The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-18-2002 Planning PacketPublic A ttendance Meetlng D ate //- /.jP'^^ O C ouncil E3^ Planning C ommission □ Park C ommission □ Other Please filloutthe information requested BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. PRESENT FOR (from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER TI '1. 2. 3. 4. ' /yU,i t ^ ^02 >2ft 47 /•ils fi,, r, kJ 6. /\pp£Tt — L«. ‘V £' \,‘ tit ,''T^ 7. 8.. 9.. 10.. 11. rt^_ L. # V •3>^ / O 1 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Smith & Planning Commissioners Mike Gaffron, Planning Director November 16,2002 Various Topic of Current Importance Paul Weinberger Resignation. Planner/Zoning Administrator Pau.' Weinberger announced on October 22 that he has accepted a new position with the City of Minneapolis in their GIS department, where he will be working with Geographic Information Systems, computerized mapping, and providing support for various departments. Paul’s last day with Orono was November 5. Wendy Bottenberg Promotion. Wendy has been promoted to the position of City Planner with a commensurate increase in salary. Department Structure. It is the City ’s intent that the Planning & Zoning Department structure be changed from one entry level planner and one senior planner, to two mid level planner positions, to better match the Department’s workload. To this end, we have begun the search process to hire an additional City Planner who will share responsibilities with Wendy. Wc hope to have the new person on board by January 1. December 2 Planning Commission Work Session. We have scheduled a work session for Monday, December 2, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Topics for discussion include: Latest on Commercial PUD & Navarre ‘Visioning’ Building Height and Massing What constitutes a rebuild (finalize) Variance renewab’lity - how long before a ‘new’ application is needed Guest apartments/guest houses - review ordinance interpretations and policies - Other topics of interest January - February' Meeting Schedule. Both the January and February regular Planning Commission meetings fall on holidays. The City ’s official meeting calendar has not yet been set for 2003, hence we have some flexibility in when to set these two meetings. They could be scheduled for either Tuesday. Wednesday, or Thursday directly following the third Monday, depending on when we e.xpect the best PC attendance. Options for January arc: Tuesday Jan.21 Options for February are: Tuesday Feb. 18 Wednesday Jan. 22 Thursday Jan.23 Wednesday Feb. 19 Thursday Feb. 20 Please check your calendar, bring it to the meeting hlonday, and wc will determine the best option for each month. Thank you! ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Monday November 18,2002 6:30 PM 2750 Kelley Parkway - Council Chambers AGENDA Council Representative: Jim Murphy AUDIENCE MEMBERS: Please sign in for the public record at the front podium if you wish to address the Planning Commission. Applicants will be asked to move to the front table to answer questions when the Chair announces the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for the December 9,2002 City Council meeting unless otherwise noted by the Chair. CONSENT 1. U02-284S Peter and Amy Goshgarian, 100 Orono Orchard Road, Variance (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) 2. #02-2849 Steve Jacobson, 4185 Sixth Avenue North, Variance (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) 3. #02-2851 Kevin Curley and Wendy Kellett, 1291 Briar Street, Variance (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) OLD BUSINESS 4. #02-2834 RobertandJulie Wiens, 1425 Bay Ridge Road, Conditional Use Permit (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) NEW BUSINESS 5. #02-2846 Loren Pellett, 4753 North Shore Drive, Vacation (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) 6. #02-2847 James Nystrom, 1725 Concordia Street, Conditional Use Permit (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) 7. #02-2850 John and Patricia Walker, 1318 Spruce Place, V'ariances (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) 8. #02-2853 Aulik Design Corporation, 955 Tonkawa Road, Variance (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) 9. #02-2854 Kevin and Janet Manley, 1973 Eagerness Point Road, Variance, Conditional Use Permit, and review of landscaping plan (Staff: Mike Gaffron) SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS 8:00PM 10. #02-2852 Jennifer and Troy Koopman and Dwight and Patty AfTeldt, 4753 Tonkaview Court and 4765 Tonkaview Lane Rearrangement of Common Property Lines (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS II. Report of Planning Commission representatives attending Council meetings October 28, 2002 and November 12,2002. 12. Other issues for discussion. 13. Planning Commission approval of minutes for October 21,2002. 14. Selection of representatives for City Council meetings on November 25,2002 and December 9,2002. ADJOURNMENT J K -*0 L north • Hfvisco* w. ^ aia Pih i.9M aam. a,ffu ttPt i^«4i A*< )0,»M «C<, M.SM ic^r. f, ffl9 S. tfti A^w t. nn 4^ l<.iffS wJ ^ ^rr-v—----------------- . . . TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Wendy Bottcnberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner November 15,2002 SUBJECT: #02-2848 Peter and Amy Goshgarian 100 Orono Orchard Road Variance -- Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) 22,278 s.f.(.511 acre) Exhibits: A Application Surveys Elevation Views (3 options provided as of 11/15/02) Photos of Property Plat Map Property Owner’s List B C D E F Pertinent Code Section: 1. Section 10.28, Subdivision 5(B); Side Yard Setback: To permit the conversion ofattic space to living space by raising the roof where the existing residence is 28’ from the side lot line where 30’ is required for the RR-IB zoning district. Application Summary: The applicants have requested a side yard setback variance to convert attic space to living space. The existing residence is located 28’ from the side lot line where 30 is required in the RR-IB zoning district. Discussion: The existing residence was built in 1960. The property is located in a two acre zoning district. However, the property is in a neighborhood of substandard lots more in character with one acre zoning standards. If one acre zoning standards were applied to this property the residence would meet the 10’ side yard setback. The proposed project w ill not increase the amount of lot coverage by structures. The footprint will remain the same. #02-2848 Ptfter/Amy Goshgarian too Orono Orchard Road 11/15/2002 Page 1 of2 Turning the attic space into living space requires raising the existing roof. The applicant has not provided floor plans but has provided 3 optional views of the new roof line. The new roof line will need to meet the 30’ height requirement. Based on the elevation view provided by the'*" applicant, it appears this will not be an issue. The applicant is aware of the height limitation and will design the project to meet it. Statement of Hardship: The applicant has included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1. The existing residence was built in 1960 prior to current zoning standards. 2. The raising of the roof will not affect the adjacent neighbor. 3. If the subject property were in one acre zone, it would meet the side yard setback requirement. 4. Lot coverage by structure is not increasing with the proposed project. 5. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the side variance to convert the attic space into living area of the existing residence with the condition the project meets the 30’ height requirement. Additional Survey Work Required areApplicants have provided a partial survey confimiing ihe existing right side setbacks which the subject of the requested variance. However, the only other survey on file does not conlimt the setbacks for the remainder of Ihe house. Staff is concerned that the addition and/or Ihe proposed overhangs on the rear of the left side of the addition may encroach into the 50 ’ required tear y^_ Applicants will be required to provide a survey contlmiing setbacks for the entire house before this is forwarded *o to Council. #02*2848 Petcr/Amy Goshgarian too Orono Orchard Road 11/15/2002 Page 2 of 2 1 A CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE AFFUCATION Initial Ai5|;>Iication Fee $250.00 (SSO.OO per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-confoiming structures $250.00 Afler«the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address I DO Otohjo tiLtMht4> 1^0._______________ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) OZ- Xf Application # ^ 2 S* Date Received -2.1'O’i- Amount Paid Qr ' Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: ✓V'residential ___pother (specify). Zoning District: K g I 6 ^_________________________ .(month/year) APPLICANT + hfii Name Pietcr SosHs^i^t^rJ _____ Address: 100 o^Lono t-o City: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) *fS’Z ~ ^73'Z TZ. Phone (work ) ^s"2 - ______Zip: Phone (home) Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ so, cco _______ Describe request in detail: u4Af/ft/ir rv (attach additional sheets if necessar>) VARIANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area Lot Width y Setback: Front X Side Hardcover Rear .Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance^^j|i,Zoning Code requirements: CuttitsM' srxHcru^ /j arr^/t ^S/^c /evGAMSwMoK^rs — A 2 /=crr u^04nr /-/tuir fvFH, d^ur.________________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) #2^O ■71 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS X'1. 2. 3. X 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Owners List of ovvTiers within 150', labels and plat mao fvou ^ fir.",“r!"r-reproduction. - t*«x<o CM4at ^ ^ vj x ii tor ici ---- ^“*^7 (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existine grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) coov 8'/,” /l i •• 1 «’^‘sting UsTo^f th^’^^^'T (provide one (1) copy 8^*° xVr)’- ^ rf P--s\vitran interest in s... ^ — applicant(s) if not current ownerfs) __ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of i^TSer __ persons you Nvish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested bv the 7onl„a X'™ e'er T'? Date /*//tAApplicant's Signature OWNER’S SIGNATURE Mty’rrthrproAm^°bt eftv sm^^ n nte^bers ^ Owner's Signature Date /^// M 9 Applicant must have all submittals into the Citv offices 75 Hive h-r^ra. ,u m morntf^'r ’’'“"li"® Meetings are held on the third MondVif^h month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planninp 7 /• /— 4 t t if-- %. W jl :—'?|Cj - C—-3 ^------ i*-»' « /!T ^ < 3 S > o => S« 5< S c 3j L> D Q OO o* 3 H W iN 3 • •• • • LU ^ COUJ < O L l J O (O O UJ (D -C I <D > O Q. E o <1^ sz c O o ^ o 0) 5 C O•~ x; -(D o -C ^ L.cn o c Q. .52 Q. X (D -w O c c o O) V4- 0) o O “Oco • mmm -♦—» o ^ O t! 0) 0) ^ x: o w.-e <0 ^ -♦-> O ,S? c(0 <y LJ o:q clq :; < l^rXoo 5^ C <D ^0= S > 2 q:oo inoL.J _i OOD zo p o W ^ r— • TJ P p -i-j :c ^ T=.£ Xi >\ 0) 0) 0) ^ c0> <D h: J E o “D “O O) E 3cncn D c D Coa. 3 3 0) o to ^ O X)L. 0> Q> b ^ Ir c 0 x: 1 to in .. C7>c • «M» i-o \ 'i r.0*/i' \ \ \ \ (B) - 4> 'b. \ \ Sr /v!'/::! \Cartiricate of Sui*voy; I hertby certify tfutt this is a tree end cor- , I'ect representation of a survey of the boundaries of: (a) Lot 6l except tho Southwesterly .15 I'eet thenjof, Crono Ci'chards, end (P) lot 74, the Sotithvestorly 15 fact of Lot 6l, and tho Southeasterly 35 fe ft of Let 75, Oreno Orchard.''., Qiy: of the location of all buildinjts thorocn. It dees not purport to chov other if.provonentsi or cnoroach- laonts. A » WTEs Soalo lute 1" = 50' 6-5-75 Iron Riirkor Land Surveyor and I'lanncr Lon^; Lake, Minnesota THIS SURVEY WAS DONE FOR THE PREVIOUS OWNER OF THE HOUSE (OEOROE TOMAN) BEFORE IT WAS PURCHASED BY PAUL SCHLEICH. THE "PROPOSED DIVIDING LINE" ON SWLY 15FEET OF-LOT 6l IS MOW THE ACTUAL DIVIDING LINE. CL : ■ ■. ■ --'.t t .. /’• ••• 0 ’ 'V m 3«^tsti*ivia m"mm'kmMM i-x ICC J OXIl C'.L)v: ^mm m-. X ■ &' ”lK:y P'-,vT ■■ -S' •'V XrP:y-i<'-^k^-- ' i?' ’• .• ^iSferv: ■'- ■ f<-'*0>iS i. • i . / ii* ^••':, •• *,' ,*. * fd I':•>■?. ';•*' !*.'•• ■>••* •'■ t.’^-v.' -»’4^4B35v» %. *t %I^ kJ2-*2S:5 ■£) c ■> ' r ^ / V C'' c I \C r » v£ •- ^ -J KiAesttu^f * • V * • * • vr- m ♦•f :-rVi — i*,Vvj‘f li • -<^-' >9 ■ •: .\,.V.t- - -V;i. •■ •'. V> .'4 -J' 4 .. . r:^. ,1 .211.:lii"r -^’ Cl. v-i r^ j’V ■ - ‘jt ■V •/ 1.^ 1. t«M1 Wi Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Departm^til^ ORONO GOLF COURSE / 02.-in- :i3- Parcel Information Parcel ID 0211723210032 House Number 100 Street Name ORONO ORCHARD RD This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from CHy. County, and ^tale road authorities and other sources. s .A Vi. RUN DATE 10/16/02 BATCH 506 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORHATXON SYSTEH fROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PX635601 PAGE 22 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AODR 36 02-117-23 21 0016 00115 SNXTN AVE CRAIG NERTZENBER6 ETAL 'CRAIG HERTZENBER6 115 SNXTN AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 36 02-117-23 21 0022 00110 ORONO ORCHARD RD S J L WYFFELS I N J WYFFELS JANES L I NAUOE J WYFFELS 110 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA NN 55391 36 02-117-23 21 0031 00095 SNXTH AVE J A D AHLBERG JANES H t DIANNE R AHLBERG 95 SNXTH AVE WAYZATA NN 55391 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR 36 02-117-23 21 0032 00100 ORONO ORCHARD RD P S COSHGARXAN ET AL PETER S COSHGARXAN ANY GOSHGARXAN 100 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA NN 55391 36 02-117-23 21 0033 00120 ORONO ORCHARD RD S VINCENT DAVID COLLINS VINCENT DAVID COLLINS 120 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA NN 55391 36 02-117-23 21 0037 00060 ORONO ORCHARD RD S D E 6 C N WHITELEY D WHITELEY/C NYERS-WHITELEY 60 ORONO ORCHARD RD S WAYZATA NN 55391 PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 36 02-117-23 22 0005 00265 ORONO ORCHARD RD S VILLAGE OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY NN 55323 TOTAL BATCH 506 00007 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORNATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Wendy Botlenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner November 15,2002 #02-2849 Steven Jacobson 4185 Sixth Ave. No. Variance ~ Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IA One Family Rural Residential District (5 acre) 44,249.79 s.f. (1.02 acre) Exhibits: A Application B Survey C Septic Information D Elevations E Plans F Photos of Property G Plat Map H Property Owner’s List Pertinent Code Section: 1. Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B): Front Yard Setback: To permit construction of an attached garage/bedroom addition to be 41.3 ’ from the front lot line where 100’ is required for the RR-IA zoning district. Application Summary: The applicant has requested a front yard setback variance to construct an attached garagcA)edroom addition to the existing residence. The proposed attached garage/'bedroom addition is to replace an existing detached garage that will be demolished. The proposed attached garage/bedroom addition is to be located 41.3’ from the front property line, where 100’ is required in the RR-IA zoning district. The existing residence is 51.9’ from the front property line, where 100’ is required in the RR-IA zoning district. The detached garage being removed is 46.7’ from the front property line. The detached garage was constructed in 1963 and met the setback required at that time. The property is ser\ed with an on-site septic system and well. Matt Bohemian, Septic Manager. re\ iewed the proposed project and did not find any issues. The well is located on the north side of the residence. (Between the residence and Sixth Avenue North). «t02-2849 Steven Jacobson 4185 Sixth Avenue North 11/15/2002 Page 1 of3 The proposed attached garage/bedroom will result in an increase of structural coverage on the lot to 1,723.62 s.f. (3.9%) where 6,637 s.f. (15%) is allowed. jr •• Discussion: The existing residence was built in 1945. The existing residence is located 51.9’ from the front property line. The property is located in a five acre zoning district. The subject property is substandard at 1.02 acres. The interior layout of the house would make it difficult to construct a functional attached garage/bedroom at a location not needing a variance. Also, offsetting the addition to the south would begin to impact the mound system. Hence, the proposed front setback variance. Statement of Hardship: The applicant has included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1. The existing residence was built in 1945 prior to current zoning standards, prior to current zoning standards. 2. The structural coverage on the lot is increasing but still below the allowed 15%. 3. I'he well and septic system are in location that are not affected by the proposed addition. 4. The adjacent properties are not affected by the attached garage/bedroom addition. 5. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the front yard setback variance to construct an attached garage/bedroom addition. #02-2849 Steven Jacobson 4185 Sixth Avenue North 11/15/2002 Page 2 of3 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area: RR-IA Lot Area Required S acres Actual 1.02 acres Structural Lot Coverage: Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 44,249.79 s.f.Allowed: 6,637.5 s.f. (15%) Existing: 1,358.9 s.f (3.07%) Proposed: 1,723.62 s.f (3.9%) tf02*2849 Steven Jacobson 4185 Sixth Avenue Nonb 1 1/I5/2002 Page 3 of3 -k Application U ^2.- Date Received /O'Z^^'OZ Amount Paid .<^7 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 Afrer-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address H/ pj^ HL Auf . (N / ^ ^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ‘3 ^ - //.9 - J ? / o.7o Y Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.ication Date Proper^ Acquired______V / / C < I (do) (d5^t) also own the adjacent parcels of land. .(month/year) Present use of property: v^^fwidentitd Zoning District: other (specify). APPLICANT Phone (home ) V7 3 'iJ0 ^ Name v) Q.r .n u c rJ Phone (work ) .,~7Ap- VJt o • V/ 7 o Addres^ (ni-U. Axjr. A/ Citv: (- ^ c, L/x ^C l Zip: ^ ^SF OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ( Phone (home). Phone (work)_ Address:City:.Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost ^ o o Describe request in detail: d 3^/0,^h Z, ^ ,-v c. <r"^a . ^ A ^ tu’Xc.iy^ A C 4 &/>-C U f ! (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area Lot Width ^ Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) IIARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual properfy- conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of tht following information mint ho submitted bv the applicaHon d«»arf|inf fluff flrder for vour application to be gnn»Heri.H rnn.pl>#e! ..... ' - Completed Application Form ---- Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat man fvou must obtain fhic list J___r.____Tf______,r,_ Z. ^ I 2,, »iumi iauc;i:> iina piai map (VOU must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Fmance, A-603, Go\1 Cenfer, 349-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/S" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/i" x 1 1" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy Sid" x 11") List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in foe property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff Applicant and Property 0«rar must sign this application. Please remember that y,ui Mrihlltt lPPliMH()ll IS not fomnlet. if Ihe nhny, infnrm.tinn I.,, n„, K... APPLICANT'S SIGNATimE The applic^t hereby agrees to provide ail information requited or requested by the Zoning Adm.n.stralor, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered W original fee payTnt) Md/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application,' uid^cettifies ufat the mfomiation supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature _ 5 6 7 8 Date ^4 g OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable memb^rfo^' Commission memberT™“cnmembers for purposes ot investigation and verification of this request. '-ouncii Owner’s Signan re f7 . . a> —• rx ^ Applicant must have all submittals into the Date ^xr..sa.aa^.„.. syc.uujj. r.cuuung ^.ommission Meetings are held on the third Mondav ot each cZmisstaf ind"c ’”“'1 (he PlanningCommission and Coune.l, If an appi.eant is unable to attend a scheduled meetina nlease make arrangements to have an authorized acent attend in vnnr wi j 7 . picase & zoning Office of this change prior 'o . / ■ Q . a. ^ V t-i ■V iV .. ' 1.1 fjo-) i # Properfy Oescrfptfon fos pronchd dy cif&ntj Th€ mest 24S00 os mooswwd oi rigOf ongiss, of ihot poft of the noftO 23 ocrss of ths fhfthsost Ouortof of tho NOfthoost Cuoftor of Ssciho Jf fomnshp ffS, Pongs 2J (fsng soufA of Counfy Rood No. 6, wAkh mos formsrfy oNo knonn os Stats HigAsoy No. ttOL \MXS . ffCf -------------if/,1— — ^ % ♦ sefif^ ^ V '■ I ^ r ms o Osnotss iron monument jiOOO.0 Oonotes existing efe^» 0 Denotes utiAfy pots Area: 44.i49.79 Sq. ft. (t.02 acres) ^ ^ ' t tsar , see s the South line of the North 25 Acres of AST t/4 of Nf t/4. DEMAXS-GABRIEL lAND SURVSYOKS. INC. MM BuUr teM Mk pqm—tt. mt U44T nm*sns) **» MM ru 4Tt$) tse-44Tt 1 A«r«*/ 99tiitr U«l Ol0 marmy fMm m wo pwpuoS M «• w mnSto ms ditwi ampmriatm mmS ttal 1 om • Sufy Htgldsm tsmS Siarmsor mmSm tAo hw oi U« fUto •/ **--itmtiL i# muws^A m§ tkla 4a Ms •/ MOt. QO^.Ch.^ SIh Mo. ness M—k-~S%S9 4CO-S9 5rolo /• - JO*DmHd H C^wk awm, Jk«. Jiiw 0414 N89 ’tr'51 "£245.00 , *>»■ ' PREPARO) FOR: r Mr.Steve Jacobson ▼V' a £ Q- Prcrerty Oescnptfon ('os p>x>vfdeo tv c/ientj >t »esf ^eef. os r*7eoso'e%/ of r^ght ongks^ of S */■-.* i. c^ cf r>crfh ^5 ocrfs of f^e Afcrfkeosf S'^o'-fer c^ the Sc^fheosf Ot/orte^ of Sec (too Jt, 'cm^se p ftjrpe 2J iy>r>g south o* Coun*/ fhod \c C. mn c*> ecs 'termerotsc ^notm os Stete Aj* 7/4,7 !S § ® Denotes tron monument rDOC.O Denotes existing e ee, <$> Denotes utitity pore /9 So n (t CD acresJ \•o % 'Cl ^ AMUon^^ w-r- ’ ''/ _ V4-f4 ? M)4 f ns ting > House > % jnnno ^ t.ePi---------- /oooo .'C>4 e U9i / ^ ♦ septf4 ^ ttreo .3^ I 1 $90^ 9S90 The South Lme of the \orth 23 Acres of h'f t/4 of htf -^'opcsec Aooton t re cottons to Match Cxistmg House- ^1 V Ki % 5t - ?. I r 9064^ I B-t 9090 N8rtf '5/ "E 245. OO '«59 '^ seep • nEMARS-CADElEL 1 barabr eorifH tbsl UUa nraas plan or ropori wa proporo4 hp mo or %im4or mr tfirrrt ovporrMon om4 that 1 am a 4tUf na$iatrrr4 Lao4 Surroror um4or iko ton ot Iko SUlo ot tttmnoooia Aa ottroopo4 bp mo ilUa «IA 4ap of Ortobor. bOOS nto No. t/esp PREPARCD FOP: iWn SI HVEYOHS. ISC. yOSO Harbor Lana No r/.miout/i. UN iS4 47 rkone(?e3f 3S0-O9OH Book‘‘Ca go 409-69 Mr. fat iTCSI SS9-O470 Scalo 0on4 S Crook Mum. Hog No U4t4 r m JO’ $r- nC i Steve Jacobson y 0A->S<7^ SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY Address: 4185 Sixth Ave. N. Building Type: residence Permit^: 7015 System Type: mound 31-118-23 11 0004 BRs Install'd fcr: 2 J In Musa: No Date of Permit: 6/13/95 Installer: Don's Backhoe Experimental: no Appliances:Indry SYSTEM CONDITION Conformity: 1 Tank Condition: 6 DF condition: 11 Failure Pot: low SEPTIC TANKS Material: precast concrete Setback to Bldg: Capacity: 1000,1000,1000 Cesspool: no DRAINFIELD Length of Lines: 90 # Lines: 3 Trench Width: 10 Treatment Area: 56*40 Type of Filter: rock,clean sand Soil Boring: yes Tile Size: 1.5 Under Tile: 9 PcrcRate: 49.7 Setback DF-Bldg: 10 DF Ht above \Vt: 3 Soil Type: silt>'clay loam, clay loam Limitations: water table iVELLDATA Setbacks - Well-Tanks: Pump Type: subm. INSPECTION RECORD Well-DF: Report in File yes Depth: 108 Diameter: 4 Method: drilled PUMPOUT RECORD DATE 6/28/95 7/24/96 10/20/99 DESCRIPTION COMPLIANCE DATE GALLONS replacement installation 1 no surfacing 1 code system, no surfacing, pump tanks 1 'iii '.'j O f I X ^ V/gS A^AJ, G. r- •• N \ / \ N r *■ - ij.i ,v • • ^ r.rs* i|..^ •/ ,/ f €% .;. -• S W >? ib ».) jri' ~4 •Cv .;0 O ‘'3 i^Tttfi II - •« 4 rv*'---------------- ^nigri . ■ !*';r..^''' - V A ^1 north CLCVATION c i-f f .. - <iJ .1 * (' \y\ i[ ^ \s » V. -' ■ '•^ ‘ w, ;i c -.!: .1'^» V ----- , .^ - 1^ i.i' WEST OXVATION ii ,;I CJ) e v) • ; I r •aata NJ f i-t* \ix 1^ !.»' •v». ••• tj> '-■ '- s t I I • • r / I, \ ..'I I • ••% • I ^ i u3Z7j ■«•»«•••••••• 777/A7////a n I iT i3 D.') '•. r s. ■ 1 ■ '■ ■ , ^ .■E ; / / ' 1" I * *. * t r \ r V.. .i P? '..i J “ %'.‘/iV .JK ' K ' '/('• ^■•' '■ ’" '■ i.|-w> ', 4 * > , *,. 'fii' 4^v; '■ % ■ i< mm i: t-’ ■'.r;-':. , '* '' ■•F- ■■' .-4-'' - , S?; N;:-Aj: ' V m ■ ? * V ■ " - n'^h r-K V i.iM I" §•#‘1 ^'4i‘.i||,.: / '/ ! 71V RUN DATE 10/18/02 BATCH 503 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI<«35^01 PACE 13 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 31-118-23 11 0003 08785 ORCHARD PARK RD ‘ R K A M A SANSEVERE t,ROBERT K i MARY A SANSEVERE 745 ORCHARD PARK RD LONG LAKE MN 55354 38 31-118-23 11 0004 04185 SIXTH AVE N STEVEN R JACOBSON STEVEN R JACOBSON 4185 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55354 38 31-118-23 11 0011 00575 KOKESH FARM RD J D LESLIE A N F LESLIE JAMES D LESLIE 6552 OXBOW BEND CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAfWE/ADOR 38 31-118-23 11 0012 00540 KOKESH FARM RD 0 E JOHNSON AKA CONNORS DAVID E JOHNSON 2540 DELAWARE AVE SUNFISH LAKE MN 55118 38 31-118-23 12 0012 04225 SIXTH AVE N C J A L L LUBBERS JR CYNTHIA/LAWRENCE LUBBERS JR 4225 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55354 38 31-118-23 12 0013 04235 SIXTH AVE N W AND S WYATT WILLIAM D WYATT 4235 N 4TN AVE LiiNG LAKE MN 55354 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 31-118-23 12 0015 04220 SIXTH AVE N RAJ HANNING JR ROBERT C A JULIE HANNING JR 4220 CTY RD NO 4 LONG LAKE MN 55354 TOTAL BATCH 503 00007 • i I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS XT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO^ THB^BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. I r TAXATION, TO T^ \ i ■mL ■ i: ■ ■ " '■ TO; Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: SUBJECT; November 15,2002 #02-2851 Kevin Curley & Wendy Kellett 1291 Briar Street Variances -- Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential District (2 acre) 17,500 s.f. (.40 acre) Exhibits: A Application B Survey C Topographic Map D Hardcover Calculations E Views F Photos of Property Pertinent Code Section: 1, Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B): Front Yard Setback; To permit a porch to be 22.4’ from the front lot line where 50’ is required for the RR-IB zoning district. 2. Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B): Side Yard Setback: To permit a porch to be 24.8’ from the side lot line where 30’ is required for the RR-IB zoning di.strict. Application Summary: The applicants have requested front yard and side yard setback variances to construct a front porch to the existing residence. The proposed porch is to replace an old porch that was removed when the house was resided. The proposed porch will be 6 ’ X 6 ’ (36 s.f). The existing residence is 28.4’ from the front property line, where 50’ is required in the RR-IB zoning district. The proposed porch is to be located 22.4’ from the front lot line where 50’is required and 24.8’ from the side lot line where 30’ is required. The property is located in the 500-1000’ hardcover zone. The existing residence and the proposed porch are still well within the allowed 35% hardcover at 21.2% (3,718 s.f). I he property is sewered. The proposed porch will result in an increase of structural coverage on the lot to 1.728 s.f (9.8® b) where 1,692 s.f (9.6®/o) exists and 2,625 s.f (15%) is allowed. #02-2851 Kevin Curle>/Wcndy Kellen 1291 Briar Street I I/I5/2002 Page I of3 L Discussion: The existing residence was built in 1912. The property is located in a two acre zoning district. However, the neighborhood is more in character with half acre zoning standards. If half acre zoning standards were applied to this property the residence would not meet the front yard setback. The proposed front porch still would re<]uire a front setback variance, however the porch would meet the required 10’ side yard setback. The proposed porch is similar to a front porch approved recently for Phillip and Constance Martin at 1230 Arbor Street. If you drive up and down Briar Street and Arbor Street you see many of the residences have front porches. History of Briar Street: Arbor Street is zoned RR-IB, most of the properties in the area are half acre lots. 1 he residences in the area were built prior to the current zoning classification. Because of this, variances have been applied for and approved in the area. Staff researched only Briar Street. Two were found for Briar Street. 1233 Briar Street: New deck Average Lakeshore Setback. 1261 Briar Street: New residence. Front yard 35.5 ’/50 ’ required. Side yard 25.9'/30’ required. Side yard Adjacent Street 15.2’/50 ’ required. Statement of Hardship: The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue, Issues for Consideration: 1. Does the Planning Commission feel the front porch is in character with the neighborhood? 2. The hardcover in the 500-1000 ’ setback zone is well below- the allowed 35%. 3. The existing residence was built in 1912 prior to current zoning standards. 4. The structural coverage on the lot is increasing but still below the allowed 15%. 5. The well and pipe are located 20’ to side (south) of the residence. 6. Other issues raised by the Planning, Commission. #02-285 1 Kevin Curle>AVendy Kellett 1291 Briar Street 11/15/2002 Page 2 of 3 T St<«fT Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the side and front yard variances to construct a 6’ X 6' porch on the front of the existing residence. ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area: RR-IB Lot Area Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) Actual 17,500 s.f. (0.40 acre) Hardcover Calculattons: Structural Lot Coverage: #02-285 1 Kevin Curicy/Wendy Kellett 1291 Briar Street II/I5/2002 Page 3 of3 Dbtance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Proposed Hardcover 500-1000'17,500 s.f.6,125 s.f. (35%)3,718 s.f. (21.2%) Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 17,500 s.f.Allowed: 2.625 s.f. (15%) Existing: 1 ’ s.f. (9.6%) Proposed: l,7.i. j.f (9.8%) Application # / Date Received /O-2,2-0 2. CITY OFJORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 Afler-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Amount Paid ^^5 6 PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address Bfi-ifid St /Z zc T Property Identification Number (P.l.D.) /O- • Zt-3 f AvCach legal description to application if not included on required survey. property Acquired MAY V vdo)also own the adjacent parcels of land. ,?'«scnt uie^f property: X residentirJ ___pother (specify) ■/.o-ning District:__________ .(month/year) AP¥^-wtCANT * « I Phone (home ) <^r -‘ Name kgViAJ Cu0.(.gY f (Oen OY K- j^cc^T Phone (work ) _____________ Address: Sr)A(1 STR,. P.o.floy^i City: (2g.ysTnc m/sj Zip: gS32S OWNER (if different than applicant) " Name Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:._ Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: fRo/JT Poftci4 ggPcA^crusMT. PcnCH^ uoA<, Opp UJHE/O NCuoS;ot7v)b, u,AS PM.roM ttowSg figsg ")__________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED ___Lot Area ___Lot Width Hardcover Lot Coverage N Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or nnusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: (attach additional sheets if necessary) #285 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of tht following information must h e submitted bv the application dgadling order for vour application to be conaidergd compigfp; 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. __ Completed Application Form Certified Propei^ Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-5910). ^ Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy SVi" x 11" for reproduction. ^ Topographic surv'ey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/i" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8‘/i" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owTier(s). — As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. _ Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that yoyr lariancg application is not complete if th e above information has nnr been inrin^pH APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE 'The applicant hereby agrees to provide ail information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is Sxp and ^ect to the best of hi^er knowledge. Applicant's Signature /{m/P71 j ^ Date [q -TZ-QZ- OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make anangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. C/ X 962.4 ^ I . V • SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)0-75’75-250’ 250-500’^00-1000^ y • • EXGP™® HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House • X ••• •filU.-S.F. Ltotli• • WUth *S.F. • X S.F. X _S.F. • • • X ••••.' ,• • • • • as•• ^lU:___ S.F. • • •. ••• . *.••• • 0, Drlvewsy • * *". .. X 'flS ■ -/a'oO''S.F. X •_ S.F. • # T), Sidewalk X ♦•/^o • • S.F. •X •_S.F. P. .Patlo/Deck X • S.F. X es _S.F. • • V.X •• •SJ. Tfndetlain X mz S.F. Pv Plastic X ___B __S.F. Or Fahdc n X • • _S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE rm-PAX tJOrklJSDTV ADCA TM 9nMTt •36g<a S.F. •I'TfiDO S.F. A • * .+ B •• XlOO »% • ^ FPOPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE * • * »1 llU>__S.F.A. House A ^ X „ . Wldch wa __S.F. •X _m s»? • X _«S • X3L Garaae X _*5 ______S.F. •• Tl rive wav X ^S.F. ___S.F.•X ^» TV iCM^q/alV X _ • • m•/QO ■■ S.F. S.F. - •** . • * . * • •X _• ^• •• # " . • ♦ •^ • tr PspTn/T)eck . ^ • • X ••• _• SaS• • i:¥. Z7-X F; Ltndscape Uadedaln By Plastic Or Fabric X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ‘ total property area in zone • A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + B- ■ dTia xlOO - S.F. r.F. S.F. ■ 5®F>-9-e00a 10:4OA FROM:TO: 9^25468755 P:E^2 I n ____ —— —1—E H t- • Oj (?■ D ^ c J't! — 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner November 15, 2002 #02-2834 Robert Wiens 1425 Bay Ridge Road Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acre) List of Exhibits: A B C SurN'ey Staff report and Exhibits of October 21,2002 PC meeting Minutes of October 21,2002 PC meeting Application Summary: This application was tabled at the October 21,2002 Planning Commission meeting. The applicant has made changes to the proposal and met with the City Engineer and Public Works Director. The new plan indicates a bemi to be constructed on the property that will have the following characteristics: • grade changes are 5' or more from the lot lines. • a 3:1 slope. • the toe of the slope will be at the sewer force main. • will range in height from 4’ to 8’ and in width from 20' to 50'. Conditional Use Permit Required (Section 10.03, Subdivision 19): A conditional use permit is required for land alteration of greater than 500 cubic yards. 1 he revised plan is estimated to require 1500-2000 yards. The property is located within a shoreland area. The CUP allows the City to notify surrounding property owners and requires City Council approval for such proposed projects. Land Alteration and Transporting the fill to the Site: 2,000 cubic yards of fill can be measured by the number of truck loads that will be required to transport the material to the site. A t\pical truck can haul betw een 10 to 15 yards of fill. 1 hat would mean a total of approximately 160+ truck loads would be delivered to the site. The access route to the property will be down Brown Road to Bay Ridge Road. Bay Ridge Road is a private road and the number of trucks hauling is a concern. The subject property is at the beginning of Bay Ridge #02-2834 Rcb Wiens 1425 Bay Ridge Road October 11.2002 Page I of2 Road. The trucks will drive to the site, drop the fill and back out onto North Shore Drive to BrowTi Road. The trucks will not be driving up and down Bay Ridge Road. Engineer/Public Works Comments: The City Engineer and Public Works Director have met with (he applicant and reviewed the new plan. Neither have any issues or concerns with the redesign. Neighborhood Concerns: At the October PC meeting a number of neighbors e.xpressed concern about the berm and its impacts on the neighborhood. It should be noted that; - the only neighboring property whose lake views are protected is the residence to the south, which will not be impacted. - in the 2-acre and 5-acre zones, allowing the berm to remain unmowed would not be violation unless it generates complaints that result in City determining it is a public nuisance.... - applicant intends to maintain the buffer of trees along the north boundar> of the site. - Neighborhood drainage pattern will not be negatively impact by the berm. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The applicants must obtain a land alteration permit from the city prior to hauling fill to the site. The applicants must contact Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for an erosion control permit. Erosion control measures shall be taken by installing a silt fence a-ound tlie construction area as shown on the revised plan upon receiving permit frorr' Citv and MCWD. A route map shall be provided to the city prior to the start of construction showing which county/city streets are to be used. Berm must have vegetation re-established immediately upon finished grading. W02-2834 Rob Wiens 1425 Bay Ridge Road November 15,2002 Page 2 of 2 N .li f •• DCMAR9 • RA9RICL IAN08LRVEY0B9.L\C. * "*o Denotes Iron aonteiefit 1000.00 Denotes eiliting elevition ^ Vin0td§ Cpn^ou^ ^ Pr0pp3*d C«cf«ur Desoto Vrai/>a^m, P^He^m ^ *w ^ ........—•—•*. ...... f./vA •no^ - eiVIB€0- II •1-02 Prvi5€t>* th4>’C^ Ptvi5gt7- So -2h ‘0^ ' r ---------------» -^spre 6 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Wendy Bottenberg. Zoning Administrator/Planner October 7, 2002 SUBJECT: #02-2834 Robert Wiens 1425 Bay Ridge Road Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acre) List of Exhibits: A B C D E F G AppFcation Survey Engineer Comments Sewer Map Photo of Property Plat Map Property Owners Notification List Conditional Use Permit Required (Section 10.03, Subdivision 19): A conditional use permit is required for land alteration of greater than 500 cubic yards. The property is located within a shoreland area. The CUP allows the City to notify surrounding property owners and requires City Council approval for such proposed projects. Application Summary: The property owner has requested a conditional use permit to permit land alteration on the property over 500 cubic yards. The project w ill be to build a berm along the northern border of the property jilong North Shore Drive. It will be located behind an existing row of large evergreen trees. The berm will aid additionally to screen traffic noise from North Shore Drive. In September 2002. the Building Official issued a land alteration permit allowing 500 cubic yards to be brought onto the subject property. Approximately 1.500-2.000 cubic yards of additional fill will be required to build the berm. 1 he applicants are obtaining the fill from projects in Long Lake. I he berm is proposed to be approximately 8 feet at the highest point and will curve as indicated on the surv ey (Exhibit B). The applicant has indicated that the berm will be hydro seeded with prairie grass and 30-40 evergreens will be planted on it. There currently is a row of smaller ev ergreens vx here the berm is proposed to be located. These trees will be moved and upon completion of the berm will be planted on it. The berm and plantings will have no impact on traffic sight-lines and would appear to have no negative impacts on site drainage. «02-2834 1425 Bay Ridge Road October 11.2002 Page I of2 Land Alteration and Tranf^orting the fill to the Site: 2,000 cubic yards of fill can be measured by the number of truck loads that will be requited to transport the material to the site. A typical truck can haul between 10 to 15 yards of fill. That would mean a totaf of approximately 160+ truck load« would be delivered to the site. The access route to the property will be down Brown Road tc '^idge Road. Bay Ridge Road is a private road and the number of trucks hauling is a concern. The subject property is at the begimiing of Bay Ridge Road. The trucks will drive to the site, drop the fill and back out onto North Shore T rive to Brown Road. The trucks will not be driving up and down Bay Ridge Road. The applicant has indicated the neighborhood has a meeting at the end of tlie month and one of the discussion items is the repaving of Bay Ridge Road. He would like the fill to be on the property prior to repaving the road. Engineer Comments: The City Engineer has reviewed the plans. The comments are attached as Exhibit C. • Sanitary sewer. The subject property is two lots combined. They have been combined as one tax parcel since 1995. The parcel on which the berm is proposed to be located has been vacant. The sewer line runs along the lakeside of the residence. There is a sewer stub for the vacant property but nothing is connected to it. See Exhibit D. Since the easterly leg of the berm appears to be near the cleanout, special attention will be needed in that area. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. The applicants must obtain a land alteration permit from the city prior to hauling fill to the site. The applicants must contact Minnehaha Creek W'atershed District for an erosion control permit. Erosion control measures shall be taken by installing a silt fence around the construction area upon receiving permit from City and MCWD. A route map shall be provided to the city prior to the start of construction showing which county/city streets are to be used. #02-2834 1425 Bay Ridge Road October 11.2002 Page 2 of2 A ApplicatioD ft Date Receh'cd 7-/7‘0Z Amount Paid iZS'O^ CITY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE' APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address jC. Aft Type of Application to be Fifed 'l .3'/V\ tv ^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) lO-11'1 c»- ^ ~ ("jT (*7 APPLICANT.-Jt^l'^ ‘ \' Phone (home) _______ Phone (\vork)_2Si2 __City _________Zipc:<.-^'7 I Name g>/-t X_______________ Phone (work) - i Address/«>/2 s £. .\ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name ______________________ Phone (home) Phone (work)_ Address City zp. Date Property Acquired 7/v, lr>?(month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - ______$ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application ______$175.00 Residential Accessory Use ______$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ______$225 00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ______$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg $325.00 Commercial/Industrial Use u."''''^250.00 Land Alteration Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75 ’ of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS ______$275.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) ______$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation ______$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision ______$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ______$375.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ______$100.00 Appeals ~ Other - see Fee Schedule ■ 5 -y f i \ :>£ I required submittals ^ Completed Application Form. _ Describe request in detail. ------ Certified Pro^rty Owners List of owners within 350', labels and plat m* Tvou miKt obt^ this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of A-6W,Gover^entCenter,.54e«t^.4,/2.jV^.5-7/0 -----S-omaUoiT*^ '■“f '“"'y . -----— Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey ■ ""^^s h eSon (S«). ““ List of the kgal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property Tins wouW include nantc(s) of applicant(s) if not current oWs^ Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). ^ SURMiTTFn rctafr ii SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS subn^SelJ^ ^ *“^85 of all documents, plans, etc. to l« The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this aonlicatim PIp-ic^. u u application is not complete if the above information has not been tocluded ------------------------------------Date 2. 3. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or reauested hv th^ 7 • Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered hv ^no ^ ^ and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this aoDlication ^n^ rt r payment) supplied is true and coirect to tlie best of his^er biowledge. information Applicant's signature UJ&nCL OWTVER’S SIGNATURE members for purposes of,investigation and verification of SriT^equ«t. — 9X7o 2- Ownefs signature -C e-Zi^r Applicant must have ail submittals into the City offices 25 davs before ihe pi • ^ Planning Commis.Mon Meetings are held on the third Monday of each fr« Commission Meeting, scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission imd Council' "if an^f‘’'i""“ ^ scheduled meeting, please make anangemenu to have an authorirerf a», , applicant is unable to attend a Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meetinr ** ___^6 .j- HENN COUNTY ROAD NO. 51 _______________ ................. ---------- ^ ^ aub £d^e f ^ ■tf^9«/ V/4 '/o^ a P-froc-Z-S *9-77// <9549 >(; >• f % V^ »«.*/—,‘«r /I /I ;>^^j/c^-K».^^>;-Kir.¥;->(^-V;y -^' ;f' ,:n ”“V /',Ji?«' •.V*t' V A n55^ ^4*fTVJ#ie ' pf 9^ .♦ —------------- / ' /. i ,<9«>4 5 •.s:|r / X . .^,{<-.\ -.r^'-r'^ y y .\ 055::\ /<* ^ ,j4' '' '/' 5 «■r< >f /C7 C,C1 ^ ________l~._./._„-«a —\—'^ :------- . .___________ / __________V -I.,'-?" X ?s m.jpi^ I / ‘ I /a 9 ■C4: -------^3/./P «95; 7 / .9/? A ' / :f'>/^I ':///>/ '/ / " 0? ^ « Vo'" / ION , d R. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 192, Hennepin County, Minnesota. \CT U. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 192, lying easteriy of Hennepin >er 15. and southerty of a line parallel with and 75.00 feet south of the north line I Registered Land Survey. easement over TRACT R per Document Number 569266. I easement per Document Number 883614. / . V / / Oo« 09 2002 ll:03Rt1 BONESTROO ROSEME RNDERLIK 6516361311 P- 1 c. ^ J Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers A Architects October 9.2002 lon«fir«o, ^n4«rlll« AJiocftiei, lnc.lt an Afflrmaciw Acilon/MM^ OpptciiMit^ fmpipygr .an# ffmplaypp OwnpP Frlncfg«Ui Otto Q. toneftreo. FI • Mervin t- Sorvaln. FE • Glenn It <ook. Ft • MoPeri O. Scf^cht Ff. • j€ffF A toyrifoii. FC. Sattlor Continctnif; FoPcrr W. loseni. FC. • Joiepn C Arwtcclk. Ff • Flchard £. Tbmcf. FL • Suun M Cbtrilh. CFA. Atiocletp FrlnciM^** Ketch A. Oordon, Ft • luOcrc ft. Ftfffefie. Ft. • FKhtfd W. Foicer. Fl^ Qtvid O. loikotj. F.f. ■ Altrk A Htnion. FE • Michael f Seutmenn Ft • ltd tL field, FC • Kennech F Anoerian. FC:* Merfe « loifi. FS. • Oavid A. Bonttffoo. MBA. • SkFiey F. WiUianuorv FE. • Agnts M. Ring. MAA • Alttn ViCti Scfwmdc. PM. • Tbomat W. Peterson. PX. • James R Maiand. FE • Miles B Jens vw FX. • L. FMitip Craeei ix FE • Otr^ J. Cdotftoa PE • Ismael Martinet. FE « Thomas A. ijffko, FE • Ihetdon J Johnson • Data A Grove. FS. • Thornes A. Bouthar. fS. • Bobtfft i. Oevtry. FE Offlceii S(. Fauf. St Cloud. Bochestcr and yiaifmar. MM • MtiwaMiee. \Bi • Chicago. <i www.aorwsiroo.com Wendy Boctenberg Zoning Administrator/Planner City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Wiens Land Alteration File No. 139-02-000 Plat No. 02-2834 Dear Wendy: Wc have reviewed the plans for the proposed land alteration on the Wiens property. The site is located at 1425 Bay Ridge Road. The applicant is proposing to construct a berm along the C. R. 51 frontage. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters: The e.xisting sanitary sewer located between the home and C.R. 15 should be located and shown on the plans. The proposed work should not place any fill over existing manholes and the site should be graded to direct water away from all sanitary sewer manholes. Manholes should be fenced to protect against damage i^rom construction activity. The berm should be restored with seed and fiber blanket within five days aflerfinal grading. Heis'y-duty silt fence should be installed between the berm and the C.R. IS and C.R. 51 frontages. The silt fence should remain in place until vegetation is established. Slopes on the berm should not exceed 3:1. If you have any questions please call me at (651) 604-4863. Yours very truly. bonestroo . rosene . anderlik & ASSOCIATES. INC. Tom Kellogg Cc: Greg Guppa. City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 • Sc. Paul, MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 ■ Fax; 651*636*1311 . . .* >—* >A.t t m ■iwimiiiwi.pi II -----w-aa^ir?»->w Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department s 9(f8)1 (16) 1ft(17) 72 90 90 Kyi 8 a » a(SI) in LkE 8 (6^) 8 175 CMOf(54) 8 175 ^(S3) 4 (55)2 m §7.9 §7.9 j S i 8 ^"(M) 975 797 5 f 0-/17- Parcel Information Parcel ID 1011723340017 House Number 1425 Street Name BAY RIDGE RD This is not a legally recorded map It represents a compilation ot information and data from Oty. County, and State road authorities and other sources. iart’.K-' \U RUN DATE tVOS/iZ MTCH 502 RROf AOim ONNER HANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR HEmiEPXN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT HO. PIA35A01 PAGE 5 3D 10-117-23 34 0005 01473 DAY RIDGE RD T R A H H HCCUNE THOHAS R HCCUNE 1473 DAY RIDGE RD WAYZATA HN 55341 • 30 10-117-23 34 0004 01405 DAY RIDGE RD SUSAN H KERDER A JOHN C HOlH SUSAN H KERDER A JOHN C HOLH 1405 DAY RIDGE RD WAYZATA m 55391 30 10-117-23 34 0010 00030 ADDRESS UNASSXGNED VIL OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO PO DOX 44 CRYSTAL DAY HN 55323 3D 10-117-23 34 0011 0003D ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ROY E AHERN HENNEPIN COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY 1400 PRAIRIE DRIVE HEDXNA HN 55340 3D 10-117-23 34 0012 00030 ADDRESS UHASSIGNED CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 DOX 44 CRYSTAL DAY HN 55323 3D 10-117-23 34 0013 0003D ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ROY E ANERN ROY AHERN 1120 FRONT ST HUDSON WI 54014 3i 10-117-23 34 D017 01425 DAY RIDOE RD R WIENS A J A WIENS RODERT WIENS • TOTAL DATCN 502 00025 • •i ^ 1425 DAY RIDOE RD WAYZATA NN 55S91 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS I 'T KUN date 0VO6/O2 BATCH 502 PROP ADDR OIINER MAHC TAMPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNl.1 NAHE TAXPAYER NAffE/ADDR PROP ADDR mmER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDP PROP ADDR ONNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 10-117-23 11 0007 00036 ADDRESS UNA^./ONED HCLEOO CHTY REG RAIL AUTH DAKOTA RAIL INC 25 ADAHS ST N HUTCHINSON HN 55350 38 10-117-23 31 0003 02060 NORTH SNORE DR L 6 GODFREY t N J GODFREY LYLE 6 I NORHA J GODFREY 2060 NORTH SNORE DR WAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0006 01380 RAILROAD AVE SHARON V EVANS SHARON V EVANS 1380 RAILROAD AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0020 00030 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 01395 BROWN RD P F I L KALEY PHILIP KALEY 1395 BROWN RD S WAYZATA HN 55391 0050 S 38 10-117-23 33 0002 02265 NORTH SHORE DR KINGSLEY H HURPHY JR KINGSLEY H HURPHY JR 2265 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA m 55391 30 10-117-23 31 0001 02010 SHORELINE DR HICHELLE HARIE HUDSON-HILLER HICHELLE HARIE HUDSON-WINER 2010 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA HN 55^91 38 10-117-23 31 0006 02000 NORTH SHORE DR CAROL A LA QUEY CAROL A LA QUEY 2080 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0007 01360 RAILROAD AVE HICHAEL J LASHER HICHAEL J LASHER 1360 RAILROAD AVE CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0068 01375 BROWN RD S CRAIG B SARHER CRAIG B SARNER 1375 BROWN RD S WAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0056 02160 NORTH SHORE DR P C I C D KRAHER PETER C 8 CHERr D KRAHER 2160 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 36 0003 01669 BAY RIDGE RD JUDITH K HCATHIE JUDITH K HCATHIE DANIEL J HCATHIE 1669 BAY RIDGE RD WAYZATA HN 55391 11 r It :f ■ I t ••• / 1*> /V REPORT NO. PI635601 PACE 6 38 10-117-23 31 0002 02060 NORTH SHORE DR K i L ERICKSON KEITH R ERICKSON 2060 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA HN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0005 01390 RAILROAD AVE GROETHE-HILL INVESTHENTS LLP GROETHE-HILl INVESTHENTS LLP 1810 LASALLE AVE HPLS HN 55603 38 10-1i7-2S 31 0008 02055 SPATES AVE HARIETTA H ANDERSON ET AL HARIETTA N ANDERSON 2055 SPATES AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 006938 10-117-23 31 01380 ARBOR ST T W A K S SHITH TODD W A KRISTEN S SHITH 1380 ARBOR ST WAYZATA HN 55391 I = 38 10-117-23 31 0101 01335 BROWN RD S CITY OF 0R0K9 CITY OF ORONO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 38 10-117-23 36 0006 01661 BAY RIDGE RD D W FLICK A K L FLICK DAVID A KARI FLICK 1661 BAY RIDGE RD WAYZATA HN 55391 •T . I -jr MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 21,2002 6:30 o^clock p.tn. VARIANCES Hawn moved, Mabusth seconded, to recommend approval of Applicatidn ^02-2835, Thomas Adams, 500 Orchard Park Road, approving the renewal oLydfiances that would permit relocation of the existing house to the ceater of the j>r^ert>’ and to permit an existing accessor}’ building to be closer to the front jM^erty line than the principal residence, subject to the conditions as approvejk^’ the original Orono Cit>' Council resolution of 2001. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. C. (#5) #02-2836 CHARLES VARIANCE JENNIFER PHELPS, 385 TURNHAM ROAD, Hawn mos’efk'^abusth seconded, to recommend approval of Application #02-2836, Charkylmd Jennifer Phelps, 385 Turnham Road, approving a front yard setback variance lonstruct an ll’X 9’ mudroom on the residence. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#3) #02-2834 ROBERT AND JULIE >VIENS, 1425 BAY RIDGE RO.U), CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6:35 - 7:20 P.M. Robert Wiens, the Applicant, was present. As the item was removed from the consent agenda. Chair Smith asked for public comment. Norma Godfrey, 2060 North Shore Drive, questioned the appearance of the proposed berm and what a 3:1 slope would look like. She was concerned about the preservation of a large row of pine trees which screens her property from the applicants and wondered if the berm would be maintained on all sides. Lorraine Kavey, 1395 Brown Road South, indicated that she had many of the same questions as the first neighbor. Page 2 of 42 ~ ’ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 21,2002 6:30 o’clock p.m. Weinbergcf explained that the property owner had requested a conditional use permit to permit land alteration on the property over 500 cubic yards. The project would be to build a berm, behind the existing row of evergreen trees, along the northern border of the property parallel to North Shore Drive. The intent of the bemi would be to screen traffic noise from North Shore Drive. Weinberger noted that the proposed berm would be approximately 8 ’ at the highest point and curve around as shown on the survey. The existing row of smaller evergreens would be removed and replanted on the berm. He pointed out that the berm and plantings would have no impact on traffic sight-lines and would appear to have no negative impacts on site drainage. Weinberger stated that according to the City Engineer, since the property was two lots combined in 1995 and the portion of the lot where the proposed berm would fall was vacant, there is merely a sewer stub on the property with nothing connected to it. Weinberger added that the design was done by an engineer and reviewed by the City Engineer who had no negative comments or concen.s. He stated that the widest width of the berm at 8 ’ tall could be potentially 48 ’ and still would not impact the stand of tall evergreen trees it would be located behind. Chair Smith reminded the applicant and Commission that the slope must not exceed a 3:1. Mabusth added that the manhole must be located and marked. Gaffron indicated that the contours of the design were misleading, and based upon his calculations the plan refiected a mere 1 ’ scale versus the normal 2 ’. He questioned whether the design reflected a 4 ’ or 8 ’ hir’’ at its peak. Wiens stated that he believed the design reflected a 6 ’ or 8 ’ high peak, however, indicated his willingness to redesign the plan in order to address neighbors concerns. Chair Smith felt it was necessary to determine the true height of the berm with and/or without trees. i Page 3 of42 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 21,2002 6:30 o'clock p.m. • With 6-8’ ITigh berm and peaks in the middle and on the ends, Wiens stated that it was his desire to cut down on the amount of traffic noise he was exposed to. Weinberger agreed with Gaffron that the plan provided to the City looks to be indicative of merely 4* high berm peaks. Wiens stated that the plans were incorrect if they reflect a 4’ berm. Bremer stated that the applicant’s summary refers to an 8’ high berm. Weinberger noted that, if the scale is 1 ’, the berm would be far wider than 20’. In order to maintain a 3:1 slope, Gaffron pointed out that the base would need to be twice as wide. Rahn felt the Commission would need to be supplied with a new drawing. Wiens questioned whether he could proceed with this drawing. Norma Godfrey maintained that the highest center point of the berm would fall directly across the street from her residence and she was concerned about having to view a big pile of dirt, as in other locations in the neighborhood. Wiens stated that it was his desire to construct a berm and he was willing to work with the neighbors to do so. Chair Smith pointed out that the applicant had agreed to accept the 4’ high berm in order to move the application for^vard, and she questioned whether this lower berm would satisfy the neighbors. Page 4 of 42 MINUTES OF THE OPONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 21,2002 6:30 oVIock p.m. Mrs. Erickson, located across the street on Highway 51, cautioned the applicant that a mere 4’ high berm “Would do little to eliminate the noise issue. She stated that in order to adjust the noise level, tliC applicant would need to construct a much higher berm, hopefully not at the expense of the large row of evergreens on the property. Wiens stated that the row of evergreens do provide a fair amount of blockage. Lyle Godfrey, 2060 North Shore Drive, indicated that his questions pertained to the height of the berm and how the evergreen treeline would be protected. He encouraged the applicant to use Bay Ridge Road for the truck traffic. Wiens stated that he wished to eliminate the light reflecting off the road and enhance the look of his property in the process. Lyle Godfrey slated that, as long as the berm were maintained, he had no problem with the application. Chair Smith encouraged the applicant to give careful consideration to whether he believed a 4’ berm would help with the sound problem. She asked for staffs opinion. Gaffron indicated that a 4-5’ high berm would not have a huge impact on the noise level and suggested Mr. Wiens consider additional evergreens. Gaffron stated that a denser row of pine trees would do more to lessen the impact of noise than a berm. Mrs. Kavey, 1395 Brown Road South, questioned what the applicant would plant on the berm, since her views would be impacted. She indicated that the proposed curv e of the berm near Bay Bridge Road would block her views of the lake Wiens staled that no matter what he proposed in order lo improve his current street views, it would impact Mrs, Kavey’s views. Wiens maintained that he has gone to great lengths lo Page S of 42 ~~ MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 21,2002 6:30 o’clock p.m. improve his property since moving in and would strive to beautify the project, planting evergreensTitop the berm, surrounded by prairie grass and wildflowers under the trees. Rahn questioned whether the applicant could truly accept a 4’ high berm, when what he was expecting was an 8’ high berm. Wiens expressed his desire to move the project forw'ard. Mrs. Kavey reiterated that the row of pines along the top of the berm would impact her views. Wiens stated that he must do something and again, would be willing to work towards a compromise \/ith the neighbors. Mabusth empathized, stating that she could see his goal was to improve his screen both visually and for noise control. Wiens stated that the existing trees would block 70-80% of Mrs. Kavey’s views of the proposed berm. Hawn stated that she was unclear what the issue with the neighbors was, since the trees would block most of the berm and the applicant has expressed his willingness to work with them. Wiens stated that there are a number of things he could propose, including building structure rather than berm, however he has chosen to construct and beautify his property with the berm and plantings. Wiens stated that he had no idea he would be faced with opposition from his neighbors when he proposed this application and was willing to tr>’ to work with them, but reminded them he could still go through the proper channels to construct something much more obtrusive than he has here. Hawn reiterated that Mr. Wiens has the right to do what he can to improve his property. She Page 6 of 42 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 21,2002 6:30 o*clock p.m. indicated that she was struggling to see how this could be a problem to «he neighbors when it would be nfostly blocked anyway. Chair Smith complimented the applicant on his willingness to cooperate with the neighbors and stated that, in reality, he could even remove the large row of pine trees on his property if he chose to. She indicated that instead he is proposing to improve his property. Rahn stated that, short of the berm issue, the applicant could plant rows of trees along and aroimd the curve without the City’s permission. Godfrey questioned whether he could continue to come back to the City to request additional fill. Gaffron stated that the City code does not talk about a maximum per year, but a limit, which could be even further defined in the motion. Wiens stated that he wished to do the project right and invited everyone to come take a look at his work. Chair Smith suggested the applicant consider either tabling his application in order to work with the neighbors, or moving it forward as the application exists currently. Wiens stated that he preferred to move forward sooner than later and asked for further discussion. Mabusth asked how many cubic yards of fill the Commission was being asked to approve at.this time. Wiens stated that application is for 1500-2000 cubic yards of fill. Gaffron pointed out that 700 cubic yards of fill would provide a 4 ’ high berm. Page 7 of 42 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 21,2002 6:30 o ’clock p.m. Hawn suggested they design a motion that defines the fill as the amount required to obtain a 4 ’ • • high berm and not identify a certain number. While he had hoped to proceed, Wiens stated that he had also hoped for a higher berm along County Road 15 than the 4 ’ in this proposal. He indicated that he would go back to his engineer in order for him to redesign the plan. Wiens felt he could stay within the 500 cubic yard allowance and still construct an 8 ’ berm along County Road 15 and then return next month with a different proposal for the rest of the landscaping. He asked the Commission to table his application. Hawn moved. Chair Smith seconded, to table Application #02-2834, Robert and Julie Wiens, 1425 Bay Ridge Road, tabling the appiicants request for a Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of redesigning the proposal. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. iLD BUSINESS (#6) #0fe2^3 RONALD CLOUD, 3460 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, VARIANCES 7:21 - 8:07 P.M. Ronald Cloud, the Applicant>^ present. Weinberger explained that, effective IhaNiftemoon, the applicant had revised his application to reflect his request to simply replace the previoil^ X 10’ deck, with the only addition being that a stairw'ay access be allowed off the deck. Weinbw^e^noted that the applicant has withdrawn his request for a three season porch. With just the replacement of the previous deck. Chair Smith noted thahhe applicant still is over his structural limit of 15%. She asked if the stairway would run off the front oh*jde of the deck. Cloud noted that the stairway w ould need to head towards the lake in order to avoid anKside Page 8 of 42 j 5" TO- FROM: DATE: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner November 15,2002 SUBJECT: #02-2846 Loren Pellett 4753 North Shore Drive Vacation of Lake Street - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1B Single Family Lakeshore Residential District, 1 Acre, sewered. List of Exhibits A B C D E F Application Site Plan/ Survey Sewer Map Topographic Map Plat Map Property Owner’s List Pertinent Ordinance: Section 10.12 Application Summary: The applicant is seeking approval to vacate 50’ of that portion of the unimproved dedicated right-of-way of Lake Street at the shoreline of his property. The right-of- way was originally dedicated in the plat of Bergquist and Wicklund ’s Park in 1888. Lake Street is an unimproved street right of way running along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka from east to west that currently varies from 17’ to 21’ in width. Lake Street serves no public purpose. There has been one other vacation of Lake Street. The property located at 4705 North Shore Drive was granted approval in 1996 to vacate that portion of Lake Street between its extended lot lines. (Exhibit E). Criteria for Vacation: Zoning Code Section 10.12 governs the vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds. In past vacation requests, the City has determined that vacation may be appropriate when: 1 The vacation doses not affect access to or use of any adjoining property. 2.The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve or use the dedicated right-of-way as road except for utilities and access purposes. 3. The unimproved dedicated right-of-way as it exists serves no public purpose §02-2846 Loren Pellett 4753 North Shore Drive Vacation 11/15/02 Page! It is staffs opinion that these three conditions are applicable to the segment of Lake Street right-of- way adjacent to the property. The Public Works Director has been asked to review the proposed vacation and agreed to proceed with the vacation finding no current or future public use for the 50’ right-of-way. Municipal sewer lines are not located within the unimproved ri^t-of-way. Therefore, no request for easements over the sewer is being asked for. The gas, electric, telephone and cable t.v. utilities have been notified of this request. None of the utilities notified had responded as of the writing of this report. The property owner’s legal access to the property will not be affected by the vacation of Lake Street, and no adjacent or nearby properties will have their access limited by it. Due to topographical constraints, this area of shoreline is not conducive to pedestrian movement, hence staff believes the existing and future public access to the lake will not be reduced or impacted by this vacation. Note that this property contains a bluff, having an average slope of around 50% from the house to the shoreline. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the vacation application as proposed by Loren Pellett for tlie property located at 4753 North Shore Drive. Applicant docs need to provide a new proposed legal description for the property prior to City Council review. U02-2846 Loren Pellett 475} North Shore Drive Vacation 11/15/02 Page 2 ^^__gjC=JO-200I I1:l3u Fro^in^ WMO ^95224946 I6 T-390 P.006/009 F-566 A ApplkatiftB# 03 S>gH_(^ D»teR*cdvcd <Q-9- ^ 00-2. Amount dTY OF ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Type of Application to be Filed -/-/ Property Identification Number (PJ.D.) //y __________ Phone (bomclCfS^) V'^Z~y'?^3____ O V_____ _______________________________________ Phone (work S V^/'^J Addreaa/<0V<LP lr>^ry Ci'/\f)c4 AiA Chv tip APPLICANT //oZ-A Name_4^!:^ PeK^T V O'WNER (if different dian aj^licant) Name______________!_____ Phone (home). Phone (woik)_ Address City Zip. Date Property Acquired (monthtyear) I (do) own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMTTS - _____S 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____S175.00 Residential Accessory Use ___$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ■ __$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _$325.00 Commercial/Industrial Use __$250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or mote ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75* of lakeshore PRD/PID • see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change fiom ori^hal application) Afler-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $275.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ constdtaitf fees) iVacationglcn!iItiiA $200.00 Easement Vacation $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $375.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule V V,:... J I • fiiiti V P y . « ' ; ^ *-5 «• j 011617 7'II7/.»J Lbliwitt) IM l.| '.l.inF* N ADVAiSCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Ilwy No. 101 MinneumU MN 5S345 Phone (932) 474 7964 Fax (952) 474 8267 SURVXY FOR: LOREN PELLET SURVEYED: December. 2001 DRAFTED December 1 1.2001 REVISED: ianuaiy 24.2002, lo ihow dian|ca ia hankover tabulanoos LEGAL DESCRIPnOK Lm 4. Block 6. BEROOUIST & ^^^CKLUNDS PARK, Hermepm Counfy, Minnesou. SCOPE OF WORK: I Sbowii^ the length and dtiectioo of boundary Itoes of the above legal descriptioo. The scope of our services does M inehide deiennioiog whai you own, wbkb is a legal ouner. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct, and that any nuners of rcco^ s^ as easements, that you wish shown on the survey, have been shown. 2. Showing the locatioo of exiscng iroprovemeais we deemed unportant 3. Setting new mooumems or verifying old monunienis to mark the comers of the property 4. While we have shown the boundary of the property as an exiention (dashed) of the ongtnal lot lines from the origina) shoreliiie shown on the plat to the ordinary high water mark, there are legal quesdom, that only a court can decide, on how the property the lots in this plat pin as the lake recedes should be divided amone tlic K»t owners If this is of sufTicieni interest to wanant the tapense and time involved in a legal proceeding, you cuuUl consult with an anomey about the procedure to get a ooun to resolve this questioo 5. Showing and t^wlacing hard cover and area of the lot for your review and for the review of such goverainental agencies as may have junsdictioo over hard cover requirements STANDARD SYMBOLS A CONVENTIONS Denotes 1/2* ID pipe ith plastic plug bearing State Lkciisc Number 9235, set, unless otherwise noted. 1 hcfcby certify that this plan, ^lecificatioii, report or survey was prepared by n r urn).*r my direct supervtsioa and that I am a licansed ProfcsiiooaJ Engineer and Professioiial Surveyor under the laws of ihg^ieofMkiaesou. VnTlTimvSLa n R-2802 15 L-29.75 ay Z^«0* 26‘20 H Piito P£. Sl P.S. No. MJS GRAPHIC SCALE ( W rE£T ) #2 T5 ^8 MINNETONKA R=2802.15 L=29.75 • •• • • ■ % ' k’j - CONCRETE • • >DRIVEWAY ‘ 213 to.fL - \a A CAKAGE P: ;i20 tq-fU^ ^.3 0////A ti—i nywj/3 ’ (tSTING RESIDENCE 1/ N 87*25'03* E OKmAKT HIGH WATER 0£VA7X)N •29.4 L4A MINNETONKA SHOROME AS OF '------12/9/aooi TOP Of WATER nEVAT>0N»92a.3 J)WG TO stACf^re!^ OIJ6J7 V V . 1 ••►/ 7 1 • •/• 210 420 •%' ’•- , H'jf‘'.i- ■ ;'I'!,'. 1.’ ’■ v^Vi.-i •.:.V.•■ ,‘.'. ‘t’Vv. :' ■! 'Hr,' -i ' f») :P: -/I J • • ' i .>'1 •'i .ii,-.. RUN DATE 10/19/02 iATCH SOS TROf ADDR OWNER NAME TAXfAYCR NAHE/AODR RROf ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADOR PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 36 12-117-29 91 0001 09S01 NINNEAPOLXS AVE C,S TNONAS I E N TRADER C S TNONAS SEN TRADER 9S01 NINNEAPOLXS AVE NOUND HN 55369 3S 07-117-23 32 0009 09736 NORTH SHORE DR CHRISTINE J SCHAN2ENBACH CHRISTINE J SCHANZENSACH 9736 NORTH SHORE DR NOUND NN 55369 3S 07-117-23 32 0012 09751 TONKAVIEW CT S A SCHAUER t F E KOUBSKY S A SCHAUER I F E KOUSSXY 9751 TONXAVIEW CT HOUND NN 55369 3S 07-117-23 32 0017 09725 NORTH SHORE OR J P HENRY ETAL J P HENRY 9725 NORTH SHORE DR NOUND NN 55369 36 07-117-23 32 0020 09753 NORTH SHORE DR L PEUETT i S PEULETT LOREN PELLETT 9753 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND NN 55369 36 07ni7-23 32 0023 09795 NORTH SHORE OR HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAIO CITY OF ORCXiO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY NN 55323 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INfORNATION SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 36 07-117-23 32 0003 09725 TONKAVIEW LA E I T CHRISTIANSON EARL t TERRY CHRISTIANSON 9691 TONKA VIEW LANE NOUND NN 55369 36 07-117-23 32 0016 09795 TCXiCAVIEW CT JANES R THONSON ETAL JANES THONSON 9795 TONKAVIEW CT ORONO NN 55369 36 07-117-23 32 0019 09739 TONKAVIEW CT LARRY A 6REENHAGEN ET AL L 6REENHAGEN I V GREENHA6EN 9739 TONKAVIEW CT NOUND NN 55369 36 07-117-23 32 0018 09731 NORTH SHORE DR DErmiS A NEVER DENNIS A NEVER 9680 NORTH SHORE DR NOUND NN 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0021 09755 NORTH SHORE DR G R EVERSON P H E EVERSON GARRY 8 NARIE EVERSON 9755 NORTH SHORE DR HOUND HN 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0057 09755 TONKAVIEW LA DANON S WRIGHT/NARV F DANON S WRIGHT 9755 TONKAVIEW LA HOUND NN 55369 JONES i.j REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 29 38 07-117-23 32 0009 09735 TOrOCAVlEW LA S V WHITMAN ONE WHITMAN STUART V WHITMAN 9735 TONKAVIEW LA NOUND NN 55369 36 07-117-23 32 0011 09757 TONKAVIEW LA T G OLSON I L N WALLACE T G OLSON 8 L N WALLACE 9757 TONKAVIEW LA HOUND NN 55369 I 36 07-117-23 32 0016 09731 NORTH SHORE DR DENNIS A NEVER DENNIS A NEVER 9660 NORTH SNORE OR NOUND NN 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0019 09795 NORTH SHORE DR HERMAN CRAWFORD ETAL HERMAN CRAWFORD 9795 NO SHORE DRIVE NOUND NN 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0022 09775 NORTH SHORE DR D E BOLL 8 S E BOLL DOUGLAS E 8 SANDRA E DOLL 9775 NORTH SHORE OR MOUND NN 55369 38 07-117-23 32 0056 09705 NORTH SHORE OR A H 8 T K RASCHER ANDREW H 8 TRACY K RASCHER 9705 NORTH SHORE HOUND NN 55369 •I ' (■u> I mm date 16/0 ?/o2 iATCH 5#8 MENNiPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORNATXCRI SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PlASSAfl PACE Sf PROP ADOR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR ^TAL RATCN 5oa RORia 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESEHTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORNATIOH AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECOROS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO.THVDEST OF NY KN0WLE06E AND SELIEF. DATE TO; Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: SUBJECT: November 15,2002 #02-2847 James Nystrom 1725 Concordia Street Conditional Use Permit — Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: Exhibits: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 acre) 39,450 s.f. (.90 acre) A B C D Application PlansA^iews Plat Map Property Owner’s List Application Summary: The applicant has requested a conditional use permit to permit a cupola to be constructed on a new residence. The cupola is proposed to be located within the central portion of the structure. Pertinent Code Section: 1. Section 10.75, Subdivision 1 : Height: To permit a cupola to be constructed on the roof of a residence to be 34.5’ where 30’ height is the maximum for the LR-IC zoning district. The code reads as follows: “No structure or building shall exceed 2 '/i stories or thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. Section 10.75, Subdivision 1: Special Provisions. The height limitations imposed by other provisions of this Chapter may be increased by conditional use permit by 50 per cent when applied to the following structures: A. Church spires B. Belfries C. Cupolas and domes which do not contain usable space. D. Etc.” The plans for the new residence includes two cupolas. One on the residence and the other on the garage. The cupola on the garage meets the 30’ height requirement. The cupola on the residence is proposed to be 34.5’ in height and 4’ X 4’ in size. The property is located on Lake Minnetonka. The cupola does not change the lot coverage by structure or hardcover on the property. The cupola is decorative and will not be used for living space. #02-2847 James N>-strom 1725 Concordia Street 11/15/2002 Page 1 of2 6 Discussion: This property was formerly two lots-1725 and 1745 Concordia Street. The new owner hasT purchased toth lots, demolished the two residences and legally combined the two lots. The new residence is currently under construction. The residence meets all hardcover, setbacks, lot coverage by structures and height requirements. Issues for Consideration: 1. Does the Planning Commission feel the cupola is in character with the neighborhood? 2. The cupola is decorative, not increasing living space. 3. The cupola does not increase hardcover or lot coverage by structures. 4. The new residence meets all requirements for hardcover, structural lot coverage, setbacks and height. 5. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: If the Planning Commission concludes that the cupola will have no negative impacts on the neighborhood, then approval of the conditional use pennit to allow construction of the 4’ X 4’ cupola on the top of the residence would be appropriate. #02-2847 James Nystrom 1725 Concordia Soreet n/IS/2002 Page 2 of2 ____A A XI C% r% A ♦ f ^-»** •• • i .• ^ ^ rj*L."..*\v» :•* ^ {';vr.**'* v'l // i • ^. r-.. / i Application# Q 2. -2g */ 7 Date Received io-^-OZ. Amount Paid J f<ro CITY OFT>RONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 6o«\cpc^?a ^Vre.e\ Type of Application to be Filed C. D r - M < i«) U. 4 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) YV - \\*V * 2.S - zz.- CCHH APPLICANT Name Address Phone (home) KAt. VWVsT»A<vec^ TXATArpAroAttl Phone (work)55i2ya^iSag5 ;s City T^i»^Vv ‘a^ev\ Zip OWNER (if different than applicant) Name J3aw^^^ K\*^ft>*hro^r«. Phone (home) 2Z>-62^ Phone (work) <atl,~ Address V^\ WVaCity Zip SSHl^ Date Propert^Acquired ITZtTi Joac RHSt Szmija^e^ _____(month/year) I (do) (j^^wt)^so owTi the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERiVDTS - $ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application $175.00 Residential Accessory Use ______$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) ______$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments ______$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg ______$325.00 Commercial/Industrial Use ______$250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain ____ Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS ______ $275.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) . S300.00 Vacation ______$200.00 Easement Vacation ______$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision ______$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ______$375.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule REQUIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form. —Describe request in detail. Certified Property Owners List of o%vners within 350', labels and plat man Vvou -------Attach legal descnption to application if not included on required survey ----chTiTill'eS ““ List of the^gal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the -■ Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). fuSdl™’ plans The Applic^t and Projwrty Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour appl.cat.on ts no. complete if the above information hi no. been included ---------------------------------------uate 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE s .r“.s liE rs» “ Applicant ’s signature Date lo/o/ /o3- OWNER'S SIGNATUL^ members for purpos^ investipatinn onH v .e.r..,.:L ; '^C'^bers, and Councilmvestigatioi^d verification of this request. Date /g/ /l>9^Owner’s signature sr/s r;hTm~ r rr~ ’p,rr.dr^^ »•*•w • i ■* *<JY - ^ * a / A* rupoli at the house is optional, cupola can only occur after the City of ved same, which requires planning f council approval. Contact Kyle Hunt ly construction of the cupola occurs. MTU. • , T • ; r * r - _ 1. .. , .• t :.... ] T/'-t ?“ 4*6» u-uei? ePHAuT fi.oop- ----rV~ 4 r h .JUS----- J ♦- --------i • I • : ^ : • 1' ,_F_ 'fS- I-—.-i. • r ---i -------it- r ! -I -A ,i--------------------1 i ‘ i , r - - ^ ^ • l^w * • — - - - - > . ------------ . - -------T*| « 1 . —X ► A t I __'' '• r ? “:n J-.4. -^ yf: l;| J I • 1 L_i uJLJ X ‘X i t I 1 i 1 f /Tu^C.-sVj; PF^^N l IP* ^OUUMiVt^/ ”f” F if -------- V- ^F oovb p-iFupeT^rJB. Pipi^ • r-11 , (V -6-4 1 n~ //7-2.3-<2^ Parcel Information Parcel ID 1711723220020 House Number 1725 Street Name CONCORDIA ST This is not a legally recorded map It represents a compilation of information and data from City, County, and State road authorities and other sources. HUN DATE lP/01/02 BATCH 512 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORNATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIA35A01 PAGE 28 PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR 38 17-117-23 22 8015 81825 CONCORDIA ST L F 8 S L CEHL LARRY I SHARON GEHL 1825 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA HN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0018 01785 CONCORDIA ST K T DULIN 8 B G DULIN KEVIN DULIN 8 BARBARA DULIN 1785 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA NN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0017 01761 CONCORDIA ST D HOLSTE 8 N HOLSTE DAVID 8 MARGARET HOLSTE 1761 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA NN 55391 PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 17-117-23 22 0018 01755 CONCORDIA ST GERALD W KLECKNER GERALD W KLECKNER 1755 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA NN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0#6^ MHH 01795 CONCORDIA ST JANES T NYSTRON JANES T NYSTRON 1701 NADISON ST N E NPLS NN 55913 38 17-117-23 22 0020 01725 CONCOkDIA ST JANES TVtfTRON JANES T Jl^RON 1701 naWiso)Pst N E NPLS NN 55913 7 ft ^ m 0 ■•••* PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 17-117-23 22 0021 01705 CONCORDIA ST J J 8 T R SACHS ET AL STEVEN H SACHS 9079 PEONY LA N NAPLE GROVE HN 55311 38 17-117-23 22 0029 01687 CONCORDIA ST J N GEKRI)«/K REINKE GEHRIfRS JOHN 8 KRISTIN GEHRING 1687 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA NN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0027 01760 CONCORDIA ST W D WOLD 8 S L WOLD WINTON D WOLD 1760 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA NN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0022 01685 CONCORDIA ST T L PALN 8 N A PALN TNONAS L PALN 1685 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA NN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0025 01800 CONCORDIA ST P D 8 K J HANSEN PAUL 8 KAREN HANSEN 1800 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA NN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0028 01750 CONCORDIA ST PAUL J BOZONIE PAUL J BOZONIE 1755 EAGERNESS POINT RD ORONO NN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0023 01695 CONCORDIA ST D J 8 D R BELAWSKI DONALD JOHN BELAWSKI 3819 COLORADO AVE N CRYSTAL NN 55922 38 17-117-23 22 0026 01780 CONCORDIA ST CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY NN 55323 38 17-117-23 22 0029 01755 EAGERNESS POINT RD PAUL J BOZONIE PAUL J BOZONIE 1755 EAGERNESS POINT RD ORONO NN 55391 PROP AODR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 17-117-23 22 0030 01790 CONCORDIA ST D J BELAWSKI 8 D C BELAWSKI DAVID J 8 DAYNA C BELAWSKI 1790 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA NN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0031 01690 CONCORDIA ST RICHARD E 8 KRISTIN L PALN RICHARD E 8 KRISTIN L PALN 1690 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA NN 55391 38 17-117-23 22 0032 01680 CONCORDIA ST B H WILLIANS/J A FESENNAIER BRIAN H WILLIANS JUDY A FESENNAIER 1680 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA NN 55391 r MM OAT£ l*/«X/02 ■ATCH 512 HENMSrXN COUNTY PROPERTY XNFORNATZON SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PIA3SA0X PACE 29 PROP ADOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SO X7-XX7-2S 22 OOSS •XOXS FA6ERNESS POINT RD N 0 t D L NCXEE HELVIN D NCXEE XOXS FAOERNESS POINT RO WAYZATA NN S5S9X SO X7-XX7*2S 22 OMt OIOSS CONCORDIA ST HOWARD R ALTON III HOWARD R ALTON III loss CONCORDIA ST ORONO NN SSS9X SO X7-XX7-2S 22 0003 01075 CONCORDIA ST HELEN K TRAINOR NEIL J ( BARBARA L TRAINOR 1075 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA NN 5539X PROP ADOR OWNER NANE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR TOTAL BATCH 5X2 00021 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORNATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. date 0 Y cr’:.. •«; *;)int A ,4• r*- JL • • iiili rtutififc I . 7 TO: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:November 15,2002 SUBJECT: #02-2850 John and Patricia Walker 1318 Spruce Place Variances -- Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) 14,501 s.f. (.33 acre) Exhibits: A Application B Survey C Topographic Map D Letter from Applicant E Hardcover Calculations F Elevations G Photos of Property H Plat Map 1 Property Owner’s List Pertinent Code Section: 1. Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B): Rear Yard Setback: To permit a deck/steps to be 1T from the rear lot line where 30’ is required for the LR-IB zoning district. 2. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L)(2): Hardcover in 75-250’: Within 7''-250' of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. Variance Request: To permit a 1 .irdcover variance to allow 4,535 s.f (36%), where 4,277 s.f. (34%) exists and 3,137.5 s.f (25%) is allowed. Application Summary: The applicant has requested rear yard setback and hardcover in 75-250’ setback variances to construct a 258 s.f deck/steps to the existing residence. Discussion: The existing residence was built in 1974. There have not been any additions just upgrades to the existing residence. A new roof has been put on the residence and the basement has been remodeled. There have not been any variances granted for this property. #02-2850 John Walker 1318 Spruce Place 11/15/2002 Page I of3 Rear Yard Setback: The proposed deck will be 258 s.f. The deck will be located 1T from the rear property liner where 30’ is required in the LR-IB zoning district. The rear property line is Grant Street. Grant Street is an unimproved right of way. It serves primarily as a drainage way and a pedestrian way, and the city has no plans to improve it. The topographic map (Exhibit C) indicates the elevation change from front to rear of the property. It also shows where the subject property lies in relation to Grant Street. Hardcover: The property is located in the 75-250’ hardcover zone. The existing residence and the proposed deck/steps increase the hardcover from 4,277 s.f. (34%) to 4.535 s.f. (36%). The property currently does not have a deck, therefore a deck is not included in the existing hardcover numbers. Lot Coverage by Structures: The lot coverage by stnaclure is currently 1,913 s.f. (13.4%). The proposed deck/steps will result in an increase of structural coverage on the lot to 2,170 s.f (15%) where 2.175.15 s.f. (15%) is allowed. Again a deck is not included in the existing lot coverage by structures because currently one does not exist. Statement of Hardship: The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicants should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1. The existing residence was built in 1974. 2. The hardcover in the 75-250’ setback zone is increasing to 36%, above the allowed 25%. Is there any existing hardcover that can be removed to make the property more conforming? Note that the location of the house necessitates a long driveway which uses up a large percentage of the hardcover allowance. 3. The property is unusual that it is surrounded on two sides by platted, but undeveloped right of ways. 4. The City is unlikely to vacate Summit Avenue or Grant Street, hence applicant cannot obtain additional land. #02-2850 John Walker 1318 Spruce Place il/15/2002 Page 2 of 3 5. The topography of the property changes from the front to the rear of the property, necessitating the retaining walls. 6. The deck/steps will not obstruct views of adjacent neighbors. 7. The property is wooded, at the end of the street, and surrounded by two undeveloped right of ways. 8. The deck/steps increases the lot coverage by structures to 15%. 9. The property is undersized for the zoning district, but was granted a variance to lot area in 1974. 10. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: If Planning Commission concludes that the unusual conditions and configuration of this properly are hardships that support approval of increases in hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback zone and rear yard setback variances to construct a 258 s.f. deck/steps to the existing residence where no deck currently exists, then a recommendation for approval may be appropriate. Options for Action: 1 . Recommend approval of variances requested. 2. Recommend denial of variances. 3. Table, giving applicant direction. 4. Other action. #02-2850 John Walker 1318 Spruce Place 11/15/2002 Page 3 of3 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area:' LR-IB Lot Area Required 43,560 s.f. (1 acre) Actual 14,280 s.f. (0.33 acre) Hardcover Calculations: Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 75-250’12,550 s.f. 3,137.5 s.f.4,277 s.f. (34%) no deck 4,535 s.f. (36%) 250-500’1,730 s.f.519 s.f.90 s.f. (5.2 90 s.f (5.2%) Structural Lot Coverage: Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage 14,280 s.f Allowed; 2,142 s.f (15%) Existing: 1,913 s.f (13.4%) Proposed: 2,170 s.f (15%) J m 4 Application U 0 2.-2.8SX> Date Received /C>^ZZ-0'^ Amount Paid •S'Z^O CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming stmctures $250.00 Afrer-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION . Site Address \?^\S •nLcLC.g.^___________________ Property Identification Number^(P.I.D.\ OS- 11*7 - OOlS Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired TDe.C.g.rv\4^e.r (month/year) I (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: X__residentid ___pother (specify). Zoning District: / ^ ~ I &____________________________ APPLICi^T X \ n Name rinV^n Lu. VA3Q.lKe.r Address: 1 ^ I 'Plo^.c.e, Phone (home) Q53l _____ Phone (worfc)___________________ City: Drono _________Zip: OWNER (if different than applicant) Name**Ri.t’-i'kfe \ ke r ^ " t it?b f\ U/Ck. { r Phone (home). Phone (work)_ Address: "Plate-_____ City: Drono Zip: SS2tUQ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $. Describe request in detail: Seg, gjtt.<\o.Kg.A ____________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ___Lot Width X Ha.dcover y Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side y Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSfflP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: See. ci,ttft..<Lhe tl____________________ A (attach additional sheets if necessary) 77’ c; i lr"ii liiMfiii II iiir ti /OO REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 2. N 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. N Completed Application Form Certified Prope^ Owners List of owners within 150’, labels and plat mao fvou raLc“G^^^ DepartmLfof Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover reproduS “ *" ^ for Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proiwsed. In addition, provide one (1) copy S'/," x 11" for reproduction^ etches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8'/," x 11") List of the legd names (include marital status) of all persons with an foterest in foe Propc'ty. This would mclude name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s) As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. ^ ^ Additional items as may be requested by City staff. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE -■^e applicmt hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoninn »tr"tor:\r:p!t;s7itt^r^^ t-'•>« information supplied is true and correct to the best of hisfoef biowledgT'^ LQ.Applicant ’s Signature Date ) (-) - yj - OZ OWNER’S SIGNATURE .“•sr.r :r“; members for purposes of investigation and verificalon of this request. ’ Owner's Signatun Qir^g;. vd^all submi Date Applicant must havd^all submittals into the City oflices '~2^d^vn;^fXrl • Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the iHrH^M month. Applicants must be present at all scheduleTrevilv ^ Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a make arrangements to have an authorized aaent attend in vour ni-^ meeting, please & Zoning omce of tfus change prior to the Icring ' ““ “ 1 -ril • ^T ‘ y 5' V 4 **»; y1 '*%r ^ {O 1 D o / / CCD ■« *f MIC 0? j;« L>_ 'F>t\sVia^6 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JOHN WALKER OF LOTS 9 tc 10. BLOCK 10. SAGA HILL REVISED HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA s B7*3i* 29** w S8 50 / GRANT STREET LCSAL OCSO>iPTlCN Of PqfMiSCl ; Lott 9 eni to. So;o m.ii 0 dtnotft 'ron rnSfUff • dt'^otot dittof»et ot tno*n on tNt plot of So^o Hill Rovtod 6«0'>n9t t*«0*n d'O dOttd gpcn on Otti/ntd dOtMn Tn t tw'**f •ntf'^Jt *3 $*a« mt tO-'*C3'««f ol mt oeo«t dtteriOOd P^OOO't*. tn« location 9* O'* t«'t?*n9 n-,|t q<^o int lOCOt'On ol O' I *it'bl# "nord<0«»«^“ t^tr#5n It d3*1 njl Pu'09't to t^cn ony ol^ff irrpr o» tmtn (t 0^ f nc^OOC^r^nl f c*t 9*Kn#*c« GRONBERC k ISSOGiTES, (NC *tc OOilA UM tP«^ m Ml «( OIXOM oo. i9C LML lit &5JS4 M2-4T1-4U1 • •oct* cnT* %*» n« iM:iro'«K on it*:#* ••• f « 0# MOC* ■« OmC* tL#t*««Dk «c iwr • m • aui* WBMC9 MOriHOMi OfloO mc wM ««• M OtViOM Mt U •-r-01 C2-^ SSPIO: r '^L=58.Q \ HENNEPIM cou^ <5 % C CP. ................... SETBACK LWE L!°£L**as \ % PATIO .A?.*..A. \ \ \ ........ \ >........ EXISTING house •o' BOlUot ,52t^ ............s 87»33' 29" w 88.50 I#, u«t. 929. c i*'*. ^ 7 ^O n^8 i ^5 / ^'/ '* 5 <« % 1/.5 10 (77) r* Aj/ 12 I ^2*S3 % • L'??."" I (la ^ 2 (13) (14) 1^^ (15) ’1A ’l3§. <—* i--f- ^/ 20 17 r • • •. ^o.p 64 (94) /• F :J ..........\-r—yz' • • 60 50 1 1 50 .' 50 1 70 1 0 % • ¥ / / * i (17) w:* 8l \‘ 229 250 1 (26) 226 % I (25)4 232 % • ®UJ ^ -0 • 95.8 o A (4) — I ,A«> ''' r 78.85 230.8 6 ^ 234.5 (Nl® iSDi,^ .. 133.11 «.2e (23)% I Attachment: Variance for 1318 Spruce Place Applicant John W. Walker 1310 Spruce Place (952) 471-7171 Description of Request Estimated Construction cost $8,000 This request for construction of a 294.4 square foot deck, is the first step of a significant property upgrade, which will transform an ordinary modular ranch style house of the 70's into a modem stylish residence comparable to other houses in the neighborhood. All of the improvements and upgrades, other than the deck, will be contained with the existing footprint of the house. All work will be carried out under Ron Anderson, Residential Dream Builders, Plymouth. MN, a Minnesota licensed contractor. Hardship/Description of unusual property conditions This non-lakeshore property is located at the dead end of Spruce Place and is surrounded on two sides by platted, but undeveloped city streets (also known as paper streets) (Portland and Grant streets.) Three of the four borders of the property are curved, not straight lines, resulting In an extremely unusual lot configuration. Consequently, the house, which was built prior to the passage of the current ordinance, is oriented in a unique fashion. The average elevation of the property varies by more than an estimated 20 feet from the front to the rear and 10 feet from side to side. The applicant has built several boulder walls to contain the property, and minimize the impact of watershed runoff. A timber wall protects a large oak tree from land shift erosion. The 250’ lakeshore setback line falls just inside the western boundary of the property. The only adjacent neighbor is the applicant who lives at 1310 Spruce Place. #2850 ^ •HARDCOVER CALCULA: SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* la:j:&o&{^orkshe £T /^5-250O 250-500’ KXISnNG HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______ X Lcof^ X X X Vidih » B. ' 'Garaje • • • •• • C. Driveway ^ • X X D. Sidewalk X X S3 S3 E. Patio/Dcck X X _______________D2:v'C: X , . VJ»£>P m~y R£^(u^ vvaM ‘ fOLj v/x\l I6>~1 TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN 20NP •A •• _______ +. B xlOO yROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE • A. House _____________ X Lcojih ■ Width. X X X B. Garage C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ‘ TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE' A______________+ B XlOO - //- /2 • 02_ 500-1000’ ' nzi.S.F. 4^ouse • S.F.C>|^m rs.F. r _S.F. f S.F. •• - , • ♦ ) S.F. tblACM-lop S.F. AT- S.F. ftCick S.F. 'pAro I S-F. ncx.i<_‘ — S.F.5* 7iac,c — S.F. Eo’-Cc* -r-* 1 • S '' _S.F. A la.. ~ S.F. B 4S34- % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. :.'M 1J.-A Vf s •hardcover calculation works SETBACK ZO?<E: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ;existing hardcover in zone A. House _____________ X Leofth X X X “ . B.* 'Garaje • • • •• • • C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE •A •• • _______ + R PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE ' A. House _____________ X Leojch X X X B. Garasc C. Driveway X X D. Sidewalk X X E. Patio/Deck X X F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X G. Odier /.■ 75-250*( 250-500* J 500-1000 n — IZ —I f Width zs. ts cs n <34 >• •••Sjlgocvl S.F. S.F. S.F. B % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. t. ii XUJ:! IKtiti i rr JOHN I PAT UiAIXER CCK&Tf^jCTEO DT «S<C>EKrUL 0«E>li BUlOm. NC. COPT1IXWTe»OV. I. Mm r & 0. Li zen-oiv? 3 Q. a! H km- w •' '^*" RUN DATE 10/07/02 BATCH 501 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR 36 07-117-23 A1 0051 , 01305 SPRUCE PL CLAYTON R FUCHS ^LAYTON R FUCHS 1305 SPRUCE PL HOUNO MN 5536<i PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 36 06-117-23 32 OOUi 01260 SPRUCE PL P J 6 S J SCHUELLER PAUL J 6 SUSAN J SCHUELLER 1260 SPRUCE PL MOUND MN 553b<^ PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 36 06-117-23 32 0017 01310 SPRUCE PL JOHN W WALKER JOHN W WALKER 1310 SPRUCE PLACE MOUND MN 5536^ PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 36 06-117-23 32 0026 01330 CHERRY PL JAMES G BULL JR JAMES G BULL JR 1330 CHERRY PL MOUND MN 55366 REPORT NO. PX635601 PAGE 1 36 07-117-23 61 0052 01376 NORTH ARM DR WILLIAM E BOWEN WILLIAM E BOWEN 60 PARK LANE MPLS MN 55616 36 07-117-23 61 0076 01295 SPRUCE PL HEFRIEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 36 06-117-23 32 0015 01290 SPRUCE PL RICHARD F A KATHLEEN A RICHARD F 6 KATHLEEN A 1160 TONKAWA RD ORONO MN 55356 KYLE KYLE 36 08-117-23 32 0016 01300 SPRUCE PL RICHARD F KYLE RICHARD F 6 KATHLEEN A KYLE 1160 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 36 08-117-23 32 0018 01318 SPRUCE PL PATRICIA A 6R0ETKEN PATRICIA A WALKER 1310 SPRUCE PLACE MOUND MN 55366 36 08-117-23 32 0026 01375 CHERRY PL KRISTIN SEIBOLD KRISTIN SEIBOLD 1375 CHERRY PL MOUND MN 55366 TOTAL BATCH r2 R7.1 O I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORNATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE feEST OF NY KNOMLEDCE AMO BELIEF. •J taaam 4^ TO: FROM Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE:November 15,2002 SUBJECT:#02-2853 Aulik Design Group 955 Tonkawa Road Variance and Conditional Use Permit — Public Hearing Zoning Disir jfct: Lot Area: LR IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) 147,935 s.f. (3.4 acre) Exhibits: A Analysis Worksheet Application Hardship Statement Survey Topographic Map Hardcover Calculations Sewer Location Elevations Floor Plans Engineer Comments B C D E F G ti‘ T J Pertinent Code Section: 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (6): To permit an encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. The total encroachment is appro.ximately 42 ’. 2. Section 10.03, Subdivision 19: Conditional Use Permit: Land alteration of greater than 500 cubic yards. The total fill to be brought onto the site is appro.ximately 2,360 cubic yards. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance and a conditional use permit for land alteration to construct a new residence on the property. Discussion: The existing residence was built in 1967 and has been demolished. Currently the property is vacant. The proposed location of the new residence is further back on the lot than the old residence. However, there is an existing sewer easement and sewer line which prohibits the new residence to be any further back on the lot towards the road. (See Exhibit F). The proposed residence will encroach 42 ’ into the average lakeshore setback. 1^02-2853 Aulik Design Group 955 Tonkawa Road 11/15/2002 Page I oi'3 ..wiiUMMk L. The property and adjpsent properties are heavily wooded and at different elevations. The topographic map (Exhibit D) indicates the elevation change from the north to the south of tfie property. Conditional Use Permit for land alteration: The propeny owner has requested a conditional use permit to permit land alteration on t'tic property over 500 cubic yards. The proposal indicates approximately 2,360 cubic yards of fill will be brought onto the site. The fill will be used to create a level area to locate the house, provide good drainage and create access to the site for motor vehicles. Average Lakeshore Setback: The proposed residence encroaches 42’ into the average lakeshore setback. The proposed residence is located further back on the property than the previous residence. However, it cannot be moved further back due to tiie location of the sewer and a sewer easement. Planning Commission should review whether there are any potential view impacts to the northerly adjacent neighbor. Statement of Hardship: The applicant has included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Engineer ’s Comments: The City Engineer has reviewed the plans. The comments are attached as Exhibit G. The applicant has reviewed the comments and agrees with the five items indicated in the letter. Vacation of the sewer easement may require a separate application process depending on how the original easement was worded. Issues for Consideration: 1. The proposed residence is set further from the lake than the old residence. 2. This lot and the adjacent lots are heavily wooded. 3. The proposed residence will not obscure neighboring properties views. 4. The proposed residence meets hardcover, lot coverage by structures and height requirements, 5. A route map shall be provided to the city prior to the start of construction showing which county/city streets are to be used for hauling fill. ^02-2853 Aulik Design Group 955 Tonkawa Road 11/15/2002 Page 2 of 3 ____________ ■ r 6. The sewer line prohibits the proposed residence from being located further back on the property (towards the road). \ 7. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance and conditional use permit for land alteration to construct a new residence on the property with the following conditions: 1. The applicants must obtain a land alteration permit from the city prior to hauling fill to the site. 2. The applicants must contact Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for an erosion control permit. 3. Erosion control measures shall be taken by installing a silt fence around the construction area upon receiving permit from City and MCWD and prior to any land alteration activit>. 4. A route map shall be provided to ihe city prior to the start of construction showing which county/city streets are to be used. 5. The applicant shall televise the sewer between the north and south lot lines prior to grading activity and again after the project is complete. 6. Applicant shall provide City with new easement for existing sewer and shall take appropriate action to vacate the existing unused easement. (Applicant should provide City with a certified copy of existing easement to allow staff to verify what type of vacation process is required). #02-2833 Aulik Design Group 955 Tonkawa Road 11/15/2002 Page 3 of 3 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area: LR-IB Lot Area Required 43,560 s.f. (1 acres) Actual 147,935 s.f. (3.4 acres) Hardcover Calculations: Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0-75 ’14,700 s.f.0 s.f (0%)240 s.f (1.63%) 75-250 ’34,825 s.f 8,706.25 s.f (25%)8,013.25 s.f (23%) 250-500 ’54,250 s.f 16,275 s.f (30%)1,760 s.f (3.24%) 500-1000’44,000 s.f 15,400 s.f (35%)2,000 s.f (4.5%) **At the time this report was written the only hardcover numbers provided by the applicant were for the 75-250’ setback zone. The other setback zones were estimated and will be verified by the applicant. As shown above, hardcover is not a concern in any of the setback zones. * I 3 Application ff Date ReceH’ed Amount Paid CITY or ORONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address [2^Act^ Type of Application to be Filed UA»tto ~ 4 I^ILUikL^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) «• ____ APPLICANT Phone (home ) tSCfO Phone (work)________________ Address lauJT^City <rf.ljnui^ PAgjC OVVNi. ;(if different than applicant) Phone ftome y}S2 ■*44*3 City _________Zip ft Date PropertyAcquired ________ 1 (do) ^ no^ also own the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - _____$ 75.00 For each variance request with CUP application _____$175.00 Residential Accessory Use _____$250.00 Institutional (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Guest Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit/Bldg _____$325.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $250.00 Land Alteration ____Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain )C Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more ____ Grading, seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PI D - see Fee Schedule $150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) After-the-Fact Fee - Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS _____ 5275.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) _____$300.00 Vacation _____$200.00 Easement Vacation _____$100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision _____$350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) ____ $375.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment _____$100.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule \ . C.JL' fit*. - ^ H 3 s * X • « r*. - i Sep-20-2002 00:3Ua Ffoa-CITY Of ORONO 4S522494SIE T-084 P.007/015 F-I7I 5 CITY OF QRONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional vaiiaoce) , • Renewal Vantoee Fee • $150:00 (no ■ change' firdm ongiiial application) Variance for non-confonning structures' $250.00 Afler-the-Faot Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION _ _ , „ , She Address__________ mfMJl ¥A. Application/!>_ 03L. - 3^75^3 Dale Received ' Amount Paid Property Identification Number (P.U>.), Attach legal description lb applic^on if not included on required survey. Acquired ^ | H 0Z>Date Pro I (do) 'ropettyA (^iaop' t useofp also own the adjacent parcels of Iwd. ■ Present useoF property':^ /vreadcnfial ___^o4er (specify) ^_________________' .(month/year) Zoning District- APPLICANT Name AuUH Address: U Phone (home). V ____^ (work) City: i^U/S Ra/'li Zip: SSTO OWNER 'Name__ Address:' IfeDO (if different than applicanp^^^f^t*^^KUS6 JUaV FioveitAm 'Pn'tig. Citjr. Phone (home) ^52“ ____ Phone (work)_________________ City. Clid^to_______z»pU5S3t^ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: ___ Estimated Constru^on Cost $ DOO (attach additional sheets if necessary) V4UUANCES required Lot Area ___Lot Width ___Hardcover Lot Coverage yC Setback:Front Side R-car ^ Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSmP/DESaUPnON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or'unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:____________________________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) o d3 6 City of Orono - General Land Use Application Description of Request: The request is being made to bring in over 501 cu. yd. of fill to 955 Tonkawa Road. Since this is a steep site, it is needed to create a level area in which to locate the house, provide good drainage and create access to the site for motor vehicles Due to the current zoning ordinances, the proposed house can not be located on the level area where the previous house was located where the lot is more level. A sewer easement prevents the proposed house from being located behind the average distance from the shoreline of the existing houses on adjacent properties (Orono Zoning Ordinance Sec. 10.22B). If the house were located closer to that line, it would req .’ire even more fill than what is proposed. The existing house shown on the survey has been removed. The current sKe is a vacant lot •• mJ i L a •i i Exi5i«'^9r [\oiO dlcNoli^*^ /#^AM 9 •t(«« •it • LEGEND ' - »««io * = = =:= c««fu . : Oatfl« . laAii — ■ »*tCO — — — - ca«tfi *9 m CU4*0* -lit- V-./ czr> <C=p CTD CEiD m3r-.-- !....• •CD o CZD o t * o A I tn • ■*u«: VAfil tiet«*« MI&C4 MC8 CUitIB IMiV • •Ht • SIN*' 0>8|«' 1*11 Ittl I »ul « • l-ci (•tC HHi •wliP •uliO «t*w€ cc»c« i»|r^ •iCIll ticsi IBM rail S'Bf I wnii ••li* tBlia C«0l^ &a<X- 1>M* i•li< 0€»» MU HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House __________ X C7S^2SdD 250-500'500-1000' Lenglh Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patfo/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic O. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Lenfth 3^ X X X Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic ft j£±. X X X X X X X X X X % i.^^^er TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE X 100 t2- ■* ,*S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. CO ( c\? iS S.F. A S.F. B S.F. (b S.F. (t> 2.1 ^.<5 S.F. (t> S.F. (g) 76 S.F. (g) M S.F. (D S.F. S.F. S.F. ^ M.S.F.^ S.F<g) S.F. \X \r^ -ASSiXS- S.F. a'^'j 013 cX3 X 100 S.F. B * 1 hardcover SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCT EOi^) y;yTCTTMG HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______• • * CULATION WORKSHEET 75-250’ 250-500’ iJtnit Width X X X ;*rV;*'* • B. -Oense ’ • • • 6. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Iindscape Uaderialn By Plastic Or Fabric ••••* • G. Other X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A • _ _ _ _ _. B , proposed hardcover in zone A. House Le:s;^ B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk • •• • E. Patlo/Dcck F; Liiadscape Uaderliln By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X» X X X X X O. Other • /• • • • xlOO Widdi TOTAL HABDCOVER IN ZONE ' TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE * A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + B-XlOO - 500-1000' S.F. • S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _S.F. _S.F. _S.F. _S.F. _ S.F. ■ • S.F. rMO S.F. S.F.^40i^noQ s:<B. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.Y. S.F. S.F. ;s.F. S.P. "S.F. S.F. "S.F. S.F. ■"S.F. ■"S.F. _ _ _ _S.F. S.F. • • • w * • • • • t hardcover calculation WORKSmEX SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ 75-250’ VESTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______■ * Lbo|1i X X X B. ’Oe«se * • C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landsc^e Uadeilaln By Plastic Or Fabric •*. •* •. • .? X X X X X X X G, Other TOTAL HARDCOVER ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ■ _____________ B . pi^pPQSEP HARDCOVER IN ZONE ’ A. House _____________ ^ Ixzt^ B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Parto/Dcck F. Ixiidacape Uaderlaln By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X X X X X Wid:h *• •m • xioo .V/idih 500-1000' f'7lr-n O. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE total property area in zone • A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ® . /TkO xlOO S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. >.F. S.F. S.F. SJr. S.F. "S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % S.F. S.F. S.F. ^S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _S.F. • ? • ••HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* 75-250* 250-500’500-1000 rviffnNG HARDCOVER IN ZOtNE A. House ______• . X S.F. VtnitL Wldih X X X S.F, S.F. S.F. • • .. B. •Garase* '■ ; . C. Driveway •*. «•• • • • • -• '• X • m S.F. •• •• •• •• • •• - . • ••• * »• X X S.F. S.F. D. Sidewalk X X S.F. S.F. E. Patio/Deck S.F. S.F. F. Landseisie Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X SJr. S.F. • S.F. O. Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A • • ■ ________ . B . S.F. xlOO S.F. f. proposed hardcover in ZONE A. House _____________ X S.F. Le:|:h VTtdch X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. B. Garage C. Driveway S.F. X X S.F. S.F. D. Sidewalk X X S.F. S.F. E. Patlo/DeoX X X S.F. S.F. F; Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ' A _____________ + B. JiCCO XlOO aO-. CO Cl S.F S.F r Nov 08 2C02 lOiSOflM BONESTROO ROSENE RNDERLIK 6516361311 P* I ^ J Bones troo ■ Rosene mr ■ Anderlfk & ^ \ Associates jEngineors 6 Architects November 8. 2002 Wendy Bottenberg Zoning Administralor/Plonner City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crysul Bay. MN 55323 Re; 955 Tonkawa Road File No. 139-02-000 Plat No. 02-2853 ■ ••>«««. AMr>M M AtlMLMVI. IMC. It Ml ArtWmMI.* A<H m«/(««M Op»*>lwA<lr ^•ru 9««t Otto O •c'^tftt'ec • %»«#«.#* t Pf • c**e«vs • coi Jf^tp A a>.*'OOA pf tCMM CMIIaMMIIt' M toiMW Pt . lai»pA c An^k* Pf • ••IKMH C AttaftM* riMKi^tii ■r'in A Co'don M • teOMi ■ ritlftf** fC • a.cnwa W »gur« a( -•r •cIM'I O lOS^kClU. P$ U.t*- u c aA ai. • o*>>4 o at • Pi . I 0*.-a A •srwtt'OO MS A . verr/ r W«uawio « Af. i J . Agr«t M VtA •A«Mia<< PI . fNo^Ai « a m*«ki at . Mi*, a n . t Pr,*^ o,.,. ■ pt . o»v*. j at ••"■a*. at • a at . w-njcn j miwimi • Ua.* A C'lxt at . la«A«at A aawM^af • aoo«ar* PI Ollicai li a»va ti C iomI aoc»«iir' ard A MN . WbtJI* AavAbonrUroocsm M>«AAa« \an . CAtA«« A Dear Wendy: We have reviewed the cenificaie of survey and proposed grading plan for the prupcity locaicd at 935 Tonkawa Road. The proposed work includes grading and construction of anew home. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters: • Drainage and utility easements should be provided 5-feet wide along the north and south lot lines and lO-fcci wide along the Tonkawa Road frontage. • There is an existing sanitary sewer located east of the proposed home. The sewer is outside of the sanitary sewer casement shown. The existing sewer easement should be vacated and a new easement 20-fcct wide centered over the existing sewer should be provided • The proposed grading will place approximately 5-feci of fill over tlic existing sanit.vy sewer The sanitary sewer record plans show the sewer as 9-inch PVC. The additional fill could impact the existing sanitary sewer As a condition of plan approval the applicant should Irtevisc the sewer between the north and south lot lines prior to any grading activity and again afier the project is complete The applicant should provide a financial guarantee to the City sufficient to cover any repairs that may be necessary to the sanitary sewer. • Heavy duty sill fence with wire fence backing and steel i-posis should be installed b.-twccn the I’t c and the home and along the south lot line to prevent any sedimentsirom being transported to the lake or neighboring property The silt fence should be inspected and approved by the City prior to any construction or site grading. • Grading along the south lot line should be revised to direct runoff towards ihe lake and away from the adjacent property to the south. It may be necessary to construct a retaining wall along the south lot Lne to direct flows into the proposed swale and towards the lake If you ha%c any questions please call me at (651) 604--JS63 ''r>ufs very iruU. BONkSTROO.' ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCUTES, INC. Tom Kelloeeloee Cc Greg Cappa City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 I *02-2854 1973 Fa|{rrnr\t Potnl Road Novrmbrr 16. 2002 Pagr 2 3 The niosl recent (2002) sur^ c>^ includes property located on the cast side of Fagemess Point Road, which consists of “accretions” i e. land that has been created since Fagemess was platted in 1886. Manley is intending to claim the areas sut^ eyed cast of the road \ ia a land title registration (torrens) process. It is staffs understanding that the neighbors to the immediate north w ill be disputing this claim. Therefore, the actual area Manley ow ns w ithin the cast 0-75 ’ lakcshorc yard is at this time unknown. Concrete stairsvay alongside garage is constructed within road nght-of-way. may be hazardous for road maintenance, other options may e.xist... Deck (approx. 5\ 10) constnicted on w est side ofhousc w iihout zoning approval, constituting 0-75* strueture encroachment and cxcessise hardcover. Deck was not shown on any plans or surveys used in approval of prior /onmg applications Deck was not show non any survevs or plans u.scd to obtain the remodeling pemht in September 2000 Deck first appeared ori a plan used to obtain a permit for basement remodel and deck over garage in February 2002, however, the deck was not part of that plan review and the fact that it appeared on the plan is inconsequential. Staff maintains that tliis deck c.xists illegally and should be removed. Staffcan confinn that a loo s.f deck e.xisted in the past (sec Exhibit J. assessors records) but it was completely removed sometime prior to or during the remodeling process, and construction of the new ileck has never been addressed. An alternative would be to require that an afier-the-fact v.iriance be applied for. PC nuy wish to provide applicant with direction on this matter. The deck constitutes additional hardcover and lot coverage above the previously approved amounts This deck is not the subject of the current application, and given the May 2002 hardcover and lot coverage denials for this property, it would seem to be unlikely this w ould be approv ed Ciradc of the walkout level ir the westerly 0-75* zone has been lowered by .ipproximately 2*. in V iol.ition of denials m 1998 This grading work was not covered bv any pennits isued to date and has iiev er been approved as pan of any pnor zoning application This grading vv as apparenti) done to create a better walkout situation. Old and new topographic survevs as well as old photos of this side of the house clearly show that the entire west lakeshore vard has been excav ated and the west facade of the house has been opened up to a much broader w idth and height than the onginal house This activity Dies in the face of long-standing Citv policies .ind ordinances which prohibit 0-75* land alteration to create a walkout situation* The grading activity to date on the w est side of the house has Icfi almost no vegetation intact and 90*^0 of the lakcshorc \-ard in a state of bare unprotected soil. Staff and MCWD have required that hay bales and silt fence be in place during the past few morihs until proper plans were submitted and .approved «02-28-4 1973 Fagi-rncsi Point Road November 16, 2002 Page 3 I- 7, Undcrciitling of the lakcshorc bank due lo high water wave action is lo some extent a separate issue from the work that has been done in the lakeshore yard. The bank at the immediate shoreline is very sleep, approximately 60% slope (steeper than 2:1) with little vegetation to stabilize it. Without riprap and some method of shoring it up, this bank has a potential to erode and/or slump off in the foreseeable future. Review of Proposed Boulder Wall Landscaping Plan The current topographical survey and boulder wall plans were received on November 12, leaving staff and the City Engineer little opportunii y to react lo them. The City Engineer ’s initial comments are attached as Lxhibit L. While the proposed boulder wall design docs not include proposed contours, it does define proposed spot elevations at critical points. The boulders will add significant amounts of hardcover to the west 0-75* zone (39.5% per the submitted calculations) The Engineer has asked for a number of additional details lo clarify the plan. In general, the proposal appears to continue the applicants ’ apparent goal oferealing a wide yard that walks out from the new door elevation where a narrow, higher yard previously existed. Please review the pre- and post construction photos attached as Kxliibit F. The photos also show to some extent the degree of cicarcutting that has resulted from the grading work in the west 0-75’ yard. The staff sketch (cross section at survey line) attached as Exhibit II depicts the grade changes that have been made. Notwithstanding the obv ious need to protect the undercut shoreline from further erosion, the current plan has a number of aspects which require Planning Commission consideration so that the applicant can be directed as to how to proceed. Planning Commission should consider the following in reviewing the proposed boulder wall / landscaping plan: 1. Should the grades be returned to their pre-consiniction status as pan of the boulder wall project’? The impacts of this are that: a) A much narrower exposure of tlic west facade will result. b) /Vn outside below-grade landing and steps will be required lo cnter/exit the walkout door; a short retaining wall system within a few feet of the house may be necessary lo retain walkout window exposures (the new windows are much closer to the ground than the original windows) (see photos and staff sketches). Perhaps the windows should be replaced with windows that are not so low to the ground, and the grade brought back up against the house where it was originally. c) Maintenance of the restored sleep slopes may require special attention. 2. An option lo consider is allowing a narrow walkout corridor at an elevation that will drain to the lake, i.e. the width of a walking path. This would be similar to what existed prior lo the grading work, but 2-3' lower in elevation. It should be noted that the 1998 topographic surv ey does not refiect the walkway that is shown in the photos, nor docs it reflect the short retaining wall along the north side of the old walkout level. #02-2854 1973 Fagerness Point Road November 16.2002 Pages 5. Applicant should be advised lo work w ith the adjacent property ow ners in reaching a suitable conclusion in terms of ow-nership claims regarding the “accretions" cast of the road. 6. The survey should be revised to verify the encroachment of the concrete stairway into the City right-of-way. Could this stairway be angled toward the driveway to avoid this encroachment? 7. Because it is likely the necessary- work w ill not happen until next spring, applicant should be advised to maintain erosion controls on the site as necessary to avoid sedimentation to the lake or to the road. This means adding silt fence along the road and beefing up the silt fencing at the wcs ‘. shoreline. Note that as a remodeling project, no Certificate of Occupancy is required, so that occupancy is not a tool the City can use as an incentive to resolve the outstanding issues. I low ever, continuing w ork on this project has become disruptive to the neighborhood, and needs to come to a timely closure. Application U O ^ Date Received 2, Amount Paid QQ CITY OFT)RONO - GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address T^bCK rf Type of Application to be Filed Ol)P Q--~) S U-e ro.'j • (rx^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) _ APPLICANT Name ‘^xAe.Oo A. Address \<9,A*b AviC >J OWNER (if different Ilian applicant) Name V^.m ___ L ^ -Phone (home) ______ Phone (\vork)_ City n/AUC/|^V '7L^ S44- 2ip SS^Z.7 Phone (home)_ Phone (work)_ Address City Date Propertv- Acquired________________________ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - (month'vear) K S 75.00 For each variance request wih CUP application _____$175.00 Residential Accessor)' Use _____$250.00 Institutic .*• (church, school, etc.) _____$225.00 Guest House/Gucst Apartments _____$200.00 Duplex Credit^ldg _____$325.00 Commercial/Industrial Use ^ $250.00 Land Alteration ____ Grading and filling - designated wetland or floodplain Grading and filling - 501 cu. yd. or more Grading, seawall, retaining walls \sithin 75’ of lakeshore _____ PRD/PID - see Fee Schedule _____$150.00 Renewal Fee (no change from original application) _____After-the*Fact Fee • Double Current Application Fee OTHER APPLICATIONS $275.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $300.00 Vacation $200.00 Easement Vacation $100.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision $350.00 Rezoning (PUD - refer to fee schedule) $375.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment SI00.00 Appeals Other - see Fee Schedule required submittals ___ Completed Application Fonn. 2. _____ Describe request in detail. ------- Certified Property OwTicrs List of outers uithin 350*. labels and plat matf f>ou must obton this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance ^-603, Government Center, 348-3271). * ------- SbrmaUon^*^ Sur\ey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for surve>* ---- Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ----Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land altcraUons involve changes in elevation (grades). ---- List of the legal names luxludc marital status) of all persons uith an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current ou-ncr(s). ---- Construction plan, if applicable (sec staff for requirements). ------- As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUiMEMS OR COPY SUB\ll^TEi?*^y^fT^‘^ll^ S.MALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS submitted )^ of all documents, plans, etc. to be The Applicant and Proper.y OvsTier must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Cenification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete, dmtials of Clencal Staff: 5. 6. 8. 9. Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE Applicant's signature Date 2 oeS-T~ ^ OWNER S SIGN.VrURE -O this application and funhe, authorized reasonable f ^ property by City staff, consultants, asenis. comm.ssion members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature_____Date Applicant must have alt subminats into the Cit> offices 25 di\> before the Pimnin. r • • tt .• PUnnini Commission Mmtinjs >te held on the Ihiri Monday oUach scheduled review meelinjs of the Planninj Commission Jid Council If ,n T“ 'Hi*'/ scheduled meeting, pleue male «rangemeou to base an » “tie » ««nd a Building & Zoning OIKce of this change prior to the meeting ” “ If/-. ^ ; - J r* W '1,^ % ^OoZ. -wp'-c-nf-p'^'f \ \ B % ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. IU> Su im MmncumVj. MS "U« PiKifW l•^'^-«'-5I jx 4T4 x>-' siKvtvHm A'£I7A^ |£ JA^ET MA\L^ SLR\TYll» S»%^-n>*vf Wrf* " LltiALOLSt RII’IIOS ---------------------- Lot 7, Kjircnicxx. HairK-pm I ouniy, Mitiocviu. jnd the Jiitcu.iiix to vnU L>: Ivm,.’ Kiwcvn ilw cxtcnxHMix MHit>vjxtcfl> lothcxInKCof Ljikx MimtcuinkjoU wn.'rtiK.i.tkilv oiui Mutlmc'.UfU lmc«ol vimI lot and MiutiK-jxtaty «>f tx’ *outhca>«ctl* line of Lndcf iK- Loukn Axenifc a» dedu atv-d in viid pU. xlMch MHjtlK-axteilv line i» 40 feet wiutbcaacrlv a» meaxured jt rifltt anyU-x lioni Uw xuuilwjxteiix luw of xau) krt LIMITAllHNSfk sons 1 SlMminj,* Ihv’ Icnvrlh arid direetiun of bowndafx lincx of Ih* l.’pal d.-x<fi(i»»in you fumixhcd 2 Shtminf U k loxatHwi of exixtinp unptuxeincntx »e deemed iwporant 3 Seniny nex momimcnix w xenlyinp old monument* to mark the eomerx of the pfiivny 4 Uhiie xe *hox* ptopoxed iinpioxcnH:ntx to your ptopettx «»e are not ax familiar »itli your planx a* you arv nor are we ax familiar xitii Uw re«|uitetnenix of inixenutx'mal apcneiex a* ihcir etnplovccx are 3ke xup|rc*i that xini fe*K** tlx- xurve* to nmfirm that the ptotMixal'. ail «tui you intend and xubittit the xiirvex i«> xoih yoxemmenial av'tneiex ax max hjxc puixilietHin oxer your pio|eet to |iain then appioxalx if you ean SIAM)\KUS> MHUI S A ( tfSVLMIOSS •" Uemwex I ?' ID pijv with plaxiie phiy Ix-anni; Suw Ixeiix^- Suir.lv- •*: >' xci unle. otheruxiv; noted I Itcrehy certify llui tliix plan xpcvilicaiinti lejsirt oi xutxey wax prepared h> nie t« und.T inx ilirexi xupx:»xixum and llul I ant a licenxed I'lolexxioiial I n^inevr and 1‘iote-xMoiul Surxexot under the laxx ol the- Suie »•! Mimiex,iu .Q Hrtt\SL6 ■ _________________ (am^ I'aiker 1*1 APS No «7:J5 GRAf’HlC SCALE ( Di nrr i TUP A7T or ratr anKA.vr £LnATiaS*9M4S DWG. NO. 0£r0505. «/) cn %f -V'1 u> V\J c. ^ iDVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO, SOOS.Hwy.No. 101 Mbncioalu. MN 3S34S Pbooc (932) 474 7964 Fix (952) 474 S267 URVBYFoiL KEVIN & JANET MANLEY URVBYED; Miy.2002 DRATim Miy22.20O2 £V1SED: JuDC 4,2002 to odd propotM rcuiaiag (by oihen) EOALDESCIUPTTON; o( 7, Ficnncsi. Hoaepb County, MinncsoU, and the iccrctiou to uid lot lying betwoen the xtcaiioai toutbeasteriy to the ibore of Lake Minnetonka of the ooftbeastcriy and toutbwattriy lines of lid lot aed aotttbcattcriy of the sonibeastcrty line of Under toe Linden Avtoae. as dndicatod in said play, dtkkaoutooaitedy line is 40 feet southeasterly, as Bcasured at right angles, ftwn toe aotahcMtortylloe fsaldloi (MrTATlONS A NOTES Showing the length sod direction of boundary lines of the legal detcriptioo you imished. . Showing the location of existing intfrovenicnts we deemed important. . Settiag new ponuments or vending old monuments to mark toe cotners of the npcfty. . Whfle we show proposed improvements to your property, we arc not u familiar with our plans u you are nor arc we u familiar with the requiremenu of govcmmenial gendea u their employees are. We suggest that you review toe survey to conllnn that the lopoaala are what you intend and submit toe survey to such govcnimeoul agencies as may ave jtttisdictioo over your project to gain their appirovsJs if you caiL TANDARD SYMBOLS A CONVENTIONS •* Denotes 1/2* ID pipe with plastk plug bearing Stata License Number 92J3. set, unleu ‘toctwisa noted. hereby certify that this pLa, specincation, itport or survey was prepared by me or Oder my direct supervistoo and that I am a licensed Profeuiooal F«r>w«^ and lofiasiooal Sturcyor under the laws of the Slate of Minnesota. ^ T\m\OA unt IH. Parker P.E A P.S. No 9235 GRAPHIC SCALE ( tN nxr) UUi,Ll 'jjer rvF Nvr or rmr rmnuyT SUTAmWMfSXM JtO.Q.K.A £fVG. NO. OOOSOt W(%m 6 co 03 > <D : LU *2mo Rstev MT3 Fogprnec N-B4 ]/lft/^ fjtof^ y'A/iO) Ipk YiiiirfiftMiifari I' .. •> . ■ .‘■•* :. i'- ‘ yV .y ■' '^ ■'' '^- '> ••‘.V * < r •■--I W.iLt-'r^:»vv«- V. ■' V- .-.v. .-. ■• < i-.- . , •j K- > ;^- '' ‘ *^ . \ )0 ■ -• I • •1 ‘ i •‘I ' rsioFnm WBT%i2«*M «.7«C 44*1 ^ryv MAN ru^ rjw 1/4' - t~tr I I - r.Al<» W 'A ["' " ] • ffW ftAi [ I - tLT. *•» fi.» * •AMUM UX KJf*t3 UX\> »V HV A L>’LF/L ikc- V. rcr n mi m ni uruxft'-ti fPr (T t7Ttij»o to \\yry nto- cW’viTt'i alfcftix. a owi <«;»i to Ht. cr 0ci * » iMf''. Ki/^ ' i.»A/< i*f f *\yu:rtf, ir n i>» *;n<i*«-in (» ffTtW UAr ft ‘•/•tif.f* . r»^i V»!f./rr •tfi ^.Kr. it i.v!Uli.!i.ri ft. :».*i J ni '!,*• *«WI ffA f* ^iir cffxv^ Ai. tvi:v»'A»r> uA>Tkt/5 tie, ir urv»ir*-. t-fiATM' ra ni u:f* ^ i u»f ‘tVii:.tie*i ',• b Ai tMifc«i.»<o I nr»o too cv u,vwi] rnf>ttlf itA»5TSU,l k.At uva f ffti' itr^JTP pt nr c<.»<»va At> V Tft •irt*^».-KA.T.»-' (%kM to i»- H.> n.*r. t>i '»1A; A*’ Al> ft ‘ariit i»4 in *#v»' ofA'f'Tn ’ r T»t I UXVtJt r^'‘ MAX cL^t fK’Olt III Nxn*i'<. cr r>r n'T»f Miff. HV t>l‘X AT'IM’lt ffif nv»f i»*v^ fttitf H'-tf*’.' Ar If.' ». a*#’i:A-w r'r a:t>i (ixt? «<•». fVA Vtv r»l U».*HAW *»VM T/rr rjTXA*-;fApY f^Loxro»r> ftti-ff t'fiff TOAX'l**! Al Iff. c^r.'KC^O*, fXI’ It MWi Af^IZ A-lM A r« T>f. »V|*ri- 4«ri»4 (T r>-. iViJXf d r»t u*ity\-tcf uvii UP nr Ai.itTUT/t'tAitP M.tlVtlT cr AfT l^-Cfia'A. ffTf.t!N u*rri>ix,iHU ttl< IcPyTL ffli* u*iir,rf6 t (*•> tLP. tJ«ro NTw \ /7f^ n /yy n >n 1/4* - f-<r T WM DATE *S/ia/02 •ATCM S02 r#OF ADM OWNER NAHE TAXfAYER NAtU/AOOR EROR AOOR OWNER NAtflE TARfAVER NAHE/AOOR M J8-117-2S lA OMA f*CCRHESS fOlMT RO JOW K PUROY CTAL JOHN K PVRDY ARTS FA6ERNESS PT RO WAYZATA IW SSSRl SR 18-117-2S 14 RMR 0 L EKLOF A C F LEE CARY EKLOF / CATHY LEE IRAS FACERHESS FT RO WAYZATA hM S5ST1 MEHNEFIM CWJNJV WOPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEff PROPERTY OWNERS LIST SR 1R-117-2S 14 eo«7 POINT ROW L DELAY ALA DELAY •• • LORI A OaAY 1R71 FACERHESS POINT RO WAYZATA IM SSSRI SR lR-117-25 14 OeiO •1R55 FACERHESS POINT RD 2.5 ‘ cenpler‘ karlton cehpler1R55 FACERHESS POINT RO / WAYZATA HN S53T1 ^ REPORT NO. PI43S401 PACE 5 SR 18-117-25 14 ORM •IR7S FACERHESS POINT RO "Rnley brothers CONST^ HANLEY BROTHERS CONST INC AAA LEKIE CT EACAH NN S512J total batch 502 Boots % SJ \ representation of INFORHATION ^riT ApJfAM ^RUE OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTHEHT*Dr*PDni?5»!”i® RECORDSOF NY KNOWLEDCE AND BELIEF^ PROPERTY TAKATION, TO THE BEST DATE -3’ n-aZ.»yt . .PW int D Hardcover: 4753 Tonkavicw Court The property lies within 250-500* of Lake Minnetonka. Proposed Lot size: 25,264.8 s.f. (approx. 18,250 cxcl. Norlli Shore Drive R-O-W) Allowed HC: 5,475 s.f. (30%) Proposed Hardcover: 2,417.22 s.f (13.2%) 4765 Tonkavicw Lane The property lies in two setback zones. Proposed Lot size: 39,639.6 s.f 250-500 ’: 1,500.6 s.f - No Hardcover in area 500-1000*: 38,139 s.f Allowed HC: 1 1,441 s.f (35 “i) Proposed Hardcover: 3,108.65 s.f (8.15%) Hardcover is not an issue for cither propcrt>’. Status of Tonkavie\> Court: Tonkavicw Court is a privately maintained shared road driveway within dedicated City right-of- way's. The 5 or 6 owners who gain access from this road share in the maintenance costs. In 2001 at the request of the residents and the Police Department the City revised addresses (some of w hich were on North Shore Drive with no access from that side) and formally renamed the private road as Tonkavicw Court to make it easier for visitors and emergency services to find the properties Sewer Review: Both properties are sew ered. Tlie sew er lines are not aflected by the proposed lot line rearrangement. Survey Inconsistency to be Rectified The survey provided by the applicants docs not correctly identify the portions of right-of-w ay that were vacated in 1985 (See Exhibit H). The southeast comer of the Affcldt property was not vacated, and cannot be part of this rearrangement. A revised version of the surxey and revised legal desenptions will be required prior to Council action. *02-2852 Koopman'Affetdt TonJumcH- CourtTonkavie*^- lutnr S'oirmh^r 18.2002 Page 3 of 4 B PROPOSED LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR TROY & JENNIFER KOOPMAN. AND DWIGHT & PATRICIA AFFElDT BLOCKS 2 & 3. BERGQUIST AND V.'ICKLUND'S PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA EXlSTlNQ If OAl CCSCRlPIKJfW ''w. I 11 IMI »• tomtf el lot • to If* mo* ll^e. > TO&Et.<R -«< t?* 5<./-^1..-t, IS l»»t dove, from C conver 01 »»d Id • •• A'A^'t*ldv«* Me>w»**i LdO 2 Bor^ I AWJd.01 P.r». CO »An« , lecvyoto ptd nvered, Hennepm Courfj I 6 0C1 2 A VV<W«1. Pe^. Co oo Hctmw9*o^i d tMl Id I part tOBE TRANSEERRtDEROMA^'ttOT TOAOOPMAN .. te m. d i^Tro “I^Sro^XC-^' '• Ml l« • 0C5CR PT’0»rt AfTER TRASSEfO • CCPVA*, property Id » e ven ts ,«i llo/frvMHe'Vi ’, . "J .Ti: SoV!^•rt, , or «*l Ld ». M d 0;od S TCXi£TX.R *''T.^ Ai ers T^d pert d m, f*ortf.*.sort, Hdl d .ecdcd Pe^ A.«-u« putee /V »>• dd d Bergqved A WOWi PeA, dwcn u»b. d Id A B»c» 2 lAd BdWvrt dirt WVICJ^* Pert, inrtputM /V »>• dd d Bcgquid A VdOXintf l Pen. «n«v m .rtdWd. d 01. ScdT.edd^ In. d Id A BWO 2 teeS I •odfr.ed.rti d elr. rtrwfr d ng« dv<« to Ifr. Sodfr»w>»Tl dv d Ld T B:oa 2 from • perf* Ovdoon «.ded A4 « led nortfr-.«dtf e» Sodfr-.dd,|lr.tdUrtLdlAertrtT from tfr. »odfr«e*d^ com.* d »ed id A Af fUOT PROPERTY d terd d 01. #o«A»i.»ddty frn. d »e«nd • enuifr. W.d in. ' le-s Id 10 dcortfrng lo Oi. nconMrt pid Oi.»od. M«»ep« Cou.| Mrfw.»de ALSO 1 r.n Wbm . togdfrd btfr Old A enA 7 *odi 7 BdMdd A Wtcefrmrf* Pdt. Md«d" C/, Unn. eccomno lo in. A^ leoIIoST-fr Aid pArt d »• r»«i.**«i, fre* d ida««) Pert A-dnd BfS'SsSr.i.Tir-'------------- GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES. INC. cofcsuLTtAC CNCPCERS. uAf® su*vcY0»*s. snc PLA»#«RS 44S north ATLIOW ORftX. t0«; LAAt. **i 553M 612-473-4141 I KM A' Cl.’fi TKiT PI»H Sfttrr»TOH CP M»0.t ■ ts .M.MIO A’ K oe l»«. df CdrtCI HdnjrrtO* »»e T>«*T I *. e DU f IctMUO MiOiCSSOui ffrCWA MC l«K) sMrd leai M un * m sui a mcvsia //-/T rt2 te. lava lOMe _// VC At r-so* e.r| 10/29/02 «• >c 02 -A73 c-l 02-475 i^ua-asisa-' Rcc'd Itli/o'i- r/ A £;<ISr7AJ(:,f’leoPose'b O (V m W- 1 |ON|^ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.A'^// 1720 A RESOLUTION VACATING AN UNUSED PORTION OP PARK AVENUE WITHIN THE PLAT OF BERGQUIST AND WICKLUND'S PARK, SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 11, RANGE 23 IN CITY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, The City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on July 25, 1984, I.D. Caples and Virginia A. Caples filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of a portion of Park Avenue originally dedicated in the plat of Bcrgquist and Wicklund’s Park legally described as follows; That part of Park Avenue lying East of the West line of Lot 10, Block 3, and its Northerly extension, and lying Northwesterly of a line drawn from the most Southerly corner of Lot 9,said Block 3, Northeasterly through a point on the Northeasterly lino of said Lot 9 distant 15 feet Northwesterly from the Easterly corner of said Lot 9, all in **Bergquist 6 Wicklund's Park, Hennepin Co. Minn**; and WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held before the City Planning Commission on August 20, 1984, regarding said vacation and all persons interested were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested vacation and the Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation, as proposed, is in keeping with the public interest in consideration of the following findings: 1. The vacation does not affect access to or use of any adjoining property. 2. The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve or use the dedicated right-of-way as a .oad except for utilities and access purposes hereinafter described. 3. The unimproved dedicated right-of-way as it exists serves no public purpose. page 1 of 2 City of OROIVO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1720feiv ^RONO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of I.D. Caples and Virginia Caples is hereby granted and that the portion of Park Avenue legally described above is hereby vacated. The granting of the petition is subject to the following conditions : 1. Upon vacation, applicants must combine the vacated adjacent portion of Park Avenue with their property (Lot 10 and part of Lot 9, Block 3, Bergquist and Wicklund's Park). 2. Upon vacation, applicants shall quit-claim deed to the County the platted right-of-way over the traveled portions of County Road 19. 3. Applicants shall grant the utilities and drainage easements over the center 20 feet of Park Avenue right-of- way to be vacated. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held January 14, 1985. ATTEST; /XShrothy M.Hollan, City Clerk Mary C. Bui Mayor page 2 of 2