Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03-12-1979 Planning Packet
t -» AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 12, 1979 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER 1. Call to Order/Roll PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING 2. 7:30 P.M, #455 LAD Developinent, 405 Oxford Road - SUBDIVISION ACTION ITEMS 3 #399 Michael Plank, 4145 Watertown Hoad - FINAL SUBDIVISION (Resolution) 1: ml AlSander Holzer. 2677 Casco Point Road - VARIANCE/COND USE PERMIT 5 #442 Donald Scott, 2325 Longview Circle - FINAL SUBDIVISION (Resolution) 6^ #458 Richard Oliver, 3898 Cherry Avenue - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7! #463 Fred Ryan, 1345 North Arm Drive - VARIANCE 8. Stubbs Bay Moratorium Area (Continued Study of Land Use) . 9. North Central Study Area (Land Use Study - Call for Public Hearing 4-9-79) WORK SESSION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT k SKETCH PLAN REVIEW 1^ #464 Dr Kem Hoppe, 950 Sixth Avenue North - SUBDIVISION ll: lilt S^y PeterseS, 1340 Baldur Park Road - SUBDIVISION/VARIANCE approval OF MINUTES 15. Meeting of February 26, 1979 INFORMATION ITEMS 16. Comprehensive Planning Comments March 15, 1979 at 7:30 P.M. 17, Marina License Applications - Joint Meeting Planning Commission/Council 1 i. TO; FROM; DATE; Planning Commission and Council ^ ~ 3^ Jeanne A. Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator io fesr- Q February 2, 1979 SUBJECT: lAD Development, 405 Oxford Street Subdivision SKETCH PLAN REVIEW The applicant proposes dividing Lot 1, Block 1, Stielow's Addition, a four acre lot, into two lots*. Mr. Stlelow had included the lot division in his original plat, but because of septic difficulties causing delay in final plat approval, he decided against the division. The septic difficulties involved a mound system design for original Lot 1 that would meet the approval of both septic inspector and City engineer. I understand that a mound system has received staff approval. Both proposed lots meet the septic requirements. Entrance - Both lots to be served by plat road - location of entrance subject to staff approval. Wetlands -Wetlands involvement for both lots must be determined and a new conservation and flowage easement may be required. Lot requirements - Lot dimensions have not been given. Staff unable to determine if variance is needed. It appears that the necessary 200' of shoreline is available. Lot 1 may have some costly structural building considerations. ♦Review Page 2 of the Final Resolution (#939) which is enclosed with this packet. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - FEBRUARY 12, 1979 Planning Commission gave conceptual approval to the 2-lot plat proposed by the LAD Development Company and set a Public Information Meeting for March 12, 1979 at 7:30 P.M. Staff was asked to check the original Stielow plat file for additional information on flood plain and wetlands involvement for Block 1, Lot 1. I ■. - .n I i TO: FROM: Council and Planning Commission Jeanne A, Mabusth, Asst, Zoning Administrator #399 DATE:March 5, 1979 SUBJECT: y/399 Michael Plank, 4145 Watertown Road Final Approval - Subdivision - Metes & Bounds Mr, Plank has satisfied all the requests for final subdivision approval as stated in the Planner's letter of August 24, 1978, Staff recommends approval of subdivision subject to enclosed resolution. . ^ I ► ! r » I I 53 $ '5 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION FOR MICHAEL PLANK WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a tminicipal . gn<j organized and existing under the laws of the ta e o WHEREAS, the City Council of the °j°g°fe^develop^^ subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe P of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirement of the City, including: Dedication by quit data deed (ExWbit « of r^hts of way for public streets and roads, shown as Watertown ko a ^ of a Flowaee and Conservation EasementDedication to the City of f/J- f yge of wetlands^Exhibit B) providing for limitations on the use o and/or drainageways described therein. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the a,«>unt of $100.00. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED.^that^^^^ ^i$L5rfo ‘ Stahad City of Orono hereby ^ f Survev by Gordon Coffin dated re;ferer1ri9"8l-taf -Uowlns conditions: • » Ko ^*11 pd with the Hennepin County The aforesaid division shal cgntember 13 1979 together "c«dftarorlg?nal%opy oAhls Resolution and executed copies of Exhibits A & B as noted above. 1 The approval granted by Resolution It^wllrbe re^esfai;^o^U: frew^rpdlcdirwuh the city of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this day of .. 19, William B. Van Nest, Mayor ATTEST: W^ter R. Benson, uierx/Administrator .^SlS&a r’- • * % \ TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission and Council Jeanne A, Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator #442 March 5, 1979 SUBJFCT: #442 Donald J. Scott 2325 longview Circle - Subdivision Mr. Scott has completed all outstanding conditions sited on planner s notification of January 26, 1979. Please review the final resolution. Staff recommends approval of the plat in accordance with the enclosed resolution. li • • RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF LONGVIEW SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and City Council of the City of Orono has adopted of lanr^ithln'tL^'Sty; """ """" development e Council has considered the application for a subdivision plat by Donald Scott, the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: Dedication of drainage and utility easements as shown on the plat. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $250.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Longview Second Addition Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1. Access to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Longview Second Addition shall be via Longview Circle, Outlot A of Longview Plat. 2.The aforesaid plat shall be filed with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before September 13, 1979 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution. ■ 'ihe approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this day of . 19 ATTEST: William B. Van Nest, Mayor Walter K. Benson, Clerk Administrator I 1 < wn)L O 5 o 1 i £ a UJ a 5 j f- I- ^ •I D H O •yj u o <fill: ^ •: < -> r- a •/» »J o 4 V — X. *“ V m -I > ^ w 5 CVI4£/ / X \ \ 72^ T February 21, 1979 Richard Oliver 3898 Cherry Avenue Conditional Use Permit Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - FEBRUARY 26, 1979 The code requirements for the Conditional Use Permit application were reviewed for the applicant. The Planning Commission sited the difficulties of policing the renting of such guest house/apartments uses in residential neighborhoods. Is this use compatible in a 1/2 acre zoning district? The property was charged for one sewer unit. The City records show that the taxes for 1978 were not paid. The records show charges for a storage unit above garage not an appartment. Rates for storage unit $1.00/s.f. Rates for apartment unit $10.00/s.f. Staff will remind the Planning Commission that an approval can be conditional, and a denial must be documented. Please review the following sections No. 32.460 and 32.465 which are enclosed. 1 A*, u V. ?jki ? r. ------------- L»#458 CEiviTT T[iAr!Sf;jss!o;: co. Phone 7/? 265) Phone 437-3261 GATES V BEITS - irJ - fA^NiP - BEi.T - «Al*. - TivKEN - A.vtC GEa P AOODS sheaves - us Tiding BE.TS NEENAH. WISCON5lr>l preen BAY^ WISCONSIN Wfti • -i i 32.460. Conditional Uses; Granting of Permit. The City Council may gj.ant a conditional use permit as the use permit was applied foir or in modified form, if on the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the City makes the following findings: • (a) That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Code and the purposes oi the district in which the sTte^is ^ocat^j^ (b) That the proposed location of the conditi* »1 use and the proposed ^condit^^n under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the pu^ic heal^th, safety or weliaxe. or materiallv injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity? and (c) That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of thg—^ninq Code. A conditional use permit may be revokable, may be granted for a limited time, or may be granted subject to such conditions as the City Council may prescribe. 32.465. Conditional Uses: Denial of Permit. The City Council shall set forth contemporaneously in citin';* and in detail all the reasons for the denial of the conditional use j^rroi^jjJEiicatign, No application for a conckitionaT"Tise'“ permit which TTasoeen denied wholly or in part shall be re submitted for a period of six months from the date of said denial, except on grounds of new evidence or proof of changes of conditions found to be valid by the Planning Commission. (Amended Ord. 172, 12-19-74, effective 1-1-75) _ fi.C. C "iitt • «± a X TO:pXanning Coinniission 3nd Council FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator DATE: March 5, 1979 SUBJECT:#463 Fred S. Ryan, 1345 North Arm Urive Variance - Accessory Structure Setback Zoning District: LR-IB This la a renewal of Council on August 9, 197b. ,,,, y -ia'^ reauiring a setoack variance(17’ X 26.5') and dining room (12 X 14 ) requirxng from the existing garage. Required Setback: Proposed Setback: ——^ « Variance: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: We recommend approval of the application subject to the following conditions: 1. Garage to be structurally altered to allow for a one hour fire wall. 2. Applicant provide proof of #6 lot combination (see enclosure). 3 Applicant provide abstract pages verifying the street vacation. ■ (Review telephone message from City Attorney.) -- - -<=» -1^.^ j| •Mi Land Use Application * I4>CATI0N OF PROPOSAL (or property) Address I3>^^ K )<r>. Ac>^>y 9 Legal Description (P/^Ay <r£l ^L/fPo^y APPLICANT Name (Zv>/U ^ Tel %_j4ce2 Mailing type of request ivision $150+?5/Iot Ag>/\ 02 owner Name S» . ^ Mailing Address _ _ _ _ _ _ Tel j^SAM^ Present Zoning ^ i itional Use $50 l/^ Variance $50 FEE Da By Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($65) -7? ^Date Rec'd ~ ci /'}v 9 9 Z. Present Use oc-l rr-t/U.^ Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request —^/■— Specify Ordinance Requirements _7 ■■■g/?n4 Arrf ~n?.tAc7u<gfc. Explain your request and reasons for same |AOQ<T~toO- l’7*x Zc, ^ ieVf4_*__________________________ VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity lot. Area _ _ Setback Front- - Side Width i/^ Other, explain __A_ Rear Specify hardships to property SUBDIVISION app^cation Residential Other, explain No. of Lots CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail minimum material necessart for complete application (Must Le submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) 1. 2. 3. 4. Application completed Plat map section Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal Construction plans, xf applicable 5. Certified Property Owner's list o owners within (300') (150* )“• froii Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center 6. Stamped, legal sized envelopes!#: pre-addressed to each of the nam< on the above list. DATE DATE Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature annUfMant herebv agrees to provide all infonn^ion required'’ or requcs^^ ^ XfJSSutrator. City Engineer, city Attorn^ P« and council necessary to process this application and further ag all fees as established by ordinance. 5/78 r; —~IIH I £ J J ji / ^/ (T - / ^ cm CP OBDNO, MIM'IESam Ccnditioiial Use and Vauriancje T^pplicati w IDCATICIN OF PFDPOSAL (or property) Address f\ Jn>.i T^al Description ^or s ity ^L.OCtC (rs a Lcyr 6>. 1. ^'wer 8 to Slcxjc ~t applicant Saga. • Name ^. (c^Axi Phone t4(r>Z. TkSdxBSS •m * j Ol«ER M-une Phene i • Address____________________—-------------------- E OP PBQUEST Conditional Use VariaiKje Vfetlands Variance Present Zoning____rti. >r->Present Use ZcMiing Ordinance Section Relating to Request—3/» ^ FOR CEFICIAL USE ONUf Council action Date _ _ _ - ;^proved_ Denied r^OKr^A. (.^mhO <n' Crf^-A Bequest telsUw to Reaalrgrents J <^^..0 Tr^ HV /-(gAj^TO A- MACT/i? p,^riA7T-M A,4>n nimor-, ffmnM.Tn Qn iLAi,f i.>.-r>4i»’> 4 pyr r<= Trif r-^f^--------- Extent of ------- r S..S -rrt'Ctnfy To Trtf r-n^iwv^ leoxlshipe to Property TUt^^ j,/xVrM«j---0£—MfV^^ r/^ ^^-rOiAT!TtfTC f?cnnM p,<=n A.ir^-rvlP/7 (^rArTTinO. fHPPArriC-AU^---------------- MEMEFIAL NECEGSAKf FOR CXTPI^nE APPLIO^^ (Mist be sutndtted 1 week prior to Ccxmcxl Meeting) 1. ;^licaticn conpleted 2. * Plat Map Section 3. Survey (Sketch: in proposal) 4, Abstractor's Certificate of Property ' Owners Within -AOB Ft. 5. $30.00 Poe Date t/z M(o Signature J MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 i:<«« • ~T^£‘ Ou>/yaz • Bi/ic^c ^ . NAME / y-M- /.■-- r- < i /• h -£iLeC> ____A " *■ (, ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNERS LIST r / /-/ /'i i > s'DESCRIPTION SFr LOT BLK. PARCEL /-'i* “f- F.’-/''\-. ■.' -F' ■' '' f '' . -/ / ^ C 4. tv - : / * _______^ /' /r. J : //’ • ^ - ^ // ’/' AAm^jL)j2/?.fijcY_„_ / vv/-/- 0. Af^H/rsaf/ -^Amei C.. J aF i.i.-'.'/V •/•.. j/lAfC£A^^JpMA!Stf//^ ^LFJUf/J?. C9Acjo/Y._ KOicuiAP ^E'UfTCA/, fyC .> 1' / Y. t •»'/ •/ •' ' ■^/ /7 //. fr ’’ ■ !,'f' Y'/-' ■'-~.. ••-• ^ »■ /' L-' 2' * ^ ^ u/’ ' /;-;y; /'"a rv-v'- ' • .' / / ’./,. .V , t ^>'- / //, / ■•'<'<- •• ,1 r /Z •/ z'^/w' II Pi • 1/ / a ; ^ GO O-O^l___ e>c> 7- 007^ Go "^ ^ 00 3O GO-^/ OG ^ “7^ Jhi. ‘'O. A ^ -z/-V-zZ'l-. .iJ!iO:. fLi, i ^ •/-/ /"/'/> V /\ ^^^_-rj^’__ .^. <- ^ ___i’ 3 y L ' A /''•t V r /‘^ \. /^. *'-*r •-iyH _A._;t!;. _. c>7yL-U'2-y-JZ.J^^ / Sjjpipei-u^^/^p/p iy-jzyyixy:.__ |l wrtffy tnn ir^ f i> tr T-rf^ on tMs cer1*?»:^t*: ? -iC- 11 u ;• u-- ri V' * Ucn ft il rr cv t .' ! "\a Div., tu i:.t L'cS*. CT n^y KMOwicoge ^__Henn. Co. Flnir>ce Division Oo “7^ <5»iS> GG GG I Jl /{} \v' / I* Plat of Survey for Fred £. Ryan in Rlocka 6 and 7, F>i.^a H511 Koviscd Hennepin Coi.nly, Kinn®soto H ■ 0 I 4.tS X 69.ff £ Prai^tys^cf aaat//on'*^ / / X 9n-% Vi \ / ^ V x_ s5>- C?W X'. •-**..•• y i?5^, 7<^^? /y. r s/ VWc:c X • •• .• •# • /-•* • >• •m V T • • Certificate of Surve;/: I hereby certify that this Is b true and correct reoresentation of » run’ey of the boundaries of that nart o^ L/'t 5 I'^lnr Southwest erly cf a 5tr»-iiht line running frcoi thn oddnnln'. of ’.:.e NorUiweslcrly line of said tot 5 to tho tridpcint of the Southeasterly line of said *<ot 5| and all of Lots 6 and 7, P.lork 6, AKD Lots 6, 7, and f. Flock 7, all In Sui^a Mill R:vir.ed, 'letu'iepln Co., I'Jrji., , tho location of ^11 existing luilainpr. ther'^rr., .nd the pr'ocnc^ location of two prooosoJ ndditions to an existing cuildinr, end all visible encrcuehi/ents fro» or on said land. Scale Dute 1" - 60* 6-a-7*:. Iron rar’/.or found Iron Tv-rVer set Land Curveycr snd FIinner Long Lske, rir.nerota ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 9, 1976 The CoiTunission felt that this was not a violation by the Petersons who purchased the property only one year ago. They were unfortunate to inherit' ah existing non-conforming situation v;hich v;as never before brought to the attention of the staff, Searles moved, Welsh seconded, to approve the variance for Wayne Peterson, 1359 Park Drive, per the Planning Commission recommendation of August 2, 1976, Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Page 2 VARIANCE 1359 Park Drive (Continued) Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, stated that Michael Curtis, 4200 North Shore Drive, now resides in a home which is located on a lot that does not meet the code requirements of 1 acre area and 140* lot width. He is ' requesting approval of a variance to add to the existing structure. The existing lot contains 11,000 sq, ft. and is 46* wide at the location of the house. This lot is therefore 32,560 sq. ft. short of the required lot width. The proposed addition would not conflict with the required setbacks. Planning Commission Meeting - August 2, 1976 The Commission recommended approval of this variance because the proposed addition would be replacing the substandard lean-to portion of the house, and it would in no way encroach on the existing setbacks. Paurus moved, Massengale seconded, to approve the variance for Michael Curtis, 4200 North Shore Drive, per the Planning Commission Minutes. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). VARIANCE 4200 North Shore Drive Henry Muhich, Building 6 Zoning Administrator, stated that Fred Ryan, 1345 North Arm Drive, is requesting approval of an addition between his house and garage. Although I have no building plans yet, he informs me that the setback between the structures would be only 4*. This would require a variance of 6* as our ordinance requires 10* between structures. This would not create a problem as we could treat the garage as an attached garage and require the necessary one hour fire wall in the garage to provide an adequate fire separation between structures. VARIANCE 1345 North Arm Drive (Continued) ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 9, 1976 Page 3 The existing garage extends over the lot line onto VARIANCE **^j*r®! Therefore, I would recommend 1345 North Arm Drive condition that the 5>s lots and the (Continued) ,.street be combined into one parcel, A sub division would then be required before any future proposal for additional building sites could be approved by Council, Planning Commission Meeting - August 2, 1976 The Zoning Administrator presented the building plans to the Commission, Mr, Ryan was present to explain his plans for this addition. The Planning Commission recommended approval subject to providing fire separation as required by the State Code and the combination of all the individual parcels and vacated street. The subject of the vacated street should be referred to the Attorney to resolve its actual status. Searles^moved, Massengale seconded, to approve the variance for Fred Ryan, 1345 North Arm Drive, as per the Planning Commission minutes of August 2, sxibject to verifying that all properties are part of vacation. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0), Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, stated that Travis Smith, 1945 Eagerness Point Road, originally obtained a building permit to construct a dwelling as located on the original survey. Either the owner or contractor changed this proposed location to the opposite corner. VThen we made our first footing inspection, the ^®obing ^ appeared to be set bac)c the necessary 30*. Without the proper engineering instruments, impossible to measure the horizontal distance over mounds of dirt and into 4* or 5* excavations. Since the building has been framed in, Mr, Larry Shaw, a neighbor, has turned in a complaint of encroachment on the rear lot line. We requested a new survey from the Smiths which they submitted on July 7, 1976. The new survey does confirm the allegation of encroachment. Since learning of this, the Smiths have submitted an application for a variance from the rear yard setback requirement. The location of the house as built is 26'8" from the rear lot line which is 3*4" short of the required 30* setback requirement. This parcel is one of the two resulting from the replatting of Fagerness Green Subdivision which was approved December 10, 1973. Please note the shaded shoreline area across the street from the subject property as shown on the enclosed copy of the Fagerness Green Subdivision. This shoreline area was evidently not included in this plat. VARIANCE 1945 Fagerness Point Road ( Con ^ .11..J11.S OF A PUVsLNG O3;iUSS10N ItliTING IfKLD AUCWST 2, 1976 -PAGE 2 Pesek moved, ^thrie seconded, that the minutes of the Plying Commission meeting of July 19, 1976, be approved. Motion - Ayes (8), Nays (0). Mr Peterson explained to the Planning Coirmission that he had purdiased this property about 1 year ago. He under- sto^ there were misunderstandings, but felt that the problems had been solved. The Peterson's purchased this property in good faith. Pesek moved. Van 1,'est seconded, to approve this variance because it is after the fact and the pool has been tliere for the past three years. Pesek felt that this was not a violation by the Peterson’s idio purchased the property only one year ago. They were unfortunate to inherit an existing non-confonning situation w)iich was never before brought to the attention of staff. Motion - Ayes (8), Nays (0)T Mr. Curtis ivas in attendance and presented pictures of his property. After a short discussion, ?-fcDonald moved, Pesek seconded, to grant approval of this variance because the proposed addition wuld be replacing the substandard leanto portiOT of the house and it would in no way encroach on the existing setbacks, htotion - Ayes (8), Nays (0). The Zoning Administrator presented the building plans to ^e ConmissiOT. Mr. Ryan was present to explain his plans for this additiCHI. Van Nest moved, Guthrie seconded, to recoinmend approval subject to providing fire separations as r^^r^ by the State Code and the combinaticjn of all the ^dividual parcels and vacated street. The subject of the vacated street should be referred to the attorney to resolve its actual status. were in attendance. Mrs. Smith explained to the Conmission that at the start of the construction they instructed the contractor not to disturb the trees that were on the property in order to build the house. The l^ation of the house was then moved over to avoid removing the trees. The inspector was never informed of the change in lcx:atian. Larry Shaw, a neighbor to ^e north of the Smith’s was also present at the meeting. He expressed his disappointment with the building of this u *1* n*cntioned that he conplained several times to Uie building inspector regarding the building location. Smith’s home blocks his view of the lake. The Planning Commission felt that the only question here was the rear yard setback as the new sideyard setback requirements. Pesek mov^, Hake second^, approval of this variance ecause the house is finished. However granting this ^nsti^te approval for a private dock OT the shoreline strip directly across the street. Motion - Ayes (8), Nays (0). CALL TO ORDER - 8:20 P.M. RRGUIJVR fEETING APPRO\'AL OF MINUreS hEETING JULY 19, 1976 V:^YNE PETERSON 1359 PARK DRIVE VARIANCE - SIDE YAPJ) SETBACK maiAEL CURTIS 4200 NORTH 3I0RE DRIVE VARIANCE - LOT AREA 6 WIDTH FRED RYAN 1345 NORTH ARM DRIVE VARIANCE - SETBACK BETIVEEN STRUCTURES TRAVIS SmiH - 1945 EAGERNESS POINT ROAD VARIANCE - REAR YARD SETBACK DRONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 26, 1976 Dick Benson, City Administrator, stated that the proposed Bike Trail project funded by the State does follow the same criteria as the F.A.U. Grant applied for by the City of Orono two years ago. The present Federal Demonstration Project and the previously applied for F.A.U. Grant are entirely different routes that, if approved by the two agencies, would require some City funding, F.A.U^ ($120,000, F.D.P, $37,500) which v;ould have to be supported by a mill levy. The question that always arises is, what will the environmental impact be, hardcover, trees, other removal of natural obstructions, etc. I recommend we apply for the project now and if approved by the agencies, then allocate monies for an environmental study, if this is a chargable expense to the project. Mr. V7alt Lathrop, Park Commission Chairman, and Fern Kubalsky, Bike/Hike Trails Chairwoman, addressed the City Council in favor of the project and reviewed the entire project, Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to apply for the Federal Demonstration Project in the amount of $37,500. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Page 2 BIKE TRAIL PROJECT Mayor Searles spoke briefly of his concerns of public safety on Lake Minnetonka stating that this is of the utmost importance to all residents and users of the lake as recreation increases each year. . Paurus moved, Butler seconded, that the request of Fred Ryan, 1345 North Arm Drive, for a setback variance, be referred to the Pliuining Commission, Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). LAKE MINNETONKA SAFETY VARIANCE 1345 North Arm Drive Paurus moved, Butler seconded, tliat the request of Robert Edwall, 2640 Kelly Avenue, for a lot area and width variance, be referred to the Planning Commission, Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) VARIANCE 2640 Kelly Avenue Paurus moved, Butler seconded, that the request of Travis Smith, 1945 Eagerness Point Road, for ® rear yard setback variance, be rt?ferred to the Planning Commission, Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) Paurus moved, Butler seconded, that the request of Earl Norwood, 1360 Vine Place, for a variance, be referred to the Planning Commission. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). VARIANCE 1945 Fagerncss Point Road VARIANCE 1360 Vine Place fUNUl’ES OF A PIA’^MNG CatriSSION flLliTlNG HELD JULY 19, 1976 - PAGE 4 ahsFred ^’an was present to exfildin his pi__ addition between his house and garage. He nibntioned that his plans were not coiTf)lete, and the Commission informed him that they would have to be complete and correct by Friday, July 23, In order for the Planning Commission to be able to review before acting on the proposal at their next meeting. FRED RYAN • 1345 NORTH ARM DRIVE VARIANCE #463 Guthrie moved, Hosfield seconded* to approve, this variance due to the fact that, ho additional land is available for expansion ahd the area is sewered. Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (d), Abstain (1 - f-tDonald). ROBERT EDWALL 2640 KELLY ROAD VARIANCE - LOT AREA 5 IVTUIH * The Zoning Administratok" infgnlied the Planning Commission that this item had been cancelled. Mr. Johnson decided to move and requested that his $30 application fee be ietumea. Harik recoirenended the refund be denied as staff had completed all review and reports. W-J^IH JOHNSON 4075 HKHIVOOD ROAD VARIANCE - STREET SETBACK The Planning Cotmiission made the suggestion to Hank ^tJhich that he contact the City Attorney, Bruce Malkerson, before the next meeting as to his reconmendations on this variance. TRAVIS SMITH 1945 EAGERNESS POINT ROAD VARIANCE - REAR YARD SETBACK Pesek moved, Guthrie seconded, approval of this revised preliminary plat subject to determining a Park Dedication Fee. Motion - Ayes (6), Nays (0). Final approval of the PRD proposal was delayed until detailed plans of the entire concept are submitted. LOU OBERHAUSER HERRICK CIRCLE SUBDIVISION (PRELIMINARY PLAT PRD) The Planning Connission went into work sessions on Wayne Peterson and Michael Curtis. McDonald moved, Pesek seconded, to eliminate the Council’s original referral of Planning ConmissiOT proposals in order to expedite the proceedings. The Commissicn feels this would promote better public relations, ^btion - Ayes (6), Nays (0). Steve Felssnberg of the David C. Bell Conpany was present and asked the Commission if he could discuss sometning that was not cn the agenda. He informed the Planning Canmission that Drs. Zinn and Dale owned 13 acres of land near Watertown Road and County Road 6. He was interested in knowing how they could subdivide this property. After some discussion, the Planning Conmission advised that he could submit a subdivision application for 2 lots of 5+ acres. Hosfield moved, Guthrie seconded, that the meeting be adjourned at 9:55 p.ra. ________ #46 Feb 1 VERNON T. HOPPK finance division DIRECTCR no COURTHOUSE MINI^EAPOLIS, MINNEiJOTA 55A15 DEAR sir ; 1 HS<m HJUCE H£D.U£SI Ft* A tSSEWXW;' COiBINED) yVSSESaiENT ON INS following described land : Saga Hill Revised, Lots South | of 5, 6 and 7, Bl^- -_an Lotse; 7 and 8, Block 7 _______________________________________ XOWNv^^lujfcE CR Injure of fee wNm - Orono FOR 1980 TAX YEilR NAME OF TAX PAYER \'?A^ Oo. A-c.^ Or AAp>tA^yA M^V ML TAX PAYER ’S ADDRESS COMBINED CIRRENT VALUES H CR N.H.ACR EXMP. • LAND BUILDING machine total full AND TRUE total assessed • • #4 oo oAii 2.4'-7C- TO_____7^^.___ HOUR. WHILE YOU WERE OUT H % _____ PHONE AMC.A COOC PmOnC NUMBCM ULEFHONED X.RETURNED CALL LER PACfUGC PLEASE CAU WAS IN PLEASE SEE ME WILL CALL AGAIN WILL RHURN IMPORTANT MESSAGE -pe^-Cauy**^<UjLr^^ ________ r-* ............................................ SIGNED Th« AlCO-UTILITV Lin* Form No 5S4>56 TO:Council FROM: DATE: Alan P. Olson, Village Planner March 6, 1979 SUBJECT: Stubbs Bay Moratorium Area A STUBBS BAY MARINA The attached resolution has been prepared ror your consideration at the March 13, 1979 meeting as requested after the public hearing at the last meeting. The resolution sets forth the intent of the Council based upon the record of the Public Hearing, general city records and the history of the area. This is not the detailed record of findings as staff is still in the process of preparing that resolution. Rather than rush a draft to the Council, I felt that accuracy outweighed timeliness. I recommend that the Council adopt the attached resolution. I also recommend that the Council instruct staff to advertise and call a rezoning public hearing for the first meeting in April. I recommend that the pending George Johnson application for a 1979 Marina license be denied based upon the record of the February 27, 1979 meeting. B CONTINUING LAND USE STUDY The Council's attention has been focused on the Stubbs Bay Marina site because of Mr. Johnson's requests for early study and policy decisions. Even though the final answer of limited commercial vs residential use has yet to be made, the major research involvement is complete and staff has more time to devote to the rest of the study area. •• ; -jr March 6, 1979 Stubbs Bay Moratorium Study Page 2 B. CONTINUING LAND USE STUDY Lot size and housing inventories need to be done and the on-site system inspection program must be completed. A major area of concern is still the sewer question. I strongly recommend that the City Engineer be instructed to reopen the alternative waste control study. Since active study was dropped in 1975, several new developments have occured: 1. Completion of the 73-1 sewer project. 2. Relocation and actual construction of a revised MWCC interceptor. 3. Completion of the HUD flood plain stu-y. 4. Revisions to the on-site code and institution of the inspection program. 5. A major change in attitude of the EPA and PCA regarding on-site waste treatment including possible funding sources. 6. A staff change in Zoning and Engineering, 7. Significantly little new construction (except additions) in the entire area, I believe that we still have some Block Grant monies available which have been earmarked for this study. « • t r « RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF INTENT REGARDING PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT OF STUBBS BAY MARINA PROPER'FY T- - one and the on-site A major area of concern mmend that the City ive waste control study, al new developments oject. ion of a revised I in stu^-r. md institution of :he EPA and PGA »nt including igineerxng. ruction (except additions) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted Ordinance No. 219 establishing a Moratorium on development in the Stubbs Bay Area of the City; and WHEREAS, as a part of the study undertaken to accomplish the purpose of said Moratorium, the City has undertaken a spec^l study of the past use and proposed development of property kno as Stubbs Bay Marina; and WHEREAS, the City Council has assembled reports and researched the Stubbs Bay Marina Property extensively over the pas several years, particularly over the past weeks since the Moratorium warLtabllsh^d! and the City Council has duly considered the recoimien- datlons of staff, consultants and the general public as documented in the record of a Public Hearing called for this purpose on February 27, 1979; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby determines that the subject property is not suitable for commercial marina use of the magnitude proposed by George Johnson in his request for 66 slips, and that the i y oun intends to undertake the following action in response to this determination: 1. Adopt a comprehensive resolution setting forth the detailed reasons for making this determination. 2. Adopt appropriate amendments to the City s Comprehensive a e TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator March 5, 1979 #459 SUBJECT: #459 Richard Proudfit, 3220 Navarre Lane Conditional Use Permit WORK SESSION - Zoning Dis^tict LR>1C_ DATE ZONING (WNER BUSINESS TYPE Prior to 1975 B-1 Darrftl WatachXw Collision Center Auto Repair January 1, 1975 LR-IC Darrel SatachXe Collision Center Auto Repair March 20, 1976 LP-IC Richard Proudfit VlVlng Rubber Rubber Hfg. Collision Center Auto Repair Lake Van 4 Storage Storage Praaent LP-IC Richard Proudfit Viking Rubber Rubber Kfg. ysj? permitted U«e Legal Non-Conforming Illegal Non-Conforming Uae Illegal Non-Conforming Use Illegal Non-Conforming Use Illegal Non-Conforming Use Mr. Proudfit has asked to file an application seeking a Conditional Use Permit for his light industrial use of the property located at 3220 Navarre Lane. He failed to do so in March, 1976 when he purchased the property and has been in violatioi of the Zoning Code for the past two years. The applicant states that he was not aware of the effects of the discontinuance in the original non-conforming use and has only recently been made aware of the Zoning violation, be claims his operation has brought only good to the immediate neighboihood, but the developers of Lafayette Ridge contend to differ. Staff has explained that an industrial use of land is not permitted in a residential district (Ordinance No. 34.520) and that once Mr. Watschke's auto repair business, a legal non-conforming use, ceased to exist, then that property could only be for residential use (Ordinance No. 31.101). Please read the enclosed material for the necessary background information. Staff Recommendation: Work Session should consider the following: 1. Review all Zoning Implications: 31.101, 32.210, 32.250, 34.520 Can Planning Commission site others? 2. Review Points in Applicant's Position: a) limited industrial use - R & D ^ J March 5, 1979 Richard Proudfit 3220 Navarre Lane Conditional Use Permit Page 2 #459 3. b) limited physical use of site - For example to five cars. c) Ignorance of facts upon sale of land. d) vandalism - police state this has improved. e) others? Doesn't this application also involve a variance to the Zoning Code? - parking limited i of ORONO, MINNESOTA ^~~ ’ Land Use Application • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL {or propert Address 3220 Navarre Lane. Wavzata. MN 55 Legal Description Village of Mtka Beach, Lot 64 APPLICANT Name Richard A. Proudflt Mailing Address ____ Tel # 546-8981 6490 Westchester Circle, Mpls. 55427 OWNER Name Mailing Address Richard A. Proudfit Tel #644-3440 6490 Westchester Circle, Mpls. 55427 Present Zoning fPE OF REQUEST fc^.^bdivision $150+?SA^t. Conditional Use §50 Variance $50 _ _ Rezoning $250 _ _ Riprap $15 ($65) FEE itP Date Rec'd By ^ Present Use R & D Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request 32.210 Specify Ordinance Requirements 32.250 L Explain your request and reasons for same building and better the community. To continue use of an existing VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity Land Use Application LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or propert Address —^20 Navarre Lane. Wav7.afl ,-MM -;c: Legal Description Village of Mtka Beach, i.nt PE OF REQUEST division $150+$5A<5t Tel #546-8981applicant Name Richard A. PmnHfif Mailing Address _________6490 Westchester Circle, Mpls. 55427 OWNER Name Mailing Address Richard A. Proudfit Tel #544-3440 6490 Westchester Circle, Mpls, 55427 Conditional Use $50 _ _ Variance $50 _ _ Rezoning $250 _ _ Riprap $15 ($65) fee Present Zoning Date Rec*d By -JllA Present Use Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request 32,210 Specify Ordinance Requirements 32,250 Explain your request and reasons for same building and better the community. To continue use of an existing VARIANCE required Area Widtl extent of nonconformity _ _ _ Setback Front_ __ Other, expl^ Side Rear Specify hardships tq.j>gq^>^t^P~~ change - other than clean up the property. SUBDIVISION apptt Resident!Other, explain of Lots CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail --------------Balding to be used for R & D with an office. Also slight molding of small close tolerance parts. MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) Certified Propej^ijujIVner' s list of > owners within^(300'from Hennepin Co. Application completed 2. Plat map section 3. Certificate of survey of property Hennepin Co. DSprT^ Finance sketch location and setbacks of a-603 Government Center ^ stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) construction plans, if applicable pre-addrcssed to each of thrnaLs ’ - / / on theV/ fy 9DATE DATE V/ /7 / Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature aE Suncii*^cesj!^‘to'pr!celf"?Mra^3^™t*“°''"F^^““^all fees as established by ordinance. agrees to pay 5/78 53 .£3 1 ki _S70O r^\S?oo Cooo ____________________ Ml 1 t _ 04OO 1 Ly K.. 1 i 1 1 ( \3/00 ■i ! 1 </oo /Z 7ooo ^ 1JZ ^ooo ^ooo2 1 o CO 2 CD Ll*#’* i • • • .: / . r* .-, I I > N • — |L MtNNEPlN COUNir CITATION T^vAwrC n^rr»tA ("t'V No. 53 013588 NA/a E ADDRESS \SK^ • U>3sst M|>/____________ST. M/i ZIPCITY JUV , D.O.B.SEX OPERi lie. NO STATE •t I nl9r IKi 'V.r^ir/^/JYlSL VEHICLE lie NO _ YR ST.« MAKE 1 MODFl COIORJ • nATP. MO 2- nAV / fe YR. ^9 TIAAE: PLACE 3Z2D fOAOAW-E Z-AOt; ** * STAT. 0<cAX> ?/.//»/ S2.7JO _ meter ■ ENDANGER UPE OR PROPERTY accident UNSAFE CONDITIONS I IM «»««••■ 2^?*//a / C j BADGE NO.ACTIVITY COURT DIVISIOnJ_COAW_CODE J , _ _ PENAITIES Will BE ASSESSED AND AN ARREST WARRANT Will BE ISSUED fOR NOT RESPONDING TO THIS CITATION VVITHW7DAYS at the VIOLATIONS BUREAU IISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. SIGNATURE. 1 J-tAi. 5 Uj tt e I 5o Uja: Ul Q 8 CITYOFOROMO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO. DATE TIME CALLED-IN* • SCHEDULED completed ADDRESS 3XZO /Ja f/A Eg F UjO*=> OWNER CONfR. TELEPHONE NO. 5 Q i I8 § § □□□□ Da D□ FOOTING FRAMING INSULATION WALL BO. FINAL PROGRESS DEMOL FIRE PREV. □□ O O□□□□ PLUMBING Rl MECHANICAL WATER HOOKUP MFTER SET/TURN ON SEWER HOOKUP SEPTIC INSTALL. SEPTIC MAINT. WELL TES^ PUMP □ SITE INSErCTION □ EXCAV./GKAOING/FILLING □ LAKESHORtiWETLANOS □ LICENSING ^COMPLAINT ^ FOLLOWUP □ SE£I1C FINAL /A^______________ COMMENTS: C-f£0(<C>£_____V7g LT>g. — 5a LGS j^lWQ ___________________ £T>>. C, -Vo {JE.6jc/^ C=*\\S<~ ~Vo _________ ^koC^i(o(0 ORD 3V.^20 ---------------------------------------------------■ 3 2 ^ZtO □ PHOTO TAKEN□ WORK SATISFACTORY: PROCEED D CORRECT WORK A PROCEED □ CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING □ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN. O STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR. □ INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. •call for the next inspection 24 hours in advancei A E)ecember 18, 1978 Mr. Alan P. Olson City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: 3220 Navarre Lane, Orono Your 11/29/78 letter #459 Dear Alan: We moved Into the building in 1976 to do design, experimenting and office work. That still is our Intention. We have attempted to do a great service since that time to the community for the following reasons: 1. Having all the Junk cars removed from the area; parked on the street in front of the building and in back. 2. Cleaned up the dumping grounds started by the previous tenants. 3. Painted the building and cleaned up the area. 4. Gave jobs to some of the young kinds in the neighbor hood. 5. This stopped the vandalism. 6. Also by having 2 people at night reduced vandalism. This past year our experimenting has proven out very well. Therefore, we started looking for land and building to go into production two months ago. The building at Navarre will not support any production for us but only experimenting and design work. Cont'd.... Mr. Alan P. Olson - 2 - #459 December 18, 1978 This Is a great way to start a business and then place It In an industrial area. We feel we improved the community. The parking of 5 cars is all we have and believe it is on city property. From the edge of the road it is approximately 20', then drops into a swamp and nothing beyond that but open field. I'm sure you want as clean an operation as possible in a commercial building among a residential area. We are doing just that. We also planned to decorate the building. Respectfully, Richard A. Proudfit » RP/lg February 19, 1979 '#459Mr. Alan P. Olson City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Alan: We would like to follow up on our visit and request for a conditional use permit. 3220 Navarre Lane Wayzata, MN 55391 Building was purchased March 20, 1976. For the first year building was used for storage and car repair which was basically the same for many years prior to my purchasing the building. Our use was a small section, the office and tool equipment. We also used the basement. The 2nd year the storage (Lake Van & Storage) moved out along with the car repair. We continued doing R & D with small molding of parts. During this time effort was put into the building and grounds due to the extreme run down condition. All junk cars removed, 3 truckloads of debris from a dump that was started in the rear of the building, weeds cut down plus painting the building. Also stopped people from filling in the wet land behind the building. We do not intend to change anything in .the future, but only use and continue what we've been doing for the last 3 years. The improvements are tremendous over what it used to be. We intend to change the outside decor to fit in more with the community, sketch attached. This is only to upgrade the community and would no*. or benefit us in what we are doing. Taking pride in the neighc od is our goal. Cont'd i L Mr. Alan P. Olson - 2 -February 19, 1979 One of the biggest factors that has developed since we took over was to help reduce the vandalism. Because of the junk cars and repair kids were roaming around and breaking in. Rather than fight this we joined with a few of the neighborhood boys and gave them odd jobs, clean up. This really helped. We will continue this to help the young people become more active in the area. Also by having someone (2) in the building after hours really helped in curtailing the vandalism. Presently it is up to 12 PM. Because we are a very small company we only expect approximately 7-8 people, 4-5/day and 2-3/night. It is a very quiet operation with nothing on the outside of the building. Parking to amount to approximately 5 cars, some which will be parked in back, weather permitting. We have daily UPS with approximately 1 truck/week . We feel very strongly that we’ve really helped the community; not only cleaning up + helping the young people, but to restore decaying property and put a pride in our work. We enjoy the area and would definitely be an asset to the people and feel we have not created any hard feelings with the people, but tried to work with them. Respectfully, R. A. Proudfit / / /' RP/lg enc. Telephone 473 7357 CITY of OMONO Post Ofr.ce Box 66.Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323*Municipal Office. On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka CERTIFIED MAIL “ RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED November 29, 1978 Mr. Richard Proudfit 1511 West Constance Drive Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 Re: 3220 Navarre Lane, Orono Dear Mr. Proudfit: „ has recently co»e “ -Jentlon of the i„sp« department a rubber parts manufacturing plant. This letter is building is in direct violation of tne. zoning City of Orono. Section 34.520 prohibits industrial use of Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning Use Section 31.101 prohibit^ ^ncollision^Center°”au^ body repair shop non-conforming use. (The Collisi non-conforraing use. As soon November 29, 1978 Mr. Richard Proudflt Page 2 #459 Section 32.210 requires a Zoning Occupancy Certificate for any ^ new use of a building or for any change in use of a non-conforming use. No certificate has been requested and none has been issue . Operation without the certificate is a violation. With this letter, I HEREBY INSTRUCT YOU TO CEASE THE ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND USE OF THIS BUILDING WITHIN 15 DAYS, or show cause why such use should not be discontinued within 15 days. Failure to cease che use shall result in tagging for ordinance violations and prosecution by the City Attorney's office. AP0:kh cc: Mr. Bruce Malkerson, City Attoimey Mr. Walter Benson, City Administrator bcc •. #459 W’ L CITY OF ORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO._______ CALLEOIM SCHEDULED DATE / . 7- TIME ADDRESS OWNER SCHtDULtU ---------------------- _ COMPLETED A j(7 ' — CONTR-------- TELEPHONE NO. □ FOOTING □ FRAMING O INSOLATION r O WALLBD. a FINALu. o progress S □ DEMOL. a FIRE PREV. ^ COMMENTS: > —------------— o PLUMBING Rl O MECHANICAL a WATER HOOKUP Q METER SETrrURN ON □ SEWER HOOKUP □ SEPTIC INSTALL. □ SEPTIC MAINT. Q WELL TEST PUMP n LICENSING COMPLAINT FOLLOWUP a SEPTIC FINAL O______________________ / > J /-//US’, --f!*'jCCZ. I O; ______ L c/lz 2 a:e Uj0: KIIo />Ar- //^y ‘Tcrk^. fky-ry .i,. y. yyy(^ y^f/’f ' Ml e. U j — Ct U j :ziz S a proceed □ photo ta «n g SST6??«l^To';fHi “«^L™ &OE AOCtSS. call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance, Owner/Contr. on site Inspector ------------—473-7357 Whiw Copv/lntp^ot't FiU Gold Copv/Siw Notico TO;Planning Commission and Council #461 FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator DATE: SUBJECT: March 6, 1979 #461 William Wear, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard Conditional Use Permit WORK SESSION Mr. Wear proposes leasing a portion of his building for general office space. The entire area of the first floor is 14,400 s.f, A grocery store will occupy 3,600 s.f. and the remainder of 10,800 s.f. is designated for office space use. Now that the building is receiving water service from Long Lake, a sprinkler system will be Installed. The Building Inspector is working with Mr. Wear on the proposed plans. All action on this application must be conditional upon approval of sprinkler system plans. Applicant must also submit plans for interior office construction. There is ampled paved parking around the building. CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Land Use Application • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property^ Address ^^ Y # Legal Description Ti'PE OF REQUEST division $150+$5/Lot AvI /JA l/l.o O/" applicant Name ____^-/>-ri>/*v jn/iyA'n Tel -t Mailing Address 5?w tu/}*^/ir^ _____v.',> />'a J OWNER Name Mailing Address v5*/> /v?A Tel # Present Zoning R/t- jS FEE CMiditional Use $50 Variance $50 Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($65) Date Rec'd By Present Use Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request 3 9" Specify Ordinance Requirements Explain your request and reasons for same /ya ^ (* r/>T fn t’A.'f /'■ r T ff /i C. H S^'^UfC Cyy/‘e'~ C tBA- r^X*^-5____^ VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity _____ Lot^Area _____Setback Front Side Width Other, explain Rear Specify hardships to pro SUBDIVISION af Residential Other, explain No. of Lots CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail (CC/^^Af/P Pca /t.'/7-/<fS, /7/3y c.t’ ti-A.-r a r - C v ^ <1 .vr'A a /C> l/yJ V hjj£.',1 Or r'^.A/c c"/>r A y' P.y e. |g> 7 T/ac H C ^ K'|g' 4 " C A) S,BAbi r/Aj C ^____C* • 3C‘ B, fT* -/7* c A r>P y ____7"/^ ^ ^ '/ MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) Application completed 2. Plat map section 3. y Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal 4. Construction plans, if applicable ( 5. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within (300*) - from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center 6. Stamped, legal sized envelopes(#10 pre-addressed to each of the neunes on the 20x)ve list. DATE DATE / 1 -7 / -< _ _ _ _ _ _ Applicant's Signature OpyA,- _ _ _ _ _ _ Owner's Signature FCj^n Applicant hereby agrees to provide all information'required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all fees as established by ordinance. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5/78 N 1/2 s^j/ <4 o <ocr O 0tn 01 / irr (4400t he ten f Worretf n ifMt S 1. c\J noiti ff«t <4^00! Doneld fru^n nn At « 1 »««. w iiM( i..t« ;;;“ icxni #431 Ooo) 41^1 / W Me ven /WJJ w □ ♦ ipftf liieferm i; ^ppf/ iAiAt. /u M um ’**i«sw aiiMt lOint ■ 1 II ^ "%UtW OSiir ___Qi------± !■- 3lilt •«• t»!•« t« ■? A * ^o*:irn / ----- ir/f t .t a DANIELS ‘iza vS'rma > • •% >\ x> ^ 3 < 0" • ♦#i •»*% •••» tttiiOi -•eetAt perl ei tits: to ^ rti * fiSM) ^ IV Segersirom STREET • II u) \ / .y " oeger Mi* At ] I• ^ 1^ —noo— fiioc) p§ju ■-Ui6 It Met • GREAT NORTHERN • t .iI i ‘ •• « I * « t #461 V* § 11 ;-0» § v» ^5I J • i: I •• 1- • 0 -T c (1 «ft >> 1 ------1^ 1 —f1 •, •_L1=¥=•rt= 1 ' 1 } 1 “ J H* J mcjm DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 0/^0/^ ^ __ DESCRIPTION NAME ADDRESS ^^(< ^ * V ^ > J'L./jAjpji^Tr<s ■^4 - //8- 2 /./ /> A’ I- '^-*■______________ d. 4. /. /.r//*" ^ y / / /, 4 _______* --------------- -7 3 <?? - //B- '2 31 ;^<g_ggZ r//. / /, O'-__'U LOT BLK. PARCEL 3 23j 7£^£P£J£>■/JL 34- //(g-23 L / /L £ /'!., - 3£|>L cI60x.l//t/^ H^- ----- _ V y , W ^^cnp,Ce^\ ^ <c.% c- ^/x —/Aw /A aw -' /^/C< r.dt/i^A7<S^C/^ /PyO/e/<//L> <Qd/-S 7^ 3 j? - // 2 p S:Td7£j^j^.P^P'rA- Oc^AP-77-^ r«pre%ertec ontMs ' C'C cr acffrate end true rif'f'i'S'''’*-^'-'■’CITV I V » ■ - ' 1 • w.r ri-**<» C tntf IUcn S': It trc " 5- • ' • ^ •' _ __L r^cevis Mcnn.;'Tor. 16" uw., ti»ti.t yes! c< Kr.ov.louge and btilvt. Horn. L’ r*» . OoUr /1 /Oapzk 1^32 TO:Planning Commission and Council FROM;Jeanne A. Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator DATE: SUBJECT: March 6, 1979 #465 Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints 850 North Wayzata Boulevard, Joint Conditional Use Permit WORK SESSION Zoning District - RR-IB (Ordinance No. 34.820) Representatives:Joyce Olson - Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints Inge Cici - Day Care Center The applicant has recently purchased a 7-1/2 acre parcel previously owned by the Peace Lutheran Church. They request a Conditional Use Permit to function as a church. At the same time, the applicant requests a permit to lease the building as a Day Care Center. The center will operate from 6:30 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Monday through Friday and will serve a maximum of thirty (30) pupils. The age of pupils will range from 2-1/2 to 6 years of age. Some will attend for a full 8-hour day and others will be on half-day schedules. Staff has met with the State Fire Marshall at the site. Mr. Hanley and the Orono Building Inspector will submit individual reports on safety standards to be followed. There appeared to be no serious problems for the applicant agreed to make all the necessary structural changes. I have been in contact with Carla Brown of the Department of Public Welfare. She informed me that Mrs. Cici's application is being reviewed and she foresees no problem. Mrs. Brown awaits final determination by Orono of the Conditional Use Permit. Mrs. Cici will have r- get approval from the Department of Health as the center will serve lunch ?nd snacks. She will report on this at the Planning Commission meeting on the 12th of March. Note the limited number of requirements for nursery schools in our Zoning Code (Ordinance No. 34.021). The applicant’s plans me .t all of the Zoning requirements. a) Fenced in area setback Required: 15' - Proposed: 80' b) Playground space per pupil Required: 50 s.f. - Proposed: 83 s. f. ^organized Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints Joint Conditional Use Permit Page 2 submitted have not been received. t 1 ‘ i / J m rtiTsi rcM»I9J r»T7SI mm •T3^ /\/ / \\ \\\ . k */t c5 Ci. O Q X csl *4 11 So O (S' (? ■2 tyi >* 5fiS. M f >r 5;Sn £1.65 00 3 te v:: i! ■X d 3 ■1 >b J tii J h,8-,B 0 1 'o 1 0 to \11 •» ii) J Qean Mabt TO Giiy of" Ofoi P. 0. Go hh LC-Tyr>fa( <3r<y,Mn 5*3. #465 FE£) 0 1979 Srcun o i-^icenSn'y Cotyudhnf’ suijECT: Ptn^,rx<^prl J^i STATE OF MINNESOTA OWARTMINT OF FUOLIC tMLFARf CINTINNIAL OFFWt MNUNNO ClTx''l)fi ORONQ fT. PAUL. MINNESOTA 66166 J ’t^nren ______PATE: \ to o'n/^cvrn^' (JCLL. xJuni" (Icidcic/rd cx. p. i-opc-ciccC, ca/ik^ (iavit'V t-Vu^ o^cJAi ')ao\.^ (i/'Ut'XcA ^9s'C L.cup^^k. &tvd . bC iUoL-tid- ^u.s::>v_' 0. Ckoi- Xc- t4^-j /3x>n.o^< to CL-ncL. JxL^Cih c<-pp->iKa.p QconpicAm/:- ic<ti\. cCJi atcao c^. ^jypLU hltCsL S.■/ SIGNEDOn 4i Bat AN fOUAL OAPOATUNITV fMAlOVEA tUXTi^ 44-77) ¥ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Comniission and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth» Asst. Zoning Administrator I March 2, 1979 Kern Hoppe, 950 Sixth Avenue North Subdivision f . SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Zoning District RR-IB oS^in'a new^ccess pera.lt fro. the County hxghwsy dGpsrtin6nt• // -r. CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Land Use Application • TYPE OF REQUEST LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property) Subdivision $150+$5/Iot Address Legal Description m m APPLICANT Eam&DC. Tel mnru- OWNER Namg 1)C . /h Tel ^ FEE ^1* 7 Md“"I onditional Use $50 Sriance $50 Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($65) Date Rec' d ^ “ Aim ^ By ^ Present Zoning ^Present Use ^ Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request 3 *** ^Specify Ordinance Requirements ^ ^ filit m.t tm m. Isf^ €/<»«*• Explain your request and reasons for same VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity it Area _ _ _ Setback Front_ _ Side Other, explain _ _ _ _ _ Rear Specify hardships SUBDIVISION application Residential Other, explain No. of Lots CQNDITI9NAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) ^L. • 4. Application completed Plat map section Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal Construction plans, if applicable 5.Certified P.operty CVner*s list of owners within (300') from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#1C pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list DATE Applicant's Signature DATE ^ -«P'^ -S /} CXmer's Signature Applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all fees as established by ordinance. .:5/78 Ml % u / .*« ■• * • % I nj !• * II Hf i V i ! ^.i !ii 1 Bta.•Vf u> ___uM ; ■' 3 I Si, fSi * . •!*• ^• ^ ' '\ ' I fi t 1 */L ^ i \ J, u \ |i li I lUi ■« V TO: FROM: Planning Comniission and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator DATE:March 7, 1979 SUBJECT: Cary Petersen, 1340 Baldur Park Road - SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW - Zoning District LR-IC The applicant proposes dividing a 2-3/4 acre parcel into three ots located at the end of the Baldur Park peninsula. The plat is to be served by a private road to be designated as an outlet. The property has severe building limitations. First, the flood plain (all land below the 931.5 contour) excludes a large portion of the buildable land). Second, the 75' lakeshore setback surrounding the peninsula places another severe restriction. The property is sewered. Lot configuration: A three lot division will require many severe variances to the Code. The property owner, Mrs. Olson, should include her lot in the plat because of the access road serving the property. It may be necessary to move southern lot line to give her house the necessary 10' setback. Access road: Access road must abutt all the lots in a formal plat. It appears Lot 1 will be served by a private easement running ^om cul-de-sac through Lot 2. The road will require a variance. The road outlot may be reduced to 20' because of future limited use. Sewer: Sewer is available. Mrs. Olson must hookup to the sewer by this summer. Planning Commission must approve three new sewer units and a possible fourth depending on Planning Commission findings. ■466 nistrator . Road - SUBDIVISION parcel into three lots la. The plat is to be an outlet. The property lood plain (all land tion of the buildable rounding the peninsula >rty is sewered. require many sgvgit© Irs. Olson, should zeess road serving the gt*n lot line to gi^® Lots in a formal plat, sasement running from ire a variance. The future limited use. hookup to the sewer rove three new sewer ning Commission findings. Cl'lT OF ORONO, filKKESOTA Land Use Application • « j ‘location of proposal (or Address ya»L\.Q Legal Description V-cV- applicant Name_Gi^^V^^' Mailing _ ^ _ ra. v Address .“Ss \ ^ A^A CWNER Name - - - - - - Mailing Tel Address Present Zoning - - - - - - - - - - ^ type of REQUEST I,/ Subdivision $150+$5/lot * __ Conditional Use $5C _ Variance $50 ^ _ Fc^oning $250 _ Riprap $15 ($65) fee_^O Date R^' d__^r,2i^r2L^ By Present Use VV-.'v\t fvA— Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request Specify Ordinance Requirements Explain your request and reasons for same ■ nOTt:,-0 - - - - -- VARIANCE SW® _ _ _ Other, explain _ _ _!- - Rear Width Specify hardshipstfe-ijroperty i/SUBDIVISION application Residential Other, explain No. of Lots ..3 CONDITION^USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail minimum material necessary for COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be ”ted 10 days prior to Planning Conaaissron meeting) 1. Application completed yi. Plat map section 3, Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal A Construqtion plan&r—if—appiicab 1 e 5. vC. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within (300*) (%#9^)- from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center| 6. / Stamped, legal sized envelopes(#101 pre-addressed to each of the names! on the above list. Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature '~ V DATE_bi3A:i:l^ namp /- '■ z' ' uwner s signai-ui-c ~ - -- - - --- -^^ \ f w^rebv aareeT to provide all information^equired or requested byApplicant hereby agrees rop Attorney, Plaiming Commission ^d rrc!l^e“sfa” prLLs ?his application and further agrees to pay all fees as established by ordinance. 4 \ SKETCH FOR GARY P. PETERSON OF LOTS 22-29, 31-33, AND PART OF 21. 0ALDUR PARK " #466 Dsarrlpllon: . ^ *04 %l 10 %% ^ laclualv*. An4 Let 21 eirep* f>*« pert U«r««f 4eeerlhe^ •• f'*lloeet ^frtnnlnr oe /U •Mfi'ter line et ihm ro*^r of eeJ4 Let 21; tb*rr» oe ••I'* lie* • dl#te»*re of V» feet tr L/• %#»-•» »*rr»«r of ••!<! Lot 211 r^-eoee ‘>rt> eee'^rl* ^ U»e ierti- eotierlj Hr* rf p«l^ r* 21 • *»1>. n*# ef 2J fee*; thenre S«nithee»t*rl/ V i tr'Ir*. or> i.ie Sout» •^••erl> lire of eel'* U)i 21 d!»Lee* ScuC ter l« frr»* ■••.*• m.rt/****Wrir rerf»er; *J •t •‘t Kc.**>«^«**rlr •• •*erlr line ,* 'eel tr tr« wtr* »*' •!! ?r ►Ic^- 1. •'•:*Mr i*«»**. Toret/*r with ell o •• Ir '»*»•» eH* *fji* falft of Irlv Voul#r«ri^. | ' Jr Wr»rf J orl» •liorrjoe ef •►e Mi* -* ••tc »r* 21. *c t/** tl«* tforeof OP 'tie *r< o* ••r**** Jr e^r1**«r •»* >eip »t «iv« for ••l‘* ••oe«rlF etrfv*a^if Dvrer rer» >, |'*UT««r . %i. rt‘*fe «*r^**, •^•.rd, •»Jn»i»** •* * Sur^e\* •: e>r»*r»r |i, U»*'|* |J>* Mrie'i, %*••. »lij«*er**. *• •*• 93/, ^ Sceloi 1 Jpr|| t V* #•#'». r^^fflo Aer. te. MIKA Alelo d. *ieh'tor Aef. In.lU^ »«od Serrejcre *011 W#1r*er« Lett# U»*e. •*Jtr»»eeW 3 I * Lire%» r«rOd> iW tOe eetf it«i I •» • ^ PM*e« i '3 y o t 'AfZK^ Plht cf Siir''cy for Ccjrj- f. Pcterccn of lot 3C, Elccic 1, Bf Id'jr Park Keraj(.*plr. Cc'^ty, Kirjicsotii fA v>f C'to U Zne/’v/e/ pta') €joncr£.fg (k and Certificate of Sunroj: I hereby ccrtifir that thi5 is a true and correct reprer.'^nlatlcn of a surrey of the boimdaries of Lot }0, Elock 1, ’’Baldur Park**, end the location cf ail existing building thereon. It does not purport to show other Inorovesienti or enci-oachjLects. Scale: 1*^ = 50» late : ^-2-78 c : Iren isirker Ooroon J\. Coffin Re Land Surve\*cr smd Plarner LOBg Lake, Minnesota 1 .V ' ' - 4 TO: FROM; DATE: Planning Commission, Council, Walter Benson, & IRC Planner? Alan P. Olson, City Planner March 6, 1979 SUBJECT: North Central Study Area As a continuing part of our comprehensive plan review, I recommend that we next study the area shown on the attached map, generally bounded by Long Lake to the east, Medina to the north, Orono Schools on the west and the BN tracks on the south. There are several reasons which suggest that this area receive detailed analysis before completion of our Comprehensive Plan: 1. The change in MNDOT highway plans for TH12. 2. The pending construction of the Orono "Ring Route" link which may affect traffic on both TH12 and CR6. 3. The relatively new plans of Medina to sewer Medina-Morningside by means of a connection to the existing Orono line in Old Crystal Bay Road. A by-product of this work may include allocation or reallocation of sewer units in this area. 4. This area includes Orono's Industrial enterprises. The two major industries have recently expanded and the City should review their plans for future growth and/or the need for other industries to locate in the area. 5. Application 433 suggests a rezoning for new commercial/industrial uses on land currently unsewered. The feasibility of a sewer extension, or arrangements for connection to the Long Lake System, should be studied This also applies to the existing B-1 area north of TH12 and west of Brown Road which is also unsewered. 6. The land north of TH12 between Willow and Old Crystal Bay Roads is designated for multi-family on the 1974 plan. In view of land use developments, policy changes and the Medina sewer connection, this designation should be reviewed for conformity with current policy. The area is not in Orono*s sewer service area, but it already his some assessments and perhaps could have more. Is multi-family relevant? If so, over what area or what percentage of the area? At what maximum density? Given available, or future, sewer capacity, perhaps the maximum density can occur over only cart of the area. What options are available? March 6, 1979 North Central Study Area Page 2 7, There are several very large tracts of land still completely undeveloped. The City should review and restate current policy to guide any and all development in the coming years. 8. The area includes the new DNR acquisition of Wolsfeld Woods. The effect on Orono and on the immediate neighboring properties should be reviewed. For all these reasons and likely others yet to surface, I believe a review of this area deserves early priority. I recommend the Planning Comnission call a public hearing for residents and affected parties, probably at the first meeting in April. ^ I recommend the Council consider adoption of a moratorium ordinance for the area to prohibit new building permit and new subdivision applications. I see no immediate reason to stop review of any of the applications now pending. Succtsreo ce^fiTiaL sjOiffy JfiolthAj 3-A-7?_________________ VILLMIE OF OMNO W t.M| ---------; ................................. •riLUAM T MILLS Telephone 473-7357 March 5, 1979 CITYofORONO Post OfTice Box 66•Crystal Bay. Minnesota 5S323*Municipal OfTicea On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka Mrs. J. Frank Ecklund 1200 Brackett's Point Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mrs. Ecklund: Thank you for your letter regarding the annual septic system program. Orono has throughout the years been forced to provide sanitary sewer for certain dense areas in the lake area because of failing septic systems that were not maintained properly. There is no question that some of these areas required City sanitary sewers because of severe water table problems. It has been our experience in recent years that the cost to install public sewers has become ver^.^ expensive and in some cases prohibitive. It has also been our experience that of the many septic systems in operation very few are maintained properly, if at all, until a severe problem arises which generates a public outcry for public sewers. For these reasons, the City Co'uncil implemented an inspection program designed-to benefit each homeowner who owns a septic system. The benefits from this $25.00 yearly charge are: 1. Yearly inspection of septic systems 2. A record in the City Hall of the owners system, location and design 3. Availability of personnel when systems fail 4. An assurance that all systems are constructed property, and failing systems are repaired 5. No large sanitary sewer assessment Mrs. J, Frank Ecklund March 5/ 1979 Page 2 We do not know when the tine will cone when we will be forced to provide City sanitary sewer in your area, but the cost will certainly be significant. Our last project in 1974 cost the honeowners approxinately $6,500 each. For these reasons, we beliovc that $25.00 per year is a small price to pay to assure that all on-site systems are operating properly or until such tine that City sewer is mandatory. I would like to assure you that it is not our intention to create any undo hardship for our residents and we are open to any suggestions you might have on this matter or any other City policy. Please feel free to call me at my office, 473-7357, if you have any comments as I would be happy to meet with you at your convenience. Sincerely, "Twv^* j. frank eckluno 1200 BRACKETT S POINT ROAD WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 . ! T1 ;ji^ /a-1^ **-I4^' ->Xc 'yjk^ <?>* i-<^| 9 d^ C^ ~~>4/\. 4. *jjt , “ :-K-a .v-jU'-Jllt , '-<-*-^ 'T- ck i-L^ *XX^ ^ /^-»» —A.-C, >*-^A. ^ iL_^ A • ■ 4--*^ - ■*■♦ CL o_JL I • c f-5-fe--^^***''^—> KRHilfiiil lt:s. I? a-J q Hi f-.Hjnr;;;; ;»• JI W PQ€UMINA0Y f^AT OF \X»45 tMuas oUHllE[j> -----r ■ r Y"’ r 1 SneLOUs 2md additiohm rr an or ObVCLOPeO Mb . John Pert Jd900 HlGHiANQ AvcNue PeePHAveN . Mn 5539! Z A -___li, a. MM pQFPAoeD By BcHoeiL & MaoaoM. M €ng!Needs Sr Suevey'offs Hopkins tar*.* int.t A)f W~'^' ju 'mr. p JT' ^^:C- nil i li ^ H V C X >w: 1 * •. 1 ^• j>' “* '. y 4■ '‘HIOil -^.-U ^ U- ■* ■- . ; 1 r- ^ - - . _ jP V •. r am^£^LML*m€i^ s V