HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-09-1979 Planning Packetr . 1
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 9, 1979
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
1. Call to Order/Roll
PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETINGS
*^2. 7:30 P.M. M56 Wolsfeld I^ake Company, 1870 County Road Six
SUBDIVISION
3. 7:45 P.M. i?464 Kern Hoppe, 950 Sixth Avenue North - SUBDIVISION
✓4. 8:00 P.M. #448 James Lindsay, 2505 Kelly Avenue - SUBDIVISION
ACTION ITEMS
•i. #410 Popov/Polsson, 4080 Bayside Road - SUBDIVISION
6, #440 Wayzata Country Club, 200 Wayzata Boulevard - SUBDIVISION/
REZONING/VARIANCE
(e #462 Robert Watson, 2785 Shadywood Road • VARIANCE
WORK SESSION
Js, #447 Hussman Investment Co. (Schlee Builders), 3660 Shoreline Drive
P.R.D.
i4. #457 Harrison Johnston, 925 Willow Drive South - SUBDIVISION
.^0. #466 Gary Petersen, 1340 Baldur Park Road - SUBDIVISION/VARIANCE
SKETCH PLAN REVIEW
#471 Richard Raiche, 2901 Watertown Road - SUBDIVISION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
*^12. Meeting of March 12, 1979
13. Meeting of April 2, 1979
‘ jvj 9P . V
-___
•V-
USE
< /
Planning Commission and Council
Alan P. Olson, Village Planner
February 2, 1979
#456 Wolsfeld Lake Company
Brown Road & County Road 6
Subdivision
-V ^ -
x-.K.:;
•rt . ->•
•L- V
f :•
SKETCH PMN REVIEW
The applicant proposes dividing a 40f acre parcel into two lots
Lot A has a total of 2.3 acres and Lot B a total of 39.2 acres.
The original parcel of 40 acres was part of the Wolsfeld Lake
Company's land grant to the DNR. Lot A was excluded from the
transfer without City review or approval as required by State
Statute for all subdivisions.
Lot A meets all the zoning requirements of the district. There
is no wetland involvement. Staff recommends approval as proposed.
PLANNING OOHHISSION MEETING - FEBRUARY 12, 1979
•
Planning Commission gave conceptual approval of the proposed 2 lot
plat and set a Public Information Meeting for March 12, 1979 at
7:45 P.M.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION - MARCH 26, 1979
Staff recommends preliminary approval of the Wolsfeld Lake Company*
two lot plat subject to the following conditions:
1. Submission of preliminary plans from surveyor. Staff cannot sut»mlt
application to Council until preliminary plans are received.
2. Submission of septic test for Lot A or two acre lot.
-tt
/;
TO:Planning Conimlssion and Council
#4:6^I
FROM:Jeanne A, Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator
DATE:March 2, 1979
SUBJECT: Kern Hoppe, 950 Sixth Avenue North
Subdivision
.m?..-.... V,.. ./■ : •
SKETCH PLAN REVIEW mmms:'
Zoning District RR-IB
Mr. Hoppe proposes dividing 204- acres into five lots. Lot 1
contains the original house and appears to have no setback
problems. All lots meet the requirements of the Zoning District
The applicant must obtain a new access permit from the County
highway department.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - MARCH 12, 1979
Planning Commission gave conceptual approval to the proposed five lot
subdivision of Kem Hoppe. He was advised that an entrance permit
from the County Highway Department will be required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION - MARCH 26, 1979
Staff recommends preliminary approval of the five lot plat of Kern
Hoppe subject to the following conditions:
1, Submission of entrance permit from Hennepin County Highway Department.
2. Submission of required septic testing data for four lots - Septic
Inspector to inspect existing house's septic system.
J. Developer enter into a Conservation and Flowage Easement with City.
4. Plat road to be reviewed by City Engineer upon receipt of County's
report on entrance requirements.
41: ^4!:
Iministrator
•'irai
ive lots. Lot 1
ave no setback
the Zoning District,
t from the County
to the proposed five lot
;hat an entrance permit
required.
ie five lot plat of Kern
lepln County Highway Department
3ata for four lots - Septic
septic system.
d Flowagc Easement with City,
eer upon receipt of County's
mC5* «DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
Q
jc O ‘'' 3:
im tfoim.
\ ti
'ADDRESS
i
i ^hV' X/.<-/<•,{//j:.
i ^Icii mu , _______________
// /'
na^'NTtrC BA(i<
P, T- DESCRIPTION rj) ^IF/X
i rARCEl-;_|
____________________________..
.......
A^/ud(fjE^ci '{)Ci03^
., 0dOZ
OCPJ-
....6ca
U2i.66>^
rSfX/f(^q/iu-lwf/4 MO i.
ood
'//eg A.mauci^ ----------------iQm<iies^n\P(4J L
I cMtfy Ititt lh« facts rtprtitnitr
' omWi ctrtiftcst« arc an aecuratc"
and true fcprcicntstlon of informa*
dan a a II a ppe a rs tM» da le an tHc -
fccords of U>c Henru Co. finsnea
-------Pia .t fa dca t^ my Hnfm»c dc^
andbaitf.
Mtnn* Ca « Fi^oa
' V<S
% f/}Dpefa\
Md.
I . •
■V
Decc-mber 21, 1978
James K. Lindsay
2505 Keljy Avenue
Subdivision
Page 2
ff kr
> ♦
«
i S : t
, ••
J
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - JANUARY 8, 1979
Planning Commission gave conceptual approval to the proposed Kelly Avenue
Duplexes Subdivision. The following Issues were reviewed with applicant:
1. Need for an accurate determination of wetlands.
2. Issue of mutual dock vs three individual docks to be worked out with
staff.
3.Duplex on lot 3 to be recognized as a legal non-conforming use, applicant
to be aware of significance.
4. Question of lot 3 duplex being located more than 200* from commercial
district to be resolved.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION - MARCH 26, 1979
Staff recommends preliminary approval of the three lot Kelly Avenue
Duplex Company's plat subject to the following conditions:
1. Developers enter Into a Conservation and Flowage Easement with
the City.
2. Joint dock to remain serving all three lots because of wetlands
along lakeshore.
3. Duplex on Lot 3 will require a front yard setback variance of 29'.
\
;
1
■A
Prooosed Subdivision
for Kelly Avenue Duplexes Conpany
in Tract Af Registered Lund Survey T’o. 1
Hennepin County, Minnesota #448
V •. /........... /' • i's/X ' > ' sV W*- \ ^ ••■
i
/^tchon/
$CPM-
/C^are/fy
^
I J ^ • • • ■ t.•v.V bk*
•%
I '•
-4
b-
<-/ \ -.W^ \ • n \ * • I • * * I • . -1
StM i--
4.
t
I
I-
VI
C0«f
* '• J / / \lkj
s
VbI
vn
Ci
S
# •
y -.
^ ^ fbtrid
4«9oe'
• 'i
Dsscrlction:Tr^ot A, HeGist^rod _rund ourvey I'o. 1428, files of Registrar
of Titles, Jiennepln County.
Owner;Kelly Avenue L»upl«xep Coroany, 2505 Kelly avor.ue, Excelsicr,
Minnesota 55-'31*
Sun’eyorj Gordon h. Coffin, 3025 W,.tertown i-joud, Gong Luke, l lrnesota,
55356.
Top of coot iron Judl<rlel l^daurk, flush with cronnd, si
SB comer of Lot 16( Block 6» Tovneito of Laigdon Psrk.
BloTstion • 9^3*21 foot V.S.T.O. - 1929
Scale* 1" s ICX)‘
Date t 9 “23 “78
Gordon it. Coffin
Land Gurveycr and Planner
Long Lake, Minnesota
i
'•>Vib :;.:. t
m:
<■■■■.
\
.1
!
//
/I
//JL
^n\u
TO:Planning Commission and Council
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
DATE:April 2, 1979
SUBJECT: #410 Popov/Poisson Subdivision, 4080 Bayside Road
Preliminary Approval - Zoning District RR-IA
This subdivision application was filed on July 14, 1978. After a
work session held on July 24, 1978, Staff and Planning Commission
determined what would be required of the application before preliminary
approval could be recommended. A Public Information Meeting was held
on August 28, 1978.
In reviewing the Planner's memo of August 9, 1978, the following points
were sited to be reconciled before preliminary approval. My comments
are based on review of the preliminary plans enclosed In your packet
dated March 28, 1979.
1.Final Lot Line Arrangement - the three lots meet all the requirements
of the RR-IA zoning district. The survey has not noted the setbacks
for the existing structure but there appears to be adequate area and
no need for setback variances.
4I
2.Driveway Outlet (Filbrandt property Involvement) • The entrance road
for the first 170' Involves the Filbrandt property, they have approved
the plat as presented. A signature line on the final plat must be
provided for the Fllbrandts to sign.
3.Engineer's Review - of driveway, drainage, etc. (see letter dated
September 5, 1978).
The records reveal a rather hardline approval In considering the standards
set for this private driveway (factors - maximum use of 6 lots, steep
slope, drainage). Staff recommends a less restrictive Interpretation
and recommends adapting standards based on a driveway serving only two
lots (lots 2 and 3). If Popov divides his property Into smaller lots as
a result of future rezoning, then he will assume responsibility for an
improved access (24' wide road).
'
L
April 2, 1979
Pt’pov/Poisson Subdivision
4080 Bayside Road
Page 2
• . fr.M -:ac JL ■ y'
I 1«
Staff recommends only a 12' wide base road to serve the two lots
that will require an outlet of 30'. If we were to require a 24' road
then a 50* outlot must be designated.
4.Driveway Easement - 'flie City will acquire the underlying casements
for Outlot A.
5.Drainage Easement - The drainageway has not been designated on the
preliminary plans. We will effect the same type of casement dedication
as was done on the plat for the Farm at Tx>ng Lake. Sun.«''yor will
have plans ready for review at >tonday meeting.
6. Flowage and Conservation Easement - These have been designated on
the plan by drainage easements along the wetlands.
7, Park Dedication Fee - We recommend a single park fee for Lot 2.
8. Hennepin County Highway Department - to approve access only, not
Involved with drainage.
9. MCWD - To report on drainage plans. (The surveyor's report
is being sent directly to MCWD.)
We recomnend preliminary approval subject to the following conditions:
1. Private Driveway Standards:
a) 24' wide road - Outlot 50' width (Review Street Profile Plan -
Location Station 0 through 2).
b) 12' wide road - "Outlot 30' width (Street Profile Plan - Location
Station 2 through 7).
2. City acquire underlying casement for Outlot A.
3. Upon designation of drainageway, City to acquire drainage easement.
4, Developer enter into a Conservation & Flowage Easement with City,
5. Park Dedication Fee of $100.00 for Lot 2.
6.Approve subject to receipt of written approval from Hennepin County
Highway Department for access road and MCWD for drainage plans.
2335 W, *J>u*^ih €MUfiuuaif 36
SL Pa*4if Ml»ut^ioia S5ff$
ptumt 636-4600
i!’
ii
\\
\ :
Otto C P:*iett»oe» F.£,
Fcbert M’. FcuKt. FX»
Jeupk C Af.derlik. F^.
Bradford A Ltmbtrg, FJ[,
Filbert D Frigaard. F.K.
Ftchcrd £. Turner. F.E.
Jumes C. Oljon. F.E.
September 5, 1978
Mr. A1 Olson, City Planner
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323
tfifcvnff F. Fe*Ii*en, F.E*
CUnM F. Cock. FX.
KtiA 4. Car dam. FX.
Thcmu E. Setts. FX,
Rkkard W. Fatxtr. FX,
Fobert C Sekunsekt. FX.
Martin L. Seeta^. FX,
Dcnafd C. Burgards. FX,
Kf^netX F. Meuttr, FX.
CbzrWt A. Fr,eKaom
tee M. Fa^tUkf
Rstlam H, Olssm
Re: Popov/Polsson Subdiv. - #410
Our File No. 139-410, Plata #4-aX
Dear Al,
The existing driveway that serves the Poisson residence is very narrow with re
spect to a ’'private roadway” standard. The proposed extension in a northwester*
ly direction has a section of very steep grade (167.) and is proposed at only
12 feet in width.
If thye are a numb<»r of residents using a single access (in this case three,
with a future possibility of six), we recommend that it be treated as a private
’’roadway”. The criteria submitted for grade, width and sight-distance are not
consistent with minimum criteria for a private roadway.
The proposed extension towards the Popov parcel crosses a ravine area. Calcula
tions submitted by Mark Granberg from Gordon Coffin's office indicate that e
30” CMP culvert is adequate to handle the storm water from the ravine.
If this Joint driveway is to be considered as a private roadway, then minimum
criteria should include a 24 foot width, 8.0% maximum grades and adequate base
and sight-distance. This would require some substantial regrading and recon
struction of the access road. We recommend that additional design plans be sub*
mitted which would reflect these criteria. In addition, it would be necessary
to resolve responsibility for maintenance of roadway in terms satisfactory
to the City
ICX), RGBE^E/ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC
^ -S’ li. V
".f.
-;-r»
j:-'
I
r
71 Zil
J/u.MlNiri'ES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 28,**1978*^
Page 2
Hassel announced this was the tine and place for
a Public Information Meeting on Popov/Poisson
sxibdivision request, Olson explained the request
and stated he had the Affidavit of Publication
and Certificate of Mailing. Mr. Poisson was
present. No public comments were heard. The
Planning Commission was concerned about the
driveway surface and an existing erosion
problem. There was lengthy discussion regarding
the roadway as a private driveway and the need for
easements and/or platting as an outlet. It was
d^'clded that platting was definitely required
anJ that the road should be an outlet up to the
point where it veers west across the Poisson
property. The City engineer has reviewed the
engineering drawings, but we have not received
any written comments from him. Olson stated
he had received a letter from the MCWD
(dated 8-24-78) stating they had no apparent
problems with this subdivision, however, it is
subject to formal review by the MCWD at which
time drainage details would be required including
Justification for the proposed pipe size on the
driveway, ^ere was concern that the lot lines
could be relocated somewhat to omit or reduce lot
portions isolated by the road from the other
properties. McDonald moved to table the
application pending possible revision of the lot
lines, receipt of additional drainage information,
and receipt of reports from the City engineer and
County Highway Department. Motion seconded by
Hairanerel. Vote: Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion
passed xinanlmously.
POPOV/POISSON
4080/4010 Bayside Rd,
SUBDIVISION
Public Info. Meeting
MIO
7:40 P.M. - 7:48 P.M.
Hassel stepped down as Dr. Leach is a client of his
firm. Applicant was not present. Olson stated that
all requirements of the preliminary plat approval
have been completed. The proposal did include
consideration of a duplex on Lot 3, but final planning
has not been completed and approval of the conditional
use permit will have to be delayed. The park fee
has been paid on the basis of future duplex approval.
Hannah moved to recommend approval of the final plab
as per the attached resolution. Motion seconded bv
Hammerel. Vote: Ayes (6), Abstained (1) Hassel.
^tion passed.
THOMAS LEACH
2535 Shadywood Rd.
FINAL PLAT
#344
I
MINUTES OF A PLANNING C01«JMTSSI0N MEETING HELD ON JULY 24, 1978
PAGE 4
This item was reviewed as a Sketch Plan Review.
Both Mr. Popov and Mr. Poisson were present,
but only Mr. Poisson made any comments. The
Planning Commission noted that the area vras not
staked and the members had difficulty orientating
themselves to the proposal. Major concern was
the drainageway and how the access easement would _
affect it. Staff also stated they would need mor^
detailed topographical data before the engineer
could re^^lew the easement proposal and that soil
testing would have to be done on the back parcel.
This subdivision will also require formal platting.
Staff will review the Filbrandt property before
preliminary review.
A Public Information Meeting will be scheduled for
August 28, 1978.
This item was reviewed as a Sketch Plan Review.
Mrs. Hollander and Mr. Knutson, the engineer,
were present. They presented a new map biiowing
Lot 3 as having two acres dry buildable instead
of the 1.7 acres previously submitted. The
current proposal is to do the division in two
phases:
Ihase I
Phase 11
West parcel to be divided into eight
lots plus a remaining outlot.
East parcel plus the Phase 1 outlot
be divided into seven lots to complete
the division.
Discussion included the desire for a private road
with no direct access on County Road 6, a temporary
cul-de*sac and. an easement to the City of the
continuation of the proposed road throu^ the east
parcel. Mrs. Hollander proposed that the existing
rental house would eventually be Included in with
her lot and used as a guest house.
^^^POV/POISSON
4080/4010 Bayside Rd^
SUBDIVISION
(#410)
McDonald corrected the Minutes as follows: Page 1,
Paragraph 2 - Vote should read: Ayes (3), Abstained
(1) Wilson, motion passed.
Hannah moved to approve the Minutes as corrected.'
Motion seconded by McDonald and passed unanimously.
MRS. ROY HOLLANDER
255 Sixth Ave. No.
SUBDIVISION
(#412)
CORRECTION TO THE
MINUTES OF
JULY 10, 1978 MT6.
Meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.N.
1
February 1, 1979 rr ^Wayzata Country Club
200 Wayzata Boulevard
Page 4
N.*
38.650 P.R.D.; Site Plan The proposed site plan, inclxiding
location, spacing and basic design of proposed buildings,
street and parking plans, water and sewer (public or
private) plans, and plr^ns of open space available for park
or recreational purposes, shall be submitted for approval
by the Planning Commission and the Council,
After consulting with the Orono and Way^ata Planners, I have leaxned
that it is common practice, especially in the south, to use golf
courses for open space credit. Staff has no problem with this use.
STAFF NOTE - FEBRUARY 15, 1979
The first joint staff meeting will take place on February 22, 1979.
All agree before any action is taken that it might prove beneficial
to hold a joint Planning Commission meeting. Action on the application
should be tabled again on the February 26, 1979 meeting.
STAFF UPDATE - MARCH 29, 1979
Staff met with the Wayzata City Manager, Larry Thompson, and Tom
Anderson, Building and Zoning Administrator, on March 23, 1979 to
discuss Wayzata's concerns for the joint project. The Wayzata
Planning Commission and staff did not recommend conceptual approval
of the proposed P.R.D. The portion of land in Wayzata (1.3 acres) is
zoned for single family not for multiple dwellings. In planning for
the lands surrounding the highway, Wayzata decided against "buffer zone"
type development and went with single family zoning. For Wayzata's
part, this is not a unique eno.igh situation as it possibly' could be
for Orono. Their great concern is setting a dangerous precedent for
the rest of the undeveloped lands along the highway - a policy in
complete contrast with their comprehensive plan. The City has
reservations on the technical quality of the proposal. The grade of
the road is too steep to meet road specifications and will require
large amounts of fill. Plans for the units are still quite incomplete
and require more detail before a final determination could be made.
I*
dSiL
■•■I
It
February 1, 1979
Wayzata Country Club
200 Wayzata Boulevard
Page 5
/ f
/
t
/ ,
/• •
//
r
Orono should also consider the Issue of precedent setting. If we
accept golf course land to satisfy open space requirements for this
project, we would have to for similar proposals - swimming pool,
tennis courts, stables and plenty more golf courses. We will also
find ourselves dealing with improbable shaped lots. Check the
original site plan for project. How do you feel about this one,
especially if the golf course ceased to exist? Who should benefit
from open space lands? owner within development - neighboring
property owners? Who appears to benefit the most in this instance?
Review of Orono's Concerns;
Precedent Setting
a) Use of golf course lands to satisfy open space requirement.
b) Another rezoning request from RR-IB to R-IA (Summit Station
first rezoning request).
Variances required with proposal;
a) attached dwelling
b) rezoning
c) P.R.D.'s limited to sewered property
3. Consideration for Wayzata's position
s
M
« I im Mm]
tf-
TO:Planning Comniission and Council #432
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
DATE:April 2, 1979
SUBJECT: #462 Robert D. Watson, 2775 Shady\,?ood Road - VARIANCE
Variance - Lot Area and Lot Width (Zoning District LR-IB)
The applicant seeks permission to build a retirement home on their
adjacent lot of 28,000 s.f. The area for the lot with the existing
house is about 25,000 s.f. Both lots are under the minimum area
requirement for the zoning district. The City has maintained the
policy that when substandard lots are under common ownership, they
are considered as one lot. At the time of the original platting
of Pheasant Lawn, the minimum lot size was 1/2 acre. As of
January 1, 1975, the minimum lot size was increased to one acre.
The subject lot has a one-unit water assessment plus a footage
assessment of 100*. The property is sewered. Please check the
Chapman File #428 for a lot area survey of Pheasant Lawn area
(enclosed) and also the enclosed area survey for subject property.
The applicant states their position in the enclosed letter
Area Variance - Ordinance 34.452
Required:
Proposed:
Variance:
43,560 s.f.
28,800 s.f.
14,760 s.f.33X
Width Variance - Ordinance 34.452
Required: 140*
Proposed: 100*
Variance: 40*29%
ciiY 0? CrON'O, yrxirszsoTk
L=nd Use Application •
I^iC.-.TIO:; OF PSCPCSAL (or property)
Address l\OSi 3
m O'
#’#Legal Description ___________
* f •
APPLICANT •/' Tel' #_12 _Lii.
Mailing
Address
/
.AlZll_S’ ?
i,.^V>yj/’Ov/'/ /O. i/J. il- rJTel # V7/-/.'->OWNER Kai,
Mailing , •
Address ** v . ^
Kj
Present Zoning /■» /T— / ^ .
'iTPE CF REQUEST
__ Subdivision $1504§5/Iot
Conditional Use §50g)Variance §50
Pezoning §250
Riprap §15 (§65)
FEE JT6, aUl 6
Date Rec»d_A«Wta»?^
By Y^4_m
Present Use \/^ C/3 </7^
Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request * -
Specify Ordinance Requirements (!hu
»-ls r
Explain your request and reasons for same
y^>vuy6g ^_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. i
VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity
\<y Lot Area _ _ Setback Front_
Width
Side
Specify hardsh^s to propertvOLtf^ *** JC-J^
i (PoOy<-e^i^j/CKo
Other, explain
Rear
TYPE OF REQUEST
__ Subdivision $1504?5Aot
^^Conditional Use §50
tl^Variance §50
_ Rezoning §250
_ Riprap §15 (§65)
E <• atf d f
te Rec • d _Jtj- 4 ___
_______________________
\/ a Cja *jT
y r '
Rear
Pvs
UM_____________
^ ,-.i
?;■-12'
1
DEPARTt€NT OF FINANCE
A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
/ •
NAME
'/* > a / /- • -O' •C .
j^a£^ ^ __
^-y'. V .‘i/: /<>' ^
/2vgrjgy £>. /^i67SeA/__
ZffA5 * .i
i'
ADDRESS
• rr 'f ^y/
; 77t' -
477^'
p^.Lf,
DESCRIPTION
|-lOl2
2 I - (I 7 - Z 3
zi — //7 - 23
LOT
3 1
■y V *
_ y fc, .V.
pts M. I'96
Ri.'5 f9o 356
rls rJo 5oo
I etUffy Ihitihttdcts feprennna-----
on thts certiHcate are an acruratt
OoO Vae #4^f#aeT4atia»-of Jf'fofme*----
lion a& It appears this date cn the
a»co »ds-o l»Ut» Mean, —
Di/.. lu inc b;:s.of my
- M ~a _ ______________ _______________________ _____
0fvO U7UBI*
Henn. Co, Rnanco Livlslod
BLK.PARCEL
oooz
OC4Z]
oo4j^
0 04-
GO I
OOO
003
JJ, /y. ,-^0
j: V i; /'■ ,
r
r
^ i
I
•j
Approximafs Tvot Area Survey (See enclosed map)
Required Existing
Lot 1 43,560 s.f.26,069 s.f
Lot 2 43,560 s.f.25,669 s.f
Lot 3 43,560 s.f.28,059 s.f
Lot 4 43,560 s.f.27,120 s.f
Lot 5
•
43,560 s.f.32,850 s.f
Lot 6 43,560 s.f.28,801 s.f
(Subject Lot)
4*-^ A.
^ I
-> «t
' • •
1
ft’lv->:
^
L'v
\ ' f-f V-*, sf-
K^-
‘,iv'lfE;
•^i'i'O" Vte
f*,-;
A. t
r^t0M
r^-y.v '-31^
,^vW Va
1
2775 Shadywood Road
Excelsior, KM 55331
March 6, 1979 1
Kr. Steven Wilson
Chslrman, Crono Planning Coirjnission
Orono City Hall
Crystal Bay, KM 55323
i
Dear Kr. Wilson,
Cn April 9th we will be appearing before Planning Cofninlssion to
request a variance to build a single faiM,%! jence on Tracts B,C, and D,
Registered Land Survey A^358.
We have lived In our present home in Orono for almost twenty years and have
a close Identification with the area and concern for its future. We believe
our request Is consistent with this concern.i
We feel the following facts might be helpful in consideration of our request!
1.We purchased the lot fifteen years ago as a part of a long
range retirement plan; the purchasd was based on the Pheasant
Lawn plat showing it as a separate bulldable lot. We were
never notified of zoning changes that would not honor the
original plat; Indeed, It came as a coiq>lete surprise that we
would have to request a variance.
II.
1 B.
We have always considered and treated It aa a separate lot.
A. We were assessed for water on the basis a unit
charge In addition to the 100* frontage.
It has never been Incorporated as a part of our
present dwelling site; It has been left wild and
unmowed with hedge and evergreen plantings on the
side boundary to further emphasise the separafie
quality.
The lot has an additional 20 feet for dockage on
the lagoon (K,L in plat). This has been left open*
based on plans for future building on the let. Had
we considered the lot a.part of our present dwelling
sltq we would have sold the dockage area which is in
great demand.
The lot has been taxed as separate unit and never
incorporated with our present dwelling site tanas.
•it'"
C.
D.
III.The acreage is 28800square feet, approximately 2/3 of an acre,
with 101.67 lake frontage and the additional 20* for dockage.
It is consistent'in size with the other lots in the Pheasant
Lawn development and almost identical to the adjoining lets.
The acreage is more than adequate for building, respecting
all required setbacks; being sewered it does not require large
drain fields. It does not require a carving-up process. It
will not create an eye-sore but will be in harmony with exist
ing houses. Granting this request will not open the door for
a flood of variance requests; the whole Pheasant Lawn area
is almost completely built. Tnia request will not come as
a shock to the neighbors for they have considered it a
vacant, but buildable lot.
In summary, we purchased the lot as a separate buildaV.le site, have t\urned
down offers to buy it, saving it as a potential site for our retirement
home when our present home became too large for our needs. Through ne
fault of our own, the change in zoning has created a hardship situation
which cannot bo corrected without the variance request being granted.
We look forward to meeting you and the other members of the commission
and will be happy to answer any questions.
Sincerely,
“V aSjaKary Bob Watson
If ' '
h?.
w
i .
TO:Planning Coiximission and Council
FROM:Jeanne A, Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator
DATE:January 19, 1979
SUBJECT: #428 Ken Chapman Subdivision, 2695 Shadywood Road
Survey of Lot Areas Surrounding Kenneth Chapman's Subdivision
LOTS AREA
Applicant's
Proposed Lots 41,435 s.f.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
35,626
49,536
48,768
44,900
50,500
39,060
37,145
41,265
39,270
38,007
38,420
29,189
25,957
31,680
62,216
49,284
60,836
49,392
34,430
23,940
27,945
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s. f.
s.f.
s.f.
8 . f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
<cru€.u2
#42
I
■1
1
Planning Commission and Council
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
#447
April 5, 1979
SUBJECT: #447 Hussman Investment Company
3660 Shoreline Drive - P.R.D,
WORK SESSION - APRIL 9, 1979
The applicant presents a P.R.D. proposal of 28 units following
the standards for the existing zoning district (LR-lC-1). Please
review original five page memo for background. The plat road
will service 24 units and 4 single family units will be served by
Blaine Avenue. The developer feels this corridor of single family
lots will be an excellent buffer for neighborhood to the east.
We have asked for an additional 15' right-of-way for Blaine Avenue.
The access road is 60' wide at entrance but becomes 50' in approximately
50', Remember with a P.R.D. the road easement is not subtracted from
total area.
Ordinances pertinent to application;
34.620 Conditional Use Permit for P.R.D.
34.621 Additional Permitted Use
37.015 Density Limitations
Lot Configuration:
All structures appear to meet the requirements of the zoning
district. Surveyor has not designated setbacks for structures.
Lot 14 may have a rear yard setback problem. The four single
dwelling lots (detached dwellings) are not allowed under this
application.
Density Ratio:3 units to 1 acre
Total Area - 9.26 acres or 403,424 s.f.
Total Units - 28 units
a) Density variance
Required: 413,820
Proposed: 403,424
Variance: 10,396
-i
April 5, 1979
Hussman Investment Company
3660 Shoreline Drive
P.R.D.
#447 1
Page 2
b) Unit area requirement
Required per unit: 14,520 s.f.
Proposed per unit: 14,408 s.f.
Variance per unit: 112 s.f, or ,8%
Staff regards the area variance under the P,R,D,
as minimal upon review of Ordinance 37.015, The
applicant under this ruling could ask for a
maximum of 36 units.
Hardcover: (Review enclosed plat map)
Allowed 357. - 117,250 s,f,
(total area minus 4 single family lot areas)
Proposed - 72,039 s.f.
Park:
The Park Commission will be asked to review this project for a
possible park site. The Navarre Theater has surplus playground
equipment that could possibly be utilized by the City either in
a park for this development or in a nearby park site. The
playground equipment could be considered part of a park dedication
fee.
Access Road:
We will recommend that the plat road be considered a public road
because of its location within the urban service area. City
Engineer will determine specifications for public road. Staff
reconmends a 50' easement instead of usual 60* because of its
limited use (railroad to north, wetlands to west). City doesn't
plan an extensive network of City roads in this area.
Jt
m Wmmrn ■^wT
itewah
i . ' *If/
r
ft r'w 4:4;- /April 5, 1979
Hussman Investment Company
3660 Shoreline Drive
P.R.D.
Page 3
i
n ji.
Sewer & Water:
The City Engineer and Public Works Coordinator will be asked
to review the capacity of the service district to serve 28
new units.
Pond:
The proposed pond will require a Conditional Use Permit.
There exists an extensive natural drainage system right
to the west and south of the property.
» ■
Persons and Agents to Review Plat:
Hennepin County Highway Department
M.W.C.D.
Hennepin Soils Office
City Engineer
Public Works Coordinator
Mound Fire Department - placement of fire hydrants
Review of Variances Required:X
1, Variance for the four detached dwellings-Ordinance 34.621(c).
2, Variance for area requirement—Ordinance 34.621.
.i.
y
* •
i: •
z' . •.** * *• '• • •
‘’ •■•.:•''<iV‘ •\ \ ; ■ r .X<iv:\ V - •-* r;' r\ \ ••• *
V ^ A ..' t I*' - *''»\\xr ;V-
i *.. ^ • •:* •
\^ \ \ **■-/.u- •-*-
\
T .-I /. I •
' V \ . ••-' . . / " •■'. v:;; •
\ ' \ ■ '^ *-' .
' \\'. ■ ■ '>■‘h• ^ ^ M ^U\ «-.^. ; ^••..•^;[)
\*\ % ! ^‘*'
';\*.-i •I** » '.f
\
•/.•V % ■
; •■••v, • •o,...--
r--'>5
•• .. . ?.-.a>v.:>. z. r. •♦•,:(»• :\ A
s A'j % •
5 ■ ■:
r - V V - lVX. '
» • * «
- -Z
m
>
r ' , -,*v ■ H
te
fez-
§H|d
■ » "m?-
i .r; Ti. ST
»ft tij ’-
t <
l'*'
h
eueuw”^.
noBTuePi* 1 QMLQOAO
1
11R Y9jm
I
VttiA^ Of OROWO
HUS5MAM iNVeSTMEHT CO.
b r n'» •
r
/ /Q;
' 75
(j ■■3
TO;Planning Comniission and Council
FROM;Jeanne A. Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator
DATE;February 13, 1979
SUBJECT; #457 H. R. Johnston, 925 Willow Drive South
Subdivision
SKETCH PLAN REVIEW - Fred Herfurth. Representative
Mr, Johnston proposes dividing a 10+ acre parcel, located on the
west side of Willow (Nl/2, Section 10), into three lots. Each
lot meets the 2-acre (87,120 s,f,) minimum requirement for the
RR-IB district, Mr, Herfurth advises that the lot area calculations
are exclusive of the designated wetlands. It is Impossible to
determine if any other variances are required as lot dimensions
have not been recorded.
Access -the access road will be a 50* width designated as an
outlet on plat. The location of the access will be
where the existing private driveway is located. This
plat access will be reviewed by the City Engineer, The
16' access easement running through Lot B, serving the
Hendel parcel to the west, will be vacated. This section
of access easement will be replaced by the more southerly
located Outlet B. The 16* access easement through Lot C
will remain.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - FEBRUARY 26, 1979
Planning Commission gave conceptual approval to the proposed three
lot division, but noted that the road easement through Lot C must
be 26' from wetland. Planning Commission also asked that a lot line
consideration be made for detached garage on Lot A - must be 10' from
side lot line, A variance will have to be given for the front yard
because the road outlot cannot be moved with the wetland density to
the west and north.
->S'
■r'
February 13, 1979
H. R. Johnston
925 Willow Drive South
Subdivision
Page 2
JJ,
if * :
* •* .v>«3.3 1
WORK SESSION - APRIL 9, 1979
Lot ConflRuration - all lots have the necessary two acres of
dry buildable land exclusive of wetlands,
. B* Wetlands - designated by drainage easement. Developer enter
■ into a Conservation and Flowage Easement with the City.
C. Variance
1. Existing garage meets side setback requirements for
accessory structure but it will require a front yard
variance of 35'.
2, A variance setback from wetlands for the 16' road easement
to the west will be required if the easement is not moved
further south. It appears to be at the narrowest point 10*
from wetland but setback has not been noted.
Access Road - the plat road, according to current road policy,
is classified as a private roadway (serving 3 to 12 residences)
requiring a 5*ton capacity gravel surface. To be consistent
as we are requiring with the Peterson-Olson plat (Baldur Park .
three lot plat), we will ask for a 40' wide radius cul-de-sac
to afford servicing by emergency vehicles.
Public Information Meeting set for April 23, 1979.
Inarch 7, 1979
Gary Petersen
1340 Baldur Park Road
Subdivision
Page 2
//. /:i
WORK SESSION - APRIL 9, 1979
I have reviewed the Richfield Bank & Trust file and have enclosed
the original plat. Please observe T^ts 31 and 32 of Baldur Park plat
were not included. In comparing both plats you will note by including
lots 31 and 32, we have increased the buildable area. For this plat
when I refer to buildable, I mean the area free of the flood plain
and 75' lakeshore setback. There is adequate "dry buildable" land
(all lands located above the 929.4 contour).
Lot Confifturation ~ there is adequate buildable area for the two
new lots. A house could easily be built within the unrestricted
area that would not require a setback variance.
B.Access Road - This plat road would fall under a private roadway
classification (3 to 12 residences) requiring a gravel, 5-ton
capacity. A change in the approach is proposed and must be
reviewed by the Public Works Director and City Engineer.
C. Variance - The existing house will require a lakeshore Setback
variance. Survey must site actual setback.
Plat road (existing driveway) will require a 75*
lakeshore setback.
D. Public Information Meeting has been scheduled for Monday,
April 23, 1979.
E. Sewer - City must approve three new sewer unit hookups.
S' ci
.i I J<3
/J>^
' r
s V
. S
3a
• . \• •
\ /
' ^
V
A
*v>\\
•. '' •• ■ V * *' \ ' 1
. c v% .'i^v*'r':V.r\‘\)5 .V\\
'■ . A;5.^\<N
^ V ^ ' *• \ . •'^^•V' ’ A ‘ . 1 V • V. \
i\'v®::AV-nS• ;\Vj> :»\V'
' . .!.• f . .r*^. j
» *.• -.•* : .‘.I t* ! I* •* *rtji ’ *«■•• .»rnrt
. ,»i'*1 i . » . urw«‘, .'! *' ♦••i.-:.rt t » i» t«
,«tv. i’.i u !w»#jt ••i.li-* V‘ •
*. ?-• • • • • •* * ''•■ • *• • ’ * •*'•*'*
, • <» . rt‘ 4 :’ i l 'I • I ii I ’t» *!>'*••
j. . • . * I rt* ,.j* •• • * • .^ ‘'f ?• * .. * * : ••*
• ' ; i» »-*•'-•. •• •• *• • *. ♦' !♦»'
4 • . • •.! • • ‘ V k. *. r rArt*-': « '* •*••!;?
, 4 .. 4 , ••• .4* *. • * r*»vj U'flv
. J .. .4*„. • •. . - V. ‘ -ts*..- l* ‘*)
• «. » • 4 • • • •.-*!•• • •!*•-•*.• i4-'ri<
f«
V.
• f
t.
• 44*
*. •r 4 • » .•. f.i •• r ; •*iw t.r y
,4- • • • I .✓u** ••. l. r-•*
• •. . I . •* * ^ **• u.:r.i.:»4, »ii s.
*i»- . * • •* * " *• 44*: /r *. 4..CH ?..I *, I« V ••*
.j- '*4* 4 ’* • I • *••••’>.*•*•'• •»*-4i»u, ’•••ri • • r u* rl :r
.. . -r • I • ...' ! i*« • * ‘ *1. ^
. .. . », • •' * r ^ f J. ................ . • t •• : o • • v f* nr
-» • 4# ? , • Mi
4'*r:*4<. M r f •.».•! V -..r* »^v» .r!vw.; r»*«: % '*«»r » tiriu.*
’ *• .?• -i *• , * . I •• r i‘ :•• ** !«»1t •• •* ii. s rfc*-jvf,fiiV|
i, , *r . » • ‘ * • *"**•**• *»»rli*^i I*.!..* .14 Ut*M» it* U'f i., 4 1. I*!
f 4* 44^44^4 .••4.-4*»».44f
\ \ "■
V
• , • •
4 M* M
• 444
•f ,.l •4 . %. 4
♦ -tf
;
• ; V. * 4 •«. n* O' .“t. - \
4- I f* i-:« - • i» •' .1 .•* ;.: • tj
’•..1..4 *. 4^^’.,l ?« . • • ........................... all f. .4 • ■ < 4 lr;i
I 44, !rt U t- 4 I 4^*- c - *•• a -r .f ' 4 . *4 1
,4 • . I U. ; iC *Ucl I •►Lnl ;.. '‘a. l I 4 i» ••
• ,4, I. i. t. t - -4 JinVi.r «4. 4*V. 4. .1; if.ut,.-
*4.^* r** K* .* « Jii* • ••♦ *' 4‘*2 .^4 *»t »«»44 « r ’ *• I.Ja*l4-.-U4 . «*0» of VI II,
4' 41. * • • • r • t » •. • 4
• # . • I'l 4 • -f .......... .tl vi.in . : n. .-»*• i.i. it% r I I *hJ. .•» -01
* 4 — . . • »4f. 4 •. '**4-• • • **f »*r.rf , V» *1. I 4 r !lf4'*’ r ;«ri» • 1 .u U»- 4*5*^% .. »rlr,«jtr.
. Uf r 4.f .4». f ** * .K v- nr.-. .1.. t . vt.l^ r-f^. -r iv n
' rr ' ‘4r\ - '*f , *t* Ift.'ll* • -..4 ••.4ir-»i- I'lv - .• *♦.- *i» »• oImI.
^ . 4 rl .« 4 t I
• I r ':*■ I.. .* .
• . •
• * •' . r »•
4 •
♦At . » .* 4
•4 r .1.1
V4t. ... , ' tiu- c»oU
IHi^
.Ut;ft
1
I
i
M:
TO;
FROM;
Planning Commission and Council
Jeanne A, Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
#47
DATE;April 2, 1979
SUBJECT; #471 Richard L. Raiche, 2385 Shadywood Road
SUBDIVISION
Sketch Plan Review
The proposed four lot division was presented to the Planning Commission
in 1977, receiving preliminary approval on February 14, 1977 (#222,
Sunny Knoll, Ruth Wear Estate, applicant). The plans have not been
changed from the original proposal.
Review of Items to be considered;
1. Review of access road by John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator,
2, Drainage approved as presented on Engineer's plan for plat road.
3.Access road to be determined (private vs public). If private
than proposed 24' wide, surface of 6" of Class 5 gravel is
acceptable.
4.Underlying easements (road and utilities) over road outlot to be
obtained by City. ^
5. Septic testing for all four lots to be reviewed by staff.
6. Title opinion addressed to the City.
7. Park Dedication Fee ($250,00/lot) ■ $1,000.00
1i
•fli
tuim
* r. - 7- ---------^
LddATIOS OF PROPOSAL (or property)
Address ^ /goc/
CITY OF ORCNO, MIKNeISOTA
Land Use A^p^ica^^
C* ’- *
TX#’ uJ /c> ^ ^
Legal Description £■. £rO A o» i. n,7
Li t 7 jC. fZ'/ri'r/o'/A^
APPLICANT Name Richard L. Ralche
Mailing
Tel #471-0183
Address 2385 Shadvwood Road, Wayzata, MN. 55391
OWNER Name Richard L. Ralche
Mailing
Tel #471-9501
Address 2385 Shadywood Road, Wayzata, MN» 55391
TYPE .OF REQUEST
ii Subdivision $150+$/^7./rA
Conditional Use $50
Variance $50
Rezoning $250
___ Riprap $15 ($65)
FEE H ! ^6*^0 _______ f
Date Rec*d *^/ ■>^3 fj
By ytffH.. —t ^
Present 25oning Slnf^le Famtlv 2 Acre Min, Present Use Vacant Land
Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request
Specify Ordinance Requirements ^
Explain your request and reasons for same To comnleta previously proposed and
prellalnarlly approved subdlvlalon of "SUNNY KNOLL'* Into 4 single family lots.
Hi
f
VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity
_ _ u>t V** Setback Pront Side
Width
Rear
Specify hardships to pro
/
\/type lOF REQUEST
^ Suh(?*ivAsion $150+?/i?-^<?’A^
Condil^ional Use $50
_ Variance $50
_ Rezoning $250
_ Riprap $15 ($65)
late Rec*d__i::X4
^ - - - - - - - - -^
PURCI-L\SE AGRHHMHN r| f
V. J • • ? • f >
i;i.r‘:n
I INK rs-‘»r »
... .. 7»*inn.
RECFJVED OF . . .................................................. . , ^ .. x DOLLARS
, _ ...______j _j -----------------------------/
■'* -................................................i» r*” '■« “
iciirtii.Cwh. ............ j , ..• •••x ir.l siiuaifd in the
.................................................................../.’.% • ^ v- *- .- j. ... •'•• "■
.............................. . , ........ S:aie of Minnesota, and h-pUy dt-icnVicd as follows, tO 'M .
County of........................................................................................*
r... ;f.,iv=d rurv., .f ‘-'‘-O ,
Shades, Hindi* (including Venetian o.h« eV>Fmn. med in connrC.on there-
fixtures, hot water tanLs and heating plant (with an> h , ’ seller), sump pump, television antenna, inciner-
with), water softener and lie^id lop stoves Kential air conditioning equipment, if any, used a
• m . ^ ^ I.I- -k *. • J'ra I
i
lUL^^-t to ver i:»ir*.tlr»inr, in bic cvn rv*..nlC'n.
„............... , OO..UIKS
wfewnt, T-.,c Ih;.ut.sr--d ar..i nc/)<;0 "olUrsC--------------------------------(»v.,v...-.3
which the buyei agrees to pay in the following manner: ^ be fc rej.,iy, , ..iv/2 , the date of closing.
Earnest money herein paid $ . 1»ODD. 03 and I ^rr^ii^^by cont-set for died ; lo uc’nthly
S^2 0*50 UO vUh interest at the r4te of cor-ser.clag oa tht first dsy of
be dut T.tv«ble In full, pwc.est to p£ chii ccntr^ct for deed nay t«
FOUb S un- vh.. eetlr. Frf«‘P*‘ to tS viper. tb. t»fcttotlo. rttotto*
on the pToperty «blch h*. been ** roy bo requested. .
Seller agree* to *lgn *11 p«rer» pc-tlne t r.teto Broi «r In tbo St«t* of Mlt5.**oto so
It I* underetood tb»t Cbo^proper^ into A alngl* f*«ilj ^lldl«^«lto»...
p.en).« aibiect onl, iHie^SlUio* e.teptnma;
(O Bunding and «»ing rfJiSi^wtSUI’Xnive forfciiuie piovUmn.
and thcreafier. Seller mwrims tint ml esfiie uses due y«* 0 ^ l»ftiil or non homesmd — stue which)
At 'dATE OF CLOSING. i k ^ *f«r te-fct* provided that all mndhion* ol ihn
“^Th. xellet funhet asi*« lo deliver poiseuioa not Ifl"’’l*" oo^oT lilore M day* from ihe date heieof.
.hh «.)» «h.™^ .1^ Wo,, .h, do,!., !.«. .kb .Wl
........-
All m.;5«ir in wv .i/'U »ei«rneni» and continue in (« * »<tl« and said agent, m
:f,
this conirict. , ^ -
The deliver, of a« paper* and roonie* *hall be made at iheofite ol:
—2.385-£-bf>d3ra*oe*i-?jo*d.".....................................
tJ;*>the alww agreemeni and the *ale Iheielyoadt.
-------(SEAL)
4,5^. a*. .8 0.11 Ing. «iaci * t loo • ?• Id by 1 lo r.
.......-Age*
1 bI^a^4Sfe$E^ Vili^lalrtmptt, for the pii« and
^ ilif terms ibove jneiiiooed, lod swDjeci to ill ronditioaiupoo *a«» .
herein espressed.
.....J.i£hjird..!U.lobe-^*l-tT.v....Inx-----(SEAL)
[* Q‘?0'i0 COUNCIL U.r.LTi’JG H'iLD FEBRUARY 14, 1977
I
I • Horay Muhich, Building & Zoning AcLninistrator,
slalC'd that a public hearing will be held on
February 7, 1577 for the subdivision request of
Ruth vrcar property, 2901 ICalertown Road."
I am preparing my report far enough in .advance
to provide enough tine for you .-^nd all dep.irlment
heads to forward any coircrionts .ind reports to
me so I can include them in the agenda pachet
before the proposal comes up for consideration.
Page 21
/:
SUBDIVISION
2901 v:a ter town Road
$222
Ruth Wear Estate
I have already sent copies to our attorney and
engineer so we can incorporate their rc-coiroendations
and coirjnents in the final plat and resolutions.
I have also informed Mr. v;ear of the requircinent
of property title opinion addressed to the City
The original parcel consists of slightly more
than 10 acres, none of which is designated as
wetlands in our wetlands plat book. The proposed
private roadway consists of less than 31,000 sq. ft.
The areas of the lots are indicated in square feet.
They all exceed the minimum area requirement.
The dwellings can all be located to meet the
required lot width and setback requirements.
I have also informed Mr, \Jear of the procedures
and time span for approval of both the preliminary
and final plat. I also told him about the mylars
and hardshells and the park dedication fee ($250
per lot - 4 lots) and the possibility of City
easements over roadway.
Public Hearing - February 7,.1977
William Wear and several interested parties were
present. The Planning Commission recommended
approval of the proposed preliminary plat as all
four proposed lots and private road would meet
minimum zoning standards. Approval was recominended
on the condition that the final plat indicate the
following as requested by the City Engineer:
#47 -a
1.
2.
The northerly 1/4 of the site drains toward
Watertown Road and the southerly 3/4 to the
southeast to an existing drainage swale.
Th® street section proposed is 24* wide with
a surface of 6" of Class 5 gravel. If this
is to be a private road, the section is
satisfactory; however, the proposed street
does not meet the requirements for a City
street.
/yvi
‘ ^
(Continued)
r
c
i
c.-.o:;o COUNCIL irr::«;Tj’;g hkld f.oesuary ia, 1977
• ♦
^ m '■.»e size of the culvr-rt on vratortcwn Rc.'^d
should be deteiiriinc-d by the Public V.'orks
Supeivisor.
4, Drainage c-asc*iiients as shown on the plans
by the Enginc-er.
That 5* utility easc-itic-nts be piovidr-d
adjacent to the street for future under
ground telephone, gas and electric service.
6, Subject to a park dedication fee.
5.
Letter to Henry Kuhich, Building & Zoning
Adjninistrator, from Greg Frank, City Engineer,
dated February 7, 1977, ’.%ear property.
We have received the proposed Sunny Knoll sub
division and street grades and have the following
coKinents:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The northerly 1/4 of the site drains toward
Watertown Road and the southerly 3/4 to the
southeast to an existing drainage swale.
The street section proposed is 24* wide with
a surface of 6" of Class 5 gravel. If this
is to be a private road, the section is
satisfactory, however, the proposed street
does not meet the requirements for a City
street.
The size of the culvert of Watertown Road
should be determined by the Public Works
Supervisor.
Drainage easements as shown in the attached
print shall be included on the plat.
We recommend that 5* utility easements be
provided adjacent to the street for future
underground telephone, gas, and electric
service.
End of letter
Butler moved, Welsh seconded, to approve the
preliminary subdivision request of Ruth V?ear
Estates, 2901 Watertown Road, per the Planning
Commission Minutes of February 7, 1977, and
Engineer's recommendations noting all conditions
as set forth. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0).
Pace 22
SUEDIVISICK
2901 V.'atrrrtcwn Road
(Continued)
#47 X
•»
.•-."xvn
SUNNY KNOLL
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR
WILLIAM W. WEAR
IN LOT 7, AUDITOR*S SUBDIVISION NO. 230
# 2 2 2
#471
-- N
lA«>fr1r Mpb
in •er»» of tJiO «orD* X ••cn** of firil » of Uo
4, Tr»l^•hl^ 117 i:^>rlb, Vn.-« Utt of ^ih iTlnrUal horl4.,>o.
5X 7, Ata3iU»r*t SuMIvl.lar ¥«nr> ^.r. .>urty, mnt.«oot/.
Aflor of
/ /vC/f • /OO /^££T
sePTEnaeti s, i9n
MEAM SEA level
GORDON R. COFFIN
LAND SURVEYOR a PLANNER
LONG LAKE, miNNESOTA
• l.-rrHvrrr ilythalllmiimrcf,iJwumI
% A» ItcS«r«<«! I t Mr lit uojcv M> dirt«1 M|MV^
%»'»•:> oful It
Slur^i jruf itAb.'t
I om • 4«l|r Rfiltocft'd lo
ihc Iowa «i tlME Stale uf Mil
Vt
i
li
#471
/
J
.1 •
'• V• »4
a r
\
j
_J
O
« . • • •o' J
.T t
1
% «
I
\
4
»
r'
i
• I
t;I i
I
V
v/l « •
t
k:i
avOM NM0ia3icM Hinos /
Vt.I
PI
,1
I
/ w 4 V/
////• o f J . bt* 'r ^i f- V 1 r ^ i’
y/,
♦ ^ 7 ^ ^ a- f-"* S c * M* 2 ? * 2 f
-I -8 * * \ •'» ^ ^8 :io
3 ¥ i r » ^ r 5 i. * :: o ^ i
[
: 1 ! :-7,, I o |?rfIfi l s-1 5 ’-3-
Ijl^l
f.?/
s-i • » I S \i
UfU
\ ^ . .lA1^./ . : :1 y tI';
■'ii
.3 ' ,•* 41 f ft j • j 5 j£ i'
I; ,!*’;»!I«:
’ , • -r.; .> »'.ft %;^i
IlI*
s I
1
Si
mk
. ( i .. i
I
S
I
£8
f
s
'N
iO it > —
•* I
IC »»i qr
r-
3 ®
^ ••
I
'W
z
£ I
2
O
i?
I
a.
?
Ia
S
9
I
O
t/»o
9)
oz
tUl-fHl FiHii!
«li mn
'15
g5|?lt|f lisllltf&SSS*'_8.I •5a|Ss#3 iiifiif.^ i3i5iiif
““^-"3^ Ba^s3l=^
sf|ll*lSid|i|ii
;i5is:i;ssifilll
niHh^lill?l IKI
iiliil
W gc —
w »
•i 2 o
v-n •* C *•
(0 o
</> a.
o
%zm»»/>
o
m<m
O
*9m
90
t/»
«/>
at
<»
o
r s-
lO •*r- 2
9
_ 9— ^ <•
Z «/)
V ^
^ 2
- 3
S'*
o
w
9<<
at
at
9ex.
crt
cr
30<
m•<
O
30
^2
oo ^
Ol
vr 3
o M
— at o. «/* ^
■ ®* MO
2 » z
^ o o
^ f= 9
~ m
v». 2 ?r
^ to *Sf ^ - "
imi
UlMite