Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04-10-78 19 Planning Packet
AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 10, 1978 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:30 P.M. I. CURRENT ITEMS A. Action Items 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. #364 - Ben Dye - 115 Smith Avenue Variance - Rear Setback 4. Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 27, 1978 5. Discussion of Marina Licenses B. Sketch Plan Items 1. #363 2. #367 3. #372 American Rebullders (Fred Herfurth) • 2400-6th Ave. No. Subdivision - Preliminary Jurgen Stielow - 565 Leaf Street Subdivision - Preliminary Lloyd S. Kelly - 85 South Brown Road Siibdivision - Preliminary C. Work Session Items 1. #360 - Joe Whitney - 780 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision - Preliminary 2. #365 ~ New Horizon Enterprises (Mr. & Mrs. Dunkley) 2380 Shadywood Road - Conditional Use Permit Child Care Center 3. #366 ** William Taylor - 2227 & 2229 Shadywood Road Subdivision - Preliminary 4. #368 > Walter Wlttmer - 1420 Baldur Park Road Variance 5. #369 - Orville Grimes - 4480 Forest Lake Landing Variance 6. #371 - Richard Konerza - 245 Tonka Avenue Variance COMM/ss/OA/ - /trr//uJ - yMf/i /O. /99S VILLMOFOTONO W ».MI 3«3 " <.V- WLLUy T WILLS )lr. <i»(« CITY <)l' or.o.vo It* . *\ •. I • ^ I \t I • : . •*: “I * VILLAGE Cr 0ROr4O 5TAL BAY, MINNESOTA 55323 LAGE OF ORONO BAY. MINNESOTA 55323 • r *. V/: - r.. • \ ^ VI .. * i j ••• . * [: :*.T-7W! y;-y;\. Jurgen Stielow 2058 Shoreline Drive Wayzata. MN 55391 Davia 0. FilkinE 110 Snith Avenue ••'eysata. Itinneeota 55391 C Urr^~fj J. i: J. Etror. 110 Orrno Ci’chrrd lioad '.'a.vratc, .‘'.inrecota 55291 /.! .,3121.' • 'I: MOOAIM si. H1«|» ““IS* _________I__________fruA . ILLAGZ c- \L BAY.. f ^ w ILLA.GE OF ORO’"'^ VL BAY. MINNESOTA Lv r . .f'ILUGt Of o. AL BAY. MINNESOTA 5i>323 .'^fci.Lrd P. rr-.cj'.rtrc. P5» Cniith Avcr.ufe »t'.vz£+r, PirfiiCLotr. P. 0, Voi{ft 3j Smith Avenue Vfn.v2P.ta, f'inneEOta 5^391 Paul J. Schleich IGJ Oroi;o Orchard hoed '•ryaata, Ilinnerots >5391 "M3- K .rvi \ ‘ ~ —% MOOAiMUMVTy. "“IS* VILLAGE OF orrj.' ------------1 HKKIAIW lif ■13 ST.u BAY, 'A v>f Lrr.:th Avurue I!:rrerDtr? 5-53S'l 'ILLAGE OF OFOr-"^' AL BAY, MiNUEoOTA raOGUiM *~13« 2. J, Curlron 17D Crith Avenue VaysatP, !!innesota 5^391 i/lLLAGE OF ORONO fAL BAY. MINi.'SOTA 55323 WUUMMI—W> i Louie 0. Merchant 120 Orono Orchard TIoad *.:a;.-rata, ■'•'innerota S^'391 Cl IV <»!' <»f;o.vo I'l I I* I* n. N • ! M I . V l\M M»I •» . • •>-4. b rre-7’"« •! y/ i: I- T ^ !*- .i -M* I* ii CITY OF OROXO I’.O. UOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY. MINMSOTA 55323 Ben Dye 11 S .9mi f"tl Aifontia .^AvViL m-r7,= 0.1 3 Lloyd S, Kelly 125 S. Brown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 C>ITY OF OROXO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY. MIWLSOTA 55J23 Fred Herfurth 730 E. Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 TO:Planning Connnission 'oA FROM;Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator DATE:March 17, 1978 SUBJECT: Ben Dye - 115 Smith Avenue Variance - Rear Setback This property is located in RR-lB Zoning District (2 acre). Lot size and location of existing structures are non-conforming. Mr. Dye would like to build a 12' x 24* addition to the rear of his existing residence. A 50 ft. rear yard setback is required in this district. The proposed addition would result in a 3 ft. encroachment of the 50 ft. setback requirement. A variance of 3 ft. would be necessary for approval. Since the one variance is necessary I would suggest we address the remaining non-conformities. The lot lacks 100 ft. in width and 68,970 sq. ft. in area. The existing garage is approximately 12% ft. from the road so a variance of 37% ft. is necessary. I believe we could request the applicant to remove the existing non' conforming kennel. The following exhibits are enclosed: 1. Eidiibit A 2. Exhibit B 3. Exhibit C 4. Exhibit D 5. Exhibit E 6. Exhibit F - Variance application- form Survey locating existing structures and proposed addition Plat map indicating site location Property owners list (neighbors) Letters from neighbors with no objection (Backstrom. Merchant and Quay) Letter from applicant explaining proposal STAFF - April 4, 1978 Recommend approval subject to verification of septic system location and operation prior to building permit issuance. ■ ’ TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission #363 1 Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator March 17, 1978 SUBJECT: American Builders (Fred Herfurth) - 2400-6th Avenue North Subdivision (Preliminary) - Sketch Plan Review Mr. Herfurth is requesting approval of the subject 17+ acre parcel into 4 lots. Our current procedures include sketch plan review by the Planning Commission. Therefore, we will not be able to schedule a public hearing on this proposal \uitil the Planning Commission has a chance to review the sketch plan and direct staff to schedule said public hearing. The entire parcel consists of approximately 17.4 acres. The survey indicates 2 wetlands areas of .55 acres and .60 acres as conservation and flowage easement areas. The proposal as submitted consists of dividing the original parcel into 4 lots - each exceeding the minimum lot area and width requirements in this zoning district (RR-lB - 2 acre area - 200 ft. lot width). I'm enclosing copies of the following exhibits submitted with the proposal: 1. 2. 3. 4. Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Subdivision application form Property description Copy of plat map locating subject property Topography and survey of property indicating divisions as proposed 5. Exhibit E - Property owners list (neighbors) Exhibit D indicates the wetland conservation and flowage easements as determined by the surveyor. An additional 10 ft. easement along County Road #6 is also shown on the survey as are the drainage easements along lot lines and required setback lines on each individual lot. Copies of the subdivision proposal will not be forwarded for review by other departments and agencies until Planning Commission completes the sketch plan review. STAFF - April 4, 1978 Question? What is owner's intention with old house? Recommend that approval of Lot 1 be subject to removal of (or at least boarding up of) all existing out buildings. Access will have to be subject to County approval TO:Planning Commission & Council FROM:A, P. Olson, Village Planner DATE:April 4, 1978 SUBJECT:Jurgen Stielcw - 565 Leaf Street Subdivision #36 SKETCH PLAN REVIEW; This Is a proposed 13 lot residential subdivision of the former Andromeda property between Leaf and Bayslde. The sketch plan is an opportunity for you to review and comment on the proposal at the conceptual stage. tienj! for discussion:Wetlands & flowage easements along shore and pond; riparian access; Intentions for the existing church building on Lot 9 and foundation on Lot 7; should the road be public or private, and should it be gravel or paved? CITY OF OkO.’W, Mn^ESOTA 1‘^-PA Application _ jp^ lc Ja AL€ Date Z7»7fi^ ‘trtet.Location of Property: ^ S 7" f * ““ ---------------• • /jgal Description of Property:*^/£ AT/ACO lucuet^MiCUW' 'aosgggjMmwcDg *ype of Request:Rezoning Vari ance _ _Conditional Use Permit _Subdivision Approval Other )escfiption of Request: Ap^jcantJ^=vtj 'Tease draw or attach a ^etch of proposed structure showing the following: 1.Indicate North m 9 m 6. 2.Location on Lot •7. 3.Adjacent Street Names • •8. 4. ' Location of setback and use of adjacent existing building. 5. * Distances between ar^r’proposed structures and structures on adjacent property. Diiaensi'ons of proposed structure Preposed setbacTcs Zoning in force in this area Exhibit Submitted: - • • . . - - ap or plat shaong the property affected and all lands within 300 ft. of the boundaries r the property affec^d by proposed change. , Btractors or attorneys certification listing the names and address of the owners of ^ I land within 36^0 it. of the boundaries of t& property requesting the change or rezoning I those names appear on the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County. 3M.jPL.^fjroniij, 111 iiiiTim n niiiiini^. .llage recommendations': r.TF • — ------ i , -.3 , ^ - >0 »« • ---it - u«. i .. . • _:___________;__________. . • ... ^ ... _ •. • • ">y::\ • io "IfiM • . •• • • ' Y ••*.••••*.• r3 ’.V •I • ^ ■ r \ .•.:■.: . .•..I . \* ' *1 •• • • • \ ' ’ . -f I •**• I •••“ » •• • «# : •. A si ' ?'k-.S - ,-. ' ^ w ^ • i. .-.i- s* • r t)»1 •-■i ••1 It >K” V, s ^'•Vi -'5i-: :‘j^. - ♦ ' ♦ niNNLAHc'Llb, MM SD^JO/ PROPERTY OWNERS LIST Jf c J) _ _ _ _ _ _ _(^>U-)\^') NAME ADDRESS DESCRIPTION jKr\\ rr^vY\g^Ag\(^Jr 3^^ \_c>Ad V;epoA U&riUDor - - gy^ Sic/] K YvW^\nrygA^?C /SYNA^Orf\gArNf*K< ; 5^oc>'i's;^ I I !*0> ''fiS^fcTCNv^ptlk O^S-XN ^oc X)rs^r\^i :OL> 'Co'^Ors.T '5QQ£^< k, xA\V AV\oc3/b<D LoVjb bl£>¥^._ l,«. ^ ^ C. ForeK Y>>e.T Bs.A5'5i^’v\\ar 3Lo C3 Sr V£><Ng Nj^tiiu On KrAer&r . i\oo \jea.^ ,r\:ivj ><vi v.-gwYg> R^v isojt _wt\oA^y^ ___ Vea^r • ^SSS(<. V V 3vaG> t-o»t ‘5>t' X iCS>onc^ V^ _ y^vv\\VrtV^Oy jbc -•». <A«>k>w^ :,* « ^ otspy^::. SVsL _ a'jA.___ LOT L BLK.PARCEL qg^< J.<QQQ L^:£X ^iC S*5 '-' -3»5iOO ^d£^^l^S^ciSl ^. fY^x\d VSl'^C- S)/ Sc\ £ '^ti' <L.-c.lailadL'c.'A' 'J ___ . sa^ ^-a»v_^vA=. ^. >eo' 0^3.VJwyA sSTo Vr^rg \-g\Vg. 'g^^’gSLg) f-^-/C A -V ^ W-V XL _yTa^^:>\As> ■ .\A A l^Vrig- \Av V^-- iWyhcAk'idx' A'- - ,'^A\ '-cv •Ta A'-''''- L ,\(. \ '5Ia£:aa.QOX_ v.s^evAi l^vxc^ Ih\Vt x--A^ V-: A _ > ^ .*■■. ^ . \ V-o'css Lc\^ 5'A'=v & sc^ ^ £^od /ogQQ nooci (ji\££j /^44n '7i2jQ l>AOCl l6Led iinQ! . -V, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST V.o NAME ADDRESS , )yV\V£=\\fe. TTT I y Rrs,. K.\~. Kio' ^■Wo\>Q LOT BLK. PARCEL I V-oy\t^ Lofe?'s_5S_- Lq5C:> iOtiV- _Lo'tS>A^k\^ _ |<3COOLsi-voo. \XLA la!:iS£^ s56!c!__-l4Js5_ ______ f^U>rtg Vrgi!Y <::.»S£gE{: V I w l ^ t= • I i Ld^ \Q^U Lyg. ei^t Of~ 'SE><5^ I P Pi<gAA*E^' ^»v>v X«^-a e.^v 7>^\k\ icx^ cn£2!«>vn^q-^>-^ S^lcrt \E. U^ateT^- ]^^9t)ryj (o Uq^h iASiOCi. ■ \k ^e>a. : \k vvmI^ _j k y^oC VI'? 146^ -T----- r^f<VtTyOV>o> r> IViei^dlsfi'rs ___________ ' £ .U^^t>2.^ .>4t- \ r\Q S>^3^&L3 _"^oVj=^'f\d£Dq£^ \acc> ^Ba»fvoL& 6Vac ^ —m- ‘(^?fc > bO^V:.< rihe^^i»pey\-Ai^_oi t. c xc c>i Is -I ^SQC t- o vti Sp6^t Si- Vvi!6oVb:itfe„iQo5 z-a AVt^-Vji3±o£s. C3fqn>cc7<p r\P)\yDQJ*V(ifo_s&.^^ C-^ pc ^ W< PVfc V i-OAO^Lzie. \ ^\c6” A‘£ Kv£v\LV^yT0^ ^eci-V-Ssoc^Sl^ VracJc At \on K \?.b'8_ V v-jv RV?S ^'15l'~| \Tg>C^ H \''ife> hSQO !OOC ym.i (f» ----------------------------riDESCRIPTION 1 LOT BLK.PARCEL ti-mn, »'* •-*' *• >& c^icoo c<L\0<2) ____1- ----------—------ ------------- - i!i ^S_.<2^3Q; Cp v?jS o&> 5?co jbtoaSj ^-------------------------- =V\\ic_ O-^;^OC' i \k\ lOC^JV,\4a_a;' \1 44<bq \vl \ Art \z Vi'Jk^V_^.V.,\ ^—* _i <R U^^QG \7 kdpOC bo^ XOL j3:-- (3-_ z.a s M9oq i pcce: % fe\co102!? \^Sfe'R ---------------- j -i • ** • 1 ' • ' A.kfcOQ : \? N60C nsoo F pooc'' —----------< J - . 1 .. utrHKintni Uh HNANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST #367 NAME ADDRESS DESCRIPTION LOT A^o6^CXrS OrNlA\tg.^ ^\>r aoA Cl lor c^\ lo ^ ^VV-pA BLK. PARCEL I crrtijy tl'.l =R- kr, ^1300 f.v»4 f/ n>c-;entiMt h *- /’r-ifa I ? i . ~^r . n* ^ •• • IW ■mx^m P age \ OFKB - ■'h‘140 - 1'?B0 C 1>1V iPri:; NO - GOOOyu ADDITION AUD £!UE!D NO 203 OWNER KATHRYN M TURAHAH TAXPAYER KATHRYN M TURNHAM 501 E 7TH SI NORTHFIELD MN 55057 DATE OO/OO/OO P.REV OWNER iTECT/LOT NOT GIVEN TWNP/BLK tM ::1 ( ( C RNG »e - 41440 - 15B0 C PAGE 2 OF 2 DIST 00 SCH DIST 278 WATERSHED 3 ACREAGE METES AND BOUNDS 10 W 205 FT OF LOTS 12 AND iZ ALSO S 11 70 FT OF E 310 FT OF LOT 13 AND W 121 12 FT OF LOT 16 AND ALL OF LOT 18 ¥6 - 41440 - 2400 C PAGE 1 OF 2 DIV TRNS NO - 000000 DATE 00/00/00 ADDITION AUD SUBD NO 203 OWNER ORVILLE E KEIRAN ETAL TAXPAYER JAMES K MCCLEARY 777 2ND ST «204 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 yyinyy- .Vii i c PREV OWNER SECT/LOT NOT GIVEN 22 TWNP/BLK fe: ^ f] : ( V ; .••■.. ■c mm r. c VI ■■• ( RNG ¥6 - 41440 - 2400 C PACE 2 OF 2 DIST 00 SCH DIST 278 WATERSHED 3 ACREAGE METES AND BOUNDS 10 THAT PART OF LOT 22 LYING SELY OF A 11 LINE BEARING S 46 DEG 30 MIN U FROM 12 NE COR OF SAID LOT ¥6 - 41440 ~ 2500 C DIV TRNS NO “ 000000 ADDITION AUD SUBD NO 203 OWNER JAMES K MC CLEARY TAXPAYER 50-202008-7 JAMES K MC CLEARY 777-2ND ST »204 EXCELSIOR MINN 55331 PAGE DATE 1 OF 2 ©0/00/00 ■ ■ - - •. PREV OWNER NO I GIVEN «8 - 41^40 - 2500 C PAGE 2 OF 2 22 iWNP/BLK RNG SCH DIST 278 WATERSHED 3 SECT/LOT DIST 00 ACREAGE METES AND BOUNDS 10 THAT PART OF LOT 22 LYING NWLY OF A 11 LINE BEARING S 48 DEG 30 MIN U FROM 12 NE COR OF SAID LOT iiBsst'Sl Vir. |L> JW . mM . :•* : •• i.:* vy iiy;y TO:Planning Conimission & Council FROM:A. P. Olson, Village Planner ^72 DATE:April 4, 1978 SUBJECT: Lloyd S. Kelly - 85 South Brown Road Subdivision SKETCH PLAN REVIEW:This subdivision is a proposed lot line rearrange ment and subdivision resulting in three parcels where two now exist. Parcel A, 6.19 acres Including a drainage area along the west edge. Parcel B, with an existing house, 88,447 sf including some wetlands along Brown Road and up to the existing driveway. The area was holding water to within 18" of the drive on 4-4-78. Parcel C, with an existing house, 98,150 sf (up from 60,000 sf) including a drainage way along the west edge. Each parcel exceeds the minimum lot area, lot width and structure setback requirements. Staff has asked for copies of the torrens certificates noted on the drawing. I I believe three issues should be addressed: The relationship of this division to the other rec ^nt divisions to the west, particularly the Jackson redlvislon of the Kelly and Kelly division. Note that when the Kelly and Kelly division was first proposed, staff recommended a review of all of this property for continuity and good planning of roads, access, lot design, etc. Access is important. Parcel A at 6 acres could be redivided. I suggest further review of possible divisions and road location. The road should be an outlot with access available to all future lots. A real possibility is the connection of this road to the new cul-de-sac in the Jackson division along the route of the existing road which connects these houses to the nursery buildings. The "ravine" noted in earlier reviews is not that much of an obstacle. The wetlands and drainage areas should be identified and protected in the standard manners. Septic testing will be required on Parcel A, • ■' CITY OF OkD‘0, Mrh^^SOTA l£ind_Use Application Case Wo, . d Street.Location of Property:I Lc£al Description of Property: y<n&Tl \ S (Wame} Type of Request: IA aS'‘ • (MSt /Pr/ {AddressJ c'>3 iPnoncJ- Rezoning Va riance Conditional Use Peimit Siibdivision Approval Other lescfiption of Request:_______ ■ -.C, P./rp^Lj- (Applicant! .vtXj »• <. rf-y4/-.Oivne r) ~‘^X-f ( . 'lease draw or attach a sketch of proposed strueture showing tKe following; m ^ 1. Indicate NorUi 2. Location on Lot 3. Adjacent Street Wanes 4. * Location of sethadc and vise of adjacent existing building. 5. * Distances between ary'proposed structures and structures m adjacent property. 6. ' Diiaensions of proposed structure 7. Proposed setbaclts 8. Zoning in force in this area ^ • Exhibit Submitted: ap or plat shewing tbe property affected and all lands within 300 ft. of the boundaries r the property affected by proposed change.- 5Stractors or attorneys certification listing the names and address of the owners of 3 land within 300 ft, of the boundaries of tbe property ieq\— — property requesting the change or rezoning > those names appear on the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin County. • • ^ • • ••►’fihofcaiig—M4“'«#"pTOp5Tttjf oimins' tviilijji 300 ftr.' favuiluig 'rezoning or * ill age reconmend at ions’ ■kr ■JF. V --------------- —.‘fl-X IM#« f N^a S ec: 3: t'llt-R; 23. :// ^isL . il Ml • i . •; !i ' • ^ -i/ N% SCC« *<u^ ■..V^ VL *wm li • Lj' .i I-_' ^ I,: ■ Mi -yr » #/VJ^ #!l:^r /*/«# e ni'nttiHm I M^md0tA m$ nmsr 4 I 5*A.«y/'|K >v • .. V. s. •■ ,. WV-> I^ M g^ii - .^•»- 8i‘ iNr.. JJ. R;23. DESCRIPTION NAME ADDRESS LOT 1 BLK.parce I o<s.ci:AQ][:xOC :?x-l\n-95________ Plat 4i^c‘."i _ ' A\\\p(?oSb\Y^sDn ... • «*.S-kxl (L}i MxO^T^QS^> ; , i-. . . 1 r^Ql Kslki4^\e:4Xjn '.. •.< ■ • ■ •■• • ’ '*1 ^ 'j t ' 6 'f * • -. • “^ 1'.. i 1 |.-.___________________________________________J >lj ^ JL—Ai r^ —» w V • » ^\cVesA~V C\e\y^ ... i.. < • • U Obbo •.i-'tjo k:V.":..‘K .1 > - . w n(^ 1 1 . ^ V y V. X. ------------ V br^vw''t* '. "•. * •■'<•*/ S:Or\ M -1 1 . . •■'OibJ \ j j t > *.. .* V : ' # > f . • ^ / ff . f i 1 1^ i/ i^ .1 >' ..„ ------------------- L- \* > i* i x« ^*t *v ^ o - - - > ^ • V.0^..^ 1 ^ ^1 ^oSJ L-OTicrviv e\s^ •-4^4: tux>Xi^C-ScoiA- -- ooolaopj ----------------------------- ^ \^o V-avA So'^v^mK^o _ , L1 ^ ^ — — 1 i)1 > 1 • . 1 •Qd 'nod V ?=n OwA vM 1 ^v^Q.\lV^O \0^^1 -------------....Jl ...XPVci'G ^^'^r\~&5ox\'Ov i • L j ^"Xv^cbs. a.oc3cI MOo^ l(I** ,' *■9% *• *11 « 01 r: 1 * • * ‘ •J •' ' t ^ 1 ’1 it* • • * ' ‘^ *1 11" n* il* * ■*• 1^ 1 * • '. t! t. • t i -r r . .....-----------------------------------------------.,, — ------------------------------- - r I : i TO:Planning Commission FROM:Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator DATE: SUBJECT: March 17, 1978 New Horizon Enterprises, Inc. (Mr. & Mrs. Dunkley) 2380 Shadywood - Conditional Use Permit New Horizon Enterprises is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate a child care center and several other services at the site previously known as the Calvary Memorial Church on Shadywood. I'm enclosing copies of the following exhibits: 1. 2. 3. Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Conditional Use application form Survey of property Sketch of property indicating approximate location of structures and parking Plat map indicating site location Property owners list (neighbors) Letter from applicant explaining operation of facility - attached to this letter are several letters from others endorsing similar operations 7. Exhibit G > Letter from State Department of Health 4. 5. 6. Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F I would suggest we review the proposal during our work session to determine if any additional material might be necessary. After receiving the data necessary, I would recommend we schedule a Public Hearing with regard to the proposal. PLANNING COMMISSION - March 27, 1978 Mr. Dunkley was present. He reviewed for the Commission the various child care programs they plan to offer. He also indicated they would be interested in obtaining a conditional use permit for accessory use of the church for rental by groups for weddings, receptions, movies, plays and at times would include alcohol on the premises. It was noted the property would have to be rezoned to B-1 if the intended use will include alcohol because that would be the only zoning district where a permit could be issued for alcohol. The Planning Commission indicated they would like additional information pertaining to the use of alcohol on the premises. Mr. Dunkley stated he would like to check further into the possibilities and requirements of allowing liquor on the premises before a public hearing is called. The Commission addressed busing. Mr. Dunkley informed them they have worked with the schools to drop off the children at their facility. Jim Olson, City Engineer, suggested the applicant locate the egress and ingress and the traffic pattern of the busses. JOE WHITNEY - 780 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision (Planned Residential Development) - Sketch Pi Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION (Sketch Plan Review) - March IT, 1978 Planning Commission reviewed proposal. Two alternates were submitted (P.R.D. and preliminary plat). Developer requested some direction as to what design the Commission might prefer. He indicated a desire to utilize the existing road as an access to the other proposed building sites. The Planning Commission made several suggestions including moving the access road to simplify platting of the property. The Commission did not Indicate any great objection to the P.R.D. proposal. They dld» however, suggest eliminating one building site for lack of dry buildable area reduced by the area of the access road. The Planning Commission also suggested the developer investigate current and projected use of existing utility easement over Lots 7 and 8. Also requested survey Indicating location of existing structures with reference to existing and proposed lot lines. Also suggested developer submit perc tests and location of primary and alternate drainfields for adequate septic facility for each lot. Applicant to prepare revised plans and submit for Planning Commission sketch plan review. STAFF - March 20, 1978 The developer has submitted revised proposal (Exhibit G). A copy is enclosed for sketch plan review at the next scheduled Planning Conmission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION - March 27, 1978 (Sketch Plan Review) Mr. Whitney was present. The Zoning Administrator reviewed the revised plans which had been submitted since the last Planning Commission meeting. He explained the request is for a subdivision rather than a Planned Residential Development. The Commission advised that the road should be addressed as a separate parcel. The Planning Commission called a Public Hearing for April 24, 1978. It was suggested the location of the existing shed should be noted on the plans. Also, that a review shouLd be made of soils and drainage. Mr. McDonald indicated that some testing of the soil already had been done. r WILLIAM TAYLOR - 2227 & 2229 Shadywood Road Subdivision (lot split) Preliminary Page 2 #366 Lot B 1. 2. 3. Area - 10,680 sq. ft. Width - 50 ft. Setback of existing residence from newly proposed lot line 3 ft. PLANNING COMMISSION - March 27, 1978 Mr. A1 Quello, representing the applicant, was present. He informed the Commission that the Taylors have lived on the property since 1925 and that there are two residences on the property, one of which has been sold to another party. Also, there are two sewer connections to the property. The suggestion was made that Lot 4 be combined with the north % of Lot 3 to make two bulldable sites and request rearrangement of the lot lines. Mr. Quello stated he would discuss this with the applicants prior to scheduling a public hearing. The Planning Commission was concerned about creating two new sites, neither of which would comply with the lot size requirements in that zoning area. ' TO:Planning Commission & Council FROM:A. P. Olson, Village Planner DATE: April 4, 1978 #368 SUBJECT: Walter Wittmer - 1420 Baldur Park Road Variance REQUEST:To remodel and add on to the existing home, particularly on the lake side in place of a former screened porch. Also shown is a large deck extending farther toward the lake. VARIANCES REQUIRED:34.201 - One small comer of the porch addition encroaches on the 75 ft. lakeshore setback. The deck encroaches to within 64 ft. of the shore and well in front of the adjoining homes. SPECIAL NOTES:The home is a converted sumner cottage on a 50' x 190* (9500 sf) lot and is located 4.23 ft. from the west lot line. There is no foundation under the existing porch and questionable foundation under the remainder. Remodeling in excess of 50X of the market value ($14,600 f 2 ■ $7,300) would also require variances to 34.552, lot area and lot width. i cm OF ORCNO, MINNESOrA Conditional Use and Variance Appli( LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property) % Address r-f/K.'^ Legal Description /^.-7 te^ _ APPLICANT ))IanB U'^J-7/f' /l,T7.'y^/e_ _ _ _ _ _Phone f /^ Address Ji'o ^ ^ J /✓_ _ _ _ ^ ~ i OWNER Nam /O Mrr/vjr^________phone Address A /f/ATAT_______ Present Zoning \ CL _ _ _ _Present Use «• TYPE OF REQUEST Conditional Use Variance Wetlands Variance Riprap A FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Council Action Date Approved DeniedZdiiBg Ordinance Section Relating to Request Speci:^ Ordinance Requirements /«4 />rpa f/z Acre- - 2Ll^ 90...?^ s.Je I/s' U-t- k\J4k Ifln' Uffwtyp‘Tg77Mf.<-'2S:^ Explain Request Relative to Requirements Lc4 Aeea I ^isk L l )// Extent of Non-confbrmlty /.^^V f^acA. f7S *?S SieJ^LjARD ^c^lbACK-S^*77 /^4- \J0:JU^ So' UlCtrskon^e tJ Hardships to Property CYour reasons for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit CA/klAleT' Jm/ /f^fiiSe//7 K>/(^oat./rry u/rAf ^/=- Sjcja4AfJ/V<? /7 — MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR OOMPLEIE APPLICATICH (t4ist be submitted 1 eedc prior to Couaicil Meeting) 1. Application conpleted 2. Plat Meq> Section 3. Survey (Sketch in proposal) \ 4. Certified Property (Vmer's List of owners within (JOO ft7) (150 ft.) - from Hennepin County Registrar of Deeds J5. $30.00 Fee Date Signature '.T^ -»V ' . r. <!P •*\ •• •s \^r>sr C o' \ •> \ \ /Ir.rf o;»o> n^ 4m<d » \ i^‘ 1 * ’ •( j ; A. 2 / «v • * '. -»> ir-y A: ’^.. t / V s. / * i «b / ’t 2ssT^ r f«/ / A i fm /^/h h f //// / iL^ / '»sf;^ 7^^ ■ '♦^o »//// / / jy/ / ^ / / /^ iL/ oT ' i i ^ Y^ ^ ^ / A / ^ / / / ^ / / / /^ ? /.^ /.9 A® 0 u / W / ^A^ ’^i « I Oo <0 #-^, -"o' i? HCf f «DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAME ‘ ^ tr\\. OT^c^KH o ADDRESS Oro c DESCRIPTION X‘<s,j>^30 iiasi AlA£)toh\ \ - \ >4— r, . JAMtS f £l3cia£xA£tvas s-jrrt ? -^us$£-lL At'. Se./1 SAi-OutC /; U'^^A/ec Z^aV-J e-Asey ^c', /^pA ,>r ^kt^ssrA-u^vf AVsx- LOT BLK. X‘S7?f/ ~r----- ^'s. £'Jrr. . s-s-iCzt Scet^^6 -/AtEf:, rtA. S'S'JXy £:>a/a’^ /"aak,/^m sirzxx^ L-o so —‘ ^ a j (p J _ 1 3.. L 9 ( PARCEL Qaoc /QLi 11 LUa<2£' \ Itaoq \^ 1 iiaoc! MlLiLtm }(4^\^(DC in ^ m M^lQL iq •-iJfOOr^ H^gp- O /QO |CC*^ onC^ •n^ t Q— • |f»5t f t «* fC ir* rtf'jvfti T!;rmy•. ti - *1^3 ——■ f- 1 TO:Planning Coimnission & Council FROM:A. P. Olson, Village Planner DATE:April A, 1978 SUBJECT: Orville Grimes - 4480 Forest Lake Landing Variance REQUEST: To add onto the existing home, size unspecified. SPECIAL NOTE:A lot line rearrangement approved by Resolution 867 on January 23, 1978 established this lot as a sanctioned building site. The existing building meets side setback requirements, but does not meet the front setback re quirement. Market value is $13,400 meaning any work more than $6,800 requires full conformance. If all setbacks were met (by a new structure, for instance) no variance would be required. VARIANCE: 34.452 - Front setback required 35 ft., actual 10 ft., variance 25 ft. ^ % I RESOLUTION NO. 867 A RESOLUTION APPROVING REGISTERED L.AlvD SURVEY NO. 69 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision plat by Bernard Reiling, the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting’regulations of the City, including: Creation of a private driveway easement serving both parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City*of Orono hereby approves Registered Land Survey No. Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1.The aforesaid plat shall be filed with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before July 23, 1978, together a certified original copy of this Resolution, and executed copies of the driveway easement document. 2.Outstanding sewer special assessments will be proportionately divided between the two parcels according to front footage, and dwelling units. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that ^ent, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City or Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 23rd day of January, 1978. William B. Van Nest, Mayor ATTEST: WaitedR. Benson, Clerl^Administrator i - V «• 1 • ^ j r I •1 y K/^^ypr<* ___________ 4i - 1 3.i \ 9 i ■4 4 I 9LJ * % * li I.» i. ■ c fi• • i It t: /1 • 1 -__i----1~ •** 1 V ^ 9 ■ m • ’■,'. . v.^j 1 '“* TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission & Council A. P. Olson, Village Planner April 5, 1978 SUBJECT: Richard Konerza - 245 Tonka Avenue Variance #37 1 REQUEST; To construct a new house on this vacant property. Zone RR-lB 2 acre unsewered. VARIANCES;34.842 lot *a and lot width, front and side setbacks. Requirements: 2 acres (87,120 sf) and 200 ft, width, 50 ft. front and 30 ft. side setback. Actual: 12,525 sf acre) and 100 ft. width; 35 ft. front, 10 ft. and 37 ft. side setbacks. Variances: 74,595 sf (86X) area, 100 ft. (50%) width; 15 ft. (30%) front setback and 20 ft. (66%) side setback. SPECIAL NOTES:1) The adjacent lots 5 & 6 are also vacant though owned by another party. If all 4 lots 3-6 were to be combined into one building site, a lesser lot area variance would be required (25,050 sf - % acre - 72% variance), and no lot width variance or side setback variances would be necessary. 2) Other houses on this block are located on lots ranging in size from 12,525 sf to 18,750 sf. 3) This area has had a severe septic system problem due to the soils and relatively dense development. No septic information has yet been submitted for this lot. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Every effort should be made to develop these 4 lots as one building site rather than 2, and even then the lot size is questionable in this zoning district. No variance should be considered without proof of septic system acceptability and operation. 41* a ***1 *?« '*' t iJ^ , . y -J l«i>l $J , 'N • !•«. \f • • 0% • w *•;•» 0•• 1 • >*^ *% • • 1 i.f V ' ' \ 1 *4 > «. ^ • r. -r .■ .• i i. j -r i V • .i #371 » *. V < M A* Ccrtificti'U* of J hereby certify th::t t’ilt Ir e tn;e and correct ru':roaor.tatloi; of 8 riTvey of t^'c boundarler of l/-t» : anu i,, "Kiybido Audition to ly/:o ;i.r.netonka", am c:‘ tho iocjiicr of a^.1 iuii-int’Sj if bpy, thorio: . !t does not rrui oort to rl.o-- otrter irorove; r,-nts or encro» cnrit;nt:'. Set le Dte o 1" t 30' Iron ntrV.c dor; n . .offi. fV^TTTTva^ •- r r or ciriL ^Idi.avr iSr.nvzc\'A ii•}< -‘<^, A • ' "' . ■#371 . . > I' V^v .. ■'A ■J- »’ r.;^ '4a 4c/ 4^ /l«^^ ^ • ' •' / /'* /' -' v/ ^ py- /m' ct; »>y>^ «?t?6 icrrJeA. • |i^ i.^J awottio ,0 ->^ V[^ kdu! ^__^ I;':#-' #37 If '"■y-Q-(.%JrL Wm.Wi' ♦v-. -ll»V' • . '■ •.;. -1. '• •'.‘■N 1 i m “w. t . ♦♦* ► %M4^ uJo 2^L JcU, V^yjL;: x-t-p ■* f>wu./ ✓Tu<v^l-X.tT4Lrt-42, jU ju ^icw-LrC >^»-4-«io. C«vxix^:iiX4?lL o-w-<C M^^fpJL- yjsdju^iif^ixy^, r > t f ^ -4^ . ^tt y ■■■ •■ >/ •■.»■»*<-- iW -»V<..■•:»♦, , *.., ., , C.pf A."' ^79u..\ yj -.. f* .b'" jU‘4- teA^V 4,\;' ■l / '-i ^ A4/ rnuAy .Vg 11 • i. . >• ■V^, V *l' / V::?^'^2|, ' V^’ •■''I :> - ' •4 --*i| 1^ ,i^->.- 4 ‘ mm\ »<C55« £t DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 7/ ■--------------------------------------/ -------------------- NAME ADDRESS A f l—A DESCRIPTION LOT BLK.PARCEL :>wB wi:).a^3 3 .._(Fli^t / -vy )-----^—#-----/—/—^ -----------------------------------— De v/»c^cJV+N P.M ic/dry CLi^<^(^nD P.C .fi. V \CIL'J hPiSk ''O 0£k^ £Tyz7 At-VfocH Ahc\ Sc, ShiiTff -** / ^ f % ••z lie mRet- /»,2.Z2<: npL —UA«:trMiNi\ > I T/o /s/ Ti:) Z —pAi Kl fl- ___(JRL-fi-r V/vao) / ' A “ <^L/i}c£r 2 e>o?c: <S£MtUi TCHK]i\^//-13 R/4A£A^iv/'2-36 TctiHfi Mtf — ■— ■ ■#—'-* /y-/d.6!ZS SCOTT C ■ (n^LJmyl r 2 2.<r nHHA AMP /-Z.3 (^ns' '^£S,T6L££f?r ■2./ 6c P^2/M ixw) //' u ~ -------------------------------:-------------------------— ’ f 3 / i Z?3o5 y^ti >1 ^■ateR.M. tVD\iM Rr i j /-^ A'_5-' tl •( II ^ / V OCoO n /st-6R£H W.SOKie'PA *5^r^ir/\0t c Zh^ TChlKfif AviL.7-;Z_Ar N t-rt Kt” >:> 5 4 6 t • «%A« #<«*#«# A » a J 39.220 39.221 39.222 C 0 C (d) The subdivision involves the extension of nunicipal utilities. THE SKETCH PLAN Purpose and Requirements 1. Purpose. The Sketch Plan is an initial presenta tion of the subdivider's intention and serves as the basis for conceptual discussion between the city and the sub divider. 2. Requirements. A Sketch Plan Review shall be completed for each proposed subdivision prior to the city's accepting any Preliminary Plat application. Sketch Plan Application. Detailed application and drawing requirements are established and listed in Section 39.260 of these regulations. 1. Class 1 Subdivision. The Zoning Administrator shall review Class I Sketch Plans on a no-fee, no formal appplication basis subject to the following exceptions: (a) The Zoning Administrator may require Planning Commission Review of a Clas I Sketch Plan involving unusual circustances or topography or when the sub division classification is in doubt. (b) The subdivider may request Planning Commission review of any propossed Sketch Plan. (c) Before the Planning Commission review*- mts Class I Sketch Plan, the subdivider shall file /vm^Cftte application and pay all fees as required for review of Class II and Class III Sketch Plans. 2. Class II and Class III Subdivisions: The Planning Comfii'iRgien shall review Class II and Class 111 Sketch Plans based upon the subdivider's formal application. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed. Complete applications shall include the following: (a) Completion of all items on the Sketch Plan application form. (b) Map 1; a location map. (c) Map 2; a half-section map. (d) Map 3; a certificate of survey of the property, (provide 10 copies if this document exceeds 8 1/2 by 14 inches) (c 39.226 39.227 V.. (o) Any additional inforir.ation rc-quosted by the Zoning Adrrini strator or Planning Co:rimission. 3. The subdivider shall file a conplcte Sketch Plan Application with the Zoning Admini- least 10 days prior to the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting at which the proposed sketch plan will be reviewed. 39.223 Sketch Plan Review and Recommendations !• Sketch Plan Review; The Zoning Administrator and/or Planning Commission shall study the Sketch Plan taking into consideration the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the best use of the land being subdivided. Particular attention will be given to the location, arrangement and size of lots, the futher development of adjoining lands as yet unsubdivided, and the requirements of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 2. Recommendations to te Subdivider. After reviewing and discussing the Sketch Plan, the Planning Commission and/or Zoning Administrator will advise the subdivider of the specific changes or additions, if any, which will be required in the layout, and the character and extent of required improvements and dedications which will be required as a prerequisite to the approval of the Prelimin ary Plat. The Planning Commission may re.iuire additional changes as a result of further study of the subdivision in final form. Said approval shall constitute authoriza tion to prepare and submit a preliminary plat application. Appeal to the City Council. Should any subdivider wish to appeal a recommendation of the Planning Commission to the City Council, the subdivider shall, within 10 days of the action by the Planning Commission, file a written apeal with the Zoning Administrator on forms provided for that purpose and pay an Appeal fee according to the current ffic schedule. Upon filing of an appeal, the Zoning Administrator shall have 10 days to prepare a report and place the appeal on the agenda of the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting. The City Council shall review the report and apeal and may concur with the Planning Commission or may instruct the Planning Commission to reconsider the application. Effective Period of Sketch Plan Review. Planning Commission recommendations concerning any Sketch Plan shall remain effective for 180 days after the date of Planning Commission review. Failure to file a complete Preliminary Plat appli cation within this time period shall be construed as formal withdrawal of the proposed subdivision. Renewal of any proposed subdivision after this deadline shall require a new Sketch Plan application including application form, material submittals and fee payme.nts. 39.230 39.231 C 39.232 THE PKELIKI?,7-.FV PLAT Purooso and P.eauirc-rr.ents. 1. Purpose; The Preliminary Plat is the second stage of the subdivision review process. During this stage, the subdivider details his proposals and the city details the platting requirements. All basic platting determinations are made before the city council will pass on the Preliminary Plat. 2. Requirements; The subdivider is required to furnish detailed surveying, engineering and legal infor mation sufficient to ensure compliance with the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning Code, and other local, state, federal, watershed or conservation district regulations. A Preliminary Plat Review shall be completed for each subdivision proposed prior to the city's accepting any Final Plat application. 3. Prerequisite: A Sketch Plan Review by the Zoning Administrator and/or Planning Commission shall have been completed within 180 days of the filing of any Preliminary Pat application. The subdivider shall be prepared to address or correct all problems, concerns, violations or pertinent comments included in the recommendations made as part of the Sketch Plan Review. Preliminary Plat Application. < Detailed appliation and drawing requirements are established and listed in Section 39.260 of these regulations. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed. 1. Class I Subdivisions: Complete Class I Prelim inary Plat applications shall include the following: (a) Completion of all items on the Preliminary Plat Application form. (b) Map 1; a location map. (c) Map 2; a half-section map. (d) Map 3j a certificate of survey of the property, (provide 25 copies if the document size exceeds 8 1/2 X 14 inches) (e) A property owner's list and envelopoes for notification of neighbors within 350 feet of the subject tract. (f) Any additional information requested by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission. (g) The Preliminary Plat Review Fee. L 2. Class 31 Subdivisions; Con-i?lete Class II Freliir. inary Plat "epplications shall include the following: (a) (b) (c) (a) (e) (f) (g) (h) Conipletion of all iter.s on the Preliminary Plat application form. Maps 1, 2 and 3 and all other information submitted for the sketch plan review shall be considered submitted for the preliminary plat review. If chanages have been made by the subdivider# new maps shall be prepared and resubmitted. A property owner's list and envelopes for notification of neighbors within 350 feet of the subject tract. Kap 4; 25 copies of the Preliminary Plat. In areas served by public sewer and/or water» a plan showing the existing service tops and the proposed connection sizes and locations. (Provide 25 copies if the plan size exceeds 8 1/2 by 14 inches.) In areas not served by public sewer, an on site sewage treatment site evaluation report for each lot under 5.0 acres gross area, and a copy of the current compliance inspection report for each existing on site system. Any additional information requested by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission. The Preliminary Plat Review Fee. 3. Class III Subdivisions; Complete Class III Preliminary Plat applications shall include the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (- (g) (h) (i) Completion of all items on the Preliminari- Plat application form. Maps 1, 2, and 3 and all other information submitted for the sketch plan review shall be considered submitted for the preliminary plat review. If changes have been made by the subdivider, new maps shall be prepared and resubmitted. A property owner’s list and envelopes for notification of neighbors within 350 feet of the subject tract. Map 4; 25 copies of the Preliminary Plat. Map 5; 25 copies of the Utilities map. Map 6; a soil survey and report by the Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District. Plan 7; a soil erosion and sedimentation control plan. • Plan 8; a vegetation preservation and protection plan ^ ,1 « 4.VSupplementary Information. Any or all or tne supplementary information requirements set forth in this subdivision shall be submitted when rc-quc'Stod by the Zoning Adn-inictretor, 39.233 C (1) Proposed protective convenants, (2) Statement of the proposed use of lots stating type of residential buildings with number of proposed dwelling units and type of business or industry^ so as to reveal the effect of the development on trafficr fire hazards# and congestion of population. (3) If any flexible zoning application is contemplated or necessary# the subdivider shall file a concurrent flexible zoning application. (4) Where the subdivider owns property adjacent to that which is being proposed for the subdivision# the Planning Commission may require that the subdivider submit a sketch plan of the remainder of the property so as to show the possible relationships between the proposed subdivision and any future subdivision. In any event# all subdivisions shall be shown to relate well with existing or potential adjacent subdivisions. (5) Such other information as may be requested by the Zoning Administrator# City Engineer# City Attorney# Planning Commission or City Council. (j) The Preliminary Plat Review fee. 4. Application Deadlines. The subdividei: shall file a complete Preliminary Plat Application with the Zoning Administrator at least 30 days prior to the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting at which, a public hearing can be scheduled. Staff and Agency Review of the Preliminary Plat. The Zoning Administrator shall coordinate the review of Preliminary Plats by all appropriate city staff persons and governmental agencies. 1. Referral to Planning Commission. Upon receipt of a complete Preliminary Plat Application# the Zoning Admini strator shall place the application on the agenda of the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission shall then begin reviewing the proposal. 2. Public Hearing Notice. The Zoning Administrator shall schedule a Public Hearing for the first available Planning Commission meeting. Notice of said hearing shall consist of the address of the property and a brief description of the proposal and shall be published in the r c officitil nowcj:r:oc-r at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. V.’ritton notification of said hearing shall be nailed at least ten (10) days prior to all owners of land within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the boundary of the property in question. 3. Referral to City Staff; The Zoning Administrator shall refer the appliation to all appropriate city staff personnel for review and comment. Written evidence of review and recommendations from the Zoning Administrator^ City Engineer and Finance Director shall be entered in the minutes of the Planning Commission Public Hearing. Where appropriate^ review and recommendations shall also be entered from the Public Works Director, Chief of Police, Fire Chief, Building Inspector, On Site System Inspector or other city personnel. 4. Referral to Park Commission. Where the proposed plat includes provisions for the dedication of land to' the site for public parks purposes, trails or jointly used recreational facilities, the Zoning Administrator shall refer the application to the Park Commission which shall review the proposal and provide recommendations to the Planning Commission before the close of the Public Bearing. 5. Referral to other Agencies. The Zoning Administator shall contact other government agencies or jurisdictions as may be appropriate to seek staff assistance, information and comments as may be applicable to the proposal. These agencies may include, but are not limited to, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District, State or County Highway Department, local school districts and neignboring municipalities. No official action will be requested of these jurisdictions until after Orono Council action on the preliminary plat application. 6. Public Notice Posters. The Zoning Administrator shall place public notice posters on the property visible from each street or closest public road announcing the subdivision proposal and the time anc place for the scheduled public hearing. Said posters shall be placed on the property at least ten (10) days prior to the scheduled planning commission public hearing and shall '-'emain on the property until the City Council passes on the preliminary plat. 39.234 r c PI ann ijTj Cor-lssion Rev lew of the Preliminary Plat. The Planning Co.t.iti Lsion shall study and review all Preliminary Plat applications. Particular attention will be given to the location, arrangement and size of lots and blocks; the location, width, length and continuity of streets; the topography and ecology of the land; sewage disposal; traffic; drainage; public services; the further develop ment of adjoining I'.nds as yet unsubdivided; the require ments of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Land Use Plan; and the recommendat'ons of the City staff and other governmental agenci s. 1, Planning Commission Public Bearing. At the advertised time and place, the Planning Commission shall hold a Public Hearing for purposes of public information only. This hearing shall not constitute the "Platting Authority" public hearing as rerquired by Minnesota Statutes Section 462.3757, Subd. 3. The Planning Commission may require that comments from the public be in written form. The recommendations of city staff and governmental agencies shall be entered in the minutes of this public hearing. At the discretion of the Planning Commission, the public hearing may be closed or may be held open for additional information. 2. Planning Commission Recommendations. After the Planning Commission has reviewed the Preliminary Plat and the testimony and exhibits submitted at the public hearing including citizen comments and the recommendations of the city staff and other governmental agencies, the subdivider shall be advised of any required changes and/or additions. The Planning Commission shall recommend approval, condi tionally approval or disapproval of the preliminary plat within thirty (-30) days after the date of the regular meeting of the Planning Commission at which the public hearing on preliminary approval including adjourned date thereof, is closed. The Zoning Administrator shall return one (1) copy of the proposed preliminary plat to the subdivider with the date of approval, conditional approval, or disapproval and the reasons therefore accompanying the plat. ■i I « ' u. 0' ■ 0 V' t cl.VI # m \ « ♦ » •t.\J0 A;-, ' I'’' '■'''*'*-.v' ' ?->^!fiS> j#:i s': fi':. f- *-■ *• >' -;immm K- K K.#-^.1 P." •f.v. # &: K, f - "/•••S’ >z.-:- 'i .*;•■' V V •; / :dr#- •••.•>< ■? i- -./ .1:; vj - :a^ i • •%I-,- '3^r . - •46ri.v / • . * m • \' ^-.*v jY .’'S r-Si '^iw-A*::.; ' ' ^ 'X^‘ Merniit 1 AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 24, 1978 COUNCIL CHA>BERS -7:30 P.M. I. CURRENT ITEMS A. Action Items 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Call to Order Roll Call #360 - Public Hearing - 7:30 p.m, - Subdivision 780 Old Crystal Bay Rd. So. - Joe Whitney #363 - Public Hearing - 7:45 p.m. - Subdivision 2400 6th Ave. N. - American Rebuilders #368 - Walter Wittmer, 1420 Baldur Park Rd, Variance #371 - Richard Konerza, 245 Tonka Ave. Variance Minutes of Regular Meetings of March 13, 1978 B. Sketch Plan Items 1. #367 - Jergen Stielow, 565 Leaf St. Subdivision - Preliminary 2. #380 - Philip Rusciano, 2340 S. Watertown Rd, Subdivision C, Work Session Items 1, 2, 3, 4. 5. 6, 7, 8, 9, #373 #374 #375 #376 #377 #378 #379 #381 #382 Dennis Holmquist, 135 Tumham Rd, Variance John Perkins, 1265 Elmwood Variance Timothy Gagner, 740 Tonkawa Variance Hennepin Co.-Vo, Tech,,2940 6th Ave, Conditional Use John Swanson, 2785 Casco Pt. Rd. Conditional Use Bike/Hike Trail, Baker Park Reserve Wetlands Variance Edward T. Johnson, 1340 North Arm Dr. Subdivision Jack Safar, 925 Partenwood Rd, Subdivision David Butler, 4685 No. Shore Dr. Variance II. INCOMPLETE ITEMS 1. #364 - New Horizons, 2380 Shadywood 2. #366 - Wm. Taylor, 2227-29 Shadywood Conditional Use - Subdivision TO? FROM: DATE: Planning Commission 6i Council A. P. Olson, Village Planner April 4, 1978 n SUBJECT: Walter Wittmer - 1420 Baldur Park Road Variance REQUEST:To remodel and add on to the existing homo, particularly on the lake side in place of a former screened porch. Also shown is a large deck extending farther toward the lake. VARIANCES REQUIRED:34.201 - One small corner of the porch addition encroaches on the 75 ft. lakeshore setback. The deck encroaches to within 64 ft. of the shore and well in front of the adjoining homes. SPECIAL NOTES:The home is a converted summer cottage on a 50' x 190' (9500 sf) lot and is located 4.23 ft. from the west lot line. There is no foundation under the exit ting porch and questionable foundation under the remainder. Remodeling in excess of 50% of the market value ($14,600 A ^ A A. .A ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^T 2 =» $7,300) would also require variances to 34.552, lot area and lot width. PLANNING COMMISSION - April 10, 1978 WORK SESSION Planning Commission expressed approval of addition but not deck as it extends too far into lakeshore setback zone. Also expressed approval of repairing existing porch and steps which encroach lakeshore setback. r •f- !7- 7S^ A ^36S" ssMIa Entertainment ^ Center One Valley'fair Drive • Shakopce, MN 55379 • 612-445-7600 if > i - April 13, 1978 > - i;: Planning Commission City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Members of the Planning Commission: In accordance with >c..r .I'hes verbally given to me at the Planning Commission meeting on Anr»l 10, 1978. I am, by this letter, reapplying for a variance in accordance with the plans that you reviewed at the April 10 meeting. The property is at 1420 Boulder Park Road. However, In resubmitting I herewith agree to delete the front from the lakeside of the home and further agree that the steps that I reconstruct will be no larger In length, width or height than those presently existing. Since the April 10 meeting, I have spoken with Mr. A1 Olson from the building inspector's office who Indicated to me that this was a proper method to resubmit for variance, and I herewith request that action be taken on this variance at your next regularly scheduled meeting on April 24, 1978. Thank you for your attention In this matter Sincerely, Walter R. Wittmer Vice-President TO:Plnnning Commission & Council FROM:A. P. Olson, Village Planner JL DATE:April 5, 1978 SUBJECT: Richard Konerza - 245 Tonka Avenue Variance REQUEST: To construct a new house on this vacant property. Zone RR-lB 2 acre unsewered. j 4 VARIANCES:34.842 lot area and lot width, front and side setbacks. Requirements: 2 acres (87,120 sf) and 200 ft. width, 50 ft. front and 30 ft. side setback. Actual: 12,525 sf (% acre) and 100 ft. width; 35 ft. front, 10 ft. and 37 ft. side setbacks. Variances: 74,595 sf (86%) area, 100 ft. (50%) width; 15 ft. (30%) front setback and 20 ft. (66%) side setback. SPECIAL NOTES:1) The adjacent lets 5 & 6 are also vacant though owned by another party. If all 4 lots 3-6 were to be combined into one building site, a lesser lot area variance would be required (25,050 sf = % acre » 72% variance), and no lot width variance or side setback variances would be necessary. 2) Other houses on this block are located on lots ranging in size from 12,525 sf to 18,750 sf. 3) This area has had a severe septic system problem due to the soils and relatively dense development. No septic information has yet been submitted for this lot. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Every effort should be made to develop these 4 lots as one building site rather than 2, and even then the lot size is questionable in this zoning district. No variance should be co;isidered without proof of septic system acceptability and operation. PLANNING COMMISSION - April 10, 1978 WORK SESSION Applicants present and indicated possibility of purchasing Lots 5 & 6 to create a ^ acre building lot. Rocommonded septic test prior to next meeting. TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission & Council A. P. Olson, Village Planner April 4, 1978 M O SUBJECT: Jurgen Stielow - 565 Leaf Street Subd Wision SKETCH PLAN REVIEW: This is a proposed 13 lot residential subdivision of the former >ndromeda pv ,ercy between Leaf and Bayslde. The sketch plan is an opportunity for you to review and comment on the proposal at the conceptual stage. Items for discussion:Wetlands & flowage easements along shore and pond; riparian access; intentions for the existing church building on Lot 9 and foundation on Lot 7; should the road be public or private, and should it be gravel or paved? Planning Commission 4-10-78 Planning Commission reviewed sketches indicated some objection to substandard area of lot 10 Bl. 1 and setbacks of existing structures from proposed lot lines on alternate plan dated 4-6-78. Suggested developer revised plans to meet minimum area and setback requirements. Indicated pref. rence and conceptual approval or original proposal. (Plan dated 3-27-78) Staff: Developer will be submitting revised plans for second sketch 4-18 plan review CjiY of 0*/0?JO, MnWESOTA % • * . •.*• • 'trtet.!>x:atiori of Property: iT ^ jr 'jgai roscription of _..l. >• "-auat.|N_jkiao v^. LcJa Date Xl-7^ «5 ItlJ(_P}ione} • • • “ype of Kc-quest: __Rezoning Variajice 'escfSption of Request: ^:--~ • ^ (Appl.icantl ••» tc • ■ A _____Conditional Use Peiinit „X.Subdivision Appioval Other '». -I. *-. (_0.vnerjr-^iri . . __ • • • • # •lease dr;vr or aUach'a'slietch"of'pT^posed s"ti\ii:CT«ong: 1. Indicate North . • .* * 2. Location on I«t 3. Adjacent Street Nanes . 4. * Location of setbadc and use of adjacent existing building. 5. Distances betv.X'en any preposed structures and structures cti adjacent prupeity. 6. Dijivensions of proposed structure 7. Pju]x>sed setbacics 8. Zoning in fojxe in tbis area Exhibit Submitted; •• • z • BP or plat showing the property affected and all lands witbih 300 ft.* of the”boundaries r the property affected by proposed change. tractors or atto^cys certification listing the names and address of the a.vners of land vr^in 390 ft. of^^ie hcKUi^rres of the property rei[uesting tJie change or rezonine those names appear on che record; of the County Auditor of IJennepin County. • • ;U>^gw-<iB^fH^n?.nfi jrnpn rTir, cr mej jiihUTiil 300 fl'l* r.Trpj •T-Tartanrtf J.llage reconrTiendat ions: \ - • ^ • fh- .X V I ■ .«:f.i t i* ‘•’X I •'"Vt ■ - '‘r.H. 1 - --r • '’•••• r.vf:?!‘'crl . •• V‘. • J.-: --l -'C-‘:c .•-.vr ?‘A*. ,> • •. • ^ \ ‘ _;^b __f J jggt. • ■-------->1't N-: • n/^ :j V .rirrr-:M Iri- •• C»r - \1^|t HC554 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAME ,, ^5(Q_,_3 iQQ. COYY'^oci2i(L\ ADDRESS (v\a\z. 4 PA-A?.rCivt fer-X^V: '^_r'~c Aci^V:-^Vf. ClVst* (o W<Ae. BSx L'c x V d Wrvr\roooGa\jor\ Cfx^*.-^'^.txe^ 13 /hx^sXyfT\t^A^VO (t ! <a03YOvOniSoavO [.}^(l>o CG.V\ OrorO DESCRIPTION U>.S:c,Lo V j5 Cirvis,^>€A C'^jc^.Ov ^.1 ^oA\.Vjac£o\: dV^^5D_. I . \ ^ ^ -Cav . . » •3^ icst i^\ . 3'-oO • f\S,V s y ’C,VoAq^ V.-=Kj^ -bSi-Su C'^S-£:<Na V'-Ve, ^y£»'b(iD(p Rv-v ^C5)t x:r\l\ V\ C?.^^^. L\oc^ ViiCvci \-t?^V£, 3'^'% St-. A:'^t^<sSo''Oci'l^O<503. _ &\n&^-fc__ E> '/s- ...... ______________________________ d^oM^i.yWifc \U ..V3.V.SOV ^H-.L ,VcV\\ ^oVY^^^)"^vcs^^'^ ;<•.\vk,r . ’*>■>>■ 9"^ 3*'0 LOT BLK PARCEL 0^00“ lOCyOi 1^ ia\o nsLc <Nf • U- XV-. t." N *1 o^- lob I “kv t]t. ip :tk^^f2k<^./sA 3 \ .aVf-=- \AeV<2 i.. (p\aE 'Aiqoci) j Loop- II ,_>- |Lo\.-b 5'A‘?r'!S Vkj \ Xs•tiS V U ,\rj^ V' ;‘> I. •‘♦vV ^ &'"|T- \ l^OQ. i6(-cOI 16^0 \,Cit| W^SO liOO lOiiO_ 1^00' |90Q_ MC554'DtPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 ^ PROPERTY OWNERS LIST W ^ ^ ^ NAME c\\i A\^CXZh B..WoV)^\r .... I ‘ ^ 5^:OOre,^V::LNJ\evv ADDRESS K.\^. u c> •-<* H'' t^VC\c2^:3V^e\'^V_______. ^ ,,_^..scp Lc^ \O^JL\ D(NA\p.'c.\le.x'c4c^'iT s-'"- DESCRIPTION •,* • »‘.'. .« »i Lots. '5__ Lo\s> \CiH- W___ L0\:S> \9SVV2> V-CsV&.S—S IH K 1 /^ '= .VsT'VS. ‘Si'o . t!\^ jS\ C>!^v^i:ONp^ 4 t^)rNO ,'§.'6^V . . t^CL^HeVoS - Kos?»>. ^ r-N I V/ \ S'icA vS.Uste.^- GU.T^v CN Poon-no ^ V—vzrf^Nio?'^ ^OC^V l % :7jl c^Vd^ Vv^ tSo^ tdlAQt.a r------- ^ j2^k&x.U:^^st.. \ ilNie.'C C^L.Ci^'^ F«aA^ V:i ricd*? U^rxA ‘^■-^\“c> •SS'A'Lp Q.U-sV-c-^ \ Vo\V Av^.V-or^oA, Gee 'cwe\A I)\ y G.\~c\\ / 'V'rVG'iA \V> - AdA-r 5 V \iV O ; •Ta 'c/IjO^ nGc>\-ar<dv> :5\'£b^‘-\^60C5'l iTheitpc Rsd?S3c^;t\^\t lf^v30^-1 oV* \zi ?^ocSc t \vA!60^ ho^ b I cd? Z^cXz h A?c'\cVjd (L'^tA^) \^\J^ A 'Tcz^xcVi £______ Vc\C£ £_______ LOT \ I .5L l2 3LK. £3 VO v5 Lp i2 Id.n % PARCEL c^iOOS^i^\oo oiAdQ <S<^QO. 2>&5iS>_ 3900- ^Qss: ‘TSOQ 460C 4ACO ■§ '2 s ^oo. d'SScS ^9CQ dccc p-5\CO \a 6-S'V NA' S^OQ 4UD \v>oc:) ■:jsqc:i ^000 ^367 --------- 'T LOT 1 BLK.PARCEL j ............ .......53CDJ V,^4od 5QGOJ ( ( c ( c ( ( c ~ 15B0 C PAGE i>iv (pi'ir NO - eoeooo uofE AL'On I ON AIJB .iUBL* NO 203 GWNER KAI11F':VN M lUKiiHAn TAXPAYER KAiTlRYN H TURNHAH b 01 E / 10 ^ ^NORTHFIELD ON 550b7 1 OF 2 00/00/00 PREV OWNER .VECT/IOT ¥ ii ■ NOT GIVEN fTJNP/RLK RNG 41440 - 1500 C PAGE 2 OF 2 DIST 00 S'CH L'li’T 278 UAIERoHED 3 ACREAGE metes and hounds 10 W 205 FT OF LOTS 12 AND 1i AL^O S 11 70 M OF E A10 FT OF LOT 13 AND 12 FT OF LOT 16 AND ALL x8 ” 41440 " 2400 C DIV IRNS NO -- 000000 ADD ! r I Oil AUD surd no 2’.m- OWNER ORVILLE E KEIRAN ETAl. IAXF'AIER JA iTES K liC'CLE.i.RY 777 2ND ST *204 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 U 121 OF l-OT 1 8 PhGE 1 OF 2 date oo/oo/oo PREV GUNER SECT/LOT N01 GIVEN 22 TUNP/HLK ^ _ 41440 - 2400 C PAGE 2 Or 2 DIST 00 SCH DIST 278 WATERSHED 3 ACREAGE METES AND BOUNDS .. ^ 10 THAT PART OF LOT 22 LYING SELY Ur A • 1 LINE HEARING S 48 DEG 30 ilIN W FROM 12 NE COR OF SAID LOT >(U 41440 - 2500 C PAGE 1 OF ^ DIV TRNS NO - 000000 DATE 00/00/00 A)';, r-- : AUD SUPD NO 203 OWNER JAMES K HC CLEARY taxpayer 50-202008-7 JAMES K MC CLEARY 777-2ND ST *204 380 EXCELSIOR MirIN 55331 REV OWNER - ^ I -t'H; SECT/LOT DISI 00 *8 NUI liJVtN 00 C PAGE 2 OF 2 22 ik'NP/HLK F’NG SCH DIS? 2/8 WAIERSHED 3 t-gE (D I hS and f Ol'f'DS ^ , 1C IHAI PARI Ur LUI 72 LYI.‘G NUl Y OF A 11 I.IilF HEARING S 48 I'EG 37 FiN W FROM 12 NE (OP OF SAID LOT / / ^ o o \ TO: Planning Commission and Council FROM: A. P. Olson, Village Planner DATE: April 20, 1978 RE:Phillip Rusciano, 2340 Watertown Rd, Subdivision SKETCH PLAN REVIEW ^Ut)! casement sho.,m for access. The property is not sewered and IS not assessed even though there is a sewer ease ment through the north lot. Zoning is RR-lB. Each lot meets the area and width requirements. Lot 1, 163,068 sq. ft. (3.74 acres ex- ft7 including easement to rear lot). Lot 2. o/,312 sq. ft. (2 acres+ including creek). may wish to see Lot 2 increased in area slightly to allow for the creek area. • co I i. TO; FROM; DATE; Bruce D. Malkorson, City Attorney A. P, Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator March 3, 1978 SUBJECT; 73-1 Easement Rusciano - 2340 Watertown Road Zoning; The property as platted has 5.76 acres and is approximately 325 ft. wide. RR-lB ^one requires 2 acres and 200 ft. lot width. Therefore, this parcel could be divided once into two lots with the sewer easement having no effect upon the platting. If the property were to be serviced with the sewer and rezoned to R-IA, the parcel could be divided into 5 lots each exceeding 1 acre and 140 ft. lot width. Assessments would have to be levied for lateral and unit charges. The easement would not affect the platting possibilities due to the shape of the parcel, the minimum zoning requirements and the easement location. As-built location; I walked the line today and compared the manhole (sewer centerline) locations with property corners ana the proposed easement description. My recommendation is to have a surveyor accurately locate the as-built pipe location and provide a revised easement description accordingly. 7 iV- m \ I ?r. 1 • ■i^ TO: Planning Commission and Cou ncil #3^3 From: H. F. Muhich, Zoning Administrator Date: Re: April 18, 1978 Dennis Holmquist, 135 Turnham Rd. Variances - Lot area and width Exhibit A - Application for lot area and lot width variances for construction of new residence on subject property (sub standard) . Exhibit B - Survey and sketch indicating existing lot dimensions and proposed location of new residence. 1. Lot area - 43,990 sq. ft. 2. Lot width - 165+ ft. 3. Proposed rear setback - 58' 4. Proposed front setback from access - 50' Exhibit C - Part of section map indicating location of subject property. I've added the dotted lines to indicate approximate location of the means of access to the property. The unimproved access road starts at the south end of Turnham Rd. and continues south to the Luce Line Trail. At this point the road turns east along the north border of the Luce Line over what appears to be parcel #5800 to the east end of parcel #3360 (indicated as the Lathrup Co., Inc. property). At this point it crosses the Luce Line trail and continues south to the subject property. This road seirves as the access to several other neighboring residences but no documentation of their existence has been submitted. The property is located in RR-lA zoning district (5 acre or 217,800 sq. ft.) Approval of this application would require the following variances: 1. Lot area - 173,810 sq. ft. 2. Lot width - 135 ft. 3. Rear setback - 42' 4. Front setback - 50' No perc tests or soil reports have been submitted as yet. t'A #373 continued -2 Approval should be contingent on several factors: 1, Documentation of access Perc tests Suitability of soil Primary and alternate location of drail fields in relation to proposed location of residence to eliminate future confusion. 2. 3. 4. '1 cmr c? Clan, )iDoss5rA Uw rj’id Varisrute Aonll• « Cr (or i"'i’c>**3r'Ly) .Vc!ross 3 3 I--*£3l Description ^ APPLia^fr i ---_________________^ 3 ^St L ^ 4;^ ■’*■'<-(ioT. 3/- // * . i j a-.VvHR - -/X )t.J:i£'2j':j^ < _ j5??f*.?_ f.J:^21 TJ! ^ Address V’ctI<'i-Of!s Vnriaico __ _ Piprap r/ *cC ___________ FOS CFFICMI, USE dW Cacicil Action Presc-nt Zorung . Present Use ^Ut-c4.rJ~ Zunisg Crdvp.^.r»ce Dretion Relating to Pe<(.iest 3_q^-2^o O Specify Ordinance Ibquirer.-nts V.J7 __/:i^ __^ -^-l/ / ^ D Date Approved Denied Explain Request Relative to Roofiiresents _ ■■/ J/ "30 /y ^. . /^. _ ^ ^ * l2-—'>-'yS'< -^. y xT c<-t_^y iT-^~ S<2y^J^ Extent of Nco-confoimty _3^ ci-t-vw ^.i/i^f A3S Har,khips to Property (Your roasois for roqo-sting this VarUnce or Conditional Use Perait ^ ~h'^ / i)^ e.-t' /\ n. . .. / ^ ^7 c/ /TU?v --> ^> >-o /.■.----- ±-2^Z__V<1-^ •y i ------------ — _________ ^ :2C;<y f ----y- ; J!7; y / / • •- •7> MAreRlAL KSC2SS.ARy K)R Oa PLETC APPLICATION U-^t be 5?ub.T5ittod 1 veelc prior to Co>jnci] Meeting) 1. Ajblicatian coj.pleted 2. Plat Mnp Section 3. Sjrv'ey (S;£tch in proposal) 4. Certified Property 0UT»er’s List of owners vithm (300 ft.) (150 ft.) - from r^e,*inepin Cojnty Registrsr of Deeds 5. <30.00 Pee * ' Date^ ------l \--------------------Sij,nsture « \ Vj .t^ i \ / '^A/ar/ih AWs e/ «52»t, /' wJ^ c/ /y^4_ c/ T yy^O *£-S"Z3 (S / I ■iJ- OCM -I •^<3 i i\ ! 4- Ll?r-. ? SI > ___________ — ri '«|L V) ^ «0 i >>M I Q> U);^ \ 5': V I*' \A ^ ACr<fl, 4-Z^SZS S;.y^/> ^ c > 'Nii\ Cl .?• JS 'V !//SO*St'll "£ , \------/OS^.4-/-------- '^Ssu/A //^e •/ i^i ^/ o/ C£^ O o X 000.0 ( 000.0 i Denotes Iron monument Denotes offset stako Denotes existing elev. Denotes Proposed clev. Denotes surface drainage Proposed garage floor elev. ^ ExStBtr l.EGAL DESCRIPTION The East 1/2 o£ the South 265 feet of the West 1/2 of the North east 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31-118-23. Subject to and including a twenty- foot easement for ingress and ogress being 10 feet on either side of a line described, as follows: Commencing at the North east corner of the West 1/2 of V the Northeast 1/4 of the South west 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31-118-23; thence West along the North.line thereof, a distance of 105 feet, to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence angle left, 74 degrees 30 minutes a distance of 100 feet; thence angle right, 18 degrees 00 minutes a distance of*162 feet; thence Southwesterly a distance of 180 feet more or less, to a point on the North line of the West 1/Z of the South 265 feet thereof, which point is 44 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof; thence Southeasterly a distance of 160 feet more or less, to a point on the East line of the West 1/2 of the South 265 feet thereof, which point is 100 fee • South of the Northeast corner thereof, and there terminating. Proposed lowest floor elev. ■ Proposed top of foundation etev. ■ BENCH MARK: I 1 i DEMAES - GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lana No. Plymouth MN (5441 Phona: (SI 2) 5S9-090S I hereby certify that thi» it a true and correct repreientation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and of the locatloo.of all buildings. if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any,jfio(A,or on sa'd land. As surveyed by me this ------ 19^1^ '' 11 \ ( ^ ' Minn. Reg. No File No. /34t> Book - Page Scale /%.•* '14901 n-}ip/r>A" MUU I * 1 izii ^0 < •f. ^ {^9jO) JL, Y f Fct^r^ ' / 00 Jc j >(s^zoi'- y' \ • • £Xf(/8iT-C Jg’ *, ' i . J Peterson X. ^ • ^ 6 so Ac. ^ m , 4/A/fS H/PtCAT/Va. ApPfenifiATf, L ocation usE»;;5lg:» VO f 0^ -r~‘- . - y-.--.-—^ V*. r— : » » ; I f -.V ^ K :. (\ ' \ *i • J* .:•* #•»sv .* K ■»4 1“ • 1 .. .> I"• ‘>'0. • - > V * ‘ 4, ^ *•. • Ik' , . ■ • • t % !Goodrich Lonry .‘:J ■ ■; .0 ■ ‘ V ' I ■•• ■ 41^0 IS.S5AC. 0A X * (hl&O) The Lathrcp Co tnc-'. i A56/J^./ r ' ■ " ' -1 •! •^S'c\0 (mso'ssizl - ___________I. % A I % ^ I J f if= ;• .73350)'.’* - ' /RMzz - I ’ 't' ■ .• ^ • T>*‘ ^n •O': ■ 4 ‘ — .» k 4 <a*o .0 »o >A :c tj . V ‘ A (W 1.J » h.-(G 1 ' ••' ^- • X l.••, /'3^00/ l‘1 C G Bryant »vy/ vy/ ^T7S7* . 4 Z4 Ac ,€ h Z of /VS //4 1 of S\\ 14 of SC t/4 • 04 %inn) t s r ______ cLii 7ft *. !|?r^ • • (4SOO) • to 00 Ac c: -• • • \'. r i-> p ;v. i / \:i48>: Fes f • i ?' - ' ’r* • v> ' ,f| V* * V ' ^ •"fi'lrs-''•.;• *"• * •» •i AVC--;Js.: '7: HCS54 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 150 #373 NAME ADDRESS DESCRIPTION LOT BLK.PARCEL 5ec 31 .T 1/2. /^.Z3 :./4 . J'-f <r-<,^- . --------- pL_RT* -415.^1 _____ _ __ •_ ^ ^ *:/? AJ E Of S^ 'U •=^Jl 6It. ‘>frcf £Vt (ch A. C ^ZL^fX ef iCV* cf/)£/4 aZ AJ/7.5 /=r c<c 544^7 rtXtO/e ef/C£ 3£ */4 -Of= 5IV */ 4 OA J€ y4- 'f G.J3^y^A;r J-lccrric^.iar i>_.M . Gol Jlipr^S £■ .JIe/£X3G^ rso^c? 9 A<t: w/3 ‘/tvirWy />7*J ^ Cr/,L' J-x. 11 X, t^// f^'Z/i W/} i / LI/A/1'/A/J. A/?r/0 /9. /I---/-/15 njn/*^ 4. f f. A 6c"'C ^ r/^ SC^.rni?i*^’3L‘ f»lk.L 5^ ^ __JZOO_ 3330*! 3-54<^ 3350_. ^ 300 _ — • 1 \ 1 ‘ 1 t 1 -i \ -------------------------^ 1 \ \ t J •Lractmj TO: Planning Commission 6c Council #37 4 FROM: H. F. htuhich. Zoning Administrator DATE: April 18, 1978 RE:John Perkins, 1265 Elim<7ood Variances Exhibit A - Application for variances to constiruct 3-car detached garage. Exhibit B - Survey indicating location of existing residence and proposed location of garage (10' from street and 3' from north side lot line). Exhibit C - Plat map locating subject property. This district is zoned LR-lB and the area is sewered. Current characteristics of property and proposed location of new garage: i 1. Lot area - 13,560 sq. ft. 2. Lot width - 63' 3. Street setback for proposed garage - 10' 4. Side lot line setback for proposed garage - 3' Variances necessary for approval: 1. Lot area - 30,000 sq. ft. 2. Lot width - 77' 3. Street setback - 25' 4. Side setback - 7' Applicant obtained staff approval for an addition to the existing residence about a year ago. This was shortly after the adoption of our current policy. Council waived variance procedures for additions which would not encroach existing setbacks. The location of the new garage as proposed has some drawbacks: 1. 19' separation between proposed garage and existing structure on Lot 1 to the north. I>DC^TICN OP PROr<EU (or pro;.;*rty) Address Legal Descriptioi^ APPLICANT ____ Najw Cmf OF Omn, MINNESOTA CcHiditicaal Ure and Variance AppUcdJajfM 4 3/ a\NER r^.nu<r^.. Kara Phone I Address Present Zoning Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to ReqLiest t Specify Ordinance Requirerents £msw~^__ Conditional Us© r"X Variance Ketlands Variance ____ Riprap J^^ce f}{ 6^- FOR OFFICIAL USE CNLY Council Action Date Approved Denied Explain Request Relative to Re<fLiirerants Extent of Non-ccnfonnity ■Hardships to Prt^ierty (Your reasais for rtsjussting this Variance or Conditional Use Pennlt ^ 'A^Ci ^ \UJ^ V /> ^ y/0 LA'TERIAL KECESS.ART RDR OOf tPLETE APPLICATION OList be submitted 1 ueek prior to Council Meeting) 1, Aralication corpleted 2, Plat Map Section 3, SuKuy (Sketch in proposal) 4. Certified Property 0uai3r*s List of o-ners vithin (300 ft.) (150 ft.) - from Hennepin County Registrar of Deeds 5, $30.00 Fee Date ____Signature \ t -V ‘ •'>: • ■ •.•'• '•• ' •"^■^.■’* •;^v V';>: -- V X Vv-; 'v ..V'f' *• ;« » «*••• »a.« DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 /SO r7 NAME PROPERTY OWNERS LIST #374 ADDRESS DESCRIPTION *A—* T _ tr-*— 1 ~i 1 111 11 ■^3/2c>) // A'AU tt___ •T, i. sc/MiCi-r ^ .JiS'A^.SoaJ _cr. £/S/JI'3c AJ Pj-Aj <./<Ali[i t Llioo aol sr%. T2 e Fair tPfGcu Sr A TG jiM'C^ c^eFi' /. i^oaO /Zi,s'- *• /Zj^-2 _ " ___________ ^ pip^- /ZfS'- - A'o^/ujsjrsi,/ - 4PkAr ^^Z'2.Ao) rPfcA/o P/f'C -^P2fit/ecC Fi'£. John C.^u Basch 17^ - Az.n C>e. MtuA'A *jLor s3>f 4 FBf^KfHlLL. LOT BLK.PARCEL / 2 3 / / / 3 lc?rs !<, 76~ n f/S' iz /3 |'n«f.v Hit rt*:ri5>J rrfSoSThtm lors fs>^ 2.7 Ihh r r V.v d Imd trjc i‘o o:.2*‘ Von as It;: Z2::> t rtcc^ds I 3 r.i Div, to *' : I' —. o and Horn. O. a'^.. e dn accUMSi ' on rf informs* *:, d:!:* cn Iho . Co. f 1/ I *) fc.'?. a1. cV'T 7 4 4 <57as;- d75c:J < oSoo_ /zso 0(ct^C^ £>710 Zi4c<P> 2COo 2<f^*o 747S" TO; Planning Commission & Council FROM; H. F. Muhich, Zoning Administrator DATE; April 18, 1978 RE; #375 Tim Gagner, 740 Tonkawa Rd. Variance - Street setback Exhibit A - Application for variance from street setback require ment for appx'oval to construct detached, garage. Exhibit B - Survey indicating proposed location of new detached garage, (NOTE; Survey was made in 1968. It appears survey was made prior to extensive addition to old residence.) Current characteristics of property and proposed loc«fi‘lon of new garage; 1. Lot area - 16,340 sq. ft. 2. Lot width - 76' 3. 10' from side lot line 4. 11' from street right-of-way The subject property is located in the LR-lB zoning district. (Lot requirements - 1 acre or 43,560 sq. ft. and width - 140') Exhibit C - Plat map indicating location of subject property. Variances necessary for approval; 1. Lot area - 27,220 sq. ft. 2. Lot width - 64' 3. Street setback - 24' cm OF Onax), ^^I>^^^=5OTA Conditional snd Vnriaj>te Appllc^tJ)n ryr.VnCN op P;?orO?AL (or pro;orty) Address /:?^Cl_jr2Sz2^4 ^c/ ^ V^J ^#: / O Al'^PLICANT tc-£al I^^scripticn Jk-C/fti __________ _______________ 'J yj- f'cJS ^2^±c^Jy/L Ai_ Addi-ess 7./^o_,-Tc>iAn>.//i aC>TiR K?4ne Address Phone # Present Zoning , _________ Present Use jf/':£j^ Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Rc-qoest ^ _ Conditional Use ___ Variance __Ket1ands Va riance Riprap L .^CC FOR OFFICIAL USE CM,Y Council Action Date Approved _ _____ Diniod -----------a 1 Specify ordijiance ibquire.-.^nu j,,^,:., ;^Ay,-u>4i?.y!^/ g. -■6a. />„<,.. -f-t-_______ Explain fequast telativB to Ro^iraants r'rr- ,-,it<=’ /;(», .^V./ a. -f '0 P r/ ^ ^ I!±=idS—.^tC^ Os- ,2.x 7{r;r' i-v^.vsa_ A.I - /V a., a______________ Extent of Non-conformity XV 71^^tA^rt <n, <9.a<r-^w»-a^,^x; -pr— Hardships to Property (Your reasons for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit rJ.\ . n 7 , >Y—----^ -----ULi.,iLA.^yy--'^ J'>'r<> f .rUL ^_y/~ ht\rJe:L.p r,A.^ :^oco M • rAl- -- 'A - J?? / */ KVTERIAL KECESS^JQf FOR 00?*I?LETE APPJ.ICVJ lON Oiist bC-^^b.Tiitted 1 woelc prior to Council Meeting) 1. 2. 3. A;blicatian co;.plctcd Plat Mip Secticai Suwey (Sketch in proposal) Certified Property 0u7isr*s List of ovnors vithin (300 ft.) (150 ft.) • from Hennepin Ccxinty Registrar of Deeds'''--.^^ S. $50.00 Fee Date V-/-7Y Signature ~^/Cy. \ X-. Wli-LIAM D. c,CHOtl.L ^ ! Oi» TC-» o C VIL M *. •• ••O »c *?• >• >• ».o. « f • * • riOM'DA ••o. •>0 * « A. • t> wc NT. NO. 1 1 • • SCHOBLL fc MADSON, INC. f . •; G: f • •: ~ r< 5 h r> w f t. y c P. 3 5^00 i/9 3 CA.F?Ll?iLe MAD30N LA Sfvr^^N t TC • ^0 S»STM A^CAtL’C fOV.TN •-OrKlf^S m; SSI acta PHOSt P3»7ei4 PTC?** LANr'.ry.TN fr O . MC n T. no . I7«t B CURTIIMCAT!; 01= SURVGY ^x\UdlT~-Q FOR-^ 7'<9/V Kulo Dehofes iron mcni/mant I H.*:RE3Y CC.RTIrY THAT THIS !S A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESE.NTATlON OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF: The southeasterly one-half of Lot 10 and the northwesterly one-half of the northwesterly one-half of Lot 11, Parten's Point First Division. AND Or THE LOCATION OF ALL &UILDINOS. IF ANY. THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF y^.uac/C^/~________ _ANY. FROM OR ON EAlO LAND. AS SURVEYED BY ME THIS-------------_<_/C/7C7't'-----DAY OF. PI3IBTCHIO land BUAVCTOII HAPCO i Mr-tt V .G \ Pr: \ ' / Va -X <•. \ \ f ^y / y/ /. >L'\ }>C» V - «» • yj — n.,.. MC»M DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, KN 55487 _ _ _ _ _ _ PROPERTY OWNERS LIST OtCjQO. NAf'lE ADDRESS DESCRIPTION LOT BLK. PARCEL r*' tA C ^ _ JV b c^CvVi Vs^x^sic; t. r£eA;£ e.A £> Vc) V O' ^ :P\a.t. 'A a^^SO > I . . ^ «ii^ \ ^ i K baoa vovVJiVk^ p^' 'w ' •b \\ V \ \. 1 A Ci . 3^>i|Ae\V\. OA_ AD V.- V A — - 1 1 ^ & ^1 ■ ^ 1 X ■ « 4 C ^n?30ToAVC-e.^ '^. HL/i SS-3^Aa- (-O' LjAO' G^%Q A \Qfe^ ns-v ago A\aa^ % ao n ] > .* *- n W^te, ^v\_oA VoV. JA V'J f -<^' ao'?t ^ 1 W I /ko<^vVoAei , (b>e,vo O«:\£A^^mU^^ <J^\D D ^ rH ■'*=*• tAfvl»r«[ «.4'^ 41^ .'rJto:’-'lt czi n»-^’ . TO:Planning Commission & Council FROM:Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator DATE:April 14, 1978 SUBJECT: Hennepin County Vo-Tech - 2950 - 6th Avenue North Conditional Use Permit Renewal Application Attached is application for renewal of Conditional Use Permit approved by Council resolution on May 9, 1977. The Conditional Use Permit was granted for one year subject to several conditions listed in the resolution. With the current application (#376) I am also attaching copies of the Council minutes dated April 27, 1977, and the Planning Commission minutes dated April 18, 1977. Also enclosed is a copy of the resolution of approval. • i Independent District 287 SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY AREA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL CENTERS March 51 #370 Mr. Henry Muhich, Zoning Administrator City of Orono Box 66, Orono City Hall 1335 Brown Road South Crystal Bay, MN 5S323 Re: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RENKWAL Dear Mr. Muhich: Joint Independent School District 287 requests that the City of Orono renew the Conditional Use Permit issued to JISD 287 on May 9, 1977, for purposes of conducting our specialty crop program farming operations on land zoned RRIB. The subject land consists of approximately three acres located at the Orono Public Scliool complex and approximately 22 acres owned by JISD 287 located at the northeast quadrant of County Road 6 and 201 (City of Orono). We appreciate your giving our request consideration and look forward to meeting with you and providing any additional information desired. Sincerely, James A. Rossbach Off Campus Administrator JAR/rn Enclosures NORTH CAMPUS 9000 North 77th Avenue Brooklyn Park, Minn. 55445 612/425-3^00 O DISTRICT OFFICE 1620 North Xer.iurn Lane Minneapolis. Minnesota 55441 612/559-3535 SOUTH CAWPUS 9200 Flying Cto jd Drive Eden Prame, Minn. 55343 612/944-2222 4 cmr OF caaio, md^gsota f f ly Canditional Ufs and Variarice ^ y LOC\riCN OP Pi?orOcx\L ^or props rty) ^ ■ Address__see attachmkn t a «yyo . ^Zb /4t/^ >1/ I^egal Description see attachment APPLICAVT JOINT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 287 Kara suburban henn. county vo-tech | 559-3535 Address North Xenlura Lane, Minneapolis, MN 55441 ac.'ER Kara see attachment .Phone I Address Present Zoning rrib School, • Present Use Resident Farm Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Retfoest 34.821 (34.032) t *- Specify Oi ’inance Requirerents Conditional Use Permit TYPE OF KHQLfHST ^ Condi tion.al Use __ Variance _ V.ctlands Variance Riprap /?/'f-?- FOR OFFICLU USE CNLY Council Action 4 Date Approved Denied 4 required for schools and farms In a RR-IB district Explain Request Relative to Ret^ircanents see cover letter Extent of Non-conformity Hardships to Property (Your reascns for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit se*: cover letter MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR OOf*I?LEIE APPLICATION (fiist be submitted 1 veek prior to Council Meeting) 1, Arolicaticm corpleted 2, Plat Mip Section 3, SuK’ey (Sketch in proposal) 4. Certified Property Ou-ner*s List of o.,ners v-ithin (300 ft.) (150 ft.) • from Hennepin County Registrar of D-eeds 5. $50.00 Te<s i Locations 1. Address; a)Orono Public Schools Orono, MN b) Legal description 2. Address: a) Northeast Quadrant of County Rd. 6 S 201 (City of Orono) I Owners 1. Name: Name: i b) Legal description: District Section Towtiship Range Plat Parcel 38 028 118 23 41328 2000 Orono Public Schools Orono, MN Phone: 473-7313 Joint Independent School District 287 SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY AREA VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOLS 1820 North Xenium Lane Minneapolis, MN 55441 Phone: 559-3535 i 1 >4 A i JiWE AODRtSS vs- _rsrar--''•»*» . .y ' *- PROPtkTY 0«:iERS LlSj nrs3iKrs.-.t.r=:. oection^as _cy\ otLQos'i yi'-i --------- ............. A.EOtUn. ■AaO ” ^?>^c " •_ J^jge SsW\X>A.^n- E^o“■ fcra-.-«u.avj--«“.;^---^- - - nS.pn.b-'OO. &i :Aaragr.(Lb:or^.Q|— rp\at 4Vi9-^)._. _U6(\iS^\\o SaKoo\T5\Gb^f9 JO^: fa^ jV\b\O.Ahi<2.S-- . '^AOeAJhSoWoi I'sua Arv ^o. \iv^*y ., __kK20C J‘joi-a J.Hp.:<(: SQi-Q ' ,'TJ S<-,i Hq^c5> \aQC>^ ^ Vc*n£^V3^’C'^ if------------- ^iVs aAi'v< L-V-0-Q%>CiK^ '^'io ______rr- “T " £.<?>J :p __________________:WtO.K^-a' -4• T7 i jr\ V f - r-’^k 'v ^y A G>nv A''^y '.Qv V./V^ I A-ZiH'.-*' <r.:-3C:»-?-• •: c3. H_ pOr-Tr.Vjs.V V ^ V- (. feQ50 KQS.Qloo/O 7_Q_^ lOQQ lia?CL \ l\ScO 1 :A Oc-t\c5t.1^ A '•"J' ‘^’bOC ■^JnoO ----------*r tf Ir ■*n C»» F n /••• L- /von \ ------4^h fh: W^Tf^ r RKSOLUTION #781 A RECOLUTION GRANTING TO THE JOINT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 287 A CONDITIONAL USE PE^IT FOR AN AGRICULTURAL USE IN AN RR-l-B DISTRlCi AND CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE I WHEREAS, the Joint Independent School District 287 (hore- ^oirrlhl fro” JreUo«^Uni?od‘a«oS\o adjacent agricultural fields for farming uses only, and WHEREAS, the proposed use requires a conditional use permit pursuant to the Orono Zoning Code, and WHEREAS, the applicant has ^J,^Jhich"willthe limitations of the Specialty ^rop Production Program v^hrch^ be undertaken on the property xn the City ot orono an on the use of the bridge. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1 That the City of Orono grants a conditional use permit for one yeh t^rte^a^pUcL? based <rl the following conditions. such areas as orchards, ''®5et^t>les, Y ^^d the construct-s*;i ra;‘s.s: tr"V£r™ and may not be used for general pedestrian B On a temporary basis, satellite Se ^ylSi^siuSn^s^hrif ortL^rioJu^ios: mrb;3s?2ued on the properties pursuant to municipal and State regulations. r There shall be no student parking on the properties • aoDlicant will provide transportation from the classroo laboratory bSilding which is located off the properties. D. The access to County Road #6 shall be u.>cd for agricultural purposes only E. The location of the proposed trailer shall be approved by the building inspector prior to installation. Resolution 1781 Page 2 2. This conditional use permit in no way _ applicant any right to construct any buildings now or in the f on the properties. 3. The City Council is granting this conditional use permit based upon the representations g^P^opertics in theplans to construct or locate any buildings on the PfoP^^Jics in future expect as above set forth, that the fridge is y potations by the applicant that it is very important that f ^ ^s conditional use permit at this time because of scheduling conflicts the applicant has with its studontc. 4. Any conditional -• .»it granted hereby issis'svas Code and further Council action. 5. The applicant and the property they havo no vestod rlyhts to continue ‘his operation beyond one^yo^ without first applying for and acquiring from the City of the necessary permits for such a continuation, 6. This conditional use shall apply to ® acres which the applicant Is ?hf appll«itSchools and shall apply to approximately 22 acres tnatt pp has purchased from Mrs. Emma Gardner in the City of orono. This resolution was adopted by a. vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays a^‘he^ reaularlv scheduled Council meeting of May 9, 19>7^ ^nd J to^the signing hereof by the applicant and the property owne . William B. Van Nest, Mayor Attest iii ^ssasmmsmmm CONTINUED MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL APRIL 27, 1977 Page 5 elevation of Gray’s Bay Dam is 929.4 ft. Also, rioraopinq and dredging is subject to the PlLning Commission reconunendations; also, channel shall be blocked during dredging to prevent siltation to the lake. Then the next stop shall be to dig the channel. Another stipulation is that the^applicants may have access over Lydiard Avenue to the lagoon during this project, as long as they agree to pay for any damages to the road and that they do not disturb any marshes. SEAWALL & RIPRAP Walter’s Port (Continued) Qtated that all property owners are not with Plan C. Upon those findings of fact from applicants: Holsh moved, Butlor seconded, to withdraw tho above motion. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Welsh moved, Butler seconded, to table the Council meeting when at that time, the applicants will sho^the City Council that all are in agree- ^eii wuJ: e'^lan L present a f ^ to this proposal. Motion^ Ayes (3) y Vo-Tech; '^NDITIONAL USE PERMIT Vo-Tech #247 .f I Hr. John Lobben was present. Thesince the work session at the last meeting! M^e Lobben has submitted some plans for a be constructed by the students. No ^ been made by Vo-Tech concerning the farming operation in Medina. The Planning Commission was still providing access to the "^p.^rLe 'Mr. Lobben assured them that tnis is .» l matter from the Vo-Tech Campus proposal. After some discussion, the Commission rcco...nendod app?Sval of the conditional use permit for one year based on the following conditions: (Continued) Ji CONTINUED MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL APRIL 27, 1977 Page 6 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. That the only activities that shall be under taken on the properties shall be the special crop production which included such areas as orchards, vegetables, nursery stock, sod, Christinas trees, small grains and annual and perennial flowers. On a temporary basis, satellite sanitary facilities and a minimal shelter such as a small mobile construction trailer for use by the students while on the properties, may be installed on the properties pursuant to municipal and State regulations. There shall be no student parking on the properties since the applicant will provide transportation from the classroom laboratory building which is located off the properties. Access would be permitted from County Road S6 at location "A", which was approved by Hennepin County because of an existing culvert. The location of the proposed trailer shall be approved by the building inspector prior to installation. This conditional use permit in no way grants to the applicant any right to construct any buildings now or in the future on the properties. Receipt of written statement assuring the City that the bridge would be removed if renewal of the conditional use permit be denied at any future date. Bridge not to exceed 8' i;: width. This in no way denotes that we are approving the use of the bridge as access to any future buildings in Medina. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Vo-Tech Crop Program (Continued) This recommendation of approval was by a 3-2 vote. Council Meeting - April 27, 1977 Mr, John Lobben, representing Hennepin County Vo- Tech Schools, stated that the reason for building the bridge was: 1. 2. 3. 4. To have access to land to the north to use equipment that is stored in a barn in Medina, To farm the land in Medina, as well as the land to the south in Orono. That there will be no student traffic to Medina. That there will be no student parking on the land, on the north or the south, and the reason for this request is to have access from County Road #6 for agricultural purposes only. ^5ayor Van Nest moved, Welsh seconded, to concept ually approve the conditional use permit for a crop program, for agricultural purposes only, and the proposed bridge, based upon the previous stipulations:(Continued) Il ! i CONTINUED MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL APRIL 27, 1977 Page 7 1. 2. 3. 4. To have access to land to the north to use equipment that is stored in a barn in Medina. To farm the land in Medina, as well as the land to the south in Orono. That there will be no student parking on the land, on the north or the south. The reason for the request is to have access from County Road #6 for agricultural purposes only. and also per the Planning Commission recommendations of April 18, 1977 and instructed staff^ to submit a resolution for Council review May 9/ 1977. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Mrs. Marge Gasch, 1030 Tonkawa Road, stated to the Council that she is requesting reimbursement from the City in the amount of $1,261.80 for what I feel to be reasonable for the loss of my privacy for my family since the new house at 1020 Tonkawa Road was not built according to the Orono City Building Code. The City of Orono was at fault for the house being built without the proper setback from the lakeshore. I am requesting these costs be paid by the City of Orono or I will take the legal steps necessary to bring to the court's attention the illegal way the building permit was issued to 1020 Tonkawa Road and the setback violation. This has caused a loss of reasonable privacy and peace of mind for my family. The outline statement of costs are; The variance application fee Property owners list Survey Fence lumber Shrubbery Attorney fees Total $30.00 5.00 172.00 61.52 923.28 70.00 $1,261.80 Mayor Van Nest informed Mrs Gasch that he felt that the City of Orono had e.,ted in good faith in granting a building permit to Mrs. Parten, 1020 Tonkawa Road, to construct a new home. The Mayor also noted that there was no survey submitted by Mrs. Gasch to support her argument that the site line was such that part of this property should be further to the rear. Mayor Van Nest continued by informing Mrs. Gasch that the Council felt that the setback as located was proper. That the City certainly had no ability to expend p»>blic monies simply because Mrs. Gasch felt that her property suffered a diminution of value or that she felt that she had lost some of her privacy. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Vo-Toch Crop Program (Continued) MRS. MARGE GASCH MATTER . (Continued) ■f . I i [1 ’ I. MLNUTES OF A rLWNlNG CatUSSlON IDibTING IU:LD APRIL 18, 1977 - PAGE 7 A lengthy discussion followed on the issue of riprap vs. aluminum seawall. Mr. Hai-lmaim explained that the members of the association have been meeting on a regular basis for several months to discuss this problem. During these discussions, they established a set of common objectives - marsh disturbance, shoreline changes and total costs. He also stated that they did not want to establish a new pre cedent for wJiatever they do in the lagoon. Uicy found an agreenent as to what frontage in this lagoon is co,.nonly beneficial to all homeowners (channel is coinnonly bene ficial and the 340’ west wall which is abutting the narsh). They then came up with a formula to divide the lagoon frontage between each individual oivner. Their preferred solution to this problem is a combination of riprap and seawall; three menbers prefer riprap (Ellis, DeGregory, Crist), while four members prefer the seawall Olartmann, Blunt, Nelson, Reese). Mr. Hartmann stated that from an engineering standpoint ice would have a more damaging affect on riprap than it would on the seawall. Riprap would also require rerroval of the high bank. The cost of the riprap is much higher than the se^all. Another msnber of the association expressed his concern for the removal of a large nurber of trees that would be necessary if they were to riprap the entire area. The Planning Cemmission was not in favor of the iietal seawall and preferred riprap or a wooden replacement. Hweyer, this situation being unique because of the straight sides and depth of the seawall and future dredging would not be needed as soon as without rip rap we allow, the Commission felt the seawall was a solution to this situation. The Planning Commission was also concerned about the seawall from a public safety aspect. Mr. Hartmann stated that the Association would be willing to provide the necessary safety measures. After some discussion, Pesek moved, Hosfield seconded, to reconmend approval of a combination of riprap and aluminum seawall for protection of the lagoon and channel subject to the following conditions; (1) The City's receipt of revised, detailed plans (2) (3) indicating exact location of riprap and seawall as j L . ........................................................................... -preferred by individual menbers of the Association. A written statement of approval from all property owners and underlying fee owner of lagoon and channel. Provide safety measures along steep seawall such as life line, roj^e ladders, etc, Fngineer's review and approval. Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (0). The Zoning Ailninistrator infonwd tlie Co.-mission tliat since the work session at the last rceting, Mr. Lcbbcn has sub mitted some plans for a bridge going over the existing creek WALTERS PORT IJVOOON (continued) (#245) Hl^.’NiiPIN OXJNTf \'0-TECH 2940 SIXTH A\TLNJE N. CONDITiaMAL USE PERMIT for access for the farm enuipnent from the Medina area. Proposed FOR ciop PROGRAM -'l^TiKAL >ed 24' long and 8' wide, to be constructed (#247)bridge would be a flat bi by tJie students. I I J*5INjlr.S CF A PLVCvING OTM15.S10N M-IKTING HnLD ^''RIL 18, 1977 - PAGE 8 Tlie Plsnnirig Cc:r.r:i5 s5 on w.?s concerned ai.out providing access to the .’’edina area. Mr. Lobhen v.as present. He .again assured the Co iT.ission t!;.at this was a separate ratter froin the Vo- Toch c.-i-ip-.y; proposal. To date no decision h.as been I'.ade by Vo-Tech concerning the farming o-cration in I'c-dina. After sone disojssion, Pesek roved, D^alap seconded, to reconjr.end .approval of the conditional u<e permit for one year based on tl»e folleaving conditions: (5) (6) TTiat the only activities that shall be indej-taVen on the properties shall be the sp-ecial crop production which includes such areas .as orcharvls, vegetccbles, nursery slock, sod, Qiristj-as trees, small grains and ajrvual and perennial flo.>ers. On a temporary basis, satellite sanitaiy facilities and a minijnal shelter su«ch as a small nobile construction trailer for use by the students while an the pi-operties, ray be installed on the properties pursuant to luiicipal and State regulations. Tliere shall be no student p.arking on the properties since the applicant will provide transjortanon from the classroom laboratoiy building which is located off the properties. Access would be j>ennittc-d from County Read 6 at location "A" which was approved by Hennepin County because of an existing ailvert. The location of the propcsc-d trailer shall be approved by the buUding inspector prior to installation*. 'fhis conditional use permit in no way grants to the applicant any right to corstmet any buildings now' or in the future on the properties. Receipt of wTitten statement assuring the City that the bridge would be rerioved if renewal of the onditiona.l use permit be denied at an>' future date. Bridge not to exceed 8' in width. This is no way ¬es that we • are appro\*ing the use of the bridge as access to any future buildings in Medina. 1-btion: Ayes - 3 (Pesek, Dunlap, Hosfield) - .Kays - 2 (^VcDonald, Hassel) Mr. Wittig was present and the Planning Carrnission reviewed the proposed site pl.an with him. The new building would consist of an office area above with a showTOcm below. Most of the boats would be stored inside alang with sore storage facing County Read ^51. The rcixirctn height of this building would be 26 ’ which would reet the rc-quireonts. The applicant also presented a landscaping plan indic.ating rest of the pro posed pi .anting to be aroujid the building itself. Proposed planting would begin after building was coplcted which would be during the year 1977. 'Jbe Co.vission advised that the surface of the building rc-quires a second m^teri.nl to cm- plemcnt Uie metal p.'inels. HEsbr.PIN COirvn- VO-lEOi (Continued) (#247) G.4YLE'S MARIKA 5366 NORTH SIORE DRT.E PH 11 DING PFAK APPROv.^L 6 1977 UCFASE (#248) I i I I : I TO:• Planning Commission & Council FROM: H. F. Muhich, Zoning Administrator DATE: RE: April 18, 1978 John Swanson, 2795 Casco Point Rd. Conditional Use Permit - Two additional living quarters as guest houses Exhibit A - Application for approval of Conditional Use Permit to add two more residential units to existing residence to be used as guest houses for the families of both man and wife of subject household. The walkout basement would be expanded and remodeled as a separate residential unit for one of the families and the second unit would be added above the existing garage. Exhibit B - Survey of subject property indicating lot dimen sions, location of existing structures and proposed necessary additions to provide for two additional residential units. The preoerty is located in an LR-IC zoning district. (1/2 acre or 21,7*60 sq. ft. area and 100 ft. lot width required.) The subject lot meets lot area requirement and 80% of lot width requirement. Property is sewered and assessed for one unit. The existing garage is located 5.9 feet from south lot line. Although the proposed second story is only an extension of this existing wall, I believe we should address the sub standard setback as a variance requirement as the proposed expansion would be for the purpose of providing an additional residential unit. (A change in building use) If the unit above the garage were to be approved, frost footings would be required around the perimeter of the existing garage to prevent frost damage to the structure and water and sewer lines. Exhibit C - Section of plat map indicating location of subject property. Applicant has submitted one set of plans for projected renova tion if proposal is approved. tI W h* ' #377 continued -2 Approval of this proposal would require the following: 1. Conditional Use Permit approval for two additional units to be used as guest houses. 2. Variance of 4.1 feet from the required 10 foot side yard setback requirements for living quarters above garage. 3. Sewer unit charges should be addressed. •F.1 ' ! !■ t 1 k-.,- /j cm OF ORaW, ^^I^O£^OTA ^-10 ConditiorvRl ard Variarce Application. OP PSOi'Ofx^L for pro^srty) Atldrass Vt y {O/I/z, ^ r-r? — 4 I - >^g^i^onal U sr V:gn Inscription ^ ____Viitlands Variance APPLICW I’ajro ~7c///0 /9 IV/) A)^ OAJ j^pne I Address co py 5 a.?^ER Naire Address ___Phone #____ Zoning IJlzJC Sth'cQf Present Use ^ Riprap FOR OFFICIAL USE O^LY Coiincil Action Date Approved Denied Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request Specify Ordinance Requircirents C/^^p PSA ^^/T RS<!lVl/i$0.—fyA—SUSST //oust A4r/I/ff>ice_______ Explain Pa<p.est Ralativa to feo^tirtcont, TUJp 4 lH'ft/s nvAKTf.in »f: /^amiUisk qa n^7A^ M.R 1 ((ri^fsT //ae/ss ^^Ac/Zy/‘//j:‘c^ Extent of Non-conformity Tlop Z/Oju/iuj /9pr^ -HardsMpa to Ptt^rty (Your toaa<a« for «qoastlo* this Variance or C»ditiona Us, Pen^t ■TMee »c,,e - /a ^ c-y iLH.^ /tr - 7-^f ^4,r- /ar 7-^ ■^_ S/>iSyV4S> s-um/mry-i tv-ru us - APt-/ ■> fpA 1 FATCRIAL KECESRARy K)R C0f-I?LBIE APPLICATION P-.:st be submitted 1 veek prior to Council Meeting) 1. Ajalication completed 2. Plat Map Section 3. Survey (SVetch in proposal) 4, Certified Property OuTisr's List of owners within (500 ft.) (150 ft.) - from Hennepin Cosnty Registrar of Deeds 5. $50.00 r-c-s Date Siyiature enmatT- B ^sv «• i*i:it of .'^ur-vny for Jo'ip A. fVMnr^on in Lotr L'V ^rKi i> , .'Jorlnf i’tirJc V Honrinpjn County, l.lnnosnta Cort^flofito c»<‘ •** I c » rtn*y U*m t thir. \r m trn»' f*fui rorrort ro*^r«;:;or UiUor* of ^ rui-voy of V.\r lomriurlon of ijot l?*j nrni i.hht ; art of .^ot L3^> liouLhfrly of a lino drauii .'♦•(Umii with Uie Koriruirl/ ami Goutnorly iln^a of r.aiu iiot 130, to*;f:Utor wiUi tfuit piWt of i>iko:fnoro Av^^iiuo vara tod «no of th*» tract of l;nd b^'twoon r*Hld vacat'd iiv»»nue arid Uio cliOiO of KliinctoriKO , ar r1*'ojf.n»i tod ano dol'in^d iii U*^ Irir tr* ]n»*nt of iu*m Lc» ti^m on V»„j t oi* ri;>rini: f/irk, Lj'inf hotwr.oii Uio .y’:!l^rly •• :;lon of OMi»; rr’dl- :* Uiio t‘i»» >,*»:;tiM*i.y ion oJ* t.:u* hi’uuliorly of st-id .jOt all in liprino ap'i th** i.or*’ti^p '‘IL hull.*rt|r tf>or**an, mi'.: »Li. vlriisl** "i cro/irn, <-ro j’r»u or* on u^iu L'lrir. l**r '»»iroo ‘vn of th*:* ru?V'\.*, n. !*’ <'•*.•01.10 Lifi»> h. ;. hnoii auii*iiv.»u ta a liji<» uriwu J'jiu. t v* nudooiat oi tiH* ;v*:it**rl iiu* of r.aifl 'jOt 13^' i*io i.lduoint oi la** ft«*!;toriy Lln*J oJ* Imiiu 13*'* Too oxl;.tii4, lino al* occu-.ntion doou nv»t J*it naid tnodi»iii tin»r m ilofiT'Oc. . r, • , . /• Sc«l.<: I" - /.O' ^ Usit" : 'f|; • :: Iron tr**r--*r foiitid 1 Iron n^trk.jr cot u ru‘>ii A. iu;;ii; w#'M'd hrirveyor ant fl /ii.or .iOn*. 4#'iKc, Minnar.ot.;! # ^ . •.. .. • •• . I -• X -«.» • * ..•^ • V- is*? • A-• •'-• V •.* *.•' •-• • •. t.. . r r.\ ■*, *;.•:• vV ,;_.j ?7 X \ / I L ■* /c ^ y-'» %' 'My *« . ^ .•^ • • 1 % - ' :fe / ■/; c v^; fS • :£>^- • Q^-J Zi •/ . • • -i .r . M "•W ^ • .; *.i 1^'. ' ':, r } ■;- ;• ■ • *. J- * - ***I - •• ••.« *• ■ •■ •**• ••• V,* ' /. •> •- > 4 •: M r' ■ jr ^i . . •"r\r A.; A i- •• % • k • ^ V'i •' ’ ^ ^ ^..* •. • ^ ••- , i ••; :* •:•; *. i ••‘7. -*•-•■•. ■■." ■ ' ' .•■■-. •*' • ; • . • *r . i * ■. *'• - • _ . - * :;•«.« • ••- ' . f -r r .•*-< • . :/ *••. .;• ' ^ ... •#»,. » - • .4* , ' ’■ • \ : * X • --- r* -•• t.’- ?: ■ v» •I*?. ^ Lk » 4*. k •***•5 ■ ,V ^ ?. * .* ? ' r^* v^2* • •• ' ■• •'Xf'-'• k X*4. <’ " 'A • ■ .-r. {*•'.-. si'. 9 “i * •- I t . 4. •>•^7 k > >7 ^ : 4kT:. * • • •• • *, *, * • . .^ k -^1 4 .■> . . :.\ •. • .-,• *f-', ., ••• • - •■«*.- . ■ :•: .. ;-.7 ; • ‘ .=• ' J*. . r.r:^ ' • *v . - • • V *•• i.^. *1 HCS54 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAI4E ADDRESS o DESCRIPTION /Voc\\'e.^(Lj\ool\ex:'Li', K .Ov ;^-\4o\c>c,\ l\ .V<s. w s c\ no: OiNcyVet) ,N .^bc : '0 .lOl. J£W^^e ^ O V:C /' < / [ .V ,' i'- C ^ U__M , , Vlex-V-Q-^......... V-o\:-> I \ 3k((J ^• : 7 7 P‘ 7^ .1 r 'li—j.L'O', . ■• / '. '■ -\—. K..,.^c\oc\voAg. . A'\ Wvx-iQo\: A Vio . _SlC:2^ lA.ui'Ac:^ — —. . sr- . • r • ’ 1‘__t • \ ‘• '1.. .CaSsC.o \\e\C;' ^P\ei'c. A 0.0^“^ L-..u t ~^A0 ^3d Ae:^o A\c^r\ 5^.n^s\e ob LoVjji n- ilV‘- L3't.aoY^t\vj^J?fc<|fa\ — - J ^r -- ;a.‘- LOT BLK. — 1 _\a'7 _______ , ' s \9-'?/ V so_,.( 0?/ -1 N 'A f »\‘A ?: A i; PARCEL 400 dOC mo iO I o r #378 HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 296 MAPLE PLAIN. MINNESOTA 55359 TELEPHONE 473-4693 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS JUOTH S. ANDERSON CHAiRMAM BLOOMINGTON CHARLES R P»«. VICE CHAIRMAN ORONO WH.UAM BAR8EAU GOLDEN VALLEY AMELIA M OeMUSE MINNEAPOLIS OAVKJ OURENBERGER MINNEAPOLIS ALANK GREENE MOUND LAWRENCE F HAEO robbinsdale JUNE HEGSTROM MINNEAPOLIS L6AHOLLENOER MINNEAPOLIS RAYMOND N SEAGREN MINNEAPOLIS CUFTONE. FRENCH SUPERINTENDENT Hr. A1 Olson, Planner City of Orono 1335 South Brown Road Long Lake, Minnesota -5356 VT » ' ’ i . RE: Bike/HIke Trail At Baker Park Reserve Dear Hr. Olson: As you know, the Hennepin County Park Reserve District Is proposing to construct a bike/hike trail around that portion of Baker Park Reserve which lies south of County Road 2k. The total length of the proposed trail, including the main loop and spur connection Is 7.1 miles. Of this total length, approximately 1.2 miles lies within the City of Orono. This distance Includes approximately 0.2k miles along Starkey Road for the spur connection to County Road 6. THOMAS B HUMPHREY, JR MAPLE PLAIN In order to complete the loop trail. It will be necessary to construct a fill adjacent to the Lake Katrina marsh at the point where the marsh is closest to the Right-of-Way of Highway #12. This fill will carry the bIke/hIke trail and the horse trail. Top of the fill will be wide and side slopes will be at 3:1. The fill will be located as close to the Right-of-Way line of Highway #12 as possible. The new fill will also make use of the existing horse trail fill which was partially completed several years ago. Surface of the trail through the fill area will be crushed limestone. I estimate that total quantity of fill required to be StOOO to 6,000 cubic yards. This material will be taken from a stockpile and borrow area located just to the west of the proposed fill. This fill is necessary so that this trail can be constructed as a loop around the park. It is desirable so that the experience of the trail user can be continuous. Our recent experience with the horse trail, which was never completed through this area, shows that there is a reduction in user satisfaction with a "dead end" situation. I r ! "J-m.r,’ Page Two Mr. A1 Olson, Planner Permits for this work have been applied for from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. To date we have received approval from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as shown on the attached letter. We feel that this proposed fill will be in the best interest of the public and will not be detrimental in any way to the objectives of the City of Orono. We hereby request a variance to the City Ordinance No. 125 so that this project can be completed. Attached, please find supportive maps and sketches. Sincerely yours, Timothy I. Marr District Engineer TIM/ra Enclosures cc: File 11.1 ^378 m hassan csSiv** ••HASSAN ■PAWK-'VO r fj|7>? 1/1 map op HENNEPIN COUNTY Sl»l«a|« MiIm ----^ . ..*f 'L *S 7\ t ccr«<o »»Af| tviaMri !■ — (Oi<^*p »— I■ .M »•••€ A.* •mutt 0 tA«*tv ••MttS 0 co»co*im cwerid ’irio , .# I i. ##• ••••V i ^LAKE t-lREBHCCA/ HDparic V j RESER^ I xdy V Ol C-' NCtffNCKNC MfOtlWA ■f «*V -• PLfkAC rRROPOSED >FIL & PARH-: ■-■l::"' , ' ✓\>Ta X ® AA00<CIVI% fAJJIJ COON RAPIDS AM ^ REGIONAL “ARK « $ # \f»;i _ &r»: gPl .•.* l-AC^i v>.rf • •:* 1* i i -A ^ s- LJ. 4 . • m CARVER PARK RESERVE /•>.' r —- /: rf % ^ PRAi{if£' 4 !•= 1'?#^ £r_ ! <i>- c « ■sa^V ri/iH-O C >4 \& •* # r =c>=-^ lANiO 'V\3 ^ JAMES W. WILKIE REGIONAL PARK ‘JfT... A • ^o'rok- Horn el Rrf*; ^ouf^tv 24 /* • • • • .• • ^*5. • a •• ■ • • I-.-.j • f* • » . *• • * . • . • • ••— • * • 1 ^ • ;<'. . . •. V .■ •: *^\ * ••* .- . •' -<•• • .*-T < *• • 1 ‘.f •• • • • ^ • • /. > •• •• V. I;;*-. •*. * .. • . .. --V ..» . ... ---------- ... . .. v.~.^ .VI * * • -v**V. ■..* • iL-» • *. , * •• •• • « • • • •»/ •; V. ^ j • • ^ • i. •• emorris t./baker •- park .reserve . r-■• ./?■ f hsnn^pif) “jcounfy ** ** ^*^*‘^'^**' -*5 (( Yy oa c 1 o DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT , ♦ The Hennepin County Park Reserve District Is preparing plans and specifications for the construction of approxinately 7.2 miles of . asphalt paved bike-hike trail within Baker Park Reserve in Western Hennepin County. This project is part of the nearly 30 miles of bike-hike trail which will be constructed in our various park reserves this sumiaer under one of Govenor Perpich's trail programs. This trail is a loop around the south half of Baker Park Reserve. Access to the trail will be from County Road «f6. County Road i*19 and County Road 1^24, and a trailhead area near the Baker Beach. At the south end, the trail will run along the perimeter of the Lake Xatrlna marsh for a distance of about 1,200 feet. . i We propose to construct a fill adjacent to this marsh tc support the combined bike-hike and horsetrails. The new fill will be located adjacent to the horsetrail fill which was partially completed in 1973 We do not propose to sub-excavate before placing the fill. We anti cipate that some settling may occur during the first years. The surface of the trail in this area will be crushed limestone, rather than asphalt. We estimate that approximately 6,000 cubic yards of fill will be required- This material will be taken from a stockpile and borrow area near the southwest corner of the park reserve. . « - * CATU*4 AOjACtHT c^h£R5: 0 PA 1/1/MJ IH pA4f/r AT lApy' '^^AT'PA/JA © X.t.\.x.^■t V SIAIE #f}n.lC»TICl 8/ ACT SwrgT CF CATC_______ _ _____ 12A ■II : I' i (t C 19^ Q ''V •^* • •.;; ^-o'r- FlUUgi^. «5fc5.d. KaVD 1929 iir^~VD P?A/M e>0 3l^)pe .^..<3?c0Kp &U 9^.0 hJelVP 1929 f lU. AtiLy^^eKr ID l<Arr<iM\ hh^P^ r:: ^Ater |<io'-o* D^klCH A/CVO i72?'^ AOJ^CCHl FPCi^ERir Q />>/ ..• r«vv © • • • •* 1 ccuHir cF///A'.*'r/vA/ siatc 1 •#p?i.ic^Tic*» ar co^^ry I j^ysr^^ 4>^x/W*S0 1 . S^tcf CF 0»T€ J 12A ■ r m ^ ^ 'i • ^ 4 I CITY OF OROKO PARK COW^ISSION / 1> Regular neeting of the Orono Park Coi'inission held April J+, 1978: The Orono Park Commission net on the above data with the following members present: Chairman Tomlinson, Berglund, Kelley, Egers, V.'atson, Peterson. Absent: Lathrop. Also Present: Jim Olson, City Engineer and John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator, The minutes of the March 7, 1978 meeting were approved. A letter from Orono City Administrator, Dick Benson, dated 3/22/78, has assured the Park Commission that various projects which have been promoted by the commission are, in fact, scheduled to begin or continue in the upcoming construction season. ATTEKDA21CE MINUTES APPROVED LETTER FROM DICK ^SON Park Projects Will Be On Schedule Chairman Tomlinson, as directed by the conntiission, ACCEPTANCE OF TREE PLANTINGS has contacted Mr. Larry Gleason, whose property by Mr. Larry Gleason, whose is surrounded by Hackberry Park, regarding the property is surro\uided by location of transplanted trees in that park, Mr, Hackberry Park Gleason was appreciative of our concern and was willing to accept tree planting in the park wherever it could best serve the recreational and esthetic needs of the park. A drawing of the park, with tree planting priorities noted, has been sent to the city Public Works Coordinator as a guide for Hackberry Park plantings. Initial grading of Bederwood Park will begin when ground conditions allow. Mr, Otto Christensen, •- •ail planner for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, presented his department's plans for a replace ment bridge at the crossing of the Luce Line Trail and Orono Orchard Road. The proposed structure would bo a clear span arched bridge, 10 FT. pathway of steel construction with wood rails and trim. Primary reasons for considering a new bridge were: 1 . Inability of current bridge to accoronot^te road and drainage im provements without dismantling. * 2. Increasing cost of new bridge in future years if installation is delayed. 3. Difficulty experienced by trail users who must cross at road grade elevation. A motion by Tomlinson, seconded by Kelley, to recommend to the city council that DNR plans for a new bridge be favorably considered was unanimously passed. BEDERWOOD PARK GRADING NEW BRIDGE AT LUCE LINE TRAIL AT ORONO ORCHARD RD. Mr. Otto Christensen, from DNR, recommended witn com mission members to council. -1- JIEGULAR ]-2STIliG OF THE PARK COI3-1ISSION HELD APRIL kp 1978 Ilr. Alex Keyer and Mr. Tim Karr, of the Hennepin County park Reserve District staff, presented the district's plans for a bicycle trail around a portion of Morris T, Baker Park, One item of concern to the City is the plan to connect one spur of the trail by permitting bicycle and pedestrian travel along 1250' Tapproximately) of. Starkey Road, a road within and maintained by Orono. A second concern is the proposed filling along Highway 12 of a portion of the swampy low grotind near the outlet of Lake Katrina (aka Rice Lake) to accommodate another portion of the bike trail. In view of the advantages of ex tending bicycle trails connected to existing and proposed trails in Orono, the following recommenda tion is made to the council: Motion by Berglund, seconded by Erger: "It is recommended to the Orono City Covincil that every effort bo made to support the Hennepin County Park Reserve District in its endeavor to construct bike trails in Morris Baker Park, including the connecting sptirs on non-park property, provided: Approval based on thorough study is received from the city engineer, and Some type of release from public liability for that portion of the trail along the public road be secured from the park reserve district. Motion unanimously passed. BICYCLE TRAIL AT BAKER PARII AI/)ljG STARKEY RD, IN ORONO Reco:nmendations to councils 1. Approval after study 2. Release from public libility on road 1 2. Mr. Bruce Dayton, and his attorney, Mr. Louis Oberhauser, appeared before the commission to discuss Mr. Dayton's proposed donation of a certain parcel of Long Lake lakeshore and approx imately 10 acres to Orono for a public beach and park. Two considerations are foremost in the donor's stipulations regarding the property, namely: 1 2. Its use as a public facility shall not bo limited to persons for any reason re lated to place of residence, race, or creed. A home now situated at the corner of Old Long Lake Road and East Long Lake Road which is being given to the Spring Hill Conference Center, be permitted a variance to Orono zoning ordinances (2-acre min,) so that a logical property division can be made, giving the city the maximian land possible for park purposes. The house property would retain approximately 80,000 square foot in area. Ilio second house on t'uis property, situated DAYTON PROPERTY DONATED TOR PUBLIC BEACH & PARK AT LONG LAKE LAKESHORE 1. Strictly public 2. Disposition of two homes on property 3. F*uture donation of property - Peterson 1978 ;YCLE trail AT )ljG STARKEY RD. IN O^ORO ‘ovninendations 1 , Approval after siu jri 2 Release from public * libility on road # • ilSSJCE lakeshorb 1 . Strictly pubUo 2 Disposition of two homes on property ■3 Future donation of ^operty - Peterson .-/TocTn-J HELD APRIL ll, ’978: ,, 0 OF THE PARK 00.M1SSI0.1 H..L R30ULAR near foe?|„rfor orchis proport,.has not llTposfi dofinilo plon| ewi^lngraor^rird'sanctuar,. pionl| srounda^^^ "tnl dfo^" Vorgopof,* -nl?er. K^^undertakon Berglund, to tLa proport, i-aconraond to the oit, affected as ho accepted, trans that Mr, ”^7^tahlesoon at poasible, an ^3 acceptahle fo"?Sl-2 "Sion and the Cat,. The^p"p«JVtfenr«llI? ZeftToSie-rfVi-^^trriSirar “fended f^^of thfwolropfrties is and possibility* ‘af sreSng other than ^'Dayton Paric 6M e^l”^®h»s”Md^«atorfront properties rf*“'n«rm«t?ng! Ih. meeting was adjourned. Bespectfull, Submitted, Lee E. Tomlinson Chairman Oherhauser attach: Letter from Louis 0 OOHTIWUATIOS: DAYfCHPARK Ppopo^tio® \\ ?^e?i*tional Trogrami adjournment 1 attorney ;ain »a. lated -3- 1978** comtiwatioh : DAW>1. pask x> rnMMiTTlES TO STOM** Waterfront * prop®^^^®* I: ?i^‘“Jtional Progra* adjournment rolmAUsSr®."^™- etorney o'»«CiLC •/ • »0» • •!»»« «.*-*i«ONO C. N. MV.OU lou *« •• ootl**-*uSCW Grathwol , Ploetz. Oberhauser a Thompson ATIO^NCYS and COUNSCLORS at law • C.VkAYZATA p^out C . ABO * SOIIC «»0 WAYZATA, MINNESOTA S539* |©iZ) ^75 •^^Ol >0»CNT A. AAt^OAUl. March 30, 1978 Orono Park Commission P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 553Z3 Re:Bruce Dayton Our File 6038-1 Gentlemen: Mr. Dayton in the past has Southed side of Long Lake. for park purposes « tSat Sr. Dayton would like to You have an actual ^ parties who ow. the land immediately dedicate. It is navton^also desires to dedicate his land to the West of the land oi^ed by Mr. ®ayt status of this dedica- to the City of Long Lake for par • providing you this informationtion is not known to the undersigned. But I am provioing y for background purposes.. Mr. Dayton proposes an necena^y'pro^LioM to^insure that right gift to the City will contain the ^ ^ g^ea will be open to the the land will be used for of residency race or creed, general public without restrictions as to area I would like you to nake an Srimd tor'^patk^purposes. and lnuSire:uri^r:rt,r:^d'rt^kf'uiart^"i, applied t. tp. pupuc .t large. Pn. enact wotdlu, of the deed and "-"-‘“t'alrd'pS rtSrre:i“tM':u5“? *m:s raorrotr- P-ipoeee. Payton would like to give as ouch laud as possible to the City for park - -- »»Am Orono Park Commission March 20, 1978 Page 2 purposes and In subdividing Che house from the land Co be given for park purposes would like to establish the division line on the slope which forms a natural dividing line between the house and the land suitable for park purposes. This would result In a less than two acre parcel being retained by the home, but since the bouse is surrounded by park land this variance from the current zoning law probably does not establish any precedent which would be detrimental to the long range plans of the City. Sincerely, LOUTS B. OBERHAUSER LB0:vl cc: Mr. Bruce Dayton c UKC MlliNnONRIMmJI\]£HAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD Of MANACIBS: Di#id M. Cochrm, Ptt, • H 0»lf Pilmtliw • Albtrt L Ithmin • Jamtt S. Fuiifll • J«in Winiimt February 22, 1978 Mr. Timothy I. Marr, District Engineer Hennepin County Park Reserve District P.O. Box 296 Maple. Plain, Minnesota 55359 Re: Permit Application No. 78-18 Location: Lake Katrina Wetlands Near Trunk Highway 12 Orono-Medina Purpose: Wetlands Fill for Trail Construction Dear Mr. Marr: At its meeting on February 16, 1978 the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District reviewed the subject permit application. It found the project as pleuined to be in accordance with the Rules and Regulations and Guidelines of the District and, therefore, granted the permit as submitted. Permits are valid for one year. Please contact us at 473-4224 when the project is about to commence so an inspector may view the work in progress. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District E, A. Hickok, P.E EAH/cml D. Cochran - MCWD G. Macomber — MCWD H. Muhich - Orono D. Roehl - Medina E. Schultz - DNR WATERSHtO lOUROEtT / OMKk 'ison »»»« runk Highway 12 ruction :d of Managers of ;wed the subject -ordance with the District and. ect is about to in progress. K. S4 Rev. 74 ^ STATE OF KIKS-ESOTA I DEPARTMENT of KATDRAL RESOURCES ^Division of Waters, So.ls ( Mineral STATE OF MIKS-ESOTA 1 Minerals application for per >iit to ^x )rk in public waters (print or ti/pa appi _____ quarter sectlon(s) __ _ _ _ _ _, section(s) _ _30- -, township no.(s)- -U?- -. ran*o(s)- -^ Box 296, Haole Plain MN !35339 ■- -- (fir» no., box no. or addreee)(lot, block 6 suldivieionf »»./(!..) _ _ _HeenSEl!!- -• *• “- -Ute lak. cr - - - - - - herewith aJ»d Bade a part hereof. pgopO'AL IT IS PROPOSED TO: CD excavate, ZX7 CD coMtruct, £Z7 renove, (eheek) CD install, CD abandon, or CD otherfapeei/pi ---- TOE F0110WII«;> I—7 ■*“, Cl shore-protection, CD shoreline,^I7 harbor, chaiwel. ZZ7 bridge, “!iSj H culCe^ZH? whirf, CD obstruction, or CD otherZape^/V^ ------------:-------------- JUSTIFICATION Explain why this project is needed: #«,.hr»rc#. bike ’ • To complete the Baker Park Reserve Trail Loop which will provide for horse, bike, hike and snowmobile trails. environmental impact 1. Anticipated changes in water and related land resources: The Edge of the marsh will be filled Water levels should not be affected 2. Unavoidable but anticipated dctriaental effects: The plant and animal communities in the area of the filling will be destr»yed S. Alternatives to the action proposed: Do not complete trail loop. PROJECT SITE DATA 1. Describe the type and amount of aquatic vegetation present: Cattails, Sedge, Reed Canary Grass 2. Describe the nature of the material beneath the Marsh’ Muck 3. Describe the nature of the upland area: Brome Grass 4. Describe type and amount of nearby shoreland developDent: None 5. ENCLOSE SKETCH DESCRIBING WATER LEVEL FLUCTUATIONS. fs0S inatructiont) ^(conivnuad on reV€TB0 nctf/ ATTACH EXTRA SHEETS IF NECESSARY venuaent lot(s) e ___, range(s)^ lock A suldivUvoni f lake or ttrecm} 1% for a penait to vork in ike er infornation submitted m channel. £17 bridge, i/Vi Harsh_________ vide for horse, bike; ig will be dest»->yed- ATTACH EXTRA SHEETS IF KECESSARY S .''V CONSTRUCTIOH DATA (also attach sketch or dnrHKg) w-54 Channelling^ TotAl length (feet) Existing Proposed Ungth in lahe/strraa (feet)- - - Bottoa width (feet) ------- Side slopes (ratio) ------- Average depth (feet)- - - — - - Gradient (%)• ------- — - Alterations along shore Distance along shore (feet) Distance watervard (feet) Thickness of fill material (feet) Proposed 1200 Ft. . - .3 Ft, Depth of excavation (feet) 1. Describe type of excavation equipment to be used, if known: Estimate use of cats and scrapers or trucks and loader 2. Describe location (include rap) and characteristics of spoil disposal site proposed: N.A. S. Would maintenance excavation be necessary! (check) L ! YES L—1 hO Explain: N.A. 4. Volume of material to be xcDOved initially (cubic yards)i Muck or silt N.A. Sand or gravel _ _ _ _:_ _ _ _ Rock or stone SEE NOTEATTAClDiEWTS /~7 $1S.00 filing fee, CJ photographs, C3 other (specify) See attached description £ naps Applicant declares that infom-tion submitted herewith and stateoents Mde herein are a true and correct representation of the facts, and that the filing of this application and infornation with the Commissioner of Natural Resources is prina facie evidence of the correctness thereof. COMPLETE APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO: City of Medina SaiM of exty or Urjnehip Dated this 27th day of January 19 78 Signed District tngineer (appticcKt) street S post office Hftnneoin County Park Reserve Dlstrlct (lessee) f21 Minnehaha Creek Watershed 0ist.__ Name of uatershea district (5) Shoreland Managehent Adjxinistrator of ____*' County Address ^9^ City Hsp 1 ft P131 n State HU Zip code 55359 State of Minnesota } County of ) on this day ss.AFFIDAVIT Phone 19 before ne pe.*sonnally appeared ^7^ tr who being first duly svom and to r.e known to be the person ___ application, acknowlcdge(5) that A-X. _ executed the sksne as who executed the forf»going own free act and deed and that the statenents, paps. plans, docu?nents, and other supporting data are true and correct according to best knowledge and belief. it'ft Check for filing fee Is being processed and will be sub jted, by 2/6/78, J/ IXA^SAUlAJUULliXAJUlAJUUAUIAJU^Kotar^Publlc S ,ruH ------------ bounty rAXf punuc - miwnssota F^y cossnission ex3tgjf.j> J w:wsfFiM county • • i ^ V. Ccxy*.n*:« II, |Ma > H-S4 attach sketch or dnrHng) ions along shore Proposed e along shore (feet)1200 Ft. e watcrvard (feet) ss of fill material (feet). . .3 Ft. >f excavation (feet) Dader posal site proposed: /—7 KO Explain: or silt See attached description £ naps r.adc herein arc a true and correct id information with the :tness thereof. 27th day of January itrict tngineer (apptiesKt) Ieoin County Park Reserve Pistrict (lessee) 296 le Plain Zip code 55359 Phone I*73”^593 e pc.’sonnally -.ppeared Ayr vho executed the foregoing own free act and deed and a are true and correct according ^i^AA^JjUAMUUJUULjUUUULU .’-221 lev. 74 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARBENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Waters, Soils and Minerals NOTIFICATION OF PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT = ms.- "" A) The chief executive officer of the city or to>mshlp within which may affect. you ™ST certify having nerved the complete application on the above in the box on the bach side of^the application form W-S4. Lro"re%ppirc«irn°iroiid%e"uta!ft:d io tb^^ ment Program for the affected county. couplet, this fora, for each notice served on a local governuent official ♦ . * * ** * * ** * * ** * * * ** * * * ♦* * * ** * * * • SECTION I (TO BE COUPLETED BY APPLICANT) TO: A) Chief execuUve otflcer of the feheeW /57 city, CJ tovmship of__________lUiai(print or type name) B, secretary of the beard of managers of the watershed district. (■print or type name) C) Administrator of the shore land management program of_ county. (print or type name) Maple PlainTicnothy I. Harr District Engineer - 55359 Date:r-"“...........-r'" tovnty ’’^tk Reserve P tt box 296.H bbp._ Sprint or type name and address oj January TJ t 19 78 ...........................................................................................................................*..............................................................................* * * instructions FOR THE LOCAL GOVER.NMENX This report from provides y^ an den^the Requested permit. Resources to assist in , , agencies to officially approve or disapprove the '^neror1:^e“-^-“::M«lo;. It is re,uested Cr^ocS eSncKs indicate the following, es applrcav,.-. A The relationship of the proposed project -.r-ai plans for b’ ?^ffemrorsMroF"ir l-al land use controls including flood plain and/or shoreland regulations. (continued on reverse side) VumV V w-221 ' > supply a complete copy allowing: within which shed district^ ch your project ove an the box on the back copy and all supporting of the Shoreland Manage- jfficial. ********** e ShpeUinen. factual data avaUaUa coace„i„. t.. waae. c. aha P. Sr/«'iocaX C,ecaXo„a. jitnar"x»"r: - needed. *********** «c;.* ~ —irr"" .a« The appllc^t «»ed on ahe fello-ing co^nenas 2l'sutaWr-S?-E3Sn3nmSrl5^, ah. Departoena of Naaural Resources. fpe name) eek watershed district T'nme) pint or type rumej January 27 > county 19 78 . M u # # ♦ ♦ ♦***** he Department of Natural the requested permit, pprove or disapprove the desired. It is requested plans for the controls including (Attach additional cUatc if ncaassary) return TO; S"f“Lrs!'soifsTmnerals Regulations Unit^ Centennial Building St. Paul, MN S5155 Dated Gov’t Official’s name---------oTtiPJ Signature Title Address r2T%m^ rasiiTi mw jm - ■ I. 'vt Kvm Drive : split of property approved by the final plat draw- to provide access eted at that time fee was ever pata- :e tax parcels owned 140 ft. lot width . in area (.85 acre), or 5 sewer units, two units vjere :e delinquest to TO: Planning Commission from: a. P. Olson. Village Planner DATE: April lA. 1978 . . - 1340 North Arm Drive Dg. proposed Subdivisi ^ Edward T. Johnson sketch puh eeviev, This aPP“‘=^'^Svt"an/hoS\lnda. .i .errh Av. orive approveH h^the_ 'f:n'Hoiembr26. 1973 *''«::',3%“"prov«e access i"“£%P"’^^e'dirisior«rs^er« =°^f,f„as evtr paid.s. “ ~r.v,r.-.5.'.rn'The property scii- by the same party. . three lots each meet the U ^ ^ acre). The are only 37,000 sq. ft. in ^ '‘^its.requirement but assessed for :> sewe nn.« ri'rnnertv was original y _-i two units were ru'.Tr»-• “ 1973. 379 Drive lit of property >roved by the lal plat draw- arovide access d at that time was ever paid, ax parcels owned ft. lot width , area (.85 acre). 5 sewer units, units were 1975 *«• “ "• houses into ond °ut „ to rood I t subject Ayes (4) - -'/v$300. iiotion, Ayes ^ j ^ | M-ssoncoU .novod V,-alsh sccondod.^to “ rovL of the being granted ?€rio .oing Oc4li'‘> ^ of 16; *«/t"d'trr'ougU and over tot 5 to <> -- rrofon“oMr?trra "abdication fund. Village of Oro complied with These tonditions are ^ building permit. •rorn/rve'sTi) ->^ays(0). welsh -ved Butler seconded. i»T?gTohnston rrditt- tyes (4) - Nays (0). A A to tllC Welsh moved, ®“*aer ?econde^.^ to. ga conditional use ?ej«t B of the Shi TonVa^ “oretatton>s Pl-^« frcated*in'G?e« Palls Montana. Jhis^ . ‘b^ditional “ae permit wrl^^^ inspection. ^rtibr//eHi^ • sutler moved. NelsN seco dedrrtrtitrbn‘'*thf boSthon that parcels ^ ?isolved that parcels C^.^6 dwelling umt ILH ,itsK"“<subdivision permit any any other “p^orefty” ^ Butler moved, i'assengale seconded.^to^^PP ^^^^^^ r ro”th ”e“fa“ct trartt 5s the^highest a„d^_^^„^ «!! f„'d °tUe'5bd?vidual has no distur^^ _ Page 4 oudinakcu no . 158 iioving houses ! boU%'’";.nston Addition j ^5fgiS^n5^^rAddition SKI TONKA fi®?i5,it« Biological Institute variance 2675 Fo3C Street <s. Paj»e A 1?HINAKCE NO. oviiig Houses c:?i jX6'’joLston Aadition NO assess-ients V 5 Johnston Addition TONKA Institute variance 2675 Fox Street VILLAGE OF ORONO >«■« the Village Councilf ..:H0 Vinn,c council SbcUhfuLr, Conncilnen Butler. Dorn. Massengale, and Welsh. Born ™oved. Butler seco„aedthat^the^Mlnutcs rp'prrvfd!";on'oi:Vyes C^S, - Nays (0). *;nn the Park Commission, Dr. Councu"of a Department ofinformed the hearing regarding Natural was hlld at thethe Luce Line Trail wnic^^ questionnaire Orono the’Park Commission would Tike^tf diftH£ure%o^^he owners of property abutting the Luce Line Trail. Mayor 0^®’^^®^^ro„,mil|ion^consider allowing that the Park -ns on their property individuals to t;,ey u. uot Interrupt “l^e'coLfnSiry'of tie ?rail. Mr. Paurus jid not"have^a quorum Tt^^hei? September 17, 1973 present Planning Commission memb* Thompson, asked tfiat ^^“^^/appUcations without Schuett, i"®,ission recommendation. 'formal Planning Commission eMr;i.n.:Kt; shS!-‘ the moratorium "J? e°"i'"|Jieh time the Zoningi^:!n^i:t;rtir™«ri"d%“rLfnr^ta« recommendations. . . ._ _ __ i 7:30 P.M. .//o c ■ M [ NU ri;S luce line TRAIL planning commission reques DICON - FINAL PLAT 1465^Long Lake Boulevard Adminisirai-ui -- / v di at Born moved. Butler seconded that^he^preUmlnarylaf^ Siri^^i--trasrrorner£the p^ Lots 1 f. ^ (eccess to 1151 ^ ^ot 1. enter --'■‘"^nfviriSf ?l:r;:^.eI;;■-d reasonah.o b«au|e"of the unique -^;;Xj°l,,'"L'ls”say.‘’ Mayir Oiicrhauscr abstained. 5 (0) 7:30 P.M. // (H) q. Q ^ I •'. •■ MiNurr.s DATE: November 21, 1973 Dexter K.arston, Zoning Administrator Assessment Clerk SUBJECT: Sever Unit Charnel d d:j LUCE LINE TRAIL planning commission REQUES DICON - FINAL PLAT VARIANCE r 9. U6rLong Lake Boulevard IX^LIMINARY plat «(151 5 Loma Linda Avenue r.r your reouost. th. toitoulng list shous the orlalo.l amount assessed against e.ich lot. SAGA HILL. BLOCK 8 - Pl«t A3120 No. of Units, 2/5.' 2/5 ' 2/5 o:.’ 2/5 N ; 2/5/ 1/2 N r 1/2^ 1/2. , 1/2 > 1/2 V Unit Charge Foot age Charge 1625 1650 1675 1700 1725 2200 2225 22 50 2275 2300 2325 .aj$508.00^ . 50P .00 \ . 390.00 508.00 00 390.00 635.00 635.00 635.00 635.00 635.00 635.00 390.00 390.00 390.00 390.00 390.00 390.00 487.50 jtJi ^ ^ lonab I e i *N V_. Village of Orono II p.o. UOX B6. CHYSTAL HAY. MINNi. • MLMCI»’AL OKKK K-S I IIONK: 3 On ihe North Shore Lale Mirnietoniif t O jj A / (■ JM o r ./ /"/0.. J)c... February 13, 1974 ' E4 »^le Wanous Apodal Assessment Dept Hennepin County Court House Mln»^eapoll s, Mi nnesota 55415 Dear Mr. Wanoua, The Orono Village council has reduced the following assessment: Levy 5382 Plat 43120 Parcel Original tot al Assessment Corrected total Assessment ^ i62y from $ 781.00^to $ 273.00 X 1650/if 898.00 If 390.00 1675^n 898.00 If 390.00 ^ 1700 ft 898.00 ft 390.00 ' 1725 n 898.00 m 390.00 Sincerely, h ; — / ** —> / Dorothy Assessment' Clerk 1 200<C 0et, .1 i A ' , /Spc) '. fcirfi''» ^ p ^ » V "T--------------- •> • % 2c 71 3 *fs “ “ 5_p -,-f ' c^ 7w ® *- cn . ‘ • ‘ ~ . ^ Z ^--i. i t Sj -vl — I / / J.' IS »/ >?7 X "1st N , 5 / (? \ LV \ t'* \ 'V>^ «/V /' I r.v^^; / /■ (\^o%o-(r ^ C^ooll- • • / Hil. Jf S'- I \ ro\t* V oi '.r 'v‘. 7 X*i, x*' ^AZl^m **1^1 V X rsi » — «•. V < /V,1 ____— ^0/\Q d RWE N o 151 . -■■■.• -•«-“ c. ♦. ! ' Vr 75 «• ?• <y*.--T-vr* ^ /Tk 1 7 L B.,.^ «■ o\ = i^ri.r jH. V___V .75 ^'i -tjv '.v/ -/-• fi* 1a> ACP V 7^-b <r V'^ * • > r r #38 -■i » ; TO: Planning Commission and Council FROM: A. P. Olson, Village Planner DATE: April 20, 1978 ( RE:Jack Safar, 925 Partenwood Rd, Vari.-^nct 34.440, 31.310 The applicant is requesting a variance for construction of a private dock on Outlot A of the Partenwood sub division. Mr. Safar has made an offer on Lot 1, Block 3 upon which he intends to erect a home. At the time of the plat approval for Partenwood on June 26, 1972, Outlot A was created as lake access for Lots 1 and 2, Block 3. See attached covenants which were in the City files. Current regulations prohibit construction of a dock on detached outlots; hence the variance request. No comments exist in the record concerning the proposed use of the outlot. Note the applicant's comments on the application form regarding overall shoreline density. Review of this application should also address future dock requests for Lot 2, Block 3. i.e., the outlot was obviously originally intended for use by two lots and up to four boats. Is this boat density reasonable or not, and should any allowed dockage be in one or two separate structures? V •' -k •• V • • . • »' • •• I >• I * il • \ cm 0? ORao, ^^Dk'^OTA / #„ oo I.O.^f]uS’ OF PRo?Ch.\L Cor KBgiJEST A'iiJross ____PflrtGnwood Subdivvslorit Orono» Minn6sotd L'*/^al Dss'ii'ipticn_Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Partenwood Subdivisioj APPLICAVr rv\^jTO Jack W. Safar__________________^ 559-1711 Address ^^00 No. Nathan Ln., Plymouth,’Mn. 55441 a\\ER Karo Mr. & Mrs. George Johnson P^one I 471,9072 Address 835 Partenwood Rd., Long Lake, Mn. 55356 Present Zoning__L R'^l B Present Use Zodiag Ordinance Socticn Relating to Req^iest 3jj3]o/^^4o Specify Ordinance Raquirerc-nts i Conditional Use Variance Kctlands Variance Riprap >0 R v#f^ FOR OFFICLAL USE CNLY Ca.ncil Action Date Approved Denied J^plain Request Relative to Re^ir^onts r//,: ..A/ f-^7 ?/ •<ia2dsWpsdt^:£i6j^grfYc Uhe subject plat was a-proved (Dec. 22, 1972) prior to the existing dock ordinance (31.310/" • 34.440), variance now required by-City. Further, total shoreline within plat is more than adequate to coinply with required 150 ft. of shoreline per ‘building site, including off-lake The subject pia^has I3j>uilding sites w/approx. 2700 feet gT~Sh0fellog, therefure,' of shorelii1 - oiiurciinct tne KATERIAL hJECESSARlf K)R OQ!*lPLEre APPLICATIQK exceeding 200 ft. fiist be submitted 1 vetlc prior to Council ^?eetin^ P®'* 1. Arolication conpleted 2. Plat liap Section 3. SuKey (Sketch in proposal) 4. Certified Property Ou-nsr*- List of o-ners within / .50 ft.) from Hennepin County Registrar of Deeds 5, i^O Fee 50 Date 11 April, 1978 ___ Signature _ \ • PMTCfiJUJ^O r" H )A. Walking paths may be maintained within the Wildlife Sanctuary providing that the maintenance does not materially interfere with the natural growth of that area. Any planting, trimming, pruning or removal of plant life within the area requires approval of the Architectural Committee. It is the intention of the Declarants herein that Lots B and C be forever dedicated to the uses of a Wildlife Sanctuary as described herein, and in the event that the combined owners of Partenwood should at any time divert Lots B and C to any other use than that provided for herein, then such lots shall revert to the Village of Orono to be held by the Village as a public area devoted to a Wildlife Sanctuary in accordance with these conditions and restrictions. ii I* 1 • Covenants and Restrictions of Out-Lot A It is intended that Out-Lot A shall be owned by the owners of Lots One (1) and Two (2) of Block Three (3) of Partenwood. It is intended that the owner of Lots One (1) and Two (2) of Block Three (3) of Partenwood shall each have an undivided interest in Out-Lot A. The purpose of Out-Lot A is for the sole reason of pro viding a place for those two lots to have lake access and to maintain a dock for the pleasure and recreation of the owners of those two lots. Out-Lot A, therefore, may be used only by the owners of Lots One (1) and Two (2) of Block Three (3) and the use and enjoyment shall be subject to the following conditions, restrictions, limitations and covenants; A. B. C. There shall be no launching of power boats, pontoon boats or power craft, of any kind, from Out-Lot A. There shall be no docks erected or maintained within twenty feet of either side of Out-Lot A. There shall be no structures of any kind erected on Out-Lot A and this includes but is not limited to boat houses, on shore docking facilities, guest houses, anf! fish houses. Landscaping shall not be allowed without the approval of the Architectural Committee. D. E. There shall be no parking of vehicles of any kind on Out-Lot A. Out-Lot A shall not be used for any use or activity which is not compatable with the other lots in the Partenwood area. The docks erected or maintained on Out-Lot A may be used only by the owners or the - 13 - I ; •! O occupants in residence of Lots One (1) and Two (2) of Block Three (3), Partenwood Addition, and such docks or facilities for docking may not under any circumstances be used, loaned or made available to any boats owned by or used by any other persons other than those who are either the owners of or in residence at Lots One (1) and Two (2), Block Three (3), Partenwood Addition. F.There shall not, at any time, be kept at Out-Lot A more than two watercraft by any one owner or resident, and no watercraft, of any kind, in excess of twenty- three (23) feet in length shall be moored, stored, or kept at the dock maintained on Out-Lot A. ' G.It is also intended that all of the other conditions, restrictions, and limitations with respect to type, placement, and color of docks, boats, watercraft, etc. shall apply to Out-Lot ^ the same as they apply to all other lots in the Partenwood Addition; except that, in the case of conflict the provisions of this Section IV shall prevail. H. A small sign designating Out-Lot A as private property shall be permitted upon said property. It is the overriding intention of the declarants herein that Out-Lot A is intended to serve the purpose of pro viding lake access for the owner or resident of Lots One (1) and Two (2), Block Three (3) of Partenwood Addition, and that any use of Out-Lot A must be consistent with the residential character of the Partenwood area, and it is intended that the use of Out-Lot A shall be a more re strictive use than that available to the other lots with in the area. It is also intended that Out-Lot A shall forever be kept, maintained and used only for the purposes outlined here in. Any violation of the provisions, conditions, or re strictions contained herein shall warrant the declarants or any other lot owner to apply to any court of law or equity having jurisdiction thereof for an injunction or proper relief in order to enforce same in the court, and, in its descretion, may award the plaintiff his court costs and reasonable attorneys fees. No delay on the part of the declarants or any other person in the exercising of any right, power or rrmedy contained herein shall be con strued as a waiver thereof or an acquiescence therein. Various rights and remedies of all persons hereunder shall be cumulative and the declarants or any other property owner may use any or all of said rights without in any way affecting the ability of the declarant or any other pro perty owner to use or rely upon or enforce any other right. i - 14 - •'■■•■■■■• ■• • ■■■' ■■■■■' .. '■■■ I' ' • ■ ■ ■ ■ iiv.v'i'-y : ■- . /■ ■... ■ : • ■ •■' • ■ ;;• '•• .•;>■:■.'• ■■■ I V,* •*.f • *• - •••!..• .*•••• i ‘ !•. * . •» .. . riV. •• • i .1 • • • • ' • • • • ■ i . ' / • • ■• .••••/.•.• . V <• •. ^ ^ . . r:. • .• • • • .. ■ / -• :r - '•• •'• *• / . i t .vV •*. ‘ •' • .4 Z% — . • C V * - / ■ **• * *t « • . . • •1 ~2}.2oct,: \ ^•5> ■ VoV <5^-i':., - - stVjix ■ ieVjJ / LOI 01>" • ART.EN WOO q.. '»«!' efcST *;®‘ S yjr *•>*fe"c»s-2 fA ,1/ >T 2 /"r, * Sir/ > O % • • * •; 1 141^ V T ***#> vC ** M* * .O . •" .* • t t ..• \ J;-: r*.* ► *. •• • f •' . .v J.vV.v ' »,* ^ . •*• •• • ^ • V • :V X • • \ \X: . i / £/LST -A . - \^X ^ ?lAt cf S'Xrn:r fcr Cr^or^c R. Johr.scr. in C-utlot A, Partanvcod Henr.oplr. Co’U'.ty, Minnesota V- • • .4 :> i • ‘Iv ‘ '•• V • • ' * f .J t- • • • . V \ . .1• *' . -'*1 y n#»t of Ibf \ • Pocif •; •■ Certificate of Sumroy; I hereby o-rtlfy that tbi? is a trt:o and correct represontaticn of a surrey of the bouadaries cf that part of lying East of the follcvdng-descrited line: ConEcncing at the Intersectlcn of the rib''*t-cf-tfay line of Partacuood Head vith tte North line of said outlet; thence on an asstsed bearing of East i.%' • •: X f •• .i xants or encrcachaenta. Scale: Date : o : = 50* 8-27-75 Iron aer/car • « ;■ * * ♦ -• V V . ' >- 'a: ■• »•• '-4 • -r-- . . . • -■ -rvy • 4 .••r.• •. • * • V, > V- ■' .. m ^ ■ » : •* ■mt 7if » » ''f 7'irr.-r ; f. .i .• t f. i :.-::^/ i/f •' / • 5* ' '/-5 j .:: / . •• TI— « # r V i ^ ^ ^ VJ /^ ' ’. V V . -v -■ • S-. „V oo'o V' r.'v-.O -VlV’-V o •^■ * •.^.‘ ^ V. 1. Pk 5 . I- I i f * ^ Q O O ■nr CJ' TO: Planning Commission and Council FROM:. A. P. Olson, Village Planner DATE: April 20, 1978 RE:David Butler, 4685 North Shore Drive Variance 34.452 The applicant proposes to expand his existing house over onto the adjacent lot which he has just (is going to?) purchase. A variance was granted on November 22, 1976 for an addition to the existing house, which addition has not yet been completed. The total property is 27,600 sq. ft. or .63 acre. All setbacks are met except front yard where 27.5 ft. is proposed vs. 35 ft. required. This setback Is to a platted undeveloped alley. Staff recommends variance approval. i cmf 0? ORao Candition.^1 krd Vi CF Pf{0?Ct^\L (or pro^c-rly) a^^tcss SJiorc J)_rii^<^^ APPLICW ________J^e / y/j TS8c #4382 A««ss j^SuivlLU‘cc.Am,_ av^'£R Karo _______::_____________ Address jy r 7//7 FTrone # Present Zoning L/6>Present Use Z^iag Crdmance S^cticn Relating to Re»^.ttst Spiciiy Ordinance Recjuircrient^i TjTo of )<5CJ!FST ___Conditional Use ri.~nce Kctlands VariAnca _ Riprap FOR OFFICL^L USE a>^Y Council Action Data Approved Iknied II Explain Ktc^uest Relative to Re^ir^rits I Extent o£ Nan-confonnity i^Mps to Pnyeity ^our reasats for xeqfBstiii* tMs Variance or Coilitlonal Use Penult \ M^uERIAL KECEf^ARY PTiP nnfeOT PtC 4o d4 iRIAL I^CESSARY FOR COf-PLElE APPLICATION , (Itjst be submitted 1 vtsdc prior to Council Fieatin^ z’ Certified Property 0,7^r*s List of 3. Sun-ey (Sketch m proposal) fpo^ Herjicpin Cc«mty KegbtrS?"©^ Dcgds 5. $i0.00 Fee Date Sigr_iture \ I • 1 I CmCMC^A P* ^ r uAV 1 . <^AUS »• • t^'-o* • 1 <; T'‘ V 4 ‘ . /i .1 J TO:W. R. Benson, City Adninistrator FRO?!:A. P. Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator # irr J H\TE:October 26, 1976 SURH:CT: David Butler - 4685 North Sliore Drive Variance - Lot Area and Lot V.'idth Tlie applicant proposes to add a two bedroom, single story addition to the existing duelling on this property. The existing building and the proposed addition meet all the required setbacks including the lakcshore setback. Tlie location docs not appear to conflict with any neighbor's views of the lake. The variances requested are for lot area (16,800 sq. ft. actual vs. 43,560 sq. ft. required =» 26,760 sq. ft. variance, 61i) and lot wid^ (110 ft. actual vs. 140 ft. required » 30 ft. variance, 211). PLANNING COfnSSICN MEETING - Novenfcer 15, 1976 Recomnended approval of variances because of configuration of lot and no additional land is available and proposed addition would meet required lot line setbacks. COUNCIL ^EETING - Noveniier 22, U76 Approved variances as per Planning Consnission findings. ' f i J Plat, of Survey for Divld J. Outler in lx>t 7ft, Tonltnvlnu Cnrdone Honnopin Count.v, Hinnoaot« -#383 a of roHiricato of Gurvoj: I hfr^by certify that thle ia and correct representation n siirvay of the boimdnrlea of all that part of Lot 78, Tonkavlaw Car-iann, Hennepin CountT, Minn., des- rrlbod ns fnllowa: Pefrlnnlnf^ at a point in the North line of said Lot 78, vhlc^ point in feet Rartarly from the Nerthueat ^cmer of said lot; thence fiOnthweatarlV Inn atralpht line to a pfilnt on the «:horo of La^»e Mii.netnnka dla- tant feet Goutheenterly reanirped alone the shore of aari lake from tho Southwest corner of said Lot 78; thence So!)U.eastarIy alonp the cJiore of said lake P4.^5 font to the Sonthenstcrly comer of said lot; neld last named corner also being the most Southerly corner of raid Lot 78; thence Northeast erly along the r#outheasterl'' line of raid lot a distance of ?l,C: feet to the moat Kaaterly comer of snld lot; thence Kortriucnieriy nlonp the Northeasterly ard Northerly lines of said lot a dlst^mc*^ of IP*^.f*^et to the point of loginning, the location of all exist!nr V>u!ldlnga thora->i,, and tho proponed location of a proposed addition,. It does not purport to show othe^ Irnnrovenonts or encroach- nanta. For purposes of thla survey, tho distances in the deacriotlon to bo taaaaured along the shorn h*ive bion asrumn ! to be dlstanroa measured alone the surveyor*3 traverse 11 n*- back from the sh.oro, as s Scale: 1^ 50* Date I 10-19-76 o t Iron marker Iw^nd fiurvoyor and Planner Ix>nf Lake, Minnesota <fj ^iot V*'» 'onViTv!*'v . .; : •■ .,. .»■#'“•■ ■' .-V OFJlr- v;; JV|?.-;:..v \ T i.: 1 J.- -A'- &: \ V • •• > Vv ^ e'J •«<^M »Xr y !if' 4^ -w " •■•.4 - u-. .. 'A.; iw-< !► . y' ••^0/. • •■: ■** ' - V . • ■ .' .%■ '' :<• * Ad I f>T Sur*.'*?v: 1 hBralgr e^rtity tt.it v.i.«i; in «i tnvt f.n,'*. rnrr^^i n*f»ivfW5B*.?»tl«n <»f ti wnwsy »»f thft -♦■ :<nt. •jsw’rtr**-, nm! tv.- InriMon '^^■ ®f <ui <ifi<*rorrMnN fcr-'.ti'ftw**. Ti ’.in* •n*r'v»Tt to nluwi ct^.or Ir'W'H'Bnrtnt.t or «rcro«rhnM»ta. Se«lttt l*r M>* DaU I in.io.% t iRWi MrlMr , / (iordnrk P. Co’’^!rr-«» .^r* l/tnd turirtiyior ani : iM.t.or Vntc Uiko, t-.lBPOft'-t* if-'^ . M ‘A ' MC1§4 44.^^ Q OJf O O <0 ISO record »c PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAME . LoA^&firAD Lou,<i P ^c'u.o'^ecL^ ^r-e'^e M/tAce.^ ,Jg DeA'Ajo K. tAey^t^ ^ •46 50 MO. ^rtO*:e P^. —cvi^d.* jam_5 SJ4.4 — ^\«otv//Ai « nsTTY HCAJMC-iM 4441 *rc*A.*Av/«t^ ^amc. mcua(1>^—_ •.?-f>.3'Ci.4 ’- A70S ^ SrA^'tc^ £x^. x_iAJ MA^gl/A- j>1 > g/Cjg ADDRESS -Be g.GLOJ^T-^, WI c. KL-U^j Dj3 P/\(^. >s ^11 •• - __ ncotii c; l>.3 H;n!»- C®* F*®®"®* giv. u.L-.ubcs'.oimyi«>®'-W nUr^o. V ~ O "TOfi'^ 3qOESCRtPfToN ' ^ LOT P^fVT- AZ.OOQ R£g>L-s>reggD L, Pi_/^T- 4-3/32^ J^A/xr/Sr m ; - iW 4cdo Ajo. sMope p> mci-iAJfi. uaOAL,__ ft AT“ ^3 ‘^/^Q B.ICH/USO F. M/>/?z-/x/ /g. He.PoLA .^KiAeo 3aajaq .r.«vf<e A1oi:5A/g5 6aj7k>t^ L Yrttc£.fteAi \/m /4^/JS^ rftHry* C Ia/aa^ A^. 7^irKteMt I37S f^nr <ft>. >5elc. 7 T M7 Pi^AT ^!3^~T gtfsr pio/Ajr £o«o QgQAJO^ /v1<aJAj> R AT- .4.3500 <J"ii ccs r ^OU^3D, ^!^_S55c4-_ ) SO<S I * As.M>r Cp /y>tst f/10^ nrtAj .^S JC. ^ ytZS AcvPt\ S^e=.YC^ S3: PfMtT Of^ LOT A- . Uors liZ. Bc-K^ t-or.3 - e»CK 4r i-oj- <2 43^_<?/^\rx c3jg_cPT iigrc tiU^\J£s jJa_ I034f XKA^c.r e> BLK.I PARCEL s. 4. j^AZ£. OlK>. A.L^ 6>C>OC^ 300.0. 4 SOQ 5gg AT-T-ACA/g O K-2.B Pr OP Ge^ cor 2. co«4fP»paMOM^ fir. ZOj A/aCLjag tor/# /Icsr /Ir. 70/0 .( .erci 3000 Lora 7Z 4 73 Lots 7 5 4 7<t 46 ^5 -c/- shokE Oe, tnoLM/O. roAt peni*i*i A. t^eyeE 44 PO A/. 3 rfOt^4: 43*.*, 2Z fr OP Lor 7<9 i-y64i »£6y..L Ar OP Lmt 7S i.YtAje^ U*.V.. \mrteL. r>T OP L4aya 79 4 An 6:5^0 iSaZQQ 6>»50 7000 7/00 72 to 732Q. PROPOSED' STIELOW'8 ADDITION #337 OWNER AND OtvaOPER: iURGEN S11ELOW ?5M UPTON AVE. SO. MPLS. MINN. r 47S-1611 SURVEYOR AND DESIGNER: EGAN. FIELD & NOWAK. INC. 7415 WAYZATA BLVD. • MPLS. MINN. •546 -f)837 DESCRIPTION; Icti 1. Z, 4.5. 6 and 7, Ajdiiors Sufcdivsion Numlier ZP7. Hf.nnejin County. Minnesota. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared b> ne or under my direct supervisen and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Ians ol the State of M. nesota. Dated this Oth day of April. 1978. EGAN. FIELD i NOWAK. INC. S urveyor s '■ -Uiit ■mW MINNESOIA registration NO. o*»3 .4f^a ir^' 474a