Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01-24-2000 Council Packet
Public A ttendance Meeting D ate ' - :A'-l c (. ^ C ouncil □ Planning C ommission □ PARK C ommission □ Other ''v':V-' ^-'V-■:: •' X•• '' . y'-'‘' TEE INFORMATION ! RE<»^^ BELOW FOR OUR CDY RECORDS. .V-'- . ' ,, ‘ : . . ■ . ^ . Z v , .. . • '\v • NAME (please print>ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER 1. u/t~^ /v>X* rPr'C-. J_______________________ ____________________________ 2. \vsJoV ^0 2..I7S %.. hi"/ K^o.- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- fi - ------------------------------------------ 7.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8.. 9. 10.. 11.. 12. 13. 14.. -• ff 0913954 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING coi imcil MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10.2000 -----------------------------------------JAtl 2 4 » ROLL CALL Cl I Y Ul- UHOiWO The Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Richard Flint, Bob Sansevere, Charles Kelley, and Barbara Peterson. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Zoning Administrator/Planner Paul Weinberger and Recorder Lanette Wolf. Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. LONG LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION Fire Chief Steve Persian introduced the officers of the Long Lake Fire Department to the members of the City Council and thanked the Council members for their support during 1999. Mayor Jabbour asked about the redevelopment of Highway 12 and its affect on the location of a new fire station. Chief Persian stated that they are confident they can make the right decisions with all the right information and they are in a good position to move forward. Mayor Jabbour thanked Chief Persian and told him the Council members and the citizens of Orono appreciate what the Long Lake Fire Department does for them. CONSENT AGENDA (#2) APPROVE/AMEND Items 6, 12, 13, and 15 were added to the Consent Agenda. Flint moved. Peterson seconded, a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Jabbour moved, Flint seconded to amend the agenda by moving Item #9. Sewer Assessment/Cost Allocation Policy, to Item #5A. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#1) 7:00 P.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - EAST LONG LAKE SEWER PROJECT A.ORDER PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - RESOLUTION NO. 4407 Moorse stated that this is a project to bring sewer to a neighborhood on East Long Lake. Kellogg displayed a map showing the location of the systems that are failing, noncompliant and compliant. A preliminary feasibility study was prepared for this project and was Page I l-tlMlK, T in*'l 'A <k k M IB.I , -« .ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (#1) , EAST LONG LAKE SEWER PROJECT - Continued presented to the residents at a neighborhood meeting held on December 1*‘. Kellogg explained that two options for sewer were discussed at the neighborhood meeting. A gravity sewer option with a lift station at an estimated cost of $31,000 per unit was discussed. The residents were not interested in this option because of the high cost. The other option presented was for a pressure sewer system at an estimated assessment of $13,900. For this option, the property owners are required to purchase, operate and maintain their own residential grinder pump station. For other pressure sewer system projects, the property owners were allowed to include an allowance in the assessment for the purchase of their grinder pump station. If the residents decide to receive the $4,500 grinder pump allowance, the estimated per unit cost will be $18,400. He said there are some properties to the east that could be served by this system in the future. Kellogg said that six of the septic systems in this area are nonconforming to the 3-foot separation rule, with three of these systems failing because of surface discharges or cesspools. He said that most of the lots with conforming septic systems had new septic systems installed during the time period when the new septic regulations were enacted, and before the final decisions on the new sewer projects were made. Jabbour asked if this is an elective project where the residents are asking the City to put the sewer in and, therefore, the residents will pay the full cost of the system, Kellogg said that is correct. Mayor Jabbour opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Dick Rinehart, 985 Old Long Lake Road, said he is concerned about the delay in making a final decision on this project and the maintenance of a grinder pump. Jabbour explained the history of the sewer regulations. Rinehart said he would like to clarify a statement made earlier that tlie residents are demanding the project; therefore, they should bear the full brunt of the cost. He feels the City should share the cost. Jabbour said the City has decided there are two types of projects that it will do. One type is where the City has no choice but to force a project on the residents. The City would only assess an amount they could justify as a benefit to the property. The second type is where the residents petition the City for a sewer. In this case, the residents are assessed the full cost ot the sewer. Jabbour thinks $19,000 is a very justifiable assessment. He said that based on information he has gathered, future assessments in the two-acre zoning will be between $20,000 and $29,000 for a sewer svstem. Page 2 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (Ul) EAST LONG LAKE SEWER PROJECT - Continued Rinehart said two different systems are being discussed, one that costs twice as much as the other. If the City can provide a gravity system for $19,000 and a grinder system for $18,000, the gravity system is much preferred. Kelley said that the gravity system for this neighborhood would be $3 1,000 while the grinder system is $13,900, plus the $4,500 for the grinder pump. Jabbour said that most Cities would not assess the cost of the grinder pump. Sansevere said that some residents asked for exclusion from the project. He asked if Rinehart was one of those residents. Rinehart said no. He asked what would make the systems noncompliant in the future. Kelley said a compliant system could become noncompliant in the future if the MPCA regulations changed. If a resident that asked for exclusion from the project wants to connect to the sewer system in the future, that resident will have to pay his fair share plus the inflated cost as well. Rinehart asked how much right the residents have in saying whether or not a system is compliant. Kelley said that the City would inspect the system. Karen Anderson asked if installation of the grinder system and hooking up to the City's system are included in the $18,400. Kellogg said the proposed assessment of $13,900 provides for the trunk force main in the street and it provides for a service stub up to the property. The additional assessment of $4,500 is an allowance to the property owner to purchase the grinder pump, have it installed and to install a line from the pump to the service stub. The $4,500 may or may not cover all the cost. Anderson asked if there is an additional SAC hook-up charge. Kellogg said it would be approximately $1,050. Jabbour said that is a Metropolitan Council charge, not a City charge, and it is not covered by the assessment. Kellogg said there would also be a quarterly sewer charge for usage. Jabbour said the usage charge would change from year to year. Page 3 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (Ul) EAST LONG LAKE SEWER PROJECT - Continued Rinehart asked about the neighbors buying the pumps as a group and getting one contractor to install them and whether the City would be involved in that. Kellogg said it would be the responsibility of the residents to work together and get bids from contractors. Rinehart said he feels the City should contract for all the work rather than the residents doing it individually. Jabbour explained that the legal costs involved would make the project more expensive. Marjorie Beauchaine, 460 East Long Lake Road, asked if the City would provide a list of contractors. Moorse said the City staff cannot recommend any one contractor, but they would provide a list. The public hearing was closed at 7:35 p.m. Flint asked if the system would be adequate to provide sewer to the properties farther east on Long Lake Road. Kellogg said the size of this line would be adequate to provide sewer to the properties to the east. Flint moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4407 Ordering the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer Project. Peterson questioned the $1,700 connection fee that the City of Long Lake will require. Kellogg said that fee is included in the assessment. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (*#3) REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 13,1999 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of December 13,1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 4 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - James White Mr. White reported on the last Park Commission meeting. He said they talked at length about the Navarre Park budget. The estimates came in quite high and they are trying to reduce the budget. He displayed the proposed layout of the park and said the play area is the single most expensive item. The sidewalk will not be put in right away because there may be State funding available for the sidewalk in the future. He said the final report is not ready. Sansevere asked what kind of fence would be installed. White responded that they would not be adding any fencing at this time. Jabbour asked about the total cost for the project. White said the total cost is estimated at $114,000. He said the Park Commission is looking at a DNR grant that would pay one-half the cost of the project. White said the Commission also talked about the boundaries of the Saga Hill Park. He said Mr. Gappa did mark the boundaries and there is a map showing the boundary lines. Kelley asked how far apart the markers are located. White said he thinks they are probably 100 feet apart. Some are closer together than others. White said they also discussed the trail that will be installed in conjunction with the construction of Highway 12. The Commission would prefer a trail from Long Lake to Old Crystal Bay Road, but they would also like to include Stubbs Bay and go down to 6 to access Baker Park. Jabbour said the trails would be identified and worked on in the final design phase of the highway. Peterson asked about a dedication of Saga Hill. White said Gappa would be talking to Moorse about a dedication. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS None PUBLIC COMMENTS None Pages 1 a , i r »t- n r ' • -----------— - -A Jr^ ^fi ■ »t -na Htt Itivi ■ t ki •■leif la IM *i«ia ■•Mat ' t-t — i-a fi ■ r»i ita-waa ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (U4) #2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC., SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 6 AND WILLOW DRIVE NORTH - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 4408 Dave Newman, The Bancor Group, and Marty Campion, Project Engineer, were present. Weinberger presented the staff report. He said the Council approved the preliminary plat for the Bancor Group to develop the 58-acre site at the southwest corner of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. One of the conditions of approval was the requirement of City water service to the site. Council directed staff to prepare a preliminary plat approval resolution and to work with the developer regarding the City water service to the property. One of the primary reasons for that condition is fire protection for the property. He said there was discussion with the Council concerning the design of the system and the requirements of the system to not only provide fire protection to the site, but also to provide for future expansion of water services throughout this area. He displayed a map showing the location of the water service. Weinberger said the developer had presented a proposal to install what would be a combination of an 8-inch and a 4-inch line to serve the site with an 8-inch line coming into the development, serving a fire hydra.nt and supplying the rest of the subdivision to a point in the north and a point in the souiii with a 4-inch line. Because a 4-inch line would not be considered as the standard most cities w^ould accept for water service and especially for location of additional hydrants within the development, staff discussed with the developer the installation ot an 8-inch sy.stem throughout the entire development. The City’s policy is that developers construct and pay for necessary infrastructure that would serve the entire development. For future planning purposes and the ability to extend the water service and to possibly create a loop system from the water tower, the developer would have been required not only to extend water service just to certain individual lots within the development, but also for the extension. StalThas had discussions with the developer regarding the resr jnsibility and who will have to pay what portions within the development. Because it was staff s recommendation and the developer has indicated that the City would benefit most from the extension of the water ser\ ice lines to the north and the south, it is the developer’s position that the City of Orono should be responsible for that portion of the water ser\’ice as well. There is an 800-foot section between the Middle School and the west side of the Bancor property where a water service line would have to be extended to ser\ e the development. The developer has stated that this is an extension that serves the City more than the developer, although it is required in order to provide water service to the development. Staff has recommended that since it is a shared benefit, the costs be shared for the 800-foot section. Staff would also like to leave the opportunity open to upgrade the system throughout the entire Bancor site with a 12-inch water main. The upgrade to the 12-inch water main is something the City would use in order to maintain higher capacity throughout its system and also loop the system. It is staffs recommendation that that portion of the development would be the responsibility of the City of Orono and the developer would maintain the individual Pai'c 6 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 {M) #2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued costs, half the cost of an 8-inch line between the Middle School and the development and the 8- inch line only to serve what’s within the development as well as the placement of hydrants throughout. Newman reminded the Council that the developer does not think it is necessary’ to run municipal water to the site. He is concerned that they will be required to oversize the system to benefit other properties. Mistakenly, at the last meeting, everyone thought that water service was available within 50 feet of the site. Subsequently, they found out that the water ser\ ice is really about 800 feet away. He said that once they bring the water service the 800 feet to the property, they have to run it another 500 feet to get it to where it does any good. He is not objecting to paying for the 500 feet. He said there is still a strong argument that municipal water is not necessary. Because of that and the water service is located 800 feet away, they will ask the City to participate in the cost. They propose to bring the system in with an 8-inch line and then T off to the north and south and put a hydrant at each end. This would place a hydrant within 800 feet of each home. A 4-inch line will be used from the hydrants and then 1-inch service to each home. He said the difference between their proposal and the staff s proposal is about $60,000 in costs. Jabbour asked who owns the land where the 800 feet of line would run. Moorse said the school district owns it. Jabbour asked if staff considered running the water on the frontage road and having it available eventually for the entire commercial district. He wondered if the 800 feet would be a wise investment. Moorse said the 800 feet is a benefit to the City because the whole system will be looped to the water tower. Jabbour asked why the developer doesn’t think it is his responsibility to pay tor the 800 feet based on what is necessary for the development, not the City. Newman said they don’t feel that municipal water is necessar>' at all. If they are required to do it, they feel the City should be obligated to get it to the property line. They also feel that the assessments they are paying to the City obligate the City to get the water to their site. Jabbour asked if Newman thinks staff s recommendation is totally unreasonable. Newman said no, he could understand the logic. Jabbour said that if the Council asks the developer to provide additional water capacity tor the City ’s use. then the burden should not be solely on the developer. He said Orono s policy is to assess 100%. Page 7 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (#4) U2S22 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Newman said he understands staff s proposal is to split the cost of the 800 ’, the City would pay for the increments to the north and south and the City would pay for over sizing from 8 inches to 12 inches. He can’t say that is unfair. Flint agreed with Newman that the City should pay half the cost of installing the 800 feet of line from the Middle School property. Kelley agreed with Flint. Jabbour said he does have a problem with the City paying half the costs. If the City does pay for half of it, the costs should be reassessed to the properties in the area. Sansevere said he agrees with Jabbour. Kelley said he is willing to accept staff s recommendation. Newman said he is willing to accept staff s recommendation. Sansevere asked if this would set a bad precedent. Jabbour said no. He said! developer is meeting all the requirements of the City. The City is taking an opportunity from the development happening to get additional capacity from the pipe that will benefit the general public and the subdivision across the street. Kelley said the residents across the street will benefit because there will be a hydrant located near their property. Newman said staff has mentioned the possibility of upsizing the line and he would like direction in the near future as to whether the line should be upsized to 12 inches for the City’s benefit. Sansevere said he is still concerned about setting a bad precedent. Jabbour said the developer is paying the total cost ot the line. The City is only paying for the upsizing. Jabbour said that having a looped system is e.xtremely important to the City. Jabbour gave New man a copy of a letter from Kathy Johnstone. Johnstone is concerned about the size of the monuments at the entrances. Flint asked if Newman objected to putting in smaller monuments. Newman said he does not object to smaller sized monuments. He said they plan to make the entrances low key. They will not put in a median if the Council doesn’t want it. The Pages ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (#4) #2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued monuments will be part of the landscape plan. He can make the monuments small with a lower profile. Kelley said Greg Gappa should review the plan for traffic flow. Flint said he does not have strong feelings about the median. Newman said that as they are working with the landscape design, they might want to shift some of the lot lines to make a more direct trail system. He asked if the Council would object to this. There was no objection from the Council members. Flint said that paragraphs 8 and 10 talk about the timing of the construction of the private road. The Council had discussed the importance of the trail being built early in the project. He asked if paragraphs 8 and 10 should address the construction of the trail. Moorse said he thought there was a paragraph that indicates that the trails will be constructed before any homes are built. If not, it should be included now. Weinberger said it could be included in the Developer's Agreement. Flint asked about the width of the trail easement. He said that paragraph 16 states a 12’ trail easement shall be granted in favor of the City of Orono between Lots 7 and 8, but it doesn ’t talk about the width of the rest of the trau. Kelley said the rest of the trail goes right into the outlot. Weinberger said the trail easement would be taken over the entire outlot and the trails be developed as shown on the preliminary plan. He said the actual trail width would be 8 feet. Flint said paragraph 19 states "Subdivider shall plant boulevard trees along the private road per the requirements of Section 11.60, Subd. 2." He asked if the boulevard trees along 6 and along Willow would be part of the landscape plan. Weinberger said that is correct and that the landscape plan that was pro% ided had shown trees along the backs of the lots to buffer between Willow Drive, County Road 6 and the individual lots. They are required to plant a 2-inch diameter tree every 40 feet on the boulevard after the road is completed. Flint asked if the landscape plan is adequate for that. Page? i. ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (U4) #2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Weinberger said staff has not received a final landscape plan at this time. He said that one of the conditions of approval is that staff approve the landscape plan prior to final plat approval. The landscape plan will be made available to the Council at the time of the final plat. Flint asked if paragraph 13 is adequate if a light becomes necessary at the intersection of the private road and Willow Drive North. Kelley said it would be up to the Police Department and Street Department. Kelley moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4408 Approving Preliminary Plat and a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Residential Development for Willow View Located at the Southwest Corner of Count>- Road 6 and Willow Drive North, PID 28-118- 23 44 0001, File No. 2522, with the following modifications: 1. 2. Accept City Staffs recommendation for water service. Internal trails are to be constructed at the same time or prior to the co.nstruction of the homes. 3. Amend Paragraph 5, page 5 of 11, to state ’'w hen water serv ice is required to the north and to the east." Sansevere asked if, in the future, the Council is prepared to share the cost of any water lines, because every one is going to say they want a 4" line and the City will insist on an 8" line. Moorse said the City is not sharing the cost of the 8-inch line that is serving the development. The City is sharing the cost of the 8-inch line bringing water to the property line and allows the City to loop the water serv ice. Barrett said there is an old phrase in the law that might be oi ‘comfort to Mr. Sansevere which is that in the particular facts and circumstances of this application, this was a good resolution of the problem which may or may not require a generalized application in different circumstances. Jabbour thanked the applicants for their cooperation with the City and the neighbors. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#5) #2539 JOHN AND BECKI SUNDET, 684 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCES John Sundet, Applicant, and Corv' Mishovic, Katherine Taylor Homes, were present. Weinberger presented the staff report. He said this application is for variances at 684 Tonkawa Road. He displayed a diagram showing the existing conditions on the property. The property is a I.ake Minnetonka shoreland property subject to the hardcover regulations within Page 10 i ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10, 2000 (§5) U2539 JOHN AND BECKISUNDET, 684 TONKA WA ROAD - Contin ued the shoreland areas in Orono. There is an existing, detached garage located near Tonkav'a Road. The house is essentially a one-story rambler style house. The existing house is 1,007 square feet in size. The proposal is to develop the property by adding structure around the existing house. The applicants are proposing to increase the footprint area of the residence to 2,666 square feet, which is an increase in footprint of 1,659 square feet. Weinberger said also proposed is to extend the driveway to add an attached garage to the residence. He said that one of the conditions from the Planning Commission meeting was that staff and the developer work together on some of the drainage issues on the property. There is a serious concern about water running along the driveway, straight down the foundation of the house and into the lakeshore. There are concerns about treatment of the water. Another concern is the water that comes from adjacent properties. There have been several attempts to create an engineering plan that would allow the water to pass through the property with minimal impact on adjacent residences and the development on this property and would also include a filtration system to help treat the surface runoff before it enters 'be lakeshore. He said that long-term maintenance of the system by the property owner is a niain concern. Weinberger said that in addition to the drainage concerns, this proposal requires variances for hardcover on the lot and for additions in the average lakeshore setback. The hardcover in the 75 ’- 250 ’ setback would increase to 5,841 square feet (39.26%), where 5.201 square feet (34.96%) exists, and 3,710.5 square feet (25%) is allowed. The average lakeshore setback would require a variance to allow a 34 ’ encroachment. The proposed development would add one full story over what exists and would be located closer to the lakeshore. The proposal would be a very significant increase in structure and increase in massing along this portion of the lakeshore. This would be a larger home than the adjacent residences. Weinberger said staff recommends denial of this application based on the concerns relating to hardcover, the intent of the average lakeshore setback, and the vision of the Comprehensive Plan as to development around the lakeshore and trying to preserve a natural appearance. The Planning Commission did recommend approval of the plan. John Sundet stated he recognizes the difficulty in developing this property. He said he understands the issues raised by the City staff and he feels he has been responsive to those issues. I le was surprised to see that staff is recommending denial. He said that both of their neighbors support the project. He said they are going to eliminate 300 feet of hardcover from the 0-75 setback and the total project w ill reduce hardcover to 8.300 square feet. In terms of hardship, he feels it is a hardship to park a car 200 feet from the house. He said his wife has rheumatoid arthritis and that's why they want the master bedroom on the main floor of the house. Cory Mishovic, Katherine Taylor Homes, said the house will be taller, but they are not adding another floor. Page 11 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (#5) U2539 JOHN AND BECKISUNDET, 684 TONKA WA ROAD - Continued Sansevere asked the height of the existing house. Mishovic said part of the house would be half a flight higher than the rest of th ; house. The roof will go from a 5/12 pitch to a 10/12 pitch. Jabbour asked if it would be half a flight higher than the existing or the proposed. Mishovic said you would walk down from the garage into the house. Jabbour said Mr. Mishovic should talk about what presently exists. Mishovic showed the existing home and the existing roofline. Sansevere asked the height of the peak of the existing roof and what it will be after the project. Mishovic said the existing height is approximately 13 feet. Sansevere asked what the highest point will be when it is done. Mishovic said they would be adding another six feet. He said the neighbor would look over the top of the house. Jabbour said the new house would be roughly 18 feet higher than the highest point today. Jabbour explained the stormwater management issue. Sansevere asked if the DeVeaus have seen the drainage plan. Sundet said the drainage should not impact the DeVeaus property. Jabbour asked if there has been any consideration given to moving the house closer to the road because that would eliminate the hardcover problem. Mishovic said that then it would no longer be a remodel. Jabbour asked if they are really trying to save the old part of the house. Sundet said they are saving that part of the house. He said the main floor and low er level are staying pretty much intact. They are adding a master bedroom on the left side and an attached garage in the front. Page 12 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (#5) U2539 JOHN AND BECKISUNDET, 684 TONKA tVA ROAD - Continued Jabbour said if they pull the house away from the 75’ setback, they could still build everything iney need and not ask for any additional hardcover in the 75’-250’ setback. Flint said he feels this is too much height and too much footprint addition that close to the lake. Kelley said he concurred with Flint. Sansevere asked if the neighbors know the height the house would be. Sundet said they saw the plans. Mishovic e.xplained the position of the neighbors ’ houses and said he does not feel the height of the house will be a problem. Peterson asked if the water flow and the drainage system will have any detrimental impact on any trees that currently exist on either side of the house or on adjacent properties. Weinberger said there are some very mature trees and there is concern that grading will occur within 10 feet of some of the trees. There is always a potential that the grading could damage the root system of the trees. Most of the trees are located on the neighbor ’s property. Peterson said she concurs with Kelley and Flint. She is concerned with the amount of mass. Sansevere said he is concerned about the height of the house, not the square feet. He does not feel 2,600 square feet is too large. Jabbour said the problem is the size of the lot in proportion to the size of the building. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to deny Application for Variances, #2539, John and Becki Sundet, 684 Tonkawa Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays I (Sansevere objected). (#5A) SEWER ASSESSMENT/COST ALLOCATION POLICY Moorse presented the staff report. The Sewer Assessment/Cost Allocation Policy is being discussed partly in relation to the Fox Ridge Sewer Project where there was some discussion about the City financing a portion of a trunk line that could potentially serve some other properties. For neighborhoods where the extension of sewer was the only solution for existing and potential septic problems, the City set the assessment amount based on the amount of benefit to the property that could be defended against appeal. He said that in neighborhoods where the residents have requested a project, the residents pay 100% of the costs through assessments. He said it is staff s recommendation that the City’s assessment policy should continue to be that assessments are based on the benefit to the property. Page 13 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (#5A) SEWER ASSESSMENT/COST ALLOCA TION POLICY - Continued Also, where there is not a significant threat to public health, a sewer project should only be built if the property owners believe the full per unit cost of the project is equal to the per unit benefit of the project. Peterson said she concurs with staff s recommendation regarding the City ’s Sewer Assessment Policy. Kelley said he concurs with part of the staff recommendation. He said he is in favor of the City funding the trunk line costs, and all properties pay the trunk costs as a connection charge when they connect to the trunk line. Jabbour said he likes the current policy. He feels the residents of Fox Hill may have been lead to believe that the City will pay $60,000 of that project, but that is not true. He suggested the Council vote on the policy as it exists and direct staff to prepare a 20 or 50 year plan identifying some very major trunk lines, not smaller lines through neighborhoods. Moorse said that when other cities do a trunk line and they identify how their city is going to develop, they know that ever>’ house that develops in their city will have sewer. In Orono, there are many properties that currently have a septic system and an alternate site, so they may never hook up to the sewer system. Kelley said the City needs a 20 or 30-year plan showing where the trunk lines should be located. Flint said the City is planning a lot of sewer lines that are caused by the new rules that were adopted with the 3-foot separation. With the way the State and the County are changing tht rules all the time, he doesn’t know which set of rules the City should plan under. Orono ’s policy has been to go slow on sewers. If the City puts in some major trunk lines and has that kind of money tied up in them, the City will be changing its basic policy. Kelley said he concurs with Jabbour. He believes the State and County will get even more restrictive in the future, not less restrictive, about on-site septic. He feels that part of the City ’s policy should be a plan for 20 or 30 years down the road. He reviewed the areas that are now in the MUSA line. Jabbour said he just feels the Council left the citizens with the WTong impression. He said a two- inch force main is not a trunk line. Flint asked if Jabbour wants to see a plan that shows where trunk lines should be located only in the areas that the City knows will have to have sewer in the future. Jabbour said that is correct. Page 14 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (#5A) SEWER ASSESSMENT/COST ALLOCA TION POLICY - Continued Kelley said there should be a preliminary plan to sewer the City of Orono. That doesn’t mean the plan would have to be implemented, but the plan should exist. GafFron said he feels it is a good idea to have a plan for the future. Peterson said she doesn’t want a plan included in the policy. Kelley asked if the Fox Ridge issue should be referred to Tom Kellogg. Moorse said there are five properties on Brown Road that are nonconforming and will need sewer. There are also several properties that have new systems. He thinks it makes sense to contact those five property owners and ask them if they want to be included in the Fox Ridge sewer project. The ones that want City sewer can be included and that will reduce the cost to Fox Ridge. Jabbour requested that City staff contact the five properties, review the costs and then recontact the other residents in the project. Flint feels the current policy is unclear. Jabbour suggested the Council have a work session to discuss sewer and septic. Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt the Sewer Assessment/Cost Allocation Policy as stated in the staff memorandum dated January 5,2000 and to direct staff to arrange a work session where the City Engineer, Consulting Engineer and Septic Inspector are present to discuss a trunk line plan. Flint suggested the Council also look at p»* 'perties the Cit>* currently considers nonconforming. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT None ENGINEER REPORT Page 15 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 i*U6) REQUEST TO PURCHASE WATER MONITORING EQUIPMENT FOR NAVARRE PLANT Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the purchase of a DREL/2010 Basic Wafer Quality Laboratory from Hach Chemical Co. for S3,444.30. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve a budget adjustment for the 2000 Water Fund Capital Outlay Budget to fund the purchase of a DREL/2010 Basic Water Quality Laboratory for $3,444.30. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#7) REQUEST FOR SEWER - 809 BROWN ROAD NORTH Moorse presented the staff report. He said the City has received a request from the property owner at 809 North Brown Road for connection to sanitary sewer. Jabbour asked if it meets the City’s guideline. Moorse said it generally meets the City’s guideline, but it is now a vacant lot. It does have potential septic sites. The new Comprehensive Plan proposes a MUSA e.xpansion for this area. With the proposed future MUSA expansion, this property will be eligible for sewer in several years. Flint said if the City grants sewer to this property, there should be an agreement that it will not be subdivided. He said the $19,380 fee seems excessive, Moorse said that the prior project was subsidized. This connection charge would be unsubsidized. Flint asked if the City would have subsidized it at the time of the North Long Lake sewer project. Moorse said at that time, the City probably would not have subsidized it because the City had not made the decision that it was going to be in the MUSA and they have potential septic sites. Flint asked why they should pay more than the people that did it then. Jabbour said because this is the policy the City has adopted. Moorse said the way the City has treated people who are adjacent to the sewer line, is that they pay the connection charge when they connect. Jabbour explained the sewer policy. Kelley said this parcel has two lots. He asked if both lots would get sew er. Page 16 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (#7j REQUEST FOR SEWER - S09 BROWN ROAD NORTH - Continued The applicant said tlie lots have been combined. Kelley asked what the Council will do after this property is within the MUSA line and the property owner asks to subdivide the property. Flint said there should be an agreement that the property will not be subdivided. Kelley said he does not think that deed covenant should apply once this property is included in the MUSA line. The property owner should be allowed to subdivide after it is within the MUSA line. Kelley moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve use of one sewer unit for connection of 809 North Brown Road to sanitary sewer with the property owner responsible for all costs associated with the hookup, including the connection fee for the North Long Lake sewer project, and the City Engineer plan approval required. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#8) REQUEST FOR SEWER - 680 BROWN ROAD SOUTH Moorse presented the staff report. He said the City has received a request from the property owner at 680 South Brown Road for connection to sanitar>' sewer. This property is an existing developed lot with a noncompliant septic system. The total estimated assessment including the grinder pump allowance would be $26,460. Kelley moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve use of one sewer unit for connection of 680 Brown Road South to sanitary sewer with the property owner assessed for the costs, to be determined by the City Engineer. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#10) DECLARATION OF LOCAL JURISDICTION RE: ISTS - RESOLUTION NO. 4409 Gaffron presented the staff report. He said that Hennepin County has adopted an Ordinance for the Regulation of Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). The County Board requires that each municipality that will retain its own jurisdiction over ISTS must submit a formal statement to that effect prior to 1-1-2000. He said it is clearly the City’s intent to continue local jurisdiction over ISTS. He said that On Site Systems Manager Chris Pence is currently drafting City code revisions which will be submitted to the Council for review and adoption this winter, in order that the City's ordinances address all the recent changes in State regulations. It is staffs current understanding that the City codes must be no less restrictive than State and County- regulations. One potential impact is that Orono may have to require a nonconforming system replacement on a three-year time frame rather than the current seven- to ten-year time frame. Page 17 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (#10) DECLARA TION OF LOCAL JURISDICTION RE: ISTS - Continued Kelley questioned the time frame required by the State. Gaffron said the State statute does not require a specific time frame. They expect local governments to define the time frame. The County’s time frame is stricter than the City of Orono's. Kelley said that the State, when there is a nonconforming system because of the three-foot separation, has no time frame to bring that system into conformity. Jabbour said they leave it up to the City. Kelley said the City has a seven to ten year time frame, but the County now says the time limit is three years. Kelley said he does not agree with that. He suggested that the City send the County Board information on how the City of Orono reviews and inspects the septic systems and ask for a comfort letter from them saying the County doesn’t have the capacity to monitor all of these situations and giving the City the power to take care of the septic problems. Jabbour asked if the County is asking w hether the City will continue being the LGU on septic systems or if the City wants to default to the County. Gaffron said that is correct. Jabbour said the City wants to keep it. Moorse said the County wants everyone to upgrade w ithin three years and that is impossible. Jabbour said the City should not change its policy. Jabbour said the City should send a letter to the County stating that the City of Orono will continue to be the LGU, it has recently hired a septic inspector and is complying w ith the State regulations. Banett said Susan Palchick, Superv isor from Hennepin County, says in her letter that she is looking forward to submission of Orono’s updated ordinance to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. He asked what that means. Gaffron said the City ’s inspector is preparing revisions to the City ’s code that will meet the standards put out by the State recently. Barrett asked if they would conform to the Hennepin County ordinance. Gaffron said no. 1 Page 18 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10, 2000 (UlO) DECLARA TION OF LOCAL JURISDICTION RE: ISTS - Continued Jabbour said that Orono is presently complying with the MPCA regulations. Orono is substantially more restrictive on some of the regulations than the MPCA. Barrett asked if the City is agreeing, by this resolution, to conform its ordinance. Gaffron said this resolution is very focused. It says the City of Orono will maintain jurisdiction and it doesn’t commit to any of the issues about codes. Kelley moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4409 Declaring that the City of Orono Will Retain Jurisdiction Over Individual Sewage Treatment System Regulation, and directing staff to send a letter to Hennepin Count}' stating the City’s position. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#11) ANNUAL APPOINTMENTS - RESOLUTION NO. 4410 Jabbour suggested that Flint be named Acting Mayor for the year 2000. Peterson suggested that the State Bank of Long Lake be added to the list of Official Depositories/Investment Vendors. Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4410 Designating Selected Appointments for the Year 2000, naming Richard Flint Acting Mayor and adding the State Bank of Long Lake as an Official Depository of the City assuming they meet the statutory requirements. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#12) SELECTION OF DATE FOR 2000 LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to establish April 26, 2000 at 7:00 p.ni. as the date and time for the 2000 Local Board of Review meeting. V'OTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#13) PARK COMMISSION REAPPOINTMENT Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to reappoint Shcrokee Use to a three-year term on the Parks, Trails and Open Space Commission expiring on December 31,2002. (#14) ASSESSOR SERVICES CONTRACT Moorsc said the City’s agreement with Hennepin County for properly assessment serv ices expires on July 31, 2000. The City must make a decision by the end of February about whether the City wants to keep Hennepin County as its assessor for the next four years. Flint suggested that staff contact the prior assessor and see if he is still unwilling to serve. He thinks that person had better knowledge of lakeshore property than the County does. Page 19 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (U14) ASSESSOR SER VICES CONTRACT - Continued Jabbour said that person is engaged in a new business. Jabbour does not want to make a four-year commitment to the County at this time. The County is the City's assessor by default and he instmcted staff to tell the County that the City is defaulting to the County, with a contract or without a contract. (*#15) 2000 NON-UNION PAY SCHEDULE - RESOLUTION NO. 4411 Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4411 Approving Pay Plan Adjustments for Non-union City Employees for 2000. V’OTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#16) RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING KURT ERICKSON’S TWENTY YEARS OF SERVICE ON THE ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 4412 Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, approval of Resolution No. 4412 Recognizing Officer Kurt Erickson for Twenty Years of Dedicated Serv ice. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT None (*#17) LICENSES Flint moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to approve the following licenses: Residential Kennel License D. Brian Fulmer 3505 W. Wayzata Boulevard Tracey Morrow 3026 Casco Point Road Eric & Kristal Wilson 2683 North Shore Drive VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. One Day Gambling - Resolution No. 4413 Orono PTO Mid Winter Fun Fest - Orono Middle School Saturday, February 5,2000 Page 20 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 (*U17) LICENSES - Cantinued Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4413 Approving the Application of Orono PTO for a One Day Off-Site Gambling Permit. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#31) BILLS Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to adjourn the meeting at 1Q:40 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 21 . i -g I--- < 7 D33 ■M I 3 3 I) 0 3 i I ► I > 00 m ■n 8 8 o X 7i I- o o o o o o OP w — ^ -i* ^ in S n ^ S: 3 8 o X r o ®r-cS Oo H § ^ ^ ET !< Q. 5. no ii??S' OQ :i, 8§ •o s: M.s M 3? A 32 s;- 5's-OQ O • 3 'IOg; •<P- 8s b 53 OQ i '-i 25 §• Wqt o 3 CM •o 3 •< rva §• I I *I!' I 1 li- o o o o o o oIJ IJ t:j ij Ij i3 — ^ o o 00 ^ ^ 4* ^ II I I I I I O 2 X r* o J7 o ® 0 o S Ki U 4- 1 In oo o g go n 1*^ooo no V V. O r (/) l«- C/l (/> S (/) H r O f* « 2^ H Q R 2-5o vi m (/) n 5. > to —— v£) Hp ‘ 5 OS o C/J c/> r* o rr cr JO > oSI•2 *o >• m a. a r% O Jr* O 2. 6 a § V* R ^2. a ^ & o' 2:o o C#9 Zi •n cja > I* * Xo55d -i: KN i::: 3 H H (/> O 5 a <- a5* 5^ OQ O (IQ CO< o 5. S-5- §•5 no D (IQ o g - ?o •o •o c/) > T3•o r« P o' 3 sS JO 22 O 73a Hu> n n 2.^ < c n tr> “*-* n yg. p s^ Jut *T|o X 5 CL50 OiSrfc r* rtCL O •1 o CO 2 i. s 5' p ^ D iso 5fl •< ^ §s g o^3 V5: •<o 5no 5n LA ^ N wO 41 Ih l>J 1^ i/i L/i Ut Oi^ vO y v? r: 00r i*j O 4« Lli O JO O g,^ *-•J, ? a. o q V o o i. gr 8 3 s il rs r S 1; B "•B 5. g- a -• B •< o COo a •-I ^ !P r- a n ‘5* n PO P* CL ^ a o a —• p-,:? 90&l S=1 0 CO i. 1 •tJo JO H -;1 gf CO •-1 O. CD ? «-i OIB; S* CO sin g. Is 2 i(>§? H I® Si p 9d O C>5 |S 0.3 lv» LA n n 0 V »-• Vs H (/) 1 P 5 •or I *2; to *D • JO y,o no V V qIH O J, oo V C3a W) (/) ^2 JS ^ S-h o?? g §:' CO CO E V5 »-• ^ 5C Ni^ CA V O V, no V M V 8 •y CO t*l 90 OQ D C c: I?rj <W & ^ I O •1 •T3 3o D w H CO ii O no V5 H C/) S: ^ n o r y C/)>5•o y •o H 2 $ > S o ? w Is 90orr n r Ui pi" s-1pop.o ^ K ?r O >r 3 ?;• S4mIc/. OQ • ^ I |s5 P.i Sqm "II > 02 90 W0^4 S og <% o o •-A ii® •-I oy o to H 22 Q o K> ” a ^ S ^3is| f i 2. _ o pln o iln 5 S5 ^2 ? 3 5 5 'S S *^9-y o m R" N i_____rA__(Ol_ •»! r O m*”2 CniiMriii mfETING JAN 2 4 2000 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION u,, y or unuivO DATE: 1/24/00 ,.= 3ITEM NO. Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2450 Glenn Gronberg 325 North Willow Drive __________Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval Zoning District:RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District Exhibits: A B C D Resolution to Extend Preliminary Plat Resolution No. 4230 Approving Preliminary Plat Plat Map Staff Report (January 21, 1999) Summary of Request: On January ’ 25,1999 Glenn Gronberg received a Preliminary Plat approval for a two lot subdivision of property located at 325 North Willow Drive. Mr. Gronberg’s property is scheduled to be acquired by MnDot for the new Highway 12. Because the property likely will be acquired for the Highway 12 project, Mr. Gronberg has determined he is not in a position to complete the final plat. An applicant that has received preliminary plat approval has one year to complete the final plat. Mr. Gronberg has requested the City of Orono extend his preliminary approval for an additional year. The new expiration date for preliminary approval would be e.xtended to January 25,2001. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED. To approve or amend the enclosed resolution. ! i nr- K -iMTAl -<■ ! If Wl r I II HIH1 1^11 IIIw i i il—i» iwr f- ii ■ I A A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR A PLAT PROPOSED AT 325 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE FILE NO. 2450 WHEREAS, on January 25, 1999 the City Council of the City of Orono adopted Resolution No. 4230 granting preliminary plat approval of a plat proposed by applicants Glenn M. Gronberg and Sandra L. Gronberg involving the property located at 325 North Willow Drive; and 2000;and WHEREAS, the effective period of preliminary plat approval expires on January 25, WHEREAS, the applicants have advised the Council that they are not completing the plat because the property proposed for platting is subject to MnDot acquiring the property for the new Highway 12 extension; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono that the effective period of preliminary plat approval for Glenn M. and Sandra L. Gronberg ’s proposed plat of property located at 325 North Willow Drive as originally approved per the conditions of Resolution No. 4230, adopted on January 25,1999 is hereby extended to January 25, 2001. Page 1 of 2 r.r;fir 'i jwr-.. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 24th day of January, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of January, 2000, by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public I Page 2 of 2 B CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4-9, U r\ A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL 325 WILLOW DRIVE NORTH 71LENO.2450 WHEREAS, Glenn M. Gronberg and Sandra L. Gronberg, (hereinafter the "subdivider") on December 16,1998, filed a formal subdivision application with the City of Orono for approval of a two lot residential plat of property legally described as: Lot 3, Block 1, Spruce Acres, Hermepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 ct. seq. and the City of Orono ’s Zoning, Platting and On-Site Septic Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held ? public hearing on January 19, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportumty to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on January 25, 1999, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Glenn M. Gronberg and Sandra L. Gronberg noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. 3. The property contains a total of 5.07 acres, all considered dry buildable. The proposed plat contains two residential lots each meeting or exceeding the 2 acre minimum lot size. Lot 1 contains 2.68 acres, and Lot 2 contains 2.02 acres. 4. Lot 2 currently contains a residence that was constructed in 1988. 5.Access to all lots shall be provided by the existing Outlot A, Spruce Acres currently owned by the applicant. .37 acre Outlot A within the new subdivision Page 1 of 5 ^ -V CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 2 o'- 0 shall be joined with the existing outlet for the development of a private drive . to serve four lots. Lots 1 and 2 in the Spruce Acres subdivision and Lots 1 and 2 in the new subdivision. The existing private drive would not be required to be developed until a building permit is issued for Lot 1 within the new subdivision. Prior to a building permit being issued the private road shall be developed to City standards and opened as a private road with the City being granted access and utility easements over the entire outlot. 6. Primary and secondary septic sites have been identified and recorded on the Preliminary Plat dated January 25, 1999, by Mark S. Gronberg for Lots 1 and 2. 7. Lots 1 and 2 meet all lot area and width requirements, and are considered buildable. 8. Non-Orono wetlands are located on Lot 1. Covenants for Type II and VI wetlands shall be filed on the chain of title. 9. The lot is scheduled to be acquired by MnDot as part of the Highway 12 redevelopment. The site is planned to be developed into a stormwater retention pond for stormwater runoff in the locality. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application for Glenn W. Gronberg and Sandra L. Gronberg for the property located at 325 Willow Drive North per the survey dated January 25, 1999, by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. attached as "Exhibit A", subject to the following conditions: . , Applicant to dedicate drainage and utility easements 10' along the boundaries of the property and road outlot, and 5' along all internal lot lines. Applicant to develop covenant for Type II and VI wetlands located within Lot 1. The purpose of the covenant is to alert all future property owners of the need to protect the area if alterations are proposed to first obtain the necessi^’ approvals from the Corps of Engineers and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District before applying for approvals from the City of Orono. 1. 2. Page 2 of 5 ^.c> CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1 3. 4. 5. 6. n /• •. % Park dedication fee for Lot 1 shall be paid to the City. Prior to filing the plat with Hennepin County the property owner would be required to complete a title opinion on the lot proposed for subdivision. Stormwater drainage and BMP plans should be reviewed and approved by the MCWD and City Engineer prior to final plat approval. A Letter of Credit written to 150% of the costs sh^l be issued by the applic^t to the City for any drainage and grading plan required on the propeity, also for the development of the private road for access to North Willow Drive. Outlot A shall be given a new road name, and address ^signments for Lots 1 and 2 as well as Lots 1 and 2 in the Spruce Acres subdivision at the time the private road is completed. Developer's Agreement has been executed. Prior to new construction, future owners shall be responsible for staking and protecting the primary and alternate septic sites. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Planner/Zonmg Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of each month. 1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1” = 200'. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated January 25, 1999. B Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide ^ong all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. 8. 9. C. Name of plat. Page 3 of 5 CITYof ORONO •• •. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 2 £ 0 ■ 2.Legal documents required: A.Tide opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. B The applicant shall provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. C.Signed and executed Developer ’s Agreement and Letter of Credit for construction of the private road and drainage improvements. D. E. Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over Outlet A. Signed and executed covenants defining responsibility for constnictioii and maintenance of the road in Outlet A, defining future financial obligations of affected property owners. F.Signed and executed covenants for Type II and VI wetlands within Lot 1 3. Fees to be paid: Total due: S 200.00* A. Legal review and filing fees — $ 200.00 B.♦Park dedication fee of 8%, not to exceed $4,900, to be paid upon the filing of the final plat and associated documents. Page 4 of 5 CITYof ORONO RESOLUTION O^T[^E^C|TY COUNCIL NO. ________ mee Adopted by the City ting held this 25th day of Januar>', 1999. council of U.e City of Orono. MinnesoU a. . tegular ) ss. ) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ^ on this 25th day of The foregoing ve'TMWor& "le* »f cT Page 5 of 5 V i V-WT^ .* .* . I N B9»42* 20" E 22&92 S 90*00*00" E 4344M .............---iV..........................................................+——K.W2.1 S ~ -V .■ Vs r \ \ 1 \ / \ • • X .y V •>« . . ./.'. tna ». -f s •a^0»/-cM0«j« tu*rj4»/Ar /tj 0€t/Mrsrtm i ' ■/'A ^ / N L 0^\ *-\3 ^ - . \ » \ A.*.ru»MH r/nr X N \ i. S0 \ k •* .V!^» ^ V»v* ft ■ * ". « 1 f$T0^tK VH 1 . 1 ... r.* -*• 1 « ■'.r. Jt0ttc ..’MfA i i:i. .•K • • • • • ^ • w* " r 1 \ / • • ^ CQJ*— ; S 90*00'00" W I 064^51 EVERING WOODHAVIEN 1 to Application Date: 12/16/98 Completion Date: 12/31/98 Deadline Date: 4/30/99 TO:Mayor Jabbour and Members of the City Council Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator January 21,1999 SUBJECT: #2450 Glenn Gronberg 325 North Willow Drive Preliminary Subdivision Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IB 5.07 acres One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre) Application: The applicant has applied for a Preliminary Plat for a two-lot subdivision of a 5.07 acre site located off North Willow Drive. The lot does contain one house, owned by the applicant that would remain on Lot 2. The proposed area for subdivision is scheduled to be purchased by MnDot as part of the Highway 12 development plan along the existing railroad corridor. The plan has placed a stormwater pond over much of the subject lot (Note: "Exhibit M"). Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.28 RR-IB One Famih Rural Residential Zoning District Subd, 5 Area, Height. Lot Width and Yard Requirements. P) ^J3ts. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: ! Lot Area * Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 2 Acres 200’50'30’50 ’ U2450 Glenn Gronberg 325 North Wtllo^¥ Drive Preliminary Subdivision 1/25/99 Page I L iMTSOTJnTr Mirtiwnr^ ^ssvn^^^iws m [•TlT*TiTil [iJIWiW riTi¥ira [•llKOffill iril^ [•i«ni[i)iicii rtiiiniriRi munnmimni •niiri •IMiJIMildf •muir* [•mire ivmire [•MiTsl acirrrr r*fM^Tn»7*ikvur7i Access The existing 5.07 acre lot is served by a private driveway that serves two other lots. When the Spruce Acres Subdivision was approved in 1979 an outlet was created for the purposes of serving as a driveway for the three lots. The driveway was not built until the applicant's house was constructed in 1988. Prior to the construction of the house, access for Lot 1, Spruce Acres was by a private driveway with access directly to North Willow Drive. Lot 2 had a temporary easement across Lot 1 for the purposes of access. Resolution #1065 (September 11, 1979) approved the Spruce Acres Subdivision. A condition of the resolution was the private drive in Outlot A was not required to be developed until a building permit was issued for Lot 3. A copy of the Spruce Acres Plat is attached as "Exhibit G". Private streets serving 3 to 6 units require a platted right-of-way width of 50', and a minimum pavement width of 24'. A cul-de-sac should be constructed at the end of the new street to provide room for emergency vehicle turnaround. Providing a cul-de-sac at the western edge of Lot 2, and opening the entire private street would eliminate the requirement of 3 acres for the back lot. The lot would no longer be defined as a back lot, due to having direct access to a street. Lot 1 would only be required to be 2 acres. The existing access outlot is owned by the applicant. The property owners of 345 and 365 North Willow Drive have been provided easements over Outlot A for driveway purposes. The intent of creating the new outlot is to create a private road joining the adjacent Outlot A within the Spruce Acres Subdivision. The road would be required to be developed, including an 80' in diameter cul-de- sac, at the time Lot 1 would receive a building permit. The existing driveway arrangement would remain in place until that time. Septic The On-Site Systems Manager has reviewed the septic sites and has determined both the primary and alternate drainfield sites meet all City and State standards. The site evaluation was completed by Swedlund Septic Service. The existing sites located on Lot 2 are conforming systems and would not be impacted by the subdivision. Drainage City Engineer Tom Kellogg has reviewed the proposed plat. Engineer comments are included as "Exhibit I". The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has commented the site would be required to provide BMPs for storm water management. i^2450 Glenn Groftherg 325 SorthWilhw Drive Preliminary Subdivision 1/25/99 Page} Park Dedication The Park Commission reviewed this application at their January 4, 1999 meeting. The Park Cominission recommended the City collect one park dedication fee for one new lot. Lot Area and Size Lot Requirements Lot Area 2 Acres Lot 1 (2.69 Acres) Lot 2 (2.02 Acres) Lot Width 200* 172* 233' Front Yard 50' 50 ’ 96' Side Yard 30' 30' 43' Rear Yard 50 ’ 50 ’ 40.4' Lot 1 would be 172' where 200' is required for lot width. For Preliminary Subdivision approval a variance should be granted for this lot. The lot is .67 acre larger than Lot 2. The only other arrangement would be to extend the length of Outlot A 25' which would move the front yard setback line back far enough to meet the 200’ minimum requirement. Extending the length of the road would pose a risk to the proposed primary and alternate drainfield sites on Lot 1 . Easements The applicant would be required to dedicate drainage and utility easements 10’ along the boundaries of the property and road outl'Jt 5' along all internal property lines. A wetland appears on proposed lot 1. The applicant shaii covenant for Type 11 and VI wetlands within Lot 1. Proposed Highway 12 Development MnDot will be rerouting Highway 12 along the rail corridor located adjacent to the North side of the property. The plans include MnDot purchasing the entire property proposed for subdivision. The plan for the site, once acquired by the State, would be to develop it as a ponding area. The state would be purchasing all three lots located in the Spruce Acres Subdivision. A map illustrating die proposed ponding plan is included with this Report as "Exhibit M". M2450 Glenn Gronberg 32S \orth milow Drive Preliminary Subdivision 1/25/99 Page 4 i f I f Attachments A Application B Location Map C Site Topography D Plat Map E Section Map F Resolution Number 1065 - Approving Plat of Spruce Acres (9/11/79) G Plat of Spruce Acres H Preliminary Plat (12/11/98) I City Engineer Comments (12/30/98) J Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (12/30/98) K Septic Evaluation (12/31 /98) L Wetland Delineation Report (12/30/98) M MnDot Highway 12 Plan N Ordinance 122, Front Lot/Back Lot Standards O Property Owners List P Permit Record Q Planning Report PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Conunission recommended by a 5 to 0 vote to: Approve the variances as presented. Staff had prepared the Planning Commission Report based on an original plan that was amended after the applicant received the staff report. The proposed plan was reconunended for approval in concept without a recommendation for a variance for lot width. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the site plan as presented to the Planning Commission with a variance to Lot 1 allowing a 172 ’ front lot where 200' is required. Prior to Final Plat approval the applicant must complete the following: 1.Applicant to dedicate drainage and utility easements 10' along the boundaries of the property and road outlet, and 5' along all internal lot lines. U2450 Glenn Gronbtrg 325 North Willow Drive Preliminary Subdivision 1/25/99 Pages 2.Applicant to develop covenant for Type II and VI wetlands located within Lot 1. The purpose of the covenant is to alert all future property owners of the need to protect the area if alterations are proposed to first obtain the necessary approvals from the Corps of Engineers and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District before applying for approvals from the City of Orono. 3. 4. Park dedication fee for Lot 1 would be collected by the City if it is determined their would be a park impact if the lot is never developed. Complete a road maintenance agreement with neighboring property owners, and develop the new street as a private drive with a cul-de-sac. 5. 6. 7. Grant road and utility easements over the road outlot. Maintenance covenants shall be provided for road and drainage improvements. Prior to filing the plat with Hennepin County the property owner would be required to complete a title opinion on the lot proposed for subdivision. 8.Stormwater drainage and BMP plans should be reviewed and approved by the MCWD and City Engineer prior to final plat approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED To approve or amend the enclosed resolution. 1^2450 Glenn Gronherg 325 Sorth Willow Drive preliminary Subdivision 1/25/99 Pages Plecv.- .. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY ^ 1 PLAT APPROVAL . ^ VU cv '^ 325 WILLOW DRIVE NORTH 0« s ^ ^ FILE NO. 2450 WHEREAS, Glenn M. Gronberg and Sandra L. Gronberg, (hereinafter the "subdivider") on December 16,1998, filed a formal subdivision application with the City of Orono for approval of a two lot residential plat of property legally described as: Lot 3, Block 1, Spruce Acres, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono's Zoning, Platting and On-Site Septic Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 19, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application wer'^ given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on January 25, 1999, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Glenn M. Gronberg and Sandra L. Gronberg noting the following findings of fact: 1.The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. 3. The property contains a total of 5.07 acres, all considered dry buildable. The proposed plat contains two residential lots each meeting or exceeding the 2 acre minimum lot size. Lot 1 contains 2.69 acres, and Lot 2 contains 2.02 acres. 4. Lot 2 currently contains a residence that was constructed in 1988. 5.Access to all lots shall be provided by the existing Outlot A, Spruce Acres currently owned by the applicant. ,36 acre Outlot A within the new subdivision Page 1 of 5 6. shall be joined with the existing oullot for the development of a private drive to serve four lots. Lots 1 and 2 in the Spruce Ac s subdivision and Lots 1 and 2 in the new subdivision. The existing private drive would not be required to be developed until a building permit is issued for Lot 1 within the new subdivision. Prior to a building permit being issued the private road shall be developed to City standards and opened as a private road with the City being granted access and utility easements over the entire outlot. Primary and secondary septic sites have been identified and recorded on the Preliminary Plat dated January 19, 1999, by Mark S. Gronberg for Lots 1 and 2. 7. 8. The plat would require a variance from lot width for Lot 1. The lot has a lot width of 172' where 200' is required for the RR-IB zoning district. Non-Orono wetlands are located on Lot 1. Covenants for Type II and VI wetlands shall be filed on the chain of title. 9.The lot is scheduled to be acquired by MnDot as part of the Highway 12 redevelopment. The site is planned to be developed into a stormwater retention pond for stormwater runoff in the locality. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application for Glenn M. Gronberg and Sandra L. Gronberg for the property located at 325 Willow Drive North per the survey dated January 19, 1999, by Mark S. Gronberg of Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. attached as "Exhibit A", subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. Applicant to dedicate drainage and utility easements 10' along the boundaries of the property and road outlot, and 5' along all internal lot lines. Applicant to develop covenant for Type II and VI wetlands located within Lot 1. The purpose of the covenant is to alert all future property owners of the need to protect the area if alterations are proposed to first obtain the necessary approvals from the Corps of Engineers and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District before applying for approvals from the City of Orono. Page 2 of 5 3. Park dedication fee for Lot 1 shall be paid to the City. 4. Prior to filing the plat with Hennepin County the property owner would be required to complete a title opinion on the lot proposed for subdivision. 5. 6. 7. Stormwater drainage and BMP plans should be reviewed and approved by the MCWD and City Engineer prior to final plat approval. A Letter of Credit written to 150% of the costs shall be issued by the applicant to the City for any drainage and grading plan required on the property, also for the development of the private road for access to North Willow Drive. Outlot A shall be given a new road name, and address assignments for Lots 1 and 2 as well as Lots 1 and 2 in the Spruce Acres subdivision at the time the private road is completed. 8. Developer’s Agreement has been executed. 9. Prior to new construction, future owners shall be responsible for staking and protecting the primary and alternate septic sites. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Planner/Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of each month. 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: A. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated January 19, 1999. B Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. C. Name of plat. Page 3 of 5 2. Legal documents required: A. B. C. D. E. F. Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. The applicant shall provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. Signed and executed Developer's Agreement and Letter of Credit for construction of the private road and drainage improvements. Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over Outlet A. Signed and executed covenants defining responsibility for construction and maintenance of the road in Outlet A, defining future financial obligations of affected property owners. Signed and executed covenants for Type II and VI wetlands within Lot 1. 3. Fees to be paid: Total due: S 200.00* A. Legal review and filing fees = $ 200.00 B. "^Park dedication fee of 8%, not to exceed $4,900, to be paid upon the filing of the final plat and associated documents. Page 4 of 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 25th day of January, 1999. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 2Sth day of January, 1999 by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR GLENN M. GRONBERG OF LOT 3. BLOCK 1, SPRUCE ACRES HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA '■ > »• • • • » •• • 3URLING1 ON NOR RAILROAD COMPANY N 89*42' 20" E 226.92 '-Idi*. S 90*00'-00" g m ■ • \ \/ \ <\0 y I''— f I AS 0€*^Mrsftm \S 90*00'00 ” W EVERING' S 864.51 / WOODHA\^EN LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES Lot 3. Block 1. SPRUCE ACRES ^AtA 1 o Iron marker Bearings shown ore bosed upon on assumed datum wevooN OATC ocscfipnoN (D /!*/>•»# tnZ'iiZ the boiindtiries oi 11... m.ov.- <let;cribed pi opc-fty. <i..d It doM on existing housn. gu/cbo oiul shed thereon. purport to show ony ntiier irt.provemcnls or e.ncroochmenls I ^CneSY COITrY that tms plak WAS PWCFAWCD BY yg QW finra uv nari CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #2450 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 1/20/99 TO: Glenn Gronberg COPIES TO: Mark Gronberg 325 North Willow Drive Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. Long Lake, MN 55356 482 Tamarack Avenue Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Subdivision DATE OF MEETING: 1/19/99 Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted. VOTE:5 FOR 0 AGAINST NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as; City Council January 25, 1999, meeting starts at 7:00 p.m, If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. X:\APPS'WPWIN60\WPDOCS'CAROLE\PCACTlOVa450 A Application # Date Receiyed /a./fe.y ^ Amount Paid 3-50^^ CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site address 3 Z S' Ay. Property Identification Number (PID) 33 •jjjp -23 - »/ " aa/S Please check one - Property y abstract or____torrens? Attach legal description to application. 3^ aiock / APPLICANT Name r^/€ji/iy At. ___________________ Address 33 S aA. 3Afi/€ City ZAAy/^ f ________ _______Phone (home) ZvaSTSSC Phone (work) S^/~ /9ss‘ OWNER (if different than applicant) ( Name Address City__Zip Phone (home) Phone (work) (attach list if more than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size / S. O'? S. 07 Present use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)_____ / Present Zoning District . AR ~ JB PROPOSAL ______ Division for Tax Purposes _________ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new buildling sites) ^ Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites / Existing Units / New Units 3 Total Units •* ;i •• Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use (check) Units per .T.tf7 Acres .• — -1 • V.'*. ^ J J J^7. /2.0 Sq. Ft. Dry Buildable Land V Residential Other (specify) VJ> I ............. .ji lu—f !• 'Jr. i^v.r »' t . ...fitf.wrHvrii wra iDtr^ ■ in i m 01) lot. AfSOj,Ut>5 .•••i’’ V.-.u *; ... i'. vv >-•.. •». i. :• • >• ,i'. ; • y. • , • • ••'• •. - % A SEE MAP 76 IH r** * "Z • iu • Yv**. i';\'V* f. / /<f #. 9 C n I h“ ri- UJC/*> N h \ HUM m\S33 117 P . i I / *:. t *-w UCiB sTcni s£<R oiSTRicr ecuc*Ar SOOOl OlStRICr B017«ART MteilSKO OtSTAlCT 6CtNC*"T tO*€HH OOUltT. UIM<S0U Bu«Mi or ru&ic xAvta ct. AUTKNT or fMPERII TAX a ‘A) Puaic m- 3AU5_____ RESOLUTION NO. 1065 F A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF SPRUCE ACRES . WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision plat by George L. Osgood, the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including; 1. Dedication on the plat of rights of way for public streets and roads, shown as Willow Drive. 2. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements 3. Creation of a new private driveway shown on the plat as Outlot A. 4. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee of $300.00.Hm jraymcxiu Uiuy UJl d ircix.fw s 5. Payment to the City of engineering and legal review fees in the amount of $50.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Spruce Acres, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions; 1. Lot 2, Block 1 shall have temporary access on the existing driveway and/or farm road through Lot 1, Block 1. Before a building permit is issued for Lot 3, Block 1, a new driveway shall be constructed in Outlot A to serve all three lots. Upon completion of the new driveway, all direct access from Willow Drive to Lot 1 shall be eliminated. 2. The aforesaid plat shall be filed with with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before March 11» 1980 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivisic review. Dated this day of September ATT (Talter R.T'Benson, Clerk/Administrator SCALE IN FEET G GORDON R. COFFIN CO. INC. ENGINEERS a LAND SURVEYORS LONG LAKE . MINNESOTA Final Plat of Spruce Acres X • I I •iv •S BURLINGTON -1 I I I I L.« \ I 4 { FORMERLV 11II. Mrrth iiit »/ #/ Stc/fiuf tt, AW SHk AM. FIRST Q A II rj,*» /> r\ Pi"'* W P(LN Y or ST. PAUL PACiriC RAILV/AY COMPANY) •2U4f_______ _______________ ---- /W s 5 r i. %J* 4 • T/k, —. I r 434.SI I 1 I L.■ -m »>i>s: BLOCK e I S r»i R 6M.9I iXS STzAd' o •o I s' SI I I !'i 3 vs 312.00 _ 312.00 iJ 3w9 _____»J«). s OUTLOT e2400_J":'_______A EAST 1321.31 •.CAST LEVERING'S ■AS>/-M /m* «/ /<♦/ ioufA IS ac/ft of /A* Me* of M* SI* of Ucfton SI, ftomihifi Ht Morfft , fonof tS Meif of fft SfA WOODnAVEN M*. I I s! .1 kl s DC O o r% I ■ PRELIMINARY PLAT ( PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR GLENN M. GRONBERG OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1. SPRUCE ACRES HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA BURLINGTON \0 N RAILROAD COMPANY pm LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES ■Lot 3. Block 1. SPRUCE ACRES This survey shows the houndcine-.i ot llu* itiDvi- d^sonhea pioptiMy. cin»j the locolion of on existing hou*;i\ duik. ci(i?et)o and sited thereon. It does not purport to show olh(.*r irf.provemenls or encroochrnents jiAfA S S.OTftAtAU o Iron marker Deorings shown are bosed upon on assumed datum I 1/ J Bonestroo gjj Rosene Anderlik& Ivlf Associates Engineers & Architects December 30,1998 Elizabeth VanZomeren City Planner/Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Glenn Gronberg Subdivision File No. 139-2450 Bonestroo. Rosene. Andertlk ond Associates, tnc. Is on Affirmstive Action/Equoi Opportunity Employer Principots: Otto G Bonestroo. P.E. • Joiepri C. Anderlik. PE. • Marvin L • •'!. PE. • Richard E. Turner. PE. • Glenn R. Cook. PE. • Robert a Schunicht. PE • M Bourdon. PE. • Robert W. Rosene. P.E. and Susan M. Eberiia C.P.A.. Senior Consuitancs Associste Pnncipols: Howard A. Sanford. P-E. • Keith A. Gordon. PE. • ! ■ . Pfefferie. PE. • Richard W. Poster. PE. • David O. Loskota. RE. • Robert C Russek. A.t J H : A. Hanson. PX • Michael T. Raut-rarn. PE. • Ted K Field. PE. • Kenneth P. Anderson. PE !. RoJfs. PE. • Sidney P Williamson. PJL, LS. • Robert F. Koismith • Agnes M. Ring • Michael R Rau. PE • Allan Rick Schmidt RE Offices: Sf. Paul. Rochester. Wiiimar and St. Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl Wedsite: wwwbonestroo.com Dear Liz: We have reviewed the preliminary plat for the proposed two-lot Gronberg subdivision. The site is located west of Willow Drive and north of Woodhaven Drive in the southeast quarter of Section 33. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. 1. Access: Access to the existing home on the property is across a private driveway located on Outlot A between the Gronberg site and Willow Drive. The existing driveway has a gravel surface and serves two other properties north of Outlot A. Access to the proposed Lot 1 would be across the existing driveway. The drawing that was submitted shows the proposed Lot 1 abutting Outlot A at a 25-foot width. To be consistent with City standards we recommend that Outlot A be extended westerly approximately 280 feet at a 50-foot width dong the south side of proposed Lot 2. A cul-de-sac should be constructed at the westerly end of Outlot A to provide room for emergency vehicle turning movements. The private driveway should be reconstructed to a minimum paved width of 24 feet to meet current City standards for a private street serving 3 to 6 units. Plans and specifications for any street improvements should be provided for review. Preliminary plans from MnDOT indicate that this property will be impacted by the proposed T.H. 12 realignment. Plans should be submitted to MnDOT for their review. 2. Grading: A grading and erosion control plan for the entire site should be submitted for review. Erosion control measures should be in place prior to any grading. Additional erosion control will be needed during construction of the house and septic system. 3. Drainage: A drainage area map and drainage calculations for pre and post development conditions should be submitted for review. Phosphorous loadings leaving the site should be limited to a maximum of 0.28 pounds/acre/year. Storm drainage impacts to Uie existing properties south of the site should be reviewed. Ponding does not appear to be practical on this site however, some sort of best management practice (BMP) such as vegetated buffer strips r:.zy be effective in treating runoff leaving the site. Plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their review 4. Easements: Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5 feet wide along all interior lot lines and 10 feet wide along the roadway right-of -ways. Drainage easements should be provided across any drainage ways. 5. Financial Guarantee: When the plans have been completed we can prepare an estimate of the total cost for the street improvements to determine the amount of the financial guarantee required if the City so desires. Please contact me at (604-4863) if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gaopa. City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 612-636-4600 ■ Fax: 612-636-1311 Gray Freshwater Center Hwya. 15 & 19. Navarre MaB: 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior. MN 55331-9578 Phone: (612) 471-0590 Fax (612) 471-0682 Emaih admin8minnehahacreek.org Web Site: www.minnehahacfeek.org Board of Managers Pamela G.Blixt James Calkirs Lance Fisher Monica Gross Thomas W.LaBounty Thomas Maple. Jr. Malcolm RekJ 0: Minnehaha Creek r-'VVatersheil District J Improving Quality ofWater, Quality of life December 30,1998 Elizabeth Van Zommeren City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323*0066 V \ - , • REt Review of Proposed Projects Dear Ms. Van Zommeren: We have reviewed the site plans for proposed projects in Orono which will be on public hearings in January. Our review shows that several of these projects will need permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The following comments apply: 1. #2410: No MCWD stormwater permit is required. There appears to be no wetland BcjyWR or floodplain impacts. If the project involves grading of more than 5,000 square feet an erosion control permit will be required. 2. #2449: A stormwater permit will be required to address the issues of rate control and VO^T/ BMP’s. Buffer zones will be required around all wetlands. The width of those UilSS. buffers will depend on the surface area of the wetland. If any filling, draining or ----- excavating is planned within the wetland boundary a permit will be required for that activity. 3. #2447: Filling or grading below elevation 931.5 will require a floodplain alteration V/OOOHC permit. A cut and fill summary would be needed to determine whether or not a net * * decrease of the flood storage zone will result from the plarmed activity. 4. #2450: This project will be required to provide BMP’s for stormwater management. ^ If grading of more than 5,000 square feet is involved an erosion control permit will also be required. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please call me at 471-6282 if you have further questions. Sincerely, ^m Hafner District Technician C:\FILES\commeni$\Orono_!23 098.doc i r K TO: FROM: DATE: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager December 31,1998 SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2550, Glen Gronberg - Preliminary Plat The proposed two lot subdivision includes septic system testing and design for two drainHelds on each lot. All of the drainfield sites meet City and State Regulations. The Plat includes an existing residence which has a septic system that has been confirmed by the City as being in compliance will current State Rules. One future drainfield on this lot was tested by Swcdlund Septic Service. The new lot has also been tested by Swedlund to confirm the presence of two drainfield sites. These drainfield sites are located on little or no slope and meet all City and State Regulations. Based on the above information, staff would recommend approval of the application. The City requires that all draifield sites be fenced off prior to any grading or land alteration on the property. 'k«.. > A rug Environmental . Inc . 3S S!L P.O. Box 1842. Minnetonka. Minnesota 55345-J842 Phone No: 612/974-9856 To: Mr. Glenn Gronberg From: Patricia Arlig /II Date;December 30. 1993 D Re:WETLAND DELLVE a TION Orono , Minnesota within (NE'/«) of the SE K of SE<TUSK. R21W ArUg Environmental was retained to complete a v/e:!ar.a dinnei: on_0:t - refcfenced above. The property is located t>n the v«st side or the Burlington Northern Rail Railroad tracks, A cu!-ae-sac «« •y-y house on the property. The owner plans to .p: r.cnrt single family residences on adjace.ii ana nearoy parceaS. ..n-ie a....... — v end of the property. ^ According to the Minnesota Wetland Con5en.«;cr: dS^ delineated using the guidelines of the FED c RAI 'a-:-'-, Tne WETT.AND.S (1989) and theCCR?SOf ENOIN c ERS WE.-A.N o available maps were reviewed prior to t.-.e nt:c ceiineat.or.. .... .. designates the soil in the site vicinity as iane- Iccm U Oi/.w.’- .v-'-,., ; -y y'.y., loam, and Shorewood silly clay loam which ate not listed as^ydcx s..r.= ■ publication «v..eie SniU of the United Stareync wcS ham and Hamel loam which are lisieo as hya... s..t.s ....... Jpmi^EIHCd) for this property Copies of the SCS and N-Wi .maos or rnr. s.te •..-e..- attached to this report My assistant and I visited the site Thursday. December 17 199h t™.u site The weather was cold and cloudy. Typically, water ieveis a.e aaagnes.^. nt. season and recede in the late summer There was a lig.t: snow ^^ye: un ...c -• precipitation in the project vicinity was shg.otiy a-cve v..t‘ er levels would be belov; mid-gro'wing season concitior.s at the * ai- - • • ____wriz •iwi'i i.:sc 9f^0%2wi(_Cronb€rg Orono ELw^ • Soil pits were made earlier that day for percolation tests. Several of the test holes v/ere open and could be observed for soil color and texture. Soil colors were determined by matching them to a Munsell Soil Color Chart. The soils were examined for hydric characteristics suc.i as: low chroma, organics, mottling, gleying, and moisture. Soil samples were observed at points inside the basins >vith some wetland characteristics, at the basin/wetland edge, and into the zones. The soil pits were marked wiih orange stake flags labeled “A” ’xdthin the wetlarid, “3” at the wetland edge, and “C” at the upland pit. Conditions at the soil pits near the delineated wetland edges are described on attached Data Forms. The wetland edge is usually determined to be near the point where evidence of subsurface water is tvithin 12" of the ground elevation, wnere at least .^0% of the vegetation is hydrophytic, and where hydric soil is encountered. In the areas delineated as wetlands at this site, the identifiable vegetation was more than 50% hydrophytic and hydric sods plus evidence of wetland hydrology were found. Wetland 1 is mostly a Type 6 wetland with reed canary grass (Type 2) areas at die fringe. The weUand is designated on the N\VI map as PFOlCd/PEMCd. The wetland has a variety of vegetation includang dominants of willows, red-ozier, and reed canary* grass. There are ferns, • willow <‘hrubs and aspen near the wedand edge. There is some upland golden red (Solidago canadensis) just upgrade of the wetland edged. The soil characteristics were ty pical of Hamel loam. There was no standing water in the wetland and no water in the pits, i placed wire stakes with numbered pink flags at the edge of this wetland basin. I also placed wire slakes with orange flags at die soil pits noted on Lie artacata Data rams. The flags are labeled “A” in the wetland, ‘"B” at the wetland edge, and a: an upl^d pit. Data Forms - Routine Onsite Determination Method were compieted for conditions at the wetland and are attached to this report. Othi*r small patches of reed canary grass with aspen or willows were noted. However, those areas also included upland vegetation such as fescue, smooth brome ana oa.<s £ found only the one wetland basin described above on this prcceny. The Minnesota rules require that designers attempt to avoid wetland impacts. If your plans include fill or grading in the wetland basins, you will need a Wetland Alteration Permit fi’om the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). The delineated wetland edge must be shown on your grading plan. Please contact me at 612-974-9856 vriih any questions regarding wetland issues for this site. it^Gronbtrg Orono SCS map Orono, Hennepin County Gronberg property » rr.u Duiuhis silt loam Glencoe sU:y clay loam Lcs’ii.' h.rv. a.-r. V from NWI map Orono, Hennepin County Gronberg property EXCELSIOR quadrangle fOl6, DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD Soil Pit 1 - A Field Investigator(s): Arlig Date: December 17,1993 Countv: HENNEPIN Plant Community: T>-?e 6 Site Information: Glenn Gronberg,Plant Comnamity- a: this Point: T)pe 2 WiUow Drive. ORONO, MN MNDNR no NWl PFOlCd/PEMi^J •«.______91____M A 1Environmental conoiuons ai me piani cominuniiv. nas me vcgcuiuuu, -------o---------.------ Yes 2— No _ Railroad propert}’ (erabankinent for tracks) j’ost north of the w etland. Yard surrounding the ^^^:lar.d is mowed grass right to edge of basin. May have been channeled in past, but net impaaed lateiy. Diverse vegetaticn in main body of «uand Tes, plu near edge in ....................................■w DOMINANT VEGETA.TION Percent of dominant species that are OBL. FACW, and'or FAC _ Is the hydroph>tic vegetation criterion met? Yes X__ No Rationale: More than 50% hydrophytes SOILS Subgroup:' T\-pic argiaouolls Undetermined______ Series/phase: Hamel loam on SCS man_____ Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes _x_ No___ Is the soil a Histosol? Yes _ No_x_ Histic epipeden present? Yes — Is the soil. Mottled? Yes__ No _x_ Colors:_________ G!e>ed? Yes No X No X Matrix Color; 2/1 on lOYR.____ Other soil characteristics: muck>-. plant fioers Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes x No Rationale: On list/ low chroma with organic odor/supports wetland vegetation ^ ^ HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Yes__ No x Surface water depth: —pot fpt^nd Is the soil saturated? Yes very wet No15 me sou suiuiuicu: X ___ Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole; none in d ’> o<^pv/t^amp List other field eudence of surface inundation or soil saturation: definite depression Is the wetland hydrolog) criterion met? Yes JL No---- . u • kc \ Rationale ASSUMED- Evidence that water has been at surface (maned grasses, curved trunks on snruos)_ ________ . ^ — ■■ A » # A % 9 A %. T r ^ n A V T A TJURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND R.\TIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Yes _x_No Rationale for jurisdictional decision: on NWl map and All parameters met 9^QH2w€tjGronb£rg Orono DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD Soil Pit 1- Field Invesiigator(s): Arlig County: HENNEPIN Site Information; Glenn Gronberg, Willow Drive, ORONO, MN Date: December 17,1998 Plant Community: Type 6 Plant Community at this Point; T\pe 2 MNDNR no NWT PFOlCd/FEMCd En\ironmental conditions at the plant community: Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been signincaauy disturbed: | No XYes _ ___ Comments: SEE notes on Soil Pit 1- A. ISiiiil DOMINANT VEGETATION J Common Name Species Name % Cover ; Indicator Siarus J Stranur. 2. Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratensis j FAC- 1 grass/herb 3. Black willow Salix nigra 1 FACW shrub 4. Fescue, meadow Festuca pratensis 1 FACU-grass/heib 5. 6.' ___________^_________ 1 1 7.1 1 8.1 1 1 9.1 Is the bydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes iC SOILS Subgroup;* T.tic areisouoils Undetermined_______________ Series/phase; Hamel loam on SCS mao_____ Is the soil on the hydiic soils list? Yes _2L_ No___ Is the soil a Histosol? Yes _ No__ Hisiic epipedon present? Yes— Nojl_ Is the soil: Mottled? Yes__ No x Colors;_________ G!c>ed?Yes_?_ No NIatrix Color; too is 2/1 on lOYR. then ^ 3” 3/1 on lOYR____ Other soil characteristics; some roots Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes x No__ ’Raxionalc. On list 'low chroma'supports yvelland vegeiation ---- Is the ground surface inundated? Yes__ No x Is the soil saturated? Yes__ No x but damp HYDROLOGY Surface water depth: Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: not found- but very damp. List other field e\idence of surface inundation or soil saturation: at grade change Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes _x _ No__ Rationale: ASSUMED: vegetation ami soils found, other evidence noted, appears to be at ed^e of chsractensr.cs^ nJRISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATION.-ME Is the plant community a wetland? Yes V No__ Rationale for jurisdictional decision; PARAMETERS m.et 9%0Vl\^€(jGronb€Tg Orono DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD SoUPit 1- C Field In\estigator(s); Arlig County: HENNEPIN Site Iiiformaiion; Glenn Gronberg. WUlow Drive. ORONO. MN Date: December P, 1998 Plant Community: UPLANTD Plant Community at this Point: upland MNDNR no NWI no Environmental conditions at the plant communitj" Yes No X Comments: SEE notes for Soii pit 1- A Has the vegetation, soils, and/'er hydrologj’ been sigiuficanUy disnubed; | 1 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC Is the hydroph>tic vegetation criterion met? Yes No jc Rationale Less than 50% hydrophytes SOILS Series/phase: Minnetonka/Shorewood silt\ clav loams _ Subgroup. __Nlv,l.ic iit.olud>.u. Is the soil on the hvdnc soils list? Yes__ No .x Undeter;n:ncd----------------------- Is the soil a Histoso!‘> Yes__ No jc__ Histic epipedon present ? Yes —. No Ji^ Is the soil; Mottled'’ Yes No Colors;--------------- G!e>ed? es — No _x_ Matrix Color; 2/2 lOYR; Other soil characteristics; silw loam, sticky Tc hvririr coil criterion Yes No X Is the ground surface inundated? Yes__ No X_ Surface water depth. Is the soil saturated’’ Yes No X__ Depth to free-standing water m piL'soil probe hole; not found List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation above change in grade Is the wetland hydrology criterion met"’ Yes No ^ Rationale Water not found within foot of surface/ above grade change JURISDICTIONAL DETERNUNATION AND R.ATIONALE Is the plant community a w etland"’ Yes__ No _X_ Rationale for jurisdictional decision; P.AJLAMETERS not it^Cronberg Orono I • • • • t \ N ORDINANCE NO. SECOND SERIES the city council of ORONO ordains as FOLLOWS; _ .__irt /VI Vf«in?<*ir the CITX V-UUINV-U- -------------- SECTION 1. by add^^ folding darmitions;CodeSecdoall.03.Subdivisioa2aKeacabet y _______rnad bv anothcr loc and -------------------- ■L«-B.er - A iw S.'A*..p.™*. an "easement back lot .n caacLutu>. w—— — - u, . A » P-” " ““' “ platted for access to a back lot.lor acccoo ww I* — — .T • r-ArfA Ssctioa 10 03 is ameaded by adding SECTION 2. Municipal Zoning Code Secuon lu.u Subdivision 27 which shall read as foUows: Suhd. 27. Special Standards for Back Lots that received as defined in this section which were j^yect to the following S’?!?— 5 of the Orono Subdivision Code: A. Dimensional standards for back lots shall be as foUows: 1. Lot area sbaU be 150 5 of the zoning district requirement. • • «tback line of a nonlakesh^ ^t^t^ylid^fron"yard for anyS“.rSJ isr,» s'S: corridor ends and the lot ^ ^ lakeshorc setback the lot width standard at the shore^e, at tnc line, and at the street yard setback Une. J i B. C. 3 nie depth of the required street yard or front yard shaU be 150% • of the zoning district front yard requirement. 4.The required side yard and rear yard depths for bacUots shall^ 150% of the zoning district yard requirements. The requi^ lieshore yard of a lakeshoce back lot shall meet the zonmg district lakeshore yard requirements. Dimensional scandaids for front lots. A ftonc lot created as p« of a Lntftiaclc lot division shaU meet all zonmg dtstnet ^ standards, except that the requited side yari of the front lot l^afent T^ccess outlot shall be equivalent to the side street yard requirement for that zoning district. Access requirements. 1.rs rssris? “.Si; without encroaching on neighboring properties. access to the existing street will be a potenaal safety hazard. J. Driveways within a back lot shall be located at least 10 from the side or rear lot lines of adjacent lots. 4.No more than two residences may be served by a driveway located within an access outlot. 5.No access outlot may be platted abutting an adjacent Except when the intent is to combine the two access outlots for creation of a pubUc or private road meetmg City standards. D. Screening requirements. yard of adjacent lots. r'-r mr > f t nViifiiBi m , ■ -n,. vaid of th« bKk lot shall be adequately scteeued by ■ T^r^rrir-n""" at the discretion of the City, so as to inmiston of vehicle headlights into the side or rear yards of adjacent lots, requirements: A^eessorv structures within a back iot shall be allowed no closer ^ lO’^o a neighboring property’s side or tear ya. . <5 shall not be allowed within the required saett ,,.1 i« which abuts the street yard of a back lot. 3. No accessory structure shall be allowed within an access ouUot. cEcnON 3. Orono Municipal Code Section 11.31. Subdivision 5 is hereby deleted and the" following language substituted in its place: 1. 2 ( Subdivision 5; Double frontage lots, access to lots, and frontAjack lot di A. B Double frontage lots. Double residential of topography and orientation. Access from any anerial ^^erTdri^way access from access exclusively from an anenal r • ' adjoining lots, the SU™may"thTsuch “rbe sslb^^ CO back into traffic on any anerial roadway. Front/back lot subdivisions. _"Hag |^“w^gacn'SaU not be created, defined in this Chapter (sec detimuon or ^t Ba the FrontAjack lot divisions shaU be j jq the pubUc or creation of an outlot to provide access &jjm creditable lot area for private road. Such oudot shall not^ t?^w^bdivisions shall adhere to either the back or front lots. FrontA)ack lot subdivisions snau the following standards: ( 1. Applicability. a. • FrontA)aclc lot divisions may be used when existing property dimensions are narrow and deep, such that lot ^d* docs not allow for a side-by-side lot spUt, but acreage iS adequate to provide a "front lot" and a back lot without requirii^ an area variance when the area of the outlot access corridor is excluded. b.Froo'‘/ba:k lot divisions may be used for individual lot soUcs" but may not be used when subdividing a large D^cerinto numerous lots if creation of a back lot is merely a convenience to the developer rather than supported by unique site factors. c.A froocftack lot division shall not be aUowed when any line than a distance equivalent • to the zorung district required front yard depth. Dimensional standaids for back lots shall be as follows: Lot area shall be 150S5 of the zoning district requirement.a. b. m Lot width measured paraUel to the front or sneet lot line at the street yard setback line of a lakeshore back ^ the rear of the front yard setback Ime of a nonl^eshore back lot, shall meet the zoning district wid* , The street yard or front yard for any back lot wUl b vard staning where the narrow access 'and the lot begins. Lakeshore back width standard at the shoreline, at the lakeshor line and at the street yard setback line. c.The deoth of the required street yard or front yard shall be 150% of the zoning district front yard requirement. d.The rcouired side yard and rear yard depths for .^^k lots shaU be 150% of the zoning district yard reoushaU be 150% of the zoning oiiui'-*. ^ The required lakeshore yard of a lakeshore meet the zoning district lakeshore yard requirem I 3. 6. Xe to “1ot adjaceot lo the access outlet shall be e.^tval.at to the *de street yard requirement for that zonmg district. 4. Access requirements: a. screening without encroaching on neighbormg properties. b.Tn aoorovin<' front/back lot divisions, the City may require ?a?bom from lot and back lot share a driveway access widun the access oudot if Council an additional access to the existmg street wiU be a peu-t. safety hazard. c.Driveways within a back lot shall be locamd at least 10’ from the side or tear lot Imes of adjacent lots. d.No more than two residences may be served by a driveway located within an access outlet. e.No acc-ss outlot may be platted abutting an adjacent outlot «ceot wten^ inteut is to combine the two access oud<^ of a pubUc or private road meetmg City Standards. • anH acc»ssorv structure standards.5. Screening requirements Frontrtiack lot subdivisions shaU be designed m ^ the screening requirements and accessory structure star Section 10.03, Subdivision 27 can be met. •me requirement md Pl*' those front/back lot divisions which receiv y approval after January 1, 1994. SECTION 4. Adoption and publication. TTiis upon pubUcaiion. Pioneer and the Uker newspapers and shaU become erfecuve immediately up . kui r, of Orono Minnesota, on this 13 _ day of Adopted by- the City Councd of 0.^ December . 1993. by a vo« of • ATTEST: 6otoW M- Clerk published ic the Laker/Pioneer newspapers the week of 12/27/93. lUN DATE 12/l9/9«HENNEPIN COUNTT PROPERTY INFORNATXON SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PXASMtl PACE 15 lATCH 592 PROP AOOR OWNER NANS TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SO SS-110-23 IS •915 92995 WAVZATA ILVD H WASHDiOTON SCIENTIFIC IND WASHINOTON SCIENTIFIC INO P 0 aOX S99 LONO LAKE NN 55SS9 SS SS-11S-2S SI 9919 999SO ADDRESS UNASSXGNED ON RY CO ON RY CO SO SS-110-2S 91 9999 92999 WOODHAVEN OR HILTON H DXX NILTON H BIX 2999 WOODHAVEN DR LONO LAKE NN 55S59 o PROP AOOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR SB SS-11B-2S 91 9995 92959 WOODHAVEN DR K A EDWARDS SDK WALTER KIN EDWARDS A BONNIE HALTER 2959 WOODHAVEN LONO LAKE NN 55S59 SB SS-11S-2S 91 9999 92599 WOODHAVEN DR T N HYDE ALA HYDE TODD A LXESL HYDE 2599 WOODHAVEN DR LONG LAKE NN 55S59 SB SS'il8-2S 91 9997 92559 WOODNAVEN OR 0 E A L K HUTCHINS OEOROE E A LINDA K HUTCHINS 2559 WOODHAVEN OR LONO LAKE NN 55S59 PROP AOOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SB SS-11B-2S 91 9912 99SA5 WILLOW OR N OEOROE L OSOOOD ETAL OEOROE L OSOOOD SAS WILLOW OR N LONO LAKE NN BSSS9 SB SS-11B-2S 91 9915 99S95 WILLOW DR N OEOROE L OSGOOD ET AL LARRY 0 OSGOOD SAS WILLOW DR N LONO LAKE NN 5SSSA SB SS>11B-2S 91 9919 99S25 WILLOW OR N GLENN A SANDRA GRONBERO GLENN N GRONBERO S2S WILLOW OR N LONO LAKE NN 55S5A PROP Aum OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SB SS-11B-2S 91 9915 999SB ADDRESS UNASSXGNED 0 H A S L GRONBERO GLENN H A SANDRA L GRONBERO S2S N WILLOW OR LONO LAKE NN S5S5A SB SS-lia*2S 92 999B 92AB9 SILVER VIEW OR SPEAK THE WORD CHURCH SPEAK THE WORD CHURCH 515 JERSEY AVE S OOLDEN VALLEY NN 5592A SB SS-11B-2S 92 9999 92A59 SILVER VIEW OR J V A D N CROTTEAU JOHN V A DONNA H CROTTEAU 2959 SILVERVIEW DRIVE ORONO NN 55S59 i " '3 . «: PROP AOOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR SB SS-11B-2S 92 991S 999SB ADDRESS UNASSIONED RICHARD A PATRICIA NEYER NICHAEL HXLBELINK B5 OOLDEN VIEW DR LONO LAKE NN S5S59 72 SS-118*2S 19 9905 99991 WILLOW DR CHURCH OF ST OEOROE CHURCH OF ST OEOROE 991 WILLOW OR L«40 LAKE NN 55S56 TOTAL BATCH 592 99919 • ' n *1 ♦ bTKLIiT PERMIT RECORD 3 Application Date: 12/16/98 Completion Date: 12/31/98 Deadline Date: 4/30/99 TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator January 11,1999 SUBJECT: #2450 Glenn Gronberg 325 North Willow Drive Preliminary Subdivision-Public Hearing Zoning Dbtrict: Lot Area: RR-IB 5.07 acres One Family Rural Residential District (2 Acre) Application: The applicant has applied for a Preliminary Plat for a two-lot subdivision of a 5.07 acre site located off North Willow Drive. The lot does contain one house, ov/ned by the applicant that would remain on Lot 2. Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.28 RR-JB One Family Rural Residential Zoning District Subd, 5 Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements. B. Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 2 Acres 200'50'30’50’ 1^2450 Glenn Gronberg 323 Sorth Willow Drive Preliminary* Subdivision 1/19.99 Page I Section 11.03, Definition 66 b. "Class II Subdivision" A Class II Subdivision shall be a plat and may qualify for a limited review procedure established in this Chapter if it meets all of the following criteria: 1.The Subdivision results in no more than two buildable lots, one or both of which are less than five acres (217,800 square feet) of land or one or both of which have less than 300 feet of frontage on public roadway which has been accepted and opened by the City or on a private roadway open to travel or vehicular use pursuant to an easement between persons or between persons and the City. 2. The subdivision does involve the vacation or dedication of public roadways or extension of municipal utilities. 3. The subdivision does not involve any flexible zoning application. 4. The subdivision may include the creation of outlots and easements for access, open space, flowage, conservation, in addition to the two buildable lots. Section 11.03, Subdivision 2 Creation of lots which do not abut a public or private road Ordinance 122. This Subdivision Ordinance defines back lots as a lot typically separated from a public or private road by another lot and which gains access to the public or private road via a narrow corridor. Such a separated lot is considered to be a "back lot" when the corridor is platted as an outlot. A separated lot is considered to be a "flag lot" when the corridor is platted as part of the lot. When the corridor is merely an easement over another lot, the separated lot is considered to be an "easement back lot". Front lots are defined as a lot abutting a public or private road, across which an outlot has been platted for access to a back lot. Lot Configurations Loti Lot 2 2.02 Acres Dry 0.00 Orono Wetlands 3.05 Acres Dry 0.00 Orono Wetlands H2450 Glenn Gronberg 325 North Willow Drive Preliminary Subdivision 1/19/99 Page! 'f Access The existing 5.07 acre lot is served by a private driveway that serves two other lots. When the Spruce Acres Sut division was approved in 1979 an outlot was created for the purposes of serving as a driveway for the three lots. The driveway was not built until the applicant's house was constructed in 1988. Prior to the construction of the house, access for Lot 1, Spruce Acres was by a private driveway with access directly to North Willow Drive. Lot 2 had a temporary easement across Lot 1 for the purposes of access. Resolution #1065 (September 11, 1979) approved the Spruce Acres Subdivision. A condition of the resolution was the private drive in Outlot A was not required to be developed until a building permit was issued for Lot 3. A copy of the Spruce Acres Plat is attached as "Exhibit G". The proposed plat shows the new Lot 1 gaining access to a private drive that was approved to serve only 3 lots. The Gronberg Subdivision would create a fourth lot being served by the private driveway. In December, 1993 the City Council amended the Subdivision Code to state "no more than two residences may be served by a driveway located within an access outlot". Flag lots and easement back lots as defined in the Subdivision Code can not be created. Orono Municipal Code Section 11.31, Subdivision 5 states "Front/back lot divisions shall be allowed only in conjunction with the creation of an outlot to provide access from the back lot to the public or private road. Such outlot shall not be allowed as creditable lot area for either the back or front lots". Under the existing Code this lot arrangement would not be allowed because it does create a "flag lot" (Lot 1). If an access outlot is created to serve the back lot, the required lot area would be decreased by approximately 12,500 s.f (.28 acres = 50’ by 250 ’ access outlot). The Code also would not allow the new access outlot to be created. Subdivision 27 (C)(5) states "no access outlot may be platted abutting an adjacent access outlot except when the intent is to combine the two access outlots for creation of a public or private r> ad meeting City standards". Private streets serving 3 to 6 units require a platted right-of-way width of 50’, and a minimum pavement width of 24 ’. A cul-de-sac should be constructed at the end of the new street to provide room for emergency vehicle turnaround. Providing a cul-de-sac at the western edge of Lot 2, and opening the entire private street would eliminate the requirement of 3 acres for the back lot. The lot would no longer be defined as a back lot, due to having direct access to a street. Lot 1 would only be required to be 2 acres. The existing property owners of Lots 1 and 2, located at 345 and 365 North Willow Drive would have to enter into an agreement to develop the private street as they are joint owners of the access outlot. H2450 Glenn Gronberg 32S Sonh WiUQ^^ Drive Preliminary Subdivision 1/19/99 Page 3 Septic The On-Site Systems Manager has reviewed the septic sites and has determined both the primary and alternate drainfield sites meet all City and State standards. The site evaluation was completed by Swedlund Septic Service. The existing sites located on Lot 2 are conforming systems and would not be impacted by ihe subdivision. Drainage City Engineer Tom Kellogg has reviewed the proposed plat. Engineer comments are included as "Exhibit I". The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has commented the site would be required to provide BMPs for storm water management. Park Dedication The Park Commission reviewed this application at their January 4,1999 meeting. Park dedication fee would only collected for one additional lot. Lot Area and Size Back lots are required to meet 150% of the requ’r jd lot area. The proposed Lot 1 would be required to be 3.0 acres. The depth of the required street yard or front yard shall be 150% of the zoning district standard. The front lot created as part of a front/back lot division shall meet all zoning district area, width and setback standards, except that the required side yard of the front lot adjacent to the access outlot shall be equivalent to the side street yard requirement for the zoning district. Lot Requirements RR-IB Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Front Lot - 2 2 Acres 200*50'30'50' Back Lot -1 3 Acres 200'75'45'75' Proposed Lot 2 contains an existing shed that is located 15' from what would become the rear lot line. The shed would be required to be removed as a condition of approval for a final plat. 1^2-^50 Glenn Gronberg 325 S^orth Willow Drive preliminary SuhJmston 1/19/99 Page A t Easements The applicant would be required to dedicate drainage and utiliiy easements 10’ along the boundaries of the property and road outlot, and 5' along all internal property lines. A wetland appears on proposed lot 1. The applicant shall covenant for Type II and VI wetlands within Lot 1. Proposed Highway 12 Development MnDot will be rerouting Highway 12 along the rail corridor located adjacent to the North side of the property. The plans include MnDot purchasing the entire property proposed for subdivision. The plan for the site, once acquired by the State, would be to develop it as a ponding area. The state would be purchasing all three lots located in the Spruce Acres Subdivision. A map illustrating the proposed ponding plan is included with this Report as "Exhibit M". Staff Recommendation Table the Preliminary Plat to provide applicant with an opportunity to redesign the subdivision to meet zoning standards, and to address concerns for access to the property. Other items that will need to be addressed prior to Final Plat approval: 1. 2. Applicant to dedicate drainage and utility easements 10’ along the boundaries of the property and road outlot, and 5’ along all internal lot lines. Applicant to develop covenant for Type II and VI wetlands located within Lot 1. The purpose of the covenant is to alert all future property owners of the need to protect the area if alterations are proposed to first obtain the necessary approvals from the Corps of Engineers and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District before applying for approvals from the City of Orono. 3. 4. 5. 6. Park dedication fee for Lot 1 would be collected by the City. Complete a road maintenance agreement with neighboring property owners, and develop the new street as a private drive with a cul-de-sac. Grant road and utility easements over the road outlot. Maintenance covenants shall be provided for road and drainage improvements. H2450 GUnnGronberg 325 North Willow Drive preliminary Subdivision 1/19/99 Page 5 r 7.Staff recommends the existing shed shall be removed from Lot 1 or relocated to meet setback standards for the zoning district. 8. Prior to filing the plat with Hennepin County the property owner would be required to complete a title opinion on the lot proposed for subdivision. Attachments A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Application Location Map Site Topography Plat Map Section Map Resolution Number 1065 - Approving Plat of Spruce Acres (9/11/79) Plat of Spruce Acres Preliminary Plat (12/11/98) City Engineer Comments (12/30/98) Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (12/30/98) Septic Evaluation (12/31/98) Wetland Delineation Report (12/30/98) MnDot Highway 12 Plan Ordinance 122, Front Lot/Back Lot Standards Property Owners List Permit Record ^2450 Glenn Gronberg 325 Sorth IVillow Drive Preliminary Subdivision 1/19/99 Page 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT ' « PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR ' GLENN M. GRONBERG OF LOT 3. BLOCK 1. SPRUCE ACRES HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA •• • ........... RLINGTON \JORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY N 89*42’ 20 ” Z 228.92 *? N, • S 90*00 ’ 00* F 434,58.________^ \ r \ 3 \n. f j Ai VL, 1 / ; S.OSiAi. ; \ \ \ \ e K-tjr. 4 » ytTf c fMfMdAr ffdnt *04*^d r* o o tf mr c Jtdi*. \\ X. / / / r -o j:....OUTLOl A •n:, 90*00 ’00* W LEVERING ’ S 884,51 t / WOODHAV.EI'N legal description of PREMISES: Lot 3, Block 1. SPRUCE ACRES This survey shows Ihe bouudoties ol the ohovc described P'»P«'>T ’ “"<> rr^rliS? ‘r ehc,oochmeo.s. .•M* m •* *** ** * ^ - /^/I . ^ ; Beorinqs shSwn °o?e*'bosed upon on ossumed dolum • • •• • 0 • A 4 ' • Jt h3.- > Tar-**. \ ( « »4^UI ! -I«.• .. * • L 1I Application Date: 9/22/99 Completion Date: 9/22/99 60 Day DeadUne: 11/21/99 Review date extension: 1/20/00 City Council Action to deny: 1/10/00 CO( IWCIL meeting JAN 2 4 2000 cu y (jHum REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 1/24/00 ITEM NO • 4 > • Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator/Planner Adminbtrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2539 John and Becki Sundet 684 Tonkawa Road Variance Zoning District; LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Exhibits: A B Resolution Staff Report (Dated January 6,2000) Application Summary: The City Council denied zoning application #2539 for variances to permit an addition to the existing residence on January 10, 2000. The application was denied by a vote of 4 to 1. Council directed Staff to return with a resolution to be presented for adoption by the City Council. Staff is recommending the Council adopt the resolution attached as Exhibit A. Council Action Requested To adopt the resolution denying variances for hardcover and average lakeshore setback tor property located at 684 Tonkawa Road. A A RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCES PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (B) AND 2; SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (2) AND (C) (6). FILE #2539 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq., the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the protection of the public health, safety and general w-elfare; and WHEREAS, John Sundet and Rebecca Sundet (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 684 Tonkawa Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: The Southeasterly Half of Lot 5, and the Northwesterly Half of Lot 6, Except the Northwesterly 15.00 feet of the Southeasterly Half of Lot 5, Parten’s Point First Division, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property "); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for variances for hardcover and average lakeshore setback to permit additions to an existing residence, requesting the following approvals; 1. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2); Lakeshore Hardcover Requirements: Within 75' to 250' of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. To permit a hardcover variance to allow 5,841 square feet (39.26%), where 5,201 square feet (34.96%) exists, and 3,719.5 square feet (25%) is allowed. Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots, except this does not apply to stairways, lifts, landings, and lockboxes. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent Page 1 of 5 lakeshore lots. To permit sl variance to encroach 34 feet into the average lakeshore setback. WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the recommendations of the City staff and the Planning Commission; and the comments and written statements submitted by the applicant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby denies the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: 1. The property consists of .68 acre, or 29,500 square feet in land area in the LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential District. 2. The property is an existing residential property consisting of a 1,007 square foot single story house and a detached garage located near the street lot line consisting of 667 square feet. 3. The proposed addition to the residence would include an attached garage and living space. The total footprint for the proposed addition would increase the size of the residential structure to 2,666 square feet, which is an increase in 1,659 square feet. 4. It is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to protect the water quality of Lake Minnetonka by limiting the amount of hardcover a lot contains. No hardship exists on this lot that would require granting of variances for the amount of hardcover proposed. 5. The development is inconsistent with General Land Use Policies and Goals. The Orono Community Management Plan (CMP 4-15) General Land Use Policy No. 13 states “Future development must enhance the environment. Land Development should respect and enhance the unique natural features of the site and the general environmental assets of the community. Preservation of natural views, vegetation, drainage and general respect for unique site features always produce more aesthetic results and lasting value for the property owner and the community than does wholesale alteration of the landscape or mathematical division to the highest possible density.” Page 2 of 5 6. 7. 8. The granting of the requested after-the-fact variances would be contrary to the provisions of Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) with which the applicants must first comply in order that variances be granted. The Council finds that: A.The property in question can be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls if the proposed variances are denied. B.The plight of the landowner is self-created by the increased hardcover proposed for the new development of the property. C.Granting of the proposed variances would appear to serve as a convenience to the applicants to provide additional living space and an attached garage when a garage exists on the property, and the applicants have not demonstrated a reasonable hardship or practical difficulty acceptable to the Citv Council. The Orono Community Management Plan has addressed the issue of protecting the water quality of Lake Minnetonka. One way of protecting the lake is to limit the amount of hardcover on lots within the Shoreland Overlay District. The Shoreland Overlay District is all property located within 1,000 feet of the 929.4 elevation, Ordinary High Water Level of Lake Minnetonka (OHWL) and other protected lakes and tributaries. Additional hardcover near the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka would prevent the direct absorption of rainfall into the ground. The Orono Municipal Code requires all structures to meet a 75 foot setback to the OHWL and meet the average lakeshore setback of adjacent residential structures. The proposed plan would include a 34 fool encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. The proposed house would be roughly 18 feet higher than the existing roof line. The existing roof, when measured from the street side of the residence is approximately 13 feet in height. The height and mass of the structure would impact the view from adjacent properties. The purpose of the ordinance is to ensure a consistent development, relating to setbacks from the lakeshore, and to protect lakeshore views from adjacent properties. Page 3 of 5 9. 10. 11. The grading and increased structural hardcover contribute to the proposed development including a new storm sewer system and drainfield to accommodate the drainage on the site. The size and configuration of the proposed footprint of the house has required a stormwater management plan for the property. The Orono Community Management Plan (CMP 3-13) recognizes storm sewers speed runoff and provide no natural filtration or nutrient assimilation. The Plan suggests storm sewers will only be utilized in local flood prone areas or where there is soil erosion insolvable by natural means. An attached garage requires extensive regrading on the property to extend the existing driveway. The regrading and additional structural coverage for the house have raised concerns about drainage on the property. Applicants have developed a proposed stormwater and drainage plan for the property to handle a one year storm event. Proposed is a storm sewer to be constructed to route stormwater around the residence into a proposed drainfield area. The City Engineer reviewed the drainage plan and had concerns about the drainfield's capacity and long term maintenance. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 4 of 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 24th day of January, 2000, ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of January, 2000, by Gabriel Jabbour & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 Application Date: 9/22/99 Completion Date: 9/22/99 60 Day Deadline: 11/21/99 Review date extension: 1/20/00 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 1/06/00 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2539 John and Becki Sundet 684 Tonkawa Road Variance Zoning District: LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area:29,500 s.f. (.68 acres) Exhibits: A Revised Site Plan (Received December 29, 1999) B Minutes of Planning Commission (October 18, 1999) C Planning Report (October 12, 1999) D Floor Plan E Elevations F City Engineer ’s letter (January 5,2(X)0) Application: The applicants have proposed to construct a new attached garage and a main floor master bedroom suite to the residence. A detached garage is currently located on the lot approximately 200 feet up the driveway from the residence and will be removed once the attached garage is constructed. The applicant seeks approval of a hardcover variance to permit hardcover in the 75’-250 ’ setback area, to allow 5,841 s.f. (39.267o), where 5,201 s.f. (34.96%) exists, and 3,719.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed. And approval of an average lakeshore setback variance to allow encroachment of 34' into the average lakeshore setback. The existing residence is 1,007 s.f., the applicants are proposing to increase the footprint area of the residence to 2,666 s.f., which is an increase in footprint of 1,659 s.f. Also proposed is to extend the driveway to add an attached garage to the residence. Staff was concerned about the potential drainage impacts created by increasing the size of the structure. The applicants have completed a drainage analysis on the property and have implemented a drainage system to attempt to alleviate drainage concerns. The drainage system includes piping stormwater around the house and driveway to an infiltration system located on the lakeside of the residence. The infiltration area will be a rock bed that would operate similar to a drainfield site for a septic system. The City Engineer (Exhibit F) has commented on the proposed system and has requested additional information for review to ensure the system can be maintained and can successfully route stormwater for the time period the larger home remains on the property. The following variances are required: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover Requirements: Within 75'-250 ‘ of the shoreline there shall be no greater then 25% hardcover. To permit a hardcover variance to allow 5,841 s.f. (39.26%), where 5,201 s.f. (34.96%) exists, and 3,719.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots, except this does not apply to stairways, lifts, landings, and lockboxes. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. To permit a variance to encroach 34' into the average lakeshore setback. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote to: Approval subject to submittal of a grading plan for review and approval by City staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff has met with the applicants on the site to discuss grading and drainage issues. The applicants have revised the grade of the driveway, landing, and provided ways for the drainage to flew around the residence. Staff still has some issues regarding grading and drainage. Please refer to Exhibit F, the City Engineer ’s letter. Staff has concerns on the amount of hardcover on the property and the reasons for hardship, therefore staff recommends denial of this application. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To direct staff to draft resolution for the January 24, 1999 City Council meeting. CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 ZONING FILE # 2539 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 10/20/99 TO:Katherine Taylor Homes 1665 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55356 COPIES: John & Becki Sundet 684 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING 10 /18/99 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below: NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Additional information is requested, as follows: New sur\'ey with grading shown for the driveway and surrounding area. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the November 8, 1999 City Council meeting is October 25, 1999. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (249-4600). Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: No ’.'ember 8,1999 at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. 1 4 .i! IsJ % \ \ % \ •. \ ORONO PLANNING COM^^SSION MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 18,199^ (#2538 Rob and Tori Jaffray, Continued) City Staff is recommending approval^this application. Jaffray had no comment regaraing his application. There were no puhiidxomments. Motion by-Smith, second by Kluth, to recommend approval of Application #2538, 540 Barffett Avenue, granting of a variance for front yard setback to be 25 feet where 50 feet i^/t^uired to allow coratruction of a new roofilne. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0._____________ (#13) #2539 JOHN AND BECKI SUNDET, 684 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCES. 9:04 p.m. - 9:31 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. John Sundet, Applicant, was present, along with Kathy Taylor, Builder. Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to construct a new attached garage and a main floor master bedroom to the residence. A detached garage is currently located on the lot approximately 200 feet up the driveway from the residence and will be removed once the attached garage is constructed. A va.riance to the hardcover in the 75-250' setback is required to permit 39.26 percent ha^cover where 25 percent is allowed as well as a variance to the average lakeshore setback. Weinberger noted that the hardcover in the 0-75' setback as well as the 250-500 ’ setback will be reduced with this proposal. City Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission review the reasons for hardship. Also, Staff has concerns regarding the grade of the driveway to the residence, with some grading being proposed to reduce the grade of the driveway to seven percent. Sundet remarked that the hardcover will be reduced in the 0-75 ’ setback as well as the 250-500* setback, with the structural coverage being limited to 10 percent where 15 percent is normally allov/2d. Removal of the garage near the roadway will improve the appearance of the property. Sundet stated the adjoining property neighbors have submitted letters of support for this application. Sundet stated the motivating factor for this application is the fact that his wife suffers from rheumatoid arthritis and they are attempting to relocate the master bedroom on the first floor. Katherine Taylor stated they are willing to work with Staff regarding the slope of the driveway, which could be reduced somewhat. Taylor stated a house located in this same vicinity with a similar driveway is proposing to do essentially the same thing. Taylor commented that some grading and retaining walls will be necessary with the regrading of the driveway. Lindquist inquired whether the adjoining property owner utilizes their driveway, Sundet stated to his understanding the adjoining property owner utilizes his own driveway, but it is possible that he uses this driveway at times. Sundet remarked that access wilt be cut off. Page 15 B 4 4 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 18,1999 (#2539 John and Beck! Sundet, Continued) Hawn inquired whether retaining walls will be necessary on both sides of the driveway. Taylor stated that they will need to do some grading on both sides of the driveway and that retaining walls will likely be needed. Taylor noted that they will be reviewing the hardcover in the 0-75 ’ setback to see whether they may be reduced in the future. Lindquist inquired what the hardcover consists of in the 0-75 ’ setback. Taylor stated that some timber edging planter areas and sidewalks are located within the 0-75 ’ setback. Taylor stated that the existing deck does extend slightly into the 0-75 ’ setback and that they would like the deck to remain. Weinberger stated that approximately 85 feet of the deck lies within the 0-75 ’ setback. Hawn Inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to reduce the size of the deck. Taylor stated that due to the construction of the deck, they would be unable to reduce the size. Hawn commented that the hardcover is an issue in her opinion. Taylor remarked that the hardcover is being reduced in the 0-75 ’ setback as well as the 250-500’ setback. Sundet indicated that he would like to replace the stairway in the 0-75 ’ setback, which will further reduce the hardcover In that zone. Stoddard commented based on the overall plan showing the reduction in hardcover in the two zones, he would be in favor of this application. Lindquist noted that the structural coverage is under the permitted 15 percent. Smith inquired whether the grade of the driveway needs to be addressed at this time. Weinberger stated that they will need to submit a survey prior to the City Council meeting for review and approval by the City Engineer, noting that the proposed grading work should not impact the adjoining properties. Weinberger pointed out that a four foot retaining wall Is permitted under City Code. There were no public comments regarding this application. Motion by Stoddard, second by Smith, to recommend approval of Application #2539, 684 Tonkawa Road, granting of a variance to hardcover in the amount of 39.26 percent in the 75-250 ’ setback and a variance to the average lakeshore setback to permit construction of an attached garage and a main floor master bedroom to the residence, subject to the submittal of a grading and drainage plan prior to the City Council meeting for review and approval by City Staff. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. Page 16 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator d FROM: DATE: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner October 12, 1999 SUBJECT: #2539 John/Becki Sundet 684 Tonkawa Road Variance — Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area:29,500 s.f. (.68 acres) This application requires the following variances: Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover Requirements: Within 75* to 250’ of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. To permit a hardcover variance to allow 5,841 s.f. (39.26%), where 5,201 s.f. (34.96%) exists, and 3,719.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed. Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots, except this does not apply to stairways, lifts, landings, and lockboxes. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. To permit a variance to encroach 34’ into the average lakeshore setback. Application Sununary: The applicant has proposed to construct a new attached garage and a main floor master bedroom to the residence. A detached garage is currently located t*n the lot approximately 200 feet up the driveway from the residence and will be removed once th'; attached garage is constructed. To permit a hardcover variance to allow 5,841 s.f. (39.26%), wher^j 5,201 s.f. (34.96%) exists, and 3,719.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed. To permit a j iance to encroach 34' into the average lakeshore setback. Staff has reviewed this application as an addition to the r< sidence, not as a rebuild. tf.^jl^yjhn/Becki Sundet ;* Tvf'kawa Road Variance 10/12/99 page-I Lot Area: ANALYSIS LR-IB (1 acre)Lot Area Lot Width Side Yard Setback Required 43,560 s.f.140'10' Proposed 29,564 s.f.85'11.8' Hardcover Calculations: Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0'-75'6,376 s.f.Os.f (0%)1.287 s.f (20.19%) 976 s.f (15.31%) 75'-250'14,878 s.f 3,719.5 (25%)5,201 s.f (34.96%) 5,841 s.f (39.26%) 250'-500*8,310 s.f 2,493 s.f. (30%)3,357 s.f (40.4%) 1,550 s.f (18.65%) Structural Coverage: Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 29,564 s.f Allowed: 4,434.6 s.f(15%) Existing: 1,759 s.f (6%) Proposed: 2,883 s.f (10%) Statement of Hardship: The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. U2539 John/Becki Sundet 684 Tonkawa Road Variance 10/12/99 page-2 Issues for Concern: 1. The existing house was built in 1960. It was at that time located closer to the lakeshore than its neighbors. 2. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation : Staff recommends the Planning Commission review the reasons for hardship. Also, staff has concerns regarding the grade of the driveway to the residence. The survey shows two walls as existing walls, which appears it is a rebuild. Katherine Taylor Homes did not return phone calls regarding this application. Attachments A Application B Site Plan/Survey C Elevation D Plat Map E Location Map F Average Lakeshore Setback G Hardcover Worksheets H Property Owner's List I Permit Record J Letters from neighbors #2539 John/Becki Sundet 684 Tonkawa Road Variance 10/13/99 page 3 P\ Application # Date ReceK’cd Amount Paid ^ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) _ Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $2^.^0 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) __« V: *>. •sL> PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address- Pj> Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) I Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired.Xmonth/year) I (do) ,(do not)^also own the adjacent parcels of land. Presenrtise of property: v»>^residentid ___pother (specify). Zoning District:_____UQ. - ( _____'Sc~.(,v. ______ APPLICANT Name Address: ^SwlKlTf Phone aHm') ____ Phone (work) _____ City: _______Zip: (if dif s: TU OWNER (if differentJhan applicant) Name Address: Phone fhomel 1 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost S ^OOY^ Describe request in detail: M^UO MoRg im *iS»29o*#»Ze>o6 wmL6 Kirfa^ Qqujkj •2>SO-Soo 2ci>ig - ----------------- ^»,AjrL^ (attach additional sb. r ^ it ct*55 iry) liAWfANeB. rHoM VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: ___Lot Width Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage ----------- Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or tmusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: CrAAACt^ LocA'f^b UP ... txJfSH TJ ATT t\.<-^ T& PoR ^ TO m/AStw>^—3gx>*2v^M- S^.PT. TO M/»«4 (attach additional sheets if nec^^) fTooA... K£ej“-A/4. 15-% octeSAu. HAeaco^-. A/A£/£dW (_l3-r. u c^h 'T% /g Bans & Drawings an ntyoty Of:ir>«k>.u, Itiiltt RUMiMimisTa: iMMh»1^|BZ9«7slfSO o ^. —yhi (T">.W..V .» K.. > . «• • •:)7 i Q, Q Plans & Drav/ings are Property o; Katherine Taylor’i Homn, Inc. Use ProhiMed Without Consent Return Ail Prints To: KatherineTaylor (612) 475-1160 r *} Plans & Drawings xq PropsrJy t f: KatharIn* Taylor’s Homes, Inc. Use Prohibited Without Consent Return All Prints To: Kaiherino Tay.'or (6t2) 475*115D ttT r IiLiTD I , I w| Q-/1 Plans & Drawings are Property cf: Katherine Taylor ’s homee, Inc. Use Prohibited Without Consent riftt'jm All Prints To: Katherine Taylc: (612) 475-1160 cf> i j EILEEN ST VATZATA •IVO WOOON 0 ORONO WEAN cm Mprcii- fKNOI HIGH • i C; -iS'V -. • ••• ’. > • •ri-!; I SATS SOMENSET __________ 2 *••••••••••• DERO 91S^ FOl ILM «Af O CO li^ MAP ^=5JnU CO^ *00 tmowoueh |ned ir DEVIN U 4101 Une »•••••• WHITE \ 400 DAHL NO • • 3AV w > CkA **• ;• * • • • * — ..%•*• •. V..Bay\ % • ,1 —I - 41 -'.arm' v*V‘ 'A \ ■:■ '•.■■..Arm .. n -. \ \*. ~ f j- • *■ \i L'-• I • LONGVIEW cm ABMGOON WAT ORO fNENCH LANE NO -•'•'I'. ••' • > ^ i • #% •jT* • '.V ♦ . •! -• • J • . • • • W ^ Z0* *'•* *• j • * >> \N0Hr/^ Trench , \- - y Lake •OHNSirowT \U s #•• • ••« * • • Crystal J o' 9 ■• oh® V* - ■ •. .• ,ORO(i 1600 t • • * hOk i.-.- • Bohns Boint Bay ! Crystal Bay * Ltfiyet^ • % • • p-t • •.”'!j;-V''^ountry C ub • t • 0 « •✓ // 6 015) -PQI’l : COFFIM i GFijr iSEPij L Fh X ? iO. • 47 j 44j>T* v^ui M \ • ^ — ^ Cc:. IE Ir?? li:i3Hn =4 SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ^0*^S ^75-250'250-50C A__House . Lcnjih W;ic:t X X X 7 B. Garage C. Driveway X X /D. Slicwaik X X •• ••E.. P^tlo/peeK ^ ■fc - .* X F. Undsetpe Uoderliin By Plastic X X X G. Other - -TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE . TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IS ZONE tiey ^ B kP^f^X 100 = ppr^pn^F.n HARPrOVER fN ZONE A. • House ________ Lcngib Width X X X .•• •• . B. Garage ’ C. Driveway X X r.— D. ^iewallt X X E. Pa:io/Deck _____ J6CK ^fJ££JL X X • • ••• - F.-Hsafldscape Ct4A6 Uoderlain __________. - By Plasticy iiT^ lAufi X X X G. Other /Met, TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IS ZOSE A - B - - - X 100 » H-Li 'll /‘eu 9-Zf'99 530-1000 ’Rev. A S.F. S.F. S.F S.F. 4£±5 p.-w^C) U'X S.F. SS iX 4-Z tlo .S.E... S.?rCor*£. PAt». B loc S.F. itiCWOtn^ _ 36 $.r. « p - ^ 1287 2222zo._n S.F. S.F. % A' B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.. S.F. S.F. S.F. 9 / S.F. S.F. S.F. ~ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ^J76't S.F. /S. 3 / ^ II A B \OOJ^. S F S.F S.F. S.F. .•s:f. I<?40 S.F.-^ _ S.F. S.F.- __LXS_S.F. - S.F. S.F. 9f)(>S.F. S.F. S.F. ZI0 S.F.” S10/S.F. l4-g7^i S f- _^.xl£L % FROM : COFFIN 2. GFi: EPG Fh ■ f *IJ. • *£!•:>* *1 • i Oct. 13 Irr? llUiAri p: ;hardcover c ..xulat .on ;v ^)k^» ..T7N sdO'tCOO' setback zone * (CIRCLE ONE)o-*;5*75-250’250-503* yiytSTlN^ HARnCQVEP IN* ^QNt. A. House ------------------- /o. S.F <* Length KKi^.h X X X S.F. S.F. A'? S F." ^ KTNH: B. Carege —........... C. Driveway X X _6£0_sp S.F. . 0. SWtw<c’Jc X X t3 s S.F. ~\V<?oC S.F. E. PaUo/peck X X S.F. S.F. F. Landscape _ ■■ * Underlain ' _ -.By Plastic X X •X 3^b S.F. S.F. •S.Fr- C. Other ■ )?)Q S.F.AM3X> £x total Hardcover in zone . TOTAL PROPfcP.TV AREA I.N ZO^E 3^gy -5- B &3ic/r 500 » S.F. gBig £ S.F. ^.'^0. % A 6 1 PROPOSED HAHl^i:OVER IN ZQ>>-£ A. House ___________ * S.F Ijengib Wi4ih X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Garage S.F. C. Driveway a X /ss’a S.F. S.F. D. S'fc.a;k X X S.F. S.F. •• • E. Pario/Deek X X S.F. S.F. F. Landscape Uoderliin By Plastic X X X S.F S.F S.F C. Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - B X lOC S.F. S.F. es y« ^3/C A B 13 RUN DATE 99/lS/^9 BATCH 501 PROP AOOR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR L PROP AMM ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP AOOR ONNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 0 «... 31 'B5-117-2S S3 BOBO BB47B TONKANA RD DAREL J LfciPOLD DAREL J LEIPOLD 47B TONKANA RO LONG LAKE NN 55354 SB BC>il7>2S SS BBll BB4B4 TONKANA rj J SUNDET I R ^UNOET JOHN t REDP^CA SUNDET 4S4 TONK//A RD LONG lake NN 55354 SB BS-117-2S SS BB14 BB7BB TONKANA RD T H SPOONER I J N SPOONER TED H SPOONER 1BB65 SUNAC CIR EDEN PRAIRIE NN 55347 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORNATION SYSTEH PROPERTY ONNERS LIST 34 B5-117-23 S3 BBB9 BB47B TONKANA RO GEORGE L TORKELSON ETAL GEORGE L TORKELSON 47B TONKANA RD LONG LAKE NN 55354 SB B5-117-2S SS BBI2 BB49B TONKANA RD N S BRADLEY ION BRADLEY NICHAEL S I OLIVIA N BRADLEY 1SBB5 IVYNOOO ST N W ANDOVER NN 55304 SB B5-117-23 S3 BB19 BB44S TONKANA RD TENPLE ISRAEL OF NIKHEAPOLIS TEHPLE ISRAEL OF NINNEAPOLIS 2324 EMERSON AVE S MPLS NN 55405 REPORT NO. PI4354B1 PAGE 4 SB B5-117-2S SS BBIB BB4BB TONKANA RD MELINDA LEE MELINDA LEE 4BB TONKANA RO LONG LAKE NN 55354 SB BS‘I17-2S SS BBIS BB492 TONKANA RD BARBARA PUGH BARBARA PUGH 492 TONKANA RO LONG LAKE m 55354 TOTAL BATCH 501 OOOtB ■IQ rt\ I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION Of INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION* TO THE BEST OF MY KNONLEDGE AND BELIFF. DATE F. ^ PERHIT RECORD Permit No.Date Type of Permit /ueiu mjL C/f/g A^r* _______S/K VJLAS t- y-74 izs2/- NOOk^^t^ v5'^5<'. 9-^g'-yv UXtJJ ~y]ij (lJ^—■ j FROM : JOHN PHONE NO. : 612 591 2654 Oct. 13 1999 05:06Afl’ P3 Jf'b) Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sundet,Oct. 11,1999 We understand you are meeting with the Qrono Planning Commission, in Uio near iuture. We have had an opportunity to review the plans you provided regarding planned improvements to the Tonkawa Road property located next door to our home at 690 Tonkawa Road. Although it is impossible ibr us to vi.<nialize the finished project, the plans appear to be a great improvement to the property and would seem to fit in nicely. We have no issues with your project at Ais time except to ask toat you get as much done this yoar as possible so as to complete die wmk before the next summer season. Your neighbors to the south, Mike and Olivia Bradley ^ i 1fA539 KENT AND BARBARA MC CREIGHT 692 TONKAWA ROAD LONG LAKE. MN 5j 356 612 471-7656 OCTOBF.R 12, 1999 KATHERINE TAYLOR’S HOMES, INC. 1665 CO. ROAD 24 MEDINA, MN 55336 RE: REMONDELING FOR JOHN & BECKISUNDET DEAR KATHY, THIS LETTER IS TO LET YOU KNOW WE THINK THE PROPOSED REMODELING YOU ARE GOING TO DO ON THE PROPERTY AT 684 TONKAWA ROAD WILL ADD TOTHE VALUE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WE HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE. YOUR WORKMANSHIP AND QUALITY OF WORKERS IS EXCELLENT. WE KNOW THE SUNDET’S WILL BE AS PLEASED AS WE ARE WITH THE REMODELING OF OUR HOME. THANK YOU AGAIN FOR THE GREAT JOB. SINCERELY. BARBARA PUGH-MCCREIGHT 1 .1 3E L I I S §HASTCRBORM maU'tl -r44ig-r4—^ t _, no [ ------------J£l 6REAT ROOM ’(Y'ieed noer)~ * M4K1T6 rt -l^r-•» d lAUHORT 'CNTKT T4»y^' MASTER BATH MinU‘* y CLOSET *-3»T CLOSEt ««Ti 15^ • •• f «iiho. S 6ARA6E 3v*m • 7 C • *•••• •••• • • ••c •••••••••••^A•••••• ••••••••• *w^Y* • • • • ARBOFW -L -SJ LIV1N6AREA iMf Mt T -L liill“ ^ ^ --<g , > - t-d - I"’. .........<i'k> I. ■ • -..ti} fL..V./ r>T'^ r------ • • P'2Ds & Ordw,T.Q£ a;e Prop9r>'. '”• ^*y*®f'* Hoa«, Inc. Use ProhiMed Without ConsentReturn Ail Prints To: Katherine Taylof {612} 475-1130 Plans & Drav/ings are Property o ‘: Katharine Tayior't Homei, Inc. Use Prohibied Without Consent Return All Prints To: Katherine Taylor (612) 475-1160 ■1 il !'■ ■■ ■■ ■■ R 1 4-13M U=J > ■ Cfi * m m ■^4^ i ^MMakTc r'» 'b rv\ : 1' I I rr ' Vt- n Flans & Dr^wi^.gl a^e Pfopsr*. • Katharin* Taylor's Homes, Inc. Use Prohibited Without Conse.nt Rat'jrn Ail Prints To: Kolhc'i.'io Taylor \BV2) 475-1130 m -C Bonestroo Rosene vn ■ Anderlik & |\ I Associates Engineers & Architects January 5,2000 Wendy Boltcnbcrg Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re: Katherine Taylor Site Plan File No. 139-2539 Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderhk ,md AssooMes. inc is dn AffirmMive Action Bqu^t Opportunity Employer Principals Otto G Boneitroo. PE • Joseph C Anderlik. PE • Viirvin L SorvaM. PE. • Glenn R Cook. PE • Robert G Schunicht. PE • Jerry A Bourdon. PE • Robert W Rosene. PE. Richard E Turner, PE. and Susan M Eberlin. C PA . Senior Consultants Assoa^ite Principals Howard A Sanford. PE • Keith A. Gordcr' PE • Robert R Pfefferle. PE • Richard W Foster. PE • David O LosKota. PE • Robert C Russek. A IA • Mark A. Hanson. PE • Michael T Rautmann. PE • Ted K Field. PE • Kenneth P Anderson. PE • Mark R. Rolfs. PE. • Sidney P Williamson. PE. L S • Robert F Kotsmith • Agnes M Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE. Offices St. Paul. Rochester. Willmar and St Cloud. MN • Milwaukee Wl WeOsite WWW bonestroo com Dear Wendy: We have reviewed the site plan (revised 12/28/99) for the proposed improvements on the Sundet property. The site is located on the east side of C.S.A.H. 135 (Tonkawa Road) in the southwest quarter of Section 5. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. • The proposed driveway grades have been revised to 12% with a 1.7% landing area provided along Tonkawa Road. The driveway is steeper than we recommend but is acceptable as shown. The plans .should identify proposed diiveway surfacing and curb and gutter. • The cross sections provided show grading within 5 feet of the property lines. The plans show that the existing retaining wall on the south side of the property may need to be replaced. It still may be necessary to acquire easements from the neighbors to allow for retaining wall replacement or storage of excavated materials. • The proposed storm sewer design raises the following questions that need to be answered: 1. How will silt be kept out of the drainfield? 2. What soil identif :ation or percolation tests have been performed in the proposed drainfield area? Th s information shoulu be submitted for review with the final storm system design. 3. How will the system work in the winter? What provisions have been made to accommodate flows if the system plugs up? 4. What storm event is the drainfield designed for? We recomr.iend that the minimum drainfield storage capaciiv be for a one year storm event. 5. What is the top elevation of the rock bed? 6. Has the existing sanitary sewer, located approximately where the proposed drainfield is shown, been accounted for? The location and elevation of the existing sewer should be verified and shown in both plan and profile views. 7. What is the maintenance plan or schedule for the storm system? It is critical that a maintenance plan be developed and followed so that th: system continues to function as designed. 8. The property owner should be aware that erosion problems are likely and will need to be repaired as they occur. Details should be provided for the proposed retaining wall. The plans should provide additional erosion control measures in disturbed areas due to the steep slopes on the site. At a minimum, disturbed areas should be restored immediately with staked sod cr seed and fiber blanket. Please contact me at (651) 604-4863 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIAfES, INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gappa, City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 > 651636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 Application Date: Completion Date: 60 Day Deadline: COUMCn. MEETING JAN 2 4 20001/04/00 1/04/00 3/04/00 Cl I r ur unwivu REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 1/20/00 ITEM rvO.: Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description:#2557 Daniel J. and Judith K. McAthie 1449 Bay Ridge Road Variance Zoning District:LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 Acre) Lot Area:42,784 s.f (.98 acres) Application: The applicant's have applied for variances to permit the addition of a garage and living space to the existing residence. They are proposing to raise the roof of the existing residence for additional living space on the second story. They are also proposing enlarge the garage approximately 250 s.f. and reducing the size of the turn around in the driveway. The amount of hardcover in the 75-250’ setback area will be reduced by 495 s.f. (2.43%). The residence was built at its present location in 1967 and now requires variances for side yard setback and average lakeshore setback. The requested variances are for: 1 . Section 10.23, Subd. 6(B): Lot Yard Requirements: Side Yard: To permit a 10.62 ’ setback to the north property line and a 9.93 ’ setback to the south property line where 30 ’ setback is required. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: To permit a variance for the second story addition to encroach 20’ into the average lakeshore setback. 3. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover: Within 75-250’ of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. To permit a hardcover variance to allow 5,745.5 s.f (28.27%), where 6,241 s.f (30.7%) exists, and 5,081 s.f (25%) is allowed. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 5 to 0 vote to: Approve the application as presented. w I STAFF RECOM lMENDATION: To approve the enclosed insolation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUEi^TED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1(B) & 2; AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C) (6) & (L) (2); AND SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6(B) FILE NO. 2557 WHEREAS, Daniel J. McAthie and Judith K. McAthie, husband and wife, (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 1449 Bay Ridge Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Tracts C and P, Registered Land Survey No. 192, Subject to easement for County Road 15, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 19, 2000, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6) to allow the construction of an addition to the garage and an addition to the second story of the e.xisting home that encroaches 20' into the average lakeshore setback and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2) to allow 5,745 s.f. (28.27%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback area where 6,241 s.f. (30.7%) exists and 5,081 s.f (25%) is allowed and per Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to allow a side yard setback of 10.62' to the north property line and 9.93' setback to the south property line where 30' setback is required. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: Page 1 of 6 I 1 M mmr ■ FINDINGS 1. 2. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2557. This property is located in the LR-1A Zoning District, where 2 acres or 87,120 s.f. is the minimum lot area. The property consists of approximately .98 acres or 42,784 s.f. 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 19,2000 and recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. B. C. The lot is unusually shaped undersized for the LR-1 A Zoning District. The amount of hardcover in the 75-250' setback area is being reduced from 6,241 s.f. (30.7%) to 5,745 s.f. (28.27%). The residence was built in 1967 prior to standards being adopted for hardcover and average lakeshore setback. 5. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighlx>ring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 6 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)(6) to allow the construction of an addition to the garage and an addition to the second story of the existing home that encroacht s 20' into the average lakeshore setback and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2) to allow 5,745 s.f. (28.27%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback area where 6,241 s.f. (30.7%) exists and 5,081 s.f. (25%) is allowed and per Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to allow a side yard setback of 10.62' to the north property line and 9.93' setback to the south property line where 30' setback is required. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this resolution on Page 6. Any amendments to the site plan may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (January 24, 2001). Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 6 Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of January, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Property Owner (s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of January, 2000 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) On this day of,2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared_______________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this__________day of____., 2000, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared__________ -_______________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public oil Page 5 of 6 M '■ \ \ t a a C ■-*'••• M. • • I ADVAfta smnfWG 4 mhcoommiho ca. t^rnmmwm ^m^rnrnnrn MAWUOMSa iHC I -i nm<—*■*>•>—fip^^ .rnftm mmrn WiSKs: miess9tisssssu^^m^>m ffeop fliufwe acAiJ I ■nwl o VO &4 -------------------- i£L4^A, CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 ZONING FILE # 2557 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: January 20,2000 TO; Judith K. and Daniel J. McAthie 1449 Bay Ridge Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: Kathy Alexander Alexander Design Group, Inc. 401 East Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: January 19,2000 VOTE: 5 FOR AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted. Applicant’s next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council on January 24,2000 at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available fi’om the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: SUBJECT: January 14,2000 #2557 Dan and Judith McAthie 1449 Bay Ridge Road Variance ~ Public Hearing Zoning Dutrict: LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential District ^acre) Lot Area:42,784 s.f. (.98 acre) This application requires the following variances; Section 10.23, Subd. 6(B): Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements: Side yard: The minimum requirement shall be observed for side yard setback: 30 feet. To permit a 10.62' setback to the north property line and a 9.93 ’ setback to the south property line where 30' setback is required. Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots, except this does not apply to stairways, lifts, landings, and lockboxes. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. To permit a variance for the second story addition to encroach 20' into the average lakeshore setback. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover: Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. To permit a hardcover variance to allow 5,745.5 s.f. (28.27%) where 6,241 s.f (30.7%) exists and 5,081 s.f.(25%) is allowed. Application Summary: The applicants have applied for variances to permit the addition of a garage and living space to the existing residence. They are proposing to raise the roof of the existing residence for additional living space on the second story. They are also proposing to enlarge the garage approximately 350 s.f. and reducing the size of the turn around in the driveway. The amount of hardcover in the 75- 250' setback will be reduced by 495.5 s.f (2.43%). The residence was built at its present location in 1967 and now requires variances for side yard setback and average lakeshore setback. The applicants seek approval of variances for side yard setback, average lakeshore setback and hardcover in the 75-250' setback area. H2557 DanieVJudith McAthie 1449 Bay Ridge Road Variances 1/14/00 Page I ANALYSIS Lot Area: LR-IA Lot Area Side Yard Setback Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres)30' Actual 42,784 s.f. (.98 acre)9.93' (south) 10.62' (north) Structural Coverage : Total Lot Size Total Strucjura! Coverage 42,784 s.f.Allowed: 6,417.6 s.f. (15%) Existing: • 3,7 jti s.f. (8.7%) Proposed: 4,088 s.f. (9.5%) Hardcover Calculations: Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing hardcover Proposed hardcover O' - 75'1,648 s.f.0%98 s.f (5.9%)98 s.f (5.9%) 75' - 250'20,324 s.f.5,081 s.f. (25%) 6,241 s.f (30.7%) 5,745.5 s.f (28.27%) 250' - 500’20,812 s.f.6,243.6 s.f. (30%) 4,142 s.f (20%) 3,708 s.f (17.8%) Statement of Hardship : The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. #2iJ7 DanieL Judith McAthie 1449 B(P Ridge Road Variancti 1/14/00 Page 2 mmm Issues of Concern : 1. Xhe residence was constructed in 1967 and at that time it was located closer to the lakeshore than the adjacent neighboring properties. 2. The amount of hardcover in the 75' - 250' setback area is being reduced. 3. Other issues the Planning Commission may have. Staff Recommendation : Staff recommends approval of variances for side yard setback, average lakeshore setback and hardcover in the 75' - 250' setback eirea. Exhibits A Application B Site Plan/Survey C Floor Plans D ElevationsA^iews E Hardcover Calculations F Average Lakeshore Setback G Topographic Map H Plat Map 1 Location Map J Property Ov ner’s List K Permit Record H2557 Daniel/Judith McAthie 1 449 Bay Ridge Road Variances 1/14/00 Page 3 A CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming st.uctures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION _ ^ Site Address \A^ Application U Date Received I Amount Paid 3 OO - ({<jYvp- f/^loO Property Identification Number (P.I.D.), - ••Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date ProggiJx^cquired_______11—_________________________ I (do)/(2(o not^^so own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) Present usFw property: residential Zoning District: 1—^ \ ^ other (specify). APPLICANT ^ Name ) .J~. jfV\^ Phone Oiome^ ■ T YY\^ Phnnf. rwork’t A ^--------Zip;.Address:. OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home’) Lt Phone (work) fOrr\C. Address:/VV<» City: 4v>oy/02!fe---------Z‘P: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail; tritr 1 iJ f off or* Vi Estimated Construction Cost $ A s/aucle (a^ch ^diltional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback; ___Lot Width Front Sid( Lot CoverageHardcover _ Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS (attach additional sheets if necessaiy) ^ \ *■ 19 .• \‘ 6 REQUIRED SUBMITTAl S All of thg. fgllpwing information must be submitted bv the application rfpa^line datg in for vour application to be considered complete: 2. ^ 3. XI Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8*/2" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In. addition, provide one (1) copy 8 ’A" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/2" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour vanantt appllgatioiv.ig not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant e.xpenses incuired in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and ctyrect to jhe best of his/her knowledge. Applicant’s Signature . Date 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. /Z./2//ff OWTMER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature _ /1/yy:3fr, j Date f J Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make ^angements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. JX.nrrr ■ J V•. • '■- -^ ry J 0 • t mm wtiMi mrnmmwK. ADVAMCE SUMVETMO A BNGOmUONO Ctt f rnmmiwm mmfummwm MSfUm SAWKOMSB me •«aaB t »»m mmm M fgsagL*--,.-. OtAfWC KALI ♦ (P cOb.) •• I . I ^ ‘ % • \1 I •: I .,- '5. ^ •• I Ik • ill/ . •N% : i .'I • ./ /:-• ■ \ \ •. • .7•7 I * -r *j<w -.»"u ‘^-',*»-iT—i, -1 -------- yBpKfT gLes//tfpo4 Pe&ioeMtfe B a r- - '■ • ■■■ W-. TJ I.r.^ ■ . ' / ■ -r:v / r V-X HfrArvhe t/4*WtVei' jy-C M ■ fly - ____ A */>0 u/ ^o £ V • •• ’• i-ll U>-iM. TH 1 £6 1 29T490I 8 P.03 HARDCOVER * SrrBACKZOKSt (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* gYfSTINt; BARPCOVER IN ZONE A. Houm - * X X X 2S0-S00* WM* B. — C. Drivrwty _ D. 8id*w*lk £. Pttlo/Dcdi uall F. 1 gubcmpt Uodtrliin By Fliitk X X X X X X X X X Q. other ortr fttotal HARDCOVER IN ZONE NOUSB jAirtiCOVgR IN ZONE B. Omit C. Drtv«v«y X X X X X <g-.-ttWr>p # 5C>rc S. Pido/Dcck . tOoJZJ? •. •. F. Lmdssip* Underhh By PUsdc X X X 0. Other mrV. 0o*>-~^oJi x TOTAL HARDCOVER m ZONE total property area in zone ,«o ♦ B X 100 - u ; :• : J . / tfa:z ZTJ ... n r-T/-*u e4al5) 800-11 i/p ^ g.-. S.F. USH IS. SJ. SJ. &P. SJ. 8J. HkL itUU SJ. $J. $J. RF. SJ. iSJ. 8J. S’ sr. ux*//fc-aw^ _sj. A ■7io tayy SJ. B w- H 30.1*7 o SJ. SJ. si^. SJ. SJ. lo4^.^ SJ. __S«F» 40 144* S/2-. 8J. SJ. S.F. SJF. SJ.ve. IF.- Jc^ ^ . *• • It* I •t.. 1 I a'a»k> 1 fc!F*. 0*4 HARDCOVER CALCUllATloIrWOBKSH^r • sinACKZONEt (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* 7S.250* ^5M00/ ^ (3|e>) 500-1000* rn HARncovat IN ZONE A. Houtt -- _____ Wl«li k X B. Gtnft C Mvtwqr X X D. Sldawiik X X E Fttb/Deck X X P. Imiltfuw Undtrlain By PiiKic X X X 0. Oibfr total hardcover in zone total property area in zone Hiwi. ♦ B ^ \ vaOMSED lARDTOVm IN ZONE ■ » A. Moutr-H X X X . SP.■ m SP. f# pi SP. m SP. m SP. m SP. m ,SP. m SP. m __SP. mm m SP. C 0 • m m MM • . s^- -SP. m m 8P. SP. 8.F.A - p • V 100 * Z/> i9t 2^ SP. 9/) % » ^ m S.F. m _SP. • a c«i|e c Drtviwty X X D. SideWlOl X X E. PtiioO^k X X F. Landac^ Undtrlfiin By PUsiic X X X •P. SP. $.P. '?no^S.P. __SP. IF. SP. IP. S.P. iJ. S.P. 0# Odltf __SP. 8P. TOTAL HARDCOVER IK ZONE * ^nofe ’ it. A '■7ofSt^ 5P. B-Jlf- jt TRHT P fid include^ 11 t ** V iV) CA Iculfil'I'f^ilSxs ♦--I.. ... !** • V rr*. ' *' ^ 1 *: ^ (( 7 } V r--i It L 1- ^ L/tM A .r: LI -t- 1*1* ttw I 1 If r.i^ i __________J -n fli. $M m «al«» •it* *•••< te3» cn> CEiD CZl f——• i.-------i •CZ3 a CO CO o t ■ 4 o ▲ UK* cvkvcai ««4i - taiocc • ciAtiai iMC/rM tiac«fi •tAlaACf ilH talk laci ctfia IIIAI# auc outitic fiBCf 6*. •uliiias •wiitiBt - nBOca coMia. tiauctuaft coacatic ii*a fvtfviiaa aoQL BfcacuiaaM. atfutft •laat urn ml ftatit itcaf Vfliltf Mf lAiiatit ticm aAuaaat t«itc« cmuh O caaiaoi. • «iai. »aauBt caataoimiifwffiai. CZP llt.l iMa casiaua • laifafcaiatl caatoya acaaiuiaa caataua aatcaaca caaiaiia taai iiiwAiiaa S«aU •• !••• io-tn-A3 CRYSTAL 57) K 80 « (51) « ---1 K 1 175 J 8 » (52) * 175 5*m • j (54)g vi eo1—1 ^y>09ZLJl(55)8 :s 87.5 CO 87.5 87.5 S«091—<8 ® 8 (K)S •X 87.^80 87.5 87.5 (24 F(X ••[ORONQ\ iioaa t 1600 • • rrx>..: A. .. *. ^ •f • • •• • • • . • ^ •T-. •: * ;'.; ••; ./' : * • H • » 1* lAi ^ raiNOAU I RO *.•. • ■•-. • •• • . •■' • . . *^ . •. •. %•.; -• . • • * •*• *• • •. * • * j. * *. ’.■ * • ’ • •• • • • .• * •. ' ;rv \ ,. '\:Lookou\ - .. .. Point 5 • ,••» **«^»»*. ^ • . « ..• *1; •• • •*. • “• • % . . ••• A • • • * * • . 4?* • •NKA . :• : -ia 'A l_l V." .* .l«i M* /• y '•* ^ ••.. •* f: •♦ .■'•’■ ifir I ■* •. •••• •• .**-* • JH - rM^JS/^y:.‘ -:-y etteBaj^ • «•[• I "^. i mm DATE 12/1S/99 •ATCM SIS HENNEPIN COUNTY PPOPEITV INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PMSS401 PAGE 2 OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR SO 10-117-23 11 0102 00050 AOORESS UNASSIGNED HCLEOD CNTY REG RAIL AUTH DAKOTA RAIL INC 25 ADANS ST N HUTCHINSON HN 55S50 SO 10-117-23 33 0002 02245 NORTH SHORE OR KINGSLEY H NURPHY JR KINGSLEY H NURPHY JR 22AS NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA NN 55391 SO 10-117-23 34 0003 01449 DAY RIDGE RD 0 D t 0 D NESTDY GERALD D A DIANE D NESTBV 1449 DAY RIDGE RD ORONO HN 55391 PROP AOOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR .30 10-117-23 34 0004 01441 DAY RIDGE RD H J JOHNSON ASF JOHNSON HICHAEL J A SUSAN F JOHNSON 1441 DAY RIDGE RD WAYZATA HN 55391 30 10-117-23 34 0005 01473 DAY RIDGE RD T R A N H HCCUNE THOHAS R HCCUNE 1473 DAY RIDGE RD WAYZATA HN 55391 5S 10-117-23 34 0017 01425 DAY RIDGE RD SUSAN S TENNEY SUSAN S TEENEY/AC2100002 C/0 NORWEST-W STUKEL-PCS 4TH A NAROUETTE NAC N9S0S105 NPLS HN 55479 PROP AOOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR TOTAL HATCH 513 00004 38 10 117 23 34 ADDRESS PENDING ROY E AHERN COUNTY OF HENNEPIN PUBLIC SERVICE R/W 320 WASHINGTON AVE HOPKINS MN 55343 0011 38 10 117 23 34 0013 AOORESS UNASSIGNED ROY E AHERN ROY E AHERN 1120 FRONT ST HUDSON WI 54016 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE _ _ REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECMDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE REST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND RELIEF. 7/ .. • .• ••'5 /if PERMIT RECORD Permit No. \wri S-A7 __‘5-/-n 1-^75 5'?->7 5-hi ^5CQ_„5 “7/ 6-?3'SI 637?7- H -R| JJJ2 S"Wfi-n Date Type of Permit Acin! r o 4^1/mhn. 0 iB oiO. r K ’SciA.Ltim y Po/m rrl o S -'■S-3. 9!^ Z/0 3‘7 ------rdrl. /J-i. 9X A^.aJJ'^A/ COIINCIL MEEHNQ JAN 2 4 2000 Gn Y OHONO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January 24, 2000 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer ’s Repon Item Description: Policy on Time Frame for Connection to Sanitary Sewer Introduction The City’s current Septic Code requires connection to sanitary sewer within sixteen months from the date sewer is available. This rule has been in effect for many years and was valid for past sewer projects in which lakeshore neighborhoods containing numerous failing septic systems, with surface discharges or cesspools were being sewered. The type of sewer projects that are being completed today are different. The projects being completed now are the result of recent changes to the State Septic Regulations regarding noncompliant systems. These changes are based on a more stringent interpretation of the 3' separation rule to the seasonal highest level of groundwater. Under the new rules, systems are deemed to be noncompliant to the 3' separation rule based on the presence of any amount of "soil mottling." This has resulted in approximately 400 septic systems, throughout the City, being noncompliant to the 3' separation rule. These systems have been functioning adequately for many years and are not an imminent threat to public health and safety. Yet, the new State Codes consider such systems as "failing" by definition. From Orono’s perspective, at least in terms of priority for needing attention, there js a distinction between "noncompliant" and "failing" septic systems. Failing septic systems have cesspools or surface discharge of waste. Failing systems pose an imminent threat to public health and safety and need to be replaced or connected to sewer as soon as possible. Systems that merely don’t meet a 3' separation from mottling may possibly be doing less than an adequate job of treating sewage at times of seasonal saturation. Soil Mottling is an indicator that seasonal saturation is possible for some parts of the year. This seasonal saturation is highly variable from year to year and, might range from only a few days to a few months of the year. During saturation the aerobic soil treatment processes cease. These systems do not pose a threat to health and safety, as there is no surface discharge, and they only affect the perched groundwater near the surface. Water supply wells are not affected because there is adequate soil for treatment above the deeper groundwater used for domestic purposes. There have also been other policy changes regarding the sanitary sewer connection requirements. Recently, the City policy has been changed to allow property owners with compliant septic systems to request exclusion from sewer projects. The property does not have to connect to sewer as long as the septic system remains compliant. Any future rule changes that render the system noncompliant, any building additions, or new house construction that requires enlargement of the septic system require connection to sewer. A connection fee is payable before connection to the sewer is allowed. This connection is the project assessment adjusted annually for inflation. The debt service for properties approved for exclusion is financed by the City until the property is connected to sewer. In the Orono Orchards sewer project, a revision was made to the project exclusion policy. A property owner with a compliant septic system agreed to be included in the project assessment, but requested that connection to the sewer not be required now. The Council approved delaying the requirement for connection to sewer as long as the system remained compliant. Sewer connection would be required if the system became noncompliant or required expansion because of a building project. Approval of this request was in the best interests of the City because including the project in the assessment eliminated the City’s financing of the debt service charges. A South Brown Road resident, who has the option of being included in the Fox Ridge sewer project, has questioned the City’s policies regarding sewer connection. The property owner has a noncompliant septic system, due to lack of a 3' separation, that needs to be replaced within seven years. The system has been functioning well for many years, and no house remodeling or addition projects are planned. He is interested in the possibility of being included in the project, but does not want to connect to sewer at this time. Connecting to the sewer at a later date would reduce the financial impacts of the project on this owner. The annual project assessments decrease every year, and a future connection would allow him time to pay the SAC fee and save money for the connection costs. Including the resident in the project assessment will lower the costs for the other property owners, so there is a benefit in adding this property to the project. The question is if he requests to be assessed for sewer; Why does he need to connect to sewer within sixteen months, but if he does not want sewer the septic system does not have to be replaced for seven years? This is a valid question that deserves consideration. It is in the best long term interests of the City to have properties connected to sewer, so policies that could discourage connection to sewer may not be wise. The project assessments, in the areas currently being sewered, are already higher than the costs for a septic system. Therefore, any City policy changes that encourage sewer connection are a good idea. If the property owners are included in the project assessments, there are no financial costs to the City from delaying connection to the sewer. For septic systems that are only noncompliant to the 3' separation rule, the adverse impacts to public health and safety are negligible. Should any of these systems become "failing" due to surface discharge immediate connection to sewer would still be required. The recent policy changes regarding sewer projects that resulted in the residents adjacent to South Brown Road being allowed the "option" of being included in the Fox Ridge project may also generate concerns about City sewer policies. According to the current City policies, the property owners in the Fox Ridge MUSA expansion project area can only request exclusion from the project if they have a compliant septic system. For all other properties, sewer connection is required within sixteen months. Inclusion in the project is optional for the South Brown Road residents, so they can decide not to participate in the project now and have up to seven years to replace their septic system or connect to sewer. The Fox Ridge MUSA expansion residents have already questioned the City ’s assessment policies. Including more South Brown Road properties in the project reduces the project assessment, which should lessen the Fox Ridge residents concerns. Changes in City Sewer Connection Policy Based on the above listed concerns and recent changes in the type of sewer projects being completed, our recommendation is that ihe Council consider changing the requirements for connection to sewer. The proposed changes would allow for a delayed hookup to sewer for properties with systems that are noncompliant to the 3' separation rule, until the date that replacement of the septic system is required. This change would reduce the financial impact from sewer projects, and will probably increase the number of properties that choose to connect to sewer versus replacing septic systems. Proposed changes to the sewer connection section of the Septic Code are listed below for your consideration. Section 12.30 City of Orono Municipal Code B. Jurisdiction. The provisions of this Section shall apply to the method of sewage disposal from every building within the City intended for human use or habitation, whether such use is permanent, temporary or seasonal, regardless of the date of original construction or use. 1. The owners of all buildings where etty municipal sewer is available or becomes available, shall connect the buildings to the etty municipal sewer subject to the following conditions, within sixteen (1 6) months of the availability of the sewer acco rding to the provisions of the City Code. A. A compliant system will not be required to connect to municipal sewer until the system becomes non-compliant or the building undergoes major remodeling resulting in an increase in water use that exceeds the capacity of the septic system. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the building is connected to the municipal sewer. B. A nop-compliant system due to a lack of a three-foot separation must connect to the municipal sewer system within the same time frame that septic system replacement would be required. C. A failing system that is discharging sewage to surface must connect to the municipal sewer; within ninety (90) davs. We are currently working on revising the entire Septic Code to include recent changes in State and County regulations and make the Code simpler and easier to understand. These changes will be presented for Council consideration this winter. We are requesting Council consideration of these proposed revisions, regarding the time frame required for connection to sanitary sewer, at this lime. A Neighborhood Informational Meeting and Public Hearing are scheduled for the Fox Ridge Area sewer project, and we would like to obtain Council direction on these proposed changes before these sewer project meetings. Any changes that the Council may decide to make in the Septic Code would be included in the upcoming code revision, so now we are requesting Council consideration of conceptual approval for the proposed changes. This will allow any changes to be presented to the project area residents at the upcoming meetings for the Fox Ridge sewer project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Consideration of w^nceptual approval for the above described revisions to the City ’s Septic Code, regarding time frames for connection to sanitary sewer, with any code changes included in the upcoming Septic Code revisions. ♦l t',- coi iKir.u meeting JAN 2 4 2000 Cl I Y Oh OMUINU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January 24, 2' ITEM NO.: ^ III! Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Schedule Public Hearing for Foxridge Sanitary Sewer Project A Public Hearing was previously held for this project. At this hearing, the property owners questioned the cost allocation for the project. The 1996 MUSA expansion only included the Fox Ridge Neighborhood and the two adjacent properties on South Brown Road. To provide sewer service to the neighborhood, a force main needs to be installed north along South Brown Road to the Watertown Road intersection where it will connect to the City of Long Lake sewer system. The original concept was that the property owners in the Fox Ridge MUSA expansion project area would be assessed for all of the project costs including the South Brown Road force main. The residents questioned the fairness of their being assessed for all of the costs if residents along SouthBrown Road may connect to this sewer in the future. At the January lO*** Council meeting, the City’s Policy on cost allocations for sewer projects was discussed. The Council directed staff to contact all of the properties, adjacent to South Brown Road, that would have a sewer force main installed past their property to see if they are interested in connecting to sewer as part of this project. The project costs would then be split among all of the properties that participate in the project. A letter has been sent to the ten South Brown Road property owners scheduling a Neighborhood Informational Meeting for Tuesday, February S'** to discuss the project. We will then determine the amount of interest for participation in the project among the South Brown Road residents. The estimated assessment per unit, for a pressure sewer system, if only the residents in the Fox Ridge MUSA expansion area participate, is $23,600. For estimating purposes, if 3 of the 10 South Brown Road residents participate in the project, the estimated assessment per unit is $18,800. This assessment will vary depending on the number of participating properties. Another Public Hearing will need to be held by the City Council to obtain public comments on the expanded project. We are recommending scheduling this Public Hearing for the February 28'^ Council meeting. L COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the Installation of Sanitary Sewer in the Fox Ridge Area. Approve Resolution Receiving Report and Calling for Hearing on the Fox Ridge Sanitary Sewer Improvements. C)roii>io GITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Par1(way Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323-0066 January 14, 2000 Dear Project Area Residents; The City of Orono has scheduled a Neighborhood Informational Meeting to obtain resident comments on a proposed sanitary sewer project to serve the Fox Ridge/ 5outh Brown Road Neighborhood. This Neighborhood Meeting will be held at 7:00 P.M. Tuesday, February 8th at the Orono City Council Chambers. Project Background Information and Purpose of the Neighborhood Meeting The Fox Ridge Neighborhood was included in the recent Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) expansions for sanitary sewer installation because of the smaller lot sizes, and nonconforming septic systems with limited replacement sites available. This area is one of ten neighborhoods included in the recent MUSA expansions. Sewer projects have already been completed in seven of these areas with the final three projects scheduled for completion this summer. A previous Neighborhood meeting and Public Hearing was held for the residents in the Foxridge Neighborhood. At these meetings, the neighborhood residents requested that the area adjacent to South Brown Road, between the Fox Ridge Neighborhood and Watertown Road, be included in the project area. The sewer line to serve the Fox Ridge Neighborhood will be installed along South Brown Road and will connect to the City of Long Lake sewer system at the Watertown Road intersection, so a sewer line will be located adjacent to the South Brown Road properties. Including the Brown Road properties will result in lower assessments for all of the residents, as the project costs will be split among all the participating properties. The City Council approved adding the South Brown Road properties to the project if th? prQpcrty owners are interested in connecting to the sewer system. The purpose of the Neighborhood meeting, for the South Brown Road residents, is to determine your interest in obtaining sanitary sewer service. Several of these properties have nonconforming septic systems with lumted replacement sites available. Telephone (612) 2494600 • Fax (612) 2494616 m History of the Project and Evolution of the City ’s Sewer Policy An understanding of the project history, and City sewer policies, is necessary to fully understand the evolution of this project. For the last twenty years, City policy has been to only provide sewer to the existing older developed areas of the City. New development in the two and five- acre residential zones requires individual wells and septic systems. This polic> has been in place to limit the density of development in the City in order to protect the lakes and wetlands from excessive storm water runoff. For areas to be eligible for sanitary sewer, they had to be included within the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA). Approval from the Metropolitan Council is required for any changes to the MUSA. In 1996, the City obtained MUSA expansions to sewer ten existing developed neighborhoods with smaller lots in which the options for septic systems were limited. The Fox Ridge Neighborhood was one of the MUSA expansion areas. At the time these MUSA expansions were obtained, it was very difficult for the City to obtain MUSA expansions. Therefore the expansion areas were limited, only to specific neighborhoods. The areas adjacent to the sewer lines required to serve the neighborhoods were not included in the project. Since the MUSA expansions were obtained, both the City ’s and Metropolitan Council’s policy toward the provision of sewer service has been changing. The Metropolitan Council authorized the City to connect fifty units to sewer, if they were adjacent to an existing sewer line, without a MUSA amendment. The City ’s first policy change was that sewer service for properties located adjacent to sewer lines, but outside the MUSA line, would only be provided if the property had a nonconforming septic system and no replacement septic sites available. The Council just revised the policy to allow sewer service to all developed properties adjacent to sewer, so all of the properties along South Brown Road are now eligible for sewer. Sewer service for a property is voluntary and the residents must request sewer service. All of the costs for providing sewer will be assessed to the benefiting properties. Information on estimated project costs is provided below. Construction of this project is planned for tliis summer. Project Assessments for a Pressure Sewer System with Residential Grinder Pumps This pressure sewer system will consist of individual residential grinder pumps that discharge into a force main located in the street. A service stub with a shut off valve will be installed to the property line. Th. ’’operty owner is then responsible for the connection between the service stub and the house, l . abandoning the existing septic system. The property owners are also responsible for the purchase, installation, operation, and maintenance of their own grinder pump. This pumping system consists of a pump and a tank located in the yard, similar to the pump and tai^ for a mound system. Grinder pumps grind up the solids in the flow versus a mound system pump that pumps clear wastewater, so grinder pumps may require more maintenance and repairs. The estimated assessment is $14,300 per unit payable over a fifteen-year period. There is also an option for the residents to receive an allowance of $4,500 for the purchase of their grinder pump. This grinder pump allowance would then be added to the $14,300 assessment for a total assessment of $18,800. Installation of the grinder pump would be completed by the licensed plumber hired by the property owner to complete the sewer service connection to the house. The assessment amount assumes that in addition to the nine properties in the Fox Ridge neighborhood, three properties along Soutn Brown Road will choose to participate in the project. There is a total of ten eligible properties along South Brown Road. If more properties participate in the project, the assessments will be reduced. If less participate, the assessments will increase. If you choose to participate now, the costs will be assessed over a 15-year period. If you choose to connect to sewer at a later date, you will pay a one-time connection charge equal to the assessment amount, and the cost of the service connection to the property line which is approximately $1,200. The City will install service stubs for all of the South Brown Road properties, and will cover these costs until the property owner pays a connection fee. The connection fee is adjusted annually to cover cost-of-l'ving increases. Options for prepayment of the assessment are available. Based on several projects recently completed, the estimated interest rate is 6.25 %. Based on a 15-year assessment at 6.25 % interest, the annual assessment payments, for a $18,800 assessment, will be approximately $2,000. The property owner is also responsible for payment of a SAC (Sewer Availability Charge) at the time the permit for connection is issued. The 2000 SAC charge will be $1150 per unit. This money is collected by the City and then forwarded to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division. This money is used to pay for the additional capacity built into the MCES sewer interceptor pipes, and treatment plants, for future connections to the sewer system. This is a standard charge for new sewer units for the entire MCES system in the metro area. The year 2000 quarterly sewer rate for the entire City is a flat fee ol lit* ^ Conclusion Receipt of residents comments regarding this proposed project is very important and attendance of this neighborhood meeting is encouraged. In the event you are unable to attend this meeting, please contact us with your comments. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Hft ^ r »—•p*», Sincerely; tregory A. Gappa Director of Public Services Copy: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour and City Council Members Tom Kellog, Bonestroo Engineers A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF MUNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER TO SERVE THE FOX RIDGE AREA WHEREAS, the project area was included in the recent MUSA expansion for sanitary sewer services, a neighborhood informational meeting was held to discuss the project, and project area residents have submitted a letter indicating interest in obtaining sanitary sewer; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has provided preliminary cost estimates for a sanitary sewer extcnsum; however, additional information is needed in order to establish the feasibility of such a project; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that municipal sanitary sewer trunks and/or laterals be constructed to serve the Fox Ridge area and that the benefltted property(s) be assessed for all of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota that the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study, and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective, and feasible and whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 24th day of January, 2000. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk '1 A RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON FOX RIDGE SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No.of the Council adopted January 24, 2000, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer in reference to the Fox Ridge sanitary sewer improvement, and this report was received by the Council on January 24, 2000; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVTD by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: 1. 2. The Council will consider the installation of such sanitaiy' sewer improvement in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $226,000. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 28th day of February, 2000 in the Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, at 7:00 p.m. and the Cl?rk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of January, 2000. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Report For Fox Ridge Sanitary Sewer Orono, Minnesota •* •. January, 2000 FUe No. 1 39-99-106 -.irrr ,i Ai^-n3-arrr->» ^ J Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & |\ \ Associates Engineers & Architects January 18.2000 Bonestroo. Rosene. Arae ” k ^incS Assocunes. inc is c?n Affirmative Action Equ^t Opoortunity ErrpiCser Principjis Otto G Bone.troo. PE • Joseph C Anderlik, PE • Marvin L Sorvj«la. PE • Glenn R Cook. PE • Robert G Schunichi. PE • Jerry A Bourdon. PE • Robert W Rosene. PE . Richard E. Turner, PE and Susan M Eberlm. C PA . Senior Consultants Assocuite PnncipMs Howard A. Sanford, PE. • Keith A Gordon, PE • Robert R. Pfeffcrie. PE • Richard W Foster. PE • David O Loskota. PE • Robert C. Russek. A l A. • Mark A. Hanson. P.£ • Michael r Rautmann. PE • Ted K Field. PE • Kenneth P. Anderson. PE • Mark R. Rolfs. PE. • Sidney P Williamson. PE. L S • Robert F. Kotsmith • Agnes M Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE Offices St. Paul. Rochester. Wilimar and St Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl WeOsite wwwbonestroocom Mr. Greg Gappa Director of Public Services City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323-0066 Re: Fox Ridge Feasibility Report File No. 139-99-106 Dear Greg: As directed by City staff, we have reviewed the existing conditions and the possible installation of sanitary sewer to serve the Fox Ridge neighborhood and several properties north of Fox Ridge. The Fox Ridge neighborhood is located on the east and west sides of South Brown Road just south of the Luce Line trail in Orono. The other propenies are located adjacent to South Brown Road between the Luce Line Trail and Watertown Road. For the purposes of this report there are twelve total properties that would benefit from sanitary sewer. City records indicate that most septic systems in the neighborhood are non-conforming or failing. Designs for both a gravity system and a grinder (pressure) system were considered as shown on Figures 1 and 2. The gravity system would require the installation of a permanent lift station in the Fox Ridge neighborhood. Gravity sewer pipe would be installed in the street and carry flows to the lift station. The three properties located along South Brown Road north of Fox Ridge would need to be served by individual residential grinder pumps. Sanitary sewer services would be extended to the property lines. The grinder system option would require the installation of a common forcemain along the edge of the existing street. Services would be extended to the property lines. Each residence would be served by a residential grinder station that would pump flows into the common forcemain In both the gravity and pressure options, the sewer pipe crossings under C.R. 146 and the Luce Line tral would be jacked or directionally bored. Both systems assume flows would be pumped to an existing gravity manhole at the intersection of Brown Road and Watertown Road in Long Lake. Services would be extended to all frontages along South Brown Road between Fox Ridge and Watertown Road. The following is a summary of the estimated costs for each option: Area # of Units Est. Project Cost Est. Cost / Unit Fox Ridge-Grinder 12 $226,(X)0 $18,800 Fox Ridee-Gravity 12 $378,000 n $31,500 The gravity sewer option would require that the sewer be installed in the roadway and therefore complete street reconstruction will be required. Street reconstruction costs have been included in the gravity sewer estimate shown above. The grinder option assumes that the forcemain would be directionally bored along the edge of the roadways and therefore street repairs would be necessary only at manhole locations. 2335 West Highway 36 - St. Paul. MN 55113 • 651'636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1311 The estimated costs are based on 1999 unit prices and can be related to the ENR Construction Cost Index for January, 2000 of 6,130. Soil investigation work has not been completed and the estimated costs are based on typical Orono soils. The project would require a license agreement between the City and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR) to cross the Luce Line trail. Permits will be required from Hennepin County and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The City of Long Lake will need to approve the connection to their system. The construction of the sanitary sewer to serve the Fox Ridge neighborhood is feasible from an engineering standpoint. The project is necessary because of the non-conforming septic systems and potential pollution problems. The capital cost as well as operation and maintenance costs have been considered in determining that the project is cost effective. The cost of these improvements are interrelated and should be assigned equitably between all property owners. The following recommendations are presented for consideration by the Orono City Council: 1. 2. 3. That this Report be adopted as the guide for installation of sanitary sewer to serve the Fox Ridge neighborhood and certain properties along South Brown Road between the Luce Line Trail and Watertown Road. That the City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the proposed project prior to the public hearing. That a public hearing be held on the proposed improvements. The total estimated project cost of $226,000 should be incorporated in the public notice. The total estimated cost of $226,000 for the grinder system includes a 5 percent contingency, a 20 percent allowance for design, inspection, legal, and administration costs, and a 5 percent allowance for capitalized interest and bonding costs during construction. The cost estimate does not include easement costs that could be incurred on the project. The installation, operation and maintenance of the grinder stations and the connection of the sewer between the property line and the home will be the responsibility of the property owners. Detailed cost estimates for both options are attached for your review. We would be pleased to discuss this report further with the City Council or City staff at any mutually convenient time. Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Thomas P. Kellogg, P.E. Date: January 18.2000 Reg. No. 26917 FOX RIDGE SANITARY SEWER - GRAVITY OPTION PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ITEM 8* PVC sanitary sewer Jack 8" PVC sewer, incl. Casing Directional bore 4" HOPE forcemain Standard 4* dia. MH MH overdepth 8* X 4* wye 4 “ PVC service pipe Directional bore 1 1/2" HDPE service pipe Improved pipe foundation Televise sewer Mechanical trench compaction Submersible pump lift station Connect to existing manhole Meter manhole Mobilization Silt fence Bituminous surface removal Common excavation Geotextile fabric Class 5 aggregate base. 100% crushed Type 31 bituminous base course Type 41 bituminous wear course Bituminous material for tack coat Repair driveways Sod with 4* topsoil Seeding w/topsoil, mulch, and fertilizer UNIT EST.EST. INIT PRICE QUANTITY COST LF 28.00 625 SI 7.500 LF 200.00 75 LF 22.00 2,300 50,600 EA 1,500.00 5 7,500 LF 100.00 10 1,000 EA 75.00 9 675 LF 20.00 270 5,400 LF 20.00 200 4,000 LF 1.00 1,075 1,075 LF 1.00 700 700 LF 1.00 893 895 EA 75,000.00 1 75,000 EA 2,000.00 1 EA 5.000.00 1 5,000 LS 5.000.00 1 LF 2.50 1,600 4,000 SY 2.00 2,600 5,200 CY 6.00 1,000 6,000 SY 1.50 2,600 3,900 TN 10.00 1,600 16,000 TN 32.00 315 10,080 TN 35.00 235 8,225 GL 1.50 150 225 EA 750.00 9 6,750 SY 2.50 2,350 5,875 AC 3,000.00 0.3 900 Estimated Construction Cost •t-5% Contingencies +20% Legal, Engineering and Administration Residential grinder station Long Lake connection charge EA EA 4.500.00 1.700.00 +5% Capitalized Interest and Bonding Total Eatimated Cost 3 12 S258.500 12,925 S271.425 54,285 S325.710 13,500 20,400 359,610 17,981 377,591 FOX RIDGE SANITARY SEWER • RESIDENTIAL GRINDER OPTION PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ___________ ITEM UNIT UNIT EST. PRICE QUANTITY 11/2* HOPE service pipe 1 1/2" HOPE service pipe*directional bore 2* HOPE forcemain-directional bore HOPE service tee Curb stop Cleanout manhole Repair driveways Bituminous street patching Connect to existing manhole Erosion control fence Mobilization Sod with 4* topsoil Seeding wAopsoil. mulch, and fertilizer Meter manhole LF LF LF EA EA EA EA SY EA LF LS SY AC EA 10.00 20,00 20.00 50.00 200.00 2,500.00 750.00 10.00 2,000.00 2.50 5,000.00 2.50 3.000. 00 5.000. 00 200 460 2,950 12 12 6 3 200 1 300 1 2,200 0.3 1 Estimated Constmction Cost •f5% Contingencies -t-20% Legal, Engineering and Administration Residential grinder station Long Lake connection charge EA EA •t-5% Capitalized Interest and Bonding Total Estimated Cost 4.500.00 1.700.00 12 12 EST. COST $2,000 9,200 59.000 600 2,400 15.000 2,250 2,000 2,000 750 5,000 5,500 900 5,000 $111,600 5,580 $117,180 23,436 $140,616 54,000 20,400 215,016 10,751 225,767 CoijNr.n. ^«^=ETl^lQ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JAN 2 4 2000 DATE: January 24, 2000 CllY UhOHOiVU ITEM NO Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: ^4 Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Request for Final Payment Navarre Well Maintenance and Pump Repairs We have reviewed the information submitted by the City's engineering firm and recommend approval of this Request for Final Payment. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Final Payment, Navarre Well #1 Maintenance and Pump Repairs Project to Alberg Water Services Inc. in the amount of $20,571.80 i —^r>i•mara-—I*I ‘ Z. A. - • ■- ~ 1/1 Bonestroo ^ij^Rosene Anderiik& |\]| Associates In9in«tri & Architects Owner. Citv of Orono. PO Box 66. Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Date: December 17.1999 For Period:November 10.1999 to December 22.1999 Request No: 2 & Finai Contractor Alberg Water Services. 16200 Hwy 10 NW. Elk River. MN 55330-7825 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT Well No. 1 Maintenance and Pump Repairs BRA File No. 139-99-108 SUMMARY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Original Contract Amount Change Order - Addition Change Order • Deduction Revised Contract Amount Value Completed to Date Malarial on Hand Amount Earned Less Retainage 0% Subtotal Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $29.765.00 $ $ 2 & Final 5 5 5 $ $ $ $ $ 29,765.00 27.655.00 0.00 27.655.00 0.00 27.655.00 7.083.20 20.571.80 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Approved by Owner: CITY OF ORONO Specified Contract Completion Date: November 19.1999 Date: r«qu«tt2 Contract U.nit Quantity Amount lo. Item Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date 1 Mobilization: pump removal and reinstallation LS 1 $3,500.00 1 $3,500.00 2 Televise well EA 2 $1,000.00 2 $2,000.00 3 Wire brush casing with well drilling rig LS 1 $1,780.00 $0.00 4 F & 1 jetting and air lifting equipment LS 1 $3,280.00 1 $3,280.00 5 Water jetting / air lifting HR 40 $135.00 38 $5,130.00 6 Superchlorinate well LS 1 $675.00 1 $675.00 7 Rebuild packing box LS 1 $100.00 1 $100.00 8 F & 1 ss. Headshaft LS 1 $200.00 1 $200.00 9 F & 1 complete set of bowl bearings LS 1 $165.00 $0.00 10 F & 1 new ss bowl shaft Machine bowl & impeller & install bronze wear LS 1 $320.00 $0.00 11 ring, per stage EA 4 $150.00 $0.00 12 Trim impeller to reduce capacity EA 4 $25 00 $0.00 13 8" X10' sch. 40 tail pipe LS 1 $160.00 1 $150.00 14 270* X 1/2- id PVC dip line tube EA 2 $100.00 2 $200.00 15 8" X 10* sch. 40 column pipe EA 15 $230.00 10 $2,300.00 16 8 ” X 5' sch. 40 column pipe EA 1 $170.00 1 $170.00 17 Column coupling EA 16 $30.00 11 $330.00 18 1 1/2" X 10' ss line shaft EA 15 $175.00 $0.00 19 1 1/2" X 5'ss line shaft EA 1 $135.00 $0.00 20 Ss shaft coupling EA 2 $55.00 26 $1,430.00 21 rubber bearing EA 27 $15.00 24 $360.00 22 Bronze bearing retainer EA 27 $30.00 24 $720.00 23 Motor inspection, testing, and cleaning 24 Complete motor bearing replacement, if LS 1 $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 necessary 25 Shop time for sandblasting and inspecting pump LS 1 $500.00 1 $500.00 components 26 Field time for venting the outer casing, if HR 20 $40.00 20 $800.00 necessary HR 20 $40.00 20 $800.00 27 Altem ite No. 1, F & 1 new bowl assembly TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE LS 1 $4,000 1 $4,000.00 $27,655.00 rtqucst 2 I PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF ORONO 0 BRA File No. 139-99-108 CONTRACTOR ALBERG WATER SERVICES CHANGE ORDERS No.Date Description Amount Total Change Orders $0.00 PAYMENT SUMMARY 1 ^ wo 1 Start 11/10/99 7,083.20 372.80 7,456.00 2 11/10/y»12/22/99 20.571.80 0.00 27,655.00 Material on Hand $0.00 Total Payment to Date $27,655.00 Original Contract $29,765.00 Retainage Pay No. 2 & Final 0.00 Change Orders $0.00 Total /Vnount Earned $27,655.00 Revised Contract $29,765.00 ( r«quttt2 COUNCIL MEETING JAN 2 4 2000 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OHOivu Date: January 12,2000 aItem No: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: Gary Cheswick Chief of Police Item Description: Hiring of Full-Time Police Record Specialist Exhibits:None DISCUSSION The position for a police record specialist has become available with Kris Knollenberg leaving. Stacie Budig, who has been working for the Hennepin County Attorney's Office as a records clerk, was chosen as the top applicant from a field of 25 people. Based upon Stacie's interest in the position and her qualifications, I am recommending Ms. Budig be hired as a full time records specialist for the police department. COUNCIL ACTION RF.OlJESTED Request Stacie Budig be hired as a police record specialist with a salary rate of $13.03 per hour, plus benefits, effective January 31,2000. 1 I - r . r • ^ - ■ r • . . • - cm iMciL meeting REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JAN 2 4 2000 DATE: January 21,2000 Cl 1Y OH OHOMO ITEM NO: / D Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Affordable Housing Grant Application Related to the Lake Minnetonka Woods Townhomes - Resolution The Minnetonka Woods townhouse development is providing housing units at a cost that is relatively close to the Metropolitan Council’s affordability level. During the tour of the City with Metropolitan Council staff and Met Council member Mary Hill Smith, the Met Council staff suggested the City apply for grants to buy down the cost of several of the townhomes to the affordable level. One source of these grants is the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, which has a grant application deadline of February 11. The grant application requires a Council resolution indicating the iiousing to be assisted with the grant is consistent with the housing element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. A resolution is attached for Council consideration. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution indicating the Minnetonka Woods townhouse development is consistent with the housing element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and authorizing the City Administrator to submit appropriate grant applications to enable a number of the townhomes to meet the Met Council’s affordability guidelines. A RESOLUTION TO VERIFY THAT THE LAKE MINNETONKA WOODS TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the housing element of the City ’s Comprehensive Plan includes a set of housing improvement goals; and WHEREAS, one of the housing improvement goals is to provide opportunities for a mix of housing types, locations, and cost ranges, which will meet the needs and provide adequate housing for all age and family groups; and WHEREAS, the housing element of the City ’s Comprehensive Plan includes a housing improvement plan, which is a set of implementation policies designed to achieve the housing goals; and WHEREAS, one of the housing improvement policies is to encourage developers to provide a variety of housing types and cost ranges; and WHEREAS, the Minnetonka Woods townhouse development includes 29 moderately priced townhouse units; and WHEREAS, a relatively small grant would enable a number of these units to meet the Metropolitan Council ’s housing affordability guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Orono City Council does hereby verify that the Lake Minnetonka Woods townhouse development is consistent with the housing element of the City ’s Comprehensive Plan; and does also hereby authorize the City Administrator to submit gia'U applications appropriate to enabling a number of the units in the townhouse development to meet the Metropolitan Council's housing affordability guidelines. Adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on January* 24,2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mavor Page 1 of 1 coi INCIL MEETING JAN 2 4 2000 Cl IV OH ohonu REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January 21,2000 IIITEiM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:\genda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Scheduling of Upcoming Work Sessions There are a number of topics, mostly related to the update of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, to be discussed in Council work sessions. These include finalizing the City's surface water management plan, the City’s septic policy, a trunk sewer plan, the parks, trails and open space plan, and transportation policies, if that discussion is not completed at the January 24 work session. In addition, the Council should meet to clarify goals for 2000 and to further discuss the roles of the City Administrator, the Mayor and the City Council, particularly in relation to efforts in support of the City’s interests on an intergovernmental level. These topics will require several work sessions. We need to select dates and times for these work sessions. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to establish dates and times for upcoming work sessions. CniiMrii meeting REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JAN 2 4 2000 i/I I T DATE; January 21,2000 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Scheduling of Joint Meeting with the Long Lake City Council Council The Long Lake/Orono Consolidation Study Committee has completed its review of four of the six issue areas the Committee identified for study. The Committee is planning to hold two public meetings on February 29 and March 2 to provide an interim report on the Committee’s progress. The Committee will present its key findings regarding the four issue areas. The Committee would like to present this information to the City Councils prior to the public meetings. The Committee is proposing to do this at a joint meeting of the City Councils to be held on Tuesday, February 22. This meeting could be held at 5:30 p.m. or 7:00 p.m., whichever time works best for the City Councils. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to select a date and time for a joint meeting of the Long Lake and Orono City Councils. ---------------------------4-. iwniL MEETING JAN 2 4 2000 on Y uh OHOAjy REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January 20,2000 ITEM NO: /3 Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Administrator Reviewed: Title City Clerk Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval Agenda Section: Licenses SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT 1.Applicant: Event: Location: Date: Time: Charles Cudd Company Spring Preview of Homes 100 Crystal Creek Road February 26 - March 19,2000 Noon - 7:00 p.m., Thursday - Sunday RESIDENTIAL KENNEL LICENSE 1. Wayne E. and Gayle D. Carrier 1376 North Arm Drive 2. Kenneth B. and Karen S. Rolland 4119 Oak Street ? CIGARETTE LICENSE 1.Richard Bloomquist 7. John O’Sullivan Rick’s Super Valu O’Sullivans I (Convenience Store) 3333 Shoreline Drive 2420 Shadywood Road 2.Steven Corl 8. John O’Sullivan Navarre Liquors, Inc.O'Sullivans II (Convenience Store-Culvers) 3421 Shoreline Drive 3340 Shoreline Drive 3.Kenneth Galloway 9. Don Scherven Wayzata Country Club Navarre Lanes 200 Wavzata Boulevard 3435 Shoreline Drive 4.Timothy Ivory 10. William Wear Spring Hill Golf Club 12-Hi Liquor, Inc. 725 Sixth Avenue North 2160 W. Wayzata Boulevard 5.LeRoy Koehnen 11. Grant Wenkstem Navarre Amoco Lakeview' Golf of Orono, Inc. 3360 Shoreline Drive 405 North Arm Drive 6.1 roy Krahenbuhl Western Convenience 2160 Wayzata Boulevard COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Permit #: Fee: S50.00 Date Received: Phone Number: ^ Name: Address:^75" 5/TS City, State, Zip:.m/ 3 Location of Parade or Event: Date ofEvent: ^Hou^s ofEvent: y.'COr^l SOaJ ) Insurance Company:_Amount: (Copy of insurance certijicai?^ on which the Cityp its agents and employees are named as additional insured, must be submitted with this application.) I am aware of all applicable Stite and other laws regarding parades and special events and will abide by same. I aiso agree to hold the City of Orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the parade of special event approved by the granting of this permit. J^ui^erstand required for4,1 events may require off-duty or reserve officers and a fee may be lervices. .7 Signature Date Approved: D Denied: D By:. Remarks: Date:January 19,2000 To:Lin Vee, City Clerk From: Gary Cheswick, Chief of Policeyi^^^^ Subject: Special Event Permit I have reviewed the application of the Charles Cudd Company to hold a" Spring Preview” event on February 26 through March 19,2000, at the location of 100 Crystal Creek Road. I have no objection to the issuance of this permit providing the following conditions are met: ► No parking will be allowed on Watertown Road. The builder is responsible for the actual posting of temporary No Parking signs on Watertown Road, east and west of the intersection with Crystal Creek Road. The builder must maintain traffic flow through the immediate residential area and intersection. . J Owner. KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1,19 ___to December 31,19 ' V av -'ct- /F . C • Property Address: / ? 7" N. A R /> > FFf? ; i/ (T ^ u a -/? . P/is • S3 (include city and rip) Mailing Address (if different): (wofl^Phone: fhome^-4.^ ) V7/- RESIDENTLAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) Ma.ximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: / (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: //'7~>^. Purpose for more than 2 does: I ^ / lov 'i5 5_______________ Dogs normally kept: inside ___^kennel structure COMMERCLAL Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:___________________________ Business Activities:___ Normal Business Hours:____ After Hours Contact: (name)_ (phone) Do? runs/exercise areas are: (example: boarding, breedmg, veterinary care, retail, etc.) inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only an does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises pnor to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigne agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any specia conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. C- ■ 2 6 . ■L Applicahif Date Recommends Approva l V Denia l^ Date KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective Januaiy 1,to December kT Qittrri- © I . •. • Owner:G> ^ 'rPyx 3 ^ »wrt* Property Address: Mi(<R St'Croy\.c ^ ^SSSi-^ZZ^( Mailing Address Of difierent):__ Phone; (homel 1 b 2. (include city and zip) SA^/V\T V______________ (work) RESIDENTLAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:, (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed:_____L^io _ M Purpose for more than 2 dogs:Pefo Dogs normally kept: inside____kennel structure COMNIERCL^L Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:_______________ Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name). (phone). Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono Cuy Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is peimissi>^ only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation' the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the Ucense duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any speci conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license- approval. f I Applicant Date For City Use Only Kennd inspected by 54 >Date '/T) Recommends Approval Denial [\l}i NH APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 11/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) 1. Applicant ’s Full Name DATE FIRST 31 IDDLE on tz 2.Applicant's Home Addre^ A 'D Mr HOUSEJ 619-4*7*^ ^zrL HOUS&NUMBER^STREET HOME PHONE CITY ^/l) ^C3T9 *710 fSTATE 3. Applicant's Businesess£kpe BUSINESS PHONEjyEE OF. BUSINESS * j i BUSINt&b t'nunt ^ ^ BUsiNESsTlAME V STREET ADDRESS /BUSINESS NAME ?./). /3il ^ MAILING ADDRESS 4. ■ CITY ZIP Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacc(^elated device between the customer and th^icensee^r^mp|pyee takes I HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT 'T&%HE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY Date The issuance of a licence under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absohzte right of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 121197 3 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ••n nyr r.iCY O'r Or.^ 1. FEE: $100.00 (February 1 -January 31) Applicant's Full Name soe—v-3 _____^ V i T \ 2. FIRST middle Applicant's Home Address A Y j ^\.VC»<S LAST HOUSE NUMBER 3. 4. CITY STATE STREET HOME PHONE Applicant's Business TYPE OF BUSINESS BUSINESS NAME BUSINESS PHONE STREET ADDRESS TYPE OF BUSINESS ' v BU&iweao rnunc ^ V-A Q VO m3—' ^ z> Vs v»oi^ -------—- STREET ADDRESS --------------- ----------N rirv zipMAILING ADDRESS Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the custonier and the licensee or er^loyee takes place. Kx^ yl >a3^__------------------------------------ / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY \6^ O^te The issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the applicant attd shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 1211973 1. 3. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31)oo DATE Applicant's Full Name FIRST MIDDLE LAST 2. Applicant's Home Address /<.r/ HOUSE NUMBER iiftTYf /akf____ E J M • STREET HOME PHONE S^T//0 CITY STATE ZIP Applicant's Business (^OU/OTiCY C^I^S TYPE OF BUSINESS Cc-t* ^ BUSINESS PHONE BUSINESS NAME STREET ADDRESS /joy /St_________/a y^iAtA S'SJJI_ ZIP MAILING ADDRESS Describe how the actual physicarexchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes \ HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE PRODUCTS. OR-TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES THPC/TY TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. Date 7 / The issuance of a license under this erd,nance shall be considered a pnvi/epe right of the applicant end shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 121197 3 L___asm APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series • Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 1. 2. 3. 4. FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) i^plicant’s Full Name FIRST ’ Applicant's Home Address DATE MIDDLE LAST f- HOUSE NUMBER STREET HOME PHONE err/or CITY STATE ZIP Applicant's Business ^tiiVATC fliuL - /Soo TYPE OF BUSINESS U;ll Clug BUSINESS PHONE (lA (» BUSINESS NAME U (d MAii iNn AnnRPss STREET ADDRESS / CITY S'S'3‘}l ZIP Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place. trx. — ^ ^ ________ I HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. l-C-oo Signature Date The issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 121197 3 1. 2. 3. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 12/Q8/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono 0i.« Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) DATE Applicant's Full Name 32 MIDDLE LAST Applicant's Home Address _______da *7.^ HOUSE NUMBER STREET KAlV ^ HOME PHONE CITY STATE Applicant's Business S Sr<4-TiV»j TYPE OF BUSINESS BUSINESS PHONE A/'At/ BUSINESS NAME 33 Uo S A.//V 6. STREET ADDRESS m »v ___ CITYMAILING ADDRESS Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between die customer and the licensee or employee takes place. ________________________________________- / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT Oats The issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of Vie applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 121197 3 2. 3. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1 -January 31)j. DATE 1. Applicant's Full NameIVPPIIC 1^ MIDDLEFIRST Applicant's Home Address ^ Q\Q/0 ICC kii iMDCD / STREET LAST HOUSE NUMBER Lbk>6- /.A/Cdr' HOME PHONE CITY STATE Applicant's Business 'CY7p TYPE OF BUSINESS BUSINESS PHONE /?4^ BUSINESS NAME STREET ADDRESS / CITY ZIPMAILING ADDRESS Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employe^takes place. ^ -------- f/^. F/lo^ / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUck ORTOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJE^ ir- oTTA-rr- MJthtKtCOr^TA AKIH TL/P DQHINANCPS OF THF CITY Date T7 j « issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a prwilege arid not an absolute right of the applicant and shaU not entitle the holder to an automaUc renewal or the ucense. 121197 3 L 1. 2. 3. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordiaance No. 1<4, Second Series • Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31)/ / /3 loD DATE Applicant's Full Name S(A UL I FIRST MIDDLE LAST Applicant's Home Address . OUSE NUMBER * STREET k(2--<^Zo -S'3‘5 9 HOME PHONE CITY STATE Applicant's Business d,Q tO OCfJ ^^ f t/7/ TYPE OF BUSINESS 0 'Su LU BUSINESS PHONE /I P^TAnDRESS 6BUSINESS NAME (j 0 ^'OY ^3 STREET ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS CITY Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or ^ployee takes place. ni( OAJi (ru^ ---- f axjP^ I HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO, TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR-TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. {1,3 fz.oc!> Date The issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege e^ not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 12119/3 1. 2. 3. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES pi (OrdiuDcc No. IM, Second Series • Adopted 12/08/97) (iXt Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) DATE / / /3 [oD Applicant's Full Name __ “ToffAJ /!A (cHAiiL-d'S M l.L.\ FIRST MIDDLE LAST Applicant's Home Address OUSE.NUMBER ^ STREET //rtZ HOME PHONE CITY STATE Applicant's Business CLok) OChJ V7/ -?3 7S' TYPE OF BUSINESS 0 'SiA LU BUSINESS PHONE 33V6 Sh ':.n BUSINESS NAME STREET ADDRESS ^ 0 ^'oy' ^3 ^s —. MAILING ADDRESS CITY Describe how the actuai physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related^device between the cust9mer and^thp licensee or employee takes iiww ulo av &u€ii |jiiysM^€ii VAwiiciiiyt? mi uiv wuau tobacco related device between the customer and the lice place. nU Oajl «r; /l£yCjLyv:^it/^ I HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO, TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR-TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. i If 3 t’1/31 Zc^C> SignaturiV Date 77ia issuance of a Bcanse under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege end not an absolute right ofOte eppBcertt and shall not entitta the holder to an automatie renewal of the Ocanse. i2ii»r.3 k Sak .imtmJX £ J. ^rwni] - *• *m • ^APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address; P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 1. 2. 4. FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) Applicant ’s Full Name FIRST MIDDLE Applicant's Home ^dre HOUSE number yO '/I STRECT CITY STATE 3. Applicant's Business TYPE05 BUSINESSKCjyC DUOIIMCOO 'A BUSINESS NAME MAILING ADDRESS /_-M DATE LAST HOME PHONE ZIP 3 T)r STREET ADDRESS CITY ZIP Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related d^e between tlw customer and the licensee or employee takes place. —'____________________ ■—’ / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL PRODUCTS. OR-TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAW&Of THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OFORONO ' ' /^ / 0 - Signatute Date T/»e issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not enbVe the holder to an automatic renewal of the ucense. 121197 3 VSi;' W?fij -^1 rs«oj APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SF.T ,T ■ TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordtoance No. 164, Second Series • Adopted 12/08/97) • . • I tf .Make check payable to: City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay* MN 55323 Gi • - Mailing address: FEE: $100.00 (February 1 -January 31) 1. Applicant's Full Name iAiiLLmrn _________ 2. FIRST MIDDLE Applicant's Home Address "?> C, !4ac K herr^ /4-t' / / HOUSE NUMBER O SISTREET Latio Lc/K<t._____/y)f\_____ CITY (7 STATE Z\P Jd. ^dod lATE UJ<^<7K LAST ^73- (/a3S HOME PHONE 3. 4. Applicant's Business s^z/e. L/auof^ S-torc TYPE OF BUSINESS /3'/// Liauofi. .J:nc. BUSINESS NAME Pjj MAIUNCHING ADDRESS /../a - at/ BUSINESS PHONE 5/^(? ^D. uygU-Lo-Z-ff 6-LOP STREET ADDRESS ^ Lon^ Lej)<^ rr\h CITY C7 ZIP Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place.(^.C—C I ^Tf ----- P.'qmX tor n^Uj-her/ Oto’dtfhi' , —h<?h{l\d.------ ' '' ------------------------------------------------------------------------- / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. Signature s 10. The issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the eppOcent and shall rn)t entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 1211973 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SF.f T. TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, iVIN 55323 1. 2. 3. FEE; $100.00 (February 1-January 31)/-//) --3,000 DATE Applicant's Full Name *R usi olL FIRST MIDDLE LAST Applicant's Home Address '710 /O. Ch) • HOUSE NUMBER IPOdUoxA STREET riOME PHONE CITY STATE Applicanfs Business (on / Cod rS^ (6 TYPE OF BUSINESS LoKlOie.(j^ oo/-f- A UrOfO.^^- BUSINESS NAME Y 7\ ~llO .SKorc- O'** W . (y\cuncX . BUSINESS PHONE STREET ADDRESS ■<r.rJ6*/ CITY T MAILING ADDRESS Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the license or employee takes place. CcLcfpWgr >h ^ I HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL ^^SACCa TO^CCO PRODUCTS, OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SU^E(^ TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. /-/C)-00 Date The issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered e privilege and not an absolute right of the appSeant and shall not entitle the holder to en automatic renewal of the license. 1211973 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Note: Amended by adding Special Event Permit for Orono PTO DATE: January 20,2000 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Title City Clerk _____ Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Licenses Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT 1. Applicant: Charles Cudd Company Event: Spring Preview of Homes Location: 100 Crystal Creek Road Date: February 26 - March 19,2000 2. Applicant: Orono PTO Event: Annual Winter Fun Fest Location: Orono High School Date: Saturday, February 5,2000 Time: Noon - 7:00 p.m., Thursday-Sunday Tiisve: 9:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. RESIDENTIAL KENNEL LICENSE 1 . Wayne E. and Gayle D. Carrier 1376 North Arm Drive 2. Kenneth B. and Karen S, Rolland 4119 Oak Street CIGARETTE LICENSE 1. Richard Bloomquist Rick's Super Valu 3333 Shoreline Drive 2. Steven Corl Navarre Liquors, Inc. 3421 Shoreline Drive 3. Kenneth Galloway Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzata Boulevard 4. Timothy Ivory Spring Hill Golf Club 725 Sixth Avenue North 5. LeRoy Koehnen Navarre Amoco 3360 Shoreline Drive 7. John O'Sullivan O'Sullivans 1 (Convenience Store) 2420 Shadywood Road 8. John O'Sullivan O'Sullivans II (Convenience Store-Culvers) 3340 Shoreline Drive 9. Don Scherven Navarre Lanes 3435 Shoreline Drive 10. William Wear 12-Hi Liquor, Inc. 2160 W. Wayzata Boulevard 11. Grant Wenkstem Lakeview Golf of Orono, Inc. 405 North Arm Drive 6. Troy Krahenbuhl Western Convenience ?. 160 Wayzata Boulevard COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. 1 Date:January 24,2000 To:Lin Vee, City Clerk From:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Subject:Special Event Application i I have reviewed the application submitted by Mr. Patrick Bacon on behalf of the Orono Elementary PTO to hole' the Winter Funfest Carnival. I have no objection to the issuance of this permit. No special restrictions are needed. v9! PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Permit #: Fee: S50.00 Date Received: Phone Number: ^^*'7 Name: Chh^2l^, ■ Address:7-16' S~- Su>_r^¥^ City, State, Zip:/IiPl.6 /?U’ 3 ■r Location of Parade or Event:(2/7 Date of Event: ^ Houi^s of Event: MCA7* 7V ^;cc :^ Type of Event: ^) Insurance Company:.Amount: (Copy of insurance certijicatep on which the City, its agents and employees are named as additional insured, must be submitted with this application.)1 I am aware of all applicable Stite and other laws regarding parades and special events and will abide by same. 1 aiso agree to hold the City of Orono harmless from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the parade of special event approved by the granting of this permit. (ti I S’events may require off-duty or reserve officers and a fee may be ervices. L^, Signature /////zap£> t '^ate Approved: D Denied: D By:.' Remarks: Date: To: January 19,2000 Lin Vee, City Clerk From: Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Subject: Special Event Permit I have reviewed the application of the Charles Cudd Company to hold a"Spring Preview" event on February 26 through March 19,2000, at the location of 100 Crystal Creek Road. I have no objection to the issuance of this permit providing the following conditions are met: ► No parking will be allowed on Watertown Road. The builder is responsible for the actual posting of temporary No Parking signs on Watertown Road, east and west of the intersection with Crystal Creek Road. The builder must maintain traffic flow through the immediate residential area and intersection. J KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1,19___to December 31,19 Owner: Id^A Property Address: V /m ts-/i .0 (wori^ Mailing Address (if different):______ Phone; fhome]^-/>-:^ ) </7/ - <:> O RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) Ma^mum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: / (over 6 months of age) ^ ^ * ------ Principal Breed: / c/^- /V. /t*/?/>-> (./. /^/4» ♦ <5~ (include city and zip) s Purpose for more than 2 does: Lc:vi5_____ Dogs normally kept: inside ___^kennel structure COMMERCLAL Kennel License Fee; S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:___________________________ 7>oC~ 5 Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours;____ After Hours Contact: (name)_ (phone)_ Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. / C / Applicant /. Date fgr Qtv Ufe Only. ^ /) V Kennel inspected by Recommends Approva l V De'niaK Date KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Eflfective January 1,^OO to December 31,^^ dhat^o / 0' /1^'.- Owner: k/>,v\n,-('U f Kf3rC/>'\ S Muct »•.* » 1 ' Property Address:.St 0 f(M r: bS5S(:-^ZZ^( Mailing Address (if different);_ Phone; (home)__Jil!£_i£ilIl!l (include city and zip) S(X yy 'JL^___________ (work). RESIDENTLAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) MajdmumNo. of dogs to be kept at one time:, (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed:_____KVlos. 4 Purpose for more than 2 dogs: Dogs normally kept: inside____kennel structure COMMERCL^L Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business :________________ Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name). (phone). Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City pennisssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. Applicant Date For City Use Only Kennel inspected by 5-^r Date '/T) Recommends Approva l y' Denial \ m APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1 -January 31)/- /i - DATE 1. Applicant's Full Name * FIRST IDDLE LAST Applicant's Home Addre^/j My 92^ HOUS&NUMB^^ J STREETHOUS&NUMBER^ J s>iKtti CITY / STATE ZIP^ HOME PHONE 3. Applicant's Business OI leiSJCCC I PP OF. BUSINESS • t i /.Ia,-</"?/ BUSINESS PHON BUSINESS NAME ^.0. /A I 3 •Hor^ STREET ADDRESS / iO/L MAILING ADDRESS CITY ZIP 4.Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacc(^elated device between the customer and th^icense^or^m^yee lace. I HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO, TOBACCO PRODUCTS, OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT ----E LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY ONO. Date The issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute hght of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 121197 3 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono 'ii n7r Gift OirUnC.Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) 1.Applicant's Full NameApp 2. FIRST MIDDLE Applicant's Home Address A 1 LAST HOUSE NUMBER STREET HOME PHONE CITY STATE 3.Applicant's Business TVDP OP Rl I5%INF5;S > C L TYPE OF BUSINESS ^ v BUSINESS PHONE BUSINESS NAME BUSINESS PHONE STREET ADDRESS \K\ V^V^KH\?iVv. Q-OOVioVv) M^ING ADDRESS CITY 4.Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the custorner and the licensee or eirmloyee takes Place. Kx^ ______ . WASiA W _ / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS, OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY The issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 1211973 1. 2. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164| Second Scries • Adopted 12/W/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) DATE Applicant's Full Name £'L0uJA Y FIRST Applicant's Home Address Q{< • MIDDLE LAST HOUSE NUMBER CITY STREET HOME PHONE sr//o STATE 3. Applicant's Business s77C TYPE OF BUSINESS AJ/* y^/hrA Phu/Or<y BUSINESS PHONE Ay. BUSINESS NAME /i'oy /Sf STREET ADDRESS U JA sysj/ MAILING ADDRESS CITY ZIP Describe how the actual physical 'exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place. /3 A 70 t7eiA>€6f<S_____________________ / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO, TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CRONO. Date / f The issusnce of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 121107 3 ai ii Ill .-ao-c **^ .k . « 1. 2. 3. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164t Second Series - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to; City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1 -January 31)/■” (p “ O O DATE i^plicant's Full Name / i FIRST MIDDLE LAST Applicant’s Home Address ^10 OAK HOUSE NUMBER li. Li STREET HOME PHONE CITY STATE Applicant's Business Q/J- /Soo TYPE OF BUSINESS , . ^ HiU ^1^ CLg BUSINESS NAME BUSINESS PHONE 7o?.T KEETADDRESS / fiA C, MAILING ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS Of^AlO CITY Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the ^stomer and the licensee or employee takes place. rrx.lacg. ind/ttt. / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. /-C~oo Date Th9 issuonce of 8 license under this ordinance shall be considered a pmilege and not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 121197 3 01 • • • '•••-> I APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No, 164, Second Scries - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 1. 2. FEE: $100.00 (February 1 -January 31) DATE Applicant's Full Name — 32 MIDDLE LAST Applicant's Home Address Clif »2.<^ HbUSE NUMBHOUSE NUMBER hAntA iaJ STREET hA»V S30^ HOME PHONE CITY STATE BUSINESS PHONE 3. Applicant's Business s 1 C Ifm____S T~<4T iVkJ______ TYPE OF BUSINESS BUSINESS NAME 33 1^0 *> d.__________ MAILING ADDRESS 4. Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place. c --------------------------------------------------------------------- STREET ADDRESS #vuV ___ CITY I HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS, OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT Date The issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 121197 3 2. 3. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (Februaiy 1-January 31) DATE 1. Applicant's Full Name»\PP»c FIRST 1-MIDDLE ^ LAST Applicant's Home Address ^ 0l2o LJau IQC Kll IMRPR /HOUSE NUMBER STREET HOME PHONE CITY STATE Applicant's Business r- ^ roe.t^'^W<- 'OYlP TYPE OF BUSINESS BUSINESS NAME BUSINESS PHONE ^ :2M O Lj STREETADDRESS/ MAILING ADDRESS CITY ZIP Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes Place. -------- /f/iC P'olf- “X-Q fi^dTU-^n Cok»<J76^f^ -------------- f!/%. T‘U6’^ ._$>?/<■'-f ^ I HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR-TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT Date The issuence of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the applicant and shall rwt entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 1211973 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Series - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 1. FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31)/ / /3 oD Applicant's Full Name DATE J 2. 3. 4. FIRST MIDDLE LAST Vpplicant's Home fjrWc iUSE NUMBER' 'HOME PHONE /Hcl/ CITY STATE Applicant's Business oe/j (*r/0CL' TYPE OF BUSINESS (0 LH _________ BUSINESS NAME ^ 0 ^3 MAILING ADDRESS C/7/ BUSINESS PHONE STREET ADDRESSiss 6 i~.T3q CITY Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place. nt( OAJL -------- f / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR‘TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. (/,3 fz-OoZ) Date The Isst/ence of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the ttcense. 121197 3 1. 3. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICESmm. /It (Ordinance No. 164, Second Scries - Adopted 12/08/97) Madce check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31)I 113 loD DATE Applicant's Full Name O's ^L.L\ FIRST MIDDLE LAST 2. Applicant's Home Address gW7 HOUSE NUMBER s Home Address Jk£L££M(r_JM. ITY STATE STREET HOME PHONE Applicant's Business C qa ; rerA^^Cr" TYPE OF BUSINESS (0 'Su LH BUSINESS PHONE 53V6 Sz-'-/)'•f.-o;' t- J.' /U-’ BUSINESS NAME STREET ADDRESS (/ 0 ^3 MAILING ADDRESS CITY Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place. / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR-TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. f If2> / Signatur 1/3 f Zc'V-O Date The issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege arxi not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 121197 3 I • M..* ■HIM! Tiin~iri~ll nniiiii■■ >«■ vii*. ■ r.i Lf o* "’Ffc :iA • * % J.;;: \ VI - 1. 2. 3. 4. m APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164, Second Scries - Adopted U/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address:P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) DATE Applicant's Full Name 5^. FIRST MIDDLE LAST nyA HOUSE NUMBER /O ' vrz - ■iOUSE NUMBER ^STREEJ HOME PHONE CITY STATE Appljcant's Business TYPE jK BUSINESS 1r. 3 93S' ShcreJ.n^ J)r BUSINESS NAME STREET ADDRESS .OefLAA^^iki MAILING ADDRESS CITY Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related de^e between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place. ^__________________________________ / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO, TOBACCO PRODUCTS. O^OBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAW^f THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY Signatute Date The issuance of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the app«cant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 121197 3 ■i. ' 2. 3. 4. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SF.I T ■ TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. Id4, Second Scries - Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono I ^ >m. . I U • * 1 I ^ ^Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Ci f ^ OP '•wi'tv..i . ^ FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) ATE /C. ^(Dod 1. Applicant's Full Name rA)iLLl Am FIRST LO<^cr^ MIDDLE LAST Applicanf 8 Home Address /4acKherr^ /4-i U HOUSE NUMBER ^STREET Long LoK<t, CITY (7 /ML STATE Ci ^73- </C36 HOME PHONE Applicant's Business We Li quo ft. Si-GC^ TYPE OF BUSINESS \7i^Ui Li(k[jof< n(L BUSINESS NAME BUSINESS PHONE ^!Ce \j].W)atr}a-/-o 61,0 P STREET ADDRESS V •O' 9^0iL3oL.LcjJ<^ mr\ 6'S3:>^(> ILING ADDRESS CITY Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee takes place.C. ifCiif'i mft Q fi ^, f'm fid u C-Ci T 0 i Q c/T ___ <or r^l^j-hpr/ QtorJUfh ’t , at.L a r¥ hc^hin/P___ 4iv^ O r. u r\^ (I ' ’ * ____________ / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO, TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. Signature s /O aJtft) The issuence of a license under this ordinarKe shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the applicani and shall not enbtJe the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. $ 121197 3 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES (Ordinance No. 164. Second Series • Adopted 12/08/97) Make check payable to: City of Orono Mailing address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 1. FEE: $100.00 (February 1-January 31) Applicant's Full Name Gr/in'h______'Rujie.// /-//) -aooo DATE 2. FIRST MIDDLE Applicant's Home Address “7/0 /O. Cd) ♦ HOUSE NUMBER PToChlA STREET CITY STATE LAST homephcIME PHONE 3. 4. Applicant's Business C^n 14- Cou TYPE OF BUSINESS Jia KfUieos} G o /4~ 0rCto J-oK, BUSINESS PHONE ^/0S~ • f^rrrrt STREET ADDRESS Oran 0 r 7ID BUSINESS NAME . « 7/ o O'"* w • nncuncA . MAILING ADDRESS Describe how the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the license or employee takes^ place. TuA-Zomcr mlCs 4a ^rt>AuJ(-■ Zf Cujla>^ aocf ^ n Arot^'A- /oc/u*C toxAtruj , k / HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO. TOBACCO PRODUCTS. OR TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES AT THE ABOVE LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ORONO. /-/C)~QO Date The Issuence of a license under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 121197 3 21 Jan 2000 Fri 11:24 AM Check Number Check Number 60562 Check Register City of Orono Date Name 60562 AIRTOUCH CELLtJLAR/BBLLBVUB 21-Jan-OO AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE Totals Check Number 60562 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE Check Number 60563 60563 ALBERG WATER SERVICES 21-Jan-OO Totals Check Number ALBERG WATER SERVICES 60563 ALBERG WATER SERVICES Check Number 60564 ALL STAR EI^CTRIC Transaction Amount 158.15 158.15 20,571.80 20,571.80 Page 1 Comments CELL PHONESCOIJMCIL meeting JAN 2 4 2000 Ull Y UHO/VO WELL 1 REHAB - RFP »2 FIN 60564 21-Jan-OO Totals Check Number ALL STAR ELECTRIC 60564 ALL STAR ELECTRIC 2,883.75 2,883.75 HWY LTG MAINT Check Number 60565 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE 60565 21-Jan-OO Totals Check Number ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE 60565 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE 227.91 227.91 4 DRAWER FILE Check Number 60566 ASSOC OF METRO MUNICIPALITIES 60566 21-Jan-OO Totals Check Number ASSOC OF METRO MUNICIPALITIES 60566 ASSOC OF METRO MUNICIPALITIES 2,450.00 2,450.00 AMM MEMBERSHIP - 2000 Check Number 60567 AT a T - 60567 21-Jan-OO Totals Check Number AT a T - 60567 AT a T - 33.84 33.84 LONG DIST CHGS Check Number 60568 BLACKOWIAX a SON 60568 60568 60568 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO Totals Check Number BLACKOWIAX a SON BLACKOWIAX a SON BLACKOWIAX a SON 60568 BLACKOWIAX a SON 78.90 -55.89 191.72 214.73 WASTE SERVICE 12/99 CREDIT DUB-WASTE SRVC WASTE SERVICE 12/99 Check Number 60571 BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE a ASSOC,1,561.07 WELL NO 1 REHAB 10/99 21 Jan 2000 Check Register Page 2 Fri 11:24 AM City o£ Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 60571 BONESTRCX)ROSENE a ASSOC. 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE &ASSOC.1,471.75 FERNDALE LS/HWY 12 BYPASS 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE &ASSOC.1,188.41 TH12/STUBBS BY RD CLOSURE 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE &ASSOC.1,170.00 ELECTRONIC MAPPING 10/99 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,196.00 ELECTRONIC MAPPING 10/99 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,128.74 Ikl NAVARRE AREA 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,303.86 IStI CASCO FERNDALE AREA 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.777.94 LS 613 CLOSE OUT 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.629.51 ORONO ORCHARD SWR RFP 2 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.9,500.40 ORONO ORCHARD SWR 10/99 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.216.63 EDGWO HILLS SWR RFP2 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.110.25 EDGEWOOD HILLS SWR 10/99 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.73.50 NAV WTR PLANT START UP 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.943.50 HACKBERRY FLOW METER-LL 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,169.00 SAGA HILLS ACCESS/PKG LOT 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,872.04 OCTOBER COUNCIL MTGS 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.2,802.00 ST EDWARDS CHURCH SWR/WTR 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.3,178.00 WELL NO 1 REHAB 8/99-9/99 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.2,388.75 FERNDALE LS/HWY 12 BYPASS 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.3,024.54 TH12/STUBBS BY RD CLOSURE 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.441.65 HEAD SWR 9/99 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.338.00 Ikl NAVARRE AREA 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.541.56 WEBBER HILLS SWR 9/99 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.2,807.93 ORONO ORCHARD SWR 9/99 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,326.00 ELECTRONIC MAPPING 9/99 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,305.25 ELECTRONIC MAPPING 9/99 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,489.26 NAV WTR PLA.N7 REHAB 9/99 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.985.05 EDGEWOOD KILLS SWR 9/99 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.793.75 HACKBERRY FLOW METER-LL 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.1,578.25 SAGA HILLS ACCESS/PKG LOT 60571 21-Jan-OO BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.3,808.64 SEPT COUNCIL MTGS Totals Check Number 60571 BONESTROO ROSENE k ASSOC.51,121.23 Check Number 60572 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 60572 60572 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO Totals Check Number BRYATi ROCK PRODUCTS INC, BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC, 60572 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC Check Number 60573 CARLSON EQUIPMENT 60573 21-Jan-OO CARLSON EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 60573 CARLSON EQUIPMENT 4,520.07 1,911.05 6,431.12 3/4 MINUS ROCK 1 1/2" ROCK 19.37 19.37 COVER Check Number 60574 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 60574 21-Jan-OO CHUNKS LAiSSHCRE AUTO 33.52 OIL CHANCE 21 Jan 2000 Check Register Page Frl 11:24 AM City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 60574 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 60574 21-Jan-OO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 291.21 BLOWER MOTOR 182 60574 21-Jan-OO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 322.90 RADIATOR REPAIR 182 60574 21-Jan-OO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 43.58 COOLING LEAK 180 60574 21-Jan-OO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 199.22 OIL. BATTERY 180 60574 21-Jan-CO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 477.07 OIL. BRAKES. TRANS 178 60574 21-Jan-OO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 397.78 OIL. BRAKES 183 60574 21-Jan-OO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 534.31 OIL. TRAN FLD. BELTS 179 60574 21-Jan-OO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 324.24 OIL. BRAKES 184 60574 21-Jan-OO CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 33.52 OIL CHANGE 182 Totals Check Number 60574 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 2.657.35 Check Number 60575 CITY OF WAYZATA 60575 21-Jan-OO CITY OF WAYZATA 675.00 MACHINE RENTAL 60575 21-Jan-OO CITY OF WAYZATA 1.962 05 PURCH WTR 4/99 Totals Check Number 60575 CITY OF WAYZATA Oieck Number 60576 CLASSIFIEDS 60576 21-Jan-OO CLASSIFIEDS Totals Check Number 60576 CLASSIFIEDS Qieck Number 60577 COACH USA 60577 21-Jan>00 Totals Check Number COACH USA 60577 COACH USA Check Number 60578 60578 60578 CYS UNIFORMS 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO CYS UNIFORMS CYS UNIFORMS Totals Check Number 60578 CYS uniforms Check Number 60579 DCA C0579 60579 60579 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO Totals Check Number DCA DCA OCA 60579 DCA 2«637.05 59.50 59.50 281.75 281.75 240.20 91.30 331.50 735.00 85.00 159.60 079.60 ADV FOR EMP-POL RECORDS BUS FOR MET COUNCIL TOUR PANTS. SHIRTS - J JOHNSON SHIRTS - WITTKE ENRMNT FORMS. MTGS COBRA ADM - 12/99 FLEX PLAN ADM - 12/99 Check Number 6C580 DCA - WIRE ONLY 60580 21-Jan-OO DCA - WIRE ONLY 1.311.14 SPEND ACCTS-1/14/00 21 Jan 2000 Prl 11:24 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 4 Check Number Date Name Check Number 60580 DCA - wire ONLY Totals Check Number 60580 DCA - WIRE ONLY Check Number 60581 DELL 60581 21-Jan-OO DELL Check Number 60588 6058B FIRSTAR TRUST CO - WIRE ONLY 21-Jan-OO FIRSTAR TRUST CO - WIRE ONLY Transaction Amount 1.311.14 1,502.74 Comments PHI 500 OPTIPLEX Totals Check Number 60581 DELL 1,502.74 Check Number 60582 DELTA DENTAL 60582 21-Jan-OO DELTA DENTAL -101.30 DENTAL 1/2000 60582 21-Jan-OO DELTA DENTAL 42.70 DENTAL 1/2000 60582 21-Jan-OO DELTA DENTAL 42.70 DENTAL 1/2000 60582 21-Jan-OO DELTA DENTAL -15.90 DENTAL 1/2000 60582 21-Jan-OO DELTA DENTAL 58.60 DENTAL 1/2000 60582 21-Jan-OO DELTA DENTAL 996.90 DENTAL 1/2000 Totals Check Number 60582 DELTA DENTAL 1,023.70 Check Number 60583 DEPUTY REGISTRAR 60583 21-Jan-OO DEPUTY REGISTRAR 2,756.60 TAX, LICENSE PATCH TRK Totals Check Number 60583 DEPUTY REGISTRAR 2,756.60 Check Number 60584 DNR WATERS 60584 21-Jan-OO DNR WATERS 50.00 1999 PUMPNG PEE-IRRIGAT Totals Check Number 60584 DNR WATERS 50.00 Check Number 60585 E.S .G. COMPANY INC. 60585 21-Jan-OO E.S.O. COMPANY INC.249.99 BLADE SHARPENING Totals Check Nun^r 60585 E.S.G. COMPANY INC.249.99 Check Number 60586 EXPRESS MESSENGER 60586 21-J««n-00 EXPRESS MESSENGER 95.90 DELIVERY SERVICE Totals Check Number 60586 EXPRESS MESSENGER 95.90 \ 240,000.00 KRA DEBT DUE 1/lS/OO 31 Jan 2000 Fri 11:24 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 5 Check Number Date Name Transaction Amount Comments Check Number 60588 60588 60588 60588 60538 60588 60588 60588 60588 60588 60588 60588 60588 60588 60588 60588 FIRSTAR 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-00 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO TRUST CO • FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR FIRSTAR WIRE TRUST TRUST TRUST TRUST TRUST TRUST TRUST TRUST TRUST TRUST TRUST TRUST TRUST TRUST TRUST ONLY CO - CO - CO - CO - CO - CO - CO - CO - CO - CO - CO - CO - CO - CO - CO - WIRE WIRE WIRE WIRE WIRE WIRE WIRE WIRE WIRE WIRE WIRE WIRE WIRE WIRE WIRE ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY 74,454.69 12,460.31 -12,460.31 85.000. 00 40,351.88 125,000.00 35,947.50 75.000. 00 136.593.00 133.407.00 3,084.38 1,417.50 1,384.12 7.087.00 6.922.00 HRA DEBT DUE 1/15/00 HRA DEBT DUE 1/15/00 TRUST A/C-HRA DEBT JAN 15 PRINC DUE 2/1/2000 INT DUE 2/1/2000 PRINC DUB 2/1/2000 INT DUB 2/1/2000 PRINC DUB 2/1/2000 PRINC DUE 2/1/2000 PRINC DUE 2/1/2000 INT DUE 2/1/2000 INT 1/1/00 TO 2/1/00 INT DUE 1/1/00 TO 2/1/00 INT 8/1/99 TO 12/31/99 INT 8/1/99 TO 12/31/99 Totals Check Number 60588 FIRSTAR TRUST CO - HIRE ONLY 965,649.07 Check Number 60589 G 6 K SERVICES 60589 21-Jan-OO Q k K SERVICES 56.14 HAT SERVICE - PD 60589 21-Jan-OO G k K SERVICES 42.01 MAT SERVICE - CC 60589 21-Jan-OO G a K SERVICES 42.01 MAT SERVICE - ADM 60589 21-Jan-OO G fi K SERVICES 79.31 UNIFORMS 60589 21-Jan-OC G a K SERVICES 35.25 SHOPTOWELS - 60589 21-Jan-OO G a K SERVICES 8.61 UNIFORM - STEFFENHAGEN 60589 21-Jan-OO G a K SERVICES 14.22 UNIFORM - RATHBUNS 60589 21-Jan-OO G a K SERVICES 8.61 UNIFORMS 60589 21-Jan-OO G a K SERVICES 86.44 MAT SERVICE - PH 60589 21-Jan-OO G a K SERVICES 14.22 UNIFORM - RATHBUN 60589 21-Jan-OO G a K SERVICES 77.26 UNIFORMS Totals Check Number 60589 G a K SERVICES 464.08 Check Number 60590 GAPPA, GREG 60590 21-Jan-OO GAPPA, GREG 108.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT Totals Check Number 60590 GAPPA, GREG 108.00 Check Number 60591 GEO ANALYTICS 60591 21-Jan-OO GEO ANALYTICS 9,929.18 GOVERN SOFTWARE 12/99 60591 21-Jan-OO GEO ANALYTICS 3,720.07 GOVERN 11/1-11/30/99 Totals Check Number 60591 GEO ANALYTICS 13,649.25 Check Number 60592 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC I i J r I 21 Jan 2000 Fri 11:24 AM Check Number Check Register City of Orono Date Name Transaction Amount Page 6 Comments Check Number 60592 60592 60592 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 21-Jan-OO GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 21-Jan-OO GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC, Totals Check Number 60592 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 8.75 8.75 17.50 LOCATES 12/99 LOCATES 12/99 Check Number 60593 HANKINS CHEMICAL 60593 21-Jan-OO Totals Check Number HANKINS OSMICAL 60593 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 1^35.34 1,135.34 FLOURINE, CHLORINE Dieck Number 60594 HENN CO CHIEFS OF POL. ASSOC. 60594 21-Jan-OO Totals Check Number HENN CO CHIEFS OF POL. ASSOC, 60594 HENN CO CHIEFS OF POL. ASSOC, 40.00 40.00 MBRSHIP - CHESWICK 2000 Check Number 60595 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. 60595 21-Jan-OO HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.618.13 TNT NOTICES Totals Check Number 60595 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS.618.13 Check Number 60597 HINSHAN & CULBERTSON 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 189.00 EDGEWOOD HILLS SrWER 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 198.00 HEAD SEWER PROJ 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 132.00 SAGA HILL PARK 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 121.00 LEGAL APPLIC NOV 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 72.00 HEAD SEWER PROJ 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1,364.84 HOYT RETAINING WALL 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1,106.66 LEGAL SERVICE NCV 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 231.00 ADULT USE ORDINANCE 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 99.00 NATIONAL GAURD DUTY 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 257.34 GOETTEN-SPCL LOT COMB 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 805.10 LU2AICH 82492 - TREES 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 44.00 STUBBS BAY RD CUL-DE-SAC 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1,101.00 LEGAL SERVICE OCT 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 594.00 LIQUOR LICENSE - JIWIY'S 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 440.00 NATIONAL GAURD DUTY 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 32.00 SAGA HILLS PARK 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 32.00 EDGEWOOD HILLS SEWER 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 835.08 SAGA HILLS PARK 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 16.00 STUBBS BY RD CUL-DE-SAC 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 1,063.00 ADULT USB ORDINANCE 60597 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW k CULBERTSON 3,405.82 LUZAICH 82492 - TREES 21 Jan 2000 Fri 11:24 AH Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Ntimber 60597 60597 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON 21-Jan-OO HINSHAW fc CULBERTSON Totals Check Number 60597 HINSHAW fc CULBERTSON Check Number 6059S HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIGHT CO 60598 21-Jan-OO HUMANE SOCIETY OP WRIGHT CO Totals Check Number 60598 HUMANE SOCIETY OP WRIGHT CO Check Number 60599 ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS 60599 21-Jan-OO ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS Totals Check Number 60599 ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS Check Number 60600 INPRATECH 60600 21-Jan-OO INFRATECH Totals Check Number 60600 INFRATECH Check Number 60601 INT'L ASSN OF CHIEFS OF POLICE 60601 60601 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO INT'L ASSN OF CHIEFS OP POLICE INT'L ASSN OF CHIEFS OF POLICE Totals Check Number 60601 INT'L ASSN OF CHIEFS OF POLICE Check Number 60602 INT'L ASSOC OF PLUM,MECH OFFIC 60602 21-Jan-OO INT'L ASSOC OP PLUM.MECH OFFIC Totals Check Number 60602 INT'L ASSOC OF PLUM.MECH OFFIC Check Number 60603 f^ELLY INi; 60603 21-Jan-OO KELLY INN Totals Check Number 60603 KELLY INN Check Number 60604 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA 60604 21-Jan-OO KENIiVdl » POTTS, PA Totals Ch»*ck Number 60604 KElM4..«t ti. POTTS, PA Check Number 60605 LA>E COUirTRY CHAPTER Transaction Amount 1,069.06 13,207.90 42.50 42.50 573.75 573.75 1.807.56 1.887.56 100.00 100.00 200.00 150.00 150.00 155 49 155.49 2,291.66 2,291.66 Page 7 Comments LEGAL APPLIC OCT BOARDING 10/99 ICMA MBRSHIP - HOORSE SEWER LINE CLEANING 2000 MBRSHP-MOROWCZYNSKI 2000 MBRSHIP - CHESWICK lAPMO MBRSHIP - OMAN LODGING-CHESWICK/MRCZYNSK PROSECUTIONS 12/99 21 Jan 2000 Pri 11:24 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 8 Check Number Check Number Date Name 60605 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER Transaction Amount Comments 60605 21-Jan-OO LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER 50.00 MBRSHPS-OMAN, DAVIS Totals Check Number 60605 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER 50.00 Check Number 60606 LAKE MINNETONKA PICTURE CO 60606 21-Jan-OO LAKE MINNETONKA PICTURE CO 226.00 MEMBERSHIP 1/1-12/31/00 Totals Check Number 60606 LAKE MINNETONKA PICTURE CO 226.00 Check Number 60607 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN 60607 21-Jan-OO LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN 1.000.00 GRIPPENTROP 113^20997 Totals Check Number 60607 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN 1,000.00 Check Number 60608 LOGIS 60608 21-Jan-OO LOGIS 958.50 PIUS APPLIC Xl/99 Totals Check Number 60608 LOGIS 958.50 Check Number 60609 LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF CO^«1ERC£ 60609 21-Jan-OO LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 50.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 60609 21-Jan-OO LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 50.00 MEMBERSHIP - MOORSE Totals Check Number 60609 LONG LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 100.00 Check Number 60610 M.E.M.A. TREASURER 60610 21-Jan-OO M.E.M.A. TREASURER 30.00 2000 MBRSHIP - CHESWICK Totals Check Number 60610 M.E.M.A. TREASURER 30.00 Check Number 60613 MEDICA CHOICE 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 MED ELECT 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 1,820.07 MED ELECT 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 166.63 MED ELECT 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 606.69 MED ELECT 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 MED ELECT 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 3,915.10 MED ELECT 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 MED HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 427.75 MED HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 2,416.72 MED HIGH 1/2000 I . r r> -'■n ” '.*i f " • r 21 Jan 2000 Check Register Pri 11:24 AM City of Orono Check Transaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 60613 MEDICA CHOICE 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 606.69 MED HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 1.130.66 MED HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 MED HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 1.920.49 MED HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 3.492.70 MED HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 MEDICA HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE -23.31 MEDICA HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 876.88 MEDICA HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 606.69 MEDICA HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 82.66 MEDICA HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 1,045.09 MEDICA HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 1,920.49 MEDICA HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 3,492.70 MEDICA HIGH 1/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 MEDICA ELECT 2/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 1,820.07 MEDICA ELECT 2/2000 60613 21 Tan-00 MEDICA CHOICE 166.63 MEDICA ELECT 2/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 MEDICA ELECT 2/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 606.69 MEDICA ELECT 2/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 202.23 MEDICA ELECT 2/2000 60613 21-Jin-OO MEDICA CHOICE 4.156.74 MEDICA ELECT 2/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 202.22 MEDICA LOW 2/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 202.22 MEDICA LOW 2/2000 60613 21-Jan-OO MEDICA CHOICE 281.38 MEDICA LOW 2/2000 Totals Check Number 60613 MEDICA CHOICE 33.558.49 Check Number 60614 MEDTOX LABORATORIES 60614 21-Jan-00 MEDTOX LABORATORIES 53.00 DRUG TESTING Totals Check Number 60614 MEDTOX LABORATORIES :.3 - 00 Check Number 60615 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 60615 21-Jan-OO MET COLTiCIL EN ONMENTAL SVCS 22,716.00 SEWER SERVICE 2/00 Page 9 Totals Check Number 60615 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 22.716.00 Check Number 60616 MILE 60616 21-Jan-OO MILE 135.00 DRNK DRVG 2000 - BORIS 60616 21-Jan-OO MILE 135.00 DRNK DRVG 2000 - FARNIOK 60616 21-Jan-OO MILE 135.00 DRNK DRVG 2000 - MCNICHOL Totals Check Number 60616 MILE 405.00 Check dumber 60617 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 60617 21-Jan-OO MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 13.50 MEDICAL OXYGEN 21 Jan 2000 Fri 11:24 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Nuinber Date Name Check Number 60617 60617 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 21-Jan-OO MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Totals Check Number 60617 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Check Number 60618 MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASSN 60618 60618 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASSN MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASSN Totals Check Number 60618 MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASSN Check Number 60619 MN CHIEFS OF POL. ED. FOUNDATI 60619 21-Jan-OO MN CHIEFS OF POL. ED. FOUNDATI Totals Check Number 60619 MN CHIEFS OP POL. ED. FOUNDATI Check Number 60620 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 60620 21-Jan-OO MN DEPT OP HEALTH Totals Check Number 60620 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Check Number 60621 MN STATE TREASURER • «.t»21 21-Jan-OO MN STATE TREASURER ‘^htick Number 60621 MN STATE TREASURER Check 60622 NORTH STAR CHAPTER I.C.B.O. 60522 21-Jan-00 NORTH STAR CHAPTER I.C.B.O Totals Check Number 60622 NORTH STAR CHAPTER I.C.B.O Check Humber 60623 NORTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL 60623 21-Jan-OO NORTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL Totals Check Number 60623 NORTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL Check Number 60624 OBRIEN. RANDY 60624 60624 21-Jam-OO 21-Jan-OO OBRIEN. RANDY OBRIEN. RANDY Totals Check Number 60624 OBRIEN. RANDY Transaction Amount 27.00 40.50 75.00 150.00 225.00 245.00 245.00 1.086.00 1.086.00 20.00 20.00 45.00 45.00 2.000.00 2.000.00 73.40 19.00 92.40 Page 10 Comments ACETYLENE. OXYGEN MBRSHIP -MDROCZYNSKI 2000 MBRSHP - CHESWICK CONF REG-CHESWICK WT CONNECTION FEE 12/99 CERTIFIED BUILDING OFFICL MBRSHP-OMAN.DAVIS SITE EVAL-3790 SHORELINE WORK BOOTS DRIVER LICQISE ENDORSEMNT 21 Jan 2000 Pri 11:24 AN Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60625 60625 PERSONNEL DECISIONS 21-Jan-OO PERSONNEL DECISIONS Totals Check Number 60625 PERSONNEL DECISIONS Check Number 60626 PIONEER 60626 21-Jan-OO PIONEER Totals Check Number 60626 PIONEER Check Number 60627 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC. 60627 21-Jan-00 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC, Totals Check Number 60627 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC. Check Number 60628 RC IDENTIFICATIONS 60628 21-Jan-OO RC IDENTIFICATIONS Totals Check Number 60628 RC IDENTIFICATIONS Check Nl mber 60629 RDO FINANCIAL SERVICES 60629 21-Jan-OO RDO FINANCIAL SERVICES Totals Check Number 60629 RDO FINANCIAL SERVICES Check Number 60630 RED APRON CATERING 60630 21-Jan-OO RED APRON CATERING Totals Check Number 60630 RED APRON CATERING Check Number 60631 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON 60631 21-Jan-OO RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON Totals Check Number 60631 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON Check Number 60632 SA-AG INC. 60632 60632 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO SA-AG INC. SA-AG INC. Totals Check Number 60632 SA-AG INC. Check Number 60633 SCHWABB INC. Transaction Amount 30.00 30.00 359.52 359.52 1,845.02 1,845.02 5.33 5.33 66.32 66.32 118.53 118.53 18,958.77 18,958.77 1,593.02 2,507.58 4,100.60 Page 11 Comments POSITION PROFILE PUB ORD 8194, 2ND SERIES LS 826 PUMP REPAIRS ID CARD - HENDRICKS SPIRL LEV BOX LUNCHES-WORX SESSICXI FINAL PMT - PATCH BOX ROAD SAND ROAD SAND 21 Jan 2000 Fri 11:24 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60633 60633 SCHWABB INC. 21-Jan-OO SCHWABB INC, Totals Check Number 60633 SCHWABB INC, Check Number 60634 SNYDER DRUG STORES 60634 60634 60634 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO SNYDER DRUG STORES SNYDER DRUG STORES SNYDER DRUG STORES Totals Check Number 60634 SNYDER DRUG STORES Check Number 60635 STREICISRS 60635 60635 60635 60635 60635 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-00 21-Jar.-00 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO STREICHERS STREICHERS .STREICHERS STREICHERS STREICHERS Totals Check Number 60635 STREICHERS Check Number 60636 SUBURBAN TIRE INC. 60636 21-Jan-OO SUBURBAN TIRE INC. Totals Check Number 60636 SUBURBAN TIRE INC. Check Number 60637 SUPERIOR FORD 60637 21-Jan-OO SUPERIOR FORD Totals Check Number 60637 SUPERIOR FORD Check Number 60638 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 60638 21-Jan-OO TEMPORARIES - TO - GO Totals Check Number 60638 TEMFORARIES-TO-GO Check Number 60639 TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY 60639 60639 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY Totals Check Number 60639 TOLL GAS k WELDING SUPPLY QiecK Number 60640 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Transaction Amount 32.06 32.06 2.32 2.15 29.78 34.25 210.55 82.08 39.95 64.95 34.03 431.56 279.12 279.12 99.30 99.30 324.00 324.00 44.62 6. OS 50.67 Page 12 Comments NOTARY STAMP - BERRY ’UFFS 1 HR PHOTO BATTERIES 6 HANDCUFFS SWEATR, CUFFS, IRR - SKI SWEATER - JENSEN SWEATER - FISCHENICH BELT - BORIS TIRES HUB CAPS TEMP HELP-WK END 1/9/2000 75% ARGON 25% C02 CYLINDER RENTAL . . .. mi—- .r-r^ t.-awTr- j-ii'i»n 21 Jan 2000 Fri 11:24 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60640 60640 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 21-Jan-OO UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 60640 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Check Number 60641 UNIV OF MINNESOTA 60641 60641 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO UNIV OF MINNESOTA UNIV OF MINNESOTA Totals Check Number 60641 UNIV OP MINNESOTA Check Number 60642 US WEST INTERPRISE 60642 60642 60642 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO US NEST INTERPRISE US NEST INTERPRISE US NEST INTERPRISE Totals Check Number 60642 US WEST INTERPRISE Check Number 60643 VOGT HEATING & AIR 60643 60643 21-Jan-OO 21-Jan-OO VOGT HEATING k AIR VOGT HEATING k AIR Totals Check Number 60643 VOGT HEATING k AIR Check Number 60644 WARNING LITJS OF MN 60644 21-Jan-OO WARNING LITES OF MN Totals Check Number 60644 WARNING LITES OP MN Check Number 60645 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 60645 21-Jan-OO WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE Totals Check Number 60645 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE Check Number 60646 YOCUM OIL CO INC. 60646 21-Jan-OO YOCUM OIL CO INC, Totals Check Number 60646 YOCUM OIL CO INC Grand Total Trainsaction Amount 44.00 44.00 180.00 180.00 360.00 409.18 532.50 361.05 1,302.73 2,000.00 613.03 2,613.03 108.95 108.95 101.90 101.90 211.18 211.18 1,192,566.68 Page 13 Comments PO BOX RENTAL BLDG OFF INST - OMAN BLDG OFF INST - DAVIS T1 Li:iE T1 LINE T1 MONTHLY CTGS CHECK FURN/CHG FILTERS AIR CONDIT REPAIR barricat*?^ TIRE REPAIR FUEL OIL - CLUB HOUSE 21 Jan 2000 Pri 11:24 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 14 Finance User Initials RJO Friday 21 January 2000 11:23 AM Start 11:24 AM Finish Buffer Name History Records Read Records Selected Number of Pages 1513 228 14 Selected by Check/receipt Date Equal To 24-Jan-00 Sorted by Check Number Totals No Page Breaks 10 Jan 2000 Mon 4:51 AM ChecV. Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 047042 047042 PETERSON, BARBARA Totals Check Number 047042 Check Number 047041 047043 NOORSE, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 047043 Check Number 047044 047044 FLINT, RICHARD Totals Check Number 047044 Check Number 047045 047045 JABBOUR, GABRIEL E. Totals Check Number 04704S Check Number 047046 047046 KELLEY* CHARLES Totals Check Number 047046 Check Number 047047 047047 SANSEVERE, ROBERT K. Totals Check Number 047047 Grand Total Check Date lO-Jan-00 lO-Jan-00 lO-Jan-00 lO-Jan-00 lO-Jan-00 10.Jan-00 Page 1 Check Amount 269.36 269.36 184.70 164.70 269.36 269.36 323.22 323.22 269.36 269.36 269.36 269.36 1,585.36 12 Jan 2000 Wed 5:07 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Kumber Employee Name Check Number 04*’04 9 047049 JOHNSON, MARY ANN Totals Check Number 047049 Check Number 047050 047050 BERRY, HEIDI N. Totals Check Number 047050 Check Number 047051 047051 HASEMAN, CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 047051 Check Number 047052 047052 MOORSE, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 047052 Check Number 047053 047053 VEB, LINDA S. Totals Check Number 0470S3 Check Number 047054 047054 KUEHN, THOMAS M. Totals Check Number 047034 Check Number 047055 047055 OLSON, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 047055 Check Number 047056 047056 PE'TTIT, SANDRA K. Totals Check Number 047056 Check Number 047057 Check Date 12-Jan-00 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO Page 1 Check Amount 568.62 568.62 696.44 696.44 835.55 835.55 1.571.88 1.571.88 1,070.38 1.070.38 1,062.35 l,n62.35 1.45 1.45 399.04 399.04 12 Jan 2000 Wed 5:07 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 047057 047057 ANDERSON, BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 047057 Check Number 047058 047058 BOBZIEN, SUE A. Totals Check Number 047058 Check Number 047059 047059 BORIS, SCOTT H. Totals Check Nur^er 047059 Check Number 047060 047050 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. Totals Check Number 047060 Check Number 047061 047061 CHESWICK, GARY B. Totals Check Number 047061 Check Number 047062 047062 CORNZCK, JAMES L. Totals Check Number 047062 Check Number 047063 047063 DEMBOUSKl, JAY C. Totals Check Number 047063 Check Number 047064 047064 ERICKSON, KURT R Totals Check Number 047064 Check Number 047065 047065 FARNIOK. CORREY L. Check Date 12-Jan-00 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO Page 2 Chuck Amount 395.99 395.99 783.59 783.59 1,025.22 1,025.22 107.13 107.13 1,532.87 1,532.87 1,344.69 1,344.69 1,295.90 1,295.90 1,383.25 1,383.25 1,559.15 XA 1 ! i j 12 Jan 2000 Wed 5:07 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 047065 Totals Check Number 047065 Check Number 047066 047066 FISCHENICH, DAN T. Totals Chv-k Number 047066 Check Number 047067 047067 FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K, Totals Check Number 047067 Check Number 047068 047068 JOHNSON, JEFFREY Totals Check Number 047068 Check Number 047069 047069 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 047069 Check Number 047070 047070 MADSON, ADRIENNE M. Totals Check Number 047070 Check Number 047071 047071 MCNALLY, STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 047071 Check Number 047072 047072 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L. Totals Check Number 047072 Check frumber 047073 047073 MOROWCZYNSKI. JAMES Check Date 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO Page 3 Qieck Amount 1,559.15 1.366.72 1.366.72 1.090.96 1,090.98 578.22 578.22 1.323.25 1.323.25 476.43 476.43 1,139.14 1,139.14 627.98 €27.98 1,510.55 4 12 Jan 2000 Med 5:07 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Humber Employee Name Check Number 047073 Totals Check Humber 047073 Check Number 047074 047074 PERSELL, MILLIAM R. Totals Check Number 047074 Check Number 047075 047075 SCHOENHOFP, JOHN B. Totals Check Number 047075 Check Number 047076 047076 TOMCHECK, LAMRENCE P. Totals Check Number 047076 Check Number 047077 047077 TOMCZYK, MARK H. Totals Check Number 047077 Check Number 047078 047078 WITTKE, ANTHONY A. Totals Check Number 047078 Check Number 047079 047079 HENDRICKS, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 047079 Check Number 047080 047080 JENSEN, CHRISTOPHER E. Totals Check Number 047080 Check Number 047081 047081.BOTTENBERG. WENDY C. Totals Check Number 047081 Check Date 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-00 12-Jan-00 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO Page 4 Check Amount 1,510.55 190.01 190.01 1,290.93 1,290.93 248.25 248.25 1,343.78 1,343.78 628.39 628.39 605.34 605.34 242.19 242.19 953.24 953.24 aasmsauKiiissvs 12 Jan 2000 Hed 5:07 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 047087 047082 DAVIS, MARK Totals Check Nunber 047082 Check Number 047083 047083 GAFFRON, MICHAEL P. Totals Check Nunber 047083 Check Number 047084 047084 GAPPA, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 047084 Qieck Number 047085 047085 MEYER, WILLIAM C. Totals Check Number 047085 Check Number 047086 047086 OMAN LYL*? C. Totals Check Number 047086 Qieck Number 047087 047087 PENCE, CHRISTOPHER M. Totals Gieck Number 047087 Check Number 047088 047088 WEINBERGER, PAUL B. Totals Check Number 047088 Check Number 047089 047089 BRINKHAUS, JOHN F. Totals Check Number 047089 Check Number 047090 047Q90 DEBAERB, DONALD L. Check Date 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO Page 5 Check Amount 1,049.84 1,049.84 1,169.98 1,169.98 1,542.29 1,542.29 369.52 369.52 345.79 345.79 830.71 830.71 1,068.70 1,068.70 1,169.33 1,169.33 992.36 4 \ IM— II ■'ll frii II I I I I Bis>>iiiiiii niiiii mill iiwiiiiiiiBii ■■ iiii 111 ■■liiiii II iiMiitfn |■^lllll 11 imnwtiii«Miii ........ iiiinii iriinifc ~ n ■ i 12 Jan 2000 Wed 5:07 AM Check Number Employee Name Check Humber 047090 Totals Check Number 047090 Check Register City of Orono Page 6 Check Number 047091 047091 GREGORY, JAMES D. Totals Check Number 047091 Check Number 047092 047092 HANSEN, STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 047092 Check Number 047093 047093 CBERAIQNER, SCOTT 0. Totals Check Number 047093 Check Number 047094 047094 OBRIEN, RANDY L. Totals Check Number 047094 Check Number 047095 047095 PAIHER, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 047095 Check Number 047096 04709' RATriBUN, BARRY J. Totals Check Number 047096 Check Number 047097 04*097 SKREEN, DALE S. Totals Check Number 047097 Check Number C47090 047090 STEFFENHAGEN, RONALD E Check Date 12-Jan-00 12-Jan-00 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-OO 12-Jan-r*> 12-Jan-OO Check Amount 992.36 705.31 705.31 912.21 912.21 500.25 500.25 05 30J.05 704.09 704.09 1.177.00 1.177.00 955.22 955.22 12-Jan-OO 1,007.65 12 Jan 2000 Med 5:07 AM Ch<“ck Register City of Orono Page 7 Check Number Eii^loyee Name Check Date Check Amount Check Number 047098 Totals Check Number 047098 1.087.65 Grand Total 44.221.00 '^ir*r3TT»— 12 Jan 2000 Hed 5:07 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 8 Payroll User Initials Wednesday 12 January 2000 5:07 AM Start 5:07 AM Finish Buffer Name Check Reg Records Read Records Selected Number of Pages 50 50 8 Selected by Check Date Equal To 12-Jan-OO Sorted by Check Number Totals No Page Breaks INFORMATION ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING COI iMni. MltETlNG JAN 2 4 2000 OF Ull Y Ur UliUNU 2000 ORONO MEETING SCHRDULE - COUNCIL CHAMBERS KEY □ 7:00 p.ni. Council meeting 2nd & 4lh Monday O 6530 p.m. Planning Commission 3rd Monday A 7:15 p.ni. Park Commission 1st Monday \7 Other Event X OfTicial Holiday January 2000 S M T W T F S 2 A 4 5 6 7 8 9n0 11 12 13 14 15 16 Tf 18 @20 21 22 23 M 25 26 27 28 29 30 W 2000 T W T F S 2 3 4 5 6 8l 9 10 11 12 13 16 17 1819 20 23 24 25 26 27 30 31 September S M T W 2000 T F S 1 2 3 rXA 6 7 8 9 10m)NC?13 1415 16 17 031920 21 22 23 24ra26\27 28 29 30 \ |*ritn«ry Klfclinn February 2000 S M T W T F S A 1 2 3 4 5 e ^8 9 10 11 12 13 t14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ir22@2425 26 27^29 October 2000 S lyi T W T F S 1 A 3 4 5 6 7 sraiOII 121314 15(Sl7 18 1920 21 22^24 25 2627 28 29^31 Adopted: December 13, 1999 June 2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4^^ 6 7 8 9 10 11 E 13 14 15 16 17 18 ffS 20 21 22 23 24 27 28 29 30 ‘PLANNING COMMISSION - May through October - 1st Tuesday is an alternate meeting date. March S M T 5 12 19 26 2000 W T F S A 12 3 4 Aw S 91011 1315 161718 21122 2324 25 29 3031 Caucttf Day 28 July S. M T W 2000 T F S 2 ^ j(A 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16fl2fl8 19 20 21 22 23 ^ 25 26 27 28 29 30 W November S M T W 1 8 2000 T F S 2 3 4 91X11 12113 1415 161718 19® 2^22 3^X25 26 EtI 28129 30 (Jriirml Hrrliiiii Amended: January 10, 2000 added Board of Review April S M T W 2000 T F S . 1 2 A 4 5 6 7 8 gnoTlI 12 13 14 15 16{ni8 19 20 21 22 23 ra 25 W27 28 29 August 2000 5 M T W T F S A 1 2 3 4 5 6 A 8 9 1011 12 13M15 16 1718 19 20 0 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 31 December 2000 S M T W T F S A 1 23 A 5 6 7 8 9 lOllI 12 13 1415 16 17 W 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31