The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-27-1979 Planning PacketAGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 27, 1979 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:30 P.M CALL TO ORDER 1. Call to Order/Roll ACTION ITEMS r- r. 4. #460 #499 #502 Samuel Marfield, 2465 Scotch Pine Lane - VARIANCE John Guthrie, 325 Sixth Avenue North - SUBDIVISION (FINAL) Ronald Christensen, 3587 North Shore Drive - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE s'. /• #505 #506 Phillip Jansen, 1085 South Brown Road - VARIANCE David Yorks, 2825 Casco Point Road - VARIANCE SESSION 7. #496 8. #500 William Pearce, 1405/1485 Sixth Avenue North - SUBDIVISION Timothy Petersen, 280 Orono Orchard Road - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE 9. #504 10. #507 Robert Van Tassel, 1170 Loma Linda Avenue - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Development Group, Inc., 3701 Shoreline Drive - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL OF MINUTES 11. Meeting of August 13, 1979 tLM^ /H f c ^ iiA ivt fa n ^ a ,-----1. /y 7-^ V11LLA€E0F01€)N0 « ft«i ...-^y- /";X-1 I * ■ *■ > »dy ® X"X ■>' ,-■ 1-T ' -<c^ i?*~\ i\ >-"'-sr* j"4 !i I ,4>^ >*r V \ i' * V ** ^ ^ t ' ; • • y(? m.:\-1.Jst5' V*'’ ICM.I «4MV ««W r I: « , V«*M 1 Mntt ^ • %%»% Cn-Y OK OkONO EXHIBIT 5 LAND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY VARIANCES REQUIRED Zoning Use District ^ DENSIXY W)W)KU>*. ¥VJJ\^XJi ACTUAL VAPJ Js>»CT rcPt SLCTICN Lot KMmm Lot wSdOi f-}j /A6 3(. . i/So Jt 16 SETBACKS Lli*ct friont) Side___________ flA« ____ k^inikuk urounirp oistjwc PPOPL’SO)VAPlAVCT coor srcTiQg JC 56 Bld9. to Bld9< La AC sltof • Veil end* 75 n, 76 PL. -X jt jg jt HARDCOVER LOT AMI*. JL*JL tJ-J---------- FtK*UTTI2> KXRDCOVIJI s.t._______ nXJSTlKC KAXDCOVT^ % _______ FROPOSOJ hxrdcovtia J6 5_J^.----------- TOTAL VXAIAXCE 5C P.f ,______JC CODE StCTJCB 31.S31 «tld O Ukc O Uk« 75 Lok« 250 Lok* 500 76 PL. O* 75 PL. ^ 750 500 PL. 30% lOOO PL. 35% 34.702 .« !>s, _iS_3j2-4 V ^2 _____■*' 5^- Xd 34. 34.702 34.702 OTHER SECTIONS yoaiP^CXISTIKC_________FPOPnSCD VXA I ANCr root SECTIW Oulldif^ ••i9ht rarkii>9 fltlA.) V «/ I // / . /s s • J uiii ur UKUNU LAND USE PLAI^NING ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY VARIANCES REQUIRED DENSITY Lot JLr •• Lot Width »nW)KUW VtTUIVZP I^CTUAL VI*|I J A vWCT is ' EXHIBIT 5 Zoning Use District rupt stcTiw JC % SETBACKS fttfvct Cffontl Side_________ Side Seer Bldg, to Bldg* 1^\9 nhorm Wetlend* HARDCOVER »tlKlKl)K I HTD EX JSTIWC p>*OPPOCD VARJ AMCX root srcTioB 7S rt. 76 Ft. LOT AJIEA J^X. •-•J ■______ wt-ld O - 76 Ft. 0% fLKKJTrrnD KAJinCOVXJt iJL__________1 EXISTIKC KAADCOVOl a_.fa _______ JC JC JC % lAke O - 7S Ft. CnC LAk« 75 - 250 Ft. 25% — Lok« 250 - 500 Ft. 30% _ 3 ^6 ^ PROPOSED HXRDCOVEB % e.f. TOTAL VXBLAJ4CZ % ».f.______CODE StCTK 31.831 >4.202 n T /f — ■— >4.202 ijiJie 500 - 1000 Ft. 35% >4.202 OTHER SECTIONS rtooi red E3CISTIKC PROPGSED Buildtng Beight (mjc. ) Forking (Kin.) VARIJkNCr CX30C SCCTIOW LAND DJVlSJOiit ^ Vs C.OV9V- CL^i plat unpl*tt*d d lol^ t JkC parcels per application ’ occupied _____ aea«« owncra>)lp _____ eeparate o^T^rrahipJLVA] lability I adjacent lota/parcela (• ) January 1, 1975 CWmerahlp tingle separate _____cor.blned with other parcels not In this application TOPOCRAFKY Includeti laVeahore _____wtlanda ______high ground ______ level ground ___ rolling hilla _____ steep alopcs _____ open areas wooded areas LECCRAPKY affecting applicationt unusual lot shape unusual hulldlng location lot alic/ahapei ronalatent _____ inconsiatent with neighborhood develo|e«icnt ACetSSi _____ new t/" existing city _____ eounty/atate _____ private irriLITlESt City sewer ___ _ available septic aysicsB _____ new _ _ _ _._ _ cxjn/.ected; City water available_ proposed existing cunfomlng_____cxistirtg substandard connected - exlatirrg non>confonalng LAND USE Subject lot is_____vacant . i/^ occupied DCISTINC LAND USE corrpared to toning use districlr FBOFQSAL affacte ____ principal ir accessory building or use conforming use conditional use r>on "Cvnfooiing use STRUCTURES DISTUK; BUILDINGS Deficicnciaa t _____ BB0F06AL TYFli ___ do rrot roaply with xoning performance standards entirely NTV building or use ^ reviaw ea NEW building or use (coat exceeds 50X FMV) review as E3CFANS1GM of cxiatirtg (cost lass than 50% FMV) ____ Existing buildir>g FAJB MANKET VALUE {yr) ______ f_________ FBOFQ6AL will will iK>t reduce an existing substandard yard diernslnn TAXES & ASSESSMENTS FBOfENTY ID. ______________________ Lota/Farcals enmad In coweon YA&ESi _____ are FAXD current are not legally ctaabtned for tax purposaa. are DELlNQUEMT Lo year Aaraaseanta Laviedi Sawar (rto)units Watar units ▼ i %*v«k TO: FROM: Planning Commission Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator #499 I * DATE:August 22, 1979 SUBJECT: #499 John S. Guthrie, 325 Sixth Avenue North - FINAL SUBDIVISION Ploase review the enclosed memo from the septic inspector. Parcel B harimpire^ee for an alternate system and the existin, system is satisfactory. _ _1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION FOR JOHN S. GUTHRIE ^ WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivisiSn Sgulaulns fL the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by John S. Guthrie, the subdivider: and City WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City Of Orono ^J^^trorSu^verby'^M^^^ Associates ^^^^rLgusf^r ?S7flE$hIbit^An%ubiLt t^ tL following conditions: The aforesaid division shall be filed with the Hennepin County sirfc;rtrfi^ro??g?Lr=°opy ^ The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if ^he plat has not f-„Tp'pifil?ir:!;h JL^^t^y^rSronS ^-^Sbdivision review. Dated this day of , 1979. William B. Van Nest, Mayor ATTEST: Walter R. Benson, Clerk/Administrator m • • * TO: FROM; DATE: #499 Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Septic System Inspector August 22, 1979 SUBJECT; #499 John Guthrie, 325 Sixth Avenue North - Septic System •i Mr. C.Thrie's existing septic system has been inspected and appears to be functioning correctly. Ample area for future expansion has been included on the lot. Septic system testing on Lot 2, Block 1, Holly Acres, which is in^-ended to be combined with Mr. Guthrie's remaining parcel, has been tested and approved for a standard septic system. Note that testing on this lot is generally at the crest of the ridge down the center of the lot, and any driveway constructed should skirt this area. 5'#499 I 9 # £X/^/6JT P tX O, O ' U TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission and Council Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator August 7, 1979 SUBJECT: #502 Conditional Use Pe^rmit - Ronald Christensen 3587 North Shore Drive A portion of the access change involves filling and the construction of a retaining wall. The following list is a summary of findings to be reviewed for the Conditional Use Permit: 1) Amount of fill - 376 cubic yards - 37 dump truck loads. 2) Proposed contours cited and to be reviewed by City Engineer. 3) Length of wall - approximately 50'. 4) Wall - concrete above proposed grade - 7-1/2' railing - 42" Plans are being reviewed by the MCWD and City Engineer. STAFF UPDATE - AUGUST 21, 1979 Please review the enclosed letter from the applicant's design firm discussing the drainage issue. The letter confirms points cited by the applicant at the previous meeting. 1. drainage directed towards County Road 51 2. garage floor elevation higher than center of County Road 51 drainage will flow towards highways drainage corridor 3. old parking area to be sodded, affprding absorption and alleviating some of the erosion of gravel road parallel to 51 I have discussed these points with our City Engineer and he concurs. His reviewing letter will be presented at the meeting. The LMCD has not been heard from to date. As requested, we have enclosed copies of the Minutes for a previous variance application. / .. » August 20, 1979 Mr. Ronald L. Christensen 3587 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 # /O) oft II d’lZ'ilo Itduli i'unl ■. .1/ i nc<‘i>'t .’i.'t ! Dear Mr. Christensen: poLivKa LDGan oesiGneRS The watershed is for the new driveway which is going to be directed toward County Road 51. This is possible since the garage floor is slightly elevated above the center of County Road 51 and that highway has a drainage corridor that will adjoin the new driveway. Watershed in old parking area will be an improvement since it is hard cover and will be replaced with black dirt and sod. This watershed will be an improvement and will reduce the constant erosion on the gravel easement road which parallels County Road 51. If you have any further questions in regard to the watershed please do not hesitate to call me. Rei^ecttully submitted^, PISlIVKA LOGAN JESDGNEI togan/ii. Johnson Presldtnt LWJ 'i'» tniirhnt* /.f * f . * »•'; »»* m- •'* ^ » ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 27, 1975 Page 12 Hr. Henry lluhich. Building & Zoning Administrator, st;ated that:VARI.ANCE 3587 North Shore Drive ft?Mr. Noll is requesting «pproval of a variance from our 75 ft. hardcover lakeshore setback requirement for a concrete patio and sidewalk which he has already installed. He has installed approximately 740 sq. ft. of concrete hardcover within the 75 ft. setback limits. On ilay 29, 1975, a representative from the D. F. Vizecky Consc.*'action Company made application this same pioject. He was denied the permit for the hardcover and informed that crushed rock or open wood hype v;alk and deck v/ould be permitted. He was also informed of the option and procedures for a request of a variance. Hr. Scheller reported the project partially completed. A violation tag was issued. Mr. Noll pleaded guilty in District Court on August 19,1975, conditional upon word from the Orono Village Council, Mr. Noll was then informed that the illegal hardcover would have to be removed. He requested an opportunity to make this application for a variance before removing the concrete walk and patio. Planning Commission Action - October 21, 1975 The Planning Commission recommended to the Council denial of the variance application of Richard Noll due to the 75 ft. hardcover setback 'equire- ment, because they felt added hardcover v. .s not the only solution to the drainage problem and because he had been made aware of the hardcover restrictions and variance procedures, been denied an application but proceeded with the work. Mayor Searles stated that the variance apnlication v/as after the fact and that there are other alternatives to solving drainage problems within ^5 ft. of the lake and that applying hardcover « was not a vicible solution. V'/elsh moved, Butler seconded, to deny variance to the 75 ft. hardcover setback. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Mir. Harry Johnson asked the City Council vrhy water runoff to Lake Minnetonka was such a vital issue. Mayor Seeurles replied that storm v;ater runoff is the greatest source of pollution to Lake Minnetonka and that the degree of nutrients determines how polluting storm water really is. i'iayor Searles continued to point out that the Harza Study, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (Continued) 0.OH0 COO-.CII. .®BTI«G HEBO OCTOBEK 27, 197S Studies,. .annesota E|Uut^f^^^^ itrn'S -"•,torm water and what xs q the r°ins«uct lir. Kichard Noll « remove iUeqal "“'::r-est iuu =o»pXl-ce with restoration of property. . - - Hays (0) •Motion, Ayes C4) - ^ “9 a-LSBsr.’;»~srK k;;“'~four feet from the sx existing |f,f*aris,for a 3°. -f.lf,’,,"„qe attached to -rdruinrwihH a hreereway r%nUrrio^lU^%|^Hl^re%frcr/aqfri I tills which includes a Urge pthree acres rk ^.o wetlands. north of r^oars to be adequate a resultingThere app^^^ proposed ^ ^ the residence . with existing adi front ^oreriSrng rtTc'toher 21, 3975 Planning Commission ^^led the Kermit Eisinger ,he Plen-Ji-'^"“Sltr^aiferntte plan could be application so tha presented. ' . „eish seconded, that the request^of Butler move , Vjildhurst Trai- , '^fiback^trUnce bo approved s^7|<= „„ction.setbacK va garage prior tu removal ^4) - pays (0).Motion, Ayes \ variance . g Drivr 3587 North Shore (Continued) I f \ / V. . • ~ ■ i VARIA1'^*“^40 smith Avenue Trail notion, Aye« ^„tanCE nuhich. Building s Zoning Administrator. p^.^nwood Road '^ItefSat Xt^han been determne^^^^^^ requirements (Continued) variance . -e Drivf 3587 North Shot (Continued) A^Smith Avenue ler P.O. fcoH 66, Crystal Bay, Kirmeaoca 35323 473-7357 Xv IWSTIIUCTIOHS: ^ 2 6. > 8. dr*crlbc your rrquett. Incooiplttf •ppllcitton* win not be occrptcd. f PROPERTY ADDRESS /oSS"- So-(^f^ocjAJ UA/t«TA Legal deecrlptloo ehell be shown on sttsched Survey, E*Mblt 3 APPLICANT lu^pf-ULie M-7/iUS€.A/ Phon, ^73^3C? Milling Address /O 7^S’-S 0 - Gdoi** fij) /i/ If Applicant la not owner, explain OWNER Nine A1 ■ .'p9A/5g.y Phone V7J ’ Y Mailing Address / O 6o At/A/4f SS-^V Date Pro perty Acquired_____________________(Honch/tesr) I (do) (j3o not) also ovm other adjacent parcels of land AGENT ------------------------- Firs Me'ling Address NOTICES Should be sent to:Applicant CX#ner Agent PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT PRESENT USE Hesldentlal _i^::r^(Other) _____________ LIST OF EXHIBITS £ Deacrlptlon Initial Application ouat include: 1 Application For* 2 Property Oumera Llat 3 Certificate of Survey \/ Fee Receipt Date Received jp ^ ^ ®y !^ir_^LJ^VVw . Staff Infomatlo n 4 ^ Plat Map 5 y/ Inventory b s/ Staff Consenta Other Inform ation Vacant Land Vacant Building(a)Occupied Building(a) DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ ^ODc. _ eatabllah new uae continue or expand exiatlng uae Describe request in detail: fn — build oci# ^^t^add on __ reaodcl __ replaca <1, / /I I-^jyStA^ CCi>ss^ Lot AreaVARIANCE(S) REQUIRED to do the requeated Vorb: ___ Sida Rear) Other U' Lot Width Hardeewer Setback (front 10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS p^r^'enting compliance with zoning Code requireaenta: <> VARIANCE 865 Partenwood Roaa jbdivision (Continued) Describe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY resulting fro. strict enforce«nt of ro„ln. /•TVv 32. Describe EFFEITT OF PROPOSED WORK on neighboring properties and oo the neighborhood In scnersl- a - n/1 . , _ s • yyi^££j^-m y ^ (?. Tha APPLICANT and the PROPEIRTY OWNER must sign and date this applicatif>n. *: infor^stlon Jh. ama h.r,by ochnowl.dg« and sgr.ss to this .ppllesti, supplisd Is true snd correct to the best of his knowledge: werlflcstloo of this re<)uesc: Applicant's Signature Date Owner's/ Signature Date f i Am.TCATTnN nFADTJNE TEN HO) DAYS BEFORE PTANNING CO^IMTSSTON )-n=:ETTNG ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO P.O. Bo« 66, Cryital Hlnnrtota JS323 473-7357 ' n»»ded, attach letter or other Infonnatlon to better de.erlb. your requeat. Incomplete appllcattona vlll not be accepted' PROPERTY ADDRESS /o^S'- So fiO, UaYX-9Ta Legal dcaerlptloo ahall be ahown on attached Survey, Exhibit 3 APPLICANT M-7/iUS€.A/ Phone W73^3(.? Mailing Addreaa /O ^S’~So ~ ,4/f/^V If Applicant la not owner, explain OWNER Ka-e f^'rLjp Phone V73?3C^_______________ Mailing Addreaa / 4? 6o Ai/A/Ar S Date Pr^erty Acquired ____________________ (Month/Year) I (do) (Tdo not! also own other adjacent parcels of land AGENT ____________________________________________________ Firs Mailing Addreaa NOTICES Should be aent to:Applicant Agent • 7. PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT /Ca,j/g« PRESENT USE «ealdenttal [Other) __________________ LIST OF EXHIBITS £ Peacrlptlon Initial Application nxiat Include: 1 Application Torm 2 Property Ownera Liat 3 Certificate of Survey Fee Receipt # Date Received jP ^ ^ Staff Infonnatlon 4 _J_ Plat Map 5 yj Inventory S Staff Comaentg Other Infonnatlon 7 Vacent Land Vacant Bulldlng(a)Occ\ipled BulldLng(a) DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMA'iZD CONSTRUCTION COST $ ^OPo. — ••teblleh new uae_ ^ continue or expand existing use Describe request in detail: — build new J^edd on __ rew>del __ repUce Hs CCi>, Lot AreaVARIANCE (S) REQUIRED to do the requested Work: Side Rear) Other Lot Width Hardcover Setback (Front 10. D6SCiribG UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS preventing cotapllance teith Zoning Code tequirements: L/ Describe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY re.uitmg fro. .tnet enforcement of conin, r.gul.tlona _ ^2. Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK on neighboring propertlee and on the neighborhood In general: lA The APPLICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER must The AFPLICANT hereby agrees to provide ell inforMtion required or requeared hy the Zoning Adnlnlatrator, egreea P*F all fees and/or unusunl cupentea incurred in review of this eppllceclon, and certifies that the information supplied la true end correct to the beat of his knowledge: sign and date this application. The eVKER hereby acknoa#ledgoo end egreee to this epplicetii end further authorlaea reaaosMble entry emto the property by City staff, consultanto, agenca, coaalsalon membera^ and Cotar^cll menbera for purpoaea of inveatlgation and verification of this request: ________1 9 Applicant's^/Signature Date ^iL^d • d.//Owner's/'Signature Date f APPIJCATTON DFADLTNE TEN (10) DAYS BEFORE PTjANNTNG COMMISSION ITEETING IIBIT 1 LIST OF EXHIBITS £ Detcrlption Initial Application Buat include: 1 Application For* 2 Property Owners List 3 Certificate of Survey \/ Fee Rrcelpc Date Received jp ^ ^ Staff In forget ion ^ 4^ Plat Map 5 y/ Inventory 6 ^ Staff Consents Other Information :OST $ ^ODo. OO __ revodel __ repLaee St Width Hardcover ling Code lequlrcBients 5 GOVgpuiigl^^ -»'«E*POU^ M. £F- f'EE OWNER ^AX PAYER/ -^i^iyNG^AOOREss mcikkcp,w . xnowLjpee oo "-.we 6,v,„oh c;? 0*Tg^V/Z.^7 PfiOPERTV address I «SOo« L» ^ A ^ / ,?v U « ££c^C, / y» ®* •trie* cnfoTcaBcnt of tonlog P neighborhood in gcnerel: 8 application. \mm end agroos to this applicott< tonable entry onto the property , ogcats, cooBission Bcobers^ rposes of Investigation end It: t^AlnllX ; Date f mI “_j*i COM?-fT SS TON T-HvETTNG H I« H r L TW>nc: 43J#b05 ARLEIGH C. SMITH? Rcpjtcml FrcftMonAl En^nccr inJ Larul Survc^oc 2030 Wijr»ta Boalcvinl avuti, MinncjoA M.C. CO€^ JZ\ ' :..i : ' j 5 " ' GOO-LOT 6 PLAT OF SUEVrr ' ‘ * ‘ —3— or PROPERTY or_PHlLL|P M. JAMSFf>^_____iO^S^ R^ dctcribed u followi:_CornmfcnC.i nj 7.7^ rhain^ .Souih oT “t. Kg N ,Cj C^r HT fia/t. L^LtQ^-IcujfLa Kip l\T,RAny ther^cc_2/i2Lu<10J&iel^t&%cc South ///. 54 fleet V ^/y onTeW. -ihpnce. Noi-lk 111.54 ^et o' be^lrknn^q. /V' Scale. I inch __5M ____TmL q\\ I !? in Q 219 CO fiCi^ re^ci^s PirO|A4«/A'«'101 J2 I H lOLt*— — _ _ — n9 tr ^ e- ^ >e N' 2-5-r ;;rV in — T ® 31 X*iOt.4— _ — — — — ~ a or Oo 279.00 Denotes iron monument. CCRTinCATE or LOCATION or BUlLDmC 1 hereby certify that nn NA a R lia nTG J made a survey of the proposed locstJOA of the buildiog on the above described property mod that the location of said buildiAf u correctly shown on the ab^^ plaL czjiTzncAix or %vnvmr 1 hereby certify that on h^A.R» \ Co lo | surveyed the properly described above and that the above plat u a correct representation of said surve>. jj- (3*.^^I22 I r^‘ >1 ,N .v^ I £ H SETBACKS (r>ont| JprjlTJNC sia« 1 ll xt> BJdy. I^VesKor*7i rt.. l'•«t 3 ftnds 26 rt.. Ihardcover *-OT AJUIX -^^iUL •.f.KARDCOVIJI a.f. EXHIBIT 5 Use District CODE SimOM Kwcr rroCSJlCTJOi ___ _____% Tt>TAi VAJilAKCE %.t.£9P t stcTic» 31.831 34.302 34.202 34.202 34.202 ^IJWCt SECTTOI ■hip —OwT»e/«hlp PTc.l. not In ,hi, .ppiic.tlon -------rollLr>9 Mil* \ 1 connect*^ - "on-eonfonilng r>on-cx>nfomln^ J fst.f/) 2.' reviewed BV: Cuuncll M..-,* i«^ctin9 Attorney «ty Engi„,„ Pl.nn,, Ad-inl.tr.tor ^•nning Con«,l,„„„ ’’■tA Coa»Bl,,ion — s...„ '•in.nc. Director —- *'Ptlc inspector “••••’ ■— •4te«) ---- ii SPECIAL comments I~ SWFF recommendation -ppiiction.. ^PPPOVD .ppliction ^ -PPliction ,oc ^ ^"-ition. ““V -PPitetion ,or r **“"• *“t.d ebov. APPT.TC a TM;n ...----- 1 - "'""'Pin Cty. ooT - «inn. St.t* dot ‘ ^nn. DNu HCUD LMC3» *^rr RECOMMENWnoNS *«<=CESTED Fjndincs z 1. 2. J ...................... • «>e or.n»4- . “'• *PPllc^^ • "*ce...rv .. ^ 7>.. -pp,y gener.jjV;-;-''" »re „ot pecuH- /p„.. , of th* PP^l<^«nt. "*'e»»«ry - —“:ef;r- --.nc. ^ ............. - , ^ ».. ^ **e Publi. S. - -^ -- co„... “» •ll'viir. dlj*''*’ ’'•«-i»nce will * Of u>« Co«pr„ -;.ly ..rv. .. . __ ‘-"O «•• 6. y ^ning Code. -fiance wouj^j . — r* Of «>• inten *o •ll»viat« a. ** ’'•«-l»nce win b.,drM^•—... — »• .ppilcnt h.. d._ "•"''-ni.nc, to th. ’'•'l.ne. would no * ‘PPUcnt. but 1. ..............................“"Srii" ~ , '""*• Page 2 A. X U “"•• ‘" *>•• -i.trid the dl.trict In *t> tor the •"JOyment of « *’**1V>. ..f.ty. preservation ^"»P«ir the ---nealth. comfort. ‘^°"'ort. „o,„, "t ot the COn.p,eh,„^j Intent of "" the ''c l«»nd Dae ^'"PtO-n.lv. ’•nience to the •PPllc.nt. but i. ‘•^ity end i^e ^cceaaary therefore St.ntlny o, m fi —--------— ------- --------- **r j*/J57 * • iiiVnt: u;!“")'«>- te,ue.t. Ine^,.., property address Z3Z^ -n, *.1 -..criptioo .hen WAyrffrft, /!d€L_^, APPI TrAM-r ^Iblt 3 Addreaa ^ --- Phone ^2A It Applicant la not owner, explain LIST OF EXHIBITS “ Pcacrlptlon Initial Appllcatffm ®uat IncludeT ' ^ .i^^^Appl 1 cat ion Tona —__ Property CXniera Llat Jl^^^Certlficate of Survey Tee Receipt # pQOC OWNER jaj.v>,o.| Phone Mailing Addreaa Date Property Acquired T f n*^ Received ■P ^-d . IK f f In forma t j on * JC Pl.t M.p (do not) also ovS^heFlajlSiST .."Triro, land Hicur .^;pvr. Mailing Addreaa NOTICES Should be aent to: Applicant JK^Ovni Asent PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT _ SEg//,^. rr/.^, -*^- (Other) ___________7. PRESENT USE He.ldentui Vacant Land Occupied BulldlngCa)___ Vacant Buildlng(a) ______ DESCRIBE REQUEST ^ - ““ “• instruction tost ^ _ • * __ build new ^ Descrxbe request In detail: y ~ ........................................................................... ^ 9. VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED .. e, .s, i_y r™. ^iu,___,u,r) oth.,_______________________ 10. Des^cribe ^USUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS ... ^ “• ^XUSHIP or PRACTICAL DI-^FI^-ul TY ....ue.. ------------------- regulatlona ^ «^forceB»eni of aoning ^^®^PPLICANT and the PROPFptv rwTXTfn applicant hereby .gree. L Tt^d iTX ^^^ER DlUSt to pey .11 faH .nd/or Jn^lf^*:*^*^?*'*'*****^. -Are., of thl. appiieatlon. .nd eertlfn^W tlTT;*' ^ -PPHed 1. true .nd correct .Tt'lle^^it*:? M.^-CTo^le^-dge: /I. r i J /1. ( ( fi / I_________ if Applicant's/Signature ~ Date by Ctry .t.ff, con.ult.nt!^ *' P">P*rty and Council mrTT#i ■ « * B^ta, comlaalon leeabera ‘—‘-MO. ..o’- / /•-'- 77 / --—^ >______b j-'' 7 7 Owner's Signature Date ||||M^M^^^^.^NNINC cn..e.ne„.„ ............... o and LIST OF EXHIBITS “ j>^»cr!ptlon Initial Application Include: ^ Icat Ion Fona ^ ----- Froperry Oniera Lilt ^ Icate of Survey _ Fee Receipt # f'QOC I^te Received Staff Information * J^^PUt Hap ^ Inventory ^ Staff CooBaenCa " COST $jg, oo ; J^^^d on ^ /v, rraodri __ repUe* . Lot Width Hardcover Zoning Code t equl r ewnta: fro» atrlet enforconmt of lonlng i '• “«‘*>*o«-hood In Ls application. !««• and to thU oppltcatl. aaaable entry onto Che property . ogenta, coiaalaalon nepers «l>o»ea of Inveaclgatlofi end * at: — ^ /-r v/ J Date t s s ton vvftt Mr 60S 60VERHMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN $5487 LIST Size l\ FEE OWNER tax payer / Riling address •fNO BELiee^ KNOWLEOCe iCNNCPIN CO. FINANCE DIVISION ------------ ^ 7'f «V ^ f- ///. /r>t,/I / f~C^s,ce 7^^^ ;:Q- ^—I--------S'3 «7 / property address /n,c4a,/ r Firrrll^,..: M. /3. Strciw TT yj 'I' 2j2-t ^5'/7 I« Pi 3~ ij.r lyt^ • I -a ; * ^0, 7 1. s-y mmm c. 1 --•rv.7 • 117, Eorii't. /’ari r'.i:n- n5r Cwntj , Klni.. oct^ ^®-Ve(c«vey' A o.Uo Y. r; 5 r1 1 fi C-. 1 « , f Lurv.-v; I hpr-by r^-rfl'y thr,’ ♦.hlf If •> truo f.r«-' rrrrrct r«pr-. r'Tti.tfrr, < r a r jrv. v < l-e t<i;rv,riv: cf Ul U7, V;. r:. to a , fim:Tit p'.rl cf th<. teem said v«c.t.w! nvtr.,.o ^nc tM- rKcrr. cf L«^e .Vlnn- trnk... •"•/‘f t:.c lin.r of 13'’ tc t» < .v^re r ,;:e -i^nr.-trt/,. . ,x.d of tho Ir-.*! -r, o'* .<11 h:l]-.i:,p- th-rerr, •in ill *. l'>ii,l.-. rr.rrc -.o.Tr. rlr. *'rr- or on .eld I5 nt>. finrc the orlcini.1 rxtir Tr/"^ '” J'-r'Tf,''''-- "■ ''••■^ b.-u-„l.-.rl,.r urrr, rrrvlcurl:--.xiMlnr rm„. r«ntetlcn of thr. Jet. Seale: 1" = Itatc ; 9-19 • Iron marker foundoi Iron cnricer ret /"r.j 4^ke| <linnercl£ N r L r -i ■'r. ; ^7 mi mm Ipl p9 Jse District ^ CUDl StCTlON PREPARED FOR; BY: STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS Pl«r«nin9 CunsnlBsiun Heeling (Dele) Council Ht-cllng (Dele) (Sleff) ____________________ (Staff) ____________________ 4. APPLICATION REVIEWED BY: Jk>»C3:root ^TCTicm ____ City Administrator a , City Attorney ____ City Z^tginrcr ____ Village Pla \j»er Zoning Administrator Planning Coiwaiasion ____ ParX CofW»*asion Public WorXa Coordinator Public Safety Director rinance Director Building Inspector Septic Inspector Hennepin Cty, DOT Kinn. State DOT Hinn. DNA 'OS ED xrovxA TOTAL VAKIAHCZ JC a.f. SPECIAL COMMENTS ^ CODE StCTIC 31.831 / yFy JA/ ^ VXRIMICt 3A.302 34.303 34.303 34.303 34.201. Lakeshore Set Back Regulations. The set back from the shoreline for lakeshore lots shall be at least 75 feet and no building may be located closer to the shoreline than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent and nearby lots. CODE SrCTICTI _nj /, X3Le. A, < 'LjUULia- /% .a.tk^^LZ*n_ / ownership __1^^aeparsf ownership Other parcels not In this application rround rolling hills conncctad andard __ anistir^g ru>n-conforising itional use non-confooslng uaa STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVE application aa aubnittad APPROVE application subject to following conditions TABLE application lor additional infoi~*aation DEKY application lor raaaona noted above aa >9 V* m A* A V ^J» 17, /iff • U’j'f^ itor Hennepin Cty. DOT Kinn. Stet* DOT Minn. DNH The set back 11 be at least oser to the the shoreline nt and. nearby /h^trlCGL ?! w SUGGESTED FINDINGS 7/ t ^ ■ ; i‘ ' Itr ((i^ 1. 5. 6. The epeclal conditiont «pplyin9 to the etructure or lend in queeliun are pi«culiar to euch property or irr^nediately eurroundinq property and do not apply qenerally to other land or atrocture. In the diatrici in which aaid land is located; OP TUm conditions sppiylnq to the structure or lend In question sre not pcculisr to such " . inmediately surrounding property but do spply generally to other land or atructures n e ■ Which aaid land ia located. The qrsnting of the spplicstlon iX is_ _ _is not necesssry for the preservation and enjoyisent of • aubstantial property right of the applicant. The granting of the propoaed variance will not in any way Impair the public health, safety, comfort, morals or general welfare: OR The granting of the propoaed variance may impair the public health, safety, comfort, rrorals or general welfare. The granting of the proposed variance will not b« contrary to the intent of the Conptehensive band Os. Plan or the Zoning Code; OR Iha granting of the propoaed variance would be contrary to the Intent of the Comprehensive Land Oa. Plan or the Zoning Code. The granting of such variance will not n«rcly serve as a convenience to the applicant, but ia necessary to alleviate demonstrated hardships or difficulties; OR The applicant has d.r^n.trat.d no recognized hard.hlp or difficulty and therefor, the granting of auch vsrianca would merely serve as a convenience to auch applicant. ^ ^ ^ y r/a Tta^ 1 ^^ I rt |< /—At<X aJU SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TELEPHONE CONrERENCE RECORD FILE NO TITLE V-^'VI'k —LxC-/^ tX-^ jt pt* ^'-^' i^;. ir ‘■' ■ / / ' » ^ V - f \» •' C. a.g-a.i di..^ prC7. tti) J August 21, 1979 5 OQ Mr. David J. Yorks 2825 Casco Point Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Patty & David; I tnderstand from reviewing your heme remodeling drawings last night that the Omo Village requires our approval of your project. Therefore, based upon the drawings I reviewed, we approve of your project. Very truly yours, Mr. & Mrs. Paul J. Maupin 2820 Casco Point Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 July 17, 1979 William R. Pearce 1405/1485 Sixth Avenue North SUBDIVISION Page 2 n ^ b) The granting of the request will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which said property is situated; and c) The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner. Please note the following findings of fact. 1. A residential structure does not lie within subject property. 2. The proposed subdivision does involve a private roadway serving three residential lots. STAFF NOTE - AUGUST 21, 1979 Issue of Metes and Bounds vs Platting of the subdivision Staff Recommendation - After meeting wxth the applicant and reviewing the issues and unique background of the subject property, staff recomniends a metes and bounds division for the Pearce subdivision based on the following findings: Access 1ssue 1 The existing private driveway will serve no more than the three i^rcels ihe ?ls?rictive covenants filed with this P^oP^^ty limits ^h^nu^ber of residences to three. Document No. 558151 has been added to the files for your review. 2 The applicant could construct another^ approach serving the two n4wly created parcels. We recommend against this because of the topography and unnecessary additional costs incurred. j li i July 17, 1979 William R. Pearce 1405/1485 Sixth Avenue North SUBDIVISION Page 3 # A K STAFF^NOTE - AUGUST 21, 1979 (CONT.) Residential Structure Issue 1. The requirement of a residential structure is a "leftover" from a predominantly farming community to assist the farmer in transferring lands to offsprings. The City has approved metes and bounds divisions before in the absence of residential structures. Staff will schedule a Public Information Meeting as soon as the septic test results are received and reviewed. • •( / ' • i \ *‘ ]' ■■ !,■ •!u Lavques Tower Conpany 9300 Park Avenue South Minneapolis, ITN 55420 August 14, 1979 Village of Orono Planning Commission In re:Timothy J. Petersen at 280 Orono Orchard Road Conditional Use Permit and Variance Please be advised that Lavques Tower Company has been retained by Timothy J. Petersen to act as a consultant in the engineering and erection of Peterson's proposed communication system. It is the professional opinion of Lavques Tower Company that the conditional use permit and variance requests are of a minimum nature. The requests if not granted could be injurious to Petersen. Lavques and Petersen have spent large sums of money and time to perfect the proposed system, which comports to the highest of safety standards and professional i ..•.ftroanship. Your careful and immediate cons^'eration of the proposed communication system is sincerely solicited and the anticipa tion of the applied for conditional use permit and variance is hoped to be forthcoming. av x-n Lavques Tower Company Martin Lavques, President TJP:nc -2- REFERENCES Lav^uos Tower Corpfjry hir b"cn in H;ninccs in the IVirh.’cnt Area 'or a period over ?3 Yearn s'^rvino the eorritinications industry. A rcnresor.tatlVO list o' aro stated as follows: Im Gcnrral Ccm:ni-?^tiono Conp^ny lit. Loui.'^ i'^rlr, rinnosota 2, K ?C P Connunic.ition Cor.p'ir.y I!ir.nr‘-‘nolir Tinnesota 2, Donner P C A Conivunicationr Go. l!innc.Hpolir> l!inncnota 4. AirCor. Con^.v^nl rati one Cor.pfir.y Zo'eClilr, V/isconr.in f:, !:o.nncpin County , Hor.nopin County novernnont Center, rir.nc*aDol is KK, G. Ct. Police Drpirtr.cnt ^t. Paul, I'.innesota MAPTIK LIVAKP. . .President TO; FROM; DATE; Planning Commission and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator August 20, 1979 SUBJECT; #504 Conditional Use Permit & Variance Robert Van Tassel, 1170 Loma Linda Avenue The Van Tassels propose redesigning the roof of their boat house, from a peak design to a flat roof with a sitting area. The new roof will afford a better view of the lake for neighbors as well as the applicant. The building was inspected and found to be in excellent condition. The proposed change will not effect the hardcover calculation. The structure is located within the 75' lakeshore setback and is recognized as a legal non-conforming use. Ordinance prohibits the extension or intensification of non-conforming uses. 31.108 Normal maintenance of a building or other structure containing or related to a lawful non-conforming use is permitted, including necessary non-structural repairs and incidental alterations which do not extend or intensify the non-conforming use. (Ord. 172, 12-19-74, effective 1-1-75) Please review the following ordinances: 32.210 When Required A zoning ordinance occupancy certificate shall be required for occupancy and use of any buildings hereinafter erected or structurally altered; for new occupancy and use of an existing building when the new use is of a different zoning classification; for occupancy and use of vacant land, new use of vacant land when new use is of a different zoning classification; for any change in the use of a non-conforming use. Where appropriate, the zoning occupancy certificate may be issued as part of building permit. 32.410 Conditional Uses; Purpose In order to give the district use regulation the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of the Zoning Code, in certain districts, conditional uses are permitted, subject to the granting of a use permit. Conditional uses include those uses generally not suitable in a V^^ticular zoning district, but which may under some circumstances be suitable. When such circumstances exist, a conditional use permit may be granted. Conditions may be applied to issuance of the permit and a periodic review of the permit may be required. The permit shall issued for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. Because of their unusual characteristics, conditional uses require consideration so they may be located properly with respect to the objectives of the Zoning Code and with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. In order to achieve these purposes, the City Council is empowered to grant and to deny applications for conditional use permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting of these permits. August 20, 1979 Robert Van Tassel 1170 Loma Linda Avenue Conditional Use Permit & Variance Page 2 #504r Why a Conditional Use Permit? 1. Alert property owner (present and future) of the limitation on this structure. 2. To recognize the change in use for the records. Planning Commission to set limitation on new use (no future expansion, no additional hardcover, etc. etc.). 3. Nature of reguest too sensitive for staff determination — requires Council review. The variance portion of the application, dealing with the request to construct an 8' X 29.9 deck at the lakefront side of cabin, is reviewed under the normal variance procedure - see enclosed. i OSR rty)■-“ •* *• ■*-* WX LJO 1 ------ Subdivision $150+$10. __x_ Conditional Use ^ illa-»Jienne£jn^^ Tel #938-4439 Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($65) Tel # Same Present Use FEE^3 0.06 7^-7 9<g^ ®y ^ _________ ng to Request Ls&ElWTn =®'”® »e request to remove the prp.»nt roof ^ anee the lakeview from our cottage and neiqhbortno nconformity^ ck Front Side explain Rear 4cU:4. idential Other, explain t ------- —_____ No. of Lots xn proposed use of property in detail gIL££tH9i:_Jje_boathouse Is in good repair placement. We would prefer to use this ar.;. as a 'ARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION r to Planning Commission meeting) 5. Certified Property Owner's list of, rty °^ers within (300') (150')- from ' f A financea-b03 Government Center i * pre-Sre^*^^H^ on the a^vriist!°"” :^'s Signature 'ignature _ ^ in “r Me epptteatton \ * / / 5/78 type of request - - Subdivision $1504$lO 0 //^JL_ Conditional Use '^■So.oo __ Rozoning $250 __ Riprap $15 ($65) ate^Rec'd ? remove the Present hi oh L roof which may be used ir cottage and neighboring _ Rear t explain No. of Lots roperty in detail >6 1$ in good repair Gr to use this area as a ^with a flat mnf to water. ~ --------— ligation sion meeting) Property Owner's list of hin (3^-) (150*)- from 3. Dept, of Finance rnment Center sgal sized envelopes(#10 sed to each of the names 'e list. uired or requested by ; Planning Commission further agrees to pay (fypr or Print) |f^ *«t«chKl lnfcittjtio„ Sli».r r = =.^ ‘^'•crn., “'•ch 1„,„ „ cV.er^?’"' ” VITOUm^daB oe.crlptloo .hjll beTTT—------------—------------------ applicant k R K S-r.,,, ------------------ Oionr _ 938-4430 ^-ning Addro.. ,4728 East Cov enl^^ Appllc.nt 1. not ow„„. ^ OWNER Kaoe Same rhtrne Mailing Addrrat ^^meAOdrett Acq^Ti^^ 1 \dOJ ^ dn __ LIST OF EXHIBITS - ikacrlptlon — - *-iL-l£alJjra 11 on Ipelude: ------ application Tor™ Propcrt7 f^cr* Llat * ->/ Certificate of Survey ----- Pee Receipt # _______ Date Received 8y ___________________________ - — f (-.lafgrrjclon T /j \ X, ■' "'-S'JArea 1974 ----------------- (do) (do not) also ---------(Month/ye.r) agent ’'•»« J3cent parcels of landi _______ Phnn m y7 K«p Inventory CotriDent® rira Mailing Addreas nj^c rra 11 on Applicant Agent 5. NOTICES Should be aent to: 6. PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT 7. PRESENT USE R«,dentui- - (other) Summer coti-;>r^o Vacant Und- - -- Vacant Bulldlng(e) o. 8. describe REQUEST »unding(.)----- - instruction cost ? 1.000, Describe requeue in detetl: Wl^r^entJ^ave a ZT‘Z ~ Trent of the cottage. Ue re,eein^^I^7~~i ^^^^^.adla^creeneln;^^ free the VARIANCE(S) required .. e,X xiiaLl to do the requested Work: •"V’ ■ (_i^^Front k/^ side 5*106 and front U>t Area Lot Width Other Hardcover in n ana front ...... ............................________________ >0 fee “• ____________________ enable to have an outside seatinn !! ‘ •< IMwariaiiTTTTrTir::------------------°n the front of the cottage if '■ J!!lJr°Poaelde^„ enhance the beauty of the cottaoTl''a °” - «'■— tT7;;r7;7~::;7r^^ to ou r beino I’e^APPLICANT and the PROPERTY mum----------------"fighborinp cottages. 'U into^fion ^ ®ign ond date this T^~ ‘O pay all fee, and/or inuauaf“l * ‘**=‘"‘*trator. hereby .chnovl ^PPllCation.=.r:::= =HS£r \ / Applicant's Signature ^ ~Date y’ / 5/78 t-AHlBlT 1 ?504 LIST OF EXHIBITS - tUiLAer > <c«t i on Ijiclude; Appllciitfon Vorm Trcptrty (Vnrrt Llit of Survey -----Receipt # ^te Rf'celved ®y f land] — —t Ion ^ Hat Map ^ Inventory ------ Staff Cotanjcnt* —nfors^r Ion Dlf lA|L^f ^ Milled nON COST $J^ooo. nrw X add ^ ’ ' ~ «>" _ reood.1 ^ r.pUe. In porrh j_a i foot wooden deck from Lot Width Hardcover "«"»...... ne front of the cottage if ’ -‘«>>borhood In tiy add to our beina any neighboriTTg cotti^ his application. purj«.„ l„v„M*.eion 4/=r property owners list Tiszcl OWNB!^ NAME /j4 . /<y/4^U4ic e /« / ;=5A KfR address DESCRIPTION ^t^07=> AD[>R ,fz I ,a-r I PI I I c-^a / ^J}^AMjuf6-y ch P3S LOt>/\A ^/a»i>A AV£ ___6S2.<S4 //7-7 .1 " •HT 3/^0 S’ _j:Hfe^s S54-IC 4‘T3 “7 A^i<3»^ A»*r X. ----------------€-^4/0 //3o ^aia UA/t>A ^Ui 8- //7-Z3>-7^-^ PARCEL /I •Z c? /^*?8 Uaj^j^ A\j^ noi<\ T upa^ pfeV ___SS43 5 I« 11^0 Lt^o A- /fP g^ ~2.<e \Z, n C o 477? Coi/t>n-hrf /^t^j /I-7 p A ^f-^_43 f J /»-7 ‘p //jfo L om^ L*AA:i/i- I I f tI/ e/u / U^k:It ~ |7.e»8r «« ^“//7--2-3> - 37 >4T^e V, ■3/»* U,«St>r^ n&a A/. a/uT^2 .^ ' :Z-//7-7-a., /4^ 4* /Hoc'yi-'O /4 c-z. y< ^ue^B cr farc£i_ i the ti -tn* i-4-^ ^etilV At - AyCl .in 3!Mj tf .* r 'pre e tw * -i_i d___ 'o oMa of the Menn Co. f.n e btil^nr^ » now t and b#’|f‘f. Hfon- C-j flmr.ic D».m>n Plat of Survey for Dr. Robert A. Van Tassel of Lot 1C, l/?i;ti Linda Hemiepin County, Minnesota •• •' ; — ^ I . I C 0 Ni o4 5e f ?»74 « s Or \ ^ hfotUo0Pmi/ park$n^ art a J * y ’• •' C-? ?30. aa Pv./.<,W Cnc>-«.,A«J- /3 'y„7S. Certificate of Survey: I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 16, Loraa Linda, and the loca tion of all exlstinc bvdlaincs thereon, a rock wall, a wood fence, end a blacktopp^-d parkin, urea. It does not purport to chow other ircprovenentn or enrroachnentf.. Scale: Date : * .* •• •* 1" = 40* 6-21-77 Iron darker Cordon H. Coffin Land Surveyor and Lonf' Lake, Illnnesota Nc. 6064 ; ! ** . u • •• % • • •»•• •• k— / \i- ,J A. ^ SETBACKS KJJKTIKUK PUl^UIRID EDTISTIWC I'KOPOSCD VAvRiAJJCT Elr.ct (fiont) SM. P —U' _V'3 '-7 ^ . . % ------------------------------------------------- V % SSd« ------- ____2 BSdg. Bla^.------- -___ L*Ve ahor*75 rt.__2 ' _/3 " ---- ------? Wet 3 Anda 7fc rt. __—f — HARDCOVER U7T AJl£A |i.f. »*ER.‘U77ED HARDCOVTLR ».f. DriSTLKC KAivJX:o\'TDt «,f. PROroSED HAXDCOVTJl X ■ - f - X TOT AX VXA lAKCC Wtid o - 36 rt.OX X ». f . ISin; %jr UAUiMU Page 2 SUGGESTED FINDINGS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. LAND USE PLANNING STAFF COMMEN ’rS & RECOMMENDATIONS ^ ^ - fyeft-t-aJ /Th« spccl*! conditions applying U) the structure or lend in question sre peculiar to such property or IfffVksdSstsly surrounding property snd do not apply generally to other land or structures In the district in which said land is located: OH The conditions applying to the structure or land in question are rK>t peculiar to such property or invnediatcly surrounding pro^rty but do apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land la located. The granting of the application ___ is _ _ substsntisl property right of the spplicant. is not nrrcs&ary for the preservation and enjoy^^nt of a The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair the public health* safety, comfort, morals or general welfare; OR The granting of the proposed variance may impair the public health, safety, comfort, morals or general welfara. The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan or the Zoning Code; OR The granting of the proposed variance would be contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan or the Zoning Code. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrated hardships or difficulties; OR The applicant has demonstrated no recognised hardship or difficulty and therefore the granting of such variance would merely serve as a convenience to such applicant. 6. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. 2. 3. 4. S. i. REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 29, 1978 Page 6 Staff Note - June 6, 1978 Meeting held on the site to view the proposed trail. Present were the following people: Commission members McDonald, Hurr, and Hanmorel, staff members Gerhardson, Jim Olson, and Alan Olson and Park Reserve lepresentatives Tin Marr and Alex Mayer. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Morris T. Baker Park (Continued) * /\ I { r"> L.T i' -J7- Planning Commission Meeting - June 12, 1978 Recommended approval of conditional use permit for wetlands variance proposed as design is not detrimental to the marsh. Staff notes Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit on file and Department of Natural Resources application pending. Staff recommends approval subject to receipt of DNR permit before construction and to notice of construction to allow for City inspection of work in progress. Council Meeting - June 29, 1978 Butler moved, Pesek seconded, to approve the variance and conditional use permit request of Hennepin County Park Reserve for Morris T. Baker Park, per the Planning Commission recommendations of June 6, 1978, due to public interest of this property and subject to the DNR and Watershed approval. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Phillip Rusciano, 2340 Watertown Road, wuj not present. Item #5 was deferred iintil later in the evening. SUBDIVISION 2340 Watertown Road Butler moved. Mayor Van Nest seconded, to adopt Resolution #914, A Resolution Approving A Variance For Jack Safar And George Johnson, 925 Partenwood Road. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). RESOLUTION #914 925 Partenwood Road Mr. Alan Olson, City Planner, entered into the record the request for a variance of Robert Van Tassel, 1170 Loma Linda Avenue, dated May 17, 1978, which states: VARIANCE 1170 Loma Linda Avenue TWr- - - - -;- - Robert Van Tassel The applicant wishes to enclose an existing concrete patio on the lakeside of his home. The location encroaches on the 75 ft. required lakeshore setback and the 10 ft. required side yard. The house is located closer to the shore than the neighbors, but lower down. Views may be affected.(Continued) M L meeting OE THE ORONO COUNCIL „ V«iances: 34.45, .... .VariAn,. '-^UNCIL, Jv ariances: 34.452 side yard 7 - 3j.201 lakaahojf 5 ’ J"! 34-202 hardcover lo so 288 so* ft' house 9* ft. within 75 ft Page 7 co^losioo Meeuo, - Mrs Van T -s that Planning Con^iferormoved^f affe?tol!'‘^ the Comch''^eetinl"^i^tbo°e‘’bein^^^ Council Heating - io„, Note.. Neighbors not present VARIANCE 1170 Loma Linda (Continued) •Avenue of shore ^ ocrji t . T‘a°sstr°''" Conutussion minutes of Planning I'yaa (5) - Nays (?, f^ 1978. Motion, atat'e^f^^-^-^^e Road, dated'^^a^"'!,:^^?^" i'b%"o"h^''' The applicant pronos»»e 4- test year"'^®'' ^ subdfvS“'^yj‘ = House for new variances Ir^ H i^°PP®p et.al,) feque”!? S"“L%s°Vr^^ trt!ttt\tts (he ten.rit a ^ hirae „itt^r®”“3- the property li„e. Thrir^gl^e? o? ®the property line tkI ■'“'''*'^"y ^o 8 ft for permit had "erera? Pl»n suimuttri The o^rjuS f"P‘°^Phinrwlthe one corner noted^ encroachment Variance 3«,.452 - m ^ra. variance 2 ft. ,20%) ‘P1“ired, 8 ft. actual - Planning Commission Meeting . „sy 22, igyg Work _ ..-f X9/o ~"‘ral?|J:°"„;a"p;esJn“ “p?'' ‘He owners' staked ''^®" ‘Ha lot with^th"^?® Commissione‘eked m place before acUng”® looation ^"9 on this request r* r / t 7 ‘,- VARIANCE 2608 Mapleridge Road (Continued) TO: FROM: Planning Commission and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:August 22, 1979 SUBJECT:#507 Development Group, Inc., 3701 Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit/Variance/Building\Plan Review Application involves: A) Conditional Use Permit office building use retaining walls B) Variance 31.831 - 26' setback from Flood Plain (wetland) 35.043 - 20' front yard - buffer zone 38.170 - size of parking stall The applicant proposes construction of an office building in the Navarre Area just to the east of uho Good Shepherd Church. A review of the profile of the property poses r;.,un.lar concerns raised with the Navarre State Bank application. In cases whore commercial and residential zones intersect a property, it is the City's policy to limit the entire commercial operation to the commercial zone. In reviewing the site plan, I find a discrepancy in the supposed zoning line presented in the application and the one designated in the Zoning Code. See Exhibit A. Legal description: "all of Lot 7 and the east 200 feet of the north 100 feet of Lot 6, Block 7, Towns!te of Langdon Park; except wetlands." I suggest that before an indepth review of this application is made by staff, that the applicant must decide if his operation can function within a 200' by 100' area. Applicant's alternatives: 1. Present a new plan for 200’ by 100' area. 2. Request rezoning from LR-IC to B-1 for rest of area to the north of the wetlands. loreline Drive 'Building^ Plan Review .t from Flood Plain (wetland) ird - buffer zone cing stall ! building in the ;rd Church. A review icerns raised with the commercial and residential .icy to limit the entire y in the supposed zoning esignated in the Zoning 00 feet of the north Townsite of Langdon application is made by ration can function ea. rest of area #507 . •‘i* *i • w^'tr' ~V* ^‘-y I > ■ •» ' * f, ,'i :.wV. i; M i; . r liiil TT •!a-ir.„fcn-r,l *...« ,.■» ‘ > ^5:>v ■ ’ ’> ‘. I • •.. >-.-j ■ ■■V'^. *:■ ■ ■' -/- ^ , r r'r^-T'.-rr? MMUiic i> ■5 P- "■lteaa.Wg.^ . r ’H • »'• .. •*‘Tj*, -1. H‘ y"’* . -■' ■* i*V -ilyLiJViL ■-nl ■4'' ■ '>.'!?;''■■4 ''‘A; '■'e .:rm f c V'' . ^".* 4«^’'m 45C'*i . ...< ^'-^’^i ......*• \k^^- ;Nr.. DCVCtOHIgNT SUmUWY Hrrt. ^rt% Am^ €«hM4 »-l pn^iar AMM4 1^ 4«M»nMC4n» TtM 1»W»H tt MKU* TWIWBM- WfHHWn. / ^-1 *•.' V'- \. fc»l*T(i»4 ^OMiikA* PMrTliicr- 'tH «oww<4 ^ * S^y y/ ^ y/y - \yyy ■ / pmsuy-«» '■*•* «' -r.*nA ;;rw7i«-; -aa* i®: \ ) / \ \ ,ii mmI • M . Wr2>«i»f gnfl fart-j-.gy***— 9>1ft*7« man m yat I.Jfirvr ' i'hi!,D«v*lopment Group, Inc. --------------t- itl (n taa •••—• •»« •■ MM* Shoreline Offices -9* r 1 ■ M ^