Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-21-1979 Planning Packet
»-T «%irk i„^r» T>, Ji! AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY/22y 1979 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:30 CALL TO ORDER 1. Call to Order/Roll PUBT,IC INFORMATION MEETINGS 2. 7:30 P.M. #472 Ann Niforopulos, 250 Old Crystal Bay Road SUBDIVISION 3. 7:45 P.M. #474 Kathleen Gluek, 2440 North Shore Drive SUBDIVISION ACTION ITEMS 4. #477 Charles Peterson, 1505 North Arm Drive - VARIANCE WORK SESSION 5. #437 Larry Osgood, 365 Willow Drive North - SUBDIVISION 6. #478 L.J. Whalen, 2435 Scotch Pine Lane - VARIANCE & UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION 7. #480 Thomas WUliams, 455 Park Lane - VARIANCE 8. #481 Lowell Zitzloff, 3850 Shoreline Drive - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SITE PLAN REVIEW SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS 9. #460 Enervest Builders, 325 West Lake Street - SUBDIVISION/VARIANCE 10. #479 Chuck Van Eeckhout, 1025 North Brown Road - SUBDIVISION APPROVAL OF MINUTES 11. Meeting of May 7, 1979 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS 12. Tentative Joint Council/Planning Commission Meeting June 5, 1979 at 7:30 P.M. INFORMATION ITEMS 13. Tealwood To;-:iihouse Project, Long Lake - Tim Adams ii—t#USK piAK\nMr £i 4»*ii»vi fn M m t >T>r/g A a/ y?7y_ V LACGIE €)F (0)IM)N€) ^>41 •at'Ali ▼ M'LLS c m . n0f -} frili'‘iiiBliMj r A-»7 i L lAlil) IlSK PTAK\UMC r^\rt « ▼ ir* np« ^ #47 TO:Planning Commission and Coiincil FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:April 17, 1979 SUBJECT: #472 Anne W. Niforopulos - Subdivision 250 Old Crystal Bay Road SKETCH PLAN REVIEW - Zoning District RR-IB 'The applicant proposes dividing 34.3 acres into two lots; a 16.3 acre parcel and an 18 acre parcel to be dedicated to the DNR. Last fall. Planning Commission approved the future park plans for this site. The lots meet all the requirements of the zoning district. We will recommend a metes and bounds division for this property. At the time of the original Dickey Subdivision, it was understood that the remainder of the property to the south would be divided by metes and bounds. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APRIL 23, 1979 Planning Commission gave conceptual approval to the proposed two lot subdivision of Ann Niforopulos and set a Public Information Meeting for May 21, 1979. PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING - MAY 21, 1979 We recotimend preliminary approval of the metes and bounds subdivision of Ann Nlforopolus into two lots. The septic testing has been waived because of the large lots. The applicant has complied with all of the requirements for preliminary approval. r i; I L-^ND USE PLANNING FXWTR7T 1 April 17, 1979 Kathleen Gluek 2440 North Shore Drive Subdivision Page 2 #474 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING - MAY 21, 1979 The septic inspector ‘’’rio^®reeUgnmcn?^mlI?lt'prove poor condition and must ® additional land to correct e:i«inr“4uc proble: and afford additional land for alternate drainfield. uo raised several questions concerning the At our last meeting, we raisefl with large City requiring road ° ^^ictive upon future development acreage. Road outlets are and do not because they can be easily landowner. The ^rt;^“nrer«fin“’’p:d 1^ n^ c^ser-arforrcuaftlng an underlying easement. F.XWTR1T 1 i74 ! existing system is in realignment might prove iitional land to correct il land for alternate :ions concerning the livisions with large ipon future development Latting and do not le landowner. The through the means of Lying easement. In derlying easement. UND USE P1.AKN1NG ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO F.O. Horn 66, Crystal Bay, Minnesota )S323 EXHIBIT 1 673-7357 IlNSTBUCTJUSS ; Plcaae flrat read the attached Infcijratlon Sheet, Cc»rplete Itrca I - 13 (Type or Print). If needed, attach letter or otlier lnfox-.ailun to better describe your request. Inccnrplete applications will not be accepted. PROPERTY ADDRESS ________________ l.g.1 df.crlptloa .hall be abown on attaehrd Survey, Exhibit 3 APPLICANT Hifllng Addrea* ----------------------- If Applicant la not owner, explain OWNER phone Kelllng Addreas Date Property Acquired JcM ~l ~ ~7^ {Month/vear) 1 (1^) (do not) also own other adjacent parcels of land AGENT n>one Mailing Addreaa AgentNOTICES Should be sent to: V Applicant _ CWnar ___ PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT irv !■ »xV LR^/6 PRESENT USE _^C- (o**-*')- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - Vacant band Vacant Buildlng(a)Occupied Building(s) LIST OF EXHIBITS t .Pea c r 1 j>_t 1 Of| Initial Application eniat Include: Application Fora Property Owner a Mat Certificate of Survei Fee Receipt # Pate Received S L*i J[. Jo ^ orr.at Ion A Map 5 Inventory 6 Staff Cemente Other Inforraatlon DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIFATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 6 OOO.Oo _ eatabllah new %iee _ continue or expand exietinif %iee _build new l^add on ^ rcvodel _ replace Describe request in detail: TV C ^ ^--------------- ________77 r: ^ i-L Sic^^ V\ QvV. -e Lot Area9. VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED to do th. reque.ted Work: ----- Setback <_ _ Froiit Stdo _ _ _ Rear. Other Lot Widtb Hardcover 10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS preventing c^ll.m:. vltb lonlng Cod. re,ulr«»nt.: p)cc4)L I.tll ('Vi:*K eg c. K- Lvo 4 5 0.-4 L S i* ,, Describe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY re.uiting fro. .triet enforc-«nt of .oniog regulation* ^ V3 r \ A! 12. Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK on neighboring properties and on tha neighborhood in general: bg- fxpp^roif I ib4<ly V/4 __•^fpr-v The APPLICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER must sign and date th*s .. .. n»# ArrLlCAWT hereby agree, M prowlda all InforMClon Tha OUMDl baraby ochnow1odg< . and agreas to a^»uii< required or re^ueeted by the loning Adteinietretor, agree# end further authorixee reeeeeieble ^*^Sry ^to rnjp^ope y 1 revlcu by City aieff, coneultente, •gents, eo«leelon •euoeri.to pay ell fece end/or unueusl expenaee incurred in of thle application, and certiflae that tha inforaiatlon auppllad la true and corract to the beat of hie kncwledge: and Coimell for ptvp.ee* .f lnve*tlg*tlon and verification of title requosc: 5~9 Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date t:•. #» t I i I . \ f i •- «•-----------[TtrRTrrnmi ur MnMWLt ^ A-603 GOV£RNMENT CENTER —-MfNNEV^PqilS. MN 55487 11 # —* - -ft #4 NAME M _ AnriDCCC *\ PROPERTY OWNERS LIST f* ^ P,T1> DESCRlPTIpr Ahr /, J, ~ ... - - 1^ U^^WIO!diSbJ)R /t it // !S^. hJofoutfiM ~tA 1 7-/7 ^HN<^/teLS % 5^- MFC(dM&J>A ^ <^6 n tn/ VTfe KbmMtf, _22 6(^77- V!7 ^ ^i4B ^e<. -T P/^r£jejj , cemly that the facts rcp-efot^ on thii c6-ti!lc3t2 .•*".■ ih . ......._ . rndtri t f i. n <•- • • C * •ii-»\ ^r. t*. r* •* L •-'* t :.r«no. Co. *-J* J* PARCCb /k7A± 0r^7J>. 0.07^ fc c'.i: oi fcefc; 3< n»Y ur.». arc fci v t* ••,... H'V nn.-Mc; D'vy^"^.i, r \\^ Uiin CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT 5 r- t J I r? Ib /\ i'l 1 'C.J I -t'-r:: .1 rf t A . « • . « «. / . , i_ - -f :. .* !i.r.-V ;*V a #477 ■■• r:.‘: >r C . ? i: r.'“ i T h''. } V c'^rlify i-:. t 1 r. ;r?.' t- t! r:r It 'j trur tr..: rtrr-'** nl'r:C Lf.t ?0,Ci i*inr.* ?:.! ttclr<' o* fll t !r.f •...’i:*:,? t'-*rr-'r. It i**-.'? t pvr <4 t. tf s'lrv oU •. r ii pry.'*;'or.tt or -.trri-’^rl , ; k >1 /- t c Vj Ir o ' I* — *• • * u'r .; r. ;.. •oIJl:. Iji :.: *»ru :y L • 4. • • . 4;, L • ,^Sr •**"* I * >a I.i: •'I C* w^ StiBi * i j \ i \ F t V ■.. M -- r.^'»jj^MaiAS'^iiMi. ^""i. ,r'li * ,-. - *.-. EXHIBIT 5 WND USE PI.Am>’lNG ZONING VARIANCE IKV'ENTORY ■y?* VARIANCES REQUIRED ■DENSinr l4>i Km mm vfdOi ____________ J3,^C,ojf _J.3,kS3. Jjsl ___ .../_37.(i.’ SETBACKS ttlKlKUK UrOUJHTD »)S7XWC VXr]AJ«CC II , :? L __. Zoning Use District JLM'' L& Cipt_hlCTlCM ■h4. 4Sc FI-0PCM3>VKf^Z KVCX coot SfC7JC« iaI A SiL _3j/-^ /-SS wr w. r/5 HARDCOVER 75 rt. 75 rtK. IXir AKU _eax. tJ.____ F£P-*tJTTEll KXRDCOVIJI *.f . % o:iS7u:c KAROCOVOI «,f ^_______ PR Ol*OS CD KXW>CO\/EJl ________ T07XL VXJOAMCZ % *.f._____CODE StCTJOfI 31.031 WOa O - 20 Pt. o% Lftlc 0 - 75 Pt. cm l^k« 75 - 250 Pk. 2S« U0i« 250 - 500 PC.. 300 lAk« 500 - lOOO PC.. 350 34.202 34.202 34.202 34.202 i [OTHER SECTIONS juaoimgi OuiidinO B«i9ht (bas.) ---------------- Ipackiiif CMiA.I ,, I . —. CXISTPJC rnoposcD VKKJhSCT COPE SCCTIOt LAND P2V1SXOK:pi»t L____ RLS _____unpJ»»t«d O lot*/patcr1» ymx •ppliratSofi__________ AVAXLXSJLJrys •d^accnl lot«/p»ireX« |0I __ vacant ^^^uccvaplad _____ ownership par at* owner ship January 1. 1975 Ownrrahlp tingle teparate _____ cor.blnrd with other parcels not In thlt appllcatiofi TOPOCIurinr Incluaaas ____ laleahore _____wetlands ______ high ground _____level ground ______rolling hills l/; ate<»ep alopao open wooded GCCSiUPHy affecting applications _Jd^ unusual lot shape __ let aiac/shapet ____ consiatent_____incoi^stent with neichl«r>iood drvelofr.ent unusual building location ACerSSs new esiatlng — «‘i*3^ cx>uniy/st ate ____private U7IL171ESS City aewer _____ available con»»ectedj City water _____ available _____connected ■ — eelatirsg nonTonlc^ingaeptic eyat'new propoaed Itj^ exiating ronforning existing substandard TJ^ND USE Subjact lot ia CX1S71KG lAIlD VSt eexs PROPOSAL affacto vacant If occupied ed to roning uae diatriets enforcing tiae principal conditional uae accessory building or use non-oonfoming ueo STRUCTURES mSTlIlG BUIIDUIGS Oeficianciees _ _ _ PROPOSAL TYVti __ do ru>t coaply with coning pcrforaance atandsrda entirely NXRf building or uae review aa BDf buildir»g or oae fcoat exceeda 5Cm PffV| , ravimr aa EXPANSION of ejiiating Ccost lass than 500 Mlf| ___ iNisting bolldiog FAX0 HANXET VALOE (yr) ______ f_________ PROPOSAL trill will not reduco on ooisting substandard yard dioenaioa %AXES & ASSESSMENTS PAOPEsnr o. Lota/Parcela TAXESI _____ OM%ed in coanon _ are PAID currant aro •ro not legally cenbined for tan purpoaaa. Aaaeasoants Laviedi Sewer Cne| •re DELXNOVEJCT to year ^ units Netar frie) ___ units EXHIBIT 5 4 >7 *73.U District r^L-^^TlQ!! s4,.'f£‘’ kvcr CODt SECTJOI io_ TOTJO, VTJUAUCX S.f.i CODE StCTICf l 31. an 34.301 34.902 34.902 34.202 VXHIMICC CODE SiXTICW /ncrtthip •eparat* owner altip ithcr parcels not in this appllcatioii ounA ____ rolling tifllo . conr»ecto0 ndarO ____ cviatlr^f non-con ional uoo non-confontlrkg ye# USE planning STAFF COMMENTS & RECOIWENDATIONS prepared FOR:m M War.ning ConmJa.ion K«-etif»9 (2>ate| _ 7 ? Council H cting |Lal«) _ _ ------------------------- (Staff) I application reviewed BY; • h City Adiriniairaior • ^ City Attorney City I2r>/|ine«r Village Planner Zoning Adniniatrator Planning Gomitaiof^ ParA Cofrniiaion WerXa Coordinator ■ - *^lic Safety Director -------- Finance Director ----— Building Inspector -----— Septic lnsf«*ctor «*»•*>-------- fdateal______ . Hennepin Cty. DOT Minn. State DOT Kinn. DN2 HCWD L.H(3> SPECIAL COMMENTS :nj Kvmu ^ -etj UtiJS: >.1^ ea*a ^ ^ ^ y!>.enc^— /TMUL<fci £—^ i^la JiJU^ ±it STAFF RECOMMENDATION r. APPAOVC appllcetioa ee oulealtted ArrMVE application aubjoet to follcwinp conditiona ------- TABU application for additionnl infonaatlon ------- Oniy application for raaaona notad ahovo EXHIBIT 6 Page 1 Hennepin Cty. DOT Minn. Stat« DOT r.-ZjLif L.HO) IsteXjElSJ .i.,6 . ^ •• STAFF COMI-IENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED FINDINGS rfTf- tr-* condition, .pplying to the .troctufc or land iii que.tion are p.cuUar to auch ptoperty or in whJch*®*ld'*3»^^l ®PP*y 9«^nerally to oOter 3*nd Of atrurtuirt in the diatriet ^i* conditions applying to the structuie or lend In question sre not f>ecu1isr to such property or Rradistely surrounding property but do apply generally to other lend or structures In the district in which said lend is located. Ihe granting of the application ___ is is not necessary for the preservation and enjcyn«nt of a aubstantial property right of the applicant. Ihs granting of the proposed variance will not in any way iir.pair the public health, safety, confort* morals or general welfare; Oil The granting of the proposed variance ituiy inipalr Uie public health, safety, coralort. rorals or general welfare. The granting cf the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of the Co.-rpiehensive Land Usa Plan or the Zoning Code; OP The granting of the proposed variance would be contrary to the intent of the Cor?.prehensSve Land Use Plan or the Zoning Code. such variance will r>ot irterely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrated hardships or difficulties; OP Ihe applicant has demonstrated no recognized hardship or difficulty and therefore the granting of sudi variance would merely serve as a convenience to such applicant. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3. r TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission and Council Jeanne Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator November 3, 1978 0 SUBJECT: #437 Larry Osgood, 365 Willow Drive North Subdivision SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Mr. Osgood proposes dividing 9.9 acres into a four lot subdivision. All lots meet the zoning requirements for the district (RR-IB). The existing building meets all setback reqviirements from newly created division lines. Mr. Osgood has fumished a septic report for Lot B, but we will require testing for Lots C and D, the septic inspector will inspect the existing system on Lot A. The ac.!ess road serving plat is located at the edge of a designated wetland along southern property line. The pre liminary plans should designate distance from road to wetland. A northern access would be out of the question because of the bridge approach and factor of zero visibility to north. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - NOVEMBER 13, 1978 Mr, Osgood was advised to consult with staff concerning t*'e eligibility of the property for a metes and bounds division, STAFF NOTES - NOVEMBER 16, 1978 Mr, Osgood was advised that to qualify for a metes and bounds division he would have to divide the property into two lots of five acres. He informed staff that he planned on deeding his son a two acre parcel only, Mr, Osgood will proceed with his original plan of platting a four lot division, STAFF NOTE - MAY 15, 1979 I Mr. Osgood will continue with a three lot division because of poor septic test results for original Lot 4. He will combine Lots 3 & 4. Lot 2 will use a temporary access through Lot 1. When the third building permit is Issued the access road must be constructed. Note the 50' corridor platted for Lot 3, Lot 2 is effectively land locked with this arrangement. The road must be platted as an outlet. We have set a Public Information Meeting for June 11, 1979. Please review the septic inspector's report. TO: FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Septic Inspector DATE:May 15, 1979 SUBJECT:Septic System Site Evaluation 365 North Willow Drive - #437 George Osgood LOT 1 Existing house - septic system for the existing house has been inspected and needs only an inspection pipe installed in the second tank. The system is causing no visible problems and would appear to be entirely located within Lot 1. There appears to be ample room on the lot for future drainfield as necessary. LOT 2 i 1 Water table and percolation rates indicate a standard system will be acceptable for both primary and secondary areas on the lot. LOT 3 This large lot is combined with the formerly proposed Lot 4 due to poor soil conditions on Lot 4. A standard system will be acceptable for the primary system on Lot 3 and shallow trenches for the secondary. Note that both here and on Lot 2 the water table depth limits the suitable area for a gravlty*flow system and house placement may require use of a pump in the system. Please note that certain lots of the adjacent Woodhaven Subdivision to the immediate south of the Osgood property were approved by the City Engineer for mound septic systems in 1977. Testing on these lots found water table depths ranging from 12" - 17" much as were found on the previously proposed Lot 4 of Osgood's subdivision. Our present code states that a mound system generally is prohibited in any area where seasonal water table is not at least 2' below the surface. Development on the remaining Woodhaven lots will be carefully supervised by the City to ensure that ad quate sewage treatment systems are designed and constructed properly. Since these Woodhaven lots were approved prior to our On-Site Code, it appears we are probably locked into allowing them as buildable sites. \/• #437 istrator George Osgood house has been tailed in the problems and would ere appears to be necessary. andard system ry areas on the lot. ^posed Lot 4 due to em will be acceptable iches for the secondary, e depth limits the se placement may 3odhaven Subdivision are approved by the Testing on these ■ 17" much as were I's subdivision, srally is prohibited t least 2' below the 1 lots will be ad'quate sewage jroperly. Since On-Site Code, it ?m as buildable sites :' ir^,, IK CITY OF ORONO P.O. 66, Cr>ftAl Bay, Minnesota ^5>?3 ISSTKUaiOSS; rieat* fjtit read the attached lnfoi-at!on Sheet* Ct^a^lete lte*sa I - 11 (Tyj*e or frlnt). If needed, attach letter or other Infcr-^tlcm to better dracrlbf your requear. lncc:rplele appliratfona will not be accepted. PROPER'fY ADDRESS 24;^ Scotch Fine I^re, Orono, Legal deacrlptlc«o fhall be ahc^vn on attached Survey, Fjihlblt 3 APPLICANT L. J. Whalen _____ Ph.n. _ J*75-55?8_______ >'^iling Art.i,rM _ 24^. Scotch Pine lane, Cronp, ^inn. 55J9.1. A Receipt # If Applicant la not ^^*:»er, explain _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OWNER Kama L».. #_ V iIhlIc O Phone 475-559S___ - H.iiin, Addr«. ^24^ Scotch_?ine„l^ Date Property Acquired March 197 8_______ (H^nU./YrJir) I (do) (do not) also own other adjacent parcels of land AGENT ----------------------------------------------------- rim________________—------------------------ n»one Hilling Addreaa _ _ _ _ NOTICES Should be sent to:Applicant CV7>er Agent PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT ^ /P - ! fr (Other)_____________________ LIST OF EXHIBITS . [ l^acrIptlon Initial Applfrarion muat include: Application Torn Pfoperty CV.*nera LI it ^ Certlflrate of Survey •^Fee Receipt # Calr^^*Tclved __^ ^ * By ^ Staff Infoir^^tlon 4 Pl*t Map 5 Inventory 4 ____ Staff Coniien{n 0i her Jn f o tjrj 1 1 on 7 ------ PRESENT USE Vacant Lane _____ Vacant Bulldlng(a) _____ Occupied Butldlng(a) --------- DESCRIBE REQUEST / ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $-----6,yo,09 ------- __ eatabllah nao ua# Y cpntinua or expand exiatlng %iae V __reaodal ___replaco Describe request in detail: Request City of Orono to vacate the easeiBep^ running East and Vest across the property, and to g rant a front setback v*ri«nc?._4o --------------- allow Installation of ewlmning pool. Lot AreaVARIANCE(S) REQUIRED to do Che t»qur»trd work: ----- Setback f t/ Front ____ Side ------- Re*r) t^t Width Hardcover 10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS rr-mting cc:T.ii.nce wuh 7cn,mg cod. ..<,ui.e.,n.a: 1V.e combined effect o f set-beck reoulreg^ntg and the ^ by uTf^t easement all conce ntrate their effect on our front yard, asking It nearly useless. Describe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY re.ultlng frr« atrlct mforce=--nt of toning 11. reguiationa All of the land bet eeen our hou.se and the lake (nearly TOO feet by 12 0 feet wide) le trade unusable due to wet land and street setback reculrenente, and this 50 foot eeseiwnL. 12, Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK on n.lghhorlng piopercira and on the neighborhood in general: It would Increage value. Our neighbors to the V.'est have a pool which hae enhanced both ______ Lhflir prQpgrhy and the ne IghborhoodL The APPLICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER must sign and date this application ji/i? agree* Lo provide ell Inforewtloa 11,# tvvc* hereby acknowledgM end agrees to Uila eppllcatl. .Mulrad or reooeited by the Zoning Adalnl*lr*tor, agrees .od furcher authorliet reearmable entry onto tha pro^rty to pe» all fee* *nd/ot unu*u*l e»pen*e* Incurred In review of ^le *001101100, *nd certlfle* that the InfonBaclon :!pSud " IrC, and correct to the heat of hi* kn.vl.d..: by City aiaff, cunxultanta, agmra, co«laalon ximbera, and Council orxabcra for purfw»ara>^ Inwratlfxilon verification of thla request: Applicant’s Signature Date ,er's Sito/ture Date '.Y5^ nv'-'OKF. n.AN’rn^’G rn»‘M!S^TON r^’F-TTNC^j iXH:DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE ^ A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER ^ MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAME I____P^7> description Xfe; rpQ ^um\ —Amee-K S2fg-%J?Ua-M-WI--fAReHr #4 7 8 6/^0 N 6 l>mm- ft. -2A/<is:Mcm JoRoTdf2.^/zs 9k, H.Uu^MS't.CHeAiL liiu, '2Jfz£' 7 UoA/imceJz^3S~ '' y/MPLffrmO ^'//7 231 Oodl ~0M2\ // - // !/ /<■{ !/6607- I centfy tt»at the facn repre&cntco on this certificate are an acruraie •ntf true fep'eser.tatlon of infoirna- tion ai N appears this dale on th# records of the Menn. Co. Dnarrco Or*, to Ihe hcol of my knowieugt ondkeflof. - -------- Hann. Co. Finan» 9i<r>yiM Oate P77 I i X H I 8 i T ; a ^478;• -* r** l * *1 c '*• * - T v»: • %• • or ^ r\ 1, ;U - r^V4o' ^ Ocn^tcfc * ocdc crt a// '•btf’ o: : u:^oy: C'*T . Ifv t>ul Mr//* 'j/t" r'.rn.rt or. rf c - • . ^ ^ z' • . ' 4 ;.r;r:or. ar.d f ! 11 v -j‘.i-ifii: l-c*v .;. ^ fo* •••.,1 '»rt to •*: 'j»r or- X -r ** X 1 •« •■*♦•1 'f^' f.T I land use plakt ^ing ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY Zoning Use District VAU)I.>^LT cfxil Mtnw .VAR IANCES K_EOUIRED tiyuji-ja Ac nui, S^J , L 6??S.sr ^s, 3 / jj ,3f( 3^^ ' _ y <3L^l ' ^ ^ ■' - - - p»Gpo^T3> ^ ........ lijt viat3i SETBACKS 3 »•• 1 p.! ^ u 3 ki:d i_r i •, t j nc root SECTIOf P> Vo B)6f. l^ar »>«orO Wcl3 Ana* HARDCOVER 75 rt. 76 rt.. U7T AJiEA •fjj'_________ CF*_____ FEP.^urtn) KXIOCOVEB _______ IDTlSTlliC KA^KIKTOVOI »^o___ rnoposcD kakdcover ■.f._______ T07AL VXBlAjiCt • JL -____ »-»U« 75 - 250 rt.. 25*__J^7 ^StO^S*iO^F iM^km 2S0 - 500 FV Lftlitt 500 - 1000 rv. 15S . 30* _:^J^AigLgug 9,3 a«/^r *?~ / CODE S1C7K 31.on 34.702 34.702 34.702 34.202 t • OTHER SECTIONS Ouildifi^ B«i9hl fmait.l ^•tkinf iMLn.l REQ01RTD CXIS7ZKC PPOroSED vjm 1 ANcr CGDC SECTIOPI l\i v'.. I: c LAND DlVlSJOi: _____W-* _____unp3»ttoa O lo^p«frr)« per *ppliretSon V IT cAVAi3>^lLiTlfi •djerent lots/pAfcela I _ vjicenl occupied Jjnuery^ 1975 f^-nershlp^_^ tingle tepartte _____ conblned with other parcels not In this application ■■_ a^n^ crw7»rrahlp • rp*r»te Ow-nerahip .2-„u.ry tingle separate _____ conblned with other TOPCCRAIW include., 1.V..W. _\^«U,nd._____Ughgtound l.v.l .round _____aleep alopea ______ Ofien areaa wood 4 aieaa CE0CSAPH7 .ff.ctir.9 .pplic.tlon,--------unu.u.l lot .h.p.______ unu.u.l bolldln, loc.tion lot .ItcAh.F., ----- cor.l.t.nt _ lr.ro, .I.t,nt wlOi n.lgMorhrod d.v.lc;}.-..nt ACCCSSr------->.«r _y L .»l»tin9 .._UCcity ______cr>unty/.t«t. _ _ priv.t. rolllr>9 hills t*7lLl72£S: City ae«dcr ____avallabla _ c^nncpct ed; City water LAND USE Subject lot la_ _ _vacant occnipied E3C2S71KC LAKO USE cerr-iared to 2onir>9 ^e diatrlctt __ ronfc:t=!no FaoPOSXL af facta _____principal ^terraaory huilding or oaa _____ conditional uas non"C^nfocRlng uas do not CYuaply with toning performance standards STRUCTURES XISTIMG BUIXDIMGS Mflelanciaai _________________________________________________ |b0F06AL lYFEt ^ antiraly KH# building or use * —— review sa hlW building or use fcott evraeda 50g FIIVJ -------- revisM ss DtFANSlCBt of exieting fcost laae than 50B mV) _____ Ibl^atlng buildiiag rJUA MMUCCT yJOeOE (yr| ______ $ ROMMt -------win .ill net vodue* an aaistinf aub.tandard yard diiMoal^ kXES & ASSESSMENTS lorutv n. »ie/Pireele owned In FA2D current •ro la,ally coabiaod Cor «.« purpoa... »eaaaonte ieeledi . Sewer |no| •ro OElalMOUEinr to year ___ — *»nIlo _____ Matar (im)AiflllO M.902 1 - - - - --34.201 I!>34.101 1 1 -—— 34.101 Page 1 Ltl 1 Hennrpin Cty. DOT i a utility easement lot determine the ion. It begins at at the edge of a ild property. Lot 1 ng for the vacation y information concerning contact the City staff. land use planning STAFF C0>C-3ENTS & RECOhC-IENDATIONS SUGGESTED FINDINGS Ich said 3and i« located; OR T 9 ly to other lend or etructufet in the district Vhlch ..<a l.nd 1, lc.c;t;a. ^ ** S«n„.lly to other J.„a or .tructure. In th/au.Hct in The Scenting of the «ppliration 1/ 1. 1. •uh.t.ntl.l prcjerrty right of the^pUcrnC for the preservation and enjcyn«nt of • granting of ti»e piopoaed variance will •wraj. or general welfafa; M the public health, aafety. comfort. -y*' -y- p*..c .....y,, „ W..“w v.il.Be. .,m ... .. .. lh< i.t.nt ef th. Co..p,.l.„,iv* Land D m ^e granting of the proposed variance would be contrary tn ev « Plan or the Zoning Code. ^ ^ intent of the Comprehensive Land Oa« Ihe granting of such variance will not inerelv , to allaviata demonatratea hardahlpa or aiffJcultl..- at* ‘® “>« •PPUcant. but la receaaary 31:1^ *:::iV::rfr::r ‘::‘:.- -.......... - -o- SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. I .a^ i E X IH 1 3 I T ..-7- ’a's, the undersigned neighbors, have no objection ^o^^rnt'^on^tVa pSi/L I-. P 9' ^ S' Li''P A -P - be.. /i Z-i/ Vi^ 7^. 0^1^. -w> ' ( C-ht^. ^J. Lll\hO,[v^ j^vs /l/o ■C^'U'^ L. J. Vhalen 2i«»5 Scotch Pine Lane Crono, Minnesota 55J91 5/20/79 L.J. Whalen 2435 Scotch Pine Lane Vacation of easement and set-back variance Location of the pool on the south side of the Whalen house is based on the following factors* A.Accessibility to the following* 1. Patio Family Room La%m Dressing Rooms Bath Room 2. 3. 4. 5. B. Visibility from all major rooms* decks and patio* for safe viewing and supervision. C. No trees to remove. Location on the north side was considered and rejected for the following reasons: A. Accessibility only to the following* 1. Garage and driveway 2. Living room B.Visibility into the pool for supervision would be impossible* since the ground level to the north is five feet higher than next to the house. C. The only major treed area on property would have to be cleared. O.Any leakage prcblems with pcol would endanger house* since drainage is directly toward it. 'A. la.lAL 4-*r. TEMPLE ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 240 MINNETONKA AVENUE SO. • WAYZATA, MINN. S63S1 TELEPHONE (612)47S1M0 Hay 18, 1979 Mr. Sam Marfield 2455 Scotch Pine Lane Hayzata* Minnesota 55391 RE:' Utility Easement Orono« Minnesota Dear Mr. Marfield: In resDonse to your questions concerning the future 5 Maanlnt ea.t of your property, I have the folio-- ing comments: 1.The easement could accommodate sewer lines the approximate seven acre parcel to the east, witn ^dditioMl^l^S SSdiiided in^SIis pHcel? Jhe^®^ . on Scotch Pine Lane. 2.The easement also could accommodate a water would serve the residents on Scotch Pine ®"2oMiblv extend to serve the property on the east. would permit a "looping* of the water system which is an important factor in water main design. The above possible uses of the JSirfrS upon the dwlopment of a sewer and %oWithout a comprehensive sewer and water plan it is^difficult to assess the actual utilization of the easement. However, that the ea.ement could be used for either o»« .mar and water. It is my opinion that the easement should not STSaSSSn:! SSiess it c7n bS shown that ' design will not require an easement in this areas Sincerely, TEMPLE ASSOCIATES INC. Duane H. Temple, P.B. \ DHT:bjh uh.a?:- >.1. * b HOWARD DAHLOREN ASSOCIATES (mconmumco CONSULTING SLANNCRS 21 Hay 1979 MEHORANDUH ONC GROVCLAND TCNNACC MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SSAOS TOi City Council, City of Orono FROM: John Shardlow REt Variance Requested by Hr. and Mrs. Whalen, Lot 3, Block 1, Dicon Addition, for the Placestent of a Svimsinq Pool In their Front Yard Dear Menbers of the Council: He have recently been asked by Mr. Sam Marfield, Lot 1, Block 1, Dicon Addition to review the above mentioned variance request and advise hi» regarding its affect on his property. The Marfields moved to Orono to take advantage of the quality of life afforded by Orono's "Estate Ares* and are very concerned about the effect of the Whalen's proposal on their privacy and quiet life style. The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Orono which was prepared in 1974 recognized the City's special attractions and the special desires of its residents. The establishawnt of zoning districts with generous performance standards provide the means of insuring that the goals expressed in the Cong>rehensive Plan can be met. After reviewing the variance request and several of the unique characteristics of this plan, we can only conclude that this variance as proposed, is detrimental to Mr. Marfield's interests. Certainly one of the major reasons for this conclusion is the inclusion of a public street in the plat. We noticed with interest that this was the only public street between County Road IS and Bc^'s Point and was clearly over-designed for servicing these three properties. The area in which the Dicon Addition is located is currently zoned for two acre minimum lots with 200 foot minimum lot widths. Although none of the lots in the Dicon Addition conform to the required performance standards, %«e were unable to find any indication that the City intended to vary from the purpose and/or intent of the LR-IA District in approving this plat. Consequently, we can only conclude that the required minimum performance standards in this District should be applied to these Ics. With the inclusion of Scotch Pine Lane in this .. A ^ . I 1 memorandum TO; City Council, City of Orono Pago Two rlU Whalen property will be located In the j required front yard area. The requested variance is, therefore, not in irpio^osid* *"*'*"*^ purpose of the zoning district in which It^ = It is the expressed feeling of the Marfields that a public street is not needed to service these three lots. As the City is aware, he has there ^Id be no need for a variance to locate their pool where thev K M “1*2: s: for nr“.?Ti^ir ““ «*i» i« th. .{iproi.rl.to IcjnioT^ rLr.rihJrjr^b”!:;:’ “ Sincerely, HOWARD DAHLGREN ASSOCIATES, INC. John 3^ Shardlow • • • •j • . % Pag* TWO ' n; .’1 . ^ ■'V 1 b* located in the j ia* therefore, not In district in which it a poblic street is Lty is aware, he has . sp renoved, end th* •9>f** to this vacation, leir pool where they Pine Lane remains a my variance fros the private swimming pool. I to locate a pool and appropriate location sated tdiere it is •sned from view and ‘ yon for th* 1 look forward to his problem. \*,=A ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO P.O. ftom 66_^Cry^.*l B*y. ,o!.r Inc^lr., will no. W .ccpted. PROPER'fY ADDRESS ____ Wg.l de.crIptU’n iV^ll be .l.cwn on .tl.cf-d Survey. Exhibit 3 480 1^^-. —-------------• applicant Thomas.~ i-.iun* Addre.. 4^_TonkawaVad, Long LaXe, Mn. 53356 e If AjpUcen* !■ not «'--n»r, explain _ ---------------------------------- OWNER K*:»___SAME Kalllng Addreat Date Property parcels of land| I (do) (ato:i«iK) also own other adjac i agent --------- nipne LIST OF P:XHIB1TS # Prhcrirtfon t nit i«l^ cr.iBt Include: ^ 2 Pioprrty 0-*neri Llet^ I Certificate of Sui-we. te<; berelpt —— ( Tat* R.celved ----- • 8, ^ Staff .lnf«'irJtl_on 4 ^ Plat Map ^ Inventory 4 Staff Co:i^enti Otjier Tnfci-Jtlon \ \ rir* Mall1ns Addrra* 5 notices Should b« aent to: ------ Applicant • 6. PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT 7. PRESENT U'^E Ka.ldcn.l.l ___ CWier Agent (Other) ___ _ ..tabllfh new t»« _ contlnu. or ..pand .xlatln* ua. Describe request in detail: - - -- - __ build new __ add on _ rraodal — raplaea *y- 9 VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED X- s,.r..r( r,o„ _ s.r. — Lot Width Kar dcover 10 Describe URUSUAl. PROPERTY CONDITIONS ^ X . acre lot then ^j^Jj^lot_iejoooUt4_W.Je^^^ --------- - __________—-------------------------- ~ TTnAr*T.r*ftl TUmPin ’PY rasultlr.t fita atrict mforcewrit of toningioii^TTbe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACflCAL DUFICULfY 11. *_____________________ I rrgulatlone -----------------------------—------------------------" "" ' __________ ____________________ t.^1 12. Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK .. .. . . . ... . . r. MA«a> - all on«a finllv reBidentisl ------------------------ - ■PI, iPPi ICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER siust •fS"*'”* Sf ne'a:;;'lur.:-iu-Si4K:-:i ur.sl.u- - Applicant’s Signatufe Vl&mct's Signatur^^-'^^we nFADT.TN nl DAYS RFFORE PT.ATvNIt^ s ..........meeting XHIBIT 1 480 list of exhibits 0 Pr»CT>ptlol> I Initial Ajj>llc*tloa tmi%t include: ^ 1 Application for* ^ 2 froprrty CV.-jirrf M»t^ 3 Certificate of Sui^e. -----—“ 0 r«ite Received ----- • By - Staff Infoj :*-'^io!l 4 ^ Plat Map 3 Inventory Staff Co:ju*ent* Other Tnfc'xr-ation 7 ^ to \ \ I' riON COST $_________ new _ add on _ rraodel — replace lx>t Width Hardcover f with zoning Cc<>€ r»q«l««*"*•• ininK • ultlng fit* ttrlct rT.lf«c«-^t of toning J 4iggj on the iteighborhood In scnerel: l... .•nn.Mklo mmn Miltnntn. ngontn, •*“**?*^,— *, i0t ■iirifTTr mt ta»«nttg»it«» ignature-^----- t ANTsH NG cn^?n SST HC5S< DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE _______A t A A n 1^^ iki I l_d. R n ff PROPERTY 0V.'!JERS LIST « i-«• h/O NAME Pt'7> description ffg- ^aFei)i, ----:rr,-:;rx:S3l3iJ -iwctu- h/67 (S'^ VDtri~rl/a-iii'^ CjsJJ/VtKnlf^^Na^ ^ ^ qcH 'er/f/m'i If “ /Am535^ .O 1 1 , certify thM the rep^eT...t^ en lh-5 CTirt.:. ate are an acri;*ate end t.ue rcp-et..--:-.t- ••■.=>" m records of the Htnn Co. F.na-.e U.V.. to t..c ocsi 01 a., anO btHef. _ , ------ hVSS.'CS. H'*-' Oeie (1^fk)P£^TT. I ^ r* w r4 f f • I V l I .> t ' .• •. t- *• r r - «.*T....wi «X te- ••• ^ • ..*•♦••• |m '€ \ A^CuI'^ :a / <f.<t.• i* i>Y ;5 i: ' 6 i t I certify thil thi?. if s tr..* nrc rr-rrect r.?rc:.v r.t-.t'cii cf h r-r\c^ cf the ><cvrs:rJc5 of l«ot.E 1 «r.c Z, rlork p, Kir.n*-to!»<a Turrit 7{.t-..' It iot:r rot rurpcrt to rhc v irprrver.er tr or er.cj rechn=r.uj. O • • Zrt^lC U.\i c i** ~ • •. A rr I -7? . i uf.f, ; :c.t; th _-J i..r% r.: w 7 'rv I t "T T> n *T* C '’V 'il >|r G X M ! !3 . -J • ►4 , ; « ; • ^i " %1CJ •r- ■yi A C> ! ^!f f\ ^"‘*r ''.v- ’^. • i — ./ Z -m o A ■IS1^» ^ •» 4, • •“ —- I' Si'-n A ^ 5 ns- VJ 5$ Si Cl'n OK OKONO LAND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY tXHlblT 5 XL O J variances required DENS 11^ H)K)K-jK M'/j; Zoning Use District XS f ^<>0. JdOl ^ V#.|ilKWCT ___ J J-, OUO rtoi s»cT)C^ X/ ^ 3V'.-/rC^ SETBACKS y.lK IrrjK >tc>ui»^ C/»?.T.l>'=---------- .»»‘QL--^’3* vak : kwoc . coot SICJlJQf 75 rt.. 76 Ft,. U7T TtJlCJi JL*X. i Xs--------hardcover O - O - 7S 't. «-------------- 75 - 750 f*- *** -------------- l^m 750 - 500 Ft.. 30* -------------- L>)i« 500 - lOOO Ft. 35*-------------- F£F-*'JT7E1> HAKDCOVER • .f^__________i ntis7i>ic HARDCOVTCR ft .f• V*------ »»RDPC6ED hakt *coviia ft.f t— - rOTM. V'T wJOAWC* % •.*---------- CODECS l^|C 31. an 34.702 34.702 34.202 34.202 OTHER SECTIONS waau^ •uliOiny B«i9>*5 l“».> ----------------- PAftkina ““ “ PCISTIW proposed y^lRWCt COOC_SCCTISL LAND u„pl.tt.a * lpt./»-.rc.l. ,-i .pplic.tion — - ~~ ^ _____CTWTK ................... z ^ .......topocra •t»«p ftlo|«ft croCKAPHY •ff«ctir»9 *r?^* Jot • I »€/»>••?•* ACCESSI IS^tiont vnu.u.l Jot .>..1-_____uru.u.J toulldlng loc.tion _ Inronii.tfnt wlO> ».»lsVJ«»>.<*•* arve1cj»-«nl M ooxir.iy/»t•!« ^ privfttft rtW - ■ —Ir. 1 1 .>i*• cooiiectftO ---------n-ccn,o™'». land use /tubj.et Jot i* v.rant - di.txictt jX_ cor.for=ln9 «•• OJSTIM JAW) USt . .ccs.ory J.ulJtfU.9 «.. mOFOSM. oflFCt. _y_ princJP»»-------- _ otc*\jpiAO /conditionftl Mmm r»ori-ronfontlr»9 STRUCTURES 0JST1JK2 aoiii>i«cs Dftficl«ltci«4» . FROFOSIO* TTFEt not rooply will* woninq f^xSomunce promal ftfiXI \/ «ntir«ly W12f bulJdi«9 or u.« Rft KIV builOin9 or «•• lco»l eftCfteOft 50» rKV| ----- iftviftM •• EXPANSIOW Of OAifttlog Ccoftt !••• SO* FlfV) CRi.tino bulldioo FAIR hmucet VALUt |yrl ------- •_------- r«duco ftfi oAifttiog ftubftlftndftrd yard Ola^ftitvill not taxes & ASSESSMENTS PROFurrv n>. ----------— l^fts/vftrcalft w^«d in tiULF^i curtant t/ .r. not J*9*JJy eotblnoO for t«» iwrpo.M. mrm DCLWOOEKT to yaar . ________ H;2. f''3. : m h f _ : • 4. !. i: S. ii-* n.II. A>» It &:■’ 1 ""J p> A >5.-^•^i»y #8.It is requested that a lot size variance be peitnitted for this property so a single family dwelling can be constr’ucted. When property was purchased Orono records showed that a variance had recently been approved for previous owner allowing for one family dwelling construction. As I understood, the reason for a variance was due to the odd size of lots only measuring 75 ft. rather than the required 100 feet on one end. Subsequently, the Orono Sanitary Sewer Project 73-1 was completed and caused the taxes for th.s property to increase considerably. This increase was due to the special sower assessment which is predicated on one dwelling unit. J TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator May 15, 1979 SUBJECT: #481 Lowell Zitzloff, 3850 Shoreline Drive CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SITE PT.AN REVIEW Conditional Use Permit - Office Space & Auto Supply Store Zoning District B-5 - Navarre Business District The applicant proposes two alternate plans for his auto supply business and rental office area. Plan A will afford an additional 800 s.f. of retail area that the applicant feels is required to operate at a more efficient level. Plan B, his second choice, will be adequate. Area - required: 20,000 s.f. existing: 35,000 s.f. Width- Required: 100' existing: 175' Setbacks 1, Front Yard - required: 35' proposed: 84' 2. Rear Yard - required: 35' proposed: 64' Plan B proposed: 44' Plan A • ^ 3. Side Yard - required: 15* proposed: 10' right required: 15' proposed: 26' left Staff recommends we require the 15' right side yard setback. There is adequate room to make the adjustment. Landscaping - Buffer Area 1. Front Yard - required: 20' proposed: 10' Staff has no problem with the proposed 10'. Policy has been to require only a 10' buffer in Navarre Business District. L May 15, 1979 Lowell Zitzloff 3850 Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit Page 3 Additional Information Required from Applicant: 1, Certificate of Survey 2. Picture of Building - design, height, sign, etc. 3.Drainage Plans calculate hardcover areaa.^ — - — b. volume of runoff - potential storage capacity of pond 4. Landscaping Plans Revlewine Agencies 1. 2. 3. 4. M.C.W.D. Hennepin County Highway Department City Engineer Public Works Director Variances Required Side Setback Variance -Required: 15' Proposed: 10* Variance: 5'33.3%. Parking Variance (Plan A) -Required: Proposed: Variance: 50 44 12% Please note that the office area for both plans A & B do not remain constant. How does this affect application request for additional retail area for more efficient operation? etc. rapacity of pond 3.3% 12% k & B do not remain >st for additional Lana use —- - location of proposal Cor property) -^€s^ U-v-^A'Address j::rr-:L-- - -—- - --- - Legal Description - --- - - - - - - -^ applicant -^ Address _£CC^-U - - OWNER Name Mailing Address _ Tel type of REQUi/bi , Subdivision $150+$l0.^/l Re^oning $250 ___ Riprap $15 (?55) J/ oo -75 fee 7/ -S^x___ Date Rec’d^^lr-/-::^-^ By Present Use Present Zonxng zoning Ordinance Section Relating^to R^uest ^ Explain your request and reasons for same VARIANCE required lot Area extent of nonconformity Setback Fron^ Other Rear Specify hardships i^bperty SUBDIV1S1QS, applicst ion Residential Other, explain No. of lots CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property detail 1. .Application “"Pl«*** rfemcatr^f survey of P«per^ sRetch location and setbacks of 4. ^nf^ruction plan.. If applicaLl. xannxiiy - - s. c^ertmed «°P«,f^.r'',:^‘)“fro:’l Z^epin Co""Dept^ of Finance e-603 envelopes (#1 pre-^es.2d to each of the na«i| on the ahoe* U»t- _ Applicant's Signaturej. C-^ 1 owner's Signature oi^ - - - i7ATE__^- -1- -- - - - -— orovide all inforrotttton requ commission dXX fGBS BS __ type of request t Subdivision #4o i Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($55) B - - -;—z:r^ te Rec’d js£_r-/— Nr 7 Rear ther ixplain NO. of lots of property in detail ;TE application Commission meeting) titled property ers within (300') *’”*1 nlpln CO. Dept, otO^ver^nt^^n :SSie.Sd to each of the n—( list. ornS. Pl»n"i«9I and further agrees to pay 5/78 MINNEAF'OLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAME P.J71> description pflprn _____ J7-/I7 I , ^ , F iO'B o'AZ.Soffits . 6 ---- B.O. d/n^Do^F 379oF^<imf^iiM. MiT-ftTf{7Sb'39L It " j ^ .. uor <ss.Msi M<iL'ilHF7(CT^-3f i>c smeuM/i etitsci^ec- rjj??-7 loo^ 0002- ){;kmmNU7^m -y>riN H-8(i/icJL 20rMl 3(77z 7/ //i' // 5 Scj/<as^.!^©o?77 I : ' 70-SlXi/7axM-^^^ - -J \ certtty that the facts rfP'.-ffrt-d on tnts • - t * + -e ar'J t*LC t z 'C. * - • o* 4?.-., t» . r - • •*____!___111 fer.c«r:l5 of M: ! cr;.-. Cr. F. : “Cd t- t."^***^ C-- Yi / *' ** *~ '* * ~ fcr ♦.• L''.« r.. » *~ '^.-n Do A5 23J22, CioM- \2\\o^l ^ f>aRTt^-T PiicPaeTy • I / lit TO: FROM:- Planning Commission and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator DATE:May 15, 1979 SUBJECT: #460 Enervest Builders, 325 West Lake Street SUBDIVISION/VARIANCE SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Enervest has received approval of a variance to Ordinance No. 219, the Stubbs Bay Moratorium. The approval will allow for normal review of the Planning Commission but no action by Council can be taken on the preliminary subdivision or variance until expiration of the moratorium The applicant proposes a lot realignment of Block 2, Lots 4, 5 and 6, Hillside Park, into two lots. This will allow for a more acceptable building and septic site for the newly created lot and the existing house on Lot 6 (Donald Doty) will be without violation. Mr. Doty has erected a fence that runs 20* deep and 60* along the south side of Lot 5. Lot 1 will access from County Road 135 (Tonkawa). The applicant must understand that no setback variances will be allowed. The existing house will require a side yard variance only. The north side yard has been increased from 1* to 20*. The fence will run along the newly created lot line. Please review the enclosed memo from the septic inspector. List of Variances Required: Lot Area Variance - Ordinance 34.352 Required: 87,120 s.f. Proposed: 45.712 s.f. Variance: 41,408 s.f.487. Lot Width Variance - Ordinance 34.352 Required: 200* Proposed: 150* Variance: 50*257.* • < /. ^ i May 15, 1979 Enervest Builders 325 West Lake Street Subdivision/Variance Page 2 Septic Variances; A. Setback Variance for drainfield from neighbor's well Required; 75' Proposed; 60' Variance; 15'207. B. Drainfield Variance Required; Proposed; Variance; 10,000 s.f, 6,000 s.f.- 7.000 s.f. 4,000 s.f. - 3,000 s.f. i . i 4 •• d from neighbor’s well 0 s. f, 0 s.f. or PROPOSAL (or property)« % Address •yT'. XtJu. 'M v'i- //y ■ yy J £ Tel ^lys JC// Legal Description _/>% H±y J? /?^ applicant Mailing - - Address C^ac, ^ OWNER Name /S._ _ Tel / ivision $150+$5/lot nditional Use $50 r Variance $50 Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($65) Mailing Address VJ ^ FEE ^0,06 -h jrs yy> Present Zoning ^ ^ -_/ Date Rec'd_^;S. ^ - 77_ By y /?v. L- Present Use iL Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request ^ Specify Ordinance Requirements yrr^j^Cc^^^ ~ ojj ^ j Explain your request and reasons for same _ _ _ _ _ —-- - - - -^ A I VARIANCE required i/ Lot Area ✓ Width extent of nonconformity _ _ _ Setback Front Side Other, explain ^ ^ Rear _ _ Specif hardships to property r'i SUED rviSIQgapplicat ion >/ Residential Other, explain NO. of Lots CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain F *oposed use of property in detail MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) Application completed Plat map section Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal Construction plans, if applicable 5. Applicant * u ‘signature Certified Property Ovner's list of owners within (300') (150*)- from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10! pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list. 0*mer*s SignatureDATE. Applicant agi^ees to provide all information required or requesteTw anM rv»** nistrator,. City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Oonaaission all ^M^as establl^ d*by”^*^di* »PPlic«tlon and further agrees to pay 5/78 1 J r A/'/x I PoO dtr-/U NO. 1 35 i.*____w~Tj U Ai *. IP 4P 01 0» o Cl tWj . r y • - % . .• < u*M * « : ^T/o^ -------------• _ \,V - 'tJ*. •*-•«• I* *• »«C •rsn*" f V .s alley r I / J ^ I k TO: FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Septic System Inspector DATE: February 9, 1979 SUBJECT: Audrey Heiser Property, Lots 4-5-6, Block 2, Hillside Park testing and mapping has been done by Hickock & Associates to identify suitable areas for use as drainfield. s ss.".r.S" use as drainfield due to the proximity of neighboring wells and an field now and one future drainfield for the proposed home. This proposal requires a number of variances from the septic system ordinance: Required Proposed 1, setback variance for drainfield from neighboring wells.75'60' I feel this variance is allowable from a health standpoint since state code requires a minimum 50 setback if the well(s) are over 50 deep. Well to the north is 98' deep, well to the south is (by owner's understanding) about 200' deep. 2 Variance from requirement of 10,000 s.f. dedicated area for drainfield to allow 6,000 s.f. The 6.000 s.f. could be enlarged to about 7.000 s.f. by allowing drainfield up to 10' from property line rather than 20* in the code. PCA standards allow It from property lines. Also note that slopes on the drainfield site range from 16% to OX which is in the maximum range for drainfield. Special design considerations will be needed for the drainfield to ensure no sidehill seepage will occur. S3^ -jamsi.-—r February 9, 1979 Audrey Helser Property Hillside Park (Lots 4-5-6, Block 2) Page 2 Kf There Is an unused old well on the site which must be properly filled In (abandoned) prior to construction of dralnfleld. My feeling Is that an adequate dralnfleld can be Installed on the site leaving room for future dralnfleld expansion, with the stipulation that no building permits will be Issued for construction In the dedicated dralnfleld area and that the owner properly abandons the existing well on the site, and that all construction conforms to Orono code. •-■f. .r a - •• • % * - ’Tfi I ' » • . I: , I-*-i.AKC ST o » • KO'iiO‘\tl-o- 75CD + .FIZO''** • ' 7J^o 'X y^^J(L S' 3 'O; • A O VO S10 fc'?; V;'j > •!’•*.■. 4:': •If- •#• • • * *.‘ •» • /; - ^} \ * •• • '* i\ • •• 5^.0 I St lA . • . ••• .*. r ^ <* .» ' •• *’ • •• w* * • * ■ . ' ••■• 4 •■■. .-■ f;-' > }4^:: > ;‘4- r.'/ }- ■ •'• "i. <Vi'.'?* .. , ••• j - .TV • Hint of furvoy • ‘ for Dnn-jld T. Doty • of Ifit 6, Flock ?, UlllBide }>rk lloi.nepln Cotmty, FJimosota V -v: • •:* 4 •*. - • . V ■' • • 4 • . - 0 * .>ri; •*. ^ 4 -V^y• • r,- ' . V#* :* t# 4 M,. jm ^ 3r> •: V.CerilfIrate of Survey: > • - . % vi I hereby certify thut this Is a true i„d oorrret «?rcr.en1/.Uc.n of . .urvay. =,,v- .y .j; of the Ixjmidarlec of Lot f| Eloex 2, * \0 J ' ^• « .*• f.: *.*.• V;> ./ -.-i • •. * . • • *» / .* . • .• -t • .• .. - •••. i, *•% • . : •* - or T.ne iwiiiiuoii-=4* w. — - ■ ' Hillside perk, und the location of «1 ^ or oncro-*c)ipent8e Lnn7sui-veyor and Hlenne'r Loop Loke, rjnivisot* * ;• .•v;; ••? • • • ^ Scnlo; 1" - 60' Into : V-P1-V7 o : Iron rark^sr ' ' ’’h * m ^ • • 4 I .;y , • • • •• *1 .• • ) M I Pif \ . • L .* ' •• •'• »• 1 • \ \ *• t. ! .S' Uw0« :ain fH r-^ •H X* Moo T3c .3 n 3 • ♦-> 0»• c 4-» «^4 ococ.» o o nCfrcrsll C><x:rs o 1 M ^c•H rH 1 vC CV •« co •<-1 •H u & o rH CQ O CO a j 4 ^ TO: FROM: Planning Commission and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth, Asst, Zoning Administrator DATE:May 16, 1979 SUBJECT: #479 Chuck Van Eeckhout, 1025 North Brown Road SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Zoning District RR-IB The applicant proposes dividing a total 16.62 acres into 7 lots. There is a designated wetland of approximately 1.5 acres that must be tied into each lot. It would appear in this sketch that the developer plans to designate an outlot for the wetland. Staff has no problem with recotnmending conceptual approval of sketch plan. GENERAL REVIEW ACCESS - to be off Brown Road to be approved by the Public Works Director. This will be a 50' private road designated by an outlot with a cul-de-sac (600' in length) with a turnaround radius of 40' and a right-of-way of 100'. LOT CONFIGURATION: A, Side Yard Setback - The house location for two of the lots do not meet the 30' side yard setback. B. Lot Width - Three lots are considerably shy of the necessary 200' at the building site. WETLAND - Lot lines must be drawn through wetlands and designated by drainage easements. #479 Lnistrator Brown Road acres into 7 lots, r 1.5 acres that must Is sketch that the i wetland. Staff jproval of sketch plan. by the Public Works ;e road designated ' in length) with a :-of-way of 100', Lon for two of the setback. ably shy of the tlands and designated *•: Land Use Application • location of proposal (or PrOPeyyL Address re.,. Legal Description ~ CfPE OF REQUEST t'^U\Subdivision §150+$/(J'. <9^ 7’i'» 7^, cr) ___Conditional Use $50 I __ Variance $50 applicant Name , C t fi/cjc L Tel ^IS'OSZ' Nailing 'PA I ^ Lezoning $250 __ Riprap *$15' '($65) ^ _% is'cts CWNER Name CMuCtC l/a,^ Tel # Nailing __ Address K€= m AgC:>L >q FEE Date Rec * d • *T^ <i - ^ Present Zoning i S Present Use F~ie» i.^ Ordxnance Sectxon Relating to Reguest Specify Ordinance Requirements ^ ^^#'479 Explain your request and reasons for same Tr^ -/amp— 7 l^cpr- LttI^ je/?eo+ H O VARIANCE required _____ Lot Area _ _ _Width extent of nonconformity _ _ Setback Front_ _ _ _ Other, explain Side Rear Specif hardships to property SUBDIVISION application V Residential Other, explain NO,, of Lots CONDITIONAL USE AND OTOER - explain proposed use of property in detail NINIMUN MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) !• yApplication completed 2. i/p:Plat map section 3. Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal 4. Construction plans, if applicable DATE ^ _ _ Applicant's Signature Certified Property Owner's list of owners within (300') (150')- from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center Stamped, legal sized envelopes(#10' pre-addressed to each of the names on the abQye list. DATE <X»mer'8 Ignature Applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or reouested fcL ; till 2a» 1 ft ::;r/x^ t • 4 1»5[l J^ r . ^1 *({ V I i %n —zrt ,■"1 J2» 1 ( *0 *»»* •* Am . m J--A ^ . f J** >’» ^ '**»■' ^^‘w»rtn«««i oAfUr of Uw gouW.Wit qusrtor of cotton 3J, T^*i.lp , 5t»i^li«lpol h.rt«.r, o-**qi «>• foU«%lBf porlloo t^iAof. * .trio icpu of Bamlloi *.lth oiM .djorort t« tr« eorUr lino of Vo rkeiflo toUw Co»p»ny, »* ur«At Itortt^opti hollrood Coupon/ to vr> oo huran^n Itert t q'Mirtor. i •*••. of uio tdt*. l/ln, of «t. rot. I .mMO- <»»r AM*# ^ OOROON R. COFRN LAND SURVEYORS 8 ENGINEERS LONG LAKE , MINNESOTA PROPOSED SapDIVISlON FOP \ . \/an Eeckhout Building C orporation Jmo Rl^S NO 926 * 'll -1 /'A »* I m.' •' -0 A .V *■ T f'V‘' I ■lid,. V'-i /■; SCALE. 'I’INCH'60 FEET - 0»r£r A44/ 7rG7$Si'Section ! 27 on OF #479 "Total £yc4,oojA/^ S. &ouim — /<i.<^2 i <\r-V 11 ..T.. In mmm #iM< «4b tw '.j5B«Krir- •c**^ wnji '"neniBSk..-..,- ”*■ i-. ■ ___ W.V ■L^xW' ' f ]s^ 5% •«« «v» m - yn* i^‘* M»X^ <|M - *%. <«M *«r TSf*' 0-\ %M. "*rt - «?wf •«Mt - / rj fn^yi ♦“I :».t kw« «!«%■<■ «* J»,- V ' M* * 1M!Q flfc iiu« ««T - ymf «M. ««« - m:* «-S ^.t - flS'* <)».., «•«!«.>» / 4i> A V > I • t fm^ nir fu« UK i4o' MrM MU tw -a*^ 14»t m W i V ‘ '■'■ -, ,*i- ■ ■- _____ / n t ftk>*> «W^ )«• V ' r-•y !f 1 i j, /..1 ' -»( « yi - i tV^y^ f „>/ ' '^' ■ ' y>cj^ ’*^u\ ^iy''''''r'i.;‘‘*'^*^^ ji'\'"''’V'/ —4' ■ i ^ c-Tt fi^«r •5 cJl f ”t4L » .