Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-15-1981 Planning Packet
* i »I ^ ■ ' AGENDA (cont.) Work Session 15. 1626 C.E. Van Eechout, 1025 North Brown Rd. Subdivision Information Items 16. July 6/ 1981, meeting of the Planning Commission has been canceled. 17.Planning Commission representatives to Council meetings for the month of July; Gabriel Jabbour - July 13, 1981 George Rovegno - July 27, 1981 Approval of Minutes 18. Approval of the minutes of June 1, 1981. •S 4 ^IinA ^(P /o*t /Xi /s^/l&A t TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth June 10, 1981 SUBJECT; #585 George Hussman, 3660 Shoreline Drive Preliminary Subdivision Park Commission report The Park Commission feels there is adequate area in the Daniels Park facility to handle the additional children from the Navarre subdivision. The area of the park consists of 5, 50' X 150' lots. The park will be designed specifically for younger children - grassed areas with playground equipment. Your approving recommendations should contain the following points: to recommend preliminary approval of the Navarre plat for 24 residential units based on the finding that the subdivision meets the allowed density use for the LR-lC-1 district and that there is adequate sewer and water service available to the subject area; such approval is subject to the following conditions: 1) Plat road, to be named Wiley Place, is to be a public road (30' pavement, 80' diameter cul de sac, 7 ton cap acity) . Obtain new permit from Hennepin County Highway Department if necessary - right turn lane at west end of property is required. 2) Holding Pond designated as an outlet with 15' easement designation for storm sewer wetwork. City to require a flowage and conservation easement over retention pond. M.C.W.D. must review this proposal. 3) Developer must submit grading, planting and erosion con trol plans. 4) Developer is responsible for extension of sewer and water service to each unit. 5) Dedicate 7' of additional right of way on County Road 15, Dedicate 15' of additional right of way on Blaine Avenue. Dedicate 5' for walkway. Dedicate drainage easements over entire pond area. 6) Developer to submit copy of proposed Homeowners Association Articles of Incorporation bylaws and protective coven ants providing for common ownership and maintenance of pond and walking outlots. Enter into a Subdivider's Agreement (to be completed be fore improvement construction begins) to include con struction cost estimate, commencement and completion date estimates, performance bond or letter of credit and war rantee bond. #585 George Hussman (Cont.) 8) Payment of the following fees: ^ $1,300/bldg • Park. Dedication fee 3«i^ P X 12 = 15,600. iyn ($75.00 each)2 - Street signing: 1 name and 1 stop sxg = $150.00. fimps in the amount of3 - Legal review fees and filing fees m r $27 5 00 c! Slw« iaw«l'’-°ins?elle<j by developer - no d) sewer'unita - 24 x $225 - $5,400 to be paid with e, Srt«'"lltiraf-installed by developer - no f, rter^unite - 19 =o:™ercial units assessed ex- ceeds 24 residential units VmIA - .1C 1233 LItT Stic PRQPgRTY OWNERS LIST OCPARTMCNT OF FINANCE A-603 OOVENNMCNT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS^ MN 05487 n^oMO I ceUTIFY THAT TMt FACTS CCAT.F.CATC AAt AH i:" "^h ”SCHTATIOH of IHFOHMATIOH At IT AMCAHf TH t OATC ON TMS FINANCC division, TO THt ifST OF MV and seucF. HCHMT^’IN CO. FINANCt-ylMV^^ OATC FEE OWNER TAX PAVER/ MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY AD N/ Rj CX, fi , 7^U- f'tFfTU -Fi. P/.lU // A " a-1V/A7V 'ZJ’ MAT A^rt\/Ar/L N/^7HA-XM/\kil / ( wif /j -V ^ /A. / tirr?.-'tlAXiAihiL iL Pi ^Li/1) 3.mjc- ' 7/>^ SH(^f^e- 7>£ i hA/j/A^Ai k'A'i3C>^JilSsM^ P t\'ii- AL . ^ /T /) A i / /\ IV / / -r / V// a/\f// a:/CVa/i^;/V/ 7 r^vr /n M * '/ ' ORONO I FACTS SCPRCSCNTCO ON THIS ACCURATE AND TRUE RERRE- IMATION At IT ARREARS THIS IDS OR TNE NEHNERIN COUNTY ro THE REST OR MV KNOIRfaCOSE ROPERTY ADDRESS 34 M/.t- i (//-^/ z f(e It 15 I ) 3 7^ SaemTAf/-r 4 NOT 7 330^ T>£t /B722JU^r A^az/e p- f)Uf/li22 Me \JL ''' PROPERTY OWNERS LIST OEnkRTMCNT Or FINANCE A-609 OOVENNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN SS487 yx) OROA/O I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ON THIS CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE-* SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS |T APPEARS THIS DATE ON TNE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION. TO THE REST OF MY RNOMt^EOSE AND RELIEF. HENNEPIN CO. FINANCE-DIVISION V?: FEE OWNER TAX PAYER/ MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY ADI^I^ESS 7 S-r; 1/17 K-75 34 ■g- U Ry c:r.A//.' 7 G 1 yU N A//r G t VyfH / . J,'-iyo c HC ///A^'y/irA. / fN A 'Tj-: ‘ iV Z '^(74^/e . 7-^U- —^ r-j-r /-■* *• —* iJ"/ NiE?fu-XM A\! T--------------------------------------------------- 7.- Sot>E-f:rH. &7iFf/,V It fi. p£y-U<p -7. Pn •"A/7X7%^’/(/ )f|j ^17 //13 A/A/:y 0, Rlppfm- „ / /Y/*' C) , TapEA C-ORPOm-j 1A7J y3o.r yofCLifi^L Xtz/a) 3777) SHYmufT/-? 7 /, " //MOUN D NOT 1 n //It //'' ^ ?yy) shc Rsane T)£ CHARUTTIE 1CE7/:7C A)L/AWr\^/1)A N, f lUft-U tJ57?yJ/jz.T. iyst^/Y^^ 1 A'7777"^'ln^'^'6 /l/ircM 'Z- A7/ (4 p \1IL (',R/hl7 /V/ 7 / ^/C N 7" ^ th,- 3ut/N/Y ME \j! RJ7. Pun p, /z/}N<-u^y/;r ;rI'lert /cv<7>rd " / ^ tJ^IOilu/t TfA7. 4i 7sy/Cf dUhU Qa-A-z J)AV/7) C'pLANA P.muttn IS <?6'43 V,a/Z\liU M-f P , 7./Ip' Wi77>%u7 /3b "hnAHiL ‘1 •+ hunt] «Uiut-i’ JJ 77 'I'H/nAituyj) RD__^________Hi f)u fii.i) 1=^: (O^c-f/f/r . y W'> 7 701// 7i !' O.J).X'2>. ../37 ! JU/2 Kt NOT 1. Hc JDtt 7la N//tr/u£iy p-/i£ J)7fN ^ICUNE-CUYn/U PU}<:.L ^lf "harm /- / kt Pt'P 01 YS' ^ ^ y/NG ‘ 'tOk' fk(- 7^6 7 CYTY ttal - PL V ///V / . 1/ '''/3/ p. T p c* / /i/ /Wi' *'a ////'^ / V c yP V r. A // 4 ; 7 fT 32 l f/- t\ 7 L /If Y At"-/■/7 'PY/n Ki'zAL 1 \lLV_.L_Ui\S .,33 . hr,/nPl C-. pTpQL ■V'VVy /,/j rTiL VI nT'YY kNiH6P>ro)N ' ‘if ■ ft <^c.. i^Kc Ni\> --VSVi •"'0 5Y __A7i/'< A/ L,C-l\6Ap.' 7.7 '' ■- --'P7//7Z' //WuTirPf A/' 7 (: \l(r M V; ( T A <51 e AIEJ) . 37 OV.CNO C FACTS RCPRESCNTCO ON THIS ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRC” RMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS nos OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TO THE BEST OF MY KNO^OSI NCE.DIVMION \ /y' V E \ /• M ROPERTY ADqf^ESS i 37 M/'T f^-'/l/Z-vV _ _/ 2 n micm£Kh/ h rn ' yy /r >y iiLfji( ”/3 , yy/ NOT 1 ^ 7A) SH(yB/N£^T>£ f ; y5^72JtJ/T AB!52(^//6)f. i(p ,„// 'h) 23^^/ dUfiU f,z 42 IS 43 15^ iB)nc 7)/3? i/r 2! 256 7 C7ikr//L. PL y '' ■5 3/ 32 u0_ ..-33 7577 I-l\HH6STi3^ 3^ '■( T A 37 HC 1233 P^ROPERTY owners list OEPARTMEMT OF FINANCE A-605 government CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 LIST Site M-rt- I CCRTIFV THAT THE FACTS RCPRESENTCO ON THIS CCNTIFICATE ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION. TO THE SCST OF MV KNOMLCOOC AND BELIEF. HENNEPIN CO. FINANCE iTlVI^ON (\ II// DATE FEE OIVNER tax payer / RILING ADDRESS S - /1 T- // ? JZ-23 /^-A^-ftOLTrl ) ■ TiAL // 77 PROPERTY ADDRESS Q^- 43 -Zajim {}/(■'/ 1(1 ‘ *>/ M/'/<, 4S /J_______/7 7£ LtfrU: /:// ^ 366 /-V a 'ic //(//-- /{ BMLMky BinlU' B'ih F. 6L?^ N * Cca/jr/ /X- /'///// S'Za r-/n Ji^z3 XAl/iX^LM J~JiuDn/M-.W%':i. /2■y/-Pt m\ ~~'.^sssss'mmAh^L-3B Y)t?ifhLt. y \5 yBp c/)<<(, pcm"Bh^^i&TrrjTy-ccmy^-fi, c. f\tl/ • •^a ^hcP ilrck/Z) f/ry W(/Bo h/h^ uviNA^m /w I jSL ma / ::>6 ~7 Z. ^ V/C/d NB) T ^c2> IQ[ 5s !0% ICC/ 22 yy /jjji^mn i). M-'c^c/czj fh\A!.Af\L ///(y )> 'sUi—-----______________________:^Xoi l-LuMiNUX.]’^70:7 ^ //4 p.yy /, 2C Z(. 57 ^jHd^^e^'DK u ^ ^UP^\prT ^eoPEEy TO;Planning Conunisslon FROM;Thomas J. Jacobs DATE;June 11, 1981 SUBJECT; #622 John C. Ericson, 1620 Shadywood Rd - Conditional Use Permit Mr. Ericson is applying for a conditional use permit to do repairs on his pagota, which is within 75' of the lake. The assessor's fair market value on this structure is $2,457. This is under what is stated in ordinance no. 31.106. 31.106. Any lawful non-conforming use of land not involving a structure, any lawful non-conforming use involving a structure with an assessor's fair market value upon the ef fective date of this zoning code of three thousand dollars (3,000) or less, may be continued for a period of thirty-six (36) months after the effective da^e this zoning code, whereupon such non-conforming use shall cease, unless brought into conformity with the zoning code. (ord. 172, 12-19-74, effective 1-1-75) Although it is under the $3,000 limit the structure is in very good shape. Mr. Ericson was attempting to repair the foundation when he was stopped by the City. Please refer to section 31.103. 31.103. Nothing in this Zoning Code shall prevent the placing of a structure in safe condition when said structure is de clared unsafe by the Building Ispector, providing the neces sary repairs shall not constitute more than 50 percent of the fair market value of such structure. Structure shall include such accessory features attached to the structure or located anywhere on the land, such as signs, marquees, monuments. (Amended Ord. 172, 12-19-74, effective 1-1-75) The work being done will not exceed 50% and section 31.108 allows normal maintenance as long as it does not extend or intensify a non-conforming use. ■ - T*. od P.d - e permit to do f the lake, ncture is $2,457. . 31.106. id not involving 2 involving a ie upon the ef- jusand dollars )d of thirty-six zoning code, t, unless brought ucture is in to repair the event the placing ructure is de- ding the neces- 0 percent of the re shall include ture or located , monuments. action 31.108 lot extend or i^CATlON OP PROPOSAL (or ijuna Use Applicati^.i • property) Address 1 ' ^ ^ ii Legal Description it applicant Name r. - flailing f** ■ I Tel #I • Address '''.j OWNER Name Mailing Address ^ ’■‘ii '• I'ii'l n; I Tel # ’yu'.n J V ;m 7 ! \ I V ' ' ‘ Present Zoning r...i^ TYPE OF APPLICATION _ _ Sketch Plan Review $50 _ Subdivision $150 + $10/Lot _ _ Conditional Use Permit t^30.00 _ _ $50.00 _ _ Rezoning $250 _ _ Vacation $100 (Minimum) FEE _ _ _ _ Date Rec'd tFf By . ny * Present Use Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request „ ®P®oify Ordinance Requirements /^Explain your request and reasons for same ,r.n:11 r*-1., ^ ^ Vi cr-' * un-^er exl^>tlrv: . ^ 1 1 ^ 1 ■ I W. ^ f VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity - - - lot Area _ _ _ Setback Front_ _ Side _ _ _ Other, explain _ _ Width Rear Specify hardships to^rop^rty'. 70> 3861 SUBDIVIfrlON^a^ppI^at ion Residential Other, explain No. of Lots V- CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail • r yrir?. MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATIC^ (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) Application completed Plat map section Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal Construction plans, if applicable Certified Property Owner's list o owners within (300*) (iSO*)- from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#1< pre-addressed to each of the name on the above list. DATE DATE Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested bv the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer. City Attorney, Planning CommissiSi and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to all fees as established by ordinance. ^ ^ 5/78 _ Rezoning $250 _ Vacation $100 (Minimum) Rec»d <f/ /7 . nu ' uii'^jr exi'-.tlnc _ Rear ^ 3 BW £1TYL0F0R0N0 * explain No. of Lots roperty in detail PLICATION 88ion meeting) Property Oiimer's list o thin (300') from Co. Dept, of Finance ernment Center legal sized envelopes (#1< ssed to each of the name ove list. equir^ or requested by By, Planning Commission 1 further agrees to pay . , uWWEffS LIST ocrartment of finance A-«05 government center ^MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 t'*T Size r)2.oNo I CeSTIFY THAT THC FACTS RCPRESCNTCO OH THIS CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT ARREARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNERIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION. TO THE REST OF MY KNOWLEOSE AND BELIEF. ---------------- PRTF- S-J'y.St FEE OWNER ■MuS mie: e n tax payer / mailing address , s/78 • ^ .. i!• ■ "Tr, lV Cl •’ . * » • % • i-iB' ■ '-• iVCCNA ■*<«"»Af •.*• ,*v.5 • • to • •^r »r'* * to V \ . 1 1 «to • • . to r •\«<a •*,or 3, lA»t 4, ani t.::a yiTuv-h S.C? W?<CD, cci:c::cip.;to the rtcc i:c»;»r.ecin Cov..'".ty, Mir.r.c Cl* ca. -► t Ir I i .,t ; r ft- »■ # to*• > r=- u '.j ^ // 7y^ I '*>K «• » ■t-"' « ' • o K ,.rt.lv irat I^'issurvev spo'-ification cr reparl was prepcied by me ' ■-i;': rJ V e-1 L'K !. cr. a'i that 1 a-n a auiv F.a; vcai<=«>.««»a»'-e<.e'«»' r; i a"-' •jr->V-'. .a-i at tt.a State .t M.r.n..,a.a. 4^/4'^Ca a AitoMSt 2X, 1976, Ke; lle._15«l-------- f.iT.JCi G. 1 i-r'‘:?r T'ti7 --‘'^-1 B 19 20 zy'za 23 ,4*^ * 1 ! gjr ■ I ‘ rtu. iWfTitf^( ti ,0 r7 . fj^p) - . f) MAPLEGATE INLET ^ '><•);‘ * J il TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth June 10, 1981 #614 David Myhre, 2590 Casco Point Road Preliminary Svibdivision Staff Update The applicant's surveyor has asked the Planning Commission to reconsider their request to move the lot line further north to allow for an increase in the depth along the required building line width cf 100'. He notes the access road and topography will determine the only building site. At the referenced building site there is approximately 115' of width. In the given lot configuration lot B maintains a 100' width for a 45' depth. Your recommendation of approval should refer to either the current survey dated April 27, 1981, or a revised plan re flecting the lot line change based on the following findings: 1) The newly created lot and the remaining homestead lot meet all the standards of the LR-IC zoning district. 2) Adequate sewer and water service for site and stubs available for hook up. and subject to the following conditions 1) Access to both lots shall be via the existing drive way - no direct access onto Casco Point Road 2) Lot A must grant an access and utilities easement in favor of Lot B. 3) Lot B is non riparian to Lake Minnetonka. City will not approve nor recognize in the future an access ease ment to the lake via Lot A or any abutting lakeshore property. 4) All new construction and improvements on the site will be limited to the hardcover allowance of 25% within the 75' - 250' setback area and 30% within the 250' - 500' setback area. 5) Before a building permit can be issued the City staff will review all proposed filling of the site along Casco Point Road for adequate sizing of culvert and approved ratio of slope. 6) Payment of Park Fee for Lot B in the amount of $440.00. property owners list OCI^ARTMENT OF FIMAMCE < V A-eoS GOVERNMENT tEjlTi^R" MINNEAPOLIS^ MN 55407^. LIST Size 360 U- Q?-C>NO I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RERRESENTEO ON THIS CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE RERRt** SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT ARREARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNERIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION. TO THE SEST OF MY RNOWLEOSE AND RELIEF. HENNERIN CO. FINANCE DIVISION 5: .DATE FEE OWNER TAX PAYER/ MAILING ADDRESS ^ J. UJQODeifl.f t • ♦ I / . * AHLM?,pr> E. it)y.S M. ^MAhjGi mN A h\A/i(^Kj ‘it* • - 0 LV\AglOA/ A ^\/AA/A t ■ ■ <k 'ItE If V' raOPaiTY A00RK5C0 :2Z)-//7'2=5 V / J . Vj • •. ir: vo;>. I vn 2^ V\U/VSC OT- Qg6^/0 k.Nt)TC J. M<3g&Aer>■ V * • * • ,• • r .1 • . _ _4 • :2. v^oDMf^y kL r/)a7M A/Afus « ' J • / % . > • , , \fLC.zy i s Netsohj lA?i ty jjHpgAui:* . . egy ^ CAeoL A>y/A/ szy S. r>6AJALD «• ' * 4 ‘ »• * 1 * • i . V « « « i , I »_ » . • • I PAot. ^ MAg]/ k>vsTa^ JOWCG A__-JUJEtn t # uJAiegous i .♦ * *l* «I 3 a / \ O' r.vsr rr. HC MCTS REPMCSCNTCO ON TNiS tN ACCUNATC AND TRUE RERRE* DRMATION At IT ARREARS TNIt )ROt OR THE NENNfRIN COUNTY I TO THE REST OF MY RNOWLEOCE ANCE DIVISION S./'/St PROPERTY AOOf^S ID Z/0-//7-2^1 ,/. V 7 1 . -Y ^ i . ‘ A 2L «( rr: r..i •// ■ + r ■ • /,-5 \ H '■\ric, vr.'M T/n If^n 1 \ • i ■zi- 1aI 1 ’,?/ 1 ,^2 3: 3L ;n / \ V ,. 4*.ws r rr. *"1 5 i i 1 : CO 2 /> X i' J \ \ \ A>. V,t: / ?• / / / !i I / / // / •« \ \ \ \ \ = ■* • / / • «s Lf; ( i-'S ~T> A \ \ r;. I y V. •t ^ < \ \ = '» / / / / /' t / / / / r \ Nj v5^ *• 5 1 « .* LAND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION EXHIBIT 1 i!!5IS«cnpNs CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 6ft. Cryiital B.iy, Mlnncs.u i S51J1 4;,1-715; tTypp or Print). u'need*d***^att«Ih'T"*Sheet. Complete Itema 1 - 13 detcrlbe your re,ueat. lnXl«f-Jpu"tr to better ppllcatlona will not be accepted. property address ^ v<r,_ . Ugal deaerlptlon shall be A**^***Vnown on attached Surve^ Exhibit 3 M-oLM applicant A/L/Ph»»ni* ^ /C** c *i c t Hailing Addreaa -----/fG<l .x >i G m,:> J ^ lA If Applicant la not owner, explain / •, It. . e ^ i Hailing Address 1 (l.jl \f'«I Date Property Acquired Hhone MV i' l^r/^ _ _ I (do) (dq_n^) also own other adjacent parcels of land AGENT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __Phone Flna Mailing Addreaa 5. NOTICES Should be sent to: X Applicant 6. «/^resent zoning use district Owner Agent 7 • i/pRESENT USE R«aldentlal (Other) _ Vacant Und _ _ _ Vacant Bulldlng(a) LIST OF EXHIBITS Ptaerlption -Initial ApDllcatip^ fMt Ineludt: 1 Application For* 2 1/^ Property Oimara Llat 3 /y£^^^rf«UsM*of Surve Fee Rscslpt * /O^ Data Recaivad ^ ^ ^ ^ »r ^ bv Staff Inforaatlon i/Plat Map Inventory 6 Staff Coaaanta ; f.Y Q£ Jf Occupied Building(a) 8. DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST astabllah naw uae — continue or expand exlatlng use w build new aa ^ ~ JS build new — add on _rasMdsl ^ rsplsss^ , ..................... -Maon _te«idsl _ rspUss Describe request In detnll: ,■............. -U. 1,^: ,1 .1,4^ ^ —tsUgf L A_________________________—_______ VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED to do the requested Work - ■ Setback (____ Front ____ Side Lot Area Lot Width Nardeopvof Rear) Other /aoo/t/ ^ 10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS preventing co«pH.nce with zoning CoI?regnlrs»nts: _________ Describe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PI5ACTICAL DIFFICULTY re.uitmg tre strict o„forc«nt of regulations fjc a< ** 12, Doscribc EFFECT OF PROPOSED „.i-kk i UbtD WORK on neighboring properties ,«i on ths neighborhood 1. gsnorsl: .ko..U bv SI.. /IV. V, I V sign and date this application. The rWNKR hereby ackncMledgea end agrees to this ayplicatirn mid further authorises reasonable entry onto the proyorty by City staff, consultants, agentOg cosailiaion naa^rtg and Council menbert for purpoacs of invaatigatlon and verification of thia request: Wii EXHIBIT 1 rif and J LIST OF EXHIBITS £ Otterlntiof^ Intttal App^^gar^iji^ Witt include: 1 Application For* 2 \/^ Property Omiert Lift 3 Survf Fm Meal pc ^ Jo Y Date Received A ^ ^ S •r Staff Informicion A 5 6 Plat Hap J^lnv«.t«ry Staff Other Inforwetlon »>«L.aj9ei 10 f 3N COST ' — •‘Mon _ra^l _ raptaw (i <jz4icrhr ^ __Ut width '••“Vh Zoning Code requlri ng from strict enfor t Of iwiti^ * ^ n^itfibertiood la geaerel: this application. Pledgee end egreee to thle epgllcetion reeeoaeble entry emto the ymyerty ante, agente, coBBiaeioa fwahare. r puryoeoe of iaveetlgetion end eqyest: . HC k33 property OWNER w list OEPARTMCNT OF FINANCE A-603 OOVCRNMCNT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55467 list aiTr I CCRTIFV THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ON THIS CERTIFICATE ARC AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION, TO TNE REST OF MV RNOWLEOCE AND BELIEF. HENNEPIN CO. FINANCE DIVISION DATE FEE OWNER C27\n~e7P \LLnaJ^IL.t. Coa/F TAX PAYER/ MAILING ADDRESS Jot-f/v p, S/'/C/^iL L Rc h/j3^M3 KaiTjCj / 4L^tf <r ^ /^fULT/ /=jloaifu&_____ i ^ ^ V^iT.C V^d- Ct^ nH Cr C4^a: H^Ar'Z/trP H/ul Kfi /0<K* C '2- 7^^- //jii t. r. PROPERTY ADDRESS ^ -2-^ -----------------------31 V/T " y/ <^- a/’ 7^^- S/!e/A^^ J/,Ll. !^a ^7. - //^ - - £>OC», o < y I r- Jlh 31981 'I ! W ORONO --'I r ' X J- rHC FACTS KEPReSENTCO ON TNIS AN ACCURATE AND TRUE RERRE- 'ORMATION AS IT ARREARS THIS OROS OF TNE NENNCRIN COUNTY I. TO TNE BEST OF MV RNOWLEOSC PROPERTY ADDRESS ID 5"-///^' -2-=5 ¥ r^' f -J/f - -z-3 -(S7> -- //g - ^-9 - //X - f/jLt. fPa. - J/f ' /i^£:Kr K JUN 31981 ! ----------- , j . ^ 1\L AUAK!/"luruj.^u I... j ■Ml 1/1^6 ^C^■ 4; c A 7^ /i TV 'rt\ -V k.\V /'% 'i \ t., ■ r. it STRUCTURES KKlBTim BVILDU9GM i Omtielmncimm» BtummAL rmt do ftot rooply with Boning porfonuinc* mtmndmrdm will ^ •ntiroly mt building or um __ r«vi«w OB not building or obo {cemt BBc«odB 5011 rnv| . FBviBw OB CXFANSICM of oxiBting feoBt Ibbb than 50ft rtfV| __ Biming building rAlli mmucet valiib (yr) ______ will not roduco on uxioting oubotondord yard dlnonBion TAXES & ASSESSMENTS MOMarr is. _____________ o^ud in coanon _ am oro not logally eonbinod for tan purpoaaa. - - - drm PAW curront aro oeuHQODfT to yoar ___________ Ammmmmmmnf Lavisidi Sowar fnol unita Hatar (no)unita Mtld ti 0 -24 rt.o% lAk«0 -75 rt.o% 1 75 -250 Pt^.2S« 1 1 250 -500 Pt.30% 500 -lOOO P^.35% age 1 Hennepin Cty. DOT Kinn. State OCT Minn. DIfH MCWD LMCD / ■ ^«Wpr'mrwwm ramrsPage 2 LAND USE PU\NNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED FINDINGS 1.1/^l>»e special conditions applying to the structure or land in queat ion are peculiar to such . iirvnedlataly surrounding property and do not apply generally to oDicr land or atructuras In « in which said land is located; Oh The conditions applying to the structure or land in question are not peculiar to auc ^ ^ a invsediately surrounding property but do apply generally to other land or structures n e which said land is located. 2. 2. “n,. 9r*ntin9 of the applicelion ^ ie____1» not f.rce.sery for the pre.ervetion end enjoyMnt 0( • substantial property right of the applicant. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair the public health* aafaty* comfort* morals or general welfare; OR 4. Ihe granting of the proposed variance may impair the public health, safety* comfort* morals or ganaral welfare. Ih. granting of the propo..d v.rl.nce will not be contrary to tha intent jf the Comprehenalye Lend Oee Rian or the Zoning Code; OR Ihe grenting of the propoaed wariarr. be contrary to the intent of the Co.prehen.lve Lend Uea Plan or the Zoning Code. S.t/ The granting of such variancv - « ^lely ••rve aa a convenience to the epplicent. but is nec.esary to alleviate deaonstrated hardsi. ;a. jT dif f Icult i-a; OR The epplicent hee deeonetreted no recogni.ed hard.hip or difficulty end therefore the grating Of *ueh variance would merely serve as a convenianca to such applicant. 6. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL i. .................. TTt /oop^ ' 0^. tTif 7^0_C6r 4. r peculiar to auch property of id or atructuiaa in tha diatrict ■uliar to auch property or r airucturaa in tha diatrict ifi raftcrvation and anjoyoant of a ftlic haalth. aafaty* comfort. fty. comfort, aorala or t jt tha Coaiprahanaiva Land Oaa f tha Comprahanaiva Land Uaa tha applicant, but ia nacaaaary thcrafora tha granting of auch /a oo ^ LAND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Ntntipsoia 55323 EXHIBIT 1 4n-7357 jjSTBUCTtOMS- fi**** •ttached Infomatlan Sheet. Complet, Item, 1 - 13 typ- or Print). If needed. ,tt,eh letter or other Information to better dccrlbe your requeat. Incomplete application, will not be accepted. PROPERTY ADDRESS //V/ f (Ir f_______ Legal daacrlptlofi ahall he ahown on attached Survey, Exhibit 3 applicant 6^a^y g, Ph..ne Hailing Addreaa )l(o^ A^Q ■ If Applicant la not owner, explain _________ OWNER "Rg.W-y)Phone ^7JL. 3k Hailing Addraa. //6 ^ ^0. ^0« W sfO4/ Date Property Acquired <£>-3t?-/^70 (Month/vear) I "^ihr) (do not) also own other adjacent parcels of land AGENT "••• JIO A6U. __Phone LIST OF EXHIBITS { Peerrlptlon Initial Application aaiat Include: Application Form Property (Vnera Certificate of Surve Fea Receipt » r.'s Received ts ^ / Irrv Firm Mailing Addreaa NOTICES Should ba aant to:Applicant Corner Agent PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT . PRESENT USE Raaldentlal (Other) Vacant Land Vacant Building(a) ✓ Plat Hap Inventory _ _ _ /y»b^e» 1 ^6 ~ StafPCo—enla^^ j;. Other Information 7 f [g(c^iguvy/i' jONf sm Occupied Bulldlng(a) 8.DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMA)TED CONSTRUCTION COST $ — aatabllah naw uaa _continue or expand axiatlng uao build naw _ add on _rawdat r.pUe. Describe request in detail; Scti/d Ag./,\ c.i^aJ'4~^ Bjcit'k.k vSAe/i^ey ’ Ao/ne Lot Width Hardcover9, VARTANCE(S) REQUIRED to do the requested Work: Setbach ( Front .Side Rear) Other 10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS prav«,tlng compllanca^iy la«ln|^ raq^.»nta^^ // /»earfA^ /a ^-r " y,. | Describe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY reauUlog froai atrUt a«fere«ant of toning regulation. v' '.' ' f' ‘ /'./ ^ ■ W. / /(T T cT l , »/yVj / -------------------------i l-'.-i------------- ^ 3.. 12. Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK on neighboring propartlaa and on tha neighborhood In gar.aral The APPLICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER mu.st The APPLICAMT hereby agreea to provide all information required or raqueatad by tha Zoning Adminlatrator, agreea tb pay all feaa and/or unuaual expensea incurred In review of this application, and ctrtifiea that the Information auppli/v/la true and correct to the beat of hla knowledge: sign and date this application. The eVKER hereby acVnowladgea and agrata to thia applicatior^ and further authoriaca raaaosMble entry onto the property by City ataff, conaultanca, agenta, coanlaaion meobara, and Council ncabera for purpoaea of inveatlgation and verlCliiatlon of thla rco^at: Applicant/s Mgnaturc Date )L-s. H/ ighature Date EXHIBIT 1 LIST OF EXHIBITS D»tcrlptl<m Initial Application aiuat Include: y y Application Foroi 7^ Propcrt7 (Wnera l.l•^ Certificate of Surve. y Fr« RiHTclpt C . 5 Received fa ^ / it iforaatlon 4 y put M«p 5 jy Inventory Other Infornatlon L C 8 ff^lTi f ^(c^|gU\v/F — jiH 'sm CITY OFORQNO TION COST $ 3g Aaa _ add on _ re«Ddal _ replace Lot H14th Hardcover lan^ radulraBtnta lulling fro* etrtet anforcawnt of lonlng /■r: f/»/V ■nd Oil the neighborhood In general te this application. linoMledgea and agreea to thla appllcatloii tea reaeoMble entry onto the property lultanta. agent a. coaMlaalon nceiierap I for purpaaea of inveatlgatlon and .a reavat: t^na ture Date . HC 1233 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST C (nONO DEPARTMENT OP FINANCE A-608 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 LIST Size \Shi- DATE OH THE HECOHOS OF THE ***'*!'*^‘" q-, joat FINANCE DIVISION, TO THE SEST OF MV KHOWLEOOE ANO BELIEF HENNEPIN CO. FINANkNCE DIVISION . jy Z/W/ svJS^ FEE OWNER TAX PAYER / MAILING ADDRESS /ik'/itK //■?£; (L '''' yftfiies 'fT //A- O AM // yy/ATA/ Kv-i hC. // ^ A // NAT f/&! /r' hT/TC Aa StoLMTit^ygp^^M^i ■-h T. kl7ijy^l 7^f N/-AI!l<.CA.ii!m- • f - ' ' V A ^ ^ /y iA—tT', /-:/jDaa 7\ Ai//• kffr A A ( 70 /: '1/»AaAa. 7) Mti ///jAaMiOy Si 'dc 1 C RC> N 0 r*CTS RePRCSEHTCO OH this kCCURRTC RMO TRUE RfRRt” UTIOH k% IT *^^**"* IS Of TMC MIHHfRiH COOHTT 0 TMI REST Of Mt RMOWtEOOE y V.S/ / 10 // 7- ^ 3 ----—r- V// jLr \//-r A //A/M<s\ *-if ’ ■«, MO "ic-ff. BK '’Anfli S. lOllMSO* COUPMItS. l»c (JcC-tri frM 401 wrOT 70TM OTItCCT OLOOMINCtON MINNESOTA B5420 PHONE Ivit* BS^ SS4I LOT AREA TITTOO Sq. Ft. (0.255 Acres) Certificate Of S urvey p^p Mg. ^ g.giTg _ Ui '.o.t •" l\•c* LOT 7 t \ \' i\ 1 <: * * * ^ % v, "‘ V-. r-CrC"-..' i‘- *..• ..Ky iVvUC. h‘.r\ -................. ^• ' JUN 51981 ('X\ '{ iiLii- f) .r’ y* I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of; Harrjf 5< Johnson, Land Surveyor! Mirinoc<>F,-s **-* I ; > -V A. - 'y V \ ir ____/'i..lic M 4*y C t‘ C obt V-* V•» csr o ’ /.m' (-<’0 Vv'jVl) ,_zc.) ;’.v..,? M . . .- ,• I L. r/'«; : .■"jr* i^ \ ' ' j . • ' 1 I _____ * ‘ ;■ ^ ^ V V. >y?r#>r; /y^?!/A ^ i {^'r/r:c* /f '^y- y ; 'i’ij ; i f^’. ■■■ J U-5> ('.;cj; • ' jr^ ’ ('///' ], ' r<^,i; , i ; . • r • .. . >- \ ^ »"V • « V V \i,' . \ \I ’H>: : > ! • ^'r* « • IL% f45^. I^ \n^-^ V : u) ;- /r<i;: ftj 1 *^\ (f7ty. m ! . /?/^ ' ; ■ ■ I •; <5 ;‘C^'Vj i , f^*i7: i = ' // •« 9 V' :v oT^03®• • I A >•» \H n>si f<S4iO>^ v?C/SI « I r* \f* V -/ — ___li^ I c;pr P. * LAND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY VARIANCES REQUIRED DENSITY WIM^HUM HtVUIKg) ACTUAL VAPI AHCT Zoning Use District rmt SICTIOW I^SUK )db JO; ISO^ So ' ^3 7*^ % So v5“<? SETBACKS WIKIKUK AllQUlAg PUST.Ul^PMOPt>f.n>VAAl AHCg r^g SCCTlPg •Idf. to ildg* V»\^%howm v«t|«ndp 75 Ft. 76 rt.. un* AREA jax. itli-------- PCAMJTTES HAAOCOVEA juJL______ nxXSTIAC haadcovlji •zIj---------HARDCOVER %iLid o - 26 rt. « ---------------------—--------- —---------- • ^ .. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- „ . .» r.. ... . (f ---------U>00_ -----£>------- ; tJkk« 250 - 500 Ft. 3016 ---------------—— — ““ t«k. soo - »000 rt. 3S* --------yr m.. t du. PAOPOSCD HXAOCOVXA TOTAL VAJOAIICZ JS s « coot ftq Jl.«93 ^4.aot 9 36^ 34.>0> M.aoa M.aoa 1, ! OTHER SECTIONS yttooiiup •wildin* ■«i9ht (»M.»--------------- ragliino ------- !n^ EXIST Pl^PAOPCSEP VAAIAWCE cwEteSZlSBL LAND DlVlSXCXii plAl ___ unplifctt«d^« lot»/p»rc«l» p«r »pj»llc«tloi» ------1_ v.c.nt occupUd _____ — ow«.r.hlp -------- -.p.r.t. o-n.».M» - ^ . „„ ownership _ _ .Ingle .ep.r.te _ _ co«a.lned with other p.rc.1. not in thl. oppUc.tlon d"oi ' l.he.hor# wotl.nd. _ _hi9h ground - - - Uv.l ground - - tolilnf hlUo TOrOCAAFIfy InciudAAf -------- l»»APf»or-----_ • i««p aIoiwa ------- op^ mtmmm %«ood*d mtmm» UflUPUPl lot phppo unusupl btiildin9 location CtOCMIwr offoetlng .ppllc.Uon.^^^^ — ^ith neighborhood development 1“*^ “** “dieting ____ city ____ county/et.te ------ privet. City em..r ------ non-e-fo^ln, ««ptic AyatA*_____ naw propoaaa --------- TAND USE gubjeet lot v^JLUU. occupiod 01ST1NC lAKO USB co^red to toning wee dle«^^ p.orOSAl. effeeto prlnclpel __accaaaory Iniildin^ or oaa conforming uao conditional uao nofi*oonfooaiiif ooO STRUCTURES i CX16T1JM OUXLDXMCS Ooficioticioai _ PAOfOSAL fYfSt do not comply with aonlng porformanco atandardo ontiroly MEM building or uaa raviow aa MCM building or «•• <coat OAcaada 50» FMV) * roviaw oa EXFAHSI09 of oxiating (coat laaa than 50% FhV) “ BAiatlng building FAIR HAMKET VALUE (jrrl ---------- %--------------- FMOFOiAL Will ^ d.ny *r»«*«uo»ev^ - - ---------------------- - will not rodueo en oeleting eubetenderd y.rd diaenelon •AXES & ASSESSMENTS PftOriMTY xo. Lota/Fareala a*^ad in TAiutSt ____ara FAID currant ara ^ .ra not logaliy comblnad for tax purpoaaa Aaaaaaaanta Laviadi II' fa^r fool ara OCLXMVEIfT to yaar taniia _____Malar (no)unlta k TO; FROM; DATE: Planning Coiwnission Jeanne A. Mabusth June 12, 1981 SUBJECT;#627 Beito and #628 Weiler - Lot area and lot width variances The applicants own larger parcels in the area but the subject lots are separated by unimproved City right of way. Both have been charged a sewer unit and each a stub available for hook up. Note the sewer easement that runs through the middle of each lot on each of the surveys. Lot 7 has not had the sewer stub designated. Access to the sites will be via the unimproved right of way. The lift station manhole is located .In the middle of the 20' right of way. If approved applicant;; will be responsible for arranging access through Heit property on either east or west side of right of way. nn access from the north through Desplinter driveway within 20' right of way may be the best approach to both sites. Remember the Desplinter application for lots 4 and 5 to the north of the subject property. The ap plicant was responsible for submitting road grading and drainage plans and to enter into a hold harmless agreement with the City for road work prior to issuance of a building permit. Both lots have hardcover problems because of the driveway lengths. The problem posed is similar to the considerations and findings made in the recent Nunnally review. ! 0>r, W| crj 0 ^ «I ln^ c <,s 8 £ X I ( t *W I i. A 8 <4 5 gc-i 2 L UND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO P.O. Bok 66, Cryttal B.iy, Hlnnosotfl 5512J 471-;i57 EXHIBIT 1 (Tjpror^lnO*** if* Coopl.t* Unit I - 13 dcaerlb* your r«qu«it"**Inc^Ur'** **if**^ other Inforraaclon to better your requeet. Inconplete eppllcetlone will not be accepted. < 'v f'l V a \ <■ i li,.-PROPERTY ADDRESS Ugal daacrlptlofi ahall ba ahown on attached Survey. Exhibit 3 applicant Naae tv !;•Phone I Heillng Addresg I ■*» •!1! . , If Applicant la no*- explain 3. OWNER V !.Phene Helling Addreei Date Property Acquired 1 . a---------^ A""''' • ^ ^ t____ (Month/Year) I (do) (do not) also own other adjacent parcels of land AGENT !*••• __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phnne Flf»____ Mailing Addrtaa 4. (Amcr5« NOTICES Should ba aane to: Applicant 6. PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT __< -: L .. I. o I 7 • PRESENT USE SaaldentUl (Other) Vacant Land ___ Agent LIST OF EXHIBITS I Peacrlptlon Initial Application ■uat include:y Application Fona Property CWnera Lift 3 Certificate of Survev Fee Receipt # /^ Date Received (o / By ^ d • Staff Infonnation * ^Plat Hap y (pXl Other Infonnation A Vacant Bnilding(a)Occupied Building(a) 8. DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ O O C-f- •' aatabllah ««. „a. _ contlnu. or ..pand aalatlng uae build nau _ add <m _ raydal _ rapUea Describe request in detail: 'X ., ir-V b A.U U-« g* ---- C -- f y / / ' i. ., ( . r-' V ' ■ t '.' ■ ■ !'.• • VARIANCE (S) REQUIRED to do the reaueaced Work: l ' Lot Area Setback ( Front Side Rear) Other 1 .11 ““X n Twr (j U ------- _ 10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS praw«,tm* coaipiianca-ith C( I^lI 11. Describe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTvXuuinJwi^atr^^ni^,toning regulationa 12, Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK on nUghborln* propercUa and on tha nalghbortiood In ganatat; v'\ V\.(; The APPLICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER must The APPLICANT hereby agreea to provide all Informatl^>n required or requested by the Zoning Adnlnlatratur, agrcch to pay all fees and/or uniiAual rxpenaes Iticiirrrd In review of thU application, and certifies that the Infoitxuir ton •uppllcd la true and curretri to the beat of hla V?H'wlt*dge. sign and date this application. The CWNER hereby acknowledges and agreea to this application and further authorlres reasonabla entry onto the property by Cltv atalf, conaultenta, egente, coeMlaslon eeedrers, and Ciujncll ruMiibera for purposca of Investigation and verlilcatlon of this request: V' I ♦ « 7 ' ^ ! V 'v Vv.i-; Applic.'inC's' Signature D;ite Oiler's Signature D^e . i : land 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LIST OF EXHIBITS i Pttcriptlon Initial Appltcaflon ■uat includa: y Application Fom Property CWnera Mat ^ Ccrtlftcaca of Sutvav \/^ Fa* Receipt # / ^7<f. Date Received I By f Inf ^! Staff Infomacion Plat Hap Inventory^ *21*!!*°*^ u Stiff Cowm/^a^ (#3^ Other Information :tion cost $ oc-r - I «e*. _ add on _ r«^t ra^Ue* « Tc-U.^ VA 6 !l^'T\ \\ ”'JW nger-” ] ________________ ill. t wtch L.Cjl4(;^..nanMn tonifit nd on tha neighborhood In gentral: :e this application. cknoa^ledgee and agreea to thla application reaamaable entry onto the property aultanta. agenta, coamlaalon lae^era, a for purpoaca of Invcatlgatlon and ta request: V nature Da\e property owners list DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-SOB GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 O do NO « CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ON THIS CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OR THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION. TO TNE BEST OF MV RNOMLEOCE AND OELICF. HENNEPIN CO. FINANCE DIVISION FEE OWNER TAX PAYER/ MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS ID S'7 rz-25 OF Mlfv^^GSdlA m Hn /-.V A'.i,23 lAM&S 'DeS'PLIA/'Tfeia.ll/ » ' n *V^v 63 iAMS Cr. (jOeiLGK-ilf., \1 U M- 3v ACV €. 't>e\TD A'U'7); i’ .i 1 A//.4 z; A- M€vT \ iijii t'A. V:Y U ( (_ L.. r. At: 1 a f U' .!l.iu< r Oi J :\Jc.2^1 r t .Ay A ^1.-“A le -MaaVC.5: iAams &. Lue>(..tjp ' •fv. AV.A//a 32 AAMS t efAllU6 UXSlLef?l\:'s A'.'i'ir A. ;i i v 31 Gr. tcifclUr-P 4^5 It I. ^irMAI?b a. 'TiP.efcN A' .<- U\''. -A A _____________________ II 1 'Ay A 3 ^ st»e,jcc~ PEOPStT/ / 1 GOi*—-’.ILLUl- ORONO ^ *■ %(f:\1 -=V" X ! ^ ----- j ANIES. INC.? ff'.tr. ^ J-.r'. i *»tA*. ** 0'^^^ i 1 'Ic^ rect representation of iccording to the Minnesota. Lsion this 2nd day of nson. Land Surveyor Registration tJo. 5065 PMM, I < I I . • . * , > ‘h ^Lli .i. O11 ■ * • ^ r'li .i. O J ib / f • I Ilf* V Il-lii ( yyy I » #.Hi vi ^M • *.No vi‘ .0 i- 13? ^ t‘. —i l(T I U i ,* ^ VI ff/ ' I •X *** ^ aC*^ >A,r.f • '* .• •'•t.••11 1 -t r z •• <•o 11 O ^ * * W o :2ii1 Vli s \! W> « i «. Rl 1^, * OR:-5 1 *'• . a> - (O s' \% g -r» r* \ [^ v«/i' t 1 .4 • I / t v />r)r^.f'.N I ( 0V_^;ar . ' j..f t - ♦»iR"i scr V I I ycL>^ L;>|z it.^ ‘ i'fiigTIp) • i ------- I .if j___ •« STRUCTURES do not cooply with toning pojfonttnc* tttndtrdoCXISTUM lOlLDUKSS -------- ^ _ Oaficioncioai ■ —-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IMIMSM. m*i ^ •Btlr.jy WD* buUdl»9 or o*« r«vi«« •• inv building or us« (codt «it<«od« SO% PNV) r«vi«w •• DCPAMSION of oxitting fcodt !••• than SO» PMV) ____ Exiatlng boiiaing FAIR MAAXET VAM bfri _____ t___________ uill not roduco an aaiating dubdf wddrd yard dioantionrnoposAL TAXES & ASSESSMENTS MOPEAtT ID. lAta/Parcaia ownad in cotwon _____ *ra _____ tra not lagally ^AJUtii ara PASO currant . — •»• DELUiouOfT to yaar • inad for tax purpotaa. ^aasaaantt Laviadi Sawar (noi unita (no)unita CITY OF ORONO land use planning ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY EXHIBIT 5 ^ vS2 tt i cir* i OR:-£ s .CO mmFi 7 r.^. an.•sr.■>^Uvy7 ^«8L/ r%N I I 2i mSm vtS *ensity HIN)MUW KgfJUIkrn ACTUAL VARIA>«CC J-*/6 3 2>^ OtfO :1L 4^ ETBACKS wiKiKUw mrouiRP ptiSTiwc _PROPOSED VARIANCE root sccTioB i^Vvahor# •€tlAI«d« HARDCOVER 7S n. 76 Ft.. LOT AXCA NAT^ ».f . PCRHITTES HARDCOVEII R.f. CXISTLNC KARDCOVEJI _______ PROPOSED HAAIXTOVIJI JS •rl.______ TOTAL VXRXAJt< * R.r.___coot StCTJ ji.tn «tid 26 rt. « ________________ 76 Pt. cnc 3 25* 7 64.202 /3 ^ f S 6 64.202 64.202 LRk« 260 - 600 FL. 64.202 • 600 - 1000 Ft. 36% •Ik -6w4wUl "C: OTHER SECTIONS pgQoiRXp Ruildino Bright |m«. ) --------------- PRCkiAg iHifi.l ■ ■ ------- EXISTINC PROPOSED variance CODE SECTIClt LAND OlVUlOMi V^iplat,_ _ _ _ _ ELS __ wnplattad^ O loia/parccla par application AVAlLARtLlTYi adjacanl lota/parcaia !• I vacant_ _ _occupSad _ _ _ aai>« ownarahip aaparatn owf%«ra1ilp January rOPOCRAPHir includaai l/ atonp Rlopaa CEOCRAPIfy affacting appli^tiont ___ lot aiaa/ahapat jig^conaiatant ACCEM i ____ nR^ ____ aaiating ^975 (Vncrihlp ^^^Intle acparatc lakaahoro _ _ _watlanda high ground opan araaaI 1/^%<oodad arai unuaual lot ahapa cofi4>incd with other parcels not in thia application _ _ _ level ground _ _ _ rolling hilla unuaual building location inconsiatant with neighborhood develofsaant ____ kiT ____ county/atato ____ private — j^Ja<a4li oriLlTlESs City aewur available connactadi City water _ _ _ available _ _ _ connected septic aystcHi _ new propoaed __ existing conform!^ _ _ _ exiating aubstandard __ exlating non-conCoroing land use Subject lot ia jj(c Lijfy -d-M-6 A«UP Subject lot ia ^ vacant occupied OC1STXN6 LAilD USE cospared to toning uae districti confomlng proposal affecta i^^prlncioal _____ accessory building cr use use conditional uae non-oon f o a ing STRUCTURES mSTUKS B0SL01NG6 oo — Deficlencleai ,---------------------------- mOKXSM. nff*l w/^ .mlr.ly HW butldlA9 do not comply with coning parfonssnce standards or uae _ review as n6f building or uaa (coat axcaada 60% FNV) _ review as nPANSlGM of exlating Ccnat leas than 60% FNV) * Exiating building FAIR MARKET VALOB fyg| _____ |________ PROPOSAL will will not reduce en exiating auBataodard yard dloanalon TAXES & ASSESSMENTS PBOPtm to. led Inlota/Psrcela *4JUUi ____ ere PAID current ere legelly CoRdbined for tax purposes. Levledi Sewer (no) ere OBLXNQOarr to yeec unite unite J TO:Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Nabusth DATE:June 12, 1981 SUBJECT: #627 Beito and #628 Weiler width variances - Lot area and lot The applicants own larger parcels in the area but the subject lots are separated by unimproved City right of way. Both have been charged a sewer unit and each a stub available for hook up. Note the sewer easement that runs through the middle of each lot on each of the surveys. Lot 7 has not had the sewer stub designated. Access to the sites will bo via the unimproved right of way. The lift station manhole is located in the middle of the 20' right of way. If approved applicants will be responsible for arranging access through Heit property on either east or west side of right of way. An access from the north through Desplinter driveway within 20' right of way may be the best approacn to both sites. Remember the Desplinter application for lots 4 and 5 to the north of the subject property. The ap plicant was responsible for submitting road grading and drainage plans and to enter into a hold harmless agreement with the City for road work prior to issuance of a building permit. Both lots have hardcover problems because of the driveway lengths. The problem posed is similar to the considerations and findings made in the recent Nunnally review. TO;Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE;June 11, 1981 SUBJECT; #594 Bruce Dayton, 550 Long Lake Rd Final Subdivision The applicant has to complete the following items before staff can schedule the subdivision for Council's review and approval. 1) Private road name a) Payment for street sign of $75.00 if applicant decides the City is to order standard sign. b) Payment of $75.00 for requires stop sign. 2) Payment of the following additional fees a) Park dedication fee of $1,200.00 - $200.00 per each lot. b) Legal review and filing fees in the amount of $50.00. The enclosed resolution is submitted for your review. Staff recommends final approval of the Wakefield Farms Second Addition subject to the findings and conditions setforth in the resolution. RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF WAKEFIELD FARMS SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe develop ment of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision plat by Dale K. Warner and Ann C. Warner, the subdividers, and; WHEREAS, the subdivision has been approved as meeting all septic standards and the standards of the RR-lB zoning dis trict finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be located without the need of any setback variances; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including; 1) 2) 4) 5) Dedication on the plat of drainage and utilities easements. Creation of a section of private road shown on the plat as Outlet C together with the remainder of the private road designated as Outlet B, Wakefield Farms, to be known henceforth as street name. Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the subdivider has dedicated to the City a Road and Utilities Easement (Exhibit A) granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said Out lot; the subdivider has created non-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements (Exhibit B) over said Outlet in favor of all abutting and/or benefiting lots including a declaration of certain maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting and/or benefiting lot owners covenants and agrees to permanently maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private road. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $1,200.00. Payment ot the City for legal review and filing fees is the amount of $50.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Wakefield Farms Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the follow ing conditions: »•# RESOLUTION NO. 1) The City has required the upgrading of the access meeting all current private road standards for a pia of eight residential lots, any future resubdivision of Outlots A and B, Wakefield Farms Second Addition or OutlotC, Wakefield Farms, may require the paving of the existing road in addition to an extension or re location of said road. w • ^ +.av2) Outlot D and Outlot E shall be legally combined foi tax purposes with Lot 2, Block 1, Wakefield Farms, which together shall be thereafter considered as one building site. __ . ^ ^ 3) All conditions of Resolution No. 1229^ original plat of Wakefield Farms which applied to the property Lw redivided as Wakefield Farms Second Addition shall continue in effect including the recorded flowage and conservation easement over the wetlands Outlot A, Outlot D, Outlot E and Lot 6, Block 1, Wakefield Farms Second Addition. ^ 4) The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed copies of Exhibits A and B as noted above. Adopted by the Orono City Council this 19 . day of William B. Van Nest, Mayor ATTEST: Alberta"Strom, City Clerk 1 i; t» TO; FROM: Planning Commission Jeanne A, Mubusth DATE:June 10, 1981 SUBJECT;#603 Richard Raiche, 2901 Watertown Road Final Subdivision The following must be ‘^9"'?^®^?ouncil' s review and final Meadows can be scheduled for Council s review an approval: 1. Title opinion addressed to the City. 2. Payment of fee. in the amount of $750.00. a. Park fee of $600.00 (each lot 0 $200.00) b. Stop sign fee (1 sign o $75.00) Legal review and filing fee in the amount of $75.00 3. construction of new road and final approval by City Engineer, 4. complete removal of old plat road and renuired seeding of disturbed area. The enclosed resolution is submitted for your review Staff will recommend ^JP^SLlc? l«olution at the ns^fabove are completed by the applicant. M** Kf ”1 ^ . I ' Il C5ity of ORONO f. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ORONO A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF ROLLING MEADOWS wHPRPAS The Citv of Orono is s inunicipsX corporstion or,«nized SidL the laws of the State of Minnesota, and WHEREAS, the City council of the City of °5°"°has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe develop of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision plat by Richard Raiche, the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been approved fiidina septic standards and the standards of the RR-IB Zoning that each lot is of a size and configuration that will as a single family residence to be located without the need o setback variances; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including; 1.Dedication on the plat .of drainage and utilities easements. 2. Creation of a new private road shown on the plat as Outlet A. 3. Subdivider has created non-exclusive ^ • ' favor ^ tots aec « ion maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said orivate road. 4.Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $600.00. 5.Payment to the City for legal review and filing fees in the amount of $75.00. Page 1 of 2 - - -*■ '-fI City of OjR-QNO CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.______________ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the 1.Future owners or Lots 1, 2 and 3,respect the tested drainfield sites selecting house locLions, for the relocation of drainfields is t^ery unlikely because of the high water table. 2.The aforesaid plat shall be ^°ther"° with riertified original cooy of this Resolution and executed copies of Exhibits A and B as noted above. Adopted by the Orono City Council this day of wTTIi2?''t- ‘jest, Mayor ATTEST: Alberta Strom, City Clerk Page 2 of 2 I m- U •.<'.■•'•' V-*# V ’.vr' >, ^ ' i*j rn ••’■: ^:’ rolling i1EA>D0WS COROON n. cof^ w. INC. rNUimt • » LOMS LAHt • mii«€SOTA .CANNES ARt AS1.VCO ^tmaU • •”“** J-' . * i.V • ‘- •' ;■•■ '■ ♦ 'f r • %m <•* / \ — v.r.« i»- »-« ^ ♦ i j I c ^ •- . ^'. -'"a H • - : • ■ “t * \«# ' '.. * ik ’ L- *• ii ^ • ■• ■■. kn: vl.i 5.*- • ; V ' M ■#> i $ i TO: FROM; Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: SUBJECT June 12, 1981 #616 Park/iew Treatment Center, 2280 Wayzata Blvd - Conditional Use Permit List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 - Zoning Administrator's memo to staff + consultants 2 - Neighbor's petition 3 - Gaffron Memo - Planner's memo 5 - Kilbo memo 6 - Glenn Cook - City Engineer's memo 7 - CMP - 7-16 Summary of Additional Staff comments and follow up comments Follow up - Kilbo memo 6-4-81 In response to Kilbo's concern for the increase of traffic t intersection of Highway 12 and Willow Drive, I asked for an accident record of the subject area for the past 2 years Personal Injury Property Damage 1980 - 3 1981 - 3 1980 - 4 1981 - 0 John Gerhardson - reports that Willow Drive is limited by a 5 ton capacity. Bruce Malkerson - attorney would prefer addressing specific legal questions that we may have in assisting you in your JTG V16 W • Follow up comments with Planner In this design, you would alleviate the traffic tie up at Willow intersection and place the "commercial" access to the minf safer location further east. Note the align ment with Tamarack and Brimhall roads on south side of Highway r ■rY* ' p\ *1 ! tL/%. TO:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Septic System Inspector DATE: SUBJECT: June 1, 1981 #616 Parkview Center, Inc., 2280 Wayzata Blvd. Conditional Use Permit - Septic System Use Review This is in reference to your memo of May 26, 1981. The proposed treatment center would have essentially the same impact as a 10-home residential subdivision in terms of total water use/waste treatment reauirements. Treatment Center Assuming: Maximum of 42 residents 1 staff person per 3 residents for 2 8 hour shifts/day 1 staff person per 10 residents for 1 8 hour shift/day % visitor per day per resident Minnesota PCA water use data - Nursing Home: Average 93 GPD per resident 10 GPD per employee (Assume) 5 GPD Per visitor Then: 42 residents x 93 GPD V3 X 42 residents x 2 shifts 1/10 X 42 residents x 1 shift »S X 42 X 5 GPD Projected Water Use Treatment Center X X 10 10 GPD GPD 3906 GPD 280 GPD 42 GPD 105 GPD 4333 GPD Ten Residences Assuming: 150 GPD/Bedroom (Standard Design Criteria) 5-3 Bedroom Homes, 5-4 Bedroom Homes [(5x3) + (5x4)) X 150 GPD » 5250 GPD residential projected water use The treatment center, while having a somewhat lower projected water use, would be concentrating all of the waste treatment in a relatively small area as opposed to 10 separate smaller waste treatment systems scattered over 20 - plus acres. The best soils on the parcel for waste treatment do occur near the proposed treatment center buildings, which might allow for a standard drainfield system rather than the sewage treat ment mounds which would likely be required for individual homes due to slowly permeable soils and high water tables on the site. With proper soil testing and system design, neither proposal (treatment center vs 10 homes) would pose a significant pol** lution hazard over the other, in my opinion. -i 9 $I . ‘ II y % i • • ^ • # // TO:Jeanne A. Mabusth FOR:Planning Commission and Council FROM:Alan P. Olson DATE:June 9, 1981 SUBJECT:#615 Ringer Subdivision #616 Parkview Treatment Center, Purposes This memo is in response to your request of May 26, 1981 re garding technical review of these proposals. Background The proposal is to subdivide 55+ acres into 2 or 3 large tracts, one of which (size 28 acres) may be used for a chemical depen dency treatment center having a maximum projected size of 42 beds. Staffing would be 1 per 3 patients for 2 shifts and 1 per 10 patients overnight. Other considerations include visitors and deliverymen. The alternative is platting of the 28 acres for residential home- sites. Because of soil and watertable problems, Mr. Gaffron ad vises that the maximum residential division would likely be 10 homes. The subject is comparison of these two possible developments. Basic Land Use The land is zoned for residential developments as a permitted use. The Council has determined that the Parkview proposal does qualify for review as a Conditional Use in this district per 34.823. Planning Commission and Council should recall that to deny a Conditional Use Permit, vary detailed findings have to made that the proposal is directly and demonstrably adverse to the public health and safety. The record must contain facts to support such a finding. Use Density Parkview currently proposes an ultimate main structure of about 12.000 square feet. An existing 3,000 sq.ft, barn is likely to remain. Also possible are scattered out buildings for ser- ivce purposes. Parking would probably oe for 25-30 cars totaling 10.000 sq ft. Therefore, it should be assumed that there would be 25,000 - 30,000 sq ft of hardcover, plus driveways. Assume 1 acre total of 28 » 3.5% hardcover. A typical rural Orono home might include the house (3000 sq ft), an outbuilding (1000 sq ft) and driveways for about 10,000 sq ft out of 2 acres • 11.5% hardcover. J % ■ A' -S •' \ I ^ 1 •i -i •4 I #615 Ringer Subdivision #616 Parkview Treatment Center Page 2 Traffic Traffic generation appears to be greater for the Parkview pro posal than for the alternative 10 residences. Common planning principles calculate residential trips per day (one way auto movements) as 8 to 12 TPD/residence or 2.7 to 3.5 TPD/person x 3.5 persons/household = 9.5 to 12 TPD/residence. Therefore, assume 10 TPD/residence = 100 TPD for 10 homes. Estimated Parkview TPD is calculated as follows: Staff: 14 per shift x 2 = 28 4 per night shift = 4 3?/day x 2 62 TPD Visitors: 1 per patient/day = 42 x 2 Patients: arrival/departure (est) = 84 TPD = 2 TPD Deliveries: food/laundry/ repairs; est 15/day = 30 TPD 180 TPD Comparison is 180 or 200 TPD Parkview vs 100 TPD residential. At 200 TPD, this is equivalent to 20+ residences. Normally this level of useage would require access on a publicly maintained street, not via a private outlot. Lake Use The Ringer property includes about 700 ft of shoreline on Dickey Lake, which is about 1/6 of the total shoreline. Seven residences plus 2 other vacant tracts also abut the shore. Zoning District lake frontage requirements are 200 ft/residence. The existing residences average 250-300 ft of shoreline each, although 2 parcels have only 50 ft each. The Ringer property if residentially developed would therefore likely have at most 3 riparian lots, each of which would be al lowed 1 dock and up to 4 boats (LMCD Lake Minnetonka spec's). Parkview lake use should this be limited to not more than the same level of useage, which could be up to 12 boats. Dickey's Lake is entirely private. There is no existing public access even though it is classified as public waters. As part of the subdivision, we should carefully consider platting of a fire lane or other limited access trail. . ! vf -....S'C!. -S. » aSamm^ai ■=r! #615 Ringer Subdivision #616 Parkview Treatment Center Page 3 Security Chief Kilbo has addressed this matter. The proposed facility is located far from existing residences. In some respects, problems with outside persons (such a burglary of the premises) should be less than the residential risk because the facility will be oc cupied and staffed 24 hours per day whereas rural residences are frequently unoccuppied. Fire Protection Parkview would be classified as a type I-l institutional occupancy. All construction must be type 1 hour fire resistive (for a 12,000 sf facility located where proposed). Fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems are required. The sprinkler is a costly item here because there is no municipal water available. A reservoir or tank will be required unless a water connection is made to the Long Lake system. Fire and emergency access should be provided by good design of the road and parking areas, which should be a condition of any approval. This level of protection is generally higher than provided in^ single family residences because the risk, particularly the life- safety risk, is more severe. It is also likely that more fire runs will be generated including false-alarm calls. Subdivision Design My personal feeling and recommendation is that the May 7, 1981 preliminary plat should not be approved as drawn. Access to the Parkview site is not well developed. There is no cul de sac on the proposed outlet. There is no indication of plans for access to or use of the front strip of land along highway 12. These issues should be finalized at the Planning Commission level before taking a revised or clarified plat to the Council. Traffic issues seem paramount. I have concluded a site analysis of possible access points shown on attached drawing #1. Consis tent with our CMP and with MnDOT criteria, direct access onto highway 12 should be strictly limited. Two excellent locations are available directly acress from existing Tamarack and Brim- hall Avenues. The existing dr/. eway location to this site has reasonable visibility but should not be upgraded at its present location because of conflicts with the opposing streets. Almost any location along Willow Drive is a good access point, except within 200-300 ft of highway 12. ZM #615 Ringer Subdivision #616 Parkview Treatment Center Page 4 The Rebers property will also be developed sometime. Considera tion must be given now to any need for interrelating access be tween the Ringer and Rebers parcels, particularly because Reber has very limited access locations available. Brown Road has 1 good and 3 fair locations dictated by sight distance on the rolling profile. Highway 12 has very poor access to the Reber land because of a hill and curve. Drawings 2-5 attached suggest some designs for alternative ac cessing to the Ringer and Rebers properties. In all cases, the suggested road location is different than on the proposed May 7, 1981, drawing. Note that all suggestions separate Park- view (and Ringer lab?) traffic from residential traffic, which is not done on the existing proposal except by unacceptable mul tiple direct access onto highway 12. Future Changes The proposed Parkview facilities are all clustered in one area of the 28 acres site. Future economic or social changes may affect long term operation of the facility as proposed. If the 28 acres site remains zoned RR—IB residential, the poten tial remians for future subdivision into 2 acre lots, either of all or a portion of the site. Even with open space easements, there may be future pressure to subdivide off several lots while retaining this principle use, or at the time this use might be converted into something else. One cannot foresee every possibility. However, permanent cisions such as platting approvals and road locations must take into account these concerns, and must allow flexibility to meet unseen future changes. My professional recommendation is to revise this proposed sub division as follow^: Reguire a road system that will reasonably serve all future development of the land abutting highway 12 via limited, well-located "street" accesses instead of direct curb-cuts. Consider the implications, location and design of a new public street to serve the Parkview (and other non-single family residential) uses as dictated by the high TPD traffic count. Note, public streets are often more desireable for mainten ance if looped or thru design rather than cul de sac. Consider allowing for future interconnection with roads in the Rebers property. i letime. Considera- ‘lating access be- irly because Reber Jrown Road has 1 Lstance on the rolling :he Reber land alternative ac- In all cases, on the proposed »ns separate Park- il traffic, which ^ unacceptable mul- (tered in one area :ial changes may I proposed. iential, the poten- re lots, either of 1 space easements, several lots while :his use might , permanent de cations must take exibility to meet this proposed sub serve all future 2 via limited, direct curb-cuts. ign of a new public -single family PD traffic count, ble for mainten- ul de sac. n with roads in the # >¥■ ff h I -------1 ECKSTRbM ! * r. i :• •••* • • * • •,----------- eve STATE #t / *' n^ii I I t .* If! I • s; i*.ev«V :.1 i"*L0til6 . • *« t« COUNTA t 1 • *6** m •-n' til , • i • I# t #• // t! u- . ••*1 •0, (Voji) T0I« r f 5 —: cvne I • •Mfr \<' II L i tSr V&e) m f •HWV^*-T A I ..Ik , C-r r f I V I - .WH . .1 , . • ^ m rr/? CAN'ILT rrr^ 7 Iff - —• "7771 ( i ; ' •1 ^; *2 ,,w* »r 1MM r> A ft.li . ^ ^ i • 1 At T ' F” ! » > 1 I ' I 1^1 ^ ^ I II V > 1 ^ V- ^ ' tilJ_____1*1 •• lit t* 1 • • * 1 • M \»>t ft 1 • • Si- N . • '*’"T7TT /.9E? • i* - : v>-" bfc’-.,y. • I t*‘ i 7 w :n ora *• *» *•* MJLMfihMUMnTnfj ____i i • 1 .0 ' Vf ’•• 1 •A ^ 'V V i - IW m— -■ . J>r .♦ JUNE, 1980 TRANSPORTATION G I 8. 9. j or :vewm locations an # neighborhood. j’tctsoction conflicts tor t"h^ teirregr-cr^ft If ic -J-V ■ lllTrrel irerdtr^crtc'ccss onto public highueys from separate properties-fron separeto proper-- ^pg^HSPORATION RURAL TRAILS ARE access to the Hennepin SYSTEM. Rural trails ^^eas of the City. County Park Reserve Lan ,;-^ina as well as walking Rural'trails offer encourage and bicycle Hiue-hike^trail system and completion of the p ann -yjai trails connecting theme private developpent o rural^^tr p,,p„rie.. public trail system ^itn motorized use of The City will continue nrooriate to the trail's trails within “""“.‘tncompa^Ele with adjacent basic purpose and as incump residential propertiesre;:: The planned rural land ^ ^Existing bus routes support , ^rea enroute between Long Lake, pass through the rural routes are sufficient Sayrata and “d will in fact provide to serve Orono s rural n „ped for additional additional rural service ocations are urban service J®desiring to use transit rerri-sVitl'-e the established park and ride locations in Navarre and Wayzata. CMP 7-13 » 1 M-jninu’Hi «*1 ri;Iti"i 1 rill wp* 'It<III' >n P>i 111* _ Si P.iul. Miniu*>‘*''' r>"l"“ • •• . .(612}296zl607 • • Charles Weaver Chairman Metropolitan Council Suite 300 - Metro Square Building Seventh and Robert Streets St. P?"l. Minnesota 55101 -c/". • -• In reply refer to: 702 . Revie^^ of Local Copprehensive Plan For the City of Orono ,Metropolitan Council Referral File tO.8569-1 Dear Mr. Weaver:• ii, • • Th. Minnesota De,ar»^c result of tl.t eval^ttcn: • 1 ^ rtr\a Cicb aiiu • - - - - ^ A M stated on page 1-2. the ba=ic plan g^l policv to protect the general facilities will be provided and mpr^d ^ 9 bn page 2-3 states that Q_ities. Planning oolicy 2 on page 2-S consistent with area i^de incentives and protection of the public tnt«est“ a^fart of *?tack^ro-and policies v*ich relate to transportattcn facilities either directly or indirectly.facilities eicnet uj.i.cv.t.a./ -- - - - - • i j The traosportati^ plan atarts^^e 7-^ S!.'“in^rp!n grty"r?a3iS^=ver n»»r«>s roadways within the Orono »- riicipal corporate limits. Page 7-5 of the transportation ‘^°’^The^rain theroe of Orono's transportation plans for upgrading T.H. 12 w^thm taf.p Minnetonka. The plan does not ad- plar. is to direct arterial «necifically where the diversion impac^ are dress how many trips can be or “ould impact T.H. 12 as mentioned going to take place. It seems t^ y-19 JStiSis somTof the problems in Rural,Policy 2 on page chf Burlington Northern Railroad tra* prox- ciated with access W T.H. 12 for the Orono transporation plan to taining^the T.H. 12 operating integrity and safety. ■KM (- January 21, 1981 Charles Weaver Page TVio UcbllLfiSlifiSL^J^cognizes tlie unpact of driveway locations and as it applies to traffic safety and rural policy covers the local road situation. Mn/DOT Dis trict 5 has conducted studies which show that the number of accidents per mile increases as the nunber of access powts per mile increases, thus, Mi/DOT's prime concern is t) maintain the T.H. 12 traffic safety in conjunction with the preservation theme. Orono can augment this throughtheplattingprocessb^jrgvijJjflt.gg££g£r^^g^ljjga2.cir^ l3tiOT,_ggX£enisadjac«if^^T^nTrS?^ia^nn^atrans^rtation plan policy directed to- waros preserving the only intermediate Arterial's function. Uhile the City of Orono mentions some transit aspects, it doesn't mention the Minnesota Rideshare Program probably because of its newness. The Rideshare Program can be of ben efit to Orono resiaents in terms of car-pooling and van-pooling and perhaps providing additional park and ride sices will enhance the program. The Department requests that the results of this referral including disposicicn of com ments received, be forv-arded to my office for inclusion in our files. Sincerely, Fred P. Tar.2er ' Regional Transportation Planning Coordinator '■ - nJ > . V • *; • ■• . . ‘ • 1 . V 1 . •• k ' - - t\w ■• .v;i' «« i»* . - n yM m I EX:^?3IT <r f - f i id DATE:June U, 1981 TO:Jeanne Mabusth FROM:Mel Kllbo SUBJECT:#616 Parkview Center Permit I have reviewed your memo. I contacted St, Louis Park Police Department, They indicated their facility handles adults only. They occassionally receive calls for assistance with.unruly visitors. The police stated the facility is in a isolated area, so they have no traffic problem. Police stated their Parkview facility has enough staff to handle all situations. The police do not feel Parkview is any significant problem to them. I am concerned at the young age level of patients, in respect to the runa%#ay problem that might put more load on the department. I am also concerned with the add itional traffic this facility will put on an already busy #12 & Willow crossing. ...> ."lav - I k. ' r I f ’TV* «■ •itw ^ r f • • y\r.i r*f'T .^i • &o*t«4Uoa, HaiSH0, And^fUik S /Jui»e4ai»4. Jhc, CmaimmtU 2335 at/. 7-a M St P^. 55ft3 Pktm» 6/3.636 *600 t*lla C\ OftUttfoa, !».£■. MnfhH If*. Ifnteme, F.f, j. ufh i. AndffUK, rx. UttilUttd A i rmfHrg. f V. Hnfiunt f , Juftter, tJ. Jattiri C. Olit*n. June 9, 1981 (^(J956 - 25*4 - /W rersaojJt^ Chnm IT. Co9k. PS. k'ftik A. C Of Jam. PS. Tkommi f. Soyei. P.K pHk0fJ w*. FoUff. P h. Pfbrit it. Sikumikt, P.t Stmtun Ai'/itf/#. PS. tianmtd C. Putttudt. P.S. Jrtry A. Bourdon. PS. Atork A. Homon. PS Ckmrtet A f rukitm two if. Pnwthk} Hmrimn S§. OUom T>n\td I nhoH i City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 'IT •»“'** i • • • • Attn: Jeane Habusth ■ *<r*v'0 i•• 'or Re: #616 Parkview Center 2280 Wayzata Blvd. Our File #139 Dear Jeane: We have reviewed the traffic generated by the proposed Parkview Adolescent Center at 2280 Wayzata Boulevard as apposed to a 10 lot residential plat. The residential plat would generate approximately 100 vehicles per day with the traffic generally spread throughout the day. The adolescent center is estimated to generate 5 trip ends per bed and based on the 42 bed maximum would generate 210 trips per day. The adolescent center is estimated to generate about two times the traffic of a 10 lot residential plat with traffic from both uniformly distributed throughout the day. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. /C IN&blKUU /X Glenn R. Cook GRC/jo ft «. 4470a ^ , i s. f i* \ A I I I I I I f .! ;i . I I .A. • TRANSPORTATTOM JUNE, 1980 SCENIC PARKWAY Scenic parkway is a designation and classification “sed^ by the Cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul and applied by roads which traverse especially scenic and environmenta y s gni -irtu areas of the City. The scenic parkway is typically a narrow, speed road which provides access to recreational areas an spe traffic of scenic attractions. High volume through traffic and t is not appropriate on scenic parkways because these users o from the attraction and because the physical nature of the roa ^,1 conducive to efficient through traffic movement. Because o envi sensitivity, scenic parkways cannot be rebuilt into . collectors or minor arterials without adversely affecting the natural setting, the scenic quality of the road and/or the abutting landowners. Because of the natural topography o e , scenic parkways also provide some of the traffic and oca access functions of both local and collector streets. JURISDICTION: COUNTY OR CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 50-66 FEET LOCAL STREETS Local streets are public streets that sections fith collector streets are controlled by stopping the local traffic. JURISDICTION: CITY right-of-way WIDTH: 50-60 FEET DEAD-END; LENGTH WILL BE LIMITED BY PUBLIC SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS PRIVATE ROAD A private road is a privately owned and privately maintained road, located in the rural area or within a planned development, that funcLonr.s . loci .ccoss street. The City will require thet private roads be constructed and maintained to City standards. The City wil- Icqu!rr.n easement for public inqress. eqress end access to all properties but the City will allow the property owners to limit normal use road to the benefitting landowners and their invitees. Private roads ”!l be located on plaited outlots intended for joint and several ownership by all the benefitted property owners. JURISDICTION: HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION WITH UNDERLYING EASEMENT TO CITY MAXIMUM SERVICE: APPROXIMATELY TEN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 30-50 FEET DEPENDING UPON NUMBER OF USERS DEAD-END: LENGTH WILL BE LIMITED BY PUBLIC SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS 7-16 r I I I \ I i { [ I I i 1 1 % —" \KO 1 June 11, 1981 Mr. Conrad V. Schmitt President Parkview Centers, Inc. 3705 Park Center Blvd. St. Louis Park, Minn. 55416 Dear Mr. Schmitt: Per your request of May 28, 1981, requesting information for the City of Orono, I have made inquiries of our patrol personnel, detective personnel, and Sergeants, pertaining to the three (3) questions you asked. 1. In regards to problems with the treatment center, several of our officers stated that they did not know it existed. A check of our files shows no problems and I recall no negative conments. 2. Again, everything I have heard about the treatment center has been positive, and we have encountered no problems. Our detectives have had contact with Pay Myers in referring juvenile persons to him, and they have spoken very positively of their working relationship with the Minnetonka School District and the chemical dependency area. Detective Ivars Upens also expresses his positive feelings about the program and encourages its utilization by the City of Orono. He also advises that the Hennepin County Advisory Committee uses the facilities for their meetings, which has enhanced the overall picture of the program for the participants. 3. We have not had any negative feedback of the center, I apologize for the delay in this matter, and hope that this meets with your needs. I do wish you the best of luck in this endeavor, and if you have any further questions, or need further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Howard R. Orobny Chief of Police ^ Donald L. Olson Deputy Chief the city oHices m?nnetonka boulevard minnetorka, minnesota 55343 933*2511 • * J_ TO:Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE:June 11, 1981 SUBJECT: 1624 Thomas H. Rudd, 1325 Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit Mr. Rudd requests a conditional use permit to dredge wide 100' length channel to his existing 100* dock. applicant was asked if the condition arose as a result or the current water level and his response was that the con dition has existed for over five years. He contends his boat and his friends' boats have been damaged by large rock in the approach areas to his dock. The application involves the removal of not only large rocks but the removal of 2' to 3' of lake bottom, a total of 533 cubic yards. The existing dock appears to have approximately 3»i of depth. The applicant seeks a 5h depth. The DNR ap plication contends the channel will be 160' in length and 40' wide. Applicant must clarify. The method of dredging will be via of 3/4 yd clam bucket on barge. The M.C.W.D. has asked for a survey designating dock loc ation and channel area to be dredged. The City will re ceive a copy when completed. Normally, the City would not ask for a survey until the conditional use permit is approved by Council. Planning Commission may consider recommending that the large rocks in the approaching channels be removed and that the lake bottom remain undisturbed since there is a 3*5' depth at dock. B Drive - dredge a 30' dock. The a result of that the con- ontends his , by large rock >nly large rocks 1 total of 533 ive approximately . The DNR ap- Ln length and clam bucket ing dock loc- ity will re city would not ermit is approved ig that the •emoved and that »re is a 3>s' CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Land Use Application t I^ATION OF PROPOSAL (or property) fig, UOAyrrLTO. , i-or&Ta) VW 5C.C.. (5 ’/l ) i^gai Description (iiH Raio«s.F; Caa \ applicant Name"TTfoAkK: U. Tel #VkiR Mailing Address 1^3;^ (iVi.v?r^~na V. DWNER Name Mailing Address fi^vx ji fL.^ n Tol Present Zoning " /A? TYPE OF APPLICATION Sketch Plan Review $50 Subdivision $150 + $10/Lot Con(ijitional Use Permit $30.00 J^50.00 Rozoning $250 Vacation $100 (Minimum) FEE f -^9 Date Rec' d /> — /•" ^ /- By Present Use L/^ning Ordinance Section Relating to Request A '''Specify Ordinance Requirements OT V [plain your request and reasons for same Aap TO (?^cxa.T Tc\ iv>v (iJiTW OLTf paju,QAgi^ 't'UgL PCoP^ ^Ot^t 7* Aix*jc/t ‘pr.■Ar^(Jg:^ r ^ QncAH' PLoluj^. variance required - extent of nonconformity _ _’Lot^^i^ea _ _ _ Setback Front_ _ _ _ Width Other, explain _ Side Rear Specify hardships to property- SUEDIVISION application Residential Other^ explain^ No. of Lots lONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of ij JUN 4198! 1 (-nv np OROMu MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting)3t<»a-Ao® SYt-sofi *• 1. Application completed '5. Certified Property Omer's list r. *" 2. Plat map section --3. Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of < proposal 6. 4. Construction plans, if applicable owners within (300*) (180*)- from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center Stamped, legal sized envelopes(#1 pre-addressed to each of the name on the above list. DATE DATE Applicant's Signature CX^/nor's Signature ' y/' Applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all fees as established by ordinance. 5/78 TYPE OF APPLICATION Sketch Plan Review $50 Subdivision $150 + $10/Lot Cone;.itional Use Permit $30.00 )y$50.00 Rezoning $250 Vacation $100 (Minimum) te Rec * d ^ \ . d . !/y\ MP. TO •t'Uf. Pgf>P^ Qjat. Rear ■ B 4' 51:^ ex pl No. of Lots I'T iAi JUT' IT98T t ■ <■ ..i (Miv np OROMII APPLICATION mission meeting) svt-soff sve-sa'ir ed Property Owner's list n within (300') from n Co. Dept, of Finance overnment Center , legal sized envelopes |#1 ressed to each of the name above list. 7 r€ ^« , "V,/x/y required or requested by rncy. Planning Commission and further agrees to pay »1C 1233 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST OC^RTMCNT OP FINANCE A-005 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS^ MN 55487 LIST SIZE I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ON THIS CERTIFICATE ARE AH ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION. TO TNE BEST OF MY RNOVLEOCE AND SELIEF. HENNEPIN CO. FINANCE DIVISION n*Tr "^7-^ • FEE OWNER TAX PAYER/ MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS ID c^-2. - // r- • C^?!^ -Juc/n* Lu J /T /<*>«-// U.'f'//yirp,4e^ /w7<' Srxnx (J/9C.*C Cl ///<T- 5'r. it, //^/^* ^2' //7- J. TT¥A/C>c>o O. lP//\yre/Z3 ^5e>/: ''7J/a?r'y73 M i>t> j, £P C^fAOV /^o-}r- * ^ ■ r7 /^/y y 4 u.yivz^ £p/2£^^Lj>9 D£>U&//3^<9 w ' j P ^ s ♦ ^y / v^-V*’" • * • •''* •/ , • /... .,;f *• •* 1 • ■ w'J 4 "■'M \‘ Ur I fACTS RCPRESCNTCO ON TNIS ACCURATE AND TRUE RERRC- NATION At IT AMEARO TNIt Ot or THE NENNERIN COUNTY rO THE REST OE NY RNOWLEOCE ICE DIVISION ROPD^TY ADDRESS ID // r- • C'^ 2> /w' ^r-.^o/S CfV3/ //7- 7-3 -C3^ C»e>c<. ^»>/: cTo y. % r. S^<ar^^A^ >ar ^zsg> C»e9.' Jj^naz T^ ----------------y' t \-> .> .• ' i f• ••• , ■■•V/' ■ V. 4 • -. ■ ‘?r V' s > •** ^to ■ivJit ui'y*- EJvV*^ V«i- ' « \ / il\, So S V' ; m iU i;'- j\ • A' 3X i "•\ SJ v X- »-S\ « \ V\S «j>v^ s•n <i\V\"> -t'. / 51 55«:1^; c: \ // '1 ^-1 . ^1 ’TTyi A#M1 m g T ’T^fs.•A •# 1 a !«••£ •y[j ?j»4 W <•L— ^ • il J eb /' I H«V9 N V :zT'S' m jj •n <p - / -O - A 2 -It- \ : n Jr I ♦ *”’* tMip JO auM 4*«f^ «oidilv I * • V r * - • ./ • ' \ ^------^;r" NA-02670-01 (W-221)‘ (Rev 74)STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPAR1HENT of NATURAL RESOURCES NOTIFICATION OF PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT Minnesota Statutes, Section IOS.44, Subdivision 1, requires you •* supply a complete copy and all supporting data of your water permit application to the following: A) The chief executive officer of the city or township within which the project is located. B) The secretary of the Board of Managers of the watershed district, if any, within which your project is located or which your project may affect. You MUST certify having served the complete application on the above in the box on the back side of the application form W-S4. IN ADDITION, if your project is NOT located in a city, a complete copy and all supporting data of the application should be submitted to the Administrator of the Shoreland Manage ment Program for the affected county. Complete this form for each notice served on a local government official. SECTION 1 (TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAST) TO: A) Chief executive officer of the (ohadk) Q city, CD township of OrOMO (print or type none) B) Secretary of the board of managers of theMlmmehmhm Creek watershed district. (print or type none) C) Administrator of the shoreland management program of Heyteplm nr* :(print or type name) county. I FROM: Thoama H. Rudd 1325 Shoreline Dr, Wmygmt* (print OP type nam and addreea of applioant) Date: May S. 1381 l.NSTRUCTIONS FOR THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT This report from provides you an opportunity to submit input to the Department of Natural Resources to assist in deciding whether to grant, modify, or deny the requested permit. It is NOT absolutely necessary for local agencies to officially approve or disapprove the project or make any recommendation, although this may be done if desired. It is requested that local agencies indicate the following, as applicable: A. B. The relationship of the proposed project to local plans for the affected water and related land. The relati onship of the project to local land use MnU'ilt inrludin^ - flood plain and/or shoreland regulations. > ^ ^ f] v//! f j' • , (oontinusd on revwB* aida).N 41981 C. Any possible effects of the proposed project navigation, fish and wildlife, conservation, pollution, an D. ISrr«oS:i!.L';‘.SIfrc;.io„s i.. .he ,.0^0,.! or o.her .l«e-‘‘vo way of achieving the desired objective which would reduce undesirable E. Any pertinent factual data available concerning the water body or the proposed project. F. Reasons for any local objections. Please complete this form and return to the address shown in this page within 15 days, if possible, or inform the department if additional time needed. NA-02670-01 (V.-221) (Rev 74) SECTION 11 (TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY, TOWSHIP, WATERSHED DISTRICT JR s,0U^^Y) The applicant named on the opposite side of this form submitted a copy of his water permit application on It has been reviewed and the following comments are submitted for consideration by the Department of Natural Resources (Attach additional Bhaato xf necBBBax^) return TO; department of natural resources Division of Waters Building Pmiir«»i tnff M£r:.o r .:. ■ .-.r.iif. Dated Gov't Official's name (print or type) Signature Title Address . I N;\-o:62:-oi ^W-54) STm Of^ISNkSOU........ ntFAKlMtST tifjKXUMl RLSOURLtb APPI K ATION KOR FERMIT O **ORk IN PUBLIC KATERS , the owner of UnJ m <'*ivernmont loU*)-----i. ThOMs H. Rudd____--------------------------------- ’ Tprint or type oppIToont fl •ume 3* .t.onlO 2 . town.htp no.(s) „1?I ------• -------------quarter scction(s)__■ . scctionl---------------- 4 1C ft 1325 ShoMliM HtwMplm-----... ,ir.ru. t. herewith inJ made a part hereof. PROPOSAL m rouw»i»j g pialiffi. .«... ..TO s^uis.^hrs:.?\f too docic safely without daaaga to props or ssrsral frlsads£s^:.sri:;.“is5tJLJ5v;^t":.i or «..l* »»»>••* • • LN\ UO-^^* AL IMPACT 1. Anticipated changes in water and re»awcd Uni nn ±f% 100 fX S«>OTol Of two to thro. ft. of lok. totton up to 100 ft. i» J.o»«™ sad thirty ft. ia width. ;. ..„avoiJ.ble but antic.pe.ed detrimental effcots: aoas I t. altrrr.anves to the action propoteJ: A largo oztsasioa to ay oxistiag dock i PROJECT SITL DATA ,. OoscMh. the tn.e and a^unt of aquatic .. . rook bottoa. ; Describe the nature of the -terial beneath the water. Saad, rooks ft olay 5. Describe the nature of the upland area: oaly aaadp clay ft 4. Oescrib. t^e and ««unt of nearby ahoreUnd development: Rssldaatial s EHCUISE SKETCH DESCRIBING WATER LEVEL FLOCTUATIONj. feee in,truction,) aiial juti 41981 ..rfr OF ORCKiO attach FrTRA SHEEIS U NECESSARY ( Nrt •»?6.:2-01 (W-.S4) COWSTRUCTIOW 0*TA (al0o .itUu'H •Imtofc or Jrtmn’y/) (Rrv 74) Ch«nn»Mini Existing Proposea »lfr.inoni nlong sh«»i«» Pr.'posi*.! Total Inngth (f00t).....................-_________ 160 fto a 4l.*ng * Length in lakt/slrtea - ■ *QQ Bottoa Miath iS*0t). . . . . . .. . . . . 40 Distance ••tervnra (feet). . . . . . . .. . . . . Side slopes (ratio) -------- - - - - —~ Thickness of fill •aterial (feat)- - -_ _ _ _ _ Average depth f/eet^- - - - - - * 5# Gradient f%)^ - -- -- -- -- - Oepih of eacavatlOfi (f€»^t) - - - • - - 1. ^scribe type of excavation equipaent to be used* if knoim; 3/4 yd. olam bucket om barge 2. Describe location (inelud* map) ana characteristics of spoil aispostl site proposea: See attached letter 3. Mould maintenance excavation be necessary? (ohtak) l / YES C—/ NO Explain; PoeSlbly 4. Voluav of Mterlal to be reeoved initially (cubic jorda): >Aick or silt Sand or gravel ^^3_______ Rock or stone ^ fgy ATTACHMENTS JC7 115.00 filing fee, photographs, other (apacify )B&B PftPII Applicant declares that infon^tion submitted herewith and stateeents made herein are a true and correct representation of the facts, and that the filing of this application and information with the Commissioner of Natural Resources is prima facie evidence of the correctness thereof. COMPLETE APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO: Orono Boxx 66 Crystal Bay Sam of city or to^aHip street a poat offica Mi—haha Creak Sam of lyjtarahad diatriat (3) Shoreland Management Administrator of H—apia ______ county Dated this _9 ______ d*/ MXy 19^ ilaaaaa) Address 132$ Shortlixt Dr# City Waygmta,. state Mian. State of Minnesota Haaaapia ) ss.AFFIDAVIT Zip code 55391 475-2919 County of on this 9 day of 0^ ^ priors me personnelly appeared Thomas H. Rudd who being first duly sworn and to me known to be the person application, acknowledge(s) that 1|# executed the sami who executed the foregoing own free act and deed and that the statements, maps, plans, documents, and other supporting data are true and correct according his best knowledge and belief. JUDITH t NiCCUm \ ■ j V^rZ -Ol / / N^hry Public pi«County hotary , , ^ MKNNaPlN COUI^ My commission eapiies 4 i TO:Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE:June 11, 1981 SUBJECT:#625 Roger Veon, 1330 Sixth Ave. North Conditional Use Permit Zoning District - RR-lB Application - "After the fact" conditional use permit Area - 2.6 acres 6840 sf of pond area Mr. Veon has excavated a wetland or drainage area of ap proximately 30' X 288' to create a wildlife ponding area. The subject area is located in a centralized collector point of an extensive network of an agricultural drainage tile system coming in from the north east and north west. Through the years of use the tiles were broken and now drain out over the land causing a waterfall Sheean property to the south. The Veon property in the area of the spill out was continuously wet and mucky. Please re view applicant's comments enclosed in packet. The pond covers an area 30' x 228' or 6840 sf. The site plan that Veon has sketched is accompanied by photos that are numbered and keyed to the drawing. The photos will be avail able at the meeting. Joel Settles, limnologist U.S. Soils Office, advises that the pond appears to meet specifications established by U.S. Soils office for wildlife ponds. He will ask the environmental engineer that specializes in this subject to review the ap plication and the site of excavation. Environmentally, he can see no problem. He advises that there are specific criteria that wildlife ponds must meet if they are to be effective. For Example: 1) drainage area must be extensive enough to keep certain level of water 2) slope of banks - must have gradual sloping banks 3) island area Unfortunately, the review can not be completed by Monday night's meeting. I would advise tabeling the application until we receive the necessary imput. *■ ^m . North - 1 use permit age area of ap- fe ponding area, zed collector point 1 drainage tile north west. Through d now drain out over roperty in the area mucky. Please re- ket. 0 sf. The site plan photos that are hotos will be avail- ze, advises that stablished by U.S. ask the environmental to review the ap- ie advises that there must meet if they to keep certain )ping banks CITY OF ORONO, MXNNlLbUTA Land Use Application • t MCATIOH of proposal (or property) Address Legsl I^®8cription Tel #applicant Name /^C-c>7 Mailing yt/ Address __ _ _y^'^ SSD^ ^ OWNER Name Mailing yJj?<y Address ^ Tel # Present Zoning TYPE OF APPLICATION Sketch Plan Review $50 Subdivision $150 + $10/Lot Conditional Use Permit ___$30.00 t/$50.00 Rezoning $250 Vacation $100 (Minimum) FEE ^/a f Date Rec'd L ^ • &/ By ^ • /lA . Present Use «^4oning Ordinance Section Relating to Request Q/' Specify Ordinan«;:e Reciuirements Explain your request and reasons for b9xsa /P^^'CUrum /? /f^AOy, VARIANCE j^Muired - extent of nonconformity _ _ _ Lol^Area _ _ Setback Front_ _ Side Width Re«r Other, explain Specify hardships to property SUBDIVISION application Residential Other! CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use Leted by Monday the application MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) Application completed Plat map section Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal Construction plans, if applicable 5. V Certified Property Omer's list of owners within (300*) from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance /A-603 Government Center e.V Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#1<. pre-addressed to each of the name.' on the abCH^ list. date Applicant's Signature DATE Owner's Signature Applicant hereby agrees to provide all information^^^quired or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all fees as established by ordinance. 5/78 i - TYPE OF application Sketch Plan Review $50 Subdivision $150 + $10/Lot Conditional Use Permit ___S30.00 t/$50.00 Rezoning $250 Vacation $100 (Minimum) e Rec • d L ^ J - &/ =3f :^^7' __ Rt«r SSS- PPLICATION ission aeeting) d Property Owner's list oi ithin (300') (*•••)- from I Co. Dept, of Finance ivernment Center legal sized envelopes(#lt essed to each of the name; ibp^ lis y guired or requested )oy ney. Planning Commission md further agrees to pay \ ^ y^yreyr z<> /'>^oryyt/£- /y y^ -A- P' o/ «» ^ / 5/78 HC'1233 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST yj' ^ Y' ^ ■^cy p /(>giP9. I u /^A^Cr Jf/^^ /P DEPARTMCliT OF FINANCE A-609 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS^ MN 09467 LIST ai» ^ir- I CESTIPY THAT THE FACTS SEPSESEWTEO OH THIS CERTIFICATE ARE AH ACCURATE AHO TRUE REPRE” SEHTATIOH OF IHFORMATIOH AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OH THE RECORDS OF THE HEHHEPIH COOHTY FIHAHCE OlVISlOH, TO THE SEST OF MY RHOMLEOSE AHO RELIEF. HEHHEPIH CO. FIHAHCE OlVISlOH a'/.Jk^ fS. DATE /2 FEE OWNER TAX PAYER / PROPERTY ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS ID 26 - //^ * 2-3 — Jof^A/ .l^Z/yjTA'jaA/ Lo»VC oac> • /•^.'i^? *' ''-----------------------------------------------— ‘ y //" •' " "___________________________—-------------------------------------------- ffPKfCt /aax, r ' - <. ____a£tyv/C Krk<Z‘^^ // ///// P/C •'____________________________OV>' f ^ ^ ^ ^ \J jC^ .^fTi 2. ------------------------------------------------------------------- fjJ f jy U-, >^^3^ CT^j^/0/PAc.fr'Py9. ----------------—— ----------------— */ f 9 /}yi \y ’fy^A//P^CT'yryyyt.je' ^ -s^Tzix M, lo'yt l/fK€. Mi aoc Cl. y ’/y' filler- _________________________ 2Z, - //p^' ^ /'JfyLiy 0£2^ i >i ^T^iloWIf BN ^IQftl fACTS HCPKCSOlTfO 0« THIS CCUHATC AMO TMUl MiOOf- ATION At IT AOPf AMt TMIt I or TMt MlMMfMIM COOMTY I TMt OttT Of Mt AMOMLtOiC t OlVItlOM - 1111 Tamarack Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 May 22, 1981 To Whom It May Concerni This letter is intended to convey my enthusiastic approval of •■hs efforts of Mr. and Mrs. Roger Veon in creation of a pond in the northeast quadrant of their property by excavation of a grassy wetland area. Prior to excavation, the area in question contained no small shrubs or bushes, and likewise no reedy vegetation which would provide suitable wildlife habitat. It simply had the shaggy appearance of overgrown grass and served no other purpose than as a breeding reservoir for mosquitos. The excavation has produced a lovely, mirror-like pond which is a pleasure to behold. T have noticed that the location is already being visited by a pair of Canadian geese, as well as the normal assortment of field birds and four-legged beasties. In the creation of this beautiful and habitable pondsite, Mr. and Mrs. Veon have demonstrated a high degree of understanding and appreciation toward the harmonious interworkings of the natural environment. Addition£*lly, they have displayed a high regard for the aesthetic sensibilities of their neighbors through their thoughtful attention to the location and the artistic contouring of the pond site. We all like it very much. Sincerely, John D. Albers (neighbor immediately to the north.) P i; TO:Planning Commission FROM;Jeanne A* Mabusth DATE;June 11, 1981 SUBJECT;#629 Allan C. Larson, Conditional Use Permit Zoning District - LR-lC Application - conditional use permit to construct retaining wall and replace wooden stair structure to lake shore dock The applicant proposes construction of a 40* lono S^s'high retaining wall to prevent further erosion of their lakeshore bank. It would appear that the original house construction so close to the bank created the severe instability. Rip rap is not feasible. The retaining wall is the only method available to control the extensive erosion that is contin uously weakening the stairs structure to the lake and even tually may cause structural damage to the house. The proposed stairs structure is far too ambitious and must be trimmed down. I suggest that the 6* maximum width stan dard for docks be allowed (spaced board construction). The 5' X 12' landing must be trimmed down to 5* x 6'. The new central location of the stairs is no problem. Any additional structure or decking on the surface of the shoreline must be replaced with eitner crushed rock or other permeable material. The replacement of the stairs, the landing 5’ x 6' in con sideration of the safety factor and the retaining wall are the only structure that can be considered within the pro tective lakeshore setback area. The retaining wall design will be reviewed by the City Engineer. I may have imput from our engineer at our meeting. • • CITY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA Land Use Application * IX)CATI01I OF PROPOSAL (or property) Address I«gal Description _ _ __ _ _ _ applicant Name ^ Ls/lioJ Tel # WW / >S3 Mailing i. a Address 55/z.z. OWNER Name Tel Mailing Address S. ji^V^Au • ~ Present Zoning TYPE OF APPLICATION Sketch Plan Review $50 Subdivision $150 + $10/Lot Cond^ional Use Permit $30.00 $50.00 n Rezoning $250 Vacation $100 (Minimum) 30 -oo /o f 77FEE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Rec * d ~ f/ hA. _ _ _ _ Present Use m '/-'Zoning Ordinance Section Relatinq to Reouest >^-8pecifv Ordinance Reauirements . jfi" 81981 I . u OF dR( Ebcplain your request and reasons for same J VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity Lot Area Setback Front Side Other, explain Rear J SUBDIVISION aoD : TYPE OF APPLICATION _ _ Sketch Plan Review $50 Subdivision $150 + $10/Lot _ _ Cond^ional Use Permit ^$30.00 _ _ $50.00 _ _ Rezoning $250 _ _ Vacation $100 (Minimum) FEE 30 •oo f 7 7 Date Rec' d to - _ _ By ^ ^ - m 8196 OF ORC Rear - 3^,s• /iL^ ^9al Description______________________________ applicant Name_^U,4jC^4/!:So.7 Tel »4W/>S3 Mailing Address fiUk.oi^/Ji\,u /}>, f/lti/U.A/v. ________ OWNER Name Wal. /Jei^^cJ Mailing Address 5. >l/€ • Tel #7>«? y57/ ^Present Zoning Subdivision $150 + $10/Lot _ _ Cond^ional Use Permit $30.00 _ _ $50.00 _ _ Rezoning $250 _ _ Vacation $100 (Minimum) FEE 30 ^ ^ 7 7 Date Rec' d // _ By ^ . /Sf. iV\ V'Present Use '/'Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request >^pacl£y Ordinance Requirements _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ WN 8198 OF ORC Bi^lain your request and reasons for same r rr VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity Lot Area _ _ Setback Front_ _ _ Other, explain Side Rear Specify hardships to pi SUBDIVISION app.Reside]^ fW-Kor. ^acplain •f Lots i/^CONDITI<MIAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail ^ « 12~L'U oJM icLc^ C<re\.l(T MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPI£TE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Comnission meeting) 1. Application coropletad C^jT^ertified 2, **^lat map section owners within^(300*^^4NNN*)-* from 3^ Certificate of survey of property Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance sketch location and setbacks of Ar-603 Government Center proposal ■—6. *^Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#1< 4. Construction plans, it ^pplicable pre-addressed to each the name on the alJOve lis DATE f Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature 'eCc.. . \ VDATE_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ __ ADDlicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all fees as established by ordinance. 5/78 f k- OCI^AIITMCNT OF FINANCE A-eOS OOVCRNMCNT CENTER ***NNEAF01,I8^ MN 55487 I Iai i-IST Silt FEE OWNER ■1 A> tr- \ If-A I CESTIFV THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ON THIS CERTIFICATE ARE AH ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION. TO TNE SEST OF MY ENOWLEOSE ANO OEUEF. HENNEPIN CO. FINANCE DIVISION A. ^1=^ TAX PAYER/ MAILING ADDRESS S-y T- //7 ]e-Z3 PROPERTY ADDRESS (30- 33 '-'’■8 .-r> c He.: w, £Li2ari=tm .-/»■;/ ftgAMP. I u A A . N€L^Ah/ iii■■ hi... -L. •■vt'.t .. e. N^L^h/ y.it /Vvi'.vt '/ ‘M . f; > • <1 i -ivr. I.VSV. - AVIL I'L V),/./v v'./f \ V J- 1 IN f J, /V>«^CALLLI/ll A ? •! I' >gPH U ■ ^eoHVvre U/A o R m 9 m AA/n^tfV ly AV V'.. L7 i(y'.. ‘V\\1<! ^ ^ I^I gN&LUA/O TAV(jl|Z OL GitANNtH^ roL, ^ €haujAJt^ MbK/O fiNtey 3HdVW r?r 1 :: 2 Wf • • * •w >•«»•% in ? ^ R c •% ^ rz 00^ < !• 3INNIM 7] M m . ^4 r%o/L^. «iji ».>«■ ! £2'd ‘Zlll‘Z-:')3S O P': ’T .*• '•) uXU I- / /aC'-.■ JUN 819 ^TYOF Olv Tho pi-osent condition of the stairway on the lakeshore is now in an unsai'e condition. Due to an erosion problem this stairway is new four feet lower then when oririnally c-nstructed. Hailir.f,s, stair treads and remaining: anchors are now over-rtr'essed. Complete replacement is the only means of avoidintt serious personal injury. Erosion problems plapue t'r.e lakeshore. ihe ""ain property location lies twenty feet' above wh'^t war or:•■'inally a ^5 derroo siote down to tho lake. !'bio has cha: 'ed vith sever’l locations now ocinr; ur to a dar.yercus ”0 de^tree dre: . Trees and other plant rewth, necessary for s.il retention, are lent a’^rjally, s’^rin ■ run eff the no.-t o-stiy :or.od. rroposed is a tnree sten . ian te rerlnce -ho unrafo rtalrway and -t the rr.nc rrover.h •.he future ice or thr IrKeehore -.ni 'he imrot'tar.t substructure. First a '*0 f ot Im' and 5? foot h.irr. railroad tie retaining wall would bo built. The wa ■ 1 wi: 1 be ccnntructod a* a 10 dee;roe pitch so tc u-e rravitv to "hold b-c- the hills" alrc. *er-B foot Icn.- "deadr.en" -ill be anchored in the 'niU to secure the v.ail. Renlr.cemont of ttc stai r.vay would be the r.e'<t -ter. Instead ol a dangerous ?.0 foot ntrnirht decline to the existing dock, a landing would be positioned half-v.-ay down the hill. With one side supported by the ret'^ining wall, six U"x4" pressure treated posts would be in stalled to support the opposite side. Thus the landing would be selT supported. The stairs would be constructed so that they are load bearing not on the hill but on the landing. This feature prevents a “4 foot drop" caused by any soil loss as in the present structure. Finally, b‘'neath the existing dock a rip-rap cea wall would be installed tc prevent future wave action from underr^ininf^ the retaininf, wa'l, stairs and other structures* t ill, ■. ......ii li JW d 1981 #629 !r I J i i u \ I I O Io o .L ‘: 0 i* \ \ i * W ^ . ^ • ' XT .^ \ \ \ \ \ v^ ^i ’ \'-^v'\ / V# ^ ol CITY OFUiuidS. riiiiillifiiiMfitta i ! TO:Planning Conunission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: SUBJECT: June 11, 1981 Darrell W. Seward, 1140 North Arm Drive Conditional Use Permit Zoning District - LR-lB Application - Conditional Use Permit ~ Non Conforming Use Area - 1.3 acres Mr. Seward plans to purchase the Leo Duehn property on North Arm Drive. Based on the conditions setforth in Resolution No. 1114 enclosed for your review, the new owner must apply for a conditional use permit. He plans to live in the existing residence and to continue renting the commercial structure to Keith Katcher. Seward plans to gradually upgrade the entire property and plans no commercial activity of his own on the designated residen tial area. Please review pages 2 and 3 that setforth the conditions under which the commercial activity may be conducted. ‘V » ■ -----------—---------------------------------------------------------- ; ^ ^ "t ^ \ 1 1^ . 1.1 /f -^OBA(rC*r •Mill rswic*]•l^i tJTSI SKItJ W5S [%mm rDsvKi«i I I *-1 IL. !i, City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL f.:-.. ••-ir. /: •.?4 NO. 1114 • k' ■ • Jkt f A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A LEGAL NON-CONFORMING USE, INCLUDING LOT USE RESTRICTIONS FOR KEITH KATCHER AND LEO DUEHN WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the City Council have reviewed a request by Keith Katcher and Leo Duehn to permit boat repair, relinishinq and storage on property located at 1140 North Aim Drive, an WHEREAS, said property contains a residence, a garage and a st.op building on approximately 1.3 acres of land as shown and legally legally described on Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, since 1941, the property has been the residence of Mr. Duehn as well as his place of business since 1949; and WHEREAS, coiTjnercial use of the property became a legal non- conforming use on January 1, 1968, effective date of Ordinance 93, the 1967 Zoning Code which established the area as a single rar.iily residential use district; and 'WHEREAS, on September 9, 1068, the City Council issued a Non-Conforming Use Permit (Exhibit 3) authorizing continued operation of the then existing "Leo's Body Shop" for auto repair ana auto body repair purposes; and WHEREAS, in October, 1977, Keith Katcher leased the shop building from Mr. Duehn and converted the auto repair business to KK & Kompany, a boat repair and reCi.nishing business; and WHEREA.!, Mr. Duehn continues to reside on the property and sinultanoously uses portions of tho property for the comjr.ercial storage of boats; and WHER.EA3, Section 31.100 of the current 1975 Zoning Code alleys continuation of all existing legal non-conforming uses of land such as the previously documented auto repair business; and WHEREAS, Section 31.101 p.-ovidcs that non-conforming use may not bn changed to another non-conforming use". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The property has always been residentially used and is considered to be primarily residential property. Commercial activities on the property will always be considered accessory to tho primary residential use. 2. A certain level of commercial activity on the property may be carried on as in the past, pursuant to legal non-conforming use permits, but this use shall not be substantially changed or increased in intensity. PAGE , OI 4-— )NO OUNCIL !S^ng '’lot'’use 'Ls?Lctions city Council have to permit boat repair, 40 North Arm Drive; and nee, a garage and a as shown and legally 2en the residence of 1949; and became a legal non- 2 of Ordinance 93, as a single faraily Council issued a g continued operation repair and auto body r leased the shop building inoss to KK & Ko.rpany, on the property and • the coTJTiercia 1 storage 1975 Zoning Code allows iq uses of land such as *the non-conforming use - $ he City Council of the gs of fact: entially used and is property. Commercial be considered accessory vity on the property may ; to legal non-conforming i substantially changed or I CITY City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1114 3. Boat repair and J|®Q®^dy^repair^and therefore rlha^,rtn^rse fo L.c„t prohibited by Section 31.101. furthermore, renewal'^of a*'Non-Conforming“r j-aitJSLf 5L=?^?:i^t ?ir^^.^s?rurure"or^ portion o« the property, subject to the following conditions: the following: 1. • •.- •«.= eHaii he carried on as much as possiblefit^h!rJL “e^ntI^raho“^Liiain, -g^^hi^r^ -i^eri^ifrniStT uSs “;hy^hrough 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M., extended to 8.00 P.n. auriny August. b) CoFMercial parking or of autos, boats^ trailers, parts and related equipment shall be limitcc. to Are shown on Exhibit A. part of repairs being dene on the site. d) NO More than 20 boats are permitted on the property at any given time, summer or winter. e) Boat storage as a commercial repair.Inly storage of boats otherwise undergoing or awaiting repa 3 Area 2 is to remain exclusively residential in carri©d on in the shop building. 4. Should the .hop building f^colSllcilt by fire, flood or other na^ral «®;"enoe activity ceases for a period of twelve vi i j all non-conforming use of the property shal PAGE _2.0F >! wn* ;CITY> [ORpNO City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1114__________ 5. Additions to the shop building are not permitted, however, nothing in these conditions shall be construed as to prohibit normal repairs, maintenance or incidental alterations to the shop building provided the area or bulk of the building is not increased. 6. In addition to the above conditions, so long as Leo Duehn or his wife reside on the property, they may continue to commercially store and/or repair boats provided the maximum nu-mber of 20 boats for the entire property xs not exceeded. This use may include Area 3 on Exhibit A. This portion of the permit shall expire when the Duehns no longer reside on the property at which time ,\rea 3 shall revert solely to residential open space. This personal right of use by Leo Duehn and his wife shall bo non-transferable. 7. This permit for non-conforming use of the property must be renewed upon change in ownership to any party other than Leo Duehn or Keith Katcher, or upon any proposed change in use other than listed above. This permit may be reviewed and/or revoked upon complaint or non-compliance with conditions noted herein as provided by ordinance. 8. This permit shall not serve to grant any property right other than as specifically provided and conditioned herein. Adopted this ?day of February 1980. a 'u. william B. Van Nest, Mayor ATTEST: 1 PAGE 3 OF 4 t .1 : City of ORONO CITY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ni4 PNA Jk- l‘i * ] Leo Duehn and his wife, KK & Kompany, Keith Katcher and his wife, all agree on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that the terms of this Resolution shall so restrict the future use of this property, as legality described on Exhibit A. C /' Leo 4 KK & Kompany, by Its 421^ Keith Katcher FACE 4_ OF__4 r EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. Sketch of Property at 1140 North Arm Drive for Non-Conforming Use Permit AREA 1 - Co.Tmercial Use Area AREA 2 - Residential Area - no comncrcial use perr.ittod AREA 3 - Leo Duehn's Storage Area & residential open space Legal Description - entire parcel including Areas 1, 2 & 3 as shown above PIN 07-117-23 14 0061 THAT PART OP THE N J06.2 PT OP THE S s;C 7 T 117 R 23 OESC AS BE6 AT A PT 2A0 PT U PROtl THE E LINE OP SAID SEC CEinER LINE OP CO RO MO ISl TN SIT SEC HITH A LINE ORAMN PAR WITH AM) SOS.A PT TH E AlONS SAIO PAR LINE TO R/A HITH SAIO N LINE OP S SOS.4 PT THE E LINE OP SAIO SEC TH SLT ALONG OP THE N ISS PT OP SAIO SOS.4 PT TH OP SAIO C 240 PT TN N TO BEG EX RO SOS.4 PT OP THE SE 1/4 OP THE NE 1/4 ON THE N LINE OP SAIO S SOS.4 PT OIS TH HLT ALONG SAIO N LINE TO THE ALONG SAIO CENTER LINE TO ITS INTER- OIS lOS PT S FROn SAIO N LINE OP S AN INTERSEC HITH A LINE 0RAM< SLT AT PROM A PT THEREIN OIS SIB.4 PT PRON SAIO R/A LINE OIS 30 PT TO THE S LINE ELT ALONG SAIO S LINE TO THE W LINE TO;Planning Conunission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE:June 11, 1981 SUBJECT; #626 C.E. Van Eechout, 1025 North Brown Road Subdivision Zoning District - RR-IB Application - Subdivision - plat - 7 lots Total area - 16.62 acres 1.5 acres of wetlands Mr. Van Eechout has reapplied for his 7 lot plat previously reviewed by the Planning Commission in the summer of 1979. The plat is the same as before. A private road will serve the plat; there will be no direct access to lots 1 and 7 off Brown Road. The road shall be designated as an outlot. The wetlands have not been shown on the new plans and must be designated by drainage easements on the preliminary plans. I have enclosed portions of the previous application file dealing with the question of lot width. The building set- bac’'. line affording the required 200* width should be de signated on the plat for Lot 5. It would be helpful if the preliminary plans would reflect the required building setback (to include 30' side 50' front and rear). Lots 4 may also need a specific designation noting the 200' width line. The septic test information has been submitted. Gaffron will prepare a report for the public hearing meeting in July. war: cown Road - )lat previously unmer of 1979. )ad will serve Lots 1 and 7 1 as an outlot. 5lans and must reliminary plans. Lication file building set- should be de helpful if ired building =ar). Lots 4 the 200' width ,ed. Gaffron I meeting in CIl’Y OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Land Use Application % lOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property) Address 1025 Brown Rd. North______ Legal Description South 1/2 Section 27 applicant Name_C. E. Van Eeckhcut Tel #473-0825 Mailing Address 120 S. Brown Rd. OWNER Ncunc Mailing Address Present Zoning Tnnq Tirike. W. 55356 Tel #_ _ _ _ _ TYPE OF APPLICATION _ _ Sketch Plan Review $50 Subdivision $150 + $10/Lot ^ Conditional Use Permit _ _ $30.00 _ _ $50.00 _ _ Rezoning $250 _ Vacation $100 (Minimun.) fee -io90l Date RecM .fc ■ P Rj a Present Use Field Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request Specify Ordinance Requirements 2 acre ••• • ' V Explain your request and reasons for same to divide said land into 7 building— - ' v^n?nw7fiir^lots and erect hones. JUW ^I9W VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity _ _ Lot Area _ _ Setback Front_ _ Side _ _ Other, explain _ _ _ _ _ CI i) i ‘ ^ Rear Width Specify hardships to property ,.V , :tU|l\y/ ^i!', iur*"'------------ i ‘ \ , JUN 41981 SUBDIVISION application XX Residential Other, explain No. of Lots CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) Application completed Plat map section Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal Construction plans, if applicable Certified Proj>erty Owner's list o owners within (300') (150*)- from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center Stamped, legal sized envelopes(#1 pre-addressed to,each of the name on the above list. . ''' DATE ft-2-ai Applicant's Signature DATE Owner's Signature Same Applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all fees as established by ordinance. 5/78 W79 r> D I .1 hi t_______t —--v! .' 4 t* 4. * MINirrES OF A FL.ANN1NG COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MAY 21, 1979Page D Audrey Heiser represented the applicant. It was stated that a driveway permit would be required from Hennepin County Highway Department. She stated she had contacted them and was informed that they anticipated no problems but suggested the access be as far south as possible. Frahm questioned the status of vacant land located at 2650 Tonknwa Road and asked staff to check it out. A Public Information Meeting has been scheduled for June 11, 1979. Mr. Van Eeckhout was present. The wetlands are presently sho\>m as an outlot. Lot lines must be dra\vTn through wetlands and designated by a drainage easement. Some of the lots do not meet the 200' lot width requirement. The plan will have to be revised to meet this requirement. Septic testing need to be done. Hannah moved to approve the Minutes as submitted. Motion seconded by Adams. Vote: Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10:50 P.M. ENERVEST BUILDERS 325 West Lake Street SUBDIVISION/VARIANCE Sketch Plan Review (,7460) CHUCK VAN EECKHOUT 1025 No. Brown Road SUBDIVISION Sketch Plan Review (,7479) APPROVAL OF MINUTES MAY 7, 1979 ADJOUR.NMENT 7^62 3 / j; \PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING June 1, 1979 #4 U Planning Conuniasion directed staff to define for accepted method of determining the 200' width at building site. Mr. Van Eeckhout was advised to make the following changes xn the sketch plan: 1. Realign lot lines to satisfy the 200' width at buildxng site. 2. Wetlands are to be combined with adjacent lots. Staff note, June 1, 1979 Method for determining lot width at building site. 1, Line is to be drawn through front line of house. 2. Lot on a Cul de sac 3. Lot on street The new plans meet the requirement set forth at our last meeting. The applicant must supply the following to proceed with his preliminary application: 1. List 7 property owners within 300’. 2. Topographic map of plat area. 3. Required septic testing for each of the seven lots. 4. Certificate of stirvey. 5. Report from Hennepin Soil Office. #626 / •'U ■ «<IV, ¥