HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-10-31 On Site Sewage Treatment Inspection ReportOn the• ,%'n►tb Sbure o f
Lake- .Nn)nr'tonka
ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
INSPECTION REPORT POST OFFICE BOX 66
1335 S. Brown Rd.
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
�
:73-7367 1
OWNER , 1)"j,r k ADDRESS Pdlt ?t 1.
PERMIT NO.'S. -- DATES CONTRACTORS —
City Ordinance No 210 requires Mat each onsite sewaP treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular bans. The on-site sewlip
treatment system at the above eddies hall been inspected and appears to fall into Category Category checked below
(Thrs n FO an a■rstirg rstern ❑ new cOmtruction) M "1'1 iY•. +' .
Q1 Malts or *it current City standards in all respect& totaling to resign. construction, and location. Appears to be operating
properly.
2 Chas not meal all current City standards for new construction 11978 Codel but in most respects appears to be designed.
loco ad. and constructed genarally in accordance with previous codes. System appears to be functioning properly, no major
uprodrng of the system is required at this forme
Dq Does not meet current City standards in many respect& relating to dn'gn, construction, or location. Atxwors to be op
adequately at this tome, but hal a relatively high potential for future problems No major upgrading of system is required at
this time.
❑ 4 System may or may not meet currtnt City standards for design, construction uc location but is failing to Iworwily treat and
dispose of the current input, and is endangering a water sumAy. W is a source of pollution to surface or gioundooti or is
creating a safety hazard, or is otherwise creating a public nuisance, Please contact the City Inspector to discuss system repairl
replacement laocedures. It drainitetif replacement is necessary, sod testing "oil usually be required, and a d►sgn and vote plan
must be submitted lot review your contractor must obtain if hermit before work is slatted
SYSTEM CONDITION 1 1:0 Checked items miry require your actionl
Tank inspection indicates
❑ Pumocrut not needed W this time.
❑ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump-
ed out this yaw to help prevent future prohlems.
❑ Solids accumulation in tanks ars at a critical IMI Tanks
Would be pumped out M soon M possible.
❑ System is dsch rgtng to surface. Tanks must be pumped
within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge.
❑ Inspection nears mrutng tanks could not be inspected
Inspection risers itt" die wipe) must be installed in each tank
at next purnpout If tanks hal not been pumped out within
the last three yeast, they should he pumped out now
Inspection pipe is located directly over tank ',raffle. IDoes nut
give accurate measurement ofsolidi accumulation.I If tanks
have not teem pumped out wl thin the last three years, they
should be pumped out now
DrainliNP inspection indicates
L7 Dramfisld ars dry, no surfacing eirmdent
L7 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet.
I Orarnfield is wtmeled and vnidy discharging untreated
effluent to the surface. This condition may require teplace-
meet or additions to diarnhold. Contact the City Inspector
unmedNtely Repeirf must be completed within 90 days
1 Otainhold extent and condition unknown.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
Limiting Site Factors
Potential lot System Failure
Site Catssbd,tin for
Cl Slope
Ide Lands on tool typal, water
F utwe E xpanuon
❑ SWI
table. and system condi loon
I * A;Iegwrr
❑ High waisr tabs
Low
Fair
❑ Lot fire
Medium
Poo'
❑ Lake, wetland, or stream
High
loadequati•
❑ Dra,nap
[ 1 System it causing m ble
suitor" d-schot,w
COMMENTS
/ Ate/ vr- -�—
Oala of Instwo.trs,n Septic System Inspector
Noir In the event that this inp"chon r"tiott is used to fat'sly the requstrments lot a mW lgage or other Iransler of property. till advised that
this report does not guarantee or ceUrfy that an lxtsiinq syslrm will crintin' in function properly. but is m"eiy an Opinion of the ado •uacy
of the system under current conditions based on the available mtotmation
Th s r"Imnrt must Ir kept un the gimme% with my Nim location and punmping iecot(h.
Will IF COPY r InNorc loris F .Ir GOI D COPY I Flnnmrowne'