HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-06-1982 Planning PacketPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 P.M.
MONDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1982
*A8terick Items are considered to be routine Items to be enacted upon
by one motion by the Planning Commission under Consent Item* on the
agenda. Discussion will be held upon request.
Council Representative - Mayor Brad Van Nest
Call to Order
1. Call to order/roll
Consent Agenda
2. Approval of Consent Items*
Public Hearings
3. 7:30 P.M. Daniel McPherson, 2225 Sixth Ave. No. - Preliminary Subdivision
Action
*4. #556 Richard Hawklnson, 4265 West Branch Rd. -Final Subdivision
RESOLUTION
*5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
#671 Schlee Builders, 3660 Shoreline Dr. > Final Subdlvislon-RESOLUTION |
#715 Victor E. Norton, 3580 Bayslde Road - Preliminary Subdivision
#719 Thomas E. McCue, 3285 Crystal Bay Rd. > Variance
#720 Doug deMallgnon, 925 So. Willow Drive - Variance
Ordinance - Changing the Zoning District Desimatln and Performance
ilaiStandards applied to Big Island, Mahpitata Island and Deering Island
Work Session
i *
10. #718 Thomas Crosby, 745 Spring Hill Road - Preliminary Subdivision
Information Items
11. Planning Commission representative to attend Cc^cil meeting of
December 13, 1982 is Edward Callahan.
12. Select Planning Commission representative for Council meeting of
, 1983.January 10
13. Building Official's memo on Ab^mdoment of Flammable or Combustible
Liquid Tanks.
Approval of Minutes
14. Approval of Planning Consnisslon minutes of November 15, 1982.
a
VILLAlGEOFOMNO
M«i
■1^?
«
\
MiUMi f ll«.it
i f
; -i
T’t''
Mitsl■^, f' ► ■
‘■h.E
Ik. L
' • ■ ■ Vil
>■ '5
TO;
FROM:
Planning Commission
Jeanne A. Mabusth
DATE:December 1, 1982
SUBJECT: #713 Dailel G. McPherson, 2225 County Road 6
Preliminary Subdivision
LVA*-*:-
Zoning District - RR-IB
Area - approximately 35 acres
Application • Subdivision - metes and bounds lot line rearrangement
. Planning Commission Action * Public Hearing - Recommendation of
preliminary approval.
4
The certificate of survey submitted for the work session must be revised
prior to final subdivision approval by Council. Review exhibit B. In
dealing with lengthy, cximbersome metes and bounds descriptions, it Is
much simpler for reference and resolution drafting if the parcels can be
so designated. In addition, signature lines for all parties with Interest
in property, Orono Mayor and City Clerk must be provided.
Our previous discussion did not deal with the existing shed/barn's setback
from proposed property lines. The public record must clarify for all future
owners of McPherson's homestead lot that the shed/barn located on parcel B
may not be used for the keeping of animals as it lacks the required 150' set
back.
The survey also shows designated right of way widths for both Willow Drive
and County Road #6. The City will require a quit claim deed for the 33' of
right of way for Willow Drive. The County will require a quit claim deed
for the 40' of right of way for County Road #6.
Staff Recommendation
To recommend final approval of the metes and bounds division of Lewis Cox'sIPP _ _ --
property located at 2225 Sixth Avenue North per the certificate of survey
dated October 18, 1982 subject to the following conditions:
1. Final resolution approving subdivision must specify that the
existing shed/bam on Parcel B cannot be used for the keeping
of animals.
2. a) Quit claim deed to the City of 33' of right of way for
Willow Drive.
b) Quit claim deed to Hennepin County of 40' of right of
way for County Road #6.
3. Revised certificate of survey to include the following:
a) Numerical or Alphabetical designation for each
parcel
b) Signature lines for all parties with interest in the
property, Orono Mayor, City Clerk.
J o
•I
IM:‘I'i
I >
SS
aI
8
I?zzs»
r* I- ^
"•"8-
ffsis?
3 VI
81^
!S38
IW
if II! !• ^
M Z * S M»iiiS
s ll* t 1*1
•*
■» I
Pt
M
?
lii|liiiSs8’illi
l®|i iMi i*i!
Hi;l!SSSSl'^S M E m
S85S
tfZ tfA
8*S jS
c*:: ?
:^88S8
5S8
jgS ?g«
^ vl
liii*11
8*“
8 *1 « *1 S
moo
M
I
?M
Vi
8
I
, «
3»lii 3
*5g|.*2
i w C ^ W fM m ffi fs> oi8SS8
VI VlUt Mig»8 ro»^5
i s
m
$ 2 8
8*“ x"*
8
O M »
M
5^
i
i
3§88f
Mr
M
Mrrv
VI
8
I
M
IM
M
OiI
MVi
Oo
M
^ ^ r«l ffl Oo ® s J:XI M :a XI
§z z
^ M m m
f
ssss
i
8
M
M
01•
M
Oi
Vi
INI
VI
Ooo
M
Q M n n o uZ M f ► M 5 Q ^ M Z MZ o 2 r* ^O _ o MiSi: 2
M C M
SP?
JH i: X VI r- IV^ 2 ^ 9Vi z r* III 2
txZiaK
^ ^ z
‘I
* A
J 3
EXHIBIT
> z
m X
gMOfI
. VI ^ VI fn ni
i|ii
3gg§
I
M
8^
Oi f-
83
Ms
|3
iSii
I
I
VI
a
?r«
VI
a
i z o o z
M
Hs*Z IV z zSIS_ z #v___SS'"'" r s3«*^
* **s=
8 ii<: 8 8
Zz
iSif•I 0 r- ►
5
z iiMi!ggxr-
8^58
rM
M> M X
**£|„*si
?
Z x^aaiirZ z 1- f“ zVi
a .*sss;
z
Oi
8 1 i P {
E8S888
i
3?8
a* *»--rgq
*\W.
M
-I
. . .
' V m
• C--
^MMII M/M/tt
ytCN mI
HOMvm cnm wowit wrmwnm tmm
MiomTV OMcm utr
rAXMTIi
^TAmvn
PM^ MNM
A TAXPAVn
NMK/AOM
> oMoi wm
TAXFAYCV
NMi/AOM
OUNCR HAM
TAXPAYIff
HAm/AOM
PROP AOCNI
OUNiff NAHI
TAXPAYIff
lUm/AOQff
u t7-nt«n n liii
•tlM 4YM AVt N
OANIIL • HCfNIRtQN
ffANtIL • WCPmUlOM
tUi ffYN AVt N
tONi UKt m IS3S4
U lY-lU-tS n N#7
C I VAN nCRNOUr
C I VAN itCKNCXir
liiM MAYSAYA fftVP fflfflV
MAYXAYA HN iiin
3S U tool
Umt COK ITAL
UMIS COX
mi COUNTY ffO 0
iONI UKt MN mSO
SO t7*U0-tS U tool
OlOtO MStUM Off N
JAt«S A COX tYAL
JANOS A COK
lOtO N MUUM Off
Si t7*no-ts ss
00000 NIUON Off N
PON PITYSO
PNtUSP N PtYTlO
000 N MSiUffi iff
iONi URI in WSSO
Si t7-lli-ts SI 0001
DONNA r PffOOYY tY At
YNt tYNAN COffP
001 S NXtUM Off
lONO UKt NN nSSO
M t7*n«-ts SI MM
MtM «TN AVK N
PAUL • miLLZn ITAl
PAUL • PNIIUPS
UM AIM AVt N
UMt lAKt m BSSM
3$ t7-lia-» SI tOM
CMA L eCKSIPOH
PAUL R PHILLIPS
tlAO ATM AVt N
UMB LAKt HN SSSM
M t7-llA<tS St Mtt
A
lARL R ENGAN
EARL R ENCAN
Ml M LINDEN
FERSUS FALLS fW MSS7
SS t7-llS>tS St ORM
Ottts AIM AVt H
LEMS COX LTAL
LEMS A COX
tttS COUNTY RO A
LONS LAKE HN SSMA
SS C7-nS-tS ss SMS
D B COX A 0 N COK
OONALO S A DONNA H COK
BISS EMERALD LANt
HOUMA HN BB3AA
3A t7-llS-CS SA SOSl
SOStS BROWI RO N
LVLt P COX A MFE
LYLE P COX
StS N BROUN RO
UMB LAKE HN BSSSA
m
;Vi
PIASBMl
SB C7-llB-tS SI DBM
StlSB ATM AVE N
RICHARD C VALnON ET AL
RICHARD A DALLY VAIXTON
IONS LAKE HN BSSM
SB t7-IIB-tS SI BBM
ORONO HOOOIAMDB INC
y 71 S
tlOO OYN AVC N
UM UKt NN SSSfO
Si t7-lli-tS St 0000
01100 NULON Off N
CAUL Q MICKS tTAt
CLlttOffO A NXLiSYffON
1100 MUUM Off N
QffONO NN SSSiO
Si t7-lli-tS SS Oiii
PAH PtYTli
PHILUP N PtYTli
000 N MXLION Off
UM UKt NN SSSIO
Si f7-lli-ts ss iOOO
00000 NTLim Off N
ffOiCffT K KffXtitff
PXffSY NATt DANK OP NPli
YffUST out tSYAYS OXV
P 0 OQK A-700
Si t7-iii-ts so iiit
OOOIS OffOMN ffO N
YNONAS H UNt A MIPI
YNOHAS M UNK
UM UKt NN SSSSO
i'
IN COUNTY WWPWTY INFORNATION SYtTEH
IMPCNTY 0UNCII8 UiT
•CraiT NO. PlOliMI
0A6I 8
MfCN
M 87-Ili-il M im Si 8i-Ili-8S 4S Hit Si ti-lli-is ii Mil
ouNn mm 11 rxno i Nire
TAXMYU 810 mown
iTf N mam m
moRxac c Ncorumi
KCVXN i NANKINSQN
UtS UXLLOH 00 N
OOQNO IM iiSii
OOQNO CINlfO MIOmTXCt
OOONO CtHTIO OOOPCOTXIf
4XS0 NAY2ATA OLVO
NPLf m ffili
■,’h’ ^ ‘ -
.
i-y. ■
W&m 'm
K:.‘ ■:
pP^' ■tiS
I CtOTXrV TNAT INC TACTS OimSiNTEO AOt AN ACCUOATl AM TOUC
OtORXSCNTATXQN OF XNFORNATXON AS XT AOfCAOS TNXS OATS ON THS OICOOOS
OF THC NENNCPXN COUNTY OCPARTHCNT OF POOPCOTY TAXATION* TO TNC SIST
or NY KNONU06I AND BfLXCF.
i;'?'..'.I j
i-
'■-m
f-
TO:Planning Commission
i f;. fv t'li
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth
DATE:December 1982
SUBJECT:1556 Richard Hawkinson, 4625 West Branch Road
Final Subdivision - Resolution
It has been over two years since Hawkinson received preliminary
approval from Council. It has taken him this long to clear
all title and boundary line disputes. The Torens action is
now completed as are all conditions and final submittals
required for final approval of the plat. West Branch Hill.
Staff recosmends approval of the plat. West Branch Hill subject
to the findings and conditions setforth in the enclosed
resolution.
Mr ' K
N
.XM I?'.’-
i
!i
.i \
City of ORONO
I
CITY1 ' 1 I ORONOJ
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF
WEST BRANCH HILL
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a raunicipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted
subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development
of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for
subdivision plat by Richard Hawkinson, the subdivider; and
WHEREAS, the subdivision has been approved as meeting all
standards of the RR-IB zoning district finding that each lot is of
a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family
residence to be located without the need of any setback variances; and
WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of
the platting regulations of the City, including:
1) Dedication on the plat of rights of way for a
public road, shown as County Road No. 151.
2) Dedication to the City of a Road and Utilities
Easement over the west 25 feet of Lot 2, Block 1,
West Branch Hill for future access to the south.
3) Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation
Easement providing for limitations on the use of
wetlands and/or drainageways described therein and
sho%m on the plat as "drainage easements*.
Completion of required septic testing for subdivisions
confirming that Lot 1, Block 1, West Branch Hill has
adequate, suitable soils for septic expansion and
that Lot 2, Block 1, West Branch Hill has adequate,
suitable soils for a primary septic system and for
future septic expansion.
Page 1 of 2
t.
L
if
mi
■ ■ ■
City of ORQNO
ClTYi^
■r \ *
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
5) Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in
the amount of $100.00*
6) Payment to the City for the legal review and
filing of the plat and associated documents.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Xono hereby approves the plat of WEST BRANCH HILL, Hennepin
County , »* t-inenota; subject to the following conditions:
The future owner of Lot 2, Block 1, West Branch
Hill must obtain an access permit from the
Hennepin County Highway Department prior to
construction. The existing drainage in relation
to the sizing of the culvert for the new driveway
must be reviewed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
and the City of Orono.
“5 *
The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of
Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office
on or before June 13, 1983, together with a
certified original copy of this Resolution and
executed copies of the documents noted above.
The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the
plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event,
it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono
for subdivision review.
Dated this day of
1982.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Orono December 13
ATTEST:
William B. Van Nest, Mayor
Alberta M. rtrom, City Clerk
f i Page 2 of 2
•- 4a
f ^ X
*•90
• 1
4
I
s
------Lm a’
^€<i/¥ A/0*/»'09-£ -
__'Ttc/S
• StS^OO SovsosrW^^1 I ;•'•a
V
WETLAND-
■laUdiaM—ints-
•744.00 <4O*i/yi0"tY.
r'
nt mttiH ,/Mt 0WH tfMtAmo ,esm. i m, itn
\
I GARY Li’NOGREN A 0 C-
!m
."5
i
K n Ill
=1
SfTr
'l ' Iff
?i “ '[fcifeniff i{(
5« ?s «-*!>r|»r^fi m
i
TO:Planning Commission
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth
DATE:
SUBJECT:
December 3, 1982
#671 Schlee Builders^ 3660 Shoreline Drive
Final Subdivision - Resolution
Unfortunately, the final resolution approving the plat
of Navarro will not be reviewed by the City Attorney
until Monday, December 6th, Your agenda packet will
contain only the 1" = 200* scale copy of the plat.
I will be happy to review the conditions of final
plat approval or answer any questions on the status of
improvements in the Navarre Heights area.
Council is scheduled to act on the final plat on
December 13, 1982. You are asked to vote a recommendation
of approval or denial at your meeting of December 6, 1982.
■j.f
t-f
TO:City Council
FROM:Walter R. Benson, City Administrator
DATE:November 18, 1982:
SUBJECT: #585 Schlee Builders Inc.
Final Plat Apjuroval
Schlee Builders has now completed everything necessary to receive
final plat approval on their subdivision as required by the
preliminary Resolution #1404. I recommend Council approval
of the plat on Monday, November 22, ±982.
The final plat approval resolution is being drafted now and
will be available Monday night.
Items completed by Schlee include:
1. Signed developer's agreement including assessment
appeal waiver as approved by Council 10-11-82.
2.Payment of all fees including Park Dedication Fee
($11,520 less $3871.10 in physical improvements =
$7648.90 net park fee) and fee deposits sufficient to
cover outstanding and expected administrative costs
($2,500.00).
3.Providing all required signed easements including
flowage and conservation easements over the Tonka Corp.
wetlands and temporary construction easements over
all of Schlee's property.
4. Providing a warrantee deed to the City for Outlot A.
5. Providing required letters of credit.
li
dm
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Planning Conralsslon
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
December 2, 1982
SUBJECT: #715 Victor E. Norton, 3580 Bayslde Road - Preliminary
Subdivision
Review of Application * Planning Commission tabled action on the
application on November 15, 1982 pending
further iiiq>ut from staff.
Planning Commission Action -Action on division or table based
on need to review criteria used to
deny or approve division.
I have enclosed a recent letter from Mr. Norton citing his concern
over specific Issues raised during the review of his division.
First, the Orono staff makes no determination as to the acceptability
of an application. If asked, we will advise as to the feasibility of
an application based on our experience and knowledge of previous
Council acclon. Clearly, this is not one of our usual applications.
The application involves the division of a riparian outlot
and the approving of an additional lake use unit. I know of
no other application Involving divisions of existing riparian
outlets. In the Bayslde Beach plat, an existing riparian outlot
owned in common with other contiguous lakeshore properties was
allowed to remain as an outlot for resale to another homeowner
within 2,000* radius of the outlot. The DNR retains all tax
forfeit lots that are 50' in length and 33 deep for future
public use.
We will need to review existing standards and determine what
appears reasonable. Create new criteria applicable for this
type of division - review the Comprehensive Plan specifically
the environmental section, LR~1A zoning district, IKCD codes.
For Example:
1 • If an outlot is created, the homestead lot must be
located within 200’, AOO*, 600* of outlot.
2 - The average depth of the lot must at least meet the
minimum DNR standard of 33'.
3 - Lakeshore frontage must satisfy width standard of
relative zoning district.
.'.w ^
#715 Victor Norton
Page 2
Subdivision
4 - No structures allowed on such outlets except for a lock
iV box structure not to exceed 3', 4', 5' ?? in height or
20 sf in area.
5 - Require special lot combination agreements wlten such
ownership patterns are created.
Parcel A has 400*4- of lakeshore and an average measured depth
of 70* to 80*. Parcel B has 200* of lakeshore and an average
depth of 30* to 40*. The depth of the outlot widens as you
go northward.
As for requiring a plat, the planner strongly recommends approving
a metes and bounds division for if platted there may be more
chance of pressure for residential development at some time in the
future. As for a plat being more acceptable over a metes and bounds
division because of the changing, eroding shoreline, a metes
and boiinds description would run to the existing shoreline and
the plat defines the shoreline at the 929.4 elevation. The
need to establish a fixed shoreline point does not appear an
issue for this review.
The Planning Commission should make a recommendation regarding need
to realign the lot line so that a portion of the outlot is located
directly across the street. The lots still remain legally impossible
to combine as one tax parcel. What practical reasons would
require the realignment - greater depth to north, less potential
for accidents, easier to watch over property - Planning Commission
you make a recommendation and if you ask for it how wide of a
corridor is to be required 20', 50', 100'?
If you propose to deny this application your findings should
cover some of the following criteria:
1 - Negative precedent setting.
2 - Create a hazardous condition that would be detrimental to
the public health, safety and welfare.
3 ■* If strict determination of LR-IA standard need to
approve several variances.
* r*
JAl. A U1
•oti Dflic* Bot tt*CryaUl Bay. MinncaoU 5Mil*Moni.ip»> OffuM
TtfIcpHun* 473 7il57
Victor E. Norton
3580 Bayside Road
Long Lake, Mn. 55356
Variance
Conditional Use Permit
Subdivision, Preliminary
Date of Notice 11-16-82
NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION cc;
Date of Meeting _
Votes: ^ For
Alvin T. Balqaard
3560 Bayside Road
Long Lake, Mn. 55356
Against
Planning Commission recommends the following:
Approval: As submitted
Approval: Subject to conditions noted
Approval: Additional information required before Coxincil meeting
Denial: For reasons noted
Tabled: Pending receipt of additional information from applicant
vvvv Tabled: Pending review by others, or further Planning Commission
study
_ _ _ NO action required
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS The Planning Commission nQtf>H table action
on your preliminary plan subject to staff receiving advice from the City
Attorney oonceming the question of platting the property to achieve riparian
and buildability controls. The Planning Commission has also asked that the
City Attorney address the possible need to realign the lots lines of A & B
so that portion of Parcel B eire located directly across Bayside Road. I will
advise you when your application is rescheduled before the Planning Commission
for action.
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
Planning Commission _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Council
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of
additional information. Deadline for the __ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _
meeting is _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _j or __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
for the _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ meeting.
In all cases, the application must be continued with the submittal of
requested information within_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
or the City will consider the application as formally withdrawn.
If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please
contact the Zoning Administrator.
If you desire certified copies of the official Pla.nning Cormission Minutes
they are available from the Building and Zoning Secretary ufon review
and approval by the Planning Cermission.
: I
V . E . NORTON
3530 BAYSISDE ROAD
LONG LAKE, MN 55356
26 NOV , 82
n&. JEANNE HABUSTH
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
CITY OF ORONO
P/jy. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY-, «N 55323
1 If ' <•
N0V29SS i;f
J
CIIY OF PROMO
DEAR H9. HABUSTH,
IN RESPONSE TO YOUR COMMUNICATION OF 11-16-32 REGARDING PLANNING
COMMISSION ACTION ON CONTROL NO. 715 MAY I COMMENT.
fW/ ALVIN V, BALGAARD CONTACTED ME A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO ABOUT THE
POSSIBILITY OF ADDING A PORTION OF LOT 28 TO ThE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE
ON THAT BASIS EXAMINATION OF ZONIUNG ORANGES, SURVEYS, PLAT
DESCRIPTIONS, CONSULTATION WITH YOUR OFFICE AND THE HENN . CO.
GOV, CENTER, ETC. HAVE BEEN MADE IN AN EFFORT TO MEET BALGAARDS
WISH', IT PUZZLES ME HOW THIS CAN BE SUCH A "UNI3UE" CASE.
in? iJfS SHORE LINE STIPULATION WASCHECKEO BY THE SURVEYOR
BE MORE THAN THAT, ONLY TO BE TOLD AT THE MEETING THAT
MEASUREMENTS APPLY RATHER THA/Y THE "DOG LEG"
NATURE OF THE SHORE LINE.
MINNET0NKA'.°^ remaining parcel "A" fTeSONABLE ACCESS TO LAKE
MR BALGAARD EXPLAINEDTO ME THAT HAVING THE PARCEL "B" Annrn rn
HIS PROPERTY WOULD INCREASE US VALUE. HE IS NOT^A lIn E IN^THAT A3SESSM
E«r. THE TAXES ON LOT 28 HAVE GONE IP 283% AoSESSU
SINCE HE BEOAN NEGOTIATIONS. I HOPE THE PLANNING
COMMISSION CAN FIND SOME WAY'^GRANT HISWISH .
VERY TRULY YOURS,
I /
V.p. NORTON
f
i-i-
TO;Planning Commission
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth
DATE:December 3, 1982
;SUBJECT: ,4*#719 Thomas E. McCue
Zoning District - LR-IC
Area - 21,720 s£
Application - setback variance from accessory structure
Per Ordinance 31.370 required » 10'
proposed » 7.2'
variance « 2.8' or 28%
The applicant is a new owner of the subject property and plans
to construct a 7.5'+ 30' addition to the rear of house. Given
the interior floor plan the rear extension is the only feasible
way to expand. McCue's position is that a jog in that addition
ruin the exterior design, specifically the roof line and
the proposed interior design. The garage, built in 1969, was
located at the required minimum setback of 10' preventing any
complete rear extension in the future.
T1»e intent of Ordinance 31.370 is not merely to provide easy
access for emergency vehicles to service principal structures
but as its title suggests to provide the desired level of open
space for residential development.
Get out on the site. Access is acheived via an alley along the
railroad. Hardcover is no problem; the lot is larger than
neighboring lots. Hardcover is clustered to rear of lot.
If approved, your finding may include the following:
1 - Exterior and interior design of house would be
sacrificed if minimum standard of code is required.
2 “ Garage located on site so that a con^lete rear
addition would require a setback variance.
3 ~ Satisfactory area surrounds principal structure
for emergency vehicles to service.
4 - Hardcover clustered to rear of lot providing sufficient
open space.
If denied refer to Ordinance 32.340 for required findings.
1
r UND USE PLANNING
ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION
EXHIBIT I
CITY OF ORONO
r.O. te« 6». Cryaul Bay, MiiuiMota SS323 473-
r-
fSTBUCTICTlS; riaaaa flrat raatf tba attaehaB Intotwtlon Shrat. Coiaplata Itau. .
ot Print). 1( naa4a4, attach latter or ocher Information to batter
daaerlba your repeat. Ineonplata apylleatlona will not ba aeeaptad.
1.
2.
5.
6.
7.
8.
#7 jJkT Of EXHIBITS
PROPERTY ADDRESS
Ugal daaerlytloa ahall.ba ahown on atiaehed SiAvey, Eahlblt
APPLICANT
MBiltfit AddrMB
If Applicant la not ownar. eaplaln djg
3. OWNER PtlOfl#
Htiiint AddMtt Ar^
(Monch/Yoar)Date Property Acquiredrty Ac
iiptp also own othe^adjacent parcels of land
4. AGENT
not;paiso own c
rina
^ Phone
AddTMt
NOTICES BhouM bo oont to; Applicant
PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT _ _
PRESENT USE «aaldantlal X" (Other) __
Ointr
Vacant Land Vacant Buildlng(a)
/
4i#nt
e
Dafcrlptlon
Initial Arolfeation
ouat Ineluda:
( Application For*
L Property Ounert LIf
Certlflcata of ^urv
-t ' Fee Receipt # ^
Dart Received
•p -i;..
Staff Inforiation
A ___ Plat Nap
5 Inventory
6 ___ Staff
Other Infomation
7 _ __________
8 ___ ________
9___________
lO'
I
—
r I! / i. * r
Occupied Bulfdlng(a)
* : •
L’ IV
DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ ^
_ aatabllah now Moa continue or oapond on la ting ua a _ build naw add on _ riw'fti _ rapUtt
Describe request in detail: yh'>l"S'fj/ 7'S * X 3^ '
_ ri^ 6^ l)Cu6e .o
• 3
t u
1
‘ I9T -
EXHIBIT I
I
IT OF EXHIBITS
5®lcrlptlpn
Initial Arf>lie^tlon
oust Include:
( Application Koru
L'' Property Omera Lit
i_. Certificate of 3ur\*
Fee Receipt #
* Data Received .
•r .
«,
Staff Inforaiatiow
4 ___ Plat Na^
5 Inventory
6 ___ Staff
Other Inforaatiofi
^^1 BEl_=
ij,r 0.\ .^ --------------
:tion cost $ /9 c€l:
^ oo^ ^ add on _ rfodel ^ replace
7 "oT ‘ X g«2» '
\\\'
land use PLANNlWi,
ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION
L
T -473-
• *v
ISTHUCTIOWS; PiMM flfPt rod ^ tl^o b*tt*r
(Typ. or Print). ** not b. oee.pt.d.
deocribe your re^ueat* Ineonplata appi
1 PROPERTY ADDRESS CRl^a( /> <y
^ * u^^oSpuJ. .i«u b.-.ho^ y .«.ch.d^Ov.,. txhibit i
2. APPLICANT — .f iSo-.----------- VSy-----! ^
Hollins Addrooi _Z^--------------------^
If Applicant la not oimar, anplaln- - -
^ •79<- Vc-Zy/ItilUns Addraaa _ r'm ■■ y
3. OWNER
<juwv*d*K ^ Vnar )
------ ----—— ~ I • —4. AGENT
[sT OF EXHIBITS
'*•% • • '
# D>«crtptloQ
Initial Analleatlon
auat Include:
t. Application Korn
! Property CWners Ll»
j Certificate of Sun.
u ' Fee Receipt
• Data Racalved .. ----------
By _\ I , ili—
4
^taff I^forMCiPli
A ___ Plat Map
5 Inventory
Staff Coa^enli
iji^itdar Tnfoma tion
7 ___
ttoilint Addroai
HOTICES Wiou M bo aont to:Applicant
PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT
PRESENT USE
vacant Und_ _ _ Vacant Bulldlng(a)
yC^ Ovner Agdflt
; ‘
ri i f Ur I'.'-.
Occupied BulTd'ing(a)
;;i
8.
. wn—r—
describe R«5UEST ^ HSjmTED ™™
.at.bllihne.ua. contlnu. or a.pand -latlng ua. _ build _l
“ ^ - ! '/ 9.-.' ' )C ^ dMilli
Describe request in detail:
'V'/.Vv
Lot Araa tot Vidth Hardaovar
^SYSCi9. VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED .. do th. r.,-..t.d «o.b
, JC
4K unusual PROPERTY CONDITIONS pr.v«.tl«g ««i»lU«c. .Ith lanU« a— raguU—.
10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERi^ ^ j/ . Apou
—‘*rr-7 ---77jr X 'Jm We__ia--£h^
tecrlb/^WDUE W^HIP or i^i.TicL DIFFICULTY -•trlct aoforcawnt of ton
12. Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK «. !»«««•"
L '
The APPLICANT and the PROPER^ OWER
The APrUCAMT hereby agrees to ,.reae
rc<)ulied or requeated by the ^Ing A<tolnletret , •
to pay all leea and/or unuaual anpentet
of thla application, and certlllaa that the
“upplled li true and correct to the beet of hie knowledge.
II;: ^her .:.horl.e. ree..».ble entry
::;::i:ti.tion
werl fleet Ion of this request:
/
//■ Z2-S^<^
Applicant's Signature Date
APPLICATION DEADLINE IS FIRST MONDAY OF
Owner^s Signature Date
the month before planning COMIUSS^
i -*yr£ £
dec 'I 1982
>•
Cert I riratti
for TJcrar J. ;*•
Ir. Ijnt r, 5^.0'*k ^ , 'Trurr it^^ cf n iSr?.
HVrj.ftpin ?!i: :.•>!.r ui #7;^ •
/
\
t
\
.•
\I
/
A
/
/
/
*.* 0 V*
I h ret/ n rt.ify
♦•Ms ij a v^ut^ a:.J
rorr‘3''t r€‘:;ro; ! ’f.
fit* s * u.’^t / • .V* LwUld-
srl*^*s of .‘jM.* ;«wt f ^^:riy
i^ . f cut of tnt! ? !*ly
1^0 feet nf ^/: t . , fr.r'n ‘
Tc>W2,jiittt oV •■>"Ar*4 dV. *4 ‘ Jit f I
u no t;.a t fj t '1 ^ V j ^ . tr i
Nor^,r.em Avc-:.\iO ^>!: .* L- t»ivr.
trv C!'t er I • •!
♦ ^
the Nort.hear.toriy ar J v^^t.It rly
liner of Ji ui.r wo» f«j- y l.O ft-t-t, t» e lor itlor. of all sxl:;tirr buiiJir.eS
thurfon 'tui an ini: Ifc .irc;<:e'i of a preu^^od addition
to Hr exiatini' l\*4l Jr.r. it Jo*»t r.-t o-.ir7»:rt tn shew other iTLprcveaints or
nr.crcaoK!:#T.tr ,
li'-fi Le ;i" •40*
Late :% * ^
i • • . •
•.' r< r *vir < •••
' > ;Ir r.r /I r r
.■.r : :. .*. . 'f! tr i-^.r.rS-,
dec -ibk
. «;;*v . r i*.:- ; ^ • r.» r
J r^; I^iL» , yif.i.er.f ta
i
ORONO I
±:
(■!:OMO .-10 Alio
I'n,
20611-330
!L;^j' f/* ,; 1 ^::'';
L I .ii ^i
:M
8">!5a
SS
H M
6 Tz.#
I / >
i»i
s fi
SSS&S8
o ^ c 2 VII M
5H0O M
W* f 5 ^ 01 1^Si
01 O
»
o si-o
ng5
I
o
>
o
o
M
!<'
ii§i ||s-
i*'i
i«|52«
N Ul O O »
JJSut ^I
iiSSSS^
> Q 01 -< I^;3ssa
U1 >
Oi -<
^3
•» r- ♦
ss.■w -< o m M
3*
Si;:P-^8_ -< m m
«*
»M M
IM
St:
I
s?*S as
^3 O
M
3*
S M 3 3 S
is::’?,a,,,snm
ii
^3
fi
Vi
u:m^9M
3-
C9
>
OO
M
O
sI
71
3,1
I
1
TO:Planning Conunlsslon
PROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth
DATE:December 2, 1982
SUBJECT: #720 Doug DeMallgnon, 925 Willow Drive South
Variance
Zoning District - RR-IB
Area - 2+ acres
Application - Variance -Height + setback variances required
for fence in front yard.
Pertinent Ordinances:
a) 31.433 non-encroachments
Allowed height for fence front yard
proposed height
variance
3.5*
8*
4.5* or 128%
b) 37.090 Screening Required
37.100 Type of Screening
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Application
Property Owners List
Plat Hap
Applicant's sketch
Staff sketch
Mr. DeMalignon has installed an 8* garden trellis for vine
like shrubs growing in his front yard. The trellis is located
3* off the street right of way (private road outlot - French
Lake Road). The applicant wants to erect an 8* high stockade
fence along that same line - see survey. Exhibit D. The private
road ends at a cul de sac with 4 residential lots between the
subject lot and the cul de sac. The access at the west end
near the garages will be closed off. In previous discussions
with the applicant, staff advised of the vision problems created
by 8* high solid structures for the west access. The front of the
lot is located along a curve and a hill. The east access is
located at the crest of the hill affording clear vision if
the proposed fence is not continued to the east lot line.
!
Our zoning code establishes a height standard for front yard
fences at 3.5*. The code fails to give specific guidelines
for setbacks for front yard fences that exceed the height
limitations.
1720 Doug DeMalignon - Variance
Page 2
it-
i»Mr
I
Review Sections 37.090 Screening Required and 37.100 Type
of Screening. A 15* minimum setback is required for screening
fences installed along streets. The height limitation for
such solid fences is 5* and at least 50% open. A louvered
fence is considered solid if it blocks direct vision.
There is no doubt that the applicant's nearest neighbor and
developer of the property would prefer total screening from
DeMalignon'8 "car fixing" home occupation. Our responsibility
is to assure the public's health, safety and welfare. A
screening fence 6' - 8' in height located 3' off the road
right of way can be placed along the west front side of the
property and not create hazardous conditions for users of
the road. I would suggest that if the fence is to be
continued to the east access location that the fence be located
15' off the right of way approximately 75' from that east
access point. Planning Commission may ask that staff determine
the setback line based on vision considerations.
Stockade fences can be adjusted to any desired height,
fence would afford the desired screening.
A 6
If Pl^mning Commission is to deny the application, use the
guidelines setforth in 32.340 and require the immediate removal
of the trellis.
BH
LAND USE PUNNING
ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION
EXHIBIT
CITY OF ORONO
f.O. M, Ci7tut l«T, Mnncseta SS323 473-7357
gffVCTIW! PlMM (tr«t tm4 tkm InfemtlMi IhMC. CiMptaca IcaM 1-13
(Ty^a or rrlHt). U «aa4a4, atuali lattar or othar InfenMClim to battor
AooorUa your ra^at. Iiiaoaylata ayylleatlona will not ba aeeaatoa.
V* *
< '
:1
.r
1.
2.
4.
7.
8.
PROPERTY
Ltfsl 4«Mrlrcio^«hall
APPLICANT
ADDRESS S. ^A/|;/p|.^^w •rnxt^fisibo t, s / 7,' fss
/>A "/?
tahlblt 3
n»oot V
NiilliiC Ad4r«D«leki
3f 4fytt«aat la not ownar, oxplaln
3. OWNER l">c ^' ^7<*»Ss . / 7/C rhona.
Date Property Acquired //7?o (NMCh/Yoar)
I (do) (do not) also own other adjacent parcels of land
AGENT ____________________________
Ftm________________________________________
ex'Applicant5e NOTICES SkMilA W Mat to:
t K :SENT ZONING USE DISTRICT ^
PRESENT USE toataanttal __(Othar)
Oiiacr
l IL —-------------V.■ \ i npr - I 19B2
-f.. •
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Pcacrlotion
Initial AppMcatl^^
moBt inoluda:
1
2
3
Application Fora
^ Froparep (Xmerc List
Cartlficata of Survey
raa Kacelpc «/'i/
• Data Racalvad
*r'y/l
tnl
'(♦ rf <*-•
Staff Inforaacion
4 _ flat Nap
5 Inventory
6 ___ Staff
9Hifr Inf9iytiffn
7
i
9
10
11
12
Veeent LaaA Vacant SulldlngCa)
I .M
Oteuplad lutl4lAg(a)
' ' 1 M T '
I, •DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ aatabUah MW i»a _ aoott«» or o«pa«4 ..latln. uaa _ build oaw _ add on _ r.Md.1 _ raplaa.
Describe request In detail: t. c u •j'/rVcT* S' Aw/ ^ _
le a , •
> W>
n
ji
L' i
land use planning
ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION
cm OP ORONO
l*y» Minn—Of 55323
EXHIBIT
*73-7357
(SrCo^ue. l.«i. I . 13
PROPERTY ADDRESS ^XS’S^ ^tlfoaj
_&A // ?
bhUlc 3
niima ^y~7 fj - C'ScV t/
HiUliit AMrcu
It Afflieaat U oot omimp^ mpialn
3. OWNER /?cs>^^<^s -
Nilltal AM tm*
ftlOIIN
Date Property AcquiredT /j \ /j " V ■ - - - -- - - - ' ~ OtoBth/Y««r)I (do) (do not) alao own other adjacent parcels of land
4. AGENT mm _ _ _ _ _
Fii«
LIST OF EXHIBITS
PeGcrintim^
RBMC includ«:
1 - ApplicGtlon For»
t Fropcrty (Xmeri List
^ CtrcificGtG of Survoy
I’m Receipt #/ ^/
Pete Received
Steff IftforeiagioH
8
NOTICES ikeiild W Mat Re:Applieent Oimer
r/:SENT ZONING USE DISTRICT
PRESENT USE ><aid«itui (Other)
Veeent Umd Vecent BulldingCe)
^ ------ \ I
»TT"
; \ I npn -1 Sffi
i!. VI
Mcupi«d1ulUlnt(a)
! • ' I (;r t'/
DESCRIBE ^^UEST ESTIIttTED CONSTRUCTION COST $ I,
. •■Ubtlab MW «!•• _ ««eli>u« or Mpand Mtatlnt -------------------
— •« on _ rnodol _ ropUo.
Describe request In detail: (cn'^ir^ci , ...f
v.V^c-:.S /^c>7y r/ A,
front •Ido
Lot Aree
Reer) Other
Lot Width Merdcover
he,tr
10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS »rMMtt.>s cmp U mc . with tMii« ox. rwqwtrMMe.:
~">i erd^r to ccyyipi^ Se't - njcv U
h.*uc ia desirey c>/*-»^os-/ //t, rAc cf cor eAii,^^s/u<rfv-
■f'rcfi't CfCi h.
HAMSHIP or PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY r».i.u. _________~
ly"? 't IS w/-e..so.,.^6/f ^.7- W-s//rv>.o/ C^.
12. De.crlb. EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK ^
H SH ^
>^8" «"<* <*^te this .pplleatlon.
M# fwl f?** leiuenel eepeneee incurred in reviev wther euthoriiee reeeoneble entry onto the property
aMMlL U^CM*!!!a «•«*«•• that tha tofomatlon waSba^a,.MPll.4 I. tru. a«4 -rraat to cha b... hi. hnowlad..: -"<*
C-6c)pC c^^ y
Applicant *^8 Signature
S X V V,
Date Owner's Signature Date
: I
A #
m
'^•
w
3 ;S m -om > s
V -< >>mzg
:a
? is! :o «miig
s8
VI u u VI CA 30 9 M*oM
ni
H
3
I
ao
aoo
0
1
'*4
Ir«
gi
rs»r*
oa
ftsim > »
|2|i
r- o 5 r- a
“mSS
5S5-®
•: r» 5
VI m Q o
Iss'-u
^ * n,
M
0
1
M
M
Ia
I
Ul
$
®S«
IN*r r- VI M
> ^ o w a I
o a r M
I
, t>*5^2-Or- fN»
SS*^
i is3
i;o
^ O X s
S VI X 30
P X u u
H i-« Q g
*lil
!Si r,M H
O
M
I
VI
rvrs>
oo
9!
|h(i DEC-I 1982
#720
C!i V (>r
f «
i^sa&sssaasBi
5-4
S o
a
V
IV»I
fWs
s
‘-i
nr-3
< ^
|o«i exhibit
1
\
-
^ •
; V --
. -.V., ►•'•
,.|--.^4>'
' \ V*
' y
' \ V*
*. v v^»
________;_________
A‘ ’»:;»' 1
0*t,, 0D •
(7 O Q
. ^
m ■
EXHIBIT
...... . ,.
• or »--r, I A.
- •» o ?'r.. . ' ' • >.(
■ - • V. , y‘rn: ......V.: ^
f>RoPoseD reA/cE
/A/ R^o
#7 U
4?
' r
i »' r.
i •.r i-•«
•.
* ;:
^0 * ’*
'• I«.
^ r.-. - or: I r ^ : . - * • ,
■' •••. a ,i
.i ;X>: .
I : ..■ . I 1:; fl
■‘ ’ • crl c- .* « »•
:j»vi
!>.♦ 1
c
1*
4( *Y r ■< ••
I *
Vj
•.(
L U
DEC - I 1982
u
CITY OF 0Ti0\’0
AM
# •. V
i I EXHIBIT ■__^
V 1 . I . ♦
> *
i*
-#
V-*,r
• •• «• • ’ •
v^•4 ' m 4 ^#7 iT’*>■•n.
4 . t. t M . .• -.* . . •
•i:.1 '■ Iv • .. *.: ..- ..<:^..t. ,. - ^
• • l.r: r • ./ r,i r r»
^ • J*. • • til^ 9 ^ • • . ••« .i U . •.? I
i:* p •j.-.j ir.
« 4^ 4 r •. 'i*. j -1 s r
C»c* j;.
0
1 4 •r-'
Tr* r. -r r\
^ r.. r i. rr •* •.-. :r.'■~^Tv
• »V
3
t *c\
•(
■\\i J
ii@(^n'v?rgifr:-—in.
DEC - I S82
J.
..CIIV OF Oi(!";')
iaia«—i> II
f
■■
Vi' —.
TO:Planning Commission
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth
DATE:
SUBJECT:
December 2, 1982
Formal Action on Island Ordinance - Revised Draft
Received by Planning Commission Members on
November 19, 1982
The Planning Commission is asked to ratify the poll vote taken
of Planning Commission members on Monday, November 22, 1982.
Three members contacted the City staff to approve the revised
draft of the Island Ordinance.
I have been advised that any changes to be made by the Planner
or City Attorney will not be siibstcuitive but merely rewordings
for clarification or leaal raquirements.
'} i
f
1 I
• -
' r ' >
i
>im
*r
% ■
/
!■
-• V. , '.
TO:Planning Commission 1
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth n
DATE: December 3, 1982
SUBJECT: #718 Thomas Crosby, 745 Spring Hill Road - Subdivision
f
Zoning Districts > RR-lB & LR-lA
Application - Subdivision - Metes & Bounds - To create new lot
totaling 8 acres in area
Mr. Crosby proposes a metes and bounds division of one of his
properties totaling 24.5 acres in area. The newly created lot
to the east of the existing tennis court is 8 acres in area.
Access to the lot will be via an unnauned public cartway (2 rods wide)
beginning at the intersection of Spring Hill Road and then a
private driveway starting at the Crosby property. The private
driveway easement serves the Crosby home, the caretakers house
and the Winston residence to the immediate south of Crosby's
other property.
The two properties are divided by a zoning district boundary line.
LR-lA to the west of that shared line and RR-IB to the east of
the shared line.
The parcel to the west was divided back in 1971 creating a 16
acre parcel for the Winstons and the remaining 22 acre parcel.
The file for that subdivision reviews the access issue to the
newly created lot. An access through the Crosby property at
the north was approved because of the swamp and wetlands areas
along East Long Lake Road. Crosby must provide an access
easement in favor of the newly created lot.
Septic testing will not be requieed for an 8 acre lot. There
will be a park fee of $100.00. The lot to be divided contains
the main house and caretaker's residence. The Crosby homestead
will now contain approximately 16.5 acres in area. Lakeshore
setback standards will apply for all construction and septic
system installation on the newly created lot.
A public hearing will be scheduled for January 17, 1983.
CITY OF ORONO
r^^
N0IM2BK
CITY OF ORONO
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM
#71gdate, rec 'd // ^ /.^
d /
^/3/^
APPLICANT Name • //I / /V
Mailing
Address
Telephone
7 7~
y^/- ff' , /v-
/-T7 X
PROPERTY Name
OWNERS
Telephone
Mailing
Address _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(Attach list of more than one)
PROPERTY LOCATION
Street Address
Legal Description
(PID)
EXISTING LAND USE
Number of Tax Parcels
Development Size y- c<'Acres Dry Land
Acres Wet Land
Acres Total, all parcels
Present Use (chec)c)Residential; no. of units
Other (specify)
Present Zoning Dist.
PROPOSAL _ _ lot line rearrangement only (no new building sites)
subdivision for new building sites
n\imber of building sites: - existing units
/ new units
LEw
sphone _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
«
V ^ ' -fc ^ ^ //
“phone
-M_ _ _ _
Dry Land
Wet Land
Total, all parcels
ential; no. of units
(specify) _ _ _ _ _ _
building sites)
•V %
\y i.';^'si3Uvy/R
NWI2BK
CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO
SUBDIVISIOM AFU.ICRTION FORM #718
date, rec 'd // - /J?- i
—
e rta^c'd
^/3/St
APPLICANT Name
Mailing _ .
Address ) Jjy.
Telephone
/
J -y y/ ff’ ^ y. y Ji'
PROPERTY Name
OWNERS
/ 4 t Telephone
Mailing
Address
(Attach list of more than one)
PROPERTY LOCATION
Street Address
Legal Description
(PID)
EXISTING LAND USE
Number of Tax Parcels
Development Size
Present Use (check)
Present Zoning Dist.
Acres Dry Land
Acres Wet Land
Acres Total, all parcels
Residential; no. of units
Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _
PROPOSAL lot line rearrangement only (no new building sites)
subdivision for new building sites
number of building sites:
/
proposed gross density _ _ _
minimum lot size: /’
proposed use: (check) ^
existing units
new units
total units
units per _ _ acres
square feet dry buildable land
residential
other (specify) _ _ _ _ _
MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION
(Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting)
Application cooipleted
Preliminary Plat information on
a certificate of survey
Certified Property Owner's list of
owners within 350' - from Hennepin
Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Govern
ment Center
Stamped, legal sized envelopes (PIO)
pre-addressed to each of the names on
the above list.
5. Application fee per current fee schedule:
______ sketch plan only $50.00
* 2 lot prelim, plat 150.00
3+ lot prelim, plat
(sketch plan included)
Additional Improvement
review fees per fee
schedule $
200.00
+ $10/lot
DATC
DATE
APPLICANTS SIGN.-\TURE
owner’s SIGNATURE
. 1
hi
N. U2 sm 36, T H6 «63 j '
SuSAa,
•• w* • »
0
• » - *'•
• • •• • ••
L s •• .•»• • .. • /
J .•» It •
•.M
\ <\
T^rik i -.. r.x\--^
:% ■? ■ 'V.
- Tt-^
'N
U
ff
«fr»
/
- ? ►——
1
•A
• «
'—1 f J
V < ‘ .^____.iJ^j-\r“Ir-• 7i —~-.r-.fr-.—UUI' ■•,
/ !►
v< .'mr'
k'?4L^ote£< tSA^
4 -." 1 -a i
M
♦T.
PROI»OSU> DIVISION RLAT f0»: Thomas Crosb*. Sf
OEscRipnoN Of (Asimv parcii :
ThM PMI4 Cw»rnfl»nl Ui 1, Stctiwi Twnshlp 1H Rangt n wMch Hn fuNrhr ol ttw lollwtng OncrlMl Hn»: Comiwpclng M th# looffwtit cprnar * Cowfnmtnt U( I Iwnc» on an a»u ’ofd
hfarinq Souttt Pdaprat* M lainutas 51 iatomlj East alenp ttia south llna ol saW Gontrnnant lot 1. a atsimcR ol 715.P laat to tha actual point al baoinnino ol tha lino to ta dascriOM: thanca itorth ? da-
graas 5?minutos B mlnutos East, adistoKa af 45A62laat; thanca ttoath lOdagraas 07 "linutas 30 saiondstutto tha shora ol Indian] Laka and thara tarminating. (Araa is 8.4 7 acrasi
DESCRIPflON or WESTERLY PARCEL:
All ol Coaofnmant tat I. Saction 31 T«anshlp 1IR Ranqa 73 aica^ that part *hk,h lias aastarip al tha IoiMpi dOKrtPid llna: Commancif^ at tha soulfmast cornar « said Coaar nnant Lot I thanca on an
•ssunid bMTin) Stuth 19 M mfnulH 51 Mconds thf south Hnt cl sold GMrnntnt ^ Oiislincc of fl5.44 foot li tho octuot point of booinning of thf lino to 6f deurttjfd thoncf
North 2 day rtas 57 minutos 33 soconds East • distanca 454.47 laat thanca North U daqraas 07 rninutos A' pcands East to tha shora al Lydiard Laka and thara tarminating.
All ol tha Northeast Quartor a l tha Nart hmost Quartor al Sk U oii 34 Taonship 114 Ranga 73 aacapi that parlfiich lias loutharty al tha loliamin, oaKriaad lina: Baginmng at a point m ina *a$t hna ol
said Narthwast Quartor ol ^ ***i UnMit Quo^r distant 754. M laat south al fta northMit cornar al said Nai toast (Sartor ol tha Nortlmast Quartor: thanca on a Paaring ol LasL a distanca al Ptt 71 Ital!
thanca South 70 dagraas 41 lalinjlas M sacondi Cost ta tha oast lino to said Narthwast (kiortor to tha Nar pm t Quartor and thara tarminating. for purposas to this dtscriplion tha south lina to said
Narthwast Quartor to tha ttortiawst Quoitor Is assumad to Otar South P dagraas 14 minutos 51 saconds Eosl
Oatoml ”wth^dp*i*l^ "" "f *»«* suprrtsion and Pal 1 aoi a duly *** drod Und Suryayar undar tha laws to Pa Stato to Mlnnasato.
uryayars
t'.'J
#718
SCAif r.m‘