayor Jabbour stated he is not sure whether it is relevant or not, and noted that some of the activity occurring in this area is not related to the docks. Jabbour stated photographs of the area reveal there is parking occurring by Tracts B and G, which appears to be causing some concerns. Cook inquired what the reason was for the elimination of the parking Mayor Jabbour stated the City Council noticed a problem with parking in this area and safety issues that existed. Jabbour stated based on the comments contained in the Public Works Director's report, it appears parking along that road probably would not have been permitted in the first place. Jabbour noted this is a county road, with the City of Orono typically not allowing parking along any of the other county roads within the City. Jabbour stated the City Council attempts to deal with these issues one at a time as the need arises Jabbour stated what currently ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 (Narrows Dock Lots, Continued) exists in this area is a legal non-conforming use and would not be allowed under the City's current regulations. Cook commented the residents in this area are still considered legal property owners and have certain rights regarding the use of their properties. Mayor Jabbour stated he is not in a position to give legal advice at this time, and suggested the resident contact her attorney regarding legal questions. George Olson, stated he is the father of Christopher Olson who owns Tracts M and N. Olson noted at the time the lot was purchased by his son a title search was conducted which showed that no easement exists for Tracts M and N. with some easements existing for some of the other lots. Mayor Jabbour stated in his view independent of the easements, it is difficult to park in this area. Ogle stated the previous Zoning Administrator for the City researched this whole issue, with a definite recommendation being made for no parking along this county road. Ogle stated he has been very cooperative with his neighbors and has not experienced any problems with parking in the area Ogle stated a problem has arisen when the people in the area own more than one car and there is not sufficient room on their lots to park their vehicles. Ogle stated the law is what i» is and should not be changed at this time. Zimmerman stated as the non-resident dock owners proceeded to acquire these properties, a number of issues arose regarding their rights. Zimmerman stated he has retained the services of an attorney to research these issues. Zimmerman stated according to the City documents that exist, they do address these issues very clearly, and the residents in this area were advised following the last meeting that only one car per lot would be allowed Zimmerman stated they are merely requesting that the property owners in this area follow the laws governing these issues. Don Meigal, 683 Sutherland Road. Columbia Heights, stated he is the owner of Tracts Q and R and attended the last meeting regarding this issue Meigal stated he asked the City Council to revisit this issue because in his mind he has a concern that if the property owner does not have an easement, he does not have parking Meigal commented the covenants should contain the easements Mayor Jabbour stated it is not the City's intention to become involved in the private affairs of the citizens. Jabbour stated the issues before them tonight involve defining the City's position on the permanency of the docks and the property owners' rights relating to the docks as well as « A ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 (Narrows Dock Lots, Continued) the parking. Jabbour stated obtaining an easement from a neighbor is up to that individual resident and not the City. Jabbour remarked that the City does not want to post every county road at this time as no parking, and if the road is posted no parking, the residents will need to find another place to park. Mayor Jabbour commented another concern before the City Council is the acquisition of one of the houses by a certain individual who likes to host numerous parties and the future acquisition of the other docks in this area. Zimmerman stated some of the residences on these lots have turned into weekend homes, which is a concern to the year-round residents in this area, as well as the number and size of the boats being parked at the docks. Mayor Jabbour stated the size and number of boats is outside the jurisdiction of the City. Kelley stated in his opinion the City should not change the no parking situation that currently exists in this area and should recognize that these docks do exist Mayor Jabbour reiterated his packet of information concerning this item is available for any resident to review. Kelley indicated he does not wish to go into Malkerson's opinions at this time. Sansevere stated he does not want to revisit the no parking issue at this time. Sansevere stated if the property owner only has room for one car, he then is only able to park one car in that area. Sansevere stated the City may need to look into people renting these docks and whether that is prevented by ordinance. Lili McMillan, LMCD Representative, stated the LMCD does have requirements regarding the length of the dock and the number of boats allowed to be parked at the dock. Ogle indicated he would be willing to work with the residents in the area in an attempt to resolve this issue. Tom Barrett, City Attorney, stated there appears to be a mix of things occurring; one, a conflict of private property rights and, two, the effort by the City to assist the property owners in coming to some type of regulatory conclusion that is acceptable to the residents. Barrett recommended the City only look at the regulatory issues and not the private conflict issues. Barrett noted the City has allowed these lots to be created by subdivision in the past and has allowed the docks to exist. . .i- ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 (Narrows Dock Lots, Continued) Mayor Jabbour stated in his view the City's formal position on these docks is that they are legally non-conforming. Barrett stated he is uncertain whether they are a legal non-conforming use. but would tend to view them as an accessory use without a principal structure, noting the use is not non- conforming in the sense that docks are allowed in residential areas Barrett stated the City has historically allowed the use of these docks to exist to date as an accessory use without a principal structure. Zimmerman inquired whether anyone has ever been denied access to their parking spot Meigal stated that's an issue he is concerned with. Ogle reiterated he would be willing to work with his neighbors to resolve this issue. Mayor Jabbour suggested Ogle head up the eflbrt among the neighbors to resolve these issues. Ogle stated he would be happy to do that. Ogle stated he is willing to cooperate with his neighbors. Meigal inquired whether Ogle was intending to draf\ an agreement that everyone should sign. Ogle stated he is unsure whether it is necessary to sign anything. Mayor Jabbour encouraged the neighbors to resolve this issue amongst themselves. Jabbour noted some of the neighbors have a concern that they will be denied parking or access to their properties, which should be addressed. Ogle stated to his knowledge no property owner has been denied parking or access to his property. Ogle commented a problem arises when the property owner attempts to park more than one car in the area. Mayor Jabbour commented if a person wants to have a two car garage, they will need to buy a piece of property which is large enough to accommodate that. Kelley commented he would like the neighbors to resolve this issue amongst themselves, with no action being necessary by the City Council. Gappa recommended the no parking signs be relocated to keep cars from parking within the tapered area Gappa staled the County installed the signs in the wrong location and currently I !> >1' ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 22, 2000 (Narrows Dock Lots, Continued) cars are able to park in the tapered area and near the fire hydrant. Gappa stated the signs should be relocated in order to comply with the City's Council's original intent. The Council agreed the signs should be relocated CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Tom Barrett, City Attorney, requested an executive session, *(#28) BILLS Sansevere moved, Flint seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 8:42 p.m. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor 't t 'I ■ Application Date: 4/19/99 Completion Date: 1/14/00 60 Day Deadline: 5/12/00 Waived Deadline Review Period CniiMr',! meeting JUN 1 2 2000 Cl IT or onuivO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed: DATE: 6/12/00 ITEM NO.: 3 Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:i/2486 Elaine Erickson 1270 Spruce Place Variances/CUP LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential (1 acre) 9,850 s.f. (.23 acre) List of Exhibits: A Resolution B Notice of Planning Commission Action C City Engineer Letter (Drainage Review Letter) D Minutes from Planning Commission (4/17/2000) E Staff Report and Exhibits of 4/17/2000 Overv iew: Property owners have proposed to tear down an existing residence and build a new residence further back on the property. The project involves moving the new residence back out of the 0-75' setback area, meeting the City standard and being more in alignment with adjacent properties. A Conditional Use Permit is required for grading within five feet of the property line. A variance is required for hardcover in the 75-250' setback area. No other variances are required for the proposed new residence. Applicants’ are required to submit engineered plans for any retaining walls that will be over 4' in height before issuance of a building permit. 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2): Hardcover in 75-250' Setback Area: To permit 2,647 s.f. (46.93%) where 1,682 s.f (27.58%) exists and 1,525 s.f (25%) is allowed. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 5 to 0 vote to: Approve the application as presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Applicant has worked diligently with staff and the Planning Commission throughout the past year and has made numerous revisions to the plan to minimize the number and magnitude of variances required. The current plan is acceptable to staff and the Planning Conunission, and staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or ath^nd the enclosed resolution. ^0 .it • V. '4 m 1 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 21 AND A VARIANCE TO SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16(L)(2) FILE NO. 2486 WHEREAS, Elaine E. Erickson, (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1270 Spruce Place within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 10, Saga Hill Revised, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a conditional use permit per Municipal Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 21 for grading within 5' of a lot line, and a variance from Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) to permit construction of a new residence allowing 2,647 s.f. (46.93%) of hardcover in the 75-250' setback area where 1,682 s.f (27.55S %) exists and 1,525 s.f. (25%) is allowed; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 17,2000, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2486. 2. This property is located in the LR-1B Zoning District, where 1 acre or 43,560 s.f is the minimum lot area. The property consists of approximately .23 acres or 9,850 s.f Page 1 of 6 ■ nil ■ l. (i i*■ki h'v fr ItK-i- 5»l %■ I '-4, 3. 5. 6. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 17, 2000 and recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. B. C. D. E. The proposed new residence will meet the required side setbacks of 10' on a lot that is 50 ’ in width, and will meet the required 75' lakeshore setback. The proposed improvement will result in an increase of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area to 2,647 s.f. (46.93%). It is not feasible to construct a 1,500 s.f. residence/attached garage on this small lot without exceeding the 25% hardcover allowance. The hardcover has been minimized to the greatest extent possible while still accommodating an attached garage. The structural coverage will increase from 1,150 s.f (11.3%) to 1,500 s.f (15%), meeting the structural coverage limits imposed by City Code. The improvement as proposed will not have a detrimental impact on the values of the surrounding residences. Th'* oroposed grading within 5' of the side lot lines will have no negative impa ts on adjacent properties. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 6 .rS X 7.The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow grading within 5’ of the property line not to be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 21 to allow grading within 5' of a lot line, and a variance from Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) to permit construction of a new residence allowing 2,647 s.f. (46.93%) of hardcover in the 75- 250' setback area where 1,682 s.f. (27.58 %) exists and 1,525 s.f. (25%) is allowed. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. Applicant’s contractor shall obtain the required demolition permits for the removal of the principal structure. Applicant shall submit plans of engineered retaining walls for review by City staff prior to issuance of building permit. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 12,2001). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 6 m b*f :/> K n 6.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of June, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of June, 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 i 4 I If.-y - ,i •iJi. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of,2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this__________day of ____., 2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 1 i k V ¥ •a bk... Exhibit A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR KEN &: ELAINE ERICKSON OF LOT 2. BLOCK 10, SAGA HILL REVISED HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA itCJkc or prti«scs til j. la "Vfcr* c«. tNt tH# •• #*• •»» c*«<r«td '•vl IM «l 9* »*n* «n« !^««« llW««on. ««« tfw ffg#o»^ io<ui4i» <% pt^%04 *w>«M ♦*•«•!» IMrtO^ H «•* Pt0P«0* l« •'» • . J»^i9« «w |MI*1 •f*'**#^ ■#•! n»# r» t«« ««••* mi 4«A*I9« »**#Jr* %•» •••«• ••>»i9ki| tpM0^ y>0. «v««ar« «9*i W«d ,TrA—» m«. ««••» it»« 4s««#« 9« t4«9«l wC9<* **« •alii9*« ^ $4f* • II • #••• IJ ............ » » a«*i^OArt UU*#ro*/woDiu f« rLAUDPDr lur ««4au« €*••#» **•* iPCir<Ai«i^ ca Ama*••» yc»^e if «a oa iao» •* rae>.* %0€p<^p>*^ CurrlH ft CKUtloCKVii inu M fVMtJl I mO aiMTfltt. VC PImKIS iMt 1 M * 0U( lCt-*li »iMl\»e9MC CM#4i» M» tM< Trra-rr UMHOi a«i» ►•€ U*t OP *• iu^ • ««ev(A rri/ w itmtMiar AH»U. i®c iMC ir» »»»4CCS r<4>ta ^1^ 4I2-4I1-4UI A.ra *m iCX^V ••*«■ .uJLZfJl------- U»ll r-KT t^c 3/70/001 A't MO 00072 00-011 Page 6 of 6 i . |!' . •i. T-, I , ' t r' 4 t' w ;i"' \ ■ y ■'.’ I • b CITY OF ORONO ZONING FILE # 2486 b P.O. Box 66 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSIONrCrystal Bay, MN 55323 ACTION 1 .C- ■ 612-249-4600 DATE OF NOTICE; 4/18/2000 H*'TO; Elaine Erickson COPIES: A1 Hirsch Construction 1270 Spruce Place Mound, MN 55364 Box 633 Delano, MN 55328 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance/CUP DATE OF MEETING 4/17/2000 VOTE; 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approved with conditions: Additional information is requested, as follows: Drainage Calculations and map (pre and post), well placement, sketch of terracing wall if under .S’ W feet, if above feet engineered retaining wall and easement agreements from adjacent property owners. Applicant's next meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the May 22,2000 City Council meeting is April 28,2000. You will be notified by mail of the meeting date and time. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. w -1. - S'-. 1‘f r. »" i » ' '1 m I Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik& |\ \ Associates Engineers & Architects Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderfik jind Associates. Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Cqual Opportuniiy Employer and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G Bonesifoo. PE • M.irvin L Sorval.i PE • Glenn R Cook. PE • Robert G SchuP'Chi. PE • Jc"”/ A Bourdon. PE c Senior Consultants: Robert W Rosene. PE • Joseph C Anderiik P£ • Richard E Turner. PE • Su'.ar ' * ^'"erlin C PA Associate Principals Hov^ard A Sanford. PE • Ke«Th A. Gordon PE • Robert R Pfef?er»e. PE • RicP‘rd W Foster. P£ • Da.dO PE • C Ru::r' A* A • \* »rv a • Michael T Rautmann. P£ • Ted K Field. PE • Kenneth ? Anderson. PE • Mark R Rolfs. P£ • Oavid A Bonestroo V3A • S P 'A'*r«».or PE l.S • 'nras M Rirq VBA • A»!an RicK Sc'*m*c^r PF May 19. 2000 Offices: Si Paul. St CloucJ. Rochester and Wilfmar MN • Vliiw.-uivec Wi M^bsUe: wwwbonesiroocom Wendy Bottenberg Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Cry stal Bay. MN 55323 .V; V Re:Elaine Erickson Site Plan File No. 139-2486 Dear Wendy: We have reviewed the revised drainage area map and calculations for the proposed improvements on the Erickson property. The site is located at 1270 Spruce Place in the sollthwe^l quarter of Section 8. We have the following comments in regards to engineering mutters. The revised drainage area map and calculations appear to be acceptable. The re-grading of the site will send approximately 0.06 acres of drainage area to the swale north of Elaine Erickson’s daughters house. This re .suits in an increase of 0.16 cfs of storm water routed through this swale during a 100-year storm event. This anoimt of additional runoff is relatively insignificant. Propo ed grading, wall removal and wall construction is shown right up to the north and south lot lines. This nas created problems between neighbors in other parts of the City. We recommend that easements from the affected property owners be acquired prior to any grading activity. Silt fence should installed prior to any grading and remain in place until vegetation has been established. Details for the proposed new retaining walls should be submitted for review. Please contact me at (651) 604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 - Fax; 651-636-1311 j DRAFT ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 17, 2000 l ■■■' : t ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present; Chair Elizabeth Hawn, Commissioners Daniel Kluth, William Stoddard. Dale Lindquist. Jay Nygard. and Janice Berg. Commissioners Daniel Kluth and Sandra Smith were absent. The follov/ing represented City Staff; Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron. and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, City Council Members Bob Sansevere and Barb Peterson were present. Chair Elizabeth Hawn called the meeting to order at 6;30 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS OLD BUSINESS______________________________________________________________ (#1) #2486 ELAINE ERICKSON, 1270 SPRUCE PLACE - VARIANCES, 6:31 p.m. - 6:46 p.m. Elaine Erickson. Applicant. Nancy Anderson, Daughter, and Jeff Olson. Son. and Al Hirsch. Contractor, were present. Bottenberg stated the Applicants appeared before the Planning Commission at their February 14. 2000 meeting where the application was tabled to allow the Applicants time to redesign and move the proposed residence to conform more with Orono's zoning code. The Applicants have submitted revised plans which eliminates the need for a hardcover variance In the 0-75’ setback area, a variance to lot coverage and the conditional use permit. A variance is still required for hardcover in the 75-250' setback area. The proposed residence and deck have been relocated outside of the 0-75* setback area. Bottenberg noted the walkway and steps in the 0-75' setback area will remain, which will keep the hardcover at the existing amount. Bottenberg stated the proposed residence and garage consist of 1,499.5 square feet, which is slightly smaller than originally proposed, with the second story deck having been moved to the lower level. The proposed changes keep the residence under the allowed 1,500 square feet and eliminates the need for a variance to lot coverage. Bottenberg stated a variance to hardcover in the 75*250 ’ setback area is need required to allow 46.93 percent hardcover in this area, with existing hardcover in this area being 27.58 percent. With 25 percent being allowed. Nancy Anderson stated they are trying to accomplish this project in accordance with Orono's codes as much as possible. Erickson requested that she be allowed to construct a small deck on the proposed residence. Erickson commented she has lived in the existing home for the past 25 years and would like to continue to enjoy her view of the lake. Erickson stated they have scaled down the house as much as possible, noting she is not able to walk up and down stairs which necessitates the . . •-< ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 17, 2000 (#2486 Elaine Erickson, Continued) need for a one-level home. Anderson commented her mother did have polio as a child. Hawn inquired whether a conditional use permit is still needed for grading within five feet of the property lines. Bottenberg stated a conditional use permit is still required for the grading. Hawn Inquired whether there was any further information regarding the removal of a wall. Anderson stated they have not really addressed that issue, noting that the block wall exists along the property line and is partially covered with dirt. Anderson stated the neighbors are waiting to see what happens with this application prior to commencing any work on their property. Anderson stated in her view she does not anticipate the neighbors would be opposed to grading in the area of the property line. Anderson noted the neighbors are currently in Florida. Lindquist inquired whether the deck would be constructed on the lower level. Bottenberg indicated the proposed deck is to be constructed on the lower level of the house. Hawn noted the Planning Commission is generally very strict in enforcing its structural coverage limits. Anderson commented they have reduced the house as much as possible, with the goal of the project to provide one-floor living for her mother. Stoddard noted there were some issues of concern raised by City Staff. Hawn inquired whether the Applicant has a problem with relocation of the well. Anderson stated they do not. Anderson stated the sheds will be removed as well, Hav/n noted this is a small, strangely configured lot. Hawn indicated the reasoning behind the limit on the structural coverage was to help protect the lakeshore and runoff into the lake, which sometimes creates hardships for the property owners. Lindquist inquired whether the Applicant was aware of the issues of concern outlined in the Planner's Report. Anderson stated she was. Hawn stated they will need the consent of the adjoining neighbor in order for the conditional use permit to be approved. Anderson stated in her view the neighbors are in agreement that some grading work needs to be completed in that area in order to address the drainage problems currently being experienced. There were no public comments regarding this application. Lindquist stated he would not have a problem making approval subject to the conditions outlined Pa;ic 2 D ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 17, 2000 (#2486 Elaine Erickson. Continued) In the Planner's Report. Weinberger stated typically the Applicant needs to submit drainage and grading plans for this property for review and approval by the City Engineer. Anderson commented the application process has been an expensive one. Anderson stated the drainage currently is a problem and anything would be an improvement over what currently exists. Anderson noted they will take the appropriate steps to comply with the conditions. Hawfi stated the City would like to see the Applicant achieve the best results possible with the improvements made to the drainage. Weinberger recommended the Applicant work v/ith their own engineer regarding the drainage and graa..'.g. with their plans being submitted to the City Engineer for his review and approval. Anderson stated they will comply with the conditions requested by the City. Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2486, Elaine Erickson, 1270 Spruce Place, granting of a variance to hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback area and a conditional use permit to allow grading within five feet of the prooerty line, and further subject to the five conditions outlined In the April 17, 2000 P .;ii»er’s Report, with the grading and drainage plans being submitted and approved by tne City Engineer prior to the Applicant appearing before the City Council. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. !2) #2513 CONNIE PIEPHO, 540 NORTH ARM DRIVE - VARIANCES. 6:47 p.m. - 6:59 p.m. Connie^epho. Applicant, and Mike Mulvany. Contractor, were present. Weinberger stated the Applicant has appeared twice before the Planning Commission with a request to construbK^ inground swimming pool within the average lakeshore setback. The pool could not be placed orHltie property without relocating a future septic drainfield site. The septic site would be required to be sW^d 30 feet to the north, which results in the site being located within 75* of the water supply v/ell on ama<liacent property. The Applicants were requested to revise the plan and find an alternative site for thejjqd. The second plan proposed to have the pool located on the other side of the property. However/bityStaff had some concerns about the location of the pool in this area due to the close proximity to the^^jacent residence. The Planning Commission tabled that proposal to allow the Applicant and the adjac^t>Loroperty owner time to discuss their options further. Weinberger stated the plan before the Planning Comrhi^ion tonight is proposing to locate the pool as reflected in their first proposal, which allows the Applicants two options. Option one is to enter into an agreement v/ith the adjacent property owners that woultk^equire the Applicant to pay to relocate the neighbor's well should it become necessary to repiac^St^ septic to the alternate site. This would be accomplished by having money being placed in escrowTqrelocate the well. This agreement is acceptable to both parties. ^ Weinberger stated the second option available to the parties is for the City of Ordtv^to grant a variance to the septic code and permit a drainfield site to be located less than 75 ’ frortvtj^ neighbor’s well but not less than the State requirement of 50'. Weinberger stated the affected prop^ owner will need to be contacted regarding this option prior to a variance being issued. Pa^c 3 .. - — ----------ih t ^ /k... . c.Ik: / i TO: h'’ • i FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning AdministratonTlanner April 17, 2000 #2486 Elaine Erickson 1270 Spruce Place Variance — Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB 9,850 s.f. One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) (.23 acre) Exhibits A B C Application Applicants Letter Existing Site Plan/Survey C (1) Proposed Site Plan/Survey D Elevations/Floor Plans Revised Hardcover calculations City Engineer Comments Location Map Planning Commission Minutes (February 23,2000) Staff Report (February 14,2000) including application, survey, etc. E F G H 1 Summary: This application was tabled at the February 14,2000 Planning Commission meeting so the applicant could redesign and move the proposed residence to conform more with Orono ’s zoning code. The applicant is requesting variances to tear down an existing residence and build a new residence further back on the same lot. The project involves moving the new residence back out of the 0-75' setback area to be more in alignment with adjacent properties. The application presented at the February 14, 2000 Planning Commission meeting included a conditional use permit to allow removing the “bulge”on the lakeside of the residence. The grading and altering of the lakeside land is no longer being proposed. The applicants have made changes that eliminate the need for a hardcover variance in the 0-75* setback area variance, lot coverage variance and conditional use permit, however they still require a variance for hardcover in the 75-250’ setback area. H2486 Elaine Erickson I2~0 Spruce Place Variance 4/17/2000 Page 1 y k r : k-7 Brief Summary of proposed changes: • Hardcover in 0-75* setback area: The proposed residence and deck have been moved back out of the 0-75' setback area. Walkway and steps to the lake will remain, therefore the hardcover in this setback area is not changing. No variance needed. • Lot coverage: The proposed house and garage square footage is 1,499.5 square feet. The second story deck has been moved to the lower level and the proposed residence is slightly smaller, keeping lot coverage under the allowed 1,500 square feet. No variance needed. • Hardcover in the 75-250' setback area: The proposed residence and deck have been reduced from the prior application reducing the amount of hardcover in this setback area. The proposed hardcover is 2,647 s.f. (46.93%), existing hardcover (residence currently on the property) isl ,682 s.f. (27.58%), and 1,525 s.f. (25%) is allowed. Variance is still needed for hardcover in the 75-250' setback area. • Topographic Alteration/Grading and Filling: The conditional use permit to remove the "bulge ” in the topography to bring the lakeside of the lot more natural in flow with the adjacent properties is no longer being proposed. No Conditional Use Permit needed. This application requires the following variance: Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2): Hardcover in 75-250' setback area: To allow 2,647 s.f. (46.93%) of hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback, where 1,682 s.f (27.58%) exists, and 1,525 s.f (25%) is allowed. ANALYSIS The "existing ” in these tables is the reside ”currently on the property, "Proposed ” is the new residence the applicant is requesting a vari:i.]icc to build. Lot Area: LR-IB Lot Area Lot Width Lakeshore yard Side yard Street yard Required 43,560 s.f 140'75'10'30’ Existing 9,850 s.f 50'50'8.7’ (north) 9' (south) 80’ Proposed 9,850 s.f 50'50'11.2'45' fi2485 Elaine Erickson 1270 Spruce Place Variance 4/17/2000 Page 2 ** I ■ iv ■h ’ Structural Coverage ; Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 9,850 s.f.Allowed: 1,477.5 s f. (15%) or 1,500 s.f Existing: L150 o.f (11 ^/o) ipal Proposed: 1,499.5 s.f ^ The structural coverage is under the allowed amount of 1,500 s.f. for a lot under 10,000 s.f. Hardcover Calculations : Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing hardcover Proposed hardcover 0-75'3,750 s.f 0 s.f (0%)533.2 s.f (14.21%)136 s.f (3.67%) 75-250'6,100 s.f 1,525 s.f (25%)1,682 s.f (27.58%)2,647 s.f (46.93%) 1 -1 Existing vs Proposed House 978 s.f 1,499.5 s.f w/garage 2 sheds 129 s.f 0 s.f Driveway 462 s.f 800 s.f The proposed hardcover calculations are more than what currently exists because the house is larger than what exists, has an attached garage, and a larger driveway. Statement of Hardship: The t^)plicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Staff Dbcussion; The City engineer reviewed the grading and drainage plan, the comments are Exhibit F. The only issue of real concern is the drainage runoff. Drainage calculations and a drainage area map should be submitted for review to ensure the water is diverted to the street and into adjacent neighbors yards. The other concern is the retaining wall. It should be an engineered design and submitted for review before final approval by the City Council. ii2486 Elaine Erickson 1270 Spruce Place Variance 4/17/2000 Page 3 3^'^ r- - ■’* - A . r- 'll’. ( ' ?■ Issues of Concern: 1. The applicant is aware that the well will have to be moved. If it is kept in its current location, it will be underneath the new residence. 2. The sheds on the property should be removed. 3. Drainage calculations and a drainage area map should be submitted prior to City Council approval. 4. The retaining wall should be an engineered design and submitted for review prior to City Council approval. 5. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. StatT Recommendation: Staff makes the following recommendations: The variance for hardcover in the 75-250' setback area be apprcjN'cd with the condition that drainage calculations, drainage area map and an engineer de v^^gnc'd ret aining wall be submitted for review and approved by City staff prior to City Council fcvir>t A ^2486 Elaine Erickson 1270 Spruce Place Variance 4/17/2000 Page 4 4 i:- Application # ^ Date Receiv^~~ V// f /f ^ Amount Paid ^ 30 C '-^2T CrTY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S2S0.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION She Address r V c t p c r Property Identification Number fP.I.D.1 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired,(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of propertj' X residential ___pother (specify). Zomng District: LiQ - in ________________________ APPLICANT Name /rJ A/1 r < U C c FO Address: ?> .t y 6 ^ ^ Phone (home ) J ^ ____ Phone (work)_______________ City: y.. J., n-m Zip: % OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ^ IF-A f>i c/r < n Address: __________________City:, Phone (home) Phone (work). .. Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: a i~A /"•'.■ t-fv — f. h t k —uJ a h i /c A A/C-Jij htin^ r> ri I'll '<yjtf c e_________^ (attach additional sheets if necessaiy) ^ r e p ^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: ___Lot Width Front I C.^7 Side Y Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage 81 * Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual properW conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: \)u-c. ti P\r^c:/th__C^ nrl(T?e — Chilli: ^ n i /t h If! U nj<r‘/T—T jl ---rhf:..£:2L — »T n 4 ^ /:] n yV^»Y - 'T’n /*,/?n i' C- cr hi n------c* r:,/J Ji C.U^.—Ic' /i r?-— fattach additional sheets if nece:if necessary) I, Nancy Anderson, am writing on behalf of my mother, Elaine Erickson. My parents have been residents of Orono for over 35 years. In 1979, in anticipation of my father s retirement, they purchased a small old home (1270 Spruce Place) next door to me. Their plan was to rent it until the day came when they felt they could not handle the upkeep of their big home and then to build a new, easy to maintain, home on this property. They began the process of building in early 1998 by contacting a builder who had just finished building a "retirement" home on Spruce Place. Their directive was to design a small home with all needs for an older couple on one floor with an additional bedroom and family space in the lower, walkout, level. When the plan was finished they approached Orono and began the process of securing the permission to build. There were many problems with the lot and the plan....size, elevation, set backs. They, with the help of their builder, redid plans and surveys and consulted several times with Orono employees. t By the fall of 1998 they had committed to full speed ahead to build in the summer of 1999. My Dad died, unexpectedly, in the Spring of 1999. The new, small house is an absolute necessity now. From the first meetings with various Orono employees, we have made it our goal to comply with the rules and regulations as best we can. There are several overriding problems with the lot that make this application for the altering of the land a necessity. The first and foremost problem Is the unnatural contour of the lakeside as it compares to the neighboring properties. A second issue is one of drainage and placement of the house in relation to the street. We are requesting the removal of the “bulge" (dirt) in the topography and removal of one tree on the lake side. This will bring the lot in flow with the lots on the north and south and will allow the house to walk out on the northeast corner. It will allow the lower level to have a family space and a bedroom. This change will also allow the level of the garage to stay at an acceptable level to the street for drainage reasons. The final consideration is that this seems to really be the pn|y solution to providing for acceptable drainage for the neighboring properties. Please be advised that there is no question about replacing trees and planting lots of bushes and shrubs. My mother is a hardy gardener and a nature lover (other than geese!). We have already discussed, at length, what pines spruce etc can be planted to recreate a “woodsy" feel to the lot. We have had discussions with all of our neighbors and without an exception they are supportive of our plans. We are including the signatures of the near north and south neighbors who have reviewed our plans. “A V' V We are including photos for your information. I* ■S iz 80 S,r U-CS2.h PI. i BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY FORi /fet/ ^ 10' thiSX J?*? <V^'izl z§ ^ -N* V V <or^- i-t /t^.3 /r)^ CP« \iiJ^ '2A f10, h AoT Z Bloc/C /O s/i3/=) yUL ee\r/s^D .. • EeyjccC r eyr ff C. EMO\h\C~ ■ i ip rTi ^ * Ir 94 f 9 \ ifl) O - IRON MON. SET□ - WOOD STAKE PLACED B.M. - BEARINGS ON PROPOSED INFORMATION ASSUMED DATUM ________1st FLOOR ELEV. BASEMENT ELEV. IRON MON. INPLACE GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. TOP BLOCK ELEV. DRAINAGE 000.0 « EXIST. ELEV. (oOO.o)'PROPOSED ELEV. EXIST. & PROP. ELEV. SCHOBORQ LAND SURVEYING INC. anr oy. m ta sc I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Mlnnesotj JOB 477£^ Book - Page ,y Date:A/ai/. X Registration No. 147C0 Scale /"^30 I I 1 •3 9 W I'-t I • • ••.** •. • .. ' : -. .‘V , ■ V • • i- ••■' msommTussz • j t. [■ r im 0^" > t ^ } i» f'- habdcover ^75-250 ^ ^ I—U* 500-1000 ’ S.F. (5 6'ta) £2 A. House Width Len|lh X X X B. Oar«E« C: Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. p»tio/Dcck X X F. L~“dscape Vr.icrlain ty Plastic Or Fabric X X X X 0. Other total hardcover IH A-------------------- A. House Length X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk — // Jy fCIL X X E. Palid X X F. Landscape Undcrl^ By Plastic Or Fabric X X X SI s SF. S.F. S.F. SF. s sa SF. SF. SF. SF. s 8 SF. SF. SF. SF. SF. S.F. SF. A SF. B xlOO ^£25^S.F Width n s SF. SF. ^-SF. SF. / 72.5SF.-2gns.F. SF. SF. SF. X2-S.^ G. Other --------- TOTAI. HARDCO'rtR w WNE total PROPERTY WiEA IN ZOl«^ A __2Xi2 ---- xlOO ^ • • * * Qjic'd 3/311^00 ii;, • ■ '■; A i SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) C mE>75-250'250-500' yyisTiNG ^ A. House_____________ Lngih X X X B. Oarage C* Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Palio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A -- - - ® A. House Lcnflh X X X B. Oarage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk E. PatioADcck _ X X X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other Width total hardcover in ZONE PERT\ ‘ ■" jlI£- s s xlOO Width TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ^ o -y x 100 = 500-1000’ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F; S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.?. S.F. S.F. SJ. SJ. % A B S.F. S.F. 'S.F. ■*S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 13.S.F. -------S.F. S.F. S.F. SE. S.F. S.F. S.F. t- /36 _SF. A S.F. B a ig -7 J*/" 4 m m L- ' k ‘ vL- Bonestroo. Rotene. Anderlik and Aitociaces. Inc. If an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G Boneilroo, PE • Marvin L Sorvaia. PE • Glenn f? Cook. PE • Rotjeri G Schunicht. PE • Jerry A Bourdon. PE Senior Consultants: Robert W Roiene PE • Joseph C Anderhk. PE • Richard E Turner PE • Susan M Ebcrim. C PA Associate Principals; Howard A Sanford. PE • Keith A Gordon. PE • Robert R Pfefferfe. PE • Richard W Foster PE • David O Loskota PE • Robert C Russek. Ai A • Mark A Hanson. PE • Michael T R.«ufmann, **£ • Ted K Field PE • Kenneth P Anderson PE • Mark R Rolfs. PE • Oavid A Bonestroo. MB A • Sidney P Williamson. PELS • Agnes M Ring. MBA* Allan Rick Schrnid:. PE Offices: St Paul. St Cloud. Rochester and Wiilmar MN • Milwaukee, Wi VX^bsite: a .% ,v bonestroo com ^=jS l^osene ^ S Anderlik & \ Associates Engineers & Architects April 10. 2000 Wendy Bottenberg Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Elaine Erickson Site Plan File No. 139-2486 Dear Wendy: We have reviewed the site plan for the proposed improvements on the Erickson property. The site is located at 1270 Spruce Place in the southwest quarter of Section 8. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. • The proposed gravel driveway is shown at a grade of about 3.6^^. This appears acceptable, we recommend that the driveway be paved with bituminous or concrete to minimize erosion. The proposed curb and gutter should be concrete. • Proposed grading is shown right up to the north and south lot lines. This has created problems between neighbors in other parts of the City. We recommend that easements from the affected property owners be acquired prior to any grading activity. Silt fence should be shown on the plans and be in place prior to any grading. • A drainage area map and drainage calculations should be submitted for review. It appears that the drainage boundaries are being revised, with more water being diverted to the street. The grading plan and drainage area map should be enlarged to show the swale where the water will be routed to the lake. The proposed runoff routed through this swale should not be increased from existing conditions. • The proposed retaining wall removal north of the north lot line shows no grading. It is unclear how this will be accomplished, plans should show the appropriate grading necessary for the wall removal. The proposed new retaining wall will require that wall details and an engineered design be submitted for review. Please contact me at (651) 604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, bonestroo ' ROSENE, anderlik & ASSOCIATES, INC. /oyyf Tom Kellogg v; Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 - St. Paul. MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 > Fax: 651-636-1311 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23. 2000 (#2558 Anthony Patterson. Continued) 15.7 percent. Patt-:r3on stated he will reduce the side entry if necessary. Kluth commented he would like to see the numbers for ha the existing numbers. Hawn inquired why stmctural coverage increases^ he deck is being reduced. Hawn stated the consensus of the Planning Commission is to leave the structupdf coverage at the existing 15.7 percent Nygard indicated the Applicant will need to remove 43 square feet inpraer to reduce the proposed structural coverage to 15.7 percent. Nygard Inquired whether the^ldveway should be removed. ver and structural coverage kept at Bergman stated the driveway was part of thp^rtginal proposal and apparently has not been removed from the calculations. Kluth stated they need to get the application. ect hardcover and structural coverage numbers on this Hawn commented it appeafs the hardcover is less than 43.7 percent. Kluth stated he wo^kflike some assurance from the Applicant that the existing hardcover and structural coverage limits will not be increased. Kluth stated the Applicant will need to calculate the correct nurfmers prior to appearing before the City Council. Kluttyrt^ed. Hawn seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2558, Anthony Pajt^on, 1780 Shadywood Road, granting of variances to lot coverage, and side yard ;^ack, with the understanding that all existing hardcover and structural coverage limits will not be exceeded, and subject to the submittal of a new survey showing the revisions to City Staff for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS (#5) #2486 ELAINE ERICKSON. 1270 SPRUCE PLACE - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:38 p.m. - 8:26 p.m. Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Nancy Anderson. Daughter. Jeff Olson. Son. and Al Hirsch, Contractor, were present. The Applicant was not present. Bottenberg slated the Applicant is requesting variances to remove an existing residence and build a new residence further back on the same lot. The Applicant is also applying for a conditional use permit to permit grading within 75 feet of the lakeshore. The Applicant is proposing to remove a "bulge* in the topography to bring the lakeside of the lot more In natural flow with the adjacent property. The proposal includes relocating the new residence back out of the 0-75' setback area, which will allow it to be more in alignment with the adjacent properties. Bottenberg stated the Applicant initiated this process in April of 1999. when the Applicant brought Page 7 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000 (#2486 Elaine Erickson, Continued) in the first set of house plans. The Applicant has submitted several sets of revised plans, with the latest set of plans calling for the elimination of the side yard setback. The Applicant is requeuing variances to lot coverage and hardcover coverage in the 0-75' and 75-250 setback areas, with a conditional use permit still being necessary. The bulge that the Applicant is seeking to remove occurred in 1975. when the owner of the adjacent property did some grading work on his property and a walkout was created. Bottenberg stated since that time, the City has denied a number of requests for similar grading »o create walkout ^tuations when t'^ey involved excavating in the 0-75* zone. The Applicants havu been advised by Orono s building inspector that one option to correct the incorrect grading on the adjoining property womp be to remove the trees and level it out to flow more with the other properties. Bottenberg stated this option, however, would be inconsistent with the zoning code and with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Bottenberg indicated the Applicant will need to relocate the existing well should this plan be approved since it will be located underneath the new residence. Bottenberg stated the Applicant is proposing total structural coverage in the amount of 1 ^84 square feet, or 16 percent, where 15 percent is permitted, and hardcover in the 0-75 setback of 5.84 percent where 0 percent hardcover is allowed. The Applicant is also proposing hardcover in the 75-250' setback of 48.6 percent, where 25 percent is allowed. Bottenberg stated the hardcover variance in the 0-75' setback area will be reduced to 0 percent if grading is permitted and the proposed 'esidence and deck are relocated further back on the lot out of the 0-75 setback area. Bottenberg noted if grading is permitted, the sidewalk and steps will no longer be needed. City Staff is recommending denial of the conditional use permit to permit gradim or excavating within 75' of the lakeshore due to conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Nancy Anderson stated the biggest issue they are faced with is attempting to construct a single-story handicapped accessible residence to meet her mother's needs. Anderson cornmented they p^ve attempted to reduce the size of the residence as much as they feel is economically feasible in order to retain its resale value. Anderson stated it is difficult to find a suitable building pad which will meet all of the City's requirements, noting they would like to do some grading on the lot in order to correct the drainage on the lot and to make the lot flatter. Jeff Olson stated he personally is not in fav/or of altering the lakeshore. but in his opinion some action needs to be taken in order to correct the drainage and remove the bulge that was created from some previous grading work that was completed on the adjoining property. Olson stated his mother would like to construct this new residence so her daughter, who lives next door, will be able to take care of her. Hawn stated the Planning Commission will need to address in further detail what the Applicants are proposing for the lakeshore side of the property. Hirsch stated they would like to remove some dirt to create a walkout to the north. Hawn stated typically the Planning Commission does not allow grading within 75 of the lakeshore and the Planning Commission cannot grant a conditional use pennit to allow grading in that area simply because some incorrect grading has occurred on the adjoining property. Hawn ac^nwledged some incorrect drainage does currently exist on this property, which should be addressed. Hawn stated ideally it would be better to correct the grade on the adjoining pioperty, but due to the lack of an engineer's report, the Planning Commission is not ab'e to determine what ideally should be done Page 8 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000 ns, with the requesting 3as, with a f the adjacent g stated since ut situations by Orono ’s jerty would be I stated this an be if 1,584 setback of hardcover in the hardcover and the :back area. ided. ‘xcavating ct a single-story id they have easible in order which will meet order to correct nion some was created from ated his mother be able to take (Applicants are the lakeshore 9 in that area m acknowledged essed. Hawn ue to the lack of I should be done r (#2486 Elaine Erickson, Continued) to correct the drainage. Hawn noted the Planning Commission typically does not approve walkouts near the lakeshore. Hawn acknowledged the tree in the location of the bulge has been damaged, which should also be addressed. Hawn noted the Planning Commission typically does not permit structural coverage to exceed the allowable 15 percent. Hawn stated the deck would be considered hardcover versus structural coverage if the proposed residence was a two-story structure. Kluth stated he would like tc separate what appear to be aesthetic concerns versus hardships that exist due to the topography of the land. Kluth commented he is in agreement with Hawn and that some action should be taken to correct the incorrect drainage that has occurred as a result of the grading on the adjoining property. Kluth stated he would like City Staff to continue working with the Applicants to see if some resolution could be reached to these issues. Anderson stated a walkout could still be created without the bulge being removed. Anderson stated they are in agreement that something needs to be done with the damaged tree. Hrwn inquired wheuier additional fill could be put near the tree. Anderson stated If additional fill were placed in that area, it would block the neighbor's view of the la*'.3. which was one reason why the grading was completed. Anderson stated the house could perhaps be moved further back out of the 0-75' setback, and suggested that the grade between her mother's house and her house be altered to help correct the drainage in that area. Hawn inquired whether that would eliminate the need for a retaining wall. Anderson stated it would. Hawn stated the Fianning Commission needs some direction from an engineer as it relates to the excavation and the impact to drainage that any grading work would do to this property as well as the adjoining properties. Kluth commented he has concerns regarding the grading and drainage. Kluth suggested the parties s.'^eak to City Staff regarding the removal of the damaged tree. Hawn stated the City’s forester should perhaps take a look at the situation before the tree is removed. Hawn stated she would not be opposed to a small amount of grading on this property, tut noted the overall grading and drainage issues need to be further addressed before any approval can be given. Anderson stated they are merely requesting the right to level the land in this area. Hawn reiterated that an engineer will need to review the situation and submit his recommendations to City Staff. Weinberger stated the City Engineer can review this situation and how it will affect the lakeshore. Weinberger commented the City wants to protect the natural environment as much as possible. Nygard acknowledged there appears to be a major drainage issue which needs to be addressed. Hawn stated the Applicant will need to show how much grading will occur, where the grading \will occur, and how much dirt will be moved. Page 9 ■m ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000 (#2486 Elaine Erickson, Continued) Hawn stated the Applicant needs to address the drainage concerns and reduce structural coverage, Hawn indicated she does not have a problem with an attached garage. Kluth commented the driveway is not a major issue in his opinion. Hawn remarked the Applicant may have some issues with snow removal as well, Anderson commented the not constructed as it was originally platted and stiould be located further uphill. Weinberger stated the City Engineer can review the drainage and grading plans prepared by the Applicant's engineer and make whatever recommendations are necessary. Weinberger noted the City Engineer normally does not go out and review the site. Gaffron pointed out it would be hard to tell the viability of the tree at this time of year, and suggested the Applicant hire a tree service to look at the tree and make some recommendations on what should be done. Hawn suggested the application be tabled. Anderson requested the matter be tabled. Hawn moved, Kluth seconded, to table Application #2486, Elaine Erickson, 1270 Spruce Place, to allow the Applicant time to revise their plans, submit a grading and drainage plan, and to address the issues with the damaged tree. Gaffron inquired whether the Applicant will be allowed to keep the structural coverage at the proposed 16 percent. Hawn stated the Planning Commission typically does not allow structural coverage to exceed the allowable 15 percent. Hawn stated it is hard to determine the exact amount of hardcover being proposed at this time, which will need to be recalculated. Gaffron suggested the Applicant lower the deck below six feet so it will not be counted as structural coverage. There were no public comments regarding this application. VOTE ON THE ABOVE MOTION: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (#6)i9 GILBERT GEHLE, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD - VARIANCES, 8:28 p.m. -9:15 p.m. The Certificate of MaTlIno-a'id Affidavit of Publication were noted. Gilbert Gehle, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting hardcdvenyariances to permit hardcover in excess of 25 percent within the 75-250’ lakeshore setback and to perrnirhacqcoyer within 75' of the south lakeshore. A variance is also required to permit a small amount of regradkiawithin the south 0-75’ lakeshore setback for a driveway. Page 10 \ s TO:Chair Havn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:February 14,2000 SUBJECT:#2486 Elaine Erickson 1270 Spruce Place Variance/Conditional Use Permit — Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) Lot Area:9,850 s.f. (.23 acre) List of Exhibits A B C C(l) D E F G H I J K Variance/CUP Applications Applicant ’s letter Existing Site Plan/Survey Proposed Site Plan/Survey Site Plan Elevations//Floor Plan Hardcover Calculations Inspector ’s Memo Photos of Bulge Plat Map Location Map Property Owner ’s List Permit Record Pertinent Code Sections I. Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C)-Lot Coverage-In all zoning districts, for all lots of 0-1.99 acre in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the lot area but no less than 1,500 square feet if area is less than 10,000 s.f. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(1): Hardcover in the 0-75' Setback Area: Within 75 feet of shoreline there shall be no excavating, filling, hardcover, temporar>' or permanent structures. 3. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(2): Hardcover in 75-250' Setback Area: Within 75-250* of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. U24S6 Elaine Erickson 1270 Spruce Place Variance/Conditional Use Permit 2/14/00 Page I iiihfi III Tiitbir~ir I I III 111 fTfcifcti 11 I ■i 4. Section 10.56, Subd. 16(J)(2); Topographic Alteration/Grading and Filling: Grading, filling or excavating of more than 10 cubic yards is prohibited within 75'of the Ordinary High Water Level of the public waters enumerated in Section 7 of this section. Grading, filling, or excavating of 10 cubic yards or less shall require City staff review and permit and be subject to other pertinent sections of the Zoning Code. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances to tear down an existing residence and build a new residence further back on the same lot. Also, the applicant is applying for a conditional use permit to permit grading within 75' of the lakeshore. The scope of the project involves moving the new residence back out of the 0-75' setback area and to be more in alignment with adjacent properties. The conditional use permit is to remove a “bulge ” in the topography to bring the lakeside of the lot more natural in flow with adjacent properties. ^tafl/Applicant Discussions: Plan #1: The process began in April of 1999 when the applicant brought in the first set of house plans. From the onset, the applicant wished to conform with zoning codes as best as possible. The first set of plans had many difficult issues dealing with the lot, elevations, setbacks, and hardcover coverage. The applicant decided to take the plans and redesign them. Plan #2: In October of 1999, the applicant came forwara with a second set of house plans. This set of house plans needed three variances (lot coverage, side yard setback and hardcover in 75-250' setback area) and a CUP was needed. The applicant decided they could make some changes to conform better w ’th Orono ’s zoning code. Plan #3: In January of 2000, the applicant came forward with a third set of house plans. This third set is the latest set of plans. The redesign eliminated the side yard setback, however, lot coverage, and hardcover coverage variances in the 0-75' md 75-250' setback areas and a CUP are still needed. The “bulge ” occurred in 1975 when the owner of 1270 Spruce Place was issued a permit to raise the house and build a basement under the existing residence. The owners apparently were not asked to regrade or replace any of the dirt removed, i.e. they were by default allowed to turn their lot into a “walkout ” lot. Since then, the City has denied a number of requests for similar grading to create walkout situations when they involved excavating in the 0-75' zone. Attached as Exhibit F is a memo from 1975 discussing the situation. Note: During the summer of 1999 while out on inspections for the neighboring property, Orono's building official was asked his opinion on what should and could be done to eliminate the “bulge.” He advised that one way to correct the “bad grading ” would be to remove the trees and level it out to flow more with the other properties. However, this would be inconsistent with the zoning code viewpoint on the matter and with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. i*2-i86 Elaine Erickson I2~0 Spruce Place Variance/Conditional Use Permit 2/14/00 Page 2 L_. _ y The applicant is aware that the existing well will need to be relocated. If it is kept in its current placement it will be underneath the new residence. l. i ANALYSIS The “existing” in these tables is the residence currently on the property. “Proposed” is the new residence the applicant is requesting variances to build. Lot Area and Yards: LR-IB Lot Area Lot Width Lakeshore yard Side yard Street yard Required 43,560 s.f.140'75'10'30' Existing 9,850 s.f.50'50'8.7' (north) 9 ’ (south) 80' Proposed 9,850 s.f.50'50’11.45'60' Structural Coverage: Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 9,850 s.f.Allowed; 1,477.5 s.f. (15%) or 1,500 s.f. Existing: 1,150 s.f. (11.7%) Proposed: 1,584 s.f. (16%) The house and garage square footage is 1,500 square feet. The portico (8.5* x 5') does not have a roof over it. The second story deck (6 ’ x 14') brings the total to 1,584 square feet. f U2486 Elaine Erickson 1270 Spruce Place Variances/Conditional Use Permit 2/14/00 Page 3 Hardcover Calculations: k .si . t Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0-75 ’3,750 s.f.533.2 s.f.0 s.f.219 s.f (14.21%)(0%)(5.84%) 75-250'6,100 s.f.1,682 s.f.1,525 s.f.2,965 s.f (27.58%)(25%)(48.6%) The hardcover coverage in the 0-75' setback area will be reduced to 0% if grading is permitted and the proposed residence and deck are moved back on the lot out of the 0-75' setback area. If grading is permitted, the sidewalk and steps will no longer be needed. However, the sidewalk and steps will remain if the grading is not allowed. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS The Planning commission may recommend approval of a conditional use permit amendment if the application meets the following standards: 1 . The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and the Comprehensive Municipal Plan; 2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter. Statement of Hardship ; The applicant has included the statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. H2486 Elaine Erickson 1270 Spruce Place Variances/Conditional Use Permit 2/14/00 Page 4 r i"«Sm •n 1 r.. Issues for Consideration; 1. The applicant is aware that the well v ill have to be moved. If it is kept in its current place, it will be underneath the new residence. The existing well is located 5' away from the west side of the residence. The proposed house location is directly over the well and city policy requires a well to be 3' from the residence. Therefore it needs to be moved to another location and 3' from the proposed res. 'ence. 2. The two sheds on the property should be removed. The sheds are currently used for storage. Construction of a garage will eliminate the need for the storage space and should be removed . 3. The residence should be shifted back 6' to keep it out of the 0-75' setback area. Moving the residence back 6' will keep it out of the 0-75' zone. City zoning code states no principal building shall be located closer than 75' to the natural ordinary high water mark of a lake abutting the property. New construction is an opportune time to adhere to zoning code regulations. 4. Newer residences constructed in the neighborhood have attached garages, even though the adjacent properties have detached garages. Garages: detached versus attached. Typically detached garages require less driveway thus less hardcover. Attached garages require longer driveways therefore more hardcover. 5. Grading within the 0-75' setback area and the concurrent removal of mature trees would seem to be in conflict with the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. See attached excerpts from the Comprehensive Plan regarding city policies and views on altering shoreline areas. 6. The grading and drainage appears inadequate and applicant should work further w ith staff to bring it to a suitable and workable design. 7. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. §2486 Elaine Erickson 1270 Spruce Place Variances/Conditional Use Permit 2/14/00 Pages r-'* ^1- Staff Recommendation; Staff recommends denial of a conditional use permit to permit grading, or excavating within 75' of the lakeshore. ► Review the applicant's stated hardships and determine whether justification exists to grant the requested variances. U2486 Elaine Erickson 1270 Spruce Place Variances/Conditional Use Permit 2/14/00 Page 6 I ENVIRONMENT JUNE, 1980 6. THE WETLANDS AND MARSHLANDS OF THE CITY WILL BE PROTECTED AND PRESERVED AS WILDLIFE HABITATS, AS UNIQUE OPEN SPACES, AND AS THE ONLY ECONOMICALLY PRACTICAL METHOD OF FLOOD PROTECTION AND STORM WATER RUNOFF FILTRATION. The Harza Study, the 208 Water Quality Management Study, and Orono's Surface Water Management Plan all recommend this approach to permanent water quality management for Lake Minnetonka. In addition, the Orono Plan goes on to identify individual wetlands and marshlands that require protection as part of the City's storm water management program. It is the policy ot this plan to effectuate the policies and recommen­ dations of the 1974 Orono Surface Water Management Plan. 7. PROTECTION OF THE CITY'S MARSHLAND, WETLANDS AND DRAINAGEWAYS SHALL INCLUDE PROTECTION OF ADJOINING LANDS AND PREVENTION OF DRAINAGE, FILLING, DREDGING OR WETLAND'S VEGETATION REMOVAL. Ordinances will establish setbacks for all land alteration or construction, wherever possible, the City will acquire open space and flowage easements for conservation of these lands. 8. PROTECTION OF LAKE RESOURCES WILL ALLOW REASONABLE ACCESS, USE AND ENJOYMENT WHILE PREVENTING OVERCROWDING AND EXCESSIVE ENCROACHMENT. In conformance with Mn. DNR Shoreline Management regulations for recreational development lakes, the City will prohibit overly dense « development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations ■ will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitiveF bays. Land use regulations will be developed to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachmentm LAKE SHORELINES WILL BE PROTECTED FROM ALTERATION. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clearcutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, natural stone rip rap shoreline protection will be encouraged. ' ■" ff 10. LAKE BED ALTERATIONS WILL BE DISCOURAGED BECAUSE OF ADVERSE SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM EFFECTS ON WATER QUALITY. Dredging of lake beds releases large amounts of otherwise trapped nutrients and sixu which adversely affects water quality for long periods of time. Dredging of new channels or inlets will not be approved to provide riparian access where none existed naturally. Dredging will be permitted in limited circumstances only where absolutely necessary to maintain existing natural riparian access permanently lost by something beyond the control of the landowner. Periodic low water conditions or the owner's desire for deeper draft watercraft are not sufficient reasons for disrupting sensitive lake beds. CMP 3-20 ENVIRONMENTAL JUNE, 1980 15. EROSION CONTROL PLANS AND PROGRAMS WILL BE REQUIRED IN ALL LAND ALTERATION PROJECTS. Each contractor will be required to minimize the probability of soil erosion on site and/or siltation damage downstream. The smallest amount of bare ground shall be exposed for as short a time as possible. Temporary ground cover will be required until permanent cover is provided. Sediment traps will be required on slopes and between construction sites and public roadways. Fill must be compacted and stabilized for permanence. URBAN AREA POLICIES FOR NATURAI RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 1. 4. 5. LAND USE STANDARDS WILL LIMIT THE IMPACT OF URBAN ENCROACHMENT ON LAKE MINNETONKA. Minimum lot widths will space out docks and structural encroachments while increasing areas of natural vegetation. Lake use regulations will limit the number of boats per property and the amount of public waters available for private docking and boat storage. RETENTION OF NATURAL VEGETATION WILL LIMIT THE IMPACT OF URBANIZATION AS VISIBLE FROM THE LAKE. Building heights will be limited to less than the typical tree height. Minimum green belts will be provided with prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be preserved on slopes. Retaining will be discouraged except when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened with natural vegetation. i i i i i i i DIRECT RUNOFF INTO THE LAKE WILL BE MINIMIZED. Standards will be established and maintained to limit the amount of impervious hardcover proportion to closeness of the shoreline. Maximum hardcover will be limited to 30% of each parcel within 1,000 feet of the shoreline pursuant to Mn. DNR recooimended shoreline practices. ALL EXISTING URBAN WETLANDS WILL BE MAINTAINED AND PROTECTED FOR SURFACE WATER RETENTION AND FILTRATION. The existing urban runoff exceeds the capacity of the urbun marshes to assimilate all nutrients, therefore additional pollution hazards would be created if any wetlands would be lost. Additional steps to improve nutrient assimilation include on**site retention, on all new developments and storm water recycling through the existing marshes. CITY MAINTENANCE PRACTICES WILL BE DESIGNED TO IMPROVE STORM WATER QUALITY. Salt use for winter street treatment will be minmized. Snow removal practices will locate temporary storage sites where they will not overload the natural drainage system or where foreign matter, especially salt, will net directly enter a marsh or lake. Spring cleanup will promptly remove road sands and salts before environmental damage occurs. i i i i ■ ■ ■ CMP 3-22 ■ i « ■ i I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I tAND USE JUNE, 1980 3. 4. 5. © DEVELOPMENT DENSITY WILL BE LIMITED THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO A LEVEL WHICH WILL NOT OVERLOAD THE NATURAL SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE AND FILTRATION SYSTEM. Urbanization increases the speed and quantity of surface runoff while decreasing the water quality. Developed land use 'densities will be determined by comparison between known levels of volume and pollution generation and known marshland capacity for ponding and nutrient assimilation. THE WETLANDS AND MARSHLANDS OF THE CITY WILL BE PROTECTED AND PRESERVED AS WILDLIFE HABITATS, AS UNIQUE OPEN SPACES, AND AS THE ONLY ECONOMICALLY PRACTICAL METHOD OF FLOOD PROTECTION AND STORM WATER RUNOFF FILTRATION. Wetlands, drainageways and floodplains will be protected from encroachment and from alteration or destruction by filling, grading, excavation or drainage. Wherever possible, the City will acquire open space and flowage ease­ ments for conservation of these lands. PROTECTION OF LAKE RESOURCES WILL ALLOW REASONABLE ACCESS, USE AND ENJOYMENT WHILE PREVENTING OVERCROWDING AND EXCESSIVE ENCROACHMENT. In conformance wich Hn. DNR Shoreline Management regulations for recreational development lakes, Orono will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will be developed to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. \| lake shorelines will be protected from ALTERATION. //Shoreland areas, whether bluff, beach or floodplain, I are sensitive environmental features with significant I impact on lake water quality, aesthetic values and I land use function. These same factors act to draw I development which can be destructive if not properly I regulated. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas I will be preserved Insofar as practical and reason- I able in order to retard surface runoff and soil I erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clear- I cutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or I wave action erosion, material stone rip rap * I shoreline protection will be encouraged. CMP 4-13 I I I I I I I fAND US£ JUNE, 1980 SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF NATURAL WOODLANDS AND OPEN SPACE WILL BE RETAINED ON EACH PROPERTY. Retention of the natural environment requires careful siting and preservation of trees and open space on each urban property. ■ ■ RIIRAI I AND USE POLICIES 1. ORONO’S RURAL SERVICE AREA WILL BE RESERVED FOR PERMANENT LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE. Orono's rolling rural area is not suitable for commercial agriculture. Likewise, the delicate balance of storm water nutrient loading vs marshland assimilative capacity preclude expansion of the urban service area without major environmental problems for Lake Minnetonka. Therefore, the ideal land use for that portion of Orono located outside of the Urban Service Area (MUSA) is the planned low-density rural residential land use. commercial and industrial uses will not be permitted in the rural area. ■CMP 4-19 ?■ i Application # ^ Date RecciveJ~ V// f /f f Amount Paid 3 (J ^ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from ori^nal application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION She Address 7/^S ^ r Lf c t p Jo. c Property Identification Number fP.I.D.) - \\n ' CC Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired___________________________________________^(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X residential ___pother (specify)______________________ Zoning District: LiQ ^ lA ______________________________________________. APPUCANT Name /rJ ^ f r j, c l\ Address: ?> ^ Phonefliome ) 0 £ _______ Phone(work)___________________ “ ^ _________ Citv:p^y^J^. n'Jil Zi^\ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home). Name PA ft dc-< ^ n Phone (work). Address:___________________________ City:_____________Zip:. __ - 7} a •V. M DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: c Estimated Construction Cost $ — f. i'l tk a UJ h r < ^ c / jf H Ta A/r ttnc o f\iJe f r t-^ f f p ^ y-~l^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area ___Lot Width ___Setback: Front / CA7Side Y Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage m Sfe: Si * Average Lakeshore Other (sp ’fy) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Tk OA nAiTy^n^ y}’>t* hhtck < h >> u , U t 7~i JCt c /OY^At>r . t1)& Ccrh.M u c-u U ^ f' /*(- — ^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) Application U Date Receh ed I - -C:^) Amount Paid rO CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION ^ Site Address__________/ ^TQ "2 Type of Application to be Filed_____C~Q P Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) OS1/ / - - 3^ 'CO I ^ APPLICANT - Name Phone (home) Phone (work). Address y?"7 ^ C ftcC^ City Cju<A<^1.A-fTPr____Zip___ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ___ Phone (home). Phone (work). Address City Zip, Date Property Acquired ■t (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _____$ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____$175.00 Residential Accessory Use _____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _____$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more X • ••• \ h' ■■ \V* • . r • V ' _ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee • > OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation _____$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule A } j(fn> 6 ok) > ^ . I c S<>yKafe^ ^ ^yujLCjldkaS 0^ (Z^Stj (joC c ^ j^'PuSyU. o_. ? V \l iO^cQjt l/iCtV^ AOjiTkOtAJ^C^ OSpjUl (jotif # w \; *: ^F^.' i ■ T* I >>'-■ MM 4-f (b-c ^ojZ^-\.k^ULlI— “f "(ujL I'yoo h-02^ i/yx^lo 1 ix<^\tXl^vJj 6->^ky kjxo SjfujLjlt^ kk(SAWO^ ^yv-fUx. "hhuMi. Ixy^JUji —fOuAy^(/M^ y^osJjrLtrS . iT» f-i <! o«i> - ««t«a< I. Nancy Anderson, am writing on behalf of my mother. Elaine Erickson. My parents have been residents of Orono for over 35 years. In 1979, in anticipation of my father ’s retirement, they purchased a small old home (1270 Spruce Place) next door to me. Their plan was to rent it until the day came when they felt the ' could not handle the upkeep of their big home and then to build a new, easy to maintain, home on this property. They began the process of building in early 1998 by contacting a builder who had just finished building a "retirement” home on Spruce Place. Their directive was to design a small home with all needs for an older couple on one floor with an additional bedroom and family space in the lower, walkout, level. When the plan was finished they approached Orono and began the process of securing the permission to build. There were many problems with the lot and the plan....size, elevation, set backs. They, with the help of their builder, redid plans and surveys and consulted several times with Orono employees. By the fall of 1998 they had committed to full speed ahead to build in the summer of 1999. My Dad died, unexpectedly, in the Spring of 1999. The new, small house is an absolute necessity now. From the first meetings with various Orono employees, we have made it our goal to comply with the rules and regulations as best we can. There are several overriding problems with the lot that make this application for the altering of the land a necessity. The first and foremost problem is the unnatural contour of the lakeside as it compares to the neighboring properties. A second issue is one of drainage and placement of the house in relation to the street. We are requesting the removal of the “bulge" (dirt) in the topography and removal of one tree on the lake side. This will bring the lot in flow with the lots on the north and south and will allow the house to walk out on the northeast corner. It will allow the lower level to have a family space and a bedroom. This change will also allow the level of the garage to stay at an acceptable level to the street for drainage reasons. The final consideration is that this seems to really be the only solution to providing for acceptable drainage for the neighboring properties. Please be advised that there is ofi question about replacing trees and planting lots of bushes and shrubs. My mother is a haray gardener and a nature lover (other than geese!). We have already discussed, at length, what pines spruce etc can be planted to recreate a “woodsy" feel to the lot. We have had discussions with all of our neighbors and without an exception they are supportive of our plans. We are including the signatures of the near north and south neighbors who have reviewed our plans. We are including photos for your information. so s,f'UUUCSL. K ^ V JBlac/C A7 S/IC9A? f/Ul JS£^l^/S^O ^sUKcC U (T^ rz-i-r 7 • V** JC.;- a ' S u u* ''’C.::/' : J99ff ■ / .. '%J □ m WOOD STAKE PLACED O « IRON MON. SET B.M. - • « IRON MON. INPLACE BEARINGS ON PROPOSED INFORMATION ASSUMED DATUM i«f PLOOfl ELEV.GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. _ EASEMENT ELEV.TOP BLOCK ELEV. —« DRAINAGE 000.0 *EXIST. ELEV. (oOO.o)« PROPOSED ELEV.000.0 * ^ SCHOBORG ND SURVEYING INC. 9n<02i m. 13SC I hereby certify thet this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State Date /: /99^Registration No 14700 JOB • Book - Page ■fj. Scale /"^30 1 iWKMir MfOty tnat Um ptan. survey or jspor. was aBaroBbyiiiaer unosr my dirset suoarvtaioft and that 1 am »MlyllaBlaMW^U^^i^^^ur»dartha lawa of tha Sun JOB. B ook - Pogt zs Seal* .r^2o • ■ IRON MON. •;:r'i>CS□ • WOOD STAKE PLACED O ■ IRON MON. SET B.M. •75/’ '•/te TCu. HCft, i BEARINGS ON PROPOSED INFORMATION ASSUMED DATUM ________m FLOOR ELEV. BASEMENT ELEV. DRAINAGE 000.0 • EXIST. ELEV. (O00.oj< PROPOSED ELEV. GARAGL floor ELEV. TOP BLOCK ELEV. loaf ■ exist. & PROP. ELEV. (-Vc'd lf(q(CO ■ ji- r ; % v; ‘4 ;h- ■■’■ V- TZL \ jsmJsosm&MZJZ^ \ LE[jEra;KK: ■ i ■ J *■ — r,< < ^ ^ fWXr-^r iMIntf Tgnt-rnC -i ^tfTiarC^ I i TiT- "^li^ft^i itr^rTiin ■ VOr7^IOM«^/nr*B->*r^VMMm — ••* ' K^fxyir^.2.*:ttJBr.;rMr^. • • •«• ». ■■«a^A»tr-tta7-^arr:v^ •. t a l.ft "I. ' V ' * f. * V ■* • 1 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET RCLE ONE) .(^5^ 75-250’ 250-500’ ^^STE^HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ^^jt,L> x r Leosth Width X X X B- Garage • m * •' • C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk JlH X X E. Patlo/Deek X X 4 F. Landsc^e Uaderiais By Plastic Or Fabric an lii X X X <a A O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •A • __ +. B ^■n^:pr- RRQPOSED HARDCOVim IN ZONE ' A. House _________ X Leogih Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk • ixcci I ‘bitpt b E. Patio/Deck X X X X IH F; Landscape Underialn By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - A ,3iq + B ^'ToC iraTfri null I iHlinn i I'ifi I'l n~ xlOO xlOO 500-1000’ • .c-c^ Ik. 5M- I "iy.il 9J &D ^4. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. f5 S.F. S.F. % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. I A ' B S.F. __S.F. _S.E- % 0—m mk ; «>. ,*1 Si’S 1«:Wm • f ^..’N? v^' -'■ ■!. A » t ■ - :/ ■ # •• . > f. . ' I ., <" ■»' SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) _ _ • ^ijoyriNCf HARDCOVER Pf ZONE A. uaixK S.Q^.6» HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ________ ____ ^ ^ - -. A MM* m «*/\ ^AAt0-75 (^-250’>250-500'500-1000 ’ ' Lcasth /P Ait'u Ctt-c/ov^ B. -Garage C. Driveway n X X X X P« Sidewalk X X E. B»io/S«6k f^feep 4 X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric 37 X X X O. Other X TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A • I.L-X:^ +. TOOPOSED HARDCOViro IN ZONE A. House Lr I_______ x pCvi lCC vrJi Leofih X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk -!■X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A • # /N + B ^ /S'n^r: • S S.F. WUih iO K-^'t S.F. • r=S.F. sr fr 'A S.F. S.F. • - • • • :^i ' ■ ■ •• • S.F. •S.F. 'ILrLr •S.F. —-Zl C3 ^fC S.F. 3 hSi S.F. S S.F. • 7fi_S.F. c S.F. B S.F. • 10 S.F. fE X S.F. f->JCC S.F. UiOO XlOO •-VI Ai9 % • S.F. • width S.F. 0 S«F« 0 S.F. • S.F. /37^S.F. 0 S.F. ••cPr * S.F. $ T <• *0 • •• > -V <\ S.F. ••• •0 • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. A B S.F. »ic5 xlOO _S.F. S.F. TV: I.- ~ * c >//'.' • s S.F.S.F. •S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.S.F.fC S.F. S.F. S.F. Z4 S.F. S.F. • S.F. S.F. X S.F. /c {'.S.F. '/. .^9 % S.F. CC S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. >70 S.F. SMBsWm^.mm w-mm. rani Schuller - <^Jt rifn!it%S: '’?hov ’c".int^^^^^ "^’^riSt'’Sev. Ti^t ""‘' It 1.e!,oovcs ,u. to l.c ^^rr^■ careful vl.cn shore pro]”>crt''. 1 mnilc an oiox'ntion*: The ncople ’*’cro stmlv not renrit an^^ M not asV for nUorition*^ in the 7S* sethaeV area,aware that there couia not he anv nltor.itions in .Sw ;rrtXv:i would he Mp.her than the i.*.alKout foor. ^ .J S:-f . ‘ k-' ’•■•: ?,i ’ ., •.• w- \f0': H' ■ < ; Y ♦ 1 ■ ''©;| w K s. 1 ^ By- I 'Is . h\' mmii *!# 'Wi^' ^ Ti i'F---'iS® e:: i ' .■, . '* ; ----------- W0 -C;:"t^-'- I ’ ' "If /tT-V i '• w rv-^ * ft «#llWt^'’ 1 -fT^- 'r-f^ i rf'4->" ’'h-/ ,-c I ;-* 1,. M '’•**%' # »,*'— - ® *■_' . VA*;JSr’ ■' >.:». « c: ■. ' ~J''»- / ,V"v ' - / ' *♦■ ‘ *' ^ * . -f ? ', ' * \ i '\ \' « vlllBf-.- ‘ H «V '- ^..* 4' ^ \ f/V "7 ' -c .:. -,v r: L.s u «A - «7> -v® f 1-1-1* I- : i ■';i A. >. ^*-<1 ^ <- I 2iL»\- - , V:• r^: » n '•i ^j • •'• *•*! •“» >>J « Jl '1 • •-♦ I ^ id. L>*\S- (?■ ■>* l\r- •’■’• *w. • ■^■•’•■ iIti1 mmam >' >• V C #. *' CSI Lgl^l ,!.• ■ f *• * # it -'r ■■^ 2f"l,« >> S»W; UJoA^AM m S- -tV)' . *8. • *% f ;j ' NORTH ARM LAKE MINNETONKA AVti • ^Jenningi^ Bay % • *. •• •• • 1 •^ • _ * • ® ’'■ S5s ■ ^MRMIU Harrison *11 M 300 9*^ CzIljj MH ULIHLLirl r\V * 2 . V»<*t/w00^.^rt — • vR ORONo/s i4rm \ J600 BOHNS fOlNT slk \ V 5/toJMooe/ ;A m PEERING ps^LAN Fagerness Point 1-mofKUiin MAWIOO BO2400» BTUTT ...----- 1-BUOY U »n )-filf NOALf BO ^ iSetonl Lake,A _ caaait Ssti |?B? ■Si»iiiia 'EST SPRING iS^"*■A,«S ------err BHOBfiut-Q •• ZAoi Ss »£Mf»4»f OaOTDUAVt ~v TOiA, on ___ “‘ ML *n^ IN-/3 E 3Mi/ BtaciTTake ^ - ''----MMSUULTy/^ \ la f \ ) fJts Bay MOUND :! a#t4m =w 32T?;su ■TIBUCNa.. Spring Park Crystal Bot % • * . V V'^ ■-....,. jHtftjUvcy Ay/gfi§i*^ V mnim a •• t • *«Lj»yyj GOOSE_ icr AKm CBTSTAB »«T<NI THuiVi^tSy^ ^ in* F a«A ^ AXSHORCLINC oo f/. Car/non SOB ,2-ICf ITOIAB ITV riOP ABM TAXPAVCB NANi/ABM OWNiR NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ABM vi OIMni NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ABM 'pm BNNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ABM ••feU','; PROP ABM ONMER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ABM TAXPAYER NAHE/ABM SB Br-XlT-ES hi tRSt RIS7R NMTN ARM M C N BANXCX • R L K BANXCK KARX A CNRISTOPHER BANXCX 1S7B NORTH ARM M MOUM MN S5SM HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHNERS LIST SB B7-117-2S hi MSI R1S05 SPRUCE PL CLAYTON R FUCHS CLAYTON R FUCKS ISfS SPRUCE PL MOUND MN 55SM REPORT NO. PXASSBtl PACE 19 SB B7-117-2S B1 IB7B Bim LOMA LINDA AVE X L HOFFMANN t L S HOFFMANN XENNETN L t LINDA S HOFFMANN lEM LOMA LINDA AVE HOUND MN SSSM SB B7-117-2S B1 BBB7 B121B LOMA LINDA AVE DONALD R UDELL ET AL RONALD R B CAROLYN UDELL 1210 LOMA LINDA AVE NN SSSM SB BB-117-25 S2 BBBB B12SB SPRUCE PL MALTER N MOLFE ET AL PNVLLXS J NOLF 12SB SPRUCE PL NN S5SM SB BB-117-2S 52 BB14 B12BB SPRUCE PL P J B S J SCMUELLER PAUL J B SUSAN J SCHUELLER 12BB SPRUCE PL NN SBSM SB BB-117-2S S2 BB17 BlSlt SPRUCE PL JOHN N NAUER JOHN N NAUER ISIB SPRUCE PLACE HOUND MN SS5M SB B7-117-25 41 0077 01254 LOMA LINDA AVE X L HOFFMANN B L S HOFFMANN XENNETN L B LINDA S HOFFMANN 1254 LOMA LINDA AVE HOUND MN S5SB4 SB 07-117-2S 41 00B9 •1290 LOMA LINDA AVE J N CARY 0 D L CABLE JOEL N CARY B DIXIE L CABLE 1290 LOMA LINDA AVE HOUND MN 55544 SB Oa-117-25 52 0012 01240 SPRUCE PL E A ANDERSON ET AL TRUSTEES EVAN A ANDERSON 1240 SPRUCE PL HOUND MN 55544 SB 0B*117-25 52 0015 01290 SPRUCE PL HILLXAM B ELIZABETH AHERN HILLXAN B ELIZABETH AHERN 1500 SPRUCE PLACE ORONO MN 55544 SB OB-117'25 52 OOlS 01518 SPRUCE PL PATRICIA A CROETXEN PATRICIA A OROETKEN 151B SPRUCE PLACE MOUND MN 55544 5B 07-117-25 41 0052 01574 NORTH ARM DR WILLIAM E BOWEN WILLIAM E BOWEN 40 PARK LANE MPLS MN 55414 SB 07-117-25 41 007B 01295 SPRUCE PL HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 44 CRYSTAL BAY HN 5552S SB 0B-117-2S S2 0007 01240 SPRUCE PL D A WALLNER B L J WALLNER DAVID A WALLNER 1240 SPRUCE PL mound HN 55544 SB 0B-117-2S 52 0015 01270 SPRUCE PL X H B E E ERICXSON XENNETN B EUINE ERIUSON 2775 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA HN 55591 50 OB-117-25 52 0014 01500 SPRUCE PL RICHARD F XYLE RICHARD F B XATHLEEN A KYLE 1500 SPRUCE PL HOUND MN 55544 TOTAL BATCH 502 00017 MM MTf lt/t7/ff MTCN fM ISNNEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PXASMtl PACE 21 38 07 117 23 41 0091 1220 LOMA LINDA AVE W WYATT A NANCY S MOE W WYATT MOE 825 8TH ST S 38 07 117 23 41 0092 1230 SPRUCE PL W WYATT A NANCY S MOE W WYATT MOE 825 8TH ST S MPLS MN 55404 JS riTV 0^93CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 crystal bay MN 55323 4 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO TNE REST OF NY KNOMLEDCE AND RELIEF. - M ULKUpi t: 1210 ^pf\Kt<.Pt K PERMIT RECORD Permit No Date Type of Permit ^DC/nOP^ HS<t .&iJ—C,..2l U/Cs^^C W. *ih0*4 ^ S)^ €~a; o t€I < r a 1 tf>k^;-<49k Ald'jwi‘..-, A ■• ■——------------ -■-itTlHWfcl 1 .ra^ Mf. «!.•'«-^1 I IllTlih/l^im ■ I Hi • ttftkta ii ainfcm II nm ‘ > > > y *“rr... ^ r t " * V REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COnMril McpTIMG JUN 1 2 200U CITY Up Unv^,^^ DATE: June 7, 2000 ITEM NO. Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2557 Daniel and Judith McAthie 1449 Bay Ridge Road Variance Review Zoning:LR-IA, One Family Rural Residential, 2 Acre Minimum lot size Summary of Request: The City Council adopted, on consent. Resolution No. 4416 for Daniel and Judith McAthie to grant variances to permit construction of an addition to the garage and the addition of a second story to an existing one level home at 1449 Bay Ridge Road. The contractor, Michael Hayes Homes, had applied for and received a building permit to begin construction on May 15th. After begmmng the proiject the contractor determined a small portion of the foundation on the back of the house would need to be replaced because it was cracked. Also, some of the joists were rotten requiring the entire house to be removed, except the foundation. During a recent inspection Staff had noticed the house was removed. Subsequently, Staffhas placed the Building Permit on hold. The contractor has stated some alteration of the foundation will be required to stablize and bring the foundation to existing code, and some of the foundation to the back of the house will have to be replaced. The contractor has stated most of the existing foundation can be used for the house. The variance approval assumed only the roof would be removed from the existing structure and a second story would be added. Also a small portion of foundation would be added to accommodate for the alteration to the garage. Work was stopped by Staff for Council direction regarding whether reconsideration of the application should occur since the house encroaches approximately 20' into the average lakeshore setback and within the 30' side yard setbacks. The foundation remains and is located over 150' from the lakeshore across County Road 15. The building being located into the average lakeshore setback may not be an issue as most houses in the locality are located across County Road 15 and on a hill. The intent of the average lakeshore setback ordinance is to protect views from adjacent properties. The impact to adjacent properties is minimal. The property owner and contractor have indicated there would not be any alterations to the approved plan for the outside appearance and height of the house approved with the variances. ■ ■■■ - » ,1 Til -1^ M ilAAani tWl.TV* -;*W. rVt 1 --------------- ^ f>f M f * 1 i COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To give direction to Building and Zoning Staff whether the applicant should be permitted to continue and build above the existing foundation. Options for Council Action: 1.To permit the applicant to continue based on the intent of the variance approvals and no exterior alterations are proposed. This option would limit the size of the house to the plans approved with the variance. Staff is comfortable with this option based on the assumption the building would be constructed in accordance with the plans approved by the Council per Resolution 4416. 2.To advise the applicant to submit a new land use application with the direction based on the fact the entire building was removed and a small portion of the foundation would be replaced if it is considered new construction and should require lot width and lot area variances for new construction on a non-conforming lot. The lot is a one acre lot in the two acre zoning district and is less than the 200' minimum lot width required. If the Council would choose this option it would be appropriate to discuss the issue of the building encroaching into the average lakeshore setback. A new application may result in a new site plan and building design if the existing foundation is not used. List of Exhibits: A B C D Letter to Property Owners (June 5,2000) Approved Plans Resolution No. 4416 Planning Report (January 20,2000) 1 t i ----- ---- ■ I ■' ■ ¥ TV ; A?« r=. C''.' S:r, f- I. ?• ■ / /.O v\ r>.^ •> f/J CITYof ORONO Municipal OfRces <«^// Street Address: 2750 Kelley PaAway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 Daniel and Judith McAthie 1449 Bay Ridge Road Wayzata, MN 55391 June 5,2000 Dear Mr. and Mrs. McAthie: This letter is in response to our recent phone conversation regarding construction of a new residence at 1449 Bay Ridge Road. The building permit for your property has been put on hold to review &e variance approvals granted on January 24,2000 per Resolution No. 4416. B^ed on a site inspection by Staff it has been determined the entire structure and a portion of the existing foundation has been removed. The variance approval assumed only the roof would be removed from the existing structure and a second story would be added. Also a small portion of foundation would be added to accommodate for the alteration to the garage. The City has typically considered projects that require removal of structures and/or alteration to an existing foundation as new construction. Based on this premise, a new house would be required to meet the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance or to apply for additional variances for lot area ^d lot width, as the lot does not meet the minimum requirements for the LR-1A zoning district. Variances would also by required to permit new construction to occur within the average distance of the adjacent residences from the lakeshore and within 30' of the side property lines. As discussed, we will place this item on the City Council agenda for June 12,2000. The meeting will be held at the City Council Chambers located at 2750 Kelley Parkway beginning at 7:00 p.m. Do not hesitate to contact me at (952) 249-4600 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Paul Weinberger Zoning Administrator/Planner cc: Lyle Oman, Building Official NIarc Davis, Building Inspector Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249*4616 www.ci.orooo.mn.us L____.. JL. yt^NTj" guev^fcgpoH He.A*(Hie PsiSrtoeMtfe \/^m. IW L'.m’ ■ V / »•-J». ^ / [! P / r V. ■ # *. •! • C4- / . • r ! L .•* •». — *.. •» *f (i / Jfi r c i,.f y .» , 1. i; A i A \ A dti MV - ViJ it- ■“ -• 1'^ j “V^ L’ .'-■ f f = r V •■ i.; c V •■'■:3 '. f •.V -1 r 'Vf • ^ .) • ^ \i •/ •'/ ^ 'I ^9 . f ■»-' ■ t t CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. - •• ____ RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1(B) & 2; AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C) (6) & (L) (2); AND SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6(B) FILE NO. 2557 WHEREAS, Daniel J. McAthie and Judith K. McAthie, husband and ^ife, (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 1449 Bay Ridge Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Tracts C and P, Registered Land Survey No. 192, Subject to easement for County Road 15, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property ); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Mirmesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 19,2000, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Mumcipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6) to allow the construction of an addition to the garage and an addition to the second story of the existing home that encroaches 20' into the average lakeshore setback and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 an Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to allow 5,745 s.f. (28.27%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback area where 6,241 s.f. (30.7%) exists and 5,081 s.f (25%) is allowed and per Section 10^..:>, Subdivision 6(B) to allow a side yard setback of 10.62' to the north property line and 9.93 set ac to the south property line where 30' setback is required. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Page 1 of6 .r m i . Ua, C6^ m CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4 4 1 6NO. 1. 2. 3. 5. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2557. This property is located in the LR-l A Zoning District, where 2 acres or 87,120 s.f. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of approximately .98 acres or 42,784 s.f. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 19,2000 and recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The lot is unusually shaped undersized for the LR-l A Zoning District. B. The amount of hardcover in the 75-250' setback area is being reduced from 6,241 s.f. (30.7%) to 5,745 s.f. (28.27%). C. The residence was built in 1967 prior to standards being adopted for hardcover and average lakeshore setback. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City- Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the communitv. Page 2 of 6 r \ ■'.4 > k- rr CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.4 4 1 6 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(6) to allow the construction of an addition to the garage and an addition to the second story of the existing home that encroaches 20' into the average lakeshore setback and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) to allow 5,745 s.f. (28.27%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback area where 6,241 s.f. (30.7%) e.xists and 5,081 s.f. (25%) is allowed and per Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to allow a side yard setback of 10.62' to the north property line and 9.93' setback to the south property line where 30' setback is required. Approval was subject to the following conditions; 1.Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to ^s resolution on Page 6. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the appUc^ts, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (January 24,2001). 3.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the tenns of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property . Pace 3 of 6 y CITYofOKONO .1 ■'t'-U RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4 4 16NO. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of January, 2000. ATTEST: /i' //x Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabri^abbour, Mayor Jt— Toperty Owner^s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of January , 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. /V A-/* j ----------------JSi8Ss-a3^, CAROLE A HASEMAN NOTARY PU8UC • KCNNESOTA Mir Comndnien Expim Jm. 31.2009 Notary Public Page 4 of 6 L-..i t ■ I- L-'c; f' /- Vi 'i.i- [r^ r t i,. mri>i r -f il CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Aa. ^ ^_____ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) On this // _____day of 2000, before nie a Notary Public vdthin and for said County, personally appeared P^Lnid T. ^/^A-tVi.v^^wrc/.-f** /CA/<»AMK'.LvKin^<^ftiT«C i—_ known to me to be Ae person(s) described in and who e.xecuted the foregoing instrument, an acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary PublicCAROLE A KASE^/AN NOTARY PUBUC • MNNESGTA Mr CemMon Ei^lmi Jbl SI. 2006 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this__________day of____2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as Ws (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 liii—^ w CO -♦i vjf If.« f/" I* CJk i::^ \ \ r* **'• '* ■/*•• M • • • J § *>■ \ V V i.*^ - '* '''-if.— # 40MMV SmnflHG 4 omNBSMWO ca mm^mmrn UMiMifiiiM 9mmnm uwHom me wmam lamimfHMM** I 4«*i i^f^i4i SSgfa»axs .yga«pJ; ** * ** <—4 ■^ — f •■•A MM •« •• «MP^ iH^ «esnsssss3i^».u-.^«^^^~ * \ Oiunac tCAlA I BMI NO o VOs*a< >• \ Application Date: 1/04/00 Completion Date: 1/04/00 60 Day Deadline: 3/04/00 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 1/20/00 ITEM NO Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: §2557 Daniel J. and Judith K. McAthie 1449 Bay Ridge Road Variance Zoning Dbtrict: LR-IA One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre) Lot Area:42,784 s.f. (.98 acres) * V Application: The applicant ’s have applied for variances to permit the addition of a garage and living space to the existing residence. They are proposing to raise the roof of the existing residence for additional living space on the second story. They are also proposing to enlarge the garage approximately 350 s.f. and reducing the size of the turn around in the driveway. The amount of hardcover in the 75-250' setback area will be reduced by 495 s.f. (2.43%). The residence was built at its present location in 1967 and now requires variances for side yard setback and average lakeshore setback. The requested variances are for: 1. Section 10.23, Subd. 6(B): Lot Yard Requirements: Side Yard: To permit a 10.62' setback to the north property line and a 9.93' setback to the south property line where 30' setback is required. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: To permit a variance for the second story addition to encroach 20' into the average lakeshore setback. 3 Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover: Within 75-250' of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. To pemiit a hardcover variance to allow 5,745.5 s.f. (28.27%), where 6,241 s.f. (30.7%) exists, and 5,081 s.f. (25%) is allowed. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 5 to 0 vote to: Approve the application as presented. V''- "r;: v->klfe k ■ . STAFF RECOMMENDATION; To approve the enclosed resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution, V# ‘ » * h.- v'T / A ,2" J ifS (■ ‘ f.r t f. RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1(B) & 2; AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C) (6) & (L) (2); AND SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6(B) FILE NO. 2557 WHEREAS, Dar.iel J. McAlhie and Judith K. McAthie, husband and wife, (hereinafter "the applicants”) are owners of the property located at 1449 Bay Ridge Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Tracts C and P, Registered Land Survey No. 192, Subject to easement for County Road 15, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 19, 2000, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6) to allow the construction of an addition to the garage and an addition to the second story of the e.xisting home that encroaches 20' into the average lakeshore setback and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to allow 5,745 s.f. (28.27%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback area where 6,241 s.f. (30.7%) exists and 5,081 s.f. (25%) is allowed and per Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to allow a side yard setback of 10.62' to the north property line and 9.93' setback to the south property line where 30' setback is required. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Page 1 of 6 t III I ’ifwli AtmiOtfl III :‘ 'V ■~V ]m^’<\. 2. 3. 5. • 6. FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2557. This property is located in the LR-IA Zoning District, where 2 acres or 87,120 s.f is the minimum lot area. Tlie property consists of approximately .98 acres or 42,784 s.f. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this >’pplication on January 19, 2000 and recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. B. The lot is unusually shaped undersized for the LR-1A Zoning District. The amount of hardcover in the 75-250' setback area is being reduced from 6,241 s.f. (30.7%) to 5,745 s.f. (28.27%). C.The residence was built in 1967 prior to standards being adopted for hardcover and average lakeshore setback. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessaiy to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary' to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping w ith the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and w elfare of the community. Page 2 of 6 i m-. ,» % . I, ir-* CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(6) to allow the construction of an addition to the garage and an addition to the second story of the existing home that encroaches 20' into the average lakeshore setback and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) to allow 5,745 s.f. (28.27%) hardcover in the 75-250 ’ lakeshore setback area where 6,241 s.f. (30.7%) exists and 5,081 s.f. (25%) is allowed and per Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to allow a side yard setback of 10.62' to the north property line and 9.93' setback to the south property line where 30' setback is required. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution on Page 6. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a bui Iding permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (January 24, 2001). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 6 t. m ■ i i, > V."- try^ m r> LV iV :-■ ;'>L Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of January, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNl Y OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of January, 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said insUaunent was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public A Page 4 of 6 'T K STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. * ■ COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) A On this day of 2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this__________day of ____2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. fT‘ * * .“‘t » ■ Notary Public ■f-t' Page 5 of 6 u m a CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 ZONING FILE # 2557 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: January 20, 2000 TO: Judith K. and Daniel J. McAthie 1449 Bay Ridge Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: Kathy Alexander Alexander Design Group, Inc. 401 East Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: January 19,2000 VOTE: 5 FOR AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council on January 24,2000 at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. ■ w.ir^ it*/;"<0t- VIV ri f • TO;Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM:Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:January 14, 2000 SUBJECT; #2557 Dan and Judith McAthie 1449 Bay Ridge Road Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential District acre) Lot Area:42,784 s.f. (.98 acre) This application requires the following variances: Section 10.23, Subd. 6(B): Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements: Side yard: The minimum requirement shall be observed for side yard setback: 30 feet. To permit a 10.62' setback to the north property line and a 9.93' setback to the south property line where 30' setback is required. Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots, except this does not apply to stairways, lifts, landings, and lockboxes. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. To permit a variance for the second story addition to encroach 20' into the average lakeshore setback. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcc''<*r: Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. To permit a hardcover variance to allow 5,745.5 s.f. (28.27%) where 6,241 s.f (30.7%) exists and 5,081 s.f (25%) is allowed. Application Summary: The applicants have applied for variances to permit the addition of a garage and living space to the existing residence. They are propcsmg to raise the roof of the existing residence for additional living space on the second story. The' e also proposing to enlarge the garage approximately 350 s.f and reducing the size of the turn -.oii n*’ in the driveway. The amount of hardcover in the 75- 250' setback will be reduced by 495 - s.f ( .43%). The residence was built at its present location in 1967 and now requires variances for side yard setback and average lakeshore setback. The applicants seek approval of variances for side yard setback, average lakeshore setback and hardcover in the 75-250' setback area. U2557 Daniel/Judith McAthie 1449 Bay Ridge Road Variances 1/14/00 Page I 4 r i t I :'.=V ANALYSIS Lot Area: LR-IA Lot Area Side Yard Setback Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres)30’ Actual 42,784 s.f. (.98 acre)9.93' (south) 10.62' (north) Structural Coverage : Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 42,784 s.f.Allowed: 6,417.6 s.f. (15%) Existing: 3,738 s.f. (8.7%) Proposed: 4,088 s.f (9.5%) Hardcover Calculations: Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing hardcover Proposed hardcover 0’ - 75 ’1,648 s.f 0%98 s.f (5.9%)98 s.f (5.9%) 75' - 250’20,324 s.f 5,081 s.f (25%) 6,241 s.f (30.7%) 5,745.5 s.f (28.27%) 250’ - 500'20,812 s.f 6,243.6 s.f (30%) 4,142 s.f (20%) 3,708 s.f (17.8%) Statement of Hardship: The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. #2557 Daniel/Judith McAthie 1449 Bay Ridge Road Variances 1/J4/00 Page! I Hill 1 ^w:■ T - • - I- H.H:: ? ■. t‘*+ ,vf ■’ Issues of Concern: 1. The residence was constructed in 1967 and at that time it was located closer to the lakeshore than the adjacent neighboring properties. 2. The amount of hardcover in the 75' - 250' setback area is being reduced. 3. Other issues the Planning Commission may have. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of variances for side yard setback, average lakeshore setback and hardcover in the 75' - 250' setback area. Exhibits A Application B Site Plan/Survey C Floor Plans D ElevationsA/^iews E Hardcover Calculations F Average Lakeshore Setback G Topographic Map H Plat Map I Location Map J Property Owner’s List K Permit Record U2557 Daniel/Judith McAlhie 1449 Bay Ridge Road Variances 1/14/00 Page 3 Al 1 I ~Mh > i~l I f Sfcili i i iSiii i < fs III iBtii 11 Ml ■' A |Sl> CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Application # Date Received / ^ Amount Paid 3 cc co • (Urr^p- i\k>/'.rder IrC Property Identification Number (T.I.D.) [g \ .Attach legal description to application if no: included on required survey. Date ProgsBtJ^cquired_______11—_________________________ I (do)z(aono^hlso own the adjacent parcels of land. Xmonth/year) Present use of property: residential Zoning District:__ other (specify). APPLICANT Name vPi Address:, /i: Phone (home) Phone (work)^/Z— J3L^^9 ^0 ,_____Zip:_jX£A2/ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Address7/VV9 City: Phone (home) Li 2,- y7t/^9oJ tj Phone (work) /Oa-y\.f^________ Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in det^l Estimated Construction Cost $ 1*J< tyiLjLjst" \mA}rtp^ to- hfCi^iAAQJL 0(|u (attach ^dKional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: ___Lot Width Front Sid( Hardcover ___Lot Coverage Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or compliance with Zoning Code requirements: 3PERTY CONDITIONS or unusual property conditions preventii^ (attach additional sheets if necessary) M. ^ .. tf i < 6 't 1^--fr ■ > ; 't i": /K^ >< • CC'I^) 1 T •*?s ■• •i.5’ » »•. *» I \‘ , . ...^ 'LTv. 'rA ; ■ VUSittf' f 1. ( r...... * ,^J' ^ r Tf--*-... y -<%._• f / V ^ • : '! 'I •!> •* j o V ■ > rf' • i - t I lit Ml |4 I . Hi. »• I H 1 U #:> 1 2VT4S»0 i S P- 02 f. 5 r iv- >■• t. f ILVRDCOVSR CAL ^01^*) SCTBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)75-230'230-500'500-1000' fC wappcqver in zo?nce A. Kousa - X UagOi B. G«a|e X X X X XC Drfvwv -j- -T . I >0- C*6.>(. ii. /.«r xCurCj D. SMaanOc B. PillQ/DKk . Ti/n]^r /?c, P. T. tPdwqie Uodirlafai By Ptntic X X X X X % X G. Other Pact: ^ W TOTAL HARDCOVER W ZONE AR^ IN 20^ X 100 fRQPOStn HARPCQVtR m Z< A. Houk _____________ f'Jlo <:2.\-V/s-vJg^^ U WMtti B. CMf« C. Drivtwty D. Sidewalk E. Pidp/Daek F. Lindtfflipe Uodtriaki By Ptaetk 0. OThflT X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN 20K£ B ___X 100 _________SJ. 5^. SJF. ~ ~SI. ______ss. SI. SJ« _SJ. SJ. SI. 9 A SI. _______SI. _______SJ. _______SJ. SJ. jNlS^si. A SJ. » 7,0(cZ k-0-^ ji.'T l,bfS 0-75 *f" of A • A SJ. SJ. SJ. ,SJ. SJ. SJ. ^SJ. __SJ. ___SJ. _SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. SJ. A SJ. B r ri 1M-- •..n•V tf U / a f I r .4 L bv. • • • ’ « i • M* i i *i I liMlI. Hum r H IE e129T4901S P. 03 .. * ■ SETBACK ZONEt (CIRCLE ONE) ft-Tff HARDCOVER CALCtJLATION WORKSHEET 9&.1S0* y aso-500* rYTCTINC HARt>CftVER IN ZONE A. Hottsa ■ * X X X B. Carat* C Drfvawxy X X D. Bidtmik X X E. Pitio/Dtek X X F. 1 wrtypt UadarUin By Ftartk X X X O. Olhar rAfi^ o^r scil total hardcover in zone f TOTAL property A»EA IN ZONE Ztj(g f B 2.<?. IZH X 100 •1 IN 7.0KT. VMdt X X X B. Oarifa C. Drtvawty X X D. B ^Ti>op ^ B. Pitio«>ack , * ------- -V, 1. JagATTf-t^ « X ----- F. Landscapt Uadcrlaki By Plisdc X X X 500-1000* S.F. SI. SI. SI. SI. nsH SI. SI. SP. SP. SI. SI. SI. SI. SI. e- u. SP. SP. SP. S.F. (o4^.^ SP. 8P. \4^ SI. SP. 5/Z-S.F. SP. SP. SP. SP.- a Odwr rf)rXL x _SP. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZON®^^ .X 100 - -20'i3=^A__SP. B ~ _y^ u H •• It >1 'Tjit •;w cuiwctt \ /V4ii - Mi^c 1•10«*ii • Cuivtal iMf/roao tl«tM« —.—-P«AltA4f l|«C •f■II IMI COfl* CTD tHAf^ fTTI)me oiifeiii MaCI CAlt «*il CD f"—i i.------i •uli0|at • uaOCi COaSta. •CZD tttvCIuACt a COaCftllC HAS cz:tMirviiac root CD ■icatAtiSMAi rACuiti t —IICM O tum o aciC t tiaui iiCMf ■uiiufr Ml ■•Auaoa iiaaAi &■AllftOA* taitCH G CAOuaO COatML • «fat- A MOuM coaiaoiNoait./tfai. ------------------IMCI CMfMt - -----------------l■llal«oul| cQatoua czz>MMISttOa COalOu* ^-Mscuact coatoua Mtf fllfAllOa cr^ !• ftti ) F(X $ § M g jB' OCUISOM S M ■ ^ iiii-i m 1- . 13 • % • . ■ • • *"^ Tdnaier\ . . 'Lake * 6REINTllir*-V4j M_^ f : • T *' . • • , •,•••.•« •••- .• .1^ • • Bay •' ** ■ •••..- ,•• ................................ ‘ . •• Ltfiyetis ^ ^ ^ • .• . • .•V. ,f-S‘•?,* : '.•!• J ' * ? V* 9 :• * * V-- * > ;; H« > • :• • • . M iV.r.‘*v r ’ i * • ••.^ *^ . ftl . .**.• *i*'^T ••'...• / . • * • • U| .XvJ ‘ • * •. • * JEl •• n* 19 '>’^v•-T --r Im -V *■ ‘ ■v>. • . PRONQ 1600 ***/•!*•'.^.; ; ‘ . . ••.. •'y Bracketts Point ■..-' If. • \jV. *. ‘ , • .. •. . • • ■ ■• ■• . . . •• * ■ .V ■•••.' .•. • •' •• • . i • * _•» •• • ■ ■ •k M •! •••..«. -k _ • •• • %w • •. . . w •• • , • • , . • •; • ^ A * • .* SEE MAP 76 fr;V * *• • • V t * • •I *• • .• . • “ . » ' •.*. • . • • c-/I .• • - W . -1 •..•••. t • 6.^ • . .f. . - • .* . - • * •! » # •. I- ‘ •:* • ' • .• ••,•'* .• • ••’ / * » • . •*. ; •• . ■ V: v wfN. • „ rt> ■ . • .. • k • •r• r#* • > I c • •• • •^ •« • • V Lookoui\\ . • Point Q 7}^ Horses}« ^ • . • Vv" .• .. • J :<“.:;i •, • •• : *.... •*,*' kC** .'•*„}*■ '. /••* -V •..*•*••..-j. ; *••3 •>.*•;•■ rv..*- ■ .” .'A ;lr* • • ■ ;* ; '..'/a*- . Gibson*!'•'' •• v: .../••Gbson*s / • # • I Prmmf ^ •. • # • .• r. ■••••*• '•■ •' - • ••* :*•'•*'.■ ♦ • y •. '.•• .• - * •/. ••• • ? • • ^ , • .* • / •. • • • • « • * . I •■: .. • •....>V r-I • • •. • •• •.•. * * Sunset - -'V KIM BATE 12m/99 BATCN SIS NENNEfXN COUMTY EWfErrY IMFOSWATIOM SYSTEH PROrERTY OMNERS LIST CMMEB NME TARPATER NMRE/ABBR St lt*117-2S 11 tM2 •••St ADDRESS UNASSXGNED HCLfOD CNTV RED RAXL AUTH DAKOTA RAXL INC 2t ADAHS ST H HUTCHINSON NN SSS5R PROP ADDR TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR St 1*-117-2S S4 •••• •Mtl DAY RXDBE RO N J JONNSm ISP JOHNSON NXCNAEL J t SUSAN F JO Ittl DAT RXDGE RD NAV2ATA NN SSSTl TOTAL BATCH SIS ••••• 'V- ^, , • 4-r-^ REPORT NO. PX4S5A01 PACE 2 St lt-117-2S SS •••2 •2245 NORTH SHORE DR KINGSLEY H HURPHY JR KINGSLEY H HURPHY JR 2245 NORTH SHORE DR MAYZATA HN 55391 St 14-117-2S 34 •••5 •1449 DAY RXDGE RD G D t D D HESTBY GERALD D t DIANE B MESTBY 1449 DAY RXDGE RD ORONO NN 55S91 St 19-117-2S S4 SttS •147S BAY RXDGE RD T R I H H NCCUNE THOHAS R NCCUNE 147S BAY RXDGE RD MAYZATA HH 55S91 St 19-117-2S S4 ••17 •1425 BAY RXDGE RD SUSAN S TENNEY SUSAN S TEENEY/AC2144442 C/0 NORMEST-N STUKEL-PCS 4TH t HARGUETTE HAC N9S05145 HPLS HN 55479 38 10 117 23 34 ADDRESS PENDING ROY E AHERN COUNTY OF HENNEPIN PUBLIC SERVICE R/W 320 WASHINGTON AVE HOPKINS MN 55343 0011 WORESs” lJAsi?GNEo““^^ ROY E AHERN ROY E AHERN 1120 FRONT ST HUDSON WI 54016 V X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AM ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY lAKATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOMLEDGE AND BELIEF. 0 t n_/ J4> CJ}rp * k 0 V i-V. V.\ q ■i ^ 9 '-r- ’t VliA/C^ • |4^’ PERMIT RECORD Permit No Date Type of Permit ■ ■LJO -L. ■ih? —^-pj:______ ‘5-/~n ( f \x*;ki ‘7 4^(;7ifAhrv H75 “Ss fit& 5-^7 'u'^olQ 2-sea___5 - 7/jJ•6-^7>'SI 7I.AA 1 IlrTT) Fo /ni rr.l 0 1 631Z 7-I-? -^1 ^l/m La nn S''.=e0-77 MlMcdu<JU //O 3l ?*/^e^rO-A- &>F£^r- • t • • • • Ii r \ — A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO ORONO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.56 SUBDIVISION 16(L), CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS PER SECTION 10.03,SUBDIVISIONS 19-21, AND APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT TO WALFRED PROPERTIES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2380 SHADYWOOD ROAD PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.44, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE NO. 2567 WHEREAS, Walfired Properties (hereinafter the "applicant") is owner of the property located at 2380 Shadywood Road located within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 19, 20, 21 and 22, Wiley's Navarre Addition, Lake Minnetonka; and that part of Lot 5, Block 3, Townsite of Langdon Park, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeasterly comer of said Lot 5; thence Northwesterly along the Northerly line of said Lot 5 to the Northeasterly line of the public highway miming across said Lot 5 and known as Minnetonka Lake Park and Maple Plain Road (now County Road No. 19); thence Southeasterly along the Northeasterly line of said road to the Easterly line of Lot 5; thence Northerly along the ^terly line of said Lot 5 to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a building permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.44, Subd. 2 to permit the commercial development of the property that includes die approval of the following variances: Page 1 of 12 L'.. S' i 1. Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L) - Hardcover variance: A. 500-1000' (North portion of property): Zone area = 36,150 s.f. +, Proposed Hardcover = _______s.f. jh =% Allowed Hardcover = 35% = 12,650 s.f. +. B.500-1000' (South portion of property): Zone area = 10,100 s.f. jf Proposed Hardcover = _______s.f.+ =% Allowed Hardcover = 35 % = 3,535 s.f. ±, WHEREAS, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on March 20, 2000 and recommended approval by a vote of 3 to 2 of the development plans per the commercial site plan, building elevations, and landscape plan prepared by Paramount Engineering & Design; and WHEREAS, the City Council on April 10, 2(X)0 reviewed the recommendations of the staff. Planning Commission, Park Commission and City Engineer and voted unanimously to return the site plan review to the Planning Commission for further study; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the revised application on April 17, 2000 and reconunended unanimous approval of the revised site plans subject to the applicants revise the pedestrian access to the property and landscaping plan to permit a trail to connection between Olive Avenue and Shadywood Road and eliminate the trail that was proposed along the east boundary; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council makes the following findings in regard to this application: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2567. Page 2 of 12 2. if 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. The property is located in the B-5 Limited Neighborhood Business District requiring 20,000 s.f. in area. The property consists of 85,000 s.f. The development plans include an 11,900 s.f. one-story retail building proposed for a Snyder’s Drugstore. The total floor area that can be utilized for retail space is 9,000 s.f. based on the parking requirements. "Drug Stores" are not a permitted or conditional use in the B-5 zoning district. The applicants have requested an amendment to the B-5 district that would permit or conditionally permit drug stores. Per Section 10.61, Subd. 10, required off-street parking is approved as follows: Retail = 1 stall per each 150 s.f. of net floor area 9,000 s.f. net floor area -5- 150 s.f. = 60 spaces The stormwater retention pond located at the rear of the property will be expanded to accommodate surface runoff from this site. All surface runoff will be directed via underground storm sewers to this stormwater retention area before discharging to the designated wetland to the southeast of the property. Applicant ’s development of the proposed site plan is dependent upon completion of the vacation of a portion of Navarre Lane as originally agreed to by the City. A trail connection is required to connect Olive Avenue to Shadywood Road around the north side of the property and as shown on the site plan dated _____________, by Tom Reinen, Reinen Architects. The property abuts the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District to the north and east. Adjacent and nearby property owners were legally notified of the public hearing for this project and were given opportunity to speak at that hearing. Page 3 of 12 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. The site is requires significant filling and grading to accommodate the proposed improvements. The proposed site grading plans have been reviewed by staff, the City Engineer, the Planning Commission, Park Commission and the City Council and have been found to be generally appropriate for development of this site, subject to adjustments to be made via a final grading plan which will have to be approved by the City prior to issuance of a building permit. Structural coverage on the site is proposed at 14%, meeting the 15% limitation on lot coverage by structures. The property has a unique shape and is a 'through* lot, abutting Olive Avenue to the rear and Shadywood Road (County Road 19) on the front. The orientation of the building is toward Shadywood Road, minimizing any commercial appearance or activity as viewed from Olive Avenue, except the drive through lane is on the north side of the building. Landscaping and buffering is required to fully screen the drive through and any loading areas on this portion of the property. The proposed hardcover variance is mitigated by the fact that all surface runoff from tlie site will be directed to a stormwa :r retention (NURP) pond designed to enhance the quality of runoff waters prior to their discharge from the site. The magnitude of hardcover variance is further justified by the fact that less than 1 percent of the City's shoreland areas are devoted to commercial uses, hence the overall impact of the excess hardcover created by commercial uses is relatively minor, especially when such impacts are mitigated by stormwater treatment facilities. Further, the parking requirements do not make it possible to develop commercial properties that would not exceed the allowed hardcover in most shoreland areas. The proposed site plan, landscape plan and building design incorporate features and elements which make this development appropriate for the B-S District, especially in relation to its adjacency to an existing residential neighborhood. Such features and elements include orientation of the building toward Shadywood Road with no vehicular access to the site from Olive Avenue or Page 4 of 12 I'V Navarre Lane, eliminating neighborhood traffic concerns; sufficient setback and vegetative buffering along the Olive Avenue boundary and the northerly boundary of the site; creation of a pedestrian pathway through the site to allow the neighborhood easy access to the commercial areas in Navarre. 15. The Council finds that the brick facade proposed is acceptable per Zoning Code Section 10.45 Subdivision 6G(le;. 16. The signage on the property is limited to 381 s.f. based on the total lineal frontage on Shady wood Road. The building plans submitted indicate the proposed signage meets the requirements of Section 10.61. 17. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances and conditional use permits on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 18. The Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the requested variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning C^e and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 19. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit for land alteration and allowing a drug store as a conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 5 of 12 I CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the commercial site plan, building elevations and landscape plan referenced above and approves the variances as requested based on the unique findings and hardships noted in this resolution a conditional use permit for grading; a conditional use permit for a drug store; and approves the City's issuing a building permit for the proposed Snyder ’s Drug Store (for the site plan attached as Exhibit A) to Walfred Properties subject to the following conditions; 1.Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall provide the following information for the review and approval by the City Engineer and Department of Public Works: A.Plans and specifications for service line connections around the proposed NURP pond. As-built plans shall be provided to the City upon completion. The Public Works Department shall review any potential problems associated with additional cover placed over existing water or sewer mains, especially in conjunction with the vacated portions of Navarre Lane. All utility improvements shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works and the City Engineer. B Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan showing existing and proposed contours, building locations, elevations, stormwater pond, utilities and erosion control measures to be used during construction. A building permit cannot be issued until the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has approved the stormwater plans. C.Engineering details and design must be provided for the proposed retaining walls. 2.The City Council shall vacate the portions of Navarre Lane to provide utility, parking and storm water treatment space on the property. Prior to any building permits being approved the applicant shall provide easements acceptable to the City Attorney for use of the east 33' of Navarre Lane that Page 6 of 12 i I -' I would be vacated in favor of the Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association. Easements shall permit utilities and drainage over the entire width of the right of way. 3. The sidewalk connection to Olive Avenue as shown on the approved site plan shall be constructed and maintained permanently by applicant/property owner to provide pedestrian access through the site between Shadywood Road and Olive Avenue. Applicant shall grant a 12' wide trail easement to connect Olive Avenue and Shadywood Road as shown on the approved site plan. It is the intent of the City that although the City is being granted such easements, the walkway within applicant's property shall be maintained by the property owner, not the City. All upkeep, maintenance and snow removal activity shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 4. The parking lot shall be paved with concrete curb and gutter, driving lanes within parking lot shall have a 9-ton pavement section for trucks. A geotechnical evaluation of the soil shall be done in conjunction with the pavement design and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. 5. Applicants' architect shall submit final development plans to the Metro Council Environmental Services to determine the exact number of SAC units to be charged at the time of the issuance of a building permit. The City will also determine if additional Sewer and Water Unit Adjustment Charges and system upgrade connection charges will be required for the new development, to be paid by applicant prior to issuance of the building permit. 6. Appropriate traffic and parking signage shall be installed subject to the Orono staff and City Engineer's review. 7. The landscape areas as shown on the above referenced site plan shall consist of grass wherever feasible and shall adhere to the above referenced Revised Landscape Plan dated_____________in regards to planting species, sizes and locations. 8. Site frontage for commercial signage calculation will be limited to the frontage Page 7 of 12 r along Shady wood Road, being 381 feet in length. Signage for this site shall be regulated by the provisions of Zoning Code Section 10.61. Subd. 1, Subd. 3(A) and Subd. 3(D). No commercial signage will be allowed along the facade of the building facing Olive Avenue except as minimally needed to identify service entrances to buildings, and as needed for the drug store drive thru. The sign plan provided with the final plan set completed by Tom Reinen, Reinen Architects dated__________is approved. Any changes to the sign plan for the property may require additional review. 9. Final lighting plan shall be suej'^rt to City staff approval and shall locate lighting so as to direct lights away from the adjacent residential neighborhood. 10. No future business shall have a public entrance through the rear (Olive Avenue side) of the building. 11. No formal approval for shared parking agreements between this property and adjacent commercial properties has been approved for this site. 12. Erosion control shall adhere to "Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas". All erosion controls as required by the City shall be in place prior to commencing excavation on the site. The stormwater pond construction shall be substantially completed and functional prior to construction of building footings. 13. The City Engineer shall complete a estimate of improvement costs, including but not limited to landscaping, grading, erosion control, utilities, pavement, trails, retaining walls and pond/outlet control structure construction and the applicant shall submit to the City a financial guarantee of 150% of the improvement costs subject to a Developer’s Agreement being executed by the developer and City of Orono. 14. Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicant shall provide suitable evidence of property ownership acceptable to the City Attorney. 15. Drainage and Utility Easements shall be granted to the City of Orono 10’ along all exterior property lines and 5' along the interior property line. Page 8 of 12 :■? T 1^- L -3^- - •...-^;------------------------------------■ 16.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owners, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit within one year of the date of Council’s approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (June 12, 2001). 17.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 18.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of June, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) Property Owner(s) Page 9 of 12 \ A.T?y/L-3cr.s- £------rrfm-r 1 a Ml I a.. —' 'tif I I -■Ir’*! ■■1 • /•X4 FE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. NTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of 10, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and said instrument was executed on behalf of :ity. Notary Public TE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. JNTY OF HENNEPIN ) this lie within _____^day of_____ and for said ________, 20 __ before me a Notary county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described nd who executed the foregoing instrumentT and acknowledged that he(they) executed the e as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 10 of 12 tary red bed the -- h j i '*.1,^ D A RESOLUTION VACATING AN UNIMPROVED LANE WITHIN THE PLATS OF "WILEY’S NAVARRE ADDITION", "TOWNSITE OF LANGDON PARK " AND "LAFAYETTE RIDGE " IN THE CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FILE NO. 2567 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on February 16, 2000, Walfred Properties (hereinafter the "applicant") filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of an unimproved public right-of-way adjacent to their property and originally dedicated in the plats of "Wiley ’s Navarre Addition", "Townsite of Langdon Park" and "Lafayette Ridge" Hennepin County, Minnesota legally described as follows: Attached as “Exhibit A” WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held by the Orono Planning Commission on March 20, 2000, regarding said vacation and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2000 the Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the vacation in conjunction with approval of a commercial site plan review proposed by the applicant; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in consideration of the following findings: 1. 2. 3. The lane has never been developed for any public purpose. The lane does not provide access to any adjoining or nearby properties. This unimproved right-of-way contains municipal sewer, water, gas and telephone utilities. That will be relocated to permit pond construction for a retail use Page 1 of 3 i .'I •ft f ;'k ■%. '■< r. [¥. fn. -r ii; !?»if m^. r building on the property to the west. Utilities would remain by granting of an easement in favor of the City of Orono. 4.The City does not intend to use the lane for any public purpose other than utility and drainage. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of Walfred Properties is hereby granted by the Council of the City of Orono and that the unimproved lane leg^ly described above is hereby vacated subject to the following condition: A.The vacation will not be recorded without the underlying property owners granting above mentioned drainage and utility easements. Such easements shall be submitted in a format acceptable to the City Attorney. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on June 12, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of June, 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 2 of 3 1 I, Page 3 of 3 C^tM«»naA Aim .V ‘ "r 'V Application Date: 3/15/00 Completion Date: 3/15/00 Deadline: 7/12/00 JUN 1 2 2000 CUY ur unui^u REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 1,2000 ITEM NO.: if Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2569 W. Duncan MacMillan and William Waldron I860 Fox Street After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit Zoning:RR-IB. One Family Rural Residential. 2 Acre Minimum lot size Application:After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit to permit excavation of greater than 500 cubic yards of fill to dredge a pond. List of Exhibits: A Resolution/Survevm B Notice of Planning Commission Action C Planning Commission Minutes (May 15,2000) D Planning Report (April 17,2000) Application Summary: In February the City of Orono became aware of a pond that was being dredged on a property owned by William Waldron at 1700 Fox Street. The pond was dredged by the property owner to the south for a natural pond within a wetland area. Because the pond required greater than 500 cubic yards of excavation a conditional use permit is required. The wetland area is mostly a Type I wetland, and not a City protected wetland. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission reviewed the Conditional Use Permit application on May 15, 2000 and recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0 based on the following conditions being met by the applicant: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Applicant applies for a land alteration permit. A protective covenant is filed in the chain of title of the affected properties as an advisory to property owners the wetland is subject to WCA regulation. A final as built survey, indicating finished elevations of the pond is submitted to the City and accepted by the City Engineer. Verification a MCWD permit has been approved for the pond construction. Conservation and Flowage Easement granted over the protected area to ensure restoration of natural vegetation. xia JMc ) r, k ■ ' ■ t: 1 - ■, i'^ i -»' •I i.N I /»„• Staff Recommendation: To adopt the attached resolution approving a conditional use permit subject to the conditions noted by the Planning Commission. Council Action Requested: To adopt or amend the attached resolution. I if II i ) ■? I i. 1 f¥' A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN AFTER THE FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19-21 FILE #2569 it ?. L- WHEREAS, William Waldron and Craigbank Associates, (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the properties located at 1880 Fox Street and 1700 Fox Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; Lot 1, Block 1, Waldron Addition also that part of south 1/2 of northwest 1/4 of southeast 1/4 lying westerly of Waldron Addition except roads, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property") and The northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th principal meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for an after the fact conditional use permit to permit excavation of greater than 500 cubic yards for a pond construction within a non-Orono protected wetland per Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21. WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 15,2000 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS Page 1 of 7 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2569. The properties are located in the RR-IB Zoning District. A small open water pond did exist prior to the expansion. It is not clear whether the pond was natural or was dredged. The pond was located at the south end of a non-Orono wetland. In 1974 the City of Orono defined certain wetlands that were primarily Types 3, 4, 5 and 6 as protected. Those wetlands identified by the City of Orono are protected and no land alteration is permitted within the wetland and the 26' around the wetland. Expansion of the pond occurred in a wetland that the City has not identified as protected. No variance is required for the expansion. City of Orono Staff observed on February 14, 2000 that excavation had occurred on properties located at 1880 Fox Street and 1700 Fox Street for construction of pond without obtaining permits from the City of Orono. The Planning Commission reviewed the conditional use permit request and recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0 based on the following findings: A. The pond has not added any fill or decreased the storage capacity of the wetland. B C. The applicants will enter into an agreement to ensure full restoration of natural vegetation around the pond. The property owners have agreed to grant a ^ onservation and flowage easement over the entire wetland area, to include die pond. The proposed conditional use is in accordance with all other provisions of the Municipal Code. • -r 6. D. All excavated material was removed from the property at the time of construction. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to permit excavation of greater than 500 cubic yards for a pond construction within a non-Orono Page 2 of 7 It protected wetland per Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21 will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, will not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 7.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants an after the fact conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21, to permit excavation of greater than 500 cubic yards for construction of a pond, subject to the following conditions: 1. Pond shall remain as shown on the survey dated March 17, 2000. A copy is attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. 2.A protective covenant shall be filed in the chain of title of the affected properties as an advisory to property owners the wetland is subject to WCA regulation. 3.A final as built survey, indicating finished elevations of the pond, shall be submitted to the City and accepted by the City Engineer. Applicants shall provide verification of a MCWD permit that has been approved for the pond construction. 5.A Conservation and Flowage Easement granted over the protected area to ensure restoration of natural vegetation. Page 3 of 7 f^J .!... V 'i : 6. Authorities granted by this resolution are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a land alteration permit within one year of the date of Council approval or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (June 12, 2(X)1). 7.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of June, 2(XK). ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner(s) Property Owner(s) i 4 Page 4 of 7 . ■ . Y « ■y/' ’ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of June, 2000, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) day of , 20___before me a Notary PublicOn this______________ within and for said county, personally appeared___________________________*________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) day of , 20___before me a Notary PublicOn this______________ within and for said county, personally appeared___________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 7 ■f j STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 20 ___before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) I On this day of , 20 ___before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 6 of 7 JLbl I:- ■ rv . EXHIBIT A HeuJ Por\d Lux MOJCCr HO. «uoo^ Page 7 of 7 \V ’ in CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay^ MN 55323 PHONE:(952)249-4600 FAX:(952)249-4616 ZONING FILE #2569 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: May 17,2000 TO:Mark Buetow 177 Meadow Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 COPIES TO: William Waldron 1880 Fox Street Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Variance 2 _Conditional Use Permit ___Subdivision Other DATE OF MEETING: May 15,2000 VOTE: 5 FOR AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted ^_Approval subject to conditions noted below ___Denial for reasons noted below ___Tabled for reasons noted below ___No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of Application #2569 based on Additional information requested, as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Applicant applies for a land alteration permit. A protective covenant is filed in the chain of title of the affected properties as an advisory to property owners the wetland is subject to WCA regulation. A final as built survey, indicating finished elevations of the pond is submitted to the City and accepted by the City Engineer. Verification a MC>^ permit has been approved for the pond construction. Conservation and Flowage Easement granted over the protected area to ensure restoration of natural vegetation. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the meeting is May 31, 2000 to remain on the agenda for the Monday, June 12, 2000 City Council meeting. If you have trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (249-4600). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. PIIAFT: V , I i ■" I »^. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May IS, 2000 ROLL: The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Chair Sandra Smith, Dale Lindquist, Janice Berg, Jay Nygard, and VVilliam Stoddard. Commissioners Elizabeth Hawn and Daniel Kluth were absent. The following represented City Staff: Senior Planning Coordinator Mike Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paui Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, and Recorder Jackie Young. City Council Representative Bob Sansevere was present. Acting Chair Smith called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. OLD BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS (#1) #2569 W. DUNCAN MACMILLAN AND WILLIAM WALDRON, 1860 FOX STREET, AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 6:31 p.m. - 6:43 p.m. Mark Vlev^eau, Caretaker for the Applicants, appeared. Weinberger stated the City became aware in February or March that there had been excavation of a pond iocated on 1700 Fox Street. The pond was actually constructed by the property owner to the south in a cooperative effort between the two property owners. The survey indicates the pond is actually located across the east property line, writh Craigbank Associates being the owner of the second property this pond has impacted. Weinberger staled an after-the-fact conditional use permit Is required, with no variance being necessary for the pond since it is not located within a City protected wetland. Weinberger noted some portions of the wetland are possibly iocated within an area considered to be Type I wetlands, which does require a wetland permit. Typically the Watershed District will review these applications following preliminary approval by the City. Weinberger stated since the land alteration is greater than 500 cubic yards and the dredging occurred over a property line, a conditional use permit Is required. Weinberger indicated since the area has been dredged and not filled, the pond will not impact drainage in the area. Should the City approve the conditional use permit, the wetland shall be subject to a protective covenant Page 1 k- Nv m ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 15,2000 filed In the chain of title of the affected property to serve as an advisory to the current and future property owners that the wetland is subject to WCA regulation. City Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit subject to the following conditions; 1. Applicant applies for a land alteration permit. 2. A protective covenant is filed In the chain of title of the affected properties as an advisory to property owners that the wetland is subject to WCA regulation. 3. A final as built survey indicating finished elevations of the pond Is submitted to the City and accepted by the City Engineer. 4. Verification that a MCWD permit has been approved for the pond construction. Mark Viewteau, 177 Meadow Lane, indicated he has been employed by the MacMillans for the past 11 years as their caretaker. Smith inquired whether he wished to add anything to Staffs report. Viewteau indicated this project was basically a beautification project to clean up the area. Smith inquired wrhat future plans the applicant has for this area in terms of how it will be maintained and what type of vegetation will be planted in this area. Viewteau stated the Applicant would like to keep this area fairly natural, with some steps being taken to prevent the banks from eroding. Viewteau indicated they are willing to work with City Staff prior to commencing any future work in the area. Smith inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to enter into an agreement regarding the vegetation in this area. Weinberger stated typically the City allows the natural vegetation to restore itself in the area, which a majority of it has. Weinberger indicated the granting of easements in the area would also protect it from future vegetation removal and land alteration. Smith commented the City of Orono likes its residents to have a respect for the natural environment and to avoid the placement of rocks along the banks. Smith inquired whether the Page 2 rM rm . m n/4 .r ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 15,2000 Applicant would have any problems with the conditions listed in the report. Viewteau indicated he was fine with the conditions. There were no pubitc comments regarding this application. Stoddard inquired what the City's policy was concerning item 5 under the Wetland Alteration Guidelines. Weinberger indicated the pond has been constructed in a low area located within the wetlands and probably does not meet all the criteria. Stoddard commented he does not understand how they can excavate a small portion of a larger wetland. Weinberger stated the wetland is a non*protected wetland as defined by the City o- Orono. City Staff will need to check with the Watershed District whether they have any issues with this pond. Gaffron stated the City generally will not approve a conditional use permit for a decorative pond in a City-protected wetland unless such pond Is designed to meet minimum wildlife habitat specifications. Gaffron stated since this is a non-protected wetland, the guidelines would generally not apply to this pond. Stoddard requested that Item 5 be reviewed in the future. Smith encouraged the Applicant to keep this pond as a natural vegetative area. Viewteau indicated he does not have a problem with that. Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2569, W. Duncan MacMillan and William Waldron, 1860 Fox Street, for an After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit to allow for after-the-fact dredging of a pond in excess of 500 cubic yards, subject to the four conditions outlined in the April 17, 2000 Planner's Report. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS (#4) #2578 DAVID AND LORRAINE LUNDBERG, 900 DAKOTA AVENUE - VARIANCE, Page 3 tlMfiiii "ill ift ll i Hie n i 4. I' 'j ip. k Ilk P / TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner April 17,2000 #2569 W. Duncan MacMillan and William Waldron 1860 Fox Street After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit Zoning:RR-IB, One Family Rural Residential, 2 Acre Minimum lot size Application: After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit to permit excavation of greater than 500 cubic yards of fill to dredge a pond. Lbt of Exhibits: A B C D E F G H Wetland Alteration Guidelines: Pond Excavation Letter to property owner (Dated February 29,2000) Application Site Survey Plat Map Property Owners Notification List City Topographic Map City Protected Wetland Map Application Summary: Several weeks ago the City of Orono became aware of a pond that was being dredged on a property owned by William Waldren at 1700 Fox Street. The pond was dredged by the property owner to the south for a natural pond.________________________________ I;’-ANALYSIS Pertinent Code Sections: Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19-21 require a conditional use permit for land alteration activities greater than 500 cubic yards. ^1^2569 W. Duncan MacMillan and William Waldron I860 Fox Street After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit April17. 2000 pagt-l Surrounding Properties: The survey indicates the land alteration is located across the east property line. Craigbank Associates is the owner of the second property this pond has impacted. Mr. MacMillan is a percentage ow ner of that lot. Mr. MacMillan also owns the property located south of the pond. Existing topography restricts any view of the pond from other adjacent properties or the road. Preexisting pond: A small open water pond did exist, as shown on the site survey prior to the expansion. It is not clear whether the pond was natural or was dredged. The pond was located at the south end of anon-Orono wetland. In 1974 the City of Orono defined certain wetlands that were primarily Types 3,4, 5 and 6 as protected. Those wetlands identified by the City of Orono are protected and no land alteration is permitted within the wetland and the 26' around the wetland. Expansion of the pond occurred in a wetland that the City has not identified as protected. No variance is required for the expansion. Conditional Use Permit Standards: Section 10.09 Standards for Granting of a Conditional Use Permit The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a conditional use permit as the use permit was applied for or in modified form, if on the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, tlie City makes the following findings: 1. 2. 3. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and Comprehensive Municipal Plan. The Conditional Use is for land alteration of greater than 500 cubic yards. The land alteration has occurred in a wetland that is not an Orono protected wetland, therefore not requiring any variances. That the proposed location of ilic conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detri**'vital to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; No fill has been placed within the wetland to change its capacity and normal water level. Staff has requested additional information regarding the grades within the pond. The depth at the ponds edge and center had not been provided as of the time of this report. It is believed the pond has a maximum depth of 6-7 feet. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter. /^2569 W. Duncan MacMillan and William W'aldron 1860 Fox Street After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit Apriin, 2000 page-2 ^mTu^rnuPiir^rfjfri}nwnmmiML [•WtTOlsTO rtw*ro] •TWi R1 tiWi • m 3T;-a -.J 'iliTO iWiTil *:T • 1 •]F^TTi inir^araii RTiWiTtlWil# •IiliItHtl [ijiltllftt]^rfiTtntTiTtiirt] nrsTira \:.:1 •f A CITYof ORONO Municipal Offlces Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 Wetland Alteration Guidelines: Excavation of Ponds 1. Excavation of ponds in upland areas (not within nor within 26’ of a Type 1 thru Type 8 wetland) requires a staff-issued land alteration permit if not more than 500 cubic yards, and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) if more than 500 cubic yards. Such grading may require a permit fom the MCWD. 2. Excavation of a pond in a WCA wetland that is not a City-protected wetland, will require MCWD approval as well as a City land alteration permit (and a CUP if over 500 c.y.), and may require U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approval. 3. Excavation of a pond in or with".; 26' of a City-protected wetland, will require* a Variance and Conditional Use Permit approval regardless of the amount of excavation; likely wil' ^ quire MCWD and Corps approval; and may require DNR approval if it is a DNR-protected wetland. 4. City approval of pond e.xcavations will take into account the applicable rK ^-uiierr’cnfs and review considerations as defined in Zoning Code Sections 10.55 and 10.56. 5. The City will generally not approve a Var/CUP application for a decorative pond in City-protected wetlands unless such pond is designed to meet minimum wildlife habitat specifications, which generally include: - Pond surface area of at least 2500 s.f - 10:1 perimeter bench to a 1' depth - Depth of approximately 4-5' - Excavating a small portion of a larger wetland 6. Approval for ponds excavated in City-protected wetlands will normally require the use of erosion control measures, vegetation restoration, and the granting of a conservation and flowage easement to the City. 7. Information required in order to make application for a Var/CUP for pond excavation includes but is not limited to: Complete General Land Use Application with fee/property owner list/plat map Property survey - Wetland delineation report (must use a professional delineator) Grading plan (existing and proposed contours) Vegetation restoration plan Indication of spoil disposal site Olossary:WCA: Wetlands Conservation Act MCWD: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District DNR: Minnesota Department 01 Natural Resources var: variance CUP: Conditional Use Permit Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 4734)510 i • r. .. ■ i Kv r\%i- tvf r-- ■ CITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley ParVway Orono, MN 55356 Mailinf Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 February 29,2000 William Waldron 1860 Fox Street Wayzata, Mn 55391 Dear Mr. Waldron: On a recent building inspection, it was noted that there was excavation and grading occurring in a wetland. On February 14,2000, a field inspector from the city went out and took pictures of the site. The pond excavated on the property appears to also encroach on 1700 Fox Street. Typically, a five foot setback is required from property lines for any land alteration or grading. The land alteration, as performed on the property, requires permits from the City of Orono. It is also likely a conditional permit will be required. There are two options for the site. One option would be complete restoration of the impacted wetland back to its original state. The second option would be an after-the-fact conditional use permit for land alteration for the pond. The following information is required in order to make an after-the-fact permit request: 1. Complete after-the-fact conditional use permit application and S500 application fee. 2. Certified property owners list, plat map and mailing labels for all properties with 350 of your property. This information is available from the Hennepin County Department of Finance. You can contact their office at (612) 348-5910. 3. Welland Delineation Report (Must use a professional delineator) 4. Grading plan showing previous and existing contours shall be shown on a certificate of survey indicating the change in grade on the property. Telephoue (612) 249-4600 • Fax (612) 249-4616 .. II in , r* t rrjt. J.. r “ fv 1 J,.r^ / 5. Indication of spoil disposal site and the total amount of spoils removed in cubic yards. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) may also require a permit for the land alteration. Please contact Jim Ha&er at (612) 471-0590 to discuss the requirements of the MCWD permit process.. The next land use application deadline is noon on March 22, 2000 to appear on the AprU 17, 2000 Planning Commission Agenda. Attached is a conditional use permit (CUP) application form. The application must be completed and submitted with all information stated above by noon on March 22, 2000 or the wetland must be completely restored to its original state. Failure to do either will result in the City initiating legal action. Please contact myself or Chris Pence at your earliest convenience to further discuss this matter. Our number is (612) 249-4600. Respectfully, Paul Weinberger Zoning Administrator/Planner • Enclosure: CUP Application Form Lyle Oman, Building Official Chris Pence, Field Inspector Jim Hafner, MCWD Mrs. John H. MacMillan, 1700 Fox Street Duncan MacMillan, 1820 Fox Street 1^ i'- h . -V I ■ c Application # ^S(o ^ Date Receive<r s/^vAo Amount Paid ^ S CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address I^GO p-QK 0F~_______________________________ Type of Application to be Filed Q»UP 4U a -P^ct j Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Q3"/l"7 “ QQOy APPLICANT Phone (home) Name /YlA^tTlllWn Phone (work) Address I tA /. yVOO ^/^Citv __Zip. OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) y?3 Name L .fJ,^/)LOf^dA/ Phone (work) Address /tvfo Date Property Acquired City Zip / ________________________(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _____$ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____$175.00 Residential Accessory Use _____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _____$300.00 Commercial/Industrial Use X $250.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain X Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining vvalls^within 75' of l^eshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _____$250.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (-i- consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation _____$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) _____$350.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule kf. '- ^ r- f ■ ['''k ■ ■ Vf'i kl^ r-: i- ■ I • /' • *• • / BlPt I' Wfcl I ri'iBiM I .. MM MTI fS/14/«t MTCM sn TAXTAYtR' NMK/AOMI St tS-117-2S 31 iMl •M4S mOHN ItO S me N SMITH ETAL TVANETTE SMITH AAS MMMM HO S LONO LAKE MN SSS54. HENNEPIN COUNTY PKOPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 3t RS-llY-aS 31 Rita •MAS tROMN RD S BEVERLY SMITH SILBERHANN BEVERLY SILBERHANN AA5 BROWN RO S WAYZATA NN 5B391 REPORT NO. P1AS5A01 PACE 1 SB tS-117-2S 31 MBS 0B5S5 BROWN RD S P J S T A HILL PETER J t THEIA A HILL 505 BROWN RO S LONE LAKE HN 55S5A ' OIRIiR NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ABBR SB 0S*117-2S 31 OOBB B212B . FOX ST C R KRANTZ ETAL CURTIS R KRANTZ 2120 FOX ST LONO LAKE HN 55354 SB 03-117-23 34 BBI3 B2BB0 WEBBER HILLS RO K N KRUEBER A P K KRUECER TR KEVIN N KRUEBER 2B9B WEBBER HILLS RO WAYZATA NN 55301 SB 03-117-23 34 0014 02000 WEBBER HILLS RO J 0 HOUB 0 S B HOUB JANES D I SUSAN B HOUB 2000 WEBBER HILLS RO WAYZATA NN 55391 C"f ! '1 ' " PROP AOOR TAXPAYER NANE/ABOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ABOR S'OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ABOR SB 0S-117-2S S4 0015 02040 WEBBER MILLS RO K R B S IBNATIUS KERRY R IBNATIUS 2040 WEBBER HILLS RD WAYZATA HN 55391 SB 0S-117-2S 42 0002 OIBBO FOK ST WILLIAM L WALDRON WILLIAM L WALDRON IBBO FOX ST WAYZATA HN 55391 SB 0S-117-2S 42 0009 01B20 FOX ST W DUNCAN MACMILLAN TRUSTEE W DUNCAN MACMILLAN 1B20 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 SB 03-117-23 41 0003 01700 FOX ST CRAIBBANK ASSOCIATES CRAIBBANK ASSOCIATES PO BOX 9300 DEPT 20 MPLS HN 55440 30 03-117-23 42 0007 01040 FOX ST WILLIAM L WALDRON WILLIAM L WALDRON 1000 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 50 03-117-23 42 0012 00440 BROWN RO S J B 0 L F NASSOPUST JOHN B NASSOPUST CITY CENTER SUITE 4400 S3 S 4TH ST MPLS HN 55402 SO 03-117-23 41 0005 0003S ADDRESS UNASSI6NED LONBRIDBE ASSOC LONBRIDBE ASSOC C/O ROBERT J THEILER P 0 BOX 5420 MPLS MN 55440-5420 30 03-117-23 42 0000 01040 FOX ST JOHN C SKOBLUND TRUSTEE JOHN C SKOBLUND C/O BAKER MANABEMENT 00 BTH «T S B4900 MPLS MN 55402 SO 05-117-25 42 0015 00050 ADDRESS UNASSI6NEO JOHN B 0 LINDA F NASSOPUST JOHN B 0 LINDA F NASSOPUST CITY CENTER SUITE 4400 55 4TH ST S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 m TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SB 05-117-25 42 0014 0005B ADDRESS UNASSIBIffiO JOHN B t LINDA F NASSOPUST JOHN B 0 LINDA F NASSOPUST CITY CENTER SUITE 4400 55 4TN ST S MINNEAPOLIS HN 65402 SO 05-117-25 43 0001 00050 ADDRESS UNASSIBNEO SUAD H AZHARl SUAO H AZHARl 1745 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55591 50 03-117-25 45 0002 01925 FOX ST J WABSTROH ASHDOWN WATSON J WABSTROH ASHDOWN WATSON 1925 FOX ST WAYZATA NN 55591 • r:;.r:.r;v r.{i M AR ? c m Qi IY Ui* uriUNO MM BATf •B/M/tt BATCH BBl M BS-UT-ZB 45 BBBB •MBA BMMM BO S n J OTT B S B OTT HICHAEL J OTT MB BBONN BO S MAVZATA MN BfSBl ?<■ If«r ■ HENNEPIN COUNTY PBOPEBTV INFOBHATIOH SYSTEM PBOPERTV OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI4SS401 PACE 2 TOTAL BATCH SBl BBOIB I.. t I f ■ ■■ migm 5.SSK.SS; OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPAUHEHT OF PROPEBJY TAXATION^ TO THE BEST OP HY KHOHLEOGE AND BELIEF. I'v * !''S V. m ■ \ ! II Vi > ' la MC \i\\l m ‘ ^' EllEl mi \ ]1 i ^ * / ■ ■. *' I* ’ t. .»r » > r.-' ♦>f. ” . «•' If•’tv;-'itiV., V", •...:•>■ V* • r<> V*V. '.'/ V.: mmi ?S55vAf:'^ w. • '.•• I'F ' ' ••'It » -Ja VrV%-V§ i»® ■ ■ ■•^- '»/-• ; '* ■ K ■ jdh3iMCTy»g^... < 'Jk .-s* ■.'bvSfe IP j k • «•«&■• •• - . ■ ■••• ft i W^m p»i'«Kfel •* . * F *1 . ' L* ? • r- r.r r Application Date:4/17/00 msetinq ^ 20001:Completion Date:4/17/00 60 Day Deadline:6/16/00 Cll Y Or 1^- *: t.-‘ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 6/12/00 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2581 John and Kristin Gehring 1687 Concordia Street Variances Zoning District: Lot Area: LR'IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 Acre) 14,3l3s.f. (.33 acre) List of Exhibits: A B C D E F Mike GafFron Memo to Council 6-1-2000 Resolution Notice of Planning Commission Action Planning Commission Revisions Submitted by Applicant Draft minutes from Planning Commission (5/15/2000) Staff Report and Exhibits of 5/15/2000 Application: Property owners have proposed to tear down an existing residence and build a new residence in approximately the same location on the lot. The proposal involves moving the new residence back a few feet to be more in alignment with adjacent properties, and behind the average lakeshore setback line. While the new house will be conforming to side yard setbacks, the structure will be located only 42' from the lakeshore. Hardcover excesses already exist on the property. The Planning Conunission recommended approval of this application with the recommendation that hardcover must reamain at what currently exists-3,384 s.f., hence 151 s.f. must be removed from the plan presented at the Planning Commission meeting. This has been accomplished by removing the dog kennel, sidewalk by dog kennel and making the proposed sidewalk smaller. Requested Variances Include: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 : Lakeshore Setback: To permit a lakeshore setback of 42' where 75' is required. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(1): Hardcover in 0-75' Setback Area: To permit 1,012 s.f (26.7%) of hardcover where 0 s.f(0%) is allowed and 999 s.f (26.3%) exists. ir K -1 ■ ■i V- PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 5 to 0 vote to: Approve the application as presented, except hardcover calculations be kept at 3,384 s.f. (Removing 151 s.f. from proposal to maintain what currently exists on lot). Keep structural coverage at 2,150 (15%) and lakeshore setback of 42' for structure- both as proposed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with Planning Commission ’s recommendation with the exception of the 42' lake setback. Staff recommends a 50' minimum setback, as noted in the attached memo from Mike Gaffron (PLEASE READ; Exhibit A). COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Council ’s options include - 1. Adopt the attached resolution (which reflects the Planning Commission recommendation with 42' setback). 2, Direct staff to amend the attached resolution to required a 50' setback. 3. Other. ^ ¥ 1 ' t t' ■*■ I.. * To: From: Date: Subject: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planncr Mayor and City Council Mike Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator, June ’, 2000 #2581 - 1687 Concordia Street - Staff Recommendation re: Lake Setback Staff recommended to Planning Commission that at least a 50' setback should be required for this residence, if not 75’. This is a teardown/rebuild, with the opportunity to meet all required setbacks. In the past the City has treated reconstruction very strictly, in most cases requiring that all setbacks be met when it is feasible to do so, while often granting substantial hardcover variances where substandard lots are involved. Planning Commission on May 15 recommended granting variances to allow the proposed 42* setback. I disagree with this conclusion for the reasons noted below, and suggest that a 50' minimum setback should be required for this and future adjacent applications. Justifications for requiring a 75' setback in this application include: it is physically possible to place the structure at the 75' setback without being limited by other setbacks. the City’s standard for structure setbacks to the lake is 75'; the clear intent of the ordinance based on the Comprehensive Plan is to provide an environmental buffer as well as a visual buffer between structures and the shoreline. Many Orono lakeshore homes do not meet this standard, not did they at the time it went into effect (early 1970's), but the majority of lakeshore homes which have been rebuilt since the early 1970's have been oquired to meet this standard when it was possible to do so. There are exceptions, but most exceptions have been justified either because there were unusual conditions or there were obvious hardships. In this request the applicant cites three specific justifications for not meeting the 75’ setback: 1.The lot is low and acts as a drainage basin for the neighboihood after major storms; if the house was moved back to the 75' line it would be partially within the area that floods. Staff does not dispute that this is a problem. Tlie adjacent homes are both nearer the lake than 75', and moving this one to 75' will cause new lake view impairments for the applicant that currently don ’t exist. Unfortunately, this train of think’ng works against the City’s long-term goals. If no homes were ever moved back to the 75' line because the neighboring homes were closer to the lake, then the City would never reach its goal of having most homes meeting the 75' standard. However, in the past the City has normally adnunistered its average setback ordinance to only protect the non-moving party; and that is how U2581 June 1,2000 Page 2 the ordinance has always been worded and interpreted: "No principal or accessory structure shall be located within 75' of the lakeshore nor closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing (emphasis added) residence buildings on adjacent lots..." There is nothing in the ordinance that gives a moving party the right to be closer than the 75' setback merely because the existing adjacent homes are non-conforming. 3. Privacy for the adjacent homes is compromised by setting the new house so that its lakeshore yard is within the side yard view of the adjacent homes. This is a legitimate concern; however, should this concern override the long-term goals of the City? Is loss of privacy a legitimate hardship? The adjacent neighboring property owner to the north, Tom Palm, was granted variances in 1994 to add a second story above his existing residence 39 ’ from the shoreline. When it was later found that the home would have tc be totally rebuilt, he was granted a variance to be 50' from the shoreline with the new home. 50' happened to be the DNR’s minimum setback Standard for General Development lakes, and happened to place his residence in line with homes on either side. The angle of the shoreline in this immediate neighborhood provides a striking example of the conflict between keeping the homes ‘in line’ and the City’s long term goals. Palm’s house at 1685 Concordia is 50' from the nearest point on the shoreline; Gehring’s proposed west facade will be directly in line with that of Palm, but will be 42' from the shore; and the adjacent house to the south at 1695 Concordia, s also directly in line but is only 36' from the shore, with a deck only 26' from the shore. The house at 1695 is an old (ca. 1910) small cabin on a lot assessed at 3 times the structure value; this one will surely be in for a teardown/rebuild in the relatively near future. And it gets even worse; the next let down the line, at 1705, has an old cabin valued at less than 1/lOth the land value, located just 30' from the shoreline. It would be extremely counterproductive to let 1695 or 1705 be rebuilt 36' or 30' from the shore just because they would stay ‘in line’ with the others. Ifeach house in this line is set square with the side lot lines at a 50' setback, they will each be offset 6-8' from each other, which should not cause anv privacy concerns. Recommendation / would strongly urge that Council not accept the 42' setback but hold the standard to at least SO' for the Gehring request, as well as for future requests in this immediate neighborhood. I do believe that the low topography is a legitimate hardship supporting a variance from the 75' standard for Gehring’s situation; this topographic constraint affects a few other adjacent lots and is unlikely to be easily or inexpensively solved. Slightly raising the grade at the homesites and leaving the remainder of yard area as a drainage basin is probably the least expensive solution. Attachment: Neighborhood Topography I "= 100' \ ' *!i M A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16(L)(1) FILE NO. 2581 WHEREAS, John N. Gehring and Kristin R. Gehring, husband and wife, (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1687 Concordia Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: The North 50 feet of the South 100 feet of Lot 16, Coffee’s Addition to Shadywood Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to allow the principal residence to be located 42* from the shoreline where a 75' setback is required; Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(L)(1) to allow 1,012 s.f. (26.7%) of hardcover in the 0-75' setback area where 0 s.f. (0%) is allowed and 999 s.f. (26.3%) exists to permit the construction of a new residence on the lot; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 15,2000, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application w'ere given the opportunity to speak thereon. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2581. This property is located in the LR-IC Zoning District, where .5 acre or 21,780 s.f. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of approximately .33 acres or 14,313 s.f. Page I of 6 t im*JI r •'r rr ■ I . F" m V I 3. r •f" V The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 15, 2000 and recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A.Lots in the Concordia neighborhood were developed prior to zoning standards for residential development of lakeshore properties. The subject property and two other lots on Concordia are the only 50' wide lots in the neighborhood. B The proposed new residence will meet the required side setback of 10’ on a lot that is 50' in width. C.More than one-half of the existing residence structure is located within the 0- 75' lakeshore protected area. D. The proposed improvement will result in an increase in hardcover within the 0-75' setback area, but the overall hardcover on the lot remains as it exists at 3,384 s.f. E.The structural coverage will increase from 1,918 s.f. (13.4%) to 2,150 s.f. (15%). F.The proposed new residence will be located 42' from the lakeshore, but behind the average lakeshore setback. G.The neighboring property owners were present at the meeting and expressed their support for the proposal. H.The improvement would be consistent with improvements on adjacent properties. I.The improvement would not have a detrimental impact on the values of the surrounding residences. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on tliis property are peculiar to Page 2 of 6 j r r li: ■ V I- it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial •'roperty right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to allow the principal residence to be located 42' from the shoreline where a 75' setback is required; Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(L)(1) to allow 1,012 s.f. (26.7%) of hardcover in the 0-75' setback area where 0 s.f. (0%) is allowed and 999 s.f. (26.3%) exists to permit the construction of a new residence on the lot. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Hardcover improvements shall be limited to the improvements as shown on the site plan included as Exhibit A of this resolution. Hardcover in the 0-75' setback area is approved at 1,012 s.f. or 26.7%, in the 75-250' setback area at 2,170 s.f. or 24.5% and 250-500' setback area at 202 s.f or 12.1 %. Any further hardcover to the property will not be looked at favorably. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2.All hardcover improvements scheduled for removal shall be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. Applicants ’ contractor shall obtain the required demolition permits for the removal of the principal structure. Page 3 of 6 \r ■ fr 3.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 12,2001). 4.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5.The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of June, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of June, 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 1 ■ i > * •■ >. V •• ' ■. i'’. I 't •i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of,., 2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be Ae person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public i i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this__________day of____., 2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 trim ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. .5.1(10S. Ilwy. Nu. 101 MiiMKlwiikn, MN 5.5J 13 riitmc (612) 'IM I'HA l iu (6l2) ’IM K267 wmm^JOHN GEinUNG fiUEmfifik AioU.2000 PRAFTliD: April 10.2000 !j tj iT-.-.- r 7 If A V'V kytf *%v . V •- - . • •• •-. umL til U /i' f •* i.'i* - V C ••i» ^•• .t'.* * HMNorthM AsdorHieSoulh 100 feel ofLol 16,CulTce'* AiklUioiiloSliMlTwooULako Miimdonlu, IkMc^ GouRly, MimewHa. LIMITATIONS A NOTig! L SlMiwingtiwienslkiMfinncliMvrbouMliiy line*ofIheabove legaldetcriplion. Tbetcoper' mmttnkn&ongsi IwlMdadeicniiiningwiMl you own, whidibalcgil mailer. Pleaso check Uw kgal Seacriplieii wiili ywr itcotda or comoll wMli compclenl legal counsel, if necessaiy, to make sure tail M b conocl, ami dial aiqr HMlIcn of reconI, such as eaxmcnls, IImI you wish shown 00 llio survey, kivf been ihowBa 1 Slwwing Ike location of exktinf ImpfOYctncnU we deemed ImpofUnt 3. Setting MW MonMMnli or mHyins okl wonnnicnU lo mark Ibe comcn oflbo property. 4. Slwwbitcfenllnniontfwiiteilfetcclcillocatlonilogivniofiieimlkalloaorilklopography of iMiilnTlwckvilionitlKmnnlnlicmlyloChebciichcnitk provkkd on (hii funrey. Uie that timeimMnk and d^tk itt knit one oOicf fenluw ilwmn on Ihc mnp when lidcnninlng cHher clcvatioris fcrwonnMiiile. 5. Mnottieni of Ibo eibllng gnrage ere tbowii u mcasuicU lo Uie titling, the nclutl dimensions of ^ iMgfltngtloiwftimingwii^beku. ^ 4. .Siipwim Ibe loeilion of ■ propoted new dwclJing and yard gnnling for your review and for Ihe 5 fivitw of andi gomnmcnlal agaicict as may have Jurisdiction. GIlAPinC SCALE 10P OF rOUNOATKM • SSX7 loir noon - S34.7 PFAK OF nOOF - 9SSl2 GRAOC AROUND HOUSC • SSX2 (at rttr) 1 iMii • tf a yrAHDARD yMDOLS A CX)NVCNTIONS; ” • * Denolca 1/2* ID bIims willi niaitic niuii bcaiDsnoiai 1^ IDpipe wllli plastic plug bearing Slate Llceuso Number 9235, set, uiitcss ulhcnvisc CidtiSia iWCATlOW: i ImcI^ cofUy UmI dda sunrey was prepared by me or undef my dkccljcupcrvision and dial I am a [mionai Surveyor under tfie Laws of tie Slate of Minnmta. rl2l./V>\Aa I. PartoP.B:jL PitrM~9235 "p a 11 (5- ‘i ~ % m0 fNrrn m0 wf awn t$ JktJrm JMXsM9f9aBJr«8 r ; ...................—- ................................................ —24a04 — N 5904*20* C ^ m« 5wn aa««/ iw sa m •/ n« Jwn lanw WIN i§ 5 '■ V saw - anosadXnK 1 M M IL ••• i -----------!/ 6a tQ r*' \ I •JI.M 6 AUJaii bbthe Dcnchmarfctm aui I J Job No. 000297 r r /,r- I if • f C CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 ZONING FILE #2581 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: May 16, 2000 TO:John and Kristin Gehring 1687 Concordia Street Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: May 15,2000 VOTE: 5 FOR AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted, except the hardcover calculations be kept at 3,384 s.f. (existing on lot, removing 151 s.f.) and structural coverage be 2,150 s.f. (15%) and lakeshore setback for structure is 42'. Applicant*s next meeting b dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the June 12,2000 City Council meeting b May 31,2000. You will be notified by mail of the meeting date and time. If you desire certified copies of the officid Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. D 9'! «' .rr.r May 22,2000 To: Wendy Bottenberg From: John & Kristin Gehring 1687 Concordia St. Re: PLANNING COMMISSION REVISIONS As directed by the Orono Planning Commission, we have revised our application to reduce total hardcover to 3384 square feet. We accomplished this by reducing the sidewalk by 6i]Lsquare feet and the doe kennel bv 91 square feet, for a total reduction of 151 square feet!^^ cA ^ I fiC • prcftsed vcc-lK - 34^ A J This eliminates the request for a hardcover variance in the 75-250 zone. As a result, and as directed by die Planning Commissior the hardcover calculations are kept at 3,384 s.f (existing), structural coverage remains at 2,150 s.f (15%), and lakeshore setback for structure is 42 ’. Here are the revised calculations by zone: Total Area Existing Allowed Proposed Variance Requested 0-75 3792 999 26.3 % 0 0% 1012 26.7 % Construction in 0-75 ft zone 75-250 8847 2183 24.7 % 2212 25% 2170 24.5 % None 250-500 1674 202 12.1 % 502 30% 202 12.1 % None Proposed: Total Structural Hardcover: Existing House 1168 Garage 750 Total 1918 -i- 14.313 13.4% Please call me at 471-0903 v»ith any questions. Thank you House 1400 Garage 750 Total 2150 ^ 14.313 15.0% b ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300S.IIwy.No. 101 Minne'onka. MN SS34S Phone (612)474 79M Fax (612)474 8267 8URVEYFOR: JOHN GEHRING ,r (t / !• \ V \ 4vi'i* V ■ f' --r SURVHYBD: April, 2000 DRAFTED: April 10,2000 f: i h LBQAL DBSCRimON: He Noitii 50 feel of ike South 100 feet ofLol 16, G>free'i Addition to Shedywood Like Minneionki» Hempin County• Mlnoeioli. LIMITATIONS fe NOTES: 1. SboWunthe fenglhanddlfecUon of boyndiry lines of ita above legal description. Hie scope of our estvtoee does nol Include determining whet you own, which is a legal mailer. Please check the bgel dsecflplioii with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure Ihnt it is ooiiroct, and thid any matters of record, such u easements, that you wish shown on the survey. 2. Showhii Ike locatiooofexisting improvements we deemed important 3. Selling new mnni—nts or veriftring old monuments to mark the corners of the property. 4. Showing eievmiooe on the site el selected locations to give some indlcadonoftltotopo^phy of fee site. The devabone shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Uiethat banckmaik and check at least one other feature shown on the map when determining other elevations for use on this site. 5. Dhnsaalons of the eaistlag garage are shown as measured to the siding, the actual diineiuions of the gsragB to the ftaming woiild be less. 6. Shosring the locetioo of a proposed new dwelling and yard grading for your review and for the review of Mch governmental agencies as may have Jurisdiction. GRAPHIC SCALE TOO or rOUNDADON • %5X7UM mxm • S34.7rcAK or ao^ • ssas CRAOC Air ^ House - aasia STANDARD SYMBOLS fe (X)NVENTIONS: "a * Denotes 1/2* ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State Licenso Number 9235,8c^ unless otherwise •L^IUjLU I kcnlqr octtiiy Ihtt drii Hnrey WM prcfwfcd by me or iffider my diioct ItaAMiaMl EnglMer omI • PrsifeMiaiial Surveyor under Ifae Laws of li PMfciv P.B. ft P^. NoT^S ^e\ T I , a,., 6 .1 a J Job No. 000297 r' ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 15,2000 the proposed garage. A variance to the street side yard setback is required to perniit a side yard setback of 23 feet wpere 50 feet is required. The proposed garage wili be iocated 23 feel from Spates Avenue, vyhfOT is not a heaviiy traveied street. Bottenberg stated the existing garage wiii be remodeled into a master bedfe^m/bath, laundry room and a quarter bath. The property is serviced with a well, which is on the east side of the residence. The garage will result in an increase of structura^dwerage on the lot to 9.76 percent where 6.94 exists and 15 percent Is allowed, which below what is allowed. The garage will also result in an increase of overall hardcover^edverage to 29.9 percent where 23.7 percent exists and 35 percent is allowed, which is atsg41^ow what is allowed. City Staff is recommending appjpdal of the street side yard setback. Paltrin indicated he has np^mments regarding his application. There were no pu^Mdcomments relating to this application. Lindquistipdved, Nygard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2580, 136^.JVailroad Avenue, granting of a variance to street side yard setback for property focated at 1360 Railroad Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#7) #2581 JOHN AND KRISTIN GEHRING, 1687 CONCORDIA STREET - VARIANCES, 7:55 p.m. - 8:40 p.m. (Berg is not present In Council Chambers) John and Kristin Gehring, Applicants, were present. Neil Trainor, Neighbor, was present. 'Tb^'v\ Prxlm, tOTt-S Bottenberg stated the Applicants are requesting variances to tear down an existing residence and build a new residence in approximately the same location on the lot. The proposal involves moving the new residence back a few feet to be more in alignment with the adjacent properties and bring the residence more Into compliance with side yard setbacks and structural lot coverage. Page 15 L_„ t- i .m ORONO PLANNING CO\LMISSION Monday, May 15,2000 Bottenberg staled the Applicant has Indicated a desire to work with City Staff on this matter and has submitted a number of plans in order to bring the proposal more in compliance with City Code. A variance to lakeshore setback is required to permit the principal structure to be located 42 feet from the lakeshore where 75 feet is required. A second variance to hardcover in the 0-75 feet setback is also required to permit 26.7 percent hardcover where zero percent is allowed and where 26.3 percent exists. Another variance to hardcover in the 75-250 foot setback is also required to permit 26.2 percent of hardcover where 25 percent is allowed and 24.7 percent exists. The new residence wilt also result in an increase in structural coverage to 15 percent where 13.4 percent exists and 15 percent is allowed. Staff has indicated to the Appiicant that an average lakeshore setback variance is not required; however the location of the proposed resioence does not meet DNR minimum recommended standards for General Development Lakev of 50 feel. Gehring stated there are five other properties with approximately the same setback from the lake, and that their request is basically to make their residence stay at the same basic setback. Gehring Indicated he has spoken with his neighbors regarding this project, who have not expressed any concerns. Smith noted a letter has not been received from the DNR regarding this application. Smith inquired whether the DNR has been informed of this application. Bottenberg stated the DNR has been informed of this project and has not expressed any concerns. Gehring stated at the time they constructed their garage in 1995, they did work with City Staff and attempted to put together a comprehensive plan on this property. Gehring commented they were told that their plans for what they were proposing in the future were somewhat irrelevant because they were not In a position to approve everything at that time. Gehring noted they have taken steps In the past to keep hardcover to a minimum, such as reducing the width of the driveway and a smaller width sidewalk, both of which are below standards. Smith Inquired at what setback the Applicant is proposing to build his residence. Page 16 li*' i I ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 15, 2000 Gehnng stated they are proposing to build 42 feet from the lake, which is the average of the two adjoining properties. Gehring stated the property to the south has a ten foot deck plus three foot stairs at the rear of the residence, which reduces the setback to the lake. Tom Palm, 1685 Concordia Street, stated the comer of the house as it exists now is located 1.6 feet from the property line, noting he would be very much In favor of squaring up the house and widening the access to the lake. Palm commented his property was constructed 39 feet from the lake, with a ten foot deck. Palm stated by allowing the Applicant to construct at 42 feet from the lake. It would bring the residence into alignment with the other adjoining properties and improve the drainage in the area. Palm indicated he is in support of this project. Neil Trainor. 1675 Concordia Street, indicated he recently purchased this property from his parents who lived in the residence for quite some time. Trainor stated a majority of the problem with the setback has resulted from the lakeshore eroding over the years, noting that approximately ten feet of lakeshore has eroded away over the years. Trainor stated the location for the proposed residence is good due to the alignment with the other adjoining properties. Smith inquired why the Planning Commission did not require Palm to meet the 50 foot setback at the time he constructed his residence In 1995, Palm stated no one was in favor of a two story building, which would block the neighbors ’ view at the 75 foot setback, so the Planning Commission elected to allow the house to be built at 39 feet to make it more in alignment with the other homes in the area. Stoddard commented he has concerns with the amount of hardcover proposed In the 0-75 foot setback as well as the amount of hardcover In the 75-250 foot setback. Stoddard stated the Applicant may need to look at reducing the amount of hardcover. Gehring inquired whether he was being asked to relocate his garage to reduce hardcover. Smith stated the Planning Commission on new construction generally requires the Applicants to comply with the structural and hardcover requirements. Smith stated the Applicant should attempt to lower the hardcover in the 75-250 foot setback to 25 percent, which is what is typically allowed Page 17 it ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 15,2000 on new constmction. Stoddard stated the Planning Commission should consider whether the hardcover should exceed what is existing in the 0-75 foot setback. Lindquist stated his preference would be to locate as little hardcover as possible in the 0-75 foot setback, but in this case due to the location of the other residences in the neighborhood, it would not be logical to move the house further back from the lake. Lindquist noted the cabins in this area have existed for approximately 100 years. Gehring commented that these lots are all 50 foot lots, which means you are limited in what you can do with the lot. Nygard indicated what creates a hardship is the topography of the land. Stoddard stated he would like to see the residence constructed closer to the lake than the required 75 foot setback due to the location of the other residences in the neighborhood. Stoddard indicated he would like to see the hardcover in the 0-250 foot setback reduced. Stoddard noted this is new construction, and suggested the Applicant consider his options. Gehring commented they have attempted to limit the size of the house while still being able to have four bedrooms. Gehring stated in his view the narrow lot v^dth creates a hardship as well as the high water table, which does not allow for construction of a basement. Stoddard stated the Applicant would be allowed 2,200 square feet of living space under the structural coverage limits. Nygard inquired whether the sidewalk from the garage Is necessary. Gehring stated the garage is located 100 yards from the residence. (Berg returns at 8:15 p.m.) Lindquist stated the Applicant is allowed 15 percent structural coverage. Stoddard stated he does not have a problem with the proposed structural coverage but would like to see the amount of proposed hardcover reduced in the 0-250 foot setback. Stoddard commented the intent of the hardcover limits is to help protect the shoreland. Stoddard stated the Applicant is Page 18 i j ■■ r ■ .'i* ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 15,2000 allowed 2,212 square feet of hardcover in the first two zones. Nygard commented that people also tend to add additional structure in the future, which the Applicant should also consider. Lindquist stated in his view the Applicant should not exceed what is existing now on hardcover and structural coverage. Gehnng stated the residence originally was a cabin and was not constructed as a year-round residence. Gehnng stated the residence does not adequately serve a family a four. Gehring stated at the time they built the garage, they were not given much direction from City Staff at that time. Mrs. Gehring stated their current house is 30 feet wide along the lakeshore and 44.7 feet deep. The proposal is to build the new residence at 30 feet wide and 45 feet deep, which in essence squares the house and centers it on the lot. Lindquist commented he does not want to see any increase in hardcover or structural coverage over what currently exists, with the residence being lined up with the other residences In the neighborhood. Gehring stated they are requesting an increase of 13 square feet in the 0-75 foot setback and 138 square feet in the 75-250 foot setback, which basically is the size of a small bedroom. Smith indicated that the Planning Commission does require other Applicants to reduce the amount of hardcover and structural coverage proposed. Gehring stated they are basically requesting the same amount of hardcover as what exists on the Palm property, Palm noted the Applicants did make attempts to reduce the amount of driveway and sidewalk at the time the garage was constructed. Nygard stated the Applicant will need to address the hardcover and structural coverage issues. Smith commented the Planning Commission appears to be comfortable with the 42 foot lakeshore setback, with hardcover being limited to what currently exists. Gehring noted they have reduced the amount of hardcover that exists on the property from what it Page 19 Lp 1 5 r;.fi m L,t». 1^;- \ r . ;i' •% X Jf;-* ;'^' f/ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May IS, 2000 was when they first purchased the property. Smith staled the Planning Commission can either act on the application tonight or table It to allow the Applicant time to revise his plans. Smith commented it appears the application will be denied as proposed. Gehring requested the Planning Commission act on his application tonight. Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend denial of Application #2581, John and Kristin Gehring, 1687 Concordia Street, based on the plans presented, with the understanding that the application would be approved if the amount of hardcover proposed is reduced from 3,535 square feet to 3,484 square feet. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0, Berg Abstained. Stoddard recommended the Applicant continue to work with City Staff on this application. Stoddard stated based on the ordinance and the precedent that would be set, the Applicant needs to comply with the hardcover and structural coverage limits. Smith noted the Planning Commission has acted on vrhat is before them tonight. Weinberger commented the City Council may elect to send It back to the Planning Commission if the Applicant submits revised plans. Gehring commented his understanding was that his application would be approved if the hardcover is reduced. Lindquist stated his motion is recommending approval contingent upon the Applicant reducing the amount of structural coverage and hardcover to what is presently existing on the property. Stoddard inquired whether the Planning Commission should reconsider the motion. Nygard moved, Stoddard seconded, to reopen the discussion. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0, Berg Abstained. Gehring requested to amend his application to reflect the amount of hardcover cumently existing Smith stated In the past the Planning Commission has recommended approval of applications where there is only a slight reduction in hardcover or structural coverage required with the Page 20 r-. ir h i:'| ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 15, 2000 understanding the Applicant will work with City Staff to revise his plans to bring it into conformance with the Planning Commission's directives. Smith indicated she would like to poll the Planning Commission members to see whether that would be appropriate in this case. The majority of the Planning Commission indicated they would be agreeable to making approval contingent upon a reduction In the amount of hardcover and structural coverage proposed to what currently exists on the property. Stoddard Indicated he would not be In favor of making approval contingent and would prefer to see the Applicant continue to work with City Staff prior to approval. Lindquist indicated he would be willing to make a motion to allow 3.484 square feet In hardcover and 2,150 square feet In structural coverage, which is what exists now. Nygard requested the Applicant limit the amount of structural coverage on this lot to 2,150 square feel regardless of the location of the new residence. Gaffron commented the Applicant Is looking at reducing approximately 51 square feel of hardcover. Bottenberg stated an error was made In the calculation of hardcover and the amount existing is 3,384 square feel rather than 3,484 square feel. Lindquist noted the amount of hardcover to be reduced would be 151 square feet rather than 51 square feet. Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2581, John and Kristin Gehring, 1687 Concordia Street, with the understanding that the new hardcover will not exceed the existing 3,384 square feet and that the structural coverage will not exceed 2,150 square feet, and to grant a variance to the lakeshore setback to permit the principal structure to be located 42 feet from the lakeshore. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Nygard moved, Stoddard seconded, to rescind the motion recommending denial of Page 21 r:. :■ ' ► ' r -3 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 15,2000 this application. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Weinberger noted that typically the Planning Commission has required any hardcover in the 0-75 fool setback be applied to the other setbacks. Weinberger inquired whether the approval would be subject to the condition that there would be no further hardcover allowed on this property. Weinberger noted the Applicants are not at the 35 percent maximum amount in the 250-500 foot setback. Smith indicated that a restnction on further hardcover would be a condition of approval. Nygard stated the Applicant will not be allowed any additional hardcover on his property. (#8) #2582 FRANCIS AND SUSAN ANN KOUBSKY, 4784 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES, iO p.m. - 8:48 p.m. Franci^'-qnd Susan Koubsky, Applicants, were present. Bottenberg sls^ the Applicants are proposing to remove the existing access at North Shore Drive and construct a gar^ge/room addition and deck at the northeast comer of the existing residence. The deck will replace an ^xj^ing one that will be removed. Access to the property will now be via Park Avenue (addressed as Tohl^view Lane) along the north lot line due to the steep topography at North Shore Drive which makes acce^b^ring the winter months a hazard for both the Applicants and the motorists who drive on North Shore City Staff is recommending the Applicants change^hqir address to Tonkaview Lane with the relocation of the access to the property. Bottenberg noted the garage/room addition meets all required setbacks except for the street setback at the north lot line, which will require a variance to permit a frbql setback of ten feet where 35 feet is required. Bottenberg noted the structural coverage and hardcover on the lot is increasing bubiq^still below the atlowabie limits. City Staff is recommending approval of the variance for front yard setback and the relocation ol Page 22 #D rr.vi. lit '< ! , f K' 1 TO:Chair Havm and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:May 15,2000 SUBJECT: #2581 John and Kristin Gehring 1687 Concordia Street Variance — Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1C One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 acre) Lot Area:14,313 s.f. (.33 acre) Lbt of Exhibits A B C D E F G H I J K Analysis Worksheet Application Site Plan/ Survey Floor Plan/Elevations Topographic Map Hardcover Calculations Plat Map Location Map Photo of Property Property Owner’s List Permit Record Pertinent Code Sections 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 : Lakeshore Setback: The shoreline setback for lakeshore lots shall be 75 feet. Variance Request: To permit the principal structure to be located 42' from the lakeshore where 75' is required. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 ( L)(l): Hardcover in the 0-75* Setback Area: Within 75 feet of shoreline there shall be no excavating, filling, hardcover, temporary or permanent structures. Variance Request: To permit 1,012 s.f (26.7%) of hardcover where 0 s.f (0%) is allowed and 999 s.f (26.3%) exists. 3. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2): Hardcover in the 75-250' Setback Area: Within 75-250' of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. Variance Request: To permit 2,321 s.f (26.2%) of hardcover where 2,212 s.f (25%) is allowed and 2,183 s.f (24.7%) exists. #2581 John/Kristin Gehring 1687 Concordia Street Variance 5/15/2000 Page I 1: i V Application Summary: The applicants are requesting variances to tear down an existing residence and build a new residence in approximately the same location on the lot. The proposal involves moving the new residence back a few feet to be more in alignment with adjacent properties, conformance to side yard setbacks and structural lot coverage. • The new residence will result in an increase in hardcover coverage in the 0-75’ setback area to 1,012 s.f. (26.7%), where 999 s.f. (26.3%) exists and 0 s.f. (0%) is allowed. • The new residence will result in an increase in hardcover coverage in the 75-250' setback area to 2,321 s.f. (26.2%), where 2,183 s.f. (24.7%) exists and 2,212 s.f. (25%) is allowed. • The new residence will result in an increase in structural coverage to 2,150 s.f. (15%) where 1,918 s.f. (13.4%) exists and 2,150 s.f. (15%) is allowed. StaffyApplicant Discussions; Plan #l : The first plan was submitted on April 17,2000. From the onset, the applicant wished to conform with zoning codes as best as possible. The first set of plans had several issues dealing with lot coverage, hardcover coverage and lakeshore setback. The applicant decided to take the plans and redesign them. Plan #2: In May of 2000, the applicant came forward with a second set of house plans. This set of house plans is the latest. The redesign eliminated the lot coverage variance meeting the current zoning standard of 15%. However, lakeshore setback and hardcover coverage variances in the 0-75' and 75-250' setback areas are still required. Staff has discussed with the applicant that an average lakeshore setback variance is not required, however location of the proposed residence does not meet DNR minimum recommended standard for General Development lakes of 50'. Orono zoning ordinance requires residences to be 75' from the lakeshore. However, because this lot and the two adjacent properties are the only three lots on Concordia which are 50' wide, in 1995 the adjacent property to the north was granted variances to construct a new residence 50' from the shoreline so that new residence would not be inconsistent with its adjacent residences. The three residences are in alignment with each other. In 1995 the applicants constructed a detached garage on the property meeting all required setbacks. Statement of Hardship ; The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. #2581 John/Kristin Gehring 1687 Concordia Street Variances 5/15/2000 Page 2 Ik-’i i ?:• S't. .kV Ii»" i'-T f J." Issues for Consideration ; 1. The proposed residence will meet the required side setback of 10' on a lot that is 50' in width. 2. The improvement would be consistent with recent improvements on adjacent properties. 3. The lakeshore view windows of the adjacent residences will not be negatively impacted by the proposed new construction. 4. Lots in the Concordia neighborhood were developed prior to zoning standards for residential development of lakeshore properties. The subject property and two other lots on Concordia are the only 50' wide lots in the neighborhood. 5. Staff sent the current proposal to Ceil Strauss of the DNR for comments. At this time the City has not received any comments regarding this application. The structure does not meet the DNR-recommended 50’ minimum setback for General Development lakes. However, if the structure is moved back 8' to meet the 50' standard, it will no longer be in alignment with adjacent properties. 6. The structural coverage on the lot is increasing but still meets the allowed 15%. 7. The 0-75' hardcover coverage is increasing slightly and is above the allowed 0%. 8. The 75-250* hardcover coverage is increasing slightly and is above the allowed 25%. 9. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Discussion The City has not taken full advantage of past opportunities on Concordia Street to move residences back to the 75' line as they were rebuilt. As a result, neighbors now have an expectation that the “standard” is to be in line with the neighbors. The Planning Commission may wish to discuss their future expectation for this neighborhood, given that there are still a few older cabins which could undergo removal/reconstruction. It is staff s opinion that if a setback variance is granted, the house should at least meet a 50' setback; Planning Commission must decided whether the stated hardships support something less than the full 75' setback. Options of Action To either deny or approve the current proposal as presented; OR To table application providing applicant additional time to address any concerns raised by Planning Commission members. U258! John/Kristm Gehring 1687 Concordia Street Variance 5/15/2000 Page 5 ;r i-’’' ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area; LR-IA Lot Area Required 21,780 s.f.(.5acre) Actual 14,313 s.f. (.33 acre) Structural Coverage ; Hardcover Calculations: Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 14,313 s.f.Allowed: 2,150 s.f (15%) Existing: 1,918 s.f (13.4%) Proposed: 2,150 s.f (15%) : r Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing hardcover Proposed hardcover 0-75’3,792 s.f 0 s.f 999 s.f 1,012 s.f (0%)(26.3%)(26.7%) 75-250'8,847 s.f 2,212 s.f 2,183 s.f 2,321 s.f (25%)(24.7%)(26.2%) ^r 250-500’1,674 s.f 502 s.f (30%)202 s.f (12.1%)202 s.f (12.1%) .4 0-SOC.' * • Application U ^ ^ . Date Received */ // 7/&c Amount Paid 3 C C CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address /LV1 /¥•._________________ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) m A •• • • ^ •«tl/ 1 iVjpwiijr Jivftviiuxivaiiv/ii >x»x^#/ f» ^ Attach legal description to application if not included required surve^j^ Date Proper^ Acquired ^<15______________________________________^(month/year) I (do) (^6 i^) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property; residentid Zoning District: I C other (specify). APPLICANT Name Address: Hj^ Phone (home ) O^ics____ ____ Phone (woric ) (j/>- _____ City: ________Zip:>»^ 56'T// OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ___ Phone (home) Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost % iSO, Describe request in detail: ^ CtHu.ktJl _____________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width >/ Hardcover \/ Lot Coverage 6 CH:>) Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: ^ ___ jf ^ ^^f**^attathh-additionahsl^eeis^^necessary)-^ 1 t'. 6 f.' m-r * Variance Application 1687 Concordia St. 4/16/00 Description of Request: We are proposing to remove the existing 1 '/i story cabin, and the entire sidewalk on the lake side, and build a new home in the same general area. The new home will bring the property in compliance with side setback requirements. The current cabin is just 18 inches from the property line at the structure’s northeast comer, and 36 inches from the property line at the northwest comer. We desire to build at a line denoting the average lakeshore setback of the structures on either side, for the reasons outlined in #1 and #3 below. Description of Hardship: Our variance requests are based on the following hardships: 1. If we were to build the new house starting at 75 feet from the OH W mark, the structure would be partially located in a swale which holds water mnoff from the road and adjacent properties during heavy rains and in spring. Our property is at the bottom of a hill, and plays a major role in collecting and filtering water runoff from the neighborhood before the water enters the lake. We inquired about the city’s willingness to address the issue of water management in the neighborhood in 1995 and in subsequent years (see attached photos from 1997), but no action was taken. 2. Due to the resulting high water table, we are unable to build a basement in this home. Also, since the maximum elevation is 30 feet above grade, we are limited to the square footage we are able to build two stories. Given these limitations, we designed a 4 bedroom house, all rooms of relatively modest size. If we reduced the size of the house frirther, the resulting room sizes would be reduced to the point of being smaller than the current standard in new constmetion (especially bedrooms), and would possibly impact their functionality. 3. Building at the 75-foot line would violate the spirit of the Average Lakeshore Setback requirement, which states that a house may not be built in front of adjacent property owners. Locating our stmeture at 75 feet would mean that both neighboring structures would be located forward of the front of our house. In the case of the house to the North (the Palm home), 2/3 of that house would be located in front of our house if we built at the 75-foot line. Looking at the side yards, there will be 20 feet on the North side between our house and the Palm home, and 30 feet on the South side between our house and the Belawski home. This creates privacy issues for the neighbors, a “tunnel” location for our home and undesirable sight lines for us. '•.X ‘a I ^ '■ 77--o ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO, S300S.Hwy.No.10l Minnetoalui. MN SS34S Phmie (612) 474 7964 Fax (612) 474 8267 guRVBYFOR. JOHN GEHRING DRAFTED: April 10,2000 'r tj 7 •' A . ■' » ; t iXy.» M V *. . LBQALDBSCRimC»l! H h Norik SO fcot of dw Sooth 100 feet of Lot 16, Coffbe*! Addhioa to Shadywood Lake Minnetonka, a ti ''• r • • •y 0 . h*J. UyrATIONS A lyras: l/ Showliif Iw traglli ofboupdify Ham of the abovg Icgil detcripUoiL The scope of o»wnrtewdoemo| iaclade rtnlrniiming whet you own, wfakfa It • Icgil metier. Please check the IspiisscfIptkMiwIdiyoyrrsconIs or ootisyh with competeot legal oouDsel, if Dcccetify, to make sure of record, such as easooaiti, that you wish shown on the survey, 2. Showing dw looatioo of eaisling improvemenu we deemed important S. Silling now monumeBli or verifying old moounieols to mark the comen of the property. 4. Showing elevadona on the slle at ejected locatlonalo give some indicatloooftte topography of iw sile. The ejevadorii shown rdate only to the benchmait provided on this survey. Use that hwKhmnrit and cheek at kaal one ocher feature shown on the map when determining other elevations to use on dds she. 5. DhnenaionsoCtoedating garage am shown at measured to the siding, the actual dimentloos of GRAPHIC SCALE 6. Showing the localionofapmpoaed new dwdUng and yard grading for your review and for the review of sucdi govarnnHutnl agoicto as nmy have JuihMliclkxL STANDARD SYMBOLS A CONVENTIONS; * •"Denotes 1/2” ID pipe with ptasticphig bearing Stale Lfoense Number 9235, set, unl» othwwise ion OF rauNoaiQN • esii? unr FLOon • ojav FtaKornoQF- asAs OUAK mourn HOUK - SSAS mm 6 I <! J Jod No. 000297 A IL. • I SECOND FLOOR FLAN l/4"=r0 I? b r4T >2 sroor I . I------A- -‘-l".- 1 i Si: : I f t ' t •Isroor _____I .. ^ 'll i o «MAnu>uiM> FWor ,.-l I .' FR a'* •t ■rrVibbT*r.r i (JVINOKOOM. I E| j I.i TiJ A ?. A KjrottN I I___I ; ' m * i V PANTmr [( «MNG ; j ' 1:4 «I !. •*4 t I A I ii I I 0«M« tvlwi MfOtV ctn.«t4% I DACKHAIL/MUPAREA -J \K \ \ 3/4DAH< ■/In I; ojoetr =ij >, . f-r I aosrr -"t \ UTILITY EITTKY ‘7/----I7I. ao&pr aOS€T * •* ■>✓ • ''••J i l__ — k ! 4k { ' ) \V-... < rii* uurviii* DEN/U*: fAiMtti r§ *v rT * PCJKOI OU RDC Arcnittfct^ 5903 fuu rf Cl t^M9G*«W v»* 3MM rAic^<«A/eoi« •murct diHnN(iM9«t»itc «f>7C0NC9Uls9f. OKJNOLMI INPEX tNUT# tliu 1 2 3 RUac riAN& tUVATlOie CtEYATlPNU __»r^_______ * I C3 ivm^ rm n*«MC • A<X« miCNK/« I 9 ^ •t»-9* isutm it iwn*«a ts FIRST FLOOR PLAN VA^^Y 0 •CMM vM* INWtmMM I au—fwu I MnVIMHH « M M»l ■ii( imi t m<tr«r t aui •■Ml M ISM U. «■ MflWH 4/l9#CJU mHP^m ••CCft 1 I’i ’ ■ faMiia v; I* id I- |P?^|P ^W”- mim-l RDC Arcnitact» A90» fMKKI U1 wm M f1 X f=SB nn 'Biai "*• :E1 4. * /sit * /«t '/siii /3 TiZij ^/T iW41'.a . i.. WEST ELEVATION 1/4"=1'0 ..VCjiA •J J ’. / . \ / I rm » • •*♦ ' '••__rt’T^%» */^*><* CK-T { ::^ci i>^> _______ • it .X \ I • II ...-, wmm^m EAST ELEVATION 1/4’’=1*0 rwuii-i ori«M}tLM>TKrc «97cONnaRnA#i. 0«r«LIM fMOKtVXW Mt bM2» 00*463 V>fU PAI«»MOa-06Ml INDEX iMni0 inii 1 flOUK flAMd 2 lWfMW& 2 6LEVAT10M& «MM« »•#» *4« • m MfeOMMCM /nrcinui^ •r T w v««iWJMIi» «>-------1»— # «« ■* 0O«MMMtt ” > tMOtg—W1— • liUVIlMWMMriW a •Ota* •■■■•» ■<■ a t a «*< ■r» ^•MiMiMa k«MU4i» l•m uaaa ma f* 4AMX) 1>, C'\hJ t; v' .. . V.../i^ i)i\ K j' •»!l1II«UUj‘ -t NORTH ELEVATION 1/4"=V0 SOUTH ELEVATION l/4"=r0 RDC Arcnitecte 3X9 IvMltT »1 fiiomcw Ml bbiM m*-4A»>1090 fAlAI^2eA«^ (ici«r«}fr3«CNLe lC»7rONCaB»A<T. (MPM(VMI INDEX tHtiis mu ruxx rtAN& cievAnoie EltVATTOMD I «u< IMt* WtlMWraMi 4AMXi 'MM tM K. 1 [«5-q 8 ^ s o, m 200W Jo ^ ^200 •"v ■•'§(68); ^B B N ^200 B 50.09 60-OS 50. OG 5.IVV IVcn 3=2! y-- r- ^ ^ •Nl 'J U»v»-«» •V O' so 50 so 50 c ‘•f1 K im ly Po,^^ ->g i caO)v_^a >^3^ i..^ 50 so 50 50 _5 1^ MINNIE AVE so 50 6o 50 (S 5o so ^~N 1>I Ul So 50 B § §«=3=^(B 5>. _l^ 8 N : r>. V »• i i S i i 8 8 8 3 '^3 so so so so so so so 133. 200 V A <ji 200 N V U B S ^w200 1• 1••a B ~j 200 n!a B iS 35 ^200 a a g 5 2?00 a a s 200 N 1 a a (80)1 1 1« 1 a a f .* IV 200 s a • »a •J 'if 200 i a I 2^: r may-09-2000 07:43 B2BXCHANGE. INC 612 903 9850 P.01/04 K May S, 2000 To: Wendy Bottenberg From: John & Kristin Gehring 1687 Concordia St Re: Revised Calculations Total Area Existing Allowed Proposed Variance Requested 0-75 3792 999 26.3 % 0 0% 1012 26.7 % Construction in 0-75 ft zone 75-250 8847 2183 24.7 % 2212 25% 2321 26.2 % Hardcover 250-500 1674 202 12.1 % 502 30% 202 12.1 % None Total Structural Hardcover Existing i House 1168 Oftfag<?.-7gO Total 1918 + 14,313 Proposed:House 1400 Garage 750 Total 2150 + 14.313 13.4%15.0% Notes: 1.In the 250-500 fool zone, no change in the 12.1 % hardcover is proposed. The existing hardcover is 40% of allowed hardcover. 2.The garage is actually 750 square feel. The surveyor noted on the survey that he measured to the siding when he calculated 766 square feet. 3.The proposed structural coverage for the house docs not include a roof over the steps on the west and south entries. On the East entry, 50 square feet is covered and therefore structural hardcover. 16 square feet is uncovered stairs, and therefore is not structural hardcover. 4. 5. Please correct the spelling of “Kristian” to read “Kristin” on the agenda. Also attached is the revised hardcover calculations for all 3 zones. tl'l' • , >, F' 0 MRY-09-21 07:44 B2BXCHANGE. IhJC HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SErtBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 612 903 9850 P.02/04 # —» m ^ w*. • • .F= SOiLlOOO'*aesl CTISTINC HARDCOVER IH MIffi A. House _____________ S.F. Unftb Wkldi X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Ome C. Drivewiy S.F. X X S.F. S.F. D. Sldewelk \))»od K X S.F. S.F. B. Pado/Deck X X S.F. S.F. F. Undiwpe UndetUin By PlMtic X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. O. Other 2>\S.F. total hardcover in zone total PRO™^ AREA IN ZONE ^ 3.,^^ X100 - anqzT S.F. SJ». % raoPOSED ^S.F. A. House LMfih WW* X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Ouase C. Driveway X X S.F. S.F. D. Sidewalk X X S.F. S.F. E. Palio/Deck X X IS S.F. S.F. F. Laodset^ Uodetlaia By FlasUc X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. O. Other M'SI S.F. total hardcover in zone total property area in zone • A io\i^ + B xlOO \Q\2. S.P. S.F. % A B A B —. :..A MAY-09-2 07:44 B2BXCHANGE. INC ‘ V'A ■ H- f . SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ ^S-250^) 612 903 9850 P.03/04 250-500’ 500-1000’ * EXISTING WARDCOWn IN Zf»JE A. House Ungth B. Oarage • * . •• C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric O. Other dMtmci X X X X X X X X X X X X PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _____________ Lenfth Ba Oarate C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Pailo/Deck F. Umd$c^)e Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X » X X X X X G. Ocher tenrgl Width TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A j/Ai + B ee>>i-n X100 - Width TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ^ « .1 ^ A ♦ B PPH’ /X100 - S.F. 7S0 /g.fe J^/S 71 ^ie>2, 4U neo nog 7^2- ) S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. . Cjt 1 <0 S.P. / S.F. A S.F. B % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ■2.2.0-\ S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B i- \I imi mV-09-2000 07:44 B2BXCHANGE. INC 612 903 9850 P.04/04 * y , ■ ^75-250 ’ /25-500V 500-1000 ’ hardcover calculation worksheet setback ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 ’ yYTgnNO H^]^pCQVER IN ZONE A. House Ltiigtb Wlddi X X X B. Ouxtgfi C. Drivcwiy X X 1 D. Sidewalk L' N ' 6. Patio/Deck ; ';4'F. Landse^ Uaderlain • i ■■ By Plastic !;■ '0. Other X X X X X X X total HARDCOVER IN ZONE 5PER1 ---------------- A 2^ TUiAJL fWUwv^wv TOTAL PROP^TY ARIA IN ZONE ^ \(^T4_ x 100 fgftPOSBD iffl^l^pgQVER IN ZONE A. House _____________WMdi X X X B. Oange C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Laodseape Uoderlaifi By Plastic X X X G. Other total hardcover in ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE iv^qli S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 20^.S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ■“S.F. S.F. £0> Tion4^ i.a.> S.F. S.F. % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. i>D> + B X 100 - S.F. S.F. % A B A B TOTl^lL P.04 I ! i ^ 9 mm.mm ye » j‘ ■i * !• - f l#l n mp fc4«’‘i -»■'*. ti*4» W"w^v*.»vr'^U ‘S'-:i-VtS3 W :. • •___^^JZX-i . ■ c “t 1^"4,. # ‘ ;^r V<-lm •*^^ _ £ilo*^^*' . ■.•«■ m\ im ISMifes VI\ % t4jh Wm- V '. - ■■',..V« 4fj,;.H| VXi. :'-\r m • ^ '* * “ * t • '^^ ^**• "** *. • 1 w ’ ,WH'V ? • . d .*■» V ; ?r'r-w S N '•^•‘ ►-*• v^y •* 7«r^’ i •»> ^ - ■llfeiL.S^'.V.4f< - • V '• ; kr V m-• ' . ' 't‘ ivt ' « k \ • ■ ^ • ;/ ‘-'i • *' -4lv<* ! *• > fc3r •'-- • •1*^ » •*,.••. « j :fSSii ! .'ll '■r . t . . . • c V ••♦> • /•- 1 •f »\^ ' ,‘*\d \ »* : • ». T? N V mm MTC HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIA35A0I PACE 20 MTCH SM ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/Anni SO 17-117-2S 22 0020 •172S CONCORDIA ST JANES T NYSTRON JANES T NYSTRON 1701 NADISON ST N E NPLS NN 5MIS 30 17-1X7-23 22 0021 01705 CONCORDIA ST JANET JACOOSON SACHS JANET SACHS 75A5 17TH AV SO RICHFIELD NN 55A23 SO 17-117-23 22 0022 01A05 CONCORDIA ST T L PALN 0 M A PALM THOMAS L PALN 1605 CONCORDIA ST NAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADDR OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR SO 17-117-23 22 0023 01695 CONCORDIA ST D J • D R DELAMSKI DONALD JOHN DELAMSKI S019 COLORADO AVE N CRYSTAL NN 55622 30 17-117-23 22 0026 01607 CONCORDIA ST J N CEHRINO/K REINKE CEHRINC JOHN t KRISTIN CEHRINO 1607 CONCORDIA ST MAYZATA NN 55391 30 17-117-23 22 0030 01760 CONCORDIA ST D J DELAMSKI ADC BELAMSKX DAVID J A DAYNA C DELAMSKI 1760 CONCORDIA ST IIAYZATA HN 55391 -mt OMNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR SO 17-117-2S 22 0051 01690 CONCORDIA ST ROOERT N ENFIELD ROOERT N ENFIELD 1690 CONCORDIA ST NN 55391 SO 17-117-23 22 0032 01600 CONCORDIA ST LSD SEBOK LINDA D SEBOK 1600 CONCORDIA ST NAYZATA MN 55391 SO 17-117-23 22 0060 01635 CONCORDIA ST HOWARD R ALTON lit HOWARD R ALTON III 1635 CONCORDIA ST ORONO MN 55391 r; •TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR SO 17-117-2S 22 0063 01675 CONCORDIA ST HELEN K TRAINOR NEIL J A BARBARA L TRAINpR 1675 CONCORDIA ST MAYZATA MN 55S91 TOTAL BATCH 500 00010 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OH THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE 'I r y flA / f; -i - //if V '7 }) If '^^*'.** A . • •• J ■ % yr* ’I'- !i * •I '■ M -’ f 1 it K PERMIT RECORD Permit Mo.Date Type of Permit 3^0£*7-V«y-7^ g-iv/)/'Jl '■^>5'JUaa^ >«i'r ■ ii rifetAii ■ L.. ( [ ■ ' r * * Iir!t J Application Date: 4/19/00 Completion Date: 4/19/00 Deadline: 8/17/00 ^O/n, JUf! Cllr,. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION VVO DATE: June 5,2000 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Zoning: #2585 Thomas and Kathleen McCaffrey Fred and Joyce Shemanek 4265 and 4355 Chippewa Lane Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement RR'IA, One Family Rural Residential, 5 Acre Minimum lot size Application: To rearrange a common lot line to transfer 1.80 acres from property located at 4355 Chippewa Lane to 4265 Chippewa Lane. List of Exhibits: A Resolution B Notice of Planning Commission Action C Planning Commission Minutes (May 15,2000) D Septic Review by Chris Pence, On-Site Systems Manager E Planning Report Application Summary: The applicants have proposed to transfer 1.8 acre portion of the lot located at 4355 Chippewa Lane to 4265 Chippewa Lane. The existing 4355 parcel is a legal conforming lot consisting of 6.92 acres and having a lot width of370'. The transfer of 1.8 acres will result in a 5.12 acre parcel meeting the minimum lot size for the zoning district. However the projjosed lot division would transfer approximately 125' of frontage to the adjacent parcel leaving only 245' of frontage where 300' is required. Please note the site plan attached as Exhibit A to the draft resolution. The second lot is approximately 1 acre is size and would increase in lot size to 2.80 acres. The lot would have 327' of frontage on Chippewa Lane. This application requires the following approvals: 1) Class 1 subdivision of a lot line rearrangement between two developed parcels, and 2) a variance to lot width as the property located at 4355 would be reduced in lot width to less than 300'. A'. • • « I -. . ^ Lot Summaries:Lot Area Existing Lot Area Proposed Lot Width Existing Lot Width Proposed 4265 Chippewa 1.00 Ac.2.80 Ac.200’325' 4355 Chippewa 6.92 Ac.5.12 Ac.370’245’ Total 7.92 Ac.7.92 Ac.570'570’ Area, Lot Width and Yard Requirements Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 5.00 acres 300 feet 100 feet 50 feet 100 feet Planning Commbsion Recommendation: By a vote of 5 to 0 the Planning Commission recommended approval subject to the property owners grant drainage and utility easements 10' in width along exterior property lines and 5' along interior property lines. Staff Recommendation: To adopt the attached resolution approving the lot line rearrangement as submitted. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To adopt or amend the attached resolution. lAii |‘|IM ■ I **»r •* **"" ‘.‘t. ; .r r L k A A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 4265 AND 4355 CHIPPEWA LANE; AND GRANTING OF A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 10.27, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE NO. 2585 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement by Thomas McCaffrey and Kathleen McCaffrey and Frederick Shemanek and Joyce Shemanek (hereinafter "the subdividers") of properties legally described as: That part of the South Half of the Northwest (Quarter of the Southeast Quarter which lies West of the east quarter thereof and East of the West 421.7 feet thereof and north of the railroad right-of- way, EXCEPT the North 217.00 feet of the East 530.00 feet of said South Half of the Northwest (^rter of the Southeast (garter, Section 31, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel B The North 217 feet of the West 200 feet of the East 530 feet of the South One-half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 31, Township 118, Range 23, according to the Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. to be rearranged by transferring a portion of Parcel A to Parcel B legally described as: Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, After due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 15,2000, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and Page 1 of 7 . A Jfl * v.ih i.M <t ^ ' . . I f i WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of the City for a subdivision to rearrange the property lines between 4265 and 4355 Chippewa Lane. WHEREAS, At their regular meeting held on June 12, 2000, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Thomas and Kathleen McCaffrey and Frederick and Joyce Shemanek, noting the following findings of fact: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The property is located within the RR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential District requiring a minimum of 5 acres lot area and 300' width. The existing lots are as follows: 4265 Chippewa Lane 4355 Chippewa Lane 1 acre/200 ’ 6.92 acres/370' The subdividers have proposed a lot line rearrangement creating two substandard lots, one still substandard in area, the other becoming substandard in width. 4265 Chippewa Lane 4355 Chippewa Lane 2.80 acres/325' 5.12 acres/245' The new property line would result in less than 300' of public road frontage for 4355 Chippewa Lane. A variance should be granted for lot width. While 4355 is a legal conforming lot for lot area and lot width prior to subdivision, 4265 is substandard in both width and area. The total combined area and width of both lots is less than 10 acres and less than 600' in width so it is not possible to have both lots meet all area and width standards. The proposed rearrangement is a compromise that allows most efficient use of the available land for maintaining the two existing lots in a manner in keeping with the goals of the 5 acre zoning district. The property line has been placed to permit two conforming septic sites on each resulting lot. The City’s On-Site Systems Manager has determined the existing septic systems are non-compliant. The total dwelling units on the properties will not increase as a result of the common property line being relocated. Page 2 of 7 * ■’ “ • ' y'dm-^ 6.The house located at 4265 Chippewa Lane encroaches into a required side yard setback. Rearranging the property line would result in the house being more than the 50 feet required for side setbacks in the RR-IA zoning district. No new substandard setbacks for existing buildings will result from this rearrangement. 7.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 15, 2000 and recommended by a vote of 5 to 0 to approve the land use application as presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Orono hereby approves the lot line rearrangement of the above referenced property by the subdividers as shown on the certificate of survey by Mark S. Gronberg, a licensed surveyor of Coffin & Gronberg, Inc., dated March 23, 2000, attached Exhibit "B", and grants a variance to Municipal Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit a resulting Parcel A to be 245 feet in width where a 370 foot width exists and 300 feet is required in the RR-IA zoning district. The approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.The new legal description for Parcel A, as shown on the survey sited above, shall read as follows: Exhibit "C 2.New drainage and utility easements 5 feet along interior property lines and j.O feet along exterior property lines shall be recorded with this resolution. 3. 4. A variance shjUr be granted for lot width for Parcel A. The aforesaid division shown on the Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with eitlier the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Titles Office on or before December 12, 2000 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. 5.The approval granted by this resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, a new application shall be required for the City of Orono review. Page 3 of 7 - -1 m / #■' * ■ ! , •••r LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) Title Opinions or title documents acceptable to City Attorney shall be approved prior to recording this resolution. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall consent to the subdivision. b) The subdivider must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) 3 original signed Certificate of Survey documents shall be submitted by the applicant. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota this 12th day of June, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of June, 2000, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. i NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT A PROPOSED PARCEL B (TO BE ADDED TO MCCAFFREY PARCEL) The East 10.00 feel of that part of the West three fourths of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31. Township 118 North. Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, which lies south of the North 368.00 feet thereof, and north of the Luce Line Trail right-of-way; ALSO The South 151.00 feel of the North 3o8.00 feel of the West 314.50 feet of the East 324.50 feet of the West three-fourths of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 31; ALSO The North 217.00 feet of that part of the East 324.5 feel of the West three-fourths of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31. Township 118 North. Range 23 West of the 5th Prindpti) Meridian which lies west of the East 530.00 feet of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter Page 5 of 7 exhibit b 370.10 CHIPPEWA LANE H 89*2B'40- E 200.01 u EXHIBIT C PROPOSED PARCEL A (REMAINING SHEMANEK PROPERTY) That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31. Township 118 North. Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian which lies West of the east quarter thereof and East of the West 421.7 feet thereof and north of the railroad right-of-way, EXCEPT the East 10.00 feet thereof; ALSO EXCEPT the North 368.00 feet of the West 314.50 feel of the East 324.50 feet thereof. s'# h- .•A'. ' . ?- ■ i Page 7 of 7 . i-V#- ■ >•*-* •■'•^ ■;•*- .t t. '■)ui r f-A £i B CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PHONE:(952)249-4600 FAX:(952)249-4616 ZONING FILE #2585 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE; May 17,2000 TO:Thomas and Kathleen McCaffrey 4265 Chippewa Lane Maple Plain, MN 55359 COPIES TO: Fred and Joyce Shemanek 4355 Chippewa Lane Maple Plain, MN 55359 TYPE OF APPLICATION:X_Variance Conditional Use Permit _Subdivision (Lot Line Rearrangement) Other DATE OF MEETING: May 15,2000 VOTE; 5 FOR Planning Commission recommends the following: 0 AGAINST ^_Approval as submitted ___Approval subject to conditions noted below ___Denial for reasons noted below ___Tabled for reasons noted below ___No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Applicant's next scheduled to appear before the City Council on Monday, June 12,2000. If you have any questions please contact the Zoning Department at (952) 249-4600. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. '.i' t ■ ■ ' fi- i;; ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May IS, 2000 SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS (#2) #2585 THOMAS AND KATHLEEN McCAFFREY, 4265/4355 CHIPPEWA LANE, SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT, 7:10 p.m. • 7:28 p.m. Thomas and Kathleen McCaffrey, Applicants, were present. Joyce Shemanek, Neighbor, was present. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Weinberger stated the Applicants are proposing to rearrange a common lot line to transfer 1.80 acres from the property located at 4355 Chippewa Lane to 4265 Chippewa Lane. The existing 4355 parcel Is a legal conforming lot consisting of 6.92 acres and having a lot width of 370 feet. The transfer of 1.8 acres will result In a 5.12 acre parcel meeting the minimum lot size for the zoning district. The proposed lot division would transfer approximately 125 feet of frontage to the adjacent parcel, leaving only 245 feet of frontage where 300 feet is required. The second lot is almost one acre in size, with the transfer increasing the lot size to 2.80 acres. The lot would have 327 feet of frontage on Chippewa Lane. Weinberger stated with the iot iine rearrangement, the buildings would now meet the setback requirements for the zoning district b. would continue to be below the minimum lot size for this zoning district. Weinberger stated the lot line rearrangement is being proposed In this location due to the location of some septic sites on the 4265 parcel west of the house. The sites are located within the area to be transferred to the adjacent property. Additional testing was not completed on the property to identify additional sites on the lots. It Is possible the septic sites could be relocated to another site on the property. The second parcel also has two septic sites available near the east property line for the 4355 iot. Weinberger noted the proposed lot line rearrangement does not Increase the density between the Page 9 C r ORONO PLANNING CONLMISSION Monday, May 15,2000 two lots. Under the existing zoning, no future sutxlivision is possible. The lot would require a variance for lot width since the lot would become substandard. The lot line rearrangement would result in the 4355 lot being reduced in lot width to less than 300 feet and make it nonconforming. Weinberger noted some of the other lots in this area do not meet the 300 foot frontage requirement. The Applicants are also proposing to create a ten foot wide walking access to the Luce Line Trail for the 4265 lot. City Code does not address creating lots with walkways to access public land. Weinberger noted they have not heard any opposition to this walkway from the DNR. McCaffrey stated they are attempting with this lot line rearrangement to bring the lots more into compliance with the five acre zoning concept. McCaffrey stated they were only informed of the 300 foot frontage last week, which came as a surprise. McCaffrey stated out of the seven lots on Chippewa Lane, only one complies with the required frontage and one with the required acreage for this zoning district. McCaffrey stated he is unsure what the intent of the frontage requirement is. McCaffrey noted they have spent a considerable amount of money on surveys, title searches, and septic testing on this lot line rearrangement. Smith inquired why the Applicants are proposing to do this lot line rean-angement. McCaffrey stated they want to preserve their natural aesthetics. McCaffrey stated the Shemaneks are planning to retire and sell their property in the near future, which would allow for expansion of their lot as well as legal access down to the Luce Line. McCaffrey stated they also need to acquire some additional land to the west in order to accommodate a mound septic system in the future. Joyce Shemanek encouraged the Planning Commission to approve this lot line rearrangement, noting they are doing something which will help their neighbor. There were no further public comments regarding this application. Lindquist commented that the City will still end up with two non-conforming lots regardless of how the lot lot is rearranged. Smith inquired whether this would become a flag lot in the future. Weinberger stated based on the existing zone, the updated Comprehensive Plan is not proposing Page 10 ■ ' > ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 15,2000 any changes to the density in this area. Stoddard noted the Planning Commission has approved a walkway path down to the Luce Line In the past. Weinberger stated the DNR usually has concerns when people propose to remove trees down by the Luce Line In order to construct a walking path and gain access to the trail. Weinberger stated that should not be an issue In this case. Smith commented that the City should be advising Applicants that are proposing to construct a wallcA/ay to the Luce Line that they are not entitled to remove any trees or vegetation within the DNR's easement. Weinberger stated the Applicant has been informed of the easements in this area. Stoddard moved, Nygard seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2585, Thomas and Kathleen McCaffrey and Fred and Joyce Shemanek, 4265 and 4355 Chippewa Lane, for a subdivision lot tine rearrangement. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#3) #2587 RICHARD R. RUDD, 4575 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUBDIVISION FOR PLATTING A PUBLIC ROAD ADJACENT TO A PROPOSED SIX LOT PLAT LOCATED IN CITY OF MEDINA, 7:29 p.m. - 7:48 p.m. Kris Rudd. Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to plat a segment of a road that is Intended to be a public road over a lot located at 4575 Wayzata Boulevard West. The total length of the road located in Orono would be approximately 450 feet, ending in a cul-de-sac a! • k* east end of the property. Weinberger noted this lot Is adjacent to the City of Medina. Weinberger stated the entire concept for this development Involves having access off of Town Line Road, which is located in the western most part of Orono, with a double road entering the development, going through the Rudd property, and ending in a cul-de-sac. Issues relating to access have been raised in the past relating to properties located to the east of the prcpo ^d road. Page 11 I' If w TO:Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner FROM:Chris Pence, On-Site Systems Manager DATE:May 26, 2000 SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2585, Tom McCaffrey and Fred Shemanek, Lot Line Rearrangement, Chippewa Lane. The two properties in the proposed lot line rearrangement require the use of on-site sewage treatment systems. Soil borings and percolation tests were performed by S-P Testing, Inc. on April 13, 2000 to identify primary and alternate drainfield sites on each lot. The septic system at 4355 Chippewa Lane has been classified as non-compliant. A design has been submitted that meets all current State and City codes. The existing septic system will need to be replaced by December 31, 2010. If the septic system is found failing before that time, the septic must be replaced within 90 days. The septic system at 4265 Chippewa Lane has been classified as non-compliant. A design has been submitted that meets all current State and City codes. The existing septic system will need to be replaced by December 31, 2010. If the septic system is found failing before that time, the septic must be replaced within 90 days. Based on the above information, staff recommends approval of the lot line rearrangement. The City requires the drainfield sites be fenced off prior to any grading or land alt.^ration on these lots D if*-. TO: FROM: DATE: R£: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner May 10,2000 Thomas and Kathleen McCaffrey Fred and Joyce Shemanek 4265 and 4355 Chippewa Lane Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement Zoning: RR-1 A, One Family Rural Residential, 5 Acre Minimum lot size Application: To rearrange a common lot line to transfer 1.80 acres from property located at 4355 Chippewa Lane to 4265 Chippewa Lane. Lbt of Exhibits: K- A B C D E F G H Application Plat Map Property Survey/Site Plan Letter from Mike Gaffron (Dated 3/27/00) Zoning Map Legal Descriptions Site Topography Property Owners List Application Summary: The applicants have proposed to transfer a portion of4355 Chippewa Lane to 4265 Chippewa Lane. The existing 4355 parcel is a legal conforming lot consisting of 6.92 acres and having a lot width of 370'. The transfer of 1.8 acres will result in a 5.12 acre parcel meeting the minimum lot size for the zoning district. However the proposed lot division would transfer approximately 125' of frontage to the adjacent parcel leaving only 245' of frontage where 300' is required. The second lot is almost 1 acre is size and would increase in lot size to 2.80 acres. The lot would have 327' of frontage on Chippewa Lane._________________________________________ Thomas and Kathleen McCaffrey Fred and Joyce Shemanek 4265 and 4355 Chippewa Lane Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearnuigement May IS. 2000 pagt-l Total Area ANALYSIS 7.92 acres j • i VM Lot Area: (Existing) Lot Area: (Proposed) 4265 Chippewa Lane 4355 Chippewa Lane 4265 Chippewa Lane 4355 Chippewa Lzine Required Minimum Lot Size Area, Lot Width and Yard Requirements Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 5 acres 300 feet 100 feet 50 feet 100 feet Access: 1.00 acre 6.92 acres 2.80 acres 5.12 acres 5.00 acres Access to the properties would not change as a result of the proposed lot line rearrangement. Each lot would front on Chippewa Lane. Septic Sites: Applicants have completed septic testing for the properties that has been reviewed by Staff and preliminarily approved. The proposed 4265 parcel has identified septic sites to be located to the west of the house. The sites are located within the area to be transferred to the adjacent property. Additional testing was not completed on the property to identify additional sites on the lots. At issue is the identified sites do not allow the 4355 parcel to maintain at a 300' width. Sites have been identified near the east property line for die 4355 lot. Surrounding Properties: All property located around this site is in the RR-1A zoning district (Please refer to the attached zoning map Exhibit E.) The draft version of the updated Comprehensive Plan has guided the future land use of this site and all adjacent properties to be rural residential and rural service. Thomts and Kathleen McCaf&ey Fred and Joyce Shemanek 4265 and 4355 Chippewa Lane Subdivision of a Lot Line Reafrangement May 15. 2000 pagt-2 t : L-i- t.K All lots located on the north side of Chippewa Lane are between 1 and 2 acres and only 1 of the 7 lots has frontage of 300'. Lot Width Variance: Because the larger lot would result in less than 300' of frontage along Chippewa Lane a variance is required for lot width. The property is a legal conforming lot for lot area and lot width prior to subdivision. The only lot on the south side of the Chippewa Lane that is non-conforming is the 4265 lot. Primary Issues for Discussion: 1.Orono has approved lot line rearrangements in the past. In most cases when lots did not meet the minimum lot size requirements and the subdivision was approved the properties had existed as two residential sites in the past. The proposed lot line rearrangement does not increase the density between the two lots. Under the existing zoning no future subdivision is possible. Technically, the lot would require a variance for lot width since the lot would become substandard. 2.The lot line rearrangement results in the 4355 lot being reduced in lot width to less than 300'. This is significant because as the lot exists it is a conforming lot (lot area and lot width). 3.The Subdivision Code does not address creating lots with walkways to access public land. Proposed is to provide a 10' wide walking access to the Luce Line Trail for the 4265 lot. Planning Commission Options for Action: 1. 2. 3. 4. Approval of variances based on the Statement of Hardship. Denial of variances, stating reasons. Table, requesting further information and provide direction to the applicant. Other Action. Thomas and Kathleen McCafliey Fred and Joyce Shemanek 4265 and 4355 Chippewa Lane Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement May 15, 2000 pagt-3 % ■,s Application M Date Received Amount Paid S%^0 A CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATIONERTY LOCATION ^ / Siteaddress . o ti 4c/t a/ Property Identification Number (PID) ' ^3 ^6 Please check one - Property ^jr<abstract or^/.^^orrens? Attach legal description to application. APPLICANT Name f 'xJ ____________ Address Phone (home)^7^ ^/ZC Cwsy^^^/e !^A4/W'^ /Z7A/ Zip Phone (work) Jf3 Ki^y :^SS*7 OWNER (if different than applicant) , Name e Address ^ Citv^>f^/V /V j9^ A .^>V . Zip^ (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Phone (horned Phone (work)_________ Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land i Acres Total, all parcels iv Present use (check)Residential; no. of units f * ■ 1 ’ r< { •• " Other (specify) Present Zoning District ''A \ t PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes _________ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) _________ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites Existing Units _________New Units Total Units \ \ \t • r • / -r. Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per ___Acres Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify)_________ c. •> * «* •mr.. •- ■UN DATE tVM/tt MTCN S5« HENNEPIN COUNTY PHOPEHTY INFORNATION SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIA55A0I PACE St SR S1-11R-2S AS Otis tttSR ADDRESS UNASSIiNED . OWNER NAHE N P t E KNAPP < TAXPAYER WILLIAN F A EVELYN KNAPP NANE/ADOR tS CRISTOFOKX CXR NAPLE PUXN NN 55S59 *r r i.'.. i .if. • ( ; V »4Sri m^rn SR 51-118-2S AA 0001 tttss ADDRESS UNASSICNEO STATE OF NXNN STATE OF NX»M (DtOO (LUCE LINE TRAIL} . TOTAL BATCH 550 00020 Irj'ippeuy>a. La/)e^ M fy X CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORNATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OH THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY KM)HLEDGE AND BELIEF.. DATE J iUN MTE M/aVOO HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST MTCN SSt PROP AOOR OMNCR NAME tarpavEr NAHE/AINM SS SI-110-2S 41 OQIS ■4I4B RATERTONN RO ^ H R I H E PLANK MICHAEL R t MARY E PLANK 327 NORTH CARRINCTON BUFFALO NY 02654 PROP AOOR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SB Sl-llB-25 42 0600 BBBSB AOORESS UNASSI6NED STATE OP MINN STATE OP MINN fONRI (LUCE LINE TRAIL) PROP AROR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SB S1-11B-2S 42 BBll B4SBS CHIPPEHA LA . J L CORNICK i 0 L CORNICK'^ JANES t OEBRA CORNICK 4SB5 CHIPPEWA LA NAPLE PLAIN MN 55SS9 TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR S1>11B-2S 42^14 ^ BBS2B. TumHAnih) ^ /_ J L S V|?^INSKY JlPW N j ^ viMirv .m ^ ' Si .E PLAIN NN\^55S5» PROP Al TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO S1-1IB-2S 42 BB17 04565 CHIPPEWA LA J H PRITZLER ET AL J HARC PRITZLER ✓ OESYL L PETERSON 4SB5 CHIPPEWA LA MAPLE TwAIN MN 555S9 PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SB S1-11B-2S 4S 6662 BBBSB AOORESS UNASSI6NE0 STATE OF MINN STATE OF MINN (DNR) (LUCE LINE TRAIL) SB S1-118-2S 42 0001 D424S CHIPPEHA LA ROBERT LEWIS SORENSEN J 0 B 6 N ORANGAARD Y B509 CARDIFF LA EDEN PRAIRIE HH 55544 S6 31-118-23 42 B0B9 04325 CHIPPEHA LA * DANIFL ? B REBECCA J SCHULTZ ▼ OANIEL B REBECCA SCHULTZ 4325 CHIPPEHA LA NAPLE PLAIN NN S5359 3B 31-116-23 42 0012 04220 CHIPPEHA LA . PAMELA 6AIL ANDERSON ▼ PAMELA 6 ANDERSON 4220 CHIPPEHA LANE MAPLE PLAINS NN 55559 38 31-116-23 42 0015 B4360 CHIPPEWA LA L E NARTINEAU/J N HARTINEAU LARRY E B JEAN H HARTINEAU 4360 CHIPPEHA LA MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 SB 31-116-23 42 0016 B032B TURNHAH RD J L K R P ZELINSKY JR J L B R P ZELINSKY JR 320 TURNHAN RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 36 31-118-23 43 0011 00145 TURNHAH RD BEAL SAVINOS BANC OAVIO A DETERS ✓ 145 TURNHAH RO MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 REPORT NO. PI4SS401 PACE 29 38 31-11S-23 42 0002 04265 CHIPPEWA LA y T J t K L MCCAFFREY ^ THOMAS J MCCAFFREY 4265 CHIPPEHA LA MAPLE PLAIN MN 65559 38 31-116-23 42 0010 04315 CHIPPEHA LA GREGORY HALLOIN EJAL GREGORY HALLDIN Y 4315 CHIPPEHA LANE NAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 '^B\ 31-118-23 42^( IN RD 0013 003^0, TURNHAf J L B R^P^ELINSKY JR J L B I^'^ZELINSKY JR 320 JHimilAM RO MAPLE PLAIN MN\^55359 38 31-116-23 42 0016 04355 CHIPPEHA LA F E JR B J E SNENANEK H FREDERICK E SHEHANEK JR RT 2 BOX 16 MAPLE PLAIN )OI 55359 M S1-X18-23 880X 008M ADDRESS UNASSIGHED STATE OF NXNN STATE OF NXNN CDNR) (LUCE LXNE TRAXL? 5S SX-XX8-25 AS 80XA 00X65 CRXSTOFORX CIR J R I J K LESSER ✓ JOHN LESSER X65 CRXSTOFORX CXR NAPLE PLAXN NN 55359 o 4. r Application Date: 4/20/00 Completion Date: 4/20/00 Deadline: 8/18/00 coijMcn meeting JUN ] 2 2000 Cl IY Ur unuivU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: June 5,2000 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Zoning: U2567 Richard Rudd 4S7S Wayzata Boulevard Preliminary Road Plat RR-1 A, One Family Rural Residential, 5 Acre Minimum lot size A p plication: To plat the eastern portion of a public road to provide potential access to four lots in Orono. List of Exhibits: A B C D E F Resolution Property Owners Map Proposed Plan Notice of Planning Commission Action Planning Commission Minutes (May 15,2000) Planning Report Background: Orono, Medina, MNDOT, representatives of the Burlington Northern Railroad and adjacent property owners have been discussing providing access to several properties in Orono that currently have direct access to Highway 12 over the Burlington Northern railroad tracks. Access to the properties has been in place for many years and continued by a licence agreement between the railroad and the properties. Please refer to Exhibit F indicating the location of the railroad crossing and potentially “landlocked ” parcels. The railroad has indicated that their long range goal is to eliminate this crossing for s^ety reasons. It is also an objective for f4NDOT lo eliminate this hazardous direct driveway access to Highway 12. Representatives from all agencies involved and the property owners have considered several options to dev elop a permanent and safe access for properties that could potentially become landlocked in the future. A concept plan was reviewed by the Orono City Council on April 10, 2000 that has * r. proposed a public road with access to Toutiline Road in Medina. This option would eliminate the access over the railroad to Highway 12. Greg Gappa has noted in his memo to the City Council, dated April 10, 2000 (attached to Planning Report), that MNDOT has offered to pay for the road construction and provide access to the properties that will lose access across the railroad provided that the Cities or property owners provide the necessary right-of-way and easements. Also, please read the attached minutes from the Council meeting. This proposal would create the road segment in Orono to provide -access to the properties. It appears the property owmers to the east (Slaughter and Hickey) have existing easements in place over the Fraizer property to accommodate a shared driveway. Proposed Plan: The plan indicates a road that would serve a proposed subdivision in Medina and provide access to the potentially landlocked properties in Orono. The Medina property is zoned for single family residential use at a 30,000 s.f minimum lot size. The properties in Medina would be served with sewer and water which will be extended from Townline Road. No utilities will be extended to properties in Orono. The proposed road in Medina will be public and it is recommended by Staff the road in Orono will be public as well, primarily due to maintenance issues. Only the eastern 450' of the road will be in Orono. Surrounding Properties: The properties located in Medina are zoned for a minimum lot size of 30,000 s.f. A proposal has been made by the applicant to have that subdivision completed this summer. The lots in Orono are all zoned for a 5 acre minimum lot size, and guided by the Comprehensive Plan for .single family residential. With the exc ption of the Rudd property, no lots in Orono will be impacted for zoning purposes by the proposed road. The Rudd property would maintain a dry buildable area of approximately 7-8 acres. If the dry buildable area is less than 10 acres dry, the property would not be able to subdivide into two 5 acre lots. The total frontage along the proposed road is only about 500' which does not provide the total lot width required in the zoning district. New lots require a minimum lot width of 300' in the RR-IA distict. r Road Standards: Because most of the proposed road is in Medina it is appropriate to create a right-of-way to standards in Medina to maintain consistency. Medina will require a 60' right-of-way which is shown on the preliminary plan. The road width and size of cul-de-sac will also be developed to standards set by the City of Medina. The cul-de-sac shall be a minimum paved width of 80' and a minimum right-of- way width of 100'. Ponding and Grading: The applicants are developing a ponding and grading plan for the road. This is an on-going project involving the platting of the land to the north in Medina. They have proposed z ' TJRP pond south of the road, in Orono. The pond would collect nmoff from the new road and from the newly platted ‘ K area to the north. The ponding calculations and grading plan, when complete, shall be submitted to both cities for review and approval prior to the final plan set being approved and recorded. Final Approval and Time Schedule: It is the intent of the applicant to have the preliminary platting completed for the lots in Medina this summer. However, final platting and road construction will not be complete until about 2003. The Rudds have stated MnDOT will pay for the road and engineering costs if it is constructed in 2003. The applicant has stated there are two primary reasons to not plat the road this year. The first is MnDOT would only reimburse for the materials, not engineering and other costs. Secondly, if the new lots in Medina are recorded the property owner may be subject to a higher tax obligation on six buildable lots rather than one that exists today. The applicant will be requesting the preliminary subdivision approval be granted automatic renewals through 2003 when they will complete the final plat. Burlington Northern Railroad has indicated to the City of Orono they would be willing to pay for completing a road plat across the property located in Medina. Please read the attached comments from Burlington Railroad. Prior to final plat the following additional information shall be provided by the applicant and approved by the City of Orono. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Final grading and erosion control plan set Stormwater calculations for the drainage area that will drain towards the pond in Orono List of all easements that are recorded on the Rudd property Easement documentation indicating legal access to the Slaughter and Hickey properties over the Fraizer property Final construction plans for the road Final plat drawing for recording the right-of-way Applicant shall dedicate to the City an easement for the NURP pond. Planning Commission Recommendation: At their May 15,2000 meeting the Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plans by a vote of 5 to 0. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat based on the resolution attached. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To adopt or amend the attached resolution. **■'' ^ .fc. l- >S J v; r* • r It’f. -: » : Vb... A RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY ROAD PLAT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4575 WAYZATA BOULEVARD PID 30-118-23 31 0004 FILE NO. 2587 WHEREAS, Kris Rudd (hereinafter the "subdivider") on behalf of Richard R. Rudd, filed an application with the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") requesting preliminary platting of a section of public road easement located on property at 4575 Wayzata Boulevard. The property is legally described as follows: The West Half of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the east 148.50 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter all in Section 30, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 164 et. seq. and the City of Orono ’s Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 15,2000, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on June 12,2000 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the subdivider noting the following findings of fact: FINDINGS 1.The property is located within the RR-1A Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum lot size of five acres dry buildable land. 2. The property contains less than 10 acres of dry buildable land and 473.11 feet lot width. Page 1 of 6 4 ArtTfi TrtT~i ii'i III 1 r r fl iir mm-• *»**■--* t-.. o 'k 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Subdivision of property in the RR-1A zoning district requires a minimum of 5 acres of dry buildable land and 300 feet of width along a public road. Subdivision of the property is not permitted based on the lot area and lot width requirements for the zoning district. Platting of the road would result in the lot remaining conforming for lot area and lot width. Orono, Medina, Mn/DOT, representatives of the Burlington Northern Railroad and adjacent property owners have been discussing providing access to several properties in Orono tlwt currently have direct access to Highway 12 c^jr the Burlington Northern railroad tracks. Access to the properties has been in place for many years and continued by a licence agreement between the railroad and the properties. The railroad has indicated that their long range goal is to eliminate this crossing for safety reasons. The road layout indicates a road that will serve a proposed subdivision to the north in Medina and provide access to the potentially landlocked properties in Orono. The Medina property is zoned for single family residential use at a 30,000 s.f. minimum lot size. The properties in Medina would be served with sewer and water which is available in Townline Road. No utilities will be extended to properties in Orono as tlie Comprehensive Plan has guided the properties for rural residential services. The properties in Orono are not within the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA), and therefore are not allowed to be provided with sanitary sewer service. The proposed i t >rm water management plan will include construction ot a pond on the 4575 Wa>/ata Boulevard lot. A MCWD permit will be required for the grading, storm water management and erosion control on the site, including the future lots in Medina. It is the intent of t!.. subdivider to not file an application for a final plat approval in Medina and/or Orono until 2003 due to funding availability from Mn/DOT. 10. Most of the proposed road is in Medina; therefore, it is appropriate to plat and develop the right-of-way to standards in Medina to maintain consistency. Medina Page 2 of 6 r- I • ■ft will require a 60' right-of-way which is shown on the preliminary plan. The road width and size of cul-de-sac will also be developed to standards set by the City of Medina. The cul-de-sac shall be a minimum paved width of 80' and a minimum right-of-way width of 100'. 11.It appears there would be private easements in place to provide access to lots located at 4545 and 4301 Wa: rata Boulevard. They would access the proposed cul-de-sac via a private easement over the 4555 Wayzata Boulevard property. Access to the 4301 Wayzata Boulevard lot would require a legal easement over the property located at 4545 Wayzata Boulevard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary’ road plat application for Robb. R. Rudd per the preliminary plat drawings by Otto Associates Engineers and Land Surveyors, Inc., attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: 1.The storm water retention pond shall be developed to NURP standards and be protected by granting of a drainage and utility easement to ensure the area will not be developed, and drainageways are protected. 2.The road shall be dedicated as a public road and developed to standards established by the City of Medina, subject to a Developers Agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Road construction can begin as soon as the engineering plans for the road as well as stormwater management plans have been approved by the City, the Developers Agreement has been executed, and the final plat has been recorded with Hennepin County. 3.Subdivider is hereby advised that the City will not grant final plat approval until the MCWD has approved all grading and drainage improvements on the property. 4.The Council recognizes the applicants may not proceed with a final plat application in Medina until 2003. Therefore the Council agrees to waive the one year requirement for final t^iproval, and agrees to extend the final plat application deadline to December 31,2003. Should the subdivider fail to complete the filing of the final plat application within the deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary application with the City. Page 3 of 6 AM . -j .a '■M ^‘■ •% r -^ . - ^3-rv ‘*C. ■;■' f •'t v r 5.Prior to Final Plat approval, a final grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Fittal Plat Submittals: The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City’s records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1” = 200'. Drawing to include: a.Road platted per preliminary survey by Otto Associates Engineers and Land Surveyors, Inc. b. Dedication of drainage and utility easement over the area of the NURP pond. c. The naming of plat and public road. Legal documents required: Title information addressed to the City, acceptable to the City Attorney, indicating ownership of the property. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b.Signed and executed Developer’s Agreement and letter of credit for approved site improvements, landscaping and construction of private road (Outlot A), stormwater and drainage facilities, etc. c.Signed and executed Drainage Easements to be taken over drainageway and detention areas within plat. Page 4 of 6 4 A' .-^4- ■ 3. Fees to be paid; Total due: $400.00* a. Final plat fee = $200.00 b.Legal review and filing fees for subdivision and associated documents $200.00 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 12th day of June, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of June, 2000, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 r* i. i > 1 V.*O c:> « N N r ^ \ ^*J >< ^ r ^ k’: \ jt r\ 'riftm L .-.r. -V’,frl> t. *f. K CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 PHONE:(952)249-4600 FAX:(952)249-4616 ZONING FILE #2587 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACIION DATE OF NOTICE: May 18,2000 TO: Kris Rudd 601 Park Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION:___Variance ___Conditional Use Permit X_Subdivision Other DATE OF MEETING: May 15,2000 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: X Approval as submitted ___Approval subject to conditions noted below ___Denial for reasons noted below ___Tabled for reasons noted below ___No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: You are scheduled to appear before the City Council on Monday, June 12,2000. If you have any questions please contact the Zoning Department at (952) 249-4600. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. O' ! .» y ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 15,2000 L K any changeS^the density in this area. Stoddard noted th^^^lanning Commission has approved a walkway path down to the Luce Line in the past. Weinberger stated the DNR usih^W has concerns when people propose to remove trees down by the Luce Line In order to construct a wblj^ing path and gain access to the trail. Weinberger stated that should not be an issue in this case. Smith commented that the City should be advisingWiicants that are proposing to construct a wallcway to the Luce Line that they are not entitled to reimv^any trees or vegetation within the ONR's easement. • Weinberger stated the Applicant has been informed of the eajpM^Q^ ^- Stoddard moved, Nygard seconded, to recommend approval of Applicatton #2585, Thomas and Kathleen McCaffrey and Fred and Joyce Shemanek, 4265 and 4sHs^hippewa Lane, for a subdivision lot line rearrangement. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ^ (#3) #2587 RICHARD R. RUDD, 4575 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUBDIVISION FOR PLATTING A PUBLIC ROAD ADJACENT TO A PROPOSED SIX LOT PLAT LOCATED IN CITY OF MEDINA, 7:29 p.m. - 7:48 p.m. Kris Rudd, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant Is proposing to plat a segment of a road that Is Intended to be a public road over a lot located at 4575 Wayzata Boulevard West. The total length of the road located In Orono would be approximately 450 feet, ending in a cul-de-sac at the east end of the property. Weinberger noted this lot is adjacent to the City of Medina. Weinberger stated the entire concept for this development Involves having access off of Town Line Road, which is located in the western most part of Orono, with a double road entering the development, going through the Rudd property, and ending In a cul-de-sac. Issues relating to access have been raised In the past relating to properties located to the east of the proposed road. Page 11 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 15,2000 k '-f m Currently the four lots located In Orono are all served by a shared driveway that has existed for some time over the Burlington Railroad. Weinberger stated the road has operated In the past with a license agreement between the railroad and the properties. Weinberger stated it is unclear whether there has ever been legal access given to the property owners, which In essence means the railroad could shut the access down If they so choose. Weinberger Indicated the railroad is not proposing to shut the access down at this time, with an objective of Mn/DOT to eliminate direct driveway access to Highway 12. Weinberger staled the proposed road would provide driveway easements to the cu-de-sac, with two lots to the north having access to the road via easements. This option would eliminate the access over the railroad to Highway 12. Mn/DOT Is also proposing to dose the intersection between Town Line Road and Highway 12 due to safety concerns, which has not been approved at this time. Weinberger stated the proposed road would provide access to a proposed six lot plat In Medina and to the four existing lots In Orono. The Medina property Is zoned for single family residential use, which will be served by City sewer and water. No utilities will be extended to properties in Orono. Weinberger stated the City still needs the following information: 1. Final grading and erosion control plan set. 2. Stonmwater calculations for the drainage area that will drain towards the pond In Orono. 3. List of all easements that are recorded on the Rudd property. 4. Easement documentation Indicating legal access to the Slaughter and Hickey properties ovfer the Fraizer property. 5. Final construction plans for the road. 6. Final plat drawing for recording the right-of-way. 7. Applicant shall dedicate to the City an easement for the NURP pond. City Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plans. Rudd stated Weinberger has given a good summary of the issues involved In this application. Page 12 • «• • ;‘.‘r r ‘ y ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May IS, 2000 Jane Slaughter, 4545 Wayzala Boulevard, stated she Is In favor of the road but would like to see the road extended somewhat. Slaughter stated she will need to maintain a longer driveway with her neighbor, but is still in favor of the road. Slaughter stated the railroad Is required to give a 30 day notice if they intend to dose that access, which causes some concern because her property would then become legally landlocked if that access is denied. Slaughter commented she has been turned down by 13 title companies because the lease agreement is not legally recognized. Weinberger stated these lots do not have direct access to what would be considered a public road. and without the access across the railroad, there is no way to guarantee iong-term access to the properties. Representatives on behalf of the railroad have indicated they are not in favor of providing a permanent easement to open this up as a public entrance due to safety and maintenance issues. Weinberger acknowledged this access does potentially create a hardship for the neighbors in that their properties could eventually become landlocked unless some other access Is provided. Weinberger stated the railroad has indicated they are willing to leave this access open until another access is provided. Weinberger stated it is not the objective of the Planning Commission to discuss long-term access to these properties, which is being addressed by the platting of this road. Wtinberger stated the Issue before the Planning Commission is whether the platting of this road within the development is appropriate. Smith commented that what is being proposed makes sense, noting she is sympathetic to the , landowners that could potentially be landlocked unless easements are provided up to this new road. Weinberger stated the property owners would need to obtain private easements from the other access.property owners to gain driveway Smith noted that Lot 4545 would need to obtain an easement from Lot 4555. Weinberger stated they currently do have easements over a portion of that lot, but would be required to obtain additional easements all the way across to Town Line Road prior to the road construction. Page 13 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 15,2000 Smith commented that there appears to be a 20 foot easement already In place connecting to the new road. Slaughter stated there also is a 33 foot easement that exists. Weinberger stated there Is documentation showing almost overlapping easements which would provide access back to the property as well. Weinberger stated there apparently is a cartway which exists In this area, which has never been legally recorded and was never used. Weinberger stated there is a 33 foot easement from 1910 which could provide d;i‘»eway access as well. Qerg inquired what easement Slaughter Intends to use. the cartwo v or the 33 foot easement. Slaughter stated she would use the easement along Town Line. Lindquist stated the Planning Commission Is simply approving that section of road that is being proposed tonight and does not really have any junsdiction to hear any other issues relating to easements or the railroad access. Smith commented that there appears to be some options for the property owners relating to access, but noted the Planning Commission is not in a position to hear those matters at this time. There were no further public comments regarding this application. Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2587, 4575 Wayzata Boulevard, Subdivision for Platting a Public Road Adjacent to a Proposed Six Lot Plat Located in the City of Medina, subject to the seven conditions contained in the May 15,2000 Planner's Report. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. NEW E 4ESS, CONTINUED (#6) #2580 TIMOT [TRIM, 1360 RAILROAD AVENUE - VARIANCE, 7:49 p.m. - 7:55 p.m. Timothy Pattrin, Applicant, was pn Bottenberg stated the Applicants are proposIngw'ooQStmct a 624 square fool attached garage addition to the north side of the existing residence. The propeity4& located on the comer of Railroad Avenue and Spates Avenue, with the existing driveway being utiiizM4Q^provide access to Page 14 t ii Jt * TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commissioners Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: RE: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner May 11,2000 #2587 Robb R. Rudd 4575 Wayzata Boulevard West Preliminary Road Plat in Orono Zoning: RR-1 A, One Family Rural Residential, 5 Acre Minimum lot size Application: The property owner has made an application with the City of Orono to plat a segment of a road that is intended to be a public road over a lot located at 4575 Wayzata Boulevard West. The total length of the road, in Orono, would be approximately 450' ending in a cul-de-sac at the east end of the property. List of Exhibits A B C D E F G H I .\pplication Concept Plan Rudd Property/Proposed Roadway Request for Council Action - Greg Gappa (April 10,2000) City Council Minutes (April 10,2000) E.\isting Driveway Access Plat Map ZoningA^ocation Map Property Owners Notification List Background Orono, Medina, MNDOT, representatives of the Burlington Northern Railroad and adjacent property owners have been discussing providing access to several properties in Orono that currently have direct access to Highway 12 over the Burlington Northern railroad tracks. Access to the properties has been in place for many years and continued by a licence agreement betw'een the railroad and the properties. Please refer to Exhibit F indicating the location of the railroad crossing and potentially “landlocked ” parcels. The railroad has indicated that their long range goal is to eliminate this crossing for safety reasons. It is also an objective for MNDOT to eliminate direct driveway access to Highway 12. #2587 Robb R. Rudd 4575 Wiyzau Boulevard West Preliminary Road Plat in Orono ^fay n 2000 IL^ 3 i % Representatives from all agencies involved and the property owners have considered several options to develop a permanent and safe access for properties that could potentially become landlocked in the future. A concept plan was reviewed by the Orono City Council on April 10, 2000 that has proposed a public road with access to Townline Road in Medina. The road would provide access to a proposed 6 lot plat in Medina and to the 4 existing lots in Orono. This option would eliminate the access over the railroad to Highway 12. Greg Gappa has noted in his memo to the City Council, dated April 10, 2000, (Exhibit D) that MNDOT has offered to pay for the road construction and provide access to the properties that will lose access across the railroad provided that the Cities or property owners provide the necessary right-of-way and easements. Also, please read the attached minutes from the Council meeting. This proposal would create the road segment in Orono to provide access to the properties. It appears the property owners to the east (Slaughter and Hickey) have existing easements in place over the Fraizer property to accommodate a shared driveway. Proposed Plan The proposed road layout and lot layout are attached as Exhibits B and C. The plan shows a road that will serve a proposed 6 lot subdivision in Medina and provide access to the potentially landlocked properties in Orono. The Medina property is zoned for single family residential use at a 30,000 s.f. minimum lot size. The properties in Medina would be served with sewer and water which is available in Townline Road. No utilities will be extended to properties in Orono. The proposed road in Medina will be public and it is recommended by Staff the road in Orono will be public as well, primarily due to maintenance issues. Only the last 450’ of the road will be in Orono. Road Access from Townline Road Townline Road currently has access to Highway 12 under the railroad. MNDOT has also discussed closing the access due to safety issues. This would require all access to the new road in Medina to be from the south along Townline Road. Townline Road would end in a cul-de-sac before the railroad tracks. This would require the residential traffic to pass by the Creekwood Trail neighborhood. However closing the access to Highway 12 would eliminate thru traffic connecting from Highway 12 to parts of Orono and Independence via Townline Road. Surrounding Properties The properties located in Medina are zoned for a minimum lot size of 30,000 s.f. A proposal has been made by the applicant to have that subdivision completed this summer. The lots in Orono are all zoned for a 5 acre minimum lot size, and guided by the Comprehensive Plan for single family residential. With the exception of the Rudd property, no lots in Orono will be impacted for zoning purposes by the proposed road. The Rudd property would maintain a dry buildable area of *2587 Robb R. Rudd 4575 Wayziu Boulevard West Preltfuiniry Road Plat in Orono Xfay IS, 2000 pagt-2 '3 approximately 7-8 acres. If the dry buildable area is less than 10 acres dry, the property would not be able to subdivide into two 5 acre lots. The total frontage along the proposed road is only about 500’ which does not provide the total lot width required in the zoning district. New lots require a minimum lot width of 300' in the RR-1A distict. Road Standards Because most of the proposed road is in Medina it is appropriate to create a right-of-way to standards in Medina to maintain consistency. Medina will require a 60' right-of-way which is shown on the preliminary plan. The road width and size of cul-de-sac will also be developed to standards set by the City of Medina. The cul-de-sac shall be a minimum paved width of 80' and a minimum right-of- way width of 100'. Ponding and Grading The applicants are developing a ponding and grading plan for the road. This is an on-going project involving the platting of the land to the north in Medina. They have proposed a NURP pond south of the road, in Orono. The pond would collect runoff from the new road and from the newly platted area to the north. The ponding calculations and grading plan, when complete, shall be submitted to both cities for review and approval prior to the final plan set being approved and recorded. Final Approval and Time Schedule Medina's schedule is to have the plat approval process completed by July 1st, so the process for securing funding from MNDOT can begin. Both cities must approve the plans prior to recording. A final plan set to the City of Orono shall include, at a minimum, the following information: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Final grading and erosion control plan set Stormwrater calculations for the drainage area that will drain towards the pond in Orono List of all easements that are recorded on the Rudd property Easement documentation indicating legal access to the Slaughter and Hickey properties over the Fraizer property Fir.al construction plans for the road Final plat drawing for recording the right-of-way Applicant shall dedicate to the City an easement for the NURP pond. #2587 Robb R. Rudd 4575 Wayzau DoulevMd West Prtlimtniry Road Plat in Orono May !5. 2000 pagt-3 Sr' J Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plans and to proceed to the June12,2000 City Council meeting for preliminary approval. Final approval could be complete by June 26th. Planning Commbsion Options for Action: 1. Recommend approval of the preliminary plan and forward to the Council. 2. Recommend denial, stating reasons. 3. Table, requesting further information and provide direction to the applicant. 4. Other Action. 4 tV '"I « i •2517 Robb R. Rudd 4375 Wtyzata Boulevvd West Preliminaiy Rotd Plat in Orono Mv ty pagi-4 ■ V • *1 V' .•r: Application ff 2~QS"1 Date Receivei T HIpT> Amount Paid 4l^^5'00 A CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATIONDlVl 1 XjV/V^/\ t AV/il 7N 1 Jli \ i5S7^-3Lm Site address ^ f/?7*0 WiVY^aiTa/F>lvd ~ ^>ZX^ Property Identification Number (PID) ^Dl \ ^ 'L'^’% ) DDD^__________ Please check one - Property ____abstract or_____torrens? Attach legal description to application. applicant . Name r\ft\S KuP>D Address (j?ni Pav ^K- A-ClnP. City_____Loit-/________________MN-> Phone (home) & Zip ^^<?Phone (work) 1?A Z- OWNER (ifdifferent than applicant) 'o f) a X\ Name g\CJhav^(\ R. KuC\rf / ShOUf. K. Ku(1 ___________ Address Tn rl<_ * Phone (home) ^73 *7SCe> City LffV^Q Uace^ MVO Zip^^Phone (work) J{J±ZZd^ (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______(1"'^ PROPOSAL _________ Division for Tax Purposes _________ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) _________ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites _________Existing Units _________New Units Total Units ) Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per ___Acres t Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land Residential _ Other (specify) J1 r. . i'-' K. :.• I -i I ’. 4 ii Lr- "'"^IL MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIOiN APR 1 0 2m, 1 f ut OROtJO DATE: April 10, 2000 ITEM NO.: /3 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer ’s Report Item Description: Update on Townline Road Access Background Information We have received a concept plan for a proposed access road east of Townline Road. This issue has been discussed at several previous Council meetings. There are four properties in Orono and one property in Medina that currently have access to Highway 12 via a shared driveway across the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. These properties only have a "licence" from the railroad to cross the tracks which is not a guaranteed permanent option. Our understanding is that the railroad could revoke this licence at any time, thus leaving the properties landlocked. The railroad has indicated that their long range goal is to eliminate this crossing for safety reasons. Also, MNDOT’s goal is to eliminate the driveway access to Highway 12. An access road from Townline Road to serve these properties appears to be the best solution. To help facilitate closing the shared driveway access onto Highway 12, MNDOT has offered to pay for the construction of a new road to provide alternate access for these properties. MNDOT will pay for the road construction provided that the Cities or property owners provide the necessary Right of Way and easements. Concept Plan The attached concept plan shows a platted road that will serve a proposed subdivision in Medina and also provide access to the landlocked properties in Medina and Orono. The property in Medina is zoned for single family residential at a 30,000 square foot minimum lot size with sewer and water. There is existing sewer and water utilities in Townline Road. City of Medina staff has indicated that this will be a public road in Medina. Because only a small percentage of the Road is in Orono, we are recommending that the road in Orono up to the cul-de-sac also be a public road. To have only a small segment of private road at the end would not be practical or feasible for maintenance purposes. For routine maintenance of this road, our recommendation is that an agreement be reached with the City of Medina for Orono to provide snowplowing for this road. Orono currently maintains Townline Road and has trucks in the area. This area is isolated from the rest of the City of Medina by the railroad tracks, and when the Townline Road railroad underpass is closed access from Medina to this area will be difficult. We currently have agreements s in place with the City of Medina for trading different segments of roads for plowing depending on which City has easier access. D I The public road would be platted with a 60-foot wide Right of Way and cul-de-sac at the Rudd’s east property line. Sixty feet is a standard Right of Way width in Medina, so it makes sense to continue this width to the end of the road. The proposed concept is for two driveways off of the cul-de-sac. One driveway will serve the Fraizer property. The other driveway would be a shared driveway to serve the Slaughter and Hickey properties. Our understanding is the Slaughter’s ar.i Hickey’s have an access easement for a driveway across the Fraizer property. A copy of these easement documents should be provided to the City for our review to verify that there is a legal access for all of the properties. The road in Orono should be built to the same standards as the road in Medina. Varying the road standards for the small segment of road in Orono is not practical. Project Schedule This project will require plat approval in both Orono and Medina. Medina’s schedule is to have the plat approval process completed by July 1”, so the process for securing funding from MNDOT can be started. Our understanding is that the proposed schedule for the road construction with MNDOT funding is scheduled for 2003 at the same time the new traffic signal is installed at the Highway 12/ County Road 29 intersection. We are recommending that this road be constructed as soon as possible to eliminate the hazardous driveway on Highway 12.The proposed schedule is for the Council to review and provide comments on this concept plan at this meeting. Rudd’s will then submit an application for preliminary plat approval for the May Orono Planning Commission meeting on May 15^**. Preliminary and final plat approval could then be completed by the Council in May and June to meet the July 1“ deadline. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Review and discuss proposed concept plan for a new access road east of Townline Road • • ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 10,2000 r 10. 2600 Joint Use Dock Licenses—Continued Pheasant Lawn HA, Walters Port Maintenance and Improvement Association, Victoria Estates and Kelly Cove HA (subject to completion of covenants) for the period of January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000; and to Sandy Beach, Carlson/Nelson/Gage and Big Island Vets Camp for the period January 1, 1999 to December 31,2000. Mayor/Council Report, Items 11, and 12 appear after Item 13. '#1- ENGINEER REPORT 13. Concept Plan for an Access Road East of Townline Road Gappa stated that the neighbors have been working with Oiono, Medina, and the railroad company to find a solution to the Townline Road access issue. There are 4 properties in Orono and 1 in Medina that currently have access to Highway 12 via a shared driveway across the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. The Railroad would like to remove the crossing and Mn/DOT wants to eliminate the driveway access to Highway 12. An access road from Townline Road to the properties is the best solution. Mn/DOT has offered to pay for the road construction provided the Cities and propert>' owners provide the necessary Right-of-Way and easements. Townline Road crosses city lines between Medina and Orono. The goal is to get this to the Planning Commission next month and have the preliminary and final plat approval by July 1, 2000. Gappa stated that the zoning code states 3 houses require a road, but he questioned if that was necessary since the homes have shared a driveway for years and no more houses will be built off that road. Staff recommendation is to allow a private driveway to serve these houses. Medina has stated that Townline Road will be a public road, and he recommended that the cul-de-sac in Orono also be a public road and that it has the same width as the Medina section. He also stated that Orono and Medina have agreements for the switching of road plowing and the best solution would be for Orono to plow the road in exchange for plowing of another road. Medina would take care of other maintenance, such as sweeping and patching. Kris Rudd of 601 Park Lane, Long Lake stated that she and her neighbors planned the road and feel it is a good idea. Jane Slaughter of 4545 Wayzata Boulevard, Orono mentioned that the Railroad had ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 10,2000 li' 1^ i. J3. Concept Plan for an Access Road East of Townline Road —Continued agreed to pay for one of her neighbor’s driveway extensions. Mayor Jabbour stated that the neighbors, Medina, Mn/DOT, and the Railroad came up with the proposal. The neighbors want to know if Orono will cooperate through platting and subdividing, and would they make the new access road in Orono a public road. This is an area of the City where new roads are supposed to be private. He stated that if it does not cost the City anything, they are happy to make this a public road. Ed Otto, a land surveyor w'orking for Kris Rudd, stated that they anticipate the Kearns property and the Rudd property that’s in Medina will be a regular 505 subdivision plat. He doesn’t see that working quite as well in Orono and would like to see them use a State Statute 164 right-of-way plat. Mayor Jabbour asked who will build the road. Gappa stated it would be built by the property owners through a development agreement. Otto stated he would draw the plans. f- MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Mayor Jabbour asked the Council to pass a resolution recognizing Dave Childs’ contribution to the City of Orono. Sansevere moved, and Peterson seconded, to pass Resolution No. 4^.55 commending Dave Childs for his outstanding service to the City of Orono. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ENGINEER REPORT, CONT. *11. Webber Hills Sanitary Sewer Project A. Declare Cost to be Assessed and Order Preparation of Proposed Assessment—Resolution No. 4452 B. Schedule Assessment Hearing —Resolution No. 4453 Flint moved, and Prterson seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4452 declaring cost to be assessed arJ ordering preparation of proposed assessment for the Webber Hills Saniatary Sewer Project. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Flint moved, and Peterson seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4453 scheduling a ^•9 ^ *• * s r « * J-i-/f. 1 : !r-- I- *- A- ^r-^', '/ •■■ ~ \’'Awl'^ ; !i V N C >/■ “/ -- - - '•Wiw- I |_j.y/=Jr \ x\ ./ " N.A j. l/^// i ' ll*V** i^ v''*i ' * ** ^ i| < • V ' I I ........— i • /• ' \ ■' -v-i ■^•■" 7 - ■ - ■ ■ t' A< / 0.' ••. • '• • •' V;v// 5 4^='. . .'■ A'/'■' V;^/ #/? • • I ' ; s .// •/. • / /K / V / • ^ « -/ o o, • i i II :------------------------------------------------------------------ iV ^ /^c* *»•! »r-••• • / 4- i/i^- ^•9 V’• II# tr • I T/i.-* *• -■• fll. #%.4.. 4/4 /%f • / T ^r 2.* Tl If • Mu t5 ’/'//^-5 -/' ! i 7^///^/ '4./■h^ XF-^- ’j;;-:* .• • . v:A Iz-yl- -1^“'- ' ii‘.- i- / -7 Jiil' ■•» ; • -j J J k ';=^—u i Jit.. » . ' -it ____r ____ ' I' ' ^ “1 ------•/ T~ ■ '■■" . ni • • t ? •. . • -• yo C ^. » V »u*:-q: * *y‘ V*** • /*r *•'—'*'i A--*t=3*-a o •• V. V* - / Xn ^ /, /l/ / '' C> / »/ / 1 r* u«*r» If" »<U'. rMf'A / :^/ .,./io' 'W'-'' / ^/ /'^Z' S'k/A// / / /^ '/y/ V'. ThW flE. i V^C* ▼* »r- ^ I Hu ""N• I % •.*.*•*. - • -I i / *f 5 • n ■■:—» • • '.'V.-A ;i.% • • . • • •• ' ; /#■: /' -----ipyMm Xf fl iV'-. ^f^'} IMt:: I J'- 'fl tK 'ft /' ; > </ i.<»C* ft. ... * f »l. I ¥, »r . •ri #f iHu Q 14/ / >-v / > jU Nv~ 2 .*} 41 o 5 « 5 S " I li 2»>% «r\ *’< «• •/ai« !•*/* *> M < Ul •< 0 *y2,S'<aa-f J i s'"S'' lilsi ^ O ^a" »i «i9 9 ^ ^ 0 3 /A * ftjk ^00 »; 05 ^!!s|5 I 9 ?2 ■ ii l< ___ -Ol'-ilfc- - ‘*f: MTCM Si2 « mm TARPAVfl IMNE/AOM 56 S6-ne-23 31 6063 66fSS MAVZATA BLVD W CARY L 6 BEVERLY A FRAZIER CARY B BEVERLY FRAZIER ABBS NAYZATA BLVD N NAPLE ruin NN BB3B9 NAHE TARPAYER NAHE/ABOR SB 36-116-23 32 6661 611B6 TOMN LINE RD N B B TNEIS niCMAEL L THEIS 1166 TONNLINE RO NAPLE PLAIN NN BB3B9 OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR 36 36-116-23 32 666B 61626 TOWN LINE RO T J LUNIESKX B J P WAHL T J LtBIXESXX S J P WAHL 1626 TOWN LINE RD HAPLE plain NN SB3B9 OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SB 36-116-23 3A 6661 66636 ADDRESS DNASSICtKD KXP A NELSON RXP NELSON AB66 WATERTOWN RO NAPLE PLAIN NN B5SB6 OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 66 36-116-23 23 6666 66666 ADDRESS UNASSICNED RICHARD R RUOO ET AL RICHARD R RUDD 232B NAYZATA BLVD W P O BOX 76 LONB LAKE NN SBSBB 66 36-116-23 23 6666 66666 ADDRESS UNASSICNED BURLXNOTON northern INC TAXPAYER B N B SANTA FE RR CO MBHE/ADOR PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 6A1666 FORT WORTH TX 7*161 1 36 36-116-23 51 6066 66B7S WAYZATA BLVD W ROBB R RUDD ROBB R RUDD 6B7S WAYZATA BLVD W HAPLE PLAIN HH B5356 38 36-116-23 31 6665 66565 WAYZATA BLVD W GLENN A K JANE L SLAUGHTER GLENN A B JANE L SLAUGHTER 6565 WAYZATA BLVD NAPLE PLAIN NN 55356 38 36-118-23 32 6663 ■61166 TOWN LINE RO H OXESEN ET AL W/LIFE EST NARTNA E DXESEN 1166 TOWNLXNE RD HAPLE PLAIN NN 55356 38 36-116-23 32 6666 61666 TOWN LINE RD CBN KXCKHAFER CHARLES B HAXINE KXCKHAFER 1666 TOWN LINE RD HAPLE PLAIN »W 55356 36 36-118-23 33 6666 66766 CREEKWOOO TR RXCK V0CEL6ESAN6 RXCK VOCELCESANO 6766 CREEKWOOO TR NAPLE PLAIN NN 55356 38 36-118-23 33 6665 B6*86 CREEKWOOD TR J F B V N 0*NEXLL JANES F 0‘HEILL 6*86 CREEKWOOD TR NAPLE PLAIN HH 55356 38 36-116-23 62 6666 66636 ADDRESS UNASSICNED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY B N t SANTA FE RR CO PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 6*1686 FORT WORTH TX 7*1*1 86 36-118-23 21 6066 66686 ADDRESS UNASSICNED HENN CO PARK RES DIST HENN CO PARK RES DIST P 0 BOX 26* NAPLE PLAIN HN 55356 86 36-118-23 23 6605 00066 ADDRESS UNASSICNED CREAT NORTHERN RY B N B SANTA FE RR CO PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 6*1686 FORT WORTH TX 7*1*1 86 36-118-23 23 0008 66686 ADDRESS UNASSICNED 0 W KEARXN 8 H 6 KEARIN DAVID W KEARIN 1262 TOWNLXNE ROAD NAPLE PLAIN HN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 502 00016 a n. 1* . • ' I .. ^ •7 ;/' •• ) • * \ fj ■I ej •m - *••• - V KATRINAV^^^ 1 lake \— APIJ_ PLAIN MORRIS T BAKER PARK RESERVE SIT6 WOWTR PENDENCE 6 RR-1A CHIPC£WA UVNC Piacf BA y^iot NOPTVI I LR-1A RR-1B jKLSL branch ILC€N LAKE CLASSEN HIGH. LANC Cltristinc O'* c RQAO I ROAD STU08S Bi» t,. hy bV- ‘1 ■'.U u.- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I ^ mo C»Ty Or DATE: June 12, 2000^ ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Schedule Assessment Hearing for Fox Ridge Sanitary’ Sewer Project The bid opening for this project was held on June 6th. Four bids were received for this project. The Fox Ridge and East Long Lake projects were bid together. The lowest responsible bidder was Minneomm Utility Construction Inc., Mora Minnesota with a bid of $127,970 for the Fox Ridge portion of the project. A bid tabulation is attached for your information. Award of the contract will not be completed until after the assessment hearing. The proposed project assessment is $16,000 per unit. This assessment is based on nine units in the Fox Ridge MUSA expansion project area and two additional properties along South Brown Road. Only two of the ten South Brown road property owners were interested in participating in the project. The property owners can also request to receive a $5,000 allowance for the purchase and installation of their residential grinder pump station. This allowance will then be included in the project assessment resulting in a total assessment of $21,000. This is the maximum amount that can be assessed. After construction is complete, and final costs are known the actual assessment may be reduced, in a revised assessment roll, before submission to Hennepin County in December. This assessment roll lists an 8% interest rate, past practice has been to lower the interest rate dependant on the interest rate received on the project bonds. Eight percent is the maximum interest rate that can be charged. The actual interest rate on recently completed projects has been 6.25%. We are reconunending that the assessment hearing for this project be held at 7:00 p.m. during the regularly scheduled Council meeting on July 10th. If no assessment appeals are received, the contract could then be awarded on July 10th. We are recommending Council approval of the attached resolutions ordering the costs to be assessed and scheduling an assessment hearing for 7:00 p.m. on July 10th. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve resolution declaring cost to be assessed and ordering preparation of proposed assessment for the Fox Ridge Sanitary Sewer Project. Motion to approve resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for the Fox Sanitary Sewer Project. I---------- - — i, - .-F / I.' »I t i ‘ r. * < A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR FOX RIDGE AREA SANITARY SEWER WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the improvement of sanitary sewer in the Fox Ridge area and the estimated contract price for such improvement is $127,970 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $114,126 so that the total estimated cost of the improvement will be $242,430. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO, MINNESOTA: 1. 2. The total cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be $231,000. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3.The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the clerk ’s office for public inspection. 4.The Clerk shall upon completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof 2000. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held June 12, Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Assessmtlit Roll for Fox Ridge Area Sanitary Sewer Improvment Page 1 of 2 m-r:>* 08^hm-00 Mmicipality: ORONO Levy Nanbcr: Total Project Assessment: $225,( Municipal Code: 38 Project Number: 2000-2 Levy Description: Fox Ridge Area Sanitary Sewer Improvement Interest Rate: 8% Number of Years Payable: 15 PID8 Addition Total Code Principal Lot Block Name Street Property Address H Mailing Street Address Mailing City Address 34-118-23 34 0010 21,000.00 J & D ELLIS BROWN RD S 15 BROWN RDS LONG LAKE. MN 55356 03-117-23 24 0008 21,000.00 I I MARGARET COST BROWN RD S 255 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE, MN 55356 03-117-23 24 0009 21,000.00 2 I A&PKEARNEY 265 BROWN RD S 265 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE, MN 55356 34-11^23 34 0009 21,000.00 B & L MATIIISON BROWN RD S 5 BROWN RD S LONG LAKE, MN 55356 03-117-23 13 0008 42270 21,000.00 4 1 M C & L S HEADRICK 1850 FOX RIDGE RD 1850 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE. MN 55356 03-117-23 13 42270 21,000.00 3 1 TJ&M DAYTON 1895 FOX RIDGE RD 1895 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE, MN 55356 03-117-23 13 42270 21,000.00 5 I S M & E W POLANSKY 1900 FOX RIDGE RD 03-117-23 13 0006 42270 21,000.00 2 I D E & J M KIRKMAN 1945 FOX RIDGE RD 03-117-23 13 0010 42270 21,000.00' 6 1 DS& ED PHELPS 1950 FOX RIDGE RD 1900 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE, MN 55356 1945 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE. MN 55356 1950 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE. MN 55356 Total Principal includes a $5,000.00 Grinder Pump allowance 4*. Units I 'K*W« Addition Total Code Principal Lot Block Name Street Properly Address # Mailing Street Address Mailing City Address Units 03-117-23 13 0011 42270 21,000.00 7 LUCIA T MORISON 1960 FOX RIDGE RD 03-117-23 13 1960 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE. MN 55356 42270 21,000.00 I I R&BIIACK 1995 FOX RIDGE RD 1995 FOX RIDGE RD LONG LAKE, MN 55356 .--t- ' $231,000.00 If. 'n i Wm Total Principal includes a $5,000.00 Grinder Pump allowance • 4 • f. ir ; r>^ fcj * . Uh A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOX RIDGE AREA SANITARY SEWER WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on June 12,2000, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the Fox Ridge area sanitary sewer, and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in the Clerk's office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of July, 2000 in the Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the Coimty Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City, except that no interest may be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at anytime thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining impaid, with the interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held June 12th, 2000. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk 4 •r •., .TO i tv' iv'- r .1 4 5 ,4' * A a' m Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Bidders List Engineers & Architects UJSWHoyM t^MMS S5IIJ UIUMOO Bid Date and Time: Project Name: BRA File No.: Client: Client Project No.: For further information call: Jun 6 2000 02:00:00 PM East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer 139-99-105 City of Orono Engineer's Estimate: Thomas P Kellogg (651)604-4863 $216,000.00 i y, If* 'I ♦ bidder! isi2.xU ----------•.-n- • COliMr'ii meeting M I 2 2000REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CIIY ^ruHO/VO DATE: June 12, 2 ITEM NO.: / j ilili Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Schedule Assessment Hearing for East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer Project The bid opening for this project was held on June 6th. Four bids were received for this project. The Fox Ridge and East Long Lake projects were bid together. The lowest responsible bidder was Minncomm Utility Construction Inc., Mora Minnesota with a bid of $90,760 for the east Long Lake portion of the project. A bid tabulation and letter of recommendation, from the City Engineer, for a contract award to Minncomm Utility Construction Inc. is attached for your information. Award of the contract will not be completed until after the assessment hearing. The proposed project assessment is $12,700 per unit. This assessment is based on the project cost divided by eleven units. Only seven units will be included in the project assessment. Three properties have new conforming septic systems, and the owners have requested exclusion. The remaining unit, not assessed, is the Summit Beach Park property. The property owners can also request to receive a $5,000 allowance for the purchase and installation of their residential grinder pump station. This allowance will then be included in the project assessment resulting in a total assessment of $17,700. This is the maximum amount that can be assessed. After construction is complete, and final costs are known the actual assessment may be reduced, in a revised assessment roll, before submission to Hennepin County in December. This assessment roll lists an 8% interest rate, past practice has been to lower the interest rate dependant on the interest rate received on the project bonds. Eight percent is the maximum interest rate that can be charged. The actual interest rate on recently completed projects has been 6.25%. We are recommending that the assessment hearing for this project be held at 7:00 p.m. during the regularly scheduled Council meeting on July 10th. If no assessment appeals are received, the contract could then be awarded on July 10th. We are recommending Council approval of the attached resolutions ordering the costs to be assessed and scheduling an assessment hearing for 7:00 p.m. on July 10th. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve resolution declaring cost to be assessed and ordering preparation of proposed assessment for the East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer Project. Motion to approve resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for the East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer Project. f. {■ A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR EAST LONG LAKE AREA SANITARY SEWER WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the improvement of sanitary sewer in the East Long Lake area and the estimated contract price for such improvement is $90,760 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to S103,847 so that the total estimated cost of the improvement will be $194,607, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO, MINNESOTA; 1. 2. The total cost to be assessed against bene fitted property owners is declared to be $123,900. Assessments shall be payable in eq»ial annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3.The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the clerk's office for public inspection. 4.The Clerk shall upon completion of such propose.* i.ssessment, notify the Council thereof. A Jopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held June 12, 2000 Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Assessment Roll for East Long Lake Area Sanitary Sewer Improvement 07-JuthOO Maakipality: ORONO Levy Number: Total Project Assessment: $123,900.00 Municipal Code: 38 Project Number: 2000*3 Levy Description: East Long Lake Area Sanitary Sewer Project Interest Rate: 8% Number ol Years Payable: 15 - ^ '2^H 35-118-23 42 0001 41335 $17,700.00 NANCY TEMPLE SAMUELS 1005 OLD LONG LAKE RD 1005 OLD LONG LAKE RD ORONO, MN 55391 123,900.00 Total Principal includes a $5,000.00 Grinder Pump allowance PID#Addition Code Total Lot Block Principal Name Street ft Property Address Mailing Street Address Mailing City Address UniU 35-118-23 13 0003 41335 $17,700.00 R & S JOHNSON 1000 OLD LONG LAKE RD 1000 OLD LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 1 35-118-23 140003 41335 $17,700.00 J BEAUCHAINE 460 LONG LAKE RD E 460 LONG LAKE RD E WAYZATA, MN 55391 I 35-118-23 140004 41335 $17,700.00 BETTY HAMMAN 450 E LONG LAKE RD 450 E LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 1 35-118-23 14 0005 41335 $17,700.00 LOIS STURMAN 430 E LONG LAKE RD 430 E LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 1 35-118-23 41 0002 41335 $17,700.00 RICHARD RINEHART 985 OLD LONG LAKE RD 985 OLD LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 I 35-118-23 41 0005 41335 $17,700.00 DARRELL ANDERSON 925 OLD LONG I.AKE RD 920 W WAYZATA BLVD WAYZATA, MN 55391 1 1 K r- ^ i • fco" h' •: MC£J||S]Q REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ 2 2000 DATE; June^2, ITEM NO./3 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer’s Report Item Description: Approve Purchase of Public Works Trucks The 2000 Capital Outlay budget included $43,000 for the replacement of an existing 1 ton plow truck, and $29,000 for the replacement of a 3/4 ton plow truck These trucks are 1986 and 1984 models with approximately 120,000 miles, are in poor condition, and will be sold at the County auction. These trucks are bought through the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Program. 1 Ton Plow Truck Truck, Grossman Chevrolet, Burnsville MN $24,502 6.5% MN Sales Tax Paid At Time of Licensing $1,593 License $29 *J-Craft, Truck Box $9,880 ♦Sander & Snow Plow Equipment $5,120 ♦Radio, Strobe Lights, & Safety Equipment $1,000 ♦Rust Proofing $550 Total Cost $42,674 3/4 Ton Plow Truck Truck, Grossman Chevrolet, Burnsville MN $20,326 6.5% MN Sales Tax Paid At Time of Licensing $1,321 License $29 ♦Tool Box and Snow Plow Equipment $5,187 ♦Radio, Strobe & Work Lights $1,050 ♦Rust Proofing $550 Total Cost $28,463 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approve purchase of Public Works replacement 1 Ton Plow Truck from Grossman Che\Tolet with accessories at a total cost of $42,674 to be funded from the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund budget. Approve purchase of Public Works replacement 3/4 Ton Plow Truck from Grossman Chevrolet with accessories at a total cost of $28,463 to be funded from the Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund budget. *• : *. * s. - K * REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COlih>r^n mceti NQ M 1 2 2000 Cli Y DATE: June 12, 2 iiiii ITEM NO./"/ Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Safe Assure Cooperative Safety Training In 1998, the fourteen Lake Minnetonka Area Cooperating Cities (LMACC) started a cooperative safety training program using SafeAssure consultants to provide safety training, safety policy manuals, and other required documentation. This program has been very successful and the Cities have been satisfied with the services provided and have decided to renew their contracts with SafeAssure for another year. We are recommending Council approval of the SafeAssure proposal for another year at a cost of $3,110. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of the proposal from Safe Assure Consultants for conducting safety training and preparation of the related written programs and documentation at an annual cost of $3,110. r -jT*- IT fi f - ♦' \l\j t \\/ \J OKOirt," Public WoHes 1I ■&W: SflfcAssucre Cokvsudtflktts, ■i Mfly 2000 I- i;’’ ' According to the United States Department of Labor, Division of Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Minnesota Department of Labor, Division of Occupational Safety and Health Administration employers must have documented proof of employee training and written procedures for certain standards/Stamtes (the attached addendum and training schedule clarifies written and training requirements). The applicable standards required for The City of Orono Public Works are listed below. A.W.A.I.R.MN STATUTE 182.653 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN 29 CFR 1910.35 THRU .38 CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY-29 CFR 1910.147 & MN Statute 5207.0600 HAZARD COMMUNICATIONS 29 CFR 1910.1200 & MN Stamte 5206.0100 thru 5206.1200 CONFINED SPACE 29 CFR 1910.146 RESPIRATORY PROTECTION 29 CFR 1910.134 OCCUPATIONAL NOISE EXPOSURE 29 CFR 1910.95 BLOODBORNE PATHOGENS 29 CFR 1910.1030 SIGNS, SIGNALS. AND BARACADES 1926 Subpart G MOTOR VEHICLES / BACKHOE 19? ^ Subpart O i TRENCHING (Competent Person)1‘1.;6.-V ‘ 0 thru 1926.652 Below is a list of additional subparts covered through assessments, inspections, etc. i*-.: I - Vi i -;;i Recordkeeping General Duty Clause General Safety and Health Provisions Occupational Health and Environmental Controls Fire Protection and Prevention Materials Handling, Storage, Use, and Disposal Hand and Power Tools - Welding and Cutting Electrical Scaffolds Fall Protection Power Transmission and Distribution Rollover Protective Structures; Overhead Protection Ladders Toxic and Hazardous Substances Walking-Working Surfaces Occupational Health and Environmental Control Hazardous Materials General Environmental Controls Fire Protection Compressed Gas and Compressed Air Equipment Materials Handling and Storage Machinery and Machine Guarding Hand and Portable Powered Tools and Other- Hand-H Equipment Electrical Toxic and Hazardous Substances Employee Right To Know General Industries Construction 29 CFR 1904 PL91-596 29 CFR 1926 Subpart C - 29 CFR 1926 Subpart D - 29 CFR 1926 Subpart F - 29 CFR 1926 Subpart H - 29 CFR 1926 Subpart I - 29 CFR 1926 Subpart J - 29 CFR 1926 Subpart K - 29 CFR 1926 Subpart L - 29 CFR 1926 Subpart M 29 CFR 1926 Subpart V - 29 CFR 1926 Subpart W 29 CFR 1926 Subpart X - 29 CFR 1926 Subpart Z - 29 CFR 1910 Subpart D - 29 CFR 1910 Subpart G - 29 CFR 1910 Subpart H • 29 CFR 1910 Subpart J - 29 CFR 1910 Subpart L - 29 CFR 1910 Subpart M 29 CFR 1910 Subpart N ■ 29 CFR 1910 Subpart O ■ 29 CFR 1910 Subpart P - 29 CFR 1910 Subpart S - 29 CFR 1910 Subpart Z - MN Chapter 5206 MN Chapter 5205 MN Chapter 5207 All training done by SafeAssure Consultant, Inc. on SafeAssure Consultant, Inc. written programs will meet or exceed all State and/or Federal OSH A requirements. .L -I1.1^. t' All documents and classroom training sessions produced by SafeAssure Consultants for The City of Orono Public Wor>.:s are for the sole and express use of The City of Orono Public Works and its employees and are not to be shared, copied, or used hy any division, department, subsidiary, or parent organization, or any entity whatsoever without prior written approval of SafeAssure Consultants. It is always the practice of SafeAssure Consultants to make modifications and/or additions to your program when necessary to comply with changing OSHA standards/statutes. Changes and/or additions, when made during a contract year, will be made at no additional cost to The City of Orono Public Works. SafeAssure consultants does not take responsibility for financial loss due to OSHA Hues or any other factors within The City of Orono Public Works. A tentative training schedule (attached) will be implemented with times and dates convenient to most employees. These programs/policies and procedures listed on the addendum do not include the cost of additional equipment, signs, labels, etc. required to meet applicable Standards/Statutes. J ADDENDUM SAFETY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS The City of Orono Public Works Programs & Training A.W.A.I.R. (A Workplace Accident and Injury Reduction Act) •Maintain site specific program Employee Right to Know/Hazard Communication • maintain site specific program • documented training of all personnel (general and specific training) • various labeling requirements • maintain hazardous substance list • maintain MSDS manual Confined Space • maintain site specific program • documented training of all personal Lock Out/Tag Out (Control of Hazardous Energy) • maintain site specific program • documented training of all personnel (including "hands on") Emergency Action Plan • maintain site specific program • documented training of all personnel . 1 Bloodborne Pathogens • maintain site specific program • documented training of all response personnel f f /: rw 4 ‘ fi Hearing Conservation (Occupational Noise Exposure) • maintain site specific program • documented training of all personnel Cranes-Chains-Slings • maintain site specific program • documented training of all personnel (inspections) Personal Protective Equipment • documented training of all personnel • maintain site specific program Motor Vehicles/Backhoes • documented training of all personnel • maintain site specific program General Safety Requirements • maintain site specific program • documented training of all personnel Respiratory Protection • maintain site specific program • documented training of all personnel Trenching & Excavation (competent person) • maintain site specific program • documented training of all personnel .^1-:> ^ ? I A r -.’V '•^S- >-' ft- , i . ^W' ■if^.------------ COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Discus/ Approve motion to accept quotation for Navarre Municipal Parking Lot Lighting Improvements from NSP Outdoor Lighting in the amount of $32,460. Discuss/ Approve motion to complete the appropriate budget adjustments to fund the Navarre Parking Lot Lighting Lnpu' ements from the Undesignated Component of the PIR Fund. hN * • . • -I :• » A J : 953-7 S' oCB 5|-\^p bc^so (»f -----£U<- 961 X K\NV/\W7.? KMiPVUKUF ./ P« ?.0 ISX 960.7 m NKVKRRg {M$T U6HT , X 96L..2 Hoy 9um pm i/ATf ) CP. RP liX 960-7 L16IAT , X 961.2 V11. -- 5 100' NKVA.B.RE P/VRV:iM-G LOT A . i ^ ■ i||-, Shoebox iSfT 4 ^ biimk NSP Outdoor Lighting is Luminaires - Classic .••••• t Shoebox - Step to Precision-A The Shoebox moves you in the right direction using precision illumination giving a pleasing look and feel for ar.y outdoor setting. ... . Shoebox Deep Hatbox Hatbox - Unique Impression The Hatbox compliments any environment with a unique touch and clarity that provides performance lighting and gives your community the right impression. I Re( Rectilinear Rectilinear - Straight to the Light The Rectilinear has a strai look to your community. Cobrahead Cobrahead - Customary Concept The Cobrahead is appredated for function and form that contributes to the safety and security of well-lit streets that is customaiy for your residents and business patrons. Cobrahead Cutoff Cobrahead Cutoff - Quality Statement The Cobrahead Cutoff provides illumination that will send a quality statement to any environment by redudng glare and improving lighting levels. Custom Options Improve the safety and security of your community with a custom design using decorative or classic products that provide the proper lighting levels and deliver a comfortable illumination. V/hether you want nostalgic, traditional, classic or standard we c?n help create that certain look and feel for all your residential and commerdal areas. NlrAllftt MjII MinfiAAfinllt. MN a • 1.8nO.Qfia.823S A ei999 Narthaffl Stacts Powtr Company , « mmmim ”'•5 •#. 00 *00 *o« *00 00 *00 *00 bo bo b^ bo bo bo oo *oo bo bo bo bo bo bo bo bo bo bo bo bo *oo bo bo *00 ‘no *0A *oj *0A bo bo bo bo bo *oo *oo ^ bo *oo bo *oo bo bo bo bo *04J bo bo bo bo bo bo bo -00 *00 '00 \)0 Vo -00 -00 Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo 'oo oo 'oo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vi Vi Vi Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo 'oo 'oo Vo Vo 'oo V. V. 'o.i Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi V. Vi Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo 00 Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo 'oo Vo V.i Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi 'o.i Vi Vi Vi Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vo Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi 'oi Vi Vi V.i Vi 'o.i Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vj^oj Vo Vo Vi Vi Vi Vi -01 Vi Vi Vi Vi -01 Vi V.i Vi 'oo^V»>>-Vr5TV7-Vi-V»-Viju4>7'o^^ Vo Vo Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi 01 '01 Vi -01 V,Ji<TiVV*jL.Jo^Ju-ao-'oo><^Vv-o^Ju:J^^ i^a-b^*V. *02 *02 *01 *01 bi *oi *o.i bo bo0.2S- 0 2 01 *0 3 Vjft4,b.i. ............................................ V. V* V ftft'’ir5“>rS^b 4 07 'O^ 'l.l 'l.4 *13 'l.2 ’1.2bt 0.1 0.1 Vi *0i-bi'b2^}i2Jbrbrb^jij?^0.3 02 4 0’0 2 OJ l5rf2''b.l O.I 0.1 00 0.1 •.* ~ ^------:—rC* Vo Vi * 04 Vrji^orv^'v 1/0«/« *» Vo Vo V i V i V i V i V i V? VV 'i/vi *4* Vi Vi Vi ** V iY i.t *io ’ii *i» ‘'Yio *4« V t 'ii V t •a? 01 V i v A'u^o V» V:^'js 'ji W'i.» N.i Vo Vo Vo Vi Vi Vi vrTjno-ro-i.1 -loWi OI V i v Ao V'ii '»s Vi '.i ViTvo Vi \TV<u.'io 'n 'io *i.» Vo Vo Vo V i V i Vo Vo V i Vo Vo Vo V i V i *0.1 Vt V/^Vt bj/Vo V t Vo Vo Vo Vo V i V i Vo^Vo W^oo^*i.i *i 4 *1.4 1.1 ’10 '1.1 Voy^'io V/TTTt 10 JK4 Vo>rtl.1 >4 to Vo V4 ’3.1 ’3 4 »t O tvVl bV^bt *0 2 0.1 O Propojc^ «-isKV flarvo!c!.-4| Vo Vo Vo 0^ ^ ^ 0 0 bo 0 0 0 4W 4 03 vl01 0 7tVi\0S 0 4<v. O 01 *0 7 b7 *0JyV5 ’0 4 0 3 __ ^bi bo^vrbr^O*Ao ^0 04 0 I Vo Vo Vt V i V i I Vo Vo V i V i VyVo » Vo Vo V i V i « VofVt V/ V^'io *i Vo Y *o/oTlrKb» jo 0 ^Jas-A^s b^ci os 0 4 b4 ’0 4 *0p S 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 1 s b4^'‘irbi *0 ’ I V« Vki V.1 V.1 1 1 Vi I Vt Vi Vi Vi > s v.< I V« Vi Vi Vi y v< 1 V« Vi Vi Vt «}*Vt I Vo V i V i Vt bW Vt I Vo V i V i V i Vo Vt I Vo Vo V i V i vAbt • Vo Vo V i Vt Vt\it • Vo Vo V i V i Vt 0 Vo Vo V i V i V i "Aa v\ V^i.^s^^o ’47 W 0 Vo Vo V i V i Vi 0 Vo Vo Vo V i V i V i Vo Vo Vo V i V i V i V jS j VrSV-Vs Vi bo To *1.1 bt *07 *0 7 *07 bi >4b4 04 03 03 V )iWvci^5 0 *07 bi *0.7 *oV l *1 3 *10 *1 • *rrrt *15^'^ bf *07 *0i *0i 0.7 Oi Oi Ot Oi r*\ \ 10 Vs b 2 *4.1 *4.3 Vo V3 *4 3 *4 3 *4 4 *4S Vi V t Vo V 20 ^ *IO *IO *14 *17 *1.1 *11 *12 *13 *14 '13 '1.1 T V? V4 *2 4^0 *1.7 *1.S *12 *12 *1.1 *17 *1 4 *1 S *1 ijl Vi Vi Jilt Vi *2/ *17 *1.4 *13 *13 *13 *1.^I.» *-« «.«• . . X . X • • VCllV.. V. V> •.» Vi )fv,A<iiJUlJ4^4 •« ',4 ^ b. V, -3. -33 -3T b4 '» 30 b. '3. b.T 3. bt 3^. 4>.0 10<^ It . X . . A- ^ ^ • % ft *1 ft bo 4 O^Ia.1 V t 4 i 30 I S/Ot ot ^ 1.1 To .. ■'* '** V4 -ITvrTrrTrvi 12 'iTYs-bt^'o* 'ot 'o» 'Mjft 'w >Tvrvrb7brvr»3>.i«'"rrVr?rYrTrTr-V»-4.^^ '•* " bo bo 00 00 b I *00 *0 0 *00 Vi *0.1 *0 0 bo *00 bo *02 *01 *0.1 *00 *0 0 *0 0 Vo 5)2 *02 bi *0 1 *0 1 *00 bo *03 *02 b.1 *01 *01 *0.1 *00 *00 *00 bo 03^7 H.l w.i V » -• bo bo V4^s*02 *01 Vi V i V o bo bo s ob *02 *01 V i V i bo be bVo2 *0.1 V i V i *oo bo # W# ----------------- V *02 b.1 *01 *01 *0.1 *00 *00 *00 A7 *02 *01 *01 *01 bi *00 bo b jK^3\t^2 *0.1 *0.1 *01 *0.1 bo b I *i0 tijM^*t3 Vo » *i3 *i.:^p*tt Vo 7 Vs *2S *34 Vo *4.1 3 *i3 *23 *27 *3.7 vi 3 *3.1 *?2 V4 Vj *43 Vo *M Vt\Sp Vf Vo *12 *lWt Vi Vt V3 *34 Vi V>7 1^14^ 4 3 4t 4 1 3 0 3ft SO « W/'si '3.7 . . . . ’l J '1J 2 0 Y7 *1^ \___________ *13 *17 *17 *17 'l i^l i V4juJl7-5?^^ Oi Ot bi *0i bi jT. *0f b7 b< Vt *4i vy *isAot bi ’U> 'i.i Vi Vs V3 *i/*ot *ci *oiVio * ____ V o *0 7 *0 6 *0 7 \ o *{• *1 1 *07jbS'Vs *oi }jJU.^'*^w30S *04 *04 0 4 Ib2 '01 *o^*oT^o bo ’0 4 ®* *®* ** ^qi3 *01 *01 *00 bp'bo ' 3 *01 *01^*00 *00 *00 OS *0 4 0 4 0.4 04».i i.r^ftTbi bi V7 '0 7 o.t 07^ ‘bi Vi *0 7 '02^04^*0<‘*0^*04 *0 4 '01 *0 4 *0 4 *0 4 *0^07 .03-03 *03 0 3 ;oVb4 0 3/03 b 00^^ 3 0 1 O^*i0 *00 i 12 oToi b.1 *0.0 bo fo^t.i Vi bi *00 bo *07 *^*01 Vi *00 *00 it bo bo bo b 1 bo bo bo ;^4 V2 V»J -03 •o»’'o7TrT» 0* l»j’'c3 -01 V« 'ot -OI 'o I 01 01 01 0.foV'\M 01 01 u. orH^^®4 V4 01 0. 0.1 -0, 0, '0. 01 -o, 0. 01 -ai oi 'ai 'o. o. 'o. Vi Vm Vi oi oi Vi 'oi Vi 'oi 'o, Vi oi .3 «Ni..o. :::: ••• " '• t: V. “ •:: •“ »• - '• - ■*' ?■ - ?• '• :•• - ••::; WU V. V. tl V. JVi> ■"• ■" “ “ ■" ■“ '*• " " • ’ ■" ■' • ”■ •-■ 13 *02 0 1 *0 1 *01 *01 bi 00 *00 *00 bo 00 12 *01 *01 *0 1 *0 1 *00 *00 *00 *00 bo bo 1.1 *0.1 *01 *00 *00 *00 *00 *00 bo Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi V7 ’02 01 Ai 0.1 01 0.1 00 oo ou u. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -M Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi -01 -01 '.7 'OJ Vi ^1 Vi -00 -00 oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo 00 V. V. V. Vi Vi Vi V. Vi -0, Vi Vi Vi '.0 Vo 'oo 'oo 'oo 'oo oo 'oo oo .0 00 00 00 00 00 00 .0 ^ bt *00 *00 *00 bo *01 Vi *00 *00 bo bo bo *00...................^J^SOW flPS /srtf- bo *00 bi bo oi» bo 00 00 00 00 ®® ^ ^1 / Vo bo *00 *00 *00 bo bo b3 ^ I Plan View ^ r^tnertff Ipf' e^hnJr SCftIft l*«40* /* -f /i STATISTICS Ciiii of Otor\(^ • /cf DotcrIpHon ___________r"A»r\ Moo M«» MO./M0* AvoAKn Cole 7one I4 0«(cj 72te 20tc N/A N/A . t- -rm '■t:' If Ik'- ,./ REQUEST FOR COUNCE. ACTION ’'^^ETINQ JUI^ / 2 21 DATE: June 12. 2000 I ’j pnnn DATE: Juig|^12. 2000 ITEM NO.: /(o Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report " r 1 Item Description: Request for Payment #3/Final, Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Project We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Final Payment, Edgewood Hills Sanitary Sewer Project to GL Contracting toe. in the amount of $9,407.72 I i V.ai> ft . liaa^rir r. » I Aftakaatr/.i. - u : :' -'V V-.; ” :,’• : r.- fV Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Inalwfi 4 A«mr>ct» Owner City of Orono 2750 Kellv Pk'/v'/Crvstal Bay, MN. 55323-0066 Date: June1,20CC For Period:10/6/99 to 5/31/00 Request No: 3-"inal Contractor G L Contractinq Inc 43C0 Willow DrMedina. MN, 55340 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT EDGEWOOD HIL'.S SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS BRA FILE NO. 139-98-099 SUMMARY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Original Contract Amount Change Order - Addition Change Order • Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Material on Hand Amount Earned Less Retainage OVo Subtotal Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FO;. PAYMENT NO. $ $94,341.90 3/Final 5 S $ $ S s $ s Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Approved by Contractor. G L CONTRACTING INC Approved by Owner; CITY OF ORONO Specified Contract Completion Date: September 3,1999 Date: 252.962 CO 158.620.10 153.493 49 0,00 153.493.49 0 00 153,498.49 144.090.77 9.407 72 ■i Item Chanae Order Number 1 i , . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 Part 1 • Sanitary Sewer 8 ’ PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35. 0'-8’ deep Connect 8" PVC to existing manhole 4' diameter sanitary MH, 8' deep, incl R*1642*B cstg Directional bore 8" HDPE SDR 11 Directional bore 4" HDPE SDR 11 service pipe 4" PVC cleanout 8" X 4" PVC service wye branch Furnish 8" x 4" PVC wye, cut into ex. 8‘ 4" PVC service pipe in place, SDR 26 Mechanical trench compaction Insulation Sanitary sewer television inspection Connect 4" PVC to existing home Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer PVC Part 2 • Restoration Clear and Grub Sod with 4" topscil Seed with topsoil, mulch and fertilizer Erosion control fence Furnish and plant Evergreen Tree (Blue Spruce) 6' high Furnish and plant shade tree (Sugar Maple) 4" diameter Remove and transplant bushes Remove and transplant tree • Deciduous Remove and transplant tree • Coniferous Total Part 2 • Restoration Change Order No. 1 Total Part 1 • Sanitary Sewer Total Part 2 - Restoration Total Work Completed To Date Contract Unit Quantity Amount Jnit Quantihy Price to Date to Date LF 1030 322 1073 S34.550.60 EA 1 2436 8 1 S2.436 60 EA 7 1779.7 7 $12,457.90 LF 60 74.8 60 $4,488.00 LF 585 48.3 780 $37,674.00 EA 7 281.1 10 $2,811.00 EA 6 40.5 6 $24300 EA 3 1703.3 3 $5,109 90 LF 550 19 458 $8,702.00 LF • 1580 093 1531 $1,500.38 SY 100 9.6 64 $614.40 LF 1030 16 1140 $1,824.00 EA 8 2545.3 10 $25.45300 $137,924.98 LS 1 3786 1.26 $4,770.36 SY 2000 36 750 $2,700.90 AC 1 5244 5 1.3 SG.817.05 LF 1050 1.8 585 $1,053.00 EA 20 345 9 $000 EA 10 345.9 $0.00 EA 10 232.3 1 $232.30 EA 10 232.3 $0.00 EA 10 232.3 $0.00 $15,573.51 $137,924.98 $15,573.51 $153,498.49 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF ORONO BRA FILE NO 139-98-099 CONTRACTOR G L CONTRACTING INC CHANGE ORDERS 1 6/8/99 Revised sewer alliqnment based on a value engineered design -594.341 90 Total Change Orders ($94,341 90) PAYMENT SUMMARY 1 07/01/99 08/03/99 127.179.48 6.69366 133.873 14 2 08/03/99 10/05/99 16.911.29 7.583 72 151.674.49 3 10/06/99 05/31/00 9.407.72 153.498 49 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 « -i V Material on Hand Total Payment to Date_________$153,498.49 Original Contract $252,962.00 Retalnage Pay No. 3/Final Change Orders -$94,341.90 Total Amount Earned $153,498.49 Revised Contract $158,620.10 r • [ F::r 1- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUW^" JUN 1 2 2000 C\TY Oh O h ONQ DATE: June 5,2000 nITEM NO: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse A- H City Administrator ’s Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Selection of Police ^ief Search Consultant The Council has reviewed several search consultant proposals and will interview Personnel Decisions International (PDI) prior to the June 12 Council meeting. If the Council is confident in the ability of PDI to conduct an effective search process, Council may want to direct the City Administrator to finalize an agreement with PDI, and authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to sign the agreement. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion regarding finalizing an agreement with PDI regarding a Police Chief search process, and authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to sign the agreement. ..-;T J if •’i t-te. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CO(.«,^„ M5ETINQ JUN I 2 2000 ^"’''runOUQ DATE: June 7,2000 ITEM NO: / J) Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Minnesota Board of Government innovation and Cooperation Grant Application In addition to its responsibility for reviewing and approving the Long Lake/Orono plan for cooperation and consolidation, the Minnesota Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation (BGIC) also is responsible for authorizing tlie disbursement of grant funds to assist cities in the process of implementing a plan for consolidation. The Cities of Orono and Long Lake are eligible for consolidation grant frmds of up to $100,000 per year for four years. To be eligible for this funding in 2001, a grant application must be submitted to, and approved by, the BGIC by June 30,2000. The grant application, and a resolution authorizing the submittal of the application, is attached. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution authorizing the submittal of a consolidation grant application to the Minnesota Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation. *1 t tT ■> V t ^ V < t * U h‘ h ■,.vi *( hfe uni'::i .4K4 »♦ I. 01 V‘ ’•> ' .^V^-..iV-I << r i A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A CONSOLIDATION IMPLEMENTATION GRANT APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, as follows; Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01. In the summer of 1999, the City Councils of the Cities of Orono and Long Lake created the Long Lake - Orono Consolidation Study Committee to examine whether the two cities should merge. 1.02.On May 25, 2000, the committee adopted its findings and recommendations in favor of merger. These were amended by the committee on June 1, 2000. The findings and recommendations constitute a plan for cooperation and combination under Minn. Stat. Sec. 465.82. 1.03. On June 5,2000, the City Councils of both Orono and Long Lake voted to adopt a resolution adopting the recommended plan for cooperation and combination. 1.04 The Cities of Orono and Long Lake are eligible for a consolidation implementation grant in the amount of up to $100,000 per year for four years through the Minnesota Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation. 1.05 A grant application has been prepared for submittal to the BGIC. Section 2. COUNCIL ACTION. 2.01. The City Council authorizes the submittal of the consolidation implementation grant application to the BGIC. Page 1 of2 !.? 4- 2.02. The City Council directs the City Clerk to send certified copies of this resolution to the Minnesota Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held June 12,2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 2 of 2 <1.- r l;rf V: r w REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CO»»M^„ meeting JUN 1 2 2000 Cl I » v^r \Jt10NQ DATE: June 8,2000 ITEM NO: I ^ Department Approval: Name Lin Vee ')T Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Title City Clerl Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval RESIDENTIAL KENNEL LICENSE 1.Melissa Wendell 1151 North Arm Drive COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. 4 i i- ■-i:, t. i ^ jk'i •:>■ KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1, 200 to December 31, 200 Owner: WerTlrll Property Address: lOl u. Arm onvC', HaifTl HM (iaclude city and zip) Mailing Address (if different):_____________________________________ Phone: (home) fcrz/^n7.-4g0________ RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:_3 (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: *^ChnO[)Z.€/*5__________ (work) 6)'2/zin-~n6i6 Purpose for more than 2 dogs: Dogs normally kept: X inside ____kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigned hereby grants the City permission to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. rAu?//nm CO.3/36/00 Applicant Date For Cir/ Use Only Kennel inspected by ... , ^rr ,r r Recommends: Approval Dem^ 8 Jun 2000 Mon 8:25 AH Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 61003 61003 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 05-Jun-00 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH Totals Check Number 61003 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH Check Number 61004 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN 61004 05-Jun-00 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN Totals Check Number 61004 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN Check Number 61005 SOLOMON SMITH BARNEY 61005 05-Jun-00 SOLOMON SMITH BARNEY Totals Check Number 61005 SOLOMON SMITH BARNEY Check Number 61006 ROCKVAM BOAT YARDS INC. 61006 OS-Jun-00 ROCKVAM BOAT YARDS INC Totals Check Number 61006 ROCKVAM BOAT YARDS INC Check Number 61339 MCLEODUSA INC 61339 61339 :5-Jun-00 C5-Jun-00 MCLEODUSA INC MCLEODUSA INC I Totals Check Number 61339 MCLEODUSA INC Check Number 61478 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 61478 05-Jun-00 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 61478 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Check Nubber 61479 STATE OF MINNESOTA 61479 05-Jun-00 STATE OF MINNESOTA Totals Check Number 61479 STATE OF MINNESOTA Check Number 61480 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN 61480 05-Jun-00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN i-Totals Check Number 61480 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN —Ml.I v'liir Transaction Amount 500.00 500.00 130.00 130.00 55.92 55.92 137.39 137.39 170.00 182.00 -352.00 950.00 950.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 COUMnii JUN 1 ^ 2000 Comments CITY Oh Ono/VO CASH FOR NARCOTICS BUY MBRSHP-KUEHN 6/1-5/31/01 INTEREST EXPENSE PONTOON RENTAL-SHRLNE INS VOID CK 61339 VOID CK 61339 POSTAGE-CONS NFrfSLTR-S/OO LICENSE TO CROSS-APPLIC FOX RIDGE SEWER PERMIT 1 I J^U, , it .!■' I-A'liltl- S Jun 2000 Hon 6t25 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Check Number Date % ■ Name Transaction Amount Comments Check Number Orand Total 61480 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN 1,511.31 Iv r ■ t I S Jun 2000 Non 8tl7 AM Page 1 City of Orono Payment Tranaaction Listing Batch HC052000 Contains 9 Entries Actual Dollars Entered are 1.511.31 User Dollar Control of 1.511.31 Posting Accounts; Cash Account 10100 Payables Account 20200 Batch is In Balance 0.00 Entry Vendor Xrryoice Pinal P.O. Pay Date A/P Account Number Amount Due Date Check ff Check Date 1 01304 170526 CASH 10100 N 05-Jun-00 N PAYABLES 20200 B 10142110403 2 01304 3369224 GASH 10100 M OS-Jun-00 N B 61349830340 PAYABLES 20200 3 00044 PD CVSH 10100 N 05-Jun-00 N G 10119999 PAYABLES 20200 4 00102 KUBKN CASH 10100 N 05-Jun-00 N E 10141500433 PAYABLES 20200 5 01368 INTEREST CASH 10100 N 05-Jun-00 N PAYABLES 20200 E 10141500489 6 00509 5/23/00 CASH 10100 N 05-Jun-00 N PAYABLES 20200 B 10142400415 7 00578 144-6 CASH 10100 N 05-Jun-00 N B 40648720591 PAYABLES 20200 8 00191 NSLTR 5/00 CASH 10100 N 05-JUn-00 N PAYABLES 20200 E 10143290800 9 00677 PERMIT CASH 10100 K 05-Jun-00 R PAYABLES 20200 E 40648720591 Total Total System Generated Qiecks Hand Payable Checks 0.00 1511.31 Total - Combined 1511.31 — -170.OC COmERTS VOID CK 61339 061339 08-May-00 -182.00 COmSNTS VOID CK 61339 061339 08-May>00 500.00 COieffiNTS CASH FOR NARCOTICS BUY 061003 19-May-OO 130.00 COMMENTS MBRSHP-KUEHN 6/1-5/31/01 061004 23-May-OO 55.92 COmSSTS INTEREST EXPENSE 061005 23-May-OO 137.39 061006 23-May-OO COMMENTS PONTOON RENTAL-SHRLNE INS 40.00 061479 25-May-OO COMMENTS LICENSE TO CROSS-APPLIC 950.00 061478 24-May-OO COMMOrrS postage-cons NENSLTR-5/OO 50.00 061480 25-May-OO COmERTS FOX RIDGE SEVER PERMIT rite Pay Pariod 11 11 11 11 11 11.1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 CITY OF ORONO Check Register Check # Employe# Nama Check Oat# 047630 JOHNSON. MARY ANN 047631 BERRY. HEIDI N. 047632 HASEMAN. CAROLE A. 047633 MOORSE. RONALD J. 047629 VOID 047686 TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F. 047634 VEE. LINDA S. 047635 KUEHN. THOMAS M. 047636 OLSON, RONALD J. 047637 PETTIT. SANDRA K. 047638 ANDERSON, BRUCE L 047639 BOBZIEN, SUE A. 047640 BUDIO, STACIE M. 047641 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. 047642 CHESWICK. GARY B. 047643 CORNICK, JAMES L. 047644 DEMOOUSKI, JAY C. 047645 ERICKSON. KURT R 047646 FARNIOK. CORREY L 5/31/00 5/31/00 5/31/00 5/31/00 5/31/00 sni/oo 5/31/00 5^1/00 5/31/00 5/31/00 5/31/00 5^1/00 501/00 5/31/00 501/00 501/00 501/00 5/31/00 5/31/00 Check Amount $590.40 $667.17 $700.01 $1,724.40 $0.00 $479.38 $1,149.12 $1.44884 $210.81 $304.36 $1,268.05 $782.69 $726.45 $869.64 $1,538.84 $1,532.87 $1,268.21 $1,447.54 $1,721.63 11 047647 FISCHENICH, DAN T.5/31/00 $1,265.83 11 047648 FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K.5/31/00 $1,188.39 11 047649 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P.5^1/00 $1,858.08 11 047650 JOHNSON, JEFFREY 5/31/00 $811.53 11 047651 MADSON, ADRIENNE M.5^1/00 $471.14 11 047652 MCNALLY, STEVEN A.5/31/00 $1,814.14 11 047653 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L 5/31/00 $825.34 11 047654 MOROWCZYNSKI, JAMES 5/31/00 $1,979.07 11 047655 PERSELL, WILLIAM R.5/31/00 $429.63 11 047656 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B.6/31/00 $1,309.39 11 047657 TOMCZYK, MARK W.5/31/00 $1,445.35 11 047658 WITTKE, ANTHONY A.sni/oo $855.65 11 047659 HENDRICKS, RONALD J.sni/oo $614.37 11 047660 BOTTENBERG. WENDY C.snvoQ $925.78 11 047661 DAVIS. MARK L.5/31/00 $1,051.07 11 047662 GAFFRON, MICHAEL P.5/31/00 $1,186.22 11 047663 GAPPA, GREGORY A.sni/oo $1,775.46 11 047664 MEYER. WILLIAM C.5/31/00 $518.71 11 047665 OMAN. LYLE E.5/31/00 $46.22 11 047666 PENCE. CHRISTOPHER M.6/31/00 $925.78 11 047667 WEINBERGER, PAUL E.5/31/00 $1,178.79 11 047668 BRINKHAUS, JOHN F.5/31/00 $1,007.54 11 047669 DEBAERE, DONALD L.6^1/00 $782.45 11 047670 GREGORY, JAMES D.5/31/00 $796.89 11 047671 HANSEN. STEVEN 6/31/00 $864.95 11 047672 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G.6^1/00 $702.56 11 047673 OBRIEN, RANDY L sni/oo $429.85 11 047674 PALMER, GREGORY A.5/31/00 $704.98 ii 047675 RATHBUN, BARRY J.sni/oo $1,013.50 05/30/00 4;02 PM Page 1 .J CITY OF ORONO Check Register Pay Ptfiod Chack f Employaa Name Chack Data Chack Amount r» 'f 11 047676 SKREEN, DALE S.5ni/00 $762.78 11 047677 ABRAHAMSON, FRED W.5/31/00 $242.88 11 047676 BLAIR, JANIS A.5/31/00 $61.39 11 047679 MCINTYRE, WILLIAM E.5/31/00 $308.64 11 047660 NOBLE, ADAM 5/31/00 $91.07 11 047661 PEICKERT, GARY J.sni/oo $269.86 11 047662 PETERSON, JACK W.5/31/00 $382.62 11 047663 ROSS, JOHN A.5/31/00 $130.66 11 047664 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD E 5/31/00 $1,283.19 11 047665 SWENSON, LOWELL C.5/31/00 $241.46 Raport Total t $51,003.62 05/30/00 4:02 PM Page 2 31 Ma/ 2000 MihI 9:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Nunber Date Name Check Number 61493 61493 CXTY COONTY CREDIT ONION 31-May-OO CITY COUNTY CRT3IT UNION Totals Check Number 61493 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Nusiber 61494 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 61494 61494 61494 31-May-OO 31-May-OO 31-May-OO FIRST NATIONAL BANK OP LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OP LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OP LAKES Tbtels Check Nunber 61494 PIRST NATIONAL BANK OP LAKES I Check Number 61495 ICMA retirement trust - 457 63495 31-May-OO ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Totale Check HUsdber 61495 icma retirement trust - 4S7 Check Number Check Number 61496 LAN BfFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 61496 31-May-OO LAN ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Totals Check Nunber 61496 LAN ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 61497 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PKT CT 61497 31-May-OO MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Totals Check Number 61497 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Check Number 61498 MN DEPT OP REVENUE 61498 31-May-CO MN DEPT OP REVENUE Totals Check Number 61498 MN DEPT OP REVENUE Che^ Number 61499 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 61499 31-May-OO ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST ^ Totals Check mEsber 61499 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST Check Number 61500 PEBSCO/OBRA 61500 31-May-OO PEBSCO/OBRA Totals Check Number 615Q0 PEBSCO/OBRA Transaction Amount 7.359.00 7.359.00 3.836.05 3.836.05 9.732.58 17.404.68 300.00 3C0.00 0.00 0.00 190.12 190.12 3.742.78 3.742.78 1.987.68 1.987.68 159.34 159.34 Page 1 Comments SAVINGS W/H a TRAKSPERRED PICA a MEDICARE W/H FICA.MEDCR CITY SHARE FEDERAL WITHHOLDING DEFERRED CCMP W/H UNION DUES WH SKREEN 80010755723 STATE TAX W/H DEF COMP OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H 4 r" 9:29 AM Check Register City of‘Orono Check Humber Lete Name Oieck Humber €1901 61501 PEBSCO/US COHF OP MAYORS 31-May-00 PEBSCO/US COHF OF MAYORS T0t4la Owck Munb«r 61S01 PEBSCO/US CONF OP MAYORS Qieck Number 61502 PERA 61902 61902 31-May-OO 31-May-OO PERA PERA if' Check Humber Totals Check Humber 61502 PERA 61903 UNITED HAY 61903 31-May-OO UHITSO NAY Totals Check Number 61503 UNITED NAY Check MUse>er 61504 NISCONSIN SCTF 61904 31-May-OO NISCONSIN SCTF Totals Check Number 61504 NISCONSIN SCTF Grand Total Transaction Amount 2.658.00 2.658.00 4.539.51 5.918.70 10.458.21 28.00 28.00 184.62 184.62 44.472.43 Page 2 Comments USCM DEFERRED COMP N/H PERA EMPLOYEE N/H PERA CITY SHARE CHARITY DONATIONS N/R J.JOHNSON 10302 7568 98 j •? r CITY OF ORONO Check Register 06/08/00 9:36 AM Page l Pay Period Check # Employee Name Check Date Check Amount 6 047688 PETERSON, BARBARA 047689 MOORSE, RONALD J. 047690 SANSEVERE, ROBERT K. 047691 FLINT, RICHARD 047692 JABBOUR. GABRIEL E. 047693 KELLEY, CHARLES 047667 VOID 6/12AX) 6/12/00 6/12/00 6/12/00 6/12AX) 6/12/00 6/12/00 $269.36 $277.05 $269.36 $269.36 $323.22 $269.36 $0.00 Report Total $1,677.71 • .P • ‘ I’.: .1' Li i ^ ■ I IL t JUn 2000 Thu 2:49 PM Check Register City of Orono Chsck NuR^r Date Name Qieck Number 61506 61506 A-1 RENTAL OB-Jun-00 A-1 RENTAL Totals Check Number 61506 A-1 RENTAL Check Number 61507 ALL STAR PRO GOLF 61507 06-Jun-OO ALL STAR PRO GCLF [ Totals Check U\imber 61507 ALL STAR PRO GOLF Check Number 61508 ALLIED BLACKTOP CO 61508 06-Jun-00 ALLIED BLACKTOP CO Totals Check Number 61508 ALLIED BLACKTOP CO Check Number 61509 APACHE GROUP 61509 06-JUn-00 APACHE GROUP Totals ^eck Number 61509 APACHE GROUP Check Number 61510 AT a T - 61510 06-Jun-00 AT a T - Totals Check NUodaer 61510 AT a T - Check Number 61511 AT a T - TAMPA 61511 06-Jun-00 AT a T - TfMh Totals Check Number 61511 AT a T - TAMPA Check Number 61512 AT a T NIRBLSSS SERVICES 61512 61512 61512 61512 06-Jun-OO 06-Jun-00 06-Jun-00 06-Jun-00 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES Totals Check Number 61512 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES Check Number 61513 AUOIES MOBILE CHEF 61513 06-Jun-00 AUOIES MOBILE CHEF Totals Check Number 61513 AUOIES MOBILE CHEF A ^ Transaction Amount 94.50 94.50 S60.B7 560.87 2.500.00 2.500.00 466.47 466.47 15.70 15.70 9.87 9.87 15.72 75.69 8.11 8.11 107.63 54.36 54.36 Page 1 Comments COMPACTOR RENTAL 12 DOZEN GLOVES PAVE CART PATH C-FOLD TOWELS LONG DISTANCE CHOS WIRELESS Um DISTANCE CELL PHONE -PENCE CELL PHONES CELL PHONES CELL PHONES HOT DOG. CHEESEBGRS • Jun 2000 Thu 2:49 PM Check Number Date Name Check Number 61514 BIFFS INC. 61514 06-Jun-00 BIFFS INC 61514 06-Jun-00 BIFFS INC 61514 06-Jun*00 BIFFS INC 61514 06-Jun-00 BIFFS INC Check Reglsie: City of Or:-^ Page 2 Totals Check Number 61S14 BIFFS INC. Check Nunber 61515 BONESTRCX) ROSENE k ASSCXT. 61515 61515 61515 61515 61515 61515 61515 61515 61515 61515 08-Jun-OO 08-Jun>00 08-Jun-OO 08>Jun-00 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 08-JUn-00 08-JUA-00 Totals Check Number 615 deck MVimber 61516 BRONNELLS. INC 61516 06-Jun-00 BROWNELLS* INC Totals Check Number 61516 BROWNELLS* INC f: Transaction Amount Comments 245.91 PORTABLE - SU^«1IT BEACH 245.91 PORTABLE - HACKBERRY 82.82 PORTABLE - GC 193.22 PORTABLE - BIDERWOOD 767.86 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.100.00 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.304.00 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.38.00 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.2.681.04 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1.205.50 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.266.00 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.494.00 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.170.24 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.17.142.32 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1.216.00 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.23.617.10 MARCH COUNCIL MTQS HOYT PROP INSP SUESS POND GRADING APPLIC MARCH WELL »3 PUMP REP-LOC MAP LS 17-WAADB PROP-REALIGN BRIDGE INSPECTION MARCH ORONO ORCHARD SWR 3/00 HWY 12 LS BYPASS/FSRNDALB NAV PK-DNR GRANT APPLIC 110,45 AR15 CONVERSION KIT 110.45 Check Number 61517 BUDGET PRINTING 61517 06-Jun-00 BUDGET PRINTING 185.32 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT FORMS 61517 06-Jun-00 BUDGET PRINTING 161.61 CONSOLIDATION REPORT 61517 06-Jun-00 BUDGET PRINTING 161.83 POLICE CONTACT SHEETS 61517 06-Jun-00 BUDGET PRINTING 121.91 SEPTIC MANUALS Totals Check Number 61517 BUDGET PRINTING 630.67 Check Number 61518 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 61518 08-Jun-00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 75.59 OIL CHG* MOUNT TIRES 185 61518 08-Jun-00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 46.68 OIL OKS* LUBE 188 61518 08-Jun*00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 113.14 OIL CHG* DIAGNOSTICS 178 , 61518 08-Jun-00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 34.54 OIL CHG* LUBE 182 61518 08-Jun-00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 515.65 REPLACE SENSOR 178 61518 08-Jun-00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 325.24 REPLACE SENSOR 178 61518 08-Jun-00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 34.54 OIL CHG* LUBE 183 w; ■ • JUn 2000 Thu 2:49 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 61518 61S18 61518 61518 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO OB-Jun-00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 08-Jun-OO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 08-Jun-OO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO r. ^ Totals Check Number 61518 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Check Number 61519 CITY OF LONG LAKE 61519 61519 06-Jun-00 08-JUn-00 CITY OP LONG LAKE CITY OP LONG LAKE Tbtels Check Number 61519 CITY OP LONG LAKE Check Number 61520 CITY OP MAPLE PLAIN 61520 06-Jun-OO CITY OP MAPLE PLAIN Totals Check Number 61520 CITY OP MAPLE PLAIN Check Number 61521 CITYVIBH PLOMBING 4 HEATING 61521 06-Jun-00 CITYVIBH PLUMBING 4 HEATING Totals Check Number 61521 CITYVIEW PLUMBING 4 HEATING Check Number 61522 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN 61522 61522 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-OO CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN Totals Check Number 61522 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN Check NU^r 61523 DCA • HIRE ONLY 61523 06-JUn-00 DCA - HIRE ONLY Totals Check Number 61523 DCA - HIRE ONLY Check Number 61524 DEPT OP ADM - INTERTECH GROUP 61524 06-Jun-00 DEPT OP ADM - IKTERTECH GROUP Totals Check Number 61524 DEPT OP ADM - INTERTBCH GROUP Check Number 61525 E-Z RECYCLING 61525 06-Jun-00 E-Z RECYCLING Totals Check Number 61525 E-Z RECYCLING L... Transaction Amount 51.64 86.63 34.54 1«318.19 13.301.14 2.246.10 15.547.24 22.963.08 22.963.08 355.50 355.50 94.55 94.55 189.10 367.91 367.91 207.51 207.51 5.754.84 5.754.84 Page 3 Comments OIL CHG. LUBE. LIGHT 184 OIL CHG. LUBE. ROT TR 189 OIL CHG. LUBE 187 UPGRADE/REPAINT E-11 1/2 CONSOL COSTS-EHLERS FIRE SERVICE YEAR 1998 DRAIN/FAUCET REPAIRS - GC ADV FOR BIDS-ELL SWR ADV FOR BIDS-POX RDO SHR FLEX SPEND ACCT - 5/28/00 PHONE SERVICE RECYCLING 5/00 • Jun 2000 Thu 2:49 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name L Check Number 61526 61526 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 06-JUn-OO BAST SIDE BEVERAGE Tbtals Check Number 61526 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Check Number 61527 61527 EQAN-MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONTRCTR 06-Jun-00 EGAN-MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONTRCTR Totals Check Number 61527 EOAN-MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONTRCTR Check Number 61528 ENGINEERING CONTACTS 61528 61528 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 ENGINEERING CONTACTS ENGINEERING CONTACTS r ^ Totals Check Number 61528 ENGINEERING CONTACTS Check Number 61529 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS 61529 08-Jun-00 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS Totals Check Number 61529 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS Check Number 61530 ESS BROTHERS k SONS 61530 61530 06-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 ESS BROTHERS k SONS ESS BROTHERS k SONS Totals Check Number 6153C ESS BROTHERS k SONS F-; s< ■ OMCk number 61531 BULL’S MANUFACTURINO CO. INC. 61531 06-Jun-00 BULL'S MANUFACTURINa CO. INC. Totals Chock HuiA>or 61531 BULL’S HANUPACTURINO CO. INC. Chock Number 61532 PAST SKSIS 61533 06-Jun-00 FAST SIGNS Totals Check Number 61532 FAST SIGNS Check Number 61533 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 61533 06*Jun-00 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY Totals Check Number 61533 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY Transaction Amount 75.00 75.00 553.06 553.06 77.96 2.56 80.52 6.39 6.39 2.871.24 91.59 2.962.83 406.83 406.83 452.63 452.63 12.00 12.00 Page 4 Comments BEER FOR RESALE REPAIRS TO GS 5 AS BUILT COPIES AS BUILT COPIES AS BUILT COPIES SEALS. RINGS Ikl COVER RINGS. TAR I&I STREET SIGN ID STICKERS KEYS h • JUn 2000 Thu 2tA9 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 5 Check Number Date Name Check Number 61534 61534 PORTIS BENEFITS 00-Jun-OO PORTIS BENEFITS Totals Check Number 61534 FORTIS BENEFITS Check Number 61535 FRANKLIN PRESS INC Totals Check Number 61537 a L CONTRACTING Check NU^r 61538 GALL'S INC. €1536 06-JUn-OO GALL'S INC. Totals Check Number 61536 GALL'S INC. Check Nusiber 61539 GEAR NEST SKI k BIKE 61539 06-Jun-00 GEAR NEST SRI 6 BIKE Totals Check Number 61539 GEAR NEST SKI fc BIKE Check Number 61540 61540 GOLF CAR HIDNEST 06-Jun-00 GOLF CAR MTDNSST Traiisaction Amount Comments 799.48 799.48 JUNE LTD PREMIUM 61535 06-Jun-00 FRANKLIN PRESS INC 2,023.50 CONSOLIDATION NEWSLETTER Totals Check Number 61535 FRANKLIN PRESS INC 2.023.50 Check Number 61536 0 k K SERVICES 61536 06-Jun-OO G a K SERVICES 75.52 UNIFORMS 61536 06-JUn-OO GAR SERVICES 34.84 TOWEL SERVICE 61536 06-JUn-OO G 6 K SERVICES 10.68 UNIFORM - STEFFENKAGQ9 61536 06-Jun-00 G a K SERVICES 16.29 UNIFORM - RATHBUN 61536 06-Jun-OO G a R SERVICES 44.02 MAT SERVICE - ADM 61536 06-JUn-OO G a K SBIVIC^44.02 MAT SERVICE - CC 61536 06-Jun-OO G a K SERVICES 57.20 MAT SERVICE 61536 06-Jun-OO 0 a K SERVICES 89.00 MAT SERVICE - PN 61536 06-Jm-00 G a K SERVICES 15.28 UNIFORMS 61536 06-Jun-OO G a K SERVICES 72.04 UNIFORMS 61536 06-Jun-OO G a K SERVICES 9.67 UNIFORM Totals Check Number 61536 0 a K SERVICES 468.56 Check Number 61537 0 L CONTRACTING 61537 08-Jun-00 G L CONTRACTING 7.583.72 RFP3/F EDGENOOD HILLS SS 61537 08-Jun-00 G L CONTRACTING 1.824.00 RFP3/F EDGENOOD HILLS SS 9.407.72 122.97 122.97 RAIN JCKT-FISCHBNICH 77.70 77.70 MISC BIKE SUPPLIES 1.500.00 GOLF CART LEASE ,rkir I. .,> ■ 8 Jun 2000 Thu 2:49 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Nunber Dete Heme Check Humber m 61540 OOLP CAR MIDWEST 06-Jun-00 OOLP CAR MIDWEST61540 Totals Check Humber 61540 GOLF CAR MIDWEST Check Humber 61541 GOLF COURSE SUPT ASSH OP AMER. 61541 06-Jun-00 GOLF COURSE SUPT ASSN OF AMER. Totals Check Humber 61541 GOLF COURSE SUPT ASSN OF AMER. Check Number 61542 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE 61542 07-JUn-00 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE Totals Check Number 61542 OOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE Check Number 61543 HAIQfXHQ« ROBERT AND JULIE 61543 06-Jun-00 HANNING, ROBERT AND JULIE Totals Check HUmber 61543 KAHHING, ROBERT AND JULIE Check NUniber 61544 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE 61544 06-Jun-00 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE Totals Check Number 61544 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE Check Humber 61545 KEimEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 61545 06-Jun-00 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Totals Check Number 61545 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Check Number 61546 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN 61546 06-Jun-00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN Totals Check Number 61546 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-GEN Che^ Husd^r 61547 HINSHAN k CXJLBERTSON 61547 61547 61547 61547 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON HINSHAN k CULBERTSON HINSHAN k CULBERTSON HINSHAN k CULBERTSON k Transaction Amount 3.91 1,503.91 250.00 250.00 4,918.11 4,918.11 425.00 425.00 95.53 95.53 196.41 196.41 2,243.86 2,243.86 30.96 154.00 1,103.00 13,087.00 Page 6 Cotnments LEVER LOCK mnsHP 6/00-6/01 steffhgn LEADERSHIP WRKSHP-4/lS/OO REFUND-APPL 82514 GRASS SEED, STRAW BOOKING FEES 3/2000 ROOM k BOARD 4/2000 LEGAL MARCH MARCH LEGAL-POLICE COUNCIL MTGS-FEB/MAR 2000 LUZAICH CLEAR CUT TREES • jun 2000 Check Register Pae Thu 3s49 PM City of Orono Check Transaction NUriber Date Name Amount Comnents Check Number 61547 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 61547 08-Jun-00 HINSKAH &CULBERTSON 1.585.00 HOYT RETAINING NALL 61547 Oe-Jun-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 20.00 GORDON NELSON 61547 08-Jun-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 310.00 APRIL LEGAL-POLICE 61547 08-Jun-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 330.00 APRIL LEGAL-POLICE 61547 06-Jun-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 1.100.00 COUNCIL MTGS-APRIL 2000 61547 08-Jun-OO HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 154.54 LEGAL - APRIL 61547 08-Jun-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 1.720.50 LUZAICH CLEAR CUT 61547 08-Jun-OO HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 715.00 HOYT RETAINING HALL Totals Check Number 61547 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 20.310.00 Check Nunber 61548 61548 HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE 06-Jun-OO HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE Tbtals Check Number 61548 HUEBSCH RENTAL SERVICE Check Number 61549 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 61549 08-Jun-00 INTERSTATE BATTERIES TbtBli Check N\»iber 61549 interstate batteries Check Number 61550 JERDB* SUSAN 61550 08-Jun-00 JERDE, SUSAN Totele Check Number 61550 JERDB, SUSAN Check Number 61551 KBINBTH M. POTTS. PA 61551 61551 06-Jun-00 07«Jun-00 u'l STH N. POTTS. PA rra N. POTTS. PA Totele Check Number 61551 KBNNBTH N. POTTS. PA Check NUiter 61552 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 61552 61552 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 LEAGUE OF HN CITIES LEAGUE OF HN CITIES Totals Check Number 61552 LEAGUE OF HN CITIES creek Number 61553 LBHNE'S TIRE SERVICE 06-Jun-OO LEHNE'S TIRE SERVICE61553 22.98 22.98 191.70 191.70 95.00 95.00 2.391.66 552.00 2.943.66 40.00 295.00 335.00 124.50 HAT SERVICE BATTERIES La GOLF CLUBS. BALLS MAY 2000 PROSECUTIONS BERGTAGNOLI-96 NISSAN CITIES BULLETIN SUBSCPTN U4C CONFERENCE-PETERSON TIRE DISPOSAL 99 CLEANUP I . rr i JUXl 2000 Thu 2:49 PH Check Register City of Orono Page 8 Check Humber Date Name Check Humber 61553 61553 LEHHE'S TIRE SERVICE 06-Jun-OO LEHHE*S TIRE SERVICE Totals Check Humber 61553 LEHHE'S TIRE SERVICE Check Humber 61554 LMCIT m 61554 61554 61554 61554 07-Jun-00 07-Jun-00 07-Jun-00 07-Jun-00 LMCIT LMCIT LMCIT I/!CIT Totals Check Humber 61554 LMCIT Check Number 61555 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN 61555 07-Jun-00 liCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN Totals Check Humber 61555 IKCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN Totals Check Humber 61558 LONG LAKH POWER EQUIPMENT Check Number 61560 MEDICA CHOICE Transaction Amount Comments 135.00 259.50 TIRE DISPOSAL 99 CLEANUP 964.00 97.00 38.00 491.00 WORK COMP AUDIT 1999 WORK COMP AUDIT 1999 WORK COMP AUDIT 1999 WORK COMP AUDIT 1999 1,610.00 1,000.00 RAUN CLAM 11030075 1,000.00 Check Humber 61557 LOQIS 61557 08-JUn-OO LOGIS 915.00 POLICE RECORDS APRIL 61557 08-Jun-OO LOGIS 104.50 INTERNET APRIL 61557 06-Jun-OO LOGIS 104.50 INTERNET APRIL 61557 08-Jun-00 LOGIS 210.00 INSTALL E-MAIL 08-Jun-00 LOGIS 210.00 INSTALL E-MAIL L 61557 08-Jun-OO LOGIS 280.00 REPAIR E-MAIL-FIN DEPT S 61557 08-JUn-00 LOGIS 140.00 HENN CTY/STATE CONN W 61557 08-Jun-OO LOGIS -792.00 POLICE APPLIC CREDIT f 61557 08-JUn-00 LOGIS 118.50 POLICE APPLIC DISK SPACE 06-Jun-OO LOGIS 104.50 INTERNET FEB i 61557 08-JUn-00 LOGIS 104.50 INTERNET FEB W 61557 08-JUn-00 LOGIS -792.00 POLICE APPLIC CREDIT 61557 08-Jun-OO LOGIS 118.50 POLICE APPLIC DISK SPACE 61557 08-JUn-00 LOGIS 104.50 INTERNET MARCH 61557 08-Jun-OO LOGIS 104.50 INTERNET MARCH Totals Check Number 61557 LOGIS 1,035.00 Check Humber 61558 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT 61558 06-Jun-OO LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT 31.69 POLE SAN BAR 61556 08-Jun-OO LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT 10.75 FILTERS 61558 08-Jun-OO LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT 14.24 MISC SUPPLIES 56.68 8 JUn 2000 Check Register Page Thu 3:49 PM City of Orono Check Transaction isb- Humber Date Name Amount Comments i Check Number 61560 MEDICA CHOICE V 61560 06-Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 JUNE MEDICA HIGH PREM ! ,61560 06-Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 202.22 JUNE MEDICA HIGH PREM 61560 06-Jun>00 MEDICA CHOICE 1,646.79 JUNE MEDICA HIGH PREMf6156006-Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 606.69 JUNE MEDICA HIGH PREM 1 61560 06-Jun>00 MEDICA CHOICE 606.66 JUNE MEDICA HIGH PREMr6156006-Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 JUNE MEDICA HIGH PREM 61560 06-Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 1,797.53 JUNE MEDICA HIGH PREM 61560 06*Jun*00 MEDICA CHOICE 3,914.14 JUNE MEDICA HIGH PREM ! ^61560 06-Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 202.22 JUNE MEDICA LOW PREM 61560 06>Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 404.44 JUNE MEDICA LOW PREM 61560 06-Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 558.62 JUNE MEDICA LOW PREM r-^ . 61560 06-Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 JUNE MEDICA ELECT 61560 06-Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 2,022.30 JUNE MEDICA ELECT 61560 06-Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 JUNE MEDICA ELECT 6«S60 06-Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 404.46 JUNE MEDICA ELECT 61560 06-Jun-00 MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 JUNE MEDICA ELECT 61560 06-Jun-00 MEDICA aiOICE 3,501.60 JUNE MEDICA ELECT Totals Check HUmber 61560 MEDICA CHOICE 16,878.82 Check Humber 61561 61561 MET 06-Jun-00 COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS MBT COONCIL EMVIfONMENTAL SVCS 19,956.00 WASTEWATER SERVICE 6/2000 Totals Check Number 61561 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 19,956.00 Check Number 61562 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER 61562 06-Jun-00 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER 5,500.00 APRIL 2000 SAC CHQS 61562 06-Jun>00 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER -55.00 APRIL 2000 SAC CHOS Totals Check Number 61562 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER 5,445.00 Check Humber 61563 MGCSA r 61563 08-Jun-00 MGCSA 95.00 KEMBERSHIP-STEFFENHAGEN Totals Check Hlufiber 61563 MGCSA 95.00 Check Ifufflber 61564 MIDIfEST ASPHALT 61564 08-Jun*00 MIDWEST ASPHALT Totale Check Humber 61564 MIDWEST ASPHALT Check Humber 61565 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 61565 08-Jun-00 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 224.96 224.96 ASHPALT - I & I 31.50 OXYGEN. ACETYLENE • JUn 2000 Thu 2s49 PM Ch^ck Ihiiiib«r Check Register City of Orono Page 10 Date Kame Check Nunber 61S6S MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Totals Check Number 61565 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Check Number 61566 HINNEQASCO Check Number 61567 61567 61567 MUNICILITE CO. 06-Jun-00 06-Jun-00 MUNICILITE CO MUNICILITE CO s Totals Check Number 61567 MUNICILITE CO. Check Number 61568 Navarre hardware 61568 06-Jun-00 NAVARRE HARDWARE Tbtals Check Nusdber 61568 navarrb hardware Check Nu^r 61569 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 61569 06-Jun-00 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS Totals Check Number 61569 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS Check Number 61570 NET LITIN DISTRIBOTORS 61570 08-Jun-00 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS Totals Check Number 61570 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS Check Number 61571 NORTHERN 61571 08-Jun-00 NORTHERN Totals Check Nu»^r 61571 NORTHERN Transaction Amount 31.50 23.86 90.95 114.81 5.31 5.31 144.00 144.00 117.00 117.00 53.24 53.24 Cofnments 61566 06-Jun-00 MINNEGASCO 307.27 GAS SERVICE 61566 06-Jun-00 MINNEGASCO 11.28 GAS SERVICE 61566 06-J'in-00 MINNEGASCO 148.76 GAS SERVICE Totals Check Number 61566 MINNEGASCO 467.31 SNAP IN BULB SNAP IN BULP 50W BULB JUNE PERA LIFE SOLO CUPS PLOW CYLINDER Check Number 61572 NSP 61572 08-Jun-00 NSP 1.221.32 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 61572 08*Jun-00 JTSP 492.94 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 61572 08-Jun-00 NSP 9.42 ELECTRICAL SERVICE • Jun 2000 Thu 2:49 PH Check Number Date Name Check Number 61572 61572 61572 61572 61572 61572 61572 61572 NSP 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-OO 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP Totals Check Number 61572 NSP Check Number 61574 OFFICE DEPOT 61574 61574 61574 61574 61574 61574 61574 61574 61574 61574 61574 61574 61574 61574 61574 06-Jun-OO 06-Jun-00 06-Jun-00 06-Jun-00 06-Jun-00 06-Jun-00 08-Jun-OO 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-OO 08-Jun-OO 08-Jun-OO 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-OO 08-Jun-OO OO-Jun-00 OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE DEPOT DF-OT DE“0T DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT Tbtale Check Number 61574 OFFICE DEPOT Check Number 61575 OLD DOTCH POODS INC. Check Regiater City of Orono 61575 06-Jun-00 OLD DUTCH POODS INC. Totals Check Number 61575 OLD DUTCH FOODS INC Check Number 61577 OTTEN BROTHERS 61577 06-Jun-00 OTTEN BROTHERS Transaction Amount 263.69 23.50 3.193.51 1,216.77 628.62 139.33 1,224.58 8,413.68 38.73 23.74 19.42 44.70 111.11 135.80 57.42 222.42 181.98 55.70 99.21 81.16 57.24 194.84 159.41 1,482.88 16.80 16.80 200.25 Page 11 Comments ELECTRICAL SERVICE ELECTRICAL SERVICE ELECTRICAL SERVICE ELECTRICAL SERVICE ELECTRICAL SERVICE ELECTRICAL SERVICE STREET LIGHTING 5/2000 CALCULATOR OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES FOOTRESTS OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES MONITOR STANDS OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES KEYBOARD TRAY OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES MONITOR STANDS OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES CHIPS FOR RESALE Check Nutrcer 61576 OMAN , LYLE 61576 06-Jun-00 OMAN, LYLE 26.97 MILEAGE REIM'JRSEMENT 61576 06-Jun-00 OMAN, LYLE 31.85 MILEAGE REIMURSEMENT 61576 06-Jun-00 OMAN, LYLE 31.85 MILEAGE REIMURSEMENT 61576 06-Jun-00 OMAN, LYLE 8.45 MILEAGE REIMURSEMENT Totals Check Number 61576 OMAN, LYLE 99.12 FLOWERS - GC r -'V- ' jutI ’ 8 Jun 2000 Thu 2:49 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 61577 OTTEN BROTHERS Totals Check Number 61577 OTTEN BROTHERS Chech Number 61578 P fc L AUTOMOTIVE INC 61578 06-Jun-OO P a L AUTOMOTIVE INC Totals Check Number 61578 P a L AUTOMOTIVE INC Check Nuinber 61579 P.P. POffELL 61S79 Oe-Jun-OO P.F. POIfELL Totals Check Number 61579 P.P. POIfELL Check Number 61580 PEPSI-COLA 61580 06-Jun-00 PEPSI-COLA Totals Check Number 61580 PEPSI-COLA Check Number 61581 PBSBK, PAUL 61581 08-Jun-00 PESEK« PAUL Totals Check Number 61581 PESBK« PAUL Qieck Number 61582 PIONEER 61S82 61582 61582 61582 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-OO 08-JUn-OO 08-Jun-00 PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER PIONEER Totals Check Number 61582 PIONEER Check Nusdber 61583 PIRTBX 61583 08-Jun-OO PIRTSK Totals Check Number 61583 PIRTBK Check Number 61584 PONERCLEAN COMPANY INC. 61584 61584 06-Jun-00 06-Jun-00 PONERCLEAN COMPANY INC, PONERCLEAN COMPANY INC, Totals Check Number 61584 PONERCLEAN COMPANY INC. Transaction Amount 200.25 514.00 514.00 150.00 150.00 520.35 52U.35 5,000.00 5,000.00 95.50 213.46 25.28 25.28 359.52 60.77 60.77 963.87 788.61 1,752.48 Page 12 Comments RUSTPROOFINO 8709 M16 TRAINING SODA FOR RESALE GRINDER PMP-1235 LYMAN ORDINANCE 195 1999 DRXING NTR REPORT ADV FOR BIDS-E LL SAN SNR ADV FOR BIDS-FOX RDG SS COMPRESSOR PARTS HAY JANITORIAL SERVICE MAY JANITORIAL SERVICE I Jun 2000 Dm 2:49 PM Check Register City of Orono Oimck Number Date Name 3ieck Number 61585 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE Check Number 61586 RICKS SUPERVALUE I> 61586 61586 61586 08-JUn-OO 08-Jun-OO 08-JUn-OO RICKS SUPERIT^UE RICKS SUPERVALUE RICKS SUPBRVALUE Totals Check Number 61586 RICKS SUPBRVALUE 61587 SAFE ASSURE^ Check Number 61587 06-Jun-00 SAFE ASSURE Totals Check Number 61587 SAFE ASSURE Check Number 61588 SHELTERTECH CORPORATION 61588 08-Jun-00 SHELTERTECH CORPORATION Totals Check Number 61588 SHELTERTECH CORPORATION Check Number 61589 SIGNS OF THE SEASON 61589 06-JUn-00 SIGNS OF THE SEASON Totals Check Number 61589 SIGNS OF THE SEASON Check Number 61590 SNYDER DRUG STORES 61590 61590 61590 61590 61590 06-Jun-00 06-Jun-00 06-Jun-00 06-Jun-00 06-Jun-00 SNYDER DRUG STORES SNYDER DRUG STORES SNYDER DRUG STORES SNYDER DRUG STORES SNYDER DRUG STORES Totals Check Number 61590 SNYDER DRUG STORES Transaction Amount 13.84 12.12 4.60 30.56 3,110.00 3,110.00 1,585.00 1,585.00 87.10 87.10 26.44 7.86 13.93 9.99 32.98 91.20 Page 13 Comments 61585 08-Jun-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 7.80 BASIC LIFE -6/2000 61585 08-Jun-OO PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 5.85 BASIC LIFE -6/2000 61585 08-Jun-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 39.00 BASIC LIFE -6/2000 61585 08-Jun-OO PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 13.65 BASIC LIFE -6/2000 61585 08-Jun-OO PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 3.90 BASIC LIFE -6/2000 61585 08-Jun-OO PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 15.60 BASIC LIFE -6/20C0 61585 08-Jun-OO PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 1.95 BASIC LIFE -6/2000 61585 08-Jun-OO PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 515.10 BASIC LIFE -6/2000 61585 08-Jun-OO PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE -1.65 BASIC LIFE -6/2000 Totals Check Number 61585 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 601.20 RBPRSHMNTS-M16 TRNGING MISC SUPPLIES PORKS, MILK BONE ANNUAL SAFETY TRAINING BOILER/ASBETOS REMOVAL DECALS FOR 8428 BATTERIES, NOTEBOOKS SCOTCH TAPE BATTERIES BATTERIES BATTERIES 8 Jun 2000 Thu 2:49 PM Check Register City of Orono Cheek Number Date Naoke Check Number 61591 61591 61591 61591 STANTON GROUP 06-Jun-OO STANTON GROUP OS-Jun-00 STANTON GROUP 08-Jun-OO STANTON GROUP Totals Checfc Number 61591 STANTON GROUP Check Number 61592 STATE OP MN CPV PROGRAM 61592 08-Jun-00 STATE OF HN CPV PROGRAM Totals Check Number 61592 STATE OF MN CPV PROGRAM Check Number 61593 61593 STEPFENHAGEN, RON 06-Jun-OO STEFFENHAGEN* RON Totals Check Number 61593 STEFFENHAGEN« RON Check NUiAber 61594 STRETCHERS m 61594 61594 61594 61594 61594 61594 08-JUn-00 08-Jhn-00 08-Jun*00 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 STRBICHBRS STREICHBRS STRBICHBRS STRBICHBRS STRBICHBRS STRETCHERS Totals Check Number 61594 STRETCHERS ^eck lAimber 61595 THB HOME DEPOT 61595 08-Jun-OO THB HOME DEPOT Totals Check Number 6159S THE HOME DEPOT Check Number ”• -» 61596 61596 THORPE DIST CO. 06-Jun-OO THORPE DTST CO. p Totals Check Number 61596 THORPE DTST CO. Check Number 61597 TOLL GAS k HELDTNG SUPPLY 61597 08-Jun-OO TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY Totals Check Number 61597 TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY Check Ihn^r 61598 TRACY TRIPP FUELS Transaction Amount 142.80 70.50 67.00 280.30 350.00 350.00 398.36 398.36 14.98 246.65 312.65 177.40 34.55 37.74 823.97 23.55 23.55 60.75 60.75 6.05 6.05 Page 14 Comsients FLEX SPEND ADM 5/2000 COBRA ADM FEE S/2000 COBRA ADM 10/99 CPV MEMBERSHIP 7/1/00-01 GOLF BALLS FOR RESALE HANDCUFFS BABY SWAT KNIFES-RESERVES BIKE PATROL UNIFORMS WNDBRXR,BAG,PANTS-J JOHNS TRAFFIC TEMPLATE IRRITANT LUMBER BEER FOR RESALE CYLINDER RENTAL •( I1 I d Jun 2000 Thu 2:49 PM Check Register City of Orono t Check Number Dete Name Check Number 61598 61598 61598 61598 TRACY TRIPP FUELS 06-Jun-OO TRACY TRIPP FUELS 06-Jun-OO TRACY TRIPP FUELS 08-Jun-OO TRACY TRIPP FUELS Totals Check Number 61598 TRACY TRIPP FUELS t /. i. Check Number 61599 TREADNAY GRAPHICS 61599 61599 06-Jun-OO 06-Jun-00 TREADWAY GRAPHICS TREADWAY GRAPHICS Totals Check Number 61599 TREADWAY GRAPHICS Check Number 61600 61600 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. 06-JUn-OO TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO Tbtals Check Number 61600 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO Check Number 61601 ULTRAMAX 61601 06-Jun-OO ULTRANAX Totals Check Number 61601 ULTRAMAX b.Check Number 61602 UNIV OF MimiESOTA 61602 08-Jun-00 UNIV OF MINNESOTA Totals Check Number 61602 UNIV OF MINNESOTA Check Number 61603 US WEST COftlUNICATIONS 61603 61603 61603 61603 61603 08-Jun-00 08- Jun-00 08 -Jun-00 06-Jun-00 09- Jun-00 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Totals Check Number 61603 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Check Nui^r 61604 VERIZON WIRELESS 61604 61604 61604 06-Jun-OO 06-Jun-OO 06-Jun-OO VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON WIRELESS Transaction Amount 2,163.61 518.57 1,841.78 4,523.96 24.64 56.06 80.70 80.00 80.00 339.00 339.00 330.00 330.00 54.22 44.37 60.22 213.40 103.00 475.21 420.28 13.92 13.91 Page 15 Comments 1600.3 GALS - UNLEADED 470 GALS - DIESEL 1300 GALS UNLEADED DARE KEY RINGS DARE SUPPLIES REPLACE BROKEN C^BLE-?D DUTY AMMO MUNICIPAL CLERXS-HASBMAN PHONE - WATER PLANT ALARM DIALER LS86 PHONE - GC DIR ADV - GC WT TO PW - PHONE LINE CELL PHONES UTILITY PHONE UTILITY PHONE I IC ' y 8 Jun 2000 Thu 2:49 PM Check Register City of Orono r Chsck Number Date Name Check Nus8>er €1604 61604 VERIZON WIRELESS 06-JVm-OO VERIZON WIRELESS Totele Check Number 61604 VERIZON WIRELESS Check Number 61605 W.W. GRAINGER INC. 61605 08-Jun-00 W.W. GRAINGER INC. Totals Check Number 61605 W.W. <»AINGER INC. ^ Check Number 61606 WARNING LITES OP MN 61606 08-Jun-00 WARNING LITES OF MN Totals Check Number 61606 WARNING LITES OF MN Check Number 61607 WBSTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 61607 61607 08-Jun>00 08-Jun-00 WBSTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE WESTSIDB WHOLESALE TIRE Totals Check Number 61607 WESTSIDB WHOLESALE TIRE Check Number 61608 WILLIAMS TOWING 61608 06-Jun-00 WILLIAMS TOWING Totals Check Nunter 61608 WILLIAMS TOWING Check Number 61609 WITTKB. TONY 61609 06-Jun-00 WITTKB, TONY Totals Check Number 61609 WITTXB, TONY Check Number 61610 WRIGHT I^INSPIN ELECTRIC 61610 61610 06*Jun-00 06-Jun-00 imicarr hennepin electric WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Totals CTieck Number 61610 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Check Nusrider 61611 YOUNG. JACKIE 61611 61611 08-Jun-00 08*Jun-00 YOUNG. JACKIE YOUNG. JACKIE r Transaction Amount 160.37 608.48 112.25 112.25 108.95 108.95 22.50 22.50 45.00 70.00 70.00 43.24 43.24 20.34 8.02 28.36 125.00 150.00 Page 16 Comments CELL PHONES CUT OFF WHEELS BARRICADES TIRE DISPOSAL TIRE DISPOSAL TOW 97 SATURN WAGON HEALS - TRAINING ELECTRICAL SERVICE ELECTRICAL SERVICE PARK COM MINlfTES 5/1 CONSOLDTN MINUTES 5/4 1 *m -.'.I fTl r i Jun 2000 Thu 2:49 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 17 Check Number Date Name Transaction Amount Comments Check Number 61611 61611 61611 61611 61611 61611 YOUNO, JACKIE 08-Jun-00 YOUNG, JACKIE YOUNG, JACKIE YOUNG, JACKIE YOUNG, JACKIE YOUNG, JACKIE 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 08-Jun-00 125.00 175.00 125.00 125.00 150.00 CONSOLDTN MINUTES 5/11 PLAN COM MINUTES 5/15 CONSOLDTN MINUTES 5/18 CONSOLDTN MINUTES 5/25 COUNCIL MINUTES 5/22 Totals Check Number 61611 YOUNG, JACKIE 975.00 Grand Total 207,951.37 •1 dMak t:*-' information r t t.ITEMS a;COUNCIL MEETING CoiiMrii mp.ETING JUN 1 2 2000 OF CIIYUI-UHONU I". i I.# rP Fff .• * o ow 1 ^ S' C^r\t Jm 1 1 mi cur.ro„o.«, ciTYof ORONO Municipal Offices Mailing Address: P.O. Box €6 Crystai Bay, MN 55323 0066 Street Address: 2750 Keiiey Parltway Orono, MN 55356 Dear Homeowner: At the direction of the City Council, posts and signs are being installed at the public property comers near your yard. These are being placed there to protect your private property from unwanted trespassing and to identify the public park, lake access, or dock near you. If there are any questions please call Orono City Hall at 952-249-4600. Thanks! 3 awe U) 'LOOO ']o: Cc/'U'afA 6 fc-r \|aA'^ c\r? IfisViAvi iriav-lc -iVAf \qke ^o\a\ 'J s CA(?cc/. "\V\IS lp?\vAq 0.f~< I ^ . Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616 www.ci.oronojnn.us pC'oip'c'f'ly cV\jY\fos- rabc'i.'rt AVxeif Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fa Buckhom Day Committee Long Lake Chamber of Commerce Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department Orono Lions - Pioneer Museum JUN I 2 m 'i. r i , i. i ■■ I Dear Community Member: Buckhom Days is scheduled for Friday, June 23"* and Saturday, June 24“’. NEW this year - CLASSIC CAR SHOW from 10:30 am - 2:30 pm Saturday. ( A schedule of all the events is enclosed with this mailing.) We will be having Rockin’ Hollywoods and Lamont Cranston on Saturday. It should be a great event. Like any large event, volunteers and sponsors are again needed to make it a great success. Sponsorship can start @ $50.00 and up. The price for a specific event starts at $300 and goes up to $4000. If you would like to sponsor a specific event, please call Beth Ulrich @ 449-6800 and she can give you the amount of sponsoring that event. All sponsors will be recognized thru print and banners. Any donation is greatly appreciated and will help defray costs. If you would like to volunteer for helping with set up, beer sales, game staffing or gate staffing, please call Jim Rettinger @ 473-3'Ml Checks can be made payable to Buckhom Days and sent to: S^ate Bank of Long Lake AUn: Sherri/Buckhom Days 1964 W. Wayzata Blvd. Long Lake, MN 55356 Please send checks in by June 15*, 2000 If you have any questions please call Beth Ulrich @ 449-6800. We thank you for your donation and hope to see you at BUCKHORN DAYS!!! Buckhom Day Committee r/T LONG LAKE BUCKHORN DAYS Friday, June 23 - 6:00 pm -12 Midnight 6 pm - Midnight - Carnival Games, Food, Wine/Beer Tent 7 - 8:30 pm - Live Music: Big Carp Daddy & Millfoil Weevils 9:00 - 11:30 pm - Live Music: South Paw Saturday, June 24 -10:00 am -11:30 pm 8 am - 3 pm - Orono Lions’Carp Fishing Contest All Day - Carnival Games and Concessions 10 am - 1 lam - Top Hat Magician Nickoli Wigen & Co. (again from 1-2 pm) 10:30 - 2:30 - Classic Car Show (Awards at 3:30) 11 am - 3 pm - Pony Rides & Petting Zoo 11 am - 6 pm - Coed Volleyball Tournament 11 am - 4pm - Face Painting 11-12 Noon - Live Music: Janie Plante Children/Family Concert (again from 5 - 6pm) 12 Noon - 1 pm Mad Science of Minnesota Show With Interactive Booth (again from 2-3 pm) 12:30 - 4:30 pm - Live Music: The Rockin’ Hollywoods 6-7:30 pm - Water Ski Show “River Rats Ski Team” 7:30 - 11:30 pm - Live Music: Lamont Cranston 10:00 pm - Fireworks Display ADMISSION; $5 - FOR A BUCKHORN BUTTON (Ages 5 and under are free) Button is good for both days, admission to ALL the shows FOR MORE INFORMATION: MARK GARDNER - 497-5407 •* 4 . ■ r. ■ f U--; i \.. % .* .* T • I !?;.•! • I *,j '. i Or», JUN f 2 20, ^ w To: Ron Moorse City Administrator City of Orono May 30, 2000 Dear Ron, I hope you are the right person to send this to, if not please pass it along to the appropriate party. I wanted to recognize an individual in the employ of the city of Orono .whose name I believe is Scott O’Bragnon. A few weeks ago Scott went what I felt to be way out of his way in helping me with some items at the annual Spring Cleanup. I had some very heavy, unwieldy items that I needed help with, and Scott not only stepped up readily, but also did so cheerfully. In this day and age when everyone bemoans the loss of a customer and service orientation in all walks of life, I thought this was a remarkable gesture and one worthy of a letter of praise. In addition, govemmental/union workers have at least stereotypically never been well known for g^^-ing the extra mile in situations like this, so I thought it was all the more noteworthy. 2055 Webber Hills Road Orono, Minnesota 55391 ^‘2-476-1093 Scoff, JC/i CCi Tv /> k TH 12 Fact Finding Meeting May 16,2000 Meeting Minutes Cru I* >(>if Q JUi>l 1 s' 2000 Cl I • wr ^nO/Vu Anendees: Paul Kackelmyer John Hippchen Brigid Gotnbold Thomas O’Keefe Jim Gnibe Sharon Cook Jack 'v'igoran Marv Johnson Jim Smith I. II. Mn/DOT Pre-Design Mn/DOT Access Management Mn/DOT Pre-Design Mn/DOT Pre-Design Hennepin County Independence Maple Plain Independence Independence Tom O’Keefe started the meeting with introductions. He introduced Paul Kackelmyer and announced that Paul will be replacing Scott Pederson. Paul will provide design support for the study. Tom also introduced Brigid Gombold, the project manager for the study. She was ill for the Kick-off meeting last March. Brigid followed saying that the evening meeting w^ a fact fmding meeting with several areas of analysis to review. She stated the objective of the meeting was to identify problems, issues and needs along the corrido' Paul followed with a discussion on the existing roadway conditions. He talked about the following.^ j,jgh^vay has1 2 foot driving lanes. These are standard driving lanes, ii. The shoulder widths vary between 7-10 feet. These are standard, iii The roadway embankment slopes vary between 4 ; 1 ,3:1 and 2:1 . A standard roadway embankment slope is a 4:1 slope 30 feet from the edge of the roadway. When the slope is steeper than the standard cars tend to roll if they leave the road. iv. Substandard RR bridge width under the bridge. v. Substandard curve at the RR bridge. The curve is too tight and also has sight distance problems. . . vi. Several skewed intersections through the cortidor. Because it is more ditTicult for drivers to see traffic coming from both direction there tends to be a higher accident rate at skewed intersections. vii. Poor sight distance at some cross streets. viii Right of way for a by-pass lane vs. a left turning lane. A bypass lane requires approximately 550 sq. ft., where as a left turning l^e requires 17,000 sq. ft.. Turning lanes are safer when traffic volumes arc high. Brigid followed with a map showing all of known environmental consnaints through out the corridor. Morris T. Baker Park is a regional park that had LAWCON funding and requaes National Park Service review if Mn/DOT were to pursue any right of way froin the pi^k. The Burlington Northern Santa Fc Railroad is adjacent to the highway though out the comdor. Moving the railroad is unlikely; therefore any possible design solutions would be to the other side of the road. There are several wetlands adjacent to the highway. Wetland impacts require replacement at a minimum of 2:1 . Mn/DOT’s sequence of action for wctl^d imp^u is to avoid, minimize and replace. Maple Plain’s historical landm.trks were identified, which came from their comprehensive plan. iftiiilhititniii tfitii tu:.’''- LfI !■ IV. :-v'. V. VII. VIII. IX. Traffic data was the next agenda Item. Brigid started with a review of the 1998 Average Daily Traffic (ADT). Next was a list and corresponding map of highways with similar ADT to TH 12 that currently do not have future plans for expansion within the next 20 years, "nie last Item was a map of the forecasted 2020 ADT traffic. Jim Grube stated that CR 6 was in error and would have around 10,000. Crash data was the following agenda item. Brigid started with a map of the study area that split up the road into three segments with corresponding crash rates and accident rates. Each segment was below the Metro average for similar roadway types for the crash rate and severity rate. The next figure showed the location of each reported accident from 1997*1999 through the study area. Historical crash data showed that the crash and severity rates have been fairly consistent in the past nine years. Pie charts showing the different crash types were reviewed for each segment. Land use was the next agenda Item. Brigid stated that land use and transportation are directly related, as access improves land values rise, which brings about more development and creates increased access. The Independence and Maple Plain land use maps was reviewed. Marvin Johnson stated that land values are high in Independence even as large 40 plus acre lots. The city intends to maintain it’s agricultural district in the western two thirds and rural residential in the eastern one third. Independence shows a slow future growth with population at full density of 4,600 occurring after 2020. Marvin said that their city would not benefit to grow over 5,000 people. Maple Plain will reach full development by 2005. John Hippehen followed with a discussivu on access management. He reviewed the access management brochure. His proceeding handouts correlated between access and crashes, and access and speeds. John ended with a summary of the Access Management spacing guidelines. Based on the guidelines TH 12 would be a category 2b through Independence and a category 5 through Maple Plain. There were no new Issues that were not identified at the first meeting. Marvin and Jack both expressed their desire to start developing design concepts. They thought that when a design concept was released to the community it would generate more interest, which would bring about more issues and concerns. Next Steps: i. Identify left turn warrants that meet access guidelines. ii. Coordinate with the Maintenance Unit on any issues and future work. iii. Coordinate a news release in the community papers. iv. Ne.xt meeting July 18*. 2000, at the Independence City Hall at 6:30 If you are interested In the meeting handouts please contact Brigid Gomboldat (651) 581-1319. cc: Gabriel Jabb.ur Vem Genzlinger Wayne Fingalson Herman Icaas Anne Braden Ron Moorse State Senator Gen Olson State Representative Steve Smith State Representative Henry Van Dellen Del Miller Jim Dillman 1 J