Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-27-1978 Planning Packet■‘rW-V AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 27, 1978 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:30 P.M. I. CURRENT ITEMS A. Action Items 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. #317 Tim Adams - Farm at Long Lake - 820 Brown Road South Subdivision • Final Plat 4. #323 - James Lawrence • 1550 Sixth Avenue North (Tanglewood) Subdivision - Final Plat Approval 5. #359 • Betty Buesgens - 3067 Farview Lane Wetlands Variance • Bridge Over Wetlands 6. #361 - N. C. McDonald - 1225 Shoreline Drive Variance - Lot Area & Width - Side Yard Setback 7. Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 27, 1978 8. Discussion of Marina Licenses 9. #336 - Forest Arms Subdivision (Carol Sue Dongoske) B. Work Session Items 1. #360 - 2. 3. 4. 5. #362 #363 #364 #365 6. #366 - Joe Whitney - 780 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision - Sketch Plan Review of Revised Preliminary Plat Russell Johnson ~ 3508 Lyric Avenue Variance - Lot Area & Width & Structure Setback American Rebuilders (Fred Herfurth) - 2400-6th Ave. No. Subdivision - Preliminary - Sketch Plan Review Ben Dye - 115 Smith Avenue Variance - R^ar Setback New Horizon Enterprises (Mr, & Mrs. Dunkley) 2380 Shadywood Road - Conditional Use Permit Child Care Cent''r - Plus William Taylor - 2227 & 2229 Shadywood Road Subdivision - Preliminary - Sketch Plan Review C. Incomplete Items 1. 2. 3. 4. #217 #294 #306 #308 Robert Blrkeland - 1298 Wildhurst Trail Dredging Reconsideration James McCleary - 3445 Bayslde Road - Lacks Additional Data - Dredging Application for Stubbs Bay Marina Colpepper Land Co. (Neslund) - 40 Orono Orchard Rd. N. Subdivision (Preliminary) - No Revised Plan Sidney Rebers ~ 2060 Wayzata Boulevard Subdivision (Preliminary) & Rezoning Planning Commission Agenda March 27, 1978 Page 2 5. #319 6. #333 7. #348 West Shore Lafayette Bay Association 2440 Old Beach Road - Dredging & Disposal of Spoils Thomas Lyon * 4790 North Shore Drive Variance - Lot Area EULchard Ledstrom 3405 * 6th Avenue North Subdivision (Preliminary) II. COMPLETED ITEMS FOR COUNCIL 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. #334 #346 #349 #350 #352 #353 #354 #355 9. 10. #356 #357 11. #358 - George Jackson • 90 Willow Drive South Subdivision • Final Approval • Concurred Paul Raster - 2600 Casco Point Road - Subdivision (Preliminary) - Forwarded to Council for Review 3-16*^78 Paul Berglund - 4460 North Shore Drive - Variance • Lot Area & Width * Forwarded to Council for Review 3-16*78 Kelly Avenue Holding Company - Joint Use Dock Application For 1978 - Forwarded to Council for Review 3-16-78 Byrdle Robb - 2805 Wayzata Boulevard - Rezonlng - RR-IB to Industrial - Forwarded to Council for Review 3-16-78 Donald Phenlcle - 3765 Togo Road - Variance - Lot Area & Width, Side Setbacks & Rear Setback Roger Fazendln - 2700 - 6th Avenue North - Subdivision (Preliminary) - Forwarded to Council for Review 3-16-78 Ray Waterhouse - 132 Chevy Chase Drive - Wetlands Variance - Structure Location - Wetlands - Forwarded to Council for Review 3-16-78 Karl Gardner - 2885 - 6th Avenue North - Subdivision (Preliminary) - Forwarded to Council for Review 3-16-78 Dennis Platteter - 809 Brown Road North - Variance Stable Setback & Conditional Use Permit for Horses Forwarded to Council for Review 3-16-78 Tim Adams - Farm at Long Lake - 820 Brown Road North Variance - Zoning - Shoreline Requirement Forwarded to Council for Review 3-16-78 ■i- V. «>/? PX. MT6 of J-27-7P VILLMJE OF OEONO t.M» william t mills VK.IAM $msmgrn ' ■jy, ~ rtriiifiiir « I- fp H‘*2r78 , /v -'-isc.i 3;: " i4'3u .J( (• crrv f.T <)-iiV() |: \ /♦ (*<'. hl M H\>. MINN! Sul A !: }y* CITV l»F OKOXO P.O. BOX 66 crystal Bay . mlwlsota *<32? Mr. Tim Adams 820 Brown Road Nbrth long Lake, Minn. 55356 V.-c - - - ' — __ _ _ _ _ _ _ A." ... : _ I H 0.1 r «» W ,, Mr. and Mrs. Albert R. WhitmcUi 1540 Sixth Avenue Mbrth long Lake, Minn. 55356 ■Vs . r.> i 1<^ ^ ' j! •••*. rgo I’j f!=2r*>«i • • \ ^ ^C.l CITY OF OROXO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY’. MLNNtSOTA 5532.'» '5?T^T •■’ o *-rcr73 HuSTf /■ ■- ; : 0.1 3 High H. Harrison 1305 County Road 6 long Lake, Minn. 55356 .-ASfr L» mm Tf A* I ■» r ^ A ' • Ji «W* 4 • <*L CITY OF onoxo P.O. r.ox 66 CRYSTAL BAY’. MI.WISOTA «i. i- . v = 0.1 5|: awrence Wolsfeld Lake Company 127 South Tenth Street Minneapolis, Minn. 55403 :rrv of ono.vo r*v i.<»\ f M l\\\ min ! .M»I \ • *.•<#» ^ V .* v; : . . \ • Betty Jean Buesgens 16546 W. 78th Street Eden Prairie, MN 55344 CITV OF OROXO P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY. MINNESOTA 5532? North Star Marina, Inc. 3324 North Shore Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 THl*; farm at long LA* E - 820 Brown Road North Sijbdivi sion P-^ge 5 ^ fonvarding this material on ’to the City Attorney and Engineer and asV for coranents relating to the conditions which have not as yet been met. I will be requesting some direction and clarification on the questionable issues such as pedestrian casements, extent of use of easements - overlapping easement* - riparian rights - dock use and location - provisions for changing easement use or rights. STAFF - March 10, Planning Conmlsslon rambers Gloria McDonald and Jo Ellen Hurr and staff members Hank Muhich =nd A1 Olson met with Tim Adams to resolve questionable Issues which were adirressed at the last Planning Commission meeting. The roost recently srirniltted data was reviewed. This Included (1) City Engineer Jim Olson's report dated March 8, 1978, (2) Devel-.per's Engineer, Bruce Kelly's, reporr dated March 3,1978, (3) Developer's purchase agreement and riders, (4) Declaration of covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements, (5) LesT<iloper*s attorney, Steven Pflaum's letter to Bruce Malkerson dated Mar^'i 7, 1978. The questions raised ry the City Engineer were discussed. There appeared to be an agreement trst roost of these were technical Issues which could best be resolved by tae City Engineer. Steve Pflaum's letter was also discussed. Hie Planning Commission members were somewhar concerned whether these were conclusions agreed upon and approved by rhe City Attorney. A1 Olson stated that the City Attorney had approved and assured the members that he would obtain a report to this effecr before the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for March 13, 1978. The pedestrian access was left unresolved. PLANNING COMMISSION - March 13, 1978 Tim Adams was preseni:. The Zoning Administrzror introduced the latest material submitted by the developer. Jim Olson, the City ^glneer, added his comments with reference to his report. A brief sunisry of his concerns were as follows: 1. Private road - safety and erosion 2. Distinction between conservation and pasture easements <- potentially hazardous to rvinoff THl’.’ farm Ar LONG LA* £ - 820 Brow*n Road North Stjbdivision P‘3ge 5 o f I5-^ I will be foivarding rhis material on'to the City Attorney and Engineer and ask for coranents relating to the conditions which have not as yet been ir.et. I will be requesting some direction and clarification on the questionable issues such as pedestrian easements, extent of use of casements - overlapping casements - riparian rights - dock use and location - provisions for changl-.g casement use or rights. STAFF - March 10, 15 Planning Commission trambers Gloria McDonald and Jo Ellen Hurr and staff members Hank Muhich sid A1 Olson met with Tim Adams to resolve questionable issues which were ad±ressed at the last Planning Commission meeting. The most recently si±=citted data was reviewed. This included (1) City Engineer Jim Olson's report dated March 8, 1978, (2) Developer's Engineer, Bruce Kelly's, report dated March 3,1978, (3) Developer's purchase agreement and riders, (4) Declaration of covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements, (5) Desreloper's attorney, Steven Pflaum's letter to Bruce Malkerson dated Marcx 7, 1978. The questions raised ry the City Engineer were discussed. There appeared to be an agreement trat most of these were technical issues which could best be resolved by rae City Engineer. Steve Pflaum's letter was also discussed. The Planning Commission members were somewhat concerned whether these were conclusions agreed upon and approved by the City Attorney. A1 Olson stated that the City Attorney had approved and assured the members that he would obtain a report to this effect before the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for March 13, 1978. The pedestrian access was left tinresolved. PLANNING COMMISSION - March 13, 1978 l! Tim Adams was present.i The Zoning Administrstor introduced the latest material submitted by the developer. Jim Olson, the City rrglneer, added his comments with reference to his report. A brief sunrrsry of his concerns were as follows: 1. Private roat - safety and erosion 2. Distinction between conservation and pasture easements - potentially hazardous to runoff i ii THE* FARM AT LONG LAKE - 820 Brown Road North Subdivision Page 6 #317 3. Assurance of adequate on-site septic systems on all lots - possible conflict with City's position of no municipal sewering of this area After a lengthy discussion the Planning Commission agreed that many of the issues would have been resolved before approving the preliminary plat had they not felt rushed into a decision just before Christmas holidays. The Planning Commission tabled the proposal because many of the Important issues were unresolved for lack of data. The Planning Commission Instructed the Zoning Administrator to request of the City Administrator that this proposal be added to the agenda for the Council meeting scheduled for March 16, 1978. The Commission felt the urgency would require some direction from the'City Attorney and City Council. They requested some direction on the following issues: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Private road - width, surface, grade and drainage requirements Conservation and pasture easements - determination of boundaries and use On-site septic systems - necessity of soil borings and locating primary and alternate drain fields Private access easement between Lots 19 and 21 as alternate access for Lots 20 and 22 from private road, Outlot C - should this easement be indicated on plat or in title Pedestrian easement on Lot 7 to shoreline of Long Lake - extent and limits of use - possible conflict with City's policy of restriction of riparian rights for properties not located on shoreline Report from City Attorney confirming agreement with interpretations in letter from developer's attorney, Steven Pflaum, dated 3-7-78 Fence on wetlands - is variance necessary Chairwoman McDon*^ld suggested that one member of the Planning Commission attend the next Council meeting to represent the position of the Commission. The Planning Commission Informed Tim Adams that after obtaining direction on these Issues from the Council, the Commission would review the proposal again conditioned on developer providing the following additional material: 1. 2. 3. 4. Location of all existing structures in reference to proposed lot lines so variances can be addressed Private road detail (approved by City Engineer) Should private access easement between Lots 19 and 21 be indicated on plat or in title (approval of City Attorney) Location of proposed fences on wetlands if variances are necessary 1 ) J THE FARM AT LONG LAKE - 820 Brown Road North Subdivision Page 7 a STAFF - March 20, 1978 The following additional material was submitted by developer this morning: 1. Exhibit T - Road detail 2. Exhibit U - Location of existing buildings on Lot 19, Block 1 3. Exhibit V - Location of existing buildings on Lot 15, Block 1 All variances necessary regarding location of existing structures relative to proposed lot lines can be determined from these new surveys. Also enclosed is a copy of Al's memo regarding Council direction requested by the Planning Couunission. Mr, Adams informs me that a revised plan is now being prepared. The new plan will indicate some changes in pedestrian easements and more specifics in relation to pasture and conservation easements. He assures me these plans will be submitted in time to enclose in the Planning Conmission packets for the meeting of March 27, 1978, As of this date I have not as yet received report from A1 regarding City Attorney's concurrence with letter from developer's attorney. __ _I I I n liilhiii* lilM /SbkMI -7^ CLARK ENGINEERING COMPANY □ 2815WAYZATA BOULEVARD □ MINNEAPOLIS.MINN. &5405 □ 16121 374-4740 4! I ' Toi'cotu i \CCS' 1 ! A. - L%\1•1■ •I £/meir~ •».: f t-D#i£? TyPlCAL PILL TtPSCtu f SLED TOP'.Otv. ♦ ^E£t- SOO A«. NECOCD To CCH-TROU EROSION — fr'ClASS I, AlftAEiA-rc CUT WiTH DRAIV1A6E1 SWALE.C 7-^C-O AS •jEtLED TO CCNTKu:. CRCSiCN I’—._ . 20L - .............- *• , > j • -»■ C .Atl s. ASS CUf. t KT at culvcrt OATf I-IARCH i». 7# on AWN J R.s. CCMM.NO 7 ».-• 1 <♦ PROPOSED ROAD SECTIONS FOR TIK ALLxKS___________ THE FARM AT lCKGi LAKE SM?it NUMBER 1 0» 1 SMTS. -7^ CLARK ENGINEERING company □ 2815WAYZA7A BOULEVARD [3 MiNNE APOLIS, MINN 5540& □ <612) 374 47<JC • • • «• • •• •• ••• CAST ?AO !?• - « I- % LOT 19 f. t •«• s o K V IV BLOCK I \ C9tf>0§0 # Ufitif/ F§f , IS3.9* Scale I" - 100' o Denotes Iron Monument A *42*42 H* 2C oc; L* ?l 19 C*20.I4* ^ Ct« SSf*2l II 4f ..-A • 45* 00 00** C • 5? 2S‘ K • 50 00* CB ■ SB?* B0*00"W L • 54.9B* CB t h%7* 0B‘^' tr OUT lO^ > PROPOSED DESCRIPTION Lot 19, Block 1, The'Farm at Long Lake CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the laws ^^he State-of .M1ni^o^t||^ BY; ( Aa<y/< I _mi:S' 17-72 MN REG. NO. 5713 Bruce R. Kelley, P.E. 4 L.S'. DATE 3.14-7« OAAWN JRS CCMM. NO. 7839 PROPOSED LOT 19, BLOCK 1 THE FARM AT LONG LAKE FOR TIM ADAMS SHEET NUM6EN o»_2_smts. » CLARK ENGINEERING COMPANY HI! 2815 WAY2ATA BOULEVARD [” MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. 55405 Q 1612) 374 474J r i • • • • A Sll hOll 1...._/ --H V .^1 -4• I- --r»>:j|-'r~ri*' — — — — V -O^*jM’-v; >Cv -0 E cS'JI*** l*JJi '^7'S.i** \ jSfr'! -1 --»o- £xnt0fr- V #31'7| •»52»00’0t*W *2.to 14 o o b C4 house V LOT 15 BLOCK I 10*Of•)••§• O Ufillfp £9»9m§mt ^ \ I_________________•-■——I ---WEST 52 • SO - o NOTE 1. 2. Barn > 1 foot roof overhang, also a hayloft overhang* 1.2* within North line of Lot 15. Garage - 1 foot roof overhang, 0.6* within North line of Lot 15. Scale 1“ - 100' o Denotes Iron Monument PROPOSED DESCRIPTION Lot 15, Block 1, The Farm at Long Lake CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the laws of-the State,.^ Minn^t^ DATE:7 '' 7:?MN REG. NO. 5713BY: iruce R. Ke ley, P.E. & L.5.‘ OATC 3-17-78 PROPOSED LOT IS, BLOCK 1 SHiE-r NUMBl n OAAWN JRS THE FARM AT LONG LAKE 2 COMM. NO. 7839 FOR TIM ADAMS OF.?_SHTS JA Hi La Bm*« 1 S«cl It I |Utf Coil Mil lirs hm ixt f t TO:Henry F. Muhlch, Zoning Administrator, and Planning Commission FROM: DATE: A, P, Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator March 17, 1978 SUBJECT: ^317 - The Farm at Long Lake Subdivision #31* RE; The Planning Commission special request for policy guidance from the Council as reviewed at the meeting held March 16, 1978 General Council concensus was that the function of staff and the Planning Commission is to review questions of policy and to make recommendations to the Council for final determination. . Notwithstanding this, the Council indicated the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. Private roads are desirable as an alternative .to public roads for visual and rural character reasons as well as maintenance responsi* billties, but all roads should be constructed to minimum standards and criteria for public safety and for permanent ease of maintenance. The City Engineer should make recommendations as to technical requirenents. The City has had continuing problems with unsupervised easements to lakeshore and has philosophical problems with extending lakeshore "rights” to inland properties. The staff can legally provide language to restrict any such easement to whatever use or intensity should be desired as a matter of policy. In this particular instance, and because the developer is agreeable, the issue may be avoided by physically stopping the easement at a reasonable distance from the shore, such as 5 ft. or 20 ft. or at the edge of the conservation easement, or? Conservation easements may include compatible uses and horse pasturage may be such a use in certain circumstances. The Planning Commission should make a finding as to the acceptability or lack thereof in each specific instance and recommend accordingly. If horses are allowed, a determination should be made as to proximity to the shoreline or other water course for protection against fecal pollution. Should horses be allowed, fences are obviously necessary to protect the animals and the neighboring properties. The Planning Comnission should note that a variance is required to pasture horses and erect fences, but the variance may not be contrary to ordinance intent. Private easement platting, on site acceptability, legal document language or provisions necessary to implement policy are technical matters which should be determined by staff. ^A WJ ww Vft A A* AJ44A|^W m S«c^ I qua! tMt Cot half nlf4l 1 )io 4iro of i: TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Comission 6 Council Hank Miihich, Zoning Administrator October 13. 1977 Jaws Uwrence - ISSO Sixth Avenue N. SxWivision (Preliminary) o o The pioposed ro.4, iwe! Kr policT has h''" “ Sfch include the A park dedication fee of *250.00 per lot ««ld be fO«hc-in» <V« »PP««1 » final i^at. The area is beauUMly »oded but quite hilly. ____ • M^eSS District. A P^lic Hearing has been scheduled for Nove*er 7. 1077 at 7:.S p... PU.q.H« OPWISSION .BTIHG . Noverb^ 7, 1077 Mr. Iterfurth presented Tr^ic togineer. Watershed District reviewed conirainication from Hennep^ -nTieared to relate to wetlands, dra^age md StstlS rrSk“'p?^tnr«tS: S addressed width of Tot 1 and wtdth of proposed access road. Instructed Mr. llerfurth obtain additional ®”^^”^s^i^^l^tions of dry buildable creek and drainage ‘"®lir"ug?eltrf*revising access width to 60 ft. a^areas of each projected lot. .'viso -uj,b _ meetine necessary 87,120 sq. tt. JSTl Sidth « 200 ft. ‘^'’Sr^plinTSted in City Engineer’sarea. Mso requested a grading and drainage pian report. Tabled proposal until necessary data is submitted. STAFF - N’ovcni>er 14, 1977 Letter to •..•.tershed District requesting additional directly regarding existing ««k t JAk H5i LON Tr n« (•eti • fr ••t I Coon* •ir I Ir^. hart Lr^ct r tM Janes Lavorence - 15S0 Sixth Avenue N. Subdivision (Preliminary) Page 2 w o: J) PLANNING COWISSIQN MEETING - Novenfcer 21, 1977 Mr. Lawrence and Mr. Herfurth were present. Discussed drainage plans and 50 ft. road width as shown on preliminary plat. Several Coiiinission meirbers indicated preference of 60 ft. road width to comply with our policy on roads exceeding 500 ft. in length. Planning Cemnission recennended approval of preliminary plat subject to ^e following conditions: (1) (2) (3) Approval of drainage plans by City Engineer. Approval of easements by City Engineer. Providing 30 ft. ^ -v; easement along creek route (15 ft. to either side from (4) (5) (6) (7) center of cree^ Approval of prop^ grades and drainage plans by Watershed District. Council approval oi' 50 ft. access width (discuss^ policy vs. ordinance require­ ments). Locatim of cul-de-sac as revised (further from creek and natural drainage). Completion and recording of Doug Dayton's proposed division. (8) Park Dedication Fee. (9) Title q>inion addressed to the City and approved by City Attorney. COUNCIL fCETING - November 28, 1977 Presented Planning Comnission reconnendations and new letter of drainage, soils and slopM review by Greg Frank, of M^nbs-I^utson, dated 11-28-77. Stated that Planning Coemission was unaware of the engineer's connents when their action was made. Road to be private outlet. Requested soil evaluation by Hennepin Cointy Soil Conversation District and on-site evaluation by applicant's engineer. Tabled to meeting of Decenber 12, 1977 pending information. ' » i-- •• STAFF - Noveaber 29, 1977 Coincil has referred this proposal back to the Planning Comnission for reconsideration. The City Engineer report (copy enclosed) indicates some possible problems. I contacted Gordy Coffin for several additional copies of the proposed subdivision so I can forward a copy to the Heni^in County Soil 8 Water Conservation District for a soil map and report. I'm including this item on the agenda as an action item if reports are received in time for Planning Comnission review and recoranendation. PLANNING COMMISSION - December 5, 1977 Reports and Information requested not submitted by applicant. Vithoxit this Infomatlon no determination could be made. Issue returned to Council without recommendation. -I Trmci I Eat etIoD 76 ■rUri d. »t qiiarU w itfl r of Iff •rolgr co. Mi tUt«} Ihm sUt« Janes Lavrence - 1550 Sixth Avenue N. Subdivision (Preliminary) Page 3 STAFF - December 9, 1977 Receipt of ovner's engineering report and soils report from Hennepin Soil and Uater Conservation District. STAFF - December 12, 1977 Very brief reviev of above information: Lot 1 - boring and perc'a uphill of house on 12^ slope - possible sldehiU seepage concern, bouse located on slope • major erosion concern no drlvevay Indicated flat area of lot is Glencoe loan critlceJ. lot factors indicate close reviev of this site Lot 2 - boring and perc's on 6 • 10$ slope very near to Glencoe* loan identification' Lot 3 boring and perc's on 20$ slope leading to creek and drainage easement • measures 6o feet between hoxise and easement; all sloping. water table above 7 feet indicates mound design perc rate imacceptable 120 npi. (mound does not alter pero rate) no access location indicated • requires eul'vert over creek and watershed approval. critical, lot factors indicate close re'vlev of this site Lot ^ •boring and perc's on T$ slope leading to creek • measures 8o feet betweeoi bouse and easement. water table above 7 feet indicates mound design no access indica'ted • requires eul'vert over creek to new cul-de-sac or to vest easement Lot 5 • OiV, Mutes Lot 6 U50 - lONG , Lot 7 Lot 8 existing house - perc's taken on slope of approximately k$ - ■very slow rate indicates saturated aoil near existing drain field area. This is also, theoretically, the better soils on this tract. boring and perc's on 10^ slope in Hamel loam, not Hayden aa listed in the Hickok letter. Very high water table indicates special mound design. boring and perc's on 10$ slope 'water table above T$ Indicates mound design no drlve'way indicated boring and perc's on 5)( slope - perc rate marginal 60 aq)l. - no drl'vevay Indicated, but 20^ slope between road and bouse. On all lots, only two perc tests taken, some marginal, others falling. Before construction, our ordinance requires at least 6 perc tests cmd a design layout respecting the slopes and shoving both a primary and an alternate site for each house. I suggest that more tborou^ In'vestlgation be done before approving Lota 1 and 3 due to the many problems apparent on these sites. : i 1 * 1 » n- .fi j OHWf MMeS f ffSO • 6 } ONG LAt •••rtptlOBI *• •"i Th9 tMl }3j tjoii ?6, m ■^ri dUVtn i ^mrUrf t ««jr M K^. •f Ws# Ccul wiir^ St •Uf«rria|( »• SUU 0/ I JAMES LAWRENCE - 1550 Sixth Avenue Nor Subdivision (Preliminary) Page 4 COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 12, 1977 ijf' O O Qir ^ The Council received and reviewed two new pieces of information: 1) A soils report by the Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District, and 2) a Soils report by Eugene Hlckok and Associates. There ensued a lengthy discussion concerning the findings of the two reports as they affected the suitability of each site for access, house location and septic system suitability. The Council approved the preliminary plat subject to the combination of Lots 3 and 4, 5 and 6, and to the combination of Lots 1 and 2 unless the owner can submit complete septic system site evaluation Information to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Council also Incorporated the Planning Commission'recommendations, a developer's agreement and a homeowner's agreement, all to be set forth in a resolution to be prepared for the next meeting. STAFF - January 5, 1978 The applicant's engineer Is reviewing septic locations on Lots 1 & 2 and may revise the lot line locations. The line between Lots 2 & 3 may be relocated to follow the creek. Consequently, the owner has asked that this Item not be on the agenda for January 9, 1978.w. COUNCIL • January 23, 1978 Reviewed new perc tests and 1/18/78 plat design. Approved resolution 'of preliminary approval, subject to lot line layout acceptable to zoning staff. STATE - January 30, 1978 Nr. Lawrence met with A1 Olson In the City office and agreed to rearrange the lot lines to a reasonable configuration. The boundary of Lot 3 will become the creek on all sides. The line between Lots 1 and 2 will be adjusted slightly around Lot 1 septic system. STAFF - February 6, 1978 Received latest lot line rearrangement acceptable to City staff. COUNCIL - February 9, 1978 Reviewed last lot line arrangement and reconfirmed preliminary approval with the lot lines as shown in the print dated 2/6/78, 2/9/78 as initialled by the mayor. Also received an engineering review from the City Engineer. u n u $• «<• Ut ft ha ■ll ] I 414•r I JAMES LAWRENCE - 1550 Sixth Avenue North Subdivision (Final Plat) Page 5 STAFF - March 21, 1978 The final plat (mylars and hardshells) for the Tanglewood (James Lawrence) Subdivision have been submitted for approval. The original preliminary was not approved. This proposal was delayed for quite some time. The original preliminary plat was not approved. A revised preliminary was required before approval was given to proceed with the final plat. Enclosed are copies of the original preliminary - the revised preliminary (as approved) and the final plat as submitted. I'm also enclosing copies of staff's progressive report on this subdivision proposal along with Council's resolution approving the preliminary plat. Note • several conditions listed in the resolution require certification of approval by the City Attorney and Engineer. A receipt of recording of the Doug Dayton Subdivision will also be required. The park dedication fee of $1250 shall be paid before final plat approval (6 lots at $250 per lot equals $1500 - less $250 paid with approval of Doug Dayton Division >■ $1250.00. 1 I JM 915 LOi I Citf 1 1 S#etr mMl Uioti. Cott Itair nir^; 1 h«i 4iT9i •r ti RESOLUTION NO. 866 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF JAMES LAWRENCE 1550 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision and septic system regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and *1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council have considered the application for a subdivision plat for James Lawrence; NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED, that based upon all of the information presented by the applicant and reports by the City staff, consultants and the Planning Connission, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for James Lawrence with the following changes and requirements and conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Drainage plans, easements, cul-de-sac location, erosion control and street gradients shall be approved by the City Engineer. Drainage plans and erosion control measures shall be approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Access shall be by a private road developed within a 50 ft. wide right-of-way with an underlying access easement dedicated to the City and with the location approved by the Hennepin County Public Works Department. The Douglas Dayton subdivision shall first be finally approved and a receipt of recording delivered to the City. The new division shall consist of 6 lots (Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 combined, 5 and 6 combined, 7 and 8 as showc nn the revised 11-30-77 proposal). Further combination of Lots 1 and 2 shall be required if the applicant fails to satisfy the City Engineer with satisfactory septic system site evaluation for said lots. The applicant shall execute a 30 ft. wide flowage and conservation easement along the existing Holy Name Creek. The applicant shall execute and deliver a road and utilities easement, a developers agreement, and a homeovmer's association agreement, articles of Incorporation and/or by-laws. ' I i . i u n FX :•% -f !' 1 I Mi its LOt 1 t 8«et r mi thiiii Cou ktif niRi; 1 he #|j^ •f U 9. 10. 11. The applicant shall provide a title opinion addressed to the City. The applicant shall pay a park dedication fee based upon the standard City schedule. The applicant shall agree to the requirements and conditions of this resolution and so signify by signing the resolution where provided. This resolution will expire on February 1, 1978 if the applicant has not signed his agreement by that date, and shall also expire on July 1, 1978 if the final plat drawing and above required Information have not been submitted to the City for final approval. In that event, it will be necessary for the applicant to file a new subdivision application with the City. Adopted this day of January 1978. / / ames Lawrence, owner William B. Van Nest, Mayor ATTEST: Walter Br; Benson, Clerk/Administrator COFFIN AND PLANNER MINNESOTA TANSLEU/oaO /^/A/Al >rlAT {hafpshb ^l) 5- >F~?rtoo UTILITY AND DRAINAGC EASEME SHOWN THUS » ** “ Afhf tf pANg Imt \ #/. Cov0f/ S*mh 0,Y IWINO 10.00 Feet in width and aojoinino UNFS AS SHOWN ON THt PLAT.H»* Coynfg Xiordt^ MOWJMEN T ARE ASSUMED N r I$4s.40 «__i M C j »*1 \/ • i! j VV W •» •« « v/^ *W- %m§ -« ly 41rvet suti«T^lBleni inrl that ] aa a duljr rar.li^tarad I«nii rurv**;cr vpr.»r lha law ,r .h. 5UU of wru--u _ _ Gordon £, Cofrin |io« GUb4 h TO:Planning Commission #359 FROM:Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator DATE: March 7, 1978 subject: wetlands Variance .‘15 MS. Buesgens is ’^®’"*“j"|J^^^“LriccMs*trLake Minnetonka. The tuSr«rp«prrtru"i:f S^ITock 1 the rarvie- Addition. The following exhibits are attached: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Sh?Mt'B*-ie%rrte”i;tter explaining hardships to property, beach deck# Suggested lack of information on plans. Req (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 2;^««’if?cs‘ii ei“«ion plans of bridge and deck indicating number location aiHof roo?rwi?h reference to lot lines f^“dtnrlptloi:‘’of J^“„“£UUng ‘wlth'toJo^an “Station, ofindicate any proposed grading and filling wrt S«ci?l ™o/er/er:ttgrd and reason of erection supports .5 i TO:Planning Comnlsslon FROM:A. P. Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator DATE:March 21, 1978 SUBJECT: 1978 Marina License Applications NOTICE The City Council has directed that the 1978 Marina License Applications be reviewed by the Marina Committee and that recommendations be returned to the Council by April 1, 1978. The Marina Committee must schedule a meeting this week, which meeting must be publicized with notice given to the marina owners and the press. i; < » « TO:Hank F. Nuhich, Zoning Administrator FROM:A. P. Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator DATE: February 27, 1978 SUBJECT: Marina Committee Please advise the Planning Commission that the marina committee must schedule meetings to review the 1978 applications. Norm Paurus is the Council member of the committee. On February 23, 1978, the Council referred the following to the conmiittee: Windward Marine Stubbs Bay Marina North Shore Drive Marina North Star Marina North Shore Union '76 Foxhill Homeowner's Assoc. Joint Use Dock (referred because application shows increase in 2 slips over previous authorization) The Council set a deadline of April 1, 1978 for the comnittee to return reconmendations to the Council. The Council approved the Joint use licenses for the Minnetonka Power Squadron and Wayzata Yacht Club. The City has not yet received applications from Paul's Landing, Gayle's Marina or Minnetonka Boat Works. PLANNING COMMISSION - February 27, 1978 The Zoning Administrator explained the issue to the Coinnission. The Chair called for volunteers to serve on the marina committee. JoEllen Hurr and Tom Frahm voltuiteered to serve on said comnittee. The Zoning Administrator suggested he would contact Councilman Paurus to arrange a meeting of the committee after applications and material are properly prepared and collated. 1 i ‘ - - - - TO;Council FROM:A. P* Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator DATE:February 15, 1978 SUBJECT: 1978 Marina License Applications I. II. Commercial Marinas. As of this date, 5 of the 8 commercial marinas have returned their 1978 applications. We have no application from Gayle's nor from Minnetonka Boat Works. An Incomplete application from Paul's Landing was received and returned to him for additional Information on January 5, 1978. I recommend that these 5 applications be referred to the Planning Commission for review by the marina committee.with Instructions for a reasonable deadline for Planning Commission recommendations. I suggest May 8 as a final date. Joint Use Docks. All three of the annual joint use applications have been returned to the City and are attached for your review. Vayzata Yacht Club - no permanent mooring - 200 ft. dock plus 5 off shore bouys and swlmnlng area (note low Insurance on line 8). Minnetonka Power Squadron - no permanent mooring - 20 day use slips along shore. Foxhlll Association - 13 permanent moorings - (11 slips, 1 lift, 1 bouy), 96 ft. dock - previous year's license acknowledged only the 11 slips (in the same dock layout) even thou^ the lift and bouy were actually there. You may wish to consider approval of the joint use docks now, or you may wish the marina committee to review these also. COUNCIL - February 23, 1978 Referred commercial marina applications to Marina Comnlttee with deadline for recommendations back to Council of April 1, 1978. Also referred Foxhlll homeowner's association application for study of slip numbers. Previous licenses were for 11 slips only even though the lift and buoy have been there for at least one season. / TO: FROM: DATE: Henry F. Muhich, Zoning Administrator A. P. Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator March 16, 1978 SUBJECT: Stubbs Bay Marina The attached letter received from the DNR requests City action or response before April 9, 1978 concerning revision of the dock layout and dredging application pending before the City and the DNR, The issue Is whether or not the City would <:onsider rezoning a small portion of the adjacent residential area to facilitate dock rearrangement in lieu of dredging or whether dredging will be permitted at all regardless of resulting dock layout. The proposed layout is similar to one submitted a letter from Mr. McCleary's attorney, received 12-22-77. The Planning Commission last reviewed the dredging application on 8-15-77, STAFF - March 21, 1978 This item should be addressed by the Planning Commission on March 27, 1978 and will be on the Council agenda for March 30. J1 M STATE Of JEN! (^fl as® IT A ^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Metro Region Headquarters, Division of Waters 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 March 9, 1978 o)i?®igi(Krs MAR 14 237S Mr. A. P. Olson Assistant Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 VILUGE OS ORONO RE: P.A. 78-6032, Stubbs Bay Marina Dear Mr. Olson: The DNR is contemplating final action of the permit application for dredging at Stubbs Bay Marina. However, a recent discussion with Mr. James McCleary, owner of the marina, revealed a possible alternative to dredging. A small parcel of land on the north side of the site is riparian to Lake Minnetonka and is zoned residential. The parcel is owned by Mr. McCleary and is adjacent to the marina property. We have a sketch of the marina site with a proposed dock layout that can accomBK>date the presently licensed number of slips. The access to these dock slips would have to be from the parcel presently zoned residential. It is important to note that this alternative would eliminate dredging along the shoreline, with a possible exception for a launching ramp. this Alternative were to be implemented, it will be necessary for Mr. McCleary to submit a petition for rezoning of the small residential parcel. Because a rezoning of this parcel will alleviate many of the concerns of the City and DNR with regard to impacts on Lake Minnetonka, I am asking for your comments and review of the attached plan. If the City has no major objections to the alternative proposed, I will recom­ mend to Mr. McCleary that he make formal application to the City for rezoning, a prerequisite for permit issuance. If, on the other hand, there are relevant objections to a rezoning, I an asking the City to make a final decision on the dredging proposal as originally submitted. The DNR will make a final decision with or without the City's input if we do not receive some feedback in the next 30 days. AOMINISTRATtVI StIVICtS • WATfRS, SOUS. AND MINiRAlS • LANDS AND FORISTIV CAMI AND FISH • FAIRS AND liCIIATION • tNFORCIMINT AND FIIID StIVICi : ! 1 < ; ! Mr. A. P. Olson March 9, 1978 Page 2 If you have any further questions on this natter, please do not hesitate to contact me or Mike Mueller of ny staff at 296-7523. Yours truly. I maid IT. Hama( Regional Hydrologist RH:ls Attachnents cc: J. McCleary J. Holnquist i !ni ♦ 9 1 1"fnMH n ^1 ^||*^ ^H m 1^«% <A 5? ^ • •% >• 0 *• '*^ w •aItuNa •?« « . J » 1 I. i i Ttlvphonc 473-7367 CITYofORONO Pott OfTicc Bob 66*CrysUl Bay. MinneaoU 6^23 • Munidpa) Office* On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka March 21, 1978 Mr. James McCleary 1233 Trailwood Drive Hopkins, MN 55343 RE: Stubbs Bay Marina Mr. McCleary, This letter is to advise you that the Orono Planning Commission will address your proposed dock layout revision at their meeting on March 27, 1978 and the City Council will address the matter at their meeting on March 30, 1978. Sincerely, Asst« Zoning Administrator AP0:sm Enclosures cc: Henry F. Nuhich, Zoning Administrator 1 Telephone 473-7357 CITY of ORONO Poet Onioe Box 66*CrysUl Bey, Minnreote 55323*Municipal Officee On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka March 21, 1978 Mr. Ronald Harnack Regional Hydrologist MN DNR Division of Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 RE: Stubbs Bay Marina Mr. Hamack, This letter is in response to your letter of March 9, 1978 concerning a proposed dock layout revision, rezoning and/or dredging. The City of Orono briefly reviewed the proposal last fall, but has not yet responded because the applicant has not pursued the matter and the 1978 marina license review has not been conq>leted. Indeed, the 1978 Stubbs Bay License application received 1-11-78 did not Include any prpposed dock layout. This matter will be conceptually reviewed by the City Council at their March 30, 1978 meeting and the City expects to have all marina licenses reviewed shortly thereafter. Consequently, we request an extention of the 30 day response period indicated in your letter so that all matters will be adeqiiately reviewed. Sincerely, City Planner AP0:sm cc:James McCleary Henry F. Muhich, Zoning Administrator Walter R, Benson, City Administrator jeMli imu itwattmuouiiai. TO:Council FROM:A. P. Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator DATC:Novcirber 1, 1977 SUBJECT:Forest Arms Subdivision Carol Sue Dongoske L This s^division was approved by Council on February 23, 1970, and has been recorded accordingly. No lots have ever been sold or developed except Lot 8, Block 2, and the propos^ extension of Forest Arms Lane was never improv^. The original approval was subject to a performance bond for the street improvements and no construction on Lot 5 until it was serviced by sewer. All lots were serviced with the 73-1 sewer project which became operable in Nbvemi^r of 1975. All lots meet the current 1 acre lot area, 140 ft. lot width requirements except Lot 5, Block 1, which is short area. expense Mrs. Dongoske now desires to complete the road at the developer's^and offer the lots for sale. She is requesting Council to authorize the road and drainage ijTq>rovemmits according to the original plat approval. I suggest Council consider the following: 1. Consider the ijiplications of public street acceptance concerning current policy. The road is a logical extension of the existing publicly maintained portion. 2. Have the City fiigineer review the proposed design specifications for road and drainage improvements. 3. Require a developer's agreement and performance bond; amouit ISOt of expected cost. 4. Note that current ordinance requires a park dedication fee at time of platting or development; amount 101 of land value ($6,400-$9,400 - $640-$940 per lot). The developer may wish to prepay this now. 5. Note that lot 5, Block a, requires a variance for lot area prior to any construction. 6. Note that Block 2 abutts an existing ditch that has previously been dredged. Riparian access will likely be requested ajnd dredging policy should be restated. CIL ^CE^1NG - November 14, 1977 Conceptually approved items 1-4. Directed Staff to receive payment of park fees, to receive a developer's agreement for the road and drainage including a ISOt performance bond, and to review the develc^r's engineering desig^i upon sii>mission. Referred item #6 to Planning COmission for review of riparian ri^ts, conservation easements, etc. Will review PC commoits and City engineer's review of constmction spec's, before confirming item 11. Directed staff to have the Hennepin ^il and Water Conservation Service review the wetlands area. For6st Anns Subdivision Page 2 STAFF - Novenber 16, 1977 yf Q o ,f» This packet w forward^ to me by A1 on Novenber 15, 1977, following the last Council meeting. This s^ivision was approved subject to several cmiditicms several years con^tiow were not met at the time, so the development has been at a stand­still rince that time. fr submitted the request to proceed with development. The proposal went to Council. Council revia<red the'proposai and a^re^d all issues'noted ras cmcemed with the marsh area and previ drS*^rlghts *** “®**^<* address the issues of wetlands, riparian ri^ts, dredging. fiiclM^ is a of the plat from our section maps as the applicant has not provided wSriS^for *" PLANNING (XMdSSION WORK SESSION - Novenber 21, 1977 Review^ plat as previously approved. Discussed wetlands and riparian issue as j request copies of plat, dredging docunentation and that might be necessary to review the riparian status of the individual parcels. regards to determination of length of ^reline. u* of the Comssion menbers indicated interpretation of shoreline to include shoreline of channel if dredging was legal. I STAFF - March 21, 1978 ,1 "i Sue Dongoske has requested an appearance before the Council to discuss tterns concerning the completion of this plat. On Novenber lA, 1977. the CoTOcil referred the item to the Planning Conmission for recom- mendatiras concerning 6 items. On November 21, 1977, the Planning Conmission requested additional information as listed in Mr. Muhich's letter of November 22. 1977. No information was received by the City until March 6, Bf78. Regarding M. Dongoske's letter and the previous action, I recommend the following: 1.Building permits should not be Issued until the road is Installed tod passible. If permits are considered, no permit should be developer's agreement Is completed and no occupancy should be allowed until the road is certified complete by the*^ ^ City Engineer.- No permits should be Issued until the Planning Conmission has had a chance to review all pertinent Information and make recommendations to the Council as directed on November 14, 1 M rI' Forest Arms Subdivision Page 3 2.The Planning Commission should be directed to complete their study of the matter» Including the newly defined Issue of boat dockage In the channel. The applicant should be reminded that reviews cannot be completed until all necessary Information Is supplied. In particular, the City has no road construction plans for the Engineer to review, has no dock plans or suggested layouts for the Planning Commission to review, has no title opinion or other evidence of any lot restrictions or covenants on the property and has only poor copies of the plat and DNR channel permit from which to work. 3. A developer's agreement and bond should be required prior to any final approval. 4. Park dedication fees should be paid as should all delinquent taxes. 5. Conservation easements, variances, drainage requirements and dockage rights should be Investigated by the Planning Comnlsslon. ♦ I i. 4- 4 ■0 * t ; _ , ... •.^ ... ^•rant n % « w • •H MEETING OF THE OHUNO cuo.,v-x.., ■ /Lngoske now desires to complete the road at y(*-deve?oper-s -Pf"®tfLtSorize ' • /Srio.r:nd%»?ra|“lSprrements according to the original plat approval. SUBDIVISION Forest Arms (Continued) I suggest Council consider the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. consider the inplications P^“° ®*^‘?he publicly the proposed“din,rsp^^l?i«rionrtrr''ii:dand‘'drainage |,-Srrr."Xieloper;s ag^ rte’^t“furiln't o;a!nLce.re^lres^e parh dedication fee ®^^^To^°of^land vlluedevelopment? amount » lot). The ($6p400-$9,400 = $640 $940 P developer may ^^requires a variance Note that Lot Sj^Block 1, construction. reguested and dredging policy should be restated. #336 j council Meeting - Hovesiber 14, 1911 refer Mayor Van Nest ‘i?™®Se^reqMst^tot a°sub- S!vSU^r^S?o5‘^“-“oS*e.%2rest hrm. Sub- division, to review: ■; »STS.af- 4 Conservation easements 5* Drainage improvements 6. Required variances Motion, Aye. (4) - Hays (0). Butler moved, **A®®®”^*^?,,ffrt^nequiring Removal»!!1'A^^?iTi°tSii: ?SrRi?ht-Of_ wa:Resolution #854 p A eso Right-Of Of Private Encroachments Witnxn _ ^ Sf Minnetonka Avenue. Motion, Ayes >ai 4l I /M-77 f resolution #854 Minneton)ca Avenue f « • ••• ••••••• - - - - ^ M J VILLAGE OF ORONO Secular Meetlnc of the Village Council. February 23, 1970 * Th* Village Council net on the above date Mth the following members present: Mayor ^erha^er, Coimcilnen Butterfield, Franzel. McCarthy, and Searles. * rr«mc*. Searles moved, McCarthy seconded, that the Regular Meeting of February 9, 1970^/be approved! Motion, Ayes (S) . A Searles noved, McCarthy seconded, that the Minutes of the Special ffeeting of February 16. 1970, be approved. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Franzel moved, McCarthy seconded, that the request of Mrs. John Wells, 2000 Sh^yi^ood Road, for a variance in side yard setback fM 10* to 3* and front yar.d setback from 30» to 15*, be approved. Motion, Ayes (5} Nays (0). Searles noved, Franzel seconded, that the final plat for Robert Dongoske, Forest Arms, subject to posting a perfor^iance bond and no building on Lot 5 until the Municipal sewer is in to connect to, be approved. Motion, Ayes (S) - Nays (0). Searles moved, McCarthy seconded, that the request of Floyd Lasher, 2625 North Shore Drive, for a division and rearrangement of two lots, be approved. Motion, Ayes (5) Nays (0). * m Butterfield noved, Searles seconded, that the request of Edgar Cox for a division and rearrangement of lots at 2130 Shadywood Road, be approved. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) Searles moved, McCarthy seconded, that 'rdinance No. 112, An Ordinance To Amend Chapter 9, Section 9.020 And Section 9.030 Ot The Munic^al Code Of Orono To Increase 1 7:30 P.H. MINUTES February 9, 1970 MINUTES February 16, 1970 VARIANCE 2000 Shadywood Road final PLAT Forest Arms DIVISION 2625 North Shore Drive DIVISION 2130 Shadywood Road ORDINANCE NO. 112 r. • J ry'■HUiM —.| I n I \ 4 ' f i* Trirphone 473-7367 CITYof ORONO Post Office Box G6«CrytU) Bay, MinncooU 55323 • Municipal OfRcui ii On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 31, 1977 Mr. Greg Frank McCoirbs-I&iutson Associates 12805 Olson Mcrorial Highway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 Re: #336 - Forest Arms Subdivision Carol Sue Dongoske Greg: ?tete attached memo and review for your information. I expect Council to discuss this at their Noveirber 14, 1977 meeting. You may wish to have reviewed the site prior to that time for access, road spec's and drainage considerations. Sincerely, A. P. Olsm Asst. Zoning Administrator APO: be cc: John Geihardson, Public Works Director Enclosure: Memo #336 Plat Map Secti(Hi V... \ 7 • •%j f >• ^ ' t > *»•• #. r\ t • < .A if JV___ y Q - M to* » !P ^ A • < u ■ « U.j' •" . y r ■ sv a j Pcicr Flint Herfiuth 1 R63l Estotc, Inc. Corporal* Oftico • 740 East Lak* Straol • Wayiat*. Minttaaol* . 55301 . 612/473-4646 | Wftyzatft Mlnn«(onka Edina Northaaat Downtcwn MinnaapoMi Watt BloominQtoa October 26, 1977 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Orono Village Hall 335 South Brown Road Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 ,GCi ^I Iw 1 t YJll^iGc OF CROWa Gentlemen: ! I wish to be scheduled on the next Planning Commission Agenda in order to discuss the development of Forest Arms (subdivision) in Orono. The owners wish to market the property and I am representing them as sales agent. Forest Arms was approved by Orono several years ago and is duly recorded. A road was built, as shown on Plat. Sanitary sewer was put in the roadbed. The owner will complete the road. 1 We need to be advised of any and all requirements to be met so that build­ ing permits on the Individual lots will be awarded. The following points should be clarified: 1. Requirements to compIei.e road and have Orono accept the road and maintain thereafter. 2. Storm sewers required. 3. Park dedication fees. 4. Any lot variances required. 5. Deed restrictions, covenants, etc. ^ \ 6. Other. — nr-iLcru £ /f 7^ (. ~ D oo Kpn'y', With regards. Carol Sue Dongoske / FOX-HERFURTH REAL ESTATE, INC. cc:Henry Muhlch Orono Village Council Greg Frank at McCombs & Knutson Fischer Construction CSD/do I.I . t : t Pefcr Flint Heraulh R63l EStStCi Inc. Corpor«t« Office • 740 E«tt L«k» Slr««t •WtyttU. MInnesott • 55301 • 612/473-4646 WayiAlo Minntlonka Etfina Northeast Downtown Minneapollf Wait Bloomington March 3, 197a Members of the Council City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 6 J978 VILLAGE 08 OfiOt^Q Members of the Councili On October 26, 1977, 1 sent a letter to you regarding the Forest Arms property in Orono, (See attached Exhibit #1), I was advised in a letter dated November 22, 1977 (see attached «2) that the Planning Comnission and Council would be studying the matter. » t “■'I VJ 1 since that time, the property has been resurveyed and staked by Gordon Coffin (see plat - attached #3).i _ ; r . At the advice of Henry Muhlch, Zoning Administrator, I have obtained a copy of the DNR dredging permit, dated April 26, 1966 (see attached f4). I have obtained a copy of the minutes of Council, dated February 23, 19^, citing final approval of the plat, (sec attached tS).< . IV. >1 The owners of the property, Matthias and Raymond Fischer, intend to complete the continuation of Forest Arms Lane as per city and engineering require­ ments. At Mr. Muhlch's advice, 1 have obtained copies of the position of sanitary sewer in place in the roadbed as shown on the plat, (see attached •6). • ^ P . f i > A At this point, we understand the plat has been approved by Orono subject * to building of the road (Forest Arms Lane). He understand the lots with channel lakeshere have riparian rights (the DNR permit specifies "naviga­ tional purposes") He tinderst«u>d there will be a park dedication fee assessed each lot. He ue atnure there are assessments remaining on each lot for sanitary sewer is^rovements. He understand there have been %retlands areas designated and that there are restrictions regarding those areas. V Hould you clarify the following points, please? 1. Hhat more needs to be done before a building permit will be Issued a buyer of one of these lots? 2. Hill the buyer of a lot with channel frontage be able to erect a dock and moor a boat in front of his hom^^^ • ^ *X- -i i. Members of the Council Page 2 March 3> 1978 3.What easements, drainage ways and other conditions (refer to letter - attached «2 - points 6, 7, 8) have been determined by the Planning Commission and the Council? The owners and X viould appreciate your prompt action in this matter so we can proceed with sale of the properties in the correct manner. With regards, 'Sue Dongosk^ FOX-HPRFURTH REAL ESTATE, INC. CSDt^l'me enclosures cct Matthias t Raymond Fischer Henry Muhlcb J w a ' 0 t 0 'O A Ar .• « • ' »• n»n^ >?• * • > » 4r • f V ■-•I• .• - I •\•i • • i •■ ^ - • 1. *4 >. «« ^ »<r ■* * .1 • • .. >' * fi ^ • •• r • •.*» • J • *# •• • % . • t • f ^•r t • • ReM Estate. Inc CofporAt# Office • 740 Eat! Ltk# Sfrtot • WayiatA, Minnaaott • 5ft9t1 • eif/47a-404a 4 WayiiifW Minnatooica Edina Northaaat Downtown UInnaapolla Wat! llootHnotoa K *-• t • •. Octp^^f 26, 1977.^ • - - *. u OBO^'.jPLAimiNG COMMISSION Orotto. Village Hall 335 .^uth Browa Road Crys^ Bay. Mn. 55323 ! 3) • • ' Ct. *«# Genti • ••r I * .4 V « •: ^<-V. * • • W 7 wlah to be acheduled on thci next Planning Coonnlsslon Agenda In order to dlscuaa the developnent of Forest Arm* (subdivision) In Orono. The owners wish to aarket the property and I an fepresentlng thea as sales'agent. [ r s • Forest Amo was approved by Orono several years ago and la duly recorded. A road waa built, as sho^ on Plat. Sanitary sewer was put in the roadbed. The owner will coaplete the road.*b .r 11 • Wb nee^ to be advised of any and all rsbulreaeii£s to be set so thi|t hnlld- 4s Aoj lot Torlonceo required# ^ ^ 5s Deed reetrlctloUt covenenteg etc. 'vv . .is Others > 1 • ^.• » mth xsgards. 'A Vf ^ r . V' !Vt « » » V#,,r .!•s 1 » Carol Sue Dongoske FOX-HBRFURTH REAL ESTATE, INC. \ • a* • • IT A ' .* *r .• V • 1 cc: Henry Mihlch Orono Village Council . Greg Frank at McCond>s & Knutson Fischer Constrwctlon ■ » • > • CSD/do • F • .- • • •< « niF« .> V '» . Sk.* V : i ' >•: ! *»<r • . u ^ •• * ‘ *.-* * « r • •.1 • f f rttU, Minn«»ola . S»9M . 0i>/4?s-4«4« »«n Ulon*apoila . Waat Itoomlnatea § V .. .V ^ 1 - >n Agenda In order to in-Orono. H»e ownera ® Bales'agent. f • » nd is duly recorded. 'St put in the roadbed. • I be net so th^t build- Ihu fo}.lowlng points . ^ - ; •'vv'V f v 5 -'^ 'cept the pond ^ ' ./ H ^ •» . %{ i r < Ha? • I * # .V •' L 1 ' *■ » . • • X* ■ ^ \ ■ J.? •’■4‘vr -V- ■• . -S ^ * ^wrRH-07' .'*aa£m, \: .^ a\ ? H. A . a • 7 ^ Wm w wm ^ JiA m0bana47S>7a»T CITYof O^ONO mRQNO' ^ b • • • • • ft > c ; ()n the North Shpre of Lake Minnetonka .■ Noveni^^ 22, 1977 / • * Sue Dongg»s1i» Fox Herfurth Real Estate, Inc. 730 East Lake Street VayzaU, W ^ 5S391 ' • ,i Dear Ms. Dongoske: U ** The Planning Conmissian and Couicil are status of tnp •■• ^ •• \eT • .vr- •?•■• V . • Forest Am Plat which you in the process of reviewing th*' now considering for develepoent. In reviewing tiw previously approved plat7 we find several issues which i(tre never addressed at the-' tine the proposal ^oihdif r • . • a a * ^• •*. - 'r• *.• ■ ’ V- i i •7 @ * P.. .V • • •• • • • J / * * ♦.: * •' • ' /■■; ’• « • #•* % '/*•. ' • -U < a * s • 1 »* • ; V; . ' ’■* •* 1 ^ 'Vv .*•. % ' « * •. • b • • yx:: ' P'\ *•» f was originally submitted. The ^fvelopM or applicant will be required to provide thp fplle^ing additional aaterial fw the pui^sa of reviewing the proposal. 7 • ‘ ■ . . **?•-*"-*'• * M,c4>ida of final plat (includes lot and shoreline dlflHmloi6.''nreai' and wtltnda designation) . 1 yz. One CDw of D.N.R. dredging permit The.current park dedicat .... ✓5. Special assessments will ad^esfed 6. Basenents as required 7. ' Dr^mgeways dging permit • >--<-|^:V v ^ ' ‘ TMuIred to assure conplianca - if -i '. ,;v/ ' \v»v/ ation fw schedule will be addressed • *' 8. Other conations as i'.*termlned by the Planning Coenission and Council , >>7jf yw have,my questions, please feel;free to cai m ■ 5;'> f>:: Henry P. Mdiich a ^ Henry Zoning Adhdnistretor • •- • . * •/I ' HM: » . t * '4 \r^ .:a V V • rV ^ • •s 7-'^ • ' ■''Vv. ■* ' K'/ < •* • Ir ^ t % ,:7-rr-r7-v4 • % ■ ^ I* *. 2. • • r • S. T«l«>^aM 47«4»^ Ypir OitoNO ly, *|f«;iWp«l Ottd^ ; - nkk \.- ' • * # #• 4arloi cov*4, Prensal tec^odad, that th« final plat for Robert Cone*ok#. Foreat ArviS, stbjoct to posting a p3rf!>r%ar.c# bond r.nd no buildlnc oa lot I until th# Municipal sower is In to connect to, be approrod. Motion, Ares (5) • Bays (0), FINAL PLAT Forest Arcs .LL O O q 3o • • ;* -4- ;K. • -'• i »f reviewing the for devolopoont. Issues which wore Kitted. > s • *•. a t • •w • : ^ Ebllb^ing additional .1:-t. • v«rr * *?/ • 'I dlamsien^,'areai; ..' •• v-'vv.: Idrassad • i * . •' * . . • ‘ V . i-'K'iKr lission and Council .• ■. • S;>VI ^ * • . * • • *■ ‘ (..dy • . X ■!*, ^ . *• ^ t • * ■ • •• «• :,Y -■.■U r>i . •.. •%»*• > ■> ' r STATE OF MINNESOTA J COUNTY OP HENNEPIN ) ss ) . VILLAGE OF ORONO ) • o. • • • I, Ralph H. Martin, Village Clerk of the Village of Orono, do hereby certify that the fore-going excerpts of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Eehxuaxixt—23/ in. Villa*ge Council of’the Village of Orono nave been" compared with the original record, and the same is a true and correct copy of said original record and was duly adopted by said Village Councij at said ,Meeting. In Witness Whereof I have .hereunto set ny hand and seal this ^ lath day of p^hi-n.^y _tn_ _ _ _ _ artln. Clerk-Adnlnistratx (SEAL) final put Forest Ann -//- ^ O /T 7T O t ge Clerk of the Village of »re-going excerpts of the 7ft of tiiO Nave been~compared withroao I a true and correct copy of iopted by said Village Counci hereunto set my hand and iUSM // __ H^^artln/ Clerk>Adminlstrat4 •* FOHtSI ’ f r '• • SCAL£ #• a i ^t9t9 •A /;• eouffrr ill______vvav; ^40 > ^-=7 i /wf# #r* p i*sa . I t .:S ±0M LfKC, mmesor^ .■ * •; \ / r k-" ;• •■' '! I \ f >' i r.V, .. y. •■ N> I • ^ %n.» vf 7^•:t* iV V # • V • ft • F« / ■«.-v -•■•'.f • A I \ u. r. !• *• *■ V sM vr ^%r '4%» :/#• t . • »• • \ ■7i ':-./^ N \ v4 *V V 1 S • » \ \\ 1 ■\ •• -s. \ / V It4*/ /W *<^e -.a* X X N ft-" / >*.. ’•.> "*V‘ * *• /***♦] *?. > * •*.#•• • f r • ' ftiftft • ’ ' Mu»tf*r€ ^ •* \ v\ .‘f‘' / •V^-. ..>,.f^W« '%*• r* A' ♦ ■ **»•-- a ft —4ft a. - Vv • - •.•: V F ^ / f0C^fh$r* *7 •• • Or—I't 5M»-«y/ ft* tfyi^sf #Ar^//W* o5. io4# » i- ^r,»,, «, ----* • ■ *-------' aV 1 < ______ I *.' '* .• '■*; j' vk^^-' ■"““ “ISl »«!v%r£t 3ffi^SL4sS^!-fe;rsw=,^» ^u. c:^ t. * I ». k* _ r trirjr'-v ^^.‘i;!l 1 ‘LTi:i' rf^ ^ i < ’**.‘'.!: 3fc^.-; I - T^V.?.'mM Iiri;v'S* !U2fl S??L?f^-^-rTrt« !t;»*»j}«* »?-•«!ii MT-nr ii m ’ : r ^ '-X.; • ■ -i ' ■ ■ . JOE WHITNETlj - 780 Old Crystal Bay Road South Subdivision (Planned Residential Development) r Sketch Pi Page 2 Pt^NNING SOMMISSION (Sketch Plan Review) - March 0 li" *1978 Planning Commission reviewed proposal. Two alternates were submitted (P.R.D. and preliminary plat). Developer requested some direction as to what design the Commission might prefer. He Indicated a desire to utilize the existing road as an access to the other proposed building sites. The Planning Commission made several suggestions Including moving Che access road to simplify platting of the property. The Commission did not indicate any great objection to the P.R.D. proposal. They did, however, suggest eliminating one building site for lack of dry bulldable area reduced by Che area of the access road. The Planning Commission also suggested the developer Investigate current and projected use of existing utility easement over Lots 7 and 8. Also requested survey Indicating location of existing structures with reference to existing and proposed lot lines. Also suggested developer submit perc tests and location of primary and alternate dralnflelds for adequate septic facility for each lot. Applicant to prepare revised plans and submit for Planning Commission sketch plan review. STAFF • March 20, 1978 The developer has submitted revised proposal (Exhibit G). A copy is enclosed for sketch plan review at the next scheduled,Planning Commission meeting. n Sllltl' iMlI attuta&uBEJ TO: FROM: Planning Commission Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator ^302 DATE:March 17, 1978 SUBJECT: Russ Johnson - 3508 Lyric Avenue Variance - Lot Area Width and Side Setback The Johnsons are requesting permission to add to an existing non~conforming residence. The proposal as submitted indicates no encroachment of required setbacks or reduction of any other existing non-conforming setbacks. The permit could probably be issued without first obtaining a variance. The addition would not exceed 50Z of the value. I am, however, somewhat concerned about issuing a permit without first obtaining a variance. A second story addition located only 12 ft. from the existing single story residence to the east might impose a hardship to this neighbor. I've requested some direction from the Administrator, but he too Is apparently skeptical. I'm enclosing a copy of my memo to Mr. Benson which explains the proposal as submitted rather than duplicate. Russ Johnson - 3508 Lyric Avenue Variance - Lot Area & Width & Side Setback Li^3 Page 2 m O a * 7. Exhibit G - East view of house as proposed 8. Exhibit H •* Upstairs bedroom floor plan above proposed garage addition # V’Oi I i i&l ^ i TO: FROM; DATE: Walter R. Benson, City Administrator Hank liuhich. Zoning Administrator March 6, 1978 j-f, <n> ^ oft- d) o d SUBJECT: Russ Johnson - 3508 Lyric Avenue Variance - Lot Area & Width & Side Setback Dick, I would like some direction on this application. The Johnsons are requesting a permit to expand and remodel their existing residence at the above location. Their lot is only 50 ft. wide with an area of approximately 6,723 sq. ft. The property is located in an LR-IC zoning district with a required lot width of 100 ft. and an area of 21,780 sq. ft. The existing house is currently located 4.1 ft. fi^oni the west property line and 11.6 feet from the east property line. The Johnsons are requesting approval to square off the void northwest corner of the residence for additional room, 'fhey would maintain the existing setback of 4.1 feet from the west property line. The expansion and remodeling on the east side of the house would consist of removing the existing attached garage and replace this with a new tuck-under garage at the same elevation. The front of the proposed garage would be in line with the front of the existing dwelling. The proposed addition would set back 10 ft. from the east property line. Above the proposed garage the Johnsons are requesting approval of 2 second story bedrooms and one bathroom. This addition would be setback a minimum of 10 ft. from the east property line. • We recently adopted the policy of not requiring variances for proposed additions that do not encroach on existing setbacks even if the setbacks and lot requirements are non-conforming. I'm still somewhat vague about this policy, however. Some of these proposals might result in problems to the City. I wouldn't want to be responsible without first consulting you. I'm enclosing a copy of the complete packet of material as submitted when the application was made. I am requesting some direction before making any commitments. The following exhibits are enclosed: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Exhibit A - Variance application form Exhibit B - Plat map Indicating site location Exhibit C - Site plan on survey indicating lot dimensions, existing and proposed setbacks and projected additions marked in red Exhibit D - Property owners list (neighbors) Exhibit E - Front view of house as proposed Exhibit F - West view of house as proposed 1 c m Or Coruiitional 0? PkOj'c ^^L (or prop^^rLy) f i" yij’J AcWress t^_ LC'^al J^-'S^ripticoi y_at^ ^ /JoVuCft, lk\^nT APPLIfAVr - ^uy-g-W £u ^€a ?_n>^e_# ^7/-9b9^ m TiPa OF Rc'iJF.Sr _ Conditional Use _ Varir-nco K<it 1 ands Va rianc4i fi ^ ________________________ ____Ripi-ap Address p^e a-^^ER jjA -_3c- K acl o pi:y.e #jv 7/: Address 3jC^ /-s\ric /^ocn ue ~~~ ■ .. • w ^ --—------------------------ >/Present Zonijig I Present Use ^ jP,b‘ /zcrtlag Ordinance Saction Relating to Ro.:faest 3V-.55 2 ». * “ ■' ■ '• Specify Ordinance RscjuireirenU 30 M« i b0XL< POR OFFICIAL USE CTJLY Council Action I^te Approved ' D.rnicd ^ « _yc M • c\^s ~ AR^A''^.).7& o Set /^r~^ /i.f/ot-n ■— • • Explain Request Relative to Re^iresients <vAA\-V»C'r> c/^ -H^ct-'Jivvcl-cv' C\fxrac\-6- g^oe. /O A4-. /^»-Dvw ^dcVxQv \ ^ 6.vAOcr-iCVS /\rewx V q-V Uwg, 0^^ ^ieVe, , Extent of Nan-conforadt/ <y^5rr g/^/ yA/>p~ bj^' — LcYA^iA - if. s a /=T ^ -------------------------------sr*—----------------3* 4er u/tor^^ fjif 'Hardships to Property (Your reasens for requesting this Variance or Ccaiditional Use Pemd —<14^o*\ G.\ mt^own ^or ao>c&Qe A heA^Os'wS . ~TV\e 6>4<S%i\tiw u>Qvx.\d ^‘xvj-e -e>cV%-u v^t:ed€d vt ^ovw \v \ VlZ-^ cVv-eAx ■ m-c o. # MATERIAL KECESRABY PDR OOS PLEIE APPLICATICN Otist bt subniitted 1 vaek prior to Council Meeting} 1. Arolication coii^ 2. Plat Secticn 3. Survey (Sketch ty 0kner'$ List of ft.) (150 ft.) -within _____, ___ from Karmepin County Registrar of r j i. Data /HOJ^XA 3, 7S \ \ rg ^ I I \ ‘ I • I # ^• • - * ........ H (cf LO'Afia; 0? PKOKi^AL Cor pro^^rty) Acyress !^SC^ Lo. f > c A\/ c)>>v-vgi V j3._____ I>c*^al Pj&cnption J-Of ^ OI OC ^ *-/, /Jo.VCKCf t, APPLTfANr £.v .x ^€a n>rine I ^j7/ * f 5£S Adi3ress i'iO'?) /1v'e»M^e — a-^.'ER Kajio ^US^€.II JchACCn P>:on2 # ~ yj' ~ " ■ - . Address 3*^0^ r i c /joe n u c — ■ (,Jfc.o \ ^ajd. .• >/Present Zoning 1 Present Use /Z^lsg Ordinance Soction Relating to Rrajoest 3V- »^>S ^ __ • «• Specify Ordinance Ksquireirents 3Q M- i jpOi£,IC_____ TiP'o OF RcQii.-.Sr • _ Conditional Use Variance . <■* __V.’otlaj'ds Variance __ ^ Rip'i*ap rcC FOR OFFICL^L U.^ OA.Y Camril Action Date Approved Denied )0 M •/i/iE/i'Z.).7^o Set /^/-^ (t/iir/4 '-taa* ✓ Explain Request Relative tc Re^iirttients <vAd»-V.c^ ef^ -Kxct-vxwd-cv (\(ua{\^ '" J - - - - - . \ ~ ^ ^ ^ X ■ ~ W w ' U;’AN\ \:ov\nA d^oL(vrA<.v^ gioosie: /Q ^4♦■ \(sV V>w^> gAdCi-\ov>. ^ tt • 6*/^* );o\y\Q &vj.(xr-<gr‘S 4^./* Arewx \o~V V. wg, Qix u;-€V^ t>>c\ Extent of Ncn-confonnityfc/^gr s/^/ Y app - iT.9^ LoTAgjA — S<^ '/=T < & 4«r WtOTH-- 'Hardships to Property CVour reasons for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit fOf<A d d A;-Vx ot\ 6.\ vtiowN ^or gtycagg ^ \2>eA^QN^S . ~\'V\e 6.(K(Mi\^v\ VuOQv>^^<^ Oy'xvi^ y\t:ed€d yt >Oyy \. •xvn \c3 cV\«\N * ar^ci KATERIAL KECESR-yor FOR OOf-PLElE APPLICATION (Mist be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting) 4i »■ i 1, A;mlicatian rvJi^et 2. Plat Jfep Secticn 3. Suney (Sketch in 4. ^itiffedT’f^erty Owner's List of c^ers within (300 ft.) (150 ft.) ♦ from Hennepin Ccxinty Registrar of 'jI1 j Date /VlOJuCk 3,/f7S SCftLE* r§ so* CLKI i;-ICAH- • % * ? ‘*'1' X*' V^*7i *'*|V.;^1,- ' >AA*VU ‘ O------— 3.: pa*- tj- ^ f'-J '-. ■ -iK Jr I ■*5 :^ - -Nr '.•'H ]^’:t . tMs’s •* S 9 « >o ^ 9 SCALE* r»SO* DENOTES 'RON l.'.CNUV.EST 1.I J : f ChKll|-lCAH£ 01' SUKVtY SURVEY FOR PSGSr JOHNSON fm0/r c ' KSCfljlir^VyVV'-i ^h(L(x ’^AJLfO’ (j^dih/y^ ^ duCC'na -th. j^jO^ ew*(CU ht<uU. uycaX Sftocr #u^T- (if, I* 2/t^-m. -XtV»C dd-dxtAA-noJt Ju Sr'ftOML I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries ofi Lot 23, Block Navarre Heights, Hennepin County, Kinnesota* And of the locations of all buildings thereon, and all visible encroachr.ents, if any, fron or on said land. As surveyed by ipe this 29th day of February, 1978. Land Surveyor, !-.inn. Heg. No. 95=7 Willis L. Gilliard Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor 7601 Vt’ayaata Boulevard, Suite 21S rUnneapolis, I'.innesota 55^26 Telephonei 5**8-556l ft dlpartk-:nt of finance ij^ ^ -603 govep.:j;*ent center ^ KINNEAPOLIS, KN 5SA87 ft’’’ //maD c2/fM4::,^i- I PROPERTY O’.-NERS LIST NW-‘.E ADDRESS Oj/O^.DQlfP&?j 1^0 A _,(J>Qvv ■rn'Mixip!- ^ S ^-S ^4 ViN c (l oxT* viix^-->rcr^ kt Ife' poN/¥C-I> ^ DESCRIPTION LOT ^ z-r-=-- - 5 BLK.PARCEL MjMfTfi, -.. ____________________ >cr7/^------ ----------------------- . ,-- . R/g>7pKg 3i //J/}s tHIHlSCftsetL -■H^iZ 3‘"'^-fii,s-S£A^4 ■je.ci- flv3u97 <W/t«c flVjr i2 7 3 'I 51 2^ 2: '7-lL 2m 226a 36jk 37Sd ^6Si ‘ft306 pnftJ L. l/MOKUiD \^0S' L-'/filC fNtT ;/?4/vr^p ;2g^ 4 g-. x>g4i ?g.dsg:/3-ir;/&ife z <^75E iptNNrt m.i-ietJ'■ , OtNNft fn.t-i&N _A w Vl3ya< ^ ■ J ■X I ( j hi I \ V 4 ( • < • ^ 1 ;•-------- • • • i J -1 #368, I - V U) *sA Q \i J K.• Vt J ( -■:.*. * K > r-rr*'^ r ( # ( - t ' p’ I ■ 1 — ‘i ■ I -r ♦ _ * I -I • » • \ I • i . 1 I • » I^ I ^ i i i \ - r I 4wi i- TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission #3G3 Hank Muhlch, Zoning Aduinistrator March 17, 1978 i A SUBJECT: American Builders (Fred Herfurth) - 2400-6th Avenue North Subdivision (Preliminary) - Sketch Plan Review Mr, Herfurth is requesting approval of the subject 17+ acre parcel into 4 lots. Our current procedures include sketch plan review by the Planning Commission. Therefore, we will not be able to schedule a public hearing on this proposal until the Planning Commission has a chance to review the sketch plan and direct staff to schedule said public hearing. The entire parcel consists of approximately 17.4 acres. The survey indicates 2 wetlands areas of .55 acres and .60 acres as conservation and flowage easement areas. The proposal as submitted consists of dividing the original parcel into 4 lots - each exceeding the minimum lot area and width requirements in this zoning district (RR-lB - 2 acre area - 200 ft. lot width). I'm enclosing copies of the following exhibits submitted with the proposal: 1. 2. 3. 4. Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Subdivision application form Property description Copy of plat map locating subject prope/^ty Topography and survey of property indicating divisions as proposed 5. Exhibit E - Property owners list (neighbors) Exhibit D indicates the wetland conservation and flowage easements as determined by the surveyor. An additional 10 ft. easement along County Road #6 is also shown on the survey as are the drainage easements along lot lines and required setback lines on each individiial lot. Copies of the subdivision proposal will not be forwarded for review by other departments and agencies until Planning Commission completes the sketch plan review. . . !i a £S(ifiS/r-Acinr OF otoNo, mdwesota 3/JcO i> rt4^ Land U s;r Application Lnet. location of Property t ■ P.Jll fio ^ y- iJI/AlfiUl igai Inscription of Property: »7>eri / yo Ov %<y 7i ‘' . ‘ . Case No._________ •• • . * Fee Date • • 1 / j 4 Wit < i /V * • XPhone) of Kequest:Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Permit JC S'jibdivision Approval Other rsefiptio^of Request: by^/ . (Aort(Appl^caritJ .v»cJ^ A.:l4<Si1^2__lyo ___^ \ • ease draw or attach a slcetch of proposed structure showing the foTlo^truig: 1. Indicate Nor^ 2. location on lot 3. Adjacent Street Karnes • •* , ' " 6.* Dimensions of proposed structure ’* 7. Proposed setbadcs *>. • 8. Zoning in force in this area . ■'nSsJtaJ>uu^.“^ ““ of odiocent SUfiVE^^ Distances lietween any'prised structures ^ ‘ • and structures m adjacent prqperty. - ^ ^ i Bdiibit &ibinitted: « • or plat shoiSng the propei^ affected and all lands within 300 ft. of the boimdtfies the property affected hy proposed change.* . , tractors or attoinqfs certification listing the names and address of the owners of __ land wi^in 300 ft. of the boundaries of tl« property requesting the <>'hange or rezoning hose names appear on the records of the County Auditor of Hennepin Coun^. tion showing SOt of property owners within 300 ft. favoring rezeriing or variance. age reconniendations: ^ ' • • • • '• m •- «> • • • • . • • # £xH>etr B GORDON R. COFFIN |,ANO «iUMVtVOM AND f*LANR<tP S02S V%ATlHTOWN WOAO LO*«& UAMC . MINN ftftSSft 47> •*-1 .'i-78 Cf-J.'SSP.VrtTIC'N rXSr>’:-:KTS Doscriptlono for FireoricV. C. in the Soufi.euct \/t, of Section 2E-li6-23 TVt o-rc*-! of lend inrl-jdod vithlr. the clrca-ferenre of * circle a wclu- of <90 feat, the rortar of raid circle leinr daacrilad ss folios* L ’:;:-tnc.rt corner of the rorthc.st or to-.T,ohio .-U v. ro -“rj'-.r, V!l ""ii-rliil'it 1‘. rccSourh\%c tt. ^0'. Urx or . cis«r.oo or SX feel, thcoc. deU.ct- in^ rifcht 7v?° e distance of feet to saio renter o. circle. Tliat port rf t>.e North-ast quarter of the SoMtheu.t q;«r^r of TownsSp 118 North, Hanfa 23 Vest of the ttU rrincipal Meridlen, ^Merited 11 f^.lovf; Cor.r«nrinG at the point of ir.terrection of the Vest lin« of the Sest feet of stid I-c rtheiet quarter of the Southeast quarter with S line ^f said I^rtl.eaat quarter of tic Southeast South alont said V^st line of the Saat &C0 feet a ^istanw of 310 to the point of beG-lnnlnn of the property t^irg -escrioec; thence Mntin^n„ South along said Vlest line of the ilast 5 0 f«et a clctonce o. ^^^^-cet, tJ.ence defleetins right 60® a distance of 110 -I It pqo « distance o** 90 feet; llienre deflooting rie,ht 103 ” - c^s.-nce 50» . di=t.r.c. of 83 foot, th.enc. Southeasterly to the point of becinr.ing. '//S/7- C Kuun lib, COURTHOUSE • MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55415 * f J . i\ J FT PROPERTY OWNERS LIST £ NAME ADDRESS P I T IU3 R 7 Pi./^~r /^00?'7 pin Jj£C Z,a ‘17 PLa^-t- /nnn:pF^ JHOrnAt^ U/g/-s/r#> <Ef a 'Fr<«T k«u«r., . DESCRIPTION LOT BLK. PARCEL ^c_o.^_5.aJw j^4.i^/O MeotMA L5gg 7-7 T/IA Plot ,/7?giC G.Tuim=*. ^ fUAUiJt/ Q \a/cca^ iLgyy/^ <2.07^ ^+. I •--------------- U/. kindtty '^<er£u^^lfs, flifta' 7 --Lt»t^ & X+->b B«iL 15» ^*i>7 Qpr>iiV~> 15J. JS IS/4- 3ec T?/i/^lg 7-^ /•F<-^31z^I3Z& -g|£aA)<r^ fogg. FA9p~/=Amn i-QlAl_IZM/£^__ N/gg*r Tit/A:^ ^ I 0«.ciL .U'. ice itd/£.S I CrM^lw 6li;^ -?Yk|v JS!f Ml W*<a Tnu/ -i*/>^L«J u ■ hit. <5'g<t. i*v4«.pe no<»tCfcr*lK^r t A A Aa«b* 6i rV I -1»^ - ------(_. J«.Ui. .U*. 7^&L<.rcn j4o/ 40ZC3 scaa Lt fUrv ^lQ/ t-' •** *™* «Pf«»*nUtton of Mof «tow — H appeara ttin df on w» ••“»•• «»tli« Hmni. Co. FioMco i»v.. to tttm h—« ,§ ____Co. Flimieo Mniiiii^ - »tr-» j £XK(0fT-- £ DESCRIPTION LOT BLK. PARCEL 6>/<D eo»ycD Lai 154. 4^ ■ ‘*fe ^ l(9-77» \ \ ^I*] finance DIVISION '•,.. ;; 603 Adtninimatim Towtr 1:^" ' r , -i Hann. Co. Govtrnhient Cantar ^' '* 1 ; «E TRANSACTION INVOICE M *■ a* • • • ; V »A ■•.; ■» ». , „ i- -jr--'* - -V' .■F ' ■ ' • «• _ ' \ ' ! '■J'’ • •■4 i i issued Ky I ‘ -r V , » ' - . - ‘ .A a . -A . . S \ yi/? , i;Data _2.r.iZr_3fi__ #• •-• r- Organ 574 7 Program 94/2. Account 54^ No. of Units : ;\ Rate Total V/ ^ Detail of service performed T ^ . -» ,'^ .aa>Tt. V Make checks payable to Director of FirtancR »nw m -i j •• ^ ■ 603 Administration Tower Henn Co r« ' P«e Cashier. ___ ' ■ Government Center, Minneapolis. MN 55487. ■Aanif _■*» FEE AUTHORITY The charges made hereon have been IamiaH n r* » Minnesota, 1969, which gave auth^rL to Chapter 692. Laws of missioners to set fees for certain w * ®nnepin County Board of Com-Tb....„bM„"toe,r:.TFr^ "■• “»■«• hiring on August 16 1977 a^d 11 L August 30.197r . '' “‘‘I Board on COPy-Cusiomer. PMK C^V-f a. laiw ■. r TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Connnlsslon ♦ Hank Muhlch, Zoning Administrator March 17, 1978 SUBJECT: Ben Dye • 115 Smith Avenue Variance - Rear Setback This property is located in RR-lB Zoning District (2 acre). Lot size and location of existing structures are non-conforming. Mr. Dye would like to build a 12* x 24* addition to the rear of his existing residence. A 50 ft. rear yard setback is required in this district. The proposed addition would result in a 3 ft. encroachment of the 50 ft. setback requirement. A variance of 3 ft. would be necessary for Approval. Since the one variance is necessary I would suggest we address the remaining non-conformities. The lot lacks 100 ft. in width and 68,970 sq. ft. in area. The existing garage is approximately 12% ft. from the road so a variance of 37% ft. is necessary. I believe we could request the applicant to remove the existing non- conforming kennel. The following exhibits are enclosed: 1. Eadilbit A 2. Exhibit B Variance application form Survey locating existing structures and proposed addition Plat map indicating site location Property owners list (neighbors) Letters from neighbors with no objection (Backstrom, Merchant and Quay) 6. Exhibit F - letter from applicant explaining proposal 3. Exhibit C 4. Exhibit D 5. Eidiiblt E CITY OF ORCNO, MINKESOTA!# Condit^nal Use and Variance Appllca LOCATICW OP PROPOa-U. (or /T ^ ^ #36 A2i: Miress //^ <.v// I*sal Description /../ /S APPLIC/Wr __________Phone I v?3-/d:?< OVMER Name ^ A>/ r- -//^^ Phg^e I Present Zoning i^/? - /Q Present Use /?£ S Zorting Ordinance Section Relating to Roj^st 3^. *• - - TYPE OF REQUEST Conditional Use Variance Ketlands Variance Riprap Fee I <90 t J FOR OFFICIAL USB CNLY Council Action Date Approved Denied jUTMuprtf &iP¥Y 9cr3Ac^ ^ E«pl.to Request Relntlv. to te».lr.nent, A/, ^t of Non-con&ndtjr Kudshlpt to Pn^riy (Your reuois £er nqiiestij>( tUs VoTlanco or Oadltlcud (bo Foait I \ MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR OOhffLElE APPLICATION ^Ixst be submitted 1 vedc prior to Council Meeting 1. plication conpleted 2. PIk Map Section 3. (Sketdi in proposal) 4, Certified Property Owner's List of ^ers within tlMMNl) (iSOft.) - from Hennepin County Rogi^nr'of De^ds 5.. 1^.00 Fee Signatun '4 \ \ ■i r i rr h a #364 I'l.l of Lur\*o;* for JVr. C. I?/e of Ty>t '/3* Oror.o Orchurds Ht-nnyr ln Co^intv, !-!lr;n3s3ta eKHi8ir-2 ; / Cer*vi.'i3tte of Curv*»v: I c*^rtifi' t’l-t ♦his is & trw «md correct re’-re^cr.V-tiort of a :»ur\'e’ of the c'Ourri'.T ioc of ,/>*. 63» I’rf" o Orcharuc, Gn:' t:.e iocation of l'iX •-•xisviii,; tnil.;int9 ..h'renr.. It 'loos not pur:crt V> s}rw other irorove: ‘••its or er.<*ro_ch ’>;rt5, »Cilo: o : 1" =r 50 • 3-7-7t Iron .Turker «.rie tun''*^or in- - r *-«■» ■- . -«hri1^iiinniii^^rrrr - 6!^4iAR\ ^7X ll r ^Td SAvfT^vE" f ---------—---------------- 1:1 - % i h- U Bichaxd P. Baclcstroa 95 Siilth Av«. OronOf Minnesota Orono Village Council Oronoy Minnesota 13 March 1978 exht'Vv'f-1 Gentlemeny #364 Mr. Ben Bye of 115 Smith Ave in Orono, our next door nel^bor to the south­ east, has shown me his ideas to remodel and enlarge his house. His. ideas * include enlarging the present structure approximately ten feet in a north- westnrly direction, toward our house, and approximately 15 Poet in a south­ westerly direction. i I endorse these ideas of Ur. Bye*s and encourage him ^to proceed with this project. This endorstfaent is presented to the Village Council for their consideration when reviewing Mr. Bye's application for Building Permit. Youra truly. yf < / / • ✓ > 'U .i !!'ttL o C k^£ >' A '-^''Vuvu*-^ d • ^ - l/^(•ij* -*V I ' •:•• •— • — •• -■« . ji#\*i s^^cuAC. AfAj^tctll^2c^u9y\ -i^-«rr>v,J^Su«J? <L^ V/& nT*^'yrJj^A, jO(M^ CL^k>\^ . •J ______ ^ r>» ^ • ;^- - - * # r. • ]tA«^ A>w<^^iJ(^0t,Q^^^. ' j k^ a.j2JQ1^.«->i u ^%jC jC U-tJ^MJUO ^.CL^4^' v^.*--V U>i^ , _ _ _ ^ >;> V •% ^ . 4 ^ • • -‘ >yv ' ■ ', ,* * , # * ,' /* • > ;. •—-( . ;• *. ' - ^ ,v*'--.- '" A ‘ j r • ' • fr- • . * . ■i V ». - . „*,- -Pit^,0.ucJLASLM 'a-y^pQ.—y>^-SSl'^J - V • .* K »> '\ ■ ♦. •- »■X •" ’i .» . 0 ■•. #•A-r*’ \ *«> •l^t; #• - • •■'Mr fm •••■.-r-v J /(j /*^7^ K j^ 7^ 'Afyi- #364 :_^ -X’„ - J^^j /Cttx^ '7u^^y/$cZ. li'.\£ -..y 2^' £e^.. ^ m -----'.rJ ■■ii;-i,>v 1 ■ ' ■■ \r^ ‘. '• .<;: f.. s> :*r^ i?s:7 ;‘ ; V'*‘? y y^M Vt Z' - -.1^* •,; t«- V r tr •■ k. * * -V V*''t * - v^ t:-r" *'. V V *. ••»' . .»* ’i ■W. V . .. s •» ^ *-1 » » •Mw;t' « *. * J ’ ■ ■' 'V' • "; / »4k w • 4 1 V ' r- , V u . ■• - y ^. k* ’V ^ • .; * ¥ »► * 3T* V ' / • t y-iy »4e -•_ ••. 'V ♦>,; » 4. r "■t "W’r ■ft-v -1* >: --l: 1- s’-M < *. • • i- P„ N i ) : i • ! r.arch 12, 1978 To: Grono Planninc Comnircion I?e; 115 Crrith Avenue Fror.i ren C. Dye The intent of this letter is to rhov hrirdshinr to proj'erty or. II5 fnith Avenue in rectii'os to variance application. The first hardship ic space. The eyirtir.^ structure hac 6°5 square feet of useable floor space. This is the size of. a snail epartrent. The need for additional living space ic creat. The second hardship is appearance. Because of oricinal cor.ctruction the building taltes on a chanty appearance. The proposed addition vill make .lest use of the existing structure while changing the appearance to a coherent monostructura - not an add-on look. This vill result in a major neighborhood improvement. The third hardship deals with ph.j’Eical restrictions, l.e find it wculd be difficult to build in any other direction than proposed, the reasons being as follcusi 1. Northwest - The well is located near the center of the northwest wall epprorimately six feet from structure. There is also a large tree approximately 16 feet from structure, 2. Northeast - Although there is 25 feet of space between the two existing buildings, a deck on the garage building reduces this space to IS feet. Any structure added on between these two buildings would only allow six feet of space sepaiating them. 3. Southeast - The southeast wall is 28 feet from lot line which is insufficient space in which to build. The fourth reason is dealing with solar energy. In the proposed plan a gi*eat majority of the windows will be located on the southeast vail of the addition. These would be high efficiency, triple-glased windows ar.d will act as a passive solar col— • * lecting BystctTi. The walls of the ©Tieting stinicture will be heavily insulated aa will the walls and ceiling of the addition. This will contribute to energy efficiency of entire house. Locating the addition on any other area would greatly reduce the cajacity for this type of solar collection, and energ;,' efficiency. In conclusion, what we intend to do with this addition is to create a more com­ fortable, energy efficient home. It should also be stated, that permission was obtain©' in writing from all adjoining neighbors, be feel the addition would greatly improve “to appearance of the neighborhood and +he City of Orono: and would gi^atly appreciate your compliance to the variance reruested.% Tharil: you. r.r. Ben C. Dye / BCDrcdcc TO; FROM: DATE: Planning Commission #365 Hank Muhlch, Zoning Administrator March 17, 1978 SUBJECT: New Horizon Enterprises, Inc. (MT. & Mrs. Dunkley) 2380 Shadywood - Conditional Use Permit New Horizon Enterprises Is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate a child care center and several other services at the site previously known as the Calvary Memorial Church on Shadywood. I'm enclosing copies of the following exhibits: 1. 2. 3. Exhibit i\ Exhibit B Exhibit C Conditional Use application form Survey of property Sketch of property Indicating approximate location of structures and parking Plat map Indicating site location Property owners list (neighbors) Letter from applicant explaining operation of facility - attached to this letter are several letters from others endorsing similar operations 7. Exhibit G - Letter from State Department of Health 4. 5. 6. Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F I would suggest we review the proposal during our work session to determine if any additional material might be necessary. After receiving the data necessary, I would recomnend we schedule a Public Hearing with regard to the proposal. f . I_-- cm OF ORCNO, HD^SOTA Caiditianal Use and Variance Appllca U3CATICN OP PROPOSAL (fir pn^rty) . I**a Descriptlo. APaiCANT ^ ^ Conditional Use ___ Variance Wetlands Variance Riprap »5•u /</>—Fee cauA9^t^ ^w/va<Phone i FOR OFFICIAL USB CNLf Council Action roved Pre«»t t^=d^. !C t,^ ^ tou* Ordinance Secticn Reletln* to ttn»st 3ti^ •/»•»*> Specify Ordinance Requirements CoAfD, ^ kE^Uiiftp —£j05 ---fl^K rAfiP C£A/r^^ fiqplein Reqpjest Relative to Reaulransnt* *. ___ • . _ Extent of Non-confbmlty A « ‘Hardships to Property CYour "•««* fcr lOTiastiiig this Vsrlsnco «• CenditlOBSl Use taatt 1. 2 3 . plication coopleted • Pl^ Mp Section . Slavey (Sketch in proposal) 4. Certified Property Owner !sList_of CMiers within (300 ft.> mmMj^ ^ fro^Hennepin Casity Re^stn^^ 5. 1^.00 Feo P«te J»- y- 7y Signature \ :fESmOOiDi&ALIV A OONSTRUCTIO 5920 HAR0SQIAB31E CIRCLE MOUKIUSt B9364 (612) 472-S768 rrr rnlvuT-v' y* v-rf'il '’♦mrrh In filoy'r Knv*irn nml Vt ■•lor’-- Tf»w?irit.i' (f 23 9^ snm^P Rp V4$f)^40(, !r 1 #30@ »»n t n rf “urvr;/t ' V-ir *1 . ft-rtl'y t* "t, IKIp i** 1 tru* prrl ror- r''*"r«nnrt'i* If n n<' n siiH'^y «r U*o Io*ifi')ar!p!’ 'f !«ta V‘, , .■’I, nrrt /2 *‘'?i t’v»‘:rro A ?'!'- . ^ •m'l n(* ;/>» 0, { ^ 1«ipV Tf'wnrlt'i nf Vinr'lcn ioirrliwv* ••:• !>llow-i n»irlnn!ru* at tho Ki>r|h«artrtplv nrrni-r rf r.«|.I f<nt ’inrUiW**; •opIv 'ilmi? t.hn >.rTtii**rl *• rif naif "f't. *>• fi' t^*f» ''r-pnicMPf •«); pr tho fU’tillr nir— nln;* nn»*rii*r f.».H *• an'( ’aif i ' •IQ **lnnn«'nVn V«ki* Hark aH !*• 1* Main JIcQc (pnw Onirty *to»«<l tv , i'< thrnn»»’ Tif"itht‘n-*ur\*- nioni *>•'’ 1>rlhonf ♦.orV* l!n*- p** rt tl.m K<int«irV*' I'r.n rf ’^ol t.i-.-»... Nf*r*hfirlv alnr" ♦}■•’ i-;v r*'’ ppjrt U » * tr <v Int r> ’ tx'r ’-ni; . •ir- *’ cT thn lorallm o'* a' l b;*!- Irr." *>Tf aiH all vlfllM-* anpr*'»rV*‘'rfi>n, II* ary, frru or on r*il ’ lar. •, Gr r *r n I«»iri'| '■.u''’'Pvfr Mnd 'I'imk” !^nr i.nWn, T lrr-**' T.*. / y #1 '< pnr. » . ..4f, , .'r,/ ‘•raloj I" ' f\ ' nnio : ••-lv-71 t lrn»i r.-irkpr / / y <•'t^ntrrimr •r', ** m% •■>i|rw «* ff*t •S/* ^ mi t? nf-iSy loT '• M¥»m ip3i t-H - ouyt M ------1. . --------- - ‘ '^0f/n iimm of ■' f 1 *f' t V • » #365 eXHiGiT-C I ^ I V•I XJ£m/ HoGfZM S, Aoat:*A>t Z/f>«x/r* J I f? * • x9. •-• • c *% •# 3:6 5 yn q: cc o >. <L y z A ; a o ft*. ^ ^ • O S'?,a: >- a • •< ^ g »\ o O S X O X #365 X> .n; 4M . ^ a: Q: o >. ui >- p o. W z . 3; g 8 ^^■• e“s-.2 ^ ft li ' ^ ^ «§ o 5X O I "■•I A. —.V" ) *V. i' I i 7 ML JS-C'is| 18*1 ?“ 5 ^ ^s*»-1 »« sj I N* I =-r<V/:, s .C « - ;v PROPERTY OWNERS LIST ADDRESS ^(t> ^^5[Nes Co^\®*^ '•i-^-C=QS£ve2,.^ SSucoY '#b65'£xtHOf^ description lot I BLK. \,d!t^ a'>^ 2)- J&L JsO gyy> >vn iO --------------------------------------- SoVjfv n^.Qt-Qj »»OAi[S?Sr^- xioW^kLHWo --1. \tl^C:\5 "K aS6 S W^oXe*oV\^^ llaoc biQf aIi oS XLiOC l3Uof I^QC ^OOr iiaal MteOC |!:iSQL llOOi '&aAQ_ Mqq. '9ooo ■■’"-----------in________ ---------------O^ 50( LOT BLK.PARCEL Jm OSOQ h^4—isoo] liiDa li^OD I 4-31 1500 1 ^ ;' i' i s I' ?nfers £% h» fSJ7— F^.^ew ^JCorlzon ^Jbatj Care Cenlers £%HiS/F* ^)0 JUtpJalt Dlcmtu ^vrlk, CBrooUft CmUr, JKmnraota 55i30 (m) 566.1117 iSmt ^mkttj (6t2j5*6J038 March 8, 1978 Planning Conunlssion and City Council City of Orono Orono, Minnesota Re:Operation of New Horizons Child Care Center Conditional Use Permit of Site'known ** Calvery Memorial Church at Co. Rds 15 6 19 Gentlemen: The purpose of our application is to obtain a Conditional Use Permit for the above location as New Horizons is very much interested in purchasing the premises. We would like to tell you briefly who we are, our intentions and adequately explain to you why we feel such a Conditional Use Permit should be granted. New Horizons was founded six years ago when in Brooklyn Center we opened the first nursery school, followed by the Maple Grove Nurse^ School. Approximately two years later, realizing the existing for expanded child care on a full time basis, we opened the Brooklyn Park facility as an all day child care center. Within a few menus time, the Spring Lake Park facility, offering both nursery school and full day care for children was opened. In August 1977 we opened our Plymouth location offering a complete range of day care and nursery school services. In Plymouth, we purchased, renovated and utilized a church facility after obtaining a Conditional Use Permit. We are established in these fiva communities and have provided a very neces­ sary service. We will provide to you letters from each community attesting to our programs, our valued service and most importantly, the continued growing need for such facilities. Child care centers are educational programs that help a child become independent, inquisitive and learn to share, love and respect their peers and adults. They are structured similar to a kindergarten classroom but do not take the place of such. We work closely with each school district to see that our material correlates to theirs. Our day care centers are not babysitting services, we are educational schools where the children learn, grow and have fun in a structured atmosphere with certified teachers at the helm. Horizons, at the present time, in our existing facilities, has 40 employees, 24 of whom are certified teachers for the approximate 450 children now enrolled. New Horizons is a private school, licensed and governed in all its existing facilities by the State of Minnesota. We are federally certified for Title 20 children. r ? Ic Page 2. Our goal is to operate a complete child care and nursery school facility in accordance with the standards achieved in our other centers. Our services may also include night and weekend child care to meet the needs of parents working hours other than 6 AM to 6 PM Monday through Friday, and all such other times when such services may be needed, such as hospitalization of one parent, unexp'^cted trips, weekend vacation retreat for parents who wish to leave their child in a safe, responsible and educational environment. Our purchase agreement with the ualvery Memorial Church is contingent upon New Horizons obtaining a Conditional Use Permit on or about April 15, 1978 for our needs. Our research indicates a need in the community for the services we provide beyond the services provided by other facilities in the area. The services our school hopes to provide are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Full day care - 6 AM to possibly 10 PM during the week Toddler care - children from 16 months to 31 months Pre-School care - children 31 months to 6 years of age Latch Key care - children up to 12 years of age (before and after school hours for working parents) Specialized Nursery School Program for pre-schoolers Drop In Care - hourly - children from 16 months to 6 years Weekend day and evening care for children in all of the above age ranges. this weekend and evening care service may or may not be offered depending cn the response and need for ^lddit^cnnl inocme that the accessory services mentioned below would provide. We, at the same time, would like a Conditional Use Permit to allow the following accessory services: a. b. Rental of the building for community and other civic gatherings including such activities as plays or offering movies for children on weekends. Rental of the building on weekends for wedding recep< tions. This purpose would involve alcohol on the premises. Our need in attempting to acquire a Conditional Use Permit for these accessory services is three-fold: 1. 2. 3. To provide community services by utilizing a large facility and parking lot that could easily accommodate such. To provide additional income to make our mortgage pay­ ments if the income from the day care and nursery school is insufficient. Assure the bank that there will, in fact, be enough total revenue to secure their mortgage payments. ■V- *? ft C. I-' "IHSJi i ; Page 3.;! Ha hope that your decision will be to approve * CondiSonal vle Permit. In your determination, please consider the following: )4 1. 2. 3. T 4. 5. f .>f,' irr^ pr<^ tift ^ 1 6. The benefit of our service to the community and the residents thereof. ^Our experience in and with other communities. Presen^y, the zoning LR-IC in which this property is cSrn«rare%!?eMn?irio"^ bM It is our intention to renovate and improve the building (S)^'^Construct a fenced-in playground,, approximately 2500 square feet or 50 square feet per child, with a chainlink fence, having woven wood or (b) We^will make^ali*intcrior and exterior improvements to complj i?th state requirements such liahtinq, carpet in designated areas, additional bathrooms, kitchen renovation and all such improve­ ments as designated by the State Coordinator, Sally Th. the existing church Include, the two edj.cent lots which will provide ample and safe parking for pp mately 125 cars. Should you have any other questions St^473-5550*or^snJs:5j3ni%j;5?Te^;^ythe additional information for your consideration. '» i ■ t 1 Very truly yours. Sue Dunkley, President SD:dd Enclosures ■i ,31 V.* • i^tr4wrt««r at i • r-7-.'<. k:: ^ ■ CITY OF Brooklyn Center 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER. MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE (612) 561-5440 April 2, 1975 Mrs. Sue Dunkley Hew Horizons Nursery School 1200 69th Avenue North Broo)clyn center, Minnesota 55430 Dear Mrs. Dunkley: s This is to confirm several discussions we have had as to the possi- |)ilitios of establishing a formal licensed child care and day school facility in Brooklyn Center. You have indicated an'interest in constructing a freestanding building which would house this activity, and you have expressed interest in securing possible state grants or financing, which might be available. We have indicated our endorsement of the concept of a well run, properly licensed and designed child care and educational facility as being integral to the variety of public services necessary to a balanced cesnmunity^. It is our observation that your Hew Horizons Nursery School, presently located in one of the community's churches, is representative of such a service. We have consulted with you and your real estate representative as to various sites in the City which, from the standpoint of -zoning and location, %#ould be well suited to a facility such as you propose. Based upon your testimony, it would appear that there is substantial demand for a professional child care day school in Brooklyn Center and we are prepared to work with you in the selection of an appropriate site and in the review of your site and building plans, which as you know, must be approved by the city Council. If we can be of further assistance in your efforts to find an appro­ priate location and to apply for available public funding, please contact us. Thank you for your inquiry Sincerely, ^ Blair Tremere ^ Director of Planning and inspection BT:11 ■■'ii 1 _m. I ; ' : h I -tt- .-,v A' /• H June 8. 1977 To Whom It Hay Concern: Hs. Sue Dunkley established the Mew Horizons Day Care Center at the Assembly of Cod Church, 7901 Pleasant View Drive N<E«, in our City over a year ago. >•■4 / She had to make a number of revisions to the bulidlng.prior to commencing the operation of the Center. She has compiled with all codes. J Since the day care center opened, we have had absolutely no problem concerning this Center. As a matter of fact. It has been a definite assest to our Comminlty. Sincerely, CITY OF SPRING LAKE.^K SO Donald B. Busch. City Clerk-Treasurer DBB i • • 4. i f • i. < ■ ^ (L\it Auicic’t k <^£jo\niLd {Ilniicfi THE R eformed church in A merica «*V: B2 0I ZANC AVCNUC NORTH MINNCAPOLIS, HINNCSOTA SS43«VJ REV. FORREST HARMS CHURCH: 561-71 J* PARSOHACEt 566-17*3 EVANOCLICAL tw Ta ITM, P«e*RVTt«lAN IN OOVCRNMCNT February 14, 1978 J To Sue and Byron Dunkley Nev Horizona Day Care Ine, In a couple of weeks you will be complet.lng your first year's operation • Day Care in our building. I would like to take this opportunity to comnend you and your staff on the quality progran that you are running here. Prior to your beginning a day care here we did have sane reservations about h» thia arrangement would work out. Would there be conflict between church people and Day Care staff? Would the building itself be taken care of? Btc.f After one year's operation I don't know of any complaints in regard to your program from our people. You have kept your end of the arrangemencs with us in every detail and we look forward to providing your Day Care with building space in the years to come. Sincerely, Rev. Forrest Harms V I. K'' .Ji.r r* TCLtPHONC 4ti.il7I GARTH L. LAMRIK. PaRTRR » I TftcifijU (^ncue ^^AentlUtf 14320 - 93rd Avenue North MAPLE GROVE. MINNESOTA 55369 January 14, 1977 To: Whom it Nay Concern: Re: New Horizons Nursery School Wo have had the New Horizons Nursery School renting our church facilities for nursery school purposes, not day care, since September of 1973• We are thoroughly satis­ fied with the way they: pay their rent; take care of equipment and building; select their teachers and materials; handle the children; and cooperate with the church and its activities* We hove a high regard for Sue Dunkley* Sue has been a very workable person, bringing o sincere personal interest to the children, the touchers and the church. We feel New Horizons Nursery School is an asset to us as we endeavor to be a service in and to our community* Sincerely, Garth L* Lambie Pastor GLL/nl EVEN SO. COME, LORD )ESUS.‘ -----------—-------*--------^ i 1- • •-1 %rr mmmm Tr~" ‘IT UUPHONC 4a».*t7t OANTH L. lAMSIB. r«lTM ! ■ (^wt€ ^d4em6Uf 14320 - 93rd Avenue North MAPLE GROVE. MINNESOTA 55369 January 14, 1977 To: Wtaom it Nay Concern: Re: New Horizons Nursery School V/e have had the New Horizons Nursery School renting our church facilities for nursery school purposes, not day care, since September of 1973• We are thoroughly satis­ fied with the way they: pay their rent; take care of equipment and building; , select their teachers and materials; handle the children; and cooperate with the church and its activities* 'i. We hove a high regard for Sue Dunkley. Sue has been a very workable person, bringing a sincere personal interest to the children, the teuchers and the churcb. We feel New Horizons Nursery School is an asset to us as we endeavor to be a service in and to our community• Sincerely, Garth L. Lambie Pastor GLL/nl • ♦ EVEN SO. COME, LORD lESUS.* . A'' : :-1 I t • ii- I ■u : V I ( I I i I ! ' laUfck^' ?f k 9321 Washlnplon Strcrt K.E. Kinntapolls, Mn. 55434 Dear Sirs: « We are pleased to recoramend New Horizons Day Care Center, They have been operatlnp in our church since April of this year and we have found them to be most cooperative. They have constantly tried to keep up the lower auditorium in the nanner the church has requested; each Sunday when we are ready to use the facilities they are clean and inviting. They have been most understanding in emergencies as' well.-If"there should, be' *omc unforeseen circumstance in which we need the area they are wlU*“ ing to cooperate. I believe they are an asset to the church. We are convinced that Sue Dunkley will do all she can to carry out any agreement she makes with you. Sincerely, Orville W. Larson V- • V ‘ * * •* % . > ■ e’ a i 4 f t*' :\.X.'tT'' •' .V-f.‘' t23t-t-*ir* \ i ! I rr-, 1' I •• 1 Ji;' m • r • # • iprll 22, 1975 TO VHOH IT MAY CCNCERN* For the pest nine months my son has been attending Kew Horizons 'Jursery School for four days of the week. Curing this time 1 have cave to know the director, Ms Sue Ikinkley, along with the rest of her stal'f. I cannot praise the teachers and school enoiigh. They take a genuine interest in each and every child. Their concern for their welfare shows in everything they do. The program is a very veil rounded one. It has a good social atmosphere along with a learning period every day in addition to a muscle room and activities to use their motor skills. The children are involved in many special projects during the year leaxnimr about themselves*and people in the ccoaunity. They are introduced to books and music, have art projects and go on field trips. Last year my son attended The Learning Tree in Brooklyn Park. Ee never looked forward to going to school and I feel he got nothing oiit of it. Ee had three changes of teachers during the year due to management problems at the school. I could detect no enthusiasm among teachers. I was very disspi>ointed in the whole program but was initially sold on it because of the facility itself. I felt sorry fox the day care children there and mentally remarked to nyself that I would never leave a child of nine there all day every day of the week. There was Just no program for then and most of the day was spent in unorganized play. . j1 I can only wish Sue Dunkley the very best in any project involving her school or plans for a new facility or day care center. Ve have really needed a good nursery school in this area for a long time and under her direction it can only continue to grow and be the success that itls. H[miHjHMM 4 ■ n i:» ; f \ "'I ■ i .( i t A* .. )/^^uO )(2!li;>4i^t»nl> 1 w «-<^ ‘ CtGj'ne/jt^ yi£4j) /^if£yi.^£rrth '/2uW^Jiy. )Qi^^rtUJ . Ac»t^.. _oJl^ Z^rAuJO A/ia^..jC^ '.eLo:!^.J6hz,-McccAxobJA*i:i ‘CU..,^^-ri " . J&lUjl-JS^Sz J^«tf<5<‘«^5^^<^*^;^-r- •f..^^ric/uacir^..>i!>7^ ><5>^*^)kr-crMi^'>9<t^4J5ra/4(ar6^- }UlcS6LA^JUQC'r^ ,C£>c/ /tc'UO>tZo w u<iAtcA.^^U£•Jf.ctZ /i^/a 7!So/Z244£ y?. u..^•niarMiii - I . 'i Mr. & Mrs, Warren J. 'WllljAms 17602 83rd Ave. North. Osseo, Minnesota 55369 APRIL 23,1975 j,. In regarda to New Horizons Nursery School: Our three year old son attends New Horizons Nursery School and we highly recommend'this school and Its programs, The teachers are very competent and stimulating,. She schedule is structured to give the child varied academic activities, worthwhile creative art and play, activities, plus social interaction. Relevant community Held trips and speakera add to the child*s awareness. We Teel every effort should he given to help this worthwhile and exceptional nursery school, to maintain Its standards,. . ' CAi^4* Thank you. (Hrsy Karen A, Williams Art and English teacher (8 yrs,) District 2fil>Rohbinsdale . % 1 Warren J. Williams Elementary teacher (2. yrs.) Sales Manager and Company Secretary Viking Pallet Corp, -cK. i .. < V. * •■ -if''-J iiiiw, .........d k I j ■ m Dpm mirmesota department of health 717 &a delaware st mirmeapolis 55440 («l3i 29*4221 wi • •> Mardi 13» 1971 SxH/0/r- G VILLAGE OB OBONQ #365 Mrs* Sm Dunklqr 5S00 l^ndils Awmus North Brooklyn Ont«r» Mimosotn S$i»30 Duor Ht* Dunklayt Cki March 10« 1971$ Mr* Charlaa NoatM» SBnitaxlan with this DipartBWit» invMtlgatad thi food aorviot faoilltioa in tho churdi building looatod at dw intwaactlon of County HLshuay IIS and 19* in Orono* Minnaaota* fhonapln Ooin^« Iha food oorvioa facilitioa %itra found to ba in gcnaraX ooiplianM with Iha atanduili of thin DapartMnt for tha propoaad uaa of faading t^ymninafly SO pnraona in a day oara oantar. At auch tina aa tha natura oentaet thia offloa |xior to changsa* Plaasa nota that cooking* ai^ aa daap fat ftying* io not pandttad in your prasant facility* n% Charlaa NoatM at 996-439%* - t.bv N* Sbeticn Chlaf Ibttla* Waaorti and Faatauranta MINt * .4 • '^'1 an equal opportunity employer if2£'.s / * ♦ .(AaaaOttUi i i» TO; FROM: Planning Connilsslon Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator #366 DATE:March 17, 1978 SUBJECT; William Taylor - 2227 & 2229 Shadywood Road Subdivision (lot split) Preliminary Mr, A1 Quello, attorney representing the owner, has submitted an application to divide the existing parcel into 2 separate lots. The property is currently occupied by 2 residences. The residences were purchased individually by 2 separate parties. Prior to these transactions, I notified several parties of the problems that might result from situations such as this. Some of our own staff members were interested in this property. You will note the date on the application form is November 1, 1976, Several previous appointments were made regarding this proposal, but submitting the application was delayed iintil now. A Public Hearing should be scheduled on this issue even though the division appears simple. Public Hearing can be scheduled after the Planning Commission completes its sketch plan review. I*m enclosing copies of the following exhibits: 1. Exhibit A 2. Exhibit B 3. Exhibit C 4. Exhibit D Subdivision application form Survey indicating proposed split and structure locations Plat map indicating site location List of property owners within 350 ft, of subject property - certified by Mr. Quello, applicant's attorney This property is located in an LR-IC Zoning District. Lot requirements are: 1. Lot area - % acre (21,780 sq. ft.) 2. Lot width - 100 ft. 3. Side setbacks - 10 ft. proposed lots are each 50 ft, wide. Ix>t A consists of approximately 12,450 sq. ft. Lot B consists of approximately 11,100 sq. ft. The residence on Lot B is only 7 ft. from the west lot line. Therefore, the following variances should have to be addressed before the division would be approved: Lot A 1. Area - 9,330 sq. ft. 2. Width - 50 ft. Setback on existing residence - 8.3 ft. M i.i A WILLIAM TAYLOR - 2227 & 2229 Shadywood Road Subdivision (lot split) Preliminary Page 2 Lot B r ^ V;: . «. *' r'f :V #366 1. 2. 3. Area - 10,680 sq. ft. Width - 50 ft. Setback of existing residence from newly proposed lot line - 3 ft. . . ’.’T* •r# • -T fcl^ . j'.' i '4'-M ■•■I * ^ ■! .ytf^— /l.-e^<^-J-/3-76' , , /) V *, y ’66^Hx>- 00 '' ^ iff if A Case No.________________ \ OF ORONO, MINNESOTA ^ g. . ^Ftee »IiTo.OOfXX»r Land Use Application Date November 1, 1976 Street location of Preoettv: ??g7 and g?29 Shadywoea BoaO, Orono. Wlnnesota 55356 la(al Description of Ptonertr:Lot t. Block 2, Wiley ’s Park, Hennepin County, Minn. OwMr: WILLIAM W. TAYLOR (Name; Type of Request: . ___ OTd Petersburg Rd., Princeton, 1(8]^)385-5876 Indiana (Adless) ^17670 CITione) Resr-sing V'.riance Conditional Use Peimit XX Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request: Subdivision of Lot Block 2, Wiley ’s Park WILLIAM W.TAYLOR WILLIAM W. TAYLOR (Appiicantj (ONner) see plat of survey attached and attached M^orandum. Please draw or attach a sketch of’ piroposed structure snwing tne tollowing: 1. Indicate Norlis 2. Location on Lot S. Mjacent Street Nanes 4. Location of setback and use of adjacent existing building 6. Dimensions of proposed structure 7. Proposed setbacks 8. Zoning in force in this area 5. Distances between any proposed structuresPJand structures on adjacent property Bddbit Submitted: Mqp‘or plat showing the property affected and all lands wiAin or the property affected by proposed change. ft. of the boundaries Abstractors or attorneys certification listing the nanes and address of the owners of the land within*30 ft. of the boundaries of the property requesting the change or rezoning as thwi» nanns appear on the records of the County Auditor of Heimepin Comty. .fhnwing 801 ef piupiiity Village reconaendatians: A •i 'Mmi I ^xfftS! r- 3 Pitt of Survey fcr Villlac V, Toylor of Lot 4, Plock ?, Wiley'8 Park Hennapln County, Klnnesota “ •i ♦ ' *1' \ i f^r k«* B u R u MOTOM NoRTrtg.«M R.R : ^-r. Certificate of Survey: I hsntgr C0x*tliy ttat this is a trua and corract r#pr#4:arW ^lon of a aurvey of the Iwundarles of: (A) the Korthweeterly 9) feet of Lot 4» Block 2, Wiley'c Park, and (S) Lot 4 except the Korthwe#;,'' 50 feet thereof. Block 2, Wiley's Park, and of the loraticn of ali. "riating buildings thereon. It does not purport to shov other lnprov«nents or eneroachoents. «a^ 'V’ Scale: 1" = 50* ]]ute : 9-27-76 o t Iron Barker ry Gordon R. Coffin Hey, 6064 Land Surveyor and Planner Long Lake, Minnesota n •« % I k Ui_• 1 *Jl Lit. fi.V ■ ...-aiiadi-l- ■ X- r*’’- y.Kz I • M -O/-. TTF E.^1^ • -..,/ * ^ &L »'♦ M •»a • (• • «W . j lai' e '.1 1 • s i^ym'i.* K • ly ^ <y•*^i —. ft #3 -i^-f «l|?• t ,B **1 C^- -A ;s •12 ‘J4 ‘ ? 1 *^7'ui /r<*.-----------■< - J s _ ^9 ■" • 9*t - -Tl- ?. - *^#fi T ' sY191# \ 3AV \X ^ • jr l-' V' • O i^'8 J • 4 r‘✓iT [•• ■ Wl % i .1 ' \ .'2 4: »»*•• fe.. •>4mK f :^v • emieiT-D if S 6 6 SCHKnULE A f» I hereby certify the.t I have checked the original records In the office of the Hennepin County Finance Office as to property ownership within 350 feet of the subject property. The following Is from said record: LOTS 5-17, BLOCK 1, WILEY’S PARK Lot 5» Block 1 Evelyn S. Trutman 22ftt Shady wood Road Wayzate, f^lnn, 55391 Lot 6, Block 1 W. H. Fey, Jr. 2256 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lot 7» Block 1 E. S. Owen 22^8 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lot 8, Block 1 Ben Segal 3212 Dakota Avenue South St. Louis Park, Mn 55A16 Lot 9. Block 1 R. L. Kokesh 2232 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lot 10, Block 1 Michael "^rlch ^025 Colis?x Avenue North Minneapolis, Minn. 55A09 Lot 11, Block 1 James 0. Gothman 2216 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lot 12, Block 1 Sally J. Proegler and Helen Kulp Route 1 Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lot 13, Block IV. W, Young 2200 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Minn# 55391 Lots lA end 15, Margaret L. Antoine Block 1 3^75 Huntington Avenue Minneapolis, Minn. 55^116 PLAT ^13610 Parcel I800 Parcel 2000 Parcel 2200 Parcel 2A00 Parcel 2600 Parcel 2800 « Parcel 3000 • Parcel 3200 Parcel 3^J00 '■■li Parcel 3700 i_ _ _ _ f i 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _^ / ■ i. . . . . . i I 11 m #36 Lot Ifi, Block 1 Lorraine R. McOowan 218^1 Rhadywood Road V/ayzata, yinn. 55391 Lot 17, Block 1 Conrad Thorp 2178 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Minn. 55391 LOTS 1-8. BLOCK 2, WILEY»S PARK Lot 1, Block 2 Grace Lee Dahl Route 1 - Pox lil6c Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lot 1, Block 2 Robert Jungqulst Route 1 - Box 183 V.’ayzata, Minn. 55391 Lot 2, Block 2 Donald H. V/elaa 22^5 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lot 3, Block 2 Emil E. Heller 550t - 12th AVenua South Minneapolis, Nlrai'k 55417 Lot 3, Block 2 Marie C. Waldusky 5504 - 12th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minn. 55417 Lot 5, Block 2 C. D. Latkln 2213 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lot 5, Block 2 Wm. J. Carlson 2205 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lot 6, Block 2 Collin P. Reese 5960 Hlllerest Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Lot 7, Block 2 Jerome J. Lagne 2138 Shadywood Road Weyzata, Minn. 55391 Lot 8, Block 2 Florence E. Smutny 2217 Shadywood Road Wayzata, Minn. 55391 LOTS 5-14, BLOCK 2. NAVARRE HEIGHTS Lot 5, Block 2 Jalnar E. Aune Route 1 Wayzata, Minn. 553Q1 Parcel 4000 Parcel 4200 PLAT 43620 Parcel 7C50 Parcel 7600 Parcel 7800 Parcel 8000 Parcel 8200 Parcel 8606 Parcel 8800 Parcel 9000 Parcel 9200 Parcel 94qo PLAT 42720 Parcel 3020 .J ii|iitimiii ......................1V. ML* ' :• f .O’'#366 Lots 5 and 6, Block 2 Orace R. Eesner 1*100 Vincent Avenue So. Minneapolis* Minn. ^'^AlO Parcel 3^10 Lot 7» Block 2 Bruce J. Peterson Route 1 - Box 21* 3A Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Parcel 3^00 Lots 8 and 9> Block 2 Albln J. Klrsch ?20 Linden Place Excelsior, Minn. 55331 Parcel 3825 Lots 10 and 11, Marvin J. Lytle Block 2 21*69 Carmen Street Navarre, Minn. 55392 Parcel 1*210 Lot 12, Block 2 W. P. Anderson 3555 Frederick Street Route 1 - Box 251 Wayzata, Minn. 5‘:3'^1 Parcel A600 Lots 13 and It, D. 0. Schmidt Block 2 Route 1 - Box 263A Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Parcel ii825 LOTS 1 - 10. and 17 - 2H. BLOCK 3. NAVARRE HEIGHTS PLAT 1*27_A0_ Lota 1,2 and 3, Lee M. Gordon Parcel i960 Block 3 3505 Crystal Place Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lota A and 5* J. J. Hllbellnk Parcel 1625 Block 3 3533 Crystal Place Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lota 6 and 7, Dean Young Parcel 1725 Block 3 Route 1 - Box 968 Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lot 8, Block 3 State of Mlnneaota Parcel 1800 Lot 9 Block 3 "Parcel 1850 Lot 10,Block 3 " "Parcel 1900 Lot 17,Block 3 State of Minnesota Parcel 2250 Lots 18 and 19, Mark S. Claclura Parcel 2330 Block 3 Route 1 - Box 200 Wayzata, Minn. 55391 Lots 20 and 21, William H. Jackson Parcel 2925 Block 3 Route 1 - Box 200 Wayzata, Minn. 55391 C 1 I J t 3 '** y IM * ' i *■ i #366 Lot 22, Block 3 Henevleve H. Kbert 3520 Llvlnpston Avenue Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Parcel 2500 Lots 23 and 2^1, Mark A. Spalding Block 3 3508 Livingston Avenue Navarre, Minnesota 55392 Parcel 2565 > I-N . ;.v * ^ Ps.,j .•A; ; *a preliminary plat of FARAWAY #360 &■ —t --PITCH aAU3C,KTTt«UMT \0% 0*00 1*00 ■V l2 ------------------T ■■ifVl -srTft ' £LH( T«lf;j*___ Z" UTUMMtXHi MITL Z9*i *• CUkV» <5 ir dUJ^OMOt. ITHMHTf COMTWOC 52 0*00 • 7*00 0*00 10*00 a*oo it*oo 1^*00 \hr*jrti i»it tht NrifTM TYPICA’. g)TRELT &E.CTON cTwie*' «»»cvcf-« V, #.-MrMtT t*o C'-v _oH& l*<e Pofco I wo M tiUZTOTA WttO LiPHXl- ■ fc-.E-br'a /iu-e < * EMo«eWfe. <u C-* » ‘l^Vk-LLE. wlWUt^On-* •>6hV1 itijp-f-t*. \.^t- e>^p-r?9o -iKl:. 3P v'-t *^‘.r ■ ■\ / ^ CtH.- !->* »0 \V-..... i-''- -A ^ - ---X' .. 1 we' 1 Ht ».i>ir! >< I P«T M» wo i-n-- *UT jr iwe « -wi-r r>« •--------^200 — <S| i itt/»!«:># tmn *w»MP un : *IO* c.:»»wt«uci v*‘Atuze*€. •mzi.'i. ' - g '‘7-”"V Vi' *'^ *"* *'* ,' / ," '-4U---------------------r „ ' 'V TCTTEU ^iSO^ZAJL ilfj ■71)7,7^0• 10.74 Ar.*t* TOTAi- ^ET e7»'»^D -»*r« . <l.u fcc.tw cHi A*«.w S2I5L.'’ !i_' •■ < L ft1 kHti -IW- lOT L* »M *Mt •« tte ti^ m,m 9m etm Mfe^ «i ^mnm, Hm mm etm»9m m^m mm mrnm. yuiLH i> 5 MINNESOTA VALLET SURVEYOnS ft ENGINEERS CORP. pug s vg‘.;^y yJ^Jftrag^r^^ I (itAi mam aawVN Vse*j .i»