HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-14-1975 Planning MinutesPLANNING COtllSSICN A(32®A
Action Session - July 14, 1975
Time - 7:00 P.M.
•j
A. Action Items
1. Msrina Report - Gayles, North Star, North Shore Drive _
2. #27 Rddfield Homes, 2685 Pheasant M - Variance, lot area aftd width
3. #28 Roger Patch, 1330 6th Ave. N. - Subdivision
4. #29 Rotert Birlceland, 4500 North Shore Dr. - Variance, lot area
5. #30 Dennis Sullivan, 3133 Casco Circle - Rip Pap Peimit
6. #31 Cheyenne Land Go. 8 Richard Neslutid, 100 Orono Orchard Rd.
Rezoning
7. #32 Ralph Burnett, 2040 Shoreline Dr. Scott Property - Platting
8. #33 ?tiriel Senn, 4448 N. Shore Dr., - Variance, lakeshore setback
and hardcover.
#34 Good Shepard Lutheran Church, 3745 Shoreline Dr. - Cond.
Use Permit for Day Care Center.
10. #35 Ed Lehman, 3525 Shoreline Dr. - Sid)division, Variance and
Cond. Use Permit for fill.
11. COMPLETED ITB!S FOR COUNCIL
n Items
Herrick Circle - rezoning and FRD
Review Comprehensive Plan for amendment
2. Robert Eck^ • 505 Orchard Park Rd.
Vacation • deferred by Planning ComnissionVfor additional data
3. IHiblic Norks Relocation • Deferred for forther study.
leted Items
1. Evaluation of Proposed DNR
Shoreline .(kiidl ines •m>held
2. North Shore Marina - Lake elevation deteimination*upheld
‘"le
0.
. . ..-A
> -
>* •
V
w •^v/' - *
’!*v^ V ,
m
pi,»’K;iiA'a cm-'issim Acnm ssiErit® •■ July w, ms
|, Tne CiXiic Piannoj)^ Cc7JTO?v';sicn Rxt cn the above dale
with the follavdTig ;:«nihers present: Chaiiinan : Hake,
Pesek, McPojviid- Yar; KtM;t, Caj.-tis, Ih.Tilap ;-md Wooxey :
Absent: Guthrie ^ Kailestad Hgiuiali.
Lea'/e of absence: Gasch.
7:f!6 P.M,
Diauia Dunlap ?oved tc appixvie Uie minutes of Jusie SO,
1975. Paul resek seconded. Discussion. Correction of
minutes regarding ?<arina report, (oiiiy tor the purposw^
of detem.iniiig deck lenp^hs) CLUilap ap]:roved the mijiutcs
of June 30, 1975 as tDiended.
KiDjrES
Hank reported that Gayles >^.rina ’.vants t*rtO dianges: i f
Parking and storage designatiort and hoin*s of operation.
Also, G&yles has signed the txvised rosolution agreement
and the proposed site yjl::jis wiiich are v>srt of the resol*
ution and ]:aid the necessary fee for his iitoving license
for 1975.
r'« ••
V-."^'v
m\miA RHPoitr-
GAYL^, NORnr*
STAR, NOKIH SiCPvE
DRIVE.
!
'"I
There is to ba a special ^irark session meeting on North
Star ^'^lrina, July 15, 1975, at 2:00 F.M., which is to
bring out. facts of information concerning the question of;
use of the dock located cn Crystal Bay.
L J
■
l: '
Van Nest moved, Mcroiiaid seconded to reccr.i:iumd ayorrA’a! of
tiie variance because of the fb5io»v’ing existing coiditicns cind
hardships related to the propeity;
1. This is the last remaining undeveloped parcel of
this subdivision,
2. No other available adjolnirig lands.
3. This lot is contiguious to ctlier properties in the
iamsdiate area.
4. Parcel has been as.sessed for sewer and water.
5. No other variances would be required.
RfiDFim) h71’E3-
ARIANCE, LCT ARE^JS
AI'ID WIDTH
Ayes (7), Nayes (0).
The Planrdng Ccnaissloa schsdtiled a public hearing to
be held cn August 4, 1975 at 7:00 P.M.
Paul Pe.sek me ved tliat the Plannin^i Ca'.ipisslon appro-/e
the variance because of tbs condition and
hardship? - this substandard let resulting from tha
location of the existing dwelling asid the ccsifiguraticn
of tlie land was considered at the timo the plat was
approved in 1973, the area of the lot is within .05%
of th-3 80% ojtlinanco provisian, access on to Coirity
Road #19 lias been approved by tlie Ccunty, and no other
variences vfin be required.
ROGER PATtll-
ROBEiri* DiRKHLAND
y.VRl.^E, U/T ARPA
r
F
O
i>
.; / r .
e
b>- *
r ^
L
PLANNING ACTICN niGTlNG - July 14, i9/.S Page 7
Curtis made tlie jTotion thiat tlie Planiiinp Comnission rec-
OBinend approval cf Dennis Sulii\^*s praposal on the
condition that he rip rap with notliuig but rock.
Van Nest seconded.
Ayes (7), Mayes (0).
DKvINIS .mLIVAN -
RIP PAP PERMIT
The Planning Conniissioji stated that a variance from the
street setback requirement vculd also be necessary.
This is a substandard parce]. SJjpportjiig an adequate
structure.
MJRIEI. SENN-
VARIANCE, LAKESrORH
SETBACK f, IIARPOn'ER
Diane Dunlap made the motion to reccmiend denial of the
variance. Pesek seconded.
Ayes (7), Mayes (0). “
.» .
The Planning Commission pointed out several points to be
reviewed in considering this proposal, such as a cash
Park dedication fee in lieu of tlie pro7X)sed land dedi
cation, as the Park Board felt several existing ccnditioiis
RfiJLRI FJRMETr- soOTT pimnonf
PLATTING
mi^t restrict its use-(the wet and marsh coiiditUcis, access,
and t:traffic along County Rd. #15), feasability of extending
private road from properties to the nortli for providing
private road on this development, and the intended use of the
lakeshore strip of land across County Road #15, whether this
strip was to be included as a part cf the individual parcels
for accessary use of private docks or community docks. The
tot^l area of the 7 proposed parcels is 13.7 acres excluding
the buildable land on cutlot 8 and the lake^diore strip across
County Road #15. The develqx’r was also reminded to chedc
all seli>acks of existing buildings to asstire setback require
ments.
The Planning Ccronission scheduled a public hearLig on tlie
proposal for 7:15 on August 4, 1975.
Hank presented the proposal of Good Shepherd on the Conditional GOOD SHEPHERD UJTHERAM
Use to use the existing parsonage as a daytiiiie activity CONDITICl^IAi- U5E
center for the developmentally delayed.PEPMIT FOR DAYAcrrvnY center
Joyce Olson, representative for tlie day activity center
stated that Good Shepherd is licensed by the Stat<j 5 that
'they have to follow the State guide lines and th?.i; the
facilities do meet all the state requirements, *niis
cause is funded by the State, Federal end County. The
day activity center is a separate non-profit organixaticn
and is not affiliated with the church. The program would
be designed for preschool children, primarily from birth to
the age of 18 months.
^ ■
—*
‘I* • >
O
■y
«?1:,'m
SL-' ■: \:i
'■1K:'m555^
MS^IM
’•
f.'A
ry.»^N-TI'!G C;a.fi>Sgt(K iK.nm l-teEni^j.JuJLy 14, .197*‘5
m• 4 V
the PlannlJig Coi-trassion instructed the Zoning Adinin'
istr&tor to send notices of th ? public hea'ring to all
property owners within 200 feet of the property and ail
those to the junction of Dun^'ocdy Ave. and Casco Paint
R '
ic
Dunlap moved to call for a 7«blic hearing an Augi.st 4,
1975. Van Nest seconded.
Ayes (7), NavTs (0).
Banlc sifijinitted the background of t3ie rs&anij\g pragosal
fnan RR-IB (2 acres) to R-IA (1 Acre) by the iiieyeTfflie
Land Co. - (Richard Noslnnd).
After revicfwing the petition, the Plmning Consaission
pointed out to the represontative that the raticcrt^ls
listed were not all facts. Ihe interceptor referred
to has not as yet been iiu;tailed. Ail suircunding
properties in the Village of Orono are zoned 2 acius
and the Luce Line Trail provides an ade({uate boundar/
from the more densely zoned municipality to tho north.
They also Infc^z/aed the applicant tiiat a proposed plat
shcmd be i^icluded with the rezonlng r£<n.:»st. It
would also be necessary to determine sewer availabilities,
road routes, traffic patterns, bridges and underpasses,
wetlands, bike § hikeways, separability, access, and etc..
before s^eduling a piiblic hearing from idiich a
------ .dbnendation could be made to Council. Present zoning of
the area is jtsstified by our Conprehensive Plaji.
Van Nest moved, Dunlap seconded to table the proposal
for lade of in&zmation till tiie maetlng of August
4, 1975, or uitil such time that additionsl infoimticn
be stinnitted.
Ayes (7), Nayes (0).
The Planning Comnissicn requested tc* include in the records ED LEfflAN
that during the di.scussion the applicant was iristcjcted to
every effort to conhine lots 1,2, ^ 3 of Block one~Nr.varre VARIANCE AND GC^^)
as one buildirg site and to try to obtain lot 7-B.lxk one- USE PER^flT R)R PILL
Navarre to Incltide with any future pioposed division to
eliminate the single substandard lot.
Van Nest moved, IXznlap seconded to recomn«nd to Council
on approval of a single split of lot lU, Langdan Park to
provide a site for the dwelling already purchased, Ihe
south lot line of this r*ew parcel would be a c-vntiiTuation
of the south lot line of lot 3, Navaxre running easterly
across lot 10, langdon Pai*k.
Ayes (6), Nayes (0), - Abstain-(1)-McDonald W:11
.■» > ■
r-
if
> .»
ii
I
1/' ♦ 'y.
i*'.-■ '-I; - ••
tr .'•*.■ • -
y .
i^- • > ■-•
; . -V • ,t-
. b '
?r ■ • T, •■'
,r^ ;:' •■ -
....' - *WE Pi*imct (WCtsS'C:*! Acnm ifmrnHG, jji.y 14, 197:
mmm Mm
- ;. *• • •* ‘IVvV ***• • **'••• * -
■II
Pcf^ 4
Van Nest mved, ^'hcley sec:of:ided to lecamerM a|jpr'jr,r.l of a
grading or le\'oling si^jcct tu a ii-ciw topog md srarv^jy
indicating bitJdable ai*ea., t;xi3t?ng anf projr^sef
calculations oft 'v’oluiie of liil necerca;:/* 'Hte x'i::caKmnc%d
apfiroval would also be imbjeci; to cbo villr.ge Bngineor'S
ap^KPvai. _
Ayes (7), Na/es (0), ^
m
C7
mwmm n
m Vm Nest i^foved to mcxm^id that g:<f.ntiijg cf a ivt siz^
vaxi.ance for the ne,v p-ircei, VfcoIe>' s^ccnd^id..
Ayes (7), Na/es (0).■•-v'
,.rv:>0 The Pianiiijig (’cnsnissim discussed fiiruaox :<.r.s»a5 bixa/ght
up by Hank NSjhich,
-:v;:
:V
Van Nest aovsci to adjoutnnient. V^ley stxmAi^i.
Ayes (7), NayerS (0)/
AnJOUroWENT AT 11:00 P.M.■'3
. ;•'■■ '■••" .' : . - ■ ' ■*’,,,;
'■ ■■■;■■ •'■"■' ■ :'
a;.'.wV
■‘■ ' '■ ■ ;. ' '■ ' ■■■■'■ ■ ;
':. ■' ■.
;./.,=riM ■
. . .AAV:
•V ■ .■:/•■■’:A V-
V- '::vv '■ -..■■ A ' -. '■*
fey'l:;'A » . ' ■
mmm
m
•mmrn.
•i'-.. 5. ’
■ ■••..i
• t-.rt'^
’<v*
mM
Or:
?• ’ V
.''JT'
■.rbr-- ^ >
WM-:
•V-.’ . • .■•■<*■li;
iV. -.• ;jI
: j
?-■•'■'■'"i
:' *' ^
- i; •: • ' • • ■
■fvci'
•'r.;:
• rV
Iv a'.*
r’-
. • /^v‘v ::>•;/••"-?
. ,■.. 3-
r-'b-"'- -■ ^-■■'>■-. ■
••'i:n
'V --.
^:v
1
,,'■. ,1 •i-L-: V •;
V.'•>j
tu
rn
mm •••‘'■‘r- • . ■
"■ ' T
■*^1
^■■■.- r.J
'T
••:
' t •• •• ;•,. :‘ ..*
M
/VT:5;:::C-A'ry":-r,■:•• .•>
:•• V : ■■ !
•i • * . ''fc-
■•- A. \•tmm.:. ~-.'V ; ■
k-
•■■/■■. ■ ■ ■
Kistt