HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-16-1973 Planning Minuteso
VILLAGE OF ORONO
Regular iieeting of
July 16, 1973
the Planning Commission,
The Planning Commission met on the above
date with the following members present:
Acting Chairman Van Nest, Guthrie, Hays,
Kullberg, Ryerse, and Searles. Absent:
Chairman Poisson, Elliott, Gasch, Kokesh,
and Paurus.
Mr, Gardner requested a variance from the 50*
front yard setback for the construction of
a garage. Because access to the Gardner lot
is by a private easement, there is no .well-
defined front or rear to the property.
Another problem is that this area was platted
and developed before the land was zoned two
acres, and as a result, the two acre require
ments are not really applicable. Mr. Gardner
was asked whether he could move ]iis garage
further to the north, but he felt that if he
did, he would not nave enough area between the
iiouse and the garage for turning.
Searles moved, Guthrie seconded, that the
approval of the side yard and front yard set
back variance be granted as long as a written
statement from the owner of RLS 934 is
presented to the Council indicating tliat they
have no objections. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0).
Elliott entered Council Chambers at 8:00 P.M.
7:30
VARIANCE
1486 Long Lake Boulevard
Mr. Nicholas Palaia presented the Casco Point
Corp. proposal for four townhouses on a narrow
peninsula at the end of Ivy Place. A restrictive
conenant concerning this piece of property
prohibits any d»»veiopment on the original
peninsula, the townhouses were designed considering
tJic fact that units must be limited to that portion
of the peninsula that had been created by fill,
that the sanitary sewer line had a 20* easement
and that tliere was a SO* setback from the lake.
Searles directed the Zoning Administrator to
consult with the Village Attorney on the question
of accumulating building credits on land that
has a restrictive covenant that prohibits
development. There was some concern about the
access to the property, but At. Cox claimed that
he had a 25* easement over the neighboring
property to the south to connect with Ivy Place.
CASCO POINT CORP.
End of Ivy Place
Searles moved, Guthrie seconded, tnat the
Planning Commission recommend to the Council
that it hold a public hearing as the PRO
ordinance allows. Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0),
€)
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD JULY 16, 1975
The Wayzata Country Club is requesting approval
of a PRD concept that requires a rezoning from
tvo acre lots to half-acre lots and a
variance of three units per acre. The petitioner
plans to construct 20 townhouses on 8.6 acres,
17 of these units and 7.4 of these acres are
in Orono. 3.5 acres of the 7.4 acres in Orono
are marsh. The land involved in this request
is Lot 8, Allo-Rae Terrace and a portion of
Parcel 3040, which has been golf course property.
Mr. John Goodacre of the Wayzata Country Club
explained that the units would be constructed
for club members and ownership would be
limited to club members only.
The Zoning Administrate? suggested to the
commission members that it would be within
their power to call for a public hearing
regarding the rezoning request.
Elliott moved. Hays seconded, that a public
nearing be called for the August 20, 1973
Planning Commission meeting regarding the
request to rezone to half-acre lots. Motion,
Ayes (7) - Nays (0).
Mr. Johnston submitted a new proposal for
Lots 1-6 and 24-29, Block 8, Saga Hill Revised.
The new proposal indicated three instead of
four lots. A preliminary plat of the property
'hows that each lot would oe 38,000 sq. ft.
With Mr. Johnston's new proposal, access to the
lot would be provided with two driveways--one
entering Loma Linda and one entering County
Road #151 on the turn. The grade of the drive
ways could be reduced to a safe level according
to Mr. Johnston by constructing the homes with
a split entry.
Kullberg moved. Searles seconded, tlut the
request be denied until the Village receives
Hennepin County's comments concerning Mr.
Joanston's most recent proposal, and until
accurate lot sizes are provided. Motion,
Ayes (1) - Nays (6). Kullberg Aye.
Searles moved. Hays seconded, that the Village
Zoning Administrator and Engineer present a
recommendation regarding the best location of
a driveway, (main concern being traffic safety)
or driveways, and present this to the next
Council meeting. The final plans should also
include accurate acreago calculations for each
lot. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). Kullberg Nay.
Page 2
PRD
Wayzata Country Club
DIVISION n VARIANCE
Loma Linda and North Arm
DIVISION 6 VARIANCE
Loma Linda 8 North Arm Dr.
SSI
MINUTES OP A REGULAR MEETING HELD JULY 16. 1973 Page 3
Mr, Gobel is requesting that the Village grant
a variance from the setback* requirements from
both the road right>of-wa/ and the side yard
for the construction of a garage. Because
there is a tree between the house and proposed
garage and the lot is only 57* wide, it was
determined that a variance from the zoning
requirements was justified.
VARIANCE
1400 Cherry Place
Van Nest moved. Hays seconded, that a variance
be approved to allow a 20' setback from road
right-of-way and 6' setback from the side
property line. Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0).
;
Mr. Duncan's request for a variance from the
ISO' setback requirement for a stable was
tabled until the August meeting so the
commissioners could inspect tJie property
personally.
VARIANCE
4760 West Branch Road
Mrs. Plant's original request for a variance
of 14' from the 35' setback requirement from
the road was modified. Mrs. Plant's second
proposal would require a variance of 7.S'.
Mrs. Plant needs the north light for her
portrait painting and she claims that she
cannot construct this addition without a
variance.
VARIANCE
224S Watertown Road 1
Searles moved. Kullberg seconded, that a
variance of 7,5' be approved. Motion.
Ayes (7) - Nays (0).
Guthrie moved. Elliott seconded, that the
Doleman request for a variance be tabled
until the petitioner appears before the
Planning Commission to explain why the variance
of 3' and the additional garage space is needed.
Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0).
VARIANCE
1680 Shadywood Road
Kullberg moved that the meeting be adjourned.
Motion died for lack of a second.
Kullberg left Council Chambers at 10:00 P.M.n
Mrs. iiutler reviewed the findings of the
Navarre Task Force with the Planning Commission.
The Planning Commission had the following
conuiients regarding the report:
NAVARRE TASK FORCE REPORT
f 1
1. The Barton-Aschman figure indicating that
651 of the traffic entering the CSAH 115 8 #19
intersection would be coming from the north
should not be stricken from the text.
(Continued)
MINUTES OP A REGULAR MEETING HELD JULY 16, 1973
2. Any applicant who wants to got lOOt density
credit should be required to apply under the
PRD ordinance. Planning Coanission aenbers
agreed that a ainiaua of two units should be
clustered together in one building but no
conclusions were reached regarding the aaxiaua
number of units to be allowed in a building.
3. It was the feeling of those present that
the staff should be responsible for supplying
aore detailed information concerning the
effects this proposal would have on assessments
in the Navarre area.
Page 4
NARARRE TASK PORCE REPORT
(Continued)
Mr. Loucks asked that the Planning CcAmission
give him some feedback regarding the type of
shopping facilities that should be provi
the nc
pe oi
provided
It was thein the north part of the Village, it was
opinion of the aeabers present that smaller
neighborhood centers would be preferable to
one large subregional center.
Other comments were that marshes should be
shown as a conservancy area and tne land north
of the property designated as multiple family
between Nillow Drive and Old Crystal Bay
Road should be changed to a higher density.
Guthrie moved. Hays seconded, that the
meeting be adjourned at 11:15 P.M. Notion,
Ayes (6) - Nays (0).
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Tom Loucks
ADJOURNMENT
Respectfully submitted.
Dexter J. Marston
Zoning Administrator
e