Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-04-1981 Planning Packet
FK AGENDA Planning Coininlssion Meeting Monday, May 1981 Council Chambers 7:30 PM Call to Order 1. Call to order/roll Public Hearings 2. 7:30 PM #603 Richard Raiche, 2901 Watertown Rd. Subdivision 3. 7:45 PM #609 Ruxton R. Strong, 420 South Brown Rd. Subdivision Action Items 4. #607 Robert G. Bredeson, 1410 Rest Point Rd. Variance 5. #610 Jack Davis, 1345 Vine Place Variance 6. #611 Donald H. Weiss, 2245 Shadywood Rd. Variance Work Session 7. #612 A.H. Evans, 575 Oxford Rd. Vacation Information Items 8.Minutes of Joint Council and Planning Commission Meetings of April 5, 1981 9.Formal Recommendation to Council by the Planning Commission in regard to the Fence Ordinance amendment. 10. Memo - Village Planner - Mound Fire Department Approval of the Minutes 11. Approval of the minutes of April 6, 1981 ,<4-1 0' *f i .f AGENDA Planning Coininisslon Meeting Monday, May 9^, 1981 Council Chambers 7:30 PM Call to Order 1. Call to order/roll Public Hearings 2. 7:30 PM #603 Richard Raiche, 2901 Watertown Rd. Subdivision 3. 7:45 PM #609 Ruxton R. Strong, 420 South Brown Rd. Subdivision Action Items 4. #607 Robert G. Bredeson, 1410 Rest Point Rd. Variance 5. #610 Jack Davis, 1345 Vine Place Variance 6. #611 Donald H. Weiss, 2245 Shadywood Rd. Variance Work Session 7. #612 A.H. Evans, 575 Oxford Rd. Vacation Information Items 8.Minutes of Joint Council and Planning Commission Meetings of April 5, 1981 9.Formal Recommendation to Council by the Planning Corrmission in regard to the Fence Ordinance amendment. 10. Memo - Village Planner - Mound Fire Department Approval of the Minutes 11. Approval of the minutes of April 6, 1981 I. ^ — . - . . ^ . T»- I i .*!:*! 5 ^ 1 TO:Planning Comission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: SUBJECT: April 29, 1981 #603 Richard Raiche, 2901 Watertown Rd. Preliminary Subdivision Public Hearing • May 4, 1981 Your approving recouanendation should contain the following conditions: 1) Private driveway to serve all three lots, no direct access for Lot 1 to Watertown Rd. 2) Removal of existing road bed down center of property. Developer's agreement will be required if improvements not completed prior to final plat approval. 3) City to acquire road and utilities easement over drive- way outlet. 4) All disturbed areas to be seeded within 10 days of grading completion. 5) Payment of park dedication fee in the amount of $600.00 $200.00 for each lot. I town Rd. - ain the following ts, no direct access er of property. if improvements oval. ement over drive- n 10 days of grading amount of $600.00 HC 1233 ocMimicNr or finmci *-•©» OOVCmwCNT CCNTCR •UNNCArouak m SS4S7 gWOPEWTY 0WHgR8 11ST llr- MtT tilf I CfUTIFY THAT TH* FACTS H^NCSEnT^ ON This ■•**1*^***^* accusate ano true rcfre» z.'!S5r's^Tr.;v„Tr':r.^z.MO tcuer. ^ "••owLCo^f HCNNCPIM CO. FUfANCC OlViSlOII OATC. FEE CfttHER TAX PAYER/ MAILING ADDRESS Ac^c. property address ^ - //F- 2.^ - £Z2.£i^ U/^ fury/ I o /? -- 1^------------I ii^r£^rxu/A//^ r 1.auEd 1 ^CtaJS^£l jT i! c: StBW s 1979 } ROLLING MEADOWS OFj ORONO ^ ‘tn SCALE til fLCf COPOON R. COFFIN CO. INC. a L«%r ;c«.: ^tpt . MtssrscTi ^ ^ 0, •. • i» ■m0 0 . « /• «k. .. •« **r r •%c •••*••• «*.1 *••«•- « X 5 V •* •»« «r 0 1^. . * *0^. • ♦ *• • • •• ^ ^ V•^f $*»*4S i»* P «• « .* « % *»■ •• .■ '» •" *«i ’ • • •• •« •- ^ •.><• •« iI f-ps. rr? 1 V> - FEB 2 51981) I 1 ! i'. « ( *‘ ,1 i ■ ' ■ TO:Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: April 29, 1981 SUBJECT: #609 Ruxton R. Strong# 420 Brown Rd. South Subdivision Staff Update Staff wishes to respond to questions raised at our last meeting concerning the proposed subdivision. Gaffron states this is no problem since there is ample soils to allow future septic expansion. His memo of April b, 1981, notes concern with the existing system that appeared t be "non conforming." Gaffron reviewed with the applicant the irregularities found on the site. Strong noted it was a met hod suggested to clear drainfield lines. Gaffron will make another site inspection? hopefully, I will be able to report his findings at the meeting. The wetland is located 18* from south property line. At that point an 18’ wide road would be located right at the south property line. A variance of 26' from the wetland will be required. There are no setback requirements for roads to property lines. The road will require engineering plans that will determine adequate sizing of culvert for drainage way to the south. If approved, your recommendation should contain the following conditions: 1) Flowage & Conservation easement over the 1.3 acres of wetlands. 2) city to acquire underlying road and utilities easement over Outlot B or A. 3) All access to 3 lots via plat road. 4) Ownership of Outlot A must be decided - Planning Commission may advise applicant to combine this outlot with road out lot for benefit of shared ownership. 5) Payment of Park dedication fee in the amount of $400.00 $200.00 for each undeveloped lot. i ♦ %.J b. #609 Ruxton R. Strong Subdivision Page 2 6) City must be satisfied that existing septic system on lot 1 conforms to all City standards before final plat approval. 8) Dedication of additional right of way for Brown Road. ic system on re final plat Brovm Road. LiiT titt OlWCR paver / MAM.IRG ADDRESS sMTincarf aac an accuaVa •■ntation Of lafoaMATiiTif 5. -® Mfaf- oart ON TNf afeoaot of tnV fJI*f»•«« OIVIOION. TO T« •MT**Sr*^'*' ®®***’^^ "•0 oiucf. "■ tr KNONLcoee NtaacfiN CO. riNANcc division MTC. -3 T-/I 7 i^Z3 . jit ®i^'A-AriT CAf/ MAAhJ jp ^.£). gio7 ^TioS" -4i£Ls____IsVVc Id.u/t/'VOMJ H>Ljj>i — ‘^b'vaz. . IP ~^o7~En: Z733T n r-iTir ......... -I.. /44b -------------¥^^i^.^LS2sLC0 PT pr^ property address no)- ^01 pp 7(^-3/ ----BC/Mf/y p> / i ' M2 7fQfl| iKor^o __ SIfV- WMl- ?tmV ^tA«f TNit r^ •/.T**!?*^'** * •••^ XV KN0»LC0«C fVltlON ^ address ID P«^W2»I a ’ Lss.v,, ) 1— _j/1a 3 A / 4 / i4€ }\ I ^ ^ /- • <\J- \ > \ • * .v-f ■ ;■ I». »|N #60, ^"=Pector «“«o„ strong, on the p ®®Ptic i-h rf-.r ■:: ~ fay^be JSJ®. ■*®3d^“on"® ®*'=®"«ng^th“' *"^*='’ o^th"^ ®e»^age in#-®“^i®e^tha? into 3Xo„.. P-aSoi*- £S “iS£#iSr-X%r -- not *ppa«=Sra%“£i^cfa'U^^^^^ PP ho\"rx "'■““Id Wi P^ thlTx “® ^..a --in .ot 6 toe nrea n6 .., --ie .ot ; "^^®inf?eii®® ample a ^ PPPbUm,.^'’- “P^e^lca^t^o^Pf,^alr soUa r °" POpPld not po/°P “®® asPPP® any „aj„^ Hf rtw.. because you quu^w proposal for this iTze lot. .^w make recommendation to Council.-Aa imn mm ^'>f-*-.-^i|>»ileNfc* f -- TO;Planning Commission FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE;April 30, 1981 SUBJECT: #607 Robert G. Bredeson - Variance Comparison of hardcover Existing house Proposed house 1965 sf (including driveway) 3467 sf a) 440 sf - add to above figure for proposed driveway location b) 250 sf - if driveway located no more than 25' from cul de sac Hardcover - Proposed house 0-75' - 2667 sf 75' - 250' - 800 sf Setback Comparison Proposed house - never closer than recomirended 40' Existing house - 36' on west shoreline Staff Comments 1) House could be relocated closer to cul de sac - 35' recommended. This location would meet front (street) setback standard, protect lakeview of houses to north and be more in keeping with average lakeshore setback requirement for new construction. The house is very ambitious given the size and lakeshore set back limitations. If approved the applicant must be made aware that the City will allow no additional accessory hardcover. If there are to be defined walkways, they must be pervious to water such as crushed natural stone. In addition, no other accessory structure will be allov/ed on property - nor to remain. Review of above 1) Move house west to meet 35' setback from cul de sac 2) Ask for removal of any sheds, accessory structures or paved areas on site 3) Any additional improvements on site must be pervious to water Ask applicant to consider a reduction in size of proposed house because you doubt if Council will approve such an ambitious proposal for thii size lot. Don't hold applicantions up but make recommendation to Council. Tv.\- b ,f ’• *■*i 4 Tt • ^ * • / • >. “Vx. X \/ / N \ s \ .y^s \ \ . N \\ \X X \ N -V V \. \ •\' N \ N X NX* • • •»'.\ - f- r\: r-I I >, in yVf, t x « r.. ‘ • • •iOT i-cv..' c. I - ‘' A z ~ ' •»• ; : • ^ i\ ^ W't*^!i^ ':<3 r .1. T. ♦ ';.'.A 1 • .#•Hti nr »• # ««% > • A M •: f H* I Vf? t- ^ % K . #, ,^-V^ ‘ i »{V-. .1 f •:-i ■? X• .N t * ’i •- ■V *» * •: ’ ^: : • L " y*-* - ? .rl* ¥ “v{,ts *• %r*‘ /1l1? «l 9 • ^ .•>1 • L f ^ A^'r. ♦ , mmm ^0 M> »• ► A •V 1 £-^0^ 7 c. —W URONO SUMLIiiau. ^ -y. Hf«..ot. i,3,3 <*>»• w rrtatr ^~-*“****^ tioL «V mr *«»T .r*oti.r®[;;?**** H*«‘T .r ot^rT!?**** I - u ^OPERIY address / s <y T / ^ , 7^ / ~~~T~. ' ■ «- list of exhibits *W«lbit 3 '■ll !-l <^ \ • » iu^ ®^*^NER Mg jy ^ y>i (Mdii-rnim, y 7/- 7^1^ '-t2jlS-jJjJXe 1 (<to) agent m-__________A-JJacent parcels of ia„d| « . * ^^^*PPlle«tl«i feta ' -L rrop«rc 0««r. u.t ' C*relftc«c« of Sutvgj f»f Mcatpe t/4^S ^•^Mnfri—tiBii * -SC Wat Hg^ ^ -X^*^®*iv#ntorjr * Jtaff Cbv- fithrr iwfog— NOTICES mSENT ZONING USE DISTRICT JLoL „fr:^ 3. present use Vae««c Umd------- *«aWi«g(,, LK-1R describe request __ ___ Oecuplad >ulldijig(g) ’• ^PMNCE(S) required ..*.1--------------EO do th€ rcquMttd Work: ' ®**kack (- - Front stdo .. . •- - *"r) Oehor ¥ l®t Arag Lot Width in ^ - - lUar) Othar "XUSUAL PROPERTY, CONDITIONS ***'de«ir#r ■’•fttlri <-v^ •“"“•f I. ttv. and ^rroct »»>' ‘"<o~tlo„ ""*• Frof . .,/, y, ’ vyH';' icant’s Signature ‘ Date ’^'¥i¥¥¥ ^'^' " 's Signature Date/ ■lllllllllllyiM ---- list of exhibits ---- AM»llc«tlM rotm —i. ftMMra t4ac Carttrieat* of Sucvaj ^*9 iMolpc ^ not Iter ^ -h^ to ry landl ‘ .M^stoff ^****~ InfTT— f •1^ ON COST $ -.•Moo-/- •-<•1 jt, 'uL.^: -</y/V Mr 1*00 - Lot Width N*rda«ror Ood. rov.lr-«,t. /frrr • application. SlIo?r! •• •*“• •MUeoti., •«*"to, eoMtoaleo oaobora of Invoatiaatloo and ' Bate OJ^ISSTOH MFPTTM/y vC^IITMCirr OF FINANCE *-•08 OOVeRNMCNT CENTER MINNERROLiat NN 88487 i**T aiit 1 "«V«t«r;:"s.r.i7r.nn IUlf*'®* 0‘ViaiOM, TO THC••*0 acucF. * ••*T or my knomlcooc NCNntriN CO. riNANCj— OWNER payer / -Mailing adorfs ^ OATC, / / Wifi -/ 1.^ km^ Jlr. «? • •• TNIt " «pt .mt"!!?"''" ***" "• •••^ KNOWLCO0C kNCj / *v 3 / ’■------4 sg V^Affc- >P/L2^3- —W (Z^3-3/ EXH I B I T CITY OF ORONO APPLIC. ?l’< t 4f 5in"v«-* for omfeP’o In I'T'.rt. uuia :^urvc^ f.v>, /at Ho}.nc(Jn Cuuiity, Mnnonott viU^ 7c ul^j2. Cortlficatc of Survey: or o ■?'“ *“ '• ■•''"■«=*■ ro; .■o.cr.t,...io„ Mo Sr 01' F, He^lstercd i^ru ourvoyMo. 4cfc, ^vCiPT that part thereof iyic^- Sout-ori/ cf fi** lo'iowlr • '"f-fl-’-S «t t,.„ iootU,.oUrr;-c:n.o"r'o ■ ; L "■ “f *-->Wriy olo,,^ too Soot:,on,' liL Iroroof i'. .? drrL‘un;“rrit'i.';;sr.^;'"'‘”“ °- •■•'>---i-^r.o.:noo .Itio., County ol Honnepl'., and of tna location of uU bujl i'-B thorocr. and aii viaitio oncroacfr.«ntc fror. or on .“id ill. •i I- = 60' 6-2-77 Iren saricor Gordon T\. (ofiin HO|;. oCt4 Ltnd l»urvc/cr uriu ?i..r.nor I/>nt Lake, Kinn«jr.oUi i V.,-* ^ f-f I #6lo " ?l " •y • v: •.« %• ' y • / c /f.viS*A‘ CTiS* o, >»y oD •»'7 /^ V z' / All*' ■r:'v ^ppuc. OiiZ Uf UKOiXu I LAND USE PLANNING ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY VARIANCES REQUIRED DENSl^f wmiMwi iitounqjy U* «#M Ut wiMk * I Zoning Use District C-~P l - \ ^ icniiL VANIAI^CT CODE iCCTIOH SETBACKS fiiitiiww wuiw __as'__ ipriSTma FNOK)SED 20 jS2ji COOC StCTlOB 7S rt. fiL. UJT AMBA JMJU t.g> FCRKITTED MAM>COVCIl _____________% CXXSTUCC MAJIDCOVIJI s.f. fnoposcd haadcovu TOTAL VMUAirCZ Jl EmI.____J& COPE SECT! SI.on 34.202 34.202 *-4k« aso - soo rt. 3os Lako ftOO - 1000 rt. J%% 34.202 34.202 OTHER SECTIONS EXIST mo mOFOSED vmiiAiiCE SECTICW WikiAf U iAa .I LAND ®*'^^*®** r^®E M-S __ unplatlttO O lots/p«rccl» p«r •pplicatioii AVXXlASJLXTYi •djacsnt lota/|Mrc«i« (t | vacant occuplad _____ aaam ovnarafilp Jsntiarx 1975 CXmarahip _ TOrooSAfliy incliiaaat laliaahorn _____ %*atlanda -------- ataap alopas _j__opan aaaaa ______voodad araaa (BOCSAfinr affactlnp applicaticMit unuayal lot ahapa ____*** *ii*/«h.p.i ---- coMlatMt -----lf.con.l.t.nt «l^f.*l9hborh^‘a^iiIloi^r MCKHi -------- M. MUtin* --------- city _____ county/.t.t. _____ private oriLlTUS. City aa.ar --------avallabl. --------- e^no«:t.d, city ..tar _____ avatlabla _ eo«..ct. aaparata ewnarshlp ■ Ingle eeparate _ _coablned with other parcela net in this appliration •nda high ground • ^ -• - - -- —j.;:!. laval ground roiling hilla unuaual building location ■aptic ayatan LAND USE •ubjact lot ia ___ DlSrXdO XAMD USE rsoroSAL affacta new propoaad eaiating conformi^exiating aubatandard axiating ndo^confeniiAg vacant onparad to Z.occupied >U»9 y atatxiett s/ conforalny uaa principal lX. accaaaory building or oaa conditional uaa >«Mi*eofifeaainf uaa STRUCTURES BUriM MttDlM* Aaficianciaai do not conply with aoning parfornanca atandarda antiraly nw building or uaa will A^rauiaw aa PDt building or uaa feeat aacaada SOS mvi Exuti4*b!!ir^?A?A i” will not reduce an oxiating aubatandard yard dinanaioo TAXES & ASSESSMENTS FROrtdfY xo. ______ *^^*^**Ecaia owned in cown TAID currant Aaaaaaaanta Laviadi ______ iawar fno} •*^**J®1 legally ccxibinad for tax pufpoaaa. •CO DELZnoOEinr to yaar unita batar (no)unita ; Use District L~R. - \ ^ sccriOH coot StCTlOf «V»SX, \\r CITY OF ORONO LAND USE PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS EXHIBIT 6 Page I PREPARED FOR; „ . PlamiiAf OoMniaaion Me«tin9 (Data) caouneil Maating fOata| CStaff) APPLICATION REVIEWED BY: City Adainiatrator • . City Atteroay City En^inmmr Villafia yiannar Adainiatrator ^llc Worka Coordinator **^iic Safaty Diractor Financa Diractor Duildiog Inapactor - Saptie Xnapactor Nannapin Cty. DOT Minn. Stata DOT Minn, omi EXHIBIT 6 Page I N«nn«pin Cty. Dot Minn, ttattt DOT Hinn. OHII NCMD LMCD Uca. CITY OF ORONO ' LAND USE PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS EXHIBIT 6 Page 1 PREPARED FOR; BY; N«nniit9 Cumaisaion Maatlng CO«ta) CouneU Maetiftg {Data) ___________ IStaff) ______ g. APPLICATION REVIEWED BY; . City AdiaijiiatrAtor •. , City Attorney City bifinMr VillMgiA riariA«r AdMlniatrator Flannlfif Oofiniaslon Fark OoiiMiaaloii FubUc Worka Coordinator Fublic Safoty Olractor Financa Diractor Building Inapactor - Saptic Inapactor . Nannapin Cty. DOT Minn. Stata DOT Minn. OlfR MCWD LNCO SPECIAL COMMENTS - g C-t STAFF REC(MMENDATI0N ArMOVI application aa aubolttad approve application subjact to tolloxinf conditlona ------ TAPUt application foe additional InfoniMtlon Onnr application tot r.aaona notad abowa EXHIBIT 6 Page 1 CITY OF ORONO LAND USE PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS exhibit 6 Page 2 SUGGESTED FINDINGS __.^ r.ra-. cooditloiia ApplyiM ftA .... w..... _ “• —«.. .. . . . .. _ _____ ^ «--• ■»* - ^ >. ., ^ ***• ®'>^«fc«n.lv« Land Os* »- contrary td th. ^ ooMprtth«nalv« Land Uaal7i« _ _.. _ ~ - —>»• >- -..w..... SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL >■ fOvjp> VfliVjCl ^. .cd2u d. ft. exhibit 6 Page 2 *•"* ** tM th« di.trici ^ Pr*ft«rv«iiofi ana •"ioy^nt of • « pubUe h..lth. ctmtort. '*nt of tlM Oo«p„h,„,i^, Und t of th« 0»«pr«>,«„,iv,Land Oso to tho applicant, but is nucusaary na thor.for* th* ,r«itin, of UbE PMKNING ^ zoning variance application CUT OF ORONO I-"?!?; w?',’;,""•' • ij imM3W[§W applicant ' cT^yjjPoRrtl^^j ^«> IS ^•*ning Addreaa ^>•^rr^;^t Jen /J>rnc„,„n » iftt A /. Application Fcr® r H«Ulnf Addre.i _ AcquH^ ^ (do) ^do nn^\ __ -W r ly I fa Ortificnte of 5„,v Oe Rec ipt D.ite Rcreivrd 4 — H- i *’' \ .<2 n f r> ••— I (do) (do not) also own nf-------- (^VJnlh/yca^) AGENT ^dj..cent p«rcoU of landj -— Phone Hailing Addreat notices I, .... present ZONING USE DISTRICT PRESENT USE «..id™,i.i _>s:_ -------V.e.dt aulldlng(.) ipn -s^-^ t«VArya*i - fit Applicant Occupied Buildingf.) l 9 — describe request — ~ -“■■•- -------_ „ ...... CONSTRUCTION COST — _ add on ~ ^ ~Describe request in detail: — Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover — —vLner 10. Descriue UNUSUAL PROPERIT CONDITIONS .^...^7 “- - - - - - -■__________________________ ’'***' Cod. r,,ulr«i,nta: 11. DescribTiiSBbE HARSIiiTF rrioilationa or PRACTICAL DI fFTSI^;;; Of toning 12. Describe EFFECT n^' nr,'■rPCT Or PROPOSED WORK on neigMK>ri„g prop„ti,. "" "'Uhborhood general ^ true and^ecj »„ the b,„ oJ ‘"^o"«tion r C^fiCC, 7P // / “ knowledge: sign and date thic a., t • . '——■ ,72.?.* .poi.c.,, vorif.cuon th?. “f«‘on .no ’ r C\ inv nr.nTT.-c .r,-., ------ .exhibit 1 rs land f'»rrj^nt,gn * Include; ' ^rllcHtlon Firm 2 Tvyrtty (VTirra Mi ^ C^rtfflr^te cf 5urv ^ »'**e R, c . ipt Rfcelved 4^21^ X ■• -N .a iij- ' ' f 1 -^^^Vfnior) Staff Cicjirnta Pt W ^rr rvit l on H# ^ --.3—'i^~ (Hzjir^ ON COST ^ A/ypiJ'f’ ^~y?/*> * — ®*» rrn-L.i-i— *'*'**« — t,pUc, __ Lot Width Hardcover 'ii»~! *«>*"» Code r«julrrr*nti: f roB ttrlet of *^ninp *'• "«t,M.crhood Ir.f «^eral is application. ‘•ZsluTtV* . Odent*, »mrri r»w«.g of lnv,,tl,,t,p„ • ^ ■Lrc U j tff/ » Date ------ T c~r ~f'V vrp'tT,.- Mi—T- L' •■ » ' » oimrtmcnt of FINMCC *-•0* OOVCRHMC n T CCNTtR MINNCAFOLMt MM SS407 PiOPEWTY fMimroif , „T cSUmlnTn « iSSL*.,*?”""™ ®" MtNNCPIN CO. FINANCe DIVISION PEE OWNER DATg_^- TAX PAYER/ mailing ADDRF5^<; ^3eA/ y&xLMMa./. QLLm^l PROPERTY ADDRESS /7- // 7 y IZ2Z4 ■2^/4 Mapjs^J^Q^ Ai .2:2^ IX^2J7 - ry ^ 2.Z --------- W/kt ^ Ji Z.'* -7 fc^/4z./'iO^ U<-r3w.«Y S4trft^ /. -^^^•CdV-K l2rg^4 7 »A'4^,av^ <;>/ z 0/7.1 o/ 2. taf ^I JO lifts- ^ il.LS.l^fv,Tp, ^ «<g./y / L Zrr /y .gf^74 ■STSt.^ C S^fs-. dlfitre/ P^Ji ^-xn CITY OF ORG J^o/ k/^ DATC RL-C'D B-n ^•'0 A prl in Suaj^f T .r*^* -----------------____________________________________ I AW ACCURATC AND TRUE RERRc-. ^.uTio«.. ,T ecorm op the nsmnerir county ® ^*** §MT OP MV RNOWLEOCE 'INANCE OlVltlON property address g-//7- OOa J £• A’ • - ** •• LI //--------- # ------------------------- -- 4#------- r 1 UfiB HA 9 ’IV ^ - m ncr |L > /•/*■^P •• W ♦ irr 1 — ^ //I" >. /rvii Am a r-Kv •^'j\ \‘J^^i\ '^■' * ^J« 5; m<M vt!^ • wU 5>l «0 •»« .*^1;$> m = • V • ^ = *, i* — :»'i \ -s-.-- y • ^___.-. X/ si" L AVNn;p=^ •• s. 2'5. >j»rr ■ * S 5T vNA I ?>| fi %‘Jl 2>fc «^ V5 7 variance s REOUTRFn density“ —— WJWIMUH lirytyt.^ .-IQq* PUNNING ZONING VARIANCE INVENTORY A ctu al ' 1 ■— VANIAxct Zoning Use District " L R - u~ ------------------- COPE SCCTIOli \oo glwunm M»uiart« >»«oyosn> ^.5-' VAA1 AX eg c27' COPE SttTli 3i.74r, !• Bl«y. "*k«s)ier« ‘••tla«i4a iardcover 75 Ft. 7* r&. SCTBACtf f tM o - 34 rt.. OK e - 75 rt. OK ^5 - *50 rt. J5K '■•k* ase - soo rt. jok *o* - 1000 rt. jj* Un AACA -eu. A.f.HAAOCOVE* ►AorosoB — _ _ _ _ _ _ _* ^OVE, MAAOCOVEA ■—* ***^-- - - - - -J «.f TOTAL VXAIAMCZ J5 jJTHER SECTIONS [vlldiny Baiyht (ms.) gPOt str 7I.A11 X -701 34.103 34.303 34.aoa WDOOlum PCXSTPI9 PWO^C^rr>VAAIAWC^cope SCCTIClf UND OIVUIOMi A vailaaiut V i adjacant leta/parcala (• ) wa^-an/ *^^*“''**’ »»' •PPllcatlen Janua^l -------- oecapl.0 ------- ^ -------- ••parata own.,,),|^ ---------... ,, <aoe.fm ..iiciJ. 1« •la./.k... 1^ . -------- •~«...i 1,, .^. ■------ •*5*tli»9 «Ol>-eonfot»l«j LAND USE •iibjaet let la ____ vacaa* / ""'“'rt.*! -‘-tAict. ^ _______________ -ccaory b«U4i^ or u,.^•m jSTRUCTURES BtiMTIMG BVXt^iMCM 0, l^nclancloai fMWTO, ^ ~'"ir «« b.iwu. ., r. --- '*'■ Jr* ““ '»> conditional •""-oofiianalj,, «ae “‘r ""‘7 ■-"•■—«........ ------ZL^£f^ TAOTCUAE Wll taxes & assessments ^*®^**TT £D. Sir~“ r~* ‘—■—— '• eerront ——> fnel y*rd dtjMA.ioe — I. •»'• not laaall. ____ - •'• MUllCAmrr te^aar '***‘"“^ »•« Purpo.aa. unlta (no)wilto exhibit 5 Use District L R - CITY OF ORONO LAND USE PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS exhibit 6Page 1 u cqp t stcTicm prepared FOR: riannlng Comaiaaion Maatin9 (Date) «»*uneU Maeting CiMta) _____ (Staff) tWtt kT^ i £gOt_5lCT13 ,t?l.34c application reviewed BY: TWJM. VX^XAHC* ^lAWCT ggOt SECTf Ji.CJl - AdMinistrAtor •. . «ty Attornay . City biyinaar Slannar S®**(**® Adniniatratot Slanniny Cowalaaloti Sart C0aa.laaio„ Public Worka Cbordinator Safaty Diractor rinanca Diractor Building Inapactor — - **Ptlc Inspector . Hennepin Ctya DOT ► Hlmia 8tat« DOT Hinn. OMII NCWD LNO) M.102 14.201 14.102 14.202 special comments i<>T f 4, cgpc SCCTICTf A1 , ^ X. --------JQA ai £-------f\rt-r - • vjia ------ ••patat. o-naraMp P-real. n«t in thla appUc.r,^ --------- rolllj»f Mil. ct>nfk«ci*d STAFF RECOMMENDATION SBWWV* application aa aub.itt«l •nrr application for ig4™ r> Xi|uiri s II ip Ipifiliitiirari|| § s;i Clm n>r t. T 77 «' ------ III-' s|lii>^5s o He/)ro b 0 2 O) ^roro ro X X* y X K X X 8SKS5iK8 c/5cv> p S 8 00 00 OD X* X x" X X X* X* KSSKSISS cn H >2 Cis D « « « « « ^ X X X X X X s8 » IS3 ts9 ro ro4^ ^ X X X X ^ ro rj rooqa^ X K lO C/) Rrrcn ro fo ro ro ro ro or ex O' O' ^ X X X X X X CO fo ro *o ro 00 o 00 O' ^ to ro ^ ro fo to ro ro O 00 OD OC CD QO« « « X X X X X X ro ^ M ro ro ro to o CD ro U9 CO Ud W CO ^ to to ro o o o X X X X X X ro ro ro ro ro ro on -s^ oo Q. 3 to 5 c#r* O ^ ^2L < :i- CL =c.s c o c in <2'P;^23§3 k|l?-32-,l!, ‘^'S = 3 <? ;; a C 5' 2 5 < Q iS E S^O'oS.g — 32 fc 5 <? S|^Sl3* 2 <c 'o ^ ^ (ft— 5 CO. 5^0 ?.«! 3 — O ® ^N< « c " § N2 u' £ — §,S 5 s-s. « CO •< 1 1 • ■ *.V I TO: FROM: Planning Conmiission Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE:April 30, 1981 SUBJECT:#612 A.H. Evans and Loren Klitzke, 575 Oxford Rd. vacation of a portion of a flowage easement over the designated wetland The application involves a request by the owner of Lot 2, Klitzke Addition, to release a portion of the flowage ease ment judged not to be involved in the wetlands. In the or- l9inal plat^ Strelow addtion, the wetlands was incorrectly judged to involve a more extensive area on the property. Staff member involved with the review of the Stielow plat recall that the majority of field work was done during the winter months. has restaked the wetland area for the surveyor. The enclosed information reflects those changes. The enclosed legal description and survey describe only the changes requested for Lot 2. I note that the application form and title heading on legal description refer to" both Lots 1 and 2. If the application involves both lots before a public hearing is scheduled, staff will require a legal description for that portion of the wetlands to'be rslfeased for Lot 1* and a revised survey. ii! t: tzke, 575 Oxford Rd. - 3wage oaseneri't over le owner of Lot 2, >f the flowage ease~ ttlands. In the or— ids was incorrectly on the property. the Stielow plat as done during the r the surveyor. The ?es. 7 describe only the t the application form sfer to both Lots 1 .ore a public hearing description for that >r Lot 1' and a revised Cn-Y OF ORONO, MINKEf-O. . Land Use Application • LOCATICW OF PROPOSAL (or property) 555 and 575 Oxford Road Address Orono. Minnesota______________ Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, XicgaX Description Klitzke Addition______ A. H. Evans and APPLICANT Name Loren 0. Klitzke Tel #330-3004 Mailing c/o Jeffrey L. Watson, 1500 Midwest Plaza Address Building, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 A. H. Evans and OWNER Name Loren J. Klitzke________ Mailing 815 Partenwood Road Address Long Lake. Minnesota 55356 Tel #542-8111 TYPE OF APPLICATION _ Sketch Plan Review $5( Subdivision $150 + $10/Lot _ Conditional Use Permit ___ $30.00 ___ $50.00 __ Rezoning $250 _ Vacation $100 (Minimur FEE /d Date Rec*d ’ Y - ^9 ~ By .1^ Present Zoning Present Use Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request Specify Ordinance Requirements_______________ Explain your request and reasons for same AMU"UiilfcK ^ explain proposed use of property in detail V/ lawn and other grnund«i inrirfpntal tn cinglo fAnily dwe11inos_.------------------------------ MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) 1. Application completed 2. Plat map section 3. Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of prox^osal 4. Construction plans, if applicable 5. Certified Property Owner's list owners within (300*) (150*)- fr Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center 6. Stamped, legal sized envelopes{ pre-addressed to each of the na on the above list. A. D.yfVANS. / , LOREN J. KL1TZ> Applicant's Signature J.DATE April 29, 1981 DATE April 29, 1981________o.'ner*s Signature ® Applicant heroljy agrees to provide all inforn^e^o LOREN 0. KLIT2I quired or requested b TYPE OF APPLICATION __ Sketch Plan Review $5( Subdivision §150 + $10/Lot __ Conditional Use Permit ___ §30.00 ___ §50.00 __ Rezoning §250 ___ Vacation §100 (Minimur EE /OQ /<3 ate Rec*d y f •w**’ ^ar JVRZ9B6I Her, explain No. of Lots f property in detail llinas^ APPLICATION tmnission meeting) as nV,v- M — W \ J.A*„fg .^*00 • KLITZKE ITION msrnMt Mm 0mtrrmi mmutmmt Ut-a *.•<#/» Ar« ./•' *mm.*t*rr*.* • AW* jiMbBw^ <%■«* O^'(Jh % T ' ♦-*•‘ I —— w*» m r%f - tmrrn^, * <«,# Jrjf am .ww. .V .* !•''••• t (* w 4MSS4 ¥9*^ ♦* 0 r m “ • . »*m ‘Mr. ,# w*M r, ai • er*#.V.- <• JU, ■ $ fi iM 9tg #C «#-• >• • » . -2 t N*' / A STiOi • *»•# / A jcfi/ /<v /-^/r JM» «i# EG4 BEA DEI Kf 0k> ill nf' l> th« SOU orparriol, fW id s. Bix) I.: A|Sw'IM» loff”! J. < Thd pirf jl Id file cr d rtiLrU Also lo 4. aio lh» n/t ^^lMv4 fUv^t« s^^ llu SJr am ?nri"t*rls o. am ics c^jr.v ralt ’ si. tfit'si {?r ‘St! ^ i:rfn j SIAIi 14 MV.fSO C ^UM'< Of Hi;*.\i P SKI: Cf MNv‘>0; CO jMY C; C<'^^ rv Bji;iefS. snu cv v.iv.tso C'X .Mt iV KV.iF Irc.. i f.*!''r>PSiiar I !-!J l’'*r»s irc C‘"vX^’, C'N' ll V JPS • i %TA t: :> LOUM^ Cf Mi'fO. It 05 Au. .v;v,iS0i T*'.S f!ld' d KliT.'/ fiv\ t nr'. 0*1 I "•€rfti* r< i1i*v *• Cilr' *111'.______.i.v •'•*f'*on I. *i ^ ‘ O'VI iV. V: T -ifd i 1. EaO:. ’jr TIT I (•»;, ?. Lfan‘ P*j ('XiNT ;?fc0«>f:ft I (• rtify Ihi k Ojf CafK:^, ( led Property Owner's list within (300') (150*)- £r ►in Co. Dep»t. of Finance Government Center ‘d, legal sized envelopes! Idresscd to each of the na t above list. LOREN J. KLITZV LOREN irkllTZi juired or requested b orney. Planning Conmis*; io » .tnd further agrees to .on ' w.. i‘3„Of.L0oi VI •-- i>V/7 rAOAMfffi \Z______ m s/z f o f * *1 j-LXi s>rs:?;4 is*:ili 546fk£j7 TO BE IKE ADDITION )ITION described line of said Lot 5ast corner of 21 seconds East, .ot 2 a distance ites 01 seconds 10 degrees 40 min- to the most legrees 45 minutes of said Lot 2, a ^s 11 minutes 50 South 7 degrees 10 feet; thence distance of 79.43 : i - 7 . ' ^ " Vv/l^lf ... 'll ' 11 ^ f-PH29mi ■ a ;; I m 4k > t'..* • • * ■ •• 15 ’ Ct tr b5 — t# i IMIS I.NOUilURt, made and enlercd into this /\J^' dai _____. 1978, bjf and between lynn L. Charlson and Bcr/I 1. CharUon, husband and wife, their heirs, assigns, successors (hereinafter co11ecU«1> re ferred to as the "Grantors"), and the Ciljr of Omno. a riunicipal corpora«ion under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Us successors and assigns, (hereinaiter re ferred to as the "Grantee"). vnU'CSSEIH. Grantors, for and in consideration of the su««f D'le (tollar (S).OO) and other valuable consideration, herebjr covenant, grant, gift, quit claim and convey to Grantee the right to restrict and Grantors agr« lo limit and preclude the use, inprovement and develop^'^nt, under the conditions and covenants herein contained, the folloi^ing described land In the Cou.«f of Hennepin and State of Minnesota: See (khibit A attached hereto for legal description. as follows: 1) Grantors reserve for the benefit of the owners and occupants of lots 1, 3, 4 and S, Block 1, Stielow's Addition, a 10-foot wide waUim^ ease ment to.lake Mir.nctonia over and across each of lots 1, 3, 4 and S, Blocft |, Stielow*s Addition, together with the right to raintain and repair said walkway easewnt. Grantors further reserve for the benefit of the owners and occupants of lots 1. 3, 4 and S. Block 1, Stielow's Addition, the right to construe, wjin^ tain, repair and use a smgle-familjf residential dock on each of lots 1. 3, 4 and S, Block 1, Stielow's Addition. « 2) Subject to the rights’ reserved in faragraph 1 hereof. Grantors hereby covenant and agree: a) ho structures shall be constructed, erected, or placed upon, a above, or benrath the land including without limlUlion, femes, fireplaces, steps, hard-cover or mads of aar nature wSitioe«er or* • an/ iti'** structure or i.Tproiff ent inconsistent »ith tr*e natural stale of the land. ^ •• »•••• «n for.r.tiis DtPL % .-r Exliibi t • • M .J ■ • ___♦ {■r^ n •i. rycUlion shall be destroyed. iS aulhoriifd bjr Mrittcn 1. soil or inj other natiiril 6 or removed fro* the lend ■civition of injr nature whaUo« f of the land Mithout the her substance or material as ft stored upon the land and placed, dunoed or stored land except uses* if aiv, natural condition of the land, 9e the drainage, flood control, soil conservation, fish and ill be made of the land or the and for the purposes of >vpnants contained herein and f without anjf liability any sees, or unnatural matter laincd herein and the natural It claim and convey to Crantee, se to trespass with water o«er k, release, acquit and forever its officers and rrplojeei of • • • M* « 1 ' V' X ** “ft- ~r^r /•; •• •» -.n' . }i « ••a ■ ■ ijv'l • •••# •. .: V • jji ' • Ar*-* < #€-4 .« <r„ ^ “•■’7: ........ >' •' n-,- ~ „„ W*t«r within terns of these apreen^ntl. In addition to any other ren^dy the Crantee nay .-ave. the «..enants and restrictions conta.ned herein eny he enforced hy injunction. ' ^tors do not intend that the oublie .. . . . . . . ni the above land py virtue of ihn ^- - --— ■ ------------------ ot^n'-wtv. ..............., hereinaboee set forth. —------------—------------------- The Grantors herein certify that the land herein described i, . . . . . . . . . . . .. _ Of record* If any. .. . M . *" .. . . . . . .. ™ "* respective parties hereto. ’ —^^iv9v?S:^-cr>-^ suit or micitsoiAi ) SS;couNir or hihmpih ) On Ihis-^^'^ ^SltC within and for saidToS^ly '-----’ ^ * notary Wryi w. Charlson. husband and wUe tl'^l'nn and sworn did say that they .re the injiviSuri.'^r'^*-‘''*® **'"9 duiy Is s* <ow#.nr IHIS JnSIf^UiUf^^ Bf; St.lfN t SAIA7AR. tto. Attorneys at law 7??? Xerftfs Avenue South Suite 1401 Minneapolis, rji SS431 JOHRCNS DLPr. V f y ( •use* of tctlofl of any kind or nature Iriue of any flowage or tr.rspa** with "<-<»y the Grantee «iy ha»e, the n n»y be enforced by injunction. _the public should have any Interett ure or otherwise, eicept a* tiereinabore that the land herein described Is •seaenls. restriction* and reserration* run with the land and shall e.tend titives. 9r«nteci or of the triiriioii —:------• *>P^Off ne a notary r api-aicd lynn.l. Charlsnn and^ rrsonally known who being duly act and deed. • rjr PuFhe -----hoirfjrl* i f 4.1 ! ♦% t* • * •• 4 * • • • * .I ^ • • . •••• • '•••••••*■ *. .• * •* *• • •• • , • • *• ‘.n'a* ^ • —I • • . ... J, •*n ’ ‘ ••. ‘H . 'I ■ 1 ■ * * 1fc.>> • * »Vt . . f •• • • M a If!ilj;T *A* Outlet A, StIeloMS Addition '®* ’• ’• ''T’Minri lying wrsterly of the following Jrscrlbrd line: Co—nneing at the rortSrast cor. **'".i*^ thence on an .«ssu-<cd tearing of "orth .I? danreet . J? iniites IS seconds rest, along the .’ortherly line of said tot I. a distance of J0|.9f feet; thence r.’orth 33 lerrees SI ninules 11 seconds i.est. along Slid Vortherly line of tot 1. a distance of lorthfj Icgrees a; ninutes IS s'conts 'lest, along * '"»»i'>ce of ?0;.Z1 fret to the point of beginning of the line to ►» dtscrtsrd; thence South 3 degrees II ninutes iz seconds I.est to the shore of lake 'lini.clonka and there ternlnatlng. ’• •"’'Iir** lying I'csterly of the foltoilrg described tine; trginninn at a point in the Southerly line * VI.31 leM •estcrly of the SPutVas/corwr of sai lotS; t lence *orth 1| degrees 13 ninutes OS seconds '>st ?11 1? feet to the lorlhcrly line of said lot 3 or its erteusUn an^ UrnlLtVno for purposes of t'lis descriptinn. the Snutherly tine of said lot 3 Is * • assured to bear »:orlh .?0 degrees 1? ninules 37 seconds Vest. • All ttot part "f lot I. riocV. 1. Smi?*.;S A'-'ITIO*:. tying Vesterly of the .ollouing cscri.ed line: Ceginning at a point in the -ortherly line of If ?.l5 I ^ ’■ '-•* ■ »' •‘‘•S “orlhe.st cornerof Slid lot I; thence South 2', degrees M ninutes 10 seconds Test 770 30 fret, to the Southerly line o* said lot C and there iJI^tnaJln" Vor il purposes of this drscriptIon the 'ortherly line of said lot I Is assuned' to bear forth 17 degrees 1? ninutes 37 seconds Vest. .III thil part of l"t 5. ’■loci 1. STI'irf .1-«->lM7d. lytnn "estrrly of the ^idV^Vi”'^ r'*n! '"uthcrly fine of* therein distant 3«S.7f feet V»s:“r1y nf the Southeast corner Of illd l.ot 5; throes "ort*! 7? ic^rf^rs 17 ninutes OJ s«*con1s •’sst m dit. lance of "''.^ffoet; thence ->rt? 13 -e-mesaJO niiuUs li secoJ^s -elt: « .is.ance of 13j .03 .ret to -‘orthcriy 1 In? of said lot S and there for ntirpo'-cs of IMs drscrlptlnn, the Soulhrrl/ Mne of said lot S Is assured to hear forth 37 dcjrccs 11 ninutes ?l seconds t>sl. * IfiilRCfiS DIPT. t- I ' !i‘ • h* • w m m m • m i r V • * *5 4 m ■ I MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF APRIL 5, 1981 The meetin9 was called to order at 7:30 PM. Those present from the City Council were Norman Paurus, Mary Butler« and Gregg Hannah. Those present from the Planning Commission were John Haromerel, Gloria McDonald, Tom Frahm, Diann Goetten, and George Revegno. Those present from the City Staff were Alan Olson, Tom Jacobs, and Jeanne Mabusth. 7:40 PM Jo Ellen Hurr from the City Council arrived. ATTENDANCE 7:30 PM Alan Olson reviewed the status of comprehensive plan review by the Metropolitan Council. The City has received a letter stating that the review is in pro gress and is expected to be completed sometime before June 26, 1981. The City will then have at least two weeks to review the staff comments before our plan tevxewed by the Metro Councils Physical Development Committee. Alan Olson briefly reviewed the status of the recodi fication progreun for the Municipal Code and explain ed again for the Planning Commission that recodifi- oation was a reorganization of our existing code, and it did not in itself refer to any ordinance changes. However, during that process, we fully intended to make any necessary substantive changes to the ordinances, particularly the zoning ordinances which we were re viewing tonight. Any zoning ordinance changes would be adopted at the time of recodification but would be first reviewed at public hearings, as required by law. Agenda item number three was discussed as far as format for reviewing the zoning ordinance revisions. Topics discussed included suggested changes to regul ations regarding fences, accessory buildings, and land alteration projects. Items regarding guest houses, and suggested changes in setback standards were not discussed at this meeting. This meeting's purpose was to be a work session round « table discussion on all sides of each issue. No action was taken on any topic. Staff will respond to this meeting by incorporating suggestions into actual draft ordinances, and by preparing .idditional topics for dis cussion at future joint meetings. / / /The special meeting adjovrnrted approximately 9:30 PM. wirii2un B. Van Nest Mayor i ADJOURNMENT 9:30 PM Walter R. Benson City Administrator TO:Dick Benson, City Administrator City Council Planning Conosission FROM:Alan P. Olson, City Planner DATE:March 25, 1981 SUBJECT:Ordinance Revisions - Fences Existing Regulations 1.Sections 31.433 and 31.434 permit certain fences and walls (along with other items) as "non-encroachments" into required yard areas. No setback is required. 31.433 permits fences not over 3-1/2 ft. high in any yard, or fences not over 6 ft. high along the front lot of the lake frontage lots abutting a major thoroughfare 31.434 permits fences and walls not over 6 ft. above grade in any aide or rear yard. Sections 35.047, 35.282, 35.357 & 35.446 require 6 ft. fencing (or natural screening) in B-1, B-3, B-4 & B-5 zones abutting residential property. Sections 35.501 6 35.551 . squire 6 ft. fences or walls (or landscaping) between gas stations or driveins and residential property. Section 37.100 defines required screening as a solid fence or wall at least 50% opaque. Natural plantings are "in addition to" required fencing. The State Building Code Section 301^2 does not require a building permit for fences 6 ft. high or less. Issues 1. Fences are permitted in lakeshore yards which may adversely affect views. Staff interprets lakeshore yards as "front yards, thereby^ limiting the height to 3-1/2 ft., but this is not clearly written in the ordinance. I •Ij 4 l: I MyI 9r t ^ / 9 / 3. 3. Solid Walla are permitted the same aa fencea. There ia no distinction bet%reen above ground walla and retaining walls. 4.Certain definitions are lacking, such as "wall", where height ia measured, "major thoroughfare”, etc. 5.Screening should be primarily natural material with fences used as secondary screening, not vice-versa. 6.There is no provision for swimming pool or other security fencing. 7.There is no prohibition against hazardous fences like barbed wire or electric fences. 8. Iliere is no differentiation between the needs of urban and rural neighborhoods. 9.Ordinances should protect against typical complaints (view blockage, spite fences) yet permit maximum flexibility to preserve privacy and to keep public involvement to a minimum. 10.Ordinances should cover "grey areas" with necessary definitions, prohibitions, permissions, etc. 11. Ordinance should be as simple as possible. Ordinance Suggestions 1.Create a separate section to regulate fences, freestanding walls and retaining walls (take these items out of the "non encroachments" section). 2.Make natural planting the primary screening material with fences to be used only in peurticular circumstances, or in addition to natural materials; perhaps by conditional use permits. 3.Regulate permanent "walls" and obtrusive solid or opaque "fencea* more stringently than open fences. 4. 5. Require swimming pool fencing. Prohibit hazardous fencing in urban areas, yet allow barbed wire or electric fencing where horses are permitted in the rural areas. 6.Establish a "fence permit" system to require staff review prior to construction. This may apply to all fences or, preferably, only to solid fences, walls, or fences over 3-1/2 ft. high. -2- 1 . i Planner*s Detailed Suqqeitiona Lakeshore Yards a) b) Prohibit solid fences or walls of any height Allow retaining walls by conditional use permit when necessary to control erosion but limit height and require screening. (Allow staff to approve such walls without conditional ise pernut review in emergency situations whore slippage is occurring or has occurred). ^ c) Allow open design, max. 42" high fences if located 75 feet or more from the shoreline. d) Allow open design, maximum 42" high fences along side property only^if^^^ closer than 10 ft. from the highwater elevation, 1) adjacent property owner agrees in writing; or 2) Council approves a conditional use permit OPTION; prohibit all fencing without a variance. Hardships would If not impossible to prove, hence variances unixKely. Prohibition may be overly restrictive if neighbors approve as in (d) above. Urban Front (Street) Yards a) Prohibit solid fence'sjor walls over 24" high b) Allow open design, maximum 42" high fences fences by conditional use permit only on lakeshore lots fronting on county roads or designated City streets (such as Casco Point Road ). Limit depth along side property lines. 0PTI0N2_ prohibit all fencing except by conditional use permit Urban Side or Rear Yards ciCa) b) Allow open design, maximum 42" high fences Allow solid fences and/or fences up to 6 ft. high only if: 1) adjacent property owner agrees in writing; or 2) Council approves a conditional use permit -3- Rural Yarda i)Allow opon dasign, ■axlmn 42* high fancas Allow opan daaign, aaximiB 6 Pt. high fancaa of wood, barbed single abrand alactric wire around pastures and paddocks actively used for agriculture or the keeping of compliance with other zoning regulations. Miniroun lot sise is three acres. Allow solid fences and/or fences up to 6 Pt. high in side or rear yards only ifi 1) adjacent property owner agrees in writing; or 2) Council approves a conditional use oerwit« Other Fences & Walls Allow retaining walls by staff permit, except by conditional use permit if within 75 Ft. of lakeshore. Set maximum height 4^, or fences higher than permitted - staff permit if located to meet required building setbacks. Example: tennis court fences must meet setbaoks. c) d) Require at least 42" high security fences around swimming pools. ^**'?*^ fencing within setback areas regardless of height. Define kennel as a confined area for keeping 1 or more dogs. non-residential fencing similar to above, with setbacks and screening around storage area. Approvals waiving Council review if the written consent is provided. -4. / V s' r TO:Dick B«n«on, City kd«ini»tr«tor Mel Rilbo, Chief of Police FROM:Alan Oleon, City Planner DATE: SUBJECT: April 29, 1981 Hound Pire Depar Mound Fire Department has taken delivery of the new 100 ft. aerial tower fire truck. » ration Droorea for City officials is planned for 7:00 P.M., TumSSJ! M.y 2«, IMl. «>• Station, two block, south Of county Road 15 on Milshire Boulevard. orono Council members and any interested staff are especially iS5i«?a^dinn. irf hSuh^' anS’' Spring Park are also invited for that evening. If someone has a conflict for that date, they are always welcona to come by the Fire Station any Saturday morning. OvT.iKft ar P»» sv t»T Hojtr OinL -j^ jr P»f«'•'X 9 ----------- f KI5TM/6 D» 'Vl W*9 Lim.44 W x L*no \'wr Cttuf'-f o g% r^t)Pu«<'0 Wg</«e ■■ ■, :-•. f? '- " •' VV't.M.V,- < • i .. V. .,^. . ■'.■» , / ' '' / / ■' N .S'* /\t*t \ \ \ I m^ik. . b It .V ■ . CtofVsT.3** ^18.U> . =w* l<m,f^8t Lo- t \ \ ,jw- . ■ri v:.v-\ ". iO ^ ■ * ' ■ . ■* •- ■ ,x p 4 5 Ao^».m- i4i0 Ri^rPotHj H . » - r- ^ . Vj . •;■' ■' •". ':Ji^ ‘ A»9u ‘r*^i9v ^^07 \ *':. ^ rf.-, ' *i .c I ■ ^ 5y • « Jij , ^ •'‘■--‘’.fe •1 r 'iSHk- *•!». i4-4 - /vX) ■I* ■l!- .,1 N #307 M V*^-;;'::sj-«t.. * 'w-' ^ T { imO<.'^— '^t ^. f V A -r > o »N.' litSfts.^c «’e*L «r .#. ^ s*'.'- ^‘. - " a---^ •et’- ^ .-» * ?r < V «fi