HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-08-1976 Planning Minutes4 > ^
r ■%
o
cmoponDNO» mdmbsoia
FBGULMl PLAHNING CCMSSICN MBETJNG HBU> JM 8, 1976
tii0 Or 10 Plming OoHidssicn mt a
tiio fblloidiig mmtiri proMnt: ChaitMn C
NnlMrs Ma P. HtioB, Dim OunUp* John G
Glorift NcDmld. Also pmsnt, Co wcil—i
nd Zoning Adninistvstor, Htok MAiich.
the above date with AITBNDANCE * 7:SS P.M.
Giithrie wed, HcDonald seconded, sfiproval of the
iites of the Mqr 17, 1976 neeting#
Qandssion Chainan Pessk «ided his tern as chaitnan
and was succeeded by the previous Vlce-Ghaiiwosnn,
who will conduct the neetings for the
next six aonths.
Chaitwonsn Dinlap mcMioed the cpeniJig of a Mblic
Hearing regarding the petition or Kexn Hoipe, Robert
Bathke nd Christopher Dahl. Ihe Zoning Adidnistrator
read the Notice of PUblic Hearing, preesnted the
Affidavit of Piblication, and reviewed the proposal.
Mbllc rr—nt was solicited by tin Oialr. (bawr Hoppe,
Attorney Hassel mid Builder Nits cm forward to review
the proposal with the Ooanission and the Mblic.
Oaicfc Bmr, 260S Nipleridge Lm, questioned the
of mcher access to the existing saiai bajr.
The Piddic Hearing was dosed at 7:44 p.a.
the Ooaaisslon ditoated the proposal: Fesek aoved,
Gudirie seconded, to lecc—nil approval of the lot
rearrsngmnt. The new arrangoMit will alln con
struction on the property idiile mting ainim lot
siae and requlTing a lot width varince of only 20 ft.,
easennt. Notion, Ayes (S) - Nqfs (0)
Chaiiwonn Dnlip amnaiced the opening of a Mblic
Hearing regarding the petition of Jam Sidwell. The
Zoning Adi£aistrator read the Notice of Rhlic Hearing»
presented the Affidavit of Mblication, and reviewed
the proposal. Mblic conant was solicited by the Chair.
Ndyne Ihtenon of 13S9 Park Drive stated that he was
concerned about plaomnt of n additional telling
MH houM Muld b. DiUoed tetter to«rd tli. strMt.
te **"**^*^ I'll, no dbjwstifln to tte proposod stfediiVislcn*
AinOVAL OF HINDISS
WBTIN: of S-17-76
iNsnudiioN OF iraf
OMIIVBRSON
FDBUC WAIONG - 7:36 P.M.
IBMHOFFB, EML
LOT n«su«iSBSfr
2608 6 2610 NmOODa lA.
Finuc lOARING - 7:46 P-M>
.1*
sXt-
I — rr - 111 r ■ T M - — --------------------- - I
MOWIES (f A FIMONG OOMSSION WBnNB HSLO JUtt «, 1078 - 2
2_^fs
builder» vli^ imil of a Jiow dwelling' iHateid of
«n laiattandad lot* oo^wHion of fhe proposed lot widths
to existing lots in Se^ Hill (he presented a chart
shoring all Forest Lake lot frontages), and payomt of
two sewer assessnents.
The Planning Goandsaion discussed precedence in approval
of a new st£division where both parcels would be below
80t of the required lot width and just above 80t of the
required lot area. Also noted was that the Ode Street
vacation was naant to cut dom on lot splits and sub-
stndaid lot useage, not to encouragf? 4ds .
« - f-.-
Goiaicilnan Welsh also discussed this precedence and the
intent of Goieprehensive Guide Plan in linitina the
: lakeshoredensity of lakeshore developnent. He stated ^t
has established preoedanoe for variances on existing
sti>standard lots, but would be carefbl of the establish
leent of new sid>standard lots. He added that there is
gecedam for refind^ sewer assMSMts when t^ were
to be incorrectly ^iplied. The Rblic Hearing
j^c\csQd at 8:11 p.n.
1
After continued discussion, Guthrie noved, Pesek seconded,
reconaendation of approval of this sii>division because the
lot area neets 801 of the requiraamt and because the pro
posed lot width is sinilar to existing lots in the area.
Hake argued that the only hardship he could see was
econonic and not of the land; that the owner could correct
the existing erosion probleai and could naintain the property
without a subdivision. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (2) (Im,
Dunlap).
aiairwoMm Dinlap called to order the Regular Meeting of the GALL TO ORCBR - 8:15 P.M.
Qrono Planning CoMdssion. BSGlSiAR ICBTIN6
Hake noved, Guthrie seconded, to recoawnd approval of tl
riprap application subject to using approved 12 inch or
larger stone naterial and sihject to the approval of all
other agencies. Motion, Ayes (S) - Nays (0)
SIEVE RQtiiW 3024 CASCO POINT 1
JOB BRAUN
3020 CASCO POINT
RIPRAP mMITS
Discussion developed concerning the substandard size of
this parcel coa|>ared to mailer adjacent properties as
well as the aenerally laidevsloped surroukUng land.
m
Hake noved, Pesek seconded, to table the natter idiile
the applicant nakes an effort to acqu^A« sone of the
adjacent mdaveloped property. Motion, Ayes (4) •
Nays (1) (McDonald).
J
OF A PLMimW (X^iflSSIOl
i»Ir. Hansen was jpTosant td.iia^crlbe Ms jwoppsai.
moved, Guthrie lM8Conded„ i6 rtfcttwond ap|«tf
area variance tfiii a 15 ft# sm Vaid variance to aiiw^
contruction of ah addition to his existing hone. Motion,
Ayes (5) * Nays (0).
Kr. Sime was present to describe the .
tills after-the fact proposal and to argoe against tot^la-
tion of a catch basin in the drain as
John GoThaidson, Itoad Supervipr. Glen Sauei^ 4104 Hijh-
wood was present to say that he has had no prwlen or
ccfflplaint about the drainage thru this »»»
problem of the private tile line was corrected last year.
- F!MZ 3
___,ip jw™
.085 S. BRDNN I
rAftlANCS
moved, Dunlap seconded, to wcoanwid apprwM ^
Conditicnal Use Permit for filling sAject to the following
1) Rifanoval of excessive fill from around existing trt
so as to prevent their destruction.
2) Pxotection of the graded banks to avoid erosion m
interforence with the sewer eascamnt.
3) Combination of lots 9 and 10 into cm .
4) Agreament of this and adjacent landowners to sign
•‘hold-harmless agreement*' concern^ any drainage
problems or maintenance of the
5) Investigation mnd xeco*endati« of tto Village
Engineer as concerns the need for a catch basm a
tho intersectiOT of the VUlage culvert and the
private tile line.
M5ti£7a, Piyes (5) - Nays (0).
Discussion developed concerning tM histoi^
tho “fact proposal including additional ^ing done
after the owner was notified to stop work. -
wiisci^ssed including access and erosion control. Trow ot
treated (creosoted) tiflhers in the water vms -
epresed. Pssek moved. Hake seconded, to reconnend approval
tiic terracing subject to tiie following:of
13 IsDtediate (within 30 days) removal of the creosoted
timber seawall. ..... j2) Fjepl£icement of the seawall wiA approved stone rip-
3) Appreval of the other agencies involved of both tho
seawall and the terracing.
Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0).
Ihiii item was acted upon by the Council withoirt referral
to tho Plarjiing Commission and was discussed here fer
iiifonnaticn only. Councilman Wel^ was present to a^ fer
the CoTmIssion's coaments on this pi^sal. JP'®
Commission expressed strong dwire for
stoo se*vsrage of the roof and park^ lot to the
west of County Itoad 19 instead of directing 1001 of the
Ka IIv