Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-13-1978 Planning Packet
agenda / PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1978 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER 1. Call to Order/Roll 2. Comprehensive Planning Comments PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING - 7:30 P.M. 3. #432 Burt Corwin, 1125 Himter Drive APPEARANCE SUBDIVISION 4. James Bloemendahl, DNR - Review of Site Plan for Wakefield-Conry Rest Area, Willow Drive ACTION ITEMS 5. #306 Colpepper Land Company, 40 Orono Orchard Road - SUBDIVISION COMBINED ACTION/WORK SESSION 6. 7. #435 Richard Perry, 440 Willow Drive South VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #436 Alexander Holzer, 2677 Casco Point Road VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SKETCH PLAN REVIEW 8. #428 Ken Chapman, 2695 Shadywood Road - SUBDIVISIOI 9. #433 Judd Ringer, 2240 Wayzata Boulevard - SUBDIVISION 10. #434 Fred Herfurth, 225 North Femdale SUBDIVISION/REZONING/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 11. #437 Larry Osgood, 365 Willow Drive North - SUBDIVISION INFORMATION ITEMS 12. Joint Meeting Planning Commission/Council Novend>er 30, 1978 at 7:30 P.M. 13. Omit second meeting in December APPROVAL OF MINUTES 14. Meeting of October 23,1978 r Pi ,m;e of oiONO I TO: FROM: Planning Coonlsalon and Cotmcll Jeanne Mabuath, Assistant Zoning Administrator #4 32 I DATE:October 17, 1978 SUBJECT: #432 - Burt Corwin, 1125 Hunter Drive Subdivision Application SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Zoning District RR-IB Mr. Corwin proposes a 2 lot subdivision of a 22+ acre parcel In the northwest quadrant at the Intersection of County RMd 6 and Hunter Drive. The 2.6 acre lot has an existing house with an on-slte septic system that will be Inspected by the Septic Inspector. We will waive a septic test for the 19+ acre lot. The developer should be made aware that If this 19+ acre parcel Is subdivided a septic test win be required. There are three designated wetlands Involved in this subdivision each must be designated either by a metes and bounds or drainage easement description. The applicant must then enter into a Conservation and Flowage Easement agreement with the City. The final plan must designate a S' drainage and utility easement along lot lines. The 2.6 acre lot meets the necessary 2*acre continuous dry bulldable requirement. All setbacks for the house and accessory buildings meet the zoning requirements of the district. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - OCTOBER 23, 1978 Planning Comnlsslon gave conceptual approval for Burt Corwin's two lot subdivision. The Comnlsslon requested a public Information meeting be scheduled for November 13, 1978. STAFF UPDATE - OCTOBER 31, 1978 Please note setback for shed along north lot line Is not recorded - It appears to be less than 10 ft. Another shed to the west and slightly north of existing shed Is unsafe and should be removed before final approval. / i ' ,r I * r APFEAFANCE - JIM BLOEMEHOAHL (DNR)•> Mr. Bloemendalil will be I*”*”* Vlllow Drive „„ thf Enclosed elte plen for be. notsst.%rd !:r;er s; r ir-uSiB mp»t i- st,« .nd the Planning Comaiaalo*'* r 1 I ,v"r % 'T ■t*h • *-“4 ’!b- \ \fy' • V t 'i wM; 1W»* i ^^ **?•*»* m fn 1 TO:Planning Commission and Council o FROM:Alan P. Olson, Village Planner DATE:November 7, 1978 SUBJECT: #306 Subdivision - Orono Oaks Richard Neslund & Ralph Carlson Companies This application was made on August 23, 1977, as a 17 lot, 2 acre proposal. A public hearing was held on October 3, 1977. The Boonestroo firm was retained to review the proposal, which review was heard at the Planning Commission meeting of November 21, 1977. Because of various concerns and conflicts, the plan was then tabled for redesign. A revised plan for 12 lots was submitted to the Planning Commission on June 26, 1978, A public information meeting was held July 24, 1978 after which the Planning Commission recommended preliminary approval. On July 25, 1978, the Council granted preliminary approval of the proposal to include platting of the "exception" lot In the southeast corner. On October 26, 1978, because of Impending frost, the applicant asked for and received from the Council special permission to begin two foundations In the division, subject to code compliance and septic review, pending Imminent submittal of the final plat. To date, one permit has been Issued (Lot 6); the other Is awaiting septic testing and construction plans. As of November 3, 1978, the applicant has submitted final plats and legal documents sufficient to satisfy the terms of preliminary approval. The applicant, Richard Neslund, Is Intending to convey title to Ralph Carlson Companies upon plat approval. The City Attorney will review all legal documents for proper endorsement prior to final signature by the City. The final plat consists of 13 residential lots averaging 2.5 acres of dry bulldable land per lot. Lots 2, 3, 8 & 9 appear to be less than 2.0 dry acres (85X to 98%) but most average over 100,000 sq. ft. in area up to 150,000 sq. ft. The divisions follow natural topographical boundaries. There Is a private road serving most lots and a private driveway easement serving lots 9, 10 & 13. All wetlands and dralnageways are designated and a conservation easement Is being granted to the City. November 7, 1978 Orono Oaks Page 2 7T cl :T) ." k The private road enters O'rtrd'flahrdtstaVcer^^nuMiewrr due ?o the sharp rise and this problem as a has agreed to participate In the correction condition to allowing h s roa ^ hill on Orono Orchard benefiting his property to *e Mxl^. ™%J‘\„terceptor. The rdl^nio^win u:e thu «orh IS completed. «• _ a f*f*d oilPu. ;1 subdlvisxon wixi —r-- I recommend approval of this final plat according to the attached resolution. ri %MKK ■ ■■ ■, ; V- r i V. t.'i'TV i- .» ^ •.I'*' g.\ - f . tel .f m ■ f ,»rwl " 1 1 *TK.a * .* '} ’ , 1 .-'T A , r:-vi Wi /V r .. ‘ V V"i-r StJUft'. • ; • ■■ ‘ IgeiiL- ■' ».o .. i . .1- I . t. • ' * .t • ' »• \ to ■> ' ^ '■ ** * V * b.e* 11 .,• r • • ** ' *V4-* • I j Air „ . Mf•-»., ' ! •Jf- - cilifk J'. r- 4^. t RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF ORONO OAKS WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision plat by Richard Neslund (Colpepper Land Company) and Ralph Carlson Companies, Inc., the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Platting of the property into Single Family Residential lots meeting the zoning code performance standards for the RR-lB zoning use district, including a density ratio of at least 2.0 acres of dry-bulldable land per dwelling unit and site investigation to determine on-site sewage treatment system capabilities on each such lot. 2. Dedication on the plat of rights of way for public streets and roads, shown as Orono Orchard Road North. 3. Creation of a new private road shown on the plpt as Outlet A, to be known henceforth as Orono Oaks Drive. m Concurrent with the creation of this private road, the subdivider has dedicated to the City, a Road and Utilities Easement (Exhibit A) granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said Outlet. The City does not intend to acquire or open said road as a public roadway but does intend to assure permanent access for emergency vehicles, public service vehicles and other invited guests of the individual owners' of said road. 4. Creation of a new Private Driveway Easement (Exhibit B) for Ingress, egress and utility purposes over Lots 10 & 13 in favor of Lots 9 & 10. v' i; V i i •» ■. t li ''M ■-Tfrto>oA', «T1 -r - ' ■' Resolution No. Page 2 5. Creation of a Homeowner's Association to be known as "Orono Oaks Association, Inc.", for purposes to include the "owning, managing, maintaining, repairing, replacing and operating" of the Private Road and other commonly owned properties, which maintenance shall ensure a continuing standard of quality equal to the quality approved by the City as a part of this Subdivision or as otherwise may be required from time to time by Ordinance of the City. 6. Dedication on the plat of "drainage easements" and "drainage and utility easements". 7. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement (Exhibit C) providing for limitations on the use of wetlands and/or drainageways described therein and shown on the plat as "wetland" and/or "drainage easements 8. Execution of an Improvement Agreement providing for the Installation and/or payment for the installation of certain Roadway Improvements to Orono Orchard Road involving the change of grade of said Road to improve the safety of the Intersection of said Road with the new Private Road. 9. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $3,250.00. 10. Payment of all Variable Additional Costs Incurred by the City in processing and review of this subdivision application according to Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Orono Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1. Pending completion of the agreed upon Improvements to Orono Orchard Road, the subdivider shall close to all traffic the permanent Intersection on Outlet A and shall provide a temporary intersection and roadway across lot 12 to connect Orono Orchard Road and the new Private Road. Upon completion of the Improvements satisfactory to the City, the existing temporary Intersection across lot 12 shall be closed and removed by the subdivider and/or the owner of lot 12, and the permanent intersection on Outlot A shall be opened to use. -J Resolution No. Page 3 -1 •# > .'. y r’. ; rH t . 2. NO acces. or curb cut *a“^be^P^™ttted^o^o^ ^ri“9. uVu)"and the new Private Driveway (for lots 9, 10 & 13). r;quSraddUionaf tesUng and/orinstallation of haa not provided “”f/‘4tfjepa "nd because the area, tested forpercolatlon on certain lots have be« disturbed during site grading operations. _ ^ ^_1 a-V%A4 The aforesaid plat shall be filed .f as noted above.as notea The approval granted aSo«!^\r?irt “e^^t ft‘wiu‘ Srn«“sfii1o"^ae% n^ arpUcatlon with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this day o£ William Be Van Nest, Mayor ATTEST; Walter R. Benson, clerK/administrator i rtalTd MjL TO; 'Jr: Planning Comnlaaion and Council jMime M«bu.th, Asst. Zoning Administrator #435 DATE: November 1, 1973 SUBJECT:#435 - Rlctord Perry, Jr., 440 Willow Drive Variance & Conditional Use Permit i 'i; - SWe V«rd Setback (Zoning District 8R-1B) • S; culf:"** (82.5') and extreme gredrof slwe £r^lot line. - • lot to the western tonditional Use Permlir - Work Session drlvemey. la«n end pU^Sn^f te?dfw» *»*• and hazardous drlvewa- co^lMonf ^ *5* «*treme slope the eppllcant fiir^^nS'eS^gtoHJl^^ end proposed grades a£ter £1U “<>t^,«xl«tlng grade drainage fre, to be^ev^liidtj ‘o «« .<)&-■ »r *u- 'Kjf r*‘ 4. V i . Ls^'X- ^ • 4^ *» > #435 Lstrator ow Drive emit RR-IB) j£?. gte five feet (5') from re narrov lot width e lot to the western diagram with an Lng a level area for I are extreme slope nths. Staff recommends •ting existing grade I wetlands to the west hgineer. ““Tl« or PROroSAL (or property) ***”•• t.lilUw c- Description _ - - - - - - - --T —k^rit type of request S^ivision S150+$5/lot **>*••• ®WNER l^eme^rKM^ (L -r- Moiling r’ir, _«<ULf2L/| fee itional l»«e $50 Variance $50 Reaonlng $250 Riprap $15 ($65) Present Zoning Date * By Present-— use Zoning Ordinance Section Rela«-<in» *• «Relating to Request vg Specify Ordinance Requirements ____ lot Aro. / Wath l-^Rear. Other, e3q>lain —^ ------ ucner, e3q>lain . — ■ •-rdrt.lp. to property .. ~ VHOVnavm appllcetlon ____Reeidentlel Dther, e9q>lain Do, of lots .Mt CLr\^ /xfi 77ZT ,a-.. ^ n»<m -a U ft/ Ayr>^ ^oposal ^ A-603 Government Center Oonetructlon pl«„. u eppUcable (Z xe pre-addressed to eacdi ol — 9l ^ «Dove list. o?3 - 9^ ^ m I i;i f I I ) ' I I 1 • - Plat of Survey for Pdchard W. Perry, Jr, in the Southueet 1/4 of Section 3>117»23 #435 9r 55- liei.n S3 T2 ‘ Certlfirfctf of SxaTfe;.': I hereby certify Inti this It a true anc correct reprepent^jtlon of a sur\'ey of the boundaries of; Thtt 02rt of the f.'orth 1/2 of the North 1/.' of the r.orthvest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Secllor 3, Town- shin 117 N'crth, hanfe 2? test of th“ t>th Princlosl lierldian, seprrll ed as fcllowe: Fcglnnin^ at the Sot v.cRt cor er of said North 1/2 of the North. 1/2 of the Northwest l// the Southwest 1/4; thence i.orth along the nest line thereof e distunce of 19£ feet; thenre East of:rbllol with the South line of Bale North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Northwert l/i of the Southueat 1/4 to the centerline of the fomnr County Ko-.e; thence Southwesterly alcru. said centrrijne to Its Intersection vltJi the South line cf said J^rth. 1/2 of th» North 1/2 of tr» Northwest I/4 of the Southwest 1 <I no to the oolrt of N ginnln^, and o'* the Nort.hvest I/4 of the Southwest 1// of Section 3, r.est oV the 5th Pr^nclptl h.ericlar., der.crlljed 3P frllowB: 1/4; th»'re9 W»st along Bald South P/ That part o'* the North 1// Township 117 ’‘orth, pjnge 23 CoBDmdng ?♦ t'»' point of Intorsectlnr of the South line s'* said North 1/.-. of the North west 1/4 of th-' Southwest I/4 with the ccr.terllr.e o^ th® forrer Cnur.ty ;vo,-d; thence East alonr eatd South line 247.5 feet; thence North a distance of IIC,' feet to the pclnt of beginning of the land to be ceacrlbod; thence continuing North "2,5 feet; theneo West vi+h ‘•sin South lino to said centerline; thence South**rly along said centerline to a line dr'-vn West throu|*''. th« point of beginning parallel with sale South line; tbenes Rest *-o o-lr ’ of >>«ginrdng, And the lo''ation of all oxlstlng luildings tr.*»recn. It dc'-r net rrurpert tc show other itaoixvosterts or oncroachEents, Scale: fisto i o t 1" = 5C* 9-21-78 iron Barker 6064Ciordon a. Coffin Alvin I; Behcer Reg. Nr.13295 Surveyors arii Civil Snginoers licng I«ke, Klnnesota n I ) Plat of Survey for Richard W, Perry, Jr, in the Soulhueat 1/4 of Section 3-117-23 #435 f T?' >—U.4* \ • e; 1 1 (1 i 1 «s I •• — VO* cl i/Jtrr w| Certificate of Surve;.': .■ I hereby cortiiy tnti this is a true and correct reorepentatlon of a sur\'ey of the boundaries of: ^ Thi-t oart of the torth i/? of the North 1/Z of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Sectior Town ship 117 %'crth. Fian^H ?3 '••est of th>» hth Prir.cjnal I.eridian, depcrll ed or. fcllowr: ^ht Southwest con.er of said forth l/P of the forth l/p of the forthwest l/z cf the Southwest 1/4; ther.ee North alon^j the ^cct line thereof a distance of 196 feet; then<*e East a'.rallol with the South lire of said forth 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 to the centerline of the fomer County ho c; thence Southwesterly blori<; said centreline to its intersection with the South line cf said T^rthi 1/2 of the forth 1/2 of tr« Northwest I/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thonce W»st alony said South lino to the point of t* £innln^, and £/ That part o'* the forth 1/4 0.'* the fort.hvest 1/a of th<; Southwest 1/4 of Section 3, ?: Township 117 ?’erth, Pjn;:e 23 '•est of the 5th Principtl Kerldlar., described frllowB; CoBUDencing st t-o point of Intorsectior of the South line c " said North 1//. of the ferth- west 1/4 of t.-’ Southwest i/4 with the centerllr.e the forcer County hot-d; thence East alonr ecid South line 247.5 feet; thence North a distance of 115,' b^ct to the point of beginnin" o'* the land to be described; thence continuing forth r2.5 foot; thence West pH^^.Ilol vi*h raid South lino to said centerline; thence South*?rly along said centerllns to a East line dr'-vn West throu|N‘ to ,h'» point of beginning parallel with said South line; thenes In* of beginning, ill oxlsti itiproveoerts or oncroichcjents. And the location of all oxlstir,: luildin,;s th.^reon. It docs net purpert to show other Scale: iJatc t o t 1" = 5C' 9-21-78 Iron sarker Ciordon it. Coffin ite^f'. 60^ Alvin N. itaheer Reg. fc.13295 Surveyors ara Civil Engineers Ncr.g la'te, I'innesota *( < /I ^ A' ‘.f i ^ .1 . f . - V i_ r%»-'*^''}4 >f CITY OF ORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO.____ CALLEO-IN SCHEDULED COMPLETED DATE TIME ¥-Z/-?y ADDRESS 4^4^' UJlLffuQ OWNER _________CONTR. It! § i II §s 0:s IS *2 I s 0 Uja: 1 a FOOTING □ FRAMING a INSULATION □ WALLBD. O FINAL □ PROGRESS □ OEMOL. G FIREPREV. □ PLUMBING Rl □ MECHANICAL □ WATER HOOKUP □ METER SET/TURN ON □ SEWER HOOKUP O SEPTIC INSTALL. □ SEPTIC MAINT. □ WELL TEST PUMP □ SITE INSPECTION □ EXCAV./GRAOING/FILLINO □ LAKESHORE/WETLANOS □ LICENSING D COMPLAINT □ FOLLOW4IP COMMENTS: ■ 3TtO]=> Oa.T)^lP ___^I C,(^ i S » jl/ Sg-r 3/ 70n I IaJAi c ^t Mg PTLL lu/ U,TA:^ P*|L6< c Jiij ^ /i^ue nV)p ADtshJ tr rr^T> rf / o i □ PHOTO TAKEN •oTni D WORK SATISFACTORY; PROCEED □ CORRECT WORK A PROCEED □ INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. PIsBSB call for the next in^iactkMi 24 hours in advance. Owner/Contr. on Inspector WMm Copy/lmpKtor*t FHa ^ V GoW Copy/SlM M^trt J W W:rmrmM } SFw V# i AAa.6U. U kJU aJT' <^13-Wf CL aJLc <^ to ^^JtljUcJ M 43 5 1 ^ J^L^I *tcK ./VcvCaA "t/jp ___ ______ «kas ----- i r, >' •- I • N '‘Bn ' i f * « : I. V A«r«r> ' * « W ■(.■ ' y . *• I i.a#» wi(ll«t ttk* o«f«r "-ht «t • -Vi . 4 wtX,-;.**" - N. ' i^. T*‘* fiV- f->- tt - ] ✓ k r •> fc-- /tAjp (AAcJ^j iAj^<^tL .... . ^^yZp . .,r''^7WU'yv''^r^K_ / /Q>T^._____ ...J<^. AA<Ji -yZZ cut. J^yt^uyi^. ^__ .... — ULCio* :—, r «. *.1 s. ►' / '■i. ■ * r. (. -f V* c ■’iiv:| > Am , TO: FPOM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Comnisslon and Council ^430 Alan P. Olson, Village Planner Jeanne Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator November 3, 1978 Alexander Holzer, 2677 Casco Point Road Conditional Use Permit & Varlp^''^ This Is a request to approve work already substantially completed. There Is a stop order on the project pending the outcome of this application. The work done Includes the following: 1. Erection of concrete block walls along both side property lines: zero setback on the north; two feet setback on the south. Walls 12” thick varying In height from 3 ft. to 4 ft. plus with regularly spaced concrete block pillars 12” sq. and up to 8* plus In height. Ue have been told that glass, plastic or wood fillers are planned to fit between the pillars. 2. Erection of concrete block retaining wall across the lake side of the property, approximately 3ft. to Aft. high plus underground buttressing; location approximately 60 ft. from the lakeshore. 3. Filling of 6” to 3' of dirt behind the retaining wall and side line walls and filling of an undetermined amount of dirt down the natural embankment to the lake. The latter filling was over the natural vegetation %d.thln 20* of the shoreline and Is at a SOT slope. 4. Construction of a new garage purstiant to a variance issued September 13, 1978, Application No. 417. The neighbor to the south, Smerllng, has registered complaints regarding the above work. The staff has the following comnents: 1. The side yard walls can be Interpreted to be walls or fences according to 31.433 and 31.434 which allow fences and walls up to 6' high in side or rear (street side) yards and fences ■ or walls up to 3>l/2' high In the front (lakeside) yard. No setback Is required unless the fence or wall exceeds 6' In which case the minimum (10 ft.) setback Is required. November 3, 1978 Alexander Hblzer 2677 Casco Point Road Conditional Use Permit & Variance Page 2 . i »■ 2. I m- 4 3. L. The side walls should come no closer than 10 ft. to the street line in front of the garage for visibility reasons. The side walls should not encroach the 75 ft. lakeshore setback as a violation of 34.202 prohibiting structures in the protected area. (I would argue that a 3**l/2 ft. high wood or chain link fence could be built within the 75 ft. setback as such a fence does not involve excavation or hardcover.) This work appears to be an ordinance violation requiring correction, removal or variance as follows: a) all work within 75 ft. of the shoreline b) all work exceeding 3-1/2 ft. high between the lakeside of the Holtzer house and the 75 ft. line c) all work exceeding 6 ft. high along the remaining side line. The Planning Comnission should make a policy recomnendation regarding the height of spaced pillars. Should these or should pillars in genera] not be required to be within the 6 ft. height limitation. The retaining wall is totally within the 75 ft. setback area requiring removal or a variance to 34.202. The applicant argues that this wall is necessary for erosion control. If this were the case, the wall would be at the base of the slope, not at the top. Holtzers have advised staff that the wall was constructed to permit leveling of the upper area for construction of a patio and swimming pool. It should be noted that the existing hardcover between 75 ft. and 250 ft. already exceeds the 25X allowable thereby prohibiting further hardcover without an additional variance. The filling requires a conditional use permit according to 31.700 and a variance to 31.830. Of particular concern is the dirt that has been dumped over the edge of the lakeshore bluff. There has been no evidence of hardship requiring this work. There has been no stated intention to do any additional %rork to stabilize the bank such as plantings or additional retaining walls. i ylMSi/ I ••'ll ■ mm, ^ r ♦ i ■■ r cm a Tiii - ^t-v- "^.*-l> (Z't: ►*' * ' <*Y November 3, 1978 ^ Alexander Holzer 2677 Casco Point Road Conditional Use Peradt & Variance Page 3 #436 Ad 4. owin' I- There is a stop order on the garage because of several ^ building code violations including control of roof water runoff. These can and will be corrected by staff action and do not require Council review. Assiiming code cooqiliance, there should be no reason to prohibit further work on the garage as this was already reviewed and approved at the time of the variance. 0'» Sunmary of Requests: Conditional Use Permit for Grading and Filling 31.700 Variance for retaining wall construction 31.830 & 34.202 Variance for side fence or wall height 31.433 •i'. A Staff Recommendation: The Planning Commission must determine whether or not the work done is reasonable and whether or not permits or variances should be' granted. To grant variances, specific hardships must be shown including specific findings based on the variance section of 31.830. If the variances and or permits are to be denied, early action is requested to facilitate removal prior to hard frost. Hardcover Estimation - 75* to 250' ; allowed: 2025 s.f. - 25X existing: 2347.5 s.f. variance: 322.5 s.f. “ 15X Hardcover Estimation with retaining wall allowed: 2025 s.f. ■ 25X proposed: 2509.5 s.f. variance: 484.5 s.f. ■ 23X - iL*I rmfnfu tk«• • • * • * / CITY OF ORONO, MIKMESOTA Land Use Application • * .• LOCATZOf OP PROPOSAL (or property) Address -c2(£ZZ£2L£^j2_j2L_4^xwr/ryr*.A0P/ Legal Description^^/ tf^OO 4.7/- APPLICAHT Hane/X /f/Pl- 7^/? Tel # Nailing Address ^^77 CffSCtP FT. \d/f7y7J9-T/? OWNER Name Mailing Address J>4>37/ Tel # Present Zoning TYPE OP REQUEST Subdivision $1504$SAot ix^tonditional Use $50 Variance $50 _ _ Rezoning $250 _ _ Riprap $15 ($65) PEE ^/6o.o^ Date Rec*d Present Use Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request Specify Ordinance Requirements _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ JA TfdV33 Biqplain your request and reasons for same #436 VARIANCE required _ _ Lot Area _ _Width extent of nonconformity _ _ Setbacfk Front Other, eaq>lain Side Rear Specii^ hardships to property - -» - > * / ^ /|/ > // / V a: t_. 4 ■ , ) ' V ^ X V •V ' 4 ’ 1 ■ • * . I Sfc > >1 ESOTA on * TYPE OP REQUEST Subdivision $150^$5Aot vo-^^tonditional Use $50 variance $50 Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($65) Date Rec*d By" FEE Use J/. Tfd A/! 4si ■i: '^3'1Cq3 Side Rear lrt*T^> SMi| ^"1 d * ■ » PR0P08AI, (or prop«ty, /?.n CWMBR Nane 6^Af/^ ' SS3^/ Mailing “ ^------------------_ Tel # Address Present Zoning _ ^ --------------------Present Use zoning Ordi„«c Section Relating to Request Specify ordinance Requlrementa «*’« CP REQtTEST Subdivision $150+$5/lo —k^^Ttonditional Use Variance $50 -- -Rezoning $250 Wprap $15 ($65) a^min your r«,ue.t and rea«,n. fOr ,a« /I- W variance required - extent of nonconformitylot Area Width Setback Front O****”# eaqplain' Side Rear Specif hardships property _ . . SUBDIVISIOH application Hesidential Otber, e3q>lain _______________________ ®o. of Lots ____ COMPmoBM, OBB Mm oiHm _____ __________ property in detail A^licatlon completed Plat in^ section Oonotructlon jrtane. 1* appUrabl. 5. 6. Certified Property Owner's 11««. « owners within oS') Hennepin Oo. De^ ie .?®A-An» « oept. of Finance A 603 Government Center anq>^g legal sized enveloBealeiA% on the above list na»ae ■ f- AppUcant'a Signature Z' >- ^ /%• X CX#ii#ir • 8i9natur# ^ _ tl / “ sr-‘ =ss2.“iSr— 5/78 » • op request ----Subdivision $1504$5/tot —l^''^nditional use ssn $50 Resoning $250 ---- Riprap $15 (^ss) PEE ^/4c.oa Rec*d '/a J/. 7?d Rear esq^lain . Ro« of Lots «>P«rty in detail ^ /• ^I>ICATI0H IS ion Sleeting) Property Omer*s Hot a# _• ®*pt» Of Finance rn»ent Center to eaai of the naM list, * 5/78 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE IKOrti«r tie Haim. Co. Finame MINNEAPOLIS to tie bott of my kiwwMie .^iy^zsynr-j/F I GOVERNMENT CENTER lEAPOLIS. MN i§j(b7 yn ERTY OWNERs/l/sT NAME ^^WDRESS DESCRIPTION LOT V ir"T> r> 3 n -t I pSA iT12^. Y>fV- .v^ \\g.s\\A\Av(V^ c,«co ^uo cAtco .v^.iiEar l ^ ^7^“CL z^ ft . Py=>N^ y\ vifi^vry&X’ 'W»ec)<io»cL, d-.'OevM^ At A\Vf^c&9^i.')^AVC\rN ■Qtofe r^>Ao^\^^^\nnexi\v^Q'Rip\t> g>g\o5 __ fVsrH^ A^ro Av)t 21 r\ tv'W^a^-ia. P/=\€/»,r^ Ufoyg^jc A 5^ , - .-.— ‘‘♦•CJnxi »ng^<Le^ ^: a£>^9 U>oV^ va.^ \^ _ rv2T^>c^\^ \Aol ~zi Kp Afse\ .VW i<iC ^\y 1^ O=\\A L/^ .V\<rC*^« J Cl<\e ai^3> \-o Cj^cjO , Qyoc» ^ Cji^^ K AMa^javoi^ SoV»5: ■SicOQ ti e4i I II I >1 'Zl & BLK.PARCEL ,3000 aioQ ?>a<^io MOO lOO. c3000 300 <b “Ao v^iecQ asoc: ?)% 1‘AD IMl PdSO. icoas <oQ«&S 'trv k?) HtOj V.m j| au«lKG FOR m. al££j;d£r holzer #436 ( Ik tat 10^n«78 Scilat * d/mtui -------rw - - - m r Id .t. • ♦»I 4 ^ ■ U ‘‘ . . .- ^ '. ,r .■ .* '■ ., • iJ •«■ ■-■Ifll A' GORDON R. COFFIN LAND tUnVIYOII AND PLANNKII sots WATKRTOWN ROAD LORD LARC. MINN. RSJM #43 47a-«l4l 10-31-78 *1 f s I* 4 ^ 4t r . • » , # • f - • Ht- • > r. i. )<^8. Ale:.ander Holzer 2677 Casco Point Road WaysaU, Minn. 55391 i (. ! ‘ / - . lear Krs. Holzert I ha>re shown on the drawing the approximate previous contours and ^e proposed contours idiich now exist as a result of partial construction of a retaining wall. I have looked at your property and the adjoining property, and in • If. ■ h ! ^3r opinion this grading would greatly reduce the chance r^'> for erosion of the top of the bank as has happened adjoin- r ing TOUT proper^* Seeding or sodding of the disturbed areas vould also be neoessaxy to prevent erosion of the SOlle » a ' t nr. ! Sincerely, ISark S. Gronbere. P.E. (/ • i • - 4^. , ro illtti*** '•.** ve^feeirHVer . ;w>6 V ttuc. KSG V* »'.3J ft ll a s t ; .‘k l9 ^ r'AdI ? .* ‘ 'i. s ’ % (c- i ** r ^ ’ tc ;y , ^ V • ' n f 11 n*i wf * . .f ' :• 4 * tf’« O * • Ti, lYtfm . < a • , a. #' ■ ^ ^ ^ .. v’Pfr: t p» / »o .^ I I: C*. MCLVIM M. SICOCL • •ONKv kOftacn • lONCT baimiows MAAOkO D. riKkO.JA. AkkCN I. SACAA THOMAS O. rCINSCAS MOASIS M. SMCAMAM SCOASB AKILkT MICMAKL A. SWiANOrr DAVID M. con stbamkm a . afcaum CNAAkKO A. MAYS NAMCV C. DASHKA kOWCLk J. NOTCSOOM 08CA0K r. M«OUNNIOCC* JA. FAKDAie r. AOSSNSLATT STSVSN D*DlAUYTKA LAW orriccs LEONARD* STREET AND DEINARO ISOO NATIONAL CITY SANK BUILDING BIO MAAOUSTTC AVCNUK MINNKAFOLIS. MINNESOTA SS40C TCLSAMONC ISIt) S9S-ISOO CASLB AODAKSSl*LKONO*Nrk N t'JV ,November 11, 1978 STKAHKM J. OAVIOSON STKAHKN A. LITMAN OAVIO C. ZALK COWAAO M. MOKASrSLOCA AOBKAT LKWIS AAAAOWS ALAN J. WILSNSKY KLOON J. BACNCKA, JA. HUGH M. MAYNAAO M. AATAICIA SCHArrSA MICHAKL A. NKNICH GACOOAY L.OAHL i I OKOAOr ■.LKOAAAD (iSfZ-lSSS| AATHUA L.M. 97988? CiSTT-lSSt| • CNCOICT DKIAAAO or eowMSKk lAKNK SCOTT NOV IM 1978 Nllliam B. Van Nest Mayor of City of Orono 3295 Carmen Road Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 city of orono Re:Alexander Holzer, 2677 Casco Point Road Conditional Use Permit and Variance Dezu: Mayor Van Nest: . <s • i • us After re-reading my letter of yesterday to you on the above matter, I realized that there might be some confusion as to one point which wao made. Hence, I am %^iting now to clarify that point. On page 2 of my previous letter, I discussed the implications of SS31.433 and 31.434 of the Municipal Code of Orono. That point which I had hoped to convey is that neither of those subsections pemi^iii (I II witifi erected bn any portion of the front yard. tached diaqr^^rith the outline in red was intended to illus- ration of those subsections.trate" Uiiiy LllU Aviation of those subsections. By my ccxnments and the use of that diagram, I did not Intend to imply that the remainder of the wall constructed by Mr. Holzer is permitted by the ordinances. Tn fact, there are several grounds upon which my clients oppose the entire wall. First, the entire wall constiructed by Mr. Holzer is a retaining wall behind vdilch and underneath which a great deal of illegal filling and grading has occurred. Second, the retaining wall is anchored to the property by concrete footings. These walls are more them single walls which are used to separate proper , les or preserve privacy. They are intstead intended to support ‘ie lateral force of the filling which has occurred. Mayor Van Nest November 11, 1978 Page 2 "4m \ The effect of the retaining walls, as constructed, is that they constitute a "structure** within the meaning of that term as it is used in the Code. S30.040. Therefore, since the retaining walls constitute "accessory structures", under S31.436, they must be no closer than 10 feet from any side lot line. Also, with respect to the construction of these retaining walls and the illegal alteration of the natural grade, it should be pointed out that no study has been made of the effects upon the drainage onto surrounding properties. The Holzcr property ban been made substantially higher than the adjacent properties and since the fill is apparently intended to reach the top of the main portion of the retaining walls, run-off may spill over destructively onto nearby land. Furthermore, v^en considering the effects of such a wall upon property values (as required by S32.340) and upon'aesthetics, it must be recognized that while the Holzers will not have to view any of this wall, the Smerlings will be faced with a harsh and imposing concrete structure along virtually the entire side lot line. Finally, I would note that the concrete block pillars must be considered as part of the wall for purposes of height restrictions under the Code. To do otherwise would be to engage in an ad hoc revision of the Code and would result in a situation «diere there would effectively be no restrictions on the height of such pillars or their proximity to one another. Thank you once again for your consideration of my comments. I look forward to discussing this situation with both the Planning Commission and the City Council. Very truly yours. « 9 LEONARD, STREET. AND DEINARO f Michael A. Nekich MAN:cb CCS Bruce D. Nalkerson, Esq. Louis G. Oberhauser, Esq. Mary C. Butler Walter B. Massengale Norman W. Paurus C. Paul Pesek Tom Frahm John Hammerel Gregg Hannah Richard Hassel Jo Ellen Hurr Gloria McDonald C. Steven Wilson Alan P. Olson * » * * 1 i j t. <**»**» - LAW OPflCCS LEONARD, STREET AND OEINARD ti' r AMOS S. OCINAMO MKLVIN M. 8ICOKL •lONCV kOA8Cn • tONCV 8ARAOW8 MAROI.O O. riSUO.JR. ALLKN I. SAftMS TMOMA8 O. rCINRCMO MORRIS M. SMKRMAN OKOROC RKIkLV MICMACL A. SWIRNOrr DAVID M. COR STCRMKM R. PrCAUM CMARWSS A. MAYS NANCY e.DRCMCR LOWCkk J. NOTCSOOM OKOROK r. MsOUNNiOLK* JR. PRKDRIC T. ROSKNSWATT « I vJ 1800 NATIONAL CITY SANK SUItOINO SIO MAROUCTTC AVCNUC MINNCADOLIS. MINNESOTA 8640t TCLKRNONR (SI8| 88S-ISOO CASLC A00RCSSt*l.8ON0* I OTCRNCN J. DAVIDSON STCRMCN R. klTMAN DAVID C. 8ALR CDWARD M. MOCRSrCLDKR ROSKRT LCWIS NARROWS ALAN J. WILCNSHY 8LOON J. SRCNCKR. JR. MUON M. MAYNARD M. PATRICIA SCNAPrCR MICMAKL A. NKRICM ORCOORY L.DAHL . ;1 November 10, 1978 sconoc S.LCONAMO (ISTS-ISSSI AHTMUR L.N.STACKT |lS77*IS#l| SCMKOICT OCIMARO |lSSS-ISSS) ^ A I or COUMOtL IRCN8 SCOTT William B. Van Nest Mayor of City of Orono 3295 Carmen Road Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 CITY OF ORONO ■■ I i r . ■ e if- ■< Re: Alexander Holzer, 2677 Casco Point Road Conditional Use Permit and Variance_ _ Dear Mayor Van Nest: On behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Louis R. Smerling, I am writing to inform you of the Smerlings* opposition to the grant of any further permits or variances for the Holzer property. I also want to take this opportunity to comment on Alan Olson's memorandum of Noveniber 3, 1978 to the Planning Commission and Coimcil on this subject. Mr. Olson's description of the work that Mr. Holzer has done thusfar on his property is substantially correct. A concrete block retaining wall has been erected, without first obtaining any permits or variances and in spite of the objections of neighboring landowners. Furthermore, filling has been done to varioiis depths over virtually the entire area of the lot, altering the natural grade of land. Such filling is not only violative of the City's ordinances in itself (§31.700), but it must also be taken into account when considering the concrete blocK wall. The wall is probably one foot or more taller'‘tif)an the dimensions given by Mr. Olson if we measure from the natural grade instead of from the new level which resulted from the filling done. I would disagree with the characterization of the earlier variance as being one for the construction of a new garage. It was actually for the reconstruction of an old garage and may have been violated, rendering it void. ^However, we do appreciate the efforts of the City in requiring that the ^arage eaves be removed and gutters be Installed, directing the rxm-off from the roof onto the Holzer property. ^-- - - - - -^- • •• • • M sS 1 Mayor Van Nest November 10, 1978 Page 2 \ . ^ In Conment No. 1 which begins at the bottom page of Oi»2"3%“”l"3rif“hrS?ono ‘^lng^C^ Section ?;^e^^?Mences end wall.”^ yards onljr not « exceed a height o^six .feet^ contrast, Section 41.433 deals o y heieht. The fact that fences which do not exceed 3-1/ Qor^ifln of Che Code end oiogy is not inadvertent, but result here is that ’>“^i:«jhrfn?rre^‘cs;urtf eiHi^lHi^nt si^es completely removed. > "A 2 t Any portion of the wall which is “ rt^wtificial t; r^S^lfrr^.'^lluSr-^frfiiUn^ SSutrilso be removed. and^ ''°The Slu^is'nSt^S^esSa^^^for e«sion ”c^tr2l!°rte Sc^rii^'hlf alieady be^^ Jherejs - J^j-e ShiSrhave e«? Mistediave been totally of Mr. U^is not reasonable to allow a person to Jship" »d uSii''?o hoS"SIS rtars^; be^y^TSpbci^lly on a lot of limited size. jmv variances or permits are granted to Mr. Holzer, they 1 • • > 3 Hayor Van Nest November 10, 1978 Page 2 •# N « In Coiment Ho. 1 which begins at Jhe bottom J"?® page of ^»»”;»^“"”3j®23rif“hrS?Sni Wng Code Section yard, onljr not ••fenw^ SS^n‘^hlc5jo°no*t\xceed 3-U2 fe« rrrLS?ed~^« di?2?t?5%|ter th^^ siM —i^tSrin^ iiS#i|rt-f orsi ^je^ completely removed. i L Any portion of the wall which i. rev^f'cr^ftfd iy lS^*liSlS;?.‘5iU?S“‘^!rgiun| also be removed. „orand» ’“^e Sliril'SSt^hSj'for "oeLi^^irSl^^he has already oeen exceeaeu; ™ then permit him to benefit from such actions. He has ai y received a garage variance in that manner ^d there U^^to ho5 mu?h of that may be.d9ne, especially on a lot of limited size. T£ anv variances or permits*are granted to Mr. Holzer, they should ba^oSSitioned on 5^®,3lm?grinf?icted £;%Sr^^M?‘i«en??o3a?nr33n-3S'3I S.'Holtefl workmen. .wHsu,..- itriHinani' • • •e ..'4- ' Mayor Van Nest November 10, 1978 Page 3 / Some notion of this damage can be gathered from the °? James Robin, landscape architect, which is attached to this letter. 0- *In conclusion, let me say that, in support of my client’s position, we will present photographs of the Sin___j___^_____mAot-’inoft iiTiH will elaborate on?U™iSS ’coLusio5 anraoEllcu'neStin^ »d ™ ‘5* ^ * situation generally, as well as specifically, on further ordinance -C, violations . /, i.Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this entire situation. ■'7^ ^ • Very truly yours, LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD r y MAN:cb Enclosures / Michael A. Nekich cc: Bruce D. Malkerson, Esq. Louis G. Oberhauser, Esq. w Mary C. Butler ^ Walter B. Massengale Norman W. Paurus C. Paul Pesek Tom Frahm John Hammerel Gregg Hannah Richard Hassel Jo Ellen Hurr Gloria McDonald C. Steven Wilson .. i •V *' 4fi. •• P * f ' ^ 0^ ■ 1^0 I ia * ^ f (c au.iKG Fca >aS. ALLJW:j£R H0L22R 'h < < .u .»|f, , 'V .V'*. •e »•»* » Iktet l&.n-78 Scale: — ^ m - - - . I • < • i m • •l •n • 1 I !; ) . L C c • f la.xxds.ca.pe a.rclxxtect 2 3 4 2 0 pax*k st^et * -.i f-Cn ■ *n . ' i % i 4 . r if ^ f) • * .-f- A. \ < T excelsior, ■ zxxixxxxesota 5 5 3 3 1 ■V- - U ■ ♦ r*. ; I .. t October 18.1978 Mr. and Mrs. Louis R. Smerling 2552 West Lake of the Isles Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 ; r, <, Dear Mr. and Mrs. Smerling I have the following observations and comments to make regarding the damage to your Casco Point Road property on Lake Minnetonka. My Information is based on a visit to the site this afternoon with you. The construction project in the neighboring yard to the north apparently has resulted In direct damage to your property and may have an influence on the value of your site and building. 1. 2. \ A The direct damage which I feel can be attributed to the neighbors actions is as ^ol 1OWSI Compaction and wearing of the grass surface because of its consistent use as a construction access. This area of lawn should be replaced. Destruction and removal of plant material, a) 5 large lilacs. These have been obviously cut off by a machine or axe in the process of excavation.. The plants which were quite mature will be difficult to replace because of their size and age. ^ Removal of small trees in the area of the lilacs. Damage to the trunks of the trees west of the garage should be repaired by a tree surgeon. Fill and construction debris should be removed from the root root zone of the remaining plants back down to the level of theoriginal grade. Failure to do this could result in loss of vigor in the trees in particular. All the plants have suffered a shock to the root system which should be corrected with a feeding program and pruning by a tree surgeon. Severely damaged trees and shrubs should be replaced. L ti ■ i «>1 /i - -T y•7'T'.-! i j PI « • .‘Mr. and Mrs. Smerling ^Page 2 r October 18, 1978 V There Is so«e fill or “JVs’relJ^dT^riitllr.l s’t'rulture will be even higher Sra"Shorf^ffi^ base of the wall. ¥ The ,.lue of the repair of these W lirgl«9e?" r?U^Tha &M io^d U a miniimim cost to.start with and variations from lhat figord •>'“"« “P^^ent once the repairs are begun. The extent of the devaluation your property will te ™«^diffic^t^to determine and should be considered by a J®*] JPPoJv of'historic structure, the design age of the house which places it in J^^® ®®*®J suitmer house and the marvelous of the building in the st^e of the Lake ”'""^“"5%!“'^; of age and quality, vistas of the lake all combine to create a sproial feeling^ot^age This is a quality similar to the current Homes and sites such as yours Twin Cities as well as other ®'^®” ^ae The loss of the plant material have a value. I feel. J’^rconstrilrtion in tSI adjacent yard may SSvr: "siSJuufnt'Sffrd rth^rolSe Of the property because of the "»ioj dha"|o^ in character. ^ ^ Finally. I would I'n^rseitilllJ^^rrS'^?™^^^ SlS3ie “il£rtn “il ?ft" iJgTcrpy of"5?s’u«ertJ rou?Tuorneis“!llImTv^ltbU ro ^eJ^it!, “el“if they feel that will aid them. Sincerely, Off) * • I j >{James Rdbin gcj Louis Oberhauser, Atty Harold Field, Atty '• .b It L f ■ ; ^ SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS i .'.r > This Is your introduction to the proposals. You should be able to make Individual conments pro and con. The developers should be able to discuss concepts and sense your reactions. You should not make official conmltments until preliminary applications are oaide and the public meetings are held. This Is particularly true when rezonings, conditional uses (PRD's for exaiq>le) or variances are Involved. Study the Issues. Let the public be heard. Think of the sketch plan as a work session with the developer to mold the product to the City's expectations. .1 'm&mmm. s>• ■ -<• . ^lE* '.i w 1 I i Hi ■ ^• H %• %« tvl.' li.. t ^ <5P 1 >ma ^ . .Vr‘‘ f ifcasiiM immiiiaA srr^ 4»f Ken Ghapman 2695 Shadjrwood Road Subdivlalon Page 2 ■m'Ot t * ‘ . --V PLANNING LSSION MEETING - OCTOBER 10. 1978 Planning Comnlsalon gave conceptual approval of proposed subdivision with the following recomnendatlons: 1.Horizontal division as opposed to vertical - only one lot to have ilparlan rights. Planning Comnlsslon should review Issue of two existing docks on lot. r 2.Easement for access road to detached garage be designated on new plan. 3. Surveyor to designate the following: a. 929.4 high water mark level b. 931.5 flood plain contour 4. Building sites for each lot be designated. » V \ X‘ '■ii-j 5k / \ ■ .V ■ / . / \ / -'um \/ i«Ml t % ^ M N ■una nm lostcni o. ciuk «!> IK UITS 24 iUI 25, »us^ ua MMMpU COUBtjf, KlIWMOto ■: .> #428 t ^' M '- >' OMerlpitMi U1 th«t portlM sf Lot 24 IjrUf ooyUo*oU •rlj of o llM ifoia porolUl to oad UC f^i a aiiUM BortlMooiorljr from tlio SoutKrcoUrlj l-oi J4| Olid all that portloo of iiorthoofUrlj of o U m dfOM poi«l. to tnd 90 foot diaUoi SouthoaoUrlj f2oo llM or Mid Ut 25, *fteoooBt to tho pUi thorwr oa nu aad of raror^lKtia offtro of U m itotlotror of fltUt la •r.*l for e^ld Cocal^, r.\ t€f •% , f .- ^ *4 *T foolai !• o SO* mu I Corioa S. rofriii Co. 5«i-*oforo tad fSoli Ufeo, MaaooiU ’-1 ■!L Mi - --m -K. I TO:Planning Connlsslon and Council /I?fr FROM:Jeanne Mabusth, Asst. Zoning Administrator DATE:November 7, 1978 SUBJECT: M33 - Judd Ringer, 2240 Wayzata Boulevard SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW The applicant proposes a subdivision of 57 acres in the northeast quadrant at the Intersection of Highway 12 and Willow Drive. The property is zoned RR-IB, minimum 2 acres residential. Mr. Ringer asks the Planning Commission to consider the rezoning of the 12 acre parcel along Highway 12 to a light industrial zone. The light industrial zone would be the location for Ringer's new plant and a possible industrial platting of three lots. The residential area will be platted into 14 lots, 13 with 2 acres minimum and the one containing 3.85 acres will be purchased by the neighboring property owner. Mr. Ringer is aware of the tight clay soils throughout the 45 acre parcel. He plans to experiment with the property through various controlled plantings over a three year period of time. Our problem will be if he goes ahead with the proposed residential plat before he attempts to repair the clay soils. We are bound by the septic ordinance to have each lot tested before final approval, '‘.he applicant must be made aware of the conflict. The two existi.:g homes will be checked by the septic engineer. The plat road is feasible at this point, as it appears now the residential lots will not be served by the industrial road. We will require a SO' easement for the plat road. The village planner and I made a tour of Mr. Ringer's operation in Eden Prairie. Staff agrees that his operation falls well within a light industrial classification. The plant in Orono w511 be involved in biological research as it relates to soils. The size of the plat will be roughly 10,000 s.f., the operation might at some later date Involve a greenhouse. They will have 15-20 employees. There operation does not involve industrial waste and the nature of their manufacturing will not demand a sprinkler system. A service road serving the Industrial park should be considered as opposed to three separate access points off Highway 12. I (A • V Oii'/ u > V •*' 4 /' Judd Ringer 2240 Wayzata Boulevard Subdivision Page 2 # 4' "li cu) O m f j> t' r <■; «f» In regard to the applicant's request to rezone the 12-acre parcel along Highway 12, the following alternatives should be reviewed: 1. 2. mm . . . i— Remain residential - 2 acre minimum lot size. Is this parcel suitable for residential zoning? ^ • If rezoned light Industrial, should City Investigate ways to extend sewer and water now or In a future plan? Should the City limit development to a type of use that does not require sewer and water? The latter Is the most feasible and realistic. This newly created district may not be based on a list of approved uses but rather a conceptual use whereby the future user will qualify by review of a list of standards or criteria, such as Industrial waste Involved, number of employees. Industrial design or type of Industry requiring sprinkler systems. The Planning Commission, I am sure, can think of many more. Will we retain the 2-acre minimum Industrial lot size for areas without sewer and water? ’ V I • *9 *1 le 12-acre parcel lid be reviewed: size. Is this investigate a future plan? ^e of use that ■Stic. This newly •St of approved uses uture user will or criteria, such mployees, industrial nkler systems. The of many more. lal lot size for ■Jr I«»TI0B op ^SPJSAi (or property) Address CIIY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA I*and Use Application • V/j /yli TTPE OP REQUEST Subdivision $150+$5/tot begal Description wares. . If. Conditional Use $50 OWNER Name ' 7(T/// Mailing - - -^ Address . Variance $50 Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($65) Present Zoning FEE 'A AS', a o Date^ec' d yo - -TpA Present Use Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request Specify Ordinance Requirements Explain your request and reasons for same VARIANCE required __ __ Lot Area _ _ _Width extent of nonconformity Setback Front Other, explain Side _ __ Rear Specif hardships to property SUBDIVISION application Residential Other, explain CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - exDla^n I "xpiain proposed use of property in detail Tm. MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION(Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planni«„ A ^lONy prxor to Planning Commission meeting) 1. Application completed 5 2. Plat map section 3. Certificate of survey of property sketch location and setbacks of proposal g 4. Construction plans, if applicable Certified Property Owner's list of owners within (300*) (150*)- from Hennepin Co. Dept, of Finance A-603 Government Center Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addressed to each of the names on the above list. DATE DATE Applicant's Signature Owner's Signattire Applicant her^ agrees to provide all info™tion required or ^ ^ ^ the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorn^ Pian^inf^^T*^^^ necessary to process this application and forth*... i J -• •f r / '* |4 *2/? C ;ft \ -^/7<f* vTtT I ^ /3^ ^ / / ■ji • ' .*< ^Pc / /Po PoS£=0 5 Pc Sc. JSA/T/F/t. • ^ -/ f«~- ■ .-ilj:-*- /ftttjU.fly f i - J^CHT y^'O. Co^i^jjRttfii Fi<? P. • •* • .• * « • 4 V P R U E N - RINGER 57 acres ' I 1040 #433 I W Mm 40 nn PROPOSED SCIE NT I FI C.....PA R K t$iW 5v##// 1 ^4/4#. l|^ • - I •___iiL 1 m t____m ® 0ll4< 0}»4f Htt- fe rIPtf OAMCLS ^ i\_____; stwccT m—71---------- ^ IM Seoersfr0nt 0/iu I'.: Planning Conmiaaion and Council 1 j FROM:Jeanne Mabuath, Aaat. Zoning Administrator RATE:Novenber 2, 1978 ■'k. SUBJECT: #434 - Fred Herfurth, 225 Morth Femdale Subdivision, Conditional Use & Rezoning f mi 5 SKETCH PLAN REVIEW k ' .4 Mr. Herfurth seeks conceptual direction for a proposed P.R.D. 12 unit subdivision of 6.75 acres off North Femdale Road. 'Rie applicant is applying for a rezoning of the property to R-IB from the present zoning of R-IA. Ihe density ratio stated In the application is .575 acres per unit, but the developer has not made allowance for the 50' private road serving the plat. This mi^t bring the density ratio below the minimum requirement of 1/2 acre per unit. The property has sewer and water, a single unit charge for each parcel. There are no designated wetlands within or near the lot lines. Planning Conmission should check with the developer concerning the disposition of the existing buildings, two of the accessory buildings violate Luce Line right- of-way. iKtHTS rvqui-' '-i » IWfftagit- of nwk.--r form.; ty .... — ?r<«rt_ ......Width ^ i/txfiitkit. V i ji Ljrf 'AJU Mliitltui li null r ’:" T wAnliA- i- # •*,— \ P.R.D. oad. The 0 R-IB Bted in per has B plat. Bquirement r, a single wetlands lid check cisting Line right- '... -- ^ ifvt. ““«« » «.c««a (o, p, Address *^•1 ®««crlption iPad oss Application — sax A “*** "'" —iim -^*^sa«U!Sajaa« Address CL o»auio«i -gj I —- ^•*‘lance $50 I V / -— *®*oning $250 n, w.y„„ ***^esent Zoning *•1 #^2i4Mo/ SSSgPfM «65) •^Uln your req,______ ■-^-2^ -----^^22^2!ll£oroiTioi^nsE i»o,„ y^RZAaCB _ Ar^ Width l..M.hip. to property ^ttacfc jront ®**«*;# «3g>laln"7 Side Rear -^OBDivisiotj application Resident!) °“'«'. axpialn ‘''^niOBM, os- . ------------------------------- "“• ^te J9'—»*< OSB AND OISbr - ~ - ^~ “EiM.120 2 propose us. o, I----------------— — ----------------------------- — IPKWTIAL district *»>Uc.tl„ *■ *® M«nnlnoV^*^“°*»Jai -Ap /Tl - " *■ 0 j^£s» 2^"" *»Uc«f, Blgustur. Slsnatur. O UTAard^... _ • - 434 ■<< U « • *« ■V- • f4.HM ¥ Si IlfifI fni— “4 CLMEII <L PETI % i". ;«4» ii M \ H t A #H3 i • . «mi I. FiEiiii 1 i • « *-•- — T -.nr^fk Jl -r * < : • i #434 • n t I #»C v^r* for “dchf.rd ritvjns tho ooutVovtt i/A of S'ctlon 36-110-23 i ^ V // #• it 4H5.9 W.J* r y\ E«*S.t • .t • >> • •!% ooK :v •I Ml kouJ^£ Imt #f 5K ' *tl -X ■■p I /: XW*« *f «r « t4 . N li«f *f sc V4 *f «c>v 1 V J Cortlflcet'' of Surv^: 1 hor^t;.* certify th't tM* ir r truo rnd co»y<^ct ror<r-»s»-»ntj ’tlor of r 8urv«T of Ih-' bounderlof of t»«rt 7»»rt of thn N^;. of ih' of o«ctibn V^'.13-^3 d*8cr1h'>d ce fo\- lowRt Cow.|^*ncinf it tl ' : rormr o'* arl.J !. of th« o^-i^: nV/ f 'oiit t-• 3 11:;-^ of scld N5,' of thr 3'.;, f*«t “*0-» or l«rp to tht lHy 15n** of ti;«* r.’.j-ht of vty of th^ Mnn^pot? ^Ilvry 3o; thor.c^ Ko'-thv««it»!r\y i.lor;i •-. 1«* I.ly ricJ;T o'* n • lino to It- incY^'*ctton wjt;: *• I5n? d-jvr. n-TTll-.l wltj- ru-. •'/•.' '*b«t »ly rr-? .-urod •t rirht on. l'»3-<‘roa ■* Tly Ho» o** o'ld o'* r.h-> 35%; r.» T iCO »lonr sri;' l;et- .''To*a *,.*•" 3 !5n*' of 'd V I .•tic I;1= dosorlMrt r''"’!''! I'n-* -,r • «v.1nT. t’'"-'On .'*»«t'nr. 1 f-»it setd o'* th'^ S f tj*'^ rf i*! • • •of •*OV^} f,i“ w ii Otif • * . r* « -• V I'i A ^Si1 iktO i» • n I *0* 1 >1 ■i .. *' - .c*. T’y ' ••*rr5rPt Hr.' :''«,11'1 vM;*-. KB; of the ?•;; tr r ; d<*t"nt ?/ *.t f«"t Wl^ **r{.r» tho •. Hn- of nr* theneo South r"-'!’'1 *'•?*> ccld »1 lin- rcc f--**.'} r* «r.o- «n r ;. ri.H. *:.. 1 >r u Ip 8-..-'iopcr crnt-r' .-/*.• to ’I lln-> o'* if K-; ‘ o’ t?-'' . tl-r.c anl<» i lln' to th-» pciir >f l-'r5r-»p, ; n.-c ’ 11 •»rt o;' -’■• j ; ^ct5on 3C-n:!-23 tn*'’tllol:; Coinnicjn#^ .-.t" tl.i* J.i corir*r o. s».16 ot ih^ 5<5i; thense -ly i.lonr f » fc llm of soli' i’iv of the ti%, „ore or T-no to the Illy l^ne of th-' <,f wry ©•* the ►3rn''*cv \J««terr Prllv*.' Co; th»nce oclf* l.’ly -fnit of v/r- ’Ir-* to Jib 5r.t'»p«ct1on vJt*" th- : Ht:« o<“ »i Id 5-%^ of the thor-je Mv .el jnr r.t M •: Hrr» to th^ yolnr of b«r<nnlnr; end of the location of »ai UdP.-.j inps t**'-i'*oM, *n:t rot ...f m.y oth-r vl.-.’bl* encrorch-n-'iitr, fron or on sp1>J Ip.nr.. T>;5r .•.urv»v la re.-’n crlv <r. connection wlt.h n nort/’cre lou.-> now belnj' rl"ced on the r.roi-ertv, ind no lictlllt'' 38 iPsutTid '’xc'rt to the holder of cuch n-.ortcege or other interest cc .uJred h;- r->» aor. cf push* rnor..rpr'*«. It understood end cpreod no mona'eent? hero l>een rlcced for jAe rjrr'or-* of e-trbl lis;.lr.f lot lines or boundory comert. ro Men pieced for j^e purpor-* c.... ^ Ditf? : : 1" • IOC* hifust 15, 10(>2 wrmo ■ CitO;rrmt ^ Wsio <:»• K^il«y, Jr.. 1.. , 1'A2 Eruo'^ II*?e« . i < . i71 J Cordon P. Coffin Ihf. ::j. c; :/. X*iL^f & K^i.L£Y, chrin'f»rs a cvt :'V orr Loof Minn«9cu. •5f*o n^mo ___. r . J ', ^ %: •'» i^?iP'^'’ /f •-V 1 ■>Vv. v-:Vv •#434 HIm %..}r ifl^>:>:: ^ '■ fj-j 9t r- DATE: ■a o»« Ai r* • =•... Planning Coanlsaion and Cornell #437 Jeanne Mabuath, Aaat. Zoning Administrator I November 3, 1978 SUBJECT: #437 Larry Osgood, 363 Willow Drive North Subdivision i-9 { f A SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Mr. Osgood proposes dividing 9.9 acres Into a four lot subdivision. All lots meet the zoning requirements for the district (RR*1B). The existing building meets all setback requirements from newly created division lines. Mr. Osgood has furnished a septic report for Lot B, but we will require testing for Lots C and D, the septic Inspector will Inspect the existing system on Lot A. The access road serving plat Is located at the edge of a desl^ated wetland along southern property line. The pre liminary plans should designate distance from road to wetland. A northern access would be out of the question because of the bridge approach and factor of zero visibility to north. mvx of 0* 7-^ - **■ qpf itti .7. ti •V M- f437 tor «!.•' fiiS ‘« ^ - ■' O>-*» •• ‘ lot « for the setback t. Osgood 11 require L inspect "**T‘* ^ K of a the pre- to !Stion Isibility *■■*" f OP REQUEST 1-9.1 Ccriptlon SEJ Ll^... Al>DT.Tr«1kttMn M ^ y TYPE OP REQUEST Subdivision $1504$5/ e -— Conditional Use $50 «.1U.« "—i^y r/. _ Variance $50 . Rezoning $250 Riprap $15 ($65) ’‘®i ^J^ZizUJUfI fee n J76 .C>c• A jLxii^ - - - - -— - -— ^JLULZSiJl Pr...nt zoning Present 1,-S^ Date Rec*d // zoning ordinance Section Relating to Request specie, ordinance Reguirenent. ^ Ocplain your request and reasons for sas» ^14^ required - extent 2-Mt^)t Area nonconformity Wi< ®P®cl^ hardships Setback Front Other,Rear srty SUBD^SION application Residential Other, explain Ko. of lots' CQNDinaiAL USE AND OTHER -explain proposed use of property in detail mihimoh haterial mbcessary <*tost be suiillt^S'J^r^ti ’ys"^^ 'S? APPMcatioB __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^^>Plicatlon completed Plat map section survey of property ■ketch location and setbacks of ^ proposal «»acjt8 or Construction plans, if applicable 6. PkTB_ ■Applicant's Property Omier's list of ^ers within (300 ‘) (*g«). ®* 'iMncoA-603 Government Center ««-PeS. legal sised envelopes (#101 - *kmer's Signature __ _y,*''«“*”*»rrator, city Engineer. r4«^r -required/^ request^ ho '■*»' .11.1 iiBi I rii t •.h I —tt4iMm$.Ii it - a »• «»• •• • (r-\ -- J __U- - ^■ ■ ~I-i iO . * **'*■ * -t ' 7^ •- ' ,J^4*>,v. i - . /W. ----- ^ ^ ^ :*'• ■••’ -..v.' v'>A> ;.JV. .^.». v;^'•^ 'l ^ Mwr4B.l MB > \ tk. 1 * ^ I J I 4 % fe liin# wf S HSt> / OM i M Jtnttn m$4c 2tr $ slU ; T' s< 32 s 'k X \ X « S{ I I m. * —ttHHifci — 31 I CLUFt 4. PCTCItSON. | \ 5^'-r-.r ji'wa »r"- .f I -n o*^ .«. ..I = Z=- -!!^1 gufi«gm-------------- J- -T —• Vv. w I l IS-. '-m W » f - ■ . **<V *- / «V J»^ I $ 15 *< « •^t •% I 4 « li .^.7> 1 I > ;;. #i#nf «r j /f Jc./ / OM l ¥ nhmm USiJc ijr lO CM « J#^iiCUl "‘“LAHe ill >’ $ •* S s K S;| 32 s i< '• S $ «t S5 •m W: » —IMtW/to — I I CLMCR J. PCTEHSON. | I ' i^; 0 \ ^ »'■ r-n hlj r i \ X lllf ol I «“* 1 4» « t ‘. J • 55 f * O *♦1: CO fMl <>Mwijgii»Cgin^ Alt: mwwnH ,ltapl.o( Mahifai l^iourcM A-*. *•, •*' ,v ^ WTh i ^ #If VWVKEHELD - CONRY REST AREA AT WILLOW DRIVE ^ j: i 0t 00 o>~