Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03-13-2000 Council Packet
Public A ttendance Meeting D ate 3 -c o □□□ C ouncil Planning C ommission Park commission Other ; PlXASE^ ™ THE INFORMATION t REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS, NAME (please print> Tn ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER A^/'n 1 li:i. !Al\J'vi )Uv ’^(u'ldaoi- L L O vj- l-^ - - r ^J< lk / / •.''v 7i ^ 1. iJ)^ ^ /-^ /w--// rrZ^ ______LJ'^y ,L/*-3C c'.S .'L/'C cj s 3. _ 4. _ 5. _ 6. _ 7. _ 8. _ 9._ 10.. 11.. 12.. 13.. 14. 15._ 011399.4 meeting REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ ^ oi I» ur OhONO DATE; March 8,2000 ITEM NO:I Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse City Administrator’s Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Park Commission Interviews The City has received three applications for two positions on the Parks, Open Space and Trails Commission. Copies of the applications are attached. Interviews are scheduled to begin at 6:45 p.m. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: No action required at this time. The Council normally makes a decision regarding Commission {q)pointments at the next Council meeting following the interviews. Application for Citizen Advisory Commission City of Orono Commission Applying for: Parks Commission COIIMCIL meeting MAR 1 3 2000- Name: Address: Telephone: Resident of Orono: Jim Morgan 4725 Bayside Rd, Orono. MN 55359 (H) 495-0706 (W) 745-4941 2 Years QIY Or Unu/VU Work Experience: • President-MittenSoftware, Inc.-1988 to Present Founded firm that develops custom software solutions and publishes programming tools and books. Offices are in Long Lake. Currently employ six employees and keep six subcontractors busy. * Manager • Coopers & Lybrand - Management Consulting Services 1983 to 1988 Managed various consulting projects applying computer technology to solve business problems and improve operations. Business Analyst • Modern Merchandising (Best Products) Developed and implemented various internal controls and top management reporting systems. System Engineer • Electronic Data Systems (EDS) Designed, coded and tested subsystems in a complete work-in-process tracking system. Education: • University of Minnesota • Carlson School of Management Coursework toward Master of Business Administration in general management B.S.B. in finance and marketing. • Certified in Data Processing (CDP) and Production and Inventory Control (CPIM). Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): • Past member Maplewood Jaycees • Past member Delta Sigma Pi Tree planting - personally planted over 500 trees in the past eight years, Reasons for wanting to serve on Commission: I want to make a positive impact on community. I would like to see more parks and a better trail system. View of the role of the commission: • Gather citizens views on park issues • Help disseminate park-related information. • Research park issues. • Develop and maintain a park plan. Make recommendations on park use, access, rules, regulations, equipment, signs and land acquisition. Work with the city, city council, county and other government bodies on park issues. Other Comments: • .^though I have only lived in Orono for two years. I’ve spent my entire life in the Twin Cities area. I grev; up Woodbury on a farm. I witnessed Woodbury grow from 4,000 to over 45,000 currently. I have observed their methods of park and trail planning. My father sold Woodbury larid for a park, so I am familiar with land acquisition practices. I have also lived in Maplewood, Minneapolis, Minnetonka and Plymouth. I enjoy the outdoors. I am an active user of trails and parks. I bike, walk, snowmobile, boat and fish. The construction of Highway 12. potential railway to trail conversion, and the expected growth in population make this a critical time for parks. I understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting. 4 ( Signature Date APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION .. :Ol)NCIL MEEUNG CITY of ORONO k\^ ■f -.t;- a*f^o!g HAR 1 3 2000 Street Address: CUY Uh UHONO 2750 Kelley Partway Orono, MN 553S6 Municipal Offices Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 CrysUI Bay. MN 55323 0066 Commission Applying Fori ^ Parks Commission D Planning Commission □ Community Task Force (Name)_________________________ Name A V\aWOif~S3v^ Address Sho«e OriV Post Office & Zip Code i.CSck>j ^ 5 39 I Telephone (H) rCc>l^^(W) Resident of Orono years. - *88 ‘> Pjust2r»-V~ Work Experience; / i r? \ Upn\.Vn ncKLO-ry- rnr/-gn4!ly achxaYioI) CcV^suJ^Hi.r>ir (pc».yV.inty^ -V.P,^ Qr\4aDgv->Vi\P\gn --------------------------------------------------- Education: P) A — fon^cL- Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): p>ctvr(i\ nngmhji2r - ^V. Jbmo5 ^OEd (po PoriYd ynevy>hje./' BGgyc\ mgfYvV^T - Ucb\Q\Viv\&. Vio-Vl. 6c\f C\ub Telephone (6U) 47J.7357 • FAX 473^1510 PI63S6 statB your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. {P/ease bo as specific as possible. Use additional sheet if necessary.)pecmc as poss/ote. use aaaiuuuai ------ n I (arwi V^ OnbN/gfi Vxtc\c. 4o OtOi>~^0 —v\vi -----------------------------^ .................................................................. pr>rV-^y*^^e?fr>ru:y^iipt'^r>pp»rv CoLvy>^y)'W^Q^ A;VuLCv.yga, OforAo Vx^ r^^^^V! a C +n XriAuAi. rv^'tvc ,AW.fV> uiCAjid ■«y.P' pyc.-\^Tt.rft.mUW ^^^ rvC^rc mOLfry tousy coavi-\y foads \r\ <Oi*oia u:/ rt^,cW*v or v*:a\VL-^-to ■frVe>iCis'hoiv>cs. x i^u.Vd i> n/tA.r\ -*n i'<;y'<nrV 4o-Wu Luce Lma .d Uta +o SfeiL b\U./LOcaVLir\G Qjrvd ~VvciU$> ^ht/ ^<x^-Vy or cl What Is your view of the role of the Commission? Tr> v^foyytmonf^ pojrV-\rn9rn\/gm£»\Vs , ^ O^dAiAiglO^j Qje Vn reN\ci\} por\c ^ izosocre -Wu. best aSQ- -Wu. lavi^ ^ Tn ^.V5>0YN>P v^riVtivrLQ rivpg,^ W ^ PjnpvfmgAt qW- bo^ pcn,0 h yy'\ -VVu- i WlT .. seeA/nJ. You may also attach other materials you would like the Council to consider.) I understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting. r^)nrvT-i^ C\ r.Nrz,^Q^S'^ Signaturt \'-\S-00 Data ••NOTE: Volunteer commission member's name, address and phone number will beccr^e public information. oaotstJt ■iBSMiaitf 1860 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 612-476-2351 COUNCIL MEETING January 26,1999 MAR 1 3 2000 CllVUl-OttONO The Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members: I wish to be considered for appointment to the City Parks Commission. My application is enclosed. I am available to appear for an interview at the Council’s convenience. Feel free to call me if you need additional information. Sinc^ely, I Pauline M. Bouchard APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION O oV. v. • I I .V-.: • I t'>4*7 • -^y'/ CITY of ORONO Monicipal Oflicei C t.. S’ Street Mdrcss: 275-3 K«!lay PaAwy Cfs.-c. Wii 5535c Manias lidnss: P.G. Box cc Crystal Bay. M.'^ 5532!-CC5c Commission Applying For: P^Psrks Commission Planning Com.miss:on Cj Community Task Force (Name)__________________________ •y /.r I -Name ‘ 11 .•< • Lc/* i'./y Address Ii n/ N. t i i Post Office ScZip Code r/? Telephone (H)m Resident cf Orono .y .•years VJork E:^p6rience: Retired from state service in August. 1999; Program manager (division director) of several Minnesota Department of Health environmental programs, 1984-1999; led numerous Internal and external study committees and task forces, with other state and federal agencies, local government, the public and professional communities; Assistant to Division Director, project leader, legal consultant, MN Dept, of Health, 1975-1984; Adjunct Assistant Profession, U of M School of Public Health, Sept. 1991 -June, 1999. Educction: University of MN Law School. Sept. 1973-June 1976, JD degree (MN attorney license #0010017 ) Notre Dame College, Sept. 1954-June 1958, BS Degree in Biology and Chemistry Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): West Suburban Mediation Center (Hopkins MN) Board member 1995-present; Executive Committee 1997-present; and volunteer mediatior since 1991 ; Hamm Psychiatric Clinic (St Paul. MN) Board member 1995-present; Chair of Development Committee. 1998-present American Public Health Lab Association, Board member and Sec Treasurer, 1993-1998; National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference, Baord member 1992-1996, Policy Committee chair, 1996-1999; MN Public Health Association, chair of various committees 1982-1996 Telepkcae (612) 473-7357 ♦ FAX 473-(bl0 Please state your reasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. {Please be as specific as possible. Use additional sneet If necessaryj I would like to scn/e on the Commission for a variety of reasons. First, as one who plans to continue to live In the community for many more years, I want to help assure that parks and public recreational spaces get the support and attention they need, keeping in mind citizens* need for and use of those spaces and the resources available. As a lover of the outdoors and a supporter of organizations whose purpose is promoting and preserving outdoor spaces for recreation anu future enjoyment, I have developed a keen appreciation of the need for responsible decisions about the creation, use and preservation of publicly owned lands. Secondly, as a user of public parks and trails, I want to assure that other Orono residents with similar interests have a voice in deciding the future recreational opportunities which Orono can offer. Thirdly, I have extensive knowledge of and experience in dealing with policy making bodies at the federal, state and county level which could contribute to my effectiveness as a Commission member. And fourthly, one of my retirement goals was to volunteer some time to a local government agency. I would like to donate back to a community in which I have so enjoyed living, and try to make Orono an ever more liveable and enjoyable community for all its citizens, young and old. What is ycur vievy of tha rcla of tha Cc.mmission? The role of the Commission should be twofold: first, to serve as a vehicle to the Council for public intput into decisions which affect Orono's parks and trails, and from the Council back to the public; and secondly, to propose to the Council, on behalf of Orono citizens, actions which will support, maintain and improve the City's parks and trails, including the addition of more parks and trails. In addition to whatever other tasks the Council would assign to it, the Commission should explore opportunities to cooperate with other units of government and landowners to help address public needs for more recreational areas. The Commission should also develop and periodically review a plan for parks and trails, to assure that the City s long term needs are known and addressed. other Comments: iUss th/s space to includa any further informatd.n you would like the City Council to consider, or that you fsel Is relevant to the appointment you are seeking. You /t7£?v a/so attach other .materials you would J:ke the Couned to consider.) Should the cities of Orono and Long Lake merge, there might be disputes regarding parks and trails which my media: on skills could help resolve. I am particularly interested in the possibility ov converting the Dakota Rail Line to recreational use. The fact that County Road 1 5 carries so much vehicular traffic along Brown and Snnith's bays adds to the desireability of converting the rail line to a walking trail. If I were to be appointed to the Commssion, I would do whatever I could to help bring that about. Some neighbors who could provide references include; Orono residents: Greg and Kathy Coward (476-0439). Louis and Carol Bloch (475-1364), Ingrid Lenz Harrison (476-8449). . Others who know of my volunteer and organizational experience are: Cheri Fischer, (933-5000) Executive Director of the V/est Suburban Mediation Center and Mayer of Minnetrista: Ann Thics, (476-1234) Long Lake attorney. I undarstsnd this appcintmc.n: rr.2y ba discussed a: a public meeting.n t- sup- Oy.i ’‘NOTE:Volunteer comm/ss.hn member's name, address end phone number will become public informetion. 34.15?: 3 2. '“'''•*"'11 mfeTINQ MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION HELD AT 5;00 P.M., MONDAY, FEBRUARY 14,2000 MAR 1 ^ 2QQQ 1. Tax Increment Financing c/i • I UmONO Rusty Fifield of Ehlers Associates provided a general explanation of what tax increment financing is and how it works. Kelley indicated a concern that the City could sell bonds for improvements; and a future Council could use the TIF revenue for other purposes, and find itself without funding for the bonds. Kelley also indicated a concern that the City would use the TIF revenue for operating expenses, and would become dependent on the TIF revenue to fund significant services. At the time that the TIF district expired, the City would be left without the TIF revenue, but would still have the demand for the services. Fifield indicated that statutory restrictions regarding how the TIF revenue is used, and the way the City structures its obligations regarding the TIF revenue, can prevent these problems. The Council indicated an interest in obtaining more information regarding a potential TIF district, specifically the potential benefits of a TIF district in Navarre. The Council directed that staff put together information on all parcels along County Road 15 adjacent to the City’s public parking lot and those parcels on the south side of County Road 15. The information will include the current assessed value and ta,xes paid for each parcel, and the assessed value and taxes related to potential development or redevelopment of specific parcels. The Council questioned when the district would have to be in place in order to capture the new taxes related to the new development on the Church property. (Rusty Fifield has indicated the district has to be in place before a building permit is issued for the development.) Governance Issues Jabbour indicated many things are accomplished due to relationships established with key people. It can take years to build these relationships. It is not possible for one person to build the necessary network of relationships. If all Council Members are involved in building these relationships, it would strengthen the City’s ability to impact key issues. Kelley suggested the City take advantage of the knowledge, experience and nenvorks of those who have served the City i ’’.le past, such as former mayors and former commission members. Jabbour indicated there are many good people in the communit)' who would make good mayors and council members, but they will be surprised and potentially overwhelmed by the time and effort required to be an effective mayor or council member. The Council needs to create some sort of a job description so that potential mayors and council members can be clear about what is expected of them. Moorsc indicated the Mayor, Council and City Administrator have not discussed how they can best work together. This includes the most basic aspects, such as communication - who is responsible MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION HELD AT 5:00 P.M., MONDAY, FEBRUARY 14,2000 for keeping everyone informed, what responsibility does each member have for keeping the others informed of his or her activities. Right now, the Mayor plays the key role in communication and coordination. We need a set of guidelines to ensure we can operate effectively, regardless of who Is mayor. Sansevere indicated any guidelines put together should not discourage Mayor Jabbour from continuing his efforts and involvement. Moorse suggested the most effective way for the Mayor, Council and City Administrator to develop an understanding about what is expected of each, and how the> can best work together, is to take a day to work with a consultant/facilitator who is familiar with city governance issues. Dick Flint asked whether it would be better to wait until after the ne.xt election to do this. Jim Murphy indicated an important part of the legacy of the Mayor and City Council is their philosophy and perspective on governance - their thoughts about how the Mayor, Council and City Administrator can most effectively work together for the best interests of the City. If the current Council can work through these issues and provide the next Council with a framework for governance, they will have given the new Council a good head start. Dick Flint asked whether, rather than spending a full day on a Friday, it might work to spend a half day on Friday and a half day on Saturday. Murphy indicated two full days would be ideal, but two half days would work well, since many positive things can happen during the informal social time in the evening between the Friday session and the Saturday session. The Council indicated they are willing to ihove ahead with an off-site facilitated session. 3. Highway 12 Water and Sewer Project Connection Charges Moorse indicated the reduction in connection charges is being proposed for two reasons. 1 The projected revenues exceed the project e.xpenditures. 2. The connection charges are high compared to those in other cities. This puts the City at a disadvantage in its efforts to attract qualit\ development, particularly in the area guided for medium-density residential development. Moorse indicated the owners of the property in the northwest quadrant of Willow and 1 2 may expect to receive a credit against the connection charges, based on a sewer and water assessment paid in 1965. Glenn Cook, the City’s consultant engineer, has indicated it does not appear they would be eligible for a credit. This issue will be further explored prior to bringing final connection charge reductions to the Council. The Council indicated support for the connection charge reduction. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION HELD AT 5:00 P.M., MONDAY, FEBRUARY 14,2000 4. City Administrator Compensation Council discussed various items of compensation, including salary and benefits. The Council determined the City Administrator compensation, effective 9/1/99, will be as follows: Salary: Car allowance: Health insurance family coverage: $78,000 $300/month 100% paid ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor COUNCIL MEETING ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 28,2000 MAR 1 3 2000 ui IT v^r unuivO ROLL The Council met on the above mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Barb Peterson and Bob Sansevere. Council Members Charles Kelley and Richard Flint were absent. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaf&on, Assistant Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Director of Public Services Greg Gappa, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARING • FOX RIDGE SANITARY SEWER PROJECT, 7:03 p.m. • 7:48 p.m. A. Order Preparation of Plans and SpeciHcations - Resolution No. 4428 Gappa indicated this is the second public hearing regarding the Fox Ridge Sanitary Sewer project because the service area is being expanded. Mayor Jabbour stated some of the residents in this area at the last public hearing had suggested that perhaps the City could contribute financially towards the cost of the trunk sewer pipe. Jabbour stated the City has no intention to put this project out for bids if the residents are not in favor of the project. An assessment hearing will be held to determine the final costs of the project once the bids have been received and accepted. Tom Kellogg, City Engineer, stated the original objective of this project was to service the Fox Ridge area, with the service area now being expanded to accommodate the residences along South Brown Road be^veen Fox Ridge and Watertown Road Kellogs stated a pressure svstem is beine proposed, noting the cost is approximately one-half of a gravity system. Kellogg noted another neighborhood informational meeting was held to discuss the expanded service area with three residents in attendance. Kellogg stated the expanded service area could somewhat reduce the costs to each individual property owner. The total estimated project costs are approximately $190,000, with each individual property owner being responsible for approximately $21,000. Kellogg noted the $21,000 includes the cost for a grinder pump at $4500, which may be included in the assessment at the property owner’s discretion. Kellogg pointed out the Fox Ridge area is included in the MUSA area, with all of Long Lake being included in the MUSA area. Kellogg stated the City of Orono does have some additional sewer Page 1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 28, 2000 (Fox Ridge Sanitary Sewer Project, Continued) units available to handle the expanded project area. Gappa stated the total project cost will be divided by the total number of units involved in this project. Dave Phelps, 1950 Fox Ridge Road, expressed a concern that the residents who agree to this project at this time will be incurring the costs for any other individuals who may decide to hook up later. Mayor Jabbour indicated the City of Orono has considered that possibility in the past and has developed a policy that requires the affected property owners to be 100 percent assessed for the project. Jabbour stated the City reviews the area requesting the sewer or water hookup to determine whether any additional properties should also be included in the project area. City Staff has found two to five additional properties which could utilize this sewer line. Jabbour indicated the City is not able to bank the costs of installing the sewer line until the remaining properties, who pruently have conforming systems, elect to hook up to City sewer, which could be many years down the road. Moorsc indicated that many of these properties who are not contemplating hookup presently have conforming systems, with an alternative septic site available in the event their present system becomes non-conforming. Moorse stated some of these properties may not need to hook up to City sewer for ten to fifteen years, if ever. Mayor Jabbour stated the City Council and City Staff has spent a significant amount of time negotiating to acquire additional MUSA units. Jabbour indica ted the City has adopted a policy diat the MUSA units should be made available to those properties who have non-compliant or failing systems. The City has decided that they will allow the residents to include the cost of the grinder pump in with the assessment against their propertv'. Ray Hack, 1995 Fox Ridge Road, inquired what amount of time th.; property owners with the non-conforming systems have to hook up to City sewer. Hack stated he docs not want to assume the costs for those properties who elect to hook up to this sewer line within the new two to three years. Mayor Jabbour stated the City requires non-conforming s>*stems to be hooked up within seven years if they are located within 300 feet of the shoreline and ten years if not within the shoreland zone. Moorse stated City Staff has attempted to inform the residents in this area who have non-conforming systems that it would be to their benefit to hook up to Cit>' sewer now rather than later, noting that they are allowed to pay for their new system over a number of years rather than upfront. Mayor Jabbour noted the City has MUSA units available now, which may not be the case later on. Tom Barrett, City Attorney, stated the City can only assess a property owner the amount by which Page 2 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 28. 2000 (Fox Ridge Sanitary Sewer Project, Continued) their property value increases by the hookup. Barrett stated the City has elected to go with the residents requesting the hookup rather than requiring hookup, unless their system is failing. Jdm Eiss, 15 Brown Road South, inquired what the costs would be two years from now for hookup. Mayor Jabbour stated they would be assessed whatever it costs for hookup. Moorse stated there is approximately a $20,000 connection charge, plus a cost of living charge. Eiss inquired where the $20,000 connection charge goes if a property owner hooks up in the future. Moorse stated the money goes into the sewer fund, which is used to fund sewer improvements throughout the City. Eiss inquired whether the costs for the stubs would be assessed against those property owners who choose to hook up later. Gappa stated the service stub costs will be included in the connection fee for properties that hook up later. Gappa stated the City will have stubs installed for each property to avoid the need to dig up the road in the future. Mayor Jabbour stated the user fees and coimection charges are also used to help maintain the lift stations throughout the City. Doug Coleman, 140 Brown Road South, inquired whether the costs would be reduced if everyone in this area would hook up to City sewer at this time. Kellogg indicated the costs would be reduced with additional hookups, but he was not in a position to say what the magnitude of the reduction would be. Kellt^ remarked that it would be unrealistic to expect all the properties to hook up to City sewer at this time due to the number of conforming systems in the area. Mayor Jabbour indicated the City Council will not proceed forw'ard on this project if the residents are not in support of city sewer. The Fox Ridge residents indicated they were in support of the project. Kellogg commented construction probably will not commence until late summer, early fall of the year 2000. Kellogg stated an assessment hearing will need to be held prior to construction. Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4428, a Resolution Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Fox Ridge and Brown Road South Areas Sanitary Sewer Improvements. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. Page 3 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 28. 2000 CONSENT AGENDA (#2) APPROVE/AMEND Items 4,5,6,8,9.10,11,14,15,16,17, and 18 were added to the Consent Agenda. Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. Sansevere moved, Jabbour seconded, to add Item 7 to the Consent Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 2, Nays 0, Peterson Abstained. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *(tf3) Regular Council Meeting of Febru.'try 14,2000 Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of February 14, 2000, ns submitted. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Irene Silber, Representative Silber stated she is in the process of completing the grant application for the Navarre Paric, noting they would like to get 50 percent of the improvement costs for the Navarre Park from this grant. Silber noted a public hearing has been scheduled for March 27 regarding the Navarre Park to gain the local residents' input on what they would like to sec for tliis area. Sansevere inquired whether the Park Commission has gotten any public feedback on this park. Silber stated there has been some good feedback regarding the Navarre Park. Mayor Jabbour mdicated the City is interested in establishing a TIP District in Navarre, which could perhaps help finance the park impro\'cments. Jabbour extended his appreciation to Silber for her efforts on writing the grant. Jabbour commented the City is willing to support the Park Commission in attempting to obtain this grant from the DNR. Silber thanked the City Council for their support. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT - Lili McMillan, Representative McMillan stated a public hearing was held regarding the placement of buoys in the Big Island area of Lake Minnetonka to create a public safety access lane. McMillan noted the general public was opposed to the placement of buoys. McMillan stated in her view the general public is entitled to access Page 4 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 28, 2000 .L . i (LMCD, Continued) to this area, but placement of buoys would help address the safety concerns in the channel. McMillan noted the Task Force will continue to address this issue. San^evere stated in his view some of the concerns expressed are very valid and should be addressed. Sansevere inquired whether the lane could be reduced to 20 feet, with access being limited to the water patrol. Mayor Jabbour commented the people in this area need to act logically and reasonably when navigating the channel. Jabbour stated in his view people will continue to swim to shore as well as swim in the safety lanes, which should be discouraged. Jabbour stated people need to have access f to those lanes. McMillan stated some consideration has been given to making the lane a dead-end to eliminate people crossing over. Mayor Jabbour pointed out people with jet skis will also utilize this lane. McMillan commented a large number of boats utilize this area every day of the week, with some measures needing to be taken to address the safety issues. Mayor Jabbotr stated in his opinion the LMCD needs to continue to support tlie local police force. McMillan stated the LMCD will be appealing the special deputy case to the Supreme Court, noting it would be in the best interests of the L.MCD if this case is overturned. Mayor Jabbour noted the special deputies consist of volunteers. Jabbour stated the special deputies are entitled to do citizen arrests. He indicated the lake area cities need to get involved to ensure adequate public safety staffing on the lake. Sansevere suggested approaching some of the local TV stations about tliis issue. Sansevere stated in his view there are some very serious safety issues tliat need to be addressed. McMillan commented that perhaps some additional ambassadors on the lake would be beneficial as well. McMillan stated one of the problems is the large territory that needs to be covered. Mayor Jabbour stated the City should take steps to promote personal responsibility as well as educate the residents on the proper way to use the lake and channel. Sansevere commented that unfortunately there are some people who use this lake who arc not responsible in their actions and arc causing problems for the others. McMillan stated the LMCD will continue to pursue both issues. Page 5 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 28, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sandy Smith, Representative Smith stated she had no comments but would be available for any questions the Council Members may have. PUBLIC COMMENTS None ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT *(«4) #2400 MARK AND ARLETTE PLOEN, 4345/4365 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - CLASS I SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 4424 Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Application #2400, Mark and Arlette Ploen, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4424, a Resolution Approving a Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement for Properties Located at 4345 and 4365 North Shore Drive; and Granting of Variances to Lot Width. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. *(#5) #2554 ANN AND GIL ANDERSON, 845 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 4425 Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Application #2554, Ann and Gil Anderson, 845 Willow Drive South, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4425, a Resolution Granting Variances to Allow the Construction of an 18' by 10' Master Bedroom Addition to the South Side of the Existing Residence. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. *(#6) #2558 ANTHONY AND LINDA PATTERSON, 1780 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4426 Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Application #2558, Anthony and Linda Patterson, 1780 Shady wood Road, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4426, a Resolution Granting Variances to Permit the Construction of a Second Story, Replacement of a Lakeside Deck, and Replacement of a Side Entrance to the Existing Residence. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. •(#7) #2561 FRANK AND BARBARA PETERSON, 1261 ARBOR STREET - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4427 Sansevere moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve Application #2561, Frank and Barbara Peterson, 1261 Arbor Street, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4427, a Resolution Granting Variances to Permit Construction of a Two Stall Detached Garage. VOTE: Ayes 2, Nays 0, Peterson Abstained. Page 6 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 28. 2000 MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT iUS) CENSUS 20G0 PROCLAMATION Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt the Census 2000 Proclamation. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. ENGINEER REPORT («9) BID AWARD - 2000 i>UTERIALS AND EQUIPMENT P^ferson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and accept the low bids for the calendar year 2000, as outlined in Director of Public Services Gappa's Memorandum dated February 25,2000. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#10) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #4 - ORONO ORCHARDS SANITARY SEWER Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Request for Payment #4, Orono Orchards Sanitary Sewer Project to Widmer, Inc., in the amount of $19,902.50. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. *(#11) SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING FOR NAVARRE PARK IMPROVEMENTS GRANT Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to schedule a Public Hearing on the DNR Grant for Navarre Playground Improvements for March 27,2000, at 7:00 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 3, N.*iys 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#12) WAYZATA MARINE, 3324 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - MARINA LICENSE Gary Briggs. President of Wayzata Marine, and David Briggs, Wayzata Marine, were present. GafTron stated Gary Briggs is in the process of acquiring Lakeside Marina and is requesting approval of a 2000 Commercial Marina License to operate his business at this site. Wayzata Marine will continue many facets of Lakeside’s past operation, including rental of in-water boat slips; sales of boats, motors, trailers and marine accessories; repair and servicing of boats; on land boat storage both summer and winter; and marine fuel sales. Gaffron stated tliis site is located in the B-2 Lakeshore Business District in which marina operation is the intended pcmiittcd use, which has existed at this site for the past 30 years. Gaffron noted the Page 7 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 28, 2000 (Wayzata Marine, Continued) proposed use is not changing at this time. GafTron stated the City Council is entitled under City Code to hold a public hearing on a marina license if Council deems it appropriate, but a hearing is not mandatory unless the Applicant requests one in the case of a revocation or denial. Staff feels there is no need for a public hearing on this application. City Staff is recommending the licensee adliere to the following Minimum Operation Standards: 1. Parking facilities on the site shall be managed so as to eliminate traffic or parking congestion, eliminate illegal on-street parking, and avoid pedestrian traffic through neighboring properties. 2. Boat engine testing and charging shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3. .Retail sales and service shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. e.xcept as necessary to accommodate normal fishing activity or private use of premises stored boats. 4. The site shall be kept neat and orderly and free of garbage. 5. On-land storage of boats shall be managed so as to eliminate any view obstructions for traffic entering and leaving the site. 6. Parking and cn-land storage of boats, trailers, materials and equipment shall be limited to those locations shown on an approved site operation plan, which plan shall be submitted or updated as part of the armual license application. Such site operation shall also indicate seasonally variable uses. 7. Lights shall be shielded from the road, the lake, and adjacent properties. Gaffron noted Lakeside Marina has removed its old non-confomiing underground gasoline tanks and had intended to replace them with an above-ground system during 1999. The new owner will need to proceed with replacement of the old tanks, which may result in the need for setback or hardcover variances. Gaffron stated the Applicant will also need to complete tlic fence that has been partially installed along the easterly border as well as to have boats parked five feet back from the fence to avoid any problems with debris being dumped in the area. Gaffron stated tlic addition of vegetative screening would also provide an added benefit to the neighbor. Gaffron stated the new owner has also been advised that use of the DNR landing to satisfy business operations will not be allowed. City Staff recommends approval of a 2000 Commercial Marina License to Wayzata Marine. Mayor Jabbour stated the City welcomes and encourages business ventures in Orono. Jabbour stated in his view this will be a major asset to the community, noting that Wayzata Marine provides high-quality products. Page 8 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 28. 2000 (Wayxata Marine, Continued) Gary Briggs, Wayzata Marine, stated they are willing to eontinuc to work with City Staff on complying with the required conditions as well as improving the property. Sansevere inquired whether they will offer boat slips to people who buy boats from Wayzata Marine. David Briggs stated they will not be displaeing any boats at this time, noting the rates for boat storage may increase. Briggs stated they currently have a waiting list for boat slips. Gary Briggs stated they are looking forward to working with the City. Sansevere moved. Peterson seconded, to approve the issuance of a 2000 Commercial Marina License to Wayzata Marine for operation of a marina at 3324 North Shore Drive, subject to compliance with the seven 'Operation Standards'. VOTE: Ayes 3. Nays 0. («13) SHEVLIN DRIVE STOP SIGN REQUEST Moorse stated City Staff has reviewed the possibility of installing a stop sign at the Shevlin Drive/ Willow Drive intersection to address concerns regarding safety and the speed of traffic raised by r local resident. The Police Chief and the City Engineer arc botli recommending against the three-way stop sign. The citizen has been contacted and told of the recommendations. Moorse stated the citizen has expressed some concerns regarding increased traffic and potential safety issues during the construction of the new' Highway 12 corridor. Moorse stated City Staff will continue to monitor this situation. Sansevere mquired whether a temporary stop sign could be installed during construction. Moorse stated City Staff can revicAV that option. Mayor Jabbour commented City Staff should keep an accounting of the costs involved in responding to a situation such as this. Gappa stated he has very little time involved in this matter. Kellogg stated liis office spent approximately one hour reviewing the situation. *(#14) METRICOM RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the right-of-way agreement with Metricom, Inc., and to authorize the M.ayor and City Administrator to sign the agreement. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. Page 9 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 28, 2000 •(#15) EXTENSION OF CONTRACT FOR PROPERTY ASSESSMENT SERVICES Peterson .'noved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the extension of the contract with the Hennepin County Assessor's Office for Property Assessment Services for a four-year period ending on July 31,2004. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. *(#16) CDBG GRANT APPLICATION - RESOLUTION NO. 4429 Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4429, a Resolution Approving Submittal of a Request for Project Funding for the 2000 Urban Hennepin County Consolidated Pool Community Development Block Grant Program and Authorizing Signature of Subrecipient Agreement with Hennepin County and any Third Party Agreements. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. •(#17) AMENDMENT OF FEE SCHEDULE ORDINANCE TO REMSE THE 1989 WATER AND SEWER PROJECT CONNECTION CHARGES - ORDINANCE NO. 195, SECOND SERIES Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 195, Second Series, an Ordinance Amending the 2000 Fee Schedule. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. *(#18) REQUEST BY SCOTT THOMAS FOR A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR HIS REAPPOINTMENT TO THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to authorize City Administrator Ron Moorse to Prepare a Letter of Support for the Reappointment of Scott Thomas to the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Tom Barrett requested an executive session witli the City Couneil. •(#19) LICENSES Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the following licenses: Special Event Permit: Clyde Gates Foot Race Page 10 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 28,2000 Wayzata Central Middle School to Luce Line and approximately 4 1/2 miles out and back AprU 8,2000 8:30 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Cigarette License: James Anderst Jimmies Lounge 3380 ShorelineDrive *(/V20) BILLS Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 8:52 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:52 p.m. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 11 Application Date: Application Deadline: 12/22/99 4/10/00 COIJNCIL MEETING MAR 1 3 2000 Cl I V Ul- U mOin U REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 13,2000 ITEM NO.: _5^ Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2556 Collins and Barbara Cavender 1395/1405 Rest Point Road Variances Zoning District: Lot Area: LR'IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (I Acre) 13,238 combined square feet (.30 acre)_______________ List of Exhibits: B C D Draft Resolution Site Plan Draft Planning Conunission Minutes (February 23, 2000) Planning Report (February 23,2000) .Application Summary: The applicants have proposed to remove an existing residence from the property located at 1405 Rest Point Road and combine the lot with a vacant lot located at 1395 Rest Point Road. Combined the two lots are 13,238 square feet (.30 acre) in the LR-IB (1 acre zoning district). The applicants have requested variances to permit construction of a single family home on the property. The proposal first reviewed by the Planning Commission was to permit 2,298 square feet (17.4%) of structure for a new residence where 1,171 square feet (8.8%) exists and 1,985.7 square feet (15%) is allowed. The applicants were advised at the January Planning Commission meeting to reduce the total structural coverage to 15% on the lot. The new site plan (Exhibit A) is attached. The applicants did revise the proposed plan to meet the conditions set by the Planning Commission. This application requires the following variances: 1. 3. 4. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) and (B) to permit structure within 75' of the lakeshore. The applicants have proposed to construct a new residence 34* from the lakeshore where 75' is required. 2. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit structure and hardcover within 75' of the lakeshore. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit 2,129 s.f. (22.4%) hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback where 1,546 s.f. 03.6%) exists and no hardcover is allowed. The previous proposal was to permit 2,406 s.f. of hardcover in the 0- 75’ lakeshore setback. Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit a new residence to be constructed within the 35' street setback. The proposed residence encroaches 13.67' into the setback. To permit a new residence to be constructed on a lot less than 1 acre in size in the LR-IB zoning district. The proposed setback from the front property line has not changed, and to permit new construction on a lot less than one acre in the LR-IB zoning district. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 4 to 0 vote to approve the variances to permit tear down of the existing structure and construction of a new residence on the combined properties. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • Staff recommends approval of the variances for the revised application based on the following: A. The property has been developed and used as a residential property for many years. To complete the application it is a requirement the lots be combined to permit the construction. B. Most of the property is located within 75 feet of the lakeshore. It is nearly impossible to locate a house outside of the 75 foot setback requirement without building on the street right-of-way line. Other houses in the locality are located at comparable setbacks from the lakeshore. C. The City of Orono owns and maintains a lift station located on the property. The City has a regular weekly inspection schedule for lift stations. It is reasonable to expect a “buffer” between the house and the station based on regular inspections. The City of Orono is also communicating with the applicants about obtaining an easement for the lift station. It is not known why an easement was not recorded with the project in the early 1 970’s, but an easement should be recorded in favor of the City. Lift stations tend to emit odors on occasion. The propert>- owners need to construct the house as far as reasonably possible from the street is to distance themselves from the structure. D.The lot has a very limited building pad. Any new construction on the property would require setback variances. Because Rest Point Road is narrow it is not possible to park cars on the street without causing a public safety issue. Each lot along Rest Point Road will require off street parking areas to acconunodate quests. The City Code requires all garages with doors facing a street to be located 30 feet from the property line to allow off street parking, thus requiring the house to be located further from the property line. E.A condition of approval is the applicants shall combine the two separate tax parcels. The combination is required to allow the proposed development to meet the approved structural coverage and to permit the additional hardcover, and the proposed house is located on the existing property line. No structures are permitted to be located on a property line. This condition shall be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. F.The applicants have agreed to grant an utility easement over the portion of the property that contains the lift .station. The lift station was constructed in the 1970s without an easement ever being recorded. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To approve or amend the enclosed resolution. r Illti ft VUrr A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2; SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8; SECTION AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L)(l) FILE NO. #2556 WHEREAS, Barbara Cavender and Collins Cavender (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1405 Rest Point Road and have an interest in the property located at 1395 Rest Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lot 24 and Lot 25 Subdivision of Lot 14, Rest Point Park, Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on January 19, 2000 and February 23, 2000 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (A) and (B) to permit a new residence 34' from the lakeshore where 75' is required; Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit structure and hardcover within 75' of the lakeshore; Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit 2,129 s.f. (22.4%) hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback where 1,546 s.f. (13.6%) exists and no hardcover is allowed; and Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit a new residence to encroach 13.67' into the front yard setback, within the 35' street setback and to permit a new residence to be constructed on a lot less than 1 acre in size in the LR-IB zoning district. Page 1 of 7 Minnesota: 1. 2. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2556. The property is located in the LR-IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum lot size of 43,560 s.f. the “property is 13,238 s.f. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 23, 2000 and recommended approval on a vote of 4 to 0 for the variances based upon the following findings: A. The property has been developed and used as a residential property for many years. To complete the application it is a requirement the lots be combined to permit the construction. B. Most of the property is located within 75 feet of the lakeshore. It is nearly impossible to locate a house outside of the 75 foot setback requirement without building on the street right-of-way line. Other houses in the locality are located at comparable setbacks from the lakeshore. C. The City of Orono owns and maintains a lift station located on the property. The City has a regular weekly inspection schedule for lift stations. It is reasonable to expect a “buffer” between the house and the station based on regular inspections. The City of Orono is also communicating with the applicants about obtaining an easement for the lift station. It is not known why an easement was not recorded with the project in the early 1970 ’s, but an easement should be recorded in favor of the City. Lift stations tend to emit odors on occasion. The property owTiers need to construct the house as far as reasonably possible from the street is to distance themselves from the structure. Page 2 of 7 4. 5. D.The lot has a very limited building pad. Any new construction on the property would require setback variances. Because Rest Point Road is narrow it is not possible to park cars on the street without causing a public safety issue. Each lot along Rest Point Road will require off street parking areas to accommodate quests. The City Code requires all garages with doors facing a street to be located 30 feet from the property line to allow off street parking, thus requiring the house to be located further from the property line. E.A condition of approval is the applicants shall combine the two separate tax parcels. The combination is required to allow the proposed development to meet the approved .structural coverage and to permit the additional hardcover, and the proposed house is located on the existing property line. No structures are permitted to be located on a property line. This condition shall be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. F.The applicants have agreed to grant an utility easement over the portion of the property that contains the lift station. The lift station was constructed in the 1970s without an easement ever being recorded. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 3 of 7 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (A) and (B) to permit a new residence 34' from the lakeshore where 75' is required; Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit structure and hardcover within 75 ’ of the lakeshore; Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit 2,129 s.f. (22.4%) hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback where 1,546 s.f (13.6%) exists and no hardcover is allowed; and Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit a new residence to encroach 13.67' into the fi-ont yard setback, within the 35' street setback and to permit a new ref.idence to be constructed on a lot less than 1 acre in size in the LR-IB zoning district. 1.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (March 13, 2001). 2.Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3.The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of March, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 4 of 7 ‘'.'XWIBU al«in,r.T—'i/fi rriiaL.•.'/ r.:j ■ ’Ml .1.*- r.i Property Owner (s) Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 13th day of March, 2000 Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 20 ___before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the pcrson(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) e.xecuted the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 7 r STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 20 ___before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the pcrson(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 20 ___before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 20 ___before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 6 of 7 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000 the Applicant's primary septic site falls, and Identification of a secondary septic site on^ Applicant's property, and further subject to submittal of an accurate sket^^^pidfmg the location of the proposed pool and secondary septic site. VOTgj^J^8s^4, Nays 0. (»2) #2551 THOMAS MICHAEL RAN PERMIT ID, 2765 SHAOYWOOD ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE This appi was not heard due to the absence of the Applicant (#3) #2556 BARBARA AND COLUNS CAVENDER, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 1405/1395 REST POINT ROAD - VARIANCES, 7:00 p.m. - 7:13 p.m. Barbara and Collins Cavender, Applicants, were present. Weinberger stated the Planning Commission reviewed this application at its January 19,2000 meeting where the application was tabled to allow the Applicants time to revise their plans In order to comply with the 15 percent structural coverage limit and address concerns regarding the lakeshore setback. The Applicants have submitted revised plans which reflect a reduction in total structural coverage to 15 percent. The proposed setback to the lake is now 34 feel as opposed to the 30 feet originally proposed. The house would be located further from the lake If the shoreline were consistent across the full width of the property. Weinberger commented many other primary residences along this road are located at a distance comparable to the 34 fool setback. Weinberger noted the City of Orono currently owns and maintains a lift station on the property. The proposed location of the house creates the greatest distance possible on the lot from the lift station. Weinberger staled this application requires variances to pennit structure within 75 feel of the lakeshore as well as variances to permit structure and hardcover within 75 feet of the lakeshore. In addition, variances to hardcover in the 0-75' setback Is required and a variance to the street setback. The proposed residence will encroach 13.67 Into the setback. City Staff Is recommending approval of this application subject to the following conditions: Page 5 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000 A. The property has been developed and used as a residential property for many years. To complete the application it is a requirement the lots be cor.tined to permit the construction. B. Most of the property is located within 75 feet of the lakeshcre. it is nearly impossible to locate a house outside of the 75 foot setback requirement without building on the street right-of-way line. Other houses in the locality are located at comparable setbacks from the iakeshore. C. The City of Orono owns and maintains a lift station located on the property. The City has a regular weekly Inspection schedule for lift stations. It is reasonable to expect a "buffer* between the house and the station based on regular inspections. T^e City of Orono is requesting an easement for the lift station. D. The lot has a very limited building pad. Any new construction on the property would require setback variances. Because Rest Point Road is narrow, it is not possible to park cars on the street without causing a public safety issue. Each lot alorj Rest Point Road will require off street parking areas to accommodate quests. City Code requires all garages with doors facing a street to be located 30 feet from the property line to allCiV off street parking, thus requiring the house to be located further from the property line. Mr. Cavender stated Weinberger has done a thorough job presenting the application. Cavender stated one item that was accidentally omitted was a 4* by 4' concrete pad for an air conditioning unit. Hawn commented the proposed plan is an improvement to wttat currently exists on the lot. noting the Applicants have complied with the direction of the Plannl.'.g Commission. Kluth commented he does not ive a problem with the application. There were no public comments regarding this application. Mrs. Cavenuer inquired whether she would be permitted to d: some limited landscaping near the lift station. Weinberger recommended the Applicants work with the Putrc Works Department on that issue, noting the City typically encourages some plantings in that a.'sa. Smith moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend approval cf Application #2556, Barbara and Collins Cavender, 1405/1395 Rest Point Road, granting cf variances to permit structure within Page 6 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000 75' of tho lakeshore, variance to average lakeshore setback, variance to street setback, and a variance to hardcover within the 0-75’ setback, subject to the two lots being legally combined and granting of an easement to the City for the lift station, with the understanding a 4’ by 4’ concrete pad will be allowed for an air-conditioning uniL Hawn inquired whether ail the patio and underlayment depicted in the diagram will be removed. Mrs. Cavender indicated it will be. Weinberger noted a variance to the average lakeshore is not required in this case. Kluth moved, Hawn seconded, to delete the variance to average lakeshore setback from J TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:February 23,2000 SUBJECT: #2556 Barbara and Collins Cavender 1395/1405 Rest Point Road Variances-Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area:13,238 combined square feet (.30 acre) List of Exhibits: A B C D E Revised Site Plan Submittal #1 Submittal #2 Draft Planning Commission Minutes (January 19,2000) Staff Report (January 19,2000) Planning Commission Recommendation and Application Summary: The Planmng Commission voted 5 to 0 to table the application for variances for property located at 1395/1405 Rest Point Road. The applicants have proposed to remove an existing residence from the property located at 1405 Rest Point Road and combine the lot with a vacant lot located at 1395 Rest Point Road. Combined the two lots are 13,238 square feet (.30 acre) in the LR-1B (1 acre zoning district). The applicants have requested variances to permit construction of a single family home on the property. The proposal reviewed by the Planning Commission was to permit 2,298 square feet (17.4%) of structure for a new residence where 1,171 square feet (8.8%) exists and 1,985.7 square feet (15%) is allowed. The applicants were advised to reduce the total structural coverage to 15% on the lot. The new site plan (Exhibit A) is attached. The Planning Commission tabled the application at the request of the applicants. The applicants have revised the plans addressing the following concerns: 1.They have reduced the total structural coverage on the lot to 15%. The total proposed square feet of structure is 1,985.4 square feet where 1,985.7 square feet is allowed. Applicants have removed 312 square feet from the footprint. it2556 Barbara and Collins Cavender 1595 1405 Rest Point Road Variances 2/2300 Page I 2. The previous proposal indicated a 30 foot setback to the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. Some members of the Planning Commission were concerned about the distance from the lake. Reducing the total lot coverage to 15% has removed a portion of the house on the lakeside. The proposed setback is now 34 feet from the OHWL. Please refer to the enclosed site plan, revised 2/1/00 attached as Exhibit A. As the survey shows there is a small break in the shoreline directly in front of the proposed residence. The house would be located further from the lake if the shoreline where consistent across the full width of the property. The City of Orono owns and maintains a lift station on the property. The property ovmers have located the house to create the greatest distance possible on the lot from the lift station. Many other primary residences along Rest Point Road are located at a distance comparable to the 34 foot setback proposed. The house to the north was approved two years ago to be replaced 32 feet from the lakeshore, and the house to the south, across Rest Point Road is located at a 35 foot setback from the lakeshore. Lot History: The previous property owner of the vacant parcel had requested variances to permit new construction which included lakeshore setback, lot area, lot width, hardcover and structure the application was reviewed by the Planning Commission in January, 1998 and recommended for denial based on the size of the lot and lack of a sewer stub. The application was withdrawn by the applicant and was not reviewed by the City Council. *This was only for the vacant parcel not the developed parcel. This application requires the following variances: 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) and (B) to permit structure within 75 ’ of the lakeshore. The applicants have proposed to construct a new residence 34' from the lakeshore where 75' is required. 2. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit structure and hardcover within 75' of the lakeshore. 3. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit 2,129 s.f. (22.4%) hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback where 1,546 s.f. (13.6%) exists and no hardcover is allowed. The previous proposal was to permit 2,406 s.f of hardcover in the 0- 75 ’ lakeshore setback. 4. Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit a new residence to be constructed within the 35’ street setback. The proposed residence encroaches 13.67’ into the setback. To permit a new residence to be constructed on a lot less than 1 acre in size in the LR-1B zoning district. The proposed setback from the front property line has not changed, and to permit new construction on a lot less than one acre in the LR-IB zoning district. Barbara and Collins Cavender 1595 NOS Rest Point Road 1 ariances 2 :ioo Page 2 No variance for lot coverage is required because the structural coverage has been reduced to 15%. ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IC Lol Area Lot Width Lakeshore Side Yard Street Yard Required 43,560 s.f.140'75'10'35' Existing 13,238 s.f.124'41 ’3.5'O' Proposed 13,238 s.f.124'35'10'21.33' The subject lot is 0.3 acre where 1.0 acre is required for new construction. Variances are required for lakeshore setback, front yard setback and lot area to permit new construction. Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 13,238 s.f.Existing: 1,171 s.f. Proposed: 1,985 s.f. 8.8% 15% Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0'-75' • 9,507 s.f.1,546 s.f. (16.3%) none (0%) 2,129 s.f. (22.4%; To permit new construction 75'-250'3,731 s.f.507 s.f. (13.6%) 126.75 s.f. (25%) 701 s.f. (18.8%) none U2556 Barbara and Collins CavenJer 1395/NOS Rest Point Road Variances 2/2300 Pages The property has been previously developed prior to the adoption of the current zoning ordinance and by reviewing existing and proposed site plans it is clear there is only a small legal building pad on the property. Most of the lot exists within 75’ of Lake Minnetonka so it should be assumed to develop the lot some structure and hardcover would be located within 75' of the lakeshore. The hardcover calculation does not include hardcover that is located on the property for a lift station. The lot has been credited for the 41 square feet of hardcover. *No utility easement has been granted for the lift station installed on the property. Varianr^; STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP Applicant ’s hardship is included with Exhibit C. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variances for the revised application based on the following: A. The property has been developed and used as a residential property for many years. To complete the application it is a requirement the lots be combined to permit the construction. B. Most of the property is located within 75 feet of the lakeshore. It is nearly impossible to locate a house outside of the 75 foot setback requirement without building on the street right-of-way line. Other houses in the locality are located at comparable setbacks from the lakeshore. C. The City of Orono owns and maintains a lift station located on the property. The City has a regular weekly inspection schedule for lift stations. It is reasonable to expect a “buffer” between the house and the station based on regular inspections. The City of Orono is also communicating with the applicants about obtaining an easement for the lift station. It is not known why an easement was not recorded with the project in the early 1970 ’s, but an easement should be recorded in favor of the City. Lift stations tend to emit odors on occasion. The property owners need to construct the house as far as reasonably possible from the street is to distance themselves from the structure. ft2336 Barbara and Collins Cav^nder 1393 1403 Rest Point Road Variances 2 23 00 Page A D. The lot has a very limited building pad. Any new construction on the property would require setback variances. Because Rest Point Road is narrow it is not possible to paric cars on the street without causing a public safety issue. Each lot along Rest Point Road will require off street parking areas to accommodate quests. The City Code requires all garages with doors facing a street to be located 30 feet from the property line to allow off street parking, thus requiring the house to be located further from the property line. ^2556 Barbara and Cclllns Cavtndir 1595/NOS Rest Point Road yartances 2/2300 Page 5 Submittal #1 January 19, 2000 Collins and Barbara Cavender 1405/1395 Rest Point Road Variances (Staff: Paul Weinberger) L ■ ^ | <1^11 ^ M F i ( Stttenwnt of Hardship Addsndum n 'l^ooO A. LotArsa: The legal combination of Lots 24 and 25 will provide 13,238 sq. ft (1/3 acre) of property. This does not meet the 1-acre minimum for this particular area. B. Lot Width: Unclear as to whether or not this ordinance applies to the property. 0 C. Hardcover 1. The lift station located on Lot 24 consumes 41 sq. ft of hardcover. We are asking for a credit of equal amount to compensate for this shared use on the property, reducing the proposed hardcover to 25.4%. 2. Due to the need for a wide radius where the drive meets the unusually narrow street, the hardcover calculations exceed the maximum 25% allowed. We are asking for a credit of 42 sq. ft. (the total amount necessary to accommodate the radii). Assuming the credit of 83 sq. ft. of hardcover, the proposed new residence will meet the 25% maximum hardcover regulations. D. Lot Coverage: We are requesting the amount of structure coverage be modified to include both the existing 1225 sq. ft. of Lot 25, plus 15% of the total area of Lot 24. This total, combining the existing structure on Lot 25, and 15% of Lot 24. equals 17.5% lot coverage. We are asking that 17.5% lot coverage be approved by the council, which will accommodate the proposed structure. E. Setback: The legal setback restrictions allow for 0 sq. ft. of buildable area on Lot 25. and 411 sq. ft. of buildable area on Lot 24. 1. We are requesting to encroach on the Lake side setback of 75’-0”. However, the forward most portion of the proposed structure is set back 4’-0* further from the lake than the average lakeshore line created by the forward most comers of the adjacent structures. 2. We are requesting to encroach on the Street side setback of 35'-0*. The forward most portion of the proposed structure encroaches of the setback line by 15'-6*. Please note the existing structure on Lot 25 does exceed the street side property line at three different locations. These three portions of the existing structure extend into the Rest Point Road right-of- way. ( Jan. i«i ^060 3. Ws believe this it the best placement of ttepfopoMd house given the ' shape and size of Lot 24 ai^ Lot 25 for three reasons: • To preserve our view, as wsN as that of our n^bors. • To allow a reasonable distance away from the sewer lift station. • To set back from the street and uti% lines as much as possible. Jan. 1^ guirrvoilrai ♦'I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY ■ »**r%»»* % • *• •• •• •* • : n- % I •. :% • *••• • • **v gn •••• • •• «• •• ••«««# 1l’-9 1/2 Jims MeNliL ansa t 9^9 9 Ofnmutci MAIN FLOOR PL AN - PROPOSED 1/0" r r-0" SlAJb^itn^ hn. M 2oo<^ MAN FLOOR: 22*2 ML FT. 4»5a PT. ^ I Jan- M,act>o Submittal #2 February 23, 2000 Collins and Barbara Cavender 1405/1395 Rest Point Road Variances (Staff: Paul Weinberger) 1 statement of Hardship Addendum #2 This addendum is a follow up to the planning commission meeting held on Wednesday, January 19“’, 2000. A. Lot Area: The legal combination of Lots 24 and 25 will provide 13,238 sq. ft. (1/3 acre) of property. This does not meet the 1-acre minimum for this particular area. B. Lot Width: Unclear as to whether or not this ordinance applies to the property. C. Hardcover: The proposed hardcover for the two combined lots is 3,112 sq. ft. (23.5%). This amount is 284 sq. ft. less than the previous submittal. In addition, we want to remind you that the city had previously recommended a 41 sq. ft. credit to compensate for the lift station located on Lot 24 (the new calculations do not include this credit). D. Lot Coverage: The structure has been reduced to meet the 15% structural coverage requirements. E. Setback: The legal setback restrictions allow for 0 sq. ft. of buildable area on Lot 25. and 411 sq. ft. of buildable area on Lot 24. 1. We are requesting to encroach on the Lake side setback of 75 -0". However, the forwarc . nost portion of the proposed structure is set back 8 -0" further from the lake than the average lakeshore line created by the forward most comers of the adjacent structures. This is 4 ’-0” further from the lake than the previous submittal. 2.We are requesting to encroach on the Street side setback of 35'-0*. The forward most portion of the proposed stn .:ture encroaches of the setback line by 13 ’-8". Please note the existing structure on Lot 25 does exceed the street side property line at three different locations. These three portions of the existing structure extend into the Rest Point Road right-of- way. 3.We believe this is the best placement of the proposed house given the shape and size of Lot 24 and Lot 25 for three reasons: ■ To preserve our view, as well as that of our neighbors. ■ To allow a reasonable distance away from the sewer lift station. ■ To set back from the street and utility lines as much as possible. ii \ Uf / { |i***«* §j*,«hct7 CUVATlOd*$S^|«*A( nS%i:ss;-x-2.5*^®* \''*!». l/i / > / \\ / f / fm— tM^9t n»III V'vyf ,l \ ^ V UUAL OCSCIUmON LaiJ«flrtL«lS! lka«paiCMiy. iirt^ll.llM^NALiMI t I r* (•" 004^IM I f^4*m I VfM 7 .< / '-•'''.*5 / / / :* -V VL /?;>0 HAMKXmJI CALClAJ^nOHS U«l4m«*int WUlkMiBMI Mtd »<•«««■ !!•• S (4 ««•• iMg ItfinM • r' ' TifJtBl,------ \ f«.#-tf $i*3tat ,,rf'»■«., / -—•a*. f / / KIM A.RCAUMC HCGitfCWO lAkO smivivoii in 4M nil in I7S lots fAX nMGMUM)UMi« ntMOAH MMAiav* lui li««ai MmM Ilf MAfiKiMt t fiMM IM If ^cn kiHl *1 Tim I l«*o««r Ml * WM«4M )*«^ S«Mlm| 10 IN MMl in MWi O) I •lMlmiUllV)4«) UilS iMt htfUM • If 4 Ull4MrfUlJ5«ljBM • iUJf i.in 1,114 M2% »«m 4irir »• 3t.■--A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY . \ • ' •••.!» . %• . «.• * *•? '•f . « .. .1 . • % i • - ‘s* *\ %M !•% \ 1 J«l »*s fVl ■ ‘ \\i> • • ► . , • \- I *« III * '••* I “f •.* '•NX I •»*. X ♦ I »^«'4 /i I' ♦•xi ,Tf /e- ;.^f nrn. M> i'«‘'27 « « ■.* • !•: - - ., — 0 4 '••«> .•• r«4 •••—> •»«*]« z'I ^. A -—^ •• ,j—/ ;‘>^-V.... -T * . *' .. /f. • \* l''^ • w .X C- »V „ W-1W L ama ■fl.. . /L iAMES McNEAL ARCMITCCTS m ttt r* «m rai •••> mm 2 0 0 0 CAVENDCR RCSIDCNCB Lj rnJ MAIN FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 1/8 “ s r-0“ SCALE: 1/8" = l'-0" FEBRUARY 2, 2<yjKfyA ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR (#11) #2556 BARBARA AND COLLINS CAVENDER, 1405/1395 REST POINT ROAD • VARIANCES, 11:00 p.m. -11:49 p.m. Barbara and Collins Cavender. Applicants, were present Weinberger stated the Applicants are proposing to remove an existing residence from a property located at 1405 Rest Point Road and combine the lot with a vacant lot located at 1395 Rest Point Road. Combined the two lots are 13,238 square feet, or .30 acre, with the lots being located in the LR>1B Distdct, which has a minimum of one acre zoning. The Applicants have requested various variances to permit constniction of a single family home on the property. Weinberger staled the Applicants are requesting a variance to permit a structure within 75' of the iakeshore. The Applicants have proposed to construct a new residence 30' from the lakeshore where 75' is required. Variances to hardcover are also required in the 0-75' setback and the 75*250' setback. The proposed residence also encroaches 13.63 feet into the front street setback. The Applicants are also requesting a variance to structural coverage. Weinberger noted the Applicants have been working with City Staff in an attempt to arrive at the best building pad for the proposed residence. Weinberger stated in order for the Applicants to comply with as many of the City reqjirements as possible, the proposed residence is situated in the best building site available for this lot. Weinberger stated the house wilt need to be raised one foot In order to be above the high water level. Most of the lot exists within 75' of Lake Minnetonka, so it should be assumed with development of this lot that some stnjcture and hardcover will be located within 75' of the lakeshore. The Applicants are requesting a variance to the amount of staictural.coverage normally allowed so they may include the aount of existing structural coverage on the developed lot located at 1405 Rest Point Road and 15 percent of the undeveloped lot at 1395 Rest Point Page 36 *: ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOI Road. The tola! structural coverage results In 17.4 percent, which is slightly above the 15 percent limit. Weinberger stated the property contains a lift station owned by the City of Orono. The property owners are being credited for 41 square feet of hardcover. Weinberger noted no utility easement has been granted for the lift station installed on the property. Weinberger indicated the City would like to work w»lh the property owners to obtain a utility easement. Weinberger indicated the previous owner of this vacant parcel had requested variances to permit new construction which included a number of variances. That application was reviewed in January. 1998, with the Planning Commission recommending denial based ori the size of the lot and lack of a sewer stub. The application was subsequently withdrawn by the Applicant and was not reviewed by the City Council. City Staff Is recommending approval of the variances for lot area to create a buildable lot Staff has concerns regarding the amount of total structural coverage on the property as the City of Orono has been consistent in requiring lots not to exceed 15 percent coverage. The total proposed coverage by the Applicant is 17.4 percent. The Applicant ’s rational for the coverage to exceed the Code requirement is replacement of existing coverage on the developed lot and 15 percent of the vacant lot. Weinberger stated if the application is approved, a condition of approval would be to have the lots combined Into one tax parcel prior to recording the variance on the chain of title. Mr. Cavender indicated they are attempting to construct a new house on the combined lots which will fit In with the neighborhood and add value to the neighborhood. Cavender noted the new residence will be located out of the right-of-way for Rest Point Road. Cavender stated the hardship they are experiencing with this property is the small lot size, which is limiting the number of options available for placement and size of the structure. Cavender stated the setback from the lake is consistent with the other structures located In this area. Page 37 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR Hawn commented the size of the lot really is not considered a hardship. Kluth stated the Applicants are close to the 15 percent structural coverage standard, and inquired whether the house could be downsized somewhat to meet the City's limit. Mrs. Cavender stated they have been working with their architect in an attempt to downsize the house. Bob Boyer, Building Contractor, stated an additional hardship for the Planning Commission to consider is the fact that the original structures in this a.^sa were built as cabins and not as year-round residences. Due to subsequent changes in the ordinances, hardships were created. Boyer stated the lots in this area will never be able to meet the setback requirements. Boyer stated they have attempted to limit L'le amount of structural coverage as well as the hardcover. Robert Bredeson, 1410 Rest Point Road, staled he has lived in this area for over 80 years. and all the homes in this area are all located within 25 to 30 feet of the lake and all have similar hardcover to what is being proposed tenighL. Bredeson commented the new residence will be constructed out of the right-of-way sr.d will complement the neighborhood. Bredeson noted the existing residence has not been well maintained. Bredeson stated he is in support of this project. Mrs. sJavender presented pictures to the Planning Commission of the existing residence. There were no further comments regardir.3 this application. Hawn commented in her view the proposed residence is an improvement over what currently exists. Hawn noted the City historically adheres to its 15 percent structural coverage limit as well as t^'c lb percent hardcover limit. Hawn stated due to the size of the lot, the proposed residence will not be able to meet the lakeshore setback. Hawn stated she would be reluctant to approve structural coverage over 15 percent. Smith commen. j J the Applicants clearly will not be able to comply with all of the City's requirements due to the size of the lot. Smith inquired whether the house could be Page 38 1 ■ ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FORI downsized somewhat In an effort to meet the 15 percent structural coverage limit Smith stated she prefers to see new construction at 15 percent or lower. Stoddard stated he is In agreement with the 15 percent structural coverage limit. Stoddard inquired what the total square footage of the house is. Becca Hein, Architect, noted the second floor of the house has not been designed at this time, but will be approximately the same as the first floor. Mrs. Cavender commented the second floor will not extend over the entire first floor. Stoddard noted the footprint of the proposed residence is 2.300 square feet. Smith inquired how close to the lake the residence Is proposed to be located. Mr. Cavender stated they would like to construct the house approximately 30 feet from the lake. Smith questioned whether the location of the residence could be moved further back from the lake. Kluth commented he personally does not have a problem with the setback, but noted he does have a concern regarding the total structural coverage being proposed for this lot. Nygard commented he would like to see the hardcover within the 0-75* setback minimized as much as possible. Hawn noted this lot is relatively flat and would not require a stairway dovm to the lake Hawn noted for the record that a letter of support has been received by the City from David Williams, 1400 Rest Point Road; Clarisse Johnson, 1398 Rest Point Road; and Pat Walsh. 1390 Rest Point Road. Mr. Cavender stated the City will receive a benefit by having the new residence being located out of the City's right-of-way. Mrs. Cavender stated their purchase agreement is contingent upon approval of their application. Smith Inquired whether the Applicants would be able to downsize the structure. Page 39 i ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOI Mrs. Cavender commented if they are required to redesign their plan, it would require a significant amount of work. C&vender noted the proposed garage for the residence is not oversized. Hawn inquired whether the house could be located closer to the road. Mrs. Cavender stated they will not be able to meet the setback requirements. Cavender indicated there are utility poles and a lift station located in the front yard, which necessitates the house being located a little further back. Boyer stated due to the narrowness of Rest Point Road and the lack of parking available on the street, the house and garage need to be located furtier back to accommodate a car in the driveway. Stoddard commented he would be willing to approve a variance to the front yard setback. but that the Applicants need to comply with the 15 percent structural coverage limit. Stoddard suggested this application be tabled to allow the Applicant time to revise his plans. Stoddard stated the Applicant probably will not be allowed to construct a patio or walkway to the lake. Mrs. Cavender stated the patio is located off to the side. Nygard noted the patio is still located within the 0-75' setback. Smith recommended the Applicants attempt to adhere to the 15 percent structural coverage limit and relocate the house closer to the road. Kluth indicated the number one Issue is the structural coverage, with the 15 percent needing to be complied with. Kluth stated he would like to see the hardcover under the 25 percent limit as well due to environmental concerns. Kluth noted the 0-75* setback is the most critical as it relates to hardcover due to the impact to the lake. Hawn stated it appears the Planning Commission would like the Applicants to adhere to the 15 percent structural coverage limit. Hawn inquired whether the Applicants would be willing to extend the 60 day review period should the Planning Commission table this application. Page 40 e ORONO PLANNINO COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR Weinberger indicated City Staff will continue to work with the Applicants. Stoddard commented the front yard setback should be compatible with the other houses In the neighborhood, and suggested the Applicants consider locating the house 35 feet from the lake. Smith commented she would like to see the house 35 to 40 feet from the lake. Stoddard Inquired whether the Appiicants would like the Planning Commission to table their application. Mr. Cal ender requested their application be tabled. Stoddard moved, Kluth seconded, to table Application #2556, Barbara and Collins Cavender, 1405/1395 Rest Point Road, Variances, to allow the Applicants time to revise their plans, and to extend the 60 day review period. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#12) #2567 JUDITH AND DANIEL MCATHIE, 1449 BAY RIDGE ROAD - VARIANCES, 11:50 p.m. -11:56 p.m. Judith and Daniel McAthie, Applicants, were present. Bottenberg stated the Applicants are requesting variances to permit the addition of a garage and living space to the existing residence. They are proposing to raise the roof of the existing structure for additional living space on the second story. The Applicants are also proposing to enlarge the garage by approximately 350 square feet and reducing the size of the tum*around in the driveway. Bottenberg noted the amount of hardcover in the 75-250* setback will be reduced by 495.5 square feet, or 2.43 percent, for a total hardcover In the amount of 5,745.5 square feet or 28.27 percent. Bottenberg stated the amount of structural coverage is below the allowable limit. Bottenberg stated the residence was constructed at its present location in 1967, and now requires variances for side yard setback and average lakeshore setback. The Applicants Page 41 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR0mmmimm are requesting a variance for the second story addition to encroach 20 feet into the average lakeshore setback and a variance to permit a 10.62' setback to the north property line and a 9.93* setback to the south property line where 30' setback is required. City Staff is recommending approval of variances for side yard setback, average lakeshore setback and hardcover in the 75-250' setback area. Hawn inquired whether a variance to height is required on this application Bottenberg stated the height of the proposed structure is not an Issue. Mr. McAthie stated they are looking to update their residence. McAthie stated their neighbors are in support of this project. Bottenberg commented City Staff has received a phone from Michael Johnson, 1461 Bay Ridge Road and Kent Whitworth, 1425 Bay Ridge Road, indicating their support of this project. There were no public comments. Kluth inquired where the hardcover was being reduced. Mr. McAthie stated they removing some decking and a sidewalk located in the front. Kluth moved, Hawn seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2557, Judith and Daniel McAthie, 1449 Bay Ridge Road, granting of variances to side yard setback, average lakeshore setback, and hardcover in the 75-250* setback area to permit the addition of a garage and living space to the existing residence. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#13) #2558 ANTHONY PATTERSON, 1780 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES, 11:57 p.m. -12:23 p.m. Anthony Patterson, Applicant, was present, along with David Eerkman, Property Manager. Bottenberg stated the Applicants are proposing to construct additional living space to the existing residence, replacing an existing Jeck, and replacing an existing side entrance with a slightly larger entrance. Presently the house is a one and a half story residence that will Page 42 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:January 7,2000 SUBJECT: #2556 Barbara and Collins Cavender 1395/1405 Rest Point Road Variances-Public Hearing _____ Zoning District: LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area:13,238 combined square feet (.30 acre) List of Exhibits: A B C D E F G H I. Application Statement of Hardship Plat Map Existing Site Plan/Survey Proposed Site Plan/Survey Lakeside Elevation View Streetside Elevation View Floor Plan Property Owners List Application: The applicants have proposed to remove an existing residence from a property located at 1405 Rest Point Road and combine the lot with a vacant lot located at 1395 Rest Point Road. Combined the two lots are 13,238 square feet (.30 acre) in the LR-IB (1 acre zoning district). The applicants have requested variances to permit construction of a single family home on the property. Lot History: The previous property owner of the vacant parcel had requested variances to permit new construction which included lakeshore setback, lot area, lot width, hardcover and structure the application was reviewed by the Planning Commission in January, 1998 and reconunended for denial based on the size of the lot and lack of a sewer stub. The application was withdrawn by the applicant and was not reviewed by the City Council. *This was only for the vacant parcel not the developed parcel. ^2556 Barbara and Collins Cavender 1395'1405 Rest Point Road Variances I 1900 Page I ■ lUite AAAa .-lO* This application requires the following variances: 1.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) and (B) to permit structure within 75' of the lakeshore. The applicants have proposed to construct a new residence 30 ’ from the lakeshore where 75' is required. 2. Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit structure and hardcover within 75' of the lakeshore. 3. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (1) to permit 2,406 s.f (25.3%) hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback where 1,546 s.f. (13.6%) exists and no hardcover is allowed. 4.Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit a new residence to be constructed within the 35' street setback. The proposed residence encroaches 13.63' into the setback. To permit a new residence to be constructed on a lot less than 1 acre in size in the LR-IB zoning district. 5.Section 10.03, Subdivision 14(C) to permit 2,298 square feet (17.4%) structure where 1,171 square feet (8.8%) exists and 1,985.7 square feet (15%) is allowed. ANALYSIS Lot Area and Yards LR-IC Lot Area Lot Width Lakeshore Side Yard Street Yard Required 43,560 s.f.140’IS'10'35’ Existing 13,238 s.f.124'41’3.5'0’ Proposed 13,238 s.f 124’31’10'21.37' The subject lot is 0.3 acre where 1.0 acre is required for new construction. Variances are required for lakeshore setback, front yard setback and lot area to permit new construction. a2536 Barbara and Collins Cavender 1395 N05 Rest Point Road Variances 1/19 00 Page 2 Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 13,238 s.f.Existing: 1,171 s.f Proposed: 2,298 s.f 8.8% 17.4% The applicants request the amount of structural coverage be granted a variance to include the amount of existing structural coverage on the developed lot (1405 Rest Point Road) and 15% of the undeveloped lot (1395 Rest Point Road). The coverage results in structure of 2,298 s.f (17.4%). Hardcover Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Existing Hardcover Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Variance Requested 0'-75'9,507 s.f 1,546 s.f (16.3%) none (0%) 2,406 s.f (25.3%) ' To permit new construction 75’-250'3,731 s.f 507 s.f (13.6%) 126.75 s.f (25%) 716 s.f (19.1%) none The property has been previously developed prior to the adoption of the current zoning ordinance and by reviewing existing and proposed site plans it is clear there is only a small legal building pad on the property. Most of the lot exists within 75' of Lake Minnetonka so it should be assumed to develop the lot some structure and hardcover would be located within 75' of the lakeshore. The hardcover calculation does not include hardcover that is located on the property for a lift station. The lot has been credited for the 41 square feet of hardcover. *No utility easement has been granted for the lift station installed on the property. *2556 Barbara and Collins Cavender 1 395/1405 Rest Point Road t dnances I 19 00 Page3 Variance STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP Applicant's hardship is included with Exhibit A. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variances for lot area to create a buildable lot. Staff is concerned about the total structure on the property as the City of Orono has been consistent in requiring lots not to exceed 15% coverage. The total proposed coverage by the applicant is 17.4%. The rational for the coverage to exceed the Code requirement is replacement of existing coverage on the developed lot and 15% of the vacant lot. Should the Planning Commission recommend approval of the variances it should be a condition of approval the lots be combined into one tax parcel prior to recording the variance on the chain of title. H2556 Barbara and Collins Cavtnder 1 395 '1 405 Rest Point Road Variances I'1 9.00 Page A A Application #Z5S0> CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Date ReceKed Amount Paid PROPERTY INFORMATION , . Site Address / IHOS" KoivtT vo^JI Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 07-//7-23 3*$ OOO^_______________ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired / ^53 _(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: ___^residential ___^odier (specify) Zoning District: ^ ^ ^_______________________ APPLICANTS Namex //, n *i£4~ O <K\JenJ-€jT Addres^^^Ps" Lli.xde^t.r4> OWNER Name r(tf-different thaiuanplic: Phone (home) 60 - ____ Phone (work ) ~ c 2. tf City: aW Zip: r^v*// Phone (home)______________ Phone (work)_______________I Address: t*fto 7?^xr-7^o>City:.Zip:.©IDESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: __ Estimated Construction Cost $ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED X Lot Area Lot Width Setback: Front __Other (specify)_____ Side X Hardcover X Rear V Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:_____5«-r .i______________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) 1 statement of Hardship Addendum A. Lot Area: The legal combination of Lots 24 and 25 will provide 13,238 sq. ft. (1/3 acre) of property. This does not meet the 1-acre minimum for this particular area B. Lot Width: Unclear as to whether or not this ordinance applies to the property. C. Hardcover: 1. The lift station located on Lot 24 consumes 41 sq. ft. of hardcover. We are asking for a credit of equal amount to compensate for this shared use on the property, reducing the proposed hardcover to 25.4%. 2. Due to the need for a wide radius where the drive meets the unusually narrow street, the hardcover calculations exceed the maximum 25% allowed. We are asking for a credit of 42 sq. ft. (the total amount necessary to accommodate the radii). Assuming the credit of 83 sq. ft. of hardcover, the proposed new residence v\nll meet the 25% maximum hardcover regulations. D. Lot Coverage: We are requesting the amount of structure coverage be modified to include both the existing 1225 sq. ft. of Lot 25, plus 15% of the total area of Lot 24. This total, combining the existing structure on Lot 25, and 15% of Lot 24, equals 17.5% lot coverage. We are asking that 17.5% lot coverage be approved by the council, which will accommodate the proposed structure. E. Setback: The legal setback restrictions allow for 0 sq. ft. of buildable area on Lot 25, and 411 sq. ft. of buildable area on Lot 24. 1. We are requesting to encroach on the Lake side setback of 75’-0". However, the fonA^ard most portion of the proposed structure is set back 4’-0" further from the lake than the average lakeshore line created by the forward most comers of the adjacent structures. We are requesting to encroach on the Street side setback of 35’-0". The forward most portion of the proposed structure encroaches of the setback line by 15’-6". Please note the existing structure on Lot 25 does exceed the street side property line at three different locations. These three portions of the existing structure extend into the Rest Point Road right-of- way. .V __c ] 3. We believe this is the best placement of the proposed house given the shape and size of Lot 24 and Lot 25 for three reasons: ■ To preserve our view, as well as that of our neighbors. ■ To allow a reasonable distance away from the sewer lift station. ■ To set back from the street and utility lines as much as possible. 1:0 ::.) C ^ / • ■.i / V- •* t Vi. •WL» ii o 7- th7^A3 f- O • / f ^ ' r*' »w . ’ ^ ■A■■: ■;n ' '■ "• Sp ^^'1.13 **:j ZAn I •/’. '■ rTMTSHTii |M mM n ' IU '■■ '< • |) fl 1 - ii f \1M ■■]>■■. lii^' Ts-^ T- .^^1 n 'Wn •. i< • • # ‘, .» * X. y.- V »J'.^'‘ ' *T '' i A-. .-a - \J^ gU^VAf|g>h____ I-n If i *»**" ■■ • ■■ ••• • '-•' v-;v:SK;r':'w§!SS ‘^^p.&e-r gu-v»ri<7t~<O I I 9^9 9 atiKpa f t • ^ ). i o ■>i MAIN FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 1/;^" : r-0" RUN DATE 12/E8/99 MTCN 5t2 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PX4S5A8I PAOE 5 PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAfK/AOOR PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR Sa f7-iI7-2S S2 •tS7 •1375 REST POINT RD N D t L K CERLICHER HICNAEL B I LYNNE 6ERLICHER 1375 REST POINT RD HOUND HN 5535A 30 •7-117-23 32 t039 •135« REST POINT RD L t S 6RADILL LARRY B SHARON GRABILL 1S5B REST POINT RD HOUND HN 553M 38 B7-117-2S 33 BBBl OIBIB REST POINT RD ROBERT 0 BREDESON ROBERT G BREDESON 15 E ST ALBANS RD HOPKINS HN 55SB5 SB BT-llT-ES S3 •1408 REST POINT RD DAVID A WILLIAHS ETAL DAVID A WILLIAHS 1400 REST POINT RD HOUND NN 55344 SB 07-117-23 S3 0003 01404 REST POINT RD L R NORN B H NORN LESTER R B NYRTLE HORN 1404 REST POINT RD HOUND NN 55344 SB 07-117-23 33 0004 01S9B REST POINT RD L K JOHNSON BCD JOHNSON LYLE K JOHNSON 2737 IRVING AVE SO HPLS NN 5540B SB 07-117-23 S3 0005 01304 REST POINT RD P B N WALSH PATRICK J WALSH 1300 REST POINT RD NN 55344 SB 07-117-23 S3 0004 013B4 REST POINT RD J T NY6ARD B K N NY6ARD J T NYGARD B K N NYGARD 1384 REST POINT RD HOUND NN 55344 38 07-117-23 33 0007 013B0 REST POINT RD DAVID K BLOOGEiT DAVID K BLODGETT 1380 REST POINT RD HOUND NN 55344 ■a1 SB 07-117-23 S3 0000 01305 REST POINT RD ROBERT 0 BREDESON ROBERT 6 BREDESON 15 E ST ALBANS RD HOPKINS NN 55305 38 07-117-23 33 0010 01405 REST POINT RD C CAVENDER B B CAVENDER COLLINS CAVENDER B BARBARA CAVENDER 1405 REST POINT RD HOUND NN 55344 SB 07-117-23 S3 0011 01SB5 REST POINT RD D W B J L RAHN DAVID W B JODI L RAHN 13B5 REST POINT RD HOUND NN 55344 TOTAL BATCH 502 00012 ^1^ J a i)/. • INCIL MAR \ 3 2UUU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION wlTY OF On DATE: March 13. 2000 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: 2000 Season Park Mowing We have obtained quotations for park mowing for the 2000 season. Requests for quotations were sent to six area firms. Quotations were received from two firms Lawn Detailers, Medina Minnesota $15,225 Shaughnessy U vn Services, Orono Minnesota $ 13,900 We have checked references for Shaugnessy Lawn Service, and the reference check was positive. This firm has been completing park mowing for the City of Long Lake for the past several years. We are recommending accepting the quotation from Shaugnessy Lawn Service for the 2000 season park mowing. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to accept quotation from Shaughnessy Lawn Service, Orono Minnesota for the 2000 season, park mowing in the amount of $13,900. cm IMOL MAR 1 3 2000 : CU Y Uf REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 13, 2000 ITEM NO.= 7 Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Repon Item Description: Purchase of Fuel Tank for Golf Course The 2000 Golf Course Capital Budget included $20,000 for replacement of the existing above ground fuel storage tanks at the golf course. These older tanks are not in compliance with the new tank regulations. We have obtained quotations for an above ground dual compartment 500/500 gallon concrete vaulted tank. Westside Equipment Inc. Determan Brownie Inc. $19,170 $19,406 We are recommending purchase of the tank from Westside Equipment Inc. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to accept quotation from Westside Equipment for a 500/500 gallon dual compartment concrete vaulted fuel storage tank in the amount of $19,170. COUNCIL MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MAR 1 3 2000 CHY 0^ DATE: March 10,2000 ITEM NO: J Department Approval: Name Ron Moorsc Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Scheduling of Work Session and Offsite Council Workshop Council Work Session(sl The following are topics for upcoming Council work session(s); 1. Policies related to on-site septic systems in relation to new legislation, 2. A long-term trunk sewer contingency plan. 3.Policy issues regarding Parks, Trails and Open Space to guide the update of the Park’s element of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Police Chief hiring process. Offsite Council Workshop The Council has agreed to meet in an offsite workshop with a consultant to develop an understanding and agreement about how the Council can function most effectively, and how the Council and City Administrator can work together most effectively. The Council has also agreed that a Friday/Saturday workshop format would best facilitate the purpose of the workshop. To ensure the workshop is as effective as possible, I have contacted a leading municipal governance consultant to facilitate the workshop. The consultant is Carl Neu. Carl Neu has worked with cities around the country, including a number of cities in the metro area. Carl has two Friday/Saturday dates available in April. They are April 14 and 15 and April 28 and 29. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Motion to select a date(s) and time(s) for Council work session(s). 2. Motion to select a set of dates for an offsite Council workshop. COUNCIL MEETING MAR 1 3 2000 CITY Oh Unv->i<v^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 10,2000 ITEM NO: Department Approval Administrator Reviewed: Name Tom Kuehn ' kk? Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Title Finance Director Report Item Description: 2000 Liability Insurance Policy and Worker Compensation Insurance Policy Premium Tabulation and Award Recommendations, with Resolution to Not Waive the Statutory Tort Limits for Liability Insurance Attachments: (1) Liability and Worker Compensation Insurance Premiums Tabulation (2) Worker Compensation Plan Estimated 2000 Premium Quotation (3) Resolution Not to Waive the Statutory Tort Limits for Liability Insurance A comparative tabulation of the 1999 actual and 2000 renewal insurance premiums, and the 2000 budgeted amounts is presented for your review. At this time we are recommending award of all the policies as presented. The City will continue to carry an umbrella excess liability policy of $2 million and will not waive the statutory limits established under Minnesota law. The LMCIT has specifically requested that Council adopt a resolution stipulating whether the City will or will not waive the statutory limits under the law, so we have included a resolution this year. The estimated cost for all policies and the agent of record for 2000 is $ 1 48,984 compared to $ 131 ,105 for 1999, and $ 131,011 for 1998. The City will place all coverage with the LMCIT program. Worker Compensation Coverage; The renewal premium quotation for worker compensation insurance reflects a gross initial premium for 2000 of $45,973, which is reduced by our experience modification of .82 and a premium discount of 6.76%, resulting in a net initial premium of $34,592. This is an increase of $6,312, or 22.32% more than the 1999 initial premium. The base rate for all classifications was unchanged from last year, however, the total estimated payroll increased $99,600, and the experience modification increased from .71 in 1999 to .82 in 2000, resulting in the net premium increase. March 10,2000 2000 Insurance Policy and Worker Compensation Insurance Policy Premium Tabulation and Award Recommendations, page 2 The payroll increase is due to additional full time police officers, the adjustment of public works maintenance position wages, and scheduled wage adjustments for the city staff as a whole. The experience modification increase reflects an increase in the number and severity of worker compensation claims. Liability Insurance Package Policy and Excess Liability The package policy and excess liability policy premiums total $ 107,192 for 2000, compared to $95,625 for 1999, and $97,370 for 1998. The increase from 1999 to 2000 is $11,567, or 12.1%. The premium increase is comprised of property value adjustments to offset inflation; a 5% rate increase for vehicle coverage; the addition of two vehicles; and the City’s overall municipal loss experience. Public officials liability increased due to higher loss experience, including two land use claims which had very high defense costs. As the City’s loss experience is averaged over a three year period it is expected we will continue to incur higher premium costs for the next two years. Staff recommends the award of the 2000 insurance coverage as presented in the attachment and the adoption of the attached resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: (1) Award of the 2000 insurance package effective January 1, 2000 to the League of Miimesota Cities Insurance Trust for the worker compensation coverage, $34,592; for the comprehensive municipal property and casualty package, $83,830; for the umbrella excess liability, $18,848; for the petrofund reimbursement, $595; for the open meeting law, $939; for the boiler and machinery, $1,585; for the surety bonds, $780; and for the golf course liquor liability, $625. (2) Adopt Resolution No Insurance Purposes. , To Not Waive The Statutory Tort Limits For Liability WP\VIN60\WPDOCS\TOMUOOOIniTib.wpd PREMIUM SUMMARY 1999 2000 PROPERTY 8,780 9,558 INLAND MARINE 1,835 1,882 LIABILITY/E&O 51,882 58,656 AUTO LIABILITY 6,503 9,075 AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE 3,758 4,649 CRIME 404 Included PETROFUND 595 595 EMPLOYEE DISHONESTY 833 780 BOILER & MACHINERY 1,412 1,585 LIQUOR LIABILITY 625 625 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 28,280 34,592 EXCESS LIABILITY 18,273 18,848 OPEN MEETING LAW 725 939 TOTALS 123,905 141,784 Refundable Commissions; Workers Compensation 2% Direct Reimbursement League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Group Self-Insured Workers* Compensation Plan 145 University Avenue West St Paul. MN 55103-2044 Phone (651) 215-4173 Self-Insured Workers’ Compensation Quotation (RENEWAL of Agreement No. 0E-000362-1A) DRONC 01/01/SOOO 01/01/2001 STREET CONSTRUCTION L MAINTENANCE WATERWORKS POLICE CLERICAL POLICE RESERVES MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ELECTED OR APPOINTED OFFICIALS ANIMAL CONTROL CLUB-COUNTRY/GOLF CODE RATE ESTIMATED PAYROLL DEPOSIT PREMIUM 5506 4.00 30400u.12160. 7520 2.81 40000.1124. 7720 2.74 902000.24715. 8810 0.43 346500.1490. 7722 3.42 41300.1412. 9^j10 0.86 402000.3457. 9411 0.33 18200.60. 8831 1.62 30200.489. 9060 1.48 72000.1066. Manual Premium 45973. Experience Modification 0.82 Standard Premium Managed Care Credit OK Deductible Credit 0/> Premium Discount Discounted Standard Premium LMC Insurance Trust Discount 0*/. Net Deposit Premium 37698. 0. 0. 3106. 3A592. 0. 3A592. The foregoing quotation is for a deposit premium based on your estimate of payroll. Your final actual premium will be computed after an audit of payroll subsequent to the close of your agreement year and will be subject to revisions in rates, payrolls and experience modification. While you are a member of the LMCrr Workers* Compensation Plan, you will be eligible to participate in distributions from the Trust based upon claims experience and earnings of the Trust If you desire the coverage offered above, please complete the enclosed **Notice of Premium Options’* and return it and your check for the deposit premium (made payable to the LMCIT) to: Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC PO Box 581517 Minneapolis, MN 55458-1517 LM 4410(8/99) I A RESOLUTION MAKING A SELECTION NOT TO WAIVE THE STATUTORY TORT LIMITS FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE PURPOSES WHEREAS, pursuant to previous action taken, the League of Minnesota Cities Insur ance Trust has asked the City to make an election with regards to waiving or not waiving its tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04; and WHEREAS, the choices available are as follows: to not waive the statutory tort limit, to waive the limit but to keep insurance coverage at the statutory limit, and to waive the limit and to add insurance to a new level; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby elect not to waive the statutory tort liability limit established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held March 13,2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabbriel Jabbour, Mayor WPWINM\WPOOCSVTOMMasRfs20(m.«|>d ^ • COUNCIL MEETING HAR 1 3 2000 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 8,2000 CITY ITEM NO: / 0 Department Approval: Name RonMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Report Item Description: Community Endo\\ment Fund At a recent work session, the Council discussed options for best managing the use of funds in the City’s Building Outlay Fund, once the bonds used to finance the City facilities are fully paid in 2007. The Council directed staff to obtain information regarding an endowment type fund that has been created by the City of Minnetonka. Information regarding this fund, which is called the Community Investment Fund is attached. The key element in how this fund is used is that over the long term the principal amount in the fund continues to grow, and annual expenditures from the fund are generally limited to the amount of the interest earned in the fund. This ensures the fund will continue to be available as a funding source for priority community projects over the long term. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion regarding follow-up by staff in relation to a Community Endowment Fund. 'FEB-14-2000 09:24 MU^NETOMKA LEGFiL DEPT.6129399248 P.02'08 1210.00 ) ) „ . (added 4/24/89Section 1210 ~ Coirenunity Investment Fund Ord. 89-553) 1210.00. Fund Created. There is hereby created a separate fund to be designated as the Community Investment Fund. This fund shall be maintained in the official city records and administered by the Treasurer in accordance with the provisions of this section. All surplus moneys in each separate improvement fund in the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund which remain after the costs of each improvement have been fully funded# and which are not transferred to another separate improvement ^'ind, shall be transferred to the Community investment Fund. In addition, the following shall be deposited in this fund: (a) All collections of special assessments and taxes levied for the payment of the costs of an improve ment which are received after the improvement costs have been fully funded, (b) Investment earnings generated by the moneys in the Community Investment Fund# and (c) Any other moneys appropriated by the Council or donated for the purposes of the fund. The principal of tha fund shall consist of all transfers from the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund, subsequent collections of special assessments and taxes, and other moneys appropriated or donated to the fund. In addition, the principal shall be increased annually by an amount equal to ten percent of the investment earnings generated by the fund in the previous year. The remaining investment earnings shall not accrue to the principal and shall forever be treated as investment earnings available for expenditure in accordaince with this section. 1210.05. Purpose of Fund. This fund shall be used solely to pay the capital costs of projects of general benefit to the City of Minnetonka. 1210.10. Expenditure Limitations. (a) Expenditures from the fund shall be made solely from accumulated investment earnings until 1993. In 1993 and beyond, expenditures shall be made only from accumulated investment earnings whenever possible. (b) Expenditures may be made from principal, but may not exceed an amount greater than the equivalent of the fund's investment earnings for the prior two consecutive years. Z£ expenditures from principal are mada, either they must be structured as a loan to rapay the principal, or no further expenditures of any kind may be made from the fund until investment earnings have raastablished the - 338C - FEB-14-2Q00 09:24 MIMMETONKA LEGAL E€PT.612939S243 P.03 03 1210.15 principal at an amount aqual to that existing before the expenditures plus ten percent of the investment earnings that would have been earned per year if the principal had not been reduced. 1210.15. Funding Preference. Expenditures from the fund for competing projects shall be granted in the following order of preference: (a) First Priority: Projects which can be funded within . the amount of the available investment earnings. (b) Second Priority; Projects using expenditures from principal funds which have the capacity to repay the principal amount borrowed. (c) Third priority; Projects using expenditures from principal funds which have no other reasonable funding sourcef are non-revenue producing#-require significant funding# and will provide otherwise unattainable community benefit. 1210.20. Funding Procedure. Expenditures from the fund may be made only after con^lianee with the following procedure: (a) The project to be funded must have been included for at least two years in the city's formally-adopted capital improvement program. (b) The City Council must hold a public hearing on whether the proposed project should be funded. Notice specifying the date# time and place of the hearing# the project to be funded# and the amount of funding must be published at least ten days before the hearing in the city's official newspaper. In addition# efforts shall be made to give notice to the community through other reasonable means# such as newspaper articles# cable television and any city newsletter. The public hearing must be held on two separate days at least 30 days apart. The date and time of the second meeting shall be announced at the first. (c) The City Council must make the following findings which shall be incorporated into an adopted resolution: • • •• • . • . . (1) The project has sufficient community-wide benefit as determined by a review of its intended users# the degree to which it addresses a community-wide need or problem# and its consistency with other city goals# programs or policies. (2) The project to be funded could not occur but for the use of the Community Investment Fund. (3) The Community Investment Fund is not replacing funding from another previously programmed or available source. (4) The project has been included in at least two * FEB-14-2 mvi 09:24 MINNETCh-k4 LEuP-L DEPT.6129398248 P.04/06 1210.25 (5) (6) ^o«“ally^approved capital improvament ^sed, the project has the ability to reasonably repay the funds, and use of the princiLl does not exceed the equivalent of the last two yearS^^ investment earnings from the Community Investment Fund. An estimate of the ongoing annual operating and costs has been made and the source (s) for paying such costs identified. (d) ) aL in paragraph (c) cannot be made in^SeeliSf expenditure limitations imposed oniy 5*^ *** ^*>e fundvote of at least five Council for the administration of the ComS5^?trinveVS»^nt ISd?*“ *«i-«x^r;ste'srar j:s?"fiv^^^“,s2s ‘’of'“:s: V ; «• - YEAR TRANSFER FROM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUND CITY OF MINNETONKA COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND FUND BALANCE TEN PERCENT NINETY PERCENT INTEREST TO MTBtEST TO APPROPFiATED UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BAl ANCE FUND BALANCE EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATED UNAPPROPRIATEO FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE *nmto I I s 198S 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 199S 1997 1998 1999 TOTAL HIM) 2.800 2.200 4.00 2.00 2.00 1,00 000 0 0 0 0 $S.620 45.431 66.327 88.798 84.147 91.523 123^0 123,172 119.844 110.593 108.807 $50,583 408.876 596,947 799,184 757.323 823,707 1,110,865 1,108.548 1.078.592 995.336 961.267 $18,000,$965,692 $8691.228 $0 0 0 0 0 0 1669.618 1617.078 2,982.759 1.070687 376607 H005620 66S1.051 9.117,378 13606,176 15,290623 17.381646 18605676 18628.448 18,748692 18.858685 18.965.692 $7616.149 $18.965.692 $50683 459680 1686606 1655600 2612613 3636620 3,177687 2650637 965,170 888610 1675679 $1675.079 mlsekinial.tirb2 u CO 51 PROJECT UNDBERGH CENTER WILLISTON CENTER ICEARBIA SHADY OAK BEACH CULTURAL ARTS ntocteMtKp.wb2 -H O u AMOUNT AUTHORIZED $2,182,600 1,2 2, 1r 2,440 I <1111 JIM r $9,422.1 CITY OF MINNETONKA COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND expenditures PRIOR EXPENDED $1,979,600 621,366 185,730 0 0 $2,786,696 EXPENDED $203,000 578.634 2,080,175 112,950 $2,982,759 3 xr aaa sa xsa 1998 EXPENDED $0 0 126,095 944.592 0 $1,070,687 1999 EXPENDED $0 0 0 85,802 290,205 $376,007 PROJECT BALANCE $0 0 0 56,656 2.149.705 $2,286A61 nm CO I 3 • • Di I i;; & 3 \ 3 ' ■ MCIL MEET ,AR 1 3 200U wilY OF On^iw REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 9,2000 ITEM NO: I Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Participation in a Process to Develop Design Guidelines for Commercial Development Along Highway 12 The City of Long Lake is ready to begin work with a planning consultant to develop a set of design guidelines and a master plan for the development of commercial areas in Long Lake. Because the commercial areas of Long Lake and Orono are closely interrelated, the City of Long Lake has invited Orono to participate in the commercial area planning process to enable the commercial areas in the two Cities to have common design standards and a shared character of development. A letter from the City of Long Lake and a copy of the proposal from the planning consultant is attached. The cost of the project is $20,000. Although the City of Long Lake would appreciate some financial participation by the City of Orono, Orono’s participation in the project is not contingent upon its financial participation. The City of Long Lake has requested that Mn/DOT fund this project since the need to replan the Long Lake commercial area is directly related to the new Highway 12 project. From staffs standpoint, it is certainly reasonable for the City’s financial participation to include the following elements: • Planning regarding the character of old Highway 12 and street scape enhancements on old Highway 12. • Design guidelines for buildings and sites adjacent to Highway 12. Several other elements of the project impact Orono although they may not relate directly to properties in Orono. Staff recommends the City participate in the project. Participation from the City could include a staff member, a Planning Commission member, a Council member, and a representative from Orono’s Highway 12 business community. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion regarding the City’s participation with the City of Long Lake in a project to develop a set of design guidelines, and a master plan, for the development of commercial areas in Long Lake and along Highway 12. CITY OF LONG LAKE Mayor Gabriel Jabbour City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Honorable Mayor Jabbour: « V % -J MAR 0 9 2GC0 Cl TV OF OriOi\'0 March 7,2000 The City of Long Lake previously imposed a one-year moratorium on new development in commercial areas. Since that time the Long Lake Planning Commission has been actively involved in creating a development plan for these areas to guide development once the moratorium is lifted in September of this year. It is the intent of the Long Lake Planning Commission to work with Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. to develop design guidelines and a master plan for the development of commercial areas in Long Lake. It is anticipated that this project will start in April and last approximately 5 months. The project will cost $20,000.00. The City Council of Long Lake has asked me to encourage you to appoint at least two Orono residents to participate in this project. The Long Lake City Council recognizes the significant time commitment involved, but feels a project team that represents the service area of downtown Long Lake will better serve the community. The Planning Commission and the City Council of Long Lake have both indicated the importance of citizen participation in this process by the City of Orono. As stated previously, the cost of this project is $20,000.00. This represents a significant unbudgeted expenditure for the City of Long Lake. Any consideration given by the City of Orono for financial participation in this project will be tremendously appreciated. The requested citizen representation is by no means contingent upon the City of Orono’s financial participation. Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. If I can be of any assistance in answering questions regarding this project, please contact me at your convenience. I have enclosed a copy of the Hoisington proposal for your review. Sincerely, ion Sweei City Administrator cc: Ron Moorse, Orono City Administrator 1964 Park Avenue • Long-ake. Minnesota 55356 • 612-473-6961 612-476-9622 (fax) r.. Proposal City of Long Lake, Minnesota Development of Design Guidelines 14 January 2000 I I J Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota SS401 ph. 612.338.0800 • fx. 612.338.6838 H K 3 Creative Solutions for Land Planning aod Design Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.HK 3 14 January 2000 Ms. Jennifer Chaput, City Planner City of Long Lake 1964 Park Avenue Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 RE; Proposal for Design Guidelines and Downtown Master Plan Dear Ms. Chaput: Commission to forge a vision for the Long Lake community and to devise structures that encourage development to re^h toward that vision. It seems that Long Lake has all the qualities of a great small town, and we look forward to the opportunity to continue shaping its future and protecting its character. HKGi has performed numerous downtown master planning and redevelopment planning studies for cities m Minnesota and across the country. A central feature of these plans is the ability to control the form of development - guiding development toward a vision framed by the community. The underlying issue is recognition of the special character of the place, and generating guidelines or standards that build identity from that character. We know that Long Lake is a special place; we have crafted a work program that allows for the city and the community to share in keeping it that way - even as the community grows. We also have a great deal of experience in other areas that may be central to the work. HKGi has prepared stree^ape piMs and concepts for the development of public spaces for cities and towns across the country. Within the last year, HKGi has worked with a small town in Connecticut to restore its histone green; we developed a streetscape and public space framework for Milledgeville, Georgia, one of only two planned capital cities in the United States; and we developed a concept for revitalizing the downtown lakefront in Branson, Missouri. As with those communities, HKGi’s goal is to help the Long L^e community discover its unique qualities, so that =t can move forward in the face of the significant c ange that it faces with assurance that it will not lose those qualities that make it attractive as a town. We look forward to meeting with you to discuss our proposal and your projects further. Please call us if you nave any questions. Sincerely, Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Michael Schroeder Vice President 123 North Third Street, Suite 100. Minneapolis. MN 5340M659 Ph (612) 338-0800 Fx (612) 338-6838 4 Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. was established in 1982 with a practice that focused on urban and regional planning. Since then, additional disciplines have been added, and the firm has evolved to the point where projects are balanced between the disciplines of planning, landscape architecture and urban design. HKGi currently has a staff of eight landscape architects and three urban planners. HKGi has established a reputation for e.xcellence in conceptual design, detail design and community, land use and environmental planning] including projects related to master planning, downtown and redevelopment planning, and site design. Our recent e.xperience includes projects from the Twin Cities area and other locations that have similar goals as Long Lake. Most significantly, HKGi has been involved in many downtown master planning and redevelopment planning efforts, each of which deal with issues of creating a sense of place, encouraging private sector investment and fostering a pedestrian environment, and signficant part of those efforts is the creation of policies and guidelines for both public and private sector development activities. Recent and current master planning, redevelopment planning and urban design work that addresses, among other things, design guidelines includes: Mound Visions; Mound, Minnesota Richfield Lake Area Master Plan; Richfield, Minnesota Mississippi Crossings Redevelopment Study; Champlin, Minnesota Downtown and Riverfront Redevelopment Plan; Monticello, Minnesota Community Revitalization Master Plan; Cloquet, Minnesota Town Center Design and Pedestrian Environment Enhancement Study; Windsor, Connpr:.'.-^; France Avenue ana 0%> . Road Redevelopment Study; Bloomington, Minnesota Downtown Redevelopment Plan; Prior Lake, Minnesota Capitol Hill Neighborhood Streetscape; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Downtown Streetscape and Development Framework; Milledgeville, Georgia City Center Concept Plan and Design Guidelines; Plymouth, Minnesota Downtown Lakefront Development and Streetscape Concept; Branson, Missouri Downtown Redevelopment Study; Hugo, Minnesota B.ackground and Qualifications Hoisington Koegier Group Inc.H K / Project Team Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. proposes to assign the following individuals to the work in Long Lake: Michael Schroeder is Vice President of Hoisington Koegler Group and a registered landscape architect with more than 15 years of experience. He has experience in the completion of large and small scale urban and community design projects in Minnesota and other states. Michael s past work includes master planning and urban design projects in Monticello, Richfield, Cloquet, Chanhassen, Hugo, and Champlin. He has also recently completed streetscape and redevelopment concepts for Middletown, Connecticut; Branson, Missouri; the Capitol Hill neighborhood of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Warrensburg, Missouri; Milledgeville, Georgia; and Windsor, Connecticut Current projects include an “Urban Village ” for Richfield, Minnesota; a strategic plan for Wadena, Minnesota; and a master plan for the CARAG neighborhood in Minneapolis. Michael Schroeder would serve as Principal-in-Charge and lead the design effort for the development of design guidelines. Loren Gordon is an urban planner with HKGi with a wide range of community planning and ordinance experience. Loren has also worked on zoning code revisions in Ankeny, Iowa; Elkhart, Indiana; Mound, Minnesota, where he also serves as the City Planner, Medicine Lake, Minnesota; Falcon Heights, Minnesota; Becker, Minnesota; and is currently assisting Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota with both zoning and subdivision ordinance overhauls. Lrocn will panicipate in the design guidelines portion of the work with a particular focus on the relationship of proposed guidelines to existing ordinances. Melissa Wolff is a graduate landscape architect with HKGi with experience ranging in scale from community-wide visioning to site design and construction observation. Melissa’s recent project involvement includes comprehensive planning for New Brighton, Minnesota; a community greenway in Mound, .Minnesota; streetscape design for E.xcelsior Boulevard in St. Louis Park, Minnesota; and design of play areas at several Minneapolis public schools. Melissa is currently involved in a master plan for the CARAG neighborhood in Minneapolis; a student hosuing project forCarleton College inNorthfleld, Minnesota; site design for play areas at Fulton School in Minneapolis; and a bandshell Hobington Koegler Group Inc.H K J The historic town of Windsor is surrounded by the beautiful Connecticut countryside of the Connecticut River Valley. Although the location of Windsor town center has changed over the centunes, the Green has always been the heart of this community. A source of historical and sentimental value, the community has defended the Green against parking lots and other incompatible design m^y times over the years. But the Green is not without its problems. Recognizing this fact, the city hired Hoisington Koegler Group as part of a design team whose charge was to aeate an urban design solution that would enhance the pedestrian environment along the Green and throughout downtown Windsor. The design team observed that, although the Green is picturesque, it is not a very well-defined space. Placement of monuments, shrunken sizes of parts of the Green, and broken rows of trees all contribute, and a large number of trees breaks the viewshed, preventing uninterrupted views from one end to the other. Important properties at the Green’s ends are not well defined and don’t strongly terminate views. And Broad Street, an important element of the city’s retail district, is broken by drive-up banking facilities and parking lots, creating an unfriendly pedestrian environment. HKGi and the design team made design recommendations that focused on the current town center—the Green. It was determined that: future expansion must take place in small increments with projects that bind the center together as it evolves; development should focus on uses that will generate retail and non- retail activity for the center; the pedestrian environment must be enhanced as a central component of the town’s infrastructure; and the Green must be made an active place even when there is no event taking place. More specific recommendations designed to address these issues included: a need for the town to actively and financially participate in decisions to accomplish change; coordinate parking in the town center; make stronger connections to the area’s natural amenities as an activity-generating tool; use streetscape elements to create greater connections and more firiendly pedestrian environments within the center and in adjacent areas; and take advantage of redevelopment opportunities to strengthen definition of the Green’s space and the town’s center. The team identified key redevelopment opportunities, such as the need for a north terminus of the Green. -r' ' 'f Urban Design Pedestrian Environment Enhancement Study Windsor, Connecticut City of Windsor A norfffT'ft e^rtuvjs nxJ }if’J r.cpren < otrteme rr^ne die Qeen e rkrec,erjrc.TMpfCestr:jit erywomemand a 710 V wefi-jertnedspHt mats define ate spice of die Qeen QusPcueyi'fj JeongiroedSteet wu Diitems dt die Cftn Hoisir.kitc'n Kccjler Group L^c 190 In 1992 HKGi was commissioned by the City of Mound, Minnesota to manage their downtown revitalization effort called Mound Visions. HKGi staff members had developed the Mound Visions program in the preceding two years while they were with another firm. Mound Visions is a community- based approach to reinvigorating Mound's downtown through promcdon, business enhancement and redevelopment. The basis of the Vision is a downtown master plan and design guideline created by HKGi to assert progressive but sensidve redevelopment initiadves and build on Mound’ i rich history and community fabric. The vision revolves around urban form, concentrated development, multi-use, and linkages. The $2.5 million Lost Lake Canal/.Auditors Road project represents the reawakening of downtown Mound, a small community on Lake Minnetonka. Auditors Road will give downtown Mound a “main street" which has not been present since the county roads running through town were widened and street parking eliminated. The new street will be traditional, with on-street diagonal parking and streetscape elements recalling the community’s heritage. As a new retail district is created in the future, the buildings will be pedestrian- oriented with their front doors at the street overlooking Lost Lake Canal. Lost Lake Canal has great historical significance to the community. During Lake Minnetonka’s resort era of the early 20th Century, the canal was created from “The Big Lake” to downtown Mound to accommodate large passenger steamers. As the resort era faded, the canal fell into disrepair and was nearly forgotten. The new canal will once again allow pleasure boats access to docks in downtown Mound for dining, shopping and recreation. A restored passenger boat may once again grace the canal on reminiscent excursion trips. HKGi has worked closely with the DNR, Corp of Engineers and legal Watershed District to develop plans which exemplify current environmental practices. Habitat creadon, water quality improvements, wetland restorauon and shoreline preservation arc the ecological components of the project Mound Visions Mounti Minnesota Oty of Mound Iheaxtmmity Of MfHmd made a cotmious decision that thi fiitiae domtoum \k)und woddhaye “urban' rather than “suburban'tm Mourd\nslonsproposes concentrated nved* use, hlgter Intensity rederelopnientdianamitly exists. □ U »-■ U ^J\_ywy_y> C-QDD □□ Pte pe^ssran remm unks refghborfoods T •jcr md cyrecs ±en doyiirtcwn, pans, die an.es. M :he new Lost iMi Oeerway Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.HK Over Uic years, Uic business center of Cloquet has migrated to areas alooi' Highway 33. leaving its histone downtown without vitality. Hoisington Kocgler Group Inc. was hired to devise a master plan for community reviulization that focused on Cloquet’s downtown and three other business districts Tlie master plan addresses physical planning and design issues, and Lickles issues of economic viabiJitv* and implementatitm methods. Tlie first step was the aeation of a framework that links the disparate business districts. The framework recognizes the economic and market strengths of each district, tuid develops site and building continuity between the districts. .A. key idea was a shift m the community’s development paradigm: rather than development obliterating the forest, it should feel :is if development were carved from tlie forest. Guidelines were established for reforestation of remnant site and riglu-ot-way areas and for plantings at new and existing developmeiiL Building design guidelines were developed to encourage not only higher quality development, but development that would begiirto fit Cloquet’s intrinsic character. One of the most important factors in the revitalization of the downtown area was the introduction of new activity. The masterplan recommends replacement of underutilized and undeiwalued properties witli employment uses; light industrial uses would serve a.s a transition between tlie “main street” and the more intense industrial uses closer to the river. Parking would be upgraded or created between the stores on main street and die new liglu industry, serving both the new industrial uses and the original commercial uses. Avenue —an existing truck route—would serve as the connection between highways and new light industry, reducing the poteiui:d of new truck tr;iffic using the main streeL The now population of workers will bring new life and activity to the downtown area. 3m Dowmewn Qoqvet wrt! j mix of uses, ifcfudng new ttgfit mdustrn ecTmL ts just nonh of existing downtown retaf This strategy was important to the community’s economic development strategy: developers had inquired about industrial sites in Cloquet, and the city had considered the creation or a new industrial park outside of the current corporate limits. .Although limited space was available in downtown, the infrastructure needed to serve new industry was already available there. The community, w hile still in need of industrial land, was able to accommodate a limited amount of ne%v development and could plan for the more capital intensive industrial park development outside of town. Community Revitalization Master Plan Cloquet, Minnesota m _ Qty of Cloquet ..' m MI - led- A frzrr.eworn gfon demonstrates the strong relitionship thet an he createdIbr Qoquet ’s four business districts Derail gjiJelines dictate a character for de\ e:op-:ent met butlas from local chancer and sc os vesnmg to devetopment projects Hetstngron Kccgler Group Inc. ^@8 * % wi r. 1 Hoisingtoa Koegler Group is assisting the City of Richfield with the formulation of a master plan for the Richfield Lake area. The city has undergone significant changes over the past tew decades as potential residents and businesses have chosen to locate in developing suburbs, and populations have decreased or remained stable. The cir/ recognized that a key to its growth will be replacing lost housing and providing more housmg and commercial choices if it is to compete with developing suburbs. The Richfield Lake area represented the best opportunity the cir/ had for providing these opportunities for growth. The HKGi plan emphasizes the area’s unique natural beauty and small town quality, amenities tliat create an identir/ for Richfield as a place people want to live, work, shop and be entertained. The plan focuses on mamtaining Richfield Lake as the natural centerpiece, improving its water quality, and strengthening connections between it and local paths and gi'cnways, residential and commercial areas. New housing opportunities will be created to provide choices for relocating Richfield residents, to attract new residents, and to maintain existing neighborhoods. Ciiculation systems and public transit are modified to support, rather than dominate the district. In short, the Hoisington Koegler Group plan is about listening to people ar.d providing for their needs. It is reinvestment in the future that creates opportunities for growth, which will in turn support existing busines.^cs and drive new development. -------------r-.— c» 1 Richfield Lake Area Master Plan Richfield, Minnesota Oty of Richfield iiJSsp A nei¥tm Ik^and krrpwxfti ser\Kt mvnn Rfaifkitt ivouki mike ft esster to sround town a® ®£ :-£i ii®i I JI • I AUxedusefetfeiefopmentojmtk/iestHMuiSJdt^ aynmeruif. JfR.clffefdisgoing to ayn:?ffc 1»Je\ Hci^rg i key to itsgrowdi wtffbeprowcmg j vintty a retidjrO empioymrrt cfiacef. Tlie j/if? jfjr fs cm . Jt/on.; ndcietK :'3mt tj i jr f.v v lenv^ mu uniniaejs. Ciie\J¥con'ome nr>u} yuettscaoe .e5ign ctemens :oproitJe in fdenftrv for :ne ostna Hoistngtun Koegler Group Inc HK @0 Hoisington Koegicr Group Inc. is assisting the City of Savage with the formulation of a master plan for the Hamilton District—the original one square mile of the City of Savage. The area is rich in historical resources but is burdened by a significant number of problems, not the least of which is the district ’s image as viewed from Highway 13, the major east-west highway connecting Savage to the larger urban region. The old Hamilton community has a mixed-use fabric ranging from ver^. large grain terminals to single-family housing, the latter under considerable stress attributable to traffic and industrial forces. The study evaluates a range of options from simple clean-up fix-up to redevelopment of a substantial portion of the district. The process includes a significant public participation process with public information meetings, focus group sessions, a visioning session, and confidential interviews with key stakeholders.. The outcome includes a master plan and design guidelines, illustration ot development concepts, and vignettes of key amenities and features of the redevelopment effort. The plan builds from the intrinsic natural, cultural and historical influences of the Hamilton District to create a redevelopment plan that is a strong reflection of the district and a neighborhood that becomes integral to the Savage community. Hamilton District Master Plan • Sai-age, Minnesota Gty of Savage Housing fronts in open grem spice, ntetradittomlstyfeindscile of the iicJUtecture is pedestmn-Meniffy. - *■ '“iQ Vteplin Hustmes pubbc jpen spices cottneamg stgn/dant avtc suvcwres ind i town squire mtfun i fusrorxmtr of uses Hedestmns ire nmted to congregite ind reflect on dm tmonc surroundings. ll't • i •»«'/«« •• '• ’• *« •Mit *•>•••• — •*•••• ^a***** •»•••• Hoiiington Kocgicr Group Inc.laia ST W> « V#C'. -r.' Based on the pre-proposal meeting conducted by the City of Long Lake, the information contained the request for proposals, and a review of site conditions and documents provided by the cit>. HKGi has gained a sense of what is needed and desired in Long Lake. This understanding is central to our proposal and is the basis for the work program that is included as a part of this proposal. Our understanding of Long Lake’s needs and desires includes: ^Statement of Understanding • The city desires the creation of design guidelines to shape development various areas and districts of the community. The aim is to direct the scale and design of development in ways that reflect Long Lake’s small town character. • An important part of this project should be the articulation of a vision :'or the entire city. Aspects of the vision may be found in the city’s comprehensive plan, but it does net provide much direction for downtown. A review, a confirmation and possibly, an expansion of the directions found in the comprehensive plan would benefit this project. • Long Lake faces significant change as a result of regional infmtructure changes. Highway 12 will be relocated to the south of its current location, and there will be no access from Highway 12 directly into downtown Long Lake. Old Highway 12 will experience a reduction in traffic volume (at least in the short term), which may present opportunities icr downtown and for the character of the roadway. This project should look at the creation of a master plan for downtown and examine the potential for streetscape enhancements on Old Highwav 12. • Coupled with the master plan for downtown should be the creation of design guidelines for buildings (and sites) in downtown. A part of this effort may include the creation of an incentiv e package to encourage the updating of existing buildings in downtown in conformance with the design guidelines. Without this step, the community will have design guidelines that set criteria for new developmee- 5, /when and if it occurs), but has nothing to promote change from within. • Design guidelines should be developed for the city’s industrial district, which could be termed more of a “business park.” As in other areas, definition of guidelines for site dev elopmeni must be addressed. • Residential area.' of Long Lake may be severiv impacted by the rclocat.on of Highway 12. including loss of residential structures and a separation between some residential areas and downtown Hoisingion Koegkr Group Inc tBSS paf 6 sni en t of standing (as a result of the relocation of Highway 12). Guidelines for new«^^ • me work of this project will be guided by the Design Review Board and the Planning Commission, along with dty staff lovolvemen. of the public may be a critical pa„ in articulttg a vision that IS derived from the needs and desires of residents md u^«sowners, and may also be critical in building undeistanding rfand support for the ultimate design guidelines. * • me work of this project must proceed at a pace that allows completion of work before expiration of the city’s moretorium k required to ensure structures to guide development are in place pnor to the end of the moratorium. W K Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. O I Approach An approach to this project must be organized to build an understanding of critical issues and community desires, and to develop guidelines that respond creatively. Involvement of the community is the key: if the concepts developed for downtown Long Lake, Old Highway 12, or any other part of the Long Lake community are to have meaning, it will be as a result of the local knowledge provided by stakeholders. Our process places people at the forefront, making them part of the initial investigation, providing ways for them to evaluate ideas throughout the project, and strategizing methods for them to be involved throughout the process of implementing any enhancements. Participation will include community meetings, as well as oversight and direction by Design Review Board, Planning Commission and city staff. While this project might be accomplished without the community’s direct involvement at key points, key aspects of implementation might be diminished if the process proceeds without their insights or concerns be addressed or incorporated. The transfer of ideas between the community (and the Design Review Board and Planning Commis>ion) and the consultant happens best in a workshop environment. The consultant comes into a workshop session v/!th ideas in a formative stage, and modifications occur with direct input from those attending. The session becomes one of learning and growth, rather than presentation and reaction. There can be more formal presentations at the end of the process; in the beginning, the emphasis should be on sharing ideas and developing strong, meaningful concepts for various districts in Long Lake -> especially for downtown — and appropriate supporting design guidelines. People are generally busy, and even dedicated individuals have demands on their time that takes away from worthy efforts. In this project, we need to have people participate .the process. It should be a process of discovery and renewal, so that people commit themselves to moving forward. We intend, therefore, to make very good use of the time they will share, and to make the process rewarding and fun. .\s we expect the community to provide info.mation to us, we must translate that information into ideas. We need to listen, and then seek solutions that build from the input provided, not a solution that might have worked in another place. Once concepts have been generated and put into a form that can be understood, the community will be asked to evaluate them. In the end, one concept will evolve that best respects the opportunities of the community and its desires, and the 4 Hoisington Kocgler Group Icc.M K paf S r special qualities of Long Lake. It is important that the project not .»nd at this point. We do not intend to create a “paper plan’' — one that looks great but never happens. Our intention is to work with city staff to strategize methods for making the design guidelines come alive in Long Lake. We would like to determine methods for those businesses in Long Lake that already exist to work with the design guidelines to improve their properties. Without this, the design guidelines may simply sit on a shelf, waiting for development. By encouraging activities on the part of those who already are in business in Long Lake, the community can begin the process of renewal from within, creating an environment where new development “fits in” rather than dominates. The Work Plan that follows is based on our understanding of the project to this point. While it builds on the approach described above and it is the basis for this proposal, it can be modified to more directly address the needs and concerns of City of Long Lake. • i Hoisington Koegler Group Inc H K page 9 In crafting a set of design guidelines that relates to the development of sites and buildings in Long Lake, HKGi must first understand what exists and what people desire for development character in those areas. The same is true of efforts to define the future character and function of downtown or the aesthetics of streets. The first steps in this process are meant to provide that base of understanding, so that subsequent explorations are directed toward standards that can be supported by the community, but also so that they are appropriate to Long Lake. There will be a need for discourse in this process. HKGi intends to work directly with the Design Review Board and Planning Commission, whose primary role is to shape the development of the guidelines and to evaluate them as they are created. We also believe that the community ~ especially land and building owners and local businesses - should be exposed to the work before it is completed. We have structured the work program to allow input from the community at key points in the development of the design standards. Informing these key players and permitting them to comment in venues less structured than public hearings will be beneficial to the procei.s. Based on our understanding of the City of Long Lake ’s needs and our experience in this type of work, we have formulated a work program that describes the tasks and steps we anticipate for the development of design guidelines. Although it is the basis fo’ this proposal, it can be modified to more directly meet the needs of the city. Task 0.0 Organize the effot In order to facilitate the project with a complete understanding of the process for involving stakeholders; the role and responsibilities of the Design Review Board, Planning Commission and city staff; schedules for the work; and communication processes (focusing on communication with the community and affected nearby property owners); we will meet with a “design guidelines task force” (composed of the Design Review Board, planning commission and city staff) to review the project and agree upon the approach to the work. The purpose of this task is to clarify intentions and roles at the outset of the project, rather than having to refocus or redirect efforts once work has begun. One of the first tasks in the creation of design guidelines is to understand the perspectives of those individuals who will be directly involved in shaping the work. In order to achieve a sense of where the “task force stands, each member will be provided with a single-use camera ^d assigned the task of taking photographs of buildings, spaces or Work Program Hoisington Koegler Group Inc SBalfeiH K 511 pag€ / 0 [•IilKtl •llWCtlM*!# ofltiinriirrr]•llWfMTOjl r«ir^ rtTiir*TO •WlWli] •llWOT^ WiKTO [•rivtici o.iM V. •rtT^ [•inrtiiTsi •ivniis •iflirlw [tji^ UCtKiTil ilK o i Wirltlil [•■•iVtl M 3 i ♦ '** r * f K v_ r • This stage of the work will assess or examine: • the character and qualities of Long Lake that might be reflected in a set of design guidelines, in an effort to maintain its identity and image as a place; • patterns of land use that might influence the directions for site and building design guidelines, and that might direct patterns of streetscape or other connection in Long Lake; • those features of the community that are positive image or identity elements, as well as those that are not. Tasks: 1.1 Review background information provided the city. 1.2 Tour Long Lake (and surrounding areas) with “local experts” to understand the physical, social and political influences that might affect the project. 1 J Investigate forces that might influence the development of design guidelines and a master plan for downtown, including natural forces (vegetation, topography, surface water); man-made forces (land use, open space, traffic patterns, utilities, existing and planned developments, building stock); economic forces (business activity, potential development); community forces (history, elements of local culture, general safety concerns, relationship with other community features); and other influences (views, special features, folk lore). 1.4 Present found information at a community meeting in the form of existing conditions and “opportunities and challenges” graphics (in Task 2.0). Deliverables: • summary of conditions and influences that might guide the development of design guidelines and a master plan for downtown. Task 2.0 Understand what is desired Meaningful design standauls niust not only recognize those patterns or factors that reflect the cha.acter of a place, they must also strive to capture the spirit of what the people desire. HKGi proposes to begin the involvement of the community at this point in the process. We can begin with an understanding that no decisions have been maae, no directions have been set, and no plans have been drafted. We would begin with a presentation - building the case for design guidelines and Hoisington Kocgler Group Inc. iMIllS s\ I pagt I 2 rt tiiii*]WMlfTil w»rtw &cr»raiTc5] [tltWOT L«|cil t •!• i4 irx [•■CiTtI MllTtiraTil r*I«ITiTfT^ •liifeiiTifirrr |T«J| UK o i HK 3 i > -V.- - V I .. , „ . ' Each alternative might have different implications in terms of aesthetics; relationship to other community features; establishment or reinforcement of landmarks or other identity features; cost; development potential; orthe means of implementation. Sketches, diagrams, sections, photographs or sketches will be used to illustrate the intentions of each of the alternative concepts. By exploring varying assumptions and proposing alternatives the “task force ” can be assured that: • the design standards are accurate reflections of the community’s perspective on development and control of development; • investigations consider the widest range of possible issues that will be encountered as design standards as used to evaluate development proposals. The translation of alternative sceiiarios to more final direction occurs only after the Task Force has the opportunity to consider the implications of the alternatives and they understand how each alternative supports Long Lake's desired vision and character. The ‘^k force ” will be asked to select a preferred scenario, or to combine the best aspects of any of the scenarios presented. HKGi will then refine the guidelines and plans into a preferred alternative. Tasks: 3.1 Explore a range of alternative concepts for design guidelines, and enhancements to downtown and public spaces; generate alternatives in order to identify a broad range of possible solutions. 3.2 Review alternatives with “task force”and select a preferred direction. Deliverables: • concept alternatives Task 4.0 Define appropriate design guidelines and refine (he master plan and streetsape directions Once the “task force ” selects a preferred direction, HKGi will refine the design guidelines and master plan to reflect the level of detail needed to ensure consistency with the vision and continuity through implementation.Hoisingion Koedcr Group Inc HK@a pan* / 4 I . • Communicating the qualities of the design guidelines to the public is essential; it cannot occur in “zoning language.” HKGi will prepare an illustrative document - with photographs, sketches, diagrams and supporting narrative - tu allow people to fully understand what will be required by the design guidelines. The document will be “friendly and approachable”- a key step in ensuring that it is both read and understood. It will also provide the requisite technical information to ensure that reviews of development proposals are substantive and credible. This IS equally true of any physical changes that might be recommended in the master plan for downtown or the streetscape concepts that are suggested. The plan may reflect anticipated changes in use; vehicle and pedestrian circulation systems; the qualities and character of public and private spaces; connections between downtown, and nearby neighborhoods, and the lake; architectural character for new structures; economic development activities; identity elements and pedestrian amenities; and the character and location of special features that might convey a sense of community heritage and spirit. Key areas of the downtown master plan may be developed to a greater level of detail to demonstrate how the specific areas fit the overall plan. While every detail will not be defined in the master plan process, the plan that results will provide solid direction for subsequent planning and design efforts, and it will demonstrate how the vision of the community is articulated through key strategies. The desipi guidelines and master plan for enhancements to downtown and public spaces will be reviewed with the “task force ” and adjustments will be made based on input received. Tasks: • 4.1 Refine the preferred alternatives into draft design guidelines and a master plan for downtown and public spaces. 4.2 Illustrate character elements and features in key area plans. 4.3 Review the master plan and design guidelines with the “task force;” and make adjustments as required. Deliverables: design guidelines fer sites and buildings in various districts master plan for downtown and streetscapes illustrating uses; depictions of character and amenities; a description (verbal and graphic! of various plan elements and details; and the qualitic5 '-naracter and form of development and spaces Hiilsington KoccIcr Group Inc. jJBjlJ I pagt I 5 Task 5.0 Agree to move forward The design guidelines and the master plan are i*e community’s effort to guide development along a path that supports ieir vision. Informing the community of the directions that have been set might best occur in an “Open House” - before the work is brought for formal review. An Open House allows the public to view the standards at their own pace, to ask questions directly of the consultants and "task force” without having to ask the questior.s publicly, and to offer written and verbal comments. HKGi proposes to conduct such an Open House to receive final comments from the community prior to preparing the final design guidelines and master plan. Input received at the Open House will be re'.iewed with the “task force” and incorporated into the work as direred. HKGi will then prepare a draft document for presentation to the Planning Commission. Based on comment received, the final documer.: will be produced. Tasks: 5.1 Prepare draft document for design guidelines and master plan for downtown and public space. 5.2 Conduct an Open House to present the design guidelines and master plan. 5.3 Review input from Open House with "usk force.” 5.4 Present draft plan to Planning Commission. 5.5 Prepare and submit final plan based on input from the Planning Commission. Deliverables: • draft plan for review by “task force” and Planning Commission • illustrative design guidelines describing indentions and directions for site and building development in various districts of Long Lake (“camera ready ” copy ) • master plan for downtown and streetscapes (“camera ready ” copy) • full-size reproducible copies of all graphics larger than 8-1/2 ” X 11 ” • digital copies of all documents provided Holsington fCo«gIer Group loc H K i 6 The fee for preparation of the design guidelines and master plan for Long Lake is based on the Work Program described above. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. proposes to perform this work for a fee of $20,000.00 (plus e.\penses). The fee can be defined by task as follows: Task 0.0 Task 1.0 Task 2.0 Task 3.0 Task 4.0 Task S.O Organize the effort Identify what exists Understand what is desired Explore possible directions Define appropriate guidelines and refine master plan Agree to move forward $750.00 $2,000.00 $1,650.00 $6,750.00 $4,850.00 $4.000.00 Total Fees $20,000.00 HKGi will complete this work within six months of notification to begin work. We will work with the City of Long Lake to review the schedule and process for review and approval in an effort to have necessary policies and guidelines in place at the expiration of the city’s morato rium. The following generalized schedule might apply: e?m 9s S's uu. uk.m'2. *c CL < >sm ues 5 ^ 3 3 < £eu Gmwe/3 •'jT Task 0.0 Orgtnize (he eflbrt .>• Task 1.0 .4...... Identify what exists Task2.0 Understand whal is ^1 V. desired Task 3.0 Explore possible directions •J. r’- V Task 4.0 Oertne guiddtnes; refine master plen . Task 5.0 Agree to move forward k:.. ’•» • «• ».• i ' fz ’V M- M m mr;. •• ' •e, * •• •• f*” ’ I r\- 1 .‘'••I* ' * r. ' ) . • ..‘s- ■ < K-' a L % V • .*• ■ •e •• r • 4 • .3. *!•- - « ^ a 00 w 3 Q53 s •>k ea r s c z 3 U Fee'and Schedule *• •• *4’- r -n-frr-* ' Q0C Q 3 3 33O e /! r! |2 3 U eC.15 ^ o 'tiocs:Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.IS pagt t 7 EDUCATION B.L.A. University of Minnesota REGISTRATION Landscape Architect Minnesota MEMBERSHIPS AND AFFILIATIONS Minnesota Design Team • Steering Committee Member and Past Chair, Team Leader PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE MICHAEL SCHROEDER is a Landscape Architect widi thirteen years of experience on a wide range of projects, including community and urban design studies, streetscapes, master planning, site planning and site design, recreation design, and landscape design. Past work includes projects in the public and private sectors throughout the midwest. Mr. Schroeder has presented workshops and lectures on “grass roots ” planning and design, leadership development streetscape design, stormwater management and aesthetics, and sustainable design. He is a frequent lecturer and speaker for the .Minnesota Landscape Arboretum and the Minnesota State Horticulture Society. As a volunteer with the Minnesota Design Team, Mr. Schroeder has served on more than a dozen community visits, and as treasurer and Chair of the organization. He served as project coordinator for the development of the Design Team’s Community Manual (used by communities as they prepare for the MDT’s community- based design process) which received a merit award from the American Society of Landscape Architects in 1992. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Richfield State Agency, Richfield, MN; Richfield Urban Village • CiQ'ofMonticello,MN; Downtown andRiverfiontRevitalization Plan • City of Cloquet, MN; Community Revitalization Master Plan ■ City of Little Canada, MN; Rice Street/Little Canada Road Development Guide • City of Richfield, MN; Richfield Lake Area Master Plan • City of Champlin, MN; Mississippi Crossings Redevelcpment Plan • Easter Lutheran Church, Eagan, .MN; Master Plan and Site Design • City of Central City, NE and the Nebraska Lied .Main Street Program; Main Street Streetscape Concepts MICHAEL SCHROEDER, RIA VICE PRESIDENl HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC i ' H KHoisington Kocgler Group lac. S3 i t City of Windsor, CT; Urban Design and Pedestrian Environment Enhancement Study City of Taylors Falls, MN; River Street Concept Design City of Monticello, MN; Community Center Concepts and Implementation Strategy City of Warrensburg, MO; Downtown Streetscape Concept Main Street Middletown, Inc., Middletown, CT; Downtown Streetscape Concept Wayne Main Street, Inc., City of Wayne, NE; Downtown Streetsa^)e Concept City of Circle Pines, MN; Lake Drive and Lexington Avenue Comprehensive Urban Master Plan City of Plymouth, MN; City Center Concept Plan and Design Guidelines City of Richfield, MN; Lyndale Avenue Strategic Development Plan City of Richfield, MN; 66th Street/35W Bridge Design Concept City of Russell, KS and the National Main Street Center, Streetscape Design Concepts City of Falcon Heights, MN; Larpenteur Avenue Streetscape Design Main Street Keokuk, Inc., Keokuk, lA; Streetscape Design Concept City of Mounds View, MN; Highway 10 Design Concept City of Champlin, MN; Gateway Corridor Design Concept City of Duncan, OK and the National Main Street Center; Streetscape Concept City of Elk River, MN; Highway 10 Corridor Study City of Elk River, MN; Riverfront Corridor study City of Hooker, OK and the National Main Street Center, Streetscape Concept City of Taylors Falls, MN; Pedestrian Underpass at U.S. Highway 8; Design Concept City of Chanhassen, MN; Pedestrian Bridge over T.H.5, Landscape Architecture Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, Minneapolis Public Library and the Neighborhood Revitalization Program; Webber Park Joint-Use Facility Design Concept Andersen Coiporation, Bayport, MN; F.C. Andersen Residence Landscape Architecture H.B. Fuller Corporate Campus, Vadnais Heights, MN; Master Planning and Site Design • • V. . . .S' '■ ’ *. *.• • V. I '* • - % Michael Schroeder Resume/Page 2 • r-*" .>*4v7 - Hoistngton Koegler Group lac.HK •I t EDUCATION B.S. Community and Regional Planning, Iowa State University MEMBERSHIPS AND AFFILUTIONS American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association Minnesota Planning Association Co-Chair, Ohio Planning Conference, Dayton/Miami Valley Chapter, 1995-97 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Loren Gordon is a community planning consultant with a wide range of public and private experience in Minnesota, Ohio and Iowa. He specializes in community and regional planning, land use analysis, economic and demographic analysis, site planning, and ordinance revision. Prior to forming HKGi, Mr. Gordon worked as a community planner for Woolpert LLP, where his responsibilities included comprehensive planning at city and county government levels and ongoing planning services for two communities. Loren has also serveu as the acting City Planner for the City of Miamisburg, OH and as a planner for the City of Ankey, lA. In these positions, he has designed and coordinated Mainstreet projects, corridor enhancement plans, and inventorized and analyzed park facitlities. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE City of Inver Grove Heights, MN; Comprehensive Plan City of La Crescent, MN; Comprehensive Plan City of Mound, MN; Ongoing Planning Services City of Becker, MN; Comprehensive Plan Update City of Becker, MN; Ongoing Planning Services City of Ankeny, lA; Park Facilities Inventory and Analysis City of Ankeny, LA; Corridor Enhancement Plan City of Elkhart, IN; Comprehensive Plan City of Elkhart, IN; Zoning Ordinance Fayette County, OH; Comprehensive Plan Johnson County, IN; Comprehensive Plan City of Bluefleld, WV; Comprehensive Plan LOREN GORDON, AlCP HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. Hotsington Koegler Group loc 11 K • * ‘ 4* * { -- -A-.,—-- ---------------- it- t ciS^ oVr*" us' pi™ Cto ofT.' Alexandria. KYs;r; "ESLr oTv;-“.”Empowerment Program Plan ’ Neighborhood Stu'dy°M'd'ortin\“nli Facility Ind3ul M«k« Anafy* it“'''‘’"‘’’’ “'"“>8''»Pl>i« *»<i USAF°*u''!E”‘"'i "”“*‘"8 M"l«« Analysis Use Plan "" *''**'*’ ^®">P«hensive Land usAp":S:;ir.;^p‘rd:"S^^^^^^Area Plan * " Terminal Sub USAF - Hurlbnr. Field, Eglin AFB; South Shore Sub Area Population Proje*'c't!'o^ns****^ District; Land Use and L^^nteVui trsrr'°“°"= ' -V a *•*-•^.f • .• ^ Loren Cordon Resume/Pj •:■ . ■ '• S02 i '4 Hoistngton Koegler Group Ii ff K f "1 , • O 1 EDUCATION B.S. Landscape Architecture, University of Wisconsin • Madison HONORS AND MEMBERSHIPS Undergraduate Honor Award, American Society of Landscape Architects American Society of Landscape Architects, Associate Member PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE MELISSA WOLFF is a landscape architect in training with 3 years of experience. Melissa is a talented contribution to HKGi, with skills in conceptual design, design development and construction detailing. She has applied her talents to numerous neighborhood and community streetsc^ie, green way, and park planning and design projects. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE Excelsior Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN; Streetscape Design Community Park, Falcon Heights, MN; Park Entrance Design Creekside Park, Johnston lA; Master Plan Minneapolis Park Board; Victory Park, Minneapolis, MN; Design Development and Construction Documentation Minneapolis Public Schools: Lyndale, Ramsey and Fulton School Playgrounds, Minneapolis, MN; Conceptual and Master Planning, Design Development and Construction Documentation Lost Lake Greenway, Mound, MN; Master Plan, Design Development and Construction Documentation MELISSA WOLFF HOiSINGTON KOECLER GROUP INC HoisLngton Kocgicr Group loc. I education Bachelors of Environmental IDesiffn rr ’ Meters of U„ds„p. Archhecn,^’ "2^'"°^'^'""“"“ ’ University Of Minnesota OFE.^'CmMAr _____ ■" M«ttr Plying ocumentation. His interest is in urban de^^ including construction planning and recreational design. community • City of Hastings. MN- Rivelfr o ' ^“*«rPIan • Cio- of H«,i„gs. mn ! ^ • C.(y of Hating., mN; Wallin P«I^<,n ““ • S oft “^ New Po« Office Redevelopment Guide ’ "^^^ape Concepts, Downtown A • *™= ISWomrauniiy Eniry City of Hopkins. MW- c*____^2^Hop.„, mN; Sicee^eape Al.e™..i„, f„ e„elaio. Millenninm Plaaa. Wheeta >"<l“siria| Corridor, St. Paul, MN psrc:,‘cr-'=^-- Designed Ho!s1nr^!!f°^“^ ColfCourse, Wabasha,MN ^dependence, MN Preserving open space. --------- •" ®"'*N H arsb 'I «OBGieR <3«OUP INC .<-• *. I ■Jr I Hoiiington Koegier Group loc ff Kan r ^ COUNCIL MEETING HAR 1 3 2000 Cl IY uh QHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 8,2000 ITEM NO: / Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Ron Moorse City Administrator’s Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Planning Commission Reappointments The terms of Planning Commission members, Jan Berg and Dale Lindquist, expire on March 31, 2000. Both have indicated they are interested in serving an additional three year term on the Planning Commission. Also, Bill Stoddard was q)pointed to an unexpired term on the Planning Commission that expired in March of 1999. Although he has continued to serve, the Council has not taken formal action to reappoint him to a new three year term. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to reappoint Jan Berg and Dale Lindquist to three year terms on the Planning Commission expiring March 31, 2003, and a motion to reappoint Dale Stoddard to a three year term on the Planning Commission beginning April 1,1999 and expiring on March 31,2002. K- i' 1.' cm INCIL MEETING MAR 1 3 2000 Cl IY OF ORONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 9,2000 ITEM NO: / 3 Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Titk City Clerk Administrator Reviewed:__m__Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval SET-UP LICENSE Don Scherven Navarre Lanes Inc. 3435 Shoreline Drive RESIDENTIAL KENNEL LICENSE Tris Strulde KJohn 4455 North Shore Drive COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. K j diUi ^ ■AMiiiUiiA , "it mii^l Date:March 7.2000 To:Lin Vee, City Clerk From:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Re:Set-Up License - Navarre Lancs I have reviewed past records involving Navarre Lanes and no problems were found. Therefore, I have no objection to the issuance of license. *■ I' m rtirimiai Miin n nr i a »>if¥nrT tmi i iif g* Minnesota Department of Public Safety ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 444 Cedar St. Suite 133, St. Paul, MN 5S101-S133 (651) 296-6439 TTY (651) 282-6555 www.dps.state.mn.us/alcgamb/alcgamb.html RENEWAL OF CONSUMPTION & DISPLAY PERMIT Permit Fee $150 (Renewal Date; April 1) MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 5598 PUBLIC Navarre Lanes Inc. Navarre Lanes Box 51 Navarre^ MN 55393 IF NAME AND ADDRESS ' SHOWN ARE NOT CORRECT. MAKE CHANGES BELOW Worker's Comp Ins. Co..Policy No.Policy Period City/County where permit approved: Permit Name:Navarre Lanes, Inc. Trade Name:Navarre Lanes Location address:3435 Shoreline Drive City, State, ZIP Code: Navarre ^ MN 55392 Business Phone:471-8811 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership, corporate officers, bylaws, membership, partners, home addresses, or telephone numbers. If changes have occurred during the past 12 months, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. Applicant*!! signature on this renewal confirms the followingi Failure to report anv of the followina will KSUlt In flPCSt 1. Applicant confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/towrtship/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 2. Applicant confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state of local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Applicant confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Applicant confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. 5. Applicant confirms, no club on-s^ intoxicating liquor license is held. 6. Applicant confirms busin^i$^rei^es arc separate from any other business establishment. Applicant Signature Date (Signature certifies all above rnfoAatfon to be correct and pcrmic has been approved by city/county.) City Clcrk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that a consumption and display permit has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) PS09097 (01/00) KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1, 200_to December 31, 200^ Owner: Property Address: <44^^ fO • (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different): Phone: (home) Li 900_______(work)____ RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: 3 (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: ^ | ^ ^ bcc;<^, Purpose for more than 2 does: rr-CrtcCbcfy~>>____ Dogs normally kept: X inside ____^kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: _______________ Business Activities:____________ ___________________ (exanq>le: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: ________________________ After Hours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are:____inside ___^outside Jj^both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigned hereby grants the City permission to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. Applicant D‘ ((o ■ o<) Date For City Use Only Kennel inspected by Recommends: Approval Dental Date 10 Mar 2000 ?ri 12:28 PM Check Register City o£ Oror> Check Number Date Name Check Number 60905 60905 60905 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS 09-Mar-00 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS 09-Mar-00 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS Totals Check Number 60905 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS Check Number 60906 AIRTOUCH CBLLULAR/BELLEVUE 'nieck Number 60907 AT fc T - TAMPA 60907 09-Mar-00 AT a T - TAMPA Totals Check Number 60907 AT a T - TAMPA Check Number 60908 BCA/TRAINING a DEVELOPMENT 60908 60908 09-Mar-00 09-Mar-00 BCA/TRAINING a DEVELOPMENT BCA/TRAINING a DEVELOPMENT Totals Check Number 60908 BCA/TRAINING a DEVELOPMENT Check Number 60909 BIFFS INC. 60909 60909 09- Mar-00 10- Mar-00 BIFFS INC BIFFS INC Totals Check Number 60909 biffs inc. Check Number 60910 BOBZIQI, SUB 60910 09-Mar-00 BOBZIEN. SUE Totals Check Number 60910 BOBZIEN« SUE Check Number 60911 BONESTROO ROSENS a ASSOC. 60911 60911 60911 09-Mar-00 09-Mar-00 09-Mar-00 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC. BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC. BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC. Transaction Amount 1.34 1.35 2.69 3.93 3.93 120.00 120.00 240.00 68.76 -13.19 55.57 91.00 91.00 100.00 76.00 238.00 Page 1 Comments SECURITY SERVICE SECURITY SERVICE 60906 09-Mar-00 AIRTOUCH CELLOLAR/BELLEVOB 143.17 CELL PHONE SERVICE 60906 09-M«r-00 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 13.92 ON CALL CELL PHONE 60906 09-Mar-00 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BEtXEVUE 13.91 ON CALL CELL PHONE 60906 09-Mar-00 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 347.65 POLICE CELL PHONES Totals Check Number 60906 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 518.65 CELL PHONE LD CHRGS DEATH SCENE INV-PISCHENIC DEATH SCENE INV-FISCHER PORTABLE - BIDERNOOD PARK CREDIT - BIFFS UNIFORM PANTS COUNCIL MTGS - JAN 2000 GEN ENG JAN 2000 POSS Sm TRUNKS-COMP PLAN COUNCIL MEETINQ MAR t 3 2000 c^vu^'onoNo 1 10 Mar 2000 Prl 12:20 PM Check Number Check Number Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Date Name 60911 BONESTROO ROSENB k ASSOC. Check Number 60912 60912 60912 BUDGET PRINTING 09- Mar-00 10- Mar-00 Totals Check Number BUDGET PRINTING BUDGET PRINTING 60912 BUDGET PRINTING Check Number 60913 60913 CATCO PARTS k SERVICE 09-Mar-00 Totals Check Number CATCO PARTS k SERVICE 60913 CATCO PARTS k SERVICE Check Number 60914 60914 CHAMPION AUTO STORES lO-Mar-00 Totals Check Number CHAMPION AUTO STORES 60914 CHAMPION AUTO STORES Check Number 60915 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO Transaction Amount Ccianents 60911 09>Mar-00 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,069.32 ENG APPLIC JAN 2000 60911 09-Mar-00 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.150.00 CALC TOTAL LENGTH-SMR SYS 60911 09-Mar-00 BONESTROO ROSENB k ASSOC.76.00 NAV WTR PLANT NARRANTY 60911 09-Mar-00 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.400.97 ORSNO ORCHARD SNR 1/00 60911 09-Mar-00 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.600.00 ELECTRONIC MAPPING 1/00 60911 09-Mar-00 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.214.00 TH12/STUBBS BY RD RFP01 60911 09-Mar-00 BONESTROO ROSENE k PSSOC.633.30 EAST LL SAN SVfR 1/00 60911 09-Mar-00 BONESTROO ROSENB k ASSOC.784.25 FOX RIDGE SAN SWR 1/00 Totals Check Number 60911 BONESTROO ROSENB k ASSOC.4,342.64 311.02 5.26 316.28 302.65 302.65 10.09 18.09 JR OFFICER BADGES SHIPPING TO UNIFORMS UNL PARTS FOR 424 SUPPLIES §432 Check Number 60916 60916 CITY OP LONG LAKE 09-Mar-00 Totals Check Number CITY OF LONG LAKE 60916 CITY OF LONG LAKE M I »0 31,009.50 31,009.50 60915 09-Mar-00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 171.10 pitman arm - §170 60915 09*Mar-00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 33.74 OIL CHANGE #185 60915 09-Mar-OO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 204.89 REPLACE PLUGS #101 60915 09-Mar-00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 192.88 OIL CKG, BATTERY r 3 60915 09-Mar-00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 317.13 OIL CHG, TUNE UP 102 60915 09-Mar-00 CHUNKS LAKESHCkE AUTO 62.51 OIL CHG, MNT TIREF 104 60915 09-Mar-00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 26.20 SECURE LOOSE CABLE Totalf Check Number 60915 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 1,008.53 FIRST QTR FIRE PROTECTION 10 Mar 2000 Fri 12:28 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 3 Check ffunber Oieck Number Date Name 60917 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH Check Number 60918 CITYVIEH PLUMBING k HEATING 60918 09-Mar-00 CITYVIEH PLUMBING k HEATING Totals Check Number 60918 CITYVIEH PLUMBING k HEATING Check Number 60919 CYS UNIFORMS 60919 09-Mar-00 CYS UNIFORMS Totals Check Number 60919 CYS UNIFORMS Check Nusher 60920 DCA - HIRE ONLY 60920 60920 09-Mar-00 09-Mar-00 DCA - HIRE ONLY DCA - HIRE ONLY Totals Check Number 60920 DCA - HIRE ONLY Check Number 60921 DE LISH 60921 09-Mar-00 DB LISH Totals Check Number 60921 DB LISH Check Number 60922 DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE CO. 60922 09-Mar-00 DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE CO. Totals Check Number 60922 DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE CO. Check Number 60923 E-Z RECYCLING 60923 09-Mar-00 E-Z RECYCLING Totals Check Number 60923 E-Z RECYCLING Transaction Amount Comments 60917 09-Mar-00 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 42.30 HOLIDAY LUNCHEON SUPPLIES 60917 09-Mar-00 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 8.00 PARKING 60917 09-Mar-00 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 9.54 HOLIDAY LUNCHEON 60917 09-Mar-00 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 4.24 CLEANING SUPPLIES 60917 09-Mar-00 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 17.99 Y2K LUNCHES 60917 09-Mar-00 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 23.32 RADIO CORD 60917 09-Mar-00 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 14.66 PIZZA - TRAINING 60917 09-Mar-00 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 15.75 POSTAGE 60917 09-Mar-00 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 0.33 POSTAGE 60917 09-Mar-00 CITY OP ORONO PETTY CASH 3.82 POSTAGE Totals Check Number 60917 CITY OF ORONO PETTY CASH 139.95 95.06 95.06 91.30 91.30 499.75 678.71 1,178.46 91.07 91.07 24.95 24.95 5.754.84 5.754.84 REPAIR TRUCK HASHER SHIRTS - HITTKB SPENDING ACCTS-3/1/00 SPENDING ACCTS 3/3/00 BOX LNCHS-LMACC MEETING 2000 ID CHECXUIG GUIDE CURBSIDE RECYCLING i 'ii r-i L_ _ _ _ _ _ 10 Mar 2000 Pri 12:28 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Nun^r Date Name Check Number 60924 60924 ELITE AUTO 09-Mar-00 ELITE AUTO Totals Check Number 60924 ELITE AUTO Check Number 60925 ESS BROTHERS 4 SONS 60925 09-Mar-00 ESS BROTHERS 4 SONS Totals Check Number 60925 ESS BROTHERS 4 SONS Check Number 60926 EXPRESS MESSENGER 60926 09-Kar-00 EXPRESS MESSENGER Totals Check Number 60926 EXPRESS MESSENGER Check Number 60927 FORTIS BENEFITS 60927 09-Mar-00 FORTIS BENEFITS Totals Check Number 60927 FORTIS BENEFITS Check Number 60930 60930 GRIGGS CONTRACTING lO-Mar-00 GRIGGS CONTRACTING Totals Check Number 60930 GRIGGS CONTRACTING Check Number 60931 HANSEN. STEVEN C. Transaction Amount 75.00 75.00 107.57 107.57 27.30 27.30 846.62 846.62 304.50 304.50 Page 4 Comments RADIO 24" GRATE DEL TO HINSHAN-LUZAICH LTD INSURANCE 3/2000 Check Number 60929 60929 G 4 09-Mar-00 K SERVICES G 4 K SERVICES 15.28 UNIFORMS - RATHBUN 60929 09-Mar-00 G 4 K SERVICES 115.45 UNIFORMS 60929 09-Mar-00 G 4 K SERVICES 9.67 UNI FORM- STEPFENHAGEN 60929 09-Mar-00 G 4 K SERVICES 15.28 UNIFORMS 60929 09-Mar-00 Q 4 K SERVICES 79.80 UNIFORMS 60929 09-Mar-00 G 4 K SERVICES 35.25 SHOP TOHELS 60929 09-Mar-00 G 4 K SERVICES 9.67 UNIFORM - STEPFENHAGEN 60929 09-Mar-00 G 4 K SERVICES 43.08 MAT SERVICE 60929 09-Mar-00 G 4 K SERVICES 43.08 MAT SERVICE 60929 09-Mar-00 G 4 K SERVICES 15.28 UNIFORM - RATHBUN 60929 09-Mar-00 G 4 K SERVICES 77.62 UNIFORMS 60929 09-Mar-OO G 4 K fTRVICES 9.67 UNIFORM - STEPFENHAGEN 60929 09-Mar-OO G 4 K SERVICES 86.84 MAT SERVICE PN 60929 09-Mar-00 G 4 X SERVICES 57.20 MATS - PO Totals Check Number 60929 G 4 K SERVICES 613.17 LABOR • BOARD REPL-GAS SY i 10 Mar 2000 Fri 12:28 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 5 Check Number Date Name Check Number 60931 60931 60931 HANSBN, STEVEN C. 09- Mar-00 HANSEN, STEVEN C. 10- Mar-00 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 60931 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Check Number 60932 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE 60932 09-Mar-00 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE Totals Check Number 60932 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE Check Number 60933 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 60933 09-Mar-00 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Totals Check NUndSer 60933 HENNEPIN COUinr SHBIIFF Check Number 60934 ISNNBPIN COUNTY TREAS. 60934 lO-Mar-00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. Totals Check Number 60934 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. Check Number 60935 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-ACCT 60935 09-Mar-00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-ACCT Totals Check :himber 60935 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-ACCT Check Number 60937 HINSHAW fc CULBERTSON IL Transaction Amount Comments 19.00 99.97 CLASS A LICENSE FEE SAFETY BOOTS 110.97 22.31 22.31 PROPANE 201.50 201.50 INSTALL RADIO - SQD 181 31.25 31.25 MAILING LIST k LABELS 814.00 RM k BOARD - 1/2000 814.00 60937 09-Mar-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 1,675.00 LEGAL APPLIC JAN 2000 60937 09-Mar-00 HINSHAM k CULBERTSON 1,047.50 HOYT RETAINING NALL 60937 09-Mar-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 80.00 APPLIC 2550 VAN ECKOOT 60937 09-Mar-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 56.00 STUBBS BY RD CUL-DE-SAC 60937 O-Mar-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 56.00 HEAD SEWER PROJ 60937 03-Mar-OO HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 48.00 EDGEWOOD HILLS SNR EAS4NT 60937 09-Mar-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 16.00 SHRLN/HERITAGE SNR EASMNT 60937 09-Mar-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 32.00 BAYRDGE SWR EASEMNTS 60937 09-Mar-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 32.00 NLL SWR EASEMNTS 60937 09-Mar-00 HINSHAN k CULBERTSON 325.76 FORMS REVIEW 60937 09-Mar-00 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 115.00 WILDHRST EST LS-NO EASMNT 60937 09-Mar-00 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 110.00 GUN CARRY PERMIT REVIEW 60937 09-Mar-00 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1,109.00 COUNCIL KTGS - JAN 2000 60937 09-Mar-00 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1,731.94 ORONO VS LUZAICH - TREES Totals Check Number 60937 HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 6,434.20 10 Nar 2000 Pri 12:28 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 6 Check Number Date Name Check Number €0938 60938 IMC SALT lO-Mar-00 IMC SALT Totals Check Number 60938 IMC SALT Check Number 60939 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA 60939 60939 60939 09- Mar-00 10- Mar-00 lO-Mar-00 rETH N. POTTS, PA rETH N. POTTS, PA KENNETH N. POTTS, PA Totals Check Number 60939 KENNETH N. POTTS« PA Check Number 60940 KUSTOM SIQIALS INC 60940 09-Mar-00 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC Totals Check Number 60940 KUSTOM signals inc Check NUq^r 60941 LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DIST. 60941 09-Mar-00 LAKE IfTKA CONSERVATION DIST. Totals Check Number 60941 LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DIST. Check Number 60942 LARSON PUBLICATIONS 60942 09-Mar-00 LARSON PUBLICATIONS Totals Check Number 60942 LARSON PUBLICATIONS Check Number 60943 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN 60943 60943 lO-Mar-00 lO-Mar-00 U4CIT-DERKLEY ADMIN LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN Totals Check Number 60943 I>1CIT-BERKLEY admin Check Number 60944 LOQIS 60944 lO-Nar-00 LOGIS Totals Check Number 60944 LOQIS Check Number 60945 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS 60945 lO-Mar-00 LONG LAKE BIO A AUTO PARTS Transaction Amount 1,915.59 1,915.59 2,391.66 238.00 248.50 2.878.16 145.50 145.50 8,249.64 8,249.64 61.20 61.20 326.00 453.00 779.00 958.50 958.50 15.98 Comments ROAD SALT PROSECUTIONS 2/2000 PORFEITURE 92 MERCURY PORFEITURE 95 OLDS VIDEO CASSETTES 2ND QUARTER LMCD LEVY ADV - PREBLANCE RECORDER INS ADJ NAV NTR 1999 INS INCREASE 1999 MV M 1.1 , 10 Mar 2000 Pri 12:28 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60945 60945 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS lO-Mar-00 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS Totala Check Number 60945 LONG LAKE BIG A AUTO PARTS Check Number 60946 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 60946 09-Mar-00 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 60946 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT Check Number 60947 MADSON, ADRIENNE 60947 09>Mar-00 MADSON« ADRIENNE Totals Check Number 60947 MADSON« ADRIENNE Check Number 60948 MAGIC CLEANERS 60948 09-Mar-OO MAGIC CLEANERS Totals Check Number 60948 MAGIC CLEANERS Check Number 60949 MALL OP MEklCA TRAINING PROG 60949 09-Mar-00 MALL OF AMERICA TRAINING PROG Totals Check Number 60949 MALL OF AMERICA TRAINING PROG Check Number 60950 MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING 60950 10-Mar>00 MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING Totals Check Number 60950 MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING Check Number 60951 MET COUNCIL ENVlROtetOITAL SVCS 60951 09-Mar-00 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Totals Check Number 60951 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Check Number 60952 METHODIST HOSPTIAL 60952 lO-Mar-00 METHODIST HOSPTIAL Totals Check Number 60952 METHODIST HOSPTIAL Check Number 60953 MINN COm 60953 09-Mar-00 MINN COMM Transaction Amount 18.16 34.14 62.84 62.84 34.00 34.00 6.66 6.66 200.00 200.00 26.00 26.00 19,956.00 19,956.00 1,167.75 1,167.75 4.34 Page 7 Comments HIRE TIES, CLAMP BEARING UNIFORM PANTS BLANKET CLEANING VERBAL JUDO - MCNICHOLS DIRECTORY ADV SENQl SERVICE 4/2000 THOMPTON 04/99 FED CHGS, TAXES • PAGERS 4 i btoiMitteiniDdriliiMaii 10 Mar 2000 Prl 12:2S PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60953 MINN COM4 Totals Check Number 60953 MINN COMM Check Number 60954 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 60954 09-Mar-00 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Totals Check Number 60954 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Check Number 60955 MINNBGASCO 60955 60955 60955 60955 60955 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO Totals Check Number 60955 MINNEGASCO Check Number 60956 MINNESOTA CONNAY 60956 60956 09-Mar-00 09-Mar-00 MINNESOTA CONNAY MINNESOTA CONNAY Totals Check Number 60956 MINNESOTA CONNAY Check Number 60957 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS 60957 09-Mar-00 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS Totals Check Number 60957 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS? Check Number 60958 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 60958 09>Mar-00 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE Totals Check Nujid^r 60958 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE Check Number 60959 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 60959 09-Mar-00 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Totals Check Number 60959 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Check Number 60960 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC. 60960 09-Mar-00 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC Transaction Amount 4.34 13.50 13.50 571.47 51.56 916.52 1.120.21 874.38 3.534.14 92.25 366.85 459.10 108.80 108.80 20.00 20.00 128.89 128.89 98.83 Page 8 Comments MEDICAL OXYGEN GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE ANNUAL FIRE EXT INSPBCTN ANNUAL EXT INSPECTIONS ADV - FREE LANCE RECORDER PEST APPL LICENSB-RON REP CRYSTAL BY RD FLASHER SPEAKER FROM 431 TO 422 I 10 Har 2000 Pri 12t28 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 9 Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 60960 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC. 60960 09-Mar-00 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC.126.61 SPEAKER FROM 431 TO 422 Totals Check Number 60960 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC.22S.44 Check Number 60961 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 60961 09-Mar-00 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 1,056.26 DIGITAL CAMERA Totals Check Number 60961 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 1.056.26 Check Number 60963 NAVARRE HARDNARB 60963 oa-Har-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 37.48 BUILDING GUTTER 60963 Od-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 10.18 BATTERIES FOR GO OPENERS 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 18.64 BULK CABLE - 8432 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 9.55 BUNGEE, VELCRO, NIPES 60963 08-Mar-OO NAVARRE HARDNARE 4.17 BULK NUTS, BOLTS 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 37.22 SHELVING 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 7.37 KEYS, TAGS, RING 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 4.46 SCRENDRIVER 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 11.21 BUNGEES, PLASTIC 60933 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 68.98 PLUNGERS, FILTERS 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 10.61 ENAMEL 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 13.83 BULK NUTS, BOLTS 60963 08*Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 10.83 ROSEN SOLDER, TIP 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 14.90 12 V BATTERY 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 6.35 KEYS 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 3.18 ANT KILLER BAIT 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 5.31 BASEBOARD AIR DEFLECTOR 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 4.98 AIR FRESHENERS 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 30.71 BATTERIES 60963 08-:<far-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 5.08 MISC HARNRE 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 1.91 DISH SOAP 60963 08-Mar-00 NAVARRE HARDNARE 4.04 GLASS MATE - NIPES Totals Check Number 6C363 NAVARRE HARDNARE 320.99 Check Number 60964 NCPER5 GROUP LIFE INS 60964 09-Mar-00 NCPBRS GROUP LIFE INS 144.00 PERA LIFE 3/00 Totals Check Number 6C364 HCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 144.00 Check Number 60965 NSP 60965 08-Mar-00 NSP 1,222.37 STREET LIGHTING 2/00 1 IIA IIkinBAkJIP l^ll r* ^ i f v‘. t Wl f#V*. Mil 1 'trft* lt»1i J.'.. .'.k. 10 Mar 2000 Pri 12:21 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Munber Check Number Date 60965 NSP Name Check Number 60966 ORTHOPEDIC SURGICAL CONSULTANT 60966 lO-Mar-00 ORTHOPEDIC SURGICAL CONSULTANT Totals Check Number 60966 ORTHOPEDIC SURGICAL CONSULTANT Check Number 60967 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY 60967 09-Mar-00 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY Totals Oieck Number 60967 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY Check Number 60968 PIONEER 60968 60968 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 PIONEER PIONEER Totals Check Number 60968 PIONEER Check Number 60969 POHERCLEAN COMPANY INC. 60969 60969 09-Mar-00 09-Mar-00 PONBICLEAN COMPANY INC. POHERCLEAN COMPANY INC. Totals Check Number 60969 POHERCLEAN COMPANY INC. Check Number 60970 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS 60970 09-Mar-00 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS Totals Check Number 60970 precision business systems Check Number 60971 RADIO SHACK 60971 08-Mar-00 RADIO SHACK Transaction Amount 658.00 658.00 85.69 85.69 78.64 22.62 101.26 947.92 775.56 1,723.48 53.25 53.25 42.58 Page 10 CofTRients 6C965 08-Mar-00 NSP 122.99 ELEC-HMY 12/HILLOR 60965 lO-Mar-00 NSP 170.05 ELECTRICITY LSIO 60965 lO-Mar-00 NSP 1,435.51 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60965 lO-Mar-00 NSP 692.31 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60965 lO-Mar-00 NSP 9.42 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60965 lO-Mar-00 NSP 320.84 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60965 lO-Mar-00 NSP 25.93 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60965 lO-Mar-00 NSP 3,078.79 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60965 lO-Mar-00 NSP 1,392.27 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 60965 lO-Mar-00 NSP 183.57 ELECTRICAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 60965 NSP 8,654.05 THQMPTON 4/99 HIRE, THIN HOSE LAND USE APPLICATIONS NOT IMPR-FOX RDG SAN SHR JANITORIAL SERVIC 2/00 JANITORIAL SERVIC 2/00 HEADSET HEAD CLNR, VIDEO ERASER i 10 Mar 2000 Fri 12:28 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60971 RADIO SHACK Totals Check Number 60971 RADIO SHACK Check Number 60972 REED VENDING 60972 09-Mar-00 REED VENDING Totals Check Number 60972 REED VENDING Check Number 60973 RICKS SUPERVALUE 60973 60973 60973 60973 60973 lO-Mar-00 lO-Mar-00 lO-Mar-00 lO-Mar-00 10 Mar-00 RICKS SUPERVALUE RICKS SUPBRVALUE RICKS SUPBRVALUE RICKS SUPERVALUE RICKS SUPBRVALUE Totals Check Number 60973 RICKS SUPBRVALUE Check Number 60974 RIDGBDALE ELECTRIC. INC 60974 lO-Mar-00 RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC. INC Totals Check Number 60974 RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC. INC Check Number 40975 RITZ CAMERA 60975 60975 60975 lO-Mar-00 lO-Mar-00 lO-Mar-00 RITZ CAMERA RITZ CAMERA RITZ CAMERA Totals Check Number 60975 RITZ CAMERA Check Number 60976 SA-AG INC. 60976 60976 09-Mar-00 09-Mar-00 SA-AG INC. SA-AG INC. Totals Oieck Number 60976 SA-AG INC. Check Number 60977 SIGNS OP THE SEASON 60977 60977 09-Mar-00 09-Mar-00 SIGNS OF THE SEASON SIGNS OF THE SEASON Totals Check Number 60977 SIGNS OP THE SEASON Check Number 60979 SNYDER DRUG STORES 60978 lO-Mar-00 SNYDER DRUG STORES Transaction Amount 42.58 69.80 69.80 6.68 8.83 11.30 11.31 35.00 73.12 2.236.97 2.236.97 13.33 7.82 10.37 31.52 1.091.53 1.690.72 2.782.25 67.93 95.85 163.78 4.77 Page ll Comments O)NCESSI0NS- SLEDDING COCOA COCOA BALANCE ON ACCT BALANCE ON ACCT Y2X SUPPLIES LIGHT POLE CTY RD 15 FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING SAND SAND VEHICLE SIGN VEHICLE SIGN PHOTO PROCESSING 4 . ■ ■ itiTi 11 i 'Uteif -------------------------- ------------------------------- ■ -hfl—if i ii jtt i iif ■ ‘■‘■“ha i nil i ■ —■ i n 10 Mar 2000 Check Register Frl 12:28 PM City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Aifiount Comments Check Number 60978 SNYDER DRUG STORES 60978 lO-Mar-00 SNYDER DRUG STORES 41.49 BATTERIES 60978 lO-Mar-00 SNYDER DRUG STORES 6.34 PUFFS 60978 lO-Mar-00 SNYDER DRUG STORES 25.02 FILM 50978 lO-Mar-00 SNYDER DRUG STORES 3.07 MEMO BK. LABELS 60978 lO-Mar-00 SNYDER DRUG STORES 14.37 FILM Page 12 Totals Check Number 60978 SNYDER DRUG STORES Check Number 60979 SOUTHRN POLICE INST ALUM ASSC 60979 09-Mar-00 SOUTHRN POLICE INST ALUM ASSC Totals Check Number 60979 SOUTHRN POLICE INST ALUM ASSC Check Number 60980 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 60980 09-Mar-00 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY Totals Check Number 60980 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY Oieck Number 60981 THE HOME DEPOT 60981 09-har-00 THE HOME DEPOT Totals Check Number 60981 THE HOME DEPOT Check Number 60982 TOLL GAS k MELDING SUPPLY 60982 09-Har-00 TOLL GAS k MELDING SUPPLY Totals Check Number 60982 TOLL GAS k MELDING SUPPLY Check Number 60983 TRUXSTOR 60983 09-Mar-00 TRUXSTOR Totals Check Number 60983 TRUXS"DR Check Number 60984 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 60984 60984 60984 lO-Mar-00 lO-Mar-00 10-Mar-OO UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UrXIMITED Totals Check Number 60984 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Oieck Number 60985 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 60985 09-Mar-00 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 95.06 75.00 75.00 400.00 400.00 §5.55 85.55 5.66 5.66 73.49 73.49 41.95 26.95 95.30 164.20 1.800.00 GANG AMARNESS TRNQ 1ST HALF 2000 MEMBERSHIP MET/DRY VAC CYLINDER RENTAL PENDA MAT PANTS - TCMC2YK GLOVES • MimCB PANTS - HENDRICKS POSTAGE FCR METER I i \ f : 10 Mar 2000 Fri 12:28 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 13 Check Number Date Name Check Number 60985 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 60985 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Check Number 60986 US WEST COMM1 60986 08-Mar-00 US 60986 08-Mar-00 US 60986 08-Mar-00 US 60986 08-Mar-00 US 60986 08-Mar-OO US 60986 08-Mar-00 US 60986 08-Mar-00 US 60986 08-Mar-00 US Totals Check Number 60986 US COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS OMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS Check Number 60987 60987 VILLAGE CHEVROLET 09-Mar-00 VILLAGE CHEVROLET Totals Check Number 60987 VILLAGE CHEVROLET Check Number 60988 N.N. GRAINGER INC. €0988 09-Mar-OO N.N. GRAINGBl INC. Totals Check Number 60988 M.H. GRAINGER INC. Check Number 60989 WARNING LITES OP MN 60989 09-Mar-00 WARNING LITES OF Ml Totals Check Number 60989 WARNING LITES OF MN Check Nusa>er 60990 WHEELER LUMBER 60990 lO-Mar-00 WHEELER LUMBER Totals Check Number 60990 WHEELER LUMBER Check Number 60991 YOCUM OIL CO INC. 60991 60991 09-Mar-00 09-Mar-00 YOCUM OIL CO INC. YOCUM OIL CO INC. Totals Check Nui^r 60991 YOCUM OIL CO INC. Check Number 60992 YOUNG. JACKIE Transaction Amount 1.800.00 338.23 Comments 54.22 PHONE - WATER PLANT 44.61 ALARM DIALER-LS 86 913.75 PHONE SERVICE-CITY HAU. 30.46 PHONE SERVICE-CITY HALL 71.07 PHONE SERVICE-CITY HALL 60.22 PHONE - GOLF COURSE 329.70 DIRECTORY ADVERTISING 79.00 COM LINE-WT TO PW 1.583.03 28.80 HANDLE. NOZZLE 28.80 71.25 THEROSTAT 71.25 101.92 BARRICADES 101.92 282.41 GAURD RAIL POSTS 282.41 147.02 FUEL OIL 191.21 FUEL OIL V $ ^ 10 Nar 2000 Check Register Pri 12:28 PM City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comnents Check Number 60992 YOUNQ«JACKIE 60992 09-Mar-00 YOUNG, JACKIE 125.00 CONS MEETING 1/20 60992 09-Mar-00 YOUNG, JACKIE 25.00 CONS MEETING 2/3 60992 09-Mar-00 YOUNG, JACKIE 150.00 PARKS com 2/7 60992 09-Mar-00 YOUNG, JACKIE 125.00 CONS MEETING 2/10 60992 09-Har-00 YOUNG, JACKIE 175.00 PLANNING COM 2/23 60992 09-Har-00 YOUNG, JACKIE 150.00 cm COONCIL 2/28 60992 09-Mar-00 YOUNG, JACKIE 125.00 CONS MEETING 2/29 Page 14 Totals Check Number 60992 YOUNG, JACKIE 875.00 3 j Grand Total 120,027.34 .•i 7 Mar 2000 Tue 10:44 AM Check Register City of Orono Check :hiniber Employee Heme Check Number 047265 047265 JOHNSON* MRRY ANN Totals Check Number 047265 Check Number 047266 047266 BERRY* HEIDI N. Totals Check Number 047266 Check Number 047267 047267 HASBMAN* CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 047267 Oieck Number 047266 047268 MOORSE* RONALD J. Totals Check Number 047268 Check Number 047269 047269 VBE* LINDA S. Totals Check Number 047269 Check Number 047270 047270 KUEHN* THOMAS M. Totals Qieck Number 047270 Check Number 047271 047271 OISOH, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 047271 Check Number 047272 047272 PETTIT, SANDRA K. Totals Check Number 047272 Check Number 047273 Check Date 08-Kar-00 OI-Mar-OO 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar*00 08-Mar-00 08-Har-00 08-Mar-00 Page 1 Check Amount 794.86 794.86 705.96 705.96 751.21 751.21 1,654.78 1,654.78 1,158.59 1,158.59 1,376.14 1,376.14 4.70 4.70 368.02 368.02 '♦ J U ■. . .1. •• • ^ -5] I .. r--iim ■ r mrWlimrt'Trrv t ‘■inn'TiriTiiTfcl^ I'l \1kt m»\ -nri n in iruUMffii ii«ii liftN 7 Mar 2000 Tue 10:44 AM Check Regieter City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 047273 047273 ANDERSON, BRUCE L. Totala Check Number 047273 Check Number 047274 047274 BOBZIEN, SUB A. Totals Qieck Number 047274 Check Number 047275 047275 BORIS, SCOTT M. Totals Check Number 04727S Check Number 047276 047276 BUDIQ, STACIE M. Totals Check Number 047276 Check Number 047277 047277 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. Totals Check Number 047277 Check Number 047278 047278 aSSNICX, GARY B. Totals Check Number 047278 Check Number 047279 047279 CORNICK, JAMBS L. Totals Check Number 047279 Check Number 047280 047280 DEMBOUSICl, JAY C. Totals Check Nundber 047280 Check Humber 047281 047281 ERICKSON, KURT R Check Date 08-Mar>00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 i fiav.w> vLi .IL Page 2 Check Aaount 753.43 753.43 753.50 753.50 1,149.78 1,149.78 591.24 591.24 245.85 245.85 1.543.37 1.543.37 1,534.71 1,534.71 1.352.34 1.352.34 1,277.03 • i 4i .34 mi te- iB^:- -i. 7 Mar 2000 Tua 10:44 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employe# Name Check Number 047281 Totals Check Number 047281 Check Number 047282 047282 FARNIOK, CORREY L. Totals Check Number 047282 Check Number 047283 047283 PISCKENICH, DAN T. Totals Check Number 047283 Check Number 047284 047284 PISCHBR, CHRISTOPHER K. Totals Check Number 047284 Check Number 047285 047285 JOHNSON, JEFFREY Totals Check Number 047285 Check Number 047286 047286 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 047286 Check Number 047287 047287 MADSON, ADRIENNE M. Totals Check Number 047287 Check Number 047268 047288 MCNALLY, STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 047288 Check Number 047289 047289 HCNICHOLS, DAVID L. Check Date 08-Mar-00 oe-Mar-00 08-Har-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 Page 3 Check Amount 1,277.03 1,298.65 1,298.65 1,301.95 1,301.95 1,154.10 1,154.10 946.54 946.54 1,270.86 1,270.86 637.74 637.74 1,204.97 1,204.97 638.28 ■ 4 'X , ^ ■ngnrhrfTfurifTlrrlW. ■ III rai 7 Mar 2000 Tua 10:44 AM Check Number Employee Name Check Register City of Orono Check Date Page 4 Check Amount Check Number 047289 Totals Check Number 047289 Check Number 047290 047290 M0R0lfCZYN5ICl« JAMES Totals Check Number 047290 Qieck Number 047291 047291 PERSELL, WILLIAM R. Totals Check Number 047291 Check Number 047292 047292 SCHOBNHOFP, JOHN B. Totals Check Number 047292 Check Number 047293 047293 TOHCHBCK, LAWRENCE P. Totals Check Number 047293 Check Number 047294 047294 TOMCZYK, MARK W. Totals Check Number 047294 Check Number 047295 047295 WITTKE, ANTHONY A. Totals Check Number 047295 Check Number 047296 047296 HENDRICKS* RONALD J. Totals Check Nundoer 047296 Check Number 047297 047297 JENSEN, CHRISTOPHER E. Totals Check Number 047297 Q8-Mar-00 08-Mar-OO 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar*00 638.28 1*525.43 1*525.43 483.70 483.70 1*340.53 1,340.53 452.09 452.09 1*284.23 1*284.23 881.99 881.99 578.29 578.29 317.31 317.31 7 Mar 2000 Tue 10:44 AM Qieck Register City of Orono Check Number Bnployee Nsme Check Number 047296 047298 BOTTENBERG, WENDY C. Totals Check Number 047298 Check Number 047299 047299 DAVIS, NARK L. Totals Check Number 047299 Check Number 047300 047300 QAPPRON, MICHAEL P. Totals Check Number 047300 Check Number 047301 047301 GAPPA, GRBQCmY A. Totals Check Number 047301 Check Number 047302 047302 MEYER, WILLIAM C. Totals Check Number 047302 Check Number 047303 047303 OMAN, LYLE E. Totals Check Number 047303 Check Number 047304 047304 PENCE, CHRXSTOPHBl M. Totals Check Number 047304 Check Number 047305 047305 WEINBERGER, PAUL E. Totals Check Number 047305 Check Number 047306 047306 BRINKHAUS, JOHN P Check Date 08-Mar-00 06-Nar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 Oi-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 Page 5 Check Amount 1,047.85 1,047.85 1,081.98 1,081.98 1,181.11 1,181.11 1.638.94 1.638.94 517.91 517.91 476.62 476.82 873.37 873.37 1,165.36 1,165.36 1,065.67 1 . .* V"’- »> 'V , 0 V \r ■■ ■' ' . : > 7 Mar 2000 Tue 10:44 AM Check Register City of Orono Check NUnber Employee Vane Check Number 047306 Totals Check Number 047306 Check Number 047307 047307 DBBABRB, DONALD L. Totals Check Number 047307 Check Number 047306 047308 GREGORY, JAMES D. Totals Check Number 047308 Check Number 047309 047309 HANSEN, STEVEN Totals Check Number 047309 Check Number 047310 047310 OBERAIGNER, SCOTT G. Totals Check Number 047310 Check Number 047311 047311 OBRIEN, RANDY L. Totals Check Number 047311 Check Number 047312 047312 PALMER, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 047312 Check Number 047313 047313 RATHBUH, BARRY J. Totals Check Number 047313 Check Number 047314 047314 SKREEN, DALE S. Check Date 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Kar-OO 08-Har-00 Page 6 Check Amount 1,065.67 826.72 626.72 607.93 607.93 906.07 906.07 548.66 548.66 256.03 256.03 758.81 758.81 1,089.26 1,089.26 897.79 i 7 Mar 2000 Tue 10:44 AM Check Regieter City of Orono Page 7 Check Number Bmplcyee Name Check Date Check Amount Check Number 047314 Totals Check Number 047314 Check Number 047315 047315 STBFFENKAGEN, RONALD E. Totals Check Number 047315 09-Mar-00 3rand Total 7 Mar 3000 TUa Ui33 AM Cheek Register City of Orono Check HUnber Date Name Check Ihunber 00119 00889 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 08-Mar-00 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Totala Check Number 00889 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Number 00890 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 00890 00890 00890 08-Mar-00 08*Mar-00 08-Mar-00 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Totals Check Number 00890 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES ^eck Number 00891 IC34A RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 00891 08-Mar-00 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST • 457 Totals Check Number 00891 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Check Number 00892 LAN ENFOROIENT LABOR SERVICE 00892 08-Mar-00 LAN ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Totala Check Number 00892 LAN ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Check Number 00893 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT 00893 08-Mar-00 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Totals Check N^^^r 00893 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Check Humber 00894 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 00894 08-Mar-00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Totala Check Number 00894 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Check Number 00895 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRU5TEE/CU5T 00895 08-Mar-00 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTBB/CUST Totals Check Number 00895 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTBB/CUST Check Number 00890 PESr.:>Q><'O0^^ 00890 08*Mar-00 PEBSCO/OBRA Totals Check Number 00896 PEBSCO/OBRA Transaction Amount 0,949.00 0,949.00 3,847.39 3,847.39 9,254.70 10,949.48 300.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 179.51 179.51 3,577.51 3,577.51 2,130.08 2,130.08 0.00 0.00 Page l Cofnents SAVINGS N/H a TRANSFERRED FICA a MEDICARE N/H FICA,I<SDCR CITY SHARE FEDERAL NITHHOLDINQ DEFERRED COMP N/H UNION DUBS NH Simsm 10010755723 STATE TAX N/H DEFCOMP-9* > 85-01 D180 OBRA DEFERRED COMP N/H i r .1 f I' mk\ 1 Mar 2000 Tua 11:33 AM Chack Ragiatar City of Orono Chock Data Kama Chack MusrJbar €0197 60197 PBBSCO/US COUP OF MAYORS 06-Mar-00 FBB5C0/0S CONF OF MAYORS Totala Chack Numbar 60897 PBBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS Chock Muahar 60890 PBRA 60898 60898 08-Mar-OO 08-Kar-00 PBRR PCRA Totals Chock Nunbor 60898 PBRA Chack Nuabar 60899 UNITED NAY 60899 08-Mar-00 UNITED NAY Totals Chack Nunbor 60899 UNITED NAY Chock NUB^r 60900 NISCONSIN SCTP 60900 08-Mar-00 NISCONSIN SCTF Totals Chock NUnbor 60900 NISCONSIN SCTP Grand Total m:.'fK V ' i r- n m ■ :. S.■i- Transaction Amount 2,658.00 2,658.00 4,465.09 5,792.11 10,257.20 28.00 28.00 184.62 184.62 43,220.00 m!L Paga 2 Conmanta USCM DEFERRED COMP N/H PERA EMPLOYEE N/H PERA CITY SHARE CHARITY DONATIONS N/H JOHNSON- 0002 7568 98 8 Mar 2000 Wed 9til AM Check Register City of Orono Check Mumber Date Name Check Number 60551 60551 CITY OP ORONO GOLF COURSE 08-Mar-00 CITY OP ORONO GOLF COURSE Totals Check Number 60551 CITY OF ORONO GOLF COURSE Check Number 60552 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 60552 60552 60552 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 08-Mar-00 mn dept of revenue KN DEPT OF REVENUE MN DEPT OF REVENUE Totals Check Number 60552 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Iheck Number 60554 COMP USA 60554 08-Mar-00 COMP USA Totals Check Number 60554 COMP USA 2rand Total Transaction Amount 100.00 100.00 19.00 223.00 -76.00 166.00 212.97 212.97 1,870.23 Page 2 Comments CHANGE FUND-SLEDDING SALES TAX 12/99 SALES TAX 12/99 SALES TAX 12/99 MAXTOR lOQ HARD DRIVES r « a • ..1,. Jill.- -tw 8 Har 2000 Ned 9:49 AM Check Check Register City of Orono Page 1 Totals Check Nunber 60556 D*VINCIS Check Number 60557 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 60557 08-Mar-00 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 60557 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Check Number 60558 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE 60558 08-Mar-00 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE Totals Check Number 60558 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE Check Number 60559 DCA 60559 08-Mar-00 DCA Transaction Number [>ate Name Amoxmt Comments Check Number 60379 Ml DEPT 01F TRANSPORTATION 60379 08-Mar-00 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION -195.45 VOID CHECK 60379 Totals Check Number 60379 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION -195.45 Check Number 60553 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 60553 08*Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 7.80 JANUARY LIFE 60553 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 5.85 JANUARY LIFE 60553 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 35.10 JANUARY LIFE 60553 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 13.65 JANUARY LIFE 60553 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 3.90 JANUARY LIFE 605S3 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 15.60 JANUARY LIFE 60553 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 1.95 JANUARY LIFE 60553 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 446.65 JANUARY LIFE 60553 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 33.90 JANUARY LIFE Totals Check Number 60553 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 564.40 Check Number 60555 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 60555 oo-Mar-00 MN DEPT OP REVENUE 3.00 SALES TAX 1/00 60555 08-Mar-00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 5.00 SALES TAX 1/00 60555 08-Mar-00 MN DEPT OP REVENUE 444.00 SALES TAX 1/00 60555 08-Mar-00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 41.00 SALES TAX 1/00 Totals Check Number 60555 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 493.00 Check Number 60556 D*VINCIS 60556 08-Mar-00 D'VINCIS 73.10 PIZZAS-CONS WORK 73.10 373.79 373.79 220.00 220.00 POSTAGE-CONS NEWSLETTER MUN CLERKS CONF - PETTIT 30.00 SHORT PAYMENT 1/31 S Mar 2000 Med 9t49 AH Check Register City of Orono Check number Date Name Check Number 60559 DCA Totals Check Number 60559 DCA rheck Number 60560 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE Check Number 60606 LAKE MINNETONKA PICTURE CO Grand Total Transaction Amount 30.00 1«483.84 Page 2 Comments 60560 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 7.80 LIFE INSURANCE 2/00 60560 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 5.85 LIFE INSURANCE 2/00 60560 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 37.05 LIFE INSURANCE 2/00 60560 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 13.65 LIFE INSURANCE 2/00 60560 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 3.90 LIFE INSURANCE 2/00 60560 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 15.60 LIFE INSURANCE 2/00 60560 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 1.95 LIFE INSURANCE 2/00 60560 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 473.35 LIFE INSURANCE 2/00 60560 08-Mar-00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 16.45 LIFE INSURANCE 2/00 Totals Check Number 60560 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE 575.60 60606 08-Mar-00 LAKE MINNETONKA PICTURE CO -226.00 VOID CHECK 60606 Totals Check Number 60606 LAKE MINNETONKA PICTURE CO -226.00 Check Number 60685 BUDGET PRINTING • 60685 08-Mar-00 BUDGET PRINTING -5.24 VOID CK •6068S 60685 08-Mar-00 BUDGET PRINTING -185.34 VOID CK •60685 60685 08-Mar-OO BUDGET PRINTING -121.39 VOID CK •60685 60685 08-Mar-00 BUDGET PRINTING -112.63 VOID CK •60685 Totals Check Number 60685 BUDGET PRINTING -424.60 7 Mar 2000 Tua 2:28 PM Check Regiater City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 047317 047317 PETERSON, BARBARA Totale Check Number 047317 Check Number 047318 047318 MOORSE, RONALD J. Totale Check Number 047318 Check Number 047319 047319 FLINT, RICHARD Total! Oieck Number 047319 Check Number 047320 047320 JABBOOR, GABRIEL E. Totale Check Number 047320 Check Number 047321 047321 KELLEY, CHARLES Totale Check Number 047321 Check Number 047322 047322 SANSEVERE, ROBERT K. Totale Check Number 047322 Grand Total Check Data 13-Mar-00 13>Mar-00 13-Mar-OO 13-Mar-OO 13-Mar-OO 13-Mar-OO Page 1 Check Amount 269.36 269.36 277.05 277.05 269.36 269.36 323.22 323.22 269.36 269.36 269.36 269.36 1,677.71 4'e _ INFORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COI IMTil. MKETINO MAR 1 3 2000 OF Cti Y Uh UHCNVU L km—k . ■-■M-T JiA AWkt a a I COIIMCII. meeting MAR 1 3 2000 CU Y Oh OHOMO March 13,1999 To: Mayor Jabbour and Council Members From: Greg Gappa Subject: Narrows Dock Lots Attached you will find several letters from the neighborhood residents regarding this issue. The residents have requested that the public meeting scheduled for March 27* be postponed until May because the key property owner, Mr. Donald Ogle, is not available until then. We were informed of this concern after the meeting notice letters were sent out. We would like to receive Council direction regarding the scheduling of this meeting. 1 pib 7.1MP'2.3 3-4 00 * ..»b LJ^J^ ' I \ \ \ i ' T/' ^ {& |t* \ / / fell (2.\1 (2.0 K / 1 jtf’ieciyiiOO. • ^:»*r#?c^ fifS i I WiimrAM^ • * c:>0’-< // \ ^ / •- -'— — — — -^^^>/. / ; I • \ ^ _ .-./ 3111 T»<»ro»«>i^ Avtf . ^evust»«. f.o. COK *eO,I>«t^«5 • TtIMTl 4 ^ T . WMS nffl • *Tii».«i Oi f Wl-rTfrtA/J 5H«>/u)oot> ■/ /V fi»8i SuutivaJ “tiA J Cou/.yA£/A 5^s^2.\ \ ^/ / syrr TK/st 0(-CL^ ^ S.MiJ^feUlSOCi S S \\ • TfifcTS a»4M 7^0S Ch\ifp<Jvi/r\ / . -nuc. e <L M<J 5530 ()0VVl4 VJ.»l»H'5'be W, IJAVZ^cTA 277 1 rV*£i.YVJaA /( \ / ' \ i / / / Cortccfn 77/is 75 />; • ntvtJT ^S’mtVf R2C3V2D March 8,2000 im 0 9 2GQ0 TO: Mike Gaffron Greg Gappa 11 <ur Ufi0i\0 FROM: Jim Zimmerman, the Ogle’s, the Gay ’s SUBJECT: Non-Resident Dock Issue E Following b a summary of our position based on the meeting at City Hall between Greg Gappa, Mike Ga^on, Richard Gay and Jim Zimmerman. Also included are commenb from Dick Ogle based on a briefing of last Friday ’s meeting and hb hbtorical ^rspective of the issue. Dick was present for and part of the 1985 discussions and Council meeting that dealt with the 1985 conditional use permib. The conditional use permib are very clear about parking. There are 3 dock owners that are allowed only one car and it is very specific where the cars are to park. Dick Ogle indicates that in 1985 there was significant discussion about parking and it w*as agreed that parking was to be limited to one car per slip with ns parking on the road. The shoulders on both sides are turn lanes for the driveways as well as bike traib and have never been intended for parking for non resident boat docks or neighborhood residenb. For many years the non-resident dock owners lived up to their agreemenb from the conditional use permib and there was no problem. They parked the one car they were entitled to in front of their dock as required and things worked out fine. It’s important to reiterate that tliere have never been written easemenb for this area and there has never been a problem. The papenvork in place today is exactly what it has been for 15 years and none of the non-resident dock owners has ever raised an issue. I am also certain that no dock owner can ever cite a single example of being prevented access to their dock. The only reason that parking ever became an issue is that the non-resident dock owners in recent years have consistently and substantially abused the parking restrictions they agreed to. The neighborhood would haN-e never had to come to the city with our safety concerns about the parking along County Road 19 if the non-resident dock owners had lived up to their agreemenb. Over the past few years there have been increasingly more ars parked along County Road 19, creating an enormous safety hazard for bikers as well as neighbors that need to use those lanes to safely exit and enter from the road from driveways. This information was all documented to the city, including pictures that showed the level of car parking and the safety hazard. It’s important to note that these cars were there strictly as overflow for the non-resident dock ovMiers. The cars that were parked on County Road 19 were in addition to at least three cars parked on the right of way where they should be parked. It’s very clear that the reason the non-resident dock owners continue to approach the city about the parking issue is that thqr want to find a way to park multiple cars per slip. As stated earlier, there has never l^en an issue with having access to the parking spaces designated in the conditional use permits. The issue has only arisen from the non-resident dock owners expanding parking beyond what is authorized and approved. When the City Council met last Fall and discussed this issue, the agreements were as follows: • The safety issue of parking on County Road 19 was a significant issue and the area should continue to remain no parking. There seemed to be unanimous agreement on this point, and certainly nothing has changed since last Fall that would now make it safe to park on County Road 19. • The Council asked that the neighbors and non-resident dock owners meet to discuss the parking issue. We did that last Fall and both groups were in agreement about how the 3 cars that were allowed to be parked could be parked. We talked about adding gravel to the roadway and asked the non-resident dock owners to trim the bushes back so Aere would be easy access to the three parking spaces. From the neighborhood perspective it was very clear from that meeting that Aere was no problem whatsoever in accommodating the three paridng spaces that were allowed by permit. We felt comfortable that we had done what the city had asked us to do and that the issue was put to bed. One thing that’s been clear from the discussions at the City Council as well as our discussions with the non-resident dock owners is that Meigel in particular does not want to abide by the one car restriction that was agreed to for these docks. He has indicated that he and the woman he boats with come from different directions and they need to park two cars at their dock. BecauM of that, they continue to push eveiy angle and option to get around the one car restriction that’s tied by permit to their dock. This latest attempt at asking for parking permits along County Road 19 is just one more attempt to accomplish his objective of being able to park multiple cars for his boat. \Ve’re quite confident that if permits were issued, he’d request 2 to 4 citing the fact that he has multiple cars and needs multiple permits. We’re also quite confident that if those permits were issued, on any given weekend, Meigel would have 1-2 cars parked along County Road 19 plus a car in front of his dock. This isn’t about making sure that he has the right to park the one car he’s entitled to, it’s about his trying to find a way to expand the parking rights he was granted in the conditional use permit that governs his dock. Summary To summarize, the key points of this issue are as follows: • The paperwork in place today in terms of permits and easements is exactly the same as it has been for the past 15 years. ■ During that time there has never been an issue of non-resident dock owners getting to and having access to the one parking spot they’re entitled to. • The non-resident dock owners have consistently and increasingly violated the agreement on one car parking which created a significant safety and nuisance issue prompting the neighborhood to petition the city for help. • The city agreed with the safety issue and designated the area along County Road 19 as a no parking area. • The non-resident dock owners asked the city to readdress the no parking issue, which was done at a city council meeting. The city once again agreed that there was a significant safety issue and left the no-parking restriction in place. The Council asked the neighbors and dock ovoiers to address the parking situation, which we did last Fall. At that time we gU agreed how the one car per slip (or total of 3 authorized) could be easily accomplished. As a neighborhood, we did what the city asked us to do and resolved the issue to everyone’s satisfaction. At last Fall’s Council meeting, one of the Council members summed up the situation very well. In addressing one of the non-resident owners, he told him that these properties were very unusual in Orono and were all non-conforming lots. Because they were non-conforming, they had special restrictions that had to be adhered to. He suggested ^at the one car condition man(kted for the boat slip was appropriate for this area and that the dock owners needed to conform to the requirements of the conditional use permits. It was suggested to the dock owner that there were hundreds of properties in Orono that would allow the parking of niultiple cars and if that were critical to this dock owner they should look at purchasing a home in Orono or other community that would provide for multiple car parking, but that that wouldn’t be possible with this property. As neighbors, we agree wholeheartedly with that point of view. There are marinas and homes on Ae lake that would accommodate their parking needs, but we feel that the permits governing these docks were well thought out as relates to parking, and we would not support any change or amendment in parking for non-resident dock owners. the city nee^ to accommodate the non-resident dock owners. Their parking rights are clearly spelled out in their conditional use permits and they have never once been denied their right to park the one car diey are allotted. As a neighborhood, we are vigorously opposed to increasing or expanding the parking for the non-resident dock owners and we would ask that the city vigorously enforce the parking restrictions set forth in the conditional use permits. Further, we see no need to once again address the parking issue that has already been addressed twice by the City Council. As far as we’re concerned, the issue has been resolved per the direction of the City Council. If, however, the City Council wants to address this issue for a third time, we’d ask that it be postponed until at least May when the Ogle’s return home. Without them, any discussion about the dock properties cannot be very productive since their property is the one Uiat controls all the others. R2C3VSD March 8,2000 MAR 0 9 2GQ0 TO: MikeGaffron Greg Gappa GJ1 1 or 0h0i\'0 FROM: Jim Zimmerman, the Ogle’s, the Gay ’s SUBJECT: Non-Resident Dock Issue Following is a summary of our position based on the meeting at City Hall between Greg Gappa, M:<e Gaffiron, Richard Gay and Jim Zimmerman. Also included are comments from Dick Ogle based on a briefing of last Friday ’s meeting and his historical perspective of the issue. Dick was present for and part of the 1985 discussions and Council meeting that dealt with the 1985 conditional use permits. The conditional use permits are very clear about parking. There are 3 dock owners that are allowed only one car and it is very specific where the cars are to park. Dick Ogle indicates that in 1983 there wes significant discussion about parking and it was agreed that parking was to be limited to one car pe; slip with np parking on the road. The shoulders on both sides are turn lanes for the driveways as well as bike trails and have never been intended for parking for non resident boat docks or neighborhood residents. For many years the non-resident dock owners lived up to their agreements from the conditional use permits and there was no problem. They parked the one car they were entitled to in front of their dock as required and things worked out fine. It’s important to reiterate that there have never been written easements for this area and there has never been a problem. The paperwork in place today is exactly what it has been for 15 years and none of die non-resident dock owners has ever raised an issue. I am also certain that no dock owner can ever cite a single example of being prevented access to their dock. The only reason that parking ever became an issue is that the non-resident dock owners in recent years have consistently and substantially abused the parking restrictions they agreed to. The neighborhood would have never had to come to the city with our safety concerns about the parking along County Road 19 if the non-resident dock owners had lived up to their agreements. Over the past few years there have been increasingly more cars parked along County Road 19, creating an enormous safety hazard for bikers as well as neighbors that need to use those lanes to safely exit and enter from the road from driveways. This information was all documented to the city, including pictures that showed the level of car parking and the safety hazard. It’s important to note that these cars w'ere there strictly as overflow for the non-resident dock owners. The cars that were parked on County Road 19 were in addition to at least three cars parked on the right of way where they should be parked. i It’s veiy clear that the reason the non-resident dock owners continue to approach the city about the parking issue is that they want to find a way to park multiple cars per slip. As stated earlier, there has never been an issue with having access to the parking spaces designated in the conditional use permits. The issue has only arisen from the non-resident dock owners expan^ng parking beyond what is authorized and approved. When the City Council met last Fall and discussed this issue, the agreements were as follows: ■ The safety issue of parking on County Road 19 was a significant issue and the area should continue to remain no parking. There seemed to be unanimous agreement on this point, and certainly nothing has changed since last Fall that would now make it safe to park on County Road 19. • The Council asked that the neighbors and non-resident dock owners meet to discuss the parking issue. We did that last Fall and both groups were in agreement about how the 3 cars that were allowed to be parked could be parked. We talked about adding gravel to the roadway and asked the non-resident dock owners to trim the bushes back so there would be easy access to the three parking spaces. From the neighborhood perspective it was very clear from that meeting that Aere was no problem whatsoever in accommcmating the three parldng spaces that were allowed by permit. We felt comfortable that we had done what the city had asked us to do and that the issue was put to bed. One thing that’s been clear from the discussions at the City Council as well as our discussions with the non-resident dock owners is that Meigel in particular does not want to abide by the one car restriction that was agreed to for these docks. He has indicated that he and the woman he boats with come from different directions and they need to park tw’o cars at their dock. Because of that, they continue to push every angle arid option to get around the one car restriction that’s tied by permit to their dock. This latest attempt at asking for parking permits along County Road 19 is just one more attempt to accomplish his objective of being able to park multiple cars for his boat. We’re quite confident that if permits were issued, he’d request 2 to 4 citing the fact that he has multiple cars and needs multiple permits. We’re also quite confident that if those permits were issued, on any given weekend, Meigel would have 1-2 cars parked along County Road 19 plus a car in front of his dock. This isn’t about making sure that he has the right to park the one car he’s entitled to, it’s about his trying to find a way to expand the parking rights he was granted in the conditional use permit that governs his dock. Summary To summarize, the key points of this issue are as follows: ■ The paperwork in place today in terms of permits and easements is exactly the same as it has been for the past 15 years. • During that time there has never been an issue of non-resident dock owners getting to and having access to the one parking spot they’re entitled to. ■ The non-resident dock owners have consistently and increasingly violated the agreement on one car parking which created a significant safety' and nuisance issue prompting the neighborhood to petition the city for help. • The city' agreed with the safety issue and designated the area along County' Road 19 as a no parking area. - The non-resident dock ow'ners asked the city' to readdress the no parking issue, which was done at a city council meeting. The city once again agreed that there w'as a significant safety issue and left the no-parking restriction in place. The Council asked the neighbors and dock owners to address the parking situation, which we did last Fall. At that time we all agreed how the one car per slip (or total of 3 authorized) could be easily accomplished. As a neighborhood, we did what the city asked us to do and resolved the issue to everyone ’s satisfaction. At last Fall ’s Council meeting, one of the Council members summed up the situation very well. In addressing one of the non-resident owners, he told him that these properties were very unusual in Orono and were all non-conforming lots. Because they were non-conforming, they had special restrictions that had to be adhered to. He suggested ^at the one car condition mandated for the boat slip was appropriate for this area and that the dock owners needed to conform to the requirements of the conditional »ise permits. It was suggested to the d^k owner that there were hundreds of properties in Orono that would allow the parking of multiple cars and if that were critical to thU dock owner they should look at purchasing a home in Orono or other community that would provide for multiple car parking, but that that wouldn ’t be possible with this property. As neighbors, we agree v v.vleheartedly with that point of view. There are marinas and homes on the lake that would accommodate their parking needs, but we feel that the permits governing these docks were well thought out as relates to parking, and we would not support any change or amendment in parldng for non-resident dock owners. Frankly, from our perspective, it’s very frustrating that the City Council will be addressing this issue for yet a third time. We can ’t honestly understand why there is such a strong feeling that the city needs to accommodate the non-resident dock owners. Their parking rights are clearly spelled out in their conditional use permits and they have never once been denied their right to park the one car they are allotted. As a neighborhood, we are vigorously opposed to increasing or expanding the parking for the non-resident dock owners and we would ask that the city vigorously enforce the parking restrictions set forth in the conditional use permits. Further, we see no need to once again address the parking issue that has already been addressed twice by the City Council. As far as we’re concerned, the issue has been resolved per the direction of the City Council. If, however, the City Council w-ants to address this issue for a third time, we’d ask that it be postponed until at least May when the Ogle's return home. Without them, any discussion about the dock properties cannot be very productive since their property is the one that controls all the others. r Government Trolning Service I 480 Cedar Streer Suite 401 a Saint Paul. Minnesota 55101 -2240 'COUNCIL MAR 1 3 2000 Cll Y Uh OrtUHU Ronald Moorse Admin - Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 First Class Mail U.S. POSTAGE PAID St. Paul, MN Permit No. 3137 RECEIVED MAR 0 1 2000 Cl l Y Ur OROiMO These workshops are for gou . . . REGISTER TODAY: SPACE IS LIMITEOI LAND USE PLANNING WORKSHOPS FOR PmHIIIIC COMMISgiWiaiS AMD tlCCfBI OFHims March - Mag, 2000 - VARIOUS LOCATIONS Annual Planning InsNIules <* Beyond The Basics •t* Advanced Zoning Appilcalions <* Environmental Planning and Compliance NEW THIS YEARII Building Community Character Sponsored by: GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE Co-sponsors: Association of Minnesota Counties. League of Minnesota Cities. Metropolitan Council. Minnesota Association qt Townships. Minnesota Chapter. American Planning Association GENERAL INFORMATION We ore pleased to once again offer workshops designed especlallu for citizen planners This year’s sessions provide opportunities for in-depth study of current topics and hands-on application. Participants will enhance their knowledge of various areas of planning and. as a result, become better equipped to make recommendations and decisions about the communities in which they live. PROGRAM FEATURES INCLUDE An accomplished faculty with extensive backgrounds in both planning and instruction ^ A Focus on current issues and timely information Reference materials to make your job easier •> Practical workshops designed by a committee of planning experts and local officials If you would like to make your contribution to solving land use problems as informed and effective as possible^RECISTER TOOAYI THESE PROGRAMS ARE FOR YOU. WHO SHOULD AHENO? Members of planning commissions, boards of adjustment and appeals, and governing bodies in Minnesota cities, counties and townships. Also valuable for members of other advisory commissions, housing and redevelopment authorities, staff, real estate professionals, and others working in areas related to specialized workshop topics. REAL ESTATE CREDITS "Annual RannIng Institutes' and ‘Beyond the Basics* has been approved for Continuing Real Estate Education credits. Application is pending for the 'Advanced Zoning Workshops.' In addition, application has been made for Continuing '..egal Education 'real property' credit tor each of these courses. Approval is pending. REGISTRATION/CANCELUTIDN Register at least 7 days prior to the workshop date using the forms in this brochure. (Space is limited.) Rll out one form per individual; duplicate forms if registering more than one person from your community/agency. You will not receive confirmation; but we will notify you if the session you requested Is full. Fees will be refunded less a S1 5 service fee if the registration is canceled 3 working days before the program. You may substitute another individual for a workshop at any time. Should weather (or circumstances beyond our control) necessitate program cancellation or postponement, registrants will be notified via announcements on WCCO-AM radio and other local Minnesota radio stations. FEES The registration fee for each workshop is SBB/persoa A special group discount rate of $B5/person is available for organizations registering three or more people for any of these courses. Both fees include a luncheon meal, refreshment breaks and handout materials IMPORTANT: To qualify for the group discount, registrations must be mailed in the same envelopel FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Contact Government Training Service Carol Schoeneck (6511 222-7409 or Minnesota Toll Free (BOO) 569-6BB0. If fiL' I About GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVIC& Conteience FBCiHlalDr: GTS partners with Minnesota ’s public sector organizations to provide innovative, comprehensive, practical conference, training and consulting services It is governed by representatives of ihe Association of Minnesota Counties League of Minnesota Giles Minnesota Association of Townships Minnesota Regional Development Organizations Minnesota School Boards AssoclaHoa Minnesota State Colleges and Universities State of Minnesota and Ihe University of Minnesota. ______ ANNUAL PLANNWC INSTITUTE: THE BASICS a:aBBB BBSBB Wednesday, March 29 Sr. Cloud Thursday. April 20 Brooklyn Center Thursday. March 30 Salurday. April I Grand Rapids Brooklyn Center Workshop: 9:00 a.m • 4:30 p.m. (Rnal check-(n: 8:30 am| NUTS AND BOLTS OF PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION REGULATION For Those New lo Land Use Planning or Interested in a Review of Fundamentals: The History, the Process, the Results ❖ Implementation. Exercising Authority, Zoning/Subdivision Ordinances. Amendments, Permits. Enforcement ^ Legal Limitations. Avoiding LiligoHon. Planning, Zoning and Subdivision Laws. *0ue Process*. Conducting a Roper Public Hearing and Recording Your Rndings Who Participates in the Ranning and Zoning Process and Where Oo You Rt in How to Maximize Your Impact as a Commissioner, Membership Responsibilities HandS'On SImulaHons of Actual Planning and Zoning Dilemmas. Hot Issues. Answers to Your Questions FACULTY Wllltam Griffith. A“orney. Hoffman, Daly & Unogren Roderf Lockyear. Director of Plan- *g and Public Affairs. Washington County This course has been approved far lonhouing Real Estate Education Creditl BEYOND THE BASICS Solurday, April 8 Willmar Thursday, April 13 St. Cloud Thursday, May 4 Brooklyn Center Workshop: 9:00 a.m. • 4:30 p.m. (final check-in: 8:30 am| PLANNING IN DEPTH For Those Who Have General Knowledge of the Planning Process or Have Attended the Annual Ranning Institute: The Basics Overview of Land Use Tools and Standards, ^ Review the History of Land Use Regulation. Source and Limitations of Authority to Plan and Zone. Community Participation Fundamental Legal Principles and Subdivision Regulations Comprehensive Ran Elements In Depth Advanced Zoning Applications, Explore Innovative Ways b Guide Land Use Deveiopment Learn about Reparing and Using Planning Tools b Deal with a Wide Variety of Development Roblems ^ An In-depth Review of the Ranning Rocess, from Proper Legal Notice b Development of Rndings of Fact Small Group Sessions Applying Ranning and Zoning Rincipies. Hands-on Aclivilies Examine the Legai Issues in Depth. What Are Takings? Appiying the Principles. Living with the 6D Day Limit Brief Dverview of Minnesota's Environmental Review Program - EAW. EIS. AUAR ^ Praclicai Advice Answers b Your Questions, Discussion - Discover Shorbuts to Avoid Rtfalls FACULTY Karen Cole. Afror'i^. Kennedy & Craven Phil Carlson. Ranning Co.nLuirc “’ Dahlgren. Shardlow and Udan, Inc Ths course has Oeen approved fo' lonhnumg Real Estate Education credit Ifik IK0-BS9B ■ 1 r-i ^ r-1 lll^894:338 BUILOtNC COMMUNITY CHARACTER Thursday. April 1 2 Brooklyn Center Workshop: 9:00 OJa • A:30 pm (Anal check-ln: 8:30 am) BUILDING AND MAINTAINING COMMUNITY CHARAaER This workshop focuses on rwhat makes up communltu chorodet and practical ways to enhance It This is advanced planning which gets to the heart and fabric of the community and provides a framework for you to create outstanding places to tive. to ptay and to work, in Ihis workshop you will learn how to: Identify and define the important characteristics of your community Turn naturat assets into community treasures Use neighborhoods, business districis. streets, porks and even highways as character building elements. ^ Use character zoning and performance standards to turn your community plan into reality. ^ Hetp your dtizens discover how they can enhance their community's vitality Think big but move ahead with realistic steps Includes *nuls and bolts' presentoNons on such topics as cultural resources, the lifestyte impact of changing demographics and specific zoning tools, plus small group sessions designed to help you apply what you've learned to hypothelical (and your own!) situations. Join us for a vvorkshop designed to be thoughNprovoking. useful and fun learning experience! CORE FACULTY Dick Krier, Ranning & Zoning Administrator. City of Minnetonka Beach Karen Gill-Gerbig. Laboratory Director & Program Associate. Center tor Anthropology and Cultural Heritage Education. Hamline University and Councilmember. City of Lauderdale Rus presentations by a variety of subject matter experts W0PK5H0P 5IT65 All workshop sites are accessible to persons with disabitities and have free parking for participants. A small sleeping room block has been reserved at most sites indicated below. Participants needing such overnight accommodations should moke reservations directly with thn facility. Mention the “Land Use Planning Workshop' when making reservations to obtain these special rotes! Mrooklyn Center <M0rc mssamaojjensiBfrOTprv^xsScrrra's/' Eorie Btown Heritage Center 6t5S Earle Brown Drive 11-9^ and Shingle Creek Parkwagl Brooklyn Center. MN S5d30 612/569-6300 Sleeping Room Rate: 590*tax AnnudI Planning Institute: The Basics Beyond the Basics Advanced Zoning Applications Maintaining Community Character April I & April BO May^ May I 7 April 12 Grand Rapids Sawmill Inn 230 1 South Pokegama Avenue Grand Rapids. MN 557dA 2 1B/326-B501 Sleeping Room Rote; 559+tax Annual Ranning Institute The Basics March 30 Wllimar Holiday Inn & Conference Center 2 100 East Highway 12 Wllimar. MN 56201 Sleeping Room Rate: SSS-f-tax Beyond the Basics April 8 St. Cloud Radlsson Suite Hotel dOA West St. Germain St. Cloud. MN 56301 320/65A-I66I Advanced Zoning Applications Environmental Ranning & Compliance Sleeping Room Rate: SSS-ftax May 3 April 6 Best Western Kelly Inn Highway 23 & Ath Avenue South P.O. Box t066 St. Cloud. MN 56302 320/259-B11 3 Sleeping Room Rate $50+ta x Beyond the Basics April 13 Annual Ranmng Institute: The Basics March 29 Owatonna Ramado Inn 1212 North Interstate 35 (intersection of # 1 4 and #351 Owatonna. MN 55060 507/455-0606 Sleeping Room Rate: $52-t-tax Advanced Zoning Applications April 19 CUSTOMIZE A BRING A WORKSHOP TO YOUR COMMUNITYI Government Training Service can tailor any of these workshops to meet the cixrent needs of your community and bring the program to you. You choose the date and location, we provide Ihe faculty and materialsl Benefits of this customized approach to land use training include: You choose the topics to be addressed by faculty- ensuring that current key community Issues are covered. ^ A diverse group from your community can attend at a far lower cost than sending them to the open enrollment workshops announced In this brochure. You are guaranteed a date and time convenient to the participants! CONSIDERING A GOAL-SEHING OR TEAM BUILDING SESSION? GTS can provide facilitators who have extensive experience working with local governments like yours to lead a session for your governing body and/or advisory commission! We can facilitate a process to gather citizen input, set goals, guide problem solving, help prioritize scarce resources, make budget decisions, or help strengthen existing teams. This professional, objective assistance can be especially beneficial in limes of tough decisions. Conracf Mary Sadatke (651/222-7409. Minnesota toll free 800/569-6880 or e-mail msabalkeOmnQfs.orQl Contact Carol Schoeneck at GTS (65 1 /222-7409. Minnesota toll free 800/569-6880 or e-mail cschoenecksmngtsorg) to explore the possidilihes. fpr all the details 2000 LAND USE PLANNING WORKSHOPS - March-May Registration Form IRease pnnt or type Form should he PuplicdteP when regislenng more than one personlJ Name ______________________________________________Title__________________i Jurisdiclion/Agency Street Address___ Oty___________ How long in this position? State Daytime Phone.Pax Number E-mail m BvaMablel Registration Options; ICheck all that apply): Annual Planning Institute: The Basic' □ March 29 - 5t Cloud □ March 30 - Grand Rapids □ April 1 - Brooklyn Center Q April 20 - Brooklyn Center Beyond the Basics Q April 8 - Willmar □ April I 3 - St Cloud Q Mary 4 - Brooklyn Center Environmental Planning & Compliance □ April 6 - St Cloud Advanced Zoning Applications Q April 19 - Owatonna Q May 3 - St Cloud Q May 17 - Brooklyn Center Building Community Character □ April 12 - Brooklyn Center Payment Options; □ Enclosed g check #_______ 5 __________(payao/e to Oavennent Tm^ning SeMcei in the amount of □ Rease dill me at adove address; PO # (if appiicadlel NOTE: An $8/agencg Pilling fee will Pe added to the amount owed Special Needs iMust Pe received at leasi two weeks oetore the seminar for which you are registenngil: Q I have a dietary restriction (specify: 1 Q I require some ancillary aids lie. sign language interpreter, large print. Braille materials, etc). Rease contact me at (Circle one: VOICE or TTY) □ I require some other accommodations Rease contact me at (Circle one: VOICE or TTY) Return this form at least seven dags prior to the first workshop gou are attending to: Government Training Service. 480 Cedar Street, Suite 401. St. Paul. Minnesota 55101 -2240 lor fax to: 651 /223-5307f ADVANCED ZONING APPLICATIONS Wednesday, April 19 Owalonna Wednesday May 3 SI. Cloud Wednesday. May !7 Brooklyn Cenler Workshop: 9:00 a.m. - fl:30 p.m. Final Check-in: 8:30 a.m. Atote; The Owatonno and St Cloud sessions will Include special emphasis on mulll-JurisdIcHonal planning and regulaHon. The Brooklyn Center program v^ll provide more concentration on redevelopment planning. This workshop follows ‘The Basics" and ‘Beyond the Basics ” lo offer more depih into Land Use Issues. Learn how to manage more detailed and comprehensive issues such as: ^ Using Advanced Zoning Applicallons to Break Ouf of Ihe ‘Misuse of Variances Syndrome" •> Understanding the Proper Use and Limitations to the Use of Conditional Use Permits <• Establishing and Utilizing a Planned Use Development Ordinance that Provides Flexibility and Enhanced Control Understanding the Benefits Provided by Performance Zoning i* How to Approach the Regulation of Signs > How to Incorporate Urban Design Standards into Community Zoning Ordinances > How to Approach a Multi-JurisdicNonal Planning Study FACULTY John Shardlow, Pasdenr, Dahigren. Shardiow and Udan. inc; Planning Consultent Application r.25 deen made for Continuing Real Estate Education Credit. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING A COMPLIANCE WORKSHOP ~ LOOKING AT SUSTAINABILITY 5 S TLiKTlI^i Thursday. April 6 St. Cloud Workshop: 9.00 a.m. - <1:30 p.m. (Anal check-ln: 8:30 a.m.) This Workshop teaches the fundamentals of environmental compliance and environmental planning with an emphasis on making informed decisions regarding impacts to the natural and built environment. The course then illustrates the cumulative impacts man’s activities have had on the natural environment within the State of Minnesota. The course also discusses the local comprehensive plan and the benefihi of developing and implementing such plans in managing local and cultural resources. Learn Environmental Stewardship Principles and the Major Environmental Compliance Program Areas including: Air Quality Water Quality Solid Waste Hazardous Material Hazardous Waste Toxic Substances Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks Noise Pollution Pesticides Above Ground Storage Tanks Natural Resources Cultural Resources Land Use Brown Reids Get information on National. State and Local Environmental Laws. Regulations and Ordinances: The Community Based Planning Act Metropolitan Land Planning Act Minnesota ’s Environmental Policy Act National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Impact Statements Environmental Assessments Learn Environmental Compliance Strategies. Self-Evaluation. Program Management, and ‘Significanr Trends. FACULTY Ken Nimmer. P.'esiflenf. IMPACT Ranmng. Environmenfal Panner Cunnar Isberg. Cunnar isbe.g 8. Assooares, Planning Consuifanf, former city council member. planning commission member, and planning director Hannah Dunevitz. Regional Rant Ecologist. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources * -irMJ .'.i.'fA.L..LMilLliUttVTtE.*-. .r. .C -•-1/ ifc; 'i