HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-19-1982 Planning Packet‘■l-.W
'V'V•a*'",'
■/
t ■
i'.
r
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:30 PM
MONDAY, JULY 19, 1982 1
Council Representative - William B. Van Nest, Mayor
Call to Order
1. Call to order/roll
Public Hearing
2. 7:30 PM #685 Charles Krogness, 185 Brown Road South
Preliminary Subdivision
3. 7:45 PM #692 Douglas Aabel, 1580 Long Lake Boulevard
Preliminary Subdivision
Action
4. #585 «
Schlee Builders, Inc., 3660 Shoreline Drive
Review of Revised Approved Preliminary Plans
5. #603 William Wear/Rlchard Raiche, 2910 Watertoim Road
Final Subdivision - Resolution
6. #657 Michael Pluhis/William Memik, 2710 Walters Port Lane
Final Subdivision - Resolution \
7. #694 Thomas Serenpa, 1670 Shadywood Road
Variance
8. #695 Guenther Roth, 1428 Baldur Park Road
Variance "i
Work Session
9. #693 Theron Hineline, 1565 Orono Oaks Drive
Conditional Use Permit
10. #696 Hildur Hollander, 250 Hollander Road
SubdiviSion
Infonaation I tons
11. Planning Commission to select Planning Commission Representative
to attend July 26, 1982, Council meeting.
Approval of Minutes
12. Approval of the Planning Coimnlssion minutes of June 21, 1982.
i
. t
i
$
VILLM5E OF OEONO
VUilMi f
^ r
rnmk
r ■
■*c ^ .
. V %
■: wv ,
C
TO:
FROM:
Planning Commission
Jeanne A. Mabusth
i,./
■il
■*s-# ‘ ■ ■'“
I
DATE:
SUBJECT:
July 14, 1982
#685 Charles V. Krogness, 185 South Brown Road -
Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing 7:30 PM
Zoning pistrict - RR-IB
Planning Commission Action - Recommendation of Preliminary Approval
At our %A>rk session meeting staff advised the applicant of the
possible need to realign the newly created lot line and the possible
need to require a shared access for both lots at Brown Road.
In regard to the location of the existing septic system on
Lot 2, staff met with the septic engineer for applicant in
order to determine the exact location of the septic system
in relation to the lot line. It was found to be right on
the lot line and not 10 feet into Lot 1. The lot line has
been slightly altered to allow for a minimum setback of 10*
for existing drainfleld. The lot line change had little
effect on the proposed house location.
I regret I do not have the County's written response concerning
access to the pl^t but they have assured me that there will
be no problem in creating a new curb cut within the 40' wide
access corridor of Lot 1. In fact, their recommendation will
ask for the removal of certain plantings along the roadway
that will make both accesses far safer for future owners and
the general public that use Brown Road.
Staff has no other concerns relating to the Krogness plat
and suggests the following approving motion:
To recommend preliminary plat approval of the 2 lot plat of
Charles Krogness finding that the proposed subdivision meets
all septic standards setforth in the Orono On-Site Septic
Code and the standards of the RR-IB zoning district and that
each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its
use as a single family residence wlthoub the need of any
setback variances, such approval is subject to the following
conditions:
1 -Wetlands to be described on the plat as drainage easements
and dedicated to the public - a conservation and flowage
easement shall be required over, under and across the
wetlands.
2 -Proposed house and all accessory structures on Lot 1 must
meet all setback standards of the RR-IB zoning district.
3 -Future Owner of Lot 1 must obtain an access permit from
County Highway Department prior to construction.
4 - Park ration fee of $100. 00 for newlv rreated lot.
j
1.
IV-..
* . . li
% U
r“
/♦ ■
/.»
/
i . r
>C,> -
HENNEPIN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
320 Washington Av. South
Hopkins. Minnesota 55343
* ^
.A j
• *. *•.
:
"1
935*3381
July 13. 1982
Ns. Jeanne Nabusth
Zoning Administrator
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay* Minnesota 55323
M/\ I «iQio ii '
Dear Ms. Mabusth:
RE Proposed Plat - "Charles V. Krogness”
CSAH 146 NW Quadrant Luce Line Trail Corridor
Section 3* Township 117* Range 23
Hennepin County Plat No. 1031
Review and Recommendations
Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review
of proposed plats abutting County roads. He reviewed the above plat and found
It acceptable with consideration of these conditions:
■For future Improvements to CSAH 146 the developer should dedicate an additional
7 feet of right of way making the right of way 40 feet from the center of CSAH 146.
•Although the access spacing Is very close Hennepin County will allow a direct
access from Lot 1 to CSAH 146. With the steep back slope, grading must be done
and all overhanging branches trlmned to keep sight distance open.
•Any new access to a county road requires an approved Hennepin County entrance
pemlt before beginning any construction. See our Traffic Division for entrance
penalt forms.
•All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility
permit prior to beginning construction. This Includes, but Is not limited to,
drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. See our
Maintenance Division for utility permit forms.
•The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County
right of wqy.
Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt.
Sincerely,
James N. Wold, P.E.
Chief, Planning and Programming
JMW/LDW:p1
HENNEPIN COUNTY
on equal oppothxVIy crnplover
4
'5
^
I -H« 11
t iBtfi
-\a'
HC 1233 PKOPgRTY OWNERS LIST ^/?O/!/0
DEPT OF PROPERTY TAXATI
A-A09 OOVCRNMCNT CCNTCR
MINNCAPOLISb MN SS4S7
UtT Size
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RePRCSCRTfO OR THIS
“««r. ,« Vo/rtr—w..
ARO SCLICr.
HERRCRIR CO. OEPT.
DATE
FEE Olf^TNER
TAX PAYER/
MAILING ADDRESS
PROPERTY ADDRESS
■■■■n----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rlA
/t/r) n
JUfejf'foceftssoc.-.M.&£tSf- ^
fip et»t 9^0/ - Mij
£j- £> Uftn/^
1/an^’<: ST/f/scA/
' 1/ !\/£S s__
j,
ft f\ /( _^v ___________
Me ili/!il <T- eSee>^ flfoT~ /1-S^//ia/P£>■^J- -r
If:/) a Xaa^setl caa-CM!.
/n^'D S-k)/:/lef £nfL
l^ t( «/ *f -
/.o^f? s.p/^/iev
S/9/M.
SA/ng
---------------------LPAf^P SML
£BAfX £.
SXCk/Af/PD i&T/yxZ/ga^^ a/n^
JA.
IL
S/f/ȣ
!M<■ UlCil ST- /Seh^fifp'r l)SS!/i»/££>
-Si
r7^n sjtfy D'nufefe-i^sixA //OT /^S^/ £//££>
_______L
if
IQ_
13
t3t/Tsc.£xcwiJjei> ^ffA/*
/' I ( fi f(
((
i3i<'SD.e/foM/ £D /£
sAm
Lf)yo S t£iL-_P‘' “ “ " ~ ('T' f &//££)
^ wr a^s/ &fi/££).u
j,j//aM ct¥/iei''S££lD/ ftt\/££)
A /f? fhJD£/^£Of/ Sfl/t>£.
f^nn/rPPi'</? /PAfi!l/f£H/ Cf^
o7
notrss/&»I£0
i,ifet?n P/e/rauK>4mF£
Ions cm^^i
if. SuMT^f^T’
<ifime
.mm VV/a^
,,, MAH I9I9K------
__lAmEciiim
PXaPXftrt'
"~ir^W±1
7 m
TO:Planning Commission
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth
DATE:
SUBJECT:
July 13, 1982
#692 Douglas G. Aabel, 1580 Long Lake Blvd
Metes 6 Bounds - Lot Line Rearrangement
- Subdivision
I •
Public Hearing - 7:45 PM
Planning commission Action - Recommendation of Preliminary Approval
List of Exhibits
Property Ovmers List
Planning Commission minutes (6-21-82)
Metes & Bounds survey
Drawing of metes and bounds
description to be required for
subdivision
Exhibit E - Septic Memo
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
a formal plat for this lot line rearrangement based on tne t^iowing
findings: (let me know if I’ve forgotten any noted at our last
meeting)
1 -The proposed subdivision will secure the existing front yard
of Lot 11 for septic upgrading and the newly acquired area for
offstreet parking.
2 -The proposed subdivision will permit the upgrading of the
existing structure on Lot 11 and permit o%mer occupied
residency as opposed to the rental user.
3 -There is nothing in the code that defines a simple legal
description and the need for platting if that description
is more than a single sentence. The triangular parcel
could not be described in a more simple description.
4 -The subdivision application will be withdrawn if the expenses
of a platting are incured.
5 -The existing structure could be expanded (upward) without
the neet of variance review - both Orono Code and State
Building Code contain no condition that would require
by bhG Cifcy if Gn expansion exceeds 50% of the
assessed market value of a structure. The subdivision
is the only vehicle available to the City that will allow
controls over future expansion of marginal property.
3
#682 Doug Aabel
Page 2
Subdivision
■i i
t
t •
staff has no other comment concerning the subdivision except to
inform you that since our last meeting Aabel had septic testing
done in the front yard confirming an area of approximately 640 sf
of drainfield. The two bedroom house given percolation results
would require 600 sf but remember there is no room for an alternate
site if this one fails. Applicant should be placed on notice
that all future expansion must be limited to non bedroom and
required non bathroom additions.
I have redone a survey submitted by Coffin for this review that
reflects a true metes 6 bounds subdiv:.sion (Exhibit D). In
reality, we are creating 4 parcels. If we alter the descriptions
of Lots 11 & 12 by creating two smaller parcels than we also create
legal descriptions for the renuiiniAg larger parcels. The plat
would have merely rearranged Lots 11 ( 12 by the realigned shared
lot line (Exhibit D line E>P).
.1
Staff Recommendation
. >To approve the metes and bounds division of Douglas Aabel for
a lot line rearrangement based on findings cited above and subject
to the following conditions:
1 - Ovmer of homestead lot. Parcel A, must combine said lot
with Parcel C.
2 - Owner of homestead lot. Parcel B, must combine said lot
with Parcel D.
■isf/A r
3 - All future expansion of combined Parcels B 6 D must be
limited to non bedroom and non bathroom expansion.
•1'
/». ■ - >
I
2^
■
DC 1233 PWOPEWTY OWMgRS LIST
OEPT OF PROPCRTY TAXATION
A-609 OOVEANMCNT CCNTCA
MINNEAPOLIS MN 89407
LIST SIS
I CIRTIPY THAT THE FACTS RCPSESCNTCO ON THIS
CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE
SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS
OATS ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY
FINANCE DIVISION, TO THE REST OF MY RNOWLEOCE
AND SELIEF.
NENNEPIN CC. DIPT. OF PROPERTY TAX4TMII
_______________ PATM BY
FEE OWNER TAX PAYER/
MAILING ADDRESS
I
JJ.// __________/y
^/uae^
Z&-//?-23
^ S^A/a fuif
^'7,A
jT'7iz£Afj9iA/
Bjy/t£^<L£dIL
VA y.ft90/.
p
3^/ <9^ ^£9^
Ase,
ZZ
vl/
\/7^- /av/f
3^-11^-23
L^lp ^'j 3P£cA/Ia»:£ ______^
7-7-//^-Z3
i3r. S3 j 9^/7
a/ 7) rA^je^Ad/
L(7jr^ W/i)nA9:9 fiyS/L^. GKnf/&
\/Li<f - & •If'tfA
7
JIM I 0 ISS!
SAjne-
a •Y .
EXHIIiiT
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 21, 1982 Page 11
Mr. and Mrs. Doug Aabel were present.
Kelley questioned the neighbors fence on Mr. Aabel*s
property? Do we usually require subdivision because
of the encroachment of a neighbor's fence?
Aabel noted that the neighbor put the fence up and that
the driveway is on his neighbor's property so they are
going to swap.
Planning Commission cave the applicant a sense of
approval for the metes and bounds description.
Opheim felt that the metes and bounds description
wds sinpld enough* He felt thet Mr* Coffin is e
competent surveyor and that this legal description
is as simple as humanly possible for a triangular
piece of property.
Rovegno stated that it is unreasonable for staff to ask
for exceptions to the subdivision when the code does
not define simple legal descriptions.
Kelley asked why the applicant couldn't just tear down
the fence and move the driveway.
Aabel stated that the drainfield is inadequate and ho
wants to upgrade the drainfield. He noted that perc
tests are being done right now.
Mabusth added the additional parking area will secure the
front yard for upgrading septic systemw
Planning Commission found no further problems and scheduled
a public hearing for July 19, 1982.
Planning Conmlssion elected Charles Kelley to attend the
July 12, 1982, Council meeting.
Povegno wanted to note for the record that his neighbor
was red tagged by the Building Official and that the
neighbor stated that he was very pleased in wWch the
way the Building Official handled the whole situation.
Goetten moved to approve the Planning Coomiission minutes
of May 17, 1982, as is.
Hammerel seconded. Vote: Ayes (7), Mays (0).
The Planning Commission adjourned at 10:30 PM.
i/TOUGLAS AABEL
1580 Long Lake Blue
Subdivision
1692
representative to
ATTEND COUNCIL MTG.
COMPLIMENT PROM
MEMBER TO CITY
OFFICIAL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
ADJOURNMENT
10:30 PM
in V. t ’.
EXHIBIT
ir-.U n:' v
..nu ly, .^T., - :t* i--'-*
::. Cn ^ ty, : ;: .’t-.
T ;.cr«Ly certify V-«.t ‘.hi? it- i» ‘ri-.-- Mi-
r<::Tece!'.t ; *'c;. i ;;urve% o:' y • nt- :. *’f
Vi' »5 «or.,- w I'' t» 1" **l\ i
rl. r. •*. •y.i:'.!r, bv'I-i:,.- ft •: -'yli ' !r.,-
r iT'-’t' •.■■-; V .'i'•'<.•■»HV t,'.'.*: ••.or.. It JOvfi ".ot .•ur'ini t.
*'• ('.. ol;. .•' 5: •H'f'v •-j r.t. ,t r.cTC-f;. . lit: » :‘.*i
« nrc-i^rCvi vtivi :ir< uTO
li' '.i1 >'t i ..
I" - jb
Date : 6-:--i.'2
0 : Irrr. rr.Mr<ier
j..-.ti Jurvcvcr -u;.:
_^ri( J-* V I 1; r.ctc'tu
rroiXi pc: d'^srrintions:
«/ liOt i. •-xco'it t:-it v»rt i'.-'ttJ- rly cl
t.'.vi foils lire: Tf r -n*'! .- . t';.! .'.rv.t -
Hvift ror.v.T EiiJ lot; t*. r,r ’crt: 'iLcr, «•;• -l-ifii llr.“
cf S’-iic lot i .liatn.'f'i'' 7","' f«'.t *.;. til. fCT.'. :-f i *yir.-
nlr, -'f tv? ilr.-' t-ilny v-r>-_r! ;i-..i; t - i . -il. Ij;, 1.:1 t
'r.i.' to tlv-- .loutb'r... i.l;.>i ^’f :-I. lot, -nv t
-llovlri-
-> ‘S lire ;.rc i t.r ’ crt' ,'."l ’/’.et.: i--• : '. ■ •r*'ir.j .t
iir. o;
< t-.?1ry v-e*_r! il .ii;1 : '■ J
,outb'r..i al.'.c '’f : -1 lo
jOt 11 iyir*t V.1'
,rc J t.r ’ crt' ,'."l i
.y <•; of j Ic ir : *f
r • lu J.V.t .. .'1 1 ; C*. :*»:
* r • ^r
•.joir.t -if : Oiiinninc cf t >,• Hr. io: t. .•?.< .-•
ccflaetlnr rif,ht :« cl. vtix.c... o! l> t* •if.co
cl. flert'r. ' U-*. t tc t-;3 It-rt’.er.: -in- c: . i: iol,
1* : t.'.virc cr:..ln(«
oil in’nlivio'r Duno noitiiior.''.
Ty jTt 11 £-:ce t t'.t 'orf vut*-;;. I. ;;., V..- t : .f t.
^ c-.-c'-fibia lir.ii ..r.c; ita IcrUorly -ixt r: irr.: t ri .-.j ot
•
— •4 ♦ .
' * ••Lt: vir
I-#,'r..! ri hX,♦..* i Cu
: t.9 tr.» k.,, t i-i
lir
o: I •'/t;
W‘i‘
Lv;-.- 'j tii-t-.r.r- -'.•• 7:*.; tr. » oolr.‘ to, inri'-. ' V lir. b:ii
dc::rrRoj; tbr.t-. 'jeflfi'-tii., rlfht •• oirtM.'*'- o: I'.'b'
t} I ori loft 13” to the V.ortr.ivly lln- 'f r. l ; . .1. ; f. t-irc
endln,:; i.H.t t!..--t tx.; t cf jnt .1' .y:.'. .7v.;tV-rl^ tf ft - fr.lLt'vlr.,-.•.•cf'r:? •.. ; >;•■•
n.'.r.cir.f at thi ..out ?ot t 'i;r.0M' .o*' r. iiJ lot; thtjr.re rert.h *i«cr;, the i. : t L.::‘ .'-t
ti distanre of V-.. ''c ‘ t' • ?io 'oir* 'f ••; ir.."lr... of tr.-i lir.' toln. . er-'r’s t' orf ;
flectin,' loft tr the Soato rly l!r.o cf cold lot, <i.-. tbiro • r dir, ,
all Ir. 'hIVoo': U:,’ 1»-n.iiir.'n".
Z**j ff (rr.co, r.r' KcU-. *
I' .-‘r______________________
uleiv
L.—tsaeBsmsaaaa
EXHICIT
Cortii'lfata c; ;varv<*y
I'nr 3:u^Us L. AjL>9i
of Jit ll, 4*lb«o'- Vt.v: .»ci.!i*.ion
iior.r.'inlr. Coi nt^ , .Vinr..;. olsi
JunoBS
CITY OF ORONO
I hi rtfby LI:jU t:;ij is u
tr.i- iri j..Vitinr.
c:‘ a of
•iol i* '
tion’*, .i w I : * •<.»(•« lioii oi* al^
b*.iL-lr. 'A.id i?i
ini* f fi.' **•- jrl7»‘Wi\ t. eric* .
It ' .. .; : .— • r* Vj ebo*#.
► r iTw iC;.-
L.
f:
L
ELaiaii^
EXHiuif
TO;
PROM:
DATE;
SUBJECT:
JoAnno A* Zonin9 Adnlni strsfcor
Michael P. Gaffron, Septic Syeten Inspector
July 9, 1982
#692 Doug Aabel* 1580 Old Long Lake Blvd - Subdivision
evaluation for this lot indicating
the^D^LSS*??-of drainfield can be installed. With
below the pipe, this is equivalent to 900-1000 square feet of standard drainfield. Se
of*dSin?if?H*^«^* would require 190 square feetS ufr “!•tome proposed expanded
8ite'on**tho lot^ not an alternative drainfield
Xrec^nd approval of the variance with stipulation that
. I
\ir^
Nr
y '
» V . i.
< V
• f «
I
V*
'BT ' . r-r-
,
T
TO:Planning Commission
■I
FROM;Jeanne A. Mabusth
DATE:July 15, 1982
SUBJECT: #585 Schlee Builders, 3660 Shoreline Drive - Preliminary
Subdivision
Application - Review revised preliminary plans, approved by
Council July 13, 1982
Planning Commission Action - Action on revised preliminary plan
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Original plat approved July 13, 1981
Feasibility Study - Resolution
Park Commission Minutes. - May 4, 1982
Revised Preliminary Pl.:ins
At their meeting of July 12, 1982, Council requested that Planning
Commission review major revisions to original preliminary plan
for application #585, Navarro plat.
Council conceptually approved the general layout of the 12 twin
homes, the density ratio and the road designation. It was made
clear to the applicant at the time of the formal withdrawl of
application #671 that in light of the traffic concerns raised
during that review; the plat road could no longer access onto
Shoreline. Access for 24 unit PRD is limited to Blaine aligning
with Livingston to the east. The plat road (East-West section)
will be an extension of Livingston with platted access to west
for future development of western properties.
The lots appear to all have a minimum of 50' frontage along the
public street except for Lots on cul de sac. Lots 8 and 9 are
allowed access only via the plat road - no direct access onto
Shoreline. Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10 are all over a % acre and could
conceivably be combined| given LR-lC-1 special density credit
with another lot or lots to create additional units. Remember
the 24 units are approved on basis of total 9.26 acres. Planning
Commission should address this issue.
The proposed density ratio for the LR-lC-1 zoning district is
well within the required limits.
allowed - 3 units per acre
proposed - 2.6 units per acre
The hardcover also appears well within the maximum allowed 35%
500' - 1000' from lakeshore as follows:
allowed - 141,187 sf or 35%
proposed - 65,972 sf or 16%
■ w
ti
« «
f!
ti
tbUb Schiee Builders
^Page 2
*Subdivision
The retention pond is no longer designated on this property.
Developer has made arrangement with property owner to west to
direct drainage via a drainageway (drainage easement) to wetlands
on Tonka properties. The drainage easement is designated
between lot lines of 10 & 11 for a total of 20*. The Engineer
has not addressed this new improvement. The City must receive
written confirmation of this arrangement. What physical changes
need be made in Wetlands on Tonka properties to retain additional
drainage from Theater property.
A feasibility study was formally requested by Council on June 28,
1982, to determine costs and formulas for accessing these costs
for off site sewer improvements, sewer and water laterals for
T'lat and improvement of Blaine and possible need to improve
i.'.r.ersection at Blaine and Livingston. Please note all Improvement
of dlaine Avenue will involve only western side of existing road
ar>.v4 not the east side.
The Engineer has been asked to address the pros and cons of the
offset of plat road at intersection of Blaine in relation to
Livingston. Planning Commission may wish to comment.
The Park Commission has been asked to review the proposed park
site. I have enclosed the minutes of their previous review
meeting concerning the tot lot.
In review your motion should cover the following points:
1
2
3
Density Ratio > 2.6 units per acre
Proposed Hardcover - 65,972 sf or 16%
Change in access to plat
a) offset issue
I
need for traffic flow study in Navarre Heights
area to alleviate burden of 24 new residential
units and associated traffic increase
c)
d)
e)
basic lot configuration and general layout
no direct access onto Shoreline for Lots 8 &
future subdivisions of Lots 7, 8, 9 6 10
will not be permitted as areas were used in
density credit for applicati'tn #585
drainage to west
1) written confirmation from property o%mer
2) adequate width of drainage easement
3) need for physical changes in wetlands on
western property based on increa sed drainage
from plat
g)
h)
i)
comments on proposed park site
direction to Covincil on question of offsite costs
response to specific comments made by neighbors
in attendance at meeting of July 19, 1982.
E X i *
J
w
I CITY
I 4 OF
■ ORONO
City of OR.QNO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.RESOLUTION ORDERING PR^PAflATION OP A
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR CERTAIN
DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is considering a subdivision
development proposal by Schlee Builders, Inc. for the following
described property:
PID No's 17-117-23 34 0009 & 0010; and
WHEREAS, for purposes of accomodating said development and
for purposes of protecting the general public health, safety and
welfare, the City Council is considering necessary improvements to the
municipal sewer system and to the municipal streets and roads in the
area of said development.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Orono that the City Engineer be instructed to study and report to
the Council with all convenient speed, advising the Council in a
preliminary way as to the feasibility, estimated cost, and recommended
formulas for assessing s^d.d costs to benefitted properties, for the
following described Improvements:
1) Sewer Trunk installation between Crystal Place, Togo
Road, and additional connecting segments as may be
necessary.
2) Sewer Laterals within the proposed development.
I , •
3) Water Main Laterals within the proposed development
Street, curb and gutter Improvements within the
proposed development; on Blaine Avenue abutting
this development; on Blaine Avenue from Livingston
to Shoreline Drive; and any alterations to Shoreline
Drive as may be required by Hennepin DOT to accommodate
the above street improvements.
day of
A^pted by the City Council of the City of Orono this
-___, 1982.
1 Nest, Mayor' I
ATTEST:
Alberta M. Strom, City Clerk
\
\
I iii^-1
■F-
CITY OF ORONO
PARK COMMISSION MINUTES EXHIBIT c.
The regular meeting of the Orono Park Conunission was held on May 4, 19(12.
The following members were present: Kelly,
Sweatt, Tomlinson and Stinson.
ATTENDANCE
The minutes of the meeting of April 6 were
read and approved.
MINUTES APPROVED
A newly organised junior baseball league would
like to use the new field at Bederwood Park.
They have requested an outfield fence and benches
on two sides. It will be home field for two
leagues. The estimated cost of the fence and
benches will be approximately $1,000. Council
is being approached to ascertain funding.
JUNIOR BASEBALL LEAGUE
BEDERWOOD PARK
At the last meeting of the Park Commission
it was decided to release information on
Orono Parks. It will be available at the
Orono town offices.
ORONO PARKS
The City staff and Planning Commission would
like the Orono Park Commission to give them
an indication of the sixe of the Tot-Lot in»oment. RAA P&fk'TdnniBBlonlicTaU lK
SCHLEE DEVELOPMENT
the I Development,
eis it cannot A
7
:ate sixe but can offer
some guidelines, naxMly that it is essential
to have the lot not less than 7500sf and
conveniently located to all house lots. The
equipment, provided by the developer, shall
include but not be limited to a swing set,
climber with sand box and a slide. The lot
should be seeded or sodded. The above criteria
are recommended to the City staff 4 Planning
Commission. _.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 P.M.ADJOURNMENT
Respectfully submitted,
Virginia E. Swsatt
Park Commission Secretary
■i-*A
x:H
|Wf
¥
\II • liiMiiwtX
i "f ' >
■
.•ir
I
f
i.-f-
1!0:
FROMt
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Jeanne A. Mabusth
July 14, 1982
4 •G i
#603 William Wear/Richard Raiche, 2910 Watertown Road
Final Subdivision
Planning Commission Action -to reaffirm previous recommendation
for final plat approval recommended
by the Planning Commission at their
June, 1981, meeting.
As Mr. Wear's attorney's letter states, the original applicant
has sustained financial difficulties over the past year
requiring him to step dovm as the principal applicant. Raiche
has a lifted interest in the property at present. B4r. Wear
asks as executor of his mother's estate that he continue with
the application and asks the Planning Commission to recommend
final plat approval. The plat received preliminary approval
from Council on May 27, 1981, and although staff usually sets
a deadline of a year for final plat approval this requirement
is not based on ordinance standards. Coxuicil has complete
disgression in these matters so Planning Commission may
consider Mr. Wear's request.
Wear has completed all conditions setforth at preliminary
approval time except for the completion of a subdivider's
agreement and posting of a letter of credit with the City.
The plat cannot be filed until the City is in receipt of these
two items.
Staff would recommend final approval of the Rolling Meadows
plat subject to the findings and conditions setforth in the
enclosed resolution.
A
<3^
(
t.v ^
y
1
i'
iLi
caity of ORONO
CITY
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.______________m Wo A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OP
ROLLING MEADOWS
WHEREAS, The City of Orono is a municipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted
subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development
of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Cotmcil has considered the application for
a subdivision plat by William Wear and Richard Raiche, the subdividers, and;
WHEREAS, the subdivision has been approved as meeting all
septic standards and the standards of the RR-IB Zoning district finding
that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use
as a single family residence to be located without the need of any
setback variances; and
WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of
the platting regulations of the City, including:
1.
2.
f
Dedication on the plat of drainage and utilities easements. I
Creation of a new private road shown on the plat as
Outlot A.
3.Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the
Subdivider has dedicated to the City a Road and Utilities
Easement granting to the City permanent access,
improvement and utility easement over said Outlet; the
Subdivider has created non-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage
and utility easements over said Outlot in favor
of all abutting and/or benefiting lots including a declaration
of certain maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting
and/or benefiting lot otmers covenants and agrees to permanently
maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private road. .
4.Execution of a Subdivider's Agreement providing for
installation of certain improvements as a condition
of subdivision approval.
5.Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount
of $600.00.
6. Payment to the City for legal review and filing fees
in the amount of $75.00.
Page 1 of 2
f
L
■V
r
•ic.*-
r V
I CITY
I■ ORONO
City of ORQNO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Rolling^adws, Henn p
County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions:
1.
2.
Access to all newly created lots will
be via the plat road. There shall be no
(jirect access for I,ot 1 onto Watertown Road
The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City
of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder s
Office on or before _ _ _ _«—rrfwith a certified original copy o£ tHis Resolution
and executed copies of the documents noted above.
1
Adopted by the Orono City Council this
. 1982.
day of
ATTEST:
William B. Van Nest, Mayor
rr
Alberta M. Strom, City Clerk
Vi
'
Page 2 of 2
i.. !
•..I
4>.
■m
ARLO H. VANDE VEGTE, R A
ATTOHNIY AMO C0UM««.0« AT LAW
1 a.479-a 11 •
'
1S80 W. WArXATA ®0ULfVA80
^.O. MX S8
I^OM LAXt. KniiHXMTA •»•••
June 15, 1982
City of Orono Zoning Administration
Crystal Bay, HN 55323
JUM 16BE
PITY OF ORONO
Attention: Jean
RE: Lot 7, Auditor's Subdivision No. 230
Dear Jean:
from Richard Ralche Realty, Inc. wie xo ■ q„
Sh.iWhi ?rt.wrth”.*w..r 5.
____ M9a^4niiAH in thft naiM of tho Estdto. Hr* w
Setalf orthe Esta^ of Ruth F. Wear jje KTs ?n
process be continued In the "}« jf the Esu present platting,
writing to cooperate ^j/5? ®®ff’5h1ch to complete the platting
Thus, we request an 2v?Ul^rS Scessary oITthe site In order
*th2 C?t5?rw~«l" » kn« if there .re .ny ,ue,t1o«.
Very truly yours,
Arf^ll. Vande Vegte V
AW/jlh
I
■-V ■■ ^
0 U & “
OW OK ORONO
ROLLING MEADOWS
’. v;^ ‘tT
V--SCALE i. ner
f:;» ?
.V
■i-T- . -r'V
■• >• -‘vJ
u
GORDON R. COTFIN CO. INC.
• tA^O ^UAVCWS
LCVC ;.An€ , m^fclCSeTA
^ j‘> •»» •*# «
♦ ■ w /» •••• •• ••• **
•♦• • •«••_________».»•/* •
%..v ' I • • ^* •
•• •
•A
. Cl«»t» IWI oc^vVt.t
NAa.NOf $*•?*% A*€ ASt-JUCO
V*
C! ; V C‘- C -iiiiJ
-
;* -
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning ConmisaLon
Jeanne A. Mabusth
July K, 1982
" 0.1^ ONO
if
#657 Michael Pluhm/Hilliam Mernik# 2710 Walters Port &
2715 Kelly Avenue - Final Subdivision
Planning Commission Action - Recommendation for final plat
approval.
The subdividers have completed all conditions setforth at
preliminary approval. Staff recommends final plat approval
subject to the findings and conditions setforth in the
enclosed staff resolution.
fete
♦
, ♦rift
) iJ r>-
■ t •'WHft *‘•j
I • ■ -.n-* 'Ji:
.VJ d
‘» /
-A ■
f. :
• ‘1 • A ‘
aj: ' li;,
?el^ .<‘r! thel'isr.o.
•> J f»4i jr ;•»
County,
isbi "
' the- ‘ ;• .. j '»f
'J.M if: M.» r//.
■•f ♦-
/, ,4^ ;:o or'
‘iTi : .:ri
I
."k ifl'vj 1 * fv>e •. t..
f':>r r
f
s « V!
. >»
Vi. ‘ ir. r
^ -; . • ■'* ' V ior
^ ^ ; V. ■{ ,'
> - ' -r i IV
vcf»n^
jr ' ■'fi& J ,
l:'ir
I* ' gr '
• j
I
t ■
! ;
-"■'Vi.
I CITY j
I oflON<^
City of OROINO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. _ __ _ _ _
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF
CARMAN BAY HEIGHTS
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Crono has adopted
subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development
of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for
a subdivision plat by Michael G. Pluhm and William Z. Mernik, the
subdividers; and
WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements'of
the platting regulations oi the City, including:
1) Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements.
2) Dedication on the plat of utility easements for Municipal
sewer and water lines that interest the subject property.
3) Dedication to the City of a drainage easement providing
for limitations on the use of wetlands and/or drainageways
described therein and shown on the plat as "drainage
easements".
4) The execution of an open space easement limiting the total
square footage of hardcover for Lot 1, Carman Bay Heights,
to 33,000 square feet, such hardcover shall conform to
all applicable ordinances of the City of Orono.
5) Payment to the City of $75.00 for legal fees for reviewing
and recording the final subdivision and all documents
related thereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby approves the plat of CARMAN BAY HEIGHTS, Hennepin
County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions:
New driveway connection for Lot 1, Carman Bay Heights
at Kelly Avenue to be completed and existing connection
at Walters Port Lane removed, not later than January 1,
1984. Upon cosq>letion of new driveway connection Lot I's
address shall be changed from Walters Port Lane to Kelly
Avenue with adequate identification provided at Kelly Avenue
for both residences on Lots 1 and 2. Existing driveway
"ramp" and connection to Walters Port Lane to be removed,
regraded and landscaped within 30 days after completion
of new driveway connection.
f
City of ORQNO
CITY
OF
ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2) Owner of Lot 1 shall provide private easements for driveway,
utilities, ingress and egress over Lot 1 in favor of
Lot 2.
The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono
with Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before
January 26, 1983, together with a certified original
copy of this Resolution and executed copies of the
documents noted above.
The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the
plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event,
it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono
for subdivision review.
Dates this 26th day of July , 1982.
\ V'.William B. Van Nest, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alberta M. Strom, City Clerk
vrv<
' 1 V "’* ■
• A *
^ .. - - •• ‘
* ^ " V i o < A
■V
Page 2 of 2
;
mm
-i
- ■ ?
•V
TO:Planning Commission
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth
DATE:July 14, 1982
SUBJECT: #694 Thomas R. Sarenpa, 1670 Shadywood Road
Variance
Zoning District - LR-IC
Area of Lot - 14,625 sf
Application - request to expand on non conforming accessory
structure - requiring setback variances (side * street)
a) Side Setback
required 10*
proposed 3.1'
variance 6.9* or 69%
b) Street Setback
required 30'
proposed 18'
variance 12' or 40%
Hardcover Review
a) 0-75 area 4650 sf
existing hardcover 100 sf or 2.1%
b) 75'-250' area 9975 sf
existing hardcover 3300 sf or 33%
allowed hardcover 2494 sf or 25%
proposed additional hardcover 478 sf (19.9* x 24') or 5%
Total Proposed Hardcover 3778 sf
The proposed addition to the existing garage trill also include
major structural repair to the existing garage such as an entire
new foundation. I have advised the applicant that I could not
recommend approval of major repairs of a non conforming structure
that encroaches 7* into the County Road right of way. In fact,
I further advised Sarenpa that even if major structural repair
were not required for the existing garage that I could not
recommend attaching a major addition of equal size to a structure
encroaching 7* into the County right of way.
It was my recommendation to move the existing structure at the
time the foundation is replaced attaching the additional stalls
and locating the entire structure at least 5* (same as garage
to south of shared turnaround) off County right of way with all
doors facing away from street. Sarenpa stated my proposal vfould
be too costly and that he would lose a mature tree located
approximately 20* to 25* to the east of existing garage. After
I inspected the site, it would appear that the applicant's two
stall addition will either require the removal of the tree or
cause its demise. The applicant asked if he could still apply
a s*r»/< nIenH hi q to the Council.
■SUM
#694 Sarenpa
Page 2
Variance J. ••• J
i>s.i
Alternativee Available to Applicant
1 - Relocate existing garage 5* off County Road right of way
and 5* from side property line» seek approval of 1 or 2
additional stalls and a second story over two stalls of
width for storage area and owner agrees to sign off on
a resolution limiting second story to storage use and
never to be used as a residential unit.
2 - Keep existing garage and make any simple maintenance repair
no major structural repairs - build a separate two stall
garage to the east of existing slab (adequate turnaround,
41* to County road) no setback variances required only
hardcover variance of additional 528 sf and require sign
off on resolution as noted above.
;,vj
rm-.
i »
Qs'.v
3 - Remove existing garage and relocate 3/4 stall garage to
east of slab and require sign off on resolution for second
story storage.
v\'y
» 4' w'b'• ' ?. <
. ‘f.
• I
..•i
J
!Ui TZ _____-—
;‘f
1 ■_.
_ JUN24S®
r jj
ii
1 1
1
1i7, PRESENT USE —i-i : .1
t----------------------------------------------------------1:
HC 1233 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
DEPT OF PROPERTY TAXATION
A-AOS GOVtRNMCNT CENTER
MINNEAROLIA, MN 994S7
i.ltT SlZf
I CCRTIPV THAT 7M« MCTS tttPIIESCNTIO OM THIS
CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE RtRRI<-
SENTATION OF INFORMATION At IT ARREARS TNIS
DATE ON TNE RECORDS OF TNE NfNNSRIN COUNTY
FINANCE DIVISION. TO THE SEST OF MV RNONkEOOE
AND BEUEF.
NENNERIN CO. OERT. OF RRORERTY Tl
FEE OWNER TAX PAYER/
MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS
/•y- //7- 2.S-
kj/.94*^4.
sJof/^y..Vitl^
\ I
^ _ k//fyZAr4i
S»/9?a
tO/fyz4ryi
*nyJt^
^Z4B g its.
II,mtBs,.i
Il
#694
t
O toy n
€♦ -
J K*
O
M 1 3O H-
^ r ^ II
I
•! ('4fcl \)
M
(j
t;.'^
M
/?/ >i^ 5/
*S
*»r►*• :ru CO
^ •'«
>?
1
r'.
i> *>•
TO;Planning Commission
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth
* .i
DATE:July 14, 1982
SUBJECT: #695 Guenther Roth, 1428 Baldur Park Road ~ Variance
Zoning District - LR-lc
implication as proposed requires a lakeshore setback variance
and hardcover variance within 0—75' setback area for proposed
garage + work shop
a) Hardcover
1 - Total area Lot 8 (residence lot) » 7847 sf
0-75' area » 3750 sf existing hardcover 250 sf
75'-250' area = 4097 sf allowed 1024 sf
existing 1080 sf
2 - Total area of platted lots 17 6 18 » 31,250 sf
Wetlands/Marsh area
0-75' area
allowed
existing
proposed
additional
24,064 sf
7,186 sf
0 sf
668 sf
2,540 sf
1,872 sf
or
or
or
9%
35%
26% increase in hardcover
Total Hardcover Lots 8, 17 6 18
Total Area 0-75'
Allowed
Existing
Proposed
Total Proposed Addnl.
10,936 sf
0 sf
918 sf or 8%
2,790 sf or 26%
1,872 sf or 18%
b) Lakeshore Setback
required =
existing =
structures
turnarounds
75'
24*
22*
5'
variance 51'
variance 53'
variance 70'
or 68%
or 71%
or 93%
(proposed structure)
(proposed turnaround)
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Ekhibit F
Exhibit G
Exhibit H
Application
Property Owners List
Plat Map
Survey Lot 8
Survey Lot 17 & 18
Site Plan
Proof of Combination
Building Elevations
4
1695 Roth
Page 2
Variance
The Roths are the owners of combined Lots 8, 17 & 18 (Exhibit G).
A survey of Lot 8 (Exhibit D), the residence lot# was obtained
from an earlier varismce review for a proposed lakehhore
addition but building permit was never issued. In fact# the
hardcover variance was approved based on the additional area
of the 2 lots across the road. In review of the survey of
Lot 17 & 18 (Exhibit E) most of that area is either marsh
land or in the 0<-75* protected area.
The existing garage is a marginal two stall garage. The house
has no basement or accessory shed to satisfy residential storage
needs, thus the reason for the proposed two stall garage being
52* deep. If the new garage is allowed to be built on Lots 17
and 18 than the grassed rear yard of Lot 8 can remain undisturbed
and another typical Baldur Park garage need not be crowded
bet%raen Lots 7 ft 9. Please note these are legally combined
lots so a variance to Ordinance 31.310 is not required.
Adequate turnaround is provided on the site and the additional
much needed storage area is also provided. I would strongly
suggest trimming down size or structure as the garage will be
almost as large as residence.
Staff Recommendation
e
To approve the lakeshore setback and hardcover variance application
of Guenther Roth based on the following findings ft hardships:
1 > No additional land available.
2 - Location of new garage and turnaround will provide
less disturbance of environmentally sensitive property.
3 - New location and use will be safer and less hazardous
than existing garage use.
and subject to the following conditions:
1 - Owner is placed on notice that the City will not consider
any further variances for the property.
2 - Owner obtain a demolition permit for removal of existing
garage.
3 - Structure be trimmed back - ei ther to decrease work shop area
On grade level or require removal of second story. Based
on hardcover concerns it would be better to trim back
grade level (25* x 35') and allow a limited second story.
4 - Owner agree to sign off on resolution agreeing that second
story will never be used as a residential unit.
I
n
I r LAND USE PLANNING
ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION
EXHIBIT
1. PROPERTY ADDRESS TIa! llup Qlfj/ tLri
ua«l 4M«rtrctM aCa iLr«y,^fcik«l | "
2. APPLICANT lu- (jueiJTlf. </')/^')9^9
ibtUag AMraat Jin/c/u^ ^An/f G /^(Cvvo
If AfpIlMM la aat ouMr. asplala
3. OWNER Cru^.-Tl.. P.tl
Nil»W AMraaa
»?/- 9^g»/fVc ‘-
Date Property Acquired f)[\jsy oto«th/Yaar)
I (do) (do not) also own otner adjacent parcels of land
4. AGENT"—____________________________
rtra
S . NOTICES Owiitf ka aaat toi Appl leant (kmar
O . 16. PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT C'e f./cle^T,aL
1. PRESENT USE MaWantUl X (Othar) ‘_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Vacant Lanf . Vacant lulldlntCt) _ _ _ Occupied Bulldtng(a)
Atant r
LIST OF EXHIBITS
PtwerlatjU^a
Initial Apalie^>^yn
■ujt iiiolud#:
1 —- ApplIeNtion Fon
2 -- Fropwrey Oimwrp List
2 - - Cwrciflcatw of Suivoy
Foo ftocolpt #^(2£Zi
Otto Rooolvod ^ ^
ljEC^£,Jll£2Q^^Ji22l
^ Floe mp
5 _ Uivontory
6 Stoff rtnmmf
OthT Infoiaatlott
7 ^ ___________
0 ___ _____________
9 —
10 _________
CITY OF ORONO
8. DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST oi'
^ aatakllak naw ana __ aantlmia ar aapand anlatlag uaa ——<
— naw ^ add an __ raaodal __ raplaca
Describe request in detail; Q./i.r,. . . T. -. t / /
T.?'•
■f • '
► .
a--.A‘e lA’
t ; •.•-If fi 'i'qorf ‘ * ‘
idA ♦ v>di«iAj'.'ov
' ■ ■ 'it'"-
•v j *
•: vf IT«/if ’
. •' T i d' ,
■*
*■ -
-.f-
Ti^-W V< »vaK
EXHIBIT#695
)
LIST OF EXHIBITS
F D—erlption
ynltlal Apttllcatloti
wuBt inelu4U:
___ Application Fom
Froporty Oimoro List
CcrtlfUoto of Survoy
Foo Rocoipt #
Otto Mcclvod ^ ^ ^
By ^iLOac.
yrcff Ii|[or —tloil
» o£ land! ^
LAND USE PLANNING
ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION
CITY OF ORONO
F.O. M, CfytWt Hy, Mliwof >>323
EXHIBIT
4n-7357 #695
Wittiietn—! H mm first rssf tha sttarlwf bitetMClM AiMt. OoayUu Ic«w 1 • 19
(iyiM or Frtoc). If ■oo4of, otcoeh lattor or ethor tnfofMClen to bottor
Ooooribo yo«r rooooot. UMeoylata opolloatleoa will not bo aeeoptod.
'"7 O O
1. PROPERTY ADDRESS /V^8 /^aIDuP rAd/
Lo|ol ^oooriytlon o ImII bo oboon on ocudio4 Survoy» CKhlbit 3
2. APPLICANT (ruenTn^^ Phono VP/ -
-------------------f ■ -
Mlllnt AMroot JleJc/uM. O
If Ayflloant to not ownor, anplaln
3. OWNER *Mo
MtUInt MOrooo
nw«. y?/.
Date Property Acquired ri\£s.j _ (Honth/voor)
I (do) (do not) also own other adjacent parcela of land —
LIST OF EXHIBITS
£ PoaeriDtlon
Initial Applleotlon
■uat includo:
1 Application Fom
2 ___ Froparty Oimara Liat
3 ___ Cartifieata of Survey
Jj^Faa tacaipC
Data Racaivad ^ ^
By
Staff If^formatlon
4 ___ Flat Hap
5 _ Inventory
6 Staff CoaMtnta
4. AGENT
fim
Otbar Infomation
HiiliiiS Addraaa
Applicant ■A Ovnar
PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT ^ f^}cley^T,aL -tt—----------
PRESENT USE toolfontui _2L_ <Othor>
Vacant Vacant luilding<a)Occupied Building(a)
41-6 882 ;ji:
HI___________
CITY 0F..0R0N0 1
8. DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTOttTED mllSTRIlCTION COST S "JC> ijov- ori
^ aatabliab nan uaa _ aontiniaa or aapand aniating uat _ build nan ^ add on _ raaodal ^ raplaca
Describe request in detail:
Lot Area Ut Width Hardcover
9. VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED to do tha raguaatad Wofh
/ f^tboob (_/:^^t____si4o O'***' -------------------------------------------------
10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS yror-tln, eo^lUno* «tcb zoning OoA. rogntron«.co:
L\.rl a^A Ae»A C.H
12, Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK on nol^rlng proyortloo onO on tho nolghborhood In ganoroli |
iltMilii},’ ^cT, <dA G-ALijlA£^k—piir r n n • .y.-
The APPLICANT and the PROPERTY OWNER must
Tbo Amicm horoby ogmoo to ptnwlfo oil InfOmotlon
rogntroi or roguootnf by thn Zoning Adnlnlttrotor, ogrooo
to poy oil fooo onZ/or wwo nol oaponooo InourroZ In rovlon
of tklo opptloatton. on« ooRlfloo thot tho infomoclon
oopplloZ to trao onZ oomot to tho boot of hlo knonloOgo:
sign and date this application.
Tho OHIin horoby aehnonlodgon on4 ogrooo to tl^ oppUcotloo
ond furthor oothnrlooo rnooonoblo oncry onto tho ptoporty
by City otoff, cononltonto, ogonta, coMUolon naabora,
and Co«Hiell naebaro for pnrpnoao of lavaatlgotlon and
varlCloatlon of thlo rognoot:
r
\
EXHIBIT b #327
f'^r . I.i'v .'•* 1.1.-..- A r>.
^ ^ • f•
I.* .: •• 1:. Cr*;j.“v, /: \ r. t.-.
■
*•••
.1 >
‘ CcTti?'ic:.te of Surve;,*:
I herct:/ ti-t this
Ic a tn.e ar/J '“'>rr*jct ror.ru-
sort:.Ucr. cf rur-.e,. -if tho
8, Mr'e ; I,
j^t*r Cy ."jc Xi o*«
of £.11 oxlctlr-i: ; li*. ir./t, 1
tn;*, tScroor, It ;:&»t n*>x ./.ur-
porX Ic rh&t. c;h«r inprovv.jtnxs
or iT.cro-cK.Tifr.Xc.
Sfhloi 1" = 30*
Dut« : T-:*:-??
Oojv'or. h. Cofrir. rvt^’lc. *^;.4
t Iron t.arKrtr
.ui—ivor i\-^T.r,^r
IjoVii .Mr.r.rjot-1
'1‘ ■
,
; ‘
iSkr-1
EXHIBIT
C'^rtlflritH of 3«rAjy
Ter G’.wnthir Rcth
of Lotn 17 Lr,\ 1'-^, ”loe< P, ?ir':
V.er.r-joln County, Kinnasotti
^ »a fitmm 0tt pMt
ttmUS 9W«« /« /A>#
L
I herwly certify thr.t ti.ir is a true anti correct
roorosentatlon of a uur%’cy of t'u bcunduriee of
Cots 17 «Hnd 12, Block 2,’TaICur rtrk", and the
locriticn of uLl oxlstlr.?: tullcirrs tr.arccn. It
does net rroj'oort to rhou <3tf.‘ir iaarovciants or
er.croachjoentf.
Seals: 1" = 50*
Date j A-17-P^
Gordon Coffin
: Iron varker
I^nd Surveyor and Planner
Conb uake, Kinnesota
#695
■w» rw'*
►
'^PAcemo^ o^’ ^'-''^^''y ‘
■ -••V'. ' ' ^ ‘ '''<§
.v-y^
• * V .: * •,*,.
: .•
> V,' \> : . (•
J2
EXH)»l I
•or Uu^i'-h^r 5-^-‘ •
of lotn IV M l : , *U.<*< , ’. Ic
*•
■
S£-^'
fe'-.
ri:''
. «v ,l,V rmrti.., vnat t-.i:- ’ •■. ' tr’M nru
» j:.T«-.y«nt.lioi. or a sw-v.v ;•:• v’ij
iX>'ts 17 and iniicll'2,'’;Vt».i.r Pbp*^, 3W tH#-*
» li-.t j.m of m:1 MxiaUr./. l-jllciln.-a tr.yr»on. It^
349f/*M ,1 .,! rol fp.ui'ort. to eh<»i< oth »r lirjryve«i».'itl!|Or »
, ..r:..irr.ri#nir.
i'-'s
^'-•v
'‘i:
i<V
JUL-6BC
CITY OF OROMO
%%
!•/'..
jc*» I- i
a."' .
o : > Pi'f :
, •«! S*.:% •’"f »»•- ’lffrf'*T
•• A' f ^ •**'m
msm
. t
/:■ \
*' jis.''■y V *V • <
i >*> vV*.;
r«
EXHIBIT
exhibitZ2 <■ »iii
April 24 19 79
VtJlNON T. HOPPI
nNANCC DIVISION DIRECTCR
lie COURTHOUSI
MINNEAPOUS, MINNESOTA 55A15
DEAR sir ;
I HEXm MiUrt R«UE« F« i> OatWHM*.' C®BINRD) RSSRSSHENt -W TH*
following described lands
District 38 - Baldur Park. Lots 8, 17 and 18, Block 2
Property I.D. » 0B-U7-23 34 0011,
08-117-23 34 0026 and
VILLACS CH niSTRICT 38 !! Orono
/yntfa
^turk or in
Ft* 1980 TAX YEAR
• 1I
i
TAX PAYER’S ADIRESS ^ayzata, MN 55391
CCMBINSD CURRENT VALUES
r.
H OR
N.R.NOi SCMP.
•
LAND BUILDING MACHINE
total full
and true
•Stioo
TOTAL
assessed
f-
< 1%•Jf 7fi-o /
i l
j ? Vo ?'/»
/f^
• • '
1
1 . ^ j
6y.
r,
fc-
T
Mm
i
f.
»•
4 /
h
r o ^
12-
<sma Vi
E>ci:t!^:7 /f
• ••V4 ^
- 1 iI • (
JU.-6BK
CITY OF ORONO
m
!
I
I
.Moniuattiask
,.»^*»• •• •
I
TO:Planning Commission
FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth
DATE:July IS, 1982
1 SUBJECT:#693 Theron Hinellne,
Conditional Use Permit
Zoning District - RR-lB
Application - a) Conditional Use Permit (Ordinance 31.700 excavation
and alteration of a designated wetland.
b) Variance (Ordinance 31.831) Applicant must
also ask for a variance to ordinance since
excavation and alteration of wetlands are
no permitted.
Action of Planning Commission ~ No Action • Work Session
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A
BkhLbit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
Application
Statement of Adjoining Property Owner
Wetlands Map
Resolution - Orono Oaks Plat
Plat Map + Drainacyeway sketch
Plat
Pond - Plans
Background on Application
The current application involves a subdivision that had a long
4 *^2?^ of problems for both applicant and the City commencing
in 1971 and completed or finally approved on November 14, 1978.
Staff concerns at thi end of that long review although noted
in the files were set aside in the hopes of dealing with them
at the time each building permit was issued.
legal sized folders filled to the maximum
I Will attempt to very briefly review these problems that may
help to depict the environment and temper of the City staff at
the time of that final plat approval.
1 -Btages of plat review held prior to maplng of
designated wetlands. Aerial maps were used to determine
existing wetlands - subject area was used as a pasture
land for horses. No visible signs of a wet area.
2 -In 1975 the landowner/applicant brought the City to
resulting in an out of court settlement,
no doubt about it hindered normal review of the plat.
3 -The same engineering firm represented both the City and
the applicant during the majority of the 7 year period.
In 1977 the City contracted with Bonestroo & Associates ilrm.
I
f I
' itj
.ill
:‘l
,1
fi
L
#693 Hlneline
Page 2
Conditional Use Permit
4 -In September of 1978, staff and applicant's engineer met
on the site to discuss the subject wetland. Staff
(Gaffron, Jacobs & Mabusth) advised that the wetland
(now designated on City maps) was indeed a rightful
wetlands based on surrounding elevations and local watershed
and the green vegetation. Knudson, applicant's engineer,
refused to accept staff opinion finding no standing water
and stated he trould take the matter directly to Council.
The issue was dropped, the wetlands undesignated on the
formal plat. Staff somewhat relieved knowing that a
house primary and alternate septic area had been located
on each involved lot.
5 -Since approval in 1978, the subject wetland has contained
a large volume of standing water - staff has slides
1980 and snap shots 1981 and a site Inspection today
will reveal the same volume of water.
Present Application
The applicant proposes the excavation and "reshaping" of the
designated wetlands involving Lots 11, 12 6 13, Block 1, of
the Orono Oaks plat to create a wildlife pond and in the
applicant's mind an aestheticly more appealing one than the
natural, undisturbed wetlands. Ordlnemce 31.831 prohibits the
alteration of such protected areas so applicant must be
advised of the need to apply for a variance also.
The watershed is extensive, please refer to my rough drawing
(Exhibit E) that designates the drainageway. The City Engineer
has been asked to review the proposal 2md the effects it may have
on an important reservoir or retention pond for the drainage
system. If at the work session, ^lantung Commission feels
the pond suitable for wildlife use, the applicant will be
ashed to submit his plan for review by the U.S. Hennepin County
Soils Department Office (similar to the agency^s review of
the Veon wildlife pond). The M.C.W.D. has also been
informed of the proposed application and has been asked for
early imput for your review.
The wetland today, if you refer to the plan for proposed pond
is approximately at the 942 elevation. The applicant
proposes to excavate to the 932 elevation and with an invert
elevation/culvert at 939.2 the pla would be to decrease the
area of the pond by making it deeper. Is the retention capacity
affected? Lot 12 in its present state is unbuildable because
of the setback requirements from the 942 elevation. Lots 11
and 13 are already developed.
i
9\I * \ ^ ^
m. rn^m *,m m
cm OP OROMO, MINNESOTA £XK1BIT
Land Use Application
A
CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property)
/c^fe .g- Niu.Address
Legal Description \"X. l^cV V
/jjAje (\Ayt JelAPPLICANT Name
$30.00 a) Res. Acc. Use
$50.00 b) Institutional
(Church I Sch.
etc.)
Mailing
Address j o^OA^n <^aV> V>
^g^Lmm mi m m
tAWa.. A.AJi
OiNER Name ^ ^_________ Tel #_
Nailing
Address
Present Zoning
jC $75.00 c) Duplex Cr/nlq
PO. d) Land Alteration
(grading, fil
ling)
$100.00 e) Com/lnd. Use
PRD/PID - See fee schedule
Variance $50.00
Present Use
Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request
Specify Ordinance Requirements _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Explain your request and reasons for saaw
loCAi ACeA
"fo A>LTe\ I OL y\<4 re<Avipp^
Qua loco oceA q/v .W
4(0 far»l<jl*.£p.<>vA V^ca I r nn ,(appealiOt)
VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity
____ Lot Area ____ Setback Front__
Width
Side Rear
Other, explain
Specify hardships to property
9
V, -n ejf
i ...k:
Vbh;■ r«.uu; vyr
r-1
lib^i
CWk'*'#/fc J .IC. * ‘
A • ‘ t ; (
fo fc»A ■
>'* " -• f.
■■'r «>■,!
. • • -■
* -'#p V-• V -■ ■'
i rtr
’ ^ ‘ i
r^JT 'j V** ’■ '
EXHIBIT
ONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION
$30.00 a) Res. Acc. Uso
K
$50.00 b) Institutional
(Church, Sch.
etc.)
$75.00 c) Duplex Cr/Blq
pd. d) Land Alteration
(grading, fil
ling)
$100.00 e) Com/lnd. Use
PRD/PID - See fee schedule
Variance $50.00
l\\
Rear
■It
LOCATION or PROPOSAL (or property)
Address /gfe-C tf<H<.
Legal Description o(^cV V_<t>W><vXj
i ill- ''
APPLICANT rTiAJt^ V)<0^ Jel ^
$50.00 b) Institutional
(Church, Sch.
etc.)
Ad^m CjCoA^n4^Aj^I"TAkrr^A*7^^^^
OWNER Nane _n
Mailing
Address
^ $75.00 c) Duplex Cr/Blq
pd. d) Land Alteration
(grading, fil
ling)
$100.00 e) Con/Ind. Use
PRD/PZD - See fee schedule
Variarice $50.00
Present Zoning Present Use
Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request
Specify Ordinance Requirements _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Explain your request and reasons for same I Q*l‘'£/
gOTp” loco g«-cA OfA swtkf.ot pnnfl ,(QP0ealiO$-
\/4 1'■£<». OmA
VARIANCE required - extent of nonconformity
Lot Area_ _Setback Front_ _ Side
Width _ _
Rear
Other, explain
Specify hardships to property
SUBDIVISION application Residential Othdr, explain
No. of Lots
CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail
MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION
(Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting)
Application completed
Plat map section
Certificate of survey of property
sketch location and setbacks of
proposal
Construction plans, if applicable
5.
6.
Certified Property Owner's list c
owners within (300') (150')- fron
Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance
A-603 Government Center
Stamped, legal sized envelopes(#1
pre-addressee^to each of,the name
. .■ .'_ -. -. .^•. — . • »- m ■»-*-«^^ **~ >**• *-*■» **“
e
EXHIBIT
1335 Orono Oaks Drlva
Long Lake, Mlnnaaota 55356
June 21, 1982
I* Stephen Meelund, the owner of Lot 13, Block 1 and Lot 10,
Block 1, Orono Oaks, do hereby agree to participate with the construction
of a pond on ay land with Theron Hlnellne, owner of Lota 11 and 12,
Block 1, Orono Oaks.
« j*t*- ••• *-»
P@[IDWfg[r|
JW22BS
CITY OF ORONO
Stephen B. Neslund
'■'V‘
#693
II
fa
E• V * ' *. *L/A Pi I i I _.,C....„
r* r - ''TV-
■* V-.1 ''jiJt
‘Cl** ■•If •■
V 'AK it-. •■*
■KV,'.
<- > -
wa;
1^. p
..r^
t.
> '‘-
1 \
Wi
^ - *•• .• I
Vj- '^ ».’- -
^A^>
p
: A>
;
;v4 -j
> '* '
W"
ptMm
r • ».^*V-^ '' ST
•*A<\
V
V
-i-
» .• •• * . ^
iI
r.
rj
%
I
EXHIBIT
RESOLUTION NO. 957
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PUT OF ORONO OAKS
WHEREAS, th« City of Orono is s municipal corporation
organised and existing under the la^is of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted
subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development
of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application
for a subdivision plat by Richard Neslund (Colpepper Land Company)
and Ralph Carlson Companies, Inc., the aubdivider; and
WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of
the platting regulations of the City, including:
1. Plattii^ of the property into Single Family Residential
lots meeting the soning code performance standards for the
RR-IB soning use district, including a density ratio of at
least 2.0 acres of dry-buildable land per dwelling unit and
site Investigation to determine on-site sewage treatment
system capabilities on each such lot.
2. Dedication on the plat of rights of Vay for public
streets and roads, shown as Orono Orchard Road North.
3. Creation of a new private read shown on the plat as
Outlet A, to be known henceforth as Orono Oaks Drive.
Concurrent wiA the creation of this private road,
the siMivider has dedicated to the City, a Road and
Utilities Easement (ftdiibit A) granting to the City
permanent access, inprovement and utility easements over
said Outlet. The City does not intend to acquire or
open said road as a public roadway but does intend to
assure permanent access for emergency v^lcles, public
service vdiicles and other invited guests of the
Individual owners' of said road.
4. Creation of a new Private Driveway Easement (Exhibit B)
for ingress, egress end utility purposes over Lots 10 L 13
In favor of Lots 9 & 10.
Pi.—. «■» ^ <p'p>4^V^
•**i-** • Homeowner** Aeeocletloo to be knoim
«*ure a continuing etanderd of quality equal to the
•• • P-rt of thl.1uSJvl.lon^ othetwlae may be required from time to time by
Ordinance of the City. ^
"drainage eaaement.'* and drainage and utility easement.".
«*y of . n«.,. «,d co».«v.tion
semMt (suilblt C) providing for limitation, on the
ri!d ?5n^**^***!^ «nd/or dratnagptay. daaerlbad cbarata
waSSSeS"!" * "• •»0/or "drataag.
IL SlISfJJfJ.®' Agraeiiant providing for
__l^jraent for tha InatalUtlmi of
eartain RoaAiay tpprovodnta to Orono Ordiard load
«*«««• of grada of .aid *oJTS
lnt.r..etlon of .aid toad «lth tb.
Badlcatlon Fa. In thi
iS'thriJS*,®' *“ ''•floMo Additional Coat. Incurrpi
•!Lw* *** P*oceaalng and ravlaw of thla aubdlvlali application according to Ordinance.
the dtv ” resolved, that the City Council of
Horeby apprpvea the plat of Orono oSa RennoBln
County, Hlnnaaota; aubjeet to the following condition.• *
fc* P***^^®S coaq>letlon of the agreed upon ImorovMan^a
SaHlT*thr**“^ toad, tha aubdlvldar ahallTloa. to all
^5fi! ^ PO"to«t Intoraactlon on Outlot A and .hall
irS^ lat«.actlon and roadvay aeroaa iSt
eonnaet Orono Orchard Road and tha na. ftlvata^d
Stv *^'**«*?4®* **“ la>rovanaota aatlafaetory to tha^ '
^ t«apor.ry Intoraactlon acroM lot 12
of firs ‘Sd'ST'"' •“hAlvld.r and/or tha
A .hall b. ipiiid S *’*™*”*"‘ Intaraactlon on OutSt
>V--i i^ -^Tir rrtaaiitf.-^irirr-^'’
:■ -C y-' '■
\u4m
•tioQ to bo knoim
>r purpoooo to
lining, ropolrlog,
ito Rood ond othor
itononco shall
tf equal to tha
t of this Std>divisioa
to tiaa by
ga aaaaBanta" and
BO and Conaarvatioif^
■itatiooa on tho
sacribad tiiaraia
i/or "drainago
bigiK
■ant providing for
la installation of
Ordiard Road
Risad to iaprovo
Road irith tho
cation Poo in tho
i Coats ineurriKi
t this subdivision
*a City Council of
mo Oaks, Rannopin
tions:
Km Inprovananta
ihall elooo to all
tatlot A and shall
'•^•ay acroaa lot
a nav Privato Road
iafaetory to tho
on across lot 12
ividar and/or tho
^section on Outlot
Wo accass or curb cut shall be pamittad onto Orono
axcept for the new Private Road (for Lots 1-9,
11 & 12) and the new Private Driveway (for Lots 9, 10 & 13)
septic systems on most lota nay require
additional testing and/or installation of innovative designs
such as mound systems, which testing and/or design will be
required before Issuance of any building permit. This
condition is required for compliance with Ordinance 210
because the subdivider has not provided complete soil boring
information for determination of water table depth and
because the areas previously tested for percolation on certain
lots have been disttirbed during site grading operations.
Comtj Rrcord.1^. SfIcJ’^^or'befw l**l^tSg2tli.r
St grated by thi. IlMolutlon .h.11 «tplr. If eh. pl.t has
not been filed by the date apecified above. In that event, it will
^S,3r:SJrr^l“* • -PPl^-tion With tha City of Ori«, for""
Dated this fourteenth day of Iteveidier
William B. Van Rest, Mayor
ATTEST:
• Cl erk/Admlnis tra tor
lall b« peniltted onto Orono
now Private Road (for Lota 1-9,
Driveway (for Lota 9, 10 & 13).
yatena on noat lota nay require
*fsllation of innovative deaigna
tearing and/or deaign will be
■ny building permit, ibia
iq>llance with Ordinance 210
Bt provided complete soil boring
% of water table depth and
fcated for percolation on certain
Lng site grading opera tiona.
enslty. Lota 2 & 3, Block 1,
ta even though being leaa
■th the atipulation that all
it and no setback variancea
a
filed with the Hennepin
r before Kay 14, 1979 together
y of thia Resolution and
• B, & C aa noted above.
ahall expire if the plat has
Dve. In that event, it will
vitdk tiie.City of Orono for
Ven Ilest, Mayor
I':Mu.
> ■/•
Planning Commission
PROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth
DATE:July 15, 1982
SUBJECT: «696 Hildur Hollander, 250 Hollander Road - Subdivision
Zoning District RR-IB
.■%. Area - 10.2 acres
Application - Subdivision - Plat - 5 lots -4.
Brief Review of Application
Mrs. Hollander received preliminary approval of the first stage.
Holly Acres plat of 10 lots in 1979. The current 5 lot platting
of Outlot C was originally included in that review and for tax
reasons Hollander excluded the 10 acre area for subdivision.
I have reviewed the resolution approving Holly Acres, erclosed
for your review, and note no special directions concerning a
future plat of Outlot C. It is regretable that the resolution
fed.ls to require the inclusion of Outlot B in the current
application. Outlot B is 5.4 acres in area and contains the
new Hollander home, farm house and accessory farm building and
a rental house. I will check with the City Attorney but I'm
afraid the jurisdiction of the current plat is limited to Outlot C
area.
The review appears to be simple as all inq>rovements are in an
approved by the City Engineer. There are no designated wetlanda.
Septic testing will be required for all 5 lots. Staff will
check out a school line boundary problem that involves Lot 2
on my sketch.
A public hearing has been scheduled for August 16, 1982.
d ~ Subdivision
he first stager
. 5 lot platting
m and for tax
tubdivision.
xesr e^.closed
ioncerning a
:he resolution
t current
lontains the
i building and
rney but I'm
.mi ted to Out lot C
i
Its are in an
.gnated wetlands.
Staff will
rolves Lot 2
.i:.- -p:
i, 1982.
0^
:
!
\
CITY OF ORONO
JU. 9BS
jiy^'
CITY OF ORONO
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM
#696
date rec*d'7'9 -
py-j -j n I
fee rec'd
APPLICANT Name HUdur F -ffcHav'icIerQ^rs. Rci^J Telephone
Address '^ofldiLxci<°f f^acL ^>2. <7 5 \ ^ 7/
PROPERTY Name
OWNERS
cSl Telephone ff/’ 3 • ^ ^ .i
Mailing
Address
(Attach list of more than one)
PROPERTY LOCATION
Street Address
Legal Description
(FID)
Du-rlc-f- C Hc:/h
l(S- ~ 'i ~
EXISTING LAND USE
Number of Tax Parcels _ _ _ _ _ _
Development Size /Q
ChQ.
Present Use (check)
Acres Dry Land
Acres Wet Land
Acres Total, all parcels
Residential; no. of units
Other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Present Zoning Dist. KR~ (3
PROPOSAL lot line rearrangement only (no new building sites)
^ subdivision for new building sites
number of building sites: On e existing units
proposed gross density
minimum lot size:
proposed use: (check)
new units
total units
units per J<!. acres
square feet dry buildable land
residential
other (specify) _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'• i
MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION
(Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting)
A.
Application completed
Preliminary Plat information on
a certificate of survey
Certified Property Owner's list of
owners within 350* - from Hennepin
Dept, of Finance A-603 Govern-
tient Center
Stamped, legal sized envelopes (FIO)
pre-addressed to each of the names on
t.ie above list.
5. Application fee per current fee schedule:
sketch plan only
2 lot prelim, plat
$50.00
150.00
200.00
+ $10/lot
)r 3+ lot prelim, plat
(sketch plan included)
f Additional improvement
review fees per fee _•
schedule $ >S.4|^Ca LUi
DATE APPLICANTS SIGNATURE
DATE 9, /? owner's SIGNATURE
Applicantr hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by
the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning commission
LVfLzaoa_V
F
s’'
X"-.X.
-hLfiu y..
S'ftf
cn :%o-
T9»f
gy'b^z
.?»•.i I
si
.-.s
\
\
CVJ \
T‘,-. rf^.
resolution no.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PlAT OF
HOLLY ACRES
WHEREAS the City of Orono Is a municipal corporation
organized ISfiutSg nn^r th. 1«» of th. Sent, of Mlnnozot., and
whereas, tha City Connell of the City of Orono haa ad^ted_
anbdlvlston regulation, for the orderly, econonie and aafe develop«mt
of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered
for a anbdlvlaion plat by Hlldnr P. Hollander, the aubdlvlder, and
WHEREAS, the aubdlvldw: haa cooipleted all requirement, of
the platting regulations of the City, including.
1. Dedication on the plat of rli^ts of way for public
streets and roads, shown as County Road b.
2 Creation of a new private road shown on the plat as
Outlets A, D, and E, to be known henceforth as
HOUANDER ROAD.
Concurrent with the creation of this private ^
subdivider has dedicated to the City a Road and Utilities
Easement ( Exhibit A) granting to the City per^nent access.
Improvement and utility easements over said Outlets, the
subdivider has created non-excluslve Ingress, egress.
drainage and utility easements (Exhibit
Outlets In favor of all abutting and/or benefiting lots.
and the subdivider has created certain
covenants (Exhibit B) wherein each of the
benefiting lot owners covenants and agrees to peTOnently
maintain and pay the cost of maintenance for said private
road.
3. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservatl^
Easement (Exhibit C) providing for ?"
use of wetlands and/or dralnageways described therein.
‘ 4. Execution of a Subdivider* s Agreement providing
Installation of private road Improvements as a condl n
of subdivision approval.
, X V.
« B I • M •
TTiTi
VilW*
•I
r«k»T^r
•V
—III I I I
‘^pmiliiipid^'■x.- - , ' -#1 - .■<•:•■■
Resolution No.
Page 3
^f|i0 approval granted by this Resolution shall expire If
the plat has not been filed by the date specified above.
event. It will be necessary to file a new application with the City
of Orono for subdivision review.
Dated this day of . 1979.
William B. Van Nest, Mayor
ATTEST;
Walter R. Bensvn, Clerk/Administrator
"S
'Vi
• r«
:r' ■ t
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR
CHARLES V. KROGNESS
IN THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 3-! 17-23
I hereby certify Uwt this survey,
plan, or report >«s prepared by i»e
or under ncy direct supervtoton and
that 1 am a duly reii stered land
surveyor under the laws of the state
#385 ^c(gidik\MO
of Minnesota.
SCALE I"•100’
DATE MAY 4,1992
DA Turn MEAN SEA LEVEL
Cordon R. Coffin nt^FVc. t,06
11:1
i
Cordon R. Coffin Re<Ti*o. &0«4
Land Surveyor and riaaner
l.enf Lake, Minnesota
TC A^eETiiJc^
n
909D0M #. COEFm CO., IMC.
ENGINEERING 9 SURVEYING
LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA
■1u
ORONO OAKS RT. DOC. NO.
C.R. DOC. NO.
UM AIL •• msi AMUHn tXAl «.lp» Co-W-i... Ia C.. a AI.-AWIA CM»WAtl». »« •» f«
(IW • ■.” . - ,
l*»l Ijl 4*«rMt, *4
miUi'ii.i’Aio-A 1>>« V>»«A ll"« •* *a ’a WI-.LI !M'l»L •' Vl"*!"—« 5-Art.f . <lll^
l.fl IW A««rn<. ••
HuMAAAUArl,.
lo.lMllArl,, AA<lKtiA«
I AlLtAK* :> m.l» <AAt tu tl» A<!la I pCI r I of■I of ••fli'AlAf.
.i,*! IH L.«rMi, A1 a fii-.a.-ca »» 115 0/ '••'■
>• y-
t/». , ff traO'«'<'a<>* fw"«f-'» ff"
5Aoc**^ •V5 *
l«t >* oaa'aaf. 17 •I'v.iaA to aa lr.iar«atllw -if a 'i-a araiai
fo- .aia folnl A- to a aolM an t» la.t lioa of faia ioof-a.t Joanar ,
TA.»- -ana of lha laotAaatt SoaMa- of i-a laofotfal JoOftaf. f« J-afa- a' ^lAwt
ri:;an:tr:r-;a^:,!-nU ;; -
«n. 11-a a-a alon, fa -a.l . -. o- -ala lot 1 t. .«. a' *.A >-'"0.
atuva.ai to tia lo.arnaa-t lotto, tsaraa'
LS-iJL-i-rii i:;=:; s=-./ir;
aoottMitarl, alo«« t»a lati -a-tla-oO I l«a to t«a aolot o* aaa'~l-*.
■at ta«aa w«. f «a aoooaoad a-a aUilaa a» 7a«w ».l a-1 oaa.
M fafooaf to. aaaa am ao •aoao, aoaaa
at taa— «■ !>• o'at a-< faitaat -a.—a-f at taaa an fa fiat.
to oa tianoa At itt aroaar
fllMICt tUflllW.ala CMitf. ■loMWta
far.*, tartif, fa. fao.ao.aa a.M«a—. ..... 'af a'l jaaf ««
alat. »ataa i«'f "» - - - - - - - - --' ’- - - -'
for Iona aottrlboa a. tM.
waaff miHO*. fa«a.la Ua".». •looaw.a
Ooraawi to Ckaa.ar •••. .iwaatta taai of I.M. .Mt alat >a.
VlfIMM T. aoooi. tiMCToa
. aiwravaa fit
Aina A. PAIIHAN. lOmTY luan.OA
■Atl.tAAA W .mil.• la C m..., AlfoaaaM
. «r„f, fa. — -l.al" .'at af IfO* »A« *1'.. '■ "■“ *'>“
a'aloa. ...
wam A. jAMiaii. iuhtaaa v tiuia
COMT. AlCAMtA. A aoma M twMa. Maaatta
, ..roa, «o.if, fa. .A. -ifI- a'a. ».«A 0«t. -at fila. i- .'»•« «•'*
M ____
lUTI i* ■IlMSdtA
COtfirv mmiftn
Swr«*trof .
OROM. MMMSOtA
rUt of 9RQM OAKS oM
fiw«tln« Th«r«v* t*«U
MWC A. iOMVMHi, CMTV AtlOARfR
•y _____________________________-#693
Ha fototoin. Utttaa«l -at acaoo-ltaaoa aafort to t«lt
I. Ca.ltta, AtatiOaol of Aal»» Cartaa Coooaolot. it..
l» 4 iorr^tl .>» ^i4 loroiryi iMt •»» f \t40<9% '• ♦••I N a **A*'A«I'H of •
f«l. thot •!» «orr*ctl» »!».•« •* o«t*«At »Oif^4«f. J.»»o»
«r« («rr*<tiA ^ ^ VS?
1V—r>, 1
I«k *Ckm»Al*««»0 MfOA** « t*<>l l-4-^ —<