The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12-10-2001 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, DECEMBER 10,2001,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA (•) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one moti«>n by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda Memos regarding each of the Agenda items arc available in the Public Packet - located on the counter near the sign in sheet. tfrcTlNO DEC 1 0 2001 Cl I r or ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA I. Approvc/Amend RECOGNITION * 2. Dale Lindquist • Planning Commission • Resolution PLANNING COMMISSION INTERMEWS APPROVAL OF MINUTES • 3. Regular Council Meeting of November 26,2001 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Debora Halvorson. Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Sandy Smith, Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (I ir*it 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 4. #01-2722 Michael and Monica Brown. 1241 Brown Road South - Variances • Resolution MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERMCE DIRECTOR’S REPORT 5. Establishment of Stormwater Utility - Ordinance 6. Establishment of Stormwater Tinnk Fee - Ordinance 7. Xccl Energy Street Lighting Agreement 8. Approve Quotations for Lift Station Control Panels CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 9. Adoption of 2002 Ta,x Levy and Budget A. Adopt Final 2001 Le\7 Collectible in 2002 - Resolution B. Adopt 2002 General Fund Budget - Resolution C. Adopt the 2002 Special Revenue Funds Budgets - Resolution 10. 2002 Fee Schedule AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, DECEMBER 10.2001,7:00 P.M. ORONO COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 2780 KELLEY PARKWAY, ORONO, MINNESOTA 13. 14. 15. 11. AwdiJ of Did for Join! long I.akCi'Orono Fire Station Soil Correction 12. Resolution in Support of Joint Long I.akc Fire Station Construction Committee’s Work and Recommendation Pa>-mcnt Requests - Long Lake Fire Station Project Appraisal of City-0\STicd Parcel Establish Minimum/Ma.ximum Park Dedication Fee for Residential and Commercial Land - Resolutions Appoint Auditor for Fiscal Year 2001 2001 Interfund Transfers and Loan Pa>’mcnts Authorization to Disburse City Funds for Claims Received Letter of Intent to Purchase - One (1) 2002 Ford Crown Victoria Squad Car Letter of Intent to Purchase • One (I) 2002 Ford Expedition 21 . Payment to LMCD for Additional Water Patrol Deputies 22. Council Liaison to Park Commission and Planning Commission Meetings in 2002 23. Schedule Work Scs.sion 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES Kennel 2002 Liquor License Renewals Gambling - Resolution • 25. BILLS ADJOURNMENT UPCOMING ISSUES AND E\XNTS 2m 12/10 - Council Meeting, 7:00 p.m. 1 2/24 -1 lOLIDA Y. Observ ance of Christmas 1 2/25 - HOLIDAY. Observance of Christmas 2m 01/01 - HOLIDAY, Observance of New Year’s Day 01/07 - Park Commission Meeting. 7:15 p.m. 01/14 - Council Meeting. 7:00 p.m. 01/21 - HOLIDAY. Observance of Martin Luther King Jr. Day 01/22 • Ploiming Commission Meeting. Tuesday. 6:30 p.m. 01/28 • Council Meeting. 7:00 p.m. Public Attendance Meeting D ate / C- » / Council □ Planning Commission □ Park Commission □ Other Please nix out the information requested BELOW FDR OUR CITY RECORDS. PRESENT FOR (rrom agenda) NA»fE (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1.. 2.. 7.. 8.. II.. 13.. 14._ t«*p«r4rma • aM.ltNUUJ\HJCJirr i Miami tirETlNQ DEC 1 0 200t CilY ur UHurwO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 6* 2001 ITEM NO: ^ Department Approval: Name RooMoorse Title City Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator’s Rq)ort Item Description: Recognition of Dale Li/(^quist-Resolution Dale Lindquist has served the community with distinction during his eight years on the Planning Commission. Dole has resigned from the Planning Commission due to moving out of the City. He has been invited to attend the December 10 Council meeting to enable the Council to recognize him for his dedicated service to the City. A resolution of appreciation is attached for Council adoption. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached resolution of appreciation for Dale Lindquist ’s distinguished service as a member of the Planning Commission. A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO DALE LINDQUIST FOR DISTINGUISHED SERVICE AS PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER RESOLUTION NO. 4732 WHEREAS, Dale Lindquist has served this conununity with distinction during his ei^t years as a member of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, his years of service have been marked by exemplary dedication to the best interests of the community; and WHEREAS, he has earned the admiration and high regard of those uith whom he has worked; and WHEREAS, the performance of his duties and responsibilities as a member of the Planning Commission has been characterized by excellent and constructive contributions to the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono docs hereby express its sincere appreciation and thanks to Dale Lindquist for his distinguished service to the community and does also highly commend him for the manner in which he has carried out his duties and responsibilities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council extends to him best wishes for continued success in his future endeavors. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of December. 2001. ATTEST: Rachel Dodge, Deputy Clerk Barbara Peterson. Mayor for COUNCIL ACTION DEC 1 0 2001 CiiYuronuf^ DATE: December 6,2001 ITEM NO; Departmeat Approval:Admhiistnitor Reviewed:Agenda Section: Naoi« RonMoorse City Administrator's Tttk City Administnior Report ! Item DmcripCioR: Planning Commission Candidate Interviews The Council has received applications from three candidates to fill one position on the Planning Commission. The candidates are David Rahn, Cynthia Bremer, and Gary Welsh. Mr. Rahn and Ms. Bremer ore both able to attend the December 10 Council meeting to participate in the Council’s interview process. The candidate applications, as well os a set of questions us<k1 in past interviews, are attached. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEW Criteria Eicclknl Good Fair Poor Interest in serving on the Planning Conimission Knowledge, skills, abilities, and experience Familiarity with the following items: a. The City's updated Community Management Plan b. The City's rural development philosophy c. Protection of Lake Minnetonka d. Highway 12 Support of current Programs/Policies and Philosophy ofCit>' Perspective on Council/PIanning Commission responsibilities and relationship Perspective on ways to develop or maintain good Planning Commission/applicant/staff relations Perspective on key issues facing the Planning Commission 1 Jat-ll-UOl ll:OrN FforCin OF OMM «HIt4Mlli T-ltl P OM/MI F-IK APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION CITYafORONO Miuklpal Ofllcti Sbi«t Udrtst: 27S0 KiUty PaiVny OroM. MN SSIM MiIIIbi AMitss: P.O. Bo> i€ Dyttal Bay. MH SS323-006S Commission Applying For: □ Parks Commission 'jStpiannlng Commission □ Community Task Force (Name)_________________________ Name.I l/^y. RAfxtJ Addrtn /3gS" ^oncJ PostOfficeBtZip Code 3^ ^ T.I.phon. _ IW) 9^Z-^^^-2-Z.-7Z Ruidant of Oiono Z. ^______yaara. Work Experience:Work Experience: J / ^ 1 y yr Amj£, ^ ^J04.4' 7!^Ay y r< rrp^/J f//y /y //I, AJ Hft -hohi kyj. Hu f>ei> /^C /uy/y c>rJ o(^ <s/c. Education: 4-> I . I Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): , / yyfiA A-fi c5/6<cAThAf ‘ <T. ^xfcs>: />! y y Pn^y.4', c-A^.______ -______________________________- T^evkeet tfU) 47}-7Sn • FAX 47M510 J»a-ll-200l I2:07n Fror<ITY OF ORONO ♦9S22494B1I T-3SI P 003/003. F>3I6 PItate state your raasons for wanting to serve on this Commission. {Phase be as apacfffc as possible. Use addltlonel sheet if necessary.} A/ AhJ /^orr/>f^\r Pln/JMihi^ vf/Uj^y /yCr>s^o l^i!\ A Uo /y\A Ahi 'ho hpck /yii/j unrJ /■iUj What is your view of the role of the Commission? “7^ m//*. <g>i^ i’a. d:^oi^C r<-hAro\tcx^ y>^-A- /r)M^ AJ^/^y-h^ /!rJ<yA? /yK^yt<L, /0}lu^*or* Tr^A^tr ^< y-o Fe^r:Ju*^ A7 \ ^ Other f‘ ments: {Use this space to include any further information you would like the Cl' council to consider, or that you feet Is relevant to the appointment you are seeking. You may also attach other materials you would$ke the Council to consider.) *7^ AA'Jif' A?M*^ L>^f<fAr< e>A/yJ/fr h.ltJi.? AriT^ntj /aitA^ AjiKir A jStoj^n ^A./'/^ry^ » /yh']^r2^/^jT%eA'^ A /yy^ /TIawh 4<^^ir>r^»^tJL-hr^ 7^ l‘sja</c A ^7^ rhur /.r^CA I 'f'. (.)ryyjlr/ AN -k> haH'\ 4ds.d^ I understano this appointment may be discussed at a pubtic meetiitg. /- /9:-^ / S'«wturt Datt 'NOTE: Volunteer commission member's name, address and phone number will become public information. aMiaij Now 26 01 07s07p 852 473 8776 p.z CYisriHiA A. Bremer 2879 Finiew Ljae Orooo.MN 35356 (952) 473-9777 (hocne) - (612) 333-9536 (office) November 26.2001 GtjrofOtono Muok^ Offices P.O.Ros66 Crystal Bey. MN 55323-0066 Re: Appbestion for PlenniQg Conwntiiion Deer Sir or Madun: Enclosed please 6nd my sppicadoo foe e dozen edvkoty posioon on the Phoning Coenmisnoo. Plemfod free to contact me if you have any questions or if you need eoy additional infonnatioo or documentation Crons me in renewing my iqqiKcation. Thank you for your coniidentkm. Kind regards. Sincetdy, nov 26 01 07t08p Brcn«r l!ar>IMfOI I0:«Im Fro»<in OF OlOIIO 952 473 9776 p.3 ♦U224MIII T>210 P.002/N2 F-I4I APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION GITYorORONO Muolclpal OUkt* Stnoi itfdrtsk 1750 KlJte} flilwnj OroM. m S53S6 .MtlOfll Miff Ik f.O. lot H • Coital Bar. MM SSSISOOM Commission Applying For; □ Parfc» Commission ^ Planning Commission □ Community Task Force iNamel ---------------------- A. 3r^tvur ______________Name_ Address PostOHioa liZip Code ■2^7 “! •purview Len T«tophon« »H) ‘?5Z-M-7 Rtildant of Oiono I Work Experlenoe: ‘5535i,_ years. /irtiSri/Uyy Xf' P(ynn ^ lLP ------- rlyiAnrt7rv<rvi lA/TVtAsfe^'^__ UU .|iaiLrg>. wOJi m athmiy m M E>.. -fey — “ i- f 1. ■ ri?° \A|/7<&l/i iii,^hiy <Xiaii/ry<&tfy I ^ fvd.Af / 1Z..A tXIwi ‘^/hoof _________ Civic and Volunte^ActlvItleo ^at and present): * H^iipiW^/znr )rh^m^XM^iy_______________________ ' Oirici^ Colley t2s^ U^uicr TMapkeat (£13) 473-7317 • FAX 47>4»10 0^^ fV Now 26 01 07t08p Brooor 952 473 8776 « TMapkM* KU) PJ9M9 6tirt9 yo«r roatont for waning to oorvo on thio Commlaolon. (AdoMf Ao •» MP9CfffO ppmbhf. Um9 mddittonat *tw9t tt nmems9»^J j ^ /u/V\ IiV\ /LC^\rcL\J n^^/olvt^________ . )rv\Xj C/nn^ t^vLan ffy Ot/rd^ ]ccl\€^ pigtniw^ 'Z )neJC\£Art^ ’ “ ■* ----------------tvzuViui^ ]WliULi:e^ ClAArk v\rCiC(rkvU_ ^!Tp^yVfl \A/, firi/L ( •fP 4f) nu^f\^ I'us /^>wy \A/^y p64<Vife?k 'jT^r^tUKih! What Is your vlow of ths role of the CommleslohDie of the Commleslon? ' , ^ j mrjnr:htvih\ri^aj^v^ pM) /iw]( g^:cYvgvv^^|UAM>^ tKc^l/c^ 6aa}‘Sommonp:/i«A>ti^outwoutd llk» the City CouncU to eonalder, or thmt you fmmUo rmfovont to tho mppotntmont V®*^*'* mooMng. You moy atao attach othar tnatariafs you wouldUko tho Council to eonalder.) ^ i/wy [ggi^g5gvixl — tifWjry^cA.aJL pviOpcif//-fT viuj/Y\iiv3{i^ rj6vi^t.i/y\^u%ii'^^^' ^ diJi^YV \/oUA^^c£jrcJi n/\ iAAij/vAmuc, /?^^4t4n>iy ‘A44^ I understand this appointment may be discussed at a pubUo maetlng. /^yC^^utkj'x _________ ___U-I^i^ol -----—- N0V-2ft-'ei nON 09:47 An U»lsh 992 4T2960S 0.01 APPLICATION FOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION CnTofORONO Mttalc^ OOlM StrtftMdrNS: 2750 Mtoy Partmi Otom. MN 5S3S6 ttaSRf IMrvf*i f .0. B« H Cfyitat Itr. Wfl 55323^56 Commlsilon Applying For: □ Parks Commission Planning Commission □ Community Task Forca (Nama), OJ LJ e, Js^ ^A/iUki/nt T>ai/ PotlOflloa&ZipCod* 0 UA/J, A/ ^ Talaphona |H) ^ vO. - iW|, ■— Rasldent of Orono ^yeara. Work Exparlence: y c 0 //0A^’4't A / O oaa 5T cA" iQ a/ X? £r /-Ja (3 ______ Eduoatlon: ^ t jji / //OAy /CIS Sn/^^ a/-h r / C^o//e^/o Oi/S/Ay'fiS^X Civic and Volunteer Activities (past and present): /^ / f O^AhA^y ^7CX- n ls. C/J-c.//* ]^) 0 “Ta^/is n/^AAb czot/^/c^r/ /I/ll Pahk aoQt/t^f'f/QyJ MIl^^TUTUn • VAX 47^10 i '«.• NOV-26>ei MON 09t48 952 4725668 P.92 Pleu9 ttste your roaiont for wanting lo aarva on thia Commlaalon. (ARaata b9 at $p9dffe 9$ po9$ibt9. Usafddithtt^MheetffnecmtryJ. ^ i j / t--^JJ-H(> "0!^ t^U tA//o a f<) A/<f q-^ /nfM^ ty(^^ /doJv. ,AAp/fiMijA -hio f/^Jl.y -hhe Coi^A^c^,/.----- Other Commenta: {Usb this apaea to fnefudo any further tnformethn you would like the City Council to consider, or thet you feel Is relevant to the appointment V®" •'« seeking. You may also attach other materials you would like the Council to consider.) I understand this appointment may be discussed at a public meeting. Co^UM Signature Data ••NOTE:Volunteer commission member's name, address end phone number wUI become public Information. a«4aia4 CniikiMii iifrrnMO npr 1 om MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mo«day, November 26,2001 7:00 o'clock p.nh________ 3 Cl I r Ur ROLL The City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present; Mayor Barbara Peterson. Council Members Richard Flint. Bob Sansesere, Jay Nygard and Jim White. Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Moorse. Planning Director Michael Gaffron. Zoning Administrator Paul Weinbe^r, Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg. Public Serv ices Director Greg Gappa. City Engineer Tom Kellogg, and Recorder Jackie Young. City Attorney Tom Barrett arrived at 7:11 p.m. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.r i CONSENT AGENDA <W1) Ap|>rovc/Ame«d Items 4.6. 13. and 14 were added to the Consent Agenda. While moved, Fliol seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *(M) REGUUtR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13.2001 White moved. Flint seconded, to approve the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of November 13,2001, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5. Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Andrew McDc. mott. Representative Due to the absence of Mr. McDermott, this item was not discussed. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Lia Hawn, Representative Hawn stated she would be available for questions at tonight's meeting LMCD REPORT - Uli McMillan McMillan gave a brief update on the proposed LMCD ordinance concerning restrictions on motori/cJ watercraft contributaries to Lake Minnetonka, such as Long Lake Creek. McMillan indicated two citizens did appear at the lost LMCD meeting and discussed the proposed ordinance, with the consensus being that they would like to sec some restrictions but that boat access should not be denied PAGE 1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETINC Moaday, Noveaiber 24,2001 7:00 o’clock p.oi. (LMCD Report, Contiaoed) since it uould be a violation of their rights. McMillan stated she personally would like to sec s<imc restrictions on motorized walcrcran but that the ordinance as proposed may be too prohibitive. McMillan indicated this item would be discussed again at the next LMCD meeting. White suggested the LMCD consider restriction.s on the size of the motor, which may be easier to enforce. McMillan stated the Mayor of Shorewood addressed the LMCD at their last meeting and reported that the City of Minneapolis had passed a phosphorus point of sale restriction ordinarKc. which requires stores that sell fertilizer to display non-phosphorus fertilizer towards the front and iertilizer containing phosphorus towards the back. Tlie ordinance further requires customers to obtain a soil test to demonstrate that their lawn is in need of phosphorus before they may puahase fertilizer containing phosphorus. McMillan noted this is the first ordinance of its type in the country and should help other states in getting a state-w ide ban on fertilizer containing phosphorus. Nygard encouraged StafTto work with the local retailers to insure compliance with the ordinance. McMillan indicated the Water Patrol has stated the two additional deputies have made a tremendous differenee in enforcement of safety on the lake, w hich has resulted in a very successful safe season for boaters this year. Sanscvcrc thanked McMillan for her fine representation of the City of Orono on llie LMCD. McMillan noted the next meeting of tlie LMCD is scheduled for December IZ*. PUBLIC COMMENTS Bill Franklin, Baldur Park Road, gave a brief update to the Council on the progress being made with development of his property. Franklin stated he has delineated the boundaries of the w etlands, w ith the information being supplied to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for verification. Franklin stated he has reviewed the location of the sewer w ith City Staff and has arrived at a rough location for the sewer line. Franklin stated he would have the easement documents prepared in the near future. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT («J) WI-2736 LONG LAKE FIRE STATION - 340 WILLOW DRIVE NORTH - LAND ALTERATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 4726 Mayx>r Peterson opened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. NVeinberger stated a conditional use permit is required in order for site preparation to commence on the new Long Lake Fire Station. Weinberger stated a conditional use permit is required whenever PAGE 2 ■’1 i MINirreSOFTHE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEIX .<C Moaday, Noveaibcr 26,2061 7:00 o’clock p.m._________ (MH>2736 Loag loikc Fire Station, Coatinued) land alteration in excess of SOO cubic yards is proposed on a site. The total land alteration proposed for this site is 22.461 cubic yards to create a building pad for the Long Lake Fire Station. The primary reason for the conditional use permit is to allow soil correction to occur on the site. Weinberger stated this public bearin'} is for the conditional use permit only. This item was not reviewed by the Orono Planning Commission. Weinberger noted there is a provision in the Zoning Ordinance that permits the Council to waive a conditional use permit application from appearing before the Planning Commission if the motion is passed unanimously. There were no public comments concerning this application. .Mayor Peterson ck»ed the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. White moved, Sanseverr seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4726, a Resolntlon granting a conditional use permit for land altcratioa in excess of SOO cubic yards to permit site preparation for the new Long Lake Fire Station located at 540 Willow Drive North, subject to the five conditions outlined in the November 21,2001 Planner’s Report. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. M2640/4I OKONO AMDAR, 2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - REQUEST FOR OFFICE SITE PARK FEE DEFERRAL White moved, Flint seconded, to approve deferral of commercial park fee fur Lot 1 of the plat of Orono Ambar per staff recommendation, and authoriee Staff to execute an agreement w ith the developer per the terms slated in the November 15,2001 Planner’s Memorandum. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. r#5) WOI-2711 WESTERN STEEL ERECTION, 2687 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - CONDITIONAL USE PER.MIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4727 Stephanie and Chuck JiKhims, Applicants, were present. Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting final approval of a conditional use permit to allow permanent “outside storage ” to provide outdoor prking for their equipment at the southeast comer of the property 1 he revised site plans show s the installation of an above ground fuel tank and canopy. The Applicants are proposing to erect a black canopy with red support posts. The fuel station was approved based on the fuel tank being located a minimum of 50 feet to the building and 50 feet to a lot line. Weinberger staled the fence located across the front of the property would be a solid, six-foot wood fence. The Applicants had proposed to place a chain link fence w iih slatted screening around the perimeter of ilie property. Due to the relocation of some parking areas. Weinberger indicated the slatted screening may not be necessary. In addition, the Applicants have indicated some concerns regarding long-term rruiintenance of the fence. The City has requested the Applicant erect a black PAGE 3 1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 26,2001 7:00 o’clock p.m. (M01>27l I Western Steel, Coutinued) chain link fence surrounding the property. Staff would request that the Applicants continue to plant evergreens in accordance with zoning requirements as well as add some landscaping on the west side of the propert>’ to create a natural landscaping buffer between Highway 12 and the parking area. Weinberger slated another issue that Staff has reviewed with the Applicants not remove all trees located in the parking lot area. Weinberger slated some parking spaces would be eliminated in order to provide small islands around some trees located w ithin the parking area. Tlte Applicants have indicated they arc agreeable to this. Weinberger stated the Applicant would still meet the minimum parking requirements. Weinberger stated the four support posts for the canopy have been installed, w ith the prop<iscd canopy- being 24 feet by 36 feet. Staff is recommending that the color of the canopy match the color of the building, which is an off-white, grayish colored building. The Applicants arc proposing a black canopy with the red support posts. Weinberger stated some final approvals are still needed regarding the stormwater management plan. Weinberger stated the Applicants arc scheduled to move fully onto the property in the near future and arc requesting final approval of their site plan. Staff is recommending Council adopt the resolution subject to the conditions outlined. White stated in his view the Applicants and Staff have arrived at a good solution concerning the trees and parking area. Flint stated he has a concern not necessarily specific to this application, but as it relates to the appearance along Highway 12 in general. Flint stated the City tends to look at each of tliesc places piecemeal rather than at the whole picture. Flint stated he would like the City to follow through with the long-term concept originally raised by former Council Member Kelley concerning the aesthetics along Highway 12. Gaffron stated the City has recently received some information from Long Lake concerning the adoption of new ordinances and implementing their development plan along Highway 12. Gaffron stated the City of Orono did look at this issue a couple of years ago and that pertiaps it needs to be revisited. Gaffron inquired whether Flint was interested in the boulevard with trees concept for this area. Flint stated he was. along with decorative lighting. Gaffron stated the City has not taken the next step which would be adoption of regulations requiring the existing property owners along Highway 12 to incorporate certain landscaping features. Flint noted the other side of the roadway is not developed at the present time, but that the City needs to address both sides of the street. Moorse stated the City has not arrived at a final design concept for Highway 12 at the present time. PAGE 4 imiL MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Moaday, Novcabcr 26,2001 7KI0 o*ciock p.ai._________ (Mll-2711 Wctlcra Sled ErccHon, Coatiaacd) with Highway 12 eventually being turned back over to the county. Moorse indicated Kelly Parkway in his opinion is going to be a more important roadway in terms of landscaping. Miwrvc staled the City is still not aware of tite exact plans for Highway 12. Moorsc indicated the City attempted to focus more on screening with this application. Weinberger stated there currently is gra^s 75 feet into the property ufTof Highway 12. which gives the City some flexibility to do something in this area. Flint encouraged the City Staff to develop and adopt a design concept fur Highway 12. White stated in his opinion the Applicants have made a good improvement to the property by the planting of the trees, and suggested the Applicant check with a nursery' regarding salt-tolerant evergreens. Weinberger stated the Applicant is planting the trees further back from the roadway to prevent expi .ure to salt and possible flooding. May or Peterson inquired what the Council thought about the black canopy and red support posts. Mrs. Jochims stated the support posts were painted red for v isibility, w ith Ute majority of their equipment also being red. Sansevere commented he would like to see the canopy blend in more with the landscaping. Mrs. Jochims stated they would be unable to repaint the support pints until the weather becomes nicer. Mayor Peterson stated she also would like to see the colors toned down and blend in more with the building. It was the consensus of the City Council that the colors of the canopy and red support posts should be toned down and made to blend in with the existing gray-colored building. White moved, Sansevere sccoaded, to approve aad adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4727, a Resolation Graatiag a Conditional Use Permit to permit outside storage on the soatheast comer of the property and for a eommercial/iadnst^l site plan review, subject to the conditions outlined in the resolution. VOTE: Ay es 5, Naya 0. *(it6) MOl-2718 AMENDMENT TO ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION IS RELATING TO FENCE STANDARDS - ORDINANCE NO. 211,2"^ SERIES White moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 211, Second Series, an Ordinance of the City of Orono, Minnesota, Amending City Code Chapter 10.03, Subdivision 15 by Adding, Deleting, or Amending Certain Standards Relating to Fences. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAGES MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Moaday, Ntncnber 26,2001 7;00 o ’clock p.m. •(07) #01-2729 W. GREGORY AND KATHERINE COWARD, 1950 HERITAGE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4728 WMte Mo>cd, niBl sccoiM, to approve aad adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4728, a Resolatioa Graatiaf a Coaditioaal Um Pemit to penait coastnictioB of two acccsury boildiags oa a Ihroagh lot for the property located at 1950 HeriUge Drive. VOTE: Ayes 5, Na>s 0. (#8) #01-2732 REVIS STEPHENSON III, 1850 FOX RIDGE ROAD-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 4729 Rev is Stephensoo. Applicant, was present. Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to pennit land alteration over 500 cubic yards for the purpose to fill a steep slope area and have an improved finished grade for the backyard. 11ie property is located at 1850 Fox Ridge Road, with the lot having only 20 to 30 feet of yard area before the lot Ims a steep drop. The projec. would require clear cutting the :.'opc and depositing 3.280 cubic yards of fill. Tlie source of the fill is from the Orono Woods apartment building liKaled at the northwest comer of Highway 12 ond Brown Road rhe Planning Commission reviewed this item at tlieir November meeting and recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the November 20. 2001 Planner ’s Report. Weinberger noted a financial guarantee is being requested on this project because Fox Ridge Road is a public road and there is some concern w ith the number of trucks and amount of fill that will be transported to this site. Weinberger staled the purpose of the financial guarantee is to insure the current condition of the road would be maintained. Weinberger stated Slafl' is also working with the Applicant regarding restoration of the vegetation in this area. 11te Applicant is proposing to plant some maple and other hardwiHHl trees in place of the box elders and brush that currently exist. Stepheimm stated he has nothing to add to StafTs repiirt. While moved to approve aad adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4729, a Resolutioa Graaling a Conditional Use Permit to permit land alteration and fdl of 3 J80 square feet of material to the rear of the property located at 1850 Fos Ridge Road, subject to the conditions outlined in the November 20.2001 Planner's Report. Stephenson stated he would like to discuss the financial guarantee. Weinberger stated Staff would be meeting with the Applicant to discuss the current condition of the roadway os well as the financial guarantee. Stephenson stated he does not want to have to finance construction of a brand-new roadway since the current condition of the roadway is poor. PAGE 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 26,2001 _________7;00 o’clock p.m. (001-2732 Revis Stephenson, Continned) Mayor Peterson stated the Public Works Director and City Engineer would be meeting with him to discuss the current condition of the road. Gappa stated if the hauling of the fill is done afler the ground freezes, they should not have a problem. Sansevere suggested the Applicant consult with an attorney as well regarding the financial guarantee. Moorse stated Staff sitould be able »o narrow down a number for the financial guarantee. Sansevere seconded the above motion. VOTE: Ayes 5, Na>*s 0. *(09) 001-2733 WILLIAM B. AND LYNAE PETERSON, 420 ORCHARD PARK ROAD - VARIANCE RENEWAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4730 White moved, Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4730, a Resolution Granting a Renewal Variance to permit the renewal of a variance to lot area and to grant a variance to permit the property located at 420 Orchard Park Road to be developed with a single family residence. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *(»10) ttOl-2734 MARGIE NEWTON, 505 ORCHARD PARK ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4731 White moved. Flint seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4731, a Resolution Granting Variances for the property located at 505 Orchard Park Road. VOTE: Aycs5,Na)a0. (till) «0l-2735 AMENDMENT TO ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03.SUBDIVISION 14, STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE Gaffron stated under the proposed amendment, in-ground pools and their associated grade-level patios would no longer be considered os structures for the purpose of calculating ‘‘lot coverage by structures". ITie original lot coverage ordinance adopt^ in 1989 did not include pools in the calculation of lot coverage. The ordinance was later amended six months afier its adoption to include pools and their associated patios. Tlie Planning Commission did review this amendment and was pretty evenly divided on the issue. The four Planning Commission members in support of this change would like to see it accompanied by a new hardcover limitation on all non-Shoreland residential lots under two acres in area. The three Planning Commission members against the proposed amendment feel that pools and their associated patios^decks should continue to be calculated as lot coverage by structure, and suggested that decks regardless of height should also be considered for inclusion as lot coverage. PAGE 7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 26,2001 7;00 o’clock p.m._________ (M0I-273S Amendment to Zoning Code - Structural Lot Coverage, Continued) GafTron staled the property owners that have requested the change would not be opposed to approving new hardcover limitations on all non-Shorctand residential lots under two acres. GafTron suggested this item be tabled to a joint work session with the Planning Commission to discuss these issues more indepth. Nygard noted there is an outstanding application that is awaiting a decision on this amendment. GafTron staled that application deals with a resident wishing to replace an e.xisting home with a new Structure that would use the entire IS percent lot coverage allotment. Retention of the existing in- ground pool and its associated patio/deck would result in an additional eight pea'eni lot coverage, for a total lot coverage of 23 percent. Council had approved the lot onra variance in October subject to removal of the pool at the time the house is remov ed unless the ordinance is changed. Sansevere indicated he would like to review this issue more fully in a work session w ith the Planning Commission. Mary King. 142 Chevy Chose Drive, slated in her view the current ordinance is too restrictive for people, noting the new home and pool would be located within all the required setbacks. King stated their property would still Imve a fair amount of green space following construction, with the pool and deck adding value to their home. King stated the pool is located behind the house, so visual impact is not an issue in this cose. King commented in her view property owners should have some choice in how their property is developed since they ore paying ta.xcs on the land, and they should not be penalized by hav ing to remove the ptnvl simply because they want a larger residence. King thanked City Staff for the fine job they do in keeping the roadways plowed at this lime of year. While pointed out that the City of Orono is one of the lowest taxed cities in I lennepin County. Flint staled he would like to have a work session scheduled sometime in December or early January . Flint stated that before he read the staff memo, in his view this was more of a runoff issue than a strucfral bliKk issue. Flint staled he now has a new understanding of the issue. Flint noted there have been some conflicting views on this issue in the past. White moved, Sansevere seconded, to table Applkalion MI-2735, Amendment to Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdiv ision 14, Structural Lot Coverage, to a joiat work session with the Planning Commission in cither December or January. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Flint commented in relation to the City’s vacant lot at Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road, he is not in support of a contract that would bind the City of Orono on the sale of a property when the other party is free to walk away from the deal. PAGES MINUTES or THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MoMlay, Noveaber 26.2001 7:00o*clockp.ai. (Mayor/C<NMcil Report, Coattaacd) Moone stated the City currently only has a preliminary appraised value on the property and not a final number. White suggested the City consider entering into a development contract on this property. Moorse stated Staff has discussed a restrictive covenant. PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR’S REPORT Gappa had nothing to report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT (M12) 2002 Meeting Scbcdvie Flint stated he would like Staff to consider the possibility ofhaving the Nfay Council meeting moved to Thursday of the previous week. Flint noted he would be unable to attend the May Council meeting if it is scheduled for Tuesday. Sanscvcrc noted he also may miss one or two Council meetings in February. Flint moved. White seconded, to approve the 2002 Orono Meeting Schedule. VOTE: Ayes 5. Nays 0. I ( ACCEPT POLICE DEPARTMENT GRANT FOR SNOWMOBILLNG TRAIM.NG While moved, Flint seconded, to accept the DNR grant in the amonni of $1,000 for snowmobile enrorcement and public safety education. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT City Attorney Barrett had nothing to report. *(MI4) LICENSES White nMved, Flint seconded, to approve the following licenses. VOTE: Ayes S. Nays i. Kennel License: Dennis and Gail Wilder 1331 North Arm Drive PAGE 9 irnni MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Movday, Novrnbcr 26,2601 7:00 o’clock _________ (UccMcs, CoadMMd) Clob Oa Sale Uqoor: Spring Hill GolfClub 725 Sixth Avenue North Wayzata Country Club 200 Wayzaui Boulevard WoodhillCounlr>Club 200 Woodhill Road Off Sale Liquor 12 Hi Liquor 2160 West Wayzata Boulevard Navarre Liquors. Inc. 3421 Shoreline Drive On Sale Liquor: Narrows Saloon 3380 Shoreline Drive *(kl5) BILLS While moved, Flint seconded, lo approve payment of the All Funds Account. VOTE: Ayw5,Na)i0. OTHER ISSUES Moorsc gave a brief update on the proposal by Mound to construct a new fire station. Mexusc staled there arc several issues that need lo be discussed regarding Orono's financial contribution to the station. Moorse noted the Cit>- of Mo* nd would like a decision by December or Januarv. w ith a referendum on this issue being held in May. The City Council directed Moorsc to either call or write a letter to the City of Mound explaining the long-term fire scrv ice issues that affect Orono's consideration of a new Mound fire station and indicating the need to have additional time to rev iew this issue. PAGE 10 A ^ B ^ Q ’g ' 3200 ^ 2M0 p 2400 Q 2000 JoO j J Joo diJTs^s- te' 400 City of Orono, Minnesota Street Numbering Index Map asERn^i IS-* t«uaoe.iK M»l «MS SO, MS Stef ?. l#SO A«e s. •**• SM. M,M« *>M. ir.MM SMC S. ItSS SM M.ISM AGENDA EOR COIJNaL .\tEETlNG SET FOR MONDAY. DECEMBER 10,2001,7:00 P_M. ORONO COl'NCIL OlANreERS, 2700 KELLEY PARKW AY, ORONO. MINNESOTA (•) Aitcriik itemi •« consiJrml to be routine item* to be enacteii upon by one motion by the City Council under the Content tietn* on the ngeoiU. MecuM lesMiling each of the Agcndi items ate available in the Public Packet • located on the eouBier near the sign ui sheet. ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA I Approve/Amend RECOGNITION • 2. Dato Lindquist «PtiaitiagCoBiamioB» Resolution ••^'"TlMG PLAN-NTNC CONIMISSIOMNTERVIEWS DEC 1 Q 200t approval OF MINITES • J Regular Council Meeting of November 26. 2001^*'* PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Oebora Halvonon. Rcpecscntauvc PLANNING COMMISSION COVLMENTS • Sandy Smith. Representative PI BLIC COMMENTS • (Limit 5 Miaalei Pee Pee,OB) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT d aOI-2722 Michael and Momca Biumii , 1241 Brown Road South • Variances • Rcsolutioa MAYOR/COCNCIL REPORT PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR S REPORT 5 Establishment of Stormwater Uulity • Resolution 6 Establishment of Stormwater Tnink Fee'Resolution 7. Xcel Energy Street Lightmg Agreement I Approve (Quotations for Lift Station Control Panels CITY ADNII.MSTRATOR'S REPORT 9 Adoption of 2002 Tar Levy and Budget A. Adopt Final 2001 Levy Collectible in 2002 • Resolutioa r Adopt 2002 General Fund Budget • Resolution I. Adopt the 2002 Special Revenue Funds Budgets • Resolutioa 10 2002 Fee Schedule 11. Award of Bid for Joint Long LakbOrono Fite Station Soil Coneciion 12. Resolution m Support of Joint Long Lake Fire Statioo Construction Comtnittee'i Work and Recommendation 13 Payt.-ieni Requests • Long Lake Fire Statioo Project U. Appraisal of City-Owned Paitcl IJ Esublish .Minimuitv'Mavimum Park Dedication Fee f.»i Residcnital and Commercial Land • Resolutions 16 Appoint Auditor for f iscal Y'ear 2001 17 2001 Interfund Transfets and Loan Payrnenu II Authoruation to Disburse City Funds f>?r Claims Received 19 Letter of Intent to Purchase • One(l) 2002 Ford Crown VKtoiia$<|uadCar 20 Letter of Intent to Purchase-One (1)2002 Ford Evpedition 21. Payment to LMCD for Addibonal Water Patrol Depuues 22 Council Liaison to Park Commission and Planning Commisuon Mretings m 2002 23. Schedule Work Session CITY ATTORNEY S REPORT 24 LICENSES Kennel 2002 Liquor License Renewals Gambling • Resolution • 25 DILLS ADJOURNMENT UPCOMING ISSUES A.ND E%X.NTS 2m IZ'IO - Council Meeting. 7 00 pm. IZ'24 - HOLIDAY, Observsnee of Christmas 1123 - HOLIDAY'. ObservstKe of Christmas 01 01 - HOLIDAY. Observance of New Year'sDay 0IA)7 - Pari Commiuioo Meeting. 71J pm. 01/14 • Council Meeting. 700 p m 01/21 - HOLIDAY. ObscrvarKC of Martm Luther King Jr Day 01/22 - Planning Comrrustion Mecring. TutsJjy. 6 30 p m. 01/21 • Council Meeting. 7 00 p m 4d00 A 4400 0 4000 Q SSl^’g 3200 g 2M0 p 2400 Q 2000 1M0 | City of Orono, Minnesota Street Numbering Index Map •oxsna^ lODi. • UHc K mr- Lm%Q K*t tc»f r, *»»• 1B.BM AM *. Mttsris: sts:Si AGENDA rOR COlWCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY. DECEMBER I*. 2001,7:00 TM. ORONO COCNCIL CHAMBERS, 2700 KELLEY EARKW AY, ORONO. MINNESOTA (•) Asteriik itemi arc coosidcred to be routine items to be ctucini upon by ooc motioa by the City Council under the Coiueni Item* on the ■cenda. Memos rtfardiof each of ihe Agenda items «e available in the PuUic Packet - located on the counter near the sign ui sheet ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA I Approved Amend RECOGNITION „ • 2. Date Und(|uiti>PtaoniiigCoaMBistian> Resolution ••**'~TI|i^G PLANNING COMMISSION INTERVIEWS DfC | POQI APPROVAL OF MINLTES • 3 Regular Council Meeting of November 26. 2001^” ^Of ♦ PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS • Ueboca Halvorson. Representative PLANNING COM.MISSION COVDIENTS • Sandy Smith. Rcptesenuiive PI HLIC CO.SI.MENTS • (Limit S .Mioolcs Per Ptr,«D) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 4 »Ol-2722 Michael and MooKa Brown. 1241 Brown Road South-Vaiiinces • Resolution MAkORCOL'NCIL REPORT PL BLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 3 EstablishmentofSiomiwaterUtility-Resolution 6 Establishment of Stormwater Trunk Fee-Resolution 7. Xcel Energy Sueet Lighting Agreement I. Approve Qiwutiofii for Lift Station Control Panels CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S RF:P0RT 9 Adoption of 2002 Tav Levy and Budget A Adopt Final 2001 Levy Collectible in 2<»2 • Resolution r Adopt 2002 General Fund Budget • Resolution Adopt the 2002 Special Revenue Furids Budgets • Resolution 10 2002 Fee Schedule 11. Award of Did for Joint Long Lake.'Orono Fire Station Soil Coircction 12 Resolution m Support of Joint Long Lake Fite Sution Construction Comminee's Work and Recommendation I}. Payment Requests - Long Lake Fire Station Project 14 AppraisalofCityOwnedParccI 15 Establish MinimumMavimum Paik DeJicaiion Fee fur Residential and Cummercial Land • Resoluuons 16 Appoint Auditor for Fiscal Year 2001 17, 2001 tnierfund Transfers and Loan Pavtnents II AuthonraUon to Disburse City Funds for Claims Received 19 Lctierof Intent to Purchaar- One (I) 2002 Ford Crown Victoria Sipiad Car 20 Letter of Intent to Purchase-One (1)2002 Ford Espediuon 21. Payment to L.MCD for Addi'uonal Water Patrol Deques 22 Council Liaison to Park Commission and Planning Commission Meetings in 2002 23. Schedule W ork Session CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 24 LICENSES Kennel 2002 Liquor License Renewals Gambling - Resolution • 23 BILLS AOJOLRVMENT UPCOMING ISSUES AND EAXNTS lasi IZ'tO • CouiKil Meeting. 7 00 p m. 12/24 . HOLIDAY. Observance of Christmas I2'23 • HOLIDAY. Observance of Christmas 01/01 • HOLIDAY. Observance of New Year's Day 01/07 • Park Commiuion Mceung, 7 13pm 0I/|4 • Council Meeting. 7 00 p m 01/21- HOLIDAY. Observance of Stanw Luther King Jr Day 01/22 - Planning Commission Meeting, rucniiy 6 30 p m 01/21 - Council .Meeting. 7 00 p m Cnn*i/«ii tiecnNO DEC 1 0 2001 Cl I V wr wncN«U REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 3,2001 ITEM NO.: ^ DcpartMcal Approval: Name Paul Weinberger Title Zoning Administrator Administrator Rcviciwed:Agrada Scctioa: Zoning Item Descriptiun:ltOI-2722 Michael and Monica Broun 1241 Broun Road South Variances Zon>«p niiirict:RR-IB. One Family Rural Residential (2 acre) A B C D Resolution Existing Site Conditions Proposed Site Plan Planning Report {November 16. 2001) Dcscriptioa of Request Applicants have requested variances to permit eonstruetion of a 28* X 24 ’ detached garage to replace an existing garage. The propvised garage is propiised to be located 10’ olT the south (Minnetonka Avenue) property line, uhere a 50' setback is required, and 5’ from the rear property line where a 10’ setback is required. The garage doors would face the street, which also requires a 30’ setback regardless t zoning district. The second part of the application was to replace an e.xisting fence that is 6’ in height within the side yard adjacent to street (Minnetonka Avenue) setback where a maximum heiglit fence is allowed to be 3 Vi. lire existing fence is liKated 2T from the property line, property owners have requested the fence to be replaced and rcliKatcd 15 ’ from the property line The proposed garage would be consistent with the development along Minnetonka Avenue as the other detached garages face directly towards the street. The property owners have also agreed to reduce the size of the outside parking area to accommodate an adequate width for outdoor parking for one vehicle. Planuiag Commissloii Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended on a vote of 7 to 0 to approve the variances to permit construction of a 24' ,\ 28' garage located as noted above, and to permit construction of a 6' fence 15’ to the property line adjacent to a street subject to the condition the existing parking area be reduced in size to accommodate off street parking for only one vehicle Recommendation was based on the following findings and hardships; 1.Accessory buildings under 750 s.f. are permitted to be located 10’ from the rear and north side property line Since the applicant’s property is a corner lot the required setback to each street property line is 50 ’. The garage would be constructed w ith the access doors facing the Minnetonka Avenue property line. The proposed design would be consistent with the cumnt development pattern of other properties located along Minnetonka Avenue. WI-2722 N!ichael and Monica Brown December 12.2001 pane 2 of 3 3. The proposed garr.ge would be 28 ’ X 24* and would have the doors facing Ihe slreel to allow backing out onto Minnetonka Avenue rather than having to back out to the existing parking area. Across Minnetonka Avenue arc two detached garages that arc b'lilt on the lots with direct access to the street. The clo?esl garage, across the street is 12.5' from the paved surface of Minnetonka Avenue. A second garage is IcKatcd 25' from the paved surface of the street. The proposed garage would be located 22 .5* from the paved surface 4. The applicants have stated their hardship is the garage could not be moved further to the north due to a large pine tree being located behind the garage that thev' would like to keep on the propertx'. Staff has measured the tree and confirmed it has a trunk diameter of approximately 16" and has a 30* diameter drip line. The tree is located 12' from the back wall of the existing garage. 5. Nearly all garages built in the Crystal Bay neighborhood on comer lots have the garage with direct access, including the two lots across the street. One problem with the direct access is the fact the garages have very short driveways which do not accommodate olT street parking very well. Adequate off street parking is not always available and Minnetonka Avenue is a narrow road only paved 15' wide. 6 The fence would replace an existing fence located 27' from the property line, and would provide privacy screening for the back yard of the house. 7. The lot is a 1/4 acre property located in a 2 acre /tuiing district requiring 50' setbacks for fences greater than 6' in height liKatcd adjacent to a street property lines. The properly is a comer lot where construction of n 6' privacy fence would require the fence to be constructed over an area of the property where it could not provide screening for Uie back yard area of tlic house. Staff Kecommendaliun Sufi's recommendation difiers slightly from the Planning Commission recommendation. SufTs recommendation is to approve variances to permit a 6‘ fence to be located 2fil fri>ni the property line (Plaiming Commission reviewed a request for a fence 15! from the property line). Staff agrees with the Planning Commission recommendation to approve the garage as proposed. I1ie resolution requires a 20' setback for the 6' fence rather than a 15 ‘ setback for the area of the property to be used for the parking stall. The discussion of the 15' setback was a change to the original request by the property owners to replace the fence in its’ existing location 2T from the property line The 15' setback concept was first discussed with the Planning Commission the evening of the meeting on November 19. 2001. Staff has since reviewed the request to permit the fence only 15' from the property line rather than 27' and has recommended Ihe fence be constructed 20' from the property line for the portion of the property that is used for the single outsiue parking stall. Based on new information the additional 5* was requested for two [SaSSDL I) Personnel assigned to plow snow in the Crystal Bay neighborhood has indicated it would be Ihe best case scenario to have additional space to plow snow and to eliminate the potential for an obstacle if a large vehicle is parked in that location. 2) 20' is the sundard length for a parking stall and would allow the property owners and their guests to park a vehicle completely on their property without encroaching into the public right of way. If the parking space became an obstacle in the right of way the City could reserve the right to prohibit parking over the property line into the right of way. «0I>2722 Mkhael and Monica Brown December 12.2001 Page 3 of 3 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the anached resolution approving variances to permit construction of a ff fence 2V to the property line adjacent to a street, or follow the Planning Commission recommendation and approve the resolution allowing the 6' fence to be constructed IS* from the property line, and to approve variances for the garage location I O' from the side property line and S' from the rear property line. -------------j A RESOLUTION GRANTINT. VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03 SUBDIVISION 9 (D); SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 13; SECTION 10.28 SUBDIVISION 5 (B); AND SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION IS (C) RLE NO. 01-2722 WHEREAS, Michael Bro\v-n and Monica Brown, (hereinafter "ihc applicanls") arc owners of ihc property located at 1241 Brown Road South witliin llie City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Maxwells Addition Cry stal Bay Lake Minnetonka. I Icnncpin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03. Subdivision 9(D), Section 10.03. Subdivision 13. and Section 10.28, Subdivision S (B) to permit construction of a 24* X 28' detached garage 10 ’ from the side yard adjacent to the street (south) property line where a 50* setback is required, and 5 ’ from the rear property line where a 10* setback is required; and to Section 10.03. Subdivision 15 (C) to permit construction of a 6' fence 15' from the side yard adjacent to the street (south) property line, where a 3 '/a fence is permitted; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on October 15.2001 and November 19. 2001. at which time all persons desiring to be heard cc.iceming this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Minnesota: 1. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. FINDINGS This application was reviewed as Zoning File W1-2722. The property is located in the RR-IB, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. Page 1 of 6 3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 15.200 1 and November 19. 2001 and recommended approval of variances by a vote of 7 to 0. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: _ iiiiiiiiiUii Accessory buildings under 750 s.f. are permitted to be located 10' from the rear and north side property line. Since the applicant's property is a comer lot the required setback to each street property tine is SO'. The garage would be constructed with the access doors facing the Minnetonka Avenue property line. The proposed design would be consistent with the current development pattern of other properties located along Minnetonka Avenue. Tlie proposed garage would be 28' X 24' and would have the doors facing the street to allow backing out to Minnetonka Avenue rather than having to back out to the e.xisting parking area. Across Minnetonka Avenue are two detached garages that ore built on the lots with direct access to the street. The closest garage, across the street is 12.5' from the paved surface of Minnetonka Avenue. A second garage is located 25' from the paved surface of the street. 'Hte proposed garage would be located 22.5' from the paved surface. The applicants have stated their hardship is the garage could not be moved further to the north due to a large pine tree being located behind the garage that they would like to keep on the property. Staff has measured the tree and confirmed it has a trunk diameter of appro.ximately 16" and has a 30' diameter drip line. The tree is located 12' from the back wall of the e.xisting garage. Nearly all garages built in the Crystal Day neighborhood on comer lots have the garage with direct access, including the two lots acro.ss the street. One problem with the direct access is the fact the garages have very short driveways which do not accommodate olTstreet parking very v\ell. Adequate off street parking is not always available and Minnetonka Av enue is a nani>w road only paved 15' wide. Page 2 of 6 F. The fence would replace an existing fence located 27* from the property line, and would provide privacy screening for the back yard of the house. O. The lot is a 1/4 acre property located in a 2 acre zoning district requiring 50* setbacks for fences greater than 6’ in height located adjacent to a street property lines. The property is a comer lot where construction of a 6* privacy fence would require the fence to be constructed over an area of the property where it could not provide screening for the back yard area of the house. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air. nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would nut merely ser\ e as a con\ enience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to presets e a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping w ith the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6 The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings. tl.c Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03. Subdivision 9 (D), Section 10.03. Subdivision 13, and Section 10.28. Subdivision 5 (U) to permit construction of a 24* X 28 detached garage 10' from the side yard adjacent to the street (south) property line where 50' is required, and 5* from the rear property line where a 10’ setback is required; and to Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) to pemiit construction of a 6’ fence 15' from the side yard adjacent to the street (south) property line, where a 3 Vi fence is permitted subject to the following conditions: 1. The property shall be developed in conformance w ith the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. The fence shall be constructed a minimum of 20* from the south property line to provide one (1) outdoor, on-site parking space in accordance with the attached site plan. Page 3 of 6 3. Authorities granted by the variances run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (December 10.2002). 4. Violation of or non*compliance with any of the terms and conditions of the variances shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically tcrmiivue any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned o\«icrs have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, and hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the lOih day of December. 2001. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee. City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owners STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument w as acknowledged before me on this 10th day of December. 2001 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said insuiiment was e.xecuted on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this ________ day of ________. 200 ____by Linda S. Vee. City Clerk of the City of Orono. a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument wiis executed on behalf of the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Notary Public On this day of..20 personally appeared before me. ____ who is personally known to me ____ whose identity I proved on the basis of. a credible____ whose identity I proved on the oath/alTirmation____________ witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that hc/sheAhey executed the same as his/her/iheir free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of._,20_ personally appeared before me. ____ who is personally known to me ____ whose identity I proved on the basis of. a credible____ whose identity I proved on the oath/aflirmation____________ witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknow ledged that hc/she/they executed the same as his/her'their free act and deed. Notary Public Pages of 6 r B 111% I 1 0 Application Dale: 9/18/01 Deadline: M6/01 TO: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: November 16.2001 SUBJECT: «01 -2722 Michael and Monica Brown 1241 Brown Road South Variances Zoning District: RR-1B, 2 acre. One Family Rural Residential Backf round: Planning Commission tabled this application in October to allow the propert> owner to consider options to the site plan in relation to garage size and setbacks. Applicants had made an application requiring variances to permit construction of a 28' X 24' detached garage to replace an e.xisting garage. The proposed garage is proposed to be located 6' ofTthe south (Minnetonka Avenue) property line. The south property line is defined as a side yard adjacent to street yard requiring a SO' setback. The garage doors are facing the street, which also requires a 30' setback regardless of zoning district. The garage is also proposed to be located S' from the rear property line where a 10' setback is required. The second part of the application was to replace an existing fence that is 6* in height w ithin the side yard adjacent to street (Minnetonka Avenue) setback where a maximum height fence is allowed to be 3 Vi. The fence is a privacy fence to the back yard. The fence is located 27 from the property line. The Planning Commission did state general support for the fence height variance. Property owners have not submitted a new plan to revise the garage location or access to the property. However they have stated they are agreeable to move the garage back an additional S' from the property line The total setback to the property line would become 11', rather than 6'. The other issue is the S' setback to the alley. Suff can support a S' setback to the alley. The City does not intend to develop the alley as a traveled road. All that the alley is used for is for electric service. The hardship is the location of a mature pine tree that is located behind the garage. The proposed garage would be consistent with the development along Minnetonka Avenue as the otiier detached garages face directly towards the street. The property owners have also agreed to reduce the size of the outside parking area to only accommodate a width of one to one and a half cars. Please read the attached October Staff Report for additional background. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of variances to permit replacement of a 6' fence within SO' of the street property line. Staff also recommends approval of variances to permit an IT side yard adjacent to the street setback and a S' setback to the alley based on the proposed garage meets the development pattern of surrounding properties along Minnetonka Avenue and the alley is not intertded to be used for roadway purposes. The width of the alley and the S' side setback exceed the 10* that would normally be required for a structure setback to an adjacent property. CTTYOFORONO P.O.B ok 66 CrystalBay.MN SS323 PHONE:(952)249-4600 FAX:(9S2)24M6:6 ZONING FILE Ml-2722 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: October 16,2001 TO: Michael and Monica Brown 1241 Brown Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 ■1 TYPE OF APPLICATION:JSC_Variance ___Conditional Use Permit ___Subdivision Other DATE OF MEETING: October 15,2001 VOTE: 6 FOR PlaoniBg Cammissioa recommends the following: 0 AGAINST Approval as submitted Approval subject to conditions noted below Denial for reasons noted below X Tabled for reasons noted below __No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The application was tabled to allow an opportunity to redesign the site plan to reflect a change to the property setbacks. Please contact the Zoning Department to set up an appointment to discuss the application. Our number is (952) 249-4600. If you desire certified copies of the official Plaiming Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. .iJiiiii AppIkalloD Date: 9/18/01 DcadUnc: 11/17/01 TO: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator/Planner DATE: October 8.2001 SUBJECT: «01 -2722 Michael and Monica Browm 1241 Brown Road South Variances Zoning District: LIstofEihibits RR-IB, 2 acre, One Family Rural Residential A Application B Hardship Sutement C Plat Map D Property Owners NotiFication List E Existing Conditions Property Survey F Proposed Site Plan G Garage Elevation Views and Dimensions Revictv of Request: Applicants have requested variances to permit construction of a 28’ X 24' detached garage to replace an existing garage. The proposed garage is proposed to be located 6' oft the south (Minnetonka Avenue) property line. The south property line is defined as a side yard adjacent to street yard requiring a 50' setback. The garage doors are facing the street, which also requires a 30’ setback regaMiess of zoning district The garage is also proposed to be located 5’ from the rear propert>* line where a 10’ setback is required. Secondly, the applicants arc requt ting a variance to permit replacement of an existing fence that is 6 ’ in height within the side yard adjacent to street (Minnetonka Avenue; setback where a maximum height fence is allowed to be 3 '/a'. The fence is a privacy fence to the back yard. The fence is located 27' from the propertv ’ line. Code Review: Garage Variance: 1. Section 10.03. Subdivision 13 - To permit the doors of g j^lgched garage to be located 6* from a lot line where 30' is required 2. Section 10.28. Subdivision 5 and Section 10.61 Subdivision 5 f A1 to permit the side yard adjacent to street setback to be 6 ’ where SO* is required in the RR-lB district. •0l-372t Mkiwcl and MoaicaBiWMi 1241 Brawn HMdSoMk KVISAH Pi«tlorS 3t SwUon lQ.61i-Sub<livision 5 (A) to permit a 2araye to be located 5* from the rear property tiny where 10* is required for construction of a detached yarayg The applicants have stated their 15' X 22’ garage is not large enough and would like to construct a larger garage. The proposed garage would be 28’ X 24’ and would have the door access facing the street to allow backing out onto Minnetonka Avenue rather than having to back out to the e.xisting parking area. Across Minnetonka Avenue are two detached garages that arc built on the lots with direct access to the sueet. The closest garage, across the street is 12S from the paved surface of Minnetonka Avenue. A second garage is located 25* from the paved surface of the street The proposed garage would be located 18.5’ from the paved surface. 30* is the standard. In the applicants hardship statement they have stated the garage could not be moved further to the north due to a large pine tree being located behind the garage that they would like to keep on the property. Staff has measured the tree and confirmed it has a trunk diameter of appro.ximately 16*’ and has a 30’ diameter drip line. The tree is located 12’ from the back wall of the e.xisting garage The new garage would not be located closer to the tree than the existing garage The two ways to obvious maximize the setback to the street and save the tree would be to reduce the size of the garage or move the garage farther to the north and east between the tree and the house. Nearly all garages built in the Crystal Bay neighborhood on comer lots have the garage with direct access, including the two lots across the street. One problem with the direct access is the fact the garages have very short driveways posing a problem with off street parking. Adequate off street parking is not always available and Minnetonka Avenue is a narrow road only paved 15’ wide. City st^dards only allow one curb cut per property with a 20’ width. The property has an existing 40 wide parking area located east of the existing garage that would remain, however the width would be narrowed because the larger garage would encroach into the existing parking surface. Fence Variance ]. Swiion 10.93. SMWIvisiOn I; (O: TTli, r,miHs 3 ■/, foo, as a --------------------- iQJCqUircq yard setbacks. ApolicanK have reaue«tf>H varinnp,.. r18 reggired Yard yHiacks. APDlicanls Hav.. r»„if,|ed variance tn rcpijct Ihe A f,nr. located 27 from the rropem- line ^ -iin v Non Lakeshore Lots Exceptions to the 3 '/i foot setback are peimitted for fences located outside of front yard setbacks and side yard adjacent to street setbacks (A fence up to 6 feet in height could be constructed vsithin the side \ ard setback on the north side of the house and rear yard setback.) The proposed fence would remain in the same location as the existing fence. The fence is to provide •01-2722 MicliacI aid Moatca Biowa !24| Road So** KVIMII Pig<2or5 ■ Aim I iiir<n^ Bordcovcr: The property is located in the Shoreland area. It is located within the 500* • 1.000* setback to the high water level of French Lake. The total proposed hardcover is 3,536 s.f. (21.5%) where 5,759 s.f. (35%) is allowed. Total lot area is 16,455 s.f. New Hardcover 672 s.f. for the new detached garage 144 s.f. for the new driveway access STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP Applicant's hardship is included with Exhibits A and B. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship 1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The property is being put to a reasonable use because it contains a single family residence. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The garage would be constructed with the doors facing towards Minnetonka Avenue which is consistent with other garages in the neighborhood. IVhat circumstances prohibit placement ofthe garage between the tree and the house to allowfor a greater street setback? 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance would not change the character ofthe locality. The development pattern ofthe lot is in character with the general development pattern of the Crystal Bay neighborhood 4. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of this chapter. Economic factors are not a consideration. 5. Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Solar access is not a consideration. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance fqr any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for the property in the zone where •Ol-tm Mkhail mi Monica Brown 1341 Brow* Rood So«di IQtIVOI rifcJors 8. 11. the aflecteu person's land is located. The tue of the property would remain residential which U a permiued use in the zoning district. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. The applicant will not be changing the dwelling status of the property. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The lot is a corner lot with setback requirements for 2 acre lots. The applicant's property ’ was platted and developedprior to the adoption ofthe zoning ordinance. The actual lot size of this lot is about 1/3 of an acre. If even V: acre standards were applied to the property a 15'to side yard adjacent to street setback would be required, rather than 50'. This standard applies to the fence and garage. And. any garage with doors facing the street must be 30' from the lot line regardless of the district. The 5' garage setback to the rear properly line b ac^acetu to a platted alley that b not developed The actual distance to the neighboring property line and the garage would be The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. The condition of small lot size b unique in the RRdB District but similar to other properties in the Crystal Bay neighborhood The largest area ofthe rural part of the City is zoned RR- IB. However, much of the RR-IB dbtrict was developed at the two acre standard The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The garage would provide indoor parking for two vehicles. The existing garage only could provide parking for one vehicle. A 6'fence could be constructed in the proposed location if the •/: acre standards were applied. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safely, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. The fence would not impair the health, safety, comfort, morab. or in any other respect be contrary to the intent ofthe Zoning Code, The lack of setbackfrom the garage doors to the stret b a potential safety bsue. especially (fit resulu in cars perpetually parked in the right- •01 ru Miducr «d Monks Bfomi 1241 Brawn Road Soodi KVIStU PiB(4or5 of-way... The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hanlship or difficulty. Applicant’s hardship statement is attached Planning Commission should determine if the tree is a valid hardship, or if the garage could be relocated so as to maximize the street setback to more closely meet the 30'requirement. Options for Planning CommiMinn A. Recommend approval of the variances to allow the detached garage and fence in the location attached. B. Recommend approval with discussion of the size of the garage, could the garage be moved further from the property line if the size is reduced? C. Table and provide direction to the applicant to what possible revisions rhat can be made. D. Recommend denial, stating reasons. MI-2722 Mictad mi Monca htmm l24IBn>nlt<MdSoMi KyiMI PmiSoTS CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 (SSO.OO per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee SI50.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address l^Hl S*. AppUcatloa# Oi -“7.12.2. Date Received~5//tf/g/ ~ Amount Paid -^2 ^0 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)/o-ny-Xs 3i noZZ Attach legal description to application if not iiuluded on required survey. Dane Propotys^) PreschtuscTif^ .(month/year) Zoning District:. property:.other (specify). APPLICANT Name Phone (home) /«>*>/ -------- ■ ..-w Phone(v.urk) ^ ^ fJ ^ 9 Address:. { 2^V / Jt.Citv: zio: S’:f3TT * fiyztfJicAr 4- O^^^^if different than^applicant) Address?" I g.*y jT? Phone (home). ____ Phone (work) City: qrz. 97C-(>^of Zip: SJjTT DESCRIPTION OF REQUECT , Estimated Consiruciion Cost S Describe request in detail: RtpUcf^ c O O Describe request in detail: Ktplc.ee <!>/////vg ^ 2V'c 4,)' (attach additional sheets if necessary') VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: ___Lot Width ___Hardcover Front ^ Side Rear .Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore Other (specify) HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTiv..^ OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: 7o^,r^^ CoJ, Sb' J7Je/s-/^ct AH a M IT /m^Jc LIc ro C-^c ^ A W.C4y? c—tr rr uf/L4S^^ w,4k ^ rX^Ti if ccjt.^j (®|^ch additional sheets if necessary) , _ , •J uJiK^f)t,fkt>rf ^ar\A.lvt h< rtfkc t vJ.u\J -1.. .1^- 1 ^ ^ n a vJ ce o/ ^ O (j4A(i.0fH IP Com ' T *THc 'THa 6>vm<57C Qp’f J A^o/^ ■ficA-7 (K\\t^ uJvr A(ro Mcce/Pv^ '^'f~ G- k /Qa ^'j € ]^/^/e //* ' I 6*/Wl->^6>£: . T^Y/J- p/A/e l^oyjuo NJee^ "To B»e Ct/r o^u-j I ^ LJC. UJ‘0^€. -f-o -/cC4^C ^ Aje ^ Ca--^ -^?a/w ctos-e/i^ /o /7^. 7 a SuAyjz^0f>^ pc C o.'n^‘^e^£> o-> jpf rn •f^e /a/ /4 g /oc^'t/c^^ Sc z.y^ Uou/c{ jJe,e.o ^ p>Lc A7 prupo'^-'/y //*^i 4f /o/^ /Al ,r•*• * }T /Q '•V i'>^' o ■ >«»Ll.l.».-ffV^ ,i*wi Hennepin County Taxpayer Services PepPlrliri^nt-^ 6 (5tJ in dtOl^O ih^Parcel Information^ * ' ' 4 * * .• Parcel ID 1011723310066 i* House Number 1241 Street Name BROWN RO S Condominium This l» not*hgaHy ncofdadmap. ItnpeasantaaeompBallonof hhfv&n'y- arid data from Qty, County, and Stata road atOwribaa and othar aourcaxr. ;**• * J- *’ tUN DATE •7/Sl/tt lATCH StS WNNEflN COUNTY POOPCITV INTOONATION SVSTCN rtOrCRTV OMNiRS LIST KROOT NO. fXASMAl PACe R PROP ASM OWNCR NAME TAXPAYER NAHC/ADDR SR lR-117'23 11 MR2 •RtU ADDRESS UNASSIOKD nCLEOO CNTV REO RAIL AUTH DAKOTA HAIL INC 2S ADANS ST N HUTCHINSON HN SSS5R 30 10-117-23 24 0022 01212 ARDOR ST J R CADY S S R CADY S R CADY ■ J R CADY 1212 AROOR ST UAYZATA HN BSSRl SO 10-117-23 24 0023 0122S LAKEWIEM AVf M A JWO^^ON IAN PARNNAH W A JOHNSON RAN PAHNNAM 122B LAKEVIEM AVE UAYZATA HN SS341 PROP AOOR OWNER NAHC TAXPAYER NAHE/AOOR SO 10-117-2S 24 0024 0124S LAXEVICW AVE VIROINIA NORO CRIFFITHS VIROINXA NORO GRIFFITHS 124S LAXEVIEU AVE UAYZATA »M SS301 SR 10-117-2S 31 0022 012S1 BROUN RO S CRAIO U A JUBY D CHRISTENSEN CRAIO I JUDY CNRISTEKSEM 12S1 BROWN ROAD S UAYZATA fW SSS41 SO 10-117-23 31 0023 00030 AOORESS UNASSIONED CRAIO U 0 JUDY D CIRIISTENSEM CRAIO ■ JUDY CNRISTENUN 1251 BROUN ROAD S UAYZATA NN 55301 PROP AOOR OWNCR NAHE TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SO 10-117-23 31 0024 01Z7S BROWN RO S TOWN OP ORONO CITY OP ORONO PO OCX 00 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 SB 10-117-23 31 0024 01270 ARDOR ST J E FULLERTON IAN NOL02IO J E FULLERTON SAN HOLOZIO 1270 ARBOR ST UAYZATA HN 55341 3B 10-117-23 31 0030 01250 AROOR ST CARY P BURTON CARY P PARLEY 1250 ARBOR ST PO BOX 22 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 PROP ADDR OWNER NAHC TAXPAYER NAHE/AODR 3B 10-117-23 31 0051 0I2S0 AROOR ST CARY F BURTON CARY R PARLEY 1250 ARBOR ST PO BOX 22 CRYSTAL BAV M4 5SS2S SO 10-117-23 31 0004 01205 BROWN RO S ROGER A DAY ROGER A DAY 1205 BROUN RD S UAYZATA HN SSS41 SB 10-117-23 31 OOOS 01223 BROUN RO S CURTIS R OUADY CTAl CURTIS OUADY BOX 127 CRYSTAL BAY HN SSS2S PROP AOOR OWNER NAHC TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR SB 10-117-23 31 0044 01241 BROUN RO S N T BROUN SHE BROUN NONICA T t niCIUCL C BROWN 1241 BROUN RD S UAYZATA NN 55341 SB 10-117-23 SI 0044 01230 ARBOR ST P C NARTIN • C N NARTIN P C NARTIN B C N NARTIN 1230 ARBOR ST UAYZATA NN 55341 SB 10-117-23 31 0044 01240 ARBOR ST L S KENNCN A J H RELLAR LEONARD S KENNCN JANICE N KENNCN 1223 ARBOR ST UAYZATA HN 55341 PROP AOOR OWNER NAHC TAXPAYER NANE/AOOR TOTAL BATCH SOS 00015 sm sirs? 00^0 040^ II U H l"r20> I6KL)W/% Iu.H I ;\JJ V *. - '■ •»'••* •:• H (T> DKOWM (a'UNMWc- li-Hl VMJl J;v:-' c;x /•r ''u 'w r (I K) ' 1 icAut /«* -- r *------- # 1 .'aV• V. •/ ,\ ■c **»**^TINQ DfC 1 0 2001 Ui r urUHU/VO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 10. 2001 ITEM NO.: ^ DeparUnem Approval: N mbc Gregory A. Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Public Services's Directors Report Item Description: Establishment of a Siorm Water Utility and Fee Structure-Ordinance Introduction On November 13*“. the Council conducted a Public Hearing to consider the adoption of a Storm Water Utility. The fee will be based on a uniform fee per unit for all residential properties. Non-rcsidential properties will be cliarged a fee bas^ on the number of 'Residential Equivalent Factors' (REF) for the property. The proposed fee is $9.00 per quarter per residential unit. There was only one question from the public at this hearing. Cliff Otten inquired if there would be credit against the storm water utility fee for ponds that were constructed on his property at the time of developnicnt. Purpose of Storm Water Regulations The basic intent of stonn water regulations is to minimize tlic impact of development on natural drainage systems. Any development in an area will change tlic natural conditions by increasing tlie total volume of runoff and the level of pollutant loading. Storm water controls that limit die flow rate to the natural undeveloped conditions reduce the impacts from higher flow rates, but there will still be a greater volume of water flowing from the developed area. Water quality controls can reduce the impacts of greater pollutant loading from the site, but these controls cannot effectively remove all of the additioiul pollutants NURP ponds are designed to remove appro.ximatcly 50^ of the pollutants generated from the site. This means that development will still increase the pollutant loading over the natural conditions. As we have gained increasing knowledge of die impacts development has on natural drainage systems, the standards for stonn water controls have changed substantially over the years from no storm water controls being required to die comprehensive standards in place today. The result of these ever changing storm water regulations is that developments in Orono range from no storm water controls, to developments w idi only rate controls, and newer developmeiiis w ith both rale and water quality treaiment controls When developments were constructed, the developers were required to :..ect the rules that were in place for storm water controls at that time. Recognizing the fact that development does have permanent impacts on the natural drainage systems, and that stonn water rules have been developed to minimize these impacts; the concept of providing storm water utility fee credits for developments that incurred costs to ncet the storm water rules is not logical. Page I could be generated by these fees is rather limited as there is only a small amount of land still available for development in Orono. Therefore, the major source of funding for storm water maintenance and improvement projects will have to be storm water utility fees. This limited funding, from storm water utility fees, versus the substantial financial needs for stomi water systems is another valid reason to not reduce this revenue source by providing fee credits. Incentive Programs for Storm Water System Improvements The City of Plymouth has a storm water utility in place. They ore in the initial stages of developing an incentive program to encourage non*residential property owners to construct storm w'ater facilities. This intent of this incentive program is to encourage the construction of new or upgraded facilities on existing properties. However, it is not intended to credit propert)' owTiers for facilities that were previously insuillcd as a condition of development. The effectiveness of this program Is unknown and is somewhat uncertain based on the monetary value of the incentives in relation to the cost of constiucting new storm water control facilities. The incentive program being considered by Plymouth will require additional stafif resources to administer. Any incentive program will require review and approval of the proposed storm water controls, and a certification component to verify continued adequate operation of the facilities. In developing their incentive orogram the City of Plymouth has checked with other area cities and there were only a veiy small cit*cs in the process of developing incentive programs. The implementation of on incentise piogram to encourage improved siomi water facilities could possibly have some merit. However, the elTectiveness and the practicality of administration of the program are legitimate concerns. In summary, a program to credit property owners for previously constructed storm water improvements, especially in the case of the Otten property when these improvements do not meet current standanls and requirements does not enhance the fairness of the system; and does nothing to further the goal of reducing the adverse impacts of storm water runoff. Also, fee credits will actually reduce the funding available from the storm water utility to maintain and improve the storm water control systems in the city. The Otten site was developed about 15 years ago and the ponds provide some rate control b**ncfiis but would not meet current NURP Wa'xr Quality standards. If the site was developed today, a NURP pond would be required. This would rewilt in additional costs of about $25,000 plus the use of additional land for ponding purposes. The Council tabled adoption of the utility and directed suff to research this issue further. The staff recommendation is against providing a storm water utility fee credit to property owners for previously constructed storm water facilities. Council Action Requesteti Approval of the ordinance establishing a Storm Water Utility effective Jimuary 1,2002. Approval of a $9.00 per quarter per residential unit Storm Water Utility Fee to be included in the year 2002 City Fee Schedule. Page 3 OROINANCi: NO..SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORONO CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH A STORM WATER DRAINAGE UTILITY AND USER CILARGES FOR THE STORM WATER AND DRAINAGE UTILITY THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN: SECTION I. The following language is hereby added to ihe Orono City Code as Section 3.21- Rules and Regulations Relating to the Storm Water and Drainage Utility with ordinance to become effective January 1. 2002 with charges consistent with Section 3 applicable to all affected properties. Section I. Storm Sewer System: Statu* <rv Authority. Minnesota Statutes. Section 444.075, authorizes cities to impose just and reasonable charges for the use and availability of storm sewer facilities ("charges"). By this section, the city elects to exercise such authority. Section 2. Findings and Determinations. In providing for such charges, the findings and determinations set out in this subsection are made. a. In the exercise of its govenuncntal authority and in order to promote Ihe public health, safety, convenience and general welfare, the city has constructed, operated and mainiained a stomi sewer system ("the sy stem"). This section is adopted in the further exercise of such authority and for the .same purpose. b. The sy stem, as constructed, heretofore has been financed and paid for throui;h the imposition of special assessment:} and ad \alorem la.xes. Such financing methixls were appropriate to the circumstances at the time they were used. It is now necessary and desirable to provide an alternative method of recovering si'me or all of the future costs of improving, maintaining and operating the system through the imposition of charges as pros ided in this section. c. In imposing charges, it is necessary' to establish a methodology that undertakes to make them just and equitable. Taking into account, the status of completion of the system, past methods of recovering sy stem costs, the topography of the city' and other relevant factors, it is determined that it would be just and equitable to assign responsibility for some or all of the future costs of operating, maintaining and improving the sy stem on the basis of the expected storm water runoft from the various parcels of land w ithin the city during a standard 5-year rainfall event. d. Assigning costs and .taking charges based upon expected typical storm water runolT cannot be done vMth mathematical precision but cm only be accomplished within reasonable and practical limits. The pro\isions of this section undertake to establish a reasonable and practicable methodology for making such charges. Page 1 of 4 Section 3. Rales and Charges. Subd. I. Rwidgniial Equivalent Factor . Rales and charges for the use and availability of the system shall be determined through the use of a "Residential Equivalent Factor" ("REF"). For the purposes of this sv-ciion. one REF is defined as the average volume of surface water rtmoff coming from an average single family residential lot of 2.0 acres of land and 20% imperv ious surface. Subd. 2. neiermination of RHPs - Non- Residential Properties. REFs for all land uses other than residential uses shall be based on the percentage of impervious surface and size of the property as listed in the following table. The minimum fee for any property shall be one REF. i % ImpeniolU Roaoir (inches) REF/2 acre REF/1 acre 0 0 50 0 62 031 5 0S8 0 72 0 36 10 0 66 082 0 41 15 074 0 92 0 46 20 0.80 1.00 0.50 25 0 98 1 22 61 JO 1 16 145 0-J J5 1 J4 1 68 0 84 40 150 187 0 94 45 1.68 210 105 50 186 2 33 1 t6 55 2 04 2 55 1 23 60 220 2 'J / 38 65 2J8 2 98 1 49 '0 2 56 3 20 160 75 2~4 3 43 1 "2 80 2 90 3 62 181 85 308 3 85 1 93 90 3.26 402 201 95 3.44 4 30 2 15 too 3.60 4J0 2.25 Page 2 of 4 ‘if'iiltrtl'i liiifiti Section 4. F^tnhlishina Basic Rate. The basic system rale to be charged against an average single family residence shall be included in the Orono Fee Schedule and shall be changed as necessary by adoption of an ordinance ammending the fee schedule. The charge to be made against all other non-residential properties shall be made in accordance with Section 3. Section 5. Siandardi/ed Acreuue. For tlie purpose of simplifying and cquali/ing charges against property' used tor average single family residential purposes, such properties shall be considered to have an acreage of 2.0 acres. Section 6. Adjustments of Charges. The city council may by resolution, from time to time, adopt policies providing for the adjustment of charges for parcels or groups of parcels, based upon Hydrologic data supplied by affected properly o.mers, denionstraling an actual Hydrologic response substantially different from the REF being used for the parcel or parcels. Such adjustment shall be made only an»*r receiving the recommendation of the City Engineer and shall not be made effective retroactively. Section 7. Excluded Lands. No charge lor system availability or service shall be made against land which is either (i) public or private street right-of-way; (ii) vacant aiH unimproved land with substantially all of its surface having vegetation as ground cover or (iii) land owoed by the City of Orono (iv) park land owned by other governmental agencies. Section 8. Supplvint! Information. The owner, occupant or person in charge of any ptcmiscs shall supply the city with such information as the city may reasonably request related to the use, development and area of the premises. Willlul failure to provide such infomiaiion or to falsify it is a violation of'.his section. Section 9. Fstimaied Charues. If the owner, occupant or person in charge of any premises fails or refuses to provide the inlbrmation requested, as provided in Section 8. the charge for such premises shall be estimated and billed in accordance with such estimate, based upon information then available to the city. Section 10. Drainaee and Erosion Control . Subd. I. - prainage Plan. In the development, improvement or alteration of land, the direction, quantity or quality of drainage shall not be changed unless plans for the development are submitted to the City Engineer, and are found to be in compliance with the C'ty’s storm water management policies Run off shall be properly channeled into a storm drain, watercourse, ponding area or other public lacility. Subd. 2. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. Prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit for any development, improvement or alteration of land, a plan for erosion and sedimentation control shall be presented with the site plan. The erosion and sedimentation control plan shall specify the measures to be used before, during and after construction until the soil and slope are stabilized by pennanent cover. These control measures shall be maintained in good working order until site stabilization occurs. Subd. 3. Approval. Plans and provisions required for compliance with this subsection must be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Page 3 of 4 SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be published in THE PIONEER and THE LAKER and shall be cffecUNe January 1,2002. Adopted by ihe City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at its regular meeting held the 10* day of December, 2001. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee. City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor Page 4 of 4 jiT REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: November 13, 2001 ITEM NO.: 2. Department Approval: Name Gregory A. Gapp^ Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed: Item Description: Public Hearing on EstabiiShmem of a Storm Water Utility Agenda Section: Public Scrvtccs's Directors Report Introduction Municipalities create sterm water utilities so that dedicated funds are available to operate, maintain, manage, construct or reconstruct their municipal storm water drainage systems. In the past, special assessments against benefitting properties, or general tax revenue financed most storm water improvements. These financing methods have not been uniformly successful in providing sufficient revenue. Applying assessments requires proof of benefit and it is difficult to prove a benefit to upstream properties in tlie drainage area. Recently, assessments have been successfully challenged in the courts, since tlien it has become increasingly difficult to prove benefit against assessed properties. Most commonly. Cities draw from the general fund to finance municipal improvement projects. With its levy limits for municipalities, the State Legislature has limited the ability to hind projects in this manner. For the past several years, the City of Orono has included a $45,000 tax levy for the storm water improvements in the PIR Fund. As a result of the tax levy limits, the City's ability- to adequately fund the year 2002 budget was limited. At the budget work session the Council directed staff to remove the $45,000 PIR budget item from the tax levy and to begin the process for the implementation of Storm Water Utility. A storm water utility is a dedicated revenue source intended to alle.iatc the burden on general funds and avoid the time and expense of assessment proceedings. All Minnesota cities, under MSS 444.075, can establish a storm water utility. Essentially, the storm water utility is identical to a water or sanitary sewer utilih. in which the utility's users finance the utility's infrastructure costs. A "user" is normally defined as any developed property that contributes storm water runoff to the storm drainage system. City owned property, park properties owned by oilier governmental units, and undeveloped privately owned larids do not fund utility. Typically, the City charges the storm water utility* fee to all use;s’ wiih die fee based on the amount of runoff that each property generates. The runoff geneiated relates directly to the amount of impervious area found on llie property. Consequently, a property with more impervious area uses »he sy stem to a greater extent than a property with less hard surface Page 1 The average lot size in each of the zoning districts, '/i, 1,2, & 5 acre districts, was determined by dividing the number of acres in each district by the projected number of homes at full development in each district. The average lot size for the City was calculated by using a weighted average of the percentage of homes in each zoning district at the previously calculated average lot size for that district. Approximately 50% of the homes in Orono are in the 2-acre district, 45% are in the % & 1 acre districts, and 5% in the 5-acre district The weighted average lot size was determined to be 2 acres The use of an average residential lot size is the only practical method for implementation of a storm water utility and is also equitable. The smaller lots may have less impervious surface, than the larger lots, but the runoff rate is increased because of less pervious lot area to slow the water down and allow for infiltration into the ground. The runoff rate determines the size of the storm water facilities required. The larger lots may have more impervious surface, than the smaller lots, but the rtinoff rate is decreased because of the larger pervious lot area to slow the water down and allow for infiltration into the ground. The average single family residential lot runoff defines the fee structure's basic unit, the "Residential Equivalency Factor" (REF). Nor.-residential parcels will be assigned REF values based on the amount of nmoff ge**- rated by these parcels versus the amount generated by the typical single family residential lot. This PXF will be determined based on the acreage and percentage of impervious surface for each non-residential lot. The following table provides a listing of per acre REF factors based on the percentage of impervious surface for the parcel. The total fee is determined by multiplying the REF factor from die table by the acreage of the parcel. The REF cannot be less than one for billing purposes. % Impcnrioas Rhbo IT (faichcs) REF/2 acre REF/1 acre 0 050 062 0 31 5 058 0 72 0 36 10 066 082 0 41 15 0 74 0 92 0 46 20 0.80 1.00 0.S0 25 0 98 122 61 30 1.16 1.45 0.73 35 1.34 : 68 084 40 1.50 187 0 94 45 168 210 IC5 50 1.86 2 33 f 16 55 2 04 2 55 123 60 2.20 2 75 t 38 65 2 38 2 98 149 70 2 56 3 20 160 75 2.74 343 172 80 2 90 3 62 181 85 3.08 3 85 1 93 90 326 402 2 01 95 3 44 4 30 2 15 100 3.60 4.50 2.25 Fee rite There are approximately 3,000 existing homes in Orono today with full development projected at about 3.700 homes. There are currently about 350 REF units of non-resideniial property in the City. This number of units is not projected to increase significantly at full development because of the minor amount of non-residentiol property in Orono. Today, there are is a total of approximately 3,350 REF units for billing purposes. The Council discussed thb issue at the October 22** meeting and established a fee of $9.00 per quarter per residential unit. Attached to this report is a listing of the non-residcntlal properties in the City wiui their number of REF units. The owners of property with five o*- more units were sent a letter notifying them of the public hearing. A sample letter is attach^ for review. Staff has not received any public comments regarding the proposed Storm Water Utility. Storm Water Projects The proposed $9.00 quarterly fee will generate approximately $120,000 in annual revenue. Tne Storm Water Management Plan lists approximately $11 million dollars of storm w-ater projects for both water qualit>- and quantity improvements. These arc the larger projects in the City. Attached for your review is a list of $I .2 million dollars in Priority Capital Improvement Projects from the Storm Water Management Plan. In addition to the project listed in the plan, there are also numerous smaller projects that need to be completed These smaller projects are generally located in the older fully developed areas of the City and adjacent to the lakeshore. These projects are needed to solve local flooding problems and prevent property damage to homes. Several problem areas include. Crystal Bay Road. Highwood Road, and Lyric Avenue, llie Highwood Road project is the result of a failing older draintilc sys'em that is an integral component of the required storm water drainage system in this area. There arc numerous situations '.ike this in the City with older draintilc systems across private properties that are in questionable or unknc wn condition. These systems were installed years ago. by private property owners, with no casements in place or any records of construction. The costs for replacement or repair of these systems arc unknown. As the trend of tearing down existing houses and rebuilding larger homes along the lakeshore accelerates, we have been c.xperiencing more complaints and concerns about flooding and increased runoff. A ty pical exampi of this is the recent problems encountered along Caroline Avenue as the result new larger homes being built. Several years ago, the City spent $60,000 for u project to prevent flooding problems in the Tonkav iew Lane/ North Shore Drive area caused by vacant lots being developed. RccomnieDdatioiis 1. Conduct a public bearing on the implementation of a Storm Water Drainage Utility. 2. Approval of tne ordinatKC establishing a Storm Water Drainage Utility effective January 1. 2002. 3. Approval of a $9.00 per quarter per residential unit Storm Water Drainage Utility Fee to be included in the year 2002 City Fee Schedule. Table 7.18 Priority CIP Projects iWS ■mrtaiOiWUlsn Carman Bay Pond CB-Q3 (1)19,000 Pond SB^16(I)15,000 Roadside techniques along Blaine Ave in subdlstilcts CB-0 and CB-2 (II) 9.000 Ravine stabilization In subdistrict LC-23 (1)108.000 Pond CB-Q9 (1)20.000 Pond LOQ1000 (1)33.000 Forest Lake Pond SB-Q9.1 (II)110.000 Ravine stabilization in subdistrict FL-19 (1)63.000 Ravine stabilization in subdistrict SB-9 (II)135,000 Pond FL-Q15(I)18,000 PondSB-Q5 (II)13.000 Roadside techniques In subdistricl FL-0 (II)18,000 Ravine stabilization in subdistrict SB-S (II)68.000 Ravine stabilization in subdistrict FL-20 (1)108,000 Pond 3B-Q11 (II)23.000 Maxwell Bay Roadside techniques along Bayside Road (II)?0.000 Pond MB-Q7 (II)47.000 Roadside techniques along Tonkawa Road (II)15,000 North Arm t inager Lake Ravine stabilization In subdistrict NA-0, extending SW from node 500 (1) 72,000 Study flow at top of sub district TL-11/node 901 (1)19,000’ Pond NA-09 (1)47,000 Roadside techniques along Browns Road S (II)27,000 Ravine stabilization at north end of subdislrict NA-0, near pond NA-Q8000 (II) 72.000 Roadside techniques along Shoreline Drive (II)27,000 Ravine stabilizaUon at north end of subdistrict NA-0 (II)72.000 1 TOTAL 1.188,000 Ji lor ravfn* •taUbattwi. cotts V* tsomaies only MMd on $90 ptf kiMr foor * Study costs of S4000 ptr ytar lor (bur y«an. plus MSal pufchast of umpbtg •quipmtnt S3.0QO * per iMsr foot costs rtprosont on bvorsoo o««r dw ItflgOi of tho protect sto Non-Rcsidcnlial Properties Addreti •s 2389 Blaine Ave 3250 North Shore Dr 3324 North Shore Dr 450 Old Crystal Bay Rd N 2380 Shadywood Dr 2385 Shadywood Dr 2420 Shadywood Dr 2445 Shadywood Dr 2455 Shadywood Dr 2477 Shadywood Dr 2500 Shadywood Dr 1444 Shoreline Dr 1449 Shoreline Dr 1955 Shoreline Dr 3333 Shoreline Dr 3340 Shoreline Dr 3360 Shoreline Dr 3380 Shoreline Dr 3400 Shoreline Dr Nftmt OfTice Building North Shore Marina Wayzata Marina VCI Snyders Daghmers Navarre Auto Repair 1 National Bank England Dentist Tonkawesi OfTiccs Freshwater Windward Marina Kings Cove Marina Saiiors World Ricks Super Value Culvers Amoco Multi-Tenant Navarre Hardware £U> Asm % IMP. 17-117-23-34-0012 0.68 100% 08-117-23-41-0006 2.60 60% 08-117-23-41-0012 1.90 85% 33-118-23-1300-12 4.96 37% 17-117-23-44-0006 0.83 74% 17-117-23-44-0102 0.19 40% 20-117-23-11 -0002 0.87 80% 20-117-23-11-0015 0.53 73% 20-117-23-11-0017 0.40 42% 20-117-23-11-0027 1.32 37% 20-117-23-11-0034 5.00 32% 11-117-23-22-0006 0.41 75% 11-117-23-21-0001 1.87 75% 10-117-23-42-0024 0.74 65% 20-117-23-11 -0024 2.90 75% 17-117-23-44-0085 1.34 90% 17-117-23-44-0101 0.44 100% 17-117-23-44-0100 0.26 100% 17-117-23-43-0099 0.28 100% NttBibcr REF(I) UlftR. 2.25 1.38 1.93 0.84 1.60 0.94 1.81 1.60 0.94 0.84 0.73 1.72 1.72 1.49 1.72 201 2.25 2.25 2.25 1.5 3.5 3.6 4.1 1.3 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.1 3.6 1.0 3.2 1.1 4.9 2.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 Number Page 1 Address Kaffl£Pin Ami 3416 Shoreline Dr 3423 S^relinc Dr 3440 Shoreline Dr 3465 Shoreline Dr 3496 Shoreline Dr 3502 Shoreline Dr 3542 Shoreline Dr 3572 Shoreline Dr 3574 Shore''-e Dr 3596 Shoreline Dr 3605 Shoreline Dr 3607 Shoreline Dr 3701 Sliorclinc Dr 3850 Shoreline Dr 3860 Shoreline Dr 875 WayzaUi Dlvd 2060 Wayzata Dlvd 2120 Wayzata Dlvd 2160 Wayzata Dlvd 2190 Wayzata Dlvd 2350 Wayzata Dlvd 2605 Wayzata Dlvd 2687 Wayzata Dlvd 2725 Wayzata Dl- 5 3505 Wayzata Dlvd 3800 Wayzata Dlvd Multi-Tenant Richard Keaveny Richard Dloomquist Shoreline Center Village ProfT. Dldg Loy/ells Auto Porta LNR Property Animal Hospital Dairy Queen G & P Cabinets Qwest Mika A-1 Rental Casco Run Offices Furniture Store Shoreline Service Center New Horizon Sidney Rebels Wear Wear Green Valley Ollcn Nursery Washington Scientific Ace Prop Veda Dog 1 louse Otten Management 17-117.23-43-0098 2P 117-23-12-0034 17-117-23-43-0142 20-117-23-12-0033 17-117-23-43-0155 17-117-23-43-0114 17-117-23-43-0113 17-117-23-43-0151 17-117-23-43-0149 17-117-23-43-0107 20-! 17-23-21-0028 20-117-23-21-0029 20-117-23-21-0033 17-117-23-33-0006 17-117-23-33-0005 35-118-23-44-0005 34-118-23-24-0058 34-118-23-24-0001 34-118-23-21-0002 34-118-23-21-0033 34-118-23-22-0014 33-118-23-13-0015 33-118-23.13-0002 33.118- 23.13-OOK 32-118-23-13-0001 29.118- 23-34-0009 0.54 1.64 0.15 0.95 0.31 0.31 0.46 0.31 0.45 0.62 087 1 16 3 64 0.77 0.62 5.34 6.70 0.87 1.55 0.93 10.00 26.70 2.04 9.16 6.00 1.85 Vm IMP.RRFm UoilL 46%1.05 1.0 5.5% 1.23 1.9 40%0.94 1.0 29%0.61 1.0 50%1.16 1.0 80%1.81 1.0 40%0.94 I.O 70%1.60 I.O 80%1.81 I.O 60%1.38 1.0 27%0.61 1.0 15%0.46 1.0 6%0.36 1.3 40%0.94 1.0 24%0.50 1.0 6V.0.36 1.9 PENDING SUDDIVISION 45%1.05 1.0 95%2.15 3.3 60%1.38 1.2 55%1.23 12.3 30%0.73 19.4 50%1.16 2.3 37%0.84 7.6 3%0.36 2.1 17%0.46 1.0 Number Page 2 AddreM Name PIP Acres Vm IMP.RF.p m UniiL 2420 Dunwoody Ave Calvary Memorial Church 20-117-23-21-0018 2.60 35%0.84 2.2 865 FbmduleRdN Sl Edward Episcl. Church 25-118-23-44-0002 4.30 11%0.41 1.8 117 Glendale Dr Calvin Presb. Church 34-118-23-33-0001 6.00 13%0.41 2.4 525 Leaf St New Thought Church 05-117-23-41-0020 4.46 21%0.50 2.2 3745 Shoreline Dr Good Shepard Lutheran Church 20-117-23-21-0025 4.80 18%0.46 2.2 2060 Sixth Ave Trinity Lutheran Church 27-118-23-31-0002 4.90 27%0.61 2.9 3655 Togo Rd Jehovah Witness 17-117-23-31-0036 1.35 43%0.94 1.2 645 Tonkawa Rd Temple Israel of Mpis 05-117-23-33-0019 18 JO 1%0.31 5.6 200 Old Long Uke Rd Wayzata Country Club 36-118-23-43-0001 145 1%0.31 44.0 405 North Arm Dr W Lakeview Golf Course 06-117-23-32-0003 137 1%0.31 42.0 265 Orono Orchard Rd S Orono Golf Course 02-117-23-22-0005 45 1%0.31 13.0 725 Sixth Ave Spring Hill 25-118-23-33-0004 146 1%0.31 44.0 200 Wood Hill Rd Wood Hill Country Club 02-117-23-12-0001 121 1%0.31 37.0 2180 North Shore Dr Lake Minnka Envir School 10-117-23-31-0098 0.58 28%0.61 I..0 2240 North Shore Dr Minnka Center for Arts 10-117-23-32-0019 5.65 37%0.84 4.7 2100 Sixth Ave Orono Woodlands 27-118-23-31-D024 2.47 11%0.41 1.0 685 Old Crystal Day Rd Administration Orono School 33-118-23-21-0002 50 12%0.41 20.0 1025 Old Crystal DayRd 1 ligh Scltool/ Ice Arena 28-118-23-34-0003 44 13%0.41 18.0 800 Old Crystal Day Rd Middle School/ Lee Carlson 28-118-23-42-005 52 10%0.41 21.0 REF (1) ■■ Residential Equivalent Factor Page 3 roi„„, ...:rTiMO REQirEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DEC I 0 2001 CIIY CW DATE: Dcccmtw 10.2001 ITEM NO.: ^ Department Approval: Name Gregory A Gappa Title Director of Public Services Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Services's Directors Repotl Item Description: Adoption of a Storm Water aivi Drainage Trunk Fee -Ordinance Surface Water Management Plan Over the post several years, the City has been working on tlie development of a surface water management plan which includes pr.liminary design of a comprehensive storm water system for the City. One of the recommendations in this plan is to establish a storm water trunk fee (hat is applicable when properties arc developed or r^eveloped. The Surface W'ater Management Plan has been discuss^ at several Council work sessions at which there was a consensus to move forward with the recommendation to implement a storm water trunk fee. Storm Water Trunk Fee The surface water management plan contains discussion and recommendations on two common funding sources for the construction, operation, and maintenance of a stomi water system. One of these funding sources is the creation of a storm water utility in which properties arc charged a quarterly storm water fee. The stonn water utility is on the agenda for approval at this Council meeting. The other common funding source for financing a storm water management program is storm water trunk fees that apply to new development and redevelopment of existing properties The Council has prev iously reviewed and discussed this topic in the surface water management plan development process. The trunk fee is based on the land use and acreage of the property being developed and the fee is payable at the time the property is developed. The trunk fee prov ides the necessary funds for construction of the storm water infrastructure necessary to serve new developments in the city. The implementation of a storm trunk fee in a timely manner is important to enable the City to colle-.t itorm water tnmk fees as properties arc developed. In general, storm water trunk fees arc calculated by dividing the total cost of sys»?m construction, by the number developable acres the system will serve. The appropriate base trunk fee per acre, to be used on a ciiywide basis, is determined using this methodology. Based on a review of the S- year Capital Improvement plan in the storm water plan, staff is recommending a base trunk fee of S2.700 per acre for the year 2002. This fee will be reviewed and adjusted on an annual basis in the future Page-1- Recognizing that difTcrenl t>pes of land use generate difrcrcnl amounts of storm i^-atcr runoff, an equisaicney factor multiplier is assigned to each land use type. The 2-acrc residential lot is considemd as the standard in the city because a large percentage of the land in the city is zoned for 2 acre single family residential land use. The 2 acre single family residential lot will be assigned an equivalency factor of 1.0. The table below lists the equivalency factors for difl'crcnl land uses. These equivalency factors will be applied to the base trunk fee per acre. The table below lists the equivalency factors and storm waiter trunk fees per acre for the various zoning districts and land uses in the city. This table is based on the proposed base fee of $2,700 per acre Land l>tr Single Family Residential 5 Acre Zone (I) Single Family Residential 2 Acre Zone Single Family Residential I Acre Zone Single Family Residential '/i Acre Zone Multi Family Residential 4 Units/Acre or Less Multi Family Residential Greater than 4 Units/Acre Commercial or Industrial Lquivaicney Factor 1.5 2.1 Trunk Fee/ Acre $2,160 $2,700 $3,510 $4,050 $4,860 $5,670 $6,480 (I) For the 5-acre zoning district, a reduction of up to 50*o of the trunk fee for the lot will be allowed for the percentage of the lot protected by perimeter and'or drainage way buffer easements These buffer easement areas shall remain in a natural condition New de\eli>pment projects will pay the base trunk fee per acre of land developed adjusted using the appri'priatc hmd use equivalency factor. Redevelopment projects will be defined as any project to either remove and replace existing structures or to enlaige existing structures. These projects will be charged a portion of the base trunk fee adjusted for the area of expansion of imperv ious surface above the existing conditions , The table below lists the percentage of the acreage base trunk fee based on the area of imperv ious surface expansion and adjusted for the ty^pc of land use. The trunk fee will be based on the appropriate fee multiplied by the acreage of the development property. Page 2 I Area of Impervious Surface Eipansiou RcsMcutial Dcvclopnicut Percentage 2 Acre Single Family Residential Base Trunk Fee/Acre Coamicrclal or Industrial Percentage of Commercial/Industrial Base Trunk Fee/Acre 0-1000 Square Feet 35%$950 35%$2,270 1000-2000 Squxue Feet 70% $1,890 70%$4,535 More than 20t*J Square Feet 100%$2,700 100*^$6,480 Rccoi The staff recommeiNlation is for approval of the attached resolution that establishes storm u-ater trunk fees effective December 10. 2001. The establishment of storm >%*ater trunk fees nou will allow the city to collect these fees on upcoming development and redevelopment projects. The staff recommendation is to establish a base storm water trunk fee of S2.700 per acre for the 2* acre zoning district with the fee schedule to include the applicable fees for other land uses in the city. Council Action Requested Approval of the attached resolution establishing a storm water trunk fee to be effective on December 10,2001 Approval of a base storm water trunk fee of $2,700. Page3of 3 i ORDINANCE NO..SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORONO CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH A STORM WATER AND DRAINAGE TRi'NK FEE THE CITY OF ORONO. MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN; SECTION I. The following language is hereby added to the Orono City Code os Section 3.22- Rules and Regulations Establishing a Storm Water and Drainage TrunV Fee with ordinance to become effective December 10. 2001 with charges consistent with Section 3 applicable to all alTected properties. Section I. Storm Sewer System- Statutory Authority. Minnesota Statutes. Section 444.075. authorizes cities to impose just and reasonable charges for the use and availability of storm sewer facilities ("charges"). By this section, the city elects to e.xcrcise such authority'. Section 2. Findings and Dctcrmin-itions. In pro\ iding for such charges, the Findings and determinations set out in this subsection are made. a. In the e.xercise of its governmental authority and in order to promote the public health, safety. conNcnience and general welfare, the city has constructed, operated and maintained a storm sewer system ("the system”). This section is adopted in the further exercise of such authority and for the same purpose. b. The system, as constructed, heretofore has been financed and paid for through the imposition of special assessments and ad valorem taxes. Such financing methods were appropriate to the circumstances at the time they were used. It is now necessary and desirable to provide an alternative method of recovering some or all of the future costs of improving, maintaining and operating the system through the imposition of charges as provided in this section. c. Development or redevelopment of land changes the characteristics of the storm water runoff from the property and results in the nc*ed for improved storm water facilities, and also increases the demand on the storm water system which results in greater maintenance and operational costs of the sy stem c. In imposing charges, it is necessary to establish a methodology that undertakes to make them ji'<^t and equitable. Taking into account, the status of completion of the sy stem, past methods of recovering sy stem costs, the topography of the city and other relevant factors, it is determined that it w ould be just and equitable to assign responsibility for some or all of the future costs of operating, maintaining and improving the system on the basis of the acreage of land to be developed or redeveloped. d. Assigning costs and making charges based upon expected ty pical storm water runoff cannot be done with mathematical precision but can only be accomplished within reasonable and practical limits. The provisions of this section undertake to establish a reasonable and practicable methodology for making such charges. Page 1 of 4 Section 3. Rates and Charges. Subd. 1. Siomi \^'atcr Trunk Fee Dctcrminalion The city has developed a Surface Water Management Plan that includes design criteria for storm water systems and preliminaiy design information for a comprehensive storm water system in the city. In general, storm water trunk fees arc calculated by dividing the total cost of system construction, by the number developable acres the s> stem will serve. The appropriate base trunk fee per acre, to be used on a citywide basis, shall be determined as necessary using this methodology. Subd. 2. Acreayc Equivalency Factors Recognizing that different ty pes of land use generate different amounts of storm water runoff, an equivalency factor multiplier is assigned to each land use type. The 2-acre residential lot is considered as the standard in the city because a large percentage of the land in the city is zoned for 2 acre single family residential land use. The 2 acre single family residential lot will be assigned on equivalency factor of 1.0. The table below lists the equivalency factors for different land uses. These equivalency factors will be applied to the base trunk fee per acre. Land Use Equivalency Factor Single Family Residential 5 Acre Zone (1)0.8 Single Family Rc'sidential 2 Acre Zone 1.0 Single Family Residential 1 Acre Zone 1.3 Single Family Residential'/] Acre Zone 1.5 Multi Family Residential 4 Units/Acre or Less 1.8 Multi Family Residential Greater than 4 Units/Acre 2.1 Commercial or Industrial 2.4 (1) For the 5-acre zoning disuict. a reduction of up of 50* « of the trunk fee for the lot will be allowed for the percentage of the lot protected by perimeter and'or drainage way buffer casements. These buffer easement areas shall remain in a natural condition. Section 4. Establishing Storm Water Trunk Fee Charges. The Storm Water Trunk Fee Charges, for various land uses, shall be included in the Orono Fee Schedule and shall be changed us necessary by adoption of an ordinance amending the fee schedule. Section S. New Development Projects New development projects shall pay the base trunk fee per acre of land developed adjusted using the appropriate land use equivalency fKtor. Page 2 of 4 Section 6. Redevelopment Proiccts. Rcdc\elopmcnt projects shall be defined as any project to cither remove and replace existing structures or to enlarge existing structures. These projects will be charged a portion of the base tiiink fee adjusted for the area of expansion of impervious surface above the existing conditions. The table below lists the percentage of the acreage base trunk fee based on the area of imperv ious surface expansion and adjusted for the type of land use. The trunk fee shall be determined by multiplying the appropriate fee by the acreage of the development site Area of Inpcrvioas Residential Deveiopment Commercial or Industrial Surface Expansion Percentage of 2 Acre Single Percentage of Family Residential Commcrcial/lndustrial Base Trunk Fee/Acre Base Trunk Fee/Acre 0-1000 Square Feet 35%35% 1000-2000 Square Feet 70*.i 70* • More than 2000 Square Feet 100*i 100 “. Section 8. Adjustment of Storm Water Trunk Fee Charges The intent of the storm water trunk fee is to provide funding for improvements to the storm water system as the result of dev elopment in the city. Current regulations require property owners to provide sionn water treatment for the stomi water from the development property. The city reserves the right to develop policies to provide storm water trunk fee credits for stonn water improvements on developing properties that provide additional treatment benefits beyond what is required to treat the storm water runofl’from the development site. Section 9. Payment of Storm Water Trunk Fee Charges All applicable Storm Water Trunk Fee charges shall be paid in full before any building or land alteration permits are issued for the project. Section 10. Supplying Information. Ilie owner, occupant or person in charge of the subject property shall supply the city with such information as the city may reasonably request related to the use. development and area of the property Willful failure to provide such information or to falsify it is a violation of this section. Section 11. Drainage and Frosion C’ontrol. Subd. I. - Drainage Plan. In the development, improvement or alteration of land, the direction, quantity or quality of drainage shall not be changed unless plans for the dev elopment arc submitted to the City Engineer, and arc found to be in compliance with the city's storm water management policies. Run off sliall be properly channeled into a stonn drain, watercourse, ponding area or other public facility. Subd. 2. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan . Prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit for any dev elopment, improvement or alteration of land, a plan for erosion and sedimentation control shall be presented with the site plan. The erosion and sedimentation control plan .shall specify the measures to be used before, during and afier construction until the soil and slope are stabilized by permanent cover. These control measures shall be maintained in good working order until site stabilization occurs. Page 3 of 4 Subd. 3. Approval. Plans and provisions required for compliance with this subsection must be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective upon ^proval and published in THE PIONEER and THE LAKER newspapers. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at its regular meeting held the 10* day of December 2001. ATTEST: Lindas. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Page 4 of 4 4 ^ DEC 1 0 2001 DATE: December 10. 2001 Cl IY ur Unuivo item NO.7 Dcpartacal Apprm aI: Nanc Gregor> A Gappa Title Director of Public Services Adminiitnitor Reviewed:Ageada Section: Public Services's Directors Report lien Descriptkia: Approve Excel Energy Street Lighting Agreement The Orono Am bar Senior Housing project includes a City TIF financed project to install decorative street lights along 1 lighway 12 to match the lights in Long Lake. The street lights in Long Lake were installed by Excel Energy under a Group 5 lighting agreement in w hich Excel Energy owns, operates and maintains the lights. This is the same type of agreement \>e ha\ c for the Nav arre parking lot lights that were installed last year. The costs for this project w ill be repaid with TIF funds beginning in year 21 of the TIF agreement. A separate account has been established for this project to track expenses and revenues. There arc no funds in this account, so completion of this project will require a loan from another source be placed into this account. Our recommendation is that a loan be obtained from the General Fund for completion of this project. Council Action Requested Approviil of the attached agreement with Excel Energy, in the amount of S27.528. to install decorative street lights along Highway 12 in the vicinity of the Orono Ambar senior housing dev*elopment. Approval of a loan from the general fund, in the amount of S27.528. to the TIF fund project account for the Orono Ambar project. Loan to repaid with proceeds from the project’s TIF funds. ! I @ XcBlEnergy- OUTDOOi LIOMTINO 1971 Gattway Boulavanj Anitn HINa. MInntaota SS113 27S0 Gmomgr City of Orooo WiHing Aildrgis: 27S0 Kelly Paikway P O Box 66 Giv: Cfvwal Bay Stale: MN Zip Code; 55323 Projert chames of: Twenty-ievcn thousand five hundred tyt^entv-eigfai___________Dollars: $27,528.00 In accordance with the following tenns of payinenL- 30 da>*s after coostnictioo betPM_______________ For Aisociatioo orCkyof: CkyofOrooo ______________________________^__________ Srr»»»tl»|^tc/Fadlities 1 ocatinn: Wayzau BKd. from Shauthnesiy Cir. to Brown Road North Service co nsisting of: The installation of a Designer Plus (Group 5) streetlight system consisting of the following material: 6 -100 Watt HPS high p^omunce Acorn fixtures with ^oto controls • Green in color 6 • 14' Washington fluted aluminum poles green in color all siith CFI receptacles installed 6 • screw in anchor bases Conduit and wire installed by plow method No restoration included This contract is valid for 30 days Customer and Xcel Energy Outdoor Lighting agree to the attached terms and conditions. Dated this day of. Customcn ChyofOooo By: _____________ Title: Dated this day of. Xcel Energy Outdoor Lighting Title: Lighting Consultant XCEL ENERGY USE ONLY 1 Date:11/20/01 1 Div:shrwd Xed Energi’ Outdoor Lighting Consultant Olson Xcd Energy’ Proyca Number Customer Charges Paid: Xcd Energy Proprietary It Confidential Page 1 of 2 11/20/01 'Q XcelEnergy- OUrOOOl UGHTING 1971 G«tn»ay Bouitvard Arden HiHt. Minneeota Mil 2 2750 In this agreement. Northern States Power Gxnpany d/b/a Xcel Energy is called “Xcel Energy* and the Gtstomer is called *1” or *m) Customer and Xcel Energy agree to the following terms and conditions; 1. Request for Outdoor Lighting Services. I request that Xcel Energy install outdoor lighting at the location designated above and/or the approximate location as shown on the attached exhibit. I grant Xcel Energy any right, privilege and easement to install, operate and maintain its underground facilities on the propert)’. 2. Installation Requirements. I agree that, prior to Xcel Energ>’ starting work: (1) the route of Xcel Encrg)’’$ service instaOation shall be accessible to Xcel Energ>'*s equipment; (2) I will remove all obstructions from the route at no cost or expense to Xcel Energ)’; (3) I will clearly mark all septic tanks, drain-fields, sprinkler s>’stems, water wells, owner-installed electric or pipeline facilities, or other customer-owned facilities in the installation routr, and (4) the ground elevation along the route shaO not be above or more than four inches below the final grade. Xcel Energy’ will contact Gopher State One Call to locate 3^ part}' utilit>* facilities (phone, cable, etc.) on my propert>*. I agree Xcel Energy is not responsible for damage to customer-owned underground facilities not marked at the time of outdoor lighting service installation. 3. Installation Cost Contribution. I agree to pay an installation cost contribution provided in Project Charges on page one. I undentand that I am responsible for any additional installation costs incurred b>’ Xcel Energ}* because of (1) soil conditions that impair the installation of underground facilities, such as rock fomutions, etc., and (2) sidewalks, curbing, black top, paving, sod or other landscaping and obstructions along the cable route, such as extensive e.xisting underground facilities, etc. 4. V'inter Construaion Charges. I understand VCmter Construaion Quuges mav- apply if underground facilities are installed between October 1 and April 15. When construction scheduling does not permit installation of underground facilities to be completed prior to Oaober 1 or after April 15 and 3^el Energ}’ determines winter conditions exist, I agree to pay Winter Construction Qu^es if I request Xed Energ}' to complete the construction during aforementioned time. Xcel Energ}’ will agree to complete installation at m>’ request if w-inter condition exists with a frost line of less than 6 inches. If w*inter conditions exist with a frost line 6 inches or above, construction w-ill be scheduled for after April 15. 5. Restoration. Xcel Energy will restore the boulevard and will backfill the service trench on m>- propertv ’ with existing soil so the trench is level and cleaa I am responsible for the final compacting, loam seeding, sod or watering of service trench at m}* eiqiense. 1 will also be responsible for restoration in areas w here I have exposed mv* underground facilities listed above. * Relocating Facilities. I agree to pay the cost of relocating any portion of said underground facilities made to accommodate me or required due to altering of grade, additions to structures, instaUations of patios, decks, gardens, sidewalks, curbing, paving, blacktop, sod, landscaping or any other condition which makes maintenance of the Xcel Energ}’*s facilities impractical 7. Ownership of Facilities. The entire ornamental streetlight system including underground cables, conduit, posts, lamps, ballast, starters, photocells, and glusware instaDed by Xcel Energ}', shall be the property of Xed Energy. I have no ownership interests or righu in these facilities. Any pa>menu I make or toy contraaor shaD not give entitlement to at^ ofwnership intcr«t or ri^s thereia Xcel Energy Proprietary & Confidential Page 2 of 2 11/20/01 DEC 1 0 2001 C^ITU^onul^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 10.2001 ITEM NO.: ^ Dcpirtneal Approval: Naaic Gregory A. Gappa Titk Director of Public Services Adminiitnitor Reviewed:Agenda Section: Public Ser\ ices's Directors Report lleni Description: Lift Station Pump Control Panel Replacements The 2001 Sewer Capital Improvement Budget included S30.000 each for three lift stations to replace the pumps and conut>l panels. These three stations were constructed in 1971 as part of the Saga Hill/Torest Lake Area S^itary Sewer Project. Approval for the pump replacements has already been obtained. The total cost for the pump replacements is $40,000. so there is $50,000 left in the budget for the control panel replacements We have obtained quotations for the installation of new control panels in these lift stations. The lowest quote was from Electric Pump of Minneapolis. These new panels will be large enough for the future installation of SC ADA equipment. Lift Station #16 $11,710 Lift Station # 17 $11,710 Lift Station #19 $11,710 Total Cost $35,130 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to occept quotation from Electric Pump. Minneapolis MN for lift station control panel replacements in the amount of $35,130 rVvMMH •»»-frnMQ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION OEC 1 0 2001 Cut or un«jr«o DATE: December 6.2001 ITEM NO: ^ Departmeat Approval: Name Ron Mooree Title City Administrator Adaiinistrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administrator's Report llem Description: Adoption of the 2002 Collectible Tax Levy and Annual Budget - Resolutions Altacbments: 1. Resolution Adopting the Final 2001 Tax 107 Collec'iblc in 2002 2. Resolution to Adopt the 2002 General Fund Budget 3 Resolution to Adopt the 2002 Special Revenue Funds Budget The following is information regarding the City's 2002 budget and tax leN^. The 2002 budget reflects an efTort to address current operating nc^. to address new scr\ ice needs, and to continue current capital funding levels. The following is an explanation of key elements of the 2002 budget. GENERAL FUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES fhe proposed 2002 General Fund expenditures are $4,607,470. This is an increase of $317,030 or 7.39% over the 2001 budget. The increase in General Fund expenditures reflects the cost increases detailed below. COST INCREASES Several areas of costs have increased substantially for 2002. These are os follows: • Additional stafllng to meet service demands and operational needs • Pay and benefits adjustments. • Professional services. • Insurances. Additional Stalling 1. The budget includes the hiring of on additional Police OfTicer to meet increasing police serv ice needs and demands. 2. The budget includes the hiring of a part-time accounting staff person to free-up the Assistant laiMrmBO While the increase in workers ’ compensation and liability insurance costs are not large in relation to the total budget increase, the costs for these insurances have increased significantly. The workers ’ compensation insurance costs have increased due to two large claims in the police department. The liability insurance has increased due to several very expensive land use lawsuits that were defended by the city’s liability insurance carrier (League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust) in recent years. Other Eanriei The three main items causing the increase in other expenses are a $5,000 cost to provide high speed internet access througliout the city offices, an increase in the police radio expenditure from $15,000 to $23,000 to reflect the required replacement of the current police radios \\ ith 800 meg.'»hertz radios, and a $4,539 increase in the cih ’s share of the LMCD levy . REVENUK REDUCTIONS The City will experience substantial reductions in three main revenue sources in 2002. These arc state HACA aid, federal COPS grant revenue, and recycling grant revenue. As part of the state tax reform package, HACA aid was eliminated for all cities. For Orono, this results in a $309,630 reduction in HACA aid revenue. Ilie tax reform legislation does allow cities to replace the lost HACA aid with tax levy. This additional levy is included in the city’s levy limit. The proposed 2002 budget docs include a levy increase to replace the lost HACA aid. In the years 1999 and 2000, the city received a total of approximately $200,000 in COPS grants to enable the hiring of additional police officers and the provision of a full-time school liaison officer. The grant funds were to be us^ over a three-year period with the city providing full funding after the three-year grant period. For 2002, the amount of grant funds w ill be reduced from $72,900 to $37,500. This will be the lost year of the availability of the COPS grant funds. Since the time the curbside recycling program was initiated, the city has received an annual grant from the county to offset a portion of the recycling program costs. For the year 2002. the grant amount has been reduced from $14,860 to $6,720, a reduction of $8,140 or 54.8%. A summary’ of all General Fund revenues is attached. TAX LEVY The tax levy required to fund the proposed 2002 budget includes the $309,630 amount to offset the elimination of HACA aid. For comparison purposes, the proposed 2002 ta.x levy e.xcludinu the HACA replacement lev-y is $2,616,705. This is a $173,355 or 7.09% increase over the 2001 levy. The proposed tax levy including the HACA replacement levy is $2,926,335. This is a $482,985 or 19.77% increase over the 2001 levy. TAX CAPACITY AND TAX CAPACITY RATE. AINP IMPACT OF TAX LEVY ON PROPERTY OWNERS The 2001 legislature, as part of the lux reform package, substantially compressed property class ta.x rates. The tax rates for commercial/industriul property and for homes valued bet\«'een $ 100,000 and S500,000 were reduced significantly. The Ulx rate reductions will substantially reduce the city's tax capacity, which is the tax base across which the property tax IcNy is spread. TIk city's tax capacity is estimated to be $13,842,339. This is a reduction of S3.773.I58 or 21.42% from the 2001 lax capacity. The tax rate compression also shiAs the tax burden from commercial/industrial propert) and the mid-lo-upper value homes to lower valued homes. Due to the reduction in tax capacity, even with qs increase in txLX levy, the city's ta* opacity rale wrould increase from 13.7% to 17.44%. The proposed levy excluding the HACA replacement levy wrould result in a tax capacity rate of 18.71 %. The proposed levy including HACA replacement levy results in a tax capacity rate of 20.%%. It is important to keep in mind that, in terms of the impact on property taxes, the large increase in the tax capacity rate will be significantly offset by the reduction in Ulx capacity for those properties for which the property class uix rotes were substantially reduced. For comparison purposes, assuming no change in property value, the tax levy would result in the City's share of the property tax bill on a home valu^ at S100.000 increasing by SSI or 33%. For a home valued at $250,000. the City's shore of the property Uix bill would increase by $27 or 6%. For a home valued at $500,000, the City’s share of the property lax bill would be reduced by $ 15 or 1.4?o. SEWER AND WATER FEE INCREASES As called for by the City's plan for funding long-term repair and replacement of the City's w alcr and sewer infrastructure, the proposed budget reflects a 3.2% increo.se in water rates and a 2.8®.o increa.se in sew-er rates. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the following resolutions: 1. Resolution Adopting the Final 2001 Tax Levy Collectible in 2002 2. Resolution to Adopt the 2002 General Fund Budget 3. Resolution to Adopt the 2002 Special Revenue Funds Budget L A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL 2MI TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2602 BE nr RE5>OLVED, by Ihe City Council of the City of Orono. County of Hennepin. Minnesota, that the final 2001 Tax Lesy Collectible in 2002. is detennined to be as follows: GENERAL LEVY General Fund • Operations PIR Fund • Infrastructure • Roads Park Fund • Land Acquisition & Development Improvement & Fx)uipment Outlay Fund - Capital Equip TOTAL GENERAL LEVY $2.3*1.655 35.450 5.000 90.000 $2.512.105 SPECIAL LEVY General Fund • PERA Rate Increases General Fund - COPS Grant Decrease General Fund • Capital Equipment Cert. TOTAL SPECIAL LEVY-GENERAL FUND $ 4.830 35.400 50.000 $ 90.230 BONDED INDEBTEDNESS G.O. 1992 Sewer Improvement Bond G.O. 1997 Sewer Improvement Bond G.O. 1999 Sewer Improvement Bond TOTAL. BONDED INDEBTEDNESS S 45.000 15.000 14.000 $ 74.000 BONDS OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL UNITS H.R.A. Refunding Bond 1998 S 250.000 S 250.000 TOTAL ALL LEVIES S2.926J15 llie City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 10,2001. ATTEST. Linda S. Vee. City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, ^ta>or Tm cj A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2002 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Oruno, County of Hennepin. Minnesota that the 2002 General Fund budget is determined to be as follows: ESTIMATED RFVFNTJFS Taxes - General $2,471,885 Licenses and Permits 338.045 Intergovernmental 281.170 Charges for Services 1.281.870 Fines and Forfeits 111.500 Interest Income 100.000 Miscellaneous TOTAL $4,607,470 APPROPRIATED EXPENDITURHS General Government $ 972.570 Public Safety 2.564,870 Street Maintenance 564.150 Parks and Recreation 70.680 Recv'cling Program 83.050 Engineering - Unallocated 10.300 Reimbursable Expenditures 66.150 Special Projects and Contingent:)'55.000 Capitol Outlay 115.700 Transfers To Other Funds 105.000 OTAL $4,607,470 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 10,2001. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2M2 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS BUDGETS BE IT RESOLVED, by the Cit>’ Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin. Minnesota that the 2002 Special Revenue Fun^ budgets arc determined to be os follov^’s: Park Improve & Equip Outlav Community Investment Taxes • General $5.000 S 90.000 $ Interest Income 5.000 20.000 113.000 User Fees / Loon Payment 5,400 Park Dedication Fees 30,000 . • Transfers from other Funds . .105.000 123,000 Use of Fund Balance . .. . Total Revenues S220-KI0 Appropriated Expenditures General Government $. .$ 45.650 $ Public Safety .. Streets 37,000 • • Porks & Recreation 7.000 . « Transfers to other Funds 33.000 90.000 130.000 Increase to Fund Balance 47.750 106.000 Total Expenditures 40.000 U2SLm Adopted by the Cit>’ Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 10.2001. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk tPBCIALa fl Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor DEC 1 0 2001 Cii t wnmvo REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 5.2001 ITEM NO: f Q DcpsrtBcat Approval: Name Lin Vee ^ Tilk CityOefk™ AdmiBbtrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City AdminKtralor's Rqxxt Hem DeacripHon: Proposed 2002 Fee Sc Attachment:A. B. Summary Ordinance Proposed 2002 Fee Schedule Ordinance The proposed 2002 Fee Schedule Ordinance and Summary reflecting the proposed changes are attached. The proposed changes include: Increase in Subdivision and Park Dedication Tees related to Zoning Applications, increase in Inspection Charge for Contractual Inspection Scrv ice (i.c. Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park). Addition of charge for Canoe Rack Rental for slips at Summit Beach. Increase In Garbage Hauler License fee. Increase in Solicitation and Transient Merchant 1.iccn.se fees. Various increases to Liquor Licenses and Investigation fees. Addition of fees for Liquor Violations. The violation fees and penalties would become cfTective after criminal proceedings are concluded. The Council ma>- decide to schedule an administrative hearing to stress the seriousness with which the Cit>- considers any violation of the liquor ordinances; or if the licensee contests the facts of the alleged violation and'or the violation penalty, the matter will be scheduled for a hearing before the Council. Increase in fee for Firearms Permit to Carry. Addition of charge for Firearms Permit to Acquire. Increase in fees for Large Assembly and Parades & Special Events permits. Addition of charge for Accident Photos. 2.8”/'o increase in sewer rates and 3.2% increase in water rates. Increase of 4.2“o in all sanitary' sewer and water connection charges. Increase to various golf course charges. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt the attached ordinance adopting the City’s Fee Schedule for 2002 and Summary Ordinance for publication. ORDINANCE NUMBER 212 . SECOND SERIES SUMMARY APPROVED The Council hereby determines that the text of the summary of this ordinance marked "Official Summary of Ordinance Number 212 . Second Series," and a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The Council further determines tluit the publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 212 . SECOND SERIES ORDINANCE NO. 212 . SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2M2 FEE SCHEDULE AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 200. SECOND SERIES The follo^^ ing is the ofTicial summar>’ of Ordinance Number 212 . Second Series approved by the Cit>' Council of the City of Qrono on December 10.2001. The following sections have changes, additions and/or deletions: DESCRIPTION 2001 FEE 2002 FEE CQD£ SEC. ZONING APPLICATIONS SabdivWM 11.10. SubdiviskM Application Subd 17 (Clast 1A II Subds. Lot Line (AK9) Rearrangement) Final Plat Review (Class III)> Special Legal S25Q.00 ^ Special Legal Engineering Charges Engineering Charges Filing Fees: a) Subdivision only Sieo.eo SUMS 11.10. b) Subdivisions > Easements &S220.00 Minimum plus any Subd 17 Covenants additional costs additional costs (AKII) Park Dedkatioo Fees 1 The City has established by The City has established by Resol. No. Cash Contribution in Lieu of Land resolution a minimum residential resolution a minimum residential 45S8 park fee of S3.I00 per dwelling park fee of $3J50 per dwelling unit and a maximum of $5,300 unit and a maximum of SS.550 (12-lt-OO) per dwelling unit.per dwelling unit. Cash Contribution in Lieu of Land The City has esublished by The City has established by Resol. No. resolution a minimum resolution a minimum 4589 commercial/industrial park fee of commerdaLindustrial park fee of (12-18-OOt $?.750 per acre and a maximum SS.I25 oer acre and a maximum of$»:350 per acre.ofJlii25peracre. 5 L DESCRirriON 2WIFEE 2M2FE1C £sm SEC CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES Coatractaai laspcctioB Service Inspection Charge $28 00 per inapeciion S2S.00 ner inowftinn UCCNSCS A MISCELLANEOUS CHARGE5 Ca»o€ Rack Itoatal Garkflgt Haaltr Uccmc • flat rate loaiag Dapartacat Docaaicato Comprehensive Guide PUn • I9t0 (with ameadmcats) SSOOO mama man Delete > replaced bv 2000-2020 Gcaeval Adailalstrative Uceasea/Flact Solicitation License Uptp lOiplicH pryll OOeaeh add itional solic itor in Owiw. Applica nt must hst only petions tha t SIOO.OO plus actual cosu up lo SI.SOO Sec. 5M willaoKcitin Ow Tnuisient Merchant mm Gcacral AdnlalsIraUt ' Docnaicala Fax Charge SIOO.OO plus actual cosu up lo $1,300 Sec. 5 30 S.23 per oaee L • -f.*irW-a-Vir |^£^mPTION 2CILEEE musjL COPE SE£L PoHct DcparlaMat Adaiiabtercd Deer. Wine A LiqtMn Inilbl Investigilion On-Sale Liquor/Off-Sak LiquorOifisa On ?;.kO 2 Rc«r Off-S.WWifie On-Sak Liquor Lkense On-Sak Wine Lkense 3.2 Beer OfTSak (Annual) 3.2 Beer On Sak (Annual) Club Liquor Lkense (weekday) Temporary Set-up Permit (one day) Temporary Beer Permit (one day) Liquor Violatiom 1‘Violatioo SLOOO.OO Resol. $5,000.00 1306 Sec. 4.30 Sec. 4.40 Sec. 4.20 Sec. 4.20 A <A o ivM nn 9 ' J.W S50.00 $100.00 KQQ.QQ $50.00/each o€C, Sec. 4.21 ^ A M ______a>$50.00-'each $300.00 2*^ Violatim 3*^ Violation 4*^ Violation Firearms Permit to Carry S50.00 Sec. 5.25 J25W Sec 6.01 l^e Aisemblv Permit (over 300 neoole)<wnJf.TV.W $200.00 » $60.00 each aiMItinnal dav: actual costs un to $1,500.00 Parades A Special Evenu $50 00 $50 00 or $200.00 if over 200 oeoole: actual costs uo to SI.500.00 Copy Service $5:09 SSOOHrst naee ^ $25 each Copy of Accident Reports Accident Photos “No Parkinf Order of Polke** paper signs (no lath included)Cl fVlMrk^v.«rv va^ii SEWER PROJECTS RyDMrkt-Project 1963 ST'IA. LS-IA, ST-IB. LS-IB l964LS-IAorLS-IB I96S LS-I 1965 LS-IA 1967 LS-I 1969 LS-I Shore Hills 1969 LS-2 Chevy Chase 1970 LS-I Saga Hill 1971 LS-I Dunwoody 1973-1 I9S0-I Minnetonka Bluffs 1980-1 West Fenidale/Count) Road IS 1980-1 Orono Lane 1980-1 County Road IS/Marinas 1980- 2 Nofth Shore Drive/Scotch Pine Ln 1981- 1 North Shore Drive'Highwood 1982- IA Navane Utilnks 1982- IB Nawre Utilities Northern Ave 1985-1 Ciysttl Bay 1983- 1 Highway 12 Orono-Long l^e-Mcdina 1989 Highway 12 1992 Stubbs Bay Sewer I Stubbs Bay NL.. W-Baysidc Hast II Bederwood III Bayside North IV Oxford V Cygnet and Leaf 19^7 Sewer 97-1 North L.LA.L.C.C. 97-2 Bracketts Point 97-3 Bay Ridge 1998-1999 Sewer 1998 Shoreline/Neritage 99-1 Orono Orchard 99-2 Edgewood Hills 2000 Sewer 2000-1 Webber Hills 2002-2 Fox Ridge 2000-3 East Long Lake Lift Clints 2001 2002 S5.4 2500 t».4 3 5.00 S5.4 25.e0 S5.4 25.00 S5.4 25.00 St3;46 0.00 S9:44»:0e S9.445 .00 S9;445 0e Sf3.46 e.oe sa-7.f40 .00 S2t.7t5.QQ S9.IOOOO «7^f40 .0e SI3.97500 sa.97ooe Sf4 .ijo.eo Sf5-.-905 0Q S24 .625.00 S20.H5000 S29:4 30.0e S23.7 85 .00 S20.720 00 S34.49000 Sf9.4l5 00 Sf 7.400 00 S>2.925 00 S29.I3 5Q0 S7.555 00 Si6:6 ?000 SI3J3 5.00 SS.650 00 S5.650.00 S5.650.00 S5.650 00 S5.650.00 iiM2m 19.840 00 S9.840.00 59.840 00 S 14.025.00 SI2.I7500 S28J80 00 i2imsn S9.480.00 S28J80.00 SI 4.560.00 S3.095 00 SI4.725 00 SI.440 00 SI6.570 00 S25.660 00 S21.725 00 530.665.00 524.785.00 S21.590 00 S35.940 00 SI9.I90.00 SI 8.130 00 S23.890 00 S30.360.00 S7.870.00 SI 7.370.00 SI3.790.00 ler Afr»rw CredR to Area (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) Trunk Area S»aaO:O0 S1270 00 S3raa»0 0 S3.3SS 00 Per Acre (I) (I) S5rf05 S5.320 00 acre (|) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (6) (6) (6) (7) (7) (7) Excludes Grinder Allowance Excludes Grinder Allowance Excludes Grinder Allowance (I) (I) (8) (8) (8) SEWER PROJECTS (CONTINUEO) 1904 Forcemato mid UR Slathm W1 Existing Properties/Increase New BUtgs Replacing Existing Bldgs New Residential w/Existing Stub New Residential without Stub Freshwater Biological (Incl. “Marsh at Lalbyette” Lots) HIV Pan ^ RTForcemaia Credit to Area §540:0et5fiiflQ (4) 5540«eS5filfiQ (4) §490.00t2> S5l0 00tn 5I.565.00SI.630.00 <4> mandr4t §49O 00«2tS5IQ O0m S6t04MS635 00 t4t muidt4t 1909 Gravity Um aad UR Stathm (see map for affected areas) Fixed Charae> RIO Rv Pan Credit to Area WATER PROJECTS By Dislrtct • Project 1967 LW.| Highway l2>'Crystal Bay Ro«l 1969 LW-2 Chevy chase 1970 LW.| Navvre Reskkndal 1970 LW.| Navarre Commercial I9t2-IA Navarro I9S9 Highway 12 1999 Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation UiiLCtoni^Area/Acrcaae Froat Fool cut Cfei Credit to Area 94:590:60 SlZ&ifiQ 54:590:00 S4.7I5.00 «:395:Oe S2J70.00 55:4t»00 S3J60.(l0 »a^»a5:W S2J25.00 534-i6Jil4fl 554^SlLfifl 55?»e0 S390.00 §0 .440.00 58.795 00 acre n-rrV ff fwr aFr*» DESCRIPTION 2001 FEE 2002 FEE CQI2& SEC. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELI^NEOUS CHARGES MUNICIPAL SEWER RATES by unit: 1st SM M per quarter SKLil per quarter 2nd $76:30 per quarter iZLlfi per quarter by flow:$-3-7$ 1000 eaJkm plus S 3 24/1000 gallon plus S-7-75 per quarter per UJi per quarter per connection conneaion MUNICH'AL WATER RATES Navarre Area Billing A Ready to Serve Chg S ^^qtr S 24,70 Qtr Water l>soge Rate s-?:e3;iooo gal s 2,9W|OOOgaI Unconnected l*ropeity Chg $-25r05/qlr S 24 70/atr Highway 12 Area Billing A Ready to Sene Chg $-0^'qtr S 7.00 Qtr Water Usage Rate $-3-07/1000 gal $2,99 1000 gal Chevy Chase Area Billing A Ready to Sene Chg S-d:75‘qtr i±Q0'qtr Water Usage Rate $-37i6/ |(X)0 gal (no change)S2.l0'i000 gal (nochange) Bulk sale to Minnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge $33:26'qtr billing charge plus $24,70 qtr billing charge plui Area $i $7 1000 gallon total flow at $2.09 1000 gallon total flow at border meter.border meter. GOLF COURSE CHARGES • Effective diMc 2M2 Scmni Monday tlmi Friday (ewiudii« HolUnya BcgRi Play Before I2K» Noon 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes After 12:00 Noon and Weekend Rates 1st Nine Moles 2nd Nine Holes 2“* Nine Holes (Weekday After 12:00 Noon) 2001 Fee 2002 Fee »-».00 i.9JS S-6.00 $ 6.23 $ M 00 i 11.23 $-0.00 S 8.30 $-6.00 i 6JS League Rales Monday thru Friday S-^.OO S 9,50 Senior CitUen (Over 60 years old) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon • Weekdays 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes____________________ Senson TVket (Senior Citizens Only) S-6.€0 $-6.00 $150.00 Lj 6JS i 6.2i SI60.00 FALL RATES WH ht||n the third Moaday nf Septoaher 29fii as Weekend Rates: 1st Nine 1. 9.23 7nn Nine $-6:60 Ridii«Cart S 8.00/nine $ 8 00/nine Weekday Rmes: 1st Nine $ 7.30 $ 7.30 2nd Nine $ 4.00 $ 4.00 Sr. & Jr.S 4.00 $ 4.00 Riding Cart S 6.00/nine S 6.00/nine GOLF CART RENTAL Motorised: lit Nine Holes (A.ier 12:00 R Weekeodi) 2nd Nine Holes Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon lit Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes fvM Cnrts - Per Roond GoircMa-PkrRooad LiLflQ $HM6 1 m $-6:00 s.y.oQ $■8.00 S. .7.,QQ S 2.30 $ 2.30 S 3.00 $ 3.00 STUDEPrr RATE (AGES 12 • IT) Begin PUy Before Noon Monday - Friday. Excluding Holidays 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes S-fr.OO S-6.00 A printed copy of ihc 2002 Fee Schedule Ordinance is available for inspection by any person at the office of the City Cle^ during regular ofTicc hours. This ordinance becomes effective the \scck of January 1,2002. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this lOth day of December, 2001, by a vote of. __nays. ayes ATTEST: Lindas. Vee.City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor ORDINANCE Na 212 . SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2M2 FEE SCHEDULE AND AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 200, SECOND SERIES TRc CHy Coaacil of Ibc City of Orono ordahit: SECTION I. OrdiMucri Repealed. Onlinaacc No. 200, Sccood Serk*, entitled 2001 Fee Schedule is hereby repealed. The City Council of Orono per Sectioa 1.05 of the Municipal Code hereby ordaini the followinc effecthc during the calendar year 2002: SECTION 2. Fees. ZONING APPLICATIONS All fees are apolicailou fees and arc non-rcfundable after tlaff work !im begun on the applkntion. AppUcation Tvne VARIANCE (Flexible applications invoking more than one variance will require an addMioanI S50.00 payment per each variance) Variance for NoinCooforming Structures RENEWAL VARIANCE (No change from original appllcallon) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (One charge per prujccl) Residential Accessory Use (Animab, etc.) Institutional Use (.School, Church, etc.) Duplet Credit (per building) Guest Housc/Gucst Apartment Commcrcial/Industrial Use Non-Cnnforming Use Amendment £ff S250.00 S250.00 SI 50.00 $175.00 $250.00 $200.00 S225.00 $325.00 $250.00 sioaoo Applicable CoikSecthm 10.06, Subd 3(D) 10.06, Sabd 3(D) ia09,Subd3 20t:Ftt Schedule-Panel ZONING APPLICATIONS fCONT.I Aanlkall— Tvik CONDITIONAL USE PERSIIT Cmlis«c«! (0«c Charfc per Project) Laad AlleraliM: GiWiag. Miag. etc. (over 566 caMc yardi) Sea waMs, rctaiaki| walb withia O-TS* bkaaorc PRD AppHcathM wMi SabdKMoa PUP Applkalloa wllkoal SabdivisJoo PIDAppllcatloai Renewal Coadilieaal Um Pcrmil (no chanKc froai origiaal applicatioa) CoadRioaal Uac PenaR wilk Variaace ARcr-tke-Faet Fees COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBDIVISION Skeick Plan (Clau I. II. A III) SubdivisioB Application (Class I A II SabdlvisUint. Subdivision of a 1^1 Line Rearrangement) Prelirainary Review (Clau 111 and all non-rcsidential) Final Plat Review (Ctess III) Filing Fees: a) Sabdh ision only b) SubdWitioo ♦ F^temenls A Coveaaats Renewal ofSabdivisioo Application (Clau IA II, Sabdivteion ola Lot Uae Rearrangement) Applieabk CfliIt&ttiW 10.66, SakdJ S256.l64^penBH .SabdKbioa Fee pins S3S.00 per dwelling unit $40.00 per dwelling anil (rainiraum $150.00) $175.00 per acre (minimum SJ50.00) $150.00 Add $ 75.00 for each varlaacc Doable AppHcalioa Fee Ret. «I366 A »l J66 $275.06 ^ Coasakaat Fee $275.00 $375.00 11.10, Subd 7(A) 11.10, Sabd 10(A) (B) $400.00 * $30.00/lot ($440a loU; $460/3 lots; $520/4 lots, etc.) 11.10, Sabd M(C) $250.00 * Special Lcg»l/Eagiaecriag Charges 11.10, Sabd 17(A)(6) $110.00 11.10, Sabd 17(A) (II) $220.00 Miaimam pins any additional cosb $200.00 2002Fee ScheJulc-Pagg 2 ZONING APPLICATIOWS <CONT.^ SUMtaVISION ComOtmtd RcMwal or PrriinlMry SulidiviifaMi Applkalioa (CUu 111) (No ckaofc rroM osteal appUcalkm) Rracwal of Kiaal Sabdivbioa AppUcalioo (No chaagc from orif Inal appNcatioa) PUBLIC ROAD VACATION EASEMENT VACATIONS WITH SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS EASEMENT VACATIONS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS ZONING AMENDMENTS INCLUDING REZONING PUD Rezoalni • Allowrd oaly wUhia area adjacrnl to lllghway 12 as doflacd in Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 PUD Rezoaing: Residential Com mercial/l adusirial AppHcaMc CoiaStethw S2M.M SISO.OO S 75.00 per beneHtting Section 10.11 property (SJ00.00 miaimam per application) SlOt.00 S200.00 Scctioo 10.11 Section 10.11 SJ50.00 Section 10.11 Ord. 74,2nd Serkt Section I0.SJ S37S.U0 V S40.00 per dwelling vnit $175.00 per ncro (min. $350.00} $375.00 Section 10.11 2002F«€ ScheJute-Page 3 ZOr^lNG APPLICATIONSJCONT.) Tvffr SPEaAL IMPROVEMENTS NoAHTfiiMlabk ckargcs for City Eagiiwcr‘i review for apfiMcatiofi* aad 4niga drawlaf, focladiag coMtmctkNi intpreliM feea. If iaiprovcawau arc propoMd as pan of a SabdhriskMi. Review Ckaries are payable with Preliniaary Plat applkatioa. Proposed Private Roads Proposed Public Roads Request for City to accept eibtlag private road Request for City to aiaiataia uaimproved public road Proposed Saaitary Sewer Mala Etieasioa Profiosed WateraiaiB EsteasioB Propoaed Stomi Sewer System (escludiag cuh eHs) Ou-^ite Systeui • Site Evalualioa Review (applicable to mrat sabdivisioo appilealioas) RIP-RAP Staff Review (aoraial rip-rap) Uaasaal Rip-Rap: a) New iastallalioa b) Repair previously approved APPEAL OP ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND APPLICATIONS Alinlmum Project Valuation: S250.000.00 Application Fee: AppIcaMe CudeSeetiau Secti0BlLI2,Sabd4 SASaoO plus SOf/lineal fool 5950.00 phis S<W/llneal loot 5050.00 5225.00 5275.00 plus S25j OO per stub 5275.00 plus $25.00 per stub 5250.00 S 60.00 per aew lot praposed for on-sHe No Cbarge (MOVD Perait Required) $100.00 > CUP rev iew Stafrpenait-SI00.00 $100.10 ScctioB 10.65, Sabd 3(1^ 0.1% of project valuation ($250.00 minimum) plus $5,000.00 deposit for legal/ administrative espeases 2002F<t SchtJtde-Page 4 ZONINC; AfPUCATIONSKONT.t Appli|C»<ioi> Type Applicable Code Scettoa SiliRCIlARGF. FOR STAFF FXPKNSF IN FXC'KSS OF APPl.K ATIO.N FKES Per Fee firhedalc wl forth bekm: Profeuioaal Time Clerical Tlaie Lctal/EngiBccring CunsullanU Mileage/Copirt/PoilRKr/Flr. Scctioo 10.11 S!(0.(MVIioar $ J4l.00/hour Actual Billed Cott Actual Co<t AFTER-TIIF-FACT AITLICATION IN\ KSTKiATION FEES (Rciolution I3U6) (Applies to all application types inrludins variances, conditional use permits, vubdivtsion, zoniae amendments, rip*rap permits, special improvement reviews, eradini; permits, moving permits, business licenses, kennel licenses, all building permits and all general permits.) Tbb permit fee may be waived by staff for resident property owners who have not involved a contractor in their work, have no previous history of work without a permit and where such work does not entail any roning viobtions. Whenever any work, use or division of bad for which a formal application is required has been eummenerd without first makbg such appHeatkin and receiving City approval therefore, a speebi investigatbn of the eireumstances shall be made during th.> applicatioa process. Because of the estra administrative costs involved in the specbl tavestigation, the mmimum appUcation fee for afler-the-fact applkatkms shall be twice the fee set forth in the basic fee schedule, whether or not the application is thereafter approved or denir J. Pay meat of an after-the-fact applkatkin fee shall not constitute approval or authorizatioa of the work, use, or div ision of land, and shall nut cunslitute a penalty or a waiver of the right of the City tu institute civil or criminal legal actions against the applicant for commencing such work, use or divbion of bnd without the required prior approval of the City . After-the-fact Investigatbn Fee Amount:Equal to and In addiibn to the basic fee amount (total fee is twice the bask fee amount).Res. IJ06 2002Fce SchcJulc-Pat^t 5 L— ZONINGAPPLICATfONS (COW.) Applicable Code Sectioa PARK DEDICATION FEES I Maakipal Code ScclkM 11.62 Land Dcdicalion MiHimam Area • SubdiviUers ihall be required to dedicate to the City for parks, playgrouads, trails, opca spaces and other public purposes as a minimum that pcrcenlage of gross land area, or other such amount as may be determined by the City Council, as set forth below: (I) Rcsidential/Agricullurat/Multiple Residential Zoned Ijind. Dedication requirement of ll% of the land being platted or subdisided. (Esclusive of lot that includes an eshting residence.) Commcrcial/Industrial Zoned Land. Dedkaled requiremeol of i% of the land being platted or subdisided. Cash Coalrlbution in Lieu of Lands. In those instances where a cash contribution b to be made by the subdhider, in Ueu of a conveyance or dedication of land, tbc cash coolribulion to be contributed shall be equivalent to the fair market value of the equivalent undeveloped land that would otherwise have been conveyed or dedicated. The City shall account for such funds in a special fund named Park Dedication Funds. The City Council has estahibbed by resolution a minimum residential park fee of S3450 per dwelling unit and a matimum of SS4S0 per dwelling unit The City Council has established by resolution a minimum commercial/lndustrial park fee of SS,I25 per acre and a masimum of SI Jdl75 per acre. Res. 4588(l2-ISdl0) Res. 4589(I2-1S4I0) 2002Fee Schedule-Page 6 rONSTWUCTION PERMFTS AND INSPECTION FEES Ptfi^ TV^ •UtLOING PERMIT Ord.2U Mtmtmmm Fee Nonul Fee Phin Review Fee: Conaerclil RetMealial B«ildie| VelHitioe Stenaerd S2JJ0 (per 1997 (IBC/SBC SUedard Schedale) (per 1997 UBC/SBC Slaadard Schedale) orBalMlafPeraiilFee (perCarreal I.C.B.O. Balldiag Slaadards/Baildiag Valuaiioa Data) ZONING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WITHOUT BUILDING PERMIT (chaage la aae) S 90.00 RETAINING WALLS (la ciceu 0(42'* abo aiattlple Hered walk that eicced 42" aad aal lacalcd la bheshore protected area) NOTE: Retaialag waJb la 0-75* lahcthore protected nae • ace Cood. Uic Penalt ecctloa of fee tchcdale. S2J.90 ailaiaioai (per 1997 UBC/SBC Staadard Schedale) TREE REMOVAL WITHIN 0-75'SJ0.B0 OnL Iti22 Sabd 3 DOCKS • RESIDENTIAL IPerataaent (CUP Reqaired) aad laltlal .Seaiooall SJO.OO DOCKS • COMMERCIAL Per 1997 UBC/SBC SUadard Schedale DEMOLITION PERMIT Piiaclpal Sirveture Ord.216 AcceMory Stractare S 90.00 Initial inipecthm S 29.00 for each reqaeited or reqaired iaipectioa beyond Initial ioapecthio S 30i00 laMal laapecthNi 2002FeeScheMe-Page 7 C'ONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTKIN FEES (CONT.) Type PLUMBING PERMIT Mail-ia poflagc A luiMlIhig charfc MECHANICAL PERMIT Minimum Fee for any Mechanical Permit MaiHn pwtage A handling charge Reiidential. Single Family A Dunlei hv Unit Tvna Umicr Ground Tank Removal ComamfetoL ludHrial A MuHj-Famitv Rarideutial bv Uail Tvne MUNICIPAL CONNECTION PERMIT (together with area cooaectioo charges) Sewer Water S/l** (3/4”i7K”) mHer including tales tas 3/4" (3/4"s9") meter including sales tai 1" meter including sales Us larger meter Mail-in postage A handling charge (sewer and water permits only) CodeSeetUu 1.25% of cooirnct priee or S 3Ltt minimum per project S IJO 1.25% of coniract price or S 35.00 minimum per project S L50 Per mechanical permit fees 5 35.00 miahaumlMor 1.25% of contract prkc 535.00 535.00 5130.00 5110.00 5260.00 quote hasis S 1.50 2002Fee Sched^t-Page i ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MUNICIPAL WATER C ONNECTION CHARGES (If Ml pmioMly Mwswd or if •• iiopro«e»c«l proicct it MldccMd to be required to llM tolr dbcrctioo of tbe CMy. If ■■ improvewenl it rcqoirrd. Hie rooocctio.i ebarfe nay be to addMtoa to aay aateMtocat) Tbe CMMCtiM ebarce for propeHiet wbbio| lo coanect to Ibe tewer or water bat wbicb are located oaltide tbe delioeatcd boaadarirt of tbe affected project area iball be ebar^ tbe coaacctloa fee for that area. Such coaacclioat arc tabject lo City CoaacU approval SEWER PROJECTS By District - Project Unit Charise Area Or Acreage Charge Credit To Area l%3 ST-IA, LS-IA, ST-IB, LS-IB S3.650.00 (1) 1964LS-lAorLS-IB S5.650.00 (I) 1965 LS-1 S5.650.00 (1) 1965 US-IA S5.650.00 (1) 1967 LS-1 $5,650.00 (1) 1969 US-1 Shore HiHs S14.025.00 (1) 1969 LS-2 Chevy Chase S9340.00 (1) 1970 US-1 Saea Hill $9440.00 (1) 1971 LS»1 Daawoody $944040 (1) 1973-1 S14.025.00 m CREDIT TO AREA: (I) 602-37691 Sewer Operatiac (4) 406-37691 MR Fuad 17 LS A Forcciaaia (5) 300-37691 1992 Improve Stubba Bay (6) 311-37691 1997 liaproveaKtils (7) 313-37691 1990-1999 Sewer Improvenieiitf ii) 314-37691 2000 Sewer Improvcmcala 2002Fet Schedule-Page 9 ALL SANITARY SLWLK AND MUNICIPAL WATPJICUNNLCTION CHARGES (If Ml prcviowly ancd or R m taprmmciil pn^cct b aot dtcwcd to be rtfM ia the Mle dhrrrtkM of Ihc CMy. if an hnprovcHMnt b rr«|Mirrd, the canntrtkm charge na^ be in adililian to any usciuncnt.) The coancclion charge lor pmpenkt wbhiag to connect to the fcncr or water but which are located outside tbc deUneated boundarki of the alTccIcd pn^ vca dni be chMied the connection fee fur that area. Such roanectioas are subject to Chy Council approvat SEWER PROJECTS 1980-1 Miiihctonka Bluffs $12,175.00 (1) 1980-1 West Fcrndalc/County Road IS $28,280.00 (1) 1980-1 Orono Lane $22,630.00 (1) 1980-1 County Road IS/Marinas $ 9,480.00 (1) 1980-2 North Shore Drive/Scotch Pine Lane $28,280.00 (1) 1981-1 North Shore Drive/lfithwood $14,560.00 (1) 1982-1 A Navarre Utilities $ 3,095.00 Trunk Area $1,270.00 (1) 1982-1 B Navarre Utilities Northern Avenue $505.00 (truuk uuit acrc/uaM) $3355.00 Per Acre (1) 1985-1 Crystal Bav $14,725.00 (1) CREDIT TO AREA: (1) M2-J7h9l Sewer Operating (4) 40h.37tf i PIR Fund JT7 LS 4 Forcen (5) 308-37(91 1992 Improve Stubbs Bay (() 311-37691 1997 Improvements (7) 313-37(91 1998-1999 Sewer Improvements (» 314-37(91 2000 Sewer Improvements 2002 Fee ScheMe-Page 10 ALL SANITARY S£WER AND MUNICIPAL WATIJl C0NNLCT10N CHARGES (If Ml prvrtoMly hi IlK Mk rflKretlM of the Cky. If ItyrmfiM k required, the rwrrtioB charte any be ia or IT aa haproeeawh prakct k aal loberrqalrii The ctaMwctioa charfc for propertke wkhiat to cpaaert to the arwer or water hat which are lacalcd he charted the ceaafrtioa fee for that area. Such coaaertiow arc Mbjcct to Chy CoaacM appnnral. or the affected prqieet M M 1983-1 Highway 12 Orono-Loag Lake- Medina S 1,446.00 (1) 1989 Highway 12 $5320/aci'e (1) 1992 Stubbs Bay Sewer 1 Stubbs Bay NE/NW - Bayside East $16370.00 (5) II Bederwood $25360.00 (5) HI Bayside North $21,725.00 (5) IV Oiferd $30365.00 (5) V Cygnet and Leaf $24,785.00 (5) CREDIT TO AREA; (I) 602-37«9l Sewer Operatiag (4) 404-37491 PIR Faad #7 LS R Forcraiaia (5) 30S-3749I 1992 Itaproec SlalilM Bay (4) 311*37491 1997 Improecoieats (7) 313*37491 199B-1999 Sewer laiprovcmciiU (I) 314*37491 2000 Scwa* baproraaeali 2002Fet Schedule-Past 11 ALL SANITARY SKWER AND MUNICIPAL WATER CONNIX'TION CHARGES (If uol pmlcuOy amtatd or if m tapnircmeal pn^ k nol drancd to be rtqdrcd la Ike wk dhcrHkM at the City. H m iMpruvroKat b required. Ike coaacetioa ckartc any be ia addhioa to aay aaraaira! ] Ike tjamtdkm charie for properties whhiac to coaacct to Ike «e«rr or aalcr bal ahkfc arc located oaliide the deliarated koaadarks of the affected pn^ area dnl be diarged the coaacctioa fee for that area. Sack coaafctioae are sabjcct to City Coaaci appraval. 1997 SEWER 97-1 North L.L7L.L.C.C $21,590.00 (6) 97-2 Brackclti Point $35,940.00 (6) 97-3 Bay Ridge $19,190.00 (6) 1998-1999 SEWER 1998 Shordine/Hcritaxc Sewer $18,130.00 (7) 99-1 OroM Orchard Sew er $23,890.00 (7) 99-2 Edgewood llilb Sewer $30360.00 (7) 2fNM> SEWER 2000-1 Webber llilb $7370.00 Excludes Crinder Allowance (8) 2000-2 Fox Ridge $17370.00 Excludes (Irindcr Allowance (8) 2000-3 East Long Lake $13,790.00 Excludes Grinder Allowance (8) CREDIT Tf) AREA: (I) M2-J7MI Sewer Operatlaie (4) 404.37491 PIR Fkad E7 LS Jk Forccankt (5) 3I8-3749I 1992 laiprovc Slabbs Bay (4) 311*37491 1997 haproveawets (7) 313*37491 1990*1999 Sewer laiprorcaMats (I) 314*37491 2II0 Sewer laipnncatoaU 2002Fet Schedule-Page 12 ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MLNIUPAL W ATEK CONNECTION CTlAKliES (If mil prctiowly «»nMd or if aa inprotracot pn^rct b mA dccmcil to be required hi the Mitr dberethm of the Chy. If an imprmnaenl h required, the ronnccthm charge may be in addhhm to any aurwunl.) The connection chaixc for propetlk* nbhhqt to connecl to the Mmcr or water bul which are located ouldde the drlinealed boundaries of the alTccted pn^ect area shall he rhnrfrd the connectloo fee for that area. .Such ronnectlnm are subject to Cky Council approval. 1984 Forcemain and Lift Slalion 117 upRradr: (An additional fee is charRcd for propctiici bencriitinK from the 19X4 forcemain and lift slalion HI upgrade, as follows, see map for affected areas): All Charges Are Per Unit * 86 By Pass +87 Forcemain C'retlit To Area F.iisting Properties/Increase $ 565.00 (4) New Bklgs Replacing Esisting Bldgs (If usage increases from esisting) $565.00 (4) New Residential w/Kiuting Stub $1,650.00 (4) New Residential without Stub $510.00(1)$1,650.00(4)(l)and (4) Freshwater Biological (IncL "Marsh at Lafayette' Lots) $510.00(1)$ 655.00 (4) Per unit on connection (previously assessed $2,000/aciY) (l)and (4) 1989 Gravity Line and Lift Station AlU By Pass: An additional fee is charged for properties benefitting from the 1989 gravity- line and lift station UlO by-pass per Resolution 82671: Filed Charge +810 By Pass Credit To Area (see map for affected areas)$ 225.00 $24165.00 (1) CREDIT TO AREA: (I) 602-37«9l Sewer Operatina (4) 406-37491 PIR Fund #7 I.S A Forcemain 15) 300-37491 1992 Improve Stubbs Bay (4) 311-37491 1997 Improvements (7) 313-37491 1990-1999 Sewer Improvements (f) 314-37491 2000 Sewer Improvements 2002F,v.^hnMe-raxe 13 L ALL SANITARY SF.WER AND MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES (If nul prc%i<iu\l) ■\ie«\c4l or if an im|irovrincnl prujccl is not dccmctl to be r«|uircd In the sole discretion of the City. If an improvement K required, the connection charge may be in addition to any assessment.) The connection charge for properties wishing to connect to the sewer or water bnt which are located outside the delineated lioundaries of the nfrcctcd project area shall be charged the coanectioa fee for the am. Such connections are subject to City Council approval WATER PROJFXTS By District - Project Unit Charge -f Area Or Acreage Charge + Front Foot C'harge Credit To Area 1967 LW.| Highway 12/Crystal Bay Road S 4.785.00 S 35.60 (1) 1969 LW-2 Chevy Chase $ 4,785.00 (1) 1970 LW-1 Navarre Residential S 2,370.00 $ 23.60 (1) 1970 LW-1 Navarre Commercial $ 3360.00 S 35.60 (1) 1982-1A Navarro S 2325.00 (1) 1989Higliway 12 S8,795/aere (1) 1999 Navarre Water Treatment Pbnt Rehabilitation* $ 390.00 (M * 1999 Navarre Water Treatment Tlant Rehabilitation Connection Charge • All propertiei within the Navarre Municipal Water Diitriet (the area ser> ed with municipal water serv ice via the Navarre Water Treatment Plant) which were cither not assessed or not fully assessed via special assessment for the 1999 Navarre Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation Pro]ecl shall pay a connection cbarRc ofS37S,00 per unit upon connection to the municipal water system. Such chaine shall be collected at the lime a buildins permit is issued for new construction* or at the time a connection permit is issued for existing structures. CREDIT TO AREA; (1)601.37391 Water Operating :002Fer Schi-ihilf-raise N SEWER AND WATER LTNIT APJtlSTMENT CHARGES CHARGES C1uiq{ct fluH rcsvh froai cHbcr iatcMlflcAlkNi «r as cibRag MBHrcsidailbl iim or a acw ■oa-midratial use that replaces a fonaer asc ta a praperty located whliia aa area already assessed aad served aiaaicipal sewer aad water. CREDIT Credit for previously assessed sewer or water units shall be applied against the total number of sewer and water units establisbcd for the new use. UNIT CHARGE Each sewer and each water unit adjustment charge shall be equal to the current Sers ice Availability Charge established by the Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services or its successor and shall be payable to the City of Orono upon application for a building permit 2002Fee St. htMg -Paitt IS MITSAf »ECnON FTF-S P»n»HTvDc ON-SITE SYSTEMS Oesiga Review Fees SabdhriikNi SHe Evalaatioa Report Review Rctidcaliai Sysieai Penail: Repair cibl>iiK tytleai New/Replarciaeat Sjnteia Noa-Rctidcntial System Permit: New or Total replacement Partial replaceaical Aaaaal Service Charge GRADING, EXCAVATION, FILUNG 500 cnbic yards or less 501 * caMc yards Appikabic Code Sectioa Ord.210 ladwdcd wHb permit lees S M.OO^prr new lot $50.00 $100.00 ♦ $20.00 per each inipectioa over J (Incladcs oulbousc oa Big Islaad) $100.00 ^ $20.00 per each iaspectioa over J $ 00.00 * $20.00 per each iaspectioa over J $ 50.00/system/>ear pins aa addilhmal $10.00 fee for late penalty pins 0% interest for nnpaid ebarget ccrtined S 50.00 (slair permit) ♦ actna) engineering fees if rcqnired ($100.00 if engiaccring fee necessary) S 25.00 per each inspection over 1st S 50.00 * Conditional Use Permit ($100.00 if engineering fee necessary) $25.00 per each iaspectioa over 1st SMtlonl2J0,S«lMll(C) NOTE: 501 cubic yards or more requires a Condilional Uic Permit unless approved as part of building permit. SIGNS Temporary Permanent SJ5.00 (Per 1097 UBOSBC Standard Schednlc) Minimum $35.00 2002Fce Schedule-Page 16 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ANH INSPECTiOW Fr.FS (CONT.t Pem^HTvfie SPECIAL INSPECTION CHARGES Site InipcctloR willioHt permit (wkcfl caHcd by owner) Impcction lurcluirte Tor work or spplirnlion on Blf liland or Deeriag lilamJ Reinepeetion fee iRer failnrc to comply with Building, Septic or Zoning Code Correction Notice - Jrd trip FIRE PROTECTION Fire Prevention Inspection Fire Code Permits Commercial Fire Atorm Plan Review Fee Fire Sprinkler Systems - Commercial Kitchen Fire Eitingnishing System • Commercial LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM BURNING PERMITS Up to 5 times per year For Each Reinspcctinn More than 5 times per year (for all organliations and IndhrMnab regardlets of lai status) CONTRACTUAL INSPECTION SERVICE Monthly Retainer Fee (includes clerical time) Inspectioo Charge Plan Review Charge Clerical Fee (Only charged if clerical use b ctccssivc) AppBeablc Code Section SJ0.00 $3B.M per trip * boat rental If tra >,iortalion h not provided by owner S JO.OO p«r trip r SM.OO per hour after 1st hour Ord. 223 No Charge SJ0.00each Per 1997 UBC Schedule 6S% of permit fee S 35.00 minimum fee or 1.25% orcoalmct price Surcharge based on valuation Per 1997 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule S 35.00 No Charge S 20.00 SI00.00 Per Contract S 25.00 per month S 25.00 per inspection Per *997 UBC/SBC .Standard Schedule 5 20.00 per hour 2002 Fee Schedule-Page I? LICENSES A MISCELLANEOUS rilARGF.S commercial marina license ApfrikathM Fee (hiitial) RcQcwal AppRcatioa A l•spcctio■ Fee (•mmI) piM: •Me fee JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE Appllrilioii Fee (inttlal) Rcaewil Applkelira Fee Pies cack slip Late Fee CANOE RACK RENTAL CARBAGE HAULER LICENSE • Rat rale •.per liaalcr • traiisfcr Im HOME OCCUPATION LICENsF. TEMPORARY TRAILERS A BUILDINGS LICENSE ZONING DEPARTMENT DOCl^MENTS 2MMF2020 CoaiprckcMivc Plaa Meakipal Code Book - coMpkte (Ck. M2 w/rrviskNis) Meakipal Code Book - Perlloas Cb I tkm 9 (Book I) er/revtoioas Ch 10 tkre 12 (Book 2) w/revkloas Ck n only (Zoelag Code) w/revteloas Ck 11 oely (Sebdiv. Code) w/revbioos Olber ladhrldBal Chapters—ViWiteo Coaip. Plaa AaieadaMat «2 (Hs»y 12) Applicable CodeSeellea BSOt.00 SIM.M $100.00 S 90.00 $20.00 S 2.00 $29.00 S40.0tNlip $90.00 $ llOO^rack $30.00 Sertioa 9JS $ 90.00 Initial Review Fee $ 30.00 (Anaeal Revkw Fee) ScctiM 10.20. Sabd. 4(0 $30.00 $79.00 $60.00 w/biader $39.00 loose $39.00 loose $ 29.00 loose $19.00 loose S .29/pafc S 5.00 $ 9.00 2002FtcSchtdkU-Pasr !H LICENSr-S St MKCELLANKOUS CHAftCrii fCfWIT.I PwmmrtTm City Maps Topocrapkle laforaatioB Bviying A PlBBMlag Pablicatioiii Ccaenil Adwliihtnuhrc lictnscs/Ftaft Tobacco Lkcascs Licensee or Enployce ViolalioM sirllhin 24 month period IslOfrcnie 2nd Offense 3rd Offeuc A Oser GambUng A Rafne Lkense Solkitalioa License Tnuuknt Merchant Lkenie Cesmral Adnshibtmthre Dam meats listteg Information AnemmenC Search • Written (Verbal tearcbes not given) Fax Ckarge Copy Service (for poMk City records only) ir X I7** copies Indhridnal copies of Ordinances (1 copy) Reprint of Oversiaed Documents that have been microfilmed Bttilding Plan Copies Current Street Addren Book Labcb from Utility Billing System Audio Recording Duplication Returned Check Charge CodeSectinn£xf S 2.00each S 12.00 per acre ♦ cnglMcrfnf cotmillant foe if computer diskette is required As Potted • Prices subject to change SIOO.OO Section 5J4 S 75.00 5200.00 $2.50.00 S 10.00 5100.00 plus actual costs up to $1,500 SIOOlOO plus actual costs up to $1,500 Section 5J3 Section SJO SccthM5J0 S 10.00 S IS.00/pnrctl S .25/page S .2Scaeb S 1.00 each No Charge Cost of copying sers kc. Messenger ten ke A Min. Clerical Fee of $5.00 Cost of Copy ing, Messenger Senke A Min. Clerkai Fee of $5.00 (entire amount to be paid upon request) $25.00 $.05 per label (approximately $150.00) $ 10.00 per tape S 20.00 2002FetScheMe-Pagf 19 LICfiNSRS A MISCELLANEOUS CHARCES (CONT.) ApftUriMe Ptn^il Tvbc Cff Code Sect ioa DOG UCENSCS Scc«loa9.l2 IhiaMal Lkcssc (its«cd ia odd )can)S 15.00 Aoooal UceoM (inocd io rvro yean oaly)$ 7,50 KENNEL LICENSES Sect ioa 5J6 CoBinicrcial AppIkalioB A Intpcctioa Fee $150.00 (AoDoal) Rcsideallal AppIkalioB A laspcclkM Fee $25.00 (Aaaoal) NOTE: Dop kept ia mUMlial keaadf aost be bidlvldaally IktOMd. Rcsidcotial keoaci fee ta io addMioa to dog liceoM feet. DOGS AT LARGE • RELEASE FEE Section 9.12 First Offeate $55.00 Secoad Offeaae $65.00 Third Offeaac $75.00 ARer Hoars, Weekend A Holiday Release Charge $75.00 ANIMALS AT LARGE (Other thaa dogs). Release Fee .Section 9.IJ First Offense $55.00 Sccoad Offeasc $65.00 Third Offense $75.00 Trace A Catok Aaiaal $35.00AMar Trailer Charge $ 55.00 Has J1 aOc (total distance) CARE OF IMPOUNDED ANIMAL Arlaal Cost 2002Fee Schedule-Page 20 U ^ I •—im UCF.WSF.S A MiscrujkNrcMis riiA^i;i.s k of^T.> Ptnwtt Tv^ Pollct Ptpirtiwiit A4wl»U tcfc<i BCER, WINE A UQUOR LICENSES iBit^Bl l■vnlig•lio■ 0«-Salc/0fr*Sale Liqaor£I.2 Brer On Sak/ JJBrrrOrrSalcAVine !■ lUle iavMtitatioa Om itatc iave«ti|Blion OfT-Stte UqiNir UceBM Bond RcquirciBCBt Ob -Sb Ic LhiMor U ctric OB-Sale WiBe LkeBM 3 J Beer OfT>Sale (A bbbb I) 3.2 Beer Ob-.SbIt (AbbbbI) Sctap(ABnuBl) riab Liquor Lkcuac (weekday) (SuRday) TeRiporary Sct*up PerRiil (obc day) TcRiporBr)i Beer Permit (oae day) Liquor Violallouf I** VlolaUoa 2-^ ViolatioR i-* ViolalloR 4* ViolalhM AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSES Per Eatabllilimeat (AaRual) Per Maclilae Fee PUBLIC DANCE LICENSE (aaaual) (iRdivMual Permit) LARGE ASSEMBLY PERMIT (over 3M people) FIREWORKS PERMIT FIREARMS DISCHARGE PERMIT OccaaloBal (HmUad uae) Game ABimalt (HmMed uae) ArrubI (Club Ouly) Applicable CudteSeethia 51.00. 00pei Lkeme CoBected at ApplieatioB Actual coal up to SIO.OM Actual coal $l5eJ0 SS^.OO 55.000. 00 $2,000.00 S 50.00 $ 100.00 S 100.00 S 200.00 S 200.00 S 50.00/cach S S0.00/eacb SectioB 4 JO ScctloR 4 JO SeclioR 4.40 ScctioB 4.20 Scetkm 4 JO ScclioR 4.60 SectloR 4.50 SeclioR 4J0 SeclioR 4.61 Sccliou 4.21 $500.00 $1,000 A 3 day Uceuae lUBpcusloB $2,000 A 2 week Uceuae auapeualeu Lkcuie rcvocalioa $100.00 ♦ machiue fee $ 25.00 cBch $100.00 $ lAOO SecthM 5.20 SectioaSJI ScctIuuSJI $200.00 $60.00 each ScctioaSJS addHioual day; actual caeD up to SIJOO $50.00 $10.00 $25.00 $25.00 Secthm 9.10 Sectieu 9.10 LICENSES A MISCELLAWEOtJS CHAWCiES <CONT > Aaotiotkw Tvmi PoBct PwrtMMMi HR^ARMS PERMIT TO ACQUIRE HREARMS PERMIT TO CARRY LIMITED TRAPPING PERMIT PARADES A SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT FALSE POLICE ALARM USER FEES Fint false abrai/calcMfar year ScccMid false alarat/caleadar year Third falM abrai/caleadar year Foarth false abrm/cabadar year Fifth and over bbe abm/calendar year FALSE FIRE ALARM USER FEES First bbe abmVcakndnr year Second bbe abim/cabadar year Third bbe abrm/calendar year Fonrth false abmi/cakadar year Fifth A over bbe abmi/cakMbr year FINGERPRINTING SERVICE COPY SERVICE • Police Records First Two Copies Additbnal Copies SUMMARY DATA REPORT COPY OF ACCIDENT REPORTS AccUcnl Photos S29.M SSO.M SM.00 Scetbn f.l I, Ord. 232 A Ord. 243 S9a.00orS200.Mifovcr Section 4.M 2M peopkt actnal costs np to S13M Section 9JS No Charge S 50.00 5100.00 SI 50.00 5250.00 Nn Charge S 75.00 5250.00 5350.00 5500.00 each call SectleaOJS S 25.0irapplkalloa for 2 cards RESIDENTS ONLY SI3.00 each addUlonal card (Citteenship No Charge) S 5.00/flrst page * S.25 each aJiIitbaal page S 0.25 each $10.00 S 5.00 each S 25.00 ninii rtual cost COPY OF DRIVER'S LICi'NSE RECORD $ 5.00 each UCENSF-S A MISCr.LLANF.CHJS C h<%;u;F„S <CC>NT.^ A»BliMtkMi Tv— COfV FROM MICROFICHE FILE FIrat Two Copks AAMkmal Copin $10.00 S .Mcadi ’•NO PARKING ORDER OF POLICE- paper MfM (bo tatb ioclodcd) $1.00 each AUDIO TAPE DUPLICATION VIDEOTAPE DUPLICATION $ 10.00 carb $90.00 eacb r: PUBLIC WORKS lir.rAWTMr.NT MISCKU.ANEOUS CIIAH(;KS yiilHT Kmn - rn^hrc bctlimin F‘r*l QiiarUr 2001 MUNICIPAL SF.WCR RATF. by nU: l»l 2nd by now: S 10.45 per quarter S 7U0 per quarter S JJ4/IOOO{aUoiiplits S ll.l5perqBarterperroBBertioa MUNICIPAL WATFR RATFS Area 01 WiYorrf Area 02 Hwv 12 Area 03 Chew Cbaie Billins A Ready to Serve Chg Water Uia|e Rale Unconnected Properly Cb( (ready to serve/hydrant chg) S24.75/qlr $9.0Wqlr $9.00/qir $2.09/1000 gal S2.90n000gal $2.11/1000 gal $24.70/qlr -0- -0- Fedcrally Mandated Safe Drinking Water Tealhig Progran (Charged per «<-nriee conncctioB) $ 5.21 per year on lecond quarter billing Bulk ule to Minnetonka Beach (or Lafayette Ridge Area - Area 01 Rate S24.7a'qtr billing charge plat $2.09/1000 galloB total flow at border meter. Balk tale • All Others - $25.00 per localkw plat area rale per/1.000 gallowi. Lc. Fill swimming pool or watering tod. Penalty for late payment ofscwer/waler bilh - i*A after 30 days from billing dale (applied to tbe total anpahl babneek Inlerett at S% on nnpaid waler/tcner MIb ccrlined. Water Tum-On Water Turn-off $20.00 Minimum $ 20.00 Minimum Water System Repair/Replaccmenl if damage caused by property owent Labor - Curreul Hourly Rale Parts • At Cost RECYCLING CHARGE Recycling Container - Initial for new residence Replacement Container (including tales las) Wheel Kit $ 23.00/ycar No Charge $3.00 each $.5.00 ruauc WORICS DEFARTMEWT MISCF.LLANECHJS CHARCF-S ICONT.^ Esc GOLF COURSE CHARGES - Efftclive date 2001 Seatoa Moaday tlira Friday (eictodtef llelidayi) ■tfia rtay Icfer* 12:00 Nooa 1st Niae Holes 2ad Niae Holes After 12:00 Nooa aad Weekead Rates S 9.25 S L2S FALL RATES 1st Niae Holes S 11.25 • Weekend Rales: 2ad Niae Holes $ 1.50 1st Nine $9.25 2ad Niae Holes S 6.25 2nd Nine $6.25 (Weekday After 12:00 Nooa)Riding Cart $S.0Wper nine League Rates Monday thru Friday S 9.50 - Weekday Rales: 1st Niae $7.00 Seaior Citizen (Over 60 years old)2nd Niae $4.00 Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon . Weekdays Sr. A Jr.$4.00 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes S 6.25 S 6.25 Riding Cart $ 6.00fper nine ScaioB Ticket (Seaioe CiUeeas Oaly) S16U.00 GOLF CART RENTAL Motorized: 1st Niae Holes (kRer 12:00 A Wcekeadt) $11.00 2ad Niae Holes S 9.00 Befla Play Before 12:00 Nooa 1st Niae Holes 2ad Niae Holes Pall Cans - Per Roaad Golf clubs - Per Roaad S 9.00 $ 7.00 S 2.S0 S J.00 .STUDENT RATE (AGES 12 • 17) Begia Play Before Noon Moaday • Friday, Eicludlag Holidaya 1st Niae Holes 2ad Niae Holes S 0.2S S L2S CONCESSIONS As Posted rUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES A SERVICtlS £ff $IOO.Ot/itd. ligH Ott Qttolc Bull Sircct or Traflk SIfn (mIc lactodts hutalbUon) Driveway Catveria (nk oaly, act iaatallrd) Water Meter Sales (Sec Baildiag PeriaU Sectioa) Teaiporary No Parhlag SIgas (wilhoal lath) S 1.00 eack Drivcway/Carb-Cat Peraiila Individual Driveways $ 30.00/permit New Street Inlerseclloni (Sec loaing aeclion - Special iaiprovcmeat fees) Address Change Request by Owaer S50.00 per address SECTION i. This ordiaaare establishing the 2062 Fee Schcdalc shall be pabibked as a Saaimary Ordinaacc ia the Laker and Pioneer Newspaper and iImII be cAhetive the week of Jaanary 1,2002. Adopted by tbeCHy Conneil of the City orOroao on this lOth day of December, 2001. ATTEST:Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor UadaS.Vcc.CityClcrfc 2002Fet Schtdlih-Page 26 rr>, „ .acting >w:qdest for council action 0£C 1 0 2001 DATE: Dcccabcr 4,2MI ITEM NO: DepartaieBt Approval: Naac RooMoone TMt City Administrator Adminbiralor Reviewed:Afteada Sectioa: City Administrator's Report Iteai Description: Long Lake Fire Station Site'Soil Correction Bids A tabulation of the bid results fur the soil correction work on the Long Lake fire station site is attached, showing Ingram as the low bidder at S2I7,88I . The amount budgeted for soil correction is $260,000. Although the bid is substantially below the budgeted amount, the actual cost could exceed the bid amount if the condition of the soils is found to be worse than indicated by the soil borings. Because the permitting process for the soil correction work through the Minnehaha Creek >\*atershed District has an uncertain Umeline. staff recommends the Council delay the award of the bid and the authorization of contract execution until the required permits ore received from the MCWD. The MCWD may take action to approve a permit at its December 13 meeting. Becuuse the Council does not have another regular meeting scheduled in December; in order to expedite Council approval subsequent to the MCWD approval, staff requests the Council be availuble to approve the award of the bid and execution of the contract through a polling of the Council members by the City Administrator. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: No action required. •IdPMkagtfl SHs Excavation and Engii dFU Orono, Wnnaaoli SEN No: A-BKVOIM201.00 Bid Dali: Novombar 27.2001 Pifilof 1 NamoofBiddar ActoowdidBi Nac^ptof Addandum Ma 1 Bid Bond BM Amount Cepe^17^. W UiMUiuttr htutjr w/1/2.‘14. 3‘fC.^8‘i4-.s-s" ■CotovzO^siM 1^ I/' 2.H, sai.®'’ (S.t. OWPAOT- • pft?. *’® fipA-Ttfe/DME 1/1.b-V,-hM 10901 MCMtOiM. Mi aOO OMMoaino 9)1902400 FM9)19t2Jf01 200/100*4 CIZI9 axn fljayi lo xiio 2296 9L» 296 C0>9T I002.1.2*AON DEC 1 0 2001 cut <-»r UMUIW REQUE5rr FOR COUNat ACTION DATE: Dccenbcr6,200l ITEM NO: f Dcpartmcflt Approval: NaaM RooMoone Titk City Admiaistfalor Adniaistrator Reviewed:Ageada ScclioB: City Administraior's Rqmrt UtM DcacripCioB: RcaohiHoa la Sapport of tlM John Loag Lake Fire Slatioa Coastractioa CoaiaiHtee*! Work aad Recoaiaieadatioat. The Joint Long Lake Fire Station Construction Committee, which includes three representatives from Orono and three from Long Lake, as well as a representative from Medina and the Long Lake Fire Chief as non-voting members, has been working for several months to develop a schematic design and budget for the Long Lake fire station project. The Joint Committee presented a recommended schematic design and project budget at a joint meeting of the Orono and Long Lake City Councils held on November 20. 2001. At that meeting, both City Councils approved the recommended schematic design and project budget Both City Councils have expressed an interest in recognizing the Joint Committee for its work, and in indicating their support for the Committee’s work and recommendations. A resolution in support of the Joint Committee’s work and recommendations is attached for Council consideration. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt a resolution in support of the Joint Long Lake Fire Station Construction Committee's work and recommendations. RIISOLITION IN SUPPORT OF THF WORK OF THE JOINT FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE IN THE DESIGN OF THE NEW LONG LAKE FIRE STATION W'HEREAS. the Oruno City Council appointed three representatives to the Joint Fire Station Construction Conunittce to oversee the design and construction of a new Long Lake Fire Station to be located at 340 Willow Drive North; and W HEREAS, the Joint Fire Station Construction Committee, with the assistance of qualified consultants, has been meeting regularly over the post four months with representatives of the Volunteer Fire Department to accomplish its mission of designing and consmicting a quality. cost-elTcctivc. functional fire station that ensures the long-term viability of the Long Lake Volunteer Fire Department and the quality of scr\ ice it provides in meeting the needs of communities that it serves: and W'HEREAS, to accomplish its mission most cost-efTectivcly and to avoid delaying llie construction of new tnmk Highw ay 12. the Joint Fire Station Construction Committee established a schedule to allow for advertising for bids in late February , which is generally the time of year when the best bids are received, and to enable the construction of the new station to be completed by December 2002; ;md W HEREAS, in holding to this schedule, the Joint Fire Station Construction Committee presented a schematic design plan for the new fire station to the City Councils of l.ong Lake. Orono, and Medina in a joint meeting on November 20, 2001 ; and W'HEREAS. the cities of Long Lake, Orono, and Medina approved the schematic design plan lor the construction of a 17,329 square foot fire station at rji estimated cost of S3.545.080. including land acquisition; and W'HEREAS. following the advice of its consultants, the cities authorized four add- alternates (a 6^^ bay, a hose tower, on epoxy floor in the bay area, and space within the lounge area for tlic Department's 1 926 studeboker) to be designed and made a part of he bid package for consideration by the City Councils of Long Lake, Orono, and Medina at the tir.c that bids am received; and Page I of2 WHEREAS, by utilizing odd-altcmates, the Joint Coniwiittce is cany ing out its fiduciary' responsibility by building flexibility Into the bidding and final decision process in a way that does not lock the cities into high costs, but enables decisions to be made regarding the ^d« alternate items on the most ad\*antageous flnaiKial terms. NOW THEREFORE^ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA THAT: It is supportive of the work of the Joint Fire Station Construction Committee, particularly, the development of the schematic design plan for the new Fire Station presented at the Nov'ember 20, 2001, joint City Council meeting including the use of add-aitemates. The ConstnKtion Committee, through its consulumts, will continue to wt)rk with the Volunteer Fire Department and solicit their input into the design and construction of the new station. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 10th day of December, 2001. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor AITEST: Lindas. Vee,City Clerk Page 2 of2 DEC I 0 2001 C» I r Otvjf^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Dcccaibcr 6,2001 ITEM NO: f 3 Dcpartascat Approval:Adniinbtrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name RonMoorsc City Administratof^ Title City Administrator Report Item Description: Payment Requests-Lung Lake Fire Station Payment Approval Proceas The $3,498^00 from Mn/DOT and the S680.000 from Orono arc both now in a joint account, controlled jointly by the Cities of Long Lake and Orono. The account enables the funds to be invested and to be used to make payments related to the fire station. Hie payment approval process is as follows: 1. Invoices received arc copied to both Cities. Any questions regarding invoices arc reviewed and discussed with the Joint Construction Committee and its consultants. 2. The City Administrators place the Request for Payment on the City Council Agendas for appro'al. 3. If approved by both City Councils, Orono will prepare a check from the Long Lake/Orono joint account. 4. The check will require signatures from both Long Lake and Orono. and will be distributed for payment. 5. Orono and Long Lake will each receive monthly account statements from the joint account. 6. At the completion of the fire station project, the joint account will be independently audited by -ithcr city’s auditing firm. Reauests for Pavment 1. Attached is an invoice from SHI I in the amount of $5,380.42 for the fire station site surv ey and the staking of supplement soil boring locations on the site. The $5,000 lump sum fee for the site survey, as well as the $380.42 for the soil boring staking were both approv ed by the Project Manager. 2. Attached is an invoice from the Construction Bulletin, in the amount of $146.70. for the advertisement for bids for the soil correction work on the fire station site. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the requests for payment in the amount of $5,380.42 to SEH for the site survey and staking of soil boring locations, and to the Construction Bulletin for the bid advertisement in the amount of $146.70, and to authorize payment of the invoice amounts. J No,WliiS,200l 1M01 Mm CM OilM. rnnkUmmn .IMWM1M1 MU1UM Mstal MU1UM1 ngt tnmtfwnmtttm RB: LoiiUki,KfinDe8QtA Fire StitiaB 8te Svnrey and Soa Boiisg SEHNb. A-LONQL0106.01 JoanCadaon Booldcaapar OtyofLoofUke 1964 Fade AvaiW P.O. Box 606 ^Long Lake. MK 55356-0606 DaarJoaoL: Th«MirfiiMid tavoice intl» axnonid of $5^80.42ii rite anivay aaoetaBy fcr th« Fiia Stidott along widxIlia ftaldBC of supplcmaanl aoil bodngs. Hit S5,000 hasp mm Iba Kdc at |wt of die fim sWiflB bn^ the ntadfd to be added to the previouily ynepared toil bodngt. . , If yoohOT my Sinocnly, ,Boxnid,P-®-/ CityEfigiseer ka Bitflotm • V W lUk MaoiNM ctaiioiM Miitoe,mmu-oei Mxrtjeoe nuiijieinx trdUUitmTa mgtMuHug rr—ymtrtM fimll Nrmatf To: 9938 VUnls Contor On«t. fOO SCH Conor, tt. Pool. M iS110-n0l • flf^lieJOOO • ■03293095 cmr OF LONG LAKE ATm JOAN CARLSON, BOOKKEEPER 1Qt4 PARK AVENUE PO BOX BOB LONG LAKE MN 6515A0fi0fi NownMr 13.2001 ProjiMtNo: ALONCLOIOO^ InvoieeNK 0QBi4t7 i FIRE STATION SITE SURVEY AND SOIL BORMO LOCATION STAKINC T« Pn 8U8SURFACS M1CSTJQEOTECHN Houpa Rata Amounl STAFF ENQINOR KLUNO.KRAIOI 2.00 90.00 150.00 SR TECHNICIAN KRUSE. BRIANT Totals 8802.00 104.00 344.00 • ToINLabor 344.00 EMPLOYEE MKEAGB BMFL TRAV^OTHER FROJ EXP EQUPMENT EXPENSE Total RaMuTH . 5.17 1129 2IL00 OOjtt MAI .Total this task ■i Task: 34000. DESIGN SURVEY Fm Total Faa Poroont CompMa 5.000.00 100.00 TotNEmO Prevfoui Faa BUHno Cuirant FM soling TOINFM 5.000. 00 0.K 5.000. 00 5.000.00 Total this tMk UOOGJM UMfi Clton Hiadrictaon Ina.OfflMt locfitd Uiroufhout thi Upptr MievNt mUl^ympLn,4asl^mdMllimt. iputi OppanujiMy famipyw ^ 900/C00*4 99n0 8XV1 SNOT iO A1X3 ZZ9S 9L9 ZU LVOX 1003.90*010 Parks & RcciTation Alihla CauMv. AIN Sa«Miu faruat Slat* rarii • >’aw Cl.mN^D^”||^S/3MI At)VERTI.srME.\T rOR HI S(il*<l p<rkm| r^K3'Wiava5iSs;di j til* «i (hr Rcfioaal Hutiaeit M*'1*I*JL* Offit*. a* CoaiinKtion Maid D mj PIm Room is HrooU)a J(il*il ptjpuwU to rurniili ih« compir'* cootiruitKio of ^^g^'ANNA PORTAGE STATE NE\» SA.NTTATION BLUOING oora 18 HrooU}a ■: I--:** R»ob > tn )Ui. itx Naioajl AMoniDoa ot rttk. ihf Ooi)|t >Ua**puUi. ih* Smu----------------- Niiixfiry Coairariort of Miaacaoa in rr^iSpKiisriuuSpir vuwraawn oi 9UflflCMUI in 4a«*ai*ai», Hraaian B-l\« .'U’’/5-<M 0»n*T MaiDNR. t>«tMoa at Pads anJ Rccrrauon ,V«S5!?; kK«i ! a iti* aUrru Wtowa hdoa mJ 2 M p.«, Na«*«brr IS. 2801 aiica lb*]' aill bt publKl) rtad akMd Major ittmt j( »ott arc maoval of *uMiji| icaional vamliiKMi twiUlini ami coiumjciKin of a n*» icatonal umuacn KaJilini ai tw ..'mmxaita] on eaaaaag uic ButUini to UKluk mmhanacal. elecaxal aikl til* •orK Dia«in|t am) ipcciricationi at prvpa/rd b« tb« MmONR Bureau of fa..iliu*» and Opefauoat Sunoct. a>« on flit at the Rrfioaal Buiiacit Maitain • OflU*. Nataoaal Aaaocubon ol Miaom Comiorv «K OaMtssoa M«k«t Dau Ptao Roooi m Nr* H ock . DM Oo^ Plaa Rooa la Miaiwip^ and <■ Btalikn Eattwaata bcaadatK loUoataf citin OuliA. Mmaeapoiit St Cloa, am) St Paul. MN Copttt ol profioui foraa. coeinct dvtiffima drauui|t and ipraficaboat tor uM bt Conation la imK b —m a tud mat br obtautttl uiihuta a drpoM. bom ire Rriumal Bunnett Manaarr To lAtain riant or btdJm bn. conimt th* RrriotiarButinrii Manarrr RfcftlOSSL Bl SINtSJOFFlCf NLnnritO Orpt of .Saturai Rrttivnrt C O Ian Giabam INll Minnrtou Dnt* Bramcrd. M.\ 5«40t T*i*ptutn«i:i«it:s:6do Fat iTMi »:s :4J7 Proirci ifthnual informatioa it atailablr from Mfcba*! Parralrau Arttutcvt Tr'KTtion* number (651 i;s: e'tiu Th* Arthilrd uOI cunducl a nan mandatao prrbtd me*tta« la mWa —I--------*----------T'-^ 1 pvrtInnM h. toniracaul n^aurmrau an TurtAat. \otrmbct 8.1.88 nan. al lb* projrrl Ml*. 1' >11: Carltwi C'ounit. M\ The ContlrucUofl UfNlout* Lake Slal* Park CmSIM. DUF lliTATiMI .kCATlif.LOl nev CE.NTER A.NDPkRKOmCE ,tn\ ERflStMENT TOR BIOS Sealed piorotalt m furnith ih* Coirrieir kontirwuon itf Sldot* lake Su(* Park A(aitiG*alo*t Craler and Park OfBc* Carllan CauMt f lU >a.: tpk882J«.88.|TJl;p88- BJNo ;oo: i:2)i Ofner MnONIl. thtiMMof Pnlt and Recreation • ill be receited b> lb* R**kmu 1 Butineii Mana|rr in hii/her office locawt) u lb* addiett tboun beiem tmal J OO pm., Notember 28. 2001 mhen Ibev •ill be publicly lead aloud Mator lumi of uork are 11 DemoUooo of ib* *u>un| cooiac* 2i T*mporary relocaiioa of ibe 4on«aM •*!** ttiiem IiCanenl. Bwchaeica)aad«ks8«cai coaaov, 300 aa »bo«a o* Ol* Dnanaga and.or 4*wnb*d bmeia (or Sii* aio*niii«« rclaud lo ib* ocn boUitei X*n t»lhcl*«o8incoAMdRteamd Ta abiala plM* ar bMdert Hat. vfifiJ. "" **tt«*al Batlaeta bidi UM.I 2 80 P.\u Nnamnbrr B. 2081 at lb* ofTic* ol die Pirchattn* Ajeni in Cily Mall. 221J Weal Old Sbakopet Road. Bloominaion MN JWII Each propoaal OMU b* cicarit caletaey oanaher *f bWl“lid abail abo« Ibe name and nkbcaa of On bdder Bida rcceitrd aflet dua lur* will wt be atcepicd Bull •ill be opened pabucN and read aloud immediately aher die apccified clotina umc in die Cd> HaU Council Chambera All laierc peraottt arc intucd to aurad !___ receited aflee dut bmc aed date uiil be rerumed unopened B.d Pmoaalt lo^bc talid 10 M uorkdaya for die All prime biJdrra ate rcqwted lu e^tide •lib cbeif bid a BidW^ or CcrtUied Caahicn Check made payable 10 ihe Cut of Bloominaion. in ifcr amouM III Ate retirnt i S'!) of dirir bti A Pra Bld ConfemK* «H| beheld MUlaher U 2001 el IJO P.Mal Ibe Slnetenmn Jo^ fNHc* hxatid off of Mih Sircti and Logaa Atcaac. Bloomiafloa^l.N . *^^rONM BLMNESS OmCf Muirirtuu thpt of Nanrat Rmatmet Grand Rapidt MN 33744 Telephone (2H i ):7-I|0I Fit i;i3i ,i::a3>f3 Proieci lechmcal information it aiailable b. m Mark Longnorth. SKI) TaS-wrai li"* * ««ml>*r Pu Mk acceta'uie II 2' II « Public Buildings Bluomingtaei, MN I ontcrvcl Tbt Nr* Cin iUaPalicc n i>sing'd %Veimw8oi INMItnON TO BIO HIOPkCKkGEdl Ihr Ciit ol BlooimiiitL'n it teekine b«ti m iomautt ibe or» C«> llaUiPok.e A Am Faciliit for ihc Ciiy of BliMminpioii Sraird bidt thall be icceitrd lor each of (be fultoaine tieurkl i jitptnet m acctrdnKe •-i\ d* Contiruciion CN<cumenti prrrarrd bt Ankeny Kafl ArehHeeta. Ccwraci Catet.<r> } . Coeettre Pa»rB>d Iuirp Sum r A'leitvMet Comraci Ci!e|ort a - Struciural Sieel Ba>* Bd Lnrp Sum • Ikiiiiai i C.^uact CaierTt 3 ■ Maioory ■ Ba.* Bn) I ump Sum ♦ Ahemairt C.^kt Caiet.et h • Merhamcal Bax Bid I uirp Sum • A Cimtra,i CauiCimtra,! Cauji ______ Bax Bid I uiry Sum • ASemiiet Coniiaci (.airtory I . phat Silet.trk Bate Bid Lump Sue Ahemairt !ort 7 . Elecincal Alwmairt Cwdki Catepms 1 CUanp • Bat* Bid_Lump Su.m • Allemaiet luniiact Cairrnry |i) • Roofine - B»J I um;» iam • Mumoxci Concfxi \ \ • CoKstyint • Biw BiJ Lump • tr • Aittmjut Catet>r> 4* SriffhhO • Bkw Brtl Lump Son Cor^t C11 CofTW S-ic; aA*4 BtJ lu-jp Sum « AUtmutt C^mrKtC^#|oo 14 - A^ou icil TffXffvnu • Bsh« B iaJ Loom Sera • Aiiemjwi C^ati Caupxt 13 . Tile - Bate Bid Lump Sum . AJwmatet Conu* I Cautory 16 • Painba| • Base B «l Lump Sam ♦ AJimutei Coniraci Catetory IT - Floonne • Bax Bid Lui^ Sum * Alicmaiei Conuacl Caiefory IS . Crncral Conttfucuon - Baac Bid Lump Sum • Altemaiei Connci Caietoo 19 ■ Theater Su|c • Ba»« Bid Lump Sum * Ahemaut Comraci Cax|oey 20 • Landaeapm| • ■*< Lump W ♦ Alieraat** Thit Project hat eaiploeed a;^:3irs7£rl& Soil* 332 POBot 7lOi3NMOi *<»> Meadma Lane Soeib M.nixapofii MN 33422 Miancapolit Baildert Eachaaee 112.) Glenuvxu] kienuc XliniKapi ’lii MN 33403 F )k IXMte Plan Room *rtia) Pitk'aun A>rao* Edina MN 534)3 Si Paul Builden Euhan|t 443 Famnru'n Sireei Si Paul M' ICC Cemer D •MN 3)421 iirontibiliiy c if m (be etent iKti mt dcKumems ait rue ■ncitided in dut rackaer. lo obtain coy n at tpecified from iKc Contiruclioa Manaper ^m* Biddert onlt mat iccisc a act of lb. Ci'nira.1 Draainpi and Project Coniiructuin Market Daw 9441 3. lencc Cem Ntu Flope ,MN S342S It It tbe reirtmtibiliiy of tb* Bidder. er Drue 13! «‘«4 The tt.crttful bidder thall be tei^iretl to rnrt idr a PrtlormaiKe Bo^ and a Mncilal and I abte Patmeta Ben) in the amount ol 100 jxrceai of th* Contract kmouri iSe* SectMO 00300 • Fijernt ol Apteemenii The Cut of Bloomin|ton cetertet the iifht to rejett any and all bidi, includmi uiibccit liin.Ubon die nfbts to reject ant or all nonconlornunf. oc>n- rrtp-ntice unbalanced, or conditioeal BiJt and to a*ard a contract in die bett inirieti ol the Cut The City alto reirrtet the ri|hi to nut* aat int.'rTTtalitiet The Cut ol Bloommfton btrebt rwetSet) aO trddtn dial rtocoritea ouned andccuiO Ji!e)bt Bunontici or •omca • lit be afforded matimum featible oppoMumi) to lubmit bidi aad-cr pro(wcatt and •ill aoi be wbjtctrd to diK-ruTunjMn cn du baaca of race, coice. wt. Mtual oneniatioA age. rcUg on. ancetirt handicap pubix auituace. mar;al. or naiionai ongta The Cut of Bloomington doei not ditcnmmate on Ihr bam of diaabtliit m the n)ntiauon or kena to. or Baa tmerit or rmrloymem uv oi tertvea. progjatm. oractitiixierrv Of BLOOMLNCTON Betcfly Rauich Phrebatinj Agent 10.191 icf26f|| 2 niraiSiiftPcJS. CLOSI>5!*DATt I l/r/3801rm for Bid*Adtertitet The Cioei of Long Late tad Orano rrijurtt waird b W.,rk ai lollont !or CoaainKiioa B.d PKkjge *1 SiM EicatrMitM and Enrinerred Fill Piojrct 1 ong Lakr firt Stauon 0»net Ciiiti of Long Lake and Ormo Lonf Lake City Hall I9hl Park keenua PO BotbO* Icug Lake MN 33)36 B.dt Our 2:88 P.M Tacada* NweeaAer 2T, 2881 Bull mcetvad tAer tbit time •ill not be accepwd Public Bid Openiag Couacil Chambrn Lone lakcCitv Hail ^ Type of BiJdiag Single Prime Copiei of Bidding Docaraenti atailabie un or a*«ui Nocemtee S. 2001 at Aichiirtt t icff.ee BKA Group 222 N Sec.wtd Street .Minnearilit MN 33401 Do.cumrnii rciilahic for public ■ncM.iiofi at NIinneapolii Buildert Erchaagc $1 Paul Buitdrrt Etchangc 3i Cloud Builder fichange Rcxhecirr Buiklen E ichangc F )k tkulge Plan Roum. .ShiMrapcika Architect t OffWc L ong Lake Cirt Flail OncooCiit Mall SEH Minnetonka OfTicer •932 «l2 2«tX). Prune contracroes may oteam up to dure MU of ikKumeara Bam Aiehnect ’t Office Ice a leiunaaN* dtnoM of S30 per xt d Nmafida bud u Mmmtacd and dcicume.iii ate reiwned mtlha ten 113i •irkmg date of bu) ofemng pRmdnd 9k ducumenii art comflex ui clean and ucabit coriditic-n and free from aurkr or other defacrmrni The coit of leplkx.i Rutung .e damignd doctaaena • III be dtduci.'d from Ihe dcpoiii Biddert au aided a Cuoiract may retain the Bidding rvnunwnu and tbeu depout • ill be refunded PLtchax of on* non- ftfundable complete tei available u a coti of Sk) Propcnali thall be accompanact) be a taiicfactoey biddert bond oc certified cbcc k in the rmeit of 6tft 31 priecnt of the bax bid pri.potal pattel* to tb* Citxi of Lexr lake and Otono The amou.|| of ibeNwc) • I'l be forfeiaed to tb* Ounrr m ibe etent dtal 8x bidder ladt ■«) eovr into a conaatt The^ncr rexrtet the rghi lo retain ite deponcu ol the 9iree Umeu bidden foe a period iKt to etc red Kelt Ace i43i day* abet the date art) or-* xt Ice ibe bid oprmrf .No bull irat be •.ibdraun for apemid of (cert fice 143. datt after ibt dare and itme xt lur t)te btd openina AUenuia pr>cft to be be J Kr inry i«i date ifser tb* time XI K'f tbe opening of tbe bidt Contratue thall furucb.Io the Owner a Contrxt Performance and Labue A .Maicriali Payment bund tor the full anv jri of tbe Work The Owner letrnet (be ngbi m iTjecI ant or ail SJa vcl to wave tnfotrr.alityer ard ..rrp.lmixt tbcreui Ji (be b«ddin| The Owner .iunher rexrc* tb* nght to award 9k Coneaii at ibt beti irscett ef 9k Ow ner Altemaica may be xiccsvriy ac.tpied or rejeexd m an> order at the Owner IdiKreturn Thaaipicctbaa J xtn apprrtal clauac. Sl Louit County. MN Conalrvcllon Of Garage A Storage Building CIOSING DAtElt/IS/nOI ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIOS StalrJ propoiali to (uiniib the '*cfcil';SrA “o“'iIO«ACt BLILDING international CENTER Sa Lotila Cl flW.C Bd.No Owner WOLF r.SCVCho'ifSSiidHliSh' M02IJ.O2 MniDNR.Buicao of Fm Siattco FacUioea and OaeraCMna Supnoit utll te recciied by iha Ragimul Buiincit Manager tn hi*/hae onxe CONSTIUCnONIUUniN9Nov«i«w2 2001. 20018 89 L DEC 1 0 2001 Cl 11 OnuinO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Dcccabcr i, 2M1 ITEM NO: j Lj DcpartMcat Approval:Adaiaiitirator Reviewed:Agenda Scctioa: Naaie RooMoorse r/City Administrator's TMc City Admkustiaior Re^ Iten Dtacriptioa: Apprabal ofCity-OwBcd Parcel The City has received an ofler lo purchase the two-acre parcel located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road. Although the City Assessor has provided a rough estimate of the value of the property, the Assessor has recommended that to obtain a more accurate indication of the parcel's value the City should hire an appraiser to conduct a formal appraisal. Attached is a proposal for appraisal services fiom the firm of Bakken. LeidI, Janssen.Day and Reach, Inc. The proposal is for a complete appraisal at a cost of $3,500. This Firm was selected on the basis of recommendations by the City Assessor and the City of Minnetonka. The appraisal will be completed by the end of Dnember. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to accept the proposal for appraisal services from Bakken, LeidI, Janssen, Day and Reach, Inc. at a cost of $3,500, and to authorize the appraisal to proceed. i I LI Bakken . Liedl. Janssen . Day reach . Inc. Voiuotton ConsuNonH • 6MS Wayiaio lowlavofd • i*e :04 • Minn«apoBs. MN 55424 • 412 525-0000 • Fa 412 525-M75 Fow« C. lotkvn. MAI. MS. CCIM CWtwt C. U«di. MAi M«K»o N. ioniMn. MAI Ti%omoi J. Dot MAI. SIA 0o»M S. ■•OCA. MAI November 29.2001 Ron Moonc. City Administrator City of Orono P.O.Ba66 Crystal Bay. MinncaoU 55323 Proposal for appraisal services on a 2-acre vacant cummercul site located at the northeast comer of Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road. Orono. Minnesota Dear Mr. Moorse This oone^iondeiKe is to formalue oie agreement as dboissed in our recent phone conversation. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal for appraisal services. I understand that you are looking at selling the above- rWerenced property, have an Interested l^yer, and arc in need of a market value appraisal. The property rights appraised would be the unencumbered fee-simple interest The intended users of the appraisal would be the City of Orono, and possibly the buyer. My proposal is for a complete appraisal and self-contained report. No permitted departures from Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) would be invoked Completed would be a highest and best use analysis, and a full inveshgation of comparable sales. The total tee would be 53,500, with the completion date of the appraisal by the end of December, 2001 My services would be Lmited to valuation of the subject and would not include any soil testing, other engineering, surveying, or analysis of any possible soil contamination I am faiiuliar with the local real estate market and have completed numcnxa UKome and land appraisals for a variety of clients. Be assured that my services and value opinkms would be professiorul and supported from the market. Attached are my qualifications. The fee quoted would iiKlude any initial meetings, inspection of the subject property, completion of the appraisal report, and any follow-up phone conversations regarding any questions or issues. Any further a.nalysis. consultations, updated appraisal, meetings or additiorul valuation assigruncnts would be billed at my standard hourly rate of S1S5 per hour. To formalize the engagement please sign and return a copy of this letter authorizing me to proceed with the assignment. Upon your authorization. I would make arrangements to meet with you and irupect the property. If you have any question* or conceno, please contact me 1 look forward to being of serv ice. Sincerely, AtJTHnBI7ATinM Tp J»a^rgi> BAKKEN. LIEDU JANSSEN. DAY tt REACH. INC. Thomas J. Day. MAI. ^ J MN Certified General Real Property Appraiser f4000eu Bje— Date;. Attachment \ rrs,REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DEC 1 0 2001 CllYUt-Unuf^ Dale: December 4,2001 lie* N©.: Dcpartatal Approval: Nibm: Michael P. Gaffroa Title: Planning Director Adaiiaiitrator Approval:Agenda Scctloa: Administrator Hen Dcacriptioa: Residential & Commercial Park Fees - Increase for 2002 - Resolutions The park dedication ordinance requires periodic review of the minimum and maximum residential park dedication fees to be charged per dwelling unit when a fee is accepted in lieu of land dedication. The ordinance requires that fees be updated by Resolution of the Council. The current fee structure was initiated in 1998 with a min/max fee of S2900/S4900 per dwelling unit, and was increased for the 2000-2001 fee schedules to $3100/S5300. The fees were last reviex^-ed one year ago in December 2000, and have been reviewed for 2002 in terras of the CPI and actual land value increases over the past year as noted by the City Assessor. Staff rccoramcnds increasing the min/max residential park fees for 2002 to $3250/55550 per the attached resolution. This is an increase of about 4.75% over the 2001 fees. Per previous Council action, commercial park fees arc calcu' ted on a per-acrc basis using a residential equivalency formula, in which ten (10) employees tve the same impact on the park system as one dwelling unit, and the average number of employees in the commercial/indusirial districts is 25 employees per acre. Therefore, the commercial park fee is calculated based on (25/10) or 2.5 dwelling unit equivalents per acre. Under the proposed fee update for 2002, the minimum commercial fee would be (2.5 x $3250) or $8125 per acre, with a maximum of (2.5 x $5550) or $13,875 per acre. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt Resolution No.__establishing the residential park fee at a minimum of $3,250 per dwelling unit and a maximum of $5,550 per dwelling unit. Motion to adopt Resolution No.__establishing the commercial park fee at a minimum of $8,125 per acre and a maximum of $ 13,875 per acre. Proposed notion: Moved by___, seconded by___, to adapt Resolution No.___csUblishing residential park fees at a minimum of $3,250 p^r dwcHIng unit and a maximum 0155,550 per dwelling unit; and establishing commercial/’ndustrial park fees at a minimum of $0,125 per acre and a maximum of $13,075 per acre. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM PARK DEDICATION AMOUNTS FOR RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL/MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ZONED LAND WHEREAS* the City's general park dedication requirement is 8% of the land being platted or subdivided; and WHEREAS, the City’s park dedication ordinance calls for the dedication requirement to be roughly proportional to projected impact of the proposed development on the City’s park system; and WHEREAS, because of the vastly differing land values in Orono, the park dedication requirement could result in park dedication requirements that are either significantly greater than or significantly less than the amount which is roughly proportional to the impact of the proposed development on the City’s park system; and WHEREAS, to address the rough proportionality issue, the City will periodically establish both a maximum and minimum park dedication amount per dxvettutg unit, based on an updated projection of the cost of the City’s park s>*stem. and the proportionate share of this projected cost to be borne by new dwelling units in Orono; and WHEREAS, the proportionate share of the projected cost of the City’s park s>-stcm to be borne by new dwelling units has increased to an average of $4,600 per household; and WHEREAS, the application of the City’s general 8% park dedication requirement would result in those properties with lower values paying less than the $4,600 average, and those properties with higher values paying more than the $4,600 average; and W'HEREAS, the establishment of minimum and maximum pork dedication fee amounts addresses the need for rough proportionality’ between the park dedication fee and the impact of the development on the park system. Page 1 of2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City Council does hereby establish the minimum park dedication amount per dwelling unit as S3,2S0 per unit, and the maximum park dedication amount per dwelling unit as $5,550 per unit. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of December, 2001. ATTEST: Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 2 of2 NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono Cit> Council docs hereby establish the minimum park dedication amount per d>^eUing unit as S3.250 per unit, and the maximum park dedication amount per dwelling unit as SS.SSO per unit Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono. Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of December, 2001. ATTEST: Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Page 2 of2 /ML Jk A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM PARK DEDICATION AMOUNTS FOR COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONED LAND WHEREAS, the City’s general park dedication requirement is 8% of the land being platted or subdivided; and WHEREAS, the Cit>''s park dedication ordinance calls for the dedication requirement to be roughly proportional to the projected impact of the proposed development on the Cit>''s park system; and WHEREAS, the City’s park dedication ordinance provides for the establishment of minimum and maximum park dedication amounts per residential dwelling unit; and WHEREAS, the City finds the employees of commercial/industrial developments make use of the City’s park system in ways similar to City' residents, particularly since the CitVs park system is focused on trails and natural areas; and WHEREAS, the City's park dedication ordinance ties the commcrcial/industrial park dedication requirement to the residential park dedication requirement by determining the number of commercial/industrial emplo>'ees that is equivalent to a residential dwelling unit in erms of impact on the City’s park system; and WHEREAS, the City has established a minimum park dedication amount per residential dwelling unit as S3,2S0 per unit, and a maximum park dedication amount per dwelling unit os $5,550 per unit; and WHEREAS, the City finds that ten employees are equivalent to one reside ,^al dw-elling unit in terms of impact on the park sy’stem; and WHEREAS, the City finds that the average number of employees accommodated by commercial/industrial zoned land is 25 employees per acre; and Page 1 of 2 WHFRE AS, the City finds that one acre of commercial/industrial land has on impact on the park system equivalent to that of 2.5 residential dwelling units; and WHEREAS, the equivalent minimum and maximum park dedication amounts for commercial/industrial property would be 2.5 x $3,250 - $8,125 per acre and 2.5 x $5,550 = $13,875 per acre respectively. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVXD that the Orono City Council does hereby establish the minimum park dedication amount for commercial/industrial zoned land as $8,125 per acre, and the maximum park dedication amount as $13,875 per acre. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10th day of December, 2001. ATTEST* Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Lindas. Vee, City Clerk Page 2 of2 DEC 1 0 2001 Gll Y Ur unoi^u REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 10.2001 ITEM NO: DcpailMCOt Approval^ Name Tom Kuehn Title Finance Director }^JL^ Admiiniitnitor Reviewed:Afeada Section: City Administrator's Report Item Deaeription: Appoint Auditor for Fiscal Year 2001 We have requested a cost estimate from the audit firm of Malloy. Kamowski. Radosevich A Company for performing the 2001 fiscal year audits. The estimated cost for the 2001 fiscal year audits, including the Minnesota legal compliance audit, and assistance with the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Program, is $22,730 excluding direct expenses. The total cost for the 2000 audit, related services, and direct expenses was $22,290. There are several activities the City is now involved in that we were not previously. The City now has a Tax Increment District, which will require specialized record keeping and reporting. The City is also using Community Block Grant Funds for affordable housing grants and loans. Last, but certainly not least, the City is involved in a joint fire hall project with the City of Long Lake. The audit of these activities will quite possibly require substantial additional time and expense from the audit staff, and therefore could result in significantly higher than estimated audit costs. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Council ^)pointment of the audit firm of Malloy, Kamowski, Radosevich A Co., P.A. to perform the required audits for the 2001 fiscal year records at an estimated cost of $22,730, excluding direct expenses. V \ DEC 1 C 2001 Oil y ur unuf^u REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 10,2001 ITEM NO: j 7 Departncnl Approval: y t Tom Kuehn Administrator Reviewed: Name Title Finance Director / A|(enda Section: City Administrator's Report Item Description: 2001 Interfund Transfers and Loan Payments Attachment: Schedule of 2001 Interfund Transfers and Loan Payments Each year the Council is requested to authorize transfer of monies between funds. These transactions fall into two categories: I.)Budgeted Transfers • Items designated in that year's budget when originally adopted for the purpose of providing support from one fund to another. 2.) Fund Obligations • (a) Payments from one fund to another to reimburse expenses incurred by one fund on behalf on another. This is generally for City portions of special assessments, or for equipment capital outlay. (b) Loan payments from one fuiui to another. Loans arc generally made to construction funds for the purp.**.e of pay ment of expenses incurred prior to the sale of bonds and the levying of special assessments. In addition certain loans are necessary to fimd major undertakings when the fund incurring the expense does not have adequate cash flow av ailable to complete the project, fhis would include such situations as the loan from the Community Investment Fund to the Water Operating Fund for the Navarre water plant rehabilitation project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of transfers as indicated on the attached schedule. SCHEDULE OF 2001 INTERFUND TRANSFERS AND LOAN PA YMFNTS PURPOSEFROM FUND TO FUND AMOUNT General Imp & Equip Outlay S 105,000 General Imp A Equip Outlay $ 8,400 Comniiinity Investment 1998 Public FaciUty Refunding Bond Debt $ 130,000 Water Operating Community Investment $ 53.870 capital equipment purchases, as budgeted. police records computer system. WaiMMTHMHItn debt service support ofHRA building bonds, as budgeted. Budgeted loan payment for Navarre water treatment plant rehabilitation project (Princ paid. S31.660; int paid. $22,210. Loan balance at 12/31/01. $380,020). DEC 1 0 2001 Cut Ur Un\yi«^ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 10,2001 ITEM NO: j J Title Finance Director Admiabtrator Reviewed:Agcada Scctioa: City Administrator's Report lleai DcMriptiM: r Authorization to disburse City funds for claims received Typically during the month of December the City has only one Council meeting. The second Council meeting, which falls on or near the Christmas holiday, has been canceled. We will have the next scheduled Council meeting on Monday. January 14, 2002. We therefore are requesting authorization to do a normal claims processing for the canceled Council meeting. This practice has been done in December each year with the Council then formally approving the claims at the first meeting in January of the following year. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to authorize the City Treasurer to disburse City funds in payment of claims received for the December 24* Council meeting, which has been canceled, and that such paid claims be presented for formal approval at the January 14.2002, Council meeting. k ••■cTINQ DEC 1 0 2001 ClIYUt'UHUlvO Department Approval: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: December 4,2001 Item No: / ^ Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: Stephany Good Chief of Police Item Description: Letter of Intent to Purchase - One (1) 2002 Ford Crown Victoria Squad Car Exhibits: None DISCUSSION I am requesting pennission to notify Superior Ford of our intent to purchase one 2002 Crown Victoria squad car. The purchase price of the squad car is $22,009.00. This car will be replacing Squad ^183 which has approx. 124,000 miles. This request is due to the restrictive number of vehicles being built and is necessary to secure a vehicle for the 2002 year. This vehicle is on the state bid system. COUNCIL ACTION REOUESTFD Approval of letter of intent to purchase to be sent to Superior Ford. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: December 4, 2001 hem No: / ^ Department Approval:Administrator Reviex^-ed:Agenda Section: Name: Tide: Stephany Good Chief of Police Item Description: Letter of Intent to Purchase Police Vehicle Exhibits:None DISCUSSION I am requesting permission to notify' Superior Ford of our intent to purchase one 2002 CroN^'n Victoria squad cor. The basic purchase price of the squad car is $22,009.00. As the manufacturer will be also installing the emergency lighting package, the price will be $23,186.00. This car will be replacing Squad <#183 which has approx. 124.000 miles. This request is due to the restrictive number of vehicles being built and is necessary to secure a vehicle for the 2002 year. COUNCIL ACTION RLQUKSTF.D Motion to approve letter of intent to purchase to be sent to Superior Ford. lo Folloe D^Murtment Proudly Serving Orono, Long Lake. Minnetonka Beach atid Spring Park Dedicated to Fairness, Service, Pride and Quality December 6.2001 Superior Ford 9700 56*‘ Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55442 Attn: Carol Hendrickson Dear Carol, This letter is to notify you of the City of Orono ’s intent to purchase one (I) 2002 Ford Croun Victoria that was discussed in our earlier meeting, for the bid price of 523,186.00. Delivery date will be c.xpected shortly after January ’ 1.2002. Our purchase order will follow, pending Council approval. Sinccrelv, Jeff Johnson. Fleet Coordinator for Chief Stephanj Good Ore*no Police Depanment JJ:sb Mailing Address: PO Box 86 • Ctysul Ba\. M.N 35323 • Building Address: 2730 Kelley Parkway • Orono. MN 55356 Polke 911 • Adininisiraiion 9.t2-249-4700 • Non-Emerjency 763-523-62 10 • Fax 952*476-.^028 E-mail: omnopdC^ ci.orono.mn.us • Website: hllp://ww\v ci.orono mn u% timO DEC 1 0 2001 OtlUNvJ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: December 4, 2001 Item No; ^ ^ Department Approval:Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Name: Title: Stephany Good Chief of Police Item Description; Letter of Intent to Purchase - One (1) 2002 Ford Expedition Exhibits: None DISCUSSION I am requesting permission to notify Morrie’s Ford of our intent to purchase one 2002 Ford Expedition. The vehicle uas budgeted for and is to augment the existing police fleet. The purchase price of the Expedition is S28,800.00. OfTicer Johnson (Fleet Coordinator for the police department) obtained several bids on similar vehicles, and the quoted price above is over S8,000 less than the next lowest quoted price. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Approval of letter of intent to purchase to be sent to Morrie’s Ford. December 4.2001 Morrie's Ford 13400 Wayzau Blvd. Minnetonka, MN SS305 Attn: Mary Crear and Aaron Velick Dear Mary and Aaron, This letter is to notify you of the City of Orono's intent to purchase a 2001 Ford Expedition that was discussed in our earlier meeting, reference number 9S-24-696000, for the bid price of $28,800.00. Delivery date will be expected shortly after January 1,2002. Our purchase order will follow, pending Council approval. Sincerely, Jeff Johnson, Fleet Coordinator for Chief Stephany Good Orono Police Department JJ:sb •»■««»• »»^trrtNO DEC 1 0 2001 Cll T ur UnUNU REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 6,2001 ITEM NO: ,2/ Dcpartmest Approval: Naai« RonMoorse Titk City Administrator Admiaistrator Reviewed:Agenda Scctioo: City Administrator's Report Item Description: Payment to LMCD for Additional Water Patrol Deputies The Council, at its meeting of September 25,2000, directed staff to indicate the City’s support for funding its share of the cost of additional Water Patrol Deputies in the amount of $5073.33. Through the support of the City, as well as most other cities around Lake Minnetonka, and the LMCD, the Hennepin County Water Patrol was able to add two Deputies during the busy boating months of2001. The Water Patrol has indicated the additional deputies were very beneficial to their efforts. The City has now received the invoice from the LMCD for the City’s share of the additional costs in the amount of $5073.33. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the payment of the invoice from the LMCD in the amount of $5073.33 as the City’s share of the costs of additional Water Patrol Deputies during tlie summer of mi : mcD FPK NO. : 74S9085 Nov/. 28 2BB1 8i:i9R1 P2 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18338 Minnetonka Btvd. Deephavan. MN 55391 (952)745-0789 November 28,2001 Water Patrol Invoice City of Oi Amount Payment for cooperative venture for 2001 Boating $5,073.33 Season (See Attachment One for further details) TOTAL DUE:$6,073.33 I CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT BILL FOR SEDGES RENDERED, AND THAT NO PART OF THIS BILL HAS Dated: November 28.2001 Gr6^. Exec. Dir. 1 I>KE WNNETOMU CONSeWAIION DOTmCT aOM WATER PATROL PROPOSAL ANALYSIS OF MEMBER CITES VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS ATTACHMENT ONE r CTTYOrMrsI Exc«Mor<1) GfMiMnood (2) ItM TAXABLE MAMCET VALUES 449.674,500 140.506.400 07.865.600 im NET TAX PERCENTAOEOF MEMBER CITY CAPACITY TOTAL NET TAX SHARE CAPACITY ($20,000) CITY SNARE (IIT.liT) 6.095.119 2,416,997 1.520.312 7.39% 2.64% 1.63% U17.13 $791.66 $468.86 $1,270.12 $453.74 $260.15 4,392.402.000 84.744.523 20.00%$6,000.00 $3,437.40 Sii102.974.600 1.630.381 1.75%$524.25 $300.77 •• MkiiMfrtBli (4)458,062.000 6,704.659 7.10%$2,155.89 $1,235.75 i Wound (2)514.586.400 7.145.622 7.06%$2,207.68 $1,316.52 Ofoiio(2)1.018,521.300 15.777.890 16.01%$5.073 33 $2,006.32 Stiofowood (2)678,345.400 10.218.346 10.95%$3,285.72 $1,881.08 Spring Parlt (1)82.949.800 1,582.437 1.70%$506.83 $262.18 u Tonka Bay <2)106.390.100 3.001.106 3.22%$065.01 $553.42 li Vicloria(l)293.500.300 4,302.369 4.61%$1,383.43 $702.32 Q1 Wfaynli(l)602.922,700 11.563,812 12.39%$3,718.36 $2,120.47 3 woodland (21 116,595.600 1.834.386 1.97%$589.65 $338.58 REQUEST FOR COUNat ACTION DATE; IVccmhcr X 2001 ITEM NO: J!,X Dcpartmcat Approval: Name Lin Vcc Tilk City Clcri Adniaistrator Rnirocd:Agenda Section: C'il> Adminislmlor's KcpiHl Item Deicriptioo: Council Unison to Park C'ommission and Planning C'ommission Meetings in ___________________2002____________________________________________________________ The following is a propoicd schedule for Council Member attendance at the monthly Park Commission and Planning Commission meetings during 2002. SCHEDULE PARK COMMISSION Mcvliiig Dale Repmeaialbe January 7. 2002 Dob Sonsevcrc l-'cbTuary 4 Jim White March 4 Mayor I’eteiVHi April 1 Richard Klint May 6 Jay Ny gard June 3 Dob Sansevere July 1 Jim White AuguU 5 Mayor Peterson September 3 (Tuesday) Rkhvd Flint October 7 Jay Nygard November 4 Dob S.invcvere PLANNING COMMISSION Mcctiag Dale Rcprrtcnlaihc January 22.2002 (Tuesday) Richard Flint February lU (Tuesday) Jim W hite March 18 Mayor Peterson April 15 Jay Nygard May 20 Doh Sansevere June 17 Richard Flint Juh 15 Jim White August IQ Mayor Peterson SqMcmber 16 Jay Nygard October 21 Dob Sansevere November 18 Richard F lint COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve schedule for Council attendance at the Pork Commission and Planning Commission meetings during 2002. UMwa«f4 DEC 1 0 2001 Cm r or onuinj REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 6,2001 ITEM NO: Department Approval: Name Ron Moorse TMc City Administrator Admiabtrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: City Administra.or's Report Item Dcicriplion: Scheduling of Council Wofkscssions The Council wants to meet in a joint worksession with the Planning Commission to discuss structural coverage regulations, home occupation regulations, and other current issues. In addition, there arc a number of items to be addressed in a separate council worksession. To assist in selecting a date and time for a Joint worksession, both Council and Planning Commission members were provided with a calendar of potential dates and times. It appears the best times for the Planning Commission members are: 8:00 a.m. on December 18,19, and 20. and 5:30 p.m. on Thursday, December 20. It appears the best time for the Council is 5:30 p.m. on Thursday. December 20. It is important that the Council selects worksession dates at the December 10 meeting, so that calendars can be finalized. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to select a date and time for the joint Council/Planning Commission worksession. Motion to select a date and time for a Council w orksession. OfC 1 0 2001 UI r ur OHUNO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 4.2001 ITEM NO: Dcpartamil Appravil: NaiM LinVe« THk Citv Cleft Adanistrator Rokwed: Ilea Dcfcriplion: List of Licenses for (u^cil Ai AgemU Scetka: LKcn«n il Approval i KENNEL LICENSE Robert K. Sonsevere 745 Orchard Park Road LIQUOR LICENSES On Sale 3.2 Beer Off Sale 3.2 Beer Ond^OrrSale3JBeer Lakeview Golf ofOrono, Inc. 405 North Arm Drive Orono Golf Course 265 Orono Orchard Road South O'Sullivan's 2420 Shady wood Road O'Sullivan's II 3340 Shoreline Drive Navarre Lanes 3435 Shoreline Drive ONE DAY GAMBLING - RESOLUTION Orono PTO Mid Winter Fun Fest Raffle - Orono Middle School Saturday. February 2. 2002 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny the above listed license(s). Date:November 20,2001 To:Lin Vee. City Clerk From:Stephany Good, Chief of Police Re: 4 Liquor License I have reviewed the renewal application for an On Sale 3.2 malt liquor license for the Lakevicw Galf Co«nc. When reviewing the files contained within the Orono Police Department, no liquor law violations were found. l'«irmNu. 133- ■»- «" »»»•* J4 4M> Uy IT r^wliK 1p» II RETAIL "ON SALE" ^te of Ainneoata. CDUvn' or......Cit«.or .... , To Iho ..P.M/. .Co-ijeM..............of lh«............C|ty ...................©f.......9r?P®... .........................................................................................Stale of Minnceoia: Crant luiaall Vankstarn hmrvby tpfL . t»P.. fur a Mnntao for Uw trnrn of............w .................................................................... fn>m thm......'*................................tUyaf............................................fmr............mmH At RetaU Only, 34 Malt Liquor* m Um mmm are OaOnmi by law. tar wiwiwye Bn -Otr Uiaaa certain prandam In Urn.................................. ..................................Pl«r..........................of.................................................................... dbirHIiMl aa Mow. UrwU;............................................................................................................................................... LAkaalaw Coif of Orono, Inc. 40) North Am Orlva af iWiicfi place aald appUcanl... .opcraie. 0. tlw bualneaa of..............pMtU U. Koif. . an<f m iltal oiirf rapfmenl.f. .and alalo.9. .aa foUowa: Tfial aald a/tpUcanl...........M. .4.......................dtUen ... .of llte Untied Sialea; of gttttd moral cfiaradcr ami repnlK ami hare........allalnetl llw age of it yeara; that . .I.tjcniiriciur... .of tho oalabHahntenl frtr tvhkii Ihe llcenaa oHI be Uaoed If llila appliraiian la granted. Thai nn mamifaitiiivr of aurli noihlnloiirallng mall Ikjuttra haa any oirnerahip. In whubi or In pari. In aaki buaincaa of aakl afiitlkanl. . .or any hilrrrsl lhal aald appllcanl... .make. ■. .Ihia a/ipHeaiian piiraoant and aub/ect to all llie lawa of Ilia Stale of Mktneaola ami Ihe onlinancea ami ivgulallona of t.tkl ......................P.l Ij'....................................................... appUcoldaIhereia^ whkiiareharvbymadeaparlhereof.andharebyaffee.S..loala>meandoba!ylho$aam Each appUcanl further aiaian lhal by Ihe commencement of buaineaa and by July I of each auccerding year aakl appUconl wm hare paid Ihe redaral Special Occupational Taa to the Buieeu of Akohol. Ibbacto and nroamu fur a retail dealer. Oalrd AppUcanJ. M. AiMrtm ... If.Q.. /i,. .V»V.<r.. A»l% .W... ...................... Dale:November 30,2001 To:Lin Vee, City Clerk From:Stephany Good, Chief of Poli( Re:Liquor License I have reviewed the appUcadon for the annual renewal of the On Sale License for 3.2 Malt Liquor for the Orono Golf Course. No liquor law violations have been noted and 1 have no objection to the issuance of this license. RETAIL "ON SALE" IMate of Jlbiiicoata, oouifTycir...'?*?prf.‘."...................... ......,qi?r................or O" To U m... Clt.I.CoRiicll ..........of III®..............mx............of .........OlTr?............ ..............................................................................state of Mlnncoola: .......................................................................................................................... iMTote lyifOL I rft.. for « teanw for Uw lorai of................???. Jf .......................................... foom llm...,XUfl................................dajrof..........fPJmn......................r«r ...........,iot At lleteil Only, 3^ Mall Llquoro MtfMomarvilMliMii/lfrter.foroDnauiiyilfoo ■tWrfiNMerorUfopramtasfotfw........................ .......................................................................................of .................Orrm....................................................... tkKribui «■ IMmra, MmHI:............................................................................................. Onmo Coif Couroo 26S OroMO Orrhiird Rood South ol irfiMi pte» Mhf sfiiMautt... .ofionMo. A .Uw Inu Iimm of ... PMoMImI.RPlf. . •in ! to Uwi omf nywoMml.f. .ond maw.. 9.a$ MI owk Thai aaU apiMkmnl...........<!.............................drlmi... .of tfio ttnttal SMca; of good ntond dutracter and rofNilW and ham..........ollaW liw ^ of 21 yoant Utal Ron SttffenhAfiAn .l^iriMor. ...of Uw aalabUahnwnt for whkh Uw Ikanae wW to touod If UiU application U granted. tTuI no manufaelurar of such non-IntoaleaUng malt ttquan hat any ownrrdUp. In whole or In part. In mdd bualnaaa of aaki a/iplleant----or any Intomi i/ionda Tfiol aald ap/dlemtl-----ntaka. R. .Ihh apfdlrallon fMmuant and miblect to all the lawa of Uw Stale of Slkmeaola attd Uw onllnaneea and mguUtlona of aald..................f Jktjt........................................................... appUcaUloUwnnn, whMi are hendw made a pan hereof, and herd,y agree. P. .toobaermandobeytlwaanwi each mppUcani furtiwr aiaiee Uwl by Uw cemrtwrwemetu of bualneaa and hy Jufy t of each aucceedlld year aak! appUeam trill hare paid Uw rederal Special Occupational Tat to Uw Outvaa af Akohai Tobacco atal nrrmntut for a retail derder. UJK Atklrrm . Date:November 20,2001 To:Lin Vee. City Clerk From:Stephany Good, Chief of Police Re:Liquor License I have reviewed the renewal application for an Off Sale 3.2 beer license for O’Sullivans. Both locations of 2420 Shadywood and 3340 Shoreline Drive were checked when reviewing the files contained within the Orono Police Department. A liquor law violation was noted that occurred on October 26. 2001 in which liquor was sold to a minor. Charges are pending at this time. 1 UIMIJoot tmrn I uti—mfiiMoi lt£1AJL*^FFSALir* 3catc of illinncsota, CmtHf ^ H«nn>pln To «>»* City Council City Orono ..of the.city Orono .Stale of Minnesota: John N. O'Sullivan ktnikf aw Kls a -------Jbr a Utmujm Hu Itrm Y—JBIlf ytar fnm Ikt___________________________4ay Y-___.tonfl In Origiml Padiates Only 32 Malt Lisuors. Of Ik0 Mtmt art itfirntd *y Um, J9t t0m$0mptl0m -OFF- Ihair ttrt0im prtmiiti im i*#„ ......., , City Y Orono d0$€nk0duj0t(0mt, in-arir.*. O'Sullivann 2420 Shadyvood Hoad «i wki€h pi0€0 t0U 0ppUcmmt.....^f0t0..A.^.„. tht kmstmtu •/.----A«RRlfcw7.fip.ny.r.n‘«n?.«. J.!lP.r«. »md 10 tkmt rad rrf rrira/....a.aad tfafr...!. ai /0II0W1: Tkmt tmU 0ppttt00f..........ia..a........................n'fitra........a/ lAr Vmitti Slain; 0/ frod moral tkarotUr Md npmu: and fta.—allaiMrdiar afr a/2/ yean; iaBl..jDha.O.’Sulll.y«c..ia..............proprittor......ojtht tttmkihkmtni/0r mkitk tkt Hctatt trill kr iiiard (ftkii ay^/ical/aa It grooitd. Thai laid opplUool......mak*..M ..ihit opplitolioo pmrtuoml and smkjtel la 0II Ikt lowi of tkt Slair of M/aariala aad llir ordimtmtt* and rtgolaliomt ofttid..............Ci.tJT...........................opplitokit Iktrtio, mkitk art anrhy Madr a port kertof. aad kertkp agrte k-io okiertt aad aftry l*r laair; ■•«••••aa«a«a»*aa*a«aaa Fotk opplitomi fmrtktr Main Ihal. hr it aal aaar ihr Aa/drr a/, aar *ai_ *r modt tpptUolioo far, mar dan_ kt imumd la aiair oppUtoUam for a frdrra/ ffrial/ DtoUr’t kpttiol lot tiomp for ikt loto of imlositalittg ligmar. Doled.,.lltf if 2cr t •aa*aa«»««»*»a«^^ *^U c t. 1%‘Frsy ____ Applit F.O. Addren...fP...?..f:X.Af.............. -■A. met —mffMnmnatiM nwiim RETAIL **OFF SALT* 3cacc omunncsoca. HcoBipln Cltv ^jf Orotio To tho city Council -of the-city Orono -State of MiiuietoU: John H. O'SuIllv.in fimtOf___ULUt- .^•tktmujtrlkiltrm n/L.ont VT, In Oriiinri PKfcers Only JJ Malt Uquon, a$ tht tamt an itftmti *y lam, Jar taataatfUan "Orf” tkata tartaia fnathat im _________Clta at Orono 4aatrtka4 aaJaOamt, !»•■><(.*- O'Sulllvami 3340 Shoroltno Oriv* at mklek yfarr uU af^icaat...aftnia..A.— Ika kmiiaau af.-----lttSSAinil/.f.SnXSn‘r.nF*-**Sr.f. amd la Ikal aad npniaat..»^.aad ilata.M... at faltami: Thai taU a^Ueaal......................................„..tMiam------a/ika Vallad Stalat; a/gaad ataral tkarattar amd repuia; aad ka .....atuimti ikt aga a/21 faan; ikal ......Joba.O/.SliXLUAD-ia-........pnprtalar....„af Ika aUaklitkmaal for mkitk Ika litaata mill ka htaad if lUi appliaaiiao it graaud. Tkal tali applltami.....maka..K...lklt applitaliaa panaaat aad takjatl la all Ika lamt of Ika Slaia of kllmaaiola ami tka ardiaaaeat amd rtgalaiioat oftaid-----------City..-.....................appikakla ikaralo, mkitk an kankf atada a port ktraof, and karakj agna..a..la aktarra aad akap Ika taaia: Batk apphcami forikar tioiai lkai_ ka it mot nam ika koldtr of, aar kai_ ka mada applintioa for, aor doat_ ka imiaad lo moka applitolioa for a Fadarot kiioil Daalar't Spatial lot tiamp for Ika tala af Imlaxitallag ligmar. Daltd..„,....alLcI taar..UV ---------- ------___________________________ ^ Applltaal,. r.O. Addratt....£P..MX„kC...................... _______ Date:November 20,2001 To:Lin Vee, City Clerk From:Stephany Good, Chief of Polic( Re:Liquor License I have reviewed the renewal application for an On and Off Sale 3.2 license for the Navarre Lancs. When reviewing the files contained within the Orono Police Department, no violations were found involving liquor law. fimm Hm. IH . i» »ifca RETAIL "ON SALE" (&tote of 4linD(Bota, COUNTT O'*.... PWWfO............................. To Um ... .Ct». P.'M.n.ciU...........of Um .................Cl t;r.............Off............9?®?®. _ pit/.......................gf____9.<’.®®®......... ..............Slate of Mlnneoola: DanUl Scharvtn htmbty mpiM, AM ..fora ttemtte far Um tarm ot.........???. Tf®.'.......................................................................... rram Iho ... .IU»*..............................................tUyoT...........................................................fOir................tornU At Helall Only# 3Jt Molt Liquors «• Um Muue Mnt detbmtl by fair, fur ru$uumiMion tJfr ihtme itrtmima In Um.................................... ...........................cu/...........................of.............o.*;*;®®......................................... 1 m faknrx to-mU;....................................................................................................................................... Navarra Laaaa SOOfaShoralliM Drive al %rhktt pUn aM ------apermie.t. .Um buabmmaf.........bovllns. Xonaa. mnd lo tlml end rcpremni. A .and MaiaO.. .aa faOowa: Ttml aakl appUcunI.............1(. a......................cllUm------of Um I'rWJod Alaloa, of good moral diaractci* and rcfMilrv and haw...........atiainvd Um ago id 21 yoann Uu$t .QavlfX. . .fHO§mk ’lar.., .ofUiO oalmbllahmotil for nlUvh Um llcmue nW Im faiurd If UUi applicallon la granicd. Thai IM mamifaduror of auch iion-lnluticaling mall llquora haa any onmcrahlp. In irhulo or In part, bl aaU buabmaa of aaU appllcani-----or any IniorvU ihcrvln; Thai aakf ap$tHeanl-----nulir. .q ififa apidk aikHi iniruiani and lu aU Itm lawn of Um 94alo at AUmmaolm and Um anlltuumea and reguLniona of aakl........city.......................................................................... appUcoUmUmrola.whlrharmlmrobymadoaparllmraof.andlmrebyagroe.*..loobaerwandoboytlmaanmi Eadi apidloanl turlhor atalrn lhal by Um tomnmm'pmoni of bualimaa and by July I of oach aucveodiiqf year aaid applicani will haw paid Urn flpdoral Spaepd OccupaUoiuU Taa lo Um bureau of Alcohol. Tobacco and nroarma for a rolall doalor. y/rM.&Lt..,. PAAddrom, * ^ iMi RETAIL **OfF SALT* ;5catc ormuDCBota, Cmmiftf.Oroao To iW Cttr CooiKll -of tbc-Orooo -Stole of MionooU: Danl*l Sch«rv«n out year JamiaryA—, ---------!!____ 1« Orii^Mi roAacn (My 3J Mall li^Mn, a< r*« «aai« mr« */ lam, far caaiaMffiaa "OFF" Ikait etrtaim prtmhti im ikt.. ------------------------------------------ dnerika^ai/aMamt, _______ Navarra Lanva JOOO ShortlliM Drive at mkl€» ptmta aati m^pUtaat,—afvrarv-A ------tkt kmsiant aad la Ikat ta^ rr^r«i#ar..B-aaW rfafr.a... at/allami: Tkal tmid afplUamI........iH. ..................^..tiilua........aflkt Vailtd Sialet; af taa4 maral tkaratUr ami rtpalt! ami ka...n.Malmti ika agt af 21 ftan; ....................praprieiar.__of iht ailakHikiatmt far mkUk Ikt Uttmtt milt ke Ittmei l/ikit aji^nrariM i$ gramlei. Tkal laii appUtamt ......makt,.»...lkit applicallam pmnmaml ami tmkjttl la all Ike laws af Ikt Slalt af tfiaariafa aai ike antiaaarri aai ngaloiiaai afiaii .......r.l.tx..................................applitakit Ihtrela, mkttk art ktftkf made a pari ktttaf, ami ktrtkj agttt.X..ta aAirfre aad oktj ikt laaie: "libM Kmek applitaal farther iialet lkal_ ke It mat mow ike kaUer ->f. mar kat _ ke maJt apphtauaa far, mar iaei_ ka laltmi la make apptitaHma far a Federal HtlaU Dealer't Spttial lot iiaaip for ike tale af lalaaitaliag ligmar. Dated..//-/< KENNEL UCENSE APPLICATION Effective January 1.200_2^ December 31.200^ PronefiYAddfCM:'?/.^ (iudiiik city and zip) Mailing Address (if different): ^ Phone: (home) * 1*^7 (work) RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Fee: $25.00 (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:__ (over 6 mooths of age) * ^ /\ 0>IL- '3’r'/’- c?l -li Principal Breed:__________j ^ . Purpose for more than 2 does: ' Dogs normally kept: j^y^inside____^kennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Fee: $150.00 (payment must accompany application) Name of Business:_________________ Business Activities: (example: boardins, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: _______________________________ After Hours Contact: (name) (phone)_ Dog runs/exercise areas are:____inside___^outside__^th The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and docs not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the utulersigned hereby grants the City permission to Inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions u;.poscd Jjy-lhe^iiy Council as part of any kennel license approval. //' ^7-^/ Applicant Date Dott //’Z? A Date: To: From: Re: December 5,2001 LinVee, City Clerk Siephany Good, Chief of Police Gambling Permit I have reviewed the application submitted by the Orono PTO for the Mid Winter Fun Fest Raflle. This event is scheduled for February 2,2002 at the Orono Middle School. As this is an annual e\ ent, a review of past records contained within the Police Department has been made. No problems were found, and I have no objection to the issuance of this permit. FROM : MPPYS'ilTH OeC>O<i-20fll lZ:4a PH>€ NO. ; 9524710900 GflrtELlNQ CWTO. BC*WO Dec. 04 2001 04:27PM P2 6516394073 P.e2/Oe Mkwaota Lmi/M OmnbHng LOaao • Application for Exwnpt PannIt Fm*$26 Orpaninlfon 9^Sr353anrSw biteiTn<<on TS N«PiU, ChaliMa. Cate. X- Sau<1'^-ai -eBi Nm« of GhW meulfM ollcw (CEO) nurama /8655<p •Ka~fKi LmnvTM 'flu! |rve»MT\ Nirmcf twBurar FMram LMirwnt llg ryp« of Nonprofit Organiiatlon Onifiqf U€n»€pln OQfOnt phen« numOtr of CCO «JS2- 4TJ»-2W ‘/ O^^fimaphonimaiOwof Chtek th« box that but i:JKrt;as iiour (wpanbalton: □ Frolamai □^Ralgtoua CJ VHran ISTothirnappfoflorgtrizaeon Chaoh tt»box tM tndleatat lypa of proof your er^baSon attxhad to thb app3h:aton: JSTIMI Mtar Indicaling Inoomo Inaaiampt atalus O C«1M» of Oood Stantfng ton «tia Mkinona facrotary at Stais'i Offloe O A diarlar showvbg you «o an affiMi cf a parant nonprofit orsanizatien CJ Proof pro>teuiiy tuenKad and cn fie oth tia Gambt>g Control Beard Oambllnfl PromlOBo InfOmiaM wrSSeTvIhtSgKHniertS^Nifroefp ion I MhMO gamMnf tefivfiy wd be eenduAM {fv mlfea, Git fa cte where tt# draMng take pUeaf D no W \ kiima (do not UM PO ho) W£> A). 0><1 U)Aa sw47pcede SS33^ Cete<i) of ecthrty Cbr raOu. hidoto mo oato ef tto d-awtig} ^eU 1, looZ. Couiuy VienrKpIn diosk mo bex or Mtt mocate mo type orgimeano otafly vour aravbaion wu 00 conducftig Q 1ln«o l3W8ooteitnprtio*iTaynoroMd 112^00) Q *Po<l(ttwinoafi 0*Pi*Ti6o n^teboordo fetibrMrtmfmeoooemaaoofnumbo cttdwed tom a teonaod debater. TMs forni wiB be mode noUobto In afienaTNe formal 0 o. brne prim. 8<alt) upon focwocl T>o knfcnRBlDn rvqjcsmd en mo torm (or^ ory oftoGhirono) wi M uotd'by Cio OanbUrg Control loord (Beore) «i ootom^ you* ewattadans to be invoveO bi ie«M fiomblrg oem«m ki Me'nooa'a. You f-ovo »o rtsht to tonjuo ■.FPVmo rdonraCen raouaetod: rKyrmer, t yeu tebJi to mppV MO toternaSon. me Bca-d may rtot bo oM to ectermire yeu cuot^ceflone end. aso eonooqueneo, ray refUiotoom-oyoioofmA. )TyBUM.apV mo ffctTTaflon roquested. mo Boa*d w9 to otto to procott your oppkaton. Yeur norra oM aid yovr orgirtufion’o ramo and odditooeifba pubic Mmolon whin ivcclad by ate Beoid. Al d-o olhor totomwmin d>oi yeu pnnlde w9 be prluahi doti ebout you urano Booro bouet you penniL When »e Beard (mum raur petml ol of mo sdermadeh m-at ycu no^ prsVdod to me Board to tie prosoeo of oppiymp tor you panrLtwItaoome pubic. If dte Board doao net ierua you a pormN, o3 ma nfEimafen yeu have provided to mo prcceu cf epplytTB fer a penM rtrrotoo pmau. odm mo •eapflen td you noma •rd youenEORtaSen’etaraand 0S900O whEh wl rvnato pubic. Pitvtogttoa about you ofooiiomMe erdym mawawrf: Board mantotnTL. Bovd whoeo wc H i aoaigruTwrt laawbad tftot may have occoss b m« tofonraaBn; ma Mtonaaou OaoartnantefPutxk aatoty; mo Mhnooota Attomoy OonoraC me Mhncooto Cerrmiooienora ef Admtototoadorv Pltonca. end Rovoroic; ho ittonooaa tegloMve Aurnor. RflOnr^ told totorrabena garnabip n«ultoory oportdae; anyeno pureumt lo eoud eilor emer Irdividuali ord aponclee mat ora •ptdficaly ouCMibod by tfba or hdord lM> to favo aeooM to mo totoartoeon; bAIAmli «)d oMTclN tor wfikn toa or iBBal ofdor oumoita a f>«w UM or ahartog or totoTTOflOon ofha mn NoOoo woe glWK and ortyora wsn yeu cortoMt A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF ORONO PTO FOR A ONE DAY OFF-SITE GAMBLING PERMIT WHEREAS, the Orono PTO is licensed to conduct lawful gambling acti\ities; and WHEREAS, the Orono PTO has proposed to conduct a one day olT-site gambling activity (rafne) as part of its annual Mid Winter Fun Fest at the Orono Middle School on February 2.2002;and WHEREAS, the Orono PTO is required to obtain approval of the ofT-site gambling activity from the city in which the activity will occur. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Orono City Council does hereby approve the application of the Orono PTO to conduct a one day off-site gambling activity (raffle) at the Orono Middle School on February 2,2002. 2001. Adopted at a regular meeting of the Orono City Council this 10th day of December, ATTEST:Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Lindas. Vee, City Clerk us<vau>MMPToe:Page 1 of I cmroFORONO check register 12m«1 1003 AM Pagai DEC 1 0 2001 nuiV'*^Pat ChKii Chock Nunibar Einployw Nmm Pitod Amount Date dwell Mama 0S0S12 PETERSON. BARBARA 12 832322 12/KV01 Outstanding 0S0S13 M00R8E. RONALD J.12 8 <631 12/1001 Outstanding 080614 SAN8EVERE, ROBERT K.12 S260 36 12/10«1 OutstanUng 060615 FLINT, RICHARD 12 S26036 12/1001 Oulstandtag 080516 NVQARD.JAY 12 8269 36 12/10/01 Oulatandbig 050817 WHITE, JAMES M 12 8260 36 81.746 97 12/106)1 Outstandwg FILTER: ((year=‘2001' and [pay period] in (12))) and [pay group] in ('02') CITYOFORONO check register 12AMrai 1047 AM P«0«1 Pwted CA ka OMCttMkI oi. 080407 0S04M 080800 080501 080803 080804 080808 080800 080810 080511 ANOEMON.BRUCCL aoms. SCOTT w CORMCK. JAMES L OEMBOUSKI. JAVC ERICKSOM, KURT R FARNIOK. CORREY L FI8CHENICH. OANT FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K JOHNSON. BRADLEY P JOHNSON. JEFFREY MCNALLY. STEVEN A MCMCHOLS. OAVIO L 8CHOENHOFF. JOHN B TOMCHECX. LAWRENCE F TOMCZYK.MARKW WITTKE, ANTHONY A 241 24 1 241 241 24 1 24 1 24 1 24 1 241 24 1 24 1 241 241 241 24 1 24 1 11.70158 8122 32 81.647 62 81.61806 8620 91 81.760 52 81.452 51 81.434 36 81.742 40 802335 8171 25 8657 40 81.137 56 81.520 48 $1.750 26 $1.187 69 12/1«1 12/1AI1 12/1AM OuMandNo 12/1/01 OuNtandMo 12/1/01 Outstandmo 12/1/01 OuNlandmo 12/1/01 Outstanding 12/1/01 OutstandMig 12/1/01 OutstandMg 12/1/01 Outatandkig 12/14)1 12/14)1 12/14)1 Oulstandng 12/1411 Oidstandng 12/1/01 Outstanding 12/1411 OuWandmg $19,569^ FILTER: ((year»'2001‘ and [pay pariod] in (24.1))) and [pay group] in fOV) m CITY OF ORONO Chack Detail Ragistor VWMfHMdiy. Nov«mt)«r 28.2001 Pag* 1 of 1 Chock #ml Invotc* Cotnmont 10100 PrOiMry Cash * Paid Chk« 072428 11/28/0' CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION G 101-21711Credit Union S7.37400 SAVINGS Wm A TRANSFERRED Total CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION S7.374 00 PaidChMI 072420 11/28A)1 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES G 101-21701Federal Withholding S11.291 08 FEDERAL W/H G 101-21703 FICA Tax WHMwMing S4.30084 FICA & MEDICARE W/H G 101-21703 FICA Tax Withholding $4.300 84 FICA A MEOCR CITY SHARE Tolal FOIST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKES S19.893 66 Paid Chki 072430 11/28KI1 ICaU RETIREMENT TRUST-487 G 101-21705 To nn DEFERRED COMP tal ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 90UU uu S300 00 Paid ChMI 072431 11/28A)1 LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE G 101-21707Union Due*S528 00 UNION DUES Total LAW ENFORCMENT LABOR SERVICE $528 00 Paid Chk# 072432 1 l/28A)1 MN DEPT OF REVENUE G 101-21702Stale Withholding $4.162 07 STATE TAX W7H ToUl MN DEPT OF REVENUE $4.16207 Paid Chk« 072433 11/28/01 ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEE/CUST G 101-21705Other Retiremeni $1.954 68 MN STATE RETIREMENT Total ORCHARD TRUST CO. TRUSTEEA;U8T $1.954 68 PaldCiikt 072434 11/28A)1 PEBSCOKieRA G 101-21705Other Rahrement $8 40 OBRA DEFERRED COMP Total PEBSCOIOBRA $6 40 Paid Chki 072435 11/28A)l PEBSCOOJS CONF OF MAYORS G 101-21705Other Retirement $2,497 00 USCM - ENTITY 2339 Total PEBSCOOISCOMF OF MAYORS $2,497 00 Paid Chki 072436 11/28/01 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT G 101-21704PERA $6.703 56 PERA CITY SHARE G 101-21704PERA $5.136 88 PERA EMPLOYEE W/H Total PUBUC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT $11.840 44 Paid Chki 072437 11/28d)1 UNITED WAY G 101-21708United Way $24 00 CHARITY DONATIONS Total UNITED WAY $2400 Paiddhki 072438 11/28«1 WISCONSIN SCTF G 101-21712ether Oeduchons $184 62 JOHNSON i 0002756898 Total WISCONSIN SCTF $164 62 10100 Primary Cash $48.766 87 71 dwell Numlwr EmiilovM Nwiw 090442 090443 090449 090440 090447 090440 090449 090490 090491 090492 090493 090494 090499 090490 090497 090450 090459 090400 090401 090402 090403 090404 090407 090408 090409 090470 090471 090472 090473 090474 090479 090470 050477 090470 090479 090480 090401 090487 090483 090404 090409 090408 Dooac, RACHEL M JOHNSOK MARY ANN LE8KINEN. OCNOE M MOORSE. RONALD J VEE.UNOAS KUEHN. THOMAS M OLSON. RONALD J PETTrr, SANDRA K ANDERSON. BRUCE L BOBZIEN. SUE A^ BORIS. SCOTT W BUDIO. STACIE M CARLSON MICHAEL B CORMCK. JAMES L DEMBOUSKI. JAYC ERICKSON. KURT R FARNIOK. CORREY L FISCHENICH.OANT FISCHER. CHRISTOPHER K 0000. STEPHANY R HENDRICKS RONALD J JOHNSON. BRADLEY P JOHNSON. JEFFREY MADSON. ADRIENNE M MCNALLY. STEVEN A. MCNICHOLS. DAVID L MOROMCZYNSKI. JAMES PERSELL. WILLIAM R SCHOENHOFF. JOHN B TOMCHECK. LAWRENCE F TOMCZYK.MARKW W1TTKE. ANTHONY A ARNESON. JOSHUA A LEE. JOSEPH P BOLTERMAN. MATTHEW A BOTTENBERO. WENDY C DAVIS. MARC L OAFFRON, MICHAEL P. OAPPA. GREGORY A MEYER. WILLIAM C OMAN. LYLE E WEINBERGER, PAUL E BRMKHAUS.JOHNF. DE8AERE. DONALD L GREOO:<Y. JAMES D. CITYOFORONO check register Pay dwek Clwclt Pwlod Amount DM* dwek SMIUi 24 9977 00 24 909420 11/28K)1 Oulatamkna 24 9887 00 11/2801 24 91.701 10 11/28AM OutatMdk^ 24 91.270 14 11/284)1 Oulatwidkig 24 91.07324 11/20/01 Outstandwo 24 930 32 11/284)1 OuWandlng 24 9404 34 11/28101 OuMandMo 24 9784 08 11/204)1 OuMantfno 24 9707 80 11/28/01 OuNtandlng 24 91.403 39 11/204)1 OuNtanefeng 24 9704 41 11/284)1 OuHMndHo 24 930097 11/204)1 OutMwdMg 24 91.392 09 11/284)1 OuMwtdHg 24 91.42189 11/284)1 Outatandng 24 91.40000 11/284)1 Outatandno 24 92 124 49 11/28/01 Outslandmo 24 91.390 89 11/28/01 Oulatandino 24 91.923 14 11/284)1 Outstanding 24 92.000 81 11/204)1 Outalandmg 24 91.01303 11/204)1 Outalandno 24 91 091 79 11/284)1 OuMandMg 24 9240 20 11/284)1 OiiMandino 24 9781 11 11/284)1 Outatandmg 24 91.790 87 11/284)1 Outatandng 24 9820 92 11/284)1 Outatandng 24 91.729 91 11/284)1 Outatandng 24 9792 24 11/284)1 OutsUndng 24 91.390 99 11/20/01 Outatandng 24 9322 37 11/204)1 Outstanding 24 91 340 43 11/284)1 Oulstanding 24 91 387 49 11/284)1 Outatandng 24 9070 38 11/284)1 Outatwidng 24 9247 J9 11/204)1 Outatandng 24 9977 04 11/284)1 Outatandng 24 91.004 79 11/284)1 Outatandng 24 91.264 04 11/284)1 Outatandng 24 91.209.92 11/204)1 OutsUndng 24 91.049 69 11/284)1 Outatandng 24 9893 37 11/204)1 Outatandng 24 937 85 11/284)1 Outatandng 24 91.30729 11/284)1 Outatandng 24 91.23192 11/204)1 Outatandng 24 9828 00 11/284)1 Outatandng 24 91.07300 11/284)1 Outatandng 11/37«1 10 57 AM Pagal cmroFOROMO check register 11/37/01 10S7MI Pa0»3 Pwtotf Chwk MtCtaclll OSOM7 »MN8EN. STEVEN 0604M OeERAIONER SCOTT O 0604M O0WOI.RANDVL 0604M PAUMEROraEGORVA. 060491 RATHBUN, BARRY J 060492 8KREEN.0ALES 060493 ABRAHAMSON.FREOW. 060494 ROSS. JOHN A. 060496 STEFFENHAOEN, RONALD 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 9992 45 S664 00 S97147 6799 92 11.05547 $1.006 77 $5982 $30 58 $1.270 89 11/28«1 11/28A)1 OuMandns 11/28«1 OuMMdkio 11/28A1 OuManBns 11/28«1 OUMtn*« 11/28A)1 OuMandhig 1108^1 Outatandng 11/28«1 OuMmdhig 11/286)1 Oulatandhig $55.03172 FILTER; ((yMr»7001* and (pay poriodi in (24))) and [pay group] in fOI*) CITY OF ORONO ChMk Mail Rtgittor Fndn.DKwrte«07.2001 PaBtlofS CtMca Amt Ifwolca Cammanl 10100 Frlmafy CMh Paid Chkt 062125 8/14/2000 J0MN80N, JEFF 010M9099 SuapwiM Account (S102 60) 051900 Vod Chock 862129 Total JONNSOliJCFF (S102 60I i>«d6ikl 672459 12/10/2001 APACHE OROUP E 101-41900-223 BWoiGfOundaMaMl Suppfeta ssioee 64091 MuMotdToNOlB Total APACHE OROUP S510 86 PaidChkA 672440 12/10/2001 ARCH MIRELESS E 101-42110-321 Taiepliona $184 49 K3755971L Pagars 12/2001 Total ARCH1MRELE88 $184 49 Paid CMA 072441 12/10/2001 AT A T1MRELESS SERVICES E 602-49450-321 Talopliona $1160 3419397 CallPtionaa E 601-49400-321 Tolapliona $1161 3419397 Cal Phonos E 101-41900-321 Tolapliona $24 52 3419397 Cal Phonos Total AT A T VWRELESS SERVICeS $47 73 Pad OMiP 072442 12/10/2001 RtTUMMOUS ROADWAYS INC. E 101-43000224 Stroal Mamt Malafialt/Supply $1.479 32 83597 WMorMix Total BmjRHNOUS ROADWAYS me.$1 479 32 PadChki 6^i44i 12/10/2001 BiiOOET PRINTING E 101-42110-322 Poalaoa $6 43 12/4A)1 Shipping to Surviva Laik E 101-42110-322 Poatago $619 15252 UPSChargas E 101-42110-201 Offioasupptaa $25 35 15531 Colored Cop«s E 101-42110-322 Poataga $18 15 16272 UPSChargas E 101-42110-322 Poataga $5 95 17521 UPSChargas E 101-42110-201 ORteaiupptai $17526 18360 Raoa«l Books E 101-41900-201 Ollioa aupphat $58 58 18411 Appraoatan Plaque Total BUDOET PRINTING $295 91 PadCnka 072444 12/10/2001 CHAMPION AUTO STORES E 101-43000-222 Vaftida EquipmanI 6 Paris $63 83 D119720 Wlpar Blade. FI Dry Total CHAMPION AUTO STORES $63 83 PadChha 072445 12/1(V206l CLEAR V1^ E 101-42110-404 Rapatts-Mainl Btdga/Grounds $46863 11/30101 Window Osanaig E 101-41900-404 RapanAlaaH-BldgVGrounda $572 75 11/3(y0l Wadow Cleanaig Total CLEAR VCW $1,041 38 Pad CMiS 072446 12/10/2001 cVsUNl#6ksi6 E 101-42110-226 CtoUang A paraonal aqupmanl $43125 3480 Urdorm/Jackat • Good ToUl CVS UNIFORMS $43125 Patrick 072447 12/10/2001 DVINCIS E 101-42110-439 Maataig Eapanaat $99 68 9«01 Poza's - Traawig E 101-41110-439 Maataig Ejcpanaaa $69 93 9««1 Pizza's-Work Sassdn Total fFVmCtS $16961 r. CITY OF ORONO ClMck Detail Ragistor Fntey 0«cana«r 07 2001 Pag*2ore Ch>c>4iiH Invoke* Cotmtwit PaidChtif 072448 12/100061 lUltLOREN SHAROLOm S UBAN E 101-43290-600 Spactal Proiacla. Contwigancy Total OAHLGRENSHAROLOWSINUN 973100 22710 973100 CIS Mapping - Comp Ptan PaalCNdl 072449 12/100001 DAHLKE TREE SERVICE E 101-43000-406 ContracM Straat MaM Total DAHLKE TREE SERVICE 9365 00 11/164)1 9365 00 Put up Hohtay Bannara Paid CAM 072480 12/100001 DELTA DENTAL 0 101-21709 Oantal Inauranca Total DELTA DENTAL 91.224 95 37220072 91.224 95 Oantal • 120001 12/10/2001 DEF E 101 -42110-311 Data Proce«»ino Commumcjbon E 101-41900-321 Tai^>r)one Total OCPTOFAOM -INTCftTECHOIIOUP 937 00 OV01101071 940901 W01100697 9526 61 PVC Circulf - 10/2001 Long Oiat 2/01 to 1001/01 Pmd CUM 0724>ii 12/100001 00^09 E 101-41300-439 Maotng Eipanaoa Total OOeOS 996 07 3957 996 07 Boa LunchM-Worii Souaon Paid Chki 072453 12/100001 E-2RECYCUNO E 101-43270-316 Contract Racyclmg PKAup 95 82012 3070 Total E^ RECYCUNO 95 820 12 Racydmg-110001 PaM CUM 0724^ 12/IO/iOOI E.i.d. cbUPAkv INC. E 101-43000-403 Ropo««Maa4-Miac Eou« 911800 Total E.S O. COMPANY me. 9118 00 RfYER (Concrete pROouefs 7247 Shaipan 04>par eiadat PaMCMdi 07i4^ 12/100001 E 101-43000-224 StiaelMaail Matanaia/Supply Total ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS 91.451 00 177199 91.45100 Lync Ave Stcim Saartr Eat Paid ChiJ 072496 12/100001 FEDEX E 101-41900-322 Poataga E 101-41900-322 Poataga Total FEDEX 922 64 91362 936 46 4 000-61153 4-001-47257 DaKvaiy to Fbnt DaHvary to Flmt P5dCSS 072497 12/100001 FORTlSMNEFlTS 0 101-21712 OtharOaductiona 9667 51 4019625-1 Total FORTI8 BENEFITS 9687 51 LTD-Oac 2001 Paid CAM 072456 12/160661 6SKSERVICEi E 101-41900-404 RapairaAtomt-Bldga/Orounda E 101-42110-404 Rapaira4Mamt Bldga/Grounda E IOt-41900-404 RapauadMamt-Bldoa/Orounda Total OSK SERVICES 951 71 847774 910942 647775 951 71 847776 9212 84 Mat SarvKa - CH Mat Sannea • PO Mat Saivica • CC ^aid dAiani72430 12/100001 OAFFRON.MIKE E 101-42400-331 Traval Eapanaat 946 53 1204)1 M4aaga/PartungOunt>ar Total OAFFRON.MN(E 946 53 CITY OF ORONO Clwck MaH Raglater ___ Clwcli Amt Friday. Otc«mb«f 07.2001 PagaSelO (nvoica Commanl i>a4Cliki 072400 12/10/2001 OALL'S IMC. E 10I-42110-221 Eqwpmant Pam A/tccaaaonaa Total GALL'S me. SS6 96 55310001 ssooe Pori Caaaala Raooidar Pa«i CAM 0724^1 12/lA^1 HAMSEN. STEVEN C. ' "" E 101-42110-226 OotfiingOparMnalaquomarl $100 00 11/2»01 Total HANSEN. STEVEN C. $10000 Slaal Toad Boon P m ChW 072462 12/10/2001 HANMON AUTOGLASS E 101-42110-402 RaaanAla*4-AuloE qmp $21320 71000011050 Total HANMON AUTOGLASS $213 20 RaotacaWndoMh-Sod 191 Pwd CnHr072463 12/10«»1 HAWKINS CHEIMCAL E 001-49400-210 CAamcala and Cham Products $1 727 41 394200 $1,72741 Flourvia/CMonna Total HAWKINS CHEMKZAL Pawl Child 072404 12/1012001 HENOMCKS, NON E 101-42110-437 Trainvig 0 Davalopmenl $7 80 11/19^1 Total HENDRICKS. NON $7 88 Meal • Dnvino School PaKtChlid 072465 12/10/2001 HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE E 101-43000-212 Motor Fuals & Lubricants $56 23 00903 Total HENNEPIN CO-OP SEED EXCHANGE $56 23 Propana Paid Cltlun)724a6 12/10/2001 PENNEPIN COUNTY • HEALTH E 101-41300-437 Training & Oavatopmenl $25 00 11/28/01 Total HENNEPIN COUNTY • HEALTH $25 00 Haailhy Haa/1 Saminar PaidChU 072407 12/10/2001 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUNER-GEN $952 50 293 $952 50 E 101-41000-309 JadChargas Total HENNEPIN COUNTY TNEASUNEN-GEN Room and Board lOOOOl Paid Chki 072408 12/10/2001 HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIGHT CO E 101-42110-317 AnanalCara $127 50 3rdOtr BoardmgFaas Total HUMANE SOCIETY OF WRIGHT CO $127 50 E 101-43000-222 Vatuda Equa)mani 8 Pam $53 25 10000255 Bananas E 001-49400-222 Vah«la Equpmant A Pam $53 25 10000255 Bananas E 002-49450-222 Vahda Eqiapnwnt A Pam $53 25 10000255 Bananas Total INTENSTATE BATTERIES $159 75 Pad Chkd 072470 1^10/2001 JOHNiON.JEFF 0101-19999 Suspansa Account $102 60 S/19«0 Rapiaoa Chach 02125 8/14/OC Total JOHNSON. JEFF $102 80 MaidChU 072471 12/10/2001 JOHNSON. MARY ANN E 101-41300-331 Travel Eipansas $6 90 12«01 IMMQt Total JOHNSON. MARY ANN $6 90 PaidChkd 072472 12/10/2001 JOHNSON. mCK E 101-42110-489 OlharMiaGalanaousCharoas $82 50 11/01 Daar Ramot/al • Nov 2001 CITY OFORONO Ch«ek Datail R«gist»r Friday. Oseanter 07.2OOI Pagadors Ctwck Ami Involca Cpmmanl Total JOHNSON. mCK $82 50 ?o3ThBnJTnfS 12/10^1 klip^ E 101-42110-226 CioOMng & parMnal aquapmofO $7185 4920 Total KEEPERS $7185 Tumanadi >aKl dhkt^ 12/10/2001 KENNETH N. POTTS, PA E 101-41600-306 Logat-Prosacul«n $2.391 66 11/2001 Total KENNETH N. POTTS. PA $2,391 66 Proaocubon-11/2001 Paid Chki 072475 12/10/2001 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS, INC E 101-42110-228 Tramng Suppbas $35 68 29653 Total LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS. INC $35 68 ^a«d dhliA 0y2476 li/10/2001 LOGtS Trammg Ainmo. Targots E 101-42110-329 E 101-42110-310 E 101-41900-329 E 101-41900-311 E 101-42110-489 E 101-41900-401 E 101-42110401 E 10142110401 Ottwr ConuTtunications LOOIS-Apptaanon* OllMf CommunicalJons Data Procatamg Communication Oilwf Mtscalanaoua Criaigaa Ragara/Mainl-Oflica Equal Rapan/Mainl-OfAoa Equip Rapava/Mainl-OfAca Equal Total LOGIS $116 00 21180 Inlamal 10/2001 $952 00 21180 PoUca Racofda 10/2001 $116 00 21180 Intamel 100001 $30 00 21205 Hann County Connection $4840 21234 Poica Oomam Name $11666 21260 SeiverMami $58 34 21260 Server Main! $100 00 21260 Pokca Web Site $1.537 40 PaidCMia 072477 12/10/2001 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT E 10143000-221 Equa>ment Parts & Accauonea $15 37 25552 Total LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT $15 37 Shop Supplies PaMChiUI 072478 12/10/2001 MAOSON. ADRIENNE E 10142110-201 omcasupphaa $7 51 11/20ri)1 Total MADSON. ADRIENNE $7 51 Stationary PaidCMJI oyi4>9 12/10/2001 MAGIC CLEANERS E 10142110-221 Equaimoni Parts A Accassonaa Total MAGIC CLEANERS $7223 12/1/01 $72 23 Blanket Cleaning PaidChUI 6724A0 12/10/2001 M6C PRESENTATIONS E 10142110489 OtharMvcalaneouaCharges Total MBC PRESENTATIONS $30000 9Q6«1 $300 00 Aldiohoi Sales Seminar PadChk# 072^^1 12/10/2001 MCLEOD USA PUBLISHING E 10141900401 RepsirsAlUintOflica Equ« $135 34 221527 O10I-1M00 Prapatitlems $1.488 66 221527 Total MCLEOD USA PUBUSHMIG $1 624 00 Maud Agraemeni-Phona System Maait Agraement-Pfiona System Paid Cliii^72482 12/10/2001 MEDICA E 10142110-131 Emptoyar Past Haatt) Total MEDICA $502 06 102552/30002 Inswranca 11/2001 $502 08 Paid Ctikm72485 12/100001 IMOWEST ASPHALT E 10143000024 SbaatUaint Matanals/Suppiy $130 51 69797M8 Hand Patch CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register Friday. OKarnlMf 07.2001 PaO*9or6 CfMCk Ann Tout WOWEST ASPHALT $130 51 Paid CMif 0724S4 12/10/2001 MNmEAPOUS COM A TECH COLLEGE E 101-42110437 Training ft Oavatopmani $65 00 02-033 DaU Prhracy-Dobtian $20000 02-033 Dau Practrcaa - Sdtoanliofl E 101-42110-437 Trammg ft Davc*opman|$575 00 02-033 Firearms Instnictar-McNaay Tout MmNEAROUS COM ft TECH r COE $84000 PaalCMdi 072485 12/10/2001 MMNEAROUF OTGEN COMPANY E 101-421*0^321 Equamianl Parts ft Aooaa .anas $14 40 R111010922 Madrcal Oxygen Tout MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY $1440 Paid CNtf 072406 12/10/2001 iIti £6. Q613-10420 Fuad Aasal-Olhar aquipmani $5,852 18 107780 Sprayer • GC Tout MTIDI8TCO.$5 852 18 PaMCllkf 072487 12/10/2001 NCPCRS GItOUP LIFE MS 0101-21710 Ufa Insuranoa $156 00 67321201 PERA UN 12/2001 Total NCPEHSOeOUPUFCMS $156 00 Paid CMS 072408 12/10/2001 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS E 101-42110-321 Taleplwna $976 94 2819346-4 Pohea Cal Plionas Tout NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS $976 94 ^aii^diNI 07248$ 12/10/2001 OFFICE DEPOT E 101-42110-201 Offica supphas $98 68 144138621 OfficaSupphas E 101-41900201 OMoasupphas $12061 144138621 omcaSupphas E 101-42110-201 OffIcasuppUa $266 70 144802124 Office S«jppUs E 101-41900-201 OfRcasuppUs $325 96 144802124 Office Suppkas Tout OFFICE DEPOT $81195 Pad CM# 072490 12/10/2001 6LSbN.i0ll E 101-41500-331 Travai Expanaas $53 13 12/3AI1 MOeaga-Bank Daposta E 101-41500 331 Travai Expanaas $72 11 12/3/01 Miiasga-Bsnii Oaposrts E 101-42110-221 Equipriwm Parts ft Accaaaonaa $13 83 12/36)1 CaWa - Smad Trailar Total OLSON, NON $139 07 Paid CM# 072491 12/KV2001 OMAN. LYLE E 101-42400-331 Travai Expanaas $30 00 10/186)1 M4aaga RamntMirsamant E 101-42400-331 Travel Expanaas $26 22 10«6)1 M4aaga RamPuraamani $36 57 11/286)1 M4aaga Ravnburaamani E 101-42400-331 Travai Expanaas $17 25 11/306)1 M4aaga Raanpursamanl E 101-42400-331 Travel Expanaas $34 15 11/306)1 M4aage Ravnbursamani Total OMAN. LYLE $144 19 PaidCrtUi 072492 12/10/2001 PEEN ENVIRONMENTAL ft ENGINECNl E 101-43290-510 Land $1.600 00 9306 Haz llal Swrvay-3770 SDortline E 101-43290800 Spaoal Profacta. ConOngancy $160000 9318 Haz Ual Survay-340 WNow Total PEER ENVmONMENTAL ft CNGMEERI $3.200 00 Raid CINN 072493 12/KV2001 PETTIT E 101-41500 331 Travai Expanaas $10 35 12/eei MMaaga Rafenburiamafll CITYOFORONO Clwck Mail Ragiatar Chack Amt Invoie* Friday . DMwrbar 07.3001 PaotOort PaMCIM 072494 Total prmr. sanora k . sio ss 12/I0>200t PIOWCCR E 101-41900-SS2 Pnttng A Pubhstung E 10M1000-M2 Pmtng A PubtalMog E 101-42400-340 GanaraiAdvartwng E 101 •41900-352 Pmbng A Pubtalwig E 101 <41900-352 Pnnbng A PuMalung Total PIONEER $40 73 826 NoOeaofHaartag-SlormVUMar $2319 840 Notioaofhaarmg-HomaOoc $2899 845 A|ki I2736 $5991 850 PutKOrdmaiKa 8210 $32 85 651 Pub^Vdmanoa 8209 $191 67 Paid Oik8 072495 12/10/3001 POWERCLCAN COMPANY INC. E 101-42110404 RapanMaml-Bldgt/Grounds $1.441 93 0485 CarpatHlla Claarung E 101-41900-404 RapanMaml-Bldgi/Grounda $1,762 35 8465 CarpatrTila Ctaanmg E 101-42110-404 RapawiA4aMil-BW94A3roundt $762 01 8519 Jaiuhinal-11/01 E 101-41900-404 RapanMaint-BldotASrounda $931 34 8519 Jantonal • 11/01 Total POWERCLEAN COMPANY INC. $4 897 63 J*akicl4c8 072496 12/10/2001 QWEST E 001-49400-321 TelapAone $53 13 6124717766 Phorw Saivica E 602-49450-321 Talapliona $40 87 6124719037 Alarm Oialar E 613-49830-321 Taleptwne $56 73 6124739904 Phone Servioa E 613-49830-340 General Advertising $229 80 6124739904 0«r Advertisng Total QWEST $362 53 Paid ChkI 072497 12/100001 r A th ^UN, BARRY E 101-43000-226 Clothing A personal equipment $79 99 12^/01 Stael Toe Boots Total RATHBUN. BARRY $79 99 >aKJChk8 0>249^ 12/10/2001* RELIANT ENERGY E 601-49400-381 Gas A Electric E 101-41900-381 Gas A Electric E 101-42110-381 Gas A Electric E 602-49450-381 GasAEIectnc E 101-41900-381 GasAEIectnc Total RELIANT ENERGY $220 64 0600C67S0600 Gas Service $325 82 060006750600 GasServica $101 77 060006750600 Gas Servica $11 10 060006750600 Gas Service $124 36 060008750600 GasSennea $783 71 '^•idClikP 072499 12/100001 ROM INC. E 6O2-4945(MO0 Rapairs/Maml-Swr knesAfte Total ROM INC. $260 00 11/1401 $260 00 Sewer Mamt-2505 Ounwoody l»aMCfifc8 C72SOO t2/tOOOOrSCHOENHOFF. JOHN E 101-42110-437 TramngADevetopmenl $44 34 11/1901 Total 8CHOENHOFF. JOHN $44 34 Maals-Intamet Training PaidCMii 072501 12/10/2001 SCHWA1BINO E 101-41900-201 OHIcasuppkas $34 34 K17S99 Total 8CHWAB8MC. $34 34 Notary Stamp PaidClifc8 072503 12/100001A ny Mr drug stores 1 CITY OF ORONO Check Detail Register Fmtoy Otcmirbt 07.3001 Page 7 of ft CtMcfi Amt Invoteo C ormim«N E 101-43110-201 Oflico tuppkM E 101-42110-220 Ctotfang ft pononol oqiMpmom EqutpmonI Pa<1s ft Accosionet Offico supphos Total SNYDER OftUO STORES E 101-42110-221 E 101-42110-201 S665 11/1M)1 S477 11/2/01 $36 71 11/21/01 SS6 36 11/0A)1 $204 15 F4m Davalopmq BlachPoiMli F4m Pufff. Film Fa3a5& 072504 ilTlO^I STREICHERS E 101-42110-226 E 101-42110-226 E 101-42110-221 «• 101-42110-226 E <01-42110-221 E ni-42110-221 E 10. 42<*Cr>1 E 101-42110-226 E 101-42110-226 E 101-42110-226 E 101-42110-226 E 101-42110-221 E 101-42110-221 E 101-42110-226 E 101-42110-226 E 101-42110 221 ClottMng ft personal equipmeiM Clolhtfig ft person SI eqvupnwnt Equpment Paris ft AccMSones CkMhmg ft personal equipment Equpmant Parts ft Acoassor«s Equipment Parts ft Accassonas EquqMnem Parts ft AoeassoPas Cothing ft personal equpment Clothing ft persona' equpmerrt Ctothing ft personal equpmeni Clothing ft personal equpment Equipment Parts ft Accessories Equipment Parts ft Accessones ClotNng ft personal equipment Clothing ft personal equipment Equipment Parts ft Accessories Total STREICHERS S109S7 246041 1 $537 63 2466461 $16615 249166 1 $57 40 2506181 ($2C 57) 251486 1 ($560 24) 2518691 $6917 2519:: 1 $503 08 252336 1 $88 75 252336 2 ($26 57) 252488 1 $15 42 252666 1 $35 04 254117 1 $1360 254411 1 $59 90 2555091 $138 99 257233 1 $8917 2579191 $1.247 69 Badge - HendneSs Bereoa Model 960 Flascher Handcuffs Crad4-Baltefy Cradrt-Strotw Olympus Camara Umform-Ameson Turtleneck - Ameson Credit - Cuff Holder Tie Bar Stmger Bub. Battery Switch K4 Oloves. Raincoat Shirt. Trousers-FisOier Olympus Camera Paid (^hkf ()72i06 12/10/2001 SURVIVALINK E 101-42110-221 Equipment Parts ft Accessories Tout SURVIVAUNK $167 56 46308 $167 56 Dehbniator Battery PaidChk# 072507 12/10/2001 TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI E 101-41600-306 Legal-Prosecution Total TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI $133 58 11/2001 $133 58 Prosecution 11/2001 PaidChha 072506 12/10/2001 TOLL OAS ft WELDINO SUPPLY E 101-43000-221 Equpment Parts ft Accessories $78 18 143639 Welding Supplies Total TOLL GAS ft WELDING SUPPLY $7818 PaidChMI 072509 12/10/2001 TRACY TRIPP FUELS E 101-43000-212 Motor Fuels ft Lubricanu G 101-14101 Gasokne Inventory E 613-49630-212 Motor Fuels ft LutmeanU Total TRACY TRIPP FUELS $1 209 25 85986 $2 206 75 85986 $1.101 99 86084 $4 517 99 992 Gal Dasel 1402 Gal Unleaced Unleaded. Dasel • GC PaalChlUi 072510 \Z 10/2001 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED E 101-42110-228 Clothing ft personal equipment Total UNIFORMS UNUMITED $193 33 100345 $193 33 Sturts. Accassonas-Ameson IpTdCtSiOTjsTl 12/10.'2001 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE E 101-41900-321 Teieptwna $25000 Annual Fees E 101-41900 322 Postage $50 00 Bo* 66 Total UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE $300 00 Annual Maang Foe Annual Fee - Boi 66 CITYOFORONO Chtck Detail Ragittar Frktoy. D«c«nb«r 07.2001 PagtOors Chacit Amt liwwto Comwwnt Paid ciiJ 072912 vEmTON binMif6MiGr E 601-49400-321 Tatophoiw $14.10 10034989141 E 602-49490-321 Talaphona $1410 10034905141 Pottoa Cal Plwnoa E 101-41900-321Talaphooa $39708 10035922058 CalPtionaa Total VCmZONOMECTOII^$42540 PaidChMI 072913 12/1W2001 1MUOHT HENNEPM ELECTIUC E 602-49450-381 Oaa&Eiaclilc $2310 3113009200 Elactdcal Sanrica E 101-43000-381 OaaOElacific $7 09 3413388000 Elactneal Saivioa E 101-43000-381 OaaOElactrie $7 99 9014799900 Elactrical Saivico E 101-43000-381 Oat&Elactrtc $8 99 9014887100 Eiactfical Saivioa Total i1$4807 Paid Clifcf 072514 12/1012001 XCEL ENENOV E 101-49200-381 GaaftENcIrtc $15 37 ANocatton Elactiical Saivloa E 801-49400-381 Gas & Elactnc $3.489 30 AlocaHon Elactiical Saivioa E 002-49490-381 GaaiElaetnc $1.383 24 Alocatton Elactiical Sanriea E 101-41900-381 GaaAEIacIrtc $1,230 00 Alocabon Eladncai Saivioa E 101-42110-381 Oaa& Elactnc $455 78 Alocatton Elactiical Saivioa E 013-49830-381 Oaa&Elactnc $210 33 Alocatton ElacMcal Saivioa E 101-43000-381 Oaa&Elactfic $32 98 Alocatton ElacMcal Saivioa E 101-42110-381 Oaa&Elactiie $9 42 Attocatton Eiadrtcai Saivioa E 101-43000-381 Oaa&Eiactiic $129 25 Hwy12 Hwy 12/WMow Signal Total XCEL ENERGY $8.942 47 E 101-42400-437 $4000 12/12A)1 Land Um Sammai E 101-42400-437 $40 00 Wainbargar Saminar Total aCNSIBLE LAND US€ COALITION $80 00 10100 PrImaiyCaah $59 124 34 CITY OF ORONO CtMck Dstall ftogltttr Friday, OMwnlMr 07.2001 PagtIoM Cl«aeii Ami Imalea Cammanl 10100 PrhnaryCaah Pau cW b71859 11/140001 HENNEPIN COUNY?"" E 101*41900>201 Oflioaaupphaa Total HENNWN COUNTY PaU 6iUrS7ia60 11/14/2001 kMkiEPiNcouNfTIR E 101-41«0(KS09 JaiCharooa ToM HENNEPM COUNTY TNEAOUNEimiEN S2S.00 WManthaanaf Raoord Signabifa-WMamhamaf S25 00 MMEII-OEN S827 00 248 $827 00 Room & Board • 9T2001 Paid Chldl AVi861 11/140001 OU) REPUBLIC E 233-45670489 Olhar MNoalanaoua Chatgat $4.800 00 Grant Total OLOREPUMJC $4.80000 Orant-Hongaalag 3714 LMngtlo E 23345670489 OtharWaooAanaouaCharget $20.20000 DafLoan ToM OLD REPUBUC > DEf LOAN $20.20000 Oaf LrvHarrgaitag 3714 Uvingat PaaChni 071863 E 10141900-321 TaNphona Total VERIZON WIRELE8S 11/14/2001 VERIZON WIRELESS $39644 10035922058 Ca« Ptwnat $396 44 f>aaifiy»ig^^—ii/ii/M^ UMMNIPMeoUNWTf^sOliift'^M---------------------------- E10141600-309 JaiChargas ($827 00) 248 Void Check 672297 E 10141900-201 Offioa suppliat ($25 00) Wtntamheanaf Void Chock 672297 Total HENNEPtN COUNTY TREA8URER.GEN ($852 00) ^aid Cliki 672UI 11/13/20b^ Vskizoi^ bikMctofUES E 10141900-321 Talaphona ($396 44) 10035922058 Void Check 72358 Total VERIZON DIRECTORIES ($396 -4) 10100 PrImaiyCaah $25.000 00 CITY OF ORONO ClMck Mail Ffttfay, OMOTter 07. 3001 Pa0*1«f1 CtwckAMi ItIM FilHMnrCHh 0013-10300 ChwoaFund 020000 Rmom ChangaFund ToM CnYOFOOOMOFCTTVCAaHOOLF S20000 PlidCM* 001957 11/20/2001 IM TURF CONFEREMCC E01V49030-437 Trinng 0 OMtopnwnt 0140 00 SNdwYiaow Turf Coniwanca-millsnhagsn ToW IMTURFCONF1M0ICC 014000 E 703-40000-370 Innjrinoa CMucHbiM 06S64S 11034486 Radwtt - SnoMDoMa ToM LMCIT-aevajEYAIMm 0650 45 PaUCMiO 071107 li/30/2001 OcA • IMRE 6lk.V 0101-31719 OCA/SiMnding Accounts 0410 15 11/20«1 Spandmg Acda -11/29/01 Tolil OCA-MIREONLY 041015 PMCNiO 072914 11/13/2001 NR CMEF OF FOUCE ASSN (075 00) Momwcxynski VoW ClMCk 72312 To(M MN CHIEF OF POLICE ASSN (07500) 10100 Primary CmIi 01.33160 --------- - — Ofc t 0 2001 Co I wr intormation items COUNCIL MEETING OF •aecT^NO DEC 1 0 2001 CUYUhOHOW2_ I . ..