Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-17-1980 Planning PacketI i 1 AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 17, 1980 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL 1. Call to Order/Roll PUBLIC HEARING AND PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETINGS 2.7:30 P.M.#538 Carol Moore/Richard Hawkinson, 4625/4701 West Branch Road - SUBDIVISION 3.7:45 P.M.#539 Jcunes Rivers, 1440 Shoreline Drive - REZONING 4.8:00 P.M.#541 Ministers Life Development Company, Drive - SUBDIVISION 1484 Shoreline ACTION ITEM 5. #542 Don Udell, 1210 Loma Linda Avenue - VARIANCE WORK SESSIOK 6. #543 Loren Butterfield, 3925 Watertown Road - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7. Meeting of March 3, 1980 INFORMATION ITEMS 8. Letter from Thomas Frahm stating his position on #539 & #541 as he will not be at this meeting. rI t 9. comprehensive Plan Draft - Special meeting with Gunnar Isberg, planner, scheduled for April 8, 1980 at 7t30 P.M. 10. Information on Minnesota Planning Association Annual Conference to be held April 9-11, 1980. rv 1 AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 17, 1980 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL 1. Call to Order/Roll OM«..Tr hfarimg and public information meeting^ , 7.30P.M. 1538 carol Moore/Richard HawKinson, 4625/4701 west Branch 2. 7.30 P.M. _ subdivision 3. 7:45 P.M. #539 James Rivers, 1440 Shoreline Drive - REZONING a' 8.00 P.M. 4541 Ministers Life Development Company, 1484 Shoreline4. 8.00 P.M. _ SUBDIVISION action item 5. #542 Don Udell, 1210 Loma Linda Avenue - VARIANCE WORK SESSION *. ,543 Loren Butterfield, 3925 Watertovm Road - CORDITIONAL USE PERMIT approval of minutes 7, Meeting of March 3, 1980 INFORMATION ITEMS 8 Letter from Thomas Frahm stating his position on #539 & #541 as he will not be at this meeting* ’■ sKSa-s Ks.r5.;.’!rs.TS“ ■“ 10. information on Minnesota Plannin, Association Annual Conference to be held April 9 - Ur 19»0« • t 4 ! i t « City of Orono, Minnesota Ai =r" • * « TO: FROM: Planning Commission and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE:February 14, 1980 SUBJECT: #538 Carol Moore, 4701 West Branch Road - SUBDIVISION WORK SESSION Zoning District RR-IB Subdivision - 2 lot plat, total acreage 11.153 Acres Staff has recommended a platting for the two lot division proposed by the Williaun B. Moores. They were advised of the additional expenses involved in a metes and bounds division with lengthy legal descriptions for wetlands and lot configurations such as the one proposed. The Moores want the newly created lot to abut the public road. The City has no problem with lot alignments of this kind in fact it is preferred. Access - access for both lots will be off West Branch Road. Lot 2 will grant a driveway and utilities easement in favor of Lot 1. Applicant should be advised that the City has granted preliminary approval to the Valek plat just to the south of the subject property. A public road coming from the south could provide access to Lot 2. We would recommend increasing the access corridor from 25' to at least 30’. Wetlands - there is approximately 1 to l*s acres of wetlands. We will require a flowage and conservation easement. The wetlands will involve both lots - plan shows only lot I's involvement. Lot Specifications - each lot meets the standards of the RR-IB zoning district. The animal barn is located 150' from the lot line. Septic Testing - Septic testing will be required for the 4.236 acre lot. The existing system on Lot 1 will be inspected by the On-Site Systems Manager and additional area for septic expansion will be reviewed. Dedications required on the plat: 1. Dedication of right of way for VJest Branch Road (Cty. Rd. 15). 2. Dedication of right of way for Highview Lane. 3. Dedication of drainage and utility easements. i I February 14» 1980 1538 Carol Moore/Richard Hawkinson 4701 West Branch Road/4625 West Branch Road SUBDIVISION Page 2 ! I Staff Update - March 13, 1980 ‘ I Access Road - the County will not approve the plat access as proposed. They have no problem with the existing access xf xt ren.axns * private driveway. The minimum sight distance requxred for ® ^ lonlof 570 feel cannot be satisfied. Staff concurs and recommends the plat access be moved further east to a point ]ust east of the existing driveway serving lot 4. We would require at least a 40 length curb cut; at entrance point the road could extend . parallel to West Branch Road to a more central location and then start tSripproach southward. See Exhibit B. The 50' allow the developer to save many mature trees located xn roadway servTnrfots 1 and 3. I have enclosed a map designating the unimproved public roads in the area as requested. See Exhibit A. Staff has not received the septic test information. ^11 prelimina y approval must be withheld by the Planning Commission until staff has submitted septic report for your approval. • » I . 1« li* ikw*<- I .rf. f • V •. V /I ^ /y //^ '£ku.-tut 1 % ^ i- r a *• IT4^^^nty 4- J • RQ'^P Jo szx« '.A A. t*‘»0'% (fi^ '-••’<■ l:oo j *•/'##< /•• -4 *1 I I / . c. rn i j^ I Tl# mm o P. I ^ (}«x\ T Sii^ J Z^JsSt • L. ••I .ss« //K -I < i'^ f at rtc*« ^af| j.v;> # J /. •• ■y-i ,j 1. ,• I 1 M *.. ’• • ^-'" —(T^v/." I P-a-fct u.| ~~ f .*«• »* J J i ’orfV£ D8 75 i / i I • LAUD ' |5 I — 1 ^• * * I •»• a- . 1Q) /' •. Im HC 1233 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST OEMRTMENT OF FINANCE A-605 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 tIST SIZE 300' Ov^ONO I CERTIFY TMiT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ON THIS CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE­ SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION. TO THE REST OF MY RNOWLEOl AND BELIEF. HCNNC^IN CO. FINANCE DIVISION DATP. 2-/3~ Kd av FEE OWNER TAX RATER/ MAILING ADDRESS lS-6> T-in 12.-‘23 X>£AiJ k . >s-72l/^ Voaj O lD ^?oc^ ui. MOUAJD A/7^. ^^^34.4 -4^ ’ AS ^ ^ J /> I meutY s^e>&e\iXK. ■^. Sx-jn 1Z.-23 TOomas DAI//^ I. T^A! &!=C* ^ K.AV J . Mll^RAjiee^ t55L5 - 32A/-0 AiAe. a7. vv»? MaJ. PROPERTa^ ADDRESS -3^. O m 3i -z/ J- A^^&ARrr •i-LL^ u>. ISE/UiC// >ec/? -----A7Al. ^ . I I^ICMA^O 13. MAli.llCJ^S6Y\ jACtiC>n(nii!iT^M^ SSALd. ^0£JA£C> A. (^,J/UMP <s^\\ j i KaJili j/rjjnn /% r^AAj^/: a}P-B 70/ 37/^ /»W/l/a^ >?c C*/VPt/y C^AS^ Mb 20015w • • , * Z2 I S ane!- ^^Q-pegT/ O'Z.ONO THC FACTS REPRCSENTEO ON THIS AN ACCURATE AND TRUE RERRE- IFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS BOROS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY N. TO THE REST OF MY KNOWLEOt NANCE DIVISION TE ^ y ^ g V PROPERTat ADDRESS '3^ , rr^ oir--^ <u> 3^ '22 / 1 j^u-a^ccn"-1 <S»EDT£irT/1~f------- ■ • HC 1233 t.department of finance A-eoS GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS^ MN 55487 property owners iirt LIST SIZE_u^Si fee owner TAX PAYER/ MAILING ADDRF5;<; HENNEPIN CO. FINANCE DIVISION ------------DATf_^*^~^0 , -----------\u^eCT R ,^VXA» ^o,._----------D. ,.s TUT SbV\vii.x^ ^ -------------------------------------— C-Wex»>^ Q.VvftVg \a A. 'Z-CaOt ^ ' w property address 4 O ^ Dy v-uJ-----—* jl ^&***^'*~A *SeUt^\v^»ve^ ^(LfV>r\ee>o ^7- /y-7- - <L."Y« vl A.% * # _ . i — li M «. *o ' V rv' «Tk j^sgu Sy^;»»W lOovvuooeA i:k..Wo V ^ »o «. ? \ ^ VA eer, ^ Skt» ^^2>og f Ui l.peAiO KvAk I g.A .SS^fc^ blpt6 co^ria^^L^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -S^VIooM-w ^ U 4o- lo p 5 S3 Cd/ljj£^7~f?z » L---------—----------- MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 19, 1980 The Planning Commission met on the above date. Present were the following members: Chairman Hammerel, Adams, Frahm, Hannah, McDonald and Wilson. Mabusth represented the City staff. The Chairman asked that all action items be postponed until agenda items involving the public were reviewed. ATTENDANCE 7:30 P.M. The work session for the Carol Moore Subdivision was introduced. Mabusth reviewed the changes in the application since the staff memo was written. Richard Hawkinson, the abutting property owner to the east, has joined in the subdivision application. The plat will now consist of a four lot division with a private road designated by a 50' road outlot. There is a designated wetland of approximately 2+ acres that we will require a flowage and conservation easement over. Planning Commission questioned the need to acquire future road right-of-way to the southern lot line. Wilson noted before a determination could be reached, a plan showing the existing and unimproved roads in the surrounding neighborhood would have to be reviewed. Staff will submit plan for the Planning Commission meeting of March 17, 1980. Staff was asked to recheck the ordinances to see if a setback variance for the animal barn from the east lot line of Lot 2 is required. The applicants were advised to have the agent responsible for the septic testing on the subdivision to contact the on-site systems memager. Planning Commission called for a Ptiblic Information Meeting on March 17, 1980. CAROL MOORE 4701 W. Branch Road SUBDIVISION Work Session (#538) Planning Commission reviewed the telephone poll taken of each member giving unanimous approval to the rezoning application of James McCleary. The property will be rezoned to LR-lA, Lakeshore Residential, 2-acre minimvun lot size. McCleary will continue with a limited marina operation for the 1980 season. Wilson moved to recommend approval of the McCleary rezoning agreement. Motion seconded by Hammerel. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously. STUBBS BAY REZONING Planning Commission Recommendation { HENNEPIN ,t»*L c:DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. touth /a ^Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 935-3381 cm: 77 O |\ Ms Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal ^*y$ MN 55323 FEB ii6 1S3C CITY OF ORONO Dear Ms Mabusth: Proposed Plat - "William Moore Plat" CSAH 151 Approx. 400 ft. east CSAH 19 So. side CSAH 151 Section 7, Township 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No 811 Review and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and found it acceptable with consideration of these conditions; - The 1976 Hennepin County Transportation System Study (HCTSS) recommends future municipal jurisdiction for the portion of CSAH 151 from CSAH 19 south intersection to CSAH 19 north intersection. The existing 40 ft. of right of way is enough for any future Hennepin County upgrading of CSAH 151. The existing access point on the east property line fails by 130 -ft. to meet tne 570 ft. minimum sight distance for 45 mph to the drivers right. Since this access exists it can remain open as a driveway but any upgrading to street standards will be denied by Hennepin County until the hill east of the access is cut down. A good street access is at the top of this hill. i Any new access onto a County road or revision of existing access requires an approved Hennepin County entrance permit. See our Traffic Division for entrance permit forms. All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. See our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer » i: ’ ;» a ffsa lAWO «SF. P1AMWTMC II A M.: r*\nf ^i.: .•^Jiniam Moore Plat" page 2 - The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt ^erely. Oames M. Wold, P.E. Chief, Planning and Programming I JMW/LDW:de UO£.MANNING ZONUIC VARIANCE API^ICATlnN exhibit 1 #541 ^TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator March 14, 1980 SUBJECT: #541 Ministers Life Development Company 1484 Shoreline Drive - SUBDIVISION Staff Update - March 10, 1980 As an information item, the Council reviewed the proposed plat for the Halpin Estate. Council was in complete agreement; the existing access serve the prop>osed plat. They questioned the extent of the dedication requested by the County and reflected on the unfair burden placed on a single developer. They all agreed the proposed realignment with the accompanying increase in speeds would create greater hazards for any access abutting County Road 15. They decided a designated setback area for each lot abutting County Road 15 of approximately 150' %iould prevent any hardships in the future if such a realignment ever takes place. In response to the issue of the riparian outlets on Smiths Bay, they agreed with the Planning Commission that every attempt be made to keep the landscaping intact and not force the developer to sacrifice the proposal because of the riparian issue. Council member Hurr stated she could not approve the sxibdivision if the 200* width of lakeshore frontage was not met. The Mayor noted that the average of lineal footage for each of the six lots is approximately 230 feet. Staff Update - March 11, 1980 The Mayor met with the developer and reviewed the Council's concerns. He discussed the environmental concerns for Smiths Bay and doubted if Council would approve three docks located in such a shallow bay area. He noted an outlot for riparian access could be created for Lot 6 on Tanager Lake side. He suggested that no more than two riparian outlots be created on Smiths Bay. The developer has submitted new plans reflecting these recommendations. Please review the letter from Tom Frahm dated March 13, 1980. Reports still outstanding: 1) Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and 2) Hennepin County Highway Department. If the Planning Commission determines that a recommendation for preliminary approval can be voted on at your March 17, 1980 meeting, your motion should consider the following points: 1. Access road - approve existing access on County Road 15. Engineering plans for plat road to be submitted upon preliminary approval of Council. Plat road shall be designated as an outlot - City to acquire underlying easements for road and utility purposes. Lot 2 to grant a private driveway easement in favor of Lot 3. U ut' n. i \\\\\ i; j a m ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION exhibit 1 March 14, 1980 #541 Ministers Life Dev. 1484 Shoreline Drive SUBDIVISION Page 2 2. Riparian rights - all lots to have riparian rights; three lots to have direct access and three to acquire access by individual lakeshore outlets. Riparian access for Lot 6 can be created by extending Lot 6's lot line through east side of Lot 1. This outlet must have 200* of lakeshore frontage (see Exhibit A). Outlets A & B created by County Road 15 - outlet on Tanager Lake created by road outlet. 3. Variances - Outlets A & B do not meet required 200' width. Hardships - not able to acquire additional frontage on Smiths Bay -* overall lakeshore frontage for six lots can be satisfied 4. Lot requirements - all lots meet area and dimension requirements. With the creation of the riparian outlot on Tanager Lake, Lot 1 may need an area variance if the developer cannot realign Lots 1 & 2's mutual lot line to make up the difference. 5. Septic requirements - approve per on-site manager's report noting specific concern that steps be taken by developer to protect drainfield area of Lot 1 during the period of road construction. . *T 1 ^ J fPZ J an^S^HnnS —^ ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION 1233 property owners list department of finance A-603 government CENT MINNEAPOLIS, MN EXHIBI^ tlST silg_ SOO PEE OWNER m t, II TAX paver/ mailing ADDBPgg i'2/s' N tr ys-qii ^ «ij:'* AHO BEUCF. * * ^^*** KMOWLCOCC HENNEPIN CO. FINANCE DIVISION DATE. property address 10 .GE^CD /MlLi<l n I II j ------------- ^ T M> ----------------------- p-/( T>M7 Tg-:z^ BtfAT ^ SOTFcy Ctj U n, Ha V ---------T-. n iil---UJOf^lcc. IfT; • ,-jf^ ^V*l - XAwl&i„^JS~ --------------LLi^1Z4_-rV G£31_'P SCHMi« « t AiVja/sojv----- iT g /V\«-r -2£___gLH^ggL/A/L-r rM7 "Z40O 3ltts Ai/S" «. /yiFLS I sr<to4 rgii I o rtt/k'f-/ I »i.'j£- -----^.Mg'ggVj/yrr T-p . H ?*? C L^inc: Vj-r. -^2^——SHflEEZ/Vir t>R AI a -y| 6 ? n * ^ t • • Igi*^ T ta KUM/p IV,-,. ^i,.-..e., ^-,- ^ Jofj A C.VA/A/ fir I . f £lftie T ecyjj aiB -----------see 4-r,,vi.-________ / % / OgQ Nn l FACTS REFRCSENTCO ON THIS •cconate and TNUE NEANE- t this M OF THf NCNNCFIN COUIITY ro THE OEST OF MY KNOWLCOOE CE DIVISION ^T6?ECTV « VARIANCE application —.■-... # n 4- s'------'I ""’.IT..... ' 'i applicant ^ ------- </y/^ 9/ i>p I * ***t*im Addr««* J-MM / ~ A ------j J AGENl Mofith/Ycar) parcels of land! « > ire Neilijig A^reti [5. notices f ---------^pplicent f 6.>^ PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT '^.^PR' ENTUSE -..-.u. _u/,..„, V.c«u-,------- F.c.t request / ----- B„iidin,(,) J^ti*.. or ^CONSTRUCTION CpST $ ^ (?('7i'7 »' -be r«,ue,t ta detail. -3JJ T-r ~ _________] .')C^RIANCE(S) required t. a , «« CO do the ra^uaatad Vork: *^tk.ck u/ rrone Wtdtii ^ ^ W) OthT --------- 0. Desctlbe UNOSUAL PROPERTT CONDITIONS __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _— ----------O >^maL amlcu^n --------------------------------------- — WORK c p-i-euT;;;;^—— property oumpd r«v«lr«d «r W*mL*J OlUSt Applicant 6 Signature Date AI!I!M^TIQKr^JFyLnT_!r_Aj«sL exhibit 1 l54:S list of exhibits fiss£xl*aa S?£b(2U^i- * Appiieatloa Fon I —"y Uac ^1 * af Survai — «^€tpt §£fa( Sftf Mat Hap * *"v«titoty Staff fi£hEI_Infom5^ ' ^ VTi 8 »T?_4_i2£iZ Mdtk **9»lraiaetiu: rtet >c af plication. ***^*** *• thla -„i III,, • •**»y Mte ali. : __ ' •^••elpattaa ite He 12^33 ^ --------- ywoPERTY oumieHs ii«t 66f*RTMEMT OF FINANCE A-60J OOVENNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS; MN SS487 I? !LitT Size OWNER PAYER / mailing ADDRFQg Is > 9 T>Ii7 X-Z^ * CEMTIFy THAT tu/ SsSs — CCRTIFICATC AME AN ACCUNAT iT^^*®**^^® ®** •ewTATioN OP mFon£S!rnM OATE ON THE NECOROS OF tJl* ^^^tARS THIS WHANCE OlVItlON. TO T^Te SEs/oH’*""* ®®"^ ^0 RCUEP. * •*RT OP MY KNOIfLEOSE «»««» eo. n«„e o,,..,., 2.ZC.S^date . ■1 !rrj] property address ^(2'/4 ^/V/^4,q Obiri/ , “---------------------l_W»g 40/VV a L INj\A [S-g T-//-7 -P-7? / SCHUCH/ira ^/^/[nw ,T,- (I CH/i/AJ oi/ I. ^Ami/vD ^(Ip|tippiA/~------jli^o Coma L i no a l \ht ^ utiGLj —a //v/)/8 g<g - 25 L»m=7f_ . git I s sr ~ ST /»1fr g^0VA<-T> J !>>;a/a/ J'Z^O- SPK.U/ 12 3o ^pR.ur g pt ^B£tT ^ V/\/V'TA^rrf I, —1^^^ —-------------------------------- ^_________________________________ ^-lA/r^A SO ST :re^peETj/ 0 l-g/H/4- C.iA/nA- ^ 2 I : ‘ t r V /i - ..-O',. •• • . »i, V 7r^??{55SS^ I'\ vet; • • ; . * ^ / I K,. >• -rV > fJrr/" /V* • ;-:v- • I • B.-*. w4x: ’.’.u •; ^^2 l‘* . • bu.*u.: -4 i-ijL % *o. ^ t*ii«q n«tk. §•« • plat* at k.t. t3inai ol teatfr »# • • r-» • *>t ♦ fj-•> cv ar « ft««avc« «a • • t •a .. >•'. i.;1 catM IriiM .* M.n P Ufa 1 ••# 1 tM IHa Ipfin ll.o fttt «f Ut ).fi»Ak 7 J—«dlHa ►p4a <*r»^*y,-i''t Talal •!•• wp !• iCI f««t IfM CiBiartlM • I biSAki»)f .......... *wi j A j«« I • • • • . I* *«7* •a. •«■••• >71 ,« >1 ^ f k> • ilBIT 5 »istrict ^ Dt StCDOIt CC»C StCTlPf TOTAL VXIOAMCZ r ».f,_____CODC SECTIO 31.831 34.302 34.203 34.203 34.202 CODC SCCTtOf £13r^ 3 /. 3 3<P ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY variances required --------Wjmwuw m»JU^hm ACTUAL ___________ lot Wiatk _ J Zoning Use District LB. VAWIAwrg CODE StCTlOW SETBACKS ^IKIWH Rff^ulTT. EXI5T1MC * So ^ PROPOSED^VAJllXVCX COPE SECT108 3 ^ ti rt. « Tt. HARDCOVER Wild o - LOT AJtXA jesx. p-f. I^IRAtJTTEll hakdcovea «.f . OC2STLKC haadcover «.f. 34 Ft. FROPOSO) MAKDCOVER ■*JLt_______ TOTAL variance O - 7S rt. ox J ^ . jXok. 7S - 350 Ft. 35X */ 2 ^ ^ ^■■ Tf y ^ o JS ^OOC StCT|l 31.831 i« 3SO - 500 Ft. 34.202 34.202 SOO - 1000 Ft.34.202 Other sections Bvildino »«lght (brjk .I 34.302 —. PClsTntc FROPQSCD VARIAWCg CODE SECTICW Forking CmIa.I Sjy ^ ft:e.e<Yffy y _____ yP 3/. 33<o LAND oivisicass _v^pi«t AVA3LA3JL2TYt ------- _____ unpl*tt«a leta/p.rr«la (« | ^ v.c.nt TOFOCkAFHY includes •t««p alopsa . f vacant « 1.^975 CX^,r.Mp jTT.lngl, „p~, iHora X . ^ . lota/parcttla per occuplad •Ppllcatlon laXaahora M9L "« thi. .ppl,c.r,o„wetlands ITTlLlTlESt City ••ptic ayatw ■—^^>odad areas , ... -l^^‘'t*»9 JL cl^ _____ eounty/.t.t. y ••wet _ svailable __ _ _ _- - - -pclwats LAND USE nsv proposed - «®~>«ctad; City water sxistlng confonsi^ ««istin9 '^'confoniljiy Subject lot is vacant “Js:: _____------- priT.ctp.1 _yr_ .cc.ory bulJdU,, or ...conforeing nae conditional non-oonfoming ese STRUCTURES reeiMM OOMA PPOMXAL . — ----^ n^im, .. not buildij.. or ... I«...12. r.W.. ., «PA«10N „ r’r _ E.l.tl», boUdio, FAIA HAWCET^ALOr (Jl” —■ '^^ll not reduce an __ “ ^will not reduce en enistinQ -ub,tand:;^ard'":^i;::^ -^1 TAXES & ASSESSMENTS FsoFEinrr id . ^‘•^^■’cals owned in coMain am ***«. ------- .r. PAID *.r,.„t-H_ «.» P-rpo..., Aaaaaaaants Laviadi — *Fver (no)units •'•tsr (no)units A C% W.* ><. 4«J* Strict LB. SCCTIOW CODE SECTIQg 3^ ^>5^3 CODE SECTK 31.831 34.303 34.303 34.302 34.203 =v 3/ 33.0 /• *-----------— . Owner sKip »ot In this ■ppllest ion Mila isting "“-«©n£ox» ing - ®oo-oonfoi*ij|g umm T-s H prepared FOR; W***"!". a-'-ell Huetin, |u,t„ »st«ff| ___________ ^2 application reviewed BY; * ^^^loiatrator Attorn.y «ty Buin.., yianncr aonin, Adnini.trator Mannijiy Cow.i,,io„ y»rk OonnissiMi ■ e«>oxdi„.to, ■ **'«ty Olracto, rinmnem Wr.ctor »“‘lai"9 ln,p.cto, Saptlc Inspaetor special comments taJi tf-p i^-r^ ^ ^rl 'FF recommendation Ayypovr .pp„c.„.„ .. APPIWW .pplic.ti«, ..fe. ^ *>imr •pplicstion for raaarw. '•••on. ootad abov - "•""•pin Cty. DOT t H • Stat« DOT * ONx ' 1 MCi«D • ■ >; LNCD - . ■■* »■ ^ #1 TO; FROM: Planning Coimnisslon and Council Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator #54O DATE:March 13, 1980 SUBJECT: #543 Loren Butterfield, 3925 Watertown Road CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WORK SESSION - MARCH 17, 1980 Zoning District RR-IA Lot Size - 20 Acres Ordinances Pertaining to Application: 34.025 Conditional Use Permit for greenhouse 32.480 Conditional Use Permit for non-conforming uses Mr. Butterfield seeks a conditional use permit to allow the replacement of an existing greenhouse 36' X 100', construction of a storage shed 30* X 60' to be attached to an existing greenhouse and construction of a new greenhouse 60' X 190'. Mr. Butterfield received his first "formal" Conditional Use Permit in September of 1972 to allow the commercial greenhouse operation and approve the existing buildings. In the succeeding years, he has requested conditional use permits to construct additional greenhouses on his 20 acre site. Council has approved each application and to my knowledge has never set a limit as to the size of the operation. The nursery operation covers approximately a quarter of his property. The City has had no problem with the Butterfield Nursery. All of the proposed structures meet the setbacks of the RR-IA Zoning District. The following items were reviewed in previous applications: 1. packing requirements on site for employees 2. equipment to be stored under cover 3. screening from surrounding residential neighborhood Operation today involves minimal number of employees - part time if^ any - feunily run operation. There is no retailing done on the premises so customer parking considerations are not necessary. Points to be reviewed with this application: 1. Screening - especially for 60' X 190' greenhouse bordering the 2. 3. Luce Line. Topography on east side of lot m-ikes screening most difficult and staff does not feel at this time necessary to address. Limitation on operation - there have been no major changes in the surrounding neighborhood - no signs of increased development. P.C. may not wish to even address this issue, but you should be aware of the need to review this issue with any application involving an intensification of use. Changes in lighting of the nursery as a result of the new construction. . •* ' t •t •3 r V oad ng uses allow the replacement of a storage shed and construction of ived his first "formal" ow the commercial dings. In the permits to construct il has approved each nit as to the size proximately a quarter the Butterfield E the RR-lA Zoning ^vious applications: rhood ss - part time if done on the premises :y« se bordering the ss screening most necessary to address, ijor changes in the id development. P.C. )u should be aware of :ion involving an of the new construction. *.. Legal Description - // / - x ^ applicant ?) /Ss* ■AW • W w/ ---- Sjal^ivisioig o Lot WiTel 4^-- - - - * — Ke^oning $250 Riprap $15 (§55) Present Zoning i^Present Use Date Rec-d .S- aVa ✓zoning ordinance Section Relating to Request ✓specify Ordinance Requirements _____ ^Plai^ your request and reasons for same IX cJlA , C' VARIANCE required - extend- rsrsfts:r"pr^t ' Specify hardships Other, explai Rear SUBDIVIS lOBLapplic^ ion Residential oagF, explain No. of Lots t»V- CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHPo i ^ ■— - «Pl-n proposed use of property i„ detail MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSAnv i?r>T> Must be submitted 10 days prior to Plannl^^Com^rrsiS^^meeting) ABiglication completed PLst map section .^rtificate of survey of propertv P«^s,fo* construction plans, if applicable 5. Hena p^ C^. <pTai;e*’^°" A-603 Government Center Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#ic Applicant's Signature O^er • s Signature j 've list the Zoning A^i^istratL,^city''^gi^^^ informiyion and _______ ' v-ity Engineer, Citv a «-4>aand Council all Engineer,~ci;7i;t“,"^*f?f^^"q«ested by s this application CommissionCouncil necessary to process thi« J 1 • ^ Attorney, Plan^ fees as established by ordinance. further <3 ^ "I? agrees to pay 5/78 17. So t2 l>a fc t’ I.'- . :iINUTES OF A REGULAR MELTING HELD SEPTEIiiJER 25, 1972 Butler moved, McCarthy seconded, that the ^linnegasco utility permit for 425 Bro\im Road South, be approved. ?lotion. Ayes (4) - Ways (0). McCarthy moved, Butler seconded, that the Council finds that the various buildings, structures and enclosures of glass, plastic or similar material which are used to maintain suitable conditions under which plants may be grown, are in fact "greenhouses" under Section 34.025 of the Village Code and that Mr. Loren Butterfield has and is conducting a commercial greenhouse operation at the premises located at 3925 MVatertowi Road. Tlie Council further finds that the existing use of the open fields for the growing of flowers falls within the definition of a crop farm under Section 30,040 of the Orono Municipal Code. Page 2 UTILITY PERMIT Minnegasco CONniTIONAL USE PERMIT 3925 IVa ter town Road Therefore, it is recommended to approve the issuance of a conditional use permit to Mr. Loren Butterfield for each of the structures, buildings and enclosures of glass, plastic or similar material existing on this date. This conditional use permit will be effective when i!r. Butterfield has supplied to the Village Administrator all the information required by the Orono Code and this information is to be furnished by October 1, 1972. Motion, Ayes (4) Ways (0), Mr. William Wear was not present and he was removed from the agenda. Council instructed the Administrator to inform Mr, Wear that * le Council has no information from liim on what his request nay have been and that if he wishes to come before the Council at a future time he must make a new request to be put on the agenda. It is requested that he bring detailed plans of any proposal that he may have. Tne Village Council instructed the Adminis­ trator to contact Mr. Robert Dongoske and ask him to appear before the Council at its next regular meeting of October 9, 1972, to answer questions regarding his request. Butler moved, McCarthy seconded, that the variance of Josepli Lofrano, 3365 Crystal Bay Road, be approved. Motion, Ayes (4) - iJays (0). .IcCart.iy moved, Butler seconded, tiiat the variance of Rex Ressler, 3683 North Shore Drive, be approved, but to include the Planning Commission restrictions. Motion, / it ^ _____________________________________________________________ #543 BUILDING PERMIT William Wear DIVISION 4250 Forest Lake Drive VARIANCE 3365 Crystal Bay Road VARIANCE 3683 North Shore Drive