Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-26-1979 Planning Packet
( AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday« November 26, 1979 Council Chambers - 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER 1. Call to Order/Roll PUBLIC HEARINGS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETINGS 2.7:30 P.M. - Public Information Meeting First National Bank of Navarre, 2465 Shadywood Road - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIOI 3.7:45 P.M. - Public Hearing - Richard J. Haefele, Erwin Martin, Richard Hassel - VACATION OF A SECTION OF NAVARRE LANE. 4. 8:00 P.M. - Public Information Meeting Robert Niichel, 3135 Jamesto%m Road •> PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISICBi ACTION ITEMS 5. #474 Kathleen Gluek, 2440 North Shore Drive - FINAL SUBDIVISION 6. 1531 Robert A. VanTassel, 1170 Loma Linda - VARIANCE SKETCH PLAN REVIEW 7. «S29 Kteve Wallack (TMG Dev.), 4100 Sixth Ave. North 8. #532 George R. Steiner, 700 County Road Six APPROVAL OP MINUTES 9. Meeting of October 29, 1979 INPORMATKm ITEMS 10. Fence Ordinance - Public Hearing Planning Commission Meeting - December 10, 1979; 7:30 P.M. 11. Accessory_Structure Ordinance - Public Hearing Planning Commission Meeting - December 10, 1979; 7:45 P.M. 12. Comprehensive Plan'Review ~ City of Independence : r aTUtMA.Bl Com /9-n t VHLLMJE OF OMNO 9^ ».Mi • •»• PHilMI f IHI.it «^»*** ••.•9t* y f TO: FROM: DATE Council and Planning Conmission Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator November 19, 1979 SUBJECT: #526 First National Bank of Navarre, 2465 Shadywood Road PRELIMINARY REVIEW I Zoning District - B>4 and LR**1B Two Lot Plat - B*>4 Lot Area Required - 20,000 s.f. Proposed - 50,000 s.f. LR-IB Lot Area Required - 1 acre Proposed - 4 acres The Planning Commission has had little discussion concerning this sub division application. In the process cf reviewing the bank's commercial site plan, the Council has specified conditions that must be fulfilled in the platting. The following are Council's conditions: 1. Wetlands - The wetlands shall include the area below the ^4d' contour line, approximately 1% acres. The City will require a Flowage and Conservation Easement. 2. Access - Access to the residential lot will be a 60' width and located at the southeast corner on Kelly Avenue. This entrance and access drive will be excluded from the wetlands. Planning Commission should be aware that the City's wetlands map has designated the 938' contour as the %retland area. 3. Landscape easement (see enclosure) will be required over a 10' corridor designated on your plan. The bank is unable to maintain the required 10' buffer zone abutting the residential lot. The parking area will be located 3' from the lot line requiring a 7' variance. The 10' buffer area will be planted and maintained by the bank. Park fee Commercial lot - area) Residential lot $670.00 ($500.00 per acre of gross land - 200.00 Total $870.00 5. Certification of area in each lot, to include the wetlands area in residential lot. Please review your plans handed out at the Planning Commission meeting of October 29, 1979. If you were absent, please call the office. #526 TO:Planning Commission and Council FROM:Jsanne A. Habusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: SUBJECT: October 23, 1979 1526 First National Bank of Navarre, 2465 Shadywood Road SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW In the process of reviewing the First National Bank of Navarre's commercial site plan, the Covuicil has required a plat dividing the zoning districts. All commercial activity must be contained within the B-4 zone. The B-4 property's (Lot 2) area is a little over an acre and the LR-IB lot (Lot 1) is just over four acres. The residential lot has a designated wetlands of about one acre along the Kelly Avenue side. There is just one access point available along Kelly Avenue touching southern property line. The entire parcel is sewered. A Flowage and Conservation Easement will be required. A Public Information Mf-eting shall be scheduled for November 26, 1979. M . . V 'i y >• I DECLARATION OF EASEMENT This Declaration* made this day of 1979, by DAVID J. DELANEY and DELANEY, his wife, as the owners in fee of the tract of land hereinafter described lying in Hennepin County, Minnesota, namely: Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 1422, according to the plct thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, 1 and WHEREAS, it is the present plan of the Declarants to build a commercial building to be used by First National Bank of Navarre, to gether with various appurtenances in connection therewith on that part of said Tract E which is presently zoned commercial under the ordinance of the City of Orono, hereinafter called the "bank site", and WHEREAS, the Declarants will be constructing a berm and landsnaoina an area immediately adjacent to the Southwest side - Xfr ■ \r day of . X979. ^NEY, his wife, as the Eter described lying >. 1422, file and listrar »ty. f the Declarants to build a tional Bank of Navarre, to- ction therewith on that part ommercial under the ordinanci he "bank site", and instructing a bersi and i the Southwest side 'H 5jj ^ f Line A is described as the line extending from the Northwesterly line to the Southeasterly line of Tract E lying Southwesterly of and parallel to County Road No. 19, 250 feet at right angles from the Southwesterly right of way of Hennepin County Road No. 19. Line B is described as the line extending from the Northwesterly line to the Southeasterly line of Tract E lying Northeasterly of and parallel to County Road No. 19, 260 feet at right angles from the Southwesterly right of way of Hennepin County Road No. 19. Line C is described at. follows: Beginning at the « easterly corner of said Tract E; thence North wester ly . along the Northeasterly line of said Tract E 202.5 feet, more or less, to a corner of said Tract E, said point being the point of beginning of said Line C; thence South 56*29*29" West to its conclusion at a point 260 feet from the Southwesterly right of way line of County Highway No. 19, measured at right angles to said right of way line. That this easement is appurtenant to and runs with the bank site which is described as all of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 1422, lying Northeasterly of a line drawn Southwesterly pf and parallel to County Road No. 19, 250 feet at right angles from the Southwesterly line of Hennepin County Highway No. 19. This easement shall run with and bind the land and be for the benefit of the bank site above described, and enforceable by the owner or owners of the bank site, their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns until thirty (30) years from the date hereof. Enforcement of this easement shall be by proceedings at law or equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate the rights granted under this easement, either to restrain such violations or recover damages therefor, and failure by the owner or owners of the bank site to enforce or seek to enforce the rights granted hereunder shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so for any subsequent violation. . . David J. Delaney Delaney -2- i cxtcndimj from the teasterly line of and parallel to ; right angles from of Hennepin County I extending from the easterly line of and parallel to right angles from of Hennepin County Beginning at the ; thence North- y line of said s, to a corner of the point of e South 56*29*29” nt 260 feet from line of County ht angles to said nt to and runs with the ract E» Registered Land h line dratm Southwesterly SO feet at right angles bounty Highway No. 19. 1 bind the land and be escribed« and enforceable their respective legal isigns until thirty (30) of this easement shall be iny person or persons Lghts granted under this Ions or recover damages lers of the bank site to inted hereunder shall in to do so for any subsequent J. Delaney Delaney STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss C(:MNTY OF HENNEPIN ) this and The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me day of _ _ _ _ _ _» 1979, by DAVID J. DELANEY DELANEY, his wife. Notary Public STATE DEE TAX DUE HEREON $2.20 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: J. Robert Hibbs DORSEY, WINDHORST, HANNAPORD, WHITNEY 6 HALLADAY 2300 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 iii ' 4 t'*’ '■ ■ ! PF HC 1233 ■■ftPPWTY OWNERS LIST OCPARTMCMT or riHAMCt A-tOS OOVCRNMCNT CCNTCR MINNCArOLIS^ MO 88407 mst »itc I CfUTIFt THAT TMf ”*llV?ilUl“ MpHt‘CCRTinCAtC ARC AR ACCURATf ARO TRUl RtR"« SINTAtlMI Of jL* iJSJi ilWRTtOATC OR TRf RtCOROt Of TRi MRR"«WR WW ftRARCI DIVItlOR. TO TRt OftT Of Rt ARORlJIM ARO Stuff. '' MtNHtfHi 00. flRARCf OlVlOlOR _________OATcifiil23- • FEE OWNER TAX PAYER / MAM.ING ADDRESS mI PROPERTY ADDRESS ID I -M twledgcd before me by DAVID J. DELANEY T> YELL.Y^*35hAf klei-^Y -p»^LANey ‘K 'bOA. (sO Public ^pjCTT- i ^l=SEAELM Ai lA—^ , ^ ?>» riiMTveitsiiY^ ATIBENtTL ^0 » zrt syriMO TAE.IC-_SttApyu^gOD 1?^ [«LADAY — f ■ SfrVA* lilSK? TO TMt ittt or Mt «ooot^ kNCI OWIWOO 0^ ‘ ‘ OY. PROPERTY ADDRESS ID 1 fcai*------------------------- Ut> yfPiL<-Y 1^003 U.< SrtADNVV^^’^ ----^{goz% ^/) A \gt>zA XfO---------- 7*> SrtADVM/OPD 'RD \go z7j i.HC 1233 DCPARTMCIIT of . FtNANCC A-OOS OOVCONMCNT CCNTCK MINNCAFOLISb MN 09407 PROPERTY OWNERS L^T Litr till FEE OOfNER S00‘ I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTE «*^"***'"f® AND REUEF. HENNEFIN CO. FINANCE OIYIEION ^ ./ DATE. TAX PAYER/ MAE.iNG ADDRESS |Y^Y/^4gut. sei^vi^g CGN"C^ ■iry -b. KGLu T^ANk. A/AVAgXC CO. XD s * ^ __________g~ V.O. A 7 ^ a IS ^ N<A\/A^g£: fftgifto /NC PMfeLUAfU BO/l fcO /S/AV'AV-'E.w. VO hJ^LtS'S^________V. _ - 10: J^TV-GZSOf* AVIs s tA9PU.l W.S s~S34S 4800 CASA/vuTfT 12.T> PROPERTY ADDRESS ID ’|?4t4«r &^\AX>V WOOI>lOOi 7^4S< SHAPTH/OQT^ 3g3> go If goz* OOZ\ 7/\S< Sl»Al^yU/0OD 'gl> 2,-bV^ SHQggUNg AICNT ycyT. HAul ^ESCAeCH A 330/U po_____ >f-=^kwev^i oM-' -Z3 A/l A /V ^pcuw/riEg. ‘Bio tescAEaf Z^oo SHAOyWOOP EO ^ Ai/A-ggfS______SS31Z -ZL. TEoTEEiyL TO: FROM: DATE: Flanning Commission and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth^ Zoning Administrator November 19, 1979 SUBJECT: *528 Haefele, Martin, Hassel, STREET VACATION - A PORTION OF NAVARRE LANE The abutting property ovmers, Richard J. Haefele representing the Church, Richard Hassel and Erwin Martin have petitioned to vacate a portion of Navarre Lane, from the intersection of Navarre Lane at County Road 19 to the intersection of Navarre Lane at Olive Avenue (see enclosed plat map). The County has closed the Navarre Lane access off at County Road 19 because of its nearness to the traffic signal at County Road 15 and 19 and of the dangers arising from left turns being made by cars going south on County Road 19. The County has stated that the Navarre Lane access will never be opened or that an additional curb cut wil'. not be approved in the right of way if City approves vacation. I have enclosed a utility map demonstrating, I hope, the futility of attempting to grant a separate easement for each utility (10’ for each). If the entire vacation is approved, I would recoimnend a blanket utility easement over the entire 66'. This type of restriction would set severe limitations also on the property ovmers. It is important that we receive some input from the Church as to future use proposed. A corner of the Church building is located within the Navarre Lane right of way. It may be possible to vacate that portion as opposed to getting involved in the complex network of utility easements. I I 1^^ I I 5920 HARDSCRABBLE ORCLE MOUND lMN 65364 (612) .472-5768 of .iir> •*.' for V. ••.or! .! In I'llcy*; ' I'lor., IjOt S, ’'locV Tn’-Tirjt.(* rf Lnnr-'<'n J'wrV 23 90 SHMtHfoop M »: V." flvr^ ^ of : urvfy: ** h*:r •!; r« rti *'y 1>fi* ir -I • ••! cor- r*'* r* '** {r n a cun '? ’ the •r »iotn ?• , ri, r?, .il^yV •*•••.rro A.%!'- t*^r, * *1 •'not.r: •in : tV;-1 t r^ 01 ", "nvnrlt*? oT 'yr.-vn •*• ^ sj tVl'nv'*: nt. ^o^tcfrnor rf r.nlJ ’jOt ; lh« nrc *iort^vo: ♦.r rly •ilenr the Vrrt*'»Tl * l^n*- r V>t !• to tto :.rr^ 1 I'n* the pi V.llr ^l»'V.*v r»*r- nln* .‘irrorr. rr.i1 l^nl * —; •ic •‘Irni’*'i/tV« -••r’: • Iain Flrar (rr • -.ir ty * • thefif?#* orIv eVn ?.orihcn5tf*rl;.* l:n*‘ r^ •• tr.o res^nrl'* l*r rf ?[crlhrrl*' •»lo» *r» IT • i'* ^ t.r • • • t ( r t' • f r ^ ; i r.rv 11 »» •• f . L* n*l ' ^ •• Id nr ^% * ir* . rrl'': I** r* r-lfi—1it- ^ron •'.-'-V'T i.T «••'f. »w,*r . •■ MWWt <(«J, t.1 «i *• OLtt'M t.H*»** :>.r/ Richabd J. Haefele ATTonnnr at law IQl naHWAT lit SAAT p. a BOX ax CTAMA. MDrifXMTA sxaia •It 44X-atOO OCT S6 ni9 ®»ty of. .orono October 25, 1979 Mr. Alan Olson City Planner City of Orono Crysta* Bay, Minnesota #528 55323 Re: Vacation Proceeding Dear Mr. Olson: Enclosed please find a check made payable to the citv of Orono as per our telephone conversation for the application to vacate part of old County Road 15 in the Navarre area. I have discussed the situation with Erwin Martin and Richard Hassel, representing the other adjoining landowners and they join in the application to vacate those portions which adjoin their property, (survey enclosed) Also enclosed is a copy of the letter from the Hennepin County Torrens Examiner's office with a proposed legal des cription for the proceeding. It is my understanding that no dedication was ever made and thus only the easement «K>uld be Involved. If a formal application is necessary - please advise. truly. Rich . Haefele RJH/dab CITY OF ORONO NOTICE #5 The Planning Commission will hold a Public Hearing in Chambers, at 1275 South Brown Road, on Monday, November 26, 1979, at 7:45 P.M. on the matter of Richard J. Haefele, Erwin Martin, and Richard Hassel's application for vacating a portion of Navarre Lane described as follows: Those parts of Lot 5, Block 3, Tovnalce of Langdon Park, and of Governaent Lot 6, Section 17, Township 117, Range 23, described as follows: Beginning at the Bost Easterly corner of Lot 21, WILEY'S NAVARRE ADDITION, LAKE MINNETONKA; thence Southwesterly to the BOSt Southerly corner of Lot 22 in said WILEY'S NAVARRE ADDITION; thence Northwesterly along the line between said WILEY'S NAVARRE ADDITION and Lot S, Block 3, Tovnsite of Langdon Park to the Northeasterly line of the right-of-way of County Road 19 in said -Lot 5; thence Southeasterly along the Northeasterly line of said right-of-way and its extension to the Westerly line of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1433, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin; thence Northerly along the Westerly line of said Tract A to the BOst Northerly corner of said Tract A; thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of the plat of LAFAYETTE RIDGE to its intersection with the Southeasterly extension of the Northeasterly line of Lot 21 in said WILEY'S NAVARRE ADDITION; thence Northwesterly to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that part of said Lot 5 described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of said Lot Five (5); thence Northwesterly along the Northerly line of said Lot Five (5), to a point One Hundred Fifty-two and 38/100 (152.38) feet Easterly froB the point of intersection of said North line with the Northeamerly line of the public highway running across said Lot Five (5), and known as Minnetonka Lake Park and Maple Plain Road; thence Southwesterly One Hundred Fourteen (114) feet to a point in the Northeasterly line of said road, distant Ninety-five and 6/10 (95.6) feet Southeasterly froB the aforesaid point of intersection of said Northeasterly line with the Northerly line of said Lot Five (5); thence Southeasterly along the Northeasterly line of said road to the Easterly line of Lot Five (5); thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said Lot Five (S) to point of beginning. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available for review xn the City offices. City of Orono Planning Commission e^^lM A. Mabusth, Zoning JAdministrator TO:Planning Commission and Council FROM: Jeanne A. Habusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:November 19, 1979 SUBJECT: #530 Robert Niichel, 3135 Jamestovm Road - METES AND BOUND SUBDIVISION The applicant proposes a metes and bounds division of his property. Lot 3, Block 1, Liberty Acres, into two parcels. Parcel A, non bulldable, is .32 acre and is to be combined with Lot 4, Block 1, Liberty Acres. The subdivision will still allow Parcel B a total of 5 plus acres with the necessary minimum 2 acres dry buildable. Lot 4, Block 1 is one of those marginal 2 acre dry buildable lots (remember Tanglewood off County Road 6) with additional limitations such as poor soils, nearness of best building site to wetlands and slope problems. The combination will give Lot 4 the best conditions for a standard system and the necessary expansion room for a future drainfield site. Please review the septic inspector's memo. #530 TO; FROM: DATE: Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Septic System Inspector November 16, 1979 SUBJECT: #530 Robert Niichel, 3135 Jamestown Road - SUBDIVISION Mr. Niichel is proposing a lot line rearrangement to accomodate a septic system on Lot 4, The site evaluator's report indicates that due to adjacent wetlands and soil conditions on the site, as well as the topography of the lot, the proposed drainfield would have to cross a lot line. Since the intent of our code is to ensure workable present and future systems on the same lot as the house they serve, a lot line rearrangment is in order. My inspection of the site verified that the proposed drainfield location is the most logical and will provide area for future use. I would recommend approval of the rearrangement assuming the required contiguous 2-acres of dry, buildable land are provided. / M !2 k k* S N N J •I #530 N# II I ID I \ TO:Council and Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: SUBJECT: November 20, 1979 #474 Kathleen Gluek, 2440 North Shore Drive FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL Mrs. Gluek has complied with all of the requirements allowing final approval of her 2<-lot plat. The drainfield for the existing house has been repaired and approved by the septic inspector. Staff recommends approval subject to the enclosed final resolution. Drive ints allowing final he existing house sector. Staff . resolution. resolution no. _ _ WHEREAS, the City o* Otono IS a organized and existing under the laws or rn ***** - .,1 A. .h. citv of Orono has adoptedWBBEAS, the City ecSnt^ic and safe development subdivision regulations for the oraer y, of land within the City; and ... .ohdS'p^rt s^KaSrei^fu^r-t^^^^^^^ of the pla?uSf?;gSltI»rof'’t£eTltr?ic“diM = pedlcatlon on the plat of drainage and utility easements. ^«rts"»d‘?SaS! as SLno!“ll^'*"“ creation of a new private driveway road shown on the plat as Outlot B. Dedication to the City °* 5^J®“J®i“ttati“s on the Shown on the plat. payment to the City of a Parh Dedication Pee in the amount of $100.00. payment to the City of Legal and Engineering fees in the amount of $50.00. HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT “??^'^?;t*'^‘wathleen^s*^Ptench a“SinSipr?oul;ryMrs:ra? ^ShlSirtftrfoUowing condition., The aforesaid plat “hall^ *il^ ‘5| r«r?!lUd°o““n:? SSp$*or?hi."Resolution and executed copies of Exhibit A as noted above. outlot A shall not be considered as a buildable lot. The approval granted by this “enJ! il*wiu“ a";^: ;rP?i«t«*ti the City of Orono for subdivision review. LV*^.'4 Dated this day of attest.: Walter R. Benson, Clerk/Administrator li’ '■ L l\AI nLctlN D rnciNv^n {>0^ 0 #^7V: LC IN FEET GORDON R. COFFIN CO. INC. ENGINEERS a LRNO SURVEtORS LONG LAKE . MINNESOTA 4 t • t ♦ 5 * •••<•• 0 #«• I *.* • .*1 it ».5 ‘ v<i i^D itiOl'iiC ••’••iaM 10?t • '•* i «^*, • •••• COFFIN CO. INC. LAND SO«V6YO«S MINNESOTA »»»• J* * r ^ V .• •• .N> • •* . 4 ' •. /• _ * ili.L T .•'''• ................. «. •• #•. » '*♦• ■• •i4'* *• *. « # #• • .*• .* ♦ LAND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION EXHIBIT 1 CITY OF ORONO r.O. Crr>»Al lAy. Hlwwof 5SS2S 479-1957 #531 »!«••• firtt r««4 tfm IfifprMtleii flippc. CempUf Ut^ I - II I - “* ITWpp 9T friiit). If •«•<•<§ •**•*•* \9tl9t or eclMir Infor^Btloii to Wtt«r JpocriW foot rtquNPt. InecNi^ltl# •ppllcNtlonp vill •••f •ce«ptP«. PROPERTY ADDRESS 1170 Lotna Linda UgAl 4«*ertgtlo» aK aII W aImma on AttAcMA SurAAg. C>MklC 9 APPLICANT iuma Robert A. VanTassel niANA 938-4439 M.m..f amaaaa 4738 East Coventry Road If AggllCANC tA Mt tMWAf, AAplAlB JH OWNER R.M Same nioiip Same Mtlllng AMtaaa Same Date Property Acquired ---------------------— •------. - « I (do) (doi^ also own other adjacent parcels of land fbOP€ — AGENT ------------------------------------------------ Cltenth/t«*») rif« MiiUMS AMrctt NOTICES ilioul4 %o 9OO0 Cp :ApplicPiit OMipr Atmt PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT list of EXHIBIT # Dpicrtptlow IwtttPi Appllcptioii It ifieltsd#: Applicptioii Ton w frepcrtj OunprD Li y CcrtlflcPtP ot SuT ^ Too Rpccipt # D«l« ApcctvpA • — StAff IpifoniAttea IT riAt HAg 7 7444 7. PRESENT USE *AAt<Antu»------ <othA»> Ootmmt Um4 tecvpUA BullAiBiCa) DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $_ __ AAtAkllAk mm MAA _ AAMCIMM »r AMgA*a AMtAClAg NAA _ kulM MW JL *aa »iJaI . rwglAA* ^ We presently have a variance to add a screened-in porch t Describe request in detail. —------------------------------------------------------------------------- the existing hard cover in the front of the cottage. We request additional side variance,! Add a m foot wooden deck from the Worth end of the porch toward the lot line. The 10 foot deck will infrin*’** on the 10 foot side setback by four feet. VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED t# ao EAgMAtAa saA: tAtteA <____»*«*« - U.A A aaa - l-» WtaA iMf) OtliAr 10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS ^ "**• Describe UNDUE HA^HIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY »AA«ietot frw- AtrtA« AwfM«AMw« «f amIp JL& • - - ■■ 12. Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK •> wAttliborUg grAMrttAA mm4mmthm MlgMwtlM>o« U t-iAAAl: The side deck will not infringe bn the 75 foot lake front but will rather be in the same plane urine cottage and will allwan arua fur scaUhg and outdbor “ grilling._ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ The APPLICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER must sign and date this AA«wlrA« AA AAMA*t«a Vf tlw IawIm AMlMtAtrAtor. AgrWAA ew PA? All #AAA AM/aA MNMWAI APpAAAAA IPCWrAAg 1« AAVtAW .f thlA APpllAAtlAW, A m4 CAAtlflAA EhAt tM tnlelMClASI A«ppH*a lA ttWA APg AATTAOk tm EhA kAAC pf fclA gl»«SlA4gA: W ett? AEAfI, CMAWlCAAtA. Ag*"**. ——. * •M C amII A^AA IaA PMPAAAA wf lAWAAAlgAtlAA aa4 voriftcattOTi of Olio wo^9t: ( /ff. ____ Applicant's Signature K ■T. A X /y^/Z9 Date Owner's Signature Date a t\T T %9 r. r**t / < MCM4 DEPART»CNT'OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS. MN 5S487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAME « 77AX rAY£IK ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FRof> A1>l>R IP t^IPp LOT BLK.PARCEL ^-//7-2S-Z3 PWwf«, If 3s 4«ma Ui*VA AV€ JI«CIA/0 ttf. mfOfilfAfo 117*1 Ciy6^ CAN'VA'tV v>r 3lt« ^uc T I /#^g CJAI^4‘ AV& MM S54-K Z / AAUfPi M- Ul/fAiAmc /4*»« SS4-IO iixi- Avir y/at /^. 5*cA^a<fn^jf i/J.v M70 ua /aa A^k 10lupAs. Wfe. '_____ //4«| C0MA CWttA AVg' /z «• #l( Cl f I 4* $l4/t£^4m B. Co¥0ni*f RJI ii*7tf >Mr«cA r*-3f3 •<^. iJiuU e^lisN|0 4^. ^/h«i dmf*i i e.fml ^ \ 'HaU \ 111*0 ir## ShH-kU IL u<!^«.40( IXl» |<IZ^ IX* t 4 -,r Rxifk li* 1^X4 411,41 ^7 2dJ2i2^J± 14- 1 n€S $>1-5 0/%! ^H0* nt%jit4 i^i*w /4 \ 0*4!cif ^ % /!*• --------- 3*X**344.<JZ ^7 -//-?-'2.^-^ / i«/V 1 M/.//IX* t 4*«ix f 1 i Cl % 4 ■ 7^ Bi/SJecr RA}f^pf 1vP0iMV»Uc%n0^*0**A •ni Irj# fgpn^-YtAtt^n «• informs* r*r«M> d Ik* M*im». C». »•«> <;• iw. . lA IM teat fli MV M«d iMirf. ^7-/?’I J C«rtiflc«to of Survey t I herald eertll^ that this la a true and correct represontatloa. of a survey of the boimdarlea of Lot 16, Loua Lindas and the loca-' tion of all exlstlnc buUdincs thereon, a rock nail, a vood fence, and a blacktopped parkin^ area. It does not purport to show other inprovonantn or encroachmentr.. Scale} 1* s AO* Date t 6-21-77 Iron Borker'••V. — • M . »*: i/ Cordon K. Coffin land Sto^eyor and Planner Lone Lake, Minnesota He , 6064 a V< ill rH • • f N 1/2 SEC. 8, T.U7, R.23 ice9,«>jm asj^. 2C> IT-'' ■ ■2^' VI.*;:'VS- - i-t. :■ ■■ r • * -V* :. 9^ • :mm^M^p!f: ^ ■V.- ^ VARIANCES REQUIRED Zoning Use District DENSITY mmmiw niuumiP VANlIkKCT cmt tccTiOW IM kM — Ult «l«Ui 4^-^J ^POaJ ^e -- - SETBACKS frf«nt| SI4« _ tl4« __ JUMT HlKlKUr. KPPVJMg PISTINC riio»osa>vMm^q COOC SCCTIOi js^>L _____% tl4f« lA Blif< 75 n. 74 rt.. HARDCOVER IXir ARCH JSML JLxli ____ BCRK2TTCD HARDCOVn mSTlKC HARDCOVUI J5 tJL._____ 711 or OSD HXRDCOVIJI « _______ TOTAL VXIIlAltCB J| »,f .____ O - 74 rt. • - 74 t4H« 74 - 74P rt. 740 - 400 W%. 70S lOO • lOOO 74. 34« % CfiO£JU£t|| 71.031 74. 74<P_ 74.707 74.707 OTHER SECTIONS gIfTBg.j£fi£gsB.vMiimet CPPt KCCTIQH ■.iUiMf ■aiVht Imb.I iNlM.} LAND « 0IVU1CHI 0l.t AVAllAOSLlTVi •4i«c«flt l©t»/p*rr«l« C«l JanuAry 1^775 dmrriMp IncliiOaat 4^ lalaahora _____wrllanOa O lo%«/parr«1» par applicatloii / leant oceaptnO _ •••• Rip 8tff«flr separate _ coabined with ether parcels net In this application aaparata rahip hlfh yramO laval pr rollinf miU anaaeal bullOinf locatiaiiOCOGJUrmr atfactiiif appll^ieat anaeyal let ahapa let aise/ahapai W^cofiaiatant inconaistant eith nalfhhorhoeO davalopaaiit ACCnOt _____ nee emlatina i^cit^ _ ceunty/etata _____ private ____ avallahla ^J4^cennact(OriLlTltSi City septic eyatee 11 City water aeistlfif confenti^ ___ avallahla aaiatlnf svbetanOarO aaletlnf LAND USE tub^act let la vacant occupied mSTlOC LAND USE PaCTOSAL affacta conparad to aoninf eaa district t conforniny principal acrasaery bulldinf er eae confomj conditional aacf ife nilef eaa STRUCTURES BI1ST1M OOIDIIWB Baficianciaat _____ lAL rVlEt __ do do not coeply with aoninf parfomance standards eill sntiraly ODf hulldinf er eaa revise as BDf haildlnf er eae fcoat sacasda 40S 7NV) ravie* as nPAMSlOM of aniatinf fcoat lass than 40K 7ffV| OaiMiaf haildlnf PAIR MARRCT UALOE fyr| ______ ___________ .Jl^eill not radec e an aniatinf aahatandard yard dieanaian TAXES & ASSESSMENTS teta/Mrcals m»mm4 la IRRSSi _____ era PAID era aarraat Isfally are DtUngUEPT to year inod tor tan purpoaaa. l•aal Its havladt units Uatar fno|units CITY OF ORONO ' LAND USE PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS EXHIBIT 6 Page 1 PREPARED FOR: BY: N«r>iiinf OunaaiBBion MBBtInf IIMtB) ^Hl 1^ f ^9 Ouvnctl IWBtinf ItMtal (ttBfo___________ «t»fn_______________________________;------------------------- APPLICATION^REVIEWED BY: l/ City AdaiifiistrAtac •. City Attorney City l^ifiMr Vill»9« rlann«r Soninf Ad«ifii0tr«t0r flannijif OoOTBiasion y«r1i OoHMlssioii |d«t«a| fa»t«s) riiblic Morks Coordinator Public Snfoty Dirocior rinanco Diroctor boildifif intpoetor Soptie Inspoctor NdUMpiffl Cty. DOT ninOB State DOT ninn, OHS SPECIAL COMMENTS STAFF R£(fDATION Bp^llCBtlM BB BVtaBttta* *WMW BV^lMttM •BkjMt t* tellMilit CMliitil «MU Bp^UcBtiM tM BMialoMl lnl«n«ttM> •^Ucstlaa «or vbbsom mm.m4 Bk»«B CITY OF ORONO UND USE PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS EXHIBI Page 2 SUGGESTED FINDINGS In Which mM l*n4 !• >oe*C«di O* eanCllloM •IVlytn* to thm otrocturo or Un4 to qiMallofi or* not paroli«r to .uch 1. — UlZadmlli F»«l»rty hot do .pply 9.o.r.lly to othor l.od o. .truetor.. lo th. district to whidi Mia iBfia u ioc«t«d. is is not nocssmary for the preservation and anjoynent of •the frantiny of the application ------- U ------ sttbetantial property riyht of the applicant. ^ th« fraittlnf of 0*s propossd varianc* -ill not to any -ay topatr tha pobUe haalth. aalaty. coolort. Borale or yenaral welfares oa ____,h. ,„ntto, of tha propoaad variance »ay topalr th. public haalto. aafaty. co-fort. «>r.l. or yeneral welfare. / .rantto. of th, propoaad v.ri.nc. -ill not b. contrary to th, tot,»t of th, Oo-pr.l-n.i-. load 0„ Plan or tha toniny Oadoi » n- ,r«itto, of th. propofd -arianc. would b. contrary to th. int.nt of th. Co-pr.h.n.i-. Plan or tha lonlny Ood«. / to. oranttof of auch v.ri.nc -ill «ct -ar.ly ..rv. aa a “»*^**"*;4? ^ a»lie-nt. but ta naca.aary to allciata da—onatratad hardships or diffIcultiasi Oh •S'Se ^p to. applicant ha. dcon.tr,t.d no racoyniaad h.rdrt.ip or difficlty and th.r.fora th. yrctinp of ceh ------variant woeld nerely serve as e convenience to such applicsntr iMa /- Ji SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL !• *AtJ a. U/sdijUm ASTVI^T 5i1iHOcCWhV^TCi^ CKl rAT:CiArrMka*!J« caiv*> V-LX ■ *<»»> * i» ■ ■ Sight CtiPE ELEVATION t W»r .V- , V ■.. 1■ ■ '01 1K TO: FROM: Planning Commission and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:November 20, 1979 SUBJECT: #529 Steve Wallack, 1400 Sixth Avenue North PAINTER CREEK SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Zoning District - RR - lA - 5 Acre Minimum This subdivision may be familiar to members who have been on the Commission for a few years. We are making use of the soils map and wetlands information from the previous application. The developer and staff have agreed to start anew with a sketch plan review of their proposed 13 lot plat. Lots 4 and 5, Block 3 have been divided without the City’s approval resulting with the usual taxing mix-ups. As a result the current ovmers of Lots 4 and 5 will be Involved with the plat. A condition of approval will be the combining of the subject lots with the individual owner's homestead lots. We will not require septic testing because they will not be recognized as buildable sites. The proposed plat offers 11 new build- able lots. We normally do not require septic testing for 5 acre lots but in this case, we must. The access road of 60* will be designated as an outlot. Staff will require that the road be moved to the east as it approches Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. The road as proposed goes through a designated wetland; moving the road further east will give lots 1, 2 and 3 more dry buildable area. The three lots are marginal and we may have to recommeud omitting one... or maybe twol After the requested road changes have been made, the developer must prove by septic testing that he has 11 buildable lots. Please review the septic inspector's memo. He reviews the many limitations amd sensitive areas associated with this kind of property. I have found two instances where a side and front yard setback does not meet the standard for a 5 acre minimum lot zone. (Lot 3, Block 3 and Lot 1, Block 1). This is just the beginning with this one. The developer as usual is in a hurry - the nature of the property dictates a slower, cautious pace. itor nue North PLAN REVIEW lO have been on the Commission ,1s map and wetlands information and staff have agreed to proposed 13 lot plat. It the City's approval i result the current owners A condition of approval i the individual owner's {Sting because they will not id plat offers 11 new build testing for 5 acre lots but &n outlot. Staff will require 3Ches Lots 1 and 2$ Block 1* 3 wetland; moving the road ry huridable area. The coimbei.'id omitting one. •. es have been made# the e has 11 buildabie lots, e reviews the many limitations of property. ront yard setback does not ne. (Lot 3, Block 3 and he developer as usual is in s a slower# cautious pace. M ^ cy Qk CITV OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Land Use Application property) Address Legal Description _ APPLICANT Name /C. Tel # Mailing Address y\/./A _ _ _ _ Tel #_2^£j±i/GKf^NER Name ~ Mailing . Address '^r~ Present Zoning ^_ _ _ _ _ type of REQUEST Subdivision $150+$10.00 U _ _ Conditional Use $50 Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($65) Date ^ec' d /a By /A ._ _ _ _ _ Present Use K-r f ✓ /” Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request Specify Ordinance Requirements _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Explain your request and reasons for same /'3 /c' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity _ Lot Area _ _ _ Setback Front_ _ Side _ _ _ Other# explain _ _ _ _ _ _ Rear Width Specify hardships to property SUBDIVISION application 4 Residential Other# explain NO. of Lots CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) Application completed Plat map section Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal Construction plans# if applicable Certified Property Oimer'a list o: owners within (300') (150')- from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center Stamped# legal sized envelopes (#10| pre-addressed to each of the names| on the above list. nxTE Applicant*# Signature ^ ^ DATE Osmer's Signature ___ Applicant hereby agrees to provide all information' required or requested by the Zoning Administrator# City Engineer# City Attorney# Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all fees as established by ordinance. TO:Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator FROM: Michael Cfaffron, Septic System Inspector DATE:November 16, 1979 SUBJECT:#529 Steve Wallack (TMG Dev.), 1400 Sixth Avenue North PAINTER CREEK SUBDIVISION The proposed subdivision is for 11 new lots plus 2 new lots to be included and combined with existing parcels. Total area of the project includes about 110-120 acres of which about 40% is designated wetland and an additional portion is low and could not/should not be considered as "dry buildable." (Glencoe and Hamel soils). After my field inspection of this property, I would say the proposal is optimistic in that much of the land not designated as wetland is, nevertheless, wet, has a seasonal very high water table, and is not conducive to development. My comments and recommendations based on soils, topography and the location of contiguous dry land areas, are as follows: Block 1 Lot 1 - With the proposed configuration, I doubt that 2 contiguous acres of dry buildable land are included. The division line between lots 1 and 2 should be moved eastward to divide the high ground into more equal-sized areas. Block 1 Lot 2 - See above. Both lots 1 and 2 should be required to have 2 contiguous acres of dry build able. The .oil on these lots is Lerdal Loam (LMB) with a percolation rate generally suitable for standard or mound systems but with a high water table generally requiring a mound or shallow trench system. We should require soil testing on these two lots. Block 2 Lot 1 - Soils on the lot include Lerdal Loam, Erin Loam, and Glencoe silty clay loam, and a desig nated wetland not previously included on any proposals. At best we could expect a mound system to be possible here. This lot does not contain two acres of what I would consider good dry buildable land. Block 2 Lot 2 - This land contains a l-acre+ wet land which divides the lot into two separate parcels high ground is mostly Erin soils which may support a standard or mound system. 1 #529 Steve Wellack Painter Creek Subdivision Page 2 Block 2 Lot 3 - Contains mainly Hamel soils in a wide swail facing the wetland to the north. Again we could expect at best a mound system with house location in a high water table soil. Block 2 Lot 4 - Wetlands map shows extension of wet land into this lot where not shown on developer's proposal. Hamel, Glencoe, and Lerdal soils will limit this site. We would expect to see a mound system here. Block 2 Lots 5 and 6 - These lots are mainly high ground with Erin soils which may support either a standard or mound system. Block 3 Lots 1 and 2 - There is barely 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable on these two lots combined. Soils include Peaty muck over loam, Erin and Glencoe. Lots 1 and 2 should be combined to form at best one building site. The resulting lot should definitely have soil testing done. Block 3 Lot 3 - Road should be moved eastward to take advantage of Erin soils and ensure that at least 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable are included. My reaction to the over-all sketch plan is that the road should be placed to skirt the wetlands and leave the best dry buildable land within the building lots. There are probably not as many buildable 5 acre lots as the developer wants due to soils and topography. Soil testing should be required on all lots with the possible exception of the two nearest County Road 6. Lot boundary changes should be made to include as much high, dry land as possible in each lot. We should carefully consider whether soil types such as Hamel and Glencoe can be considered as high and dry land since they can be expected to be seasonally saturated at or near the surface. 8,111 . BuB,BuC,BUD* BxB* BxC Burnsville sandy loam 0-30 m,x Co Cordova silty clay loam 100-300 *Cu Cut —- m DlA*DlB*OlC Dalbo silt loam 30-300 m^x Du Dundas silt loam 30-300 8,m EnB, EnC. EnD,^nE^Erin loam 30-300 8 (E8F>Erin & Kilkenny loam 30-100 *Fd Fill -— X Gc Glencoe silty clay loam 30-300-i' X Ha Hamel Loam 30-300 8,m HbB* HbC* HbD^^Hayden loam 30-100 8,in HcB2 * HcC2 * HcD2 ^E^Hayden clay loam 30-100 8 (HdP^Hayden & Lester loam 30-100 8#m HeB* HeC* HeD^He^Heyder sandy loam 30-100 *H1B*H1C*H1D*H1E Heyder • complex variable ID . KlcB*10cC*^Qc^)|^lc^Kilkenny loam 100-300 m K1C2.(^D^Kilkenny clay lo2un 100-300 . s#in LrB* LrC* LrD.^^ • Lester loam 30-100 8,m L8B2*LsC2*LsD2 Lester clay loam 30-100 X Lc,Ld Lake beaches sandy*loamy 10-100 m ijnB Lerdal loVf.30-300 ‘ m LtB LeSeur loam 30-100 X Ma Marsh -- tt,X Mt Minnetonka silty clay loam 30-300-I- m NeB Hessel loaun 30-100 X Pa*R>»Fkn Peaty muck b-over sand — ni-over loam — F t . TO:Council and Planning Coimnission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth» Zoning Administrator DATE:November 20, 1979 SUBJECT: #532 George Steiner, 700 County Road 6 - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Zoning District - RR-IB Subdivision - Plat - 8 lots Total Acreage - 33 acres The applicant proposes a plat of eight lots of a total 33 acre site. There is approximately 7 acres of designated wetlands, each lot must have the required 2 acres of dry buildable land. ACCESS: 1. Lots 2 and 4 will be served by Hillowbrook Drive. 2. Lot 3 may be served by either Willowbrook Drive or the private plat road depending on the building site. 3. Lots 1, 5, 6 and 7 will be served by existing driveway or plat road. 4. Lot 8 - the applicant has asked for an easement for driving purposes through lot 7. Staff recommends lot 8 be realigned to allow a 20* corridor to access on the plat road. 5. County will review existing access to serve 6 building sites. 6. Public Works Director will review the 'access areas off Willowbrook Drive (public road). WETLANDS: the City will take a flowage and conservation easement over the 7 acres of wetlands. EASEMENTS: the City will take the underlying utility easements over the road outlot. SEPTIC TESTING: 1. Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 must have the required septic testing. 2. Lot 5 - existing system to be inspected and potential area for alternate system. DEDICATION: applicant must dedicate 40* of right of way to the County for CSAH 6, this will also include the extended culvert area. ■ V. 5 - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW total 33 acre site. andSr each lot roust lowbrook Drive. .owbrook Drive or the ilding site. by existing driveway 3r an easeroent for t recororoends lot 8 to access on the plat s to serve 6 building sites the 'access areas off servation easeroent over itility easeroents over have the required spected and potential it of way to the County I extended culvert area* R%^Il property) Address ^ Ijegal Description __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ APPLICANT Name- SS^ilNNESOTA Land Use Application TYPE OF REQUEST Mailing Address CJ. CWNER Naroe Mailing Address _ Tel # Present Zoning (t R Subdivision §150+$10.00, _ Conditional Use $50 Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($65) Date Rec ’ d -y y _ By ^ Present Use Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request —^ Specify Ordinance Requireroents _ _A-^ ^rjS- - Explain your request and reasons for saroe ^ C^C m ^ 11 c/ ' y / ^ i ■T'pquired — extent of nonconformity lo^^^ea ____ Setback Front __ ____ Other, explai Rear Width Specify hardships to SUBDIVISION application Residential Other, explain No. of Lots CONDITIONAL U$E AND OTHER - explain proposed use ^property in detail MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR C0MPI£TE APPLICATl * (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Ccumission meeting) j Application completed Plat map section Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal Construction plans, if applicable 6. Certified Property CVner's list ol o%mers within (300*) (150')- from Hennepin Co. Dei>t. of Finance A-603 Government Center Stamped, legal sized envelopes(#lf p]^e-addressed to each of the namei on the above list. DATE I kvl-f DATE Applicant's Signature Owner' s Signature , ^ 1 Applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all fees as established by ordinance. 5/70 fI£TE APPLICAt/«3« Oo—iis»ion me»t^.ng) urtified Property Cfcmer’s list o mere within (300*) (150*)-fro« ennepin Co. De|^. of Finance >603 Government Center tamped, legal sized envelopes(«1 re-addressed to each of the name 0 tiie above list. re .'f _^ f ^ 1 .<■ ^*^***X a<^ sation required or requested by Y Attorney, Planning Commission St ion and further agrees to pay 1 TO:Planning Coinmission and Coxincil FROM:Alan P. Olson, City Planner DATE:November 21, 1979 SUBJECT: Proposed Code Amendments - Accessory Buildings After discussion at the Joint Planning Commission-Council meeting on November 17, and several reminders from the Council before that, I believe that now is the time to make some simple amendments to the accessory building sections of the zoning code* A public hearing is scheduled for the Planning Commission's December 10 meeting right after the hearing on the fence ordinance. Section 31.300 is quite permissive now with no restriction on the number of accessory buildings (except by hardcover); no story re striction on height; and no area restriction except 1,000 sq. ft. which is equivalent to a 20 x SO building or a 5-car garage. I suggest that the intent of the comprehensive plan and zoning code can better be achieved if the size, height, and number of accessory buildings are more closely related to the size of each lot and the density of the neighborhood. We are after all a rural/urban City and the needs of rural residents is far different than the capacity of urban lots to support niunerous accessory buildings. Experience also suggests that over-sized or multi-story accessory buildings too often are used or converted for non-residential or apartment purposes in direct conflict with the code. An actual ordinance draft will be done before the December 10 and 11 meetings after I receive feedback from the following suggestions: 1. Number and size of Accessor*' Buildings on residential lots. a) On lots of 10,00 sq. ft. or less gross area: No more than 1 accessory building, not to exceed 600 sq. ft. in area (24 x 24 double garage>576 sq. ft.) b) On lots in excess of 10,000 sq. ft. but less than 43,560 sq. ft. gross area: No more than 2 accessory buildings, not to exceed 1,000 sq. ft. in total area. c) On lots in excess of 1 acre but less than 3 acres: No more than 2 accessory buildings, neither of which shall exceed 1,000 sq. ft. in area. d) On lots in excess of 3 acres gross area (smallest size allowed for horses): No more than 2 accessory buildings neither of which shall exceed 1,000 sq. ft. in area except one accessory building may exceed 1,000 sq. ft. when it is to be used as a barn or stable. Additional or larger accessory buildings to be permitted KSa f’ TO:Planning Conunission and Council FROM:Alan P. Olson, City Planner DATE:November 21, 1979 SUBJECT: Proposed Code Amendments - Accessory Buildings After discussion at the Joint Planning Commission-Council meeting on November 17, and several reminders from the Council before that, I believe that now is the time to make some simple amendments to the accessory building sections of the zoning code. A public hearing is scheduled for the Planning Commission's December 10 meeting right after the hearing on the fence ordinance. Section 31.300 is quite permissive now with no restriction on the number of accessory buildings (except by hardcover); no story re striction on height; and no area restriction except 1,000 sq. ft. which is equivalent to a 20 x 50 building or a 5-car garage. I suggest that the intent of the comprehensive plan and zoning code can better be achieved if the size, height, and number of accessory buildings are more closely related to the size of each lot and the density of the neighborhood. We are after all a rural/urban City and the needs of rural residents is far different than the capacity of urban lots to support numerous accessory buildings. Experience also suggests that over-sized or multi-story accessory buildings too often are used or converted for non-residential or apartment purposes in direct conflict with the code. An actual ordinance draft will be done before the December 10 and 11 meetings after I receive feedback frcxn the following suggestions: 1. Number and size of Accessory Buildings on residential lots. a) On lots of 10,00 sq. ft. cr less gross area: No more than 1 accessory building, not to exceed 600 sq. ft. in area (24 x 24 double garage-576 sq. ft.) i b) On lots in excess of 10,000 sq. ft. but less than 43,560 sq. ft. gross area: No more than 2 accessory buildings, not to exceed 1,000 sq. ft. in total area. c) On lots in excess of 1 acre but less than 3 acres: No more than 2 accessory buildings, neither of which shall exceed 1,000 sq. ft. in area. d) On lots in excess of 3 acres gross area (smallest size allowed for horses): No more than 2 accessory buildings neither of which shall exceed 1,000 sq. ft. in area except one accessory building may exceed 1,000 sq. ft. when it is to be used as a barn or stable. Additional or larger accessory buildings to be permitted a<4»fe,c..i Proposed Code Amendments - Accessory Buildings November 21, 1979 Page 2 for agricultural purposes, greenhouses, guest houses or recreational purposes pursuant to issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. e) No more than one small, portable wood or metal storage shed not to exceed 100 sq. ft. in area may be placed on any residential lot in addition to the per manent accessory buildings as above (i.e. Sears shed, ice fishing house, etc.). 2. Height and bulk of residential accessory structures: a) Residential accessory structures to be one story only except as follows: 1) Two stories permitted for storage or garage purposes when both levels are accessible on grade. 2) Storage loft permitted in attic space. 3) Two story by Conditional Use Permit. b) Maximum height to be 20 ft., or height of principle residential structure, whichever is less, except for barns, stables and guest houses. 3. Crowding: When more than one accessory structure is to be placed on any lot, they should be setback at least 10 ft. from each other or a distance equal to H the height of the highest building, whichever is greater. 4. Location: Garages and other accessory buildings may be located 10 ft. from street right of way on lakeshore lots provided all garage doors open into lot and away from street and a turnaround is provided on the lot. !b1 u ST"'m I* % i 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW City of Independence PREPARED BY: Tom Loucks and Associates RECEIVED:October 28, 1979 REVIEWED BY: Alan P. Olson, November 13, 1979 Independence is 35 miles square with approximately 2,500 residents. The City has effectively no commercial, industrial or institutional land use, relying on neighboring communities for services and facilities. The predominant land use is agriculture although this use is stated as being in transition, with loss of some agricultural land to housing and decline in certain agricultural activities such as dairy farming. Lake Rebecca Park Reserve is a major land use with supporting roles played by The Luce Line Trail and Morris T. Baker Park Reserve (although Baker is not in Independence). Major environmental assets include Lakes Sarah, Rebecca, Robina, Haughey, Fox, Tom and Independence, Pioneer Creek and Painter Creek, and many marshlands and wetlands. The City has no public water or sewer and plans none. Transportation planning is all auto-oriented using the existing network with minor statements about County plans for straightening 110 and 19. There is no detailed discussion, but the tone of the plan suggests that they expect highway 12 to become a freeway "after 2000." The Land Use Plan is to retain very limited commercial and industrial areas along highway 12 west of Maple Plain, perhaps near County Road 92. The remainder of the City is to be split about 1/3 "non-urban" residential at 5 acres per unit, and 2/3 agricultural at 40 acres per unit. The area adjacent to Orono would be some of each. The whole tone is one of "staged growrh' with most new development to be in the "non-urban" area around Maple Plain. Attached is a suggested draft of the review letter to be sent to Independence. c^ J Telephone 473-7.’l57 CITYof ORONO Poet Office Bo« 6<i*CryeUl Bey. MinnceoU 55323* Municipal OfTicee On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka November 13* 1979 Honorable Jerry Mevissen, Mayor Mr. Vern Genzlinger, Planning Commission Chairman Council and Planning Commission Members City of Independence Rt. He Box 123A Maple Plain, MN 55359 Dear Mayor Mevissen and Chairman Genzlinger: Thank you for providing the City of Orono the opportunity to review and comment on your proposed Comprehensive Plan. The goals and plans of Independence appear to be consistent with and supportive of those of Orono. We agree that agriculture or quasi-agricultural uses are important to our area and that spreading urban density is definitely an exclusionary type of land use which destroys the social fabric of a rural community. We too believe that low density rural-residential land use should be an acceptable permanent use, especially on the type of land in our area. Your continued reliance on the rural centers of other municipalities for urban-type services is the same philosophy as ours - shared services without unnecessary, uneconomic duplication. Your existing (and proposed) 5 acre residential zoning is identical with our existing zoning on the area which is expected to r^ain the same. Orono is not presently considering a 1 to 40 agricultural zone because we do not have the active agricultural uses that you have. As for transportation, Orono does not now foresee any major re construction or relocation of highway 12. As you know, however, we are currently completing a new road connecting County 19 with County 6 which we expect will improve route choices in the area and also attract drivers away from Lake Minnetonka and County 15 We have yet to see what effect this will have on the County's plans for 110 and 19. i ^ 1 I City of Independence November 13» 1979 Page 2 We look forward to sending our revised Community Management Plan to Independence in the near future. If you should have any questions or concerns« please address them to Walter R. Benson# City Administrator. Sincerely, William B. Van Nest# Mayor WBVN:dmj cc: Metro Council The largest segment of mixed quality homes, although iso lated, generally appears on Woodhill Drive and South Lake Sarah Drive around Lake Sarah, and a small portion around Lake Independence. As mentioned previously, most of the homes are former summer units that, for the roost part, have been convert ed into year-round homes. Potentially these homes offer prob lems in terms of planning, zoning, sewage disposal and * aesthetics. LAt^O OS£ I I 11 \ \ n - ^ m m m m m m. « i N i i i I Broad Goals And Objectives Independence residents have expressed the desire to create a rural community that establishes itself as a friendly, com- fortable, and aesthetically pleasant place to live, work and play where growth and change is encouraged but not at the soc ial and economic expense of the existing and future residents. The City must be one within which people can reasonably afford to live, and one which allows and encourages resident participation in all areas of public decision-making. There fore the following Broad Goals and Objectives were set forth to serve as guidelines for preparation of the Comprehensive Guide Plan. *Provide for a mixture of rural residential and agricultural lifestyles within the community. *Encourage rural residential development in areas where services can be most economically provided. *Utilize to a maximum efficiency public services before expanding into new land areas or con structing new facilities, i.e., highways and roads. *Preserve significant open spaces and natural systems* ^Provide for limited retail commercial services and industrial development in an effort to expand the tax base and provide employment opportunities and services that are now not available in the community. ♦Provide a wide range of housing opportunities that will accommodate all income levels. •Provide a variety of experiences and opportunit ies for residents in terms of living, %rarking and social activities. •Plan for and enforce standards for development which will enhance public health and the main tenance of a quality standard of living. - 28 - r .Tit ^0H • Rural Center Concept The "Rural-center” is not a new concept in view of the fact that it is one that is readily identifiable in nearly every ^ agriculturally oriented comnunity in the United States. As a matter of fact, many elements of this concept have existed or currently exist in a modified form in the Lyndale area of Independence and the City of Maple Plain. What is new or at least experimental about the concept is not only introducing it, but sustaining it in an urban fringe community that will roost certainly in the future be subjected to metropolitan development pressure. The "Rural-center" principle provides a focal point for distribution of goods and services on an area-wide basis. Agricultural areas have historically oriented toward small or medium sized towns which can provide utilitarian services, (doctor, dentist, veternarian, lawyer, bank, post office, church, school, etc.), commodities (groceries, drugs, clothing, implement dealers, etc.) and also a market place (grain elevat or, rail or transportation head) for farm product distribution. Subsequently, because of the demand for the aforementioned elements an urban setting which provides urban services is created to respond to the needs of a large (geographically) rural clientele. In the case of Independence there is a very strong desire on the part of City residents to maintain the economic viability of agriculture, encourage the development of semi-rural hobby farms. If these aforementioned factors have been correctly inter preted, the "Rural-center" concept provides a planning solution that is not usually achieved because of the inability of planners and city”orficials to implement long range planning policies that will accommodate and allow to co-exist both urban and non- urban lifestyles. The key to this concept is that Independence City officials and residents must recognize that large acre low density develop ment (agricultural and hobby farm land uses) must be coBq>leroented with urban land uses (higher density housing, commercial services, industrial development) in order to provide f- range or variation in housing opportunities, lifestyles, and scs*.ices that can be economically affordable by s>any income leVeii^. -29 - fmr- **vi a^velop^enO exclusionary in spite of t directed toward providing cause today's and future brSeneficial topublic services and opportunities that will be oene greater numbers of people- I„ su»m«y, ti;ru»neco,n!“iS‘S2d"p?a:X for future developnent patterns The following are three basic elements of the "Rural- center" : Urban Neighborhood n-h*. urban Neighborhood is the main activity center wWcS pSvilil for aocial interaction, entertain- TCnt, schools, oo™“f=4“^,®®r;i??5 ’,i3'*mSlti- uses, higher density single family and mul family housing, and a J^f^f^trails.a^ive recreational spaces and pedestrial trails. It is the goal of Independence not to provide ?^Ser “?riel?'u^S the neighboring communities SScS Is Sap^e^iSn and Delano for such servrces. Non-Urban Neighborhood The Non-urban Neighborhood sidential in character and will ® t®'' density environment which receives its basic service needs from the urban "®i?hborhood. As TpIaSning entity it should be «l®f Jl® to*^accommodate agricultural uses as well as non-urban residential uses. Agricultural Neighborhood The Agricultural Neighborhood is established for sDecific purpose of sustaining farming as iolg tl™ ecoSSiically viable land use. This neiahborhood should require limited services (nolice and fire protection) while at the same time it will be functionally part of the co^un- ity because it will have the serv^es PJ°". grLis of the non-urban neighborhood available t it. - 30 - 1 ' 1 \ ^ iMi i«l rn* .♦» fVC 1 f1 j ... S n " H *v • t •■ i i !i iilill!M!ll llil^il llillll ' I ET »• • - transportationY OF INDEPENDENCE plan Thofoughfar*r M Telephone 473-T357 * •y.m^^ITY J "•-^OF I .OR ON 6 CITY of ORONO P<»t Office Bm G6«Cryiul Bay, MinneaoU 55323* Municipal Office* On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka j November 20, 1S79 Mr. Alexander Holzer 2677 Casco Point Road Wayzata# MN 55391 RE: #436 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Dear Mr. Holzer: This letter is to remind you that you signed Resolution 1079 and therein promised to do the required wall corrections no later than December 1# 1979# now only 2 weeks away. As of our last visit to the site, you have not yet started removal of any blocks. The weather is perfect. I do hope you get the wrk done so tags will not have to be issued. . Olson Cjfby Planner APO:dj Enclosure cc: City Council Resolution No. 1079 Page 3 e Kn\t work required to correct and restore areas on neighbor's pro^rties shall be negotiated between the parties as a private matter and xs not a part of these conditions. f^^OOTi Owork sl«ll be co."Plfbf? vegetation may be deferred and/or completed next ®P^^2?ision .^^^ailure to satisfactorily complete the ^,J^j!sidered a violation of the zoning code punishable as ^*a misdemeanor as provided therein. ?i TOlIplSl^tta"So?k“MCMdin9'’U these“conditlons. // • • ZZ //./y- GTieta Hoizar </ Date AOTEST:Robert Mitcheal Date \ Adopted by the City Council of the City ^ O^o onj the day of » 1979. William ^'^'^nWest, Mayor ATTEST: 7^ Walter ^ Ber^onp Clerk/Administrator TO:Council FROM:Alan P. Olson, City Planner DATE:November 20, 1979 SUBJECT:#500 Timothy Peterson, 280 Orono Orchard Road CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE This application has twice previously been on the Council agenda and been tabled at the request of the applicant. It is being placed back on the agenda because two deadlines for information submittal have past without complete information supplied, because the application has not been amended to conform to the City's perform.?nce standards for height, and because of continuing work on the tower which resulted in t%ra citations being issued last week. The antenna was originally installed last spring without any permits. Upon receipt of complaints, the building inspector visited the site on May 31st and advised Mr. Peterson of the violations and the need for an application and Council approval if the tower were to remain. After repeated calls by the Staff, an uf-'lication was made on July 20, 1979. c 5 The original application was for one 85 ft. antenna (as already built) plus a second 120 ft. antenna to be used for comnercial and hobby use. The Planning Commission recommended denial of this application on September 10, 1979. (The application had been tabled at the August 13 meeting because the applicant was not present and had been reviewed in work session at the August 27 meeting.) At the September 25 Council meeting, the application was tabled at the request of the applicant although Council did see the packet and did request additional information as listed in my letter of September 27. After this letter, I received a call from the applicant's attorney who promised the requested information and who said that the application was to be amended to one 65 ft. antenna, therefore removing any need for a variance. See my let .er of October 10, 1979. With this under standing, and lacking the information. Council again on October 16 tabled the application until the November 13 meeting. The November 5 cut-off date for the November 13 agenda past with receipt of a letter from Mr. Ne%nnan amending the application to one hobby antenna as built, with copies of the FCC amateur radio license ' but no other information. My letter of November 8 set a new final deadline of November 19 for all information requested on September 27. As of November 20, the City has not received a list of equipment or power in use, has not received an engineering design for the tower (an undesignated catalog is useless) and has not received any offer of legal hardship explaining the need for a 91 ft. antenna. 1 1500 Timothy Peterson November 20« 1979 Page 2 As the application stands today, with the survey verification. Hr. Peterson requests the following: 1. A Condition Use Permit for one hobby antenna. 2. A Variance to permit keeping the existing 91.3 ft. antenna vs. maxim:im 65 ft. per 34.033. Note that the photos enclosed are some taken by Tom Jacobs on September 18, 1979. They show one horizontal beam on the top vs. the two in place after the work done on November 15, 1979. Also there is a hole dug for the foundation of the second antenna near the corner of the house. cc:Peterson Attorney Newman Attorney Jaeqer CITY of ORONO I'liKt Offirr t(ua 66* Crystal Bay, Minittsola 55323* Municipal Offices Telephone 473^7357 Control • No .498 TO: Mr. Charles Carl 3685 North Shore Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Meeting Date lO-jO-Tg Notice Date 10-31-79 Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Subdivisionr Final Vacation_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Copies to: Mr. John Gerhardson _2L s — --------- 777 ' I ♦»»********-*'A ******* * * *'A A A A' A-A'************ * A.kkAkAkkkkAkkkkk kkirkie^k AAAAAAAA* kk'k*Xkkt COUNCIL ACTION Vote: For _JL Against _ _Abstention MOTION As you heard> the City Council considered your request for vacation irtion of the lake access next to your property and they, denied request finding that the property has no unusual topographical conditions that would hamper future public use; specifically, thej^ could not establish a finding that this property is totally unusable for any possible public purpose and therefore are prohibited by law DEADLINE DATE _ for submittal of new information (application may be considered formally withdrawn if information or explanation is not provided). for Work Permit application for work to begin for work to be completed WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning work. VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved plans. Do not change plans. CONDITIONAL I CE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all information and/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Zoning Administrator. FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must have drawings, resolution and all other required documents recorded, with certification of such recording returned to the City by deadline date. Certified copies of official City Council Minutes may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeting date. CITYof ORONO Control No . 512 »..M uffiir b-'» bb«Ciy*ul B»y. MinnMuta K>323»Municip«l Office* Telephone 473-7357 TO:Mr. Kirk S. Boroan 951 Spring Hill Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Meeting Date 10-30-79 Notice Date 10-31-29 Variance XX Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Subdivision,* Final Copies to: »*lHHMkiHHrt«MtiHH«)HHHMH«iHHkiHHhHt«r*«*««:«««**«*************************** *'**** - - ' *—j-*-.- AbstentionCOUNCIL ACTION Vote:For 1 Against reviewed upon complaint per Ordinance Section 32.490; and 3) to the property nwner's understanding that this approval does not vest any_ rights beyond that- specifically approved and that the tower is to be removed should the property change ownership. Th? rnunc^ii speciffound f-hai- this nrnpnsfll requires HQ vartancfta. from 38.900 or 34.033. DEADLINE DATE for Work Permit application for work to begin for work to be completed t. WCRK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on app. wed plans. Ds not change plans. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. . . PESLIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all information ar.d/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Zoning r^L^SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must have drawings, resolution ar.d all other required documents recorded, with certification of such recording returned to the City by deadline date. Certified copies of official City Council Minutes may be obtained by ccntacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeting date. CITY of ORONO r»st Ofr>ir Hox G6«CrykUl Bay. MinnraoU U323*Municipal Ofricct Telephone 473-7357 Control No . S19 Meeting Date 10-30-79 TO:Mr. Kenneth G. Hartwell 2659 Casco Point Road Hayzata, Minnesota 55391 Notice Date 10-31-79 XX Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Subdivision,* Final Copies to: k**VHt**4Ht*******VHt**************************************************************** COUNCIL ACTION Vote: For _0_ Against Abstention MOTION Council approved your request for a side yard setback vartance to allow expansion of your existing garage by 3 ft. as proposed finding hardships of existing garage and tree locations as per the Planning DEADLINE DATE October 30, 1980 for submittal of new information (application may be considered formally withdrawn if information or explanation is not provided}. for Work Permit application for work to begin for work to be completed WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning woirlc VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved plans. Do not change plans. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all Intormatlon and/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Zoning FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Appli^'ant nsist have drawings, resolution and all other required documents recorded, with certification of sue recording returned to the City by deadline date* Certified copies of official City Council Minutes may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeting date. L CITYofORONO Control No.520 I'li.sl Office Bok 66•Crystal Bay. Minnehola ^323*Municipal Officet Telephone 473-7357 TO: Meeting Date 10~30-79 Notice Date 10-31-79 Mr. Grady Sie£f 1080 Wildhurst Trail Mound, Minnesota 55364 Copies to: Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision. Preliminary Subdivision.* Final k**1t*itkkk'kkkkAAk*Ai!lrk*irk-k*irk****irk-k'k***1e-k*ir*****-k****-k*irtrkkkkAkkAkkkkkAkAk*r*****1r COUNCIL ACTION Vote: 5 For 0 Against _ _Abstention MOTION Council approved your request for a front yard setback variance to allow construction of your garage as proposed at least 10.0 feet—from the street riQht-of-wav. finding hardships of lot shape, house and driveway location per Planning Conunission recommendation, subject to no new curb cut with all doors opening onto the existing driveway. DEADLINE DATE October 30, 1980 for submittal of new information (application may be considered formally withdrawn if information or explanation is not provided). for Work Permit application for work to begin for work to be completed WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning work. VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved plans. Do not change plans. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all information and/or Jraprovements required for final approval. Contact Zoning Administrator. FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must have drawings, resolution and all other required documents recorded, with certification of such recording returned to the City by deadline date. Certified copies of official City Council Minutes may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeting date. i r ta ■ CITY of ORONO Control No. iiM iiffire lioK 66•Crystal Bay. MinnrKoU 5S323«Municipal OfficifS Telephone 473*7357 TO: Meeting Date 10-30-79 Westwood Enterprises, Inc. 5800 Star Lane Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Notice Date lQ-31-79_ _ _ _ XX Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Subdivision,* Final ICopies to: Marjorie Herbruck rtHe****************»***********************AAA-a.*********************AAAAir********<n( COUNCIL ACTION Vote: _s_ _0_ Against _ _Abstention MOTION The City Council approved vour request for a front yard setback. variance to allow construction of the garage as proposed,—finding hardships of well and septic system location and steep slopes^ per Planning Commission reconunendation. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! DEADLINE DATE October 31, 1980 for Work Permit application for work to begin for work to be completed L WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning woxrlc •VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved plans. Do not change plans. , . CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all information and/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Zoning FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must have drawings, resolution and all other required documents recorded, with certification of such recording returned to the City by deadline date. Certified copies of official City Council Minutes may be obtained ^>y contacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeting date. 1 CITYof ORONO Control No. . 524 Tithi Uffice Boi 66«CrytUl Bay. MannaaoU 55323 •Municipal OfTicca Telephont 473-7357 Meeting Date H~13-79 Notice Date __________ TO:A.R. Backstrom 1973 Eagerness Pt. Rd. Wayzata, MN 55391 Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision. Preliminat SubdivisioA, Final Copies to: I COUNCIL ACTION Vote: _s. for __0_ Against _ _Abstention ■ MOTION Pnuncii aonroved vpnr Application for a front-yflrd setback Variance to allow rnnstructlon of a new oaraae 2 feet from FaqernPRR Point Road finding a hardship of topoaraohy. and a hardcover variance tQ allQM. construction of the 20 x 28 ft. garage the 8 x 28 ft. addition to the house, finding a hardship of lot size and existing house COn= figuration; both as per the Planning Conunission Recommendations-- - - Garage is to be one story rfith a flat roof.- - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - ♦ ■ ■ ■ * " ~ rAAAAA**** **********************************'*'************************** **********^ DEADLINE BATE Movember 13. 1980 for submittal of new information (application may be consider^ formally withdrawn if information or explanation is not provided). for Work Permit application for work to begin for work to be completed WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning work. VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved plans. Do not change plans. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all informatioi and/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Zoning Administrator. FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must have drawings, resolution and all other required documents recorded, with certification of smch \ recording returned to the City by deadline date. Certified copies of official City Council Minutes may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeting data CITY of ORONO Control No. 527 1 I’lifti Uffire H oi 66* Crystal Bay, Minnriota 55323* Municipal Offices Telephone 473 7357 TO:Donald Hagen 1014 Excelsior Ave. So. Hopkins, NN 55101 Meeting Date ll~13-79 Notice Date _ _ _ _ Variance i Conditional Use Permit | Subdivision, Preliminar^ Subdivlsioit, Final | Copies to: ********************************************************************************** • COUNCIL ACTION Vote: _5. For _o. Against _ _Abstention MOTION approvfi(j your front- yard setiback variancp a 1 1 nw riirf inn of a 2$ X 32 garage findiny a hardship of access logat-inn and Ini-- - - - - - k' topography and per Planning Commission reconunendatirms. nr>frin9 t-.hat. proposed location has been revised to place garaae 15 feet from mad subject to provision of a turnaround on the lot and to removal nf the existing shed within 30 davs of garage completion.- --- - - - - - - - - - - ] •»*♦★★******************■*******************"**•*******************************'****** DEADLINE DATE November 13. 1980 for submittal of new information (application may be considered formally withdrawn if information or explanation is not provided). for Work Permit application for work to begin for work to be completed WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning \K>rk. VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved plans. Do not change plans. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL e7q>ires upon change of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all information and/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Zoning Administrator. FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must have drawings, resolution and all other required documents recorded, with certification of such recording returned to the City by deadline date. Certified copies of official City Council Minutes may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeting date. CITYof ORONO Control No. 1 INitft Office Boa 6b«Cr.vsi. Bay. Minnenota &S32^i«Municipal Offices Triephone 473-7357 O. E. Fisher Jr. 5501 Norman Center Drive Meeting Date 11-13-79 Notice Date _ _ _ _ _ Minneapolis. MN 55437 Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Prelimina: Subdivlsiod. Final Copies to: -********************iHtJHHt*»*HHHHMHHir********************************************* COUNCIL ACTION Vote: For _0 Against Abstention MOTION approved renewal of this lot area/lot width variance for Pan! per Planning Commission original conditions including; y«»iiir»val r>f Mnbi le Home, two existing garages, existing slabs and gravel Hriv#»waya prior to issuance of building permit; resoddinq all disturbed ar«»agt of lot Combination? aciess permit from Hennepin County?- - no agt^HaoV nr hardcover variances. NOTEt the plans as submitted leave only 3fil square feet for driveway, sidewalk, patio, etc, hardcover; ALL hardcover must be limited to 2525 square feet or less which may require house redesign to allow sufficient driveway. ************* A*********** A JliA*AA*AA** A A** AA AAA* ********* A*************** ****** ***» DEADLINE DATE November 13. 1980 for submittal of new information (application may be considered formally withdrawn if information or explanation is not provided). for Work Permit application for work to begin for work to be completed X X WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning work. VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved plans. Do not change plans. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all informatioi and/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Zoning Administrator. FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must have drawings, resolution and all other required documents recorded, with certification of such recording returned to the City by deadline date. Certified copies of official City Council Minutes may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeting data CITYof ORONO Control No.494 l*oNt Officr Box 66 •Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 •Municipal Offices Telephone 473 7357 TO: Meeting Date 11-13-79 Notice Date _ _ _ Henry S. Kingman 625 No. Ferndale Wayzata, MN 55391 Copies to: Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Subdivision*. Final k1tirk*1rk4rk**irk*****icirk*irk*irk**irk**1rkic*irk**iHe1rk*ick*irk***irkirk*-k***** * A * ************* COUNCIL ACTION Vote: t; For _a Against _ _Abstention MOTION rrmnr?'! 1 /^nnr»<»p»njin y appi»f>\/or1 ara.a an/i-uar^ anna par application, and renewal of side yard setback variance per 1^70 i nf>r;i»mher 18. 1978 finding hardship of lot shape and no additinnal land available. Council denied lakeshore setoack variance or hardrnvAr_ _ _ _ _ _ variance within 75 feet of lake or 26 feet of pond finding no <1gmnnstrat.ed hardship. Final action to be at November 27. 1979 meeting with adoption 0 of resolution - draft copy attached._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ See attached site sketch for buildable area. DEADLINE DATE November 13. 1980 for submittal of new information (application may be considered formally withdrawn if information or explanation is not provided). for Work Permit _ _ application for work to begin for work to be completed WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector beTore beginning xjork. VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shewn on approved plans. Do not change plans. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ovmership or use, or on deadline date specified above. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all information and/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Zoning Administrator. '^INAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must have drawings, resolution and all other required documents recorded, with certification of sr^rh recording returned to the City by deadline date. Certified copies of official City Council Minutes may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeting date. CITYof ORONC)Control No. 511 l*o«ci Office lioi (i6«Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 •Municipal Offices Telephone 473 7357 TO: Fred Herfurth Meeting Date 11-13 Notice Date 730 East Lake Street Wayzata. MN 55391 Variance Conditional Use Peraiit Subdivision, Preliminai Subdivision. Final Copies to: Gordin Coffin V********************************************************************************i COUNCIL ACTION Vote: __5_ For _a_ Against_ _Abstention MOTION Potincil approved preliminary snhnivision per attached m Also attached are 1 copy of each required easement; _ _ _1 Road & Utilities_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 Private Driveway with maintenance covenants 1 Flowaoe t Conservation _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 1 Open Space ***************** A A* A AAA AAA-A-A-** A-A-AAjM>r*****A A* A»<rlr* A A A* A* A A ********* ********** DEADLINE DATE November 13. 1980 ____________ . X for submittal of new information (application may be considered formally withdrawn if information or explanation is not provided). for Work Permit application for work to begin for work to be completed WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning work. VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved plans. Do not change plans. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownership or use. ‘ or on deadline date specified above. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL > Applicant must provide all inforroatioi and/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Zoning Administrator. FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must have drawings, resolution and all other required documents recorded, with certification of such recording returned to the City by deadline date. Certified copies of official City Council Minutes may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeting date i Telephone 473*7357 CITY OF ORONO CITY of ORONO Poat Office Boi 66*Crysul Bay, MinncaoU 55323 • Municipal Officea On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka November 1, 1979 Mr. Robert Pope Pope Associates, Inc. 533 St. Clair Avenue Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Mr. David Delane/ 4800 Casamita Road Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Re: 4491 First National Bank of Navarre Dear Messrs. Pope and Delaney: On October 30, 1979, the City Council approved your building and site plans dated October 18, 1979, including a setback variance for the rear parking to be 3 feet from the proposed lot line. The Council asked that the bank o«mers provide a letter of intent to the City regarding future cooperation on a driveway interconnect with the adjoining property. The flowage and conservation easement is acceptable as drafted except that the elevation covered should be 940, not 938. An open space/maintenance easement or agreement should be d.'afted by you to cover the installation and maintenance of the required berm and landscaping, with the City named as a joint grantee. The indusi-rial revenue bond resolution No. 1087 was approved and the public hearing called for 7:30 P.M., November 27, 1979. The subdivision is scheduled for hearing at the Planning Commission meeting of November 26, 1979. In order to obtain a building permit, you will need to submit three (3) sets of the final plans, specs, energy calculations, etc., two (2) signed copies of the coirrected flowage easement to the City, a copy of the open space/maintenance agreement with evidence that it has been recorded, and the various fees per my last letter. Demolition permits are required to remove the existing dwelling and outbuildings. 'aay ¥, cnson Viliii^e Planner as Jacobs. Building Inspector ' }; i! d #532 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION POR GEORGE R. STEINER Im/ )mf t*, ,t,t/ 9 , 0^ to mun •' 0/ M, /0f4 0/4^ snif ^ /» •Vf ft L \ >1^:.