Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-06-1978 Planning Minutes**•* 4b ■ " s AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 6, 1978 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:30 P.M, __ _% % I. CURRENT ITEMS A. Action Items W'i: EFj!iK 1. 2. 3. Call to Order Roll Call #346 - Public Hearing - 7:30 P.M. Paul Raster - 2600 Casco Point Road Subdivision (Preliminary) #348 - Public Hearing - 7:45 P.M. Richard Ledstrom - 3405 - 6th Avenue North Subdivision (Preliminary) #308 - Sidney Rebers - 2060 Wayzata Boulevard Subdivision (Preliminary) & Rezoning Continue Review - New Material Obtained #319 - West Shore Lafayette Bay Association 2440 Old Beach Road - Dredging & Disposal of Spoils Continue Review - If New Data is Submitted #340 - Calvary Memorial Church - 2420 Dunwoody Avenue Conditional Use Permit - Transfer and Expansion Continue Review - Additional Data Submitted #343 - William Bartig - 605 Stubbs Bay Road North Subdivision (Preliminary) Continued Public Hearing - Revised Plan Submitted #345 - Arthur Heintz - 1565 Orchard Beach Road Variance - Lot Area and Width Don Lindall - 666 Tonkawa Road Request for Assessment Waiver - Express View Work Session Items #349 - Paul Berglund - 4460 North Shore Drive Variance #350 “ Kelly Avenue Holding Company Joint Use Dock Application for 1978 #352 - Public Hearing Scheduled for February 27, 1978 - 7:30 Byrdie C. Robb Rezoning #353 - Donald Phenicie - 3765 Togo Road Variance #354 “ Public Hearing Scheduled for February 27, 1978 - 7:45 Roger Fazendin - 2700 - 6th Avenue North Subdivision (Preliminary) #355 - Ray Waterhouse - 132 Chevy Chase Drive Wetlands Variance #356 - Public Hearing Scheduled for February 27, 1978 - 8:00 Karl Gardner - 2885 - 6th Avenue North Subdivision (Preliminary) P.M. P.M. P.M. -4 Agenda Planning Coiranlsslon Meeting February 6, 1978 ^pjPage 2 • V: V •;• ■ vVv<= ;■ C. Incomplete Items Pffi: 2. 1. #317 - John Hartwell - 820 Brown Road North _ _ Subdivision (Preliminary) 3. #294 - James McCleary - 3445 Bayside Road Dredging Application for Stubbs Bay Marina (Lacks Additional Data) 4. #306 - Colpepper Land Co, (Neslund) •- 40 Orono Orchard Rd, N, Subdivision (Preliminary) No Revised Plan *» COMPLETED ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ■ v;V •i.. ■MK: A. Completed Items 1 1. #002 - Joe Braun - 3024 Casco Point Road Subdivision (Preliminary)- Tabled 2. #266 - Crosstown Properties (Lafayette Ridge Plat) 3201 Navarre Lane - Final Plat Approval - Concurred 3. #299 - Don Eckstrom - 2140 Sixth Avenue North Subdivision - Final Plat Approval - Concurred 4. #307 - Fred Herfurth (Doug Dayton) - 1480 Sixth Avenue North Subdivision - Final Plat Approval - Concurred 5. #324 - Bernard Railing - 4480 Forest Lake Landing Subdivision - Final Plat Approval - Concurred - 6. #344 - Dr. Thomas Leach - 2535 Shadywood Road Subdivision (Preliminary) - Concurred 7m #347 - George Dixon - 3250 Fox Street Conditional Use Permit - Guest House - Concurred m 'V. V-.. iM., ^ -V-I >•- 0 Mi foR P. c. /^r&. x-a>-7f j BH f pcT CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 6, 1978 The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Com­ missioners Wilson, Hurr, Hammerel, Frahm, Hannah and Chairwoman McDonald, Commissioner Hassel attended, but left prior to roll call due to illness. Also present was Zoning Administrator Hank Muhich, ATTENDANCE-7:30 P.M. M.' 1 Chairwoman McDonald announced this was the time and place for a Public Hearing on the petition of Paul Raster for preliminary approval of a sub­ division at 2600 Casco Point Road. The Zoning Administrator presented the Notice of Public Hearing and the Affidavit of Publication. PUBLIC HEARING-7:30 P.M fAUL .\A3TER 2600 CASCO POINT ROAD SUBDIVISION (PRELIM.) #346 I He explained that this property is east of Casco Point Road with approximately 150 ft. on the lake and only one lakeshore lot with riparian rights. There is only a very small wetlands area across Lots 8 and 9. There is adequate area for each lot for the setbacks. He also stated the City Engineer had been out to view the property and had several suggestions. He read the letter from Jim Olson dated February 2, 1978 which included the following suggestions: 2. Q5 1. The driven centerline of Casco Point Road crosses the westerly parcel and a specific roadway easement should be shown. Because of very severe grades a driveway construction plan should be submitted for the lot adjacent to the lake along with the description of the driveway easement across the westerly parcel. 3. Additional sewer and water service lines will have to be installed as a result of the lot split. Hov;ever, depending on the elevation of the sanitary sewer in Casco Point Road, it may not be possible to extend a gravity sewer service line to the lakeshore lot. Because of a small amount of run-off which will drain across these two lots, a drainage ease­ ment will be required and a culvert may be required if there is any fill for either the sewer or the driveway along the north line of the westerly parcel. An erosion control plan will be required because of the very steep slopes of the lots. 4. The Zoning Administrator explained these items would have to be resolved before this request goes to the Council. t1 m m i X i •• 9I minutes of a planning commission meeting held FEBRUARY 6, 1978 - PAGE 2 s ^ - Stephen B. Woodrich, 2590 Casco Point Road, James L, Tobin, 2585 Dunwoody Avenue and Mr, D, K, Waterous, owner of property at 2648 Casco Point Road, were present. The Zoning Administrator pointed out the locations of the proposed houses on the proposed lot division After all the public were heard the Public Hearing was closed at 7:45 P.M, Commissioner Hannah felt the items in Jim Olson's letter should be resolved before continuing. The Zoning Administrator referred to the letter from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources dated January 23, 1978 which stated they had no objections to the subdivision as long as only the riparian lot has lake access rights and they preferred the access for the lakeshore lot be granted on the north border of the westerly parcel. He explained that the property already • had been assessed one water hookup. Therefore, the property will be assessed one additional water hookup and two sewer charges. In addition ^there will be a park dedication fee of $1,000 per lot and the lakeshore lot will have to be provided with access. The Commission felt that if all the items in the City Engineer's letter were met they would conceptually approve this subdivision request. Commissioner Frahm moved. Commissioner Hannah seconded, a motion to table the request for preliminary approval of the subdivision until the applicant could provide the following information and submit a revised plan: (1) (2) (3) O w A survey indicating specifically the right- of-way of Casco Point Road as traveled; and Driveway plans including fill required and driveway cross section and access driveway and utility easement for the lakeshore parcel (Lot B); and Sanitary sewer details including elevation of existing municipal sewer line and proposed connections and grades of sewer lines for each lot; and Drainage easement plans to be approved by the City Engineer including culverts under the proposed driveway if necessary; and PAUL RASTER #346 (con't) I 11 minutes of a planning commission meeting held FEBRUARY 6, 1978 - PAGE 3 # (5) An erosion control plan which could include nrulch, temporary straw bale, dikes or other techniques to prevent sediment run-off. The Zoning Administrator also indicated the following information should be submitted prior to approval for the final plat so resolution could be final without any unresolved conditions; (1) Payment of the park dedication fee of $2,000 ($1,000 per lot); and (2) Current title opinion addressed to the City approved by the City Attorney; and (3) Payment of one water unit of $580 and two sewer units (to be paid when building permits are issued. Motion - Ayes (6); Nays (0). The motion passed. Chairwoman McDonald announced this was the time and place for a Public Hearing on the petition of Richard Ledstrom for preliminary approval of a subdivision at 3405-6th Avenue North. The Zoning Administrator presented the Notice of Public Hearing and the Affidavit of Publication, He explained that Lot 1 is 13.2 acres with 6.2 dry buildable acres and Lot 2 is 5.7 acres with 4.3 dry buildable acres. He referred to the letter from the City Engineer dated February 2, 1978 which stated: 1. b. 2. a Regarding the access parcel for the two proposed lots (Ledstrom Circle); a. If this access is dedicated as public right-of-way it must be improved to City street construction standards; and If this access is to be private the right- of-way must be identified as an outlet or a separate lot within the plat; and c. If Ledstrom Circle is to be a dedicated right-of-way or a separate parcel, there must be a replatting of Lots 1 and 2, Rocky Knoll because Ledstrom Circle extends over and across these two lots. Evidence be submitted that an adequate soil absorption sewer system can be designed and installed for Lot 2; and The conservation and flowage easement be revised to follow the 973 contour line including the area across Lot 1 near County Road #6 from the wetlands to a culvert under County Road #6 at the northwest corner of the plat. PAUL RASTER #346 (con* t) * -6^’ • V. PUBLIC HEARING-7;45 P RICHARD LEDSTROM 3405-6TH AVENUE NORTH SUBDIVISION (PRELIM.) #348 I# > i 1 •7:45 P.M. )M : NORTH LELIM.) ' • ■';Wi *.. minutes of a planning commission meeting held FEBRUARY 6, 1978 - PAGE 4 ¥' The letter also suggested these items be reviewed by the City Attorney, Also, the access be developed ^and maintained as a private street, association ^Pagreeinents be considered and any improvements of P'-. the access at County Road would require approval of Hennepin County, Ev t-. m Mr, Ledstrom and his attorney, Tony Soderman, and Dr, and Mrs, Craddock, 3405-6th Avenue North, neighbors who recently purchased part of the property, were present. The Zoning Administrator referred to his original memo dated 1-4-78 which indicated the Commission might consider obtaining an underlying easement across the existing private road, that the park dedication fee would be $500 ($250 per lot), and that a request for review and comments had been forwarded to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Hennepin County Public Works Department, City Engineer, City Attorney, City Public Works Director and the City Administrator, He also stated that the access was put in about one year ago and that Mr. Ledstrom will have to submit a new plan to provide for the access as suggested. Mr. Craddock asked if this subdivision would affect his septic system. He also stated that a well had been put in and now it can pump into the pond and overflow onto his property. He asked the Commission if they were aware of thi§ problem The Zoning Administrator stated that Mr. Ledstrom started the duck pond without a permit. However, discontinued the project and came to the City and took out a permit on November 19, 1976. On January 3, 1977 the Council adopted a moratorium of dredging duck ponds and tabled Mr. Ledstrom's application. he Mr, Ledstrom stated after he was informed of the necessary permit he ceased working on the project snd took out a permit last summer. Mayor Van Nest explained that Jim Olson's letter stated Mr, Ledstrom will have to provide the necessary information and satisfactory septic system at the time a building permit is taken out. The Planning Commission was concerned that Lot 1 could support a suitable septic system since Lot 2 is being split off 21 and that property will have its own septic system. RICHARD LEDSTROM #348 (con't) n ■ /r V J '*> r-4 i ■ >' minutes of a planning commission meeting held FEBRUARY 6, 1978 - PAGE 5 There was a lengthy discussion regarding the title of the property. Mr. Soderman stated the title is clear « xcept that Dr. Craddock pays the taxes on the entire property. He explained that the Dangers o\^med both lots and sold one lot to Mr. Ledstrom and one lot to the Craddocks. He further explained legally how this property was sold as t^v^o separate lots without being divided by the City first. Mr, Craddock stated the Dangers told him this property already had been subdivided before he bought it. The Planning Commission expressed concern that the title should have been checked out before the property had been sold to the Craddocks, Mayor Van Nest commented that the City now is concerned that each lot can hold a satisfactory septic, system. The Zoning Administrator reviewed and pointed out on the proposed plat the items Jim Olson discussed in his letter. The Craddocks expressed concern that the subdivision had been surveyed the same as what they had been (2)led to believe. Dr, Craddock asked if the monu­ ments on the property were accurate and whose responsibility they were. The Zoning Administrator stated if the final plat is approved iron markers should be placed in the proper locations. Affected parties should agree to the locations. Mr. Ledstrom replied he put in the markers directly 6n the permanent irons. Dr, Craddock stated that Mr, Ledstrom bulldozed a lot and that the grade of the property was raised where Mr, Ledstrom put in the road and that a culvert had been put in, Mr, Ledstrom stated he pushed back the muck that he had taken out of the pond. Chairwoman McDonald asked if the culvert had been installed within the last year. Mr. Ledstrom replied it was put in within the last year when he put in the road. |The Commission felt the property should be reviewed, particularly the location of the culvert and the road. Dr. Craddock objected to the possibility of water overflowing onto his property. RICHARD LEDSTROM #348 (con* t) I 1 % * « ! \ pi II I 1 i i i ! i * 1 ' .■' ■ ' ■ - V--'^1. •■ >• - ir:.-.- " i‘i iiil'iiiiti'" ’ ' minutes of a punning commission meeting held FEBRUARY 6. 1978 - PAGE 6 «r © (con't) HfflW the public were her.rd the Public nearing was closed at 8:37 P.M. se^nd^H°”r ™°''ed. Co™,issioner Hurrseconded, a motion to table the request for pieliminary approval of the subdivision until the ngineer could review a revised plat which uld include the following conditions; The entire plat of Rocky Knoll be included to indicate the revised descriptions of Lots i and and designated as a private road, the road can be designated as a separate lot or as an outlet with an underlying ele­ment to the City; and ^ g se should be considered; and The conservation and flowage easement be revised to follow the 973 contour line Road #6 from the wetlands to a culvert undL County Road #6 at the northwest corner of the stm-k The Commission also requested a septic svstem the^Cit^°p ^ reviewed and approved bythe City Engineer and soil borings. ^ The Zoning Administrator also informed Mr. Ledstrom Information should be submitted cfn L >^esolutioncan be final without any unresolved conditions: IPUkw (2) (3) (4) (1) the proposed easement descriptions and dratnageways by the City Engineer; and A current title opinion addressed to the City and approved by the City Attorney; and dedication fee of $500(?250 per lot); and Final determination and direction to resolve the commonlot line, well and culvert. ©tion - Ayes (6); Nays (0). The motion passed. ^Lived"fnv'^n^"^?*'?^tor explained that he had not bC thrls^q^ "formation regarding the dredging by the West Shore Lafayette Bay Association. WEST SHORE LAFAYETTE BAY ASSOCIATION • • •*'. . . . • •.’ V t MINUTES OF A PIANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 6, 1978 - PAGE 7 f Mr. Rus Baumgardner, 2601 West: Lafayette Road, was present. He asked what additional information would be needed. The Zoning Administrator read his memo from the last Planning Commission meeting which stated that although a vote was not taken, it appeared the majority of the Commission were not opposed. Tlie Commission infoimied Mr, Baum­ gardner that at the last meeting they had asked for more detailed information in a more packaged plan. Commissioner Hurr expressed concern about the run-off from the Super Value parking lot. The Zoning Administrator questioned what distance from the top of the dike the level would be each day. Mayor Van Nest coinmented that the Commission wanted to know more about the quality of the run-off into the marsh and how the dikes were to be built and at what levels. The Commission reviewed what bad taken place at the last meeting. The Commission informed Mr, Bavimgardner that a detailed schedule of operation should be submitted including the following information: (1) The total volume of dredging, including the volume of solids and liquids; and (2) The location and design of the dike to insure seal; and (3) The capacity of the retention area; and (4) The time schedule for testing to determine the quality of water run-off and the time schedule of depositing spoils relative to the retention capacity; and (5) The time schedule of testing the quality of run-off, nutrient release and oil and lead contamination resulting from run-off from Navarre Parking lot and the quality of run­ off into the marsh; and (6) Provisions for interruptions of the dredging project prior to the overflow of the retention area; and (7) A provision for stopping of the culvert. ■I WEST SHORE. IJ^FAYETTE BAY ASSOCIATION 2440 OLD BEACH ROAD DREDGING AND DISPOSAL OF SPOILS #319 (con't) ONo action was taken at this time until the applicant submits further information. The Zoning Administrator discussed the revised plans submitted on January 25, 1978 by Calvary Memorial Church which included: CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 6, 1978 - PAGE 8 9 1. Total land area - approximately 117,612 sq. ft. 2. Total hard cover - 46,000 sq. ft. (40 % limit - 47,045 sq. ft.) 3. Sanctuary - 4,480 sq. ft. with a maximum seating capacity of 400 4. Sunday A.M. program - approximately 2,5 hours with approximately 4-5 peak seating times per year and normal scatiiig with a maximum of 300 5. Sunday P.M, services - approximately 1.5 hours with approximately 2-4 peak seating times per year and normal seating with a maximum of 100 - 150 6. Wedding services - approximately 1.5 hours an• average of 75 - 150 times per year /. The maximum number of cars at p.?k times woula be 80, the normal amount neeJcvI for parking would be 45 - 60, and the available proposed parking would be 77. CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH 2420 DUNWOODY AVENUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TRANSFER & EXPANSION #340 (con't) o« Warren Anderson, representing the church, was present. He explained the above items in more detail. He stated they have had the ushers count cars during services when parents drop off their children at the church and have counted between - 60 cars. A good Sunday service includes about 300 members at one service. He explained that their move to the new building depends on their selling their present church. They plan to meet in the gymnasium where there is room for approximately 300 people until they have the funds to expand to the new sanctuary. Commissioner Hannah noted on the plan that there was room for additional parking in the area desig­ nated as recreation area if it was needed. The Commission was concerned about the parking and wanted Mr. Anderson to know there was not adequate room to expand the parking lot. The Commission addressed the proposed parking plan and if the parking as provided would be adequate. Commissioner Frahm addressed a potential traffic problem on County Road #15. G Mr. Anderson stated that their option is up July 1, 1978, adding that they had a sale which fell through, but now they have shown the building to another church. The Commission was concerned about street parking. - ♦ MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY Tlie Zoning Administrator explained there already are lots existing that do not have access and are landlocked and have only an easement for access# Duke Schneider, representing Mr. Bartig, asked if the City x^jould want a private drive along the 33 ft. which runs along the westerly edge of the subject property. He added that the property o\-mer to the south does not want to get rid of 27 ft. in order to buy another piece of property. The Zoning Administrator replied this could be possible to provide access now, but the City must be concerned about any future use. He stated if the back lots are built on the City would need the 27 ft. easement all along the south property for access. Commissioners Wilson, Hammerel and Mayor Van Nest agreed that at this time the 27 ft. should be^ required along the westerly parcel of the subject property, but not the separate southerly parcel. However, this would require combining the westerly parcel with the southerly parcel. If the southerly parcel is ever divided the 27 ft. easement would be required. ^Mayor Van Nest stated the access for the westerly Apiece should be to Stubbs Bay Road. The Commission further discussed the point of access for the westerly parcel. The Commission also reviewed the revised plat which noted the location of the existing house. The revised plat did not, however, indicate combination of the westerly and southerly parcels. The owner of the southerly parcel agreed to purchase the westerly lot when the subdivision is completed. The Commission suggested two alternatives for access: 1) submit a 60 ft. right-of-way along the south lot line of the easterly parcel to provide access from the westerly lot to Stubbs Bay Road; and 2) combine the southerly parcel with the westerly parcel to eliminate landlocking. The applicant must provide evidence of a purchase agreement and projected combination of the two lots. There being no further discussion, Commissioner Frahm moved. Commissioner Hammerel seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the request by William Bartig for preliminary approval of the subdivision subject to the following conditions. ■1 ' iv.-'i-fc v’i, •..V' : • X; ,vu .v/.Ulv.XXv minutes of a planning commission meeting held FEBRUARY 6, 1978 - PAGE 11 s (4) (5) (6) (7) Payment of a park dedication foe of $500 ($250 per lot); and A 27 ft. easement be provided along the westerly lot line of the westerly parcel; and The applicant provide access for the westerly parcel by combining the westerly parcel with the southerly parcel; or By providing a 60 ft. right-of-way along the south lot line of the easteri-- parcel to allow for an easement to access abbs Bay Road; and A current title opinion be . '.dressed to the City and approved by the City Attorney; and The final plat (mylars and hardshells) would be waived because both lots exceed the 5 acre lot area requirement; and The City Engineer approve the plat including a road easement and drainage and utility easements. WILLIAM BARTIG #343 (con't) € The Zoning Administrator suggested the Commission table the request so the applicant could present the revised plat at the next meeting for their review of the changes as submitted. Mayor Van Nest did not feel it was necessary for the revised plat to be reviewed by the Commission at their next meeting. He felt the conditions attached to the motion could be reviewed and resolved at staff level. The Zoning Administrator informed the Commission that A1 Olson had indicated the latest policy is to defer Council action on items if any conditions are not met so that all conditions are resolved by the time the Council approves the resolution of the final plat. ll V > m Motion - Ayes (6); Nays (0). The motion passed. Mr. Rebers, Dick Kemna, his engineer, and Bill Wear, property owner to the east, were present The Zoning Administrator explained that this property is partially zoned B-1 and partially residential. The Public Hearing was held some time ago, but it was only recently that he received a letter from the State Highway Depart­ ment regarding title to the triangular piece y-valong Highway #12. The letter indicated the State ^^Highway Department had not abandoned this piece of property. SIDNEY REBERS 2060 WAYZATA BLVD. subdivision (PRELIM.) 6t REZONING #308 The Commission reviewed the proposed plat showing the south lot line along the Highway #12 right-of-way. ^ 'it •. •■ • .1 ■V minutes of a PIJVNNING commission meeting held FEBRUARY 6, 1978 - PAGE 13 "^ere being no further discussion, CoiriBiissioner Iralim moved. Commissioner Hurr seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the subdivision request by Sidney Rebers based on the following: SIDNEY REBERS #308 (con* t) (1) 'V (2) Tlie applicant submit utility and drainage easements which are to be approved by the City Engineer; and Lot 1, Block 1 meet the 20,000 sq. ft. minimum lot area requirement and that the lot meet all other minimum requirements of the B-1 Zoning Ordinance; and No building permit could be issued until the issue of access onto State property is resolved; and A municipal sewer line availability is resolved; and A current title opinion is addressed to the City and approved by the City Attorney; and No park dedication fee be required on the residential part of the property. Motion - Ayes (6); Nays - (0). The motion passed. Mr. William Hooper, 15300 B Place, was present. The Zoning Administrator stated this is a very substandard lot. He pointed out on the map the proposed lot. He explained this property has been assessed for sewer. Mr, Hooper stated there is a natural drainage through the lot and he expressed concern that if a house is built on the lot there would be no place for the drainage to go. The Zoning Administrator stated this lot could be swailed along the 60 ft. right-of-way. Mayor Van Nest commented he had talked with Mr. Wisocki and it seems this is an unbuildable lot. Mr. Hooper stated he wanted to buy the property to keep it as an undeveloped lot. He added that he did not see how a building could be allowed on this lot with so many variances and since there is water on the lot now. Commissioner Frahm moved. Commissioner Hammerel seconded, a motion to recommend denial of the request for the following lot area and width variances: ARTHUR HEINTZ 1565 ORCHARD BEACH RD. VARIANCE-LOT AREA & WIDTH #345 ? ■! i ^CH RD. ^ 6c BM M.-U ■■: :T' rt^ ?■ j ^ > i MINUTES OF A PIJ^NNING COMl'IISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 6, 1978 - PAGE 14 Lakeshore setback Street and rear yard setbacks Side yard setback Hardcover The area of the subject lot is only 204 of the required area (80% of the lot will be a variance) Lot width Lot area The lots are incorrectly assessed for sewer (assessments should be waived) Motion - Ayes (6); Nays (0). The motion passed. The Zoning Administrator explained that Mr. Don Lindall is requesting to combine these lots and waive one of the assessments. He added that the Council wanted the Commission to express their views on this request. The Commission felt one of the structures should tom down and then one of the assessments could be removed. They also favored combining the two lots. Tlie Zoning Administrator stated these lots used a ^septic system in the past, and was concerned that one of the residences might again use the old septic system. The Commission was concerned about two structures on one parcel. The Commission recommended approval of waiving the assessments for Don Lindall with the following stipulations: (1) The applicant provide evidence the taxes are paid on both lots; and (2) The applicant provide evidence the ownership is current; and (3) The applicant provide evidence the two lots will be combined; and The existing cabin be razed; and All existing septic tanks on the properties be filled. Chairwoman McDonald asked the Commissioners if they -ould call the Village Hall by 3:30 P.M. on the day "of the meeting if they cannot attend the meeting. Chairwoman McDonald asked for any additions or changes to the minutes of the December 5, 1977 meeting. ARTHUR HEINTZ #345 (con't) DON LINDALL 666 TONKAWA ROAD REQUEST FOR ASSMT WAIVER Pj.-l-r .•! . v-s . ■ ■■ ■ W V >■ - MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 6, 1978 - PAGE 15‘ % « mi It was noted on Page 2, Paragraph 6, should be corrected to •*'ead, "that all the lots would meet the two acre minimum lot size requirement". On Page 4, Paragraph 3, the phrase "even though the alternative plan with Lot 24 as only one acre was preferred" should be deleted. On Page 7, Paragraph 6, should be corrected from "35%" to "407o". On Page 10, Paragraph 3, the word "Nays" should be corrected to "Abstain", and "the motion passed" should be corrected to "the motion failed". On Page 14, Paragraph 2, the motion should ue corrected to read "to recommend reappointment of Chairwoman McDonald", and Paragraph 3, "Hammerel" should be corrected to "Hannah". MINiriES OF REGUI.AR MEETING OF DECEMBER 5, 1977 There being no further corrections. Commissioner Hurr moved. Commissioner Hammerel seconded, a motion to approve the minutes of the December 5, 1977 meeting as amended. Motion - Ayes (6); Nays (0). The motion passed. At 11:49 P.M. Commissioner Hannah moved. Commis­ sioner Hammerel seconded, a motion to adjourn. (^^Motion - Ayes (6); Nays (0). The motion passed. • hi .' Q ■.••-Aw;.;..m m'-mm