HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-05-1980 Planning Packetagenda
r PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MONDAY, MAY 5, 1980
COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
1. Call to Order/Roll
PUBLIC HEARING
7:30 P.M. #545 Bruce Hepp, 2605 West Lafayette Road
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
ACTION ITEMS
3. #548 Milton Seifert, 1856 Shadywood Road - VARIANCE
4. 1464 Kern Hoppe, 950 Sixth Avenue North - FINAL SUBDIVISION (Resolution)
5. #538 William Moore, 4701 West Branch Road - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
6. #542 Don Udell, 1210 Loma Linda Avenue - VARIANCE
7. #554 Duane Hall, 1860 Shadywood Road - VARIANCE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
8. Meeting of April 21, 1980
ft
INFORMATION ITEMS
9. Public Hearing has been scheduled for May 19, 1980 at 7:30 P.M.
to review Comprehensive Plan.
0>Ano Pi ^ CorK ryvi^s^-'a/V fr^'^Ja.^
City of Orono, Minnesota
ObMt Numbering bidaK Map
-J
Pi
V . . . 1.-. •
®no in « mt^SsS lyiaA^S'j ff^O i
City of Orono, Minnesota
^TMt Numbering hidex Map'
Nor«t
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission and Council
Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
April 30, 1980
#545 Bruce Hepp, 2605 West Lafayette Road
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
Public Hearing - May 5, 1980
«
After reviewing the survey submitted to staff at our last meeting and
the previous discussion of riparian rights for the newly created lot,
staff will require a formal preliminary plat designating all structures,
access easements (widths should be designated), a proposed house location
meeting all setbacks of the zoning district and the area of each lot.
The Planning Commission should decide if the access easements (or just the
one serving the Hannah house) should be subtracted from lot area. What
should the City's position be in the matter of three lots being served by
40 lineal feet of public road assigned to a single residential lot.
Planning Commission should be advised as to history of the access drive
serving the Hannah house. A vertical subdivision is out of the question.
The City cannot encourage the obvious gerrymandering of lot lines to
create riparian lots. Planning Commission questioned whether a riparian
outlet could be created as in a recently approved plat based on the
approximate 300 lineal feet of lakeshore. In the referenced plat, the
developer could have created riparian lots without gerrymandering lot
lines; this does not hold true in this case.
Please review the enclosed survey designating the required lakeshore
setback from the lagoon and the access easements along south side of
property and the location of the driveway serving applicant's house.
Staff recommends tabling the application pending receipt of a preliminary
subdivision designating the following:
1. all structures and setbacks
2. access easements (noting width for each)
3. proposed house site meeting all required setbacks
4. area of each lot (Planning Commission to decide what should be
subtracted from overall area)
IT
!il
; 1
if
rV».
f?
I
i-
• # »\tpb
Trr T’lpn r. .••c;on
in 5.n1j: f' nn'? Iv'', o':ovr ’alia
MtT.ncoin n''mty, 1-innoaoV;
#54
I
J
.Surveyor'3 S*' ' ^r.cr.t ;
I hor'.by c.0T'.'‘fy bbat
if. 3 lru._* n;H* .?rr-
ruvt 3?:-'s‘c}'.
cir.i p-.-rl r.f Lrt ,
S;-r.rc fer t: e \ji
to It puruicf o*' l.rc';t-
ir.i; the iiulc3nt,6 and
rhoroljr*.
\
nor(’..-n '.. Crr •'/•#■. 6064
h«.rd Sui'vr.vor and t’Ltnner
Lenp L«iko, I'inneacla
J
4
J
r
LimMLomberComiuuiy
9
iT-iifiigefE
^ <
i]
300 MORSE AVENUE • MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. BOX 40 • EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 553aCJDD^TEQ6«ofi^QWft.6991
THOMAS P. LOWE
PraMkm
April 28. 1980
Ms. Jean Mabusth
Zoning Administrator
City of Orono
1335 Brown Road S.
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323
Dear Ms. Mabusth:
RE: BRUCE HEPP SUBDIVISION
Lots 9 & 10, Shore H1i^5
Enclosed Is a copy of petition we intend *o present at the
Planning Convnission meeting on May 5 reg Jing the Bruce Hepp
subdivision. A majority of the property jlders on Lafayette
Road are against this application. I am inclosing this material
now so that you will have this in advd..Cc of the meeting.
Sincerely,
)
'■ Vv
Thomas P. Lowe
4 - -f ♦
TPL:dm
enc.
Lyman Lumber Company
^ Hie professional bnUtf^
W supply confer
300 MORSE AVENUE • MAILING ADDRESS; P. O. BOX 40 • EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 • TELEPHONE 612-474 5991
■ *
Si
I,
THOMAS P. LOWE
President
R. L. DePAUW
Vice Preiideni
April 28, 1980
**■0: The City of Orono Planning Commission ana Council
RE: BRUCE HEPP PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 9 & 10
SHORE HILLS
The undersigned are opposed to the proposed subdivision of Lots 9 and 10
for the following reasons:
1.Lot 9 has 40' of frontage on Lafayette Road. If this proposed sub
division were allowed it would mean that three single family
residences would be using driveways fronting on a 40' lot.
2.I understand that Mr. Hepp's proposal calls for the inclusion of
lakeshore which would mean that we would have a seriously gerrymandered
lot line to allow lakeshore to be attached to the proposed subdivision.
3.Almost all of the lots in Shore Hills, at one time or another, had or
have now, a deed restriction providing that only one single family
dwelling be built on a lot. It is obvious that the intent of the
developer and the buyers of those lots were, that the area would remain
devoted to large lots with only one house per lot.
4.The Hepp property has only one sewer and water assessment. If the intent
of the Council were to allow higher density in this area, it would have
provided sewer and water at an earlier date for more connections.
5.Lafayette Bay is an environmentally sensitive bay and additional
population pressure would only add to this problem.
6.If this subdivision were granted it would set a precedent for sub
division on other lots in the area. There are presently two or three
lots on Lafayette Road which could be subdivided into additional lots.
If the Council were to allow this subdivision we would then want the
Council to go on record that it would allow additional lot subdivision
in the area along the same lines granted to Mr. Hepp.
7. We believe that a subdivision of Mr. Hepp's lot would not be in the
best interests of preserving the integrity of the existing neighborhood.
We ask that the Council and Planning Commission deny this application.
Stncerely,
Thomas P. Lowe
TPL:dm
1
-- - - - -- -- —^n-rr ->»#« I.»«rw^<|
RE:BRUCE HEPP PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 9 & 10
SHORE HILLS
Russell Baumgardner, owner of Lot
John Hanna, owner of Lot
Helen Lyman owner of Lots
E. S. Oygert, owner of Lot
William G. Phillips, owner of Lot
Thomas P. Lowe, owner of Lot
, Shore Hills
, Shore Hills
, Shore Hills
, Shore Hills
, Shore Hills
, Shore Hills
I
t
i
i
r"" r
TO:Planning Commission and Council
FROM:Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
DATE: May 1, 1980
SUBJECT: #548 Milton H. Seifert, 1856 Shadywood Road - VARIANCE
Mr, Pearson's comments are factually correct. Staff did not relay
the trouble with the one neighbor on the south side because he
preferred to handle it on his own. The neighbor's privacy fence
sustained damage in two sections. The fence is located on the
property line in such a manner that the damage could only have
resulted with the use of the Seifert driveway. When the neighbor
first attempted to inform Seifert of the damage, Seifert refused to
assume any responsibility. It appears the neighbors have siuc,:Li
reached a mutually beneficial agreement.
I have been advised by the City Attorney that the Planning Commission
had every right to demand removal of the lakeshore rental unit - in
fact, you could have asked for all three to be removed. The fact
that staff did not suggest such conditions in their review of the
variance application does not mean that the Planning Commission is
limited in their review. This is our joint but independent roles.
Staff reports the facts, findings and at times will "suggest" a
recommendation. The Planning Commission is an independent reviewing
body, your dialogue may very well demand a more encompassing
recommendation.
For the record, I think the following questions should be asked:
1. Is Dr. Seifert a full time resident at 1856 Shadywood?
2. Who is responsible for the rental units when he is absent?
3.Since the main house and lakeshore rental unit use the paved area
to be removed for parking and turnaround , how does he plan to
provide a parking area for rental unit and turnaround ability.
Remember a gravel driveway is considered hardcover.
Planning Commission should review application and attorney's comments to
determine if there are additional questions to be asked.
Staff Recommendation - If the variance application is approved, the
applicant must enter into a formal agreement with the City containing
the following conditions:
1. Schedule "Phasing Out" of rental units
a) Lakeshore unit - demolition permit must be obtained one year
from date of signing agreement.
b) Two Shadywood cabins - to be removed no sooner than five years
from date of agreement but removal to be complete seven years
from date of agreement.
CLAVTON L. LirCVtRC
hcrbcht p. LcrtCR
CURTIS A. PCARSON
J. DCNNIS O BRICN
JOHN C. ORAWZ
OAVfO J. RCNHCOV
JOHN B. DEAN
OLENN C. PUROUC
JAMES O. LARSON
CHARLES L. LITEVERE
HERBERT P. LEELtR. m
JEfERET J. STRAND
JAMES P. O'MEARA
MART J. BJORPLUND
THOMAS O. CREIOMTON
WENDY L. FREEDMAN
LAW OFFICES
Lc FEVERE. LEFLER. PEARSON. O' BRIEN & DRAWZ
MOO FIRST NATIONAL BANS BUILOINO
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 5S402
telephone leiai 333-osas
BROOKLYN CENTER OfFlCtS
BIO BROOHDALE TOWERS
tBlQ COUNTY ROAD lO
BROOKLYN CENTER. MINNESOTA 8SA30
IBItl SBI-3EOO
April 29, 1980 niCMAno J. »CMierre«
D iii:II f
il. J Vi
Mr. Alan P. Olson
Business and. Zoning Administrator
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323
ClTTi OE ORONO,
Dear Mr. Olson:
I have recently been retained by and Hra Hilton^H.^Seifer^
1856 Shadywood Road to help them in presenting r _ jt is ^ry
....
^rind^;^eVard^^,”3i8j.,uare teet Of i^i°?our
il^ifvhV
-;:r^er^y\^^e snrtacea and huildi^^
area. With the arcnicecturax . •_ uis rear yard consistingTv>-/-.r.r>c.»c5 to remove a turn-around which is in nis teat yaxw proposes to romo blacktop surfacing and remove three
♦V ^<4^^
i
■TP*
LAW OFFICES
LeFEVERE. LEFLER. PEARSON. OBRIEN & DRAWZ
Mr. Alan P. Olson
Page 2
April 29, 19 80
reducing the hardcover from 41% to 32%. Mr. Freeberg and Dr. Seifert
done everything possible to improve the property and are pro
losing tl house up four feet, utilize the fjj^ting crawl space
and in effect double the s'ze of the living space within the
structure. This iirproveirent will benefit the neighborhood and the
City of Orono by adding major improvements not only in the -
siruc?urrbut in landscaping and improving the aesthetic qualities of
the property.
t is iw understanding that Dr. Seifert and Roger Freeberg believed
ifter ^nsultations with your staff that their proposal would meet
with the favor of your department and with the ^ity fathers. Roger
Freeberg appeared before the Orono Planning Commission and apparently
several co^ssioners raised questions about the proposal and the
mltter was continued to a later "ISlinl'Ma^usth Salunderstanding throuah my conversations with Jeanne Mabusth that
will be on the planning commission agenda for the meeting o M y ,
19 80.
I have m.et with Dr. and Mrs. Seifert and ^eir architect
Freeberg and we have gone over the site in great detail. 9
alno aone to the neighbors and have shown them the plans and discussed
Dr Seifert’s proposed improvem.ents, and the neighbors on each side
hlie SSStld^h?ir apprSval of this “P-^fading o ^e property. I
in Sara sSulture which was built in the City many years
aS il being up-graded to meet the quality of other properties in the
neighborhood and on the lake. I hope that you in
to the planning commission and the planning commissioners will consider
lhat this property was charged four sewer units and four water charges
2“that all of the buildings on the site are connected to the
and water system. The requested variance will result
tTa substantial physical improvement to the site
which will lead toward conformity wxth the goals established in yo
planning and zoning ordinances.
in m.y conversation with your staff P<=«onnel and in other conversations,
I found there were some concerns as it related seirer
I was also told that the neighbors had been promised
"thif tSey'wolirle 1l?ormed prior to the'time the matter was put back
In th“planning commission agenda. We are enclosing herewith ^ state
ment frim the Ibutting property owners on e^tb=ide indicating that
they have reviewed the proposed plan and are in favor of the City
granting the proposed variance because they believe the proposal will
2p-grade t.he Neighborhood and will benefit their property values.
r
I
LAW orriccs
LeFEVERG.LEFLER. PEARSON.O’BRIEN & DRAWZ
Mr. Alan P. Olson
Page 3
April 25, 1980
A statement was made somewhere along the line that some activities on
?hS sitrSorrinconlistent with the neighbor's use of their Property
2 bei^q Thigh quality residential area. I have gone over this in
Si-Tl with Dr Seifert, and he las indicated that outside of his
son making minor repairs on his old car, t^f^®^;;®^Trp?opTty Values.
?he^3Vafalfo^f damaged fence between Dr Seifert's property and^his
neighbor Duane Hall, and an agreement has been made ^*y Dr.
have that fence repaired even though he is not aware a
damage occurred.
p?opTtTlTt'fali,^vifited^SitTpersonneTin your otfice, and obtained
lopierof your orknanles. He believed he was in all
improvements which would be approved by the City
has negotiated financing of his proposed f'^’^°''°j®I’’^his"^hoSin^*'’ *approximately «,000 to date in moving fo«ard^
ih^p^nn^^g-co^m^issLrinTrir? anf the matter »as not approved.
depa?t^rt"anf :e%Ss^;Siru'L" p^otiS:rt^^hr;lanning commi^
?IcIL^nd°W ?hrpCnni;.g clir^i^sipi^and^^rplanning ""
Ldrte positive aspects of the proposal to.the planning commission.
I h’ope that you can view the project in a simalar vein.
CAP:ms
Enclosure
cc: 1*-S- Jeanne Mabusth
Mr. Roger Freeberg
Dr. Milton H. Seifert
i
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Conunission and Council
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
April 30, 1980
#464 Kern Hoppe, 950 Sixth Avenue North - FINAL SUBDIVISION
The applicant has completed ”“®““J„®n||®approval*of''the Hoppe
|°hSrvi‘siSn! w'-vTaTtV, Infect an^d^onditlons cited in the
enclosed resolution.
i
r
►
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF WYNDMERE
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation
organized and existing .under the laws of the State of Minnesota;
of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for
a subdivision plat by Kern M. Hoppe, the subdivider; and
WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the
platting regulations of the City, including:
1. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility ea:?ements.
2. Dedication on the plat of rights of way for public streets
and roads, shown as County Highway No. 6.
3. Creation of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlot
A, to be known henceforth as Wyndmere Road.
Concurrent with the creation of this private
Subdivider has dedicated to the City a Road and Utilities
Easement (Exhibit A) granting to the City pe^anent fccess,
improvement and utility easements over said Outlot; the
Subdivider has created non-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage
and utility easements (Exhibit A) over said O|^tlot in favor
of all abutting and/or benefiting lots; the Subdivider
has created certain maintenance covenants (Exhibit B) wherein
each of the abutting and/or benefiting lot owners covenants
and agrees to permanently maintain and pay the cost of
maintenance for said private road.
4. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation
Easement (Exhibit C) providing for ^^“^tations on the
use of wetlands and/or drainageways described therein.
5. Execution of a Subdivider's Agreement (Exhibit D) providing
for installation of certain improvements as a condition ot
subdivision approval.
i
•)
f
6, Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the
eunount of $800.00.
7. Payment to the City for engineering and legal fees
in the amount of $350.00.
8. Payment to the City of $150.00 for cost and installation
of two road signs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Wyndmere, Hennepin County,
Minnesota; subject to the following condition;
The aforesaid plat shall be filed with the Hennepin County
Recorder's Office on or before November 12, 1980 together
with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed
copies of Exhibits A, B, C, and D as noted above.
The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat
has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will
be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for
sxibdivision review.
Dated this day of , 1980.
WxTlieun B. Van Nest, Mayor
ATTEST:
Walter R. Benson, City Administrator
i
TO:Planning Connnission and Council
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
DATE:April 30, 1980
SUBJECT: #538 William Moore, 4701 West Branch Road - SUBDIVISION
The Moores have decided to proceed with their original application of
a two'lot plat. The application is returned for a recommendation of
preliminary approval by the Planning Commission. The On-Site Manager
has approved the septic testing; Lot 2 will support a standard system
and both lots have suitable drainfield area for future alternate systems.
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat of William Moore based
on the following conditions:
1. Flowage and Conservation Easement taken over the wetlands.
2.Variance for animal barn of 80' from Lot 2 property line - hardships:
1) location of existing fencing along east/west property line and
2) animal barn was located 130* from existing east property line.
3.Dedication of right-of-way for West Branch Road of 40' and Dedication
of right-of-way for Kighview Lane of approximately 30' (not designated
on preliminary plan).
4. Park dedication fee for Lot 2 of $100.00.
r
I
5t.
I
LAND USE PLANNING
ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION
EXHIBIT 1
CITY OF ORONO
F.O. Bos 6B, Crjitsl Bay, Mlnncaof 5S323 473-7357
#ES42
hitSTBUCTIONS: FImb* firat read tha accaebcd Inforaaclon Sheet* Cowplete ltc«i 1-13
* I _^ mm i II f II iMar 1 nji h*rr«1(T>p« or frlnt). It needed, attach letter or other Infomatlon to better
deaeribe your requeat. Ineooplete applicatlona will not be accepted.
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Peacrlotioo
PROPERTY ADDRESS /9^iO
Legal daacrlptioa ahall be attotm on attached Survey. Exhibit 3
Initial Application
asist include:
\\
APPLICANT , /7r a/ / / Hf Ll . rhone ^7/-.A'
/Jjyc ^C'JM L /‘hotUk'DMiilini Addreaa
If Applicant ia not enmer, explain
^ Application Tom
Property Ounera List
j/ Certificate of Sure<
*^^ree Receipt
OWNER Na.e C\(..yllnfL / Thone
Date Secelved A
.y\^LAt
Malllns Addreee -------------------—----------------------j*
• Date Property Acquired y//|^—
X (do) (“firTiW)- also own otner adjac
_ (»tonth/Year)
adjacent parcels of land
Fhone ______ , _____________
Staff Information
4 ^ flat Map
5 ^ Inventory
6 Staff Coonenta
Other Information
a __
Mailing Addreae
5 . NOTICES Should be aent to:Oirner
6 ,vy(^ PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT _
7 .'/. PRESENT USE sotiS"**-! ^^^/cother) _
■ Vacant Und_ _ _ Vacant Buliaing(e)
Applicant \/
lr - le
Agent
Occupied Building(a)
8.DESCRIBE REQUEST /
^ eatabliah new uae ^^eoi
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION TOST $ OOCION TOST
continue or expand oxlatlng uae __build neu arfd on ___re«>d«l ___replace
Describe request in detail:^dtL,vf^
9.y^VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED to do the re.ue.ted WoA:
^^^tbach {_ _Front
Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover
Side Rear) Other
10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS pr.v-.tin. coi^iunc. with io«i-« ^ r.,uir.-.nt.:
n ---■jtC' h---
Describe'undue HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY re.uitmg
11. ‘ 0 . L / •
It of aoolog
regulationa AO jL
^ ------- — ----- -------- ^ ^ V
j i m r
12. Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK on neighboring propertlea the neighborhood ia g<
The APPLICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER must sign and date this application.
Ihe AfPLICANT hereby agreee to provide oil Infernetlen ibe CMmS hereby ackncwledgns ^ *?, ^ craurtT
required or requeated by tho loning Adddniatretor, egreea mn4 further euthoriaea roaaonable entry mto tne property;; K.-" i'n:.;s;“-rr^iiurj:; snuun.rts-
supplied ia true end correct to the beat of hia knowledge: verification of this roqitaat:
Applicant's Signature Date
P//a'
Owner's Signature Date
EXHIBIT 1
^542
If-
ou./k'/}
if land ‘ -5^
LIST OF EXHIBITS
# PggeriptiBM
Inlttal Applicption
■uat include: j|
1 ApplicatUm For*
2 Property CWnere List
3 j/ Ccrtlficata of Surv(
JlJ^^Fee Receipt
Dete Received ^ **^y*~v/*A
• Ry^^itf
Steff Infomuitioa
4 ^ Piet Mep
5 ^ Inventory
6 Staff Cbanente
Other Inforg»tloti
7 i/^ vyuLV^u^V
8 ffjs lors
UCTION CpST $ (?C7C^
reeiodel ^ repleee
q TOST
on _
Lot Width Herdcover
■nee with Zonins Code requlreoents:
^jc A^h A) (U c^><4-L
reeultlag fron strict enforeeaent of soolpg
njt?AL,_____________________
ee end on the neighborhood in generel:
date this application.
^ ecknooledgoo end ogreee to this ofpllcotl
othorleoe roeeoMble entry onto the pfwperty
ooneultento, ngontSt coenleeion ne^ere,
li------for pmyesee of inveetlgotlon end
of this rofoeet:
Signature Date
. HC K33 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
A-60S OOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487
LIST Size \Q>‘
i CERTIFY THAT TH
CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE
SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS
DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY
FINANCE DIVISION. TO TNE DEST OF MY KNOWLEOCE
AND SEUEF.
NENNEPIN CO. FINANCE DIVISION J
DATE
FEE OWNER I ^AX PAYER /
MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS ID
k.'? T'llY X-2B
Qa-14-
T-A* A)U/vz- . 1 3100. |St-4A/c> Vieuj cK.
l50WAt,l> R_ VlfcMfP CW^ tJ^3|,4
1 da-At
^ /*/4
D0/ViA4.O l/DeLf. ^/v\a L/NtiA 5^34r4 ■X S'
RD«6K.T J. lU\6>NeK. Of'Uzc^ U)M/\ C/A/D-'k SS34-?
■ - ■ ' r 4
zMiL a’HlE'i 01^ \2Z< L0MA UNo/>t 7
k-e T'/n 10-Z5
I "qq-z^
f.C. SCHUC.HAV4/V/»/ Ol^ LmA UA/bA^ AVIS'
"
2
^ i-Y/VyV p)6 \l\^0 Lo/v\A UNO A
rivwuA/o iM/e
iC/VAc-b Xi L/PGU. p|L> l7»8a c^A\A LhV/3A /h/tr n Ia
06-
•I I n \7.00 LoA\A- U n OA' ^' 3
^HALO i CAK. Ubi^LL- »«___ •>' i
0. IUVAtT Mo€ ^ MfiL.5 . , .IZZO COMA UA/oA S"
1230 SFiLocir pc
tOA/ALb J JiXJNN I2‘=J0- SFliuce' "Pt-7
(XL-Z-h
jDftttT A VAA/TASSfeL^Un zt t:. <:6V6A;TfLy jzo mo-C oma i-hvoA .Ai/t /S-
^ soajeer
1 1 'Pe<??6tTy J
i
---------------- ------f---------
'i
1 •
1 a
» 1
1
» 1
'
^ r.„ 1 ^ •I* I
£Ut,£,T- 3
1ST t;
FHAT THE FACTS REPIIESENTCO ON THIS
ARE AH ACCURATE AND TRUE RERRE-
OF INFORMATION AS IT ARREARS THIS
t RECORDS OF THE HENNERIN COUNTY
fISION. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEOOE
DATE
PROPERTY ADDRESS ID
5(2 '/4
yf
S’
6 1
23
z
A//a i
06-53
C.IA/OA 3
____________Y 1
IZZO (^OMA C/A/oA S"
12 30 S^lLUCCi P<-
7
CJJ-Z5 1
'1
^/,VO>4 /b'
1
^ so&j&r
'PEdpeeTy
“ /-------------------
I I
I ft ^ 4T
structures
CCSSrUM •U2L02JICS
riutraAL TtwKt
if'J.
4
•UmM* MIMN NYAYN •* «MMR«fH
****»*^- ONRtWA«*N NR orr MR *lp*ARNAMI
lA*t
<9."1
— ^7
• ‘ f • 4. • VI \ I •,. • •
. -*•
• i
w' I
• ♦ •*
1* ^ ■»
r*
i .•
*fV .►v-.,
fejl'.N 4 >• jI'" '
■ 'I ^ 1
!
r*. — -*
•»:
■ '-,!■ •’a
//.
1.
, ? Z s 5J • «« aW •^2 5^ 9 6. ». •«
R»«r»i I
c SYHorl
A Bratt
I iWntfricI
iDts at P.K»
9'^ filBta
^So not cooply «lO> tonlnp p.»lor»«nc« atandtrAa
•ntlraly ITO* bulldlny or »••
^ ’ roviao •• ■*** building or Icoat orcaada SO* rKVJ
“iT^raalaa at OPAHSION of axiating Icoat laaa than SO* FIW>
Bailing baUdlng rXlR MfcKKTT VMLOE |yr| --------- »------------
%fi^XX %dT i»iAl itot r«duc« mttFKOMAL
yard dlja«n*i€»
TAXES & ASSESSMENTS
MOrcm XDa_________
U»t«/farc«ia ^mad In
XAXJtSi __ currant .
Aaaa»aMnia l^avladi
____ Sawar Cno|
ara IT ara iiot lE»9aiiy
ara DClaXMOOOrT ta yaar ,
linad lor Can ?4|tpoaao
unita Valar (no)unita
: 4/T- 3
V • *•• *' •<' • :'. ■ •... 0 •• • ■ • »»«•»*■;
-i } - ' V' . /*.. ■. •'.; . » •
:. JAOK80N . • ^
lamo •umriTM
%AW 99 «?*Tt 90
umtm 99 or? 99
» ^
7f? ' «1
•
• %
!?
its J ' '
s?si; -
25?*S«X^ Bfi»t
c9t«**fi|p •WnBrlcl
I
!•!# •! I*.K.
ai- tiitff*
rAa
tsieai
}
5,4i2§
'(■
«Wo
t-f 9
/i
tAL-
'__r
SI3S£Mi:i
« _____________t •
. • 1 ■ n
••••■^
li vl*iiiw 1)
» t
• ^
f f)*.’l^g
m •
•dM
mLt II
1 k Ut
r
r •
/
L.« aj
SkAXi
I
structures
ISXSrUiG BUILD1X9CS
X>cfici«nci«Bx
FBOrOSJO. TTFCi
l/^do not cooply «it>i »oni«g p«rforMnc« .itna.rd.
•ntiraly HW buildin9 or «»•
r«vi«v •• inv bulldin9 or o*e fco*t •jrc8«d* 5D» FKV)
i/* ___________ . < _____«_______________
FWOMAL
:: o.« .«rn^,
Bsiatlng building FAIR MARWT VALUE tyr) ---------- »------------------
t>r will not roduco an uiating aubatandard yard dlnanalon
TAXES & ASSESSMENTS
MOFumr XD.
€09nmd in coonon ^
XAXLS* __ •*'• »AID ctircBAi
•rm _____ not Im^mlly conbinoa fo*- t»* pur!»••••
nro DEXaXNOUrKT to ymmr _________
AA»««Mnt« loviodi
S«v«r fiM>)tinilB WAt«r Cnol units
>i %>
ht (m
s
±JLf
CITY OF ORONO
LAND USE PLANNING
ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY
exhibit 5
vtartances required
density HiNiguHjfiyyiisa
Zoning Use District ^
CODE StCTlg!
VAPIXNCT
cft BACKS P-.IKIKUK REOUIRO)rvi«;TlMC ------- i
StraCt |f»0'*t)a
SiSa A
%\tm __________
3aar
B)89. to llSg.
75 Ft.
XuaVaahors
35 Ft._
V‘cll»n4a
•PER.*OTTED
hardcover .
tor XRJEA
_£5X. Cil:--------—
liXIlDCOVIlR
a.l.______i
wa 0 " 75
pMOFOSgtt
VXR7 KNCE
r*nQE SECTID?
DC1S“’»-
HAWX-. ‘Vf
*•!=----------
'/POPOSED
hardcover
s
TOTM.
VXRIAHCE
It ----------
sect ;
31.831
O - 75 rt.
L>k« 75 - aso
U^m 750 - 500 Ft.. 3«
UA. 500 - *000 rt. 3W
>4.302
34.303
34.303
34.303
OTHER SECTIONS arjontg.
•ulioiny t««.)--------------
rmc SECTiat
4 lov^p.'c.l. per^pUc.tlon
vacant }/^. occuplaO •
lAWD
Vr.-----7 .;n; 7'’,*;!:!
*';V7s'“o-ner.hlp ____ -Ingl, ..pT.te
January ____^tianO. _____ M,b orounO
•••••
ajmc o^i^ncraytip acparat* own«r»>»lP
loe^^/vtth cthir’ pV'rc.l. not In thl. appUctlon
Javal 9roun0 rolllnp blXla
__ - , uno.ual lot ahap* _ _ _ unuaual toondln, location
CEOCMnfy alfactln9 appiyationt i„conalatant with nal9>>bor»>«>d Oevalopaent
lot “"j;, JZ <i*» ------- county/.t.t.
access 1
UTJIolTlESt city aa«a* ____ available connactod: City water
prival*
■vallal>3a____connttct^O
Tl**i «ty av—. -----• ' oooaad ‘aalalln9 conlomi^ ____ axlatln9 aubatandard ------. a»latlf>9 "*>
aaptic ayata. -------P»®»” ------"
TAND USE
Si^jaet lot ia vacant
OISTIMC IMO} WSt ctawrad to a~l"9 *••»
raOPOSAl. allacta _W!^; principal _
occ-upi*^
e aiatxicts _ __ conforming uaa
•cceaaory "buliain^ or mmm
conaltlonal waa non-oonfonlno waa
structures
...V,.. ..o. -------------------------
D«f Iclanciaa* ----------------------—
paoPOSAb «K. — «>*
PPOPOSAL
• niXrVAX --------------------
r«vi«v aa ww buliaif*g or «aa fcoat aacaa^a S0« FKVI
‘TT^ravlaa aa DCPAHSIOM of a*iatin9 fcoat laaa than 50% FKV)
E.latln9 baUdir.9 FAIR HAIWtT VAUIi: (yr) --------- »------------—
^7][7" Jr ^lU M>t rodoe. an ulstin9 autoatandard yard dia.naioii
TAXES & ASSESSMENTS
paopEimr XD. „ ----------—
l^ts/parcala oamaO In co«aon
XAJUUs ____ currant
jUaaaaoanta baviaai
_____ Savar Cnol
»Fo orm_____ not iaoally cooblnod for ta* parpoaaa
ara OELThgOEWT to yaar ___________
units Watar Cnol units
■ rt f\.i rvi 1 d t vvr I r^Kl KfVirTTVn:^;
CITY OF ORONO ‘EXHIBIT 6
Page 1
EXHIBIT 5
Use District ^
coot SLOJOS
TSUR
nx>JCl
root SCCTlg
OS CD
COVIIA
TOnM-
VJUlXAUCt
% ■ -r * ■
^ CODE StCTlI
31. Ml '
34.303
34.303
34.303
34.303
VXKIWCC
COPCSECTICII
Ion
icp*r»tn own«r«>»ip
other pere.l. not In thl. .ppUc.tlon
ground Foiling tillln
j location
elopnicnt
connnciod
.ob.t.nSiTa _____ ..l.tln9 non-conlor»lm
mb\m
conditional «»•non•csonfoDBlng %•••
pargoaon
LAND USE PLANNING*
STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS
PREPARED FOR:
BY:
Pl.fming Ct>™«leelon Mectinq «D»te|
Council Hucting Cl>4l«)---------------—
ISt.fO ____________ P
Utelf ) *____________
LJJ^
APPLICATION REVIEWED BY:
City Administrator
• •
City Attorney
City Enginaor
^llaga ?lannar
Zoning Adiaini at rater
Planning Conwiaaion
Park Goimiaaion
Public Works Coordinator
Public Safety Director
Finance Director
Building inspector
Septic Inspector
Hennepin Cty. DOT
Minn. Stats DOT
Minn. DNR
MCWD
LMCD
SPECIAL COMMENTS
/if r-/—i*f***-t ^
^ L-c^T^ ZT -
tra ^iJ •
7 ^
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
approve application aa subiaittod
APPROVE application aub^sct to folloa^log conditions
______ TABUr ai^licatioti lor additional information
_____ DDfY applicRlioR lor rsaaons noted tabovs
••
♦. ;•
!.?:FnWF PTANNTNr: rnT-^-rr<:«:Tnw r.frrTTvr
aCHlBIT 6
*age 1
Hennepin Cty, DOT
Minn. Stele DOT
Minn. DHS
HCWD
LHCX>
iu.
HH ^eryeiJSPu
CITY OF ORONO
LAND USE PLANNING
STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS
exhibit 6
Page 2
SUGGESTED FINDINGS
lm>eai*t«ly Borrounainfl P^®****^ ]L
In *a»lch ••la »«na 1* locn • s n=coU»r to •*»ch ptopcrty orr»r.x::.:ss;:3 —.r^rr*■ -• *■
^ U» -- - - -- “* *
.rpucn..
». .. o..'«■ - ■”■“
■ «>»!• or V ^,1,. h, 'O, ..fety, coofort. «>r.i. or
^ —rlnocn My »*>• P^li® V** ••»*'»•. 9r.ntln, ol th. propo..a v.rr.oc. ~y p-
9enerel %#elfere. - - --i—-i«-
4*
me 9renx^xn^ w* — -
9«ncral w«lfnr«. intnnt of t>»« ConprnhenrJvo Iona U*«
9«ntin9 of t>.,^o.»M- v.ri.nc. .iU «ot t- contr.ry
Plan or tl*« *onin9 Ooaej *»* - - - -l)a«
91*a 9ranixnp -
■ Plan or tl« *o"»"9 “**•» ®" coiaprahanaiv. Lana Uaa
a o.rlanca wouia ba contrary to tha Intant or «•
*.a 9r«ntln9 of tha propo..a varlanca «o
* Plen or the Zoning Code. _ _is neces
5.to allaviata danonatrataa haraahipa - - --- - -
m, «_ _ _
_ _ __ Ihe granting.of eucn w«rdshloe or difficulties; OR
SUGGESTED
..............................
A ju
* <1
jc^/q a.
..PAm INK TKN nn\ nAvq wFFni<F PTANNTNn rof^iT<;«;TrtKt T.frrTTvr
•* •
••••■1 ,4
* . \ . ^ r;- «n.u..., :
?;’■ <tv >--■■>■-•''•?'jlTr^ - ' ■ t;... H5,' - ■•^'/ . V'.'
r‘:. •■ •...« .• o* ',• \
/• V 'r
I
I
h • t \ V';
Ir-Hi ?■;■''
tr •••#
%< J
___I____
----—N--------------
• t'----j: ,f]i
j \ ^ . * h
iKi- f- ~
i* \
\
\
1. •
■'•••< -Wr* »,,., ^1,,, ^ -
............. ‘•"■int..,. |,|«^.’ ■
I
#
iJfr Ir'.*’.*.” ■’ •' ~ '•«• ^«••«•!I!••
. ’.•»•■
*- ^ . t '•r-
B/fUd i L
r^l.w
JL
#554
LIST OF EXHIBIT!IHSTKUCriOltS; firat raid thm Attached Infomatlon Sheet. Ccmplete lte«a 1-13
(Type or Print). If needed, attach letter or other InfonMtlon to better
deacribe your requeat. Inconplete appllcatlona will not be accepted.
PROPERTY ADDRESS (St-6 (5(t D
Legal deacrlptlon ahall be ahoim on attached Survey, Exhibit 3
APPLICANT .u.. D M a A y-7 / - V c' -7 c|
Hailing Addreaa / <•> Cum VI
Initial Applicatioi|
nuat Include:
Applicant ka not owner, explain
Application Fora
Property Ounera Lti
___ Certificate of Sur>
Tmm iLicclpc # fd^
Dat(v Received
3. OWNER n>Ars/^< Fhon. ^ yV O
Mailing Addreaa /___________________________________
Date Prop^PtykAcquired i^O C y ^ (Honch/Ycr)
I (do) not) also own other adjacent parcels of land
4.AGENT
rii
Fhone Other Inforaation
Mailing Addreaa
5.
6.
7.
NOTICES Should be aent to:/Applicant Owner A^cnt
PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT /- R - lo
7
8
9
10
11
12
PRESENT USE 8aaidentinl (Other)
Vacant Land Vacant 8uildlng(a)Occupied lullding(a)
8.OODESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ •
__ MUbUah BM ua« — eoBtinu* or rapand alaclBS uaa __kulld bm ___add m ___ raa>dal __rapUc
Describe request in detail: ______________________________________________________
Al cc Lc^co r c T^cc P£.a A_ o p/. /u e
9.
fcL\i.'i>h7icCi ic ‘ iT'i Q.0 /ff
VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED to do ch« ra^u.atad Wort.: toe ^itordL^i?'
Setback (____rnmt _____Side ______Rear) Othtar________________________________________________
10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS prcveatlB, coaq>UaBea wUh zoning Coda ra^ulraMBts:
pui ig- «-Ot t-ui-0 'Hec^Li.iCe^ LLLrrr<upuUt^ai^a^_____
/UAP/Le^ n/<Jn ____________________________________
Describe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY r.auitiog fro. .trice .f
regulationa 6^ '
jeJe-A i €t\A2. y . Luiff^ i</u <- y / /4-t^
12. Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK oo Bclgbborln, prop>>rttca a»d m the Bclghborhoed la ^«aiaral- ^
Oo
The APPLICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER must sign and date this application.
^ RdalBlaeratar, agrcaa tether aacharl.aa raaatatabl. antry one. eba praparty
*• S*y •« *—• •Bd/or lamaual Mpmaaa Ineunrad 1b rmlaw p, city ataff cwauleanca aaenta eoMlaaloii --- -
auppltad la tnia and corrace co eha bast of his knowledge: warlflcatloo .f chla rMswestT
A
Is^ienatAire Datie
C^AXllOXX JL
, #554
LIST OF EXHIBITI
Pgtcrtptloa
Initial Application
■uat include:
y Application Torn
fropartp Ouncra Lii
Certificate of Sui
Fee ILscelpt # 22l
Dace. Received
»y >K.
Hat Hap
tar)
.s of land
z
A^wnt
!(•)
oO
ITRDCTION COST $ /^Ad *
m fc*iild new add on raaodel replace
0 p/ /vc e
?4£A\etv4'p ^ .::>rPdrx’
Lhcr
pIlaBce vltli Zoning Code reguircaenti:
^ result log Iron strict cnfor<kt of aonl^
^ • U^itU ^ '/lao CiniC
ZyWCTVfT
••t*hh«rt>o«4 «a t«n«ratt
1 date this application.
■ end egreea to tlita epplteett^
iaoe rekaaeeaMe entry onto tKe prepart|
eel tent a, egenta« ceeeiieaton auHibera,
ter purpoeea ef inveatigetion and
• ef tkia request:
ff.
w
HC 1233 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST - ORONQ^i\
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS,
i
LIST SIZf
1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ON THIS
CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE
SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS
ITE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY
ilHANCE DIVISION. TO THE REST OF MY ANOWLEOOE
■EUEF
INEPIH CO. FINAHCS/OIVI9I9** ^/Z
DATE 32®..,
FEE OWNER
V 1) (4) W
/2j2MLA±£diJilC
Z.E..SIMM0L
JlA ! P / /l,M ~i
V t f
c
\Jc^ "TILl~0l So,
TAX PAYER/
MAILING ADDRESS
7?^m •• 0
PROPERTY ADDRESS
//p
/
/7-//7-Z^ -2JJ-
//
6
/^ 57^/^
//
(t ////
/ Jt
k\
■mi=
A//TT ^ ('J£N
//u
1*-
//
Plat of SurvDy
Hennepin County* .ilnneso
■’■. ’O
Certificate of fi^ey* • ^ correct *
I hereby certify that ”_7 erbent the »»orth 15 feet, sa“ feet
survey of the boundaries °^-^^-^®*S®^«orth line of saW lot, and Lot 28,
beine -neasured at right angles frOT -in bulldingSe thereon,
?li in aaayvooa, .nd of Vo^o^
urd all visible ^Jigage loan now being placed on th«ii nafle only in connection with a morig g holder of such mortgage
prc^rtyi ."na no ”=T,Lro? o^oh ~rW. K 1» .
or any other interest ^ placed for the purpose of establishstood and agreed no monuments have been placed lo
ing lot lines or boundary corners.
Wr»rsT Kelley, Jr.
Bruce P. Kelley
Cordon K. Coffin
Scalet 1" = 50'
Date J C-2l-o3
vjg. No.
Beg. Ho.. 5713
Beg. Ho. 60o4
KEIIF.Y & KELIfnr, Engineers & Surveyors
Long Lake, Minnesota
"L*. '
STRUCTURES
01STXW Bviiosnes
# . - Mrformanc*y ^ ^ do not co-ply «it>. -oning P«rt _ _ _ _ _ __
/ jj[ir__•!»» •*» *" __________—
TAXES A
NKteun »»
assessments
)^554
sentatlon of a
et, said 15 feat
A lot, and Lot 2a,
Lf anT, thox^on,
»nd. 'This survey
j placed on the
»r of such mortgage
B, It is under-
mrpose of eatahllsh**
So. 1342
Reg. So. 57U
Reg. So. 6064
Engineers & Surveyors
E>ta
, "
wm
omrtormmncm
40 not ct»P»y ________________
taxes a
!l■liy ■n-hl—d «or fcw»
t.
w
I f 4.' *. ■ f
‘:
=f^i
■*i
-A
CITY OF ORONO
exhibit 5
UND USE pntorYZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY
^ptances requ i^
>ENSITY HiHiKujLJsmiiS
cool_s££IlSB
VAPlKXCt^
7^
jETBAOiS viKiKUH wtQjj?.S3 BUSH—^
pBnPOSP^
y^lWiS.------ — T'
^rmc StCTIQi
re
75 Ft.*
75 rt^
UOT XWEA
fjAPDCOVER jiaxo
0 -
O)^
ink. 0 - «
08
Lk. 75- aj®'*-758
L.fc. *50 - »®®308
L*J|. 500 - »ooo rt.35%
PEF“JTTI2>
iixiu>covi»
9^^-----
dcistxkc
lysJUXION^
iJb:--------
PPOPOSX3>
MXW)CC3VtA
«.f. ----
totm.
VXIOAHCE
Jt ».,l8---------
^rmg SCCTIg
31.831
34.702
34.703
34.703
34.707
^TT^vp sections asjsim
»»QPOSCP.
c®E_sECjietL
|r.rkia>«
1>ND 8 ***^
^ .p^Sc«tiofi --------— ,*p.f*t«
—irr.^.;r— “
forocitknrr ‘"**"**'‘ «nu.—i loc.tio.
•t««P plop** —— 3®^ •>»«P* - — 4«vwir»»ood 8«v€lof»»*«t
___ cy non.conl.^.1,^
BTIMTW*; “SS: I»oP<..- ------- «l.tl«9
••p4lc ——
TAND US^ y
€>CCUpi«^
CXISTXMC p*i„clp»l
mOWSAL .ffcf
^ eonfor.l«9 “••
„.a t. ®' —
prij»clp*A —■»
cpnOitional umm ,-eonfetmU>9 •••
%
STRUCTURES ^
, ^ not ccpiy -“»*
nlSTUK ■«»»**“•
•.fXelonei— -- n>. Imliain9 or — ^ ,mV|
rMloo •• ■*“ tool»«ln« O' “•• * j„, o>«> »®»
biotbi* b-U-i>^ rxi» ,«blt.n-.r- y.r* «l-««*‘oo
_____.U» not rodOC on oniotin^ .oOr -----------------------------
taxes &
MMrCOTV »
assessments
mrrn
c^lnod for t.. p.»ro....
CITY OF ORONO
exhibit 6
Page 1
>ARED FOR: M,r.nif.9
Cuuneil M«etlo9 t***^**
BY; --------
(StaffI
Vja
ligation reviewed BY:
City
• •
City Attorney
city B»gin««*'
illage rlanner
lonlng »A.ini.tr.tor
Pl«nnii»9 Conwi-Pio"
Park Co««mi»»i>o"
^ Public works Coordinator
Public Safety Director
Finance Director
____ Building inspector
Septic inspector
(dates) --------WL---------1---------------
(dates) ^
'■e;
i'4
ecial comments
f
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
APMOVB .pplictioi. ••
_____ MU wiwtX” «“
m
■T,‘»
cT t^^rONO
LAND USE PLANNING
STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS
SUGGESTED FINDINGS
exhibit 6
Page 2
,v
1 ^
\h
X.
____* . ^ ^
5.
.ub.t.„tl.l property ^"‘ceesory for the pre.erv.tlon end enjoyment of .
~r.?. or 9«“r*.r!er;:f:r V"**"" -"J- -y i»P.ir the public he.lth. e.f.ty.
— TelVATxin."^* -y i«P.ir the p„f.uc he.fv., ..f.ty, co-fort. «r.„ or
W.»*or ~"*-Or to the intent of the Co«preh«,.,v. Und p.e
,Pl.nV th."’z:'iS‘cL'r‘*" «"tr.ry to the fnt.nt of the CO»pr.h.„.i.. Und „..
Thm granting of such variance will »»» «
to .ileviet. d««„.tr.t.d h.rd.hlp. or Ti[ni,lirr,convenience to the .ppii„nt. bet i.
*»*• applicant has denonatrated .w. .
variance %«uld awrely aerve » T hardahip or difficulty and ,>. .
u\ J i • convenience to auch applicant. ^ therefore the ,rMing of ,uch
lance ««Duld merely mt
A-
SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
0 ^ aJL
■r
«.