The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-07-1980 Planning PacketL I n^. •*AGENDA Planning Commission Meeting Monday, July 7, 1980 Council Chambers 7:30 P. M. A \ CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL 1. Call to Order & Roll ACTION ITEMS 2. #561 Kellers Market, 3800 Wayzata Boulevard - Variance/ Conditional Use Permit 3. #569 Peter Switenki, 4510 North Shore Drive - Conditional Use Permit WORK SESSION 4. #570 William Z. Mernik, 2715 Kelly Ave. - Subdivision 5. #571 Gregg Hannah, 3185 North Shore Drive - Subdivision SKETCH PLAN 6. #568 Daryle Uphoff, 24197/2499 & 2501/2503 Kelly Ave Subdivision INFORMATION ITEMS 7. Orono Comprehensive Plan > Planning Commission Comments 8. Zoning Administrator's Update of the Cortlen Cloutier Application #555 Variance/ Conditional Use Permit APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES 9. Meeting of . June 23, 1980 ■ i . t on Z 3X0 g MOO p xao Q City of Orono, Wfinnesota Street Numbering IndeK Map LTTs^ s- ”fe*^■TTp! iM 4ft ri L' TOS Planning Comnlsslon and Council pg(]llj Jeanna Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE; July 2, 1980 SUBJECT; #561 Kellers Market, 3800 Wayaata Blvd. Variance and Conditional Use Permit Staff Comments - Action Meeting, July 7, 1980 n.... r.vl« th. FUnoer'. Mterlal .nclosad to th. June J3ri packet. nigbt if you have any questions or require additional McDonald aakad for a co.parl.on betnaan th. uae In regard to tha burden on operation could Involve determine since a greenhouse and It is staff's opinionexcessive use of water comparable to residential use. it is that they are similar in water use. S^ry ot conclualon. Of Fl*""‘”|/.7 ‘“i"l‘on rfTnorcon™ i;. rsjct^f :t::ct:r:“»Tn1.;urn?i:i‘aona (ravla. Mlnna.ota Supreme Court Decisions). 2- Planning Commission seemed to ^^" ®®'*^®"f^u^t/vegetable sales IlSou’^'a'E'tton;? u*a'ptr.U va. never granted to th. pr.vlou. owners. 3- A full meat department no ^"® ^„3®oi®of*'a‘^noi-^existing and/or proposed structure is an expansion use. 4- Change in occupancy from residential-commercial to commercial use is a change in the original non conforming use. ' _j . review of the access must5- If Improvements are approved, a complete be reviewed by the City Engineer. Mlk. oaffrc ha. advl.edj« ^Igt a * and review otHmter treatment on facility.new septic system 1 hava never received a cop, of the .ft. plan a. Mr. MUegarver pro.U.d. r;y I and the accooipanyini; Ll before the meeting information. >rcial and residential s is difficult to ition could involve It is staff's opinion recent work session- of a non-conforming ne (review Minnesota t that "greenhouse Eruit/vegetable sales ted to the previous located within the >n of a non-conforming cial to commercial use (view of the access must nt use would require a cility. I Mr. Wisegarver promised. HC 1233-PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 'r OEPARTMeNT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 LIST Size FEE OWNER qj.ieeMSff L Orr£A/ 9mn: ffu^y 3,fi. Cf3s^f//s*r/ du^fffaO L. OTfSA/ <intTK /L// Srtvp^l /? I CCSTIPV THST THE FACTS ReWS^S^TlS'O^ THtsE|^ CCRTIFICATE ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE RCRRE- SCNTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT AFFEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HCNNCFIN COUNTT FINANCE DIVISION, TO THE SCST OF MV RNOWLCOOE AND BCUCF. NCNNCFIN CO. FlHANCC-JUXiSION _____________ _ naTT ~ TAX PAYER/ MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS ^9/T> \dJ^y^ATA hut/a /exvf 44yjt U//3'¥-^Afp. Ai//> i^F9L>n^\jl//9vrj9n9 0j.t/A 3^-99/ L-£>/y£ U/avzj^ fk^/) '97.- fttHfo'U. y/ZAVTA/Xf Aadg . - ^ - kJAYZ.Af»i l?90 CAAAZ£>fia/A — CffVf^LA^TTeP’- 3960 ^7 - //^ - * ^FFHA/^0 .lllAl • Mi ____ t,—^la loan VILLAGE Of ORONO 9<!a> \l//i'YZJ9^r/t R-l/d b/^ ^79l> (tAf9ZJ9/3> >g>-/yy7 // 972-^- // ^ /^/y/e7*Y OOQj, tfOtA 0ao4 ^£>C* cex>i 45><F^ ^C>0' I OCfO 000. m •.1 I'- TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission, and City Council Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator July 3, 1980 |56» Peter svitenkl,.4510 North Shore Drive Conditional Use Permit shore e mark. I hod originally refused the DNR Pemit requesting se^^ and I nave « _ _ _ ,,onatruction-and I have accepter* «» -- - - - ^ - _d_nlans for the seiiss Ks?iS"3—erosion proDxero» — ir--- - 4- Mr I have asked the game warden to inspect .^''J^®"oncSn'*that*the sew- ^ exoert on such matters# I mrive over to the neig^* finally gave up. The trap^r s problem. *nd that trapping was never going„a that tr.ppi..g our monday meeting, the following: X. ’IS this the only feasible method to control muskrats on site. 2. potential of damage to neighboring properties vwMNS* a«*framjww r CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Land Use Application * LOCATIGN OP PROPOSAL (or property) Address HlfiO Legal Description V Idiotic, i !• 'nj APPLICANT Name Pe.t«»c. n- ^ L . Mailing Tel # tM /7 PE OP APPLICATION KAch Plan Review $50 ivision 50 + $10/Lot Conditional Use Permit U^$30.00 ^ $50.00 Address S,I f ) ^ ^ ^ ^ t */ OWNER Name • - ^ t- ti Mailing N t .•Tel Address , /J- -f . ti-,; ' t «' Rezoning $250 ] Vacation $100 (Minimum)” 3Bf f/.37 ^FEE Date Rec'd By _ _ _ _ _ Present Zoning »■- - - - - -> •ir (Present Use i Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request Specify Ordinance Requirements _ _ _ _ _ _* < Explain your request a’^.d reasons for same < mm 7 VARIANCE rcMjuired - extent of nonconformity _ _ _ Lot Area _ _ _ Setback Front_ _ _ _ Other* explain _ Side Rear Width r Specify hardships to property SUBDIVISION application Residential Other* explain No. of Lots c. ^ • CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail - ^ ^ > t* ..T *f.*.'* t.{ .# 4 . I • <1 w -r *• f ^ w »- - - -- ^ I k;. ‘ —!:- -- - - f 4 c r. s iu.»^ w c ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ T f • /"<_^ - -_£_ _* * • *5 ♦ * ptt. •• i 4 •'•-t *1 ■ - <. V »»<• M - -- - - - -< • t,._ _||-» ■ r ‘ ’♦’•.r A<w.t<C • M *. tf • ■ ' • ^ *X j[ •».'t "Iwc •»*. '» «,3f r\-« ( r. ) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATI (Must be submitted 10 daya prior to Planning Coimnission meeting) ( Application completed Plat map section Certificate of sxirvey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal Construction plans* if applicable Certified Property Owner's list owners within (300*) from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center Stamped* legal sized envelopes(#1 pre-addressed to each of the name, on the above list. DATE • - /.•. .'I f • /Applicant's Signature J ■r v/. DATE 0»mer's Signature Applicant hereby agrees to provide all information requ^ed or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pa^ aXl fees as established by ordinance. 5/78 HC l^:i3 i OE^KfMEMT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY 0V;NERS LIST 0^yUjU;t /f O'ZONO LIST Size ?>oo- FEE OWNER I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESCNTEO ON THIS CfRTIFtCATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE- ATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY Ce DIVISION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE BELIEF. HENNEPIN CO. FINANCE DIVISION DATE X PAYER/ MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS ir- !■>! FPeL-VHNT S'7 T-'/n 12.-Z5> ^0-31 AtCU Vl> i S-o Z/.F4j \jj. >rrzi4 - toiE-DHurc^r Tr^ Michael j . TiTZ(2afcTgAL.D> (3^.. s S''^ ST ^54 ^6tCT t.. Bl ZKElAf^D I > VL'^^s-^oz 1I g • un L u \\u'V R Tgfgg- C. SUJiT£NiCI ,Jg- Qg£g.t 1. 'BITLVG5LAND 4rJ/0 /vrfdlH rjM.vKL J;;* ;Vcre.T7V C.».oz.(£- r>!:z Yi-ATlti i-K- *PAl^UCA/gR>yK\i .c H f-_ "Thomas a . STAi;pehiE>eEG> OyKAl.CH hgZ/Z- HUM! VT /M PLS OHUMTiOLPT ,4VL \Z76 - fi^lLr>HUE-LT TR )! Nil's /vIa itll -ry)6>- A'CiVi JiK 44a/ A'CIIIH r^M6'ilG JjR 3. <^UilglF<;^RWFPl ^ '\AAtTi/iAi A -TLlerictTK/ . > NCliWt SnOR.0. Z*TL 44S'I-/\/CK-I?f SM^Z.Ci. t>TL .MAZIOA/ a THEVSEN s^S.‘s9I^C i.y: HEKILV J. ~El&6LHOF A'^f(*1l! SH&liC l-g i t / / KATgQLb ALI!>1?jECHT 3>h^T?.e- ^7^ DAA/IEL A. T>EAWTreC»<TCHST ft Cl-R. JAC.1C e. veu^-z-flf. lUlLMAM - TL-Sl VI cn< 46 - r in OR. CAlg£l£ MAZTI »3Z6 VLt.T VI- CiR. TOoPEirr/ ioti I irt'iKiti ft O^ONO__________ rHAT THE FACTS REPRCSENTEO ON THIS ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE RCPRC- OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS I RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY nSION. TO THE BEST OF MV KNOWLEOCE 0. FINANCE DIVISION . M>Tr PROPERTY ADDRESSir- i.>i rr-eiT^HNT 1C ) n\/\2 2 n!a Z 3 ^ *VFJ(p- A'C-i iH Z)\'^V(^ JiR g 4‘Ui/ N0\z.]rv rzwtVG I3R. -^4S'J - NCE.1}\- < i t i 1 2 2 r 1 •PE.OPE12.T/ Y W \ \ i?2v^ •'f^ \ »3 ‘ \\ '.A. ‘V\ .’ir 1*^ "'V) «• ~,‘9 T ^Lii. “1 -?r.< * \' _ • <> ..A'' :.\ t'/y •30'^- '•• u=^ • -VS •^♦s' ,n>.. • ;- :,• \ . ’ w y-r X*) is*. 0.'S-T ?•: V* V y - V • • V r*' * ' i<"' »r- •=* /i #, v.y' ^0 .oT. «v'- *» .• /rL /«i /% —--y / ✓:r \ • # • !^'to / f 5 .r- V. V I4f V y / r/^Ji •- •«.. *«M % ■<of - o?" ‘ “•/ X^' i - r/-^i|..-IW Ac:<fuu- •-*. 'f . ^f/oW \y 'X V \ V 'O' < J« / / /:rSSA v^' Z-Ji V o>- / / ^--<-* •#.ff ' *1^ - -------J[£.\______ •**' ^ \ /• ■* .•i* w« "v? / \ • ;rT/ \\ ■ \' &"&/ &j/IT'': .• V<- /• . '•■ /v'■ -if-.. ,> "'S'- } / MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387. Wayuta. MinnesoU 55391 worn Of MMMtOI: OmM H. CMiiraii« ft«. • AIM L UI mbm • A mim S. RmmII • Mm I. TMm • A««tor« 6 im MINNtlONIA i I, - ' utm, ft/j I:'*-;.-' tuf V. n ^ n rr* p*" ^ D..'.-’' 'H' J'-!- : ::;d I i U/ July 1, 1980 Mr. Peter C- c!l^itenki CtDC QE OJ^ONQ H510 North Snot*»j Drive Hound, MN 55364 Re: Permit Application No. 80-40 Location: 4510 North Shore Drive, Forest Lake - Orono Purpose: Shoreline Stabilization with Sheet Piling. Dear Hr. Switenki: At its meeting on June 19, 1980, the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District reviewed the subject permit application. It approved the permit as requested with the following conditions: All work shall be done in a manner to prevent erosion and siltation both during and after construction in accordance with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Guidelines, a copy of which is enclosed. 2) All work shall conform to the requirements of the City of Orono aiici the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Approval is granted under Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Rules F and K. Permits are valid for one year 4 Page 2 Nr. Peter C. Swltenkl July 1, I960 ifs t S t < Please oontaet us at MTB-MPPil when the project is about to oob' Bence so an Inspector Bay view the work in progress. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers tor the DistrictI for the Di;Ljla E. A. Hiokok, P.E. President EAH:lf Enclosure oc: D. Cochran G. MacoBber A. Olson, Orono K. LokkesBoe, NDNR F. Hlxa, LMCD V • *‘ ► T !, ! ♦ .-i • T V " U ■ ^ V i ::Clf ^ rM ^ fy • ^ ' ♦*s. . ' • ^ f & . >;V, r " , V ' •»-!' r. »’>srVe ' ♦ fc. ‘ V.J 4K V , K v'r'- 1 ’-v'j t’r '■ ■' M ON<(S PHONE: A) (!•«U STATE Of 'lN]D^[iS©‘Tr^ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MetSo R^ion feters, 1200 V/arner Road, St, Paul, MN 55106 296-7523___ »/ Fil* No. June 6, 1980 (fr, Peter C, Swltenki A510 North Shore Drive Orono, Minnesota 5536A 7'* ' - ‘-= 'u nr\ • ^ «••• ii- u 1=, I 1lu lUJ RE:PERMIT APRICATION 80-6241, SHORE PROTECTIWi LAKE MINNETONKA, HENNEPIN COUNTY ClI^ Co ORO!^ Dear Mr, Switenki: Attached is a copy of the recomnendation from the City of Orono ^d a copy of Minnesota Public Waters and Wetlands Permit Program, which indicates .that no permit is required from the KIR to place natural rock riprap for shore protection. An informational pamphlet explain ing riprap is also enclosed, .DNR*s permit program requires that local. . approvals .be obtained by the applicant. It does not app^ ^t apj^val for a retaining wall will be forthcoming from the city. Based on ^ city's cooments and on DNR policy, it appears that your permit applica tion for a retaining wall would be denied. Please advise our office within two weeks of receipt of this letter which method of shcare. protection you propose to pursue. At that time, we will finalize your file. It is also noted that the copy of the plat indicates that Lot Block #1 Wildhurst Tfail contains 53 feet of shoreline on Forest Lakei this may have changed however, as the shoreline area may have been excavated under a pre vious permit, which would increase the shoreline of Lot #4. If you have any questions pertaining to this matter, please feel ft*ee to call roe at your convenience. Sincerely, ait LokkferooeKent Regional Hydrologist Kl^RS/ch Atl^^hroent cc: City of Orono ■ AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER •;< w-221 C. D. Any possible effects.of the proposed pro'ect on the water resource, navigation, fish and wildlife, conservation, pollution, and the general public interest. Any reconmended modifications in the proposal or other alternative way of achieving the desired objective which would reduce undesira e effects. . , E. Any pertinent factual data available concerning the water body or t proposed project. P. Reasons for any local objections. Please comlete this form and return to the address shown in the lower left corner o this page within 15 days, if possible, or inform the department if additional time is needed. t SECTION II (TO BE COMPLETED BY CHT, TOVESHIP, WATERSHED DISTRICT OR COUNTY) The applicant named on the opposite side of this form submitted a copy of his water permit application on are submitted for 19 . It has been reviewed and the following comments sStuJ idevation by the liepartment of Natural Resources ^ AAAJttZj, /Htu . 'Ctl) (Attach adiitianal sheato if neoeeeary)Dated 19 RETURN TO: Gov*t Official's name A. (print or typa) DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOUKulS Division of Waters Regulations Unit Centennial Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Signature Title Address f. o. (•Co. _________________________________________________________________■ ---__________________ ifc\III* taiMii __________ i: I I Y Ut OKUNU* MlNNl:-bOTA 1 ■t I li t >«/>,« i«M^------------ CITY OF ORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO. CALLEO-IN SCHEDULED COMPLETED ADDRESS /J/> ,S/> i^-/7-<5o P^eae.. OWNER TELEPHONE NO. CONTR. □□□ Q i FOOTING FRAMING INSULATION WALL BO. O TINAL O PROGRESS OEMOL FIRE PREV. □□ □□□□ O□□o PLUMBING Rl MECHANICAL WATER HOOKUP METER SET/TURN ON SEWER HOOKUP SEPTIC INSTALL SEPTIC MAINT. WELL TEST PUMP ^^SITE INSPECTION ^ EXCAV./GRAOING/FILLINI □ LAKESHORE/WETLANOS □ LICENSING □ COMPLAINT □ FOLLOW-UP O SEPTIC FINAL□ __ COMMENTS; 5 ^SaAJ/c:_/V/ 5I 8 ^ I nnu “t^Aor: ^TVlP.Va V\As/g bac.icr —A.*^ s Ul 12I iS 12 s U j § 'j 2 HIS?'' SATISFACTORY: PROCEED n ph OTQ TAitPUO CORRECT WORK * PROCEED ^ PHOTO TAKEN o “oTorLer hours °Jns 5e^^^ will return . D INSPECTION REOUIREO. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. ctll for tht next inspection 24 hours in advance. Owner/Contr. on site ____ ^—>_______ Inspector 473-7357 Whitt Copv/bttpMtor't Fitt Gold Copv/SItt Notica r i*^|-4*V I IK iTCl »Mf I MIMNKS;CI*I*A '.A ..t: # I:: TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Coomission and Council C‘' Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator July 2, 1980 SUBJECT: #570 William Z. Mernik, 2715 Kelly Ave. -Subdivision Work Session Application - Subdivision - Plat 2 lots Lot 1*1 l/2acres Lot 2 ■> 2 acres Total Acreage ■ 3 1/2 acres Mr. Mernik proposes a 2 lot plat of his 3 1/2 acre parcel. There are no designated wetlands involved but there appears to be a local drainage collection area located near to the proposed lot line and will be reviewed in depth later in the preliminary phase of application. The existing structures Bieet the setback from the proposed lot line. A private driveway and utility easement must be granted by Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2. The existing driveway appears to run along the southern edge of the plat, access to the plat appears to be via a City owned 30’ x 150' wide tract. The City attorney will advise on this issue. i*r f ■t III KSil l'l»A e-- • •Subdivision acre parcel. There ts to be a local drainage ne and will be reviewed Lon. The existing structures i^ate driveway and utility The existing driveway access to the plat appears City attorney will advise Land Use Application LOCATION OP PROPOSAL (or property) Address .^0/^ h^//v /At C tcvA p^nn. f-O" Legal Description 'J,'3 /YC.Q. APPLICANT Nain e///>/.?/>, 7 //A K' Tel Mailing , ^ Address kt //v C/Cc'A>'cr,/7'?,tuj / OWNER Name Z. Tel Address 5 Acr/v/%-t-. CXce kicr, )>t nn r-S~?'?Y TYPE OF REQUEST $io7ooJ Lo1 Present Zoning /A- Y/^ Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($65) FEE^y^ ^ Date Rec*d Y* YL Thy By A Present Use Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request _ _ _ _ Specify Ordinance Requirements ) A-Cuf A/tf't/.M Explain vour reauest and reasons for same o'!AIs ^ ll U 1 (cnw VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity _ _ Lot Area _ _Setback Front Width Side Rear Other, explain Specify hardships to property r 1 SUBDIVISION application oZ. Residential Other, explain No. of Lots /Z. CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER > explain proposed use of property in detail MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) Application completed 2. Plat map section Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of _ __ _ _ _ _ _ proposal Stamped, legal sized envelopes (# 4. Construction plans, if applicable ^ pre-addressed to each of the naro on the above list. Certified Property ^ner * s list ovmers within <^00^ ttSSI- frOTi| Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center DATE^^ DATE .. f< . r ■ -?/k SO Applicant's Signature $7/V ) 6 Owner's Signature // '/^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Applicant hereby agrees to provide all information^required or requested by Ihe Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this duplication and further agrees to pay all fees as established by ordinance. 5/78 TYPE OF REOU^T ^ vt«OJl^^^r9«^d$10.002 Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($65) FEE^y *^/i * ^ ^ 4s^ Date Rec'd V A Th^ Use hSi^ <cny (Sf (6^g ide Rear Other, explain No. of lots ^ le of property in detail LETE APPLICATION 1 Coimnission meeting) :ti£ied Property Owner * s list o lers within ((300^ froo^ inepin Oo. Dept, of Finance ^03 Government Center &mped, legal sized envelopes(#1 e-addressed to each of the name the above list. ^ It^on^required or requested by Attorney, Planning Commission CITX 0^, DRQNQ '• I III,' y I, •! ' •••.’s.“\ «TV c I TO:Planning Coonlasion and Council FROM:Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: July 2, 1980 SUBJECT: #571 Gregg S. Hannah , 1406 Bohns Point Road - Subdivision Application — Subdivision -- Metes and bounds survey — lot line realignment Zoning District - LR-IB Mr. Hannah proposes a metes and bounds division of Darrell K. Stewart s property to the east of his lot. As the applicant explains the realignment will "reflect natural topographic lot lines". The subject area has been maintained by Hannah for many years. Staff sees no problem with the sub division. As usual a condition of approval will be that Parcel A must be combined with the Hannah lot. A public information meeting has been scheduled for July 21, 1980 at 7:45 P.M. V ti/A 4^f -f ’ «?'- '4 .4 • *“ T t^;SP*.; r ,m ' V-.w y „ •'9 • >(*• - "v ' mm PSk'-'t';' liM^'’' •Hill >Htr7:i •Ma(« 9^1 - fei>y Srevt ■'.>..ite%' Wj5 [•m:j [•mwrni af 1 i 1 . • ' ‘j. ^ K SCALi: 11NCH. JOHN J. RYAN CO. 1b9b StLBV AVtNUi. ST ^AUl »>04 .«n PLAT OF SUR> 11 OF PROPERTY OF n J LOCATION /7P//3/2- .LOWS _7^ ^ ^ ^OfSCRiBCD AS K>aOWS ___A/^^24 A^r^y_^ .■■ h •■/> i'»-^ T 97./ ii ^1 6 r.* f /► I r; w / ^ \ I *«V '1 ' 1 IN IS' I 'J t:i e>y- • > I •**, 0\ I i 7/^^CT Jh i I i /^^r>o z? I /CO _________ n /•L « 4 v5fl«.C CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION OF BUILDING I h»rfby e0TUty that on ^ **^-- *• ^ - CERTIFICATE OP SURY'EY I hereby certify iJiit so thii pur^'ey. pkn. or rrport wet prepered by mr or onder my dw0<t tupervitiofi aiMl thei 1 am a duly IU|n»iered Land Sur* pveyor undar ibr Uwt of the State of MianaaoU Uut aurvay. pk*. or topori waa praparaJ by M ar dirart auparviaioii and that 1 am a duly Bafiatarad Surveyor under Uir kwa of the Steit of MtnnaaoU. 'nalliyiffr'*< okt'; alLJA. A AL.ibi>aHl/;w.i*.... <nhI ■1' III)' r' iH r -PM, ITT• t or ‘Vur^^r»y Tor i r ,•; . :: -5.i. i’i r? rl :, .1- t;; * t' .• ^ . . r Hen: ir 'Iriji.t/, :.ii •. V*'* \-s\0 M511 I i-A- ,v ii' — nS J 27 9 *T 2 41*o E-just ‘"1 Mow*C;2 \ .......... Cb 1 . 2B Z riwr rrTT l(p|5 Z t34 Ufc 5 MANNM //fcff'C-; '1.! :\lf'. t. cf . U 'n^r. : I !^ .r‘*bv o*=.rtl‘’y tiniit u.li: ii Ir^ .^j.u ' .ru't vw^ i».i e U wl i ^ SrEhTM-T- A».o‘ • W . , nr e I* e lot utl .1 o‘* uii %r.;ire*j.j. l Zl aoc ia ;.i»l p»\ir;:or 1 ^c• i.;\; • p. ♦ ^.''t• A 4 ^4 • « ^/.t:-J ^ . a «• t. , W:Cci. :1 ft -^ ^ *•9•• ’ •* Zf 1 J 1 -L -V7 - •. ihsX Zl\.::r,r 0 :3rr?. ::i.r>- r ^-n, ^, : .ii.z.r^c\i. d_ ?sr» i 7 . 4 ♦ 4 V TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Conaission and Council Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator July 2, 1980 SUBJECT: #555 Cortlen Cloutier, 2480 Casco Point Road Conditional Use Permit and Variance Staff Update Planning Coonlsslon asked for an interpretation of the following section of the code 31.110 - as to determining what structure on a given property Is defined as non conforming use/structure. In addition does this ordinance also make a distinction between a non conforming structure and a non conforming use. 31.110. Apply to''U8es" Only. The non-conforming use provisions of the Zoning Code apply only to the use to which land and buildings are put, and do not apply to situations where location or height of structures, lot size or other factors not Involving the use of the premises prevent strict conformance with the requirements of the Zoning Code. Where, however, such a situation existed legally under the prior applicable lav, the Council will not unreasonably require strict compliance and will generally look with favor on granting of a variance under 32.300ff. It is this section that gives Council broader discretionary power In dealing with existing principle structures located within setback areas, on substandard lots, etc. The City does not recognize these principle structures as non conforming uses/structures. A boat house with similar ^setback problems although seemingly a compatible residential use becomes a non conforming use/structure by it accessory c^sslflcatlon. Council's policy on lakeshore accessory structures Is a fair and reasonable use of Its "police power". The City controls encrouchlng principle structures by setback, area, width and hardcore standards, never by designating them nonconforming uses—the City would have to rent Court space. As to the distinction between structure and use - there Is none. An •accessory structure becomes a non conforming use/structure because It docs not meet the standards of the district. The non conforming structure althou^ a permitted, compatible residential use, such as a boat house,lakeshore cabin (accessory to principle structure such as Seifert Case) Is considered a non conforming use. 1980 Update of Cloutier File a) Scheller letter dated June 25, Review of facts 1- Construction begun without permit Scope of original permit - boat house at ground Fee based on following: a-Cost of Material b-Work done by owner c-Ground level boat house (30* x 20'), capped off with a deck. 2- 3- K' • Jaiinne Zoning idnlnlstrator of City of Orono. fti or about May 3^19^ I was notified of construction being done on the property of Cortlen ^outier of 2h80 Casco Point Rd« No perait had been issued by the inspector at this time* When I arrived at the scene* the blodc^fork had alreqdy collapsed due to Hilly early back fill, rain the night before and non oonforming (8) eight inch blocks* When I talked to Cloutier about the coUaj-sed structure and failure to get a building perait* he stated to me that it was a y ground level boathouse* and that the material cost would not exceeed $500*00( ^ive hundred Dollars). I went to several of the neighbors* among them Wilbur and Kaurine ^‘ndersen at 3555 fVederick St* and they said they would have no objection to a ground level boat house* With this I issued a pvnoit # 2495 for $500.00 ( Five hundred Dollars) In materials at a fee of |5*00( five dollars)* When the concrete BLook work was finished* eos^rising ofl2 inch Elock* and the boat house was capped off, I cheeked it out and assumed that it was coaqjlete as per our agre inent with Kr. tSLoutier* the rate of fee for permit paid^and the negotiation I had with the Neighbors Former ^Uilding Inspector Notarized! June 25. 1980 cMaurine e/foJexien NOlAal . .li * MiAeflSOfA COUNlf My cowwiimon 4. 1914 ■I ‘^^NoUryi A. June 24, i960 Jeenne Kabusth Zonln£ Conan* Adn* Orono City Hall Crystal Bay, Hi.55331 The Qrcno Building inspeeter, Mike Scheller, stopped at our home abotth May 1, 1971* He informed us of a boat house going up on the Cloutier property at about 2480 Casco. pt.Rd* He stated that it mss to be of cement block construction and to be widerground and capped off with a deck. He asked if we wouldhare any objection to a structure such as this* Both Maurine and I questioned him about the former attempt at this construction, not having blocks up to code and the failure to obtain a permit. Mr. Scheller stated that the new construction would be brought to code and that a permit could be Issued if there was not any neighborhood objection* We agreed to allow the constructlan as stated above and within the limits and validity of the permit whitdi was to be issued for five hundred dollars* When the oement blocks were capped off at ground level and tho deck (and/or roof)boards were nailed down, sy understanding was that it was complete as per agreement with Mr. Scheller and within the full limits of the permit. Wayzata, Hi. 55391 i