Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-07-1979 Planning Packetf^r- AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 7, 1979 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER 1, Call to Order/Roll PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING 2. 7:30 P.M. #471 Richard Ralche, 2901 Watertown Road SUBDIVISION ACTION ITEMS 3. #435 Richard Perry, 440 Willow Drive South CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 4. #466 Gary Petersen, 1340 Baldur Park Road SUBDIVISION/VARIANCE 5. #476 James Touve, 4196 North Shore Drive VARIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6. Meeting of April 23, 1979 INFORMATION ITEMS 7. Windward Marine - Amendment to Resoli^^ion No. 1023 8. Sanitary Landfill Site Selection H-a-tyAA ^ -LAGIE OF OIRONO \ TO:Planning Commission and Council FROM:Jeanne A, Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:April 2, 1979 SUBJECT: #471 Richard L. Raiche, 2385 Shadywood Road SUBDIVISION Sketch Plan Review The proposed four lot division was presented to the Planning Commission in 1977, receiving preliminary approval on February 14, 1977 (#222, Sunny Knoll, Ruth Wear Estate, applicant). The plans have not been changed from the original proposal. Review of Items to be considered: Peview of access road by John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator 2. 3. Drainage approved as presented on Engineer's plan for plat road. Access road to be determined (private vs public). If private than proposed 24' wide, surface of 6" of Class 5 gravel is acceptable. 4.Underlying easements (road and utilities) over road outlot to be obtained by City. 5. Septic testing for all four lots to be reviewed by staff 6. Title opinion addressed to the City. 7. Park Dedication Fee ($250.00/lot) ■ $1,000.00 1“ I- r 1 April 2, 1979 Richard L. Raiche 2385 Shadywood Road Subdivision Page 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APRIL 9, 1979 Planning Commission gave conceptual approval to the proposed four (4) lot subdivision. They scheduled a Public Information Meeting for May 7, 1979. STAFF UPDATE - APRIL 30, 1979 Our office has not received the soils report or the septic test report for each of the four lots. Preliminary approval cannot be given until the staff has had the opportunity to review the septic report. Please review the Engineer's letter of April 20, 1979. He reconmends in place of a culvert at intersection of plat road and Watertown Road that a bituminous apron with a swale be installed. i i RoneiUoa, HoUnm, Andefdik & Auooidtu, ^hc.QoHlidUm^ A335 it/m ^^unA jiVpAmny Jtf ^ PomA MUmmuU 95/13 Pko0m: 636^600 «[. Hi r Otto G, f 0M#jif»#« M. Rohtfi W, M0semt, M. ioufk C. AmderWL PM, Mradtori 4. Ltmbtrz* PM, Robtft D, Prigcard, P,E, FicharA C. Tutntf, PM, iamts C. OUam. PM. #471 April 20, 1979 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 Attn: Jean Mabusth Re: File No. 139-471 Sunny Knoll Dear Jean, We have reviewed the Sunny Knoll plat prepared by G. R. Coffin. We have discussed the culvert under the proposed street at South Watertown Road with John Gerhardson and feel that a bituminous apron with a swale at this location would be more acceptable. If you have aiqr questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, B(WESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. t00wftiu€ P. FHdsUm, PM^ CUm M. Caak. PM, KeUk A. Cardan, PM. Thomm £. Sayt$. PM. MUhafd W. Paster, PM Raben C. Sehumkkt, PM. biarwm L. Sanmim. PM, Damald C. Rmriardl, PM, Kemmetk R. Meister, PM, Ckarln A. Eriektam Ua m. Paneltky Hartam H, Oliam CCA Glenn R. Cook GRC:li CVTC. 23 VS(W Of OROHO I i TO: FROM: Planning Comnlsslon and Council Jeanne Mabuath, Asst. Zoning Administrator J1 M it DATE:November 1, 1978 SUBJECT:#435 - Richard Perry, Jr., 440 Willow Drive Variance & Conditional Use Permit Variance - Side Yard Setback (Zoning District RR-IB) Mr. Perry plans to construct a 22' X 24' garage five feet (5') from the southern lot line. The hardship claims arf> narrow lot width (82.5') and extreme grade of slope from middle of lot to the western lot line. Conditional Use Permit - Work Session The applicant proposes filling shaded area on diagram with an estimated 200 wublc yards of clean fill creating a level area for driveway, lawn and plant5.ngs. Hardship claims are extreme slope and hazardous driveway conditions In winter months. Staff recommends the applicant furnish an engineering report noting existing grade and proposed grades after fill, the effects on wetlands to the west and drainage area to be reviewed by the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - NOVEMBER 13. 1978 (Variance Request Only) Planning Commission recommended approval of Richard Perry's variance application for a 5* side yard setback. The applicant stated that it would be impossible to make the necessary turn for entering the garage If the building could not be located closer to the side lot line. The hardship claims were the narrow lot width and extreme grade of slope to west of lot. Planning Commission requested Council action on the variance application at the November 14, 1978 meeting because of the Inclement weather. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - NOVEMBER 13. 1978 (Conditional Use Permit) Work Session - Mr. Perry reviewed the proposed filling project along the western edge of his property and estimated that he had filled 100 cubic yards without a permit. The Building Inspector Issued a stop work order and required 50 cubic yards be removed from the fill area. Planning Commission requests an engineering plan for the project consisting of existing grade, proposed grade, amounts of fill, and City Engineer to study the effects on local flowage district. I November 1, 1978 Richard Perry, Jr, 440 Willow Drive Variance & Conditional Use Permit Page 2 #435 STAFF NOTE - APRIL 30, 1979 Staff regrets the delay in bringing this application back for action but an evaluation of the site by the City engineer could not be ^de until this past week. He recommends ditching to alleviate a ponding area caused by the fill. Staff locates the ponding area on the applicant's property. Mr. Perry has stated that he plans to correct the problem with additional fill and grading. He plans to fill in the same area with an additional 50 to 70 cubic yards of fill. We foresee no problem as long as the existing drainageway along Willow Drive is not affected. Mr. Perry has been informed by the MCWD that a permit will not be necessary for this application. The following points should be covered in your recommendation: 1.Set limit on additional fill to be allowed - Example - 70 cubic yards (7 dump truck loads) 2.Proposed grading to remove ponding area to be reviewed by staff on site with applicant. 3.Hay bales to be placed inraedlately to prevent silting and to remain until project is completed. 4, Set completion date for project, sometime this early sumner and require an Inspection by staff. % ✓ I I : I I i * / February 13# 1979 #435 City of Orono P«0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, HN 55323 Re: Richard W, Perry Jr. property 440 S. Willow Drire Long Lake, MN 55356 In regards to the concern about the wetlands area lying west of the Perry property, I have analyzed the filling to be done by Hr. Perry on his land. Prior to the filling, runoff from his land entered a ditch along Willow Drive, drained under his driveway through a culvert, and ttien continued through • culvert under Willow Drive to the wetlands west of his property. His proposed fill­ ing will not alter this pattern of drainage since the ditch and culverts will remain undisturbed. Because of the proxiaiity to the wetlands, this filling was also looked at in regards to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Dis­ trict requirements. Since this filled area will be replanted with grass and trees, not hardcover, the runoff factor will re­ main the same as that prior to the filling. Thus the quantity of runoff wi|;l not be changed. To prevent silt from entexdng the wetlands, a oovpl9 of hay bales should be placed in the ditch during filling until the grass cover is established. If any questions arise, please contact me. Sincerely I Mark S, Gz>onberg, P.*^ n*. t of Survey for V, ?trry In the Southvert 1/4 zf Section 2-117-23 , Jr. f 4i0 'W • ti w* t1 i' Certificate of Si:rveyj ;l I hereby cortiiy that this is & tr*-e nrKj ccrrsct repreient-itlon of a sun-ey of the boundaries of: ^ Thtt pert of the Kcrth 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Northwest l/X of the fouthwest 1/4 of Sectlor. 3» T ovb - shlo 117 North, Rwrta 2? ofest of the 5th Prinelpol ‘ierJdian, oererlled ar. fcilcvs: r'0£lnnint at the Southwest cnr: c*r of ttid North 1/2 of the ?*orth 1/2 of the Northwest l// of the Southwest l/4; thence North along the »iest line thereof e distance of 19S foet; p- thenre East OArwllel with the South line of said North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the l.orthwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 to the centerline of the fomsr County Ko*»d; thence Southvcst.^riy alont, said cer.t^irllne to Its Interaeetlon with the South line of said ?w^rth 1/2 of the North 1/2 of trie Northwest l/u of the Southwest 1/4; tt* nee West alor.y f.-jid South line lo the ooint of l^ginninj, and P,/ T^»at part of the North l/Z of the Northwest 1/4 of th» Southwest 1/4 of Section 3, Tcwnshlr. 117 N'orih, ij»n"e 25 West of the jth Principal Harldlar., described as follows: Crsoericing et th-’ oolnt of Interrectlnr of the South line o'* aaio North 1,'^4 of the North- W'jst 1/4 of thu- Southwest l/i with the centerline o^ the fomer (N'-unty head; thence East al'r.r »-*id :-,outh line 247.i feet: thence North a dl8tur.ee i*' 115.5 feet to the pcint of beiTir.: ln£ of the lunc w> le described; thence'ccntlnuing iV'♦>. ?2,5 feet; thence west with n«id feuth line to said centerline; thence So.' w rlr ulor.g said centerllDS • • i;«- Vfst ^hxcuf'r th » ^ ‘ . 'r ir* or *•-yir:r5nf:» tr. . /.n.- 4 0^**i#ior o ...A ip-*♦( 1; cr vt -crt.* or cn.?ro-ch-.Kjr.ts. oolnt of le4;lr.r.in^,ptrbllfl srlc South line: thene# fill ti.er&cr. It eJees nct’rurrxrrt tc rhsw ct'’«r 1 •j ■ 1 •iWf J 'i; M » CiDC OS ORONQ - - • City t’yf Orono P,0. Vi6 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 Re: Conditional Use Permit Application of Richard Perry Jr, Location: 440 Willow Drive South, Long Lake Purpose: Fill placement in lowland on west side of property. Dear Ms. Mabusth: This will inform you that a permit will be required for the proposed work. The property will be Inspected to determine if any wetlands will be filled^ The applicant must also demonstrate that the existing drainage capacities will be maintained. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District Grei^ R.^aiGr GRJ/pcl andro So ftMt^oo, AnJUnlik 6. AuocidUi, Oho, 2S35 W, 7*mmA JkfUuof 36 Si, fimmi, MitmUoSa 65U3 PUtmv 636-4600 QomUttUnf QnftttmxA Off# G. loMffif*#. fM. . Jtofttff ilOMJIf* fX* i#i#fft C. Anderllk, PM, Bfmdtcfd A. Umb€fg, PM. Jloftrrf D. PfigmfO, PM. PkhofA r. Twn^f, P.E, /«#•#« C. OUom. PM, Imwftmce F, Fftdiim, PM, Ctemm P. Cook. PM. Ktkk A. CofUm. PM, Thootoi £. NofOM. PM. PkkofA W. Fosttf, PM, Pobeft C. S<humkkt. PM. Jkonrim L. Son/olo. PM, DomoUr Pm§»At. PM. Pemooik P. Mieklof, PM, Ckt •Ux A SrkkMom Lto Hi, PomkPy Moflm m. OUm April 23, 1979 City cf Orono Box £6 Crystzl Bay, Mn. 55323 Atto: Mr. Al Olson Re: File No. 139-435 Eichard Perry, Jr. ^ S. Willow Drive Dear JLl, We ha-re reviewed the filling of the low area adjacent Willow Drive on the Richard Perry property. The fill Is presently blocking drainage on the neighbors property In the trees south and east of the Perry property. Ditching should be completed approximately 50 feet north of the south line cf the Perry property to allow water to flow ^lest to the ditch on Willow Drive. The owner has not as yet placed the hay hales to control silting. If yoc have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BCNE?::3t00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. .7 Glenn R. Cook GRC:U ;rn 24 1979 CITY OF ORONO March 7, 1979 Gary Petersen 1340 Baldur Park Road Subdivision Page 3 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING - APRIL 23, 1979 (Cont.) 4. Existing buildings - garage and shed a) shed is within flood plain b) garage would require a front yard setback if it remains. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APRIL 23, 1979 Neighbors in attendance noted the plat would involve an incressp in traffic on a road that is badly in need of repairs. They hoped the City was aware that the lake is steadily eroding the road base and wondered if the City had plans of rip rapping lake side. If the City plans to acquire all of Baldur Park Road who will pay for the repair and the new construction of portion intersecting Lots 18, 19, 20 and portion of 21 (lots owned by Theodore Boer, Erling Johnson and Arthur Gunderson)? The Planning Conmission requested that the plat road be moved to the most mid point on peninsula and that standards for a City road be required. In realigning the road, the variance for 75’ lakeshore setback is minimized Lot 2 will have a corridor or lip running to the cul-de-sac to satisfy ordinance requirements. STAFF NOTE - APRIL 30, 1979 Staff was asked to check the legal access issue with the attorney. If the City plans to make the remainder of Baldur Park Road a public road, then the access issue will be resolved by the City. -If the roadway is to remain private, then the developer will be responsible for resolving legal access. The new plan meets the requirements set by the Planning Commission. Staff reconmends preliminary approval of plat subject to the following conditions being resolved: 1. Plat road - public vs private City engineer recommends public - What does P.C. recommend? r r March 7, 1979 Gary Petersen 1340 Baldur Park Road Subdivision Page 4 STAFF NOTE - APRIL 30, 1979 (Cont.) 2. Approval of three new sewer units. 3. Shed on Lot 3 to be removed upon construction of road. 4. Garage on Lot 3 will require a rear yard setback variance if it remains. 5. Lot 2 and Lot 3 will not be given setback variances. 6. Existing house will require lakeshore setback variance. HoiMM*, AnJUfUik & Auo<Uaie4,, 9iHe. A3S5 W. 36 Si. Po4ttf MtHmmtcfm 56113 /9,4mm/ 636-4600 Otto O. Benestroo, BJL, Kobert W. Bottne, fX. Joufk C. AndetUk. B.B. BfodtofA A. Ltmbtfg, PM. BobtH D. Ffiford. PX. Pichati E. Tufmer, PX. Jamtt C. OhotL PX. iMwrenct F. FilisUm. PX. Clftm H. Cook. PX. Keith A. Cordon. PX. Thomas £. S*oyes, PX. Biehatd W. Foster. P.X Bobert G. SehunidB, PX. Mar\ht L. Sontolm, PX. Donald C. Burgardl. PX. Kenneth Jt kteUter. PX. Charles A. ErUkson Uo hi. Pawetsky /Tarlan M. Olson April 23, 1979 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 53323 Attn: Jean Mabusth Re: File No. 139*466 Plat Review Gary P. Peterson Dear Jean, We have reviewed the plat of Gary P. Peterson prepared by G. R. Coffin. The development of a 40 foot cul-de-sac right-of-way is not adequate for a cul-de-sac of this length. We would recommend that the turn­ around be moved south and the lot configuration be modified to acconno- date this change. The surfaced portion of the cul-de-sac should be 45 feet with the right' of-way being a minimum of 50 feet. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:li I. t / f i / J =5 I i 8 ...J land use planning ZCNING VARIANCE APPLICATION EXHIBIT 1 CITY OF ORONO Cry»fl Bay, Mlnnraota 35323 *23-7357 ^eacrlb* your rrQuo«t"**^lncL»^l*»'** '*i«**^ ?' ®t»>«r Infomatlou to better 7 ur requoat. Inecnpletr •ppllcetlone will net be ecerpted. £47 6. LIST OF EXHIBITS PROPERTY ADDRESS X//t'). . Legal de.crlptlou ahall be ahown on attached Survey, tjAihit 3-------- applicant r.„,-c ^■criptioq TnitU! AopUemtit^ BUJt Include; ________ Phone ^ ^6/ U X U t( Milling Addreta ^f< P /4 l< /\4> Appllcitfon Fora Property Owncra Llat Ccrtlflcita of Survi If Applicant ia not ownarg axplaia ^ tl t rr f i r,r 7^ c /jK/nbi^S^ OWNER Ki«e A / flllh :siri,4 __________ Phono ^ ^ Cl (4 X U <i__________ T"^ v/v< Mailing Addroaa </ (? A V f k//1 C#L Too Rocolpt # Oato Rocclvod ■y Staff Inferoatlon nat flap Date Property Acquired (Honth/Ycar) I (do) (do not) also ovm other adjacent parcels of landj 4. AGENT ^___________rhona c/ a j uU Inventory Staff Connenta rii» c/i>*< C^c Itellliif Addreaa Other Tnforaatlen 7 j 2' n».v- (>/ lU'JC 4-'/' /4t < SSt! l7 /> I ^ 5. NOTICES Should ba aent ta: _ ^ Applicant _____Omar ______Aganc PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT P) / 7. PRESENT USE ■••l«lentlal (Other) ___________________________ • • Vacant Land'_____ Vacant BullJlng(a) ?( Occupied Bulldlng(a) 8.DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST — aatabllab naw uae ^ continue or eapand oalatlng uaa £<! build new _add on _rcnodal _raptaeo Describe request in detail: 'fr' hn}U A^!<. <.>gr j —— / ~ ^ —iyi ■ft'r n\ li ^ oj)^-L ct/(y. f7c/t ‘/^rC_____SL^lJ ~t> ^ l/a" I* I ^ h’^tfK O* r/V i "f" Te j^ isStfr ^ ^ ' r i<dc ^fi,S^ Sm VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED to do the requested Vofli: lot Aroo I^t Width «_«_ Merdec^or Front \Ast4m J,__Bear) Other ny-/ fJ-i / d i** f ^ I'C |Sothoek C -h> - lOe D©SCiril>0 UNUSUAL PROPERXY CONDITIONS ptoveotlag conpllanco «rlth Zoning Codo rc^ulrcmcnto; j/\/ C/c/-/ <w/ f S fr, ' ^ ^* f n V /• f r / V ^ ri ^ A 11. Describe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY r.auitm. fro. atrut «.foec«ent of ,oMn. regulatlona }, . 2^ f fj_-------U ny r.’ ,,ri r/A f ^ 4. •^<* /^r., ,.4 b/pciriay ;/✓ pan 12. Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK on nettfOmrlna .r„e,.le. aud _______g- V t L ----i^'er^l c/r\ct/tjj^/' fidii'in-yU I T/ ^ i ■( t t ■k~\M - / V X ‘ ' r - ' j —( i ilf ------Pi't ft i r-k Y () A ! ft t S tty n/jg/><•//«»<»<-/ ^he PROPE3lTy OWNER oust sign and date this application. .‘■'r**** *“'•*» ••^n-elod!.., ond*a.r — to thl. .ppllccw«'ys,r-5::i:rj;r.r5‘Ji^r=Lss-“LK:r' aunnilod la true and eorrlTTtn ^ ho^t‘nf Ma*fal^iSg«: CT^l^lMTTlMo'ngSnr*** •** Applicant*s Signature Date ^/■veax,. [Xhier*s Signature Dste^Vft^j^L^* /y?f EXHIBIT 1 LIST OF EXHIBITS Appllcattoq Aiat Include: I Application Fora 1 Fropcrty CWncrs List S Certificate of Survt 5^. A^^ipt # ^SJLj Date Received 4*^^3^^* ■y Staf^^n f orna t ip^ n«t H*r »f land ! ) uU Inventory Staff CoBiDentR M? tent CTION COST $4r^(7ri ••• -- •• >—0<«l __ raytoM <r//>/■<. /7 ffad-fc^ <>/■ A* 'Sif T ^ f*, 't' 4 ^ f(fS l«t W14tk Nardeover Ifi rs 9 4 iJ I d f' ■h>‘ IS'' ce vltli loning Code repuiri ^ Ccx f i .r,. - rfitt: rautting frtm atrlet enforcraent of toning < <.* tv r /t ♦ xi" __S' • ^^ c S ^ i- a /V p^n >t« thia a^lication. irleoe vnoMM^le eStw^nntn f ' ^ ■Mnltentn, ngeneg. enMiggim di&g v< •*CS»« 'W'- / - ^ \ l^l i i . 7^ i I T department of finance A-603 government CENTER MN 55487 pteERTY Owners list #476 0u3tO NAME Bssnsas ADDRESS -------------------------------- wcoi,wiri -QHjzJlvd - 'z.'h ■Iliak^opoA^ v\------Y, e-lTeu^M c« EOT I BIK. I PARCFI Qp^ sx » I 60 OO Sol ^ QrOlOO ooS I U ^ C. ^ jn«».\ve\d j-------- II I t. I So oon-^ oo-vi^ :X\vJ r^oAi 6S3c^ OO-^, —iVXiog^N fvW e- A O V^c> o -L A Jjry^^ oys^to ^V<.J ClV n^v -A :?:®0 -^^?T«JDy:S^%^ c5o_^V ajt « ^V SS3 ^C.W ___ vx^v. ss<^o-7 S^^Dt»»5iA e> Vi__ u'S'i'O -"Vtt^ a\»* o \a. SS-»-q.f oo^(^ 000“^ Ll_loo \j^ li I _9SLi £ j-*^ I OO I fg_ Ooo fjr.l I entry that tha f«cH a^rMcnM this CSflHlcsis SfS HI SCCUfSI#' ***^tnis rtprtsantatfon of lnform» two ht It appears faws slrts uii Hw i»co«h o« tlw Kma. c^ FiMnM Wv^ to iht SmI'qI my inowliair »ndb«l«r. 0 1 g>t> \ T. S| %0 laUl> vj^ *-« ; 0) = w = g^io)-*: 0)*S ^:i SJJ“£ tcn ,10 Si?.d5^!rx )4 CITY OF ORONO EXHIBIT 3 LAND USE PLAIWING ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY VARIANCES REQUIRED Zoning Use District DENSITY mwiKVH actual VAP]KMCC CCJOI SICTlQtj Lot Ki»m lAt VliOl •7P,d3iSfz. }lAd' 3^0' _% SETBACKS Str««t Irtonti KIKIKUK fUjOumg P^JSTTNC,'*?4 COPE SIC7IOP fl4« tSixxJif’3^3 4. / ^2.b‘ jsrTjt Acar ■1«9. 1-0 Biaf. XA«cs>»Of •?s rt. 26 rE. hardcover LOT AKER jaJL, Sili--------- F£P.*aT7£» HAJIDCOVUI 9.1._____________% DTISTIKC KAADCOVOI •jJU _______ FPOPosa> kxaocovca _______ TOTAl, VXAIAAK * __Jt CODE SICTIQ 31.«n 9tAM O loko O loka 7S Laka 2S0 Laka SOO 26 75 250 500 1000 Ft.. OH Ft. OH Ft. 25H Ft. 30H Ft. 35H 54.202 54.202 54.202 54.202 OTHER SECTIONS mwiMa PClSTDiC FROFOSIS VkkIIOtCE CODE SECTIW OiiilOiaf (Baa.! FaakiJPf iMiJi. I ' f ■ *% UA OF ORONO f\* 11 T T1 t »T* ^ EXHIBIT 5 LAND USE PLANT^ING ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY >T j- VARIANCES REQUIRED EV^^ DENSITY lAt kirnm lot wiaOi SETBACKS w)M)Kuw yyjoy vrb actual ________ ^Z Sit&F -jp.d 3J /tA6' t%6‘ VXI* 1 AvWCt ^ ironing Use District ruDi sic7i_C2f % ^.IKIKUK AljpUlHCT CyiSTIJgC.f»»«OPC?SCl>VAAJWICI rOQC SICTloa Slr«ct ffiontl fS«€ ___ ____rS-ji*— —/<r' __ L«ar Biaf. Biaf* l^Le s>»or« hardcover 75 Ft.. 74 FL. LOT AJUCA JIML •ii.s______ F£R.-JTTI» KXRDCOVCA tJL_____ DrisTlxe KXiiDCovrai • ,f._____ JS rAOPcso> kxadcovea S ____ TOTAL VXAIAXCZ ji f^x.-------* C03t StCTiq Si.Bit tttld 0 -24 Ft.od ------------------------34.702 Lako O -7S Ft.OB ---------------------------- _34.702 Lako 7S -2S0 Ft.7SB __________________M.>n Lako 2S0 -SOO Ft.SOB ...-------------------------34.202 Uako SOO -loop Ft.SSB_________________— OTHER SECTIONS Buiiainf immm.} FarkiJftf CMifi.l keopiaoi tDClSTZm PA0F05CD VJmiAHCC CODC SLCTiag. LAND PIVlSIOMs plat AVAIIABILITV. lot./p.fC.i. !•» unplatted a Sola/parc«l» par aMlicalloi vacant occupiad aaaia owncrahip TOFOCMFHT Includaa ______ mlmmp alopaa J*i*ujry 1. 1975 Ownership y_ _tingle trptrate_ _ _cor^>^ed with other ptreele no! 1 ____ laVcaLora ^atlanda _____ high sremnd laval ground _____ roiling «^xidad araaa ^ Ir unuaual inilldin9 location •«pa. at a o^T>cf akip In this opplfratlcm ktllo opan CECKlIAnfy affactlnt appl^tlont ------- lot alia/ahapoi J|4, conaiatant ACCESBi_____aaiptinf unuaual lot ahapa inconaiatant witSi nal9>.ljorhood davalopnant city _____ cx>unty/atata_____privata OTi«TiEs7~Clty .e-«r _v£ .v.ll.Me cor^.c..4j City water --------- .v.ll.hla _ ••ptie eystM _____ new picpoeod — land use aaiatlnf conforvainp ___ connactad axiatlny aubatandard _ axla in9 non-confominp tuh>ct lot !•_____v.r.nt . ocruplod OC1S72B6 LAKD USt cor^^rad to aoning uaa diatxicLt . confonslng uao paOPOSAL affaetja pri/»clpal _____ acraaaory building or uaa X.conditional uao nofi-confonaing uao STRUCTURES OlITlJiG BUILDUP Daficiancioat _ paOPOBAL TFfSf do f«ot rooply witli aoning parforvanca atandarda yavi g Kiirf-iin flrtUy----; antiraly IW building or uao ^ raviau aa inM building or uao |cost aaraada SOS FHV| _____ raviau aa DCFAHSIOP of ooiating Icoat laaa tban SOB P#IV) ^ _____ Calating building FAIB nAMET VAUS fyrl ------------ f______________ ^ _____eUin not raduco an ojiiating aubatandard yard dinanaion TAXES & ASSESSMENTS PBOPumr w. y aroLota/Parcala o«mad in _____ _____ gjULCSi __ oro PAID currant __ aro DeLmaOEirT to yaar ara not lagally coabinad for taa ^rpoaaa* Aaaaaaaanta Laviadi Sa^dar fno|unita Walar |no|unita I^ITY OF ORONO LAND USE PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMhJENDATTONS Page 1 PREPARED FOR: iv.,.,____L?_7-1- #4-1 a Guunell fWcting |Dal«| By. _________'iCr.e. ■ QV u.sg._T^!^ (Stain APPLICATION REVIEWED BY: i 7 city Adminislr»tor • • City Attorney City Engineer Village Planner Zoning Administrator Planning Conmisslofi Park Coftnitsion Public Works Coordinator __ Public Safety Director Finance Director building Inspector Septic Inspector (<»«taa) /L^AjJ._3A|_LSL35- Hennepin Cty. DO? Minn. State DOF Kirm. ONII MCWD LHCD (dates) SPECIAL COMMENTS drr>^T STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPAOVC application as eubnitted APPPOVC epplicstion subject to folloelfig conditii table application for edditioneX infonaetion DOiy application for reasons rtotad above EXHIBIT Page 1 A7« 7^ iL Hennepin Cty. DOT Minn. State DOT Kinn. DNS HCWD LHCD 19 LAND USE PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS iTV’ fi J' i111 /Tt SUGGESTED FINDINGS y n>e apeela] conditions applying to the atructurc or land in question are peculiar to such property or ifinediately surrounding proi^erty and do not apply generally to other lend or strucluiea in the district in «diich said land ia located; OK lha conditiona applying to the atructure or land in question are not peculiar to such property or irmdiately surrounding property but do apply generally to other land or airuclurea in the district in ohich said land ia located. The granting of the application ia _ _ _ is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of o aubslantial property tight of the applicant. 1»1« 9rantin9 of tJi. proposed verienc. «rfll not In «ny w.y impair the public health, safety, comfort, norala or general welfare; CM The granting of the proposed variance soy impair the public health, safety, comfort, norala or general welfare. The granting of thf proposad variance will not be contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan or the Zoning Code; OR The granting of the proposed variance would be contrary to the Intent of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan or the Zoning Code. Tha 9ranting of auch varSanca will not Mrcly serva as a convenicnca to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviata demonstrated hardships or difficultiast <W Tha applicant has damonatratad no reco9mi«ed hardship or dif* -olty snd therefor, the 9rantin9 of each variance would Mrely serve ae a convenience to auch applicant. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Ajl 4. 35k lA. I ra c. 3_ _ _ 3 ~J H■ -4 — —^5»a V*. J» 3 «s^ »-^ Ok & 1 P O 3 V* !f> 1^ O o \^K \ -Sie I ! I Zb« jm X “r Cj L-^ av/j;pH I ' 4*.^/;J.n^ Or II \' o' fc /3 7-i kl I f\ \K (k ■;? 0 7k 41 •o“i*l m fw O :( #v ^ r- ow • • :: S3 ii February 13, 1979 H.R. Johnston 925 Willow Drive South Subdivision Page 3 n PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING - APRIL 23, 1979 Planning Commission must resolve the following issues before preliminary approval; 1.Plat Road - private roadway serving three (3) residences: a) 5-ton capacity gravel surface b) Cul-de-sac at end of plat road with a 40' radius c) Underlying easement to be acquired by the City d) Private road easement of 16' running through Lot 2 to be moved further south affording required 26' from wetlands. 2, Existing Garage: a) Recognize as legal non-conforming use or b) require variance of 35' of front yard setback. 3. Wetlands - applicant enter into a Conservation and Flowage Easement Agreement with the City. 4. Soils overlay map will not be available until the meeting night. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APRIL 23. 197Q butting Willow Drive. The Corwins were under the impression that the would continue to their west property line. Staff advised iLly creaie^lofs?'' required the road to abutt each of the February 13, 1979 H.R, Johnston 925 Willow Drive South Subdivision Page A #45*7 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APRIL 23. 1979 (Cont.) The application was tabled subject to Mr. Johnston coining to an agreement with Hendel Estate 1. New access site at Willow Drive to be obtained. 2. Width, length and placement of road easement to western property line from cul-de-sac to be determined. a) width - Planning Commission requires a 50' easement b) length: 1. cul-de-sac at original garage site 2. cul-de-sac at Lot 2's driveway further west 3. cul-de-sac at edge of west property line c) placement - Planning Commission requires 26' from wetlands STAFF NOTE - MAY 1. 1979 The Planning Commission Chairman and staff have agreed to bring a late entry, the H.R. Johnston appl'*cation, to the May 7, 1979 meeting because of a very brief agenda. His enclosed letter reviews his position and reference is made to some form of agreement with the Hendel family. I have not received the soils report but that need not hold up preliminary approval of the subdivision. Staff has reviewed the septic test, the inspector finds no serious concerns. His report will be ready for our meeting night. The applicant has^ asked for various considerations that appear to conflict with specific ordinance requirements and current policies. We will review those points sited in the letter: 1. Entrance Location A. Applicant - continue using existing one until fourth house is served. B. Policy - If more than two homes are served a different review standard is applied. City Engineer states driveway should be moved further north. (See letter of April 20, 1979) IL. February 13, 1979 H,R. Johnston 925 Willow Drive South Subdivision Page 5 STAFF NOTE - MAY 1, 1979 (Cont.) 2. Road Outlot A.Applicant requests a 30' width for plat road also road easement through Lot 2 be 30'. B. City Policy: 1. 2. 3. 50' outlot for plat road serving more than 2. Existing 16' road easement through lot 2 to remain until future development takes place in western lots. Planning Commission has requested a 50' outlot for road easement to western lots. 3. Setback Variance from Wetlands -* Applicant will require a variance because of bam location and need to position driveway to Lot 2 and road easement. How much of a variance would Planning Commission allow? 4. Cul-de-sac A.Applicant f>.els there is no need for one as long as three or less homes are being served. i B.Current Policy and State Law states that it is every municipality's responsibility to ensure that emergency vehicles can serve each residence. In this case a cul-de-sac may not be the best solution. We will ask the City Engineer to make a recommendation. RoneiUof^, RflUif, AntUnlik & AuociateA, 9iHC. ’23S5 W. ^lumA 36 SL Patti, MlmtaiaU 55ffS Pftottmt 636-4600 Otto C. Bontttroo, PJ[. Pobtrt W. Kosrne, PS, Joseph C. Andertik. P E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.C. Hohert D. Frigaard. P.E. Kichord £. Turnte, P£. James C. Olson, P,£, Lawreoee F. Fetdsien, P.E. Glenn B. Cook, PJ^. Keith A. Cordon, P.E. Thomas E. Soyas. P.E. Richard W. Foster. P.E. Robert G. Schmmieht, P.E. Marvin L. Scrvalm, P.E, Donald C. Burgprdt, PJE, Kentseih R. Meisser, PJE. Charles A. Ericksnm Uo M. Paweltkf Harlan M. OIsm April 20, 1979 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 Attn: Jean Mabusth Re: File.-Jio. 139-457 Plat Review Harrison Johnson Dear Jean, Ve have reviewed the proposed Subdivision by H. R. Johnson as pre­ pared by G. R. Coffin. The roadway alignment should be altered to extend straight east to Willow Drive. This will Improve the exist< ing sight distance problem. The roadway should be provided with a cul-de-sac in that more than 2 properties will be served from the private roadway. If you have any questions, please contact this office Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. //^; w.-IL C .(_ Glenn R. Cook GRC:li CITY OF ORONO mts^uli .1 . ( y THE JOHNSTON COMPANY Hay 1» 1979 To the Hembers of the Orono Planning Coinnission and the Orono Counci I #457 RE: SUBDIVISION/VARlAHCE REQUEST BXKRlSOW R. JOHNSTON. JR.. 925 WILLOW DRIVE Dear Members: I would like very much to bring the above to a workable conclusion as soon as possible so that I am In a position to: I) offer our present home for sale an^’ 2) build a neW( smaller home on part of our property. I fully understand your Interest in seeing that my present plans and any future plans for our property (and/or the llendel property to our West) comply as sensibly as possible with Orono's building and subdivision requirements. Over the past several months, we have had the necessary surveys, soil tests, perk tests, etc., performed and everything is In order. I have talked with the Corwins and Bormans (and they, in turn, with Mrs. Hendel) and they have agreed to abandon the present easement to the Hendel property jn exchange for a new easement which uses our present road and its extension to reach the property on wliich wo plan to build. Here's what I hope yoii will approve right away: 1^ property may be subdivided iiilu lv<o or more lots subject to positive septic, soil and perk tests and the two "hard acre" building restrictions. 2. The present road and its extension to the west edge of Johnston's property may be used to serve the home(s) built on the Johnston property. 3, The present road and its extension to the Hendel property shall be within the borderp of a 30 foot Out lot granted by Johnston. h, A variance shall be granted Johnston near the wetlands north and west of Johnston's bprn in order to be able to extend the present road to the west edge of Johnston s property. 5, As long as three or fewer homes occupy the present Johnston property, a temporary or permanent cuWde-sac need not be constructed. Approval of'the above will enable us to go ahead with the plans we've been working on for several months. I i I Iu ^ i 1 < t * * , To the Henh»rs of the Orono Planning Commission and the Orono Counci I Page -,2-May 1, 1979 With regard to the suggestion that I consider changing our driv^ay entrance to ®JJ® the beauty of our property. All of the above Is'premised on the fact that Orono's zoning for Johnst<^ and Hendel properties will not be changed or down-zoned at some time In the future. Very sincerely, H. R. Johnston, Jr i • . • 4 r • ^ fi K h • ‘ • • • I / THE JOHNSTON COMPANY May I. 1979 To the Members of the Orono Planning Commission and the Orono CounciI #457 RE: SUBOIVISION/VARIANCE REQUEST HARRISON R. JOHNSTON; JR.. 925 WILLOW DRIVE, Dear Members: I would like very much to bring the above to a workable conclusion as soon as possible so that I am In a position to: 1) offer our present home for sale and’ 2) build a neW| smaller home on part of our property. I fully understand your interest in seeing that my present plans and any future PlRR* our property (and/or the llendel property to our West) coni|>ly as sensibly as possible with Orono's building and subdivision requireiiients. Over the past several months, we have had the necessary surveys, soil tests, tests, etc., performed and everything is In order. I have talked with the Corv^nns and Bormans (and they, in turn, with Mrs. Hendel) and they have agreed to abandon the present easement to the Hendel property .in exchange for a new easement which uses our present road and its extension to reach the property on vdiich wc plan to build. Here's what I hope you will approve right away: I. Johnston's property may be subdivided into two or more lols subject to positive septic, soil and perk tests and the two "hard acre" building restrictions. 2. The present road and its extension to the west edge of Johnston's property may be ysed to serve the honie(s) built on the Johnston pro|>erty. 3, The present road and its extension to the Hendel property shall be within the border^ of a 30 foot Out lot granted by Jolinston. <1, A variance shall be granted Johnston near the wetlands north and west of Johnston's bprn in order to be able to extend the present road to the west edge of Johnston s property. 5, As long as three or .fewer homes occupy the present Johnston pror>k;ft;, a temporary or permanent cul*'de'sac need not be constructed. Approval of'the above will enable us to go ahead with the plans wtr'»- ;--en working on for several months. li .!•»' Ii**“»'** . • .. . . . . .* *• * *• ••**♦*' i ‘t p V' • \.. >V To the Members of the Orono Planning Commission and the Orono Counci I Page -2-May I, 1979 With regard to the suggestion that I consider changing our driveway entrance to one more perpendicular to Willow Drive, I would like to defer that decision until such time as 5-7 homes liay occupy the Johnston and Hc/idcl properties. We have used our present driveway for over 27 years with safety. We believe it is attractive and an asset to the beauty of our property. All of the above Is'premised on the fact that Orono's zoning for the Johnston and Mendel properties will not be changed or down-zoned at some time in the future. Very sincerely. H. R. Johnston, Jr. TiiTiliiiiiiiilillfair . 1 I' i u -j I ^ J L f / TO: // Jeanne A. Kabusth, Zoning A<’.in ni st valor A rx 7 r. FROM:Michael P. Caffron, Septic System Inspector DATE;May 7, 1979 SUBJECT: Site Evaluation for Sc-ptic System v457 - Johnstc-n S\ibJivision LOT 1 -ilie lot contains the existing house, garage and tennis court. Tlie lot has not been tested for a secondary drainfield site. Condilit.n and location of the existing systems has not yet been pinpointed; however, the owner thinhs his Sifptic tanks are to the west of the house. U’ell locatic>n, te-nnis court, stcc-p slopes, and hardcovcr/pioperty line setbacks as well as a 75' wetlands setback combine to severely limit future expansion area on tliis lot. Tt is likely that the existing system is partially within proposed Lot 2. I woiild recommend that based on location of the existing system and the need for a useful expansion area, the proposed lot line should be moved to the \jcst. Pending a final determination of the location of the existing system, it may be necessary to change lot configurations slightly to preserve the 2-acre dry buildable requirement. 1 LOT 2 - This lot has been tested and would require a mound system or both the primary and alternate fields, 'fhe testing was done near the proposed easterly lot line which may change. Again, the existing system for Lot 1 may be on Lot 2 and lot line changes may be in order. There appear to be adequate soil typos and useful area for drain field to accommodate various house locations. LOT 3 -Lot has been tested and w , *ld be acceptable for a standard drainfield. The lot is severely limited by wetlands on two sides and in the middle, all requiring 75' setback from drainfield The house location could be a critical factor on this lot. A house located anj’whore except abutting the easterly building setback could severely encroach on the useful drainfield area. Without the pi'oper house location this lot may be unbuildable. !,!i ! jils SI ‘tfi »! l!’Wl •> mmMm H -;i|ypi»|5 i - V,'-^.rj=s:iu,3f :-j£5i:-?f3’ ?si*. - ?315• ixjiUt: i ’.-.?.! - ■■• ** . ♦