HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-16-1981 Planning Minutesscs TT ■” ^
L*'J. ; r."
agenda
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 16, 1981
COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 P.M.
rv
h
•• •• .
jel
- .U'*
CALL TO ORDER
1. Call to order/Roll
PUBLIC HEARING
2. #568 Daryle Uphoff
2497-99, 2501-03 Kelly Ave.
Preliminary Subdivision
ACTION ITEMS
3. #563 Stephen Ward
4695 North Sixth Dr.
Final Subdivision
4. #597 Verne Hubbell
3340 Watertown Rd.
Conditional Use Permit
5. #606 De Ell Pugh
692 Tonkawa Road
Variance .
6. #507 Jon Nelson and William Creer
3701 Shoreline Drive
Commercial Building Plan Review
*
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
7. Apprpval of the minutes of March 2, 1981.
n m u.
^yfr S’** > y ;v
'i -V
'i?:
_.
.•
«^>. ,jqr" »
, '4
m
b.
••• J
3
w.j.
iv.:;;:
^V.- ■ ^\. * • .'*
planning comhission minutes of march 16. 1981
The Commission met on the above date
members were present: Adams
*^cDonald. Rovegno, and act-
wa"l abseS?!»* John*S?mmeJel
E":
and’^to'nn??e®“ru'"®*'* motion to table
Wi?i*be tlkeJIat the A^rii *'’«^P''esent application
able to act at this point. reason-
revllied'*the“sMhd5'®- P''®*®"*- Habusth members: subdivision for the new
George Rovegno noted that the newlv
Sf*?Se“. i°?n* sSa%3a*?Ji
noted Mabusth
Werde ’’"® '■earrangement. Mr.Wards house now meets the setback
standards of the subject zoning district.
Goetten moved to approve the lot line
Cove subject to the findings and con-
tiSn?"' resou.
Nays‘’(0)?‘'°''‘'*‘' Adams. Vote: Ayes (6),
The applicant, Verne. Hubbell, was present
Cy Ducharme. 3405 High Lane, was also present.
MUk^^fk®**®®?®® bbe engineer's report, minUfJ? '•®''<ewed the findings and recom- mendations noted at the site inspection.
attendance
7:30 P.M.
DARYL UPHOFF
2497-99, 2501-03
Kelly Avenue
Preliminary Sub
division #568
Public Hearing 7:30 - 7:31
STEPHEN WARD
4695 North Shore Dr
Final Subdivision #563
7:31 - 7:45
VERNE HUBBELL
3340 Watertown Rd.
Conditional Use
Permit #597
7:45 - 8:30
m
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 16, 1981
The site appeared to be In operation for
quite a few years. It appeared that the
majority of the drainage was to the rear
of the property and neighboring properties
have sustained no damage.
Cook would recommend removal of the fill
In the designated wetland area and removal
of concrete blocks itnd large rocks to allow
for proper ma1ntev;*»^*e. Side of fill area
to be graded to 4:1 slope. Hay bales to be
placed along edge of the wetlands to prevent
sedimentation.
Hubbell stated the operation has been going
on for 15 years.
Jabbour moved to table the Conditional Use
Permit subject to the review of the City
Engineer's report at the April 6th meet
ing of the Planning Commission.
Motion was seconded by Goetten. Vote
Ayes (6), Nays (0)
Mr. and Mrs. Pugh were present. No one
else was present to address application.
Staff advised that the application re
quired a lot width variance because In
affect we are dealing with a new home.
Staff noted that the setback of the exist
ing houses are all set back farther than
the 75ft. setback and therefore, an average
setback determination is necessary, an average
lakeshore setback for the lakeshore deck
and an average setback for the principle
structure. The purpose of all Is to protect
the lakeshore view of the existing homes.
Jabboup moved to approve the lot area and
lot width variance of De Ell Pugh subject
to the finding that the property has been
accessed for sewer, there Is an existing
structure and there was no additional
land available and subject to the following
condltions;
1. The removal of the garage by the road.
2. Must connect to City Sewer
3.Proposed principal must meet average
lakeshore setback of adjacent prIncIpAl
structure.
Page 2
CON'T.
VERNE HUBBELL
3340 Watertown Rd.
Conditional Use
Permit #597
7:45 - 8:30
DE ELL PUGH
692 Tonkawa Rd.
Variance #606
8:30 - 8:45
i
tjdi.
o
1
m
o
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 16, 1981 PAGE 3
4.Proposed lakeshore deck must meet
average lakeshore setback of ad
jacent decks.
5. The subject accessory deck may not
be enclosed.
6. New survey will be required for
building permit to verify these
setbacks.
Motion was seconded by Goetten. Vote
Ayes (6) Nays (0).
Nelson was present, no one else present
to address application.
Mabusth noted that ordinance requires
the Planning Commission to review and
make recommendations to council on all
Commercial Building Plans.
She reviewed Building Inspector's
review of the preliminary building
plans, there were no major problems.
The Planning Commission asked staff to
review final site plan for the Office
Building Project approved in January.
Planning Commission raised questions
concerning code requirements for
various features proposed for the
building. Staff advised the entire
project will meet code standards.
Frahm still voiced concern that the
existing sewer and drainage problems
have not been properly addressed.
Adams moved to approve the preliminary
building plans for Nelson-Creer Office
Complex subject to the report of the
bullding official.
Motions seconded by Rovegno. Vote
Ayes (5), Nays (1)
Frahm noted that drainage and sewer
facilities are still inadequate in
the area and his position on this
application is consistent with his
previous position.
Frahm moved to approve the minutes as
amended. Motion seconded by Adams.
Vote Ayes (6) Nays (0)
JON NELSON-WM. CREER
3701 Shoreline Drive
Commercial Bldg. Plan
Review #507
8:45 - 9:00
.4^: . .. ‘v
- h *. V-;
Hi
I
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
March 2, 1981
CREER
Drive
g. Plan
IS
lUTES
planning cohhission minutes of march 16. 1981 Rage 4
x:.'
■■•V
Mabusth Introduced the VISITORS INTRODUCED
and
' IS’T
•rt' .'Meeting adjourned;
• -V-::
. ■ v *‘>v.
■
■ . i\
Jf. V-
■ r
.r > "'i' ■■■■
•'VI
rr-^m
adjournment AT9:00 PM
mr
^yf-
-.V
Pimm
4
'■ ' • K* ' .• • • . ■ V.V
K-- r ."
M
» ") •» : c V - ■.^Jl rTT.-0. ^ •••; ■ •..•.-V^- i- •.•
-r :';. .
..■■■••• :f'
'T'-
. •" • . .
vr • -V ‘
•:•: :• fv-'vv/^: v-;V-