HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-06-27 On Site Sewage Treatment Inspection ReportOn rbr• A'orlib Sbare of
take Stinnetonkir
ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
INSPECTION REPORT POST OFFICE BOX 66
1335 S. Brown Rd.
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
OWNER &10141 T LI1% ---
PERMIT NO.'S. 11 -r -e DATES
c �--
ADDRESS
CONTRACTORS
City Ordinance No, 210 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono he inspected on a regular baso. The on-site sis op
treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below
[Thisis it an existing system ❑ new const.u;tion)
Q/ Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects rely ing to design, construction, and location. Appears to tie operating
properly.
2 Does not meet all current City standards lot new construction 11978 Codel but in most respects appears to be designed
located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes. System appears to be functionrn9 properly: no major
upgrading of the system is requirec; at this tutu.
Q3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design, contiructron, or location. Appears to be operating
adequately at this time, but hat a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgradinq of system is required at
j this lime.
5 4 System may or may not meet current City ttandMdt la desigih, construction or location. but is failing to propetly treat and
k(� dispose of the may
input, and is endangering a water supply, or is a source of pollut-on to surface Of groundwater%, or is
creating a safety horaid, or is otherwise creating a public nuisance. Please contact the City Inµiector to dHCuts system repairl
replacement procedures. If rhainlield replacement is necessaty, sod tatting will usually tie requited, and a design and tate Wan
must be submitted for review. Your contractor mutt obtain a permit before work is started.
SYSTEM CONDITION 1 ® Checked items mev require your action)
Tank inspection indicates
Q Pumpoui not needed at this tome.
IT}I Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump -
ad out this year to help prevent future problems.
❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a Lrttipl level. Tanks
should be pumped out as soon as possible.
Cl System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped
within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge.
❑ Inspection risers missing -tanks could not in inspected.
Inspection nNrs (4" dace. pipe) must be inioWled in each lank
at next pumpout. II tanks hoe not been pumped out within
the last Mesa years, MeV should be pumped out now
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
Limiting Sore Factors
❑ Slope
❑ So l
❑ High water labie
❑ Lot sore
❑ Lake, wetland, or stream
❑ Drainage
COMMENTS
- -- Date of Inspection
(-J Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle IDoes not
give accurate measurement of solidi accumulation.) It tank -
have not torn pumped out within the last three years, they
should be pumped out no ov
Drainfeeld inspection indicates
❑ Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
❑ Some "dance of surfacing, not critical yet.
iA QLaintteld is saturated and visibly dtfictiorging untreated
elflwl car cep, n con iUon may require r a
mart ori ens io drrnlielld�, CCAMttait�-t —S Chi lris for
�apattiatuat ba _� slain go dart.
❑ Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
Potential for System Failure
Site Capabilities for
fdepen(h on sod types, water
Future Expansion
cable and system conrtitoon)
❑ Adequale
.) LoveFair
1] Medium
l J Poor
% 14,901m
O Inadequate
vstem ars causing visible
surface discharge
�- - ptnc System Inspector
Note In the event that this inspection report it used to satisfy the rlquuemrrno toe a mortgage or other transfer of peolierty, tie advised that
this report doe, rut guarantee or certify that an emitting system will continue to function properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy
of the system under current conditions based on thr available rnlotmatton
This rrpott mutt lit krill on the permiwe with %ysirrn location and pumping ircorth
Will TF COPY I In%Iwctor'sFile GOLD COPY j tlrnnrownrr