The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-22-2002 Planning Packetr Public A ttendance Meeting Date □ C ouncil O' Planning C ommission □ Park COMMISSION □ Other Please fillouttiie information reque -sted BE1X)W FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. PRESENT FOR (from asenda) NAME (please print) / ADORES n /T'/NAME OR NUMBER \y . / c?^c - Li 2. L/nJ< 7.. 8.. iMf *n ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, January 22.2002 6:30PM 2750 Kelley Parkway - Council Chamber! AGENDA Council Rcprcflcniative: Jay Nygard AUDIENCE MEMBERS: Please sign in for the public record at the front podium if you wish to address the Planning Commission. Applicants will be asked to move to the front table to answer questions when the Chair announces the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council If action b taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for the February’ II, 2002 City Council meeting unless otherwbe noted by the Chair. OLD BUSINESS I. MH-2699 Jay and KendaJI Nygard, 1386 Rest Point Road, Variances (StafT: Paul Weinberger) 2. #01-2730 Ace Pro|)crtics, 3375 Crystal Bay Road, Variances (StafT: Paul Weinberger) 3. #01-2731 Navarre Amaco, 3360 Shoreline Drive, Commercial Site Plan Review and Variances (Stall: Paul Weinberger) #01-2735 Proposed Zoning Code Amendment, Section 10.03 Subd. 14, Structural Lot Coverage Ordinance Standards (Stall: Wendy Bottenberg) 5. #2333 Proposed Zoning Code Amendment, Section 10 JO Subd, 4C, Home Occupation Standards (Staff: Mike Gaffron) NEW BUSINESS 6. #02-2737 Charles Pyle Jr., 3548 Ivy Place, AAcr-the-fact Variances (StafT: Wendy Bottenberg) #02-2738 G & G Holding Company Ltd. Partnership, 1170 Loma Linda Avenue, AAer-the-fact Variances (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) #02-2739 Thomas and Mary Ann Dahlquist, 4070 Dahl Road, Variances (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) lilliiL - ^ 9. #02-2740 Jef&y and Nancy Twidwell. 1S6S Concordia Street, Variances (StafT: Wendy Bottenberg) 10. #02-2741 Calvin Presbyterian Church. 177 Glendale Drive, Conditional Use Permit (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) 11. #02-2742 Douglas and Roban Smith, 4195 Higbwood Road, Variances (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) >2T#02-2744 Paul Johneox. 2940 Casco Point Road, Variances (Staff: Wendy Bottenberg) SKETCH PLAN 13. #02-2743 Thomas J. Dunsmorc, 2525/2S4S Shadywood Road and 2525 Kelly Avenue, Sketch Plan Review (Staff: Paul Weinberger) PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 14. Report of Planning Commission representatives attending Council meetings November 26,2001, December 10,2001. and January 14,2002. 15. Other issues for discussion. 16. Planning Commission approval of minutes for November 19.2001. 17. Selection of representatives for City Council meetings on January 28,2002 and February 11,2002. ADJOURNMENT 4300 ^ «400 OKOM) PLANMNC; C OMMISSION Turiday, January 22, 2002 ^:50PM 2750 Krilry I’arkwav - f ounril ChainlifT^ g 4000 Q''*35»”*g^B00 g City of Orono, Minnesota street Numbering Index Map •c ^ »*3 i»»t K, <»n •»»» ».*(• t «u JL-* te.mt AA« t. nti I.BM w<K •. n*! *»<« •t.itw ACn.NDA CoaiKil Krprmnlalivc; jay Nypard Al'llIFNCF. MI MilKKS: riratr «iKn in for Ihr public record at (hr fninl podium if you wiih to ad<lrr'.« Ih^ PlanninK Coromiuion. Applicants will be asked to mose to Ibe front table to eoswie questions when the C hair announces the application. The PiannioK Commission is an ads bory bmly to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this age^sda. they will be scheduled for the Febntao II. 2M2 City Council nscctinc nn>s\ otherwise noted by the Chair. OLD BrsiNi:ss 1 aOI 269V |J> aikl KtnJjII NytsarJ. I.1K6 llrsl Point Road, Vjri.inccs (Suit Paul \tciribcf|:c*l MapA-7 2 aOI-27.tO Acc Pfi'pcrlics. ,t.t75 fry*|j| Hay Hoad. V.maiKcs I Sul I Paul Wcinhervcrt .Map D-9 I hOI-2731 Sasarre Amaco. .1.160 Shoreline Drise, Commcreul .Site Plan Review and Varunccs (Suff. Paul Weinbetset) Map D-9 4 aO|-27.15 Profsived Zoning f itde Aincndmenl. Sccliun 10.0.1 Suhd. 14. Shuctural lail fuserage Ordinance Sundaids |SUIT WciuJy liotienbergi 5 02,1.1.1 PfiipuNCil /atning fih!c Ameudnicni. Section lOJO Sabd. 4C, Hume (Kcupatiun ManJardv (SutT Mike(ialfion) SF.W Ul SIMAS 6 002-27.17 Charles Pyle Jr, .1540 Ivy Place, Ancr-lhe-lacl Variances (Stall Wendy Hultenbcrgi Mapl>-ll 7 H02-27.10 (i Si (» Holding Company I iJ I'artncrsliip. 1170 l.oma Linda Asrnur. Alter-llie-lacl VariaiKcslSuil Wendy lloilenhergl .MapC-6 0 a02-27.1*t Ihomas and M.iry Ann Ij.ihlqiii'1.4070 DabI Kwad. VariatH.'cv (StaM Mend) llottenbergi Map ll.6 9, 002-2740 icIIr> and Nancy I widwcll. 1005 Cuiicurdia Street, V'aiiances (Stall Wends iioitcnbcrg) MapC-O 10. 002-2741 Calvin Pievbytenan Church. |77 Glendale Drise. Cunditional Use Permit (Sun Wendy (ioitcnherg) .MapG-3 11.002-2742 Douglas and Kuban Smith. 4195 llighwood Road, Variances (Staff W end) Dottenberg) .Map 11-7 12 002-2744 Paul johneos, 2940 Cascu Puini Kuad, Variances (SufT Wendy Bottenberg) Map C-11 SKETCH PI.A.N 13 *02-2743 Ihorrusi Dunsmorc. 252S 2545 Shady wood Road and 2S25 Kelly Avenur, Sketch Plan Review (Staff Paul Wein^rgerj PLANNING t O.MMISSIO.N CO.M.ME.NTS 14. Report «fpl.inning Commission representatives attending CoutKil meetings Novemher 26. 200», December 10. 2001. and January 14. 2002 15. Other issues for discussion. 16. Planning Commission .spprov.il of mimiles for November |9. 2001 II C..|.,rlinn nf « f.,» r'ii. r',u)lv<l rm InOMvrv ’’OnS .,^,1 Applicatloa Complete: 11/12/01 ApplkatioD Deadline: 3/11/02 TO: Chair Ha»n and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Mcxjrse. City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger. Zoning Administraior/PIanncr DATE: January 2,2002 SUBJECT: «01 -2699 Jay and Kendall Ny gard 1386 Rest Point Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning Dbirici: Lot Area: List of Exhibits: LR-iU One hamiiy Lakeshorc Kcsidenlial District (i acre) A Application B Plat Map C SitcSurscy D I Inidcovcr Calculation Worksheets E Elevation Views F Floor Plans G Pitiperty Owner Notification List Application: Applicants have requested variances to permit a 207 s.f.. two story addition for an entry way and second floor living space. The addition is proposed to be 8’ from the east property line encroaching 2’ into the I O' required side yard setback. The 2' variance is requested to allow the proposed addition to match the c.xisting exterior wall on the house. Currently, the house is located 8' from the property line. A second \ariance is requested to permit additional hardcover in the 75-250* lakcshore setback. Proposed is to increase the total hardcover in the 75-250’ setback by 120 s f The addition would be partially located over an existing concrete walk, stoop and rock garden. (UI-2699 J«> «ml KcrulJll N>|Vil |J>6 Retl Pwni R0*1 ImMf) 22. 2UU2 rage I ofJ Pertinent Code Sections: Section 10.24. Subdivision 5 (B): Yard requirements 10’ side yard setback. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56. Subdivision 16 (1.) (2): Allowed Hardcover. Lot Area 75-250’ setback = 5.384 s.f. Existing Hardcover * 2,822 s.f. (52.4%) Proposed Hardcover = 2,942 s.f (54.6%) Review of Hardcover: The hardcover numbers noted above do not reflect the amount of non-conforming landscaping plastic on the property, which is a change from the percentages as noted on the hardcover calculation worksheets. Also, note the two rock gardens located in the 75-250' setback aic only considered 5U*o hardcover based on the rock gardens are not impervious as the rocks arc located over natural suiface. Rather than calculate the individual area of each rock the 50’!'o figure was used to average the total hard surface over each garden. Issues for Discussion: 1. The property w as developed prior to current zoning standards. The house is cuirentl> located as close as 7’ from the property line and gradually moves further from the property line as the house gets further from the lake. The point where the new addition would join the existing house is 8 ‘ from the property line. The overhang from the house would be located approximately 5’ from the property line, where an overhang cannot be located closer than 8.5' to a property line. 2. The addition increases overall hardcover on the property, however the total lot coverage b\ stricture would be below the I5®b allow ed by Code. Does the size of the house, relalis e to the size of the lot. allow for certain hardcover alterations over 25% to permit the properly to maximize overall structure (14 6®b)7 3. The addition will create 120 s.f more hardcover on the property than preexisting conditions. Should an equal amount of hardcover be removed to compensate for the additional hardcover? Proposed lot coverage by structures is as follows: House 1.418 s.f Shed 85 s.f Total 1,503 s.f/ 10,282 “14.6% ■0I-7MN lt> and Kcndjll N)prd t )I6 Rnl fVxni Ro*i 2:. 2002 ri«(2orj 4. Applicant has stated the hardship is the house was built prior to the adoption of current zoning standards. PlaBBiaf CommlMion Oolioai for Action A. Recommend approval of variance to permit the addition to be located 8 ’ from the side property line and to permit 2,942 s.f. (54.6%) hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback where 2.822 s.f. exists and 1.346 is allowed. A recommendation of approval shall include the following special conditions: 1. All landscaping plastic located on the property shall be removed prior to the final building inspection for the new addition. 2. Final drainage plan shall include approved drainage plan to allow stormwater to be channeled around the cast side of the house. 3. Gutters shall be installed If required to improve drainage from the roof line. B. Recommend denial, stating reasons. C. Table, provide direction to applicant on possible plan revisions. Staff Recommendation Alternative A. Staff recommendation finds the existing house wus constructed prior to adoption of current zoning standards. The new addition would not encroach closer than the existing house, and the total lot coverage by structures would not exceed 1 5% on the property. •01-2699 Jay and Krndill Nygjid I3S6 lUU Zd M Road Ihumo 22. 2002 rage 3 on Af cation # P! Date Received 7-t;t______ Amount Paid CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $22&r0(r^.^ (SSO.OO per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SI20.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures S220.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORAUTION Site Address .FOILNUTipN , ^Wit Qt Property Idcntificauon Number (P.I.D.) /OT- "■ //T- ' 25-3*^ ~ Cco(~ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Pro yrty ^quired ^6____________ I (do) id£^notX]5llso own ^ adjacent parcels of land. Present u&e of property: residential Zoning District:_____________________ _(monlh.'year) other (spccify)_ APPLICANT Name____ Address; Phone (home)_ Phone (work) OWNER (if different than apolicant) i Name__'i-aiOan) (T/T? City:. Address: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST City: Phone (home ) ^ ^ ^ Phone (work)_______________ Zip: Descri^ request in detail: I ^ Vntlncli flHrtil srr Constnjction Cost S POCJ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED ^ ____Lot Area ___Lot Width 7\Hardcover ^ Setback: __Front ___Other (specify)______________ Side __Rear ___Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical diflicultyy or unusual property conditions preventing conmliance with Zoning Code requ^ments: At/. It Tt)_________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) #2699 ^ Coun^ Taxp^ygilieiyjgejB;^ /f Parcal ID 07117233300M Horn Number 13M SCrMtNambilEtTlWIiailb. ‘ 77Xs nof« toffiOy fvcordM m^p. ft ivp<«s«nrs • compgabon of Momiotion a •nd dots /fom Oty, County, and State rood outhortbOM wifi othw hpur6A.^A^ m HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 929.4 CONTOUR LIC LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lot 5, Subdivision of Lot 14, Rest Point Pork LAKE MINNETONKA WEST ARM o : denotes iron marker Bearings shown ore based upon an ossumed dattm. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house and the location of all visible "hardcover" thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. ^ GRONBERG & iSSOCUTES, INC. ^ aBUKHiI&t«3MK9IUns 1 herdv certify that ttis arvey •« prepaid by me or uito my drecl visiorv 04 Ibol 1 on 0 <Uy registered Chrl Engineer ond Land So»eyor «Aler the kws of the Stole ol Mniesola r-20'4\DATE 10-3-01 N CCS T UKun^msoi W-473-4141 JOO NO. 01-379 01-379 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JAY NYGARD OF LOT 5. SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14, REST POINT PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA is . :.<!> 929.4 CONTOUR LWE LAKE MINNETONKA LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lot 5. Subdivision of Lot 14. Rest Point Pork WEST ARM o ; denotes ironmorker Bearings shown are based upon an ossimed datun. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above I Ka/4 rur r fw fhA i\r\ ^^ictina Ond SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ^inartNc hardcover in zone A. House ____________ UnfOi S^.ry. HARDCOVER CALCULABOiOVORKSUEET *^ini /C -S-o/ 0-75’ moiMv C75.250J 250-500'500-1000' r:xt5i B. Oarage C Driveway D. SidcNvallc E Paiio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain ByPlasde Or Fabric 0. Other I e 1.77 Len|0i TOTAL HARDCOVER [N ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA FN ZONE A_____________- B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House _____________ X B. Oarage C. Drivxwajr D. Sidewalk E. Palio/Deck V 100 Width F. Landscape Underiain By Ptasiic Or Fabric Q. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A J___________ * B I2H 3o\6i 53 8^ •>4.021 iHiSS 8 73 >: 100 ^ 3* V .S.F. -NO(;5g 9tAoeiVP 5 r. SF.-^'OCO'AOC [sF.-5RWA»m/A. SF. ;$f. itnac on Putt' SF.'iHcurpfS ‘SF. ’SF v«ne> wsstt c#f«eftrTr SF-5t5ff^ STPr*C SF A SF. B H SF.-UoOiC sm- .SF. 5P 0«'»f6 ‘VRl' !sf SF. [SF 'sf 5frwc J SF SF SF. Z7V2 3 .avOcLU SF. A SF. B ' V4 / o-^ d i • ! V ^ ^ f7o9/' ; ! o RtJN DATE tk/2k/ll •AfCH StB 5« •7-117-2S 52 ••57 rMf ADM 51575 KEST POINT RO OMNCR NAME H B t L R CERLICHER TARPAVER NlCNAEl • t LYNNE GCRllCNER NAME/AOON 1S7S REST POINT RO nOUNO HN 5SSAA NENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INTORNATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST S« •7-117-25 55 •••E •!%•• REST POINT Rf LILLIAN D WILLIAMS LILLIAN 0 WILLIAMS !«•• REST POINT RO NOUNO NN SS5M REPORT NO. PlNSSAtl PACE IS 5R RT-llT-ES 55 •••« •15YR REST POINT RO L R JOMtSON SCO JOHNSON LYLE R JOMtSON 2757 IHVINO AWE SO MPLS NN 55AI0 PROP AOOR OWNER NANC TAMPAYER NAME/AOOR 50 •7-117-25 55 •••S •1SY4 REST POINT RO PIN NALSN PATRICR J WALSH 15N0 REST POINT RO NOUNO HN SS54A SS •7-117-25 55 •••• •1504 REST POINT RO J T NT6AR0 • R N NYCARO J T NYCARO ARM NYCARO 15R4 REST POINT RO NOUNO MN SSS4A 5« 47-117-25 55 •••7 •150« REST POINT RO C J LARSEN ISO LARSEN STEPHANIE 0 • CRECO J LARSEN isao REST POINT RO NOUNO NN S5544 5S 47-117-25 55 •••• PROP AOOR 41Sn REST POINT RO OWNER NAME 0 CAVENDER • C CAVENOER TARPAYCR OAROARA ■ COLLINS CAVENOER NAME/AOOR 425 HINOENORE CURVE PLYMOUTH NN SM41 5B 47-117-25 55 ••!• •144S REST POINT RO C CAVENOER 5 0 CAVENOER COLLINS CAVENOER t OARRARA CAVENOER 1405 REST POINT RO HOUND HN 55544 5R 47-117-25 55 SOll •15RS REST POINT RO 0 W ■ J L RAMt OAVIO W • JODI L RANN 1S«S REST POINT RO NOUNO HN 5SS44 M •7-117-25 55 4412 PROP AOOR *1574 REST POINT RO OWNER NAME 0 R OLOON ETA BLOOM TAXPAYER CEORCE R A THERESA A BLOCH NAME/AOOR 1574 REST POINT RO HOUND HN S5544 5B •7-117-25 55 4415 •1445 REST POINT RO C CAVENOER A B CAVENOER C CAVENOER A B CAVENOER 1445 REST POINT RO NOUNO NN 55544 TOTAL BATCH 545 •••11 1 CERTIPV THAT THE TACTS REPRESENTED ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION Of INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON TNC RECORDS Of THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTNENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST Of NY RNOWLEDCE AND BELlCf DATE #2699 2 Completion Date: I l/IS/01 Deadline: 3/16/02 TO: Chair llaun and Orono Planning Commission Mcml>crs Ron Motnsc. City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, /itnmg Administratur/Planncr DATF; January R. 2002 SUIUtCI': «0I -27JO Ate Properties LLC. 3.175 Crystal Hay Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: List ufF.shiliit.s: I.R-IC One Family l.akcshorc Residential District (l/2 acre) 7.5 ‘)Os f (tM7acre) A Revised Site Plan/Suney H New Building Plans • HIcvatiims C New Building Plans - l•■|^KH Plans D Planning C'onunissiun Minutes (November 19. 2001) I: .Applieaiion l Aleii.sion F Stall' Re|H)i l (Nov ember 13. 2001) Review of AppHealiiin: *nie Planning C'ommission tabled this application at the rci|ucst of the applicant. I he action to table was to allow the applicant an opportunity to revise the building plans to reduce the si/e of the new house and to rev iew the issue of side yard setback encroachment StalThas recommended the new house meet the 10 ’ minimum side setback requirement for lots in the zoning district Stall's position on the side setback relates to the nanow width of the lots along Crystal Bay Road and the height of houses located on tire lots. llic new plan set has reduced the si/e of the structure from the previous proposal, but the request is to build a 1.643 s f house, lliis property has a defined lot area of 6,690 s f Properties less than 10.000 s.f. are allowed a maximum lot coverage by structure up to 1.500 s f. Tire proposed building c.xcceds the allowed coverage by 143 s f. I. S<^ction 10 25. Subdivision 6 (B) Variances requested to lot area and lot width to permit constniction of a new residence on the property in the I R-IC district less than '/j acre and 100 ’ width The defined lot area, absent the paved area of Cry stal Bay Road, is 6.690 s I’ The defined lot width is ^ at the lakeshore and defined structure setback Mi-27}0 Acefr«'pm»«IIC mt' s^iMiriiiwi Hi swiwfl 1 "'*'.-y.l^»t.hrTvn"n^ 25» > hardcover in ihc 75-250’ of ihc lakcshore. Total Area 0-75* ” 3,135 s.f. Allowed 0-75* = 0 s.f. Proptiscd 0-75* - 748 s.f. (23.8%) txisiing 0 75* = 1.414(45.1%) Total Aiea 75-250* = 3,855 s.f. Allowed 75-250* = 934 s.f. Proposed 75-250’ = 2.062 s.f. (53.4%) Existing 75-250* = 2.797 (72 5“/o) ptopeny line and I I T u. the tear lot line. pIo'll^«d^'t\^isl*J!I'<l^ line -10- on ihe tvesi property line Required Rear Setback » 30* Proposed = 19.2* 1 o in na ^nhiOvUion 15(A): Variance requested to pennit tlic caws and gutters (if '■ ^;„"l^:!:t nu.rt^ha^'.V in.« Oie side setback. The proposed eases are T mu. the east setback ,ind 2* into the west setback . torn SubdivisionJiltJ: Variance reqneMed lo pem.it the structural lot coscraBe bexcessofi.SniKf rhe/omn(tOtdinaneepemmsloleocetaceofupto 1.500s f forlot. under 10.000 s.f. ofarea. Ihe proposed house is LfiilsJ. g C..,.1„„I1.S(. s..h.t.eisionl(.(0(6): Variance requested to permit a T encroachment into the average lakeshorc setback. l).-^ckground History In 1971 the City approved variances to permit a 20' X 24' detached concrcU- storate '"'“t irr Lhind the existing house. Drawings and Council Minutes are attached to the November staff ir^Wity Sed a building p«mil a few months later for a 24' X 40- concrete attached S^g^echnically. the buildmg was not approved by a v arianee but a building perm,, was issued for the structure ■0|.27)0 Ace Profcntet Ut )J75 Cr>v “t Be> R»»l rage2 of) Site Plan/Drainase The Crystal Bay Road area has also had drainage problems in the past. Redevelopment of properties has been the b^t opportunity to correct any drainage problems that may exist in these areas. The proposed grading plan does not fully address how all drainage from the house will be handled. The new house design will improve some drainage issues by moving the house further from the property line. Final plans shall include grading and house gutter systems (if required) to handle drainage. Final drainage plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer to ensure drainage is properly directed. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the size of the structure be reduced to a size not to exceed I.SOO s.f. and the building meet the minimum 10* side setbacks. A site plan that reflects a house meeting those standards would require review of a grading and drainage plan. The drainage plan would demonstrate if the site is capable of handling the size of house proposed. The City looks at what is best for the long term plan for the City. When ordinances were adopted for structural lot coverage the City adopted this to limit the amount of dexelopmcnt in neighborhoods, and create space between buildings. Additional structure also contributes towards additional hardcover which can negatively impact water quality by not allowing storm water to run across natural ground surface. The concept is to allow storm water to be slowed and to infiltrate into the ground. Staff can support the variances to permit lot area and lot width variances, as well as rear setback and hardcover variances for the 0-75' setback for the driveway and to permit over 25°o hardcover in the 75-250' setback to allow a reasonable sized house. If a 2 '/] story house is pemiitted we do recommend the new- house meet a minimum of a 10' side setback. pianninf Commt««lon Options for Action 1, Approve 2. Denial 3. Table 4. Other Action #01-2730 Ac« rrooentet tXC. 3J75 Cf>»ul RomI ftteJori *. • l-Artijr H^uv» SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) IXISTINC HARProVER TN 7QNT A. House ft HARDCOVERJCALCULATlOiN WORKSHEETr*f T r\*sr\ /a «ti7\ ________ __ __ X 75-250*2S0.S00'S00.1000* UngOt VV.d-Ji B. Oarage C. Dri\*eway D. Sidewalk E Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plutie Or Fabric SF. .SF. S F.-Poo< WA. . S F. diu/fL SF. SF SF SF SF. SF. .SF. SF. O. Other fVlTi© ffuoc SF.-A<0 total hardcover in zone TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . B /jf 573b t X ICO -S'S SF. SF. y. PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN X^arf t CAffr^c />y / A. House _________ X UnfJl ,j u *^or /Ayct.t4C(fi ^ __________ SF. v. ..'rt Xofk. lAJdLL B. Oarage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric 1 t SF. SF. SF. SF SF. SF. SF SF. SF SF SF. SF 0. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOJAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ______________ ♦ B xlOO 37JS- SF. SF. Vi L-AC‘2t Hhovi __ hardcover CALCUL a IXO sIAVORKSUEET^^ SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* (75-250^ 250-501)' EXISTTNC HARDCOVER IN 7nvr A Houm fcviSBP B. C Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Paiio/Deck F. Landscape Undcrltin ByPluUc Or Fabric L*m^h WiAh P*roaor».|^n^^^</l7 0. Other x TOTAL HARDCOVER [N ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ‘ B \ too PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONP A House B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E Paiio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric 0. Other //r^r >r /4 ck of /foIfS6 X CfiA^ABTf r. j/6fr X 4F * €jU^00 ti/AiCj X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A - _____________ ♦ B xlOO SOO-1000* 1544“ SF. no 1797 389^ ± 72. Sg I(e<l3> 2.0ioZ 38S9 51 4 - c JU5W>_ o r."Of Hftrsc. f _SF. ec ,caNOefTV',f -StfiC 0F-H?lf _SF.-w«oo wali SF. _SF SF. -SF SF.-OfcjC _ S F.-ftrrit» Oineiey ,S F.-S£A2 Og iVv. SF. SF SF,Si>ii:je»cu ,ar.— ti/ALv$ SF. SF. y» A B SF. SF. SF. SF _SF SF -SF SF .SF. SF. SF. SF. SF. ’SF. ’ % A B MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNLNG COMIVnSSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o’clock p.m. (^1H;^22) Michael aod Monica Brown, Contioued) Rahn statra'^was not thinking of rotating the structure but merely changing the location of the doors into the > Hawn noted the Applicahi^uld prefer to have a front loading garage since there are no other side loading garages in the neighOochood. Mabusth concurred tliat is the pattemb^cvclopmcni in this area Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recbnmiend approsal of Application KOI-2722, Michael and Monica Brown, 1241 Brown Road South, gnhi(ing of variances to permit replacement of a six foot fence within $0 feet of the street property linel^apd granting of variances to permit a 10 foot side yard adjacent to the street setback and a (Is^^^setback to the alley based on the findings that the proposed garage meets the development pattHn of surrounding properties along Minnetonka Avenue and the alley is not intended to be used^roadwav purposes. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 1, Rahn Opposed. Hawn requested the Applicant have an architectural drawing prepared for Staff rev^^vs^howing all the setbacks and exact location of the garage prior to the City Council meeting Rahn stated he voted against the motion because in his view a side-loading garage vsould meet thcN. setbacks and would not require a variance. Rahn stated in his view he does not see a hardship for the NEW BI SI.NESS ^ (IM) #01-2730 ACE PROPERTIFS. 3375 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD, VARIANCES, A' 6:48 p.m. - 7:28 p.m. Larry Palm and Gary Gnifike, Ace Properties, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting variances to permit redevelopment of the property . The proposal is to remove the existing house and construct a new residence, with a 24’ by 40’ concrete Storage building that is attached to the house but is not living space to remain. The concrete building was constructed in 1971, sometime after the house was originally constructed The Applicants are proposing to retain three walls, the rear and sides, from the existing storage building being used as part of the foundation for the new house. Weinberger stated the lot consists of 6.690 square feet and lies within the LR-IC, One Family Lakeshore Residential District, which has a one-half acre minimum let size. The total area outside of the 75-foot setback is 3,855 square feet. The proposed house would be a two and a half storv house w ith a defined height of 26 feet. The existing house is one and a half stories Variances are being requested to lot area and lot width to permit construction of the new residence on a lot that is less than one-half acre and only 50 feet wide at the lakeshore and defined structure setback In addition, vanances arc being requested for hardcover and structure w ithin 75 feet of the lakeshore. PAGE 4 ^^NUTESOFTI^E ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19.2001 6:30 o'clock p.m. ((NII-2730 Ace Properties, Cootlnued) where no hardcover or structure is allowed, and a variance to permit greater than 2S percent hardcover in the 75-250’ of the lakeshore. The Applicants are proposing 19.5 percent hardcover within the 0-75' setback where 37.9 percent currently exists and are proposing 60 percent hardcover within the 75-250’ setback. Currently there is 72.5 percent hardcover within this setback area. Variances are also required to permit encroachment into the 10-foot side/rear >’ard setbacks, and to permit the existing foundation and building to be located 4.2 feet from the side property line and 19.2 feet to the rear lot line. The proposed setbacks are existing for the concrete storage building that would remain on the propert>. The Applicants are proposing to have two full stories constructed above the concrete storage building that would expand the building envelope within all required setbacks. The Applicants arc also requesting variances to permit structural lot coverage in e.xcess of 1,500 square feet. The Zoning Ordinance permits lot coverage of up to 1.500 square feet for lots under 10,000 square feet of area. The proposed house is 1,895 square feet. A variance is also being requested to permit a two foot encroachment into the average lakeshore setback as well as variances to permit e.xpansion to the structure located within 10 feet of an adjacent structure on an adjacent property Weinberger stated the City in 1971 approved variances to permit a 20' by 24' detached concrete storage building located 10 feet behind the existing house. The City issued a building permit a few months later for a 24’ by 40' concrete attached building. This is the e.xisting building that is proposed to remain on the property and used as foundation for the back half of the new house. Technically the building was not approved by a variance but a building pennit was issued for the structure. Weinberger noted the Applicant has been lequested to submit a site grading and drainage plan for Staff review Staff is recommending a reduction in the amount of structural coverage on the lot to not encroach into the side yard setbacks, but is recommending approval of the variances to lot area and lot width as well as rear setback and hardcover variances Palm indicated he has nothing to add to Staff s report. There were no public comments regarding this application. Hawn stated in her opinion the amount of structural coverage proposed for this lot is e.xcessive, noting this is basically new construction. Hawn stated she does not see a reason to grant a variance to the structural coverage in the amount proposed, noting this would be a ver> large structure on a very small lot. Palm stated he has spoken with both adjoining neighbors regarding this project who have signed a letter indicating their support of this project. Palm stated there are also two or three other houses within this neighborhood that are of similar size located on a small lot. Palm stated their intent is to nanow the old foundation by 20 feet, which leaves them pretty close to the ten foot setback, with only the rear portion of the foundation remaining. PAGES MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMAUSSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o'clock p.n. (#01-2730 Act Properties, Continued) Palm stated the lot docs have open space on either side of the house. \N ^.nberger stated Staff would review the drainage once a final site plan has been arrived at. ? problem with most of the variances being requested, but in his viexv '0 Stoddard recommended the sLctural covem« a o redesigning his plan. Palni suted U.C averag. setback would be determioed ftom the e.xitt.og coocrete foundalioo. Rahn indicated he has a concern legatding the view of the neighbors if this size smtcnire Is consirucicd 1 ITh l"hf ropogta^lty^f aeZ^ ree7oMhis"ol" on what tape of house they would like to Hawn recommended the structural coverage be limited to 15 percent. ;;r7«t ”„Tt"^rvi7ate?t^^^^^^^^^ •« •• -.soo tajui«tdwhelhe,V'”Appllctlw7uMtrertra^nZbW^^ PAGE 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO.NKVHSSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o'clock p.m. (dOl-2730 Acc Properties, Continued) Palm stated he would like to have it tabled. Stoddard moved. Mabusth seconded, to table Application ttOI-2730, Ace Properties, 3375 Crystal Bay Road, to allow the Applicant time to revise bis plans. VOTE: Aves 7, Nays 0. (#5) #01-2732 RE\TS L. STEPHENSON, HI., 1850 FOX RIDGE RO.AD, CONDITIONAL VSE PER3UT, 7:30 p.m. - 7:58 p.m. Revis Stephenson. Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant has requested a conditional use permit to permit land alteration over 500 cubic yards on the property located at 1850 Fox Ridge Road. The project would consist of clear cuRing the slope and depositing approximately 3.280 cubic yards of fill. The purpose of the project is to create a gradual slope rather than the existing steep drop from the immediate back yard of the house. The source of the fill is from the Orono Woods apartment building located at the northwest comer of Highway 12 and Brown Road Weinberger stated a conditional use permit is required for land alteration greater than 500 cubic yards. The slope on this lot is not located within a shorcland area. Weinberger stated some existing less mature trees w ould be removed within the intent of the Applicant to replant once the fill is placed on the hillside. The Applicant is also proposing to plant additional trees and natural grasses. Weinberger stated it is not the intent of the Applicant to maintain this area as lawn but as a natural area. Weinbc'ger stated approximately 300 truck loads of fill will be delivered to the site. The source of the fill is from the senior apartment building site located at Highway 12 and Brown Road. The City Engineer has expressed some concerns about the potential damage to Fox Ridge Road, which is a City street, given the number of truck loads that will be traveling ove? this road Staff is recommending the property owner provide some type of financial guarantee that could be used to correct any damaec caused by the contractors’ activities, Weinberger stated a utility easement is located through the property, which was granted in the 1970s as part of a .Metropolitan Council project. The sewer mam line was never constructed and portions of the original easement located over the 20 acre property north cf the Luce Line Trail was vacated years ago when it was determined the line would not be constructed The easement located across this property and other lots in the Fox Ridge neighborhood has not been vacated Staff is requesting input from the Metropolitan Council on the future use of this easement and whether it can be vacated. Staff is recommending approval of the application based on the follow ing conditions: 1. A detennination is made by all agencies with rights to the utility easement that 12 feet of fill can be located over the easement. 2. A lener should be submined by the property owner indicating that two silt fences would be installed to protect the existing wetland, and that the silt fence would be installed prior to any tree removal or land alteration. ^ ^ PAGE? *v * X'^.h\ GlTYofORONO Munkifnl Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Pailiwty Orono. MN SS3S6 NOTIFICATION OF 60 DAY EXTENSION MaUiBg Address: P.O Bci 66 Crystal Bay. Ud 55323 0066 December 18.2001 Lan>' Palm Ace Properties 5500 Anderson Est. Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 RE: Application #01-2730 Dear Mr. Palm: State law requires that Cities shall decide on zoning applications within 60 days from the date an application is considered complete. The review period may be extended by notification to the applicant. Your application was complete on November 15. 2001. The 60 day review period expires on -00- The Planning Commission tabled your application at your request at their meeting on November 19. 2001 with the recommendations that the building be reduced in size and the side setbacks shall be met. Final copies of the Planning Commission minutes arc available upon review and approval by the Commission. The earliest potential date the Plaitning Commission can review your application is January 22. 2002. Because the 60 day rev iew period expires prior to the next meeting, the City of Orono has extended the review period an additional 60 days to March 16.2002 On November 28, 2001 we received revised floor plans. Please submit a revised survey and hardcover calculations, drainage plans, and elevation views by December 26,2001 to remain on the January Planning Commission agenda. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions Sincerely, Paul Weinberger Zoning Administrator/Planner Tdepbooe (952) 249-4600 * Fax (9S2) 249-4616 www.da>ronojnii.iis V Completion Date: 60 Day Deadline: 1I/16AH 1/15/01 TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Paul Weinberger. Zoning Administrator/Planner November 13,2001 mo I-2730 Ace Properties LL C. 3375 Crystal Bay Road Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IC One Family Lakeshorc Residential District (1/2 acre) 7,590 s.f (0 I7acrc) List of Exhibits: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Application Plat Map Description of Request Structural Engineer Report (Ericksen Road & Associates 10/16/01) Site Photo Building Permit (9/3/71) 1971 Approved Site Plan PC Minutes (5/17/01) CC Minutes (5/24/71) Stair Memo (5/6/71) Existing Site Survey Proposed Site Survey Proposed Elevation Views Proposed Floor Plans Hardcover Calculation Worksheets Application Sumroary : Ace Properties has requested variances to pennit redevelopment of the property. The existing house is proposed to be removed, except a 24' X 40 ’ concrete storage building that is attached to the house but is not living space. The concrete building was constructed in 1971 sometime after the house was built. Three walls (rear and sides) from the existing storage building would be used as part of the foundation for the new house. The lot is located on Crystal Bay Road where most lots are small and are divided from the lakeshorc by the roadway. The total area outside of the 75' setback is 3,855 s.f. The proposed house would be a 2 '/> story house with a defined height of 26'. The existing house is a 1 '/j stories, and has much less finished living space than the proposed house. •01 -ITJO Ace Prepertiei LLC 3J75C»y««lBjy Roed fttalot* Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.25. Subdivision 6 fB>: Variances requested to lot area and lot width to permit construction of a new residence on the property in the LR-IC district less than '/»acre and 100’ width. The defined lot area, absent the paved area of Ciystal Bay Road, is 6.690 s.f. The defined lot width is 5J2| at the lakeshore and defined structure setback. 2. Section 10.55. Subdivision 8. Section 10.22. Subdivisions I and 2. and Subdivision 10.56. Subdivision 16(L) I and 2: Variances requested for hardcover and structure within 75' of the lakeshore. where no hardcover or suucture is allowed, and a variance to permit greater than 25% hardcover in the 75-250 ’ of the lakeshore. Total Area 0-75' « 3.735 s.f Allowed 0-75 ’ - 0 s.f Proposed 0-75 ’ - 730 s.f (19.5%) Existing 0-75 ’» 1,414 (37.9®/o) Total Area 75-250 ’ « 3.855 s.f Allowed 75-250* - 934 s.f Proposed 75-250 ’ - 2.306 s.f (60*/i) Existing 75-250 ’ - 2,797 (72.5«/o) 3. Sccllon 10.25. Subdivision 6 fB): Variances requested to allow encroachment into the 10' side/rear yard setbacks, and to permit the existing foundation and building to be located 4.2’ from the side property line and 19.2' to the rear lot line Required Side Setback - 10' Proposed = 4.2’ east property line - 5.1 ’ on the west property line Required Rear Setback » 30’ Proposed = 19.2 ’ • The proposed setbacks are existing for the concrete storage building that would remain on the property. Please note the concrete building is proposed to have two full stories constructed above that would expand the building envelope within all required setbacks. **• Swliffn IQ Q3..StiMivi?ion |4(C): Variance requested to permit the structural lot coverage in excess of 1.500 s.f The Zoning Ordinance permits lot coverage of up to 1,500 s f for lots under 10,000 s.f of area. The proposed house is 1.895 s f 5- Sgsiion lQ,56.SMMtvisi9n 16(C)(6): Variance requested to permit a 2’ encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. 6. Variances to permit expansion to the structure located within 10’ of an adjacent structure on an adjacent property. •o:-27JO Ac» Pfcpmio Lie J375 Ciyiul Bjy Road Pift 2 of4 Background/Historv In 1971 the City approved variances to permit a 20' X 24' detached concrete storage building located 10' behind the existing house. Drawings and Council Minutes have been attached. The City issued a building permit a few months later for a 24' X 40' concrete attached building. This is the existing building that is proposed to remain on the property and be used as foundation for the back half of the new house. Technically, the building was not approved by a variance but a building permit w^ issued for the structure. Sil? Plpn/Drainace Staff had delivered a letter on October 24,2001 requesting a site grading plan and drainage. The plan was completed by Gronberg & Associates on November IS, 2001. Staff has not had an opportunity to review the fm»I site plans to make a recommendation on the grading/drainage plan, liie City Engineer will be consulted on this since the property is a small lakeshore lot w ith a large amount of hardcover. The Crystal Bay Road area has also had drainage problems in the past. Redevelopment of properties has been the best opportunity to correct any drainage problems that may exist in these areas. Primary Issues for Discussion: 1. The proposed house is 1,895 s.f. A variance is required to permit more than 1.500 s.f on this lot. The existing structural lot coverage is 1,944 s f Tltc primoiy difference is the finished living space would be increased to approximately 5,000 s.f.. where only about 1,900 s.f. of living space exists. The increase in living space is accomplished by converting the existing storage building from storage space to living space and adding two floors of living space above the storage building, and having a 2 Vj story house rather than the existing I '/> story house. The massing on the property will be greatly increased 2. The increased mass may effect the light and air space to adjacent properties? 3. Should a final grading and drainage plan be approved by the City Staff prior to proceeding w ith the variance requests? MI>2730 Acc Fnpenks LLC )j75Cf>«UB«)rRg*i r«(3of4 Stiff Staff has recommended the applicants reduce the mass of the proposed building to not encroach into the side yard setbacks. The concern is the existing building is within 4' of the side property line. A building wall of 30* would be located only 4’ from the property line, where a one story storage building is located. Other than building height, at issue is the fact that the use of a house is different than that of a building used for storage (Activity, mass, windows, etc.) Secondly, the City looks at what is best for the long term plan for the City. WTten ordinances were adopted for structural lot coverage the City adopted this to limit the amount of development in nei^borhoods. and create space between buildings. Additional structure also contributes towards additional hardcover which can negatively impact water quality by not allowing storm water to run across natural ground surface. The concept is to allow storm water to be slowed and to infiltrate into the ground. Staff can support the variances to permit lot area and lot width variances, as well as rear setback and hardcover variances for the 0-75’ setback for the driveway and to permit over 25% hardcover in the 75-250' setback to allow a reasonable sized house. If a 2 '/i story house is permitted we do recommend the new house meet a minimum of a 10' side setback. Planning CoromissioB Options for Action 1. Approve 2. Denial 3. Table 4. Other Action «0I-2TM An Pnptnkf LIT. 3)75Cr>«t^a4rRMd r^4oT4 Description of Request The existing residence has a, 40 feet wide by 48 feet deep foundation and lower level area. The fint floor covers 40 feet wide by roughly 25 feet deep. After meeting with Mr. Paul Weinberger on site October 11,2001, the following consensus was arrived at: Leaving the newer rear foundation intact at 40 feet wide. Wc intend to remove the existing first level entirely. The lower level or basement level foundation would be removed from the front of the structure back roughly 20 to 25 feet not to exceed the newer foundation line. Once the removal is complete the new foundation would start at the remaining foundation and step in 4 feet on both east and west sides. The new east and west wall line would travel north approximately 6 feet further to the 75-foot set back line. This would become the front or north elevation of the structure. Finally, the driveway would be a two-car drive at the structure reducing down as it meets the street. Hardships (Description of Unusual Property Conditions The existing lot is approximately 159 feel deep by 50 feet wide. Crystal Bay Road cuts thru the property between the lake and existing residence. The basement foundation width is 40 feet on a 50-foot wide lot. Existing lot conditions with a 75 feel setback and existing structure as it is provide considerable issues to overcome. In an effort to retain a manageable site and step towards city set back and hard cover issues the proposal is offered for variance approval. ky||||[fe O O 77 .W ^ S'- , .•^.‘e>,.P'' -> •i'-'i;;*!'-;- MV'-"^ tesa■ n ’!■/ I 'fti'-? i-:m :m m^;M ... ^ pr«» M ^*'}..^ •• SifsT,-'! 'V^<f*v CA^'f ui^^^%^ •"T* i VILLAGE OF ORONO Rogular Meeting of the Village Council, May 24, 1971 The Village Council net on the above date with the following nenbers present: Mayor Oborhauser, Councilnen Dorn, ftcCarthy, and Searles. Absent: Councilman Frantel. Councilman Dorn left early. McCarthy moved, Oberhauser seconded, that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 10, 1971, be approved. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Searles moved, McCarthy seconded, that a public hearing for a building permit for the Clark Oil Company at 3S30 Shoreline Drive, be held at 8:00 P.M., June 14, 1971, in the Council Chambers, be ordered. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Road, for a variance, be approved. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Dorn moved, Oberhauser seconded, that the reouest of Thomas Navratil for a variance to build a residence on each of Tracts B J C, RLS 891, be approved. lotion. Ayes (4) Nays (0). Tiie Mayor announced that this was the tine wllriro of^Public Hearing and the Affidavit Hf^Publication and the Certificate of Mailing to affected property owners. After all tn< 7:30 P.M. MINir.EC Mnbers of the public present were afforded gn opportunity to be heard, the hearing was closed. moved. McCarthy seconded, that S?"i5USri392. A R«ol..tlon Ord.rlns H.ter Improvement !n The Fagerness Point Of Orono And Directing Preparation Plans And Specifications For 1970Uf-lA, SJ SdS”t«5. nStlon. Ay« (4) . N.ys (0). PUBLIC HEARING DATE Clark Oil Company VARIANCE 3375 Crystal Bay Ro^ VARIANCE Tracts B 8 C • RLS 851 PUBLIC HEARING 1970LW-1A Fagerness Point Water RESOLUTION »392 1970LW-1A Fagerness Point Water mP i-'r- V’aaV- s I >r • si TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Ralph Martin Mike Scheller May 6, 1971 Variance - Jay Reiser - 3375 Crystal Bay Road storage shed 3 fron the side line and 10* fron rear lot line. ^oble«s involved are the nearness of the adjacent gar.ige to the proposed structure. The railroad abuts the rear of*the*property. The need for the structure, as stated in the application, is the need for more storage and a storm cellar. He has permission fron his neighbor that he is encroacned on. REMARKS! THIS IS RECOM!>SirDSD BY T.HS PLANNING C0M:!IS::I0N BUT APPARENTLY INVOLVES SOME TYPE 0? COiCSKCIAL STOPJ^GS IN A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD WITHIN JIYE PEET OP HIS NEIG.HB0R3 GARAGE. WE NEED TO KNOW WHAT TYPE 0? STORAGE IS CONTEMPLATED SINCE HE ONLY HAS ONE-PIPTH ACP.E LOT A-ND THEPE PEALLY IS HOT ENOUGH ROOM OK THE LOT TO BUILD THIS STP.UCTUPE PROPERLY. pj;lph martin 5/20/71 ' HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LAKE Minnetonka Q29.4 CONTOUR LINEv CRYSTAL BAY o \ SURVEY LINE 15 EXISTING HOUSE 'aoon ■r^i' EXISTING A •<§, EXISTING HOUSE HOUSE 7 %. \f ?IPTI0N OF PREMISES : HENNEPIN UUUIMI 1, wiuMiNi-ow i MINNETONKA 920.4 CONTOUR Lt6^CRYSTAL BAY ?*7 \ ;■ (t4*y 5-<0' \ y-«r. eA***-f ourntftout ^ c*.^f*r T» .-;.. ^ •- .•-, ‘ \ ^«; rr - V • -•w-i- ' Va* #’^m ■■^■■Vr}^ V- •V :• •'. ■'C rV--^• . i.V ••K.Wr t f ! W • WMmmsmwmmmifmimimmi f~?|r*"i^,yr~i 15 ■•t V • k i it- -u . ■•■:■ ■ ■Jii. • € t-•^ITkfc ymmmm: * V,.. ^ ! # vv-» <0K r:^1 >•*he*/\ \L.^> WES sc.t*. i/v*i*-r EVA Hitflvv Sc«ir> l/«’M’-«* ■ • : \ i!r . ! 24*-10* 2N u*i«< i/4*«r-r R / SETBACK ZONEt (CIRCLE ONE) EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______________ Ungth HARDCOVERi^ALCULATlON U OUKSUEET /fAe/VCf Ctzs? X 75-250*250-500*500.1000' WidJi B. Girage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E PaUo/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plutic Or Fabric O. Other SF. .SF. SF.-POCK WAC .SF. SF SF .SF SF SF. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AilEA IN ZONE A _____________ - B M /J ^73b t \ ICO ?7. S'S SF SF .SF fMTio PtOCi. S F.-^O SF A SF B V. PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE : CArfrJc f/j ASTftJ SC^n,rAA> ti A.er 7 A7fLt4a ^ A. House B. Oarage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. PatioDeck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric O. Other COAjf(d.(i t4 9 I SF SF. SF. SF. .SF. SF .SF SF. .SF. SF. SF. SF TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _____________ - B J7)S- X 100 /P. 94- SF SF H REQUIRED SUBMITTALS ____Completed Application Form. /2. ____ Describe request in detail. * -------Certinrf Property OuTiets List of oilers wiihin labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin Count\- Department of Finance A-603, Government Center,~34»9?yi). Uf/Z ’J>/S~S’VD ^ ------- Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. _____ Attach legal description to application if not included on required surv ’cy. ----Topographic survey (c.xisting and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). — List of the legal names (include mantal status) of all persons with on interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicani(s) if not current owiier(s) — Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). — As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 30 COPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS Sl^MiyED. (Staff will require to scale drawings of all documents, plans, etc to be submitted.) The ApplicMt and Property Owner musi si^n ibis applicauen. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:________________________ 5. 6. 8. 9. APPLICANT S SIGNATURE pie applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested bv the Zonina Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered bv oriainal fee pavmcnO andor unusual expenses incuned in review of Uiis application, and certifies tliat the inferination supplied IS true and correct to the best of his,her knowledge. Applicant's signature correct to the best of* his Date /n-m- O / OWNER'S SIG.NATURE Owned, signature Date IQ-Il- O / scheduled review neelii,,. of die Planni-i, Cwnmusioo Jid CrJeJ h „ LS U a Khcduled metnnf. please make amngemenu lo have an authorized agent aiten^^n vour /"'"a* Building Sc. Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting ^ P e and advise the f-Ij:O 1 Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Uepartrij^j-f^ • 99 Fourth Prizes: A trip to the Richard Petty Driving School Experience. > To qualify for the prize pool drawing, your location will be inspected twice in 2001 (once February through June and again July through November) and must meet one of two criteria; Top Performers Pool: All retail locations with a 95' score or better get one entry Into the prize pool per inspection (if they perform in that range for both inspections they get entered twice). Most Upwardly Mobile Pool: Those locations that represent the top 20'^ increase in score from inspection 1 to inspection 2 and have a minimum score of 903& on the second inspection win one entry into the prize pool. Though two inspections are required, there is no limit to the number of inspections you can have. The more inspections, the more opportunities for entry in the prize pool (More insp ;ctions don't just mean more opportimitics to win. They also provide an on going rcMlity chock on how you're matching up with customer o«pectJtions against their standards for an Inviting image and shopping e»perience). Ask your CITGO Gasoline Supplier about scheduling additional inspections to i crease your charices m The Checkered F/ag Oialicnge. For more information, review the Image Value brochure sent to you m late Jariuary or contact your CITGO Gasoline Supplier. VVithm the brochure you will find a conip'i'hr - ve list of "Dos and Oon'ts" along with a ■ score yourself" criteria iisr to help you get on ' le starting blocks Keeping it clean will put you in the running for the Checkered Flag Challenge. y - ; PAoe x-a CANOPY/ISLANDS IMAGE STANDARDS 24" Formed Plastic Letters - C^tu 77/tf /VtS , Non-llluminated I i FACE ELEVATION .125TUF-GLAS CITGO BLUE mo ALL-THREAD CUT 2* LONG (FURNISHED BY SIGN SUPPLIER) ACRYLIC MOUNTING CUP APPLY ADHESIVE TO BOND WELD CLIP TO FACE TYPICAL SECTION DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS Size; Area — Letter Faces Only - 9.52 Sq. FI. Area — Encompassing Rectangle -16.66 Sq Ft. Actual Size -24" Vacuum Formed Letters Approx. Weight - 23 lbs. Design Windload - 30 PSF 101 5/16" (8 ‘ — 5 5/16‘) O.A.L. FACE w/TRlMCAP ELEVATION 1 • OI I '•i Electrical; Amps - 3.0 FORMED LETTER CANOPY FASCIA 1* DIA. PERFORATED PAD (FURNISHED BY INSTALLER) APPLY SILICON ADHESIVE TO BONO TO MOUNTING SURFACE. APPLY SUFFICIENT SILICON TOALLOW EXCESS TO SQUEEZE OUT THROUGH HOLES ON PERFORATED PAD. #10 ALL-THREAD CUT 2* LONG USE HOLE PATTERN TEMPLATE. (FURNISHED BY SIGN SUPPLIER) TO DRILL 3/8' HOLES IN WALL TYPICAL PAD MOUNT DETAIL (USE FOR BLIND INSTALLATION ON THIN FASCIA) FORMED LETTER USE HOLE PATTERN TEMPLATE. (FURNISHED BY SIGN SUPPUER) TO DRILL 3/8' HOLES IN WALL INSTALL (1) NUT 4(1) WASHER ON \ EACH STUD. ADJUST NUTS SO THAT LETTERS ARE FLUSH TO WALL PUSH LETTERS IN PLACE 4 SECURE i 11 r STUDS FROM BEHIND w/WASHERS I *•' t- AND NUTS (WASHERS AND NUTS ^ \ SUPPLIED BY INSTALLER). ^ #10 ALL-THREAD CUT 2* LONG w/WASHERS 4 #10 NUTS TYPICAL SURFACE STUD MOUNT w/NUT DETAIL (USE WHERE ACCESS IS AVAILABLE THROUGH FASCIAI aluminum CABINET TUF-GLAS BLUE 5 1/2* TUBE SUPPORT. w/WIRE ^ NEON 24' TUBING HORIZON BLUE ELECTROBIT ECSW 13MM WHITE ATTACH TO WALL w/ 3/8* LAG BOLTS OR APPROPRIATE FASTENER TO SUIT MATERIAL r 1/2' RIGID CONDUIT / w/CONNECTORS 2 AT EACH LETTER TUFF-HIDE GTO-15 w/INTEGRAL SLEEVE 1 0 AMPS NEON & MOUNTING LAYOUT SIGN SPECIFICATIONS Area —^Letter Faces Only - 9 96 Sq Ft __ _ _ 7 - __ Encompassing Rectangle -17.28 Sq Ft: Circuits - (t) 20 Designed Windload - 30 PSF I Volts-120 -16- DRAIN HOLES - AT LOW POINT IN EACH LETTER TRANS 1230 TRANS BOX 30MA CANOPY FASCIA TYPICAL SECTION DETAIL Oi~ Dy3/ B - Bolwoon Polos SIGN SYSTEM: J *Insert corresponding code for Mounting Option. See list of options below. Standard 6' x 8' Illuminated Sign -12' Pole • • • • • .* ' # / • • % SIGN SPECIFICATIONS Amps: 5.0 Net Weight; 260 lbs. Area: 48 Square leet POLE Design Windload: 35 PSF/1 OOMPH Pole Supports; 8"x6"x 1/4"x 12' tube Baseplates; r x22"x21" Anchor Bolts: 1 1/4" X 48" + 6" hook FOUNDATION 36" Dia. X 7’-6" Deep ‘Mounting Option Codes C - Center Polo B - Between Poles 8*-0' « O s 0.00 0 00^^UlOKjm 0 00^'^’°■ V# \gr IMOUNU) -15- 2’ X 8‘ Credit Card Panel *. .• V-:' • • • • A • -s * pn> * • G SEC. 10.40. B-1 RETAIL SALES BUSINESS DISTRICT. §10.40 , f '■ >0 provide adistnct for businesses that supply eoramodilies or perform a serviee primarily for residenis in the o . Subd. 2. Application. All applications for a building pennit in any "B-r’Retail Sales reviewed by the Council and may be referred to the Planning Commission . t ^ "B-1" Retail Sales Bu.sinessDism^^^ or land shall be used except for one of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the Council: A. Retail and Service Businesses. The following neighborhood retail sales and service businesses supplying commodities or performing a service primarily for residents in the surrounding neighborhood: 1. Arts and school supplies store. 2. Banks and insurance companies. 3. Barber and beauty shops. 4. Bicycle sales and repair. 5. Books, magazines, record shop. 6. Dings, candy, ice cream, soft drinks, cosmetics and other usual dru" store 7. Dry cleaning and laundry pick-up stations including incidental pressing and 8. Garden supplies, florist shop. 9. Gift or antique shops. 10. Hardware store, paint store. 11. Hobby shops, camera and photographic supplv stores. 12. Jewelry shops and repair. 13. Laundromats. 14. Locksmith. 15. Music, radio, TV, appliance sales and repair stores. 16. Newsstands. 17. Office supply store, office machine store. 18. Pet shop. 19. Pipe and tobacco shops. 20. Plumbing, electrical, heating, housewares, furniture, carpet store. 21. Postal substation. 22. Real estate sales. merchandise, repair. ORONO CC 332 (4-1-84) § 10.40 23. Retail food of all vaneties and home supplies. 24. Sewing cenfei and yardgoods. 25. Sporting goods store. 26. 1 ailor shops. 27. Temporary sales such as Christmas tree lots. 28. Travel bureau. 29. Variety store. 30. Wearing apparel store, shoe store. 31. Off-sale Liquor Store Source: Ordinance 29,2nd Series Adopted: 2-23-87 32. Home and garden equipment rental. Source: Ordinance 152,2nd Series Adopted: 10-28-96 B. Municipal Buildings. Municipal buildings where the use conducted is customarily considered to be an office use. Subd. 4. Conditional Uses. Within the "B-1" Retail Sales Business District no structure or land shall be used for one of the following uses except by conditional use permit: A. Garages. For the servicing and repair of automobiles provided repair flmctions arc totally enclosed in a building. B. Motor Fuel Stations. Subject to the provisions set forth in Section 10.61, Subdivision 18. C. Restaurants (Class I). Food is served to customer while seated at counter or table. Cafeteria - Food is selected by a customer while going through a line and taken to a table for consumption. Neither live entertainment nor intoxicating liquor sales are permitted in Restaurants (Class 1.) Source: Ordinance 67,2nd Series Adopted: 5-8-89 D. Restaurants (Class II). Fast Food, Convenience, Drive-in, and Liquor Store Restaurants. A restaurant where a majority of customers order and are serv’ed their food at a counter in packages prepared to leave the premises to be consumed; or a drive-in where most customers consume their food in an automobile regardless of how it is served, or restaurants which serve intoxicating liquor or have live entertainment. ORONO CC 333 (4-1-84) §10.40 E- OfT-Street Parking. Off-street Parking when the principal site of the off-street parking abuts on a lot which is (in) another ’•B" or’T’ District and is in the same ownership as the land in the 'B or "I" DisUict and subject to those conditions as set forth in Section 10.61, Subdivision 4 and such other conditions as found necessary by the Council. F. Public Semces. Public service structures, including, but not limited to, electric transmission lines and buildings such as telephone exchange stations, booster or pressure stations, elevated t^, lift stations and electric power substations. Personal wireless seivice and commercial* broadcasting antennas and towers shall not be considered public service structures. Source: Ordinance No. 183,2nd Scries Adopted: 2-22-99 . G. Nurseries. Day nurseries provided not less than 50 square feet of outside plav area per pupil is available and fenced. H. Offices. Professional office and offices of a general nature. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 I. Antenna Structure. One independent antenna stfueturc, with antenna or combination of antenna attached thereto, subordinate to and 3cr\'ieing the principal use er struetufc on the same lot and eustomarily-ineidental thereto that ia not attaclitd to another structure provided the height of the antenna atructurc doca not exceed 65 feet and the antenna atrueture is set back from anv lot line a distanee-at least-equal-to the total height of the antenna stiueture. Source; Ordinance No. 177 Effective Date: 6 5 -75 (Subd. 41 deleted per Ordinance No. 161, 2nd Series, adopted 5-27-97) Subd. 5. Accessory Uses. Within any "B-r Retail Sales Business District, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses: in this Chapter. A. Garages, Etc. Private garages, off-street parking and loading spaces, as regulated B. Signs. Signs, as regulated in this Chapter. C. Temporary Buildings. Buildings temporarily located for purposes of construction on the premises for a period not to e.xcced time necessary to complete said construction. ORONO CC 334 (4-1-84) §10.40 D. Landscaping. Decorative landscape features. E. Fences. Fences, as regulated in this Chapter. F. Incidentals. Any incidental repair or processing necessary to conduti a pemiitted principal use, provided that the incidental use shall not e.xceed 30% of the floor space of U/.* principal building. G. Public Telephone Booths. Source: Ordinance No. 172 Effective Date: 1-1-75 H. Communication Reception/Transmission Devices 1. Accessory Antennas. Accessory antennas shall be limited to radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dishes, TVRO’s, and amateur short-wave radio transmitting and receiving antennas. Accessory antennas that are accessory to the principal use of the property are permitted accessory’ uses in all zoning districts provided they meet the following conditions: a. Height. A ground mounted accessory antenna shall not e.xceed twenty (20) feet in height from ground level. b. Yards. Accessory tintennas shall not be located within the required front yard setback, comer side yard setback or side yard setback abutting a street. c. Roofs. If vegetation or obstructions interfere with satellite signals at a location in any allowable placement area, the accessory antenna may be placed on the roof of any authorized structure on the premises. d. Accessoiy antennas shall not be located within a required yard or setback area or within drainage or utility easements. Antenna towers shall be set back from adjacent property lines a horizontal distance no less than the maximum height of the antenna. e. Building Permits. A building permit shall be required for the installation of any accessoiy antenna requiring a conditional use permit. Building permit applications shall be accompanied by a site plan and structural component data for the accessory’ antenna, including details of anchoring. The Building Official must approve the plans before installation. ORONO CC 335 (4-1-84) § 10.40 f. Lightning Protection. Each accessory antenna shall be grounded to protect against natural lightning strikes in conformance with the National Electrical Code as adopted by the Cit}’ of Orono. g. Electrical Code. Accessoiy antenna electrical equipment and connections shall be designed and installed in conformance with the National Electrical Code as adopted by the City of Orono. shall not be used as signage. h. Color/Contcnt. Accessory antennas shall be of a neutral color and 2. Amateur Short-Wave Radio Antennas and Towers which do not meet the conditions for accessory antennas, may be allowed with a conditional use permit in all zoning districts provided they meet the following conditions: a. Height. When an amateur short-wave radio antenna is mounted on an antenna tower, the total height of the antenna and tower shall not exceed 65 feet. b. Yards. Amateur short-wave radio antennas and towers shall not be located within a ftoni, comer side or side yard. c. Setbacks. Amateur short-wave radio antennas and towers shall not be located within any required setback area and shall be located no less than the height of the antenna and tower from the property line. Source: Ordinance No. 183,2nd Series Adopted: 2-22-99 Subd. 6. Area, Height, Lot Width, Setback Requirements and Design Requirements. A. Area. The minimum lot size shall be 20,000 square feet. B. Lot Width. The minimum lot width shall be 100 feet. C. Front Yards. The minimum front yard shall be 20 feet. D. Rear Yards. The minimum rear yard shall be 30 feet; side yard adjacent to "R" District shall be 15 feet; side yard adjacent to street shall be 10 feet. E. Setback Requirements. No building shall be nearer than 35 feet to any front lot line, 35 feet from any rear lot line, 15 feet frem any side lot line, 35 feet to side lot line adjacent to street; except abutting or across the street from an "R" District, no building shall be less than 35 feet from such lot line. ORONO CC 335-1 (4-1-84) § 10.40 F. Fencing. WTierever a "B-l" Retail Sales Business District abuts an "R" District, along the side or rear lot line, a fence or compact evergreen hedge no less than 50% opaque nor less than six feet in height shall be erected along the abutting lines except within the required front yard. G. Building Design and Construction. In addition to other restrictions of this Chapter, the use, construction, alteration or enlargements to any building or structure within the district shall meet the following standards: 1. All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be: (a) Face brick, or, (b) Natural stone, or. (c) Specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture, or, (d) Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials be of any of those noted in Items (a), (b) and (c) above. (e) Other materials as may be approved by the Council. Combinations of such materials shall be permitted. 2. All subsequent additions and outbuildings constructed after the erection of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming with the original architectural design and general appearance. 3. No building or structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent or shack shall be constructed, placed or maintained upon the property except as accessory to and during the construction of permanent buildings. H. Drainage. No land shall be developed and no use shall be permitted that results in water runoff causing floods, erosion, or deposits on adjacent properties. Site and drainage plans shall be submitted by the applicant in such detail as required by the Council and those plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer before submission to the Planning Commission and Council for approval. Such runoff may be required to be properly channeled into a natural water course, ponding area, storm drain or other public facilities. Any change in grade affecting water runoff w hether onto adjacent property or othervrise must be in compliance with the Surface Water Management Plan and shall be consistent with other applicable regulations or City Code provisions and subject to the approval of other agencies having jurisdiction over the area affected by the drainage. I. Height. No structure or building shall e.xceed 2-1/2 stories or thirty feet in height except as provided in Section 10.75. ORONO CC 335-2 (4-1-84) O Ov n CITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 Mailing Address; P.O Bc< 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066 October 18, 2001 REQUEST FOR FlIRTHER INFORMATION Mr. Leroy Koelinen Navarre Amaco 3360 Shoreline Drive P. O. Box 8 Navarre. MN 55392 SUBJECT: Zoning Application 7^01-2731 The City of Orono is required to notify you within ten (10) business days as to the status of your application for variance. The following infomiation is required before we can proceed with your request. □ A Certiheate ot Survey/I lardcover Sur\ey indicating location of all structures, canopies and drives on the properly. □ Mailing labels of all properties within 350' of the property. \pplication "01-2731 is incomplete. It you wish to proceed with your application please submit all items requested above by November I. 2001 to remain on the November 19. 2001 Planning Commission agenda. Please call me at (952) 249-4600 should you have any questions. Sincerely. Paul Weinberger Zoning Administrator/PIamier Hand Delivered (October 18, 2001) Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616 WH>i'.cl.orono.mn.us i TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Wendy Bottenberg. Zoning Administrator/Planner Januar>' 17,2002 SUBJECT: #01-2735 Proposed Amendment of Zoning Code - Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C): Lot Coverage by Structures Standards Exhibits: A Hackbeny Hill B Chevy Chase Drive C Webber Hills D Chippewa Lane and Tumham Road E Map of non-shoreland/less than 2 acre lots in Orono F Surveys of properties Request: Planning Commission review scenarios regarding hardcover on non-shoreland lots that are less than 2 acres in area. Recommend whether a non-shoreland hardcover ma.\imum should be established for small lots. Summary: Under the proposed amendment, in ground pools and their associated grade level patios would no longer be considered as structures for the purpose ot calculating "lot coverage by structures.’* The original lot coverage ordinance adopted in 1989 did not include pools in the calculation of lot coverage. The ordinance was later amended si.\ months after its adoption to include pools and their associated patios. October 22, 2001: City Council approved variance application to replace a home on Chevy Chase Drive. Indicating the lot coverage ordinance should be revisited, specifically regarding in ground pools. November 19. 2001: Planning Commissioi: recommended approval of changing the lot coverage ordinance to not include pools and associated patios in lot coverage by structures by a 4-3 vote. The majority camp supported the change, but only if accompanied by a new hardcover limitation on all non shoreland residential lots under 2 acres in area (SO®/© was suggested). The minority camp was against the proposed amendment stating pools and their associated patio'decks should continue to be calculated as lot coverage by structure and suggested that decks regardless of height should also be considered for inclusion as lot coverage. November 26, 2001: City Council tabled lot coverage ordinance in order to review it in a joint work session with the Planning Commission and City Council. December 20, 2001: Joint work session with City Council and Planning Commission. The following points or changes came out of the work session: • Low pools and patios that have no elements higher than 6' above grade should NOT be included in the calculation of lot coverage by structures. Lot Coverage Ordinance January 17, 2002 Page 2 • Structural coverage calculations shall include building protrusions more than 6' above grade, i.e. not just the building footprint but the vertical projection of any parts of the building that are more than 6' above grade. • The outer 2’ of roof overhangs shall not be considered as lot coverage. • Open decks with any portion of railing above 6’ will be counted as lot coverage in their entirety. • Hardcover limits for non-shoreland area needs to be looked at closer. The limit was not decided - ideas included but not limited to: 50% hardcover limit, some other percentage or a percentage of the buildable area on a property. Anaivsi.s: Of the approximately 3.000 residential lots in Orono, 616 lots are non-shoreland and less than 2 acres in area. (Map-Exhibit E) A small sampling of these properties was looked at to develop scenarios in which to determine the potential impacts of a hardcover limitation. Three scenarios were developed- 50% hardcover on total lot area, 50% hardcover on buildable area and 80% hardcover on buildable area. Four different neighborhoods in the city were chosen where the lots are 2 acres or less in area - Hackberr) Hill. Chevy Chase Drive, Webber Hills, and Chippewa l aneTumham Road. If a survey was on tile for the property dated 1990 or later the property was included in the study. Each area contains lots that are substandard in area as compared to the zo.ning requirement. * Note: Many of the properties did not have surv eys on tile because hardcov er has not been an issue with non-shoreland properties or improvements have not occurred on the property. For example. 1 lackbcrry Hill neighborhood has 20 properties and only 7 had surveys. Calculations of “total lot area" and “buildable area ” (total lot area minus setbacks) were then completed for each property. The calculations are in table form (See E.xhibits A-D). Hardcover calculations were then completed for each lot showing: a. Allowed hardcover s.f at 50% of lot area. (Scenario 1) b. Allowed hardcover s.f at 50% of buildable area. (Scenario 2) c. Allowed hardcov er s.f at 80% of buildable area. (Scenario 3) d. The amount of hardcov er existing on lot and percentage of total lot area Included in the existing hardcover on lot calculation is the residence (including garage) detached garage, deck. pool, driveway and walkways. In many cases, the size of the driveway and walk were estimated because in the past hardcover was not an issue with these properties so when a survey was completed hardcover items were not included. Lot Coverage Ordinance Januar> 17,2002 Page 3 The surveys arc included (Exhibit F) to aid visualizing hardcover on the properties. Analysis Results: The analysis show:; the follow ing: a. No properties are approaching 50 “ b hardcover based on total lot area, even for the small lots, most are less than 30%. b. Some properties have hardcover over or close to 50% buildable area. c. A large proportion of small lots in a large zoning district (Sec Tumham Road/Chippewa Lane) already have hardcover over 80% of buildable area, because buildable area is so small. Staff Recommendation: Reviewing the three scenarios: -Staff concludes that hardcover limited to 50% or 80% of buildable area does not provide equity to all property owners, because buildable area is so variable for a given size lot depending on the zoning district. -Staff concludes that limiting hardcover to 50% of total lot area is high. Of the properties reviewed, none were close to the 50% hardcover limit. -If 50% is the recommended amount, w ill property owners add improvements so half of their property is covered? Staff rer jmmends using the total lot area and a percentage smaller than 50% for allowed hardcover, if a hardcover standard is needed at all. The amp attached slows that the actual number of lots less than 2 acres and not in shoreland is a small percentage of the total lots in the city. Planning Commission Options: 1. Recommend hardcover percentage based on total lot area.(Staff suggests 35%. consistent with the 500-1000' zone. 2. Recommend hardcover percentage based on buildable area. 3. Table the matter to a work session for further discussion; direct staff eis to what additional information could be provided that will be useful. 4. Other. Hackberry Hill .5 acre lots (21,780 s.f)Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Address Total Lot Buldable Area 50% HC Total Lot 50% HC Buildabtc Area 80% HC Buildable Area Existing HC on lot 22 17,460 s.f.8.740 s.f.8,730 s.f 4.370 s.f.6.992 s.f.5,466.9s.f. 31 30% 35 21,049 s.f.11,704 s.f.10,524 s.f.5,852.S.f.9,363.2 s.f.3,192 s.f. 15.20% 66 17,460 s.f.8,855 s.f.8,730 s.f.4,427.5 s.f.7,084 s.f.2,888.4s.f. 16.50% 96 17,050 s.f.8,230 s.f.8,525 s.f 4,115 s.f.6.584 s.f.2,719.8s.f. 15.90% 125 21,700 s.f.13,175 s.f.10,850 s.f.6.587.5 s.f.10,540 s.f.2.557 s.f. 11.80% 140 32,100 s.f.13.260 s.f.11,550 s.f.6,630 s.f.10,608 s.f.2.888.7s.f. 8 90% 185 24,150 s.f.13,760 s.f.12,075 s.f.6,880 S.f.11,008 s.f.4,622.1s.f. 19.10% r Chevy Chase Drive 1 Acre Lot (43.560 s.f.)Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Address Total Lot Buildable Area 50% HC Total Lot 50% HC Buildable Area 80% HC Buildable Area Existing HC on lot 102 16.847 s.f.7.800 s.f.8.423 5 s.f 3.900 s.f.6.240 S.f.3.545.3 s.f 21% 123 21.294 s.f.10.564 s.f.10,647 s.f.5.282 s.f.8.451 2 s.f.3.309 s.f. 15.50% 12S 19.886 s.f.9.794 s.f.9.943 s.f.4.897 s.f.7.835.2 S.f.2.780 s.f. 13.90% 129 27.586 s.f.18.536.5 s.f.13.793 s.f.9.268 25 S.f.14.829.2 s.f.4.113 s.f. 14.90% 133 21.709 s.f.11.250 s.f.10 854 5 s.f.5,625 S.f.9.000 s.f.4.210 S.f. 19.40% 142 29,346 s.f.16.900 s.f.14.673 s.f.8.450 s.f.13,520 s f.8.800 s.f. 29.90% o Webber Hills 2 Acres Lots (87,120 s.f.)Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Address Total Lot Buildable Area 50% HC Total Lot 50% HC Buildable Area 80% HC Buildable Area Existing HC on lot 2055 57,499 s.f.24,029 s.f.28,749 5 s.f.12,014.5 s.f.19,223.2 s.f 4,190 s.f. 7% 2065 44,319 S.f.20,625 s.f.22,159.5 s f 10,312 5 s.f.16,500 s.f.4,445.7s.f. 10% 2090 51,023 S.f.21,528 s f.25,511 5sf 10,764 s.f.17,222.4 s.f.2,962.0s.f. 5.80% 2100 47,649 S.f.20,099 s.f.23,824 5 s f.10,049.5 s.f.16.079 2 s.f.3,992.5s.f. 8.30% 2265 51,298 s.f.21,298 s.f.25,649 s.f.10,792 s.f 17,267 2 s.f,1,485 s.f. 2.80% Chippewa Lane and Turnham Road •5 acre lots (217,800 s.f.)Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Address Total Lot Bui'dable Area 50% HC Total Lot 50% HC Buildable Area 80% HC Buildable Area Existing HC on lot 4305 Chippewa La 44,700 s.f.4,900 s.f.22,350 s.f.2,450 s.f.3,920 s.f.3,621 s.f. 8% 4315 Chippewa La 44,700 S.f.4,900 s.f.22,350 S.f.2,450 s.f.3,920 s.f.4,688 s.f. 10.50% 4325 Chippewa La 45,447 s.f.5,250 s.f.22,723.5 s.f.2.625 s.f.4,200 s.f.1,918.76 s.f. 4.20% 340 Turnham Rd 45,360 s.f.6,400 S.f.22,360 S.f.3,200 s.f.5,120 s.f.1,527.32 s.f. 3.40% 380 Turnham Rd 49,981 s.f.6,280.4 S.f.24,990.7 S.f.3.140.2 s.f.5,024 32 s.f.3,157.5 s.f. 6.30% VU c *. r ly \ f \ \ i r \) r 'i ^Slfer I- iT / u a! 4i flip/’ u~ »1 1 '■!j. irnrn iT!i n:i V ■ \ •■t d ^11 , - *'H'}ii, / (■ ■I Hi ' 4,,.: im‘i /W'j } tW,i Lf i^-LUJ^A fv/ y\ -i EVtn* ’fBiifefMdU fill I," ,i:/ ^ fflWsfc v6 'H; »'f V M ‘,-,1 .1 V ^ if Fr'j.1 V. n >• I ( r>. • ^ [ |j ' 1 H, I yii ;,#fS , U 'I ^ i\ p \ V, 1\ ) lx. k •i:i:ff ' ) 1- ; x/J w /l- ./ y \ 4 /' /I ■y\ y, / <'-' s O 5) N A Properties shown in the heaviest shade of grey indicate lots less than 2 acres in size and are located outside of the Shoreland Overlay District Water elevations are based on 1997 Met Council Land Use Data and do not reflect the Ordinary High Water Level of Classified Lakes. Classified Lakes Non-ehoreland Properties Shoreland Overlay District CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR 0RI1N0 COPY MICHAEL AND THERESA ERNHART OF LCT 8 . BLOCK 3. DANIELS LONG LAKE HEIGHTS LFCAl PrSCWtPTlQN OF PRriun*^r<; r Lot 8. Block 3. OANtELS LONG I AK£ RIGHTS o ; denotes iron morker • : denotes diitonce os shown on the p4ot of DAN i£lS LONG LAKE mEKJHTS Beorings shown ore bosed upon on assumed dotum. This survey intends to show the Doundories of the obove described property. ond the k>colion of on enisting house, deck, yard born, ond btocktop driveway thereon. It does not purport to show ony other improvements or encroochments fhxkixxuj.m r !• •I I • • * ».•.* • • • • •< £\ t • "" I i MO ccpr f, •». i Plat, of Survey for.Richard W. Wacnian ^5" lijU of;Lota *11'and 12/ Block 2, Daniel's Long Lake Helghta ’Hennepin County, Minnesota ■ *. • r • ^ • *A I- f . • r i { *. . . * . is % • • r.!• • • *. • • • ♦ .• • • : :r V' ■ A'- ....... ’< <.*-rNV > ’ - K r I'l: .■ • 'Cli s ‘ j L f I • ! . ' i ’ • i. ? 11 ^" , • r *11 * ^ •); >. * *• 1 i « ' ' • * • • V* * . • / i :> k • 5• I‘-.ci 'i ' ‘ V f \M tmW S seAso'^ ■ •. ■ : ? ■• • i r • ; S y i ^ i . 4 ■ — —.;: • —- • • ............''• v;-« :\l: : ...(? _D.□ BY CTY( . SITE PLAN APPROVED APPROVED Vv D SAPPROVE ,rfj2i )F0R0N0 GRAD NG PLAN -• • }' TH REVISIONS ) ''i'vV. DA ■ •■••/! •;•'••. '..• :*.'» :•• • • ' ■ ' • • i* • ' • • .* c A, Zi ..•V t *i f ^ i N* O r».i»< .i:-;r k) <s 1 f i 1 •■ • ' .■ iki '•^■'■2d • I I :r‘ I. -il.G - : \ L- V u -t XI K •f V- • * * • * * ■ y-t. ■r-'i' ■•..- fi < LV:. !!•. •>: I ♦ .*' % M’ • ,.V ■ •■.i’-'i'i'-’r 4 • » • 'i r ‘ I r>yi- : Cartlflcate^-'of.jSurvBy i .•.' •■..*y v*d^' .•-ll'hwreby.^cftrtiry’that~thl9-*ls'a*^ ^ ^ true and correct representation of n . •■TrTsT' survey,ofj-theJbouiidarlea ;ofjI^tB 11 and 12, Block 2, Daniel's Long Lake ' Vm4#^v f • '♦ViA'.TA/'nfMAn 'a C oIi 4T .m.. 4^u and ell Burvoy Is cade * the property; J-- mortgage 'or, anyl-^** understood and.' ‘Stabllshlng lot ' •• r’-,' r vv>;-’ • ■ . • • ’'» .V ' . • ' •• • ■ • 1342 5713 r t .* •• i!v'‘|. fif ■A V'A II* * • ' ■ 1- ‘ : V’' • » ., 1 1 » ' :<V ■ 'J\l 'T*< ;Siv Denotes iron monument Denotes offset stake X 000.0 Denotes existing elev. (000.0) Denotes Proposed elev. Denotes surface drainage Proposed t^rage floor elev. Proposed lowest floor elev. - Proposed top of foundation elev. BENCH MARK: 'f{lLCi-bL\ M( CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR eiLL R. SIF0R9 IN lots 3. 4. DANIELS LONG LAKE HEIGHTS Honnepin County. HinnesotA MAPLE LANE s >crcc LU CG 0 < 1 legal oesc Tnjt par: er1/ of IT Block 3. L I hereby c prepared L ^uperVI $ Ic registere: Surveyor u of Mjnnesc coffin 1 : Hark S. Gr engineers, long Lake. Scale: 1 1 Date : Au: 0 : Ir: Bearings s assuned Ct w'llilirilrM «i»a« ORONO CDPYCERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR LARRY GLEASON OF LOT 3. BLOCK 1, DANIELS LONG LAKE HEIGHTS 0^ q: LiJ ffl o < X irCAL DfSgffPTifW OF PRTMISFS ; Lot 3. Biock 1. DAMELS LONG LAKE HEIGHTS o : donotai Iron morkar Beorings shown ore based upon on ossumcd dotunt This Survey intends to show the boundcv ’ies of the obova described property, and the location of on existing house, garage. or>d shed thereon. It does not purport to show ony other in^ovements or encrooctments. -Cl O' r \:u i I \o<=> i CERTIFICA TE OF SURVEY Prcporcd for •*PLKKY KL'SlDCNCi: I I6 0 K CO 1I ll> ^ 2« T- • J.x5X .. Os oN. s \ 11.1 r;. • '"l t A 'I^ti I . \0 I-,/!!® iim Ir6 0 K 1 LKGAL UESCRrPTION: I.OL 1, niock 2, DANIELS LONG LAKE HEIGHTS, accord.nq to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. — 100.00 - ^ CITYOFORONO SlTf PLAN__ GHADING PLAN X^lPPBOVf D2C.A2.»' '^D APPROVED WITH REVISIONS DATE^'_^^^-7_-J?.Q / •! I /o' se«T6A^'^ L^T A-/a^«^ GENERAL NOTES <: .i-.- • • I* ’ .!• • . ’•! m r I eic.6ao-aoM fai Ko 6aO-9A2a Csiabllahed In 1002 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS RECISTBRKD UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OP MINNESOTA TOOl 7Srd Av«ou« Horth UlnnMpoll*. MIotiMoU M42A &urupyors (flrrlifirntf ROGER STRAUHAN Property located In Section 36. TcMnshIp 118, Range 23. Hennepin County. Minnesota JA'/u INVOICE N5.il2!l r.B.NQ. BIB-Sa SCALE: r -__JOI n-** i II o 0«nolM kon Mofunenl n DwwIm Wood HJb Sal foe •■covoUon only Oanotoa filotaig Oavoiloo Oanolaa Prepeoad ClavoUon Oarolao St^foca Orahoga NOTL Piropoaad grodaa ora aObJact lo laaUla of aoR taalt Propoaad buBdlng hformotlon muil ba chackad vlth opprovad biAAng plan end davaiepmani or plan bafora aicavoHon qor.o jJ±^lJ_Pfopoaad Top of Btocii Proooaad Cor«iga FW 2-12lH_l7opoaad loaaat floor Trpa of BukcAng y3ALt>Ocf r ?f?V & U3 XT nnmm mnu oi5 C(MXJtur. LstutitiUifil m 10G2 LOT SURVEYS COP^PANY, INC. noo m.soH I^iVND SUUVKYOILS UKCISTKIIKU UNDER LAW3 OF STATE OF MINNESOTA ICOl • 13i(l Avenue NoiOi &CC^3093 % Mlnnee|H>ll«, MlrmeeoU &&428 , ^iinitfyura (Jlftliflrule INVOICE MQ-- 3q??S F.n >;n. 66S-77 SCALE r • ?0* srtu o Denotii Iron Monurntnl n *>notei Wood Hub Set ‘ for EiCQvQllon Onlf 1000 0 DonoUi teUllr^g Elevallon C ^ Dinolei Propoied Elevollon Uenolii Surfoct Orotnogo Fropotil Top of Block Propoitd Cofogt Floor ' Propoied loMiif Floor Typt of Building . Ct^.ocw*. SURVEY David and Jean S«hi.f---- Address: 129 Chevy Chose Drive detail b SEE detail b 0.-15 / l.io detail C ■7.95; LO PROPOSED addition • CANTILEVER fireplace iPeo io/g?3! <n oi-4 *x o ~j/ s </ (\ji:> •I. rr ►-» ^.46 »/ /O SEE detail C ' r,_ " // /<Oo<b 19.00 V SEE detail a ~-J 'BRICK P" FIREPL ACE i----------.ii. f^cra^ ^1 fence & approvfa S TT. N 87^05^51^ V —------ w. I ^ f ^ approved 0 approved V 0 DiSAPP"^ 0 •y^n •777>c ://c^z:p ® REBAR SET for BUII niNC nrrcrr DETAIL A area e; 27«^Rfi er^ house area = ^'*’-PROPOSED 2,3o0 SO. FT. ADDITION area » jog co rr .f?o\V?rT8rrEl^a^«o'oSE^DAOO^ Lot legal description V °'WAY MAAll l-”.!.4r manor . 1 SURVEY FOR: JEggY PKOULX ORONO COPY : \ ------f>0O) <^p> —■ Prepared By:162132 -OOI X □ APPROVED WITH REVISIONS □ DISAPPROVH) BY (Uj DATE S’-lfr *o\ \-ei9f cHrtse pciiy^ *Y This.drawing has been checked and Reviewed this taj- day of x^A/fi> v<pm bfr-______, 19 3 . ^AjSdzi GCHOELL & MADSON, INC. N CNOiHcens • sunvcYons • FtAiiNCns i SOIL TesTiIIQ*eNviII014 MENTAL scnviccs !•••• WAVfkfA BLVO. mihh CTO nba . mm tllAS lAiii /Aki DESCRIPTION:®8 ttfr Lot 17, Block 1, HILL O'WAY MANOR according to the recorded plat thereof. GENERAL NOTES: 1. •-Denotes iron monument found. 2. o - Denotes iron moument set. ’ CfvUL^. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared under my supervision and that I am a Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Theodore D. Kemna 'X^ Date: lo l.irnn''.f' No. 17006 o . v^ vj »‘ «/^ ;. m111! 7^ ^-, *y.j5 ; n/ ]^>>^7 A '*^1 .,— I »fe«r>t4, II L, f,*»n^.- vfi* ■'^J'®l3r‘' Hk>*;vA> V^i,u ■ I. Vf • v'iJS h:?:' i ;i V -f Wim 7 m^gTWm; • I «• aMjJf' :j m bm ^ A •• ^ tr -^9 n r~i [, r ^ «* ,'iii LJ hOKTV ’ »• U.4I1 Oi MIT I »<» • M 1.^ *t T?5 -xC'A IfCfl* / 5u imm mm*mm • ■>■1 *«A^f Hi^i u«ji ft«ai liM>«i Wuwt ■«■ •taw* Ii«^«i amm, m»% •«•■•» rw>« M»ut UMX (f>\< \ .\’^- vtt"V *» Vr^ir t» Mr UmJTXM 4 n>OM9 taOM «UVT'kfj^ ^ h^9^9T IM rat CMim. 4 m0 ti4A4tO ufMMJg »d t4r$t It n>v»« *T«ii TM«i wmwa • 1^ M« fiMi M •»..■ . ••v tmMi tJ^ »rMi:a • jg m* naut^f»0€itt/iaiattm tarm m. n. maimmrnA.xua un JS - la *i I taa . *j**j **** KxaK • !.«?* i% n A^*€^‘i>.W-T.*frafX£D Is?- tino.sr: -4^ 4A? ' *» aw* w *«to •> pfvsra.-r 'r; Hl-^c/): D .4 or a: u; cs / 9 c 5 Xf^ ? **» fi*' OS u s5 to giP Ifi i O §*hm ■UI ”1 ■■•LTTL ^ .r:r=a c?Cfe6 \\j£ih/\ Ul ULo- Ccrllficalc of Survey for Kevin M. Krueger of Lot 6. Block 2. WtBBtR HILLS Hennepin County, MlnneSQld % • « *. • * .i I •, -FOX-- STREET^ •« & r mm COPT ctnoFOW^^ Ok SITE PLAN — OPADINO PLAN □ amoved Wl^ REVISIONS =3%a / / / / / / *7 / / / / / / a v\ ^ CITYOFORONO A SITE PLAN__ GRADING PLAN MAFPRGvLO U APPPG'-cO VsT>! REVISIONS □ DiSAPP.aOV^ DATE_ t4-9.0! V K N r^r-' •'// - I -»w» CKipp^^wa. / L <xn&- 7^.2L ' ■ 1 ^ < Oc:> 6^A>o Copy ^/3/5 CJoj^ppQM^ Lo-ffVL. Certificate of Survey for Gregory J. Halldin of Lot 2, Block 1, Chippewa Hennepin County, Minnesota ,<tA- ^0^ - ^ ^ 1 hereby certify that this is a tru«-? and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 2, Block 1, Chippewa, the location of all existing buildings, if any, thereon, and the proposed location of a proposed deck. It does not purport tc show other improvements or encroachments. COFFIN & 6R0NBERG, INC. Mark S. Gronberg Lic^ No Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners Long Lake, Minnesota— {l©lG_VZIli S£P28t98T( •imi 4-395 l-eu\JL r r TOWN NORTH 140.01 ROAC \A_ <r" i I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR DOUG MERZ IN THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 31-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA N 89“33' 00" W 357.01 5 ‘ To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Hawn and Planning Commissioners Mike Gaffron. Planning Director Januar\ 1 7. 2002 #2333 - Amend Home Occupation Standards - Section 10.20, Subd. 4 Update / Request to Table to Febriiarj 19 Meeting Summary of Conclusions - December 20 .loint Work Session The consensus was to proceed with the 15-item amendment that Planning Commission recommended in 1998 (Page I of 1 1/2/01 stall memo), and incorporate the 4-item staff recommendation regarding non-resident employees, with the following revisions or e.xceptions: a) Add a line item that addresses noise impacts and limit those impacts to 8:00 a.m - 7:00 p.m. b) Need further discussion on item 5 regarding home occupation in accessors' structures (as written, only allowed in rural /ones or with rural lot si/e...) c) For item 6. need to define which "certain vehicles" are allowed to be stored outside... d) For item 7, establish a thre.shold number above which parking of vehicles associated with the home occupation must be screened. e) For item 8, consider adding a weight limit for vehicles u:ed in the business... f) For item 10. clarify that there can be no signage in relation to the home oecupation. g) For item 1 1, limit hours of operation to 8:0U a.m to 7:00 p.m. rather than 8:00 p.m. h) For item 1 2. add a limit on the number of customers or clients that can be on the site at one time. i) For item 13. consider that the normal deliver) vehicles such as l/P.S and I edl x slu>uld be allowed. It was suggested that the code amendment include an introductor)' paragraph of intent in terms of maintaining neighborhood characteristics. It w.is also suggested that language be addeil giving the City ability to further regulate or even Ibrcc the closure of any home oeeupatioi: that is found to be having negative imprets on the neighborhood. Request to Table Staff has commenced a re-draft of the amendment presented in 1998. w hich w ill incorporate the above provisions. I lowever. the re-draft is not yet complete, so further action on this item should be tabled to the Februaiy 19 meeting. TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Wendy Boltenberg, Zoning Administralor/Plamier JainiaiA 3. 2002 SURFECT:«02-2737 Charles Pyle 3548 Ivy Place ATI' Variances Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 acre) 12.225 s.r. (.28 acre) List of Exhibits A Analy sis Worksheet B Application C Site Plan/Siirsey D Description of Requcst/I lardship Statement E Hardcover Calculation Worksheets F Plat Map G Property Owner Notification List H 1992 Approved Resolution/Site Plan Pertinent Code Seetions 1. Section 10.03. Subdivision 14 (C): Structural Lot Coverage: The total combined footprint areas ofall structures shall not e.xceed 15% of the lot area. Variance request: I'o permit 2.440 s.f. (20.0%) lot coverage by structures where 1.833.75 s.f (15%) is allowed. 2. Section 10.22. Subd. 2 and Section 10.56. Subd. 16 (I,)(2): Hardcover in 0-75’: Within 75‘ of the lakeshore there shall be no hardcover. Variance Request: l o permit 761.5 s.f (18.67%) haideover where 0 s.f is allowed. 3. Section 10.22. Subd. 1 (H): Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located within 75 feet of the lakeshore. Variance Request: To permit a variance to allow structure i243 s.f) within 75' of the lakeshore. Application The applicant has requested after the fact variances to permit the replacement of an existing lakeside deck and repair a walkway. The deck and walkway is located within 75' of the lakeshore. I he deck and some boards in the walkway were old and deteriorated. U02-273" Chdrlcs I’ylv 35-*S Ivy Place /{TF I'uriances Page I In 1993, the applicant applied for a variance to add onto the residence and was approved for 2,440 s.f. (20%) lot coverage by structures on the property. At that time the patio was included in the lot coverage calculations, and hardcover in the 0-75' saw a reduction but no improvements were proposed in that zone. At that time, hardcover was proposed to be 19.7%. but was not approved at that amount. Hxisting hardcover is 734 s.f. (18.1%) and is proposed to be 761.5 s.f. (18.67%). The deck and walkway have e.xisted as is since at least 1992, as shown on the sur\ey included in the approval (I-.xhibit I). The design of the deck is an equal replacement to w hat existed. To meet todays code standards the footings were required to be raised above grade, higher than what existed, so an additional step was added. The square footage of the deck increased by approximately 30 s.f. to meet the standard. Statement of Hardship The applicant has included his .statement of hardship in l•xhibit D. The applicant should also be asked for his testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration 1 . The deck acts as a walkway from the second level of the residence to the lakeside of the property, fhe lakeside of the residence is a walkout. 2. The lot coverage by structures is not changing from the amount approved in 1993. 3. Approximately 8-10 bo irds on the walkway bas e been replaced. Staff has view ed this as a repair not replacement. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. .Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the lot ci'verage by structure aiul hardcover variances. The applicant is required to remove 177 s.f. of landscape fabric under rock. U02-2737 Charles Pyle }54S Ivy Place ATF I’ariances Pane 2 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area LR-IC Lot Area Required 21,780 s.f. (.5 acre) Actual 12.225 .s.f. (.28 acre) Lot Coverage bv Structures Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 12,225 s.f.E.xisting: 2,440 s.f Proposed; 2,440 s.f (Approved in 1993) 2('/ . No Change Hardcover Calculations Distance from Total area in Allowed Existing Proposed shoreline setback hardcover Hardcover Hardcover 0-75'4.075 s.f 0 s.f 734 s.f *761.5 s.f (0%)(18.1%)(18.67%) * Does not include 177 s.f. of non-conforming rock and plastic which must be removed. 6 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Application U Ol" (^"13 7 Date Recehed /P - ~01 Amount Paid 'SiQ^O.OO PROPERTY INFORMATION . Site Address J ')'V x' ^ ^ '/C i - I'~lProperty Identification Number'tP.I.D.)_ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired______________________________ I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: V residential ___other (specify) Zoning District:__________________________ (month/year) APPLICANT y ^ ^ Name • {U.‘ J I i L. Address: /I OWNER (if different than applicant) Name _ Address:J' Phone (home) ji- *~/-// -SVvZ-- ____ Phone (work) A /'z ■ / • v<l /-/ City: _________Zip: Phone (home)_________________ ____ Phone (work)___________ City:Zip: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ^ Estimated Construction Cost S Describe request in detail: l ^ . ^ ---------------------------/ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Averaiie Lakeshore _ Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: _______ (attach additional sheets if necessary) #2737 2> 8 ji/y p//)c£^c <r imfLOV^ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR Lvc*-*c_;> ‘v^ CHARLES PYLE OF LOT 174, TAYLOR’S SUBDIVISION OF SPRING PARK LOTS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I vr Vv:T c A -5^ \ •• Eti^'^iNO Ho«J^£ m :4r 'ir 3-' V M mM m • $ J *> < > * •.' - • N tr • • f ^^r.AL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED /> «*• « .1 ■i JU^__« ?1 - Ta^MlAr » c I Of SflMnQ P^rk iQll Paul Weinberger City Council of Orono This fall, of 2001, Charlie and I decided to have our existing decks, which were approximately 17 years old, repaired because many boards were rotting out. There were places where the boards had rotted to the degree that there were large holes in some of the decking boards. We were concerned that visitors to our home could be hurt when walking over our deck areas that led to the lake. Since we were replacing existing decking we did not believe that we needed to apply for a variance. We hired a contractor to repair and replace some of the boards. When they began to make repairs they found more and more damaged wood, as well as rotted railroad ties that had been used for decking support. In some places, they found more than one level of ties used for support. Their decision was to make some removal changes, and we agreed . It was necessary to take out the old, rotted railroad ties, which ended up to be a total of twenty. The contractor informed us, that according to code, they could not replace similar decking supports because the railroad supports had been set Into the ground, below grade level. We were also told, that according to code, they would need to provide proper foundational support and that code specified frost footings and posts. They would need to raise the height of the existing deck sections so they would be above grade level. Consequently, we would also need two more steps built than we originally had to accommodate the raised sections. We started out with a project that seemed simple to resolve, but turned out to be far more complex and costly than anticipated. Sincerely, Charles and Shirley Pyle — •% Jl ' * • ■ L setback ZONE; 'VOR»'SHEET fv.otik,^ .. '^-250' .50-500’ A. House 500-1000’ /a Length B. Garage C. Driveway X X X Width S.F. D. Sidewalk Cic^rl lldCi E- Patio^eck F. Landscapi*’''^^ 9/ Underlain** By Plasti4^f^><~y 2 it G. ^er, ‘ X X X X X X X X X _S.F. _ S.F. _ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. C'l . 53 . •! A A “^^COVER IN ZONE property area in zone -----B—----------------- B \ yOPOSEP HARprrnxBJJlZONf, A. House /f\ l-engih X 100 X 100 —S.F S.F. -—S.F. S.F.c/ S F S.F• • • S.F. yp^'/S F S.F. S.F. -L»<> :9Tc<-^ Hi. B. Garage C. Driveway X X X WidiJi /•£ s: as D. Sidewalk t.6 tx-gC^ X X X X _ S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. E. Patio'Deck /.y ■i. ) F. Landscape .3^^S / Underlain ✓vIT^vji By Plastic^ ' G. Other X X X X X /y ~y/c '/Z- £ a ,.6-; /V c / total hardcover in zone ■^^'^-^^fROPERTY’ area in zone ,/ ~ • ^ I ^ R ^\y / # Q Tf S / 9c/y X 100 --7-'-X S . S.F. . S.F. . S F. , S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. A B SETBACK ZONE: ( 75-25^) >50-500' jpUSTING hardcover |[o A. House *7 M 500-1000' JJAl X X X Width B. Garage C. Driveway Cl>/ O. Sidewalk «r ..^2. ;?y. z E. Patio/Deck U. ~ ■ I »Z— F. LandscapV ^ Underlain X X X X X X X X X L _yc‘c G. -GtWr A .Ct /.!^W .7 A A TOTAL hardcover IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE --------^ B ^QPQSED HARprovFp; IJV y;/i|vyf; X 100 X 100 Length B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X Width X X X X X X X X X 4i_B B r total hardcover in zone total property area in zone -----------------__ + B JJr*4 / • • __ X 100 t t J • bV - - » £c ^4^ >~C //.V _ S.F. - S.F. S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. SF. SF. S.F. A S.F. B % . S.F. . S.F. . S.F. . S F. S.F. S.F. S.F. . S.F. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. A B % Hennepin County Taxpayer^ /^'>'V*C DOC wHCu, ^\ 2.0'//7-a3*<2^ *• " #-A * J /;W ____•.^y &Parcel Information';^ • ’ -' * ^ . J Wv Parcel ID 201172^2^^ House Number 3548^f.>^^ Street Name IVY TNs Is not a legally recorded map. It represents a rximpila^ and data from Crty, County, and Stale road atrihotkies and g i:'.fc ^ r,.- . Jot mm DME 11/13/01 BATCH 502 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADOR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 36 20-117-23 <i2 0001 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED S L KAPLAN ET AL TRUSTEES JAHES W LUPIENT 7100 WAYZATA BLVD HPLS HN 55^26 36 20-117-23 (kZ 0017 035^*6 IVY PL CIS PYLE CHARLES D PYLE 35^6 IVY PLACE WAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 ^2 0027 03560 IVY PL G A CHRISTENSEN ET AL GARY A t LYNN A CHRISTENSEN 3560 IVY PL WAYZATA HN 55391 HENtlEPIN COUtITY PROPERTY 1NFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 20-117-23 62 0C06 00036 ADDRESS UNASSIGHED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND NOT FOR SALE/UNDER WATER IN LAKE HTKA 38 20-117-23 62 0018 03566 IVY PL A H JEWETT ETAL ARTHUR H JEWETT 3566 IVY PL WAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 62 0036 03565 IVY PL JEFFREY t DEBRA DANBERRY JEFFREY I DEBRA DANBERRY 3565 IVY PL WAYZATA HN 55391 REPORT NO. PI635601 PAGE 10 38 20-117-23 62 0016 03550 IVY PL WH t J DAHPIER WILLIAH S DAHPIER 3550 IVY PLACE WAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 62 0019 03536 IVY PL TED 8 NANCY CAPRA TED CAPRA 1986 EDGEWATER AVE ARDEN HILLS HN 55112 TOTAL BATCH 502 ooooa CV^ ci O I CERTIFV THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE CT" 6191496 -H CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL cs c\ NO. ■ A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONESG CODE SECTIONS 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C); 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2; .\ND 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) FILE mn N VMIEREAS, Charles D. Pyle and Shirley Pyle (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 3548 Ivy Place within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 174, Taylor’s Subdivision of Spring Park Lots, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) to permit structural improvements to the property that will result in 2,440 s.f. or 20.0% lot coverage by structures where only 15% is allowed, and a variance to Section iO.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) seeking approval of hardcover variances within 75-250’ setback area where only 25 % hardcover is allowed and where 4,742 s.f. or 58.2% hardcover is proposed and where 5,870 s.f. or 72% e.\ists on the property. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File )^1878. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC. Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 21,780 s.f. or 0.5 acres in area. The subject property contains 12,225 s.f. or 0.28 acres. TRANSF5-S CMTijUSD 0E?T cf p (t '■uCLieiuccfiDs Page 1 of 6 NOV 80 1993 r N county VINN -ic-Btnrrr t^ CITY of ORONO RESOLLTIO.N OF THE Cm’ COITVCIL NO. - 3. 4. 5. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 18, 1993, and recommended approval of the proposed variance application as amended based upon the following findings: A.The proposed improvements to the propertv- result in a reduction of hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone from 27>.7>% to 19.75^, although no improvements are proposed in that zone. Further hardcover in the 75- 250 ’ zone will be reduced from the current level of 72% down to 58.2%, a reduction of approximately 1,128 s.f. hardcover. B.Based on the existing drainage patterns of the property, runoff produced from the structures placed within the 75-250 ’ setback area will not drain directly to the lake but will drain to the street which drains directly to the lake, hence the proposed hardcover reductions in the 75-250 ’ zone are desirable. C.No major land alterations are proposed as a result of the structural improvements. D.The increase in lot coverage by structures is not incongruous with the basic development pattern of the immediate neighborhood. The current variance request is a revision of Application iir 1750/Resolution #3183 which included the family room addition and relocation/construction of a new detached garage. The garage is no longer a pan of the proposal. Tlie City Council finds that the conditions existing on this propeny are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zo.ning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serv'e as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 6 -fl' CITY of ORONO RESOLimON OF THE CITY’ COUNCIL NO. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, repons by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, OUUJ.ft AXD rONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C); 10.22, Subdivision 2; and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) to permit the construction of a 381 s.f. addition to the residence and covered entry of appro.ximately 249 s.f. in area, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot coverage by structures on the property shall be limited to 20.05c of the lot area. 2. Upon application for a building permit, applicants shall complete the following: A. Show all e.xisting and proposed improvements on a copy of the certificate of survey. B. Provide detailed grading and drainage plan. 3. All hardcover scheduled for removal on the propeny as shown on page 6 of this resolution shall be removed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. The owner and future owners of the propeny are advised that any future proposals to add hardcover on the property will require prior City approval, and might be approved only in conjunction with concurrent hardcover removals, resulting in no net hardcover increase. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit v/ithin one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will e.xpire on that date (November 8, 1994). Page 3 of 6 -/4 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITk COUNCIL O I ) NO. ________ 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their .heirs, successors a.nd assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 8th day of November. 1993. ATTEST: or6thy M.(Hal in. City Clerk Property O^tTrl STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of November, 1993, by Edward J. Callahan. Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument w.as e.xecuted on behalf of the City. . /?/ Notary PublicCAROLE A. HASEMAN NOTARY PU8LC-yM*£SOTA HENNEPIN CCXINTY uv CCU'I'ZS CN Page 4 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. •- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this % day of _______. 199^ before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared _marr/f-tC __________________________________ known to me to be the person(s) described inf^and'^who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. \'t} :.i\r \ s. \nr E'OTA h • ...I’IN COuriTY V;. c-;a. 3-i:.99 >/\c J //. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) , 1993 before me a Notary Public within and for “T- : ^ ' On this l!>^ day of ^her_______ said county, personally appeared Ohadrf huU.J^' . n-,an',-,-c/__________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who ex *cuted die foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. - I- LISDA S. VEE t.OTAOY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA HCMNEPIN CC'JNTY Vy cc-'f* 15-1 expert's 9-12-96 NOTARY PU.UUC Page 5 of 6 tw%Vn>^>wm •• • . • a j ) ) h H fif r—° (eA*/cm Ho/>g>- ts^ . • V* 'v*- ^•^■iD •' ; : V :•.i . .'Tv:* • . . .;■ iVMivJsi • _\. vh'ie^fthi (bot> 0 . - fW4l« (•0/iamO ^ (iufrvrrji/nis «ew AAwot) . ■ * ^* • I Its ' '•■■^ . ~ ~ 5ok/ti>7V ^ »>^v.i.* - ■ -... - - ■ -. . .*■ < . ‘r' v. •;‘ ^.' >, • i; .’^ .« . 1 'vr |iiw»r V ‘ •2" ^^I>rtv:»i ee’j’AJp if.t-VtCii.-* f /tye ( KfCW KPnW ) .:^fbf+Vf T^» it)'^loevKB ____ -15' ur^rMCC evt^j> ,.i w/ \,¥»cWtP (C^l/ltJCH ^ If; L; (y«ofoj«> H/^uvCf fei\xK}Qt^ p -15)' ^cttx^ /‘fejK - rtt4ilC Pf* f/?’ lipO ^ - <3f® PFiOC <J> ' pevctP ppfitvJ t)f» \ fir -yi& •!> - ptvc.^ f/r fl KWfHvft/r-wpc: m u> 1 • < 1 ^01 —e==^fflj-<cd gU>Jp<TV)tO 0 yo'b^ I? C)gjrv\ f'^i/C ^ieup«ngt»J - f^nKii^ W /frnTV W,VM /K 4Tn&(UtVf^^ - lW<iT& Al^rn^UlMx tt>t^t> pf= c’noe'A/^y ', - itvjc<'- c-*jrf-y t.x»t):v_' To *T_______________________ 6A^f^ Miy -K¥ It/Kyi1<» - ptu^-e i?uij» of ^mp6ia/n^ e- u\:C*<‘P feKiV^'C* gj^i^fi^l’Wug) fVfel/-^ , mnI l"-j ‘ ^ J ^ y , MtJ Fej»yeO *o on" ■‘^1)/Ifr/^CA^TS ^/A/A<- -fO P. C ' 7 TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Wendy Bottenberg. Zoning Administrator/PIanncr Januaiy 8, 2002 SUBJECT: #02-2738 G & G Holding Co. 1170 Loma Linda Avenue ATF Variances -- Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (I acre) 13.144 s.f. (.3 acres) List of Exhibits A Analysis Worksheet B Application C Survey D Description/ 1 lardship Statement E Photos of Property F Hardcover Calculations G Pennit Issued H Variance granted in 1978 I Plat M ip J Property Owner ’s List Application Summary: The applicants arc requesting al\>. •: One fact variances to replace a lakeside porch to the same footprint that e.xisted. The porch wa;, built in 1978 and the wood was rotting on the rool'. And some maintenance work needed to be done. A permit was obtained from the city. During the process of the maintenance work and roof repair it was found that the floor of the porch was al.st) rotten, fhis necessitated removing the roof and floor of the porch. In 1978 a variance was granted to enclose an existing concrete patio on the lakeside of the residence. The location encroached into the 75' lakeshore setback and into the side yard setback. The plan approved is the same as what is being proposed today. The footprint, hardcover, roof height or lot coverage by structures is NO'f changing from what existed and was approved in 1978. Pertinent Code Section: 1. Section 10.24. Subd. 5 (B): Side ^'ard .Setback: The following minimum requirements shall be observed for LR-1 B district- 10 feet. Variance Request: fo permit a variance to allow the porch to be 2.7' from the side lot line where 10' is required. 2. Section 10.03, Subd. 1(B): Average Lakeshore Setback. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. Variance Request. To permit a variance to encroach 67' into the average lakeshore setback. M2-273S G & G Holding Co 1170 Loma Linda ATF Variances 1/8/2002 Page / 3. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 1 6(L)(1): Hardcover in 0-75': Wi.hin 75'of the lakeshore there shall be no hardcover. Variance Request: To permit 297.2 s.f. (7.5%) hardcover where 0 s.f. is allowed. 4. Section 10.22, Subd.2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(2): Hardcover In 75-250':Within 75-250 ’ of the lakeshore there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. Variance Request: To permit 2,351.67 s.f. (25.6%) hardcover where 2,292.38 s.f. (25%) is allowed. 5. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B): Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessor)’ structure shall be located w ithin 75 feet of the lakeshore. Variance Request: To permit a variance to allow a portion of the residence footprint (8 s.f.) to be w ithin 75' ol the lakeshore. Statement of Hardsliin: The applicant has included his statement of hardship in Hxhihit D. '1 he applicant should also be asked for his testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Con sideration : 1. A variance was granted in 1978 to permit the porch to be enclosed, requiring same variances. 2. The residence is lower than the adjacent residences and views will not be affected. 3. The footprint, hardcover, roof height or lot coverage by structures is NOT changing fri>ni what existed and was approved in 1978. 4. Hardcover in 75*250' /one is slightly over the allowed amount, should applicant remove a small portion of the dri\cway to meet the standard'.’ 5. O er issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Kecuiiiiiicndation: Stall’recommends approval of the reque.sted variances. it02-2~JS Cl A ii Holding Co irc Loma Linda Ave A TF Variances I/S/2002 Page 2 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LR-IB Lot Area Required ’ Acre Actual .3 Acres Hardcover Calculalions Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardco\er L.xi sting Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0-75’3975 s.f.0 s.f. t0%) 297.2 s.f. (7.5%) 297.2 s.f. (7.5%) No Change 75-250’9169.5 s.f.2,292.38 s.f. (25%) 2.351.67 s.f. (23.6%) 2,351.67 s.f (25.6%) No C'hange Strucfural Coverag e Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Pcrcentauc 13,144 s.f Allowed; 1.971.60 s.f 15.0% (•'.xisting; 1.617.87 s.f 12..3% Proposed; 1.617.87 s.f 12.3% B CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) AppIicaHon U ^ ^ Date Received/ 2 -1 S • 0 / lid 4S(Amount Paid SSO^ PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address //7c? ^en>%4K /4i^enuj^ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 08-117-23-23-0015 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired n<»rpmhpr I (do) (dofiot) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: __residential ____other (specify) .(month/year) Zoning District: t. g - 1 R seasonal APPLICANT Name vintage Builders Inc. Phone (home) Address: 13005 55th Ave. N. _____ Phone (work) 763-559-4815 City: Plymouth MN zip: 55442 OWNER (if different than applicant) Luella G Goldberfhone (home) 952-941-2624 (day/evening) Name G&G Holding Co. Ltd Partnership______ Phone £«5EJe) 952-941-2640 Address:_jQ]^9 jupa. Drive_______________City: ____________Zip 55439-1643 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 2,500.00 Describe request in detail: variances as listed below to repair to keep in exactly the same dimensions as have existed since 1978. (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: ___Lot Width Front X Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSIIIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance witli Zoning Code requirements: variance request is simply to replace and repair rotten wood on existing cottage porch to replace exactly as It----- has existed since 1978. ~ " ^- - --- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - (attach additional sheets if necessary) See additional letter from Luella Goldberg. .7 . *. 6 o L.UELL.A G. G oldberg 7019 TUPA DRIVE MINNKAPOUS. MIWr'fESOTA 9S4391043 TED: *99S> 941-2624 FAX: «»S2> 941 2040 Vece^nbii*' 17, 2001 Theycotta^'Cit'1170 LcnncvLiyida/AveniA^hxi^ &iUited/UvCti' }ne^e^f6rmii¥UXyl978. Weyh^eyWi/ed/iAvtl^ cotta^ next cLoty>- for o\/er thirty yea^^y, andy p urcha^dy 1170 in'1986. Currently, they roof yti'ucture needed/ repair and/ oy permCt way obtainedy fot' roof replacetnent and/ mcUnte^/xavxce repair worlo. X)urin^ thiy proceyy, itway diicoveredy that the flotyr of the porch/that had/ exlyted/ there iivice 1978 way rotten/. The floxyr it^icture needed to- he replaced for yxfety rea^ony. Our children/ and g^'ondchildren/ liye in/ they cottage during the sumtner, and we did not feel/we could leaye a rotten/floor itk'ucture Cn/place. We felt it would he a real/ safety ha/^rd. The yariance recjuest to replace the rotten/porcly floot' ytructure with new hofe lyoardy that will matcly the footprint of theporch/, oi it e^Hted since 1978. Iry all/of the repair worhory they cottage, we have beery eatreinely carefid to adhere eyactiy to the footprint of the cottage, as it currently eyest},'. There will he no inct'ea/je iry footprint, hardcover, ot' roof height anywhere—ordy iti'uctural safety improvements'. Our family hay enjoyed and appreciated thiy heautvful part of Lake M CnnetOixko/ fen' over thirty yeary beginning' when/ out' childt'ery wet'e very yc i yng-. Now, we warvt the cottage that our children/ and grandchildretv use to he fl,ivyctXo,\al atxd safe. Without the var'iance to replace the porch/ floor, a safe and livable space wdl' not be there. Tl\ar\k/yoa for your considcr'ation>. Sincet'ely, 4JC^arCckJs-^-J^ LicelXa/Q. Qcldherg V) 1 ' 77 (j %«...■ -1^ -w^Emm / /m '< ’ * / * / ' : f ^ l * U'<0 ’t , Pit* m;^p: ’i'*-' ' fv' ^ QrA£v« V ' 4-i i V w i.T TWi;Si5"' m !;■ ■ ’ \ ^ • .* mM- H ■•'* * i?^'1*4laK3r ^' i. ''■ t w^.'i • ; Jijrtjno " ' .?•>•»•;■ ;i: #J Ttiis^ ililiiiillim t' •' •• ^^.-1hr':, r ■‘^ V ■ '<•" ‘ . <i ^ ' '> J.‘* t ^ -..■■>rv; f <^ ' i > ' ^ # *i • **.l• • 1 ‘ J « * •» i-vV'' ’■ ■ '^*'*' ••"'/'j ,i' 1^ »* ** f ^’» s '•iff' . f'«' < •. •) • - .,j »- -hw I ^^ *1 •« N HAl COVER.€ALCULATION WORK. .£ET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) (j)-7?^ 75-250* . 250-500' existinc hardcover in zone 500-1000' A. House X ■f Length ^H.\ B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X Width rt.o X X X X X X X X X s 39 S3 as * A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE _ _ _ - D " B X 100 X 100 S3 as PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X Length Width X X X B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Dcck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X A ^ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE p ^ '*•>5 j i! 7 A . / .. •'i ' ‘I.• • ^'r~X 100 A )oo-C ‘ 4 •.< S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.P. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. A S.F. B % N ha : cover calcul SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. Hoi'jc X 75-250' WORK *EET • • 250-500'500-1000 ’ Length S.F. Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. 4^atio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X 1C . L mft.CoT S.F. __________S.F. S.F. SSC3 /otr- A A TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - B 4._r3.s^(oi B X 100 *» X 100 « PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X Length Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Dcck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. SF ______________S.F. _______________________% -grv. nx % k>-> Clvk<w.c^ S.F. ______________S F. _______________SF. ^ S.F. A- TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE + B X 100 - . • ; •»r7M ^ f .* r- 9 • O * • V ( S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % A -- B >S* /i A B 12 ^1- PERMITCffV OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway - PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • 1 \ i(\ T r A..^ V fr Permit Number; Permit Type: P04505 Minor Alterations 1 1/7/200 1 SITE ADDRESS: PID: 08-117.23-23-0015 1170 Loma Linda Ave Mound. MN 55364 DESCRIPTION: Proposed Use: Permit Class: Permit Type: Residential Building Minor Alterations UOif UBC Occupancy R3 Census Code O/S - Building Permit Sub-type(s): Building - Re-Roof DETAILS: Approved per resolution U\ Separate permits required:Eiectrical (spec) NOTICES/REMARKS: FEE SUMMARY:Permit Fee:$ 951.75 Valuation: $ 93,570.00 State Surcharge Fee: $ 46.80 TOTAL FEE:S 998.55 APPLICANT:Vintage b ildcrs Inc. 13005 55th Avenue N Plymouth, MN 55442 OWNER: ^ Holding Co. Ltd Pa.n;:ership 1140 Loma Linda Ave Mound MN 55364 the undersigned hereby requests permission to make the REALIMPROVEMENIS SPEC IMED and AGREES TO DO ALL WORK IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH ALL Cl iT OF ORONO ORDINANCES AND STATE OF MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENl S applicant phrmitee signature \P'' ISSUED BY SIGN,•.nmE Cpoies: \-fi\t(SienituTej Reauindi. l-AoolicanL I-MonthN Renorts. I-Ass»sine. 1-Finance Page I 0- S-'r if I- ■^' * >?* ■/* W 1% ■ •Tl . *■? i; :l L«^Hr§1 -•vv<3 '‘w. ' '■ ■ '> •v';/ i >•'• • V.^ tv.-h' ?■ ■ T ■ ->,V -'• 1 ■ • • A '/'••r- / ;-V, ; / ^ ' -'.‘J- Ja / ‘ 'c V'- flT. '■.». , . / • • -• - . wv. ' , "''4 : ''^l • ■ ^^JV^•^.^'j^- . '; • .v: .-Xl > .; <• ^ 1 \ . ••’,'* 'Y'.J • r * / A* ;t4jl WMm&cm^, '■tjfjKi* k'l.'^‘■^/. VA '^:' ‘./ ^ ■Wtiis^SIIIlL^.A County Taxpayer Services^ V i' » ' . ! i # Okl <C t cn* ‘258 4 PJ7- I rs or 30 (23)r*" n 142 11 ^ 27 ^26 ft > ^ * A# » ^ 40 ‘i 50' , ( 1 7 7 50 \ 50 (22) so 40 V % 9 m (19.(201 \ V 1^20 21 22 23 5 24 75*;- 40 1 50 i 4 50 i ( 50 (2i) 40 (61) (62) LOMA LI 40 50 f 60 8 ^26; 1 ^>/ If • 140 5 '«N( rVeJ *n JO «s*r 1 o «• ■ J>2) ! ^so 3 . 8 ■098 7 55 rej O f9, » 203 (10)’ «/ »70S , / \(11)^/ w 293 14 283 (14) 48ro4i5 ’e loma vall sy 325 44 9 ___1 ^ 1 1V s; ’\ Ni 1 (67) ^ \ ^Of' f ^ (68) \ ^ ’ S69*04'15-W 19Z92 .X i 31 S09*04/5*W ^ '■s « 107 23 \LOMA LIND/TaV^_J m 15)^0 !4$ p 77W) 230 U6) 214 374^ 175 165 (91P 2^-xr'v ' 9 Y iJ.- —: ..) \ /ooi ^ 8 • ‘7 « (8)T u.^ \ z \m^ \ 8 ^ *-f vr145 " m 7) cH d fc»“ ‘ V ‘v * *' 4*4UT TI • \ • t . 7 ParceUnformation - <5'(W Parcel ID 0811723230015^*^ ‘-T^ - r »House Number 1170 Street Name LOMA LINDA'AVE?>^. TNs is ne t a legally recorded map. It represents a compilatKyfr^Jntornw^ti] end data from City, County, and State road authorities and other RUN DATE 12/lO/OX BATCH 505 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI^35^01 PAGE a PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 0012 011^5 LOHA LINDA AVE JEFFERY D JOHNSON ETAL JEFF D JOHNSON 11^5 LOHA LINDA AV MOUND MN 5536^ 38 07-117-23 0013 01155 LOMA LINDA AVE EUGENE CEYEN ETAL EUGENE A CEYEN 1155 LOMA LINDA AVE MOUND MN 553t<i 38 07-117-23 0068 01185 LOMA LINDA AVE D B t M J SAMS DOUG t MARY SAMS 1185 LOMA LINDA AVE MOUND MN 5556A PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 08-117-23 23 0002 01180 LOHA LINDA AVE MATTHEW H BURNS MATTHEW M BURNS 1180 LOHA LINDA AVE MOUND MN 5536<i 38 08-117-23 23 0003 01190 LOMA LINDA AVE M A 1 E C MITCHELL MARK A/ELIZADETH C MITCHELL 1190 LOMA LINDA AVE MOUND MN 55369 38 08-117-23 23 0012 01130 LOMA LINDA AVE W H BOCKMANN I N L BOCKMANN WILLIAM I NANCY BOCKMANN 1130 LOMA LINDA AV MOUND MN 55369 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 08-117-23 23 0013 01190 LOHA LINDA AVE GIG HOLDING CO LTD PTNRSHP GIG MOLDING CO LTD PTNRSHP C/O LUELLA GOLDBERG 7019 TUPA DR EDINA HN 55939 38 08-117-23 23 0019 01160 LOHA LINDA AVE G t G HOLDING CO LTD PTNRSHP GIG HOLDING CO LTD PTNRSHP C/O LUELLA GOLDBERG 7019 TUPA DR EDINA MN 55939 38 08-117-23 23 0015 01170 LOMA LINDA AVE GIG HOLDING CO LTD PTNRSHP GIG HOLDING CO LTD PTNRSHP 7019 TUPA DR EDINA HN 55939 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 08-117-23 23 0018 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 08-117-23 23 0026 01122 LOHA LINDA AVE C t G HOLDING CO LTD PTRSHP G t G HOLDING CO LTD PTRSHP C/O LUELLA GOLDBERG 7019 TUPA DR EDINA HN 55939 38 08-117-23 23 0027 01200 LOHA LINDA AVE EOHUND GRIFFIN £T AL DONALD R UDELL 1210 LOMA LINDA AVE HOUND MN 55369 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR TOTAL BATCH 503 00012 a V ■ f > ■ N V-n..*' ' TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse. City Administrator Wendy Hottenbe'g. Zoning Administralor/Planner January 3. 2002 t<Q|-273y I homas and Mary Dalilquist 4070 Dahl Road Variance •• Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: List of Exhibits LR-IB One Family Lakeshore Residential District (I acre) 42.742 s.f. (.98 acres) A U C D E F G H I Analysis Worksheet Application Survey/Site Plan Sketch of Plan Hardcover Calculations Permit issued for shed and deck repairs Adjacent neighbor ’s letter Plat Map Property Owner ’s List Pertinent Code Section I. Section 10.22. Suhd. 2: Hardcover in 75-250': Within 75-250'ofthc lakcsiunc there shall be no greater than 25‘’/b hardcover. Varitince Request: l o permit 5.545.01 s.f. (27.9*^0) hardcover where 4.966.25 s.f (25‘'b) is allowed. Application Summary: The applicants are proposing lo extend the existing lakeside deck at the northwest corner of the residence by T and construct a 3 '/j x 25' walkway that would connect the lakeside deck to a small deck (existing doorway from residence) on the west side. 1 he extension and walkway is a total of 165 s.f. This extension will prov ide wheelchair accessabilily to the lakeside deck from inside the residence. The interior of the residence has a step that one must go down in order to access the lakeside deck. The applicants mother-in-law lives with them and is in a wheel chair. In June 2001 the applicants applied for and received a permit to repair the existing lakeside deck and to construct a shed on the rear of the property. W hen the shed was built it was believed to be 10’ oil the property line. When the survey was completed for the deck addition, it was found to be T and 8.9' from the property line. A 120 s.f shed needs to be setback 10' from the property line. The residence was built in 1972. It was built to the standaids at that time and has not been added on to. U02-2^SS> Thomat and Mary Ann Dahlquist 4070 Dahl Road yariance 1/3/2002 Pane / Statement of Hardship Tlie applicants should be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration 1. The proposed residence meets the allowed 15% lot coverage by structure. 2. Is there any hardcover in the 75-250' setback area that the applicant can remove to conform to the 25% standard? 1 he turn around adjacent to the residence is needed, it would be diiTicult to back out and turn onto Dahl Road. 3. Should the shed be moved to conform to 1 O' yard setback? 4. Does Planning Commission have any additional issues or concerns with this proposal? Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the hardcover variance and moving the shed to meet the 10* yard setback, subject to removal of 1462 s.f of non-conforming plastic rock bed underlayment in the 75- 250' zone. U0!’2~39 Thomas and Mary Ann Dahlquiu 4070 Dahl Road Variance 2/3/2002 Pane 2 A ANALYSIS LR-IB Lot Area Required 1 Acre Actual .98 Acres Hardcover Calculations Distance from shoreline Total area in setback Allowed hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 0-75'12,778 s.f.Os.f. (0%) 256 s.f (2%) 256 s.f (2%) No Change 75-250*19.865 s.f.4.966.25 s.f. (25%) 5,379 s.f* (27.1%) 5.545.69 s.f (27.9%) 250-500'10.099 s.f.3,029.7 s.f. (30%) 1.588 s.f (15.7%) 1.588 s.f (15.7%) No Change Does not include 1462 s.l'. of non-conlbmiing rock and plastic which must be removed. Structural Coverage Total Lot Si/e Total Structural Coverage Percentage 42,742 s.f Allowed: 6.411 s.f 15% Existing: 2,789.5 s.f 6.5% Proposed: 2.954.5 s.f 6.9% 5 Application U Date Received /Jl~ ~Q ! Amount Paid 'JPoi5<^, CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address_ VO 7^ Of^O^d Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) / ^C>7 Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property i*in~|iiiird I (do) noj ) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: residential ___other (specify) Zoning District:___________________________________ (month/ycar) APPLICANT Name 'Tt/i-'fC* y- Address:— -T City: Phone (home) 7P 30fO Phone (work) 9$:) u 7 6 3h^/ _______________Zip:________ 0\V'NER (if different than applicant) Name _____________________ Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:.Zip:. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST , ^ Estimated Construction Cost $ 7000, 00______ Describe reqijest in detail: 7' 'h. ^ /'*v U/l! h. Cv^lfiool “k tsHev- <P<?ck Old a (attach additional sheets ifV.ecessaiy)^^ o(PS ‘^e\~ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardcover Rear Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) ILARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF LtNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance v,ith Zoning Code requirements:_____________________________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) M •V ; REQUIRED SUDMITTALS AM. of.iQS-*-nXQOnation_piust be submitted bv tlic npj)Ijcatipn deadline date in order for voiir application to be consicirred complete: ~ 1. 0 3. A. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Property Oumers List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Go\i Center, 348-5910). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8!4" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (e.xisting and proposed elevations) if any changes in c.xisting grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8'/>" .x* 11" for reproduction Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy Ski" x 11"). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with* an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owmer(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your >lQrjiiriCC-npp!icaliiLn Js.not complete if the nhove inforniation has not been includcd. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and^certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of hialier knowled^’e. OWNER’S SIG.NATURE / The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staft, consultants, agents. Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation^nd verification of this request. A___.Date /^//nO/Owner’s Signature Applicant must have all submittals into the City ^fice§ 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Plannin'’ Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Ruilding & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. tiuiimng ■1 ? < iT. i', tr FOUND IRON- AREA or rock AW STEPS TOTAl HARO c 6^r ”a^** total property area TOTATPM^TAa ’of’haro COVER OK THE PROPERTY IS 2 5fe7(r sW-IST FOUND IRON DAHL ROAD The Home Depot #2806 5800 CEDAR LAKE RD, Wed May 23 20:47:52 2001 The materials in this deck will cost $2345.93 File saved as: f:\dn\decks\523023D5.DEK 3D View LOUIS PARK, MN 554 b .7 6u-' ■ .j- The Home Depox: if^tsuOf oeuu Jaiira:, ku, Wed May 23 20:49:40 001 File saved as: f:\dn\decks\523023D5.DEK Deck Layout CsX XiUUJ.£> , £UN 304 ’ :) 3 * *. ^ •* iJ i-' •' ^ li -■■:»'-‘i j) I • «Tk v_ •3 ------------> / \v T TTt f i I ! * ^ i f I I T I I A » Cx 4 o'y^^90^ -Lf^j I • T T T * } I I I i r 1 r I hardcover CALCULATIQI^ORKSIIEET SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75* 250-500’ r.XTSTlNG HARDCOVER IN ZONE 500-1000' A. House u>l- 5 Ijeoftii /5 VtdJi X X X /7 B. ‘Gerese C. Driveway D. Sidewalk ckfO E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric »3 ¥// X X X X X X X X X 2 7^ /a V G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - A _____ B 1^ fPOPOSEP HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _______________ Lcosth Widi B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Pacio/Dick X X X F. Landscape __ Underlain __ By Plastic __ Or Fabric X X X X X X X X X • • G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE v ^ B X100 S.F. ICf.S.F. • e=S.F. =S.F. • . vs 5^h'6n S.F. • • • •• • iono S.F. S.F. . „S.F. • 77. J-.S.F. « ^rT(r t46tO S.F. S.F. J n S.F. B S.F. S.F. • a S.F. <3yfi :V /S.F. S.F. xlOO -■•'71 <1 % r ' S3 S.F. /^iCr S.F. ts S.F. c=_S.F. S3 S.F. C3 S.F. B S.F. S.F. -»• •• '77 -7-S.F. B3 • S.F. S.F. A B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % • • ?/V.hardcover calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE; (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75’ 75-230’ ^.50-500'^ f YTSTTNG HARDCOVER IN ZONE 500-1000' ^ ! A. House Leox^h VTidih X X X •• • % \ B. -ea zge C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Undeclaln By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other /OJ q-X X X X X X X X X lLr5 • S3 S3 TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ,r ts/'V ^______________ -5- B lO,PO^i X100 * • * ■ PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Leog'Ji X X X B. Oflwse- C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric 10.'I Oi. 1 X X X X X X X X X rs n S3 S3 G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - A _ _ _ _ _ __ + B xlCO \<^h fQZl ir i5- ‘I II rl'^n I - • f ' S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. I'-Ko'i' S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.E- S.E- fo CITY OF ORONO 2750 Ke|)By Parkway - PO Box 66 CrysJs»TBay, Minnesota 55323 (952) 249-4600 PERMIT Permit Number. Permit Type; Date Issued: P04001 Addition/Remodel/Repair 678/2001 SITE ADDRESS: 4070 Dahl Rd Mound. MN 55364 PID: 07-117-23-11-0019 DESCRIPTION: Proposed Use: Residential Permit Class: Building Permit Type: Addition/Remodel/Repair UBC Occupancy Ul Construction Type VN / Census Code Permit Sub-t>pc(s): Garage - Attached DecV\ f DETAILS: Approved per resolution #: Separate permits required; NOTICES/REMARKS: « FEE SUMMARY: Permit Fee;S 83.25 ValUa^tion: S 2,400.00 Plan Review Fee:S 54.08 State Surcharge Fee:S 1.20 TOTAL FEE:$ 138.53 • APPLICANT: 4070 Dahl Rd Mound. MN OWNER: 4070 Dahl Rd Mound MN 55364 the undersigned hereby requests PERM15SICK4 TONUKE THE REAL IMPROVEMENTS SPECIFIED and AGREES TO DO ALL WORK IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CITY OF ORONO ORDINANCES AND STATE OF MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS APPI.J'^ANT PtRMITEl SIGNATtRH ISSUED BYSlO ■M/ /U^ SlG^TURE Copi«: fSisniiures Reaui^ed). l-Aw)licanL l-Monthlv Rtoorts. I-Asses$in&. I-Finaicc Page I ORONO copy ■f OM ajo -J. /o f/ (fCAACC>f<^-^ lU Jl ’-// c^'t^ ^t'l /4>- //^(> -T ,wv- O'i’ Ocf/' ^/y?^ C^e.^ , r<?U/^^^^ ~/j(c/> yc/ify^ q>--J2 QyC. ^ CCO>r4:*y^Ai~- '^dSo d)/)y-/d. <’(.'/}£> d^AA rsy^^z fl>~2- ^f'T- / Sa2c2 Ipiri County Taxpayer Seryice|^^M iOT 10 \ IV 04 on- /(7- Parcel Information areal ID 0711723110019 y ... _yus# Numbar 4070 vA '^%*4aat Nama DAHL RO ' \Hy recorded map It represents a compilation and data from City, County, and State road authorities arxi ott Jif'*/!' -V,-, frUN DATE 12/26/01 BATCH 501 PROP AODR OWNER NAhE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 36 07-117-23 11 0016 00960 NORTH ARM OR B I R BICKNEU BRUCE A I RHONDA J DICKMELI. 960 NORTH ARN DR HOUND riN 55369 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 07-117-23 11 0017 00996 NORTH ARM DR J M HEIDORN S J L HEIOORN JON H A JANENE L HEIOORN 996 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55369 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 1 38 07-117-23 11 0016 09080 DAHL RD M S SOOHl ALL SODHI MANDEEP S A LEISA L SODHI 9000 DAHL ROAD MOUND MN 55369 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AODH 36 07-117-23 11 0019 09070 DAHL RO T E DAHLQUIST/M A DAHLQUIST THOMAS E A MARY A DAHLQUIST 9070 DAHL RD MOUND MN 55369 36 07-117-23 11 0020 09060 DAHL RD J A J NEVE JR JAMES P NEVE JR 9060 DAHL RO MOUND MN 55369 36 07-117-23 11 0021 09090 DAHL RD JOHN L LEPPLA A WIFE JOHN L LEPPLA 9090 DAHL RD MOUND MN 55^69 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 19 0003 09035 DAHL RD WILLIAM J ROSETH WILLIAM J ROSETH 9035 DAHL RO MOUND MN 55369 TOTAL BATCH 501 00007 m 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF HY XNUHLEOGE AND BELIEF. DATE F. y ji/ TO: FROM: DATK: 1 Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner Januar>' 11, 2002 SUBJFXT: «02-2740 JenW & Nancy Twidwell 1865 Concordia St. Variances -- Public llearine Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-IC One I'amily Lakeshore Residential District (.5 acre) 22.000 s.f. (.5 acre) List of Exhibits A Analysis Worksheet B Application C Survey/Site Plan (Proposed) D Site Plan (Existing) n Elevations/Floor Plans I' Letter from Applicants;Hardship G Letter from Designer H Letter from Adjacent Neighbor I Hardcover Calculations J Plat Map K Property Owner's List Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.22. Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (l,)(2): Hardcover in 0-75’: Within 75 of the lakeshore there shall be no hardcover. Variance Request; fo permit 252 s.f (3.27®/o) hardcover where 0 s.f is allowed. 2. Section 10.22. Subd. 2 and Section 10.56. Subd. 16 (L)(2); Hardcover in 75-250': Within 75- 250' of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover. To permit 6,248 s.f (43.69%) hardcover where 3.575 s.f (25"«) is allowed. 3. Section 10.22. Subd. 1 (B); Lakeshore Setback: No principal or accessory structure shall be located within 75 feet of the lakeshore. Variance Reque.st: To permit a variance to allow existing structure (Deck - 252 s.f) to remain within 75' of the lakeshore. Application Summary': The applicants own the subject property and are requesting hardcover in 0-75', hardcover in 75-250' and lake.shore setback variances to consiruct a new residence on the lot. U02-2'^40 Je/fry Nanc^- Twi Jmc II 1865 Concordia Street lariances 1/11/2002 Page I nbers Background: The applicant’s initial proposal was more expansive than tF Planning Commission. After reviewing the application, staff discussed the lot with the applicant, explaining that structural coverage on the lot v be over the allowed 15% by city code. The applicant decided to go forw; some modifications. The size of the proposed lot coverage by structures s.f. (14.98%) meeting the 15% structural coverage for the lot. However, zone is still exceeds the allowed amount. [unii] District (.5 acre) • Hardcover in the 75-250' setback area; Proposed to be 6,248 s.f. exceeds the 25% hardcover allowed by Orono ordinance for new (18.69%). The entire structure is located within the 75-250' .scibu The proposed plan locates the new residence behind the average lakcsho coverage by structures is located within the 75-250' setback area. Massing of the setback area. The structure is 3.297 s.f. (14.98%) w hich is w ell be riTlVAVBIIil If the applicant were to move the residence e\en further back on the pr( requirements in the 75-250' setback area a couple things would happen: • The average lakeshore setback would change for the adjacent properties decide to redevelop they would need to be located furl than currently exist. A domino would occur, with each new resideiv further back on the lot and closer to Concordia Street. Do we wan closer to Concordia Street? The proposed location keeps the new rt the neighborhood and minimizes the domino effect, but results in sicnra siiDari] rdco\cr in 0-75 ’: Within 75 ‘ of lo permit 252 s.f (3.27“o) Hardcover in the 75-250' setback area is over the allowed 25®/l required 25®/o. approximately 2,673 s.f of hardcover would need averages about 215' deep and is 102' wide. irdcover in 75-250'; Within 75- r. To permit 6,248 s.f (43.69%) d or accessorv structure shall be rmit a variance to allow existing ■rty and are requesting hardcover construct a new residence on the Statement of Hardship: The applicant has included his statement of hardship in Exhibit F. The asked for his testimony regarding this issue. Drainage: The applicant did not submit a drainage plan with the appli needs to be approved by city staff prior to City Council review of this ap Issues for Consideration: I. A residence currently exists on the property in a non-conforming Icv and will be removed. f^02-2?40 JcJJry'd Sanc}' T\ud\\ ell IS65 Concordia Sired Variances I/1 1/2002 Page 2 2. Parking is allowed on Concordia Street. Concordia Street is not a heavily traveled street. There is a slight rise in Concordia Street just to the south of the subject property, making views slightly difTlcult when e.xiting onto Concordia Street. 3. The lot area and width are conforming for the LR-IC zone, therefore is not a hardship for this property. 4. While drainage may be an e.xisting problem, it is not a hardship justifying excessive hardcover for the site. 5. The new residence will meet average lakeshore setback and all other required setbacks. Should the potential negative impact on average lakeshore setback for adjacent properties be considered as a hardship justifying excessive hardship? 6. There is not a permit on tile for the deck by the lake, however it appears it has been there for many years. Does the Planning Commission recommend the deck be removed since no hardcover is allowed in the 0-75 setback area? 7. The proposed house and deck constitute approximately 23% hardcover in the 75-250' zone leaving almost no allowance for driveway. A smaller house with reconfigured site plan meeting the 25% hardcover limit could be designed for the site, hence the site is not unbiiildable. 8. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Ba.sed on city regulations staff recommends denial of this application for the following reasons: 1. The residence does not meet 25% hardcover requirement in the 75-250' setback zone for new construction. 2. For this proposed new construction, there is no hardship demonstrated that justifies the htirdcover variance. 'I hc lot can be developed meeting ail city standards. Options for Action: 1. Recommend approval of variance and prior to going to City Council a grading plan be submitted and revie\Ncd by City Engineer. 2. Recommend denial of variance, stating reasons. 3. Table, giving applicant direction. 4. Other action. U02-2740 Jejfry & Sancy TniJitell 1865 Cot.cordia Street yariances l/U/2002 Pag* 3 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET A LR-IB Lot Area Lot Width Required .5 Acre 100’ Actual .5 Acre 102' The subject lot conforms to lot area and lot width. Lot Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 22.000 s.r.Allowed: 3,300 s.f.15% existing; 2.498 s.f.11.4% Proposed: 3,297 s.f.14.98% Hardcover Calculations Distance from fotal area in Allowed Existing Proposed shoreline setback hardcover Hardcover 1 lardcover 0-75'7,700 s.f.0 s.f.1.574 s.f.252 s.f. (0%)(20.4%)02T/o) 75-250’14,300 s.f.3,575 s.f.6.124 s.f.6,248 s.f. (25%)(42.83%)(43.69%) CITY OF ORONO - V ARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-thc-Fact Fees (Double application fee) Application # 01 '^,'7^0 Date Rccehed /2.- /B f Amount Paid ^ 2.^0 PROPERTY INFOR>L4TION Site Address______Lou.v.j ■ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)n il~7 2,^ 2.,^ nn ^2, Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired _______I I , __________________Aa ■ I (do) (^ojT^ also owTi the adjacent parcels of land. (month/year) Present use of property: )< residential Zoning District: other (specify) APPLICANT ^ Phone (home) H 7/ Name CS f A Phone (work) ~I \ Is LO~J 'loo Address: 1-jr i>>-^ rTf City: bo Zip: __ OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Phone (home) Phone (work) Address:City:.Zip: DESCRIPTIO.N OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ ^ Describe request in detail: __tv A V ^ t d____iy\J j/\ o (attach additional sheets if necessary ) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width V Hardcover Lot Coverage Setback:Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPnON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements:_____'Sf>H2jh__________________________ (attach additional sheets if necessary) M O ri f\ 5 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JEFF AND NANCY TWIDWELL OF LOT 1. BLOCK 1. EAGERNESS WOODS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LAKE MINNETONKA WEST ARM CQNTOI# OC —— ICC^C P€SC>»:PTI(X Cf P«>CmSCS lot 1. Block 1. r^aSNCSS ^xcs Ofnotft «fcn rno^k#^ nr ■jS .... dtnotvt tiiit'"? co'^lou^ lin#. fromcitymoc* 0#a» • «9»* •ko«n**of • ooitd upo*' o« dotvjn WtypsCD FtCVATOiS f 1) B a SC mEn T • •47,9 2) TCP Cf rOUNOA^CN ■ ff/. 5 3> CAWACt • o 4) r^tf 9**»* * o Th.f tur»«v mltniJl «0 •»*0» tHt bOunJjf.** o* lb« Obo.# d»IC^ •6*3 P'ectr t j. 0«a lb* propoifd l0C0t*O« 0» a pfOpo»*«l ho*i»* thff*on It d0€* «Ol purport to lh«« Q*\f otbf^ ifTfjf o*er»«t » o» •«< r o«chmt->| » TOjy too — 04<H9 ISO — MKWOi e CRONBERG 4 ASSOCIATES. INX. CZM41C ooczn rt •*J H «U.S« » IQNC L»»l »•« tS2-4Y3-«««l .a»'*» »»-' ’’•« '• Ml .mfpu40 •» •« » w«« 0«C» *ri».*VOi ««* •»«» I AM A a&* iaw<« Pwrirtn-A “• Ak.( I'-W' M'l M trtM« MLAM>« c r- a n!1 * o \ U) i I- ' ’ ■ I /•'< J -j.'/'/'V ■T^1 Ift'!, 1 l-, \ ' ‘ A i" [ Lf '1LI I nn run \:J V 1 t i 1 •• i i ♦ « » 1^*.^ • * ♦- ' k*-* ..i ‘ 1 ■J *v. Eb&p ^VL HLfv&riaij M «•«*.)•• O *>><• I©* "JjtJ' -■• —— — •*• a ^ «> V M •>« ^^71^ . * ^ - - ^%\Lp-1 -L:i LAtLt ‘alPt tLlVMlOVt t «r,^ll » a r . X ♦n. -t;‘: k«' i - ' I '-0 ■) I I 1 H '.r v I f V A •Ky \ >d_:4 t;=2=^ %r Jtrw,, rt>TA\. I *.v i y '►■>*}_ _43F^^ £>,■ \\ t.:=-sai t 't cr* C.i -l:;l. jdiy^ki '• ,v •r t» FiE-^T Flooc. 'Puqj H r •*♦ • t X L 1 'O' ’ili-iw" •MMW MM Jpf Al»VUML«T«tai*Aii -• -— —- J. . .^i 1 ' « . i» f / . iS>.Ml 1 »♦>.- v«—• i • « ♦ - Hardcover Variance - JefT and Nancy Twidwell 1865 Concordia Street The setback requirements from the lake, street and adjacent properties make the usable hardcover on this lot insufficient for an adequate home, garage, and driveway. The present structure began as a summer cabin in 1941 and has undergone numerous additions. Problems with plumbing, electrical, foundation, etc make remodeling financially impractical. The new plan will use the same or less hardcover than the present site. Also, all hardcover within the 75 foot lake setback is removed e.xcept for the stairs to the lake which already exist and will remain unchanged. Addendum to Hardcover Variance Jeff and Nancy Twidwell 1865 Concordia Street 'Hie hardship of this property has to do witli lot limitations. As per Orono regulations , a structure up to 15% of lot size is deemed appropriate. Our proposed structure meets this recommendation, but to place the home in the proper setback to be in accord with adjoining properties, our lot has inadequate hardcover to allow a functionally adequate driveway and turnaround. A. Comparing the proposed hardcover to the e.xisting hardcover, both total hardcover and hardcover within the 0 - 75’ zone are markedl)' reduced. 1. l otal I lardcover existing - 7698 SF proposed - 650C SF reduction of 15.6 % 2. 0 - 75' 1 lardcover existing - 1574 SI' proposed - 252 SF (only steps to fake remain unchanged) 3. structure (house, garage, deck) 3297 sf = 15% of lot B. Improxed drainage on lot w ith new proposal. 1. lower hardcover, especially in most important 0-75’ zone 2. improved grade for better absorption / filtration, niiiking existing and new’ “non hardcover ’ areas more effective 3. although both are considered hardcover, large concrete patio present now on lake side (600s0 replaced by smaller deck (324sf) w ith slatted floor and functional absorptive area beneath; will dramatically slow runoff and improve absorption 4. small bumis to be added on north side to sknv drainage and increase absorption 5. large hillside on lakeside present now- densely planted; this feature dramatically increases w ater absorption and decreases runoff of tliis lot and is maintained '6- t C. Need for driveway with turnaround. 1. property on narrow street and hill; backing onto street from driveway dangerous and impractical. 2. length on driveway determined by proper location of home on lot (i.e. in alignment with adjacent homes 75’ setback) We have worked very hard to present a plan that meets the intent of tlic ordinances - to improve Lake Minnetonka water quality, to minimize water runoff, and to maintain proper aesthetics in Orono’s lakeshore community - while allowing us to build an adequate home for our needs. With our proposal, Orono benefits, Lake Minnetonka benefits, our lot benefits, and we benefit. Thank you for your careful consideration. Regards, lfelT*iwi^u^U /'t.c^■ (J.\/'.i Nancy Twidwell January II. 2002 To: Members of the City of Orono Re: Application for Variance For: Jeff & Nancy Twidwell Lot I, Block I Fayemess H'ootls Hennepin County, MN To Whom It May Concern: This Application for Variance is requested to improve the property at the description listed above. The proposed house is moderately sized, well suited for the site and will complement the beauty and charm of Orono. Current Hardships: • Small Lot Square footage • Drainage Problems • No Space for Street Parking due to Concordia .street narrowness Proposed Benefit to Residence: • Reduce hardcover by approximately 1600 S.F. • Excellent design concept with more desirable square footage • Alleviate drainage concerns by re-grading the site and increasing the green area • New driveway design will allow space for guest parking I fully believe the propo.sed plans will be an a.sset and enhance both the Twidwell property and the City of Orono. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Please feel free to contact me if lean he of further a.ssi.stance at (763) 424-3676. Sincere Todd Ofsthun Owner/Design Specialist T.C.O. Design ,0 y ^0^ Orono Land Use Application U ^/— ^ I/10/02 To Whom It Mav Concern: We are writing this letter as support for the home project of Jeffrey and Nancy Twidwell at 1865 Concordia Street. Having lived at that property from May 1954 until the summer of 1983. we can appreciate the dilliculties of deliberations for the Iwidwclls. whether to remodel or rebuild. It was a Minnetonka Lake cabin built in 1941. too close to the side lot line and too low on the grade or elevation of the land. Drainage of runoff water around the house has alwa> s been a problem. During the years of our remodeling, drain tile, retaining walls and any regrading that could be done helped but did not cure the basic drainage problems of the house. The proposed plan of the Twidwells, addresses the drainage issue as well as some pluses in the hard cover of the property. As we understand it the total hardcover w ill be reduced from 7698 sq ft to 6653 sq ft (about a 14% reduction) as well as removal of all but 252 sq ft (the stairway acce.ss to the lake) of hard cover in the 0-75 ft range (at present 1575 sq ft). So the house pri»per will be behind the 75 ft /one. We realize the hard cover proposed does not fit the guidelines, but to replace the present living quarters and still provide an adequate house for a family of four it does provide the following: 1. A 14% reduction of overall hard cover 2. A major reduction of hard cover in the 0-75 ft range. 3. A correction of the drainage problem of the present structure. We would urge you to approve this land use application Sincerely, /I Vincent^. Anderson 1855 Concordia Street HARDCOVE SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) C 0-751 EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A« House ULATION WORKSHEET 75-250* Length Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Dcck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X A A TOTAL LL\RDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - B _ _ + B X 100 X 100 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______________ Length Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/T}cck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Other X X X X X X X X X A - TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE _____________ ^ B X 100 250-500*500-1000* iSO S.F. a ^ 4 S.F. l 4 S.F. -S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. s S.F. *S.F. 2--S S.F. XB iA^S.F. B S.F. B S.F. =S.F. SF. S.F.A •SF.B ts % «% a S.F. m S.F. a S.F. s S.F. a S.F. _S.F. =S.F. S.F. =S.F. 2 S L.SF.I S SF. a SF. -S.F. -S.F. S.F. 3^2 S.F.A -l~^CO S.F.B s % -A".a HARDCOVER CALCO SETBACK ZOSE: (CIRCLE ONE) EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House _____________ Length B. Garage C. Driveway D, Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric 0-75' X X X X X X X X X X X X LAIJQSiMp (^75-25^ RKSHEET 2S0-S00' Width 500-1000' ii-lH ini in S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. inST S.F. <.(1 S.F. concrLH- 2. PC? S.F. S.F. SF. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A _____________ -i- B PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X Length B. Garage C Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Paiio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X X X X 100 mjih b I S.F. \^[\C0 S.F A ______ S.F. M 1. y j fc HIL—S.f. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. LCO LI _S.F. _S.F. _S.F. SLH S.F. y\ S.F. S.F. S.F. G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ___________ + B s S.F. t?0 S.F. A X 100 S.F. B % V'' 10^ Upln County Taxpayer Services /y- /1-7-A^,^-&>, /jv 17 65 1 14 ' /< (15)i"/ A y / / i: ' '‘' i/ -V <?« ^ 1, /\ /A 115 (7) ? / ____________JZL^/ ' X 3l 6* ' FAGERNESS \ ^70^ O*. ^\ M C)•*• ^ 0 .-• i ff^tT n Information I ■i'A.1 ,^:A/v•’‘■ '^-C-U' ''V-; Parcel ID 1711723230032 House Number 1B65 ’' Street Name CONCORDIA 8T « This is not a legally recorded map It represents a compilation pf fnfoqna^^ and data from City, County, and State road authorities and c^tier sourcesf^ }^. RUH DIkTE 12/OE/Ql BKTCH PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 30 17-117-23 22 0015 01025 CONCORDIA ST L F I S L GEHU LARRY I SHARON GEHL 1025 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA HN 55391 30 17-117-23 23 0002 01005 CONCORDIA ST JANES V PECCHIA JAMES PECCHIA 1005 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA HN 55391 30 17-117-23 23 0032 01065 CONCORDIA ST J J TWIDWELL I N A TWIDWELL JEFFRY J i NANCY A TWIDWELL 1065 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA HN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 17-117-23 22 0025 OlOOO CONCORDIA ST P D X K J HANSEN PAUL t KAREN HANSEN 1000 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA HN 55391 30 17-117-23 23 0022 01090 CONCORDIA ST CAROL COOK X GREGORY R COOK CAROL COOK 1090 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA HN 55391 30 10-117-23 lA 0001 01095 CONCORDIA ST B P SUNDSTROH X J H OLAUSEN BRIAN SUNDSTROH/JUDY OLAUSEN 1095 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA HN 55591 REPORT NO. PI635^01 PAGE 13 30 17-117-23 22 0038 01055 CONCORDIA ST V R X V B ANDERSON TRUSTEES VINCENT X VIRGINIA ANDERSON 1055 CONCORDIA ST WAYZATA HN 55391 30 17-117-23 23 0023 01050 CONCORDIA ST STEVEN D TOWLE ETAL STEPHEN D TOWLE 5115 PINNACLE OR OLDSMAR FL 39677 TOTAL BATCH 509 00000 }0 TO: FROM: DATE: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Wendy Bottenberg. Zoning Administrator/Planner Januar\- 14. 2002 SUBJECT: #02-2741 Vannian Co. on behalf of Calvin Presbyterian Church 177 Glendale Drive Conditional Use Permit -• Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-IB One Family Rural Residential (2 acre) (Scptic/Well) Lot Area: 261,208 s.f. (5.997 acre in Orono) 14.261 s.f ( .327 acre in l ong Lake) Approx. Total 275,469 s.f (6.324 acres) List of Exhibits A Application B Sur\ey C Site Plan D Topographic Map E F loor Plans F Views G Church Calendar H Plat Map I Property Owner's List Application: Conditional Use Permit for additions to an existing church in a residential zoning district. Application Summary : Calvin Presbyterian Church is proposing to construct a 3.335 s.f Fellowship Hall with an adjoining kitchen and storage space, an expanded gathering area and neu toilet rooms on the upper level. The Fellowship Hall is on the back (\%est) side of the church. Both additions will be two tloors. The bottom levels will contain the mechanicals for the building and storage space. Calvin Presbyterian Church is also proposing a new driveway olf Glendale Drive uhich will lead to a parking area of six parking stalls, of which 2 are handicapped accessible. Calvin Presbyterian Church has existed since the early 1960's. however no conditional use pemiit to allow the church in an "R" district is of record. Approval was granted in 1967 to construct a Boy Scout club house and in 1990 approval was granted to construct a storage building on the property. Neither time was a full review for a conditional use permit to allow a church in residential property completed, so that will be added to this review to formalize the church's use of the site. Calvin Presbyterian Church is unusual that part of the property is located within City of Orono limits and a small portion within City of Long Lake. All buildings on the site are in Orono. The property is currently ser\ iceo by an on-site treatment system and water is provided from Long Lake. U02-2'-tl Calvin Prvs Church (Vanman Co ) / 77 GlenJatc Drive CUP 1/14/2002 Page / Surrounding Properties and Impacts: The property is located in the RR-IB zoning district. The surrounding properties arc also zoned RR-IB. Even though the zoning district is 2 acre, the subject property is almost 7 acres. 1 here is substantial land between the church and adjacent homes. Site Area: (Including property in Long Lake) = 6.324 acres Building Setback:Required - 50' from any lot line front (East) Side (South) Adj Street (North) Rear (West) lixisting 234’ (90' from City boundary) 470’+ 190’ 75’ Parking: Number of parking spaces: Churches require the following parking standards: One parking space for each 4 seats of capacity in the main assembly hall or sanctuary . The architect indicated 220 seats in the sanctuary. Divided by 4 requires 55 parking spaces. Currently: 93 spaces and 4 handicapped accessible, for a total 97 parking stalls. Additional Proposed: 4 spaces and 2 handicapped accessible. ■fotal: 103 parking stalls. The church ’s primary use is Sunday morning serx iccs. but does have ongoing limited daily activities. .A church calendar is provided, see Fixhibit E. New Access: 1 he church is proposing an additional access off Glendr.le Drive. I his access will lead to the back of the church and provide some parking stalls. '.Vorks Director. Greg Gappa. reviewed the proposal and has no issues with the add . access, lie did suggest the possibility of some type of landscaping to screen the parking area from the road. I here are no exiting homes directly across from this access point which would be adversely affected by headlights. Note that this ea.st-we.st segment of Glendale Drive exists as a public prescriptive easement over the propcrt\ at 270 Willow Drive North (see plat map). It appears from the tt)pography of the site and roadway that the portion of property historically used for roadway/drainage'utility purposes extends to the church property boundary. a02'2''4l Culvin Pres Church (Winnun CoJ 177 Glendale Drive CLP l/N 2002 Page 2 Lighting; A lighting plan has not been completed for the project. City Ordinance requires that light sources not be visible at property lines. 1 he church has discussed the possibility of adding a light pole by the new access behind the church. Existing lighting is located on either side of the parking lot. One light is on the top of the telephone pole, another on a light pole and two smaller lights on the front of the church by the front doors. If additional lighting is requc.'ted, the church would need to submit a plan for review prior to issuance of a permit. Landscaping Plan: The property is landscaped and the church plans no substantial modification of the existing landscape. Septic: The property contains a private sewage treatment system. Routine inspections have determined the septic system on the property is non-compliant and must be replaced by 2010. fhe current septic code does not prohibit use of the property due to non-compliant systems. I low ever. if it should be detennined the system is failing the system would reuuire immediate replacement or could potentially hook up to sewer since the property was Just included in the MUSA. The septic inspector has reviewed the propo.sed use of the property and has determined the existing sentic system would need to be upgr.idcd hcforc cxMistruction of the kitchen could begin. At that time, if the church w ishes to convert to sewer, sewer ser\ ice could potentially be provided by City of Long Lake. Orono currently does not have laterals w hich could ser\ e this property directly, although a .stub apparently intended to service this side as part of the 1973 Hackberry sewer project exists near the southwest corner of the site but does not abut the site, the church was not assessed for sewer. Future development in this area, which was recently reguided for 2-3 units/acre, could result in new sewer lateral which might serve the church. Signage Allowance:1 s.f per foot of lot w idth, not over 50 s.f W'ith a 10' required setback. A signage plan was not submitted w ith the application. If a change is requested, the church would need to submit a plan for review prior to issuance of a permit. Grading/Drainage: A grading plan has not been designed, but minimal change to the existing grade is expected. This is an existing site and building. Under Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) Rule N, the church potentially w ill be required to do runoff rate control ponding us well as adhere to Best U02-274I Calvin Pres. Church (Vanman Co.) 177 Glendale Drive CUP 1/I4.'200J Page 3 Management Practices. The church is advised to contact the MCWT). A grading plan should be required prior to final Council action on this application. CUP for Church Use: As noted above, the church apparently has never been formally issued a CUP for the church use of the site. The existing and proposed use of the site complies with all the standards applicable to a church use. A formal CUP for the church should be issued along with the approval for the addition. The resolution for the addition will contain language formalizing the church use CUP. Standard CUP Requirements: A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, and the use does not cease for a periou of more than 6 months. CL^Ps may be revokable, may be granted for a limited time, or may be granted subject to conditions as the Council may prescribe. Fire Suppression: The church has been advised that the entire existing and new building have to be pro\ ided with fire suppression sprinkling as a result of the additions. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit w ith the follow ing conditions: 1. Resolution shall contain lar guage formalizing the church use of the property. 2. Additions approved per submitted site plan subject to: a. Kitchen not being installed until/unless the septic system is upgraded to accommodate that additional use. or the building is connected to sanitarv sewer. b. Grading plan including any stormwater management systems required by MCWD must be submitted prior to final Council action. 3. Any change or more intense use of the property w ill require an amendment to the conditional use permit. 4. A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, and the use does not cease for a period of more than 6 months. If the use of the property as a church would cease for a period of 6 months a new conditional use permit is required. tt02-274l Calvin Pres Church (Vannum Co ) Glendale Drive CUP I N 2002 Page 4 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Completed Application Form. Describe request in detail. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Government Center, 348-3271). Certificate ot Survey (signed by a licen.sed surveyor) - refer to handout for survey information. Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Topographic survey (existing and proposed contours) if land alterations involve changes in elevation (grades). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). Construction plan, if applicable (see staff for requirements). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other rersons you wish notified of this application. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY <' OPIES OF LARGE DOCUMENTS OR COPY FOR REPRODUCTION (11" V r > n SMALLER) FOR ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. (Staff will requi.c drawings of ail documents, plans, etc. to be submitted.) The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is mit complete it the above information has not been included. Certification by Clerical Department that Land Use .Application is complete. Initials of Clerical Staff:_____ Daie APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide ill information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or unusual expenses incurred in re\ iew of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the be^t of his. her knowledge. A Applicant's signature Date OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and \erification of this request. St Date y 2' # *1 ** ZOo/ Applicant must have all submittals into the Cit> offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to anend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent anend in your place and advise the Building Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting ’ •• f ‘i . * jj i Jl E Site Plan "Kf Y'-fet-: ■ rr«- *• L. 1009.8 r f c ■. ) \ • . j t J__I__■ ■ I Unexcavated I Lower Level Calvary Presbyterian Church Orono, Mf4 I I I I I I I I I I I Mech Storagen ■ n • n }!I1M Up J / J tt) J I I Storage V I I I I Unexcavated 0 5 10 N VANMAN rOM PA N I L S C^\ r\ Calvin Presbyterian Church Orono, MN ts i " • . A-V VANMAN C <>M P N N I I S▼“V\ Option E Calvin Presbyterian Church Orono, MN J- ' . *- I y 1 VANMAN roM PA Nils INVJ V niVlDIlK *ZUU1 ^"^*^^*^****^^ ^^■"^•^^PMfMiTiTTi ^F)^]rttfldl WrHnTudniq WEE30EM5AMOSTCX»DIALINVnAT10NTOYDUTO PARnaPATCINWORSHIP,SIUDYANDTHEMANYOmERACnvmESINmELireOFOURCALVlNFAMILY. vIMiaOviaMiiC.^y SUNDAY ^EACHWEEK WEDNESDAY ONCE EACH M(WH SESSlQNMEEnNG PRESBYTERY SJ ‘.Y.6'HYC;ACnVIIES iRCENTERACnvmES ADULT NIGHT/PAMILY Nia rr MARY ANDMAKITiA CIRCLE ABIGAILCIRCLE RUmCIRCLE LOAVESfrPBHESJOO CHURCHSTAFF PASTOR YOUIHLEADER CLERKOFSESSm CHOIR DIRECTOR HANDBELL DIRBCIOR ORGANIST: SBCRE1RARY: CUSTODIAN: mANOALSECRETARY: TREASURER ftSOAM WaakipSafTio* Naan^ AvallaU* 1O30AM CoOMPcUomliip 10b45AM C JilMiaat Cknlr Cku^ School tor [ TodcUar - 12<h Grado/NuBorq AvallaUe 7d00FM MbUloSchooI(SP.Y;i)ai:w... 7:00PM S«iorHiah(HYjCy - 7^X)IM CLoacalCh^ -“ '* I II r. l«t Moadaq at 7D0 PM SadTiMidaq Aiadiodiilad T ool , Than, Pd. at Sl Gaoq^ Coounaalt^ Caater Attchadalad 4ili Wadnaadai| at 9D0 AM Mooday avanlaijjt at GdX) FM 3id Thuadaq at 7:X) PM - Maati at Piaahgtaflaa Homaa lalTnaadaq at PM - Maat* at BatUahaoi Lniharan Choich Rav. Dt. Bfi^ar E mU PatGnihar WaltarBakar David Walta WllauiHa^aa V LotoPottar SaMaHtlLnaB \- DavldZaJac y.~ MahalNortoa JlmMiiW 4.' ' ■ tf TAMAHA CK SENIOR CENTER NOVEMEBER ACTIVITIES 952-476-2554 TAMARACK THANKSGIVING CELEBRATION Tamarack’s Thanksgiving Celebration for all area seniors will be on Thursday, November 15 at noon. We will be having a traditional meal of turkey with all the trimmings and pumpkin pie. After our feast we will be entertained by Dean Neibon and his wood carving demonstration. In addition all people with October and November Birthdays will be honored. Join us for a fun day. Reservations are due by November i3tb. Please call the Center, 952-476-2554, to reserve your place. SENIOR SAFETY PROGRAM There will be a Special Program on November 7. The van departs at 8:00 AM for a Senior Safety Program being held at Plymouth Creek Center. There will be an 8:30AM breakfast followed by the program. Cost is $7.00. Call the Center to register. FL U SHOTS A VAILABLE A flu shot cUnic will be held at the Center on Tuesday, November 20th from 9:30AM to 1I:30AM. Reservations are required. The flu shot is free to all seniors with a Medicare card. Seniors who use an ilMO plan should get their shot at their HMO. There will be a $15.00 charge for all others. Please call the Center for a reservation. AAA DRIVERS CLASS A Refresher’s Driver Class will be offered by AAA at the Tamarack Center on November 15th. The class meets from 1U:00AM to 3:00PM. To register for the course, please call 1- 888-234-1294. r45f YOUR VOTE Van service is available for voting on November 6th. Call the Center to reserve a seat on the van to go to your polling place in the morning. «cA .>Tl' T r -V * _ ' .T'rTT;:. . m Ncvember 2€€1 CommuMlon 4 9.*00 AM Choir Rchetntl 9 JO AM Wonhip/Nimcry 10 30AM CofTee Time 10 4SAM Church School (fareilafet) 7.00 PM SPY imeel 7.00 AM Men’s Mlowihip BrsikAit 6.00 PM MisiiociA>itreech 7 00 P.M Session D^dk^tton SmuUiy 11 9.00 AM Choir RehetrseJ 9'JO AM Wonhip/Nuncry 10:30AM CoflTee Time 10:4SAM Church School (for ell eges) 300 PM cm CoohOfT 700 PM SPY'S meec 900 AM Choir Rehetnil 9:30 AM Worsiii|v?«luiMry 10:30AM CofTee Time 10:45AM Church School 12 PM KMs Ctub-BosHinf 7.00 PM SPY'S med 9.00 AM Choir lUhcMisJ 9 JO AM Wonhip/Nunery 10 30AM Coffee Time NO Church School (for ill ages) NO SPY'S meet 900AMO.LF.T 4.00 PM Loaves it Fishes 7 00 PM PW/CT 9 00 AM Decdsber Eavoy Dediline 9.O0AMQ.1.F.T. 500 PM Presbytery roeeti 6 00 PM Hmdbdls 7:00 PM HYC's 7:00 PM Choir Rchr^nsJ 7.00 PM Tdephooe Leader Fill Campaign 8 7 30 PMRulbarde 6:00 PM Handbells 7 00 PM HYC’i 7.00 PM Choir Rehcanai 9 00AMO.LF.T. 7:00 PM Building CommiQee 6.00 PM AMgail Cirde 9:00AMQ1F.T. 7:00 PM CEmeeu NO Handbells NO HYCs NO Choir Rehcanai 7 JO PM Ecumenical Service al St Martins 00 the Lake OmCE CLOSED 9 00 AM Mary A Mdtha 6 00 PM Handbdis 7.00 PM HYC s 7.00 PM Choir Rehcanai OFnCE CLOSED 9:00 AM HANGING'? OFTf€ GREENS flr T' V t /-J P'. ' •• "n*, ■'• '• •* ?) I X T i§§ !« Jiiji it I ifcfW tr p 6. CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 177 Glendale Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED NON-PROFIT Long Lake, MN U.S. Postage PERMIT NO. 8 mninitilU__ unmnninin^^ A A 1 t ii ' itii'h THE CALVIN ENVOY ■vb December 2€€1 WvJ\M •* . % % Suii *9 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat ftOQAMCMrl MOAMWeohWNi lft30A4CdheTtoe ia45AKCtenhSAaol 7.00PM SPT'iMel immOrnthm ^fOgkm ^OQAMCMRjtoMl »JOAM Woiil^aMfy IftJQAMCo&tTtet lft4SAMChMii 7<»PU iPri IMAUUm^ufdkm^ Btmkhm 6.<»m MinkaiADuircMli TDOPMSanioa CUUhvfl ^ CMm P.00AJ4 Okw Mwid U PJQAM WoaMpMMMfy lOtJOAIICoflbvTM ia4SAMCteASilMl 70QPM SPY*! Ml PW 9Q0AU Choif P30AM Wonki^Miy IftTOAMCflObtYtaw NO HO KPY*i ^UOAMOMirMiMl f JOAM Waak^NMiy aJOAMCoffttTlM 9.O0AM kmmy Envoy 9X»AMOXF.T. 4.O0PM Lotvci A FUhet 7.O0PMBliS«i«Cofisn. oOOPM Hndbdh 7X)0PMHYCsiiimI 7.0QPM Choir Rdvral 9.O0AMaLF.T. 9XMAMOXF.T. SJOPMdi NO SPY*# 6 O0PM HADdbefis 7.00PM liYC fOBMl 7.O0PM Cboa Rchcmil 530PM RMhClHbr«oiiag 6.00PM HMdbdla 700PM HYCiowel 700PM Choir Reh^rsal 930-11.00 AM natslY Prmchoe 9J0-11O0AM PncOoe 7J0PMIUaliCack 9JO-IIJOAM tactioe Lunch FoUoin 22 9 00AM AoomI Reports Due NOtUndbcUiorHYC*! NOChovRehemsl 0 ■ c c Rvm DME in/ll/Ql BI^TCH 506 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 58 35-118-23 61 0005 00225 WILLOW DR N JANES D DILLHAN JANES D OILLNAN 225 WILLOW DR NO LONG LAKE NN 55556 liENHEPIH COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEN PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 58 55-118-25 61 0006 02600 WOODHAVEN OR MILTON H BIX MILTON H BIX 2600 WOODHAVEN DR LONG LAKE NN 55356 REPORT NO. PI635601 PACE 21 58 35-118-23 6l 0010 02665 WOODHAVEN OR JAP HARRIS JOHN T I PATRICIA L HARRIS 2665 WOODHAVEN DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 • ( C C C PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER HANE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANE/ADDR 38 33-118-23 61 0011 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED WOODHAVEN HOMEOWNERS ASSN WOODHAVEN HOMEOWNERS ASSN C/0 LINDA HUTCHINS 2550 WOODHAVEN DR LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 36-118-23 32 0003 00560 . WILLOW DR N CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL DAY NN 55323 38 53-118-23 66 0020 00095 WILLOW OR N LIE FAIRBANKS ELEANOR A FAIRBANKS 95 WILLOW DR NO LONG LAKE NN 55356 38 56-118-25 32 0006 00260 WILLOW DR N RONALD E MILLER RONALD E MILLER 270 N WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE NN 55556 38 33-118-23 66 0036 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED TOWN OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY NN 55323 38 56-118-23 32 0005 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED WM L HURSH LYOLA HURSH 766 HILLTOP CT MOUNT DORA FL 32757 J C PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPi^YER NANE/ADDR 38 56-118-25 33 0001 00177 GLENDALE DR PRESBYTERY OF MPLS INC CALVIN PRESBY CHURCH GRAND AVE I GLENDALE LONG LAKE NN 55356 58 56-118-23 55 0056 00190 WILLOW DR N KEITH A WILLIAMSON ET AL KEITH A WILLIAMSON 190 N WILLOW DR LONG LAKE NN 55356 58 36-118-23 33 0055 00038 ADDRESS UNASSICNED GAVE RENDLENAN WILLIAM MARTIN 2580 WATERTOWN RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 PROP ADDR OWNER NAML TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 38 36-118-23 53 0057 02560 WATERTOWN RO S J KELLEY I A CARMICHIEL STEVE KELLY ARLA CARMICHIEL 2560 WATERTOWN RD LONG LAKE NN 55356 58 56-118-23 33 0058 02550 WATERTOWN RD DEL HALLIWILL DEAN HALLIWILL 2550 WATERTOWN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 56-118-23 32 0007 00201 GLENDALE DR CALVIN PRESB CHURCH OF ORONO CALVIN PRESBY CHURCH GRAND AVE I GLENDALE LONG LAKE KN 55565 C PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NANF./ADDR 72 56-118-23 32 0008 00251 HARRINGTON DR N C PESCHEL ET AL MICHAEL C PESCHEL 556 HARRINGTON DR LONG LAKE MN 55556 72 36-118-25 32 0009 02250 GRAND AVE S L HOLMBERG t D J HOLMBERG S L HOLMBERG i D J HOLMBERG 2250 GRAND AVE LONG LAKE MN 55556 72 36-11L-25 32 '*010 02268 GRAND AVE FAY C WINEMAN FAY C WINEMAN 2268 GRAND AVE LONG LAKE MN 553S6 H ' c < ( RUN DATE 12/11/01 BATCH 506 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 72 34-118-25 32 0011 00232. GLENDALE DR A J ( B AHLSTROH ARVID J AHLSTROH 232 GLENDALE OR LONG LAKE HN 55356 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 72 34-11B-23 32 0014 00199 HARRINGTON DR PATRICK F DUPONT PATRICK F DUPONT 199 HARRINGTON DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 J REPORT NO. PI435401 PACE 22 72 34-116-23 32 0015 02265 GRAND AVE D 6 J ANDERSON D H t J A ANDERSON 2265 GRAND AVE LONG LAKE HN S5356 .3 J PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 72 34-118-23 32 0016 00241 HARRINGTON DR CHRISTOPHER J KIESER CHRISTOPHER J KIESER 241 HARRINGTON OR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 34-118-23 32 0017 00253 HARRINGTON CIR JOHN T HIDING JOHN T HIDING 253 HARRINGTON CIRCLE LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 34-118-23 32 0018 00263 HARRINGTON CIR DAVID J REID DAVID J REID 263 HARRINGTON CIR LONG LAKE HN 55356 I PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER ■ NAHE/ADDR 72 34-118-23 32 0019 00275 HARRINGTON CIR K H BEAM I J L BEAM KRISTOPHER 8 JENNIFER BEAM 275 HARRINGTON CIR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 34-118-23 32 0020 00285 HARRINGTON CIR B « J DROEN BRIAN H DROEN 285 HARRINGTON CIR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 34-118-23 32 0021 00297 HARRINGTON CIR L S C H L GUSTAFSON LINDA S t WAYNE L GUSTAFSON 297 HARRINGTON CIR LONG LAKE HN 55356 J J PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 72 34-118-23 33 0006 02296 WATERTOWN RD J R t C E "NN ' • JOHN R ■ C. aHIN E DUNN 2296 WATERTOWN RD LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 34-110-23 33 0014 00111 GLENDALE DR CARON L HAHN CARON L HAHN 111 GLENDALE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-118-23 33 0012 00095 GLENDALE DR S P « P J SWANLUND STEVEN P t PAMELA J SHANLUND 95 GLENDALE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 34-118-23 33 0015 00121 GLENDALE DR MARGARET POTTER TRUSTEE MARGARET A POTTER P 0 BOX 378 1990 KENNEDY LA LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 34-118-23 33 0013 00105 GLENDALE DR E JOHN ZAVITZ E JOHN ZAVITZ 105 GLENDALE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 34-118-23 33 0016 00131 GLENDALE DR L t P ASCHENBECK LEE H 8 PEGGY H ASCHENBECK 131 GLENDALE DRIVE LONG LAKE HN 55356 J ) J PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER N<J1E/AODR 72 34-110-23 33 0017 00145 GLENDALE DR J A GEHRKE 8 P VIETH JILL GEHRKE 8 PAUL VIETH 145 GLENDALE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 34-118-23 33 0018 00153 GLENDALE DR ILEEN J KELLEY ANTHONY 8 JUDITH ROE 153 GLENDALE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 34-118-23 33 0019 00177 GLENDALE DR CALVIN PRESS CHURCH OP ORONO CALVIN PRESBY CHURCH GRAND AVE 8 GLENDALE • LONG LAKE HN 55356 D mm DATE 12/11/01 c BATCH SOB PROP ADDR . OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR 72 3A-116-23 33 0020 00173 HARRINGTON DR DAVID L KING ETAL DAVID L KINO 173 HARRINGTON DR LONG LAKE HN 5535B HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEH PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 72 3B-118-23 33 0021 00155 HARRINGTON DR , . RICHARD V KOZAK RICHARD V KOZAK ‘ 155 HARRINGTON DR ' ' LONG LAKE tIN 55356 < • REPORT NO. PIA35401 PACE 23 72 34-118-23 33 0022 ' ’ 30141 HARraNCTON DR ; ' D P « P H NELSEN IV, DENNIS P t PEGGY M NELSEN ' 141 HARRINGTON DR LONG LAKE HN SS356 ;• ^ • c C C C ( C c PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAHE TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR I 72 3A-118-23 S3 0023 00129 HARRINGTON DR PHYLLIS A HEYER PHYLLIS A HEYER 129 HARRINGTON DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-118-23 33 0026 00119 GLENDALE DR L H FRETHEIH ETAL LELAND H FRETHEIH 119 GLENDALE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-118-23 33 0093 00178 GLENDALE DR JAHES C RETTINCER JAMES C t LAURA L RETTINGER; 321 HARRINGTON DR LONG LAKE HN 5f356 72 39-118-23 33 0029 00115 HARRINGTON DR P I W KIHHER PAUL J I WENDY G KIHHER 115 HARRINGTON DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-118-23 33 0029 00169 GLENDALE DR J C FARLEY t C A FARLEY JAMES C FARLEY 169.N GLENDALE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-118-23 33 0059 00198 GLENDALE DR DONALD W HAAS ET AL DR DONALD W HAAS 198 GLENDALE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39-118-23 33 0025 00092 GLENDALE DR MARY H WENBERG NARY H WENBERG 92 GLENDALE DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 72 39- ;j-23 33 0092 00189 hp^rRINGTON DR LINDA J OLSwN LINDA J OLSON 189 HARRINGTON DR LONG LAKE HN 55356 TOTAL BATCH . . 506 00047 •; . • '* • •»* : . • ‘ . ^ ‘ .0 ' ’ C c I CEiTTIFV THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORHATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF T'iE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST ' OF HY KNOHLELJE AND BELIEF. DATE w2'74:\ i ' ^ 0 ;l TO: FROM; DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Wendy Bottenberg. Zoning Administrator/Planncr Januar> 4. 2001 <i02-2742 Douglas and Rohan Smith 4195 Highwood Road Variance -- Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: LR-1H One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre) j9. 150 s.f. (.9 acres) List of F.xhihits A Analysis Worksheet B Application C Survey/Site Plan D Description of Proposal/I iardships E F loor Plans/ elevations F Average lakeshore setback map G 1991 Resolution (Avc. Lakeshore Setback) H 1983 Resolution (garage) I Photos of Property J Plat Map K Property Owner's List L Topi)grapliy M I Iardco\ or Worksheet Application Summary: This application is two fold. First, the applicant.s ha\e recently purchased the property and are proposing to construct a 10’ addition to the side ofthe residence. 1 he addition would be to enlarge the kitchen and mudroom. Fhe bedrooms below the kitchen would ahso be increased by 10’ and a dormer would be added to the second lloor bedroom. In 1991. the former owners ol the property applied for and were granted an average lakeshore setback to permit constnicttan ol a major addition and other work to the residence. I he proposed addition lies behind the average lakeshore setback determined in l‘*91. fhe second part of the application is an addition to the detached garage. The applicants are proposing to construct a 12’ wide storage area to the existing detached garage In 19S.3. a \ariance was granted to allow a 24' x 32' (768 s.L) garage to be ' 'cated 9.»3' from the street property line instead ol the required 35 feet. I he addition would be on the south side ofthe building and would bring it to within approximately 25' of the residence. The garage addition increases the garage footprint to 24 x 44 or 1056 s.L, rnaking it an oversi/e accessory stmeture subject to greater setback restrictions. U02-2~42 an J Rvhan Smith 4195 Hty,hwooJ Road I 'ariance.i 1 4 2002 Pattc I Pertinent Code Sections 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B)and Section 10.56. Subd. 16(C)(6): Average LakcshorcSetback: The average lake.shore setback line shall be a straight tine connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. Variance Request: To permit a variance to encroach 25' into the average lakeshore setback. 2. Section 10.03, Subd 9(C)(3): Setbacks for Oversize Accessory Structure: No oversizeaccessorv structure shall be located less than 30 from the side or rear lot line. Variance Request: To permit a variance to allow an oversized accessory structure to be located 9.6 feet from the street property line. 3. Section 10.03. Subd. 9 (I£): Oversized Accessor}- Structure: In all ’R" Districts no accessory building shall exceed 1.000 square feet of footprint area except that accessory structures in e.xcess of 1,000 square feet will be allowed under the following conditions: A. Not more than one Oversized Acces.sory Structure (OAS) shall be permitted on any property. An "Oversized Accessory Structure" is defined as an accessory structure of footprint area in excess of 1,000 square feet. B. Oversized Accessory Structures are regulated by the following table: I (It Area 0-1.99 acre 2.00-3.00 acre Maximum Individual Accessory Structure Tootprint Area 1,000 s.r. 1.200 s.f. Maximum Allowed Total of All Accessorv Structure Footprint .Areas* on a Property 2,000 s.f. 2.400 s.f Statement of Hardship The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Hxhibit D. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. ^ssue.s for ron.sidcrationi 1 The room addition meets lot coverage by structures, setbacks and hardcover requirements for the property. The original existing house w as built prior to lakeshore regulations. 2 The proposed room addition lies behind the average lakeshore setback approval in 1991. *K)2-27.f2 Douglas and Rohan Smith 4195 llighwood Road Variances 1/4 2002 Page 2 3.The shape of the shoreline makes it difficult for this property to meet the average lakeshore setback. 4.The steep topography along the west side of the property limits any view impact from the adjacent property. 5. The detached accessory’ building is in good structural condition. 6.Does the fact that the property will end up less than 15% lot coverage justify allowing an oversized accessory structure where one would not normally be allowed? The applicant's other option is to construct a separate accessory storage building, but would that be pos.sibIe or appr oriate given the characteristics of the site? 7.The steep slope of the land to the immediate south of the detached garage limits where an addition could be constructed. 8. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Option.s for Action 1. Recommend approval of variances as presented, 2. Recommend approval of variance to permit av erage lakeshore setback to allow the construction of the addition to the residence, l o deny the v ariance to permit an ov ersized accessory building. 3 Recommend both variances for denial, .stating reasons. 4. Table for additional information. 5. Other action. U02-2742 Douglas and Rohan Smith 4195 Highwood Road ^ artances 1/4 2002 Page 3 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Hardcover Calculations A LR-IB Lot Area Required 1 Acre Actual .9 Acres Distance from Total area in Allowed Existing Proposed shoreline setback hardcover I lardcover 1 lardco\er 0-75'11,250 s.f.0 s.f.832 s.f.832 s.f (0%)(7.4%)(7.4%) No Change 75-250 ’27.900 s.f.6,975 s.f.5,838 s.f 6,587 s.f (25%){20.9%)(23.6%) Structural Coverage Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage 39,150 s.f Allowed: 5,872.5 s.f 15% Existing: 3,8."'6 s.f 9.1% Proposed: 4,499 s.f 11.5% I.ICD 11x17 AM Network I unierii> > LLC ^t2 932 9343 Da:-Ii*M?'. 0MS»-» Frcs-CiTK Cf 0R5f*0 t5;£Z45i318 T-Jil P a:2/0C4 F*54I cirv' OF ORONO - variance application Iniunl Application Ffie $250.00 ($50.00 per each eclditional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SI50.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conformlng structures S2.i0.00 After-thc-Fact Fees (Double application fee) AppbcAtlon It 0 I ~ ^ Date ReceKed ~C / Araoiint Paid S.^^!dO- Property Identlftcation Numbed (P I.D.)_^.7- II'1' 3 ^ W Attach legal description to a^hcatlon if not included on required sunicy. 1 (do) (do not) also own tlw adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property : rcsidentid ___other (specityO,---------------—------------ Zoning Di-^trict;----------------------------------------------------------------------------—— applicant ^ Nanis .OCgrl Ad(hesr~T^d5^rvL*ctLiAQLMi2t Phone (home) ?(• ^ - 6Ts'?- /X ^, ____Phone (work) ext 2^5^ Cirv-: PU.>,, _____Zip: S^ii2-_ OWNER (if difterent than appl’-csni! Name__________...------------- .Address-_________________ _Cirv': Pl'.onC Owmc). Pho.ne (work). Zip; description of RlOUEST Es-Lmated Oj.nstruction Cost S /S^QQO Describe request in detail: /O^ K^h-K^a ArrLhuA ! _"t\)—__— (attach additional sheets if necessary) variances required Lot --krea Lot Width Setback:Front Side Hardco^-er Rear Lot Coverage Aveia^,e Lakcshorc Other (specify) BLARDSHIP/DESCRIPTiON OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or praeiical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with ZoruAS Code rcQuiicmcnts: fixhJu — fZ.h-KP^_________________________ ___-i_______!L--------1------ Tt fei Jll FRANK R. CARDARELLE Land Surveyor, Inc, (0^941.3031 6440 Plying Cloud Drive Land Survey Eden Prairie. MN 553. Certificate ®f ^tirt)ev (L Survey For Douglas i Roban Smith 4i95 Highwood Road Orono, MN Book Page Re 5412 Scale; r'-40' Denotes Iron Mon.Found I Total Land Area:39,15n sf. 75'Lake Setback Area: 11,250 sf Usable Land:27,900 sf Existing Lot Cover; 5838 sf 2U H.C. Prop.Dar. & House: 1103 af ass H.C. House: 2015 sf Garage: 780 SF Sidewalk: 312 sf PorchyDeck & Steps 9 House: 1031 sf Deck & Steps to Lake:832 sf OT Dr<v«i 1700 ef 5838 sf Prop.Gar.Add: 288 sf •' House Add : : 762 sf •' Deck Add. ; 80 sf « Add..H.C.:1130 sf. ?Oth December Frank R. Cardartlle State Reg. No. ssoa lOd T£:21 10. \Z oaQ 0£0£-I1 t6-3S6 : xej likD J JAN-02-02 WED 12:i4 PM Network Instruments^ LLC 612 932 9545 P. 02 Dougtae and Roban Smith 6200 Dcerwood tana North Plymouth, MN SS44? 763^557 6677 December 19.2J01 CityofOrono 2750 KeUy Pailcway P.O.Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Dear Planriing Commission Members: RE: 4195 Highwood Road Variance. Orono, MN Our family recently purchased a home at 4195 Highwood Road. My husband and I and our two young daughters are very excited about cur move to the City of Orono and the opportunity to have a home on such a be:.<utirul lake. As part of our relocation plans, we aro hoping to put a 10' side yard addition onto the existing home in order to. primarily, enlarge the kitchen. We have a growing family and a large extended family, all of which cannot bo accommodated In the existing smaller kitchen space. The proposed Side yard addition would expand the main floor kitchen and adjacent mudroom by 10'. In addition, the two bedrooms below the kitchen would be increased in size by the same 10V A dormer would be added to the second floor bedroom in order to orchestrate the roof lines above the 10' addition. Finally, the construction of an additional 12' wide deep storage space attached to the current garage, as shown on the survey. Is being proposed for constmction. We request yrjur positive considerations of the average setback line variance due to the following reasons and hardships; 1) The proposed renovation project follows the setback and hardcover requirements of the City of Orono. 2) The proposed addition does not extend past the existing lakeshore setback fine created by the current home. 3) Tbe subject property is located on a point of the shoreline making it nearty impossible to meet average lakeshore setbacks from adjacent properties. 4) The steep topography of the subject lot limits any negative view impact of the lake from the adjacent properties windows. 5) Mature trees that exist on the adjacent westerly lot and on the subject property provide natural screening between the two properties. 6) The placement of the original footprint of Ihe subject home predates the lakeshore regulations Given the above unusual conditions which apply to this subject property, we ask you to grant cur request for the lakeshore variance. 7 hank you for your consideraUon. FROM : IMOGIND FAX SYSTEM PHONE NO. : 6519980107 Lcdccs/?<yVL Dec. 13 2001 10:15PM P3 e • Vi) .. .i i.h Hk^-ii 1 =N/ \/^ Lz=lj^it-i—(h s 51 S aJ S'n « iHigfei tiag t w RCMMflMrrH SI •D ^ Kei'.' 'W A RBSOLOTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B) PILE #1628 WHEREAS, Sara J. S. Finney and Mark A. Finney (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 4195 Highwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and leqallv described as follows; y x Lot 26, 27, and 28, Highwood Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit construction of a major addition, replacement of complete foundation beneath the existing residential structure and possible replacemnt of deck and 3-season porch, portions of which are located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Minnesota ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1628. 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Zoning District requiring 43,560 s.f. or 1 acre in area. The property consists of 38,550 s.f. or .88 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 18, 1991 and March 20, 1991 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings and hardships: a)The shape of shoreline as property is located on a point. Steep topography along west side limits any view impact upon lakeview windows of residence on adjacent property. Page 1 of 4 G c) Mature plantings that exist on adjacent western lot and subject property provides natural screening. d) The house was placed on the property prior to lakeshore regu'ations and that all other setback and hardcover standards are met by the proposed improvements. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above hardships and findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit construction of a 20' X 60' addition, replacement of the foundation under the existing residence structure and possible replacement of lakeside deck and 3-season porch, portions of which encroach the avciage lakeshore setback line. Approval is subject to the following conditions; 1. Applicants shall remove 144 s.f. of plastic underline! beneath planter boxes within lakeshore access structure. Plastic underline- sh^.li be removed prior to the Building Inspector's inspection of the footings for new construction. 7. Applicants are hereby placed on notice that deck and access stair structure within the 75' lakeshore protected 'area is nonconforming and subject to all pertinent standards of the Code Any plans to make structural repairs to this structure will require approval of the City of Orono. Page 2 of 4 1991. 3. Applicant is further advised that a conditional use permit is required if a non-rental apartment is to be installed within the basement level of residence. This apartment may never be for rental use* .. granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (April 8, 1992). non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behajf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of their property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of April, ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner(s) -- - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS • COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ^ instrument was acknowledged before me on this 8th day of Aprils 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Dorothy M. Hallin# Mayor a city Clerk of the City of Orono, a Hlnneaota muntclpai corporation and said Instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 4 *.v BT -ft CITY OF ORONO City of ORCWNO ^0-^^ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3v NO.1509 Granting A Variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 34.452 - File 762 t. t • /• t ■ r-- 5 Whereas, Thomas Corson (hereafter “appl icant") is the owner of a property located at 4195 Highwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lots 26, 27 and 29, Highwood Lake Minnetonka (hereafter "property"); and Whereas, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to municipal zoning code section 34.452 to permit the construction of a 24' x 32' detached garage to be located 9.6 feet from the street property line instead of the required 35 feet. Minnesota; Now, Therefore Be It Resolved by the City Council of Orono, Findings 1. This application was reviewed as zoning file no. 762. 2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 18, 1983, and recommended approval of the variance as proposed based upon the following findings: a) Severe slope of land to the immediate south of proposed garage. b) Location of a mature oak and several small trees to the immediate south of proposed garage. c) The proposed setback will allow use of the existing gravel turnaround and cut down on additional hardcover. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the owner and other interested persons, and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district: that granting the variances page 1 of 4 CITY OF QRONQ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1509 would not adversely effect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not me rely serve as a convenience to the owner, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the owner; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Section 34.452 to allow construction of a 24' x 32' detached garage on the property legal ly described above to be located 9.6 feet from the street property line instead of the required 35 feet subject to the following conditions: 1. The detached garage may never be used as a guest house/second residence nor may a home occupation be conducted within the accessory structure. 2. The doors of the detached garage must face away from the street with turnaround provided on the property. 3. The detached garage will not be permitted to have interior plumbing. 4. No other variances are granted or permitted for this structure. 5. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not the the owner , but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 8, 1984). 6. Violation of or noncompliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any author ity granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. -1^ page 2 of 4 L £r \ City of OROIVO • • • ' « 1 • i ■ CITY OF QRQNQ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1509 Adopted by the Otono City Council on this 8th day of August, 1983. ATTEST:CITY OF ORONO City Clerk Proper^^ Owner (s) (3) Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) of ________, 1983, before me a Notary .Public within and for ^said County, personally appeared known to me to 'CU _______ - - - ■ ■ - ---------- - -------------- WW IIIW be the person(s) describedinand who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBiaC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES page 3 of 4 I/ I \ ‘ . S'‘In^tiii^H * . - AT ,-'• <_•' . ^ *, • . • - '. i <5 ' .V : V* 0^ 'iilfllHp^ n'' ‘'•■■ „ ;: ■ •:'#4#S.S,.. ■nir^^SiS; • ‘rv.vw.'fv ^• ' Irtfe j.'~- • ,• ••••" i:Z-*'-'~' uf..^. • . .* s ■ '\i - .t-i^^^.., v-. >(l 'r-^ •^~ M iflL^ ' wp if! * L :i I * i'~ > > •V I >•' Pi ’" J-Mi • W'* v^ ^liiJr PI > ^'(.v ii.’^ ! :m^^m ‘ # • ;' (' </'/ /'■' I / 4 ^ . .lOJV.-. • ■>.. ______/ r J i^un^Taxpayer Servlc^^^^ni on- m-z-'s.- !• ♦ « «. 1 • < « Psrcel Infonnation Parcel ID 0711723440022 House Number 4195 StTMt Nam* HIOHWOOD Rb is is nots data from iegifh^maorded map. it represents a compilation'ofMqnai^on^ n C$t)L Cc^ty, a“^ -------)ty, and State road authorities arni other iyurces. ^ ’ Wim OMt 12/\«l/01 BATCH 50<i PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR Zt 07-117-23 <i3 0009 0003B ADDRESS UNASSICNED UNITED CM MOGP ASSN FAIRVIEW HOSP ASSN ATTN CORP REAL ESTATE 2312 6TH ST S HPLS HN S5959 HUINEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORHATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 07-117-23 93 0010 09199 NORTH SHORE DR UNITED CM HOSP ASSN FAIRVIEW HOSP ASSN ATTN CORP REAL ESTATE 2312 6TH ST S MPLS MN S59S9 REPORT NO. PI935901 PAGE 10 38 07-117-23 93 0011 09199 NORTH SHORE DK UNITED CM HOSP ASSN FAIRVIEW COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ATTN CORP REAL ESTATE 2312 6TH ST S MPLS MN 55959 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 36 07-117-23 99 09199 HIGMWOOD LARRY W KARKELA LARRY W KARKELA 9199 HIGMWOOD RD MOUND MN 55369 0018 RO 38 07-117-23 99 0019 09156 HIGMWOOD RD FRANCES W WILSON FRANCES TESAR 9156 HIGHWOOO RD MOUND MN 55369 38 07-117-23 99 0020 09167 HIGMWOOD RD MERLIN L HALVERSON MERLIN L HALVERSON 9175 HIGHWGOD RD MOUND tIN 55369 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 99 0021 09175 HIGMWOOD RD MERLIN L HALVERSON MERLIN L HALVERSON 9175 HIGHWOOO RO MOUND MN 55369 38 07-117-23 99 0022 09195 HIGMWOOD RD M A FINNEY « S J FINNEY MARK < SARA FINNEY 9195 HIGMWOOD RD MOUND MN 55369 38 07-117-23 99 0023 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL ASSN FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL ASSN ATTN CORP REAL ESTATE 2312 6TH ST S MPLS MN 55959 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 99 0029 09190 HIGMWOOD RD D P BOWEN ISM DOWNS B P BOWEN ISM DOWNS 9190 HIGMWOOD RD HOUND MN 55369 38 07-117-23 99 0025 09182 HIGMWOOD RD S A I J W RICHARDS II SARAH A I JOHN W RICHARDS 9182 HIGMWOOD RO MOUND MN 55369 38 07-117-23 99 0026 09179 HIGMWOOD RD H B DEVAAN & L E DEVAAN HERBERT I LORETTA DEVAAN 17605 SUSAN DR MINNETONKA MN 55395 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 07-117-23 99 0027 09166 HIGHWOOO RD R D I A L RUMSCH ROBERT I AMY RUMSCH 9166 HIGHWOOO RD MOUND MN 55369 38 07-117-23 99 0028 09150 HIGMWOOD RD J L BAKKE ISM GLYTTN JON L BAKKE 9150 HIGMWOOD RD MOUND MN 55369 38 07-117-23 99 09198 HIGMWOOD JANET L EIDE JANET L EIDE 9198 HIGHWOOO RD HOUND MN 55369 0029 RO PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 ,07-117-23 99 0030 09190 HICHWOOD RD J D CUSACK ACM GRACE C GRACE I J CUSACK 9190 HICHWOOD RD MOUND MN 55369 38 07-117-23 99 0075 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO P 0 BOX 66 CRYSTAL DAY MN 55323 TOTAL BATCH 509 00017 f/J _ _ _ _ , • .•V.hardcover calculation worksheet SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 75-250* 250-500* EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ______• X ■ _____________ *= M 500-1000* Leofth Widdi B. Garage m C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Pacio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X X X X X X /. J G. Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ,, ^ - A B /lasD. PRQPC.SED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ________ ■ Lco|Ch Width B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 O. Oiher TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A ^^<9- + B //^SO xlOO ^ I ' XlOO S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. [S.F. S.F. I S.F. S.F. S.F. 'S.F. S.F. S.F. A S.F. B % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. _S.F. WORKSHEET ' 250-500’500-1000’ / TO:Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc, City Administrator FROM: DATE: Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner January 16,2002 SUBJECT:#02-2744 Steve Harris on behalf of Paul Jehneox 2948 Casco Point Road Variance — Public Hearing Staff reviewed application #02-2744 and it w as determined that a v ariance was not needed. The application has been withdrawn and a refund will be issued. / ' TO: FROM: DATE Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorsc. City Administrator l*aul Weinberger. Zoning Administrator/Pl.inner January 4, 2002 SUBJECT: ^02-2743 Thomas J. Dimsmore - Orono Town Office 2525/2535/2545 Shadywood Road Concept Plan Review - Sketch Plan Review Zoning District: 2535/2545 Shads wood Road - B-4. Ofllce and Professional Business District 2525 Shadswood Road - LR-IB, One Pamilv l.akeshore Residential District List of Exhibits: A n C D E F G II I Application Plat Map Engineer Comments (Januar> 3. 2002) Site Plan Site Plan Surrounding Properties Zoning Land Use Map Sewer Service Map Water Service Map Sewer/Water Storm Water Assessment Anaivsis Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.43 - li-4. OITicc and Professitmal District standards. Section 10.24 -1 R-IR. One I amilv I.akeshirre Residential District Section 10.56 - Shoreland Overlay District Standards Application Summary: .Applicant has proposed a 9 unit oUlce development on a 3.7 acre property located at 2525 2535 and 2545 Shadywood Road. The proposed ofllce buildings would be one story. si.\ ol which would be 2.530 s.l.. and three 2.120 s.f. Ihe intent is to sell each indisidual building into independent ownerships and plat a common area to be owned by the building owner.ship group. I he common area would contain the shared parking facilities, ponds, landscaped areas, and sidewalks. Applicants are requesting conceptual approval of the site plan including discussion of a proposed CMP Amendment and re/oning to change the land use of the portion of the property zoned residential to allow the property to be re/.oned to commercial. Because this application includes a re/oning component from resident:.. to commercial, the item will be reviewed by the City Council following Planning Commission review.________________ •020743 Ihomav J Dunsmcrc - Oromi lvn%n Oirue 2525/2535/2545 Shjd>A%oiHJ Rood 1/2202 Page 1 uf 4 Proposed Dcvcionmcnt The cast '/i of the property proposed for de\ elopment is zoned B-4 and is guided for commercial use by the Comprehensive Flan (CMF). 1 he z.oning code states the district is intended to prov ide a district which is related to and may adjoin residential districts or other business districts for the location of administrative office buildings and related offices. 1 he office uses allowed in this district are those in which there is limited contact with the public and no exterior display or selling ol merchandise to the general public. The district shall have immediate access to adequate highways and public sanitary sewer. Offices are a permitted use in the li-4 district. Permitted/Conditional Residential U.ses in I.R-IB district The west Vj of the proposed development is zoned residential. Any office use would require the property to be rezoned. Under the current zoning district the property could be used for single family residential use. Another residential option on the property would be a “duplex”. A duplex could be constructed on the property only after approval of a conditional use permit by the City Council. One duplex may be located on a single lot as a conditional use provided that public sanitarv' sewer service is available, the lot is adjacent to a commercial district and the duplex is constructed within 200' of the commercial district, further the duplex must be built on a lot that meets minimum lot size and lot width standards for the district. Code Kevievv/Flatting Process: The Zoning Ordinance does not have a process that would allow the proposed development. A FI il) process is only available to commercial properties located within Highway 12 Development Corridor. Froperties in the B-4 di.strict are required to have a minimum lot size of 20.000 s.f and a lot width of 100'. Required building setbacks are 35' to a front property line. 1 5' to a side property line and 35' to property line adjacent to an “R". residential district. The proposed plat can be compared to a ‘■t»)wn house ” plat, where each individual building is located on an individual lot. In thiscase. individual lots would have a lot area of 2.100 s.f to 2.500 s.f and the buildings would hav e a zero setback to the property lines. * Required Code Amendment A process would be required to be established to allow commercial properties to have the Ilexibility to allow the development to create individual building lots that would allow 0 setbacks and lots less than 20.000 s.f in the zoning district. It Wi)uld require the City of Orono adopt a new FUD process for commercial properties. ResiJeniuilly zoned property can develop as either a Flanned Residential Development (FRD) or a Residential Flanned Unit Development (RFI T)). Both the FRD and RFUD give the City tlexibilitv in zoning requirements for residential properties. •02-2743 Ihoma> J Durumorc • Oruno I own OlVicc 2.^25/2535-ShaJvvMHid Koatl 1/2102 Pa|c 2 of 4 Other cities have adopted PUD ordinances that would allow commercial developments, such as this proposed development. Each PUD would be reviewed to determine if the developments meets the intent of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and if it is compatible with the vision and needs of the City and surrounding properties. Parking Requirements Parking areas are required to be 20' to the front property line. The B-4 district allows parking to within 3 ’ of side property lines, except property lines adjacent to an “R" district require a setback of 10'. The property will be required to dedicate drainage and utility easements 10' around the perimeter of the property. It is appropriate to not construct parking areas within the casement area. The property is also surrounded mostly by residential property and therefore it should be required all parking meet a 1 O' side setback. The additional setback area would allow for planting of trees or other vegetative screening along the property lines. Total parking spaces required for office building use is one space per 200 s.f of floor area. The proposed plan requires 98 parking spaces based on the total usable floor area of the buildings. 98 parking spaces arc shown on the plan. Surrounding Land Use The east '/? of the proposed property is adjacent to property located in the B-4 zoning district and west '/j of the property is adjacent to property located in the I.R-I B district. North of the site is the Baywinds church property which is used primarily as a church, but docs have a small amount of office space for lea.se. South of the property is a private residence also used as a tax office. Properties on each side of the property, and adjacent to Kelly Avenue, are residential. Please refer to Exhibit E. which details zoning and land use of adjacent properties. Surface Water Management Plan 1 he City's new SWMP has identified a need for a regional water quality pond located somewhere near this site. The proposed pond shown is designed only to treat the runoff created by this development. Staff will continue to work with the developer to address the regional stormwater needs. Additional comments regarding engineering is.sues are listed in the City Engineer’s comments attached as lixhibit C. Sewer and Water .Serv ice The property has municipal sewer and water available. Service is available in the Shady^vood Road right-of-way. 1 he property has paid partial assessments for sewer and water serv ice. The paid assessments are summarized on Exhibit I. Any fees due would include payments for 9 units based on the proposed site plan. •02-2743 Thomas J f>unsmofe • Orono To%kn Office 2525/2535/7545 Shad>\%ood Road 1/22/02 Pagc3or4 Public Works has indicated the sewer service would be available along the south and cast property lines. Water service is available along Shadywood Road. An 8" water service would be required to be installed along the north s'de of the new buildings where each individual service eould directly connect. Primar}’ Issues for Discussion: 1. Re/oning the property would make the west 'A of the property usable for office space. Is office use an appropriate use for the property? Is the office use compatible with the residential uses immediately adjacent to the property? 2. Should the City review the option of creating a PUD ordinance that would allow commercial developments, sueh as that proposed by the applicant? Without a PUD ordinance the proposed development could not happen with separate lots for each office building. OPTIONS FOR ACTION To make recommendations on issues relating to the proposed site plan. The following list summari/es the issues for discussion. A. Re/oning and change to guided use of the west V2 of the property to Commercial from Residential. B. Property Layout C. Parking/Access D. Landscaping/Ponding What is required to approve the proposed development? Approval of the propo.sed development will require an application for the follow ing: I. ”>• 3. 4. Preliminary Plat for the 9 unit office development. Comprehensive Plan Amendment for a land u.se change from residential to commercial for the Kelly Avenue properly. Re/oning the Kelly Avenue propert> from residential (LR-1B) to commercial (B-4). * PUD for a commercial development. * requires City adopt a PUD process for commercial developments •02-2743 Thomas J Dunsmore • Orono Town Office 2525^535/2545 Shad.vwood Road 1/22/02 Page 4 of 4 'J( Q O OFORO^O - ilinDIVIsfeN ^SpC ication Application ff________ Date Received n-n-oi Amount Paid ^275 Ol-3'lM3. A PROPERTY LOCATION Sileaddress Zi'iy/nvj e..A ZS2S tu.tlv Aaoioi- Property Identification Number (PID) ------------- Please check one - Property____abstract or Attach legal description to application. torrens? APPLICANT NamejnTSorfvai > X. PutM^arcy^^Ti.______ Address \\Mr\ft V..a>b\VWiftr c»rioMy^ Cit> Hi/vsj rvW __Phone (home) Zip^v^ Phone (work) OWNER (if different than applicant) j Name A.ft “T- Address SC? (^c^\JcCrrc- I JL U^vi-:>.L\r /v\^ : Phone (home) (attach list irmore than one) EXISTING LAND USE Number of Ta.x Parcels Development Size Present use (check) Present Zoning District ^'P iSQTJ ’hone (work) 3^ Acres Diy Land Acres W’et Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify)______ PROPOSAL __________ Division for Tax Purposes _________ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) _________Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites _________Existing Units _________New Units _______ Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size Proposed Use(check) _ Units per___Acres _ Sq. Ft. Dr> Buildable Land _ Residential _ Other (specify)_________ ObsK)ar 9 Cojt^(-%). a f /Vo >. l£'3L\ '^. t'X' y >v%. «vP ‘i?re// ^vAvTi ^i'hof \-^ A \^- Be*90l 091 3./.S.CI.{'>N mamry *■ 3 Ll 69'6^2 / wusMjmoj. ^------------------------- (n; c> Art 69*2.12 092 ^9 96*^22 iros2 <i: ISC M.09,^C •2Vsi2'09C vy "'r" ^ J Bonestroo Rosene mn ■ Anderlik & \ Associates Engineers & Architects January 3, 2002 Paul Weinberger Zoning Administralor/Planner City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Cry stal Bay. MN 55323 He: Orono Town Office File No. 139-01-000 Dear Paul; cBoncitfoo. Poicnc. Af^dcrlik and Asto<iJtei. Inc it an Affirmaiive Action, Equal Oppoffunity Employer and Employee Owned Pfincipali Otto G Bcneit.oo P£ • Marvm l Sorva'a PE • G'rnn P Cook PE • Robert G Scnun.cht Pf • Jerry A Bou'dof' PE Senior Consultants Robert W Rosene Pf • Joseph C Anderlik PE • Richard f Turner PE • SuS.»rs V! Eber'.n c PA Associate Principals-Keith A Gordon PE • Robert R Pfefferie PE • R.chard X Foster PC .D.i..dO Ictk .v* PE • Pt ,i»ir A H p£ • ViChael T Rautrrann. PE • Ted K F*eld PE • Kenneth P Ande'son. P£ • V.»rk R Ro'ts P£ • Dav J A B ;«'eviroo MBA • S.drey P X liamson PE L S • Agnei M R nq VBA • Aaan Rifk Sf^m.dt PE • Thomas M Petersen P£ • James R Maiand PC • Vi«es B Jensen Pf • i Ph.ii-o Grawr*' i:i P[ • Damn j Ed j**f*or' Pf • Isrraei V.u! r>e/ PI • Tnomas A Syf«o PE • Sheidcn j Jornson • Dar.? A Gro^e P£ • Thomas A Rou:h,«r p£ • Robert J De;<ery Pf Offices. St Paul St Cloud Rochester anj X'i!irrar VN • Milwaukee Xi • Ch.c *gr^ H Ui^btiler war wbohestroo com . A, c. We have reviewed the sketch plan for the Orono Town Office complex located at 2525 Shadywood Road. Wc have the following comments with regards to engineering matters; • The proposed ponding design provides for a maximum pond depth of 2.85 feet. At a minimum the pond should be designed to provide an average depth of 4-fcct and a maximum depili ol 8-feet. The pond design should provide an outlet structure for rate control and I -foot of skimminit to the lOO-ve i. evem. • It is assumed that the proposed pond will discharge to the existing wetland south and west of the pond. The invert of the discharge pipe at the wetland should be set at the wetland normal water level (NWL) of 929.8. riie proposed NWL of the pond is .shown at 928.0. It is unclear how this system will work given the pond NWL is lower than the wetland. • The site lies primarily within the Lafayette B;iy drainage area as identified in the City’s draft Surface Water Management Pl;in (SWMP). The SWMP also identifies the need for a regional water quality pond located somewhere ne;u- this site. This may be an opportunity to address some existing regional drainage concerns. W e would encourage the developer to consider incorporating a regional pond into their site plan. • The storm water calculations provided assume treating only mnoff created by this develo()ment. A regional pond would be required to treat the entire area draining to the pond. • Lot 3 appears to be land locked. Access easements to Lot 3 w ill need to be prov ided across Lots I and If you have any questions please call me at (651) 604-4863. Yours very truly, BONF-STROO. ROSENI-. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATE.S. INC. /on Tom Kellogg Cc; Greg Gappa. City of Orono 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 65I-636-4600 • Fax; 651-636 1311 %Y vpv (1173) g''SS / (♦■SB L = 50 • # •..'O ' €. ;;G3 ISIS i •.;•■’•• '■• .• /• r » ' ,\ 1 if . V •. %• • • • A '* ^; • 4 : _ I * • -2^S^S • • * • :vpH' •• t ^ / ' ' *•'“ • i’ •' v; ' • V -.* :'■ '1 ■ • . ; ! •• . ■ . -V •■•.■"••■ ' /: - ••• • • . .. ■ •»• ••• *;% , «« • • •.• •> - '•(8 GY tsM. imam I DATE: TO: City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 Phone: (952) 294-4600 Fax: (952) 249-4616 MEMORANDUM Januaiy 14,2002 File #02-2743 FROM:Paul Weinberger, 2Loning Administrator SUBJECT: Orono Town Ofiice Development Sewer/Water/Stormwater Assessment Analysis ______2525/2535/2545 Shadywood Road Water 1970 Water Assessment: Project 1970 LW-1 Original Project Assessment Amounts:$870 per commercial unit $8.70 per commercial front foot Total Assessment Paid (5 commercial units X $870) + (250* frontage X $8.70) = $6,525 1999 Navarre Upgrade Original Project Assessment Amounts: $350 per unit Total Assessment (3 units X $350)« $1,050 Sewer 1964 LS-IB Original Assessment Amounts:$8.15 per front fool Total Assessment Paid (500’ frontage X $8.15) = $4,075 Scwcr/Water/Stormwater Assessment Analysis 2525/2535/2545 Shadywood Road Paee 2 of 2_____________ 1963-lB and IB plant charge Levy #3302 (Trunk $1 10/acre) and #3299 (plant #225/unit) Original Assessment Amounts:trunk $110 per acre plant $225 per unit Total Assessment Paid (3.81 acres X $110) = $419.10 + (1 unit plant charge X $225) = $644.10 * Trunk sewer from Navarre area to treatment plant 1984 LS #7 upgrade Would owe $565 per commercial unit for the LS #7 upgrade fee. Would owe $1,630 per residential unit, jf properties were vacant in 1984 the properties would not have been credited for a residential unit. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee.s 2002 Assessment Amount:$6,480 per acre Total Assessment Due: (3.8 acres X $6,480) = $24,624 Summary: Water; Credited with 5 paid water units (1970 LW-1 Commercial) Credited with 3 paid water unites (1999 Plant Rehab) The followinu arc based on 2002 Fee Schedule Fee for additional units (1970 LW-1 Commercial) = $3,560/unit Fee for additional units (1999 Plant Rehab) = $390/unit Sewer: Front footage; paid, regardless of number of units Acreage; Paid, regardless of number of units Plant Charge; Defunct Fee, no longer charged 1984 LS #7; The ofllce development will owe $565/commercial unit (2002 Fee Schedule) Residential units will owe $1,63 0/residential unit (2002 Fee Schedule) MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o’clock p.ni. ROLL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chair Elizabeth Hawn, Commissioners Dale Lindquist, Daniel Kluth, Sandra Smith, and Jeanne Mabusth, and William Stoddard. Alternates J. Marc I ritzier, and David Rahn were present. Commissioners Janice Berg and Daniel Kluth were absent. The follow ing represented City Staff: Planning Director Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, and Recorder Jackie Young. Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA (#01-2729) W. GREGORY COWARD, JR., 1950 HERITAGE DRI\T. VARIANC I S (#01-2733) WILLIA.M B. AND !A NNE M. L. PETERSON, 420 ORCHARD PARK ROAD. RENEWAL VARIANCES Hawn inquired whether there were any members of the audience who would like to speak regarding these applications. There \sere no public comments regarding either application. Hawn inquired whether the garage being constructed by the Cowards consists of more than just a garage. Robert Lund, Representing the Cowards, stated the structure is a three-stall garage, but the properts owner decided to make the garage look like something other than a garage. Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application ^01-2729, W. Gregory Coward, Jr., 1950 Heritage Drive, granting of a conditional use permit to permit two accessory buildings to be located on the property as depicted on the site plan dated 11/9,01, subject to the conditions outlined in the November 13, 2001 Planner's Report. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. (Stoddard was not present for this vote) Hawn moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of #01-2733, William B. and Lynne M. L. Peterson, 420 Orchard Park Road, to e.\tend the variance application deadline and forssard the application for review to the City Council on Mondav, November 26, 2001. VOTE: Aves7,NavsO. OLD BUSINESS (#3) #01-2722 MICH.4EL AND MONICA BROW’N, 1241 BROW N RO.VD SOUTH, N’ARIANCES Michael Brown, Applicant, was present. PAGE I MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o’clock p.m. (#01-2722 Michael and Monica Rnmn, Continued) Weinberger stated the Planning Commission had reviewed this application at its October meeting and tabled it to allow the property owner to consider options to the site plan in relation to garage si/c and setbacks. \Veinbcrger stated Brown Road is considered to be the front property line and Minnetonka Avenue being considered the side yard adjacent to street. The Applicants arc requesting variances to permit the replacement of an c.xisting garage with a 28 ’ by 24’ detached garage. I he Applicant is now proposing to construct the same si?e garaae as originally proposed with the location of the garage being slightly changed. The Applicants have indicated 'they arc agreeable to moving the garage back an additional five feet from the property line resulting in a 10-foot setback rather than six feet. There would be a live-loot setback to the allev, which is aareeable to Staff since the City docs not intend to develop ihc alley as a traveled road, ciirrentlv the a1le> is used for electric service. The Applicant did state he has a hardship due to the location of a mature pine tree that is located behind the garage with approximately a 35-foot drip line. 1 he Applicant is unable to move the cara-^c any further back due to the location of this tree. ^ ^ The Applicants have also agreed to redi.ee the si?c of the outside parking area to approximatelv a 15-foot width in order to accommodate some off-street parking. Weinberger stated the second part ol tlie application deals with the Applicant proposina to replace an existing fence that is six feet in height within the side yard adjacent to street setback where a maximum height fence is allowed to be 3.5 feet. The fence is intended to be a privaev fence to the back vard The fence is currently located 27 feet from the properly line. Weinberaer noted the Plannina '' Commission at its previous meeting did indicate general support for the fence heiaht variance fhe Applicants would like to increase the size of their back vard and relocate a portion of the fence in order to meet a 15-loot setback. Staff recommends approval of the variances to permit replacement of the fence within 50 feet of the street property line and replacement of the existing garaee. Brown stated he has spoken with his neighbor regarding this project, who has indicated he is suDDortivc of the project and is willing to help with the landscaping. Brown commented thev are plannin-to n| .nt some arborvitae m the yard and to reduce the size of the outdoor parking an as much as possible. ' Stoddard inquired whether any cars parked in the driveway would stick out into the street w ith the proposed new location of the garage. Brown stated the garage is proposed to be located 22 feet from the road. Brown stated in his view the change m the location of the fence will improve the look of the property. Brown indicated he is planning to erect a decorative fence rather than the current stockade fence. There were no public comments regarding this application. Smith inquired why the Applicant would like a six-foot fence versus a 3.5-foot fence PAGE 2 - MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COM\HSSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2001 6:30 o’clock p.m. (#01-2722 Michael and Monica Brown, Continued) Brown stated the fence is intended for privacy due to the amount of traffic on Minnetonka Avenue. Smith inquired how many cars the parking area would be able to accommodate. Brown stated he would have the ability to park three cars outside. Mabusth noted the current fence is located 25 feet off the right-of-way. Mabusth inquired how close the new fence would be located to the property line. Weinberger stated it is his understanding the fence would be constructed 15 feet off the right-of-way, which would be 27 feet from the p^ved roadway. Smith inquired why the garage could not be moved closer to the house. Brown stated there is a larger Cottonwood tree that is not depicted on the drawing that essentially covers the entire yard. Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to maintain the pine tree. Tliat would prohibit moving the garage to the north. Mo\ ing the garage to the east may impact the cottonwood. Hawn commented in her view this plan is an improvement over the previous plan submitted by the Applicant. Smith stated she is not fully supportive of a six-foot fence. Lindquist stated he is willing to support this current proposal, noting he does not have a problem w ith the six-foot fence since this is a comer lot. Stoddard stated he agrees with Lindquist. Rahn stated if the garage were located fiv e feet closer to the street and is side-loading, a variance w ould not be needed. Weinberger stated if the garage were located five feet closer to the street, it would be closer to the street than the principal building, and the garage w ould be located w ithin 50 feet of the property line. Rahn stated he does not really understand the hardship here since the garage could be side loading. Brown indicated all the garages in this neighborhood are front loading garages. Hawn inquired why this garage could not be side loading. Brown stated in his view the appearance of the garage would not look as nice if it were side loading. Mabusth stated if the garage was located at the same 28-foot setback and the doors were turned, in her opinion it would be encroaching into the right-of-way. PAGE 3 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o'clock p.m. (#01-2722) Michael and Monica Brown, Continued) Rahn stated he was not thinking of rotating the structure but merely changing the location of the doors into the garage. Hawn noted the Applicant would prefer to have a front loading garage since there are no other side loading garages in the neighborhood. Mabusth concurred that is the pattern of development in thit area. Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #01-2722, Michael and Monica Brow n, 1241 Brown Road South, granting of variances to permit replacement of a si.x foot fence w ithin 50 feet of the street property line, and granting of variances to permit a 10 foot side yard adjacent to the street .setback and a five foot setback to the alley based on the findings that the proposed garage meets the development pattern of surrounding properties along iVIinnetonka .Avenue and the alley is not intended to he used for roadwav purposes. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 1, Rahn Opposed. Hawn requested the Applicant have an architectural drawing prepared for Staff review showinu all the setbacks and e.xact location of the garage prior to the City Council meetinu. Rahn stated he voted against the motion because in his view a side-loading garage would meet the setbacks and would not require a variance. Rahn stated in his view he does not see a hardship for the variance. NEW BUSINESS (#4) #01-2730 ACE PROPERTIES, 3375 C RVSTAL BAY ROAD, VARIANCES, 6:48 p.m. - 7:28 p.m. Larry Palm and Gary Gniftke. Ace Properties, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting variances to permit redevelopment of the property The proposal is to remove the e.xisting house and construct a new residence, with a ''4- bv 40' concrete storage building that is attached to the house but is not living space to remain. The concrete buildin- was constructed in 1971, sometime after the house was originally constructed. The Applicants are ^ proposing to retain three walls, the rear and sides, from the e.xisting storage buildin- bcin- used as n ,rt of the foundation for the new house. " =• » P**n Weinberger stated the lot consists of 6.690 square feet and lies within the LR-IC One Family Lakeshorc Residential District, which has a one-half acre minimum lot size. The total area outside »r the 75-foot setback is 3 855 square feet. The proposed house would be a two and a halfTto^ ou e with a defined height of 26 feet. The existing house is one and a half stories. Variances arc being requested to lot area and lot width to permit construction of the new resident, on ot that is less than one-halTacre and only 50 feet wide at the lakeshore and deHned structure setb^t In addition, variances are being requested for hardcover and structure w ithin 75 feet of the lakesh MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2001 6:30 o'clock p.m. (#01-2730 Acc Properties, Continued) where no hardcover or structure is allowed, and a variance to permit greater than 25 percent hardcover in the 75-250’ of the lakeshorc. The Applicants are proposing 19.5 percent hardcover w ithin the 0-75' setback where 37.9 percent currently e.xists and are proposing 60 percent hardcover within the 75-250’ setback. Currently there is 72.5 percent hardcover within this setback area. Variances are also required to permit encroachment into the 10-foot side/rear vard setbacks, and to permit the existing foundation and building to be located 4.2 feet from the side property line and 19.2 feet to the rear lot line. The proposed setbacks are existing for the concrete storage building that would remain on the property. The Applicants arc proposing to have two full stories constructed above the concrete storage building that would expand the building envelope w ithin all required setbacks. Tlie Applicants are also requesting variances to permit structural lot coverage in excess of 1.500 square feet. The Zoning Ordinance permits lot coverage of up to 1,500 square feet for lots under 10.000 square feet of area. The proposed house is 1,895 square feet. A variance is also being requested to permit a two foot encroachment into the average lakeshore setback as well as variances to permit expansion to the structure located w ithin 10 feet of an adj.icent structure on an adjacent property. Weinberger stated the City in 1971 approved variances to permit a 20' by 24' detached concrete storage building located 10 feet behind the existing house. The City issued a building permit a few months later for a 24' by 40’ concrete attached building. This is the existing building that is proposed to remain on the property and u.sed as foundation for the back half of the new house. Technically the building was not approved by a variance but a building permit was issued for the structure. Weinberger noted the Applicant has been requested to submit a site grading and drainage plan for Staff review. Staff is recontmending a reduction in the amount of structural coverage on the lot to not encroach into the side v ard setbacks, but is recommending approval of the variances to lot area and lot w irlth as well as rear setback and hardcover variances. Palm indicated he has nothing to add to Staff s report. There were no public comments regarding this application. Hawn stated in her opinion the amount of structural coverage proposed for this lot is excessive, noting this is basically new construction. Hawn stated she does not sec a reason to grant a variance to the structural coverage in the amount proposed, noting this would be a very large structure on a very small lot. Palm stated he has spoken with both adjoining neighbors regarding this project who have signed a letter indicating their support of this project. Palm stated there arc also two or three other houses within this neighborhood that arc of similar size located on a small lot. Palm stated their intent is to narrow the old foundation by 20 feet, which leaves them pretty close to the ten foot setback, with only the rear portion of the foundation remaining. PAGE 5 MINUTES OF THK ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETLNG MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o’clock p.m. are (#01-2730 Ace Properties, Continued) Lindquist commented in his view this should be considered as a tear-down and a rebuild, and recommended the structural coverage be limited at 15 percent. Mabusth noted there are concerns regarding drainage in this area. Mabusth inquired whether there any other drainage problems that the City is aware of in this area. Weinberger stated a concern has arisen regarding drainage in this area due to the amount of new construction that is occurring and the amount of hardcover that exists. Palm stated the lot docs have open space on either side of the house. Weinberger stated Staff would review the drainage once a Hnal site plan has been arrived at. Stoddard stated he docs not have a problem with most of the variances being requested, but in his view there should be a side yard setback of 10 feet. Stoddard recommended the structural coverace also be reduced. Stoddard suggested the Applicant also take into account the averace lakeshore setback when redesigning his plan. Palm stated the average setback would be determined from the existing concrete foundation. Rahn indicated he has a concern regarding the view of the neighbors if this size structure is constructed Palm stated the proposed residence is the same height as the neighbor to the west. Palm stated thev trying to accommodate the City, noting it is less cost effective if they arc required to redesien their plan. arc Hawn stated the Planning Commission typically does not grant variances to structural coverage on new construction. Hawn stated tn her view the only hardship is the small size of the lot, which doesn't drive the granting ol this number of variances according to State Statute. Hawn stated hardships tvoicallv run with the topography of the land. r . f Hawn commented it appears to be the consensus of the Planning Commission that the plan before them tonight IS not something they arc willing to support. Hawn stated the Applicant has the option of having the Planning Commission vote on this application tonight or to table it. «e"fonhis lof ® "hat type of house they would like to Hawn recommended the structural coverage be limited to 15 percent. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that structural coverage should be limited to I 500 squar« teet and that variances to lot width and lot area are appropriate. HawTi noted the proposed side y ard setbacks are also an issue that will need to be addre«eH u mqutred whether the Applicant would like this application tabled in order to give him time to “ vise his PAGE 6 MLVUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNLNG COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o’clock p.m. (^01-2730 Ace Properties, Continued) Palm stated he would like to have it tabled. Stoddard moved, Mabusth seconded, to table Application «01-2730, Ace Properties, 3375 Crystal Bay Road, to allow the Applicant time to revise his plans. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (US) #01-2732 REVTS L. STEPHENSON, lU., 1850 FOX RH)GE RO.\D, CO.NDITIONAL USE PERi\UT, 7:30 p.m. - 7:58 p.m. Revis Stephenson, Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant has requested a conditional use permit to permit land alteration over 500 cubic yards on the property located at 1850 Fo.\ Ridge Road. The project would consist of clear cutting the slope and depositing appro.ximately 3.280 cubic yards of fill. The purpose of the project is to create a gradual slope rather than the e.xisting steep drop from the immediate back yard of the house. The source of the fill is from the Orono Woods apartment building located at the northwest comer of Highway 12 and Brown Road. Weinberger stated a conditional use permit is required for land alteration greater than 500 cubic yards. The slope on this lot is not located within a shoreland area. Weinberger stated some existing less mature trees would be removed w ithin the intent of the Applicant to replant once the 1111 is placed on the hillside. 1 he Applicant is also proposing to plant additional trees and natural grasses. Weinberger stated it is not the intent of the Applicant to maintain this area as lawn but as a natural area. Weinberger stated approximately 300 truck loads of fill will be delivered to the site. The source of the nil is from the senior apartment building site located at Highway 12 and Brown Road. The City Engineer has expressed some concerns about the potential damage to Fox Ridge Road, which is a City street, given the number of truck loads that will be traveling over this road. Staff is recommending the property owner provide some type of Bnancial guatantee that could Fe used to correct any damage caused by the contractors' activities. Weinberger stated a utility easement is located througi •>. perty, which was granted in the 1970s as part of a Metropolitan Council project. The sewer m *'.as never constructed and portions of the original easement located over the 20 acre property north of the Luce Line Trail was vacated years ago when it was determined the line would not be constructed. The easement located across this propertv and other lots in the Fox Ridge neighborhood has not been vacated. Staff is requesting input from the Metropolitan Council on the future use of this easement and whether it can be vacated' StatT is recommending approval of the application based on the following conditions: 1 . A determination is made by all agencies with rights to the utility easement that 12 feet of fill can be located over the easement. 2. A letter should be submitted by the property owner indicating that two silt fences would be installed to protect the existing wetland, and that the silt fence would be installed prior to any tree removal or land alteration. PAGE 7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO^L\USSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o’clock p.m. (#01-2732 Revis Stephenson, Continued) 3. The MCWD shall issue an erosion control permit prior to issuance of a land alteration permit. 4. The flushing station located on the property shall be protected by fencing to ensure it will not be damaged during the project. 5.All slopes shall be restored with a minimum of fou'' inches of topsoil and seeded or restored w ith some type of erosion control measure, erosion control plan shall be approved by the MCWD and City Engineer. 6. The property owner provide some type of financial guarantee that could be used to correct an\ damage to the road caused by the contracfo. ’s activities. 7. Fox Ridge Road is a residential street. The contractor shall place siens on Fox Ridce Road alertinu other users of the road w here the w ork .vill be taking place. 8. Temporary fencing shall be installed around the construction activity to separate the land alteration activity from the surrounding property. Stephenson stated he is adamant about protecting the wetlands in this area and is agreeable with most of the conditions listed in the Planner’s Report. Stephenson requested clarification of Item «6 relating to the financial guarantee. Stephenson commented he was infomicd bv the contractor that the road should not be damaged, noting the road currently is in poor shape. Stephenson stated the neighbors are supportive of this project since it will eliminate the steep slope, and that his intentions are to pi int native grasses and trees in this area to help restore the area back to its natural state. Mabusth suggested the Applicant discuss the financial guarantee with the contractor. Weinberger stated the work is not expected to start until mid December, and if the ground is frozen bv then, the hauling of the fill will not be a:, big of a concern. ^ Stephenson indicated he has no control over when the fill will be brought in. with the proiect evnectim. to take between five and six days. ^ ‘ ^ Smith inquired whether the impact on the wetland over time would be better or worse with this project. Weinberger stated the City Engineer has indicated that the rate of water runoff will slow dow n bv Hawn recommended a deadline of May 30. 2002 be required for the landscaping and planting. Stephenson stated he docs not have a problem with that requirement. r^emov^'''^^'^ " Applicant would be planting the same number of trees that will be PAGES MINUTES OF THE ORONO planning COMMISSION MEETLNG MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o'clock p.m. (#01-2732 Revis Stephenson, Continued) Stephenson stated he would like this area to be well-forested and intends to plant natural prairie grasses as well as pine trees, oaks, maples, and apple trees. Stephenson stated that currently the majority of the trees consist of box elders that w ill be removed as part of this project as well as two maple trees. Stephenson reiterated that the road presently is in poor condiiion and that he has a concern regarding a financial guarantee. Lindquist stated the City needs to have a letter of security on file prior to the commencement of this project. Stephenson inquired what amount the City would be requesting. Gaffron recommended the City Engineer and the Public Works Director meet w ith the Applicant to discuss the current condition of the roadw ay and document any existing problems. Gaffron recommended this item be left up to the City Engineer and the Public Works Director to determine what the appropriate amount of security would be. Gaffron suggested the Applicant speak with Gappa following the hearing. Stephenson stated he is agreeable to do that. Gaffron inquired when the Applicant is proposing to place the black dirt on the propertv. Stephenson stated he would like to do that at the time he does the planting. Gaffron recommended the d. idlinc for completion of the planting be moved to June 30*’’ to avoid problems with winter road restrictions. Frit/ler inquired whether the entire fill would be spread this year. Stephenson stated the fill would be spread in conjunction with the dumping. F.-itzler expressed a concern that the dirt m.ay freeze before the contractor would be able to sprc.id it. Fri/ler suggested the Applicant also advise the contractor to do periodic cleanup of the road, noting the contractor is prohi’ ’ ;d from leaving anything on the ro.idway. Stephenson indicated they would comply with the applicable laws. Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #01-2732, Revi.s I,. Stephenson, III., 1850 Fox Ridge Road, granting of a conditional use permit to permit land alteration over 500 cubic yards on the property located at 1850 Fox Ridge Road, subject to the conditions outlined in the November 13, 2001 Planner's Report, and further subject to total restoration of the area being completed by June 30,2002. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. PAGE 9 MINUTES OF TIIF. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o'clock p.m. (#6) «01-2734 MARGIE NEWTON, 505 ORCHARD PARK ROAD, VARI ANCE, 7:59 p.m. - 8:09 p.m. Margie Newton, Applicant, and Thomas Bren, Contractor, were present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a variance to permit an e.xisting horse bam to remain on the property located closer to the front property line than the new proposed house. Orono’s Zoning Ordinance prohibits accessory buildings from being located closer to the front property line than a principal structure. Weinberger stated the Applicant is proposing to construct a 621 square foot addition to the bam The proposed building woald be 1,700 square feet. Any building over 1,000 square feet is considered an oversized aeccssoiy building. The bam location meets standards required for special setback regulations that apply to private bams and stables. The Applicant currently has two horses on the property that she would like to retain. Weinberger stated new soil testing and septic design has been submitted by the Applicant and approved by the Citv ’s on-site septic manager for a four bedroom house, which could be e.xpanded to a five bedroom is needed. Staff is recommending approval of the variance to permit the oversized accessory buildin- to remain on the property based on the existing building location, the best building site on ihc'lot is lock’d behind the barn, and it allows for a walkout at the highest lot elevation. Mabusth noted the riding arena would also be subject to the principal structure setbacks. Bren indicated the paddock area would just be used for pasture. Bren stated at this time thev do not intend to use it for anvthing but pasture. I law n recommended the Planning Commission grant a variance for accessorv use to the land. Kahn inquired whether the original house has been removed. Weinberger stated the house was removed a couple of weeks ago. Newton indicated the addition to the bam would be used for storage, noting she has a canmer she would like to store inside. ~ ‘ Bren stated the principal residence would be constructed prior to the addition to the bam. There were no public comments regarding this application. Ilavvn moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #01-2734 505 Orchard Park Road, granting of a variance to permit the oversized accessorv buildina to remain on property without a principal structure, subject to the construction 'of the prikipal residence located behind the barn occurring prior to the addition to the barn, and grantino of a v permitting accessory use of land. VOTE: Ayes7,Navs0. ^ "»'n^ of a variance PAGE 10 ML\UTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o’clock p.m. (#7) #01-2735 PROPOSED ZONLNG CODE AMENDMENT, SECTION 10.03, SIFBD. 14, STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE ORDINANCE STANDARDS, 8:10 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. Gaffron stated this proposed zoning code amendment relates to in-ground pools and whether they should be included as lot coverage by structure. The City originally approved this ordinance approximately 10 years ago. with a decision later being made to include in-ground pools in lot coverage by structure calculations. GafTron noted this item was noticed as a public hearing. Hawn stated some members ot the Planning Commission would prefer that in-ground pools continue to be included in the lot coverage by structure calculation in an effort to reihu e massing on the property, noting that the Planning Commission is split on this issue. Lindquist noted on lots less than two acres some members of the P' . . ^ « ion felt that pools should be counted as structural coverage. Stoddard commented that decks are also considered hardcover. Si. ith suggested that Planning Commission also review the deck issue Rahn concurred that this issue should be addressed further. Hawn noted Mary King was in the audie.ice, and inquired what her structural coverage vvould be if the pool were included in the calculation. King indicated they are proposing 15 percent structural coverage with their new residence, and if the pool were included in that calculation, it would bring it up to 23 percent. Gaffron suggested the Planning Commission might want to consider some rev isions to the ordinance since there is not a cle.ar consensus. There were no further public comments regarding this application. Hawn iiiuved, .Mabusth seconded, to recommend approval of Application «OI-27.55, Proposed Amendment of Zoning Code, Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C). Lot Cov erage by Structures Slandaids, with the understanding that in-ground pools and decks should be considered hardcover and not structural coverage, and that the hardcover should be regulated on lots over 1,000 square feet back from the lakeshore and on properties less than two acres. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 3, Smith, I.ind(|uist and Fritzler Opposed. PAGE II MINUTES OF TIIE ORONO TLANNING COMMISSION MEE TINC; MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2001 6:30 o’clock p.m. (#8) #2J33 PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT, SECTION 10.20, SUBD. 4C, HOME OCC UPATION STANDARDS, 8:31 p.m. - 8:33 p.m. Hawn inquired whether there was anyone in the audience who wished to comment on this zonine code amendment. There were no public comments regarding tliis item Hawn stated it is tl»e desire of the Planning Commission to table this matter in order to discuss it joint work session with the City Council. Hawn moved, Mabusth seconded, to tabic Application #2333, Proposed Zoning Code Amendment, Section 10.20, Subd. 4C, to a joint work session with the Citv Council. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0 m a PL/VNNING COM.MISSION CO.M.MENTS (#11) PLANNING CO.M.MI.SSION Al’I’Rt)V..\L OF MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 15.2001 Lindquist moved, Prit/lcr seconded, to approve the minute.s of the October 15, 2001 Plannin Commission meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#12) SELECTION OF REPRE.SEM ATIVES FOR CITV COUNCIL iMFETINCS ON NOVEMBER 26, 2001 AND DECEMBER 10, 2001 November 26 - Hawn December 10 - Smith (#10) 01 HER I.SM E.S FOR DISCUSSION Hawn, on behalf of the Planning Commission and the City of Orono.anked Dale I indquist for his many years ol service on the Planning Commission. Hawn noted this is Lindcniist’s last meetini! \\ilh Uic Planning Commission. ^ (#9) REPORT OF PLANNING COMMUSSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDivr COUNCIL MEETINGS OCTOBER 22, 2001 AND NOVEMBER 13,2001 Stoddard st.ited he attended the October 22 Council meeting, with the Citv Council discussine the l-orest Lake Landing issue. The Council after some discussion voted to make this access a Cl-i« l which allows pedestrian access to the lake and small Ivvat launching. Stoddard noted the Conned ’ rc tricted swimming or fishing at this location. '-^uunui Gaffron sjated Iho City warned to avoid openins this lake access point up to somctltirte it had never been in the past, noting that the residents ,n this area tnav have been using an income? pafhvv^ irihe PAGE 12 NnNUTES OF TIIF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETLNG MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19,2001 6:30 o’clock p.m. (Report of Planning Commission Representatives, Continued) lake in the past. Gaffron stated the Council voted to limit access to the lake at tliis location to just pedestrian access. Stoddard .stated the Council did approve the application on Baldur Park subject to the Applicant connecting to City sewer. Gaffron stated the City has not yet received a sewer easement over the adjoining property. Weinberger stated the adjoining property owner is proposing to construct two houses on his land and would like to hook up to City sewer. Weinberger commented the Applicant is considering reducing his proposal to one house. Mabusth stated she attended the November 13, 2001 City Council meeting, noting that Western Steel did submit a revised plan for their property. Mabusth stated they are proposing to install an outdoor gas pump on their property w ith an overhead canopy. Mabusth stated the Council also approved the fence ordinance, with the Council suggesting the Planning Commission continue to look at fences located in street yards. Hawn recommended this item be discussed in a joint work session with the Council. Gaffron noted the Amoco Station would be changing to Conoco in the near future, w ith some signage and lighting issues needing to be addressed. ADJOURNMENT Lindquist moved, Frit/ler .seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 8:47 p.m. Tlicrc being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 8:47 p.m. Elizabeth Hawn, Chair PAGE 13