My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-17-1973 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1973
>
09-17-1973 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 2:06:13 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 2:06:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c <br />VILLAGE OF ORONO <br />Regular Meeting of the Planning Coomission, <br />Septeaber 17, 1973 <br />7:30 PJf. <br />The Planning Conaitsion aet on the above date <br />with the following aeabers present: Chairaan <br />Paurus, Guthrie, and Searles. Absent: Elliott, <br />Gasch, Hays, Kokesh, Kullberg, Poisson, Ryerse, <br />and Van Nest. <br />Since a quorua was not present, discussion <br />was held on the value of holding a aeeting. <br />Members present agreed that they should go <br />through the iteas before thea and hear the <br />people present. <br />Unofficial recommendation to allow the division <br />contingent on the vacation of the old cartway <br />of questionable existence and a resolution oe <br />drawn prohibiting construction on the newly <br />created lot. <br />Members concurred that: <br />1. No public purpose was being served by <br />placing a road through the swamp. <br />2. That a road could be built without going <br />through the swamp. <br />3. Density was not defined. The zoning is <br />R>1A and adjacent Allo*Rae Terrace has lots of <br />approximately 2S,000 sq. ft. Members felt <br />it would not be unreasonable to allow eight <br />units under these circuastances. <br />Mr. Abel, representing the Club, stated it <br />would not be feasible to have less than 20 <br />units. <br />Members concurred that this was a good <br />division and should be allowed. <br />Members agreed this was only a convenience <br />division and could in no way be a division <br />for development so should be permitted. <br />Members concurred that the division met the <br />code and should be allowed. <br />DIVISION <br />4350 Bayside Road <br />PRD - Nayzata Country <br />Club <br />DIVISION <br />4345 "rt*>./n floud <br />DIVISION <br />Tamarack Drive <br />DIVISION <br />Old Crystal Bay Road 9 <br />Sixth Avenue North
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.