Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01-10-2000 Council Packet
Public A ttendance Meeting D ate l-IC.C < • C ouncil □ Planning C ommission □ PARK C ommission □ Other x-;- • :•• v-v i OUT THE INFORMATION gREQUESTH) BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. :V; . .. ■ • ; • . ?:W: .V ■ NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME OR NUMBER A •/ liA ___A/A' II >t .3. 3.. 4.. 5.. 6.. 7.. 8. 9.. 10.. 11.. 12.. 13. _ 14. _ 15. _ VtHM COUNCU. IAN 0 1 2000REQ^JEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ CITY ur- oouimO DATE: January 10, 2000 ITEM NO.: | Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Public Hearing for East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer Project A preliminary feasibility study was prepared for this project and was presented to the residents at a neighborhood meeting on December 1st. The project contains eleven properties, ten developed parcels and the City of Orono's Summit Beach Park. All eleven of the parcels were used to calculate the project assessments. Summit Beach Park was included to ensure fairness among all of the property owners. This is also a heavily used park and, in the future, the City may wish to consider the installation of rest room facilities in this park. Six of the septic systems in this area are nonconforming to the 3-foot separation rule, with three of these systems failing because of surface discharges or cesspools. The lot sizes in this area vary from ‘A acre to two acres. The three lots with the failing systems range in size from V4 acre to one acre, with inadequate space for a replacement septic system because of steep slopes and wetlands. The other lots with nonconforming septic systems have very limited replacement areas. Unfortunately, most of the lots with conforming septic systems had new septic systems installed during the time period when the new septic regulations were enacted, and before the frnal decisions on the new sewer projects were made. Almost all of the neighborhood residents attended the meeting or contacted staff prior to the meeting. A majority of the property owners, with conforming septic systems, still support the project. However, they have requested exclusion from the project. They are willing to connect at a future date and pay the appropriate connection fee. A majority of the residents with nonconforming septic systems support the project. This is proposed to be a fully assessed sewer project. Two options for sewer were discussed at the neighborhood meeting. A gravity sewer option with a lift station at an estimated cost of $31,000 per unit was discussed. The residents were not interested in this option because of the high cost. The other option presented was for a pressure sewer system at an estimated assessment of $13,900. For this option, the property owners are required to purchase, operate and maintain their own residential grinder pump station. For other pressure sewer system projects, the property owners were allowed to include an allowance in the assessment for the purchase of their grinder pump station. If the residents decide to receive the $4,500 grinder pump allowance, the estimated project cost will be $18,400. The residents are in favor of the pressure sewer system because of the lower cost and less disturbance to the neighborhood. We have meet with the Long Lake City Administrator and City Engineer regarding this project and,the Fox Ridge project. The City of Long Lake had reviewed and approved this project as part of Ae 1996 Musa expansion. The City has sent a letter regarding connection charges and procedures for sewer billing. The City of Long Lake will require a $1,700 per unit connection fee and will bill Orono for the actual metered flows. The Long Lake connection charge has been included in the project assessment. Of the eleven properties included in the project, four properties have conforming septic systems and the owners have requested exclusion from the project. An additional property owner may request exclusion if he can prove that his septic system is conforming. Summit Beach Park is one of the properties in the project, and the City will need to cover the debt service for this property. If this project is approved, the City will need to finance the debt service on either five or six $13,900 assessments. This debt service cost will be approximately $8,900 per year for six assessments. It is staffs recommendation that the debt service on the opt-out properties be funded from the Sewer Fund so that the general tax levy is not used to fund the project. Our staff recommendation is that this sewer project is necessary because of the numerous failing septic systems and extremely limited septic system replacement areas on these properties. The proposed schedule for this project is for summer 2000 construction. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Conduct Public Hearing for the East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer project. Motion to approve resolution ordering the preparation of plans and specifications for the East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer Project. A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EAST LONG LAKE AREA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared a feasibility study to determine the feasibility of serving the East Long Lake neighborhood with sanitary sewer; and WHEREAS, on December 13*, 1999 the City Council adopted ResolutionNo. 4402 receiving the feasibility report and calling for a public hearing for East Long Lake sanitary sewer improvements; and WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 10* day of January, 2000, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for the installation of sanitary sewer for the East Long Lake neighborhood. Adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on January 10,2000 by a vote ayes and____nays. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk f • fdiU«3 MC = Koft comf *----- L^eor Buitt' E».ST_L0MG Feasibility Report East Long Lake Area Sanitary Sewer Improvements Orono, Minnesota December, 1999 File No. 139-99-105 __J M Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects Decembers, 1999 Pjretroo. ffose^ a-c-"/- n a* e^jiCppcnuntt/ Pnncfp^t: Otto C Bcneitroo. Pt • Jolfph C Antferli*. BS • Varwin l Pf. • C.*e*^h ft. Cook. • acoer: G ScsjaicM. • Jc'ry A iourdcn. • BoO«ft W Be lent. PI. i?icr’A'3 I Tcrrtr. PI, src S^js^n V* Eaerim. CPA. Senior Consultants Aifoc»Afr Pr/ncpair Howard A Sanford. P£. • <e»tfi A Gordon. P.E. • »ooert B. Prcfftrit. PE. • Ricnjrd W. Foster. PE • David O Coikota. PE • desert C. Roisek. A i A • .Mark A. Hanson. PE. • Michael T Raui.-Tiami. FE • Pi • ne-retn P ArdeMon. PS • Mark P Polfs. Pf. • Sidney P WiiiuVhson. PE LS. • Pooert F Kots/ritr • Ajres M. Pmg • Allan Pick Schmidt. PX Of fleet: St- Paul. Pccheste'. Wiiirrar and St Cloud. VN • .Milwaukee. Wi Weoiitc WWW doneit'oo com Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323-0066 Re: Feasibility Report East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer File No. 139-99-105 Dear Mayor and Council: As directed by City staff, we have reviewed the existing conditions and the possible sanitary sewer service to the East Long Lake area in Orono. The properties are located along Old Long Lake Road and East Long Lake Road near the east shore of Long Lake as shown on Figure 1 . The area consists of ten residential units and a City of Orono park. All residences are served by on-site septic systems. The City Park has no sewer system and is currently served by out houses. Current City records indicate the following septic system status for the ten residential units. • 3 units Failing systems • 2 units Non-compliant systems • 4 units Compliant systems • 1 unit Compliance unknown The units with failing systems have no alternate septic sites existing on the property. Two sanitary sewer options were studied as part of this report. The first option is a gravity sewer system as shown on Figure 2. The gravity sewer would be installed in the roadway and will require the complete street reconstruction. Flows will be routed to a lift station that will be constructed on the City Park property near the existing parking lot. Flows would be then be pumped from the lift station to an existing manhole on Old Long Lake Road in the City of Long Lake. The property identified as # 6 on Figure 2 would need to be served by a grinder pump due to the low elevation of the home. All other properties would be served by gravity. The would be restored to its original grade and section. Disturbed lawns would be regraded and restored with sod. The second option is to install a pressure sewer system to serve all eleven properties as shown on Figure 3. With this option a small diameter (2”-3") forcemain would be installed along the edge of the roadways. The forcemain would outlet into an existing manhole on Old Long Lake Road in the City of Long Lake. Individual grinder pumps would be required to serve each of the eleven properties. Services would be extended from the common forcemain to the property lines at a location determined by the property owner. Property owners would be responsible for me cost of the sewer installation between the sewer stub at their property line and their home. Al disturbed areas would be restored as part of the project cost. This option would require minima street disturbance and restoration. Either option will require a permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Estimated costs for the two options are summarized below: East Lone Lake Sanitary Sewer Option Estimated Cost Per Unit Gravity Sewer Pressure Sewer $13,900 % The estimated cost for the Pressure Sewer does not include costs for the individual grinder pumps. The City has indicated that a S4.500 allowance could be added to the assessment for the purchase of an individual grinder station. This would allow for the payment of the grinder station over time. The total assessment would then be $ 18,400. The estimated cost to install the gravity sewer is nearly twicj the cost of the pressure system and is therefore much less desirable. A public informational meeting was held on December 1,1999 where 6 of the 10 residential properties were represented. Those attending the meeting that wanted sanitary sewer were unanimously in favor of the pressure sewer system. The construction of the sanitary sewer to serve the East Long Lake area is feasible from an engineering standpoint. The project is necessary because of the failing and non-conforming septic systems, lack of alternate septic sites and potential pollution problems. The capital cost ^ well as operation and maintenance costs have been considered in determining that the project is cost effective. The cost of these improvements are interrelated and should be assigned equitably to all properties. The following recommendations are presented for consideration by the Orono City Council: 1. 2. That this Report be adopted as the guide for installation of sanitary sewer to serve the East Long Lake area. That the City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the proposed project prior to the public hearing. 3. That a public hearing be held on the proposed improvements. The total estimated project cost of $202,000 should be incorporated in the public notice. The total estimated cost of S202.0CO includes a 5 percent contingency, a 20 percent allowance for design, inspection, legal, and administration costs, and a 5 percent allowance for capitalized interest and bonding costs during construction. Cost estimates are based on 1999 construction costs and can be related to the ENR cost index for December. 1999 of 6127. The cost estimate does not include easement costs that could be incurred on the project. The installation, operation and maintenance of the individual grinder stations and the connection of the sewer to the homes will be the responsibility of the property owners. Detailed cost estimates are attached for your review. The project could be constructed in 2000 if plans and specifications are ordered by Febtu^. 2000. We would anticipate an early summer bid date and late summer construction if the project was constructed in 2<III We would be pleased to discuss this report further with the City Council or City staff at any mutually convenient time. Respectfully submitted. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Tom Kellogg I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Thomas P. Kellogg, P Date: Decembers. 1999.Reg. No. 26917 i ) j t ■r-r-rr.»*L* t ORONO. MINNESOTA LOCATION PLAN \ 13953105\CAD\0WC\ 13999105R1.0’.VG l/ll Bonestroc Rosene Andorlif^ & |\]| Associates £ttglht0 f» S A/cfiHicts COMM. 13559105 11/30/99 .,-«a i 13933105\CAO\OWG\ 1399910SELUR.OwG COMM. 13339105 n/30/99 EAST LONG LAKE SANITARY SEWER • GRAVITY OPTION PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE . *. ITEM y .••• • . * .* V.#*i ::UNrf : v ;UNIT • 4 • PRICE AST. QUANTrTY 8* PVC sanitary sewer Standard 4’ dia. MH MH overdeptn 8* X 4* wye 4* PVC service pipe Improved pipe foundation Televise sewer Mechanical trench compaction Submersible pump lift station 4* HOPE forcemain Connect to existing manhole 1 1/2" HOPE forcemain Residential grinder station Mobilization Bituminous surface removal Common excavation Geotextile fabric Class 5 aggregate base, 100% crushed Type 31 bituminous base course Type 41 bituminous wear course Bituminous material for tack coat Repair driveways Sod with 4* topsoil Meter manhole Long Lake sev/er connection charge LF EA LF EA LF LF LF LF EA LF EA LF EA LS SY CY SY TN TN TN GL EA SY EA EA Estimated Construction Cost >5% Contingencies *20% Legal. Engineering and Administration •l■5% Capitalized Interest and Bonding Total Estimated Cost 28.00 1.500.00 100.00 75.00 20.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 55,000.00 20.00 350.00 7.00 7.500.00 5.000. 00 2.00 6.00 1.50 10.00 32.00 35.00 1.50 750.00 2.50 5.000. 00 1.700.00 1,400 5 10 11 370 3,000 1,400 2,780 1 1,050 1 200 1 1 3,750 1,250 3,750 2,300 450 340 200 10 1,400 1 11 cliffi 539,200 7,500 1,000 825 7.400 3.000 1.400 2,780 55.C00 21,000 350 1,400 7,500 5.000 7,500 7,500 5,625 23,000 14.400 11,900 300 7.500 3.500 5,000 18,700 5258,280 12,914 5271,194 54,239 $325,433 16,272 $341,704 12/8/99 East Long Lake Gravity Sewer File No. 139-99-105 L EAST LONG LAKE SANITARY SEWER • RESIDENTIAL GRINDER OPTION PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE__________^___________a ITEM • -• V ^ r*0NIT. :UNIT ; -iW. PRlbE • GOAlbTOr 1 1/2* HOPE service pipe 1 1/2* HOPE service pipe-directional bore 2* HOPE forcemain-directionat bore HOPE service tee Curb stop Air release or cleanout manhole Repair driveways Bituminous street patching Connect to existing manhole Erosion control fence Mobilization Sod with 4* topsoil Trees Long Lake sewer connection charge Residential grinder station Meter manhole LF LF LF EA EA EA EA SY EA LF LS SY EA EA EA EA 10.00 20.00 20.00 50.00 200.00 2.500.00 750.00 10.00 2,000.00 2.50 5.000. 00 2.50 400.00 1.700.00 4.500.00 5.000. 00 Estimated Constnjction Cost •f5% Contingencies •f20% Legal. Engineering and Administration •f 5% Capitalized Interest and Bonding Total EsUmatad Cost 12/8/99 East Long Lake Pressure Sewer 100 160 1,700 11 11 3 8 350 1 200 1 4,000 10 11 11 1 ;E8TJ $1,000 3.200 34.000 550 2.200 7,^ 6,000 3,500 2,000 500 5.000 10.000 4.000 18,700 49,500 5.000 $152,650 7,633 $160,283 32,057 $192,339 9,617 $201,956 File No. 139-99-105 Public A ttendance Meeting D ate □ C ouncil □ PLANNING C ommission □ Park C ommission □ Other _____ -'"PtJE^ (• m THE r INF0R>IAT10N ”;^WQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CnY RECORDS • : ■ ^ ■ • • ■■ V.. ’ ■ ; NAME (please print)ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agec NAME OR NinVBER //'•••./7 i/ f-/'Z ,'r: r.; ■if 'd P, 2, J ■'^>1’ A '^C\ J ?T^Vv .A a \U Hi/i/ clcs ujp.<r. tC\ 13. 14. XAAPfS ‘»>%WTW^HTDOCS‘JORMS\FClUC^TT Comment Card Public Information Meeting on 12/1/99 • • r.rf; r, 1999 East Long Lake Sanitary Improvements Project No. 139-99*105 ^^.,.;jrOnOMO Please write any comments on this form and leave at the Meeting, or mail to. City of Orono Public Services Director P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 Name: Lois’ Address: G . kcoc) hOr, '^SSC(/ Comments: t ■ f rnXm Comment Card Public Information Meeting on 12/1/99 East Long Lake Sanitary Improvements Project No. 139-99-105 Please write any comments on this form and leave at the Meeting, or mail to. City of Orono Public Services Director Comment Card o’ ^ Public Information Meeting on 12/1/99 n 1999 East Long Lake Sanitary Improvements Project No. 139-99-105 Cll Y O.* •^♦*40 Please write any comments on this form and leave at the Meeting, or mail to. City of Orono Public Services Director P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066 V,™. /?-/e Address: LrJy^& j2cV Comments: t.vlP AJ^C i' ^r/. A^n ^/2y A/T)^y/^ y /.aW^c/ jj I/ ^ JAyfS.j '^rvoi^ - Lw ./T»v*-»■ -!•• II iT—r i-r~~ ^mmii Ji •111 ------r^ei- n - —'—-«*■ «- - - Comment Card 7 Public Information Meeting on 12/1/99 East Long Lake Sanitary Improvements Project No. 139-99-105 r-cO n 5 )ccc C:« V x-r Or.o;, " Please write any comments on this form and leave at the Meeting^ mail to: City of Orono Public Services Director P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Miimesota 55323-0066 Name: . Address: L oJOl Comments: /It. nnul/ Siu^J W Jyj/^ j • % •• • ■ • •• •• I-.9 990 Old Long Lake Road Wayzau, Minnesou 55391 (612) 473-7979 December 28,1999 Mr. Gregg Gappa Director of Public Services City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Mr. Gappa: This letter requests exclusion of my properties at 900,965 and 990 Old Long Lake Road from the proposed installation of a pressure sanitary sewer ^stem in the East Long Lake area, due to the fiict we recently spent Ivge amounts to have conforming septic systems at these locations. Thank you. Sincerely yours, Bruce B. Dayton ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13» 1999 COlJwnii r/ipetiNQ ROLL CALL ^ ^ C>TY OF Ohui^u The Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Gabriel Jabbour, Council Members Richard Flint, Bob Sansevere, Charles Kelley, and Barbara Peterson. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Services Director Greg Gappa, City Attorney Tom Barrett, Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Zoning Administrator/Planner Paul Weinberger and Recorder Lanette Wolf Mayor Jabbour called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA (#1) APPROVE/AMEND Items 5, 8, II, 14, 17, 19, 20, 24, 25,26, and 27 were added to the Consent Agenda. Item 4 was removed from the Consent Agenda. Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. INTRODUCTION OF NEW FULL-TIME POLICE OFTICERS Chief Cheswick introduced the new full-time police officers, Jeff Johnson and Tony Wittke, to the Mayor and Council Members. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE BY IRENE SILBER Ms. Silber introduced Gary Welsh of the Saga Hill Preservation Society. Mr. Welsh presented a plaque to Mayor Jabbour from the Preservation Alliance of Minnesota recognizing the efforts of those preserving a substantial amount of land in the Saga Hill area as park land. (#2) 2000 LEVY ADOPTION HEARING - ADOPTION OF 2( TAX LEVY BUDGET AND A. ADOPT FINAL 1999 TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2000 - RESOLUTION NO. 4396 B. ADOPT 2000 GENERAL FUND BUDGET - RESOLUTION NO. 4397 C. ADOPT THE 2000 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS BUDGETS - RESOLUTION NO. 4398 Moorse said this is a request for the Council to take final action on the Year 2000 budget and ta.x levy. He said that in August the Council went through a series of work sessions to develop the budget, they adopted the preliminary levy and budget in September and that tax levy was Page 1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U2) 2000 LEVY ADOPTION HEARING - Continued reflected in the tax statements that residents received. A Truth in Taxation Hearing was held on December 6th. Jabbour said that no residents attended the Truth in Taxation Hearing. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 4396 Adopting the Final 1999 Tax Levy Collectible in 2000. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 4397 to Adopt the 2000 General Fund Budget. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, a motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 4398 to Adopt the 2000 Special Revenue Funds Budgets. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (•#3) REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22,1999 Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of November 22,1999, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#4) TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING OF DECEMBER 6,1 Sansevere said the minutes should be corrected to note that he did not attend the Truth in Taxation Hearing on December 6,1999. Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the minutes of the Truth in Taxation Hearing of December 6,1999, as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nay 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - IRENE SILBER, REPRESENTATIVE Silber informed the Council that Susan Wilson has decided not to seek reappointment to the Park Commission. Silber said that the estimates received for refurbishing Navarre Park were far higher than anticipated and the Park Commission is prioritizing to find the items that would have the most neighborhood impact. They will center their priorities around playground equipment and an accessible path up to the equipment. They are also seeking alternative sources of funding. Jabbour complimented Silber on the Park Commission members ’ innovation in trying to obtain the City ’s goals and objectives with a very limited budget. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - LIZ HAWN, REPRESENTATIVE None. Page 2 ---- ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 PUBLIC COMMENTS None. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (#5) #2418 RELEASE OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FROM CRYSTAL BAY PRESERVE - RESOLUTION NO. 4399 Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to approve and adopt Resolution No. 4399 Releasing Lots 1 Through 8, Crystal Bay Preserve from Resolution No. 1757. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#6) #2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC, SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 6 AND WILLOW DRIVE, CLASS HI SUBDIVISION, PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WILLOW VIEW This item was continued on the agenda. (#7) #2540 BRADLEY HOYT, 2523 KELLY AVENUE - AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Rick Sheridan, Continental Property, and William Skoinick, Esq., represented the applicant, Mr. Hoyt, regarding an application for a Conditional Use Permit at 2523 Kelly Avenue. Weinberger stated that Mr. Hoyt filed an application for an After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit. The application is a result of a request made by the City of Orono to bring the property into conformance as there was some work completed on the property without contacting the City about permits to complete some retaining wall work. Staff had told the applicant that the non-permitted work could be remedied by applying for a conditional use permit or he may have to restore the property. Consequently, the applicant agreed to apply for after-the-fact permits which included a conditional use permit and variances for the retaining wall work on the property. Weinberger displayed an existing survey of the conditions on the property. Weinberger said this is Minnetonka lakeshore property on Kelly Avenue. It is a triangular, narrow lot with somewhat of a steep grade from the building area on the property down to the lakeshore. A boulder retaining wall is shown on the current survey. Sometime in September of 1999 Mr. Hoyt requested a conditional use permit application. The application was completed and brought into the City of Orono on October 1. Staff at that time had determined the application for a conditional use permit was incomplete. Staff had requested some additional information that included survey work showing conditions of the property prior to any construction on the lot and also requested surveys and as-builts for the property as the construction was completed. The applicant submitted the current survey on October 29th and stated there was no other information available. Staff had also requested Page 3 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U7) #2540 BH4DLEY HOYT, 2523 KELLY AVENUE • Continued information regarding cut and fill calculations to determine the amount of land alteration on the property. Although the property owner stated he had not done any land alteration at that time, it is staffs belief that land alteration had occurred simply because building a retaining wail in most cases would require some land alteration. The retaining wall and slope area are located within 75 ’ of the lakeshore. Weinberger stated the code requirements for granting a conditional use permit in this case would also require approval of variances. The variances required would be for hardcover within 75 ’ of the lakeshore. The applicant has not submitted an application for a variance. Weinberger said the notices for the public hearing before the Planning Commission did note that variances were being requested because staff felt the application for variances would be submitted; however, the variance application has not been submitted up to this time. Weinberger cited the three sections of the code that would require variances in order for the retaining wall to be approved. Section 10.22, Subd. 2, Section 10.55, Subd. 8, and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L). Weinberger said this application is only for the retaining wall. The Planning Commission reviewed thii; application on November 15th and recommended denial of the application for the Conditional Use Permit based on not having enough information to proceed with the application. They did not have an application for variances to review. The applicant’s request did not meet the requirements of the code; therefore, the Planning Commission was not in a position to make a recommendation of approval. The Planning Commission commented that additional information such as photos and information from the contractor would be helpful. Weinberger said that typically, if a resident were to make an application for the work that was completed on this property prior to it being an after-the-fact situation, staff would have required a current survey showing all existing grades on the property, a survey showing the proposed topographic changes, additional engineering details on the walls, and a drainage study. Weinberger said that staff recommends the application for an After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit be denied or, if the applicant requests, to table and revise the application. He requested that the applicant provide a variance application for the hardcover within the 75 ’ lakeshore setback, additional information regarding the property conditions prior to construction of the wall such as plans submitted to the contractor, photos and site survey, and information relating to the contractor and plans the contractor used for the project The information that the contractor would have used would be very important in determining hardship on the property as well as the impact of the conditional use permit. Jabbour stated that filing an application for a permit does not ensure it will be approved. Rick Sheridan stated that Mr. Hoyt is present at the meeting. Sheridan said he wanted to clarify some points from the staff report. He referred to the first paragraph of the report which Page 4 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U7^ U2540 BRADLEY HOYT, 2523 KELLY A VENUE - Continued states, “Consequently the applicant has applied for the necessary permits for the boulder retaining wall." He feels this is a statement that his client has applied for all the necessary permits for the boulder wall which is contrary to Weinberger's assertion that Mr. Hoyt has not applied for the variance. Jabbour asked if Mr. Sheridan was reading from the most recent staff report. Sheridan agreed that he had received the most recent report. He referred to the Background section of the report which states, “Mr. Hoyt had requested a conditional use permit application." He said that is an incorrect statement. Hoyt came to the City Offices and asked for an application for the necessary permits the City was requiring that he have for his property. Sheridan said his client maintains that he didn't need any permits or variances for his property. Sheridan referred to a letter that was sent to Mr. Hoyt in response to his application that indicated that more information was required. That letter said the information was requested for consideration of the conditional use permit and variances. They supplied the survey that is being displayed and told Mr. Weinberger that, at that time, they did not have in their possession a pre-existing survey. They didn't say that there wasn't one available, but that they didn't have one in their possession. Sheridan said it is their position that they have made all the applications that are required. Sheridan referred to the second paragraph on page 2 of the staff report regarding the action taken by the Planning Commission. He feels the entire paragraph is inaccurate. The next paragraph says the Planning Commission offered the applicant an opportunity to revise the conditional use permit application to include variances, but went on to deny the application. Sheridan said he does not understand what the basis for denial was. He does not agree that they were offered an opportunity to revise the application. He does agree that they were offered an opportunity to come back with a variance application. Sheridan said his client maintains that he has not regraded within the 75' lakeshore setback or filled the shoreline with rip rap, which staff says his client has done. Sheridan said he would like to discuss the issue of the conditional use permit. He and Mr. Barrett had a discussion about this application and that Mr. Barrett told him one of the conditions of the conditional use permit is getting a variance for hardcover. Mr. Barrett said that iuisstates their conversation. Barrett said Hoyt could apply for a conditional use permit. The condition that is set out with respect to the retaining wail is that such permit is subject to the other prohibitions and regulations of the City Code and other applicable statutes and ordinances. As it stands, Mr. Hoyt’s application is in violation of several salient city ordinances. Most specifically. Section 10.55, Subd. 8, says “Except as Page 5 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 U2540 BRADLEY HOYT, 2523 KELLY A VENUE - Continued specifically permitted, no hardcover, temporary or permanent structures.... shall be permitted on any land within 75 feet of the ordinary high water elevation.” He asked if Mr. Sheridan understood that. Sheridan said he understood, and also that Mr. Barrett was drawing the conclusion that the retaining wall is hardcover. Barrett said he is drawing the conclusion that it is a temporary or permanent structure or hardcover. He asked if Mr. Sheridan denies that it is a permanent structure. Sheridan said that based on the City Code's definition of what a structure is, yes. Barrett asked if he denies that it is hardcover. Sheridan said that is correct. Sheridan said the City is asking for his client to apply for a conditional use permit and some variances. He said that a conditional use permit and a variance are two different government actions that can be taken with respect to use of property. He read to the Council from a case that the Minnesota Supreme decided regarding what a conditional use permit is and its affect, Chanhassen Estates v. City of Chanhassen. Minnesota Supreme Court, 1984, which states, **By express designation as a conditional use in a particular zone, such a use is deemed consistent with the public health, safety and general welfare and consistent with goals of the comprehensive plan of that municipality. Until the district is rezoned or the zoning ordinance is either amend^ or successfully challenged, that determination is conclusive.” Sheridan said Orono ’s conditional use definition says that conditional uses are permitted and, therefore, that a conditional use is a use permitted in a particular zone subject to conditions. A variance is an attempt by someone to come in and get a variance for a use that would not otherwise be allowed in a particular zone. He said you can’t have a permitted use subject to conditions and say that you need a variance for a permitted use. Barrett said the conditional use permit does not fall under the difficulties that Mr. Sheridan suggests. If you want a conditional use permit, all you need to do is v’ c.nonstrate that you are in compliance with the city ordinances and the city will grant one. If you wish a conditional use permit when you stand outside of compliance with the city ordinances, then it follows that unless you get a variance from those ordinances, you cannot have the conditional use permit and that is why the variance question arises. Sheridan said he disagrees for the reasons he has stated. Jabbour said the City asks someone that wants to put less than three yards of sand on their beach to obtain a conditional use permit. He does not feel it is out of line to ask Mr. Sheridan Pages ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U7) #2540 BRADLEY HOYT, 2523 KELL Y A VENVE - Continued and his client to present the City with information for a conclusive and accurate summary of the facts. Jabbour said he is obligated on behalf of the City and Mr. Hoj^ to perform due diligence because the conditional use permit must be filed on the deed for the land. He said the City needs additional information to make a proper decision. Sheridan said he does not know what additional information the City needs. He said City staff has been to the property and seen the retaining wall. He feels that is better than a drawing. Jabbour said the person that the City asks to get a conditional use permit for three yards of sand on the shore would be extremely disturbed if the City doesn ’t know how many yards of dirt Mr. Hoyt put behind the retaining wall, if the City doesn ’t know how far he went into the lake or if the City doesn ’t know if he obtained the appropriate permits from the Watershed District or the Corps of Engineers or the DNR. All of that is part of the C’iy’s due diligence. He said the Council could table this item and give the applicant a list of the documents necessary for the Council to make a decision. Sheridan said he and his client do not agree with that. He said the City has a current survey and a survey from 1990 prior to when the house was built and based on comparing those two surveys, staff has concluded that the applicant put rip rap in the water. He said that is an erroneous conclusion. He does not believe that the retaining wall is a structure or hardcover and there is a structural engineer present who will testify as to why he doesn ’t believe that either. Jabbour said tl' v should figure out exactly what the Council needs to facilitate the application. Sheridan said if Jabbour is going to ask his client to concede that the retaining wall is hardcover, they will not do that. Barrett said Sheridan is correct, that if he wishes to make a legal argument that the retaining wall is not hardcover, he can make one and the City will make a legal argument that it is. He does not feel it is fiuitfijl to make that debate since it is clear that the City’s position is that it is hardcover. Jabbour said there is a substantial amount of information that the City nexls. He suggested that the list be sent to the applicant in writing Sheridan said it should be contemporaneous with the decision they are making and not after- the-fact. Jabbour said this is a fluid issue and other issues might arise. He said the Council is trying to bring this after-the-fact issue into compliance or find out if it is appropriate for the Council to P^e7 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U7} U2540 BRADLEY HOYT, 2523 KELLY A VENUE - Continued grant the appropriate approvals. The only way they can do that is by knowing the facts. He said they ne^ to know who the contractor is, the amount of dirt moved, and the condition of the property before, during and after. Sheridan asked what the benefit would be of knowing who the contractor was. Barrett asked if the applicant takes the position that the entire retaining wall was built without moving any dirt on the property. Sheridan said he could not speak to that issue. Barrett said the reason the City would like to see the contract and to speak to the contractor is to find out what he did on the property. Sheridan said that assumes there was a contractor. Barrett said someone moved the rocks and the City would like to know who did that and how much dirt was moved. Sheridan said the City is telling his client that he has done regrading and presumably has done more than ten yards, so why doesn't the City tell them how it was done. Barrett said the applicant is being asked in good faith to submit the facts which support the application. Jabbour said the City could obtain the aerial photographs from prior years. Sheridan said the City has engineers on its staff and they can give the Council their calculations. Barrett said that does not preclude the City's right to ask the applicant for valuable information in his possession. That is what the City is doing and he asked why the applicant is refusing it. Sheridan said he would let Mr. Skolnick respond. Kelley said if the applicant is not willing to supply the information, he will make a motion for denial at this time. He asked Mr. Sheridan if he is willing to supply the information to the City. Sheridan said the information was supplied with the application. Pages ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U7) #2540 BRADLEY HOYT, 2523 KELLY A VENVE - Continued Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to deny Application #2540, from Bradley A. Hoyt, 2523 Kelly Avenue, for an After-the>Fact Conditional Use Permit. Flint said he is willing to look at further information if it is submitted, but he will vote in favor of the motion. Jabbour moved, Flint seconded, to table Application #2540, from Bradley A. Hoyt, 2523 Kelly Avenue, for an After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit. He requested permission for staff to visit the site in order to determine the information they need, he requested that staff send Mr. Hoyt a letter telling him what the City needs, and he requested that the applicant be given notice of a 60-day extension to act on this application. William Skolnick said he is an attorney for Mr. Hoyt in a lawsuit with the City of Orono. He said that when there is a request for information, there ought to be a good faith belief that the City needs the information and that they don’t have the information. He said the statement in the staff report that Mr. Hoyt has filled and extended the rip rap approximately five to ten feet into the lake is an outright lie. He said Bruce Vang, the City Inspector also said it is false in his deposition. He said Mr. Haffher also said it is not true. Jabbour said that most of the Council members are oblivious to the lawsuit. They know there is an action, but they don’t know what it is about. Skolnick said he does not believe that is the case. He said there has been correspondence between his office and the City ’s attorneys talking about Mayor Jabbour’s own deposition. Jabbour said he understands that. Skolnick said the Council is not oblivious to the lawsuit. Jabbour said he would like to go on record that most of the Council members know nothing about the lawsuit. Barrett asked Skolnick to specify the statement in the staff report that says that Mr. Hoyt extended the rip rap into the lake. Skolnick quoted, “The most recent survey indicates the slope has been regraded creating a flat area on the lakeside of the boulder retaining wall, and the shoreline has been filled to extend into the rip rap approximately 5-10 feet into the lake.” Skolnick said that is not a true statement. Barrett asked if Skolnick is saying that what is described there is not true, that the difference in the surveys doesn’t show that. Page 9 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (»7) U2540 BRADLEY HOYT, 2523 KELLY A VENUE - Continued Skolnick said the entire statement is not true. Barrett asked if Skolnick is saying there is no rip rap that has been extended five to ten feet into the lake on the comparative surveys. Skolnick said that is correct, that they have the sworn testimony of the DNR, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Mr. Hafher, who said he has no facts to support an allegation that Mr. Hoyt did anything or that the rip rap has been altered. Barrett said Mr. Skolnick is making two different statements. One is what his client did and the other is that there is an alteration. That is a disputed fact about whether there has been any alteration. Skolnick said he wouldn’t say it is a disputed fact. He asked who says it. Barrett responded that City’s staff says it. Skolnick said the City employee that was in charge of it, that made the claim, later admitted that he had no factual basis to make that statement. He said that the indication that the flat land between the boulder wall and the water was something that was done by his client is also not true. Barrett asked if his client changed the topography in order to install the wall. Skolnick said no and that they have engineers present who will tell the Council that that flat surface was there prior to Mr. Hoyt’s owning the property. He wants the record to reflect that there are some assertions that are not supported by anything. He said they are present because they asked the City what they need to do to satisfy the City. They were told to submit the conditional use permit application and it was done. The City requested additional information and it was submitted. The application was put on the Planning Commission’s agenda and then they were told that despite the agenda saying it was on a permit and variances, that it was only on the permit and, therefore, they really could not decide the issue because they hadn’t applied for the variances. His purpose in making a statement tonight is to get the truth out. He said his client did put boulders on the property, but he did not do anything else. Skolnick said that the people that have testified from the other agencies cannot tell them what is wr'>"g with the boulder wall or what code it does not meet. He said it is encouraged to put rip rap, to make sure there isn’t soil erosion into the lake and that is what has occurred. He said there has been a lot of information developed so far, including a visit to the property and an inspection by three of the City’s staff members and the City’s independent attorney. He said they walked the property and they were given free access to look, take measurements and take pictures. Page 10 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 i^2540 BRADLEY HOYT, 2523 KELLY A VENVE - Continued Jabbour said that some members of the Council are not aware of the litigation. He said that most of the Council did not know the content of the lawsuit or what issues are pending. Barrett said that because the applicants have suggested that they are unclear about the facts that the City seeks, he would support the Mayor’s motion that the matter be tabled and extended for 60 days. He asked that the City staff prepare a letter to Mr. Hoyt which lays out precisely what is required of him if he wishes to be successful in his application for a conditional use permit. It doesn’t mean that if he applies for the variances, that they will be granted. It does demonstrate what the City needs in order to evaluate the variances. He said he has a copy of the letter and he would be happy to give the letter to Mr. Hoyi or his attorneys at this time. He suggested that the matter be heard after better notice to the public and a reopened public hearing on January 19th for the purpose of having a public hearing in front of the Planning Commission with all the facts which the City believes are necessary. At that hearing the Planning Commission will make a recommendation and then the Council will make a final decision. Jabbour suggested that perhaps the City staff should change its way of writing reports. He said the report should refer to the land instead of saying that Mr. Hoyt filled in the lake. He said the applicant is probably right that no one can say that Mr. Hoyt physically took a shovel and started filling. He said the only thing the City has in its records is what was from the last application versus today. He said the City and the applicant can work together to obtain data between 1990 and 1999, such as aerial photographs, and if something has changed, then there is a problem with the land and the present owner is stuck with that problem. Until the City has all of the information, there is no way to make an educated decision regarding the land. Sheridan asked if the 60-day rule is being started over based on an incomplete application or if this is an extension. If this is an extension, he would like to know what the reason is. Barrett said the City will send him a letter pursuant to the statute which extends for 60 days the time within which the City has to make a decision on thiib matter. He said the letter he will give Mr. Sheridan now will suggest the information and the form the City needs in order to be certain that the variances are properly noticed and applied for. Sheridan asked why they are getting this information now and why they didn’t get it previously. Barrett said he does not know whether the applicant has willfully misunderstood the requests of staff or whether staff has misstated the requests. He said this letter will clarify the issues, the matter can go before the Planning Commission for proper consideration with the facts and it can go before the City Council for a final decision. That is the reason for the extension. Sheridan said he does not understand what is written by the City staff. Page 11 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U7) U2540 BRADLEY HOYT, 2523 KELLY AVENUE - Continued Jabbour said the state statutes ^ve the City the right to have 60 days, so they are not asking for any concession. Sheridan asked why they are getting a request for additional information now instead of in response to the application that was made by his client. Jabbour said that if Mr. Sheridan reads his own correspondence, it shows that the variances needed are to expedite the application and make sure that it doesn’t have to be readvertised. Staff did put the ad in the paper for the public hearing on a conditional use permit and a variance, hoping the applicant would present the information necessary to review the variances. Jabbour said that the applicant can continue or discontinue suing the city. The City will treat the applicant the same regardless of the lawsuit. Skolnick said he would like to believe the Mayor. Mr. Hoyt had offered to sign a document saying that if there is anything that needs to be done to fix this property, he would be responsible and post money to fix the problem. The City said they would not give him such a document and continued to threaten Mr. Hoyt with prosecution. Jabbour said he will get due process independent of the litigation. Skolnick said that hasn’t been their experience. Jabbour said again that the majority of the Council are totally oblivious to 90 percent what Skolnick is referring to in litigation. Sansevere said he was completely unaware of the lawsuit until the Planning Comimssion meeting, and he is not aware of the particulars of the lawsuit. Barrett said the application process is independent. If Skolnick wants to put information into the application process that he has garnered from depositions, he may do so. Sheridan asked if Barrett is suggesting that the information provided as part of the application will not be forwarded to the City ’s counsel in regards to the lawsuit. Barrett said that if the counsel for the City wants it, they can have it because it is public information. Liz Hawn said she would like to clarify the Planning Commission’s position. She said they were only dealing with the conditional use permit. As a practical matter, particularly because there was reference to storm damage which compelled the building of the retaining wall that had accelerated the erosion of the slope, they needed a reason to grant a conditional use permit because, generally, such retaining wall structures are not permitted in the 0-75 ’ Page 12 J ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U7) U2540 BRADLEY HOYT, 2523 KELLY AVENUE - Continued setback. She said in fact that retaining walls of this nature are referenced in the comprehensive plan as not being a desired alternative. Without compelling information presented to the Planning Commission suggesting that the conditional use permit should, in fact, be granted because of a severe circumstance of erosion that came as an act of God from this storm, they were not in a position to grant the conditional use permit or to grant variances when and if they should be proposed to them. This is why they would like information suggesting what the property was like before hand and what it was like afrer the storm. Unfortunately, if people choose to proceed in building in these areas without coming to the City, they destroy the very evidence that would compel the Planning Commission to believe that this was an appropriate action to take. It would be her hope that evidence suggesting that the shoreline was sufficiently degraded and that it needed help could be provided by historical surveys. Without such information, the Planning Commission is not going to be in a position to take a different position than the one which they have already taken. She said they need information simply to decide whether or not what they consider to be hardcover and have always considered to be hardcover in the 0-7S ’ setback should have been permitted. Mayor Jabbour said there is a motion to table seconded by Flint which supersedes Kelley’s motion to deny. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Break, 8:10 p.m. - 8;IS p.m. {tt6) #2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC., SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 6 AND WILLOW DRIVE, CLASS HI SUBDIVISION, PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WILLOW VIEW Dave Newman of The Bancor Group and Marty Campion, Project Engineer, were present. Weinberger presented the staff report. He said this application is for a subdivision of property with a conditional use permit for a Planned Residential Development for a 58-acre parcel which is located at the south and west comer of County Road 6 and North Willow Drive. The property is located just east of the new middle school property, to the west of the Shadowood neighborhood and to the northeast of the City Offices. It is located in the two-acre residential district within the MUSA where sewer service is available. The proposal is for 25 lots on 51 acres of dry buildable land which would maintain a one dwelling per two-acre density. The proposal was reviewed by the Planning Commission on November 15th and recommended for approval. A conservation easement would serve as a buffer zone around the proposed development. The Planning Commission recommended the developer amend the site plans to include a vegetation plan and berming plan that would help to buffer the development from the surrounding properties and provide for areas that would be more aesthetically pleasing and protect vegetation on the property. The trail plan would include a trail along Willow and along County Road 6. The only concern staff has with the location of the trails is it appears there may be some areas where the trail would be in the lowest portion of the ditch. Staff would Page U ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U6) U2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued recommend that the trail be moved to take advantage of the natural topography of the site to insure it is above where drainage areas and water would naturally stand. The trail does create a vital link along Willow and along County Road 6, especially to the school properties and to connect into the more regional system toward the Baker Park. Weinberger said the plan proposes a pressure sewer system. Pressure systems are usually only used when a gravity system will not work. Staff recommends that a gravity system be used because there is less concern for long-term maintenance. Weinberger said the City of Orono is requesting as part of this PRD that municipal water connection be made to the property. He said there are concerns due to public health and safety issues because many of the lots within the development are smaller than the standard two-acre lot. Weinberger said the City Engineer has reviewed the grading plan and it is, for the most part, acceptable. The City Engineer has recommended the lowest basement elevations be above the Normal High Level of the ponds and the exposed opening 2 ’ higher than the High Water Level of the ponds. The applicant has indicated that this can be accomplished. Another issue to be discussed is the concept of the road. The Comprehensive Plan states Private Roads shall have a maximum service of approximately ten residential properties and that they be maintained and owned by a homeowners association. The other alternative is a public road. The Comprehensive Plan would suggest a public road for this development; however, the City has not required private roa.'s in other developments become a public road, such as Sugarwoods. The road will serve this development only. Weinberger said the proposed lot layout indicates the lots to the northern portion of the development are on average smaller than those within the southwest portion of the property. Many smaller lots are located along County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. The lot layout would indicate that there would be a higher density of homes along County Road 6. Prior to recommending approval for the plat, staff would request that the City Council and the developers discuss the following issues; 1 The conservation easement be platted as a conservation outlot to be held in the ownership of the Homeowner's Association A conservation easement would allow a house to be built to the easement boundary, but the property owner would not be allowed to remove or alter any vegetation to the rear of 'he house. Platting the outlot would ensure houses would be built allowing a minimum setback to the conser^.'<^t*on areas. The lots are developed that would concentrate the least amount of higher density to impact the prOjjiCjties near the intersection of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North Page 14 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U6) U2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued 3. Municipal water service be installed on the site to eliminate the need for private wells and provide better lire protection to the site. The utility plans and easements for the Middle School property were adjusted with the expectation the Bancor site would develop with municipal water service. There are easements in place that would allow the two properties to connect. The City Engineer recommends extending the 8-incit water main north to the intersection of Willow Drive and County Road 6 for connection to the City of Medina’s water system. 4. Sewer service shall be a gravity system rather than the proposed pressure system. 5. A detailed drainage, ponding and grading plan, with drainage calculations be approved by the City Engineer. Weinberger said that Mr. Campion has provided these plans. 6. Trail easements shall be shown and dedicated along Willow Drive and County Road 6 and a future connection to the Middle School property. 7. The subdivider shall dedicate an additional 10 feet of right-of-way along County Road 6 per recommendations of Hennepin County. 8. Setbacks for lots less than two acres in size shall be: Front Yard Setback 35 feet Sideyard Setback 10 feet Rear yard Setback 30 feet Side Adjacent to Street 35 feet Newman said the current plan came out of the September Planning Commission meeting and suggestions made by the neighborhood representative. He said there are significant site constraints which make a PRD appropriate. One of the problems with the road is trying to design it around the wetlands. He displayed a drawing showing where the road mi^t be positioned without the wetlands. The wetlands are the reason the road is located so far east and the lots in the west are as big as they are. If they try to get ail the lots the same size, they would have to fill in a lot of the wetlands. Another constraint is the guidance from the City Council to hook up the road with Shadowood. Because this site is adjacent to property that is zoned medium density to the south, public property to the west and larger acre lots to the north, this is a transitional setting appropriate for a PRD. Newman said another issue to be addressed involves the benefit to the City. He believes the biggest benefit is the significant amount of open space. They are also proposing berming, easements for trails and planting of approximately 80 trees which are six to eight feet in height. He said Bancor does not object to using an outlot versus a conservation easement. There are a couple of lots where the lot lines would have to be adjusted if an outlot is used. Newman said he is concerned about using gravity sewer instead of a pressure system because a pressure system is less expensive. He said this is the end of the sewer line, so a pressure system should work. He said a more important issue is the public water versus private wells. He said they have made sure the homes will not be right up against each other. He said that their plans indicate a minimum of a 25-foot sideyard setback and they propose to make that setback part of the PRD resolution. This would ensure that the houses are at least 50 feet Page 15 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (H) U2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued apart. He docs not feel there is a public safety issue that would require public water. He said there is no public health issue because there will not be any private septic systems that c^ f«l. He said they do not think public water is appropriate and private wells should be allowed. If the City does require public water, he asked that the City not require them to extend the line further up to County Road 6. Steve Johnston, resident of Shadowood, said the neighbors have not had a chance to get together and review the revised plan so his comments are his own. He said he is not op^ to this plan. He is concerned about the road connection to Shadowood Drive. He said ttat Shadowood Drive is too close to County Road 6 and as southbound traffic tries to turn left into Shadowood, they have to wait for northbound traffic which stacks up in rush hour periods and blocks the intersection. As people wait to make the left turn, other vehicles come shooting across County Road 6. He feels a new road connection at that point will make the problem worse. He does not feel moving the new road to the south will solve the problem. He suggested that the new road be ended in a cul-de-sac with a trail connection for emergency vehicles only. Kelley asked Johnston how many cars make a left turn into Shadowood in the morning. Johnston said the problem is more in the evening rather than in the morning. Kelley said the light at 6 and 12 forces traffic up Willow and it stacks up there. Johnston agreed with the other staff recommendations. Matt Sanford, resident of Shadowood, feels the process is happening too fast and the neighbors have not had a chance to review the plan. He thought the neighbors would have a chance to work with the developer to talk about their concerns and that has not happened. Jabbour said that state law mandates the amount of time the City is allowed to act on m application. The deadline for this application is December 16, 1999. It is the developer’s choice to talk with the neighbors. Sanford said this plan is, ‘ing much closer to what the neighbors want, but they feel like ^ they are being pushed out of the process. He said he opposes the project because he doesn t have enough information about the project. Jabbour said he needs specific ideas from Sanford on what he would like to see in the project. Because this application is a PRD, there are many requirements that the City can make. If the applicant came back with an application for a subdivision writhout a PRD, the City would have less control. He said it would helpful for the Council to understand Sanford’s >nsion of what he would like the neighborhood to be. He said the City would like to keep a minimum footprint on the land and a PRD allows that. Page 1» ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (»6) U2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Kelley said there are only four houses that will front on Willow and that is appealing to him. Sanford asked if the developer needs a variance from the two-acre lot requirement. Jabbour explained that no variances are needed with the PRD. Sansevere asked if Sanford was concerned about the road being located across from Shadowood. Sanford replied that he is concerned about it because he thinks there will be a traffic problem. He said the area is not very well lit at night. Jabbour explained the types of restrictions that can be placed on the property with a PRD. John Grobe said he has lived in the area for four years. He said they moved to Orono because they wanted to live in an area that was rural in nature. He does not want to see curb and gutter or lights. He doesn’t want to see two-stoiy buildings. He would rather see one-story ramblers because the area is so flat. He thinks this development will become an eye-sore for the community and will devalue the property around it. Jabbour said that if people take the time to read the Comprehensive Plan, the City is not diverting from that plan. He said the City does not have frill control, but it does have some control. He said the applicant can choose to submit a plan for two-acre lots and they could build tall houses, plus two bams, plus a garage. Kelley said that where he lives today used to be a farm and there were no trees on it. Today, because of the houses that were built, people have planted trees that are now 16 feet tall. He said there is a pride in ownership and homeowners will plant trees. Jim Cox said he lives across the road from the project. He said he KAPds the neighbors ’ concerns about the road, but he doesn’t want the road moved to line up with his house. He said he does not oppose the project. He is concerned about the height of the houses. Jabbour asked his opinion as a fire fighter. Cox said he is concerned about the height of the houses and, as a fire fighter, he would like to see public water because it gives them greater ability to fight a fire. He would not oppose the cul-de-sac with an access. He said the height of the building and the way the dirt is pushed up to the basement are more of a concern than the road issue. Jabbour asked how long the road would be with a cul-de-sac Gaffron said it would be about 2,000 feet which is double what it should be. Page 17 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U6) U2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Flint asked if the cul-de-sac could be farther down the road. He said the road opposite Shadowood is a problem. Moorse said he doesn’t know if a cul-de-sac will be necessary, because if there is a problem with the traffic being able to get out of there during busy times, the residents will start going out the south exit instead. Kathy Johnston, 2335 Shadowood Drive, stud she is concerned about the safety of her children standing at that intersection waiting for the bus. She fears that the bus will only stop on one side or the other and her children will be forced to cross the road. Geny Pettis said he lives on Dickey Lake Drive and Ringers Wood. He is very concerned about the traffic on Willow. He asked if the Council is going to keep to the two-acre lot size. Jabbour said this property is zoned for two-acre lots. He explained that the land can be developed with a two-acre minimum lot size or it can be developed as a PRD. He explained that the developer gets credit for all the area in the conservation outlot and the street. With a PRD, the City can negotiate the terms of the development. This a 58-acre parcel and there will be 25 lots. Sansevere said he is concerned that the lots adjacent to Willow and 6 are small because they are the most visible lots. Campion said the lots on the interior of the loop could be made two-acres by sacrificing some of the area in Outlot A. Lot 1 south of the southerly entrance is over tw'o acres. He said that inside the loop, they weighed whether to create more outlot conservation area or increase the lot sizes. On Lot 15, in order to avoid an oddly configured lot that was one and a halftimes wider than it was deep, they chose a configuration that was nearly square. He said they could shift the size of the lots, but he isn’t sure what would be gained. Sansevere said it seems to him that aesthetically it would be closer to the two-acres that people seem to want in that area. Campion said that on paper they would be getting closer to the two acres. Aesthetically, if they are standing out in the street looking at it, with the open space, they won’t see the difference. Sansevere asked what type of houses they plan to build Newman said they haven’t designed homes for the individual lots. They will be upgrade homes and more and more upgrade homes are ramblers, but he would expect that some will be two- story homes. They were constrained in the layout of the lots because they were trying to work around the wetlands. PaSclS I ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U6) U2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Campion said that the building pads that they are proposing to construct will all accommodate ramblers. Kelley said he feels the PRD is an ideal solution for this land because of the topography and the wetlands. Flint said if you look at the area along Willow Drive, there are four lots totaling about 6.5 acres, but you have to look at the whole acreage and that puts four lots on 13 acres. He feels the PRD is a very good use of the property. Jabbour said the lot sizes could be increased by reducing the size of the conservation outlots, but that could push the houses closer to the road. Sansevere asked what the other council members think about the road issue. Kelley said there have been problems throughout the City with roads that don’t line up and headlights shining into homes. He said that if the exit to the north is a problem, perhaps it could be posted “no left turns” at certain hours of the day which would force the traffic to the south. Willow Drive is between two major roads. There will be even more traffic when the property to the south is developed. He said it might force a traffic signal at 6 and Willow. He does not feel the traffic issue should stop this development. He thinks the line up of the two roads is appropriate. Sansevere agrees with Kelley’s suggestion to limit access during peak times. Jabbour said if there is a big box development at Willow and Highway 12, the traffic on Willow will increase dramatically. This can be controlled through the Comprehensive Plan. Kelley said the Council has fought Mn/DOT long and hard not to put an entrance on Highway 12 and Willow. Initially, they wanted to put an access ramp on Willow and the new road and the Council fought hard because they didn’t want to force all that traffic onto Willow. The concept for Willow is that it is a neighborhood road for residential usage and the preliminary plan for Highway 12 does not have an entrance to Willow. Flint said that the private roads in Sugarwoods and French Creek are two of the nicest developments in Orono. If this road can look like those two, he is in favor of it being a private road rather than a public road. Jabbour said he is in favor of the private road. The other Council members agreed. Newman said the road is not a major issue. His concern is public water versus private vvells. Jaobour said he would like to see a gravity sewer system. Page 19 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U) U2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Gappa agreed with Jabbour. He said it would be wise to use a gravity system rather than burden all the homeowners with grinder pumps. Jabbour said he understands the fire department needing water in the area and it would be nice to have fire hydrants, but he does not have strong feelings either way. He does not feel it is the developer ’s obligation to run water to the next development for the City ’s fire protection. He said if the City wants to run it, so be it. The developer gives the City an easement and they will run it. If staff and the Fire Department feel there should be hydrants, perhaps a single main could be run for hydrants. Newman said there is a significant cost involved just to bring water to the site, even for one hydrant. Kelley said he does not feel the site needs public water, especially if they are willing to go to 25 feet on the side setbacks. Flint said he thinks it depends on how much it costs. He would like to see water there not only for this development, but because of other developments to the east of there including Shadowood. He doesn't feel it is a good decision for the City in the long term to allow private wells. He said he doesn’t want to spend the money, but perhaps there is a way to pay for part of it through the City system. Jabbour said that Mr. Flint is suggesting that if the benefit to the homeowner is the price of well, approximately $5,900, multiply that by 25 homes and if the cost exceeds that, perhaps we could work on a formula where there would be public water and the developer would not pay a lot more than the cost of a well. Newman said they are receptive and are willing to work with staff on this issue. He said their analysis is that the cost of public water would be greater than a private well by a reasonable amount. Jabbour asked what the cost would be to extend public water to the site. Newman said he does not know all the numbers because part of the cost is the City assessment that gets charged for connection. He knows what the total cost is for both sewer and water, but he not sure what the cost is without water. Jabbour said that Newman is saying that the City ’s cost of the water tower assessed to the resident will by itself exceed the cost of a well, not to mention running the physical pipe. Newman said the assessment for sewer and water is $9,200. Pi^c 20 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (»6) #2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Weinberger said he believes the water service was over half of the sewer and water connection. It was around 60%. Jabbour said the Council would be in terrible shape if they set a precedent by chan^ng the assessment. Kelley said that if the property to the south gets developed at a higher density, it definitely will have to have water. He asked if there is any way to tell the iiomeowners association that once the property to the south is developed, an extension would be run for a fire hydrant at that time. The cost of that hydrant would be assessed to the homeowners. Flint said it would be simpler to run it now. Jabbour said there would be no SAC charges, everybody would be on wells, but the City would provide a hydrant eventually somewhere halfway in between and this subdivision would pay for the hydrant. Kelley is saying that the line would be at the comer of this subdivision anyway and it would not cost a lot more money to run the line to a hydrant. He said there is no way to waive the homeowners ’ right to appeal an assessment. The City could come up with an estimate of the cost and have it be part of the development agreement so the money could be set aside now. Sansevere asked if there is an advantage to the City one way or the other. Moorse said there are significant benefits to the City in having municipal water there. The first one is fire protection. Sansevere feels it would be a selling point for the developer to have public water. Moorse said staff needs to get some more information about how much it would cost to bring water to the site in order to compare it to the cost of a private well. Then they can negotiate what amount the developer should pay to get water in there and is there an amount that the City is willing to pay because there is a general benefit. Flint asked Weinberger what the SAC and WAC charges would be if both sewer and water are extended to the development. Weinberger said the connection charge for sewer and water, just the connection into the system, is approximately $9,200 per unit. Flint asked about only the connection charge. Weinberger said he believes the SAC charge is $I ,050 per unit. Page 21 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U6) #2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Jabbour said the cost of running the pipes would be on top of the connection charges. He would be very uncomfortable setting any precedent because there may be commercial or high density developments in the future. Newman said he understands that having public water enhances the value of the lots. He said they would have to run the line approximately 1,300 feet just to bring it to the site. Early on in their discussions with staff they were told that it is not the policy of the City of Orono to pay to bring water to the site, so they never made that request. Jabbour asked how much it would cost to run the pipe to the site. Kellogg said it would probably be an eight-inch line. Jabbour said that’s $45,000. Kellogg said that where water was extended through the Middle School site, the City did acquire an easement from that line to the west boundary of this parcel with the idea that someday it would be extended to that point. The easement is in place, but the pipe isn’t. Jabbour said that based on what the City has done in the past, he doesn’t feel there is a need for public water. But, based on the way people are building their homes now and on the fire department’s report to the Council that there are times when they can’t even get on top of the houses and their tankers can’t carry enough water, he is starting to change his feeling and attitude towards public water. Kellogg said that when the City goes into existing neighborhoods to provide sanitary sewer, inevitably the next question they ask is when is City water coming. Sansevere said he favors City water. He doesn’t see a compelling enough reason not to have it. He doesn’t feel the Council should consider the developer’s cost in making that decision. Jabbour said the current style of houses dictates that the City have water available to fight fires. Kellogg said there is a possibility of bringing the line in at the southwest comer from the water tower area. He doesn’t know if it would be any shorter to come in that way. Flint said we know we will be e.xtending water along what will be Kelly Parkway because of what is planned for that area. Mr. Callahan said if public water isn’t put in now, the City should take the easements necessary to put it in later. Pase22 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (»6) U2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Gappa said the water is close to the southwest comer of the property because it comes off the water tower, goes east, then down the east boundary line of Public Works. Gappa said the water would be $5,810 per unit for the connection charge. That does not include running the water line. Flint said it sounds like the Council members are in favor of public water. He asked if the trail will be constructed as part of the subdivision. Newman stud they are willing to put the trail in if they get the credit for that against their Park Dedication fees. Flint said he would have to check to see what the City did on the Dickey property. Newman said he would expect to have a credit for the construction cost of the trail. Jabbour said the homeowners should be told that the City does not plow trails. Kelley asked about their plans to screen the lots on the west side from the new school where there will be baseball and soccer fields. Newman said they are planning to leave it open because there is a buffer zone there. The homeowners will probably do extensive landscaping. Their covenants require approval of the landscaping plans. Kelley said if the road is public instead of private, other people would have a right to use the road to get to the trails. Newman said they are showing a trail connection there. He assumes that if the trail is paid for with Park Dedication funds, it would be a public trail. Jabbour said that Kelley is saying that people would not have the right to be on the road to get 10 the trail if it isn’t a public road. He said the City should take an easement over the road too. Kelley said he wants to make sure because if he lived on the east side of Willow Road in Shadowood, his direct line to the baseball field would be through this development. Newman said there is another trail connection through Outlot A. Kelley said that kids from Shadowood are going to come across the street, into the private road and down the public easement into the school. Jabbour said there should be some language giving them the right to do that. Page 23 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U) #2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Newman said the trail can be dedicated as public. Weinberger asked if the trail could be extended in a different location. Newman said the only non-wetland lot line that they have is the one where the trail is located. Kelley asked how wide the trail will be. Newman said they are planning an eight-foot paved trail with additional easements. Kelley said the neighbors might object to the trails if they don’t know about them before they move in. That has happened before and the City vacated some trails. Newman said the key to it is to let the buyer know about the trail expectations on the front end. He said they would put the trails in when the streets are constructed so the neighbors can see them. Jabbour said the City vacated those other trails because they went to no where and there were other trails adjacent to them that came up all the way to the school and Baker Park. He said the City has no intention of vacating other trails. Sansevere said he doesn’t know if kids will actually follow the trail because it has a jog in it. Kelley said he is suggesting that the City take an easement so the trail can be on the roadway. He said the neighbors can put in landscaping that will direct kids toward the trail. Flint questioned the location of the trail. Jabbour suggested that a condition be approved by staff of a trail system that connects Shadowood to the School District. Jabbour said they should talk about the height of the buildings and he believes there should be no accessory structures allowed on the sites. Newman said he feels the building pads are large enough for big garages. Jabbour said there should be no outside storage except a licensed vehicle. Newman said they can address it in their covenants. Jabbour said the covenants can be changed and he wants it to be part of the PRD. Jabbour asked if they could divert from the ordinance and put in a “not to exceed’’ height. Page 24 I ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (M) §2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Kelley asked what if someone wants to put in a tennis court or a swimming pool? Jabbour said no above-grade accessory structures. Sansevere said what if someone wants to put in a gazebo attached to the pool area. He asked if they were trying to eliminate sheds. He asked if their covenants allow for a pool? Newman said yes, but he thinks the covenants would prohibit a gazebo. Jabbour said that above-grade accessory structures should be prohibited. Newman said the covenants could be submitted for review by st^ and that becomes one of the conditions the PRD. Jabbour asked again about the height of the buildings. He asked about the present permitted height. Weinberger said it is the average peak and its 30 feet, so essentially you could have a structure taller than 30 feet in height if the entire second floor would not be used as livable space. Kelley said he is not in favor of changing that. Peterson and Sansevere agreed. Jabbour said he feels public water should be provided. Newman said that then the Council should change its policy on helping the developer pay for bringing water to the site. Kelley said he has a problem with paying for 1,300 feet of pipe to bring water to their property. Kellogg said there is water available closer than 1,300 feet and this needs further study. Kelley said the City has to be consistent in its policies. Newman said they were advised by City staff that in bringing sewer to the site, they would be responsible for the cost of bringing it to the site. They anticipate paying for approximately 1,200 feet of line outside of their development. If the City changes it’s policy on paying for water, they should change it for sewer also. Jabbour said that if the City diverts from the current sewer policy, it would bankrupt the City. Page 25 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U6) U2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Newman said that all the other conditions are acceptable. He asked that the matter be moved forward and they be given a chance to work with staff on a cost evaluation and bring back a reconunendation subject to approval at the next Council meeting. Jabbour said the time limit does not allow it to come back again. If a fire hydrant is needed, he does not object to the City picking up some of the cost to run the line between two fire hydrants. Kelley asked if the PRD could be amended at a future meeting. Jabbour said the Council can require the public water now and change it at a later date. Newman said he wants assurance that the City will look at private wells instead of public water. Sansevere asked if Newman’s only objection was cost. Newman said yes. Jabbour said if staff says the City cannot live without them taking it all the way to 6 and Willow, and this development is self-sufficient with it being in the middle of the road, he thinks it is the City’s call if they want to either make them do it or pick up the tab for it. Kelley said he is in favor of the 25 ’ setbacks. He asked if they are planning curb and gutter. Newman said it would be a rural setting Kelley said there should be no lights. He asked if there would be monuments. Newman said there will be a monument and a median at each entrance. He asked that the City not put up any warning sign for the median. Kelley said he is in favor of this application. Sansevere asked if the Council needs to address the traffic controls at this time or if it would be subject to a study. Jabbour said since this will be a private road, it should be included now. Kelley asked if the City has the right to restrict right or left turns off from a private road. Barrett said the City could, but it would be just as easy to say in the PRD that the City reserves the right on the private road to control the left and right turns. Page 26 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U6) U2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC • Continued Kelley moved to approve and adopt a resolution Approving a Preliminary Plat and Planned Residential Development for Application #2522, The Bancor Group Inc., at the Southwest Comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North (WUlow View), subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Sewer service shall be a gravity system. Traffic flow on private road is subject to the reasonable regulation of the City. Municipal water service shall be installed on the site. Internal roads will be private, but there will be an underlying public roadway easement to the City. There will be no public lighting, except it may be necessary to light the intersection for the private road and Willow Drive in the future. Setbacks will be: Front Yard Setback 35 feet Side Yard Setback 25 feet Rear Yard Setback 30 feet Side Adjacent to Street 35 feet There will be trail easements along County Road 6, along Willow Road and east/west across the property from Willow to the Middle School property and over the private road. The trails are to be completed prior to constraction of any homes. The trail will be 8* wide bituminous with a 12* easement. There will be no accessory stractures above 6*, and only non-roofed accessory stractures are permitted. There will be no curb and gutter except at the entrance medians. Copy of the covenants must be approved by City staff. The conservation easement to be platted as a conservation outlot to be held in the ownership of the Homeowner*s Association. The landscape plan shall be subject to approval by City staff and the developer will post a letter of credit in the amount of 150% of the improvement costs. Trees will be planted along the private road spaced at every 40*. Kathy Johnston said she objects to the plans for a monument and median at the entrance because of traffic concerns and it will take away from the rural character of the neighborhood. Newman said he is willing to submit the plans for the entrance for staff review. Weinberger said that in the case of Carriage Hill and some other dev elopments, the monument signs that would go in would actually exceed the height allowed. He recommended that when a monument sign plan comes in, the Council shall review the plan. Flint asked if the Council can approve this in principle and have staff come back with a draft at the next meeting. He asked if the December 16 deadline can be extended. Page 27 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U) M2522 BANCOR GROUP, INC - Continued Barrett said there has been one 60 day extension by the City. Permission of the applicant would be required for another extension. Newman said he doesn ’t have a problem extending the time limit. Jabbour said the City would need something in writing regarding extending the time limit Kelley seconded the motion. Flint amended the motion to state that it is subject to staff drafting the resolution and presenting it to the Council at the next meeting. He asked if Newman would give his written consent to extend the deadline. Newman said he understands the process and he is willing to give his writtei. permission Jabbour said he would like the motion amended to state that the Council L giving approval based on these conditions, if written permission for an extension is nnt obtained. Flint and Kelley accepted the fiiendly amendment to the motion. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Break. 10:30 p.m. - 10:35 p.m. (#S) #2544 ALFRED AND MARILYN RICHIE, 905 TONKAWA ROAD - FINAL PLAT OF RICHIE ADDITION - RESOLUTION NO. 4400 Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to approve and adopt Resolution No. 4400, a Resolution Approving the Plat of Richie Addition. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#9) #2550 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - CLASS III SUBDIVISION Charles Van Eeckhcui af>plicant, was present. Weinberger presented the staff report. This application is for a seven-lot Planned Residential Development on property located at 120 Brown Road South. It is approximately a 20-acre parcel with approximately 14 acres consideied dry buildable. The current access to the property is via a private driveway easement across a property known as Tract G which is owned by Mr. John Dunn. The Planning Commission reviewed this matter at their last meeting and recommended by a vote of 7 to 0 to deny the request for this subdivision, conditional use permit and variances based on a request by the appli:;ant to move this item forward to the City Page 28 Ii ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U9) mSO CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - Continued Council. The Planning Commission was prepared to table this application as there was a lengthy list of issues to be resolved regarding this property. Weinberger said the application requires the following approvals: 1. A conditional use permit for a Planned Residential Development. 2. Road width variance and a variance to allow the road to be developed at less than the minimum requirements. Kelley said he would have a hard time approving this when the Planning Commission has voted 7 to 0 to deny the application. He would like to see what the rest of the Council members feel before Weinberger proceeds with the staff report. Sansevere asked Mr. Van Eeckhout if he has received any information from Mr. Dunn that he will sign the plat documents. Van Eeckhout said tnat Mr. Dunn has not signed the access documents. Van Eeckhout said his attorney has told him that he has all the legal access that he needs. He suggested that the City Attorney and his attorney work out the access question. Sansevere said he would not be comfortable moving forward unless it was clarifie-i. Van Eeckhout said it is clarified and that he has an absolute ability to access this property adequately. The worst circumstance would be a condemnation which the City has the authority to do. He said the City approved this access to serve this property and he bought it under those circumstances. He feels this is a legal issue, not a planning issue. Jabbour said Van Eeckhout should expect the elected officials to be very up front with him. He said the Council members are uncomfortable acting on this application. Jabbour said there is a difference between having an access to several homes versus a private easement for one home. Flint asked if access could be from the north for lots I, 2,3 & 4. Van Eeckhout said it was the general consensus on the part of City staff and his marketing people that access from the north would not make as nice of a community, but it isn’t impossible. Flint said that perhaps some of the problems with the 30 percent inclines resulted because of the direction of the access. Van Eeckhout said this application has had some dark shadows cast over it from day one. One of those shadows are the 30 and 40 percent grades. He said they are strictly fictitious and Page 29 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (#9) #2550 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - Continued there are no 30 and 40 percent roadway grades anticipated. He has a layout that shows they can serve all the lots with seven percent grades Flint said that validates Kelley’s point, that the work has not yet been done at the Planning Commission level that allows the Council to decide on the issues. Van Eeckhout agreed that the Council should not override the Planning Commission. He said this is a difficult process and he does not want to change the plans based on individual suggestions. He again stated he does not feel there is an access problem and it can be worked out between the attorneys. He said the main issue that the Planning Commission raised is the size of the lots in the north portion of the property. The Planning Commission said those lots were too small, but they would not make any kind of commitment regarding the size of lots they would approve. He is reluctant to do detailed road design when he doesn’t know where the road is going to be and he is reluctant to do detailed sewer designs when he doesn’t know where the lot lines will be. He wants direction from the Council before making changes. He sai^'* he told the Planning Commission that he is comfortable with a 24’ road width and he doesn’t understand why the City wants a wider road because it will create more hardcover. He said that in light of what they talked about at the Planning Conunission, he came up with a new plan which the Planning Commission has not seen. He presented a new plan with more open space. The new plan would eliminate all the creek crossings. Sansevere said he was present at the Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Van Eeckhout had queried each Commission member on issues that Sansevere thought should have been dealt with at the staff level. Van Eeckhout said the staff will not give him the information. Jabbour said that the Council members want to have a thorough understanding of the project and Mr. Van Eeckhout should work through the Planning Commission process. Regarding the access, the City doesn’t usually go through other people’s land for a road. Kelley asked if this project should be included in the MUSA line. He said there has been an assumption that the City will bring sewer to this property. Jabbour said that assumption was made by the Council when the applicant asked. Sansevere said he is uncomfortable with the fact that Mr. Dunn has not signed the plat documents and dedicated the easements in favor of the City of Orono. He arked Barrett if that is something the City must wait for before acting on this application. Barrett said he would recommend that the Council make the PRD conditioned on demonstration of access or the proper title. He said he would give an opinion on the title and if the applicant doesn’t have proper title, then he can’t nie the documents. Page 30 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (#9) #2550 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - Continued Dave McCoskey, 130 South Brov^m Road, asked how the easement questions can be resolved. Jabbour said that is between Mr. McCoskey ’s and the applicant ’s title companies. Jabbour said the City cannot act as Mr. McCoskey ’s agent. McCoskey said he does not want the development. Jabbour said the applicant has the right to develop the property. McCoskey asked if the access issue controls the whole layout. Jabbour said it can be approved subject to access and it will be up to the applicant to get the access. Douglas Coleman, 140 South Brown Road, asked if the development of the property is dependent on sewer. Jabbour saio there must be sewer for this project. It would be hooked up to the Long Lake part of the sewer. The cost of the sewer will be paid for by Mr. Van Eeckhout. Coleman asked about the impact on the stream that runs from Long Lake to Minnetonka. Jabbour said there are shoreline management ordinances that the applicant has to adhere to. There are restrictions up to 300 feet from the creek. Weinberger explained some of the restrictions. The original proposal contained a crossing of the creek for a driveway and the sewer would have crossed the creek. Van Eeckhout said the new proposal eliminates those crossings. Kelley asked about the building envelopes and perhaps there isn ’t room for seven lots. Van Eeckhout said the only problem would be the sewer and there is legally room for seven lots. He showed where they would be located. Jabbour asked what the Council wants, a standard subdivision or a PRD. Kelley said he believes it should be developed as a PRD because of the topography. Van Eeckhout said the Planning Commission was hung up on the size of the lots in the north and that is what Van Eeckhout objected to. He said he had guidance from staff on the size of those lots. He said staff felt the size of the lots waj appropriate from a transitional point of Page 31 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (m) mSO CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - Continued view. He is trading the small lots for all the open space on the south end. He said that if the Council likes this concept, he will go back to the Planning Commission. Flint said he prefers the new proposal over the proposal in the staff report. Sansevere asked why the applicant doesn’t make the lots bigger. Van Eeckhout said the best building sites are in those four spots. Jabbour asked how the neighbors feel about the new proposal. Weinberger said there is dry buildable area around the lots in the north that would expand the size of the lots, but the Council should keep in mind the lots io the north of this area in Long Lake are zoned and platted for a 10,000-15,000 minimum size. He said this design maintains all four sewer connections in the same area. He said that originally this was shown using the entire development as part of one of seven lots. Now the applicant is showing open space. The entire area to the south just north of the Luce Line Trail is shown as open space which is really almost four acres dry. This also addresses many of the issues the DNR had with the drive «vay and the sewer crossing of the creek as well as the issue of the sewer line crossing the Luce Line Trail. These are some of the things that the applicant discussed with staff. Kelley asked how everyone feels about the flag lot. Van Eeckhout said he lives on that lot. Coleman said this plan is better than the previous one. Kelley asked why the flag lot was so narrow at the top. Van Eeckhout said it is basically just a driveway at that point. Flint asked if the open space would be deeded to a homeowner’s association. Van Eeckhout said that would be subject to agreement between his attorney and the City ’s representative. He would not object to deeding the open space to a homeowner’s association. Jabbour said he wants the applicant to understand that this proposal will be subject to the access. Sansevere asked if Mr. Dunn is agreeable to sign the documents. Van Eeckhout said Mr. Dunn is in Florida, but he has talked to him once. He said Mr. Dunn has been paid twice for the easement and he wants to be paid again. Page 32 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEEITNG MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (U9) U2550 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - Continued Kelley said he would like to send this matter back to the Planning Commission. He doesn’t have a problem with the size of the four lots in the north. He would like to have the outlot combined with lot 7 so it is a two-acre parcel. He feels it needs to be connected to sewer because the Comprehensive Plan includes protection of lakes and waterways and there is a waterway through this land. Jabbour told Mr. Van Eeckhout that this matter will be referred back to the Planning Commission and he asked staff to send the applicant a notice for a 60-day extension. Sansevere asked if there were trees on the western portion of Lot 7. Van Eeckhout said Lot 7 is totally wooded. Kelley said the setback could be increased as part of the PRD. Kelley moved, Sansevere seconded, to refer Application #2550 for Charles Van Eeckhout, 120 Brown Road South, back to the Planning Commission and directing staff to send Mr. Van Eeckhout a 60*day extension. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#12) HIGHWAY 12 PRELIMINARY LAYOUT - RESOLUTION NO. 4403 Moorse stated that this is a resolution approving the Mn/DOT adopted preliminary layout for Highway 12 and a letter to go along with the resolution laying out the objectives of the City as the process is continued to the final design phase. He reviewed changes to the resolution. The Design Review Committee members reviewed and commented on the resolution and the letter. Sansevere said he objects to metered ramps. He asked if that can be addressed at this time. Moorse said it is addressed in #7, Objectives to be Addressed. Kelley asked about the lighting on the bridges. Jim Murphy said that in the final design there will be a considerable amount of discussion about the Idnd of lights that go on the bridges. Kelley said he walked the corridor and he feels there will be a lot of headlight wash as cars that are westbound on the new road go underneath Old Crystal Bay Road. He said that Mn/DOT should do something to eliminate that headlight wash. Murphy said he will look at the cross sections, but he thinks the highway will be lower than the railroad by two or three feet all the way through there. Page 33 r ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13» 1999 (ni2) HIGHWA Y12 PRELIMINARY LA YOUT - Continued Moorse said there is a question about the first sentence of the letter that states “approved the corridor for the upgrade of Highway 12 without restrictions.” Flint said the words ‘^without restrictions” should be removed. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4403 to Approve the Trunk Highway 12 Adopted Preliminary Layout Plan, as amended, and to authorize staff to send the letter to Mn/DOT, as amended. Jabbour thanked Mr. Murphy for his work on the Design Review Committee. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT None ENGINEER REPORT (#10) POLICY ON COST ALLOCATION FOR SEWER PROJECTS Kelley recommended that this matter be discussed at the January meeting. Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to table the Policy on Cost Allocation for Sewer Projects until January. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#11) EAST LONG LAKE SEWER PROJECT A. ORDER FEASIBILITY STUDY - RESOLUTION NO. 4401 B. RECEIVE FEASIBILITY STUDY AND SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION NO. 4402 Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4401 ordering the preparation of a feasibility study for the East Long lake Sanitary Sewer Project and to approve Resolution No. 4402 accepting the feasibility study and scheduling a public hearing for the East Long Lake Sanitary Sewer Project for 7:00 P.M. on January 10, 1999. VOTE: Ayes S, Nays 0. Page 34 1 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 CITY ADMINISTRATOR ’S REPORT (#13) PUBLIC WORKS SITE EXPANSION - EMINENT DOMAIN OPTION Jabbour said he heard this parcel of land will be proposed for development in the near future. Jabbour asked Barrett to comment on the condemnation procedure. Barrett said there are essentially two methods of proceeding to condenm property in Minnesota. One is a quick take by which you announce that you will get title within 90 days and that you have put some percentage of the value in the bank against an appraisal. After 90 days the City gets the title and it is irreversible. There can also be a more general condemnation which commences the condemnation action. The court appoints commissioners, the commissioners set a value, the value goes to the court and the City can withdraw from that procedure at some point. But the Council members should be aware that the downside of that is that if the procedure is discontinued, the City would have to pay the other party’s costs and attorney ’s fees. Flint said perhaps the Council could authorize Moorse to start the proceedings without actually filing for a general condemnation. Kelley asked why ti:e City would not want to do a quick take. Barrett said the City would have no control over the price of the land. Jabbour said the Council should authorize staff to start the condemnation proceedings and to send a letter to the property owner to tell them the City is about to proceed with this condemnation. The Council also instructed staff to contact the School District regarding the purchase of land north of the City’s property. Barrett suggested that the Council direct staff to prepare a resolution authorizing the taking of this land. Kelley moved, Peterson seconded, to direct staff to prepare a resolution authorizing the acquisition of Outlot B, Willow Properties Addition through the eminent domain process. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#14) PARK COMMISSION REAPPOINTMENTS Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to authorize staff to place a news release in the local newspapers requesting candidates to serve on the Park Commission. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 35 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETLNG MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (#15) COUNCIL LIAISON TO PARK COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS IN 2000 Flint said he will not be available to attend the Park Commission meeting on March 6 or the Planning Commission meeting on February 23. He asked if any of the Council members would want to trade dates with him. Sansevere said he would attend the March 6 Park Commission instead of the May 1 meeting. Jabbour said he would attend the February 23 Planning Commission meeting instead of the June 19 meeting. (#16) DECLARATION OF LOCAL JURISDICTION RE: ISTS Kelley recommended that his matter be discussed at the Januaiy meeting. Jabbour moved, Flint seconded, to table Declaration of Local Jurisdiction RE: ISTS until the January meeting. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#17) FORMAL OPENING OF NORTH ARM LANE AS PUBUC ROAD - RESOLUTION NO. 4404 Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4404 Declaring North Arm Lane Open as a Public Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#18) 4220 WATERTOWN ROAD • RIGHT-OF-WAY BUILDABILITY CREDIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4405 Gaffiron noted that the correct address is 4220 County Road 6. On October 28 Council directed staff to draft appropriate documents by which the Cit>- would enter into a binding agreement with the Hannings in regards to future area credit for the right-of-way taken from their property for the County Road 6 upgrade. Specifically, such an agreement would allow the use of said right-of-way as area credit toward the S-acre area requirement should the Hannings wish to subdivide in the future. Gaftron said the City Attorney has suggested that a 'Yesolution of intent to enter into an agreement” is a logical first step toward resolving the litigation between Hennepin County and the Hannings regarding the value of the land taken for right-of-way. Jabbour said he didn't think the Council could bind future councils to this type of agreement. Barrett said he is not sure what the final form of this agreement will be, but the City is trying to give them some indication that it is amenable. Sansevere moved, Kelley seconded, to approve and adopt Resolution No. 4405, a Resolution of Intent to Enter into an Agreement with the Owners of Property Located at 4220 County Road 6. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 36 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (•#19) APPOINTMENT OF FULL-TIME POLICE OFFICERS Peterson moved, KeUey seconded, to approve appointment of Jeff Johnson and Tony Wittke to the full-time police officer positions effective January 1,2000 at starting pay rate level of $14.41 per hour plus benefits. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#20) APPOINTMENT OF FULL-TIME COMMUNITY SERVICE OFHCER Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to approve hiring of Ronald Hendricks as a full-time Community Service Officer at a pay rate of $10.69 per hour with full benefits. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#21) SCHEDULE WORK SESSIONS Moorse said that to continue to move ahead with the update of the Comprehensive Plan, the Council needs to schedule additional work sessions. He suggested 7:30 a.m., January 6th and 13th, and 5:00 p.m., January 10th and 24th. Flint said he would not be available on January 13th. Moorse said he will schedule the work sessions for 7:30 a.m., January 6th, and 5:00 p.m., January 10th and 24th. (#22) REQUEST TO ESTABLISH INSURANCE FUND - RESOLUTION NO. 4406 Moorse said this is a request to establish an insurance fund that would be used to fund the cost of the City’s insurances. This fund will be able to absorb differences in insurance costs. Each year the fund will be reviewed during the budget process. Flint asked if this will use up the surplus for this year. Moorse said no, that the City has been receiving a substantial amount of dividends for the last five or sLx years that will be transferred to the new fund. This fund will help even out any significant cost increases or decreases from year to year. Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4406 to establish Insurance Fund, an Internal Service Fund, as of January 1,2000; to authorize operating transfer of $123,900 from the General Fund to the Insurance Fund, and amend the corresponding transfer in or out budget of each fund by a like amount, effective January 1,2000; and establish the Insurance Fund 2000 budget for expenditures of $135,685, and for revenues of $135,685. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 37 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (#23) LETTER OF INTENT TO PURCHASE SQUAD CARS Moorse said the purchase of three new squad cars is in the 2000 budget. Staff likes to get out a letter of intent at this time of year due to the restrictive number of vehicles being built. Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to authorize staff to send a Letter of Intent to Purchase Three 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Squad Cars to Superior Ford. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#24) APPOINT AUDITOR FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999 Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the appointment of the audit firm of Malloy, Montague, Kamowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. to perform the required audits for the 1999 fiscal year records at an estimated cost of S20,160, plus direct expenses. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (•#25) 1999 INTERFUND TRANSFERS AND LOAN PAYMENTS Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to approve the interfund loan principal and interest payments to the Building Capital Outlay Fund from the 1998 Sewer Construction Fund of S352,530, and from the Water Operating Fund of $56,390, effective December 1, 1999. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#26) AUTHORIZATION TO DISBURSE CITY FUNDS FOR CLAIMS RECEIVED Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to authorize the City Treasurer to disburse City funds in payment of claims received for the December 27th Council meeting, which has been canceled, and that such paid claims be presented for formal approval at the January 10,2000 Council meeting. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#27) CHANGES IN UTILITY BILLING LATE FEE POLICY Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to amend the penalty for late payment of utility bills from - 15% after 45 days from the billing date (applied only to the current quarter) to - 8% after 30 days from the billing date (applied to the total unpaid balance); and to include this change in the ordinance adopting the City*s Fee Schedule for 2000 and Summary Ordinance for publication. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#28) 2000 MEETING SCHEDULE Flint questioned having a City Council meeting on February 14th. Peterson moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the 2000 schedule as presented. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 38 ,» ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13,1999 (ni9) 1999 MARINA LICENSES Gaflron presented the staff report. There are five applications for marina licenses and staff recommends approval of the licenses. Petenon moved, Sansevcre seconded, to approve the issuance of 1999 Commercial Marina Licenses to Windward Marina, King*s Cove Marina, Sailor*s World Marina, North Shore Marina, and Lakeside Marina. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT None. (*#30) LICENSES Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, a motion to approve the following licenses: Kennel L. James Marier, Jr. 2775 White Oak Circle On Sale 3.2 Beer Lakeview Golf of Orono, Inc. 405 North Arm Drive Off Sale 3.2 Beer Orono Public Golf Course 265 Orono Orchard Road O’SuUivan’s 2420 Shadywood Road O’Sullivan’s U 3340 Shoreline Drive On & Off Sale 3.2 Beer Navarre Lanes 3435 Shoreline Drive VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#31) BILLS Peterson moved, Kelley seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds Account VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 39 » REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^OlJMcii MEETING JAN 0 1 2000 CITY Oh OhO/vo DATE: 1/6/00 ITEM NO = y Department Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2522 The Bancor Group Inc. Southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North (Willow View) The Council approved the preliminary plat for the Bancor Group, Inc. to develop the 58 acre site at the southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. Staff has drafted an approval resolution to be adopted by the City Council. Council Action Requested To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR WILLOW VIEW LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 6 AND WILLOW DRIVE NORTH PID 28.118-23 44 0001 FILE NO. 2522 WHEREAS, Bancor Group, Inc. (hereinafter the "subdivider") on August 18,1999, filed an application with the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") requesting rezoning, a comprehensive plan an^ndment, conditional use permit and subdivision for a property located at the southwest comer of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North with the City for property legally described as: That part of the East Vi of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 28, Township 118, North Range 23 West of the Sth Principal Meridian lying Southerly of the centerline of County Road No. 6 as recorded in Book 70, page 3844152 in the office of the Register of Deeds, Real Estate Division, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono's Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 20, 1999, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, The Orono City Council on November 8, 1999 (Resolution No. 4372) denied rezoning the property from RR-IB to R-IA and a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the land use designation to permit one dwelling unit per acre density; and Page I of 11 WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on December 13, 1999 the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the subdivider noting the following findings of fact: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. FINDINGS The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. The property contains a total of 58.43 acres of land, with 51.89 acres being dry buildable. The Municipal Code permits, by conditional use permit, subdivisions to develop as a Planned Residential Development (PRD). PRDs are available to land subdividers subject to Council approval, as an alternative to standard minimum lot size subdivision of land. The purpose of this plan is to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation of natural open spaces, to counteract the effects of urban congestion and monotony, to provide cohesive structure to neighborhood design, to offer recreation opportunities close to home, and to aid in improving the welfare in general of City residents. On May 23, 1988 the City Council adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2. Amendment 2 was a result of a land use study along the Highway 12 corridor. The area ea.st of Old Crystal Bay Road, north of Highway 12, south of County Road 6 and west of Willow Drive was guided for two acre density single family homes. The Comprehensive Plan states the wetlands and natural vegetation in the area provide an e.xcellent transition between the more intense use planned for the south and single family 2-acre to the north. Utilizing this as a break, the area to the north shall develop with one dwelling unit per two acre density. The property is 51.89 acres dry buildable allowing 25 dwelling units to maintain the guided density for the rural residential district. Page 2 of 11 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. The property is within the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA) allowing for the provision of sanitary sewer service. Sanitary sewer service provides the subdivider to develop the lots without identifying septic sites on each new lot, one the factors in requiring the two acre minimum lot size in the rural residential districts. Developing as a PRD allows the property to develop at the required two acre density, one dwelling unit per two acres. The conservation outlot is established for the preservation of the natural open space along County Read 6 and Noith Willow Drive. The conservation area will accommodate four storm water ponds for rate control for the purposes of removing pollutants and other nutrients from the water before leaving the site. A trail easement will be granted to the City over the conservation outlot and developed as shown on the site plan. A trail connection through the property shall be developed to connect the neighborhood to the Orono School property to the west. The private road, platted as Outlot A, will serve all 25 lots within the development. No individual lot shall have access to Willow Drive North or County Road 6. The proposed storm water management plan will include construction of ponds on the site. A MCWD permit is required for the grading, storm water management and erosion control on the site. 12. The lots shall be subject to the following setback requirements: 35 foot Front Yard 35 foot Rear Yard 25 foot Side Yard Except Lots 1 and 15, Block 1; Lot I, Block 2; and Lot 1, Block 3 shall have a 50 ’ side yard adjacent to street (Willow Drive North) setback to preserve the standard side yard adjacent to street setback. The requirement is for all structures, to protect the standard side yard adjacent to street setback in the RR- IB zoning district: Page 3 of 11 L. and Lots 13, 14 and 15, Block 1 shall have a minimum 50' rear yard setback to maintain the standard setback within the RR-IB zoning district. 13.It may become necessary to place a light at the intersection of the private road and Willow Drive North. The City reserves the right to install a light within the Willow Drive right-of-way if the Council determines it is necessary. 14.Subdivider shall be granted credit for park dedication fee for cost of trail improvements within the development as the trails are a public amenity and provide for connections to greater trail networks. 15.The subdivider has proposed a/an entrance monument(s) within for the private road. Subdivider shall be advised an entrance monument plan requires review and approval by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application and conditional use permit for Bancor Group, Inc. be approved per preliminary plat drawings by Martin P. Campion, a registered engineer of Otto Associates Engineers and Land Surveyors, Inc., dated 12/3/99 .subject to the following conditions: 1.The final plat shall indicate the area shown on the preliminary plat drawings as a conservation easement as an outlot. 2.The conservation outlot(s) shall be protected by granting of a conservation and flowage easement to ensure the outlot(s) will not be developed, and drainageways and stormwater retention ponds are protected. 3.Setbacks shall be shown on a revised site plan to be submitted with the final plat. 4.Subdivider shall install a gravity sanitary sewer system to serve each of the lots. The sewer service shall be from the south and installed along Willow Drive North. Detailed sewer plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to final plat approval. Page 4 of 11 4 i 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Subdivider shall install niunicipal water service. The developer shall work with the City to determine the most appropriate service to the site. Water shall be extended to the north property line, at County Road 6 to allow future connection when water service is required to the north. Detailed plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to final plat approval. The private road, to be constructed within Outlot A, shall be developed to City requirements (Section 11.33, Subd. 4) for private roads serving 25 units. Code requires a SO' platted right-of-way, and the minimum paved width of the street to be 28 ’. The cul-de-sac shall be platted 1(X)' in radius with a minimum paved radius of 80' The private road will be constructed with rural sections, except curb and gutter will be used in the entrance median at the intersection of the private road and Willow Drive North. The private road in Outlot A shall be constructed to City private road requirements, subject to a Developers Agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Private road construction can begin as soon as the engineering plans for the road as well as stormwater management plans have been approved by the City, the Developers Agreement has been executed, and the final plat has been recorded with Hennepin County. The private road shall be privately owned and maintained per the appropriate access easement/maintenance documents to be executed by the developer. The developer shall create a homeowners association for such ownership and maintenance. No building permits will be issued until the private road base work and all stormwater management improvements have been completed by the developer and approved by the City. The developer shall grant to the City an underlying Road and Utilities Easement for Outlot A. The PRD approval requires Staff approve the restrictive covenants that will apply to the development. Page 5 of 11 13. 14. 15. 16. 18. 19. Restrictive covenants shall include a provision to prohibit above grade accessory structures over 6' in height. No such accessory structure shall be roofed or be located within any street yard or closer to the front lot line than the principal residence. Final plans shall indicate locations of all sewer and water easements. Trail easements shall be granted over the conservation outlot(s), the private road and between lots 7 and 8, Block 1. Final trail plans shall be submitted for approval by Staff prior to final plat approval. A 12 ’ trail easement shall be granted in favor of the City of Orono between Lots 7 and 8, Block 1. 17. The lots shall be subject to the following setback requirements: 35 foot Front Yard 35 foot Rear Yard 25 foot Side Yard Except Lots 1 and 15, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; and Lot 1, Block 3 shall have a 50' side yard adjacent to street (Willow Drive North) setback to preserve the standard side yard adjacent to street setback. The requirement is for all structures, to protect the standard side yard adjacent to street setback in the RR- IB zoning district: and Lots 13, 14 and 15, Block 1 shall have a minimum 50 ’ rear yard setback to maintain the standard .setback within the RR-IB zoning district. A final landscaping plan shall be submitted and approved by Staff prior to final plat approval. The plan shall be substantially in conformance with the site plan dated 11/23/99 by Martin P. Campion, a registered engineer of Otto Associates Engineers and Land Surveyors, Inc. with additional planting on Lots 12 and 13, Block 1 to screen the future residential lots from County Road 6. Subdivider shall plant boulevard trees along the private road per the requirements of Section 11.60, Subd. 2. Page 6 of 1 1 i f i___ 20.Subdivider shall construct stormwater management improvements generally as shown on the Preliminary Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan dated December 3, 1999 subject to any revisions of said plan as may be required by the City Engineer. A final Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan must be approved by the City Engineer prior to final plat approval. Subdivider shall grant drainage easements over all drainageways and stormwater ponds within the plat. 21.Subdivider is hereby advised that the City will not grant final plat approval until the MCWD has approved all grading and drainage improvements on the property. 22.Subdivider shall grant Flowage and Conservation Easements over City protected wetlands and show the wetlands as a ‘drainage easement’ on the plat. 23. Payment of standard Park Dedication Fee per City ordinance. 24.Subdivider is hereby advised that preliminary subdivision approval will expire one year from the date of Council preliminary plat approval. Should the subdivider fail to complete the filing of the final plat application within the year deadline, it shall be necessary for the subdivider to file a new preliminary subdivision application with the City. Final Plat Submittals: The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as follows: 1.Record plat drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies (one copy for the City’s records and one for filing with Hennepin County) and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to include: a.Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Martin P. Campion of Otto Associates Engineers and Land Surveyors, Inc. dated December 3, 1999. b.Dedication of drainage and utility easements 10’ wide along the exterior boundaries of property and 5 ’ along the internal lot lines. r'jge 7 of 11 c.Designation and dedication of drainage easements over detention ponds and drainageways as shown on preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan. d. Designation of Outlot A to serve as a private roadway. e. f. The naming of plat as WiUow View. Designation and dedication of trail easements over the conservation outlot, Outlot A and between lots 7 and 8, Block 1. g. Copy of protective covenants. 2. Legal documents required: a.Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b.The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c.Signed and executed Developer’s Agreement and letter of credit for approved site improvements, landscaping and construction of private road (Outlot A), stormwater and drainage facilities, etc. d.Signed and executed easement for the outlot to protect the land from future development. e.Signed and executed Drainage Easements to be taken over drainageway and detention areas within plat. f. Signed and executed Flowage and Conservation Easement over the conservation areas and wetlands within the development. g. Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over Outlot A. Page 8 of 11 1 ,rk£-^. •TTTiTTiI'J January 7,2000 To: Mayor Jabbour and City Council Members From: Greg Gappa Subject: City Water Service for Willow View Subdivision, Bancor Group City staff has met with representatives from the Bancor Group regarding City water service for the Willow View subdivision. This issue was discussed at the December 13"’ Council meeting. At this meeting, the Council granted preliminary plat approval based on City water being provided for this subdivision. City staff was directed to prepare a preliminary plat approval resolution and work with the developer regarding the City water service. 8"/4*' Water System Design One of the primary reasons for the installation of city water in this subdivision is for fire protection. There was Council discussion concerning the design of the water system needed to provide fire protection. The developer has presented a proposal to install a combination 8"/4" water main system that would provide an 8" line with a fire hydrant in the center of the subdivision. Four inch lines would be installed to serve the remaining lots in the subdivision. City staff reviewed this proposal and has some concerns regarding this system. This design results in a 1,100' distance from the fire hydrant to the furthest house which is not acceptable. We are recommending that an 8" line water system, with hydrants, be designed to serv e all of the lots in the subdivision. This design provides for better fire protection and is the accepted standard for City water service in most Cities. There is a neighboring Lake Area City that has 4" water lines in their system, and in a recent fire situation these small lines did not provide adequate water for fire fighting. North Si South Water System Extensions The City policy is that developers need to construct and pay for the necessary infiastructure to serve their development. For future planning purposes, the City would like the water system extended to the north and south property lines of the subdivision. There was discussion on funding of the water main extensions to the subdivision property lines. The developer’s position is that the cost of these extensions should be paid for by the City because they are not needed to provide water service to the subdivision. The City staff recommendation is that the extensions to the north and south will benefit others, and that the City should pay the additional costs that the Developer will incur for these water main extensions. II An 8” water system is adequate to serve this development. Staff also recommends that the City evaluate the Highway 12 water system to determine the possible need for a 12” water main through this subdivision to develop a higher capacity loop in the system. Currently the main water supply from the tower is only an 8" water main along Old Crystal Bay Road and Highway 12. Any costs to upgrade the water main size through the subdivision should be a City responsibility. We will review this situation and make a future recommendation to the Council on this issue. Water Main from the Middle School to the Subdivision Property Line Approximately 800* of water main are required to connect, from the subdivision west property line, to the new 12” water main installed behind the new middle school. The developer has questioned the funding for this line. The developer believes that this line serves a larger City purpose as it provides an opportunity for system looping and future service to others. He also believes that the water service access charge, of $5,510 per unit, should provide for water service to the property, not 800’ distant. City staff is recommending that the City and that Developer each pay for Vi of an 8" line because both parties are benefitting from this water main. As previously discussed, a 12" line may be required for higher capacity system looping, and the City should be responsible for these additional costs. :! ... « I ■ fill?'' * ^ra in < (S IM in ^75 (SJ^ » «r © A y I iffVJ CuWcOST •5 1 /-/fSfc. • 1 I ■I kliSis.-* ’■-. 06t I -J '^-»'v--_-i' (bancor. I t • */ * •• I R3:-: • •1 iw 1 •- i f ,ri- \ 1 jfR.0P05AL I $ ''0 « ... * I Ylli A-. iJ. - ;#r I 'j.>' z\ <iV © 'V^ I .•, 2/ J/CA-IS rr- I. IS* %,I« •Vi •« 1 f»..' ' 'll • •••* *•• •• * y - . ..»• »>*i .t**r - , . u .«.> '.if? ^ j •. • * I I-H «£ ■%. i ' 5^ I«-*: « « •rA'K t. r IS I \J» %^Ns. j 1 •T 1 -..y Tr-^—utiIT-.-iju <! n < (S 0 (S>__ (2? (S><*«»• (0 ,flop'-8* - -4%«€4?y- W7 >. I'IMKK I' ~ LvfcrJioV^*^ r -FW .V,; •» ,, .1 ySQOt^t'.'"V-- J w ^ L)a utiLtl^ P'^ir.'Ar L •10 untni rsMT -I ; O CS>' \v • • •• > . i «-# est:iT"13 \ ... <j 2 ^ 4 ‘ N{ :!*■ •** ‘!l'* 3te? •:r?. ' ^ i s t,.^v 6j» ISI5H X\ m, ij $ •av" RJK f /t^Vi « •• •• ^'*• \ ♦/3 © : o • •. <q> ! 1 1 « rC; iSTAFf fe.FCOMMFMDATtON ; •- ^0 ’- i’ "0f \^.(S9.i •yLz ©. !:C: •>‘- T " <S3’i rV''t.Mll»T.Uni 11=1-5 /-...»^^ f.---------'gOVf^M -rt >-t I t J T |.<n ,i L :<s> {‘i5P / .V.-. 'i-i *■•• i ■r V . 1 'm- I * rV (23) *^=-^VJ^.TrT7'V • 1 . s. a? «-M 1 . I L ««-v-» «=- I '•^. VI 3^ m i fi8". ltl.l.f*l..>.-£. .ur~r t7-> aX^K T=»«-a».r. “. -rii»juir-i*r?!««Lli=■«’ •*** ^■-r«^^iL^..j-*m4wrn J t • The Bancor Group* Inc.04 Bancoi Januavy 5, 2000 Mr. Ron Morris City Administrator City ofOvono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Re: Willow View Estates. Dear Mr. Morris: .A.t the last City Council meeting when the Council granted pi*eliminaiy plat approval for the above community, there was discussion surrounding the requirement that we extend city water to the site. It was my general impression from the discussions that while we objected to this requirement and the Council acknowledged that tliis was not their general polic>', the Council did believe that there was a public safet>' benefit in making this requirement. I suggested at that time that I did not believe it was fair that we bo roqxiirod to be eolelj' responsible for the cost of: (i) bringing water to the site and (ii) over sizing the system so that it can service other properties. In response city staff indicated that they thought a location to connect to the water system could be located witliin fifty feet of our propert5^ Further, the Council suggested that prior to approving the formal written resolution next Monday night, I was ftee to provide a more formal cost estimate and that they would consider some assistance for tho.se over sizing costs th.sf. are required to benefit other properties. Since that Council meeting I have had our engineer prepare specific cost estimates for installing water at this site. I would like to briefly summarize those costa. As part of hia work you will note he has determined that the nearest source of water is in fact aypro.ximately 800 feet from our western propertj* hne. Area A.s$essments (2o lots x So,510) $145,250 Cost of extending watex* 800 feet from school to west property line $15,200 Cost of full water system with 8 inch lines as propo.sed by city engineer S115.440 (Please note that 1 have chaixged tho estimate to reflect S hydr.ants rather than 11) TOTAL $275,890 Unw M.F.. ZQ S15336icX9 0^:^! 0003/so/' ThU compares with the cost of assuming that water is within Hfty feet of the prox>eriy line and that we only need to run an 8-incb line to the middle of the site, that a hydrant would be located at this point with 4-inch lines then running to each Int where they would connect to a one-inch service. Area Assessments (25 lots X $3,510) ^ . a>i40,zeu Cost of limited 4 inch system I \f^ 0 &C\, > r |t^P $64.890 # TOTAL $210,240 $145,260 Attached are the estimates prepared by our engineer. You will note that the estimates for both systems include the cost of running the water line the 800 feet ixom the school property to our site. As a result I have deducted the sum of $15,200 from each of the estimates in arriving at the above calculation. I hope that this analysis is of sonio value and that by providing it to you in advance, our meeting Friday morning can be more productive. If either you or your staff have any questions they should feel free to contact Marty Campion (612-682-4724) directly. David P. Newman cc: Marty Campion 1•1 £0 aooMva 9i6S.36i2tr If:iX 000£/S0/ ...• ..• ••• •» . nui-1 Mfioo rA-v 4U f .•». PREI.IMINARY COST ESTIMATE WILLOW DRIVE PROPERTY ORONO, MINNESOTA THE BANCOR GROUP PROJECT NO. 992S6 JuDunry 3,2000 (25 Lota) mma’tinSl riLSfir?::li4" Watered Duct Iron Cl. S2 LJF.1900 15.00 28.500.00 S’* Watennain Duct Iron Cl. 52 L.F.1860 19.00 35,340.00 1 4" Oetc Valve and Box Each 2 500.00 1.000.00 1 Fire Hvdranc W/6'* Cate Valve and Box Each 1 1900.00 1.900.00 1 ” Corpomtion Stop Each 25 35.00 875.00 1 1" Curb Stop and Box Each 25 75.00 1.875.00 1 1" Type K Copper Pipe L.F.800 8.00 6.400.00 1 Granular Bedding Ton 700 4.00 2.800.00 8" X 8 ’ Wet Top (complete, kiduding gate volve) Each 1 1500.00 1.500.00 ?riT:r.T-.hirin'p;;VPiTp‘j5?n' c::.*<i<fcAlVs3 J. JrL' S 80,190.00 ft^KtroR. PROfOSAL INCUUDf5 ^IS.OOO COST fOt P.L. T b M TRFV to 32'*?d dCC't nz ■?i.t?:bi3T3 lr:il 0003/S0/T 00 MOW 17 j 3S Fa.1 !«]U 'v'!r ;*.V T. •v'- PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE WILLOW DRIVE PROPERTY ORONO, MlN>*ESOTA THE BANCOR GROUP PROJECT NO. 91>286 .lanuAiy 3,1000 (25 I.OM) »‘^f***' • . f.V.iums-.v Piierariffi 'CTKNjir'r.-t'. l.^PWCBi 6” WatennainDuct Iron Cl. 52 (hydrant leads) L.F.220 17.00 3,740.00 1 ft” \V?itcrmain Duct Iron Cl. 52 includes stuhS- to north & south') L.r.4900 10.00 93,100.00 1 8" Gate Valve and Box Each 5 650.00 3.250.00 I fire Hydiant W/6" Gate Valve and Box ____Each 1900.00 iSpoo.oa 1 r Corporation Stop Each 25 33.00 875,00 1 1'' Curb Stop and Box 25 75.00 1,875.00 1" Tvpe K Copper Pipe L.F.800 8.00 6.400.00 Oranular Beddinst Ton 700 4.00 2.800.00 1 8" X 8” Wet Tap (complete, including gate valve) ______ Each 1 ■ *: *i 1 km& 1500.00 1,500.00 ’ S 136J40.0» CTt.CC R.crn»AKK6NnAT\0U — cnv rt.v5 rot. EXT(M5toMs i WOWKC SOUTh 9" LIME SC^OftLlO f.L 9 ^ J 9i •/l »/i cnv .t?cdC'C'Nr-s 9ib3:ci3I3 li‘‘Ll ooo:/£ ux/iio/uu ifco; x±:*>o ritA HU< U M ^)iSwPb''wAT9'****QHOVB,MN 85311 4SIQ PROJECT__DATE A v4a»txj;LMji •' ! •'1 1• • i I i r • 4 ■ • ^ ... It i \ « ! ! ••« • • • • I • # • • ••------jL».CJ^ I------------------------------------------1_____.3 it.©' ’ ••• «•- •• • • 33 5vTd dOor m 9i6336iCI3 xr:^x OOOC/50/: Application Date: 9/22/99 Completion Date: 9/22/99 60 Day DeadUne: 11/21/99 Review date extension: 1/20/00 MEETING 0 1 2000 cirroFOHOivu REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 1/06/00 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2539 John and Becki Sundet 684 Tonkawa Road Variance Zoning District: LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area:29,500 s.f. (.68 acres) Exhibits: A Revised Site Plan (Received December 29, 1999) B Minutes of Planning Commission (October 18, 1999) C Planning Report (October 12. 1999) D Floor Plan E Elevations F City Engineer’s letter (January 5,2000) Application: The applicants have proposed to construct a new attached garage and a main floor master bedroom suite to the residence. A detached garage is currently located on the lot approximately 200 feet up the driveway from the residence and will be removed once the attached garage is constructed. The applicant seeks approval of a hardcover variance to permit hardcover in the 75 ’-250 ’ setback area, to allow 5,841 s.f. (39.26%), where 5,201 s.f. (34.96%) exists, and 3,719.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed. And approval of an average lakeshore setback variance to allow encroachment of 34* into the average lakeshore setback. The existing residence is 1,007 s.f., the applicants are proposing to increase the footprint area of the residence to 2,666 s.f., which is an increase in footprint of 1,659 s.f. Also proposed is to extend the driveway to add an attached garage to the residence. Staff was concerned about the potential drainage impacts created by increasing the size of the structure. The applicants have completed a drainage analysis on the property and have implemented a drainage system to attempt to alleviate drainage concerns. The drainage system includes piping stormwater around the house and driveway L to an infiltration system located on the lakeside of the residence. The infiltration area will be a rock bed that would operate similar to a drainfield site for a septic system. The City Engineer (Exhibit F) has commented on the proposed system and has requested additional information for review to ensure the system can be maintained and can successfully route stormwater for the time period the larger home remains on the property. The following variances are required: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover Requirements: Within 75'-250 ’ of the shoreline there shall be no greater then 25% hardcover. To permit a hardcover variance to allow 5,841 s.f. (39.26%), where 5,201 s.f. (34.96%) exists, and 3,719.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed. 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots, except this does not apply to stairways, lifts, landings, and lockboxes. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. To permit a variance to encroach 34' into the average lakeshore setback. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 7 to 0 vote to: Approval subject to submittal of a grading plan for review and approval by City staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff has met with the applicants on the site to discuss grading and drainage issues. The applicants have revised the grade of the driveway, landing, and provided ways for the drainage to flow around the residence. Staff still has some issues regarding grading and drainage. Please refer to Exhibit F, the City Engineer ’s letter. Staff has concerns on the amount of hardcover on the property and the reasons for hardship, therefore staff recommends denial of this application. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To direct staff to draft resolution for the January 24, 1999 City Council meeting. I Aai.L-. . . —. CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 ZONING FILE # 2539 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 10/20/99 TO:Katherine Taylor Homes 1665 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55356 COPIES: John & Becki Sundet 684 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING 10 /18/99 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commbsion recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below: NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Additional information is requested, as follows: New survey with grading shown for the driveway and surrounding area. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the November 8,1999 City Council meeting is October 25,1999. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (249-4600). Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: November 8, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. . T-i, n.1- 1 Ai ^ a’"fp jil> /inri''*TTTni "VTl'^lT" flUlTl I Ml* I W I’M Min l ini mil ■ IIM li TM iil 11 i i il i 11 ■ I» In »P 1^1 II 'PWl I l '» i« jii ii pin i .< ^egi.caa .i!nls( ORONO PLANNING COM\nSSION MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 18,1999 (/^2S38 Rob and Tori Jaffray, Continued) City Staff is recommending approvaPdr ^his application. Jaffray had no comment regaraing his application. There were no publid^omments. Motion b^^mith, second by Kluth, to recommend approval of Application #2538, 540paffett Avenue, granting of a variance for front yard setback to be 25 feet where SO feet i^4^uired to allow corstruction of a new roofiine. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#13) #2539 JOHN AND BECKISUNDET, 684 TONKAWA ROAD - VARIANCES, 9:04 p.m. • 9:31 p.m. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. John Sundet, Applicant, was present, along with Kathy Taylor, Builder. Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to construct a new attached garage and a main floor master bedroom to the residence. A detached garage is currently located on the lot approximately 200 feet up the driveway from the residence and will be removed once the attached garage is constructed. A variance to the hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback is required to permit 39.26 percent hardcover where 25 percent is allowed as well as a variance to the average lakeshore setback. Weinberger noted that the hardcover In the 0-75 ’ setback as well as the 250-500 ’ setback will be reduced with this proposal. City Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission review the reasons fr. hardship. Also, Staff has concerns regarding the grade of the driveway to the residence, wi^^ some grading being proposed to reduce the grade of the driveway to seven percent. Sundet remarked that the hardcover will be reduced in the 0-75 ’ setback as well as the 250-500' setback, with the structural coverage being limited to 10 percent where 15 percent is normally allowed. Removal of the garage near the roadway will improve the appearance of the property. Sundet stated the adjoining property neighbors have submitted letters of support for this application. Sundet staled the motivating factor for this application is the fact that his wife suffers from rheumatoid arthritis and they are attempting to relocate the master bedroom on the first floor. Katherine Taylor stated they are willing to work with Staff regarding the slope of the driveway, which could be reduced somewhat. Taylor stated a house located in this same vicinity v^th a similar driveway is proposing to do essentially the same thing. Taylor commented that some grading and retaining watts will be necessary with the regrading of the driveway. Lindquist Inquired whether the adjoining property owner utilizes their driveway. Sundet stated to his understanding the adjoining property owner utilizes his own driveway, but it b possible that he uses this driveway at times. Sundet remarked that access will be cut off. Page 15 4t --r I. • ORONO PLANNING COMIvnSSION MEETING MliNUTES FOR OCTOBER 18,1999 (#2539 John and Becki Sundet, Continued) Hawn inquired whether retaining walls will be necessary on both sides of the driveway. Taylor stated that they will need to do some grading on both sides of the driveway and that retaining walls will likely be needed. Taylor noted that they will be reviewing the hardcover in the 0-75' setback to see whether they may be reduced in the future. Lindquist inquired what the hardcover consists of in the 0-75' setback. Taylor stated that some timber edging planter areas and sidewalks are located within the 0-75' setback. Taylor stated that the existing deck does extend slightly into the 0-75* setback and that they would like the deck to remain. Weinberger stated that approximately 85 feet of the deck lies within the 0-75' setback. Hawn inquired whether the Applicant would be willing to reduce the size of the deck. Taylor stated that due to the construction of the deck, they would be unable to reduce the size. Hawn commented that the hardcover Is an issue in her opinion. Taylor remarked that the hardcover is being reduced in the 0-75' setback as well as the 250-500' setback. Sundet indicated that he would like to replace the stairway in the 0-75' setback, which will further reduce the hardcover in that zone. Stoddard commented based on the overall plan showing the reduction in hardcover in the two zones, he would be in favor of this application. Lindquist noted that the structural coverage is under the permitted 15 percent. Smith inquired whether the grade of the driveway needs to be addressed at this time. Weinberger stated that they will need to submit a survey prior to the City Council meeting for review and approval by the City Engineer, noting that the proposed grading work should not Impact the adjoining properties. Weinberger pointed out that a four foot retaining wail is permitted under City Code. There were no public comments regarding this application. Motion by Stoddard, second by Smith, to recommend approval of Application #2539, 684 Tonkawa Road, granting of a variance to hardcover in the amount of 39.26 percent in the 75-250* setback and a variance to the average lakeshore setback to permit construction of an attached garage and a main floor master bedroom to the residence, subject to the submittal of a grading and drainage plan prior to the City Council meeting for review and approval by City Staff. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. Page 16 tC TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator d FROM: DATE: Wendy Bottenberg, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner October 12,1999 SUBJECT: #2539 John/Becki Sundet 684 Tonkawa Road Variance — Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 Acre) Lot Area:29,500 s.f. (.68 acres) This application requires the following variances: Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L)(2): Lakeshore Hardcover Requirements: Within 75' to 250' of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. To permit a hardcover variance to allow 5,841 s.f. (39.26%), where 5,201 s.f. (34.96%) exists, and 3,719.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed. Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C)(6): Average Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots, except this does not apply to stairways, lifts, landings, and lockboxes. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. To permit a variance to encroach 34' into the average lakeshore setback. Application Summary: The applicant has proposed to construct a new attached garage and a main floor master bedroom to the residence. A detached garage is currently located on the lot approximately 200 feet up the driveway from the residence and will be removed once the attached garage is constructed. To permit a hardcover variance to allow 5,841 s.f. (39.26%), where 5,201 s.f. (34.96%) exists, and 3,719.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed. To permit a variance to encroach 34' into the average lakeshore setback. Staff has reviewed this application as an addition to the residence, not as a rebuild. #2539 John/Becki Sundet 684 Tonkawa Road Variance W/12/99 page-1 ANALYSIS Lot Area: LR-IB (1 acre)Lot Area Lot Width Side Yard Setback Required 43,560 s.f.140 ’10’ Proposed 29,564 s.f.85’11.8' Hardcover Calculations : Structural Coverage : Statement of Hardship : Distance from Shoreline Total Area in Setback Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0’-75 ’6,376 s.f.Os.f. (0%)1,287 s.f. (20.19%) 976 s.f. (15.31%) 75 ’-250 ’14,878 s.f.3,719.5 (25%)5,201 s.f. (34.96%) 5.841 s.f (39.26%) 250 ’-500 ’8,310 s.f.2,493 s.f. (30%)3,357 s.f. (40.4%) 1,550 s.f (18.65%) Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 29,564 s.f Allowed: 4,434.6 s.f (15%) Existing: 1,759 s.f (6%) Proposed: 2,883 s.f (10%) The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. U2539 John/Becki Sundet 684 Tonkawa Road Variance 10/12/99 page^2 i Issues for Concern: 1. The existing house was built in 1960. It was at that time located closer to the lakeshore than its neighbors. 2. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Planning Commission review the rea.sons for hard.ship. Also, staff has concerns regarding the grade of the driveway to the residence. The survey shows two walls as existing walls, which appears it is a rebuild. Katherine Taylor Homes did not return phone calls regarding this application. Attachments A Application B Site Plan/Survey C Elevation D Plat Map E Location Map F Average Lakeshore Setback G Hardcover Worksheets H Property Owner's List I Permit Record J Letters from neighbors U2539 John/Becki Sundet 684 Tonkawa Road Variance 10/13/99 page 3 Application # Date ReceK’ed Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee S250.00 (S50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 .? • I (no change from original application) Br-iitia ' Variance for non-conforming structures S2y.^b After-ir.:-Fact Fees (Double application fee) •• - ‘ -N 3 PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address-to &/lOK)0 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) -nn-f'C>\ I__________________ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired___________________________________________(month/year) I (do) (do no^also own the adjacent parcels of land. Presen^ttse of property: ^^residential ___^other (specify)______________________ Zoning District: L^-U3 'bc Lv. t .•'/vv'«r.jl___________________________ APPLICANT Phone flSiie^ Name ________ Phone (work ) ______ Address: M City: _______Zip: Nam^ Address: ^____^ Phone (home ) I - gt/KiC^ (Phone ^vork) rk) ’ V:«,. » 7;n- Bcis OWTS'ER (if different than applicant) CBOi^ f*r. Pig.. City: U*TPM|g^****^**^ Zip: Estimated Construction Cost $ ^oo y.DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: hL-Co^ MoRg in *iS-2SQ \fim\je armtsjfei^ • QptjjKi •z-So-Soo Zcue PtoM» Tg _________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) lifAw/4CaM6B- l^BoM VARIANCES REQUIRED I ‘ Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage \l^ — — — Setback: Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or imusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: G-AAACtG uocA’TtsX> PtPfit24y<> ^oo PTT \jp STtfgf^ pA2.iv/feW/W F)gjo>u t4ooie... LAjtSH TO Tt) rfe; VZen^C/JS ^ l>gS//2C Tt3 /W/lSrOTg SgX><gO<9M 50 PT To (attach additional sheets if necessary) FLoolt:.. UJ.ZU.KJ IS% o-^es/v^ HAHS>CO^. &rssP KTAtLe^^ LXi— 6 MINNETONKA # oif' /w o .-n\ <LJ> rilii iiiSj E ^ A Orawmgs aie Pkppaiy of: KMMriM Tqftai% Hoiat^ jMPwHWlHWf^rwyujt R«wiMnirtsT(E 4l7Sf fSO W.» V.' ' .$ <X 1^ A / V-; Plans & Drawings are Property o': Katharine Taytor*! HomM, Inc. Use Prohibited Without Consent Return All Prints To: KatherineTaylor (612) 475-1160 imilMMU n ir r II FT I fi ll It ■ ■■ X li H'iii■■ aai ■■ ■iniiiAJiMimiiiMi U W ^ *" eiiai iin;!!iii!!:iiiiiiil]!jllj!!y!liiijn^ Q r II o ■ a... ■j• ) • t‘ •:v.J Plans & Drawings a-e Property t ;• KathtrinfTtylor'iHomfMnc. Use Prohibit^ Without Conserrt Return All Prints To: Kalherino Taylor >612) 475-1 130 o # ^ O fQ) ^ * ' f*Cl.Plans & Drawings are Property Ksihwint Taylor’s Homes, Inc. Use Prohibited Without Consent Return Ai! Prints To: Kalherine Taylc! (612) 475-1160 I -fe WATZATA WOOON 0 ORONO WlARCm COPPfll- visoa S® 5 ^35 HIGH 3^ '•j eilkh TF •“Jet. $CHII8TIN£ or 1/ A cV V/*Vl.vv* •' ' > A > " Utt ST 4-..; .-it V ••• -P/»y-.: ^vC/ vS. ’A»> ”* ' . BATS WATERTOWtl M M lui MAT SOMERSET 0- WO 0 THOROUGH « lU 1?/oe35J^ ^ ^gCEWOPO^^^I Lu^Line BATSIBERO i V*- * Nor/i I . • —■ . t .*^* • - »: .. ■» L . t ,17, ? WHITE \ 400 DEVIHU L0R6VIEW cm A8M600M WAT ORO # lil O 800 OAHLRO m <SS< X / ~;-vMV • \ • ■ r. v.t ?••* 7 ••;’ -i- ■* • • • • / *•• • V:>J>v-;-?. gov ) •■:■ ;• >>>-/ ;• 't \ • ••t'.;j. • .. ■ . FRENCH LAKE RO c 9 V - * »A \ V • i*-**-***;* •' •*« * * ’ • * I '^ • '"A \ V V-* 4.:Vi _y *-\ 4 • . \ \ \ . • . • ; • •••J* A r :-~Ari7l .. *•-■*♦■ -‘Vv Vv~ ,•*■'{•■•*• ^-..rSs.:Jl:'-': - ‘:i i*<" A yr^rr-fy^ <• Lake >> \hort # t«f **r \ J600 %R0 iohns fOlMT^u - i* * » » •M A Crystal r mm • ^ • • ••"□2 V, ■•...•: -A ••* ■ * Bohns Point •' • V I • .•r ORON *«a 1600 •• • Bo,• % ^ • • #4 m Bay 1 Crystal Bay * Laftyet /-';••.* ^;^ounlry Cjub ‘ . y 60 3) FhI! to. I J7j -l-li? VjUl Ml . K -» — • • »■piDl'l : COFFUl i GFOtJEE'ij *. ??»T SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)O-TS’75-2sr;250-500- li l?rr U:13hI1 =- '77 500-1 COO’ftgv. 10'fi A ^yigriNO HARpCOVER IN ZOt^E A__Hpuse ...............—-------- Ungih W.iltx X X X 9 B. Garage C. Driveway .*0 Sldcwiik . E.. P.?ti9(P«.?K •• *• F. Undsctpe Underlain By PUsilc X .X X X .X X • • X X X S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. 5 p.-w/'0?C> tt'A S.F. S5 65 4^ L2Ji G. Other M •«*•*«• ••• • _ JS6 ■A •■ ■ -. _S.FrCcf*£> PAT/. ” fleet _ S.*'*s c.-.ar£a flyt. - J-J- »uo4;o»var ! $«F •«# - 'TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE . TOTAL PROPERTY AREA I.S* ZONE , * iLf.y B 6^7^___ X :oo = 1287 ZTTK 20, n S.F. S.F. % A B ypnPflj^Fn HARPrOVER yN ZONE A. • House __________ * Lcf\|ih Widih .B. Garage C. Driveway tftJOtS.- D. Sidewalk X X X E. Patio/Deck _____ J0CK i'fliJj- ••• ^ F.---tindsca?c Uodcrlain _ _________ X X X X X X X X XBy Plasticy/<j 4Y LA k c /A^CL . A G. Other _____________ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _____________ - ^ ------- S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. .S.F... S.F» 4.<0 S.F. S.F. _____S.F. Q i S.F. S.F. ’ S.F. S.F. S.F. ?7^ S.F. X too €37€± S.F. /S. 3 l A B G (^b> *P:DM : 'ICfF in C CiFC>n=crij . HARDCOVER ^/rj setback ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 0-:t. 1> Iff? li:i TV 250.50C f-eu <30-1000' f^lcT.Nr. HARProVER ir< Z0:i£ A. House _Wiiir. X \ X B. - Garage C. Driveway X X . D- SWewallc X X X X F. Landscape Underlain ■ ■■ By Plastic ________ X X X G. Other total hardcover in zone . TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ^ ^Sira/ - B l4-07gj .^ too yROl^QSED hardcover IN ZONE A .Bouxe- ■ - -------------- 1007 , SF S.F S.F. s»S.F. aa •s;f. (<?40 e S.F. n - .<^CRE - S\(,S.F. S.F. '9;? 6 S.F. w S.F. S.F. mmm ZI0 5 P _W<»0 4t •S 26/S.F. A •14- 07^ S.F. B ■—Xi..3£-% •• • iS ... ..••S.F:- ... C H LcT\gih vvidin X X X /!€ S.F. c S.F. S.F. B. Garage* C___Driveway• <••••• • • S.F. X X 2Z3f S.F. S.F. D. ^fide^lk tooa0 fJAiU'iLK. X X lJ2£. S F ii S F rrfAS E. -Baae/Deck*^r/r/J“\ X n 773 S.F S.F F. Landscape Uederloin £^jjcl T . By Plastic ______ X X X /i S.F. /rd' S.F. S.F. G. Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPE.RTY AREA IN ZONE - B X ICO • S.F. P7P-* S.F. .7-9.2 6 r. A B •. *6 (3b) rROt l : 'lOFFIN t GPOMBEPG Fh. * TiO* • GIm* J * 2/Oct. 13 13?3 li:i3Hn FI SETBACK ZONE: CCIRCLE ONE) 0-rS' ]^Af^pCOVFiB ZONt. A. House _ 75.150*'250.50C- Lcn|th VVU.h X X X „ •mm, B. Garage ............ C. Driveway . D. Sidewallc E. Pailo/Deck F. Landscape "' UnderUin -.By Plastic•• •• C. Ocher X X X X X X X X X soo-icoo*If f SF S.F. S.F. ^sC/ A? l«?4-S.F.- $ KTHM: • ••an S.F. \^i>(s.F.-^;a4vFi S.F. S.F. -vt/dfcPC S.F. S.F. S.F. 3 ‘^S' .S.F. S.F. TOTAL Hardcover i.n zone . TOTAL PROPERTY AREA I.N ZONE ■3-»S7 - B &3iOr. pgnpnSF.n HAltDCOVER in zone A. House _____________ < - \^e •S.Fr- • S.F.-\A<tDO O, S.F. iOO gild? I S.F. A B 'Leogib \Vi4ih B. Garage' C. Driveway D. Sidewalk » • - » • E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape ..Underlain By Plastic C. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. /SFO^ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. . • • • • S.F. ■ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER I.N ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - B X IOC S F. S.F. /r.§£.__« ^3/0 A B 13 »■« RUN DATE 09/15/^9 BATCH 501 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PXA35A01 PACE A OMNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AODR PROr ABOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR Si iS-117-2S SS iiOB ••470 TONKAWA RO OAREL J LEIPOLO OAREL J LEIPOLO •70 TONKAWA RO LONG LAKE NN SS3S4 Si iS-117-2S SS •••• ••47« TONKAWA RO OEORCE L TORKELSON ETAL OEORGE L TORKELSON 470 TONKAWA RO LONG LAKE NN 55354 SS iS-iiT-as SS •01* ••••• TONKAWA RO NELINOA LEE ' NELXNDA LEE 4S« TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE NN 55354 i 3i •5-117-23 SS ••!! ••404 lOmMlh RO J SUNDET t R SUNDET JOHN S REBECCA SUNDET 4S4 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE NN 55354 Si 05-117-23 S3 0012 ••49* TONKAWA RO N S BRADLEY BON BRADLEY NICHAEL S S OLIVIA N BRADLEY 13905 IVVWOOO ST N W ANDOVER NN 55304 Si 05-117-23 SS iOlS •0492 TONKAWA RO BARBARA PUGH BARBARA PUGH 492 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE HN 55354 • •• Si 05-117-23 S3 0014 ••70i TONKAWA RD T N SPOONER i J H SPOONER TED H SPOONER 100S5 SUNAC CIR EDEN PRAIRIE NN 55347 3i 05-117-23 S3 0019 •0445 TONKAWA RO TEHPLE ISRAEL OF HINNEAPOLXS TEHPLE ISRAEL OF HINNEAPOLXS 2324 EHERSON AVE S HPLS NN 55405 TOTAL BATCH 501 OOOOi Q C 1Q Gi I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST Of I1Y KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE F. ^ Ik-: il: PERMIT RECORD Permit No.Date Type of Permit ruxB'Ur /ZiTS ilLL S/^C I - y-74 g-^g'-yy HacJe'np uXdU '~Ylu gx/‘^-w FROM : JOHN phone no. : 612 591 2654 Oct. 13 1999 05:06AM* P3 J6i5) Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sundel,Oct. II, 1999 We understand you are meeting with the Orono Planning Commission, in the near future. We have had an opportunity to review the plans you provided regarding planned improvements to the Tonkawa Road property located next door to our home at 690 Toiikawa Road. Although it is impossible for us to visualize the finished project, the plans appear to be a great improvement to the property and would seem to fit in nicely. We have no issues with your project at this time except to ask that you get as much done this year as possible so as (o complete dm woric before tlie next summer season. rROM : JOW PH[>€ ND. : 612 591 2654 Oct. 13 1999 05:06AM P2 Thomas J. DaVeau $90 Tonkawa Road Laka« MN S5356 $1^471.7959 Oclobat 1900 To: City CottAcU ol Orono Coininlwilon of Orono Wc wwn the pjoporty «l $80 Tonkawa Read/ imxawdimkdy north of the Sundet property at 664 Tonkawa Road. # VVe haw revlowcd pfopeo«d plena andhaw no iaawa nrlih thoa# plana undentatul ilieui. We tlOuk die project will lwv« a poalUva effecl on and enhance Iho ndshboihood. Sbteerely/ ^omaaj. DaVeau 680 Tccdiawa Road OrOAO If ASS'? KENT AND BARBARA MC CREIGHT 692 TONKAWA ROAD LONG LAKE. MN 55356 612 471-7656 OCTOBER 12. 1999 KATHERINE TAYLOR’S HOMES. INC. 166.*^ CO. ROAD 24 MEDINA, MN 55336 RE; REMONDELING FOR JOHN A BECKl SUNDET DEAR KATHY. THIS LETTER IS TO LET YOU KNOW WE THINK THE PROPOSED REMODELING YOU ARE GOING TO DO ON THE PROPERTY AT 684 TONKAWA RO.AD WEX ADD TO THE VALUE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WE HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE. YOUR WORKMANSHIP AND QUALITY OF WORKERS IS EXCELLENT. WE KNOW THE SUNDET’S WILL BE AS PLEASED AS WE ARE WITH THE REMODELING OF OUR HOME. THANK YOU AG.AIN FOR THE GREAT JOB. SINCERELY. 'J' BARBARA PUGH-MCCREIGHT I -“-**r**P^.A*Ai'.t '.iirwkii i ' f DU(<k) II YT^rrTY-^:l^K T. Plans & Dravrlngs a;® Property o* Kalhirint Tayior't HofiMi, Inc. Usd Pro.hibied Wittwut Consent Return AH Prints To: Ketherine Taylor (612) 475*1160 ■ ^ssimSsr^* tolMiMML ; «M'«^ ij -f^ :;:;^;illllii!li!lll!ill ::iil| M ''llmmi Flans & Drawing! are ProperT; • Kstherlnt Ttyior’t Homes, Inc*. Use Prohibited Without Consent Return Ail Prints To: Kesherine Taylor (6^2) 475-11 GO m -c 1/ J Bonestroo Rosene ■ Anderlik & ^ \ Associates Engineers & Architects January 5, 2000 Wendy Boltcnberg Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Re: Katherine Taylor Site Plan File No. 139-2539 Bonestroo. Rosene AneJerhk Associates, .rc is an Affirmative Action Equal Opportunity Employer Principals Otto G Bone'.troo. PE • Joseph C Anderlik. PE • M.uvm L Sorvolti. PE • Glenn P Cook, PE • Pobert G Srhumcht. P£ • Jerry A Bourdon. PE • Robert W Rosene. PE . Pich*ird E Turner. P£ and Susan V. Eberlin. C PA . Senior Consultants Associate Principals Howard A Sanford. PE • Keith A Gordon, PE. • Robert P Pfefferle. PE • Richard W Foster. PE • David O Loskota. P£ • Robert C Russek. Al A • Mark A. Hanson. PE • Michael T Rauimann, PE • Ted K Field. PE • Kenneth P Anderson. PE • Mark R Rolfs. PE. • Sidney P Williamson. PE . L S • Robert F Kcts“:th • Agnes M. Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE. Offices St Paul. Rochester. Willmar and St C oud. MN • Milwaukee. Wl WeOsite w .v .v bonestroo com Dear Wendy: We have reviewed the site plan (revised 12/28/99) for the proposed improvements on the Sundet property. The site is located on the east side of C.S.A.H. 135 (Tonkawa Road) in the southwest quarter of Section 5. We have the following comments in regards to engineering matters. • The proposed driveway grades have been revised to 12% with a 1.7% landing area provided along Tonkawa Road. The driveway is steeper than we recommend but is acceptable as shown. The plans should identify proposed driveway surfacing and curb and gutter. • The cross sections provided show grading within 5 feet of the property lines. The plans show that the existing retaining wall on the south side of the property may need to be replaced. It still may be necessary to acquire easements from the neighbors to allow for .laining wall replacement or storage of excavated materials. • The proposed storm sewer design rai.ses the following questions that need to be answered: 1. How will silt be kept out of the drainfield? 2. What soil identification or percolation tests have been performed in the proposed drainfield area? This information should be submitted for review with the final storm system design. 3. How will the system work in the winter? What provisions have been made to accommodate flows if the system plugs up? 4. What storm event is the drainfield designed for? We recommend that the minimum drainfield storage capacity be for a one year storm event. What is the top elevation of the rock bed? H.XS the existing sanitary sewer, located approximcitely where the proposed drainfield is shown, been accounted for? The location and elevation of the existing sewer should be venfied and shown in both plan and profile views. 7. What is the maintenance plan or schedule for the storm system? It is critical that a maintenance plan be developed and followed so that the system continues to function as designed. 8. The property owner should be aware that erosion problems are likely and will need to be repaired as they occur. Details should be provided for the proposed retaining wall. The plans should provide additional erosion conuol measures in disturbed areas due to the steep slopes on the site. At a minimum, disturbed areas should be restored immediately with staked sod or seed and fiber blanket. 5. 6. Plca.se contact me at (651) 604-4863 if you have an> questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly. BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK A AS.SOCIAFES. INC. f/ Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Gappa. City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 > St. Paul, MN 55113 > 651*636*4600 • Fax: 651*636*1311 COUMCIL MEETING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ^ ^ 2000 __CITY Ol* CHU ivo DATE: January 10, 2000 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Request to Purchase WaterTesting Laboratory for Navarre Plant We are requesting approval to purchase a Basic Water Quality Laboratory for the Navarre Water Plant. This equipment is used for routine water testing. The testing equipment currently being used is 20 years old and needs to be replaced and upgraded. Upgrading this testing equipment was planned as part of the treatment plant rehabilitation project, but was not specifically approved in the project budget so we are requesting Council approval at this time. This is the same laboratory equipment currently in use at the Highway 12 Water Plant, and would standardize the equipment for both plants. This makes it easier for ordering replacement chemicals that are used with this laboratory. This equipment is the industry standard that is used in most water plants. The cost for purchase of this equipment from Hach Chemical Company is $3,444.30. Purchase of this equipment will also require a budget adjustment for the 2000 Water Fund Capital Outlay Budget. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve purchase of a DREL/2010 Basic Water Quality Laboratory from Hach Chemical Co. for $3,444.30 Motion to approve a budget adjustment for the 2000 Water Fund Capital Outlay Budget to fund the purchase of a DREL/2010 Basic Water Quality Laboratory for $3,444.30 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL MeeT^^<ri JAN 0 1 2000 CITY Of Onui^v^ DATE: January 10, 2000 ITEM NO.; Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Request for Sanitary Sewer 809 North Brown Road Introduction We have received a request from the property owner at 809 North Brown Road for connection to sanitary sewer. This property is located on the west side of North Brown Road and adjacent to Dickey Lake. There is an existing pressure sewer line in North Brown Road installed in 1997 for the North Long Lake sewer project. Several properties to the north were sewered as part of the North Long Lake sewer project using the additional sewer units from the 1996 MUSA expansions Comprehensive Plan amendment. This property was existing developed lot with an older house that was demolished in 1996. In 1997 preliminary plat approval was granted for a two-lot subdivision. After preliminary plat approval, the lot was sold and the new owner withdrew the subdivision application. The property owner is planning on building a new house on the lot and has requested approval for connection to sanitary sewer. The new Comprehensive Plan proposes a MUSA expansion for this area. With the proposed future MUSA expansion, this property will be eligible for sewer in several years. Investment in a new mound system now is not a logical idea. The City has fifty additional sewer units available that were provided by the Metropolitan Council when the recent MUSA expansions were obtained. These units are for providing sewer service to existing developed properties located adjacent to sewer. The City required that these properties have nonconforming septic systems and not have adequate replacement septic sites. These requirements were used to limit the number of units used and not waste units on properties that could utilize septic systems. The number of units available does not appear to a problem. We have only used approximately ten units in the last several years. With the proposed Comprehensive Plan MUSA expansions, there will be very few properties adjacent to existing sewer lines that are not in the MUSA. This property does not currently have an existing house on it. There was a pre 1966 house on the property that was demolished in 1996, so the lot can be considered previously developed. The septic system for the old house was nonconforming. However, there are four suitable septic sites available on the property that were located for the previously proposed subdivision of this property. Therefore, this property technically does have adequate septic sites available. Recommendations We are recommending sewering this property using one of the fifty sewer units available from the 1996 MUSA expansions Comprehensive Plan amendment. This is based on the fact that the property is a previously developed lot that used to have a nonconforming septic system for the existing house, which was demolished in 1996. The property is located directly adjacent to Dickey Lake, and sewering of the property will provide a higher level of protection for Dickey Lake than using a septic system. This property is also located in the new Comprehensive Plan MUSA expansion area. The 2000 connection charge for hookup to the North Long Lake sewer project is $19,380. Connection of this property will be into a force main sewer line, so a grinder pump will be required. The property owner will be responsible for the installation and maintenance of the grinder pump. Connection of this property will require tapping of the force main in North Brown Road. We are recommending that City Engineer approval be required for the sewer connection plans and that construction inspection be required for any work in the public right of way. The property owner will be responsible for all costs associated with the sewer connection. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve use of one sewer unit for connection of 809 North Brown Road to sanitary sewer with the property owner responsible for all costs associated with the hookup, including the connection fee for the North Long Lake sewer project, and City Engineer plan approval required. fjrrPartWTt Part XXX 1CCUV Long Into Part' rrr Part XXIV, i-«------lI Part XXVn/ Nonage LakeM Part VII <r liLlMl/\IAK-V PL/s\ APpli^/i/fb Loi U//QC /5S out LoT p/»1 S■6l^l?ll/iS■|<^^^i 1 IKlt'Li/ au^killfl IL^QUlSl^^ 3f CaHSM\^ucltlO. rfv4K,-|\ N 66*49* 19” W y 666.74 rn 00 m•o 4^ <1 ^ d / ^ x:t:o 2 A' / y// _ ^ yy y yjy '' ' i ^ j \ 323.4- H t:o 2T yfpR • *v •IV»• ••••••• ■■/T°'i°i'*^//^?ir/^"41^ / / //Zv^W ! \t.0*9e^ 990.21 X 2 /^c(i2 tLuri.bi ^t^iiot/vuiiiiL ■ stnu s\iv'i AiypuiiiLE f^)n iwo u)ts REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION coi meeting JAN 0 1 2000 CITY u»- unuivu DATE: Jan'jary 10, 2000 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Engineer's Report Item Description: Request for Sanitary Sewer 680 South Brown Road Introduction We have received a request from the property owner at 680 South Brown Road for connection to sanitary sewer. This property is located on the east side of South Brown Road, 300 ’ north of the South Brown RoadAVeber Hills Road intersection and is adjacent to the Weber Hills Sewer Project. As part of the Weber Hills sewer project, a pressure sewer line will be installed in Weber Hills Road ending ISO' west of South Brown Road. Connection of 6o'^ South Brown Road to sewer will require extension of the Weber Hills sewer line east along Weber Hills Road and north along South Brown Road to reach this property. This property is an existing developed lot with a noncompliant septic system. The system needs to be replaced by December 31, 2002. The possibilities for septic sites are extremely limited on this property. Most of the property is wetland. There is only a small area of the property that is outside the 75' wetland setback for septic systems and this area is on a steep slope. Recommendations We are recommending sewering this property using one of the 50 sewer units available from the 1996 MUSA expansions comprehensive plan amendment. This property qualifies for sewer because it is an existing residential developed lot adjacent to a sewer project, has an existing nonconforming septic system, and no suitable areas are available for a replacement septic system. Connection of this property will require the extension of approximately 460 ’ of 2" force main from the end of the Weber Hills project. A residential grinder pump station will also be required. The estimated costs for the sewer extension, to the property line, are $21,460. On past projects a $5,000 credit for the purchase of a residential grinder station was added to the assessment if the property owners wanted to be assessed for the grinder station costs. The property owners would then be provided with a check for $5,000 for the purchase and installation of their own grinder pump. The total estimated assessment including the grinder pump allowance would be $26,460. This could be assessed over a 15-year period at an estimated interest rate of 6.5%. The annual special assessment costs included in the property taxes would be approximately $2,800. This property was not included in the original Weber Hills project, and adding this property to the project would increase the costs to Weber Hills residents. On other projects when additional properties were connected to the sewer project, a connection fee equal to the project assessment was charged. However, for these properties the sewer line »vus located in front of the house and the construction costs for the actual hookups were con>«deiably less than the costs for this property. If an estimated $11,500 connection fee was charged, in addition to the sewer extension costs of $26,640, the total cost for sewer would be about $38,000. This does not appear to be a feasible or reasonable cost. Council approval was recently granted for the sewering of 800 South Brown Road with the property owner being assessed only for the costs to extend sewer from the end of the Weber Hills project. This property is the same situation as 800 South Brown Road which is located 400 ‘ south of the Weber Hills/South Brown Road intersection. The estimated sewer cost for 800 South Brown Road is $28,300. Our recommendation is that a comiection fee to the Weber Hills Sewer project not be charged and the property owner be assessed for the costs for the extension of sewer from the end of the Weber Hills sewer project to the property line. The most cost-effective method would be for the completion of this work with the Weber Hills sewer project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve use of one sewer unit for connection of 800 South Brown Road to sanitary sewer with the property owner assessed for the costs of the sewer extension from the end of the Weber Hills Sewer project. a 4 Part YH ^artXVn . "4 Part VI Part XX;Tanagt Lake yi7l*S Sqy wm 7/1 ill <PartVm 200 soon 81UNVM R Part XXVI %• • • •PartXVm 4. • ^PartXXVin ?s: ?? I I I I V ^OUNnn mh^tinQ 0 I 2000 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY Of- Omvj/^q DATE: Januar>' 5,2000 ITEM NO: ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title Cit>' Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Cit>' Administrator's Report Item Description: Sewer Assessment/Cost Allocation Policy Prior to the Stubbs Bay sewer project constructed in 1992, the City’s policy was to assess properties for 100% of the costs of sewer projects. However, this policy was often in conflict with court decisions that restricted the amount of the assessment to the benefit received by the property as measured by the increase in the value of the property resulting from the public improvement. The City was unsuccessful in defending the 100% assessment in several sewer projects. This resulted in the City paying a significant percentage of the cost of these projects. For the Stubbs Bay project, the City determined that the assessment amounts would be set based on the benefit of the sewer project to the properties. This resulted in the City paying a portion of the project cost. It also avoided the legal costs of defending the assessment against appeals. \Mien the City was successful in amending the MUSA line to reflect the extension of sewer to the ten “hot spots”, the policy guiding the project assessments was that the City would continue to set the assessment level based on the benefit to the affected properties. The basis of this policy was that there were some “hot spot” neighborhoods with a large number of small homes on small lots whose value would not increase by the per unit cost of the sewer project. These neighborhoods were the ones with the greatest existing and potential septic problems whose only solution was the extension of sewer to the neighborhood. For neighborhoods where the extension of sewer was the only solution for existing and potential septic problems, the City set the assessment amount based on the amount of benefit to the property that could be defended against appeal. In neighborhoods where the vast majority of properties could solve current and future septic problems without sewer, the City detemiined a sewer project would not be constructed unless the properly owners determined that the benefit of the project w as equal to or greater than the amount of the assessments, and agreed to pay 100% of the costs through assessments. In this way, the only projects that woulu not be 100% as.sessed would be the ones with the greatest potential for public health problems related to septic systems in the absence of sewer. The City’s assessment policy has been tweaked in recent years to enable properties with fully conforming septic systems to opt out of a project and the project assessments. However, these properties will be required to pay the full per unit cost of the sewer project at such time as they connect to the sewer system in the future. Request for Council Action continued Page 2 Januar> 5. 2000 Sewer Assessment/Cost Allocation Policv Most recently, the Fox Ridge neighborhood has asked whether the City would finance a portion of the costs of the *‘trunk” portion of the sewer project, since the trunk line may serve additional properties in the future, which could then pay a trunk fee as reimbursement of the City ’s up-front costs. The issue of funding the "trunk” portion of a sewer project differently or separately from the remainder of a project is related to, but separate from, the assessment policy issue. The trunk fundin'! issue w ill be addressed later in this memo. Staff Recommendation Regarding the Cit> *s Sewer Assessment Policy It is statT s recommendation that the City ’s assessment policy should continue to be that assessments are based on the benefit to the property. Also, where there is not a significant threat to public health, a sewer project should only be built if the property owners believe the full per unit cost of the project is equal to the per unit benefit of the project. With the completion of the Webber Hills project (planned for 2000). the City will have sewered all neighborhoods with density greater than two acres, and most neighborhoods relatively close to an existing sewer line. If the City continues to extend sewer to developed neighborhoods, the cost of the projects will increase substantially. This is due to the need to build more sewer line to connect a neighborhood to an existing sewer line, and due to the need to build more sewer line per property to ser\ e neighborhoods developed at two acre density. With these higher costs and the availability of alternate septic sites on existing tw o acre development, it becomes e\ en more important that a sewer project not move ahead unless the property owners believe the full per unit cost of the project is equal to the per unit benefit of the project, and are willing to pay that full cost. Sewer Trunk Options As the City continues to extend sewer, it is moving from neighborhoods that are adjacent to an existing sewer line to neighborhoods that are farther and farther from an existing sewer line. This causes the cost of a sewer project to increase significantly if the neighborhood to be served pays the full cost of the trunk line. A sewer trunk line by definition is a line that has the ability to serve other properties or neighborhoods it passes in addition to the speeific neighborhood that initiates the sewer project. The problem is that the other properties and neighborhoods passed by the trunk line may or may not need or want sewer at the time the trunk line is installed. There are three options for funding a trunk sewer line. A.The specific neighborhood that initiates the project pays the full cost as part of the project assessments. 1 ( ■; I • • • • Request for Council Action continued Page 3 January 5,2000 Sewer Assessment/Cost Allocation Policy B.The City determines the number of units that will use the trunk line, including those in the initiating neighborhood, and divides the cost of the trunk line by the number of units to generate a per unit trunk cost. This trunk cost can then be funded in two wavs: 1) Properties along the trunk line are assessed for the trunk costs. 2) The City funds the trunk line costs, and all properties pay the trunk costs as a connection charge when they connect to the trunk line. Analysis of Trunk Line Funding Option.s A. The initiating neighborhood pays full costs. This has been the City’s practice. It is based on the determination that a neighborhood should pay all of the costs related to bringing sewer to the neighborhood. Advantages • The City is certain of full payment for the trunk line through assessments. • Very simple. No need to try to calculate the number of units that may make use of the trunk line in the future. • No uncertainty about the City recouping its costs. Disadvantages Less incentive to ensure the line is sized to meet potential future needs. The initiating neighborhood pays the full cost of a trunk line that may be used by other properties in the future. The initiating neighborhood cost is higher than with the other alternatives. The initiating neighborhood sees the City receiving a windfall in the future when the other properties along the trunk line pay connection charges. B-1. Properi, ^s along the trunk line are assessed for the trunk costs. Advantages The initiating neighborhood costs arc lower. If there are no appeals, the City is assured repayment through assessments. Request for Council Action continued Page 4 January 5, 2000 Sewer Asscssment/Cost Allocation Policy Disadvantages The Ciiy will be assessing properties for a trunk line they may not think is a benefit, if there are assessment appeals, it may be difficult to show a benefit when the properties have an alternate septic s'’e. The assessments may cause pressure to increase density. The Metropolitan Council is concerned about assessing undeveloped properties for sewer without increasing density according to a staged development plan. B-2. Trunk line connection charges. Advantages • No assessment appeals. • The initiating neighborhood has lower costs. Disadvantages • The City may never recoup its costs through connection charges. Staff Recommendation Regarding Trunk Sewer Lines Staff recommends that in the absence of a very detailed long-term sewer plan, only those properties who will immediately use the trunk line should pay the costs of the trunk line. Staff would recommend the funding options B-1 or B-2 only under the following conditions: 1. A majority of the properties along the trunk line agree to the proposed assessment. 2. The City has strong assurance that the vast majority of pruperties identified as potential users of the trunk line will connect within a reasonable period (5-15 years). 3. The City is able to finance the trunk costs for the necessary period. Sewer Assessment/Cost Allocation Policy Applied to the Fox Ridge Sewer Project At the public hearing held for the Fo,\ Ridge sewer project, the residents questioned the cost allocation for the force main along South Brown Road. The plan presented to the neighborhood was to assess the costs of the entire project, including the South Brown Road force main, to the Fox Ridge residents. They were concerned about paying for the Brown Road force main that may provide sewer serv ice to additional properties. Their opinion was that the force main costs should be allocated to all property owners who will use it. .4 . . Request for Council Action continmd Page 5 January 5,2000 Sewer Assessment/Cost Allocation Policy Applying the City’s sewer assessment policy to the Fox Ridge project provides three assessment options: Option 1: Fox Ridge MUSA Expansion Area Assessed for All Project Costs This option is brsed on the premise that all of the sewer lines are necessary to sewer this neighborhood. This is basically the historical city policy, that residents pay for the full cost of sewer to serve their neighborhoods. In the future, if additional properties connect to this sewer they would pay a connection fee to the City based on the project assessments adjusted for inflation. The advantage of this option is that the entire cost could be assessed now and the City would not have any debt service costs. There are nine units in the Fox Ridge MUSA expansion area and the estimated assessment is $23,600 for a pressure sewer system. The Fox Ridge neighborhood residents have expressed concerns about the fairness of this option because the City will collect connection fees above and beyond the actual cost to construct the project if future properties are connected to the sewer. Potion 2 :Fox Ridue MUSA Expansion Area Plus Eligible Property Owners Along South Brown Requesting Sewer at This Time be Assessed an Equal Amount This option would be to contact the five property owners, with nonconforming septic systems, along South Brown Road to find out if they are interested in obtaining sewer at this time. The total project costs could then be evenly split among all participating properly owners which seems to be a fair and equitable cost allocation method Any additional properties, with nonconforming septic systems, that decide to request sewer in the future would then pay a project connection fee based on the project assessments adjusted for inflation. The project assessments will var>’, from $23,600 to $ 17,400 per unit depending on the number of participating properties. The City would not incur any debt service costs for this option. The Fox Ridge neighborhood residents may still have concerns about the City collecting connection fees above and beyond the actual cost to construct the project. Another disadvantage of this option is the project assessments are unknown when we contact the residents along South Brown Road, with nonconforming septic systems, regarding sewer connection. Option 3: Fox Ridge MUSA Expansion Area Plus All Five Filigible Property Owners Along South Brown Road With Units for Pronertics That Decide Not to Request Sewer Now Banked bv CiW For this option the City would contact the five properly owners, with nonconforming septic systems, along South Brown Road to find out if they are interested in obtaining sewer at this time. The properly owners that want sewer now would be included in the project assessment. Units would be banked for the remaining properties with nonconforming septic systems. These property owners would then pay a connection charge when they connect to sewer. With this option the City would have to finance the debt service costs for the banked sewer units. The project costs for this option would be evenly split among the fourteen properties, that could benefit from sewer, which seems to .. I. Request for Council Action continued Page 6 January 5,2000 Sewer Assessment/Cost Allocation Policy be a fair and equitable cost allocation method. The estimated project assessment is $ 17,400, and the estimated annual debt service costs for this assessment will be $1,850 per banked unit. Staff Recommendation Because of the uncertainty regarding the potential and timing of properties connecting to sewer at some time in the future, staff recommends that only those properties with an imminent need to connect to sewer be added to a sewer project. Staffs recommendation is that the current policy, which requires the properties in the sewer project area to pay the full cost of the sewer, remain in place; with the addition of an option to add properties to an initial project area if they have an imminent need to connect lo sewer. Staff also recommends that in any situation where the City is providing up-front financing for a portion of a sewer project that will be repaid through connection charges, the City’s portion of the financing should be from the sewer fund, and the connection charges should be used to reimburse the sewer fund. In this way, there is no lax levy required to fund the City’s portion of the projects. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to clarify the sewer assessment/cost allocation policy, particularly in relation to the Fox Ridge sewer project. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COUMr.ll. meeting JAN 0 1 2000 Cn V or omongl Date: November 29,1999 JiA/jwAAy 5^ ZociC* Item No.: j Q Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron Title: Senior Planning Coorolnator Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: Declaration of Local Jurisdiction re: ISTS - Resolution List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - County Ordinance No. 19 orit>g^c. Hennepin County has adopted an Ordinance for the Regulation of Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). The County Board requires that each municipality that will retain its own jurisdiction over ISTS must submit a formal statement to that effect prior to 1-1-2000. It is clearly the City’s intent to continue local jurisdiction over ISTS. A number of facets of the County ordinance are worthy of note: Individuals may construct their own ISTS serving their own dwelling, but it must have been designed by a State-licensed ISTS professional Existing systems with at least 2 feet of separation between the distribution medium and the seasonally saturated zone will not be required to upgrade if: - the system is not an Imminent Public Health Threat; - the system is not in Shoreland; - the system is not in a wellhead protection area; and - the system does not serve a food/beverage/lodging facility (Note: the above matches the new State regulations, with the exception that the State requires existing systems built after April 1,1996 to have 3’ of separation) Failing systems shall be upgraded within 3 years, and County may grant a 2-year extension. Systems that are considered as posing an imminent threat to public health or safety must be upgraded in 10 months. Separation distance to a Type 3,4, 5 or 6 wetland is 50 ’ (our standard is 75 ’) Alternative and experimental systems are only allowed where a standard system cannot be used Warrantied systems are prohibited On-Site Jurisdiction November 29,1999 Page 2 Performance systems are not allowed, as the County Ordinance does not specifically adopt section 7080.0179 On Site Systems Manager Chris Pence is currently drafting proposed City code revisions which will be submitted to the Council for review and adoption this winter, in order that our ordinances address all the recent changes in State regulations. It is staffs current understanding that the City codes must be no less restrictive than State and Countv regulations. One potential impact is that Orono may have to require nonconforming system replacement on a 3-year timeframe rather than the current 7- 10 year timeframe. Staff is investigating the options on this. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt the attached resolution indicating to Henncp'r. County that Orono will retain local jurisdiction over ISTS. r A RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT THE CITY OF ORONO WILL RETAIN JURISDICTION OVER INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM (ISTS) REGULATION WHEREAS, the City of Orono has adopted regulations for the design, location, construction, use and maintenance of Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS); and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has an established permitting and inspection program for ISTS management; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono has adopted certain sections of MPC A Rules Chapter 7080 and is in the process of updating City codes to address recent Rule changes within Chapter 7080;and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has adopted ordinances regulating ISTS in those areas of the County where local municipal jurisdiction of ISTS is lacking; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has requested formal indication from the City that Orono intends to retain jurisdiction over ISTS within the corporate boundaries of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, that the City of Orono will retain responsibility for and jurisdiction over ISTS within the corporate boundaries of the City, and will not abandon such jurisdiction unless at least one year notice is given to the County. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10 ”' day of January, 2000. Attest: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County An Equal Opportunity Employer November 19, 1999 9 ^ ^oqq City of Orono Linda Vee, City Clerk PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Ci iCi'iO Dear Ms. Vee: Thank you for your response to the previous survey indicating that your city will be retaining responsibility for Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS) regulation, it was very helpful for planning purposes. The Hennepin County Board has adopted Ordinance Number 19 regulating ISTS. Enclosed please find a copy of the Ordinance, which will be effective on January 1, 2000. At this point we need a statement of official action from your city council or authorized official indicating that your will be responsible for ISTS regulation. We encourage you to review the Hennepin County Ordinance Number 19, Individual Sewage Treatment System Standards and submit your updated ordinance to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Should you change your disposition of ISTS regulation in the future, please refer to subdivision 4 of the ordinance. Sincerely, Susan Palchick, Ph.D., MPH Super\isor Enclosures Cc: Ronald Moorse, Administrator Community Health Department Epidemiolog>’ and Environmental Health 1011 South First Street, Suite 215 Hopkitu, MN 5 5343-9413 Epidemiology (612) 930-2729 Environmental Health (612) 930-2770 FAX:(612) 930-2782 Rtcyeltd i • I V. *A •'h " •*?* ‘3 •*. './ '• :•! ^S^‘; ^ •■/'' '.-.'I- ■•'■ 'r --V: 'a. ■ ■•=■ ;""v; " * ' >-^: • • .. 4; •: • • . V* 4.# . -• . . • ' • • • .* 'V.' ^.•• •=; * ’. .*• •? *: ■J •« *r -j .w • V I' *• .% 'V- • ••* .'f» . •?>••** . ‘ •• ■ .V. 'r.'i >■ ♦ •. . W* r 't. -A •-T.'J-V^.7^•V ' • V/Pii •V '■^i. ?», ;.',V .».• •..• Tabic of Contents SUBDIVISION I: General Provisions.....................I SUBDIVISION 2: Definitions................................3 SUBDIVISION 3: Standards Adopted by k^c l^crenoe ■•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ^1 SUBDIVISION 4: Jurisdiction...............................4 SUBDIVISION 5: Administrative by the Health Authority ......................5 SUBDIVISON 6: Pcmiifling................................7 SUBDIVISON 7: Construction Inspections ........10 SUBDIVISION 8: Existing Systems.....................14 SUBDIVISION 9: Violations ...............................18 SUBDIVISION 10: Additional Standards for Health and Environmental Protection ..............................19 SUBDIVISION II: Enforcement............................21 SUBDIVISION!-: Fees.......................................21 SUBDIVISION 13: Severability............................22 •« ORDINANCE No. 19 INDIVIDUAL SEWAOE TREATMFNT SYSTEMS STANDAIinS The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners docs hereby adopt this Ordinance establishing county-wide stanclards for the regulation of Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS) pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 115.55 and Minn. Rules Chapter 7080. SUBDIVISION 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1.1 Purpose. This ordinance is enacted to provide minimum standards for the regulation of individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS) including: their proper location, design and construction; their necessary modification and reconstruction; their operation, maintenance and repair for the purpose of protecting surface water and groundwater from contamination by human sewage and waterborne household and commercial wastes; the protection of the public’s health and safety; and the elimination and prevention of the development of public nuisances, pursuant to the authority granted under Minn. Stat. Chapters 115 and 145A and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 and as amended that may pertain to sewage and wastewater treatment. 1.2 Objectives. The principal objectives of this Ordinance are as follows: 1.21 1.22 1.23 The protection of Hennepin County ’s lakes, rivers and streams, wetlands, and groundwater essential to the promotion of public health, safety, welfare, socioeconomic growth and development of the County in perpetuity. The regulation of proper ISTS construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance to prevent the entry and migration of contaminants, thereby ensuring the non-degradation of surface water and groundwater. f The establishment of minimum standards for ISTS placement, design, construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance to prevent contamination and, if contamination is discovered, the identification and control of its conseouences and the \ 1 abatement of its source and migration. 1.24 The appropriate utilization of privy vaults and other non-water carried ISTS. 1.25 The prevention and control of water borne disease, lake degradation, • groundwater related hazards, and public nuisance conditions through technical assistance and education, plan reviews, inspections, ISTS surveys and complaint investigation. SUBDIVISION 2: DEFINITIONS. 2.1 Health Authority. The Hennepin County Community Health Department and its designated agent who shall be a qualified employee or licensee. 2.2 Owner. The fee owner(s) and, if applicable, the contract-for-deed purchaser. Ownership interests shall be determined by reference to the records of Hennepin County. The owner of each lot upon served by an ISTS is responsible for the lawful operation and maintenance of each ISTS. SUBDIVISION 3: STANDARDS ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. 3.1 This Ordinance hereby adopts by reference Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080, sections 7080.0020, 7080.0060, 7080.0065, 7080.0110, 7080.0120, 7080.0125, 7080.0130, 7080.0150, 7080.0160, 7080.0170, 7080.0175, 7080.0176, and 7080.0190 being the sections containing the technical standards and criteria contained in the “Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Program”. SUBDIVISION 4: JURISDICTION. 4.1 Municipalities. Municipalities in Hennepin County that elect to regulate Individual Sewage Treatment Systems pursuant to Minn. Rules Chapter 7080.0300 - 0305 shall: A. Provide verification to the Health I Authority of its intention to assume or retain jurisdiction of Individual Sewage Treatment Systems by submitting a resolution of the City Council or authorized governmental official to that effect prior to January 1, 1999 or witliin 90 days of County adoption, whichever comes later. 4 B. Provide timely notification to the Health Authority of its intent to assume or abandon its jurisdiction but in no case provide less than one years’ notice of such action or at a time mutually acceptable to both parties. C. In the event of abandonment of jurisdiction, agree to cooperate with the Health Authority in the transfer of responsibility including timely transfer of all records maintained by the municipality. SUBDIVISION 5: ADMINISTRATION BY THE HEALTH AUTHORITY. 5.1 The Health Authority shall have the following duties and responsibilities: A. B. C. D. E. To review all applications for ISTS. To issue all required permits. To conduct construction inspections and to perform all necessary tests to determine its conformance with this Ordinance. To investigate complaints regarding ISTS. To perform compliance inspections and to issue Certificates of 5.2 F. G. H. I. Compliance or Notices of Noncompliance where appropriate. To issue Stop Work Orders and Notices of Violation pursuant to this Ordinance. To take complaints to the Municipal or County Attorney for violations of this Ordinance. To maintain proper records for ISTS including site evaluation records, design records including calculations and summaries for all system component sizings and as-builts, complaints on noncompliance, compliance inspections, site evaluations, applications and exhibits, variance requests, issued permits. Certificates of Compliance, and enforcement proceedings. To submit annual reports to the MPCA to demonstrate enforcement of this Ordinance per Chapter 7080.0310. Neither the issuance of permits. Certificates of Compliance nor Notices of Noncompliance as requested or issued shall be construed to represent a guarantee or warranty of the system’s operation or effectiveness. Such certificates signify that the system in questioii is or has been designed and installed in compliance or non-compliance with the provision of these standards and regulations. SUBDIVISION 6: PERMITTING. 6.1 Required Permits. A permit from the Health Authority is required before any ISTS in Hennepin County’s jurisdiction is installed, replaced, altered, repaired or extended. Installation, replacement, alteration, repair, or extension of an ISTS shall not begin prior to the receipt of a permit from the Health Authority for each specific installation, replacement, alteration, repair or extension pursuant to this Ordinance. Such permits arc not transferable as to person or place. Such permits shall expire 12 months after date of issuance. Upon request of an inspector, permits shall be provided by the pcrmitcc at the time of inspection. 6.2 Permits Not Required. Permits shall not be required for the following activities: A, Repair or replacement of pumps, floats or other electrical devices of the pump. B. C. D. Repair or replacement of baffles in the septic tank. Installation or repair of inspection pipes and manhole covers. Repair or replacement of the line from the building to the septic tank. 6.4 Permit Application. All applications for an ISTS permit shall include the following information: A. B. C. D. E. . F. G. II. Name and address of property owner. Property identification number. Legal description of the property. ISTS Designer Name, address, phone number and State ISTS License number; (or Health Authority qualified employee name and number). ISTS Installer name, address, phone number and ISTS License Number. Site evaluation report on forms approved by the Health Authority. System design with full information including applicable construction information on forms approved by the Health Authority. The location of at least one designated additional soil treatment area that can support a standard soil I. J. treatment system on lots created after January 23, 1996. Any other information requested pertinent to the process. A certified statement from the person who conducted the work. 6.5 Individual^ Constructing Tlicir Own ISTS. A license is not required for an • individual who is constructing a system on land that is owned or leased by the individual and functions solely as a dwelling or seasonal dwelling for that individual. The ISTS shall be designed by a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency licensed Designer I or II. 6.6 Application Review and Determination. If after consideration of the application for a permit, the Health Authority determines that the work proposed conforms to and complies with provision of this Ordinance, the Health Authority shall issue a written permit granting preliminaiy approval authorizing initiation of the work as proposed. If the Health Authority determines that the work proposed will not conform to or comply with the provisions of this Ordinance, the Health Authority shall deny the permit application. The permit application may be revised or corrected and resubmitted to the Health Authority for reconsideration. 6.7 Variances. Variances to decrease the three feet of vertical separation required beneath the distribution medium and the saturated soil or bedrock must be approved by the MPCA as per the procedures contained in Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.0305 Subp. 3. Variances to wells and water supply lines require approval from the Minnesota Department of Health. Any othe.* requests for a variance from this ordinance shall be requested in writing to the Health Authority on forms approved by the Health Authority. SUBDIVISION 7: CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS. 7.1 Requirements. Compliance inspections shall be conducted by the Health Authority anytime an ISTS is installed, replaced, altered, repaired or extended. The installation and construction of the ISTS shall be in accordance with the permit requirements and application design. If any ISTS component is covered before being inspected by the Health Authority, it shall be uncovered if so ordered by the Health i 7.2 7.3 7.4 Authority. Proposals to alter the permitted construction shall be reviewed and the proposed change accepted by the Health Authority prior to construction. Inspections shall be conducted at least once during the construction of the ISTS to assure that the system has been constnicted per the submitted and approved design. Inspector. Compliance inspections for construction, replacement, alteration or repair work on ISTS shall be conducted by the Health Authority. Request for Inspection. It shall be the duty of the permitee to notify the Health Authority of the date and time the inspection is requested at least 24 hours (excluding weekend days and holidays) preceding the requested inspection. If the permitee provides proper notice as described above and the Health Authority does not appear for an inspection within two hours after the time scheduled, the permitee may complete the installation and submit an As-built for the system. Access to Premises and Records. Upon the request of the Health Authority, the applicant, owner, permitee or any other 7.5 person shall allow access at any reasonable time to the affected premises as well as any related records, for the purposes of regulating and enforcing this Ordinance. If entry is refused, the Health Authority shall have the recourse to the remedies provided by law to secure entry. No person shall hinder or otherwise interfere with the Health Authority in the performance of their duties and responsibilities pursuant to the enforcement of this Ordinance. Refusal to allow reasonable access to the Health Authority shall be deemed a separate and distinct offense, whether or not any other specific violations are cited. Stop Work Orders. Whenever any ISTS work is being done contrary to the provisions of this Ordinance, the Health Authority may order the work stopped by verbal or written notice personally served upon the installer or the owner of the land. All installation and construction shall cease and desist until subsequent authorization to proceed is received from the Health Authority. 7.6 As-biiilts. As-builts shall be submitted to the Health Authority within five (5) working days of completion of the work on 7.7 the ISTS on forms provided or approved by the Health Authority. The As-built shall include photographs of the system prior to covering and a certified statement that the work was installed in accordance with submitted design and permit conditions and that it was free from defects. If an As-built is not submitted, the Health Authority may require the uncovering of the system for inspection. Inspection Reports. A Certificate of Compliance or Notice of Noncompliance shall be prepared by the Health Authority following an inspection or review of As- builts submitted in accordance with Section 7.6. A Certificate of Compliance or Notice of Noncompliance shall include a signed statement by the inspector identifying the type of ISTS inspected and whether the system is in compliance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.0060. A copy of the Certifieate of Compliance or Notice of Noncompliance shall be provided to the property owner within 30 days of the compliance inspection and a copy kept on file with the Health Authority. 7.71 Certificates of Compliance issued by the Heallh Authority for new construction and replacement shall be valid for five (5) years from the date of the compliance inspection or As- built certification unless the Health Authority or licensed inspector identifies the system as an Imminent Public Health Threat. 7.72 Notices of Violation may be issued with Notices of Noncompliance when the Health Authority determines that new construction, replacement or repairs are not in compliance with this Ordinance. SUBDIVISION 8: EXISTING SYSTEMS. 8.1 Requirements. The Health Authority shall require a compliance inspection of an existing system whenever: A. B. In designated Shoreland Management Areas, an application for any type of building or land use permits is made. If the Health Authority deems a compliance inspection may be necessary, including, but not limited to, the receipt of information of a potential ISTS failure. 14 C. An additional bedroom on the property is requested. If a request for an additional bedroom is received between November 1 and April 30, the governing municipality may issue a building permit immediately with the contingent requirement that a compliance inspection of the existing ISTS shall be completed by the following June 1. 8.2 Inspector. Only the Health Authority or licensed Designer I or Inspector, shall conduct an inspection when a compliance inspection is required for an existing ISTS. 8.3 Existing Systems in Compliance with the Two-foot Rule. An existing system shall be considered in compliance with the technical standards of MN Rules 7080 and need not be upgraded if the following conditions exist: A. B. The system is not an Imminent Public Health Threat. The system has at least two feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the distribution medium and seasonally saturated soil as indicated by mottling or other indicators. 15 C. The system is not in a Shoreland Designated Area. D. The system is not in a wellhead protection area. E. The system is not serving a food/ beverage/lodging facility. 8.4 Inspection Reports. A copy of the Certificate of Compliance or Notice of Noncompliance resulting from a compliance inspection shall be provided to the property owner and the Health Authority within 30 days of inspection. 8.41 Certificates of Compliance issued by a licensed ISTS Inspector for an existing system shall be valid for three (3) years from the date of the compliance inspection unless the Health Authority or licensed inspector identifies the system as an Imminent Public Health Threat. 8.42 A Notice of Noncompliance shall be issued in the following circumstances and the conditions noted in violation of this Ordinance shall be remedied as follows: A. An ISTS determined to be failing shall be upgraded, replaced, or repaired in accord with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.0060, within three (3) years, or its use is discontinued. The Health Authority, at its discretion, may grant an extension of an additional two (2) years. B. An ISTS posing an imminent threat to public health or safety shall be up;;raded, replaced or repaired within 10. months. The Health Authority will give consideration to weather conditions in determining compliance dates. If an ISTS is determined to be a public health nuisance by the Health Authority, the Health Authority may order the owner of the ISTS to cease use immediately and not allow use of the ISTS until it is corrected in accordance with the recommendations of the Health Authority. SUBDIVISION 9: VIOLATIONS. Noncompliance with this Ordinance by an applicant, permitee, installer or other person, as determined by the Health Authority, shall constitute a violation. 9.2 Serving a Notice of Violation. The Health Authority shall serve in person or by mail a Notice of Violation upon any person determined to be not in compliance with this Ordinance. 9.3 Contents of a Notice of Violation. A Notice of Violation shall contain the following: A. B. C. D. A statement documenting the findings of fact determined through inspections, reinspection or investigation. A list of specific violation or violations of this Ordinance. The specific requirements for correction or removal of the specified violation(s). A mandatory time schedule for correction, removal and compliance with this Ordinance. 9.4 Notification of MPCA. The Health Authority shall in accordance with state law notify the MPCA of any inspection, installation, design, construction, alteration or repair of an ISTS by a licensed person or any pumping by a licensed pumper done in violation of tlic provisions of this Ordinance. SUBDIVISION 10: ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 10.1 Siting of an ISTS. Notwithstanding any state or federal requirements, the separation distance from an ISTS to a Type 3,4, 5 or 6 wetland shall be no less than fifty (50) feet. 10.2 Alternative and Experimental Systems. 10.21 Alternative and experimental systems are allowed only in areas where the Health Authority has determined that a standard system cannot be installed or is not the most suitable Irealmcnl. 10.22 Any required monitoring plan for an alternative ISTS is the responsibility ofthe ISTS Designer. The monitoring plan shall provide information as to: A. B. C. The specific modification to a standard system. The type and parameters for monitoring which shall be conducted to assure that the change will protect public health and the environment, including the monitoring time period and the and the person responsible for conducting the monitoring and reporting. A mitigation plan detailing what will be done if the system fails to meet the expectations established by the monitoring plan requirements. 10.23 Tiie results of the monitoring of an alternative ISTS shall be submitted in accordance with the approved monitoring plan to the Health Authority. 10.3 Warranted Systems. Warrantied systems, as discussed in Minn. Stat., Chapter 115.55, subd. 8, arc prohibited. 10.4 Maintenance Report. The owner of an ISTS or an owner’s agent who measures or removes accumulations in accord with i • ^ V 1 ^ Minn. Rules 7080.0175B shall submit records to the Health Authority of all pumping activities and recording fees. SUBDIVISION 11: ENFORCEMENT. 11.1 Any person, firm, corporation or other entity who violates any of the provisions of this Ordinance or who makes any false statement on a Certificate of Compliance, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment or a fine or both, as defined by law. Each day in violation may constitute a separate violation. 11.2 In the event of a violation of this Ordinance, in addition to other remedies, the County or Municipal Attorney may institute appropriate actions or proceedings to prevent, restrain, correct or abate such violations. SUBDIVISION 12: FEES. The Hennepin County Board shall from lime to time estab lish fees for activities undertaken by the Health Authority pursuant to this Ordi nance. Fees shall be due and payable at a time and in a manner to be determined by the Health Authority. mim SUBDIVISION 13: SEVERABILITY. If a provision or application of this Ordinance is held invalid, that in\'alidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance. SUBDIVISION 14: EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect January 1,2000. Passed by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota, this 28"' day of September, 1999. County of Hennepin State of Minnesota By : Chair, of CoiIQ of County Commissioners Attest: puty Clerk of the CounQr Board ! 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Council meeting 0 I 2000 C'TY Oh DATE: January 7,2000 ITEM NO: f / Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Annual Appointments and Designations - Resolution At the beginning of each year, the City Council makes a set of annual appointments and designations. A resolution designating selected appointments for 2000 is attached for Council consideration. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt a resolution designating selected appointments for the year 2000. i h I 11 la a It ■ w 7—M rr TfrfcMirfT <~-rnfiT mtm iimi i ifwiifci A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SELECTED APPOINTMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2000 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that the appointments and designations for the year 2000 are as follows: APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION 2000 Acting Mayor Planning Commission Rep. to Council Planning Commission Chair Parks, Trails, and Open Space Commission Chair Representative to Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislative Liaison AMM AMM Legislative Contact Lead Attorney (Civil) City Attorney Firm (Civil) Alternate Attorney Lead Prosecuting Attorney City Prosecuting Attorney Firm Lead Consulting Engineer City Engineering Firm Auditor Fiscal Agents Insurance Agent of Record Weed Inspector Assistant Weed Inspector Transportation Committee Emergency Preparedness Director Southwest Sanitary Sewer District Suburban Health Nursing Serv ice West Hennepin Recycling Commission Mavor's Association Alternate Liz Hawn Andrew McDermott Ronald J. Moorse Ronald J. Moorse Barbara Peterson Tom Barrett Hinshaw & Culbertson William Sofh. Dorsey & Whitney Kenneth N. Potts Kenneth N. Potts Glenn Cook Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderlik & Associates Malloy. Montague. Karnowski. Radosevich and Co.. P.A. Ehlers & Associates Carl Bennetsen, R. L. Youngdahl & Assoc., Inc. Gabriel Jabbour Greg Gappa Greg Gappa Gar>’ Cheswick Gary Chesw ick Ronald J. Moorse Ronald J. Moorse Lin Vee Gabriel Jabbour Page 1 of3 APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Suburban Rate Authority Westonka Senior Citizens Representative to Long Lake and Mound Fire Departments Building Code Board of Appeals Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization North Tonka Crime Prevention Coalition Highway 12 Appointments; Policy Committee Highway 12 Design Review Committee Housing and Redevelopment Authority Lake Minnetonka Cable Communication Commission Oflkial Newspaper Community Development Committee Dakota Rail Trail Committee 2000 Lili McMillan Greg Gappa Ronald J. Moorse (Alternate) Gabriel Jabbour Charles Kelley Barbara Peterson Loren Kohnen, West Metro Services Tom Anderson, Hopkins Building Official Maureen Bellows, AIA Architect Kenneth Roelofs, Building contractor .^tA^acant Position Ronald J. Moorse Gary Chesw'ick (Alternate) Gary Cheswick Barbara Peterson Gabriel Jabbour Ronald J. Moorse (Alternate) Edward J. Callahan, Jr. J. Diann Goetten Jim Murphy Ron Moorse Gabriel Jabbour, Chair Charles M. Kelley, Secretaiy Barbara Peterson Richard Flint Bob Sanseverc Timothv Pattrin Bob Sanseverc The Laker and Pioneer Newspaper Citv Planner Senior Planning Coordinator Public Ser\aces Director Richard Flint Bob Sanseverc Park Commission Chair, Andrew McDermott Rick Mever, Resident Page 2 of 3 APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION 2000 Official Depositories/Investment Vendors First National Banks of: The Lakes (Navarre) Wavzata Firstar Bank of Minnesota League of MN Cities - 4M Fund Salomon Smith Barney, St. Paul Norwest Investment Services, Inc., Mpls. U.S. Banks, Mpls. Piper Jaffray, Mpls. Dain Rauscher, Inc., Mpls. Prudential Securities, Inc., Mpls. Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc., Mpls.,ScottsdaIe, AZ Merrill Lynch, Mpls. Telebank, Arlington, VA Charter One Bank, FSB, Cleveland, OH First USA. Murray, UT Greenwood Trust. New Castle, DE Bank & Trust of Puerto Rico. Hato Rey, PR LaSalle Bank. FSB, Chicago, IL Safra National Bank of New York, New York. NY Key Bank USA, Cleveland, OH Branch County Fed S & L, Coldwater, MI New South Fed Savings Bank. Irondale, AL Peoples Bank, Bridgeport, CT Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held Januarj ’ II, 2000. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk ANNUALAP RES Gabriel Jabbour. Mavor Page 3 of 3 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: January 6,2000 ITEM NO: Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name Lin Vee h Cit>- Administrator’s Title City Clerk Report Item Description: Selection of Date for 2000 Local Board of Review Meeting The City recently received a request from the County Assessor to select a date for the 2000 Local Board of Review meeting by January 21,2000. Wednesday, April 26,2000, at 7:00 p.m. has been suggested by the County Assessor. Bill Davy, Orono's Assessor, has indicated this date is acceptable with him. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to establish April 26, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. as the date and time for the 2000 Local Board of Review meeting. ■1 ■ ■n—iillMrriM iiiiPiui ■ I n'W ■! JM 0 I 2000 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION j.p DATE: January 7,2000 ITEM NO: /3 Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Park Commission Reappointment Sherokee Use completed a three-year term on the Parks, Trails and Open Space Commission on December 31, 1999. She has indicated an interest in serving another three-year term on the Commission. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to reappoint Sherokee Use to a three-year term on the Parks, Trails and Open Space Commission expiring on December 31,2002. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION COJIWCIL MEETING JAN 0 1 2000 CITY Or Onuivo DATE: January 7, 2000 MITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed: M. Agenda Section: Cit>' Administrator's Report Item Description: Property Assessment Services The City’s agreement with Hennepin Count) for property assessment services expires on July 31, 2000. The agreement indicates that either parly may initiate an extension of the agreement for a term of four years by giving the other wxitten notice of its intent to so extend no less than 150 days prior to the termination of this agreement. If the party who receives said notice of intent to extend gives written notice to the other party of its desire not extend within 110 days prior to termination of the agreement, the agreement shall terminate on July 31, 2000. The agreement also indicates that nothing shall preclude the parties, prior to the end of the agreement, from agreeing to extend the contract for a term of four years. The 150 days prior to July 3 1 is March 3. The Council meeting prior to March 3 is on February 28. If the Council needs information to assist it in making a determination regarding an extension of the agreement, staff will provide it as soon as possible. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion regarding information needed by the Council to assist it in making a determination regarding an extension of the assessment services contract. .1I meETINQ JAN 0 1 2000. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION u»T wr OhONO DATE: January 6,2000 ITEM NO: / ^ Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse Title Citv Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator ’s Report Item Description: Year 2000 Non-Union Compensation Adjustments, Including Market-Based Pay Adjustments Attachments:I.Resolution Approving Pay Plan Adjustments for Non-Union City Employees for 2000 2. Non-Union Position/Point Groupings for 2000 3. Non-Union Pay Levels and Pay Ranges for 2000 The Council has previously approved adjustments to the City ’s non-union pay schedule of 2% effective 1/1/2000 and 1% effective 7/1/2000. The Council has also approved an increase in the City ’s insurance contribution from $345.00 per month to $370.00 per month. In addition to the normal annual pay adjustments, the attached 2000 pay schedule also reflects market-based pay adjustments. Market-Based Pay Adjustments The City ’s non-union compensation plan calls for the City ’s pay levels to be within 5% of the average pay level of cities in the metro area with populations between 5,000 and 15,000. Over the past eight years, the City has provided annual pay adjustments at a level comparable to those provided by cities of comparable size in the metro area and in the lake area. However, as the City became involved in hiring processes during the last year, it was found that the pay levels of a number of positions were not competitive with the market. Therefore, a market survey was completed to determine how the City's pay schedule compared to the pay levels of comparable cities. The sur\ey indicated the pay levels of several positions in the middle of the City ’s pay schedule were significantly below the market average. The City ’s pay schedule has been revised to increase the pay levels of these positions so that at a minimum they are within 5% of the market average. The attached table titled “2000 Pay Rates’’ shows the e.xtent of the market adjustments. The year 2000 budget includes funding for market-based pay adjustments. However, the extent of market adjustments was substantially beyond the level anticipated at the time the budget was developed. To enable the market adjustments to be made, and to stay within the budgeted amount, it is recommended the market-based adjustments be implemented in two stages-one-half effective January 1 ,2000 and one-half effective July 1,2000. These adjustments will coincide with the annual Request for Council Action continued Page 2 January 6,2000 Year 2000 Non-Union Compensation Adjustments. Including Market-Based Pay Adj ustments cost-of-living adjustments, which will be 2% effective 1/1/2000 and 1% effective 7/1/2000. The revised pay schedules reflecting both the market adjustments and the cost-of-living adjustments are attached. Part-Time Position Movement through the Pav Range The compensation plan has, in the past, limited regular part-time positions to the first two steps of the pay range. The part-time positions have not been eligible to move into the top two st"ps. Staff recommends changing the compensation plan to enable regular part-time staff to move through all four steps of the pay range. Because the part-time staff work less than 40 hours per week, it is recommended the regular part-time staff move through the pay steps as follows: Step 1 Starting rate Step 2 1 year anniversary Step 3 After 3,120 hours worked Step 4 After 5,200 hours worked COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution approving nay plan adjustments for non-union City employees for 2000. u Ivikr b 1 2000 Pay Rates January 3,2000 Position ‘99 Rate + 2.0% ‘99 Rate + Mkt. Adj. + 2.0% Difference (Market Adjustment) CSO $26,726 $26,826 $100 Receptionist $28,277 $28,356 $79 Police Records $30,091 $30,113 $22 ^ Admin. Support $31,926 $32,160 $234 U.B7Payroll $31,926 $34,540 $2,614 Deputy Clerk $34,068 $34,540 $472 Police Office Manager $34,068 $34,540 $472 P.W. Maintenance $34,068 $37,338 $3,270 X 8 = $26,160 Septic Inspector $36,996 $42,100 $5,104 Asst. Zoning Administrator $36,996 $42,100 $5,104 City Clerk $39,946 $44,880 $4,934 Building Inspector $43,005 $44,880 $1,875 Golf Supt.$39,946 $44,880 $4,934 Asst. Fin. Dir./IT $43,005 $47,841 $4,836 Building Official $46,371 $50,997 $4,626 P.W. Supt.$50,742 $58,630 $7,492 LIVROVCompenanon 2000 RESOLUTION APPROVING PAY PLAN ADJUSTMENTS FOR NON-UNION CITY EMPLOYEES FOR 2000 WHEREAS, the City Administrator is responsible for annually presenting a pay schedule for City employees, with the exception of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements: and WHEREAS, the City Administrator has presented the City Council with said pay schedule for calendar and budget year 2000, which pay schedule is attached hereto and hereby made a part of this resolution; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds have been appropriated in the proposed 2000 Annual Budget to fund the recommended pay schedule and such other matters of compensation as herein specified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Orono City Council as follows: 1. 2. 3. That the 2000 employee pay schedule; reflecting a 2.0% pay adjustment effective 1- 1 -2000, a 1 % pay adjustment effective 7-1 -2000, and market-based pay adjustments; attached hereto and made a part thereof, is approved. That the City's contribution toward the cost of employee group insurance increase to a maximum of $370.00 per month. That City employees using their own vehicles for approved work related business shall be compensated at a rate of $.325 ^er mile. Adopted by the Council 10th day of Januar>". 2000. Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor ATTEST: Linda S. Vee. Citv Clerk Page 1 of 1 Updated January 3« 2< CITY OF ORONO NON-UNION ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT/TECHNICAL/PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION PLAN POSITION/POINT GROUPINGS FOR 2000 1 45-47 46 Community Service Officer 2 48-50 49 Receptionist 3 51-54 52.5 Police Records 4 55-58 56.5 Administrative Support Assistant 5 59-61 60 Deputy Clerk/Secretary Payroll/Utility Billing Specialist Police Office Manager 6 62-65 63.5 Public Works Maintenance Worker LIKKOVCompcnution 2000 Increase 2.0% Pius Market Adj ______Step 1 Level City of Orono Compensation Plan Administrative Support/Technical/Public Works Pay Levels and Pay Ranges For 2000 Jan 1.2000 thru June 30.2000 Hourly Monthly Step II Hourly Monthly Step III Hourly Monthly Step IV Hourly Monthly 1 10.97 1,900.60 II.6I 2,012.40 1226 2,124.20 12.90 2,236.00 2 11.59 2,008.15 12.27 2,126.28 12.95 2244.41 13.63 2,362.53 3 12.31 2,133.39 13.03 2,258.88 13.76 2,384.37 14.48 2,509.87 4 13.10 2,270.41 13.87 2,403.96 14.64 2,537.51 15.41 2,671.07 5 14.02 2,429.53 14.84 2,572.44 15.67 2,715.35 16.49 2,858.27 6 14.59 2,528.24 15.44 2,676.96 16.30 2,825.68 17.16 2,974.40 tup.Tocfi.^ i: City of Orono Compensation Plan Administrative Support/Technical/Public Works Pay Levels and Pay Ranges For 2000 Jul 1.2000 thru Dec 31.2000 Increase Plus Market Adj Step 1 Step II Step III Step IV Level Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly 1 11.08 1,919.75 11.73 2,032.68 12.38 2.145.61 13.03 2,258.53 2 11.70 2,028.78 12.39 2,148.12 13.08 2,267.46 13.77 2,386.80 3 12.43 2,154.01 13.16 2,280.72 13.89 2,407.43 14.62 2,534.13 4 13.27 2,299.87 14.05 2,435.16 14.83 2,570.45 15.61 2,705.73 5 14.25 2,470.78 15.09 2,616.12 15.93 2,761.46 16.77 2,906.80 6 15.41 2,671.15 16.32 2,828.28 17.22 2,985.41 18.13 3,142.53 S«p_T#el«.PW II .r ---------------------------------------- Updated January 3,2000 CITY OF ORONO NON-UNION SUPERVISORY/ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION PLAN POSITION/POINT GROUPINGS FOR 2000 V 1 66-69 67.5 On-Site Septic Manager (E) Assistant Zoning Administrator (E) 2 70-74 72 City Clerk (E) Golf Course Supervisor (E) Building Inspector 3 75-79 77 Asst. Finance Director/MIS Coord (E) 4 80-85 82.5 Building Official (E) City Planner/Zoning Administrator (E) 5 86-91 88.5 Senior Planning Coordinator (E) Police Sergeant 6 92-97 94.5 Public Works Superintendent (E) 7 98- 104 101 8 105-111 108 Police Chief (E) Finance Director (E) Public Services Director (E) 9 112-118 115 10 119-126 122.5 City Administrator (E) (E) - Exempt LIN'AOVCompenuUon 2000 City of Orono Compensation Plan Supervisory/Administrative Employees Pay Levels and Pay Ranges For 2000 Jan 1.2000 thru June 30.2000 Increase 2.0% Plus Market Adj ______Step I Level Hourly Annual Step II Step 111 Hourly Annual Hourly Annual Step IV Hourly Annual 1 16.16 33,615.80 17.11 35,593.20 18.06 37,570.60 19.01 39,548.00 2 17.57 36,554.25 18.61 38,704.50 19.64 40,854.75 20.68 43,005.00 3 18.56 38,612.10 19.66 40,883.40 20.75 43,154.70 21.84 45,426.00 4 20.84 43,347.45 22.07 45,897.30 23.29 48,447.15 24.52 50,997.00 5 22.29 46,361.55 23.60 49,C 38.70 24.91 51,815.85 26.22 54,543.00 6 22.35 46,483.10 23.66 49,217.40 24.98 51,951.70 26.29 54,686.00 7 25.83 53,717.45 27.34 56,877.30 28.86 60,037.15 30.38 63,197.00 8 27.87 57,970.85 29.51 61,380.90 31.15 64,790.95 32.79 68,201.00 9 30.35 63,134.60 32.14 66,848.40 33.92 70,562.20 35.71 74,276.00 10 33.03 68,707.20 34.98 72,748.80 36.92 76,790.40 38.86 80,832.00 City of Orono Compensation Plan Supervisory/Administrative Employees Pay Levels and Pay Ranges For 2000 Increase Level 1.0% Plus Market Adj Step I Jull.21BOO thru Doc 31.2000 spill Step IVStep II St( Hourly Aimual Hourly Annual Hourly Annual Hourly Annual 1 17.38 36,142.85 18.40 38,268.90 19.42 40,394.95 20.44 42,521.00 2 18.52 38,528.80 19.61 40,795.20 20.70 43,061.60 21.79 45,328.00 3 19.75 41,071.15 20.91 43,487.10 22.07 45,903.05 23.23 48,319.00 4 21.05 43,780.95 22.29 46,356.30 23.52 48,931.65 24.76 51,507.00 5 22.51 46,824.80 23.84 49,579.20 25.16 52,333.60 26.48 55,088.00 6 24.20 50,333.60 25.62 53,294.40 27.05 56,255.20 28.47 59,216.00 7 26.08 54,254.65 27.62 57,446.10 29.15 60,637.55 30.69 63,829.00 8 28.15 58,550.55 29.81 61,994.70 31.46 65,438.85 33.12 68,883.00 9 30.66 63,766.15 32.46 67,517.10 34.26 71,268.05 36.07 75,019.00 10 33.36 69,394.00 35.33 73,476.00 37.29 77,558.00 39.25 81,640.00 iwAisifWtgMIPtytlt^ 8up«:.Adimi 12 ----r--------- k RESOLUTION NO. COIIMO,, meeting 0 I 2000 A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZI nS" ^ ^noi^o OFFICER KURT ERICKSON FOR TWENTY YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE WHEREAS, Kurt Erickson became a police officer with the Orono Police Department in Januar>\ 1980; and WHEREAS, Kurt Erickson has consistently performed his duties in a commendable manner; and WHEREAS, Kurt Erickson has received many commendations from the Department and letters of support from citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orono City Council does hereby recognize Officer Kurt Erickson for his twenty years of dedicated ser\ ice to the City and its citizens. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of Januarj', 2000. ATTEST; Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mavor coi iMr.ii meeting JAN 0 1 2000REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CIIY ur DATE: January 7,2000 ITEM NO: ) ^ Department Approval: Name Lin Vee Title Cit>' Clerk' Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: List of Licenses for Council Approval Agenda Section: Licenses RESIDENTIAL KENNEL LICENSE 1.D. Brian Fulmer 3505 W. Wayzata Boulevard 2.Tracey Morrow 3026 Casco Point Road 3.Eric & Kristal Wilson 2683 North Shore Drive ONE DAY GAMBLING (RESOLUTION) 1.Orono PTO Mid Winter Fun Fest - Orono Middle School Saturday, February 5. 2000 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed licenses. Date:December 28,1999 To:Lin Vee, City Clerk From:Gary Cheswick, Chief of Police Subject:Gambling Pemut I have reviewed the application submitted by the Orono PTO on behalf of the Mid Winter Fun Fest to hold a raffle. 1 have no objection to the issuance of this permit. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF ORONO PTO FOR A ONE DAY OFF-SITE GAMBLING PERMIT WHEREAS, the Orono PTO is licensed to conduct lawful gambling activities; and WHEREAS, the Orono PTO has proposed to conduct a one day off-site gambling activity (raffle) as part of its annual Mid Winter Fun Fest at the Orono Middle School on February 5.2000; and WHEREAS, the Orono PTO is required to obtain approval of the off-site gambling activity from the city in which the activity will occur. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Orono City Council does hereby approve the application of the Orono PTO to conduct a one day ofT-site gambling acti\ ity (raffle) at the Orono Middle School on Februaiy' 5,2000. Adopted at a regular meeting of the Orono City Council this 10th day of January, 2000. ATTEST:Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk RF SO ORD orono PTO ret Page 1 of 1 KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January \ to December 31.^19*^ y r CSOO Owner T><. PrvA ________________ ____________ ST^-rTTW T^UoO (include city and ap) Mailing Address (if different): _____________ ^ - <^OZ.C^Phone: (home) (^y\7JA^=^ - ______(work)_CM^ RESIDENTTAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application) ^ : L*^ H4%sl SI Z- . C3oC=sb (Vr, e-s:&sC3e>jnYv\_ Maximum No. ofdogs to be kept at one time:_i„i£jr " ^ (over 5 months of age) Principal Breed: •^COl Purpose for more than 2 dogs:___ Dogs normally kept: ____inside kennel structure COIVIMERCLAL Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: -rweLT^c-? ---- Business Activities: r*=^Qtei-ijrr-,V P-gtW ( example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: ^^\- Afi.-r Hours Contact: (name) !T!> (phone) - V'^'Z.C ) CA~2^ Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside_____^outside V both The undersigned hereby, makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kermel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only an does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises pnor to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any specia conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. Applicant Date For City Use Only Kennel inspected by Recommends Appro^l ^^/^Denlaj* Date !'9L I ~ by tv KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective January l,i9~ to December 31,19; ;pooc> Owner:c. L . o r ro lO Property Address: 3p~2-C p Cases pi ^______ (include city and zip) Mailing Address Of different):______________________ n,:.. SS3?/ Phone- niome'> UI2-- H7l ~0/S¥________fworkl Ccl^' -fc 5/5 residential Kennel License Fee; S25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: ________________ (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed:_______j>ccdle^ <f ot\e- fc>»c:->Noy>------------------------ Purpose for more than 2 dogs:. Dogs normally kept: X inside____^kerjiel structure COIVIMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:______________ Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name). (phone). Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only an does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City perm:sssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kernel license approval. /i/y y Applicant ^ -A^ -9 9 Date For City Use Only Kennel inspected by Recommends Approval Date /^ -21-99 Owner. KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Efifective January 1,19___to December 31,19 1 < 1*'* Property Address: Sho/< m/.v./5^3 9/ (include city and ap) Mailing Address (if different):____________________ Phone: fhome^ ^ RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: S25.00 (payment must accompany application>i::----^ Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: 3 (over 6 months of age) I'lAA^isn. yyy^L w Auumus ui Principal Breed: Sc\jU^ ?,/iHTwUy ^{>cLvl/\^^ Purpose for more than 2 dogs: Dogs normally kept: inside t/ kennel structure COMMERCLAL Kennel I ’:ense Fee: S150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:____________________________ Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, csC.) Normal Business Hours:____ After Hours Contact: (name)_ (phone). Dog runs/exercise areas are:inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel Licewe a^ specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises poor to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigne agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5,36 including any specia conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kermel license approval. 7^ Applicant Date For City Use Only Kermel inspected by Recommends Approval Denial Date 7 Jan 2000 Fri 11:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60437 60437 60437 60437 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 07-Jan-00 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLT-’UE 04-Nov-98 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLT/UE O4-NOV-90 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLTrJE Totals Check Number 60437 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLT/UE Check Number 60438 AL*S MASTER PLUMBING 60438 05-Jan-00 AL*S MASTER PLUMBING Totals Check Number 60438 AL*S MASTER PLUMBING Check Number 60439 ascom mailing systems 60439 05-Jan-00 ASCOM MAILING SYSTEMS Totals Check Number 60439 ASCOM MAILING SYSTEMS Check Number 60440 AT & T - 60440 OS-Jan-00 AT 6 T - Totals Check Number 60440 AT 6 T - Check Number 60141 AT 6T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV Check Number 60443 6044 3 BARTON SAND k GRAVEL 07-Jan-00 BARTON SAND k GRAVEL Totals Check Number 60443 BARTON SAND k GRAVEL Check Number 60444 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 60444 05-Jan-00 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INI Transaction Amount 341.39 15.23 15.22 371.84 127.75 127.75 185.75 185.75 12.84 12.84 5,047.90 5.047.,:^ 680.06 CO//, Page 1 A/o/r Comment. ’ 0 J 2QQ q CELL PHONE ON CALL PHONE ON CALL PHONE char (2^A^O REPAIR MENS RM - PD SALES TAX ON METER RENTAL LD AND FED CHGS 6C441 05-Jan-00 AT 6 T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV 74.39 FINAL PKT - CIVIL 1 Totals Check Number 60441 AT a T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV 74.39 Check Number 60442 AT k; T WIRELESS SERVICES 60442 19-Feb-90 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 10.24 CELLULAR CHAGS 60442 19-Feb-98 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 10.23 CELLULAR CHAOS 60442 19-Feb-98 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 65.40 CELLULAR CHAOS 60442 05-Jan-00 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 34.49 CELL PHONE SERVICE Totals Check Number 60442 AT a T WIRELESS SERVICES 120.36 CLS GRAVEL BASE WINTER ROAD PATCH 7 Jan 2000 Fri 11:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Check Number Date , Name Check Number 60444 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. Totals Check Number 60444 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. Check NundDer 60445 BLACKOWIAX & SON 60445 60445 60445 05-Jan-00 05-Jan-00 05-Jan-00 BLACKOWIAX k SON BLACKOWIAX k SON BLACKOWIAX k SON Totals Check Number 60445 BLACKOWIAX k SON Check Number 60446 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 60448 06-Jan-00 BUSINESS FORMS k ACCOUNTING Totals Check Number 60448 BUSINESS forms k accounting Check Number 60449 CARGILL SALT 60449 05-Jan-00 CARGILL SALT Totals Check Number 60449 CARGILL SALT Check Number 60450 CITY OF EDINA 60450 07-Jan-00 CITY OF EDINA Totals Check Number 60450 CITY OF EDINA Check Number 60451 CITY OF LONG LAKE 60451 05-Jan-00 CITY OF LONG LAKE Ttansactlon Amount 680.06 78.90 111.79 191.72 382.41 176.17 176.17 1,507.50 1,507.50 168.00 168.00 Comments WASTE SERVICE 11/99 WASTE SERVICE 11/99 WASTE SERVICE 11/99 60446 07-Jan-00 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC.2,604.99 3/4 MINUS ROCK Totals Check Number 60446 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS IN"*.2,604.99 Check Number 60447 BUDGET PRINTING 60447 05-Jin-C0 BUDGET PRINTING 2.13 LAMINATE ID CARO 60447 06-Jan-00 BUDGET PRINTING 2.13 LAMINATE 60447 06*Jan*00 BUDGET PRINTING 5.24 SHIPPING CHARGES Totals Check Number 60447 BUDGET PRINTING 9.50 Check Number 60448 BUSINESS FORMS k ACCOUNTING W2'S, ENVELOPES SOFTB^ER SALT 1999 WATER TESTING 2,140.20 1/2 CONSOLIDATION COSTS 7 Jan 2000 Pri 11:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Check MUnber Date Name Check Number 60451 60451 CITY OF LONG LAKE 05-Jan*00 CITY OP LONG LAKE Totals Check Number 60451 CITY OF LONG LAKE Check Number 60452 COFFEE MILL 60452 05-Jan-00 COFFEE MILL Totals Check Number 60452 COFFEE MILL Check Number 60453 CORNERKOUSE 60453 07-Jan-00 CORNERKOUSE Totals Check Number 60453 CORNERKOUSE Check Number 60454 DAHLGREN SKARDLOH k UBAN 60454 60454 07-Jan-00 07-Jan-00 DAKLGREN SKAROLOW k UBAN OAKLGREN SKARDLOH k UBAN To ils Check Number 60454 DAHLGREN SKARDLOH k UBAN Check Number 60455 DAHLKE TREE SERVICE 60455 60455 05-Jan-00 05-Jari-00 DAHLKE TREE SERVICE DAHLKE TREE SERVICE Totals Check Number 60455 DAHLKE TREE SERVICE Check Number 60456 DCA - HIRE ONLY 60456 60456 05-Jan-00 05-Jan-00 DCA - HIRE OMY DCA - HIRE ONLY Totals Check Number 60456 DCA - WIRE ONLY Check Number 60457 DE BAERE. DON 60457 05-Jan-00 DE BAERE. DON Totals Check Number 6045# DE BAERE, DON Check Namber 60458 DEMBOUSKI. JAY 60458 05-Jan-00 DEMBOUSKI, JAY Totals Check Nundber 60458 DEMBOUSKI, JAY Transaction Amount 7,076.18 9,216.38 279.00 279.00 1,174.00 1,174.00 200.89 1,590.38 1,791.27 280.00 2,640.00 2,920.00 866.74 248.38 1,115.12 86.99 86.99 181.69 181.69 Page 3 Comments FOAM SYST04, SAH - Ell COFFEE YEAR 2000 CONTRACT CITY LOGO FOR GRAPHICS COMP PLAN MAP CHRISTMAS BANNERS CLEAR TREES-NAVARRE PRK SPOIDINC ACCTS - 12/26/99 SPENDING ACCTS - 12/12/99 WORK BOATS REPLACE GLASSES 7 Jan 2000 Fri 11:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60459 60459 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP 05-Jan-00 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH C»OUP Totals Check Number 60459 DEPT OF ADM - INTERTECH GROUP Qieck Number 60460 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 60460 07-Jan-00 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Totals Check Number 60460 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Check Number 60461 DNR HATERS 60461 2B-Dec-98 DNR HATERS Totals Check Number 60461 DNR WATERS Check Number 60462 E-Z RECYCLING 60462 05-Jan-00 E-Z RECYCLING Totals Check Number 60462 E-Z RECYCLING Check Number 60463 EARL F. ANDERSON & ASSOC. 60463 05-Jan-00 EARL F. ANDERSON & ASSOC Totals Check Number 60463 EARL F. ANDERSON & ASSOC Check Number 60464 EKLUND TREE RECYCLING 60464 07-Jan-00 EKLUND TREE RECYCLING Totals Check Number 60464 EKLUND TREE RECYCLING Check Number 60465 ELDREDGE TRADING. INC 60465 07-Jan-00 ELDREDGE TRADING. INC Totals Check Number 60465 ELDREDGE TRADING. INC Check Number 60466 FORTIS BENEFITS 60466 07-Jan-00 FORTIS BENEFITS Totals Check Number 60466 FORTIS BENEFITS Check Number 60468 G 6 K SERVICES 6046S 05-Jan-00 G i K SERVICES Transaction Amount 190.40 190.40 510.00 510.00 50.00 50.00 5.697.72 5.697.72 230.68 230.68 112.00 112.00 57.75 57.75 765.15 765.15 8.61 Page 4 Comments PHONE SERVICE 11/99 CJDN CHARGES 1998 HTR PMPING FEE DECEMBER RECYCLING SRVC TRAIL SIGNS BRUSH DISPOSAL SHIRTS FOR RESALE LTD PREMIUM 1/2000 i UNIFORM - STEFFENHAGEN 7 Jan 2000 Check Register Check Number 60469 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 60469 60469 05-Jan-00 05-Jan-00 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC, GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC, Totals Oieck Number 60469 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC Check Number 60470 GREGORY, JAMES 60470 07-Jan-00 GREGORY, JAMES Totals Qieck Number 60470 GREGORl, JAMES Check NunHer 60471 H a L MESABI 60471 60471 60471 60471 OS-Jan-00 05-Jan-00 05-Jan-00 05-Jan-00 H a L MESABI H a L MESABI H a L MESABI H a L MESABI Totals Check Number 60471 H a L MESABI Check Number 60472 HARCO WATERWORKS CP 60472 07-Jan-00 HARCO WATERWORKS CP Totals Check Number 60472 HARCO waterworks cp Check Number 60473 HASET4AN. CAROLE 60473 05-Jan-00 KASEMAN, CAROLE 17.50 17.50 35.00 100.00 100.00 33.02 65.34 138.27 2,110.81 2,347.44 446.00 446.00 44.04 Page 5 rri 11:29 AM City of Orono Check Tranaaction Number Date Name Amount Comments Check Number 60468 G a K SERVICES 60468 05-Jan-00 G a K SERVICES 112.59 UNIFORMS 60468 05-Jan-00 G a k SERVICES 14.22 UNIFORM - RATHBUN 60468 05-Jan-00 G a K SERVICES 8.61 UNIFORM - STEFFENKAGEN 60468 05-Jan-00 G a K SERVICES 77.26 UNIFORMS 60468 05-Jan-00 G a k SERVICES 14.22 UNIFORM-RATHBUN 60468 05-Jan-00 G a K SERVICES 8.61 UNIFORM - .STEFFENHAGEN 60468 05-Jan-00 G a K SERVICES 114.56 UNIFORMS 60468 05-Jan-00 G a K SERVICES 14.22 UNIFORM - RATHBUN 60468 06-Jan-00 G a K SERVICES 8.61 UNIFORM - STEFFENKAGEN 60468 06-Jan-C0 G a K SERVICES 42.01 MAT SERVICE - CC 60468 06-Jan-00 G a K SERVICES 77.26 UNIFORMS 60468 06-Jan-00 G a K SERVICES 42.01 MAT SERVICE - ADM 60468 06-Jan-00 G a K SERVICES 86.44 MAT SERVICE - PW 60468 06-Jan-00 G a K SERVICES 56.14 MATS - PD 60468 06-Jan-00 G a K SERVICES 14.22 ONIFORM - RATHBUN Totals Check Number 60468 G a K SERVICES 699.59 LOCATES 11/99 LOCATES 11/99 STEEL TCW BOOTS PLOW BOLTS PLOW BOLTS PLOW BLADES PLOW BLADES ANNUAL SERVICE CONTRACT PERMIT MTOS 7 Jan 2000 Fri 11:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Humber Dar.*Name Qieck Humber 60473 HASEMAN« CAROLE Totals Check Number 60473 HASEMAN« CAROLE Check Humber 60474 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 60474 60474 07-Jan-00 C7-Jan-00 HENNEPIN COL^NTY SHERIFF HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Totals Check Number 60474 HENNEPIN 'XUNTY SHERIFF Check Number 60475 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-ACCT 60475 07-Jan-00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-ACCT Totals Check Number 60475 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER-ACCT Check Number 60476 HENNEPIN COUNTY - HEALTH 60476 07-Jan-00 HENNEPIN COUNTY - HEALTH Totals Check Number 60476 HENNEPIN COUNTY - HEALTH Qieck Number 60477 HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIGHT CO 60477 07-j£ui-00 HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIGHT CO Totals ChecK Number 60477 HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIGHT CO Check Number 60478 J H LARSON COMPANY 60478 05-Jan-00 J H LARSON COMPANY Totals Check Number 60478 J H LARSON COMPANY Check Nun^r 60479 KUEHN, THOMAS 60479 07-Jan-00 KUEHJi. THOMAS Totals Check Number 60479 KUEHN, THOMAS Check Number 60480 LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DIST. 60480 07-Jan-00 LAKE MTKA CCNSERVATICN DIST. Totals Check Number 60480 LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DIST. Check Number 60481 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS 60481 07-Jan-00 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS Transaction Amount 44.04 7,331.52 115.91 7,447.43 1,417.00 1,417.00 102.00 102.00 3,482.26 3,482.26 283.72 283.72 91.08 91.08 8.249.64 8.249.64 147.80 Page 6 Comments 1999 RADIO LEASE BOOKING FEES 11/99 JAIL CHARGES 11/99 2000 FOOD LICENSE 2000 IMPOUND SERVICE FEE LIGHT BULBS MILEAGE/GFOA CONF 2000 MBRSHIP LNO) j 1 4 ADV FOR EMPLOYMENT .’lA fc-» >. 7 Jan 2000 Prl 11:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 7 Check Number Date Name Check Number 60481 LAKBSHORB NBEKLY NEWS Totals Check Number 60481 LAKESHORB VfEEiaiY Check Number 60482 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN Totals Check Number 60488 MASUNE COMPANY Transaction Amount Comments 147.80 36.20 60482 07-Jan-00 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN 17.296.00 1ST HALF WORK COMP INS Totals Check Number 60482 LMCIT-BERKLEY ADMIN 17,296.00 Check Number 60483 LOGIS 60483 07-Jan-00 LOGIS 958.50 PIMS APPLICATION 10/99 Totals Check Number 60483 LOGIS 958.50 Check Number 60484 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 60484 06-Jan-00 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 1.31 CHIPPER PARTS 60484 06-Jan-00 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 29.65 FILTER 60484 06-Jan-00 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 26.09 PARTS 8425 60484 06-Jan-00 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 76.07 PARTS 8708 Totals Check Number 60484 LONG LAKE TRACTOR EQUIPMENT 133.12 Check Number 60485 M.A.M.A. 60485 05-Jan-00 M.A.M.A.48.00 LUNCHEON MEETING Totals Check Number 60485 M.A.M.A.48.00 Oieck Number 60486 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 60486 OS-Jan-00 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 159.33 DIRT SHOE RUNNER Totals Check Number 60486 MACQUEEN EQUIPMQIT 159.33 Check Number 60487 MALEFI 60487 60487 07-Jan-00 07-Jan-00 MALEFI MALEFI 20.00 20.00 MALEFI tCRSHP-B JOIOtSO MALEFI MBRSHP-TONCHBCK Totals Check Number 60487 MALEFI 40.OC Check Number 60488 MASUNE COMPANY 60488 06-Jan-00 MASUNE COMPANY 36.20 SHAKER BOTTLE 7 Jan 2000 Fri 11:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Nufflber Date Name Check Number 60409 60489 60489 60489 MEDICA CHOICE 07-Jan-00 MEDICA CHOICE 07-Jan-00 MEDICA CHOICE 07-Jan-00 MEDICA CHOICE Totals Check Number 60489 MEDICA CHOICE Check Number 60490 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 60490 07-Jan-00 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Totals Check Number 60490 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Check Number 60491 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER 60491 06-Jan-00 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER Totals Check Number 60491 MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER Qieck Number 60492 MGCSA 60492 07-Jan-00 MGCSA Totals Check Number 60492 MGCSA Check Number 60493 MINN COM4 60493 07-Jan-00 MINN COMM Totals Check Number 60493 MINN COMM Check Number 60494 MINNEGASCO 60494 60494 60494 05-Jan-00 05-Jan-00 05-Jan-00 MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO Totals Check Number 60494 MINNEGASCO Check Number 60495 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS 60495 05-Jan-00 Mir.TiESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS Totals Check Number 604 95 MirJNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS Check Number 6C496 MINNETONKA SPORTSMEN INC. 60496 07-Jan-00 MINNETONKix SPORTSMEN INC Totals Check Number 60496 MINNETONKA SPORTSMEN INC, Transaction Amount 202.22 202.22 281.38 685.82 22.716.00 22.716.00 13.513.50 13.513.50 30.00 30.00 4.34 4.34 11.18 565.59 1.647.08 2.223.05 217.60 217.60 35.00 35.00 Page 8 Comments MEDICA LON 1/2000 MEDICA LOM 1/2000 MEDICA LOW 1/2000 SEWER SERVICE 1/2000 SAC C31ARGES 11/99 MGCSA MEETING FEDERAL CHARGES-PAGERS GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE GAS SERVICE ADV FOR EMPLOYMENT 2000 ME.MBERSHIP 7 Jan 2000 Frl 11:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60497 60497 MN D.A.R.E. OFFICERS ASSOC. 07-Jan-00 MN D.A.R.E. OFFICERS ASSOC, Totals Check Number 60497 MN D.A.R.E. OFFICERS ASSOC. Check Number 60498 MN GO’n* FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN 60498 60498 07-Jan-00 07-Jan-00 MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN Totals Check Number 60498 MN GOVT FIN. OFFICER'S ASSN Check Number 60499 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 60499 60499 60499 60499 07-Jan-00 07-Jan-00 07-Jan-00 07-.'an-00 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Totals Check Number 60499 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Check Number 60500 MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 60500 07-Jan-00 MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION Totals Check Number 60500 MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION Check Number 60501 NOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC. 60501 07-Jan-00 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC. Totals Check Number 60501 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC. Check Number 60502 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 60502 07-Jan-00 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS Totals Check Number 60502 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS Check Number 60503 NEIL NELSON 6 ASSOCIATES 60503 07-Jan-00 NEIL NELSON & ASSOCIATES Totals Check Number 60503 NEIL NELSON 6 ASSOCIATES Qieck Nufl^r 60504 NSP 60504 07-Jan-00 NSP Transaction 185.00 185.00 138.35 138.35 144.00 144.00 350.00 350.00 1.179.59 Page 9 Amount Ccmroents 35.00 .^^€8ERSHIP - SCHOENHOFF 35.00 30.00 2:00 MBRSHIP MGFOA-KUBHN 30.00 MGrOA MMBRSHIP - 2000 60.00 185.00 CCL SYST OPER SEMINAR 185.00 CCL SYST OPER SEMINAR 185.00 CCL SYST OPER SEMINAR 185.00 CCL SYST OPER SEMINAR 740.00 MEMBERSHIP 2/1/2000-2001 REPAIR RADIO - 429 rIRA LIFE 1/2000 trn:ng-schoenhoff/b johns ELECTRICAL SERVICE r *iak i Jr r 7 Jan 2000 Fri 11:29 AM Check Number Date Check Number 60504 NSP 60504 06-Mar-99 60504 08-Jan-99 60504 29-Dec-98 60504 29-Dec-90 60504 29-DCC-90 Check Register City of Orono Name NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP Totals Check Number 60504 NSP Check Number 60505 office DEPOT 6050S 60505 60505 60505 60505 60505 60505 06-Jan-00 06-Jan-00 06-Jan-OO 06-Jan-00 06-Jan-00 06-Jan-00 06-Jan-00 OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT DEPOT Totals Check Number 60505 OFFICE DEPOT Check Number 60506 OMAN. LYLE Check Number 60507 60507 PENCE, CHRIS 05-Jan-00 PENCE, CHRIS Totals Check Number 60507 PENCE. CHRIS Check Number 60500 PETTIT. SANDRA K. 60508 05-Jan-00 PETTIT. SANDRA K Totals Check Number 60508 PETTIT. SANDRA K Check NuffJser 60509 pleaa 60509 07-Jan-00 PLEAA Totals Check Number 60509 PLEAA Transaction Amount 103.70 532.29 287.46 53.24 421.45 1,432.85 118.28 2,949.27 47.43 47.43 27.39 27.39 25.00 25.00 Page 10 Comments 126.70 HIGHWAY 12 k WILLOW 105.78 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 1,352.45 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 3,448.92 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 1,958.66 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 0.172.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES TAVRCN BACKUP TAPES OFFICE SUPPLIES WORKS 2000 -JT*/ PROCSUM OFFICE SUPPLIES LAPTOP COMP-JL”/ PROGRAM RUBBER STAMPS 60506 07-Jan-00 OMAN. LYLE 33.97 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 60506 07-Jan-00 OMAN. LYLE 17.16 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 60506 07-Jan-00 OMAN. LYLE 47.85 MILEAGE REIMBURESMENT 60506 05-Jan-00 OMAN, LYLE 27.72 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 605C6 05-Jan-00 OMAN. LYLE 34.32 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 63506 05-Jan-00 OMAN. LYLE 30.36 MILEAGE RI.IMBURSEMENT 60506 0*^-Jan-00 OMAN, LYLE 66.99 MTLEAGE REIMBURSEMENT Totals Check Number 60506 OMA27, LYLE 258.39 ISTS WORKSHOP/MEAL-MLAGE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT PLEAA MEMBERSKIP-BOBZIEN 7 Jan 2000 Pri 11:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60510 60510 PCWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. 07-Jan-00 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. Totals Check Number 60510 POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. Check Number 60511 PROTECTION ONE 60511 07-Jan-00 PROTECTION ONE Totals Check Number 60511 PROTECTION ONE Check Number 60512 Srw LIKE NEW 60512 07-Jan-00 SEW LIKE NEW Totals Check Number 60512 i’ZW LIKE NEW Check Number 60513 SKREEN, DALE 60513 05-Jan-00 SKREEN, DALE Tot^ 1 Check Number 60513 SKREEN, DALE Check Number 60514 STAR TRIBUNE 60514 06-Jan-00 STAR TRIBUNE Totals Check Number 60514 STAR TRIBUNE Check Number 60515 STErFENHAGEN, RON 60515 06-Jan-00 STEFFENHAGEN, RON Totals Check Number 60515 STEFFENHAGEN, RON Check Number 60516 STRIN ER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 60SI6 05-Jan-00 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS Totals Check Number 60516 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTD1S Check Number 60517 SUSLTIBAN TIRE INC. 60517 60517 05-Jan-00 OS-Jan-CO SUBURBAN TIRE INC. SUBURBAN TIRE INC. Totals Check Number O0517 SUBURBAN TIRE INC. Check Number 60518 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERV. INC. Transaction Amount 1.7^5.84 1,725.84 168.99 168.99 155.38 155.38 73.40 73.40 416.00 416.00 24.62 24.62 230.02 230.02 460.78 461.10 921.88 Page 11 Corments JANITORIAL 12/99 FIRE ALARM MONITORING PATCHES. ALTER7*TI0NS 1999 SAFETY BOATS ADV FOR EMPLOYMErrr MEALS/PRKING MTGF CONF TONER FOR FAX TIRES i708 TIRES 11712 f ! 7 Jan 2000 Fri 11:29 AM Check Register City o£ Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 6051B 60518 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERV. INC. 05-Jar.-00 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERV. INC, Totals Check Number 60518 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERV. INC. Check Number 60519 TEE'S PLUS 60519 07-Jan-00 TEE'S PLUS Totals Check Number 60519 TEE'S PLUS Ctieck Number 6052C TEMPORARIES-TO-GO 60520 60520 60520 60520 05-Jan-00 05-Jar.-00 05-Jan-00 05-Jar.-00 TEMPORARIES-TO-GO TEMPORARIES-TO-GO TEMPORARIES-TO-GO TEMPORARIES-TO-GO Totals Check Number 60520 TEMPORARIES-TO GO Check Number 60521 THE HOME DEPOT 60521 05-Jan-00 THE HOME DEPOT Totals Check Number 60521 THE HOME DEPOT Check Number 60522 TIM BUSSE 60522 05-Jan-00 TIM BUSSE Totals Check Number 60522 TIM BUSSE Check Number 60523 TRACY TRIPP FUELS 60523 05-Jar.-00 TRAC£ TRIPP FUELS Totals Check Number h/623 TRACY TRIPP FtrELS Check Number 60524 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 60524 05-Jan-00 TREADWAY GRAPHICS Totals Check ?Jumber 60524 TRFADWAY GRAPH.^CS Check Number 60525 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 60525 05-Jan-00 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Transaction Amount 570.00 570.00 168.67 1C8.67 324.00 50.00 324.00 364.50 1«062.50 143.80 143.80 1,507.50 1,507.50 2,348.64 2,348.64 138.86 138.86 187.00 Page 12 Comments VAC TRX AND DRIVER DARE SUPPLIES TEMP HELP WK END 12/26/99 TEMP HELP - HOLIDAY LUNC4 TEMP HELP-WK END 12/19/99 TEMP HELP-WK END 12/12/99 MATS CONSLDTION COM 10-11/99 1731.9 GALS UNLEADED DARE 5?UPPLIES SHIRT, TROUSERS t 7 Jan 2000 rri 11:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60525 60525 60525 60525 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 05-Jan-00 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 05-Jan-00 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 05-Jan-00 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Totals Check Number 60525 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Check Number 60526 united states postal service 60526 06-Jan-00 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Totals Check Number 60526 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Check Number 60527 UNIV OF MINNESOTA 60527 07-Jan-00 UNIV OF MINNESOTA Totals Check Number 60527 UNIV OF MINNESOTA Check Number 60528 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 60528 07-Jan-00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Totals Check Number 60528 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Check Number 60529 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Check Number 60530 VEE. LIN 60530 05-Jan-00 VEE, LIN Totals Check Number 60530 VEE, LIN Qitck Number 60531 WARNING LITES OF MN 60531 06-Jan-00 WARNING LITES OF MN Totals Check Number 60531 WARNING LITES OF MN Check Number 60532 WESTONKA FOOD SHELF Transaction Amount 104.26 174.46 157.09 623.61 44.00 44.00 210.00 210.00 50.00 50.00 32.68 32.68 105.44 105.44 Page 13 Comments SHIRT, GLOVES SWEATER, SHOES CSO PATCHES PARNIOK PBRSELL PO BOX RENTAL MN JUV OFCRS CONF-SCHOENH EQUIPMENT MGKT-DEBAERE 60529 04-Feb-S8 US WEST CO»«1UNICATIONS 235.84 PHONE SDIVICE 60529 04-Feb-9S US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 67.15 PHONE SERVICE 60529 04-Feb-98 US WEST COmUNICATIONS 28.78 PHONE SERVICE 60529 04-Feb-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 863.38 PHONE SERVICE 60529 04-Feb-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 43.41 PHONE SERVICE 60529 04-Feb-98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 54.18 PHONE SERVICE Totals Check Number 60529 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 1,292.74 MILEAGE/TRAINING BARRICADE R^AL 7 Jan 2000 Fri 11:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60532 60532 WESTONKA FOOD SHELF 07-Jan-00 WESTONKA FOOD SHELF Totals Check Number 60532 WESTONKA FOOD SHELF Check Number 60*^33 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 60533 05-Jan-00 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT Totals Check Number 60533 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT Check Number 60534 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 60534 60534 05-Jan-00 05-Jan-00 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE Totals Check Number 60534 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE Check Number 60535 WOLF. LANETTE 60535 7-Jan-OO WOLF, LANETTE Totals Check Number 60535 WOLF. LANETTE Check Number 60536 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 60536 60536 07-Jan-99 07.’ . . 99 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Totals Check Nur^er 60536 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Grand Total Transaction Amount 50.00 50.00 101.90 101.90 10.00 24.00 34.00 225.00 225.00 B.OO 27.02 35.02 144.430.29 Page 14 Comments MEMORIAL DONATION TIRE REPAIR TIRE REPAIR TIRE REPAIR COUNCIL MINUTES-12/13/«9 ELECTRICAL SERVICE ELECTRICAL SERVICE } \ 7 Jan 2000 Pri 11:29 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 15 Finance User Initials RJO Friday 7 January 2000 11:29 AM Start 11:29 AM Finish Buffer Name History Records Read Records Selected Number of Pages 1189 175 15 Selected by Check/receipt Date Equal To lO-Jan-00 Sorted by Check Number Totals No Page Breaks 15 D«e 1999 Med 11:24 AM Check Register City of Orono Qierk Number Employee Name Check Number 046938 046938 JOHNSON, MARY ANN Totals Check Number 046938 Check Number 046939 046939 VEB, LINDA S. Totals Check Nun^r 046939 Check Number 046940 046940 BERRY* HEIDI N. Totals Check Number 046940 Check Number 046941 046941 HASEMAN, CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 046941 Check Number 046942 046942 MOOR5E* RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046942 Check Number 046943 046943 PETTIT* SANDRA K. Totals Check Number 046943 Check Number 046944 046944 KUEHN* THOMAS M. Totals Check Number 046944 Check Number 046945 046945 OLSON, RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046945 Check NUnyber 046946 Check Date 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 Page 1 Check Amount 522.29 522.29 1,072.10 1,072.10 697.70 697.70 683.49 683.49 1,617.42 1,617.42 410.90 410.90 1,019.22 1,019.22 28.53 28.53 15 Dec 1999 Ned 11:24 AM Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046946 046946 MORONCZYNSKI. JAMES Totals Check Number 046946 Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Check Number 046947 046947 JOHNSON, JEFFREY Totals Check Number 046947 Check Number 046948 046948 MADSON, ADRIENNE M. Totals Check Number 046948 Check Number 046949 046949 FISCHENICH, DAN T. Totals Check Number 046949 Check Number 046950 046950 MCNALLY, STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 046950 Check Number 046951 046951 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. Totals Check Number 046951 Check Number 046952 046952 CORNICK, JAMES L. Totals Check Number 046952 Check Number 046953 046953 FISCHER, CHRISTOPHER K Totals Check Number 046953 Check Number 046954 Check Date 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 lS-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 lb-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 Check Amount 1,538.09 1,538.09 548.15 548.15 409.56 409.56 1,171.90 1,171.90 1,159.93 1,159.93 281.20 281.20 1,416.78 1,416.78 1,270.53 1,270.53 046954 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B,15-Dec-99 1,279.61 X5 Dec 1999 Med 11:24 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number En^loyee Name Check Number 046954 Totals Check Number 046954 Qieck Number 046955 046955 TOMCZYK, MARK M. Totals Check Number 046955 Check Number 046956 046956 PERSFLL, WILLIAM R. Totals Check Number 046956 Check Number 046957 046957 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 046957 Check Number 046958 046958 ANDERSON, BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 046958 Check Number 046959 046959 CHESWICK, GARY B. Totals Check Number 046959 Check Number 046960 046960 ERICKSON, KURT R Totals Check Number 046960 Check Number 046961 046961 aOBZIEN, SUE A. Totals Check Number 046961 Check Number 046962 046962 TOMC ECK, LAWRENCE F Check Date 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 )5-Dec-99 Page 3 Check Amount 1,279.61 1,284.62 1,284.62 389 65 389.65 1,264.10 1,264.10 616.81 616.81 1,519.16 1,519.16 457.70 457.70 657.24 657.24 428.96 15 Dec 1999 Ned 11:24 AH Check Register City of Orono Check Huaiber Employee Name Check Number 046962 Totals Check Number 046962 Check Number 046963 046963 FARNIOK, CORREY L. Totals Check Number 046963 Check Number 046964 046964 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C. Totals Check Number 046964 Check Number 046965 046965 NITTXE. ANTHONY A. Totals Check Number 04696S Check Number 046966 046966 BORIS, SCOTT W. Totals Check Number 046966 Check Number 046967 046967 NCNICHOLS* DAVID L. Totals Check Number 046967 Check Number 046968 046968 HOECHST, ROBYN A. Totals Check Number 046968 Check Number 046969 046969 JENSEN, CHRISTOPHER E. Totals Check Number 046969 Check Number 046970 046970 GAPPA, GREGORY A. Totals Oieck Number 046970 Check Date 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15 Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 Page 4 Check Amount 428.96 1,502.09 1,502.09 1,255.22 X,255.22 329.58 329.58 1,169.46 1,169.46 595.79 595.79 545.75 545.75 499.94 499.94 1,569.51 1,569.51 IS Dec 1999 Hed lit24 AM Oieck Number Employee Name Check Regiater City of Orono Check Date Page 5 Check Amount Check Number 046971 046971 PENCE. CHRISTOPHER M. Totals Check Number 046971 Check Number 046972 046972 GAFFRON. MICHAEL P. Totals Check Number 046972 Check Number 046973 046973 OMAN. LYLE E. Totals Check Number 046973 Check Number 046974 046974 WEINBERGER. PAUL E. Totals Check Number 046974 Check Number 046975 046975 BOTTENBBRG. WENDY C. Totals Check Number 046975 Check Number 046976 046976 MEYER. WILLIAM C. Totals Check Number 046976 Check Number 046977 046977 DAVIS. MARK L. Totals Check Number 046977 Check Nundser 046978 046970 OBERAIGNER. SCOTT G. Totals Check Number 046978 Check Number 046979 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 811.54 811.54 1.166.59 1.168.59 315.34 315.34 1.064.02 1.064.02 974.09 974.09 419.46 419.46 1.038.93 1.038.93 653.42 653.42 046979 SKREEN. DALE S.lS-Dec-99 770.97 15 Dec 1999 Ned 11:24 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046979 Totals Check Number 046979 Check Number 046980 046980 PALMER. GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 046980 Check Number 046981 046981 DBBAERE. DONALD L. Totals Check Number 046981 Check Number 046982 046982 RATHBUN. BARRY J. Totals Check Number 046982 Check Number 046983 046983 GREGORY. JAMES D. Totals Check Number 046983 Check Number 046984 046984 BRINKHAUS. JOHN F. Totals Check Number 046984 Check Number 046985 046985 OBRIEN. RANDY L. Totals Check Number 046985 Check Number 046985 046986 HANSEN. STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 046986 Check Number 046987 046987 STEFPENHAGEN. RONALD E Check Date 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 lS-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 Page 6 Check Amount 770.97 545.64 545.64 887.83 887.83 1185.70 886.70 591.57 591.57 1.121.74 1.121.74 384.89 384.89 554.01 654.01 1.097.20 15 Dec 1999 Ned 11:24 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 7 Check Number Employee Name Check Date Check Amount Check Number 046987 Totals Check Nun^r 046987 1,097.20 Grand Total 42,699.72 3 Jan 2000 Mon 1:33 PM Check Register City of Orono Check Number Date Name Check Number 60411 60411 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 15-Dec-99 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Totals Check Number 60411 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Number 60412 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES 60412 60412 60412 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Totals Check Number 60412 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OP LAKES Check Number 60413 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 60413 15-Dec-99 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Totals Check Number i0413 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Check Number 60414 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 60414 15-Dec-99 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Totals Check Number 60414 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Check Number 60415 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT 60415 15-Dec-99 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Totals Check Number 60415 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Check Number 60416 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Check Number 60410 PEBSCO/OBRA 60418 15-DCC-99 PEBSCO/OBRA Transaction Amount 7.039.00 7.039.00 3.750.59 3.750.59 11.341.86 18.843.04 275.00 275.00 462.00 462.00 179.51 179.51 60416 15-Dec-99 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 4.322.05 Totals Check Number 60416 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 4.322.05 Check Number 60417 ORCHARD TRUST CO.TRUSTEE/CUST 60417 15-Dec-99 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 931.60 60417 15-Dec-99 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 769.00 60417 15-Dec-99 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 277.00 Totals Check Number 60417 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 1.977.68 0.00 Page 1 Comments SAVINGS W/H a TRANSFERRED FICA a MEDICARE W/H FICA.MEDCR CITY SHARE FEDERAL WITHHOLDING DEFERRED COMP W/H UNION DUES WH SKREEN 80010755723 STATE TAX W/H DEFCCMP-90995-01 D10O DEF COMP DEF COMP OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H J 3 Jan 2000 Mon 1:33 PM Check Number Check Register City of Orono Date Name cnee/. Number 60418 PEBSCO/OBRA Totals Check Number 60418 PEBSCO/OBRA Check Number 60419 60419 PEBSCO/US CONF OP MAYORS 15-Dec-99 Totals Check Number PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 60419 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS Check Number 60420 60420 60420 PERA 15-DCC-99 15-Dec-99 Totals Check Number PERA TERA 60420 PERA Check Number 60421 60421 60421 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 15-Dec-99 15-Dec-99 Totals Check N'lmber PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 60421 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Check Number 60422 60422 tJNITED WAY 15-Dec-99 Totals Check Number UNITED WAY 60422 UNITED WAY Grand Total Transaction Amount 0.00 2*221.70 2*221.70 3*930.15 5*229.19 9*159.34 1*484.74 2*227.08 3*711.82 31.00 31.00 48*222.14 Page 2 Comments USCM DEFERRED COMP W/H pERA EMPLOYEE W/H PERA CITY SHARE employee share /pera city share /pera CHARITY DONATIONS W/H 28 Dec 1999 Tue 7:07 AM Qieck Register City of Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 046990 046990 JOHNSON. MARY ANN Totals Check Number 046990 Check Number 046991 046991 BERRY. HEIDI N. Totals Check Number 046991 Check Number 046992 046992 HASEMAN. CAROLE A. Totals Check Number 046992 Check Number 046993 046993 MOORSE. RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046993 Check Number 046994 046994 VEE. LINDA S. Totals Check Numbei 046994 Check Number 046995 046995 KUEHN. THOMAS M. Totals Check Number 046995 Check Number 046996 046996 OLSON. RONALD J. Totals Check Number 046996 Check Number 046997 046997 PETTIT. SANDRA K. Totals Check Number 046997 Check Number 046998 Check Date 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 Page 1 Check Amount 499.50 499.50 655.34 655.34 663.06 663.06 1.876.68 1.876.68 1.049.97 1.049.97 1.117.50 1.117.50 126.28 126.26 334.43 334.43 26 Dec 1999 Tue 7:07 AM Check Number i^loyee Name Check Number 046998 046998 ANDERSON, BRUCE L. Totals Check Number 046998 Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Check Date 29-DCC-99 Check Amount 1,117.16 1,117.16 Check Number 046999 046999 BOBZIEN, SUE A. Totals Check Number 046999 29-Dec-99 775.24 775.24 Check Number 047000 047000 BORIS, SCOTT W. Totals Check Number 047000 29-Dec-99 1,175.46 1,175.46 Check Number 047001 047001 CARLSON, MICHAEL B. Totals Check Number 047001 29-Dec-99 321.37 321.37 Check Number 047002 047002 CHESWICK, GARY B. Totals Check Number 047002 29-Dec-99 1,503.12 1,503.12 Check Number 047003 047003 CORNICK, JAMES L. Totals Check Number 047003 Check Number 047004 047004 DEMBOUSKI, JAY C. Totals Check Number 047004 29-Dec-99 29-DCC-99 1,461.80 1,461.00 1,201.62 1,201.82 Check Number 047005 047005 ERICKSON, KURT R Totals Check Number 047005 29-Dec-99 1,453.23 1,453.23 Check Number 047006 047006 FARNIOK, CORREY L,29-Dec-99 1,461.49 2S Dec 1999 Tue 7:07 AM Check Number Employee Name Check Number 047006 Totals Check Number 047006 Check Number 047007 047007 PISCHENICH. DAN T. Totals Check Number 047007 Check Number 047008 047008 FISCHER, CHRXSTOPISR K. Totals Check Number 047008 Check Number 047009 047009 JOHNSON, JEFFREY Totals Check Number 047009 Check Register City of Orono Page 3 Check Number 047010 047010 JOHNSON, BRADLEY P. Totals Check Number 047010 Check Number 047011 047011 MAOSON, ADRIENNE M. Totals Check Number 047011 Check Number 047012 047012 MCNALLY, STEVEN A. Totals Check Number 047012 Check Number 0470X3 047013 MCNICHOLS, DAVID L. Totals Check Number 047013 Check Number 047014 047014 MOROHCZYNSKI, JAMES Check Date 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 Check Amount 1,461.49 1,268.48 1,268.48 1,399.73 1,399.73 741.94 741.94 1,470.51 1,470.51 544.73 544.73 1,185.68 1,185.68 675.01 675.01 29-Dec-99 1,645.41 r 28 Dec 1999 Tue 7:07 AN Check Register City of Orono Check Number employee Name Check Number 047014 Totals Check Number 047014 Check Number 047015 047015 PERSELL, tfILLIAM R. Totals Check Number 047015 Check Number 047016 047016 SCHOENHOFF, JOHN B. Totals Check Number 047016 Check Number 047017 047017 TOMCHECK, LAVfRENCE F. Totals Check Number 047017 Check Number 047010 047018 TOMCZYK, MARK W. Totals Check Number 047018 Check Humber 047019 047019 WITTKB« ANTHONY A. Totals Check Number 047019 Check Number 047020 047020 HENDRICKS. RONALD J. Totals Check Number 047020 Check Number 047021 047021 JENSEN, CHRISTOPHER E. Totals Check Number 047021 Check Number 047022 047022 BOTTENBERG, WENDY C. Totals Check Number 047022 Check Date 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-DCC-99 29-Dec-99 29-DCC-99 29-Dec-99 Page 4 Check Amount 1,645.41 209.42 209.42 1,403.09 1,403.09 606.97 606.97 1,416.32 1,416.32 324.69 324.69 498.86 498.86 279.01 279.01 097.74 897.74 i 1 28 Dec 1999 Tue 7:07 AM Check Register City of Orono Check Nunber Employee Name Check Number 047023 047023 DAVIS, MARK L. Totals Check Number 047023 Check Number 047024 047024 QAPFRON, MICHAEL R. Totals Check Number 047024 Check Number 047025 047025 QAPPA, GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 047025 Check Number 047026 047026 MEYER, NILLIAM C. Totals Check Number 047026 Check Number 047027 047027 OMAN, LYLE E. Totals Check Number 047027 Check Number 047028 047028 PENCE, CHRISTOPHER M. Totals Check Number 047028 Check Number 047029 047029 WEINBERGER, PAUL E. Totals Check Number 047029 Check Number 047030 047030 BRINKHAUS, JOHN P. Totals Check Number 047030 Check Number 047031 047031 DEBAERE, DONALD L Check Date 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec*99 29-DeC'99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 Page 5 Check Amount 1,030.60 1,030.60 1,153.84 1,153.84 1,671.09 1,671.09 346.90 346.90 299.94 299.94 876.05 876.05 1,018.44 1,018.44 1,09*;.97 1,097.97 937.34 1 i i . TTt [!"■ t tWPilt ' *iini itit • I I vi i itn >*■■■.mAh J 28 Dec 1999 Tue 7:07 AM Check Register City o£ Orono Check Number Employee Name Check Number 047031 Totals Check Number 047031 Check Number 047032 047032 GREGORY* JAMES D. Totals Check Number 047032 Check Number 047033 047033 HANSEN* STEVEN C. Totals Check Number 047033 Check Number 047034 047034 OBERAIGNER* SCOTT G. Totals Check Number 047034 Check Number 047035 047035 OBRIEN* RANDY L. Totals Check Number 047035 Check Number 047036 047036 PALMER* GREGORY A. Totals Check Number 047036 Check Number 047037 047037 RATHBUN* BARRY J. Totals Oieck Number 047037 Check Number 047038 047038 SKREEN* DALE S. Totals Check Number 047038 Check Number 047039 C47039 STEFFENHAGEN* RONALD E, Check Date 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-DCC-99 29-Dec-99 Page 6 Check Amount 937.34 1*206.17 1*206.17 933.90 933.90 714.42 714.42 198.16 198.16 1*134.76 1*134.76 944.84 944.84 745.30 745.30 1*180.41 I II jm-ari -<l T I I • I it"_ _ _ _ _ 1 28 Dec 1999 Tue 7:07 AM Check Register City of Orono Page 7 Check Number Buployee Name Check Date Check Amount Check Number 0470^9 Totals Check Number 047039 1*180.41 Grand Total 46.851.17 ■ aiMu ^AV■j»vr-f<rrTi *rui lUjjnth #:na.t^t:Jsm^a 28 Dec 1999 Tue 12:39 PM Check Number Check Number 60425 Check Register City of Orono Date Name 60425 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 29-Dec-99 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Totals Check Number 60425 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION Check Number 60426 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OP LAKES 60426 60426 60426 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Totals Check Number 60426 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES Check Number 60427 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 60427 29-DCC-99 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Totals Check Number 60427 ICMA retirement trust - 457 Check Number 60428 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE 60428 29-Dec-99 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Totals Check Number 60428 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE Check Number 60429 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT 60429 29-Dec-99 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Totals Check Number 60429 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PMT CT Check Number 60430 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 60430 29-Dec-99 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Totals Check Number 60430 MN dept of revenue Check Number 60431 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 60431 60431 60431 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 Totals Check Number 60431 ORCHARD TRU5 Check Number 60432 PEBSCO/OBRA 60432 29-Dec-99 PEBSCO/OBRA Transaction Amount 7,039.00 7,039.00 3,408.86 3,408.86 8,975.76 15,793.48 275.00 275.00 0.00 0.00 179.51 179.51 3,460.12 3,460.12 Page 1 Comments SAVINGS W/H 6 TRANSFERRED FICA & MEDICARE W/H FICA,MEDCR CITY SHARE FEDERAL WITHHOLDING DEFERRED COMP W/H UNION DUES WH SKREEN 80010755723 STATE TAX W/K CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 896.00 DEFCOMP-98995-01 D180 CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 724.00 DEF COMP CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 250.00 DEF COMP CO. TRUSTEE/CUST 1,870.00 0.00 OBRA DEFERRED COMP W/H 28 Dec 1999 Tue 12:39 PM Check Register City of Orono Page 2 Check Number Date Name Check Number 60432 pEBSCO/OBRA Totals Check Number 60432 PEBSCO/OBRA r*eck Number 60433 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS 60433 29-Dec-99 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS Totals Check Number 60433 PEBSCO/US CONF OF MAYORS Check Number 60434 PERA 60434 60434 29-Dec-99 29-Dec-99 PERA PERA Totals Check Number 60434 PERA Check Number 60435 UNITED WAY 60435 29-Dec-99 UNITED WAY Totals Check Number 60435 UNITED WAY Grand Total Transaction Amount Comments 0.00 1,987.70 1,987.70 USCM DEFERRED COMP W/H 4,209.09 5,478.96 PERA EMPLOYEE W/H PERA CITY SHARE 9,688.05 31.00 31.00 CHARITY DONATIONS W/H I'liaakir •r 'I'lii’i ■ iiiii'i11 ■ ■ ■■' ~ YEAR-TO-DATE REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RON 12/01/99 PERMIT TYPE Building SGL FAMILY-NEW DUPLEX-NEW SF-ADD/REMODEL SF-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COMMERCIAL-NEW COM-ADD/RFMODEL CC»4-ACC STRUCTUR DEMO INST-ADD/REMODEL DEMO-ACCESSORY ACC/GARA6ES Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING WOOD STOVE/FLUB FIREPLACE VE»JTILATION FUEL STORAGE GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-total Plumbing FIXTURES SPRINKLER WATER METER VACUUM BREAKER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sewer fc Water SEWER CONNECTION WATER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE DRNFLD a/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEPTIC CONNECTIN SEWER DISCONNECT SEWER REPAIR SEWER a WATER UNDEFINED Sub-total sign PERMANENT/POSTED QTY 42 1 305 37 19 1 8 1 0 2 5 12 433* 127 17 5 81 10 2 25 8 8 283* 159 1 12 4 4 180* 24 1 30 2 17 0 2 5 8 1 90* ***** permit ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO ***** -- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/99 - 11/30/99 BASE FEE 104,608 1,637 95,526 5,723 1,220 3,099 1,075 237 0 963 150 5,241 220,283 .75 .25 .70 .05 .00 .75 .50 .25 .00 .50 .00 .25 .00* 14,604 839 177 3,636 407 410 915 338 2,672 24,000 .53 .13 .50 .03 .50 .00 .00 .75 .55 .99* 14,618.04 93.75 6,560.00 140.00 140.00 21,551.79* 840 35 2,870 100 19,950 0 105 175 5d0 35 24,670 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00* 48.50 VALUATION 16,908 250 8,976 332 550 135 13 88 420 27,676 ,961 ,000 ,752 ,960 0 ,000 • 175 , 900 0 ,000 0 ,725 ,474 .55 .00 .85 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .40* 1,140,958.90 55,885.50 5,600.00 218,457.09 10.215.00 32.800.00 20.300.00 14.750.00 205,133.79 1,712,101.00* 1,055,302.89 7.500.00 23,250.00 800.00 4.408.00 1,091,340.89* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00* 1,500.00 PLAN REVIEW QTY COUNCIL W»=ET\NQ JAN 0 1.. PREVIO PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE PREVIOUS RANGE BASE FEE VALUATION 67,777.78 31 78,499.00 14,460,739.44 1,064.21 0 0.00 0.00 43,861.32 352 85,748.50 7,586,699.10 3,574.04 39 9,029.00 858.590.00 0.00 15 780.00 0.00 2,014.84 1 6,365.25 1,492,000.00 883.35 6 3,051.25 367,555.00 154.21 5 1,462.25 110,000.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 4 977.00 124,980.00 0.00 6 180.00 0.00 3,406.81 25 5,523.25 375,003.20 122,736.56*485*191,665.50*25,375,566.74* 0.00 103 13,729.72 1,077,882.44 0.00 22 1,069.85 74,205.52 0.00 2 70.00 3,000.00 0.00 72 3,015.19 165,918.00 0.00 8 280.00 10,135.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 280.00 7,984.00 0.00 19 681.25 26,183.00 0.00 12 516.25 .il,063.75 0.00*246*19,642.26*1,386,371.71* 0.00 160 13,599.00 943,395.38 0.00 1 82.75 6,620.00 0.00 9 1,635.00 1,225.00 0.00 10 350.00 2,600.00 0.00 1 35.00 600.00 0.00*101*15,701.75*954,440.38* 0.00 49 1,715.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 37 3,650.00 0.00 0.00 3 150.00 0.00 0.00 46 44,250.00 0.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0.00 3 105.00 750.00 0.00 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 2 35.00 0.00 0.00*144*50,095.00*750.00* 0.00 1 137.25 7,800.00 PLAN REVIEW 51,024 0 36,843 5,520 0 4,137 1,765 105 0 0 0 3,424 102,820 .29 .00 .33 .32 .00 .41 .07 .46 .00 .00 .00 .55 .43* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ''.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 1 YEAR-TO-DATE REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OP RUN 12/01/99 ***** PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO *****PAGE: 2 REQUESTER: CAROLE -- CURRENT RANGE - 01/01/99 - 11/30/99 PERMIT TYPE PER./FREE STANDG TEMPORARY Sub-total QTY 1 5 7* BASE FEE 21.00 140.00 209.50* VALUATION 450.00 0.00 1,950.00* Fire FIRE SPRINKLER FIRE SPRINKLER Sub-total 2 3 5* 422.50 1.698.88 2,121.38* 33,800.00 135,550.00 169,350.00* User Defined LAND ALTERATION RETAINING WALLS nOPKQ LAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total 20 1,030.00 0.00 2 491.75 33,920.00 1 30.00 0.00 22 770.00 0.00 45*2.321.75*33.920.00* Grand-total 1,043**295,158.41** 30,685,136.37** PLAN REVIEW QTY 01/01/98 - 11/30/98 BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 0.00 1 74.75 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 0.00 0.00 0.00*4*282.00*10,300.00*0.00* 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 3,650.00 292,000.00 0.00 0.00*1*3,650.00*292,000.00*0.00* 0.00 34 1,800.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 1 87.25 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32 1,120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00*67*3,007.25*4,500.00*0.00* 122,736.56**1,128**284,043.76**28,023,928.83**102,820.43** un YEAR-TO-DATE REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 12/01/99 *«*** PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/99 TO 11/30/99 ***••PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH PEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN MAIL IN MAIL IN PEE MAIL-IN PEE HATER CONNECTION ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL BUILDING 220.283.00 122,736.56 13,788.78 0.00 17,850.00 5,167.50 0.00 2,450.00 0.00 382,275.84 MECHANICAL 24,000.99 0.00 864.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 149.61 1.50 28.99 62.19 0.00 25,107.51 PLUMBING 21,551.79 0.00 546.51 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 58.48 9.00 18.00 0.00 22,218.78 SEWER & WATER 24,670.00 0.00 36.50 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 24,806.50 USER SIGN FIRE 2,321.75 209.50 2,121.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.00 0.75 84.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 1.50 4.50 1.50 3.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,457.75 211.75 2,212.26 REPORT NBR. BPEBRPT2-1 DATE OP RUN 12/01/99 BASE PEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH PEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT MAIL IN MAIL IN MAIL IN PEE MAIL-IN PEE WATER CONNECTION ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL REPORT TOTAL 295,158.41 122,736.56 15,348.65 0.00 17,850.00 5,402.50 0.00 218.59 1.50 39.49 84.69 2,450.00 0.00 459,290.39 ***** permit fee report ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/99 TO 11/30/99 PAGE; 2 REQUESTER: CaROLE M. .. ■ YEAR-TO-DATE REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 12/01/99 i^TO D C’M'P .**.* PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ . ***** PERMIT TYPE QTY 01/01/99 - BASE FEE 11/30/99 VALUATION ^•LAN REVIEW QTY User Defined SUBDIVISION 19 17,920.00 0.00 0.00 16 VARIANCE 45 11,200.00 0.00 0.00 62 CUP 12 2,250.00 0.00 0.00 16 SKETCH PLAN 10 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 4 VARIANCE/CUP 6 1,850.00 0.00 0.00 7 VACATION 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 REZONING 1 350.00 0.00 0.00 1 RQST SIMILAR USE 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 ZONING CODE AMEN 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Sub-total 98*36,070.00*0.00*0.00*109* Grand-total 98**36,070.00**0.00**0.00**109** PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 01/01/98 - 11/30/98 BASE FEE 7,037 15,510 3,000 1,150 1,900 300 350 250 0 29,497 .50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .50* 29,497.50** VALUATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00** PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00** REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 12/01/99 ** PERMIT FEE REPORT CITY OF ORONO FROM 01/01/99 TO 11/30/99 * * * ♦*PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE USER REPORT TOTAL BASE FEE 36,070.00 36,070.00 PLAN REVIEW O.OC 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 0.00 SAC 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 36,070.00 36,070.00 1999 RECAP OF CONTRACT CITIES January February March April June July August September October Noveitiber December YTD Totals 839.0S414.14467.96 Spring Park Plan Review 40.46 274.14 0.00 2,760.22 2,063.10 1,376.90 3,095.31 1,389.54 398.00 2,317.90 89.21 11,797.67 Inspections 120.00 45.00 195.00 135.00 135.00 180.00 150.00 360.00 210.00 360.00 375.00 1,900.00 Retainer 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 23.00 25.00 23.00 23.00 23.00 275.00 TOTAL 183*46 344.14 220.00 2,920.22 2,223.10 1,781.90 3,270.31 1,774.54 833.00 2,702.90 489.21 16,744.78 No. Plan Reviews 1 1 0 4 4 4 5 3 2 2 2 28 No. Inspections 8 3 13 9 9 12 10 24 14 24 23 151 Minnetonka Beach Plan Review 568.59 0.00 72.96 326.79 787.80 739.21 4,565.86 1,636.86 5,677.42 444.92 2,424.67 17,243.08 Inspections 60.00 45.00 150.00 135.00 60.00 180.00 300.00 435.00 270.00 165.00 300.00 2,100.00 Retainer 23.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 23.00 25.00 23.00 25.00 25.00 275.00 TOTAL 633.39 70.00 247.96 486.79 872.80 944.21 4,890.86 2,096.86 5,972.42 634.92 2,749.67 19,620.08 No. Plan Reviews 1 0 1 1 2 1 7 3 4 2 3 25 No. Inspections 4 3 10 9 4 12 20 29 18 11 20 140 REPORT NBR. SATE OF RUN BPRMTISS-1 12/01/99 PERMIT TYPE Building SGL FAMILY-NEW cF-AOD/REMODBL 3F-ACC STRUCTURE DEMO/PRINCIPAL COM-AOD/REMODEL COM-ACC STRUCTUR ACC/GARAGES Sub-total Mechanical HEATING SYSTEMS AIR CONDITIONING FIREPLACE VENTILATION GAS LINE INSPECT DUCT WORK ONLY REMOVE OIL TANK Sub-total Plumbing FIXTURES WATER METER UNDEFINED Sub-total Sewer & Water SEWER CONNECTION NEW SEPTIC SYSTE DRNFLD 6/OR TANK SAC ONLY SEWER REPAIR SEWER 6 WATER UNDEFINED Sub-total User Defined LAND ALTERATION RETAINING WALLS lAWN SPRINKLER Sub-total Grand-total QTY 4413 •46 3*^ 3 2 2 1 4 59* 24 0 13 1 6 1 0 45* 18 2 2 22* 6 2 1 3 0 1 0 13* 3 1 3 7* 146** NOVEMBER 1999 *****PERMIT ISSUED REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO -- CURRENT RANGE - 11/01/99 - 11/30/99 BASE FEE 26,861.00 9.490.90 349.75 160.00 112.50 237.25 2,195.50 39,406.90* 1,581.31 0.00 606.93 35.00 210.00 35.00 0.00 2.468.24* 1,515.26 480.00 70.00 2,065.26* 210.00 200.00 50.00 3,150.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 3,680.00* 150.00 50.00 105.00 305.00* 4 .. , VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 5, n*i5, Seo. Co■OiOuVaoft.oa 17,241.76 4,231.07 16,600.00 0.00 3,800.00 13,900.00 195,000.00 4,750,520.61* 117,267.00 0.00 38,354.00 900.00 3.250.00 1.500.00 0.00 161,271.00* 105,049.53 33,260.00 1,519.00 639,818->*a* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00* 0.00 3,920.00 0.00 3,920.00* 47,925.40** »f045 ^ OZX.^90 . 227.33 0.00 73.12 154.21 1,427.07 23,354.56^ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00^ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 23,354.56** couNrii Mi^ETiNa JAN 0 1 2000 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE 11/01/98 -11/30/98 QTY BASE FEE VALUATION 1 2,012.25 325,000.00 27 5,631.75 397,730.40 2 95.75 2,700.00 1 50.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 524.50 35,944.00 33*8,314.25*761,374.40* 13 884.32 68,047.00 1 38.75 3,100.00 3 105.00 3,825.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2 70.00 1,500.00 1 35.00 1,850.00 20*1,133.07*78,322.00* 12 827.44 57,445.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 12*827.44*57,445.00* 8 280.00 0.00 5 500.00 0.00 1 50.00 0.00 2 1,000.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 18*1,900.00*0.00* 2 100.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 35.00 0.00 3*135.00*0.00* 86**12,309.76**897,141.40* PLAN REVIEW 1,307.96 2,637.86 62.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 340.93 4,348.99* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00* 4,348.99** i NOVEMBER 1999 REPORT NBR. BFBBRPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 12/01/99 CITY OF ORONO FROM 11/01/99 TO 11/30/99 PAGE: 41 REQUESTER: CAROLE BUILDING MECHANICAL PLUMBING SEWER & WATER USER SIGN FIRE BASE FEE 39,406.90 2,468.24 2,065.26 3,600.00 305.00 0.00 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 23,354.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 2,376.47 82.47 54.74 5.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 Lie. SEARCH FEB 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 SAC 10,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INVESTIGATION 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 C.SO 0.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAIL-IN FEE MAIL IN MAIL IN FEE WATER CONNECTION 2,450.00 28.24 4 .49 4.50 3.00 4.50 1.50 ESCROW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 78,007.93 2,587.94 2,164.00 3,685.00 307.50 0.00 0.00 REPORT NBR. BFEBRPTl-1 DATE OF RUN 12/01/99 ***** PERMIT FEE CITY OF FROM 11/01/99 REPORT ♦***♦ ORONO TO 11/30/99 PAGE: 42 REQUESTER: CAROLE REPORT TOTAL BASE FEB 47,925.40 PLAN REVIEW 23,354.56 SURCHARGE 2,521.18 Lie. SEARCH FEE 0.00 SAC 10,500.00 INVESTIGATION 35.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 MAIL-IN FEB MAIL IN MAIL IN FEB WATER CONNECTION 31.24 8.99 6.00 2,450.00 (^1' »-*v ‘ ^ ESCROW • «0.00 PERMIT TOTAL 86,832.37 r ' • •4 WED, DEC 1, 1999, 7:56 AM PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET PAGE 1 NOVEMBER 1999 ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 03 04 04 2108 2683 550 3700 3701 3703 3705 3706 3702 3704 2865 3675 145 1380 560 2825 2100 1820 122 SUGARWOOD DR CASCO POINT RD OXFORD RD LIVINGSTON AVE LIVINGSTON AVE LIVINGSTON AVE LIVINGSTON AVE LIVINGSTON AVE LIVINGSTON AVE LIVINGSTON AVE LITTLE ORCHARD WAY JACOBS MILL RD BROWN RD S FRENCH CREEK DR NORTH ARM DR CASCO POINT RD WEBBER KILLS RD FOX ST CHEVY CHASE DR 04 3590 NORTH SHORE DR 05 2601 CASCO POINT RD 06 1354 REST PT CIR 10 2580 DUNWOODY AVE 10 2735 CAROLINE AVE 10 2735 CAROLINE AVE 10 3556 LIVINGSTON AVE 11 2227 SHADYWOOD RD 11 95 WILLOW DR N 11 4005 NORTH SHORE DR 11 3436 LIVINGSTON AVE 11 1280 NORTH ARM DR 11 115 CHEVY CHASE DR 11 1150 HERITAGE LA 11 730 GANDER RD 11 3300 FOX ST 11 1387 ORONO LA 11 3135 CASCO CIR 11 4045 WATERTOWN RD 11 1160 WILLOW DR N 11 645 NORTH ARM DR 15 950 NORTH ARM DR 16 WATERTOWN RD 16 145 BROWN RD S 19 2160 WAYZATA BLVD 19 865 FERNDALE RD N 29 3609 SHORELINE DR 29 520 TONKAWA RD 29 2700 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 29 3035 CASCO POINT RD 29 1410 CHERRY PL 29 540 BARRETT AVE 29 1700 SHADYWOOD RD 29 1555 ORONO OAKS DR 29 2645 CASCO POINT RD 99/11/04 OR- 99/11/12 OR- 99/11/17 OR- 99/11/30 OR- 99/11/30 OR- 99/11/30 OR- 99/11/30 OR- 99/11/30 OR- 99/11/30 OR- 99/11/30 OR- 99/11/29 OR- 99/11/29 OR- 99/11/30 OR- 99/11/02 OR- 99/11/23 OR- 99/11/30 OR- 99/11/09 OR- 99/11/16 OR- 99/11/17 OR- 99/11/29 OR- 99/11/30 OR- 99/11/10 OR- 99/11/24 OR- 99/11/29 OR- 99/11/29 OR- 99/11/29 OR- 99/11/02 OR- 99/11/02 OR- 99/11/02 OR- 99/11/02 OR- 99/11/08 OR- 99/11/12 OR- 99/11/12 OR- 99/11/12 OR- 99/11/15 OR- 99/11/17 OR- 99/11/18 OR- 99/11/18 OR 99/11/18 OR 99/11/22 OR 99/11/02 OR 99/11/29 OR 99/11/30 OR 99/11/03 OR 99/11/16 OR 99/11/12 OR 99/11/10 OR 99/11/09 OR 99/11/05 OR 99/11/01 OR 99/11/08 OR 99/11/04 OR 99/11/24 OR 99/11/12 OR 012091 012104 012117 012169 012172 012173 012174 012175 012176 012177 012178 012199 012219 011983 012171 012187 012101 012145 012147 012201 012215 011418 -012193 -012202 -012203 -012204 -011847 -012077 -012083 -012085 -012106 -012120 -012122 -012132 -012135 -012149 -012154 -012156 -012157 -012168 -011422 -012196 -012220 -011749 -011778 -010813 -011947 -011986 -012055 -012071 -012094 -012096 -012100 -012129 13281421 18948904 14735435 15532726 15532726 15532726 15532726 15532726 15532726 15532726 19390808 00000000 14752097 14722724 00000000 14752097 18859808 19289262 14766768 00000000 14710532 00000000 00000000 18943600 18943600 18943600 17216628 15935325 15665225 00000000 14726539 12862092 19206592 18266460 18238046 00000000 00000000 00000000 ooouoooo 14311200 00000000 00000000 14752097 17806332 14483130 00000000 19240043 14791890 14710532 15375995 17291944 00000000 15858965 00000000 RVC HOMES MAURER GEORGE C CONSTR INC STEINER &KOPPELMAN, INC EAGLE CREST NORTH WEST EAGLE CREST NORTH WEST EAGLE CREST NORTH WEST EAGLE CREST NORTH WEST EAGLE CREST NORTH WEST EAGLE CREST NORTH WEST EAGLE CREST NORTH WEST PARAGON DESIGNER & BLDRS BOYER St SONS INC ANDERSON-LINDQU1ST BOYER St SONS INC CORRECTIVE BLDG SVCS INC AULIK & LULOFF STICKNEY AND SCHWARZ DANBERRY COMPANY K DESIGNERS K DESIGNERS K DESIGNERS PANELCRAFT OF MINNESOTA ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC NEW HAVEN CONSTRUCTION SMITH WF ROOFING MIKE REMER CONSTRUCTION HOME UPDATE CO TOWN & COUNTRY REMODELING SELA ROOFING JOHNSON REILAND CONSTR INC BOYER St SONS INC GRIFFIN PETROLEUM BERG DRYWALL CHOICE WOOD COMPANY STRUCTURES UNLIMITED INC DANBERRY COMPANY T.R. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION GARDNER St ASSOCIATES ALPINE DESIGNERSS.BUILDERS OWNER LAST iJM VALUATION -------------- - - 445,000.00 ERICKSON 550,000.00 KNUTSON 635,800.00 110,000.00 110,000.00 110,000.00 110,000.00 110,000.00 110,000.00 110,000.00 750,000.00 AMENT 250,000.00 WINTON 395,000.00 KOPP 90,000.00 MAZER 48,000.00 YORKS 20,000.00 JILLSON 15,000.00 MACMILLAN 130,000.00 CARLSON 25,000.00 FEGERS 25,000.00 HEDBLOM 40,000.00 SCHEBLER 1,920.00 NAFUS 8,000.00 HEBIG 17,878.00 HEBIG 17,878.00 LONG 8,286.61 SPAULDING 22,713.00 FAIRBANKS 5,520.00 WOOD 3,200.00 BEISCH 1,100.00 HUNTSMAN 4,975.00 SCHUETTE 4,950.00 NICKLOW 17,300.00 ANDERSON 8,200.00 TRUBECK 3,750.00 MOEN 2,500.00 AMUNDSON 8,000.00 KELLENBERGER 2,000.00 HILLSTROM 3,500.00 SHIN 20,500.00 OLSON 800.00 KRAEMAR .00 WINTON . 00 WEAR 13,900.00 3,000.00 WAGNER 800.00 CARLSON/NELSON 123,000.00 BENNETT 21,768.00 BERTHIAUME 7,500.00 WILBUR 3,000.00 JAFFRAY 20,000.00 PATTERSON 7,500.00 HAUSER 20,000.00 GREENE 4,000.00 WED, DEC 1, 1999, 7:56 AM PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF PAGE 2 WORK ADDR NBR STREET 29 2650 COUNTRYSIDE DR 29 3740 TOGO RD 29 255 LANDMARK DR 29 1780 SHADYWOOD RD 30 4705 WATERTOWN RD 33 2780 .DEER RUN TR E 60C • 1 01 2102 SUGARWOOD DR 01 1575 LONG LAKE BLVD 01 1685 FOX ST 01 4461 BAYSIDE RD 01 3393 CRYSTAL BAY RD 01 2180 ABINGDON WAY 01 2155 SHEVLIN DR 01 3260 BOHNS PT LA 01 3070 NORTH SHORE DR 01 2700 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 2850 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 01 300 6TH AVE N 01 265 HOLLANDER RD 01 1130 LOMA LINDA AVE 01 2104 SUGARWOOD DR 01 2700 CASCO POINT RD 01 185 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 01 450 ORONO ORCHARD RD 01 1405 PARK DR 01 2248 SHADYWOOD RD 01 3095 CASCO POINT RD 01 2755 DEER RUN TR E 01 185 BEDERWOOD DR 01 2850 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 01 2104 SUGARWOOD DR 01 2108 SUGARWOOD DR 02 3070 NORTH SHORE DR 02 366 NORTH ARM LA 02 1216 NORTH ARM DR 02 1815 EAGERNESS POINT RD 02 2650 COUNTRYSIDE DR 02 1685 FOX ST 24 1295 BRIAR ST 24 3551 LVRIC AVE 24 490 OLD LONG LAKE RD 24 1972 SHADYWOOD RD 24 4330 NORTH SHORE DR 24 465 LINDEN AVE 24 1369 NORTH ARM DR 24 3465 CRYSTAL PL 24 1160 TONKAWA RD 24 2285 FRENCH LAKE RD 24 2655 SHADYWOOD RD 29 3315 CRYSTAL BAY RD 29 45C 2056 SHORELINE DR NOVEMBER 1999 ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VA.,UATION 60C MB 99/11/17 99/11/22 99/11/30 99/11/30 99/11/01 99/11/22 OR-012151 OR-012166 OR-012212 OR-012217 OR-012075 CR-012170 99/11/02 OR- 99/11/01 OR- 99/11/02 OR- 99/11/03 OR- 99/11/09 OR- 99/11/09 OR- 99/11/10 OR- 99/11/12 OR- 99/11/12 OR- 99/11/12 OR- 99/11/12 OR- 99/11/15 OR- 99/11/15 OR- 99/11/15 OR- 99/11/16 99/11/16 99/11/18 99/11/19 99/11/19 99/11/19 99/11/24 99/11/24 99/11/24 99/11/24 99/11/24 99/11/24 99/11/02 99/11/03 OR 99/11/04 OR 99/11/12 OR 99/11/17 OR 99/11/30 OR 99/11/02 OR 99/11/02 OR 99/11/02 OR 99/11/02 OR 99/11/01 OR 99/11/19 99/11/24 99/11/24 OR 99/11/24 OR 99/11/24 99/11/29 99/11/01 OR 99/11/09 OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR OR 012072 012073 012082 012086 012113 012115 012119 012126 012127 012128 •012131 •012134 •012136 •012138 -012142 -012143 -012155 -012159 -012161 -012162 -012186 ■012188 -012189 -012191 -012194 -012195 -012084 -012088 -012095 -012133 -012153 -012210 -012043 -012078 -012079 -012080 -012081 -012160 -012181 -012182 -012183 -012190 -012198 -012076 -012114 00000000 JCr.GENSON 45,000.00 00000000 GLASSCO 12,360.00 14042984 METRO HANDYMAN CASEY 4,000.00 00000000 PATTERSON 115,000.00 00000000 STALOCH 9,600.00 14746776 ALAN NIKOLAI CONSTRUCTION STICKNEY 6,200.00 36332561 FIRESIDE CORNER 4,400.00 34735808 ABSOLUTE HEATING & COOLING CLARK 4,500.00 35453797 FIREPLACE CENTER HANSER 1,200.00 34618006 THE BRICKSMITH INC UBAN 8,400.00 34791600 COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C HAMMER 5,879.00 34871061 DOODY MECHANICAL INC DEVRIES 1,100.00 36332561 FIRESIDE CORNER PAULSON 3,800.00 29337717 THOMPSON PLBG RITTER 250.00 35531445 GUYERS BUILDERS EXPRESS HASNAIN 1,000.00 35531445 GUYERS BUILDERS EXPRESS BENNETT 2,000.00 24701208 STEINKRAUS PLBG INC CARPENTER 300.00 22244771 RYAN PLUMBING & HEATING DAYTON 400.00 35453797 FIREPLACE CENTER DOEPKE 1,000.00 35360667 MARSH HEATING & AIR COND BOCKMANN 8,900.00 35453797 FIREPLACE CENTER 1,000.00 34282826 PRACTICAL SYSTEMS BUESING 1,000.00 34283677 HEATING & COOLING TWO 7,500.00 39296767 VOGT FRED & CO G 4,500.00 37542199 RIVER CITY SHEET METAL SHEARER 2,000.00 37542199 RIVER CITY SHEET METAL NORDLIE 2,000.00 34282826 PRACTICAL SYSTEMS HOFFMAN 200.00 34789558 DITTER INC 19,265.00 34791600 COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C WILLIAMS 2,200.00 39296767 VOGT FRED & CO 900.00 38560500 CITY WIDE MECHANICAL 8,500.00 38560500 CITY WIDE MECHANICAL 10,000.00 34283677 HEATING & COOLING TWO 5,800.00 34791600 COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C LARSON 3,675.00 00000000 DURKIN 2,800.00 34477185 STATEWIDE GAS SERVICES INC MCKEE 2,u00.00 00000000 JORGENSON 3,000.00 34748366 ABEL/B & C INC CASHMAN 7,000.00 34732267 SABRE HEATING & AIR CONDIT JENTILUCCI 2,075.00 38242656 STANDARD HTG & AC CO BINGTON 1,895.00 34789558 DITTER INC WIKEN 1,949.00 38819000 SEDGWICK HTG & AC CO 5,615.00 38819000 SEDGWICK HTG & AC CO LOPEZ 6,925.00 34748366 ABEL/B & C INC HOMMEYER 2,115.00 37241899 RESIDENTIAL HTG & AIR INC WHARRAM 1,978.00 34458585 RON'S MECH INC KRUEGER 3,000.00 34748366 ABEL/B & C INC STEVENS 2,150.00 34791600 COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C LANDIS 4,000.00 33230108 RAMSEY HEATING & COOLING HADEN 1,300.00 34282826 PRACTICAL SYSTEMS KEENAN 300.00 39411044 CENTRAIRE INC TERRY 1,500.00 45C WED, DECT 1, -.999, 7:56 AM PAGE 3 PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE MONTH OF PERMIT WORK ADDR NBR STREET NOVEMBER 1999 ISSUED PERMIT NBR ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION 22C SW 13C UD 7C 147C 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 03 24 24 24 24 22C 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 24 13C 01 01 01 01 22 22 32 7C 1981 1130 2102 120 2700 3260 3260 2850 2104 455 1580 205 450 185 1380 2650 2745 1685 680 1070 2515 3465 1465 120 120 180 115 3260 125 2108 125 140 3675 550 1209 345 1155 1972 1655 3175 3020 4520 EAGERNESS POINT RD LOMA LINDA AVE SUGARWOOD DR ORONO ORCHARD RD S COUNTRYSIDE DR W BOHNS PT LA BOHNS PT LA LITTLE ORCHARD WAY SUGARWOOD DR TONKAWA RD BOHNS PT RD NORTHGATE RD ORONO ORCHARD RD S CRYSTAL CREEK RD FRENCH CREEK DR COUNTRYSIDE DR ETHEL AVE FOX ST TONKAWA RD TONKAWA RD KELLY AVE CRYSTAL PL FOX ST ORONO ORCHARD RD ORONO ORCHARD RD ORONO ORCHARD RD SMITH AVE BOHNS PT LA SMITH AVE SUGARWOOD DR SMITH AVE SMITH AVE JACOBS MILL RD OXFORD RD FRENCH CREEK DR NORTH ARM LA HERITAGE LA SHADYWOOD RD BOHNS PT RD JAMESTOWN RD WATERTOWN RD WEST BRANCH RD S S S 99/11/09 OR- 99/11/08 OR- 99/11/08 OR- 99/11/09 OR- 99/11/10 OR- 99/11/12 OR- 99/11/12 OR- 99/11/12 OR- 99/11/16 OR- 99/11/16 OR- 99/11/24 OR- 99/11/29 OR- 99/11/29 OR- 99/11/30 OR- 99/11/17 OR 99/11/17 OR 99/11/19 OR 99/11/08 OR 99/11/19 OR 99/11/24 OR 99/11/24 OR 99/11/30 OR 99/11/03 OR 99/11/05 OR 99/11/08 OR 99/11/08 OR 99/11/08 OR 99/11/12 OR 99/11/15 OR 99/11/19 OR 99/11/22 OR 99/11/29 OR 99/11/29 OR 99/11/30 OR 99/11/30 OR 012093 012108 012109 012116 012118 012123 012124 012130 012140 012141 012192 012200 012208 012216 012150 012152 012158 012110 012163 012179 012180 012211 012089 012103 012105 012107 012112 012125 012139 012164 012167 012197 012209 012218 012214 99/11/03 99/11/04 99/11/08 99/11/15 99/11/04 99/11/08 OR-012087 OR-012092 OR-012111 OR-012137 OR-012097 OR-012098 99/11/29 OR-012206 29337200 54734300 25334357 24738403 24724959 29337717 29337717 24701208 29387500 29337200 29331780 13311337 29296767 27844792 34733680 00000000 34701208 25509666 00000000 27800555 27800555 28274033 54734300 00000000 24461495 54734300 00000000 29337717 00000000 24722316 54734300 29334793 00000000 24724959 54734300 00000000 84347004 00000000 69411138 00000000 14735435 17876635 CULLIGAN SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE PLYMOUTH PLUMBING DAY EARL W & SONS WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS THOMPSON PLBG THOMPSON PLBG STEINKRAUS PLBG INC LEE PLUMBING CULLIGAN SYMINGTON PLBG DEMPSEY TERRENCE NEU PLUMBING HOKANSON PLUMBING INC STEVE SCHMIT PLUMBING STEINKRAUS PLBG & HTG AWD COOLERS OF MINNESOTA COMMERS CONDITIONED WATER COMMERS CONDITIONED WATER NORBLOM PLUMBING CO SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE WIDMER INC SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE THOMPSON PLBG COPPIN PLBG SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE ROYAL PLUMBING AND HEATING WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE SUN SHOWER AQUA ENGINEERING, INC. STEINER &KOPPELMAN, INC TEKNISCAPES CHRISTIANSEN 500.00 BOCKMANN 800.00 .00 MERCHANT 719.00 BENNETT 1,995.00 RITTER 23,250.00 RITTER CARPENTER 4,000.00 17,000.00 NASIR 209.53 ROVIK 15,500.00 UNKNOWN 3,000.00 GARNETT 1,550.00 12,950.00 KOPP 4,600.00 JORGENSON 4,000.00 JENSEN 2,200.00 HANSER 9,000.00 DEVEAU 500.00 PITRILLO 2,400.00 HARDTEN 1,995.00 KROEGER 400.00 BIRKELAND .00 MERCHANT .00 MERCHANT .00 ROKKE .00 HERTZENBERG .00 RITTER .00 HORNER .00 .00 HORNER .00 HUNT .00 AMENT .00 .00 LUX .00 SIPPRELL .00 VILTOFT .00 HOLMLUND .00 NEWMAN .00 AWES .00 RENCKENS .00 EASTMAN 3,920.00 5,063,408.14* WED, DEC 1, *:»99, 7:54 AM NUMERICAL LISTING PAGE 1 NOVEMBER 1999 PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NBR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OWNER LAST NM VALUATION OR-010813 OR-011418 OR-011422 OR-011749 OR-011778 OR-011847 OR-011947 OR-OH983 OR-011986 OR-012043 OR-012055 OR-012071 OR-012071 OR-012073 OR-012075 OR-012076 OR-012077 OR-012078 OR-012079 OR-012080 OR-012081 OR-012082 OR-012083 OR-012084 OR-012085 OR-012086 OR-012087 OR-012088 OR-012089 OR-012091 OR-012092 OR-012093 OR-012094 OR-012095 OR-012096 OR-OJ2G97 OR-012098 OK-012100 OR-012101 OR-012103 OR-012104 OR-012105 OR-012106 OR-012107 OR-012108 OR-012109 OR-012110 OR-012111 OR-012112 OR-012113 OR-012114 OR-012115 OR-.01211<; OR-012117' 99/11/12 99/11/10 99/11/02 99/11/03 99/11/16 99/11/02 99/11/10 99/11/02 99/11/09 99/11/02 99/11/05 99/11/01 99/11/02 99/11/01 99/11/01 99/11/01 99/11/02 99/11/02 99/11/02 99/11/02 99/11/01 99/11/02 99/11/02 99/11/02 99/11/02 99/11/03 99/11/03 99/11/03 99/11/03 99/11/04 99/11/04 99/11/09 99/11/08 99/11/04 99/11/04 99/11/04 99/11/08 99/11/24 99/11/09 99/11/05 99/11/12 99/11/08 99/11/08 99/11/08 99/11/ort 99/ll/.»* U 99/11A'8 99/11 •'< 99/11/08 99/11/09 99/11/09 99/11/09 99/11/09 99/11/17 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V a N N N N N N 3609 1354 950 2160 865 2227 520 1380 2700 1295 3035 1410 2102 1575 4705 3315 95 3551 490 1972 4330 1685 4005 3070 3436 4461 345 366 1465 2108 1155 1981 540 1216 1780 3175 3020 1555 2100 120 2683 120 1280 180 1130 2102 1685 1972 115 3393 2056 2100 120 550 SHORELINE DR REST PT CIR NORTH ARM DR WAYZATA BLVD FERNDALB RD N SHADYWOOD RD TONKAWA RD FRENCH CREEK DR COUNTRYSIDE DR W BRIAR ST CASCO POINT RD CHERRY PL SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE BLVD WATERTOWN RD CRYSTAL BAY RD WILLOW DR N LYRIC AVE OLD LONG LAKE RD SHADYWOOD RD NORTH SHORE DR FOX ST NORTH SHORE DR NORTH SHORE DR LIVINGSTON AVE BAYSIDE RD NORTH ARM LA NORTH ARM LA FOX ST SUGARWOOD DR HERITAGE LA EAGERNESS POINT I BARRETT AVE NORTH ARM DR SHADYWOOD RD JAMESTOWN RD WATERTOWN RD ORONO OAKS DR WEBBER HILLS RP ORONO ORCHARD /U CASCO POINT RD ORONO ORCHARD RD NORTH ARM DR ORONO ORCHARD RD LOMA LINDA AVE SUGARWOOD DR FOX ST SHADYWOOD RD SMITH AVE CRYSTAL DAY RD SHORELINE DR ABINGDON WAY ORONO ORCHARD RD OXFORD RD S 29 06 15 19 19 11 29 02 29 24 29 29 01 01 30 29 11 24 24 24 24 01 11 02 11 01 01 02 01 01 01 01 29 02 29 22 22 29 03 01 01 01 11 01 01 01 03 01 01 01 29 01 01 01 • ^ • 00000000 00000000 00000000 17806332 14483130 17216628 19240043 14722724 14791890 34732267 14710532 15375995 36332561 34735808 00000000 34282826 15935325 38242656 34789558 38819000 38819000 35453797 15665225 34283677 00000000 34618006 00000000 34791600 54734300 13281421 84347004 29337200 17291944 00000000 00000000 00000000 14735435 15858965 18859808 00000000 18948904 24461495 14726539 54734300 54734300 25334357 25*^09666 00000000 00000000 34791600 39411044 34871061 24738403 14735435 GRIFFx'N PETROLEUM BERG DRYWALL PANELCRAFT OF MINNESOTA CHOICE WOOD COMPANY ANDERSON-LINDQUIST STRUCTURES UNLIMITED INC SABRE HEATING & AIR CONDIT DANBERRY COMPANY T.R. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION FIRESIDE CORNER ABSOLUTE HEATING & COOLING PRACTICAL SYSTEMS ALLSTAR CONSTRUCTION INC STANDARD HTG & AC CO DITTER INC SEDGWICK HTG & AC SEDGWICK HTG & AC FIREPLACE CENTER NEW HAVEN CONSTRUCTION HEATING & COOLING TWO CO CO THE BRICKSMITH INC COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE RVC HOMES SUN SHOWER CULLIGAN GARDNER & ASSOCIATES STEINER ficKOPPELMAN, INC ALPINE DESIGNERS&BUILDERS CORRECTIVE BLDG SVCS INC »'VJRER GEORGE C CONSTR INC WiCMER INC SMITH WF ROOFING SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE SULS t ' S UTILITY SERVICE PLYMOUTH PLUMBING AWD COOLERS OF MINNESOTA COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C CENTRAIRE INC DOODY MECHANICAL INC DAY EARL W & SONS STEINER &KOPPELMAN, INC WAGNER SCHEBLER 1,920.00 OLSON 800.00 WEAR 13,900.00 3,000.00 SPAULDING 22,713.00 CARLSON/NELSON 123,000.00 KOPP 90,000.00 BENNETT 21,768.00 JENTILUCCI 2,075.00 BERTHIAUME 7,500.00 WILBUR 3,000.00 4,400.00 CLARK 4,500.00 STALOCH 9,600.00 KEENAN 300.00 FAIRBANKS 5,520.00 BINGTON 1,895.00 WIKEN 1.949.00 5.615.00 LOPEZ 6,925.00 HANSER 1,200.00 WOOD 3.200.00 5.800.00 BEISCH 1,100.00 UBAN 8,400.00 SIPPRELL .00 LARSON 3,675.00 BIRKELAND .00 RICKS 445,000.00 VILTOFT .00 CHRISTIANSEN 500.00 JAFFRAY 20,000.00 DURKIN 2,800.00 PATTERSON 7,500.00 AWES .00 RENCKENS .00 HAUSER 20,000.00 JILLSON 15,000.00 MERCHANT .00 ERICKSON 550,000.00 MERCHANT .00 HUNTSMAN 4,975.00 ROKKE .00 BOCKMANN 800.00 .00 HANSER 9,000.00 HOLMLUND .00 HERTZENBERG .00 HAMMER 5,879.00 TERRY 1,500.00 DEVRIES 1,100.00 MERCHANT 719.00 KNUTSON 635,800.00 WED, DEC 1, 1999, 7:54 AM NUMERICAL LISTING NOVEMBER 1999 PERMIT NBR ISSUED CANCEL ADDR NDR STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPLY PAGE 2 OWNER LAST NM VALUATION OR-012118 OR-012119 OR-012120 OR-012122 OR-012123 OR-012124 OR-012125 OR-012126 OR-012127 OR-012128 OR-012129 OR-012130 OR-012131 OR-012132 OR-012133 OR-012134 OR-012135 OR-012136 OR-012137 OR-012138 OR-012139 OR-012140 OR-012141 OR-012142 OR-012143 OR-012145 OR-012147 OR-012149 OR-012150 OR-012151 OR-012152 OR-012153 OR-012154 OR-012155 OR-012156 OR-012157 OR-012158 OR-012159 OR-012160 OR-012161 OR-012162 OR-012163 OR-012164 OR-012166 OR-012167 OR-012168 OR-012169 OR-012170 OR-012171 OR-012172 OR-012173 OR-012174 OR-012175 OR-012176 99/11/10 N 99/11/10 N 99/11/1? N 99/11/12 N 99/11/12 N 99/11/12 N 99/11/12 N 99/11/12 N 99/11/12 N 99/11/12 N 99/11/12 N 99/11/12 N 99/11/12 N 99/11/12 N 99/11/12 N 99/11/15 N 99/11/15 N 99/11/15 N 99/11/15 N 99/11/15 N 99/11/15 N 99/11/16 N 99/11/16 N 99/11/16 N 99/11/16 N 99/11/16 N 99/11/17 N 99/11/17 N 99/11/17 N 99/11/17 N 99/11/17 N 99/11/17 N 99/11/18 N 99/11/18 N 99/11/18 N 99/11/18 N 99/11/19 N 99/11/19 N 99/11/19 N 99/11/19 N 99/11/19 N 99/11/19 N 99/11/19 N 99/11/22 N 99/11/22 N 99/11/22 N 99/11/30 N 99/11/22 N 99/11/23 N 99/11/30 N 99/11/30 N 99/11/30 N 99/11/30 N ' ll/lO N 2700 2155 115 1150 3260 3260 3260 3260 3070 2700 2645 2850 2850 730 1815 300 3300 265 1655 1130 125 2104 455 2104 2700 1820 122 1387 1380 2650 2650 2650 3135 185 4045 1160 2745 450 465 1405 2248 680 2108 3740 125 645 3700 2780 560 3701 3703 3705 3706 3702 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 SHEVLIN DR 01 CHEVY CHASE DR 11 HERITAGE LA H BOHNS PT LA 01 BOHNS PT LA 01 BOHNS PT LA 01 BOHNS PT LA 01 NORTH SHORE DR 01 COUNTRYSIDE DR W 01 CASCO POINT RD 29 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 01 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 01 GANDER RD 11 EAGERNESS POINT RD C2 6TH AVE N 01 FOX ST 11 HOLLANDER RD 01 BOHNS PT RD 01 LOMA LINDA AVE 01 SMITH AVE 01 SUGARWOOD DR 01 TONKAWA RD 01 SUGARWOOD DR 01 CASCO POINT RD 01 FOX ST 04 CHEVY CHASE DR 04 ORONO LA 11 FRENCH CREEK DR 02 COUNTRYSIDE DR 29 COUNTRYSIDE DR 02 COUNTRYSIDE DR 02 CASCO CIR 11 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 01 WATERTOWN RD H WILLOW DR N 11 ETHEL AVE 02 ORONO ORCHARD RD 01 LINDEN AVE 24 PARK DR 01 SHADYWOOD RD 01 TONKAWA RD 24 SUGARWOOD DR 01 TOGO RD 29 SMITH AVE 01 NORTH ARM DR 11 LIVINGSTON AVE 01 DEER RUN TR E 33 NORTH ARM DR 02 LIVINGSTON AVE 01 I.IVINGSTON AVE 01 LIVINGSTON AVE 01 LIVINGSTON AVE 01 LIVINGSTON AVE 01 24724959 36332561 12862092 19206592 29337717 29337717 29337717 29337717 35531445 35531445 00000000 24701208 24701208 ie2664J8 34477185 22244771 18238046 35453797 89411138 35360667 00000000 29387500 29337200 35453797 34282826 19289262 14766768 00000000 34733680 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 34283677 00000000 00000000 34701208 39296767 34748366 37542199 37542199 00000000 24722316 00000000 54734300 14311200 15532726 14746776 00000000 15532726 15532726 15532726 15532726 15'’ ■’26 WESTON> A MECH CONTJIACTORS FIRESirS CORNER MIKE REMER CONSTRUCTION HOME UPDATE CO THOMPSON PLBG THOMPSON PLBG THOMPSON PLBG THOMPSON PLBG GUYERS BUILDERS EXPRESS GUYERS BUILDERS EXPRESS STEINKRAUS PLBG INC STEINKRAUS PLBG INC TOWN fit COUNTRY REMODELING STATEWIDE GAS SERVICES INC RYAN PLUMBING fit HEATING SELA ROOFING FIREPLACE CENTER AQUA ENGINEERING, INC. MARSH HEATING fi. AIR COND LEE PLUMBING CULLIGAN FIREPLACE CENTER PRACTICAL SYSTEMS AULIK fit LULOFF STICKNEY AND SCHWARZ STEVE SCHMIT PLUMBING HEATING & COOLING TWO STEINKRAUS PLBG fit HTG VOGT FRED fit CO ABEL/B fit C INC RIVER CITY SHEET METAL RIVER CITY SHEET METAL BENNETT PAULSON SCHUETTE NICKLOW RITTER RITTER RITTER RITTER HASNAIN BENNETT GREENE CARPENTER CARPENTER ANDERSON MCKEE DAYTON TRUBECK DOEPKE NEWMAN BOCKMANN HORNER NASIR BUESING MACMILLAN CARLSON MOEN KOPP JORGENSON JORGENSON JORGENSON AMUNDSON KELLENBERGER HILLSTROM JENSEN G HOMMEYER SHEARER NORDLIE DEVEAU COPPIN PLBG SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE JOHNSON REILAND CONSTR INC EAGLE CREST NORTH WEST ALAN NIKOLAI CONSTRUCTION GLASSCO HORNER SHIN STICKNEY MAZER EAGLE EAGLE EAGLE EAGLE EAGLE CREST CREST CREST CREST CREST NORTH NORTH NORTH NORTH NORTH WEST WEST WEST WEST WEST 1.995.00 3.800.00 4.950.00 17.300.00 23.250.00 23.250.00 .00 250.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 4,000.00 4.000. 00 300.00 8.200.00 2.000. 00 400.00 3.750.00 1,000.00 .00 8.900.00 .00 17.000. 00 209.53 1,000.00 1,000.00 130.000. 00 25.000. 00 2.500.00 4.600.00 45.000. 00 4,000.00 3.000. 00 8.000. 00 7.500.00 2,000.00 .’,500.00 r.200.00 4.500.00 2.115.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 500.00 .00 12.360.00 .00 20.500.00 110.000. 00 6.200.00 48.000. 00 110,000.00 110,000.00 110.000.00 110.000.00 MO, 000.00 WED. DEC NUMERICAL PERMIT NBR 1, LISTING , ISSUED 7:54 AM CANCEL ADDR NBR NOVEMBER 1999 STREET WORK ID NUMBER COMPANY OR-012177 99/11/30 N 3704 LIVINGSTON AVE 01 15532726 EAGLE CREST NORTH WEST OR-012178 99/11/29 N 2865 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 01 19390808 PARAGON DESIGNER & BLDRS OR-012179 99/11/24 N 1070 TONKAWA RD 24 27800555 COMMERS CONDITIONED WATER OR-012180 99/11/24 N 2515 KELLY AVE 24 27800555 COMMERS CONDITIONED WATER OR-012181 99/11/24 N 1369 NORTH ARM DR 24 37241899 RESIDENTIAL HTG & AIR INC OR-012182 99/11/24 N 3465 CRYSTAL PL 24 34458585 RON'S MECH INC OR-012183 99/11/24 N 1160 TONKAWA RD 24 34748366 ABEL/B & C INC OR-012186 99/11/24 N 3095 CASCO POINT RD 01 34282826 PRACTICAL SYSTEMS OR-01218'’99/11/30 N 2825 CASCO POINT RD 02 14752097 BOYER & SONS INC OR-012188 99/11/24 N 2755 DEER RUN TR E 01 34789558 DITTER INC OR-012189 99/11/24 N 185 BEDERWOOD DR 01 34791600 COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C OR-012190 99/11/24 N 2285 FRENCH LAKE RD 24 34791600 COUNTRYSIDE HTG A/C OR-012191 99/11/24 N 2850 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 01 39296767 VOGT FRED & CO OR-012192 99/11/24 N 1580 BOHNS PT RD 01 29331780 SYMINGTON PLBG OR-012193 99/11/24 N 2580 DUNWOODY AVE 10 00000000 OR-012194 99/11/24 N 2104 SUGARWOOD DR 01 38560500 CITY WIDE MECHANICAL OR-012195 99/11/24 N 2108 SUGARWOOD OR 01 38560500 CITY WIDE MECHANICAL OR-012196 99/11/29 N 3025 WATERTOWN RD 16 00000000 OR-012197 99/11/29 N 140 SMITH AVE 01 29334793 ROYAL PLUMBING AND HEATING OR-012198 99/11/29 N 2655 SHADYWOOD RD 24 33230108 RAMSEY HEATING & COOLING OR-012199 99/11/29 N 3675 JACOBS MILL RD 01 00000000 OR-012200 99/11/29 N 205 NORTHGATE RD 01 13311337 DEMPSEY TERRENCE OR-012201 99/11/29 N 3590 NORTH SHORE DR 04 00000000 OR-012202 99/11/29 N 2735 CAROLINE AVE 10 18943600 K DESIGNERS OR-012203 99/11/29 Y 2735 CAROLINE AVE 10 18943600 K DESIGNERS OR-012204 99/11/29 N 3556 LIVINGSTON AVE 10 18943600 K DESIGNERS OR-012206 99/11/29 N 4520 WEST BRANCH RD 32 17876635 TEKNISCAPES OR-012208 99/11/29 N 450 ORONO ORCHARD RD S 01 29296767 NEU PLUMBING OR-012209 99/11/29 N 3675 JACOBS MILL RD 01 00000000 OR-012210 99/11/30 N 1685 FOX ST 02 34748366 ABEL/B 6c C INC OR-012211 99/11/30 N 3465 CRYSTAL PL 24 28274033 NORBLOM PLUMBING CO OR-012212 99/11/30 N 255 LANDMARK DR 29 14042984 METRO HANDYMAN OR-012214 99/11/30 N 1209 FRENCH CREEK DR 24 54734300 SULLIVAN'S UTILITY SERVICE OR-012215 99/11/30 N 2601 CASCO POINT RD 05 14710532 DANBERRY COMPANY OR-012216 99/11/30 N 185 CRYSTAL CREEK RD 01 27844792 HOKANSON PLUMBING INC OR-012217 99/11/30 N 1780 SHADYWOOD RD 29 00000000 OR-012218 99/11/30 N 550 OXFORD RD 01 24724959 WESTONKA MECH CONTRACTORS OR-012219 99/11/30 N 145 BROWN RD S 01 14752097 BOYER 6c SONS INC OR-012220 99/11/30 N 145 BROWN RD S 16 14752097 BOYER 6c SONS INC PAGE 3 OWNER LAST NM VALUATION PITRILLO 110,000.00 750,000.00 2,400.00 HARDTEN 1,995.00 WHARRAM 1,978.00 KRUEGER 3,000.00 STEVENS 2,150.00 HOFFMAN 200.00 YORKS 20,000.00 WILLIAMS 19,265.00 2,200.00 LANDIS 4,000.00 ROVIK 900.00 15,500.00 NAFUS 8,000.00 KRAEMAR 8,500.00 10,000.00 .00 HUNT .00 HADEN 1,300.00 AMENT 250,000.00 UNKNOWN 3,000.00 FEGERS 25,000.00 HEBIU 17,878.00 HEBIG I'’ 978.00 LONG 8,286.61 EASTMAN 3,920.00 GARNETT 1,550.00 AMENT .00 CASHMAN 7,000.00 KROEGER 400.00 CASEY 4,000.00 LUX .00 HEDBLOM 40,000.00 PATTERSON 12,950.00 115,000.00 WINiON .00 395,000.00 WINTON .00 -*r 1 01 Residence 02 Addition 03 Garage/Attached 04 Garage/Detached .. 05 Porch 06 Deck 'i' 07 Fence 08 Gazebo 09 Pool 10 Re-side 11 Re-roof 12 Tennis Court 13 Sign 14 Dock 15 Shed 16 Demo-Principal Structure 17 Demo-Accessory Structure 18 Move 19 Commercial 20 Institutional 21 Storm Dama-?*^ Ifepilr 22 1-100 Cubic ifarcs 23 101 Cubic Yards or More 99 Undefined LOCAL USB CODES 9999 Undefined 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Replacing Existing Lifting Principal Residence Well Abandonment Foundation Only Temporary Trailer Renovate/Remodel Accessory Structure Stairway to Lake Retaining Wall Entrance Monuments Tree Removal i 1 1 b- ' 1 REPORT NBR. BPRMTISS-1 DATE OF RUN 12/01/99 PERMIT TYPE Deleted QTY 0 Grand-total 0* REPORT NBR. BFEERPT2-1 DATE OF RUN 12/01/99 BASE FEE PLAN REVIEW SURCHARGE Lie. SEARCH FEE SAC INVESTIGATION DEPOSIT ESCROW PERMIT TOTAL NOVEMBER 1999 *«««* PERMIT ISSUED REPORT CITY OF ORONO PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE -- CURRENT RANGE - 11/01/99 - 11/30/99 -- PREVIOUS RANGE - 11/01/90 - 11/30/98 BASE FEE 0.00 VALUATION 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 QTY 0 BASE FEE 0.00 VALUATION 0.00 PLAN REVIEW 0.00 0.00* 0.00** 0.00* 0.00** 0.00* 0.00** 0* 0** 0.00* 0.00** 0.00* 0.00** 0.00* 0.00** *****PERMIT FEE REPORT ***** CITY OF ORONO FROM 11/01/99 TO 11/30/99 PAGE: 1 REQUESTER: CAROLE USER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 REPORT TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > t ■ 1 ^ ■ ••in .V \ k■^k