Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-17-1976 Planning Minutesm cm OF ORDNO, MINNESOTA REGULAR PLANNING GOMUSSION fCETING HELD MAJf 17, 1976 Ihe Or6no Planning Conmission met on the above date with the following raerabers present: Chaitman C. Paul Pesek, members Gloria McDonald, Brad Van Nest, John Guthrie, Gregg Hannah, and Zoning Administrator Henry Muhich. Absent: George Hosfield, Diane Dullap, John Hake, and Eugene Wcoley. Ihe City Council convened siimilthneously to qp^ the Piiblic Hearing in regards to the proposed Ring Route in Orono at 7:30 P.M. Mayor Searles called to order the two public hearings as per pid>lication: 1) the Riiig Route proposal, and 2) the consideration of a Multiple-Family Zoning Ordi­ nance. Ihe Public Hearing on the consideration of adopting a Multi- Family Zoning Ordnance was temporarily defend until the Public Hearing regarding the Ring Route was concluded. The Public Hearing on the Ring Route was concluded at 9:00 P.M. The Planning Conmission reconvened and Chairman Pesek com­ menced with the Public Hearing with regard to a Multiple- Family Zoning Ordinance at 9:05 P.M. The Zoning Administr tor produced the Affidavit of Publication. O Irs. Schroeder, who was in attendance, expressed an interest as to whether any provisions were made to include low and moderate income housing. Attention was directed to these provisions with vbich she concurred were adequate. Mr. Roberts suggested a change in the maximum percentage of two family structures in multiple zones. He recoomend^ a change from 201 maximum to an 80% maxinun. The Planning Commission felt more review would be necessary before any changes to the proposed draft cxxild be agreed upon. They were concerned d)out any possible ccmflict with our Compr^iensive Plan or our original intent with regard to adopting a Multi-Family Zoning Ordinance. After all comments were discussed and considered the Public Hearing was closed at 9:25 P.M. In order the expedite the issue Pesek moved, Guthrie seconded the Planning Conmission reconmend adoption of the Multi- Family Ordinance, subject to obtaining a statement from John Bergley of Wurman Chapman Associates as to any impact ai^ change in duplex percentage might have on our Comprehensive Plan or original intent of the ordinance. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). .^Oiairman Pesek called to order the regular meeting of the v^>Tlanning Conmission at 9:30 P.M. Von Nest moved, Hannah secxmded that the minutes of the Planning Conmission Meeting held May 3, 1976 be approved Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). ATIENDAN® - 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:30 P.M. RING ROUIE 6 MULTI-F)^LY PUBLIC HEARING - 7:30 P.M. RING ROUIE PUBLIC HEARING - 9:05 P.M. MJLTI-FAMILY ORDINANCE CALL ID OREER - 9:30 P.M. PLAifliNG ca»assioN APPROVAL OF MINUTES r-€ETING OF flay 3, 1976 S I, m BANNING OOfflSSIGN MEETING HEID MMf 17» 1976 • Page 2 |[|cin Lindsay of Kelly Avenue Holding Caif)any presented his proposal fbr a sidxlivision for Rezoning and Conditional Use Pennit applications for a PRO and duplex credit on parcel for structures within 200* of comiercially zon^ district. A copy of the deed conveying the subject property, revised plans and aerial photos of the area were presented. Ine Gondssion discussed resolving of maintenance responsibility and lack of adequate detail for obtaining conclusive approval of the PRD proposal. Van Nest moved, Hannah seconded racoanending conceptual approval for 3 single family uiits on the PRD parcel (1} Since this particular parcel is presently ocoq;>ied by ^ living units consisting of the existing duplex, only one additional single family mit could be addM until sudi time that the existing duplexes were removed from the property. Motion, Ayes (S) • Nays (0). The Goandssion continued with a discussion on the duplex credit proposal. The question was raised as to the conflict between the ordinance provisions for duplex credit and H lakeshore setback for multiple construction. Ill Pesek moved, Guthrie seconded to recommend approv.il of duplex credit in lieu of the single fmiiily units or the proposal. Mr. Pesdc expressed the presence of deliv- ^^^^ery ti^j^ks, garbagage trucks, garbage dunpsters, damaged autos for repur, etc. would create a nuisance and result in a dmir.uition of value of the residentially zoned district. He also stated tiiat the duplexes would pro­ vide an appropriate buffer zone from the existing single family residences to the south and therefore justify a ruplex credit. The recommendation for approval was made with the following conditions: 1) Maximum boat docUng - 2 boats per living mit or 4 boats per duplex. All 3 duplex units to be located within 200 feet of the oonmercially zoned district. The 3rd duplex unit would not be erected until the existing diplex on the property was removed. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (1) Van Nest - Abstain (1) McDonald 2) 3) Van Nest moved, Guthrie seconded recommending approval of rezoning of the 20* strip along north end of the property from B-3 to LR-IB. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). After reviewing Mr. Sweetser*s revised subdivision pro> posal which included individual parcels for the existing two dwelling units, Guthrie moved, Hannah seconded rerom- ^^jnandation fbr approval of the preliminary plans of the V,_jubdivision proposal. Motion, Ayes (S) - Nays (0). Mr. Roessel presented his proposal for a Conditional Use Permit to keep horses in a residential zone and Variances from the code requirements of principal structure fbr KELLY AVENUE HOAING 00. 2SOO KELLY AVENUE SUBDIVISION AND BEZONING sJ^^O^O^LAKE ROAD PBELIMINARy SUBDIVISICN ROBERT ROESSEL 65 CYCNET FLA(X mONAL USB I VARIANCE •• jii :t 6 ii>airr<-niiuwT» r PLANNNING CX>flISSlON MBETING HEID MAY 17, 1976 - Page 3 ”^an cssoiy structures and lot line setbacks for stables, an Nest moved, Guthrie seconded to recoRinend approval of the Conditional Use Pendt to keep horses on the property as the proposal does not conflict with concepts set forth in our Land Use Plan and to approve the variance for the accessory building (bam) withwrt: a main structure as this parcel is directly across from Roessel*s existing residence with fiiture plans of building a new residence on this same lot. Also to approve the variance from the lot line setback requirenent as the proposed location w^d meet all miniman setbacks from adjoining proper­ ties and Watertown Road would provide adequate setback from the property across the street. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Mr. Lani^in presented his new plans for the Burger King proposal, these included an approach from Coixity Road #19 located north of the power pole throush an agreement with the church. The following changes were noted on the new plans: 1) Ingress and egress from County Road #19. Ingress only from Ccwty Road #15. Moving the northeast property line toward the south­ west to the top of the high ground to permit rezon- ing of the lower elevations from B-1 to LR-IC. No filling of low areas. 60 paricing spaces. 'lEnter Chly" sign on County Road #15. Utilizing of vacated Navarre Lane as part of ap- proadi and church parking. 2) 3) Ot] 6) 7) Brad Van Nest informed the CoiRdssion that he had attended a recent Minnetonka Beadi Council Meeting with regard to their view on this request. They showed soaie concern about traffic generation, lighting and litter along Lafayette ^y and possible grease pr^lems. Mr. Lanhin explained he had removed the drive-in, take-out con^t of the estd>lishment to minimize the litter possi­ bility and that grease was not a major problem with Burger King as most of the service is done on throw-away dishes. Pesek moved, Guthrie seconded to recoainend conceptual ap­ proval subject to adequate landscaping from residential areas in Minnetonka Beadi and Orono, resolving grease ques­ tions through referral to City Engineer, ingress and egress approach from County Road #19 to be located north of the power pole, ingress only from County Road #15, and moving the zoning line and property line to the southwest. Motion, Ayes (3) • Nays (2) Van Nest and McDonald. V^^ter approval of the concept Mr. Gene Block voiced some objection because of the possibility of consimer traffic throu^ the residential streets. ROBERT ROeSSEL Cont. BUR(ZR KING 3340 SHORELINE DRIVE mONAL USE I FLAWING (XHOSSION MEETING HELD MAY 17, 1976 • Page 4 Nest moved, Guthrie seconded to recaamend iqpproval of he setback variance for the bam location because of the hard^p of the narroir lot and to reconmend approval of the variance from the ninber of animal isiits pexnitted as the proposal is consistent with the intent of our Land Use Plan, subject to obtaining written approval from the imnediate neighbors. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Mr. Vickeiman presented his proposal to grade a narrow strip from the high enhahknent for access to the Idee and a Conditional Use Pendt and Variance for removal of 11 trees within the 7S' dioreline setback. Van Nest moved, McDonald seconded to reconnend approval of the variance for access to the lake, providing it does not eoctend any further than what is absolutely necessary for a reasond)le grade to construct a stairway of ties (not rail­ road iiqnreffia^ed type) filled with gravel. Mr. Vickeiman was also instructed to replace the 11 trees removed with 11 new trees with diameter of IV to 2h" and add the evergreens as shown on the plan. Motion, Ayes (S) - Nays (0). The Planning Comaission scheduled a Pihlic Hearing for 7:30 P.M. Juie 21, 1976. ^^^cDonald moved, Guthrie seconded to recoRnend approval of the final plat on condition an access easeannt is granted across Lot 1 to Lot 2 and subject to payment of the Paik Dedication Fee. Notion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Hannah moved, Pesek seconded to recoanend approval of the fianl plat sthject to payment of the Paik Dedication Fee and conplianoe with all coiaity reccBnendations listed in the letter of April 29, 1976, idiich indues dedication of an additional 10 feet.of ri^t-of-way along Couity Road #6. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). The SidMells aroeaxed to discuss their subdivision proposal Pimlic Hearing idiich is scheduled for Jime 8, 1976. No action was taken. Mr. Hagen requested reconsideration of his grading proposal idiich was denied at the last Planning Gomnission Meeting at which time approval of the washouts and a ridge about 45 abandoned tennis court. Van Nest moved, Pesek seconded to recomndnd approval of the of the ridge resulting from the abandmd tennis irt, removal of the hazardous punp house, and rip rap along the entire shoreline to prevent fiirmr erosion. Properly placed rip rap should facilitate access to the lake, ^lotion. Ayes (5) - N^ (0). ^Hgrading ZJtKLTt, 1 Guthrie moved, Hannah seconded that the meeting be adjourned at 12:15 A.M. JOSEPH JACOBS 420 lUPMHAM RCAD OONDITIQNAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE TCM VICKERMW 679 MIKA HIGHLANDS LANE *^m0NAL USE PEFMIT m VARIANCS ! i • ^ DOEYE-VEDA-ANEERSGN 500 NOBTH ARM DRIVE LOT REARRANGQCNT 01ARI£S GOK 3580 IVY PLACE FINAL SUBDIVISIGN J 4,f HILDUR HOLLANDER 345 SPRING HILL R FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL i JPMBS E. SintELL 1375 PARK DRIVE SUBDIVISION DON HA(XN 2130 SHADY GRADING ROAD ADJOURMIENr • 12:15 A.M.